LTC 139-2002
...
. .
.
...
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
Office of the City Manager
Letter to Commission No. /39. 2tJ1}2
m
From:
Mayor David Dermer and
Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez \. ~..........---
City Manager ( ) IV - I
2002 ASSESSMk"'NT ROLL ESTIMATE
Date: May 31, 2002
To:
Subject:
As required by Florida Statute, the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser advised us that
the 2002 Assessment Roll Estimate for the City of Miami Beach is $10,180,000,000. The
preliminary estimate is for budget planning purpose only. The official assessment will be
released on July 1, 2002.
This estimate represents an increase of 8.3% over the 2001 preliminary assessment of
$9,398,715,152. At this time, the estimate does not provide break-out of new construction
or for the Redevelopment Districts.
JM~oJYfu /
Attac~ent /1
c: Executive Staff
OMB Staff
~
~aY-'1-2002 .10:42
FrOll-MDCPA
305-375-3024
T-684 P.001/002 F-087
.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
~!~~.
11'01" ~'. '. .~.l
I~::',~~~'d
~!~
~~
STEPHEN P. CLARK CENTER
.
May 31, 2002
DEPARTMENT 0' PROPI!RTY APPRAISAL
ADMINISTHATlVE DIVISION
SUITE 710
111 I~W 1 ST STREET
MIAMI FLOI~IDA ~128'1984
(305) 375-4004
FAX (305) 376-3024
www.co.maMI-<fIlde.ft.ualpa
MS. Patricia Walker
Finance Director
City ot Miami Be~ch
1700 Convention Center Prive
Miami Beach, FL 33139
RE: 2002 Assessment Roll Estimate
Dear Ms. Walker:
The following estituate is being provided in accordance with Ch;lpter
200.065(7), Florida Statutes, which states:
~ (7) The 'Property Appraiser J/hlill deliver 1:0 the prlisiding
officer ot each l:4X'ing i/luthorjey within the Couney, June 1.:, an
9J/timilte of ehe total ilssessed value of non-exempc propert), for
thfil current: year tor budget: plann:i.ng purposes."
The Certification of Taxable Value (Form DR-420) will be delivere:d to
all taxing authorities on July lOt. Recei~t of these values on July 10'
initiates the Statutory budgec and millage cal~ndar.
The month of June is the most aotive and concentrated period at th", end
of the assessment cycle in terms of preparing the assessment: roll. for
completion by July 1.'. A.!I such, the projections ueed in preparinsr the
figure provided below represent the best estimate available for
measuring the changes caking effect during June.
$10,190,000,000
Sincerely,
~~~
J 1 . RoblJins
Pr ty Appraiser