2002-24856 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-24856
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON
JUNE 19, 2002, TO CONSIDER A WAIVER OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE FIRE STATION
NO.4 PROJECT SITE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 142-425(d) OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, IN ORDER TO ALLOW AN
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK FACING 69TH
STREET, AND ELIMINATE THE PROVISION OF THE REQUIRED ON-SITE
PARKING SPACES FOR THE FIRE STATION NO. 4 GENERAL
OBLIGATION BOND PROJECT.
WHEREAS, on November 2, 1999, the citizens of the City of Miami Beach
approved the $92 Million General Obligation Bond, of which $1,925,525 was
earmarked to supplement a previous appropriation of Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds, in the amount of $550,000, for the improvements to Fire
Station No.4; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2000, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
No. 41-99/00, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with the
architectural firm of MC Harry Associates, Inc., to develop design, construction
documentation, specifications, and to provide construction administration for the
project; and
WHEREAS, the project's scope generally encompasses the following
components: demolition of the 1960 addition which comprises the western (rear)
portion of the historic structure, relocation of the designated historic Fire Station
structure to a southwesterly location within the site, near the Indian Creek
Waterway, structural stabilization of the same at the new location, exterior finish
improvements and construction of a new state-of-the art Fire Station in a northerly
location on the site.
WHEREAS, additionally the project's program generally comprises the
construction of the following components: a three (3) bay "back-in" apparatus
facility, including new male and female restrooms, showers, locker rooms,
dormitories, office space, day room, mechanical room, storage, kitchen/ dining
room, gymnasium, alarm room/lobby, tank storage, and bunker gear; and
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2002, the Mayor and City Commission designated
the existing Fire Station No.4 an historic site; and
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2002, MC Harry and Associates, Inc., presented a
schematic design complying with the Administration's directives, and the project's
programmatic requirements established by City staff; and
WHEREAS, on April 9, 2002, the project's schematic design was presented
to the Historic Preservation Board, and the project was positively reviewed and
accepted by the Board's members, who made useful comments on the project's
current concept; and
WHEREAS, various site constraints impede the design's full compliance with
the Land Development Regulations requirements applicable to the project site; and
WHEREAS, Division IX, GU Government Use District - Section 142-425
entitled "Development regulations", paragraph (a) states that "the development
regulations (setbacks, floor area ratio, signs, parking, etc.) in the GU Government
Use District shall be the average of the requirements contained in the surrounding
zoning districts as determined by the Planning and Zoning Director, which shall be
approved by the City Commission"; and
WHEREAS, the project site is surrounded by RM-2 Residential Multi Family
District; and therefore, the setbacks requirements for the subject property are 20
feet for the front setback; 27 feet for the side setback; and 16.9 feet for the rear
setback; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Fire Station No.4 is encroaching 27 feet into the
required north side setback, and authorization to allow such encroachment into the
north side setback is sought; and
WHEREAS, additionally, pursuant to Sections 130-31, and 130-32, Parking
District No.1, thirty (30) on-site parking spaces are required for the site; and due to
site constraints, twenty-two (22) spaces are being provided in the new design, and
authorization to allow twenty-two (22) on-site parking spaces is sought; and
WHEREAS, the Administration after reviewing other design options for the
project, concurs with the consultants that the current scheme is the most feasible;
and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that a public hearing
shall be held on June 19, 2002, to consider a waiver of the Land Development
Regulations applicable to the Fire Station No.4 project site, pursuant to section
142-425(d) of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, in order to allow an
encroachment into the required setback facing 69th street, and reduce the required
on-site parking spaces for the Fire Station No.4 General Obligation Bond Project,
and the Administration is hereby authorized and directed to publish and distribute
the appropriate public notice of said public hearing at which time all interested
parties will be heard.
2
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of May ,2002.
~rf~
CITY CLERK
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM &
LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION
~
t;" - / J - en...--
DATED
Resolution No. 2002-24856
T:\AGENDA\2002\MA Y2902\REGULAR\FS4WVRRESO.doc
3
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
m
~
Condensed Title:
A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission setting a public hearing on June 19,2002, in accordance
with Section 142-425 (d) of the City Code, to consider a waiver of development regulations to allow an
encroachment into the required setback facing 69th Street, and eliminate the provision of the required
number of on-site parking spaces for the Fire Station No.4 Project.
Issue:
Should the Mayor and City Commission adopt the aforementioned Resolution setting a public hearing to
consider a waiver of the Land Development Regulations applicable to the Fire Station No.4 Project?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
Pursuant to the proposed improvements to Fire Station No.4, and the designation of the property as an
historic site, the Administration has established the programmatic requirements for the project. MC Harry
Associates, the City's consultant, was instructed to develop the conceptual design in accordance with the
established parameters defined by City staff. During the schematic design phase, as a result of site
constraints, and to attain the programmatic goals set for the project, (such as the preservation of the
historic structure as well as designing a state-of-the-art new Fire Station), it is necessary to request a
waiver of the Land Development Regulations related to setback requirements facing 69th Street and, on-
site parking requirements.
After reviewing numerous options with the City's consultants and City staff for the development of the
project's design, the Administration concurs that, the most feasible option will require that the
aforementioned Land Development Regulations be waive~ by the Mayor and City Commission. Therefore~
the Administration recommends the adoption of the Resolution by the Mayor and City Commission.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Amount to be expended:
D
Finance Dept.
Source of
Funds:
AGENDAITEM (;78
DATE S=-d9-aJ-
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139
www.ci.miami-beach.fl.us
To:
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Mayor David Dermer and
Members of the City Commission
Date: May 29, 2002
Jorge M. Gonzalez \~
City Manager (J.. ~ U
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON
JUNE 19, 2002, TO CONSIDER A WAIVER OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE FIRE STATION
NO.4 PROJECT SITE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 142-425(d) OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, IN ORDER TO ALLOW AN
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK FACING 69TH
STREET, AND ELIMINATE THE PROVISION OF THE REQUIRED ON-SITE
PARKING SPACES FOR THE FIRE STATION NO.4 GENERAL
OBLIGATION BOND PROJECT.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION:
From:
SUbject:
Adopt the Resolution.
ANALYSIS:
On November 2, 1999, the citizens of the City of Miami Beach voted on the $92 Million
General Obligation Bond, of which $1,925,525 was earmarked to supplement a previous
appropriation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, in the amount of
$550,000, for the improvements to Fire Station No.4.
On July 12, 2000, pursuant to Request for Qualifications, (RFQ) No. 41-99/00, the City
entered into a Professional Services Agreement with the architectural firm of MC Harry
Associates, Inc., to develop design and construction documentation, specifications, and to
provide construction administration for the project.
Subsequently, the Capital Improvement Projects Office conducted a series of workshops
and meetings with URS Corporation, the City's Parks and Facilities Program Manager, Fire
Department personnel, Historic Preservation staff, MC Harry Associates, Inc., the project's
architect, to establish the programmatic requirements of the project. Commissioner Luis R.
Garcia Jr. also participated in this process. Various design options have been considered
for the improvement of the site. In the interim, on March 20, 2002, the Mayor and City
Commission designated the existing Fire Station NO.4 an historic site. Designed by the
recognized local architect Robert Law Weed in 1937, the building is a distinctive landmark
within the North Beach Community.
The project's scope and program were established as follows:
1
Proiect scope:
The project's scope generally encompasses the following components:
. Demolition of the 1960 addition which is the western (rear) portion of the historic
structure.
. Relocation of the designated historic Fire Station structure to a westerly location
within the site, near the Indian Creek Waterway, and structural stabilization of the
same at the new location, and exterior finish improvements.
. Construction of a new state-of-the art Fire Station in a northerly location on the site.
Proiect proaram:
The project's program generally comprises the construction of the following components:
. A three (3) bay "back-in" apparatus facility, including new male and female
restrooms, showers, locker rooms, and dormitories; office space, day room,
mechanical room, storage, kitchenl dining room, gymnasium; alarm room/lobby;
tank, and bunker gear storage.
On March 22, 2002, MC Harry and Associates, Inc. presented a schematic design
complying with the Administration's directives, and the project's programmatic
requirements established by City staff (Attachment 1). The concept drawings presented by
MC Harry Associates, Inc., include the relocation of the existing Fire Station structure that
was designated historic by the Mayor and City Commission on March 20, 2002, to a
southwesterly location within the site, nearthe Indian Creek Waterway. The neo-classical
faCfade of the relocated building retains its easterly orientation, facing Indian Creek Drive.
A preliminary review of the flood criteria requirements for the site indicates that the ground
level of the relocated structure must be situated at an elevation above 8' NGVD (National
Geodetic Vertical Datum). Consequently, the existing Pump Station will have a lesser
impact on the historic building's sight line from Indian Creek Drive. The landscaping buffer,
proposed around the Pump Station will also isolate, and camouflage this facility from the
rest of the site. An open landscaped area connects the Police Substation parking lot in the
south of the site, the relocated historic Fire Station in the west, and the new state-of-the art
Fire Station to the north. It also connects the public walk, adjacent to the Indian Creek
Seawall, to Indian Creek. The new Fire Station building's north taCfade aligns with the 69th
Street edge of the right-of-way.
On April 9, 2002, the schematic design presented to the Historic Preservation Board was
positively reviewed and accepted by the Board's members, who made useful comments on
the project's current concept.
At this time, many constraints impede the designer to fully comply with all the Land
Regulations requirements applicable to the project site:
. The designation of the existing Fire Station as an historic site limits the options tor
the development of the project. The current structure cannot be demolished, nor
modified radically to meet the program requirements of the new project.
. The relocation of the existing pump station and appurtenant underground utilities
2
currently in a prime location on the site, near Indian Creek Drive, would be very
expensive, and is not funded.
. Deed restrictions and FPL's underground wiring in the 69th Street right-of-way also
limit the City's option to develop that site.
. As a result of the concerns expressed by members of the City Commission
regarding the proximity of the apartment complex in the south, and the nuisance
impact of day-to-day operations and maneuvering of the emergency trucks to the
residents, the Administration abandoned the idea of constructing the new building in
a southerly location on the site.
Therefore, to satisfy the above constraints, and meet the project programmatic needs, it
is deemed necessary for the Administration to request that the following Land
Development Regulations be waived by the Mayor and City Commission:
Proposed setbacks modifications: (See Attachment 1)
Division IX GU Government Use District - Section 142-425 entitled Development
Regulations paragraph (a) states as follows:
"The development regulations (setbacks, floor area ratio, signs, parking, etc.) in the GU
Government Use District shall be the average of the requirements contained in the
surrounding zoning districts as determined by the Planning and Zoning Director, which
shall be approved by the City Commission."
The project site is surrounded by RM-2 Residential Multi Family District. Therefore, the
setbacks requirements for the subject property are as follows:
. Front setback:
. Side setback:
. Rear setback:
20 feet
27 feet; 8% of the lot width: (337' x 8%)
16.9 feet; 10% of the lot depth: (169' x 10%)
The following tables are synopsis of the setbacks site analysis:
A. Relocated Historic Building Setbacks:
Description Required setback Provided setback Remarks
1.Front setback 20' 111' No waiver required
2.North setback 2T 163' No waiver reauired
3.South setback 2T 125' No waiver reauired
4.west setback 16.9' 17' No waiver reauired
B. New Fire Station No 4 Building Setbacks:
Description Required setback Provided setback Remarks
1.Front setback 20' 50' No waiver reauired
2.North setback 27' 0' 2T Waiver reauired
3.South setback 2T 221' No Waiver reauired
4.West setback 16.9' 17' No waiver reauired
3
In conclusion, the Administration requests that the Mayor and City Commission waive the
Land Development Regulations regarding the setback requirements, for the new Fire
Station.
C. On - Site Parkina:
The on-site parking requirements are as follows:
Description Required parking Proposed parking Remarks
soaces spaces
1. Historic Building 0 0
2. New Fire Station 18 10
3. Police sub-station 12 12
Subtotal
Total 30 22 Waiver of 8 parking spaces
reaulred
Pursuant to Sections 130-31, and 130-32, Parking District No.1, thirty (30) on-site parking
spaces are required for the site.
The existing Police Substation parking lot in the south, has currently eleven (11) parking
spaces. The lot layout will be modified to accommodate an additional ten (10) spaces for a
total of twenty-one (21). One (1) handicap parking space will also be added on-site in the
proximity of 69th Street. Therefore, there is a deficit of eight (8) on-site parking spaces, for
which the Administration requests that the Mayor and City Commission waive the Land
Development requirements for on-site parking applicable to the Fire Station Project site.
As part of Section 142-425, it is also requested that by this action the City Commission
affirm the Planning Department Director's determination of the applicable setback
requirements of the RM-2 for the subject site as described herein.
The Administration recommends the adoption of the Resolution by the Mayor and City
Commission.
Attachment
JMG/CMC/JG/MM
T:\AGENDA\2002\MAY2902\REGULARlFS4WAIVR.doc
4
MAY. 14.2002 5:36PM
Me HARRY ASSOC
NO. 679 P.2/2
ATTACHMENT 1
\
S:
-.
Q
(/)3
rT1 _.
OJ OJ
)>(1) I
nQ I
~ () 'I
"'-... ::,-
~ I !
I~ " j
~ &. I
--Co/) I
~QJ
-+-
v, o.
~ :J "'-,
C):ij:
-<~
'-'VI' /''':':~
t. '. ~M. l.... .
7;:O~,\ "", :~
., ".' f... .i>>
rill. I i--", ~1,f'.1
W .:t ~ ~~J\tV
I
I
I
\
\
.
I
r:-::\ ....,-",,, ~
(".\. 1',"""-' :) f"!'.._ lZ1
,,' .,'" '~
"~"llO\ ...,,,,~ ~ ~
~~v;.\ ~'-'~ ::,,' ,I'. ~
lor :'" 1.,) ~,:)!~ ~,,"-""..
,j:r '.:::.a~~~~... ...,:::..t..
'p~
t~;,
b.x \~~~:?
; I