Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agreement with Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.
o i 7 ?F'/ AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-29881 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 12 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 13 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 14 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 14 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 15 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 16 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 16 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 16 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 18 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 18 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 19 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 19 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 19 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 20 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 23 SCHEDULE A - 1 30 SCHEDULE B 31 SCHEDULE C 32 SCHEDULED 33 SCHEDULE E 34 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 35 ATTACHMENT B 43 ATTACHMENT C 44 2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation having its principal office at 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017 -028 -KB for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services On An "As -Needed -Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide various CEI services to the City on an "as needed" basis; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2017, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017-29881, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. 3 BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final signed and sealed (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 and 4 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the architect/engineer who has entered into a contract with the City to provide the Services described under this Agreement. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed engineer in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to 4 perform CEI services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "E", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A-1 attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), the Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a Project, and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements stipulated in such Consultant Service Order. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Request for Qualifications (RFQ), Design Criteria Package (if any). CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design -builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance - oriented drawings or specifications of a design -build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design -build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design -build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design -build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been 5 reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub -contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project, Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: 6 Schedule A Schedule A-1 — Schedule B — Schedule C — Schedule D — Schedule E — Scope of Services Consultant Service Order Consultant Compensation Consultant Hourly Billing Rate Schedule Insurance Requirements and Sworn Affidavits Approved Subconsultants SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants' and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. 7 Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. Consultant further represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall be accurate, coordinated and adequate for construction in accordance with applicable industry standards that govern the practice of engineering and shall comply with applicable City Codes, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services to be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate 9 records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. Notwithstanding this Section 2.5, the Consultant Service Order issued by the City to Consultant shall specifically delineate and describe the Services to be provided by Consultant for the particular Project (that is the subject of such Order). 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any inspection errors or omissions. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence, except due to Force Majeure as defined herein, in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 4 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting 8 concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. Neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant and its Subconsultants shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or its Subconsultants to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant or any Subconsultants' misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of Services by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such Services, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's Services. 2,11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at, its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design 9 professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked -up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant 10 Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and 11 professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the 12 City Commission shall be the body to consider, comMent upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 13 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant fbllowing receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. [Intentionally Omittedl 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re -bidding, or re -negotiating contracts. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. , ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). 14 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 15 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"}), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re -use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 16 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the 17 Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies except for the professional liability and workers compensation/employers liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the 18 Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager 19 With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 Attn: Mohamed Mabrouk, PE All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami -Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 20 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 [Intentionally Omitted.' 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 21 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest , J CITY OF MI MI EACH: ANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. Signature/Secretar O)3VA Print Name Date. APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION )I 3)J 22 Date. SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall provide professional engineering services on an "as needed basis" to provide Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services pursuant to the Agreement. Each firm awarded a contract hereby agrees to be placed on a list of professionals that will provide CEI services where the City may call upon them to perform professional services for certain City projects, (the Project or Projects), as assigned by the City, in its sole discretion and judgment. As the need for service arises, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. Professional services will be quoted as a not to exceed or lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete a project and in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "0" of this Agreement. The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order; the Consultant shall sign it and return it to the City for execution by the City Manager or his/her designee. The Consultant's Basic Services that may be provided under this Agreement shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services - Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. The following services shall be performed: a) General Coordination: The Consultant shall communicate daily or periodically with the City, the Design Consultant and Contractor, as needed. They shall report on concerns as it relates to the construction effort and activities. In addition, the Consultant shall also coordinate with the Public Information Officer (P10) where notifications such as utility outages, road closures, etc. may be required. The Consultant shall monitor and verify that the Contractor has made the required notifications to the utility owners, residents and businesses as may be required. b) Estimating Services: Provide accurate cost estimates and schedules to avoid cost overruns and schedule slips. Prepare cost estimates and schedules by helping manage resources and supporting assessment and decision making. Services may encompass a wide range of cost - related aspects of engineering and program management, but in particular cost estimating, cost analysis/cost assessment, design -to -cost, schedule analysis/planning and risk assessment. c) Value Engineering Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, and provide cost estimating information at Value Engineering meetings between the City, the Design Consultant, and the Contractor for the Project. d) Resident's Information Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, address residents' concerns, participate, produce meeting minutes, and take a lead role in Resident Information Meetings with the City for the Project. e) Pre -Construction Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, 23 produce meeting minutes and take a lead role in Pre -Construction Meeting with the City, Design Consultant and Contractor for the Project. The Pre -construction Meeting shall be scheduled once the City issues the first Notice -to -Proceed to the Contractor. f) Weekly Construction Progress Meetings: The Consultant shall attend, participate and take a lead role in weekly construction project meetings with the City, PIO, Design Consultant and Contractor on the Project. These meetings shall serve as forums to review the status of construction progress, discuss construction issues, discuss schedule and/or cost concerns, discuss potential changes or conflicts, review the status of shop drawing submittals and Construction Document clarifications and interpretations, and to resolve problems before they become critical. Consultant shall prepare weekly meeting minutes and distribute to all meeting attendees, review the two week look ahead provided by the Contractor and provide comments or objections to written statements within the specified timeframe. The Consultant shall prepare detailed weekly reports that describe the construction activities, progress, incidents and issues that have occurred on the construction site and distribute to the attendees in advance of the weekly construction progress meetings. g) Field Observations: The Consultant shall conduct field observations on a daily basis throughout the duration of construction. Field observations may be provided jointly by the City and the Consultant. If and when necessary, the City shall provide part-time construction inspectors for the duration of the Project. The role of the City's construction inspectors shall be limited. The Consultant shall be present at the construction site daily during the construction phase of the Project and shall be expected to be available, as needed, throughout the Contractor's work day. h) Stormwater Permit - Verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections, preparing reports and monitoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For each project that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit, inspector the inspector (at least one) should have successfully completed the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors". The Consultant's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 57, No. 187, Friday, September 5, 1992, pages 4412 to 4435 "Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites" and the City's guidelines. i) Specialty Design Consultant Site Visits: The Consultant shall monitor the number of specialty site visits requested by the Contractor or City and conducted by the Design Consultant. When it becomes evident that a specialty site visit from the design Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be required, the Consultant shall notify the EOR to discuss and schedule a mutually acceptable time for meeting at the construction site. Daily Reports: The Consultant shall prepare daily reports, on the same date as construction occurs, to record the daily performance of the Contractor as well as other significant construction related matters. Daily reports shall be uploaded by the Consultant to e-BuilderTM the City's document management system. At the end of each day or the beginning of the following day, the Consultant shall forward the original daily reports to the City for review. The Consultant shall maintain and file paper copies of the daily reports onsite for reference. The daily reports shall include records of when the Contractor is on the job -site, general field observations, weather conditions, change orders, changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily drilling and testing activities, testing results, testing observations, and records of the outcome of tests and inspections. At a minimum the daily reports shall contain the following information: j) 24 • Weather and general site conditions • Contractor's work force counts by category and hours worked • Description of Work performed including location • Equipment utilized • Names of visitors to the jobsite and reason for the visit • Tests made and results • Construction difficulties encountered and remedial measures taken • Significant delays encountered and apparent reasons why • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and City • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and residents • Summary of additional directions that may have been given to the Contractor • Detailed record of materials, equipment and labor used in connection with extra work, or where there is reason to suspect that a claim or request for Change Order may be submitted by the Contractor • Summary of any substantive discussions held with the Contractor and/or City • Summary of nonconforming work referenced to corresponding Non -Compliance Notice • A log of photographs taken k) Photographic Record: Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overall progress of construction, beginning with preconstruction documentation, following with on- going construction documentation, and ending with post -construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshot type taken to define the progress of the project and shall be filed electronically by month in e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system, labeled by date, time and location. The Consultant shall upload all photos to the e-BuilderTM document management system on a weekly basis. Adherence to Construction Documents: The Consultant shall review materials and workmanship of the projects and report to the City any deviations from the Construction Documents that may come to the Consultant's attention. Consultant shall determine the acceptability of the work and materials and, in concert with the Design Consultant (as necessary), make recommendations to the City to reject items not meeting the requirements of the Construction Documents. m) Delivery of Unaccepted Materials to Jobsite: As new materials are delivered to the jobsite, the Consultant shall check the material's certifications and samples and verify that an approved shop drawing was submitted for the material in question. If it is determined that a submittal has not been approved, the Consultant shall immediately notify the City and issue a Non -Compliance Notice. In conjunction with the Design Consultant (as necessary), the Consultant shall direct and supervise the sampling and testing of materials to be performed by the City's independent testing laboratory. The Consultant shall maintain test report logs which shall be submitted to the City for review on a monthly basis and uploaded to e- BuilderTM, the City's document management system on a weekly basis. Consultant shall also review invoices submitted by the independent testing laboratories and recommend payment by the City. n) Shop Drawing Submittals: The Consultant shall review shop drawing and product approvals throughout the duration of the construction period for familiarity prior to delivery of materials. Consultant shall verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log, conducting timely submittals, and uploading approved shop drawings to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. o) Issuance of Non-compliance Notices: The Consultant shall be responsible for notifying the City when they become aware of a condition that is believed to be in non-compliance with 25 p) q) Construction Documents. Anytime the Consultant notices a potential construction problem or a condition that could result in non -complying materials, equipment or workmanship, the Consultant will need to determine whether the condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety. 1) If a condition does not pose a threat to public health or safety, immediate verbal notification or "Pre -Noncompliance Notice" of the potential non-compliance should be made to the Contractor and the City. This verbal notice shall be documented in the Consultant's daily report, as well as an e-mail to the contractor with a copy to the City's Project Administrator advising the Contractor of potential construction problems, errors, or deficiencies that can be promptly resolved and do not warrant a Non-compliance Notice. If the Contractor fails to respond to the verbal notification within a reasonable timeframe, the Consultant shall notify the City and the City's Projects Administrator and shall issue a written Non-compliance Notice. 2) If a condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety, the Consultant shall notify the Contractor and City immediately and the City's Projects Administrator shall issue a Non-compliance Notice to the Contractor. Non-compliance Notices shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements, along with a required timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor. Other items that should be included in the Notice include a reference to the provision of the Construction Documents that has been violated. Damage to Existing Facilities: The Consultant shall identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has notified the respective owner(s). The Consultant shall include record of such occurrences in the daily reports. Change Orders: Consultant shall perform an independent review of any Change Orders submitted by the Contractor and provide a written statement noting recommendation for approval or denial of the Change Order to the City. If recommended for approval, the .Consultant shall note if the requested cost and schedule impacts are fair and reasonable. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining a Change Order log and uploading approved Change Orders to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. The Consultant shall also participate in change request review meetings with City and Contractor to resolve and/or negotiate the equitable resolution of request. r) Requests for Information/Construction Document Clarification (RFIs/CDCs): When RFIs and CDCs involve design issue interpretations, the Consultant shall coordinate with the Design Consultant, as needed, to resolve the Contractor's Requests for Information, Construction Document Clarifications, Field Orders, and other related correspondence. The Consultant shall be also be responsible for verifying that the Design Consultant is providing a written response to RFIs and CDCs in a timely manner and for processing, logging, and distributing all RFIs/CDCs. Consultant shall upload all RFI and CDC responses to e-BuilderTM the City's document management system. s) Schedule: Analyze the Contractor's schedule(s) (i.e, baseline(s), revised baseline(s), updates, as -built, etc.) for compliance with the contract documents. ..Elements including, but not limited to, completeness, logic, durations, activity, flow, milestone dates, concurrency, resource allotment, and delays shall be reviewed. Verify the schedule conforms with the construction phasing and MOT sequences, including all contract modifications. Provide a written review of the schedule identifying significant omissions, improbable or unreasonable activity durations, errors in logic, and any other concerns as detailed in the contract documents. 26 t) Pay Requisitions: Consultant shall verify Contractor's pay requisition quantities and sign -off on all pay requisition quantities in the field. Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing with the Contractor the monthly payment requisition to confirm the status of completed and uncompleted work and stored materials. The Consultant shall advise the City of quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only be approved by the City. u) Equipment Tests and Systems Start-up: Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating various tests for quality control on the projects; verifying that equipment tests and systems start-up are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel; and that the Contractor is maintaining adequate records thereof. Consultant shall observe, record, and report appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-up. v) Record Drawings: Consultant shall monitor that record drawing mark-ups are properly maintained by the Contractor. The Consultant shall review the record drawing mark-ups as deemed necessary by the City. Contractor's failure to maintain the record drawings in up-to- date condition may be deemed grounds for withholding Contractor's monthly payment requisitions until such time as the record drawings are brought up-to-date. The Consultant shall notify the City if it considers the mark-up documents insufficient. The City shall make final determination of payment withholding. w) Safety: Consultants shall be expected to recognize a hazard that any reasonable non -safety professional might be expected to recognize. In addition, those safety obligations extend only to recognizable hazards that the Consultant may note while in the normal conduct of onsite business. If a situation presents itself, the following procedures should be followed: • Immediately direct personnel to remove themselves from the apparent danger. • Notify the Contractor's superintendent of the apparent condition that caused the concern and that the affected personnel were directed to remove themselves accordingly. • Notify the Contractor of the situation that arises concern, both in writing and verbally. • Issue a written Notice of Noncompliance stating that the Contractor should take immediate action as it deems necessary to correct the deficiency / condition. • Write a full report in the Daily Report on the condition found to be unsafe, all actions taken, and correspondence written, including times and names. • Take photographs, of the concern. • If the Contractor does not make corrections, the Consultant should notify the City. • The Consultant shall review the situation with the City for further direction. • The condition, as well as all conversations and correspondence, shall be recorded in the Consultant's Daily Report. • In the case of a construction -related accident, Consultant shall notify the City of the accident. Consultant shall direct the Contractor to prepare an accident report with a copy forwarded to the City. x) Quality Control: The Consultant shall review and monitor the Contractor's adherence to an acceptable quality control program submitted by the Contractor prior to the issuance of the second Notice -to -Proceed by the City. This program shall describe the Contractor's quality control, organizational procedures, documentation controls and processes for each phase of the work. Quality control during construction shall be the responsibility of the Contractor; however, oversight and ensuring the Contractor complies with applicable jurisdictional construction standards shall be enforced on the City's behalf by the Consultant. 27 y) Proceeding with Disputed Work: In the event that an agreement cannot be reached on a Change Order, the Contractor must carry on the work and adhere to the project schedule in accordance with the construction contract general conditions. The Consultant shall log all forced work efforts related to disputed change order on a Forced Work Daily Log Reports which shall be signed and dated by the Consultant and the Contractor's representative at the completion of each workday. The Consultant shall forward copies of this form to the City for record purposes. z) Maintenance of Traffic (MOT): The Contractor shall provide the Consultant, City and Design Consultant with approved copies of its MOT at the Pre -Construction Meeting for general information purposes. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to verify compliance with the MOT in the field. aa) Contractor Request for Services: When the Contractor requires services from the City for issues such as water main shutdowns, tie-ins to existing water mains, special regulatory inspections, etc., a request shall be made in writing by the Contractor, and forwarded by the Consultant to the City, a minimum of three working days prior to when required. bb) Substantial Completion: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Substantial Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the substantial completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a substantial completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the substantial completion "walk-through", perform a substantial completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City, and prepare a master punch list that describes items remaining to be completed. This master punch list shall be attached to the certificate of substantial completion. cc) Final Completion and Project Closeout: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Final Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the Final Completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a Final Completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the Final Completion "walk-through" and perform a Final Completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City. If the work is determined to be incomplete, Consultant and other attendees shall each develop a punch list of items requiring completion or correction prior to consideration of final acceptance of each project which shall be forwarded to the Contractor by the Consultant for the Project. Consultant shall complete all necessary close-out and construction completion forms and documentation in coordination with the City for the Project. The Consultant shall work with the Design Consultant and the Contractor, as necessary to ascertain materials required for the closeout binder, as required by the City, and review the Operation and Maintenance manuals for each proJect for completeness prior to forwarding documentation to the City. Once all parties determine the work is complete and the Contractor has delivered all close-out documentation to the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Final Certificate for Payment. The Consultant shall be responsible for providing final certifications based on the entire scope of work for the Project. dd) Consultant and Design Consultant Relationship: These services outlined herein are intended to provide support to both the City and the Design Consultant during the construction phase of the Project. The Consultant shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement under the supervision and contractual directives of the Project Administrator, and shall refer all matters pertaining to this Agreement to the City. In matters relating to the design 28 concept and constructability thereof, the Consultant shall conduct this scope of services under the technical directives issued by the Design Consultant such that the Design Consultant's EOR can provide final certification of the design components at Project Closeout. 3. Provide qualified personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement. The personnel shall be qualified by experience and education. Submit in writing to the City for review and approval, the names of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, including a detailed resume for each. The City reserves the right to have Consultant's personnel removed and substituted from the project, if the employee's conduct or performance is detrimental to the project. The City reserves the right to request periodic rotation of field personnel. 4. The Consultant shall furnish the City with a Quality Assurance Plan within 15 calendar days after the award of this agreement. The QA Plan shall detail the procedures, evaluation criteria, and instructions of the Consultant's organization for providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Significant changes to the work requirements may require the Consultant to revise the QA Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to keep the plan current with the work requirements. The Plan shall include, but not be limited to: • Consultant's QA Organization and its functional relationship to the part of the organization performing the work under the Agreement. The authority, responsibilities and autonomy of the QA organization shall be detailed as well as the names and qualifications of personnel in the quality control organization. • Methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products. • Outline the types of records which shall be generated and maintained during the execution of the QA program. • Methods used to control subconsultant and vendor quality. • An officer of the Consultant firm shall certify that the inspection and documentation was done in accordance with specifications, plans, City standards, and City's procedures. • Maintain adequate records of the quality assurance actions performed by the organization (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing services and products under this Agreement. All records shall indicate the nature and number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found, and the corrective actions taken. 5. Provides assistance in preparing for arbitration hearings or litigation that occurs during the Agreement time in connection with the construction project covered by this Agreement. 6. Provide qualified engineering witnesses and exhibits for arbitration hearings or litigation in connection with the Agreement. 7. Provide services determined necessary for the successful completion and closure of the Construction Contract. 8. Provide Post construction claims review The Consultant shall analyze the claim, engage in negotiations leading to settlement of the claim, and prepare and process the required documentation to close out the claim. 9. The Consultant may be asked to provide all or some construction engineering and inspection services including inspectors, construction managers and/or construction administration staff for City Right -of -Way constructidn projects. 29 SCHEDULE A-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. — for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2017 -028 -KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: , to be considered part of this Agreement. Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: City's Project Date Administrator/Manager Days Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator -Director Date 30 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION AGREEMENT BETWEENT THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS Project Name and No: Scope of Services: Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage of work complete as identified in the Consultant Service Order. 31 SCHEDULE C CONSULTANT HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE REEk 2017 -028 -KR PROP SSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CEI) FIRMS TO PR VIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDEDBASIS CATEGORIES HOURLY RATES $182.6 58.5 Pro Pr t P IncIpal Senior Senior Scheduler Scheduler 5 Insp ctor (�L) r L Field o C ns rue n) )0 h Id Ins cctor for CMJ Engin ar T Enee Senior Elect, ca Electricel Engineer SenIor Meclianfcal Engineer $7 $10434 $73,0 $1. 4. 4 $78, .O936 155.65 214,7 $135,65 114.78 $135.05 $ 14, 1 5.0 $t uctural $ I Ins ector $ 4, Clerical/A.0111h $41,74 Proect Affl Ira $ 2r ,00 Resident Com 5rnce Sp I&t/LAP CoOr n or $ 3. 0 Meehan al Engineer 1orltrudurat Eng neer Se 32 SCHEDULE D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SWORN AFFIDAVITS 33 SCHEDULE E APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 1. Professional Service Industries, Inc. The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank. ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 2017-29881 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION N OF THE MAYOR AND CITY` COMMISSION OF THE CITY Y O MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTIIN THE RECOMMENDATION F THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST EOR QUALIFICATIONS (REQ) NO. 2017 -028 -KB, FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION EN INEEI I II AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CSI SERVICES ON AN AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE -QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES, S, N AN UA NEEDED" PAIS AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATION$ WITH EAC CONSULTING, INC., AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER, A CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP., AS THE THIRD RANTED PROPOSER; PARSONS RINCKERHOFP, INC AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC,/ AS E FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER, AND FURTHER AUTHORIZJNG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS TSI EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION, WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, the City Commis approved the iss Request for Qualifications (RFS) No, 20170 8 for Profosekinal Construction En r sang aril Inspection (CEI) Firers to Provide Various CEI Services o.n an "As Needed H i end WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2017-0284(8 (the `RFC'') was released on February 10, 217; and WHEREAS, voluntary pre pro sal M was held on February23, 2017; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2017, the City received total of 18 r I and WHEREAS, the Committee n ned on May 10, 2017 to r lw andthe r rrrr ining proposals; and WHEREAS, tl Committee mitt was provided an overview f the prote riformation r ive to the City's Cone f Silence Ordinance anti the v rnm nt Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking was as follows EAC Consulting, Inc,the first ranked proposer, StaMec Consulting Ser i• , Inc„ the second ranked proposer; A&P Consulting Trans :: tion Engineers Corp., as the third ranked proposer; Parsons Srinokerhoff, Ind., as the fourth ranked proposer and Calvin, Giordano & Associates, iiia, as the fifth ranked proposer, and WHEREAS/ after reviewing the qualifications o each trrr , and having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager has recommended that the a orr and the City Commission a t e the Administration to establish a pool of pre pre-qualfired consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engin ring and inspection services, on an as needed" basis, and further authorize the Administration to eater into negotiations wit EAC Consulting, Inc., as the first .ranked proposer; Stantec Consulting Services, Ir .,as the second ranked 35 pro ser; A&P Consulting Tran portabon Engineers C rpx the third rnked proposer: Parsons Erinckerhoff, tri $, as the fourth ranked propos d tin, Go..no & Associates, ino, as the fifth ranked proposen NOW; THEREFORE; E l LY RESOLVED BY THE "AYR AND C TY COMMISSION F THE CITY OF CHFLORIDA;that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of t le City r pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications F Nd 2011 -028 -KB for Professional Construction Engineering end Inspection (CEO Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an 'As Needed Basis": authorize the ministration to establish e pool ofpre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engineering and inspection .. an as needed" basis, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with EAO Consulting, lno, as the first ranked proposer; Stantec Consulting Services; Inc, as the second ranked proposer; A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp, as the third ranked proposers Parsons Brinckerhoff; Ino, as the fourth ranited proposer: and Calvin, Giordano & As d t ; Int, as the fifth ranked proposer; and further authortze theayor and Oily Clerk to execute agreements with each of theforegoing pro eery upon conclusion of successful ne otlat on Admin suet n. SED AND ADOPTED this day f 44,, 201 R RPUR. 201742 36 MIAMI BEACH � M SSION MEMO DUM T: H r rable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Arm L. Morales, Cit anger DATE: June 7, 2017 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI II ACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE E t M ND TI I OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFC)) NO. 20174)28 -KB, FOR, PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO R "I E VARIOUS. CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PREQUALIFIED' CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES, N AN "AS NEEDED' BASIS: AUTHORIZING IZIN THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH EAC CONSULTING, I , AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED S CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS CORP, AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF, INC,. AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND CALVIN, GI RD N ASSOCIATES, INC.; AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER: AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON N LUSI N OF SUCCESSFUL N: TI TI N S BY THE ADMINISTRATION. Adopt the R* ;uti n, MALlita Adequate management of construction projectby the A rrau l tion ream implementation of CEI services Including, but not limited , -general r i ti , value pre - r tru . n, field observations, shop 'hp submittals, quality control, and closeouts. The illty to have a rotating list of CEI firms available to provide these sakes enables the City to effectively amlefficiently meri e these projects.arch 13, 2013, the I r and City Comniisslon approved the awardof a contact, pursuant to Request for Qualifications N. 5241/12 for Professional Construction Engineering ami Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Seivices on s Needed Basin', to the top five rank.ed proposers: Atkins North 37 america, lr c,, Berr edo Ajamil & Partners, Inc., Chen Moorean Associiates, Corzo Oeste Carbon° Thompson Selman, PACTS , and Parson Brinckerboff, ince t. "Agreement), This Agreement is effective through October 8, 2017. in order to complete a successor apresrnent, on February 8, 2017, the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications FO) No, 2017 -028 -KB for Professional Constriction Engineering and inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on eh "As .Needed saws", On February 10, 2017, the RFDissued, A voluntary pre -proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on February 23, 2017, RFQ responses re dui and received on April 14, 2017„ The City received a total of 18 proposals, The City received proposals from the following ms6: 300 Engineering Group, PA 4A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp. *Alpha Construction and n ineeri. Corporation ▪ Ameo Foster Wheeler Environment &Infrastructure,1 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, 1Inc Chen Moore and Associates C1MA Ervimering Corp, • CPM North America FPLC EAC Consulting, Inc. Keith & Schnars Metho Engineering, Inc. • Network Engineedne Services, New Millenrium Engineering, Inc. • Parsons Brinokerhoff, Inc. Penroni Associates, Inc, Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP Sch i bke-S%skin &Ass iates, Inc tee Consulting Services, Inc. ncY n , 2017, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LT # 238-2017, The Evaluation Committee convolved on May 10, 2017, to consider proposals sals receivers, The Committee was comprised of Eugene Serenest, Civil Engineer 111, Public Works Erysnowing Department, City of Miami each; David Gomez, Senior Capita Project Coordinator, Capital improvement Program Division. City of Miami Beach; Jose Rivas, OM Engl r 111, Public Works ineen Department, City of Miami i ch; and Mina 8annandi, Senior Capital Project Coordinator, Capital improvement Program DMelon, City of Miami Beach, The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information res vs to the Cites Com of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal, The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the methadon criteria established in the IQs The evaluation process following order: 1. VAC Consulting, In aped in raking of proposers indicatedin itecmerit A, in the 38 2. Stantec Consulting SerVICOS, 3. A & P Consultirg Transportation Engineers, Corp. 4. P ons Brinckerhoff, Inc. 8. C4An, Giordano & Associates. Inc. 6. Metric Engineering, Inc. 7. Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LIP 8. Keith & Solvers 9. New Millennium Engineering, Inc. 9. Schwebke-Shiskin & Associat: 11, Amex Foster Wheeler Environment & infrastructure, Inc. 12. Network Engineering Services, Inc. 13. Chen Moore and Associates 14. Alpha Const ion and Engineering Corporation 15,300 Engineering Group, P.A. 16. Pennoni Associates, Inc. 17. CIMA Engineering Corp. 18. CPM North America PPLC A surnmaty of each top-ranked firm follows: EAC Constfiting„ According to the information provided by the flmt, EAC Consulting, inc. has maintained a good professional standing with the State of Florida Division of Corporations for over 20 years and has held a professional engineering certification with the State of Fkerkia Depr, . 'ent 01 Business Regulation and the Florida Board of Professional Engineering since its inception. All key professional staff members possess ali the required licenses and certifications required to undertake and complete CEI services for the City. The firm has more than 95 professionals and support staff, all located vithin the State of Florida and working out of four (4) offices located in Miami -Dade, Steward, Palm Beach and Orange Counties. States Consulting Services, Inc. According to the infommtkin provided by the firm, Stantec, founded in 1954, provides professional consulting :Moss in planning, englivering, architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, surveying, geotechnical, environmental sciences, project rnorogemeni, and project economics for infrastructure d !Willies projects. Continually striving to balance economic., environmental, and social responsiblilles, they are recognized as a d -class leerier and innovator in the delivery of sustainable solders. They support pubfic and private sector clients in a diverse range of markets at every stage, from the initial conceptualization and financial feasibility study to project completion and beyond. A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers, Corp. According to live Information provided by the firm, A & P Consulting is a multidisciplinary Miami - Dade County headquartered engineering company that was established In 1997. t firm has more than 95 local employees dedicated exclusively to transportation/infra hire projects. A & P Consulting prides itself in serving a wide variety of clients and attending to their individual needs. The firm is I to Aided in client satisfaction providing their clients with focused and innovative solutions that yield cost effective results. Since its establishment the firm has 39 completed a myriad of projects ranging in scale and complexity The broad spectrum of .. r - winning projects provides the diverse foundation necessary to triumph over any chsller e that y arise. It is this diversity, which enables the firm to guarantee effective project execution for large-scale government projects while simultaneously delivering to private and goverment clients the delicacy that Is indispensable to their particular needs, Parsons rinc erhoff, Inc, According to the Info tion provided by the firm, Psrrso rfkerhoff provides engineering and m 'tldiscipiinary services in a vast array of industry sectors, \Mth a focus on technical excellence and client service. Throughout Florida, the firm services a diverse re e of transportation projects, administering Infrastructure and construction expertise, The firds construction experience comprises construction management, program management, and CEI traditional and alter ative delivery approaches with public -sector clients such as FOOT, aunties, municipalities, expressway authorities, aviation departments and school boards. Through their statewide experience, tl firm has developed an ln•depth kno ded e FDOT and expressway authority's policies and procedures end Florida contractor construction methodologies and site co (tions, enablirg the firm to consistently deliver projects that are on. schedule, within budget and designed and built in conformance with contract plans end specifications, elvirr, i ssoclates, I no, According to the Information provided by the fine, Calving Giordano & Associates has a proven track record, technical excellence, exceptional protect management, reliability, responsiveness and al un -paralleled dedication. Thsa firm has been providirtg services in the - portatior Industry for over 15 years. They strive to ensure their clients' projects are built in accordance with FOOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, FDEP, Cities, and Count' approved plans and speciflca ou s. Finally, Cuing Giordano & Associates proves experienced professio I engineers, project admhistrators, contract support specialists, resident compliance specialist, LAP coordinators, inspection staff, project managers, and eddrninitrtive staff for ail facets of roadway Emd bridge construction projects, After reviev4 aIi the submissions and resultsof the ev ituetion process I reconir end that the Mayor end City !Oommis:sion approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to establish pool of prequailfled consultants for specific tasks relating to construction engineering and Inspection services, es, on an "as needed basis,'" In order to assure that the City's needs for construction emirmerirAg and inspection services Is available expeditiously from firms qualified to perform the work*. SAC Consulting, Inc, as the first ranked proposer, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc, as the second rerlited proposer; A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp, as the third ranked proposed Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer, and Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., Mkt fifth ranked proposer, Further, t recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk be authoorr . to execute agreements, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration, with the pre -qualified liarst 40 Throughout The City The cost of the related senaces, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds approved through the City's budgetirio process. Grant funding may also be utilized. imaislathe Public Works/Capftal improyem nit e ts/Procu 11.7M, Description a Attachment A o Resokition org , 41 meat 42 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 44 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 45 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miarn Beach:, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachil,gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS April 6, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The -deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Friday, April 14, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. I. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Pre -Proposal Meeting Sign In Sheet II. MODIFICATIONS. A. Section 0300 Submittal Instructions &Format, Tab 3 has be revised as follows: Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of ServiccG Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timoline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. B. Appendix F Contract, Article 5 has be revised as follows: * * * inspection services and material testing/special inspection servie -, provided that 1 r' ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS 5.2.8 Pre Deci. _. e.S4-n - E—n-vi er>tal-rover atie- s -and site evaluation hat surveys of the exis j-structure--req-uir-ed-to-eemplete-as-built desumentation are not additional -ser -vises- 5.2s— e4echnieal-enEfineer-+ncf—Providing geotechnical -en 4neering services or site survoys, III. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: On page 13 it states "For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services" Where can we find Tab 3? Al: Please refer to Modification A above. Q2: I would Like to know if there are any restrictions for Sub -consultants in relation to teaming - up with several prime Consultants on Miami Beach CEI (RFQ 2017 -028 -KB) project. A2: There are no restrictions for sub consultants teaming up with several prime consultants. Q3: Any chance the submittal deadline for subject RFQ will be postponed? A3: Submittal deadline was extended pursuant to Addendum No. 1. Q4: Who is on the Evaluation Committee? A4: Evaluation committee has not yet been established. Q5: On page 13 the instructions for Tab 3 - Approach and Methodology ask us to address the project timeline, As this RFQ is for CEI services, the project timeline is a function of the construction contract and is therefore out of our control. The same can be said for identifying phasing options - that is a function of the design and the CEI firm has no control over that aspect of the project. How should we address these two issues? A5: Please refer to Modification A above. Q6: Tab 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements states that Appendix Cis to be filled out and included. C1 in Appendix C indicates that proposers are to include a minimum of 5 CEI references in the past 10 years - must include project name, project description, commencement and completion dates, project contact information, and prime proposer's role. Tab 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm states that proposers should include relevant experience (but is not restricted by 10 years) - must include for each project a project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone and email, and term of engagement, It appears that these 2 sections are asking for the same information, except Tab 2,1 does not have a 10 year restriction. Please clarify that this is the case and that projects 2 ADDENDUMTic). 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEO) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS referenced in Appendix C1 should &so be included under Tab 2.1. A6: Proposer may submit the same projects listed in Appendix Cl or additional projects; it is at the discretion of the proposer. Q7: Is there a conflict of interest if a material testing company has a contract with the City and is Included as a sub consultant in our proposal? A7: There is no conflict; however this contract will not require material testing. Please refer to Modification B above. Q8: Page 26, Item C1.1 - Question: the item states "...(CEI) services to other governmental organizations or public entities..." can references from the City of Miami Beach be used? A8: References may be from the City of Miami Beach. Q9: Please advise if the Project Manager must be a licensed professional or can a person having suitable qualifications and experience be designated as the Project Manager? A9: The PM does not have to be a licensed professional, Suitable qualifications and experience will be sufficient. Q10: Responses to Appendix A will be as a separate document or typed into PDF form? A10: Responses to Appendix A may be provided in a separate document or typed into a PDF form. Please keep in mind This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. Q11: 2.3 Financial Capacity, is the Dun & Bradstreet (SQR) required at time of proposal or after selection of consultants? Al1: At the request of the city, proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the procurement contact named in the solicitation. Q12: Will we need to include complete services for public information, not to be done by the City? Al2: No, Q13: Our company wishes to amend our company policy with regard to Benefits by including the below statement. Does the City find this company policy acceptable for the purpose of compliance with its "Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494"? 3 Statement to be Included: "In the event that a law in a state or specific jurisdiction or a ADDENDUM. NO, 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS condition of a client contract requires us to provide benefits for domestic partners, we will provide the coverage required by applicable law or contract to domestic partners who are required to be covered." A13: Response should be submitted with your proposal for the City's review. Q14: On Page 3 of the RFQ there is a statement right above Item 3, That reads " This RFQ is not governed by the Requirements of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. Section 287.055 is referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation's Act which governs how Professional Services contracts are procured in Florida, Please clarify the intent of the City regarding this statement. Will price be a consideration? Or will professional qualifications be the only consideration? And if so why is this contract not governed by F.S. 287,055? A14: Only professional experience and qualifications are being, considered for this solicitation. Q15: Who will be the Contract Manager or Project Manager for the City of Miami Beach? A15: Contract/Project managers may be from any City department requiring professional construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services, Q16: Has the Technical Review Committee been appointed? If so who are the members? A16: Evaluation committee members have not yet been established. Q17: Will any of the projects that will be assigned under this contract. be .funded with Federal funds or through Local Agency Program (LAP) funding? A17: It is the intent of the City to use this contract to provide CE&I services for any City project including projects that are partially fundedwith federal funds, Funding for CE&I services will be paid with local funding. Q18: Will this contract include construction inspection services for buildings or other vertical structures? A18: Yes. Q19: Will Threshold Inspections be part of the services of this contract? A19: Please refer to Modification B above. Q20: How many contracts will the City award for this procurement? A20: It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will be contacted on an as -needed basis. 4 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Q21: What will be the duration of this contract? A21: The term of this contract will be for a period of three (3) years with the option to renew two (2) additional one (1) year terms. Q22: What will be the dollar value of this contract? A22: To be determined. 023: Please advise if form 330 is required to be included in the Statement of Qualifications? A23: The Standard Form 330 is not a submittal requirement of this solicitation. Q24: Is there a conflict of interest if a material testing company has a contract with the City and , is included as a sub consultant in our proposal? A24: Please refer to response A7 above. Q25: Will the information from and presented at the Pre -Proposal Meeting on February 24th be published as an addendum to the RFQ? A25: Questions raised in the pre -proposal meeting have been included in this addendum. Q26: Does the City intend to request the D&B SQR to be submitted with Tab 2 and willthis be stipulated in an addendum? A26: See response All above. Q27: Please clarify the page and/or file size limitations for the SOQ as discussed in the Pre- Proposal meeting? A27: The page size and/or file size is at the discretion of the proposer. Q28: What is the previous RFQ Advertisement # to the present "Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI services on an as Needed Basis" # 2017 -028 -KB? A28: The previous RFQ No. was 52.11/12. 029: Can you please upload the Pre -proposal meeting sign -in sheet? A29: Sign -in sheet is attached as Exhibit A. Q30; On page 18 (#3) its requesting (3) references, also on page 26 under 01 (#1) It's also requesting (5) references. Do we need to submit a total of (8) references ? Or just (5) as stated in the pre-bid meeting? A30: Please refer to response A6 above. Q81: Do we need to submit the Appendix F- Contract (page 38) with submittal package? Or is 5 ADDENDUM NO, 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS this only submitted when the project has been awarded? A31: The contract is not a proposal submittal requirement. Q32: Do we need to submit any pricing? A32: Pricing is not a proposal submittal requirement. Q33: Can you clarify page 13,TAB 3 — It states "for each scope of services outlined in Tab 3, Scope of services, submit detailed information on the approach... a) Are you referring to scope of work outlined in Appendix C — page 26-33 (C2 Statement of Work)? b) What do you mean for each (underlined above)? A33: Please refer to response Al above. Q34: How many CEI firms will be selected from this RFQ? A34: Please refer to response A20 above. Q35: Appendix A, number 5 states: "Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub -consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation." Where in the solicitation is "controlling financial interest" defined? A35: Please refer to the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(a7miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Kristy Bada Telephone: 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 Email: KristyBada@miamibeachfl,gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders' questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Al nis curement Director 6 ADDENDUM NO, 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017.028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS EXHIBIT A Pre -Proposal Meeting Sign -in Sheet 7 ADDENDUM NO. 5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017.028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS MIAMI BEACH • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 20 -KB FOR PROFESSIONAL. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS tkiytFi,,4U,1„..'.:414'':',,,N,',44•-:,*,..;i L i: rt.P. ,,- . 1 1:' A1F, ,,,i,:l.p.4,7,;:c-,..y,; :•,, . ,' .'4'.'''',',,,4*X.Pcs4 ' , a,,i°•:•,-,,e;i,":::',.,ti.'-r.Y-f:,,:iivlio.,ly,:,.,•44:-.1em,1,. 305-673-7000 Kri.' sty Bada Procurement - CMB kristybada(cD,miamib eachfl.go V ext, 6218 si4,1t7eS —r"dazz-° -Je-Te.•//..9051,7.5&, . = a ,,,,,,,-, 4) S4 59 3 eSS8 c-,rn , z__ /14.47-&—eD 6.7A1,477e2 62 -Ohl., 9•54-lbscpsil 4201-; 7:/40 Q e2' c )4.45/11' ya* 770471,0a,VO (''', A gk.:' c19:67 6114 17;77P,661,1 ot,a it b (2011404 (Om ce/etiri cr, 6;11) ..,,..,'6'1771 (:1967 Ey i C., •'70 ine L COMPeiveio Ce, Ci'll _,,f -'4C-- Com tS KJ. i -i1-101 1 • MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 0900- 0.2e - TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2710-6;(8 FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS ' ''''';'''•-'-':'•''rN . . • ' i ' :i., ' ''' .,(4,e -k431. lik N ' ' - .0.4i,'--.M:F.iiiAfr,,,,, 5 ! : ' : . : : ,,t,-,11i.o.,A;,. '' '-',,,,,, . 7.k. .it W ,;,1;5 ... v 4 ,;•, .1.: fi .'!....i.:1;4::''. Yt-l!;;;(' .t a; I t- e n , o 1 V irl e I: ^ A ri 1:67 4') l% 0 in 60-e--egeiv4 3eig': .-14.2.74-7 -, e./..A4.,v,.‘ 41-- c -o iv.rz./.2.--,y•/4‘. ,,,,,(e, a / 4,64,e2.074 -'4,4A, .0 °..:(y _ e clo5 -3oS -* r-k16,41g. 04,,,,„ ......5-etv, Mg_ i 61,[5•• a..„, ), _---im) ' - , . .a os: 30S---4-71/3 ; P:56% 4,44,14...Q2,14-Rvegazr. • "' 36C. CS4 4-5'eil- 2. nee -210.60A -Se' ar-i 0001.10 a ' • r • `20S---44,-?qoo 2 MIAiV\t BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 20_17.4-9.3=k`B FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS A7X.1.1 t SLP x) '• y{j sy5 �i41 41, .4, . 4 A vi3 r� F 3 � Ni U '1DY7�k 1 k -J /G /� }PcT 3 Or-- z3— o --- e-, Ho2.4c ' 2OLN.a.a -17-6---YL --- . 6-53T-` (2s 7861/67/ l 4r, e ,.5. wEfi 3 MIAMI BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN -IN SHEET DATE: February 23, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2117.40-3=gg FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS k'.,r0..j,,.,,, t: ' W - ": ' SMF PHON FCG ritC> teitze- Ot, ,C:,,,C1) 1.-Avai ftA "n4 it,,oeic> --';.. 1,44.1i.vz_ AG:5 Otle.-1(?.., Keic-LA co y,„1 C 1 a tild ).& k a Ki'eejll P 1St -6 r l 0 el Mourn, os.= c.01,,i - -9-1 0 0 C I a. Will &He 1060-n 1 ecro, (0 m f-\,..,,..k Yv‘ cal SA..00,1,0 K4,-01-1Soc;"-\----1. Le\ 6\11ClbtL C '.,-) ( 0 m\Atr)-) 5 30,J 8a1aaa 1 \-c,bq,--se.Q.) ( ()s..„ pie/5,m fr-24.,,,..fr, ig19/04,4i5v,,,A.)71-;r4/0,-e:4751,6, nis(9 i),14 F:2 6,,,„41 at C- t VC 't t-:-. '-aA4CLo ,est_u_4_,,,,,L, eoc,\ LA jt.,.., Pa/tot:A.-3 , i r RI:1dr cPM NOPII- A14/24624 , PLAC F -04B 6;1 6)24,1Z yzAro 7 Cr nell di i (014 „---7 J 'P''P E'ic'tduE/E9-114-/SP 6 5 6 ill 0-2,A,01.11( -(76'031‘f(i- j. rc‘ 1 reLral a, c_cal ' ' 4 M AMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachll,gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305.673.7490 Fax: 786.3944002 ADDENDUM NO, 4 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 30, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, April 10, 2017,.at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned. to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solety responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at Rafae1Granado(7a rniamibeachfl,gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bade 305673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. rely nis rement Director 1 ADDENDUM NO, 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS AM I B EAC} City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3'd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachfl.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305673-7490 Fax: 786-3944002 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 28, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP Is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). L RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 on Thursday, April 6, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays. for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing, to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(c mlamiibeachfl.gov, Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBade@miamibeachfl,gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to .submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. e "-I Al De s P ocur. ent Director ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS • MEAMJLBEA:CH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachfl,cgov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tei: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 28, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined.), I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Thursday, April 5th,. 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted, Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado(c�miamibeachfl,gov, Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext, 6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sir( ly; Ale Denis Pro ure ent Director 1 UPRIMMSRIFAMIMMUMA ADDENDUM NO, 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS M:AMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachfl,gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS March 21, 2017 This Addendum to the above -referenced RFP is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFP is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, April 3rd, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach' Procurement Department . 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the Individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadomiamibeachfl,qov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000, ext. 6218 KristyBada@miarnlbeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFP submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Ale D is Rr� urement Director ADDENDUM NO, 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO, 2017.028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS EQUEST FO Q,ALIFICATIONS (RFC)) PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CE 1 SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS 2017 -028 -KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: MARCH 27, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: MIAMIBEACH KRISTY BADA, CONTRACTING OFFICER III PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 1 www.miamibeachfl.gov 1 kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov tvlAA I A ; EAC TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 17 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 36 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 38 RFQ 2017 -028 -KB SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL, This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the "City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the "contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (wn w publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE, Adequate management of construction projects by City of Miami Beach departments requires implementation of Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services during construction. The ability to have a rotating list of CEI firms available to provide these services for various City departments would enable the City to effectively and efficiently manage the construction phase of these projects. The scope of services describes and defines the CEI services which are required for contract administration, inspection, and materials sampling and testing for the construction projects. The Purpose of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to qualify Professional Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) firms to provide various CEI services to the City on an "as needed" basis. Additionally, the terms "FIRM", "PROPOSER", "CONSULTANT," "PRIME PROPOSER" are used interchangeably and shall refer to the firm that will contract with the City for the performance consultant services and work for the project. "As needed" basis means that each firm awarded a contract pursuant to this RFQ will be placed on a professional CEI list where the City may call upon it to perform professional projects, as assigned by the City Administration. As the need for services arise, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will' be contacted on an as -needed basis. This RFQ is not governed by the requirements of Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. 3, SOLICITATION TIMETABLE. The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued February 10, 2017 Pre -Submittal Meeting February 23, 2017 at 10:OOam Deadline for Receipt of Questions March 17, 2017 at 5:OOpm Responses Due. March 27, 2017 at 3:00'pm Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 3 B AC Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: KRISTY BADA Telephone: 305-673-7490 Email: KRISTYBADA • dditionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranado(c miamibeachfl.gov: or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. MIAMIBEACHFL,GOV The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre -proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre -PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre -Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1- 888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE -PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by, prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre - submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE, This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shawl be solely -0 -KB 'FAO - responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.misniibeachfl.gov/procuremer (scroNl.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE • PROTEST PROCEDURES • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE -CERTIFIED SERVICE - DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS & SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub -contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the. City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to,, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. R l► 0 ! s -K ift)°a '`!BEACH 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters (five (5) days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. NOT USED. 18. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service -disabled veteran business enterprise, ,and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result, of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service -disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service -disabled veteran business enterprise. 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1) The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4) The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. 2: -KB 6 BEACH 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Rejection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re -advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one -hundred twenty (120) calendar days after proposal opening date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense) of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non -submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. V ' A 4.✓ mom. / \,C I Y 26. TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. 0 7-0 8 trAk ,s , ' 3 EAC: 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer (s) is in agreement, other units of govemment or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as -needed basis. through the City's spot market purchase provisions, 39. DISPUTES, In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. trivkv . 3EACH 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43. OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. RF -0 - B 10 /B ACH 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS. A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order (or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases, the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract, to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 -0 :-KB 11 SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3 -ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed, 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix 0, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience & Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet, The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal,dnb,com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended, that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun & Bradstreet at 800.4242495. RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 12 Approach and Methodology For each scope of service outlined in Tab 3, Scope of Services, submit detailed information on the approach and methodology how proposer plans to accomplish the proposed scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub -consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). 0 7-0 :-KB 13 trA1 f F BEAC »M 1 r SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee, The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received, with or without conducting interview sessions. step 1, -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications Approach and Methodology TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 PC INTS 70 30 ?0o 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement Management to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. ter) 2 Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP' 2.POINTS 5 RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 14 BEAC 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Committee- Member 1, Step 1 Points Proposer. A 82 Proposer B, 76 Proposer G - 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Total 104 91 92 Rank Committee Member 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Total 101 100 84 Rank 1 2 3? Committee Member 2 . Low Aggregate'Score Fina Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Total 102 89 78 Rank. Ranking* 1 3 T 3i &• * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manaaer for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RKY 2017 -028 -KB 15 APPENDIX A M A /V\ B E AC H Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 16 Solicitation No: 2017 -028 -KB Solicitation Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Procurement Contact: Kristy Bada Tel: 305-673-7490 Email: kristybada@miamibeachfl,gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS. CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire "and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S) PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS (HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO,: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO,: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. R 1 -K 17 Veteran Owned Business. Is Proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? I I YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran -owned business or a service -disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government, as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References & Past Performance. Proposer shall submit at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name & Title, 3) Address, 4) Telephone, 5) Contact's Email and 6) Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by any public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their Proposals, in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub -consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No,2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www,miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Rf Q 2CS 17 18B 18 7. Living Wage, Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement, the hourly living wage rates listed below: Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13 (October 1, 2012), the hourly living rate will be $11 ,28/hr with health benefits, and $12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent (3%). The City may also, by resolution, elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same (in a particular year). Proposers' failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl,gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8 Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over $100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES 1I NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with (same or opposite sex) domestic partners* or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Employees with Spouses Firm Provides for Employees with Domestic Partners Firm does not Provide Benefit Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached) with all necessary documentation. Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is finale Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www,miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 17- 19 9. Public Entity Crimes. Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time, states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal„ or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.01.7 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287,133, Florida Statutes, and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non -Discrimination. Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990, the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a) of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from, or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital or familial status, age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full 'compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi, Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article, with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices, and, standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance, set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City wilt strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e -procurement system, PublicPurchase,com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required, subm't under separate cover. R Q • -• 8-K 20 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the "City") for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation, or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation, either before or after issuance of an award, shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications, and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation, as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, partners and employees, as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete. The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation, the selection and the award process, or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer, and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof. Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only, and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive. agreements executed among the parties. Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason, or for no reason, without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government -in -the -Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications, the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true, accurate and complete, to the best of its knowledge, information, and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2b 17 -028 -KB 21 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate, Name of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: A Title of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA On this day of , 20 , personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RF 1 - 28-K 22 (A. APPENDIX B A,M BEACH "No Bid" Form RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED''' BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 -KB 23 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to proposal Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements ®Unable to meet insurance requirements eDo not offer this product/service OTHER. (Please specify) We do do not _ want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Kristy Bada STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2017 -003 -KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 24 APPENDIX C trA MAMBEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ N o . 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 -KB 25 C1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Bidder (defined as the Firm) shall provide a minimum of five (5) references providing professional construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services to other governmental organizations or public entities in the last ten (10) years. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, commencement and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email) and prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. The Consultant's Basic Services that may be provided under the Agreement entered into pursuant to this RFQ shall (at a minimum) consist of, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Administer the Construction Contract and monitor and inspect the work performed by the Contractor such that the project is constructed in reasonable conformity with the plans, specifications, and special provisions of the Construction Contract. 2. Resident Engineering Services Coordinate the Construction Contract administration activities of all parties other than the Contractor involved in completing the construction project. Services shall include maintaining the required level of surveillance of Contractor activities, interpreting plans, specifications, and special provisions for the Construction Contract. Maintain complete, accurate records of all activities and events relating to the project and properly document all project changes. The following services shall be performed: a) General Coordination: The Consultant shall communicate daily or periodically with the City, the Design Consultant and Contractor, as needed. They shall report on concerns as it relates to the construction effort and activities. In addition, the Consultant shall also coordinate with the Public Information Officer (P1O) where notifications such as utility outages, road closures, etc. may be required. The Consultant shall monitor and verify that the Contractor has made the required notifications to the utility owners, residents and businesses as may be required. b) Estimating Services: Provide accurate cost estimates and schedules to avoid cost overruns and schedule slips. Prepare cost estimates and schedules by helping manage resources and supporting assessment and decision making. Services may encompass a wide range of cost - related aspects of engineering and program management, but in particular cost estimating, cost analysis/cost assessment, design -to -cost, schedule analysis/planning and risk assessment. c) Value Engineering Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, and provide cost estimating information at Value Engineering meetings between the City, the Design Consultant, and the Contractor for the Project. d) Resident's Information Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, address RF - 2 -KB 26 residents' concerns, participate, produce meeting minutes, and take a lead role in Resident Information Meetings with the City for the Project. e) Pre -Construction Meetings: The Consultant shall be expected to attend, participate, produce meeting minutes and take a lead role in Pre -Construction Meeting with the City, Design Consultant and Contractor for the Project. The Pre -construction Meeting shall be scheduled once the City issues the first Notice -to -Proceed to the Contractor. f) g) Weekly Construction Progress Meetings: The Consultant shall attend, participate and take a lead role in weekly construction project meetings with the City, P10, Design Consultant and Contractor on the Project. These meetings shall serve as forums to review the status of construction progress, discuss construction issues, discuss schedule and/or cost concerns, discuss potential changes or conflicts, review the status of shop drawing submittals and Construction Document clarifications and interpretations, and to resolve problems before they become critical. Consultant shall prepare weekly meeting minutes and distribute to all meeting attendees, review the two week look ahead provided by the Contractor and provide comments or objections to written statements within the specified timeframe. The Consultant shall prepare detailed weekly reports that describe the construction activities, progress, incidents and issues that have occurred on the construction site and distribute to the attendees in advance of the weekly construction progress meetings. Field Observations: The Consultant shall conduct field observations on a daily basis throughout the duration of construction. Field observations may be provided jointly by the City and the Consultant. If and when necessary, the City shall provide part-time construction inspectors for the duration of the Project. The role of the City's construction inspectors shall be limited. The Consultant shall be present at the construction site daily during the construction phase of the Project and shall be expected to be available, as needed, throughout the Contractor's work day. h) Stormwater Permit - Verify that the Contractor is conducting inspections, preparing reports and monitoring all storm water pollution prevention measures associated with the project. For each project that requires the use of the NPDES General Permit, inspector the inspector (at. least one) should have successfully completed the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Training and Certification Program for Inspectors and Contractors". The Consultant's inspector shall be familiar with the requirements set forth in the FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 57, No. 187, Friday, September 5, 1992, pages 4412 to 4435 "Final NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites" and the City's guidelines. j) Specialty Design Consultant Site Visits: The Consultant shall monitor the number of specialty site visits requested by the Contractor or City and conducted by the Design Consultant. When it becomes evident that a specialty site visit from the design Engineer of Record (EOR) shall be required, the Consultant shall notify the EOR to discuss and schedule a mutually acceptable time for meeting at the construction site. Daily Reports: The Consultant shall prepare daily reports, on the same date as construction occurs, to record the daily performance of the Contractor as well as other significant ""RF 7 -02 -KB 27 construction related matters. Daily reports shall be uploaded by the Consultant to e-BuilderTM' the City's document management system. At the end of each day or the beginning of the following day, the Consultant shall forward the original daily reports to the City for review. The Consultant shall maintain and file paper copies of the daily reports onsite for reference. The daily reports shall include records of when the Contractor is on the job-site, general field observations, weather conditions, change orders, changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily drilling and testing activities, testing results, testing observations, and records of the outcome of tests and inspections. At a minimum the daily reports shall contain the following information: • Weather and general site conditions • Contractor's work force counts by category and hours worked • Description of Work performed including location • Equipment utilized • Names of visitors to the jobsite and reason for the visit • Tests made and results • Construction difficulties encountered and remedial measures taken • Significant delays encountered and apparent reasons why • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and City • Description of (potential) disputes between the Contractor and residents • Summary of additional directions that may have been given to the Contractor • Detailed record of materials, equipment and labor used in connection with extra work, or where there is reason to suspect that a claim or request for Change Order may be submitted by the Contractor • Summary of any -substantive discussions held with the Contractor and/or City • Summary of nonconforming work referenced to corresponding Non -Compliance Notice • A log of photographs taken k) Photographic Record: Consultant shall provide a photographic record of the overall progress of construction, beginning with preconstruction documentation, following with on-going construction documentation, and ending with post -construction documentation. Photographs shall be digital snapshot type taken to define the progress of the project and shall be filed. electronically by month in e=BuilderTM, the City's document management system, labeled by date, time and location. The Consultant shall upload all photos to the e-Builderm document management system on a weekly basis. I) Adherence to Construction Documents: The Consultant shall review materials and workmanship of the projects and report to the City any deviations from the Construction Documents that may come to the Consultant's attention. Consultant shall- determine the acceptability of the work and materials and, in concert with the Design Consultant (as necessary), make recommendations to the City to reject items not meeting, the requirements of the Construction Documents. m) Delivery of Unaccepted Materials to Jobsite: As new materials are delivered to the jobsite, the Consultant shall check the material's certifications and samples and verify that an approved shop drawing was submitted for the material in question. If it is determined that. a RF l► 2.1 • : K 28 submittal has not been approved, the Consultant shall immediately notify the City and issue a Non -Compliance Notice. In conjunction with the Design Consultant (as necessary), the Consultant shall direct and supervise the sampling and testing of materials to be performed by the City's independent testing laboratory. The Consultant shall maintain test report logs which shall be submitted to the City for review on a monthly basis and uploaded to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system on a weekly basis. Consultant shall also review invoices submitted by the independent testing laboratories and recommend payment by the City. n) Shop Drawing Submittals: The Consultant shall review shop drawing and product approvals throughout the duration of the construction period for familiarity prior to delivery of materials. Consultant shall verify that Contractor is maintaining a submittal log, conducting timely submittals, and uploading approved shop drawings to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. o) Issuance of Non-compliance Notices: The Consultant shall be responsible for notifying the City when they become aware of a condition that is believed to be in non-compliance with Construction Documents. Anytime the Consultant notices a potential construction problem or a condition that could result in non -complying materials, equipment or workmanship, the Consultant will need to determine whether the condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety. 1) If a condition does not pose a threat to public health or safety, immediate verbal notification or "Pre -Noncompliance Notice" of the potential non-compliance should be made to the Contractor and the City. This verbal notice shall be documented in the Consultant's daily report, as well as an e-mail to the contractor with a copy to the City's Project Coordinator advising the Contractor of potential construction problems, errors, or deficiencies that can be promptly resolved and do not warrant a Non-compliance Notice. If the Contractor fails to respond to the verbal notification within a reasonable timeframe, the Consultant shall notify the City and the City's Projects Coordinator and shall issue a written Non-compliance Notice. 2) If a condition poses an immediate threat to public health or safety, the Consultant shall notify the Contractor and City immediately and the City's Projects Coordinator shall issue a Non- compliance Notice to the Contractor. Non-compliance Notices shall include a description of the Work that does not meet the construction contract requirements, along with a required timetable for corrective work to be implemented by the Contractor. Other items that should be included in the Notice include a reference to the provision of the Construction Documents that has been violated. p) q) Damage to Existing Facilities: The Consultant shall identify any existing facilities damaged by the Contractor and verify that the Contractor has notified the respective owner(s). The Consultant shall include record of such occurrences in the daily reports. Change Orders: Consultant shall perform an independent review of any Change Orders submitted by the Contractor and provide a written statement noting recommendation for approval or denial of the Change Order to the City. If recommended for approval, the Consultant shall note if the requested cost and schedule impacts are fair and reasonable. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining a Change Order log and uploading approved Change Orders to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. The Consultant shall also participate in change request review meetings with City and Contractor to resolve and/or 29 negotiate the equitable resolution of request. r) Requests for Information/Construction Document Clarification (RFIs/CDCs): When RFIs and CDCs involve design issue interpretations, the Consultant shall coordinate with the Design Consultant, as needed, to resolve the Contractor's Requests for Information, Construction Document Clarifications, Field Orders, and other related correspondence. The Consultant shall be also be responsible for verifying that the Design Consultant is providing a written response to RFIs and CDCs in a timely manner and for processing, logging, and distributing all RFIs/CDCs. Consultant shall upload all RFI and CDC responses to e-BuilderTM, the City's document management system. s) Schedule: Analyze the Contractor's schedule(s) (i.e. baseline(s), revised baseline(s), updates, as -built, etc.) for compliance with the contract documents. Elements including, but not limited to, completeness, logic, durations, activity, flow, milestone dates, concurrency, resource allotment, and delays shall be reviewed. Verify the schedule conforms with the construction phasing and MOT sequences, including all contract modifications. Provide a written review of the schedule identifying significant omissions, improbable or unreasonable activity durations, errors in logic, and any other concerns as detailed in the contract documents. t) Pay Requisitions: Consultant shall verify Contractor's pay requisition quantities and sign -off on all pay requisition quantities in the field. Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing with the Contractor the monthly payment requisition to confirm the status of completed and uncompleted work and stored materials. The Consultant shall advise the City of quantities being approved for subsequent concurrence for payment purposes. Payment Requisitions shall only be approved by the City. u) Equipment Tests and Systems Start-up: Consultant shall be responsible for coordinating various tests for quality control on the projects; verifying that equipment tests and systems start-up are conducted in the presence of appropriate personnel; and that the Contractor is maintaining adequate records thereof. Consultant shall observe, record, and report appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-up. v) Record Drawings: Consultant shall monitor that record drawing mark-ups are properly maintained by the Contractor. The Consultant shall review the record drawing mark-ups as deemed necessary by the City. Contractor's failure to maintain the record drawings in up-to- date condition may be deemed grounds for withholding Contractor's monthly payment requisitions until such time as the record drawings are brought up-to-date. The Consultant shall notify the City if it considers the mark-up documents insufficient. The City shall make final determination of payment withholding. w) Safety: Consultants shall be expected to recognize a hazard that any reasonable non -safety professional might be expected to recognize. In addition, those safety obligations extend only to recognizable hazards that the Consultant may note while in the normal conduct of onsite business. If a situation presents itself, the following procedures should be followed: "'"71775777= 41111111WINIIIMMINE30 • Immediately direct personnel to remove themselves from the apparent danger. • Notify the Contractor's superintendent of the apparent condition that caused the concem and that the affected personnel were directed to remove themselves accordingly. • Notify the Contractor of the situation that arises concern, both in writing and verbally. • Issue a written Notice of Noncompliance stating that the Contractor should take immediate action as it deems necessary to correct the deficiency / condition. • Write a full report in the Daily Report on the condition found to be unsafe, all actions taken, and correspondence written, including times and names. • Take photographs, of the concern. • If the Contractor does not make corrections, the Consultant should notify the City. • The Consultant shall review the situation with the City for further direction. • The condition, as well as all conversations and correspondence, shall be recorded in the Consultant's Daily Report. • In the case of a construction -related accident, Consultant shall notify the City of the accident. Consultant shall direct the Contractor to prepare an accident report with a copy forwarded to the City. x) Quality Control: The Consultant shall review and monitor the Contractor's adherence to an acceptable quality control program submitted by the Contractor prior to the issuance of the second Notice -to -Proceed by the City. This program shall describe the Contractor's quality control, organizational procedures, documentation controls and processes for each phase of the work. Quality control during construction shall be the responsibility of the Contractor; however, oversight and ensuring the Contractor complies with applicable jurisdictional construction standards shall be enforced on the City's behalf by the Consultant. y) Proceeding with Disputed Work: In the event that an agreement cannot be reached on a Change Order, the Contractor must carry on the work and adhere to the project schedule in accordance with the construction contract general conditions. The Consultant shall log all forced work efforts related to disputed change order on a Forced Work Daily Log Reports which shall be signed and dated by the Consultant and the Contractor's representative at the completion of each workday. The Consultant shall forward copies of this form to the City for record purposes. z) Maintenance of Traffic (MOT): The Contractor shall provide the Consultant, City and Design Consultant with approved copies of its MOT at the Pre -Construction Meeting for general information purposes. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to verify compliance with the MOT in the field. aa) Contractor Request for Services: When the Contractor requires services from the City for issues such as water main shutdowns, tie-ins to existing water mains, special regulatory inspections, etc., a request shall be made in writing by the Contractor, and forwarded by the Consultant to the City, a minimum of three working days prior to when required. bb) Substantial Completion: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Substantial Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the substantial completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. 1-77-71777-1.1-61"1 31 If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a substantial completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the substantial completion "walk-through", perform a substantial completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City, and prepare a master punch list that describes items remaining to be completed. This master punch list shall be attached to the certificate of substantial completion. cc) Final Completion and Project Closeout: When the Contractor considers that the Work has reached Final Completion, the Contractor shall notify the Consultant who shall verify that the work has progressed to the Final Completion point in accordance the Construction Documents. If the Consultant is in agreement, the Consultant shall contact the City to agree on a schedule for conducting a Final Completion "walk-through" inspection of the Work. Consultant shall attend and participate in the Final Completion "walk-through" and perform a Final Completion inspection with the Contractor, Design Consultant and the City. If the work is determined to be incomplete, Consultant and other attendees shall each develop a punch list of items requiring completion or correction prior to consideration of final acceptance of each project which shall be forwarded to the Contractor by the Consultant for the Project. Consultant shall complete all necessary close-out and construction completion forms and documentation in coordination with the City for the Project. The Consultant shall work with the Design Consultant and the Contractor, as necessary to ascertain materials required for the closeout binder, as required by the City, and review the Operation and Maintenance manuals for each project for completeness prior to forwarding documentation to the City. Once all parties determine the work is complete and the Contractor has delivered all close-out documentation to the City, the Consultant shall prepare a Final Certificate for Payment. The Consultant shall be responsible for providing final certifications based on the entire scope of work for the Project. dd) Consultant and Design Consultant Relationship: These services outlined herein are intended to provide support to both the City and the Design Consultant during the construction phase of the Project. The Consultant shall perform the services outlined in this Agreement under the supervision and contractual directives of the Project Coordinator, and shall refer all matters pertaining to this Agreement to the City. In matters relating to the design concept and constructability thereof, the Consultant shall conduct this scope of services under the technical directives issued by the Design Consultant such that the Design Consultant's EOR can provide final certification of the design components at Project Closeout. 3. Provide qualified personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carry out its responsibilities under this Agreement. The personnel shall be qualified by experience and education. Submit in writing to the City for review and approval, the names of personnel proposed for assignment to the project, including a detailed resume for each. The City reserves the right to have Consultant's personnel removed and substituted from the project, if the employee's conduct or performance is detrimental to the project. The City reserves the right to request periodic rotation of field personnel. 4. The Consultant shall furnish the City with a Quality Assurance Plan within 15 calendar days after the award of this agreement. The QA Plan shall detail the procedures, evaluation criteria, and instructions of the Consultant's organization for providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Significant changes to the work requirements may require. the Consultant to revise the QA Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to keep the plan current with the work, requirements. 32 The Plan shall include, but not be limited to: • Consultant's QA Organization and its functional relationship to the part of the organization performing the work under the Agreement. The authority, responsibilities and autonomy of the QA organization shall be detailed as well as the names and qualifications of personnel in the quality control organization. • Methods used to monitor and achieve organization compliance with Agreement requirements for services and products. • Outline the types of records which shall be generated and maintained during the execution of the QA program. • Methods used to control subconsultant and vendor quality. • An officer of the Consultant firm shall certify that the inspection and documentation was done in accordance with specifications, plans, City standards, and City's procedures. • Maintain adequate records of the quality assurance actions performed by the organization (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing services and products under this Agreement. All records shall indicate the nature and number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found, and the corrective actions taken. 5. Provides assistance in preparing for arbitration hearings or litigation that occurs during the Agreement time in connection with the construction project covered by this Agreement. 6. Provide qualified engineering witnesses and exhibits for arbitration hearings or litigation in connection with the Agreement. 7. Provide services determined necessary for the successful completion and closure of the Construction Contract. 8. Provide Post construction claims review — The Consultant shall analyze the claim, engage in negotiations leading to settlement of the claim, and prepare and process the required documentation to close out the claim. 9. The Consultant may be asked to provide all or some construction engineering and inspection services including inspectors, construction managers and/or construction administration staff for City Right -of -Way construction projects. RFC) 2017 -028 -KB 33 APPENDIX D I MI BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS 0=7-7 PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 34 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two (2) additional one (1) year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. APPENDIX E ori MAiV\ BEACH Insurance Requirements R F Q No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RF 2017 -028 -KB 36 /\/\ 1 ,L tv\ BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements" of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 each occurrence - owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability - $ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: _ Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 _ Fire Legal Liability $ .00 ® Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 _ Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty (30) days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 37 APPENDIX F AM BEAC Contract RFQ N o . 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS R� 017 8-K PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 38 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017 -028 -KB DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RFQ 2 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 41 ARTICLE 2. !.ASIC SERVICES 46 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 50 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 52 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 52 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 53 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 54 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 55 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 55 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT, 55 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 57 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 57 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 58 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 58 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 58 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 59 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 63 SCHEDULE B 65 SCHEDULE C 67 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 68 ATTACHMENT B 69 ATTACHMENT C 70 RFC 2017-028-K7- 40 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS -NEEDED -BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and , a corporation having its principal office at (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for, Qualifications No. 2014-346-YG for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As -Needed -Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on , the City Commission approved Resolution No. _ , respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Cohsultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions, used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. RF e •1 • : -KB 41 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsuitants FfFQ20777-28KB 42 acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design -builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. 717717778 -KB VIIII1111111111111, MINN 43 DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance - oriented drawings or specifications of a design -build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design -build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design -build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design -build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and ail other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, Toss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub -contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 44 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the alt representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A — Consultant Service Order Schedule B — Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C —Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall: be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. RFQ 017 45 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further describedin the Consultant Service_Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and 7. 8 -KB 46 Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion .of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In 7777717777-77"- 47 addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re -performance of any non- conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re -performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re -performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re -performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked -up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to RF e • 1 --0 -KB 48 promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project, Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without .the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFOR , ANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. R -0 -KB 49 2,18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance req uirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from ,the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and R-77-77-7 -K 50 acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7,1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project. Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission 8 -KB 51 on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 7 -Q771 -777e -KB 52 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City -Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City -requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re -bidding, or re -negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re -bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre -Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as -built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). 77 1- -K 53 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof,' as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified: Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 54 category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"}), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude. any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re -use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its RFQ 1 7-• :- B 55 performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. RRFQ -028-KB 56 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 2. 7-028-K 57 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: -8-KB 58 City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Attn: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami -Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsuitant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 59 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration, 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent Jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by, its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. R 17- 28- B 60 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. FQ 2• • :-KB 61 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest CONSULTANT: Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name 7 -C7 -7-1777-7B 62 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND RF • l • 8 -KB 63 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of. Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2017 -028 -KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Original Service Order Amount: $ Days Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: $ Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator -Director Date RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 64 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services* $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. RF• • l -•2: -KB 65 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 66 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 67 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 11'1=0177 -KB 68 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) RF N • •2: 69 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 70 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 46 Detail by Entity Name Page 1 of 3 Department of Sate / Division of Corporations / SearcRecords / Detail By Document Number / 7,A1�m��^-~°� Detail by Entity Name Florida ProfiCorporation CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC Filing Information Document Number M17373 FEI/EIN Number 65-0013869 Date Filed 06/27M985 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 03/21/2001 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Changed: 04/02/2001 Mailing Address 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL3O316 Changed: 03/02/2000 Registered Agent Name &Address GIORDANO, DENNIS J 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Name Changed: 04/02/2001 Address Changed: 03/02/2000 OfUuer8DireotorDotai( Name & Address Title PCEOD kt+n �«�orr� m,n�' n,o+n�� 'y7' �/7l�7Al7 ...�p�,,"""~.^..�"""°CI.0��/1DOO!2�/(�O[D0[8I .^^��O�CD/��8�CO1t�SV�Cl)�TDU.lDq... ',~^,�.^. Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 3 GIORDANO, DENNIS J 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Title V EICHNER, SHELLEY 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Title V KENNEDY, KARL 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Title V COOK-WEEDEN, TAMMY 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Title Secretary HOPKINS, DAWN 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Title V WATTS, STEVE 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Title VT GIORDANO, CHRIS 1800 ELLER DR STE 600 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2015 01/14/2015 2016 01/04/2016 2017 01/10/2017 Document Images 01/10/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/04/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format View image in PDF format http ://search. sunb iz. org/Inquiry/CorporationS earch/S earchResultDetai l?inq... 9/21/2017 Detail by Entity Name Page 3 of 3 05/07/2015'--AMENDEDANNUAL REPORT 01/14/2015 --ANNUAL REPORT 12/22/2014 --AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 10/30/2014 --AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 03/20/2014 --AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 01/09/2014 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/04/2013 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/24/2012 --ANNUAL REPORT 03/15/2011 --ANNUAL REPORT 02/17/2010 --ANNUAL REPORT 02/25/2009 --ANNUAL REPORT 02/21/2008 --ANNUAL REPORT 04/23/2007 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/20/2006 —ANNUAL REPORT 01/19/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 07/02/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/27/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT 03/13/2002 --ANNUAL REPORT 04/02/2001 --ANNUAL REPORT 03/20/2001 --Amendment 03/02/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT 02/24/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/27/1998 --ANNUAL REPORT 02/10/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT 01/29/1997 -- NAME CHANGE 02/06/1996 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/25/1995 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF Format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image In PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image In PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View Image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format Honda Department of State,'.nne;a >f orate hap ://search..sunbiz. org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/S earchResultDetail?inq... 9/21/2017 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' Electronic PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION FIRMS RFQ# TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS 2017 -028 -KB Prepared CITY OF MIAMI BEACH For: Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 Due Date/Time: April 14, 2017 3:00 P.M. MIAMI BEACH CITY HAIL 1) COVER LETTER & MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CE[ SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS Building Code Seryices Coastal Engineering Cade Enforcement Construction Engineering and Inspection Construction Services Contract Government Data Technologies and Development Emergency Management Services Engineering Environmental Services Facilities Management Indoor Air Quality Landscape Architecture Municipal Engineering Planning Public Administration Redevelopment and Urban Design Surveying and Mapping Traffic Engineering Transportation Planning GSA Contract Holder 1800 Eller Drive Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 954.921.7781 phone 954.921.8807 fax www.cgasolutions.com Calvin, Giordano u Associates. Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOILITION SrN April 7th, 2017 City of Miami Beach 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RE: Construction Engineering & Inspection - RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB Professional Construction, Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Firms to Provide Various CEI Services on an "As Needed" Basis Calvin Giordano and Associates, Inc. (CGA) is excited to present the City of Miami Beach with our team of highly qualified and experienced Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) professionals for your consideration on RFP number 2017 -028 -KB CEI Services City Wide Construction Projects on as -needed basis. We have assigned a proven leader to manage this contract, Mr. Moe Mabrouk, PE who will serve as your direct contact and will lead our proposed team of qualified and experienced professionals to successfully provide CEI services on your construction and utility improvement projects and help you complete each project within time and budget. The scope under this Consultant Construction Engineering and Inspection contract is to provide The City of Miami Beach with services required for contract administration on citywide construction projects. The selected firm will provide CEI services under a continuing contract as authorized by individual Task Work Orders (TWO) for individual projects on "as - needed" basis. Each Task Order will include the specific scope for the project and a fee schedule individually agreed upon by the consultant and the City. The Construction Engineering & Inspection Division (CEI) was launched by Calvin, Giordano & Associates in 2002. Our municipal experience in South Florida is enviable as we are currently serving or previously served as consultants to many municipalities including Miami Beach, Miami Gardens, Miami -Dade County, Islamorada, Marathon, Key West, West Park, Weston, North Lauderdale, Lauderhill, Sunny Isles Beach, Pembroke Pines, Miramar, Hollywood, Davie, Dania Beach, West Palm Beach, Riviera Beach, Lake Park, Lantana, West Palm Beach, Oakland Park, Parkland, Broward and Palm Beach Counties. CGA also provides CEI services on many successful projects to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) especially in District Four and District Six. CGA also serves as the district consulting engineer to the South Broward Drainage District and the South Broward Hospital District. As with all our projects, we will focus on quality construction practices, approved FDOT, City and County construction methods, quality control, public awareness, safety, early stakeholders coordination, timely project delivery and accurate documentation of the project improvements. CGA's response will highlight our firms' experience with CEI services projects within City/County/FDOT right of ways. We are prepared to exceed your Project Manager's expectations; we will strive to keep the Project Manager apprised of all project related issues that may affect timely and cost effective completion. We anticipate having ample resources to assist the City of Miami Beach with this important CEI contract, and we are 100% committed to successfully completing all the projects that will fall under this contract on time and within budget. Our promise to you is that the City will be a top priority. 2 FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH PORT ST. LIJCIE HOMESTEAD TAMPA / CLEAHWATER JACKSONVILLE ATLANTA The CGA CEI approach is to assign the right staff with the required skills to meet the demands of the project, contractor and client. For this contract, we have proposed Mr. Moe Mabrouk, PE as the contract manager who has both recent FDOT and Municipal experiences. Moe is an ex FDOT Project Manager and Assistant Construction Resident Engineer. He is a highly qualified and experienced SPE with 9 years of construction experience. He worked on over 45 highly complex construction projects with FDOT that included the construction & rehabilitation of 30 bridges, & was able to meet the Department's goals 100% of the time. Moe has also extensive FDOT funded project experience as he worked on LAP & JPA projects while working for the Department. He also worked on FDOT funded projects as a consultant for many local agencies like the KEMP Channel Bridge Project, the $15 M bid pack 9 drainage and roadway improvements projects for Oakland Park, and the MLK Blvd. roadway and lighting improvement project with the City of Pompano Beach. With FDOT, Moe worked on high profile projects like the I -95/I-195/1-395 bridge rehabilitation grouping that included the rehabilitation of 14 bridges, the $75 M I-95 rigid pavement replacement grouping in Miami (Davis Productivity Award- Saving $2 M to tax payers), the 1-95 mobility project and the I- 95 HOV lane project in Palm Beach. He also worked on projects like the Tequesta Drive roadway & bridge reconstruction project (Distinguished Service Award), The 57th Ave grouping that included 5 bridges (Davis Productivity Award), the Alton Road reconstruction project in the heart of South Beach, the Lake Worth roadway improvements project (Davis Productivity Award), the US -1 improvements project in the heart of Downtown Boca Raton (FTBA Best in Construction -Community Awareness Award), and the Glades road project in Boca Raton (Excellence in Paving Award). Moe's institutional experience will bring a great value to the team on this project. Moe will lead a team of highly skilled professionals who have extensive experience working with Municipal agencies on roadway and bridge projects that included pile installation, environmental coordination, drainage improvements, utility relocations, earthwork, ADA, concrete, paving, signing & pavement markings. In order to successfully administer this project, the following skills are crucial for the CEI Team to develop and maintain good working relationships with project stakeholders: Leadership: Strong management, engineering and technical skills as well as experience managing roadway and bridge FDOT funded construction projects. Communication: Effective communication skills and a demonstrated ability to work with the community, as well as build public support for the project through close and frequent communication with all stakeholders. • Prior to construction, a Public Information Meeting will be held where the public will be invited to ask questions about the construction schedule and process. The contractor will be required to present the Construction Schedule prior to that meeting. • Proper notifications and advanced notices will be provided to all stakeholders, residents and business owners in advance of any construction activities. • Proper access will be maintained to the residences, businesses and pedestrians at all times. Coordination: Diligent coordination among all project stakeholders including utility owners is essential in order to maintain the project schedule, minimize construction impacts, and deliver the project within budget and time. We have developed a coordination plan that will be discussed later within this letter, specific to this project to ensure proper coordination implementation. CGA is familiar with the expectations of the City and will ensure the completion of each project safely, with the highest quality, within time and budget. CGA has extensive experience managing similar projects for local agencies as well as the FDOT. The team will also work diligently to minimize the construction impacts to the City residents. We will meet and coordinate the 3 construction activities with representatives all stakeholders accordingly. We will use our extensive experience managing bridge and roadway projects to ensure the timely submittal of documentation. CGA's office located at 10800 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 950 in the City of Miami will be the main office for this contract. We appreciate your consideration of our qualifications, as well as the opportunity to provide professional services to the City of Miami Beach. Sincerely, Dennis Giordano President B USINESS STRUCTURE, w . Business Le: al Status ? Cor 'oration OFFICERS DIRECTORS AND President Dennis . Giordano Company Name Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 Senior Vice President Shelley Eichner, AICP Phone/Fax (954) 921-7781 / (954) 921- 8807 Vice President Karl Kennedy, PE Website Address www.calvin-aiordano.com CEI Director Mohamed Mabrouk, PE Date Incor • orated une 27, 1985 Director's # 786 485-5200 State Incor • orated Florida E-mail Mmabrouk@c:asolutions.com Authorized in Florida 1937-M.E. Berry & Associates, Inc. TIN # 65-0013869 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab 1 1.1 Cover Letter 2 Table of Content 5 1.2 Response Certification, Q&A & Requirements (Appendix A) 6 1.3 Minimum Qualification Requirements 19 Five (5) References 19 Tab 2 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 2 2 Five (5) Similar Projects 23 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team 26 Organizational Chart 2 6 Team Resumes 33 2.3 Financial Capacity 86 Tab 3 Approach and Methodology 96 Tab4 Other Information 108 Certificate of Insurance ..109 Required Licenses / Certifications 110 5 Calvin, Giordano Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL S O L U T I O N b' 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT (APPENDIX A) Please see following pages for Statements of Qualifications Certification, Questionaire & Requirements Affidavit CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED" BASIS 6 APPENDIX A m MAMBEACH Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017 -028 -KB 16 Solicitation No; 2017 -028 -KB Solicitation Title; PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CE1) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS Procurement Contact: Kristy Bada Tel: 305-673-7490 Email: kristybada@miamibeachfLgov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose; The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual, requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information, The City r information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. FIRM NAME: • Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc No of Years in Business; 80 No of Years in Business Locally: 80 OTHER NAME(S) PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS; None FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS (HEADQUARTERS): 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600 CITY: Fort Lauderdale STATE; Florida ZIP CODE: 33316 TELEPHONE NO,; 954-921-7781 TOLL FREE NO.; N/A FAX NO.; 954-021-8807 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 10800 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 950 CITY; Miami STATE; Florida ZIP CODE: 33161 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT; Dennis J. Giordano ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.; 954-921-7781 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: marketing@cgasolutions.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. 65-0013869 ' -KB I 7 8 1, Veteran Owned Business. Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES v/ NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran -owned business or a service -disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government, as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2, Conflict Of Interest. M Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach, Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates NOT APPLICABLE 3, References & Past. Performance, Proposer shall submit at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name & Title, 3) Address, 4) Telephone, 5) Contact's Email and 6) Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. Please refere to Tab 2 4, Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non erformance by an +ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s), 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2.487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring thatall applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their. Proposals, in the event of such non-compliance, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub -consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation, For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity hes contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach, None 6, Code of Business Ethics, Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request, The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of Interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt, as required In the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www,miamibeachfl,gov/proouremenu/, Q • 17 -028 -KB 18 9 7. Living Wage, Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time; Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement, the hourly living wage rates listed below; Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13 (October 1, 2012), the hourly living rate will be $11.281hr with health benefits, and $1.2.02/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) Miami/Ft, Lauderdale, issued by the U.S, Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent (3%), The City may also, by resolution, elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines It would not be fiscally sound to implement same (in a particular year). Proposers' failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www,miamibeachfi.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners, When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over $100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach, A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ,/ YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with (same or opposite sex) domestic partners* or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance, . ........_ BENEFIT ..............._... Firm Provides for Employees with Spouses Firm Provides for Employees with Domestic Partners Firm does not Provide Benefit Health X X X X Sick Leave Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X_ X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance, To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached) with all necessary documentation. Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. FQ 201 - 8 -KB 19 10 9. Public (Entity Crimes. Section 287,133(2)(a), Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time, states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor fist foltowtng a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided In s, 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required, By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287,133, Florida Statutes, and certifies It has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10, Non -Discrimination, Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990, the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and wit not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a) of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from, or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital or familial status, age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11, Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi, Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states., SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016.29375.. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article, with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices, and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance, set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain In full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13, Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e -procurement system, PublicPurchase,com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuantto this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. If a Initial to Confirm Recut Initial to Confirm Receipt Initial to Confirm Receipt. . Addendum 11 .- Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 ►` Adgendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 2 1 -O 8-K 20 11 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTIO The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the "City") for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation, or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this soficrtatdon, either before or after issuance of an award, shall be without any liability or obligation: on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications, and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation, as it deems appropriate and in Its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, partners and employees, as requested by the City in its discretion. The Information contained herein Is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete. The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation Is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation, the selection and the award process, or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer, and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof. Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications, This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only, and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties. Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason, or for no reason, without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government -in -the -Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law, All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications, the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought In such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true, accurate and complete, to the best of its knowledge, information, and belief, Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained In the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdictionwhich imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City, In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it Is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shalt be governed by and construed In accordance with the Taws of the State of Florida, RFQ 2017028 -KB 21 12 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained In the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer 's Authorized Representative: Dennis J. Giordano Signature of Pr. kser's Authoriz epresentative: Title of Proposer 's Authodzed Representative: President State of FLORIDA Countyv of ' 0 L.:C. • of 1 Nsscc:. tt. , a corporation, the said corporation by authority of instrument to be its voluntary act and 7r -a-7-7-77-=3- Date March 24, 2017 On this 2-(-1 day of d , 201:1, personally appeared before mei,,,, who stated that (s)Sls the P_ - and that the instrument was signed in behalf of its board of directors and acknowledged said deed. Before me: No ary Public for the State o FI Arida My Commission Expires: C:2--�t 8 RL., j 22 13 Calvin, Giordano & .Associates, inc. @XCE PrlONAL SOLUTIONS" I. STATEMENT OF POLICY Code of Ethics Policy It is essential to the proper conduct and operations of Calvin Giordano & Associates, Inc. (CGA or "Company") that employees be independent and impartial; and that when such employees are serving in governmental positions as public officers and/or as governmental or Company representatives, that such positions are not used for personal gain or in any other manner which raises a potential, perceived or actual conflict of interest. The public interest, as well as the Company's reputation, requires that CGA establish standards for the conduct of all CGA employees, regardless of whether such employees serve in the public or private sector, to avoid situations where conflicts of interest or unethical behavior may exist or arise. It is the intent of this policy to implement these objectives of protecting the integrity of CGA and its governmental clients, and of facilitating the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel by prescribing restrictions against conflicts of interest without creating unnecessary barriers to public service. This policy provides for transparency in CGA's Exceptional Solutions and services, and to otherwise increase the public's confidence that the highest standards of conduct are practiced in relation to all vendors/customers and potential vendors/customers of CGA and its governmental services contracts. One aspect of this policy is referred as the "No Gift Policy," which is intended to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest when doing business with vendors/customers, subcontractors, subconsultants, and lobbyists or their representatives. The "No Gift Policy" prohibits gifts of any kind, regardless of value, to any CGA employee in connection with or related to the employee's position with the Company, and/or directly or indirectly related to the services provided by CGA. In the event such a gift is received, employees are required to return the gift whenever feasible and when not feasible the gift must be reported immediately to the CGA Human Resources Department. This code shall serve not only as a guide for the official conduct of CGA employees, but also as a basis for discipline of those who violate the provisions of this policy. It is further declared to be the policy of CGA that employees who serve as public officers under a Governmental Services contract, are considered agents of the people and hold their positions for the benefit of the public. They are bound by all state, municipal, and other local government rules of ethics and conduct to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the State Constitution and to perform their duties efficiently and faithfully and in compliance with federal, state and local laws. Accordingly, CGA employees who serve as public officers must be familiar with, and abide by any and all ethics or other rules of conduct particular to their positions, including but not limited to those provisions of Title X, Chapter 112, Florida Statutes, "Public Officers and Employees; Part 111: Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees," which pertain to the administration of their duties. Such officers and employees are bound to observe, in their official acts, the highest standards of ethics consistent with this code regardless of personal considerations, recognizing that promoting the public interest and maintaining the respect of the people in government must be of foremost concern. II. DEFINITIONS A, Breach of the public trust means a violation of a provision of the State Constitution or this policy which establishes a standard of ethical conduct, a disclosure requirement, or a prohibition applicable to public officers or employees in order to avoid conflicts between public duties and private interests. Revised 3/2015 14 B. Business associate means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with a public officer, public employee, or candidate as a partner, joint venture, corporate shareholder where the shares of such corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange, or co-owner of property. C. Business entity means any corporation, partnership, limited partnership, proprietorship, firm, enterprise, franchise, association, self-employed individual, or trust, whether fictitiously named or not, doing business in this state. D. Conflict or conflict of interest means a situation in which regard for a private interest tends to lead to disregard of a public duty or interest. E. Corruptly means done with a wrongful intent and for the purpose of obtaining, or compensating or receiving compensation for, any benefit resulting from some act or omission of a public servant which is inconsistent with the proper performance of an individual's public duties. F. Gift, for purposes of this policy, includes that which is accepted by, paid or given to an employee or for the employee's benefit, for which equal or greater consideration is not given within 30 days, including: 1, Real property. 2. The use of real property. 3. Tangible or intangible personal property (i.e. food, candy, event tickets, not limited to dollar value) 4. The use of tangible or intangible personal property. 5, A preferential rate or terms on a debt, loan, goods, or services, which rate is below the customary or market rate and is not either a government rate available to all other similarly situated government employees or officials or a rate which is available to similarly situated members of the public. III. POLICY AND WORK RULE SOLICITATION OR ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS.— No CGA employee, including employees of CGA serving in a Governmental capacity, or acting as a public officer providing Governmental services in his or her official capacity, shall solicit or accept anything of value to the recipient, including a gift, loan, reward, promise of future employment, favor, or service, not limited by dollar value; based upon any understanding that the service CGA provides, official action, or judgment of the public officer, would be influenced thereby. To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, CGA employees shall not solicit or accept gifts, loans, or any other benefit of any kind, regardless of value, from any actual or potential client, vendor, customer, contractor, subcontractor, consultant, or subconsultant of CGA. CGA employees shall further avoid soliciting or accepting money from any other CGA employees, regardless of position, for an employee's personal benefit, where there is a potential for such other employees to feel pressured or coerced to provide such money. UNAUTHORIZED COMPENSATION.— No CGA employee or family member of the CGA employee, including employees of CGA serving in a Governmental capacity, or acting as a public officer providing Governmental services in his or her official capacity; shall, at any time, accept any compensation, payment, or thing of value when such employee with the exercise of reasonable care, should know, that it was given to influence any action in which the employee was expected to participate in his or her official capacity in breach of the public trust. Revised 3/2015 15 MISUSE OF POSITION, — No CGA employee, including employees of CGA serving in a Governmental capacity, or acting as a public officer providing Governmental services in his or her official capacity shall corruptly use or attempt to use his or her official position or any property or resource which may be within his or her trust, or perform his or her official duties, to secure a special privilege, benefit, or exemption for himself, herself, or others; in breach of the public trust. DISCLOSURE OR USE OF CERTAIN INFORMATION, -A current or former CGA employee, including employees of CGA serving in a Governmental capacity, or acting as a public officer providing Governmental services in his or her official capacity, may not disclose or use information not available to members of the general public and gained by reason of his or her official position, for any improper purpose or for personal gain.. CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT OR CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP,— No CGA employee, including employees of CGA serving in a Governmental capacity, or acting as a public officer providing Governmental services in his or her official capacity, shall have or hold any employment or contractual relationship with any business entity or any agency which is subject to the regulation of, or is doing business with, an agency of which he or she is an officer or employee, excluding those organizations and their officers who, when acting in their official capacity, enter into or negotiate a collective bargaining contract with the state or any municipality, county, or other political subdivision of the state; nor shall any CGA employee have or hold any employment or contractual relationship that will create a continuing or frequently recurring conflict between his or her private interests and the performance of his or her public duties or that would impede the full and faithful discharge of his or her public duties. This shall not prohibit an employee from practicing in a particular profession or occupation when such practice by persons holding such public office or employment is required or permitted by law or ordinance. CGA recognizes the right of employees to engage in activities outside of their employment which are of a private nature and unrelated to our business. However, the employee must disclose any possible conflicts so that CGA may assess and prevent potential conflicts of interest from arising. If an employee has any question whether an action or proposed course of conduct would create a conflict of interest, he or she should immediately contact the HR Department. Employees are required to obtain written approval from their supervisor before participating in any outside work activities. Approval may be granted unless the activity conflicts with CGA's interest. If CGA determines that an employee's outside work interferes with performance or the ability to meet the requirements of CGA as they are modified from time to time, the employee may be asked to terminate the outside employment if he or she wishes to remain with CGA. From time to time, CGA employees may be required to work beyond their normally scheduled hours. Employees must perform this work when requested. In cases of conflict with any outside activity, the employee's obligations to CGA must be given priority. Employees may not perform work oh outside employment during CGA working hours. Employees may not use CGA personnel, vehicles, supplies, equipment, or communication systems to conduct the activities of the outside employment. Employees are hired and continue in CGA's employ with the understanding that CGA is their primary employer and that other employment or commercial involvement which is in conflict with the business interests of CGA is strictly prohibited. The purpose of this policy is to protect employees from any conflict of interest that might arise. A violation of this policy will result in immediate and appropriate discipline, up to and including immediate termination. Revised 3/2015 16 CODE OF ETHICS POLICY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read the Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.'s Code of Ethics Policy, and understand that I must abide by the policy as a condition of initial and/or continued employment, and any violation may result In disciplinary action up to and including discharge, in the sole discretion of the Company. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THE CODE OF ETHICS POLICY AND RELATED PROVISIONS DO NOT ALTER THE "AT WILL" NATURE OF MY EMPLOYMENT OR OTHERWISE CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT FOR EMPLOYMENT FOR A SPECIFIED DURATION. SIGNATURE DATE WITNESS DATE Revised 3/2015 17 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUTSIDE -WORK ACTIVITIES (Second & Self -Arranged Jobs) Employees shall not accept employment with, act, or render services to, any business or endeavor, with or without compensation, which competes with pr conducts business with CGA. In order to ensure that any outside employment does not conflict with CGA's interests, you must disclose your outside employment to Human Resources and your Manager/Supervisor before you begin any outside employment EMPLOYEE NAME CGA WORK LOCATION AND TITLE PROPOSED OUTSIDE -WORK ACTIVITY/JOB AND TITLE PROPOSED OUTSIDE -WORK ACTIVITY COMPANY AND INDUSTRY APPROVAL YES NO APPROVAL'S SIGNATURE DATE Revised 3/2015 18 °' "visa, Giordano & Associates, Inc. E 'X C E P T I O\I A I. SOLITIO 13 MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Organization Name / Address Project Narne Contact Narne Email Seminole Tribe of Florida / 3107 N SR7 / Hollywood / FL / 33021 BIA Route 1300 (Harney Pond Road) from Flowing Well Road to Reservation Road (CR 721) Roadway Improvements 954.894,1060 Fabian Lefler, PE / Project Manager IT.. ext. 10902 F: N/A CEI Services: Project consisted of the widening of 1.155. gross miles of Bureau of Indian Affairs (BEA) Route 1300 (Harney Pond Road). It involved reconstructing the current 20 foot roadway Role / Scope of Work i to a 33 foot roadway with 8 foot sodded shoulders. As part of the project, sidewalks, signing and pavement marking, ditches and cross drains were constructed, and approximately 6,100 LF of 10" PVC raw water main line below finished grade within the right-of-way. FabianLefler@semtribe,com Dates of Service [start/end] Organization Narne i Address Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] March 2014 - September 2014 City of Oakland Park / 5399 North Dixie Highway, Suite 3/ Oakland Park / FL /33334 Bid Pack 9 - 570 acres (east of Dixie Highway, west of Federal Highway, north of NE 38th Street and south of NE 50th Court) Dincero Akin Ozaydin, PE / Project: Manager dincero@oaklandparkfl.gov T: 954.630,4343 F: 954.229.0568 CEI Services: This project included drainage improvement, water main replacement; sewer force main replacement, rehabilitation of Lift Station B-2, Lift Station #3, Lift Station #4, sidewalk in- stallation, roadway improvements and resurfacing. The drainage improvements included con- struction on struction of roadside swales and underdrains, construction of new stormwater conveyance sys- tem piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing conveyance systems and replacement of existing outfall structures that discharge into the existing interconnected lakes and canals, Construction of roadway improvements on NE 45th Street (aka: Floranada Road) will include the addition of paved shoulders, and eastbound lane widening at the inter- section of NE 18th Avenue. Sidewalk constructiontook place on NE -18th Avenue from NE 45th. Street to Commercial Boulevard, January 2015 - October 2016 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS GEL SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 19 CaKin,, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc, xtit�FxrcrVA SOturrc�;+4s Organization Name Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] Organization Name Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] Organization Name Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] The City of Delray Beach /100 NW 1st Avenue / Delray Beach / FL / 33444 NW 12th Avenue Streetscape / NW 12th Avenue from Atlantic Avenue to MLK Blvd. (NW 2nd Street) Begone Krane / Project Manager krane@mydelraybeach.com T: F:. 561.243.7299 N/A CEI Services: Improvements include roadway resurfacing/reconstruction, swales, pedestrian ramps, sidewalk and driveway improvements, landscaping, street lighting, paving of alleyways, drainage improvements including exfiltration trench and waterma[n design, permitting with FDOT, LWDD and SFMWD and surveying. May 2014 - Construction commencing April 2017 The City of Pompano Beach / 100 West Atlantic Blvd / Pompano Beach / FL /33060 MLK (Hammondville Raod) Roadway [mprovements / Hammondville Road (from Powerline Road to Florida Turnpike) Horacio Danovich / CIP Project Manager Horacio.Danovich@copbfl.com T: I F: 954.786.7834 954.786.7836 CEI Services: Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements including trench, drain installation, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings. January 2016 - Present The City of Pompano Beach / 1201 NE 5th. Ave / Pompano Beach / FL / 33060 SW 36th Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project Anthony Alhashemi / Project Manager Anthony.Alhashemi@copbfl.com T: F: 954,786.7934 954.786.7836 CEI Services: The project improvements include the installation of a sidewalk along the west: side of SW 36th Avenue commencing on the south end of Canal "A" north to Pal n Aire Drive, a pedestrian flashing beacon crosswalk at the intersection of SW 36th Avenue and Gateway Driver storm drainage construction, demolition, utility work, and permanent signage striping. October 2016 - Construction commencing April 2017 STATEMENT OF WORK REQUIRED We acknowledge the Statement of Work that may be provided under the agreement. - CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 20 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REQ No. 2017 -023 -KB 1 VAREOUS GEL SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 21 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. c E fF TIO V 1 C, S O t u T 10 Y 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc, (CGA) is proud to be celebrating 80 years in the Professional Consulting Industry We are excited to present our firms qualifications, experience, staff and personal commitment to the City of Miami Beach, With CGA you will be getting a firm with a proven track record, technical excellence, exceptional project management, reliability, responsiveness and a dedication un -paralleled. Today, CGA provides a broad range of services; including storm water management, grant application services, civil engineering, environmental engineering services, emergency management services, surveying, planning, landscape architecture, coastal engineering, geographic information systems (GIS), transportation/ traffic engineering, data technology, construction management, building code services, and indoor air quality. Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Department of Calvin, Giordano & Associates (CGA) has been providing services in the Transportation industry for over 15 years. CGA strives to ensure our clients' projects are built in accordance with FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, FDEP, Cities, and Counties approved Plans and Specifications. Our larger clients include Florida Department of Transportation District 1, 4, 6 & 7, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and over 32 local municipalities across the state of Florida. CGA is exceptionally prepared to serve as your partner in meeting the challenges you face in cost effectively implementing your "as needed" work program. CGA is a premier governmental service provider in South Florida; that have previously provided services to the Department and numerous municipalities on task work order driven contracts. Project Manager Moe Mabrouk PE has both managed and worked under multiple general services contracts with the Department- our team's management and inspection experiences bring an understanding of your expectations, processes and procedures which will allow our team to eliminate the learning curve on this project. CGA provides experienced Professional Engineers, Project Administrators, Contract Support Specialists, Resident Compliance Specialists, LAP Coordinators, Inspection Staff, Project Managers and Administrative Staff for all facets of Roadway and Bridge Construction Projects. These individuals are state certified with CITY OF MIAMI BEACH the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 637,207 (CTQP certified), in such areas as Drilled Shaft inspections, Pile Driving, American Concrete Institute, IMSA Fiber Optic Inspection, Maintenance of Traffic, Earthwork and Sample Testing, Concrete Testing, Asphalt inspection, Traffic Control, Contract Plans Review, Stormwater Erosion and Sedimentation Control, Nuclear Gauge Safety trained and LAP Certified. These are all measures to ensure Quality Assurance Procedures are maintained for all our construction projects throughout Florida. CGA's CEI Professional Engineering staff also participates in constructability reviews of our design projects, providing valuable and experience input for our future built environment. CGA has completed construction inspection services for roadway, bridge, interstates including I-595, 1-75, the Turnpike and 1-95, streetscape, parks and recreational areas, parking lots, airport expansion projects (including runways, taxiways, airport aprons, and airport terminal facilities), as well as numerous projects that required the inspection ofdock facilities, bulkheads, and piers. The CGA CEI Team has also completed multiple utility projects that included the inspection of sewer mains, manholes, lift stations, pumping stations, sanitary sewer improvements, stormwater drainage improvements, wastewater treatment plants, and utility relocations, We also have experienced Certified Landscape Inspection staff to ensure that all needs of the client are met with one firm and one team. Our sub consultant Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) also has extensive experience on General Assign Contracts identical to this one. PSI is a nationally recognized consulting engineering and testing firm with over 130 years of experience providing integrated services in several disciplines, including geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing and engineering, facilities engineering and consulting, environmental consulting, asbestos management and industrial hygiene. Proposed Team's Similar Experience: In the past 5 years alone, CGA's CEI Department is actively working on a General Assigned Contract with FDOT District 4 for Broward, Palm Beach and the Treasure Coast (Prime) and District Wide Misc. Construction, Engineering and Inspection Contract FDOT District 6 in Miami -Dade (Prime), Recently our CEI department was awarded a Continuing Services Contract with the RPQ No. 2017 -028 -CCB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN AS -NEEDED" BASES 22 Calvin, Giordano Associates, Inc, EXC€PTION At. SOtul1 NS City of Fort Lauderdale (Prime). Since CGA's CEI Department inception in 2002, we have provided administrative management and construction inspection for all engineering/permitted projects for the City of Weston's Capital Improvements (30.0M), the City of Sunny Isles Beach Capital Improvements (36.0M) and Town of Surfside, Our Survey Department has a rotating Continuing Surveying Services Contract with Miami -Dade County. Landscape staff work with the City of Weston on landscape reviews and annual inspections and environmental management. Our landscape inspectors are ISA, LEED and FACE certified. We are a task work order driven service provider who strive to deliver unparalleled services to our clients. Understanding of Scope/Potential Project Types The scope under this "as needed" contact is for adequate management of construction projects by City of Miami Beach for Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services during construction projects. This allows the City the ability to have a rotating list of CEI firms available to provide these services for various City departments to enable the City to effectively and efficiently manage the construction phase of these projects. for contract administration, inspection, and materials sampling and testing. Critical to the success of this contract will be the effective management of the vast amount of resources required to ensure coverage for multiple concurrent task work order management across varied disciplines. In order to accomplish a well -thought out, strategic plan has been developed. Our approach incorporates the concepts of early and open communication with the PM, establishing expectations and detailed personnel planning for availability and qualifications and most importantly the inclusion of City staff in a partnership to ensure we are consistently exceeding your expectations. We have extensive experience managing General Assign Contracts with multiple TWO's at the same time. Our team will use spreadsheets and monthly updates to keep track of the different task work orders and to keep the City staff/assigned Project Manager involved and aware of the contract funds. Because of our diversity, CGA can control the entire process, offering a host of professional services as a one -source partner, or efficiently tackle time -sensitive individual projects, providing customized solutions with handpicked teams of highly experienced professionals. Custom building Exceptional Solutions is the core of our business. Please see five references on Similar Projects Below Organization Name / Address Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] MOT District 4 /3400 W Commercial Blvd /Fort Lauderdale / FL / 33309 C9855 FIN # 228027-8-62-01; Various General CEI Consultant Construction Support D-4 Stacey Sasala / Project Manager StaceySasala@dot.state.fl.us T F: 954.777.4382 954.777.4149 CEI Services: Task Work Order (TWO) General Assigned Contract providing various CCI project staff as needed. Over 25 TWO's have been executed by department since contract award June 2011 - Present CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 23 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. ETTi."7=i)7776777,371 Organization Name / Address FDOT District 6 /1000 NW 111th Avenue / Miami / FL / 33172 Project Name . C9073 FIN # 250711-5-62-05; Districtwide Misc. CEI Insp.ection Services Contact Name Keith McIntosh / Project Manager T: I 305.640.7438 Email Keith.Mclntosh@dot.state.fl.us ! F: 1954,777.4149 CEI Services: Task Wok Orders ('IWO) driven Contract. Tasks assignments to provide experi- enced staff support as needed to perform construction engineering inspection and administra- tive functions that involves multiple projects at the same time, such as districtwide inspection of signalization and lighting. asphalt plant inspection, residency contract support, resident com- pliance support and scheduling. Approximately 10 TWO's have been executed by department since contract award i March 2016 - Present Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] Organization Name / Address Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] City of Weston /17200 Royal Palm Boulevard / Weston / FL / 33326 City of Weston CIP Project (various) Denise Barrett / Director of Communications DBarrett@westonfl.org F: T: 954.385.2000 954.385.2010 Construction Management: Scope of work includes construction administration services for Ivarious capital improvement projects including roadways, parks, the new city hall building, fu- eling station, sewage and drainage pumps stations, electrical inspections SCADA systems, and inspection for all engineering -permitted projects within the City. 2007 - Present CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RQ No. 2017 -02B -KB IVAtUOUS CM SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED" BASIS 24 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc.. FTZ-7717T7 4 A L 5 O L U T I o .N y'° Organization Name / Address Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] Organization Name / Address Project Name Contact Name Email Role / Scope of Work Dates of Service [start/end] Town of Surfside / 9293 Harding Avenue / Surfside / FL / 33154 Town of Surfside Misc. Engineering & Construction Management Services Randy Stokes/ Director of Public Works (various) T: 305.861.4863 305,861,1302 305,861,1302 RStokes@townofsurfsidefl.gov F: Miscellaneous Engineering & Construction inspection Seryices: Ongoing continuing services contract providing general engineering and inspection services. These services include Com- mission meeting representation, development plans review and development review meetings, Right -of -Way permit applications reviews, utility coordination, utility franchise agreement co- ordination, Consent Decree engineering services, and Engineer of Record construction com- pletion certifications and various inspection management. Projects provided under this con- tract included the $23M Town -wide utility infrastructure rehabilitation program (water, sewer, drainage, roadway resurfacing and pump stations improvements) and the Biscayne Island Drainage Improvements. 2011 - Present City of Sunny Isles Beach / 19200 Collins Avenue / Sunny Isles Beach / PL / 33160 Capital Improvements Project (various) Chris Russo crusso@sibfl.net T; F: 305.792.1731 305,792.1763 CEI: CGA has been providing project me agement for Sunny Isles Beach's Capital lmprovrenets Various Projects throughout Sunny Isles. Various tasks CGA has performed are topographic/ hydrographic surveys for permitting and designs, complete civil designs and drainage calcu- lations, complete electrical designs, management of the structural design, management of the hydraulic analysis and management of the environmental mitigation plans and permitting and finally overseeing construction of these projects. 2007 - Present CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 25 Calvin, Giordano & Associates. Inc. EXCEPTONAi 7 LOTIONS' 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSED TEAM Please see Organizational Chart below Calvin, Giordano 5 Associates, Inc. CIII)SA1$011.7110-;1‘ Intertek uittir cooRDINATO SO, StAiwoossr,ot Ude Atmtv,ri, SWOON AND IMAPkING aio,94 Wait,,SM Rosisnotei _Oka SA.1.13.1o14$0.10.4 GEOTLUItLj LARRATORY TFSIINC, ; PE, - ' RESIIJINT COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST t,'cwI 14., CAMS OUOtst 11,N WAR,11111 SENIOR ITS / SiONALEATION itysprcroor taro, RuistA44 Ft41t4 Xathy Inftrri C446,61,1d.ton 4Akunr,atol.., C6,1"1 Rcarimo Armlarutr. "' Ir ,ISII,NALMEION INSPECTOR ArthigfWv-Avo II ; C4111e.,11,,InASAtmelml.,. Organizational Chart Key Staff Members u rr � WWI HMO Pollat Mows ONTRIla MANAGER ISTR mtul °Moe MONO, PE EANWP,1114,4 je===g S4115111114 01'00,York , calm,:1,4 daw,,,MmItni, PROIVCT,1101INISTRATOR 1,1P:1(.40.1A VE pikoNG,„....1,Antoon , CONTRALTSIIPPORESPE0,11,10 e. . Ovid AlvArarla ' , /flint Irverd, H.1,11C CONTRACT SUPPORT SPFCIA LIST WrImart L.:,,,,L(.4,4,Cio,t1.,) AsoctANA,1,3 St NIOR 14SPECTI)11 Alfredtl RiliSt6.A• 11,34,41 hf Kattwintei 4,141..44. INSPECTOR AIDE A• trwrAloolma faiicbt4 SENIOR LANt/SIAPE INSPEETOR (Altnen.15,1, fAt2.41 Hleo 4v -ion, AA, malt co...1.•Asmoutk.,..s 1,11NOSICAPE SPECIALIST (AS NEEDED , 514111611 , c-ilve,CiankrnA Arozo-44, NilfRONSIENT,11. COORDINATOR MAP. LEW ; 04.4AkrocA A ....ewAno.,,, SPECIALIST proo,s,:oft. Please see following pages for individual staff experience CITY OF MIAMI BF,ACH REQ No, 2017 -028 -KB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED" BASIS 26 Ca yin, Giordano 6* Associates, Inc. F. { C E P r 1" -FN S O L U T I O .N S r� . f. +#tr#?r9'� ,�rtfit,i.,,:% t" b 4"9 R�t "r4.1.:+ 7 fR✓ ta✓�1 {riP�ri#�,. ,ar. y•§ti��s7,`Y lNuR11'Af,!.�'r'✓L&%3 �'itSC b "firta1�(*f`st"f1f. <�t ii�Tt'`�d'�'`ltJ4��. Pp?�4�l3,� ,#rIyt.-f�1:.N}'4 f iJ ffii�1s3!"t✓ t l i yp ��., kJi1,Y�tiyG{��'i�:;r-1h��,o,f#�b) r°'yJ�>.s,5� iFT ��4�A•{('32.;f.� �j}y��, lr:ilf s#ft1�-`*,p:`�s,+lrF��J'F',�[f"+i'f9J�4�`;--"rNM�3yeh,w]t i{�t. 5.,x'}fp3#u._`�°'Ttedh".inql,, x!µ ' a #Addy+LA y yt1&�f . •.]iM- �1r Moe Mabrouk, PE 10 Contract Manager / Senior Project Engineer Mr. Mabrouk, previously North Dade Assistant District 6 Resident Engineer and the Construction Project Engineer/ Project Manager in Broward and Palm Beach Counties in FDOT District 4, has a wealth of experience administering„ supervising and managing highly complex TWO driven contracts both on the client side as well as on the CEI Senior Project Engineer role. Mr. Mabrouk is the Contract Manager for both our General Assigned Contract with FDOT District 4 and District Wide Misc. Construction, Engineering and Inspection Contract FDOT District 6 . Moe not only has extensive knowledge in the field both on the client side and consultant side, he also has a Bachelor's of Science and Masters of Science in Civil Engineering from FIU, but also a Master of Science in Engeering Management from FIU. Bob McSweeney, PE 20+ Utility Coordinator Bob has over 20 years' experience in the design, and construction observation / construction administration of public utilities (water mains and services, gravity sewer mains and laterals, force mains and sewage pump stations, reclaimed water mains and services) as well as roadway construction and reconstruction. These projects occurred in new developments, and throughout existing neighborhoods and communities. He is well versed on the challenges of infrastructure replacement projects within developedresidential areas, and the public outreach necessary to communicate the expected impacts to residents, business and property owners, and other stakeholders. Bryan Williams, PE 17 Project Administrator Project Administrator with 17 years of construction experience working with FDOT on projects in Miami - Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Treasure Coast and the Keys. He worked on many highly complex construction projects with FDOT, many of which were projects on limited access roadways in south Florida. He was able to meet the the owners measures consistently. He currently has a Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Miami, Felix Garcia, PE 10 Project Administrator Mr. Garcia has over 10 years experience in the construction field. Mr. Garcia was previously an FDOT District 4 Project Manager prior to becoming a Project Administrator on the CEI side. He is very diverse in his capabilities and brings a wealth of knowledge to our team. Some of his duties have included being responsible for the up keep of contract records, prepared change orders and as - built drawings, processed contractor's payments and reviews and sign offs on inspector's daily reports. He is also a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelor's of Science in Civil Engineering. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No, 2017 -028 -KB j VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 27 Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc_ IEXC PTIONAL SOI.UTION 5' +, 1 ,• ', ,,i,4,4 :,• ,, ' ' 4' Hugo DaSilva, PE 22 Project Administrator Mr. DaSilva has over 22 years of experience in the construction industry. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Florida and Puerto Rico, He has extensive experience on both the contractor side and CEI side. Some construction projects include; Highway, Rail Road, City Parks, Sanitary Trunk Lines, Apartments Developments, Surveying, Microtunneling, Bridge Inspections, Gasoline Stations and FEMA Emergency Projects David Alvarado 26 Contract Support Specialist Mr. Alvarado has been in the Construction and Engineering Fields for a total of 26 years. The last half of his career has been working on FDOT projects, first as an Inspector, then Assistant Contract Support Specialist and currently as a Contract Support Specialist. His beginning career was in the electrical and mechanical field. He has extensive experience working with programs such as; LIMS, EDMS, SharePoint, Virtual Inbox and SiteManager. Nauret Rivera! 22 Contract Support Specialist Ms. Riverol has over 22 years experience in the construction industry. She is a seasoned Contract Support Specialist who has experience on large scale construction projects as well as TWO driven contracts. Alfredo Rauseo, PE 22 Senior Inspector Mr. Rauseo has over 22 years of construction experience and has worked on many high profile roadway projects throughout his career He is cross trained and has worked on highway, roadway, bridge projects throughout South Florida. Alfredo is a Florida PE with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. Bruce Bernard 40+ . . Senior Inspector Bruce Bernard has more than 40 years of construction management experience. After graduating from Broward Community College, Bruce pursued a career in the utility industry. Bruce held multiple positions including the Public Works Director for the Town of Davie prior to joining the CGA Team. He was then appointed the position of Field Services Manager at CGA. Throughout his career, Bruce has managed hundreds of millions of dollars in construction for federal, state, local and private clients. Dave Robbins 37 Senior Inspector Mr, Robbins has more than 37 years of experience in the engineering/construction field, as a draftsman, surveyor and inspector. In his current position as Field Operations Manager, he is involved with water and wastewater plants expansions, as well as lift stations, water and sewer systems, drainage systems and roadways (widening and new), and both active and passive/beach parks. In 1992 and 1993, he worked as a state inspector (thru CGA), writing damage survey reports throughout Dade County with FEMA. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REQ No, 2017-028-10 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 28 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SO LIT 0 NS" CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1111C), No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CET SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED' BASIS 29 Julio Antonio 32 Senior Inspector Mr. Antonio has over 32 years of experience as a Senior Inspector He is also a licensed Contractor and Certified Home Inspector. He recently completed work with Broward County Transportation, overseeing ADA improvements and shelter installations at Bus Stops throughout Broward County. He was also a key Senior Inspector on the $1.25 Billion, 1-595 Expressway Corridor Improvement project and FDOT District 4; Bridge Deck Overlay Project where 13 concrete bridge decks were rehabilitated with an epoxy overlayed. Julio is currently serving as the main senior inspector on the $10 M Bid Pack 9 Stormwater and Utility Improvements project in Oakland Park. Gary Craig 40 Senior Inspector Mr. Craig has over 40 years of roadway and bridge construction experience. He has worked on multiple high profile projects across the state that include 1-595 and the 1-75 grouping. Jason Kattwinkel 11 Inspector Mr. Kattwinkel has over 10 years in the construction industry as an inspector. He has vast experience working on large scale FDOT projects including drainage, roadway, milling and resurfacing, ADA and signalization. Brad Pratts 26+ ITS Senior Inspector Mr, Pratts entire career has been working with signals. He is one of the most knowledgeable and respected ITS inspectors in the business. He comes from the contractor side installing VMS structures, VMS signs, RTMS signs, cameras, traffic signals, street lighting and all facets of pole installation, including but not limited to controller cabinets, service points and microwave installation. Arthur Ramsaran II 10 ITS Inspector Mr. Ramsaran II has over 10 years experience in the construction field. He comes from the contractor side installing mast arms, traffic signals, street lighting and controller cabinets, Erin Sudman 10+ Associate Contract Support Specialist/ Landscape Specialist Ms. Sudman has over 10 years experience in the construction field. She started her career as a landscape designer and currently works on the CEI side as a landscape specialist and associate contract support specailist. She also has vast experience working on TWO contracts and Districtwide Contracts. Samantha Droge-York 7+ Contract Administrator Mrs. York comes to us most recently from FDOT District 4 as a contract administrator. She has vast knowledge of state contracts and contract funds, TWO's and General Assigned Contract Administration. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1111C), No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CET SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED' BASIS 29 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc, E X:1,17EPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' ., -1. '''', k ^ . , ' , , , Steve Watts, PSM 26 Surveyor / Mapper Mr. Watts has 26 years of experience as a surveyor and mapper. Having spent his entire surveying career working in Broward County, he is extremely knowledgeable of the rules, requirements and specifications for completing surveying and mapping projects in the South Florida area. He specializes in architectural and engineering design type surveys, land acquisition, easements, title research, and computer mapping. Michael Mossey, PSM 25 Surveyor / Mapper Mr. Mossey has 25 years of experience in land surveying and mapping in South Florida, He has performed construction, right of way, control, ALTA, and boundary and topographic (both acreage and coastal) surveys. He is knowledgeable in the use of a wide range of state-of-the-art surveying equipment and associated computer technologies. He has extensive experience in field crew supervision, quality control and client relations. Sandra Lee, AICP 20+ Environmental Coordinator Ms, Lee has over 20 years of professional experience and heads up CGA's Environmental Department. In general, Ms, Lee: provides environmental permitting services at the local, state and federal level, coordinates interagency and multi -disciplinary team efforts, provides tree mitigation plans and tree removal permitting services, conducts wetland delineations and wetland functional assessments, designs wetland mitigation areas, provides bidding and construction oversight services for the construction and installation of mitigation areas, provides technical support, environmental resource management and environmental planning services to municipalities, manages field staff conducting wildlife and habitat assessments, imperiled species surveys and compliance monitoring reporting. Patrick Murphy 8 Environmental Specialist II Mr. Murphys experience envolves environmental permitting, project management, project delegation, report writing, wetland jurisdictional determinations, environmental feasibility studies, construction observation, mitigation design, mitigation monitoring, benthic resource surveys, marine turtle lighting surveys and permitting, and permit compliance. Kathy Jeffrey 25 Resident Compliance Specialist Ms. Jeffrey has over 25 years experience, responsible for verification of certified payrolls, DBE tracking, OJT man-hours, labor and EEO interviews, and contractor start-up packages on a Federal Aid rest area and access roadway reconstruction project, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REQ. No, 2017-028-10 1 VARIOUS CE[ SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED' BASIS 30 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. FNCEPTION71 SOLUTIONS m . .e Karen Russell ( 20 Resident Compliance Specialist Ms. Russell has over 20 years of office administrative and secretarial experience with specialized training in FDOT construction office and EEO DBE compliance work. Karen is currently the District Compliance Specialist at the FDOT District 6 office performing audits on ALL CEI projects for EEO Compliance. She also assists and conducts construction contract compliance administration field office reviews for consultant CEI staff and the FDOT residency. David Grasso -O'Brien 10+ Landscape Inspector Mr. Grasso -O'Brien is a certified Florida Landscape Inspector with more than 10 years of experience and a LEED AP. He performs landscape inspections and code enforcement services for various municipalities and brings a wealth of experience in horticultural practices, He will contribute his experience in ensuring that vegetation meets grades and standards and is adequately to survive in demanding harsh environments. Hien Nguyen 10+ Landscape Inspector Ms. Nguyen has a master's degree in landscape architecture and over 10 years of experience in environmental science, botany, and landscape architecture, She is particularly well versed in tropical plant taxonomy, physiology, morphology economic botany, and landscape and tree preservation ordinances necessary elements in providing landscape inspections and code compliance. In addition to being skilled in typical office software programs, she is capable with AutoCAD and Adobe Photoshop. She has been the recipient of numerous awards and has received several grants. Paul Passe, PE, CPM 36 Chief Geotechnical Engineer Mr. Passe has over 36 years of experience in the field of geotechnical engineering and materials testing, 13 of which were spent working directly with the Florida Department of Transportation. He spent four of those years as District Geotechnical Engineer, responsible for assignment of project managers in design and construction, and the other eight as the State Geotechnical Engineer, acting as Senior Reviewer and troubleshooter for projects state wide as well as providing guidance and leadership for geotechnical policy and procedures for the FDOT, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REQ No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASS 31 Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. E P 0-4 A S0 L. LI TPON Please see staff resumes after this sheet CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FIFO, No, 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CE[ SERVICLIS ON AN ''AS -NEEDED" BASIS 32 , 1 Julio De Blas, PE, CWI 16 Regional Engineer • Mr. De Blas has over 16 years experience in the geotechnical field. He is experienced using geotechnical finite element modeling (PLAXIS 3D) for complex geotechnical issues and has implemented it successfully in several projects. His construction materials testing and quality control experience consists of soils -earthwork, concrete and grout, spray fire resistive materials, masonry, and other destructive and non-destructive testing. He also has over 9 years of experience as a structural special inspector for numerous projects and has performed multiple welding inspections (CWI) in accordance with AWS D1.1 both in the field and fabrication shops. Carlos Duque 10 Project Manager- Geotechical Services Mr. Duque has over 10 years of project management experience in the area of geotechnical laboratory testing, soil classification and related construction testing/inspection operations. He has been involved in numerous projects for the public and private sectors including: Miami -County, Various Cities within Miami - Dade County, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (District IV, VI and Turnpike), Port(s) (Miami and Port Everglades), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), School District(s) (Miami -Dade, Broward, Monroe and Palm Beach) etc. Mr, Duque's experience includes coordination, monitoring and evaluation of subsurface explorations, laboratory studies, construction operations and assistance in geotechnical report preparation. Please see staff resumes after this sheet CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FIFO, No, 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CE[ SERVICLIS ON AN ''AS -NEEDED" BASIS 32 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc, E a C G P T I Oi V A L 5 6 L U T I O V S" Mohamed Mabrouk, P.E. Contract Manager/ Senior Project Engineer PROJECT EXPERIENCE JULY 2015 TO PRESENT; Calvin, Giordano & Associates; Director of CEI Operations: Responsible for overseeing the CEI Operation for CGA. Some of the highlighted Projects include: FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (froth NW 29 Streetto NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Improvements under this D/B Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/I-95 From north of NW 29th St (M.P. 4,253) to north of NW 79th St (M.P 7,294) in Miami -Dade County. The project will reconstruct 3,041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact: Joan Fabian, PE., Project Oversite 111 305.968.4921 City of Pompano Beach; SW 36th Avenue Sidewalk Project (from West McNab Road to West Palma Aire Drive); Project FM # 431715-1-58.01 (LAP Funded $628,755.50): The project scope includes the installation of a sidewalk along the west side of SW 36th Avenue commencing on the south end of Canal "A" north to Palm Aire Drive, a pedestrian flashing beacon crosswalk at the intersection of SW 36th Avenue and Gateway Drive, storm drainage construction, demolition, utility work, and permanent signage & striping. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 City of Pompano Beach; MLK (Hammondville Road) Improvements (from Powerline Road to Turnpike) Project FM # 432861-1-58-01 (LAP Funded $2,855,802.00): Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings, Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 FDOT District 4; SRA1A Bridge No, 860011 over Millsboro Inlet; Project FM # 425935-152-01/425935-1-52-02: Improvements include rehabilitation of existing Bascule Bridge over the Hillsboro Inlet. Contact: Yveins Jean-Pierre, PE., Construction Project Oversight CIC 954.940.7611 FDOT District 4; City of Oakland Park; Joint Participation Agreement and Maintenance for State Road 845 (Poweriine Rd) from Prospect Road (M.P 3.063) to State Rcl 870 (Commercial Blvd) (M,P. 3.585); Project FM 4437225- 1-74-01, Contract# ARW58: Improvements consist of irrigation installation. within median, landscape relocation and installation. Contact: Akin Ozaydin, PE., Project Manager 954.630.4343 City of Oakland Park; Bid Pack 9 Infrastructure Improvements; This project includes drainage improvement, water main replacement, and sewer force main replacement, rehabilitation of Lift Station B-2, Lift Station #3, Lift -Station #4, sidewalk installation, roadwayimprovements and resurfacing. Contact: Akin 33 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. EX E P TION.AL. So1LIIN)N *` Mohamed Mabrouk, RE,, Page 2 Ozaydin, RE., Project Manager 954.630.4343 • City of Pompano Beach; MLI< (Hammondville Road) Improvements (from Powerline Road to Turnpike) Project FM # 432861-1-58-01 (LAP Funded): Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings. FDOT District 6; Assistant Resident Engineer at North Miami -Dade: As the Assistant Resident Engineer, Mohamed lead, coached and mentored in-house and CEI teams to successfully manage over 35 highly complex construction projects. Some of the highlighted projects are: • JUNE 2014 -JULY 2015; FDOT District 6; NW 79th Street Roadway Improvements Grouping: Assistant Resident Engineer. The contract included bridge improvements, barrierr wall installation, lighting improvements, signalization improvements, drill shaft installation, signing, pavement markings, and milling and resurfacing. Contact: Ivan Hay, P.E., 305.986.2575; Joan Fabian, P.E., 305.968.3965 • DECEMBER 2013 -JULY 2015; FDOT District 6; NW 57th Avenue Roadway Improvements Grouping: Assistant Resident Engineer. The contract included roadway widening, culvert installation, major utility work, drainage improvements, signalization improvements, signing, pavement marking, and milling & resurfacing. Contact: Ivan Hay, PE., 305.986.2575; Joan Fabian, P.E., 305.968.3965 • AUGUST 2014 -JULY 2015; FDOT District 6; Bridge Rehabilitation Grouping: Assistant Resident Engineer. Assigned as the Project Manager for a grouping that includes 13 projects and 18 bridges. The projects included bridge rehabilitation, painting steel and concrete bridges, repair of structural and concrete members, repair of spalled concrete, repair of piles, cathodic protection, and crack repairs on 18 bridges throughout Miami -Dade County. Contact: Ivan Hay, P.E., 305.986.2575 JULY 2013 -JULY 2015; FDOT District 6; 1-95 Rigid Pavement Rehabilitation: Assistant Resident Engineer Assigned as the Project Manager for this major limited access grouping that includes 6 projects. The contracts include replacement of concrete slabs along Southbound and Northbound 1-95 between the Turnpike and 79th street. Contact: Ivan Hay, P.E., 305.986.2575; Felipe Gonzalez, P.E., 305.401.1438 FDOT District 4; Construction Project Engineer/ Project Manager (Broward and Palm. Beach Counties): Administered, supervised, and managed highly complex construction projects, Some of the highlighted projects are: • MARCH 2013 -JULY 2013; FDOT District 4; Lantana Road Interchange Reconstruction an 1-95: Construction Project Engineer/ Project Manager; The project included reconstructing all 4 on and off ramps at. i-95 and Lantana Road Interchange. The project included the widening of all four ramps, the widening of the Lantana Road Florida. 1 -beam Bridge over 1-95 and CSX railroad tracks, FIB placement, pile foundations, drill shaft foundations, MSE walls, earthwork, lighting, milling and resurfacing. Contact: Deb Ihsan, PE., 954.777.4387 JULY 2012 -JULY 2013; FDOT District 4; 1-95 Interchange Construction at MU Boulevard; Design -Build: Project Manager, TRC Member and RFP Prepares This, ($75 M) project included the addition of a new interchange on 1-95 at FAU Boulevard. The project also include earthwork, lighting, clernucking, 'construction in an environmentally sensitive areas and lane widening on the mainline off -95 from Congress Avenue to Glades Road which included 13 different. Contact: Deb Ihsan, PE., 954.7774387 • JUNE 2012 -APRIL 2013; FDOT District 4; RRR Construction Improvement Project on USI (from.Glades Road to Mizner Road): Construction Project Engineer/ Project Manager; The project included. milling and resurfacing US1, ADA ramp improvements, signalization improvements, drainage improvements, signing and pavement markings improvements. Contact: Scott Burrie 561.719.7713 34 Calvin, Gordano 8, Associates, Inc. zct:rrI0 4Ai SOGuTIONS" Robert McSweeney, P.E. Utility Coordinator SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr, McSweeney's broad background entails extensive experience with civil and environmental engineering firms providing service to both public and private sector clients in Miami -Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties, His experience also involves FDOT utility coordination and construction administration as well a design/consulting for the U.S. Air Force. At CGA, Mr. McSweeney's responsibilities include civil and environmental engineering along with related planning, permitting, design and construction administration, As Director of Quality Assurance, he will help to ensure all projects continue to meet CGA's high standards for quality and constructability. He provides service to both public and private sector clients in and outside the Tri -County area. • PROJECT EXPERIENCE APRIL 2011 -PRESENT; Town of Surfside; Miscellaneous Engineering Services Contract: Town Engineer/Engineer-of:Record, Ongoing continuing services contract providing general engineering services to the municipality. These services include Commission meeting representation, development plans review and development review meetings, Right -of -Way permit applications reviews, utility coordination, utility franchise agreement coordination, Consent Decree engineering services, and Engineer of Record construction completion certifications. Projects provided under this contract included the $23M Town -wide utility infrastructure rehabilitation program (water, sewer, drainage, roadway resurfacing and pump stations improvements) and the Biscayne Island Drainage Improvements. Contact: Joe Kroll, Director of Public Works 305,861,4863 200�B-2009; School Board of Broward County; Eie:rnentary School A (Sunrise, Florida): Engineer -of -Record. New elementary school encompassed design through construction. Complete civil engineering design, permitting, construction inspections and administration services were provided/performed, Improvements included complete site development, paving/grading/drainage systems, potable water/sanitary sewer systems, and pavement marking and signage, A second school, Elementary School Z in the City of Parkland using the same prototype building plan, was designed/ constructed concurrently with this project. Contact: Scim Bays, Construction Project Manager 754.621.4634 JULY 2007 -DECEMBER 2010; Pompano Beach; Miscellaneous Engineering Services Contract: Contract Manager / Engineer -of -Record. Continuing services contract providing general engineering, and surveying and mapping services to the municipality on an as -needed basis. Projects provided under this contract included reclaimed/reuse water main design a.ndconstruction administration, Pompano Beach Sidewalk Construction Program, facility assessment reporting, municipal pier renovation inspections, Sample McDougald House site design, Broward County/ Pompano Beach Branch Library site engineering design, golf course decorative wall design, and bridge and culvert improvements. Contact: Clayton Young, Engineer III 954, 786.402 9 35 Calvin, Giordano & .Associates, Inc. L X C £ P I I a 'NAL SOL. UTI O J S' Robert McSweeney, Page 2 JULY 2007 -DECEMBER 2010; Miscellaneous Engineering/Surveying Services Contract, Deerfield Beach, Florida. Contract Manager/Engineer-of-Record of a continuing services contract providing as needed general engineering, and surveying and mapping services to the municipality on an as -needed basis. Contact: Charles DaBrusco, P.E., 954.480,4269 Projects provided under the contract included: • State Road AIA "S" Curve Phase II Roadway, Utility and Beautification. Project • Intersection. Improvements Design; Goolsby Boulevard and Hillsboro Boulevard • Main Beach Parking Lot Expansion • Cove Shopping Center Parking Lot Redevelopment 2007-009; City of Deerfield Beach; Hillsboro Boulevard (SR 810) Improvements: Engineer-of-Record/Contract Administrator, Project included surveying and engineering design for reconstruction and improvements to 4,800 linear feet of roadway (Hillsboro Boulevard/SR 810) from Federal Highway to SR A1A. Improvements include roadway cross -slope correction, underground utilities adjustments/relocations, drainage improvements, mast arm/ signalization, utility coordination, safety improvements, landscape and streetscape elements, decorative lighting and bid assistance. Contact: Charles DaBrusco, P.E., 954.480.4269 2007-2009; School Board of Broward County; Coconut Creek High School, Deerfield Beach High School and Blanche Ely High School: Engineer -of -Record /Project Coordinator/ Construction Engineering Manager. Multiple stadium enhancement contracts to include all civil engineering and land surveying services for the project, facilitated. through a design/build firm and funded by the School Board of Broward County. Project involvement included complete civil engineering design and permitting associated with the new stadium/bleachers and concession building, football field grading and drainage, running track configuration, high jump and long jump configuration, pole vault and discuss configuration, security fencing, storm water management system, and construction administration/inspection/certification. Contact: Sam Bays, Construction Project Manager 754.621,4634 2007-2008; Parkland Commons Commercial Development: Engineering Manager. Managed staff for the complete engineering design, platting, permitting and construction administration for a 40 -acre commercial development. Project involved substantial offsite roadway improvements on University Drive, and joint use agreements with the School Board of Broward County, 2007-2008; Broward County; Port Everglades Cruise Terminal 4: Engineering Manager. Engineering design, permitting of a parking lot expansion program. Included resolution of existing drainage inadequacies, overall site utility redesign, upgraded the existing stormwater management system and complete water distribution systems, in addition to the redesign/reconfiguration of the overall parking area. 2007-2008; Town of Davie; Downtown Davie Design, Permitting and Construction Administration: Contract Manager/Engineer-of-Record. Project was a 12 -acre, light density, mixed-use (residential, retail and office development) project in Davie. Project included legal depositions and expert witness testimony towards resolving drainage issues with adjoining property. 2007-2008; Golden Acres Apartments, Pompano Beach, Florida. Contract Manager/Engineer. -of-Record for this affordable housing project with 302 units completed in two phases, Golden Square and Golden Villas. Project tasks included preparation and processing of the site plan, platting, surveying, design and permitting of the water, sewer and drainage systems, roadway design and permitting, utility coordination, and construction administration services. 36 Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. EXCEPi...wOvAL SOLUTIONS" Samantha Droge-York Contract Administrator PROJECT EXPERIENCE JANUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; Districtwide Misc. Contract; C9073; Project FM # 250711-5-62-05: Contract Administrator. Lead Project Manager on current CEL Compliance Support Services Contract, ensures & processes funding for all District 6 CEI Contracts, responsible for submitting ARF Requests, CITS invoices and PCR's submittals, monitors and reviews all staff timesheets and Task Work Orders for status of remaining funds. Contact: Keith E. McIntosh; FDOT CEI Project Manager; 305.640.7438 AUGUST 2015 - DECEMBER 2016;,FDOT District 4; Construction Department; Florida Department of Transportation: Contract Administrator. Lead Project Manager on current CEI Compliance Support Services Contract, lead Project Manager on current Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles Work Zone Traffic Control contracts, ensured & processed funding for all District 4 CEI Contracts, Issued Letter of Authorization (LOA), determined the estimate of funds needed, programed the funding, audit invoices and backups, processed approval on active projects, coordinated with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for estimate approval. Also responsible for reviewing and approving CITS invoice submitted, compiled and uploaded the Monthly Progress Report (MPR), coordinated and scheduled all Technical Review Committee (TRC) meetings, provided all selection documentation to the TRC members and the appropriate Procurement staff, coordinating with the Operations Centers, encumbering and executing the Consultant Acquisition Lockdown Commitment monthly and monitored CEI contract invoices for status of remaining funds. Contact: Stacey Sasaki, FDOT Project Manager 954.777.4382 JUNE 2014 - AUGUST 2015 ; FDOT District 4; Procurement Department; Florida Department of Transportation: Contract Writer. Prepared consultant agreements, including all contract actions such as Supplemental Amendments, Amendments, Time Extensions, Certification of Completion (Closeouts) and Funds Authorization, ensured proper budget was available and secured funds, by taking necessary actions for Federal Funds and State Funds, ensured all necessary contract terms were included appropriate methods of compensation were being applied to each agreement for effective input into CITS. (Consultant Transmittal System), entered and maintained. required information into FACTS Florida Accountability Contract System, PSI, and shared spreadsheets, notified firms with Selection results, entered Consultant Acquisition Plan (CAP) project information and establishedtimeline into the PSI System. Contact: Jessica Rubio; Manager; 954.7774626 NOVEMBER 2014 - FEBRUARY 2015 ; FDOT District 4; Procurement Department; Florida Department of Transportation: Administrative Assistant: Conduct Scope of Services meetings, Oral Presentations and/or Oral Interviews for the acquisition of professional services contracts, Coordinate, schedule and conduct monthly Consultant Presentations, perform review of Consultant Technical Proposals/Certificates from Consultants, responsible for scheduling in the PSI System, maintain and organize the Consultant Selection documents electronically, responsible for records requests, maintained off-site records storage, ordered and maintained all office supplies in My Florida Market Place audit invoices and support documentation before submitted for payment approval, performance grade reports, performed all administrative functions, Training Coordinator and managedtemporary staff. Contact: Jessica Rubio; Manager; 954.777.4626 37 Bryan Williams, P.E. Project Administrator PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano , Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIOAL7--17.71.71-7777 V7" SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER/PROJECT ENGINEER MAY 2015 -PRESENT; City of Oakland Park; Expanded Lloyd Estates Residential and Industrial lmprovements Project: Senior ProjectEngineer. The project boundary is located south of Prospect Road, north of Oakland Park Boulevard, east of Powerline Road and west of Andrews Avenue. This project includes drainage improvements, water main replacement, installation of flood gates, stormwater pump station and a tidal check valve, The proposed drainage improvements include construction of roadside swales, construction of new stormwater conveyance system piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing conveyance systems and construction of new outfall structures that discharge into the Sleepy River. Contact; Akin Ozaydin,PE., Project Manager 954.630,4343 JANUARY 2015 -PRESENT; City of Oakland Park; Bid Pack 9 Infrastructure Improvements: Senior Project Engineer. The project encompasses approximately 570 acres, the project boundaries are east of Dixie Highway, west of Federal Highway, north of NE 38th Street and south of NE 50th Court. This project includes drainage improvement, water main replacement, sewer force main replacement, rehabilitation of Lift Station B-2, Lift Station #3, Lift Station #4, sidewalk installation, roadway improvements and resurfacing. The proposed drainage improvements include construction of roadside swales and underdrains, construction of new stormwater conveyance system piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing conveyance systems and replacement of existing outfall structures that discharge into the existing interconnected lakes and canals. Construction of roadway improvements on NE 45th Street (aka: Floranada Road) will include the addition of paved shoulders and eastbound lane widening at the intersection of NE 18th Avenue, Sidewalk construction will take place on NE 18th Avenue from NE 45th Street to Commercial Boulevard, Contact; John M. Perez, Project Manager 954.630.4479 AUGUST 2014 -JULY 2015; City of Oakland Park; NE 34th Court Improvements (Between NE 2nd Ave and .11th Ave); (LAP); Project PM # 429653.1.58-01 Fed # 8886109A: Senior Project Engineer. This project included installation of storm drain piping and structures, water mains, Infrastructure improvements both in public right- of-way and private property, including landscape, driveways, pavement, sidewalks, fences and other misc. items. Contact: John M. Perez, Project Manager 954.630,4479 MAY 2012 -JULY 2014; Broward County I-Hghway Construction and Engineering Division; Palm Avenue Improvements Project ($8 M): Project Engineer: Construction consisted of roadway widening, concrete sidewalk, new drainage system, traffic signals, irrigation and landscaping, Contact: Richard Tornese, P,E, Director Engineering Broward County 954.577,4579 OCTOBER 2011 -DECEMBER 2013; Broward County Highway Construction and Engineering Division; Bailey Road Improvement Project ($8 M): Project Engineer. Construction consisted of roadway widening, sidewalks, new drainage system, new irrigation and landscaping. Contact: Richard Tornese, PE., Director Engineering Broward County 954.5774579- 38 Calvin, Giordano S Associates, -- ENC'EPTIONAI SOt UTIONS.' Bryan Williams, PE, Page 2 DECEMBER 2005 -DECEMBER 2009; Turnpike Enterprise; Widening of SR 91/Florida's Turnpike from Sunrise Boulevard to Atlantic Boulevard ($97 NI): Senior Project Engineer. Construction of 2 new bridges over the Turnpike, widening of 3 existing bridges, Open Road Tolling (ORT) conversion and miscellaneous roadway improvements. Contact: Pacifico Castillo 954.444.8050 JANUARY 2005 -NOVEMBER 2005; FDOT District 4; Districtwide Emergency Response Consultant; Hurricane Restoration Team: Senior Project Engineer, Work included coordination and tracking of debris removal and traffic signal restoration in Palm Beach County to provide FDOT backup documentation for FHWA and FEMA reimbursement, Contact: Stacey Sasala, Project Manager 561.432,4966 PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR/CONTRACT SUPPORT SPECIALIST JANUARY 2010 -OCTOBER 2011; FDOT District 6; Reconstruction of SR 826/SR836 Interchange ($558 M): Project Administrator. Construction consisted of 40 bridges, MSE walls, traffic signals, high -way lighting, ITS components, new roadways, drainage systems, canal realignment, sound barrier walls and landscaping. Contact: Raj Maheshwari, PE., 305.436.8877 SEPTEMBER 2004 -JANUARY 2005; FDOT District 4; Hurricane Frances and Jeanne Restoration Team; Project Administrator. Coordinated conducted by contractors including debris removal, roadway repair, and traffic signal and signing repair and reconstruction to provide FDOT backup documentation for FHWA and FEMA reimbursement. Contact': Stacey Sasala, Project Manager 561.432.4966 MARCH 2001 -MARCH 2002; Wiles Road Improvements ($4.8 M): Project Administrator/ Contract Support Specialist. Construction consisted of new alignment/new roadway, milling and resurfacing, signing and pavement markings, drainage and signalization. OFFICE ENGINEER / SENIOR ROADWAY ENGINEER/ INSPECTOR JANUARY 2004 -SEPTEMBER 2004; FDOT District 4; General CEI Services Contract: Office Engineer, Performed quality assurance and final estimates reviews for Palm Beach residency construction. Responsibilities included the review of ongoing FDOT projects for adherence to FDOT policies and requirements regarding project documentation for final acceptance by FDOT, Contact: Stacey Sasala, District Manager 954.777,4382 JANUARY 2003 -JANUARY 2004; FDOT District 6; General CEI Services Contract: Senior Roadway Engineer Assigned as assistant to FDOT Lighting and Signalization Coordinator. Responsibilities included performing, coordinating and monitoring lighting and signalization inspections for all District 6 projects including interim and final acceptance inspections, created and maintained a performance tracking system to ensure signal acceptance, performed traffic signal and street lighting plans review for constructability and adherence to FDOT and Miami -Dade County specifications. Contact: Keith McIntosh, PDOT Project Manager 305.499.2408 MARCH 2002 -JANUARY 2003; Miami -Dade County: NW 12th Street (NW 12 Street from NW 107th Avenue to NW 111th Avenue) Roadway Construction: Inspector. Construction consisted of a new roadway, drainage installation, embankment, lime rock base, asphalt paving, street lighting and traffic signal installation. NOVEMBER 2000 -MARCH 2001; SR 826/Palmetto Expressway (from NW 154th Street to the Golden Glades Interchange): Office Engineer. As'signed to the milling and resurfacing portion. Responsibilities included. preparing monthly estimate, tracking and scheduling testing as required by the FDOT testing and sampling guide, maintaining project documentation as required by the FDOT specification for final acceptance (material certification, pay item quantity documentation, material test results), and preparing project documentation for final acceptance. 39 Felix Garcia, P.E. Project Administrator PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOCU TIvl N S" JULY 2016 -PRESENT; City of Pompano Beach; MLK (Hammondville Road) Improvements (from Powerline Road to Turnpike) Project FM # 432861-1-58- 01 (LAP Funded $2,855,802.00): Project Administrator. Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 MARCH 2015 -MAY 2016; MDX SR -112 Open Road Tolling (ORT) Off System Signing; Project Administrator. Project total cost is $3,410,460. The project included installation, replacement and removal of overhead sign panels and sign structures, including two DMS signs, concrete barrier wall removal and installation. Contact: Orlando Sanchez, PE, 305.265-5490 DECEMBER 2014 -MARCH 2015; Seminole Tribe of Florida; Snake Road project BIA Route 1281; Project FM # 415186-3-52-01 ($11.4 M): Project Administrator. Scope of project consisted of re -construction of a 2 -lane arterial with an adjacent multi -use path. Pavement re -construction, milling and resurfacing, installation of drainage system, utility improvements, channel excavation, side street tie-in, lighting, signing, pavement markings installation of emergency signal and landscaping.Contact: Fabian Lefler, P.E., Project Manager 954.894.1060 ext. 10902 AUGUST 2014 -DECEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; Sunrise Bridge Replacement Project; Project FM # 422866-1-52-01: FDOT Project Manager Project scope includes replacement of a low-level bridge and drainage improvements in Broward County. Project duration was 863 days. Project cost was approximately $9,484,806.42 million. Contact: Jeannette Harris, Project Manager 954.540.5473 JULY 2014 -DECEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; SR -7 Widening and Resurfacing Project; Project FM # 227774-1-52-01: FDOT Project Manager. Project scope included adding lanes, reconstruction, signalization, lighting, drainage, ATMS/ITS and pedestrian improvements. Project Cost, $30,674,813.08 'million. Contact: Jeannette Harris, Project Manager 954.540.5473 DECEMBER 2 013 -DECEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; Andrews Avenu e Resurfacing Project; Project FM # 230730.1.52.01: FDOT Project Manager. Scope included adding lanes, milling and resurfacing, drainage improvements, signalization and lighting improvements on Andrews Avenue Extention and Copan's Road. Project lasted 715 days. Contact: Jeannette Harris, Project Manager 954,540.5473 AUGUST 2007 -DECEMBER 2013; FDOT District 4; Broward Operations Center; Varios Projects: Project Administrator. Contact: Jeannette Harris, Project Manager 954.540.5473 April 2013 - March 2014; Pines Blvd. Resurfacing Project; Project FM # 427006-1-52-01: This Hybrid Project scope included milling and resurfacing along Pines Boulevard. 40 Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. C TIONALMO TION Felix Garcia, Page 2 • July 2013 - November 2013; Hollywood Blvd. Signalization Project; Project FM # 428275-1-52-01: Project scope included signalization improvements at N/S 35th Avenue and Hollywood Boulevard. • January 2013 - June 2013; Pines Blvd. High Mast Lighting Project; Project FM # 424496-1-52-01: Project scope included removal and installation of high mast light poles on Pines Boulevard, • July 2012 - May 2013; US -27 Resurfacing Project; Project FM # 423031-1-52-01: This Hybrid Project scope included installation of rigid concrete pavement at approach to intersections, milling and resurfacing, left -turn lane modification, and signalization along US -27. • July 2012 - December 2012; Stirling Rd. at Davie Rd. Signalization Project; Project FM # 426855-1-52-01: This hybrid project scope included extension of left -turn lanes, signalization, and ADA improvements along Stirling Road. • July 2012 - November 2012; Stirling Rd. Signalization Project; Project FM # 427926-1-52-01: This hybrid project scope included closure of median opening at 58th Avenue, extension of left -turn lane, signalization, and minor landscaping along Stirling Rd. • September 2011 - October 2012; Atlantic Blvd. Resurfacing Project; Project FM # 227921-2-52-01: Project scope included curb and gutter realignment, milling and resurfacing, signalization, and minor drainage along Atlantic Boulevard. • March 2010 - February 2011; Sheridan Street Resurfacing Project; Project FM # 416883-1-52-01: Project scope included milling and resurfacing, signalization, lighting, and landscaping along Sheridan Street in Broward County. • August 2010 - October 2010; Thermoplastic/Wet Weather Pavement Marking Project; Project FM # 423016-1-52-01: This Hybrid Project scope included placement of thermoplastic and wet weather pavement markings along US -27, • August 2007 - March 2009; Griffin Road Reconstruction Project; Project FM # 227708-1-52-01: This Hybrid Project scope included bridge culvert construction, milling and resurfacing, sgnalization, lighting, and landscaping along Griffin Road. • January 2008 - March 2008; Griffin Road Signalization Project; Project FM 421261-1-52-01: Project scope included installation of mast arm signals at SW 106th Avenue and Griffin Road. December 2005 - January 2008; FDOT District 4; Broward Operations Center: Professional Engineer Trainee. 18 -month rotation through all divisions within the Department of Transportation including planning, environmental management, design, construction, maintenance, traffic operations and work program. 6 -month Specialization as a Construction Project Administrator at Broward Operations as a Senior PE Trainee. Varying amounts of time spent in each phase with emphasis on gaining experience in each. Contact: Jeannette Harris, Project Manager 954.540.5473 41 Hags DaSilva, P.E. Project Administrator PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. C r E: R t t Ll V A L SOL U T I O N S" FEBRUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (from NW 29 Streetto NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Senior Inspector. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/I-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact: Joan Fabian, P.E., Project Oversite-Ill 305.968.4921 OCTOBER 2016 -PRESENT; City of Pompano Beach; SW 36th Avenue Sidewalk Project (from West McNab Road to West Palm Aire Drive); Project FM # 431715- 1-58-01 (LAP Funded $628,755.50): Project Administrator/Contract Support Specialist. The project scope includes the installation of a sidewalk along the west side of SW 36th Avenue commencing on the south end of Canal "A' north to Palm Aire Drive, a pedestrian flashing beacon crosswalk at the intersection of SW 36th Avenue and Gateway Drive, storm drainage construction, demolition, utility work, and permanent signage & striping. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 MAY 2015 -OCTOBER 2016; City of Oakland. Park; Expanded Lloyd Estates Residential and Industrial Improvernents Project: Senior Inspector / Project Administrator. The project boundary is located south of Prospect Road, north of Oakland Park Boulevard, east of Powerline Road and west of Andrews Avenue. This project includes drainage improvements, water main replacement, installation of flood gates, stormwater pump station and a tidal check valve. The proposed drainage improvements include construction of roadside swales, construction of new stormwater conveyance system piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing.conveyance systems and construction of new outfall structures that discharge into the Sleepy River. Contact: Akin Ozaydin, PE., Project Manager 954.630.4343 JANUARY 2015 -PRESENT; City of Oakland Park; Bid Pack 9 Infrastructure Improvements: Senior Inspector/Project Administrator. The project encompassed approximately 570 acres, the project boundaries are east of Dixie Highway, west of Federal Highway, north of NE 38th Street and south of NE 50th Court. This project included drainage improvement, water main replacement, sewer force main replacement, rehabilitation of Lift Station B-2, Lift Station #3, Lift Station #4, sidewalk installation, roadway improvements and resurfacing. The drainage improvements included construction of roadside swales and underdrains, construction of new stormwater conveyance system piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing conveyance systems and replacement of existing outfall structures that discharge into the existing interconnected lakes and canals. Construction of roadway improvements on NE 45th Street (aka: Floranada Road) will include the addition of paved shoulders and eastbound lane widening at the intersection of NE 18th Avenue. Sidewalk construction took place on NE 18th Avenue from NE 45th Streetto Commercial Boulevard. Contact: Akin Ozaydin, PE., Project Manager 954.630.4343 42 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. I 0 V A ;l S O t- U t 1 C) r1 S` Hugo DaSilva, P.E., Page 2 APRIL 2014 -JULY 2015; City of Oakland Park; NE 34th Court Improvements (Between NE 2nd Ave and llth Ave); Project FM # 429653-1-58-01 Fed # 8886109A; Senior Inspector / Project Administrator. This project included installation of storm drain piping and structures, water mains. Infrastructure improvements both in public right-of-way and private property, including landscape, driveways, pavement, sidewalks, fences and other misc. Items. Contact: John. M. Perez, Project Manager 954.630.4479 MARCH 2014 -SEPTEMBER 2014; Seminole Tribe of Brighton; BIA Route 1300 (Harney Pond Road) from Flowing Well Road to Reservation Road (CR 721), BIA Project # S5342203: Senior Inspector. Project consisted of the widening of 1.155 gross miles of Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Route 1300 (Harney Pond Road). The purpose of these improvements were to improve drainage along the roadway. Improvements consisted of replacement of 6,100 LF of water main, grading of existing swales and cross drains, reconstructing the current 20 foot roadway to a 33 foot roadway with 8 foot sodded shoulder, driveway reconstruction, signing and pavement marking, new pedestrian signage, construction of new sidewalks, addition of handrails and gravity walls, in some locations and relocation of existing power poles (by others. Contact: Fabian Lefler, P.E., Project Manager 954.894.1060 ext. 10902 JUNE 2014 -OCTOBER 2014; City of Miami Gardens; Rolling Oaks Park Trail Improvements; Project FM # 420914-2: Project Engineer. The improvements under this contract consist of site preparation, earthwork, construction of pedestrian asphalt pathway, lighting, outdoor exercise equipment, sign installation and pavement markings per construction drawings. Contact: Anthony Smith, Project Manager 305.409.7350 JANUARY 2013 -AUGUST 2014; Transportation Facilities and Parks Projects: Project Engineer. Responsible for coordination and supervision of all construction activities in various transportation facilities, and City Parks Projects located within Broward and Miami Dade Counties. Some of these projects were Federal funded. Contact: Wilson Sanchez. P.E., Enco, LLC 954.342.2466 FEBRUARY 2011 -JANUARY 2012; Municipality of San Juan; Light Regional Railcar: Project Manager. Design phase of local and regional "rapid rail line" that will run between San Juan and Caguas up to an ideally maximum 85 miles per hour (137 km/h), operating wholly on dedicated rights-of-way in the center of highway PR -52, covering the distance between the two cities in about 15 minutes (for comparison, an automobile takes about 20 minutes in non- rush hour time and may take up to 90 minutes in rush hour). Contact: Edgard() Hernandez, P.E., Municipality of San Juan Project Manager 787.347.3915 MARCH 2007 -JANUARY 2009; Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (PRI -ITA); PR -22 Expressway Rehabilitation: Resident Engineer. Scope included reconstruction of a rigid pavement segment of 6 miles long (including 4 bridges) of the Jose de Diego expressway surface (FHWA funded Project). This project has a budget of $19.9 Million. Construction is been executed seven days a week in two shifts a day. Contact: Jose Hernandez Borges, P.E., 787.340.2898 JULY 2003 -MARCH 2007; Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (PRHTA); Baldorioty Boulevard Roadway Construction: Resident Engineer. Project improvements consisted of the construction of drainage improvements, lighting, traffic signal system, relocation of utilities, landscaping, retaining walls, construction of existing highway, traffic signs, pavement markings and other miscellaneous works. Contact: Jose Hernandez Borges, P.E., 787.340.2898 APRIL 2000 -DECEMBER 2010; Puerto Rico Department sof Transportation (DTOP); Tren Urbano: The Tren Urbano is a 10.7 -mile (17.2 km) fully automated rapid transit that serves the metropolitan area of San Juan in Puerto Rico, and has stations in the municipalities of San Juan, Bayam�n and Guaynabo. Tren Urbano is currently made up of a single rapid transit route. It consists of 16 stations, ten of which are elevated, four at grade or in open cuttings, and two underground. Seven design -build contracts were awarded for different segments of the Tren Urbano Phase 1 system. Segments worked on: 43 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. E r cE P f I O V AE. SOLUTOS...V 'n David Alvarado, El. Contract Support Specialist Mr, Alvarado has been in the Construction and Engineering Fields for a total of 26 years. The last half of his career has been working on FDOT projects, first as an Inspector, then Assistant Contract Support Specialist and currently as a Contract Support Specialist. His beginning career was in the electrical and mechanical field. He has extensive experience working with programs such as; LIMS, EDMS, SharePoint, Virtual Inbox and SiteManager. PROJECT EXPERIENCE JANUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; General Assigned Contract; C9073; TWO #8; Project FM # 2507115-6-2-05: Contract Support Specialist. Assisting the District office with a Contract Support Specialist to assist with final estimates reviews and QA/QC. Contact: Barbara Espino, FDOT Project Manager 305.640.7405 APRIL 2015 -JANUARY 2017; FDOT District 4; Carnahan -Proctor -Cross, Inc., Andrew's Avenue Extension (from Atlantic Boulevard to John Knox Village); Project FM # 230724-1-52.01: ContractSupportSpecialist. Duties included collection, reviewed and verification, prepared and distributed project documentation (monthly certifications submittal, material certifications, shop drawings, etc.), process progress and final estimates and perform plan quantity analysis, calculations and adjustments to pay items (bituminous, spread rate, thickness, CPF, reduction in quantities). Reviewed plans, and plan revisions for constructability issues. This project involved. the reconstruction/realignment of Andrews Ave. from a two lane undivided roadway to a four lane divided urban section with bike lanes, sidewalks, a new drainage system consisting of curb inlets and pipes that collect and flow to proposed ponds that treat the runoff before it is discharged to the Old Pompano (C-14) Canal. New signalization, signing and pavement markings, lighting and landscaping. Contact: Angela Lietz, P.E., FDOT Project Manager 954.940.7523 JULY 2013 -MARCH 2015; FDOT District 4; Carnahan -Proctor -Cross, Inc.; Lantana Road Interchange Improvements: Senior Inspector. Project duties included sampling, measuring and collecting asphalt spread rate, base thickness adjustment, composite pay factors reports, monitoring on site construction activities, inspecting materials to be used in the project, sampling and testing to analyzing constructability issues that could lead to delay and overruns and helped with the final estimates close out package. The Improvements under this project consisted of roadway resurfacing, restoration, pavement signing and markings, bridge widening, traffic railing replacement, lighting, and signalization. Contact: Matthew Carlock, P.E., FDOT Project Manager 561.370.1127 • SEPTEMBER 2012 -JUNE 2013; FDOT 'District 6; Carnahan -Proctor -Cross, Inc.; North Dade District Construction Work Program: Senior Roadway Inspector. This contract involved managing multiples projects from the district construction work program, from pre -construction and plan review phases to certification of final estimates. David provided inspection, testing and reporting of rnultiple operations including: asphalt, lighting, signals, concrete, earthwork, and landscaping. Scope includes new bridges construction, milling/resurfacing, widening, drainage improvements, lighting installation, signage installation, pavement markings, etc. Contact: Ivan Hay, P.E., FDOT Project Manager 305.650.0016 44 Calvin, Giordano Associates, Inc. [E(LTPTIOVAk David Alvarado, E.I., Page 2 MAY 2010 -AUGUST 2012; FDOT District 4; Carnahan -Proctor -Cross, Inc.; Dixie Highway Flyover Project (from SR -810 to SW 18 St - ARRA, from SR -810 to Broward/Palm Beach County Line); Project FM # 230656- 1-52-01/231276-1-52-01: 30656-1-52-01/231276-1-52-01: Roadway Inspector. Scope of this $35M project included new bridge construction, drill shaft inspection, milling/resurfacing, widening, drainage improvements, lighting installation, signage installation and pavement markings. Contact: YveinsJean-Pierre, RE., Construction Project Oversight III 954.940.7611 SEPTEMBER 2005 -APRIL 2010; FDOT District 4; GBF Engineering, Inc.; Contact: Eghbal Jalali, FDOT Project Manager 954.958.7641 • SR -93(I-75) Alligator Alley Project (from RP 35.00 to A. Point west of SR -25 MP 18.870): Assistant Contract Support Specialist/Inspector. Project elements included milling/resurfacing, roadway widening, guardrail installation, signing and pavement markings. Responsibilities included assembling/crosschecking Computation book with the CPAM and the Prep & Doc Manual, preparing Time Folder, Supplemental Agreements, Word Orders, tracking quantities, documenting Overruns/Underruns, writing Engineer Weekly Summary Reports, assembling As-Builts, reviewing documentation sent by the Contractor and paying estimates in SiteManager. Duties also included preparing Summary of all Asphalt Pay Items in an excel ledger, checking QC Reports and Verification Daily Reports for errors or omissions, assembling Asphalt Lot Submittal Packages, verifying and calculating quantities for fuel and bit adjustments and calculating CPF payments. • I-75 (at Sheridan Street Interchange): Assistant Contract Support Specialist/Senior Inspector. Improvements on this $6M Lump Sum project included milling/resurfacing, roadway widening and safety enhancements, drainage improvements, signalization, guardrail installation, signing and pavement markings. Responsibilities included preparation of final estimate, project documentation and entering Daily Work Reports in SiteManager • I-75 Milling/Resurfacing: Inspector. Improvements on this $11M, six (6) mile section of I-75 in Froward County included milling/resurfacing, auxiliary lane construction, drainage improvements, lighting installation, signage installation, guardrail installation, pavement markings. FEBRUARY 2005 -SEPTEMBER 2005; Miami Dade County; GBF Engineering, Inc„ Three (3) Miami Gardens Drive Roadway and Bridge Reconstruction & Resurfacing Contracts: Roadway Inspector Aide. Duties included inspection, oversight and documentation of contractor's operations and assisting with project Final Estimates Package. Improvements included milling and resurfacing, concrete sidewalk installation, landscaping, signalization, lighting, striping and pavement markings and signage. Contact: Ivan Hay, P.E., FOOT Project Manager 305.650.0016 45 Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc. YCL.PtCOV.AL Sc1LU TtON S" Nauret Riverol Contract Support Specialist PROJECT EXPERIENCE FEBRUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/i-95 (from NW 29 Streetto NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: ContractSupportSpecialist. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/I-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County. The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511).. Contact: Joan Fabian, P.E., Project Oversite 111305.968.4921 AUGUST 2016 -JANUARY 2017; FDOT District 6; General Assigned Contract; C9073; TWO #5; Project FM # 2507115-6.2.05: Contract Support Specialist. Assisting the Department with various contract support related duties within the District. Contact: Barbara Espino; FDOT Project Manager 305.640.7405 AUGUST 2014 -JULY 2016; FDOT District 4; Advanced Traffic Management System and Advanced Traffic Control Systems Deployment; Project FM # 433301-1-62- 01: Contract Support Specialist: Contract to provide support for the preparation of all project documentation, processign progress and final estimates, material certificaiton, verification of contractor certifications and quantities, filing and scanning into EDMS assistance and support Project Administrator. Contact: Donald VanWhervin, RE., FDOT Project Manager 954.958.7654 OCTOBER 2012 -SEPTEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; Central Broward and Southern Broward Advanced Traffic Management System; Project FM # 427971 429607: Contract Support Specialist: Contract to provide support for the preparation of all project documentation, processign progress and final estimates, material certificaiton, verification of contractor certifications and quantities, filing and scanning into EDMS ,assistance and support Project Administrator. Contact: Heward Humes, RE., FDOT Project Manager 954.940.7505 AUGUST 2012 -OCTOBER 2012; FDOT District 4; SR 869/SW 10th Street (from 845/Powerline Road to E. Newport Center); Project FM # 424665.1.52.01: Contract Support Specialist: Resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation project that included shoulder widening of SR 869, drainage installation of pipes, pedestrian ramps, street lighting improvements, signalization improvements, landscaping, sfety concerns and environmental compliance. Contact: Arturo Castro; FDOT Project Manager 954.677-7055 JULY 2010 -JULY :Y 2012; FDOT District 4; SR 811/Dixie IEI,1 Tway Flyover Bridge (from S. Hillsboro Blvd. to N. of Hillsboro Blvd.) Project FM # 230656-1-51.01: Contract Support Specialist: Services included pile driving and drilled shaft inspections, mechanically stabilized earth wall, drainage, interconnect and directional bores, drainage installation of pipe, pedestrian ramps according to Americans with Disabiliteis Act, street lighting and signalization improvements, landscaping, MOT and environmental compliance. Contact: Yveins Jean-Pierre, RE., Construction Project Oversight 111954.940.7611 46 Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc, C T]i0'V,1t SOLUTION: Nauret Rivera, Page 2 JUNE 2009-JULY 2010; FDOT District 4; SR 817/University Drive (from S. Oakland Park Blvd. to N. Southgate Blvd.); Project FM # 415322-1-52-01: Contract Support Specialist: Project elements included roadway resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation for the existing mainline. Inspection services included monitor signing and pavement markings, interconnect and directional bores, drilled shaft installation, drainage installation of pipe, pedestrian ramps, street lighting and signalization improvments, irrigation, landscaping, MOT and environmental compliance. Contact: Rit Ky, P.E.; FDOT Project Manager 786.459.2672 OCTOBER x008 - JULY 2009; FDOT District 4; SR 817/University Drive (from Pines Blvd. to N. Griffin Road); Project FM # 415322-1-52-01: Contract Support Specialist: Project elements included roadway resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation for the existing mainline. Construction of a new sidewalk ADA compliant, bus bay, bus stop pads, canal bulkhead (steel sheet pile wall), concrete retainging and gravity walls. Inspection services included monitor signing and pavement markings, interconnect and directional bores, drilled shaft installation, pedestrian ramps, street lighting and signalization improvments, irrigaiton, landscaping, MOT and environmental compliance. Contact: Rit Ky, P.E.; FDOT Project Manager 786.459.2672 OCTOBER 1996 - AUGUST 2005; Miami -Dade County Public Works Department; Right of Way Division: Senior Cadastral Technician: Responsibilities included the analysis and interpretation of legal descriptions, title reports and boundary survey, review title search information prepared by abstractors to determine ownerships and other property interest, prepare exhibits, maps and sketches used in connection with acquisition functions and condemnation proceedings. OCTOBER 1989 - OCTOBER 1996; Miami -Dade County Public Works Department; Right of Way Division: Engineering Drafter 2: Responsibilities included assisting professional traffic engineers in performing a variety of technical engineering tasks, work required considerable knowledge of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Roadway and Traffic Design Standards (FOOT) and Highway Design Concepts and Terminology. 47 Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, 'Inc. C E P iI O N AL. S `,L.-_._� lU ) U i N 3" Erin Sudman Associate Contract Compliance Specialist/Landscape Specialist SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Sudman has over 10 years experience as an Associate Contract Support Specialist, Resident Compliance Specialist, Construction Coordinator, Landscape Inspector, and Landscape Designer for Large-scale site planning,streetscapes, general open space, commercial development projects, FDOT-specific projects, municipal streetscape enhancements, tree -restoration projects, planting design and hardscape design. PROJECT EXPERIENCE JUNE 2016 -PRESENT; FDOT District 4; General Assigned Contract; C9855; TWO# 26; Project FM # 228027-8.62-01: Associate Contract Support Specialist. Assisting the Department with EDMS scanning as well as perform other Final Estimates related services. Contact: Stacey Sasala, FDOT Project Manager 954.777.4382 OCTOBER 2016 -PRESENT; City of Pompano Beach; SW 36th Avenue Sidewalk Project (from West McNab Road to West Palm Aire Drive); Project FM # 431715- 1-58-01 (LAP Funded $628,755.50); Resident Compliance Specialist. The project scope includes the installation of a sidewalk along the west side of SW 36th Avenue commencing on the south end of Canal W north to Palin Aire Drive, a pedestrian flashing beacon crosswalk at the intersection of SW 36th Avenue and Gateway Drive, storm drainage construction, demolition, utility work, and permanent signage & striping. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 ANUARY 2016 -PRESENT; FDOT District 4; LAP Funded; City of Pompano Beach; MLX (Hammondviile Road) Improvements (From Powerline Road to Turnpike) Project FM # 4328614.58.01 (LAP Funded $ 2n855,802); Contract Support Specialist/Resident Compliance Specialist/Landscape Specialist. Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786,7834 MARCH 2016 -AUGUST 2016; FDOT District 4; City of Oakland Park; Joint Participation Agreement and Maintenance for State Road 845 (Powerline Road) from Prospect Road (M.P. 3.063) to State Road 870 (Commercial Boulevard) (M.P. 3.585); Project FM #437225-1.74-01, Contract# ARW58: Contract Support Specialist/Landscape Specialist. Improvements consist of irrigation installation within median, landscape relocation and installation. Contact: Akin Ozaydin, P.E., Project Manager 954.630.4343 APRIL 2015 -JULY 2015; City of Oakland Park; Continuing Professional Services Cont. Landscape Plan Review: Landscape Specialist Enforce mentand implementation of commercial property landscape improvement per code. Researched existing properties along high visibilty corridors, landscape plan records, field verification, detailed inventory with an elaborate spreadsheet, plan analysis and photo identification. Inventory to be utilized by the City to gain compliance and improvement of the commercial properties throughout Oakland Park. (Contact: Donald Quier 954.630.4400 JANUARY 2015 -MARCH 2016; FDOT District 4; General Assigned Contract; SRA1A Bridge No. 860011 Over Hillsboro Inlet; Project FM # 425935-1-52-01/425935- 1-52-02: Associate Contract Support Specialist/EDMS Coordinator. Improvements included rehabilitation of existing span drive machinery including but not limited Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. E X; C f P T l O N A t S O 1 U t I O' 4 S" Erin Sudman, Page 2 drive motors, secondary reducer and new span locks replacement, Bridge pier structural retrofit to accommodate a new (2) two story Tender House building, replace east sidewalk with upgraded configuration, including new steel traffic rails and pedestrian rails from beginning of south approach to end of north approach. Replaced fender maintenance platforms and ships ladders, open grid decking replacement and concrete filled decking. New sidewalk plate supports, floor beam modifications, electrical upgrades, pluming, renovate fender system with 66 pile repairs, Installation new plastic lumber decking and navigation lights. Cleaned and coated structural steel, applied Class 5 coatings. Installed new shaft/cantilevered sign, traffic gates, lighting foundations, added second tender house, installation of decorative statue, accent lighting and re -painting of bridge. Reconstruction and widening of N Riverside Drive under the Bridge including construction of new barrier wall along right shoulder. Contact: Andres Atehortua, Project Administrator 786.236.0791 SEPTEMBER 2014 -DECEMBER 2014; City of Weston, Commercial and Residential Landscape and Irrigation Inspections: Landscape Inspector. All inclusive landscape inspections for multi -family, commercial and residential inspections and irrigation inspections. Contact: Bill Tesauro (CCA), Director of Landscape Review/Inspections 954.921.7781 AUGUST 2014 -NOVEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; City of Tamarac; Joint Participation Agreement and Maintenance for State Road 870 (Commercial Blvd) from East of NW 49th Avenue (MP 2.330) to Florida's Turnpike Interchange (MP 2.737) Landscape Inspections; Broward Highway Beautification Grant (FY -13-14) Project FM # 429965-1-58-01, Contract # ARB90: Construction Coordinator/Landscape Inspector. Project consisted of the installation of auto controlled irrigation system, trenching, backfilling, St. Augustine sod placement and installation of 16 Medjool Date Palms. Contact: Rodney Sims, Project Manager 954.444.2247 APRIL 2014 -JULY 2014; City of West Palm Beach; Okeechobee Blvd CWest of 1-95 to Tamarind Ave) Landscaping Project; Project FM # 426015-1-58-01: Construction Coordinator/Landscape Inspector. The Okeechobee Blvd project included the construction of landscaping and irrigation improvements within the project area. Contact: Brian Collins, P.E., Project Manager/ City Traffic Engineer 561.494.1076 MARCH 2014 -SEPTEMBER 2014; Seminole Tribe of Brighton; . BIA Route 1300 (Harney Pond Road) from Flowing Well Road to Reservation Road (CR 721), BIA Project # S5342203: Construction Coordinator. Project consisted of the widening of 1.155 gross miles of Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Route 1300 (Harney Pond Road), It involved reconstructing the current 20 foot roadway to a 33 foot roadway with 8 foot sodded shoulders. As part of the project, sidewalks, signing and pavement marking, ditches and cross drains were constructed, and approximately 6,100 LE of 10" PVC raw water main line below finished grade within the right-of-way. Contact: Fabian Lefler, P.E., Project Manager 954.894.1060 ext. 10902 MARCH 2014 -DECEMBER 2014; Department of Environmental Protection; Florida Keys Heritage Trail; Windley Key segment, MM84.2-85.2; Project FM # 420911.1.56-0, FDEP Project # 67928: Construction Coordinator. The project consisted of the construction of a multiple use trail along SR-5/US. Construction included clearing and grubbing, earthwork, drainage, asphalt paving, landscaping, striping, and sign installation, among others. Contact: James Post, Project Manager 305.853.3571 JANUARY 2014 -JUNE 2014; City of West Palm Beach; Clematis Street improvements; LAP Project FM # 427652- 1-58-01 (LAP Funded $446,595): Construction Coordinator/.'Landscape Inspector. The Clematis Street project included pedestrian and landscape enhancements such as construction of a landscaped median and installation of additional landscaping, tree grates, benches, bike racks, trash receptacles, sidewalk, milling and resurfacing, striping, signing and irrigation system from Sapodilla Avenue to Tamarind Avenue. Contact: Brian Collins, P.E., Project Manager / City Traffic Engineer 561.494.1076 49 Alfredo Rauseo, RE, Senior Inspector PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc, E CCE P I 1 0 V A L S O L U T L D S FEBRUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (from NW 29 Street to NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Senior Inspector. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/I-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County. The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact; loan Fabian, P.E., Project Oversite 111305.968.4921 OCTOBER 2016 -PRESENT; City of Pompano Beach; SW 36th Avenue Sidewalk Project (from West McNab Road' to West Palm Aire Drive); Project FM # 431715- 1-58-01 (LAP Funded $628,755.50): Senior Inspector. The project scope includes the installation of a sidewalk along the west side of SW 36th Avenue commencing on the south end of Canal "A" north to Palm Aire Drive, a pedestrian flashing beacon crosswalk at the intersection of SW 36th Avenue and Gateway Drive, storm drainage construction, demolition, utility work, and permanent signage & striping. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 OCTOBER 2015 -OCTOBER 2016; US Coast Guard; P.E. Design Support: Contract Support Specialist. Full time onsite assignment to provide assistance in performing quality assurance reviews, developing draft plans and specifications, reviewing contracting documents, administrative support to design team and review procurement documents for accuracy. JULY 2014 -OCTOBER 2015; Miami -Dade Transit; Lehman Center Test Track: Project Administrator/Senior Inspector. This project consisted of the construction of a new test track (2,500 feet long) at the existing Metrorail Lehman Center Facility. This implementation was necessary to provide the required test facility in support of the 136 new Metrorail 'vehicles. The test track is used for inspection, testing and certification of the new fleet contact: Malka G. Rodriguez; MDT Construction Manager 786.469.5308 JULY 2014 -OCTOBER 2015; Miami -Dade Transit; Lehman Yard Rehabilitation Expansion Phase 1: Senior Inspector This project consisted of five storage and two maintenance of way (MOW) tracks at the existing Metrorail Lehman Center Facility. This implementation was necessary to provide the required storage and transition facility in support of the 136 new M etrorail vehicles. Contact: Malka G. Rodriguez; MDT Construction Manager 786.469.5308 AUGUST 2012-J'UNE 2014; MDX; SR 874 Mainline Reconstruction; Work Program No.: 87409.050: Senior Roadway Inspector. This Project included capacity improvements to the 874 mainline by adding one (1) lane in each direction from 50 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc, YCEPT1 ) VJ t SOLU Tl Ely Alfredo Rauseo, RE, Page 2 Kendall Drive to SR -826. The improvement also included bridge widening at Snapper Creek canal (C-2 canal), Galloway Road (SW 87 Ave.), Sunset Drive (SW 72 Ave.), Miller Drive (SW 56 Ave.), retaining walls, shoulder/retaining wall mounted, and ground mounted noise walls, drainage, milling and resurfacing and signing and pavement marldng. Contact: Juan Toledo, P.E.; MDX Project Manager 305.637.3277 JUNE 2011 -AUGUST 2012; FDOT District 6; NW 27th Ave (from NW 11th Street to NW 43 Terrace) Milling and Resurfacing; Project FM # 422612-1-62-01: Senior Inspector. Improvements included drainage, sidewalk and curb reconstruction. Contact: Ivan Hay, PE.; FDOT Resident Engineer 305.650.0016 APRIL 2011 -JUNE 2011; FDOT District 6; NE 82nd St (from SR 5/Biscayne Blvd. to NE Bayshore Ct.) Roadway Improvements; Project FM # 410646-3-62-01: Senior Inspector. The project included milling and resurfacing with sidewalk and curb reconstruction along with drainage improvements and guardrail installations. Contact: Ivan Hay, P.E.; FDOT Resident Engineer 305.650.0016 2010-2011; Turnpike Enterprises; All Electronic open Road Tolling Conversion; Project FM # 417547-1 / 406096-4 / 417544-1: Senior Inspector. Project consisted on demolishing existing toll facilities and installing open road tolling structures. The project included the drilled shaft construction, gravity walls, guardrail installations, milling and resurfacing operations, drainage improvements, and general building construction activities for the new building facilities holding all electronic equipments for the toll collection system. Contact: Willy Garcia, RE. 305.2 78. 9766 2008-2010; FDOT District 6; NW 5th St. Bascule Bridge Construction; Project FM # 412808-1: Senior lnspector. Project consisted of the relocation of utilities and installation of new water and sewer system including 1 mile of roadway reconstruction, asphalt with polymer placement, 3 MSE walls, a sheet pile wall, 6 gravity walls, drill shafts, sidewalks, curbs, ADA ramps, striping, fencing, landscape, lighting and signalization. Contact: Art Perez, PE.; 786251.8059 2006-2008; FDOT District 6; 12th Ave / SR 933 Bascule Bridge Construction; Project FM # 249640-1-52: Senior Inspector. Construction consisted of four 4 MSE walls with temporary wire walls; electrical and mechanical installation, coating, bolting, railings, control tower finishing, and subcable installation across the river using directional boring. Contact: Art Perez, P.E.; 786.251.8059 2006; FDOT District 6 - SR 820 / Hollywood Bridge Rehabilitation; Project FM # 407507-1-52-01: Senior Bridge Inspector. Rehabilitation project to the whole system bridge and road components; including bridge metallic structure, mechanical and electrical components, new control towers and roadway structures such as architectural railings, guardrails and barrier walls. Other aspects included whole coating rehabilitation and removing existing lead paint. Reinforced concrete quality control, including sampling and testing such as pull test operations were also performed. New signing, drilled shafts and architectural detailing included. Contact: Evelio Hernandez 786.236.2571 2005-2006; FDOT District 4; SR 870 / Commercial Blvd. (frons SR 845 / Poweriine Rd. to NE 19th Ave.); Project FM # 227952-1-52-01 /412300-1-52-01: Senior Inspector, Project improvements included road widening, retainirng. wall installation, embankment, stabilization, base and asphalt, directional boring, sidewalk installation, curb and gutter, traffic separators, lighting and signalization, Contact: Art Perez, PE.; 786.251.8059 2004-2005; DERM FEMA; Miami Dade County: Inspector. Review and interpret plans, site layouts, specifications, and construction methods to ensure compliance to legal requirements and safety regulations. Inspection and monitoring of construction site to ensure adherence to management of traffic standards. Inspection of drainage structures and materials to determine soundness and compliance with specifications and standards. Maintain daily logs and supplement inspection records with photographs. 51 Calvin, Giordano 8, Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' Bruce Bernard Senior Inspector SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Bruce Bernard has more than 40 years of construction management experience. After graduating from Broward Community College, Bruce pursued a career in the utility industry. Bruce held multiple positions including the Public Works Director for the Town of Davie prior to joining the CGA Team. He was then appointed the position of Field Services Manager at CGA. Throughout his career, Bruce has managed hundreds of millions of dollars in construction for federal, state, local and private clients. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Field Services Manager - Constructio Associates, Inc. Ft Lauderdale, FL. Services Department. Calvin, Giordano, & • Manage staff of field inspectors involved in projects across South Florida. • Manage and approval of contractor payment application, change order, claim request and constructive directives. • Manage conflict resolution between the Contractor and Owner to ensure a timely completion of all projects. Projects Managed: • Town of Surfside Utility Rehabilitation Project • Town of Bay Harbor Island 92nd Street Park construction • Town of Bay Harbor Island Community Improvement for roadway, water main, lighting and irrigation for Phase 2 and 3 • City of North Miami roadway enhancements • City of Pembroke Pines Water Treatment Plant Expansion ' • City of Pembroke Pines roadway enhancements for SW 172 and 184th Aves • City of Miramar Wastewater Plant Expansion • SW 145th Ave and Petnbroke Gardens roadway and utility installation • Jackson Memorial South Hospital Improvements Public Works Director.. Town of Davie, Davie, FL (1981-Z006) Directed operations within department in regard to buildings, parks, roadway, right- of- way, trail system and stornmwater maintenance. He was responsible for the management of Town of Davie Capital Projects including construction for parks a.nd. governmental buildings. He supervised a staff of seventy-two employees, managed a six -million dollar department budget, and eight million dollar capital improvement budget. During his tenure with the Town of Davie, Mr, Bernard served as Chief Wastewater Operator, Assistant Utility Director, Capital Projects Coordinator, and Chief Engineering Inspector. Lead Operator Wastewater Plant - City of Lauderhill, Lauderhill, FL. (1976-1981) Lead Operator Mr. Bernard supervised the operations at a 4 MGD Wastewater Plant with sand filters with polishing pond for surface water discharge. He gained experience in dealing with governmental agencies, activity reports, payroll detailing and supervisory skills overseeing a staff of ten.. Plant Operator, Southern Gulf Utilities (1.974-1976) Plant Operator, Mr. Bernard began as an operator trainee and achieved both water and wastewater operator's licenses within one year. He worked to gainknowledge of field operation and plant design. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 40 YEARS WiITU THE FIRM 10 EDUCATION Steward Community College, 1972 University of Michigan Managernent course, 1979 CERTIFICATIONS & LICENSES TIN# B65607958 CTQP Final Estimates 1 ACI ° Concrete Field Tech CTWP Earthwork Level 1 Traffic Construction Certificate of Training t isaster Debris Management FEMA Emergency Management Utility Terrorism Preparation & Response Asphalt Pavement Maintenance Licensed in Water and Wastewater Plant Operations OSHA 10 Hour Safety Certified Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc, EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' Dave Robbins Senior Inspector SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Robbins has more than 42 years of experience in the engineering/construction field, as 'a draftsman, surveyor and inspector. In his current position as Field Operations Manager, he is involved with water and wastewater plants expansions, as well as lift stations, water and sewer systems, drainage systems and roadways (widening and new), and both active and passive/beach parks. In 1992 and 1993, he worked as a state inspector (thru CGA), writing damage survey reports throughout Dade County with FEMA. In 1996, he worked with FDOT on a widening project of the on ramp to 1-75 from Pines Boulevard, In 2002, he was project manager for the Sombrero Beach renovations in Marathon, Florida, aproject that included new bathrooms, environmental concerns for turtle nesting and existing dunes, landscaping and walkways, community pavilion and a residential building. His current office responsibilities include quality control reviews and as -built reviews. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Surfside Seawall Replacement, Surfside, FL Mr. Robbins inspects new seawall installation. Project Started: 2016 Project Completed: In -Process Penske Porsche Dealer, Reference: Marvin Flores (678) 327-9144 Mr. Robbins inspected and tested all areas of infrastructure including water, sewer, drainage and roadways, Project Started: 2014 Project Completed: 2016 Boca Bath and Tennis, Boca Raton, FL References Ken Goatley (561) 239-3069 Mr. Robbins inspected replacement of water main and road restoration. Project Started: 2015 Project Completed:2015 North Lauderdale Water Treatment Plant, North Lauderdale,FL References George IZrawczyk (954) 724-7070 Mr. Robbins was the inspector/coordinator for this project, He was in charge of overseeing the demolition of the existing facilities as well as coordinated with the structural engineer to rehab existing filter. Project Started; 2011 Project Completed; 2013 Lift Station Rehab, Cooper City, FL Reference; jim Molaschi (954) 560-361.2. Mr. Robbins was the Field Operations Manager for this job. He was in charge of coordinating the rehab/installation of new wet wells and pumps. Project Started: December 2011 Project Completed: 2012 Miramar East Water Treatment Plant, Miramar, FL Mr. Robbins was the inspector/coordinator for this project. He was in charge of overseeing the demolition of the existing facilities as well as coordinated with the structural engineer as the new building, water tank and filter were installed. Project Started; 2008 Project Completed; 2009 Siena Townhomes, Hollywood, FL Reference: Don Strout (954) 668-4518 Mr. Robbins was the Field Operations Manager. He inspected and testedall areas of infrastructure including; water, sewer, drainage and roadways. Project Started; 2006 Project Completed; 2007 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 42 YEARS WITH THE FIRM 27 EDUCATION Adirondack Community College AS., Honorable Discharge from U.S. Navy CERTIFICATIONS & LICENSES TIN#: R162165491440; Governor's Hurricane Conference, Recovery Disaster — The Local Government Role, NIMS 15.- 00700, 5-00700, ICS IS -00200, ICS IS -00100,, IS -00800, Erosion Control . Certified Inspector, CRP Asphalt Paving Technician Level 1, FDDT EEO, DRE and Payroll Compliance an Local Area Projects, OSHA Construction Safety Health, GRIP Intermediate MOT & PENDING Final Estimates Level 1 Dave Robbins, Page 2 Cimmeron Townhomes, Davie, FL, Reference: John Phillips (954) 797-1113 Mr. Robbins was the Field Operations Manager. He inspected and tested all areas of infrastructure including; water, sewer, drainage and roadways. Project Started: 2004 Project Completed: 2005 Sombrero Beach, Marathon FL Mr. Robbins was the Field Operations Manager. His duties included coordinating, inspected installations of restrooms, sidewalks, crossovers, residence, pavilions and playground equipment Project Started: 2001 Project Completed: 2002 Pembroke Falls Townhomes, Pembroke Pines, FL Mr. Robbins was the Field Operations Manager. He inspected and tested all areas of infrastructure including; water, sewer, drainage and roadways. Project Started: 1995 Project Completed: 1999 1-75/Pines Blvd. Turn Lanes Reference: District 4 - FDOT- Roderick Myrick, Project Manager (954) 921-7781 Mr. Robbins was the Field Operations Manager on this job. He was in charge of inspecting demolition of old roadway and the construction of the new turn lanes, drainage, slopes and field testing. Project Started: 1996 Project Completed: 1996 FEMA, Dade County, FL Mr. Robbins worked with FEMA as an inspector surveying the damage of Hurricane Andrew writing Damage Survey Report's. Project Started: 1992 Project Completed: 1993 54 Gary Craig Senior Inspector PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc. E Xis E P T I O NAL SOLUTIONS" FEBRUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (from NW 29 Street to NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Senior Inspector. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/I-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County. The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact: Joan Fabian, P.E., Project Oversite 111305.968.4921 MARCH 2016 -DECEMBER 2016; Sunny Isles Beach; SIB Capital Improvements Project; North Bay Road Emergency Access Bridge & Seawall Mitigation (North Bay Road Between NE 172nd and 174th Street): Senior Bridge Inspector. The proposed bridge is necessary as an alternate route for emergency vehicles because north -south access is limited to Collins Avenue, mainly for emergency vehicles, the bridge will be open to pedestrians and will provide an alternate evacuation route during hurricane and tropical storm events. To prevent non -emergency vehicular use, gates will be installed along the north and south entrances and be operated by City personnel. The bridge will measure 263 feet long by 39 feet wide with a minimum of eight (8) feet over -water clearance for navigational access. The south side and the east end of the canal are bordered by halophytic wetlands, which exist within the proposed footprint of the bridge. Contact: Bob McSweeney, P.E., Project Manager 954.921.7781 JANUARY 2015 -MARCH 2016; FDOT District 4; SRA1A Bridge No. 860011 Over Hillsboro Inlet; Project FM # 425935-1-52-01/425935-1-52-02: Senior Bridge Inspector. Improvements included rehabilitation of existing span drive machinery including but not limited to drive motors, secondary reducer and new span locks replacement, Bridge pier structural retrofit to accommodate a new (2) two story Tender House building, replace east sidewalk with upgraded configuration, including new steel traffic rails and pedestrian rails from beginning of south approach to end of north approach. Replaced fender maintenance platforms and ships ladders, open grid decking replacement and concrete filled decking. New sidewalk plate supports, floor beam modifications, electrical upgrades, plumbing, renovate fender system with 66 pile repairs, Installation new plastic lumber decking and navigation lights. Cleaned and coated structural steel, applied Class 5 coatings. Installed new shaft/cantilevered sign, traffic gates, lighting foundations, added second tender house, installation of decorative statue, accent lighting and re -painting of bridge. Reconstruction and widening of N Riverside Drive under the Bridge including construction of new barrier wall along right shoulder. Contact: YveinsJean-Pierre, P.E., Construction Project Oversight 111954.940.7611 JULY 2013 -DECEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; General Assigned Contract: • 1-595 EB/WB Bridge (860427/860428) Rehab; Project FM #429095-1-62- 01: Senior Bridge Inspector. Scope included upgrades to navigation lights and bridge fender systems. Contact: David Schweiger 954.734.3539 55 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc.. EXCEPTIONAL 5 O L U TIO Gary Craig, Page 2 • SR 816 (Oakland Park Blvd. & NW 56 Avenue): Senior Inspector. Scope included addition of left turn lanes, widening, new drainage structures, curbs and ADA sidewalks. Installed new lighting, milled and resurfaced E13 lanes and intersection, modified existing signal masts with new foundation and arms, drill shaft improvements, new pedestrian signals and conduits. Tim Butler 954.868.7232 • SR 820 (Hollywood Blvd. & 35th Ave.): Senior Inspector. Scope included upgrades to traffic signals, bridge fender systems and drill shafts. Contact: Felix Garcia 954.776.4300 • SR 811 (Dixie Hwy at McNab Road and SW 3rd Avenue): Senior Inspector. Scope included upgrades to traffic signals and drill shafts. Contact: Tim Butler 954.868.7232 JANUARY 2013 -JUNE 2013; FDOT Disirict 4; Bridge Deck Overlay; Project FM # 425995-1-52-01: Senior Bridge Inspector. This project entailed application of epoxy as an overlay system to rehabilitate 13 concrete bridge decks on I-95 between I-595 and the Tri -Rail Station at Broward Blvd. Bridges included were; 860524, 860525, 860526, 860527, 860528, 860537, 860538, 860542, 860600, 860601, 860603, 860628 & 860638. Contact: Eghbal Jalali, FDOT Project Manager 954.958.7641 NOVEMBER 2012 -MARCH 2013; FDOT District 4; SR 710/Beeline Hwy (from west of Congress Avenue to west of Australian Avenue); Project FM # 229897-2-62-01: Senior Bridge Inspector. The improvements for this project include widening roadway from 2 to 4 lanes, pond excavations, demucking, earthwork, utility relocations, drainage, milling and resurfacing, lighting, signalization, drill shaft inspection, infrastructure improvements, ADA compliance, environmental compliance, pond construction, landscaping, irrigation and signage. These capacity improvement expanded port access to better accommodate heavy truck volumes that traverse this section of the locally known Parson Heights community Contact: Rob Cables, FDOT Project Manager 561.719.7799 OCTOBER 2010 -NOVEMBER 2012; FDOT District 4; I-595 Express Corridor Improvement ($1,25 B) P3 Project: Senior Bridge Inspector on approx. 65 bridge construction and reconstruction. The project extended from the I-75/ Sawgrass Expressway interchange to the I -595/I-95 interchange. The corridor improvements consisted of tolled, reversible, ground -level express lanes within the median of I-595, safety modifications to the I-595/Florida Turnpike interchange, continuous connection of SR 84 between Davie Road and SR 7/US 441, auxiliary lanes on I-595 with combined ramps, cross -road bypasses and grade -separated entrance and exit ramps. The express lane consist of three tolled, reversible lanes, each lane is 12 feet wide with a full 10 foot shoulder on each side. Elements of construction included; rigid pavement at tolling sites, drainage improvements, drill shaft inspection, MSE wall construction, lighting, milling and resurfacing, signage, earthwork, lighting, bridge inspections, concrete barrier wall installation, pavement markings and landscape. Client: Dragados-USA; FDOT Contact: Tomas,Almonte, P.E. 786.348.9975 NOVEMBER 2009 -OCTOBER 2010; FDOT District 4; SR 869/1-75 Interchange Bridges (10 bridges) and SR 838/ Sunrise Blvd Bridges (860466/8&0467); Project FM # 411852-1.62-01/12493-1-62.01: Senior Bridge Inspector. Work consisted of the repair of 10 concrete box girder bridges off the I-75, I-595 and Sawgrass Expressway Interchanges.. Other work included Bascule Bridge Rehab on Sunrise Blvd over the Intracoastal Waterway. Scope of all these bridge rehabs consisted of repainting structural steel, cleaning, sealing and injecting epoxy into segment joints, removing expansion joint devices and replacing with a type 2 Polymer (two component epoxy mortar), applying epoxy overlay on the entire roadway deck and strength testing. Contact; Eghbal Jalali, FDOT Project Manager 954.958.7641 MARCH 2008 -NOVEMBER 2009; FOOT District 4; 3R Project; SR 7/US 441 (from Palm Beach County Line north to Glades Road): Senior Inspector. Project features consisted of milling and resurfacing, major signalization improvements, the construction of 15 drilled shafts, pedestrian signal improvements, lighting improvements, drainage construction, guardrail installation, ADA rarnps improvements, construction of new curb and gutter, signing and pavement markings improvements. Contact: Rob Cables, FDOT Project Manager 561.719.7799 56 Julio Antonio Senior Inspector PROJECT EXPERIENCE Galvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc, EXCEP T] O N A L S O L D T I O N S" JANUARY 2017 -PRESENT; Sunny Isles Beach; SIB Capital Improvements Project; North Bay Road Emergency Access Bridge & Seawall Mitigation (North Bay Road Between NE 172nd and 174th Street): Senior Bridge Inspector. The proposed bridge is necessary as an alternate route for emergency vehicles because north -south access is limited to Collins Avenue, mainly for emergency vehicles, the bridge will be open to pedestrians and will provide an alternate evacuation route during hurricane and tropical storm events. To prevent non -emergency vehicular use, gates will be installed along the north and south entrances and be operated by City personnel. The bridge will measure 263 feet long by 39 feet wide with a minimum of eight (8) feet over -water clearance for navigational access. The south side and the east end of the canal are bordered by halophytic wetlands, which exist within the proposed footprint of the bridge. Contact: Bob McSweeney, P.E., Project Manager 954.921.7781 OCTOBER 2015 -DECEMBER 2016; City of Oakland Park; Expanded Lloyd Estates Residential and Industrial Improvements Project: Senior Inspector. The project boundary is located south of Prospect Road, north of Oakland Park Boulevard, east of Powerline Road and west of Andrews Avenue. This project includes drainage improvements, water main replacement, installation of flood gates, stormwater pump station and a tidal check valve. The proposed drainage improvements include construction of roadside swales, construction of new stormwater conveyance system piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing conveyance systems and construction of new outfall structures that discharge into the Sleepy River. Contact: Akin Ozaydin, P.E., Project Manager 954.630.4343 OCTOBER 2015 -PRESENT; City of Oakland Park; Bid Pack 9 Infrastructure Improvements: Senior Inspector. The project encompasses approximately 570 acres, the project boundaries are east of Dixie Highway, west of Federal Highway, north of NE 38th Street and south of NE 50th Court. This project includes drainage improvement, water main replacement, sewer force main replacement, rehabilitation of Lift Station B-2, Lift Station #3, Lift Station #4, sidewalk installation, roadway improvements and resurfacing. The proposed drainage improvements include construction of roadside swales and underdrains, construction of new stormwater conveyance system piping networks and exfiltration trenches, modification of the existing conveyance systems and replacement of existing outfall structures that discharge into the existing interconnected lakes and canals. Construction of roadway improvements on NE 45th Street (aka: Floranada Road) will include the addition of paved shoulders and eastbound lane widening at the intersection of NE 18th Avenue. Sidewalk construction will take place on NE 18th Avenue from NE 45th Street to Commercial Boulevard. Contact: Akin Ozaydin, P.E., Project Manager 954.630.4343 AUGUST 2013 -OCTOBER 2015; FDOT District4; Broward County Transportation/ Service and Capital Planning; General Assigned Contract C9855; ADA Improvements and Shelter Installations at Bus Stops: Senior Inspector. Improvements include ADA upgrades to sidewalks, new bus shelters, removal and replacement of damaged concrete sidewalk slabs, site furnishings, bike racks, signage, electrical underground wiring and components such as lighting and solar power supplies, and relocation of existing landscaping and irrigation throughout Broward County Contact: Arethia Douglas, P.E., Broward County Transit 954.357.8375 57 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. E X C E+ 11O '1 •t t S O '0...0 i 1 D V S' Julio Antonio, Page 2 JANUARY 2013 -JUNE 2013; FDOT District 4; Bridge Deck Overlay; Project FM # 425995.1-52.01: Senior Bridge Inspector. This project entailed application of epoxy as an overlay system to rehabilitate 13 concrete bridge decks on 1-95 between I-595 and the Tri -Rail Station at Broward Blvd. Bridges included were; 860524, 860525, 860526, 860527, 860528, 860537, 860538, 860542, 860600, 860601, 860603, 860628 & 860638. Contact: Eghba! Jalali, FDOT Project Manager 954.958.7641 JANUARY 2012 -DECEMBER 2012; MDX; Design -Build for Central Boulevard Widening Realignment and Service Loop Construction; Miami International Airport (MIA): Senior Inspector/Senior Bridge Inspector. Main components of this $47 M project included reconstruction of Central Blvd. from Le Jeune Road to the UVD and LVD, 7 new bridges, widening and rehabilitation to 2 existing bridges, construction of NW 42nd Court (links MIA to NW 14th Street), a decorative retaining wall system, new way -finding signing system, ITS, inbound and outbound DMS signs and new landscape and irrigation system. Contact: Juan Quiroga, PE., Project Manager 305.265.5400 MARCH 2011 -DECEMBER 2011; FDOT District 4; SR 5/US 1 from Hillsboro Blvd (Broward County) to SE 5th Street (Palm Beach County); Project FM # 415310-1-52-01: Senior Inspector. Project consisted of ADA ramps, milling and resurfacing, signalization and landscape installation. Contact: ScottBurrie, Project Manager 561.432.4966 OCTOBER 2009 -FEBRUARY 2011; FDOT District4; I.595 Express Corridor Improvement ($1.25 B) P3 Project: Senior Bridge Inspector. The project extended from the I-75/Sawgrass Expressway interchange to the I -595/I-95 interchange. The corridor improvements consisted of tolled, reversible, ground -level express lanes within the median of I-595, safety modifications to the I-595/Florida Turnpike interchange, continuous connection of SR 84 between Davie Road and SR 7/US 441, auxiliary lanes on 1-595 with combined ramps, cross -road bypasses •and grade -separated entrance and exit ramps. The express lane consist of three tolled, reversible lanes, each lane is 12 feet wide with a full 10 foot shoulder on each side. Elements of construction included; rigid pavement at tolling sites, drainage improvements, drill shaft inspection, MSE wall construction, lighting, milling and resurfacing, signage, earthwork, lighting, bridge inspections, concrete barrier wall installation, pavement markings and landscape. Client: Dragados-USA; FDOT Contact: Tomas Almonte, P.E. 786.348.9975 FEBRUARY 2007 -SEPTEMBER 2009; FDOT District 6; Turnpike Enterprise; Okeechobee Mainline Express Lanes and 74th Street Interchange; Project FM # 415905-1-62-01 and 406104-1-62-01 ($64 M): Senior Inspector/Senior Building Inspector. The work involved in these contracts was the construction of a new Interchange at NW 74th Street with the Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike as well as the installation of two mainline signature gantries for open road tolling and four new equipment buildings at the ramps. Additional work included overhead signs, drilled shafts, building construction, fiber -reinforced concrete pavement, toll plaza renovations and. existing sign modifications. Contact: Mario Rojas, P.E., FDOT Project Manager 305.986.6417 JUNE 2006 -FEBRUARY 2007; FDOT District 4; I-95 Mobility 2000, Project 2,1-95 from 12th Avenue South to 10th Avenue North Project FM # 231918-1-52-01/02: Senior Inspector. Project involved widening of 1-95 from 6 lanes to 10 lanes (approximately 1.8 miles),widening of the existing Lake Worth Viaduct Bridge, replaced the existing bridge over 6th Avenue South, reconstructed the mainline ramps, drainage improvements, sound barrier wall and retaining wall installation, signing and pavement marking, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, and communication elements. Contact: Eduardo Caballero, RE, FDOT Project Manager 561.370.1104 JUNE 2005 -JUNE 2006; FDOT District 6; NW 27th Avenue (from 39th Street to 79th Street) Milling and Resurfacing, Project FM # 250230-1-52-01: Senior Inspector. Improvements included milling and resurfacing, pavement signing and markings, new traffic signals, drill shafts, handicap ramps, new signage and vehicle detector/ counters. Contact: Isa Nunez, P.E., FDOT Project Manager 305.499..2370 58 Galvin, Giordano F.7 Associates, Inc. XCEPTIONAL SOL U T ION S" Jason Kattwinkel Inspector PROJECT EXPERIENCE DECEMBER 2015 -PRESENT; FDOT D-4 LAP- City of Pompano Beach; MLK (Hammondville Road) Improvements (from Powerline Road to Turnpike) Project FM # 432861-1-58- 01 (LAP Funded $ 3,555,802): Senior Inspector. Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786.7834 OCTOBER 2013- AUGUST 2015; Turnpike Enterprises; Resurface Sawgrass MP 0.00 to 8.17; Project FM # 431089-3-52-01: Senior Inspector. This was a $7.6M project that consisted of the milling and resurfacing of 8 miles of the Sawgrass Expressway.Contact: Pacifico Castillo, TPK Project Manager 954.444.8050 JUNE 2013 -DECEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; SR-5/US-1 (from South of 13th Street to Silver Beach Road); Project FM #'s 229744-3-52-01/229744-3-56-01: Inspector. This project consisted of roadway reconstruction of 1.348 miles in Riviera Beach. Improvements included; rniiling and resurfacing, replacement of curb & gutter, sidewalks, drainage improvements, water main installation, signalization, signing, pavement markings and stripping, landscape, irrigation and decorative hardscape. Contact:: Scott Burrie, FDOT Project Manager 561.4314966 FEBRUARY 2013 -DECEMBER 2014; FDOT District 4; SR-704/Okeechobee Blvd (from E of Military Trail to E of Red Trail ); Project FM # 427020-1-52.01: Inspector. Project elements consisted of milling and resurfacing with friction course, ADA ramps, minor drainage, signalization, signing and pavement markings. Contact: Matt Carlock, FDOT Project Manager 561.531.8861 SEPTEMBER 2012 -MAY 2013; FDOT District 4; US -1; RRR Contract for S.R. 5/ US -1 (from SE 5TH Street to north of SR 808/Glades Road); Project FM #'s 424646-1-52-01/424646-1-52-02: Inspector. This $1.8M project included milling and resurfacing, signalization upgrades, drainage improvements, ADA & safety improvements, signing & pavement markings replacement. Contact: Scott Burrie, FDOT Project Manager 561.432.4966 MAY 2011 -JANUARY 2012; FDOT District 4; -95 Northbound (from S. of Linton Blvd. to S. of Boynton Beach Blvd.) Project FM # 426843-2-52-01: Senior Inspector. This project included milling and resurfacing 6.8 miles of 1-95. Contact: Scott Burrie, FDOT Project Manager 561.432.4966 JULY 2010 -APRIL 2011; FDOT District 4; 1-95 Southbound; Pavement Repairs (from S. of Linton Blvd. to L-30 Canal Bridge) Project FM # 426843-1-52-01: Inspector. This project included milling and resurfacing 3.9 miles of I-95. Contact: Scott Burrie, FDOT Project Manager 561.432.4966 DECEMBER 2009 -JULY 2010; FDOT District 4; SR-786/PGA Blvd.; RRR Contract; Project FM # 229396-1.52.01: Inspector. This project consisted of milling and resurfacing 2.5 miles of roadway Irnprovernents included shear lock repairs on a low level bridges, chemical grouting (soil stabilization at the bridge approaches) and tIN Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc, !E.XC(EC' !1&?NAt Si)L U TI O \STM Jason Kattwinkel;, Page 2 placement of an ARMI (Asphalt Rubber Membrane Interlayer). The project was completed with a laser profiler ride number of 4.4, Contact: Rob Cables, FDOT Project Manager 561.432.4966 DECEMBER 2009 -JULY 2010; FDOT District 4; SR 710 Beeline; RRR Contract; Project FM # 419652-1-52-01: Inspector. Project consisted of milling, resurfacing and the addition of a 5'ft paved shoulder for 1.6 miles of the Beeline Highway in Palm Beach County The contractor utilized the PaveSmart grade control system on the project for all phases of grading, milling and paving operations. The project also implemented a VECP to utilize mill material (RAP) in the base course for the paved shoulder widening. Contact: Rob Cables, FDOT Project Manager 561.432.4966 APRIL 2007 -FEBRUARY 2009; SR A1A from Broward/Palm Beach Co. Line to Downtown Palm Beach, RRR Contract; Project FM Ws 403610-1-52-01; 403603-1-52-01; 229748-1-52-01; 403604-1-52-01; 403606-1- 52-01; 403606-2-52-01: Inspector. Project was part of seven separate contracts totaling $35M for resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation along a 28 -mile corridor. This grouping required extensive public involvement and coordination with multiple municipalities, State regulatory agencies and Palm Beach County Contact: Rob Cables, FDOT Project Manager 561.432.4966 JANUARY 2007 -MARCH 2007; FDOT District 4; SR -9/I-95 (from NW 6th Street Bridge to S. end of Powerline Road Bridge); RRR Contract; Project FM #'s 231734-1-52-01 & 231735-1-52-01: Inspector Aide. Project consisted of resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation. Improvements including milling and resurfacing the existing mainline and ramp pavement, signing and pavement markings, lighting and structures (SR -9/1-95), pedestrian signalization improvements at Sunrise Boulevard and I-95, addressing safety concerns, and bringing roadway and bridge features up to the current standards. (Please note: Melvin Finch, FDOT Project Manager has retired) JANUARY 2006 -FEBRUARY 2007; FDOT District 4;SR-9/1-95 Broward County Group Projects; Project FM #'s 231736-1-52-01 & 231737-1-52-01: Inspector. Project was under four separate construction contracts covering approx. 15 miles from NW 6th Street to Palm Beach Co. Line (Powerline to McNab Road, Sample to McNab Road, Sample Road to Palm Beach County Line, and Powerline Road to Bridges). Projects included cross slope corrections on existing roadway, milling and resurfacing of mainline roadway and interchange ramps, lighting system upgrades (rewiring and luminaries), signalization, safety upgrades and bridge rehabilitation. Portions of the resurfacing also included full depth pavement reconstruction of the center lanes under traffic. (Please note: Melvin Finch, FDOT Project Manager has retired) 60 Jorge Romero Inspector Aide PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc. E r E P T I O V A L S' 0 L U T I O ,71 FEBRUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (from NW 29 Streetto NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Inspector Aide. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/1-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact: Joan Fabian, P.E., Project Oversite 111305.968.4921 61 Bradley "Brad" Mitchell Pratts ITS Senior Inspector Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. E X C EP T I O VAC. S O L UT C• C N S" PROJECT EXPERIENCE FEBRUARY 2010 - PRESENT; R&D Electric, Inc.: Technician/E1ectriciwi. Duties included installion of VMS structures, VMS signs, RTMS signs, cameras, traffic signals, street lighting and all facets of pole installation, including but not limited to controller cabinets, service points and microwave installation. JULY 2008 - DECEMBER 2009; FDOT District 6; ATLAS Traffic Management Systems, LLC: Technician/Electrician. Duties included installing street lighting, traffic signals, ITS and sign installation. APRIL 1997 - JULY 2008; FDOT District 6; MasTec: Technician/.Electrician. Duties included installion of VMS structures, VMS signs, RTMS signs, cameras, traffic signals, street lighting and all facets of pole installation, including but not limited to controller cabinets, service points and microwave installation. DECEMBER 1996 - APRIL 1997; FDOT District 6; Design Traffic Installations: Technician/Electrician. Duties included installion of span mounted traffic systems, mast arm mounted traffic signals, pedestrian signals, installation of cameras (both Interis and Traficon)VMS structures, VMS signs, RTMS signs, traffic signals, street lighting, load centers and sign structures. FEBRUARY 1990 - DECEMBER 1996; Transportation Safety Contractors: Technician/Electrician. Duties included installion of underground conduits, street lighting, traffic signals, loops, count stations, signage, signage structures and guardrail ' installation. 62 Arthur Ramsaran 11 ITS Inspector PROJECT EXPERIENCE CaIvin, Giordano 6, Associates, Inc. X C E EP T I O 4 .A L s o L U T l cD N 5 MARCH 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (from NW 29 Streetto NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Senior Inspector. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/1-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County. The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact: loan Fabian, RE., Project Oversite I11305.968.4921 JULY 2016 -MARCH 2017; FDOT District 6; General Assigned Contract; C9073; TWO #4; Project FM # 2507115-6-2-05: Lighting Inspector. Assisting the Department with various lighting inspections. Contact: Igor Dubrovskiy, FDOT Project Manager 305.640.7421 JUNE 2016- Present; FDOT District 6; SR 826/SR 836 Interchange Design Build Finance: Lighting Inspector. This project includes the design and construction of 46 bridges with over four million cubic yards of embankment. The 46 bridges consist of 32 Florida I -Beam Category 1 bridges and 14 Florida 1 -Beam and Steel Category 2 bridges (including four segmental bridges). The project scope includes 6.8 million tons of dirt removal (approximately 300,000 dump truck loads), 30 miles of concrete pile length, 16 miles of drainage pipe, 8,636 tons of reinforcing steel, 180,000 tons of asphalt, 16 miles of bridge beams, 760,000 square -feet of retaining wall, 35,000 linear feet of guardrail, and 5.7 miles of concrete wall separating traffic lanes. The project included extensive ITS improvements, fiber optic, overhead trusses, DMS signs and CCTV Contact: Claudio Diaferia, RE., FDOT Resident Engineer, 305.640,7418 NOVEMBER 2013 -JULY 2016; Florida Safety Contractors, Inc.: Traffic signal, Lighting and ITS Inspector. Duties included supervision of 7 crew members, constructing and maintaining various types of wire traffic signals, building intersections, installation of street lighting and punch list street lighting. Experience working with bucket trucks and heavy equipment. Inspection and installation of electrical panels, electrical disconnect, mast arm poles, strain poles, cable spans, signal heads, signal cabinets and components. Perform annual testing and preventative maintenance. FDOT District 4;1-595 Express Corridor Improvement 01.25 B) P3 Project: The project extended from the I-75/ Sawgrass Expressway interchange to the 1-595/I-95 interchange. The corridor improvements consisted of tolled reversible, ground -level express lanes within the median of I-595, safety modifications to the I-595/Florida Turnpike interchange, continuous connection of SR 84 between Davie Road and SR 7/ US 441, auxiliary lanes on I-595 with combined ramps, rigid pavement at the tolling sites, cross -road bypasses and grade -separated entrance and exit ramps. The project included extensive ITS improvements performed by FSC including DMS signs, toll rate signs, EMS, & fiber optic. The express lane consist of three tolled, reversible lanes, each lane is 12 feet wide with a full 10 foot shoulder on each side. Elements of construction included, drainage improvements, drill shaft inspection, MSE wall construction, lighting, milling and resurfacing, signage, earthwork, lighting, bridge inspections Calvin.., 'Giordano (7 associates., Inc, EX C F 3 felAI A . . S,�7KU 0NS` Arthur Ramsaran II, Page 2 concrete barrier wall installation, pavement markings and landscape. Client: Dragados-USA; FDOT Contact: Tomas Almonte, P.E. 786.34a9975 FDOT District 4; Broward Blvd; NW 22nd Ave and SW 1st Street Access Rd: Intersection improvements, signalization improvements, M&R, ADA ramps improvements & signing and pavement markings. These two intersection also included ITS improvements, CCTV cameras, & fiber optic. Contact: AndyPoerlo 305.807.7197 JANUARY 2013 -NOVEMBER 2013; The Signal Group Inc.: Technician/Electrician. Duties included but were not limited to; installation of conduit/underground pipes, developed and maintained street light infrastructures and drove/operated bucket trucks/forklifts, all while maintaining excellent safety standards. MAY 2010 -DECEMBER 2012; Northshore Sign Service, Inc.: Assistant Electrician. Duties included building and installation of electronic signs for variety of companies, drove/operated bucket trucks/forklifts, all while maintaining excellent safety standards. JUNE 2009 -APRIL 2010; Enterprise Electrical Contracting, Inc. (FPL Subcontractor): Apprentice/Intern. Duties included but were not limited to; rewiring/installation of street light wiring, fuses and fuse holders, street light infrastructure improvements, reconnection of electrical services, drove/operated bucket trucks/forklifts, all while maintaining excellent safety standards. JULY 2005 -FEBRUARY 2009; HDS Lighting (FPL Subcontractor): Apprentice Lineman. Duties included installation of street light wires, fuses, fuse holders, duplex for street lights and triplex for house services., street light infrastructure. Re -fuse transformers from the ground from bucket trucks, lay down pipe underground using "missile." Functioned as a locater for directional bore, drove/operated bucket trucks/forklifts, all while maintaining excellent safety standards. 64 Calvin, Giordano E Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONY David Grasso -O'Brien, LEED AP Senior Landscape Inspector SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Grasso -O'Brien is a certified Florida Landscape Inspector with more than ten years of experience and a LEED AP. He performs landscape inspections and code enforcement services for various municipalities and brings a wealth of experience in horticultural practices. He will contribute his experience in ensuring that vegetation meets grades and standards and is adequately to survive in demanding harsh environments. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Landscape Inspector, Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (April '05 - Present) • Conduct landscape inspections for Hallandale Beach Boulevard FDOT Landscape Improvements Project (September 2006). • Conduct landscape inspections for Opa Locka Executive Airport, Miami -Dade County Aviation Department Landscape Improvement Project (January to March 2007). • Conduct landscape inspections for Miami International Airport Landscape Improvement Project (January to March 2007). • Conduct landscape inspections and enforce municipal landscape codes for City of Miramar (April to August 2005). • Conduct landscape inspections and enforce municipal landscape codes for City of North Lauderdale, West Park and Weston. • Arrange and execute annual landscape inspections of commercial properties for City of Weston. Prepare reports and schedule follow up inspection for code compliance. • Meet with landscape contractors, managers and owners to discuss and educate best management practices within the City of Weston. • Meet with irrigation contractors to have them demonstrate irrigation compliance and required irrigation coverage and overlap for City of Weston, • Attend special magistrate hearings for City of Weston and City of West Park relating to tree preservation and landscape code compliance. • Monitor for invasive exotic and nuisance species of plants for City of Weston • Assist Code Compliance Department enforcing health and safety codes for City of North Lauderdale (November 2005 to January 2006). • Process tree removal and relocation permits and responsible for inspection approvals for City of West Park and. Weston, • Record GPS coordinates and identify landscape plant material in GIS format for City of Weston and the City of Lauderdale Lakes tree inventory. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 10 YEARS WITH THE FIRM O EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2008 Bachelor of Science in Agronomy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 2001 CERTIFICATIONS LICENSES Florida Nursery Growers and Landscape Association HP Cert#H67-5646 International Society of Arboriculture ISA. Municipal Specialist Certificate #FL-1336AM Florida Landscape Inspector Cert#2003-0236 FACE Code Enforcement Level Ill Certification LEED Accredited Professional BDa C PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Member of International' Society of Arboriculture Member of Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida Member of USGBC Member of Florida Association of Code Enforcement Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc, E Y e E P 'r 1 o N A L SOLUTIONS" Hien Nguyen, ASLA, ISA, FACE Senior Landscape Inspector SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Nguyen has a master's degree in landscape architecture and over ten years of experience in environmental science, botany,, and landscape architecture. She is particularly well versed in tropical plant taxonomy, physiology, morphology, economic botany, and landscape and tree preservation ordinances necessary elements in providing landscape inspections and code compliance. In addition to being skilled in typical office software programs, she is capable with AutoCAD and Adobe Photoshop. She has been the recipient of numerous awards and has received several grants. PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Weston: Revised tree preservation ordinance. City of West Park: Co-authored landscape and tree preservation ordinances. Town of Surfside: Co-authored landscape ordinance. Town of Palm Beach: Revised landscape and landscape permitting ordinance, ARBORIST, INSPECTION, TREE MITIGATION PROJECT EXPERIENCE Landscape Code Enforcement, City of Weston, FL: Enforced city landscape and tree preservation codes for compliance and presented violations to special magistrate. Landscape Review and Inspections, City of Weston, FL: Reviewed and inspected new commercial developments and redevelopment as well as single family residences to ensure code compliance. Landscape Inspection Program, City of Weston, FL: Inspect existing commercial developments for landscape compliance. Debris Removal, City of Weston, FL: Monitored and documented trucks removing debris from residential areas, Documented (measured, GPS, and calculated amount) tree stumps removed throughout the city, and evaluated trees requiring removal because of life safety issues (hazardous trees) and amount of damage done to the tree. Tree Permits, City of Weston, FL: Inspector and permit coordinator for commercial, residential and municipal tree removal and relocation permits. 96th Street/Kane Concourse, Town of Bay Harbor Islands, FL: Inspector for landscape renovations. Hardwood Hammocks Recovery after Hurricane Andrew, University of Miami: Collected soil and plant samples. Tagged, labeled, and measured plant specimens. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & OUTREACH PROJECT EXPERIENCE Roots in the City, Florida International University: As project manager, coordinated garden maintenance and four full-time employees andnational volunteer groups. Designed garden layout and wrote grants. Little Haiti Park Design Workshop: Participant of charette for multi -use park for community. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 10 YEARS WITH THE FIRM 10 EDUCATION Master of Landscape Architecture, Florida International University, Miami B.S., Environmental Studies, Florida International' University, Miami CERTIFICATIONS & LICENSES American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), No. 1087025 Florida Associationof Code Enforcement (FACE), No. 4589 ISA Certified Arborist, No. FL -5282A Level 1 Code Enforcement Certification Level II Code Enforcement Certification PROFESSIONAL, AFFILIATIONS 2002 Florida Chapter American Society of Landscape Architects Professional Merit Award for Virginia Key Beach Park and Biscayne Blueways 2001 Commendation from City of Miami Commissioner Arthur Teele, Little Haiti Park Design Workshop 2001 $25,000 Empowerment Zone Grant Overtown Horticultural Training Program Galvin, Giordano E Associates, Inc.. E 'X C E P r I O N A L SOLUTIONS' Hien Nguyen, ASLA, ISA, FACE, Page 2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & OUTREACH PROJECT EXPERIENCE Virginia Key Beach Park and Biscayne Blueway: Analyzed and provided conceptual designs that incorporated aquatic and beach front resources with historic segregated recreational areas. 67 Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL s o t U T r is ,4 's n Sandra Lee, AICP CEP, LEED AP C -D, CFM Director, Environmental Services/ ,nvi'ronmenta1 Coordinator SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Lee has over 20 years of professional experience and heads up CGA's Environmental Department. In general, Ms. Lee: provides environmental permitting services at the local, state and federal level, coordinates interagency and multi -disciplinary team efforts, provides tree mitigation plans and tree removal permitting services, conducts wetland delineations and wetland functional assessments, designs wetland mitigation areas, provides bidding and construction oversight services for the construction and installation of mitigation areas, provides technical support, environmental resource management and environmental planning services to municipalities, manages field staff conducting wildlife and habitat assessments, imperiled species surveys and compliance monitoring reporting. Before joining CGA, Ms. Lee was a Biologist with the Growth Management Division of Monroe County. During the three years that CGA provided planning and zoning services for the newly incorporated City of Marathon, she lived full- time in the Florida Keys and was responsible initially for all the environmental planning for the City of Marathon and subsequently for a full range of planning services for the City. Prior to relocating to Fort Lauderdale, Ms. Lee was a resident of the Florida Keys for 10 years where she became very familiar with the environmental sensitivities regarding the flora, fauna, land and special government programs governing and protecting the 160 -mile string of coral islands making up the Keys, a designated area of critical State concern. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING Fort Pierce. Provided the re -write of their Coastal and Conservation Elements, Parkland. Completed an extensive update of their Comprehensive Plan Conservation Element. West Park and Loxahatchee Groves. Produced the Conservation Elements for their new Comprehensive Plans after incorporation of these Towns. Martin County, St. Lucie County, Malabar, Surfside, Pahokee and Weston. Worked on. their Comprehensive Plan Evaluation, and Appraisal Reports (EAR). Weston, Parkland, Surfside, Hollywood, Pahokee, Malabar and Port St. Lucie. Worked on their EAR and the EAR based amendments to their Comprehensive Plans, Marathon. Worked extensively on the first draft of the City of Marathon's Comprehensive Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITTING EXPERIENCE Archdiocese of Miami Blessed John XX.III Religious Facility, Miramar. Responsible for environmental permitting, which included the site assessments, wetland assessments and obtaining a U.S. COE, a Broward County and two South Florida Water Management District permits; one for the development site and one for a newly constructed off- site mitigation area. Also designed the newly constructed off-site mitigation area, conducted the mitigation construction oversight and long term compliance monitoring, and the conducted maintenance oversight for the off-site mitigation area. Nearly the entirety of the development site was wetland and was comprised of multiple habitat types and qualities. The Archdiocese had previously obtained environmental resource YEARS OF EXPERIENCE. 20 YEARS WITH THE FIRM EDUCATION MA: Biology/Ecology Magna Cum Laude, St. Cloud State University, Minnesota B.A. Biology/Botany Magna Cum Laude St Cloud State University, Minnesota CERTIFICATIONS LICENSES American Institute of Certified Planners No. 018627 Green Building Certification Institute LEEN A.P BO+C NO. 10215598 Association of State Floodplain Managers CFM No. US -07579 Florida DEP Qualified Stormwater Management Inspector No. 5889 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS US Green Building Council Florida Chapter Board Officer South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Board Officer Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. EXCEPrlOMAL Sandra Lee, AICP, Page 2 permits for this project and purchased mitigation previously constructed under a prior project. However, the Archdiocese had let all permits expire and needed to again go through the entire permitting process, under new regulatory criteria. Permitting required extensive negotiation to allow previously purchased mitigation credit from a private development site to continue to apply to this project. Additional off-site mitigation was also required. Pembroke Harbor/Pembroke Cay, Pembroke Pines. Responsible for coordinating the final issuance of permits, with multiple firms, for a 170 acre residential and commercial development project that required 34 acres of on- site mitigation and the purchase of 55 mitigation bank credits. Completed the final wetland mitigation plan and planting chart, also conducted the mitigation construction oversight, the five year mitigation compliance monitoring, and the mitigation maintenance oversight. Conducted the site assessment and obtained a permit modification for a roadway extension which included additional wetland impacts and the purchase of additional mitigation bank credits. Pembroke Lakes Square/Miramar Pinelands Natural Area. Responsible for coordinating and finalizing the permitting through the US COE, Broward County and the SFWMD with mitigation plan components from multiple firms for the construction of a commercial complex in Pembroke Pines on a 26+ acre site that was entirely wetlands, also conducted the mitigation construction oversight and the five year mitigation compliance monitoring. Mitigation was constructed in Miramar within the County owned Miramar Pinelands Natural Area that was purchased with State funding. The project required a tri -party agreement with County Commission approval for mitigation construction on County park land. Also, obtaining a permit modification for additional adjacent wetlands later purchased and added to the development site; coordinated the purchase of mitigation bank credits for the additional land. Dania Basin 5 Drainage Improvements, Dania Beach, Pembroke Pines and Miramar. Designed and permitted a unique bio-swale stormwater improvement system to benefit both the developed and adjacent natural habitats. Conducted all site and wetland functional assessments for permitting and processed permits through the US COE, the South Florida Water Management District and Broward County; permitting required extensive negotiation with various Divisions of Broward County for use of County land that is designated wilderness area, mangrove habitat, and serves as a buffer to West Lake Park. The project required the development of an Agreement with the County and the City requiring approval by the County Commission. The construction of the bio-swale required unavoidable impacts to wetlands; however, the swale design included enhancements that created greater wetland functional gain than the functional loss through the impacts. The project restored historic sheet flow of freshwater to the West Lake Park habitat. Middle Beach Recreational Corridor (MBRC), Miami Beach. Conducted site inspections and plant identifications and processed a CCCL permit through the Department of Environmental Protection. The MBRC is a two mile long paver walkway connecting the existing Miami Beach Boardwalk at Indian Beach Park to the North Beach Recreational Trail at Allison Park. The path fell on state lands on coast dune habitat. The scope of work also included coastal engineering, dune planting plans, lighting design, bidding and construction administration. The ADA -accessible beach pathway supports the use of bicycles, walking, and other non - motorized means of transportation. The MBRC project is a part of the greater Atlantic Greenway Network. Intracoastal Park Seawall, Sunny Isles Beach. CGA environmental staff obtained immediate emergency authorization from the jurisdictional agencies to begin repairs on a collapsed portion of seawall along the City's Intracoastal Park and kept DERM the US COE, and DEP continuously apprised of all activity. CGA quickly responded to the City's request for design, permitting and construction inspection of the emergency demolition and replacement. Due to the age and deteriorated state, the entire 669 linear feet of seawall was replaced. CGA expedited the permit review process while the Contractor was on-site performing emergency repairs. 69 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. rxcEPrIoNAt soLurioNs- Patrick Murphy Environmental Specialist II SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Murphy has over 8 years of professional experience and assists the CGA Environmental Department in regulatory permitting, environmental planning, site assessments, resource management and environmental technical support services. Before joining CGA, Mr. Murphy was a Senior Project Biologist with The Chappell Group, Inc. During the seven years at The Chappell Group, Inc. Mr. Murphy was responsible for various environmental services for private and public entities. Included in Mr. Murphy's responsibilities were environmental permitting, project management, project delegation, report writing, wetland jurisdictional determinations, environmental feasibility studies, construction observation, mitigation design, mitigation monitoring, benthic resource surveys, marine turtle lighting surveys and permitting, and permit compliance. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITTING *Natalie's Cove, Cooper City, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), Broward County Environtnental Protection and Growth Management Department (Broward County), and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) to increase lake area and create a littoral shelf from uplands, by excavating along the edge of the shoreline of existing stormwater management lake, and install two (2) new outfalls. Environmental permitting services included a tree survey and preparation of environmental plans and applications. *Emergency Access/ Ped, Bridge (Seawall), Sunny Isles Beach, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Miami -Dade County, and SFWMD to replace an existing seawall as a part of the overall construction of a bridge to connect North Bay Road between NE 172 Street and NE 174 Street. Environmental permitting services included preparation of environmental applications and review/editing of plans for submittal. Port Bridge over FPL Discharge Canal, Port Everglades, FL: Performed environmental permitting for a new bridge over the FPL discharge canal to alleviate transport and cruise passenger congestion on Eller Drive, and to allow better access to the east container yard. Included the responsibilities was an environmental assessment, construction inspection, and obtaining USACOE, Broward County and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permits. As a result of mangrove impacts a mangrove planter was designed, permitted and required quarterly/annual site inspections. Alsdorf Park, Pompano Beach, FL: Performed environmental permitting for improvements to the existing boat ramp and site parking lot at Alsdorf Park, Responsibilities included an environmental assessment, preparation of conceptual designs for improvements to the existing boat ramps and parking lot utilizing AutoCAD, benthic and bathymetric assessments, tree appraisal, and obtaining USACOE, Broward County and FDEP permits. All permits were obtained andthe project is waiting for grant funding to be constructed. Dania Beach Marina, Dania Beach, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Broward County, and FDEP for a new seawall, proposedredesign of an existing public marina and dredging within Whiskey Creek. in. Dania Beach. Environmental permitting services included a full benthic resource survey, design and permitting of the proposed marina redesign and dredging, CCCL/seaturtle lighting YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 8 YEARS WITH THE FIRM 1 year EDUCATION Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science CERTIFICATIONS & LICENSES International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist: FL -6225A Certified PADI Open Water Diver #14040L1452 PROFESSIONAL. AFFILIATIONS International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), Member South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (SFAEP), Member Society of Wetland Scientist (SWS), Member Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' Patrick Murphy, Page 2 permitting, and construction observation/permit compliance. All permits were obtained and the redesigned marina and dredging were completed per the permitted specifications in 2013. Pompano Canal Development (Atlantic Yacht Club Villas), Pompano Beach, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Broward County, and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) with mitigation plan components for the excavation of an artificial basin from uplands for a proposed marina and construction of an upland walkway along the Pompano Canal, Environmental permitting services included a full benthic resource survey, upland site assessment, design and permitting of the proposed marina and mangrove removal and protection. The Oceanage - Marina Redesign, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Broward County, and the SFWMD for a proposed redesign of an existing private marina along Mayan Lake in Fort Lauderdale. Environmental permitting services included a full benthic resource survey, upland site assessment, design and permitting of the proposed marina redesign, bathymetric survey for potential dredging, and construction observation/permit compliance. All permits were obtained and the redesigned marina was constructed per the permitted specifications in 2013. Sunrise Harbor, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Broward County, and FDEP for the maintenance dredging of an existing private marina within Coral Bay in Fort Lauderdale. Environmental permitting services included a full benthic resource survey, design and permitting of the proposed dredging, and construction observation/permit compliance. All permits were obtained for the proposed dredging while the dredging was completed per the permitted specifications in 2012. Shooters Waterfront, Fort Lauderdale, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Broward County, FDEP, and FL Division of State Lands for a proposed replacement of the existing seawall and dock for an existing restaurant along the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) in Fort Lauderdale. Environmental permitting services included a full benthic resource survey, upland site assessment, design and permitting, bathymetric survey, obtaining a new submerged land lease through Division of State Lands, and permit compliance. All permits were obtained and the new dock and seawall were constructed per the permitted specifications in 2014. Various Single -Family Docks, Tri -County Area, FL: Performed environmental permitting through the USACOE, Broward County, FDEP, and Miami -Dade County Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) for well over one hundred projects including docks, seawalls, and dredging. Environmental permitting services included a full benthic resource survey, bathymetric surveys, design and permitting, obtaining submerged land leases or private easements through Division of State Lands, and permit compliance. BENTHIC/SEAGRASS SURVEYS *Bermuda Cay Seawall, Boynton Beach, FL: Conducted a full benthic/seagrass survey for the replacement of existing seawall and potential construction of a new private marina. Prepared a summary report of findings for submittal to and review by the client. This survey was completed utilizing snorkeling equipment. *Sunny Isles Beach Pier - Submerged Lands Cleanup, Sunny Isles, FL: Conduced quarterly survey/cleanup events beneath and along the Sunny Isles Beach Pier. The survey/cleanup events are required by FDEP as a part of the reconstruction of the Sunny Isles Beach pier. Prepared summary reports of findings for submittal to and review by FDEP. These surveys/cleanups were completed utilizing SCUBA and snorkeling equipment. Port Everglades Turning Notch, Port Everglades, FL: Conducted a full benthic survey for the removal of an existing riprap embankment. The survey area included the existing riprap embankment within the existing turning notch and along the ICW. Prepared a summary report of findings for submittal to and review by the client. This survey was completed utilizing SCUBA equipment. 71 Kathy Jeffrey Resident Compliance Specialist PROJECT EXPERIENCE Calvin, Giordano v Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL S O L U TIO u S" FEBRUARY 2017 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; D/B; SR 9A/I-95 (from NW 29 Streetto NW 131 Street); Project FM # 429300-3-62-01: Senior Inspector. The Improvements under this Design -Build Contract consist of the replacement / reconstruction of all concrete and/or Rigid pavement surface on SR -9/I-95 from north of NW 29th Street (M.P. 4.253) to north of NW 79th Street (M.P 7.294) in Miami -Dade County. The project will reconstruct 3.041 miles of SR-9A/I-95 mainline pavement, shoulder pavement, on and off ramp improvements, & drainage infrastructure improvements including trench drains to resolve spread related issues. In addition, the project includes the construction of Express Lanes Emergency Stopping Sites in the median at 5 locations between NW 62nd St (MP 6.213) and NW 131st St. (MP 10.511). Contact: Joan Fabian, P.E., Project Oversite 111305.968.4921 JANUARY 2015 -JANUARY 2017; City of Pompano Beach; MLK (Hammondville Road) Improvements (from Poweriine Road to Turnpike) Project FM # 432861- 1-58-01 (LAP Funded $ 2,855,802): Resident Compliance Specialist. Improvements include roadway widening, sidewalk installation, drainage improvements, milling and resurfacing, lighting, median installation, signage, landscaping, irrigation and pavement markings. Contact: Horacio Danovich, Project Manager 954.786,7834 JULY 2015 -FEBRUARY 2016; FDOT District 4; Washout-SRA1A (from South of NE 14 Court to NE 19 Street); Project FM # 433688-4-62-01: Resident Compliance Specialist. SR A1A, located in the City of Fort Lauderdale will be reconstructed from south of NE 14th Street to north of 18th Street. The improvements will tie in with Sunrise Blvd to the south. Improvements consist of milling and resurfacing, new drainage system with exfiltration trench on north end of project, construction of two signalized pedestrian crosswalks (NE 15th Court and NE 17th Street from Birch State Park), drilled shaft, mast arm installation, bike lanes in both directions, decorative turtle friendly pedestrian lighting and paver sidewalks on both sides of street, beach front promenade on east side that includes decorative wall with accent lighting and 17 decorative beach entrances with shower stalls. Contact: Yveins Jean-Pierre, P.E., Construction Project Oversight III 954.940.7611 MAY 2015 -PRESENT; Department of Environmental Protection; Kemp Channel Span Replacement; Project FM # 418396-1, FDEP Project # FS050: Resident Compliance Specialist: Project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. Construction of the Kemp Channel Bridge Span replacement and retrofitting, located at approximately Mile Marker 23.5. This project is to be a portion of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail State Park as described in the approved Trail Master Plan dated August 2000. Contact: James Post, FDEP Project Manager 305.853.3571 JULY 2012 -JULY 2015; FOOT District 4; SR 710/Beeline Hwy (from west of Congress Avenue to west of Australian Avenue); Project FM # 229897.2.62.01:. Resident Compliance Specialist/AssistantContractSupportSpecialist. The improvements for this project include widening roadway from 2 to 4 lanes, pond excavations, demucking, earthwork, utility relocations, drainage, milling and resurfacing, lighting, signalization, drill shaft inspection, infrastructure improvements, ADA compliance, environmental compliance, pond construction, landscaping, irrigation and signage. These capacity improvement expanded port access to better accommodate head Calvin, 'Giordan0 Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL Kathy Jeffrey, Page 2 truck volumes that traverse this section of the locally known Parson Heights community. Contact: Rob Cables, FDOT Project Manager 561.719.7799 MARCH 2011 -SEPTEMBER 2012; FDOT District 4 (Federally Funded); SR 5/ CIS 1(from north of Glades Road to south of Yamato Road / SR 808/Glades Road) west of 1-95 to NW 7th Avenue/SR 804/Boynton Beach Blvd. (from east of Hagen Ranch to west of Jog Road) Project FM #'s 422910-1-62.01/4216844.62.01/422991-1- 62-01: Resident Compliance Specialist. Project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. Project elements included milling and resurfacing, earthwork, shoulder widening, drainage improvements, curb and gutter, slope reconstruction and revetment, ADA improvements, sidewalk and guardrail installation. Contact: Jacques Beaubrun 561.432.4966 APRIL 2009 -DECEMBER 2010; FDOT District 4; SR 700/US 98/ Conners (from Old 700 Alignment to Old Conners Highway); SR 729/St. Market Road to SR 15: Resident Compliance Specialist/Assistant Contract Support Specialist. Scope included 15 miles of milling and resurfacing, shoulder widening, drainage improvements, curb and gutter, slope reconstruction, ADA improvements, sidewalks, guardrails and "hot in place" paving placement. Contact:. Jacques Beaubrun, Project Manager 561.432.4966 MAY 2009 -JUNE 2010; FDOT District 4 (Federally Funded); Palm Beach Operations General CEJ Consultant Construction Support; US -27 Milling & Resurfacing: Resident Compliance Specialist In-house project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. Contact: Stacey Sasaki, Project Manager 561.432.4966 JUNE 2007 -DECEMBER 2008; FDOT District 4 (Federally Funded); ALA Corridor in Palm Beach County: Resident Compliance Specialist. Project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. This major 3R construction project consisted of seven (7) individual projects along A1A from Boca Raton to the Town of Palm Beach in Palm Beach County Contact: Stacey Sasala, Project Manager 561.432.4966 MAY 2005 -APRIL 2007; FDOT District 4 (Federally Funded); 1-95 Milling and Resurfacing: Resident Compliance Specialist. Project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. Project consisted of milling and resurfacing I-95 (approximately 15 miles in Broward County) from the I-595 interchange to the Broward County/Palm Beach County line. Included new signalization at the interchange ramps, lighting improvements and safety improvements. (Please note: Melvin Finch, FDOT Project Manager has retired) DECEMBER 2003 -MAY 2005; FDOT District 4 (Federally Funded); 1-95 HOV, Delray Beach: Resident Compliance Specialist. Project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. Project involved the complete reconstruction of 6.2 kilometers of 1-95 from south of Linton Boulevard to the LWDD L-30 Canal in Delray Beach. Elements of construction included milling and resurfacing, pile driving, drill shaft, signalization. The $49,000,000.00 project also included reconstruction of 10 bridges, as well as, the expansion of Linton Boulevard and Atlantic Avenue adjacent to I-95. Contact ScottBurri:e 561.434.3900 DECEMBER 2001 -DECEMBER 2003; FDOT District 4 (Federally Funded); SR 845 (Powerline Road) from SR 834 (Sample Road) to SR 869 (Sawgrass Expressway): Resident Compliance Specialist. Project monitoring of EEO/ DBE and OJT. This project included major roadway reconstruction that involved widening from 4 to 6 lanes, composite concrete pavement, resurfacing, signalization, roadway lighting, landscaping, and utility relocation for approximately 2.2 miles. (Please note: Melvin Finch, FDOT Project Manager has retired) NOVEMBER 1998 -MAY 2000; FDOT District 4; SR -84 (Alligator -Alley) Rest Area: Resident Compliance Specialist. Project monitoring of EEO/DBE and OJT. (Please note: Melvin Finch, FDOT Project Manager has retired) 73 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. E (L E P T I O V A L S O L O T I O 4 s" Karen Russell Contract Compliance Specialist SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Ms. Russell has over 20 years of office administrative I secretarial experience with specialized training in FDOT construction office and EEO DBE compliance work. Karen is currently the District Compliance Specialist at the FDOT District 6 office performing audits on ALL CEI projects for EEO Compliance. She also assists and conducts construction contract compliance administration field office reviews for consultant CEI staff and the FDOT residency Included in this are work methods and record keeping determining compliance with procedures, laws, contract requirements and standard practices. Identify deficiencies, report such findings and recommend actions to reconcile and instruct and monitor corrective action. Other experience includes CQR data input and other construction computer programs and word-processing. PROJECT EXPERIENCE MARCH 2012 -PRESENT; FDOT District 6; General Assigned Contract; C9073; TWO #1; Project FM # 2507115-6-2-05; District Contract Compliance Specialist. Review and report Residency Monitoring of Contractor Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), On -The -Job Training (OJT) and Wages Compliance on Construction Contracts. Maintain and apply comprehensive and practical knowledge of Federal Laws, Florida Statues, Federal Highway Administration requirements, and FOOT procedures. Communicate with Contractors, Consultants and Department Staff trends, deficiencies and potential problems with the above four (4) Program Areas. Contact: Stanley Ford, Contract Compliance Manager 305.640.7459 2007-FEBRUARY2012; FDOT District 6; Miami Intermodal Center (MTC): Resident Compliance Specialist. The Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) was comprised of ground access improvements to and within Miami International Airport (MIA). Major project elements included: Miami Central Station (MCS) - Intermodal center for transit (Metrorail), commuter rail (Tri -Rail), Amtrak, and intercity bus services; Rental Car Center (RCC) - New rental car facility consolidating rental car operations at the airport and providing space for 10,000 cars; MIA Mover - Automated airport people mover to connect MIA to the MCS and RCC and Various roadway improvements to improve airport access. Contact: lsa Nunez, P.E., Project Manager 305.470.5771 Various FDOT District 4 & District 6 Projects: Resident Compliance Specialist Responsible for all EEO/DBE/OJT documentation of all major interchange project documents. Additional responsibilities include EDMS data in -put, fielding telephone calls, using various data bases to track vehicles and calculate mileage for FOOT audits, record and classify applicants, oversee technical certifications for all FOOT documentation, engineering and inspection administration and field personnel. 2006-2007; FDOT District 4; General Assigned CEI Construction Services; Palm Beach County: Contact: Stacey Sasala, Project Manager 954.777.4382 2003-2006; FDOT District 6; NW 36th Street Interchange: Contact: Mario Cabrera, Senior Project Engineer 305.470.5771 1999-2003; FDOT District 6; Biscayne Boulevard VII 1995-1998; FDOT District 4; Pembroke Road 74 Calvin, Giordano g EXCEPTIONAL Steven M. Watts, PSM Director of Survey/Surveyor' SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Watts has 26 years of experience as a surveyor and mapper. Having spent his entire surveying career working in Broward County, he is extremely knowledgeable of the rules, requirements and specifications for completing surveying and mapping projects in the South Florida area. He specializes in architectural and engineering design type surveys, land acquisition, easements, title research, and computer mapping. Associates, Inc. Sol u F 1 o N S' & Mapper PROJECT EXPERIENCE Director of Survey - Calvin, Giordano, & Associates, Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL: As Director of Survey he is responsible and . involved in all aspects of the company's surveying and mapping projects. General Surveying & Mapping Services - City of Pompano Beach, FL: Boundary & Topographic Surveys: Community Park, Canal Point Park; Legal Descriptions: Avondale Fishing Piers; Topographic Surveys: Pompano Beach Air Park; Taxiway "N" - Pavement Widening, Runway 15- Runway Protection Zone, Magnetic Heading, Runways 6-24, 15- 33 and 10-28. Date 2006-2014. Survey Fees: $125,000 General Surveying & Mapping Services - City of North Lauderdale, FL: Boundary and Topographic Surveys, As -Built Surveys, Legal Descriptions, City Limit Determinations and General Surveying Services for the City of North Lauderdale. Additional responsibilities include project surveyor for the topographic survey of the municipal complex, GIS, water control district and utility mapping, Hampton Pines Park and Silver Lakes Middle School ball field renovation. Dates: 2003-2014, Survey Fees: $160,000. General Surveying & Mapping Services - City of Coral Springs, FL: Boundary and Topographic Surveys, As -Built Surveys, Legal Descriptions, Design Surveys, Construction Stakeout, and General Surveying Services for the City of Coral Springs. Dates: 2008-2014, Survey Fee: $45,000. General Surveying & Mapping Services - City of Coconut Creek, FL: Boundary, Topographic and Design Survey for Facilities Maintenance Area and Copans Road for the City of Coconut Creek. Dates: 2010-2013, Survey Fees: $15,000, GIS Base Mapping- Broward County Property Appraiser's Office, FL: Property Appraiser's GIS -Base Mapping Projects. Work completed to date includes City of Pompano Beach, City of Fort Lauderdale, City of Margate, City of Miramar, and City of Dania. Projects involved precise coordinate geometry mapping and conversion to Arc- Info polygon coverage. Dates: 2003-2005, Survey Fees: $235,000. [INSERT SERVICE TYPE] EXPERIENCE Project, Name, City, State: Overall description of the project with specific detail on. employees responsibilities. EDUCATION BSLS, Purdue University, 1984 Lambda Sigma: Land Surveying; Honorary. CERTIFICATIONS & LICENSES Florida PSM No. 4588 Calvin,, Giordano g Associates, Inc. E X C E P T 9 O N ,1 L SOLUTIONS' Michael M. Mossey, PSM Surveyor /Mapper SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Mossey has 25 years of experience in land surveying and mapping in South Florida. He has performed construction, right of way, control, ALTA, and boundary and topographic (both acreage and coastal) surveys. He is knowledgeable in the use of a wide range of state-of-the-art surveying equipment and associated computer technologies. He has extensive experience in field crew supervision, quality control and client relations. EXPERIENCE Survey project manager for City of Ft. Lauderdale redevelopment of approximately 20 -square miles of infrastructure in Broward County, Including Miami Road Project, Septic Areas 3 and 4, Wastewater Treatment plants and the Sistrunk Boulevard project. Survey project manager for North Andrews Gardens Improvement District, a Neighborhood Improvement Program undertaken by Broward County. Survey project manager for a variety of retail and commercial projects including Home Depot USA, Inc. and Muvico Theaters. Boundary, as -built and construction stakeout surveys for Weston (Arvida) for 10 years. Survey project manager for South Florida Water Management District's STRIVE (Structure Information Verification) Program: Provided various survey services including as -built and water control structure surveys in St. Lucie, Miami -Dade, Palm Beach and Monroe Counties. Survey project manager for Florida Power & Light Company at the Port St. Lucie Nuclear Plant: Provided survey support services for FPL's replacement of the Cask Cranes on the reactor waste buildings. YEARS OE EXPERIENCE" 25+ YEARS WITH THE FIRM <1 EDUCATION Maryville College, Maryville, Tennessee CERTIFICATIONS & LICENSES Florida PSM No. 5660 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Florida Society of Professional Surveyors Mappers Secretary, Broward Chapter, FSMS, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. E X C E F T I O N A L SOLUTIONS' Pablo Dominguez Survey CADD Technician SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Dominguez has 17 years of experience as a surveyor and mapper. Having spent his entire surveying career working in South Florida, he is extremely knowledgeable of the rules, requirements and specifications for completing surveying and mapping projects in the South Florida area. He specializes in Digital Terrain Mapping (DTM) type surveys, design surveys, right of way surveys, hydrographic surveys, 3D laser scanning surveys as well as construction stake out projects, land acquisition and computer mapping. SURVEY MAPPING EXPERIENCE GIS System, Key West, FL: Location of all power poles and transformer pads belonging to Keys Energy between mile marker 1 (Key West) thru mile marker 40 (Big Pine Key) along US -1 and community roads for purpose of GIS map also including Tank Island. Utilizing GPS Handheld and GPS RTK instruments. General Surveying & Mapping Services, Pompano Beach, FL: Location and elevations of all drainage structures within the city of Pompano Beach including inverts, pipes and boxes material and sizes for drainage study to improve drainage system. For the city of Pompano Beach, Fl. General Surveying & Mapping Services, Miami Beach, FL: 3D laser scanning of Fontainebleau Hotel interior and exterior walls for the purpose of generating civil plans to refurbish the historic look. General Surveying & Mapping Services, Marathon, FL: Drainage survey for the city of Marathon, Fl. To include the recovery/ reset of primary network control, location of all drainage structures, measure inverts, check cross sections along US -1 for FDOT General Surveying & Mapping Services, Islamorada, FL: Drainage survey for the city of Marathon, Fl. To include the recovery/ reset of primary network control, location of all drainage structures, measure inverts, check cross sections along US -1 for FDOT [INSERT DISCPLINE NAME] EXPERIENCE Project Name, City, State: Overall descriptionof the project with specific detail on employees responsibilities. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 17 YEARS WITH THE FIRM 5 EDUCATION Miami Dade College; Julio De Blas, PE, CWI Regional Engineer Year started with PSI: 2016 Years' experience with other firms: 16 Education • Spanish Ministry of Education Civil Engineering Degree Equivalency, Madrid, Spain, 2011 • MBA, Florida International University, Florida, 2007 • MS, Civil Engineering University of Miami, Florida, 2000 • BS, Civil Engineering, University of Miami, Florida, 1999 Certifications/Registrations/Technical Training • Professional Engineer, #64653, Florida, 2006 • Professional Engineer, #29039, Spain, 2011 • American Welding Society (AWS) Certified Welding Inspector (C.W.I) Certification # 11111231 • FDOT CTAP LBR Technician • ACI Aggregate Base Testing Technician PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE SUMMARY As Regional Engineer, Mr. De Blas is the principal technical responsible for Geotechnical and Construction Services for all of our South Florida offices. He has a Bachelor's and Master's degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Miami and an MBA from FIU. Julio brings over 16 years in the fields of Geotechnical and Construction Services. His geotechnical experience includes subsurface investigations throughout South Florida, particularly in Miami -Dade County, and preparation and review of geotechnical reports. Specifically, his experience includes multiple projects involving force and water main design and construction including microtunneling crossings, WWTP and WTP upgrades (e.g. storage tanks, buildings, and other infrastructure), pump/lift stations, and monitoring wells. Other geotechnical experience includes retaining earth systems (i.e. sheet piles, MSE walls, etc.), foundation design and construction (shallow & deep foundations), slope stability, groundwater monitoring, and soil improvement methods (e.g. chemical grouting, compaction grouting, soil mixing, etc.). Mr. De Blas is experienced using geotechnical finite element modeling (PLAXIS 3D) for complex geotechnical issues and has implemented it successfully in several projects. His construction materials testing and quality control experience consists of soils -earthwork, concrete and grout, spray fire resistive materials, masonry, and other destructive and non-destructive testing. He also has over 9 years of experience as a structural special inspector for numerous projects and has performed multiple welding inspections (CWI) in accordance with AWS D1.1 both in the field and fabrication shops. REPRESENTATIVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SR 907 (Alton Road) PD&E Study, Miami -Dade County, Florida (2014-2016) Senior Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning and executing the field exploration and laboratory testing programs, interpreting the test results, performing foundation analyses and design of bridges, signs and signalization structures, and roadway soil survey. SR 93/1-75 Express Lanes (Segment "E"), Broward County, Florida (2013-2014) Senior Engineer and EOR involved the field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical studies. Provided geotechnical recommendations for roadway, sign structures, culverts, sound walls and other project components. FDOT Districtwide Geotechnical Services, District 4, Contract No. C -8T51 (2009-2014) Project and Senior Engineer and EOR involved the field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical studies. Provided geotechnical recommendations for roadway, bridge structures, MSE walls, etc., through multiple task work orders. Intertek 78 Julio De Bias, PE, CWI Regional Engineer Miami -Dade College — West Campus, Miami -Dade County, Florida (2012-2013) Special Inspector for Materials Testing and Welding Inspector: Services performed consisted of inspections of welded structural connections and materials testing and inspection consisting of sprayed fire resistive materials, concrete testing, soil density testing, and Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on critical welds. Orion Jet Center, Opa-Locka Airport, Miami -Dade -County, Florida (2013-2014) Special Inspector and Welding Inspector for airport private terminal at Opa-Locka Executive Airport. Services consisted of performing structural inspections including welded inspections in accordance with AWS D1,1 Code. Zara Lincoln Road, Miami Beach, Florida (2014) — Special inspector and welding Inspector for welded structural connections, helical pile installation monitoring, and materials testing consisting of sprayed fire resistive materials, concrete testing, soil density testing, and Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on critical welds. Broward County Courthouse, Broward County, Florida (2009-2012) Senior Engineer/Engineer of Record for augercast pile foundation Toad testing, pile installation monitoring, grout testing and foundation certification. Load tests performed consisted of Osterberg testing on the 30 -inch dia. piles, and conventional static Toad testing on 18 -inch dia. piles. Tension and lateral Toad tests were also performed on the piles. SR 862/Eller Drive ICTF, Broward County, Florida (2008-2011) Senior Project Engineer involved in the roadway field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical recommendations. SR 836/MDX at Station 161+33.92, Miami -Dade County, Florida — Senior Engineer involved in the geotechnical evaluation and structural assessment of drainage structure/deep injection well S-40. SR5/South Federal Highway Henry E. Kinney Tunnel Feasibility Study, Broward County, Florida: Senior Engineer involved in the evaluation of the proposed additions/modifications to the existing tunnel structure. The scope included geotechnical data collection and review, geotechnical Fine Element Modeling, analysis based on existing soil and structural conditions, and engineering reporting. MDWS 60 -inch Diameter Force Main from South Miami Heights Water Treatment Plant to the Intersection of SW 212th Street and Old Cutler Road, Miami -Dade County, Florida (2008) Senior Engineer involved in the field exploration, laboratory testing, geotechnical engineering evaluations and recommendations for the construction of the 60 -inch force main including 400 linear feet of microtunneling. MDWS Pump Station Upgrades (Nos. 108, 177, 638, 795, etc.) Several Sites throughout Miami -Dade County (2009-2010) Senior Engineer involved the field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical recommendations for pump station upgrades including wet -wells, submersible pumps, and associated force mains. City of North Miami Beach -Norwood Oeffler Water Treatment Plant Water Expansion Program, Miami -Dade County (2002-2003) Project Engineer involved the field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical recommendations for the WTP expansion including new high capacity storage tanks, pump stations, and other structures. MDT North Corridor Extension Miami -Dade County, Florida (2007-2008) Senior Geotechnical Engineer responsible for planning and executing the field exploration and laboratory testing programs, interpreting the test results, performing multiple foundation analyses for drilled shaft including post -grouted drilled shafts. Project consisted of an extensive field exploration and geotechnical design of approximately 450 redundant and non -redundant drill shafts to support the elevated guide -way. Intertek 79 Paul Passe, PE, CPM Chief Geotechnical Engineer Year started with PSI: 2001 Years' experience with other firms: 23 Education: BS, Civil Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Platteville, 1978 Certifications/Registrations/ Technical Training • Licensed Professional Engineer: #34750, Florida, 1984; #15265, Alabama, 1984; #16667, Minnesota, 1982; #21569, Wisconsin, 1982 • Certified Public Manager Affiliations/Memberships: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Key Qualifications • Expert in his field with over 36 years of experience • Former FDOT State Geotechnical Engineer/Senior Reviewer • Responsible for detailing specifications, setting product pile lengths and providing driving criteria using Wave Equation Analysis Program, Pile Driving Analyzer, CAPWAP® and for verification of testing on design - build projects. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Passe has over 36 years of experience in the field of geotechnical engineering and materials testing, 13 of which were spent working directly with the Florida Department of Transportation. He spent four of those years as District Geotechnical Engineer, responsible for assignment of project managers in design and construction, and the other eight as the State Geotechnical Engineer, acting as Senior Reviewer and troubleshooter for projects state wide as well as providing guidance and leadership for geotechnical policy and procedures for the FDOT. He has also given numerous presentations for the FDOT at conferences and seminars, and helped develop geotechnical -related specifications and training courses. Paul serves on Geotechnical Institute, Transportation Research Board and National Cooperative Highway Research Program task forces, committees, and panels. As the State Geotechnical Engineer for the Florida Department of Transportation in Tallahassee, Mr. Passe was responsible for planning, directing and coordinating the state geotechnical unit for providing statewide geotechnical design procedures and guidelines, writing construction specifications and handling of geotechnical research contracts. He was also responsible for the review of geotechnical engineering investigations and reports from both in-house and consultant forces for all transportation phases — design, construction and maintenance. Since joining PSI, Mr. Passe has been involved in determining design criteria for the high-speed railroad, provided statewide training for consultant engineering inspectors, state inspectors at construction workshops. He has been responsible for detailing specifications, setting product pile lengths and providing driving criteria using Wave Equation Analysis Program, Pile Driving Analyzer, CAPWAP® and for verification of testing on design build projects. Mr. Passe continues to assist the FDOT Districts 1-6 with geotechnical issues including ground vibration monitoring, pile driving analysis and other engineering instrumentation, testing, and monitoring issues. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Florida Turnpike Enterprises District Wide Contract — Chief Engineer responsible for reviewing vibration monitoring data for roadway and structure construction, reviewing certification packages and verification testing for deep foundations. Intertek 80 Paul Passe, PE, CPM Chief Geotechnical Engineer 1-10 over Escambia Bay, Pensacola, Florida — Chief Engineer part of the CEI team for FDOT District 3; Responsibilities included review of geotechnical data/recommendations and verification testing of piling for bridge replacements. Role: Chief Geotechnical Engineer Dates: 06/05-10/08 Reference: Bryan Estock, PE, (850) 777-8761 1-95 (SR 9) Roadway Widening in Indian River County, FL (10 miles) — Project Engineer for geotechnical work including roadway widening, bridge widening, ponds and studies relating to noise wall. Role: Project Engineer Dates: September 2008 -March 2009 Client: FDOT District IV and VI Materials Office, Mr. Terrence Walters, 954- 677-7019 Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport, Runway Expansion — Currently serving as the Chief Engineer of the QAMT contract for the extension of Runway 10-28. In this role, he has overseen the PDA verification and analysis of the 2600+ concrete piles driven to support the tunnel and bridge structures over US 1. Dates: 05/2011-12/2014 Florida Power & Light Proposed Overtown-Venetian Transmission Line — Provided exploratory information in connection with the proposed FPL Overtown-Venetian Transmission line project. The proposed method of installation of the transmission line was by horizontal direction drilling (HDD) to minimize impacts to the submerged aquatic resources in Biscayne Bay, Cut and cover methods were evaluated for the landside portions (Miami Beach) of the project. Obtained subsurface soils information needed to complete the transmission line design and to determine the most appropriate depth for the transmission line installation. PST's services included obtaining data regarding the general subsurface conditions along the proposed alignments by means of exploratory borings (SPT and rock core), as well as laboratory testing of the collected samples. The laboratory testing was conducted for classification purposes and to provide pertinent engineering characteristics of the material. Role: Chief Geotechnical Engineer Dates: June 2007 -December 2014 Design -Build: 1-95 Roadway Widening in Brevard County, FL — Chief Geotechnical Engineer for subsurface investigation, lab -testing program pile, foundation design, analysis of PDA test data and issuance of pile certification documents. Project included a bridge widening over Eau Gallie Blvd. and Lake Washington Road, bridge over US -17/92 (SR 500), Pineda Causeway Interchange over 1-95 and Wickham Road Bridge. Role: Chief Geotechnical Engineer Dates: 02/08-03/09 Client: Jacobs Engineering, Sean Moore, PE, (813) 977-3434 Design -Build: 1-75 Roadway Widening (IROX) Lee & Collier Counties, FL — Chief Geotechnical Engineer reviewing the subsurface investigation, laboratory -testing program pile, foundation design, engineering analysis, report preparation, and analysis of PDA test data. The iROX project involved the expansion of 1-75 through Collier and Lee counties in Florida. The project has several components including: Resurfacing and widening of 30 miles of I- 75 from four lanes to six lanes from Golden Gate Parkway in Collier County to Colonial Blvd. in Lee County; addition of 12 ft. travel lane and 10 ft paved shoulders; Reconstructing the Immokalee Road interchange in Collier County; Coordination with adjacent projects in the corridor including the Regional Traffic Management Center/ITS project, Lee County Estero Parkway extension bridge, I-75/Bonita Beach Rd interchange and 1-75 from Colonial Blvd to SR 82 widening. The six lanes were open one year ahead of schedule, and the I- 75/Immokalee Road Interchange opened nine months ahead of schedule. Cost: $458M Dates: 03/2007-12/2009 Client: Florida Department of Transportation District 1, Terry Puckett, PE, District Geotechnical Office, Districts One and Seven Materials, (863)-519-4246 and David Richey, PE (FDOT PM), 863-519-4246 Veterans Expressway section 4, Tampa, Florida — Provided geotechnical engineering and consultant services for the design, widening and resurfacing of the SR 589 (Veterans Expressway) section 4 from south of Gunn Highway to the Sugarwood Mainline All -Electronic Tolling Gantry Plaza. Work included walls, bridges and toll gantries. Reference: Jennifer Lewis, TY Lin, 407-484-3154 Intertek grfjil 81 Paul Passe, PE, CPM Chief Geotechnical Engineer Turnpike at 1-4 Interchange, Orange County, Florida - Provided geotechnical engineering and consultant services for the design, of the proposed Turnpike Mainline at 1-4 Interchange Improvements. Work included roadway, walls and bridges. Reference: Steve Boylan, GAI Consultants, Inc., 407-423-8398 Polk Parkway and Pace Road Interchange Improvements, Polk County, Florida - Chief Engineer responsible for reviewing of the subsurface investigation, laboratory -testing program, engineering analysis and report preparation for roadway soil survey and existing bridge structure replacement. Also, responsible for reviewing of the foundation certification documents. Reference: Greg Smith, DRMP Inc., 407-896-0594 Port of Miami Tunnel (SR A1A), Preliminary Feasibility Study, Miami -Dade County, FL (2 miles) Chief Engineer involved in the preparation of numerous Geotechnical Data Reports compiling the results of the field and lab tests associated with the geotechnical works on land and in water. Field work involved extensive permitting and coordination with various government and environmental entities. Role: Project Engineer Dates: August 2003 to on-going Client: Mr. Steve Dusseault, P.E., P.G., PB America, 305-514-3122 Venetian Causeway Bridge, Miami -Dade County - Chief Engineer responsible for reviewing of the subsurface investigation, laboratory -testing program, engineering analysis and report preparation for roadway soil survey and structures reports. Performed design calculations, pilot hole boring program, determined production shaft lengths and resolved construction issues with shaft installation. Project consisted of a replacement bridge over Biscayne Bay on approximately 50 -foot long, 54 -inch diameter drilled shafts Crosstown Connector, Tampa, FL — Chief Engineer responsible for reviewing of the subsurface investigation, laboratory -testing program, engineering analysis and report preparation for roadway soil survey and structures reports. The project is a limited -access interchange between the Lee Roy Selmon Expressway and Interstate 4. The ultimate design of the interchange project includes 26 bridges on drilled shaft foundations, among which are existing bridges to be modified, as well as new bridges, and retaining walls. Extensive Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall analyses were also performed. PSI provided geotechnical engineering design services and has also provided extensive post design services. Clearwater Memorial Causeway Bridge (S.R. 60), Pinellas County - Chief Engineer responsible for reviewing of the subsurface investigation, laboratory -testing program, engineering analysis and report preparation for roadway soil survey and structures reports. Performed design calculations, pilot hole boring program, determined production shaft lengths and resolved construction issues with shaft installation. Also performed design of pipe pile foundations, set production lengths and performed hammer evaluations for false work as well as Wave Equation Analysis using WEAP computer software. Project consisted of replacement of Bascule Bridge spanning the Clearwater Harbor. Ringling Causeway Bridge (Design Build Project). Project included a new bridge over the Intercoastal waterway with 9 -foot diameter drilled shafts. Chief Geotechnical Engineer responsible for reviewing the subsurface investigation, laboratory -testing program pile, foundation design, engineering analysis, report preparation, and review of drilled shaft inspections. Project included 8 bridge widenings and/or replacements. SR 20 over Chipola River, Calhoun County, Florida: Provided geotechnical engineering and consulting services for a for new bridge over Chipola River. The bridge is on approximately 125 -foot long 60 -inch diameter drilled shafts. Performed soil borings, for the roadway, ponds and bridge structure REFERENCES Mr. Terrence Walters, FDOT D4 & D6 Materials Office, 954.677-7019 Ms. Teresa (Terry) Puckett, District Geotechnical Engineer, FDOT District 1/7 Materials Office863-519-4246 Intertek itryrAli 82 Carlos Duque Project Manager — Geotechnical Services Year started with PSI: 2005 Education Bachelor Degree, Business Administration, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, Colombia, 2003 Certifications/Registrations/Technical Training PSI Project Manager Certification Program, 2007 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Duque has over 10 years of project management experience in the area of geotechnical laboratory testing, soil classification and related construction testing/inspection operations. He has been involved in numerous projects for the public and private sectors including: Miami -County, Various Cities within Miami -Dade County, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) (District IV, VI and Turnpike), Port(s) (Miami and Port Everglades), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), School District(s) (Miami -Dade, Broward, Monroe and Palm Beach) etc. Mr. Duque's experience includes coordination, monitoring and evaluation of subsurface explorations, laboratory studies, construction operations and assistance in geotechnical report preparation. REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE Port of Miami Tunnel (SR A1A), Miami/Miami Beach, Miami -Dade County, Florida Involved in the preparation of numerous Geotechnical Data Reports which contained the results of the field and laboratory tests associated with the geotechnical works both on land and over water. The field work involved obtaining various permits (with DERM, FDEP, USACOE) and coordination with various government agencies, cruise lines and environmental entities. The field work involved the use of methodologies such as Standard Penetration Test (SPT), rock coring (wire line and conventional double/triple tube), permeability/packer testing, Cone Penetrometer Testing, grouting studies, groundwater velocity measurements etc. Due to time restrictions posed by the cruise operations, field work during the last leg of our study required a 24 hour operation over water utilizing two crews. Role: Project Specialist 1 Date: 2003-14 1 PSI Fees: 3+ Million Dollars 1 Client: Mr. Steve Dusseault, P.E., P.G., Resident Engineer, PB America, 617-821-6894. FPL Overtown-Venetian Transmission Line — Miami/Miami-Beach, Miami -Dade County, FL Involved in developing design documents for the construction of transmission line from Miami to Miami Beach across the Biscayne Bay. The installation involved cut and cover techniques on the land side, while horizontal direction drilling (HDD) was utilized to construct the alignment across Biscayne Bay. The use of the HDD technique was vital within Biscayne Bay so as to minimize impacts to the submerged aquatic resources. The field work occurred both on land and over the shallow waters of Biscayne Bay, which required significant coordination with various environmental agencies. Role: Project Specialist 1 Date: 2003-08 1 PSI Fees: $500k+ Client: Mr. Jim Sells, Project Manager, Jacobs, 786-236-5758. City of Opa-Locka City -Wide Water & Wastewater Improvements, Miami -Dade County, FL Due to the age of the existing infrastructure, the distribution and collection piping has experienced a significant number of failures. The city has expressed a need to put in place critical infrastructure components that are adequately and efficiently sized to handle current and projected demand whilst operating in an environmentally sound and sustainable manner. Our involvement related to determining the hydraulic conductivity values (k). to aid in the design and permitting of the proposed stormwater management system and providing recommendations for pipe bedding, groundwater control, and pavement restorations. Role: Project Specialist 1 Date: 2015 1 PSI Fees: $72k+ 1 Client: Ms. Donna Grace P.E., EAC Consulting, Inc., 954-714-2007. Intertek Nas 83 Carlos Duque Project Manager — Geotechnical Services Various Utility Line Construction in Miami -Dade County Force Main Replacement S.W. 192nd Avenue from S.W. 354th Street to S.W. 360th Street (2014) I S.W. 76th Street and S.W. 84th Street (2014) 1 N.W. 112th Avenue from W. Flagler Street to N.W. 2nd Terrace (2015) 1 Pump station and sewer line extension, Diplomat Parkway, Hallandale Beach, Florida (2015) Additional Projects • Numerous FDOT Roadway, Pavement Core and Bridge Widening programs. • Several new and expansions to health care facilities in Miami -Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties (Baptist, Leon, Hendry Regional, etc.). • High Rise— 27 -story Ocean Marine Yacht Club, Hallandale Beach, twin 21 -story Downtown Doral, 24 -story Brickell Ten, Zenith Development, Satori Development, Mid -town 5. • Universities — Miami -Dade College (Wolfson Campus), Florida International University, University of Miami. • Others — Federal Office Building, Miramar, South Miami Cultural Center, RAR for Class V Injection Wells at the Port of Miami Tunnel, Miami Intermodal Center, Miami -Dade Expressway. Intertek Vie® 84 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc, IONAL SOLUTION' 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY Please see Financial Capacity in following pages CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ Na. 2017 -028 -KB 1 VARIOUS GEL SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 86 Order Summary Page 1 of 1 Help Home Dun & Bradstreet Government So itions Contractor Management Portal dun&bradsEreeE 1 Find Your Company Customer Support Privacy Policy Help View Registration Status D&B Supplier Certification Receipt Date Time Company D -U -N -S Product Cost 04- 14:51:28 CALVIN, 044297369 Supplier Sub $91.95 11- GIORDANO & Portal Total 2017 ASSOCIATES Registration INC. Product - Yearly Tax $0,00 Total Cost $91.95 For further information or clarification Please contact our Customer Resource Group by clicking on the Customer Support link at the bottom of the page. Print Back To progress through the portal, use the available navigation buttons, Do not use the back or forward buttons on your browser window Powered by 8:1 87 https://supp l ierportaLdnb.corn/webapp/wcs/stores/servletlS p R.egistrationRceeiptViiew? ian.g.... 4/11/2017 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC„ Page 1 of 8 dun '8?bradstreet To save report(s) to your PC, click here for instructions. Supplier Qualifier Report C9 Print this Report Copyright 2017 Duo & Bradstreet - Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 100150009 ATTN: CALVIN;, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Report Printed: APR 11 2017 In Date B1.1 NFOR CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. 1800 Eller Dr Ste 600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 This is a headquarters location. Branch(es) or division(s) exist, Telephone: 954 926-2600 Chief executive: DENNIS J GIORDANO, CEO Year started: 1987 Employs: D -U -N -S® Number: 04-429-7369 D&B Rating: Number of employees: Composite credit appraisal: D&B Supplier Risk: 1R2 1R is 10 or more employees. 2 is good. 1 SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK (SER) RATING FOR THIS 82 (50 here) FIRM : 1 History: CLEAR Financing: SECURED i}AYt`)EX® D&B PAYbEX: 78 When weighted by dollar amount, payments to suppliers average 3 days beyond terms. t► 100 120 days slow ammiummoi 30 days slow Prompt Antitlipatos Based on up to 24 months of trade, MMARY ANALYSTS D&B Rating: 1R2 Number of employees: 1R indicates 10 or more employees, Composite,credit appraisal: 2 is good. The 1R and 2R ratings categories reflect company size based on the total number of employees for the business. They are assigned to business flies that do not contain a current financial statement. In 1R and 2R Ratings, the 2, 3, or 4 credit worthiness indicator is based on analysis by D&B of public filings, trade payments, business age and other 7 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 High Modium Low https://supplierportal,dnb.conn/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/S(X17.R.eportDisplay?reportFor ma... 4/11/2017 PROBABILITY OF CEASED OPERATIONS/I ECOMING 1NAC"i'IVE D&B Supplier Qualifier Report:. CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 2 of 8 irnportant factors,. 2 is the highest Composite Credit Appraisal a company not supplying D&B with current financial Information can receive. For more information, see the D&B Rating Key, &eIow its an overview of the company's rating history since 01/15/99: D&B Rating 1iR2 1R3 1R2 1R3 1R2 1R3 1R2 Date Applied 07/22/15 08/17/09 04/17/06 10/20/04 08/15/03 01/23/01 01/15/99 The Summary Analysis section reflects information in D&B's file as of April 10, 2017. RISK SCORE ,ANALY SER COMM'E,NTARY: - Higher risk industry based on inactive rate for this Industry. Proportion of past due balances to total amount owing. SUPPLIER EVALUATION RISK RATING: 1 The probability of ceased operations/becoming inactive indicates what percent of U.S. businesses is expected to cease operations or become inactive over next 12 months, Probability of Supplier Ceased Operations/Becoming Inactive Percentage of US business with same SER score Average Probability of Supplier Ceased Operations/Becoming Inactive : CREDIT DELINQUENCY SCORE: ia7VERSITY Minority -Owned Business: Women -Owned Business: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: Small Disadvantaged Business: HUB -Zoned Certified Business: SBA 8(a) Certified: CUSTOMER SERVICE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Labor surplus area: Small Business: 1.3% (130 PER 10,000) 13% (1,300 PER 10,000) 0.48% (48 PER 10,000) - Average of Businesses in D&B's Supplier Database 597 Historically Underutilized Business: Veteran -Owned Business: Vietnam Veteran Business;. Disabled -Owned Business: Historical College Classification:. N/A N/A N/A. N/A N/A YES (2017) N/A If you have questions about this report, please call our Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234..3867 from anywhere within the U.S. If you are outside the U.S. contact your local D&B office. *** Additional Decision Support Available *** https://stlpplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servle.t/SQRR.eportDispla.y?reportforlf.a... 4/11/20 17 D&13 Supplier Qlual:i'f'i.er'Report: CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 3 of 8 Additional D&B products, monitoring services and specialized investigations are available to help you evaluate this company or iits industry. Call Dun & Bradstreet's Customer Resource Center at 1.800.234.3867 from anywhere within the 'U,S., or visii't our website at www.dnb.com. HXSTORY The following information was reported 02/01/2017: Officer(s): DENNIS J GIORDANO, CEO SHELLEY EICHNER, V PRES DIRECTOR(S): THE OFFICER(S) The Florida Secretary of State's business registrations file showed that Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc was registered as a Corporation on June 27, 1985,.under the file registration number M17373, Business started 1987. 100% of capital stock is owned by Dennis Giordano. RECENT EVENTS: On July 31, 2012, sources stated that Calvin, Giordano & Associates Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL, has announced that an affiliatecompany, Calvin, Giordano Coastal Group, LLC has acquired certain assets and key employees of East Bay Group LLC, North Palm Beach, FL, on July 23, 2012. Further details are not available. DENNIS 3 GIORDANO born 1949. 1987 -present active here, SHELLEY EICHNER. Antecedents not available. AFFXLIATES: Thefollowing are related through common principals, management and/or ownership: Berry & Calvin Inc, Hollywood, FL. Started '1979'. DUNS #071303358. Operates as consulting civil engieers. Intercompany relations: None reported by management. OPERATIONS 02/01/2017 Description: Provides engineering services, specializing in civil engineering (100%), Additional phone no: 954 921-7781. ADDITIONAL TELEPHONE NUMBER(S): Facsimile (Fax) 954 921-8807. Tersm are undetermined, Sells to undetermined. Territory : Local. Nonseasonal, Employees: 82 which Includes officer(s). 50 employed here. Facilities: Occupies premises in a building. Branches: Maintains a branch location at 560 Village Blvd, Ste 340, West Palm Beach, FL. IMEMBINEEM This business is at the head of its corporate family tree. It is not a subsidiary of any other business, https://supplierportal.dnb.cam/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SQRReportDispiay7repo> :Forma . 4111./2017 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 4 of 8 UNSPSC (United Nations Standard Product and Services Code) is a globally accepted commodity (Product and Services) classification system, CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC, offers the following product(s) and service (s); 8110:1500 Civil engineering Beginning in 1997, the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) was replaced by the North American Industry Class'ification System (NAICS), This six digit code is a major revision that not only provides for newer Industries, but also reorganizes the categories on a production/process-oriented basis. This new, uniform, industry -wide classification system has been designed as the indexfor statistical reporting of all economic activities of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. 541330 Engineering Services Based on information In our file, D&B has assigned this company an extended 8 -digit SIC. D&B's use of 8 -digit SICs enables us to be more specific to a company's operations than if we use the standard 4 -digit. code. 87110402 Civil engineering P&B PAYDEX The D&B PAYDEX is a unique, dollar weighted experiences as reported to D&B by trade refe 3 -Month D&B PAYDEX: 78 When weighted by dollar amount, payments suppliers average 3 days beyond terms. indicator of payment performance based on up to 58 payment rences. D&B PAYDEX: 78 to When welghted by dollar amount, payments to suppliers average 3 days beyond terms. 12D flays slow JO days slow Prompt Anticipates Based on trade collected over last 3 months. PAYM N SUMMARY 12O days Stow • 30 days siow Prompt Anticipates Based on up to 24 months of trade. When dollar amounts are not considered, then approximately 92% of the company's payments are within terms. The Payment Summary section reflects payment information in D&B's file as of the date of this report.. Below Is an overview of the company's dollar -weighted payments, segmented by its suppliers' primary industries: Top industries; Misc business service Short-trm busn credit Natnl commercial bank Total Total Dollar Largest High Within Rcv"d Amts Credit Terms (#) ($) ($) (a/o) 9 63,700 7 77,550 5 75,000 30,000 20,000 15,000 100 100 100 Days Slow <31 31-60 61-90 90> (o%o) ltttps://supplierportai.tlnb.com/webapp/wes/stores/serelet/SQRReportDi.spla.y?'report of ma... 4/11/2017 D&:$3 Supplier Qualifier Report: CALVIN, GIOR;DANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 5 of '8 Radiotelephone commun 3 18,250 10,000 46 27 27 Misc business credit 3 2,750 1,000 100 - - Misc equipment rental 2 7,500 5,000 67 33 Help supply service 2 2,550 2,500 51 49 Mfg computers 1 15,000 15,000 100 Data processing svcs 1 7,500 7,500 100 - Passenger car rental 1 5,000 5,000 50 50 - OTHER INDUSTRI€S 10 5,750 2,500 78 22 Other payment categories: Cash experiences 13 1,450 500 Payment record unknown 1 100 100 Unfavorable comments 0 0 0 Placed for collections: With D&B 0 0 Other 0 N/A Total in D&B's file 58 282,100 30,000 The highest Now Owes on file Is $30,000 The highest Past Due on file is $500 D&B receives over 600 million payment experiences each year. We enter these new and updated experiences into D&B Reports as this information is received, PAYM IT t9 Detailed payment history Date Reported Paying Record High Credit Now Owes Past Due Selling Terms Last Sale (mm/YY) ($) ($) ($) Within (months) 03/17 Ppt 30,000 30,000 0 1 mo Ppt 25,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 15,000 7,500 0 Ppt 15,000 7,500 0 Ppt 15,000 15,000 0 Ppt 15,000 10,000 0 Ppt 15,000 7,500 0 Ppt 7,500 5,000 0 1 mo Ppt 5,000 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 2,500 , 1,000 0 1 mo Ppt 500 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 500 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 250 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt 100 100 0 • N30 1 mo Ppt 100 0 0 2-3 mos Ppt-Slow 30 5,000 1,000 0 1 mo Ppt-Slow 30 50 50 0 1 mo 02/17 Ppt 20,000 20,000 0 1 mo https.//supplierportal.dnb.corn/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SQR.ReportDisplay7reportFerli1a- 4/11/2017 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 6 of 8 Ppt 15,000 15,000 0 1 mo Ppt 15,000 7,500 0 1 mo Ppt 15,000 15,000 0 1 mo Ppt 15,000 15,000. 0 1 mo Ppt 10,000 10,000 0 1 mo Ppt 7,500 5,000 0 1 mo Ppt 2,500 2,500 0 1 mo Ppt 2,500 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 750 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 500 100 0 6-12 mos Ppt 250 250 0 1 mo Ppt 100 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 50 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt-Slow 30 2,500 750 0 N30 1 mo Ppt-Slow 30 2,500 2,500 500 Regular terms 1 mo Ppt-Slow 60 5,000 2,500 0 1 mo Slow 15-45 10,000 0 0 6-12 mos (036) 100 Cash account 1 mo 01/17 Ppt 1,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 250 0 0 N30 6-12 mos (039) 100 0 0 6-12 mos (040) 100 Cash account 6-12 mos 12/16 Ppt 500 0 0 N30 6-12 mos Ppt 100 100 0 1 mo 10/16 (043) 250 1 mo 4444 44A0Satisfactory. (044) 50 Cash account 1 mo 07/16 (045) 250 Cash account 1 mo 06/16 (046) 100 Cash account 1 mo (047) 50 Cash account 1. mo (048) 0 0 0 Cash account 6-12 mos 05/16 (049) 500 500 Cash account 03/16 (050) 50 Cash.account 1 mo (051) 50 Cash account 1 mo 02/16 (052) 50 Cash account 1 mo (053) 50 Cash account 1 mo 11/15 Ppt 50 0 0 6-12 mos 07/15 Ppt 1,000 0 0 6-12 mos Ppt 1,000 1,000 0 1 mo Ppt 750 750 0 1 mo (058) 100 Cash account 1 mo Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyond terms can be the result of disputes over merchandise, skipped invoices etc. Each experience shown is from a separate supplier, Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported, PAYi!1 SUPPLIER VERSUS INDUSTRY PAYDEX -> PRIOR 4 QTRS CURRENT 12 MONTH TREND https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/vves/stores/servlet/SQR..RepottDisplay?reportForma.... 4/11/2017 D&B Supplier Qualifier Report: CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 7 of 8 JUN SEP DEC MAR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR Supplier 76 77 77 77 78 76 77 76 75 75 75 77 78 78 78 PAYDEX Industry PAYDEX (Based on 14 establishments in SIC 8711) UP QRT 80 80 80 80 80 80 MEDIAN 78 78 78 78 78 78 LO QRT 71 71 71 71 72 72 80 79 72 80 78 73 APR 78 PAYDEX scores are updated daily and are based on upto 13 months of trade experiences from the Dun& Bradstreet trade file. All amounts displayed within this report are in local currency. 02/01/2017 The name and address of this business have been confirmed by D&B using available sources, PJBLIC FILIN S The following Public Filing data is for information purposes only and is not the official record, Certified copies can only be obtained from the official source. UCC FXLINGS Collateral: Type: Sec. party: Debtor: Filing number: Filed with: Date filed: Latest Info Received: Type: Sec. party: Debtor: Filing number: Filed with: Date filed: Latest Info Received: Original UCC filed date: Original filing no.: Collateral: Type: Sec. party: Debtor: Filing number: Assets - Fixtures Original FREEDMAN,GARY M, MIAMI, FL LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE OF THE RENAISSANCE CRUISES, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST, MIAMI, FL CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES 200602023821 SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TALLAHASSEE, FL 03/03/2006 031J4L2006 Amendment FREEDMAN,GARY M, MIAMI, FL LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE OF THE RENAISSANCE CRUISES, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST, MIAMI, FL CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES 200604401971 SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TALLAHASSEE, FL 12/20/2006 01/03/2007 03/03/2006 200602023821 Contract rights Including proceeds and products - General intangibles(s) Including proceeds and products - Chattel paper inciudfng proceeds and products Original SUNTRUST BANK, ATLANTA, GA CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC, 201002083026 https://supplierportal. dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stares/servlet./SQR:1:.eportDisplay?repartForma,. 4/11/2017 D&B .Supp'lie.r!r, ualli:fler Report: CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES INC. Page 8 of 8 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TALLAHASSEE, FL Date filed: 03/01/2010 Latest ;Info Received: _...__ 03/19/2010. Collateral: Type: Type: Sec,. party: Debtor: Filing number: Filed with: Equipment Original ADVANCE ACCEPTANCE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN FIRST WESTERN BANK & TRUST, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN CALVIN, GIODANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. 201300265432 SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TALLAHASSEE, FL Date filed: 11/22/2013 Latest Info Received: 12L06[2013_ Type: Termination Sec. party: ADVANCE ACCEPTANCE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN FIRST WESTERN BANK & TRUST, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN Debtor: CALVIN, GIODANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. Filing number: 201609745300 Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TALLAHASSEE, FL Date filed: 12/20/2016 Latest Info Received: 12/21/2016 Original UCC filed date: 11/22/2013 Original filing no.: 201300265432 There are additional UCC's in D&B's file on this company available by contacting 1-800-234-3867. The public record items contained in this report may have been paid, terminated, vacated or released prior to the date this report was printed. GOVEENT AC V Activity summary Borrower (Dir/Guar): Adrnlnistrative debt: Contractor: Grantee: Party excluded from federal Congressional District: The details provided In the Government government and other sources. program(s): NO NO YES NO NO 25 Activity section are as reported to Dun & Bradstreet by the federal Copyright 2017 Dun & Bradstreet - Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber 100150009 https://supplierportal. dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stor. es/servlet:/SOR eportDisplay?reportForma... 4/ 1.1120 t 7 4. CITY OP MIAMI BEACH 1 RPQ No. 2017 -020 -KB VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED" BASIS 96 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' 3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. is a multi -discipline company with over 380 employees in South Florida. CGA provides a broad range of services including Construction Engineering and Inspection, Surveying, Design, Landscape Architecture and Inspection, Planning, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Transportation Engineering, Environmental Services, Data Technology, and Indoor Air Quality and Emergency Management. Our team is ready to assist the CEI staff and the City on this "as needed" contract. The Calvin Giordano and Associates (CGA) Team provides a remarkable combination of technical capability, regional knowledge, creative and resourceful approaches to complex problems, and a thorough knowledge of SFWMD and FDEP Grant requirements of federal, state and local governing agencies. Our approach to project management is a holistic project approach. These core beliefs, along with our proven approach and plan to critical issues discussed later in this letter are what makes our team the best team for this important project. Our plan and approach are tailored to specific project issues which make our approach the most effective and beneficial to the City. Commitment to Satisfy the City's Needs: Our 380 employees across Florida are ready to help the City on any engineering or construction related tasks on this project. We are 100% committed to the City and the City will be our main priority. 1) Materials Certification: Our team is committed to providing the City with the final materials certification on each as needed project before the final acceptance day. 2) Monthly & Final Estimates: Our veteran PA's and CSS's will ensure that the monthly estimate is submitted on time along with all the required certifications. To achieve this goal, the Senior Inspectors and the contractor will agree on quantities on weekly basis. Our team is committed to submitting the FE Box in less than 10 days from FA to expedite the release of final payments. 3) Cost and Time Goals: Our team is aware of the City's time and cost goals. The CGA team along with our sub have a proven track record of completing projects on time and on budget. We extend our time and cost commitment to you on this project. We will complete your as needed projects under budget and under time for the City of Miami Beach, 4)Meeting Minutes: Our SPE and PA are committed CITY OF MIAMI BRACH' to providing progress meeting minutes within 24 hours, the Pre -con meeting minutes within '48 hours and the pre -activity meeting minutes within 48 hours to expedite the communication and documentation of the discussions conducted during the meetings. Final Estimates Support: Our team is exceptionally well prepared to manage the monthly contractor invoicing, agency reimbursement and final project closeout for the City of Miami Beach. We have extensive experience in Final Estimate/ Grant procedures and our staff are Final Estimates 1 & 2 certified by CTQP. Our proposed PA staff have extensive final estimate, material certification, warranty, and audit experiences and will lead this effort for our team. More specifically, the final package areas of focus include but are not limited to: Contract Time folder, Engineer's weekly summary/Daily report of construction, Material Certification package - Sr. PE's Certificate Statement, Pay Reduction Summary and Notification of failing test result reports, QC Plan and signed and sealed as -built plans submitted by the Contractor. Survey Control: Our Survey Department will be available to perform any survey work as needed by the City. Our team is prepared to check or establish the survey control baseline along with sufficient baseline control points and bench marks at appropriate intervals along the project. Other Support Services- If Needed: CGA is prepared to provide services as needed in the following areas, Environmental Support Services, utility installation inspection and testing, Geotechnical Support, Paint Inspection, and Hazardous Materials Handling. The proposed CGA team will address any other related construction management duties either internally or through the addition of qualified vendors to meet the needs of the project. In pursuit of this contract and support of your needs, we have formulated a team to cover the "as needed" scope of services as identified in your advertisement. At any time during the life of our contract if the City has a need for a specific person, firm or expertise we are committed to provide that person, firm or expertise as a sub -consultant or direct hire. Quality Assurance & Quality Control: Within 14 days of award, Bob McSweeney, PE will provide the City with the project's QA plan. The plan will include a description of' the company's QA organization, the RPQ No. 2017 -029 -KB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 97 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIOVA1. SZ Ll TIONS' method and frequency of QA reviews, the types of QA records that will be generated during construction, & control of sub -consultants. The QA Plan will be certified by an officer of the firm. Mr. Mabrouk will conduct a thorough and detailed pre -services meeting with the Construction PM to review the expectations and incorporate comments on the QA plan if needed, Our team includes a veteran Bob McSweeney PE, who has over 26 years of experience in the field of roadway and bridge construction. Bob will conduct a QA review within the first six weeks of construction that will include a thorough review of the project's documentation, final estimates files and filing system to ensure that the project is kicked off on the right foot. Bob will conduct periodic reviews thereafter on Final Estimates and Earthwork as well as other major work items. We understand that asphalt is one of the major ticket items on almost all CEI project's, Therefore, our team will perform an initial QA review on our asphalt inspection staff after the Contractor has completed 25% of the asphalt pay item amount to validate that all sampling, testing, inspection, and documentation are occurring as required in the contract. CGA will incorporate our Quality Assurance Checklist with the current Final Estimate Submittal checklist including: • Performs thorough review and oversight of the QC density log book by verification personnel to minimize errors and potential delay to the final material certification • Perform bi-weekly reviews of material testing results to ensure resolution of open samples, failing test results and missing QC and/or verification information. • Generate and submit an accurate and timely Final Offer Letter within 30 days of Final Acceptance, • Maintain current and accurate records of field changes and plan revisions for the preparation of the as -built plans. • Ensure that Maintenance of Traffic Plans are in accordance with the MUTCD and that one lane of through traffic is maintained throughout the whole project limits. • Continue to keep the residents, hospital, school and businesses in the immediate area apprised of all construction phasing throughout project duration. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH APPROACH TO STAFFING, AVAILABILITY AND LOCALE Qualifications & Certifications of Staff: CGA is committed to providing the most qualified staff to ensure the successful completion of this project, Mr. Mabrouk is a firm believer in education and training, therefore our staff maintains CTQP certifications up to date at all times. Our proposed team on this specific contract have all the required CTQP certifications to perform the required inspection and administration work as needed. We are aware of some of the issues that occurred Onprojects across the state regarding the expiration of certifications for inspectors on active projects. To avoid that, CGA will use our internal certification verification process that uses specialized spreadsheets to diligently verify that our staff members proposed on this project maintain the qualifications required for their respective position. We are committed to providing our proposed team with the knowledge required to provide the optimal level of service to the City. Our entire team is crossed trained and has experience performing the required inspections on all roadway construction activities. Our proposed inspectors have experience working as PA's and CSS's on other roadway projects. This experience will expedite decision making on the field and will ensure the quality of our final estimates process. Proposed Staffing Availability and Location: CGA guarantees that all our proposed staff is 100% available for the entire duration of your "as needed" contract. Our team will report to our Miami office which will be used as the field office for your contract. This will save both the CEI and the City any extra costs associated with leasing and operating a special office for this project. The office is located at 10800 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 950, Miami, FL 33161. The field office will be accessible to the CEI staff, the City's staff and the contractor for biweekly meetings. Our SPE and construction staff will attend all meetings in person. Our staff is available and will always be in attendance to conduct the Pre -Construction Meeting, bi-weekly progress meetings, pre -activity meetings, and coordination meetings. Our proposed team of experienced CGA staff and sub - consultant was assembled with a conscious effort to provide the City with the qualified personnel required to successfully complete any of your "as needed" contracts. Every staff member will be approved by City's Project Manager prior to starting the work on 98 RN No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CEJ SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED' BASIS Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. E X C E. P F I O N A E SOLUTIONS" this project. As a cost saving measure, our Project Administrator can perform all CSS duties on your contract. We will also use multiple staff members on part time basis to save the City costs while providing them with the optimal and most effective level of service needed to successfully completing any projects requested. CGA realizes that the proposed staffing levels may need to be adjusted as the job progresses. By using our cross -trained staff, we have the ability to manage your jobs effectively while keeping our staff prepared to downsize or increase based on the City's directions. Approach With the City: Project Communication Plan Developed by Staff: Prior to breaking ground, The SPE and the project team will conduct a meeting with the City's project manager to review the contract requirements, the approach to critical issues," the major milestones and the expectations from the CEI. Our team will be focused on keeping the City's project manager involved in major issues, especially any related to cost, time, safety, PIO and grant requirements. Our team will provide the City's Project Manager with a weekly update report that includes the major issues and activities of the week: We will be conducting a bi-weekly meeting with the City's PM to review the project progress. We will also provide the City's Project Manager with monthly logs that lists the PIO complaints, NOI's and Change Orders. The PM will also receive the monthly progress report for the project on the 1st of every month. The project team will conduct a thorough site inspection to catalogue the existing field conditions, videotape and photograph the project for their records. A kick off meeting is set up between the City's selected Project Manager, CGA's Staff and the Contractor's Project Manager. This is to take place before the Pre - Construction Meeting. At this meeting the Contractor is provided with hard and electronic copies of all documentation that must be complete and returned to the Project team at the Pre -Construction Conference. We will cover the Construction requirements (shop drawings, quality control), the City requirements, as well as the County, SFWMD, FDEP and FDOT permit/ grant requirements during this initial face to face with the selected contractor to ensure he has the material required to complete his operations. We will also identify items which are not included in the original scope of work, assessing `third party' expectations/ requirements or alerting the contractor to long lead items, such root pruning of trees to be relocated. Typically, these actions reduce any cost or time impacts CITY OE MIAMI $EACH to the project. After the notice to proceed, kick-off meetings with the City, regulatory agencies, Contractor and sub- contractors will be scheduled. The agenda for our weekly or bi-weekly progress meetings will include a two week look -ahead schedule "report compared to the current project status, overall project status, schedule updates and any other relevant information for timely completion of the project. At these team meetings, goals will be clarified, commitments will be solidified, understanding and synergy will be realized to guide the team's focus and keep the project on schedule and within budget. In this manner, the work can be processed in a timely fashion that allows for adjustments to be made before a schedule problem occurs. We have a history of excellence in project planning and execution. We have found that the fundamental requirement for successful management of projects such as this is the assignment of key personnel with the necessary skills and experience. The professional qualifications of our team will ensure superior and innovative products and services for the City of Miami Beach on this project. Partnering with the Contractor: We constantly look aheadof the Contractor and discuss issues up front so there are no surprises. The Contractor must knowtheir contract and our goal as your Construction Management professional is to ensure they abide by the requirements of the contract - we do this as a partner, highlighting needed submittals and timelines as detailed in our response. As a standard practice we will use the system included in the City's contract with the Contractor to standardize our assessment of the contractor's performance. We will use this tool to ensure that the contractor understands the importance of MOT, Safe Routes to Schools, Environmental Compliance and the significance of timely document submittal. Our staff of CEI professionals are committed to these goals. We will enlist the City's expertise in regards to specific City policies to minimize resolution timeframes. We will also work with City staff to ensure that all required City permits are procured by the Contractor prior to beginning work and the Contractor's signed and sealed MOT plan is approvedby the City Traffic Engineer. RFQ No. 2017.028 -KB 1 VARIOUS CE[ SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED" .BASIS 99 Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc. S O L CI t I O N S' The City will also be responsible for the review and approval of our time and invoices for CEI payments. Project Reporting Methods- CEI Management Process: Submittals: • RFI's: All RFI's will be reviewed and responded to by the CEI team. The team has the construction experience and the technical support to address most RFI's. All RFI's will be documented in the RFI log which will be submitted to the City representative on monthly basis. • Shop drawings: A shop drawings schedule will be required for submittal by the Contractor during the Pre -Con. All shop drawings will be reviewed by our team for comments. • As Builts: The project team will update the plans during the life of the project as changes occur. The SPE will sign and seal the final as -built plans when the project is completed. • Contract Changes/Supplemental Agreements: Our team is experienced with change orders and developing Supplemental Agreements, Changes in the field will be negotiated with the contractor for a fair price and a Work Order or SA will be developed quickly to compensate the contractor and avoid delays. Our goal is always to keep the job moving! • Progress/Schedule: The baseline schedule will be reviewed by our SPE. The SPE will review the schedule logic, milestones, start and end dates of activities, time allocated materials curing (Ex. Asphalt) time allocated for utility related work, activity duration and the CPM path. The team will request progress updates if the contractor's progress falls behind his baseline schedule. MOT: The MOT plan will be submitted prior to construction for review by the CEI. The Contractor will also be required to submit his traffic safety supervisor's certifications and a weekly MOT report. On a monthly basis the Contractor will be required to submit his MOT Certification of Quantities. Schedule and Costs: Our team is committed to completing the project within time and .below budget. The team CGA have put together has a long proven track of meeting our time and money goals on construction projects. • Progress Photos: Progress photos will be provided on monthly basis to the City representative. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH • Monthly and Final Estimates: Our proposed PA has extensive experience with processing monthly and final estimates. Our proposed SPE has managed multiple grant projects and will ensure that all grant requirements are adhered to. There will be no delays to the Contractor's payment or reimbursement of funds to the City on this project. • Claims documentation: The team will work diligently to avoid any delays and resolve claim related issues in a timely manner to minimize all impacts to the City. NOI's will be tracked using a specialized log and it will be provided to the City's project manager on monthly basis. • Weather Letters and other project records (SWPPP/NPDES) will be submitted in a timely manner. Meeting Minutes: • Pre -Construction Conference: the meeting will be facilitated and conducted by the CGA team. The meeting will be held in advance of construction and will include the Contractor, the sub -contractors, the City representatives, the County's representatives, utility owners, as well as other stake holders. Major project issues, schedule and milestones as well as other project related topics will be discussed in detail with the Contractor during this meeting. Meeting minutes will be sent to all parties within 24 hours after the meeting.. • Progress Meetings: The team will hold a weekly or bi-weekly progress meeting with the Contractor to discuss the progress of the job, the project issues and the project schedule. Meeting minutes will be provided to all parties within 24 hours of the meeting. • Pre -Activity Meetings: The project team will hold various pre -activity meetings prior to some of the most critical construction activities on this project. The team will hold pre -signal office meeting, pre - signal field meeting, pre -paving meeting, pre -drill shaft meeting, pre -concrete meeting, pre -ADA meeting and a pre-signing/pavement markings meeting. Major requirements, specific plans issues, expectations and testing requirements will be discussed in detail during those meetings. • Monthly Update Meetings: The SPE will hold a one-on-one monthly meeting with the City representative to discuss the job progress. Staff's Developed Approach to Technical Services: RFQ No. 2017 -025 -KB [VARIOUS CEI SERVICES. ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 100 Galvin, Giordano Associates, Inc. ir.xxCEFriSOLUTION ; • Daily Inspections: Our experienced staff will be responsible for the daily inspection on the job and the detailed recording of all construction activities. • Material Requirements 1. Quality Control Plan (Earthwork/Asphalt): The Contractor will be responsible for submitting a detailed QC plan that includes materials type, materials source, supplier info, QC staff qualifications as well as a detailed plan of how he is planning to perform the work. Our experienced PA and SPE will perform a detailed review of the QC plan and provide comments then accept if no issues are found. 2. Review nursery selected species for contract compliance: The team will ensure that nursery selected species are reviewed. Ms. Erin Sudma'n is an experienced landscape inspector who will perform detailed inspections to ensure substantial compliance with the plans. Review QC Sampling and Testing: The project team will be responsible for reviewing the QC sampling and testing methods for compliance with the standard specifications and contract requirements. Deficiencies will be reported immediately to the Contractor and the PA to ensure that corrections are implemented in a timely manner. 1. Perform Verification Sampling/Testing on as needed basis only: Our experienced inspectors are all CTQP certified in Asphalt level 1 and 2, earthwork. level 1 and 2, concrete, drilled shaft, advanced MOT, and IMSA as well as many other certifications. The inspection team will be conducting VT testing as needed using the methodology stipulated in the FDOT Standard Specifications, plans, & FDOT Materials Manual. 1. Verify Producer Certifications: Our inspection staff will ensure that all producer certifications are submitted and reviewed. • Our inspection staff, PA and SPE will also perform the following, 1. Monitor Maintenance of Traffic during construction to ensure compliance with the contract and plans' requirements. 2. Ensure adequate ADA compliant pedestrian access is provided throughout construction and that bus routes are maintained. The team will coordinate with Miami -Dade Transit throughout construction. 3. Ensure driveway access is maintained throughout CITY OFMIAMI BEACH construction. Driveway work directly impacting a business or a resident will be coordinated with the private property owner two weeks in advance of construction. All access management changes will be coordinated with the business owners in advance of construction. 4. Verify environmental permit compliance if needed. 5. Document item quantities installed for monthly payment using specialized logs. All quantities will be reviewed prior to processing the monthly pay application. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES Our CEI team will also perform the following duties: • Communication/Coordination with Project Stakeholders 1. FDOT permits(Construction, Public Information and Maintenance) 2. PBCT (Lane Closures/Impacts to Bus Schedule) 3. SFWMD and FDEP (Grant Manager) 4. Residents/Businesses (Project Schedule/Access/ Potential Impacts) 5. Local Police/Emergency (MOT/Lane Closures/ Potential Impacts) • Request for Information/Shop Drawing Process • Document Control • Issue/Conflict Resolution • Permit Coordination/Close Out Documentation • Review of Final Record Plans • Ensure that 100% of all required sampling and testing is performed in accordance with the specifications. • Perform 100% of all EEO and contract compliance functions, • Establish early communication, and maintain coordination with all stakeholders. Establish an action plan to identify appropriate contacts and quickly resolve issues as encountered. • Perform timely inspection of all components and provide accurate, daily quantities of materials and work performed. • Closely monitor the Contractor's operations and minimize impacts to the traveling public. RFQ No. 2017.020 -KB [VARIOUS CR[ SERV[CES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASS 101 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL so L W 7 r o W s-. PROJECT CRITICAL ISSUES AND TECHNICAL APPROACH Grant Administration and Funds Reimbursement The CGA team understands the importance of following the grant requirements to ensure an expedited reimbursement to the City of Miami Beach if any of these as needed projects require it. Our experienced CEI team will ensure an expedited reimbursement by providing the following to the grant managers: Monthlyprogress update reflectingthe construction progress including a narrative of the major construction activities, the anticipated activities for the upcoming month, list of contract changes, cost status update, time status update, and pictures documenting the construction progress. • Monthly Pay Applications including the applicable backup documents, Contractor's invoice, subcontractor's invoices, the CEI quantity tracking worksheet, and the City's cancelled check. • Monthly Weather Letters and biweekly progress meeting minutes. • A letter documenting the final materials acceptance and the backup certifications, • A copy of the final signed and sealed as -built plans and final inspection reports. • A list of all the Change Orders along with the applicable authorized Work Order as a backup, • A letter signed by the City accepting the project. The letter must include the final construction cost and the final acceptance date. • A letter with a statement from the CEI Senior Project Engineer indicating the project was constructed in accordance with the design plans and the applicable codes. Proactive CGA Detailed Approach: Inspection of Watermain - if required: • Our team will inspect the Contractor's work daily to confirm that the configuration indicated on design is followed. • During the installation of water main pipes, the Contractor must always comply with the minimum separation from other utilities as indicated on plans. Our Senior Inspector will watch for those separations vigilantly to confirm that the required separation has been achieved. • If ductile iron (DI) valves and other fittings are required, it is important to confirm that they are DL Non ductile iron parts look very similar to -CITY OE MIAMI BEACH ductile iron parts. Usually the part has the letters DI casted on it or comes with a tag that indicates if it is DI or not. • Confirm that the pipes are being installed at the minimum required depth as shown in the plans. • Confirm that the Contractor is installing the underground tape or ,wire to locate the pipe as required in the plans and contract. • When doing tapping sleeve connections, a short 15 minute pressure test is done after the sleeve has being installed and before doing the tap. This is to confirm that the sleeve has been installed properly. Our senior inspector will monitor the test and document it as it occurs. Once the tap is completed, the valve should opened for a few seconds to flush away any particulate from the core process. • It is a good practice to confirm that when connections between two main pipes are done, there is no caving underneath the tee, cross or tapping sleeve. The material underneath the connection part should be compacted or brick, may be placed underneath to provide support. NoN- supported connections may become a problem when pressures come into play. • The as -built drawings of the water system shall be requested from the Contractor for review. This step is required for the Contactor to eventually proceed with the bacteriological testing and Health Department approval. Testing • The pressure test is the main test performed in the field to the system after the installation of the pipes and before putting the pipe in service. Even when it is not a requirement to do this test before doing the restoration of the trench, the Contractor prefers to perform the test before restoration just in case they have to excavate to fix any problem. Usually the test has a duration of 2 hours during which the segment of water main shall hold the minimum established pressure (or in case the pressure drops, it has to be within the allowable limits). The minimum required pressure for the test varies according to the utility owner. • When the test is completed, it is important to open the fire hydrant or water service farthest from the gauge to check that the pressure drops accordingly and confirm that in fact the whole segment was tested. Also, some water services in between may be blown to confirm that there are no obstructions. • After the pressure test is completed the Contractor can proceed to add chloride to the lines in order to take care of bacteria. Usually, after two or three REQ No. 201.7 -028 -KB [ VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED' BASIS 102 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL S( t U; t D N S days with the water running from the sample points, it can be sampled by the laboratory hired by the Contractor, By this time, as -built plans should have been submitted, reviewed and approved. • After the bacteriologic tests come back as negative, records of the pressure tests, bacteriologic tests and as built drawings are presented to the Health Department. Once the Health Department approves the request, then the Contractor can connect water services to the new system. Paving and Earthwork: Proactive CGA Detailed Approach: We proposed a team that consists of Professional Engineers with extensive roadway paving and reconstruction experience to ensure that the paving operation will run as smoothly as possible. The team proposed by CGA is certified and has extensive experience with milling, resurfacing, roadway reconstruction, earthwork testing and pavement markings. The team will hold a Pre -Paving Meeting with the Contractor to review the specifications and plans requirements to ensure substantial compliance with the contract documents. The team will review the asphalt QC plan prior to paving and will provide comments to the Contractor. Our veteran inspection staff is CTQP Asphalt level 1 and 2 certified and will ensure that temperature testing is performed, the asphalt tickets are collected for review and milling depth is checked. The inspectors will check the cleanness of the milled surface prior to tack application, track asphalt yield rates, and track tack application rates. The overbuild course could result in overruns if not inspected and tracked properly. The team will also perform cross slope checks and a rolling straight edge on the asphalt surface to, ensure compliance with the requirements. Any noted deficiencies will be corrected. All VT tests will be sampled and tested by the CEI team to ensure compliance with the City and FDOT big 4 specification requirements. CGA will ensure that the Contractor uses the track -less tack as required in the latest specification edition. CGA understands the Department's latest challenges with "tack balls", raveling and the use of non -electronic paving machines. To ensure compliance, either the SPE or the PA will be present on the field during the paving operation to identify issues early & implement corrective measures. The Contractor's paving machines will be checked daily and the CPPR process, or the process stipulated in the City's contract with the Contractor, will be followed if the equipment doesn't meet the standard specifications requirements. CITY Or MIAMI BEACH The team will ensure that the QC logs are submitted within 48 hours of the paving operation. The team will also track all asphalt quantities using specialized spreadsheets, especially thickened asphalt sections. Asphalt tracking on side streets will not be permitted! Our inspectors are also Earthwork Level 1 and 2 certified and will ensure that all earthwork related testing is performed as per the FDOT requirements and the earthwork log is completed, inspected and reviewed. Our inspectors will observe the rolling and compaction operations to ensure compliance with the FDOT Standard Index and the contract requirements. Vibratory rollers and hand compactors will not be allowed at areas near the historical sites designated in the contract. The PA and the SPE will perform periodic checks to the earthwork book or forms and a final check to ensure compliance with the FDOT standards. CGA will use expert sub -consultants with Universal Engineering to perform verification testing as needed. Drainage Improvements: Our team will conduct a pre -activity meeting prior to construction to discuss the Contractor's approach and the requirements set forth in the contract plans. Timely submittal& review of shop drawings will be critical expedite the material procurement process and help expedite construction, The CGA inspection team will ensure that all filter fabric, bricks, mortar & coarse aggregate is certified & sampled prior to the installation of any drainage structures to avoid any rework. Adherence to the elevations provided in the plans for the swale areas and the final roadway surface are essential to ensure proper drainage. The inspection staff will verify the provided elevations and ensure that the swales are constructed as per plans. CGA understands the issues the industry has encountered with the proper stamping and certification of drainage structures prior to submittals. Therefore, the inspection staff will ensure that no structure is installed without the submittal of the delivery ticket and the proper certification. The inspectors will also ensure that the structure is stamped by the manufacturer & they will create a database with pictures showing the stamp for each structure for records. Signing & Pavement Markings: Conducting pre -activity meetings prior to the installation of any signs or pavement markings will help prevent errors or surprises during the final stretch of the job when delays can have a more significant impact. REQ No. 201.7 -028 -KB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 103 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIOVAL SOLUTION S" Materials certifications will be submitted prior to the installation of the final pavement markings. All materials certifications will be reviewed by the PA and comments will be provided to ensure compliance with the contract documents. The 2nd lift of markings won't be applied until 14 days after placement of asphalt. A Pre -Sign Installation Meeting will be conducted prior to construction. The SPE and the PA will review the contract plans with the Contractor. The Sr. Inspector will conduct a thorough, detailed review of the signing and pavement markings plans prior to construction and provide comments. The inspection staff will perform a sign panel inspection prior to installation to ensure conformity of the contract requirements regarding reflectivity, air bubbles and the message stated on the sign. Utility owners will be contacted a week in advance so they can refresh their marks to avoid conflicts with sign installation. All certifications will be provided to the maintaining agency at the end of the project. Our Project Administrator will perform a field review prior to construction and create a complete list of all the signs that fall within our project limits and document their condition. Some of those signs don't meet the reflectivity requirements, the County's sign post requirements, the height requirements or simply have faded messages. We will review the list of signs with the City and the EOR to determine if they would like to replace some of the most critical ones during construction. MOT & Safety: In our experience, drop offs during construction may become an issue especially during the widening construction. Implementing daily MOT inspections by our experienced Sr. Inspector will help the Contractor with Index 600 compliance and will prevent drop off issues. MOT will be a major focus and point of emphasize to our team and the Contractor. Ensuring that the MOT plan are implemented and adhered to is essential to the success of any of our projects. Our team is experienced with Standard Index 600 and MOT inspection. The SPE will review the MOT phase two weeks in advance of implementation and will provide comments and suggestions as needed. Changes to the MOT plan will not be allowed without proper review and approval of the Contractor's proposed changes, A copy of the MOT plan will be on site at all time. Our inspectors will ensure the inspection of the MOT on daily basis and will ensure that deficiencies are recorded and addressed CITY OF MIAMI BEACH immediately. Drop offs will be protected as per the FDOT Design Standard Index 600. Staging of equipment and materials within the clear zone will not be permitted. The OSHA safety requirements for open trenches will be strictly adhered to ensure the safety of the contractor's workers, the inspection staff and the general public. All potholes will be repaired immediately using cold patch. PCMS's will be installed two weeks in advance of any construction work. All access to side streets will be maintained either directly or via detours while constructing the pedestrian pavers. Our main focus will be providing a MOT that facilitate traffic movement in a safe manner during construction. We will ensure that pedestrian access is provided at all times. The three phases outlined in the plans will be strictly followed. Any changes proposed by the Contractor must be submitted to the SPE and the City for review and consideration at least 2 weeks in advance. We will ensure that the Contractor submits a notice to the City 30 days in advance of construction. The City and the County will be notified of any lane closures or MOT phase changes at least 2 weeks in advance, The Two Week Look Ahead will be submitted weekly and reviewed by the PA. All lane closures will be provided to all stakeholders on weekly basis. Finally our SPE and PA will review the Contractor's lighting plan for the construction proposed at night. Critical challenge on any CEI project is ensuring that construction activities don't impact pedestrian access which is critical to the success of any project. Our team will conduct a MOT workshop with the Contractor prior to submitting any MOT plans. We will ensure that the MOT plans reflect working on one side of the roadway at a time to ensure that pedestrian access and bike access (especially to and from the school areas when in vacinity of improvements) are maintained at all times. Sidewalk closed signs will be used at legal and safe pedestrian crossing locations throughout the project. PIO & Coordination: On any CEI project, extensive coordination and PIO efforts are required prior and during construction. The RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN ".AS -NEEDED" BASIS 104 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' residents must be informed of advance of construction impacting their driveways or work that will directly impact their landscape at least 2 weeks in advance. CGA is prepared to provide door hangers during the initial weeks of the project detailing the CEI contract information and schedule. Our intent is to visit each impacted resident or business owner to ensure they are aware of the proposed improvements, our schedule and potential impacts. We will reach out to the school that falls within our project limits to notify them of our lane closures at least 2 weeks in advance. Our experiences have proven that an informed and knowledgeable community reduces the number of complaints that each Local Agency will receive - our staff will work as an extension of the City to ensure that all issues are addressed timely with documentable solutions. We will make sure that all driveway owners are notified two weeks in advance of any work impacting their driveways. The mailboxes will be relocated as per plans and the specifications to allow for continuous delivery of the mail. The team will perform a door to door notification in advance of construction. We will discuss the mail drop off, bulk trash and garbage pickup schedule with the Contractor during the Pre -Construction Meeting. Our team will ensure that we coordinate with all homeowners within the project limits 2 weeks in advance to relocate the mailboxes and the large garbage containers outside the impacted work area. The Contractor's staff will be required to ensure access to the mailboxes and garbage containers during construction so routine services are never interrupted. Maintaining driveway access at all times to the residential houses along the project limits is a main focus to avoid PIO issues during construction. Our team will document the existing conditions and the type of materials used to construct each of the existing driveways prior to construction. The Contractor will be required to salvage the decorative pavers and store them at the staging site so he can reuse them to complete constructing each of the driveways. For driveways with special paint/colored concrete, the Contractor will provide the resident and the City with a color chart for the concrete to paint to be used during construction. The Contractor won't be allowed to begin construction unless the colors used are approved by the City and the Resident directly impacted. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH The Contractor may need to be granted permission to perform harmonization work at the resident's end of the driveway to decrease the driveway slope and avoid damaging vehicles with low bumpers. We will coordinate this work with the impacted driveway owners at least 30 days in advance. Utility Coordination: Our team has extensive experience with utility work on construction projects and our approach to communicating and coordinating utility work is proven. We will begin by reviewing the utility work schedule to create a map of all the utility work that is required on this project. Our Utility Coordinator will contact all utility owners to invite them to the Pre -Construction Meeting and to obtain a status update on the utility work especially work required to be completed during construction. During the Pre -Construction Meeting, our team will further discuss the utility work and schedule a separate utility coordination meeting to develop a specific timeline of all the utility work that is required in the plans or by the construction activities. Two weeks prior to performing any work that may impact an existing utility, our SPE will contact the utility owner and notify them of the upcoming construction. CGA has a Construction Department that specializes in utility work and will support our CEI team at no additional charge to the City if needed. Environmental Requirements: We will ensure that all construction activities are restricted to the limits shown in the plans to eliminate impacts to businesses. Silt fence will be installed prior to staging or construction and it will be inspected for conformity with the Standard Index and the details provided on the plans. The Sr. Inspector will ensure that the grates are wrapped in filter fabric and that all curb/ gutter and curb inlet sediment barriers are installed as per the Standard Index. All existing trees shown to remain will be protected and inspected by our experienced landscape architect. CGA has a stand- alone environmental department that will support our CEI team as needed. The SPE will review the selected staging area to ensure conformity with the contract requirements. Usage of private properties will not be allowed without a written agreement between the Contractor RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 105 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. E X C PTI O N A L SOUTIONS" and the private property owner. The staging area will be coordinated, reviewed and approved by the SPE, the CGA Environmental Specialist and- the City prior to staging any equipment or materials. The SPE will review all permit requirements and will share those requirements with the Contractor to ensure compliance. Control of Project Cost & Schedule: CGA's goal on the project is complete construction within the allowable contract time with 0% time overruns. CGA's approach to achieve this goal and control the project schedule will begin prior to construction. 1) Baseline Schedule: The SPE will conduct a thorough and detailed review of the project's baseline schedule in Primavera to check the CPM and the constructability logic of the schedule. This is the most critical schedule control activity as once the baseline schedule is approved, all delays or sequence changes will be measured against it. The SPE will review the schedule to check that milestones are defined, important dates are accurate, phasing are consistent with the plans, relationships between construction activities are logical, material curing durations are accounted for, shop drawings submittal/review durations are logical, adequate time is allocated for maintenance inspections and construction activities don't conflict with each other. Schedule comments will be provided to the Contractor within 7 days of submittal. The two week look ahead will be submitted every week and the construction schedule will be a main topic of discussion during the Pre -Construction Meeting, the weekly progress meetings, and bi-weekly meeting with the City's PM. 2) Monthly Schedule Updates: The SPE will review all monthly schedule updates in Primavera and compare the updates to the Contractor's progress. If the project is falling behind, the SPE will conduct a schedule impact analysis to determine the delay cause. He will immediately notify the Contractor in writing of the situation and conduct a meeting with him to discuss methods to bring the schedule back on track. 3) Timely Resolutions of Issues: All NOI's or construction issues will be addressed immediately. The SPE and the PA are known for their tenacious work to resolve construction issues expeditiously. NOl's will be responded to timely and in writing after a detailed claim analysis. The NOI's will be tracked using the NOI log that will be presented to all parties during the progress meetings and emailed to them on the 1st of every month. NOI's will be discussed during progress meeting until resolved. If issues escalate to a DRB, our tested and proved project team will be prepared CITY OF MIAMI BEACH to defend the City's position with the support of our company's resources. 4) Weather: Weather will be a critical component to monitor in order to control the project schedule. Many of the major construction activities on this project (i.e. widening) can be effected by rain for many days. Therefore, it is important to take advantage of times outside the rainy season to maximize the production of those activities. 5) Contractor's Adequate Efforts and Continuous Commitment: The CGA team will monitor the Contractor's production rates and ensure that he is using the adequate forces to complete the project on time as scheduled. The inspection team will document production related comments in the daily work reports and any slippage in the production rates will be discussed with the Contractor immediately. Value Added: The CGA team will provide the City with the following added value commitments, 1) SkySite: CGA believes in innovation as a proven way to improve our services to the City. As a result, we have purchased a new software called SkySite to expedite communication between the field staff and the project manager. The software allows inspectors to send RFI's using with the relevant plans drawing using an interactive PDF file, The program also allows our PA's and Inspectors to create lists and logs (ex. RFI and Deficiency Lists) in seconds that links each line in the log to an interactive plans sheet. 2) Company Support: CGA has over 380 employees in all different aspects of engineering. Our team works from 6 different offices throughout the state and is prepared to support our CEI team to ensure the success of this project. 3) Staff's Proximity: Many of our proposed team members live within a close proximity to the City of Miami Beach. This will expedite response to emergency situations during construction. CGA along with our sub -consultants have main offices within 20 minutes of the project location. All staff members will report to the CGA Miami Office while working on this project. 4) DRB: If issues escalate to a DRB level, our tested and proved project team will be prepared to defend the Department position. Our proposed SPE Mr. Mabrouk has been directly involved in 5 DRB's where he presented the client's position. His success ratio is a 4:1. Our team will keep the City informed - we will provide up-to-date project status and schedule information to RFQ No. 2017 -02B -KB 1 VARIOUS CBI SERVICES ON AN `AS -NEEDED" BASIS 106 Calvin, Giordano g Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL S O L G 1 I Cl Vt s" * the City and relevant project stakeholders, as well as to the traveling public, residents, businesses, emergency services, Miami -Dade Transit and government entities that will be directly affected by construction operations. We are confident that these clearly defined goals with CGA leadership will ensure that the project is completed with minimal rework and City intervention, thus saving time and eliminating additional cost impacts to the City of Miami Beach. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS MI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 107 Calvin, Giordano & Associates,.. Inc. E C E P T I 0 W A C S O 1. CI T! 0 y S" CITY Or MIAMI BEACH REQ No. 2017 -028 -KB { VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 108 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL S ci t U T I Li V S'" CALVI.2 OP ID: AY A CCHZL +4....-- CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DDIYYYY) 01/05/2017 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Brown & Brown of Florida, Inc. 1201 W Cypress Creek Rd # 130 P.O. Box 5727 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33310.5727 Eric Martin Woodling CONTACT NAME: (A/C, No. Ext):954-776-2222 FAX No): 954.7764446 E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC N INSURER A: Nat'l Fire Ins Co of Hartford 20478 INSURED Calvin, Giordano & Assoc, Inc. Attn: Dennis Giordano 1800 Eller Drive #600 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316 INSURER a:Transportation Insurance Co. 20494 INSURER C: Valley Forge Ins. Co. 20508 INSURER D: Continental Insurance Co. 35289 INSURER E: Landmark American Ins, Co. 33138 INSURER.F : CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED. NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR HND. POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MMIDD/YYYY) POLICY EXP NM/DO/TM) LIMBS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GL6045487663 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 pREMISES EaE ante) $ 100,000 CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR MED EXP (My one person) $ 15,000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GE 'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY X jE , 1 11.0c OTHER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 Emp Ben. $ 1,000,000 B AUTOMOBILE X LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS _ SCHEDULED AUTOS NON,OWNED AUTOS BUA6043661816 - 01/01/2017.01/01/2018 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE - (Per accident) $ $ D X UMBRELLA LAB EXCESSLIAB X OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE CUE6043661850 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 10,000,000 $ DED X RETENTION $ 0 C WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN. ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTNE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below N / A WC6043661847 01/01/2017 01/01/2018 X STA UTE ER OTH- E,L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 E Prof Liability Claims Made LHR75062 RETRO DATE 8/27/1959 08/27/2016 08/27/2017 Occ/Aggr 2,000,000 Deductibl 200,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached•if more space is required) For bid purposes only , CERTIFICATE HOLDE R CANCELLATION CALVING Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc 1800 Eller Drive #600 Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2014/011 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH © 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and Joao are reaistered marks of ACORD RFQ No. 20 L7 -02.8 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED' BASIS 109 Calvin, Giordano Associates, Inc. CEPTIONAL S. 01. LI IIONS* LICENSES, CERTIFICATES, REGISTRATIONS, AND PERMITS MISIIIMUM000.1M(001111[0101114*. APIRMINNINIMBANIMH State rida fleets Is authorized under the provisiqns to the public through a ProfessiolaLE. Expiration: 2/28/2019 Audit No: 228201902481 R Inc. /- Lc); fl(I WOOF \ (1.0 s, to offer engineering services d Chapter 471, Florida Statutes. CA Lic. No: 514 State of Florida Board of ProfessioriatEngineers Attests that Mohamed Mabrouk P.E. Is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 RE, Lic. No: Audit No: 223201.931531 R 74614 Stato.'' of: Florida Board 6f; Professional -001-leers ,,7601.tha:t,,,,,,, five, Fpfix, ' bert Gargiii , P,, if8,1 i' BIT - A 4 In s licesed as a ProfessiunalEnguteetundct t:hailtet 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28r/2019 IRE. i.i,. Sr , , Audit No: 2282019035,10 R , ' 72293 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH REQ No, 2017 -028 -KB 1 VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 110 Calvin, Giordano Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' State of:F m ida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Hugo E. Da Silva , Is licensed as a Professional Engineer:under Chapt Expiration: 2/28/2019 Audit No: 228201921190 R mIMINIOY.OommorMPOW. r 471, Florida Statutes PE. Lit. No: 7249 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH apter 471, Florida Statutes P.E. Lic. No: 77577 RFQ No. 2017-028-K81VAC-11011S CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS-NEEDEDBASIS 111 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' Is licensed as a Professio9,, Expiration: 2/28/2017 Audit No: 228201719240 LORIIM 110.11,M OF IUI IVAN:111th ter 471, Florida Statutes P.E. Lic. No: 61881 STEVEN MICHAELWATTS 261.1 NE 50TH STREET LIGHTHOUSE POINT, R 33054 Itomotaints0 Pint License Type License# Fssuedi Expires Status Surveyor and Mapper LS4588 07115188 02/28/1g Active Surveyor of Record For L6791 06/20197 02/28/1g Active Surveyor of Record For LB7260 06/23/03 02/28/1g Active Stat rida Board �f Prot:68s' ional Engineers Attests that . . RolierttP1McSweeney, Is licensed as a Professional Eiigfde'6'tfriitida%Cliapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 P.E. Lie, Not Audit No: 228201923157 IL 47506 tL CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB VARIOUS CBI SERVICES ON AN 'AS -NEEDED" BASIS 1 112 Calvin, Giordano 6 Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAL SOLUTIONS' Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Uivisjon of C`eiitsumer Services I fLctnt" i Iu:: "i sStl 1V Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers Expiration Date February 28, 2019 2005 Apalachee l'kway'tallahassee, Florida 32399.6500 Professional Surveyor and Mapper License Under the provisions of Chapter 472, Florida Statutes MICHAEL MARK MOSSEY 11311. NW 37 ST, SUNRISE, FL 33323 ADAM H. PI.PTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE This is to certify that the professional sarveyar and mapper Whose name and address are shown ab ovc is licensed as required by Chapter 472, Florid. Stang ff[oeiba o uft. of Cobr Cufortt nieiit IaStmcert fTniv thoh Has Ea k s'uteri!!+ e orrcp?ereti the count! of sfudy ft; OF ICES. SAMMY AND REID APPLICATIONS ;Pres r4cr!Glf TheFioridar4a isciaf(OH rrfCoda Eirfirce ment,I+u'. and is, there tt:fled to thi's Certificate of Achievement Dated this l4 n day ai 5;,7Yati3nl tpt, 209;5 This anail?ctlf&tR'tsWrni lead wish We sUWs011Ni aonxaNr, aF ar car Wnuing eo an Mon Iectuih neink. C r,Fuir.t :W�PEa5rX4 Carrif<.otm No. 05(17 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 113 Calvin, Giordano & Associates, inc. E .k C E P 'I I O W A L S O L LI 3 t tai N S" State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on June 27, 1985. The document number of this corporation is M17373. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2017, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 10, 2017, and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. CITY Ot MIAMI BEACII Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Tenth day of January, 2017 lex" Secretary of 'State Tracking Number: ,CC9065327953 To authenticate this c,ertlficate,visit the following site,entor this number, and ithen. follow the instructions displayed. haps://services.s mbizorg/Filings/Certificateof5tatas/CertiticateAutbeaticatlan: RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB 1 VARtO1IS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED" BASIS 114 Calvin, Giordano 6* Associates, Inc. EXCEP TIO \IAL SOLUTIONS' • Stat Boar rida \`. Pro Is authorized under the provisictR to the public through a Professio' Expiration: 2/28/2019 Audit No: 228201902029 R eers Inc. FBPE 8, to offer engineering services Chapter 471, Florida Statutes. CA Lic. No: 3684 State::(4BOrida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Julio *to, De Blas Is licensed as a Professional Engineer urider Chapter 471., Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 P.E. Lic. No: Audit No: 228201920497 R 64653 State of.Florida Board of Profe' ssional Engineers , Attests that PO" Pa D. Passe P.E. Is licensed as a Professional Engi1k Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2019 RE. Lie. Not Audit No: 228201913135 R • 34750 1.01.11.3.110.1011.MiliKINeasyla CITY OF MIAMI BEACH RVQ. No. 2011 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN `!AS -NEEDED" BASIS 115 Calvin. Giordano g Associates, Inc. EXCEPTIONAt, SOL1iTIONS4 State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on July 1, 1983. The document number of this corporation is 856982. further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2017, that its most recent annual report/unifonn business report was filed on January 5, 2017, and that its status is active. 1 further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Given under nty hand and the Great Seal qf the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Cctpital, this the Sixth day of January, 21117 _tR044 Secretary of State Tracking Number: CU1432379008 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,. and then follow the instructions dlisplayed. https://services.sunhiz.org/Filings/Certificate0iStatosiCertilkateAuthentication RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB I VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS -NEEDED' EAMS 116 ATTACHMENT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX E A BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017 -028 -KB PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION (CEI) FIRMS TO PROVIDE VARIOUS CEI SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS °FC 2 7.2•-K PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 36 AM BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements" of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 each occurrence - owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability - $ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 ®Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty (30) days written cancellation .notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RF Q 20 -028- B 37