Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agreement with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29881 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 12 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 14 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 14 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 14 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 15 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 16 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 16 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 16 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 18 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 18 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 19 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 19 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 20 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 20 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 24 SCHEDULE A - 1 31 SCHEDULE B 32 SCHEDULE C 33 SCHEDULED 34 SCHEDULE E 35 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 36 ATTACHMENT B 44 ATTACHMENT C 45 2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS This Agreement made and entered into thi day of Nc * dYi y , 20 11 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., a Canada corporation having its principal office at 10160-112 Street N.W., Suite 200, Edmonton, Alberta, T5K 2L6 CA (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017 -028 -KB for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services On An "As -Needed -Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide various CEI services to the City on an "as needed" basis; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2017, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017-29881, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. 3 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates, BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final signed and sealed (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 and 4 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed engineer in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to 4 perform CEI services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "E", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A-1 attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), the Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a Project, and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements stipulated in such Consultant Service Order. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Request for Qualifications (RFQ), Design Criteria Package (if any). CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design -builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance - oriented drawings or specifications of a design -build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design -build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design -build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design -build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been 5 reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub -contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: 6 Schedule A — Schedule A-1 Schedule B — Schedule C — Schedule D — Schedule E — Scope of Services Consultant Service Order Consultant Compensation Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all. known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. 7 Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. Consultant further represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall be accurate, coordinated and adequate for construction in accordance with applicable industry standards that govern the practice of engineering and shall comply with applicable City Codes, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services to be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate 9 records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. Notwithstanding this Section 2.5, the Consultant Service Order issued by the City to Consultant shall specifically delineate and describe the Services to be provided by Consultant for the particular Project (that is the subject of such Order). 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any inspection errors or omissions. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence, except due to Force Majeure as defined herein, in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 4 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting 8 concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its Subconsultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its Subconsultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any Subconsultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of Services by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such Services, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's Services. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design 9 professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked -up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant 10 Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance req uirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its. Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and 11 professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the 12 City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement. Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the. City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. 13 ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2:1 [Intentionally Omittedl 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. [Intentionally Omittedl 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re -bidding, or re -negotiating contracts. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its 14 Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by 15 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 {"Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re -use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack 16 of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except 17 for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies except for the professional liability and workers compensation/employers liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or 18 omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 19 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 900 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Attn: Sean Compel, PE, Leed AP, ENV SP All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami -Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 20 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 flntentionally Omitted.' 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this 21 Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank. 22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY CLERK Date. Attest 1 izoi CITY OF MIA BEACH: MAYOR 1 INCORPI ORATED I2 Signature/ ec etary c-ek 7c), cia we - Print Name t3b✓ ,o \�`7 Date. EC CONSULTING SERV S, INC. Signature tVl`c.6-04.4e " Print Name 23 %U W, J3, 20 I Date. APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall provide professional engineering services on an "as needed basis" to provide Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services pursuant to the Agreement. Each firm awarded a contract hereby agrees to be placed on a list of professionals that will provide CEI services where the City may call upon them to perform professional services for certain City projects, (the Project or Projects), as assigned by the City, in its sole discretion and judgment. As the need for service arises, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. Professional services will be quoted as a not to exceed or lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete a project and in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C" of this Agreement. The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order; the Consultant shall sign it and return it to the City for execution by the City Manager or his/her designee. The Consultant's Basic Services that may be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. The following services shall be performed: a) General Coordination: The Consultant shall communicate daily or periodically with the City, the Design Consultant and Contractor, as needed. They shall report on concerns as it relates to the construction effort and activities. In addition, the Consultant shall also coordinate with the Public Information Officer (P10) where notifications such as utility outages, road closures, etc, may be required. The Consultant shall monitor and verify that the Contractor has made the required notifications to the utility owners, residents and businesses as may be required. b) Estimating Services: Provide accurate cost estimates and schedules to avoid cost overruns and schedule slips. Prepare cost estimates and schedules by helping manage resources and supporting assessment and decision making. Services may encompass a wide range of cost - related aspects of engineering and program management, but in particular cost estimating, cost analysis/cost assessment, design -to -cost, schedule analysis/planning and risk assessment. c) Value Engineering Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, and provide cost estimating information at Value Engineering meetings between the City, the Design Consultant, and the Contractor for the Project. d) Resident's Information Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, address residents' concerns, participate, produce meeting minutes, and take a lead role in Resident Information Meetings with the City for the Project. e) Pre -Construction Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, 24 produce meeting minutes and take a lead role in Pre -Construction Meeting with the City, Design Consultant and Contractor for the Project. The Pre -construction Meeting shall be scheduled once the City issues the first Notice -to -Proceed to the Contractor. f) Weekly Construction Progress Meetings: The Consultant shall attend, participate and take a lead role in weekly construction project meetings with the City, P10, Design Consultant and Contractor on the Project. These meetings shall serve as forums to review the status of construction progress, discuss construction issues, discuss schedule and/or cost concerns, discuss potential changes or conflicts, review the status of shop drawing submittals and Construction Document clarifications and interpretations, and to resolve problems before they become critical. Consultant shall prepare weekly meeting minutes and distribute to all meeting attendees, review the two week look ahead provided by the Contractor and provide comments or objections to written statements within the specified timeframe. The Consultant shall prepare detailed weekly reports that describe the construction activities, progress, incidents and issues that have occurred on the construction site and distribute to the attendees in advance of the weekly construction progress meetings. g) Field Observations: The Consultant shall conduct field observations on a daily basis throughout the duration of construction. Field observations may be provided jointly by the City and the Consultant. If and when necessary, the City shall provide part-time construction inspectors for the duration of the Project. The role of the City's construction inspectors shall be limited. The Consultant shall be present at the construction site daily during the construction phase of the Project and shall be expected to be available, as needed, throughout the Contractor's work day. h) Stormwater Permit - Verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections, preparing reports and monitoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For each project that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit, inspector the inspector (at least one) should have successfully completed the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors". The Consultant's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 57, No. 187, Friday, September 5, 1992, pages 4412 to 4435 "Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites" and the City's guidelines. i) Specialty Design Consultant Site Visits: The Consultant shall monitor the number of specialty site visits requested by the Contractor or City and conducted by the Design Consultant. When it becomes evident that a specialty site visit from the design Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be required, the Consultant shall notify the EOR to discuss and schedule a mutually acceptable time for meeting at the construction site. j) Daily Reports: The Consultant shall prepare daily reports, on the same date as construction occurs, to record the daily performance of the Contractor as well as other significant construction related matters. Daily reports shall be uploaded by the Consultant to e-BuilderTM the City's document management system. At the end of each day or the beginning of the following day, the Consultant shall forward the original daily reports to the City for review. The Consultant shall maintain and file paper copies of the daily reports onsite for reference. The daily r,eports shall include records of when the Contractor is on the job -site, general field observations, weather conditions, change orders, changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily drilling and testing activities, testing results, testing observations, and records of the outcome of tests and inspections. At a minimum the daily reports shall contain the following information: 25 • Weather and general site conditions • Contractor's work force counts by category and hours worked • Description of Work performed including location • Equipment utilized • Names of visitors to the jobsite and reason for the visit • Tests made and results • Construction difficulties encountered and remedial measures taken • Significant delays encountered and apparent reasons why • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and City • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and residents • Summary of additional directions that may have been given to the Contractor • Detailed record of materials, equipment and labor used in connection with extra work, or where there is reason to suspect that a claim or request for Change Order may be submitted by the Contractor • Summary of any substantive discussions held with the Contractor and/or City • Summary of nonconforming work referenced to corresponding Non -Compliance Notice • A log of photographs taken k) Photographic Record: Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overall progress of construction, beginning with preconstruction documentation, following with on- going construction documentation, and ending with post -construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshot type taken to define the progress of the project and shall be filed electronically by month in e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system, labeled by date, time and location. The Consultant shall upload all photos to the e-BuilderTM document management system on a weekly basis. 1) Adherence to Construction Documents: The Consultant shall review materials and workmanship of the projects and report to the City any deviations from the Construction Documents that may come to the Consultant's attention. Consultant shall determine the acceptability of the work and materials and, in concert with the Design Consultant (as necessary), make recommendations to the City to reject items not meeting the requirements of the Construction Documents. m) Delivery of Unaccepted Materials to Jobsite: As new materials are delivered to the jobsite, the Consultant shall check the material's certifications and samples and verify that an approved shop drawing was submitted for the material in question. If it is determined that a submittal has not been approved, the Consultant shall immediately notify the City and issue a Non -Compliance Notice. In conjunction with the Design Consultant (as necessary), the Consultant shall direct and supervise the sampling and testing of materials to be performed by the City's independent testing laboratory. The Consultant shall maintain test report logs which shall be submitted to the City for review on a monthly basis and uploaded to e- BuilderTM, the City's document management system on a weekly basis. Consultant shall also review invoices submitted by the independent testing laboratories and recommend payment by the City. n) Shop Drawing Submittals: The Consultant shall review shop drawing and product approvals throughout the duration of the construction period for familiarity prior to delivery of materials. Consultant shall verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log, conducting timely submittals, and uploading approved shop drawings to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. o) Issuance of Non-compliance Notices: The Consultant shall be responsible for notifying the City when they become aware of a condition that is believed to be in non-compliance with 26 p) q) Construction Documents. Anytime the Consultant notices a potential construction problem or a condition that could result in non -complying materials, equipment or workmanship, the Consultant will need to determine whether the condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety. 1) If a condition does not pose a threat to public health or safety, immediate verbal notification or "Pre -Noncompliance Notice" of the potential non-compliance should be made to the Contractor and the City. This verbal notice shall be documented in the Consultant's daily report, as well as an e-mail to the contractor with a copy to the City's Project Administrator advising the Contractor of potential construction problems, errors, or deficiencies that can be promptly resolved and do not warrant a Non-compliance Notice. If the Contractor fails to respond to the verbal notification within a reasonable timeframe, the Consultant shall notify the City and the City's Projects Administrator and shall issue a written Non-compliance Notice. 2) If a condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety, the Consultant shall notify the Contractor and City immediately and the City's Projects Administrator shall issue a Non-compliance Notice to the Contractor. Non-compliance Notices shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements, along with a required timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor. Other items that should be included in the Notice include a reference to the provision of the Construction Documents that has been violated. Damage to Existing Facilities: The Consultant shall identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has notified the respective owner(s). The Consultant shall include record of such occurrences in the daily reports. Change Orders: Consultant shall perform an independent review of any Change Orders submitted by the Contractor and provide a written statement noting recommendation for approval or denial of the Change Order to the City. If recommended for approval, the Consultant shall note if the requested cost and schedule impacts are fair and reasonable. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining a Change Order log and uploading approved Change Orders to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. The Consultant shall also participate in change request review meetings with City and Contractor to resolve and/or negotiate the equitable resolution of request. r) Requests for Information/Construction Document Clarification (RFIs/CDCs): When RFIs and CDCs involve design issue interpretations, the Consultant shall coordinate with the Design Consultant, as needed, to resolve the Contractor's Requests for Information, Construction Document Clarifications, Field Orders, and other related correspondence. The Consultant shall be also be responsible for verifying that the Design Consultant is providing a written response to RFIs and CDCs in a timely manner and for processing, logging, and distributing all RFIs/CDCs. Consultant shall upload all RFI and CDC responses to e-BuilderTM' the City's document management system. s) Schedule: Analyze the Contractor's schedule(s) (i.e. baseline(s), revised baseline(s), updates, as -built, etc.) for compliance with the contract documents. Elements including, but not limited to, completeness, logic, durations, activity, flow, milestone dates, concurrency, resource allotment, and delays shall be reviewed. Verify the schedule conforms with the construction phasing and MOT sequences, including all contract modifications. Provide a written review of the schedule identifying significant omissions, improbable or unreasonable activity durations, errors in logic, and any other concerns as detailed in the contract documents. 27 t) Pay Requisitions: Consultant shall verify Contractor's pay requisition quantities and sign -off on all pay requisition quantities in the field. Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing with the Contractor the monthly payment requisition to confirm the status of completed and uncompleted work and stored materials. The Consultant shall advise the City of quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only be approved by the City. u) Equipment Tests and Systems Start-up: Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating various tests for quality control on the projects; verifying that equipment tests and systems start-up are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel; and that the Contractor is maintaining adequate records thereof. Consultant shall observe, record, and report appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-up. v) Record Drawings: Consultant shall monitor that record drawing mark-ups are properly maintained by the Contractor. The Consultant shall review the record drawing mark-ups as deemed necessary by the City. Contractor's failure to maintain the record drawings in up-to- date condition may be deemed grounds for withholding Contractor's monthly payment requisitions until such time as the record drawings are brought up-to-date. The Consultant shall notify the City if it considers the mark-up documents insufficient. The City shall make final determination of payment withholding. w) Safety: Consultants shall be expected to recognize a hazard that any reasonable non -safety professional might be expected to recognize. In addition, those safety obligations extend only to recognizable hazards that the Consultant may note while in the normal conduct of onsite business. If a situation presents itself, the following procedures should be followed: • Immediately direct personnel to remove themselves from the apparent danger. • Notify the Contractor's superintendent of the apparent condition that caused the concern and that the affected personnel were directed to remove themselves accordingly. • Notify the Contractor of the situation that arises concern, both in writing and verbally. • Issue a written Notice of Noncompliance stating that the Contractor should take immediate action as it deems necessary to correct the deficiency / condition. • Write a full report in the Daily Report on the condition found to be unsafe, all actions taken, and correspondence written, including times and names. • Take photographs, of the concern. • If the Contractor does not make corrections, the Consultant should notify the City. • The Consultant shall review the situation with the City for further direction. • The condition, as well as all conversations and correspondence, shall be recorded in the Consultant's Daily Report. • In the case of a construction -related accident, Consultant shall notify the City of the accident. Consultant shall direct the Contractor to prepare an accident report with a copy forwarded to the City. x) Quality Control: The Consultant shall review and monitor the Contractor's adherence to an acceptable quality control program submitted by the Contractor prior to the issuance of the second Notice -to -Proceed by the City. This program shall describe the Contractor's quality control, organizational procedures, documentation controls and processes for each phase of the work. Quality control during construction shall be the responsibility of the Contractor; however, oversight and ensuring the Contractor complies with applicable jurisdictional construction standards shall be enforced on the City's behalf by the Consultant. 28 y) Proceeding with Disputed Work: In the event that an agreement cannot be reached on a Change Order, the Contractor must carry on the work and adhere to the project schedule in accordance with the construction contract general conditions. The Consultant shall log all forced work efforts related to disputed change order on a Forced Work Daily Log Reports which shall be signed and dated by the Consultant and the Contractor's representative at the completion of each workday. The Consultant shall forward copies of this form to the City for record purposes. z) Maintenance of Traffic (MOT): The Contractor shall provide the Consultant, City and Design Consultant with approved copies of its MOT at the Pre -Construction Meeting for general information purposes. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to verify compliance with the MOT in the field. aa) Contractor Request for Services: When the Contractor requires services from the City for issues such as water main shutdowns, tie-ins to existing water mains, special regulatory inspections, etc., a request shall be made in writing by the Contractor, and forwarded by the Consultant to the City, a minimum of three working days prior to when required. bb)Substantial Completion: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Substantial Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the substantial completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a substantial completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the substantial completion "walk-through", perform a substantial completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City, and prepare a master punch list that describes items remaining to be completed. This master punch list shall be attached to the certificate of substantial completion. cc) Final Completion and Project Closeout: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Final Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the Final Completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a Final Completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the Final Completion "walk-through" and perform a Final Completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City. If the work is determined to be incomplete, Consultant and other attendees shall each develop a punch list of items requiring completion or correction prior to consideration of final acceptance of each project which shall be forwarded to the Contractor by the Consultant for the Project. Consultant shall complete all necessary close-out and construction completion forms and documentation in coordination with the City for the Project. The Consultant shall work with the Design Consultant and the Contractor, as necessary to ascertain materials required for the closeout binder, as required by the City, and review the Operation and Maintenance manuals for each project for completeness prior to forwarding documentation to the City. Once all parties determine the work is complete and the Contractor has delivered all close-out documentation to the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Final Certificate for Payment. The Consultant shall be responsible for providing final certifications based on the entire scope of work for the Project. dd) Consultant and Design Consultant Relationship: These services outlined herein are intended to provide support to both the City and the Design Consultant during the construction phase of the Project. The Consultant shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement under the supervision and contractual directives of the Project Administrator, and shall refer all matters pertaining to this Agreement to the City. In matters relating to the design 29 concept and constructability thereof, the Consultant shall conduct this scope of services under the technical directives issued by the Design Consultant such that the Design Consultant's EOR can provide final certification of the design components at Project Closeout. 3. Provide qualified personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement. The personnel shall be qualified by experience and education. Submit in writing to the City for review and approval, the names of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, including a detailed resume for each. The City reserves the right to have Consultant's personnel removed and substituted from the project, if the employee's conduct or performance is detrimental to the project. The City reserves the right to request periodic rotation of field personnel. 4. The Consultant shall furnish the City with a Quality Assurance Plan within 15 calendar days after the award of this agreement. The QA Plan shall detail the procedures, evaluation criteria, and instructions of the Consultant's organization for providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Significant changes to the work requirements may require the Consultant to revise the QA Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to keep the plan current with the work requirements. The Plan shall include, but not be limited to: • Consultant's QA Organization and its functional relationship to the part of the organization performing the work under the Agreement. The authority, responsibilities and autonomy of the QA organization shall be detailed as well as the names and qualifications of personnel in the quality control organization. • Methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products. • Outline the types of records which shall be generated and maintained during the execution of the QA program. • Methods used to control subconsultant and vendor quality. • An officer of the Consultant firm shall certify that the inspection and documentation was done in accordance with specifications, plans, City standards, and City's procedures. • Maintain adequate records of the quality assurance actions performed by the organization (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing services and products under this Agreement. All records shall indicate the nature and number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found, and the corrective actions taken. 5. Provides assistance in preparing for arbitration hearings or litigation that occurs during the Agreement time in connection with the construction project covered by this Agreement. 6. Provide qualified engineering witnesses and exhibits for arbitration hearings or litigation in connection with the Agreement. 7. Provide services determined necessary for the successful completion and closure of the Construction Contract. 8. Provide Post construction claims review — The Consultant shall analyze the claim, engage in negotiations leading to settlement of the claim, and prepare and process the required documentation to close out the claim. 9. The Consultant may be asked to provide all or some construction engineering and inspection services including inspectors, construction managers and/or construction administration staff for City Right -of -Way construction projects. 30 SCHEDULE A-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2017 -028 -KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount Days of: $ Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Administrator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator -Director Date 31 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION AGREEMENT BETWEENT THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS Project Name and No: Scope of Services: Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage of work complete as identified in the Consultant Service Order. 32 SCHEDULE C CONSULTANT HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE PRQ BSSICNAACONS t'RIJCTION RPQ 28 7.028 K8 G AND INSPECTION (C81} PIRt S PR0 IDE VARIOUS CEI. N $NEE D' Pro ott Pri Project larra8 r S $ Sonlor Cast Estimator 8 58 Cosor 78a SonIorSohod to 10 34 hod 73044 Sr, Iosl� ctor I 44F84 I �sP for (C I rI or Constr to j 78a Thoshold los otor Stlor Clvll ErtInoor ,ry t3 CIvItEn;(neer Senlor Elootri aI Entir BSa65 Elaetrl l n inaor 438 Senl rNte haul el B Ir ae SS=S 33 SCHEDULE D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 34 1. Wingerter Labs, Inc. 2. Longitude LLC SCHEDULE E APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank. ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 2017-29881 RESOLUTION N. A (RESOLUTION N F THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE cny IVIANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (REG) NO. 2011-02,84<e, FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION "ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION(CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN NEEDED" ARTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE -QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION GINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES, ON AN "AS NEEDED' BASIS; AUTHORIZING Tt E ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WISH EAC CONSULTING, INC., AS THE FIRST RANKED D PROPOSER; STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; A P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP., ., AS THE IR RANKED PROPOSER; PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC, AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE FIFTH NKEt PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ECI TE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOS RS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the City C mail ion approved the issuance e f Request for Qualifications (R No. 2017 -028 -KB for Pr i` tonal Construction En in e ri and inspection CE Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an'$ Needed Basis ; and WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No, 2017 -028 -KS (the "R ` *) was r iseed on F bru ry 10, 2017 and WHEREAS, a valuntary pre -Proposal meting was held on P bru 3, 201` i and WHEREAS, on .Aril 14, 2017, , the City received a total l f 18 pr. •sale; and WHEREAS, the Committee v n May 10, 2017 to iew and score the ern nin +r , ,.. sats; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project, inf tivu to the Citys CityCone of Silence Ordinance and the Gov rnment Sunshine Law, general t f tl on the scope of services, and u copy of each proposal, and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking was as follows: EAC Con ul n ., no., as the first ranked Proposer; Stento Consulting Services, Inc., as the second ranked Proposer; AQP Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp, as the third ranked proposer; Pons Bdrickrhof, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; and Calvin, Giordano & Associate% Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, , a T reviewing the i litigations of e of firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City e der hes reoor ended that the Mayor and the City €€ mmissi n authorize this Administration tstablish a pool of pre -qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engineering and ins s tion services, on an 4 s needed basis, And further er authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with EAC Consulting, Inc,, as the first ranked proposer; Stardeo Consulting Senfices, trio., as the second ranked 36 proposer; A&P Consu fn;: Transpotation Engineers Corex€s the third ranked proposer; Parsons Bfrickerhoft Inc,,as the fourth ranked proposer and Cabin, Giordano & Associates, Int, as the fifth ranked proposer NOW$ THEREFOREt EIE IT DULY St SOLVEDTHE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE crty OF MIAMI BEACK FLORIDAI that the Mayor and City Commission ission accept the recommendation f the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (REG) No, 2017.028.KB for Professional Const tion Engineering and Inspection (CE0 Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an As Needed rile', authorize the Administration to establish a pool of prevalified consultants for specific tasks relating constructionengineering. and inspection services, e s, on an °as n basis; authorize the .Administration to enter into negotiations with EAConsulting, Ince as the first ranked r p serk Slanted Consulting Services, ino„ as the second ran proposer; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp., as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; and Calvin Giordano & Associates, Inc., se fits fifth ranked propose and further authortze the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing pro ers upon conclusion of successful negotiation the Adr in`. tret'n. PASSED AND ADOPTED this y.: day of 20 PhilipL 17,E n 201742 37 MIAMI BEACH aesolutionLtMLI COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jirmy L Morales, City Manager DATE: June 7, 2017 SU JECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA„ ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFO) NO 2017-028-K8, FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CE) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE-OUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES, ON AN AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EAC CONSULTING, INC, AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; A&P CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP„ AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC„ AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC,, AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. 0 44 c$ A 1 4 Adopt the Resolution, AN, Adequate management of construction projects by the Administration requires implementation of CEI services including, but not limited be, general coordination, value engineering, pre. construction, field observations, shop d * submittals, quality control, and closeouts, The ability to have a rotating list of CEI firms available to provide these amines enables the City to effectively efficiently moms, e these projects. On Mach 13. 2013, the Mayor and City Commission approved tthe award of a contract, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFO) No, $2-11/12 for Professional Construction Engineering end inspection (CEO Firms to Provide Vadous CEI Seivices on an As Needed Basis", to the top five ranked proposers: Atkins North 38 America, Irk,,Berm Ito Ajamil & Partners, , Chen Moore sold Associates, COM Castella Carvallo Thompson Selman, PA $ , and Parson Erinckerhoff, tri. (the " r e nt"), This gr er nt is fective through October 8, 2011* In order to completea successor agreement, on February 201/, the City Co mission approved to Issue the Request for Qualifications (RFC)) No, 2017-028.KB for Pm essional Construction Engineering and lnspection (CElj Firmsto Provide Various CEI Services on an °As Needed Basis°, On February 10, 2011, the RFQ was issued, A voluntary preproposEA conference to provide information tion tc proposers submitting a response was held on February 23, 2011. BFQ responses were due and received on April 14. 2017. City received a total of 18 proposals. The City received proposals from the following firms: 300 Engineering Group, RA. A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp. Alpha one cti n esid Engineerirg Corporation Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & 11nfrastructrxe, Inc. Calvin, Giordano Associates, Inc Chen Moore and Associates CIMA Engimering Corp* CPM North America PPLO EAC Consulting, , inc. Keith & Soh . Metric Engineering, Inca Network Engineering Sauce New Millennium i arl , no Petsons Brinokerhoff, Inc.. Pennoni Associates, Inc. Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP. Schwebke-Shiskin &Associates, Mc. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. On May 1, 2011, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee t C 28-2011, The Evaluation Committee convened on May 10, 2017, to consider proposals received. The Committee warn comprisedof Eugeneg mb Civil Engineer 1 11, Public Works Engineering Department, City of Mimi Beach; a� Gomez, , Senior Capital Project Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program Division City of Mien t Beach; Jose Rl CMI Engineer ill, Public Works Engineering Department, City of MI a °I Beach; and Mina Seme i, Senior Capital Project Coordinator, Capital Improvement Program Division, City of Miami Beach. The Committee was padded an overview of the project, Information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, The Committee was also provided with generalinformation on the scope of sees and a copy of each proposal* The Committee Instructedto score said r.ank each proposal pursuant to the evaluadon materia established In Me The evaluation pr. resulted ire raking of proposers in lcated In tt he t , In the foll wina order: 1EAC Consul Inc. 39 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 3, A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp, 4, Parsons 'Brinckerhoff, Inc. 5, Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. 6. Metric Engineering, Inc. 7. Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LIP 8. Keith & Schnars 9, New Millennium Engineering, Inc, 9, Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & 12. lie Engi •44-4In9 Services, Inc. 13, Chen Moore and Associates 14, Alpha Construction and Engineering Corp do 15.300 Enrit-.?,,::411rig Group, P.A. 18. Penrod Associates, inc. 17, CIMA Engineering Corp. 18, CPM North America PPLC nfrastmotu A sum of each topeanked firm follows: * r,` EAC Consulting, Inc, According to the information provided by the firm, EAC Consulting, Inc, has maintained a good professional standing with the State of Florida Division of Corporations for over 20 years and has held a professional engineering certification with the State of Florkin Department of Business Regulation and the Florida Board of Professional Engineering since its inception, All key professional staff members possess all the required licenses and certifications required to undertake and compkste CEI services for the City. The firm has more than 95 professionals and support staff, all located within the State of Florida and working out of four (4) offices located in MiamhDade„ Broward, Palm Beach and Orange Counti P*. Staitec Consulting Services, According to the information provided by the firm, Stantec, founded in 1964, provides professional consulting services in planning, engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, su ylng geotechnical, enviromental project manement, and project economics for infrastructure and facilities projects, Continually striving to balance economic, environmental, and social responsibilities, they are recognized as a woad -class leader and kviovator in the delivery of sustainable sokitions. They support public and private sector clients in a di *e range of markets at every stage, from the initiel conceptualladon and financial feasibility study to project completion and beyond. A & P Consulting Transportatkm Engineers, Corp, According to the information provided by the firm, A & P Consulting Is a mulfidisciplinary Dade County headquartered engineering company that was established in 1997. The firm has more than 95 local employees dedicated exclusively to transportation/infrastructure projects, A & P Consulting prides itself in serving a wide variety of clients and attending to their individual needs. The firm is um: 2 eled in client satisfaction providing their clients with focused and hat:Natio solutions that yield cost effective results, Since its establishment the firm has 40 completed a myriad of projects ranging in scale and complexity. The broad spectrum of award. winning projects provides the diverse fourdation necessary to triumph over any challenge that may raise, It is this diversity, which enables the firm to guarantee effective project execution for large-scale government projeote 'iritilie simultaneously delivering to private and government clients the delicacy that is Indispensable to their particular needs. Persons Srinckerthoff, Inc. According to the information provided by the 'firm, Parsons Brffekerhoff provides ergineering and multidisciplinaly services In a vast way of industry sectree, with a focus on technical excellence and client service, Throughout Florida, the firm services a diverse range of transportation projects, administering infrastruture and toretruction expertise. The hes construction experience Comprises ceretruction management, program management, and CEI on traditional and altenotive delivery approaches with publicaector ,clients such as F DOT, counties, municipalities, expressway authorities, milation departments and school boards. Through their statewide experience, the firm has developed an in-depth knowledge FDOT and expressway authoritys policies and procedures and Florida contractor construction methodologies and site conditions, enabling the firm to consistently deliver projects that are on schedule, within budget and designed and built in conformance with contract plans and specifications. Calvin, Giordano & Associates, no. According to the information provided by the firm, Calving Giordano & Associates has a proven track record, technical e edence, exceptional project management, reliability, responsiveness and an umparalleied dedication. The firm has been providing services in the transportation industry for over 15 years. They strive to ensure their clients' projects are built in accordance 4th F DDT Standard Specifications for Road and Sedge Construction, F DEP, Cities, and Counties approved plane and specifications, Finally, CaMng Giordano & Associates provides experienced professional engineers, project administrators, contract support specialists, resident compliance specialiate, LAP coordinators, Inspection staff, project managers, and administrative skiff for all facets of r* re way and bridge construction projects. After reviewing all the submissions and results of the evaluation process, 1 recommend that the Mayor and City Commission appmve the resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a pool of pre -qualified consultents for speoific tasks relating to construction engineearXj end inspection services, on an as needed basis," in order to assure that the CHO needs for construction engineering and inspection eervices is available expeditiously from firms qualified to perform the mot EAC Consulting, [no, as the first ranked proposer; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp., as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Brinckerhoff, ince as th fourth ranked proposer, and Calvin, Glords & Associates, Inc., as IN fifth ranked proposer. F r, 1 recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute agreements, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Adminietratkin, voith the pre -qualified firms, Ensur naive Mobility Addressing Modes Throughout The City 41 The cost f the related services, t rmtne upon successful ne s ttetto . are subject funds availability approved through it *s budgeting process. Grant fund rr stsa be utilized. Let Put Works rt «tk» c ttetrxr t A rsproa t P' Pr 42 43 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 44 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`'' Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.goy PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS April 6, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Friday, April 14, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. I. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Pre -Proposal Meeting Sign In Sheet II. MODIFICATIONS. A. Section 0300 Submittal Instructions & Format, Tab 3 has be revised as follows: Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation o•tions for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. B. Appendix F Contract, Article 5 has be revised as follows: 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Teq and Inspection: Providing threshold 1 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS provided; i ewever, that surveys o derumen-tation arc not additional services. 5.24— Ceotech n icaI-e,nEfi neer-i:ng—P-revid ink enR4er>tai investigations -and site evaluatie4s7 tore -r -eq _ _e • e - - bu+it sveys- *** III. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. eMees-er-site Q1: On page 13 it states "For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services" Where can we find Tab 3? Al: Please refer to Modification A above. Q2: I would like to know if there are any restrictions for Sub -consultants in relation to teaming - up with several prime Consultants on Miami Beach CEI (RFQ 2017 -028 -KB) project. A2: There are no restrictions for sub consultants teaming up with several prime consultants. Q3: Any chance the submittal deadline for subject RFQ will be postponed? A3: Submittal deadline was extended pursuant to Addendum No. t Q4: Who is on the Evaluation Committee? A4: Evaluation committee has not yet been established, Q5: On page 13 the instructions for Tab 3 - Approach and Methodology ask us to address the project timeline. As this RFQ is for CEI services, the project timeline is a function of the construction contract and is therefore out of our control. The same can be said for identifying phasing options - that is a function of the design and the CEI firm has no control over that aspect of the project. How should we address these two issues? A5: Please refer to Modification A above, Q6: Tab 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements states that Appendix C is to be filledout and included. C1 in Appendix C indicates that proposers are to include a minimum of 5 CEI references in the past 10 years - must include project name, project description, commencement and completion dates, project contact information, and prime proposer's role. Tab 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm states that proposers should include relevant experience (but is not restricted by 10 years) - must include for each project a project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone and email, and term of engagement. It appears that these 2 sections are asking for the same information, except Tab 2.1 does not have a 10 year restriction. Please clarify that this is the case and that projects 2 ADDENDUM NO, 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS referenced in Appendix 01 should also be included under Tab 2.1, A6: Proposer may submit the same projects listed in Appendix C1 or additional projects; it is at the discretion of the proposer. Q7: Is there a conflict of interest if a material testing company has a contract with the City and is included as a sub consultant in our proposal? A7: There is no conflict; however this contract will not require material testing. Please refer to Modification B above. Q8: Page 26, Item C1,1 - Question: the item states "...(CEI) services to other governmental organizations or public entities,.," can references from the City of Miami Beach be used? A8: References may be from the City of Miami Beach. Q9: Please advise if the Project Manager must be a licensed professional or can a person having suitable qualifications and experience be designated as the Project Manager? A9: The PM does not have to be a licensed professional. Suitable qualifications and experience will be sufficient. Q10: Responses to Appendix A will be as a separate document or typed into PDF form? A10: Responses to Appendix A may be provided in a separate document or typed into a PDF form. Please keep in mind This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. Q11: 2.3 Financial Capacity, is the Dun & Bradstreet (SQR) required at time of proposal or after selection of consultants? A11: At the request of the city, proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the procurement contact named in the solicitation. Q12: Will we need to include complete services for public information, not to be done by the City? Al2: No. Q13: Our company wishes to amend our company policy with regard to Benefits by including the below statement. Does the City find this company policy acceptable for the purpose of compliance with its "Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494"? 3 Statement to be included: "In the event that a law in a state or specific jurisdiction or a t.IWORRAWOMMOtieWORW. ADDENDUM NO, 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS condition of a client contract requires us to provide benefits for domestic partners, we will provide the coverage required by applicable law or contract to domestic partners who are required to be covered." A13: Response should be submitted with your proposal for the City's review. Q14: On Page 3 of the RFQ there is a statement right above Item 3. That reads " This RFQ is not governed by the Requirements of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, Section 287.055 is referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation's Act which governs how Professional Services contracts are procured in Florida. Please clarify the intent of the City regarding this statement. Will price be a consideration? Or will professional qualifications be the only consideration? And if so why is this contract not governed by F.S. 287,055? A14: Only professional experience and qualifications are being considered for this solicitation. Q15: Who will be the Contract Manager or Project Manager for the City of Miami Beach? A15: Contract/Project managers may be from any City department requiring professional construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services. Q16: Has the Technical Review Committee been appointed? If so who are the members? A16: Evaluation committee rnembers have not yet been established. Q17: Will any of the projects that will be assigned under this contract be funded with Federal funds or through Local Agency Program (LAP) funding? A17: It is the intent of the City to use this contract to provide CE&I services for any City project including projects that are partially funded with federal funds. Funding for CE&I services will be paid with local funding. Q18: Will this contract include construction inspection services for buildings or other vertical structures? A18: Yes. Q19: Will Threshold Inspections be part of the services of this contract? A19 Please refer to Modification B above. Q20: How many contracts will the City award for this procurement? A20: It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will be contacted on an as -needed basis. 4 ADbENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Q21: What will be the duration of this contract? A21: The term of this contract will be for a period of three (3) years with the option to renew two (2) additional one (1) year terms. Q22: What will be the dollar value of this contract? A22: To be determined. Q23: Please advise if form 330 is required to be included in the Statement of Qualifications? A23:, The Standard Form 330 is not a submittal requirement of this solicitation. Q24: Is there a conflict of interest if a material testing company has a contract with the City and is included as a sub consultant in our proposal? A24: Please refer to response A7 above. Q25: Will the information from and presented at the Pre -Proposal Meeting on February 24th be published as an addendum to the RFQ? A25: Questions raised in the pre -proposal meeting have been included in this addendum. Q26: Does the City intend to request the D&B SQR to be submitted with Tab 2 and will this be. stipulated in an addendum? A26: See response All above. Q27: Please clarify the page and/or file size limitations for the SOQ as discussed In the Pre - Proposal meeting? A27: The page size and/or file size is at the discretion of the proposer. Q28: What is the previous RFQ Advertisement # to the present "Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI services on an as Needed Basis" # 2017 -028 -KB? A28: The previous RFQ No. was 52-11/12. Q29: Can you please upload the Pre -proposal meeting sign -in sheet? A29: Sign -in sheet is attached as Exhibit A, Q30: On page 18 (#3) it's requesting (3) references, also on page 26 under 01 (#1) it's also requesting (5) references. Do we need to submit a total of (8) references ? Or just (5) as stated in the pre-bid meeting? A30: Please refer to response A6 above. Q31: Do we need to submit the Appendix F- Contract (page 38) with submittal package? Or is 5 ADDENDUM NO, 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS this only submitted when the project has been awarded? A31: The contract is not a proposal submittal requirement, Q32: Do we need to submit any pricing? A32: Pricing is not a proposal submittal requirement, Q33: Can you clarify page 13,TAB 3 -- It states "for each scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of services, submit detailed information on the approach..." a) Are you referring to scope of work outlined in Appendix C — page 26-33 (C2 Statement of Work)? b) What doyou mean for each (underlined above)? A33: Please refer to response Al above. Q34: How many CEI firms will be selected from this RFQ?. A34: Please refer to response A20 above. Q35: Appendix A, number 5 states: "Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub -consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation." Where in the solicitation is "controlling financial interest" defined? A35: Please refer to the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code, Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado a{7miambeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bade 306-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. S et y, Al a..Pr Is curement Director 6 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017.028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS EXHIBIT A Pre -Proposal Meeting Sign -in Sheet 7 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS MIAMIBEAC CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 cpo 11 ie6 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 20 -KB FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS ... 11/ 7:Pgf4: . ' ,,,-..i.. 1, -:: ,:::,..:•,'..:. - :'.,TA.:,;;::o' st'-ki:-:',1 ' t,',..::::', :•,..:.;,414,11c'' -it. N44,. ' .::;!,1-- - 7,,A.,,z.F,,,,.;•!;,:ta.,.<.i.fLot:-Ii.:,',...DRtLS ,,•:,,A-rhA,,,;,:j4ivi..:;.% Misty Bada Procurement - CMB ' 305-673-7000 kristybadaamiamibeachfl.goy ext. 6218 -7-6-64-4., -..rn - , ePIL4M—eD E , J/005, c 0 . 6) Sof 513 eSse 6-A4,4 rez, 62-01-); , .. ce, -, 6)54-105 cps al 9142/011; 7ii/4.70 ,Q4' 9! 10e.,iizkk.c.o.h,7 1 1 °"6161`449'7'16'6' 17 Ptrtg e.- Li 1 ,S iciyi Co ilsi- c6 11 Pert ce„ Ceilli. g Ptv Li21(:_:, (.,0-7o 17,boisc, El/11 c 0 pi tze, kr°41,4 Ce. (i'll 00/1 VI, YOpe, V &AC, COO & K. 'Z [11101 .....,, 1 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 0900- Ca- ii -S .----- TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017=0'03 -KB FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEJ) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON ,AN "AS ..,.-,1 Ii_qtitt:1?,-0..0.4 4;: gi'ir ,,,,,n, •t! ' .; • ' ,,..- #4 ., , 4. ;* IA „ „ ..f. ''',4';i:-'-'-';','.g,-,g,0,401•:')!N;.' j 0 I en ... nen i• et ty) I ,, 6;) li. 2747 'Be i -ii, n ig,fte----zot7474 o i'V.re."4.-7/%10°.‘ /we - ‘404‘7.4 7 a g..<46,c-o 44-'441; a)fre _,C 21,-C /Pe/177 °pi 3$o8 -8 4.4 ---- Co M Ri Citgoemn , co -mit i 0 Dot i 6 14)„.7.• „.4) CV )4,44 8 ' 30S --'i k 1/3 '401— (PA -1'11'4)&5 .ZrZ . 40' S•'kV n LsV6 A--,cd.4 no, v\ A 6. wee_ 2/A,16oek . 5-1-Thei C -t -i 9V6- LI 9 1.- 1 fau s,71 - ear) covk0E nil )/-1. -SP— w pi ,acr -S1Peill , -s-6)-er , co -r) 2 M1AMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 Poi -7e.0.28--ieb TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017.4-0-3413 FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS ....;-: 'f,-:.,'::'••!'7, ''':' . .7 :::, ;*.M.;.; ';;..'''',.. . .'' 4 ; ' 4 ' :;:-... . ''' - , ' , i'., :".‘, ','• ... ''LJ ' lX51:::. 1) - ,.;•i'.:.:r'..;..• _ , ,,,„„ ,,, :, - .., ._•„., 'AV::' , 4 n -. :'":1,-;.3::'' •t. :'•?"'14:it-•.'i:',"'. ,./ ':' ,, ',::::."4,, '' , "'• 1! COMPANY r• I :o ; 'fr ' ' " .,,,. . • , . w"..,. ,,,,„ '!„.,,,, . '$•-, 4..411:-A4:(.'47-". )SS ErZ ik 5715/6 19P T -g- 3 as-- z.,?— . A 7- ) A. -..--5'rL1,,i"' i i.Pc-7-67‘ Co rn P el 6 E jrAorck ie_s- e bia,y, o G,,c, vs, 40,\ Yy Ig— c.)\ ( (--/ 'IN-\ C..., \r,.. ttA, LA.AVVr,-,g_i,, \A. CAJ:(..5 , lA 44,-• 7a6 2 V6'7/ 2 / . . 3 • MIAMILEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING' SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 „..i01-7-cve TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2117_40.3"-X13 FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) HRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS ,., i4'1I 1 SE '':. .14:.N.:, rMr . v v, i AP T .i. -Aut.- Cc...x;Lic,-1..., t -:I-0- 9001A°2_, 4e4cit,,,e-&(-)..,t,ce,v-k.A cf)11 Ciatieil).a• PAYI'cli-elt Plstrin 6 A PriaAn (DS- (epic; 4 - _9_1 o o C i et udl ik He paun myy-, t (0(y) h,.,1,.. 6 6 "?-s-c174-f s A- 4,0,1.49 ( 0 (\s\) \ *c.{)-- 5 aoi 8,31()A,K) 35 i- .1&....,-717,- 1 \--c,b'---.0....(-) ( (S'\/ ,-- -i: /04,t). .v ih,,,-; 1:-.71,4 Eki er We/5i aten„ 114/ii,9 ,A,e) rc- ,,, &L 61A4.0 q, (..$)s2.,Ue q& ' cte--- v.cst.u.,,41,...e,:‘ 6 PI u -a -/Z epr, V iS Lo r la. , -'„ NO`Ori-1-71..64-, PLAC?op s.s.j, 24 YZAN 7 CrrYiri 6fI 46'1K) ,„--i j656 MIRA lo ,f) A CAP .6o6tiu6,,E,9_1416-Ibu< - 93Yr '1 mi rowl.da, e_cd 4 /v\LAMIIEAC H City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachfl,gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel; 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 30, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, April 10, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted, Proposers are cautioned. to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(ct)mlamibeachfl.cov, Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bade 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission, Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro sal. nis rement Director 1 ADDENDUM NO. 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS AMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3'd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,mlamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786.3944002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 28, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). 1, RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p,m„ on Thursday, April 6, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted In writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaeIGranado(cr�miamibeachf .i ov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bade 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Al Ders P ocur. ent Director ADDENDUM NO, 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS MIA.MJBEACH • City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO, 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 28, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined), I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p. n., on Thursday, April 5th, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted, Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL . CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl.dov, Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email; Kristy Bade 305-673-7000, ext, 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl;gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission, Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Si r ly, Ale Denis Pro ure ent Director 1 ADDENDUM NO, 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS � MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,mlamibeachfl,gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 21, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, April 3rd, 2017, at the following Location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(cr�miamibeachfl.gov, Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Ale D. Is Rr� urement Director ADDENDUM NO, 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL, CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS R=QL=ST F02 Q ALI FICA11O \S (RFQ PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS 2017 -028 -KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: MARCH 27, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: MIAMI BEACH KRISTY BADA, CONTRACTING OFFICER III PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 l www.miamibeachfl.sm I kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS &FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERT|F|{}ATON.QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 17 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 36 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 38 RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 2 BEAC SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 1, GENERAL. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the "City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the "contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (w w publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. Adequate management of construction projects by City of Miami Beach departments requires implementation of Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services during construction. The ability to have a rotating list of CEI firms available to provide these services for various City departments would enable the City to effectively and efficiently manage the construction phase of these projects. The scope of services describes and defines the CEI services which are required for contract administration, inspection, and materials sampling and testing for the construction projects. The Purpose of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to qualify Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) firms to provide various CEI services to the City on an "as needed" basis. Additionally, the terms "FIRM", "PROPOSER", "CONSULTANT," `PRIME PROPOSER" are used interchangeably and shall refer to the firm that will contract with the City for the performance consultant services and work for the project. "As needed" basis means that each firm awarded a contract pursuant to this RFQ will be placed on a professional CEI list where the City may call upon it to perform professional projects, as assigned by the City Administration. As the need for services arise, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will be contacted on an as -needed basis. This RFQ is not governed by the requirements of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE. The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued February 10, 2017 Pre -Submittal Meeting February 23, 2017 at 10:OOam. Deadline for Receipt of Questions March 17, 2017 at 5:OOpm Responses Due March 27, 2017 at 3:OOpm Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 3 h i 1 �W wAC Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: KRISTY BADA Telephone: 305-673-7490 Email: KRISTYBADA • dditionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranadona miamibeachfl.gov; or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre -proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre -PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre -Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send .an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone: 6. PRE -PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre - submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely H B: 1 VA' responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado©miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: h ttp://web,miamibeachLgov/procurement/gcroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE • PROTEST PROCEDURES • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE -CERTIFIED SERVICE - DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS & SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485,3 CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub -contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject t0, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposersaree expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. B EACH 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters (five (5) days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. NOT USED. 18. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service -disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service -disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service -disabled veteran business enterprise, 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. ..1► • ._.-• Is B _AC 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract, It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Refection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re -advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one -hundred twenty (120) calendar days after proposal opening, date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense) of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees,agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history, of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non -submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 26. TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES, Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. it 3=AC 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre -award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer (s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as -needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. BEAC 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION, The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and 5, 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. Ali records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43. OBSERVANCE OF LAWS, Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services andlor project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance; of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST, All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 10 B AC 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS. A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order (or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases, the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract, to be approved byte City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank 11 SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3 -ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearlymarked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience & Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal,dnb,com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Sup EgyPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended' that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 12 C3EAC Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub -consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). 13 3EAC— SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of. Procurement Management. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received, with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications Approach and Methodology 70 30 ,TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP POINTS 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the. Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement Management to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2 Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference .TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS• RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 14 BEAC 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Committee Member 1 Step 1 Points Proposer A� 82 Proposer. 76 , Proposer,. 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Total 104 91 92 Rank 11- ,_® 2 Committee Member 2; Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Total 101 100 84 Rank • Committee Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Low Aggregate Final MIIIIIIIIIIIIIII®ill Score Ranking*: 3 7 ' 2 a &� * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. 15 APPENDIX A trl M1AMBEACH Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 16 Solicitation No: 2017 -028 -KB Solicitation Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Procurement Contact: Kristy Bada Tel: 305-673-7490 Email: kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S) PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS (HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO,: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. 17 1. Veteran Owned Business. is Proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? I I YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran -owned business or a service -disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government, as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest. At Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References & Past Performance. Proposer shall submit at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name & Title, 3) Address, 4) Telephone, 5) Contact's Email and 6) Narrative on Scope of Services Provided, 4. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s), 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their Proposals, in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub -consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/, 18 7. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement, the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13 (October 1, 2012), the hourly living rate will be $11.28/hr with health benefits, and $12,92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent (3%). The City may also, by resolution, elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same (in a particular year). Proposers' failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over $100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with (same or opposite sex) domestic partners* or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Employees with Spouses Firm Provides for Employees with Domestic Partners Firm does not Provide Benefit Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached) with all necessary documentation. Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement!. 19 9. Public Entity Crimes. Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time, states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non -Discrimination. Pursuant to City Ordinance No,2016-3990, the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a) of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from, or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital or familial status, age or disability, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code, 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12, Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article, with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices, and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance, set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required, By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375, 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e -procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum.2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required, submit under separate cover. 20 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION! The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the "City") for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation, or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation, either before or after issuance of an award, shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications, and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation, as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, partners and employees, as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete. The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, Its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation, the selection and the award process, or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer, and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof, Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only, and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties. Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason, or for no reason, without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government -in -the -Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications, the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true, accurate and complete, to the best of its knowledge, information, and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida, 21 ' PROPOSER CER'TIFICATION.- I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other -proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of , 20 , personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of" , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: 22 APPENDIX B /V\1AM BEACH "No Bid" Form RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 23 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: ® Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications ®Unable to meet service requirements ®Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service OTHER. (Please specify) We do ® do not _ want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Kristy Bada STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2017 -003 -KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-028- B 1.1111111111111 24 APPENDIX C \A/V\i BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 I 0 • • r 25 C1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Bidder (defined as the Firm) shall provide a minimum of five (5) references providing professional construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services to other governmental organizations or public entities in the last ten (10) years. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, commencement and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email) and prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. The Consultant's Basic Services that may be provided under the Agreement entered into pursuant to this RFQ shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering, Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. The following services shall be performed: a) General Coordination: The Consultant shall communicate daily or periodically with the City, the Design Consultant and Contractor, as needed. They shall report on concerns as it relates to the construction effort and activities. In addition, the Consultant shall also coordinate with the Public Information Officer (P1O) where notifications such as utility outages, road closures, etc. may be required. The Consultant shall monitor and verify that the Contractor has made the required notifications to the utility owners, residents and businesses as may be required. b) Estimating Services: Provide accurate cost estimates and schedules to avoid cost overruns and schedule slips. Prepare cost estimates and schedules by helping manage resources and supporting assessment and decision making. Services may encompass a wide range of cost - related aspects of engineering and program management, but in particular cost estimating, cost analysis/cost assessment, design -to -cost, schedule analysis/planning and risk assessment. c) Value Engineering Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, and provide cost estimating information at Value Engineering meetings between the City, the Design Consultant, and the Contractor for the Project. d) Resident's Information Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected, to attend, address . • S 26 residents' concerns, participate, produce meeting minutes, and take a lead role in Resident Information Meetings with the City for the Project. e) Pre -Construction Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, produce meeting minutes and take a lead role in Pre -Construction Meeting with the City, Design Consultant and Contractor for the Project. The Pre -construction Meeting shall be scheduled once the City issues the first Notice -to -Proceed to the Contractor. f) Weekly Construction Progress Meetings: The Consultant shall attend, participate and take a lead role in weekly construction project meetings with the City, P10, Design Consultant and Contractor on the Project. These meetings shall serve as forums to review the status of construction progress, discuss construction issues, discuss schedule and/or cost concerns, discuss potential changes or conflicts, review the status of shop drawing submittals and Construction Document clarifications and interpretations, and to resolve problems before they become critical. Consultant shall prepare weekly meeting minutes and distribute to all meeting attendees, review the two week look ahead provided by the Contractor and provide comments or objections to written statements within the specified timeframe. The Consultant shall prepare detailed weekly reports that describe the construction activities, progress, incidents and issues that have occurred on the construction site and distribute to the attendees in advance of the weekly construction progress meetings. 9) Field Observations: The Consultant shall conduct field observations on a daily basis throughout the duration of construction. Field observations may be provided jointly by the City and the Consultant. If and when necessary, the City shall provide part-time construction inspectors for the duration of the Project. The role of the City's construction inspectors shall be limited. The Consultant shall be present at the construction site daily during the construction phase of the Project and shall be expected to be available, as needed, throughout the Contractor's work day. h) Stormwater Permit - Verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections, preparing reports and monitoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For each project that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit, inspector the inspector (at least one) should have successfully completed the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors". The Consultant's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 57, No. 187, Friday, September 5, 1992, pages 4412 to 4435 "Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites" and the. City's guidelines. i) Specialty Design Consultant Site Visits: The Consultant shall monitor the number of specialty site visits requested by the Contractor or City and conducted by the Design Consultant. When it becomes evident that a specialty site visit from the design Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be required, the Consultant shall notify the EOR to discuss and schedule a mutually acceptable time for meeting at the construction site. j) Daily Reports: The Consultant shall prepare daily reports, on the same date as construction occurs, to record the daily performance of the Contractor as well as other significant 27 construction related matters. Daily reports shall be uploaded by the Consultant to e-BuilderTM' the City's document management system. At the end of each day or the beginning of the following day, the Consultant shall forward the original daily reports to the City for review, The Consultant shall maintain and file paper copies of the daily reports onsite for reference. The daily reports shall include records of when the Contractor is on the job-site, general field observations, weather conditions, change orders, changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily drilling and testing activities, testing results, testing observations, and records of the outcome of tests and inspections. At a minimum the daily reports shall contain the following information: • Weather and general site conditions • Contractor's work force counts by category and hours worked • Description of Work performed including location • Equipment utilized • Names of visitors to the jobsite and reason for the visit • Tests made and results • Construction difficulties encountered and remedial measures taken • Significant delays encountered and apparent reasons why • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and City • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and residents • Summary of additional directions that may have been given to the Contractor • Detailed record of materials, equipment and labor used in connection with extra work, or where there is reason to suspect that a claim or request for Change Order may be submitted by the Contractor • Summary of any substantive discussions held with the Contractor and/or City • Summary of nonconforming work referenced to corresponding Non -Compliance Notice • A log of photographs taken k) Photographic Record: Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overall progress of construction, beginning with preconstruction documentation, following with on-going construction documentation, and ending with post -construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshot type taken to define the progress of the project and shall be filed electronically by month in e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system, labeled by date, time and location. The Consultant shall upload all photos to the e-BuilderTM document management system on a weekly basis. 1) Adherence to Construction Documents: The Consultant shall review materials and workmanship of the projects and report to the City any deviations from the Construction. Documents that may come to the Consultant's attention. Consultant shall determine the acceptability of the work and materials and, in concert with the Design Consultant (as necessary), make recommendations to the City to reject items not meeting the requirements of the Construction Documents. m) Delivery of Unaccepted Materials to Jobsite: As new materials are delivered to the jobsite, the Consultant shall check the material's certifications and samples and verify that an approved shop drawing was submitted for the material in question. If it is determined that a 28 submittal has not been approved, the Consultant shall immediately notify the City and issue a Non -Compliance Notice. In conjunction with the Design Consultant (as necessary), the Consultant shall direct and supervise the sampling and testing of materials to be performed by the City's independent testing laboratory. The Consultant shall maintain test report logs which shall be submitted to the City for review on a monthly basis and uploaded to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system on a weekly basis. Consultant shall also review invoices submitted by the independent testing laboratories and recommend payment by the City. n) Shop Drawing Submittals: The Consultant shall review shop drawing and product approvals throughout the duration of the construction period for familiarity prior to delivery of materials. Consultant shall verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log, conducting timely submittals, and uploading approved shop drawings to e-BuilderN, the City's document management system. o) Issuance of Non-compliance Notices: The Consultant shall be responsible for notifying the City when they become aware of a condition that is believed to be in non-compliance with Construction Documents. Anytime the Consultant notices a potential construction problem or a condition that could result in non -complying materials, equipment or workmanship, the Consultant will need to determine whether the condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety. 1) If a condition does not pose a threat to public health or safety, immediate verbal notification or "Pre -Noncompliance Notice" of the potential non-compliance should be made to the Contractor and the City. This verbal notice shall be documented in the Consultant's daily report, as well as an e-mail to the contractor with a copy to the City's Project Coordinator advising the Contractor of potential construction problems, errors, or deficiencies that can be promptly resolved and do not warrant a Non-compliance Notice. If the Contractor fails to respond to the verbal notification within a reasonable timeframe, the Consultant shall notify the City and the City's Projects Coordinator and shall issue a written Non-compliance. Notice. 2) If a condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety, the Consultant shall notify the Contractor and City immediately and the City's Projects Coordinator shall issue a Non- compliance Notice to the Contractor. Non-compliance Notices shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements, along with a required timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor. Other items that should be included in the Notice include a reference to the provision of the Construction Documents that has been violated. p) q) Damage to Existing Facilities: The Consultant shall identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has notified the respective owner(s). The Consultant shall include record of such occurrences in the daily reports. Change Orders: Consultant shall perform an independent review of any Change Orders submitted by the Contractor and provide a written statement noting recommendation for approval or denial of the Change Order to the City. If recommended for approval, the Consultant shall note if the requested cost and schedule impacts are fair and reasonable. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining a Change Order log and uploading approved Change Orders to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. The Consultant shall also participate in change request review meetings with City and Contractor to resolve and/or 29 negotiate the equitable resolution of request. r) Requests for Information/Construction Document Clarification (RFIs/CDCs): When RFIs and CDCs involve design issue interpretations, the Consultant shall coordinate with the Design Consultant, as needed, to resolve the Contractor's Requests for Information, Construction Document Clarifications, Field Orders, and other related correspondence. The Consultant shall be also be responsible for verifying that the Design Consultant is providing a written response to RFIs and CDCs in a timely manner and for processing, logging, and distributing all RFIs/CDCs. Consultant shall upload all RFI and CDC responses to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. s) Schedule: Analyze the Contractor's schedule(s) (i.e. baseline(s), revised baseline(s), updates, as -built, etc.) for compliance with the contract documents. Elements including, but not limited to, completeness, logic, durations, activity, flow, milestone dates, concurrency, resource allotment, and delays shall be reviewed. Verify the schedule conforms with the construction phasing and MOT sequences, including all contract modifications. Provide a written review of the schedule identifying significant omissions, improbable or unreasonable activity durations, errors in logic, and any other concerns as detailed in the contract documents. t) Pay Requisitions: Consultant shall verify Contractor's pay requisition quantities and sign -off on all pay requisition quantities in the field. Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing with the Contractor the monthly payment requisition to confirm the status of completed and uncompleted work and stored materials. The Consultant shall advise the City of quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only be approved by the City. u) Equipment Tests and Systems Start-up: Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating various tests for quality control on the projects; verifying that equipment tests and systems start-up are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel; and that the Contractor is maintaining adequate records thereof. Consultant shall observe, record, and report appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-up. v) Record Drawings: Consultant shall monitor that record drawing mark-ups are properly maintained by the Contractor, The Consultant shall review the record drawing mark-ups as deemed necessary by the City. Contractor's failure to maintain the record drawings in up-to- date condition may be deemed grounds for withholding Contractor's monthly payment requisitions until such time as the record drawings are brought up-to-date. The Consultant shall notify the City if it considers the mark-up documents insufficient. The City shall make final determination of payment withholding. w) Safety: Consultants shall be expected to recognize a hazard that any reasonable non -safety professional might be expected to recognize. In addition, those safety obligations extend only to recognizable hazards that the Consultant may note while in the normal conduct of onsite business. If a situation presents itself, the following procedures should be followed: 30 • Immediately direct personnel to remove themselves from the apparent danger. • Notify the Contractor's superintendent of the apparent condition that caused the concem and that the affected personnel were directed to remove themselves accordingly. • Notify the Contractor of the situation that arises concern, both in writing and verbally. • Issue a written Notice of Noncompliance stating that the Contractor should take immediate action as it deems necessary to correct the deficiency / condition. • Write a full report in the Daily Report on the condition found to be unsafe, all actions taken, and correspondence written, including times and names. • Take photographs, of the concern. • If the Contractor does not make corrections, the Consultant should notify the City. • The Consultant shall review the situation with the City for further direction. • The condition, as well as all conversations and correspondence, shall be recorded in the Consultant's Daily Report. • In the case of a construction -related accident, Consultant shall notify the City of the accident. Consultant shall direct the Contractor to prepare an accident report with a copy forwarded to the City. x) Quality Control: The Consultant shall review and monitor the Contractor's adherence to an acceptable quality control program submitted by the Contractor prior to the issuance of the second Notice -to -Proceed by the City. This program shall describe the Contractor's quality control, organizational procedures, documentation controls and processes for each phase of the work. Quality control during construction shall be the responsibility of the Contractor; however, oversight and ensuring the Contractor complies with applicable jurisdictional construction standards shall be enforced on the City's behalf by the Consultant. y) Proceeding with Disputed Work: In the event that an agreement cannot be reached on a Change Order, the Contractor must carry on the work and adhere to the project schedule in accordance with the construction contract general conditions. The Consultant shall log all forced work efforts related to disputed change order on a Forced Work Daily Log Reports which shall be signed and dated by the Consultant and the Contractor's representative at the completion of each workday. The Consultant shall forward copies of this form to the City for record purposes. z) Maintenance of Traffic (MOT): The Contractor shall provide the Consultant, City and Design Consultant with approved copies of its MOT at the Pre -Construction Meeting for general information purposes. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to verify compliance with the MOT in the field. aa) Contractor Request for Services: When the Contractor requires services from the City for issues such as water main shutdowns, tie-ins to existing water mains, special regulatory inspections, etc., a request shall be made in writing by the Contractor, and forwarded by the Consultant to the City, a minimum of three working days prior to when required. bb) Substantial Completion: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Substantial Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the substantial completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. 31 If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a substantial completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the substantial completion "walk-through", perform a substantial completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City, and prepare a master punch list that describes items remaining to be completed. This master punch list shall be attached to the certificate of substantial completion. cc) Final Completion and Project Closeout: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Final Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the Final Completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a Final Completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the Final Completion "walk-through" and perform a Final Completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City. If the work is determined to be incomplete, Consultant and other attendees shall each develop a punch list of items requiring completion or correction prior to consideration of final acceptance of each project which shall be forwarded to the Contractor by the Consultant for the Project. Consultant shall complete all necessary close-out and construction completion forms and documentation in coordination with the City for the Project. The Consultant shall work with the Design Consultant and the Contractor, as necessary to ascertain materials required for the closeout binder, as required by the City, and review the Operation and Maintenance manuals for each project for completeness prior to forwarding documentation to the City. Once all parties determine the work is complete and the Contractor has delivered all close-out documentation to the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Final Certificate for Payment. The Consultant shall be responsible for providing final certifications based on the entire scope of work for the Project. dd) Consultant and Design Consultant Relationship: These services outlined herein are intended to provide support to both the City and the Design Consultant during the construction phase of the Project. The Consultant shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement under the supervision and contractual directives of the Project Coordinator, and shall refer all matters pertaining to this Agreement to the City. In matters relating to the design concept and constructability thereof, the Consultant shall conduct this scope of services under the technical directives issued by the Design Consultant such that the Design Consultant's EOR can provide final certification of the design components at Project Closeout. 3. Provide qualified personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement. The personnel shall be qualified by experience and education. Submit in writing to the City for review and approval, the names of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, including a detailed resume for each, The City reserves the right to have Consultant's personnel removed and substituted from the project, if the employee's conduct or performance is detrimental to the project. The City reserves the right to request periodic rotation of field personnel. 4, The Consultant shall furnish the City with a Quality Assurance Plan within 15 calendar days after the award of this agreement. The QA Plan shall detail the procedures, evaluation criteria, and instructions of the Consultant's organization for providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Significant changes to the work requirements may require the Consultant to revise the QA Plane It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to keep the plan current with the work requirements. 32 The Plan shall include, but not be limited to: • Consultant's QA Organization and its functional relationship to the part of the organization performing the work under the Agreement. The authority, responsibilities and autonomy of the QA organization shall be detailed as well as the names and qualifications of personnel in the quality control organization. • Methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products. • Outline the types of records which shall be generated and maintained during the execution of the QA program. • Methods used to control subconsultant and vendor quality. • An officer of the Consultant firm shall certify that the inspection and documentation was done in accordance with specifications, plans, City standards, and City's procedures. • Maintain adequate records of the quality assurance actions performed by the organization (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing services and products under this Agreement. All records shall indicate the nature and number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found, and the corrective actions taken. 5. Provides assistance in preparing for arbitration hearings or litigation that occurs during the Agreement time in connection with the construction project covered by this Agreement. 6. Provide qualified engineering witnesses and exhibits for arbitration hearings or litigation in connection with the Agreement. 7. Provide services determined necessary for the successful completion and closure of the Construction Contract. 8. Provide Post construction claims review — The Consultant shall analyze the claim, engage in negotiations leading to settlement of the claim, and prepare and process the required documentation to close out the claim. 9. The Consultant may be asked to provide all or some construction engineering and inspection services including inspectors, construction managers and/or construction administration staff for City Right -of -Way construction projects. 33 APPENDIX D AM B LACI -I Special Conditions RFQ No, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach,, Florida 33139 34 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant. agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. 35 APPENDIX E iAtv\! BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 36 AMI INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements" of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 each occurrence - owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability - $ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty (30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. 37 APPENDIX F MAW\ BEACH Contract RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 38 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017.028 -KB •• • rC DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. 2017 - 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1, DEFINITIONS 41 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 46 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 50 ARTICLE 4, RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 52 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 52 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 53 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 54 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 55 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 55 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 55 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 57 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 57 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 58 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 58 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 58 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 59 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 63 SCHEDULE B 65 SCHEDULE C 67 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 68 ATTACHMENT B 69 ATTACHMENT C 70 Q1 • P' • 40 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS -NEEDED -BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and , a corporation having its principal office at (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As -Needed -Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on , the City Commission approved Resolution No. respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant. Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same, 1 41 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the. State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants 42 acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shalt mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding. agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design -builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 43 DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance - oriented drawings or specifications of a design -build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design -build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design -build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design -build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub -contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described: in the Consultant Service Order. 44 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shallnot be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A Consultant Service Order Schedule B — Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C — Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction. Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project, Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. 45 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, 'studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and ' l►. • 1 :-r'. 46 Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The. Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing theskill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In 47 addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re -performance of any non- conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re -performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re -performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re -performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked -up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to 48 promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. RI'lI B 49 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: AH services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance' with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Su bconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant'sobligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees, and. 50 acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission 51 on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 52 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City -Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City -requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re -bidding, or re -negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re -bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre -Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as -built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). 2617-na-KB 53 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forthin the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed • on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for AH Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by 2: -K 54 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise),correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 AH notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and .in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re -use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10,1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its 8 55 performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to. Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed: and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 56. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City arid its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify,keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. '_Q • • K 57 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultanthereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages dueto an alleged breach by, the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way, intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida. Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: 58 City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Attn: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami -Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant Q 2017-0 4.kB 59 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 60 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 61 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest CONSULTANT: Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name 62 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND 63 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2017 -028 -KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: , to be considered part of this Agreement. Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Days $ $ $ Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator -Director Date 64 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. k 17-0 - - 65 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE 66 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS ' 0 II • 67 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 68 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 69 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 70 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 46 Detail by Entity Name Page 1 of 3 Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Filing Information Document Number F01000005948 FEI/EIN Number 11-2167170 Date Filed 11/14/2001 State NY Status ACTIVE Last Event CORPORATE MERGER Event Date Filed 12/27/2007 Event Effective Date 12/31/2007 Principal Address 10160-112 STREET NW SUITE 200 EDMONTON, ALBERTA T5K 2L6 CA Changed: 02/05/2015 Mailing Address 10160-112 STREET NW SUITE 200 EDMONTON, ALBERTA T5K 2L6 CA Changed: 02/05/2015 Registered Agent Name & Address CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 1201 HAYS STREET TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 Name Changed: 02/14/2013 Address Changed: 02/14/2013 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title PRESIDENT GOMES, ROBERT J http://search..sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSear.ch/SearchResultDetail?inn... 9/21/2017 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 3 10160-112 STREET NW SUITE 200 EDMONTON, ALBERTA T5K 2L6 CA Title SECRETARY ADDISON, JENNIFER A I 10160-112 STREET NW SUITE 200 EDMONTON T5K 2L6 CA Title TREASURER LEFAIVRE, DANIEL J 10160-112 STREET NW SUITE 200 EDMONTON T5K 2L6 CA Title DIRECTOR, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, COO MURRAY, SCOTT L 1409 NORTH FORBES ROAD LEXINGTON, KY 40511 Title DIRECTOR, VICE PRESIDENT, ASST SECRETARY STONE, JEFFREY P 61 COMMERCIAL STREET SUITE 100 ROCHESTER, NY 14614 Title PRINCIPAL CUNNINGHAM, ROBERT R 6900 PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY EAST SARASOTA, FL 34240 Title SENIOR PRINCIPAL MORROW, KEITH 3200 BAILEY LANE SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34105 Title VICE PRESIDENT REAGAN, MICHAEL J 3700 PARK EAST DRIVE SUITE 200 CLEVELAND, OH 44122 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date http ://search. sunbiz. org/Inquiry/Corporati onS earch/S earchResultDetail?incl... 9/21/2017 View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format Detail by Entity Name Page 3 of 3 2016 04/21/2016 2016 08/26/2016 2017 02/16/2017 Document Images 02/16/2017 — ANNUAL REPORT 08/26/2016 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 04/21/2016 — ANNUAL REPORT 02/05/2015 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/17/2014 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/03/2013 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 02/14/2013 — ANNUAL REPORT 02/29/2012 — ANNUAL REPORT 02/01/2011 — ANNUAL REPORT 09/07/2010 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/27/2010 —ANNUAL REPORT 04/22/2009 — ANNUAL REPORT 07/24/2008 — ANNUAL REPORT 12/27/2007 — Merger 03/27/2007 —ANNUAL REPORT 06/30/2006 — ANNUAL REPORT 07/13/2005 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/08/2005 — Name Change 01/31/2005 — Name Change 01/31/2005 — Name Change 09/13/2004 —ANNUAL REPORT 08/04/2003 — ANNUAL REPORT 11/06/2002 —ANNUAL REPORT 11/14/2001 —Foreign Profit View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in•PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format http://search. sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inq... 9/21/2017 CITY OF ENGINEERING AND NNS ECTION C E M 1 A M I FIRMS AN TO NEEDEDPROVIDE ,"ABpSIS CEI SERVICES BEACH 2017 -028 -KB Stantec s-'+Bu1Id nc ow TAB 1. Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1. Cover Letter ` 2 1.2. Appendix A 4 References and Past Performance 10 Vendor Campaign Contributions -Financial Interest 11 Code of Business Ethics 12 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements 15 --r References Providing Professional CEl Services 15 TAB 2. Experience & Qualifications 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm 35 Firm History 35 ` ' Relevant Experience 37 ---?> 2.2. Qualifications of Proposer Team 57 ;+ , Organizational Chart 57 ' c Resumes 58 2.3. Financial Capacity 99 TAB 3. Approach and Methodology 100 Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1. Cover Letter 1.2. Appendix A References and Past Performance Vendor Campaign Contributions -Financial Interest Code of Business Ethics 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services CITY OF 2_ ops au ..a� BEACH 2017 -028 -KB CEI Stantec 1.1. Cover Letter Office of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Krista Bada, Contracting Officer III Cr") Stantec Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an "As Needed" Basis - 2017 -028 -KB What kind of team does it take to provide you with the right combination of enthusiasm, qualifications, and experience for this contract? It takes a team that works together and is driven to achieve. At Stantec, we collaborate across disciplines and industries to bring projects to life. We are ready to be your project partner and meet your needs in a creative and personalized way. Having worked with the City of Miami Beach and with extensive experience in South Florida, our Team's staff stands ready to continue our strong relationship with the City. As you read through our submission, you will gain an understanding of how Stantec Consulting Services Inc. is uniquely qualified to successfully continue to service the City. We are eager and excited to continue providing the City of Miami Beach with Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection Services. With over 28 years of local experience, Stantec has excelled at working with local municipalities on the planning and construction of infrastructure improvements and capital projects. We have always placed the highest emphasis on personal commitment of service to our clients, combining strong project management with the correct technical expertise and quality control procedures. We combine the best professionals for the project in delivering the advantages of working with a large firm while still providing the personal service. We have recently completed projects similar to the on-going and upcoming work in Miami Beach for the Cities of Miami, North Miami Beach, South Miami, Coral Gables, Golden Beach, Key Biscayne, Cutler Bay, Palmetto Bay, and Pinecrest, to name a few. The firm's design and construction management teams have assisted these municipalities in the improvements and reconstruction of their infrastructure systems. This has included projects such as roadway reconstruction, stormwater collection and pump stations, water distribution, sanitary sewer rehabilitation and replacement, undergrounding of utilities, and even city parks. Our Construction Engineering Inspections (CEI) services have included the contract administration of many roadway, drainage and utility projects. These services have been performed for several of the municipalities listed above as well as for the Florida Department of Transportation. Our Engineers and Inspectors have administered the construction of drainage collection systems, positive drainage systems, exfiltration trenches, drainage injection wells, stormwater pumping facilities, and the monitoring of the contractor's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Our utilities experience has included the installation and rehabilitation of water distribution and sanitary sewer collection and transmission facilities. These facilities have included the review of various pumping and re -pumping stations. We have assembled a team of support disciplines which has helped us complete many similar projects. The Stantec team will be able to provide to the City a thoughtfully -assembled, experienced, full-service team, organized and qualified to address every need of your projects. We offer extensive relevant experience, strong local presence, and effective project management capabilities. We have extensive experience with the Permitting, Environment and Regulatory Affairs, Water and Sewer Department, and with Miami -Dade County's Public Works Department. r We work closely with the Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the South Florida Water Management District. We believe that the Stantec Team has the necessary experience and knowledge in similar observation and construction projects that no other firm can match. We are confident that we can successfully fulfill and execute the requirements of this contract and provide the City of Miami Beach with outstanding projects - on time and within budget. The projects highlighted in our submittal help to showcase a few key successes of the team. They also help to demonstrate the wide array of services we offer beyond just construction engineering and inspection including civil engineering, structural engineering, environmental engineering, architecture, and public involvement. Ramon Castella, PE, LEED P will be the Principal in Charge and Sean Compel, PE, LEEDAP will be the Project/ Client Manager for this contract. Ramon is legally authorized to negotiate and execute the contract on behalf of our firm, as well as make representations for our firm during the evaluation phase. Ramon can be reached via email at ramon.castella@stantec.com, or at the Coral Gables office via phone at 305.445,2900. Ramon and Sean are both extremely familiar with continuing professional services contracts and have a true understanding of what it takes to exceed the City's goals. They have both personally worked on City of Miami Beach projects for a combined 35 years. In addition to our very capable in-house personnel, Stantec has enlisted the help of several sub -consultants with which we have had the pleasure of working with on more than one occasion for over 15 years, and can be utilized to provide additional services if needed. These are Wingerter Labs, Inc. providing geotechnical services, and Longitude LLC. providing surveying services With this expertise, we are confident that we are the best team for this contract. We appreciate the opportunity to express our sincere interest in being of service to the City of Miami Beach, and we look forward to continuing our rewarding relationship. We will be happy to answer any and all questions you may have. Feel free to call onus at (305) 445-2900. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Our team has the commitment, expertise, and capacity to deliver multiple complex projects at the same time. We see this as an opportunityto continue a long-term relationship and commitment to the City of Miami Beach. You have our personal assurance that your projects will receive the energy and attention they deserve. Res Ramon Castella, PE, LEED AP Vice President Stantec Achievement at every level begins and ends with a firm commitment to being the best we can be. City of Marra Beach - 20)7 -028 -KB 1 3 1.2. Appendix A Solicitation No: 2017 -028 -KB Solicitation Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Procurement Contact: Kristy Bada Tel: 305-673-7490 Email: kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. No of Years in Business: 63 No of Years in Business Locally: 32 OTHER NAMES) PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: orzo Castella Carballo Thompson Salman, P.A. (C3TS) FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS (HEADQUARTERS): 10160 -1 2th Street CITY: Edmonton STATE: Alberta, Canada ZIP CODE: T5K 2L6 TELEPHONE NO.: 780.917.7000 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAX NO.: 780.917.7330 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 900 CITY: Coral Gables STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Sean Compel, PE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305.445.2900 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: sean.comoel@stantec.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 11-2167170 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. itaate:: L2. Appendix A Veteran Owned Business. Is Proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran -owned business or a service -disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government, as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates N/A 3. References & Past Performance. Proposer shall submit at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. Please see our references attached. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name & Title, 3) Address, 4) Telephone, 5) Contact's Email and 6) Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their Proposals, in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub -consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Please see attached. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurementl. Please see attached. Stantec 1.2. Appendix A 7. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement, the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13 (October 1, 2012), the hourly living rate will be $11.28/hr with health benefits, and $12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent (3%). The City may also, by resolution, elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same (in a particular year). Proposers' failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over $100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with (same or opposite sex) domestic partners* or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Employees with Spouses Firm Provides for Employees with Domestic Partners Firm does not Provide Benefit Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached) with all necessary documentation. Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Stantec 1.2. Appendix A 9. Public Entity Crimes. Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time, states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non -Discrimination. Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990, the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a) of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from, or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital or familial status, age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina ,and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article, with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices, and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance, set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e -procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt Mar. 21, 2017 Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Mar. 28, 2017 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Mar. 28, 2017 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Mar. 30, 2017 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 April 6, 2017 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required, submit under separate cover. Stantec 1.2. Appendix A DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the "City") for the recipients convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation, or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation, either before or after issuance of an award, shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications, and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation, as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicants affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, partners and employees, as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete. The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipients own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation, the selection and the award process, or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer, and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof. Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only, and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties. Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason, or for no reason, without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government -in -the -Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications, the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true, accurate and complete, to the best of its knowledge, information, and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Stantec On this 13 day of April 20g, 7 personally appeared before me Ramon Castella who stated that (s)he is the Vice President and that the instrument was signed in behalf of its board of directors and acknowledged said deed. Before me: Not. +Ce for the State of Florida My Co ission Expires: November 27, 2019 • 1 TAB ' Cover Leiter Mirurni_xn uaii^Cations Requirements 1.2. Appendix A PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: 1, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Ramon Castella, PE, LEED AP Title of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Vice President Signature of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: c Date: April 13, 2017 State of FLORIDA County of Miami -Dade ) of Stantec , a corporation, the said corporation by authority of instrument to be its voluntary act and Stantec MACE MONAL11 Notary f'rlMe - itete M Fier1N Commisslen s fF 101310 My Comm Lykes Nov 27, 2015 Sardodlireugt *dorm* Min lash. City of Miami Beach - 2017 -028 -KB 9 1.2. Appendix A References and Past Performance City of Coral Gables Ernesto R. Pino, R.A, LEED AP, Assistant Public Works Director 2800 SW 72nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33155 Phone: 305.460.5004 eoinona coralzables.corn Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. City of Miami Beach Jose Rivas, PE, Public Works Engineer 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Phone: 305.673.7080 J o s e Rivas i@ mi amibeachfl.6ov Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. Town of Golden Beach Alexander Diaz, Town Manager 1 Golden Beach Drive Golden Beach, Florida 33160 Phone: 305.932.0744 alexdiaz(@qoldenbeach.us Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. Town of Cutler Bay Alfredo Quintero, Public Work Director 10720 Caribbean Boulevard, Suite 105 Cutler Bay, Florida 33189 Phone: 305.234.4262 aauintero(@cutlerbay-fl.gov Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. Village of Pinecrest Mark Spanioli, Public Works Director 12645 Pinecrest Parkway Pinecrest, Florida 33156 Phone: 305.669.6916 msnanioliC@ninecrest-fl.Qov Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. Stantec Village of Palmetto Bay. Corrice Patterson, Public Work Director 8950 SW 152 Street Palmetto Bay, Florida 33157 Phone: 305.259.1234 coatterson(@ oal:nettobav-fl.6ov Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. Village of Key Biscayne Tony Brown, Field Supervisor Phone: 305.365.7568 tbrown@keybiscayne.fl.us 88 West McIntyre Street Key Biscayne, Florida 33149 Scope: Engineering design and construction administration and inspection services. At Stantec, we look at every challenge as an opportunity to bring communities together. 1.2. Appendix A Vendor Campaign Contributions - Financial Interest We are a publicly traded entity listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Symbol: STN) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (Symbol: STN). We are required to be financially stable in order to maintain these listings and we are required to adhere to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and its Canadian equivalent (C -SOX). Our shares are widely held. Details on share ownership may be obtained from firms like Bloomberg. We are subject to ongoing independent audits that prove our financial stability and credit worthiness. For a com- plete view of our audited financial statements, visit the Investors section of our web site at w'rIw starTtec comiabout-us/investors.html. No individuals with a controlling financial interest have contributed to the campaign for a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 1.2. Appendix A Code of Business Ethics Code of Ethics Policy Policy Stantec conducts business in accordance with high ethical, moral and legal standards, efficiently, in good faith, with due care, and in the best interests of the Company, its employees, shareholders, and other stakeholders. Stantec maintains business practice standards that will earn the respect of everyone with whom the Company conducts business. Practice The following standards are intended to protect the Company's reputation and the quality of its services, as well as to serve the best interests of its clients, employees, shareholders, and other stakeholders. Application The Stantec Code of Ethics applies to all employees and is not intended to be exhaustive. Employees are expected to conduct themselves in the performance of their duties with high ethical, moral, and legal standards. Dealing with Each Other Stantec understands that effective relationships are based on the recognition of the value and worth of each individual and that it is necessary to provide a working climate that is conducive to the success and well-being of all employees. Stantec works to create an atmosphere of mutual trust and respect by being honest, fair, and consistent. Stantec treats all employees fairly and impartially and strives to consistently follow Company policies and practices. Stantec employees listen to one another and foster open and honest communications. Stantec values the opinion of employees, respects their diverse backgrounds, encourages communication among employees, and solicits ideas and suggestions to improve or benefit the Company. Stantec prohibits the use by its employees of any social or other media to post or display comments about coworkers, supervisors, clients or the Company that (non -exhaustively) • Are vulgar, obscene, threatening, intimidating, harassing • Portray the Company or individuals in a negative light • Are a violation of Stantec's Conflict of Interest Policy or other workplace policies against discrimination, harassment, and violence Posting or displaying such comments could result in disciplinary action being taken against an employee. Dealing with Shareholders Stantec is committed to protecting and improving shareholder value through the prudent use of Company resources and by observing high standards of legal and ethical conduct in all its business dealings. The 1.2. Appendix A Code of Business Ethics Company communicates with shareholders regularly, candidly, and promptly, providing the information necessary to evaluate its management and investment value. Dealing with Clients Serving clients is the essence of Stantec's business. Meeting our clients' expectations and providing good value are the best ways to ensure ongoing demand for our services. Stantec will accurately represent its services and clearly communicate the terms under which these services are provided. Dealing with Subconsultants and Suppliers Stantec is committed to the fair treatment of subconsultants and suppliers and will select subconsultants and suppliers who provide the best value for the Company and its clients while also respecting its clients' wishes. Proprietary Information Belonging to the Company Employees must maintain the confidentiality of the Company's proprietary information. Examples of proprietary information include strategic plans, client lists, marketing plans, rate tables, and much of the technical information that the Company generates or uses in its business. The disclosure or misuse of Stantec's business information can harm the Company's competitive position and/or reputation and may be a violation of applicable laws. Employees, therefore, must not disclose business information outside the Company unless they are authorized and legal to do so. Proprietary Information of Others Stantec regularly receives proprietary information from its clients, subconsultants, and suppliers. The wrongful possession or use of any proprietary information of any third party is prohibited. Employees may use lawfully obtained proprietary information only for the purpose for which it is provided. If an employee is offered, or comes into, unauthorized possession of third -party proprietary information, the employee must decline the offer and take appropriate steps, if applicable, to return the information. Abiding by the Law Wherever Stantec operates, it will at all times comply with applicable laws and regulations. In acting on behalf of Stantec, no employee shall, at any time, take any action which they know or reasonably should know to be in violation of any applicable law or regulation. Any time an employee is uncertain about the application or interpretation of a law or regulation, they should consult their supervisor who, in case of doubt, should seek the opinion of the Company's Risk Management team. Improper Payments No payment will be made by, or improper benefit conferred on behalf of, the Company either directly or indirectly to government officials, political candidates, or officers or employees of clients, subcontractors, suppliers, or competitors that violates applicable laws. Bribes, facilitation payments and trading in influence are strictly prohibited. Employees working outside North America should familiarize themselves with Stantec's policy regarding foreign business practices. Personal Business 1.2. Appendix A Code of Business Ethics Personal business should not be conducted during normal working hours. Any/all personal business activities should be confined to after hours or lunch breaks and should be consistent with Stantec's Conflict of Interest Policy and Practice, paying particular attention to the Moonlighting without Permission section. Reporting Violations of the Stantec Code of Ethics An employee who becomes aware of a violation of this code, or who believes that a violation may take place in the future, must report the matter. Ordinarily, the report should be made to the employee's immediate supervisor who, in turn, must report it to the Company's general counsel. If the supervisor takes no action or the employee feels that it would be appropriate to report to a person in higher authority, the employee should bring the matter to the attention of the general counsel. Requests for anonymity will be respected to the extent that this does not result in the violation of the rights of another employee. Reporting Violations of the Law In addition to reporting violations of the Company's Code of Ethics, it is Stantec's policy to protect employees against unlawful discrimination or retaliation by their employer as a result of lawfully reporting information regarding, or participating in, investigations that involve corporate fraud or other violations of applicable law by the Company or its employees. For further information, refer to Stantec's Integrity policy. Compliance Responsibilities Stantec's Code of Ethics is to be strictly followed at all times and under all circumstances. Any violation will subject an employee to disciplinary action up to and including termination. To protect its employees, shareholders, and other stakeholders, the Company has designated its general counsel as the individual who is responsible for administering and overseeing the compliance and reporting process of this code. The general counsel will report submitted. material complaints as he or she determines to be appropriate, or as required under the directives of the Stantec Board of Directors, to the chief executive officer, the chief operating officer, the chief business officer, the chief human resources officer, the chair of the board, or an appropriate committee of the board. Stantec and all of its employees benefit from an atmosphere of good ethical conduct. Employees are encouraged to discuss with their supervisor or regional Human Resources coordinator, or, if they prefer, with the Company's general counsel, any situations of existing or potential noncompliance involving themselves or others. 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Design Criteria Professional - Palm and Hibiscus Islands Miami Beach, FL Stantec served as Design Criteria Professional and Resident Project Representative for this design/build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and combatting the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes watermain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads where possible and harmonization to properties, concrete work including sidewalks, the undergrounding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light (FPL), AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and large pump stations to discharge into Biscayne Bay. Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance of traffic had to be carefully monitored at all times. Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents is minimized. davidmartinez4miamibPachfl.gov St nrec 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Design Criteria Professional - Sunset Islands 3 and 4 Miami Bea:h, FL Stantec served as Design Criteria Professional and Resident Project Representative for this design/build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and combatting the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes watermain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads in some areas and harmonization to properties, concrete work including valley gutters and driveways, the undergrounding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light (FPL), AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and one pump station for each island that discharge into Biscayne Bay. Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance of traffic had to be carefully monitored at all times. Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents is minimized. lninasamadi zimiamibeachfl.goy Stantec 1,3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Miami Beach West 29th Street Bridge Repairs Miami Beach, FL Our company was the Construction Administrator and Engineering Inspector for repairs to different elements of the existing bridge including cracks on underside of bridge, delaminations and spalls at beams and deck underside, repairs to exposed and damaged steel reinforcement, repair/replacement of control joints on bridge deck, and asphalt milling and resurfacing. This project was completed ahead of schedule and within budget. I joserivassmiamibeachf.gov Stantec ^:r' I -- 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Sunset Harbor Improvements Miami Beach, FL Stantec served as construction and engineering inspectors for this design build project located in the Sunset Harbour neighborhood of Miami Beach. Project limits are from Sunset Harbour Drive (Purdy Avenue) to Alton Road, between Dade Boulevard and 20 Street. This full infrastructure reconstruction project included rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer system, extensive upgrades to the stormwater system, replacement of watermains and water services, full roadway reconstruction, new street lighting system, sidewalks and ramps to comply with ADA standards, and landscaping. A major focus of the project is to eliminate tidal flooding being experienced as a result of sea level rise. To combat these issues, the roads were raised and new drainage systems were installed. The three existing pump stations were rehabilitated and expanded, and a fourth new station was installed. The project started in Spring of 2014 and is scheduled for final completion in summer of 2017. :..• 1 B :e PE, PhD C., e 1)5.673 7080 brucemowry@miamibeachFl.gov Stantec 1 34.`_. I ' 1,3. Minimum Qualifications Requiremenfis References Providing Professional CEI Services Pump Station North of Convention Center Miami Beach, FL Stantec was in charge of the coordination and inspections of all aspects of this new large stormwater pump station. The pump station was designed to handle large quantities of stormwater by connecting to a new 96" diameter reinforced HDPE drainage pipe. The station includes ajunction structure, dual treatment structures, wet well, overflow bypass and dissipater box. A total of four axial flow stainless steel pumps will transfer stormwater into the Collins Canal. A new FPL duct bank had to be provided to meet the power needs of the station. Responsibilities included ensuring all environmental controls were in place on a daily basis. i—is i_ _ ,lv-?f 1 3C. t,773 72CC 09)a )uissota4miamibeachf gov Stantec 1 3-! ,sus. ._ I C. :.. 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Zones 1 & 4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement Key Biscayne, FL Stantec provided engineering design services and construction administration for this project that includes the construction of sanitary sewers, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement including valves and appurtenances, and roadway/right-of- way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. In addition to observing the on-going work, digital pictures were taken at almost every visit to record the project progress. These pictures were then printed, labeled and included as part of the Inspector's Daily Construction Report and provided to the Village of Key Biscayne on a bi-weekly basis. By performing regular field observations, effective communication was established between the Construction Administrators, Engineers, Contractor, and Owner. tbrown?kevbiscavne.A.us Stantec 1.3, Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Zones 2-3 Reclaimed Water & Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer, Key Biscayne, FL Stantec is providing engineering design services and construction administration for Zones 2 & 3 which are West of Crandon Boulevard. The boundaries for Zones 2 & 3 are approximately: Harbor Drive to the West, West Mashta Drive to the South, West Heather Drive to the North, and Fernwood Road to the East. The work includes the construction of sanitary sewers, manholes, pump station, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement and reclaimed water main including valves and appurtenances, and roadway right-of-way restoration, and other related work. In addition to observing the on-going work, digital pictures were taken at almost every visit to record the project progress. These pictures were then printed, labeled and included as part of the Inspector's Daily Construction Report and provided to the Village of Key Biscayne on a bi-weekly basis. By performing regular field observations, effective communication was established between the Construction Administrators, Engineers, Contractor, and Owner. • tbrown kevbiscavne fl uS Stantec 1.3, Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Reclaimed Water Distribution System Key Bscayne, FL Stantec provided construction administration services for civil/site work, including site clearing, earthwork and grading, paving, reclaimed water mains including services, valves and appurtenances, landscaping and roadway/ right-of-way restoration. The reclaimed water distribution system was installed from the northern Village limits running south, primarily along Fernwood Road, to West Mashta Drive. The project included the installation of service lines and meter boxes for future use. 1 , _ Teiec ;�-,, 1 3r 355 5i 1 jpilberf4kevbi<cavne.Fl.0 Stantec _ : I 2003 - 2CC,9 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Dog Park at Village Green Key Biscayne, FL Our firm was selected by the Village of Key Biscayne to provide architectural and engineering design services for a new 22,000 square foot dog park. The park will be divided for large dogs and small dogs and includes various site improvements. The improvements include artificial turf throughout, a decorative entrance trellis, fencing, decorative benches and umbrellas, pathways, water fountains, spray hydrants, heavy landcaping, irrigation, drainage, grading, and site lighting. We incorporated the placement of trees to augment the current planting and lower level shrubs to help keep the dogs from distraction by activities of the adjacent park while still affording safety and visibility to the dog's owners. Our services included the planning, cost estimating, design, permitting, and construction support. T �C rrj�F• 1 305 3.-')5 .39C8 1 jkurlancheelc kevbiscavne Fl gov Stantec 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services i • —I G 1 GE ST.N1E:PEST MASTER .a '3l3LIICN MA. NS p11..V Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and Pipeline System Design, Pinecres, FL This project included the planning and final design of over 27 miles of water main improvements to complete the potable water system of the Village of Pinecrest - within a three square mile residential area. The homes in the project area were on wells, and lacking a public water supply system and fire protection. The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system. Public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the work and cost involved in the project. The ductile iron water mains installed ranged in size from 8" diameter to 16" diameter. The first two phases of these improvements have been permitted and constructed. The first phase included approximately 35,000 linear feet of 12" diameter and 16" diameter backbone water main for the area, along the section line and half -section line roadways. The second phase of the improvements included approximately 12,000 linear feet of 8" water main in single family residential neighborhoods. All project areas were fully restored and the roadways were completely resurfaced. The project was jointly funded by the Village of Pinecrest and Miami Dade County, and the systems were donated to MDWASD upon completion, certification and acceptance. vgaliano4oinecrest-fl qov Stantec 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services VILLAGE OF PINECREST FOUR YEAR CAPITAL IPIPROVEMENT PAVING PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Pavement Evaluation and Fou Rehabilitation Plan, Pinecres, FL Year Maintenance & Stantec developed Pavement Management System (PMS) for approximately 120 miles of Village owned road. Automated field data of pavement distresses were collected with Stantec's RT3000 vehicle and loaded into MicroPaver to determine Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is a subjective method of evaluating distresses in pavement by providing a numerical rating between 0 and 100 where 0 is worst and 100 is best condition. Utilizing MicroPaver, prediction/deterioration models were developed to predict future pavement conditions and identify Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) projects. Stantec completed a final report which included a strategic Four -Year M&R work plan and a budget analysis to address these projects. The recommended projects were integrated into a Village map using GIS which was presented to the Village Council for approval. 1 3C rnsocr ioll:aoinecrest-A.gov Stantec 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Belie Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage Improvements, Golden Beach, FL Belle Meade is an 80 -acre, single family, residential neighborhood located in the northeastern portion of the City of Miami adjacent to Biscayne Bay. Over the years, problems with the inadequate drainage infrastructure, tidally influenced groundwater, site elevation, and deteriorating streets created a condition of moderate to severe flooding in the area. Stantec performed a drainage study and best alternative drainage solutions for the Belle Meade area. The model was run and calibrated based on existing conditions. Design iterations were then input into the system and evaluated against the City's design criteria. The final design recommendation was a 120 cfs pump station with approximately 4,000 feet of collection system assisted by exfiltration trenches in the higher elevation areas. Following the study, we provided the design and permitting of the drainage and streetscape improvements encompassing several miles of road in a developed flood -prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and storm water treatment units and discharging through a large stormwater pump station to the Little River Canal. Permitting included pre/post ICPR computer model and stage calculations for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. Additional permitting included SFWMD and ALOE for discharge into navigable waters. Stantec served as the prime consultant for both design and construction oversight. Stantec coordinated all sub consultant activities. Challenges included construction during the rainy season while maintaining positive outfall for the neighborhood. This project was extremely successful, for the first time in the life of this historic residential neighborhood, the streets do not flood during high tide events. ,a 1 jlago amiamigov corn Stantec 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Florida International University - Wastewater System SSES, I&I Elimination and Pump Station Upgrades, Miami, FL FIU operates a wastewater collection, pumping and transmission system comprised of 10 pumping stations. Nine pumping stations are at the Modesto Maidique main campus and another station is at the Engineering Campus. These 10 pump station areas comprise approximately 36,000 lineal feet of gravity pipes, 170 manholes and 6,500 lineal feet of force mains. In order to comply with the Miami -Dade County DERM Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance, FIU requested our assistance with managing and performing studies, design, and construction management of a system- wide comprehensive program to upgrade the wastewater system. The program consisted of preparing and implementing a facilities master plan of improvements to the wastewater system to determine the conditions of the entire system, conducting studies to determine what repairs and improvements were necessary, prioritizing and programming the improvements, and providing adequate capacity at its two master pumping stations to allow for future growth. Master planning and programming the wastewater system improvements at both the 360 -acre Modesto Maidique Campus and the 35 -acre Engineering and Applied Sciences Campus. The work was initially associated with the University's compliance with the Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance (VSCO), requiring the University to perform SSES and I&I reduction, and to report on the amount of reduction achieved by Nov. 12, 2012. Two of the 10 pump stations exhibited greater than 5,000 gpd of I&I at the start of the program. Eliminating a substantial amount of the I&I early allowed the entire collection system to come into compliance with the VSCO, and allowed construction of the pumping stations to proceed with confirmation of what the tributary flows would be, without need for oversizing the pumps. Design of the two master pump station improvements followed the I&I work, and final hydraulic calculations were completed based on existing and future campus demands and the reduced I&I being experienced. Daniel.oaan fiu.edu Strintec • 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Crandon Boulevard Master Plan and Streetscape Improvements, Key Biscayne, FL This Master Planning project involved improvements to the "Main Street" of the Village of Key Biscayne. This four -lane divided county road cuts through the heart of the community and is heavily traveled by residents, visitors to Bill Baggs State Park, and county transit buses. The road is also the most heavily traveled bicycle corridor in Miami -Dade County and has a high level of pedestrian use. The project goals were improved public safety; easing of traffic congestion; traffic calming; pedestrianization; improved mass transit; and streetscape beautification. Master plan improvements included the addition of bicycle lanes; widening of sidewalks; narrowing of travel lanes; curbing the outside edges of road; tightening of curb radii; full reconstruction of intersections to create paver plazas; construction of bus shelters and bus bays; improvements to signalization systems; improvements to lighting; landscaping, and street furniture. The improvements were completed in three phases and funded through a variety of state and county sources, including FDOT LAP funds. This project provided the Village with a reference for the traffic and public safety impacts of future development or redevelopment of properties fronting Crandon Boulevard and its side streets. As part of the Crandon Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan, public pocket plazas were designed and incorporated into the overall design of the street. These pocket plazas were introduced to create areas of rest for the pedestrians and as well as create an opportunity for Art in Public Places. Local artists took advantage of the opportunity and created beautiful plazas for the community reflecting the laid back elegant feel of the island. jkurlancheek alkevbiscavne.fl.iov Pante,: 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Pavement Evaluation Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program, Cutler Bay, FL Our firm was retained by the Town of Cutler Bay to perform an inventory and assessment of the pavement and sidewalk condition in the public right -of ways within the corporate Town limits. This study provides an inventory of the pavement and categorizes the condition based on cracks, raveling, pot holes, ruts, and patches. The improvements for the damaged pavement consisted of asphalt overlay and were organized based primarily on the Town's funding. Additional criteria for pavement improvements were based on the proposed Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Management Improvements and the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program that was established by Miami Dade County Public Works (MDCPW) and Miami Dade County Public School (MDCPS). Sidewalk areas that required ADA ramps or that were damaged within the designated SRTS were also included within the additional criteria for improvement. The sidewalk conditions were categorized by the various damages which included light, heavy, root and tripping hazards. Improvements for the sidewalk were based primarily on the Town's funding and prioritizing based on the areas with root damage and tripping hazards. The data collected for the pavement and sidewalk assessment were identified by zones as defined by our company. All collected data was integrated with aerial images of the Town using Geographic Information System (GIS) and further analyzed. I aauinterocutlerbav-Fl gov Stantec 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Roadway & Assessment Neighborhood Renaissance Program Paving Project, Cora! Gables, FL Our company was selected for the City wide assessment of approximately 240 miles of pavement condition in the public rights -of ways within the City limits. A condition rating was assigned to each roadway section and the recommended streets to be improved were integrated into a City aerial map using GIS. This map was reviewed analyzed with City staff and eventually served as the City's Pavement Capital Improvement Plan. Using this Capital Improvement Plan, construction documents which included 11x17 plans, specifications, project manual • and cost estimates were developed in two phases for resurfacing and rehabilitation. Other responsibilities include attendance of Pre -Bid conference, review and tabulate bids and prepare recommendation for award; Attend Pre -Construction conference and answer contractor's RFI's and issue clarifications as needed. Perform periodic project inspections to check for general conformance with contract documents and final inspection andpunch list. 1 Pnino,acnrrilgnbles corn Stant., 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Kerdyk Tennis Center Coral Gables, FL This project involves renovation and improvements to the existing Kerdyk Tennis Center next to the Biltmore Hotel. Stantec completed final construction documents and permitting for the following scope of work: parking lot reconstruction including new curbing, new monument sign, site lighting, irrigation, landscaping, electrical enclosure, decorative concrete walkway, a crosswalk on Anastasia Avenue, new fencing, tennis court resurfacing and re -striping including new nets, and new stadium style lighting for the courts. A second phase of improvements is in the planning stages and will involve a new or renovation building to serve the facility. Qninnkacornlgnbles.corn Pante,: c:,m.c a -c' tic's I . - _.. 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Golden Beach A1A - Utility Underground Conversion of Overhead Facilities to Underground, Golden Beach, FL The Town of Golden Beach decided to underground all existing overhead facilities within the town's municipal boundaries. Approximately five years ago the first phase was completed with the conversion of the southwest area of Town and the ocean side of AlA, consisting of a total of approximately 80 residences. The remainder of the Town's overhead infrastructure is currently being converted to underground in three phases (approximately 100 homes per phase). These improvements are being made in conjunction with roadway beautification including new sidewalks, entrance features, lighting, landscaping, and irrigation. Stantec and Skyline Management are serving as Project Engineers and Administrators as well as the Owner's Representative in coordinating all of the work with FPL, AT&T and Atlantic Broadband. • Stante: • alexdic golcfenbeach.ul 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services Golden Beach Capital Improvements Project Golden Beach, FL The resort -like community of Golden Beach is one of the most desirable in South Florida. This upscale community is home to many celebrities and multi-million dollar residences—in fact, even Eric Clapton named his album 461 Ocean Boulevard after a Golden Beach property! With the community's reputation in mind, we designed a project to increase the community's infrastructure and aesthetic value. We developed a comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan focused on three major improvement areas: town -wide drainage, utilities underground relocation, and streetscape & traffic calming. Drainage improvements included design review, costs analysis, and recommendations based on the Town's existing stormwater master plan. This included construction inlets and culverts to collect and direct stormwater runoff to pumping stations discharging into the intracoastal waterway. Utilities Underground Relocation improvements included a thorough analysis of the Town's existing power system configuration, and close coordination with FPL and other utility companies in developing a conceptual plan for burying all utility transmission and distribution lines throughout the entire Town. We redefined and enhanced the Town's major thoroughfares and side to increase public safety, and improve the quality of life and aesthetic appeal. Improvements included highlighting intersections with concrete pavers and crosswalks, delineating of roadways with valley edge gutters, construction of traffic splitter islands and center median with new landscaping, and new lighting. 1 alexdiozgoldenbench.u4 Stantec I • 1.3. Minimum Qualifications Requirements References Providing Professional CEI Services P_. Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements (Phases 1-5) Palmetto Bay, FL Our company performed field surveying, design, permitting, bidding, and construction administration of drainage improvements at various locations throughout the Village. The Village's stormwater master plan identified and prioritized areas with flooding problems. Many areas had no existing drainage while others had old, ineffective systems. Each phase of construction included the installation of drainage structures, exfiltration trenches, connections to the existing systems, and associated restoration. Each project has successfully implemented much needed drainage improvements. The improvements were funded by stormwater utility money and grants through. FDEP. -= ,' coatterson Eb.oalmettobav-Fl.gov Stantec Experience and Qualifications 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Firm History Relevant Experience 2.2. Qualifications of Proposer Team Organizational Chart Resumes 2.3. Financial Capacity !TY PR��i'ESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION CEl _`4G,N ,ER!NG AND INSPECTION lAm i FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS 0E1 SE<° IC,ES ON AN 'AS NEEDED" BASIS BEACH 2017 -028 -KB Stantec 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Firm History We're active members of the communities we serve. That's why at Stantec, we always design with community in mind. Who we are Stantec, founded in 1954, provides professional consulting services in planning, engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, surveying, geotechnical, environmental sciences, project management, and project economics for infrastructure and facilities projects. Continually striving to balance economic, environmental, and social responsibilities, we are recognized as a world-class leader and innovator in the delivery of sustainable solutions. We support public and private sector clients in a diverse range of markets at every stage, from the initial conceptualization and financial feasibility study to project completion and beyond. Stantec has over 22,000 people in more than 400 locations firmwide. With 200 offices and 7,600+ people in the US alone, chances are there's a Stantec presence right where you need us to be. More specifically, we have 18 offices within the State of Florida including our local Coral Gables office to aid in this contract. Stantec's strong commitment to client satisfaction is the foundation of our service to you. We have a long history of serving municipal and county government clients throughout the state. Qualifications and Capabilities Stantec is familiar and comfortable with providing services for any type of project—be it big or small; our group is deliberately configured to be flexible and adaptable for a variety of client requirements. Since 1954, our local strength, knowledge, and relationships have allowed us to go anywhere to meet our clients' needs in more creative and personalized ways. With a long-term commitment to the people and places we serve, Stantec has the unique ability to connect to projects on a personal level and advance the quality of life in communities across the globe. We believe Stantec presents a team second to none in terms of the depth of local (and global) resources available, understanding of the requirements of this exciting contract, the technical expertise and management team to deliver successful projects on time and within budget, but also understanding and working with the City of Miami Beach including residents and stakeholders. This is our home and we are proud of our track record in working closely with local municipalities for the upgrade, expansion, and preservation of our community's infrastructure. As a national integrated engineering and architecture practice, Stantec is a recognized innovator and industry leader with specific expertise in civic design for all levels of government—municipal, provincial and federal. The firm is committed to excellence and innovation in all aspects of the practice. We support our public and private sector clients at every stage, from initial concept and financial feasibility, to project completion and beyond. The firm holds a fundamental belief in the involvement of the client and users in the entire design process. As integral members of the team, our clients contribute greatly to the energy and enthusiasm that produce the highest quality work. A characteristic of Stantec's work is the uniqueness of each design solution, achieved by beginning each design process without preconceptions. Crucial to the success of the contract will be a strong management team; a clear and consistent communications strategy; and a thorough understanding of the roles and responsibility of each member of the Proponent Team. The Project/Client Manager, Sean Compel, PE, LEED AP will be the conduit for all communications between the City of Miami Beach and the team . Formal documentation and contact with the City will be through Sean. On a day to day basis, all client/consultant team members may be in contact for various reasons; any such communication will be recorded and filed with the Project Manager to ensure management accountability to the City of Miami Beach. Stantec 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Firm History At Stantec we are passionate about the design quality of the built environment. We create designs that are timeless, intelligent, and sustainable. We work collaboratively, matching knowledge and experience to client and community goals. Our practice extends from macro to micro—from master planning to architectural and interior design—throughout the life cycle of a project. Our team enjoys a reputation for creating high-performance, fiscally responsible, and award-winning projects. Stantec is consistently ranked amongst leading national and internationally recognized firms, as described by various publications as well as professional and peer organizations. The following rankings denote our position by the Engineering News Record (ENR) in April, 2016. #18 Top 500 Design Firms #10 Top 20 Design Firms - General Buildings #10 Top 20 Design Firms - Water #11 Top 20 Design Firms - Transportation Our highly -skilled personnel are specialists who not only look at what to do, but why, so that decisions are made in an informed environment. Our team is comprised of experts in their field, able and ready to work on this project right away. Stantec is committed to utilizing state-of-the-art technology to ensure that our clients receive the most innovative and creative design solutions. This strategy keeps our designers at the forefront of the industry, leading by example rather than following the lead of others. Stantec We will reach our full potential by combining our unique strengths. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Design Criteria Professional - Palm and Hibiscus Islands Miami Beach, FL Agency Name,: C;, -.c ManiBe.~. 1 Agency Contra eonone: 3 E-rnciii: davidmartinezmiamibeachfl.qov Year and Term of Engoce Stantec served as Design Criteria Professional and Resident Project Representative for this design/ build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and combatting the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes waterrnain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of -the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads -where possible and harmonization to properties, concrete work including sidewalks, the undergroun ding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light .(FPL, AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and large pump stations to discharge into Biscayne Bay. Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance .0ft:raffle had to be carefully monitored at all times. :Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents fts minimized. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Design Criteria Professional - Sunset Islands 3 and 4 Miami Beach, FL 2i c'_i _ _ _ Agency Contact: ; ,1 _. _ „_ r minasamadimiamibeachfl goy Stantec served as Design Criteria Professional and Resident Project Representative for this design/ build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and combatting the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes watermain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads in some areas and harmonization to properties, concrete work including valley gutters and driveways, the undergrounding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light (FPL), AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and one pump station for each island that discharge into Biscayne Bay, Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance of traffic had to be carefully monitored at all times. Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents is minimized. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Miami Beach West 29th Street Bridge Repairs Miami Beaoh, FL Beccn 1 Agency Contact: _ r!' _•:. _ = J;ro joservas'^miamibeachfl,gov l Yearand Term of cngau_ Our company was the Construction Administrator and Engineering Inspector for repairs to different elements of the existing bridge including cracks on underside of bridge, delaminations and spalls at beams and deck underside, repairs to exposed and damaged steel reinforcement, repair/replacement of control joints on bridge deck, and asphalt milling and resurfacing. This project was completed ahead of schedule and within budget. r2,3 2 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Sunset Harbor Improvements Miami Beach, FL Agency (Name: ! r of ijm.i Beach 1 .4"�nC,`i brucemowry@miamibeachfl.gov •'orcn_I _ Enc1reer- 2O 1 4-2C17 Stantec served as construction and engineering inspectors for this design build project located in the Sunset Harbour neighborhood of Miami Beach. Project limits are from Sunset Harbour Drive (Purdy Avenue) to Alton Road, between Dade Boulevard and 20 Street. This full infrastructure reconstruction project included rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer system, extensive upgrades to the stormwater system, replacement of watermains and water services, full roadway reconstruction, new street lighting system, sidewalks and ramps to comply with ADA standards, arid landscaping. A major focus of the project is to eliminate tidal flooding being experienced as a result of sea level rise. To combat these issues, the roads were raised and new drainage systems were installed. The three existing:pump stations were rehabilitated and expandecl, and a fourth new station was installed. The project started in Spring of 2014 and is scheduled for final completion in summer of 2017. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record 87°E (T) I 25°47'51'N, 80°7'58"W ±10m 222°SW (T) • 25°47'52"N, 80°7'57"W ±10 Pump Station North of Convention Center Miami Beach, FL 3c luissota@miamibeachfl.aov - Irl f' 2C,16 -2C.17 Stantec was in charge of the coordination and inspections of all aspects of this new large storrnwater pump station. The pump station was designed to handle large quantities of stormwater by connecting to a new 96" diameter reinforced HDPE drainage pipe. The station includes ajunction structure, dual treatment structures, wet well, overflow bypass and dissipater box. A total of four axial flow stainless steel pumps will transfer storrnwater into the Collins Canal. A new FPL duct bank had to be provided to meet the power needs of the station. Responsibilities included ensuring all environmental controls were in place on a daily basis. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Zones 2-3 Reclaimed Water & Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer, Key Biscayne, FL r_... tbrown4kevbiscavn.fl.1is ; :, _ r = _ 008 Stantec is providing engineering design services and construction administration for Zones 2 & 3 which are West of Crandon Boulevard. The boundaries for Zones 2 & 3 are approximately: Harbor Drive to the West, West Mashta Drive to the South, West Heather Drive to the North, and Fernwood Road to the East. The work includes the construction of sanitary sewers, manholes, pump station, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement and reclaimed water main including valves and appurtenances, and roadway right-of-way restoration, and other related work. In addition to observing the on-going work, digital pictures were taken at almost every visit to record the project progress. These pictures were then printed, labeled and included as part of the Inspector's Daily Construction Report and provided to the Village of Key Biscayne on a bi-weekly basis. By performing regular field observations, effective communication was established between the Construction Administrators, Engineers, Contractor, and Owner. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Zones 1 & 4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement Key Biscayne, FL 7Dn, tbrown4kevbisca\ine.fl,us or Engagenient: Stantec provided engineering design services and construction administration for this project that includes the construction of sanitary sewers, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement including valves and appurtenances, and road-way/right-of-way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. In addition to observing the on-going work, digital pictures were taken at almost every visit to record the project progress. These pictures were then printed, labeled and included as part of the Inspector's Daily Construction Report and provided to the Village of Key Biscayne on a bi-weekly basis. By performing regular field observations, effective communication was established between the Construction Administrators, Engineers, Contractor, and Owner. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Reclaimed Water Distribution System Key Biscayne, FL F jgilbert akevbiscavne.fl.0 - - 33 a = _ __. 2CC9-=0C Stantec provided construction administration services for civil/site work, including site clearing, earthwork and grading, paving, reclaimed water mains including services, valves and appurtenances, landscaping and roadway/right-of-way restoration. The reclaimed water distribution system was installed from the northern Village limits running south, primarily along Fernwood Road, to West Mashta Drive. The project included the installation of service lines and meter boxes for future use. 2.1, Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Dog Park at Village Green Key Biscayne, FL •;yency .,r Kc, Bs:ovne I .agency Cc T-?Iec,none; ?i' ; , - �.39i;€ = _ii : jkurlancheek'aevbiscavne.fl uov Our firm was selected by the Village of Key Biscayne to provide architectural and engineering design services for a new 22,000 square foot dog park. The park will be divided for large dogs and small dogs and includes various site improvements. The improvements include artificial turf throughout, a decorative entrance trellis, fencing, decorative benches and umbrellas, pathways, water fountains, spray hydrants, heavy landcaping, irrigation, drainage, grading, and site lighting. We incorporated the placement of trees to augment the current planting and lower level shrubs to help keep the dogs from distraction by activities of the adjacent park while still affording safety and visibility to the dog's owners. Our services includedthe planning, cost estimating, design, permitting, and construction support. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record a LGE 7F'1'NE:R°$T NA5TEF fl .[C'(3LTICN Mk S ?�J.,V Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and Pipeline System Design, Pinecres, FL _ = �✓ Name. ',/ ilage Precresi A ency Corh ot: Y _,� r _, �, r� -c �e_. `✓`II7� _ - _ - 305.234.2121, vgalianotoinecrest-fl.gov :. - This project included the planning and final design of over 27 miles of water main improvements to complete the potable water system of the Village of Pinecrest - within a three square mile residential area. The homes in the project area were on wells, and lacking a public water supply system and fire protection. The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system. Public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the work and cost involved in the project. The ductile iron water mains installed ranged in size from 8" diameter to 16" diameter. The first two phases of these improvements have been permitted and constructed. The first phase included approximately 35,000 linear feet of 12" diameter and 16" diameter backbone water main for the area, along the section line and half -section line roadways. The second phase of the improvements included appromUnately 12,000 linear feet of 8" water main in single family residential neighborhoods. All project areas were fully restored and the roadways were completely resurfaced. The project was jointly funded by the Village of Pinecrest and Miami Dade County, and the systems were donated to MDWASD upon completion, certification and acceptance. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record VILLAGE OF PV,JECREST FOUR YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PAVING PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Is. >sorra ,_a Pavement Evaluation and Four Year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Plan, Pinecres, FL A, = :`! Name: - :eof Pi-._ _rest Agency -:ct: Mark Sodric i. re __ e: _ : = =.:591 I E -r^ . msoaniolil . oinecrest-fl:gov r and r • Enaac ,,_. - 2014 - Ongoing Stantec developed Pavement Management System (PMS) for approximately 120 miles of Village owned road. Automated field data of pavement distresses were collected with Stantec's RT3000 vehicle and loaded into MicroPaver to determine Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is a subjective method of evaluating distresses in pavement by providing a numerical rating between 0 and 100 where 0 is worst and 100 is best condition. Utilizing MicroPaver, prediction /deterioration models were developed to predict future pavement conditions and identify Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) projects. Stantec completed a final report which included a strategic Four -Year M&R work plan and a budget analysis to address these projects. The recommended projects were integrated into a Village map using GIS which was presented to the Village Council for app:roval. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Belle Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage Improvements, Golden Beach, FL Agency NairAce7::„ jlago4miamigov.com -3r Belle Meade is an 80 -acre, single family, residential neighborhood located in the northeastern portion of the City of Miami adjacent to Biscayne Bay. Over the years, problems with the inadequate drainage infrastructure, tidally influenced groundwater, site elevation, and deteriorating streets created a condition of moderate to severe flooding in the area. Stantec performed a drainage study and best .alternative drainage solutions for the Belle Meade area. The model was run and calibrated based on existing conditions, Design iterations were then input into the system and evaluated against the City's design criteria. The final design recommendation was a 120 cfs pump station with approximately 4,000 feet of collection system assisted by exfiltration trenches in the higher elevation areas. Following the study, we provided the design and permitting of the drainage and streetscape improvements encompassing several miles ofroad iri a developed flood -prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and storm water treatment units and discharging through a large stormwater pump station to the Little River Canal. Permitting included pre/post ICPR computer model and stage calculations for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. Additional permitting included SFWMD and AC OE for discharge into navigable waters. Stantec served as the prime consultant for both design and construction oversight. Stantec coordinated all' sub consultant activities. Challenges included construction during the rainy season while maintaining positive outfall for the neighborhood. This project was extremely successful, for the first time in the life of this historic residential neighborhood, the streets do not flood during high tide events. _ _(._..:+., 1. :,a 1. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Florida International University - Wastewater System SSSS, 1&I Elimination and Pump Station Upgrades, Mame, FL Agency Name: er I Cor.t.ct. 3enfor 305 = Daniel.oaan fiu.edu = _ - FIIJ operates a wastewater collection, pumping and transmission system comprised of 10 pumping stations. Nine pumping stations are at the Modesto Maidique main campus and another station is at the Engineering Campus. These 10 pump station areas comprise approximately 36,000 lineal feet of gravity pipes, 170 manholes and 6,500 lineal feet of force mains. In order to comply with the Miami -Dade County DERM Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance, FIll requested our assistance with managing and performing studies, design, and construction management of a system -wide comprehensive program to upgrade the wastewater system. The program consisted of preparing and implementing a facilities master plan of improvements to the wastewater system to determine the conditions of the entire system, conducting studies to determine what repairs and improvements were necessary, prioritizing and programming the improvements, and providing adequate capacity at its two master pumping stations to allow for future growth. Master planning and programming the wastewater system improvements at both the 360 -acre Modesto Maidique Campus and the 35 -acre Engineering and Applied Sciences Campus. The work was initially associated with the University's compliance with the Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance (VSCO), requiring the University to perform SSES and I&I reductio:n, and to report on the amount of reduction achieved by Nov. 12, 2012. Two of the 10 pump stations exhibited greater than 5,000 gpd of I &I at the start of the program. Eliminating a substantial :amount of the I&I early allowed the entire collection system to come into compliance with the VSCO, and -allowed construction of the pumping stations to proceed with confirmation of what the tributary flows would be, without need for oversizing the pumps. Design of the two master pump station improvements followed the I&I work, and final hydraulic calculations were completed based on existing and future campus demands and the reduced I&I being experienced. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Crandon Boulevard Master Plan and Streetscape Improvements, Kay- Biscayne, FL .a._ e 1 :; Contact. - jkuriancheek@keybiscavne.Pl.gov This Master Planning project involved improvements to the "Main Street" of the Village of Key Biscayne. This four -lane divided county road cuts through the heart of the community and is heavily traveled by residents, visitors to Bill Beggs State Park, and county transit buses. The road is also the most heavily traveled bicycle corridor in Miami -Dade County and has a high level of pedestrian use. The project goals were improved public safety; easing of traffic congestion; traffic calming; pedestrianization; improved mass transit; and streetscape beautification. Master plan improvements included the addition of bicycle lanes; widening of sidewalks; narrowing of travel lanes; curbing the outside edges of road; tightening of curb radii; full reconstruction of intersections to create paver plazas; construction of bus shelters and bus bays; improvements to signalivation systems; improvements to lighting; landscaping, and street furniture. The improvements were completed in three phases and funded through a variety of state and county sources, including FDOT LAP funds. This project provided the Village with a reference for the traffic and public safety impacts of future development or redevelopment of properties fronting Crandon Boulevard and its side streets. As part of the Crandon Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan, public pocket plazas were designed and incorporated into the overall design of the street. These pocket plazas were introduced to create areas of rest for the pedestrians and .as well as create an opportunity for Art in Public Places. Local artists took advantage of the opportunity and created beautiful plazas for the community reflecting the laid back elegant feel of the island. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Pavement Evaluation Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program, Cutler Bay, FL aauinterot_cutterbav-fl.gov 2009 - O _ Our firm was retained by the Town of Cutler Bay to perform an inventory and assessment of the pavement and sidewalk condition in the public right -of ways within the corporate Town limits. This study provides an inventory of the pavement and categorizes the condition based on cracks, raveling, pot holes, ruts, and patches. The improvements for the damaged pavement consisted of asphalt overlay and were organized based primarily on the Town's funding. Additional criteria for pavement improvements were based on the proposed Town of Cutler Bay Stormwater Management improvements and the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program that was established by Miami Dade County Public Works (MDCPW) and Miami Dade County Public School (MDCPS). Sidewalk areas that required .ADA ramps or that were damaged within the designated SRTS were also included within the additional criteria for improvement. The sidewalk conditions were categorized by the various damages which included light, heavy, root and tripping hazards. Improvements :for the sidewalk were based primarily on the TOV77.n's funding and prioritizing based on the areas vrith :root damage and tripping hazards. The data collected for the pavement and sidewalk assessment were identified by zones as defined by our company. All collected data was integrated with aerial images of the Town using Geographic Information System (GIS) and further analyzed. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Roadway & Assessment Neighborhood Renaissance Program Paving Project, Coral Gables, FL - Coral G bye; Agency r _ 305s,: eoino@coralgables.com _rr.^. Piro 2002 - 2013 Our company was selected for the City wide assessment of approximately 240 miles of pavement condition in the public rights -of ways within the City limits. A condition rating was assigned to each roadway section and the recommended streets to be improved were integrated into a City aerial map using GIS. This map was reviewed analyzed with City staff and eventually served as the City's Pavement Capital Improvement Plan. Using this Capital Improvement Plan, construction documents which included 11x17 plans, specifications, project manual and cost estimates were developed in two phases for resurfacing and rehabilitation.. Other responsibilities include attendance of Pre -Bid conference, review and tabulate bids and prepare recommendation for award; Attend Pre -Construction conference and answer contractor's RFI's and issue clarifications as needed. Perform periodic project inspections to check for general conformance with contract documents and final inspection and punch list. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Kerdyk Tennis Center Coral Gables, FL Ernesro Piro.. A , -)ino, coralgables.corn ' Yecr onc Tern of Engage - This project involves renovation and improvements to the existing Kerdyk Tennis Center next to the Biltmore Hotel. Stantec completed final construction documents and permitting for the following scope of work parking lot reconstruction including new curbing, new monument sign, site lighting, irrigation, landscaping, electrical enclosure, decorative concrete waLkway, a crosswalk on Anastasia Avenue, new fencing, tennis court resurfacing and re -striping including new nets, and new stadium style lighting for the courts. A second phase of improvements is in the planning stages and will involve a new or renovation building to serve the facility. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Golden Beach A1A - Utility Underground Conversion of Overhead Facilities to Underground, Golden Beach, FL Agency Name: To''- . C,` O ,je 9 e:c Dia' own Manage E ohone. E-mail: alexdiarEgoldenbeach.Years and Term of Engagement: 2009 - 20'0 The Town of Golden Beach decided to underground all existing overhead facilities within the town's municipal boundaries. Approximately five years ago the first phase was completed with the conversion of the southwest area of Town and the ocean side of A1A, consisting of a total of approximately 80 residences. The remainder of the Town's overhead infrastructure is currently being converted to underground in three phases (approximately 100 homes per phase). These improvements are being made in conjunction with roadway beautification including new sidewalks, entrance features, lighting, landscaping, and irrigation. Stantec and Skyline Management are serving as Project Engineers and Administrators as well as the Owner's Representative in coordinating all of the work with FPL, AT&T and Atlantic Broadband. 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Golden Beach Capital Improvements Project Golden Beach, FL Agency. Name r Cl;' _._ CIS t: E mail: alexdiar§goldenbeach,us u. and Term of Engagement: 2"::C8 - , 305 932 C The resort -like community of Golden Beach is one of the most desirable in South Florida. This upscale community is home to many celebrities and multi- million dollar residences—in fact, even Eric Clapton named his album 461 Ocean Boulevard after a Golden Beach property! With the community's reputation in mind, we designed a project to increase the community's infrastructure and aesthetic value. We developed a comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan focused on three major improvement areas: town -wide drainage, utilities underground relocation, and streetscape & traffic calming. Drainage improvements included design review, costs analysis, and recommendations based on the Town's existing stormwater master plan. This included construction inlets and culverts to collect and direct stormwater runoff to pumping stations discharging into the intracoastal waterway. Utilities Underground Relocation improvements included a thorough analysis of the Town's existing power system configuration, and close coordination with FPL and other utility companies in developing a conceptual plan for burying all utility transmission and distribution lines throughout the entire Town. We redefined and enhanced the Town's major thoroughfares and side to increase public safety, and improve the quality of life and aesthetic appeal. Improvements included highlighting intersections with concrete pavers and crosswalks, delineating of roadways with valley edge gutters, construction of traffic splitter islands and center median with new landscaping, and new lighting. 'catloni 2.1. Qualifications of Proposing Firm Relevant Experience & Proven Track Record Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements (Phases 1-5) Palmetto Bay, FL Agency N• -t --e: • attar na.almet+ .a„ 1 Year and Term of Engagement:2",1 1 - Our company performed field surveying, design, permitting, bidding, and construction administration of drainage improvements at various locations throughout the Village. The Village's stormwater master plan identified and prioritized areas with flooding problems. Many areas had no existing drainage while others had old, ineffective systems. Each phase of construction included the installation of drainage structures, ezdiltration trenches, connections to the existing systems, and associated restoration. Each project has successfully implemented much needed drainage improvements. The improvements were funded by stormwater utility money and grants through FDEP. 2.2. Qualifications of Proposer Team Organizational Chart Team IR Consultant Subconsultant AA/AC OFFICER Jeffrey Crews, PE, LEED AP PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Ramon CasteHa, PE, LEED AP PROJECT/CLIENT MANAGER Sean Compel, PE, LEED AP TA3 2. Experience & Qualifications We bring sear, creative, inspired people together. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION Carlos Herdocia, PE, LEED AP Senior Roadway Engineer Marion Medina, PE, CFM Stormwater Engineer Terrance Glunt, PE, SI, LEED AP Senior Project Engineer/ Cost Estimating /Value Engineering Pete McRae, PE Senior Project Engineer/ Construction Scheduling Dave Clarke, PE Senior Project Engineer/ Maintenance of Traffic Stantec CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS Gerard Hills Senior Inspector Fernando Vargas Senior Inspector Andy Alexander Senior Inspector Rene Brito Senior Inspector Ricardo Julien Senior Inspector Ahmed Albasri Inspector SUBCONSULTANT SUPPORT AS -NEEDED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING WingerterLabs, Inc. Robert Schuler, PE, PG Senior Geotechnical Engineer Leon Chin -You, BN Senior Geotechnical Engineer STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Pablo Garcia Structural Project Engineer PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Sandra Hodge Public Information Officer ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT Elvira Freire, AIA, LEED AP Senior Architect SURVEYING & MAPPING Longitude Surveyors, LLC Eduardo Suarez, PSM Senior Surveyor John Adler III, PSM Senior Surveyor 2.2. Qualifications of Proposer Team Resumes What kind of team does it take to provide you with the right combination of enthusiasm, qualifications, and experience for this contract? It takes a team that works together and is driven to achieve. At Stantec, we collaborate across disciplines and industries to bring projects to life. We are ready to be your project partner and meet your needs in a creative and personalized way. The key members of our team bring a diverse background and experience related to professional services. This combination of our unique strengths and passions, knowledge, and experiences makes it possible for us to deliver successful projects and advance the quality of life in our community. Stantec's team offers the city of Miami Beach a project team skilled and efficient in providing the professional and technical expertise required for the construction engineering and inspection services for the project. The Project Manager will select each of the proposed team members based on their particular expertise and the services areas identified in any Request for Proposal. This will result in immediate productivity and will reduce or eliminate any learning curve. In order to take full advantage of the lessons we have learned, and provide continuity, Stantec's team is comprised of many of the individuals that worked on the dozens of relevant projects. We are very proud of our staff, who bring our collective knowledge, experience, and imagination to every project. Please see our staff resumes attached. Resumes Sean Compel, PE, LEED AP Project/Client Manager Sean has over 15 years of experience in the planning, design, permitting and construction of civil engineering and site development projects. He has served as project construction administrator and project engineer for various roadway, drainage, water, sewer, underground electrical, and industrial projects. Clients include municipalities, state agencies, educational facilities, and private businesses. His experience in construction services has allowed him to effectively deliver projects satisfying all owner requirements. Responsibilities during construction include permitting, review of scheduling, and overall cost analysis. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 2002 Registrations Professional Engineer #66618, State of Florida Stantec Select project experience • Palm and Hibiscus Islands, Miami Beach, FL - Construction Aministrator for this project for which Stantec served as Design Criteria Professional and Resident Project Representative for this design/build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and combatting the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes watermain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads where possible and harmonization to properties, concrete work including sidewalks, the undergrounding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light (FPL), AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and large pump stations to discharge into Biscayne Bay. Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance of traffic had to be carefully monitored at all times. Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents is minimized. • 29th Street Bridge Repairs, Miami Beach, Florida - Construction Administrator for various structural repairs completed, which included spalling, cracking, and delineations. The heavily deteriorated beams, bents, and deck underside were fully rehabilitated. The bridge was fully operational during the entire duration of the project, and delivered ahead of schedule and within budget. • Sunset Harbor Improvements, Miami Beach, Florida - Construction Administrator for this project for which Stantec served as construction and engineering inspectors for this design build project located in the Sunset Harbour neighborhood of Miami Beach. Project limits are from Sunset Harbour Drive (Purdy Avenue) to Alton Road, between Dade Boulevard and 20 Street. This full infrastructure reconstruction project included rehabilitation of the existing sanitary sewer system, extensive upgrades to the stormwater system, replacement of watermains and water services, full roadway reconstruction, new street lighting system, sidewalks and ramps to comply with ADA standards, and landscaping. A major focus of the project is to eliminate tidal flooding being experienced as a result of sea level rise. To combat these issues, the roads were raised and new drainage systems were installed. The three existing pump stations were rehabilitated and expanded, and a fourth new station was installed. The project started in Spring of 2014 and is scheduled for final completion in summer of 2017. • Fisher Island Paving Improvements, Fisher Island, Florida - Project Engineer and Construction Administrator for various paving improvements at this exclusive island accessed only by ferry. Roadways here had not been paved in many years and various levels of deterioration were observed. The scope of work involved asphalt overlays where limited pavement damage was observed and milling and paving in areas with heavy cracking. An asphalt leveling course was provided in areas that displayed settling. During construction all equipment and asphalt trucks were brought over on barges and the work was successfully completed during the islands off-season months. • Golden Beach A1A Utility Underground Conversion of Overhead Facilities to Underground, Golden Beach, Florida - Construction Administrator for this project for which the Town of Golden Beach has decided to underground all existing overhead facilities within the town's municipal Sean Compel, PE, LEED AP Page 2 Resumes boundaries. Approximately five years ago the first phase was completed with the conversion of the southwest area of Town and the ocean side of AlA, consisting of a total of approximately 80 residences. The remainder of the Town's overhead infrastructure is currently being converted to underground in three phases (approximately 100 homes per phase). These improvements are being made in conjunction with roadway beautification and drainage improvements. The firm and Skyline Management are serving as Project Engineers and Administrators as well as the Owner's Representative in coordinating all of the work with FPL, AT&T and Atlantic Broadband. • Florida International University (FIU) System Evaluation Survey (SSES) Campuswide, Modesto Maidique Campus, Miami, FL - Construction Administrator for the implementation of the SSES, consisting of inventorying the existing gravity collection system, cleaning, TV inspection, and smoke testing of all the sanitary sewer lines, laterals, and manholes in nine pump station areas at the Modesto Maidique (University Park) Campus and the Computer Engineering and Applied Science Campus. Contractor surveyed approximately 40,000 linear feet (LF) of pipes, 152 manholes, and 280 laterals. At the time of the SSE S, FIU had approximately 220,000 gallons per day of infiltration and inflow (I&I). The purpose of the SSES was to determine the conditions and severity of defects requiring repairs. Plans and specifications are currently being prepared for the necessary system repairs, with phases corresponding to the priority of the repairs, based on the amount of I&I. In total, about one-fourth of the pipes and manholes require repairs and rehabilitation. The repair and rehabilitation workwas performed with ARRA funds in approximately 1/3 of the time allocated. Pay -back period in terms of savings from potential I&I reduction is estimated at under 5.0 years. • Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements, Palmetto Bay, FL - Project Engineer and Construction Administrator for the field surveying, design, permitting, bidding, and construction of drainage improvements at various locations throughout the Village. The Village's stormwater master plan identified and prioritized areas with flooding problems. Many areas had no existing drainage. Each phase of construction included the installation of drainage structures, exfiltration trenches, connections to the existing system, and associated restoration. All three phases of work were completed on schedule and under budget. • Indian Creek Village Entrance Improvements, Indian Creek, FL - Construction Administrator for the implementation of the first phase of the Master Plan. The plan identified critical concerns and built consensus among the Council Members and residents of the Village with respect to project scope and key design elements of proposed improvements and enhancements. These improvements include reconfiguration of the Village the entrance by tightening the corner radii, expanding the landscaped corners on either side, creating an oval landscaped island, and historically restoring of the existing Gate House. The main roadway into the Village will also be reconfigured by narrowing the travel lanes to 12 -feet, introducing of a center landscaped median, and a 5 ft. wide sidewalk for pedestrian and traffic safety. • Sunset Drive Improvements (West of US 1), South Miami, FL - Construction Administrator for this master planning project involving the development of conceptual streetscape and infrastructure improvements along Sunset Drive from. the western city limits to US 1. These include delineating intersections with concrete pavers and crosswalks, redefining roadways sections, and providing new lighting and landscape design to increase public safety and appeal. In addition, a new architectural site plan for City Hall was designed incorporating surrounding public spaces and facilities to create an enhanced civic and community space. The master plan was developed substantially in accordance with the City's Hometown Plan Area 2, and evaluated proposed improvements with respect to their feasibility, cost/benefit, design, and construction. In addition, the firm held three public workshops to collect public opinions and suggestions, and ensured the Master Plan was reflective of, and sensitive to the community. • Utilities Underground Relocation (Electrical, Telephone, Cable), Golden Beach, Florida - Construction Administrator for improvements which included a thorough analysis of the Town's existing power system configuration, and close coordination with FPL and other utility companies in developing a conceptual plan for burying all utility transmission and distribution lines throughout the entire Town. • Villagewide Paving CEI, Pinecrest, Florida- Construction Administrator for this multi-year paving program in which various streets were milled and resurfaced. Our scope included field assessments of existing ADA facilitates and compilation of paving plans to meet the Village's annual $1 million paving budget. During construction, our field inspector was on-site during all paving activities and assisted with field modifications throughout the work. Sfantec Resumes Ramon Castello, PE, LEED AP Principal in Charge Ramon has over 32 years of expertise in public and private infrastructure projects throughout Florida and the Caribbean. His engineering experience on these projects includes programming, planning, analysis, design, preparation of construction documents, construction administration and inspection and commissioning. His public works infrastructure project types include drainage, flood control, coastal construction, water and sewer systems, roads and bridges, public facilities, parks, project budgeting and grants acquisition. Education 13achelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 1985 Registrations Professional Engineer #40073, State of Florida LEED Accredited Professional, U.S. Green Building Council Sfantec Select project experience • Design & Construction Services for John F. Kennedy Causeway Redevelopment, North Bay Village, Florida - Principal in Charge for this project that involves the design and construction services for the redevelopment of the John F. Kennedy Causeway. The project will be implemented in several phases. Phase I will be the landscape design and construction of street beautification improvements to the western end of the Causeway. While this phase is being implemented, a conceptual master plan shall be prepared to address the complete beautification and redevelopment program for Kennedy Causeway which includes the roadway, adjacent business district, and the waterfront. • Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements, Palmetto Bay, Florida Principal in Charge for this project that involved field surveying, design, permitting, bidding, and construction administration of drainage improvements at 10 locations throughout the Village. These 10 areas were identified by the Village as having flooding problems. The improvements included new drainage structures, exfiltration trenches, outfalls, and asphalt overlays. The project was completed on schedule and under budget. • Sunset Drive Improvements (West of US 1), South Miami, Florida - Principal in Charge for this master planning project involving the development of conceptual streetscape and infrastructure improvements along Sunset Drive from the western city limits to US 1. These include delineating intersections with concrete pavers and crosswalks, redefining roadways sections, and providing new lighting and landscape design to increase public safety and appeal. In addition, a new architectural site plan for City Hall was designed incorporating surrounding public spaces and facilities to create an enhanced civic and community space. The master plan was developed substantially in accordance with the City's Hometown Plan Area 2, and evaluated proposed improvements with respect to their feasibility, cost/benefit, design, and construction. In addition, the firm held three public workshops to collect public opinions and suggestions, and ensured the Master Plan was reflective of, and sensitive to the community. • Crandon Boulevard Master Plan, Key Biscayne, FL - Principal in Charge of design for this project that takes an existing suburban style highway and transforms it into a center of community activities. By promoting the safe and secure transit of all types of vehicles and pedestrians, this CP TED -friendly design also serves to create a source of identity for the community connecting retail, residential, public parks and government facilities into a cohesive design. The project consisted of a master plan that encompassed the design for a 4 -lane divided road, improved public safety, easing of traffic congestion, traffic calming, pedestrianization, improved mass transit, streetscape improvements, sidewalks, lighting, and a roundabout. This project, divided into three phases, will provide the Village with a reference for the traffic and public safety impacts of future development or redevelopment of properties fronting Crandon Boulevard and its side streets. • Belle Meade Stormwater Pump Station and Drainage Improvements, Miami, FL - Principal in Charge of the civil portion of this $8 million project which consisted of the design and permitting of a drainage and streetscape improvement project encompassing several miles of road in a developed Resumes flood -prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and storm water treatment units and discharging through a large stormwater pump station to the Little River Canal. Permitting included pre/post computer modeling and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. • Plantation Midtown Improvements and Greenway Transit Route Phase 1, Plantation, Florida - Principal in Charge for streetscape design that will include the reconstruction of 2.5 miles of mixed use walkways, textured crosswalks, parallel parking, landscaped medians, and a roundabout at a key intersection of the City. As the first phase of a large project, the firm's design will be the template for all improvements to follow in the City's midtown area. As part of the City's master plan, a greenway transit route for the entire midtown area is included. We have worked with the City in designing the route that the first phase of the bus transit will operate as well as helped them research the different type of transit vehicles available to them. In working hand in hand with the City on this issue, we are ensuring that the design we deliver meets the needs and expectations for the entire scope of their greenway project. • Old Cutler Road (SW 97-87Ave), Cutler Bay, FL- Principal in Charge responsible for the design improvements for the portion of Old Cutler Road between SW 97th Avenue and SW 87th Avenue. The project consists of roadway improvements, traffic circles, pavement resurfacing, sidewalks, drainage facilities, medians, landscaping and lighting. Old Cutler Road is designated a historic roadway which required all improvements to respect the existing roadway footprint, thus limiting the modification and/or additional widening of the road. This Miami -Dade County roadway is considered an arterial collector roadway. The proposed configuration for Old Cutler Road will include roundabouts at each end of the corridor for traffic calming and beautification. The 1.24 mile corridor between these two roundabouts will be a two lane roadway with turn lanes, landscape medians and scramble lanes. Permitting including Miami -Dade County Public Works DERM and Town of Cutler Bay. • Highland Village Neighborhood Improvements, North Miami Beach, FL - Civil Engineer for this $6 million dollar neighborhood improvement project in a low lying area of the City of North Miami Beach with extensive flooding and water quality problems resulting from failed on-site septic systems. The project included design of a pumped deep well disposal system, design of a wastewater collection and transmission system, including a new pump station and force main, design of roadway and site improvements, preparation of construction plans, permitting and preparation of grant applications seeking financial assistance to complete the project. • Indian Creek Village Improvements, Indian Creek, Florida - Principal in Charge for this project in which the firm and Rosenberg Gardner Design (RDG) developed a Master Plan for the Village of Indian Creek. The plan identified critical concerns and built consensus among the Council Members and residents of the Village with respect to project scope and key design elements of proposed improvements and enhancements. These improvements include reconfiguration of the Village the entrance by tightening the corner radii, expanding the landscaped corners on either side, creating an oval landscaped island, and historically restoring of the existing Gate House. • Pinecrest Water Main Plan and System Design, 8 -inch, 12 -inch and 16 -inch Water Main Extensions, Pinecrest, FL - Project Manager for the planning and final design of over 27 miles of water main improvements to complete the potable water system of the Village of Pinecrest - within a three square mile residential area. The homes in the project area were on wells, and lacking a public water supply system and fire protection. The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system. Public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the work and cost involved in the project. The ductile iron water mains installed ranged in size from 8" diameter to 16" diameter. The first two phases of these improvements have been permitted and constructed. The first phase included approximately 35,000 linear feet of 12" diameter and 16" diameter backbone water main for the area, along the section line and half -section line roadways. The second phase of the improvements included approximately 12,000 linear feet of 8" water main in single family residential neighborhoods. All project areas were fully restored and the roadways were completely resurfaced. The project was jointly funded by the Village of Pinecrest and Miami Dade County, and the systems were donated to MDWASD upon completion, certification and acceptance. • MDWASD 54 -inch Water Main, NW 57th Avenue, Hialeah, FL - Engineer of Record for this project. New 54" Ductile Iron water main on NW 57th Avenue from NW 138th Street to NW 142nd Street. Project incorporated an interconnect with the existing 48" PCCP water main which runs parallel to new line, and is being kept as a back-up facility. The interconnect included temporary line stops and a bypass at the existing 48" PCCP main, butterfly valves and access manholes. NW 57th Avenue is a major6 lane divided FDOT urban arterial, which required extensive maintenance of traffic planning for the new main installation. This project was executed under a Joint Project Agreement with FDOT District 6. Stantec Resumes Jeffrey Crews, PE, LEED AP QA/QC Off cer Jeff, with over 29 years of experience, has been Design Engineer and Project Manager on various projects in the field of structural and civil engineering. Jeff's civil experience has included the preparation of utility relocation plans, drainage analysis, development of traffic control, and storrnwater pollution prevention plans. Jeff also has extensive design, construction inspection, and administration experience in all types of building structures. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Cum Laude, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 1988 Registration Professional Engineer #46575, State of Florida LEED Accredited Professional, U.S. Green Building Council Stantec Select project experience • Miami Beach Design Criteria for Palm Island and Hibiscus Island, Miami Beach, Florida -Design Criteria Professional and Project Manager for the preparation of design -build criteria packages including design development plans. This project was a full reconstruction project of Palm Island, and Hibiscus Island, which are exclusive and historic high-end residential neighborhoods in Biscayne Bay. Scope of work includes drainage, roadway, water, landscaping, lighting, and undergrounding of utilities (FPL, ATT and Comcast). Project also includes cost estimating, maintenance of traffic, scheduling, storm water pollution prevention, permitting, and construction management. Services included development of a master prototype Design Criteria Package with a new approach to the design build delivery system. • Flamingo Park Football Stadium, Miami Beach, Florida - Lead Civil Engineer and Sports field Specialist for the redevelopment of an existing football stadium. The project involved the construction of a new artificial turf field and new 8 lane track with rubberized running surface. Services include extensive drainage design in this extremely low lying area in Miami Beach. • Royal Caribbean Production Studio, North Miami, Florida - Project Manager/Lead Civil Engineer for the development of this public -private -partnership between Florida International University and Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines. The project, constructed on the FIU Biscayne Campus, included a 130,000 sf studio building for the development and rehearsal of shipboard entertainment. The project included the extensive relocation of existing utilities including water mains, irrigation mains, force mains and a 36" drainage trunk line. Due to thick layers of unsuitable soils, the project included geo-fabric reinforced pavements and other special construction considerations. • Pompano Beach Drainage Basin 4-1 and 4-2, Pompano Beach, Florida - Project Manager for neighborhood drainage improvements in a low-lying residential neighborhood in the coastal region resulting in high ground water table. Project included the development of significant amounts of French drain along with minor utility modifications and an asphalt overlay. Services also include permitting and continued through procurement and construction. • Pompano Beach Utility Services Compound, Pompano Beach, FL - Project Manager for the Master Planning and Design Criteria Professional Services for the redevelopment of a City Municipal Maintenance Compound to reorganize the compound site and the building spaces to better utilize the space available. The City's Utility Department occupied a 2.8 acre site with multiple outdated buildings which were places haphazardly around the site. The lack of continuity of the layout hampered operating efficiencies and the buildings were in need of replacement. The new master plan was adopted by the City and a Design Criteria Package was developed for competitive bidding to a Design -Build Contractor. • Florida Atlantic Sea Tech Campus Drainage Improvements, Dania Beach, FL -Project Manager for the full re -design of the parking lots at the Sea Tech branch campus located at the Dania Beach Pier area. The parking area had been subdivided improperly with a building expansion that prevented storm water from draining in the manner in which the parking lots had originally been intended. The project involved a drainage study to determine the cause and effect of the standing water at the site. In depth analysis showed that the existing system was inadequate to handle the Resumes design volume of storm water. Subsequent to the study, the system was re -designed to accommodate the required volumes and permitted for the new construction to incorporate a new drainage collection system and vertical storm water wells. Project required phasing to accommodate access to parking for students. A detailed cost estimate was prepared during the study for the university so that they could obtain funding prior to final design and bidding the project for construction. • Basin "A" and Basin "B" Stormwater Pump Stations, Lauderhill, FL - Senior Civil Engineer for Basin A: 3 -pump stormwater pump station which required two 40,000 gpm line shaft axial flow pumps with 145 hp natural gas caterpillar engines. A third pump is provided for back ups. Pumps operate in a automatic mode and start when storm stage levels rise. The facility includes a reinforced masonry structure that houses the engines, controls generator and communications equipment; and Basin B: 2 -pump stormwater pump station which required a 44,000 gpm line shaft axial -flow pump with a 145 hp natural gas caterpillar engine. Second pump is used as back-up. Station operates under an automatic mode. A reinforced masonry structure houses the engines, controls, generator, and RTU, etc. • Turnpike Crossings, Lauderhill, Florida - Project Engineer for this project which included four horizontal directional drillings (HDD) beneath the Florida Turnpike. HDPE (high density polyethylene) was used for a casing pipe and carrier pipe for both water mains and force mains. These large diameter pipe lines are extremely important to the City of Lauderhill. Florida Turnpike Enterprise was rebuilding the Turnpike and the City's old transmission mains needed to be abandoned and replaced. The firm decided to design new force mains and water mains under the Turnpike with the new HDPE pipe installed via HDD (horizontal directional drill). Work was done using FDOT approved methods and materials. Facilities were installed in rapid succession and tied into DI pipe at its ends. • FDOT North Dade Maintenance Facility (Phases I, II, III), North Miami, Florida - Chief Engineer for the Master Plan and Contract Documents for this Design/Build Project. Phase I consists of a 12,000 s.f. office building which included offices; conference and training rooms; lunch room with a kitchenette and vending machines; locker facilities with showers and toilets; and computer / radio communication rooms. An emergency generator was also provided. Phase II included an 18,000 s.f. eight -bay vehicle maintenance / warehouse building; roofing of a four -station fueling facility; bulk and secure material storage; and site development of the 8.3 acre parcel. For Phase III, the firm provided contract documents for the design/build project of a 5,000 s.f office which consists of offices and conference room for the FDOT Construction Department. A 600 s!. welding shop and restroom facility was also provided under this phase. • Coral Hills Drive Roadway Improvements, Coral Springs, Florida Project Manager and Lead Civil Engineer responsible for a series of improvements to a mile long segment of historic roadway in Coral Springs. Improvements included new pathways and traffic calming as well as drainage improvements and new canal outfalls. • NE 33rd Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida - Project Manager for master planning of a neighborhood improvement program that included traffic calming and aesthetic features for an upscale neighborhood in Fort Lauderdale's Beach area. Features included traffic circles, crosswalks, median islands, paver inlays, sidewalks and bike paths. • Coral Springs Public Safety Training & Technology Center, Coral Springs, Florida - Senior Project Engineer for the feasibility study and ultimate development for the City's fire academy located on a 3.9 -acre site. The study brought about the design phase, which included the design of the 30,000 square feet training facility which includes two large apparatus training bays and one maintenance training bay, four training rooms seating 40 people and four rooms seating 30 people, instructor's officers, library, computer lab, medical technical training facilities, locker/dressing rooms, restrooms, and other spaces. In addition, there was a multi -story tower, burn pits, vehicle fire facilities, and roadways with multiple fire hydrant connections amidst multiple training stations. • Reclaimed Water Pipeline Canal Crossing, Margate, Florida - Project Manager and Engineer of Record for this Design Build project for which the firm was the Engineer of Record for the construction of 2000 LF of 16" reclaimed water main. The project included a 600' segment of 18" HDPE Horizontal Direction Drilling (HDD) to cross a city canal and residential lot. The HDD required a complicated reverse curve alignment to remain within a designated easement and road right-of-way that were horizontally offset. The HDD also required unusual depth to ensure proper clearance under the canal. The project also included 1200' of direct bury installation to complete the entire alignment. The firm was responsible for all design and permitting aspects of the installation as well as field inspection during construction. Stantec Resumes Carlos Hercoc,ia, 2 , LEED A Senior Roadway Engineer Carlos has 28 years of experience and has been Project Manager and Senior Design Engineer on various roadway and drainage projects for municipalities in Miami -Dade County. He has extensive experience in developing residential, commercial and highway roadway and drainage plans. This experience includes traffic calming, resurfacing and reconstruction plans, drainage design studies and reports, maintenance of traffic, signalization, lighting and signing and marking plans. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida,1988 Registration Professional Engineer #47660, State of Florida LEED Accredited Professional, U.S. Green Building Council Stantec Select project experience • John F. Kennedy Causeway Redevelopment North Bay Village, Florida - Senior Engineer for this project that involves the design and construction services for the redevelopment of the John F. Kennedy Causeway. The project will be' implemented in several phases. Phase I will be the landscape design and construction of street beautification improvements to the western end of the Causeway. While this phase is being implemented, a conceptual master plan shall be prepared to address the complete beautification and redevelopment program for Kennedy Causeway which includes the roadway, adjacent business district, and the waterfront. • SW 264 Street Improvements (US -1 to SW 137 Avenue), Miami -Dade County, Florida - Project Manager and Senior Project Engineer (Engineer of Record) involved with the design for the proposed street improvements for SW 264 Street (approx. 0.74 miles). Design elements included a new configuration for SW 264 Street with a 2 -lane divided roadway within an 80 ft right of way. The proposed corridor design consisted of standard travel lanes, bicycle lanes, parking stalls with landscape bump -outs after every second parking stall, a landscaped median, traffic separator, standard curb and gutter, sidewalk, school bus drop-off, pavement marking and signage, roadway lighting and report, school zone with applicable markings, signs and flashers, and modification of existing traffic signal at US -1. Design elements of stormwater management included over 3,150 feet of exfiltration trench, 2,000 feet of solid pipe, 45 drainage structures, pollution control structure with an emergency overflow into Naranja Canal with a rip -rap end -wall and manatee grate. Services also included preliminary field investigations, utility coordination, computation book, drainage report, detailed cost estimates and permitting through DERM. • Town of Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program, Golden Beach, Florida - Senior Civil Engineer for this comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan that focuses on several major improvement areas: town -wide drainage improvements; utilities underground relocation (electrical, telephone, cable); town -wide streetscape & traffic calming; and renovation to the Town's existing Town Hall building. The Master Plan carefully considered the each of these with respect to feasibility, cost/benefit, and design, as well as an analysis of funding options and scenarios, and schedule for phasing and implementation. • South Miami Downtown Improvements Phase IV, South Miami, Florida - Senior Civil Engineer involved with street and drainage improvements including over 200 feet of exfiltration trench, 200 feet of solid pipe, ten drainage structures, milling and resurfacing of roadway, sidewalk, curb and gutter stripping & signing landscaping and irrigation and maintenance of traffic (MOT) plans. Also responsible for the productionof demolition, geometry paving grading and drainage, typical sections and detail, landscaping and irrigation plans. Duties also included drainage report and detailed cost estimates. • Crandon Boulevard Master Plan, Key Biscayne, Florida - Project Engineer for this project that took an existing suburban style highway and transformed it into a center of community activities. By promoting the safe and secure transit of all types of vehicles and pedestrians, this OPTED friendly design also serves to create a source of identity for the community connecting retail, residential, public parks and government facilities into a cohesive design. The project consisted of a master plan that encompassed the design for a 4 -lane divided road, improved public safety, easing of traffic congestion, traffic calming, pedestrianization, improved mass transit, streetscape improvements, sidewalks, lighting, and a roundabout. Resumes • SW 6 Street Improvements, Sweetwater, Florida - Project Engineer on the design of approximately 0.5 miles of urban road resurfacing, sidewalk rehabilitation, drainage improvements, pavement marking and signage, and landscaping plans. Responsibilities included Construction Administration and Inspections. • Hialeah Street Improvements, Hialeah, Florida - Project Manager and Engineer of Record for engineering design and preparation of construction drawings and specifications for numerous roadway reconstruction projects in City of Hialeah varying from 0.5 to 1.5 miles, and two- to five -lane sections. The improvements included geometry, earthwork, pavement sidewalk, curb and gutter, raised median, drainage, lighting, pavement marking and signage. Some of the projects include: West 44 Place from West 10 to West 12 Ave.; East 8 Court from East 45 to East 49 St.; West 26 Street from West 52 to West 60 Ave.; East 8 Lane from East 45 to East 49 St.; West 33 Street from Palm Ave. to East 4 Ave.; East 9 Court from East 45 to East 49 St.; West 37 Street from West 16 to West 8 Ave.; East 9 Lane from East 45 to East 49 St.; West 46 Street from West 16 to West 12 Ave.; East 47 Street from East 8 to East 10 Ave.; West 56 Street from West 26 to West 20 Ave.; East 2 Avenue from East 33 St. to West 41 St.; West 18 Avenue from Okeechobee Rd. to West 49 Ave.; East 22 St. to East 24 St. & East 9 Ave. • West Kendall District Park (SW 157th Avenue and SW 120th Street), Miami -Dade County, Florida - Project Manager and Senior Project Engineer (Engineer of Record) involved with proposed new roadway design and street improvements for Miami -Dade County. Design elements included over 4,600 feet of exfiltration trench, 1,000 feet of solid pipe, 31 drainage structures, over 5,000 feet of 16" water main with sub -aqueous crossing, roadway resurfacing, roadway lighting and report, new signalization with mast arm configuration of existing intersection, over 1 mile of new roadway with sub base, base and asphalt, sidewalk, guardrail, landscaped median, retaining wall, curb and gutter, pavement markings and signs and coordination with structural department for design of proposed Bridge over a canal. Services include the production of Grading and Drainage, Typical Sections, detail plans, preliminary field investigations, utility coordination, computation book, drainage report and detailed cost estimates. Other tasks included permitting through DERM, Miami -Dade Water and Sewer, Miami -Dade Fire Rescue, Florida Department of Health and acquisition of Right of Way permit through SFWMD. • NW 72 Avenue from Okeechobee Road to N.W. 122nd Avenue, Miami, Florida - Project Manager and Engineer of Record responsible for design of 2.5 miles of roadway. Project includes widening from two lane to four lane divided as well as installing new drainage on existing four -lane section of the corridor. Also included are the reconstruction of sidewalks, curb and gutters, upgrading 11 signalized intersections to mast arm configuration, and the installation of lighting. • Residential Street Closure and Traffic Study, Bay Harbor Islands, Florida - Traffic study for the implementation of several street closure, landscaping and guardhouse facilities to included Neighborhood Public Involvement Work Shops. This was done in support of a Special Taxing District to add security provisions for both sides of the Island. • N.E. 19th Avenue Roadway Improvements (N.E. 171st Street to N.E. 183rd Street), North Miami Beach, Florida - Project Manager and Senior Roadway Engineer (Engineer of Record) for the reconstruction of all non -signalized intersections to provide roadway widening and resurfacing project including pavement widening, overlay, curb and gutter, curbed islands, landscaping, drainage, on -street parking, lighting, pavement marking and signage, drainage fumes at the corner radii, and median nosing. The project also inluded a new roundabout at each of the non -signalize median openings. • CDBG Street and Drainage Improvements, Sweetwater, Florida - Project Engineer for the on-going multi -phase, multi-year project consists of the widening, resurfacing, landscaping and provision of drainage for deteriorated local city roads. Over five miles of roadway have been improved, representing approximately 25% of all roads within the municipality. • Traffic Calming Devices and Right of Way Improvements (Phases I and II), Doral, Florida - Project Manager for the design and construction of traffic calming devices and right of way improvements within the City limits. We were the prime design firm for this design/build project that includes the design and permitting of one traffic circle at the intersection of NW 109th Avenue and NW 86th Street and two splitter islands on SW 78th Street. The project also includes new curb and gutters, pavement milling and resurfacing, pavered crosswalks (at traffic circle only), and landscaped medians. • Miscellaneous Traffic Studies & Traffic Counts - Preparation of miscellaneous traffic studies and counts for various projects which included: Bicycle Facilities Network Plan, Metropolitan Dade County (MPO); SR -826 (Palmetto Expressway) PD&E Traffic Counts, FDOT District 6; Sunrise Boulevard Traffic Counts and Turning Movement Counts at 20 Intersections, FDOT District 4; 150 Alhambra Building Parking Garage, Investigation to improve functional use and traffic flows; Monterrey Development Traffic Generation Study and Access Location Study. Slantec Resumes Marlon Medina, PE, -M Sf :arm a ter Engineer Marlon has over 8 years of experience in the design of Civil Engineering systems including drainage, paving and utilities for large scale projects. He has served as project engineer for various drainage, water, sewer, underground electrical, and industrial projects. His experience has allowed him to effectively deliver projects satisfying all owner requirements. He is proficient at various software packages including Microsoft Project, MBR (SFWMD Multi -Basin Routing Software), Flowmaster, AutoCAD, AutoTurn and EaglePoint. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 2008 Registration Professional Engineer #77052, State of Florida Certified Floodplain Manager #US -12- 06741, State of Florida Stantec Select project experience • Miami Beach Stormwater Pump Station, Seawall and Outfall Permitting, Miami Beach, Florida - Marlon is providing civil engineering design services for this project. With the growing challenges to stormwater management based upon the very real threat of sea level rise, the City of Miami Beach has modified their stormwater master plan converting from a gravity -based system to a system utilizing pump stations and outfalls. Stantec was selected by the City to provide environmental and engineering services related to obtaining a wide range of federal, state, and local permits. The required authorizations have included: Environmental Resource Permits (ERP) through the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD); Dredge & Fill Permits through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE); Class I, Class II and Class V Permits from the Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM); Consumptive use permits (CUP) through the SFWMD; and Class V stormwater well permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). These projects have included construction of seawalls and pump stations and installation of stormwater outfall structures and riprap. Stantec has met the challenge of obtaining these permits in a very short period in order to meet the demanding schedule established by the City to avoid flooding in the streets during high and king tides. Our staff was able to work with all of the listed agencies to negotiate through the permitting processes to meet construction schedules. In addition, Stantec was able to coordinate with commenting agencies to avoid lengthy federal consultation processes for endangered species (specifically the small tooth sawfish and Johnson's seagrass both regulated by the National Marine Fisheries Service). • No Name Harbor Seawall Repairs, Key Biscayne, Florida - Civil -Structural Engineer for Seawall Repairs. No Name Harbor is a small anchorage located on the bay side of Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, in Key Biscayne, Florida. Beginning at the south side of the harbor's narrow opening, a 1,475 LF seawall bulkhead exists along the south and west harbor shoreline. The existing seawall was constructed using a system of tied -back concrete piles with concrete panels. In 2012, Stantec provided a report outlining the poor condition of the seawall and offered three repair options along with a replacement option. Stantec then prepared design documents which detailed repairing cracks and spalls in the cap, piles, and deadmen, replacing deadmen as needed, replacing all tie- backs, providing rip -rap to return the mudline to its original elevation, repairing and sealing all panel joints, and miscellaneous restoration work, including the sidewalk along the seawall cap. • Village of Palmetto Bay Drainage Improvements, Palmetto Bay, Florida - Civil Engineer involved with street and drainage improvements. Design elements included field review of existing conditions, limited engineering survey of roadway centerline elevations and low points as needed to establish flow patterns and collection points, perform engineering analysis and design of new drainage systems or system improvements/modifications, and preparation of construction sketches sufficient for construction. Duties also included drainage report and detailed cost estimates. • City of Coral Gables City-wide Assessment of all City Owned Roadways, Coral Gables, Florida - Civil Engineer assisted in this City wide assessment of approximately 240 miles of pavement condition in the public rights -of way within the City limits. A condition rating was assigned to each roadway section and the recommended streets to be improved were integrated into a Resumes City aerial map using GIS. This map was reviewed analyzed with City staff and eventually served as the City's Pavement Capital Improvement Plan. Using this Capital Improvement Plan, construction documents which included 11x17 plans, specifications, project manual and cost estimates were developed in two phases for resurfacing and rehabilitation. • Old Cutler Road (SW 97 Avenue - 87 Avenue), Cutler Bay, Florida - Civil Engineer assisting in the design improvements for the portion of Old Cutler Road between SW 97th Avenue and SW 87th Avenue. The project consists of roadway improvements, traffic circles, pavement resurfacing, sidewalks, drainage facilities, medians, landscaping and lighting. Old Cutler Road is designated a historic roadway which required all improvements to respect the existing roadway footprint, thus limiting the modification and/or additional widening of the road. This Miami -Dade County roadway is considered an arterial collector roadway. The 1.24 mile corridor between these two roundabouts now is a two lane roadway with turn lanes. • Caribbean Boulevard (Coral Sea Road to SW 87 Avenue), Cutler Bay, Florida - Civil Engineer for the design improvements for the portion of Caribbean Blvd. between Coral Sea Road and SW 87th Avenue. The project consists of roadway improvements, two (2) traffic circles, pavement reconstruction, curbwork, sidewalks, drainage facilities, medians, turn lanes, landscaping and roadway lighting. This portion of Caribbean Blvd. is primarily a residential road. This Miami -Dade County roadway is considered a collector roadway. The proposed configuration for Caribbean Blvd. will include roundabouts at Gulf Stream Rd. and SW 192 Dr. for traffic calming and beautification. The corridor will be a two lane roadway with turn lanes, landscape medians and traffic calming splitter islands where plausible. • Florida International University (FIU) Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study, Miami, Florida - Civil Engineer for the evaluation of Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) within FIU's sewer system. The SSES was performed on over 40,000 feet of gravity lines, 9 pump stations, and 150 manholes, all in compliance with the Miami -Dade Volume Sewer Customer Ordinance (VSCO) and Plan A and Plan B of the Miami -Dade Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) guidelines for "Second Cycle SSES Submittals". We implemented a time sensitive schedule which included inspections and repairs needed to make the sewer system compliant before submitting an extensive SSES report to FIU. • Traffic Calming Devices and Right of Way, Doral, Florida - Civil Engineer for the design and construction of traffic calming devices and right of way improvements within the City limits. The firm is the prime design firm for this design/build project that includes the design and permitting of one traffic circle at the intersection of NW 109th Avenue and NW 86th Street and two splitter islands on SW 78th Street. The project also includes new curb and gutters, pavement milling and resurfacing, pavered crosswalks (at traffic circle only), and landscaped medians. • NW 2nd Avenue Wastewater Meter, North Miami Beach, Florida - Civil Engineer for this project which included the design of a Wastewater Meter on an existing force main, Permits from WASD, DERM & SFWMD, and assistance in the Construction Phase. The proposed Meter was sized based on tributary flows (current and future), and Permitted in accordance with County and State regulations. • Pinecrest Watermain Master Plan and System Design, Pinecrest, Florida - Civil Engineer for the design of over 27 miles of watermain to complete the potable water system of the entire Village. The Master Plan was prepared that included a computerized model of the entire system and public workshops and meetings were held to inform and educate the residents of the extensive work and cost involved in the project. The firm also prepared special taxing districts to better explain the finances of the project. • Town of Medley Sewer System Repairs & Rehabilitation, Medley, Florida - Civil Engineer for the evaluation of Medley's Sewer system. Tasks included assisting project manager with Pump station readings, data collection, Shop Drawings review and analyses of the comprised study. The study area consists of 14 Pump Stations covering 8 square miles. • Sub -aqueous Canal Crossing at SW 152 Avenue, Homestead, Florida - Civil Engineer for this project which included the construction of electrical ducts crossing under Canal C-103 east of the SW 152nd Avenue bridge. Duties included the design of the horizontal directional drilling (HDD), preparation of design documents, cost estirnates, Permit from SFWMD, preparation of Bid Documents, and shop drawing reviews. The installed duct banks provided for future installation of electrical wiring. Stantac Resumes } Terran e Glunt, PE, SI, LEED AFS Engineer Cost Estinclting / Value wngineerinci Tery has over 39 years of experience in the management and administration of engineering divisions responsible for all aspects of design and construction of government and agency related facilities including marina and boating access facilities, recreation complexes, urban and Interstate roadways and bridges, utility corridors, municipal public works and administration facilities, nuclear power plants, landfills and aviation facilities throughout Florida and the United States. His specific experience includes engineering design and coordination of multiple projects, construction engineering and inspection, quality control/constructability review, rigid and flexible pavement design and analysis, hydrologic evaluations, geotechnical and environmental studies, DRI and PD&E involvement, environmental and drainage permitting, preparation of grant applications and coordination of numerous miscellaneous civil and structural contracts with State, County and Municipal entities. Tery has been responsible for the start-up of numerous offices for his current firm, as well as for his previous employers; involving research and development, establishment of budgets and procurement of all facilities, equipment, vehicles and staff. Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida International University, Miami Beach, Florida, 1985 Bachelor of Science in Environmental Sciences, Juniata College, Huntington, Pennsylvania, 1976 Registrations Professional Engineer #40130, State of Florida Certification, Threshold (Special) Inspector, No. 0950, 2012 Certification, ACI, Level 1 Field Technician, 2012 OSHA, 40 -Hour Hazardous materials Technician, HAZMAT, 2012 Stantec Select project experience • Plantation Midtown Improvements and Greenway Transit Route Phase I, Plantation, FL - Project Manager for the master plan, engineering design, and construction administration of the revitalization of entire central business district and creation of mixed-use area conducive to pedestrian friendly use and access. The project included the reconstruction of 2.5 miles of mixed use walkways, textured crosswalks, parallel parking, landscaped medians, and a roundabout at a key intersection of the City. The firm's design is the template for all improvements to follow in the City's midtown area. We have worked with the City in designing the route that the first phase of the bus transit will operate as well as helped them research the different type of transit vehicles available to them. In working hand in hand with the City on this issue, we are ensuring that the design we deliver meets the needs and expectations for the entire scope of their greenway project. • Via Vizcaya Neighborhood Improvements, Palm Beach, FL - Principal in Charge for this project which included the design of an upgraded storm water system for a two -block area at the south end of the Town of Palm Beach. The system needed to be designed from a fixed outfall elevation and run backwards to accommodate drainage in the roadways of a million dollar plus per residence neighborhood. Once the project was underway, it was determined that the existing water and sewer needed to be upgraded as well. Full roadway reconstruction was also added since most of the streets were excavated to install the drainage and utilities. Project required phasing to accommodate access to resident driveways. • Belvedere Road and Pike Road Intersection Improvements, Palm Beach County, Florida - Principal in Charge for the design and permitting of a designated right turn lane and paved shoulder widening on Pike Road at the approach to Belvedere Road. Included in the design was the extension of a large diameter culvert in the LWDD L-3 canal beneath Pike Road, guardrail, curb and gutter, milling and resurfacing of the mainline on Pike Road, driveway connections to adjacent properties, right of way designation for easement acquisition, utility adjustments, pavement markings and accommodations for signalization. Permitting included drainage permits through LWDD and SFWMD. Legal description for all easements and right of way acquisition was obtained and provided for legal purposes. • Waterway Park, Jupiter, Florida - Project Manager for development of new boat ramp facility in northern Palm Beach County. Duties included site plan development, design, permitting and construction administration for this 30 acre natural park along Indiantown Road and the ICWW. Permitting issues included development of a gopher tortoise reserve, mangrove and seagrass mitigation, compliance with county manatee protection program, stormwater runoff and an FDOT permit for the entrance off of Indiantown Road. The project included 4 boat ramps, concrete floating dock finger piers and staging docks, concrete seawall protection, education kiosks, picnic pavilions, restroom facilities, parking for 50 boat trailers and on site roadway and parking systems. Resumes • Riviera Beach Roadway Sidewalk Pavement Assessment Riviera Beach, Florida - Principal in Charge for the assessment of the condition of approximately 85 centerline miles of existing roadway pavement network and development of a Multiyear Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan for the City. The project also includes assessment of sidewalk and asset inventory of catch basins and manholes. Automated field data of pavement distresses were collected and loaded into MicroPaver to determine Pavement Condition Index (PCI). Development of deterioration models, and ranking and prioritization of repair and rehabilitation needs, engineering Analysis of repair and rehabilitation options for the various roadways, development unit cost information and development routine maintenance requirements was developed by Stantec. This information was used to develop a multi-year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Work Plan and carried out budget analysis based on the Minimum PCI and Critical PCI methods for the City of Riviera Beach. This multi-year plan served as the City's CIP. • Basins "A" and `B" Stormwater Pump Stations, Lauderhill, FL - Senior Engineer for these projects which both required two 40,000 gpm line shaft axial flow pumps with 145 hp natural gas caterpillar engines with a third pump for back-up. Pumps operate in an automatic mode and start when storm stage levels rise. The facility includes a reinforced masonry structure that houses the engines, controls generator and communications equipment. • Basin D-8 Drainage Basin Improvements, Palm Beach, FL - Principal in Charge for this project to evaluate the existing D-8 drainage basin in the Town of Palm Beach comprising 250+ acres of residential neighborhood and roadways. Specific tasks included evaluation of existing basin utilizing ICPR modeling techniques, and full design plans for basin -wide drainage improvements. Additional duties included surveying, underground soft -dig utility locates, utility relocation, geotechnical investigation, and permitting through the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). • Ferndale 20" Watermain / 24" Force Main, Delray Beach, FL - Principal in Charge for this project that included the design and permitting of a new 20 -inch diameter ductile iron water main approximately 4,000 feet long, along with 200 LF of 24" Force Main. Project included two aerial canal crossings of the Lake Worth Drainage District canals and direct burial piping along Lake Ida Road. Coordination with three other projects was needed for tie-ins at those locations. Additionally, the project included detailed investigations of utilities and possible conflicts along route of the main. The project construction cost was $800,000.00. The firm also performed construction administration during construction phase and provided final certification to FDEP and PBCHD. • Sanford Avenue Drainage & Utility Improvements, Palm Beach, FL - Principal in Charge for this project which included the full re -design of a two -block section of Sanford Avenue in the Town of Palm Beach. The design included replacement of the roadway, curbing, drainage system, water, sewer and street lighting components of the project. Town of Patin Beach required special low profile curb elements and new design had to conform to existing driveway profiles while still improving drainage characteristics. Design of the sanitary and water systems had to tie in to existing facilities at each end of the project, while upgrading piping and MAS structures. Project also included conduit for cable television, BellSouth and FP&L to eliminate overhead service lines. Project required phasing to accommodate access to resident driveways. • Palm Beach Seawall Repairs, Palm Beach, FL - Senior Engineer for the rehabilitation of 2.5 miles of seawall along the Atlantic Ocean. The design included the evaluation of existing failed sections, The development of repairs included various repair types. These included deadmen and tie -back, placement of rubble rip -rap to prevent kick out and toe failure, as well as full replacement utilizing soldier T -piles and precast panels. • Pompano Community Park Aquatic Facilities, Pompano Beach, FL - Principal in Charge for the design and permitting of a new aquatic facility, which includes the master planning, design and construction management of a new competition pool, restrooms, concession and pool buildings. New parking, utilities, landscape and irrigation systems were also required. In addition, the existing pool was rehabilitated and brought up to code to create a double pool complex. • Alsdorf Park Boat Ramps, Pompano, Florida - Principal in Charge of design, permitting and construction administration for the rehabilitation of a three slip boat ramp facility. The project included reconstruction of ramps and approaches, boat trailer parking lot resurfacing for 90 space parking lot, pedestrian walkways, landscaping and irrigation upgrades, drainage improvements, boat wash down area, lighting upgrades and signage for heavily used boat ramp complex on FIND leased property to City of Pompano Beach. Project required phased construction to maintain boat and trailer access to ramps during reconstruction. Stantec Resumes anagiotis "Pete" McRae, Senior Jroj ect Engineer Pete has more than 22 years of engineering experience which includes working in the field as an Inspector, Senior Inspector, Senior Bridge Inspector, Project Engineer, Project Administrator, and presently a Senior Project Engineer. His experience includes milling and resurfacing, roadway reconstruction and widening, major earthwork, construction bridge rehabilitation, bridge replacement, as well as coatings inspection. He has also been responsible for various engineering tasks that include signing and sealing final as -built plans, technical report writing, claims analysis, man-hour estimates, correspondence with key stakeholders, and ensuring that projects are constructed in reasonable conformance with plans and specifications. Education Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 1998 Associate in Science, Palm Beach Community College, Lake Worth, Florida, 1995 Certifications Professional Engineer #61767, State of Florida CTQP QC Manager CTQP Final Estimates - Levels I & II, 2015-2016 CTQP Asphalt Paving Technician - Levels I & II CTAP Earthwork Const. Inspection, Levels I & II, 2018 CTQP - Pile Driving Inspection Certified NPDES Stormwater Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector, Florida, 2004, (#6503) OSHA Certification - Safety Training Course, 10 -hr, 2003 SSPC C-3 Certification SSPC BCI Certification FDOT Advanced Maintenance of Traffic, 2017 FDOT Critical Structures Const. Course, 2012 FDOT Construction Academy, 2006 Troxler Radiation Safety Officer, 2003 Stantec Select project experience • Palm Beach Operations General CEI Consultant Construction Support, FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, Florida - Pete served as the Warranty Coordinator for this contract. His responsibilities included scheduling quarterly landscape reviews during the one year establishment period, meeting with the maintaining agencies for the landscaping and irrigation, as well as ensuring that any landscape needs are addressed. Additionally, he reviewed all of FDOT projects over the three-year value-added asphalt warranty period to determine if there are any types of issues, problems or failures. • SR 802 (Lake Worth Road) Bridge numbers 930104 & 930318 over the Lake Worth Lagoon (ICWW) (Conducted under the PB Operations General CEI Consultant Contract), FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, Florida - The project scope included the full removal and replacement of the bascule and flanking span steel structure coating system, spall repair, cathodic protection upgrades to pier columns and the maintenance and operation of the bridge. As a Project Engineer, Mr. McRae is responsible for the day -to day onsite construction project management, work zone traffic control, contractor coordination, project documentation, resolves daily issues, utility conflicts and design flaws; oversees daily inspections. Mr. McRae also enforces the CPPR System, completes status reports and prepares monthly progress reports and invoice projections. • SR 708 (Blue Heron Boulevard) Resurfacing from Avenue S to Old Dixie Highway, FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, FL - This project included milling and resurfacing approximately one mile of urban roadway, ADA improvements, mast arms, minor drainage improvements, landscaping, signalization and signing and pavement markings. Pete served as the Project Engineer for this project and was responsible for the overall management and administration of the project and personnel. Pete oversaw daily inspection, conducted weekly construction progress meetings and corresponded with contractors and sub -consultants, monitored work orders, supplemental agreements and progress estimates. • SR 882 (Glades Road) from SR 7 (US 441) to east of Lyons Road (Conducted under the Districtwide PB Operations General. CEI Consultant Contract), FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, Florida Pete was bought close out the project due to the FDOT Project Administrator taking another position in Broward Operation Center. He was instrumental in bringing the project in on-time and under budget by addressing key issues that had lingered on the project. • Olive Avenue from Belvedere Road to Lakeview Avenue, Florida, FDOT District 4 - Project Engineer responsible for developing pre-existing drainage conditions, signing and marking plans and quantities. • SR 715 Sidewalk from Duncan Padgett Park to South of 14th Terrace (Conducted under the Districtwide PB Operations General CEI Consultant Contract), FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, Florida - The project involves the addition of approximately 4,500 LF of sidewalk, four new bus stops, guardrail, and minor signing and pavement markings, As a Project Engineer, Pete was responsible for the day -to day onsite construction project management, work zone traffic control, Resumes Pete McRae, PE Page 2 contractor coordination, project documentation, resolves daily issues, utility conflicts and design flaws; oversees daily inspections; as well as corresponds with the contractor, subcontractors and FDOT. Pete also enforced the CPPR System, completed status reports and prepared monthly progress reports. • SR 710 (Beeline Highway) Resurfacing from MP 14.648 to a point east of SR 76 & SR 710 (Beeline Highway) Resurfacing from Okeechobee County Line to MP 14.648, FDOT District 4, Martin County, FL - As Project Engineer, Pete was responsible for the overall management and administration of the project and personnel. Pete oversaw daily inspection, conducted weekly construction progress meetings and corresponded with contractors and sub -consultants, monitored work orders, supplemental agreements and progress estimates. • SR 710 (Beeline Highway) from west of Congress Avenue to west of Australian Avenue, FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, Florida - Internal quality assurance reviewer, attended progress meetings and was a technical advisor for the 0.8 mile, $12 Million widening project. The scope involved the widening of a two-lane roadway to four lanes. The scope also included drainage, inspection of pipe lining, retention swales, signalization, utility relocation, signing and pavement markings, curb and gutter, sidewalk, lighting, handrail, fencing, landscaping and irrigation. The project also incorporated two JPA water and sewer installations with a construction cost of $2.5 Million for the City of Riviera Beach • SR 5 (US 1) Federal Highway from North of Parker Bridge to S. of SR 706 (Indiantown Road) / SR A1A (North Ocean Drive) from S. of Burnt Bridge to SR 5 (US 1), FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, Florida - The SR 5 (US 1) project was approximately 7.1 -miles long and the scope of work included milling and resurfacing the existing asphalt, widening to accommodate bicycle lanes, drainage improvements, new signalization upgrades, landscaping, signing, pavement markings, and minor safety upgrades. The SR A1A (North Ocean Drive) project limits encompassed 0.876 miles. The scope of work included milling and resurfacing the existing asphalt, minor widening, minor drainage improvements, signing, pavement markings, adding bicycle lanes and various safety upgrades including modifying guardrail and ADA ramps. As Senior Project Engineer, Pete was responsible for the overall management and administration of the project and personnel. • SR -805 (US -1) (South Dixie Highway) Resurfacing from S. of SR -700 (SR -80) to Belvedere Road, SR -706 (Indiantown Road) Resurfacing from Chasewood Plaza to SR -811 (Dixie Highway) and SR -809 (Military Trail) Resurfacing from Oxford Street to SR -704 (Okeechobee Blvd), FDOT District 4, Palm Beach County, FL - Senior Project Engineer for this contract which involved resurfacing three portions of roadway. The project limits encompassed approximately 1.1 miles of SR 805 (South Dixie Highway) from south of SR 700/80 to Belvedere Road, 2.3 miles of SR 706 (Indiantown Road) from Chasewood Plaza to SR 811 (Dixie Highway) and 1.7 miles of SR 809 (Military Trail) from Oxford Street to SR 704 (Okeechobee Boulevard). The scope of work included milling, resurfacing, curb and gutter, as well as signing and pavement markings. Pipe re -lining was also included on the SR 809 (Military Trail) project. As the Senior Project Engineer, Pete was responsible for schedule control, contractor tendering, client liaison, contract administration, issuing change orders, evaluating and mitigating claims, preparing reports, and quality control/assurance. • Bridge Deck Replacement, St. Lucie County, Florida, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise - Pete served as Roadway Inspector for this project that included the rehabilitation of the existing bridge, bridge deck replacement, milling and resurfacing of the approaches, as well as inspection and repair of bridge piers. Some of his responsibilities included inspection of daily construction activities, materials testing, maintenance of traffic inspections, and daily reports. • SR 834 (Sample Road) from Northwest 5th Terrace to US 1, Deerfield Beach, Florida, FDOT District 4 - The scope ofwork for this project included milling and resurfacing approximately 2.5 miles of urban roadway, ADA improvements, mast arms, minor drainage improvements, landscaping, signalization, and signing and pavement markings. As. Senior Inspector for this project, Pete's responsibilities included documentation of project quantities, data entry of test reports, data entry from the daily reports into SiteManager, and the maintenance of traffic log. Additional responsibilities included inspection of daily construction activities, materials testing, maintenance of traffic inspections, and daily reports. Slantec Dave Clear Senior Project <e, PE, C'M Engineer / Maintenance of Traff c (Resumes Dave has over 14 years of experience on numerous public infrastructure projects for state agencies, counties and municipalities in South Florida. His experience includes the design, permitting and construction inspections for multiple water distribution mains and sanitary sewer force mains. He has extensive permitting experience with many of the regulatory agencies including the Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM), Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Department of Environmental Protection, Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department, Department of Health, and Miami -Dade County Public Works Department. Dave also has experience as a project engineer on pump stations, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, force, Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Studies (SSES) and Sanitary Sewer Repair and Rehabilitation (SSRR) projects. He is proficient with various engineering software tools such as AutoCAD, ArcGIS, MathCAD, Excel, MircoStation, MicroPaver, and HEC -RAS. Education. Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida International University, Miami Beach, Florida, 2002 Master of Science in Civil Engineering, Florida International University, Miami Beach, Florida, 2008 Coordination, Cost Estimate & Billing Certification, FUCC Utility Coordination, Florida, 2010 Construction Certification, FUCC Utility Coordination, Florida, 2011 Advanced Maintenance of Traffic Certification, FDOT, Florida, 2012 Design Certification, FUCC Utility Coordination, Florida, 2012 Registrations Professional Engineer #66553, State of Florida Professional Engineer #040056, State of Georgia Certified Floodplain Manager #US -12- 06737, State of Florida Stantec Select project experience • Miami -Dade County Roadway Improvements, Miami, Florida - Inspector for this project which consisted of supervising all operations necessary for the construction of a new 4 -lane divided roadway along SW 157th Avenue including a new bridge over the C -IW Canal. The work included new sidewalk, curb and gutter, median, a storm water drainage system, signage, pavement markings, signalization, and street lighting. The scope also included new construction of a 2 - lane roadway on SW 120th Street; construction of a new 16" water main along SW 157th Avenue; construction of 16" water main along SW 120th Street; and installation of a 36" sewer force main along SW 157th Avenue, as part of the overall wastewater master plan to complete a connection north of SW 112th Street. • Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT) (SR 821) Eureka Drive (SW 184th Street) to Killian Drive (SW 104th Street) Design Build with BCC Engineering and De -Moya Group - Improvements of HEFT (approx. 5.5 miles) which includes Express Lanes, Bridge Construction, sound walls, drainage, ITS, lighting and utility relocations. Sr. Utility Coordinator responsible for identifying the list of all existing utility agency/owners (UAO) and development of utility conflict matrix. Identify the general locations of all existing facilities including the facility type, size / voltage, pipe material, etc. Work with lighting, signals, tolls, future toll sites and ITS to determine service points. Hold a design build utility information meeting to discuss the project scope with UAO's. Identify how the utility exists (i.e., within the public roadway right-of-way, within easement, on private property, previously subordinated, etc.). Request soft digs at critical locations to determine if utility is in conflict. If relocation is required to accommodate the project, request cost estimates, Utility Work Schedules, Agreements etc. • City of Doral Pavement Evaluation and Five Year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Plan, City Doral, Florida - Engineer of Record responsible for developing Pavement Management System (PMS) for approximately 57 miles of City owned road. Automated field data of pavement distresses were collected and loaded into MicroPaver to determine Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is a subjective method of evaluating distresses in pavement by providing a numerical rating between 0 and 100 where 0 is worst and 100 is best condition. Utilizing MioroPaver, prediction /deterioration models were developed to predict future pavement conditions and identify Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) projects. C3TS completed a final report which included a strategic Five -Year M&R work plan and a budget analysis to address these projects. The recommended projects were integrated into a City map using GIS which was presented to the Council for approval. At the end of the Five Year M&R work plan, the City of Doral would achieve an overall area weighted PCI of 93 for the entire roadway network by the end of the work plan period. • City of Coral Gables Citywide Assessment of all City Owned Roadways, Coral Gables, Florida - Engineer of Record responsible for the City wide assessment of approximately 240 miles of pavement condition in the public rights -of way within the City limits. A condition rating was assigned to each roadway section and the recommended streets to be improved were integrated into a City aerial map using GIS. This map was reviewed analyzed with City staff and eventually served as the City's Pavement Capital Improvement Plan. Using this Capital Improvement Plan, Resumes Dave Clarke, PE, CFM Page 2 construction documents which included 11x17 plans, specifications, project manual and cost estimates were developed in two phases for resurfacing and rehabilitation. • Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike (HEFT) (SR 821) Bird Road (SW 40th Street) to SR 836 RFP Development Improvements of HEFT (3.15 miles) which includes Express Lanes, Bridge Construction, sound walls, drainage, ITS, lighting and utility relocations. Sr. Utility Coordinator responsible for identifying the list of all existing utility agency/owners (UAO): Agency, name, address, phone(s), email, Identify the general locations of all existing facilities including the facility type, size/ voltage, pipe material, etc. (obtain the utility "greenlines" from all identified UAO's). Work with lighting, signals, tolls, future toll sites and ITS to determine service points. Hold a design build utility information meeting to discuss the project scope with UAO's. Identify how the utility exists (i.e., within the public roadway right-of-way, within easement, on private property, previously subordinated, etc.). Identify UAO's special concerns or risk and how could' it be mitigated. If relocation is required to accommodate the project, obtain a ballpark (order of magnitude) cost estimate for relocation and if the UAO require additional right-of-way or could relocation occur within the existing right-of-way envelope. Review and comment of Design -Build Firms letters of Interest as it relates to utility coordination. • SW 264th Street Improvements (US 1 to SW 137th Avenue), Miami -Dade County, Florida - Project Engineer involved with the design for the proposed street improvements for SW 264th Street (approx. 0.74 miles). Design elements included a new configuration for SW 264th Street with a two lane divided roadway within an 80 foot right of way. The proposed corridor design consisted of standard travel lanes, bicycle lanes; parking stalls with landscape bump -outs after every second parking stall, a landscaped median, traffic separator, standard curb and gutter, sidewalk, school bus drop-off, pavement marking and signage, roadway lighting and report, school zone with applicable markings, signs and flashers, and modification of existing traffic signal at US -1. Design elements of storm water management included over 3,150 feet of exfiltration trench, 2,000 feet of solid pipe, 45 drainage structures, pollution control structure with an emergency overflow into Naranja Canal with a rip -rap end -wall and manatee grate. Duties also included preliminary field investigations, utility coordination, computation book, drainage report, detailed cost estimates and permitting through DERM. • South Miami Downtown Improvements Phase IV, South Miami, Florida - Civil Designer involved with street and drainage improvements. Design elements included over 200 feet of exfiltration trench, 200 feet of solid pipe, ten drainage structures, milling and resurfacing of roadway, side walk, curb and gutter stripping & signing landscaping and irrigation and maintenance of traffic (MOT) plans. Also responsible for the production of demolition, geometry paving grading and drainage, typical sections and detail, landscaping and irrigation plans. Duties also included drainage report and detailed cost estimates. • Village of Pinecrest Pavement Evaluation and Four -Year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Plan, Village of Pinecrest, Florida Engineer of Record responsible for developing Pavement Management System (PMS) for approximately 120 miles of Village owned road. Automated field data of pavement distresses were collected with Stantec's RT3000 vehicle and loaded into MicroPaver to determine Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI is a subjective method of evaluating distresses in pavement by providing a numerical rating between 0 and 100 where 0 is worst and 100 is best condition. Utilizing MicroPaver, prediction/deterioration models were developed to predict future pavement conditions and identify Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) projects. Stantec completed a final report which included a strategic Four -Year M&R work plan and a budget analysis to address these projects. The recommended projects were integrated into a Village map using GIS which was presented to the Village Council for approval. • Via Vizcaya Drainage Improvements, Palm Beach, Florida - Civil Designer involved with street and drainage improvements. Design elements included over 750 feet of solid pipe, sixteen drainage structures, and roadway restoration. Also responsible for the production of demolition, geometry paving grading and drainage, typical sections and detail. Duties also included drainage report and detailed cost estimates. • SR 862 (I 595) West of 136th Street to east of the Turnpike, Design Build P3, Broward County, FDOT District 4 - Senior Utility Coordinator for the proposed P3 improvements of an approximate 10 -mile section of SR 862 (1 595) west of 136th Street to east of the Turnpike. The project includes the coordination of conflict resolution with a total of 18 UAO facilities in the area of the project. Responsible for the design and development of Utility Adjustment Plans and cost estimates for relocation work. Responsible for producing plans specification and cost estimates for the relocation of facilities owned by the City of Sunrise and the Town of Davie, and for coordinating reimbursable agreements with all UAO facilities in the area of the project. Stantec Resumes Gerard Hills Senior Inspector Gerard has over 20 years of experience in all phases of construction engineering inspection and testing on roadway and building projects. His duties have included inspections, coordination, and testing of water and sewer, roadway, drainage, utilities, and electrical and industrial facilities. In working with various municipal, county, state and private clients, Gerard has ensured a successful product is delivered to the client. Education Civil Engineering, General Academic Courses, Kingborough College, 1995 Machine Shop/ Drafting Certificate, San Fernando Technical Institute, Trinidad & Tobago, W.I.,1989 CXC Certificate, Naparima Boys College, Trinidad & Tobago, W.I., 1986 Associate in Science, Palm Beach Community College, Lake Worth, Florida, 1995 Certifications Nuclear Gauge Radiation Safety Training ACI Concrete Level I CTQP Earthwork Levels I & II Asphalt Paving Levels I &II FDOT Intermediate Work Zone Traffic Control Certification I Stantec Select project experience • Watermain Rep., Sanitary Sewer System & MDC-WASD Pump Station Upgrades, Key Biscayne, Florida - Inspector responsible for providing engineering services for this project which included the site clearing, earthwork and grading, pavement construction, construction of sewage collection system and lateral connection, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, fire hydrants, watermain replacement including valves and appurtenances, landscaping and roadway/ right-of-way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. • Capital Improvements Program, Golden Beach, Florida - Inspector for comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan that focuses on several major improvement areas: town - wide drainage improvements; utilities underground relocation (electrical, telephone, cable); and town -wide streetscape & traffic calming. The Master Plan carefully considered the each of these with respect to feasibility, cost/benefit, and design, as well as an analysis of funding options and scenarios, and schedule for phasing and implementation. • American Expressway Improvements and Midtown Greenway Transit Route, Plantation, Florida - Inspector for the reconstruction of 2.5 miles of mixed use walkways, textured crosswalks, parallel parking, landscaped medians, and a roundabout at a key intersection of the City. As the first phase of a large project, our design will be the template for all improvements to follow in the City's midtown area. As part of the City's master plan, a greenway transit route for the entire midtown area is included. • Highland Village Water, Sewer, & Drainage Improvements, North Miami Beach, Florida - Inspector responsible for the construction inspection services consist of on-site personnel to provide the construction engineering administration services including but not limited to overseeing, coordinating and inspecting the work of surveyors and construction contractors. Responsibilities include monitoring, record keeping, approving and recommending requisitions for compensation, review of change orders, estimations, claims, scheduling, shop drawings and remedial designs. We also provided responses to Requests for Information (RFI) and assuring compliance with all local, state and federal regulations, on behalf of the City of North Miami Beach. • Florida International University System Evaluation Survey (SSES) Campuswide, Modesto Maidique Campus, Miami, Florida - Construction Inspector for the implementation of the SSES, consisting of inventorying the existing gravity collection system, cleaning, TV inspection, and smoke testing of all the sanitary sewer lines, laterals, and manholes in nine pump station areas at the main campus and the Computer Engineering and Applied Science Campus. Contractor surveyed approximately 40,000 linear feet of pipes, 152 manholes, and 280 laterals. At the time of the SSES, FIU had approximately 220,000 gallons per day of infiltration and inflow (I&I). The purpose of the SSES was to determine the conditions and severity of defects requiring repairs. Plans and specifications are currently being prepared for the necessary system repairs, with phases corresponding to the priority of the repairs, based on the amount of I&I. In total, about one-fourth of the pipes and manholes require repairs and rehabilitation. The repair and rehabilitation work was performed with ARRA funds in approximately one third of the time allocated. • Miami -Dade County Roadway Improvements, Miami, Florida - Inspector for this project which consisted of supervising all operations necessary for the construction of a new 4 -lane divided roadway along SW 157th Avenue including a new bridge aver the C -IW Canal. The work included new sidewalk, curb and gutter, median, a storm water drainage system, signage, pavement markings, signalization, and street lighting. The scope also included new construction of a 2- lane Gerard Hill Page 2 Resumes roadway on SW 120th Street; construction of a new 16" water main along SW 157th Avenue; construction of 16" water main along SW 120th Street; and installation of a 36" sewer force main along SW 157th Avenue, as part of the overall wastewater master plan to complete a connection north of SW 112th Street. • Village of Key Biscayne Zones 1 & 4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement, Key Biscayne, Florida - Construction inspector responsible for assisting with the administration of sanitary sewers, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement including valves and appurtenances, and roadway/right-of-way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. • Village of Key Biscayne Zones 2 & 3 Reclaimed Water & Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer, Key Biscayne, Florida - Inspector responsible for this project that included the construction of sanitary sewers, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, lateral connections, fire hydrants, watermain replacement including valves and appurtenances, and roadway/right-of-way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. In addition to observing the on-going work, digital pictures were taken at every visit to record the project progress. • Sub -Aqueous Electrical Crossing at SFWMD Canal C-103 & SW 147th Avenue, Homestead, Florida - Inspector responsible for the project which consists of the furnishings of two 10' x 10' reinforced concrete manholes, which will be connected by approximately 555 linear feet of conduit installed by horizontal directional drilling and connecting the manhole to existing cables installed by others. The drilling path will cross under the SFWMD Canal C-103. The conduit to be placed shall be 26" diameter DR9 High Density Polyethylene installed inside. The 4-6" diameter conduits shall be installed with pull strings for future electrical wiring installation. As an alternate bid, the installed conduit shall be 4-8" diameter DR9 High Density Polyethylene pipe bundled together with no larger diameter pipe installed. • Downtown Drainage and Water Main Improvements, South Miami, Florida Inspector responsible for the construction of Downtown Drainage and Water Main Improvements at SW 73rd Street, SW 58th Avenue and SW 58th Court. It consisted of the installation of exfiltration trenches, concrete catch basins and solid pipes composing a drainage system, parts of which will serve as street drainage upon completion, and parts of which will be left dry until the full redevelopment of these roadways. The project also involves the installation of a 12" water main loop on SW 58th Court, SW 73rd Street and SW 58th Avenue, installation of new service lines from the water main to existing and new meters, restoration of asphalt pavement, concrete curbs and gutters, driveway and landscapes in a residential neighborhood. • Claude Pepper Park, North Miami, Florida - Civil Inspector for this multifaceted project included design, permitting and construction management for North Miami Wastewater Pump Station, forcemain, and external water main extension along SR 916 including fire protection. The proposed utilities serve a project which consisted of a $5.5 million multi-purpose youth center which includes gymnasium, classrooms, youth training center and health center. Services also included parking lot drainage, fire protection, and general site development. This project was certified a GOLD LEED building. Sustainable design and construction methods were being used throughout the project for environmental benefits. • North West South River Drive Relocation and Stormwater Improvements, Medley, Florida - Inspector for this project that comprises Phase 1 of two Phases and of the construction of approximately 1,500 linear feet of municipal roadway (2 - lane) construction, including associated stormwater system improvements and coordination with the proposed Medley Linear Park project. This phase included the relocation of the road (demolition and new construction), the supply and installation of storm pipes, exfiltration trenches catch basins, manholes and all appurtenances associated with the drainage system. Also including the use, inspection, cleaning and connection with the existing drainage system, construction of swales, concrete curb and gutters and valley gutters, driveway approaches, concrete sidewalk, landscaping which includes sodding and restoration of existing plants and trees, removal and disposal off-site excavation materials. The construction inspection services included overseeing, coordinating and inspecting the work of surveyors and construction contractors. Responsibilities included monitoring, record keeping, approving and recommending requisitions for compensation, review of change orders, estimations, claims, scheduling, shop drawings and remedial designs. • Homestead Air Reserve Park — Phase I, Homestead, Florida - Inspector for the master planning, design, permitting, and construction of over 4,000 linear feet of 12" and 16" watermain. The watermain will service all future development phases of the park. Project responsibilities also included the design and permitting of two soccer fields and two parking lots as part of the next phase of park construction. Stantec Resumes Fernando Vargas Senior Inspector Fernando has over 12 years of experience in materials testing and inspection services in both the public and private sectors. His duties have included sampling and field and laboratory testing of soils and concrete. He has served as lead project inspector for public projects of various scope including water and sewer, drainage, roadway, utilities and industrial. The water and sewer projects include new facilities, retrofitting of existing facilities, and repairs to existing systems. Monitoring of costs and schedule throughout these projects ensures the client is always receiving a quality product on time and within budget. Certifications FDOT, Asphalt Paving Tech Level 1, 2013 ACI Level I Field Technician, 2012 Certified Nuclear Gauge Operator, 2012 Nuclear Safety Certification MOT Level II CTQP Earthwork Level I Stontec Select protect experience • CEI Construction Services - Miami Center for the Performing Arts/ Biscayne Boulevard "Superblock" Streetscape Improvements, Miami, Florida - Inspector responsible for inspection support and all materials testing for a high profile roadway reconstruction and resurfacing project in downtown Miami including: paver brick pavement, Superpave asphalt, decorative lighting, signalization, drainage, striping, signage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and landscaping. • Golden Beach Capital Improvements Program Master Plan, Golden Beach - Inspector for this comprehensive Capital Improvements Program Master Plan which focused on three major improvement areas. Town -wide Drainage Improvements. These improvements included design review, costs analysis, and recommendations based on the Town's existing stormwater master plan which includes construction inlets and culverts to collect and direct stormwater runoff to pumping stations discharging into the intercoastal waterway. Utilities Underground Relocation (electrical, telephone, cable). These improvements included a thorough analysis of the Town's existing power system configuration, and close coordination with FPL and other utility companies in developing a conceptual plan for burying all utility transmission and distribution lines throughout the entire Town. Town -wide Streetscape & Traffic Calming. The Town's major thoroughfares and side streets were redefined and enhanced to increase public safety, and improve the quality of life and aesthetic appeal. Improvements included highlighting intersections with concrete pavers and crosswalks, delineating of roadways with valley edge gutters, construction of traffic splitter islands and center median with new landscaping, and new lighting. • Drainage and Stormwater Planning & Design Belle Meade Drainage Improvements, Miami, Florida - Inspector for this $8 million project which consisted of the design and permitting of a drainage improvement project encompassing several miles of road in developed flood -prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and gravity wells and discharging to the Miami River. Permitting included pre/post analysis and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. • Belle Meade Drainage Improvements, Miami, Florida - Inspector for this $8 million project which consisted of the design and permitting of a drainage improvement project encompassing several miles of road in developed flood -prone neighborhood providing quality treatment through the use of exfiltration trenches and gravity wells and discharging to the Miami River. Permitting included pre/ post analysis and stage calculation for Miami-Dade's Class II Surface Water Management Permit. • Miami Gardens Canal Stabilization & Repairs, Miami Gardens, Florida - Construction Administrator for this design -build project which included the canal bank stabilization for over 3000 linear feet of canal bank, 2 large culvert headwalls, reconstruction of 12 stormwater outfalls, and outfalls structures. A stabilization synthetic stacking system was used for the canal bank to reestablish the banks by preventing future erosion. Permitting included a Class III permit throughout PERA Water, Miami -Dade Public Works. The project design included a stormwater pollution prevention plan, environmental designs including manatee grates, and maintenance of traffic. Additionally, the project also included grant management. Resumes Fernando Vargas Page 2 • Florida International University W1 Lift Station, Modesto Maidique Campus, Miami, Florida (Lead Inspector) - Lead Inspector for this project that consisted of a new submersible wastewater lift station to replace an old out dated station which exhibited leaks and deterioration. The new station included three 45 horsepower pumps, new control panel, ultrasonic level sensors, magnetic flow meter and gas detection system. This important station handles all of the wastewater transmission for the West and South areas of the Modesto Maidique Campus. • Florida International University Central Utilities (LS1) Lift Station, Modesto Maidique Campus, Miami, Florida - Rehabilitation and improvements to FIU's MMC's primary lift station. The project consisted of the conversion of line -shaft pumps to dry -pit mounted submersible pumps and increased the capacity to 45 Horsepower. A full electrical upgrade was also performed. • Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repairs (Phase 3), Medley, Florida - Inspector for this sanitary sewer rehabilitation and repair of Pump Station Areas 105. The project included cleaning of sanitary sewer lines, testing of sanitary sewer joint connections, grouting of cracks, lining or partial lining of damaged sanitary sewers, root removals, replacement of sewer pipes and manholes, and repairs of sanitary manholes. • Reclaimed Water Distribution System, Key Biscayne, Florida - Inspector for this project which consisted of the installation of a Reclaimed Water Distribution System from the Northern Village limits running south, primarily along Fernwood Road, to West Mashta Drive including residential and commercial service lines, valves, roadway/right-of-way restoration, and other related work. • Village of Key Biscayne Zones 1 & 4 Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Replacement, Key Biscayne, Florida - Construction inspector responsible for assisting with the administration of sanitary sewers, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement including valves and appurtenances, and roadway/right-of-way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. • Village of Key Biscayne Zones 2 & 3 Reclaimed Water & Line Replacement Sanitary Sewer, Key Biscayne, Florida - Inspector responsible for this project that included the construction of sanitary sewers, manholes, existing pump station upgrades and modifications, lateral connections, fire hydrants, water main replacement including valves and appurtenances, and roadway/right-of-way restoration, and other related work as shown on the plans. In addition to observing the on-going work, digital pictures were taken at every visit to record the project progress. • NW 82nd Avenue Improvements, Doral, Florida - Inspector for this project which included the study, design, and construction administration of various improvements on NW 82nd Avenue from NW 12th Street to NW 25th Street. It consisted of milling and resurfacing, sidewalk and curb and gutter replacement and reconstruction, handicap ramp replacement, and drainage work including the installation of exfiltration trenches, concrete manholes and solid pipes. The project also involved the repair of damaged asphalt around existing manholes, valves, and above existing drainage trenches and crossings. The final design also included pavement markings and signage. • Doral Grande, Atlantic and Pacific Developments, Doral, Florida - Inspector for this project that consisted of the design and permitting of a regional WASD Wastewater Pump Station for the entire half section. Project included design, permitting of water main system and 20" wastewater forcemain donated to Miami -Dade WASD, Project also included full construction management including inspections and engineering support. The proposed utilities serve a 30 Acre site being developed into a 300 apartment residential community in Doral. Other services also included drainage, striping, signage, geometry and. development of adjacent right of ways. • Miami -Dade County Roadway Improvements, Miami, Florida - Inspector for this project which consists of supervising all operations necessary for the construction of a new 4 -lane divided roadway along SW 157th Avenue (from SW 120th Street to SW 112th Street) including a new bridge over the C -IW Canal. The work includes new sidewalk, curb and gutter, median, a storm water drainage system, signage, pavement markings, signalization, and street lighting. The scope also include the new construction of a 2- lane roadway on SW 120th Street (from SW 157th Avenue to 1800 feet West of SW 157th Avenue), the construction of a new 16" water main along SW 157th Avenue (from SW 112th Street to SW 120th Street), the construction of 16" water main along SW 120th Street (from SW 157th Avenue to SW 162nd Avenue), and the installation of a 36" sewer force main along SW 157th Avenue (from SW 112th Street to SW 120th Street), as part of the overall wastewater master plan to complete a connection north of SW 112th Street. Slantec Resumes Ancy Alexander Senior Inspector Andy has over 14 years of engineering experience which includes working in the field as an Inspector, Senior Inspector, Senior Bridge Inspector, and Drill Shaft Inspector. His experience includes milling and resurfacing, roadway reconstruction and widening, major earthwork, construction bridge rehabilitation, bridge replacement, as well as coatings inspection. He has also been responsible for various engineering tasks that include signing and sealing final as -built plans, technical report writing, claims analysis, man-hour estimates, correspondence with key stakeholders, and ensuring that projects are constructed in reasonable conformance with plans and specifications. He has a strong understanding of engineering specifications, construction practices and methodologies. Education Southern Academy High, Trinidad and Tobago Certifications TIN#A425002683050 Asphalt Paving - Level l Asphalt Paving - Level 2 Concrete Field Tech - Level 1 Drilled Shaft Earthwork Construction Inspection - Level 1 Earthwork Construction Inspection - Level 2 Final Estimates - Level 1 ACI Concrete Field Testing 1 Critical Structures Hazmat Nuclear Guage Safety Training IMSA Traffic Signal Level 1 Intermediate MOT Select project exper!ence • Palm and Hibiscus Islands, Miami Beach, FL - Inspector for this design/build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and to combat the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes watermain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads where possible and harmonization to properties, concrete work including sidewalks, the undergrounding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light (FPL), AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and large pump stations to discharge into Biscayne Bay. Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance of traffic had to be carefully monitored at all times. Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents is minimized. • City of West Palm Beach; Tamarind Avenue Streetscape (Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. to 25th Street)*, Project FM # 429655-1-58-01- Andy was Senior Inspector for this project that included construction of curbed bulb -outs, cross walks, drainage system modifications and installation of additional landscaping, benches, trash receptacles, specialty pavement, striping, signage and an irrigation system. • General Assigned Contract; SRA1A Bridge No. 860011 Over Hillsboro Inlet*, FDOT District 4, Project FM # 425935-1-52-01/425935-1-52-02 - Andy was Senior Inspector for this project. Improvements included removal of existing concrete and replace concrete deck, construction of a new sidewalk and pedestrian railing along south side of bridge, new traffic railings along both sides of bridge, upgrade fender system, restoration of existing tender house, installation of decorative statue and accent lighting, removal and re painting of bridge. • City of Oakland Park, NE 34th Court Improvements (Between NE 2nd Avenue and llth Avenue)*, Project FM #429653-1-58-01, Fed #8886109A - This project included installation of storm drain piping and structures, water mains. Infrastructure improvements both in public right-of-way and private property, including landscaping, driveways, pavement, sidewalks, fences and other miscellaneous items. Andy was Senior Inspector for this project. • City of Oakland Park; NE 38th Street/Park Lane East Project (from NE 11th Avenue to Andrews Avenue)*, LAP Project FM #427767-1- 58/68-01. (LAP Funded $1,621,004) - Senior Inspector. Scope of work for this project included installation of storm drain piping and structures, sanitary sewer main relocations, landscaping, irrigation and decorative lighting. • I-595 Express Corridor Improvements*, FDOT District 4, ($1.25 B) P3 Project (in partnership with HTNB) - The project extended from the 1-75/ Sawgrass Expressway interchange to the I -595/I-95 interchange. The corridor improvements along this 10.5 miles of roadway included: Tolled, reversible, ground -level express lanes within the median of I-595, Safety modifications to the I-595/Florida Turnpike interchange , Continuous connection of SR 84 between Davie Road and SR 7/US 441, Auxiliary lanes on I-595 with combined ramps, cross -road bypasses and grade separated entrance and exit ramps. The express lanes consist of three tolled, reversible Express Lanes. Each lane is 12 feet wide with a full 10 -foot shoulder on each side. "denotes projects completed with other firms Stantec Resumes Andy Alexander Page 2 • I-75 (Alligator Alley) at Recreational Access MM 54.0*, FDOT District 1, Project FM #200741-1-62-01 - Senior Inspector. Construction consisted of a recreational access facility located on SR 93/1-75 at the L-28 interceptor canal. The project entailed construction of a 75 space parking lot, boat ramp into the L-28 canal, access to the trailhead within the Big Cypress National Preserve, on and offramp attached to 1-75 westbound and stormwater management facilities. Also included ITS services that involved relocation of 4,900 LF of underground fiber optic, 400 LF of overhead (aerial connection) fiber optic and relocation of 11 Lee County electrical poles. • SR 802/Lake Worth Road (Congress Avenue to West of Lake Osbourne Drive)*, FDOT District 4, Project FM #422990-1 - Senior Inspector. Improvements included milling and resurfacing, ADA and safety upgrades, pedestrian signal upgrades, irrigation and bridge railing upgrades on SR 802. • SR 708/ Blue Heron Blvd. (at Old Dixie Highway) Safety Project*, FDOT District 4, Project FM #411431-2 - Senior Inspector. Construction included minor roadway widening, drilled shafts, signing, pavement markings, installation of traffic control devices on FEC's cantilever truss, synchronization devices for eastbound and westbound Blue Heron Boulevard. All this was in lieu of modifications of the existing railway crossing on the east leg of the intersection and replacement of FEC's overhead signal bridge. • Resurfacing SR 5/US 1/Federal Highway (from C-16 Canal to Hypoluxo Road) and SR 5/US 1(from South of SR 794/ Yamato Road to South of C-15 Canal)*, FDOT District 4, Project FM #415311- 1-62-01/416897-1-62-01 - Senior Inspector. Construction consisted of milling and resurfacing, drainage, pipe lining, signalization and landscaping improvements for two major arterials that have transverse urban commercial areas in Palm Beach County. • Hallandale Beach Blvd. (from I-95 to US1) Construction* (approx. 5 miles)*, FDOT District 4 - Senior Roadway Inspector. Construction consisted of installation of street lights, curb and gutter removal/replacement, landscaping of medians, signalization, asphalt paving and striping, repair sidewalks and cut traffic congestion. • 1-95 HOV Expansion, North of Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard to North of Blue Heron. Boulevard (Approx. 21 miles), FDOT District 4 - Drill Shaft Inspector. Project included widening 1-95 from six and eight lanes to ten and 12 lanes (including HOV lanes); widening the existing S.R. 710 (Beeline Highway) bridge; replacing the existing bridges over 45th Street and Blue Heron Boulevard; reconstruction of the mainline ramps as well as portions of 45th Street and Blue Heron Boulevard; and included drainage improvements, retaining walls, signing and pavement markings, lighting, landscaping, irrigation and communications elements. • 1-75 ICA Hurricane Wilma Repair (approx. 10 miles)*, FDOT District 4 - Drill Shaft Inspector. Duties included supervision of drilling, inspection of rebar cages and cage 1 installation, concrete placement and installation of sonotubes and bolts, and relocation of existing signage. • Sawgrass Expressway/SR 869 Widening (Coral Ridge Drive to Florida's Turnpike (approx. 20 miles)*, FDOT District 4 & Turnpike - inspector. Construction consisted of widening the Sawgrass Expressway from four to six lanes, construction of sound walls and other improvements. Duties included inspection of earthwork and drilled shaft installation. Stantee Resumes Rene Brito Senior Inspector Rene has over 31 years of construction engineering inspection experience which includes key roles such as Inspector and Senior Inspector. His well-rounded experience includes project involving surveying, milling and resurfacing, roadway reconstruction and widening, major earthwork, stormwater improvements, watermain extensions, sewer extensions and upgrades, decorative street lighting, specialty pavement, landscaping improvements, seawalls, pumps stations, and marinas. He has a strong understanding of engineering specifications, construction practices, and contractor methodologies thus ensuring that projects are constructed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and in accordance with required building codes. During his career he has taken great pride in assisting clients and owners with receiving a quality product on-time and within budget. Education Coral Park Senior High, Miami, FL Certifications FEMA National Incident Management System (NIMS) IS00700 ICS100 Incident Command System IS00100 Qualified Stornwater Management Inspector #17635 Mangrove Maintenance Short Course Stormwater Operator Level 1 #SW10319 Select project experience • Pump Station North of Convention Center, Miami Beach, FL - Senior Inspector representing the City of Miami Beach. Rene was in charge of coordinating and inspecting all aspects of this new large stormwater pump station. The pump station was designed to handle large quantities of stormwater by connecting to a new 96" diameter reinforced HDPE drainage pipe. The station includes ajunction structure, dual treatment structures, wet well, overflow bypass and dissipater box. A total of four axial flow stainless steel pumps will transfer stormwater into the Collins Canal. A new FPL duct bank had to be provided to meet the power needs of the station. Responsibilities included ensuring all environmental controls were in place on a daily basis. • SAIA Site Improvements, Miami, FL - Senior Inspector for this paving and drainage project at a busy trucking facility. Construction had to be phased in order to keep the truck operations open at all times. Improvements included a new continuous drainage system, replacement of damaged concrete slabs, fencing and security upgrades, site lighting, restoration, ADA upgrades, and paving. Sandy soil had to be monitored during construction to ensure a safe trench was maintained for pipe installation. • Key Biscayne Dog Park, Key Biscayne, FL - Construction inspector for a new 22,000 square foot dog park. The park is divided for large dogs and small dogs and includes various site amenities/ improvements. The improvements include artificial turf throughout, a decorative entrance trellis, fencing, decorative benches and umbrellas, pathways, water fountains, spray hydrants, heavy landscaping, irrigation, drainage, grading, and site lighting. We incorporated the placement of trees to augment the current planting and lower level shrubs to help keep the dogs from distraction by activities of the adjacent park while still affording safety and visibility to the dog's owners. Our services included the planning, cost estimating, design, permitting, and construction support. The park opened in September 2016. • PTP Paving Multi -Year Program, Cutler Bay, Florida - Senior Inspector for this multi-year paving program in which various streets were milled and resurfaced based on the study and recommendations provided to the Town. During construction, our field inspector was on-site during all paving activities and assisted with field modifications throughout the work. New thermoplastic striping and reflective pavement markers were also provided. This contract is completed annually based on the Town's available budget. • Grove Park Phase 2: Miami, Florida - Senior Inspector for this critical area of drainage improvements. The Grove Park area just south of State Road 836 has a history of flooding and low lying homes have been in need of relief for quite some time. After studying the area, it was determined that utilizing an existing outfall as well as providing a new connection to the existing large pump station would provide the best relief. This project, though challenging during construction, was completed on time and provided the necessary drainage solution. Construction activities and lanes closures had to be coordinated with the Miami Marlins baseball home schedule due to the proximity to the stadium. • Villagewide Paving CEI, Pinecrest, Florida - Senior Inspector for this multi-year paving program in which various streets were milled and resurfaced. Our scope included field assessments of existing ADA facilitates and compilation of paving plans to meet the Village's annual $1 ° denotes projects completed with other firms Slantec Rene Brito Page 2 Resumes million paving budget. During construction, our inspector was on-site during all paving activities and assisted with field modifications throughout the work. • Cutler Bay Bus Shelters, Cutler Bay, Florida - Inspector for these unique bus shelters designed to fit the look and feel of the Town of Cutler Bay. Three options were developed, rendered and presented to the Town for review and selection. The final selection consisted of natural coral rock columns, exposed painted steel beams, and a standing seam metal roof. A decorative bench, trash can, and bike rack completed the design and the first set of shelters was implemented on Caribbean Boulevard. Stantec Resumes Ricarc o Julien Senior Inspector Ricardo has over 15 years of experience in the construction of civil engineering projects and overseeing all phases of multimillion -dollar construction, infrastructure, superfund and environmental projects for diverse sector clients. Experience includes managing crews of up to 150 in a variety of construction/demolition projects. He has strong credentials and a proven history of on-time, on -budget and high-quality project completions. His experience includes: construction and demolition projects, site safety/OSHA compliance, change order management, budgeting and cost controls, bidding, estimating and proposals, and subcontractor and crew supervision. Education Naparima Boys College, Trinidad and Tobago - High School Diploma Select project experience • The Seasons Over 55 Community*, Farmingville, NY - Construction Project Manager for this over 55 community on a 9 -acre property involving 310 new properties. The new development required extensive drainage and sewer improvements. After studies and analysis were conducted, it was determined that a private sewer treatment system was required. All construction activities and lane closures had to be coordinated with Suffolk County Department of Public Works and particular attention has to be given to safety and maintenance of vehicular traffic. This project was successfully completed on time. • Ocean Grande Condominiums*, Rockaway Beach, NY - Construction Project Manager for this 61 unit building. After studying several drainage options, it was determined that using an existing outfall, as well as providing a new connection to the existing large pump station would be the best solution for the critical area of drainage improvements. Water, sewer, and fire connections, along with the associated restoration was also required to support the development. A new on-site parking lot including lighting and landscaping and an underground parking garage with extensive dewatering efforts were successfully completed as well. Despite several challenges, this project was completed on time. • Bristol Assisted Living Facility*, Northport, NT - Construction Project Manager for this 250 unit assisted living facility. It was determined that an on-site water and sewer treatment system was needed. Along with the utility and roadway work, a parking lot with lighting, landscaping and concrete curbing was also completed. Construction activities and lane closures had to be coordinated with Suffolk County Department of Public Works. This project was completed on time and provided the necessary drainage solutions. • Bristol Assisted Living Facility*, Sayville, NY - Construction Project Manager for this completely new 400 unit assisted living facility. Various infrastructure improvements were required to support the development including a connection to an existing pump station, 4 miles of sewer force main installation, and the connecting to an existing drainage outfall for proper stormwater discharge. This project, though challenging during construction was completed on time and provided the necessary improvements both on-site and off-site. • Bristol Assisted Living Facility*, Lake Success, NY - Construction Project Manager for much needed drainage infrastructure improvements. This area had a long history of flooding and low lying homes have been in need of relief for quite some time. It was determined that improving an existing outfall, as well as providing a new connection to the existing large pump station would be the best relief. All construction activities and lane closures had to be coordinated with Nassau. County Department of Public Works and special attention had to be given to the Maintenance of Traffic plan at all times. This project was completed on time and within budget. • The Engel Burman Group*, Garden City, NY - As a project manager, completed diverse construction and demolition projects, including the ground -up build of assisted living facilities, over 55 communities, and condominiums. Involved in managing commercial office space renovations and abandoned warehouse demolitions. Created and executed project work plans and revised as appropriate to meet changing needs and requirements. Identified resources needed and assigned individual responsibilities, Managed day-to-day operational aspects of full project scope. Reviewed deliverables prepared by the team before submitting to the client. Effectively applied company methodology and enforced project standards. " denotes projects completed with other firms Sfantec Ahmed Al Inspector asri Resumes Ahmed has over 11 years of experience in the design and construction of civil engineering projects. His experience includes conducting utility feasibility studies, water monitoring studies, inspection of concrete repair work, and construction inspection and oversight of civil infrastructure projects. His duties during construction have also included change order reviews, maintenance of traffic conformance, specifications, schedule review, quality control, summary of quantities, and general project management. He takes pride in assisting clients and owners with delivering projects using various contractual methods to ensure that a final product is delivered on-time and within budget. Education Master of Sciences in Civil Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, 2015 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Baghdad, 2006 Select project experience • Palm and Hibiscus Islands, Miami Beach, FL - Inspector for this.design/build project which involves complete infrastructure reconstruction with primary goals including beautification and to combat the effects of sea level rise. Scope of work includes watermain and water service replacement, rehabilitation of the existing gravity sanitary sewer line and manholes, complete stormwater infrastructure improvements, roadway reconstruction including raising roads where possible and harmonization to properties, concrete work including sidewalks, the undergrounding of overhead utilities for Florida Power & Light (FPL), AT&T, and Atlantic Broadband, and landscaping. The stormwater systems include a primary and secondary gravity collection system and large pump stations to discharge into Biscayne Bay. Environmental controls during construction and all maintenance of traffic had to be carefully monitored at all times. Close coordination with City staff and homeowners is most important to ensure impact to residents is minimized. • Sea Ranch Club Building `C', 5100 N Ocean Blvd*, Fort Lauderdale, Florida - Construction Inspector for building rehabilitation, This residential ocean -front building suffered from extensive damage due to the climate and salt water, The location and environment contributed to deterioration of the external surfaces of the building and an evaluation was conducted determine the required repair solutions. The scope of work included concrete removal and replacement, stucco replacement, new balcony flooring, and painting. The work was inspected on a daily basis and ultimately approved by the local municipality, Lauderdale -By -The -Sea. • Citrix Systems Parking Garage Rehabilitation*, 851 W Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL - Construction Inspector for building rehabilitation. The building suffered from the various deterioration impact due to the climate. The location and environment resulted in spalled and damaged concrete joists of the building. A detailed structural evaluation was conducted to determine the concrete work required for proper restoration. Concrete repairs were successfully implemented and other work was conducted including joint sealing, new flooring, and painting. Daily activities were reviewed and coordinated in order to obtain final sign -off from the local municipality. • Potable Water Evaluation Study*, Wasit Province, Iraq - Associate Advisor for RTI International in, Durham, NC, responsible for monitoring and preparing this potable water utility service study within the Province of Wasit in Iraq. The client requested assistance with planning and implementing a water monitoring survey for the level of water service in Kut city. This neighborhood was selected as a pilot for survey work and a service satisfaction form was obtained for each residence. Water samples were obtained and tested from the existing service network with collaboration of Kut environmental laboratory. Results were compared with the samples taken from water located at the treatment plant, and the results of the study were summarized and presented to the engineering department in Wasit Province Hall. • Water Treatment Units, Wasit Province*, Iraq -Engineer for the construction of new treatment units to service scattered villages in the Wasit Province. The Province required a new water supply system and the use of these compact units was determined to be the most feasible option for extending this much needed utility. The development was funded by the Central government and construction was managed daily during the duration of the work. The project was successfully • denotes projects completed with other firms Stantec Resumes Ahmed Aibasrf Page 2 completed on-time to efficiently provide the villagers with clean drinking water. • A1-Zahraa Neighborhood Development*, Wasit Province, Iraq - Construction Engineer for this complete neighborhood development. The neighborhood had a history of flooding, especially during the rainy seasons, thus requiring a complete storm water collection network using gravity pipes and the associated drainage structures. A new stormwater pump station was also required especially during extreme rain events. A new sanitary sewer system was also installed so that the homes could be connected to the central treatment plant of the city. The project as successfully completed on-time and within budget. . Kut Water Treatment Station*, Wasit Province, Iraq - Construction Engineer for new Power and Chemical buildings. Kut city in Iraq had a need for new water supply for the neighborhood population. The treatment station and location were set to implement a new 50 million gallon per day treatment plant in order to replenish the safe drinking water supply to the city. Although construction implementation faced many challenges, quick field reviews and re -design of the foundations for the sedimentation tanks assisted to deliver the project on-time. The work was ultimately approved by the Ministry of Municipals Work in Baghdad Stantec obl° Garcia, PE Structural Project Engineer Resumes Pablo has over 7 years of experience and is a Structural Engineer in Stantec's Miami office. His experience includes justice, resi- dential, hospitality, healthcare, sports and mixed use projects. Education Master of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 2010 Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 2010 Registration Professional Engineer #77111, State of Florida Stantec Select project experience • Lipscomb Residence, Miami Beach, Florida - Project Engineer for 3 -story, 5,000 SF private. residence. • 520 Lakeview Ct, Miami Beach, Florida - Project Engineer for 2 -story, 7,000 SF private residence. • 801 Lincoln Road, Miami Beach, Florida - Project Engineer for 3 -story, 39,000 SF retail building • Miami -Dade Children's Courthouse, Miami, Florida— Project Engineer for 14 -story, 378,000 SF courthouse. • 250 Ocean Boulevard, Golden Beach, Florida - Project Engineer for 2 -story, 6,000 SF private residence. • 240 Ocean Boulevard, Golden Beach, Florida Project Engineer for 3 -story, 6,000 SF private residence. • Judge Seymour Gelber and Judge William E. Gladstone Miami -Dade Children's Courthouse, Miami, Florida - Project Engineer for 15 -story courthouse. • Cypress Creek Ambulatory Surgical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida - Project Engineer for 2 -story, 80,000 SF ambulatory surgical center. • Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Naples, Florida - Project Engineer for 2 -story, 22,000 SF clinical eye center. • Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kendall, Florida - Project Engineer for four buildings: Cancer Center, Research Building, 950 car staff garage, 450 car visitor's garage. • General Funding Office Building, Miami, Florida - Project Engineer for 7 -story, 110,000 SF mixed use building with ground boor retail, 136 car parking garage and 45,000 SF of offices. • GLF Headquarters, Miami, Florida - Project Engineer for 4 -story, 50,000 SF office building. • Flagler Station Residence Inn, Miami, Florida - Project Engineer for 5 -story, 90,000 SF hotel • LAN Hangar, Miami, Florida - Project Engineer for 150,000 SF hanger for Boeing 777 maintenance and office space • Miami Marlins Ballpark, Miami, Florida - Project Engineer for 36,000 seat ballpark for the Miami Marlins • The Palace Assisted Living Facility, Coral Gables, Florida - Project Engineer for 9 -story, 246,000 SF assisted living facility and 8 -story, 565 car parking garage. • Almeria Townhouses, Coral Gables, Florida - Senior Project Engineer for four 4 -story townhouses. • Pompano Residence Inn, Pompano Beach, Florida - Project Engineer for 4 -story, 112 room hotel. • JetBlue Park, Fort Myers, Florida Project Engineer for 11,000 seat spring training ball park for Boston Red Sox baseball team. Resumes Sandra Hodge Duolic Information Offcer Sandra has over 19 years of experience in the areas of public relations, communications and marketing cultural affairs. Before joining the firm, Sandra was involved in public relations. Sandra's responsibilities included assisting in the coordination of major cultural events and political campaigns including securing media coverage (print and television). She has worked with the Miami Herald, Sun Sentinel, Miami Beach SunPost, Ocean Drive, Florida International Magazine, Vogue (Spanish), international magazines and local affiliates for CBS, NBC, ABC Fox, Telemundo and Univision. She is also experienced in conducting Socio -Cultural Effects evaluation in support of Planning and PD&E projects. 7rainings Training, FDOT, Public Involvement, 2012-2015 Training, In -House, Public Involvement, 2012 Training, In -House, Public Speaking, 2012 Training, In-house, Broward MPO, Environmental Justice, 2012 Training, In-house, FDOT Public Involvement, 2011 Training, PD&E, Process Overview, 2009 Stantec Select project experience • Miracle Mile and GiraldaAvenue Streetscape Improvements, Coral Gables, Florida - Public Involvement Manager during the design and construction of improvements to Miracle Mile (SW 24th Street) and GiraldaAvenue. The Miracle mile improvements begin at Douglas Road (SW 37th Avenue) on the east to LeJeune Road (SW 42nd Avenue) on the west. The Giralda Avenue improvements begin at Galiano Street on the east to Ponce de Leon Boulevard on the west. The project consist of drainage, lighting, irrigation and landscaping improvements, expansion of existing sidewalks, paver improvements, new street furniture, change of parking configuration from angled to parallel parking, milling and resurfacing, pavement marking and signage. Responsibilities during the design phase of the project included developing a Community Awareness Program for the City of Coral Gables and implementing a program that safeguards and informs the public of the construction impacts associated with the project and coordination with all businesses, merchants, residents, and public; a pre -construction public workshop to provide property owners and general public with an overview of the project; door to door visits to all business locations along Miracle Mile and Giralda Avenue. Responsibilities during the construction phase consist of full time public information support in addition to afterhours support for a construction hotline. • Districtwide Project Development and. Environment (PD&E) Consultant for FDOT District 4 Contracts No. 1 & 2 - Public Involvement Guidelines - Project Information Officer for the development of the District Four Public Involvement Guidelines. The Guidelines set District Four's procedures for complying with public involvement protocols in accordance with the FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual, Chapter 11. Efforts conducted include developing the guidelines and then maintaining and updating the guidelines with changes. The guidelines included sample documents such as: invitations, event checklist, save -the -date flyer, agenda, participant survey, newspaper ads, and others. • Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for the Widening of the Sawgrass Expressway from South of Sunrise Boulevard to South of US -441, Broward County, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise; SEIR (SWAT Project) - Project Information Officer for the preparation of a SEIR document for the widening of SR 869 also known as the Sawgrass Expressway from the junction of Interstate 75 (SR 93) just south of Sunrise Boulevard (SR 838) to South of US -441/ SR 7, a distance of approximately eighteen (18) miles in Broward County, Florida. The improvements under consideration will address capacity needs along the Sawgrass Expressway mainline through the incorporation of tolled express lanes in both the northbound and southbound directions and improvements at 8 interchanges. This project is using the FDOT Statewide Acceleration and Transformation (SWAT) process, which aims at streamlining the delivery of projects in Florida. • SW 10th Street Corridor Feasibility Study from the Sawgrass Expressway to I 95 in Broward County, FDOT District 4 - Public Involvement Coordinator for the development of a corridor feasibility study evaluating potential transportation improvements for a 3 mile corridor connecting two limited access facilities. Concepts considered included 1) No Build; 2) TSM; 3) At -grade expansion to a six -lane arterial; 4) Six -lane controlled access arterial with urban interchanges (SPUI's) at Military Trail and Powerline Road, and frontage roads; 5) Four -lane express roadway with urban interchanges (SPUI's) at Military Trail and Powerline Road and frontage roads; and 6) Transit alternative with a six -lane divided facility with a two-lane, two-way dedicated busway in the center. Improvements to the Sawgrass Expressway interchange with Florida's Turnpike Resumes Sandra Hodge Page 2 were also evaluated. Responsibilities involve coordination with local Elected Officials / Agencies for this PD&E study and supporting the PD&E Team for all Study Meetings, including coordinating with the Broward County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and their sub -committees: the Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) and the Community Involvement Roundtable (CIR). • Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study for SR 9/1-95 from South of SR 870 / Commercial Boulevard to north of Cypress Creek Road, FDOT District 4 - Public Involvement Officer for this study. The primary purpose of the PD&E Study is to evaluate improvements at the interchanges of I-95 and Commercial Boulevard and I-95 and Cypress Creek Road, which will reduce congestion, enhance safety, and achieve an acceptable level -of -service while minimizing potential impacts to the natural and human environments. The project is located in the second largest commercial district in Broward County known as the Fort Lauderdale Uptown District which includes the Cypress Creek Mobility Hub, which is home to a Tri -Rail Station, Tri -Rail shuttles and Broward County Transit bus service. In addition to the schedule public meetings, the Public Involvement Program will include several unscheduled meetings and presentations to local stakeholder groups (Envision Uptown and others) to present initial concepts and solicit public input while the alternatives are developed and refined. • Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study for the Widening of SR 80/ Southern Boulevard from Seminole Pratt -Whitney Road to Forest Hill Boulevard, FDOT District 4 (private developer funded) - Public Involvement Coordinator for the study of this four -mile corridor to include widening from 4- to 6 -lanes and upgrading to SIS, FIHS, and Access Management Standards. This corridor is one of two major east -west corridors within northern Palm Beach County. Responsibilities included coordinating several meetings with interested groups: Town of Loxahatchee Groves & the Loxahatchee Groves Landowners Association. • Safety Improvements at the Federal Highway & Poinciana Lane Intersection, Hobe Sound Public Hearing - This Public Hearing for an access modification in connection with proposed safety improvements at US -1 and Poinciana Way, Hobe Sound, FL was set up in accordance with the requirements stipulated in Senate Bill 1842. Responsibilities involve maintenance of the mass database, correspondence and news articles, maintenance and preparation for the Public Hearing (including site selection, notification letters, Fact Sheet, exhibits and legal/display advertisements (Stuart News & FAW). This project involves a 750 person database. • Forest Hill Blvd. 3R Improvements from Forest Court to South Dixie Highway, FDOT District 4 - Public Involvement Coordinator for the 3R improvements of this 0.687 -mile segment of Forest Hill Blvd. Improvements include resurfacing and widening to provide (4) 11 -ft lanes and an 11 -ft left turn lane at major intersections. There are various large trees, adjacent to the roadway that will be impacted. Some residents oppose the widening due to the impact to these trees. Pro -active and continuous coordination with the City of West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Parker Ridge Neighborhood Association and Southside Neighborhood Association is needed to ensure the widening concept is amenable to local agencies and residents. In addition to the preparation and maintenance of a Community Awareness Plan under a Public Involvement Level 3, responsibilities include development of the stakeholder database, coordination meetings with neighborhood associations, conduct a Public Informational Workshop (site selection, invitations, fact sheet, display graphics, etc.) and presentation to the West Palm Beach City Commission. • Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study to Widen the Homestead Extension of the Florida Turnpike (HEFT) from SR 836 to E. of NW 57 Ave, Turnpike Enterprise - Assisted with the evaluation of SCE issues for the PD&E Study of this 19 -mile section of the HEFT from SR 836 (Dolphin Expressway) to east of NW 57th Avenue. This existing limited access facility is being studied for possible conversion to eight general purpose lanes. This segment of the HEFT encompasses the System to System Interchanges of SR836 and I-75, as well as six Service Interchanges. • Historic Woodlawn Cemetery Ground Investigations Survey, City of Ft. Lauderdale, FDOT District 4 - Public Involvement Coordinator - A need for additional comprehensive surveying of the FDOT right-of-way (ROW) area between I-95 and the Woodlawn Cemetery boundary was determined during the PD&E Study which included a comprehensive public involvement program through Community Outreach Meetings, working closely with residents and agency stakeholders to determine if there were human remains within the ROW and work on I-95 didn't impact nearby historic North Woodlawn Cemetery. Stantec Resumes Elvira :refire, AIA, LEED AP Senior Architect Elvira has over 21 years of experience with public and private sector projects. She has served as project manager, project architect, job captain, and architectural designer for both large and small scale projects through the design development stage, construction documents, permitting, and construction administration. Her experience includes new construction, renovation to existing facilities, and interior design for commercial & corporate clients. Her governmental project experience has included several projects for various South Florida municipalities, working on parks and recreational facilities. Additionally, she has worked with Florida Department of Transportation and Florida International University as well as cities in Miami -Dade and Broward Counties. Education Bachelor of Arts in Architecture, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 1995 Registration Registered Architect #AR95213, State of Florida Board of Architecture & Interior Design LEED Accredited Professional, U.S. Green Building Council $tantec Select project experience • Miami Beach Restrooms & Concessions Facilities, Miami Beach, Florida - Project Manager for these facilities which designed these restroom and concession facilities in response to the Arts in Public Places Committees requirements' to expend funds at these locations. The firm was extremely proud to have been selected, to provide the design these much needed facilities. Each street head (6th, 21st, 29th, 35th, 46th, 53rd, and 64th) will act as location markers and be each visually distinctive from the other in order to promote way -finding along the beach as well as provide a level of whimsy to what has been traditionally a very dour program. • Lincoln Road, Miami Beach, Florida - Project Manager for the design of Lincoln Road to include the redesign of several existing fountains for focal points along the mall and pole mounted and landscaping lighting to add to the ambiance of the space. • Golden Beach Capital Improvements Plan, Town of Golden Beach, Florida - Architectural design Project Manager for the comprehensive Capital Improvements Master Plan focused on major improvements along State Road A1A (Ocean Boulevard). The master plan consisted of the design for a 4 lane divided road, improved public safety, traffic calming, streetscape improvements, sidewalks, lighting, landscape improvements and entry features into the town. • John F. Kennedy Causeway Improvements, North Bay Village, Florida - Architectural design Project Manager for the Master Plan and the redevelopment of the Causeway, the commercial corridor of the City. The project consisted of a master plan that encompassed the of a design for a 6 lane divided road, improved public safety, streetscape improvements, sidewalks, lighting, landscape improvements, a buffer wall for the Village's residents and entry features, which would provide a new image of the Village. • Miami Gardens Aesthetic Improvements, Miami Gardens, Florida - Project Manager in charge of the design for the purpose of dovetailing Miami Gardens Drive's aesthetic context with the current proposed mainline toll plaza reconstruction project. As part of the Turnpikes on-going mainline toll plaza's aesthetic concept; FTE's design for the plaza was developed with the idea of creating a gateway to Miami -Dade County as a whole, as well as to serve as a prominent focal point of the community for the City of Miami Gardens. The design of the overpass created the focal point and established a gateway at Miami Garden Drive's intersection with the Turnpike. • Crandon Boulevard Master Plan, Village of Key Biscayne, Florida - Architectural design Project Manager for this project that takes an existing suburban style highway and transforms it into a center of community activities. By promoting the safe and secure transit of all types of vehicles and pedestrians, this CPTED-friendly design also serves to create a source of identity for the community connecting retail, residential, public parks and government facilities into a cohesive design. The project consisted of a master plan that encompassed the design for a 4 -lane divided road, improved public safety, easing of traffic congestion, traffic calming, pedestrianization, improved mass transit, streetscape improvements, sidewalks, lighting, and a roundabout. This project, divided into three phases, will provide the Village with a reference for the traffic and public safety impacts of future development or redevelopment of properties fronting Crandon Boulevard and its side streets, Resumes Elvlra Frelre Page 2 • Florida Department of Transportation -District VI, North Dade Maintenance Facility (Phase I, II, III) - Project Architect for the Design/Build of FDOT District VI North Dade Maintenance Facility. The Project included full site development of an eight -acre parcel;12,000 s.f. office; eight -bay truck maintenance garage; 8,000 s.f. warehouse; miscellaneous outbuilding structures; truck wash facility and auto/truck parking. The total cost of the Project was 4.8 million. • Grapeland Aquatic Park, Miami, Florida - Project Manager in charge of the architectural design for a 10 -acre, $20 million urban park as part of the area renewal and airport improvement district. This project took an underutilized and poorly planned tournament complex and transformed it into a regional, needs -based park which includes a water theme park as well as a state-of-the-art baseball tournament complex. The needs for access and parking encroachment into the surrounding areas were identified as one of the principal complaints by the stakeholders as this program was developed. As such, the design of Grapeland Park, located adjacent to a densely populated urban neighborhood, is able to accommodate both multi- modal transportation access and all required parking. Employing the CPTED principles of clear way -finding, the design for this park allows users of these diverse programs to coexist within this limited site by sharing a clear and intuitive organization. • Gibson Park, Miami, Florida - Project Manager in charge of the architectural design for a 9 -acre, $10 million urban park as part of the area renewal and community redevelopment district. This Silver LEED Certified project consists of a 6,400 s.f. recreation center, 4,000 s.f. renovated community center, 15,000 s.f. basketball gymnasium, bowling alley, concession area, football and baseball fields and an aquatic center, all of which will be completed in two phases. The development of the park was carefully arranged to meet the program requirements while working within strict space limitations. Taking these limitations into consideration, the firm worked to develop footprints and a site layout that uses the space available in the most efficient manner. • Oakes Road Fire / Rescue Station, Davie, Florida - Assistant Project Manager for this 2 -story, 15,000 s.f station that is located on a 13 -acre site adjacent to SR -7. The project includes 3 large apparatus bays, offices, day room, kitchen, fitness room, and sleeping quarters for the Fire/Rescue personnel. This station is sited in the eastern/industrial part of town and the architecture of the building reflects a more industrial character. The 3 -story tower will serve as a beacon for the station and its surroundings. Construction cost is estimated at approximately $2 million. • Coral Springs Fire Academy, Coral Springs, Florida - Project Manager for a Feasibility Study for the Coral Springs Fire Academy on a 3.9 acre site adjacent to the City's Vehicle Maintenance and Public Works Center. The project includes 3 large apparatus training bays and 1 maintenance training bay; 4 training rooms seating 40 persons and 4 rooms seating 30 people; instructors' officers; library; computer lab, medical technical training facilities; locker/dressing rooms; toilets and other spaces. The gross area of the Training build will be approximately 30,000 s.fIn addition, there is to be a multi -story tower; burn pits' vehicle fire facilities; a combined police and fire two story rescue building and roadways with multiple fire hydrant connections. • Uleta Community Center, North Miami Beach, Florida - Project Architect for the redesign of a five -acre site. Elvira oversees the demolition of two existing structures and two new pools to be constructed into three phases. In order to satisfy the community's growing needs, the City of North Miami Beach enlisted Stantec to renovate the existing Recreation Center at Uleta Park. The existing building consisted of an outdated gymnasium and detached recreation center which was too small to accommodate all the necessary community programs. Stantec provided a master plan of the five -acre site to be built in phases. Phase 1 consisted of the interior renovation of the gymnasium and demolition of the existing recreation center. A new community center was designed that is attached to the existing gymnasium to provide a better connection between the buildings and provide one main entrance into the facility. Adjacent site improvements were also included in Phase 1 construction. • Shoppes at Sunset Place, South Miami, Florida - Project Manager for the architectural design to renovate the existing retail center. The project included the redesign of an existing 8,000 s.f. concrete plaza into a landscaped urban park as well as a new facade and entry plaza along Sunset Drive creating a new look for the retail center. • Chiller Plant Expansion, University Park Campus, Florida International University - Project Manager of the upgrade to increase the capacity of the Existing Central Chiller Plant. As part of this multi -phased project, the firm provided Architectural and Engineering services for the first two phases. The first phase entailed the replacement of two 1,500 ton chillers and a three -cell cooling tower. The second phase involves a 2,700 sq ft. expansion of the plant in order to house a new 1,500 ton chiller and an additional three -cell cooling tower. Stantec WINCiERTER C Agri P,.4n:Rf5t i!+: I'r:>ressAmid 1....rttinc.:rtFtg resdna Estabtss[ted 1949 Resumes ROBERT H. SCHULER, P.E., P.G. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Robert is Chief Structural Engineer and Professional Geologist and provides over thirty years of experience in the Structural Engineering and Construction Materials Testing and Inspections. His geotechnical experience includes subsurface investigations, soil laboratory management, preparation of design reports and construction specifications. Projects include high and low rise buildings, parking structures, bridge and highway structures, industrial facilities, marinas, residential development, municipal utilities, rock quarries and settlement investigations. Robert's job duties have included multiple capacity projects in areas from concrete testing and design to environmental reports including air quality and asbestos to subsurface and interface radar surveys. He is familiar with the inspection and design of various foundations including pile driving and auger cast pile installation, drilled shaft construction, foundation underpinning, controlled fill and earthwork operations as well as monitoring pile load tests. He is a designated Special Inspector in the State of Florida and maintains Professional Engineer Licenses in Florida, Kentucky, and Alaska and a Professional Geologist License in the State of Florida. EDUCATION Graduated in 1974 from Tufts University located in Medford, Massachusetts with a five year Combined Degree Program: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering (College of Engineering) and Bachelor of Science, Geology (College of Liberal Arts). Completed training in theory and practice of applying Subsurface Interface Radar technology in engineering and geophysical investigations. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Florida (PE 34715) Alaska, Kentucky, Maryland, Oklahoma and Virginia registrations are inactive. Florida Special (Threshold) Inspector - Special Inspector (No. 400) Professional Geologist - Florida (PG 1030) Asbestos Consultant - Florida (EA 14) Wingerter Laboratories, Inc. (2004 to date) Mr. Schuler joined the firm as Chief Engineer, following a consulting relationship spanning the previous ten years. In addition to management of field and laboratory operations, he is responsible for all reporting produced by the firm. Mr. Schuler brings his geophysical/ geotechnical consulting services and structural/threshold inspection services to the firm. RHS Technical Services, Inc. (1989 to 2004) Mr. Schuler founded the firm in February, 1989, initially specializing in asbestos and environmental consulting services as well as providing services in geotechnical and structural engineering. Since 1995, the firm has developed its specialties in structural engineering and geophysical/geotechnical consulting services. Since joining Wingerter Laboratories, Inc. in 2004, Mr. Schuler provides asbestos and environmental consulting services to the firm on a part-time, as needed basis. Mr. Schuler developed the structural design and shop drawings of a total of five four-story condo buildings (89 units total) for construction in Brazil. Design was in cold formed steel stud members prefabricated and shipped in containerized kits for erection and assembly with local labor. Walls are stucco finish. In 1992, RHS Technical Services, Inc. acquired a subsurface interface radar (SIR) system also known as a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) system. This system is capable of identifying reinforcing in concrete slabs with a high degree of accuracy and can locate deteriorated concrete or voids under slabs and pavement. Projects included the following: - North Terminal Expansion at Miami International Airport - LaGuardia International Airport runways and taxiways that extend over water - Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) & LaRomana (Dominican Republic) Airports - Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami -Dade County Stantec Resumes t 1NCrERTER P fg1.51undl L•mom:or:ng Icinng Eatabliahed 1949 Mr. Schuler managed Testwell Craig Laboratories of Florida, Inc. He opened the Miami office of the New York - New Jersey company and was in charge of all of its day-to-day operations. Major projects for Testwell Craig under Mr. Schuler's direction included: - Museum Tower, Miami, Florida. Responsible for all construction testing and inspection, including threshold inspection, for the twenty-nine story steel framed office building with a construction cost of $49 million. - Miami Bayside (Rouse Companies), Miami, Florida. Responsible for all construction testing and inspection, including threshold inspection, for the waterfront retail center with a construction cost of $90 million. EXPERIENCE Publix Supermarkets (Miami -Dade & Broward Counties) - New Publix Supermarket Store, Parking Garages and Retails Stores including Greenwise Stores in the tri -county area. All special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and some geotechnical drilling and engineering. Miami Beach Municipal Parking Garage, Miami Beach, FL - Served as Threshold and Geotechnical Engineer of Record for The CIty of Miami Beach New 7 Story Parking Garage. Oversaw all inspections, auger cast piles, load tests and construction materials testing for the project. 1450 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL - Oversaw all Construction Materials Testing and Welding Inspections on Miami -Dade County's first Gold LEED Hi -rise building which included condominium, parking garage and roadway. South Miami -Dade County Cultural Arts Center, Miami, FL - Oversaw all Construction Materials Testing, Welding and NDT Inspections on the perfroming arts complex building which included office areas, theater, parking garage and roadway. NDWWTP Phase 2 Environmental Assessment, North Miami, FL - Perform six monitoring well installations and eight SPT borings to water table at specified locations with the North Dade Waste Water Treatment Plant including boring layout & utility Coordination, grouting of holes, jetting and development of wells and obtaining of permits at specified locations and perform one MW repair at WWF -755 located at SW 72nd Street and SW 167th Avenue. stantec wINGI?RFER Established 1949 Resumes LEON C. CHIN -YOU, B. N Vice President / Material Testing Specialist / Inspector Over 20 years' experience in building construction including preparation of working blueprint drawings, full quantity take -offs and estimates of material and trade processes of residential and commercial buildings from subsurface to superstructure. Field work included on-site inspection for interim certificates, checks for conformity with engineers' specifications, Auger cast and driven pile inspections, threshold and special inspections, erection and inspection of structural steelwork including fabrication, post tensioning and reinforcing steel inspections, checking of levels for surveyors' approval, concrete strength and soil compaction testing, welding inspections, civil and structural construction engineering inspections of bridges, roadways, residential and commercial building structures, from substructure to superstructure, and basic knowledge of environmental remediation system installation, design, and inspection. EDUCATION 1984-1989 Titchfield High School, Port Antonio, Jamaica - Merit: Diploma 1989-1992 University of Technology (Formerly C.A.S.T.), Kingston, Jamaica Major: Quantity Surveying and Construction Technology - Merit: Diploma Employment History July 2009 - Present Wingerter Laboratories, Inc., North Miami, Florida Position: Vice President Duties: The complete supervision and management of all departments including Geotechnical, Inspections, Concrete, Soils/Aggregate and office administration. His responsibilities also include supervising all field and laboratory personnel, preparing reports, attending meetings, scheduling and prioritizing field and laboratory projects, maintenance of drilling equipment, and coordination of supplies and equipment. Oct. 1995 - July 2009 Wingerter Laboratories, Inc., North Miami, Florida Position: Materials Dept. Manager/ Senior Engineering Inspector / Drilling Supervisor Duties: Civil, structural and geotechnical engineering inspections for residential and commercial projects including, special, threshold and construction materials engineering inspections, pile driving and Auger cast pile installation, controlled fill and earthwork operations, ground improvement, and monitoring load tests. Projects include low and high rise buildings, parking structures, bridge and highway structures as well as industrial facilities, marinas, residential developments, and municipal utilities. He is also directly responsible for client contact, preparation of proposals, budget control and coordination of projects with architects, structural and project engineers, and construction contractors. His responsibilities also include supervising field personnel conducting structural inspections, pile installation inspections, roof inspections and testing, construction quality control inspections, coordinating work of field and office personnel, preparing reports, meeting deadlines, scheduling and prioritizing field and laboratory projects, maintenance of drilling equipment, and ordering of supplies. Serves as supervisor of drilling crews performing Geotechnical and environmental drilling operations and performs various laboratory tests of different construction materials and structural components to confirm strength parameters. CURRENT AFFILIATIONS - Jamaica Institute of Quantity Surveyors (J.I.Q.S.) - Member - American Concrete Institute (A,C.I.)- Concrete Field Testing Technician (Grade 1) - American Concrete Institute (A.C.I.)- Concrete Transportation - American Welding Society (A.W.S.) - Member - O. S. H. A. Certified Hazmat Supervisor - Parsons Brinkerhoff Certified F.E.M.A. Disaster Assessment Inspector - Troxler Electronic Laboratories - Nuclear Density Gauge Operation - Troxler Electronic Laboratories - Radiation Safety Officer - American Society of Civil Engineers (A.S.C.E.) - Affiliate Member Stantec Resumes stablished 1949 - Southern Building Code Congress International (SBCCI) Professional Member - State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation — Building Inspector # BN 00003292 - FDOT- Prestressed Concrete Training Course EXPERIENCE Various Public Supermarkets, Miami -Dade & Broward Counties, FL — Various New Publix Supermarket Store, Parking Garages and Retails Stores including Greenwise Stores in the tri -county area. Senior Specialist for all special and threshold inspections, construction materials testing and some geotechnical drilling and engineering. Multipurpose Parking Garage, Miami Beach, FL — Special Inspector and Coordinator for all aspects of construction material testing and geotechnical engineering of the City of Miami Beach's New Parking Garage. Auto Zone, Miami, FL — Special Threshold Inspector for this project for which Wingerter performed construction materials testing and inspections, geotechnical drilling and engineering and Special and threshold inspections. Walgreens Drug Stores, Miami Beach, FL — Special Threshold Inspector for this project for which Wingerter performed construction materials testing and inspections, geotechnical drilling and engineering and Special and threshold inspections. 1450 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL — Oversaw all construction material testing and welding inspections for this first Miami -Dade County Gold LEED hi -rise building which included condominium, parking garage and roadway. South Miami -Dade County Cultural Arts Center, Miami, FL — Oversaw all construction material testing and welding and NDT inspections for this performing arts complex building which included office areas, theater, parking garage and roadway. Chipotle, Sunrise, FL — Special Threshold Inspector for this project for which Wingerter performed construction materials testing and inspections, geotechnical drilling and engineering and Special and threshold inspections. Stantec ONGITUDE SURVEYORS EDLIARDO M. SUAREZ, PSM PRESIDENT / OWNER Resumes 1 Eduardo (Eddie) Suarez, PSM, has been in the Land Surveying profession in South Florida for the past 30 years. Eddie oversees the daily operation of Longitude Surveyors, LLC, and the preparation of a wide variety of projects and surveys with a diverse array of clients for both, the public and private sector. Mr. Suarez was the lead surveyor for the Environmental Compliance Division of the Solid Waste Department of Miami -Dade County for over 5 years. Since its inception, Longitude Surveyors has served as a Prime or sub -consultant for the following entities: City of Miramar, Village of Pinecrest, Miami -Dade County, City of Miami, City of Miami Beach, City of Coral Gables, Village of Key Biscayne, Village of Palmetto Bay, Town of Cutler Bay, City of Homestead, City of Doral, Miami Shores, North Miami, North Miami Beach and El Portal. Over that time he has gained the experience as both, a project manager and Principal in Charge. RELATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Altos Dei Mar Park on Collins Avenue (i61h & 75th Street), Miarnl Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a Boundary/Topographic/Tree Survey. Established location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), Erosion Control Line (ECL), Seasonal High Waterline (SHWL) and Mean High Water Line. Longitude located all above ground features and improvements including: pavements, sidewalks, paths, trees, visible above ground utilities, drainage structures (including rim elevations), etc, within the survey limits. Client Reference: Stantec, Sean Compel (305) 455-2900 Bus Shelter Program, Cutler Bay, PL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a Topographic Survey, for the construction of new bus shelters. LS determined location of all above ground features, including: trees, pavements, sidewalks, signs, poles, bus stops, utilities and any other above ground improvements within the survey limits. There were a total of (1 1) locations. Client Reference: Stantec, Sean Compel (305) 455-2900 Education. Miami Dade College Miami FL, Engineering Studies, A.S.1993 Professional Registrations: Professional Surveyor and Mapper: Honda LS6313 (2001) Professional Affiliations: Florida Surveying and Mapping Society Broward County Bus Stops, Weston, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a Control Survey. LS established set state plane coordinates for the control points for bus stop locations with GPS method. There were a total of (31) locations Client Reference: Premier Design Solutions, Inc., Gustavo Eckardt, P.E. (305) 962-9036 Eden House, 6700 Indian Creek Drive, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a Boundary Survey. Longitude established location of all buildings, pavements, sidewalks, light poles, fences, above ground utilities, drainage structures, manholes, median, signs, power poles, overhead wires, driveways, and all other significant above ground features within the survey limits. Client Reference: AP Management, Guido Gordillo (305) 924-7313 Stantec ONGITUDE SURVEYORS Resumes 2 Golden Sands Hotel, L'Atelier, 6901 Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, PL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed full 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanning Survey. Longitude performed a 3D terrestrial laser scanner and captured multiple scans to capture the entire ceiling of the lobby, LS used specialized software to create the cad file. Client Reference: GT McDonald Enterprises, Inc., Yeshua Leyva, LEED. (954) 584-3060 Monad Terrace, 1300 Monad Terrace, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a Boundary Survey. Established As -Built structure locations, structure gross floor areas, above ground utility information, septic systems, three (3) point elevations for each parcel, elevations taken and location of sea wall and elevation of sea wall cap. LS located underground utilities utilizing Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI). Client Reference: JDS Development Maynard Leon (646) 650-2102 Mt. Sinai Pump Station, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed Boundary and Topographic Survey. Longitude established right- of-way lines, subdivision lines, section lines, lot lines, base lines and easement lines as required by the project. LS established line data from the right-of-way maps and MDWASD and utility easement records. Set points of curvature and points' of tangency in the field. All improvements shown from Right of Way to Right of Way. Longitude established location of trees, rim, top and invert elevations of all existing sanitary sewers' manholes, pump wet and dry wells, sanitary sewer lines, drainage culverts, manholes and catch basins and grate elevations, diameter of the wet/dry well and valve vault dimensions. Location of project site perimeter, driveway and station service/staging area corners (including finished grade low and high points) with elevations. Client Reference: Pro Service Group, LLC., Julio Amoedo (305) 989-8044 South Pointe Drive from Collins Avenue to Ocean Drive, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a Topographic Survey, Longitude established existing grades of drainage structure information, pole locations, edge of pavement, curbing, trees, striping, and existing signs. Longitude established cross sections, Right -of -Way lines, invert and grate elevations for all project area(s) storm and catch basins. Client Reference: Chen Moore and Associates, Jose Acosta (786) 497-1500 The Carlton Hotel, 1433 Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed full 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanning Survey. Longitude performed a 3D terrestrial laser scanner and captured multiple scans to capture the entire ceiling of the lobby. LS used specialized software to create the cad file. Client Reference: GT McDonald Enterprises, Inc., Yeshua Leyva, LEED. (954) 584-3060 The Savoy Hotel, 425 Ocean Drive, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed an updated complete FDEP-compliant Survey. LS established location of Erosion Control Line (ECL), Seasonal High Water Line (SHWL) and Mean High Water Line (MHWL). The updated complete FDEP-compliant survey included required three transects and adhering to the "Topo-Survey Requirement Review Form". Client Reference: Premier Design Solutions, Inc., Gustavo Eckardt, P.E. (305) 962-9036 The Victor Hotel, 1144 Ocean Drive, Miami Beach, FL Principal in Charge, LS prepared and performed a specific purpose survey for the entrance of the Victor Hotel with elevations. Client Reference: Premier Design Solutions, Inc., Gustavo Eckardt, P.E. (305) 962-9036 Stantec LONGITUDESURVEYORS JOHN H. ADLER HI, PSM SURVEYOR & MAPPER Resumes 3 With 35 years of surveying experience in Florida, Mr. Adler has worked in the field, provided technical support and managed thousands of surveying projects. From 1989 to 2012 John acted as the Survey Department Head of Greenhorne & O'Mara Inc. (G&O) (now known as Stantec). John started at Longitude Surveyors LLC in 2013. Now in the capacity as a Senior Project Manager John manages all Sub -surface Utility Engineering (SUE) projects and provides Project Management and QA/QC for large scale transportation projects. RELATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE AS SENIOR SURVEYOR & MAPPER: Altos Del Mar Park on Collins Avenue (76th & 75th Street), Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed a Boundary/Topographic/Tree Survey. Established location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), Erosion Control Line (ECL), Seasonal High Water Line (SHWL) and Mean High Water Line. Longitude located all above ground features and improvements including: pavements, sidewalks, paths, trees, visible above ground utilities, drainage structures (including rim elevations), etc. within the survey limits. Client Reference: Stantec, Sean Compel (305) 455-2900 Bus Shelter Program, Cutler Bay, FL LS prepared and performed a Topographic Survey, for the construction of new bus shelters. LS determined location of all above ground features, including: trees, pavements, sidewalks, signs, poles, bus stops, utilities and any other above ground improvements within the survey limits. There were a total of (1 1) locations. Client Reference: Stantec, Sean Compel (305) 455-2900 Education: Palm Beach State College, Lake Worth, FL. Survey Technology, A.S. 1984 Professional Registration: Professional Surveyor and Mapper: Florida LS4693 (1989) Professional Affiliations: Florida Surveying and Mapping Broward County Bus Stops, Weston, FL LS prepared and performed a Control Survey. LS established set state plane coordinates for the control points for bus stop locations with GPS method. There were a total of (31) locations Client Reference: Premier Design Solutions, Inc., Gustavo Eckardt, P.E. (305) 962-9036 Eden House, 6700 Indian Creek Drive, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed a Boundary Survey. Longitude established location of all buildings, pavements, sidewalks, light poles, fences, above ground utilities, drainage structures, manholes, median, signs, power poles, overhead wires, driveways, and all other significant above ground features within the survey limits. Client Reference: AP Management, Guido Gordillo (305) 924-7313 Stantee L LONGITUDESURVEYORS Resumes Golden Sands Hotel, L 'Atelier, 6901 Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed full 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanning Survey. Longitude performed a 3D terrestrial laser scanner and captured multiple scans to capture the entire ceiling of the lobby. LS used specialized software to create the cad file. Client Reference: GT McDonald Enterprises, Inc., Yeshua Leyva, LEED. (954) 584-3060 Monad Terrace, 1300 Monad Terrace, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed a Boundary Survey. Established As -Built structure locations, structure gross floor areas, above ground utility information, septic systems, three (3) point elevations for each parcel, elevations taken and location of sea wall and elevation of sea wall cap. LS located underground utilities utilizing Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI). Client Reference: JDS Development Maynard Leon (646) 650-2102 Mt. Sinai Pump Station, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed Boundary and Topographic Survey. Longitude established right-of-way lines, subdivision lines, section lines, lot lines, base lines and easement lines as required by the project. LS established line data from the right-of-way maps and MDWASD and utility easement records. Set points of curvature and points of tangency in the field. All improvements shown from Right of Way to Right of Way. Longitude established location of trees, rim, top and invert elevations of all existing sanitary sewers' manholes, pump wet and dry wells, sanitary sewer lines, drainage culverts, manholes and catch basins and grate elevations, diameter of the wet/dry well and valve vault dimensions. Location of project site perimeter, driveway and station service/staging area corners (including finished grade low and high points) with elevations. Client Reference: Pro Service Group, LLC., Julio Amoedo (305) 989-8044 South Pointe Drive from Collins Avenue to Ocean Drive, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed a Topographic Survey. Longitude established existing grades of drainage structure information, pole locations, edge of pavement, curbing, trees, striping, and existing signs. Longitude established cross sections, Right -of -Way lines, invert and grate elevations for all project area (s) storm and catch basins. Client Reference: Chen Moore and Associates, Jose Acosta (786) 497- 1500 The Carlton Hotel, 1433 Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed full 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanning Survey. Longitude performed a 3D terrestrial laser scanner and captured multiple scans to capture the entire ceiling of the lobby. LS used specialized software to create the cad file. Client Reference: GT McDonald Enterprises, Inc., Yeshua Leyva, LEED. (954) 584-3060 The Savoy Hotel, 425 Ocean Drive, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed an updated complete FDEP-compliant Survey. LS established location of Erosion Control Line (ECL), Seasonal High Water Line (SHWL) and Mean High Water Line (MHWL). The updated complete FDEP-compliant survey included required three transects and adhering to the "Topo-Survey Requirement Review Form". Client Reference: Premier Design Solutions, Inc., Gustavo Eckardt, P.E. (305) 962-9036 The Victor Hotel, 1144 Ocean Drive, Miami Beach, FL LS prepared and performed a specific purpose survey for the entrance of the Victor Hotel with elevations. Client Reference: Premier Design Solutions, Inc., Gustavo Eckardt, P.E. (305) 962-9036 Stantec 2.3. Financial Capacity Please note that our company requested the Supplier Qualification Report from Dun & Bradstreet and it should have already been received by the City of Miami Beach. We stay true to local values, whether we're creating new communities or revitalizing old ones. Stantec Approach and Methodology CITY OF PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION nEi ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION ‘11, miAmi fIRMS 10 PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN. N.AS NEEDED" BASIS BEACH 2017 -028 -KB Stantec Approach and Methodology Introduction Stantec is pleased to submit this qualification package for your consideration in the selection of Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to provide various CEI services on "as needed" basis. The Stantec philosophy is to create and maintain a professional and attentive relationship with our clients, focusing equally on their needs as on their project's solutions. It is in the project solution that the Stantec philosophy of project execution is unique. From its founding, the Stantec philosophy is to fully integrate within its internal resources all of the disciplines and experience needed to achieve a holistic solution which maximizes value to the client. We make a commitment to our clients, from the very beginning of the relationship, to commit the time and talent of our principals and support staff; to be sensitive to the nuances and nature of their core business, and to deliver high quality service. The Construction Engineering and Inspection Team, as well as the entire Stantec team, is established utilizing the best available members from our in-house staff. The Stantec team is experienced and trained to perform quality construction engineering, inspections, value engineering, contract administration, contractor oversight, and public information services, as required. We have demonstrated this through projects completed for the City. Stantec has completed and is currently assisting Public Works and the Capital Improvements Projects Office with several projects in different stages of development. Completed projects include West 29th Street Bridge Repairs, La Gorce Canal Bridge Repairs, Fire Station No. 2 Punch List, South Pointe Park Water Feature Remediation Study, and South Pointe Phase 2 Claim Review. We are currently working on 53rd Street Restrooms, 6th Street Restrooms, Palm/Hibiscus Islands and Sunset Islands 3/4 Design Criteria Packages, and Flamingo Park. We are currently assisting in the construction of Sunset Islands 3 & 4, Stormwater Pump Station North of Convention Center, Convention Center CEI, Palm & Hibiscus Islands Improvements, Sunset Harbor Improvements, and 72" Drainage Pipe on Washington Avenue and 17th Street. The Stantec Team brings a wealth of CEI expertise on project -specific and miscellaneous / general assigned projects. The Stantec team also has a strong understanding of the processes and paperwork involved with this type of contract, a well -organized approach with an attention to detail and the City's needs, a pro -active, coordinated management plan, and the tools to be successful again and service the City of Miami Beach beyond their expectations. Implementation Plan The City of Miami Beach is seeking the services of qualified firms to provide general CEI support. Work assignments, under a task work order -type contract, may include project -specific teams, partial teams, individual field positions, or administrative support such as plans review, constructability reviews, construction schedule preparation, review, and analysis, claims analysis, and public information services. The Stantec team shall be ready to assign personnel within two weeks of notification. The City is seeking to partner with consultants that not only provide the minimum level of experience and certifications for the construction administration and inspection of these types of projects; but also those consultants that truly understand the overall construction process in order to streamline the projects with as little impact to the residents, businesses, and general public. The Stantec team is composed of a group of individuals with these capabilities and with the desire and intention to truly work with the City as an extension of their staff in delivering their projects to its constituents. The Stantec team brings to this partnership a team with extensive experience on similar contracts and numerous infrastructure projects throughout the state of Florida to make this happen. The various improvement projects in the City of Miami Beach that will likely require assistance involve scopes ranging from park and maintenance facilities to parking lots and right-of-way improvements. The right-of- way improvement projects include heavy roadway, drainage, and utility work which require careful contractor oversight. Our successfully completed projects for City of Miami Beach and in the Village of Key Biscayne, the Town of Golden Beach, and the Village of Pinecrest are very comparable in scope and size to the Miami Stantec Beach projects. In addition., these projects all involved coastal communities with generally high water tables, low elevations and tidal influences. These areas demonstrate similar neighborhood character and density and generally include well maintained and improved swales and driveways. The projects mentioned above took place in residential neighborhoods with very involved and concerned residents. Close communication and coordination is required with residents and business owners. Successful measures implemented by our team include conducting regular project meetings with stakeholders; weekly public meetings during construction where resident concerns can be addressed in a timely manner, separate from the regular progress meetings; and conducting detailed pre -construction assessments of damage to properties and structures with a special focus on the work zone. Photos and notes will document driveways, mailboxes, and landscaping in order to settle damage disputes. In addition to providing the actual CEI services in the field, the unique nature of a task work order -driven contract such as this one requires a well -organized, structured management plan and philosophy. The Stantec team understands that providing experienced and qualified personnel is only a portion of the services on this type of contract. Pro -active coordination and partnering with the City's Project Managers and within the Stantec team, communication, administration, budget tracking, planning, understanding of the billing method and process, and the use of proven management tools are all key components to success. The awareness of these issues and requirements, and a plan to appropriately address them either prior to, during, or after the issuance of a task work order, is what makes the Stantec team uniquely qualified to provide these services on this contract. Some of the key issues and philosophies that will be employed by the Stantec team on this contract, both technically and administratively, are discussed below. Staff Resources / Availability: As with all task work order -type CEI contracts, not only must the personnel assigned to the project be experienced, qualified, and certified for the particular type of construction, they must also be available in accordance with the time -frame of the project and the City's needs. The Stantec team assembled for this project possesses a vast amount of well-rounded resources for these purposes. In addition, these resources have all been specifically selected to ensure that a comprehensive representation of levels and areas of expertise of the personnel are available continuously throughout the duration of the contract. Although the hiring of new staff is always an option, the Stantec team has been structured to meet the needs of the City on this contract with the resources presented only. The effectiveness of this philosophy has been proven by the Stantec team having successfully provided miscellaneous and general assigned CEI services to many other public sector entities. Project Management/ Contract Administration: One of the challenges on a task work order -type CEI contract is on the administrative side. An attention to detail of the overall tracking and coordination of resources, both from a personnel and financial stand -point, is critical to ensuring that the City's staff is involved and informed of the status of the task work orders and the overall contract. The monthly submittal of status spreadsheets for all projects and personnel has proven to be effective in this capacity and has been utilized in successfully providing miscellaneous and general assigned CEI services to clients on previous assignments. An example of the task work order tracking Excel spreadsheet developed by Stantec for previous assignments is shown next and will be implemented on this contract. We build lasting relationships with clients and their communities. Stantec L-, 3 ?NCrcC_ vicar 2420 " Uwe (39 04 44324132 Oursno. {9 3305) 4 .'S05.--eMir-- 1315/ - ' {3659 itgfp0m 4 gr,1a -.fl �dif01111n+lrc:r; P6919en Arm .asve+'woe : 475 1 F. ,1061E Attalcareig Armada t 9 25.01711' 1 5 7. 470 a 9dIed 0 Dih r ram, n 220,, awr8 7 W�ux 51330 S c;dn.. Ca3 1 4,'093' I S 16125 1 2150.% 1 F 54 04.19 7 ' 0442017 3 v bnaa 004000 wbE 035 F.m.004E 3 1902047 9 Y :isms .-a...ma a.AE,' .00 FS,.Waif 4 46.96170'0 4136240 !1 •!R733 ,114411 3 49.9e 04444 rpreeme ?":4 705.54 40 1 74 74344 ` 5 1544415 S 4644 5A 3; Frvaonaw40 5. S F FMM1E i 1 $ t%99 1 7451401 11 7+2.91923001 S 349/791 t 111-- 24906_ 46604 3 ll.oev .4.sa a MP1✓f: 4 •,....100.41.C114• Jaw 000.00'410 0 35. m 01610 1 1 25 43930 1 1 30 39735 +'S 1 5 260 54 3 523=213 3 7 green s .wsi'0,0 XY 90 NAME ,039, I1 /1317{33511 0037562 5 43,011 5 32.7!7.,43 2 v leets Pe.sor.e':d6ff 0^,5 Pnw 109E It le 4.3 40 0 1 110 91 15 10.907 t0 5 +43a0.04 5 0 1 at 282 3,340 10 '0 '4730,1 : 2 .1 gnome easo..,'S333 x,9 =die aate 0312943 t r Arynnerta01- 029 i 20w1w4E I1 0,..,0.735 410140 11 1903.44 j 5 12.710.49 i9 11 475623 0 teat.) 14 371.2073 2 r „moo anon* 0335 1 Fore eqE .1 44 1+2320!7 3 4 dem 00-4, NOME.NOME 9':5 � 3 7:7 30 1 ".1 5185345 0 t.al090 904r72213 3 .7 Lamm. .: .,y4n15E+ . �+,,,WWIE •.n i f 1727094 Y 4102 'S 9042131} '4 u {eau. _axn MME: 447( fan Yam ::9 1 4677700 1 7.310.31 t0 On 17413 3 r yaw ...sm.NIS.E:975 Fele W1ME 13 36.54394 1 39021.90 5 11.04 9/'42013 2 r teaoo.a Names 445.9 ; 475 007 n•ME ) 1 ?4.'733 45 5 71 01120 1 4110.20 1 '4 1192013 3 gree P+Psme%MEI PTA , Fps IOW }3 467,3'71 2 46 e30 10 1 115: tap ,0 12003* 1 .7 '80en -' .55155m55 NAM 25.76 70tn41554E i6 7373401 3'2935 1 1,644-111 20 Its.^C'0 S 12 r rare. erenen,x'Y0a. 075 70*MM: 2810 I1 65909.63'.1 0204334 1 1.366451 21 22.2120• 40171 .0.1ren!VME 5 43.940 4413 x_'1462 S 7.1.121 43 , 1 620.4. 1 MR04 A 21,2044 1 22 124470'4 4 ' 4 game ?aravm4'aME - 415 iF Pew E hat* 3 71.'237448 r _ Aches r.,.x.f4'4933.; 0433 I F. 10434 5 `,3351719 '715357 5 0,15(291 40 '1=03014 1 w 'Jaw y.0,44,004.1E+4p6 I aa.t WAS 1 40 46135 1 5 a 87009 5 354 40 1 3 x'3:20,4 4 r , 40,0.0 eareeo83 e8Aie: oo4 ]lzan"ONE 11 t 4.322.2' 1 '44222 4 '+3 11/17,9, 1 •y"42044 4 o.,a 0441000051t.P' 035 1 =00.0011E {1 5.39'011 5)40.0 1 4.91' 27 9454.'043 ) '212102040 4333e 009,o,.. SAME 1 FOS inn NAME 11 3035031 1 5788'1045 7,4'7341 76422+13 1 1.33x'9 7: 20 '22433,5 4 i'Y4!15 ga.w eam sa440451E' 449 I}} Fmn.l1310 11 373024011 25 1/1442013 7 Sato i0 %Dovey, sass004E 005 fat NAME 13 7241311, 5 a13,I1, 6010 • Denotes Funds rn 34 O.cmnnmW9 C:..,SE1_ 44C,Ie,,$ Contract Oran[ 0 1 500.000:70 Casa- Egnrn 30042017 TMa39I 3 1 054 160.0 Totals _ 031 110.20 ends Oa ume:ad. '.6 40'5750 Flags Scheduled to Be 04cmaated 1 1 129.20.27 -+ C....rt A,0.01. Fund, t 516944.90 00E F1nala+ Penalwgn M Coot -cat 9 143.161.51' 1 139:5%11 ` 950 9341 In addition to the status tracking sheet, all paperwork and forms required to execute task work orders have been standardized in Excel and/or Word formats. These management tools, which will be tailored to this contract at the beginning of the project, are utilized to streamline the administrative process for each task work order and ensure that the required personnel and resources are placed on the projects when they are needed by the City within a maximum of two weeks from request, or sooner, as specified within the scope of services. Monthly progress meetings with City staff will be conducted to review the current and projected personnel needs, as well as the status of the contract. The Stantec team will also conduct monthly team status meetings to update the available resource status and set forth a strategic plan to accommodate the City's needs. The philosophy behind the project management plan for this contract is simple. Bottom Line: The City is looking for a team to provide CEI support services and be an extension of their staff, not to create additional work for them. The ideology and management tools to be employed by the Stantec team will accomplish just that. Approach to Project We have identified and discussed some of the key and/ or unique issues for this contract herein, however, having a proven, well -organized plan of attack that combines the efficient use of resources along with the sensitivity to the City's needs is the key to success. Technical & Management Approach Stantec' team approach to any project, regardless of size, has always been to deliver quality service beyond the expectations of our clients. We fully understand that integrating our CEI team members, the City's staff, and our stakeholders into one focused group with common goals and objectives is how projects are successfully completed. For each individual task work order, and the contract in general, we emphasize the following factors for success: 1. An understanding of and sensitivity to the City's goals and the required tasks to be performed; 2. A Team Approach. The Stantec team considers itself an extension of the City's staff and a Consultant "TEAM" in the truest sense. We intend to continue its partnership with the City and all the Sub - Consultants to develop technical and staffing solutions which will benefit all stakeholders; Stanfec 3. A pro -active public involvement philosophy as dictated by the specific assignment, but at all times with the stakeholders in mind; 4. A skilled and responsible project management approach which identifies potential construction issues and quickly develops and implements procedures to resolve these issues; 5. Detailed Project/ Contract Status Reports for use by the City and the Stantec team members; 6. Continuous open communication and coordination with all Stantec team members and the City, including monthly progress and team status meetings; 7. Adherence to our Quality Assurance / Quality Control program, and 8. Strict adherence to Schedules and Budgets. These critical success factors will be applied during the entire life of this contract. The responsibility for execution of the task work orders assigned under this contract is given to the Stantec team Project Manager Sean Compel, PE, LEED AP, who has over 15 years of experience in design and construction administration for large scale projects in various municipalities, and Ramon Castella, PE, LEED AP, as Principal in Charge who brings more than 32 years of experience to the team. Together they will be responsible for the following functions: 1. Overall coordination of the team and administration of the contract including monthly progress meetings with the City staff to identify current and future needs as well as the contract / budget status; monthly team status meetings to review available resources of the team members and to update the team personnel matrix; processing and submittal of administrative paperwork (task work orders, action requests, work effort spreadsheets, and personnel approvals, etc.), and oversight of all financial / billing processes and submittals; 2. Assigning task work orders to the Stantec Project Task Managers and personnel, and coordinating pre - construction activities at the start of each task work order ensuring that the project documentation for each task work order, regardless of the assigned personnel, is submitted in accordance with or better than the City's expectations; 3. Ensuring that all documentation produced is technically sound and meets the standards and specifications; 4. Providing a one point of contact in maintaining a clear line of communication with the City, other agencies, all stakeholders, and our Stantec team members at all times; and 5. Ensuring that the project files are properly documented (copies of originals of all correspondence, e-mails, meeting minutes, project decisions, calculations, etc.) and electronically distributed to the City as required, through the use of the City's e-BuilderTM. Risk Mitigation Strategies Quality Assurance/ Control Process (QA/QC): Stantec is committed to a pro -active QA/QC process. An engineering/ architectural firm that provides high quality service will realize continued contracts from its clients. The essence of ensuring quality service is through the establishment of an effective and on-going QA/QC program. Our QA/QC process includes a comprehensive, well defined review of the project scope, specific roles for each team member, identification of specific QA/QC activities, scheduled tasks, and detailed procedures for ensuring that the services provided meet or exceed the expectations of the client. The Stantec project manager (PM) then prepares the checklists that are tailored for each task work order. These checklists, based on the FDOT CPAM and District I/A checklists, and other applicable publications, are utilized during the task work order assignment. During the task work order assignment, the PM is responsible for scheduling critical point reviews. At Stantec, every level of staff understands that QC begins with them. Our approach to each task is that "we are the last line of defense". We don't depend on others for corrections. However, the QA/QC process is built-in to ensure that the services we provide are of the highest quality. Our QA/QC program has resulted in the firm consistently obtaining high grades and repeat work from our clients. Stantec Control of Project Budget: As part of Stantec team's project cost control system, during the preparation of a task work order, the PM prepares a budget form which identifies all project related costs. The budget outlines assigned personnel, associated manpower and monetary allowances, equipment and direct expenses, overhead, and Federal Contract Compliance Manual (FCCM). The contract fee is broken down into categories which are identifiable with activities/items and sub -consultant services. This format is then translated to our accounting system and reflected in our progress reporting supplied to our clients and is summarized in the task work order tracking spreadsheet, which is reviewed at each monthly progress meeting with City staff. This allows us to closely track where the contract is financially at any point in time. Schedule Control Stantec's process is structured with particular attention to the schedule and cost control, cost estimates, and time management to guarantee the budget and time allocation for each project performed regardless of the type of project. As part of our control we look at every aspect of a project that may develop into a delay and eliminate it up front with a proactive approach to reduce the overall time involved in what others may consider to be "unforeseen conditions". This includes developing a strong due diligence program in the initial phase of the project. Many of the obstacles that result in time delays revolve around improper or inadequate due diligence with regard to doing your homework including proper project property delineation, historical document review, utility locates and clearances, proper code and design criteria and adequate permit handling. Project Staff The Stantec team is committed to providing the highest quality star and service for this contract. Our top people will work on task work orders assigned under this contract. The expertise at the management, project, and QA/QC level of the team enhances our experienced staff and provides the necessary commitment to see any and all of the task work orders assigned, successfully completed. Our proposed staff is highly experienced in the construction administration and inspection of the full realm of transportation projects. Stantec TA3 3 • • ouch and Methodol Comprehensive Project Team Resources and Availability: Each member of the Stantec team was specifically selected for this project and is comprised of highly technical and experienced professionals ranging from registered senior project engineers and registered project architects to a support staff of senior inspectors, junior inspectors, licensed surveyors, licensed geotechnical engineers and public information officers. Included in the above resources are individuals that are significantly experienced in claims review and analysis, constructability and biddability plans review, construction schedule preparation, review and analysis, and final estimates support. These resources are significant enough and have been structured such that all levels and areas of expertise of personnel will be available throughout the entire duration of the contract. Outstanding Project Management: Stantec's commitment to this contract can be seen with the assignment of Sean Compel, PE, LEED AP as the Project Manager/Contract Administrator and Ramon Castella, PE, LEED AP as Principal in Charge. Sean has over 15 years of experience in the design and construction of various municipal projects. Ramon, who will provide the corporate sponsorship to ensure the highest level of service on the contract, also has more than 32 years of experience in the planning, design, and construction of complex engineering assignments. Principal/ Vice President, Jeff Crews, PE, LEED AP will serve as the QA/QC Officer. Jeff has over 29 years of experience in the management and administration of engineering divisions responsible for all aspects of design and construction of government and agency related facilities including urban and interstate roadways and bridges and utility corridors throughout Florida. The project manager will meet with each project task manager on a quarterly basis to review their current staffing, any changes that may have occurred since the last meeting, and identify staffing solutions that may be beneficial to the City. Not only does this potentially provide staffing solutions to the City in advance, at a minimum it puts the Stantec team in position to provide required staff even before requested. Again, too many times this type of contract is looked at as reactionary. The Stantec team will manage the contract in a pro -active fashion in order to ensure experienced and appropriate staff is provided to the City when it is needed. Qualifications / Availability: The significant personnel presented in the attached organization chart is an aggressive plan designed to provide both the quality and quantity of resources, spanning all levels and areas of expertise, that is necessary to ensure that this contract is serviced in accordance with, or better than, the City's expectations. It is our understanding that the proposed contract is for two (2) years with the potential to be extended in one-year increments up to a maximum of two years. Due to the vast resources at Stantec, we were unable to present the detailed credentials of the entire firm. While these individuals are the backbone of the Stantec team, we chose to focus on those key personnel shown on the organization chart. These key individuals are ready to service this contract. Resumes for any additional resources can be provided as necessary for each task / assignment should the Stantec team be successful in the award of this contract. Other Considerations Our commitment to the City can be seen through our continuous presence in South Florida. We routinely exceed our client's expectations of time and budget and have assembled a team and established the tools to continue this success. In addition to the team discussed herein, there are several additional factors that make the Stantec team a good choice for this assignment. There is an old saying that goes, "well-done is better than well -said". Our continued success is the result of an established plan, the use of proven management tools, but most of all the understanding, consideration, and satisfaction of the City's goals and needs. As such, in addition to the understanding of the scope, approach to the unique challenges of a task work order -type contract and the experienced staff proposed, as presented herein, we have established a detailed resource management plan for this contract. Resource Management Plan: The effective management of the vast amount of resources of the Stantec team is the key to the success on this Stantec contract. A well -organized, strategic plan has been developed in order to accomplish this, which incorporates the concepts of detailed planning and the involvement of the City's star in a partnership that ensures that their needs are met, or exceeded. In order to ensure the continuity of available personnel and to potentially respond to multiple task work order requests from the City in a timely manner, we have started with a core group of professionals chosen specifically for the Stantec team on this contract, with additional available resources of 140 staff. As depicted in the organization chart, multiple position levels / areas of expertise are available throughout the maximum duration of the contract. The Stantec team does not intend to be merely reactionary to the needs of the City on this contract, but continue a partnership with the City in order to facilitate efficient, cost-effective, and timely resource allocation. On a quarterly basis, the PM will conduct a team status meeting with the Stantec team project task managers in order to review staff availability including new hires and personnel that are up for reassignment. Between the Stantec team status meeting, a monthly progress meeting with the City staff will be conducted. In addition to discussing the financial status of the contract and any other issues at that time, the City's short and long-term needs and work plan, as well as, the Stantec team's updated personnel matrix will be reviewed. The needs of the City, the status of the contract, and the disposition of the Stantec team's resources are evaluated simultaneously, thus not only creating the ability to satisfy all the needs, but potentially assisting the City in establishing them and their solutions. Lastly, and one of the key success factors to the resource management plan, is the protocol for the actual assignment of resources that has been adopted by the Stantec team. Once the needs of the City, either time - sensitive or long-term, have been developed and established in the monthly progress meeting, the most qualified, available personnel will be selected for the assignments, providing the most benefit to the City, and all stakeholders. The Stantec team has been formed with a true "TEAM" concept with no pre -determined allotment of revenue among its members. We have designed the resource plan to ensure availability and versatility of personnel throughout the maximum duration of the contract and those resources will be provided to the City in a manner that best services their needs, regardless of which Stantec team member employs them. We appreciate this opportunity to express the interest of our team in working with the City of Miami Beach on this contract and look forward to a continued relationship with the City. ii\rs, Strong, long-lasting relationships directly impact the success of our employees, clients, projects, and communities. Stantec 5 Stantec ATTACHMENT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX E MIAMI BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017 -028 -KB el MIAMIBEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements" of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 each occurrence - owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability - $ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty (30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. R =Q 2017 -028 -KB