Loading...
Agreement with H.W. Lochner, Inc. a017- 300.9 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND H.W. LOCHNER, INC. FOR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS (PROJECT) PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-126-KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-30029 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 16 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 18 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANTS ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 19 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 19 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 20 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 21 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 22 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 23 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 23 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 24 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 24 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A — SCOPE OF SERVICES 29 SCHEDULE A-1 - CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER (ADDITIONAL SERVICES) 33 SCHEDULE B - COMPENSATION 34 SCHEDULE C — HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE 35 SCHEDULE D - CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E - PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F - APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 38 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A — Resolution, Commission Item, Commission Memorandum 39 ATTACHMENT B - RFQ 40 ATTACHMENT C — Consultant's Response to the RFQ 41 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND H.W. LOCHNER, INC. FOR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and H.W. LOCHNER INC., a Florida corporation having its principal office 8750 N.W. 36 Street, Suite 360, Miami, FL. 33178 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the RFQ No. 2017-126-KB (the "RFQ") was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on October 18th, 2017, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017- 30029, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with H.W. Lochner Inc., and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. 4 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Scope of Services set forth in Schedule A hereto. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in Schedule D. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. 5 CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The following Subconsultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean any work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A-1 attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Additional Services which may be required of Consultant that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. The provisions in this Agreement relating to Contract Documents, Construction Cost, Construction Cost Budget, Statement of Probable Construction Cost, or the DCP shall apply to the extent set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents' shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 6 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents, FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure' shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, 7 unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Scope of Services set forth in Schedule A hereto. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in Schedule A hereto. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A– Scope of Services Schedule A-1 - Consultant Service Order Schedule B–Consultant Compensation Schedule C – Hourly Billing Rate Schedule Schedule D– Construction Cost Budget Schedule E –Project Schedule Schedule F—Approved Subconsultants SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by 8 the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. SUBCONSULTANT: Any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to the Project. Any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The following Subconsultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: (Schedule "F") WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total completion, construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as more particularly described in Schedule A. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written notice to proceed with any of the specific tasks identified in Schedule A ("Task") signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator ("Notice to Proceed"). Consultant shall countersign the Notice to Proceed upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. A separate Notice to Proceed issued by the Project Administrator shall be required prior to commencement of each task (as same are set forth in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant shall have no entitlement to perform (or be compensated for) the Services corresponding with any task under this Agreement, unless such task is authorized by a Notice to Proceed. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or 9 adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised by similarly-situated professionals performing similar services in the design or planning of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). . 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Scope of Services; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any negligent design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Consultant's Work, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and Consultant's Work. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement, With respect to the performance of Services by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such services, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's services. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect until all Services are completed or all Services authorized under Notices to Proceed are completed and accepted, whichever is later. Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Scope of Services, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for the Project. 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with 10 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a signed Notice to Proceed, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper 12 performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and any Consultant Service Orders, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under Schedule A and any Consultant Service Orders issued to Consultant by the City. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in Schedule A (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANTS OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANTS OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 13 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, within the standard of care, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, 14 information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager 15 (and any replacements)and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to 16 Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include, but are not limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Work, Design Documents or Construction Documents, if any, shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. 17 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" fee for provision of the Services, including reimbursable expenses, for the Project shall be $638.161, as more fully delineated in Schedule B hereto. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). If the City objects to any invoice submitted by Consultant, City shall so advise Consultant in writing giving reasons therefor within fourteen (14) days following City's receipt of such notice. No mark-up shall be allowed on Subconsultants or subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly billing rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount set forth in Schedule B or in the applicable Consultant Service Order. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City Manager, at his sole discretion, may consider an adjustment to the hourly rates set forth in Schedule C. Any such adjustments, if any, shall be based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States 18 Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, provided, however, that in no event shall any annual increase exceed three percent (3%). In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City, but only to the extent the City has paid for that portion of the Work performed by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or 19 make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Notwithstanding any other terms in or applicable to this Agreement, subject to City's prior approval which shall not be reasonably withheld, the Consultant may retain an irrevocable, worldwide, nonexclusive license to reuse the documents. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any material provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's 20 initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). In the event of Termination of Consultant only, the City acknowledges that the use of any incomplete or partial material prepared by Consultant shall be utilized by the City at the City's risk. The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14)days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the 21 State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $2,000,000 with the deductible per claim. Consultant shall notify the Project Administrator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability policy. 11.2 Except for Professional Liability, Workers Compensation, and Employer's Liability, the City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation, substantial modifications, or nonrenewal of any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either 22 through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes or design changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultants errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager or the City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by City to the Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 23 SUBJECT TO CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 558.0035, FLORIDA STATUTES, A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CONSULTANT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE OCCURRING WITHIN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: H.W. Lochner, Inc. 8750 NW 36 Street Suite 360 Miami, FL. 33178 Attn: James Spinks III Phone: 305-503-9873 Email: jspinkshwlochner.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that 24 applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Proiect Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an 25 agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 26 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 27 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by the parties hereto, as of the date first written above. Attest CITY OF 1 I BEACH: ilIffittIV - . CITY ERK \ `8t OR F Attest * .H W::Lt5CIINER INC ti /(:.2, - Th 4.1..,./t . A. At._,...! 1 Signature/Secre.. ry tgnature/President 0,4,6(a, (!JPrnf /®t&.r JP9,1/At % Crimc r Print Name Print Name SL i�A ; APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE r &FOR EXECUTION g^OMg_ 4 - ate City Attorney FLAT Date 28 LOCHNER Corporate Signing Authority — Fiscal Year 18-19 H. W. Lochner, Inc. The Board has approved the following corporate signing authorities effective April 11, 2018. 1. The following individuals are hereby acknowledged as Officers of the corporation and are authorized to execute contracts and bonds in the name and on behalf of said company subject to the limitations contained in 1A and 1B below, and such execution of any contract or obligation in this company's name on its behalf by such individual, shall be valid and binding upon this company. Harry W. Lochner, Jr. Chairman, Treasurer Jeanne T. Cormier President and CEO Roy D. Bruce Senior Vice President/Director of Corp Services Phillip E. Russell Senior Vice President/RTL David A. Twiddy. Jr. Senior Vice President/RTL Vance T. Henry Senior Vice President/RTL David R. Isabelle Senior Vice President/RTL A. For contracts, subcontracts, amendments, change orders, or bonds exceeding $5,000,000 in value, the Chairman or President/CEO shall execute them or with written authorization from the Chairman or President/CEO any of the above listed officers may execute them on behalf of the company. B. All foreign client contracts,joint venture agreements, individual consultant, leases for non- project real property and any claim settlements shall be approved and/or executed by the Chairman or President/CEO. C. For contracts, subcontracts and joint venture agreements providing for (i) liquidated damages in excess of$1,000,000, (ii) consequential damages, or(iii) indemnification provisions for breaches of general representations that are uncapped or capped in excess of 10% of the purchase price or value, the Chairman or President/ CEO shall approve and/or execute them. 2. The following are empowered in their role as corporate officers to execute documents as Corporate Secretary and Assistant Corporate Secretary on behalf of the organization: Barbara Clemens-Novak Corporate Secretary John Cook Vice President -Assistant Corporate Secretary 3. Those individuals acknowledged as Senior Vice Presidents or RTL's of the corporation are authorized to execute contracts and bonds in the name and on behalf of said company subject to a maximum amount of$5,000,000. They are also authorized to sign supplements to existing contracts or agreements which relate to scope of work, extension of time or increase in total contract cost, up to an aggregate maximum value of$5 million on that project. A. They are also authorized on the same basis to sign agreements with other firms who are acting as subconsultants to H. W. Lochner, Inc. provided the Subconsultant Agreement document is in substantial accordance with the standard form approved at that time by H. W. Lochner, Inc. B. They are authorized to sign Subconsultant Agreements where H. W. Lochner, Inc. will serve as a Subconsultant to another firm where the total fee of the Subconsultant Agreement does not exceed S5 million. For such agreements with values over$5 million, or where an aggregate contract value exceeds $5 million, paragraph '1 or 3' above shall apply. 4. Those individuals acknowledged as Vice Presidents of the corporation are authorized to execute contracts and bonds in the name and on behalf of said company subject to a maximum amount of $1,000,000 but allows an RTL to delegate up to$2,000,000 in signing authority on an 'as appropriate' basis. They are also authorized to sign supplements to existing contracts or agreements which relate to scope of work, extension of time or increase in total contract cost, up to an aggregate maximum value of$1 million on that project or$2 million if delegated by the RTL. A. They are also authorized on the same basis to sign agreements with other firms who are acting as subconsultants to H.W. Lochner, Inc. provided the Subconsultant Agreement document is in substantial accordance with the standard form approved at that time by H. W. Lochner, Inc. B. They are authorized to sign Subconsultant Agreements where H. W. Lochner, Inc.will serve as a Subconsultant to another firm where the total fee of the Subconsultant Agreement does not exceed $1 million (or$2 million as delegated by the RTL). For such agreements with values over$2 million, or where an aggregate contract value exceeds$2 million, paragraph '3 or 4'above shall apply. 5. The Director of Finance has authority to do the following: • Sign office space leases with concurrence of the Chairman or President/CEO, after consultation with the RTL and the concerned office manager. • Initiate routine bank loan actions to manage cash flow, with concurrence of the Chairman or President/CEO. • Undertake wire transfers or other payments between Lochner's bank and Lochner accounts, and transfer funds between Lochner accounts, including Lochner's 401 K and ESOP accounts. • Execute vehicle and equipment leases, after consultation with the concerned RTL or corporate department director. I hereby certify that I am the Secretary of H.W. Lochner, Inc., that the above-named individuals are the elected Officers as indicated of said company, and that the above authority, including contract authority for Vice Presidents and Senior Associates has not been amended or rescinded and remains in full force and effect as of this date. t/-/4 _l._,.,., / ',e, ,.i {20✓ Date Secj:ry OGHN is' SEAL H availability that can be provided only by consulting firms. Tasks require demonstrated experience in current Complete Streets, Smart Growth, multimodal transportation planning, and livability practices. Experience in the integration of transportation and land use is critical to the success of these studies. 2. Transit Operations Planning The City may require that the Consultant provide transit operations plans related to existing and future Trolley service. This may include conducting transit feasibility studies, to include modifications to existing trolley operations, potential new route alignments and ridership projections. 3. Facilities Planning and Development Plan and develop transportation related facilities for the City of Miami Beach. 4. Public Participation The Consultant will establish and implement comprehensive public participation programs and outreach activities for planning studies and projects that meet the requirements of federal, state, regional and local processes. Consultant team should be knowledgeable in: a. Issues affecting urban development/ redevelopment; b. Issues affecting environmentally sensitive environments with significant land use constraints; c. Stakeholder identification and communication; d. Meeting facilitation; e. Group decision making processes; f. Establishing effective working relationships with community and team members; and g. Executing successful media strategies, products and events. 5. Financial Planning and Analysis The Consultant will support City of Miami Beach projects by providing financial planning and analysis, as requested. Tasks may include but not be limited to: a. Market and Development Analysis - national experience in: economics, real estate development (as a successful real estate developer or expertise in analyzing projects that were constructed); station area/transit real estate development/financial analysis; economic and fiscal impact; economic (re)development; and new transit 30 system development and/or evaluation; b. Financial Feasibility Studies; c. Funding Source Identification (new and existing) for the City of Miami Beach program of projects; d. Project Budget Estimates; e. Project Expenditure forecasts; and f. Preparation of the required reports for these processes, if requested. 6. Environmental Sustainability Analysis The City of Miami Beach is a leader in area of environmental sustainability, and the City's adopted transportation mode share priorities support its environmental goals. The Consulting team should have experience in incorporating environmental best practices into transportation studies and projects. Experience in incorporating environmental performance measures into short and long range transportation plans and projects would also be helpful. 7. Transit Intermodal Facility Development, compliant with the provisions for such facilities as described in the Transportation Element of the City's 2025 Comprehensive Plan. The Consultant will work with City of Miami Beach staff and stakeholders to determine appropriate measures for implementing intermodal hubs. The Consultant will inventory and evaluate implementing tools and strategies used in other cities with similar transit levels of services and provide recommendations to the City of Miami Beach. 8. Urban Design The Consultant should be familiar with current planning issues and regulations in South Florida, with experience in transit-oriented development planning. The Consultant should also have experience working with community and agency stakeholders to design high quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that may include but not be limited to shared use paths, greenways, beach walks, dedicated bicycle lanes, and transit facilities. 9. Transit Oriented Development. Experience developing and implementing guidelines that emphasize pedestrian- scale development and transit and non-motorized-accessible site plans. 10. Project Control and Management It is expected that the Consultant's project management team will bring the following experience and skills in the following areas of project control and 31 management: a. Effective work planning, monthly progress reporting, and invoicing; b. Schedule control, time management, monitoring, and reporting; c. Budgeting control, monitoring, and reporting; d. Quality control; e. Establish teamwork within consulting team, the City of Miami Beach, other consultants and stakeholders; and f. Conduct regularly scheduled project meetings with City of Miami Beach and relevant study committees and prepare and distribute project-meeting minutes to all participating stakeholders; 32 SCHEDULE A-1 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES Service Order No. for Additional Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 33 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration ** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note*s: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 34 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFQ 2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED CATEGORIES HOURLY RATES Project Principal $275.00 Senior Project Manager $260.00 Project Manager $200.00 Chief Engineer $237.00 Chief Designer $207.00 Chief Planner $207.00 Senior Engineer $185.00 Senior Landscape Architect $170.00 Senior Traffic Engineer $170.00 Senior Planner $170.00 Traffic/Project Engineer $105.00 Engineer $105.00 Landscape Architect $105.00 Planner $105.00 Graphic Designer $110.00 Senior CAD Technician $90.00 Landscape Architect -Associate $90.00 Engineering Intern $90.00 CAD Technician $75.00 Clerical $75.00 Administrative Assistant $75.00 35 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 36 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 37 SCHEDULE F APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 1) CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS 2) METRIC ENGINEERING INC 3) BERMELLO AJAMIL & PARTNERS INC 4) PLUSURBIA DESIGN 5) FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORATION CONSULTANTS 6) GRIDICS LLC 7) WTL + A 8) BOOTHE TRANSIT CONSULTING LLC 9) ACE PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUP LLC 10)MAGBE CONSUTLING SERVICES INC 11) MANUEL G VERA& ASSOCIATES INC 12)TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA 13)ELAND ENGINEERING INC 14)WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 15)CLOUDPARC 16)ECOSTATA SERVICES INC 17)QUALITY COUNTS 38 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 39 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-30029 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2017.126-KB, FOR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS"; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES, ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH HNTB CORPORATION, AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; NELSONINYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; H.W. LOCHNER, INC., AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; GANNETT FLEMING, INC., AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.. AS THE SIXTH RANKED PROPOSER; MARLIN ENGINEERING, INC., AS THE SEVENTH RANKED PROPOSER; ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN, INC., AS THE EIGHTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on April 26, 2017, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-126-KB for General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an"As Needed Basis'; and WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No. 2017-126-KB (the 'RFQ') was released on April 28, 2017; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the RFQ was to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for transportation planning and traffic engineering services, in accordance with the requirements of Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS,a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on May 9, 2017; and WHEREAS, on June 14, 2017, the City received a total of 17 proposals; and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on August 7, 2017 to consider the 17 proposals; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking was as follows: HNTB corporation, as the first ranked proposer, Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, H.W. Lochner, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; Gannett Fleming, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; Kittelson & Associates, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh ranked proposer Ma Planning+ Design, Inc., as the eighth ranked proposer, Keith And Schnars, P.A., as the ninth ranked proposer, WSP USA, Inc., as the tenth ranked proposer, Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc., as the eleventh ranked proposer; The Corradino Group, Inc., as the twelfth ranked proposer; The Street Plans Collaborative, Inc.. tied as the twelfth ranked proposer, AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the fourteenth ranked proposer, Kimley-Horn And Associates, Inc.; tied as the fourteenth ranked proposer; Zyscovich, Inc., as the sixthteenth ranked proposer, and Atkins North America, Inc.,as the seventeenth ranked proposer, and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings, and the implementation of the Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan, the City Manager has recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to general transportation planning and traffic engineering services, and further authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with each of proposers, and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations;and WHEREAS, as the City identifies projects and transportation planning needs, the City will engage in a competitive selection to identify from the consultant pool established herein, the most qualified firm to perform services; and the selected firm shall be awarded such work through a service order/task order to the agreement the contractor executes with the City pursuant to this RFQ solicitation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No, 2017-126-KB for General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an 'As Needed Basis'; authorize the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to general transportation planning and traffic engineering services; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with HNTB corporation, as the first ranked proposer, Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; H.W. Lochner, Inc., as the third ranked proposer, Gannett Fleming, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer, Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer, Kittelson & Associates, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh ranked proposer, Alta Planning + Design, Inc., as the eighth ranked proposer, and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this if day of OChAr 2a Philip Lev !fes U1 Q, •.... . ...'�0' !•() APPROVED AS 70 Rafael E. Granado, ,,,,_ ",erk\�}�n,� � r FORM&LANGUAGE jtr • - . &FOR FXECUTIOkI '1`; -' -`L t {t(FIS F:WURLYEALL1SalicigGan&1T3�11y1p6�1t,-3�PiL LPaIteraylPlamag Conwlbnt for Tra �qJt Q Commission Documenbl9] P ri ',VCVr'.�`;,� GPC,H)etlulion 9.22.11.doc /,p rap I Zi 111t'1 scany Wy` ,, Resolutions-C7 C MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Mentors of the City Conrission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales. City Manager DATE: October 18, 2017 SUBJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2017- 126-KB, FOR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS"; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE- QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES, ON AN "AS NEEDED" BASIS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH HNTB CORPORATION, AS THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; NELSON/NYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; H.W. LOCHNER, INC.,AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; GANNETT FLEMING, INC., AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER; CALVIN, GIORDANO&ASSOCIATES, INC.,AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE SIXTH RANKED PROPOSER; MARLIN ENGINEERING, INC., AS THE SEVENTH RANKED PROPOSER; ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN, INC., AS THE EIGHTH RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS The City's current agreements for general transportation planning and traffic engineering consulting services had an initial term commencing on October 11, 2012 through October 10, 2016, with a provision Slowing the term could be extended for an additional two (2) years through October 10, 2018. At this time, the Transportation Department is seeking to replace the existing contracts to pursue proposals from firms that can provide transit planning and implementation of transit projects that require the coordination of land use decisions, which include the focusing of nixed-use development into key locations throughout the region and the promotion of transit,pedestrian, bicycle and auto accessibility. Given that the scope of future assignments is unknown at this time, it is important to create a robust pool to expedite future needs. Therefore, the City of Miami Beach seeks to contract with a pool of qualified consultants to provide Page 200 of 1633 professional services transportation planning and related services on an "as needed basis." The Consultants shall provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miarri Beach specialiang in planning for transportation and related projects Suggested specialintions include, but are not limited to: general transportation planning, snort growth, livable cities, complete streets, integration of transportation and urban design, econonic and financial analysis, transit planning, bicycle and pedestrian planning, station area planning,and traffic engineering. RFQ PROCFSS In order to carylete a successor agreement, on April 26, 2017, the City Comrtission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No. 2017-126-KB for General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an "as needed basis.° On April 28, 2017, the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on May 9, 2017. RFQ responses were due and received on June 14, 2017.The City received a total of 17 proposals from the following firrrs: •AECOM Technical Services, Inc., •Ma Planning+ Design, Inc. •Atkins North America, Inc. • Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc. • Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Gannett Fleming, Inc. • HNTB Corporation • H.W. Lochner, Inc. • Keith and Schnars, P.A • Kimiey-Horn and Associates, Inc. • Kittelson&Associates, Inc. • Marlin Engineering, Inc. • Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. •The Corradino Group, Inc. •The Street Plans Collaborative, Inc. •WSP USA Inc. •Zyscovich, Inc. On July 11, 2017, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC It 362-2017. The Evaluation Corrrrittee convened on August 7, 2017, to consider proposals received.The Comrittee was comprised of Josiel Ferrer, Transportation Manager, Transportation Department, City of Miami Beach; Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning & Sustainability, Planning and Zoning Department, City of Miarri Beach; Lynda Westin, Transportation Manager, Transportation Department, City of Miami Beach; and Collin Worth, Bicycle Coordinator/Transportation Analyst, Office of Transportation Management, City of Miami.The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Govemment Sunshine Law.The Committee was also provided with general infonration on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers indicated in Attachment A, in the following order. 1. HNTB Corporation 2. Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. 3. H.W. Lochner, Inc. 4. Gannett Fleming, Inc. 5. Caton, Giordano&Associates, Inc. 6. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Page 201 of 1633 7. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 8.Alta Planning+ Design, Inc. 9. Keith and Schnars, P.A. 10. WSP USA, Inc. 11. Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. 12. The Corradino Group, Inc. 12. The Street Plans Collaborative, Inc. 14.AECOM Technical Services, Inc., 14. Kinsey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 16. Zyscovich, Inc. 17.Atkins North America, Inc. A summary of each top-ranked firm is available upon request. CONCLUSION The Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan, adopted in April of 2016, identified 102 potential projects in the next few years. The City Commission has directed Transportation staff to implement the Transportation Master Plan as quickly as possible. Each of the 102 projects identified in the plan will need an initial feasibility study followed by design development. This work Is primarily done by the Transportation General Planning Consultants (GPCs). Additionally, other project needs arise from time to time. As such, staff has expressed a need for a robust pool of consultants to be able to expeditiously address project needs. The current pool of Transportation GPCs consists of only four(4) firs. More than four GPC finis are needed to move projects forward quickly into project inplerrentation, as the exdstirg firms are at capacity with the various ongoing projects or studies, either with the City or elsewhere. For these reasons, the Transportation Department is recommending selection of the top eight (8) firrrs as ranked by the selection committee. After considering staffs recommendation and the results of the Evaluation Committee process, I recommend the selection of the top eight(8)firms as ranked by the selection committee. Doubling the number of firms will enable the Transportation Department to address project needs more expeditiously and begin project implementation sooner. The recorrmerded pool of eight (8) finis contains each individual Evaluation Cormittee members top four (4) highest ranked firms. Selecting a pool larger than eight (8) firms nay be too large for the anticipated work load. Additionally, several of the firs that are not in the pool of the eight (8) recommended firm are currently available either through the Miami Beach Architectural and Engineering (ME) list or nay be contracted, if needed, as sub-consultants to the eight(8)GPC firms being recommended. Therefore, after reviewing all the submissions, results of the evaluation process, and the anticipated irrplementation of the Miani Beach Transportation Master Plan projects, I recomrend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants for general transportation planning and traffic engineering services, pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, from the following firs qualified to perform the work HNTB corporation, as the first ranked proposer; Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, H.W. Lochner, Inc., as the third ranked proposer, Gannett Flerring, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer, Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc.,as the fifth ranked proposer; Kittelson&Associates, Ina,as the sixth ranked proposer, Marlin Engineering, Inc., as the seventh ranked proposer, Alta Planning + Design, Inc., as the eighth ranked proposer. Further, I recommend that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute agreements, upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration,with the prequalified firms. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Page 202 of 1633 Ensure Comprehensive Mobility Addressing AR Modes Throughout The City FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. Legislative Tracking Transportation/Procurerrent ATTACHMENTS Description ❑ Attacherr nt A-- Evaluation Committe Scoring and Ranking o Resolution • Page 203 of 1633 I 1=jcv a PIENiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiii L•Aiiiiiiiiiii • ju-Thascrinininie i . . - oc . .. 0 ,3 .. .,c , .„ .. .. . II - : - - • ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 40 MIAMIBEACH Procurement Department, 1755 Meridian Avenue,31'Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.mlamiheach11.gav,305-673-7490 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" June 14,2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Friday, July 14, 2017. at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3r° Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. • II. MODIFICATIONS: 1. APPENDIX C Minimum Requirements & Specifications, Subsection Cl has been modified as follows: PRIME PROPOSER: " ' * • 1. The Prime Proposer (Enginocring Firm) shall be a Planning, Architectural or Engineering firm -- : : •. •: • . .:•" : -- - '- e"..e• : Business--arid—Pa: =--'e'- ':e- - ':•-, -- -ee '--e : authorized to conduct business in the State of Florida. II. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. 0#1: Are there are any public information/public involvement/communications opportunities in BID RFQ #2017-126-KB- General Transportation Planning Consultant Services on "As Needed Basis." A#1: Yes, public Involvement and related activities may be included in task orders. Q#3: Solicitation number #2017-126-KB, General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an "As Needed Basis" requests the 'volume of contract"for each qualifying project on page 27 of the Request for Qualifications. Will you please clarify what is meant by"volume of contract"for the projects submitted on behalf of the Prime Proposer and Project Manager? 1 I ADDENDUM NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN'AS NEEDED BASIS' A#3: When submitting Information pertinent to volume of contract, please indicate the contract fee. Q#4: Is there an estimated budget available for this? A#4: Estimated budget is not available at the present time. Q#5: Does Miami Beach prefer to have the 10 copies submitted in three-ring binders also? A#5: Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, 1. Sealed Responses, requests the submittal of one original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3- ring binder), ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format). There is no specific requirement for the type of binding of the ten (10) copies. Q#6: Our firm recently submitted a response to an RFQ in April of this year for which we had to submit our DUNS report. Would we be required to submit another one for our response to this RFQ? A#6: Pursuant to Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, 3. Statements of Qualifications Format, Tab 2, Experience& Qualifications, 2.3 Financial Capacity,at the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Q#7: Please confirm the proposal delivery address is: • Natalia Delgado, Contracting Officer 1 City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3" Floor • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 A#7: The delivery address Indicated above is the address for the delivery of the proposals. Q#8: At the preproposal meeting City staff mentioned that work tasks might include design development. Should the response Include team resources for geometric design development, surveying, subsurface/utility investigation, and geotechnical analysis? A#6: The City anticipates up to 30% design for some tasks. The team should consist of technical specialties to facilitate conceptual design development. Q#9: Do you require Dun and Bradstreet SQR and submittal requirements from Appendix A from the Prime only? A#9: Yes, at the request of the City the Dun and Bradstreet SQR is to be submitted for the Prime only. Q#10: Miami Beach General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an "As Needed Basis", Solicitation No. 2017-126-KB, ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE, sub article 11.2 requires naming the City as an additional insured on liability 2I REQUEST NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS O.N017-126-KB MOTR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN'AS NEEDED BASIS' policies on page 54 of the sample agreement. This is acceptable with respect to General Liability and Automobile Liability policies. However, this is not possible for the Professional ' Liability policy. Please confirm that this sub article pertains only to the General Liability and Automobile Liability policies and not to Professional Liability policy. A1110: The request to name the City as an additional insured on the liability policies is only applicable to general and automobile liability. Q#11: The indemnification in Section 40. of the RFP is inconsistent with the indemnification in Article 12. of the Sample Contract, and more broad than what is allowable in Section 725.08 of the Florida Statutes. Can this be updated for consistency, so that both sections are equivalent to that listed in the Sample Contract? A#11: Indemnification language will be agreed upon during the negotiation process with the awarded firm(s). Q#12: The Sample Contract Article 11.2 requires us to name the City as additional insured on all the policies. Additional insured cannot be named on the Workers' Compensation or Professional Liability policies, can the city add an exclusion for these policies in the contract language? M12: Please refer to response to Q10 above. Q#13: Can you please clarify the difference in what is being requested between Tab 1, 1.3 • Minimum Qualification Requirements and the Tab 2, Experience and Qualifications items 2.1 and 2.2. Both areas of the RFQ seem to ask for similar information. For Appendix C, item C.2 specifically— what is being requested from proposers for this section (e.g., qualifications, approach, etc.). It appears qualifications and approach are covered under Tab 2 and Tab 3 already. Clarification for this piece under Tab 1, 1.3 is appreciated. A#13: Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, 3. Statements of Qualifications Format indicates how the City recommends that the Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed. Tab 1, 1.3 will include verifiable information documenting compliance with Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications, Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. Tab 2. Experience & Qualifications will include Information pertaining to Appendix .I C, Minimum Requirements& Specifications, C2. Statement of Work Required. 0#14: Are there any specific forms or certifications that subconsultants need to submit as part of our proposal, or are those only to be completed by the Prime Proposer? A#14: No, there are no specific forms or certifications that need to be submitted by the subconsultants as part of the proposal. Q#15: Are Proposers required to obtain a business license in the City of Miami Beach prior to proposal submittal? A#15: Please refer to Section I. Modifications. 3IADDENDUM NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN'AS NEEDED BASIS' Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at Rafael Gm nado(a�mi a m i beachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000, ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pro sal. i c ely, ex Is • • rocurement Director • i dIADDENDUM NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-126-KB GENERAL.TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN'AS NEEDED BASIS' MIAMIBEACH Procurement Department, 1755 Merdan Avenue,3'1 Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachf.gov,305-673-7490 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" June 5, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined)_ I. ATTACHMENTS (Unintentionally Omitted from Addendum No.1): Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-In Sheet A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the Individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at . RafaelGranadof miamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: I Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000, ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete . and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders' questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a pr.:.sal. i ,rely, •x D- 1sr Art " OC 'i ment Director 1 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN'AS NEEDED BASIS' SCHEDULE A- SCOPE OF SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall provide professional services, transportation planning, traffic engineering, and related services on an "as needed basis' pursuant to the Agreement. Each firm awarded a contract hereby agrees to be placed on a list of professionals that will provide general transportation planning and traffic engineering consultant services where the City may call upon them to perform professional services for certain City projects, (the Project or Projects), as assigned by the City, in its sole discretion and judgment. As the need for service arises, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. Professional services will be quoted as a not to exceed or lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete a project and in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C' of this Agreement. The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order; the Consultant shall sign it and return it to the City for execution by the City Manager or his/her designee. The General Planning Consultant shall assist in the planning, technical, managerial and administrative efforts related to transportation studies and/or other planning-related activities of the City of Miami Beach to include but not be limited to the following activities. 1. Short and Long Range Transportation Planning a. Conduct planning and feasibility studies for bicycle, pedestrian, transit, traffic management and other projects, as directed. b. Conduct transportation corridor studies along arterials and collectors within the City of Miami Beach, with the purpose of identifying mobility improvements and develop a capital plan to facilitate efficient transportation movements of goods and services. c. Review the technical traffic impact studies submitted by land developers for proposed projects in Miami Beach, and provide prompt input to the Administration on accuracy of information provided in the studies. d. Develop demand or market forecasts, including utilizing transportation forecasting models. e. Prepare project layouts and capital cost estimates necessary to support planning studies. f. Evaluate transit operating scenarios utilizing operational models and other tools. g. Develop cost estimates for implementation, operations and maintenance. h. Conduct daily and peak hour turning movement counts for vehicular traffic as well as for bicycles and pedestrians. These counts can be either manual or automated. In addition, most of the above-mentioned studies will require the staff resources, degree of specialization, and equipment 29 EXHIBIT A Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-In Sheet IMIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 9, 2017 TITLE: RPO-2017.126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS' rte,,_ Natalia Delgado Procurement CMB 305-673-7000 nataliadelgado@mtamtheachfl.gov Ext. 6263 Q\ xnrr"q and and ' ct\t(s i. M 11, c 7A \il ± . X11 M71 Tindall OIMQE 1 ?oxasrs. ^' and iv,aA� c _ __ cin deAcioez. "Lobo, NeAter' 1>\lygnowd . Nam . n ,,,,,r0 kayo YiLimoikitssoe,o MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 9, 2017 TITLE: RFQ-2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN 'AS NEEDED BASIS' 5� a _ ` -- jPLEe1EPRLgy Y F •} :p ,SAIL . . `, - -,5 -42-241. !A/ a # en str'.. 03 �a /1T.a.+--% ea c/, .4�j.foams 77�1 /ere, I/)/!sh..er,..vGruhic;oJ r G4ao jste( Terrey-Dez Ci'7 sb �La �17,ac as-rrs r000 rw531 -.IttLeANwv t" .1c6 e�� K,a\•cw aa.� &ilNc .16mte@k9f N,. Col-t yr � eove fsd,-t4Sr.- 'JEXt-rnrELlA Ltu i U w 0. Ca. wan(re emh C 57 e/t(yv(17;4.6�o, 3aS .7�6 3L TsSteiMoitt- niE Gon2n\ez lel (OQCAa4 • COM J aa6-9525 SA'L y1/44 4,4 FA'+SAS.. hw q+J p K�wl.E4^ loPa tn.e ''or-sIr Ea r^\ ccMLE?-ftoMJ -`sy_ EA,thoNS e'R-rnJ. �JItrPIUrJswin r,r-vlra•,.r.w 53j s1 $ CReC(of &01 819" /°(601$/4 7$6 Self C.67*t ccc)gr ,J fine coil TrY11 JeciF &misaed atm&(5,250 �U zer, V �f'Ci�aszv7P Ju.eLcFwQ141,..en.t in tnn.i • <^"" d 2 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 9, 2017 TITLE: RFQ-2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANTSERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" R-i-im z �.: _.;-5.7 II.A 3RESS n 444 rr ,i 94 x J't-'f _ igPogq FTE 3a5V63-Mc :w C/ann0s FTE 1hc• nel- csF (07 puuf� VPa4Q4 rra- - rc ctclog en Wc.iYG7 133-2729 �tic Gza'nleJewbe'1 ( )-31, 61c- '& 81;e acricpts /,e- 9 - a Gas-7573 gced 1 RE VA A M * 5 -t\ o (otjatc 0 C.r(Af an' 205 r'o7tt " " � aka toune.e, w.sP/ pQ JUMewesAwo ld , cor 305 PSyNZIZ 3 'IVIIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 9, 2017 TITLE: REG-2017.126-KB GENERALTRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" -x !-L-71;;; .;M1A IE r:•a sCObffihh'Y'h r I „�1S`kE ffR4\TFc.4 E. : r x S. i--I '.:. �raa �ot�a� k` e A a SLAG q �49X. a10� M1 bpo fid\ @ ma, KaAaun Ci A-77.wµ4)" 3 D5— -G(2Hufoci,nec . c�n TY L� Tyke.n&+o o.1 3o305" 341 M Cnksev _ V -t- na.eril_'Scine itn Com 1z1 J0r6e. {-y • LeFez . W . Cock betr e3oS'So39F73 -7 Lo pez Lackner , cows. _)Act 561-warn.rutSTK-INS � 3C9-51y-334. -- 344t,4617.he.{tlar(Aw.1ry_in 55l06 al, caws a 41,6?> H rr77YA�� k1�m @ lirf%• 34 222 NY2R,Jco son* �+Jo 1`-q.AtPr yes et—N6. 1613 . 2.51. r -F5c,rt,ce44egli�iP)'ftr<�'WDlktnry 1111 dZGF'-e-e-Jcz !JS' 4 ss- sGl� ��a�-% y Par-f a-f-- TinAatc kvc-r Toth 6 G G7t- O&G 1 G a,is) co-A, Doi do (�o iaM becl hFl lob \41(1511,k aM0 I 1 1 4 • MIAMI BEACH Procurement Deportment,1755 Meridian Avenue,3"Floor, Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachf.gov,305-673-7490 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" June 5, 2017 • This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Friday, July 7. 2017 at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3'4 Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. • • II, ATTACHMENTS: • Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-In Sheet A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadoOmiamlbeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000, ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachf.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, Ale De ' rement Director 1 ADDENDUM N0.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017429-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED BASIS" REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIO\S ( RFQ) GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" 2017-126-KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: APRIL 28, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: JUNE 12, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: MIAMIBEACH Natalia Delgado, Contracting Officer I PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1 755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 I www.miamibeachfl.gov m ;�I�.r1^' BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS &GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B °NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS &SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 28 APPENDIX F INSURANCE.REQUIREMENTS 30 APPENDIX G SAMPLE CONTRACT 32 FCD 20'7-126-KB 2 4.J:A BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Quahfcauons(RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the°City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications(the°proposal")to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s)(the°contractor[sj")if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase fwww.oubiicourchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this REQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2.PURPOSE. By means of this RFQ, the City seeks to contract with consultants to provide professional services transportation planning, traffic engineering, and related services on an"as needed'basis. 'As needed' basis means that each firm awarded a contract pursuant to this RFQ will be placed on a list where the City may call upon it to perform professional projects, as assigned by the City Administration.As the need for services arise, fins will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select several firms under this RFQ, which will be contacted on an as-needed basis. The ability to have a rotating list of firms available to provide these services for Transportation Department would enable the City to effectively and efficiently manage these projects. Each proposed contract shall be for a three (3) year contract term,with two(2)one year renewal options at the Citys option. The Consultant shall provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach specializing in planning for transportation and livability. Suggested specializations include but are not limited to: general transportation planning, smart growth,livable cities,complete streets,integration of transportation and urban design, economic and financial analysis, transit planning, bicycle and pedestrian planning,station area planning, and traffic engineering. The City of Miami Beach seeks multidisciplinary consultant teams to provide technical expertise and logistical support to its Transportation Department. Emphasis will be on the comprehensive implementation of selected projects primarily from the City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan and the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan, which were adopted by the City of Miami Beach City Commission and are located on the City of Miami Beach website (http:llwww.miamibeachfl.gov/transportations). These items were specifically developed to implement Key Intended Outcomes adopted by the City of Miami Beach City Commission. Continued on the following page. RFQ 2017125-KB 3 J ?;1BEACH The modal prioritization strategy below was adopted by Resolution of the City Commission as a guide during the planning process conducted during the City's Transportation Master Plan. Mode share goals for 2035 were developed based on the recommended projects identified in the Transportation Master Plan. UNDERSTANDING MODE SHARE 0ti;i1 coo 0 0 i7117M3 TXT TV r..+d' V.t'f.Tt3 1 2 3 vnr CITY M MIAMI-OAOE COUNTY in icovrras 4ocE Emmy The Goals below were developed to move toward this mode share and to guide project selection during the Transportation Master Planning process: Goal 1: Prioritize the people, the pedestrians. Goal 2: Provide reliable,convenient, and consistent transit service and infrastructure. Goal 3: Develop a safe, connected, and consistent bicycle network throughout the entire City. Goal 4: Provide accessible and convenient off-street parking facilities. Goal 5: Ensure most, if not all, planned developments are within all areas of the City are in concurrence with the expected capacity levels and the multi-modal vision for the transportation network. Goal 6: Plan for the efficient freight mobility and deliver of goods within the City. From these efforts Priority 1 (short term), Priority 2(medium term), and Priority 3(long term) projects were identified to meet the Transportation Department's goals and Key intended Outcomes. The short term projects are based on an assessment of needs and the potential for rapid deployment. The mid- and long- range planning phases are designed to further shape the City by upgrading transit corridors,mobility and accessibility throughout the City. An additional and very important component of transit planning and implementing regionally significant transit projects is the coordination of land use decisions, which include the focusing of mixed-use development into key locations throughout the region and the promotion of transit, pedestrian, bicycle and auto accessibility. To accommodate these needs, a broad,interdisciplinary team is required. In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the 'Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act', the City may enter into a "continuing contract' for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed$2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed$200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule )ti-CD 20'/-1 26-KB 4 m '.11 =!;', BEACH with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. This RFP is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes,the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued April 28, 2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting May 9, 2017 at 1:00PM (EST) Deadline for Receipt of Questions June 2,2017 at 5:00PM(EST) Responses Due June 12, 2017 at 3:00PM(EST) Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below Procurement Contact Telephone. Email. NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 NATALIADELGADO e,MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV dditionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranadoffmiamibeachfl qor or via facsimile. 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISITIS). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s)may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFP Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3RD Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow I2FO 20'/-1 26-K6 5 m ' ;`. IBEACH these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or became familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the Citys Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: h ttp:/iweb.mi a mi beachfl.govlorocu rementfscroll.asox?id=23510 CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2436 PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2.371 DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS. CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-4B5 3 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES. CITY CODE SECTIONS 2481 THROUGH 2406 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2487 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2488 REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2407 THROUGH 2-413 PREFERENCE FOR FLOP DA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-330 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. RFQ 201/-125-KB 6 ':' Ir'i`s` BEACH 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation,disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their responses,in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics('Code)and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters(five(5)days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures,as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. NOT USED. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374,the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent(5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this REQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service,then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. RFQ 201/-I 26-KB 7 m '11.=t,' BEACH 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Managers recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City,or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Resection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120) calendar days after proposal opening date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY, Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23.COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposers employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic REQ 201/-126-Kb BEACH substance substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposes history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposers responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 26.TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27, MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFO. Failure to do so will be at the Proposes risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS 8 ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its kers, employees, contractors, and/or agents,from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for,o on account of, any copyrighted, patented,or unpatented invention, process,or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the Citys vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations,or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the .&0 20 /-126-KB q m ';' HL BEACH Proposer, or its officers,employees, contractors, and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status,and age or disability. 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance(experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City,including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposers facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer,including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances,the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or hismer or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE.When the successful Proposer(s)is in agreement,other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. RFC) 201 /-126-'Cb 10 1 1 -,'.' BEACH 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The Proposes proposal in response to the solicitation. 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is eadier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43. OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. FC,1 201/-1 26-KB I I m ",,' BEACH 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be Included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ('items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work.When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendorjs), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases,the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract,to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2017-126-KB 12 m BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopen d. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.2.1 Provide a comprehensive summary of the experience and qualifications of the individual(s) who are proposed to serve as the Project Manager and Task Leaders for this Project. 2.2.2 Team Experience.Personnel and consultants specializations listed below are desirable: RFC) 2017-126-K3 13 ;' BEACH 1. Transportation Planning 2. Smart growth 3. Livable cities 4. Complete streets 5. Integration of transportation and land use 6. Economic and financial analysis 7. Transit planning 8. Bicycle and pedestrian planning 9. Urban design 10. Station area planning 11. Traffic engineering 2.2.2 Evidence of Prior Working Experience. Submit evidence that the proposed team has successfully collaborated on prior projects. For each project, submit project name, bdef description of project, date of completion, owner's representative, and owner's representative contact information. Include Projects which illustrate experience within the Miami Beach and/or coastal communities. 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https:/Is u ool ie roo rta I.dnb.c om/webapo/wcs/stores/se ry let/S u p pl i erPortal?store Id=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal •rocess, contact Dun &Bradstreet at 800.424-2495. Approach and Methodology Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the required scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, strategies for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Include the percent of time the Project Manager and Task Leaders will be available to provide the require scope of services to the City. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). KFC) 20:/-126-KB 14 m .' 1 BEACH SECTION SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the REP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Procurement Department. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received, with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1-Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications,including Financial Capability 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City within the last three (3)years from the due date for proposal. See 5 Section 4 below. 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three(3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,004000 0 RFC 2017-126-KS IS m ' 'J L BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Procurement Department. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 BO Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member l Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 . Committee Total 101 100 84 Member Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 , Member2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 a Final Ranking' 1 2 3 Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission,which may be different than final ranking results. FQ 20'7-126-K6 16 APPENDIX A m MIAMI BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No. 2017- 126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFC 2017-126-KB 17 So'iolabon No Saiotatoo Tide- RFC/2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN'AS NEEDED BASIS" Procurement Cintas ra. Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE &REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME. No of Years in Business: Noel Years in Business Locally OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS. FIRM PR:MlRY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS):: CITY STATE ZIP 000E. TELEPHONE NO.. TOLL FREE NO. FM NO FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY- SIAM: IT-STATE: ZIP CODE. PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT. ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO. ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO ACCOUNT REP EMAIL. FEDERAL TM IDENTIFICATION NO': - -- - -- - - The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s).including but not limited to:any firm or prindpal information, applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. *C3 20-/-I 26Kti 18 1. Veteran Owned Business.is Pro oser claiminga veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director.agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director, agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3 References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solidtation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required. 1) Finn Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to norr±9trformance by,any public sector agency? YES � NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES,'Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein.including disqualification of their Proposals.in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adapt a Code of Business Ethics ('Code') and submit that Code to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest. lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamiteadtgov/procurementr. RrQ 20 I 7.1 26-KB 19 7 Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below. • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be 511.28thr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may. by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale,issued by the U.S.DeparMent of Labors Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution.elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year,if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal,under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive, and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www miamibeachd.govlprocuremenU. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks.the Equal Benefits or Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance apples to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach.Florida;and the Contractors employees located in the United States,but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the other section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Fin Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Pravkle Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Managers decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachltgovlprocurementf. : r-U 2011/-126-KH 20 9 Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal. proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity:may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 267017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document.Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Nom0iscrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex.intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age ordisabilily SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beath City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to Nath Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1,2016,the ply shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competve solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written polides,practices,and standards that are consistent with the dty's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Cede. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City *II strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the Citys e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.can. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Inial to Cmfirm Initial to Confine Maul to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum I Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. 1F, 201/-126-K1i 21 The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the'City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptaplity of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the redpent to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations.and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer.is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.My Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions.or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as. if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Govemment-in-theSunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shalt become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000 00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City In the event of any differences in language between this Disdosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and consbved in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. • FQ 2017-126-KB 22 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto. and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement cf Qualifications Certification. Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name el Proposer Aumonzed Representative. Tine of Proposer Authorizes Representative. sgoa ire or Proposer's Authoozed Representative Dare: State of FLORIDA I On this_day of 20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires'. &Cd 201/-126-KB 23 APPENDIX B MIAM BEACH " No Bid " Form RFQ No. 2017- 126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Wita unporfont fa those vendrs owho have received notification of «. . soRcfiafiurt buf have decided not to respond to complete and submit ttie attached "Statement of No Bid."The "Statement of No Bid" provides M City with information on taw to improve the solicitation process. Fc*xe to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future soficitafons by the City_ RFQ 2017-126-KB 24 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal _Insufficient time to respond _Specifications unclear or too restrictive _Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements _Unable to meet insurance requirements _Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal Q_r this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: NATALIA DELGADO STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2017-126-KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 Bra 231/-126-KB 25 APPENDIX C m M AMI BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications RFQ No. 2017- 126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFC) 2,Y 7-126-KB 26 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit,with its proposal,the required submittal(s)documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. PRIME PROPOSER: 1. The Prime Proposer (Engineering Firm) shall hold a "Certificate of Authorization' by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. 2. The Prime Proposer shall submit no less than five (5) projects completed within the last ten (10) years completed exemplifying experience planning, technical, managerial and administrative efforts related to transportation studies and/or other planning-related activities. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, start and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email), volume of contract, prime proposer's role in project. PROJECT MANAGER: 3. The Prime Proposer shall identify a Project Manager which shall submit no less than three (3) projects completed within the last ten (10) years completed exemplifying experience and capacity in performing transportation planning and related professional services Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, start and completion dates, project contact information (phone and email), volume of contract, prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. The City of Miami Beach seeks multidisciplinary consultant teams to provide technical expertise and logistical support to its Transportation Department. Emphasis will be on the comprehensive implementation of selected projects primarily from the City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan and the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan, which were adopted by the City of Miami Beach City Commission and are located on the City of Miami Beach website (http://www.miamibeachfl.govltransportationl). These items were specifically developed to implement Key Intended Outcomes adopted by the City of Miami Beach City Commission. The General Planning Consultant shall assist in the planning, technical, managerial and administrative efforts related to transportation studies and/or other planning-related activities of the City of Miami Beach to include but not be limited to the following activities. 1. Short and Long Range Transportation Planning a. Conduct planning and feasibility studies for bicycle, pedestrian, transit, traffic management and other projects,as directed. b. Conduct transportation corridor studies along arterials and collectors within the City of Miami Beach, with the purpose of identifying mobility improvements and develop a capital plan to facilitate efficient transportation movements of goods and services. c. Review the technical traffic impact studies submitted by land developers for proposed projects in Miami Beach, and provide prompt input to the Administration on accuracy of information provided in the studies. d. Develop demand or market forecasts, including utilizing transportation forecasting models. RFQ 20 7-126-KB 27 e. Prepare project layouts and capital cost estimates necessary to support planning studies. f. Evaluate transit operating scenarios utilizing operational models and other tools. g. Develop cost estimates for implementation,operations and maintenance. h. Conduct daily and peak hour turning movement counts for vehicular traffic as well as for bicycles and pedestrians. These counts can be either manual or automated. In addition, most of the above-mentioned studies will require the staff resources,degree of specialization, and equipment availability that can be provided only by consulting firms. Tasks require demonstrated experience in current Complete Streets. Smart Growth, multimodal transportation planning,and livability practices. Experience in the integration of transportation and land use is critical to the success of these studies. 2. Transit Operations Planning The City may require that the Consultant provide transit operations plans related to existing and future Trolley service. This may include conducting transit feasibility studies, to include modifications to existing trolley operations, potential new route alignments and ridership projections. 3. Facilities Planning and Development Plan and develop transportation related facilities for the City of Miami Beach. 4. Public Participation The Consultant will establish and implement comprehensive public participation programs and outreach activities for planning studies and projects that meet the requirements of federal, state,regional and local processes. Consultant team should be knowledgeable in: a. Issues affecting urban development/redevelopment; b. Issues affecting environmentally sensitive environments with significant land use constraints; c. Stakeholder identification and communication; d. Meeting facilitation, e. Group decision making processes; f Establishing effective working relationships with community and team members, and g. Executing sucrassful media strategies, products and events. 5. Financial Planning and Analysis The Consultant will support City of Miami Beach projects by providing financial planning and analysis, as requested. Tasks may include but not be limited to: RFQ20,7- 26-KB 28 a. Market and Development Analysis - national experience in: economics, real estate development (as a successful real estate developer or expertise in analyzing projects that were constructed); station area/transit real estate development/financial analysis; economic and fiscal impact; economic (re)development; and new transit system development and/or evaluation; b. Financial Feasibility Studies; c. Funding Source Identification (new and existing) for the City of Miami Beach program of projects; d. Project Budget Estimates; e. Project Expenditure forecasts; and f. Preparation of the required reports for these processes,if requested. 6. Environmental Sustainability Analysis The City of Miami Beach is a leader in area of environmental sustainability, and the City's adopted transportation mode share priorities support its environmental goals. The Consulting team should have experience in incorporating environmental best practices into transportation studies and projects. Experience in incorporating environmental performance measures into short and long range transportation plans and projects would also be helpful. 7. Transit Intermodal Facility Development, compliant with the provisions for such facilities as described in the Transportation Element of the City's 2025 Comprehensive Plan. The Consultant will work with City of Miami Beach staff and stakeholders to determine appropriate measures for implementing intermodal hubs. The Consultant will inventory and evaluate implementing tools and strategies used in other cities with similar transit levels of services and provide recommendations to the City of Miami Beach. B. Urban Design The Consultant should be familiar with current planning issues and regulations in South Florida, with experience in transit-oriented development planning. The Consultant should also have experience working with community and agency stakeholders to design high quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that may include but not be limited to shared use paths, greenways, beach walks, dedicated bicycle lanes, and transit facilities. 9. Transit Oriented Development. Experience developing and implementing guidelines that emphasize pedestrian-scale development and transit and non-motorized-accessible site plans. 10. Project Control and Management It is expected that the Consultants project management team will bring the following experience and skills in the following areas of project control and management: RFQ 2017-126-KB 29 a. Effective work planning,monthly progress reporting,and invoicing; b. Schedule control,time management, monitoring, and reporting; c. Budgeting control, monitoring,and reporting; d. Quality control; e. Establish teamwork within consulting team, the City of Miami Beach, other consultants and stakeholders; and f. Conduct regulady scheduled project meetings with City of Miami Beach and relevant study committees and prepare and distribute project-meeting minutes to all participating stakeholders; RFQ 2017. 26-KB 30 APPENDIX D Si MIAMI BEACH Special Conditions RFQ No. 2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach. Florida 33139 RFO 2017-126KB 31 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. Three (3) years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW.Two (2) additional one(1)year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Not Applicable. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8. SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested. either through a separate agreement, work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. 13. CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER. A change in the Consultant's project manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the City project manager). 14. SUB-CONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub- consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 15. NEGOTIATIONS. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services, deliverables and cost of services. P10 2017126-KB 32 APPENDIX E m M AMI BEACH Insurance Requirements RFQ No. 2017- 126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFC 2017-126-KB 33 MIAMI BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels sof insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employees Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability(occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises) Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in'insurance requirements'of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5, The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. _6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 _Fire Legal Liability $ .00 _Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9 The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured.Any and all claim payments made from self•insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. 12rQ 201/-126-KB 34 APPENDIX F P_-_ MIAMI BEACH Sample Contract RFQ No. 2017- 126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 *u 201/126-KB 35 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-126-KB DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. 2017- FQ 201/126-KB 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 38 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 43 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 47 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 49 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 49 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 50 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 51 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANTS ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 52 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 52 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 52 ARTICLE II. INSURANCE 54 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 54 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 55 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 55 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 55 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 56 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 60 SCHEDULE B 62 SCHEDULE C 64 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A 65 ATTACHMENT B 66 ATTACHMENT C 67 1F020'/-I 26-KS 37 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED BASIS" This Agreement made and entered into this day of . 20 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach. Florida. 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and , a corporation having its principal office at (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on , the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2017-126-KB for GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on , the City Commission approved Resolution No._ , respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option. and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. *O 201/-12&K 38 APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order, Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s)concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional FQ 2017-12&KB 39 has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or"engineer of record"for the Project.When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "C", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Fbrida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City(as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s) for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design-builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract F0 201/-126-K8 43 Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: 'Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance- oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design-build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents' means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather (except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs, The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. Project Scope: The Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described FQ 20'7.1 26-KB 41 in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrate?' shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project), PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFC), together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultants proposal in response to the RFC) is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order Schedule B—Consultant Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: 'Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultants estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. RFQ 20 /-i 26-KB 42 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws)to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule 'A' hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: e • 43 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment(i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultants request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order(including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City RrQ 2017-125-K8 44 caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense. re- perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non- conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services CO for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term 'timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager(as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(i.e.the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the FQ 2017-126-KB 45 City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work. services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order. Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultants reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANTS OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. SFO 2017-126-KB 46 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, kl-U 201/-126-KB 47 information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any Subconsultants(and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this RFO 2017-126-KB 48 Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000,00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents, 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator(which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a °Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any)with a "Not to Exceed"amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets(and,for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. RFO 2017-126-KB 49 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts(except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys 8 Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are"true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement' Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to,the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its kFQ 20 /-I26-KB 52 Subconsultants). Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum"or"Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule 'B." attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark- uR shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s)or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records ,(I-(,) YO V-I 26-KB 51 hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultants office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes. correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty(30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing. In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the hnFQ 201/-126-K3 52 appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or(3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty(30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. k'.-C,1 201/-12&K3 53 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services: (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator: (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents(for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30)days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save xEO 201/-1 '25-KN 54 harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant wiII constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement,with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultants"not to exceed"fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s)actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 201/126-Kb 55 All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Attn: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail. return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant. City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of k-C 201 /-1 26-Kd 56 Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover)the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Proiect Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, andior ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. R70 2017-126-KB 57 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. RFC 201/-126-KB 58 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest CONSULTANT: Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print Name Print Name *0 20'/126-KB 59 SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND RFO 2017-126-Kb 60 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. _ for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS"(RFO 2017-126-KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date KFO 201/-126-KB 61 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services ' $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX Bidding and Award Services $XXXXXXXX Construction Administration" $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance'" $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note": Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for $XXXXXX, per month,for the duration required to complete the Project. Note': The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. FQ 2017-126-KB 62 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFC 201/-126-KB 63 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS RFQ 2017-126-KB 64 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM FC) 2017-126-KB 65 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) KEG 20I/-126-K8 66 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANTS RESPONSE TO THE RFQ =Q 201/-126-KB 67 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 41 GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING and TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES on an "AS NEEDED BASIS" 2017- 126-KB ,. 4111/44ir' , ..Silli 1 . - --":111V)/11fly1J-4; ". '" 014...:ii. , .....04 -----1 4011Pw— f ' �—` ` ..l• �r•1 + j1+ � � � `tr t ( '' r z , t .,:`.',P:i lit-1 _ 1 ' i I. * -_ ••iT': I�fTT ___,...a. t !iiii.i.tal 7, '''. A • illk Jralb,A;.1 alb) ,-. '_A City of B lipi.,2_, )4 ie.,. 1 1 A :II �412\ I si \Mill# 'Mil IIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL- 1111611111 41111/1111111111 Submitted to Submitted from City of Miami Beach H.W. Lochner, Inc. Natalia Delgado, Contracting Officer 8750 NW 36th Street, Suite 360 Procurement Department Miami, FL 33617 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor 305.503.9873 I www.hwlochner.com Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 I www.miamibeachfl.gov TAB 1 : COVER LETTER & MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS City of MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER H.W Lochner,Inc. 8750 NW 36'Street Suite 360 July 14. 2017 Miami,FL 33178 City of Miami Beach T 305.503.9873 Natalia Delgado,Contracting Officer F 305.503.9882 Procurement Department hwlochne'.com 1755 Meridian Avenue. 3rd Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7490 RE: Request For Qualifications (RFQ)2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN "AS NEEDED BASIS" Dear Selection Committee: H.W. Lochner. Inc. (LOCHNER)is excited to submit our qualifications to provide General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an"as-needed"basis for the prestigious City of Miami Beach. Lochner was founded in 1944 and is a pioneer in the field of transportation,planning and design.Lochner is passionate about developing"Transportation Solutions that Improve Communities"...for the People.Lochner is a full-service multidiscipline firm with more than 550 professionals who collaborate to deliver all modes of innovative.creative,state-of- the-art,cost-effective transportation solutions in transportation planning,traffic engineering.roadway design.rail and transit. structures,environmental,aviation,construction,and alternative delivery. Lochner specializes in planning for transportation and livability,with the technical expertise to provide a reliable, convenient,safe,and connected multi-modal network throughout the entire Beach.Our local office,based in Doral,Florida. will quickly provide the needed logistical support to the City of Miami Beach's Transportation Department at a moments notice.Also. as a standard practice. Lochner does not provide services for private developers in municipalities we represent,so the Beach can be comfortable that Lochner can be reliable and always has their best interest in mind.with no conflicts of interest. Edwin Mojena,PE will serve as the Principal-in-Charge of this contract and James E.Spinks III, PE,PTOE,a highly regarded Project Manager throughout Miami-Dade County,will be the Project Manager and the direct contact for you. James is a proven and effective communicator.and has an established reputation as a leader in transportation planning and traffic engineering with provide proven experience in developing concepts that enhance transportation and quality of life. James has applied for 25 mph speed limit designations for multiple Miami-Dade cites,developed innovative citywide traffic calming master plans for multiple municipalities with the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW)that contained traffic circles.speed tables,and complete street concepts that included lane repurpcsing and lane width reductions,wide sidewalks. mid-block crosswalks,landscaping,bike lanes,bulb-outs,high-emphasis intersection crosswalks, and operational and safety improvements at intersections. In addition to municipal projects,James recently served as the Project Manager to the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization(TPO).where he managed the Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan,the 2015 and 2016 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Plans,and the Bike Friendly Miami-Dade Plan. To fulfill the City's key intended outcomes in the Strategic Plan and the goals of both the City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan and the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan, Lochner developed a broad,interdisciplinary team of capable and experienced firms with established relationships,including Bermello,Ajamil&Partners,Cambridge Systematics, Metric Engineering. PLUSURBIA, Eland Engineering, Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants.Boothe Transit Consulting, 1 LOCHNER MAGBE Consulting Services,ACE Public Relations Group, Ecostrata Services,Gridics, M.G.Vera and Associates,Tierra South Florida.Walker Parking Consultants. WTL+a,Quality Counts,and CloudParc. The Lochner Team key personnel and subconsultants were selected based on their proven track record of completing similar projects and strong transportation planning and traffic engineering technical expertise. I will serve as the Project Manager for this contract, and will be the single point of contact with the City. I will be supported by a team of well-qualified engineers. planners and technicians who all have the availability and ability to provide superior services that will fully support the Beach.As Lochner's Associate Vice President and Lead Transportation Engineer, I have experience managing many transportation planning.traffic engineering and design projects and bring the diversity of expertise required of such an assignment. I understand the demands of municipal contracts and will be responsible for ensuring that the Beach's needs are met on a daily basis. My contact information is: James Spinks III,PE, PTOE 8750 NW 36th Street, Suite 360 Miami,FL 33178 The Lochner Team is excited about the opportunity to respond to this Request for Qualifications. If given the opportunity,we have the experience.the desire and the dedication to meet the needs of the City of Miami Beach.The Lochner Team is fully committed to assigning the necessary manpower.expertise,and attentiveness to ensure that the Beach fulfills its goals and Vvsion. Sincerely, H.W.Loch r, Inc. V v/P James Spinks III, PE,PT crE Associate Vice President/Lead Transportation Engineer 2 General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineerin• Consultant Services on an "As Needed Basis" LOC H N E R 2017-126-KB 1.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TAB 1 : COVER LETTER & MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 1 .1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 - 3 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT 4 - 22 (APPENDIX A) 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 23 - 143 TAB 2: EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM 1 - 11 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM 12 - 175 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY 176 TAB 3: APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 1 - 11 3 Solicitation No: Solidtation Title: RFQ 2017-126-KB GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ON AN"AS NEEDED BASIS" Procurement Contact: Tel' Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME NM.Lochner,Inc. No of Years in Business. y3 No of Years in Business Locally. South Florida-14 Miami-Dade-5 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS'. FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS). 225 W Washington Street,12th Floor CITY. Chicago STATE: IL ZIP CODE. 60606 TELEPHONE NO. 312-372-3011 TOLL FREE NO 800.353 3011 FAX NO 312-372-5974 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS' 8750 NW 36th Street.Suite 360 CITY Miami STATE. FL ZIP CODE: 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT. James Spinks III.PE.PTOE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO: 305.503 9873 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: 800.39-3011 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL jspinks@hwlochner.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.. 362338811 • The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFO 201/-126-KB 4 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claimina veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%) percent or mare in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title.3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such noncompliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachil.govlprocuremenU. RFQ 2017-126-KB 5 7. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as same may be amended from time to time, Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be 411.28/hr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft.Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal,under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive. and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines,as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance. as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfi.govlprocuremenU. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners,When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO c. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.govlprocuremenU. dFC) 201A1 26-Kb 6 9 Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal. proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor. supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 207 01 7 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016.3990,the City shalt not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation.marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11 Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016.29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement.Beginning on December 1,2016,the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document. Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. [rim!to Confirm Inial to Confirm Initial10 Confirm Race t RemIRI Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 -tet Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RrQ 2017126-KB 7 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the'City')for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation.either before or after issuance of an award.shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications. may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own nsk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation, express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy, or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process.or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer. is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors, omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications. and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete.to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 201/-126-KB 8 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal: proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authonzed Representative Tie of Proposer's Authorized Representative Edwin Mojena Vice Prescent Signature of Proposer's Authonzed Represen.trve: Date j-_-----) July 12.2017 I State of FLORIDA ) On this_day of July ,2017,personally ) appeared before me Edwin Mo;ena who County of Miami—Dade ) stated that (s)he is the Vice President Of Lochner , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board di ectors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Bef Notary Pu ' r the State of Florida My Commission Expires: 10/27/2018 • s.4•'"tiF. MAYEUN NUNEZ • '`•' My COMMISSION R FF936333 '-fr �r.:`• EXPIRES October 27 2018 4!.. ,10713it1-0 X51 NoyrypWnr,u LOrw FQ 2017-126-KB 9 Tab 1 I Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements LOC H N E R CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT (APPENDIX A) 3. References & Past Performance SR 907(Alton Road) Reconstruction, 43rd Street to East of Allison Road Florida Department of Transportation, District 6 Auraliz Benitez, PE Project Manager 1000 NW 111 Ave, Miami, FL 33172 305-470-5100 Auraliz.Benitez@dot.state.fl.us State Route 907(Alton Road)is a four-lane divided highway that runs north—south along Miami Beach's Biscayne Bay coast line.The asphalt pavement on the 2.8-mile stretch from 43rd Street to east of Allison Road is exhibiting substantial deterioration, in large part because the current roadway drainage system was designed when the sea levels in Biscayne Bay were lower than those prevailing today;water is therefore not draining efficiently from the site. Lochner is leading the design for a Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)project that will reconstruct the roadway and,for the first time in Florida, install an entirely new roadway drainage system specifically designed to address rising sea levels. Lochner's design for this critical new drainage system is exclusively pump based,with no gravity drainage elements. Lochner's roadway design plans reconstruct the asphalt pavement across all four travel lanes,widen the existing parking lanes along most of the project to 8 feet,and stripe for active transportation along the full project length. Lochner is designing all necessary improvements to sidewalks, curb ramps,and pedestrian signals to comply with current ADA requirements, as well as various upgrades to the roadway lighting and traffic signals along the project to meet FDOT's new design standards. Landscaping and irrigation plans for the roadway median will also be provided. Alton Road is a main thoroughfare for commuters from North Beach, particularly for access to Highway A1A and Mount Sinai hospital.Lochner will develop a detailed construction phasing and maintenance-of-traffic plan for this project in close coordination with the designers of other Miami Beach construction projects, regional and local event organizers, uSinai and residential will include h phased closuremaintained.lanes of traffic sidewalks and an approved detour schedule.Access to and busisdriveways willalso be Lochner will also assist in the development of bilingual(English and Spanish)project information for distribution to affected stakeholders, particularly residents and business owners located along the route. SR 968(Flagler Street) Rehabilitation, West of 69th Avenue to West of SR 9 Florida Department of Transportation, District 6 Fabiana Gonzalez, PE Project Manager 1000 NW 111 Ave, Miami, FL 33172 305-470-5100 fabiana.gonzalez@dot.state.fl.us Flagler Street(SR 968)is an urban minor arterial that runs through Miami and a small portion of Coral Gables. Lochner is preparing plans, specifications,and estimates for a 3R(resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation)project on a 4.3-mile section of the roadway,west of 69th Avenue to west of SR 9.The roadway throughout this section is a four-lane, median-divided facility with curb and gutter and sidewalks on both sides. 2017-126-KB 110 Tab 1 I Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER Lochner's design plans will resurface all four travel lanes with asphalt pavement.The design will also address a number of ADA and access management issues:the closure of 11 unused driveways,the addition of 19 pedestrian refuge islands, and the upgrade of almost all curb ramps along the project length to meet current ADA requirements. Because of right of way restrictions, Lochner will move several of the curb ramps to the side streets. Lochner's construction and maintenance-of-traffic plans will minimize traffic disruption on this high-volume route by restricting most construction work to evening and nighttime hours.A CSX Railroad crossing is located immediately west of the project; Lochner will coordinate with the railroad regarding construction work and will extend the limits of the maintenance-of-traffic plans beyond the project bounds to incorporate signage before the crossing. SR5_Biscayne Blvd Pedestrian Crosswalks - MiMo Project- Seven Crossing Florida Department of Transportation, District 6 Hong Benitez, PE Project Manager 1000 NW 111 Ave, Miami, FL 33172 305-470-5100 hong.benitez@dot.state.fl.us Flagler Street(SR 968)is an urban minor arterial that runs through Miami and a small portion of Coral Gables. Lochner is preparing plans, specifications, and estimates for a 3R (resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation)project on a 4.3-mile section of the roadway,west of 69th Avenue to west of SR 9.The roadway throughout this section is a four-lane, median-divided facility with curb and gutter and sidewalks on both sides. Lochner's design plans will resurface all four travel lanes with asphalt pavement.The design will also address a number of ADA and access management issues:the closure of 11 unused driveways, the addition of 19 pedestrian refuge islands,and the upgrade of almost all curb ramps along the project length to meet current ADA requirements. Because of right of way restrictions, Lochner will move several of the curb ramps to the side streets. Lochner's construction and maintenance-of-traffic plans will minimize traffic disruption on this high-volume route by restricting most construction work to evening and nighttime hours.A CSX Railroad crossing is located immediately west of the project; Lochner will coordinate with the railroad regarding construction work and will extend the limits of the maintenance-of-traffic plans beyond the project bounds to incorporate signage before the crossing. Edwin Mojena, along with project team members from FDOT, received the Prudential Productivity Award for their efforts on the Biscayne Boulevard Pedestrian Crosswalk and Safety Project.The Prudential Productivity Awards program annually honors Florida state employees who strive to enhance the delivery of state services by developing and implementing innovative and cost-efficient improvements throughout Florida. Since 1989,more than 16,000 nominations have been received, and award winners have created over$9.2 billion in cost savings or efficiency gains for Florida taxpayers and businesses.This project not only increased pedestrian safety, but also created more than $64K in overall cost savings for Florida! SR 70(Okeechobee Road)and Jenkins Road Intersection Improvements Florida Department of Transportation, District 4 Bing Wang, PE Project Manager 3400 W Commercial Blvd, Fort Lauderdale , FL 33309 954-777-4406 bing.wang@dot.state.fl.us Lochner is providing design services to implement the improvements recommended in the 1-95(SR 9)and SR 70(Okeechobee Road)Interchange Operational Analysis Report to increase level of service at the signalized intersection of SR 70 and Jenkins Road. Lochner's design includes intersection widening to provide four through 2017-126-KB 111 Tab 1 I Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER lanes, a right-turn lane in both travel directions on SR 70, dual left-turn lanes eastbound on SR 70, and a single left- turn lane westbound on SR 70.Jenkins Road will be widened to incorporate two through lanes with a shared right- turn lane and dual left-turn lanes in both the northbound and southbound directions. Lochner's stormwater/drainage design activities include the completion of a pond siting evaluation and the integration of a joint-use pond for drainage purposes. Lochner is also responsible for assessing and developing the project's right of way needs, including the provision of expert witness services, if required,during the right of way acquisition and condemnation phase. 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions No one person with H.W. Lochner, Inc. has controlling financial interest as defined in the solicitation. H.W. Lochner, Inc., nor any subconsultant partners have contributed indirectly or directly to the campaign of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics Lochner's Code of Business Ethics follows. 2017-126-KB 112 600.0 Introduction to Code of Conduct & Ethics Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy It is Lochner's policy that the firm, its officers, employees, and representatives be at all times in compliance with state, federal and local statutes, ordinances and regulations in the conduct of our business. Many government entities and some private companies have in place ethics, gifting, and political support rules and policies for their service providers. Each member of the firm that interacts with clients at a project management and/or principal level must be in compliance with such rules and policies. To assist employees, Lochner maintains a database on LochNet which includes the rules for the federal, state and local jurisdictions in which the firm is active. The database will be updated periodically with the understanding that changes can occur between updates without Lochners specific knowledge. However, it is each employee's responsibility to inquire and stay current on the ethics policies that apply to clients or prospective clients with whom he/she is engaged in business activities. Lochner will not tolerate the violation or circumvention of any federal, state or local laws by an employee in the conduct of firm business. or by any agent or representative acting on the firm's behalf. Nor will Lochner tolerate the disregard, violation or circumvention of any of its business conduct and ethics policies. Employees who fail to comply with the laws or these policies will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. Supervisors, managers and officers must set the tone for compliance and act, at all times, in accordance with the responsibilities of their position and their duties to the firm. Any supervisor, manager or officer who directs, approves or condones infractions, or has knowledge of them and does not act promptly to report and correct them in accordance with these policies, will likewise be subject to disciplinary action. The Chief Compliance Officer will oversee compliance with these business conduct and ethics polices and will report to Lochner's Audit Committee. Lochner Policy Manual 124 13 601.0 Seeking Guidance - The Chief Compliance Officer Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/ Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Lochner's Board of Directors (the "Board") has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer to oversee compliance with these business conduct and ethics policies. The Chief Compliance Officer will report to the Board's Audit Committee. All Lochner employees are required to comply with the instructions issued by the Chief Compliance Officer under these policies. Employees must also give their full cooperation to the Chief Compliance Officer in the performance of his duties, including the investigation of suspected violations of these policies. The current Chief Compliance Officer is Phil Russell, Senior Vice President; e-mail address: prussell@hwlochner.com. In the normal course, employees should address any questions about these business conduct and ethics policies to their supervisor/manager who will relay them to the Chief Compliance Officer, if necessary. If the employee is not comfortable raising such questions with his/her supervisor/manager, they may be addressed to the Chief Compliance Officer, or the Company's President/CEO NEC), Jim Bishop (jbishop@hwloch ner.com). Lochner Policy Manual 125 14 602.0 Reporting and Investigation of Alleged Violations Functional Area: Business Conduct • Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Employees should report any violation or suspected violation of these business conduct and ethics policies to their supervisor/manager, who will report the information to the Chief Compliance Officer. Alternatively, employees may report the matter through a toll-free compliance line (1-877-778-5463), or directly to the Chief Compliance Officer or Lochner's CEO. The compliance line is operated by a third party vendor, Report It, who forwards reports directly to the Chief Compliance Officer or, in the event of a conflict, the CEO. Reports may be submitted through the compliance line 24 hours-a-day, 7 days-a-week and calls can be made anonymously. All reports will be reviewed and investigated, as appropriate, by the Chief Compliance Officer or his designee. Reports will be treated confidentially to the extent feasible, practical, and consistent with Lochner's obligations and the need to investigate and take appropriate action. It is imperative that reporting employees not conduct their own preliminary investigations. Such actions could compromise the integrity of the Chief Compliance Officer's investigation and adversely affect Lochner and others. Lochner prohibits any form of retaliation against an employee who has made a report under these policies, or assisted or cooperated with the Chief Compliance Officer's review or investigation of such matters. Acts of retaliation should be reported immediately and will be promptly investigated. Confirmed acts of retaliation will be subject to disciplinary actions up to and including termination of employment. Employees who wish to follow-up on a report may contact the Chief Compliance Officer. If, after discussion with the Chief Compliance Officer, an employee feels that appropriate action has not taken place, he/she may report the matter to the CEO. If the CEO received the initial report, the matter may be referred to the Board's Audit Committee (Ithomas@hwlochner.com). Lochner Policy Manual 126 15 603.0 Compliance with Applicable Laws and Ethical Standards Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy All Lochner business must be conducted in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws, and in a manner that will always reflect a high standard of ethics. Additionally, Lochner employees, consultants and representatives must respect the ethics policies of the federal, state and local government entities or other clients with which the Company does business. Lochner employees may not make any commitments or agreements on behalf of the firm unless they are specifically authorized to do so. Nor shall Lochner's representatives and agents be asked, encouraged or permitted to engage in any activity that a Company employee is not allowed to do directly. Each employee must become aware of the laws, regulations, rules and policies applicable to his/her activities on behalf of the firm, and if a question, potential conflict or violation arises, seek guidance from, or report the matter to, the Chief Compliance Officer, or as otherwise directed by these policies. For reference, Lochner maintains a database on LochNet which includes the rules for the federal, state and local jurisdictions in which the firm is active. Lochner Policy Manual 127 16 604.0 Antitrust Laws, Restrictive Trade Practices Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Lochner's policy is to conduct its business activities in accordance with all applicable antitrust, competition and trade practice laws. Any agreement or joint activity involving Lochner and another party, the intent or effect of which is to reduce competition, may violate the antitrust laws. Accordingly, the exchange of sensitive information with competitors, such as prices charged for services, profit margins, billing practices or other information that may facilitate reaching an agreement on prices for a specific transaction is prohibited, unless written permission has been given in advance by the Chief Compliance Officer. Information about existing and potential competitors should be collected only from generally available industry sources or from information within the public domain. Agreements with competitors to exchange such information are improper. Lochner employees and representatives shall not: (1) respond to any inquiry or survey from a competitor that requests information on prices,wages, costs, marketing activities, acquisition or development plans, or any other competitive information; (2) request from a competitor information on acquisition or development plans, prices the competitor charges or pays for any services; or(3)knowingly share with a competitor, directly or through a third party, information regarding pay scales, wages, salary ranges or compensation formulas. Employees should consult the Chief Compliance Officer if they have any question about a potential restrictive trade practice. Lochner Policy Manual 128 17 605.0 Accuracy of Client Billing / Documentation of Contracts / Retention of Business Records Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/ Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Lochner is committed to billing clients and third party payors accurately for all services it provides and in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. It is imperative that invoices and billing statements to clients and third party payors properly reflect the project on which the employee worked, the services provided, the individual(s) who performed the services, the dates on which services were provided, the actual hours worked, as well as all other data required by law and/or the applicable service contract or engagement letter(e.g., the employee's title, qualifications, chargeable rate). Invoices may be submitted only for projects on which Lochner and the employee(s)were authorized to work. Lochner's Chief Financial Officer or an independent auditor, on an annual basis, shall review the firm's billing procedures and practices to ensure that applicable laws and other requirements are complied with, and that clients and third party payors are charged appropriately for services rendered. All Lochner personnel must use their best efforts to prevent, detect and report compliance issues relating to the firm's billing practices. If an individual encounters inappropriate billing activities by Lochner personnel, he/she should report the issue to the Chief Compliance Officer,or as otherwise directed in these policies. The documentation embodying every Lochner contract or agreement shall fully, clearly and completely reflect the intention of the contracting parties as to all material items and issues that are the subject matter of the contract or agreement, including relevant specifics regarding services to be provided and fees to be paid. There shall be no "secret" or unwritten side contracts or agreements. Contracts shall be processed in accordance with the current Decision Matrix as posted on LochNet. Business records should be retained for the period of time specified in applicable record retention regulations. Employees should consult the Chief Compliance Officer for assistance with record retention requirements or the propriety of disposing of a Company record. Lochner Policy Manual 129 18 606.0 Gifts and Entertainment Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Lochner prohibits the use of gifts, entertainment or other incentives to improperly influence relationships or business outcomes. Accordingly, employees, relatives of employees, and agents may not offer, give, provide, or accept gifts, entertainment or other special preferences from any person, organization or entity that does or wants to do business with Lochner or is a competitor of the firm. Employees are also prohibited from soliciting gifts and entertainment. This prohibition described above relating to the giving or receipt of gifts and entertainment does not apply where: (1)the monetary value is not in excess of the amount permitted by applicable law or regulation; (2) the gift is part of marketing, educational or other ordinary business activity; (3) the gift or entertainment is not in the form of cash or cash equivalents, such as gift certificates; (4) the gift or entertainment does not obligate the recipient in any manner and is reasonable and appropriate for the individuals involved and the business at hand; and (5) the giving or receipt of the gift or entertainment does not violate applicable federal, state or local laws, or agency/client policies. As noted earlier in these policies, the rules for the federal, state and local jurisdictions in which the firm is active are posted on LochNet. Employees are responsible for staying current on the ethics policies that apply to clients or prospective clients which whom they are engaged in business activities. Lochner Policy Manual 130 19 607.0 Conflicts of Interest and Outside Employment Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Employees may not participate, either directly or indirectly, in any activities that could conflict with their responsibilities to Lochner or the interests of the firm. An actual or potential conflict of interest occurs when an employee is in a position to influence a decision that may result in a personal gain for that employee or for a relative as a result of Lochner's business dealings. An employee may not knowingly conduct business on behalf of Lochner with a relative or an organization with which the relative is associated unless specific written approval has been granted in advance by Chief Compliance Officer. For the purposes of this policy, a relative is any person who is related by blood or marriage. Personal gain may result not only in cases where an employee or relative has a significant ownership in a firm with which Lochner does business, but also when an employee or relative receives a substantial gift or special consideration as a result of any transaction or business dealings involving the firm. No presumption is created by the mere existence of an employee's relationship with outside firms. However, if an employee has any influence on transactions involving purchases, contracts or leases, it is imperative that he/she promptly disclose to the Chief Compliance Officer the existence of any actual or potential conflict of interest so that safeguards can be established to protect all parties. Outside Employment. An employee may hold a job with another organization as long as he/she satisfactorily performs his/her job responsibilities for Lochner and such employment does not conflict with standard Lochner business hours or present a conflict of interest or otherwise violate Lochner policies. All employees will be judged by the same performance standards and will be subject to Lochner's scheduling demands, regardless of any existing outside work requirements. Under no circumstances may an employee perform outside work during his/her working hours at Lochner. Additionally, no employee may serve as a consultant to, or as a director, officer or employee of, a company that competes with, or does or seeks to do business with Lochner, without the prior written consent of the CEO. Employees should report any actual or potential conflict of interest to their supervisor/manager, who may in turn refer the matter to the Chief Compliance Officer. Alternatively, the employee may communicate directly with the Chief Compliance Officer. Employees must obtain prior written approval from the CEO before engaging in any activity that may result in a conflict of interest. Lochner Policy Manual 131 20 608.0 Political Contributions Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy Personal Activities. Lochner encourages employees to participate in the political process on their own time. Employees have a right to make political contributions in their own name and from their own assets. Employees will not be required by Lochner to make any political contributions, nor will employees be reimbursed or compensated by Lochner for any political contributions. Political Contributions. U.S. corporations are barred by federal law from making political contributions in connection with federal elections. Many states have similar prohibitions. Therefore, except as permitted by such laws and authorized by Lochner's Chairman of the Board of Directors: • No funds or assets of the firm (including property, services and use of facilities) shall be contributed to any political organization or to any individual who holds or is a candidate for public office. • Except for Lochner-approved political action committees, business groups and trade associations, the firm shall not support any organization that raises funds for political purposes. Lobbying Activities. Without prior approval of the impacted Regional Team Leader and the CEO, no employee, agent or representative acting in an individual capacity may contact on behalf of the firm any federal, state or local government official or member or an employee of a legislative body or government agency for the purpose of influencing policy, legislation, agency regulations or any other official action. Lochner Policy Manual 132 21 609.0 Securities Laws Functional Area: Business Conduct Approved by: Lochner's Board of Directors Date Approved/Updated: November 24, 2014 Scope: This policy applies to all Lochner employees and representatives. Policy In the course of business activities, employees may become aware of nonpublic information regarding the business, operations or securities of firms doing business or competing with Lochner. The securities laws prohibit trading securities on the basis of such nonpublic information (often called Inside information") if it is material. Information is deemed to be material if an investor would consider it important in deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold securities. Examples of items that may be material include: • Financial results and forecasts; • Possible mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and investments; • Obtaining or losing important contracts; • Significant discoveries; • Major litigation developments. Information is considered to be nonpublic unless it has been adequately disclosed to the public and there has been sufficient time and opportunity for the market as a whole to assimilate the information. An employee who is aware of nonpublic material information related to firms doing business or competing with Lochner, may not buy or sell shares or other securities of these firms. Such information may not be disclosed to anyone, other than Lochner employees or appropriate agents or representatives who have established their need to know, until the information has been adequately disclosed to the public. Employees should consult the Chief Compliance Officer if they have any question as to whether certain information is material or has been adequately disclosed to the public. Lochner Policy Manual 133 22 Tab 1 I Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements LOC H N ER CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 .3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Appendix C.1 H.W Lochner, Inc. is authorized to conduct business in the State of Florida. Certification from the State of Florida Department of State follows. • 2017-126-KB 1 23 State of Florida of DepartmentState I certify from the records of this office that H.W. LOCHNER INC is a Wisconsin corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on November 21, 1972. The document number of this corporation is 829045. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2017, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 4, 2017, and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the capital, this the Fourth day of January, 2017 SEG 044A '•4, - Secretary of State Gob Nire Tracking Number:CC4392106565 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number,and then follow the instructions displayed. https://services.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfstatus/CertificateAuthentication 0 Florida Board of Professional Engineers ' 2639 North Monroe Street,Suite B-112 ' Tallahassee, FL 32303-5268 H W Lochner,Inc 4350 W. CYPRESS ST. STE.800 TAMPA, FL 33607 Each licensee is solely responsible for notifying the Florida Board of Professional Engineers in writing the licensee's current address. Name changes require legal documentation showing name change. An original, a certified copy, or a duplicate of an original or certified copy of a document which shows the legal name change will be accepted unless there is a question about the authenticity of the document raised on its face, or because the genuineness of the document is uncertain, or because of another matter related to the application. At least 90 days prior to the expiration date shown on this license, a notice of renewal will be sent to your last known address. If you have not yet received your notice 60 days prior to the expiration date,please call (850) 521-0500, or write, Florida Board of Professional Engineers, 2639 North Monroe Street, Suite B-112,Tallahassee, FL 32303-5268 or e-mail: board@fbpe.org. Our website address is http://www.fbpe.org. State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers 4.., Attests that _ r `,�7 Lochner rii- - :x.i; L IL • t;_. . -'•4 - ,: II ..1 AFBPE_ FLORIDA ItOAROOF V j • '' lemon t+bt!k RS Is authorized under the provisions of Siecticoz 471:()23, . 'r ` tato ,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly tirenscd and Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. Expiration: 2/28/2019 'W �_ 7 CA I3c.No: Audit No: 228201905013 R 894 Requirements 1 I Letter & Minimum Qualifications q uirements LOC H N ER CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 1 .3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 2017-126-KB I 26 Tab 1 I Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements LOC H N E R CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Appendix C.2 I Prime Proposer Project Experience 1. Transportation Planning 2. Smart Growth 3. Livable Cities 4. Complete Streets 5. Integration of Transportation and Land Use 6. Economic and Financial Analysis 7. Transit Planning 8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning 9. Urban Design 10.Station Area Planning 11. Traffic Engineering 12.Landscape 13.Surve y 14.Public Involvement 15.Environmental 16.Geotech 17. ITS 18.Smart Parking 2017-126-KB 127 PROJECT PROFILE 1 62nd Avenue Sidewalks Pinellas County, Florida Client:Pinellas County Department of Public Works Owner:Pinellas County Department of Public Works Mbianda Mbianda =e. fTr. r "0 727-464-3144 mmbianda@pinellascounty.org - �" , O -- Services Start Date:11/2011 T �. . irk Services Completion Date:08/2016 l.N... Role: Construction Amount: $150,000 II The existing stretch of 62nd Avenue North from 30th Street North to 34th Street North,which runs through a mixed business and residential area in Pinellas Park,Florida,had intermittent sidewalks on each side of the roadway.To improve pedestrian mobility and safety,Pinellas County wished to provide continuous sidewalks on both sides of this quarter-mile corridor. Under an on-call general engineering services contract with the County,Lochner was tasked with the sidewalk design. Lochner is providing construction plans,specifications,and estimates for fully ADA-compliant sidewalks along both sides of the roadway and for repairs and ADA upgrades to the existing sidewalks.The project includes two signalized intersections, and Lochner is upgrading the pedestrian features at these locations to meet ADA requirements.Lochner's design also ensures that the many driveways along the project are rebuilt to current design standards. LOCHNER 28 PROJECT PROFILE Tri-County Trail Pinellas County, Florida Lochner has been selected as the Florida Department of Transportation(FOOT) client:Florida Department of Transportation, District 7 general engineering consultant for a five-year period(2014-2019)under D7 a$30 million contract.Services under this contract span transportation development support tasks in the areas of engineering,surveying,architecture, Owner.Florida Department of landscaping,geographic information systems,and management. Transportation,D7 Mary Lou Godfrey Lochner,acting as an extension of FDOT staff as a general engineering consultant 813-975-6621 MaryLou.Godfrey@dot.state.fl.us (GEC),has served as the owners representative for the Design-Build project to construct the Tri-County Trail in Pinellas County Florida.The Tri-County trail Services Start Date:2015 constructs a 12-foot to 15-foot wide shared use path from the intersection of East Services Completion Date:2017 Lake Road and Keystone Road to the Pinellas/Hillsborough county line,a distance of approximately 5 miles.Much of the alignment of the Tri-County Trail extends Role:Prime through the 8,700 acre Booker Creek Preserve,the largest natural area in Pinellas County,the most densely populated county in Florida. The preserve consists of forested wetlands and pine flatwoods and is unique refuge for native flora and fauna and a home to many animals.The preserve is jointly owned by Pinellas County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District(SWFWMD)and managed by Pinellas County Department of Parks and Conservation Resources.The Tri- County trail is one part of the larger Florida Coast to Coast Trail which will eventually extend from Pinellas County on the Gulf Coast of Florida to Titusville on the Atlantic Coast. Lochner developed the concept plans, including pavement design and typical section package for the Tri-County Trail and prepared the Request for Proposal(RFP)for the design-build project to construct the trail itself.Lochner coordinated with FDOT,Pinellas County,SWFWMD,and multiple utility owners on the design and alignment of the trail to minimize impacts to the preserves natural features while still allowing for the public to experience this unique natural resource. In addition, Lochner assisted the FOOT Technical Review Committee in the evaluation of the Technical Proposals,the answering of bid questions submitted by prospective design-build teams,review of plans,permits,and calculations prepared by the design- build firm,and ongoing support and issue resolution during construction.The Design-Build project was awarded in July 2015, with construction activities commencing in early 2016.The grand opening of the trail is scheduled for July 20,2017. SERVICES • Traffic Circulation Study • Traffic/Transportation Analysis • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design LOCHNER 29 PROJECT PROFILE 1 Sidewalk Improvement - Laurel Street from Frontage Rd to Westshore Blvd. Tampa, Florida Client:Westshore Alliance Working in response to the needs of its more than 400 business members,the Owner.Westshore Alliance Westshore Alliance undertakes a number of initiatives each year to improve living Chris Weber and working conditions in Tampa's Westshore District.The Alliance has initiated a 813-289-5488 project to improve pedestrian facilities along a 0.75-mile stretch of Laurel Street, weber@westshorealliance.org from the Memorial Highway East Frontage Road to Westshore Boulevard. Services Start Date: 11/2014 Lochner is completing a preliminary feasibility study for the project,which will Services Completion Date:04/2017 involve the construction of sections of 5-foot sidewalk on both sides of the Role: roadway to make the existing sidewalk network continuous. Lochner will also include spot repairs to the Laurel Street pavement and improvements to bring Construction Amount: existing pedestrian ramps and curb cuts into compliance with the Americans with $600,000 Disabilities Act.Lochner will provide the Alliance with a study report containing preliminary design concepts; potential right of way,utility,and storm sewer impacts;and preliminary cost estimates. • SERVICES • Cost Estimate Development LOCHNER 30 a/ PROJECT PROFILE 1 Sidewalk Improvements - Columbus Ave and Manhattan Ave Tampa, Florida Working in response to the needs of its more than 400 business members,the Client:Westshore Alliance Westshore Alliance undertakes a number of initiatives each year to improve living and working conditions in Tampa's Westshore District.The Alliance initiated a Owner.Westshore Alliance project to improve pedestrian facilities on 500 feet of Manhattan Avenue(Spruce Chris Weber Street to Boy Scout Boulevard)and 1,100 feet of Columbus Avenue(Dale Mabry 813-289-5488 Highway to Nimes Avenue). weber@westshorealliance.org Lochner completed a preliminary feasibility study for the project,which involved Services Start Date:10/2015 Services Completion Date:08/2017 the construction of 5-foot sidewalks along one side of each stretch of roadway. Lochner also included spot repairs to the roadway pavements.Lochner provided Role:Prime the Alliance with a study report containing preliminary design concepts;potential right of way,utility,and storm sewer impacts;and preliminary cost estimates. Total Project Cost $171,531.00 SERVICES • Alternatives Development and • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design Analysis • ADA Facility Evaluation/Design • Highway/Roadway Design LOCHNER 31 PROJECT PROFILE 1 US 41 Roundabouts Final Design Sarasota, Florida On US 41 in Sarasota,the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)plans to fin;Florida Department of replace the existing signalized intersections at 10th Street and 14th Street with Transportation-District 1 roundabouts,as well as improve the level of service on the route for motorized vehicles,bicycles,and pedestrians. Lochner is responsible for the project design. Owner:Florida Department of Lochner is designing the roundabouts as two-lane facilities with landscaped Transportation-District 1 centers and pedestrian signals.The roundabout at 10th Street is located adjacent Walter Breuggeman to a large boat launching facility,and Lochner's design will accommodate the 863-519-2300 turning movements of vehicles towing large boats,as well as other large vehicles. walter.breuggeman@dot.state.fl.us Lochner's design adds bicycle lanes and curb and gutter along the outside travel Services Start Date:06/2013 lanes of US 41 between the two roundabouts,with curb along the landscaped Services Completion Date:04/2020 median.The project also includes lighting and ITS/ATMS design. Role:Prime Maintenance of traffic is a prime concern in this busy urban location. Lochner is preparing a detailed traffic control and staged construction plan that will keep the Construction Amount road open and maintain access to adjacent cultural centers throughout $5,440,400 construction.The plan will also accommodate the many pedestrians, including a large elderly population from nearby retirement communities that use the route. SERVICES • Roundabout Intersection Design • Pavement Evaluation/Design • Maintenance-of-Traffic(MOT) • Final Plans,Specifications,and • Signal Design Plan Development Estimates(PS&E) • Lighting Design • Construction Phasing Plan • ADA Facility Evaluation/Design • Advanced Traffic Management Development • Culvert Design System(ATMS)Planning/Design LOCHNER 32 PROJECT PROFILE 1 15th Street East/301 Boulevard East PD&E Study Manatee County, Florida Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 1 Owner.Florida Department of vJ Transportation-District 1 `-+ David Turley ; +t 863-519-2255 !Ave , david.turley@dot.state.fl.us d ` � Services Start Date:_6/2013 ::::i::mPietnDate:03/2017 Construction Amount: $1,523,258.00 4100601- H The Florida Department of Transportation,in cooperation with Manatee County, - - plans to widen approximately 4.5 miles of 15th Street East/301 Boulevard East, ; T • �' from Tallevast Road to US 41,to improve capacity and level of service on the corridor.This complete street project will entail widening the roadway from two _ to three lanes and include the addition of bicycle lanes,sidewalks,pedestrian crossings,street lighting,and roundabouts,as well as transit improvements. Lochner is conducting the project development and environment(PD&E)study. . Lochner has developed two design alternatives and conducted a comprehensive • assessment to determine the design constraints and social,economic,and environmental impacts associated with each alternative.The most significant environmental considerations were potential impacts to the nearby historic I district and historic cemetery(which required the completion of Section 106 and Section 4(f)evaluations),potential impacts to Bowlees Creek,and possible contamination issues from petroleum and hazardous waste,including from the former American Beryllium site.The southern portion of the project carries a , large amount of freight traffic;therefore,the accommodation of large truck and tractor trailers was also a key factor in the conceptual design plans. Lochner has conducted detailed traffic analyses to determine the effects of the design alternatives on level of service and delay.The analyses considered the current level of service and delay on the corridor,as well as the no-build and build scenarios in 2020,2030,and 2040.The traffic study also evaluated the need for traffic signals and other operational improvements,such as roundabouts,and provided analyses of all major(existing or potential) intersections. Lochner is now assisting with the project's public involvement program to gain stakeholder feedback,which will be used to refine the design concepts.The project locale is home to a large Hispanic community.To make the program as accessible as possible to all residents,Lochner has ensured that all public involvement materials(newsletters,advertisements,etc.)are available bilingually and has arranged for translators to be present at all public meetings. SERVICES • Project Development and • Alternatives Development and • Highway/Roadway Design Environment(PD&E)Study Analysis • Intersection Analysis/Design LOCHNER 33 PROJECT PROFILE 2 • Roundabout Intersection Design • NEPA Documentation • Natural Resource Evaluation • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design • Categorical Exclusion • Hazardous Material • Pedestrian Crossing Design(At- Documentation Assessment/Mitigation Grade) • Section 4(f)Evaluation • Public Outreach/Involvement • Travel Demand • Section 106 Consultation • Public Meeting Coordination Modeling/Forecasting • Wetland Mitigation • Traffic Impact Analysis/Study • Hydrologic Analysis/Design • LOCHNER 34 1 . Transportation Planning • 7� y 1 A 1111 Ifi City of M I AM I BEACH 35 PROJECT PROFILE 1 Strategic Intermodal System Studies 2012 Various, Florida Florida's Strategic Intermodal System(SIS)is a statewide network of high-priority Client:Florida Department of Transportation, transportation facilities that includes highways,airports,seaports, rail corridors, D7 and waterways.The SIS highways include all of the roads that previously made up the Florida Intrastate Highway System(FIHS).These highways carry almost 70 Owner.Florida Department of percent of the truck traffic,and more than half of the total traffic,on the state Transportation,D7 highway system. Lori Marable 813-975-6000 The Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)District 7 has issued a series of lori.marable@dot.state.fl.us five-year contracts to provide districtwide planning support for FIRS and SIS Services Start Date:10/2012 projects.Lochner has been continuously awarded such contracts since 1997.The Senilces Completlon Date:2018 first two contracts(1997 to 2007)were related to FIHS projects.Under the second two contracts(2007 to 2016),Lochner has been providing planning Role:Prime support for projects located on,or likely to impact,any District 7 SIS transportation facility.Lochner's tasks could include planning studies,such as corridor analysis,action plans, master plans,interchange justification and modification reports,and multimodal analysis.Lochner could also be called on to provide in-house staff or supply almost any other planning-related service,including data collection,financial analysis,traffic simulations,public involvement coordination,peer reviews of other planning studies,advisory services,or technical support for the SIS hubs. To date,Lochner haserformed more than 30 task orders under the FIHS and SIS contracts.Keytasks have included: P •A 12-mile Interstate corridor analysis to develop a master plan for 1-275 in Pinellas County. •Several US 19 corridor studies(3 to 20 miles in length)to produce recommendations for safety,operational,congestion mitigation,and access management improvements and assess how those improvements should be packaged for construction. •An assessment of the traffic impacts of a proposed new ballpark for the Tampa Bay Rays. •The development of interim alternatives on US 19.FDOT's master plan for the 11-mile corridor called for$1 billion to be spent on interchange construction and improvements.Lochner developed lower-cost operational alternatives that would improve safety and level of service on the corridor until such funding became available. •A corridor action plan for X miles of SR 44 in Citrus County to identify recommended improvements for level of service, capacity,access management,and safety,including an assessment of a route alternative through downtown Inverness. The quality of Lochner's work has been recognized not only by its continued selection over a 20-year period but by its high scores in FOOT's consultant evaluations,which have often exceeded 98%. SERVICES • Traffic Circulation Study • Traffic/Transportation Analysis • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design LOCHNER 36 PROJECT PROFILE Bravo Company Boulevard Yakima, Washington Client City of Yakima • ' Owner:Yakima County ��. ..., Reference: ss. .411111•4011W— • Joan Davenport �' City of Yakima frk • 509-575-6000 S^�. . ,l �.. .- Services Start Date:09/2011 •}• Services Completion Date: .2/2016 Role: Construction Amount: $6,500,000 The redevelopment of the 225-acre Cascade Mill District is a joint project between Yakima County and the City of Yakima that will increase jobs and economic activity in both jurisdictions.Yakima was awarded LIFT(Local Infrastructure Financing Tool)funding from the State of Washington to create a revenue development area that will transition the former Boise Cascade Mill, which once provided 200 family-waged jobs,into a mixed-use regional economic catalyst and create 200 short-term construction jobs; 1,300 light manufacturing jobs;750 medical,technology,and research jobs;and 2,580 commercial, retail, and entertainment center jobs Lochner is providing planning and engineering services for the construction of roadwaydesign in the vicinityof ��''�"` Bravo Company Boulevard.Lochner has provided g H Street to North 1st Street,as well as the design of roadway and utility enhancements from the Lincoln Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard couplet to H Street.The roadway enhancements and connections have resulted in a boulevard-style four-or five-lane arterial with roundabouts at the south and north intersections,as well as a midpoint roundabout and extensive landscaping elements.The project improvements include new hot-mix asphalt pavement,curb and gutter,sidewalks,illumination,pavement markings,storm drainage,sanitary and industrial sewer mains,potable water mains,and landscaping. SERVICES • Highway/Roadway Design • Landscaping and Aesthetics • Noise Analysis • Roundabout Intersection Design Coordination • Traffic/Transportation Analysis • Stormwater/Pavement Drainage • Lighting Design • Public Outreach/Involvement Design • Culinary Water System Design ' • Signing Design • Pavement Evaluation/Design • Utility Coordination LOCHNER 37 PROJECT PROFILE 1 East-West Corridor Study and Interchange Justification Report Yakima County, Washington Client:Yakima County Owner.Yakima County Gary Ekstedt S09-574-2305 Gary.Ekstedt@co.yakima.wa.us Services Start Date: • *.:T �• .j Services Completion Date:03/2017 x ` b _- _ J... - - - Role: • y ;` Total Project Cost: - :�:w-;. $3,415,518.00 , . , .. _ .t • - . ..14- , . . .......,... _ .. ..., , ,......f . ,„ , , ilL,.. • .. _ . . . , _. ,_ . . ,,, The East-West Corridor is a proposed river crossing transportation corridor that would connect Terrace Heights and Yakima and relieve congestion on Yakima Avenue and other major city thoroughfares.The new route would run from North 1st Street in Yakima,connect to and continue under 1-82,cross the Yakima River, and end at Butterfield Road—a distance of around 1.25 miles. H Street in Yakima would also be reconstructed from North 1st Avenue to the Cascade Mill District. The corridor is intended to provide new public transit routes and facilities for non- vehicular travel, improve emergency response times,and encourage - development in the Cascade Mills area. Lochner is responsible for the corridor ,,, study and development of the interchange justification report for connection toi - Lochner is developing a series of alternative design concepts for evaluation and assessing issues of environmental impact,right of way acquisition, constructability,and cost.The East-West Corridor mainline is anticipated to be a boulevard-style,four-lane arterial with landscaped medians,entranceway enhancements for vehicles entering Yakima,and a shared use path adjacent to the roadway.Lochner is developing concepts for an undercrossing beneath 1-82 and for the new I-82 interchange.The interchange justification report also reviews the need for ramp improvements at the I-82/Yakima Avenue interchange and provides preliminary design solutions. The two bridges crossing the Yakima River—one for the roadway and one for cyclists and pedestrians—are a major focus of the study.The river provides habitat for two species of endangered fish,and Lochner is evaluating several bridge design alternatives,of up to 850 feet in length,that incorporate design and construction strategies to minimize or mitigate temporary and permanent impacts to this habitat.The new road will also cross a disused municipal waste site,and Lochner's study addresses alternative strategies to manage the waste,which cannot be built on directly.These strategies include removal,consolidation,and the construction of a bridge over the entire site. SERVICES • Corridor Study • Alternatives Development and • Interchange Design • Interchange Analysis • Structural Design Modification/Justification Report • Environmental Study • Intersection Analysis/Design Development • Highway/Roadway Design • Retaining Wall Design LOCHNER 38 PROJECT PROFILE 2 • Landscaping and Aesthetics • Hydraulic Modeling • Capacity Analysis Coordination • Cost Estimate Development • Public Meeting Coordination • Trail Planning/Design • Traffic Impact Analysis/Study • Stakeholder Facilitation • Stormwater/Pavement Drainage • Travel Demand Design Modeling/Forecasting LOCHNER 39 CR 510 PD&E Study from CR 512 to 58 Avenue INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA . fitw • Project Description: -0Project Development& Environment(PD&E) Studies (CAT EX Type II)(5.3 miles) to improve the capacity along CR 510 from ,w ' ..,. CR 512 to 58th Avenue by widening from two to four lanes and M :E' _ '.:'..e, implementing a raised median. CR 512 currenity serves as the p. - ,. main artery in northern Indian River County connecting 1-95 to ' �, .. t s US1andA1A. 14114 "IIIIIIIIPti .,, Client: _ 1 z Florida Department of Transportation District 4 Address: 3400 West Commercial Blvd. Services Provided: Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 • Developing Environmental Documents (ESBA, WER, Contact: NSR, CSER, Section 4(f), CatEx Type II) Maria Formoso, PE • Conduct Nest Surveys for the Federal Listed Caracara Project Manager • Design Traffic Technical Memorandum (DTTM) Phone: 954-777-4677 • Noise Data Collection Email: • Prime Overseeing All Aspects of PD&E Study Maria.Formoso@dot.state.fl.us • Host public meetings Project Dates: • Extensive Coordination with SJRWM and Water Ongoing Control Districts • Traffic Studies Project Fee: $1.3M 0.-1-4?, mMVmETRIE E ENGINEERING 40 Oslo Road PD&E Study from E. of SR 9/1-95 to E. of 58th Avenu INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: This Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Study • (CAT EX Type II)evaluated increasing capacity along Oslo •• Road from E of SR 9/1-95 to E of 58th Avenue by adding two • _ , additional lanes. The widening will connect with the existing four lane section just east of 58th Avenue and to the proposed f. 4. , interchange at 1-95 and Oslo Road. The project is outside of the urban service boundary and R/W acquisition is anticipated • Client: ro ¢ Florida Department of Transportation District 4 Address: 3400 West Commercial Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Services Provided: • Prime contractor overseeing all aspects of project Contact: delivery Sabrina Aubery, PE Project Manager • Developed PER, CAT EX II, ESBA. WER, CSER, CSRP, NSR and others Phone: 954-777-4585 • Required close coordination with simultaneous PD&E Email: project for 1-95 Interchange sabrina.aubery@dot.state.fl.us • Included Caracara nest surveys and Section 7 Project Dates: consultation with USFWS 2014-2015 • Involved coordination with local Water Control District Project Fee: for canal impacts $900,000 m � tic`'e�2 METRIC E ENGINEERING 41 CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS FDOT District 6 Corridor Studies For FDOT, District 6, CS, as part of a team, developed a framework for monitoring and evaluating Phase la of the 1-95 Express managed lanes project in Miami. Evaluation was consistent with the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) National Evaluation Framework (NEF) for the five Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) recipients, the other four of which are being evaluated by FHWA. The evaluation also was consistent with over ten years of historic high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane analyses conducted by the DOT's Districts 4 and 6 in South Florida. The framework was completed in time to initiate data collection and evaluation in March 2009, consistent with prior years HOV evaluations. City of Kissimmee General Planning Services For the City of Kissimmee, Florida, CS is providing general planning services on a task work order basis. Areas to be covered include: Transportation Planning-travel demand modeling and application; traffic simulation; transportation impact reviews, traffic operations support; revenue and economic analyses; enhancing bicycle, pedestrian and transit travel; and safety planning for all modes; General Planning Services-special studies, such as demographic analysis, scenario planning, or comprehensive plan updates; GIS, Tools, and Visualization; Market Analysis; and Public Engagement/Consensus Building. Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization Gandy Boulevard Adaptation Study The Hillsborough MPO participated in a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Pilot Project that identified assets potentially subject to inundation due to flooding, sea level rise, and storm surge. A subsequent phase of the pilot identified five critical assets for additional study. One such important asset is a link between Hillsborough and Pinellas counties where Gandy Boulevard makes landfall, continuing east to the site of a planned elevated connector. The Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority(THEA)developed a proposal to design/construct the elevated connector and was interested in including adaptation strategies. The purpose of this project was to refine three proposed adaptation strategies for the elevated section of the expressway extension at Gandy Boulevard, provide conceptual designs for implementation, and outline more specific costs estimates to assist in the determination and prioritization of elements for inclusion in the THEA project. FDOT District 4 Transportation Planning and Multimodal Corridor Studies For FDOT, District 4, CS is providing on-call technical support to the Transit Development Section, primarily on transit improvement projects. Work assignments have focused on activities associated with transit Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) implementation such as Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and queue jumper and document review of various transit corridor studies, including the Central Broward Transit Phase 1, Tri-Rail Coastal Link, and BRT corridors. Multimodal Transportation Planning - Huntington Area Transportation Study, Regional Transportation Planning For Fairfax County DOT in Virginia, CS conducted the Huntington Area Transportation Study(HATS). The objective of the study was to evaluate transportation system alternatives for resolving existing and forecasted peak- period and weekend congestion issues within the area of Fairfax County that was being compounded by new high- density, mixed-use development proposed in the study area. The evaluation of multimodal congestion mitigation and demand management strategies included use of the Fairfax County subarea travel demand model. SYNCHRO to support intersection analysis, and a VISSIM analysis of innovative superstreet and grade-separated design concepts for the Route 1 corridor. The study included a stakeholder and public outreach process. 42 dor 2. Smart Growth Housing Options Plow and Amwtit»s Cons.rws Transportation Resources Choles Smart 0 Growth 0 Encourages Re-Use City of • Los Angeles Vision Zero PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS F E H R ) P E E R SI DC Fehr&Peers worked with the City of Los Angeles to implement • Data-driven approach Vision Zero.We led a robust,data-driven effort to identify the driving • Matched countermeasures with specific causes of traffic injuries and match efficient and cost-effective locations of high injury occurrences • Public outreach engineering countermeasures to address the safety challenges.We also facilitated meetings with multiple stakeholder groups to determine the City's safety priorities and develop a prioritized list of Vision Zero project locations. Our approach to the Vision Zero technical analysis included: Build the Database-Fehr& Peers collaborated with City staff to develop a single,comprehensive database that includes not only collision information but also key environmental factors, such as � roadway network characteristics,demographics,and land uses.The w's'�N �E R database is the fundamental building block of the Vision Zero LOS ANGELES 12015-2025 analysis. Address the"High-Injury Network"-The City of Los Angeles found that the majority of its collisions occur on a small subset of the city's street network.Identifying the high-injury streets and targeting them for improvements creates the highest and best use of funds with a data-driven approach. Analyze Descriptive Statistics and Identify Collision Profiles-We analyzed the collision data and environmental factors to create "collision profiles"or"collision typologies"which describe the"who, where,when and how"of collisions.For example,a collision profile may highlight collisions that involved a victim on foot or on bicycle under the age of 18 hit by a motor vehicle near a school. Match Countermeasures to Collision Profiles-Fehr& Peers conducted an extensive review of pedestrian and bicycle safety treatments to determine what countermeasures would be most effective at addressing the types of crashes identified through the collision profiles.When a certain location experiences a pattern of crashes that are categorized under a given collision profile,a specific 111k improvement can be recommended to treat that distinct crash type. REFERENCE: Establish Safety Priorities through Multi-Stakeholder Outreach -Fehr Valerie Watson, Pedestrian Coordinator &Peers worked with City of Los Angeles staff to facilitate multiple LADOT meetings with city agencies and community groups to determine 100 South Main Street, 9th Floor how to prioritize the City's safety improvements. Participants Los Angeles, CA 90012 considered important factors including geographic distribution, (213) 928-9706 equity,effectiveness,and cost. Based on the outcomes of the valerie.watson@lacity.org stakeholder outreach, Fehr&Peers developed a prioritization scoring approach and mapped the City's Vision Zero priority intersec4i'pns and corridors. • DDOT MXD + Trip Generation Tool PROJECT HIGH[ IGHTS FEHR '' PEERSIDC Fehr& Peers DC customized its mixed use trip generation tool, • Local validation MXD+,for residential-over-retail development in Washington, D.C. • Big Data based on validation data collected at over 60 mixed use developments in the District. The final trip generation model incorporates contextual factors to accurately predict total person trips and mode choice between auto,walk, bike,and transit. The full set of models achieve a better statistical performance than ITE rates alone and other existing research. The model advances site-level trip generation research in two major ways. First,it calculates total person trips independently of mode choice. Secondly, it calculates mode choice with sensitivity to the amount of parking provided on site,a major finding in the connection between parking provision and travel behavior at a local site level. The model and spreadsheet tool allow improved predictability for expected trips from proposed I buildings and therefore the level of impact a planned building may '" _Y • have on the transportation system. Fehr& Peers DC is assisting DC • •-•-abb DOT to adapt the spreadsheet tool to a public-facing web I f' application. • REFERENCE: Ryan Westrom, Senior Transportation Planner/Engineer • DDOT /�� 2000 14th Street, NW, 6th Floor Washington, DC 20009 (202) 671-2300 ryan.westrom@dc.go45 Walk First Investment Strategy San Francisco, CA PROJECT HIGH[ IGHTS FE H R ) PEERS DC In response to Mayor Lee's 2013 Pedestrian Strategy to cut WalkFirst built on the SF Department of Public Health's pedestrian fatal and severe injuries in half by 2021, the City of extensive database of pedestrian collisions since 2007 and San Francisco assembled a team to develop a thoughtful,data- identified the corridors and intersections that are most dangerous for pedestrians in terms of injury count and injury driven approach to prioritize targeted safety improvements severity. over the next five years and to convince residents and policy makers that significant investment would achieve the Mayor's goals. Fehr&Peers' role in the WalkFirst project included: •Identifying the top pedestrian collision factors,or driving causes of pedestrian injuries • Reviewing potential engineering countermeasures that 0 COMMIT 0 BUILD ; address pedestrian safety,including proven effectiveness and estimated implementation cost EVALUATE 0 •Matching factors that contribute to pedestrian collisions in San 0 DEVELOP Francisco with infrastructure treatments that are most efficient Helping Cities Impieme t and cost-effective at addressing the collision causes ;VISION ZERO We compiled all of the information on pedestrian injuries, ANALYZE collision factors,and proven countermeasures into a master dataset that we used to generate multiple scenarios for PRIORITIZE infrastructure investment.We defined each scenario,mapped ;r...- MATCH© them, and produced summary statistics on the injuries targeted by and countermeasures recommended in the scenarios.This process helped the City understand the implications of the different studied investment strategies,and after much discussion one investment scenario was selected for implementation.We have turned the database over to the City so that they can continue to update it and utilize it as new pedestrian collision data becomes available and political priorities shift. Out of the coordinated technical analysis and public outreach efforts,the City has developed a list of capital improvements for pedestrian safety. REFERENCE: Chava Kronenberg, Performance Analyst City of San Francisco • Office of the Controller, City Performance /M11650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 (415) 558-6378 chava.kronenberg@sfgc4$org • Downtown Dallas 360 Plan Update PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS F E H R ') PEERS DC • First small-area validation of local MPO's model The City of Dallas and Downtown Dallas, Inc.are • Big Data used to adjust model undertaking an update to the Downtown Dallas 360 Plan, • Layered network and multimodal performance measures which addresses issues of walkability, mobility,and urban design, among others. Fehr& Peers DC is collaborating with Moore, lacofano and Goltsman, Inc.to recommend Urban Mobility Principles,a Street Typology,and 1 --- Signature Corridor design concepts to enhance streetscapes and mobility in Downtown Dallas. Fehr& Peers DC conducted the first small area validation of the North Central Texas Council of Governments'regional travel demand model to reflect conditions in Downtown, _ using origin destination big data from Streetlight Data to 'J • make significant adjustments to model trip lengths and travel patterns within and to Downtown.The validated yD S • r • �` 7 Rte Vii= model will enable Fehr&Peers DC's analysis of the effects of the land use and transportation network changes proposed in the Downtown Dallas 360 update. This project also includes multimodal performance measures, including comfort-based active transportation measures, applied to a set of layered priority modal amd�• networks. The multimodal layered network concept is 4 ! ' ' one first presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers'Planning Urban Roadway Systems, which Fehr& Peers staff authored. • REFERENCE: Peer Chacko, Planning Director • 1500 Marilla, 2DN Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 67148900 peer.chacko@dallascityhall.com Imu �' _ _ • -C al I! Rz� CASE STUDY ---■k' 111 /I. L11 I :beg/ 4 o Rising Seas: Understanding the '= ..u.i___ / impact of sea level rise. •.-4.1A117-1.1 IIII .� id SOUTH FLORIDA L-/ ll-- L in[' .- =1 _, 0 ___7 , . ... miguycht, i_______ 1 ABOUT THE PROJECT 11 Mr ❑ • U� 1 A study was completed with the University of Miami to 7 �i 1 , .., understand how much residential space was necessary , ;YAM. , i.. • i" -p` to move the families affected by possible sea level rise in the next 50 years. Different teams were tasked with -.:.:2;--".—_ y F'-1--' residential displacement scenarios in different South Florida ,. , :11 .. neighborhoods which included the City of Miami Beach, City '" I l of Miami,City of North Miami,the Florida Keys,and Miami- ;' / Dade County. s L ? _.; .I e• r • - _ USE OF ZONAR Zonar was used to quickly understand how many buildings .,0--- '1 � .6, and how many floors would be required to replace lost surface area due to sea level rise. Various scenarios were ' ` L/ run based on different sea level rise projections. Areas ' a. - _4011° • around transit stations were selected for density increases. RESULTS TYPE Density Study In the City of Miami, it was hoped that the needed density could be achieved to have buildings no more than 10 YEAR 2017 stories. However,Zonar showed that 20 story buildings would be needed,with 30 and 40 story buildings added PROPERTIES 5,000+ to create a better skyline. A Transfer Development Rights (TDR) program was also proposed to facilitate the gradual AREA SIZE 2.5 square miles densification of single family areas in higher elevations at lower risk of rising sea levels. Z :NAR zonar.city byGridics M info@gridics.com 3 . Livable Cities -'mss �• City of MIAMI BEAC H y.L op M - NCPPC Tools Improvement Project PRO JECT HIGHI IGHTS FEHR ' PEERS DC • Recommended a package of innovative performance Layered Network Expertise measures to fill the gaps between goals and practice Fehr& Peers DC led a team to develop an improved system for measuring Montgomery County's transportation system performance and prepare a strategic plan for incorporating recommended improvements to the current modeling framework.Fehr& Peers DC collaborated with Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission staff to develop a suite of multimodal transportation performance measures that address the County's stated land use and transportation goals. Although a thorough compilation of the County's policy and planning documents revealed that the County's goals embrace all aspects of a multimodal transportation Summary:Transportation Performance Metrics system,the County had not yet deployed the metrics and tools needed to evaluate how land use and transportation • decisions affect those goals. Fehr&Peers DC "" recommended a package of innovative performance „&„T, «WER,KILN measures to fill the gaps between goals and practice, Pt 4ROMANC£ • ) 04. including metrics for people driving,taking transit, biking, and walking,such as:multimodal person delay,bicyclist • comfort-based accessibility,and vehicle miles traveled • (VMT) per person trip.Fehr& Peers DC prepared a case study application of the metrics to the Bethesda Downtown Plan to help illustrate the approach for the Planning Board and to test the capability of the County's current modeling and transportation analysis tools to compute the metrics. Fehr&Peers DC has reviewed the County and MPO travel demand models as well as several alternatives to inform a • strategic plan with near-, mid-,and long-term recommendations for the County's approach to maintaining in-house travel demand modeling and transportation analysis resources. • REFERENCE: Eric Graye MNCPPC 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301) 495-4632 eric.graye@montgomeryplannirnorg California Pedestrian Safety • Assessment Pro�;gram PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS FE H R i PEE R S 1 DC On behalf of the California Office of Traffic Safety(OTS)and the UC • Award-winning program recognized as a Berkeley Institute for Transportation Studies Technology Transfer national model Program (Tech Transfer), Fehr&Peers developed a manual for • Fehr&Peers staff developed and authored the manuals Pedestrian Safety Audits to be performed upon request from California cities/communities. The manual included collaboration with an expert review panel and review of best practices in pedestrian safety. The program has been recognized as a national model. The guide incorporates best practices in pedestrian safety engineering, planning,and policy,and is intended for use by a team FREE of two evaluators.Assessments have been performed in PEDESTRIANSAFETY approximately 60 California cities,with Fehr& Peers staff serving as ASSESSMENTS the lead evaluator on all assessments. `.t•".'�"�?J't' These audits included a full-day of walking the streets with City staff VT, and interested parties to identify the problems and remedies related �_:_: •— to pedestrian safety. The studies also created a GIS map of historical •ti pedestrian-involved collisions in each jurisdiction. This project won a 2009 Best Practices Award from the California APA. In 2012, Fehr&Peers worked with Tech Transfer to develop a complimentary Bicycle Safety Assessment program and evaluation guide. REFERENCE: Eduardo Serafin, Technical Program Manager • ITS Tech Transfer Program /-e 109 McLaughlin Hall, Mail Code 1720 Berkeley, CA 94720 (510) 665-3445 eduardo.serafin@berkeley.ed€1 CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS FDOT District 4 Planning•Storm Surge and Transportation Network Disruption For FDOT, District 4, CS is building upon the recent FHWA Climate Resilience Pilot Project for Southeast Florida to consider potential transportation network implications related to storm surge and sea level rise. Using storm surge scenarios based on historic storm tracks,we will model transportation network disruption and identify associated economic impacts.We also will test the recently adopted Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model(SERPM 7.0)to better understand the role of critical evacuation routes. 52 4. Complete Streets 9. AN modes - -41114 - it 1 AN awe AN abrades • drab l ti City of M I AM I B E AC H 53 PROJECT PROFILE 1 244th Avenue Improvements Sammamish, Washington The City of Sammamish converted approximately 1 mile of 244th Avenue,from SE Client City of Sammamish 8th Street to NE 8th Street,to minor arterial standard and constructed 800 feet of new roadway to complete the previously discontinuous route and connect Owner.City of Sammamish neighborhoods to the north and south.The new section of roadway was located Jed Ireland above Category I wetlands. Lochner was the prime consultant for the entire 425-295-0500 design process,from preliminary concepts and preparation of an environmental jireland@ci.sammamish.wa.us impact statement(EIS)to final plans,specifications,and estimates and Services Start Date:01/2005 construction support services. Services Completion Date:09/2012 The environmental impacts of the new 800-foot section over the wetlands were a Role:prime key concern in this project.Several design options were examined.Ultimately, Lochner designed two preliminary alternatives.The first extended the road across Construction Amount the wetlands on a new bridge with filled approach areas.The second involved the $9,300,000 construction of a retained fill section across the wetlands.The first of these two alternatives,which had the fewest environmental impacts,was selected as the preferred alternative,and Lochner designed a 600-foot-long,eight-span bridge, with a superstructure consisting of six 38-inch bulb-tee prestressed concrete girders.The substructure comprised short columns resting on long drilled shafts. Lochner's final roadway design included two travel lanes separated by a landscaped median or left-turn lane. Bicycle lanes and sidewalks were added on both sides of the road.Lochner also coordinated with city staff to incorporate other cost- effective and environmentally conscious solutions into the design.These solutions included reusing existing storm drainage systems,installing new stormwater filters,and increasing the size of a nearby detention pond. The design included a number of traffic calming measures,such as a curvilinear road layout and two single-lane roundabouts. The use of roundabouts instead of signalized intersections resulted in increased safety and reduced congestion for the roadway. A further safety enhancement was the addition of medians between the sidewalks and bicycle lanes and the traffic lanes. SERVICES • Highway/Roadway Design • Landscaping and Aesthetics • Alternatives Development and • Prestressed Concrete Girder Coordination Analysis Bridge Design • Corridor Study • Inter-Agency Coordination • Roundabout Intersection Design • Traffic/Transportation Analysis • Public Outreach/Involvement • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design • Environmental Impact Statement • Final Plans,Specifications,and • Stormwater/Pavement Drainage • Wetland Mitigation Estimates(PS&E) Design • Sustainable Design/Construction • Traffic Calming Feature Design Features LOCHNER 54 PROJECT PROFILE 1 Issaquah-Fall City Road, 242nd Avenue to Klahanie Drive Widening Sammamish, Washington Client:City of Sammamish Owner:City of Sammamish Samuel Park 425-295-0500 • • SPark@sammamishws ', • •{M., • Services Start Date:03/2016 • Services Completion Date:03/2018 -4 Role: • ` Construction Amount: i .t '' $18,000,000 Ailts 114010•110t' . i • West of 242nd Avenue, Issaquah-Fall City Road is a five-lane facility,comprising two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane.At 242nd Avenue,the road narrows to three lanes,and this lane reduction frequently causes traffic backups.To reduce these congestion and level of service issues,the City intends to widen the 0.75-mile section of Issaquah- Fall City Road from 242nd Avenue to Klahanie Drive. Lochner is responsible for the project design. Lochner is developing design plans to widen this 0.75-mile stretch of roadway to provide four travel lanes and a center turn lane and to tie in to the roadway section west of the project.The design will also accommodate multimodal access,either with curb,gutter,and sidewalk or on a meandering path. For approximately 900 feet,this section of Issaquah-Fall City Road has a sag curve vertical alignment,which runs through a stream and wetland area. Lochner's design will replace a large- diameter culvert in this section and raise the roadway by approximately 15 to 20 feet to eliminate the sag curve and improve safety. Lochner will also develop design alternatives, including roundabouts,for the intersections at 242nd Avenue and Klahanie Drive to accommodate the widened roadway conditions and the existing and projected traffic volumes.Additional aspects of the project include LED lighting,landscape architecture,and the oversight of right of way acquisition. SERVICES • Highway/Roadway Design • • Alternatives Development and • Intersection Analysis/Design • Lighting Design Analysis • Roundabout Intersection Design • Landscape Architecture • Right of Way Acquisition • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design • Final Plans,Specifications,and • Culvert Design Estimates(PS&E) LOCHNER 55 PROJECT PROFILE '. Harbour Reach Drive Extension - Phase Mukilteo, Washington fY •.v ','', �, , 104 +Yr4 • • •� Client:City of Mukilteo + . - _ Owner:City of Mukilteo r Eif Andrea Swisstack ,. _ • .., z -125-263-8000 • Services Start Date:06/2016 -`` ' r- ,t ..` ' Services Completion Date: '_2/2018 s •. 9 1:.. ,� �tl / � r. ��-�'�t_ yyam,, r! 11 ...,li " Role: elf,11111111111-1-11111 #' '41141111%'6,......"-:- .-._,. _ . Construction Amount: `cam__ I The Harbour Reach Drive project in Mukilteo includes two distinct sections—the south segment includes design of a new roadway extension to this minor arterial connecting Beverly Park Road and Harbour Point Boulevard over extremely challenging terrain.The new roadway includes a mixed use pathway,mini-roundabouts,structural earth walls,culverts,and a new traffic signal. Design is further challenged by the need to address two fish-passable crossings.The north segment is approximately 5,000-foot long and includes intersection safety improvements, roundabouts,and reconfiguring the roadway into a three-lane section"road diet" in order to incorporate bicycle lanes in the travel way.The project has completed concept-level planning and is moving forward with final design. SERVICES • Cost Estimate Development • Structural Design • Public Outreach/Involvement • Lighting Design • Quality Control and Assurance • Alternatives Development and • Traffic/Transportation Analysis Analysis • Grant Administration LOCHNER 56 Rumrill Blvd/13th St Cycle Track and Complete Streets Study and Design, San Pablo and Richmond, CA PRO JFCT HIGH IGHTS FE H R , PEE R S'I,DC Fehr& Peers led a complex complete streets study and 30% • Road diet design for the Rumrill Boulevard/13th Street corridor in the • Enhanced pedestrian crossings cities of San Pablo and Richmond. The project challenges • Multiple stakeholders included limited roadway connectivity and high demand for all modes on the corridor,in addition to the corridor being over two miles in length and crossing through two jurisdictions. Fehr & Peers worked closely with both jurisdictions along with local residents and business owners,Contra Costa Health Services, and the Local Government Commission on this Caltrans Environmental Justice Planning Grant to analyze existing conditions,develop three alternatives for the corridor, and identify and develop a preferred alternative for the corridor that was taken to 30%design.The project included significant stakeholder outreach,conducted in multiple languages, including a walking tour and workshops.Traffic operations analysis was completed for the 2-mile long corridor to support to the alternatives analysis. Fehr&Peers and another firm collaborated to prepare the 30%plans and cost estimate for the .:<_`_. preferred alternative of parking-and landscape-protected cycle .ten. , tracks,enhanced pedestrian crossings,and improved bus stop ii — a-i INIM=111amenities,which were supported by reducing one auto travel i 1 I 1r l + , lane in each direction. REFERENCE: • Michele Rodriguez City of San Pablo (AIL 13831 San Pablo Ave San Pablo, California 94806 (510) 2155031 micheler@sanpabloca.gov Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets Plan, Tactical Urbanism, PS&E, and HSIP Grant, Oakland, CA PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS FEHR '1 PEERS DC • The complete streets redesign aimed to improve Fehr&Peers helped prepare a complex,political,and safety and provide a better balance of mobility and community-driven Complete Streets Implementation Plan access for all users. for a 2.4-mile segment of Telegraph Avenue in Oakland • As part of the planning process,we designed and from 20th to 57th Streets. implemented a"pop-up bikeway"installation on Telegraph Avenue to demonstrate the parking- Fehr& Peers led the multi-modal operations analysis to protected cycle track to users on Bike to Work Day. present tradeoffs and prepare concept plans that address • Please see http://www.fehrandpeers.com/2016- the needs of all users on this major corridor.Level of bikeways/for more information service for pedestrians at crosswalks and data collection on driver yielding behavior informed crosswalk enhancement recommendations,and auto level of service analysis helped us understand trade-offs between accommodating regional through put and providing safer,dedicated space for transit, bicyclists,and pedestrians. The team developed a number of design options and a preferred design including a 5-to-3 lane road diet for the majority of the corridor,guided by responses to a public survey and input from community members at public - tip` ' ;tom workshops.Complete streets improvements included a • z• buffered bicycle lane or Class IV separated bikeway, bulb- • '..0III 311w.t,11 ... } _ . outs and median refuges to improve pedestrian crossings, os ..: - u = additional crosswalks, landscaping,and a consolidated 1 _ .. - and 1R bus route with improved bus boarding islands and = �_= � bus stops to improve the transit rider experience and ss improve transit speed. in • Fehr& Peers developed cost estimates and an `� - `T 1 implementation plan,including a striping plan and curb management plan,to implement the cycle track and buffered bike lane segments.At the same time,we , ,. .t � worked with the City to secure additional funds for the project,preparing a successful HSIP Cycle 7 application for T Telegraph Avenue between 29th and 40th Streets, nJ� • i'.� _ • ''l securing over$4 million in funding for PS&E and IL -_ ( ' construction. Phase 1 of the project a Class IV separated bikeway and crosswalk improvements were implemented between 20th and 29th Streets. REFERENCE: Arthur Dao, Executive Director Alameda County Transportation Commission • 1111 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, California b 607 (510) 208-7400 b . Integration of Transportation & Land Use • • City of Y4`.. 59 CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS Chattanooga Rail Implementation Plan For the City of Chattanooga,Tennessee, CS led a feasibility study for rail transit implementation on the historical Tennessee Valley Railroad which would connect the downtown with the airport and Enterprise South,location of a Volkswagen factory, Amazon,and several other major employers. The project emerged from the MPO's 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP),also led by Cambridge Systematics.The City partnered with the Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority (CARTA),the local transit agency,as well as the MPO and other stakeholders,to return passenger rail service in this historical rail-oriented community. Southeast Area Transportation and Land Use Study For the Nashville Area MPO, Cambridge Systematics,as part of a team, provided support for the Nashville Southeast Area Transportation and Land Use Study in the areas of systems evaluation,travel demand modeling,freight, and economic/fiscal impact assessment. The purpose of the study was to plan for growth in the southeastern portion of the metropolitan region.A preferred growth vision was developed, as well as complimentary land use and multimodal transportation recommendations to support regional and local planning efforts. In addition, a growth management toolbox also was developed. 60 . I 4,1":„...ArC".. . i t CASE STUDY .. es ki i , 3 } t_ The Underline: Incentives for . 1 i , ,- / - , , pedestrian friendlyfrontages. _ ~- �.�. - g • ;-) MIAMI, FLORIDA .-i, 4i 'j ABOUT THE PROJECT The Underline is a 5+ mile proposed linear park underneath • ;X, ' ; the Miami Metrorail elevated tracks with multiple properties •. n^, abutting the project. Current zoning regulations treat ....%..., . ,t - w ,': these frontages as alleys/backside,with little pedestrian ,i Mami'I interaction.The goal of the Underline is to activate this dormant urban space and encourage pedestrian friendly development and active uses along the dense corridor. Vizcaya S.ation • USE OF ZONAR . Coconut Grove Station t 1 Coral Gables I Douglas Road Station e , The Underline and the City of Miami engaged Zonar to quickly understand the development impact of proposed setback changes along properties fronting the Metrorail `TJnivanity Station path. Small changes were tested and proposed to encourage development of active uses along the park,to South Miami Station I Atlam,cOce,1 mitigate loss of development potential due to new setbacks, and provide incentives to property owners that ensure their support of the project. TYPE Thoroughfare RESULTS Study The Underline is partially funded and begun construction. YEAR 2016 Proposed zoning changes are currently moving through the local legislature. PROPERTIES 200+ AREA SIZE 5 Miles " Zonar helped us facilitate the conversation between property owners and city officials regarding the potential changes of over 200 properties fronting the proposed Underline project. - Meg Daly The Underline Founder a.. , :' zonar.city J: Z ='"NAR by Gnelics info@gridics.com N CASE STUDY _ -� TOD: Analyzing Proposed Zoning Changes Bordering a - New Transit Line ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO ABOUT THE PROJECT ea g The City of Albuquerque needed to analyze proposed zoning code changes that would increase density around stations along a new BRT transit line.These changes are expected to A be enacted as a new zoning regulation. R USE OF ZONAR -., The City of Albuquerque engaged Zonar, Urban 3, Crab === �= ,� k Tree Group, DPZ, Placemakers,and CNT to provide recommendations and understand the development potential along the new transit line. Zonar was used to analyze empty lots and understand the potential of proposed zoning changes. Data created by Zonar was then used for tax and financial forecasting,to analyze potential infrastructure demand,and to model new incentives to encourage development. Zonar identified unwanted outcomes with the new code in study, including non-compliance of empty parcels.Alternative TYPE TOD Study solutions were tested with Zonar in real-time at public workshops. YEAR 2017 PROPERTIES 10,000+ RESULTS Results are currentlybeingused to create new legislation for AREA SIZE 5/8 mile around g each transit the proposed TOD. station " As consultants to both municipalities and developers alike, we have seen just how useful Zonar is on both sides of the zoning equation. l wouldn't want to analyze the implications of zoning change without it. DPZMatt Lambert DPZ Partner NAR by Cridics info@gridics.com 6 . Economic & Financial Analysis City of M I AM I BEAC H63 WTL +a Miami Intermodal Center/Central Station Joint Development Miami, FL \_*1.' 1\st ' :_,._, ,C4 •• :" •fir iRrr, 1 , _ 3 � n.. MIAMI INTERMODAL CENTER -`y 0 Mit ,�,,,w 1" — 6 `.,.. .,--.- Since tedSince 1994, a Principal with WTL+a has been advising the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority(MDX) on joint development potentials adjacent to the Central Station of the Miami Intermodal Center, a 1.4 million sq. ft. multi-modal transportation center near Miami International Airport, which opened in 2012. Assignments in 1994-95, 1998, 2000-02, and 2007-08 have focused on market and financial feasibility, phasing strategies, implementation and funding mechanisms for development on up to 14 acres. In 2013, WTL+a was retained to update our 2008 study. We completed a market analysis identifying commercial development potentials as well as a financial feasibility study to estimate revenue yields accruing to MDX and FDOT. We are currently preparing a study to examine housing potentials. Our studies will serve as the basis for developer outreach and solicitation in 2016-2017. References: Mr. Javier Rodriguez, Executive Director Mr. Christopher Bucknor, Senior Vice President Miami-Dade Expressway Authority EAC Consulting, Inc. 3790 NW 21st Street 815 NW 57th Avenue, Suite 400 Miami, FL 33126 Miami, FL 33126 305. 637.3277 305.265.5474 jrodriquez(a.mdxway.com CBucknor(a eacconsult.com WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC—Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 3 64 -...,: WTL +j H Street Corridor Revitalization Washington, DC i 'i ulliili 1 �T�. ' I� 6. f. ME 1 t. •. Iiiit; % .‘!'±, ti,, . ii , � lid. $ .41. i 'Sit. t . , 41 ,1d „' • ya • 13-1---41.„.• v i I s '7.1;-ti . 40.., ,-.a_.. 4 .:-..„ 0 �_ ,-;6."C.... , 1 ki �,lli 111. . ' ►• In the early 2000s, the District of Columbia undertook a major planning effort to revitalize the H Street NE Corridor, a once major retail/commercial corridor that had significantly declined during suburbanization and the riots that burned parts of Washington after the assasination of Martin Luther King in 1968. A Principal Consultant with WTL+a served as project director for a team headed by HOK Architects on behalf of the District's Office of Planning. Once the third most economically important commercial corridor after F and G Streets downtown),over 20 years of disinvestment, crime, high vacancy and deterioration characterized the district, a one-mile corridor. Of 230 commercial and residential buildings, 70 were vacant storefronts; almost half of the upper floors were vacant; and approximately 15 acres of former Urban Renewal land was undeveloped or underutilized. Despite these declines, the corridor had 24,000 vehicles per day and over 35,000 Metrobus commuters. The Master Plan focused on improving circulation, attracting reinvestment and commercial vitality and strategically redeveloping empty and underutilized surface parking lots. Five redevelopment concepts were created, with the centerpiece element as a$53 million "Great Streets" streetscape improvement program that included construction of Washington's first link in a network of fixed rail streetcars. Ongoing implementation has resulted in $25 million in Tax Increment Financing, attracting new and renovated housing, construction of a major grocery store and a lively nightlife/arts district. The H Street Festival, now 10 years old, attracts thousands to its annual events. i i i WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC—Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 9 65 WTL +a DART Spring Valley/Main Street/Arapahoe Road TOD Studies Richardson, TX ,�. :,:: I —. • • • N. �-. , . , o� *: . . I : '� �_ � •. .k. ` Iron- dim .69 III 9' n; i w, 04 I -.g. t,,...e..----, ..._ r : - .1 '•�:-- - — '_ In 2002-03, a Principal with WTL+a (formerly with ERA)assisted the Dallas office in examining TOD potentials surrounding three Dallas Area Rapid Transit(DART)station sites on behalf of the City of Richardson Department of Development Services: Spring Valley, Galatyn Park and Arapaho Center. We focused on sites located within one-half mile of each station, forecasting development potentials for a mix of uses to 2020. Since that study, DART has experienced significant private investment in TOD at multiple stations on its various lines. More than$5.3 billion in TOD investment has been completed, under construction or planned around DART stations. At Spring Valley, TOD investment includes: Brick Row Urban Village (mixed-use project with street-level retail and 500 housing units); 440 additional multi-family units in two projects; and two hotels (Marriott Courtyard and Super 8). At Arapahoe Center station, TOD investment includes: Madison at Melrose (200 units); Richardson Crossroads Condominiums; and a hotel (Wingate by Wyndham). There has been major investment in TOD at Galatyn Park: Eisemann Center for Performing Arts;AMLI Galatyn Station (285 units); several business-class hotels, including a Marriott Renaissance adjacent to the station; and, numerous corporate and Class A office buildings within one- half mile surround the station. WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC—Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 13 66 WTL Miami 21 Plan Miami, FL • �i eLar+ryaa.�ei , The City of Miami, directed by the Office of Mayor Manuel (Manny) Diaz and the Department of Planning, undertook a comprehensive examination of the city's zoning code with the goal of restructuring the land use plan to be more predictable and balanced. Land use policies under the former code resulted in high rise residential buildings constructed next to single-family detached neighborhoods, limited mixed use planning and significant development pressures on historic districts and low-rise commercial corridors. Miami 21 was created as a new zoning and land use approach based on design and planning practices utilizing the principles of New Urbanism. To effectively revise the citywide zoning code, a Principal Consultant to WTL+a(formerly with Economics Research Associates/ERA),was selected by Mayor Diaz to work with Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk and the urban design firm of Duany/Plater-Zyberk(DPZ)to analyze the economics and land use implications of a better balance between economic development, historic preservation, parks and open space, arts and cultural and citywide transportation networks, including long-term planning for a streetcar system. The economic analysis considered density implications for re-zoning, commercial/preservation concerns in Little Havana, Little Haiti and Miami's Design District, and scale/land value differences associated with transit systems such as a streetcar network. Economic findings informed planning and urban design policies for citywide rezoning and evolving regulatory standards under Miami 21. WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC—Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 10 67 1511rCAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS North Carolina DOT, 1-95 Economic Impact Study For the North Carolina DOT,CS led a study to examine the economic impacts of tolling the 1-95 corridor. Cambridge Systematics also examined the economic impact of alternative funding options. Due to the visibility of the project and the stakeholder objections to tolling,the project required innovative stakeholder engagement to ensure that the findings stand up to public scrutiny. Documenting the tradeoffs between the benefits of the transportation investments and the impact of alternative funding sources in a transparent,objective manner was critical for the success of the study and for the 1-95 improvement project as a whole. CS was responsible for leading the traffic forecasting,funding option analysis,stakeholder engagement, and economic modeling. The results were used by the North Carolina legislature, North Carolina DOT and the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)in deciding how to proceed with funding the necessary improvements for the 1-95 corridor. Florida TOD Design Guidelines For FDOT, District 4, CS is providing technical assistance and coordination service to the DOT and its partners with an interest in supporting effective implementation of transit oriented development(TOD)within the seven-county Southeast Florida region.The initial emphasis is on TOD implementation in the most urbanized portion of the region including Miami- Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties. 68 7. Transit Planning a; Aft At 4EE K(!15•TIO�<N IiiIIII! City of PROJECT PROFILE 1 Tampa Bay Premium Transit Feasibility Study Hillsborough County, Florida The Tampa Bay region has experienced rapid population growth over the last 30 Client:Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. years.The three largest counties in the seven-county Tampa Bay Area are Hillsborough,Pinellas,and Pasco counties.Together they contain the majority of Owner:HART-Hillsborough Area Regional the region's roughly 3 million residents.Thanks to nearly continuous growth, Transit Authority urban development now stretches continuously across the borders between the counties,as is the case between Pinellas and Pasco along US 19,between Pasco Reference: and Hillsborough on Bruce B. Downs and US 41,and between Hillsborough and Scott Pringle Pinellas along SR 580.Additionally,the region is greatly spread out across more Jacobs Engineering 813-746-3416 than 2,000 square miles of land surrounding Tampa Bay.The area for this study scott.pringle@jacobs corn was defined as the urbanized area within Hillsborough,Pinellas,and Pasco counties. Services Start Date:12/2016 Services Completion Date:09/2018 The purpose of this study was to look at the urbanized area of the greater Tampa Bay metropolitan region,and investigate the feasibility of potential regional Role:Subccnsultant transit options.The desired planning approach started at a high level by creating a vision for an overall regional transit network and philosophy based on public input Total Project Cost: and a market analysis.The study then moved from regional vision into more detail $86,647.00 on specific travel demand corridors,and operational and capital components based on results of a situational appraisal.The situation appraisal reviewed previous planning studies,transportation conditions,socio-economic factors and land development activities.It included incorporation of planning options and alternatives previously identified in other studies,as well as connecting the study area to neighboring counties in the Tampa Bay Region.As part of the initial screening process,those individual components were adjusted and connected as needed to serve a regional travel demand and be consistent with the regional visioning mentioned above.The study team then developed a methodology for calculating the public's comprehensive return on investment for each alternative.Alternatives that had the highest potential returns were further evaluated for feasibility,with appropriate projects then selected to move into PD&E or other further development stages as appropriate.A public outreach process engaged the public throughout the project. Lochner was a subconsultant to Jacobs Engineering Group on this study,assisting with stakeholder engagement and coordination;the Fatal Flaw Analysis(Phase One Screening);the Return on Investment and Benefits Evaluation(Phase Two Screening);development of an Implementation Plan;and QC review of final documentation. SERVICES • Feasibility Study • Transportation Planning • Public Meeting Coordination • Transit Planning/Design • Benefit/Cost Analysis • FTA Analysis/Study • Stakeholder Facilitation • Light Rail Transit Planning/Design Documentation • Alternatives Development and • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) • Socioeconomic Evaluation Analysis Planning/Design • Stakeholder Committee Group • Cost Estimate Development Coordination • Long-Range Planning LOCHNER 70 PROJECT PROFILE 1 Taylorsville-Murray Transit Corridor Study Salt Lake County, Utah This project entailed determination of the best location for a Bus Rapid Transit Client:Fehr&Peers Transportation (BRT)corridor to connect existing transit systems to locations lacking easy access Consultants to mass transit,specifically the Salt Lake Community College Redwood Campus. Lochner prepared existing right of way and roadway lane configuration files to Owner.Utah Transit Authority determine areas where an exclusive BRT lane could be accommodated or added. The team also identified constraints and issues related to project constructability Reference: on existing roadways and recommended strategies to resolve them.Lochner Robin Hutcheson developed conceptual typical sections for the corridor showing both center-and Salt Lake City Corporation side-running BRT lanes. 801-535-6630 Robin.Hutcheson@slcgov.com Ultimately,the locally preferred alternative was determined to be a four-mile Services Start Date:06/2008 stretch that runs from the 5200 South UTA TRAX station(intersection of Vine Services Completion Date:06/2009 Street and Cottonwood Street)to the Salt Lake Community College(Redwood Road)via Murray Boulevard and 4700 South.To reduce BRT travel time,a portion Role:Subconsultant of the locally preferred alternative was routed on canal right of way,bypassing the Redwood Road and 4700 South intersection.Lochner coordinated with the Total Project Cast: North Jordan Canal owners and prepared a concept level cost estimate to enclose $18'989 approximately 800 feet of the canal. After this project was completed,Lochner was selected,as part of the Stanley Team,to conduct environmental clearance and 30%design services for the 4- mile-long preferred alternative connecting Salt Lake Community College to downtown Murray and area commuter and light rail stations. SERVICES • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) • Highway/Roadway Design • Cost Estimate Development Planning/Design • Existing Conditions Analysis • Alternatives Development and • Right of Way Plan Development Analysis • Constructability Review LOCHNER 71 PROJECT PROFILE 1 UTA Network Transit Study Statewide, Utah '` it — Client:Utah Transit Authority �.; , -.4'1.4`LAKE CENTR'. �„ '`y * ']' 'to SALT LAKE CENTRAL Owner.Utah Transit Authority P '' 'Y .. • Hal Johnson +"�' " r 801-237-1905 5 t : hjohnsonaride uta.com .Asuir. Illhoin 1 _..., 1 • •.. , , .r. Service Start Date:11/2011 _ 11 Services Completion Date:12/2014 ''' '-*a-k Role: - = s, d H1.1..1 0411L"W _ Total Project Cost: i�C—" r $798,719.00 . 1 .1, 4 .,, ... ... ../ , _ _ I --_, , _ __ // 1 ...w.. _ „" I . /, al , . Lochner is leading a study to identify next tier of capital projects,focused on " ,\ capital investment for expanded BRT service throughout the Salt Lake Valley,andt potential operations strategies for UTA to focus on delivering after completion of \ , ••••./�/ 1 the Frontlines 2015 program.The Network Study is building on the work completed in the latest Regional Transportation Plans(RTPs)developed by WFRC and MAG to identify potential capital investments and lower profile investments, such as headway improvements,system coverage,connectivity,transfer centers _ - ' --- and and enhancements at key stops.The study area spans UTA's service area,whichc includes Weber,Davis,Salt Lake,and Utah counties. :-' L '. i T,.a ..`- I•L . '..t Via. SERVICES • Transit Planning/Design • Local Municipality Coordination ----•-- ""' _ • Stakeholder Committee Group • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) ea'.;' lirAlI "O`" Coordination Planning/Design • Inter-Agency Coordination LOCHNER 72 BiC Boothe honed ComoBug LLC Boothe Transit Consulting (BTC), LLC is led by President Jeff Boothe who has spent nearly forty years in the public transit industry. He combines deep knowledge of the public transit industry; decades shaping federal laws, regulations and guidance that govern public transit; counseling clients on federal compliance issues; substantial understanding of the Ifederal government as a Congressional staffer advising former • United States Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Mark O. Hatfield to advance the first light rail project in Portland, Oregon through the appropriations and federal approval process, as the leader of two major transit industry coalitions, and in the representation of many clients before the Department of Transportation, and the Federal Transit Administration and, a proven record of providing strategic guidance to clients seeking to secure federal funding and finance for capital projects through the Capital Investment Grants ('`CIG") program. Services offered by BTC include: • Strategic advisory services to transit agencies, cities and project sponsors seeking to advance transit capital investments, including project prioritization, identifying funding options, and, project finance; • Advise on complying with federal laws, regulations and guidance impacting project approvals, project finance, procurement, and Buy America; • Technical assistance regarding the securing funding under the CIG program, including Core Capacity, New Starts and Small Starts. BTC was formed in May 2015 after Boothe spent nearly thirty years in private legal practice and ten years on Capitol Hill. He is the only employee of BTC. Familiarity with FTA Processes Boothe combines deep and long-standing knowledge of the FTA statute, rules, and guidance with extensive project experience. Starting in 1987 Boothe began to work on projects seeking to navigate the New Starts and now CIG processes for project approvals. Further, Boothe has shaped the laws, regulations and guidance for project approvals having directly drafted the current definitions for Bus Rapid Transit Projects, the Program of Interrelated Projects and advocated for the elimination of the "baseline" alternative, the FTA Alternatives Analysis process and Final Design leading to the current stream-lined project approval process. As Chair of the Capital Investment Grants Working Group, he has had a greater impact on the current CIG project approval than any person not currently working at FTA or on Capitol Hill. Further, Boothe has extensive project level experience working directly for transit agencies with projects in the New Starts and now CIG process, or as a sub-consultant to engineering firms. 73 BiG Booth.Tr.nrt C«.wlto q'LLC Current Project Work for Transit Agencies • Downtown-Riverfront Streetcar Project - provide strategic counsel to the Project Management Team through my contract with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) and the city of West Sacramento regarding the FTA project approval processes to the Project Management Team that is comprised of Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) and Yolo County Transit; the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento; and, Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG), which is leading the project management team. The project is currently in Project Development, was included for funding in the President's FY 17 Budget, and is expected to execute a grant agreement in Fall 2017. Ed Scofield, Sacramento Regional Transit- (916) 321-3854. January 2011-present. • Laker Line Bus Rapid Transit Project - represent Interurban Transit Partnership (ITP) and provided strategic counsel on project specific issues, including compliance with the National Environmental Policy (NEPA) for a site acquired to serve as the CNG fueling station for the project and the ITP bus fleet. Project is in Project Development and recommended for funding in the President's FY 17 Budget and expects to receive a grant agreement in Fall 2017. Peter Varga - Interurban Transit Partnership - (616) 456-1941. Summer 2015-present • Seattle Center City Loop - represent the city of Seattle for the project that was included in the President's FY 17 Budget and expected to execute a grant agreement in mid-2017. Reviewed the drafts of the submission to the FTA for the FY 17 Budget and provided strategic counsel to the city of Seattle as the project advances through Project Develop- ment. Andrew Glass-Hastings - city of Seattle - (206) 684-4384. January 2015-present • Southwest Light Rail Extension - represent the Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB)which is a five country entity that provides capital funding for all Metro Transit CIG- eligible projects. Role is to advise CTIB staff and Board on the CIG project approval process, review risk assessments prepared for each transit way project that is or will be seeking CIG funding, and advise CTIB on actions to protect the financial interests of the five counties that comprise CTIB. Currently reviewing the risk assessment for the SWLRT and providing strategic counsel on the project schedule, project cost and risk items that might affect both cost and schedule. The project has been approved for entry into Engineering by FTA. Mary Richardson -Counties Transit Improvement Board -(651)222- 7227. January 2014-present • Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) - following adoption of a one-half cent sales tax in November 2016, MARTA sought assistance to: (1) develop technical capacity within MARTA to understand the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program project development and approval process; (2) to develop criteria for establishing project priorities among several proposed projects within the boundaries of Atlanta, including expansion of the streetcar, bus rapid transit and Clifton Corridor LRT; (3) participate in negotiations with the city of Atlanta to develop the project priority list; and, (4) work with the MARTA staff to develop project recommendations to the MARTA Board; and, (5) to educate the Board regarding the CIG program, to explain the criteria selected and support the staff to secure approval of the MARTA Board of the staff recommendations. Ben Limmer- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority- (404) 848-4401. December 2016- present. 74 8. Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning C)A City of MIAMI BEACH PROJECT PROFILE US 41 Roundabouts Final Design Sarasota, Florida On US 41 in Sarasota,the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)plans to Client Florida Department of replace the existing signalized intersections at 10th Street and 14th Street with Transportation-District 1 roundabouts,as well as improve the level of service on the route for motorized vehicles,bicycles,and pedestrians.Lochner is responsible for the project design. Owner.Florida Department of Lochner is designing the roundabouts as two-lane facilities with landscaped Transportation-District 1 centers and pedestrian signals.The roundabout at 10th Street is located adjacent Walter Breuggeman to a large boat launching facility,and Lochner's design will accommodate the 863-519-2300 turning movements of vehicles towing large boats,as well as other large vehicles. walter.breuggeman@dot.state.fl.us Lochner's design adds bicycle lanes and curb and gutter along the outside travel SeMcesStart :06/2013 lanes of US 41 between the two roundabouts,with curb along the landscaped Services Completion Date:04/2020 median.The project also includes lighting and ITS/ATMS design. Role:Prime Maintenance of traffic is a prime concern in this busy urban location. Lochner is preparing a detailed traffic control and staged construction plan that will keep the ConstructlonAmount: road open and maintain access to adjacent cultural centers throughout $5,440,400 construction.The plan will also accommodate the many pedestrians,including a large elderly population from nearby retirement communities that use the route. SERVICES • Roundabout Intersection Design • Pavement Evaluation/Design • Maintenance-of-Traffic(MOT) • Final Plans,Specifications,and • Signal Design Plan Development Estimates(PS&E) • Lighting Design • Construction Phasing Plan • ADA Facility Evaluation/Design • Advanced Traffic Management Development • Culvert Design System(ATMS)Planning/Design LOCHNER 76 PROJECT PROFILE Emigration Canyon Bike Study Salt Lake County, Utah Emigration Canyon Road,a 9-mile corridor that stretches from Rotary Glen Park Client Salt Lake County east to SR 65,is a popular route for cyclists, runners,inline skaters,and recreational drivers,as well as serving the needs of local residents.To improve Owner:Salt Lake County the facility for all users,Lochner is leading a study to identify transportation and Andrea Pullos roadway needs along the corridor and develop potential improvement options 385-468-6620 that address the interests of both active and traditional transportation users. apullos@sico.org Lochner will also develop preliminary design plans for the proposed alternatives. Services Start Date:12/2014 Services Completion Date:03/2016 Lochner's first task included the use of an interactive online map to gather input from the community on existing traffic levels,roadway conditions,safety issues, :Prime user facilities,and geotechnical and slope stability. Lochner also evaluated the existing conditions and compared the results with the issues identified by the Total Project Cost: community.The Lochner team will develop improvement alternatives to meet the $249,915.00 needs of both recreational and local users.These improvements could include roadway and shoulder widening,slope stabilization,separate uphill and downhill bike lanes, buffered bike lanes for passing,advance warning signs,water bottle filling stations,restrooms,and wayfinding signage,as well as improved sight distances,drainage,and parking facilities. With the corridor serving such diverse users,public outreach and consensus will be key to the success of the project.Lochner will undertake a comprehensive public engagement program,encompassing public meetings before and after the development of alternatives,one-on-one meetings with property owners and businesses, meetings with local cycling groups, the publication and circulation of educational materials,an interactive website,and the use of social and traditional media. Lochner will also present regularly to the Emigration Canyon Community Council and coordinate with the Emigration Canyon Roadway Improvement Committee(ECRIC).ECRIC has a wealth of knowledge on canyon issues,and Lochner will hold an afternoon working session with the ECRIC team to discuss the potential improvements and obtain the members'input and insight. LOCHNER ?7 PROJECT PROFILE Pleasant Grove Bicycle Master Plan Study Pleasant Grove, Utah Lochner is providing project management,bike/pedestrian facility planning,and Client:Mountainland Association of public involvement services for the development of a comprehensive Bicycle and Governments Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan for the City of Pleasant Grove.The plan will focus on strategies to develop a high level of bicycle and pedestrian friendliness,and Owner:Mountainland Association of detail ways to connect existing and planned facilities within Pleasant Grove and Governments among its surrounding communities. Lochner is also providing steering committee Jim Price oversight,aiding in evaluating existing conditions and programs,creating and 801-229-3800 carrying out a public participation program(including a survey,public workshops, jprice@mountainland.org and other outreach activities),aiding in developing a project prioritization and Services Start Date:11/2012 implementation plan,and completing the final master plan document. Services Completion Date:12/2013 SERVICES Role:Prime • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design Total Project Cost: • Public Outreach/Involvement $82.354.00 LOCHNER 78 PROJECT PROFILE 1 Bothell-Everett Highway Corridor Improvements Bothell, Washington Client City of Bothell Owner:City of Bothell _ Jason Torrie 425-806-6832 jason.torrie@ci.bothell.wa.us • Services Start Date:12/2006 Services Completion Date:06/2015 _1® r i . �� J grist Role: .A- _ Construction Amount: $5,726,000 • As part of the City of Bothell's SR 527 Route Development Plan,intended toMINIM improve motorist,cyclist,and pedestrian facilities along this major corridor,the _ City widened Bothell-Everett Highway(SR 527) between 228th and 240th Streets. - pyo Lochner was involved with entire project's delivery,including initial project development,assistance with the successful federal funding application,public involvement,preliminary and final design,and construction support services.In the planning stages,Lochner performed traffic analysis along the corridor and produced a design report that examined access to the Bothell-Everett Highway, signalization along the corridor,and channelization options to improve operations of a major Bothell-Everett Highway intersection.For the project's environmental study,impacts to the surrounding wetlands were a key consideration. Lochner's t . team performed detailed mitigation analysis,and several mitigation measures .•— were incorporated into the design to minimize wetland impacts. Lochner's design widened Bothell-Everett Highway to an urban arterial with four travel lanes,a center turn lane,and bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both sides.In keeping with the City's downtown regeneration plans, Lochner incorporated landscaping,street lighting,and urban design elements into the plans.The design also included access management measures, improved transit stops,a traffic signal upgrade at 228th Street,and a new signal at the entrance to the Country Village retail center.Lochner also performed stormwater drainage design,noise analysis,ITS design,and structural design for two large retaining walls. SERVICES • Highway/Roadway Design • Intelligent Transportation System • Noise Analysis • Intersection Analysis/Design Planning/Design • Utility Coordination • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design • Signal Design • Alternatives Development and • Stormwater/Pavement Drainage • Streetscape Design Analysis Design • Lighting Design • Final Plans,Specifications,and • Retaining Wall Design • Signing Design Estimates(PS&E) • Hydraulic Analysis/Design • Landscaping and Aesthetics • Construction Support Services • Culvert Design Coordination • Public Outreach/Involvement • Traffic/Transportation Analysis LOCHNER 79 . Fremont Bicycle Master Plan, Fremont, CA PROJECT HIGHI IGHTS FEHR j PEERS IX Fehr& Peers is working closely with the City of Fremont on All of these projects have regional significance and further conceptual design of four innovative bikeways throughout the the recommendations made in the Alameda County City and the update of its Bicycle Master Plan to develop an All Transportation Commission Multimodal Arterials Plan prepared by Fehr&Peers that looked at modal priorities and Ages and Abilities Bicycle Network and a phased provided recommendations for each arterial in Alameda implementation strategy.The Plan focuses on analyzing the County. traffic stress of bicycle facilities and integrating policies and priorities from the City's Vision Zero Action Plan.The Plan established near-term priority projects around the Priority Development Areas,which include the Fremont BART Station and ACE Station.The Plan includes consideration of intersections, including protected intersections,to support bicyclist safety and support for turning movements at intersections.The project has focused on linking the City' existing trails network,on-street bicycle network,and planning for existing and future trail expansion along the Bay Trail, Dumbarton-Union City, and East Bay Greenway corridors.The Plan integrates with the large-scale new development proposals around the Warm Springs and Irvington planned BART Stations, including the 2-way separated bikeway we are designing through the new development at the station. 'i 6' Through this process, Fehr& Peers developed conceptual �`(. 1.,- --,t,--- �,pea designs for separated bikeways and protected intersections to ��:':_ � ��^14 • 1,�` build the first phase of All Ages and Abilities Bikeways in �;, ' Fremont. This includes a north-south spine on Fremont "Av. " --... , . ` N'. Boulevard and an east-west spine on Walnut Avenue to provide tri ` ' last mile BART station access and Priority Development Area \- • Ilk r k access. Fremont Boulevard addresses bicycle and pedestrian g ` safety issues on the highest injury corridor in Fremont according . ' 116•1.1.1.11.011104t to the City's Vision Zero analysis. With our cost estimating and R W: conceptual design,the City was awarded a $1.2 million Caltrans �.._,_,.J...wk... ■ a'""' HSIP safety grant to build the Fremont Boulevard project and is moving forward with the first phase of Walnut Avenue using repaving funds. This work complements our innovative bikeway design in the Warm Springs Innovation District associated with lame-scale redevelopment. REFERENCE: • Rene Dalton City of Fremont �� 39550 Liberty Street Fremont, California 94537 (510) 49486535 rdalton@fremont.gov J Street & Covell Blvd. Protected Intersection • Davis, CA PROIFCT HIGHLIGHTS F E H R () PEERS DC • First protected intersection in Davis and in California Fehr&Peers assisted the City of Davis with the • Unique intersection design implementation of their first protected intersection;this protected intersection was the first in California and one of the first in the United States when it was constructed in 2015. Fehr&Peers led the traffic engineering-related components of the East Covell Corridor Plan. Following a peer review of the Corridor Plan by the Dutch Cycling Embassy,the City directed our team to design a protected intersection at J Street/Covell Boulevard. Lacking North American design guidance(this was 2014 before FHWA or NACTO provided guidance on protected intersections), Fehr&Peers staff used the CROW Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic for geometric,signing/striping and signal design guidance. Unique aspects of the intersection's design include the provision of on-street bike lanes in addition to off-street multiuse paths, protected-only left turns on all approaches and protected right-turn phases on approaches with high right-turn volumes.Fehr& Peers staff have subsequently been involved with other protected intersection designs in Davis as well as for cities � in Northern California,Southern California and the r. __�r ' Colorado Front Range based on our initial pioneering of _ - — the concept at the J Street/Covell Boulevard intersection. • 81 17th & Garfield Bicycle Signal EI Design Project PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS F E H R ) P E E R S j Fehr&Peers designed a bicycle signal on the Garfield Neighborhood • Part of The Garfield Street Neighborhood Bikeway in Denver at 17th Avenue.The bicycle signal facilitated Bikeway Plan to utilize a collection of bicyclist and pedestrian crossings of 17th Avenue from Garfield treatments including traffic calming, signing,marking,and intersection Street onto the pathway system in City Park.We also prepared improvements. signing and striping plans.We participated in public outreach with two workshops and fieldwork conducted between December 2014 •hborFwod sok � and September 2015. Based on the polling and comment cards,the proposed changes at Garfield Street and 17th Avenue were strongly supported by both City Staff and the community. Neighborhood residents and school teachers,students,and parents repeatedly requested an access point into City Park with a safe crossing.The concept plan for the intersection included the following changes: , • Signalize intersection with pedestrian signals :w ' • Add center pedestrian and bicycle refuge median --•••»-- Create paved connection to the existing City Park a--•– ..w�. roadway • • \ • Install passive bicycle detection w ftpli• � • Add bicycle-specific wayfinding pavement markings- _ • Install curb extensions I ••,. - , _ • Stripe intersection pavement markings r""""`"` Restrict left turns into or out of Garfield Street `-., • Stripe"do not block the box"pavement marking L1 "N,..—.... City Park,the Denver Zoo,and the Denver Museum of Nature and Science are walking and bicycling destinations for residents living along Garfield Street.The proposed crossing at 17th Avenue provides a direct connection from the Garfield Street Neighborhood Bikeway to these destinations in City Park. REFERENCE: Chris Krook, Staff Engineer Transportation, Denver Public Works • 201 W Colfax Ave, Dept. 508 / Denver, CO 80202 (720) 865-4003 Christopher.Krook@denvergov.org 82 East Arapahoe • • ortation Plan PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS F E H R > P E E RS DC Fehr& Peers assisted with Active Transportation-related aspects for Fehr&Peers applied our StreetScore+tool to the East Arapahoe Transportation Plan.The plan required a complete calculate a comfort index for biking and walking alternatives analysis, investigating short-term and long-term options, within its limits on East Arapahoe Avenue from Folsom Street to 75th Street. The project was broken out into two phases. Phase 1: Project Management and Orientation Update, Refine Purpose&Need, Identification&Evaluation of Tier 1 Conceptual Alternatives, Definition of Tier 2 Conceptual Alternatives—Tier 2 Conceptual Alternatives Development, Public and Agency Coordination. Phase 2: Project Management and Orientation Update, Eight PMT meetings via conference call,One PMT meeting in-person, Definition of Tier 2 Conceptual Alternatives— Pedestrian and Bicyclist Facilities Design Workshop, Evaluation of Tier 2 Conceptual Alternatives, Preferred Conceptual Alternative Refinement by Section, Plan Phasing&Documentation, Public and Agency Coordination. 7rin7,East ! ! Arapahoe Transportation Plan REFERENCE: Jean Sanson, AICP Senior Transportation Planner Alik,,IIP, Works & Transportation, GO Boulder City of Boulder, P.O. Box 791 AIL Boulder, CO 80306 (303) 441-4106 SansonJ@bouldercolorado.go83 9. Urban Design ••• 1(A : • 37 iNN-.." - t , - 4 `::;\_ -• City of MIAMI BEACH 84 Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan Palmetto Bay, Florida .. 4••••11,1.1...1,0•84/./..,*•0,...4 11.6.11.47. .........,S ..•... 100 ** i7•11.441'47•449.4:44.114 i .1 t4 — • •••j• ....:4Arr.44.740.1,44ostil j/ • Ex,stmo NM of war ' ••".•04... , • !,:t . -- i -. 1 Pe::t'41:'J:'•:44 , ..,5•-0,2;-0-11*-0.,7*0'3.7 23-0' , 15%0' L i,[41%1 i•.a• •' ,••ttn, 4 4" •a rftior.A :-`k''' * . • „,„, ,, ALA e ' "5 L".., Zia .,,6,.....; •,,, ,. g 1 4.,., .... '',' -6 3 6 - - • 2 •o fo 15 ,. ./ • i ill.': :: f 44 *:. ...i il fi7,?..■ill.t in 14 1:gi ti .. • 4‘..... ; . 4 o & L :tArosuil:'..11'1 --,; 1 4 1 1 1 L . .. I ,e• ...... ,..,__ ..," - j .., ..„-,. .t, - 4, • I# • •.. F. . fl ::" 4,.. ,.• 4, • Je ,....t .... ,. . ...„ • .r„, •"' • ',v., ,0 ' --Sel' .'f'st,i 4?...ii.•:-.." _ ,.;,. ...i. _____ !mg,* . •t•4•Ttee . ' ••,.,..., "sr ...t.f) ..1; f' 4/..;;;I— .71; "'- •d• •...-11---- -., • - , ,7 „ _ at- . ... ." 1. fr,„,,, ii e'7 Si _ r '4 ., i • 4 .......t41.....szEam. , -- ,...., - r- , ,...r .. „, / - . - .. .17.---...-:.' .., A• A ltiAage••••• ,,.... '''. r 1 • ii . . • M . t#1 4 :•+ ?:': . * '?" ‘741111F. ilk- 1 Ait • Fir4 1,,, * il -2- . , . t . . 111-0, . AL., tit. A III --••• • ' _44:7 x0... i• 1_46,- A 7 4 . 1: .4;07 ' viR -,.... Gf,.0 • ' " itoks'iter __1• • : .. _ _ . 7, ,,,. . Ilt •A,71., =he - .; . ..... ;•:„. 0,--- -,..A.'......,..,,,44 ,..,,-. w, •4.014 0 / .&:::. Ala 4:1 ** '••4 U I. 4 (jj .,4,1 — .f .:-.., . . . ".. 'f•-•' - - I - - ,' , ., ---- — '-a• :' , .;.: ',le._ '',t-•-• - •-• • . • "ef -.if , -it• ak. ,, ...461 - 4 , e • , -4.. f•.-'. - ' --1 .. .; * • 4, , ' ' ., .... • ._ 'i ii 'istriiienj I. fol / i. • ••-*, ita ' -411% rit , 0., 4,--'Y • de ,.. E .... . a b: • 1 - 4."., . - '', • t • . a - --••- .1010.11111.1111%1144000. y .r.• "Ift ..,•••• Ns.,., ----- .c -.. Cc' S.'o,3-.0 S.. f"-•"--- ... F.J• ii.....z.......1544 . Client:Village of Palmetto Bay Construction Cost:$300M Team Members: Director of Building&Capital Start Date:3/2014 Alfredo C. Sanchez,Joshua Rak Projects Completion:04/2016 9705 East Hibiscus Street Palmetto Bay, FL 33157 Description: B&A prepared the Downtown Master Plan that is centered on the Darby DelSalle future Main Street(currently Franjo Road). Large five-acre sites that face this street 305 259 1271 are proposed to be subdivided with internal streets to create a grid pattern that will ddelsalle@palmettobay-fl.gov allow permeability to these large sites and bolster interest in Main Street. Land use changes are proposed as part of the Master Plan. ba 85 Port Tampa Bay Channelside Master Plan Tampa, Florida • rte- 1 - 1 ..itt r * ,,, 18III IiiT1l :^ 3_ -^-"”.MF...... :`_;ria. law, � - —� - w" r..R rr 7L.:t i'� •'•1' J.•,- 1. -, ..,. 1 . ' �-..ice...._=ar.�,'P �.. "wj'.a'.%•�' �... - kill/;;7/ / //l 1 --�.,�, in.., 1 . !il / ti __ f �h "w / j w i - 41i_ " - ,,da .7.,.;-.-;:-.7,41 mX. A '-�• _ 1..-441r 1r .... 1.; , • ^'�.� 1 ...i.,.•Ai ;�,Ir .�\� .y., -t�3 �_ -'ALL__.. w -_ )p t --- fi -R ' ‘'. ' .i• ra' - -- -.rte �.. L,. s I ` �-�— ;r _ _ALL `'•� __ '-`l-z�1_ 1►r� -t k• "1401411114'J - .rQ=rte.= ._ .", .-•- :; w , N. 41". I^ ,, +L1a•' �� ® • 4111( , „ ''> J. l`: 9 Client: Port of Tampa Construction Cost:$1.5B Team Members: 1101 Channelside Drive, Start Date:2014 Alfredo C. Sanchez, Randy Hollingworth, Tampa, FL 33602 Completion:TBD Joshua Rak Ram Kancharla Description: Bermello Ajamil & Partners, Inc. (B&A), in conjunction with the VP, Planning & Development Renaissance Planning Group, is preparing a Strategic Plan and a Master Plan of 813.905.5162 R Kancharla@Tampaport.com the Channelside Properties owned by Port Tampa Bay.The plan will maximize the land utilization of the Port of Tampa lands by creating an active and commercially successful waterfrontin consonance with cruise and other waterborne transportation i activities, creating value for both the Port and the City overall. ba 86 1 Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Fort Lauderdale, Florida r is _ a I 1 L- I . I J ' it � I1111''1IIIIIII' ?J11111iiI.. . - /d , !lrI IIt�!11iirriJii- rt - 111111l ,1l ` ' "• `I I I; I,I IIII iI lilll.- Lill!'( l l ,.n ` 11111!1.! qr7�� I !I!1u� TI I IJ 11 I1��. mo , .Cl. :'1'I').11'i1'(I ''''.\`\ ` '+k� �`1-il tr,. ' :'4; -4 444 'Sl ►as Lr \ ' - `" - '''..., i-.:---- _ i .41.:a„... _, ,400,4 4 ->0.4 ! 17 • a.41° 's ii : ;. M y I , -, a \ 1 l e* 1 - 4 If J' rte- )10 j j : '/ , : wvt d J7 7 d 0TTld7J `. , � I a. ma ! � r �I. r• �' f r < <� -a -1/ 1 , ': -1114.1.- 9'a l-.-,.r ... y 1L� fteel ♦ •• pi '` 1 j• I CroKbcgeY StewStew --- -- �. `—.—.• - — a..aeoa Client:South Florida Regional Construction Cost:$N/A Team Members: Transportation Authority Start Date: 12/2014 Alfredo C. Sanchez, Randy Hollingworth 800 NW 33rd Street Completion: 12/2015 (design) Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Description: B&A was part of the HNTB team that was contracted by SFRTA to Lynda Westin identify infrastructure improvements and joint development opportunities in the 954.788.7923 Cypress Creek Tri-Rail Station area. This area was identified in Broward's 2035 westin@sfrta.fl.gov Long Range Transportation plan as a mobility -hub- a transit access point with frequent transit services and high development potential.The market analysis was able to determine the near-term and mid-term demand (by-use)within the larger study areas, which helped to provide a basis for the financial joint development evaluation. 87 Plusurbia 20 Seventeen l. • ` r I` _ i,-i,,,r �.`.-.- ' /'le C' = ��� .�N-"'� •'w�.a,,, .-. t x17 � u 6 Ta r----••i '� moo. Village of El Portal • - � ; ZONES .. l Zone 5b I .. `TQ.!... HISTORIC VILLAGE AND FORM-BASED CODE Zone is i'34 /-� Zone 4 _ E L PORTAL, FLORIDA CovcZon. l . • -' 1 Project Type:Planning&Zoning Project Status:Approved - Vidl X1.5 t Site Area:256 acres Team:PlusUrbia -" Client: Village of El Portal a,-a.a,... Client Contact: David Rosemond, El Portal Village Manager, (305) 795-7880, drosemond@villageofelportal.org Year(s) and term of engagement: started 03/2015- ended 04/2017 =•� ' — was rna The historic Village of El Portal unanimously .��_ w... w adopted a visual and user-friendly form-based code. The zoning code will preserve El Portal's _ picturesque residential enclave while creating ,e,N.... = -�-:•--- room for economic development on land annexed .-,._'� to the Village. The development site, east of the : .. FEC railroad tracks near Biscayne Boulevard, is ���" �'�� slated for properly-scaled mixed-use development ARTICLE VL SPECIFIC�O Z0NES that will create jobs, services and tax base. ARTICLE VI,FIGURE 1.ZONE S STANDARDS-SUB-URBAN RESIDENCE ks_a ,i i....... ..:� Ra,<ai. PNNIIN I PlusUrbia, which also serves as the Village's a=195bNTa+r Re.a am mry DI',Mid M..01 a•.0y.3 SFw.Ec.pio ...ly.T... %Wien Tv .: consultant for planning and zoning, is creating �> ;,"�.:�.•V•Tat:�." "" standards that will make the NE 2nd Avenue _::. corridor more walkable with incremental UN ow 1,rod,- wLd.a. wn... mixed-use redevelopment. The top priority is to �.a.-,. ap.=... a �•. encourage moderate growth while protecting the - • , - • peaceful residential neighborhoods on either side ,B,J'"`,- • of the corridor. c ,,,,,,,;,o—till.;, }- ~ D Sia♦So o� SA sin. ..R..y_,.-. . l Rear SaE.w PnonB.dnp 5*'As F B. S.m l 0..... * _ St min ynn as,ts N O nad.q Ocoee,ow a imar D.Rrc-iaa..n ••4 IN.•ron 8ubq 1S IL wk. ..a SINN.,.Sl ar.. Rim 3.mn..,Nary/ AMOK, -a mI 9 It Gautlnp 30%naa alt.v,.+d mos Res:Sa I" aa+.1.0 •`b a•bq a.a S.s.,,INO,r.u.wa1 wean d to {• ENQiRKi1T FN..yard dew Tra ewe?,.'P.m'.a.uq s aramal nary anwd D-S.F C. 1.p'uq-1 does,rot cWA P<c•3,.a^a 2 foam Am. Fes Sd...* S..a DJv.,C,N 2SINN�: LPN'•17%we".*,... _.-Puce.M.NY 3R..r..tt 4i1 r 1 1.27• v*d.M an d Flaadr.00. _ ._. lq. oai•9.•...0 F.a.ri' I D..+r /04. rye,&F.rq .a..la.. 88 Plusurbia 20 Seventeen *.'C .....a•-4•--;1f .,;'"t om • .+'til - - 1 HialeahTOD . ... . ..-.41v:40,00.0—....... MASTER PLAN AND TRANSIT . ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HIALEAH, FLORIDA p, , Project Type: Transit Oriented Development „ ,` �; Project Status: Completed N,w.4f 11.0+ `' s Site Area:313 acres 4 Team:PlusUrbia 4 ;� : e 41. ,,,E Client:City of Hialeah Client Contact: Debora Storch, NCARB, Planning •y & Zoning Official City of Hialeah, 305-492-2012, , • '' !`. dstorch@hialeahfl.gov :,1,:l':1_::::! '+ .t ,I IYear(s) and term of engagement:started 03/2016- �'ended 10/2016 �' p PlusUrbia created a master plan and regulations for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) around the Market District and Transfer rail stations in Hialeah. The design will support compact, mixed- use development around rail connectivity. II, 4111 , Affordable housing will cut household costs • - ''' ' (41111- dramatically by being within walking distance of rail transit that connects to all of Miami-Dade — �IIIII County's major job centers. • wains • .rr, .:�''"' The Market Station District covers about 100 - • "•s , >1 - ` acres in area where stakeholders are interested in '. • I_. creating space for artists, events, restaurants and r —=^ retail. Transfer Station has more than 150 acres -_= _< - `' that can support increased density, open space _.., and a vibrant lifestyle connected to Metrorail and •t 0 -• ' , ...7-;.- Tri-Rail. >p ;`-4- ' '>. ...A �.' IF • 89 Plusurbia 20 Seventeen WynwoodNRD ��- n►- iv NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION -, ':' DISTRICT NRD-1w7 •:;-"*. MIAMI, FLORIDA Project Type:Planning&Zoning � 2-s•-:-.- Project Status:Completed / rr Site Area:273 acres r� ,, .. . . ~s - - -moi Team:PlusUrbia Client: Wynwood Business Improvement District . _.. r Client Contact:David Polinsky, Wynwood BID, �� - �.- - ` ,0 786-527-0094, david@fortisdesignbuild.com % .-• - '' Year(s) and term of engagement:started 03/2014- ----'E,. "` • ended 12/2015 . LI .141=1.1111111 The Wynwood NRD enhances pedestrian big lor..........0.- experiences, promotes diverse housing and funds • « - -.� . open space and centralized parking in a mixed-use, ; ,• . 24-hour neighborhood. The APA award-winningri-er-74- 4 _ . .plan preserves unique street art and industrial _. �" characteristics while creating a framework for a [11-7-jt- : L,�: Tr:: dense, walkable urban development with new , .,-.. O►" —- 7;• housing, retail and open space in an arts district. i iJ �• gas.* r _ It supports creative industries with walkable streets, "p;-.7.,.....,--- - r • .. transit corridors and green space.The NRD creates gm +a.• .4 •-� more residential development while also allowing _1i3► ="'-�— �..; for smaller units to serve millennials and artists � I _ ;-Ir__," rr`-rr with affordable apartments and live-work units. A ____Join -Jaha Transfer of Development Rights program allows _ warehouse owners to sell the development rights aril el ,, ‘\. to their buildings - so development pressures do3'r� �•` I �' not eliminate legacy structures. ,, _' -.,� y , .++yI. ., . .\ r' , is:, , 'N s tip . 90 r 10. Station Area Planning •r x47' _. 4. _ "f - "1111.11111.1i City of M I AM I B E AC H s...,. .. , . .:.",„ ... � 11 „.,,. ...„... .....,., . . Baylink Light Rail Urban & Station Design .11!: ' !, i 1. . :: '.Miami Beach, Florida 1 �� 1. I l _1 . ` , 1 , RI :, .:'2 .4 . , .-+ 4 fil.ifilifl\1 _..., . = 4 .:: :,,,;.'....::::',.,:. .. „ . % ... , v, ( a _., ii„,:. - -- r - ._�-� —� BAYLINK r. —, 1111 .Alw -, 11 II t11 il., .;Illi _ , it 7 ., .or- liki4litSlibb._ -------"--------'--- -- � i \ _ E YOK /' -, 1. ...""." 1 .i% 1 i , ' ....;.:4 Client:Miami-Dade County Construction Cost:$400M Team Members: - Metropolitan Planning Start Date: 102002 Alfredo C. Sanchez Organization Completion: 11/2004 111 NW First Street, Suite 910 Description: B&A prepared the urban design analysis and the station area plans Miami, Florida 33128 and designs for the proposed light rail connection between downtown Miami and Wilson Fernandez Miami Beach. B&A carried out an analysis of the areas surrounding the stations, 305.375.4507 identifying potential linkages, architectural typologies of the different urban areas, wilson@miamidade.gov and developing design plans for the stations. 92 North Corridor Alternative Analysis & Station Area Design Miami-Dade& Broward Counti_es,s, Florida . - NI , i IrFir1 . , till I :i 1-1 .4 ft 1, AI • ' •* # T1 s..) 1•• .i.,;.t iff.17...fir,t •' i,e'.. -C •s . . 1 .111111-11111111 • _ es ..i. . _ .., . . I.J. .s 1 ,,Oh - IF 111, pp ist - .. r , -,:::) ') e..LI"--. - ' ....c.7. 00 tr. —' ' -. 7 i I"r 12 ':- ---.. -. *Ito :1,--, r-241., ... ...-.. - . • - . . ', .4:-. (-74pH.ci ... . a ' is. :71, : ' -- -' ii. rAr. : . • , : _ :,._.: . - . ,, le. _ -•-77,7:-,... -.._,- . _, liteb,,1-.,•il -... _ -fir—..'- III 111 "11111 VIII . 1. AIIII tina lar �� i 111 I... N . Client:Miami-Dade County Construction Cost:$800M Team Members: 12/1994 Alfredo C. Sanchez Start Dote: - Metropolitan Planning Organization Completion:07/1996 (planning, 111 NW First Street, Suite 910 engineering and architecture) Miami, Florida 33128 Description: B&A provided planning, engineering and architectural services for Wilson Fernandez the North Corridor Alternatives Analysis. The team evaluated public transportation 305.375.4507 alternatives (heavy&light rail, busway) in a north-south corridor in Dade County. wilson@miamidade.gov B&A performed preliminary engineering design services for the transit corridor. Working closely witthe h designsz sforAdvisory po eCommittee al(stations along ththe e proposed c, the firm forged consensus-driven NW 27th Avenue alignment. 93 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) Strategic Master Plan 2040 Miami, Florida . ..-.:I t_. _ _l. jl Legend - System Projects cib M3 MIC Development Parcel Dpa locks M4 A,rport %Palmer Lake Redevelopment Parcel IT Go .��,., 4SR112 Extension to HEFT Homestead SR 924 J Air Base Gratigny v.-.--- Truck Viaduct Extension to HEFT eMiami 0SR 838 Managed Lanes s ; Beach v Intermodal Projects r Doral W m Miami Beach Intermodal Center:I-195 e e Miami Beach Intermodal Center: '- m MacArthur Causeway " • d ®® I-195 11 Port Of Miami Intermodal Center • a I ® Doral Intermodal Center E , ' ami Ge me al 1-J95 West Kendall Intermodal Station Y I v ® Airport •• - _ 0.6" . - eV 40 13 Minor Projects 37th St.Bridge Connection Exit Improvements SR112 NW 42nd Ave and NW 36th St. ® HEFT Connection to Homestead Air Base Virginia SR924 Gratigny On-Off Ramp NW 67th 01 Key Ave Kendall e SR112 On-Off Ramp at NW 37th Ave s 878 SR836 On-Off Ramp at NW 97th Ave \ Q rr Exploratory Ideas US1 Reversible Lanes / Biscayne Bay e1 Water Taxi System Tamiami Miami Beach Congestion Management: ...Airport1-195 Miami Beach Congestion Management: MacArthur Causeway QPotential Development Parcel at 97th Ave es�.Potential Development Parcel at 87th Ave Existing MDX System 1,_ Current Proposed Projects Client:Miami-Dade Expressway Construction Cost:$4.6B Team Members: 3790 NW 21st Street Start Date:Fall 2014 Alfredo C. Sanchez, Miami, FL 33142 Completion: 12/2016 Joshua Rak Javier Rodriguez Executive Director Description: The MDX 2040 Strategic Master Plan proposes several system wide 305.637.3277 x 2218 projects with the goals of improving mobility by closing gaps in the system. The project jrodriguez@mdxway.com addresses the incorporation and integration of vehicle-evolving technologies with I modern transportation infrastructure, XT Lanes and will revolutionized the way people use vehicles and roads within Miami-Dade County. Intermodal centers are proposed and are vital to the development of the new XT Lanes providing greater travel options, enhance mobility and improve the quality of service and increase access to transportation choices in the Miami area. ha 94 CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS Chattanooga Passenger Rail Feasibility Study For the Chattanooga Hamilton County/North Georgia(CHCNGA)Transportation Planning Organization(TPO),CS provided on-call services that included TransCAD forecast modeling and ArcView support,air quality emissions analyses and policy support, intelligent transportation system(ITS)maintenance,congestion management systems(CMS)with travel time survey maintenance,transportation subarea studies,transit studies, public outreach materials,freight studies,and transportation planning support. Six task orders were completed, including TransCAD travel demand modeling,air quality analyses,and development of all three Conformity Determination Reports(CDRs)for the Chattanooga PM2.5 tri-state nonattainment area (Alabama,Georgia,and Tennessee). In addition, Cambridge Systematics developed a 2009 TransCAD travel demand model and conducted the corresponding air quality emissions analysis to assist with developing the State Implementation Plan(SIP) budget for the 2009 attainment year. CSalso provided speed and travel time data to support the Congestion Management System(CMS)update/speed study report. Lastly, Cambridge Systematics conducted the TransCAD modeling analysis to assist with determining the feasibility of presenting the Tennessee River Bridge Crossing as a pilot toll project in Hamilton County. 95 11 . Traffic Engineering 4 , • ', A • City of MIAMI BE AC H i PROJECT PROFILE Transportation Engineering and Planning Services Sarasota County, Florida The previously three-leg intersection at Honore Avenue and Bee Ridge Road in aient:Sarasota County Government Sarasota County had recently been reconfigured to add a fourth leg(Honore Avenue) in the north quadrant.A state-commissioned Project Development and Owner:Sarasota County Government Environment(PD&E)study of the Bee Ridge Road corridor from McIntosh Road to Reba Cline 1-75 completed in the year 1996 had suggested dual left turn lanes eastbound and 941-315-0773 westbound along Bee Ridge Road,augmented by right turn bays. Future Honore rcline@scgov.net Avenue to the south is planned for two lanes southbound,and northbound two Services Start Date:08/2013 left turn lanes and a right turn lane.Future Honore Avenue to the north isSOMOIS per;05/2017 designed,although it will ultimately carry four through lanes.The County then instigated a detailed study of the intersection to verify whether the Role:Prime recommended intersection improvements were necessary for future needs. Lochner is responsible for all aspects of the intersection study.Lochner is Total Project Cost overseeing the collection of 72 hours of video traffic counts(turning movements) $82,101.00 at the site to assess current traffic levels and operations. Lochner will then use the state's travel model to estimate the future(2038)traffic levels.The intersection will be modeled,using Synchro,under a no-build scenario to determine whether the current configuration would give an acceptable level of service under the forecasted traffic conditions.The proposed improvements to Bee Ridge Road will be taken into account during this analysis. Lochner will provide the results of its analysis to the County in a study report,together with recommendations,preliminary design concepts,and suggested implementation dates for any improvements found to be necessary.Lochner will provide a conceptual-level design alternative that shows the addition of northbound right turn storage lane. SERVICES • Traffic/Transportation Analysis • Traffic Forecasting/Modeling • Travel Demand • Transportation Planning Modeling/Forecasting • Transportation Operations • Traffic Impact Analysis/Study Analysis LOCHNER 97 PROJECT PROFILE VMS; 1-15 NB at Bangerter & I-215 EB at MP 6 Salt Lake County, Utah Client Utah Department of Transportation • • Owner. Utah Department of Transportation Steve Quinn • 801-965-4000 squinn@utah.gov Services Start Date:11/2016 . Services Completion Date:06/2017 Role: to {` • Construction Amount: .,_ • 60114 r-* • Utah Department of Transportation, Region 2 is continuing to improve the Traveler Information System for Freeway Operations in the Salt Lake City Metro area.The goals of this project were to improve safety and mobility in Salt Lake County by providing three fully functional,operable,and maintainable VMS at key locations.Included in this plan are three additional Variable Message Signs(VMS) in Salt County. Lochner was selected to design the three Variable Message Signs to be placed on EB 1-215 prior to the 6200 South/3000 East-Exit 6(Knudsen's Corner), NB 1-15 North of Bangerter Hwy,and WB SR-201 near Redwood Road. Design services included identification of the final location of each sign,ATMS design,structure design,survey,roadway design,QA/QC of designs and processes,attendance at project meetings,and the preparation of a complete federally compliant advertising package.All work will be performed in compliance with UDOT and Federal standards. SERVICES • Advanced Traffic Management • Intelligent Transportation System • Sign Structure Design System(ATMS)Planning/Design Planning/Design LOCHNER 98 PROJECT PROFILE On-Call Traffic Engineering Salina, Kansas To date the on-call contract with the City of Salina has included: Client:City of Salina • Pedestrian route study at Hageman Avenue and Broadway Boulevard Owner:City of Salina • Traffic study at Broadway Boulevard and Republic Avenue Kent Johnson • Bike path report for Schilling Road between Ohio Street and South 9th 785-309-5725 Street Kent.Johnson@Salina.org • • Conduct traffic counts at the intersections of Crawford and Broadway as Services Start Date:03/2007 • well as Crawford and Ohio Services Completion Date: 10/2009 • • Perform traffic studies at miscellaneous intersections throughout town to study items like stop control,speed limits,traffic signals. Role: • Study of the Broadway medians between State Street and Cloud Street. • Traffic study at the intersection of Markley and Magnolia. Total Project Cost: $22,406 • SERVICES • Traffic Circulation Study • Traffic/Transportation Analysis • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design LOCHNER 99 PROJECT PROFILE 2008 Traffic Engineering Services Shoreline, Washington Lochner is responsible for providing on-call traffic engineering services that Client:City of Shoreline provide immediate response to the City of Shoreline's needs in responding to high priority traffic safety projects,such as signal warrant analysis,traffic control Reference: signing,and traffic safety improvements. The Lochner team will prepare all Rich Meredith signing,striping,and delineation for each traffic control operation. Signing and City of Seattle illumination designs will be done in the context of the current standards for 206-733-9936 downtown Issaquah. rich.meredith@seattle.gov Servlas Start The Lochner team will prepare illumination,signing and striping plans in Com Date:07/2008 Services Completion Date:01/2009 accordance with City,WSDOT,and MUTCD standards. Detailed traffic control plans will be prepared to accommodate each phase of the project,and Role:Prime construction sequencing will be developed to accommodate existing traffic. Among other projects,new traffic signals are being designed and integrated with Total Project Cost: the City's traffic control system. Signalization upgrades and additions will be $50,000.00 incorporated into the geometric design revisions and operations will be verified to determine final design for storage lengths and timing. SERVICES • Alternatives Development and • Signal Design • Lighting Design Analysis • Inter-Agency Coordination • Public Outreach/Involvement • Continuous Flow Intersection • Signing Design (CFI) Design • Cost Estimate Development • Traffic Forecasting/Modeling LOCHNER 100 PROJECT PROFILE 1 Beckham Avenue Traffic Signal Optimization Study Tyler, Texas Lochner was selected to evaluate and design three—AM,noon,and PM—signal Client:City of Tyler timing plans for efficient system-wide traffic operations and improved traffic progression within the Beckham Avenue and Fifth Street subsystems in the City of Services Start Date:1/2005 Tyler,Texas. Services Completion Date:05/2006 Lochner began this project by obtaining the peak hour traffic counts,24-hour Role:Prime traffic counts,and existing traffic signal timing and phasing from the City's Traffic Engineering department.Through application of aerial photographs and field investigation Lochner verified the existing lane geometry at each of the subsystem intersections.Using the Synchro 6.0 software,Lochner built the project's existing conditions,or base models. Lochner conducted travel time and delay surveys of the existing conditions via the floating car method to use during the project's final stages.The survey results were used to model the travel speeds in the signal coordination analysis. These also provided a comparison of the measure of effectiveness between the existing traffic conditions and coordinated traffic conditions. Next,Lochner utilized the Synchro 6.0 software to prepare the three signal timing plans.Using the base models previously created,Lochner first determined which signals should be included in the subsystems.The operation of each signal must be sufficiently compatible with the adjacent signals for coordinated operation to be effective. For this project no signals were excluded from the subsystems.The next steps were to determine an appropriate cycle length for the subsystems,establish an offset time for each signal,and establish timing splits for each signal. Once the timing plans were developed,they were pre-tested through the use of the animated traffic simulation program, Simtraffic. Lochner utilized the 24-hour traffic counts to determine the appropriate times of day to activate each of the timing plans. The final step involved uploading the Synchro output directly into the traffic signal controller in the field.Typically,the timing plans developed based on office analysis need to be field adjusted to reflect actual field conditions more precisely.The fine tuning generally consists of adjusting the time of day when each plan is operating,the individual intersection offsets,and the intersection splits. I adjusted these parameters by observing each signal during the plans'times. Once satisfactory results were reached,Lochner again conducted travel time and delay survey runs to document the changes in measures of effectiveness. Finally,the final report was compiled summarizing the results of the travel time comparison along with all the field collected data,analysis procedure,and final timing plans. SERVICES • Traffic Signal Coordination LOCHNER 101 Districtwide Traffic Operations & Safe Studies Consultant Service MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: The general purpose of this contract is to provide traffic engineering services through the development of 16\..4. irk i "' various traffic operations studies that will be identified for • ...... ..:11: 171:. II., _4.. .41. ,Eintersections, arterial, etc. and related improvement - ' recommendations and evaluations __, 1.. ...,....: i . -5.• �: Client: 0 worr`als" Florida Department of Transportation 4 �.+r District 6 r W ,,- AV' ..- II " !AIN, . \ Address: 1000 NW 111 Avenue Miami, FL 33172 Services Provided: Contact: • Qualitative Assessments Ramon Sierra Serra • Intersection analysis • Arterial Analysis Phone: 305-470-5336 -MacArthur Cswy/5 St Corridor - Indian Creek Dr/Harding Ave Corridor Email: Ramon.Sierra@dot.state.fl.us • Left Turn Phase Warrant Analysis Delay • Studies Project Dates: Ongoing • Crash Analysis • Level of Service Analysis Project Fee: • Speed Zone Studies $500,000 • Pedestrian Studies • Signal Warrant Analysis �sTR/(• IllMI ti*`• ,2 HT1 E T R I C \ ENGINEERING 102 Districtwide Traffic Operations Support Services MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: This task work order basis contract has been utilized to develop �-- —_ travel time thresholds and monitor travel times for Palmetto Expressway Express Lanes project. A"mobility incentive" is --- � � provided for Construction Team to encourage achievement of highest travel time performance during the construction. A a.. penalty is assessed against the "mobility incentive"when the travel times along the corridor exceeds the travel time thresholds. Travel time data is tracked in real itme during the construction by Bluetooth/WiFi vehicle detection devides. These devices utilize wireless network equiment to transfer data from the devices to a central server where the data is processed. Travel time reports are provided to the Construction Team on a two-day interval. A Walk— monthly summary of penalties against the"mobility incentive" is also prepared and distributed. Grid power from the sign luminaires is utilized for providing power to all the travel time Services Provided: data collection stations • Develop travel time thresholds and monitor travel times for Palmetto Expressway Express Lanes Project Client: • Track data in real time Florida Department of Transportation • Provide travel time reports District 6 s Monthly summary of penalties against the"Mobility Address: Incentive" 1000 NW 111 Avenue Miami, FL 33172 Contact: Jacques Defrant, PE Phone: 305-470-5385 Email: Jacques.Defrant@dot.state.fl.us Project Dates: Ongoing Project Fee: $800,000 ZC,'��,,2 METRIC "E ENGINEERING 103 12. Landscape - p • - , „ I 141 ,'z' -r -7-, ‘ . - 111;.A____,.11 ,,,,. . '11• 41.--Ak561.0,. .sesworiemeNsam __— , , City of M I AM I B E AC H ..., ‘. . ..... - , . .. . - . ' East Atlantic Boulevard Streetscape Improvements Pompano Beach, Florida . t it f r ITf _I 'fes • 1 ' S- ! 5i� 1 I, 1 ? I j y,. Y j L r t aJY I rrw.,!_.. . -- f albse- . i — - --"""I' x,--:e:1111:. .- rtry ' rs —• t• • Client:City of Pompano Beach Construction Cost:$1.3 Million CRA 100 W. Atlantic Boulevard Completion:2013 Room 33060 276 Pompano Beach, FL Description:B&A the firm was then selected to develop a complete streetscape program for Horacio Danovich the City's primary gateway to the beach.The primary goal for the redesign was to create a RACEngineer pedestrian-friendly environment less dominated by the automobile.B&A landscape architects Pompano Beach 954-786.7834 and engineers, reduced the number of traffic lanes, substantially increased the sidewalk Horacio.Danovich@copbfl .com widths and incorporated parallel parking along both sides of the street.The wider sidewalks, shaded by canopy trees and lined with benches, encourage pedestrian traffic for the retail uses and allows for the introduction of outdoor cafes. ba 105 Arlen House Streetscape Sunny Isles Beach, Florida nYi h ._ 1( IAhr! ' I r., fes!^ .• i 'y�+ � - P .4.` Ilrr -, - ` it. i*slig yl Q., _.� i _ ,y � `.�i—L ' is , - - , ',,(tilir\-. i - 'iLu -. / ' _ .\ 1 ` r • ,k: te...i....3.,_:.e,m,......,„.,,...., _,.....,,.. . ....-4. ,. , Client: City of Sunny Isles Beach Construction Cost:$740,800 Bill Evans 18070 Collins Avenue Sunny Completion:2014 Isles Beach, FL 33160 Description: Working for the City of Sunny Isles Beach, B&A was requested to upgrade the existing ROW conditions to compliment other redeveloped arecs of Collins Avenue.The scope of improvements includes an 8' wide specialty paver sidewalk with waving bands of concrete pavers, a new six foot tall buffer/retaining wall, decorative stone columns, a vehicular gate system for an adjacent private condominium parking area, a bus shelter, landscaping, landscape lighting and a complete upgraded irrigation system. ea 106 NW 107 Avenue Streetscape Improvements Doral, Florida �Y t ' q,, ' � �, , - v --_____ - ,\ N ,1 . l%i `' { -4 , . i s}\: ,,, ulV j 1. i. 1 �` l V ..;' -If c' IMP" ' ,, r, . - ' , . ,, �� r3 1 . .,. ...r ieglame...,....... - Eta oiiii 4 itilkiiir, . , , ab IP' 1 ;t•• - r Client:City of Doral Construction Cost:$800000 Eric Carpenter 8300 NW 53rd Street Completion:2010 City of Doral, 33166, Florida 305.593.6740 Description: B&A was retained to provide design and construction services consisting of landscaping, irrigation and lighting for two miles of roadway median on NW 107th Avenue,extending from NW 58th Eric.Carpenter@ciryofdoral.com Street to NW 90th Street in the City of Doral. The landscaped median contains a mix of tropical palms,shade and flowering trees,and other plant material that provide a pleasant environment for this major thoroughfare. New LED fixtures along the two-mile stretch of median create an aesthetically pleasing and safe nighttime driving experience. The project was designed in accordance with FDOT standards. ba 107 Sunset Harbor Drive Miami, Florida ft ,+ . . .11 ,IAL-Lai _ _ 44-. . ..-,2- --'-'7-----:-.- ' .. • - 1' �1• rI ,-.c / /I . ii ` $ M _ otiii... i r -7 a F-'•tryt - r 2 ...4.'. ' , j'.i Y•r, ¢ � 11&.-. -a Client:City of Miami Beach Description: B&A was commissioned to renovate a City of Miami Beach streetscape 1700 Convention Center Drive, in conjunction with a new residential development. The project includes complete Miami Beach, FL 33139, reconstruction of a 'h mile of road and beautification thereof including pre-pavement, Ph. 305.673.7000 sidewalks, medians, landscaping and lighting as well as utilities which included installation of a new 20-inch diameter water main, new drainage system and underground electrical work. B&A provided architectural, landscape architectural and civil engineering services. A unique characteristic of this project entailed grading required to provide subterraneous parking. The residential development comprises of a waterfront townhouse project on Miami Beach distinguished by landscaping that preserves privacy and enhances the pedestrian environment. ba 108 13 . Survey_ 11/4 City of M I AM I BEACH Y M.G. VERA • MGV Relevant Project Descriptions &ASSOCIATES,Inc. SR 826 Palmetto Expressway from East of NW67th Avenue to East of NW 57th Avenue (Segment 3) - (MP 18.117 /toMP19.08) Client: FDOT, D6 Client Address: 1000 NW 111' Avenue, Miami, FL 33172 Sub Consultant to: TRACE Consultants, Inc. Contact: Frank Panellas, PE Contact No.: 305-338-1509 Contact Email: jfpanellastraceci.com Duration: 11/2016 thru Present (3/28/19) Location: Miami-Dade County, Florida Cost: $91,122.61 Project Length: 1 mile Project Description: The primary purpose of this project is to relieve congestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity, enhance safety by addressing operational, structural and functional deficiencies and provide additional travel options. These improvements consist of the addition of express lanes, auxiliary lanes, reconstruction of the mainline and improvements to the existing interchanges. MGV is responsible for the following design survey tasks: 1.) Using the existing survey control, establish horizontal and vertical project network controls and re-set/add monuments that have been destroyed on project network control sheets; 2.)Extend the existing Topographic and DTM Survey; 3.) Planimetrics- locating approximately 600 trees along the main line of SR 826 / Palmetto Expressway; 4.) Check Cross Sections; 5.) A Drainage Survey to be performed along NW 57th Ave; and 6.) Geotechnical Support- approximately 250 test holes will be located with horizontal and vertical values. Reconstruction of SR Al A (South Roosevelt Boulevard) in the City of Key West Client: FDOT, D6 Client Address: 1000 NW 111thAvenue, Miami, FL 33172 Sub Consultant to: Metric Engineering Contact: Manuel A. Sauleda, PE Contact No. 305-235-5098, Ext. 117 Contact Email: msalueda(c�metricenq.com Duration: 04/2014 thru 04/2017 Location: Monroe County, Florida Cost: $138,797.21 Project Length: 2.1 miles Project Description: MGV prepared a complete Design survey which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, survey baseline and right of way, the creation of Topographic surveys and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D), Cross-Sections, Outfall Survey / Canal Soundings, Drainage Survey, Sectional Survey, Subdivision Locations for Survey Baseline & Right of Way Lines, Right of Way Mapping, preparation of CADD and Sheet files, Parcel Sketches, Legal Descriptions, and Title Search Report. Cross Town Parkway Segment 1 from Manth Lane to USI Client: City of Port Saint Lucie Sub Consultant to: RS&H, Inc. Sub Consultant Address: 10748 Deerwood Park Boulevard South, Jacksonville, FL 32256 Contact: Rachel Back, PE, CFM Contact No.: 904-256-2444 Contact Email: rachel.back@rsandh.com Duration: 03/2015 thru 04/2016 Location: St. Lucie County, Florida Cost: $183,080 (Survey Services: $133,080.00 & SUE Services: $50,000.00) 110 Project Length: 2.5 miles M.G. VERA Project Description: MGV prepared a complete Design survey which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical (NAVD &ASSOCIATES,Inc. 88) control networks, the creation of Topographic surveys and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D) in 3D laser scanning, perform cross sections, aerial targets, subdivision location (up to 100, as required), and geotechnical support. PD&E Study for Widening Sawgrass from South of US 441 to West of Powerline Road Client: Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Client Address: Turkey Lake Service Plaza, Milepost 263. Ocoee, FL 34761 Sub Consultant to: The Corradino Group, Inc. Contact: Mike Ciscar, PE Contact No.: 305-594-0735 Contact Email: mcisarcorradino.com Duration: 05/2016 thru Present Location: Broward County, Florida Cost: $581,822.00 Project Length: 4 miles Project Description: MGV is responsible for preparing a complete Design survey, which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, the creation of Topographic surveys and Digital Terrain Model, and provide subsurface utility engineering services (SUE). Turnpike Widening Atlantic to Boynton Beach Boulevard Client: FDOT, D4 Client Address: 3400 West Commercial Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Sub Consultant to: GAI Consultants, Inc. Contact: John Saunders, PE Contact No.: 321-319-3089 Contact Email: i.saunders@gaiconsultants.com Duration: 01/2016 thru Present (Est. end date 07/2019) Location: Palm Beach County, Florida Cost: $262,847.00 Project Length: 4.9 miles Project Description: MGV was responsible for providing a Design Survey consisting of the following deliverables: the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, Survey Baseline and Right of Way Lines, Aerial Targets, creation of Topographic survey and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D), Roadway Cross-Sections/Profiles, Bridge Survey, Channel Survey, and Pond Site Survey, and Project Network Control Sheets. Topographic Survey NW 82-1 Ave. from NW 27 St. to NW 33rd St. Client: City of Doral Sub Consultant to: Gannett Fleming, Inc. Sub Consultant Address: 7300 Corporate Center Drive, #701, Miami, FL 33126 Contact: Alina Fernandez, PE Contact No. 786-845-9540, Ext. 5814 Contact Email: afernandezqfnet.com Duration: 06/2016 thru 04/2017 Location: Miami-Dade County, Florida Cost: $24,859.75 Project Length: N/A -Task Work Order Based Project Description: MGV was responsible for providing a Design Survey consisting of the following deliverables: the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, Survey Baseline and Subdivision Locations for Survey Baselines and Right of Way Lines, creation of Topographic survey and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D), Drainage Survey, Parcel Sketches and Legal Descriptions, and Title Search Report. MGV also performed subsurface utility services, including test holes locations. 111 14. Public Involvement Publoc 410 Nk/L"Ilig Nf�f{I� ip4 41114:ft Project Study Group 1(° * City of MIAMI BE AC H IAGBE consulting services, inc. Miami-Dade Water& Sewer: 42" Water Transmission Main between Biscayne Boulevard NE 5th Street to Port of Miami: Parson Brinkerhoff/WSP contracted MAGBE to provide public involvement services City of Miami Beach- Central Bayshore South Flood Risk: Irela Bague, MAGBE's Director of Government Affairs provided support for the coordination and planning of the open house hosted for the residents of Central Bayshore South. March 2017 —April 2017. Client Reference, Susanna Torriente, (305) 673-7000 , ext. 6486, SusanneTorriente@miamibeachfl.gov Village of Key Biscayne Sea Level Rise Adaptation & Risk Assessment: Irela Bague, MAGBE's Director of Government Affairs was the lead on the project tasked to plan, coordinate, conduct and moderate (2) public town hall style meetings present the results of a resident survey, review the final flood projections and adaptation plan, and engaged in planning for next steps with residents and the Village. July 2016 — January 2017. Client Reference: Key Biscayne Community Foundation, Rumya Sundaram, rumya@keybiscaynefoundation.org Miami-Dade County Public Works: Design Services for Roadway Improvements to NW 58th Street in Doral, Florida, SRS Engineering contracted MAGBE to provide public involvement services. Client Reference: Ignacio Serralta, (305) 662-8887, ignacio@srs- corp.com Miami-Dade Science Museum Construction Project: Suffolk Construction contracted MAGBE to provide research and coordination for the planning of a Certified CSBE matchmaking event to inform local contractors of construction opportunities available to small firms. July 2012 to September 2012 Client Reference: Suffolk: Donald Hergenreder,305-374-1107 • Miami-Dade MPO: 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Study— Jacobs Engineering Group contracted MAGBE to provide assistance with the 2040 Transportation Plan Study the scope consisted of providing the MPO with innovative marketing campaign options to encourage the general public to use Miami-Dade Transit. January 2012 to June 2012 Client Reference: Jacobs Engineering Group: Linda Mifsud, 954-246-1412 • City of Miami Marlins Stadium Site Parking- MAGBE partnered with Suffolk Construction as to serve as project PIO and Community Liaison for the Marlins Stadium Site Parking project. MAGBE provided research, communication vehicles and coordinated outreach events for local DBE's and SBE's certified firms in Miami-Dade County. January 2010 to August 2011 Client Reference: Suffolk: Tim Sterling, 305-374-1107 or City of Miami CIP Director-305-416- 1286 • Camillus House New Development Project— MAGBE partnered with Coastal Construction to assist with the Camillus House construction project. MAGBE developed a comprehensive outreach program, coordinated and conducted a local Job Fair to promote employment opportunities to individuals within a 5 mile radius of the construction site in accordance to Overtown CRA requirements. Over 25 jobs were created as a result of the Camillus Overtown Job Fair. February 2010 to April 2011 Client Reference: Coastal Construction: Steve Silverman, 305-559-4900 113 nAGBE Miami-Dade MPO: GPC IV-07 - Near Term Plan for Improved Transportation Services— Jacobs Engineering Group contracted MAGBE to provide assistance with the 2040 Transportation Plan Study the scope consisted of providing the MPO with innovative marketing campaign options to encourage the general public to use Miami-Dade Transit. April 2010 to October 2010 Client Reference: Jacobs Engineering Group, 954-246-1247 ❑ City of Miami North Bayshore Drive Drainage Improvement Project- MAGBE served as project PIO, provided communications and conducted public meetings with area residents and businesses with regards to project schedule and traffic impacts. March 2009 to October 2009 Client Reference: PBS & J Humberto Alonso, 305-392-7275 or City of Miami CIP/PIO 305-416- 1286 ❑ FDOT District 6-Miscellaneous District Wide Public Involvement Consultant Services. Community Awareness Contract # 250673-1-32-Public Involvement Sub consultant providing support and coordination for data research, coordination of governmental briefings, public meeting and public communication services and mailings. From 2007 to 2010CIient Reference: Maribel Lena, P.E., FDOT Project Manager FDOT District VI. FDOT (305)470-5208 J Miami Dade County Publics Work Department- NW 7 Avenue Corridor Reversible Lane Study (PDE) MAGBE served as Public Involvement Coordinator for a feasibility study for roadway improvements to the NW 7th Avenue Corridor. The PD&E Study is an integrated effort involving engineering analysis and environmental evaluation for the design of a reversible lane. MAGBE provided support and coordination for data research, coordination of governmental briefings, public meetings and public communication services and mailings. All accomplished within the context of a pro-active and continuous public participation program. April 2007 to August 2008 Client Reference: Sven Weydahl, P.E. Director, Production Management. BHA Inc. (954) 334- 2745Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization-Kendall Corridor Alternatives Analysis ;] City of Miami-Orange Bowl Redevelopment Study- MAGBE was selected by Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. as the Public Involvement consultant. MGABE coordinated all communications and public meetings for City of Miami area residents, businesses and organizations located near and around the Orange Bowl community. From 2006 to 2007 Client Reference: John Paccione, Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. (312) 228-2626 FDOT- District 6(PD&E Study) SR5/Brickell Avenue Corridor from SE.25th Road to SE.4th Street. MAGBE served as PIO for a feasibility study to provide roadway improvements for Brickell Avenue. The PD&E Study is an integrate effort involving engineering analysis and environmental evaluation, MAGBE provided support and coordination for data research, coordination of governmental briefings, public meetings and public communication services and mailings. All accomplished within the context of a pro-active and continuous public participation program. March 2005 to October 2006 Client Reference: FDOT PD & E Project Manager FDOT District VI. FDOT (305)470-5208 114 Maggie Bruno ,f Maggie Bruno has more than 20 years of working with both public sector and private sector clients in the transportation industry encompassing a myriad of disciplines in communications, media relations, public information and project management. She has extensive experience in developing and managing public information / communication programs, forming corporate partnerships, consensus building, interagency collaboration, community outreach, special event planning, high profile campaigns and crisis management. Ms. Bruno has provided consultant communication services to public sector clients in South Florida including the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Six and District Four, Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. She is able to manage many projects and tasks successfully to meet established deadlines. As a long-time South Florida resident, she has worked extensively with local media and has developed strong working relationships with local officials, civic organizations and special interest groups throughout the tri- county area. Yasir Mercado Yasir Mercado is a communications professional with 10 years of experience working ers with public and private sector clients. She is a fully bilingual (English/Spanish) Miami resident with exceptional interpersonal skills who is able to build strong professional relationships with her clients, stakeholders and various groups and organizations. She is highly organized and detail oriented. Ms. Mercado is adept at developing and implementing processes and procedures to achieve established goals and can manage multiple tasks and projects simultaneously while maintaining a high level of performance and meeting established deadlines. She has assisted with Community Awareness Plan (CAP) and Public Involvement Plan (PIP) development and prepared project materials using plain language, AP Style and agency guidelines for style and content. Ms. Mercado has extensive experience in directing and coordinating all communication efforts from start to finish. She prepares and presents project information to stakeholders, elected officials, homeowner associations, business owners, special interest groups and community groups. She is responsible for coordinating and facilitating all public meetings, creating and maintaining issues logs, stakeholder and elected official databases and project website pages. She has served on major governmental, municipal and statewide contracts including City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects, FDOT District Six Miscellaneous Districtwide, FDOT District Six, Public Communication Programs & Special Projects, and FDOT District Six SR 826/Palmetto Expressway and SR 836/Dolphin Expressway Interchange. ACE PRG projects: • FDOT District Four, 1-595 Express Corridor Improvements Project - Broward County, FL (2009 — 2014) • 1-75 Express Lanes— Segment E - Broward County, FL (2013— 2015) Staff experience/projects (with different firm): • City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects - Miami Beach, FL (2015 — 2016) • FDOT District Six, Public Communications & Special Projects (Drive Safe 95 Express) - Miami, Florida — (2015 — 2016) • FDOT District Six, Miscellaneous Districtwide - Miami, FL (2015-2016) • FDOT District Six, SR 5/US 1/South Dixie Highway Safety Design Projects — Miami, FL (2015) • FDOT District Four— Various PD&Es 115 PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUP ACE Public Relations Group, LW (ACE PRG) is a Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)firm, with a fully operational office in Hollywood, Florida, and a team of bilingual (English/Spanish) professionals based locally in Miami-Dade County. ACE PRG provides marketing, public relations and public involvement services to government agencies, municipalities, and private organizations. Our three principles for successfully implementing effective public involvement programs include raising AWARENESS, sharing information through multiple COMMUNICATION channels and providing EDUCATION to our targeted audience. Thus, building trust through two-way communications. The ACE team has been strategically assembled to provide the City of Miami Beach a seasoned and reputable staff with proven experience on major transportation projects. We have a deep understanding of the City of Miami Beach operations and management. Our staff brings extensive experience in South Florida including overseeing the Public Involvement efforts for Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) District Four 1-595 Express Lanes Corridor Improvements Project, the largest Public, Private, Partnership (P3) project in the State of Florida. In addition, we have also provided community outreach and public involvement services for the City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects, the Florida Department of Transportation, District Four and District Six, and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. Organization, research, planning and a deep understanding of the affected public(s) are critical to developing and implementing a meaningful public involvement strategy. Our team's approach on all projects — regardless how large or small — includes developing clearly-defined, project- specific goals, identifying potential issues, identifying the target public, and identifying the most effective tools and techniques to successfully engage that audience. Our personnel have a broad experience in all aspects of public involvement, public hearing/public meeting coordination, government relations, media relations, multi-media development, special events coordination, and documentation and database management. Our staff is experienced in providing community outreach services for various projects that include: water main improvements, gravity sewer system improvements, stormwater drainage system improvements, roadway reconstruction and streetscape improvements, property harmonization, and construction for bike lanes, multi-use paths and sidewalks. Our staff also has experience with issues affecting urban development/ redevelopment and environmentally sensitive environments with significant land use constraints. Successful outreach efforts also involve the combination of traditional media and online resources tools to encourage interaction from the target segments within a population. Social media is now the preferred method for public comment. We maximize its use to provide up-to-the-minute updates to team members and essential project information to the public. Our team utilizes the latest cost-saving innovations and initiatives that can be used in the public information process such as webcasting public meetings,video news releases,dash cam experience,text messaging, email blasts, and social media blogging. We communicate technical information and complex issues to the public in Plain Language so they can understand the project and how it may affect them. AWARENESS I COMMUNICATION I EDUCATION www.aceprq.com 116 15. Environmental Sustainable Deueloprrent Soda) Nunn 9 City of M I AM I BEAC H• r s 1 .. r,, 1-75 ase II ITS Installation Environmental Permitting Sup • • of ALACHUA,COLUMBIA AND HAMILTON COUNTIES FLORIDA Project Description: This 87 mile ITS project involves two sets of plans, both within the • same project limits from SR 24 in Alachua County to the Florida/ Georgia state line. Phase 1 involved the design of a fiber/conduit backbone communication system installation. A conduit duct bank containing a 96 strand fiber optic cable was installed on the x "ww y. _, ;�,., northbound side for the entire length of the project along with approximately 360 electric/ITS pull boxes. 189 fiber optic pull • boxes. 195 fiber optic splice vaults, one master hub, one power service pole. and two ground mount transformers. Phase 2 involved the design of the field equipment communication • devices. including 24 full-size. walk-in, color DMS as well as • CCTV, vehicle detectors and deployment. A wetland delineation and listed species/gopher tortoise survey was conducted along the north and southbound sides of the roadway in support of environmental permitting requirements. State General Permit and USACE Nationwide Permit verifications were obtained to *' authorize minor wetland/OSW alterations. aaue.. ice' Client: Florida Department of Transportation -District 2 w - - Address: . 1109 South Marion Avenue Lake City, FL 32025 • w.` Contact: ' . Peter Vega or Eric Shimer � F .v/•bt • tiY '< �1' Phone: 904-360-5463 Services Provided: Email: • FDOT and agency coordination eric.shimer@dot.state.fl.us • 87 miles of interstate highway ITS design Project Dates: • Natural/regulated resource survey 2014-2016 • Corridor wetland delineation Project Fee: • GPS data collection $2.1M • GIS analysis of collected line/point data • Preparation of permit applications to FDEP and USACE �E TR/ Im �, � -1*W4? METRIC E ENGINEERING 118 Statewi • e Arborist Services for Vegetation Management Permitt' 0 . FLORIDA Project Description: our fr ..___. ._,...._ _. ,_. This contract provides active support to FDOT's Central Office for K - t • - the Statewide Vegetation Management Permitting Program. Services include vegetation evaluations within FDOT :, right of way to determine the specifications and value of regulated . �; .,, : vegetation. Work also includes evaluation of submitted ' applications, vegetation management plan review, and �. preparation of summary memorandums for client review. Metric = i. evaluates each tree on site and determines overall - health/replacement value in order to explore potential vegetation :Igigifirf. .' _ _:_} '` management alternatives to preserve as many trees as possible and ensure the health and integrity of Florida ecosystems. All , proposed omanagement sfo compliance withvegetatiStaten Statutes and program activities requirements au r necessitating that Metric work directly with other arborists, ...- landscape architects, and local business owners. FDOT relies on >a ti- .-.4, the discretion, expertise, and recommendations provided by Metric's staff and has re-awarded and extended Metric's contract through June 2018 based on excellent performance. Services Provided: Client: • Review Vegetation Management Applications Florida Department of Transportation submitted under 479.106 F.S. Central Office • Conduct site inspections statewide, including Address: Leon, Jefferson, and Gadsden Counties as well 605 Suwannee Street as the City of Tallahassee Tallanhassee, FL 32399 • Evaluate submitted vegetation maintenance Contact: plans Moms Pigott • Provide tree removal recommendations Phone: • Ensure compliance with State Statutes and 8504144574 FDOT permit requirements Email: • Determine the size, species, quality, and Morris.Pigott@dot.state.fl.us appraised value of existing vegetation, particularly trees Project Dates: Ongoing • Generate GIS maps depicting permit area and tree locations; Develop summary memorandums Project Fee: to document findings. $200,000 • Review appraisals of illegal vegetation management ��S TR,� • Provide expert witness testimony at m W ` � administrative hearings tic`' 2 METRIC EL ENGINEERING 119 SR 408 Eastern Extension PD&E Study ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: -0110.1111111111.1.1111111111111..— SEIR for a 7-mile eastern extension in Orange County. This ,_� project is the first phase of a larger regional vision to extend log SR 408 to eventually connect to 1-95 and the Brevard County _ ��� coastal cities. Alternatives include a new toll-road corridor with ' — - four major interchanges and a new crossing of the • ` r, 4 > Econlockhatchee River, posing substantial social and _4 1' .• r ., environmental concerns t /yI ,-„- Client: y �.�r • Central Florida Expressway Authority > ' • 40`"•.;"7;.- Address: � ... . 4974 Orl Tower Rd. Orlando, FL 32807 Services Provided: • Prime Contractor Overseeing All Aspects of Project Contact: Glenn Pressimone, PE • Engineering and project development Project Manager • Public Meetings and Coordination Phone: • Socio-cultural Impacts Evaluation 407-690-5321 including low-income/minority community disruption Email: special populations glenn.pressimone@cfxway.com • Impacts to Listed Species, Wetlands, Outstanding Florida Water... Project Dates: • Environmental Documents Ongoing SEIR, CSER, NRE, NSR... • Mitigation Planning and Coordination Project Fee: including impacts to SJRWMD Riparian $1.3M Habitat Protection Zone 1GmM E T R I C 'NEE- ENGINEERING 120 CR 510 PD&E Study from CR 512 to 58 Avenue INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA - . �. Project Description: Project Development& Environment(PD&E) Studies (CAT EX • Type II) (5.3 miles)to improve the capacity along CR 510 from CR 512 to 58th Avenue by widening from two to four lanes and 1,4 '�+ • r - • implementing a raised median. CR 512 currenity serves as the 4.r •. main artery in northern Indian River County connecting I-95 to • ` US 1 and A1A. >i;.:: _ ""'I!• d Client: Florida Department of Transportation District 4 - • . Address: 3400 West Commercial Blvd. Services Provided: Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 • Developing Environmental Documents (ESBA, WER, Contact: NSR, CSER, Section 4(f), CatEx Type II) Maria Formoso, PE • Conduct Nest Surveys for the Federal Listed Caracara Project Manager • Design Traffic Technical Memorandum (DTTM) Phone: 954-777-4677 • Noise Data Collection Email: • Prime Overseeing All Aspects of PD&E Study Maria.Formoso@dot.state.fl.us • Host public meetings Project Dates: • Extensive Coordination with SJRWM and Water Ongoing Control Districts ▪ Traffic Studies Project Fee: $1.3M Ill ticr„2 METRIC ME ENGINEERING 121 16. Geotechnical �1 City of 1 M I AM I B E AC H ice�. X:` ;r 5 .2 Lierra .n SOUTH FLORIDA Similar Project Experience SR-997 (Krome Avenue) from SR-941Kendall Drive to SR-90/SW 8 Street, Miami-Dade County, Florida. TSF provided geotechnical engineering services for the project which consists of the realignment of Krome Avenue from SR 94 (Kendall Drive) to SR 90 (Tamiami Trail) in Miami, Florida. The project is approximately 5 miles long. The improvements include the realignment of the existing roadway. The purpose of the study was to provide geotechnical input to the design team to assist in evaluation of the merits of the roadway improvements. Field work included auger borings and muck probes. Reviewed readily available published topographic and soils information obtained from the"Soil Survey of Miami-Dade County, Florida" published by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS). Performed visual inspection of soil samples and laboratory testing to establish the soil properties along the roadway alignment. Utilities, including a 30-inch force main and water main, which were to remain in place, were factored into geotechnical recommendations and proposed options. Geotechnical recommendations included the discussion of various options such as surcharge, reinforced soil platform, geo-synthetic, demucking and soil mixing. TSF also provided geotechnical recommendations involving permanent cut/fill slopes, excavations, groundwater control, pavement design, and on site soil suitability. TSF is currently providing construction support services including evaluation of surcharge settlement. 1-75 Express Lanes — Segment A/B from NW 170 Street to South of Miramar Parkway, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, Florida. Performed a geotechnical study for the design and construction of Segments A&B of the 1-75 Express Lanes Project which extend from just north of NW 170th Street in Miami-Dade County at milepost 3.485 to approximately 2.400 feet south of Miramar Parkway in Broward County at milepost 1.080.for a total distance of approximately 3.1 miles.The project also includes reconstruction,widening,and milling and resurfacing of the HEFT mainline from 1.45 miles south to 1.13 miles north of 1-75 to accommodate the Express Lanes Median to Median Direct Connect between 1-75 and the HEFT,as well as other interchange ramp connections.This corridor includes fourteen(14)bridge structures,several associated MSE Walls, about 20,000 linear feet of sound walls, Toil Gantries. CCTV poles, High Mast Light Poles, and Overhead Sign Structures. Provided pile design for bridges, and design parameters for sound walls, poles. and sign structures. Currently providing pile driving inspections and auger cast pile inspections for sound walls, and foundation certifications for bridges and sound walls. 1-95 Express Lanes in Broward and Miami-Dade Counties (Design-Build) from the Golden Glades in Miami-Dade County to Broward Boulevard in Broward County. The project consisted of the Extension the High Occupancy Toll Express lanes from northern Miami-Dade County north 13 miles to Fort Lauderdale. The project included installing Intelligent Transportation System components; modifying the Ives Dairy Road interchange; bridge widening at specific locations and installing new noise barrier walls at locations between Hollywood Blvd and Taft Street.TSF performed geotechnical study for roadway widening. bridge widening,overhead signs, MSE walls,toll equipment gallantries and buildings. During construction TSF provided pile driving inspection and foundation certification. Bridge over FPL Canal Discharge, Port Everglades, Florida. This project involved the construction of a bridge over the FPL Discharge Canal,associated embankments/approach on either side of the canal, and a roadway that leads south of the bridge to the South Port in Port Everglades. Provided geotechnical engineering services for the construction of a bridge over the FPL Discharge Canal, associated embankments/approach on either side of the canal, and a roadway that leads south of the bridge to the South Port in Port Everglades. Field work included Standard Penetration Test(SPT)borings.auger borings, and Borehole Permeability (BHP) tests. Also provided quality control during construction. Observed the installation of pre- cast piles for the PDA testing, provided all concrete testing for the bridge construction. Monitored the stabilizing of organic soils (with the use of cement admixtures and mixing) under the proposed bridge approach and performed density testing on embankment, MSE walls. utility backfill. stabilized subgrade. base. Also observed asphalt placement during production, verified mix design for compliance, selected asphalt core locations for testing, monitored placement of prime and tack coats, as well as roller patterns,temperature and thickness during placement. Grove Isle Seawall Repair, Biscayne Bay, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering study for the seawall repair project for the southern portion of the seawall. Provided geotechnical discussion of subsurface and groundwater conditions. Provided soil parameters for foundation design for new steel sheet piles. 123 itierra • SOUTH FLORIDA SR AlA/Ocean Drive-Shoreline Stabilization for FDOT District IV, St. Lucie County, Florida. Performed geotechnical engineering study for the possible use of sheet pile to stabilize some sections of the shoreline along SR Al A/Ocean Drive from MP 3.3 to MP 5.9. Provided soil parameters be considered in determining earth pressures for proposed sheet pile wall and other geotechnical recommendations. Structural Remediation of Seawall at Sundance Marina,Jensen Beach, Florida. Performed geotechnical study which included subsurface exploration and recommendations for the structural improvement of seawall below two existing structures(motor storage and boat storage buildings). Pressure grouting was considered to improve the soils along the sea wall and below the structures.Completed on time and within budget. CR 707/Indian River Drive, St. Lucie County, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering study which included a slope stability analysis for the existing embankment along CR-707/Indian River Drive for the Florida Department of Transportation, District 4.The purpose of the geotechnical study was to analyze the slope stability of the embankment along CR 707/Indian River Drive which was repaired after Hurricanes Jeanne and Francis in 2004. Slope stability analysis of the slope was performed using the computer program"STABLPRO"from ENSOFT, INC. Soil parameters were utilized for the soil types encountered and the slope stability analysis yielded that the estimated safety factor for the most critical failure surface exceeded the minimum requirement. 124 17. ITS naw ulmton an•ncei .wnig,-.,��•.•y..n�a., WNW uonyri H�rnan coo.e.uwn d:ecewniogK•s creaba,of Intelligent Transport Systems .aic sols vi+vwon W e Roads �„ ravel Vehicles J Elh.+a 1•anqul Sla andavac YY[fe. Areas d rSSS dI at IIS JNtl RS Cwrr City of MIAMI BEACH zd Miami Beach Active Traffic Management MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: As part of this effort, traffic along various key corridors within the City of Miami Beach are being actively monitored for abnormal travel conditions and the need for signal traffic modifications to improve traffic conditions during incidents such as crashes. lane closures, abrupt volume increase, etc. There are four main objectives for the Active Traffic Management program: •••01.' . 1) Minimize traffic impacts • 2) Manage and provide orderly flow of traffic 3) Minimize the use of police resources for traffic - control activities 4) Relay critical real-time travel information via social �_} � — media (Twitter) and/or Variable Message Signs 1-)‘ ' i .mss (VMS signs) Client: City of Miami Beach ' y 1 Transportation Department Address: 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 Services Provided: • Actively monitor travel conditions along various Contact: roadways utilizing CCTV cameras and Bluetooth/WiFi Josiel Ferrer-Diaz. E.I. vehicle detection device Transportation Manager • Provide travel time reports to City staff and Signal Phone: Engineer in order to evaluate and implement signal 305-673-7080 timing modifications as appropriate Email: • Developed signal timing patterns for various key JosierFerrer@miamibeachfl.gov corridors to accommodate the traffic flow during special events Project Dates: Ongoing Project Fee: $850,000 �2 METRIC NEE ENGINEERING 126 DMS System Wide Implementatio Project Design Build MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: The project included the system-wide design, construction and installation of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) that includes 9 mainline and 9 arterial Dynamic Messages Signs YARNING (DMS), DMS verification Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) VEHICLE ACCIDENT cameras, Incident Management CCTV cameras and fiber optic AWADcommunications connectivity to existing MDX Fiber Optic ^-- Communications backbone. The connectivity of the ITS components with the MDX Fiber Optic Communications Backbone included the installation of conduit and single mode fiber optic cable (SMFOC), warning tape, locate wire, standard route markers (SRM), grounding, pull boxes and fiber splice enclosures. The components were connected to the existing MDX ITS fiber optic backbone for communications and integration with the FDOT District 6, SunGuide®Transportation Management Center and MDX Headquarters. The Project also included design and construction of DMS structures and the CCTV camera poles. The ITS components installed on the Services Provided: Project were integrated with the FDOT SunGuide®Software • ITS Design platform. This project encompasses approximately 2 miles of ITS construction along five different corridors: SR 112, 836, 874, 878, and 924. Client: Miami-Dade Expressway Authority Address: 3790 N.W. 21 Street Miami, FL 33142 Contact: Juan Toledo, PE Assistant Director of Engineering Phone: 305-637-3277 Email: jtoledo@mdxway.com Project Dates: 2013-2015 Project Fee: $7.5M (Construction & Design) To!?/(N M , L9 ic% 9 METRIC AiEvc" ENGINEERING 127 ATMS Deployment along SR 826 and 1-395 (Design Build) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FLORIDA Project Description: wi*:- • This project consisted of the installation of a fiber optic 4 communications network and ITS devices installed along SR 826 and 1-395, including 14 CCTVs, 48 MVDSs, and 4 DMSs. The overall system tied into the existing District 6 Traffic Management Center. Corridors included were SR 826, 1-395, SR 886 (Port Blvd.)and project involved 12 total miles. Client: Florida Department of Transportation District 6 Address: 402411111.. . 1000 N.W. 111 Avenue Miami, FL 33172 Services Provided: Contact: • ITS Design Dari Vorce Project Manager Phone: 305-470-5349 Email: Dari.Vorce@dot.state.fl.us Project Dates: 2008 -2009 Project Fee: $7.6M (Construction Fee) alAle ti*1;, ' METRIC NEE ENGINEERING 128 DW Traffic Operations Transportati • I System Management Support S - BROWARD, PALM BEACH, MARTIN, ST.LUCIE& INDIAN RIVER COUNTIES FLORIDA Project Description: This project included support services for the TSM&O program Y,,,,o„ within the Florida Department of Transportation to improve the efficiency of existing transportation network through performance monitoring, active arterial management, Integrating Freeway Management with Arterial Management and Incident Management on Arterials and Freeways. The project included the deployment of an Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) along _ . .r the District's interstates to monitor and improve incident clearance time and travel time and the implementation of the Advanced • Transportation Monitoring System (ATMS). Both systems utilize SunGuide software to manage these devices and traffic signals. Client: Florida Department of Transportation it" District 4 Statewide Active Arterial dim._. Management Needs Plan Address: =tS Of p 3400 West Commercial Blvd. V Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Contact: Services Provided: Melissa Ackert, PE Project Manager • Signal Timing Plans • Signal Retiming Phone: 954-777-4156 • Active Arterial Management(AAM) Operations • In-House Support Email: melissa.askert@dot.state.fl.us • ITS/ATMS Design • Concept Reports Project Dates: 2011 -2016 • Feasibility Studies • Post Design Services Project Fee: $1.5M TR�� tic` ��? METRIC E ENGINEERING 129 LAND Founded in 2009, Eland Engineering, Inc. is a professional engineering firm specializing in planning, design, integration and construction management of Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)and advanced technology solutions. Our founding principles are to help clients to develop innovative,cost effective engineering and the cutting edge technology solutions that enhance the mobility and safety of transportation infrastructures. Eland is currently pre-qualified with the FDOT to perform all of the four categories in the field of ITS and is certified as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)/ Small Business(SBE)through FDOT. Eland provides our team with resilient expertise in the specialized ITS systems. Our 30 engineers, network specialists and computer professionals are dedicated to provide ITS solutions to our clients. Eland staff members are highly experienced in all elements of ITS, such as fiber optic and wireless communication technologies,CCTV cameras, dynamic message signs, vehicle detection stations,toll collection, and IP/Ethernet network architectures. Selected Protect Experience • ITS General Consultant,FDOT D4: as the ITS General Engineering Consultant for FDOT D4, Eland continues to support the District ITS programs vision and mission in all aspects of planning, design, system integration,construction, operations,and maintenance. Eland has developed 300 ITS RFP packages to support the extensive rollout of ITS deployments along the freeways of Broward, Palm Beach,Martin, St Lucie,and Indian River County. Today,the FDOT D4 ITS network extends over 250 miles of fiber optic linked together by 500+ ITS network switches to obtain real time video and traffic volume/speed data. Significant amounts of new ITS devices and infrastructures along with substantial system upgrades are being implemented or planned to support the inclusion of managed lanes into the District Four network along 1-95, I- 595 and 1-75 in the next 5 years and beyond. Contact: Bong Chen, FDOT District Four Project Manager,(954) 847-2785,2/2010-current • FTE ITS Maintenance,Florida Turnpike Enterprise- Eland was awarded as the prime contractor to provide ITS Maintenance Services for Florida Turnpike Enterprise(FTE) starting August 2016. FTE supports one of the largest 11S programs in the state,which consists of state- of-the-art ITS infrastructures and cutting edge operations to enhance safety,services and traffic flow. FEE ITS is comprised of two Traffic Management Centers(TMC),a dispatch center, a fiber optic based 10GB Ethernet communication backbone,as well as a wide range of ITS devices, including DMS,TTS,CCTV,VDS, HAR,and CBRAS,ancillary facilities, environmental conditioning equipment,device structures,and all related hardware,software and firmware. Eland performs routine,periodic and preventive maintenance activities on all ITS Equipment and all other equipment used within the FTE Intelligent Transportation Systems in Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Martin and St Lucie Counties,for approximately 170 miles. • ITS Maintenance(Interstate and Arterial Management System),Broward County, FDOT D4-Eland Engineering is the prime contractor responsible for maintaining about 200 miles ITS infrastructure and devices in Broward County to ensure a continuous(24 x7 x 365) system operation and functionality of all components of the ITS system. Eland has performed new device and infrastructure installations as needed and requested by FDOT,and provided all system support,warranty,routine and periodic maintenance,and failed or destroyed component replacement.7/2014 current(Reference: Lisa Esmer,FDOT D4 ITS Manager,954-847-2785) 130 ,'. IAM) • SR 826 Express Lanes East West,Miami Dade County: the Palmetto Expressway/SR 826 is one of the most traveled transportation corridors in Miami-Dade County.This project consists of the implementation of tolled express lanes along the SR 826 from 1-75 to Golden Glades Interchange. Eland was recently selected to perform the design of the ITS and toll support infrastructures for two segments of the project corridor. • 1-75 Express Lanes, Segment A,B,C,D& E,Broward and Miami-Dade Counties: Eland Engineering was responsible for the development of the project ITS and Toll Requirements, assisting the bid proposal review, providing post design support,and providing coordination with D4, D6 and FTE in reviewing and recommending responses to the request for information and project submittals. Contact: Robert Bostian, PE, FDOT District Four Project Manager, (954) 777- 4427,6/2014-current • 1-95 Express Lanes Phase II,Broward and Miami-Dade Counties: Eland Engineering was responsible for the development of the project ITS&Toll Requirements,assisting the bid proposal review,providing post design support, and providing coordination with D4,D6 and FTE in reviewing and recommending responses to the request for information and project submittals. Contact: Donovan Pessoa, PE, FDOT District Four Project Manager,(954) 777-4442,7/2007- 12,'2016 • 1-95 Express Lanes Phase HI,Broward and Miami-Dade Counties: Eland Engineering was responsible for the development of the project ITS&Toll Requirements,assisting the bid proposal review, providing post design support,and providing coordination with D4,D6 and FTE in reviewing and recommending responses to the request for information and project submittals. Contact: Robert Bostian, PE,FDOT District Four Project Manager, (954) 777-4427,4/2013 - current • 1-595 Express,Broward County: 1-595 Express is Florida's first public private partnership project.The$1.7 billion corridor improvements project consists of the reconstruction of the 1-595 mainline and improvements to adjacent crossroads,frontage roads and ramps. Highlights include a comprehensive ITS fully integrated and centralized to manage,control and operate the reversible express lanes,general purpose lanes and frontage roads. Eland was responsible for the development of the ITS system master plan, ITS technical requirements package,engineer estimate and post design support services for design-build,integration,testing and training of ITS components. • ATMS and ITS Broward Boulevard Design in Broward County,FDOT D4 -Eland Engineering is responsible for the design of the ATMS and Signal fiber optic communication network subsystem including both ITS and signal cabinets, Power subsystem,Closed Circuit Television(CCTV)camera traffic monitoring subsystem, Microwave Vehicle Detection system (MVDS),Bluetooth vehicle detection,Automated Vehicle Identification(AVI) and Dynamic Message Sign(DMS) subsystem. 10/2015-current(Reference: Ronald Wallace, P.E., FDOT D4 Project Manager, 954-777-4641) • ATCS and ITS PGA Boulevard Design in Palm Beach County,FDOT D4-Eland Engineering is responsible for the design of Adaptive Traffic Control Systems(ATCS)and fiber optic communication network subsystem,Closed Circuit Television(CCTV)camera traffic monitoring subsystem,Microwave Vehicle Detection system(MVDS), Power subsystem, 131 i" • L4 Dynamic Message Sign (DMS)subsystem and Adaptive Traff c Control System. 9/2015 - current(Reference:Vanita Saini, P.E., FDOT D4 Consultant Management, 954-777-4068) • ATMS and ATCS Pines Boulevard in Broward County,FDOT D4-Eland Engineering is responsible for developing the ITS technical functional requirements for design-build,integration, testing and training of ATMS/Adaptive Traffic Control Systems(ATCS),fiber optic communication network subsystem,Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)camera traffic monitoring subsystem, Microwave Vehicle Detection system (MVDS), Bluetooth vehicle detection, Dynamic Message Sign(DMS) subsystem and Adaptive Traffic Control System. 10/2015 current (Reference: Aurally. Benitez, P.E., FDOT D4 Consultant Management,954-777-4346) • Miami-Dade Expressway Authority(MDX) ITS Services-Eland is providing the engineering and design services for several ITS improvements projects on the MDX roadways, including: ITS Infrastructure relocation for the emergency access ramp, SR 836 Dolphin Expressway; ITS Design for new Open Road Tolling(ORT)gantries, SR 112 Airport Expressway; ITS Design for off system signage SR 112 Airport Expressway; and ITS Desigm for Roadway widening and resurfacing,SR 112 Airport Expressway. • SR 80 Fog Detection System Design,Palm Beach County: SR 80 is a rural principal arterial that is surrounded by sugar cane farms. Fog and smoke generated by the burning sugar canes can reduce visibility to a few feet for the local traffic. Reduced visibility along SR 80 caused by Fog /smoke conditions has resulted in severe traffic accidents involving many vehicles and injuries. Eland is helping FDOT D4 in the design of the automatic Fog Detection and Warning System to identify conditions of low visibility and notify approaching drivers of the situation before encountering it. • SR 25/US 27 ITS Design Criteria Packages,Broward and Palm Beach County-Eland Engineering was responsible for the preliminary engineering and conceptual planning for the ITS devices for the 45 mile project corridor,performed voltage drop calculations for the power distribution systems,technology evaluations and development of minimum technical requirements.The project consists of 46 miles of fiber optic,3 roadway visibility sensor stations, 10 Dynamic Message Signs(DMS),45 Closed Circuit Television(CCPV),and 90 Microwave Vehicle Detection Stations(MVDS). Contact:Julio Delgado, PE,FDOT District Four Project Manager,(954) 777-4468, 10/2011 to 6/2012 • ATMS Deployments in Broward and Palm Beach Counties: Eland provided procurement support services in the form of development of selection criteria,submittal review, comment and preparation of recommendations relating to Extended Letters of Interests and Technical Proposals for the .ATMS deployments in Broward and Palm Beach Counties. Eland is also providing the post design support for the contract. Contact: Vanita Saini, PE, FDOT District Four Project Manager,(954)7774468, 10/2013 to current 132 18 . Smart Parking -411, 1 City of Aiiil' WALKER STUDY EXPERIENCE PARKING CONSULTANTS CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PARKING DEPARTMENT Miami Beach was incorporated ; "- - - on March 26, 1915. The _ municipality is located on a series of natural and man-made barrier _ fi, islands between the Atlantic - • Ocean and Biscayne Bay. With a �T_ - population of about 88,000, Miami , :z_;��-„ . ;,-;' 1i.* 1 Beach has been one of America'sle, _illi g 1.- -*...�=r �_ pre-eminent beach resorts since524;, i _, 4 , -i 't ---- : the early 20th century. Over the a- Ei` r, .• ' r.^ . t past decade, Walker Parking ..,. ` ::tax -t!'` .!; ' Consultants has assisted the City ' s t• by conducting a series of analyses ' — � _wj . I including: T•" - -, • Supply/Demand Analysis • Alternatives Analysis • Financial Feasibility Analysis • Valet Parking Financial Valuation Study Client: City of Miami Beach, Parking Department Address: 1755 Meridian Avenue, Suite 200, Miami Beach, FL 33139 Contact: Saul Frances, Director of Parking Phone: 305-673-7000 ext. 6483 Fax: 305-673-7853 Email: saulfraces@miamibeachfl.gov Key Walker Personnel: Managing Principal: Gary Rider, PE Project Manager: Jon Martens, AICP, CAPP 134 STUDY EXPERIENCE WALKER ?ARKING CONSULTANTS CITY OF DUNEDIN - DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT PLANNING The City of Dunedin sought Walker's assistance to develop a parking management plan for the Downtown Business District to ensure an adequate, organized, affordable and safe parking supply is available to support demand created by residents, retail/dining patrons, City Hall visitors, and downtown employees. The potential loss of nearly one half of the off-street parking spaces leased by the City due to planned development by the owners of those Downtown parcels spurred action to create a plan the would allow the City to finance the construction and operation of future parking facilities rather than rely on tax dollars as is the case with the current leases. Walker provided comprehensive services including but not limited to: ',;, �. Parking supply/demand modeling r .-• ��• .. � ;;� *i.r. ,t k �� , +�. $ • Operations and financial modeling for paid parking r • 3 ;„- - - • Feasibility 'i' a--.- `"'i . • recommendations and a: alternatives Integrated district parking ` --"� management plan Client: City of Dunedin Address: 737 Louden Avenue, Dunedin, FL 34698 Contact: Robert Ironsmith, CRA & Economic Development Director Phone: 727-298-3204 Fax: 727-298-3205 Email: rironsmith@dunedinfl.net Key Walker Personnel: Managing Principal: Gary Rider, PE Project Manager: Jon Martens, AICP, CAPP Parking Consultant: Jim Corbett, CAPP 135 WALKER STUDY EXPERIENCE PARK:NGCCNSULTANTS CITY OF SARASOTA - PARKING PLANNING AND STRATEGIES Sarasota endeavors to be a walkable community and take advantage of its location and its most beautiful asset, Sarasota Bay. Walker was engaged to assist the City Parking Division in preparing a citywide strategic parking plan. In order to develop the plan, the City wanted to have a better understanding of parking utilization, turnover and demand in the unique destination districts within the City limits. Particular districts included the downtown business district, the marina/waterfront district, and St. Armand's to name a few. Each of these destination districts manifests its own unique business and community needs and was evaluated independently in order to develop strategies that enhance specific parking areas. The study took into consideration seasonal variations caused by snowbirds and tourists. On-street parking and off-street parking in public and private parking garages and small isolated surface parking lots, were part of the study that included: • Parking supply/demand modeling • Feasibility recommendations and alternatives • Provide integrated citywide parking plan Client: City of Sarasota, Parking Division Address: 1565 1st Street, Suite 114, Sarasota, FL 34230 Contact: Mark Lyons, Director Parking Division Phone: 941-954-7058 Fax: 941-364-7357 E-mail: Mark.Lyons@sarasotagov.com y•: Key Walker Personnel: •• 4 `• Managing Principal: Gary Rider, PE Project Manager: Jon Martens, oef,,k ._aa' AI CP, CAPP • /, tt , .4 i.i - it �T•}R -,• S` 136 STUDY EXPERIENCE WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS RIVIERA BEACH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Riviera Beach is located in Palm Beach County and was incorporated September 29, 1922. The City's municipal beach is one of the finest in the state. The Port of Palm Beach, home port of the Bahamas Celebration cruise ship is located in Riviera Beach. The City's CRA unveiled a plan to spend $29 million to renovate a waterfront park and City's community hall while creating a new public market and boardwalk in hope of attracting $245 million from private developers to turn the 10-block area between Broadway and the waterfront into a district of shops, restaurants, apartments and a tourist hotel. Under Walker's Continuing Consulting Services Agreement with the City of Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Walker was engaged to assist with planning the Marina District parking facilities as well as other potential parking facilities. These projects include parking garages, surface lots, metered surface parking, and integrated parking solutions for complex mixed-use projects within the CRA District. Walker received four Work Orders between 2012 and 2015 to provide a variety parking consulting services including but not limited to: • Municipal parking facility fee study • Parking demand and trip generation modeling • Design guidelines and scenario testing • Operations and financial modeling and recommendations • Feasibility recommendations and alternatives • Provide integrated district parking plan Client: Riviera Beach Community Redevelopment Agency Contact: Scott Evans, Director Address: 2001 Broadway, Suite 300, Riviera Beach, FL 33404 Phone: 561-844-3408 Fax: 561-881-8043 Email: sevans@rbcra.com Key Walker Personnel: Managing Principal: Gary Rider, PE Project Manager: Jon Martens, AICP, CAPP 137 CIou'Parc Case Studies Mineola was CloudParc's first prototype tested from 2013-2016. Cameras and a server were installed at the I-Tech Security, a firm specializing in security camera sales and installation. Cameras were mounted on a building, and CloudParc's design and concept were put into practice. The system was still running until about 3 months ago when I-Tech relocated their office to another location. We do intend on re-installing and upgrading the system at their new office location in order to continue our research and development for future applications. In May, 2015, UMTRI, (U of Michigan Transportation Research Institute) Beta location launched. UMTRI is one of the world's premier transportation research institutes and a major center designed to test 21st century transportation and Smart City technologies in partnership with top auto manufacturers, tier-1, suppliers, government agencies & academia. CloudParc is the only smart parking solution tested, and was sponsored by Xerox. CloudParc was also brought along with Xerox to participate in the M City demo day during the grand opening of their new facility with test track, etc. There included a total of about 10 parking spaces with occupancy detection functionality, along with a smart phone app with driver guidance. The program was successful as evidence by the pictures that follow in #2. CloudParc has since been invited back to Ann Arbor to continue to work on more research and development for smart transportation. In April, 2015, CloudParc's Brooklyn Beta was installed and has successfully demonstrated and tested the extensive camera hand off and integration processes of the machine vision and artificial intelligence combination since the time of installation. These processes are the key to the fully automated integration system that guides the driver into a parking space, tracks data points and communication systems for automated metering and payment and violation enforcement. The system has successfully tracked data points such as vehicle detections, time, and violations that are not only invaluable to the smart parking process but are applicable to many other smart city applications as well. Please view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yOhvJ6sj0&feature=youtu.be 138 A Cloud Parc 7 -- Photos showing work completed during development. 1) Mineola ,. milminierA-- ., UCU$L rust iaw.» .r .h, !. ..0140115. �4 • 0.. • • 4 y o ,,.. o, i .e, .: ..C...,L.IL.,1 ,i A' ..-El=iiiii.1.10--MEI-.--' •• -.- .,... Air, . 2) UMTRI / M-City https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CEvH71Ws1E -, .,--7—"Air4Z':,',-, _' .43‘11111 i '"'13� ..� ;gyp p f'''''' . \. . .„ -*MI r ._ , _ ,,, ,,,,,... ., ..,„,pr--e„..- .i.,---4,, - -- ,‘. 4 6 E r--- �_ oO � •;; .. 4 - -4 .1- ..„„ • -___ - ,- . . - .,.1, _ i . ., F :. . , f r -- Tr1 :JIu_... _ _114, . 11111 139 Cloud Parc „Al,' 1 f #3 Brooklyn « C . •. w•,......n..,,. • 7.1 Q .."'"."'""r.." urcasa1Ay.aiMeauyniu., \ ... MaoO•n=TOWi Ai IP O• al • • • .• « • • • tMI • Camera Output R..o4.m. r....._ • , r_ - a - — • N. It ME MIMI tea_0"_. 140 C1ouoParc .1eLL i 111111111! !�1! !!!! 11!!!l111111!!! 141 Tab 1 I Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER 1 .3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Appendix C.3 I Project Manager Experience Project Manager James Spinks III, PE. PTOE has served as the General Transportation Planning and/or Traffic Engineering Consultant for more than 20 municipalities in South Florida, most recently: Village of Palmetto Bay, General Transportation Planning Consultant(2014-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description: On-call transportation planning services, including various types of mobility studies, community involvement. council presentations, design of roadway and intersection improvements and site plan and traffic impact analysis reviews. - Value: $500,000.00 - Contact: Edward Silva,Village Manager, 305-259-1234, esilva@palmettobay-fl.gov Town of Cutler Bay, General Engineering Contract(2014-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description:Town wide Traffic Calming Study - Value: $85.000.00 - Contact: Alfredo Quintero, Public Works Director, 305-234-4262, aquintero@cutlerbay-fl.gov City of South Miami, Professional General Engineering and Architectural Services (2013-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description:West and South Pinecrest Villas Traffic Calming Study - Value: $92,502.00 - Contact: Shari Kamali, Deputy City Manager. 305-668-2510, skamali@southmiamifl.gov Town of Miami Lakes, General Engineering Contract(2012-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description: On-call transportation planning services, including various types of mobility studies, community involvement, council presentations, design of roadway and intersection improvements and site plan and traffic impact analysis reviews. - Value: $130,000.00 - Contact: Darby Delsalle, Director Planning and Zoning. 305-364-6100, delsalleD@miamilakes-fl.go - Contact: Michelle Gonzalez, Senior Transportation Manager. (305)364-6100 ext. 1200, gonzalezm@ miamilakes-fl.gov City of Doral, General Engineering Contract(2015-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description: On-call transportation planning services, including various types of mobility studies, design of roadway and intersection improvements and Pavement Evaluation&Five-Year Maintenance and Rehabilitation Report - Value: $150,000.00 - Contact: Jorge Gomez, City Engineer, 305-593-6740,Jorge.gomez@cityofdoral.com 2017-126-KB 1142 Tab 1 I Letter & Minimum Qualifications Requirements CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R Miami Shores Village, Villagewide Traffic Consultant(2015-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description:Village Wide Traffic Study - Value: $ 106,370.00 - Contact:Torn Benton, Village Manager, 305-762-4851, bentonT@miamishoresvillage.com City of Parkland, General Engineering Consultant(2016-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description: On-call transportation planning services, including Multiple site plan and traffic impact analysis reviews - Value: $ 15,000.00 - Contact: Sowande Johnson, City Engineer, 954-753-5040, sjohnson@cityofparkland.org City of Aventura, Traffic Engineering Services (2015-2017) - Role: Project Manger - Description: On-call transportation planning services, including Multiple site plan and traffic impact analysis reviews - Value: $25,000.00 - Contact: Joanne Carr, Community Development Director, 305-466-8940,jcarr@cityofaventura.com 2017-126-KB 1143 TAB 2: EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS City of MIAMI BEACH AIL Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications LOC H N E R CITY OF MIAMI BEACH 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Lochner was founded in 1944 and is a pioneer in the field of transportation, planning and design. Lochner is passionate about developing"Transportation Solutions that Improve Communities"...for the people. Lochner is a full-service, multidiscipline firm with more than 550 professionals who collaborate to deliver all modes of innovative, creative, state-of-the-art, cost-effective transportation solutions in transportation planning,traffic engineering, roadway design, rail and transit, structures,environmental, aviation,construction, and alternative delivery.With more than 30 offices across the United States,our clients benefit from committed professionals with local knowledge and national expertise.This contract will be managed from our Doral, Florida office located at 8750 NW 36th Street, Doral, Florida 33178. We are driven to develop custom transportation infrastructure solutions by collaborating with public and private industry clients to plan, evaluate, design,and implement approaches that maximize budgets, expedite schedules, extend asset life spans, and provide efficiencies through impact and maintenance reductions. Since the early 1970s in Florida,we have been successfully providing quality transportation engineering services for our statewide and local clients, including(but not limited to)the City of Miami, City of South Miami, City of Sunny Isles Beach,Weststhore Alliance, and the Florida Department of Transportation.The knowledge and experience we have gained makes us uniquely qualified to provide these services to the City of Coral Gables. Lochner planners, environmental specialists, designers,engineers, inspectors, and project managers are team- oriented, problem solvers,and innovators.Throughout project delivery, Lochner is committed to collaborating with clients, stakeholders, and community members.We value clear communication and seek to build lasting partnerships. As employee-owners,we take pride in the work we do and the trust and respect that we continue to maintain within the transportation consulting industry. Our clients trust us to remain focused and committed to helping them achieve their project goals. We specialize in providing full-service engineering and planning services wholly related to transportation facilities and offer a team of professionals to efficiently deliver any project in size and scope typical of this contract.We are prequalified by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)in Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Studies; minor, major and complex highway design; minor and major bridge design; bridge inspection,including conventional, movable, complex and bridge load rating;traffic engineering and operations studies, including traffic engineering studies, and traffic signal timing and Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)analysis, design and implementation;traffic operations design including signing, pavement marking and channelization, lighting and signalization; Construction Engineering Inspection(CEI), including roadway construction, bridge construction and construction materials; engineering contract administration and management; and planning,including policy planning, systems planning,subarea/corridor planning, land planning/engineering,and transportation statistics. Lochner is: Client Focused We understand when a client selects Lochner for a project,they trust us to deliver on our commitments and provide value through timely, high-quality service. Our collaborative approach means we are attentive to challenges clients often face in the delivery of a project.We build lasting partnerships with our clients, resulting in repeat opportunities for collaboration. Performance Driven We are driven by a passion for turning transportation infrastructure challenges into opportunities for innovation, added value,and impact mitigation.With clients and users in mind,we develop customized solutions to improve safety and enhance the everyday lives of motorists, pedestrians,cyclists, and transit users. Lochner fosters a culture of delivering high-quality work, on-time, and on-budget. Our people bring an internal commitment to this, reinforcing both the firm's culture and our overall dedication to strengthening the communities we serve. 2017-126-KB 11 Tab 2 I Experience &Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Employee Owned At Lochner we take pride in our work and our firm.As employee owners our commitment is seen in our drive to exceed client expectations,deliver high-quality work, use cutting-edge technologies, and maintain a team-oriented, inclusive culture.Clients benefit from the strength of relationship,collaboration, and performance that employee- owners bring to projects. Lochner offers a comprehensive suite of services that enables us to provide trusted and responsive consulting on a variety of surface transportation, rail,transit, and aviation projects. We plan and design with an eye for implementation.Our transportation professionals collaborate across disciplines to streamline the project development process.The result is added efficiency in project delivery and practical solutions to project challenges. Whether surface transportation, rail,transit,or aviation,our professionals work collaboratively with clients, stakeholders,and community members to move projects forward efficiently and effectively. When a client selects Lochner,they trust their project is carefully managed and successfully delivered.This includes managing project costs, seeking ways to reduce risk, and providing tailored solutions. Lochner staff has experience serving on similar contracts for more than 20 municipalities in South Florida and have established strong working relationships with the local municipalities,the TPOs and councils. Lochner's range of expertise enables us to offer our clients—from small private developers to large public agencies—a single source to meet all of their regulatory, engineering,and planning needs. Lochner has nearly 30 offices nationwide in 17 states,with five in Florida(Miami,Tampa, Orlando,Jacksonville, and Tallahassee).We serve the entire state of Florida,assisting public and private clients in their efforts to plan for transportation and livability,with the technical expertise to provide a reliable, convenient, safe and connected multi- modal network throughout the entire City. Partnership is the Lochner key philosophy, as we also have a vested interest in the success of the City fulfilling the mission to provide a safe multimodal transportation network that provides job accessibility without jeopardizing the high quality of life that exists in surrounding neighborhoods and implement services and programs that meet the needs of today without compromising the ability to meet the needs of tomorrow. If given the opportunity to be selected,we will partner with the City of Coral Gables and implement our alliance through teamwork and the right allocation of resources within our proposed Team. Our goal is to perform the required services,on time,with the right personnel,which will ultimately be beneficial to the public and produce technically sound contract documents that are cost conscious, completed on-time and at a cost-savings to the City of Coral Gables.Constant and proactive communication with the City's Project Manager will be maintained throughout the life of the contract. Surface Transportation For more than 73 years Lochner has been a recognized leader in surface transportation, specializing in the following areas: • Accelerated Bridge Construction(ABC)Design • ADA Assessment&Design • Alternative Delivery • Bridge&Structure Rehabilitation&Retrofitting • Bridge&Culvert Design • Bridge Inspection&Load Rating • Community&Stakeholder Outreach • Complete Streets • Construction Engineering&Inspection • Drainage&Water Facilities • Environmental Studies&Documentation 2017-126-KB ( 2 Tab 2 Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R • Fish Passage Improvements • Hydraulic&Hydrologic Analysis • Intelligent Transportation Systems • Intersection&Roundabout Planning&Design • Interchange Planning&Design • Noise&Retaining Walls • Multimodal&Active Transportation • Pavement Rehabilitation&Design • Right of Way • Roadway Planning&Design • Signal&Lighting Design • Traffic Engineering • Transportation Planning • Utility Coordination Rail& Transit From planning and design to overall system analysis and management, Lochner's rail and transit team is committed to keeping people and goods moving. • Alternative Delivery • Bus Rapid Transit Planning&Design • Community&Stakeholder Outreach • Construction Engineering&Inspection • Environmental Studies&Documentation • Intelligent Transportation Systems • Rehabilitation&Retrofitting • Right of Way • Light, Commuter,&Freight Route Line Assessment&Design • Station Planning&Design • Structure Assessment&Design • System&Program Analysis Aviation Lochner's team of aviation professionals deliver results without compromising safety, quality, budget,or schedule. • Airport Master Planning • Apron Development • Circulation&Parking Assessments • Community&Stakeholder Outreach • Construction Engineering&Inspection • Environmental Studies&Documentation • Helipad Location Planning&Design • Lighting&Navigational Systems • Passenger Access&Wayfinding • Right of Way • Runway&Taxiway Rehabilitations&Extensions • Wildlife Hazard Analysis&Mitigation 2017-126-KB 13 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Transportation Planning Lochner's Transportation Planning Team takes a multi-modal approach to planning and developing modern transportation systems for Florida's diverse and growing population. Lochner specializes in a full range of transportation planning services, including: • Project Development and • Congestion Management Planning Environment(PD&E)Studies Planning • Pedestrian&Bicycle Design • Legislative/Regulative/Policy • Congestion Pricing and Innovations Analysis Managed Lanes Travel • Bike Share Planning&Design • Multimodal Analysis and • Demand Analysis • Wayfinding Planning&Design Planning • Data Mining/Management • Health Impact Analysis • Freight Assessments and • Interchange Access Request • Complete Streets Planning and Studies (IMRs, IJRs, IOARs, SIMRs) Design • Systems Planning • Site Impact and Growth • Safe Routes to Schools • Subarea/Transportation Corridor Management Reviews • Bikeway Design, Plans, Planning Studies • Modal Application Specifications&Estimates • Land Planning/Engineering • Multi-Modal Corridor Analysis • Safe Routes to Transit • Transportation Statistics • Transit Capacity&Quality of • Bicycle&Pedestrian Forecasting • Site Plan Development Review Service Assessments &GIS Analysis • Comprehensive Plans • Multi-Modal Transportation • Traffic Calming Master Plans • EAR Based Amendments Studies • Site Plan Development Review • Traffic Impact Study Preparation/ • Park and Ride Lot Assessment • Transit Stop Location and Design Review • Preliminary Concept Studies Analysis • Access Management/Functional • Project Traffic/Travel Demand • Trail Networks&Multi-use Paths Classifications Forecasting Level of Service Analysis ■ Complete Streets • Multimodal Level of Service • Smart Growth • Community Outreach/Public (LOS)Analysis • Livable Cities Involvement • Bicycle Pedestrian&Trail Master • Community Outreach Traffic Engineering Our team provides a broad range of professional traffic engineering services such as level of service/highway capacity analyses, microscopic traffic simulation,traffic signal timing and optimization,and safety analysis. Lochner professionals have conducted intersection, data collection and analysis, and development of traffic parameters and forecasting for transportation systems. Lochner specializes in a full range of Traffic Engineering to solutions to achieve optimum levels of operation and safety for the roadway system, including: • Qualitative Assessments • Traffic Signal Design • Expressway and Arterial Level of • Left-Turn Phase Warrant Analysis • Travel Time and Delay Studies Service Analysis • Traffic Engineering Research • Intersection Delay Studies • Intersection Analysis • Traffic Operations Safety Before • Queue Analysis • Arterial Analysis &After Studies • Vehicle Gap Studies • Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety ■ Intelligent Transportation • Conflict Analysis • Mid-Block Crossing Warrants Systems(ITS) • Spot Speed Studies • Capacity Analysis • Signalization&Pavement • Sight Distance Analysis • Safety Improvement Markings • Roadway/Highway Lighting Recommendations • Parking&Origin-Destination Studies • Signal Warrant Analysis Studies • Safe Curve Speed Studies • Microscopic Simulation • Traffic Data Collection • Collision Diagrams • Access Management • Traffic Impact Studies • Railroad Crossing Preemption • Traffic Signal Retiming, Phasing • Operational Analysis Studies &Optimization • Benefit/Cost Analysis • Parking Analysis • Safety&Accident Studies • Fatal Crash Reviews • Safety/Crash Analysis • High Crash Location • Net Present Value Analysis Investigation • Expected Value Crash Analysis • Road Safety Audits 2017-126-KB I 4 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Geographic Information System (GIS) The Lochner team has full in-house GIS capabilities.At Lochner GIS stands for: • Good Communication • Increased Project Understanding • Sound Decision Making and Design Documentation In this data rich world we now live in Lochner uses GIS for all client needs at all levels of a project,and even the ones they did not know that could be enhanced by GIS, such as: • Environmental mapping • Roadway/Transit Alignment Alternatives • Land Use Integration • Alternative Screening • Public Involvement • Decision Making • Project Design • Right of Way Mapping/Acquisition • Construction • Asset Management • Proposed/Future Alternatives Layouts The capabilities are endless. GIS simply allows for more detail to be displayed than a single map or a presentation board. Our Lochner GIS Team works closely with our traffic engineers and transportation planners. Using these relationships,spatial databases are created to efficiently manage all locational data and related attributes. Data is reviewed for quality and accuracy and all validated data is web accessible for the project team,the client or stakeholders through on an online portal.This allows the project team and regional entities to easily access and share all project data. Our GIS staff provides ongoing resource and data analysis support in all alternatives/ scenarios development and during the decision making processes. In addition,we utilize to support public involvement efforts through the production of web-based and interactive materials along with as needed maps and document figures. Based on parcel data,an outreach management database can be created within minutes to ensure effective outreach to targeted project areas. The Lochner GIS Team can help Project Managers and clients tell the story in a number of ways: • Visual representation-utilized to show any geo-located data,alternatives,design, analysis, impacts, etc.To be used in all stages of the project - Static figures - Interactive web maps • - Story books - Map books • Analysis-can be used in a variety of ways.Typically we use for: - Alternative screening analysis - Crash analysis - Resource Impacts analysis • Asset Management • ROW Management Our Lochner web-based project mapping is available 24/7 at http://gis.hwlochner.com/gallery/for all to see. Try it... Go take a look at our projects! 2017-126-KB 5 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCH N ER This approach simply improves project communication (stakeholders, public, client, and decision makers)and allows ' MNM _ R for your message to continuously be heard.Anyone can utilize it, it can be used in all phases of the project, it can incorporate -'- '" CAD data to effectively show/communicate project design and impacts, and it can also be used as an effective asset "°"" management tool,where data can be easily accessed in the z`" "' `" y- '"""°` field. 1 AN• Wall to The use of story books allows the public to navigate all stages of the project,zoom in and out of alternatives,view impacts, F.4 • etc. Web access also allows the public to place comments " "" ' •••• in specific project locations, etc.,which improves project `, transparency and project understanding. If a project has right of way impacts,a GIS interactive database allows for ease of acquisition management and can be linked to public involvement/parcel owner comments regarding the parcel, impacts or thoughts on acquisition, providing the City of Coral Gables more context. Experience with local Municipalities and Miami-Dade Lochner key staff has successfully completed projects for numerous municipalities throughout the South Florida Tri-County area including the Treasure Coast.We have served multiple governmental agencies, understand the keys to success for these types of contracts and are accustomed to working within tight budgets and schedules.We have experience working with regulatory agencies and will comply with all laws and regulations.The list below features our public client list our key staff have performed similar services to those requested in the City's RFQ: • Florida's Department of • Town of Miami Lakes • City of West Park Transportation (FDOT) • City of Sunny Isles Beach • City of Weston • Miami-Dade County TPO • Village of Miami Shores • City of Aventura • Broward MPO • Town of Cutler Bay • City of Fort Lauderdale • Palm Beach MPO • City of North Miami Beach • City of Green Acres • Martin County MPO • City of Doral • City of North Lauderdale • St. Lucie County MPO • Village of Palmetto Bay • SFRTA • City of Miami • City of Miami Beach • City of South Miami • City of Homestead Institutions on all levels have entrusted Lochner staff with providing quality service,as well as,innovative solutions for solving complex design issues. Experience with Regulatory Agencies Lochner understands that the agency review process in South Florida is often complex with a number of overlapping jurisdictions and agencies.We have the technical knowledge and the ability to advocate to the various county agencies including Miami-Dade County, FDOT, SFWMD, FDEP,the Army Corps of Engineers,and all other permitting agencies on behalf of the City of Coral Gables.We have worked extensively with these agencies and understand the ultimate review and permitting process for all transportation projects. Because of this our experience, Lochner has established relationships with the agency's review and permitting staff and understand their expected standards and procedures,ensuring a smooth and quick approval process for any type of project. Our key staff have responsive relationships with Miami-Dade County Department of Public Works (DTPW)and understand the Miami-Dade's Miami-Dade Traffic Flow Modification(s)Street Closure(s)procedures and thresholds for traffic calming and other innovative traffic recommendations for which the City of Coral Gables may desire. Local Availability of Personnel Key personnel assigned to this project will be available to perform the work in a timely and responsible manner. Lochner utilizes a staff planning schedule through our Deltek Vision software based on projected workloads to 2017-126-KB 16 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER ensure our clients' desires are met and we are able to safeguard our reputation for completing projects on-time.This software allows Lochner to: • Make informed decisions to keep projects on time and on budget • Ensure the right people are on the right projects at the right time • Automate scheduling, resource allocation, budgeting and forecasting • Input timesheet entries and expense reporting into the project plan for an accurate rolling forecast Many organizations have difficulty defining staffing requirements, but Lochner's technology has enabled our organization to preserve consistent staffing numbers to respond to our client's needs and requests.This method of staffing has allowed Lochner to determine the number of productive hours for each staff member, calculate the number of hours required to address projected workloads and establish the optimal number of staff required to complete each project;which improves the overall efficiency of our operations. The project schedule and documents are stored in Lochner's ProjectWise file sharing"cloud based"system for 24/7 accessibility for the City's Project Manager,which is utilized to verify if documents are completed and where they stand for each task work order. Recognition Lochner has been recognized for its planning and design excellence.The projects shown below represent just a few of projects Lochner's recent award-winning projects: • 2017 Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)—District Six"Prudential Productivity Award"for the Biscayne Boulevard Pedestrian Crosswalk and Safety Project. • 2014 FICE/FDOT Outstanding Special Project Award for the US 41, 10th Street to o4 ,. 14th Street Complete Streets Project in Sarasota, Florida,which involved replacement Apim of two US 41 intersections with roundabouts, narrowing travel lanes, adding bike lanes, and lowering design speed to calm traffic. In addition, context-sensitive design features 2 0 6 PROJECT (improvement of transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities)were included. ; Of THE YEAR • 2014 Federal Highway Administration Environmental Excellence Award for the US 41, 10th Street to 14th Street Complete Streets Project in Sarasota, Florida,which have an effect on multiple cultural and historic resources, including two National Register ;ro„c.;,,,„;,,,, of Historic Places(NRHP)-listed resources:the Municipal Auditorium and the Central- ""Lochner,Inc. Cocoanut Historic District. • 2016 Public Works Project of the Year at the American Public Works Association (APWA)for the Natural Bridge Road and SR 20 Bridge Replacement in Leon County, Florida.The project involved replacement of a structurally deficient bridge,originally built in 1938,designated as a State Historic Site.The Lochner team's new design gave the new structure the appearance of an old wooden bridge and overcame adverse environmental conditions,while preserving an important geological,ecological,and historic site. • 2016 WSDOT Environmental Director's Award for the 1-5 JBLM Vicinity Congestion Relief Project.This three phased project included Lochner completing a corridor planning study to develop the ultimate 1-5 mainline footprint, a multimodal alternatives analysis that developed and analyzed long-term improvement options for the I-5 mainline and the four interchanges, as well as an in-depth analysis of improvement alternatives off the 1-5 mainline and preparation of the environmental documents to identify the project footprint in sufficient detail to determine right of way impacts and the area of potential effect. • 2015 American Concrete Pavement(ACPA)Excellence in Concrete Pavement Award for the Reliever &General Aviation Airport in Sedalia, MO.This National award recognized Lochner who provided design engineering and CEI services and a project that yielded the best pavements in airports, highways, and street and road applications. Detailed evidence of similar experience is found in Tab 1 1 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 2017-126-KB 17 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCH N ER RECOMMEDATION LETTERS 2017-126-KB 18 Cu • :a FLORIDA Public Works Department Alfredo Quintero Jr., EI,CFM,CGC,CCC Public Works Director June 22, 2017 ISA Certified Arborist To whom it may concern: As a consultant for the Town, James E. Spinks III served as a Project Manager for Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning related projects on a general engineering services contract. James has maintained a very good business relationship with the Town providing services. During the contract he served under, James played an instrumental role in the development of the Town's Traffic Calming Master Plan, where he developed the methodology, performed the study analysis, traffic counts, field observations, conducted several public workshops, prepared concept drawings, and coordinated with the Miami Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW). James is extremely technical and was always very responsive to the Town's request and needs. The Department of Public Works, of the Town of Cutler Bay, valued James as a dedicated Project Manager and a valuable resource. I hope our paths cross again in the future and I am pleased to recommend his services. Should you have any questions, please contact our office at (305) 234-4262. Sincerely, Alfredo Quintero Jr., EI, CFM, CGC, CCC Director of Public Works •FGBC Ev 10720 Caribbean Boulevard, Suite 105 • Cutler Bay, FL 33189 • 305-234-4262 • www.cutlerbay-fl.gov � Uk. ...AR1114.,{s Palmetto Bay July 27, 2017 To whom it may concern: I have known James Spinks professionally for more than 4 years. As a consultant on our continuing services provider list James has provided information for General Transportation Planning and Engineering Services. He has acted as an expert witness on numerous occasions. Additionally he has provided an array of services including development application reviews, traffic engineering and transportation planning studies and Master Plans. James has consistently exceeded my expectations with his level of professionalism and work products, with timely execution. He has always been attentive and responsive to my needs as a Planning Director, at times performing site plan and traffic impact analysis reviews for major site plan amendments and large scale developments within just a couple of days. James is always flexible to adjusting to fluctuations in project demands, meeting schedules and attending multiple hearing attendances. James has always been accessible and is extremely knowledgeable in his area of expertise. James has always gone the extra mile to please staff requirements. It has always been a pleasure working with James and I am pleased to give James my endorsement for Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning services. Should you have any questions, please contact our office at (305) 259-1234. Sincerely, 1%-vis Kendall Director of Plat ing 10 South', 1iami June 22, 2017 To whom it may concern: I offer this letter of recommendation for James Spinks for Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning services. For more than 10 years, James and I have had professional relationship where he has provided professional engineering services, even prior to my tenure here at the City of South Miami as the Deputy City Manager. James is a technically sound, established leader in Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering who continuously provides transportation services that enhance the quality of the residents. He has a diversity of expertise and is a consummate transportation consulting professional, as he is diligent about recommending data-driven recommendations. James has strong communication skills, as he has frequently presented both small and complex technical projects to the residents, City Commissioners, Boards or Home Owner's Associations (HOA) in a manner to easily gain consensus and approval. James is exceptionally knowledgeable and has always performed to my satisfaction. I would recommend him for future work for Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning services. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (305) 668-2510. Si r ly, C4ict c Shari Kamali Deputy City Manager 11 MIAMI)YLLAKES Growing Beautifully 6601 Main Street •Miami Lakes,Florida 33014 Office:(305)364-6100 • Fax:(305)558-8511 Website:www.miamilakes-fl.8ov July 7, 2017 To whom it may concern: I have known James Spinks for more than 5 years. During that time, James, as Project Manager, on Professional Services contracts for General Transportation Planning and Engineering Services has provided an array of services including development application reviews, traffic engineering and transportation planning studies and Master Plans. It has been my experience that James has consistently produced thorough work products, with timely execution. He has always been attentive and responsive to my needs as a Planning Director, at times performing site plan and traffic impact analysis reviews for major site plan amendments and large scale developments within just a couple of days. James is always flexible to adjusting to fluctuations in project demands, meeting schedules and attending multiple hearing attendances. James has always been accessible and is extremely knowledgeable in his area of expertise. James has always gone the extra mile to please staff requirements. It has always been a pleasure working with James and I am pleased to give James my endorsement for Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning services. Should you have any questions, please contact our office at(305) 364-6100. Sineee-rely, Darby Delsalle Director of Planning 12 Tab 2 I Experience&Qualifications City of Miami Beach RFQ 2017-126-KB I General Transportation Planning • 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Organizational Chart and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an"As Needed Basis" Tom Stoner.PE,P.Eng.(HWL) James Spines,PE,PTOE(HWL) Edwin Mojena.PE(HWL) TRANSPORTATION SMART GROWTH LIVABLE CITIES COMPLETE STREETS INTEGRATION OF ECONOMICS FINANCIAL PLANNING TRANSPORTATIONS LAND USE ANALYSIS James Solnks.PE.PTOE(HWL)- ) Maher MuratJerry Walters FPT-Task pp r Tam Lavas!(WTI.)-Task Leader Aide.PTP l ) S eel Howe.PE(HWL) Task Lula Iaron KfS..,1'(CS) Task leader Task Leader (EFT-ink leader Leader a-c; r V.'. <, �� 1 6 .i. . .. akrr J ':r� al rA,,e ,:I.i` t(([. kg, rY AI. .ars ir; - .... ,, TRANSIT PLANNING BIKE/PED PLANNING URBAN DESIGN STATION AREA PLANNING TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ROADWAY DESIGN Andrea Oslrodu.NCP.LEES AP Cludl Alasaeea,PE.MCP(FPI)- Aliredo Sane ker.Na AICP LIED Alfredo Sanchez.AL1.AICP.LEEO James Spirits.PE PTOE tPWL1- Edwin Molena.PE(HWL)-Talk Task Leader AP(BAP( Task Lealer Task Leadee (HWL) Task Leader _ AP(AAP)-Task Lula .r?-4►eW7i.?. IPj-..Y.. Cara Wessria Eft a_ ..A ,'Lrh.f711ii is iBiP! Mal WeY PE PTCt.HY/l: kkAnNa;a:GY.P:-/l. J%-eS SprkS P-F_E Inm oar.MJ1Cat A:A.:.AIA RPA, NU. Ovid Frani.PE(Mkt) • Susan Bb'k,C,WN: Pod�1wo).,'XTO:CS} ?nd Lu,as.PE%Tl1E(MVO Jeffrey B„one(BTC) Mat Wee.�E PT,E MAV. NCI:Plus; Baena(.IWrrepi.NCP;CI STeWn Eadxs.PE(MD; V.Ta1 Veleu7lo NCP,F1 Jr rf ( SCAM SKrelteGO LPE,PIM(WI'. LANDSCAPE SURVEY/UNDERWATER • PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL RVLLadvat ac(MMU DIVING VA ProleIkkie sGlopuCMe • Randy Hollingworth(AAP)-Tag Manny Vera,PAM(MGV)-Task r Maga).Abad(MCS(-Task leader B.Robed News,•(Me)- nal KnEnasamy,PE(TSF)- aex)»'md Candi%LIC IBTW leader Leads kt6,FAQ J,;S) TIME UMW Tag Leader CaebidmmS.eli lC I AS I -.'A BAP) Mark Sn ern.PSM(MGV! Catlin MI(MO) Kona'VOA PE LISP) MagS•Bruro(ACE) Emoted%eoneeg kC !. Tyre Mercado.rACE) D:raet'amber(Ail Ord Enuatriq.IN.OBI ' ¢ Fall St George Na) 4.,5=oes'wmpMwen raMArb(FPT) Gndo.LLC OAP ...,.. Mk?E CanJI:M Services.lnc(MCS! W M.G.Yen B'wanks nc tMGY! Z ITS SMART PARKING GRANT WRITING .;a n,: I -:: u:'I Mom Engnoee ec Win _ ��!! Pk4Ultie,LLC(PM) Sonia(Kerner-Oogar,Pe,PTO! Jim Cornell.CAPP(WPC)-Task dudry Ceuh lal I (MEI)-Task Leader Leader Robert Ruane(E311-Task NeesDaek(QC)-Tag Leader w°$per R� Siem E:wnes.aE iAEI) Jon Marro.AK.).CAPP(WPCI S�f�^Bla'k"C` ; Wet Par HlanaMarl1PC, U ban(E01 SHren Ne 1pW,CP) WU O RossiGaaLio(EB; Tan Wa)(CP) a.: Brad Lucas.PE.PTOE OW.) J . - . 13 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Project Manager Lochner's Project Manager,James E. Spinks III, PE, PTOE,will also serve as the Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering task leader.James is a proven and effective communicator,and has an established reputation as a leader in transportation planning and traffic engineering with proven experience in developing concepts that enhance transportation and quality of life.James has a profound comprehension of the regulatory framework that local governments must operate under. He recognizes that when we serve a municipality,we are not only serving the City Staff, Mayor, and Commissioners but we are also serving the public and all of the various clients that a municipality has, including developers,contractors, and other service providers and he is skilled to be responsive to a wide variety of transportation planning and highly detailed traffic operations requests.James has applied for 25 mph speed limit designations for multiple Miami-Dade cites,developed citywide traffic calming master plans for multiple municipalities with the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works(DTPW)that contained traffic circles, speed tables, and Complete Streets concepts that included lane repurposing,wide sidewalks, mid- block crosswalks, landscaping, bike lanes, bulb-outs, high-emphasis intersection crosswalks,and operational and safety improvements at intersections. In addition to municipal projects,James also recently served as the Project Manager to the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization(TPO),where he managed the Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan,the 2015 and 2016 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Plans,and the Bike Friendly Miami-Dade Plan. With more than 18 years of experience,James has provided transportation planning and traffic engineering consultant services,such as site plan review, agency comprehensive plan development,traffic impact study preparation and review,operational analysis using micro-simulation software, resolving resident traffic concerns, addressed pedestrian/bicycle safety and developed traffic calming master planning to more than 20 municipalities throughout the South Florida area including the City of Miami Beach. On the North Shore Neighborhood Improvements Project he served as the Senior Traffic Engineer implementing the City's BODR designed the planned improvements, including traffic analysis,character landscaping, streetscapes, parking, lighting,ADA access, and waterline replacement for more than eight miles of urban, neighborhood corridors.James provides a familiar and trusted staff supporting role to the Beach, having worked with the Director of Transportation Jose Gonzalez, PE, under other contracts.James is known for his calm and trusting demeanor when presenting complex technical projects,whether it be to the residents, City Commissioners, City Manager, Planning and Zoning Board,or a Home Owner's Association(HOA). James is familiar with the local area, as a he recently managed engineering contracts with FDOT District Six Traffic Operations and Safety Office and the Miami-Dade County TPO,just prior to joining Lochner.James is adept with the Miami-Dade County permitting agencies and procedures,as well as, FDOT and the South Florida Water Management District. Because of this experience, he has established relationships with the agency's review and permitting staff and understands their expected standards and procedures, ensuring a smooth and quick approval process for any type of project. He understands Miami-Dade's Miami Dade Traffic Flow Modification(s)Street Closure(s)procedures and thresholds for traffic calming and is creative in obtaining funding for traffic studies, through alternative revenue sources. In fact, recently James was the lead Traffic Engineer/Transportation Planner for the Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan,which received the 2015 State of Florida Planning and Zoning Board Award.This project is the Vision of the Downtown Redevelopment Task Force(DRTF),formed by the Village Manager Edward Silva and the Village Council. The DRTF charged the consultant team with bringing more business tax revenue to the Village,to create a vibrant and inviting live-work-play downtown community for Palmetto Bay, by stimulating mixed-use Transit Oriented Development(TOD)along the South Dade Transitway through a long-term(40-50 year)vision of the Palmetto Bay downtown area. James understands that Beach residents also have very different mobility needs:they have reached different points in their lives, reflect different cultural backgrounds, live in neighborhoods with multiple street types and land 2017-126-KB 114 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER use patterns, and take very different routes to work. He also knows that there is no silver bullet to solving all of the Beach's transportation needs and he recognizes the benefits of providing more mobility choices than the Beach has now.To gain consensus on these complex transportation issues,James focuses on the"carrots"and the"sticks", improving alternative transportation options on one hand, and creating disincentives to driving alone on the other. Put the options in front of the people, entice them with the cost-benefit and ease of use approach, and to let them decide what is best for them at that moment in time.This is the"carrot"and the"stick"approach! Because James has performed work on the Beach, he recognize it as a complex ecosystem with varying transportation needs that are context-sensitive.The Beach's transport network knows no stasis and is in constant flux. Several factors influence the Beach's travel network,such as, neighborhood type,time of day peaks,age and physical ability of citizen population, mix of retail options available by distance, historical land-use patterns. James served as the General Transportation Planning and/or Traffic Engineering Consultant for more than 20 municipalities in South Florida, most recently: 1. Village of Palmetto Bay, General Transportation Planning Consultant(2014—2017) I Contact: Edward Silva, Village Manager, 305-259-1234,esilva@palmettobay-fl.gov 2. Town of Cutler Bay, General Engineering Contract(2014-2017) I Contact:Alfredo Quintero, Public Works Director, 305-234-4262, aquintero@cutlerbay-fl.gov 3. City of South Miami, Professional General Engineering and Architectural Services(2013-2017) I Contact: Shari Kamali, Deputy City Manager, 305-668-2510, skamali@southmiamifl.gov 4. Town of Miami Lakes, General Engineering Contract(2012-2017) I Contact: Darby Delsalle, Director Planning and Zoning, 305-364-6100,delsalleD@miamilakes-fl.gov 5. City of Doral,General Engineering Contract(2015-2017) I Contact:Jorge Gomez, City Engineer, 305-593- 6740,Jorge.gomez@cityofdoral.com 6. Miami Shores Village,Villagewide Traffic Consultant(2015-2017) I Contact:Tom Benton,Village Manager, 305-762-4851, bentonT@miamishoresvillage.com 7. City of Parkland, General Engineering Consultant(2016-2017) I Contact: Sowande Johnson, City Engineer, 954-753-5040, sjohnson@cityofparkland.org 8. City of Aventura,Traffic Engineering Services(2015-2017) I Contact:Joanne Carr, Community Development Director, 305-466-8940,jcarr@cityofaventura.com James is supported by a more than 550 experienced Lochner professionals that specialize in all modes of innovative, creative, state-of-the-art,cost-effective transportation solutions in transportation planning,traffic engineering, roadway design, rail and transit, structures, environmental, aviation, construction, and alternative delivery. James and the Lochner Team are supported by a deep pool of well-established technically capable firms for this contract, providing redundancy in all areas of the scope of services and the ability to simultaneously work on multiple task work orders in order to fulfill the City's"Key Intended Outcomes"in the Strategic Plan and the goals'of both the City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan and the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan. Cambridge Systematics(CS)was founded in 1972 by four Massachusetts Institute of CAMBRIDGE Technology professors and a colleague who shared an understanding that transportation's SYSTEMATICS greatest challenges call for thoughtful,objective, research-based solutions.They are internationally recognized for state-of-the-industry data, models and forecasts for some of the world's most challenging and visible transportation projects.They have been involved in long range and short range multimodal transportation planning in South Florida for over 15 years,supporting the Florida Department of Transportation,the three south Florida Metropolitan Planning Organizations, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority(operator of Tri-Rail), and local county and municipal agencies.They supported FDOT in developing the Florida Transportation Plan which forms the blueprint for transportation in the State for 2060, including evaluating significant new"Future Corridors"connecting key economic regions of Florida.They also supported development of the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Florida, including developing a Regional Transit Vision for the three-county area. 2017-126-KB 115 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITYOF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R Metric Engineering, Inc. (MEI)was founded in 1976 on the principle of providing personalized Ni:11 WWI consulting engineering services,specializing in civil and transportation projects. Metric has successfully completed numerous large,complex transportation projects in the United States and abroad.Their multi-disciplinary workforce and strategically located regional offices enable us to provide both maximized local responsiveness and a diversified technical base.Their clients include local,county,state and foreign governments, as well as private clients. Much of their success in growing and diversifying can be attributed to our efforts to understand clients' emerging needs,as well as the expanding capabilities of our professionals. They are known for projects"Done right the first time and every time." MEI will support the team with services in transportation design, ITS/traffic operations, planning/PD&E, and environmental. ba Bermello Ajamil&Partners Inc. (B&A)is a global interdisciplinary A/E firm established in 1939. B&A incorporates two brilliant design&engineering forces,Willy Bermello and Luis Ajamil, +s inc whom have collectively merged the company into the firm it is known for today. Offering services Berme Asernthat include architecture,engineering, planning, landscape architecture, interior design, and construction services, B&A serves various market sectors consisting of municipal, maritime, aviation,commercial, residential, healthcare, education, and transportation. Headquartered in Miami,the firm operates on six continents from its offices in Florida, New York, and Denmark and is highly recognized for its award-winning designs and extraordinary service of over our 75 years of experience. ♦ PlusUrbia Design(PLUS)is an award-winning, Miami-based studio with expertise in land-use ♦. planning. urban design, public engagement,visualization,transit-oriented development,zoning code ♦ creation,financial mechanisms, and corridor master planning.Their studio applies context-sensitive PLUSURBIA solutions to a full range of public and private sector projects in North, South and Central America as well as China and the Middle East.The firm's Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization District earned national, statewide, and regional awards from the American Planning Association.PlusUrbia's Wynwood Walls Garden won the Urban Land Institute's Southeast Florida/Caribbean Chapter Vision Award. It won China's prestigious KINPAN award for Songhua Lake Resort. Firm founder Juan Mullerat,Assoc.AIA,APA, NCI, CNU,was awarded the Urban Designer of the Year by the Miami Chapter of the American Institute of Architects. Fehr&Peers Transportation Consultants(FPT)has specialized in providing F E H R ) PEERS DC transportation planning and engineering services to public and private sector clients since 1985. Fehr&Peers is at the forefront of sustainable transportation with a focus on measuring/quantifying key outcomes of multimodal investment and smart growth development.They develop creative, cost-effective, and results-oriented solutions to planning and design problems associated with all modes of transportation.They offer clients the right combination of leading-edge technical skills and extensive knowledge of the communities in which we work to deliver comprehensive solutions and superior client service.They are nationally-recognized experts who routinely publish original research, serve on national committees, and teach courses to others in the industry;all while maintaining their commitment to translating those techniques into practical solutions. Fehr&Peers takes a creative, data-driven approach to each of our practice areas;travel behavior and forecasting, multimodal operations and simulation,transit planning, bicycle and pedestrian planning,sustainable transportation, and freight systems and airports. G ri d ics Gridics LLC(GRID)is a land use, real estate,and technology firm with a mission is to empower clients to make the most informed decisions through the use of data and analytics.Their applications deliver greater transparency and provide unique insights into land use and real estate.Through the use of their Zonar cloud-based application,they can assimilate GIS data, property records, and layers of zoning regulations to provide accurate zoning information and 3-D massing diagrams for individual land parcels, assemblages,transit corridors, and districts. Using this application,the City of Miami Beach can efficiently analyze their zoning codes,visualize proposed land use scenarios, master plan districts,and plan better for the Beach by analyzing existing and proposed land use changes and their effects on development potential, infrastructure needs, property valuations,transportation demand, and more. 2017-126-KB 116 ab 2 I Experience & Qualificati•` y ""� Y ^T CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC HN ER W W � +a TL+a,(WTL), created in 2009, brings 32 years of experience in real estate and economic development consulting on behalf of public and private clients, including municipal and state governments, institutions, investment funds and real estate developers. Managing Principal W.Thomas/Tom Lavash and a former principal/partner with ERA(acquired by AECOM), has worked on 450 projects across the United States. He directs market, financial feasibility,and economic studies for all types of real estate,with an emphasis on mixed-use, downtown and waterfront,commercial districts and in-town neighborhoods, and new urbanist in-fill and transit-oriented development(TOD)projects. The firm's practice is focused in the following areas: market and financial feasibility studies for all land uses; development programming for mixed-use projects; neighborhood-and corridor-commercial district revitalization strategies; and implementation/funding strategies, particularly the use of tax increment financing(TIF). For municipalities and institutions,WTL+a serves as a key advisor on multi-disciplined teams focusing on neighborhood and commercial revitalization, business recruitment and retention, economic impacts, land use and regulatory policies, implementation strategies,and cost/benefit studies.The firm's transportation experience includes: economic development strategies for corridor transit plans; economic impacts of transit alternatives; and TOD, with projects in eight states focused on real estate market potentials, economic viability, station area planning, and funding strategies for development surrounding rail stations. The firm's practice is focused in three core areas: • Real Estate Markets&Land Economics • Market/Development Potentials • Master Planning&Land Use Programming • Development Advisory Services • Real Estate Financial Feasibility&Funding Mechanisms • Pro Forma/Investment Analysis • Economic&Fiscal Impacts • Tax Increment Financing(TIF)Analysis • Implementation Strategies • Economic Development Strategies • Developer RFQs/RFPs • Developer Ranking&Selection Services B tC Boothe Transit Consulting, LLC(BTC)is led by President Jeff Boothe who has spent nearly forty years in the public transit industry. He combines deep knowledge of the public transit industry; Boothe r,maconsuuc decades shaping federal laws, regulations and guidance that govern public transit; counseling ltIngclients on federal compliance issues; substantial understanding of the federal government as a Congressional staffer advising former United States Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Mark O. Hatfield to advance the first light rail project in Portland, Oregon through the appropriations and federal approval process, as the leader of two major transit industry coalitions, and in the representation of many clients before the Department of Transportation, and the Federal Transit Administration and,a proven record of providing strategic guidance to clients seeking to secure federal funding and finance for capital projects through the Capital Investment Grants(CIG)program.Services offered by BTC include: • Strategic advisory services to transit agencies,cities and project sponsors seeking to advance transit capital investments,including project prioritization, identifying funding options, and,project finance • Advise on complying with federal laws, regulations and guidance impacting project approvals, project finance, procurement, and Buy America • Technical assistance regarding the securing funding under the CIG program, including Core Capacity, New Starts, and Small Starts BTC was formed in May 2015 after Boothe spent nearly thirty years in private legal practice and 10 years on Capitol Hill. 2017-126-KB 117 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER ACE Public Relations Group, LLC(ACE)is a Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE) AcE firm,with a fully operational office in Hollywood, Florida, and a team of bilingual(English/Spanish) PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUP professionals based locally in Miami-Dade County.ACE provides marketing, public relations,and public involvement services to government agencies, municipalities, and private organizations. Their three principles for successfully implementing effective public involvement programs include raising AWARENESS, sharing information through multiple COMMUNICATION channels and providing EDUCATION to our targeted audience.Thus, building trust through two-way communications.The ACE team has been strategically assembled to provide the City of Miami Beach a seasoned and reputable staff with proven experience on major transportation projects.They have a deep understanding of the City of Miami Beach operations and management and their staff brings extensive experience in South Florida including overseeing the Public Involvement efforts for Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)District Four 1-595 Express Lanes Corridor Improvements Project, the largest Public, Private, Partnership(P3)project in the State of Florida. In addition,they have also provided community outreach and public involvement services for the City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects,the Florida Department of Transportation, District Four and District Six, and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. Pit MAGBE Consulting Services, Inc. (MCS)is a woman-owned minority firm,founded in 1996 AGBE with offices in Miami-Dade County.They have designed and executed successful campaigns . and projects that have changed public opinion and influenced behavior for local,State and Federal clients.They provide services in the areas of marketing, media and public information specializing in public involvement, grassroots outreach, neighborhood advocacy, public relations,job fairs, business minority outreach, special events&festivals, survey&market research and public opinion polling. MAGBE possess vast experience in grant, proposal&contract,as well as program implementation and management services. MCS President, Magali Abad, has more than 35 years serving the South Florida community and is an experienced project manager with expert community relations and grass roots expertise. She is well-regarded in both the Hispanic/ Latino and African American/Caribbean communities. Director of Government Affairs Irela Bague has 20 years serving the South Florida community. She is an accomplished public relations, government affairs, and business development specialist. Ms. Bague is a well-respected community leader currently serving on the National Parks Conservation Association's Regional Council is Past Chair of the Resiliency Committee of the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce, a founding member of Resiliency Florida and serves on the Board of Directors of Florida Water Advocates. M.G. Manuel G.Vera&Associates Inc. (MGV)is a qualified DBE, SBE, MBE,and CBE survey and �Lr, .VERA mapping firm. MGV was established in Miami-Dade County in 1977,with offices located in &ASSOCIATES,Inc. Miami Dade County(CORPORATE), Central Florida office located in Orange County,and an office in Jupiter, Florida. Survey and mapping is what they have specialized in and is all they do. In over our 40 years of existence,there has not been a survey task,terrain,or problem they have not seen. MGV is a unique firm, in that it has the capability and technology of their competitors,but their principles are patterned by a family business with a service oriented and sound quality control ideology.This ideology is the foundation for our firm, and the reason MGV is revered as one of the premier survey firms in South Florida. MGV is dedicated and committed to providing excellent service and complete client satisfaction. MGV has a highly-trained staff of professional surveyors and associates with extensive experience in a wide range of surveying and mapping services. Tierra South Florida(TSF)provides a complete range of geotechnical engineering services, St�errc� B O V T N i L O R I D• including geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing, inspections, and specialty testing.Their geotechnical design solutions define and reduce construction and long-term performance risks.Whether buildings,airport facilities, transportation systems, landfills,dams, or other civil and private projects,their engineers have the experience and expertise to handle the most technically demanding projects.TSF also owns a large,diverse fleet of eight drill rigs with automatic hammers(truck-mounted,track- mounted, rotary,tripod,AN, barge/overwater)capable of drilling in challenging conditions whether remote, soft, marshy, over-water,difficult access or environmentally sensitive areas.They employee MOT(Maintenance of Traffic) certified staff to safely perform drilling services in high traffic areas. 2017-126-KB 118 Tab 2 ( Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R 1�TT� Eland Engineering, Inc. (EEO,founded in 2009, is a professional engineering firm specializing .� ,L y 7 in planning,design, integration, and construction management of Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)and advanced technology solutions.They help clients to develop innovative, cost effective engineering and the cutting edge technology solutions that enhance the mobility and safety of transportation infrastructures. Eland is currently pre-qualified with the FDOT to perform all of the four categories in the field of ITS and is certified as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)/Small Business (SBE)through FDOT. Eland provides our team with resilient expertise in the specialized ITS systems.They have 30 engineers, network specialists and computer professionals that are dedicated to provide ITS solutions. Eland staff members are highly experienced in all elements of ITS, such as fiber optic and wireless communication technologies, CCTV cameras, dynamic message signs,vehicle detection stations,toll collection, and IP/Ethernet network architectures. 4# WALKER Walker Parking Consultants(WPC)is global leader,specializing in parking analysis, PARKING CONSULTANTS management, planning and parking facility design and has been leading the industry for over 50 years.They have more than 250 professionals, many with decades of hands- on parking design and operations management experience enabling them to go beyond the simple theoretic assumptions to arrive at meaningful conclusions and recommendations that will enhance parking operations in the City of Miami Beach.Their services include market analysis,feasibility studies, parking management consulting, parking master planning and site analysis, parking garage design and restoration engineering.Walker has performed more than 3,000 parking studies, designed more than 2,500 parking structures and provided restoration design for more than 2,500 parking structures. CloudParc(CP)is new company that provides real time data capture,digestion and distribution allowing the Beach to keep constant tabs on the street,facilities, etc. for multiple purposes and ClOmultiple types of users.They provide the"missing link"for connectivity between transportation, U7Parc parking, and other smart infrastructure.The CloudParc parking application is a fully automated pay by plate parking system. CloudParc is a smart city platform that uses advanced machine vision and artificial intelligence to automate the entire parking lifecycle including detect parking space availability, add dynamic and variable pricing, meter automatically, capture and enforce parking violations,collect payment, and more as well as track real time traffic and incident data via mobile apps, and provide security/surveillance,private intelligence and many other smart city applications(beyond parking)via third parties through the CloudParc API. With CloudParc,the consumer can park quickly and go, paying for exactly what they use to the minute.The Beach collects what it deserves. Convenience and cash,total win-win.This is the first parking system that can offer this level of smart city hub convenience. CloudParc's platform increases capture and enforcement rates substantially while lowering costs.Their technology creates a user-friendly atmosphere for drivers, allowing them to navigate into parking spots quicker,thus alleviating congestion, and automate their payments. Handicapped and permitted drivers have the added benefit with automatic enforcement of ensuring their spaces remain reserved for their use. The decrease in traffic through more efficient and accurate parking information is beneficial to both drivers and businesses, and has been proven to increase local GDP while providing socially responsible benefits to bikers and pedestrians. Ecostata Services, Inc. (ESI)was founded in 2010 and builds on 26 years'experience in the 0 EC OSTR TA private,government, and non-profit sectors creating funding solutions.Their primary service S E RV I c E' is geared to organizations facing shortages in their funding streams or that are looking for ways to grow. Ecostrata will work to identify the City's needs first, rather than attempting to fit an available resource to that you,ensuring a focus geared to the City's unique needs. From grants,to government services,to general fundraising, Ecostrata is here to help the City of Miami Beach. Ecostrata's Founder and President, Robert Ruano has over 26 years of management experience, both in the private and public sector. His experience includes many years in City of Miami government,overseeing all grant applications and environmental initiatives.Among his accomplishments are a successful state grant that saved six acres of prime urban green space from development and the completion of a climate action plan that put the city on the path to sustainability. Since founding Ecostrata Services in 2010, he has worked with nonprofits, municipalities and private entities looking for funding or access to government programs. He is familiar with local, state,federal and foundation grant programs in a variety of functional areas. He serves on the USDA's National Urban&Community Forestry 2017-126-KB 1 19 Iab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Advisory Council, Miami-Dade County's Planning Advisory Board, and Coral Gables Parks&Recreation Advisory Board. He is also a board member and was the Founding Chairman of Bike Walk Coral Gables and is a member of the Green Mobility Network. 1 Quality Counts(QC)is a national full-service transportation data collection firm that specializes in a video data collection and has put in the effort to perfect its approach and procedures to confidently be able to provide the most accurate,time-efficient, and cost-efficient product its clients demand. For over a decade, QC has been local to South Florida area, providing data collection services to FDOT District 4 and 6,the City of Miami Beach,the University of Miami and plenty of private engineering firms of all shapes and sizes throughout the area. Beyond using video for turning movements, queue studies, delay studies, and OD studies, QC offers a full array of transportation data collection services, including Bluetooth data collection, mainline radar traffic counts,traditional tube counts, and surveys,such as travel time runs, parking lot studies,and more. Quality Counts has the local and national resources to perform studies of any size and complexity with little lead time and swift turnaround. ! • , . 1 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER 2.2. 1 SUMMARY OF PROJECT MANAGER AND TASK LEADERS EXPERIENCE 2.2.2 TEAM EXPERIENCE 1 . Transportation Planning James E. Spinks III, PE, PTOE, our Lochner Project Manager, 4• , leads the Transportation Planning task, as we specialize in - — planning for transportation and livability,with the technical expertise to provide a reliable, convenient, safe, and connected / '�� multi-modal network throughout the entire Beach.James has ,� -A4 performed similar services for more than 20 municipalities S A - throughout the South Florida area; including the City of MiamiruN .. Beach on the North Shore Neighborhood Improvements Project t ► MD,N. NOW 0 where he served as the Senior Traffic Engineer implementing the City's BODR designed the planned improvements, including traffic analysis,character landscaping, streetscapes, parking, lighting,ADA access, and waterline replacement for more than eight miles of urban neighborhood corridors. He has developedAIL citywide traffic calming master plans for numerous municipalities and recently served as the Project Manager to the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO),where he managed the Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan,the 2015 and 2016 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Plans, and the Bike Friendly Miami-Dade Plan. In addition,James also has experience providing site plan reviews,agency comprehensive plan development, traffic impact study preparation and reviews.James knows with the Miami-Dade County permitting agencies and procedures, as well as, FDOT, and he has established relationships with the agency's review and permitting staff and understands their expected standards and procedures, ensuring a smooth and quick approval process for any type of project. Most, recently James was the lead Traffic Engineer/Transportation Planner for the Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan,which received the 2015 State of Florida Planning and Zoning Board Award.This project served as the Vision of the Downtown Redevelopment Task Force(DRTF),formed by the Village Manager, Edward Silva,and the Village Council.The DRTF charged the consultant team with bringing more business tax revenue to the Village,to create a vibrant and inviting live-work-play downtown community for Palmetto Bay, by stimulating mixed-use Transit Oriented Development(TOD)along the South Dade Transitway through a long-term(40-50 year)vision of the Palmetto Bay downtown area. 2017-126-KB 121 Tab 2I Experience &Qualifications II'i CITYOF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER James is upported by more than 550 experienced Lochner professionals that specialize in a full range of Transportation Planning services, including: • Project Development and Environment(PD&E)Studies • Transit Capacity&Quality of Service Assessments • Legislative/Regulative/Policy Analysis • Multi-Modal Transportation Studies • Multimodal Analysis and Planning • Park and Ride Lot Assessment • Freight Assessments and Studies • Preliminary Concept Studies • Systems Planning • Project Traffic/Travel Demand Forecasting • Subarea/Transportation Corridor Planning Studies • Multimodal Level of Service(LOS)Analysis • Land Planning/Engineering • Bicycle Pedestrian&Trail Master Planning • Transportation Statistics • Pedestrian&Bicycle Design Innovations • Site Plan Development Review • Bike Share Planning&Design • Comprehensive Plans • Wayfinding Planning&Design • EAR Based Amendments • Health Impact Analysis • Traffic Impact Study Preparation/Review • Complete Streets Planning and Design • Access Management/Functional Classifications • Safe Routes to Schools • Complete Streets • Bikeway Design, Plans, Specifications&Estimates • Community Outreach/Public Involvement • Safe Routes to Transit • Congestion Management Planning • Bicycle&Pedestrian Forecasting&GIS Analysis • Congestion Pricing and Managed Lanes Travel • Traffic Calming Master Plans • Demand Analysis • Site Plan Development Review • Data Mining/Management • Transit Stop Location and Design Analysis • Interchange Access Request(IMRs, IJRs, IOARs. • Trail Networks&Multi-use Paths Level of Service SIMRs) Analysis • Site Impact and Growth Management Reviews • Smart Growth • Modal Application • Livable Cities • Multi-Modal Corridor Analysis • Community Outreach Lochner professionals include Robert Romig,who formerly served as principal policy advisor to the Florida Transportation Commission and has provided policy and technical expertise on federal, state,and metropolitan planning programs and plans including the Florida Transportation Plan,the Florida Strategic Intermodal System Plan,the Florida's planning and environmental programs and processes. Matthew Wey, PE, PTOE,with 19 years of experience who has managed both DW SIS and DW Systems Planning contracts for FDOT, conducting planning, corridor transportation studies and feasibility studies for bicycle, pedestrian,transit,traffic management. Lara Bouck, PE,AICP, an experienced planner with experience conducting regional corridor transportation use evaluations for consideration of transit,with the purpose of identifying mobility improvements.Andrea Ostrodka, AICP, LEED AP,who recently served as the Director of Planning&Development for the Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority.The Lochner Team will be supported by Cambridge Systematics and Metric Engineering in area. Metric Engineering has an extensive amount of experience in Transportation Planning and design of the following important pedestrian/bicyclists access/safety features: special crosswalk markings, overhead signage,bulb- outs, midblock crossings, refuge islands, pedestrian corrals,and over/underpasses. Multimodal considerations are essential to guarantee the proper balance between transportation mobility,connectivity and safety within the "Complete Streets"concept.They have extensive experience in conducting bicycle and pedestrian studies for all users within suburban environments and heavily congested urban settings. Lochner Team member Cambridge Systematics(CS)has been involved in long range and short range multimodal transportation planning in South Florida for over 15 years, supporting the Florida Department of Transportation,the three south Florida Metropolitan Planning Organizations, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority(operator of Tri-Rail)and local county and municipal agencies.They supported FDOT in developing the Florida Transportation Plan which forms the blueprint for transportation in the State for 2060,including evaluating significant new"Future Corridors"connecting key economic regions of Florida.They also supported development of the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Florida, including developing a Regional Transit Vision for the three-county area. 2017-126-KB 122 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER At the heart of our Cambridge Systematics transportation planning analysis is the application of the Southeast Regional Planning Model(SERPM), based on extensive travel characteristics data.They are currently leading the effort to update the model(SERPM 8)for the 2045 planning cycle. Gabriela Garcia, PE, Metric Engineering, currently serves as Project Engineer for transportation planning and traffic operations projects. Her experience includes roadway, PD&E Studies and NEPA documentation, alternatives development, public involvement, cost estimating, and traffic operations. Recent studies include the US-27/SR 25/ Okeechobee Road from NW 79th Avenue to SR 997/Krome Avenue Corridor Study, CR 510 PD&E Study from CR 512 to 58th Avenue,SR 874(Don Shula Expressway)Ramp Connector PD&E Study for Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and the SR 292 PD&E Study in Escambia County that involved adding lanes, improving turning movements, adding bike lanes and pedestrian facilities, developing streetscape enhancements, on-street parking, and hardscaping. Sijong Jo, PhD, Metric Engineering, has an extensive background in all phases of traffic engineering and transportation modeling. He is especially proficient in computer modeling,traffic operation analysis,traffic and revenue forecasts and authored several publications. He recently conducted the on-board travel survey of SFRTA Tri-Rail riders for the purpose of capturing travel patterns, socio-economic characteristics, and customer opinions and preferences for the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority(SFRTA).The primary goal of this survey effort was to gather information related to current ridership patterns and identify areas for improvements to support SFRTA's FY 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan(TDP), Major Update. In addition, he recently evaluated travel characteristics,travel time and speed, identified operational deficiencies for a potential new route along the Douglas Road Corridor from the Miami Intermodal Center(MIC)to Coral Gables/Coconut Grove area for the Miami-Dade TPO. Peter Haliburton,CEng, Cambridge Systematics, and his firm will also support the Lochner Team with experience in transit planning,transportation planning,transportation engineering,civil engineering,corridor, and traffic impact studies, and community outreach. Peter has managed dozens of transportation planning and engineering projects with diverse private and public clients over the past 20 years, including the FDOT District 4Transportation Planning and Multimodal Corridor Studies Contract, FDOT District 4 TSM&O Master Plan,the FDOT District 6 Corridor Studies and the FDOT District 4 Districtwide Transit Corridor Project,where he focused on project development for three potential Federal Transit Administration(FTA) New Starts fixed guideway transit projects in the Fort Lauderdale area; the Florida East-Coast Railway(FEC)Corridor Study, Central Broward Transit, and Downtown Fort Lauderdale Streetcar. Dr. Peng Zhu, Cambridge Systematics, has experience in traffic simulation,transportation planning and operations. He has worked on various projects of subarea and corridor planning,transportation plans, multimodal transportation studies, Intelligent Transportation Systems planning and implementation studies,traffic and revenue studies, and traffic simulation studies. Housing Option 2. Smart GrowthNear rWork and Amenities Conserves 'rrw.pcit an Smart Growth improves accessibility for non-drivers and encourages Resources CROW'S • the development of more compact, pedestrian-friendly,transit-oriented communities,where residents need to drive less. Smart Growth Matthew Ridgway,AICP, PTP of Fehr&Peers leads Smart Growth. Fehr& RrsItelizes Peers uses data analytics for Smart Growth.Their ASAP Platform produces Exisnng ftiss better data, better metrics and provide better decisions. More data is C0mmun available than ever before, but that doesn't necessarily mean that all data Encourages has value for transportation planning purposes. In fact, much of it does not, Re-use and some can even be counter-productive to sound decision-making. Fehr 2017-126-KB 123 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R &Peers will help the City benefit from the vast knowledge they have gained in ensuring that the data being used is accurate and appropriate for the intended use. Key legislation such as MAP 21 are re-shaping policy and catalyzing change in the way we measure travel behavior. Fehr&Peers has developed quick-response tools that enable them to accurately compute and apply these metrics in the Miami Beach community.Amid scarce resources and rapid technological and demographic change, decision-making about transportation investment has never been more challenging. Fehr&Peers has a track record of leveraging better data and better metrics to support thoughtful and informed investment decisions. To answer the questions: • New data sources are emerging, but which ones are truly accurate and useful for planning our transportation systems? • New metrics are being used to measure travel behavior and its associated impacts, but how do we compute them using the latest data and analytical techniques? • New policy paradigms are developing around transportation and land use, but how do we make the decisions that best achieve the desired change? Fehr&Peers launched their ASAP Initiative to help their clients answer these kinds of questions. Since that time,they have conducted a great deal of research and helped many of our clients navigate this period of evolutionary change. Perhaps the most important conclusion of our efforts thus far can best be summed up by the phrase Better Data, Better Metrics, Better Decisions. Tools such as MXD+,Vision Zero analysis,and Big Data analysis have helped Fehr&Peers provide better data analytics to their clients.Their MXD+tool quantifies Mixed-Use Development(MDX)Trip Generation and utilizes research from two major studies to more accurately predict vehicle trip generation from mixed-use developments. These studies identify key relationships between the mode of travel and the built environment. Semantics are important and Fehr&Peers understands that: 1. Mixed-use development(or MXD)is a generic term for land use strategies 2. In 2010, Fehr&Peers partnered with the US EPA to create a MXD tool 3. Since then, Fehr&Peers continues to advance our proprietary MXD+tool to be the best one in the industry In addition, Fehr&Peers leverages Big Data and their MXD+tool with their MainStreet tool to provide insight about trips by person, not just by auto,for a more complete picture of trip generation by all users; providing a full accounting of on-site and surrounding effects of Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT). The Mainstreet tool is one of the most accurate estimation tools that exists today and it accelerates accuracy and sensitivity in vehicle trip generation. In turn, higher accuracy means more environmental sensitivity,fewer needs for mitigation, more right-sized developments,and generally more predictable outcomes.This tool will help the Lochner Team provide the most accurate and valuable transportation planning and forecasting services on this contract. Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries,while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. COMMIT O g�rig O — / What sets a Vision Zero City apart? ALM 0 O Dz. Etl A mindset that acknowledges traffic deaths and injuries are preventable.This "- understanding allows cities to approach prioritizing projects differently-not only 1111 .VISION ZERO addressing current problems, but proactively predicting and preventing future ' O concerns.Tackling the complex challenge of traffic safety requires reaching ANALYZE across multiple disciplines,working together to dig into data differently, and PRIORITIZE engaging the community. o/ Mame 2017-126-KB 124 I :Tab 2 ( E "i - ience & Qualificatio , CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Fehr&Peers have worked with the cities of San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Sacramento to help them plan and implement their Vision Zero programs.They led a robust, data-driven effort to identify the leading causes of traffic injuries and match efficient and cost-effective engineering countermeasures to address the safety challenges.They also facilitated a scenario planning process with multi-agency stakeholders to develop a prioritized list of Vision Zero projects. Fehr&Peers project awards and presentations: • "Taking Meaningful Action on Vision Zero,"APA National Planning Conference(2017) • "Safe Streets Save Lives,"Vision Zero Cities(2017) • ITE Vision Zero Task Force-Steering Committee and Technical Working Group • "Vanishing Point:Vision Zero,"ITE Annual Meeting(2016) • TRB Pedestrian Committee Best Paper Award(2015) • "Pedestrian Safety Evaluation&Measurement,"TRB Annual Meeting(2015) • ITE Pedestrian and Bicycle Standing Committee Best Project Award(2015) • "Vision Zero-Make this Vital Policy Your City's MO",Association of Pedestrian&Bicycle Professionals Professional Development Seminar(2015) • "Vision Zero for Pedestrian Safety: New Thinking from San Francisco and New York", Pro Walk/Pro Bike/Pro Place(2015) • "Building Better Streets through Better Data:A Panel on Innovative Approaches to Tackling Pedestrian Safety,"APA California(2015) • APA Northern California Project of Merit(2014) • Pedestrian and Bike Safety Assessments(2008): Best Program(2009), ITE Planning Council; Best Practice (2009),APA California Matthew Ridgway,AICP, PTP, Principal, of Fehr&Peers is a national expert and has been involved in many of Fehr&Peers' highest visibility and most complex multi-modal projects. His key strength is his broad background and multi-modal approach,which he has applied to many bicycle,transit and pedestrian projects. Many of these projects have involved the development of tools for assessing unique performance measures and design of innovative transportation facilities. He has received countless awards for his work and has been involved with presentations of many Transportation Research Board(TRB)and ITE national publications for guidance on pedestrians, bikes, complete streets, smart growth, and many others. Recent projects include using Fehr&Peers mixed-use trip generation tool(MXD)to considering context sensitive solutions, develop a sustainable program, and smart parking alternatives for the District of Columbia Department of Transportation. In addition, he performed the alternatives analysis for the Sugarhouse Streetcar and Trails Project in Salt Lake City, UT and has developed Active Transportation Plans for a host of cities including Albany, Denver, El Cerrito, Emeryville, Fremont, Newark, Oakland, Pleasanton, Reno/Sparks, Richmond, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose,San Leandro,and Walnut Creek. Matthew will be supported by: Alex Rixey,AICP, Senior Transportation Planner, Fehr&Peers, has diverse project experience in travel demand modeling,transportation and parking studies, master plan and mobility element development, data analysis and visualization,and bike sharing system planning,with an emphasis on analyzing the effects of built environment and demographic characteristics on demand for all travel modes.Alex is proficient in the use of SAS, SPSS, and ArcGIS software,and has combined his passions for quantitative analysis and bicycling by developing a station-level bike sharing ridership model.Alex has also recently worked to develop multimodal transportation performance measures that incorporate land use,transportation, and accessibility factors for auto, transit, bicycle,and pedestrian modes as alternatives to the traditional Level of Service metric. Recent projects Alex has completed include the Downtown Dallas 360 Plan Update,which addresses issues of walkability, mobility,and urban design,among others.Alex recommended urban mobility principles, a street typology,and signature corridor design concepts to enhance streetscapes and mobility in Downtown Dallas. He conducted the first small area validation of the North Central Texas Council of Governments' regional travel demand model to reflect conditions in Downtown and used origin- destination big data from StreetLight to make significant adjustments to model trip lengths and travel patterns within and to Downtown,enabling the analysis of the effects of the land use and transportation network changes proposed in the Downtown Dallas 360 update. 2017 26-KB 125 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCH N ER Dana Weissman, Senior Transportation Planner, Fehr&Peers, has experience on a wide range of multimodal projects, including pedestrian and bicycle planning, safety, and research; park access and circulation;transit planning; and transportation impact assessment. Dana's particular focus is on multimodal safety and project prioritization. Dana led the high-profile Vision Zero project prioritization effort for the City of Los Angeles,as well as two pedestrian prioritization efforts with the City of San Francisco for their WalkFirst and Streetscape Prioritization projects. Dana has presented on Vision Zero and other innovative safety strategies at conferences across the United States. Her WalkFirst and Streetscape Prioritization projects won ITE and APA best project awards, and her Vision Zero paper was honored with Pedestrian Committee Best Paper Award at TRB in 2015. Recent projects include the San Francisco WalkFirst Pedestrian Safety CIP where created a prioritized pedestrian capital improvement project list to meet benchmarks outlined in the City's Pedestrian Strategy.The technical analysis used citywide pedestrian collision and injury data to understand the current nature of pedestrian crashes, profile different pedestrian crash types, determine the most effective countermeasures, and prioritize a strategy to treat the areas of greatest need for pedestrian infrastructure improvement. 2. Livable Cities A livable city is dedicated to improving transportation, land use, open space, and environmental policies and helps foster walkable, diverse, i . IV healthy, and green neighborhoods,where walking, bicycling,and transit ' , e are the best choices for most trips,where public spaces are beautiful, "j is well-designed, and well-maintained, and where housing is more - plentiful and more affordable.These types of initiatives will ensure that Miami Beach is a safer, healthier, and more accessible city. -. Jerry Walters, of Fehr&Peers leads Livable Cities. Fehr&Peers have developed the transportation elements of the EPA's Smart Growth " Database and have subsequently developed a Smart Growth Calculator for GSA and a number of tools and publications related to quantifying ' .�� greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions.They have contributed to dozens of Climate Action Plans.They also developed the Caltrans' Smart Mobility Framework, a foundational document that preceded subsequent si ' � updates to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual(focused on Complete Streets,for which they prepared and delivered trainings to all Caltrans districts); development/refinement of regional models to better incorporate smart growth sensitivities; and advising the California Governor's office on implementation of SB 743(the legislation that requires environmental documents to use VMT as a performance measure rather than LOS). The Lochner Team will serve as the"peoples"planners and will partner with the City of Miami Beach to create a livable community,where transportation decisions will help preserve affordable housing and neighborhood-serving small businesses. Miami Beach is full of artists with a rich history.Arts and artists improve urban life for the rest of us; it's hard to imagine City of Miami Beach without art, and it certainly wouldn't be a livable one.Artists and artisans and their spaces are essential to a diverse and robust local economy, and support other big sectors of the economy like tourism. Smart land use planning and other policies can create and sustain places for artists and art spaces in Miami Beach,even as we address transportation issues.Therefore, streetscape concepts and designs will be developed that incorporated/preserve art spaces. Because of the experience of our team,the Lochner Team has the ability to advocate to Miami-Dade County or the State for policy changes, programs, and projects,which will make Miami Beach more sustainable,livable, and equitable. Our team has championed complete streets projects, greenway network projects,smart parking projects and transit improvement projects;all while keeping neighborhoods and commercial areas vital, diverse, and walkable.We will work with the community to identify additional areas for open streets,car-free space,for community health and connection,for the people, by the people. 2017-126—KB 126 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R The Lochner Team has the ability to work directly with residents and businesses to make the Beach more livable, including helping establish planning and zoning changes responsive to Miami Beach needs,helping plan and secure funding for street and open space improvements,thereby helping businesses and community services thrive in the Beach. Miami Beach is a great city.Vibrant,walkable streets will continue to make the Beach more livable and sustainable. Public spaces can be created within or near the streets and with pedestrian-friendly building design and proper smart parking management;the Beach will embrace a sustainable"car-free"transportation system where walking, cycling, public transit, and car-sharing will allow greater density without sacrificing livability or sustainability. A few successful strategies for a more livable city that have worked are: • Reclaiming road space/lane repurposing for greening and livability • Tie streetscape improvements to new development • Green and restore front and rear areas of properties • Protects and/or build a greenway network, and allow transferred development rights to preserve open spaces Livability is at the Lochner Team's core values. • We develop transportation recommendations that respect the living planet, and are in harmony with the natural systems that sustain all life. • When available,we recommend the use of recycled, sustainable materials so that the earth's resources are used wisely,without compromising the well-being of future generations. • We engage with"the people"and promote the health and happiness of the residents, by providing transportation opportunities for quality, active living and multimodal experiences;that do not impose undue environmental burdens on residents or visitors. • Our public involvement campaigns are developed where residents are given the right to participate in transportation decisions which affect them, and alternatives are clear,transparent, and user-friendly. In our experience we have developed five fundamental aspects of great, livable cities: 1. Robust and complete neighborhoods 2.Accessibility and sustainable mobility 3.A diverse and resilient local economy 4. Vibrant public spaces 5. Affordability The Lochner Team will help the Beach make walking a joy, safe,comfortable and interesting, by encouraging quality sidewalks and transitions"between"building properties and streets by buffering pedestrians sidewalks/paths from traffic, reducing the speed of traffic on residential streets, and widening sidewalks.We will pay attention to all modes of transportation and to the quality of urban space that the transportation system supports. A livable, sustainable, and vital area depends on a robust, effective, and connected regional transit system, Baylink. The Beach has the benefit of being able to leverage your existing system,without it interfering with the local traffic alignment.With 10 stations planned on Miami Beach on Washington and Meridian Avenues, and 7th, 10th, and 14th Streets, Lincoln Road and the Miami Beach Convention Center.The Lochner Team is well positioned to coordinate with both FDOT and the TPO,on behalf of the City of Miami Beach,to ensure Baylink comes to reality. Miami Beach currently has 29.5 miles of bicycle network and 5 pedestrian bridges.Approximately 5.5%of residents' bike to work, 14%walk to work and 12%take other means,such as taxi, motorcycles or mopeds.This makes up more than 30%of resident trips,which is comparatively higher than most other cities. Miami Beach has a vision to further reduce the vehicle mode share and increase this number to nearly 50%, doubling the bicycle mode share. 2017-126-KB ( 27 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Miami Beach is a compact city and it can be assumed that most trips to work on the Beach, by beach residents are under five miles,therefore bicycling could be a much more useful and popular mode of transportation in the future. The goals and objectives of both the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan and the projects outlined in the Transportation Master Plan support these goals,with over 800 new locations for bicycle parking identified, along with bike lanes, protected bike lanes and bicycle boulevards programmed. While the roadway projects may have ample right-of-way, bicycle parking may prove to be challenging.The Beach currently utilizes the Citibike for bike share,which uses fixed docking stations. Infrastructure, operations and maintenance, and locations of the fixed docking stations may create difficulties.The result is limited number of stations,which also caps the number of riders and higher costs for the users.To fulfill the Beach's goal for bicycle parking, a new focus on newer technologies that are dockless. By not having docking stations,the Beach can increase available designated parking locations, improving both bike availability and convenience for the end- user, resulting in higher levels of ridership that can be scaled, neighborhood-by-neighborhood. Many of these new technologies are equipped with an app on your smart phone,where users can view bikes on the map,walk to the nearest bike,then use the app to unlock the bike to ride.These new systems eliminate docking stations and are secure with anti-theft lock and alarm,double kickstand for parking stability, and front lights.This creates a broadly distributed system,with bikes that are more accessible and affordable to all.The Lochner Team has established relationships with these vendors and can bring it to Miami Beach. Pedestrian and bicycle supportive street design techniques make transit faster,walking safer,and public life more pleasant. Jerry Walters, Chief Technical Officer, Fehr&Peers, leads the firm's Sustainability Practices,integrating transportation planning with sustainable climate,energy and quality of life. He has over thirty years' experience in transportation planning,engineering and travel forecasting.Jerry has served on Regional Targets Advisory Committee to the Air Resources Board on implementing California's landmark transportation/land use and climate law SB 375, and the American Public Transit Association(APIA)working group on national guidelines for estimating climate change impacts of transit, advisory committee for Caltrans' "Assessment of Local Models and Tools for Analyzing Smart-Growth Strategies,"and on the California Department of Housing and Community Development assessment"The Effect of Housing Near Transit Stations on Vehicle Trip Rates and Transit Trip Generation",the Southern California Association of Governments review panel on the regional economic impacts of State climate legislation, and on the California Transportation Commission working group on travel modeling guidelines for Regional Transportation Plans under law AB32.Traditional Neighborhood Design, Livable Streets-Jerry led transportation planning and conceptual design for Caltrans demonstration project on Context Sensitive Street Design on a segment of urban State highway, and for award-winning Palm Drive redesign and the Campus Drive and Sand Hill Road corridor street improvements at Stanford University. He was the study Advisor on Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Best Development Practices study and development of multimodal transportation Level of Service standards and led the development of the Aurora, Colorado street standards for urban centers and transit oriented development. Jeremy Klop,AICP, Principal, Fehr&Peers,has performed a wide range of multimodal planning and implementation projects across the United States.Through his combined expertise in travel demand forecasting and multimodal traffic operations, he has helped implement transportation projects in diverse settings such as high mountain Main Streets, economically challenged Midwestern towns, biomedical campuses,4,000+acre infill communities,thriving urban downtowns,and small transit villages throughout the Western US. He is known for working effectively with planning commissions,elected officials, advocacy groups, and multiple city departments to gain consensus on complex transportation planning issues. Recent projects include the Los Angeles Union Station Master Plan,which analyzed the relationship between transportation and land use.The multimodal approach included the interface between people arriving and connecting via all modes of travel and was focused on the experience and connection to the both the history and the future of this iconic station.Jeremy developed a management plan for parking, transit(rail and bus)enhancements, pedestrian and bicycle access enhancements, development trip generation analysis, alternatives development and evaluation for high speed rail integration. 2017-126-KB I 28 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Kevin Tilbury,AICP, Senior Associate, of Cambridge Systematics has nearly 20 years of integrated multimodal transportation and land use planning for government agency partners at the local, regional and state levels in Florida,the southeast and nationally. He excels and communicating complex data and analysis to non-technical stakeholder audiences. His work in Florida takes an integrated approach to mobility, including private vehicles, transit,walking and cycling. His interest and passion lies in understanding how the realms of land use and transportation can complement each other to create livable and functional places. 4. Complete Streets Complete Streets are streets for everyone.They are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, '. ,o• . ,rz including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders •.1,1:_ ¢ _, _ of all ages and abilities; regardless of age, ability, or mode of _ 7111 - transportation. Complete Streets make it easy to cross the A00 modes - street,walk to shops, and bicycle to work.They allow buses • to run on time and make it safe for people to walk to and from train stations. By adopting complete streets practices - • � : d and policies,the City of Miami Beach will ensure that every transportation project will make the street network better and v®" safer for drivers,transit users, pedestrians, and bicyclists— making the Beach a better place to live and visit. a� AN ablaze Y Bill Howell, PE, Lochner, leads Complete Streets.We disabiliti cia understand that complete streets empower the people.We recognize that the street network is a huge public asset, making up about 30%of Miami Beach's urban space.We have national experience helping municipalities leverage their street network asset in achieving economic and livability goals.When planning or designing a complete street, we consider all users with every street decision. Complete streets remove roadblocks to contributing socially and economically to society, becoming healthier through active living, doing something on a personal level to improve air quality, and improving family financial conditions. Complete Streets make it easier and safer to cross the street,walk to schools, and shops, bicycle to work or for pleasure, and access buses, as well as enable buses to run on time.They also increase land Small values. Beyond these benefits,the largest and most immediate benefit Additional Large effect may just be the ability to safely enjoy Miami Beach while walking, jogging, or riding our bikes. effort What does a Complete Street look like? complete Streets Po1icY Existing There is no singular design prescription for Complete Streets; each assets N one is unique and responds to its community context.A complete street may include:sidewalks, bike lanes(or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops,frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals,curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, roundabouts,and more. However, each complete street is tailored to achieve the communities'goals for that specific area or neighborhood. Complete Streets help create livable communities for various types of users, fin ° •E^ including children, people with disabilities, and older adults. Complete Streets a•ee1o° Utility Work Repaying improve equity,safety,and public health,while reducing transportation costs and Complete SWIMS M Insuring Met ownmortity soak aremnkteres traffic woes. with euk and MilleleINOSIS Reconstruction Restriping Sweeping Lochner works with the City of Miami Beach to ensure that city streets are designed Cross-Walk Timing and maintained as agreen, safe and attractivepublic spaces that support New Street. P walking, bicycling, and public transit.We support greater walkability,a citywide bicycle 2017-126-KB 129 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R network, and fast and reliable transit alternatives.We encourage buildings that activate and engage the sidewalks, and to reduce the impact of driveways and utilities on walkability. Our complete street projects create streets where walking, bicycling, and transit are the best choices for most trips and where we create beautiful and well- designed public spaces.We partnered with landscape architects that have experience crafting streetscapes that integrate street trees and landscaping,energy-and resource-efficiency standards,and that minimize impermeable pavements to improve the livability of the city while reducing environmental impacts and infrastructure costs. In high pedestrian and bicycle areas,the Lochner Team emphasizes streets that are designed around pedestrians and cyclists, and limit traffic to low speeds,where everyone, including children and seniors,can move safely on foot and on bike.These locations may include: • Wide or buffered sidewalks • Landscaping&Greenery • High-Emphasis or Enhanced Crosswalks • Green Bike Lanes • Protected Bike Lanes • Bicycle Intersection Treatments • Bicycle Parking Zones • Extended Curb Ramps for ADA Compliance • Traffic Calming Strategies • Residential Alleyways The Lochner Team is familiar with national Complete Streets practices, as well as the Draft Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)Complete Streets Handbook and new FDOT Design Manual.These documents will help us provide more context-sensitive roads by putting "the right street in the right place." We recognize that when developing complete streets concepts, protected bike lanes may not be appropriate for every bike street. In fact, protected bike lanes often produce difficulties at intersections,where bicycles need to merge with right-turning traffic.An innovative way to remove this conflict is to create shared space or bike boxes;where pedestrians, bike and "slow"moving cars share the right of way. The Lochner Team has been at the forefront of the complete street movement.We offer our clients planning, operations and design experience and help our clients envision complete streets,and implement the concept with context-sensitive design.The National Complete Streets Coalition has recognized the"Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality Collaborative's Best Practices for Complete Streets,"published in October 2005 and authored by Fehr&Peers, as an early success for the national complete streets movement.The final document, Creating Livable Streets"received a national award from the Environmental Protection Agency as an innovative approach to street design. Fehr&Peers has assisted the City of Los Angeles for the development of the Los Angeles Street Classification and Benchmarking System and the Complete Street Network as part of the Mobility Element Update. Fehr&Peers also participated in the development of street design guidelines for livable streets in the Portland, Oregon, and in the City of Denver, Colorado.We were the primary authors of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Innovative Bicycle Treatments and the California Pedestrian Safety Assessments(PSA)Guidebook, which incorporate best practices in pedestrian and bicycle safety engineering, planning,and policy,and is intended for use by a team of two evaluators.Assessments have been performed in nearly 50 California cities to date,with Fehr&Peers staff serving as the lead evaluator on all assessments.We have a proven record of successfully integrating character with the use of a street and helping communities visualize and create a safe and balanced streetscape environment. Bill Howell, PE, Lochner, has more than 35 years of experience in transportation engineering. He currently focuses on project development and environment(PD&E),corridor planning studies and complete streets. Bill has conducted and managed PD&E studies for dozens of state-level and local transportation improvement projects, often involving complex socioeconomic, environmental, cultural, and historical issues. Bill also has notable expertise in long-range planning, corridor studies, alternatives development and analysis, and conceptual design. Recent projects include the US 41, 10th Street to 14th Street Complete Streets Project in Sarasota, Florida;which received the 2014 FICE/FDOT Outstanding Special Project Award.This project involved replacement of two US 41 2017-126-KB 130 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R intersections with roundabouts, narrowing travel lanes, adding bike lanes and lowering design speed to calm traffic. In addition, context-sensitive design features(improvement of transit, bicycle,and pedestrian facilities)were also included. Jason Green AICP, Lochner, has a diverse background in urban and regional planning, project management, FTA program management, NEPA implementation, and public involvement. His areas of expertise include FTA programs and guidance, alternative development and analysis, existing conditions analysis, cultural and socioeconomic resource evaluation, environmental and land use compliance, and public involvement management. Mr.Green is experienced in managing FTA programs and developing materials that disseminate FTA circulars and guidance to educate and ensure compliance with federal law. In addition, he is experienced in all levels of NEPA compliance and documentation. He has assisted in leading regional land use and transportation visioning efforts, and has worked closely with municipalities throughout the state on a variety of land use and transportation issues and opportunities. Mr.Green has also been instrumental in expanding Lochner's transit program, including leading the development of a company-wide transit initiative business plan. Recent projects include the South Salt Lake Complete Streets Policy Workshop for the Wasatch Front Regional Council,where Jason conducted a series of workshops to enable the municipality to incorporate a Complete Streets policy into its downtown redevelopment plan.The workshops focused on the benefits of complete streets; South Salt Lake's strengths,weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges in relation to the adoption of a Complete Streets policy; key Complete Streets policy elements; How such policies fit into South Salt Lake's existing planning protocols; the identification of municipal procedures, policies, and plans that need to be changed to accommodate Complete Streets, and the creation of a framework for that change; and the development of a draft Complete Streets policy for South Salt Lake. Charlie Alexander, PE,AICP, Senior Associate, of Fehr and Peers is a national Complete Streets expert who specializes in complex multimodal transportation planning and engineering projects. In addition to Active Transportation projects, his project experience includes traffic operations, safety,transit planning,travel demand forecasting and traffic engineering design projects. Charlie applies this diverse experience to projects that require complex bicycle, pedestrian and transit design solutions;consent-building around modal tradeoffs; and strategic stakeholder and community engagement. He is a leader of Fehr&Peers'companywide Bicycle&Pedestrian Discipline Group and teaches courses on Complete Streets to master's students and other practitioners through the University of Colorado, Denver,the National Complete Streets Coalition and the University of California, Berkeley. In addition to his Complete Streets work, Charlie has completed numerous campus planning and design projects for universities throughout Colorado and California including serving as the on-call traffic engineer for the University of California, Davis where he regularly developed solutions to resolve transportation-related issues for the 35,000-student campus. Alex Rixey,AICP, Senior Transportation Planner, of Fehr and Peers has diverse project experience in travel demand modeling,transportation and parking studies, master plan and mobility element development, data analysis and visualization, and bikesharing system planning,with an emphasis on analyzing the effects of built environment and demographic characteristics on demand for all travel modes.Alex is proficient in the use of SAS, SPSS, and ArcGIS software, and has combined his passions for quantitative analysis and bicycling by developing a station-level bike sharing ridership model.Alex has also recently worked to develop multimodal transportation performance measures that incorporate land use,transportation,and accessibility factors for auto,transit, bicycle, and pedestrian modes as alternatives to the traditional Level of Service metric.Alex is actively the Vice Chair of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Pedestrian and Bicycle Council and Secretary of the Complete Streets Council. Recent projects include the Downtown Dallas 360 Plan Update,which addresses issues of walkability, mobility, and urban design,among others.Alex recommended Urban Mobility Principles,a Street Typology,and Signature Corridor design concepts to enhance streetscapes and mobility in Downtown Dallas. He conducted the first small area validation of the North Central Texas Council of Governments' regional travel demand model to reflect conditions in Downtown and used origin-destination big data from StreetLight to make significant adjustments to model trip lengths and travel patterns within and to Downtown, enabling the analysis of the effects of the land use and transportation network changes proposed in the Downtown Dallas 360 update. 2017-126-KB 1 31 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER 5. Integration of Transportation and Land Use Karen Kiselewski,AICP of Cambridge Systematics leads the integration of transportation and land use. Cambridge Systematics has extensive experience integrating transportation and land use.They recognize that better integrating land use,transportation,and public infrastructure planning,will help the City of Miami Beach achieve your housing goals while preserving livability, mobility, and fiscal3111. sustainability,which improves the planning processes to reduce wasted effort and improve project quality, using existing infrastructure investments wisely and effectively —BETTER PLANNING. The Lochner team recognizes that Miami Beach faces interlinked"urban"challenges, such as: • Lack of affordable housing • Insufficient or affordable public transportation • Insufficient and unequal physical and social infrastructure • Degradation of urban environment • Spatially segregated land uses leading to long trips and/or long time spent traveling • High greenhouse gas emission and climate change There are several strategies that can be implemented for more success integrating transportation and land use: • Infrastructure-efficient land use planning. Land use planning should focus new housing development in areas with established or planned transit service and other infrastructure like streets and community facilities, and areas where such infrastructure can be expanded cost-effectively. Baylink has 10 stations planned on Miami Beach on Washington and Meridian Avenues, and 7th, 10th, and 14th Streets, Lincoln Road, and the Miami Beach Convention Center,these areas are ripe for land use changes to increase density and encourage the use of transit. Infrastructure is expensive and existing infrastructure needs are chronically underfunded, so it makes sense to minimize the infrastructure costs of new development near these stations, keeping in mind that dense development should generally avoid environmental hazard zones.The Lochner Team explores land-use scenarios that use existing infrastructure more effectively and minimize the infrastructure demands of planned development. • Improve planning of large developments. Planning of large developments on the Beach should not be arbitrary and inconsistent, and consistent rules should be applied.The Lochner Team ensures consolidated provisions are in place for reviewing and approving large projects,to secure public benefits from large new developments(affordable housing, repairing the street grid, quality open spaces, and strong urban design), and create greater certainty for both developers. residents, and visitors. • Rationalize the Planning Code.The Lochner team works with Miami Beach staff to improve the Code's organization,and eliminate redundant and outdated provisions,with the ultimate goal to transform the Code into a tool for creating livable and sustainable buildings and neighborhoods. • Strengthen green building requirements.Stronger green building requirements can reduce environmental and infrastructure demands of new projects. • Development impact fees to fund housing and infrastructure.The Lochner Team examines and/or explores new and creative ways to recover development impact fees.The system should be designed to fund walking,cycling,and regional transit infrastructure at the Beach and should accurately reflect the impact a project's transportation choices, including parking,trip generation,transit system,and other infrastructure. Parking structures should be of particular interest, as they increase danger and inconvenience on pedestrians,cyclists,and transit riders. Transportation policies to improve public transportation alone do not prevent private vehicle travel and do not attract development around transit stations. In addition, land use policies for density or mixed uses are not enough. Integrated land use and transportation policies are more successful than isolated individual polices in either field. 2017-126-KB 1 32 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R • ,- irinfr hr]Dro•f Dublk M.iU ardN gy.]Gm Cnmplct�Suuot. Drmmne-.,.•.ir“,,3„ Int TrrnDon4”" brb,„r-.,.,,:.:r..- r.•,-.ti--r Integrated Transportation and Land Use Land use transportation integration creates: • Easy access to work, housing and recreation • Reduced expenditures for residents and visitors for transportation • More time • Safer neighborhoods • Better opportunities for physical activity • Healthier environment Gridics, using their Zonar application supports the Lochner Team.Zonar is the world's first site-specific zoning software application. It integrates any zoning code and converts hours, days, and even weeks of work into minutes. For this contract,Zonar will be able to test proposed zoning scenarios and the impacts of development and growth on the Beach near the proposed Baylink stations, and visualize it in 3-D with a few clicks;or anywhere else.Zonar can recreate any rule,variance, bonus or local requirement. It is fully customizable and works with every current and future use or regulation.Zonar was recently adopted by the City of Miami and bringing it to the Beach will provide a seamless land use system. Karen Kiselewski,AICP, Senior Associate, of Cambridge Systematics has extensive land use, multimodal and transportation policy experience throughout the South Florida region, including performance measurement, comprehensive plan and development regulation reviews and audits for state and local agencies. Ms. Kiselewski convened the Southeast Florida TOD Working Group which is working to advance TOD in the region.She has developed inventories of local, regional and national resources and research on TOD planning,funding and implementation and joint development practices throughout the country. She also provided technical support, following MAP-21 guidance,for a Transit Asset Management Plan for Los Angeles Metro. Kevin Tilbury,AICP, Senior Associate, of Cambridge Systematics has nearly 20 years of integrated multimodal transportation and land use planning for government agency partners at the local, regional and state levels in Florida,the southeast and nationally. He excels and communicating complex data and analysis to non-technical stakeholder audiences. His work in Florida takes an integrated approach to mobility, including private vehicles, transit,walking and cycling. His interest and passion lies in understanding how the realms of land use and transportation can complement each other to create livable and functional places. 2017-126-KB J 33 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R Ekaterina Yagodina,Zoning Analyst/Project Manager,of Gridics is an international expert in land development, urban planning and regional planning. During her time with the Center of Environmental and Urban Studies at FAU, she participated in civic engagement and neighborhood revitalization project: Issues and Options for Little Havana. She also performed research and analysis to support case studies for Lauderdale by the Sea. During her time with EDSA,Yagodina provided design guidelines and a transportation study for an Artificial Island in China. She holds a Master's degree in Urban and Regional Planning from FAU, a Master's in Land Development,as well as Bachelor's in Economy and Accounting. Luciana Uns, Director of Product/Project Manager, of Gridics is an architect and urban planner with Master's degrees in both Architecture and Engineering. Prior to joining Gridics, Luciana worked with Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects in New Haven, CT where she developed master plans, airports and university campus buildings. In 2009 Luciana co-founded an architecture firm based in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her firm was responsible for the design of several production facilities for airplane manufacturer Embraer, as well as many bespoke residences. In 2013 Luciana was asked to join IPPLAN, a nonprofit urban planning institute,where she was responsible for developing master, comprehensive, and transportation plans throughout Brazil. Luciana is also a professor and has taught architecture related courses at several universities.At Gridics, Luciana is contributing her experience to help develop Zonar-the future of smart urban development. 6. Economic and Financial Analysis Tom Lavash,WTL+a, leads all economic and financial analysis for this contract.WTL+a, a small business created in 2009, brings 32 years of experience in real estate and economic development consulting on behalf of public and private clients, including municipal and state governments, institutions, investment funds, and real estate developers. The firm's practice is focused in the following areas: market and financial feasibility studies for all land uses; development programming for mixed-use projects; neighborhood-and corridor-commercial district revitalization strategies;and implementation/funding strategies, particularly the use of tax increment financing (TIF). For municipalities and institutions,WTL+a serves as a key advisor on multi-disciplined teams focusing on neighborhood and commercial revitalization, business recruitment and retention,economic impacts, land use and regulatory policies, implementation strategies, and cost/benefit studies.The firm's transportation experience includes:economic development strategies for corridor transit plans; economic impacts of transit alternatives; and TOD,with projects in eight states focused on real estate market potentials,economic viability, station area planning, and funding strategies for development surrounding rail stations. The firm's practice is focused in three core areas: • Real Estate Markets&Land Economics - Market/Development Potentials - Master Planning&Land Use Programming - Development Advisory Services • Real Estate Financial Feasibility&Funding Mechanisms - Pro Forma/Investment Analysis - Economic&Fiscal Impacts - Tax Increment Financing (TIF)Analysis 2017-126-KB 134 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER • Implementation Strategies - Economic Development Strategies - Developer RFOs/RFPs - Developer Ranking&Selection Services Areas of Expertise/Experience: • Economic impacts&financial feasibility of real estate development/redevelopment projects • Market analysis of transit-related development/TOD/joint development • Development strategies for intermodal&multi-modal transportation centers • Impact of transit networks on commercial centers/downtown areas • Collateral development opportunities in transit corridors • Development funding&incentives for redevelopment areas • Economic&fiscal impacts of transportation projects • Analysis of corridor revitalization strategies using transit improvements • Value capture strategies for transportation improvements • Transportation mobility hub master plans Recent projects include: • Multiple Studies—Miami Intermodal Center Joint Development, Miami • FEC Rail Corridor TOD Station Area Planning(Coastal Link), Miami-Dade/Broward/Palm Beach Counties • FEC Rail Corridor Economic Impact&Value Capture(Coastal Link), Miami-Dade/Broward/Palm Beach Counties • 125th Street ULI TAP Panel, North Miami • 79th Street Retail Corridor Strategy, Miami • S. Florida Avenue Corridor Revitalization Strategy, Lakeland • FDOT District 5 Community Planning Workshop • North Federal'Highway Market Study • West Palm Beach Transit Village Study • 40-Mile Intracoastal Waterway Study • Route 7/441 Corridor Study • Jupiter TOD Station Analysis • Highway 98 Corridor CRA Studies • North US 19 Corridor Revitalization Strategy • State Route 60/Brandon Area Redevelopment Strategy • Hillsborough County TOD Studies • Central Beach/A1A Master Plan • Causeway Boulevard Corridor Revitalization Strategy • Cleveland Avenue/Route 41 CRA Master Plan • Palm Avenue CRA&TIF Studies • Martin&St. Lucie Counties Regional Waterways Plan Cambridge Systematics(CS)provides nationally-and internationally-recognized consulting services in the areas of infrastructure finance, impact fee programming,tolling and revenue forecasting,capital budgeting and programming, benefit/cost and financial analysis for public facilities,financial modeling,and economic analysis for public and private sector program management.We have been at the forefront of transportation finance and needs analysis studies for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administrations(FTA),American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO), Transportation Research Board(TRB), state DOTs,The Hudson Institute, and National Chamber Foundation.A central component of this work is the consideration of revenue measures and innovative finance opportunities that can leverage available Federal, state, local, and private funds and increase the financial feasibility of proposed investments. 2017-126-KB 135 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications LOCHNER CITY OF MIAMI BEACH meet the nation's highway CS described future financing needs and options to 9 Y and transit investment needs through 2017 for the TRB-sponsored National Cooperative Highway Research Program(NCHRP)Project 20-24(49). For the National Chamber Foundation of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,we examined the Federal role in funding highway and transit capital improvements and stimulating greater state and local investment.We also provided an assessment of alternative sources of short-and long-term transportation revenue as part of the Hudson Institute's 2010 and Beyond:A Vision of America's Transportation Future. For AASHTO, CS led the team that prepared the needs analysis for the most recent AASHTO Highway and Transit Bottom Line Report, including both highway and transit investment requirements.We also are completing a series of Freight Transportation Bottom Line Reports for AASHTO.These reports contain policy and legislative recommendations to guide Congress in determining national highway and transit investment requirements. In addition, CS is supporting the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission in assessing highway and transit needs, freight system requirements, revenue and innovative finance options, and public-private partnership(P3)opportunities. CS constantly monitors new financing techniques and approaches for engaging the private sector to help solve policy and investment problems.We have been providing support for the FHWA's Innovative Finance initiative for many years.They recently reviewed federally sponsored innovative finance programs and tools advanced by the U.S. DOT since 1996 and prepared an innovative finance brochure and primer,which has played an important role in building awareness and educating state and local officials in new, nontraditional financing mechanisms and the benefits of implementing such techniques. CS also prepares the FHWA's Innovative Finance Quarterly newsletter that disseminates information on innovative finance programs, best practices, research, and training opportunities to state and local transportation officials. In addition, CS staff provide technical support to the FHWA's Office of Federal Aid Financial Management and the Department's TIFIA Joint Program Office.We are completing work on a synthesis report that examines the information provided to decision-makers involved in PPP deals and how that information was used in the decision-making process.This research investigates opinions related to the reliability of that information and how the public interest was protected.The synthesis lays out the main criteria for selecting PPP as the project delivery method from the public perspective,which will help future decision makers pay attention to the most critical aspects of these proposals. W.Thomas(Tom) Lavash, Managing Principal, and a former principal/partner with ERA(acquired by AECOM), brings 32 years of experience in real estate and economic development consulting on behalf of public and private clients, including municipal, county and state governments, institutions, investment funds and real estate developers and he has worked on more than 450 projects across the United States. He directs market,financial feasibility,and economic studies for all types of real estate,with an emphasis on mixed-use, downtown and waterfront,commercial districts and in-town neighborhoods,and new urbanist in-fill and transit-oriented development(TOD)projects. His practice is focused in the following areas: market and financial feasibility studies for all land uses;development programming for mixed-use projects; neighborhood-and corridor-commercial district revitalization strategies; and implementation/funding strategies, particularly the use of tax increment financing(TIF). Tom Moriarity, of WTL+a has a background in urban mixed-use development,transit-oriented development, commercial area management, retail programming in specialized environments,downtown revitalization strategies, and historic preservation projects. As Managing Principal of RDS, he brings over 30 years of experience in real estate consulting with Halcyon Ltd, Ernst&Young, Economics Research Associates(where he was an ERA Principal and Vice-President for 17 years)and AECOM. For RDS, he directs development strategy studies for transit-related projects, urban mixed-use programming, collateral development planning for universities, hospitals, and other specialized sites, collateral development analysis for transit-oriented development, retail and concessions analysis for airports and intermodal transportation centers, revitalization of historic downtown and commercial districts, urban entertainment districts,development analysis for new towns,commercial corridors/districts. Roberto Alvarado-Vazquez, LEED AP, Senior Associate, of Cambridge Systematics brings 9 years of experience in transportation planning and finance. He leverages his engineering training, cross-functional collaboration skills, and financial skills to help transportation agencies make informed strategic investment decisions. Collectively, he has provided financial analyses, performance evaluation services, and traffic and revenue(T&R)studies to over 2017-126-KB 36 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications LOCHNER CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Istate, and Federal level. Highlights 25 different organizations at the local, of his experience include development of econometric models and conducting quantitative assessments to help clients identify, evaluate, and forecast revenue streams to support transportation investments; designing robust excel-based models to determine future financial position, assess project risks, and evaluate overall financial capacity to deliver and operate transportation systems; and conducting level 1 traffic and revenue(T&R)revenue forecast and designing analytical models that evaluate the short-term traffic and revenue implications. 7. Transit Planning Andrea Ostrodka,AICP, LEED AP, Lochner, leads Transit Planning. .4,XI Lochner has the necessary experience and expertise to work with the City of Miami Beach to improve the timeliness, reliability, safety,and accessibility of public transit,which includes buses, rail,streetcar and bicycles.We are advocates for investments in ter, transit capacity to relieve overcrowding and will identify strategies to ,*--. - r^k A grow transit ridership. Our experience spans from transit planning '"""""'"'^°"`" initiatives related to rail(commuter, light, and freight), bus rapid 'Q _/ transit, intercity bus service, and regional intermodal systems, as �=` I Mlb well as for trails and other pedestrian/non-motorized facilities. - 1�1 ii1 Miami-Dade MPO's SMART Plan for transit has emerged as a key `"""*= element of public transportation development for the Miami area over the next decade and beyond.The successful implementation graphic by EMBARQ India of this plan requires a close partnership between the City, D6 and the Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works as well as the Transportation Planning Organization.This team leverages prior transit system plan experience to ensure that the SMART corridors progress on an aggressive schedule, leveraging available Federal and State transit funding resources, and remaining focused on providing the appropriate mode,technology and quality of transit service at the right time in the future growth of the Miami area, and at the right locations within the region. Market segmentation provides insight into the locations,demographic, and employment characteristics and commuting patterns of existing and emerging target groups in the City's service area.As required,we conduct a market assessment effort using a variety of available data, including the American Community Survey(ACS)2015 population and demographic data, employment, school,and commercial data. In addition,the City of Miami Beach is advancing an agenda for FY 17 that includes a multimodal approach to mobility and land use for the City and neighborhoods within the City.These plans include complete streets, bicycle safety,expanded transit investments, Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)for major causeways and roadways, as well as expanded water taxi service. Developing these plans and identifying future funding sources at the State and Federal level will be critical to the implementation of these plans. Further,coordination with the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO)as the TPO and Miami-Dade Transit seek to implement the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit(SMART)Plan and as Federal planning requirements expand the criteria used to evaluate transportation investments and provide an opportunity to develop scenarios that guide growth and transportation investments in the region. The Lochner Team recognizes that transit agencies can live and die by the experience of their consumers. When their riders know about their transit options,and about the real time arrival of their transportation,they more easily can plan their trips. As a result, ridership, mode use and satisfaction can rise and complaints can fall. Boothe Transit Consulting (BTC), LLC is led by President Jeff Boothe who has spent nearly forty years in the public transit industry. He combines deep knowledge of the public transit industry;decades shaping federal laws, regulations and guidance that govern public transit; counseling clients on federal compliance issues; substantial understanding of the federal government as a Congressional staffer advising former United States Senate 2017-126-KB 137 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R Appropriations Committee Chairman Mark O. Hatfield to advance the first light rail project in Portland, Oregon through the appropriations and federal approval process,as the leader of two major transit industry coalitions, and in the representation of many clients before the Department of Transportation, and the Federal Transit Administration and, a proven record of providing strategic guidance to clients seeking to secure federal funding and finance for capital projects through the Capital Investment Grants("CIG")program.Jeff has substantial experience in representing public transit authorities to secure FTA bus and rail project approvals. Services offered by BTC include: • Strategic advisory services to transit agencies, cities and project sponsors seeking to advance transit capital investments, including project prioritization, identifying funding options,and, project finance • Advise on complying with federal laws, regulations and guidance impacting project approvals, project finance, procurement, and Buy America • Technical assistance regarding the securing funding under the CIG program, including Core Capacity, New Starts and Small Starts Andrea Ostrodka,AICP, Senior Project Manager, of Lochner brings over 13 years of diverse public and private- sector experience in transit systems planning, urban planning, and project and team management with a focus in transportation,sustainable design, strategic planning, policy,code-writing, and public relations with a particular expertise in applying these skills to the design and creation of strategic plans and regional plans. She also has a broad base of experience in environmental and community systems. Recently, prior to joining Lochner,Andrea served as Director of Planning&Development for the Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority(LYNX), where she directed day-to-day operations of strategic planning,engineering, construction, routes and schedules, intelligent transportation systems(ITS), and grants; established and monitored performance metrics and best practices for transit operations; and assessed operational and financial impacts. Lara Bouck, PE,AICP, Senior Planner, of Lochner has more than 10 years' experience in transportation and transit planning. She has been a key player in a number of large-scale projects and completed a diverse range of planning activities for private, municipal, regional, and state-level clients. Her expertise encompasses feasibility and corridor studies, project development and environment(PD&E)studies,capital cost development, social and cultural impact analyses, public involvement techniques,and the preparation of FTA and NEPA documentation. She has had notable involvement in transit planning initiatives related to rail(commuter, light, and freight), bus rapid transit, intercity bus service, and regional intermodal systems, as well as for trails and other pedestrian/non-motorized facilities. She has also worked on numerous transportation-and traffic-focused planning projects, ranging from city center master plans to PD&E studies for interstate improvements. Susan Neiswender Black,JD MPA, Senior Program Manager, of Lochner has over 25 years of diverse public and private-sector experience in organizational development and planning, performance management, risk management, program management and team management with a focus in process and system design, policy development, and strategic planning and implementation. Recently, prior to joining Lochner, Susan served as General Manager/Interim CEO of the Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority(LYNX),where she effectively managed the LYNX public transit system:$120 million annual operating budget,3 facilities locations, 300 vehicles and 75 routes serving over 100,000 riders daily across 2,500 sq. mi.,with over 4,500 bus stops/shelters within the tri-county service area. Jeffrey F. Boothe. President of Boothe Transit Consulting LLC(BTC)is a leader in the public transit industry, he has created a niche in surface transportation policy,developing a proven track record of successfully advancing public transit projects through the Federal project approval process.Jeff combines nearly 40 years of legislative experience, leading major transit advocacy coalitions in Washington, DC, and advocating for capital projects currently in revenue service that successfully completed the Federal Transit Administration("FTA")approval process. Prior to establishing BTC, he spent fifteen years working at Holland&Knight where his leadership in transportation was recognized in US News and World Report in 2015.Jeff is the only chair of the New Starts Working Group ("Working Group")since it was formed in 1995. Members include transit properties, cities and private sector companies that actively support expansion of federal funding for the construction of transit capital projects. He also 2017-126-KB 138 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER serves as Executive Director of the Community Streetcar Coalition("CSC").The CSC is an organization of cities, transit authorities and architectural and engineering firms established to affect federal legislative and regulatory issues that impact the funding and advancement of streetcar projects nationwide. In 2015,Jeff completed a three year term on the Board of Directors for the American Public Transportation Association ("APTA"). He also served on the APTA Business Member Board of Governors from 2005-2015. He is a board member for the Center for Transportation Excellence,which was established to assist local areas to respond to transit critics and conduct successful elections for transit ballot initiatives. 8. Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Matthew Ridgway,AICP, PTP of Fehr&Peers leads Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning. Fehr&Peers recognizes that planning and design for bicycling and walking evolves continually and their staff's investment in research,as well as our presence in leadership roles of national organizations has kept them in front of this field.Their staff along with Lochner staff are heavily invested in bicycling and walking-some live car-free and others are competitive cyclists, but we pride ourselves on being objective and fact-based.The Lochner Team philosophy is to balance the needs of all modes while offering expert knowledge of best practices. The Lochner Team offers a full range of bicycle and pedestrian planning services, including: PEDESTRIANS ■ Bicycle Pedestrian&Trail Master Planning BICYCLES • Pedestrian&Bicycle Design Innovations P u B . I C TRANSIT • Bike Share Planning&Design v E ; • Wayfinding Planning&Design ■ Health Impact Analysis • Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety, Including Vision Zero • Complete Streets Planning and Design • nki • Safe Routes to Schools • Bikeway Design, Plans, Specifications&Estimates oak ■ Safe Routes to Transit • Bicycle&Pedestrian Forecasting&GIS Analysis The Lochner Team understands that pedestrian and bicycling improvements directly substitute for automobile trips and support public transit and ridesharing. Residents of communities with good walking and bicycling conditions drive less and use transit more. One of Lochner's main goals on this contract is to transform Miami Beach streets into a pedestrian-oriented network of landscaped bicycle boulevards and green neighborhood streets,which will link the city's neighborhoods to one another and to the major parks,wildlife corridors, ocean/waterfront, and public transit hubs.This network will serve as sustainable transportation infrastructure(walking, bicycling, and public transit), and provide storm water infiltration and management, natural habitat, recreation,and neighborhood economic development-making Miami Beach the most bicycle friendly in the nation. The Lochner Team knows that planning so that pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists can travel safely and conveniently can be a balancing act, but the benefits reaped by well-balanced transportation and land use planning are significant. Communities that are bicycle-and pedestrian-friendly have one thing in common:they place a high priority on planning methods and policies that favor alternative modes of travel.The City of Miami Beaches Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan has a strong vision of low stress, safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian streets • that will encourage bicycling and walking,enhance the environment and improve public health and quality of life, 2017-126-KB 139 Tab 2 I Experience &Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER along with over 40 Miles of new and improved bikeways. Our team is well-positioned to help the City shift towards a balanced transportation network that elevates human based modes—bicycling,walking and taking transit—as viable forms of transportation for a majority of city residents. The Lochner Team doesn't just have experience planning conceptual bike lane, protected bike lane or greenway projects;our design team has implemented them all across the nation. We have repurposed underutilized travel lanes to create bike lanes and also converted existing bike lanes into protected bike lanes,which provides added safety for cyclist through the use planters,curbs, parked cars or posts to separate bike and auto traffic on busy streets.These types of improvements are essential to building a full network of bike-friendly routes and can be incorporated into the City of Miami Beach's Complete Streets plans and policies or into traffic calming measures. Through our extensive experience,we have learned that bicyclist can be protected in a number of different ways: • Stripped Buffers • Delineator Post • Bumps(Turtle, Large or Oblong) • Parking Stops • Parked Cars • Linear Barriers(Short or Jersey) • Planters • • Rigid Bollards • Cast in-place Curb or Pre-cast Curb • Raised or Elevated Bikeways Depending on the conditions and budget,the Lochner Team will find a solution that fits! Walking is the oldest, most efficient,affordable, and environmentally-friendly form of transportation.Walking is how transit riders eventually reach their destinations, how drivers get from the parking lot to the front door,and how cyclists get from the bike rack to the business.And walking is about more than transportation.Walking helps to build strong communities and is the primary way that neighbors get to know one another.Walking is also great exercise and an easy way to improve your mental and physical health. Nearly everyone,for at least some portion of every day, is a pedestrian. The City of Miami Beach's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is a long-term action plan with pedestrian"priority zones"(PPZs),which include recommendations to enhance the pedestrian experience and also safety,such as: • Clear pedestrian path of 6 feet minimum • Sidewalks on both sides of the street everywhere vehicle travel is present • Curbs are aligned with ramps and sidewalks • All intersections with visible crosswalks, 10-foot min • Crossing signals give enough time for crossing safely • Travel lanes have a reduced width of 10 feet • Provide curb extensions(bulb outs)at intersections • Require crossings at regular intervals, not to exceed 800 feet • Require Street trees/Shade trees/Shade structures on all sidewalks • Prohibit right turns on red. Provide green signal turn • Reduce posted speed limit to 25 mph • Reduce design speed by implementing traffic calming methods and pedestrian oriented countermeasures listed in the Street Design Guidelines 2017-126-KB 140 Tab 2 I Experience &Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER The policies, programs, design criteria, and projects outlined in the plan will further enhance pedestrian safety, comfort, and access in Miami Beach, making transportation system more environmentally, economically,and socially sustainable.The Lochner Team has experience working with municipalities and within these types of policies will develop cost-feasible constructible solutions to make Miami Beach a more walkable, livable, and healthy city. Charlie Alexander, PE, AICP, Senior Associate,of Fehr&Peers is a national Complete Streets expert who specializes in complex multimodal transportation planning and engineering projects. In addition to Active Transportation projects, his project experience includes traffic operations, safety,transit planning,travel demand forecasting and traffic engineering design projects. Charlie applies this diverse experience to projects that require complex bicycle, pedestrian and transit design solutions; consent-building around modal tradeoffs; and strategic stakeholder and community engagement. He is a leader of Fehr&Peers' companywide Bicycle&Pedestrian Discipline Group and teaches courses on Complete Streets to master's students and other practitioners through the University of Colorado, Denver,the National Complete Streets Coalition and the University of California, Berkeley. In addition to his Complete Streets work, Charlie has completed numerous campus planning and design projects for universities throughout Colorado and California including serving as the on-call traffic engineer for the University of California, Davis where he regularly developed solutions to resolve transportation-related issues for the 35,000-student campus. He recently completed the East Arapahoe Transportation Plan in Boulder, CO,a four- mile corridor,where he developed a corridor plan including one-way protected bike lanes, multi-use paths and intersection treatments to improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety. He also led the alternatives analysis which was ranked according to level of comfort for bicyclist and pedestrians and produced forecasts of likely levels of walking and biking with implementation of the plan. He also prepared design plans for protected bike lanes on Stout Street, for the Stout Street, Champa Street&29th Avenue Bike Lane Designs Project, in Lakewood, CO, including buffered bike lanes on Champa Street and a combination of protected, buffered and standard bike lanes on 29th Avenue. Dana Weissman, Senior Transportation Planner, of Fehr&Peers brings wide range of experience on multimodal projects, including Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning, Safety, and Research; Park Access and Circulation;Transit Planning; and Transportation Impact Assessment. Dana's particular focus is on multimodal safety and project prioritization. Dana led the high-profile Vision Zero project prioritization effort for the City of Los Angeles,as well as two pedestrian prioritization efforts with the City of San Francisco for their WalkFirst and Streetscape Prioritization projects. Dana has presented on Vision Zero and other innovative safety strategies at conferences across the United States. Her WalkFirst and Streetscape Prioritization projects won ITE and APA best project awards,and her Vision Zero paper was honored with Pedestrian Committee Best Paper Award at TRB in 2015. Recent projects include the San Francisco WalkFirst Pedestrian Safety CIP where created a prioritized pedestrian capital improvement project list to meet benchmarks outlined in the City's Pedestrian Strategy.The technical analysis used citywide pedestrian collision and injury data to understand the current nature of pedestrian crashes, profile different pedestrian crash types, determine the most effective countermeasures, and prioritize a strategy to treat the areas of greatest need for pedestrian infrastructure improvement. James E.Spinks III, PE, PTOE, Senior Transportation Engineer, of Lochner brings more than 18 years of experience.James has applied for 25 mph speed limit designations for multiple Miami-Dade cites,developed citywide traffic calming master plans for multiple municipalities with the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works(DTPW)that contained traffic circles, speed tables, and complete street concepts that included lane repurposing,wide sidewalks, mid-block crosswalks, landscaping, bike lanes, bulb-outs,high-emphasis intersection crosswalks,and operational and safety improvements at intersections. In addition to municipal projects, James also recently served as the Project Manager to the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization(TPO), where he managed the Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan,the 2015 and 2016 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Plans, and the Bike Friendly Miami-Dade Plan. Prior to joining Lochner,James recently managed a Traffic Operations and Safety Contract for FDOT Districts Six,where he completed the SW 107th Avenue,south of SW 88th Street Pedestrian Study that developed recommendations to mitigate one of highest pedestrian crash locations in Miami- Dade County, including a warranted mid-block pedestrian crossing. In addition,James also developed enhanced bicycle and pedestrian improvement recommendations on SR A1A in Sunny Isles Beach,where a high rate of cyclist and pedestrian crashes occur, including separated bike lanes. 2017-126-KB 1 41 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Matt Wey, PE, PTOE, Senior Transportation Engineer,of Lochner has 18 years of experience with providing comprehensive traffic engineering, multi-modal transportation planning and Project Development and Environment (PD&E)services throughout the State of Florida. His responsibilities serving as project manager and lead engineer on various multi-modal transportation planning projects/NEPA studies have included developing access management plans,conducting traffic impact and transportation corridor studies, developing design traffic memoranda,writing preliminary engineering reports and engaging in public involvement activities,documenting environmental determinations, performing conceptual roadway design,transportation cost estimating, reviewing enhancement project phase submittals and conducting technical analyses in support of Interchange Modification Reports(IMRs)and Interchange Operational Analysis Reports(IOARs). He recently completed task on the 15th St East/301 Blvd East PD&E Study from Tallevast Rd to US 41 in Bradenton, FL,where developed Complete streets- related recommendations, such as bicycle lanes,sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, street lighting, and roundabouts, as well as transit improvements. 9. Urban Design Alfredo C. Sanchez,AIA,AICP, LEED AP,of B&A leads Urban Design, supported by PlusUrbia. B&A's Urban ;'V It. - Design and Landscape Architecture team have extensive -.. 14 �,, g < A experience working across a broad spectrum of project ;a'�` A ... A . ,: R ItTj_~.e, +,� ; A. types in various contexts and locales. Collaborating with "— `'' i ' communities, stakeholders, and agencies to design hi h- j �...� _ z 9 9 g T• ' ""� ``R '1,'` quality urban environments that respond to the local needs - �' \'\ ,i P >• -.:::-:17:;,' , - and surrounding areas is a priority for our clients and thus •,_, _. \ emphasized through design to create great places. ::.i...-------- _ B&A's familiarity with current planning issues in South Florida and best practices of urban design is indicated by a work portfolio that ranges from major expressway Master Plans to specific area plans. Sea Level Rise is a major concern in South Florida, and we are cognizant of the City of Miami Beach regulations and efforts to respond to this challenge and understand that this is an integral part of planning in South Florida today. B&A's portfolio of work includes major parks,of various scale, including a multitude of uses, incorporating beach walks, pedestrian ways and shared use paths. Most recently, B&A has completed the Truman Presidential Park, a major urban space in the City of Key West, Florida.This park links park activities to the downtown and develops a unique waterfront destination on a former naval base. Additionally, B&A has prepared the City of Pompano Beach City-Wide Parks Master Plan that included a Bicycle Mobility Plan to establish the location of bicycle circulation improvements within the city's streets and dedicated pedestrian/bicycle areas to link city park facilities via bicycle.The process included an analysis of existing city bicycle system, identification of bike boulevard routes based on desired origin and destination. It also included route planning; signs and pavement marking, speed management to bring the speed of cars closer to that of bicycles, and volume management to reduce the amount of traffic on local streets designated as bike boulevards,as well as managing street crossings with right of way priorities for bikes and visibility measures. With vast experience in the design of transit facilities and station area plans, B&A has developed plans for the Baylink Project,the North Corridor Extension of Metrorail and the SR7 Bus Rapid Transit Project. Currently, B&A is actively engaged in the planning of the SMART Plan's Beach Connector Project. PlusUrbia Design is an award-winning, Miami-based studio with expertise in land-use planning, urban design, public engagement,visualization,transit-oriented development,zoning code creation,financial mechanisms and corridor master planning.Their studio applies context-sensitive solutions to a full range of public and private sector projects in North, South and Central America as well as China and the Middle East. 2017-126-KB 1 42 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R The firm's Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization District earned national, statewide and regional awards from the American Planning Association. PlusUrbia's Wynwood Walls Garden won the Urban Land Institute's Southeast Florida/Caribbean Chapter Vision Award. It won China's prestigious KINPAN award for Songhua Lake Resort. PlusUrbia Design's skill set closely matches the scope of services in the City of Miami Beach General Transportation Planning Services RFQ.The most relevant project is Land-Use Planning for two Transit Oriented Development districts in the City of Hialeah. In the span of only seven months, PlusUrbia met with city officials, held workshops for stakeholders, created visualizations,worked with staff to write legislation and briefed elected officials through the unanimous adoption of the first TOD in the County in more than a decade. The Market District and Transfer rail stations TODs total 313 acres of compact, mixed-use development around rail connectivity.Affordable housing will cut household costs dramatically by being within walking distance of rail transit that connects to all of Miami-Dade County's major job centers. Alfredo C. Sanchez,AIA,AICP, LEED AP, Urban Designer, of B&A brings 40+years of architecture and urban planning and design experience on over 100 major planning studies and urban design plans in Miami. He specializes in city wide master plans, corridor plans, major reconstruction efforts, pedestrian improvements, urban, retail and mixed-use Development projects,land planning projects including redevelopment and design of new communities. Recent projects include the Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan, Palmetto Bay, FL;Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Urban Village Regulations(Form Based Code), FL; Port Tampa Bay Channelside Master Plan, Tampa, FL; Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; Pompano Beach Waterfront Master Plan, Pompano Beach, FL; Baylink Light Rail Urban&Station Design, Miami Beach, FL; and North Corridor Alternative Analysis&Station Area Design. Miami-Dade&Broward Counties, FL. Joshua Rak, Urban Design/Form Based Code, of B&A brings 10 years of Urban&Planning experience with extensive experience in the creation urban design details and zoning ordinances. He is experienced in formulation and implementation of the regulatory needs. Recent projects include the 2040 Strategic Master Plan, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, FL;TIGER Grant-Tampa Channelside,Tampa, FL; Marassi Marina Update;Village of Miami Shores Community Center Feasibility Study;West Dade Finding of Necessity; La Chorrera Development Plan, Panama and the Tapia Property in Panama. Juan Mullerat,Assoc.AIA,APA, NCI, CNU, Founder,of PlusUrbia was awarded the Urban Designer of the Year by the Miami Chapter of the American Institute of Architects. In the past four years, PlusUrbia has been honored with 10 international, national and local awards for its urban design. Much of its acclaimed urban design has been done in conjunction with transportation planning. Most recently,the studio served as Urban Designer on Design-Build team for$800 million signature 395 bridge submission—innovative design to reconnect the city's fabric through vibrant urban space that will bring cohesion to historic Overtown. Community input drove contextual design of water features, recreation space, an urban forest, a community garden, and a dramatic pedestrian bridge on newly- available land under 395. Megan McLaughlin,AICP,is a certified planner and urban designer who has extensive public and private sector experience in urban planning and historic preservation for cities in South Florida and nationwide. McLaughlin has vast experience in land use planning to support economic development along transit corridors, and has authored a variety of land use regulations to support walkable, transit-supportive development, including form-based codes, comprehensive plans,traditional zoning regulations, and masterplan reports.An integral part of her planning practice is fostering public involvement in order to shape master plans and land use policies that have strong community support. Prior to joining PlusUrbia, McLaughlin worked in the Planning Departments of the City of Miami and the City of Coral Gables,where her responsibilities included drafting land use policy, organizing community workshops, project review and adoption, and day-to-day administration of zoning and comprehensive plan regulations. In addition, she has experience working on masterplans,form-based codes, and comprehensive plans in cities throughout the country. 2017-126-KB 143 Tab 2 I Experience &Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER 10. Station Area Planning and Transit Oriented Development • • •moi ,s 1'_ _ � U f wr I • t: � `' gar • 4, I, .,� 4, Alfredo C. Sanchez,AIA,AICP, LEED AP, of B&A leads Station Area Planning&Transit Oriented Development, supported by Cambridge Systematics.B&A,the Team's urban design, landscape architecture and Planning subconsultant has extensive experience in developing and implementing guidelines and regulations such as Form Based Codes,which emphasize pedestrian-scale development via both transit and non-motorized means of accessibility and use. Most recently, B&A prepared the Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan and further worked with the Village of Palmetto Bay to develop and implement a Form Based Code(FBC)for the creation of its Downtown, as a mixed- use, pedestrian-friendly,and Transit-Oriented Development(TOD).The FBC proposed ground level retail uses on the major future commercial street, Franjo Road,work-live space on secondary streets, on-street parking;and a bonus based increase in residential development density to incentivize residential construction.The Form Based Code has had tremendous interest from the developer community with numerous projects implemented as a response to the new development standards. Creating Complete Streets, improving pedestrian mobility and incorporating land uses consistent with higher intensity, and density within the !'2 mile pedestrian shed, are economically viable and essential elements of creating a successful Transit Oriented Development. Miami Beach,a unique place, is an ideal urban development with varying scales and proximity relationships with walkable streets and districts.We understand the urban form of the City of Miami Beach, the intricacies of each community and individual sector. Our approach to the development of a TOD in Miami Beach would be first to address existing conditions in and around the study area,identify both existing and forthcoming activity generators, pinpoint opportunities for new redevelopment and analyze traffic circulation issues/impediments to pedestrian mobility to understand the space and define an intervention strategy. We incorporate market analyses work carried out for the area,and summarize the issues and opportunities that must be addressed to create a successful TOD Master Plan,an Area Plan.Where multiple options are viable, evaluation criteria are formulated to assess each option and select a Preferred Master Plan.The Master Plan is the guiding element for the development of regulatory guidelines/standards that support the TOD.While these regulatory mechanisms can occur in various forms under the present zoning of the City of Miami Beach,public participation and stakeholder input is the driving force behind implementation of the master plan. 2017-126-KB 144 Tab 2 I Experience &Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R Lochner Team member Cambridge Systematics have a long history of successful transit oriented development (TOD)efforts in South Florida,as well as throughout the country.They are currently supporting VIA Metropolitan Transit in San Antonio develop both guidelines for TOD and station area developments, as well as developing a specific site, Randolph Station, based on the 2040 Vision Plan they developed in 2016.They are also engaged with VIA in locating stations along four major Premium Transit corridors which are the subject of four concurrent Alternatives Analysis studies.Team members Kevin Tilbury and Peter Haliburton recently collaborated in developing station area concepts for a passenger rail project in Chatanooga,TN, and Kevin brings decades of experience with transit oriented land use planning throughout Florida. Alfredo C. Sanchez,AIA,AICP, LEED AP, Urban Designer, of B&A brings over 40 years of architecture and urban planning and design experience on over 100 major planning studies and urban design plans in Miami. He specializes in city wide master plans,corridor plans, major reconstruction efforts,pedestrian improvements, urban, retail and mixed-use Development projects, land planning projects including redevelopment and design of new communities. Recent projects include the Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan, Palmetto Bay, FL: Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Urban Village Regulations(Form Based Code), FL; Port Tampa Bay Channelside Master Plan, Tampa, FL; Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan, Ft. Lauderdale, FL; Pompano Beach Waterfront Master Plan, Pompano Beach, FL; Baylink Light Rail Urban&Station Design, Miami Beach, FL; and North Corridor Alternative Analysis&Station Area Design, Miami-Dade&Broward Counties, FL. Joshua Rak, Urban Design/Form Based Code, of B&A brings 10 years of Urban&Planning experience with extensive experience in the creation urban design details and zoning ordinances. He is experienced in formulation &implementation of the regulatory needs. Recent projects include the 2040 Strategic Master Plan, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, FL;TIGER Grant-Tampa Channelside,Tampa, FL; Marassi Marina Update;Village of Miami Shores Community Center Feasibility Study;West Dade Finding of Necessity; La Chorrera Development Plan, Panama and the Tapia Property in Panama. 11 . Traffic Engineering James E.Spinks III, PE, PTOE, Lochner, leads the Traffic Engineering. _ • Our team provides a broad range of professional traffic engineering services such as level of service/highway capacity analyses, I microscopic traffic simulation,traffic signal timing and optimization, i • - safety analysis. Lochner specializes in a full range of traffic engineering to solutions to achieve optimum levels of operation and safety for the ‘4115 roadway system, including: =,—=-, I • Qualitative Assessments ... • Left-Turn Phase Warrant Analysis • Traffic Engineering Research \x1.%AV ' • Traffic Operations Safety Before&After Studies M.. 7 • Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS) 1 • Signalization&Pavement Markings `J 1 • Parking&Origin-Destination Studies • Traffic Data Collection • Traffic Impact Studies • Operational Analysis • Benefit/Cost Analysis • Safety&Accident Studies • Safety/Crash Analysis • Net Present Value Analysis • Expected Value Crash Analysis • Traffic Signal Design • Travel Time and Delay Studies • Intersection Delay Studies 2017-126-KB 1 45 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R • Queue Analysis • Vehicle Gap Studies • Conflict Analysis • Spot Speed Studies • Sight Distance Analysis • Roadway/Highway Lighting Studies • Safe Curve Speed Studies • Collision Diagrams • Railroad Crossing Preemption Studies • Parking Analysis • Fatal Crash Reviews • High Crash Location Investigation • Road Safety Audits • Expressway and Arterial Level of Service Analysis • Intersection Analysis • Arterial Analysis • Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety • Mid-Block Crossing Warrants • Capacity Analysis • Safety Improvement Recommendations • Signal Warrant Analysis • Microscopic Simulation • Access Management • Traffic Signal Retiming, Phasing&Optimization • Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety The Lochner Team conducted hundreds of traffic studies for public and private clients covering all phases of traffic engineering, including data collection, analysis and projections,generation and evaluation of short and long term improvements for intersections and roadway segments, etc. In fact,our proposed Project Manager and traffic engineering lead,James E. Spinks III, PE, PTOE,for nearly 20 years has managed and participated in multiple traffic operations and safety contracts in FDOT District 6 and District 4; involving more than 300 TWOs investigating High Crash Locations, Fatal Crash Reviews,3R Safety Reviews, updates to the Skid Hazard Reporting System, Road Safety Audits, Intersection/Arterial Analysis, Signal and Left-turn Warrant Analysis, Speed Zone Studies,Traffic Operations Safety Reviews, Before and After Studies and Qualitative Assessments among others. Work-orders under this"on-call"contract may also be generated to address citizen's request or"hot spots"identified by elected officials, management or private citizens to correct operational or safety issues. In addition,there may be high crash locations or fatal crashes that may need to be investigated. Having provided similar services for nearly 20 years,the Lochner Team understand policies, procedures, project delivery requirements and how to coordinate with Claudia Diaz and Darlene Fernandez at the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works(DTPW)to get Coral Gables projects approved.We understand to develop feasible operational and safety recommendations that blossom into actual projects. Our staff's experience also includes traffic impact analyses,as well as the ability to review the work of other consultants performing traffic engineering work for our public and private clients. We also have an extensive amount of experience in the planning and design of the following important pedestrian/ bicyclists access/safety features:special crosswalk markings,overhead signage, bulb-outs, midblock crossings, refuge islands, pedestrian corrals, and over/underpasses. Multimodal considerations are essential to guarantee the proper balance between transportation mobility, connectivity and safety within the Complete Streets concept. We have extensive experience in conducting bicycle and pedestrian studies for all users within suburban environments and heavily congested urban settings. 2017-126-KB 1 46 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER The Lochner Team has extensive experience in performing traffic analysis at all levels from generalized planning analysis to the most complex and detailed operational analysis. Experience in macro analysis includes the use of deterministic/analytical tools such as Generalized Service Volume Tables, LOSPLAN 2012, HCS2010(HCM 2010 methodology), Sidra and Synchro 10(HCM 2010/6th Edition&Percentile methodologies). Micro Analysis experience (to perform microscopic simulations)includes SimTraffic 10, Corsim and Vissim 9. The Lochner Team will prepare traffic plans that increase safety, reduce traffic speeds and volumes, and discourage short-cuts through residential neighborhoods; creating a community livability and a more pedestrian-and bicycle-friendly environment. James E. Spinks III, PE, PTOE, Senior Transportation Engineer, of Lochner brings more than 18 years of experience. James has applied for 25 mph speed limit designations for multiple Miami-Dade cites, developed citywide traffic calming master plans for multiple municipalities with the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works(DTPW)that contained traffic circles, speed tables, and Complete Street concepts that included lane repurposing,wide sidewalks, mid-block crosswalks, landscaping, bike lanes, bulb-outs,high-emphasis intersection crosswalks, and operational and safety improvements at intersections. In addition to municipal projects,James also recently served as the Project Manager to the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization(TPO),where he managed the Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan,the 2015 and 2016 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Plans, and the Bike Friendly Miami-Dade Plan. Prior to joining Lochner,James recently managed a Traffic Operations and Safety Contract for FDOT Districts Six,where he completed the SW 107th Avenue, south of SW 88th Street Pedestrian Study that developed recommendations to mitigate one of highest pedestrian crash locations in Miami- Dade County, including a warranted mid-block pedestrian crossing. In addition,James also developed enhanced bicycle and pedestrian improvement recommendations on SR AtA in Sunny Isles Beach,where a high rate of cyclist and pedestrian crashes occur, including separated bike lanes. James is familiar with the local area, as a he recently managed engineering contracts with FDOT District Six Traffic Operations and Safety Office and the Miami-Dade County TPO,just prior to joining Lochner.James has completed more than 300 Traffic Operations TWOs for FDOT.James is adept with the Miami-Dade County permitting agencies and procedures, as well as FDOT. He has established relationships with the agency's review and permitting staff and understands their expected standards and procedures, ensuring a smooth and quick approval process for any type of project. He understands Miami-Dade's Miami-Dade Traffic Flow Modification(s)Street Closure(s) procedures and thresholds for traffic calming and is creative in obtaining funding for traffic studies,through alternative revenue sources. Matt Wey, PE, PTOE, Senior Transportation Engineer, of Lochner has 18 years of experience with providing comprehensive traffic engineering, multi-modal transportation planning and Project Development and Environment (PD&E)services throughout the State of Florida. His responsibilities serving as project manager and lead engineer on various multi-modal transportation planning projects/NEPA studies have included developing access management plans,conducting traffic impact and transportation corridor studies, developing design traffic memoranda.writing preliminary engineering reports and engaging in public involvement activities,documenting environmental determinations, performing conceptual roadway design,transportation cost estimating, reviewing enhancement project phase submittals and conducting technical analyses in support of Interchange Modification Reports(IMRs)and Interchange Operational Analysis Reports(IOARs). He recently completed task on the 15th St East/301 Blvd East PD&E Study from Tallevast Rd to US 41 in Bradenton, FL,where developed"complete streets" related recommendations, such as bicycle lanes,sidewalks, pedestrian crossings,street lighting, and roundabouts, as well as transit improvements. Brad Lucas, PE, Senior Transportation Engineer,of Lochner has more than 15 years of experience managing and designing projects for numerous state and local governments. He is an expert in roadway,freeway,signing, striping, traffic control and intersection design, including signals, roundabouts, CFIs, limited access,SPUIs, and diamond interchanges. He is also proficient in alternative development and analysis,and traffic analysis and simulation. Mr. Lucas has successfully completed quality designs for over 50 signalized intersections. He is well-versed in UDOT, AASHTO, and MUTCD standards and has gained extensive experience in conducting alternative analysis,designing 2017-126-KB 147 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER local street improvements and intersections, and developing multi-phase maintenance-of-traffic plans, construction phasing plans, and engineering estimates. Stefan Escanes, PE, Project Engineer,of Metric Engineering currently serves as Project Engineer for transportation planning and traffic operations projects. Responsibilities include performing traffic analyses;writing technical reports; communicating findings with design and planning staff and giving presentations of findings to clients. Recent experience includes the operational analysis for the Okeechobee Road PD&E Study in Miami, Florida with a network of over 25 intersections using Synchro and Vissim. In addition, a Transit Signal Prioritization Feasibility Study was performed for Central Lakeland using Vissim to determine the need and effectiveness of a Transit Signal Priority (TSP)system and bus queue jump lanes and the ability to implement either or both on three or four state highway corridors in the City of Lakeland. Sonia Shreffler-Bogart, PE, PTOE, Senior Traffic Engineer, of Metric Engineering experience includes assignments related to project management of traffic/transportation engineering and transportation planning/ site development projects.Tasks include working closely with other disciplines on multi-discipline projects: establishing methodologies and performing analyses;writing technical reports; communicating findings with staff; giving presentations of findings to clients,agencies and the public. Projects completed were in private and public sectors at international, state, regional and local levels. Recent projects include the Miami Beach Active Traffic Management, FDOT Districtwide Traffic Operations&Safety Studies Consultant Services and the West Grove Traffic Circle Feasibility Study for the City of Miami. 12. Public Involvement Magali Abad, MAGBE, leads the Public Involvement, supported by ACE Public Relations Group, LLC. MAGBE Public Consulting Services, Inc. is a woman owned minority firm, Meetings& founded in 1996 with offices in Miami-Dade County. MAGBE Hearing Media Community has designed and executed successful campaigns and Outreach Advisory projects that have changed public opinion and influenced Group behavior for local, State and Federal clients. MAGBE provides services in the areas of marketing, media and public Project information specializing in public involvement, grassroots Study outreach, neighborhood advocacy, public relations,job fairs, Mailing List& Group Small Group Newsletters Meetings business minority outreach, special events&festivals,survey &market research and public opinion polling. MAGBE possess vast experience in grant, proposal&contract writing as well as program implementation and management services. Project Agency Website N. Meetings MAGBE have successfully conducted public involvement programs for: • The Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) • Florida International University's Center for Aging • Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) • The City of Miami • Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners • South Florida Water Management District • Miami-Dade Expressway Authority • Miami-Dade Public Works • Miami-Dade Capital Improvements Department • Miami-Dade MPO 2017-126-KB J 48 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER • Native American Community • National Audubon Society ACE Public Relations Group, LLC(ACE PRG)is a Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)firm,with a fully operational office in Hollywood, Florida, and a team of bilingual (English/Spanish)professionals based locally in Miami-Dade County.ACE PRG provides marketing, public relations and public involvement services to government agencies, municipalities, and private organizations.Their three principles for successfully implementing effective public involvement programs include raising AWARENESS, sharing information through multiple COMMUNICATION channels and providing EDUCATION to our targeted audience.Thus, building trust through two-way communications.The ACE team has been strategically assembled to provide the City of Miami Beach a seasoned and reputable staff with proven experience on major transportation projects.They have a deep understanding of the City of Miami Beach operations and management. Their staff brings extensive experience in South Florida including overseeing the Public Involvement efforts for Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)District Four 1-595 Express Lanes Corridor Improvements Project, the largest Public, Private, Partnership(P3)project in the State of Florida. In addition,we have also provided community outreach and public involvement services for the City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects,the Florida Department of Transportation, District Four and District Six, and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. ACE PRG projects: • FDOT District Four, 1-595 Express Corridor Improvements Project-Broward County, FL(2009-2014) • 1-75 Express Lanes-Segment E-Broward County, FL(2013-2015) ACE PRG Staff experience/projects(with different firm): • City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects-Miami Beach, FL(2015-2016) • FDOT District Six, Public Communications&Special Projects(Drive Safe 95 Express)-Miami, Florida-(2015 -2016) • FDOT District Six, Miscellaneous Districtwide-Miami, FL(2015-2016) • FDOT District Six, SR 5/US 1/South Dixie Highway Safety Design Projects-Miami, FL(2015) • FDOT District Four-Various PD&Es Magali Abad, PIO Specialist, of MAGBE has 35 years serving the South Florida community. She is an experienced project manager with expert community relations&grass roots expertise. She is well regarded in both the Hispanic/ Latino and African American/Caribbean communities. Ms.Abad is an active member of several local,state and national civic organizations and is extremely committed to her community. She has been recognized for her dedication to the community for her past public service as past Chair of the Miami-Dade Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board and past Chair of the Miami-Dade County Commission for Women. Her career highlights include: • Successfully administered over 25 Federal Grants for USHUD totaling$2.1M • Developed, implemented and monitored community educational programs Irela Bague, Government Affairs, of MAGBE brings 20 years serving the South Florida community. She is an accomplished public relations, government affairs and business development specialist. Ms. Bague is a well- respected community leader currently serving on the National Parks Conservation Association's Regional Council is Past Chair of the Resiliency Committee of the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce, a founding member of Resiliency Florida and serves on the Board of Directors of Florida Water Advocates.Her career highlights include: • Governing Board Vice-Chair, South Florida Water Management District • Chair, Miami River Commission • Commission Aide, Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners Maggie Bruno, PIO Specialist, of ACE has more than 20 years of working with both public sector and private sector clients in the transportation industry encompassing a myriad of disciplines in communications, media relations, public information and project management. She has extensive experience in developing and managing 2017-126-KB 149 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R public information/communication programs,forming corporate partnerships, consensus building, interagency collaboration, community outreach, special event planning, high profile campaigns and crisis management. Ms. Bruno has provided consultant communication services to public sector clients in South Florida including the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)District Six and District Four, Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority. She is able to manage many projects and tasks successfully to meet established deadlines.As a long-time South Florida resident, she has worked extensively with local media and has developed strong working relationships with local officials, civic organizations and special interest groups throughout the tri-county area. Yasir Mercado, PIO Specialist, of ACE is a communications professional with 10 years of experience working with public and private sector clients. She is a fully bilingual(English/Spanish) Miami resident with exceptional interpersonal skills who is able to build strong professional relationships with her clients, stakeholders and various groups and organizations. She is highly organized and detail oriented. Ms. Mercado is adept at developing and implementing processes and procedures to achieve established goals and can manage multiple tasks and projects simultaneously while maintaining a high level of performance and meeting established deadlines. She has assisted with Community Awareness Plan (CAP)and Public Involvement Plan(PIP)development and prepared project materials using plain language,AP Style and agency guidelines for style and content. Ms. Mercado has extensive experience in directing and coordinating all communication efforts from start to finish. She prepares and presents project information to stakeholders, elected officials, homeowner associations, business owners, special interest groups and community groups. She is responsible for coordinating and facilitating all public meetings, creating and maintaining issues logs,stakeholder and elected official databases and project website pages. She has served on major governmental, municipal and statewide contracts including City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects, FDOT District Six Miscellaneous Districtwide, FDOT District Six, Public Communication Programs&Special Projects, and FDOT District Six SR 826/Palmetto Expressway and SR 836/Dolphin Expressway Interchange. MAGBE Experience includes: • Miami-Dade Water&Sewer: 42"Water Transmission Main between Biscayne Boulevard NE 5th Street to Port of Miami: Parson Brinkerhoff/WSP contracted MAGBE to provide public involvement services • City of Miami Beach-Central Bayshore South Flood Risk: Irela Bague, MAGBE's Director of Government Affairs provided support for the coordination and planning of the open house hosted for the residents of Central Bayshore South. March 2017—April 2017.Client Reference,Susanna Torriente, (305)673-7000 ,ext. 6486, SusanneTorriente@miamibeachfl.gov • Village of Key Biscayne Sea Level Rise Adaptation&Risk Assessment: Irela Bague, MAGBE's Director of Government Affairs was the lead on the project tasked to plan, coordinate, conduct and moderate(2) public town hall style meetings present the results of a resident survey, review the final flood projections and adaptation plan, and engaged in planning for next steps with residents and the Village.July 2016 —January 2017. Client Reference: Key Biscayne Community Foundation, Rurriya Sundaram, rumya@ keybiscaynefoundation.org • Miami-Dade County Public Works: Design Services for Roadway Improvements to NW 58th Street in Doral, Florida,SRS Engineering contracted MAGBE to provide public involvement services. Client Reference: Ignacio Serralta, (305)662-8887, ignacio@srs-corp.com • Miami-Dade Science Museum Construction Project:Suffolk Construction contracted MAGBE to provide research and coordination for the planning of a Certified CSBE matchmaking event to inform local contractors of construction opportunities available to small firms.July 2012 to September 2012 Client Reference: Suffolk: Donald Hergenreder, 305-374-1107 • Miami-Dade MPO: 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Study—Jacobs Engineering Group contracted MAGBE to provide assistance with the 2040 Transportation Plan Study the scope consisted of providing the MPO with innovative marketing campaign options to encourage the general public to use Miami-Dade Transit. January 2012 to June 2012 Client Reference:Jacobs Engineering Group: Linda Mifsud, 954-246-1412 • City of Miami Marlins Stadium Site Parking-MAGBE partnered with Suffolk Construction as to serve as project PIO and Community Liaison for the Marlins Stadium Site Parking project. MAGBE provided research, communication vehicles and coordinated outreach events for local DBE's and SBE's certified firms in Miami- Dade County.January 2010 to August 2011 Client Reference: Suffolk:Tim Sterling,305-374-1107 or City of Miami CIP Director-305-416-1286 2017-126-KB 150 Tab 2 I Experience &Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R • Camillus House New Development Project-MAGBE partnered with Coastal Construction to assist with the Camillus House construction project. MAGBE developed a comprehensive outreach program, coordinated and conducted a local Job Fair to promote employment opportunities to individuals within a 5 mile radius of the construction site in accordance to Overtown CRA requirements. Over 25 jobs were created as a result of the Camillus Overtown Job Fair. February 2010 to April 2011 Client Reference: Coastal Construction: Steve Silverman, 305-559-4900 • Miami-Dade MPO: GPC IV-07-Near Term Plan for Improved Transportation Services-Jacobs Engineering Group contracted MAGBE to provide assistance with the 2040 Transportation Plan Study the scope consisted of providing the MPO with innovative marketing campaign options to encourage the general public to use Miami-Dade Transit.April 2010 to October 2010 Client Reference:Jacobs Engineering Group,954-246-1247 • City of Miami North Bayshore Drive Drainage Improvement Project- MAGBE served as project PIO, provided communications and conducted public meetings with area residents and businesses with regards to project schedule and traffic impacts. March 2009 to October 2009 Client Reference: PBS&J Humberto Alonso, 305- 392-7275 or City of Miami CIP/PIO 305-416-1286 • FDOT District 6-Miscellaneous District Wide Public Involvement Consultant Services. Community Awareness Contract#250673-1-32-Public Involvement Sub consultant providing support and coordination for data research,coordination of governmental briefings, public meeting and public communication services and mailings. From 2007 to 2010CIient Reference: Maribel Lena, P.E., FDOT Project Manager FDOT District VI. FDOT(305)470-5208 • Miami-Dade County Publics Work Department-NW 7 Avenue Corridor Reversible Lane Study(PDE)MAGBE served as Public Involvement Coordinator for a feasibility study for roadway improvements to the NW 7th Avenue Corridor.The PD&E Study is an integrated effort involving engineering analysis and environmental evaluation for the design of a reversible lane. MAGBE provided support and coordination for data research, coordination of governmental briefings, public meetings and public communication services and mailings. All accomplished within the context of a pro-active and continuous public participation program.April 2007 to August 2008 Client Reference: Sven Weydahl, P.E. Director, Production Management.BHA Inc. (954)334- 2745Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization-Kendall Corridor Alternatives Analysis • City of Miami-Orange Bowl Redevelopment Study- MAGBE was selected by Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.as the Public Involvement consultant. MGABE coordinated all communications and public meetings for City of Miami area residents, businesses and organizations located near and around the Orange Bowl community. From 2006 to 2007 Client Reference:John Paccione,Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.(312) 228-2626 • FDOT- District 6(PD&E Study)SR5/Brickell Avenue Corridor from SE.25th Road to SE.4th Street. MAGBE served as PIO for a feasibility study to provide roadway improvements for Brickell Avenue.The PD&E Study is an integrate effort involving engineering analysis and environmental evaluation, MAGBE provided support and coordination for data research, coordination of governmental briefings, public meetings and public communication services and mailings.All accomplished within the context of a pro-active and continuous public participation program. March 2005 to October 2006 Client Reference: FDOT PD&E Project Manager FDOT District VI. FDOT(305)470-5208 13. Surveying fEr\ Manuel G.Vera&Associates Inc. (MGV)is qualified as DBE, SBE, MBE and CBE.The main (Corporate)office is located in Miami-Dade County,our Central Florida office is located in Orange County, and we also have an office in Jupiter, Florida. MGV was established in Miami- Dade County in 1977. Since then,survey and mapping is what we have specialized in and is all we do. In over our 40 years of existence,there has not been a survey task,terrain, or problem we have not seen. MGV is a unique firm, in that it has the capability and technology of our competitors, but our principles are patterned by a family business with a service oriented and sound quality control ideology.This ideology is the foundation for our firm, and the reason MGV is revered as one of the premier survey firms in South Florida. It is one of the main reasons we have maintained an excellent rating from past and present contracts. MGV will always perform our projects to our client's specifications, by meeting and exceeding standards and expectations.This is why we support,as 2017-126-KB I 51 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications LOC H N E R CITY OF MIAMI BEACH subconsultants, hundreds of engineering and construction firms throughout the State of Florida. In addition to our Florida Department of Transportation experience with District 4(Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River Counties), District 6(Miami-Dade and Monroe County), and Florida's Turnpike Enterprise,our firm has been, and is currently, providing Miscellaneous Survey and Right of Way Mapping Services to a number of Cities, Counties, and Municipalities throughout South Florida, as well as State and Federal Agencies such as: South Florida Water Management District, South Florida Rail Transit Agency,All Aboard Florida, FEMA, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade Transit, Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County, Monroe County, City of Miami, City of Doral, City of Miami Gardens, City of Port St. Lucie, City of Key West, and countless of private engineering clients providing survey support for miscellaneous engineering design and design-build projects. MGV is dedicated and committed to providing excellent service and complete client satisfaction. MGV has a highly- trained staff of professional surveyors and associates with extensive experience in a wide range of surveying and mapping services.Our staff is the foundation of our firm.We employ a staff of over 50 skilled survey personnel. Among these, eight employees are registered PSM's(which combined, have over two centuries of survey experience), five survey technicians, and nine fully staffed and equipped survey crews, in which three are SUE capable. MGV's key personnel range from 10 years,to over 30 years of experience in surveying—more importantly, with our firm. MGV has the ability to perform all survey tasks using either traditional methodologies such as EFB data collection, Electronic Total Stations/levels, hydrographic[sonar/GPS], GPS/RTK, and the latest in 3D Lidar Static Scanning. Recent advances in scanning technologies have opened the door to the future in 3D surveying. MGV was one of the pioneers in the use of 3D laser scanning technology, having purchased our first Scanner in 2004.All our office support staff are well-versed and trained in Caice, Microstation&Geopak,AutoCAD Civil 3D,FDOT Hector and EFBP, Pedds, Electronic Signatures and will continue to parallel the industries software advances. 14. Landscape Architecture • Randy Hollingworth, Bermello Ajamil&Partners Inc. (B&A), leads Landscape Architecture.The B&A Landscape Architecture team focuses , Lir on providing clients with innovative and sustainable design solutions _ that celebrate the environment.The B&A Landscape Architecture team is dedicated to deliveringdistinctive projects that respond to the needs , u of clients and provide contemporary responses to the historic, cultural and environmental attributes of each site.Their commitment to achieving client's goals, responding to community character and responsibly using natural resources are all integral parts of the design process on every project. As designers,they pride themselves in the ability to listen to the needs of client and to reflect their dreams and visions into creative landscape solutions.The B&A Landscape Architecture team has a proven track record of successfully completing award winning projects that reflect both our design ability and our expertise in collaboration with government officials, community representatives and private developers.As a multi-disciplinary firm with an international practice, B&A excels in the coordination of complex projects in varied locations throughout the world. B&A projects are each born of a creative, problem-solving process.As a result,our clients are assured of a product that not only meets requirements, but exemplifies quality,functionality,enduring, and very often,award-winning design. B&A Landscape Architecture services include: • Park Planning and Design • Amphitheater/Entertainment • Transit Planning and Design • Streetscape Design Venue Design • Aesthetic and Design Guidelines • City Wide Parks Master Planning • Bikeway Planning and Design • Feasibility Studies/Analysis • Signage and Wayfinding • Art in Public Places • Major Use Permits • Community Beautification • Environmental Planning • Redevelopment Plans Programs • Neighborhood Planning • Neighborhood Improvement • Athletic Facility Design • Comprehensive Planning Plans 2017-126-KB I 52 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R Randy Hollingworth, Director of Planning and Landscape,of B&A has 30+years' experience in Urban Design &Landscape. He has prepared development plans for a wide range of project types. He has a large and diverse portfolio of landscape design oriented projects. He has developed master plans and design guidelines for commercial and retail areas, office parks and residential communities in numerous waterfront locations throughout Florida. Kirk J. Olney, RLA Landscape Architect, of B&A has over 16 years of experience in landscape architecture, involving parks, streetscapes and roadway landscape design. He has several years of master planning, conceptual and detailed design,the production and management of construction documents. He also has experience preparing and submitting applications to regulatory agencies and responding to comments accordingly to obtain required permits. His special area of interest and expertise is the use of tropical and subtropical plant material. 15. Environmental Sustainability Analysis George Robert Myers III, Metric Engineering, leads Environmental Sustainability Analysis. Metric Engineering provides support for environmental permitting and all related issues including wetlands,wildlife, arboriculture, contamination,and water resources. In conjunction with roadway design, PD&E studies, municipal support, and land planning,our ecological consulting services allow us to facilitate the direction of all aspects of a project. By using a single resource capable of all considerations that is also current on the latest regulatory requirements and technological advancements, our clients save valuable time and money.Whether unbiased recommendations for tree maintenance practices or habitat restoration and mitigation, Metric's abilities in assessment, permitting,and planning translate to a distinct advantage for our clients. Metric has a team of industry- leading experts in urban forestry, arboriculture,and marine and coastal ecology provide numerous services to state agencies, utilities and private waterfront developments. Services include: ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING Removals,&Permitting MARINE&COASTAL ECOLOGY Wetland Delineation&Quality Expert Testimony&Third-party SERVICES Assessment Evaluations Benthic Resource Assessments Protected Wildlife Habitat Hazard Tree&Risk Assessments Water Quality Monitoring Identification&Relocations Tree Health Evaluations Fish Assemblage Surveys GIS Ecological Features Map Compliance Support Delineation Of Coastal Wetland Environmental Resource Permitting Tree Preservation Support for High- Habitats Tree Permitting Value&Historic Trees Permitting Mitigation Site Design Construction Monitoring for Tree Seagrass, Mangrove, Marshland, Construction Monitoring Preservation &Artificial Reef Habitat Mitigation Planting&Maintenance Bid Design URBAN FORESTRY AND Packages Construction Services ARBORICULTURE Mitigation And Impact Site Landscape Plan Review& Monitoring Inspections Essential Fish Habitat Assessments Tree Inventories,Appraisals, For NEPA&PD&E Studies George Robert Myers III, Senior Environmental Scientist,of Metric Engineering is experienced providing a wide array of environmental assessments and technical reports,with an emphasis on PD&E,wildlife surveys,and environmental permitting. Mr. Myers has held USFWS 10(a)(1)(A)endangered species permits for 20 federally listed species, and is a proven PD&E scientist who has managed PD&E projects in five FDOT districts. Recent projects include, US 90 PD&E Study in Santa Rosa County, FL,Tri-Rail Coastal Link PD&E Study,Oslo Road PD&E Study, Indian River County,and the SR 25(Okeechobee Road)PD&E Study, Miami-Dade County. Caitlin Hill, Marine Biologist,of Metric Engineering is an AAUS authorized scientific diver who has been conducting marine habitat and species assessments as well as restoration practices in South Florida for the last seven years. Ms. Hill specializes in marine science surveying including benthic marine resource surveys and health assessments, 2017-126-KB 153 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER coral gardening/fragmentation and restoration practices, and fish identification surveys. Ms. Hill is also experienced in providing a wide array of environmental support services in South Florida for technical reports,wildlife surveys and reporting, NEPA documentation, habitat surveys, and permitting efforts. Recent projects include the Boca Chica Seagrass Restoration Site—Naval Air Station, Key West, Bahia Honda Coral Relocation and Monitoring—Bahia Honda Bridge, Bahia Honda, and the Grove Isle Bridge Rehabilitation Permitting, Miami-Dade County, FL. Daniel Parobok,Arborist/Landscape Inspector, of Metric Engineering specializes in urban and municipal arboriculture and landscape technical oversight including installation,establishment, and site design review. Mr. Parobok also has experience in environmental compliance and scientific surveys including species surveys, invasive species identification and removal,wetland delineations, permit and code compliance, and environmental permitting for various jurisdictions including state, county, and municipal levels. Recent projects include Statewide Arborist Services for Vegetation Management Permitting, FDOT Central Office, Districtwide Environmental Permit Compliance, FDOT D6,and Technical Landscape Review and Inspection Services on Florida's Turnpike System. Ryan St. George, Senior Environmental Scientist, of Metric Engineering has 13 years of experience. He spent eight years as a Natural Resource Specialist II for Broward County's Aquatic and Wetland Resource Program primarily serving as a lead wetland permit application reviewer and compliance/enforcement officer, and 4 years with Miller Legg as an Environmental Scientist. He now provides environmental permitting,wetland delineation, mitigation monitoring and design, natural resource survey, and related support services for a variety of projects. Mr. St.George has strong relationships with Federal, State, and local regulatory staff and an in-depth familiarity with environmental permitting requirements in the South Florida region. 16. Geotechnical Support Raj Krishnasmy, PE,Tiera South Florida(TSF)will lead Geotechnical Support.TSF provides a complete range of geotechnical engineering services. Our geotechnical design solutions define and reduce construction and long-term performance risks. Whether buildings, airport facilities,transportation systems, landfills,dams, or other civil and private projects, our engineers have the experience and expertise to handle the most technically demanding projects.TSF also owns a large, diverse fleet of eight drill rigs with automatic hammers (truck-mounted,track-mounted, rotary,tripod,ATV, barge/overwater)capable of drilling in challenging conditions whether remote, soft, marshy, over-water, difficult access or environmentally sensitive areas.We also employee MOT(Maintenance of Traffic)certified staff to safely perform drilling services in high traffic areas.TSF offers geotechnical engineering services in: • Onshore and offshore subsurface exploration • Laboratory testing and analysis of soils and rocks • Pavement evaluations and design • Deep and shallow foundation analysis and design • Site preparation recommendations • Slope stability analysis • Soil reinforcement • Corridor studies • Expert witness testimony • Unknown foundation evaluation • Peer review • Value engineering Construction Materials Testing- During construction,TSF sampling, monitoring and quality control services cover every phase of construction and all materials used.TSF services are guided by project specifications and ensure sound, safe and quality construction.They maintain a fully equipped, in-house soils,concrete, and aggregate testing laboratory certified by Construction Materials Engineering Council(CMEC)and approved by Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT).Their field and laboratory technicians hold industry-recognized certifications(ACI/CTQP/ 2017-126-K61 54 - a.'`2 E ler ence & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R PCI/FPCA)for aggregates, asphalt,concrete, and earthwork testing as well as drilled shaft, augercast pile, and pile driving installation monitoring. Services include: • Soils/aggregates/concrete/masonry/asphalt • Earthwork testing and observations • Concrete testing and placement observation • Masonry, grout, and mortar sampling and testing • Asphalt paving monitoring • Asphalt plant observations and monitoring • MSE wall installation monitoring • Pre-stressed yard observations • Drilled shaft installation monitoring • Pile driving installation monitoring • Pre and post construction survey • Vibration monitoring Inspections and Specialty Testing—TSF also provides building inspection services and specialty testing services to verify that the Construction Manager maintains appropriate methods and the construction complies with the Construction Contract Documents.Their inspectors review the completeness and accuracy of the work completed and includes licensed Florida Building inspectors as well as highly experienced and licensed Special Inspectors who, under the State of Florida Building Standards, are capable of performing threshold inspections. Services include: • Threshold/special inspections • Non-destructive testing • Roof installation observations • Torque testing and inspections • Welding inspections • Fire proofing testing • Floor flatness testing • Bolt inspections Raj Krishnasmy, PE,Geotechnical Engineer,of Tiera South Florida has 29 years of experience and is a Florida State registered Geotechnical Engineer with over 29 years of experience. Raj oversees the geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing, and inspection services operations. His experience consists of successfully completing over 3,500 public and private projects, highlighted by 120+FDOT projects,design-build projects totaling close to$2 billion in construction costs, and prominent projects such as Florida Atlantic University's Stadium, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport's South Runway Expansion(featuring the largest MSE wall in Florida), and 1-95 Express Lanes. He serves as Project Manager for continuing contracts with over 20 Florida public agencies with a history of repeatedly retaining those contracts through successful, cost-effective and prompt execution of each task order. His daily involvement with the in-house and field operations of the construction and geotechnical services departments provides him the"hands-on"experience and knowledge of current construction codes and construction practices throughout the State of Florida. Raj focuses on providing the client with a consistently accurate, cost-effective quality product that is delivered on time and within budget. Kumar Vedula, PE,Geotechnical and Construction Materials Inspections, of Tiera South Florida has over 21 years of experience providing engineering services for a wide variety of geotechnical projects involving foundation design, slope stability analysis,WEAP analysis and interpreting PDA reports,excavation support, and construction inspection. His extensive experience includes foundation inspections(shallow and deep foundations), soil modification (dynamic compaction, stone columns), preloading, excavations, backfilling,and post construction monitoring. Mr.Vedula has served as a principal inspector on numerous surcharging and settlement evaluations of organic laden soils assignments. His project experience includes 300+geotechnical engineering studies for various projects types including parks, piers,shoreline stabilization,dredging, bridges, roadways, utilities, high rise buildings, schools and government facilities. Mr.Vedula has authored and co-authored papers published in national and international publications. 2017-126-KB 155 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R 17. Intelligent Transportation Systems Sonia Shreffler-Bogart, PE, PTOE, Metric Engineering, leads ",- . ; Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS). Metric's staff has planned, designed, inspected, integrated and tested hundreds of millions „; .:; -of dollars(more than 60 ITS projects)over the last decade, ..”" ' " " I' 'i$ i including various ITS projects for the FDOT D6.This unprecedented Roads .n ri: experience ensures that their staff will have no learning curve in any aspect of this contract.They offer ITS Design, Communication 4. •4111,[11" Design, Inspection and Integration Services,training, Design/Build Areas dmrardiat JNnrtsc«dm. Criteria Package preparation, project plans and specifications, perform field reviews and provide comments on plans and specifications, prepare SEMP submittals, and support all of the infrastructure as well as hardware/software initiatives as needed. Because Metric's ITS Staff is not only a production design staff, but also a construction management, integration and TMC operations staff.This gives Metric unique insight into the requirements of ITS projects,allowing them to anticipate and avoid conflicts during both design and construction. Close coordination with the DBOM ITS&Smart Parking System Project, FDOT and County staff will be acted upon as soon as the task work order is issued. Metric currently provides traffic monitoring services as part of the Active Traffic Management program for the City of Miami Beach for 14-hours/day year round with extended hours during special events.Traffic Operators utilize the CCTV cameras and Bluetooth/WiFi vehicle detection devices to provide travel time reports to City staff and signal engineer in order to evaluate and implement signal timing modifications as appropriate.The CCTV cameras and Bluetooth/WiFi devices utilize wireless network equipment to transfer data from the devices to a central server where the data is processed. Solar power is utilized for providing power to all the data collection stations.There are four main objectives for the Active Traffic Management program (1)Minimize traffic impacts. (2)Manage and provide orderly flow of traffic. (3)Minimize the use of police resources for traffic control activities. (4)Relay critical real-time travel information via social media(Twitter)and/or Variable Message Signs(VMS signs). In addition, Metric is currently conducting arterial analyses and signal retiming for the Indian Creek Drive/Abbott Avenue/Harding Avenue and MacArthur Causeway/5th Street corridors through our FDOT D6 Districtwide traffic operations contract.Additional traffic studies in the City of Miami Beach include the SR A1A/Collins Avenue at 63rd Street Northbound Loop Detector Installation Evaluation. Eland Engineering,founded in 2009, Eland Engineering, Inc. is a professional engineering firm specializing in planning, design, integration and construction management of Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)and advanced technology solutions.Their founding principles will help Miami Beach to develop innovative,cost effective engineering and the cutting edge technology solutions that enhance the mobility and safety of transportation infrastructures. Eland provides the Lochner team with resilient expertise in the specialized ITS systems. Their 30 engineers, network specialists and computer professionals are dedicated to provide ITS solutions to our clients. Eland staff members are highly experienced in all elements of ITS, such as fiber optic and wireless communication technologies, CCTV cameras, dynamic message signs,vehicle detection stations,toll collection,and IP/Ethernet network architectures. Sonia Shreffler-Bogart, PE, PTOE, Senior Traffic Engineer,of Metric Engineering experience includes assignments related to project management of traffic/transportation engineering and transportation planning/ site development projects.Tasks include working closely with other disciplines on multi-discipline projects; establishing methodologies and performing analyses;writing technical reports; communicating findings with staff; giving presentations of findings to clients, agencies and the public. Projects completed were in private and public sectors at international, state, regional and local levels. Recent projects include the Miami Beach Active Traffic Management, FDOT Districtwide Traffic Operations&Safety Studies Consultant Services and the West Grove Traffic Circle Feasibility Study for the City of Miami. 2017-126-KB 1 56 Tab 2 ( Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Stefan Escanes, PE, Project Engineer, of Metric Engineering currently serves as Project Engineer for transportation planning and traffic operations projects. Responsibilities include performing traffic analyses;writing technical reports; communicating findings with design and planning staff and giving presentations of findings to clients. Recent experience includes the operational analysis for the Okeechobee Road PD&E Study in Miami, Florida with a network of over 25 intersections using Synchro and Vissim. In addition, a Transit Signal Prioritization Feasibility Study was performed for Central Lakeland using Vissim to determine the need and effectiveness of a Transit Signal Priority (TSP)system and bus queue jump lanes and the ability to implement either or both on three or four state highway corridors in the City of Lakeland. Bo Qian, PE, Senior ITS Engineer, of Eland Engineering has 20 years of experience in project management, engineering, planning, design, construction and maintenance in Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS).As the project manager for FDOT District 4 ITS General Consultant contract for the past 10 years, he has assisted FDOT in the successful rollout of extensive ITS deployment and express lanes programs in the District. He is responsible for all major ITS projects/initiatives for D4 ITS program in various aspects of planning, design, system integration, construction, operations,and maintenance. In addition, as the ITS lead for 1-75 Express Lanes, Segment A, B,C, D &E, in Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, Bo is responsible for the development of the corridor wide ITS Master Plan and technical functional requirements, assisting the bid proposal review, providing post design support, and providing coordination with D4, D6 and FTE in reviewing and recommending responses to the request for information and project submittals. Rossi Gaudio, PE,Senior ITS Engineer, of Eland Engineering has 7 years of experience in management and data collection for a variety of ITS projects including overseeing the ramp signaling system in Miami-Dade County, creating and modifying tolling parameters for the Interstate 95(1-95)High Occupancy Toll(HOT)lanes(Express Lanes)in Miami-Dade County, and designing incident management and Maintenance of Traffic(MOT)plans for the 1-95 Express Lanes. 18. Smart Parking - Jim Corbett, CAPP,Walker Parking,will lead Parking.Walker has been the : ;- , parking industry's premier consultant for over 50 years and continues to focus r_ ,e! gt=,r.�= on developing solutions that are realistic, implementable and cost-effective, by utilizing cutting edge technology and the creativity of their outstanding people. Walker Parking pioneered the concept of the mega-parking structure at theme parks, airports, and international developments,furthered the use of and -1110 improved upon the concept of shared parking at mixed-use developments, and were instrumental in the development of design standards for accessible parkers.Walker is one of the first firms to demonstrate how strategic parking planning can help cities and towns promote economic development and improve the quality of life for residents. Walker served as the parking consultant for the first privatization of a municipal parking system and has continued to assist with dozens of public/private partnership projects. Walker staff works to improve the sustainability of projects by using materials and building techniques that will extend the useful life of a facility and reduce the impact on the environment;that are working within the industry to examine opportunities for adaptable reuse of existing and future parking facilities; and from a consulting standpoint, they have developed a holistic planning approach that integrates parking into the overall master mobility solution for communities, institutions and the private sector.Walker Parking offers expertise in: ■ Design - Architecture/Engineering - Functional Design - Lighting 2017-126-KB 157 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R - Automated Parking - Sustainability • Analysis - Planning Studies - Operations - Financial - Technology • Restoration CloudParc is a smart city platform with parking as its first use case. Currently,there are many great evolutionary parking solutions and many municipalities still have meters and meter readers and consumers working hard to make a payment and then to avoid tickets while municipalities struggle and fight for parking revenues.With CloudParc,the consumer can park quickly and go, paying for exactly what they use to the minute.The municipality collects what it deserves. Convenience and cash,total win-win. The CloudParc parking application is a fully automated pay by plate parking system. It applies machine learning, a form of artificial intelligence,with machine vision.There's also variable and dynamic pricing. Finally,though parking is the core of the technology, there are other applications available with the technology that can be applied to almost all levels of smart city including but not limited to infrastructure maintenance,security,and data collection and the technology can be adjusted per municipality. This is the first parking system that can offer this level of smart city hub convenience. The disruptive CloudParc platform uses advanced machine vision and artificial intelligence to automate the entire parking lifecycle including detect parking space availability, add dynamic and variable pricing, meter automatically, capture and enforce parking violations, collect payment, and more as well as track real time traffic and incident data via mobile apps, and provide security/surveillance, private intelligence and many other smart city applications (beyond parking)via third parties through the CloudParc API. Some CloudParc features include: • First fully automated visual pay-by-plate parking system • Real time data capture • Eliminate metered parking and metered parking violations • Provides personalized services • Enforces, enhances, develops, and tracks new and existing permitting programs seamlessly and without mounds of paperwork and bulky permits • Tracks pedestrian and bicycle traffic and flow • Increases capture and enforcement 2-4x's existing rates • Dynamic pricing based on demand, progressive violation,dimension, and more • Offers features applicable to or as smart city hubs • Tracking and charging for ride shares and autonomous vehicles • Other use cases include subscriptions for real estate developers, urban planners, security companies,data analytics,transportation consultants • Offers data gathering, security, land use planning information, infrastructure maintenance,transportation, communications, resiliency, and logistics opportunities • Special port and airport applications • Becomes more relevant as the municipalities and automobiles become smarter Jim Corbett, CAPP, Senior Parking Professional, of Walker Parking is an innovative parking professional with more than 20 years of successful parking operation leadership and fiscal governance.Jim is a Certified Administrator of Public Parking(CAPP). Jim joined Walker Parking Consultants after a ten-year career as the Parking Division Manager with the City of Tampa where he managed a$17 million annual budget with one million dollars of capital improvement designation per annum.The City operates thirty off-street locations with 11,372 spaces and 1,700 on- street metered spaces.While with the City of Tampa,Jim managed three Parking Technology projects; On-street parking pay stations, Off-street parking access and revenue control system and Mobile payment platform.Jim represented the City throughout the evaluation of the technology and equipment and the selection of the preferred 2017-126-KB 158 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER • technology provider.Jim also represented the City throughout the installation and testing of the new technology and equipment. Jon Martins,AICP, CAPP, Senior Parking Professional, of Walker Parking specializes in parking planning and operations consulting on a variety of projects for municipalities,developers, hospitals, airports, colleges, and universities.Jon is a Certified Administrator of Public Parking (CAPP)and American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP).Jon is a frequent presenter at various parking conferences across the US, often discussing new technology that is changing the face of the parking industry.Jon has also written and co-wrote articles for industry publications including"Parking: More Customers, Less Cost"The Parking Professional, March 2013. Steven Nerayoff, Founder, CloudParc • Acts as CEO, direct liaison between the Board and management. • Serial entrepreneur who started 7+companies. • Raised over$100 million for his own and other private companies. • Founder&CEO of Maple Ventures, a Venture Capital firm primarily focused on emerging technologies including consumer Internet companies, socially conscious enterprises,and emerging payment and currency technologies. • Leading proponent of the Bitcoin 2.0 Movement and has been partnering with investment bankers from firms such as Barclays and Morgan Stanley on how the BlockChain can revolutionize the financial industry. • In cooperation with Joe Grundfest, Steven structured the second largest crowdfunding in history for Ethereum (a Bitcoin 2.0 company), to create a totally new structure that would work for BlockChain oriented companies. Approximately 10 other companies have now copied this new model. • Founded Freedom Eldercare, one of the country's largest private-pay home health care providers.This structured deal was the first company in the home healthcare industry to be sold to a private equity firm and won M&A deal of the year in 2009 by M&A Advisor. • Founded iOffer.com,the Web's leading negotiation-based person-to-person marketplace and third largest marketplace on the Internet, behind eBay and Amazon.com. • Other companies he has founded and co-founded include: Fleetwood Owen(now Cooper Owen,the world's largest celebrity memorabilia company)and eWanted.com (the Internet's leading marketplace for person-to- person"want ads"). • Steven began his professional journey as an attorney with Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe,where his practice involved technology, M&A, structured finance transactions,tax and corporate work. • Steven has a JD from Tulane University and a Masters of Law in Taxation from New York University. Tom Wong, Chief Technology Officer, CloudParc • 22 years of experience in the parking,transportation, and telecom industries as engineering executive. • Registered Professional Engineer,with a Bachelor's Degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of British Columbia, and is co-inventor of 17 US Patents. • Created a revolutionary system design,which resulted in 18 US patents along with a number of additional pending patents. Progressively demonstrated system utility by creating proof-of-concepts and beta pilots with equipment installed on-street and functional. • Vice President of Engineering at Photo Violation Technologies—Guided PVT from one-off prototype stage to post-revenue phase with multiple 24x7 live operating locations across North America,each with a municipal mesh Wi-Fi infrastructure deployed. Launched two new products and made significant contribution towards company going public.Company was nominated by IBM for BCTIA"Best of IT"and"Most Promising Startup" awards. • Director of Engineering at Novax Industries, overseeing the development of Traffic Signal Controllers,Traffic Cabinets, and wireless Transit Signal Priority(TSP)Systems. Mr.Wong led the team in creating the innovative multi-million dollar TSP system and deployed it at a number of transit companies in cities such as Chicago, Vancouver and Edmonton,totaling$5 million in contract value. The system achieved Final Acceptance in every implementation, and the value of the system was further affirmed by the establishment of Support and Services Contracts worth annually approximately a tenth of the total capital expenditure. • Uniserve, a public, National Telecommunications Service Provider with 300,000 subscribers-operates multiple call centers with 150 seats in total. Key role in acquisition of a VoIP company in order for Uniserve to 2017-126-KB 159 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER begin offering high-margin high-growth products.Achieved improved IT infrastructure efficiency and system availability through virtualization technologies. Reduced customer-impacting network and system problems by 70%. ■ Contributed to MCI WorldCom's expansion into 4 new countries. Reduced network downtime by 20%as a result of conceiving and implementing a unique protocol-independent management system using SCADA 19. Grant Writing jr,- zr Robert Ruano, Ecostrata Services, leads Grant Writing. Ecostrata Services, ) t, founded in 2010, Ecostrata Services builds on 26 years' experience in the private, government, and non-profit sectors to create solutions for clients. Their primary service is geared to organizations facing shortages in their funding streams or that are looking for ways to grow their business. Ecostrata works to identify the client's needs first, rather than attempting to fit an �? available resource to that client, ensuring a focus geared to each client's unique needs. From grants,to government services,to general fundraising, Ecostrata is here to help the City of Coral Gables. Services offered by Ecostrata Services include: Grants and Fundraising Their staff has helped bring over$70 million dollars in funding to South Florida in the last 15 years.That is thanks to meticulous funding research, attention to detail, and highly competitive funding applications. Planning and research is essential to a process of securing new funding, but so are experience working with funders and understanding what makes them want to invest in your program.Whether working with a Foundation Chair or submitting an online grant application,they have the experience and knowledge to increase the City of Coral Gables award rate and bring the dollars you need most for the transportation system. While they work on many types of grant applications,they specialize in capital projects for municipalities: parks,tree plantings, large equipment purchases,transportation infrastructure, and stormwater projects. Government Services Dealing with the labyrinth that is government, at all levels, is made significantly easier when you know the people on the inside and understand what they are trying to accomplish. Ecostrata personnel have experience working with local, state and federal bureaucracies and can therefore achieve results that may elude others.When a client needs to negotiate an agreement or access unpublicized funding, they call us for assistance. Sponsorships If you're organizing an event, call Ecostrata first to assist with identifying and reaching out to businesses and foundations that might have an interest in supporting your cause.They have experience with trade shows, community events, festivals, and informal gatherings. Environmental Projects While many organizations are looking to be green or sustainable, most are finding that it is difficult to choose the right steps that will achieve the best results. Likewise,while management may be on board, it takes committed employees and a culture that can embrace an environmentally friendly attitude.After helping craft many sustainability documents and ordinances in South Florida, Ecostata staff is uniquely qualified to assist the City of Coral Gables in getting truly'green' results. Robert Ruano, Grant Specialist, of Ecostrata Services has over 26 years of management experience, both in the private and public sector. His experience includes many years in City of Miami government,overseeing all grant applications and environmental initiatives.Among his accomplishments are a successful state grant that saved six acres of prime urban green space from development and the completion of a climate action plan that put the city on the path to sustainability. Since founding Ecostrata Services in 2010, he has worked with nonprofits, municipalities and private entities looking for funding or access to government programs. He is familiar with local, state,federal and foundation grant programs in a variety of functional areas. Robert believes that community service is crucial to being 2017-126-KB 160 Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER a good corporate citizen, as such, he volunteers and chairs several community boards and volunteers at community events. Currently, he serves on the USDA's National Urban&Community Forestry Advisory Council, Miami-Dade County's Planning Advisory Board, and Coral Gables Parks&Recreation Advisory Board. He is also a board member and was the Founding Chairman of Bike Walk Coral Gables and is a member of the Green Mobility Network.These organizations benefit from free advice, hours and dollars that help them help our own community. 20. Traffic Data Collection Glenn Davis, Quality Counts(QC),will lead Data <ux. Collection. Quality Counts is a full service traffic data -°r cam" a• collection firm founded in 2003 in Portland, Oregon. §ti x i Since its inception, QC has grown to a nationwide data %. collection firm with offices around the country. Our *; dedication to our core values of Quality, Character, and -i Customer Attentiveness are the not-so-secret keys to our success. Combine this with our drive to stay at the cutting-edge of data collection technology, and you get the most accurate, efficient, and easy-to-use data collection firm in the country.We work with you to ensure that you get exactly the data you need, data you can rely on,when and where you need it. QC has a well-trained and dedicated team that uses the most advanced Data Collection technology, including BIueMAC Bluetooth MAC readers, GPS Cameras, and Wavetronix radar to collect accurate and dependable numbers that the City of Coral Gables can rely on. QC employs video camera technology to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of our surveying and coverage capabilities.With over 500 HD cameras and 150 personnel companywide, Coral Gables can be sure they will get the footage and data that each project needs. Quality Counts provides the following data collection services: • Turn Movement Counts • Tube Counts • Specialty Surveys • Streetline • BlueMac Streetline represents the latest technology available in parking management and smart city development.Through the deployment of a network of vehicle sensors, and allowing parking to be viewed and managed through mobile apps, by parking users,and by City staff respectively, Streetline reduces the inefficiencies of parking, like time spent searching for a space thus alleviating congestion, emissions,and improving quality of life for residents and visitors alike. Quality Counts has installed the Streetline system across the Eastern Seaboard for a variety of organizations, including corporate campuses, local Cities, Universities, airports,and hospitals. Digiwest BIueMAC readers represent the very latest advances in the world of traffic data collection and monitoring, and BIueMAC is the most comprehensive data collection device and software suite utilizing this technology. Featuring industrial grade hardware and cutting-edge software, no other MAC reader system is as precise or user- friendly as the BIueMAC. By collecting and time-stamping anonymous MAC addresses from passing vehicles and wireless devices and then matching these addresses across a network of devices, BIueMAC is able to provide travel times, average speeds, origin-destination,and more. Data is accessible in real-time through the cloud and rendered into customizable, user-friendly reports by BIueMAC's high-end software. Quality Counts offers both temporary studies and the sale of BIueMAC devices for permanent installations. Glenn Davis, Data Collection Specialist,of Quality Counts has eight years of experience and is the main contact for all of Florida regarding all contracts and projects. He oversees each of the offices' daily operations and works directly with clients. Mr. Davis has managed numerous contracts including aggregate annual tube counts of more than 300 locations. In addition, he has managed several specialized projects where new approaches and dynamic methods were developed in order to complete tasks, specifically using video technology for TMC's and non-intrusive 2017-126-KB 161 IFTab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R radar units for traffic monitoring. Recent projects include the 1-95 Interchange PD&E Study(Broward County Interchanges), 1-95 Interchange PD&E Study(Palm Beach County Interchanges), Quincy Loop Origin-Destination Study for FDOT District 3, Bluetooth Before&After Travel Time Study for Metro Plan Orlando,and the Amtrak Auto Train Data Collection for FDOT District 5. Resumes for the personnel included on the organizational chart follow the 2.2.3 Evidence of Prior Working Experience chart. 2.2.3 EVIDENCE OF PRIOR WORKING EXPERIENCE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR WORKING EXPERIENCE c 0 li 0 O C 0 0 n j, O y ``I' - N i7 n n r N n m 0 c oo 3 ,� a 0 3 0. o c h- u. a J an a o n a 0 0 J H n Q LLJ J_O LL N , N m OC v LL ALL 0 r0'I M tO+f my N 0 E iE L o =v .m c 4-1 _i w E i c •mym, _s ^' ,n O N 4 a O T O LL LL LL LL r `m T LL D •II . -a c d n m 0 c 00 o E i' g g t N Oi u > J > T i:,- ' Q v E r LL n d = E �_ c o c - vl � LNti o ibc LL = = o mo E - u c 17', 0 ,-'o ory fi 0 E . ,,,:.0 : g ', 23 V c ; >. 15 3 oa c R o > c o w H'.= -1 ; o j o m o s o o .e– .25a Opa t=' O 0 2 l„ N O € S N C E C 8 C 3QLL M $ e E 2 " 24'9: Y Pa N § ,n 0 J.$8 0 -0i8 o -,Ca 8 . E m z, m m LL E i tt 3 .. c c,3 'i c g, $s c t c 3 3 o c o s 2 c o ti �N ao � co ao m _ Fo w bo > � S8 6w S8 w..bb m a � i]11 o � o m m i ..8:::-V-.4o Sa '''gi'411 o 0�,31 Vaio11E ;08 , 1 oagE ;a3gEo �a81- Eo3E 1..S E cooI- E ,,,t2iT, 15 Rit5i1: i ;;f 4., :-MTI c tulV .- �i! Lu _ ncowEonioEav Eow ;Loo ' oc ;iEa c : 0cc wco 0oc iEc . E ..a � o � 8 47. 80,18 ao €, do0oo 4aaa Baas baa s Lochner X .. X X X Cambridge Systematics x Bermello Ajamil&Partners Inc. — X IPlusUrbia Design X Fehr&Peers Transportation Consultants X Gridics LLC _ X WIL*a Boothe Transit Consulting,LLC Metric Engineering,Inc. X X ACE Public Relations Group.LLC t— - MAGBE Consulting Services,Inc. Manuel G.Vera&Associates Inc. X Tierra South Florida X — Eland Engineering,Inc. X Walker Parking Consultants X Cloud Parc Ecostata Services,Inc_ Quality Counts X Yea?dla plods rays.ay m 105551 ratatCrSrps al 14015 Isla.,oyar.bral rag - - 2017-126-KB 1 62 ITab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC HN ER RESUMES OF EACH RESPONDENT TEAM MEMBER TO BE ASSIGNED TO THIS CONTRACT Task Leaders H.W. Lochner, Inc. (HWL) ACE Public Relations Group, LLC(ACE) Lochner Support Personnel Bermello Ajamil& Partners, Inc. (BAP) Subconsultant Support Boothe Transit Consulting, LLC(BTC) Personnel Cambridge Systematics (CS) CloudParc (CP) Ecostrata Services, Inc. (ES!) Eland Engineering, Inc. (EEl) Fehr& Peers Transportation Consultants (FPT) Gridics, LLC(GRID) MAGBE Consulting Services, Inc. (MCS) M.G. Vera &Associates, Inc. (MGV) Metric Engineering, Inc. (MEI) PlusUrbia, LLC(Plus) Quality Counts (QC) Tierra South Florida (TSF) Walker Parking Consultants (WPC) WTL+a (WTL) 2017-126-KB 163 RESUME James S inks III PE P 1 James Spinks, III, PE, PTOE Years of Experience: Project Manager/Transportation Planning Task Leader/Traffic 18 Engineering Task Leader Education: James Spinks is a Senior Project Manager who joined the Lochner's Miami office in • Bachelor of Science in Civil 2017 bringing with him 18 years of experience in traffic operations and safety, Engineering, University of transportation planning, signal design,traffic impact analysis and ITS planning. He has Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO 1998 managed projects with Florida's Department of Transportation (FDOT) and has served as a city traffic engineer consultant in more than 20 municipalities including Professional Registration: Broward, Palm Beach, and Miami-Dade counties. His well-rounded experience at • Professional Engineer:TX both, local and state level, gives him the knowledge of how these public institutions #123768 operate and the ability to be a liaison between them.James is recognized in the • Professional Engineer: MO industry by his respectful demeanor, ability to engage in proactive communication, #2009030050 excellence in project management and customer service. • National Council of Examiners for Eng.and Survey: MLST PROJECT EXPERIENCE #38368 SR826/Palmetto Expressway from E of NW 67 Ave to E of NW 57 Ave;Miami-Dade • Professional Engineer: FL County,FL #66775 Owner: FDOT District 6 Traffic Engineer I 2016—2017 Certifications: The Palmetto Expressway Segment 3 project consists of the widening and • Professional Traffic Operations reconstruction of to accommodate four Express Lanes(two in each direction),as well Engineer(PTOE) as auxiliary lanes and a Frontage Road system. In addition,dual left turn lanes(along NW 57 Ave),triple left turn lanes(from the Frontage Roads)and Texas U-turn lanes will be added to improve traffic flow within the interchange. A new bridge over NW 57 Ave will be constructed in order to meet vertical clearance requirements,as well as to provide additional turn lanes and the Texas U-turn lane. Lochner's scope includes maintenance of traffic and preparation of temporary traffic control plans.The MOT will be performed in three major phases,with phase 1 being the new Frontage Roads, phase 2 the EB construction, phase 2 the WB construction.James serves as Traffic Engineer on this project. Reference: Raul Quintela 305.470.5100 PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS FDOT District 4 General Planning Consultant Owner: FDOT District 4 Project Manager I 2011- 2017 On-call services consultant contract.James'assignments included project traffic forecasts(travel demand), FSUTMS model support, DRI review, PD&E review, IMR/IJR review,GIS support,and miscellaneous on-site planning support services. Reference:Chon Wong 954.777.4659 Districtwide Traffic Operations Safety Studies Owner: FDOT District 6 Project Manager I 2014-2017 James provided traffic engineering through the development of various traffic operations and safety studies that will be identified for intersections,arterials,and related improvement recommendations and evaluations.Contract includes five basic types of safety and traffic operations studies such as Qualitative Assessments,Signal Warrant Analysis, Intersection Analysis,Arterial Analysis, Left turn Phase Warrant Analysis, Composite Studies,and other traffic engineering related studies, Fatal Crash Reviews and Speed Zone Studies. Reference: Miguel Caldera 305.470.5335 Pedestrian Study on SW 107th Avenue from Kendall Drive South to SW 9100 Block Owner: FDOT District 6 Project Manager I 2015 James provided traffic engineering services through the development of various pedestrian traffic operations and safety improvements.This location is ranked in the top 15 high crash locations for pedestrian crashes.Study limits were identified by the FDOT Safety Office to identify unique safety solutions for pedestrian crashes. Included data collection for vehicle and LOCHNER 64 RE SUM[ inks III, PE , P IO pedestrians, review of crash data and analysis,field inventory and review,development and evaluation of improvements. Suggested improvements included a detectable pedestrian warning system at the intersection crosswalks,along with a pedestrian activated High-Intensity Activated crossWalK beacon (HAWK) for pedestrians to cross at mid-block location. Reference: Miguel Caldera 305.470.5335 Pedestrian and Bicycle Study on SR MA at 178th Street&SR 826 Owner: FDOT District 6 Project Manager 12014 James provided traffic engineering through the development of various pedestrian and bicycle traffic operations and safety improvements.Study limits were identified by the FDOT Safety Office to identify opportunities for safety improvements for Vulnerable Road Users,with an emphasis on finding unique safety solutions for pedestrian and bicycle users. Reference: Miguel Caldera 305.470.5335 Districtwide Access Management Owner: FDOT District 4 Project Manager I 2014-2017 James provided traffic engineering services through in-house support and various traffic engineering studies. Marlin provides both proactive and reactive support to the District 4 Access Management Unit to include analysis for a varied range of conditions and situations.We prepare for, schedule and conduct meetings typically Pre-Application and Access Management Review Committee(AMRC) meetings with developers,consultants and other governmental agencies. In addition,as part of this contact we prepare Access Management Master Plans, Qualitative Assessments and attend public meetings on behalf of the Department. Reference:Jonathan Overton 954.777.4376 Connecting NW 25th Street to HEFT Study Owner:Miami-Dade County MPO Senior Traffic Engineer 12012 James was responsible for the development of an alternative conceptual plan for a direct connection between NW 25th Street and the HEFT to relieve freight traffic along NW 36th Street and Palmetto Expressway corridors.The study included coordination with Freight Transportation Advisory Committee, Florida Department of Transportation, City of Doral,the Miami-Dade Department of Public Works,and the Florida Turnpike Enterprise.Traffic counts,traffic forecasting and level of service analysis for NW 12th Street, NW 25th Street and NW 36th Street corridors between HEFT and Palmetto Expressway are part of the study. Reference:Jesus Guerra 305.375.2069 Districtwide Public Transportation Consultant Services Owner: FDOT District 6 Project Manager I 2009-2012 James served as overall Project Manager on this on-call consultant contract.This contract assisted the Public Transportation Office (PTO)by providing professional/technical staff to perform support services.Services included multimodal plans and specifications reviews,technical reports/studies reviews, multimodal inspections and reports,project site visits, multimodal inventories,transit systems safety plans reviews, design services,construction engineering& inspection (CEI) services and program administration assistance for Transit,Aviation Rail, Intermodal,and Seaport projects in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. Reference: Dionne Richardson 305.470.5292 Road Safety Audit(RSA)&Safety Studies Owner: Florida Department of Transportation, District 4 Senior Project Manager 1 2011-2012 On-call consultant contract.James' assignments included RSA's,safety studies and net present value driven studies.This contract required FHWA approval of projects and study recommendation presentations to District 4. Reference:Jack Defrant 954.777.4375 LOCHNER 65 • Matthew Ridgway, AICP, PTP, • • ;y Principal • 't 4 i About California APA Project of Merit for MacArthur BART Access Feasibility Plan,2008 Matthew Ridgway has been involved in many of Fehr& Sacramento Area Council of Governments Project of the Year—Sacramento Pedestrian Master Plan,2006 Peers'highest visibility and most complex multi modal ITE Coordinating Council Award for authoring Innovative projects. His key strength is his broad background and Bicycle Treatments,2003 multi modal approach,which he has applied to many ACECT Award for the Nashville-Davidson CountyStrategic bicycle,transit and pedestrian projects.Many of these Plan for Sidewalks and Bikeways(technical projects have involved the development of tools for advisory to RPM&Associates),2002 assessing unique performance measures and design of American Planning Association 2002 Award for innovative transportation facilities. Matthew founded Fehr Outstanding Comprehensive Planning,San &Peers'San Francisco office in 2000 and established Fehr Leandro General Plan &Peers DC in 2015. In addition to his work as a consultant,Matthew is an instructor for the University of California at Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies Publications & Presentations Technology Transfer Program,teaching courses on compete streets,bicycle and pedestrian circulation since Transportation Research Board(TRB),Countywide Planning 1999. He has contributed to a number of national Framework to Identify Continuous and Connected publications. Multimodal Arterial Networks,2017 TRB,A Multimodal Trip Generation Model to Assess Travel Education & Experience Impacts of Urban Developments in DC,2017 TRB, Translating Transportation Measures and Metrics into Health Outcomes,2017 B.A.in Urban Studies,San Francisco State University, 1990 Transportation for America, Planning for a Healthier Future: 25 years of experience,over 20 years with Fehr&Peers Incorporating Health,Equity and Environmental Performance Measure in Regional Transportation Registrations Plans,2016 Caltrans and UC Technology Transfer,Complete Streets (Two-day training),2013 ITE Professional Transportation Planner(80) ITE,Accommodating Bicycles and Pedestrians at American Institute of Certified Planners(011694) Interchanges Recommended Practice,2013 ITE,Planning Urban Roadway Systems Recommended Honors and Awards Practice, author of Layered Network,2012 AASHTO Guide to the Development of Bikeways, Planning ITE Bicycle&Pedestrian Council Best Technical Project- Chapter,2012 Utah Department of Public Health Bicycle and America Walks,Signalized Intersection Enhancements,2012 Pedestrian Master Plan Handbook,2012 ITE, Transportation Planning Handbook,Second Edition, ITE Coordinating Council Outstanding Volunteer,2011 2009 ITE Planning Council and APA Best Practice,2009: Guide University of California,Fundamentals of Traffic for Conducting Pedestrian Safety Assessments in Engineering(16th Edition),2007 California ITE,Informational Report on Bicycle Innovations,2002 1003 K Street NW FEHR �' PEERS'DC DC 20001 Washington,OC 20001 202.854 2750 66 Matthew Ridgway UC Technology Transfer,Planning and Design of Bicycle • University of Utah Pedestrian Plan and Pedestrian Facilities, 1999-2010 • UC Berkeley Bike Plan and Access Plan • UC Santa Barbara Bicycle Plan • UC Davis Bicycle Plan Project Experience • UC San Diego Bicycle Plan • UT Austin Transportation Demand Management Washington DC Metro Experience • CSU Long Beach Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan • Georgetown-Rosslyn Gondola Feasibility Study (used mobile device data for transit accessibility Transit-Oriented Development Studies analysis) • Alameda Point Redevelopment(new ferry • Old Town North Parking Study,Alexandria,VA terminal and service and proposed BART shuttle) (includes use of mobile device data to determine • Candlestick Point/Hunter's Point Redevelopment who is parking on-street) (Geneva BRT,extensive rapid bus improvements) • Purple Line LRT Design-Build-Operate Pedestrian • Brisbane Baylands Plan and EIR(surrounds Assessment, MD Bayshore Caltrain Station,Geneva BRT) • Assessment of metrics/tools in development • Parkmerced Master Plan and EIR(realign Muni M review—Montgomery County(M-NCPPC) rail into site,extensive bus additions/changes) • Mixed use trip generation tool(MXD)considering • Treasure Island Redevelopment EIR(new ferry context, program and parking-District terminal,bus services,congestion pricing) Department of Transportation • UCSF Mission Bay Master Plan(anticipated 4th • Best practice performance measures for health, Street Rail,extensive UCSF-operated shuttles) equity and environment in Regional Transportation Plans-Transportation for America Bicycle and Pedestrians Plans • • Active Transportation Plan for a host of cities Multi-Modal Planning Studies including Albany, Denver,El Cerrito, Emeryville, Downtown Dallas Transportation Plan (used Fremont, Newark,Oakland,Pleasanton, • mobile device data to validate NCTCOG model) Reno/Sparks,Richmond,Sacramento,San • Alameda Countywide Multimodal Arterial Plan Francisco,San Jose,San Leandro,Walnut Creek (includes use of INRIX speed data) • Regional bicycle and pedestrian plans for the • Oakland-Alameda Water Shuttle Feasibility Metropolitan Transportation Commission, • San Pablo Avenue Complete Streets, El Cerrito Alameda County Transportation Commission, • Geneva Avenue BRT,San Francisco Contra Costa Transportation Authority, • 19th Avenue M-Line("Tier 5"),San Francisco Sacramento County,Davidson County(Nashville, • Balboa PARK BART Access Plan,San Francisco TN) • Sugarhouse Streetcar and Trails Alternatives • Developed the California Pedestrian and Bicycle Analysis—Salt Lake City,UT Safety Assessment Programs and administered to • Union Square/Patsaouras Plaza, Los Angeles dozens of jurisdictions including Fresno,Oakland, • BART Bike Plan,SF Bay Area Long Beach, Los Angeles, Palo Alto,Sacramento, • Eastern Neighborhoods Plan,San Francisco San Diego,San Francisco,San Jose • East LA(Gold Line)Access Plan, Los Angeles • First/Last Mile Plans for BART,Caltrain, LA Metro, • MacArthur BART Access Feasibility Plan—Oakland San Francisco Muni • AC Transit Bike Access to Transit Study,Oakland • Bicycle Boulevard planning and design for • Redmond Concurrency, Redmond,WA Oakland, Palo Alto,San Diego • SF Transbay Terminal and Temp Terminal Design Bike share feasibility or business plans for • MTC Safe Routes to Transit Prog Eval,SF Bay Area Monterey,Sacramento,San Francisco Bay Area (Motivate),and Santa Monica University Studies • UC San Francisco Long-Range Development Plan and Mission Bay Master Plan 1003 K Street NW Suite 209 FEH R PEERS DC Washington,OC 20001 202.854.2750 67 orte, Gerard Walters AkkPrincipal/Chief Technical Officer v.r. About "Mixed-use Development and Vehicle Trips:Improving the Standard Estimation Methodology"He is a co-author of the Jerry Walters is Fehr&Peers'Chief Technical Officer and 2008 book"Growing Cooler—the Evidence on Urban leader of the firm's Sustainability Practices,integrating Development and Climate Change,"published by the transportation planning with sustainable climate,energy Urban Land Institute. and quality of life. He has over thirty years'experience in transportation planning,engineering and travel Education forecasting. Jerry has served on Regional Targets Advisory Committee to the Air Resources Board on implementing Master of Engineering in Transportation Engineering, California's landmark transportation/land use and climate Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1974 law SB 375,and the American Public Transit Association Bachelor of Science in Engineering Science, Rensselaer (APTA)working group on national guidelines for Polytechnic Institute, 1971 estimating climate change impacts of transit,advisory committee for Caltrans' 'Assessment of Local Models and Affiliations Tools for Analyzing Smart-Growth Strategies,"and on the • Califomia Department of Housing and Community Development assessment"The Effect of Housing Near Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Transit Stations on Vehicle Trip Rotes and Transit Trip Congress for the New Urbanism(CNU) • Generation",the Southern Califomia Association of Governments review panel on the regional economic Registrations impacts of State climate legislation,and on the California Transportation Commission working group on travel Licensed Traffic Engineer,State of California(#1467) modeling guidelines for Regional Transportation Plans under law A632. Selected Publications & Presentations Jerry also led development and review of sustainability analysis methods for the Oregon Department of Presentations on Sustainability, Land Use and Transportation and Department of Land Conservation and Transportation Planning for:Transportation Research Development,the Sacramento Regional Blueprint study, Board(TRB),American Planning Association(APA), San Joaquin Valley Growth Response study,and smart Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),Association of growth planning for the San Diego and San Luis Obispo Environmental Professionals(NAEP),New Partners for regions. He directed tasks on evaluation methods and Smart Growth, National Governors'Association,Urban performance measures for the Transportation Research Land Institute(ULI),California Transportation Planning Board Strategic Highway Research Program(SHRP 2)C16 Conference, Local Governments Commission, Rail program on The Effect of Smart Growth Policies on Travel Volution,California Air Pollution Control Officers Demand.Jerry has also developed project evaluation Association(CAPCOA),San Francisco Planning and Urban methods and metrics for the US EPA Smart Growth INDEX Research Association,Silicon Valley Network,San Joaquin and is project manager for the on-going US EPA study Valley Futures Forum,San Ramon Valley Leadership,and F E H R P E E R S 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 600 Walnut Creek I Denver I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Walnut Creek,CA 94596 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San José I Seattle I Washington,DC 925.930.7100 68 Gerard Walters Principal/Chief Technical Officer others. Reviewer for 2011 book by the Center for Clean Air planning guidelines and a planning and evaluation toolkit Policy(CCAP):Growing Wealthier,Smart Growth,Climate for MPOs. Change and Prosperity. Member of advisory committee on 2007 Caltrans report on Author or co-author of: Assessment of Local Models and Tools for Analyzing Smart Growing Cooler—The Evidence on Urban Development and Growth Strategies. Presenter at Caltrans/FHWA 2008 Climate Change,Urban Land Institute,2008. California Transportation Planning Conference on Measuring the Benefits of Compact Development on Vehicle Overview of Models&Tools for Land Use and Miles and Climate Change, National Association of Transportation Planning,and at California Air Resources Environmental Professionals,2009 Board 2008 Symposium on The Role of Land Use and Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments—A Six- Transportation in Meeting Climate Change Program Goals. Region Study Using Consistent Built Environmental Principal-in-charge and advisory panel member on Measures,Journal of Urban Planning and Development, methodologies for California Department of Housing and American Society of Civil Engineers,2011 Community Development evaluation of TOD development Smort Mobility Framework,California Department of applications for Proposition 1C bond measure incentives Transportation,2010 for trip-reducing development proposals; Principal-in- Making Traffic Models Sensitive to Smart Growth Charge of SANDAG San Diego region Smart Growth Trip Characteristics,Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE), Generation and Parking Generation Study.Directed 2006 international sustainable planning studies in Singapore Comparing Methodologies for Estimating Trip and China.Member of American Public Transit Association Internalization of Mixed-Use Development,Transportation, working group on climate change credits and standards. Research Board,2007 Mixing It Up--How Successful Mixed-Use Development can Integrated Land Use/Transportation Planning Reduce Transportation Impacts on Roadways, Vehicle Project manager on a national study of travel generation Emissions,and Energy Use, Urban Land, Urban Land characteristics of mixed-use development projects for the Institute,2008 US EPA and Institute of Transportation Engineers. Growing Smartly Around an Existing LRT Line: A Case Developed performance measures for transportation Study,Transportation Research Board,2007 planning and design decisions for the California Department of Transportation as key element of the Project Experience Caltrans Smart Mobility Framework and Handbook. Managing statewide studies in California on integrated Sustainability and Climate Change planning tools for land use and transportation on the Member of California Transportation Commission working effects of the state's High Speed Rail system and land use, group on implementation procedures for California AB32 transportation,climate change and other environmental impacts. Principal-in-Charge of a Statewide Caltrans study climate change initiative. Co-author of ULI and Smart developing integrated quick-response land use and Growth America 2008 book: Growing Cooler—Evidence transportation planning tools for MPOs. Principal-in- on Urban Development and Climate Change. Co-author Charge of an eight-MPO transportation model on sustainable transportation performance measures for improvements plan under a grant from the California Caltrans Smart Mobility Framework handbook.Developed Strategic Growth Council.Led development of smart protocols for California Air Pollution Control Officers growth travel forecasting methods for Sacramento Association(CAPCOA)and California Energy Commission Regional Blueprint study.Principal investigator on to assess the climate and air quality effects of a establishing new procedures and tools for evaluating comprehensive list of transportation demand management wide-scale growth impacts in San Joaquin Valley Growth (TDM)measures and other Best Management Practices Response study.Led transportation assessment for (BMP). Assisting the Oregon Departments of countywide Smart Growth planning in Contra Costa Transportation and Land Conservation and Development, County and in San Luis Obispo County,California.Senior prepare a Statewide Sustainable Transportation Strategy advisor and director of transportation elements for under State law S61059 and development of scenario Minneapolis/St.Paul Metropolitan Region Smart Growth FE H R '' P E E R S 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 600 Walnut Creek I Denver I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Walnut Creek,CA 94596 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San José I Seattle I Washington,DC 925.930.7100 fig Gerard Walters Principal/Chief Technical Officer Study and Atlanta Regional Cores and Corridors Study. Served as advisor to FHWA and Utah DOT in preparation Developed innovative"5D"modeling tools for the of Supplemental EIS on Legacy Parkway,including Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)and regional examination of potential benefits of optimal integration of planning organizations to evaluate transportation effects transit and highway projects in the corridor and re- of different growth policies.Performed comparative evaluation of project purpose and need,alternatives and evaluation of infill site design concepts and infill transportation impacts.Directed numerous multi- /greenfield comparisons for Atlanta's landmark Atlantic jurisdictional transportation planning studies,such as the Station project and major master-planned communities in 15 jurisdiction I-5 Corridor Transportation Strategic Plan South Carolina,Utah and California. and the five-county Foothill/Valley Intermodal Transportation Study.Managed highway planning,design Travel Models and Demand Forecasting and operations studies for the I-680 high-occupancy- Directed development of direct demand ridership vehicle lanes and numerous interchanges and corridor forecasting models for concept screening,alternatives studies. analysis and transit access and TOD planning for rapid rail (BART),commuter rail(Caltrain),and light rail transit Traditional Neighborhood Design, Livable Streets systems in Denver,Sacramento,Salt Lake City,San Diego Led transportation planning and conceptual design for and Portland.Performed long-range travel demand Caltrans demonstration project on Context Sensitive Street forecasting,using sophisticated models for cities such as Design on a segment of urban State highway,and for Caracas,Venezuela;San Juan,Puerto Rico; Edmonton, award-winning Palm Drive redesign and the Campus Drive Canada;Washington,D.C.; Los Angeles,California;and and Sand Hill Road corridor street improvements at other major metropolitan regions. Developed techniques Stanford University.Study Advisor on Santa Clara Valley to enhance or substitute for conventional 4-step models Transportation Authority Best Development Practices for prediction of travel-reducing effects of Smart Growth study and development of multimodal transportation Level principles of density,diversity,design and regional of Service standards.Principal-in-Charge for Aurora, accessibility. Directed modeling applications in the Colorado street standards for urban centers and transit Atlanta, Minneapolis/St.Paul,San Diego,San Francisco oriented development. and Sacramento regions. University Transportation Plans Transit and Station-Area Planning Directed transportation planning studies,impact analyses, Directed station site screening and transportation impact and development of multimodal systems and strategies for assessment for prospective stations in seven cities along University communities including: Stanford University California's planned High Speed Rail system. Directed Community Plan and General Use Permit, Long Range ridership forecasting for BART system-wide access study Development Plans for University of California at Riverside, and regional travel demand management study,and for the new University of California at Merced,and City proposed transit extensions including DMU train and bus College of San Francisco. rapid transit alternatives Developed direct ridership models to forecast station-by-station rail ridership growth on new rapid rail,commuter rail and light rail. Advised on prospective streetcar improvements plans in Salt Lake City, Albuquerque,Oakland and Austin, Developed ridership criteria and effectiveness for SF Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)policies for rail and ferry Transit Oriented Development(TOD).Performed bus and rail system alternatives analysis for transit corridors in Caracas,Venezuela;San Juan, Puerto Rico;and California Participated in transit station area planning for intermodal terminals in California;Washington D.C., Utah and Nevada. Highway Planning and Traffic Operations FE H R '' P E E R S 100 Pringle Avenue Suite 600 Walnut Creek I Denver I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Walnut Creek,CA 94596 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San lose I Seattle I Washington,DC 925.930.7100 70 RESUME I Bill Howell, PE Bill Howell, PE Years of Experience: 36 Complete Streets Task Leader Bill Howell is a Senior Transportation Engineer and Planner in Lochner's Tampa Eduestfon: office. He has been with Lochner since 1994,with 13 years'prior experience in • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering transportation engineering.He currently focuses on project development and (Structural Emphasis),University of environment(PD&E)and planning studies. South Florida 1985 • Bachelor of Arts in Business Mr.Howell has conducted and managed PD&E studies for dozens of state-level and Administration,University of South local transportation improvement projects,often involving complex socioeconomic, Florida 1976 environmental,cultural,and historical issues. He has considerable experience Professional working within the NEPA framework and has overseen the preparation of • Professional Engineer:FL#37284 categorical exclusions,environmental assessments,environmental impact statements,and state environmental impact reports.He is extremely familiar with Affiliations: Section 4(f)and Section 106 procedures. Mr. Howell also has notable expertise in • American Society of Civil Engineers long-range planning,corridor studies,alternatives development and analysis,and conceptual design.He has had particular experience in assessing the socioeconomic Recognitions: impacts of bypasses on rural communities. • 2015 FHWA Environmental Excellence Award-Cultural Resources Mr.Howell has coordinated many public involvement programs and liaised with • 2014 FICE/FDOT Outstanding Project state and federal agencies,advisory committees,and local interest groups. He is of the Year-Special Projects committed to making such programs as accessible to stakeholders as possible,often Areas of Expertise: conducting online meetings with agencies and the local community.In a number of • Environmental Impact Statements projects,he has been instrumental in providing multilingual public involvement • Alternative Development and Analysis programs to meet community demographics. • Program Management • Quality Control and Assurance PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Publiclnvolvement • Project Management US 41 Roundabouts PD&E Study;Sarasota,FL • Data Collection Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 1 • Structural Inventory Project Manager I 2010-2013 • NEPA Documentation Project development and environment(PD&E)study to evaluate the replacement of • Public Meeting Coordination two US 41 intersections(10th Street and 14th Street)with roundabouts. • Environmental Assessments Completion of Section 106 and Section 4(f)evaluations.Assessment of sustainable • Design Exception Request/Approval and context-sensitive design features, including the improvement of transit,bicycle, • Corridor Studies and pedestrian facilities.Creation of traffic microsimulation models and 3-D drive- • Proposal Development through animation for use in the public involvement process.This study served as a • Project Development and Environment demonstration project for future roundabout development within the city. (PD&E)Studies • Section 4(f)Evaluation Responsible for: • Existing Conditions Analysis • Providing project management,including coordination with client; . Categorical Exclusion Documentation coordination with agencies and local governments;attending progress • Feasibility Studies meetings;preparing progress reports and invoices;preparing and • Structural Inspection maintaining project schedule, monitoring scope of services and preparing • Public and Media Outreach Material supplemental agreements,preparing and tracking budget,developing Development project filing system and monitoring conformance,preparing project management and quality control plans,providing quality control and quality assurance reviews,and reviewing internal project financial reports. • Overseeing development and implementation of Public Involvement Plan;serving as main presenter for public meetings;overseeing preparation of public meeting materials,handouts, newsletters,mailings,notices and advertisements and presentations;preparing responses to public comments; reviewing meeting site selection and facilities;conducting neighborhood and stakeholder meetings;and overseeing documentation of public involvement effort. • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports, maps, plans,exhibits, correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives; leading and LOCHNER 71 RE 'AIM! lull II�>w-'ll, E'f overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents;reviewing and directing all work produced by staff and subconsultants. 66th Street PDE Study;Pinellas County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2010-2011 Project development and environment(PD&E)study, involving a non-major state action(NMSA)environmental evaluation, for extensive operational improvements on 0.55 miles of SR 693(66th Street North) in Pinellas County,Florida.The improvements involve the addition of a 12-foot-wide southbound lane along the inside median to tie the existing five-lane divided roadway section into the six-lane divided section located directly south of the project limits.Responsible for: • Providing project management,including coordination with client;coordination with agencies and local governments;attending progress meetings;preparing progress reports and invoices; preparing and maintaining project schedule,monitoring scope of services and preparing supplemental agreements,preparing and tracking budget,developing project filing system and monitoring conformance,preparing project management and quality control plans,providing quality control and quality assurance reviews, and reviewing internal project financial reports. • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports,maps,plans,exhibits, correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives; leading and overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents;reviewing and directing all work produced by staff and subconsultants. US 41 Roundabouts Final Design;Sarasota,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 1 Project Engineer I 2013-2020 Design of two roundabouts with landscaped centers and pedestrian signals to replace two signalized intersections. Design of bicycle lanes,curb and gutter,lighting,and ITS/ATMS facilities. Development of construction staging plan to minimize disruption to traffic and pedestrians in a busy urban setting.Responsible for: • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports, maps,plans,exhibits, correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives; leading and overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents;reviewing and directing work produced by staff and subconsultants. 15th Street East/301 Boulevard East PD&E Study;Manatee County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 1 Project Manager I 2013 -2017 PD&E study for the widening of 4.5 miles of 15th Street East/301 Boulevard East from two to three lanes,and the construction of associated Complete Streets elements,such as bicycle lanes,sidewalks,pedestrian crossings,street lighting, and roundabouts,as well as transit improvements.Impacts to a historic district,historic cemetery,and creek are key concerns,as are potential contamination issues from petroleum and hazardous waste sites. Responsible for: • Providing project management,including coordination with client;coordination with agencies and local governments;attending progress meetings;preparing progress reports and invoices;preparing and maintaining project schedule,monitoring scope of services and preparing supplemental agreements,preparing and tracking budget,developing project filing system and monitoring conformance,preparing project management and quality control plans,providing quality control and quality assurance reviews,and reviewing internal project financial reports. • Overseeing development and implementation of Public Involvement Plan;serving as main presenter for public meetings;overseeing preparation of public meeting materials, handouts,newsletters,mailings,notices and advertisements and presentations;preparing responses to public comments; reviewing meeting site selection and facilities;conducting neighborhood and stakeholder meetings;and overseeing documentation of public involvement effort. • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports,maps,plans,exhibits, correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing LOCHNER 72 F;FSi;�1F Bill lO'. 'il, Pi. 3 and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives; leading and overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents; reviewing and directing all work produced by staff and subconsultants. Jefferson Street at Ponce De Leon Intersection Study;Brooksville,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2013-2015 Intersection study to recommend the improvements needed to provide adequate level of service through design year 2040. The intersection currently sees moderate to heavy traffic on all legs during peak travel periods and significant traffic queues on the north leg and has inadequate corner radii to accommodate the turning movements of the large number of tractor- trailers that pass through the facility.Lochner will evaluate a number of design alternatives,including conventional intersection improvements(e.g.,additional turn lanes,traffic signal modifications,and enhanced pavement markings)as well as the replacement of the traditional intersection with a roundabout.Responsible for: • Providing project management,including coordination with client;coordination with agencies and local governments;attending progress meetings;preparing progress reports and invoices;preparing and maintaining project schedule,monitoring scope of services and preparing supplemental agreements,preparing and tracking budget,developing project filing system and monitoring conformance,preparing project management and quality control plans,providing quality control and quality assurance reviews,and reviewing internal project financial reports. • Overseeing development and implementation of Public Involvement Plan;serving as main presenter for public meetings;overseeing preparation of public meeting materials, handouts,newsletters, mailings,notices and advertisements and presentations;preparing responses to public comments; reviewing meeting site selection and facilities;conducting neighborhood and stakeholder meetings;and overseeing documentation of public involvement effort. • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports,maps,plans,exhibits, correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives; leading and overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents;reviewing and directing all work produced by staff and subconsultants. US 41 at Main Street PD and E Study;Sarasota,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 1 Project Manager I 2015-2018 PD&E study for the conversion of an existing intersection into a two-lane roundabout.The project is located in an environmentally sensitive area,with parkland on all four corners of the intersection.The roundabout would form a gateway into a city park and marina. Impacts on Section 4(f)areas,historic and cultural resources,noise,and protected species habitat will be key elements of the study,as will the use of context-sensitive design solutions and the accommodation of pedestrians and cyclists. Responsible for: • Providing project management,including coordination with client,attending progress meetings,preparing progress reports and invoices,preparing and maintaining project schedule, monitoring scope of services and preparing supplemental agreements,preparing and tracking budget,developing project filing system and monitoring conformance,preparing project management and quality control plans,providing quality control and quality assurance reviews,and reviewing internal project financial reports,and assigning tasks and oversees production. • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports,maps,correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;leading and overseeing ctevelopment of bridge inspection procedures and report guidelines;approving equipment purchases and direct expenses;implementing and monitoring training program for bridge inspectors;monitoring operations for safety and OSHA compliance; overseeing and reviewing bridge inspection reports and related documents; reviewing and directing all work produced by staff and subconsultants. US 19,70th Avenue to 118th Avenue PD&E Study;Pinellas Park,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Supervisor(Task Mgr.) I 2016-2017 Reevaluation of a previous PD&E study—including new conceptual designs,cost estimates,environmental studies,and public involvement initiatives—for improvements to a 3.6-mile stretch of US 19 and the US 19/Gandy Boulevard interchange. LOCHNER 73 Rf 'A IMF loll I lcv.,t,II, Pi Responsible for:Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports, maps,plans, exhibits,correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives;leading and overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents; reviewing and directing work produced by staff and subconsultants. Alt US 19-SR 595 Corridor Study II from Belleair Rd to Pinellas-Pasco County Line;Pinellas,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Principal-in-Charge I 2016-2018 Lochner is conducting a study analysis of travel related problems,needs and issues along the SR 595/Alt 19 corridor from Belleair Rd to the Pinellas/Pasco County line for FDOT District 7.This project involves a corridor study(pre-PD&E)to evaluate the need for multimodal transportation improvement along a congested regional transportation corridor.Lochner is tasked with identifying the cause and characteristics of the corridor's transportation issues.This may include capacity issues,traffic operations,safety,access and egress,freight movements,transit, bicycles,and pedestrian movements.Lochner is also tasked with identifying both current US 19 corridor travel conditions and needs and forecasted travel characteristics and needs while also developing potential workable and implementable solutions for travel needs.Testing of alternatives for potential improvements may also be involved. Responsible for: US 41 at Ringling Blvd PDE Study;Sarasota,FL Client:AIM Engineering&Surveying,Inc. Project Manager I 2016-2017 Responsible for: • Providing project management,including coordination with client;coordination with agencies and local governments;attending progress meetings;preparing progress reports and invoices;preparing and maintaining project schedule,monitoring scope of services and preparing supplemental agreements,preparing and tracking budget,developing project filing system and monitoring conformance,preparing project management and quality control plans,providing quality control and quality assurance reviews,and reviewing internal project financial reports. • Overseeing development and implementation of Public Involvement Plan;serving as main presenter for public meetings;overseeing preparation of public meeting materials,handouts, newsletters,mailings,notices and advertisements and presentations;preparing responses to public comments; reviewing meeting site selection and facilities;conducting neighborhood and stakeholder meetings;and overseeing documentation of public involvement effort. • Assigning project-related tasks to production staff and overseeing production of reports,maps,plans,exhibits, correspondence and other project-related materials and deliverables;overseeing data collection efforts;assessing and evaluating environmental impacts;developing,comparing and evaluating different alternatives;leading and overseeing development of engineering criteria and concepts;overseeing,participating and reviewing project engineering and environmental documents; reviewing and directing all work produced by staff and subconsultants. LOCHNER 74 www.camsys.com KAREN KISELEWSKI, AICP Senior Associate Cambridge Systematics, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Karen Kiselewski,AICP, is Senior Associate of Cambridge M.U.R.P., Urban Planning, Systematics with 15 years experience in multimodal trans- Florida Atlantic University, 2001 portation planning for active transportation and transit; policy and program development and evaluation; integrating M.S., Computer Science, Ohio State transportation planning and land use, economic, and other University, 1986 systems planning; and coordination, facilitation and public M.S., Mathematics, Ohio State engagement. She has performed corridor and areawide University, 1985 planning studies for the Florida DOT (FDOT), metropolitan planning organizations, and municipalities. B.S., Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, 1982 Florida DOT Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) and Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Policy Plan. Ms. Kiselewski served as analyst in the development of the AREAS OF EXPERTISE 2015 FTP and SIS Policy Plan. Her major role was supporting statewide partner and public engagement, Integrated Transportation and Land including development of outreach materials and tracking Use Planning activities. She also served as staff lead for the Quality of Life Multimodal Transportation Planning and Quality Places advisory committee, providing Public and Interagency Coordination background information on trends such as public health and Outreach (e.g., obesity and food deserts), travel behavior, Policy and Program Analysis/ demographics (e.g., aging population), energy and Evaluation environment, safety and security (e.g., fatalities and human trafficking), and emergency preparedness and response. Staff drafted policy language and emphasis areas for the PROFESSIONAL advisory committee, which provided recommendations to REGISTRATIONS the steering committee. Florida DOT District 4 Florida Transportation Plan (FTP) American Institute of Certified and Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Policy Plan. Planners, 2005, #019557 Ms. Kiselewski provided regional outreach support in the development of the 2015 FTP and SIS Policy Plan. Her major role was in contacting and engaging traditional and PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS non-traditional partners. This included arranging topic specific workshops, using a variety of techniques to obtain American Planning Association (APA), input, on transportation and community health (medical and Regional and Intergovernmental community service providers) and children and family Coordination Division services providers. WTS, SFWTS Board member City of Kissimmee General Planning Services. For the City of Kissimmee (FL), Cambridge Systematics is providing general planning services on a task work order basis and Ms. Kiselewski serves as project manager. Areas to be covered include: special studies, such as demographic CAMBRIDGE 75 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com KAREN KISELEWSKI (continued) analysis, scenario planning, or comprehensive plan updates; GIS, tools, and visualization; market analysis; and public engagement/consensus building. A current task is an existing conditions assessment of development patterns, transportation, housing, infrastructure, and other services, as well as estimates of future needs based on population projections. CS prepared a public survey outreach process to determine major issues to be addressed, which include economic development, transportation choices, family homelessness, and recreational and cultural opportunities. Next steps will recommend comprehensive plan policy modifications to address the major issues and other statutory and community needs. Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization Gandy Boulevard Adaptation Study. The Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) participated in a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Pilot Project that identified assets potentially subject to inundation due to flooding, sea level rise, and storm surge. A subsequent phase of the pilot identified five critical assets for additional study. One such important asset is a link between Hillsborough and Pinellas counties where Gandy Boulevard makes landfall, continuing east to the site of a planned elevated connector. The Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority (THEA) developed a proposal to design/construct the elevated connector and was interested in including adaptation strategies. The purpose of this project was to refine three proposed adaptation strategies for the elevated section of the expressway extension at Gandy Boulevard, provide conceptual designs for implementation, and outline more specific costs estimates to assist in the determination and prioritization of elements for inclusion in the THEA project. Ms. Kiselewski served as project manager leading a multidisciplinary team. FDOT District 4 and District 6 Storm Surge and Transportation Network Disruption. Ms. Kiselewski served as Project Manager to build upon the recent Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Climate Resilience and Adaptation Pilot Project for Southeast Florida by identifying transportation network implications related to storm surge and sea level rise in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties. The project used storm surge scenarios based on historic storm tracks to identify network disruption and associated economic impacts. A multi-agency coordination team provided technical guidance. Ms. Kiselewski continues to provide resiliency support to the District through tasks such as establishing a GIS inventory for transportation infrastructure studies in south Florida, high-resolution mapping pilot location identification and agency coordination, and potential risk evaluations of future projects. Palm Tran's Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update for 2017-2026 Ms. Kiselewski served project manager as part of a team that completed the first phase of the TDP Major Update under a Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization contract. Tasks included collection and analysis of demographic and performance-related data, such as transportation and land use conditions, ridership, and socioeconomic factors; and stakeholder engagement including targeted interviews of elected and community officials, preparation and analysis of a transit agency employee attitudinal survey, and a roundtable workshop for the transit agency service board, officials, and the public. FDOT District 4 Local Government Technical Assistance and Metropolitan and Regional Planning Support. Prior to joining Cambridge Systematics, Ms. Kiselewski, as Project Manager, supported the Office of Modal Development in the formation of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) working group of metropolitan planning organizations, transit agencies, regional planning councils, local governments, universities, organizations, and private interests working toward the creation of TOD in the region. BP2017.0096.900 CAMBRIDGE 76 SYSTEMATICS WTL +a W. Thomas Lavash, Managing Principal Years of Experience: Current Firm-7 Years; Overall-32 Years Education: Master of City Planning, University of Pennsylvania with Certificate in Real Estate Development, Wharton School of Business (1983); Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies, cum laude, University of Massachusetts (1980) Professional References: See Attached Professional Memberships: Urban Land Institute (ULI); ULI District Council, Washington, D.C. Relevant Experience & Qualifications: See Attached Professional Licenses: N/A DBE Status: N/A WTL+a, a small business created in 2009 and based in Washington, D.C., brings 32 years of experience in real estate and economic development consulting on behalf of public and private clients, including municipal and state governments, institutions, investment funds and developers on 450 projects across the United States. The firm conducts market, financial feasibility, tax increment (TIF), and economic/fiscal impact studies for revitalization and redevelopment projects, focused on small area plans, downtown/urban mixed-use, waterfront, suburban corridor commercial districts, neighborhoods, and transit-oriented development (TOD) projects. The firm has significant experience throughout Florida: • Completing over 150 projects for both public and private clients in real estate market and financial feasibility analyses, CRA redevelopment plans, tax increment revenue forecasts and economic and fiscal impact studies; • Providing real estate and economic development advisory services for multiple municipalities, counties and MPOs; FDOT Districts 1, 4 and 6; South Florida Regional Transit Authority; Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council; Central Florida Regional Planning Council; Miami-Dade Expressway Authority; and many others; WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC—Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 77 WTL +a • Conducting more than 50 CRA projects across the state, including Findings of Necessity, CRA master plans, and TIF revenue studies. CRAs include: Boynton Beach, Daytona Beach, Delray Beach, Dunedin, Gulf Breeze, Hallandale Beach, Ft. Lauderdale, Ft. Myers, Ft. Pierce, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Jupiter, Lakeland, Lake Worth, Miami, Miami Springs, North Miami Beach, Ocala, Orlando, Riviera Beach, Sarasota, Stuart, St. Petersburg, Tampa, West Palm Beach; • Preparing economic development strategies as part of corridor transit plans; economic impacts of transit alternatives; and evaluating TOD development potentials focused on real estate market potentials, economic viability, station area planning, and value capture/funding strategies for development surrounding rail stations. Completed TOD feasibility studies and economic/financial analyses for 96 potential station locations along the proposed SFECC (Coastal Link) rail line in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties; and • Evaluating joint development opportunities associated with the Miami Intermodal Center (MIC), a 1.4 million sq. ft. intermodal transit center, since 1994. WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors 4235 South Dakota, NE Washington, DC 20017 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 78 RESUME I Andrea Ostrodka,AICP, LEED AP • Andrea Ostrodka, AICP, LEED AP Years of Experience: 13 Transit Planning Task Leader/Transportation Planning Andrea Ostrodka is a Senior Project Manager in Lochner's Southeast Region.She Education: joined the firm in 2016 and brings over 13 years of diverse experience in the • Bachelor of Arts in management of complex and high-profile planning and zoning contracts with History/Environmental Studies,Emory particular experience in addressing growing areas in Florida.Before joining Lochner University,Atlanta,GA 2001 she served as both Director of Planning and Development and Manager of Strategic • Masters of Urban Planning in Urban Planning for LYNX in Orlando where she oversaw their daily planning operations and and Regional Planning,University of coordination with over 30 local municipalities.She has diverse public and private- North Carolina,Chapel Hill,NC 2003 sector experience in comprehensive planning,community design,transit systems Certifications: planning,project and team management with a focus in transportation,sustainable • AICP design,strategic planning,zoning,land development regulations,policy,code- • LEEP AP writing,and public relations.As Director of LYNX's Planning and Development Department she oversaw the daily operations of a 25-person staff and was Areas of Expertise: responsible cultivating and maintaining strategic partnerships with local • Feasibility Studies governments and stakeholders to advance their transportation goals.As Manager • Management Consulting of Strategic Planning she managed the service integration of the LYNX-SunRail • Light Rail Transit Planning/Design Phase I program including 26 feeder routes,a bus bridge Standard Operating • Media Relations Procedure(SOP),and regular coordination with FDOT. • FTA Analysis/Study Documentation • Alternative Development and Analysis • Local Municipality Coordination PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Land Use Planning Tampa Bay Premium Transit Feasibility Study;Hillsborough County,FL • Project Management Client:Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. • Program Management Supervisor(Task Mgr.) I 2016-2018 • Public Meeting Coordination Responsible for: • Environmental Planning • Performing research/analysis regarding quantification methodologies for • Public Involvement economic impact of premium transit systems • Transit Station Planning/Design • Inter-Agency Coordination • PREVIOUS'EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Public and Media Outreach Material Development Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority(LYNX),Orlando,FL • Long Range Planning Director Planning&Development • Transportation Planning May 2014—August 2016 • High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV)Facility • Direct day-to-day operations of a 25-person department including Planning/Design functional areas of strategic planning,engineering,construction, routes • NEPA Documentation and schedules,intelligent transportation systems(ITS),and grants • Railway Track Planning/Design • Cultivate and maintain strategic partnerships with local governments, • Grant Writing institutions,and private enterprise to advance the community's • Grant Administration • Transit Planning/Design transportation objectives • Stakeholder Facilitation • Represent LYNX on SunRail Technical Advisory Committee, MetroPlan • Business Planning Orlando Technical Advisory Committee • Facilitate cross-agency partnerships with FDOT,MetroPlan Orlando,and Central Florida Expressway Authority to advance transportation projects of regional significance • • Establish and monitor performance metrics and best practices for transit operations • Assess operational and financial impact of 1-4 rebuild project(ongoing) Manager of Strategic Planning June 2011—May 2014 • Managed LYNX-SunRail Phase 1 service integration,including 26 feeder routes,a bus bridge standard operating procedure,and regular coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation • Lead administrator for$32M American Recovery and Reinvestment Act(ARRA)grant including 19 projects ranging from facility construction to amenity planning and installation,to real time information to surveillance and security. Responsible for regular federal reporting and coordination with the Federal Transit Administration(FTA) • Managed Comprehensive Operational Analysis to assess costs and improve operational efficiency of transit operations across three-county service area LOCHNER 79 RESUME I Andrea Ostrodka,AICP,LEED AP 2 • Facilitated the development of the agency's Strategic Plan and manages ongoing implementation efforts across 11 departments(Operations, Planning,Government Affairs, Engineering&Construction,Finance,Procurement,HR, Risk&Safety, Paratransit,Communications&Marketing,and Executive) • Project manager and technical planner for major update to the Transit Development Plan(2013-2022) • Project manager for US 192 and SR 50 Alternatives Analyses(AA)and other transit planning studies AECOM Technical Services,Orlando,FL Senior Team Leader,Urban Planner, December 2009—March 2011 • Managed planning,transportation and environmental services for large-scale development projects in Florida • Managed design studio professional staff including Transportation Engineering,GIS,Planning,Urban Design and Graphics • Prepared proposals,project scopes of work,and detailed budgets for planning and transportation design services • Responsible for business development,visibility,and client management • Developed monitoring programs to measure effectiveness of strategy implementation • Knowledge of transportation and land use planning and funding processes,including NEPA and New Starts,the metropolitan planning process,cutting edge ideas, industry best practices and current regulations GlattingJackson Kercher Anglin,Orlando,FL Senior Project Manager October 2003—December 2009 • Strategic Advisor for local governments,large landClients,and developers • Managed multi-disciplinary teams(planning,engineering,transportation,environmental,utilities and landscape design services)for design projects with contracts ranging from$35,000-$2 Million • Developed and amended comprehensive plans,sustainability plans,transit plans and urban design standards • Assisted local governments in securing grant funding and complying with state and federal programs • Performed data collection,analysis and report preparation for demographic,transportation and statistical information • Developed and delivered presentations and educational materials to clients, public agencies and internal staff • Accountable for budgets,schedules,and execution of project strategies • Negotiated and secured project permits and approvals with local and state agencies Triangle Land Conservancy,Raleigh,NC Environmental Planner September 2001—May 2003 • Community projects liaison with Triangle J Council of Governments • Author and lead researcher for biennial State of Open Space report Urban Land Institute Central Florida Chapter Chair of Programs 2007—2010 • Reviewer,The Transportation/Land Use Intersection white paper • Determine programming agenda for successive 12-month cycles for 1,000 member local chapter. Highlights include Integrating Rail in Central Florida Forum(April,2010)and TOD and Central Florida's Future(September 2010) LOCHNER 80 =9" ffLdii Ili ; a! !i ► lill; ad:;• 4 .qt, Charlie Alexander, • d� � PE. AICP Senior Associate I to xi v. University of Colorado, Denver College of Architecture and Planning—Adjunct Lecturer on Bicycle&Pedestrian About Planning&Design (2016-present) National Complete Streets Coalition—Complete Streets Charlie is a national Complete Streets expert who Workshop Instructor(2015-present) specializes in complex multimodal transportation planning University of California, Berkeley Institute of Transportation and engineering projects.In addition to Active Studies Technology Transfer Program—Instructor of Transportation projects,his project experience includes Complete Streets Planning&Design (2014-present) traffic operations,safety,transit planning,travel demand forecasting and traffic engineering design projects.Charlie Expertise applies this diverse experience to projects that require complex bicycle,pedestrian and transit design solutions; • Bikeway and Walkway Designs consent-building around modal tradeoffs;and strategic • Corridor Studies stakeholder and community engagement. He is a leader of • Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans Fehr&Peers'companywide Bicycle&Pedestrian • Multimodal Safety Discipline Group and teaches courses on Complete Streets • Crosswalk Policies to master's students and other practitioners through the • Campus Master Plans University of Colorado, Denver,the National Complete • Transit Planning Streets Coalition and the University of California, Berkeley. • Traffic Operations and Simulation In addition to his Complete Streets work,Charlie has • Traffic Impact Analysis completed numerous campus planning and design • Travel Demand Forecasting projects for universities throughout Colorado and • Traffic Engineering Design California including serving as the on-call traffic engineer for the University of California, Davis where he regularly developed solutions to resolve transportation-related Project Experience issues for the 35,000-student campus. 17th&Garfield Bicycle Signal Design Education Project manager for design of a bicycle signal on the Garfield Neighborhood Bikeway in Denver at 17th Avenue. Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering- Bucknell University, The bicycle signal will facilitate bicyclist and pedestrian Lewisburg, PA,2007 crossings of 17th Avenue from Garfield Street onto the pathway system in City Park.Also prepared Registrations signing/striping plans. East Arapahoe Transportation Plan Licensed Civil Engineer:Colorado No.49117 Leading Active Transportation-related elements of a Licensed Civil Engineer:California No.78529 corridor study on four miles of East Arapahoe Avenue in Licensed Civil Engineer:Washington No.49778 Boulder from Folsom Street to 75th Street.The corridor American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP): No.27421 plan includes one-way protected bike lanes,multi use Instructor Experience paths and intersection treatments to improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety. Fehr&Peers analyzed alternatives 2990 Lava Ridge Court Fflbr) Suite urt e I R s vel I no a mpire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Roseville,CA 95661 Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San Jose I Seattle I Washington,DC I Walnut Creek 916 773 1900 81 Charlie Alexander, PE, MCP according to level of comfort for bicyclist and pedestrians and is producing forecasts of likely levels of walking and UC Davis On-Call biking with implementation of the plan. As their on-call transportation consultant,Charlie managed 26 projects from 2009 to 2014,including: Stout Street,Champa Street&29th Avenue Bike Lane Traffic impact studies Designs Long-range planning projects Prepared designs in Denver for protected bike lanes on Infrastructure studies Stout Street,buffered bike lanes on Champa Street and a Conceptual designs combination of protected, buffered and standard bike Signing/striping/signal designs lanes on 29th Avenue.Over four miles of design in total, Event traffic/parking studies including demolition plans,sign relocation/installation Charlie frequently worked with campus planners,architects plans and striping plans.Each of these projects was and engineers to ensure that Fehr&Peers'work reflected constructed in 2016 and can be seen here: their values and priorities for improving the transportation https://youtu.be/xwUNZamV_c environment on the UC Davis campus. Denver Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines UC San Diego Bicycle&Pedestrian Master Plan Fehr&Peers developed guidelines for the City of Denver The BPMP sets a vision for bicycling and walking on the for the public works department to use in determining UC San Diego campus and identifies specific actions for whether or not to mark an uncontrolled crosswalk.The high-priority locations.Charlie assisted with outreach, guidelines also address device selection including RRFBs, identified campus gateway improvements,and prepared PHB/HAWKs and pedestrian signals.Fehr&Peers conceptual designs for high-priority locations. reviewed and summarized best-practice research in developing the guidelines. CSU Sacramento Campus Master Plan Charlie led Fehr&Peers'work on the Campus Master Plan, East Covell Corridor Plan including estimates of campus trip generation for various Led traffic engineering and multimodal transportation on-campus housing scenarios.He also analyzed key planning tasks for this corridor in Davis,California. roadway reconfiguration scenarios and made Improvements included a complete network of multi-use recommendations for transit, pedestrian,and bicyclist paths and buffered bike lanes and intersection circulation. reconfigurations to maximize bicyclist and pedestrian safety.This plan led to the installation of California's first protected intersection at the Covell Boulevard/1 Street intersection. University of Denver Campus Transportation Master Plan Charlie was the project manager for the Campus Transportation Master Plan,a data-driven process that engaged University staff and leadership to develop consensus around recommendations for all modes of transportation.Key recommendations included parking management practices to reduce the need for additional parking,a campus shuttle to the nearby light rail station, microtransit to housing-rich areas in the region,increased car share on campus,improvements to City streets that bisect the campus,priority parking for ride share and car share,separated bike paths,on-campus housing, restricting freshmen from bringing cars to campus and a variety of Transportation Demand Management programs. F E H R ' ' PEERS 2990 Lava Ridge Court Suite 200 Denver I Roseville I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Roseville,CA 95661 Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San José I Seattle I Washington,DC I Walnut Creek 916.773.1900 82 ALFREDO C. SANCHEZ, AIA, MCP, LEED AP PROJECT MANAGER /URBAN DESIGN ,;� ► Urban Planner of the Year- 2006 ► Florida-registered architect and AICP-certified planner ► 40+ years architecture and urban planning and design experience / Over 100 major planning studies and urban design plans in Miami Specialized experience in: City wide master plans, corridor plans, major reconstruction efforts, pedestrian improvements, urban, retail and YEARS OF EXP. mixed-use Development projects, land planning projects including 40+ redevelopment and design of new communities EDUCATION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: Master of Architecture, • Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan, Palmetto Bay, FL University of Pennsylvania, 1978 • Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Urban Village Regulations (Form Based Code), FL Master of City Planning, • Port Tampa Bay Channelside Master Plan, Tampa, FL University of • Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan, Ft. Lauderdale, FL Pennsylvania, 1978 • Pompano Beach Waterfront Master Plan, Pompano Beach, FL Bachelor of Architecture, • Baylink Light Rail Urban & Station Design, Miami Beach, FL University of Florida, • North Corridor Alternative Analysis & Station Area Design, Miami- 1972 Dade & Broward Counties, FL REGISTRATION • 2020 Long Range Master Plan, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, Registered Architect, State of Florida, 1979 Miami-Dade County, FL Reg. No. AR 0007969 • 2040 Strategic Master Plan, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, FL Registered Architect, • City-Wide Master Plan, Hollywood, FL Colegio Federado de • South Dade Redevelopment Plan, "The Moss Plan", Miami-Dade Ingenieros y Arquitectos, Costa County, FL Rica, 1985 • City Wide Parks Master Plan, Hallandale Beach, FL American Institute of • Dolphin Park and Ride Station Master Plan, Miami, FL Certified Planners, 1994 • Florida Department of Transportation District 6 - Livable Communities Certified General Project, Miami, FL Contractor, 2004 (inactive) • Cruise Port Transportation and Land Area Master Plans, Various Ports World Wide ba 83 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (CONT.): • Port Miami TIGER II Grant Application 2010 Miami, FL CERTIFICATIONS LEED AP Certification, • City of Homestead Historic Downtown Master Plan Homestead, FL 2007 • Collier Neighborhood Development Master Plan, Pompano PROFESSIONAL Beach, FL AFFILIATIONS • Hollywood Boulevard Multimodal Center, Hollywood, FL American Institute of Certified Planners, 1994 • Town Center Master Plan, Coconut Creek, FL • South Creek Neighborhood Landscape Improvements, Coconut Creek, FL • Beach Plaza Redevelopment and Public Beach Revitalization Design, Pompano Beach, FL • Key West Naval Base Reuse Master Plan, Key West, FL • Central Park Village Hope VI, Tampa, FL • New Orleans Neighborhoods Rebuilding Plan - A Strategy for Reconstruction, New Orleans, Louisiana • Guste Homes Hope VI, New Orleans, Louisiana • New Haven Empowerment Zone Neighborhood Plan, New Haven, Connecticut ba 84 RESUME I Edwin Mojena, PE Edwin Mojena, P E Years of Experience: 24 Principal-in-Charge/Roadway Design Task Manager Mr. Mojena is a Vice President and Senior Project Manager responsible for Education: Lochner's South Florida Transportation Unit,operating out Lochner's Miami office. • Bachelor of Science in Civil He joined the firm in 2009 and hat 22 years of experience in reconstruction Engineering,University of Florida 1993 projects,as well as the design of new controlled access facilities.As a project • Masters of Science in Civil Engineering, manager and lead engineer,Mr.Mojena has been involved in multiple tollways Florida International University 2002 corridors,developing comprehensive master plans for each of the five MDX tolled expressway facilities.Specifically,he was involved in developing the alignment for Professional ' • Professional Engineer FL#62002 the SR 874 and SR 924 HEFT Interchanges,while serving as the GEC for MDX. Mr. • Professional Engineer:LA#31283 Mojena led inter-agency coordination for many MDX projects between the • National Council of Examiners for Eng. Turnpike,FDOT,SFWMD,Miami-Dade County RER,and stakeholders.This and Survey:MLST#25563 coordination led to the adoption of these projects by the Miami-Dade MPO into their LRTP. Mr. Mojena is an experienced design team leader,with considerable Affiliations: expertise in the development and oversight of design projects, including schedules • American Society of Civil Engineers and budgets;team staff management;coordination with stakeholders,utility • Florida Engineering Society providers,intergovernmental agencies,and subconsultants. Certifications: • FDOT Certified MOT Advanced PROJECT EXPERIENCE SR 985-SW 107 Avenue,from Killian Parkway to 581'South of SW 88 Street;Miami- Areas of Expertise: Dade County,FL • ADA Facility Evaluation/Design Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 • Interchange Design • Intersection Analysis/Design Principal-in-Charge 1 2010-2012 3R project that required the development alternatives for a Turbo Lane Design, • Management Consulting • Pavement Evaluation/Design widening,ADA,Signalization,TTCP and Milling&Resurfacing activities.Duties • Pedestrian Crossing Design(At Grade) included project management,design,permitting&public involvement.This • Program Management project has an estimated construction cost of$1 million dollars.Services for this • Plans,Specifications and Estimates project also entails drainage modification,safety,and signal improvement. (PS&E) Responsible for: • Proposal Development • Performing overall project management and quality control review of • Public Involvement deliverables • Public Meeting Coordination • Quality Control and Assurance Eller Drive ICTF-Supplement No.3(ITS,SPM,Lighting);Broward County,FL • Railroad Crossing Design(At-Grade) Client:T.Y.Lin International • RFP/RFQ Development/Administration Principal-in-Charge I 2009-2010 • Roundabout Interchange Design Services to be provided includes for the Florida Department of Transportation • Urban Planning District Four are: Roadway,Lighting,Signalization,Landscape and Miscellaneous Structure design for ITS and inclusion of Design Bulletin for Structure.Lochner is a subconsultant to TYLI. SR 934ME 79th Street Causeway Over Intracoastal Waterway(Bascular Bridge Nos.870082&8700554);Miami-Dade County, FL Client:Corzo,Castella,Carballo,Thompson,Salman Project Manager 1 2010-2012 Overall project coordination and implementing specifications revisions or supplements before project going to letting. Lochner performed field visit to review the existing bridges condition with the last bridge inspection reports and the existing bridge plans, restore concrete spall areas located in several places of the bridge,concrete railing,columns,wing walls,caps,beams and approach slab,replace existing damaged expansion joint seals on the decks and seal abutment joints with hot poured material, restore/repair some cracked welds or broken rivet connect ions,missing nuts on the fixed bearings,replace or tighten missing bolts at the steel deck,gusset plates and tie plate's connect ions as needed,inject and seal cracks located in several places of the bridge,restore as needed,clean and paint structural steel elements at the bascule spans,girders,floor beams,steel grid deck,bracing,counter weight,access hatches,ladders, platforms and machinery room equipment,according to the surface preparation and painting procedure prepared by Greenman-Pedersen,Inc.Company, LOCHNER 85 RESUME Edwin Mojena,PE clean and seal concrete walls using Class 5 Finish.See the wing walls and bridge concrete railings(exterior and interior), restore embankment erosion,undermining of slope protection and displaced riprap in the abutment,restore bridge fender system and navigational lights system as needed.Responsible for: • Managing this bridge girder rehabilitation project SR 968(W Flagler Street over Miami River);Miami-Dade County, FL Client:Corzo,Castella,Carballo,Thompson,Salman Project Manager 1 2010-2011 Services for project entailed updates of specification package,preparation of MSP to address revision,update TRNSPORT, preparation of cost-estimate comparison of concrete pile vs.composite lumber,update cost estimate to reflect final section. Structural design of plastic composite reinforcing piles for non-standard system for a fender system subjected to ship rotational loads.FB-Piers analysis for impact and eight-connections.Lochner was responsible for providing support structural engineering services for the bridge repair as well as structural engineering services for substructures.Responsible for: • Managing bridge rehabilitation • Providing support structural engineering services for the bridge repair as well as structural engineering services for substructures SR-860/NW 183 Street/Miami Gardens from NW 57 Avenue to 90'W of NW 28 PL;Miami-Dade County,FL Client:Bolton-Perez&Associates Principal-in-Charge 1 2010-2012 Temp.Traffic Control Plans for 1595-I 95-SR 84 Rainbow Interchange;Broward County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 4 Project Manager 1 2011-2012 Design and preparation of TCP level 3 and S&PM plans for 13 bridge structures along the 1-95 corridor in Broward County. Production complete submitted ahead of schedule. Responsible for: • Assisting the FDOT Bridge Maint.Department with Design Services by developing Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCP) including lane closure analysis for 13 bridge structures deck overlay as well as TTCP for Class V Painting for features intersected for the same 13 bridge structures FL Airport Runway Extension Peer Review;Broward County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 4 Project Manager 1 2011-2012 Assistance with the Review of Technical proposals in relation to the Fort Lauderdale Airport Runway Extension over SR-5/US- 1&FEC RR Tracks. 1-95(SR 9A)Rehabilitation,NW 79th Street to NW 103rd Street;Miami-Dade County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 Project Manager 1 2012-2016 Design,production and coordination for the rigid pavement rehabilitation of 1.4 miles segment of 1-95.Responsible for: • Managing design,production and coordination for the rigid pavement rehabilitation of 1.4 miles segment of 1-95 SR 70(Okeechobee Road)and Jenkins Road Intersection Improvements;St.Lucie County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 4 Project Manager I 2012-2017 Design of 1.5 miles roadway improvements including intersection improvements,the addition of through lanes and turn lanes to improve intersection capacity.Responsible for: • Managing design,production and coordination SR A1A-Collins Avenue-Indian Creek Drainage Along 43rd Street;Miami Beach,FL Client:The Corradino Group Principal-in-Charge I 2012-2015 Structural design of a precast concrete pump station and the surrounding sheet pile walls,as well as design of the station's electrical system,as part of an urban drainage upgrade.Responsible for: • Providing structural and electrical design for this drainage improvement project LOCHNER 86 RANDY HOLLINGWORTH DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STUDIO ► Director of Planning & Landscape Architecture ► 30+ years experience in Urban Design & Landscape Prepared Development plans for a wide range of project types • Has a large and diverse portfolio of landscape design oriented projects YEARS OF EXP. > Developed master plans and design guidelines for commercial and retail 36+ areas, office parks and residential communities in numerous waterfront locations throughout Florida EDUCATION Master of Landscape RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard • Port Tampa Bay Channelside Master Plan, Tampa, FL University, 1984 • Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan, Ft. Lauderdale, FL Bachelor of Landscape • Truman Waterfront Park, Key West, FL Architecture, University • Pompano Beach Waterfront Master Plan, Pompano Beach, FL of Guelph, 1978 • City Wide Parks Master Plan, Hallandale Beach, FL • Beach Plaza Redevelopment and Public Beach Revitalization Design, Pompano Beach, FL • South Creek Neighborhood Landscape Improvements Plan, Coconut Creek, FL • Dolphin Park and Ride Station Master Plan, Miami, FL • Beautification Master Plan, Miami Lakes FL • South City Beach Park Master Plan. Hallandale Beach, FL • B.F. James Park & Aquatic Facility Master Plan, Hallandale Beach, FL • Sullivan Park Master Plan, Deerfield Beach, FL • Scavo Park Master Plan, Hallandale Beach, FL • Wittkop Park Master Plan, Homestead, FL • West Drive Park Master Plan, North Bay Village, FL • Intracoastal Parks, Sunny Isles Beach, FL • Redevelopment Plan, Clearwater, FL* • Kate Jackson Park, Tampa, FL* • Regency Auditorium, Pensacola Christian College, Pensacola, FL* ba 'Prior to Joining B&A 87 Manuel G Vera, Jr., PSM Principal / Senior Surveyor Education/Training M.G. VERA Bachelor of Science, Legal Studies, Nova Southeastern University, 1994 Associates of Science, Land Surveying, Miami Dade College, 1988 xssoctAT ,Inc. Professional Registration Professional Surveyor & Mapper, Florida, PSM#5291 (1994) Years of Experience 34 Years (with MGV for 34 years) Office Location Miami, Florida Professional Affiliations Florida Surveying & Mapping Society Mr. Vera Jr., a registered Land Surveyor has over 34 years of experience with the company and throughout the state of Florida. He has managed a variety of survey contracts and projects for the Florida Department of Transportation, Miami — Dade County, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, City of Miami, and numerous Engineering and Design firms. Mr. Vera has performed and managed all types of surveying services including: Design Surveys, Right-of-Way Control Surveys, Right-of-Way Mapping, Platting, Construction Layout, As-built Surveys, Drainage Surveys, etc. Mr. Vera is a Senior Surveyor and Mapper as well as our Senior Project Manager. He has extensive experience in the management and coordination of survey projects involving a variety of surveying techniques such as Aerial Surveys, Conventional Ground Surveying, Utilities designation, etc. Surveying Experience: Manuel G Vera &Associates, Inc. (1983-current) City of Port St. Lucie, Cross Town Parkway Segment 1 from Manth Lane to US1 Sub Consultant to: RS&H, Inc. Contact: Rachel Back, PE, CFM (904) 256-2444, rachel.back@rsandh.com Duration: 03/2015 thru 04/2016 Cost: $183,080 (Survey Services: $133,080.00 & SUE Services: $50,000.00) Project Length: 2.5 miles Role: Project Manager Project Description: MGV prepared a complete Design survey which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical (NAVD 88) control networks, the creation of Topographic surveys and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D) in 3D laser scanning, perform cross sections, aerial targets, subdivision location (up to 100, as required), and geotechnical support. FDOT District IV, Districtwide Right of Way Mapping Production Support Consultant to: FDOT District IV Contact: Paul Doll, PE, paul.doll@dot.state.us Duration: 2014 thru On-Going Cost: $1.5 Million Project Length: Task Work Order Based Role: Project Manager Brief Description: On this district wide task oriented contract, MGV is in charge for all survey activities including field survey activities and office support and mapping tasks for the duration of the contract. Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, PD&E Study for Widening Sawqrass from South of US 441 to West of Powerline Road Sub Consultant to: The Corradino Group, Inc. Contact: Mike Ciscar, PE (305) 594-0735, mcisar@corradino.com 88 Manuel G Vera, Jr., PSM Principal / Senior Surveyor Duration: 05/2016 thru Present Cost: $581,822.00 Project Length: 4 miles Role: Project Manager Project Description: MGV is responsible for preparing a complete Design survey, which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, the creation of Topographic surveys and Digital Terrain Model, as well as provide subsurface utility engineering services (SUE). FDOT District IV, Turnpike Widening Atlantic to Boynton Beach Boulevard Sub Consultant to: GAI Consultants, Inc. Contact: John Saunders, PE (321) 319-3089, j.saunders@gaiconsultants.com Location: Palm Beach County, FL Duration: 01/2016 thru Present (Est. end date 07/2019) Cost: $262,847.00 Project Length: 4.9 miles Project Description: MGV was responsible for providing a Design Survey consisting of the following deliverables: the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, Survey Baseline and Right of Way Lines, Aerial Targets, creation of Topographic survey and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D) in 3D laser scanning, Roadway Cross-Sections/Profiles, Bridge Survey, Channel Survey, and Pond Site Survey, and Project Network Control Sheets. FDOT District VI, SR 826 Palmetto Expressway from East of NW 67th Avenue to East of NW 57th Avenue (Segment 3) - (MP 18.117 to MP 19.08) Sub Consultant to: TRACE Consultants, Inc. Contact: Frank Panellas, PE (305) 338-1509, jfpanellas@traceci.com Duration: 11/2016 thru Present (plans completion date is 3/28/19 & production completion date is 9/11/23) Cost: $91,122.61 Project Length: 1 mile Role: Project Manager Project Description: The primary purpose of this project is to relieve congestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity, enhance safety by addressing operational, structural and functional deficiencies and provide additional travel options. These improvements consist of the addition of express lanes, auxiliary lanes, reconstruction of the mainline and improvements to the existing interchanges. MGV is responsible for the following design survey tasks: 1.) Using the existing survey control, establish horizontal and vertical project network controls and re-set/add monuments that have been destroyed on project network control sheets; 2.)Extend the existing Topographic and DTM Survey; 3.) Planimetrics- locating approximately 600 trees along the main line of SR 826 / Palmetto Expressway; 4.) Check Cross Sections; 5.)A Drainage Survey to be performed along NW 57"' Ave; and 6.) Geotechnical Support- approximately 250 test holes will be located with horizontal and vertical values. PWWM, Miscellaneous Stormwater Infrastructure Surveys— Master Plan Basins— Section: (3-41-24) Consultant to: Miami Dade County Public Works and Waste Management Department Contact: Frank M. Velazquez, PSM (305) 372-6529, velazf(cmiamidade.gov Duration: 07/2014 thru 10/2016 Cost: $191,525.00 (Task A, Phase I, II, Ill- $161,425.00 /Task B, $30,100.00) Project Length: Task Work Order Based Role: Project Manager Project Description: MGV provided survey services, which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, as well as coordinates, elevation, and description for all points. Points included are: Structures (Catch-Basins, Manholes, Structure, Grease Interceptors), Outfall/Culverts, a total of four (4) Canal Cross Sections, Bridges, Control Structures (Watergates, etc.), Topographic Survey, and Field Reconnaissance. 89 (-- ---' CD O O _ Q) _ Q � � LL O C NCo . L L CD (1)° (75 O .— U C/) 0 OC }' O C D C L O co Q U) C � .0 CU co ._o ° C L 0) U N � O OO C O O)w co co �� � O L 0 i44: O O L .° L ca E o a 4 >> 0 Q (/) 073-'x3 U = c� i CZ 0O Q)•L c CD co+.+ E Q 0 p 0 = c o Q C - . E D o > L. C -° � - OU ca • C C E m co N ca C w Q C �•C Q 47_, O L '- C CO C (_n a) U X (B To Ov > a) p �� L 0 a) -0 O o 0 c� (_) CO a v a) > C a) 0 o 0 - o Q R3 O0 `L E -C2 "3 -(1) t a) a) (73 s � o /� = O C > C C . O E cn 0�- Q 5 C N O C a cm CT)L N a) 0 .0 O 4- /O c -0 CO C a) C cn O C p v) W E 4) � N > L E. C _o L •- cu 2 U 45 , V O D ° E *Ec� E 4-, O ..0 v) O m _ — 0 — E OCCE O) _O c • •E E 'a o c E " co U E E U O CU c - �, ° G ,, o 93 .ff .n Q O a3 E cn C > oc\3 >, E L -0 0 E v a) c� -t .- CLU � 0 � c a) cp -0 •— >, -- >, E L- a a) ap a) ., m ° 0 o U (3 . D -O t Q) N "— -p -p O c U . LI) c a) CZ c ° CZ c13 CO E o ° CO W L. v) 0 0 H L.T. L.T.1 — 2 2 2 Z • 0 Cl) •• •• •• •• •• . D 8 2 41111 METRICGeorge Robert Myers III ENGINEERING North Florida Environmental Manager TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE c. L Corr piar_e Mr. Myers is experienced providing a wide array of environmental assessments and technical —r3r•`-pe-.=rs'Planning reports, with an emphasis on PD&E, wildlife surveys, and environmental permitting. Mr. dre-re-!ai S.,r,eys Myers has held USFWS 10(a)(1)(A) endangered species permits for 20 federally listed species, and is a proven PDBE scientist who has managed PD&E projects in five FDOT YEARS OF EXPERIENCE districts. ears REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS EDUCATION US 90 PD&E Study, Santa Rosa County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist: Providing S J-';ss r, c- 7=:,3s,:;_st n environmental management and OA/OC for this PD&E Study of a new roadway alignment .21within Milton, FL. The study covers approximately five miles and faces unique challenges PROFESSIONAL from Section 4(0 impacts, relocations, contamination, and a river crossing. Mr. Myer's REGISTRATIONS principal duties include serving as the lead author for the Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan, _.3,72 _=c gop�sr Ta^,vise the Section 4(f) DOA and DOE, the Contamination Screening Evaluation Report as well as n ,nri?`, l.. ,g,,2g providing support for the Noise Study Report. Client FDOT District 3; Reference: Peggy Kelley,(850)547-2122, Project Length: 5 miles; Begin/End Dates: March 2014 to present OFFICE LOCATION P3nara Sity L SR 408 PD&E Study, from SR 50 to SR 50/SR 520 Intersection, Orange County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist - Mr. Myers is the environmental lead for this project. He was heavily involved in corridor analysis and selection and is overseeing the production of all environmental documents. The project involves creating a new roadway corridor and establishing a new river crossing. Key concerns include impacts to listed species, wetlands, the Econlockhatchee River, residential relocation, and other social impacts. Client: Central Florida Expressway Authority, Reference: Lance Decuir(407)806-4482, BeginlEnd Dates:April 2015—Ongoing Tri-Rail Coastal Link PD&E Study, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist: Providing support covering a wide range of issues. This 80-mile rail project spanning Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties proposes to add new rail segments and 27 new stations to greatly expand commuter rail service in South Florida. Mr. Myers work includes development of the Wetland Evaluation Report, Endangered Species Biological Assessment, Section 4(0 evaluation, Air Quality Technical Memorandum, and Contamination Screening Evaluation Report.Client: FDOT District 4, Reference:Amie Goddeau, (954)777-4343:Begin/End Dates: March 2014 to Ongoing CR 510 PDBE Study,from CR 512 to 58"Avenue,Indian River County,FL,Senior Environmental Scientist:This project involves the expansion of an existing rural two-lane county road to four lanes. Mr. Myers is the Lead Environmental Scientist in charge of developing all environmental documents, including the ESBA, WER, NSR, CSER, section 4(0 documentation and the Categorical Exclusion Type II. In addition he is in charge of conducting nest surveys for the federally listed caracara and supporting coordination with FDEP for unavoidable impacts to lands purchased with Florida Forever Funds. Client: FDOT District 4, Reference: Maria Formosa(954)777-4677, Begin/End Dates: February 2016-Ongoing Oslo Road PD&E Study,Indian River County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist: Mr. Myers provided environmental survey and documentation support. serving as the lead author of the Endangered Species Biological Assessment, and providing support for the Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan,Wetland Evaluation Report,Contamination Screening Evaluation Report,and Categorical Exclusion Type II for this proposed roadway widening project in rural Indian River County, which will tie into a new interchange with 1-95. Key concerns under evaluation include potential secondary and cumulative impacts from the effect the roadway may have to stimulate development of the adjacent agricultural lands. Client: FDOT District 4, Reference: Sabrina Aubery, PE (954) 777-4585, Begin/End Dates: July 2014-2016 SR 25 (Okeechobee Road) PD&E Study, Miami-Dade County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist: This project proposes to improve overall traffic operations from SR 997/Krome Avenue to NW 79th Avenue. Specific components include roadway improvements, frontage road enhancements, signalized intersection improvements, interchange modifications, bridge widening/Canal crossing improvements, and multimodal options. Mr. Myers is providing support for the Section 4(p Evaluation, which is a complex 91 G. Robert Myers III Senior Environmental Scientist assessment involving the complete taking of a recreational facility, requiring a high-level coordination with the local community and with FHWA through FOOT. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: BaoYing Wang, P.E., (305)470-5211 Begin/End Dates:June 2012 to 2015 NE 36 Ave PD&E, from SR 492 to NE 35 St, Marion County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist: This PD&E involves roadway improvements for an urbanizing corridor including evaluating a new overpass for a rail crossing. Mr. Myers served as the lead author of the Endangered Species Biological Assessment, and provided support for the Section 4(f) DOA, Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan, Wetland Evaluation Report, Contamination Screening Evaluation Report, and Categorical Exclusion Type II. Client: FDOT District 5, Reference:Jazlyn Heywood (386)943-5388, Begin/End Dates:June 2013—2016 NE 25 Ave PD&E, from SR 492 to NE 35 St, Marion County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist: This PD&E involves roadway improvements for an urbanizing corridor including evaluating a new overpass for a rail crossing. Mr. Myers served as the lead author of the Endangered Species Biological Assessment. and provided support for the Section 4(f) DOA, Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan, Wetland Evaluation Report, Contamination Screening Evaluation Report, and Categorical Exclusion Type II. Client: FDOT District 5. Reference:Jazlyn Heywood (386)943-5388, BeginlEnd Dates:June 2013-2016 SR 87 Roadway Connector Design,Santa Rosa County, FL,Senior Environmental Scientist:This project involves a new roadway alignment that crosses Critical Habitat for listed species as well as wetlands and a river. Mr. Myers is providing environmental and permitting support. Specific duties include conducting field surveys for a federally protected salamander and providing coordination and listed species permitting services with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Client: FDOT District 3, Reference: Peggy Kelley, (850) 547- 2122, BeginlEnd Dates: March 2014 to present 1-75 ITS Installation Wetland Delineation, Listed Species Survey, and Environmental Permitting, Alachua, Columbia, and Hamilton Counties,FL,Senior Environmental Scientist Conducted a wetland delineation and gopher tortoise burrow survey for 87 miles of ITS installation. Tasks also included coordination of avoidance and minimization measures with design engineers, agency coordination, and obtaining permits from USAGE and SJRWMD through FDEP. Client: FDOT District 2 Reference: Carolyn Malphurs (386)943-5262,Begin/End Dates: September 2014-March 2015 1-75 ITS Installation Wetland Delineation, Listed Species Survey, and Environmental Permitting, Marion County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist— Performed wetland delineation and gopher tortoise burrow survey on 20 miles of ITS installation. Tasks also included coordination of avoidance/minimization measures with design engineers, agency coordination, and obtaining permits from USAGE and SJRWMD. Client: FDOT District 5 Reference: Van Humphreys(386)961-7465, Begin/End Dates: September 2014 to March 2015 SR 710 Wetland Delineation and Permitting Support, Indian River County, FL, Senior Environmental Scientist—This roadway improvement project in Indian River County involved delineating wetlands along the project corridor, performing a wildlife survey and coordinating project design with the engineers to minimize permit requirements. Mr. Myers coordinated field surveys and data analysis as well as assisted with team coordination and permitting. Client: FDOT District 4, Reference: David Bogardus (954) 777-4339, BeginlEnd Dates: May 2006-November 2016 Statewide Arborist Services for Vegetation Management Permitting, FDOT Central Office, Senior Environmental Scientist— This contract provides support to FDOT Central Office for the statewide Vegetation Management Permitting Program pertaining to outdoor advertising. Work includes conducting field landscape evaluations within FDOT right of way to determine the size, species, quality and appraised value of landscape vegetation. Work also includes evaluation of proposed applications, including plan review for vegetation maintenance and removal practices for compliance with State Statute and permit requirements. Client: FDOT Central Office, Right of Way; Reference: Morris Pigott(850)414-4574; BeginlEnd Dates: March 2014 to present 92 uerra ISr SOUTH FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE RAJ KRISHNASAMY, P.E. Mr. Raj Krishnasamy, P.E., President and Principal Engineer of Tierra South Florida, Inc. (TSF), PRESIDENT,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER is a Florida State registered Geotechnical Engineer with over 30 years of experience. Mr. 3o Years of Experience Krishnasamy oversees the geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing, and inspection services operations. His experience consists of successfully completing over 3,500 public and private projects. He has extensive experience within Miami-Dade County and has --- successfully completed over 350 projects within Miami-Dade County in the past 10 years. He serves as Project Manager for continuing contracts with over 20 Florida public agencies. He has . , a history of repeatedly retaining those contracts through successful. cost-effective and prompt If execution of each task order. Mr. Krishnasamy's daily involvement with the in-house and field operations of the construction and geotechnical services departments provides him the 'hands- on" experience and knowledge of current construction codes and construction practices throughout the State of Florida. Mr. Krishnasamy and his highly experienced team focus on providing the client with a consistently accurate. cost-effective quality product that is delivered on • time and within budget. t . RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE 1 SW 184th Street from Approximately 1200 Feet East of SW 157th Avenue to Approximately 100' West of SW 170th Avenue, Miami-Dade County, Florida Roadway improvement project EDUCATION which includes roadway widening to provide paved shoulders for SW 184th Street. Provided geotechnical recommendations and evaluation of the site and subsurface conditions with respect MS in Geotechnical to the planned roadway improvements and for site preparation and foundation construction. Engineering. University of Memphis 1995 Grove Isle Seawall Repair, Biscayne Bay, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering BS in Civil Engineering. study for the seawall repair project for the southern portion of the seawall. Provided geotechnical Christian Brothers University discussion of subsurface and groundwater conditions. Provided soil parameters for foundation 1987 design for new steel sheet piles. Diploma/1984/Electronic 1-95 Express Lanes from the Golden Glades in Miami-Dade County to Broward Boulevard Engineering, Malaysian Air in Broward County, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, Florida Performed a geotechnical Force Institute engineering study for the extension of the High Occupancy Toll Express lanes from northern Miami-Dade County north 13 miles to Fort Lauderdale. The project included installing Intelligent Transportation System components: modifying the Ives Dairy Rd interchange: bridge widening at PROFESSIONAL specific locations and installing new noise barrier walls at locations between Hollywood Blvd. and ORGANIZATION AND Taft St. Performed geotechnical study for roadway widening, bridge widening, overhead signs, REGISTRATION MSE walls, toll equipment gantries and buildings. During construction. provided pile driving inspection and foundation certification. Professional Engineer: Florida. 53567 SR-997 (Krome Avenue) from SR-94/Kendall Drive to SR-90/SW 8 Street, Miami-Dade Certified OSHA Supervisor County, Florida. The project consists of the realignment of Krome Avenue from SR 94 (Kendall Drive) to SR 90 (Tamiami Trail) in Miami, Florida and is approximately 5 miles long. The Certified Environmental improvements include the realignment of the existing roadway. The purpose of the study was to Consultant provide geotechnical input to the design team to assist in evaluation of the merits of the roadway I improvements. Field work included auger borings and muck probes. Utilities, including a 30-inch force main and water main, which were to remain in place, were factored into geotechnical recommendations and proposed options. Geotechnical recommendations included the discussion of various options such as surcharge, reinforced soil platform, geo-synthetic, demucking and soil mixing. TSF also provided geotechnical recommendations involving I permanent cut/fill slopes, excavations, groundwater control, pavement design, and on site soil suitability. TSF is currently providing construction support services including evaluation of surcharge settlement. 93 , t . erra SOUTH FLORIDA RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE, Continued RAJ KRISHNASAMY, P.E. HEFT All Electronic Toll (AET) Phase 1 and 2 (Design Build), Miami-Dade County, Florida PRESIDENT,PRINCIPAL ENGINEER Performed geotechnical study for AET toll systems on Homestead extension Florida's Turnpike 30 Years of Experience (HEFT) from milepost 0 to milepost 27 and the study included toll equipment gantries, toll equipment buildings, overhead sign structures, auxiliary lanes and ramp improvements, retaining Page2of2 walls, drainage improvements. Additionally, performed inspection services during pile and shaft installations and provided foundation certifications. MDX SR 874/Don Shula Expressway and SR 878/Snapper Creek Expressway ORT, Miami- Dade County, Florida Provided asphalt plant inspections (verification testing) for compliance with FDOT specifications and project requirements. TSF also provided weld inspections at machine shop for fabrication of monotubes and mast arm structures. 1-75 Express Lanes Segment A/B from NW 170th Street to South of Miramar Parkway, Broward & Miami-Dade Counties, Florida Performed a geotechnical study for the design and construction of Segments A&B of the 1-75 Express Lanes Project which extend from just north of NW 170th Street in Miami-Dade County at milepost 3.485 to approximately 2,400 feet south of Miramar Parkway in Broward County at milepost 1.080, for a total distance of approximately 3.1 miles. The project also includes reconstruction, widening, and milling and resurfacing of the HEFT mainline from 1.45 miles south to 1.13 miles north of 1-75 to accommodate the Express Lanes Median to Median Direct Connect between 1-75 and the HEFT, as well as other interchange ramp connections. This corridor includes fourteen (14) bridge structures, several associated MSE Walls. about 20,000 linear feet of sound walls. Toll Gantries, CCTV poles. High Mast Light Poles, and Overhead Sign Structures. Provided pile design for bridges, and design parameters for sound walls. poles, and sign structures. Currently providing pile driving inspections and auger cast pile inspections for sound walls,and foundation certifications for bridges and sound walls. North Bay Road Pedestrian Bridge and Observation Desk, Sunny Isles, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering study for the construction of a bridge over a canal connected to intracoastal waterway and located in between NE 172 and NE 174 streets in the City of Sunny Isles, Florida. Field study included 6 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings for the bridge and associated walls. Provided detailed information on subsurface and groundwater conditions. Computed axial capacities for 42-inch drilled shafts using FB-DEEP as well as lateral load analysis using L-Pile. Provided geotechnical engineering recommendations regarding foundation design and drilled shaft construction. Design-Build Rehabilitation of West Bridge and Bear Cut Bridge on Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami-Dade County, Florida: Performed a geotechnical engineering study for the rehabilitation of West Bridge and Bear Cut Bridge. As part of the project, Bear Cut Bridge will be widened on the north side to provide additional space for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The project also includes constructing French drains on the east and west sides of the bridge. Field work consisted of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings, Borehole Permeability (BHP) tests, and rock corings. Performed pile capacity analysis, prepared soil parameters and provided geotechnical engineering recommendations. TSF also performed studies to determine length and pile capacity of existing bridge(unknown foundation study). SR A1A/Ocean Drive-Shoreline Stabilization for FDOT District IV, St. Lucie County, Florida. Performed geotechnical engineering study for the possible use of sheet pile to stabilize some sections of the shoreline along SR A1A/Ocean Drive from MP 3.3 to MP 5.9. Provided soil parameters be considered in determining earth pressures for proposed sheet pile wall and other geotechnical recommendations. 94 [v h' m E TR I C Sonia Shreffler-Bogart, PE, PTOE %ENGINEERING Project Manager OFFICE LOCATION PROFESSIONAL BIO Miami, Florida Ms. Shreffler-Bogart's experience includes assignments related to project management of traffic/transportation engineering and transportation planning/site development projects. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Tasks include working closely with other disciplines on multi-discipline projects; OVERALL establishing methodologies and performing analyses: writing technical reports; communicating findings with staff; giving presentations of findings to clients, agencies and 25 ears the public. Projects completed were in private and public sectors at international, state, regional and local levels. PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS METRIC ENGINEERING, INC. (2010-PRESENT) • Professional Engineer—FL Miami Beach Active Traffic Management. As part of this effort, traffic along various key #55679(2000) corridors within the City of Miami Beach are being actively monitored for abnormal travel conditions during incidents such as crashes, lane closures, abrupt volume increase, etc. • Professional Traffic Traffic Operators utilize the CCTV cameras and Bluetooth/WiFi vehicle detection devices Operations Engineer—FL to provide travel time reports to City staff and signal engineer in order to evaluate and #2910(2010) implement signal timing modifications as appropriate. There are four main objectives for the Active Traffic Management program (1) Minimize traffic impacts. (2) Manage and provide orderly flow of traffic. (3) Minimize the use of police resources for traffic control EDUCATION activities. (4) Relay critical real-time travel information via social media (Twitter) and/or B.S.. Civil Engineering,Ohio State Variable Message Signs (VMS signs). In addition. signal timing patterns were developed University(1988) for various key corridors to accommodate the traffic flow during special events. The signal timing recommendations were developed using traffic counts, Synchro models and engineering judgment. Client: City of Miami Beach, Contact: Mr. Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, (305)673-700, Begin/End Dates: June 2014—Ongoing, Role: Chief Engineer Districtwide Traffic Operations & Safety Studies Consultant Services—The general purpose of this contract is to provide traffic engineering services through the development of various traffic operations and safety studies that will be identified for intersections, arterials. etc., and related improvement recommendations and evaluations. Client: FDOT District 6. Contact: Ramon Sierra (305) 470-5336. Begin/End Dates: June 2013—On-going. Role: Project Manager • SR A1A/MacArthur Causeway/5'h Street—Arterial Analysis/Signal Retiming 1 • SR A1A/Indian Creek Drive/Abbott Avenue/Harding Avenue—Arterial Analysis/Signal Retiming • SR A1A/Collins Avenue at 63'd Street Northbound Loop Detector Installation Evaluation • SR A1A/Indian Creek Drive at 65th Street—Pedestrian Evaluation Districtwide Traffic Operations Support Services Contract. This task work order basis contract has been utilized to develop travel time thresholds and monitor travel times for Palmetto Expressway Express Lanes project. A"mobility incentive" is provided for Construction Team to encourage achievement of highest travel time performance during the construction. A penalty is assessed against the"mobility incentive"when the travel time along the corridor exceeds the travel time thresholds. Travel time data is tracked in real time during the construction by Bluetooth/WiFi vehicle detection devices. These devices utilize wireless network equipment to transfer data from the devices to a central server where the data is processed. Travel time reports are provided to the Construction Team on a two-day interval. A monthly summary of penalties against the -mobility incentive" is also prepared and distributed. Grid power from the sign luminaires is utilized for providing power to all the travel time data collection stations. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Jacques Defrant, PE(305)470-5385, Begin/End Dates: June 2014—Ongoing. Role: Project Manager Districtwide Traffic Operations Studies Consultant Services (Districtwide, Miami-Dade County). The general purpose of this contract was to provide traffic engineering services through the development of various traffic operations studies identified for intersections, arterials, etc., and related improvement recommendations and evaluations. Project includes: Qualitative Assessments, Crash Analysis, Intersection Analysis, Level of Service Analysis, Arterial Analysis. Speed Zone Studies, Left Turn Phase Warrant Analysis, Pedestrian Studies, Delay Studies, Signal Warrant Analysis. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Esteban Espinal, El, 305- 470-5303. Begin/End Dates: January 2010—January 2015, Role: Project Manager Tri-Rail Coastal Link Service PD&E Study (85 miles, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties). This effort includes preparation of the environmental studies necessary to comply with FTA requirements and lead to the preparation of an Environmental Assessment for a proposed integrated regional rail transit system on the Florida East Coast Railway Corridor. The transit corridor being evaluated is along the existing FEC Railway that generally parallels Dixie Highway and U.S. 1. The 85-mile study area extends from Jupiter through Pompano Beach to downtown Miami. Ms. Bogart is the Senior Traffic Engineer,coordinating 95 Sonia Shreffler-Bogart, PE, PTOE Traffic Operations with the Corridor Management Oversight Consultant Consultant, FDOT Districts IV and VI, and multiple stakeholders, writing technical memos as needed for the CMOC and FOOT; and leading the traffic analyses efforts for rail-highway grade crossings and adjacent signalized intersections, in addition to the 25 station area locations along the alignment. Client: FOOT District 6, Contact: Howard H. Newman, PE,407-203-0653, Start/End Dates: 2014-Ongoing. Role:Sr.Traffic Engineer US-2715R-2510keechobee Road from NW 79th Avenue to SR•9971Krome Avenue(9.7 miles, Miami-Dade County). The study included conceptual design and the environmental study of roadway enhancements, frontage road enhancements, signalized intersection improvements, interchange modifications, and bridge widening to US 27/SR 25/Okeechobee Road from NW 79th Avenue to SR 997/Krome Avenue in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Lead traffic engineering efforts including review and coordination of travel demand model and existing and future operational analysis. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Bao-Ying Wang, PE (305- 470-5211),Begin/End Dates: May 2012-May 2014, Role: Sr.Traffic Engineer Consultant for Professional Urban Design and Planning Services(Area-Wide, Miami, Florida). Provide professional services throughout the DDA district which include transportation planning and traffic studies, planning and project feasibility studies, project options evaluations, preliminary site evaluations, feasibility analyses, and infrastructure investigative services, conceptual and final streetscape, public space, landscape design services, roadway, drainage and stormwater management analysis, public meetings and community outreach. Client: Miami Downtown Development Authority (ODA), Contact: Cesar Garcia-Pons, (305) 579-6675, BeginlEnd Dates:June 2011 -Ongoing,Role: Project Engineer SR 836 PD&E Study from NW 17d' Avenue Interchange to Midtown Interchange in Miami-Dade County for FDOT District 6. PD&E Study to evaluate a potential new ramp connection from SR 874 (Don Shula Expressway) to SW 128F Street. SR 874 currently ends at the interchange with SR 821/Florida's Turnpike/HEFT (1.4 miles) within the City of Miami. This new ramp connection would provide additional expressway access and mobility to the area. The study confirms the need and benefits to be provided by this connection: identifying potential corridors and alignments as well as potential environmental impacts. Led traffic engineering efforts including review and coordination of travel demand modeling and operational analysis.Client: FDOT District 6, Contact:Vilma Croft, PE(305)470-5240, Begin/End Dates:January 2007-August 2011, Role: Project/Traffic Engineer West Grove Traffic Circle Feasibility Study B030041 (Elizabeth Street at Shipping Avenue / New York Street at Shipping Avenue / Elizabeth Street at Day Avenue / New York Street at Day Avenue / McDonald Street (SW 32id Avenue) at Day Avenue,Miami, Florida). Provision of traffic circles at several intersections in the West Grove neighborhood of Miami, Florida. The vicinity is generally bound by Bird Avenue to the north, Grand Avenue to the south, SW 27th Avenue to the east and Douglas Road (SW 37"Avenue) to the west. The intersections were selected by the City of Miami based on requests and concerns received from area residents. Client: City of Miami, Contact: Tatiana Acosta, (305) 416-1263, Begin/End Dates: February 2010 - July 2010, Role: Project Manager Transportation Studies and Final Design of 14 Work Order Assignments for FONTUR, Republic of Venezuela, Occident Region. Traffic Operations Improvement Project Maracaibo, Venezuela. Conducted all aspects of traffic analysis for three separate corridors (isolated intersection and arterial analysis): presented analysis results and recommendations to FONTUR and IMTCUMA. Client: World Bank/Fontur, Republic of Venezuela, BeginlEnd Dates: June 1998-September 1999, Role:Traffic Engineer DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES (SEPTEMBER 1999-JANUARY 2010) • Riverbend DRI Fort Lauderdale • Okeechobee Rd/NW 186 St Operational&Safety Study • Miami Downtown DRI NOPC • LeJeune Rd/NW 103 St. Safety Assessment&LOS • Archstone at Dadeland Traffic Signal Warrant Study Analysis • West Ave./11 Street Traffic Signal Warrant Study • MPO Miami Gardens Circulator Feasibility Study • City of Miami MUSP Traffic Impact Studies • Park Square DRI NOPC • Boca Raton Library Traffic Concurrency Analysis • Kendall Town Center DRI • Coral Gables Trolley Feasibility Study • Miami Gardens Drive Extension Traffic Study • Biscayne Boulevard Corridor Study • Ponce de Leon Boulevard Median Evaluation • Lakes by the Bay South Commons Traffic Signal Warrant • MPO Locate Sites for Bus Shelter Installation Study Study • Killian Drive/SW 107 Avenue Safety Study Sonia Shrelffer-Bogart, PE, PTOE, Page 2 96 WALKER Jim Corbett,CAPP PARKING CONSULTANTS Jim is an innovative parking professional with more than twenty years of successful parking operation leadership and fiscal governance. Jim earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Business Psychology from Miami University in Oxford,Ohio and is a Certified Administrator of Public Parking(CAPP). Jim joined Walker Parking Consultants after a ten-year career as the Parking Division Manager with the City of Tampa where he managed a $17 million annual budget with one million dollars of capital improvement designation per annum. The City operates thirty off-street locations with 11,372 spaces and 1,700 on- street metered spaces. While with the City of Tampa,Jim managed three Parking Technology projects; On-street parking pay stations, Off-street parking access and revenue control system and Mobile payment platform. Jim represented the City throughout the evaluation of the technology and equipment and the selection of the preferred technology provider. Jim also represented the City throughout the installation and testing of the new technology and equipment. Since joining Walker,Jim has managed a series of the parking management studies in communities across Florida and the US. The following are a few examples of his recent projects: City of Fort Pierce Parking Management Study, Fort Pierce, FL Project Manager led the team that conducted a parking supply/demand study in Downtown and at the beach in Fort Pierce,evaluated alternatives to improve the availability of parking in these areas, provided recommendations to introduce on-street parking time limits in Downtown to encourage use of off-street parking,and,evaluated a financial feasibility of constructing a parking structure adjacent to the beach. City of Corpus Christi Downtown Parking Management Study,Corpus Christi,TX Project Manager led the team that conducted a Downtown parking study and developed a long-term parking strategy plan, integrating best management practices to serve as a framework for the parking operations and the implementation of enhancements to the parking program to stimulate economic development. City of Oshkosh Downtown Parking Management Study,Oshkosh,WI Project Consultant on the team that conducted a Downtown parking study resulting in a long-term parking strategy plan to better manage parking demand by identifying short and long-term parking requirements,re-brand the public parking system with a consumer-friendly sign package solution and developing a financial model to sustain the City's parking operations. Broward County Convention Center Expansion Study, Fort Lauderdale, FL Parking Consultant on the team that conducted a parking supply/demand study,projected future parking demand,and,evaluated alternatives to mitigate a 1,000-space reduction of on-site parking because of the partial demolition of the Northport parking garage. City of Homestead Parking Consulting Services, Homestead,FL Parking Manager led the team that updated the downtown parking supply/demand study to address recent changes in the supply of on and off-street parking and project future demand based on proposed developments in the City of Homestead. 97 Founded in 2010, Ecostrata Services builds on 26 years' experience in the private, government, and non-profit sectors to create solutions for our clients. Our primary service is geared to organizations facing shortages in their funding streams or that are looking for ways to grow their business. Ecostrata works to identify the client's needs first, rather than attempting to fit an available resource to that client, ensuring a focus geared to each client's unique needs. From grants, to government services, to general fundraising, Ecostrata is here to help you. President's bio Ecostrata's Founder and President, Robert Ruano has over 26 years of -- management experience, both in the private and public sector. His experience includes many years in City of Miami government, overseeing all grant applications and environmental initiatives. Among his accomplishments are a successful state grant that saved six acres ° of prime urban green space from development and the completion of a climate action plan that put the city on the path to sustainability. Since - founding founding Ecostrata Services in 2010, he has worked with nonprofits, municipalities and private entities looking for funding or access to government programs. He is familiar with local, state, federal and foundation grant programs in a variety of functional areas. Robert believes that community service is crucial to being a good corporate citizen, as such, he volunteers and chairs several community boards and volunteers at community events. Currently, he serves on the USDA's National Urban & Community Forestry Advisory Council, Miami Dade County's Planning Advisory Board, and Coral Gables Parks & Recreation Advisory Board. He is also a board member and was the Founding Chairman of Bike Walk Coral Gables and is a member of the Green Mobility Network. These organizations benefit from free advice, hours and dollars that help them help our own community. A win for everyone. Services Grants and Fundraising — Our staff has helped bring over S70 million dollars in funding to South Florida in the last 15 years. That is thanks to meticulous funding research, attention to detail, and highly competitive funding applications. Planning and research is essential to a process of securing new funding, but so are experience working with funders and understanding what makes them want to invest in your program. Whether working with a Foundation Chair or submitting an online grant application, we have the experience and knowledge to increase your award rate and bring you the dollars you need most. While we work on many types of grant applications, we specialize in capital projects for municipalities: parks, tree plantings, large equipment purchases, transportation infrastructure, and storm water projects. 98 Government Services - Dealing with the labyrinth that is government, at all levels, is made significantly easier when you know the people on the inside and understand what they are trying to accomplish. Ecostrata personnel have experience working with local, state and federal bureaucracies and can therefore achieve results that may elude others. When a client needs to negotiate an agreement or access unpublicized funding, they call us for assistance. Sponsorships - If you're organizing an event, call us first to assist with identifying and reaching out to businesses and foundations that might have an interest in supporting your cause. We have experience with trade shows, community events, festivals, and informal gatherings. Environmental Projects -While many organizations are looking to be green or sustainable, most are finding that it is difficult to choose the right steps that will achieve the best results. Likewise, while management may be on board, it takes committed employees and a culture that can embrace an environmentally friendly attitude. After helping craft many sustainability documents and ordinances in South Florida, our staff is uniquely qualified to assist your management team in getting truly 'green' results. Past Projects: Haiti hospital - $3 million dollars for the development and continued operation of a critical care hospital in downtown Port-Au-Prince. Funding came from national and international foundations. County contract - Assisted Large office-supply company in securing a multi-million dollar contract, providing all office supply needs to Miami Dade County departments. More Urban Parks - One of our specialties is getting funding to purchase land or renovate existing parks. In the last 3 years, we have helped create or improve five parks throughout our community. Urban trees -The trees in parks and in our public areas constitute our urban forestry. We have helped countless cities receive much needed funding to increase their tree canopy, thereby making the community more walkable and increasing property values. Town Hall energy retrofit - A full lighting retrofit of a municipal building, helping to save 10% of their energy bill while reducing carbon emissions. Ecostrata Services Principals: Robert Ruano — Has not contributed to Miami Beach elections Laura C. Tapia — Has not contributed to Miami Beach elections 99 Quality Counts TRANSPORTATION DATA Glenn Davis COLLECTION SERVICES Sr. Operations Manager(FL) Quality Counts. LLC—Fort Lauderdale, FL EXPERIENCE Mr. Davis is the main contact for all of Florida regarding all contracts and projects. He oversees each of the offices'daily operations and works directly with clients. Mr. Davis has managed numerous contracts including aggregate annual tube counts of more than 300 locations. In addition, he has managed several specialized projects where new approaches and dynamic methods were developed in order to complete tasks, specifically using video technology for TMC's and non-intrusive radar units for traffic monitoring. Mr. Davis is a graduate of Florida Atlantic University with a Bachelor's of Science degree in Business Management. Total Experience: 7.5 years/All with Quality Counts BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Mr. Davis is directly involved in business development for the Florida market in regards to expansion. This includes contacting prospective clientele, searching out potential public contracts. setting up meetings and conducting business presentations. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Mr. Davis is directly involved with all of QC's projects for the Florida offices and oversees all operations for the Florida market. This role includes experience in estimating. organizing, managing, and delivering all manner of projects for QC and works directly with field technicians and data reducers. Throughout Florida, QC currently employees four Field Technicians that perform the field tasks and nearly 40 video reduction staff that review and manually count all video, consisting of managers and counting technicians. PROJECT EXPERIENCE 1-95 Interchange PD&E Study (Broward County Interchanges)—FDOT District 4—2011.2012: The purpose of this study was to determine peak traffic and average daily travel for each interchange of 1-95 throughout Broward County, 17 in total. Quality Counts was subcontracted by URS to perform 72-hr volume approach counts at an average of four intersections per interchange. along with 8-hr TMCs for three consecutive days (through use of video) and two 72-hr classification counts per interchange. Data was collected for one full interchange per week. Contact: John Arrieta at 561-994-6500 1-95 Interchange PD&E Study (Palm Beach County Interchanges)—FDOT District 4—2012-2013: The purpose of this study was to determine peak traffic and average daily travel for each interchange of 1-95 throughout Palm Beach County. 17 in total. Quality Counts was subcontracted by Kittelson to perform 24-hr volume approach counts at an average of four intersections per interchange, along with AM and PM Peak TMCs (through use of video) and two 24-hr classification counts per interchange. Data was collected for two full interchanges per week. Contact: Thuha Lyew at 954-560-5251 SR 739 Design and PD&E Re-Evaluation—FDOT District 1 —2013: The project includes the design and PD&E re-evaluation for the widening of US 98 from a four-lane to six-lane roadway, as well as upgrades. Quality Counts was subcontracted by CES to conduct all data collection consisting of 8-hr midweek TMC at(75)total intersections(with 24-hr approach counts at 33 locations), 7-day classification counts at three(3)locations.All data collected within two weeks. Contact: Chad Rohde at 407-423-1600 Quincy Loop Origin-Destination Study—FDOT District 3—2014: Quality Counts was subcontracted by Stantec to perform the data collection need for the Quincy Loop study in Quincy. FL. The task required 6-hr origin-destination studies for 10 different checkpoints and ten (10)24-hr classification counts. The study was performed using HD cameras and license-plate matching was performed. Contact: Matthew Crim at 832-523-9111 Quality Counts, LLC Page 1 Glenn Davis,2017 100 US 98 from Edgewood Drive to Main Street-Polk County, FL—FDOT District 1—May 2012: The project includes the design and PD&E re-evaluation for the widening of US 98 from a four-lane to six-lane roadway, as well as upgrades to the signing and markings, signals, lighting and median openings. Quality Counts was subcontracted by CES to conduct all data collection needed to perform these tasks, which consisted of 8-hr midweek TMC at thirty (30) total intersections (with 24-hr approach counts at ten (10) signalized intersections), 4-hr weekend TMC at four (4) total intersections, 7-day classification counts at four(4)locations, and 24-hr speed counts at three(3) locations. Most data was collected within one week. Contact: Chad Rohde at 407-423-1600 Bluetooth Before&After Travel Time Study—MetroPlan Orlando—2014 to Present: The purpose of the study was to measure travel time&signal validation data with Bluetooth readers before and after signal retiming was performed along particular corridors throughout Orlando, including Seminole, Orange, and Osceola Counties. Quality Counts was subconsulted by Kittelson & Associates and the task consists of performing data collection on nearly 30 road segments per year. The study is completed in phases, with each segment being monitored for 3 days. Contact: Ryan Cunningham at 407-540- 0555 Amtrak Auto Train Data Collection—FDOT District 5—2012: Quality Counts had been subcontracted through Kittelson & Associates, Inc to collect data collection for a study involving the Amtrak Auto Train wash station for FDOT District 5. The study involved several peak hour TMCs and 48-hr classification counts throughout the station area,but also required a special count task.QC was asked to film a stretch of track on each side of the wash station and provide counts of pedestrians crossing the tracks between train cars. QC provided data to show the number of pedestrians crossing, approximately where they crossed, and the time that they crossed while the Auto Train is present. Contact: Adam Burghdoff at 407-540-0555 Coral Ridge Country Club Neighborhood Mobility Masterplan—City of Fort Lauderdale—January 2015 The purpose of this study was to address transportation, mobility,and access issues throughout the neighborhood. Quality Counts was subcontracted by Kittelson &Associates, Inc.to perform 6-hr TMC for two consecutive days at twenty-five(25)intersections throughout the neighborhood. In addition, QC performed six(6) pedestrian and bike crossing counts for 6 hours on a midweek day and 3 hours on a weekend day. Lastly,QC performed twenty-seven (27)48-hr speed counts throughout the neighborhood. Contact:Jessica Josselyn at 954-653-5622 2016 Highlands County Annual Traffic Program—Highlands County—May 2015 Quality Counts was subcontracted by the Highlands County to perform 24-hr volume, speed, and classification counts for 197 locations around throughout the county. All counts had to be completed within the month of May to be collected within the school schedule.Quality Counts also performed the annual count program from 2007-2010. Contact: Kenya Anderson at 863-402-6877 Glades Road Interchange PD&E Study—FDOT District 4—September 2015: The purpose of this study was to determine peak traffic, average daily travel, and trip generation for the Glades Road interchange for I-95 in Boca Raton, FL. Quality Counts was subcontracted by URS/AECOM to perform AM and PM Peak turning movement counts for three consecutive days (through use of video) at thirteen (13) intersections along the Glades corridor and adjacent side streets. In addition, QC was tasked with collecting Bluetooth data collection to determine origin-destination information for 6 identified origins. Data was collected for over a two-week span.Contact:John Arrieta at 561-994-6500 Brevard County Annual Traffic Data Collection—Space Coast TPO—2015 to Present: Quality Counts was awarded the annual count program for Brevard County by the Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization.The task consists of collecting 48-hr vehicle counts at up to 500 locations per year.The project requires the collection of certain groups of counts during particular time periods throughout the Fall and Winter of each year. The project also requires the delivery of custom reports, both electronic files as well as hard copies. Contact: Laura Carter at 321-690-6890 Andrews Ave and East 3rd Ave Traffic Data Collection—City of Fort Lauderdale—November 2013: This data collection effort was necessary to analyze Andrews and East 3rd Avenues in Downtown Fort Lauderdale. Using this information,expected roadway, intersection,and multimodal(encompassing bicycles, pedestrians, and transit)operating levels of service were to be established. Quality Counts was subcontracted by the City of Fort Lauderdale to perform AM, mid-day, and PM peak hour TMC data(encompassing vehicles, pedestrians,and bicycles)on a typical weekday at twenty-one(21)intersections as well as ten(10)72-hour machine counts throughout the study area. Contact: Heslop Daley at 954-828-5734 Quality Counts,LLC Page 2 Glenn Davis,2017 101 RESUME I Susan Black,JD Susan Black JD Years of Experlenoe: Transit Planning/Grant Writing Susan Black,JD, MPA,is a Senior Program Manager who joined Lochner in 2016 and Education: has diverse public and private-sector experience in Program Management, • Bachelor of Arts in Organizational Development and Planning,Performance Management,Risk Communication/Journalism,Florida Management,and Team Management with a focus in process and system design, State University,Tallahassee,FL 1986 policy development,and strategic planning and implementation. • Masters of Science in Public Administration,University of Central Florida,Orlando,FL 1992 While serving as the LYNX General Manager,Susan was directly responsible for all • Juris Doctorate,University of Florida administrative functions,including:Planning and Development,Grants& College of Law,Gainesville,FL 1996 Procurement,Engineering&Construction,Risk Management, Labor Relations/Human Resources, Marketing&Communication,and Information Professional Registration: Technology. • Lawyer:FL#89273 Susan's specific project experience includes development and implementation of Areas of Expertise: the multi-year strategic plan for Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority • Public Opinion Surveying (LYNX),executive involvement in the Transportation Development Planning(TDP) • Transit Planning/Design process,as well as other public transit service delivery planning;facilitation and • FTA Analysis/Study Documentation coordination of multi-jurisdictional workshops focused on building inter-agency • Stakeholder Facilitation • Local Municipality Coordination collaboration to achieve Central Florida's regional transportation goals; . public Meeting Coordination Development and delivery of transit/transportation presentations to business • Stakeholder Committee Group leaders,public officials and other regional stakeholder groups. Susan is proud to Coordination have had the opportunity to build and maintain strong professional relationships • Transportation Planning with Central Florida's public transportation leadership teams. • Project Management • Inter-Agency Coordination PROJECT EXPERIENCE • State/Federal Funding Procedure Compliance SWFWMD General Engineering Services 20142019;Tampa,FL • Public-Private Partnership(P3) Owner:Southwest Florida Water Management District Delivery Supervisor(Task Mgr.) 1 2015-2019 • Business Planning Peer review of design plans for a 50-acre stormwater detention pond.Responsible • Public and Media Outreach Material for: Development • Performs Project Management Office(PMO)Assessment,Analysis and • Urban Planning Recommendations • Public Involvement • Long Range Planning • Program Management Tampa Bay Premium Transit Feasibility Study;Hillsborough County,FL • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) Owner:Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Planning/Design Supervisor(Task Mgr.) I 2016-2018 • Feasibility Studies Responsible for: • Management Consulting • Performs research/analysis regarding quantification methodologies for • Transit Station Planning/Design economic impact of premium transit systems • High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV)Facility Planning/Design • Grant Administration PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS General Manager/Interim CEO Central Florida Regional Transportation Authority(LYNX),Orlando,FL May 2014—June 2016 • Leadership through Transition: • Provided strong executive leadership during a period of leadership transition • Effectively managed the LYNX public transit system:$120 million annual operating budget,3 facilities locations,300 vehicles and 75 routes serving over 100,000 riders daily across 2,500 sq.mi.,with over 4,500 bus stops/shelters within the tri-county service area LOCHNER 102 RESUME Susan Black, Ii) • Consistently met and exceeded expectations of Federal,State and local funding-partners while delivering multiple complex transit initiatives(e.g.:design&construction of new Bus Rapid Transit,Public/Private Partnership for a new Compressed Natural Gas Facility,among others) • Successfully led project teams through highly visible and politically sensitive organizational evolutions such as multi-party transit-related projects, labor union contract negotiations,complex pension arbitrations,and employee healthcare plan migration • Enhanced organizational credibility through forging community partner relationships,setting high performance expectations,and increasing transparency through providing clear and accurate information to stakeholders • Significant Increase in Organizational Efficiency&Effectiveness: • Developed and recommended principle-based policy/procedural modifications to align resource deployment with organizational priorities • Achieved measurably increased cross-functional coherence through implementation of recommended SOP modifications • Strengthened organizational infrastructure by conducting needs assessments,functional analyses and implementing action plans for all administrative departments, including Human Resource Management& P g Training,Engineering&Construction, Facilities Maintenance,Planning&Development/Grants,Marketing &Communication,Customer Service; Risk Management Security&Safety,Information Technology, Business Development&Advertising • Established Highly Successful Risk Mitigation Programs: • Executive-level decision-making for all types of disputes,including complex contracts, labor and employment,general liability,workers'compensation,among others • Served as management representative in dispute resolution processes,including internal grievance process, non-binding mediation,binding arbitration and litigation • Strong Labor Relations/Labor Contract Negotiations: • Represented LYNX management in all collective bargaining/contract negotiations with Labor Unions[ATU 1749 Transit Supervisors,ATU 1596 Transit Operators&Mechanics] • Increased procedural oversight of management's investigation &disciplinary process • Introduced and implemented principle-based grievance hearing process Tri-Sector Leadership Consultant,Orlando,FL October 2009—June 2015 Provided professional advisory and consulting services for regional agencies and organizations in the public,independent, and private sectors. • Strategic Advocacy • Organizational,divisional&individual goal-setting&achievement • Strategic plan implementation,activity tracking,monitoring&trending • Organizational Development • Policy Review,Revamp&Formulation,including Risk Management,Marketing&Communication,Human Resources,Executive/Administration • Procedural Analysis and Restructuring Recommendations • Performance Management • Process Design&Development • Policy&Procedure Development&Restructuring • Performance Management Implementation:Establishing Best Practices • Individual Strategic Planning for the Executive Suite • Performance Management Process&Methods Support • Curriculum Design&Delivery:Professional Development&Continuing Education • Leadership Skills,Effective Performance Evaluation Processes,Effective Business Communication Techniques,Workplace Diversity&Impact on Business Communication,Applied Principles of Project Management,Remaining Relevant in the Marketplace/Workplace,ROI in the Public Sector:Measuring& Rewarding Performance,Communicating Through Crisis,Navigating Organizational Change,Strategic Planning LOCHNER 103 RES(IMF I Lara Bouck, Pt,AICP 1 Lara Bouck P E, AICP Years of E>cerlenae: 13 Senior Planner Lara Bouck is a Senior Planner in Lochner's Southeast region.She joined the firm in Education: 2014 with 10 years'experience in transportation and transit planning. Ms.Bouck is • Bachelor of Science in Materials an experienced planner and project manager,who has been a key player in a Science and Engineering, number of large-scale projects and completed a diverse range of planning activities Northwestern University,Evanston,IL for private, municipal,regional,and state-level clients.Her expertise encompasses 2002 feasibility and corridor studies,project development and environment(PD&E) • Masters of Science in Urban and studies,capital cost development,social and cultural impact analyses,public Regional Planning,Florida State University,Tallahassee,FL 2004 involvement techniques,and the preparation of FTA and NEPA documentation.She has had notable involvement in transit planning initiatives related to rail Proms Registration: (commuter, light,and freight),bus rapid transit,intercity bus service,and regional • Professional Engineer:FL#70129 intermodal systems,as well as for trails and other pedestrian/non-motorized facilities.She has also worked on numerous transportation-and traffic-focused Affiliations: planning projects,ranging from city center master plans to PD&E studies for • American Planning Association interstate improvements. • Women's Transportation Seminar PROJECT EXPERIENCE Certifications: • American Institute of Certified 1-75 Regional Corridor Transportation Use Evaluation;Multiple Counties,FL Planners Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2011-2016 Areas of se: Lochner conducted a regional corridor transportation use evaluation for • Feasibility Studies consideration of transit options along the 1-75 Corridor,from Wesley Chapel in • Corridor Studies Pasco County to the north to the Bradenton/Palmetto area in Manatee County to • Public Meeting Coordination the south.Additional considerations included assessing various mobility options for • RFP/RFQ Development/Administration the connection from Brandon to downtown Tampa in Hillsborough County. • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design Responsible for: • Grant writing • Categorical Exclusion Documentation • Overseeing client coordination,scope development and completion of all • Public and Media Outreach Material tasks under the Task Work Order based contract Development • Environmental Assessments 15th Street East/301 Boulevard East PD&E Study;Manatee County,FL • Transportation Planning Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 1 • Alternative Development and Analysis Senior Planner 1 2013-2017 • Project Management PD&E study for the widening of 4.5 miles of 15th Street East/301 Boulevard East • Public Involvement from two to three lanes,and the construction of associated Complete Streets • Transit Planning/Design elements,such as bicycle lanes,sidewalks,pedestrian crossings,street lighting,and • Project Development and Environment roundabouts,as well as transit improvements. Impacts to a historic district,historic (PD&E)Studies cemetery,and creek are key concerns,as are potential contamination issues from • NEPA Documentation petroleum and hazardous waste sites.Responsible for: • Proposal Development • Serving as primary author for the Design Traffic Technical Memorandum • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) and Roundabout Evaluation Technical Memorandum Planning/Design • FTA Analysis/Study Documentation • Compiling and synthesizing technical information from team traffic • Trail Planning/Design engineers and roundabout experts • GIS Analysis/Mapping • Data Collection Alt US 19-SR 595 Corridor Study II from Belleair Rd to Pinellas-Pasco County Line; Pinellas,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2016-2018 Lochner is conducting a study analysis of travel related problems, needs and issues along the SR 595/Alt 19 corridor from Belleair Rd to the Pinellas/Pasco County line for FDOT District 7.This project involves a corridor study(pre-PD&E)to evaluate the need for multimodal transportation improvement along a congested regional transportation corridor. Lochner is tasked with identifying the cause and characteristics of the corridor's transportation issues.This may include capacity issues,traffic operations,safety,access and egress,freight movements,transit,bicycles,and pedestrian movements.Lochner is also tasked with identifying both current US 19 corridor travel conditions and needs and forecasted travel characteristics and needs LOCHNER 104 LI Lard i,um.K, PE,;‘,ICP while also developing potential workable and implementable solutions for travel needs.Testing of alternatives for potential improvements may also be involved. Responsible for: • Leading coordination and oversight of the Public Involvement Program.An extensive public outreach and involvement program is planned as a part of this planning-level study in order to fully identify stakeholder needs and goals as they relate to the project. Tampa Bay Premium Transit Feasibility Study;Hillsborough County,FL Client:Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Project Manager I 2016-2018 Missing brief resume description Responsible for: • Performing peer review and providing input to the Prime Consultant during the Phase One Screening • Performing ROI analysis during Phase Two Screening PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS US.192 Corridor Alternatives Analysis,LYNX Served as Transportation Planner for this project to study transit and transportation options on U.S.Highway 192—the busiest roadway corridor supporting traffic leading into Walt Disney World.The goal of the LYNX U.S. 192 AA project is to determine the best ways to improve mobility,community connectivity to SunRail,and economic development along the corridor.The approach to the study is to provide more transportation choices,support sustainable housing,and enhance the economy and existing communities through coordinated policies across multiple government entities.Major responsibilities included compilations of the existing conditions reports,significant contributions to the alternatives analysis documentation, and coordination of public involvement activities. Strategic Regional Transit Needs Assessment,FDOT District Seven This project consisted of a two-year study of the regional transit infrastructure needs in an eight-county area:Citrus, Hernando,Hillsborough,Manatee,Pasco,Pinellas,Polk,and Sarasota.The project included development of transit performance criteria for use by FDOT in determining how to create a regionally balanced system while maximizing resources and opportunities for funding transit services in the Tampa Bay region. Responsibilities included completion of the market trends analysis associated with this project. SunRail Commuter Rail Service—FDOT District 5 Assisted with development of the Request for Proposal(RFP)documentation to assist the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)in advertising for and engaging a third-party operations and maintenance contractor of the new SunRail project,which will introduce commuter rail to central Florida. Recipient of federal funds,this project is now under phased construction for the first 31 miles.Ultimately,the SunRail commuter rail will extend 61 miles and include 16 stations to serve communities from DeLand to Kissimmee in rapidly evolving central Florida. Green Line Light Rail Service Extension,MassDOT/MBTA This project's first phase involved an alternatives analysis of various modes(commuter rail,light rail,bus rapid transit,and TSM)and options for providing enhanced transit services in the study area.This was followed by planning/engineering services for the proposed light rail extension and involved alternatives analysis,and evaluation of the environmental impacts of various alignments.It included development of a DEIR/EA,civil engineering,transportation planning,environmental permitting services,a robust public involvement program,and submission of the FTA New Starts Application.Major responsibilities included preparing the Project Management Plan,and compiling required New Starts materials for submittal to the FTA. Lee County Transit Administration,Operations&Maintenance Fadlity,LeeTran This project consisted of assisting Lee County Public Works and Transit(LeeTran)with planning,design and construction of a new transit administration,operations and maintenance facility. Phase One included a site search,evaluation,selection and acquisition,as well as ongoing coordination with FTA and FDOT.The second phase included project development analysis that complies with FTA and NEPA requirements,including public outreach and the publication of an Environmental Assessment.The project received a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI)from the FTA in 2006.Major responsibilities on this project included public outreach,GIS mapping and analysis in support of the site evaluation process,and document production. LOCHNER 105 RESUME I David Freni, PE David Freni, PE 25arsofEver'd'ce: Roadway Design Engineer Mr. Freni is a Senior Highway Design Engineer with civil engineering experience Education: predominantly within the field of transportation.He joined Lochner in 2009. • Bachelor of Science in Civil Mr.Freni has considerable experience—as an engineer and manager—with Engineering,University of Florida 1992 roadway and drainage design projects,including design-builds. He has led design for Registrat the new construction,reconstruction,and/or rehabilitation of city streets, Professional ' intersections, urban and rural arterials,expressways,interchanges,and multi-use • Professional Engineer:FL#51367 trails.His roadway design expertise includes geometric design,traffic control Certifications: planning,specification development,environmental permitting,and construction • Advanced Maintenance of Traffic staging.As a Project Manager,he has successfully headed large,multi-disciplinary Qualification projects requiring coordination with numerous subconsultant firms.He has worked • Qualified Stormwater Management with clients ranging from state Departments of Transportation to regional economic inspector development alliances to counties, municipalities,and private developers. In addition to roadway engineering, Mr. Freni has worked in the fields of site Areas of Expertise: development design and geotechnical engineering. • Highway/Roadway Design PROJECT EXPERIENCE CR 388(West Bay Parkway)PD&E Study;Bay&Walton Counties,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 3 Design Manager,Principal-in-Charge I 2008-2019 Project development and environment study for 24 miles of improvements on CR 388,comprising a section of realignment (Segment 1)and a section of widening(Segment 2). Preparation of an environmental impact statement for Segment 1 and an environmental assessment for Segment 2.Responsible for: • Managing client coordination • Assisting with PD&E Study • Coordinating with client,subconsultants,and review agencies • Preparing typical sections,corridor alternatives,cost estimates,schedules,and reports US 17,CR 309 to Dunns Creek Bridge;Putnam County,FL Client:FDOT-District 2 Principal-in-Charge I 2007-2017 New roadway multilane reconstruction design to establish horizontal and vertical alignments,set right of way requirements, prepare right of way documents,and identify project costs and potential impacts. Responsible for: • Managing client coordination CR 388 PDE Study-West Bay County;Bay County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 3 Project Manager I 2008-2019 Responsible for: • Assisting with PD&E Study • Coordinating with client,subconsultants,and review agencies • Preparing typical sections,corridor alternatives,cost estimates,schedules,and reports CR 388 PD&E Study-East Bay County;Bay County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 3 Principal-in-Charge I 2008-2015 Responsible for: • Managing client coordination Starke Bypass,SR 200-US 301 to North of SR 100;Bradford County,FL Client:FDOT-District 2 Principal-in-Charge 1 2010-2018 LOCHNER 106 ki SLiME I)nwid I rein, PE Roadway, interchange,drainage,and structural design for three miles of controlled-access roadway on new alignment,with numerous alignment constraints, including wetlands,a historic cemetery,a railroad crossing,and a wastewater treatment spray field.Responsible for: • Managing client coordination • Performing Quality Control SR 61(US 319)Rehabilitation,Timberwolf Crossing to Georgia State Line;Leon County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 3 Project Manager I 2009-2013 Design services for the rehabilitation of 8.5 miles of four-lane divided rural section on a designated hurricane evacuation route.Responsible for: • Serving as Engineer of Record Tallahassee Sidewalks Group B;Tallahassee/Leon County,FL Client:City of Tallahassee Project Manager I 2010-2012 This project consists of designing five new sidewalks along existing City Streets to provide pedestrians with access to bus stops along the City's new bus routes. Responsible for: • Managing client coordination • Performing Quality Control Design Group 12-04-SR 10 and SR 261;Tallahassee,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 3 Project Manager I 2011-2013 Preparation of plans,specifications,and estimates for two 3R projects in Tallahassee, Florida:2.3 miles of SR 10 and 2.7 miles of SR 261.Lochner's design will resurface all travel lanes,auxiliary lanes,and paved shoulders on both routes,as well as median crossovers.Any necessary ADA improvements within the project bounds will also be included in the plans. Responsible for: • Serving as Engineer of Record Sidewalks-Bradford Road and Lonnbladh Road;Tallahassee,FL Client:City of Tallahassee Project Manager I 2011-2015 This project consisted of designing new sidewalks along two existing residential city streets to provide connectivity and ADA access within the neighborhoods.Responsible for: • Serving as Engineer of Record Natural Bridge Road and SR 20 Bridge Replacements;Leon County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 3 Principal-in-Charge I 2009-2016 Design of two bridge replacements in ecologically sensitive areas, requiring context-sensitive design:a a 125-foot-long,four- span flat slab bridge with a concrete deck,stamped and painted to resemble wooden planking,and a 107-foot-long,single- span AASHTO girder structure.Responsible for: • Managing client coordination • Performing Quality Control Lonnbladh Road Drainage;Tallahassee,FL Client:City of Tallahassee Principal-in-Charge 1 2010-2013 Drainage analysis,design,and permitting for a new two-acre stormwater pond as part of the City of Tallahassee's upgrades to Lonnbladh Road.Responsible for: • Managing client coordination • Performing Quality Control LOCHNER 107 y !. RESUME I Jason Green,AICP Jason Green, AICP Years of Experience: 15 Complete Streets Planner Mr.Green has a diverse background in urban and regional planning, project Education: management,FTA program management,NEPA implementation,and public • Masters of Science in Urban Planning, involvement.His areas of expertise include FTA programs and guidance,alternative University of Utah 2008 development and analysis,existing conditions analysis,cultural and socioeconomic • Bachelor of Science in Urban Planning, resource evaluation,environmental and land use compliance,and public University of Utah 2004 involvement management.Mr.Green is experienced in managing FTA programs • Bachelor of Science in Anthropology, and developing materials that disseminate FTA circulars and guidance to educate University of Tennessee 1998 and ensure compliance with federal law.In addition,he is experienced in all levels Affillatlons: of NEPA compliance and documentation. He has assisted in leading regional land • American Planning Association use and transportation visioning efforts,and has worked closely with municipalities • American Public Transportation throughout the state on a variety of land use and transportation issues and Association opportunities.Mr.Green has also been instrumental in expanding Lochner's transit • women's Transportation Seminar program, including leading the development of a company-wide transit initiative business plan. Certi ications: • American Institute of Certified PROJECT EXPERIENCE Planners Pleasant Grove Bicycle Master Plan Study Pleasant Grove,UT Areas of : Client:Mountainland Association of Governments • NEPA Documentation Project Manager I 2012-2013 • Program Management Project management,bike/pedestrian facility planning,and public involvement • Grant Administration services for development of comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Master • Transportation Planning Plan for the City of Pleasant Grove. Responsible for: • Long Range Planning • Managing all elements of the project including scope,schedule,and • Environmental Planning budget Managing the draft and final document preparation • Environmental Assessments • Categorical Exclusion Documentation • Transit Planning/Design Provo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit Alternatives Analysis&Environmental Assessment; . public involvement Utah County,UT • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) Client:Utah Transit Authority Planning/Design Planner 12007 2016 • Stakeholder Facilitation Preparation of an FTA alternatives analysis,an environmental assessment,and • Corridor Studies conceptual engineering services for a multimodal project,including an 11-mile bus • Feasibility Studies rapid transit(BRT)system with more than 5 miles of exclusive BRT lanes,as well as a • FTA Analysis/Study Documentation new high-occupancy vehicle/toll(HOT) interchange. Responsible for: • Land Use Planning • Authoring the public safety,land use, minerals,and cumulative assessment • Project Management document sections • RFP/RFQ Development/Administration • Assisting in the development and completion of a TIGER grant • Urban Planning • Permit Acquisition/Coordination UTA Network Transit Study;Statewide,UT • Local Municipality Coordination Client:Utah Transit Authority • Grant Writing • Inter-Agency Coordination Transportation Planner I 2011-2014 • Public and Media Outreach Material Lead transit planning services for study to identify next tier of capital projects, Development focused on capital investment for expanded BRT service throughout the Salt Lake Valley,and potential operations strategies for UTA to focus on delivering after completion of the Frontlines 2015 program.Services include management oversight,data collection/research,stakeholder coordination,and final corridor identification. Responsible for: • Overseeing the development of creating a guidance manual and checklist for cities to plan for transit • Coordinating with UTA to create a transit preparedness index UDOT Transit Planning On-Call Services;Statewide,UT Client:Utah Department of Transportation Project Manager I 2010-2011 Support for UDOT's Public Transit Team in managing various projects,including coordination with agencies and grant LOCHNER 108 RE SIJRIE ()men, ;AKA' 2 recipients around the state to identify projects eligible for FTA funding,and program management for the 5311(f)—Intercity Bus,5316—Job Access Reverse Commute,and 5317—New Freedom programs.Responsible for: • Assisting in the development of guidelines for subrecipients regarding FTA and UDOT transit processes and in the development of RFPs for UDOT transit programs • Authoring guidelines to assist in streamlining FTA grant procedures and processes for UDOT transit team and sub recipients Complete Street Policy Workshops;Ogden,Bluffdale,Centerville,UT Client:Wasatch Front Regional Council Program Manager 1 2014-2015 Coordination,facilitation,and development of materials for three two-day workshops as part of a pilot program to assist municipalities to incorporate Complete Streets policies into their planning processes.Responsible for:In cooperation with the Wasatch Front Regional Council,developed a Complete Streets Policy Workshop pilot program.To date 3 cities have completed the program resulting in a draft policy to be taken up by the city councils for adoption and implementation.The workshops include 3-2 hour sessions discussing complete streets 101,policy elements,vision,funding,policies and procedures and draft review.Attendees include council members and department heads. Nine-Line Corridor Implementation Plan(SLC Trans Valley Connector);Salt Lake County,UT Client:Alta Planning&Design Project Manager 1 2016-2017 As a subcontractor to Alta Planning and Design provided the public involvement staff and materials,preliminary design,and costs. Bear Lake Seasonal Planning Study;Rich County,UT Client: Fehr&Peers Transportation Consultants Environmental Planner 1 2015-2016 Stakeholder coordination,conceptual design,agency coordination,and initial NEPA processes as part of an intermediate- level corridor study to address seasonal safety and congestion issues on two tourists routes.Responsible for: • Conducting high level fatal flaw analysis • Reviewing and documented all Bear Lake management guidance • Drafting preliminary purpose and need for each identified project • Creating 1-page summary for each project 1-90 Corridor Improvement Study;Kootenai County,ID Client: Idaho Transportation Department Environmental Planner 1 2015-2017 Corridor study along 15 miles of Interstate,including 10 interchanges and many bridges,with focus on alleviation of congestion through increased capacity.Responsible for: • Providing environmental fatal flaw analysis for the 1-90 Interchange Study South Salt Lake Complete Streets Policy Workshop;South Salt Lake,UT Client:IBI Group Project Manager 1 2015-2015 Delivery of three-session workshop to enable the municipality to incorporate a Complete Streets policy into its downtown redevelopment plan.Responsible for: • Providing a 6-hour Complete Streets workshop to the City of South Salt Lake,which included:introduction of Complete Streets;facilitation of what changes would need to be made to city policies to ensure effective implementation,and documentation of a draft Complete Streets policy Taylorsville-Murray BRT Environmental Study;Salt Lake County,UT Client:Stanley Consultants,Inc. Environmental Specialist 1 2012-2013 Preparation of Environmental Study Report and preliminary design for 4-mile bus rapid transit(BRT)system through Taylorsville and Murray,connecting the 5300 South intermodal center with Salt Lake Community College.Responsible for: • Documenting purpose and need, land use,and socio economic sections LOCHNER 109 RESUME I Alejandro Jaureguy, PE Alejandro JaureguyYears of ce:, PE 15 Roadway Design Engineer Alejandro Jaureguy is a Senior Project Engineer in Lochner's Miami office.He joined Education: Lochner in 2014 bringing with him 12 years of experience in project management • Bachelor of Science in Civil and highway design.Mr.Juareguy's project management experience includes Engineering,FIU, Miami,FL 2006 managing multiple clients,plans production,maintenance of traffic,signing& pavement marking,utility relocation,cost estimating,quality assurance/quality Professional Registration: control(QA/CK)reviews with numerous state agencies, municipalities,and private ' Professional Engineer:FL#73773 sector clients.Responsibilities on past projects included design of roadway, Certifications: signalization and drainage improvements.He has also supervised a team of • Maintenance of Traffic,Advanced engineers and led multidisciplinary coordination with several teams to complete quality projects on schedule and under budget. Mr.Juareguy is also experienced in Areas ofExe: roadway geometric interchange design,open road tolling design and performing • Roundabout Intersection Design technical reviews of roadway and signing and pavement marking design for the • Highway/Roadway Design Florida Department of Transportation(Florida's Turnpike Enterprise)and the • Pedestrian Crossing Design(At-Grade) Miami-Dade Expressway Authority(MDX). • Railroad Crossing Design(At-Grade) • Construction Phasing Plan Development PROJECT EXPERIENCE • ADA Facility Evaluation/Design SR 70(Okeechobee Road)and Jenkins Road Intersection Improvements;St.Lucie • Field Engineering and Inspection County,FL • Project Management Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 4 • Signal Design Project Engineer I 2012-2017 • Specification Development Design of intersection improvements,including the addition of through lanes and • Permit Acquisition/Coordination turn lanes to improve intersection capacity.Responsible for: • Railroad Coordination • Utility Coordination • Performing production and coordination with multiple disciplines for 1.5 • Median U Turn Intersection Design miles roadway improvements,which include the addition of through lanes • Toll Facility Planning/Design and turn lanes to improve intersection capacity . Interchange Design • Signing Design 1-95(SR 9A)SB Rehabilitation,103rd Street to 125th Street;Miami-Dade County,FL • Right of Way Acquisition Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 • Digital Terrain Modeling Project Engineer I 2013-2015 • Existing Conditions Analysis Design services for rigid pavement replacement along 1.3 miles of six-lane • Tight Diamond Interchange Design (southbound)interstate,as well as the asphalt milling and resurfacing of the • Guardrail and Safety Barrier Design mainline shoulders and three ramps.Responsible for: • Design Exception Request/Approval • Performing production of Rigid Pavement Restoration of 1-95 NB lanes • Maintenance-of-Traffic(MOT)Plan from 103rd Street to Biscayne River Canal and minor highway design,and Development signing and pavement markings • Intersection Analysis/Design • Design-Build Delivery Hooker Highway 3R Design;Palm Beach County,FL • Diamond Interchange Design • Stormwater/Pavement Drainage Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 4 Design Project Engineer I 2012-2015 • Local Municipality Coordination Design services for the milling, resurfacing,and minor widening of one mile of two- • Reversible Lane Design lane undivided urban minor arterial.Responsible for: • Computer-Aided Design&Drafting • Production of Milling and Resurfacing (CADD) • Shoulder Widening • ADA features updates • Signalization • Signing and Pavement Markings SR5_Oveerseas Highway from MM 48 to MM 49;Monroe County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 Project Engineer I 2013-2015 Design of a 3R project for one mile of the highway in the environmentally sensitive Florida Keys.Responsible for: LOCHNER 110 RESUME I Al.rwrldiro Iaurogoy, PE • Production of Milling and Resurfacing,Shoulder Widening,ADA features updates,Signalization and Signing and Pavement Markings SR 968(Flagler Street)Rehabilitation,West of 69th Avenue to West of SR 9;Miami-Dade County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 Supervisor(Task Mgr.) I 2014-2024 Design for the resurfacing of 4.3 miles of four-lane roadway,as well as the closure of 11 unused driveways,the addition of 19 pedestrian refuge islands,and the upgrade of curb ramps to meet current ADA requirements.Responsible for: • Overall plans production • RRR project consist of the milling and resurfacing of Flagler Street as well as ADA and miscellaneous drainage improvements SR 907(Alton Road)Reconstruction,43rd Street to East of Allison Road;Miami Beach,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 Supervisor(Task Mgr.),Project Engineer I 2014-2024 Design services for the complete reconstruction of a 2.8-mile stretch of four-lane divided roadway in a dense urban area, including for the first time in Florida,the installation an entirely new roadway drainage system specifically designed to address rising sea levels. Responsible for: • Overall plans production-Project consist of the reconstruction of Alron Road,four lanes divided urban road SR5_Biscayne Blvd Pedestrian Crosswalks-MiMo Project-Seven Crossing Miami-Dade County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 Project Engineer I 2013-2015 Design services for six new midblock pedestrian crossings,each with flashing beacons and push buttons,and a new crosswalk on one leg of an urban intersection.Responsible for: • Overall plans production • Project consists of the design of raised pedestrian mid-block crossing islands at 6 locations,the design of two raised medians at locations of current striped median,and ADA improvements SR 953-LeJeune Road at Bird Road,Intersection Improvements;Miami-Dade County,R Client:TRACE Consultants,Inc. Supervisor(Task Mgr.) 1 2014-2019 Design services for drainage,misc structures,signalization and lighting components Responsible for: • Overseeing and coordinating the production and QC/QA of the project SR 826-Seg.1,Palmetto Expwy from 1-75 to N Canal C-8 Bridge;Miami-Dade County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 6 Supervisor(Task Mgr.) I 2016-2021 The primary purpose of this project is to relieve congestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity,enhance safety by addressing operation,structural and functional deficiencies and provide additional travel options. These improvements consist of the addition of express lanes,auxiliary lanes,reconstruction of the mainline and improvements to the existing interchanges.Responsible for: • Production,coordination and preparation of contract documents for the Reconstruction of SR 826 from 175 to Canal C8 SR-9 1-95 at Sunrise Blvd.Interchange Improvement;Broward County,R Client:Florida Department of Transportation,District 4 Project Engineer I 2017-2019 This interchange improvement project involves the following proposed improvements.Widen the Sunrise Blvd.Bridge over I- 95 EB and WB to provide enough receiving width for triple left turn lanes from SBI-95 off-ramp.Widening SB off-ramp to provide triple right turn lanes and triple left turn lanes. Add a right turn lane on EB Sunrise Blvd.to SB 1-95 on ramp.Other Improvements include milling and resurfacing,curb and gutter,upgrading lighting,traffic signals,pedestrian facilities and signing and pavement markings.Responsible for: • Overseeing the production and coordination efforts for all tasks related to this project included but not limited to Roadway,Drainage,S&P,Signalization,Lighting Structures • Coordinating with the ongoing 1-95 Managed Lane DB project L O C H N E R ��� RESUME I Brad Lucas,PF, P 1 Brad Lucas PE PTOE Years of Experience: 24 Traffic Engineer/ITS Mr. Lucas has extensive experience managing and designing projects for Education: numerous state and local governments.He is an expert in roadway,freeway, • Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, signing,striping,traffic control and intersection design,including signals, University of Utah,Salt Lake City,UT 1996 roundabouts,CFIs, limited access,SPUIs,and diamond interchanges.He is also proficient in alternative development and analysis,and traffic analysis and Professional : simulation.Mr.Lucas has successfully completed quality designs for over 50 • Professional Engineer:UT#318782 signalized intersections.He is well-versed in UDOT,AASHTO,and MUTCD Affiliations: standards and has gained extensive experience in conducting alternatives • Institute of Transportation Engineers analysis,designing local street improvements and intersections,and developing multi-phase maintenance-of-traffic plans,construction phasing plans,and Certifications: engineering estimates. • Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Areas of Expertise: PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Intelligent Transportation System Snow Canyon Parkway Alternative Study;City of St.George,UT Planning/Design Client:City of St.George • Advanced Traffic Management System Traffic Engineer I 2005-2007 (ATMS)Planning/Design Alternative study to address traffic management issues for 12 intersections • Traffic/Transportation Analysis along Snow Canyon Parkway.Responsible for: • Intersection Analysis/Design • Leading the traffic analysis and intersection alternative development • Signal Design • Traffic Forecasting/Modeling design • Reversible Lane Design • Transportation Operations Analysis CTfastrak Bus Rapid Transit Corridor,Hartford,CT • Lighting Design Client:Connecticut Department of Transportation • Trail Planning/Design Roadway Engineer I 2008-2015 • Diverging Diamond Interchange Design Highway and drainage design for a 1-mile section of new bus rapid transit • Interchange Modification/Justification corridor adjacent to an active Amtrak line in a highly urbanized location. Report Development Structural design for two new bridges,one bridge reconstruction,and 12 • Access Justification Report Development retaining walls. Responsible for: • Signing Design • Providing oversight for development of busway design criteria and • Tight Diamond Interchange Design geometric layout • Transportation Planning • Roundabout Interchange Design Bonanza Drive Corridor Plan;Park City,UT • Bike/Ped Facility Planning/Design • ADA Facility Evaluation/Design Client:Park City Municipal Corporation Engineer 12007 2008 • Local Municipality Coordination Development of 20-year corridor plan including recommendations for short- • Alternative Development and Analysis term phased roadway improvements to meet future travel demand and multi- ' Plans,Specifications and Estimates(PS&E) • Categorical Exclusion Documentation modal needs. Responsible for: • Existing Conditions Analysis • Developing design alternatives and cost estimates for Bonanza Drive • Highway/Roadway Design and pedestrian underpass for Park City Rail Trail • Interchange Design • Jughandle Intersection Design Holladay Village Center Design;City of Holladay,UT • Intermodal Transportation Hub Design Client:Utah Department of Transportation • Bus Rapid Transit(BRT)Planning/Design Traffic Engineer I 2007-2010 • Guardrail and Safety Barrier Design Design for roadway,drainage,and intersection improvements including on- • Design-Build Delivery street parking,bicycle and pedestrian facilities,and aesthetics for plaza • Cost Estimate Development redevelopment area. Responsible for: • Computer-Aided Design&Drafting(CADDY • Design Study Report Development • Designing traffic signals for two intersections • Design Exception Request/Approval • Designing signing,striping,and roadway geometric improvements Constructability Reviews Provo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit Alternatives Analysis&Environmental Assessment;Utah County,UT Client:Utah Transit Authority LOCHNER 112 RESUME I Brad Lucas,PE, PTOE 2 Engineer I 2007-2016 Preparation of an FTA alternatives analysis,an environmental assessment,and conceptual engineering services for a multimodal project,including an 11-mile bus rapid transit(BRT)system with more than 5 miles of exclusive BRT lanes,as well as a new high-occupancy vehicle/toll(HOT)interchange.Responsible for: • Developing concept alternatives and preliminary design of BRT improvements • Developing cost estimates for alternative analysis Hennessy-Quigley Traffic Study;Blaine County,ID Client: Hennessy Company Traffic Engineer I 2007-2008 Traffic impact study to determine effect of new high-end real estate development on city traffic patterns. Responsible for: • Developing a traffic impact study for a large residential/golf development 1-15,Washington County Corridor Study;Washington County,UT Client:Utah Department of Transportation Engineer I 2007-2009 Corridor study for 42 miles of 1-15 from the Arizona state line to the New Harmony Interchange in Washington County, resulting in a 30-year planning document that identifies and prioritizes the corridor's immediate,interim and future needs. Responsible for: • Evaluating existing conditions and developing concept alternatives for the 1-15 corridor in Washington County TxDOT-SH 288 Toll Lane Harris County,Texas;Houston,TX Client:Texas Department of Transportation Traffic Engineer ( 2016-2020 Independent engineering services generally described as monitoring,auditing,testing,reporting,and other oversight services for the SH 288 Toll Lanes project in Harris County,Texas. SR-37,SR-108 to 5100 South Cat.Ex.,Phase II;West Haven,UT Client:Utah Department of Transportation Traffic Engineer I 2014-2017 Design services for the widening of 2.9 miles of predominantly two-lane arterial to provide a five-lane section with curb, gutter,and sidewalk on both sides;the construction of a pedestrian underpass for a city trail;and the extension or replacement of six concrete box culverts. SR 68 Pavement Rehabilitation,6700 South to 4700 South;Salt Lake County,UT Client:Utah Department of Transportation Traffic Engineer I 2015-2017 Design and preparation of a categorical exclusion for the rehabilitation of 2.5 miles of seven-lane SR 68,including asphalt milling and overlay,the replacement of 30 pedestrian ramps,the upgrade of five signal detection systems to radar equipment,and new pavement striping plans with updated school zone striping. 1-15 Noise Study,Lagoon Interchange to Layton Parkway;Layton and Kaysville,UT Client:Utah Department of Transportation Traffic Engineer I 2015-2016 Noise study to assess the noise impacts of two new auxiliary lanes on 1-15 and to evaluate the effectiveness of noise walls in mitigating impacts to affected properties. SR 9 Improvements,Rockville to Zion National Park;Washington County,UT Client:Utah Department of Transportation Traffic Engineer 2016-2018 Design, public involvement,and environmental services for 3 miles of pavement rehabilitation(overlay),3 miles of reconstruction,and 1.5 miles of widening along a popular tourist route with numerous adjacent cultural,historic,and Native American sites.Development of design specifications for cold weather construction. LOCHNER 113 RESUME Torn Stoner, f E, P.Eng Tom Stoner, P E, P.E n g Years of Eoerknae: 33 QA/QC Manager Tom Stoner is a Senior Transportation Engineer with the Tampa office and also Education: Lochner's Alternative Delivery group.He has more than 33 years of transportation • Bachelor of Science in Civil engineering experience--all as part of the Lochner team. Engineering,University of Florida 1983 Mr.Stoner has served in project management,Engineer of Record,and senior Professional Registration: design roles for a diverse range of projects—predominantly roadway,bridge,and • Professional Engineer:FL#40251 interchange design, but also project development and environment studies,traffic ' Professional Engineer:IL#062.061429 • Professional Engineer:KY#22142 studies,traffic design,and construction engineering and inspection(CEI)contracts. He has led the design of dozens of greenfield and brownfield roadway projects Areas of Expertise: in urban and rural locations.His technical expertise includes complex roadway and • Project Management interchange geometrics,lighting,signalization,signing and pavement marking, drainage,traffic analysis, permitting,and CADD systems management.He also has experience in construction inspection,document control,and CPM scheduling—tasks that he notably performed as part of Lochner's CEI team for the$220 million Sunshine Skyway Bridge,which spans Florida's Tampa Bay. Mr.Stoner is a highly experienced project manager who,over his career,has successfully headed high-profile and complex design projects,such as the$200 million CR 296 Connector projects in Pinellas County, Florida. He has often managed several major,multidisciplinary projects at one time,and has been responsible for concurrent projects with total construction costs in excess of$350 million. He has led several large public involvement initiatives for environmentally sensitive projects. Mr.Stoner brings his wealth of technical and management experience with him to Lochner's Alternative Delivery group.His responsibilities include pursuit and proposal management for alternative delivery projects(public—private partnerships,design—builds,and CM/GCs)across the US and Canada. In addition to developing and implementing pursuit strategies, Mr.Stoner is often involved in technical proposal preparation and serves as a senior member of the engineering team on select projects. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Marshall Main St Streetscape;Fauquier County,VA Client:Carson Land Consultants Electrical Engineer 1 2010-2017 NEPA compliance, lighting design and engineering support services for the Marshall Main Street enhancement project in Fauquier County. Located in the Marshall Main Street historic district,improvements will include improved sidewalks, enhanced pedestrian flow,landscaping,lighting,and burying overhead utilities through the core business district. Responsible for: • Lighting Design SR 690(SR 686)Stage 2-3,EB Zipper,Pinellas County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2010-2014 Design of eastbound travel lanes for 1.25 miles(40th Street to 28th Street)of the new SR 690(SR 686)connector to 1-275 in Clearwater, Florida, including a 1,700-foot mainline bridge,cantilevered over the 34th Street intersection. Responsible for: • All aspects of the Roadway Design US 19(SR 55)from N of Nebraska Ave to S of Tlmberlane Rd;Pinellas County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2016-2019 Design to upgrade of 2.4 miles of US 19 from north of Nebraska Avenue to south of Timberlane Road from a six-lane arterial to an elevated,six-lane controlled-access expressway with two-lane,one-way frontage roads on either side.To improve pedestrian safety,Lochner developed an innovative design for a"pedestrian thruway"—the first of its kind—which will allow pedestrians to cross US 19 at grade under an elevated road profile.This will cost significantly less than an overpass and has much greater accessibility.Responsible for: • All aspects of the design of one single-point urban interchange and one Tight Urban Diamond Interchange LOCHNER 114 P.1 Sl!MI I Inm Stoner~, P1 P-Fng SR 64 at Rye Road;Manatee County,FL Client:Patel,Greene,&Associates,PLLC Electrical Engineer I 2016-2018 Responsible for: • Engineer of Record for Lighting Design Gateway Expressway Design-Build Support(1462);Pinellas County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Senior Engineer I 2016-2021 Responsible for: • Design-Build RFP and concept development FDOT District 7 General Engineering Consultant;Districtwide,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2014-2019 General engineering consultant services for five-year period(2014-2019)under a $30M contract spanning transportation development support tasks in the areas of engineering,surveying,architecture,landscaping,geographic information systems,and management with a primary focus on design-build program management,as well as right of way appraisal and acquisition services.Responsible for: • Performing overall program management of the$30M-5 yr GEC Contract • Developing Design-Build RFP • Preparing express lane concepts,Tolling and Gantry Layouts,Operations and Maintenance Reports,Interchange Concepts,Staff Augmentation at FDOT and R/W Services GEC-Task01 Gateway Express DB RFP Support;Pinellas County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2014-2014 Design—build services for the Gateway Express:an elevated,tolled expressway connecting US 19,St.Petersburg—Clearwater Airport,and the Bayside Bridge directly to 1-275.Lochner will combine five sets of design plans originally intended for separate construction,adjust to include toll facilities,reduce detail to the level of indicative plans suitable for a design—build RFP,and create a homogenous design that can be built as one project.Lochner will also prepare all technical specifications for the design—build RFP and provide technical advice to FDOT during the two-stage selection and evaluation process, including a review of the plans and alternative technical concepts submitted in Stage 2.Once FDOT selects a design—build team and the project commences,Lochner will review all design plans prior to construction and will serve as FDOT's Client's representative for technical issues that arise during construction. Responsible for: • Design-Build RFP and concept development GEC-Task031-275-SR 60 Interchange Analysis;Hillsborough County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2014-2014 Development of design concepts,estimation of the associated right of way impacts and construction costs,and level of service analyses for the addition of express lanes through the 1-275/SR 60 interchange.The concepts will include connections to Tampa International Airport,the Veterans Expressway express lanes,and a Westshore intermodal center;general access to the Westshore business district;and future connections to an intercity passenger rail system.Responsible for: • Preparing express lane interchange concepts GEC Task041-275-1-4 Interchange Analysis;Hillsborough County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2014-2014 Development of design concepts,estimation of the associated right of way impacts and construction costs,and level of service analyses for the addition of express lanes through the 1-275/1-4 interchange.The concepts will include connections to downtown Tampa and identify the location of a proposed rail envelope. Responsible for: • Preparing express lane interchange concepts LOCHNER 115 RESUME 1 Tom Stoner,PE,P.Eng GEC Task051-75-1-4 Interchange Analysis;Hillsborough County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2014- Development of design concepts,estimation of the associated right of way impacts and construction costs,and level of service analyses for the addition of express lanes through the 1-4/1-75 interchange.The concepts will include connections to express lanes in all directions to and from 1-75 and accommodate a high-speed rail corridor that is being considered for construction in this area.Responsible for: • Preparing express lane interchange concepts GEC-Task10 Analysis of Interchange Concepts;Tampa,FL • Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2014-2016 Development of design concepts,estimation of the associated right of way impacts and construction costs,and level of service analyses for the addition of express lanes through the I-275/SR 60, 1-275/1-4,and 1-4/1-75 interchanges.Responsible for: • Preparing express lane interchange concepts GEC-Task12 DB RFP Development;Tampa,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2014-2016 Responsible for: • Design-Build RFP development on multiple projects GEC-Task21 DB RFP Development;Tampa,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2015-2018 Responsible for: • Design-Build RFP development on multiple projects GEC-Task26 General Design Services;Tampa,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager 1 2015-2018 Responsible for: • Express Lane Interchange concepts L O C H N E R 116 RESUME I Matt Wey, PE, PTOE i Matt Wey, PE PTOE Years ° of Experience: 0 Traffic Engineer Matthew Wey joined Lochner in 2015,with 18 years'experience in transportation Education: and traffic engineering and planning for federal,state,municipal,university,and • Bachelor of Science in Civil private clients. Mr.Wey has served as project manager or lead engineer on a wide Engineering,University of South variety of multimodal transportation planning projects,NEPA environmental Florida,Tampa,FL 1997 studies,and project development and environment(PD&E)studies.His expertise • Masters of Science in Civil Engineering, includes the development of regional multimodal transportation plans and freight university of South Florida,Tampa,FL programs,the creation of large-scale access management plans,and the 2000 completion of traffic impact and transportation corridor studies in rural,urban,and Professional Registration: environmentally sensitive locations. He has headed many public engagement • Professional Engineer:FL#59545 programs and has considerable experience in coordination between governmental and environmental agencies,transit and utility providers, businesses,community Affiliations: groups,and other project stakeholders.He has conducted technical analyses to • Institute of Transportation Engineers support many interchange modification and operational analysis reports and is experienced in the development of design traffic memoranda and preliminary Certifications: engineering reports,conceptual roadway design,and transportation cost • Professional Traffic Operations estimating. Engineer Areas of Expertise: PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Public Involvement • Traffic/Transportation Analysis Phase I Corridor and Alignment Studies for Peoria Eastern Bypass;Tazewell, • Transportation Operations Analysis Woodford,Peoria Co.,IL Client:Illinois Department of Transportation • Interchange Modification/Justification Report Development Engineer I 2015-2018 • Corridor Studies Phase I study for a proposed 25-mile,limited access facility in the Peoria,Illinois • Categorical Exclusion Documentation metropolitan area.This is a Context Sensitive Solutions(CSS)project and includes • Alternative Development and Analysis extensive stakeholder involvement. The study is being performed in two parts:a • Intersection Analysis/Design Corridor Study to identify the best general corridor,followed by Tier 1 • Transportation Planning Environmental Impact Statement. • Traffic Forecasting/Modeling 118th Expressway;Clearwater,FL Client:Atkins North America, Inc. Engineer I 2015-2017 Traffic Control,Lighting,and Structural design services for the construction of a new urban expressway within the existing median of 118th Avenue.Lochner prepared a bridge development report for three structures(totaling over 6,000 feet in length and including post-tensioned straddle bents)and final design plans for one structure—a 1,600-foot bridge that incorporates the new Florida I-Beam.Lochner is also responsible for traffic control,construction staging,lighting design, environmental field work,and utility coordination. Transportation Engineering and Planning Services;Sarasota County,FL Client:Sarasota County Government Project Manager I 2015-2017 Intersection study to perform traffic analysis and determine the improvements needed to make Honore Avenue and Bee Ridge Road intersection operate at acceptable level of service conditions under future 2038 traffic conditions.Further,a conceptual design plan for the addition of northbound right turn storage lane was developed. Strategic Intermodal System(SIS)Studies-2012;Districtwide,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2015-2018 On-call planning services and studies for Florida DOT's District 7 Strategic Intermodal System facilities. I-27S Pinellas Managed Lanes Study;Pinellas County,FL Client:HDR,Inc. LOCHNER 117 RESUME Mjtt',ti'ey, PE,PTOE Engineer I 2015-2017 Engineering,alternative development,and cost estimation for the addition of managed lanes to 1-275 in Pinellas County as part of a regional master plan to add managed lanes to major highways. 1-75 Regional Corridor Transportation Use Evaluation;Multiple Counties,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Supervisor(Task Mgr.) I 2015-2016 Lochner conducted a regional corridor transportation use evaluation for consideration of transit options along the 1-75 Corridor,from Wesley Chapel in Pasco County to the north to the Bradenton/Palmetto area in Manatee County to the south. Additional considerations included assessing various mobility options for the connection from Brandon to downtown Tampa in Hillsborough County. US 19,70th Avenue to 118th Avenue PD&E Study;Pinellas Park,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Engineer I 2016-2017 Reevaluation of a previous PD&E study—including new conceptual designs,cost estimates,environmental studies,and public involvement initiatives—for improvements to a 3.6-mile stretch of US 19 and the US 19/Gandy Boulevard interchange. US 19(SR 55)from N of Nebraska Ave to S of limberlane Rd;Pinellas County,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Engineer I 2016- 2019 Design to upgrade of 2.4 miles of US 19 from north of Nebraska Avenue to south of Timberlane Road from a six-lane arterial to an elevated,six-lane controlled-access expressway with two-lane,one-way frontage roads on either side.To improve pedestrian safety,Lochner developed an innovative design for a "pedestrian thruway"—the first of its kind—which will allow pedestrians to cross US 19 at grade under an elevated road profile.This will cost significantly less than an overpass and has much greater accessibility. Alt US 19-SR 595 Corridor Study II from Belleair Rd to Pinellas-Pasco County Line;Pinellas,FL Client:Florida Department of Transportation-District 7 Project Manager I 2016-2018 Lochner is conducting a study analysis of travel related problems, needs and issues along the SR 595/Alt 19 corridor from Belleair Rd to the Pinellas/Pasco County line for FDOT District 7.This project involves a corridor study(pre-PD&E)to evaluate the need for multimodal transportation improvement along a congested regional transportation corridor.Lochner is tasked with identifying the cause and characteristics of the corridor's transportation issues.This may include capacity issues,traffic operations,safety,access and egress,freight movements,transit, bicycles,and pedestrian movements.Lochner is also tasked with identifying both current US 19 corridor travel conditions and needs and forecasted travel characteristics and needs while also developing potential workable and implementable solutions for travel needs.Testing of alternatives for potential improvements may also be involved. Mainline Widening(Jupiter to Ft.Pierce)PDE Study;Orlando,FL Client:Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Engineer I 2017-2019 Lochner is evaluating alternatives for the widening of Florida's Turnpike(SR 91)from Indiantown Road to SR 70(Okeechobee Road).A distance of approximately 36.7 miles.The project corridor contains a crossing of the Loxahatchee River and St.Lucie Canal. In addition,the corridor contains Florida Gas Transmission and the Fort Pierce/Port St.Lucie Service Plaza.The project is located in Palm Beach,Martin and St.Lucie Counties.Improvements to the existing interchanges in the corridor will be evaluated.New interchange access locations will also be evaluated as part of the study. LOCHNER 118 MAGGIE BRUNO 1 PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUP Principal & Public Information Manager 14,:t$. EXPERIENCE: 20 Years LANGUAGES: English & Spanish EDUCATION: A.A., Business Administration, Miami Dade College,1981 B.S., Communications, Miami Dade College, 1984 As Principal of ACE Public Relations, Maggie Bruno brings 20 years of experience working with both the public and private sectors in the transportation industry encompassing a myriad of disciplines in communications, media relations, public information and project management. Her background includes developing and managing public information/communication programs, forming corporate partnerships, consensus building, interagency collaboration, community outreach, special event planning, high profile campaigns and crisis management. Ms. Bruno has managed many projects and tasks successfully to meet established deadlines. As a long-time South Florida resident, she has worked extensively with local media and has developed strong working relationships with local officials, civic organizations and special interest groups throughout the tri- county area. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Six, Public Communications Programs, Miami, FL Reference: FDOT-D6, Cynthia Turcios, Public Information Specialist, (305) 470-5349 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 —2016 Role: Lead Public Information Specialist Ms. Bruno served as the lead Public Information Specialist on this contract. She oversaw the Drive Safe 95 Express campaign. Ms. Bruno acted as the main source for project related information; developed and wrote plans and/or proposals for upcoming projects and campaigns; identified potential impacts to the public as a result of any FDOT projects; prepared and disseminated collateral materials, developed and identified strategic alliances and corporate partnerships; prepared and presented project information for meetings; created reports for safety campaigns; coordinated resolution of issues; maintained database of stakeholders/partnerships; prepared information for updating website and social media; performed media responses by interview or in writing as needed; coordinated and staffed formal and informal public meetings. FDOT District Six, Miscellaneous Districtwide, Miami, FL Reference: FDOT-D6, Kathy McLendon, Construction Public Information Manager, (305) 525-4988 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 — 2016 Role: Public Information Specialist Ms. Bruno served as a Public Information Specialist on this contract, as the source for project related information due to her extensive interaction with the South Florida community. Ms. Bruno prepared presentation materials, executed speeches and press releases; presented project information for meetings; and coordinated and staffed formal and informal public meetings. As part of this contract, she was assigned to plan, coordinate and execute the Krome Avenue Groundbreaking Ceremony. In addition, she was instrumental in the planning of the Governor's Press Conference on the 57th Avenue project in Hialeah. City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects, Miami Beach, FL Reference: Lauren Firtel, Public Information Specialist, (305) 673-7071 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 —2016 Role: Public Information Liaison Ms. Bruno supported public information activities on the high-profile capital improvements project on the Venetian Isles in the City of Miami Beach. In this role, she was responsible for providing support to the Public Information Specialist for the day-to-day coordination between affected stakeholders and the project team. She provided translation services and reviewed all project collaterals including construction advisories and updates to the project website. She supported the coordination and facilitation of public meetings and special events and worked closely with her project team to coordinate construction activities with local special events. 119 MAGGIE BRUNO Public Information Manager ACE Public Relations Group FDOT District Four, 1-75 Express Lanes-Segment E, Miami, FL Reference: Parsons Brinckerhoff, Greg T. Smith, Project Manager, (407) 587-7800 Project Start and End Dates: 2013 — 2015 Role: Public Information Specialist Ms. Bruno supported all public information activities on this project including the development and dissemination of project information, coordination and facilitation of public meetings and workshops, providing updates to local governments and civic organizations, as well as coordinating with local media, residents and businesses. She worked closely with the project team and the in-house public information officer on this project which called for constructing express lanes in the existing median on 1-75 north of Griffin Road to 1-595 in Broward County. FDOT District Four, 1-595 Express Corridor Improvements Project, Davie, FL Reference: 1-595 Express, LLC, Alvaro Muelas, CEO, (954) 513-3220 Project Start and End Dates: 2009 — 2014 Role: Public Information Specialist Ms. Bruno oversaw all the public involvement efforts for the concessionaire on this project. She developed an effective public involvement and outreach program, assisted FDOT with the projects Community Awareness Plan (CAP), maintained stakeholder databases, call logs, developed Bilingual collateral documents, including construction updates, fact sheets, and advisories. Ms. Bruno was the direct contact for all construction activities impacting the area businesses and communities. She developed and implemented policies and procedures for third party property damage claims and handled all the property license agreements with the affected stakeholders. Ms. Bruno served as the 1-595 Express spokesperson and prepared and organized press releases as well as, provided inter-agency communication. In addition, throughout the life of the project, Ms. Bruno planned and facilitated several special events, including the groundbreaking, public meetings, and ribbon cuttings. Miami Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) - Miami, FL, 2006 —2008 Reference: Javier Rodriguez, Executive Director(305) 637-3277 Ms. Bruno served as Public Communications Manager. She planned, managed and coordinated countywide comprehensive communication programs, campaigns and activities for the Authority. Ms. Bruno oversaw the communication and public involvement consultants' contracts. Ms. Bruno coordinated communication activities between MDX and the public, school groups, civic and professional organizations, and industry vendors. She served as the Authority's spokesperson for local, national and international media, prepared and organized press releases, and met regularly with representatives of the media to conduct briefings and provide project and construction information for all MDX roadways. She developed presentation materials, supervised the production of project collateral materials, organized public meetings and workshops to educate stakeholders about each project. She participated in industry events, presentations, groundbreakings and ribbon cuttings. PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF (PB) - Broward County, FL, 2001-2006 Reference: Leo Auger, Vice President, (813) 520-4444 Ms. Bruno served as Project Manager and Director of FDOT's South Florida Commuter Services (SFCS), a regional rideshare program in South Florida. She was responsible for the overall program management. Ms. Bruno performed strategic marketing and research planning for SFCS program services, projected and managed the program budget, and supervised a regional staff of 15+ employees including administrative, communications and customer service professionals. Ms. Bruno established clear and measurable goals through the development of SFCS annual work plan and strategic marketing plans that maximized dollars for media purchases. Ms. Bruno developed and handled intergovernmental relations and coordinated communication activities between FDOT and local agencies, business leaders, major corporations, school groups, the general public, civic and professional organizations. She served as an ex-officio board member and representation on several committees as well as spokesperson for local media. She was responsible for developing presentation materials and supervised the production of project collateral materials. 120 11511 YASIR MERCADO Public Information Specialist PIRLIC REI.%TIOVS GROUP EXPERIENCE: 10 Years LANGUAGES: English & Spanish EDUCATION: M.A., Global Governance, Florida International University, 2013 B.A., International Relations, Florida International University, 2010 B.A., Psychology, Florida International University, 2010 Ms. Mercado serves as Public Information Specialist for ACE Public Relations Group, LLC, and has more than 10 years of experience working with public and private sector clients. A South Florida resident, she is a fully bilingual (English/Spanish) communications professional with exceptional interpersonal skills who is able to build strong professional relationships with her clients, stakeholders and various groups and organizations. She is highly organized and detail oriented. Ms. Mercado is adept at developing and implementing processes and procedures to achieve established goals and can manage multiple tasks and projects simultaneously while maintaining a high level of performance and meeting established deadlines. She has extensive experience in directing and coordinating all communication efforts from start to finish. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE City of Miami Beach Office of Capital Improvement Projects, Miami Beach, FL Reference: Lauren Firtel, Public Information Specialist, (305) 673-7071 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 — 2016 Role: Public Information Liaison Ms. Mercado performed public information and outreach on a communications contract for the Venetian Islands Neighborhood Improvements Project. She served as the source for all project related information and served as the point of contact for residential issues and concerns. This project included replacing water mains and services, stormwater drainage system and pump stations, lining sanitary sewer main lines, reconstructing the roadway, replacing sidewalks and ramps, concrete valley gutters, pedestrian lighting, and landscape. She developed and maintained the stakeholder database, detailed issue logs, call logs, and right-of-way infringement logs. Ms. Mercado also developed collateral documents, construction updates, fact sheets and advisories in English and Spanish, and updated the project's webpage and all related information to the City's electronic document management system. She also scheduled field and stakeholder meetings, taking detailed notes and reporting on her project; attended bi-weekly progress meetings and reported on potential impacts to the public as a result of construction; and prepared monthly reports for the City's Public Information Specialists. She drafted and distributed written responses to all inquiries and works with the project team, contractor, and stakeholders to monitor construction activities and schedules. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Six, Miscellaneous Districtwide, Miami, FL Reference: FDOT-D6, Kathy McClendon, Construction Public Information Manager, (305) 525-4988 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 —2016 Role: Assistant Public Information Specialist Ms. Mercado supported public information activities on a districtwide contract in Miami-Dade County. In her support role, she created stakeholder databases and assisted with community and stakeholder outreach efforts (i.e. door-to-door outreach and mailings) for various roadway projects. She provided translation services and developed a wide array of project collaterals including construction advisories, Fact Sheets, and PowerPoint presentations. Ms. Mercado supported the activities of the Public Inofmration Specialist by coordinating and facilitating public meetings and special events and worked closely with her project team to coordinate construction activities with stakeholders. She was also responsible for performing website audits on the Department's website. 121 YASIR MERCADO Public Information Specialist ACE Public Relations Group FDOT District Six, Public Communication Programs & Special Projects, Miami, FL Reference: FDOT-D6, Cynthia Turcios, Public Information Specialist, (305) 470-5349 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 — 2016 Role: Assistant Public Information Specialist Ms. Mercado supported communication planning, public relations and community involvement for FDOT Communications Programs and Special Projects. Ms. Mercado supported research efforts, coordination, and facilitation of special events for the Drive Safe 95 Express Safety Campaign. She assisted in creating campaign databases and public information efforts. Ms. Mercado also provides translation services and assisted in developing project collaterals. FDOT District Six, SR 5/US 1/South Dixie Highway Safety Design Projects, Miami, FL Reference: Eugenio Ochoa, P.E., Principal, Lakes Engineering, (305) 667-1657 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 Role: Public Involvement Specialist Ms. Mercado supported public involvement efforts on two separate but related design projects for FDOT District Six. These safety projects include SR 5 from Ponce de Leon Boulevard to SW 37 Avenue and SR 5 at the intersection of Riviera Drive in the City of Miami and the City of Coral Gables. In her support role, Ms. Mercado assisted with the coordination and facilitation of a Public Hearing by helping with room set up, attendee greeting and sign-in, distribution of project information and speaker cards. FDOT District Four, Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Studies • Midway Road/CR 712 from Glades Cutt Off Road to Selvitz Road PD&E Study, St. Lucie County, FL Reference: Alex B. Hull, Consultant Project Manager, Inwood Consulting Engineers, (407) 971-8850 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 • SR-9/I-95 at SR-804/Boynton Beach & Gateway Boulevard Interchanges, Palm Beach County, FL Reference: Henry Deibel, P.E., Consultant Project Manager, ARCADIS U.S., Inc., (561) 697-7075 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 • SR-9/I-95 at Northlake Boulevard Interchange and SR-911-95, Palm Beach County, FL Reference: Bill Evans, P.E.. AICP, Consultant Project Manager, Stanley Consultants Inc., (561) 689-7444 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 • SR-9/I-95 at SR-80/Southern Boulevard Interchange, Palm Beach County, FL Reference: Cassie Piche, P.E., Consultant Project Manager, RS&H, (954) 236-7365 Project Start and End Dates: 2015 Role: Public Involvement Specialist & Quality Assurance Ms. Mercado supported public involvement and public information efforts for various PD&E studies throughout District Four to enhance overall traffic operations at the existing interchanges. She was responsible for quality assurance of the public outreach strategies and quality control on all deliverables. She ensured the Department received the highest degree of reliability and quality service. Ms. Mercado also assisted with the coordination and facilitation of the Public Kick-off Meetings and room set up, attendee greeting and sign-in, distribution of project information and speaker cards. Ms. Mercado performed outreach for each project, providing affected businesses and residents with project and public meeting information. FDOT Statewide, Construction Careers Consultant Reference: Stefan Kulakowski, State Contract Compliance Administrator, (850) 414-4742 Role: Career Consultant and Event Planner Ms. Mercado supported the FDOT Construction Careers Program, acting on behalf of the Florida Department of Transportation to recruit and champion the On the Job Training (OJT) Program, Construction Career Days and other workforce development initiatives. She tracked and maintained detailed outreach logs, which were provided to the project team on a weekly basis. Ms. Mercado supported the coordination and facilitation of two construction career fairs held in South Florida and worked closely with her project team to coordinate contractor and recruit participation. She provided mentoring, resume building and face-to-face interview preparation for the career fair participants. 122 KIRK J. OLNEY, R.L.A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ► Over 16 years of experience in landscape architecture - in particular, parks, streetscapes and roadway landscape design. Has several years of master planning, conceptual and detailed design,the production and management of construction documents. > Has experience preparing and submitting applications to regulatory agencies and responding to comments accordingly to obtain required permits. YEARS OF EXP. > His special area of interest and expertise is the use of tropical and 17 subtropical plant material. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: in Landscape Architecture, • Beautification Master Plan, Miami Lakes FL The Ohio State • B.F. James Park & Aquatic Facility Master Plan, Hallandale Beach, FL University, Columbus, Ohio 1995 • Lauderdale Lakes Streetscape Master Plan, Lauderdale Lakes, FL* • Tamarac Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, Tamarac, FL* REGISTRATIONS State of Florida, • Sullivan Park Master Plan, Deerfield Beach, FL Registered Landscape • South City Beach Park Master Plan. Hallandale Beach, FL Architect, No LA0001705 • Scavo Park Master Plan, Hallandale Beach, FL Received on • Venera Mixed-use Development, Coral Gables, FL November, 2000 • Triptych Mixed-Use Development, Miami (Design District), FL • Oasis Mixed-use Development, Hallandale Beach, FL • Intracoastal Parks, Sunny Isles Beach, FL • West Palm Beach Gateway & Beautification, West Palm Beach, FL* • Ibis Golf and Country Club Hurricane Mitigation and Restoration, West Palm Beach, FL* • HOH Hospital Renovation and Expansion Project, Aruba • Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL* Prior to Joining B&A ba 123 JOSHUA RAK FORM BASED CODE /URBAN DESIGN ► Close to 10 years of Urban & Planning experience P. Extensive experience in the creation urban design details and zoning ordinances ► Strong multidisciplinary background ► Knowledgeable/Experienced in formulation & implementation of the regulatory needs YEARS OF EXP. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE: 9+ • Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Master Plan, Palmetto Bay, FL EDUCATION • Village of Palmetto Bay Downtown Urban Village Regulations Master of Architecture, University of Miami, (Form-Based Code), Palmetto Bay, FL Miami, FL, 2008 • Port Tampa Bay Channelside Master Plan, Tampa, FL Bachelor of • 2040 Strategic Master Plan, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, FL Architecture, University of Miami, Miami, FL, • TIGER Grant-Tampa Channelside, Tampa, FL* 2006 • Marassi Marina Update ACCREDITATIONS • Village of Miami Shores Community Center Feasibility Study LEED Green Associate • West Dade Finding of Necessity • La Chorrera Development Plan, Panama • Tapia Property, Panama • Bird Road Corridor Study, Miami, FL* • Coral Villa Estates Charette, Miami, FL* • Poinciana Industrial Park, Miami, FL* • Palmer Lake Charette, Miami, FL* • Transit-oriented Development, Miami Gardens, FL* • Village of El Portal Charette, El Portal, FL* • Country Club Urban Area District- Miami, FL* • Richmond Heights Charette, Miami, FL* • Bird Road Urban Area Zoning District, Miami, FL* • North Central Ordinance, Miami, FL* Prior to Joining BS.A ba 124 BiG Booth*Transit Conaltnq LLC Boothe Transit Consulting (BTC), LLC is led by President Jeff - .. Boothe who has spent nearly forty years in the public transit industry. He combines deep knowledge of the public transit industry; decades shaping federal laws, regulations and • guidance that govern public transit; counseling clients on federal compliance issues; substantial understanding of the ( federal government as a Congressional staffer advising former United States Senate Appropriations Committee t "� Chairman Mark O. Hatfield to advance the first light rail project in Portland, Oregon through the appropriations and 11 federal approval process, as the leader of two major transit industry coalitions, and in the representation of many clients before the Department of Transportation, and the Federal Transit Administration and, a proven record of providing strategic guidance to clients seeking to secure federal funding and finance for capital projects through the Capital Investment Grants ("CIG") program. Services offered by BTC include: • Strategic advisory services to transit agencies, cities and project sponsors seeking to advance transit capital investments, including project prioritization, identifying funding options, and, project finance; • Advise on complying with federal laws, regulations and guidance impacting project approvals, project finance, procurement, and Buy America; • Technical assistance regarding the securing funding under the CIG program, including Core Capacity, New Starts and Small Starts. BTC was formed in May 2015 after Boothe spent nearly thirty years in private legal practice and ten years on Capitol Hill. He is the only employee of BTC. Familiarity with FTA Processes Boothe combines deep and long-standing knowledge of the FTA statute, rules, and guidance with extensive project experience. Starting in 1987 Boothe began to work on projects seeking to navigate the New Starts and now CIG processes for project approvals. Further, Boothe has shaped the laws, regulations and guidance for project approvals having directly drafted the current definitions for Bus Rapid Transit Projects, the Program of Interrelated Projects and advocated for the elimination of the "baseline" alternative, the FTA Alternatives Analysis process and Final Design leading to the current stream-lined project approval process. As Chair of the Capital Investment Grants Working Group, he has had a greater impact on the current CIG project approval than any person not currently working at FTA or on Capitol Hill. Further, Boothe has extensive project level experience working directly for transit agencies with projects in the New Starts and now CIG process, or as a sub-consultant to engineering firms. 125 BiC Booths Tr•nut Cormltwp LLC Current Project Work for Transit Agencies • Downtown-Riverfront Streetcar Project - provide strategic counsel to the Project Management Team through my contract with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) and the city of West Sacramento regarding the FTA project approval processes to the Project Management Team that is comprised of Sacramento Regional Transit (SacRT) and Yolo County Transit; the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento; and, Sacramento Council of Governments (SACOG), which is leading the project management team. The project is currently in Project Development, was included for funding in the President's FY 17 Budget, and is expected to execute a grant agreement in Fall 2017. Ed Scofield, Sacramento Regional Transit - (916) 321-3854. January 2011-present. • Laker Line Bus Rapid Transit Project - represent Interurban Transit Partnership (ITP) and provided strategic counsel on project specific issues, including compliance with the National Environmental Policy (NEPA) for a site acquired to serve as the CNG fueling station for the project and the ITP bus fleet. Project is in Project Development and recommended for funding in the President's FY 17 Budget and expects to receive a grant agreement in Fall 2017. Peter Varga - Interurban Transit Partnership - (616) 456- 1941. Summer 2015-present • Seattle Center City Loop - represent the city of Seattle for the project that was included in the President's FY 17 Budget and expected to execute a grant agreement in mid- 2017. Reviewed the drafts of the submission to the FTA for the FY 17 Budget and pro- vided strategic counsel to the city of Seattle as the project advances through Project De- velopment. Andrew Glass-Hastings - city of Seattle - (206) 684-4384. January 2015- present • Southwest Light Rail Extension - represent the Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB) which is a five country entity that provides capital funding for all Metro Transit CIG-eligible projects. Role is to advise CTIB staff and Board on the CIG project approval process, review risk assessments prepared for each transit way project that is or will be seeking CIG funding, and advise CTIB on actions to protect the financial interests of the five counties that comprise CTIB. Currently reviewing the risk assessment for the SWLRT and providing strategic counsel on the project schedule, project cost and risk items that might affect both cost and schedule. The project has been approved for entry into Engineering by FTA. Mary Richardson - Counties Transit Improvement Board - (651) 222-7227. January 2014-present • Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) - following adoption of a one-half cent sales tax in November 2016, MARTA sought assistance to: (1) develop technical capacity within MARTA to understand the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program project development and approval process; (2) to develop criteria for establishing project priorities among several proposed projects within the boundaries of Atlanta, including expansion of the streetcar, bus rapid transit and Clifton Corridor LRT; (3) participate in negotiations with the city of Atlanta to develop the project priority list; and, (4) work with the MARTA staff to develop project recommendations to the MARTA Board; and, (5) to educate the Board regarding the CIG program, to explain the criteria selected and support the staff to secure approval of the MARTA Board of the staff recommendations. 126 dew B-tC Booby Trr,ut ConuAhn9 LLC Ben Limmer - Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority - (404) 848-4401. December 2016-present. 127 • E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT - ---— i (Complete one Section E/or each key_person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE A.TOTAL I B.WITH CURRENT FIRM Jeffrey F. Boothe FTA Coordination,Funding;Financing 35 j 2+years 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Boothe Transit Consulting,LLC,Washington,DC - - 1 16.EDUCATION(Degree and Specializatkn) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) JD IS.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations.Training,Awards.etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS — •(1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) ------- (2)YEAR COMPLETED - -j --- —- - - --- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES j CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) 1 Downtown-Riverfront Streetcar,Sacramento,CA In Planning -- I — ----—— —--' --- a. t (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE --___----_-- ----_--_ �C Check ifproject performed with current firm li $150 million 3.3 mile Streetcar protect connecting West Sacramento and Sacramento.CAA Rob:Capital Investment Grants strategy,technical counsel,FTA Liaison r (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ; CONSTRUCTION(H applicable) Charlotte Blue Line Extension, Charlotte,NC -`— — b. Iscope. ----. 2011 - Open in Spring 2017 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief eco pe.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE i [- Check if project performed with current firm $1.7 billion 9.3 mile LRT extension heading East.Northeast from downtown Charlotte connecting to existing LRT in south Charlotte Role: Capital Investment Grants strategy,technical counsel,FTA Liaison (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED --- - - - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A CONSTRUCTION(IT applicable) Silver Line Bus Rapid Transit,Grand Rapids,MI — -- 2012 _- - : 20114 - - - (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc)AND SPECIFIC ROLE I if project performed with current firm c. $39 million,9.3 mile Bus Rapid Transit project operating in Division Street from downtwon Grand Rapids to the south Role: Capital Investment Grants strategy,technical counsel,legal counsel and FTA Liaison. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED - - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) ' South Line Phase II LRT Project 2005 2015 , d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,she,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if r0 ect p-j performed with current firm $240 million,4.3 mile extension to the existing Light Rail System extending south and connecting to Consumnes River College Role: Capital Investment Grants Strategy,technical counsel,outside legal counsel and FTA Liaison (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and Slate) - - (2)YEAR COMPLETED -- - Norfolk Light Rail Project,Norfolk,VA -- - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ' CONSTRUCTION(Il applicable) 1995 2011 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Ii Check if project performed with current firm O. $318 million,7.4 mile light rail system from downtown Norfolk to border with Virignia,Beach,VA Rote: Capital Investment Grants Strategy,technical counsel,outside legal counsel and FTA Liaison SF 330 SECTION E 128 www.camsys.com ROBERTO ALVARADO-VASQUEZ, LEED AP Senior Associate Cambridge Systematics, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Mr. Alvarado-Vazquez is a Senior Associate of Cambridge Master of Engineering, Civil Systematics with 9 years of experience in transportation Engineering, Texas A&M University, planning and finance. He leverages his engineering training, 2010 cross-functional collaboration skills, and financial skills to help transportation agencies make informed strategic Bachelor of Science, Civil investment decisions. Collectively, he has provided financial Engineering, University of Puerto Rico, analyses, performance evaluation services, and traffic and 2007 revenue (T&R) studies to over 25 different organizations at the local, state, and Federal level. Highlights of his AREAS OF EXPERTISE experience include: • Developed econometric models and conducted Transportation Finance quantitative assessments to help clients identify, Transportation Planning evaluate, and forecast revenue streams to support Transit Planning transportation investments. • Designed robust excel-based models to determine YEARS OF EXPERIENCE future financial position, assess project risks, and evaluate overall financial capacity to deliver and Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Senior operate transportation systems. Associate, 2010-Present • Conducted a level 1 T&R revenue forecast for 1-10 in Mississippi and collaborated designing the analytical OFFICE LOCATION models that evaluated the short-term traffic and revenue implications of converting the Tobin Bridge Atlanta, GA in Massachusetts to all-electronic tolling (AET) facility. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Mississippi DOT, Statewide Traffic and Revenue Study— LEED AP Certified Conducted a Level 1 traffic and revenue forecast for tolling I- 10. Prepared capital, operating, and maintenance cost estimates and estimated the bonding capacity of the revenue and cost streams expected to be available. Massachusetts DOT - Tobin Bridge All-Electonic Toll Collection Scenarios. Estimated the traffic and revenue impacts of implementing All Electronic Tolling (AET) on the Tobin Bridge. Mr. Alvarado assisted in the development of the analytical model that evaluated the short-term traffic and revenue implications of the implementation. Mr. Alvarado analyzed the historical transactions and revenue trends of the past 10 years, developed AET assumptions based on industry experience, and tested three toll increase scenarios. CAMBRIDGE 129 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com PETER HALIBURTON, CENG Principal Cambridge Systematics, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Peter Haliburton, CEng, is a Principal of Cambridge M.S., Transportation Engineering, Systematics with experience in transit planning, University of Natal, South Africa, 1993 transportation planning, transportation engineering, civil engineering, corridor, and traffic impact studies, and B.S., Civil Engineering, community outreach. Mr. Haliburton has managed dozens University of Natal, South Africa, 1991 of transportation planning and engineering projects with diverse private and public clients over the past 20 years. He AREAS OF EXPERTISE has managed all aspects of projects, including proposal preparation, assembling multidisciplinary teams, contracting and conducting work, making presentations, completing Transportation Planning documentation, invoicing, and coordinating between team Corridor and Traffic Impact Studies members. His specific experience includes the following. Transit Planning Transportation Finance Florida DOT District 4 TSM&O Master Plan Mr. Haliburton Transportation Engineering supported the development of a Phase 1 TSM&O Master Plan Civil Engineering for District 4, addressing all modes, identifying a strategic Community Outreach network and recommending an initial implementation focus with targeted service packages in three service areas. He is currently supporting the District in expanding the Master Plan YEARS OF EXPERIENCE in a second phase, identifying further implementation priorities including funding opportunities and roles and Cambridge Systematics 2004— responsibilities for partner agencies. Present Florida Department of Transportation (DOT) District 6 Kittelson & Associates 1993 - 2004 Corridor Studies. Mr. Haliburton supported planning elements of the 95 Express managed lane implementation, OFFICE LOCATION compiling lessons learned from the first phase of deployment, developing the monitoring plan framework and reporting on Fort Lauderdale, FL performance following opening of the first phase of the project. He has also coordinated with District 6 on bi-annual PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV)system analyses since 2001. He also worked on the 1-195 Pace study to evaluate new Chartered Engineer(Engineering interchange ramp options for Miami Avenue and participated Council UK) in a Design District Charrette. Institute of Civil Engineers, Member Chattanooga Passenger Rail Feasibility Study. Mr. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Haliburton served as project manager for this study to USA, Associate Member examine restoring passenger rail to this historically railroad- oriented town. A number of alternatives were developed to link existing and developing activity centers in the region following underutilized rail rights-of-way, and were evaluated based on approximately a dozen evaluation measures that correlate with project goals and objectives. The plan CAMBRIDGE 130 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com PETER HALIBURTON, CENG (continued) recommended a program of station area land use enhancements and infrastructure investments, non- motorized routes and trails, and connecting transit enhancements to support the ridership levels required to justify a rail transit investment in the study corridor. Detailed density projections and analysis were developed for five stations along the project alignment using CommunityViz. Nashville Area MPO Transit Planning Support. For the Nashville Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Mr. Haliburton served as Project Principal for a three-year general support contract supporting the MPO in development of their long range regional transportation plan update. Tasks included transit planning and research, development of a Transit Competitiveness Index tool to support transit project prioritization and service planning in the region, and system preservation funding analysis. Atlanta Regional Commission Transit Committee Support. Mr. Haliburton served as project manager for a contract to support the Regional Transit Committee as part of their long-term transit improvement plan for a 20-county region. Tasks included inventory of the regional transit facilities and fleet resources, creation of a database of routes and facilities to be used in identifying operating efficiency improvements, update and refinement of the Unconstrained Transit Aspiration Plan and documentation of project priorities, providing transit governance support on regional transit governance,and creation of a regional on-line interactive route- planning map and a paper version for regional transit travel. Florida DOT District 4 Transportation Planning and Multimodal Corridor Studies. Since 1996, Mr. Haliburton has supported the District Planning and Environmental Management Office managing PACE and Planning and Environmental Management (PLEMO) studies and Project Traffic tasks throughout all five counties. He has also reviewed project documents, including Design Traffic, Development of Regional Impacts (DRI), Interchange Justification Reports (IJR), Interchange Operational Analysis Reports (10AR), etc. Mr. Haliburton served as Project Manager for several Districtwide contracts for Florida DOT District 4 that included tasks to identify and prioritize safety and mobility enhancement projects on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)connectors, and to calculate travel time values and user costs for automobile, truck and transit travelers. He supported planning and monitoring elements of the 1-95 Express managed lane implementation, compiling lessons learned from the first phase of deployment, developing the monitoring plan framework and reporting on performance following opening of the first phase of the project. Florida DOT District 4 Districtwide Transit Corridor Project Support. Mr. Haliburton currently is managing a district-wide transit planning support contract with Florida DOT District 4, focused on project development for three potential Federal Transit Administration (FTA) New Starts fixed guideway transit projects in the Fort Lauderdale area. These include the Florida East-Coast Railway (FEC) Corridor Study, Central Broward Transit, and Downtown Fort Lauderdale Streetcar. Tasks have included project coordination efforts between three study teams; reviewing and evaluating project financing mechanisms used by similar projects around the country; developing the scope of work and staff-hour estimate for a Refined Alternatives Analysis (AA) and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS); review of scores of planning and environmental documents and financial plans, visualization for a downtown transit intermodal center; developing project management templates; researching FTA project development timelines for several prominent national transit efforts and a comprehensive access-egress mode survey for Tri-Rail coordinated with an on-board survey. Mr. Haliburton also participated in a Value Engineering study for the Fort Lauderdale Airport-Seaport Peoplemover study on behalf of FDOT. CAMBRIDGE 131 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com PETER HALIBURTON, CENG (continued) GoTriangle, North Carolina — Evaluated the financial feasibility of a $2 billion light rail system in North Carolina. Developed a 20-year cash flow projection model to determine future financial position, assess project risks, and evaluate overall financial capacity to deliver and operate the system. Provided insightful analysis of financial statements and worked with agency staff integrating financial, operating, and capital data. Co-authored the final report for the Federal Transit Administration. North Carolina DOT, 1-95 Economic Impact Study—Cambridge Systematics led the study that examined the economic impacts of tolling the 1-95 corridor. Mr. Alvarado conducted a benchmark analysis of current transportation funding in North Carolina in comparison with neighboring states and evaluated potential revenue and financing options to advance the proposed corridor improvements on 195. Georgia Department of Transportation — Led the development of the long range revenue forecast for the updated the Statewide Transportation Plan (SWTP). Examined financial statements, historical revenue trends, and validated assumptions with economic and industry trends and designed a user-friendly excel tool to provide users a long-term perspective of revenues with the ability to test the impact of different forecasting assumptions. Transit Cooperative Research Program— Provided research and due diligence support for the guidebook developed by Cambridge Systematics to enable transit systems to meaningfully evaluate alternative local and regional funding mechanisms and assist those seeking to add new or increase existing sources of revenue to achieve greater funding stability and support improved public transportation. Mr. Alvarado- Vazquez conducted a literature review about innovative funding mechanisms adopted by transit agencies at the national and international level and evaluated how different funding strategies have performed based on several evaluation criteria, including stability and adequacy of funding sources. CAMBRIDGE 132 SYSTEMATICS F www.camsys.com THOMAS K. HARRINGTON, AICP Senior Associate Cambridge Systematics, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Harrington is the Regional Manager of Cambridge Systematics' Transportation Planning and Management business line in the Washington, D.C. office. Mr. Harrington has more than two decades of professional experience in transportation planning EDUCATION in the public and private sectors. Prior to joining Cambridge Systematics, Mr. Harrington served as Director of Long-Range M.R.P., Regional Planning, University of Planning for the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1996 (WMATA) in Washington, D.C. where he led the transit planning function in the areas of corridor planning and project development, B.S., Systems Engineering, University of regional planning and coordination, capital needs planning, Virginia, 1990 systems planning and analysis, and access planning. Transit Systems Planning. Mr. Harrington has served as AREAS OF EXPERTISE Project Manager for a number of multimodal transit systems plans evaluating high-capacity transit options including: Transit Systems Planning Alternatives Analysis • VIA Long-Range Transit Implementation Plan —evaluation Project Prioritization and identification of high-capacity transit corridors and Strategic Planning and Analysis development of updated implementation plan for San Antonio, Multimodal Transportation Planning Texas region; Urban and Regional Planning • Regional Transit System Plan — 30+-year vision for high- PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS capacity, multimodal transit in the Washington, D.C.region;and • D.C. Transit Future System Plan and Alternatives American Institute of Certified Planners and Analysis — multicorridor system plan for streetcar and rapid American Planning Association, Member Transportation Research Board, Member bus in the District of Columbia. of AP015 Committee (Transit Capacity Transit Corridor Planning and Project Development. and Quality of Service Manual) Mr. Harrington has served as Project Manager or Technical Lead Transit Cooperative Research Program for a number of bus and rail planning efforts including system (TCRP)A-15C Panel Chair, Transit plans, corridor studies, feasibility studies, New Starts project Capacity and Quality of Service Manual justification and financial plans, and service implementation plans: (3rtl Ed.) American Public Transportation Association, Leadership APTA Class of • Virginia DRPT 1-95/1-395 Transit/TDM Plan — 2007-2008 comprehensive plan for transit and TDM improvements in this major commuting corridor in northern Virginia; • VIA South/West Connector Corridor Analysis and Implementation Plan—alternatives analysis of high-capacity transit options that led to an implementation plan for bus rapid transit, in San Antonio, Texas; • MWCOG Regional Bus Parking, Staging and Layover Study — assessment of the bus parking and layover facility needs for commuter and motorcoach bus operations in Washington, DC; CAMBRIDGE 133 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com THOMAS K. HARRINGTON, AICP (continued) • CATA Michigan/Grand River BRT Environmental Assessment — environmental assessment for this Small Starts bus rapid transit project in Lansing, Michigan; • River North-Streeterville Transit Corridor Study—alternatives analysis of high-capacity transit options,focused on bus rapid transit options, in Chicago, Illinois; • Georgia Avenue Metro Extra — planning and implementation of WMATA's first limited-stop Rapid Bus line, the Georgia Avenue Metro Extra; • Dulles Corridor Metrorail Extension — provided critical input to the successful New Starts grant award for the Dulles Corridor project in the areas of ridership forecasts, user benefits, operating plans, and financial requirements; • Station Access and Capacity Study—assessment of systemwide core capacity needs for the Metrorail system to meet growing ridership demand; and • Rush+ Metrorail— implementation of the Rush+ Metrorail service realignment which included service changes, signage and map changes, and customer information. Strategic Planning and Project Prioritization. Mr. Harrington has developed strategic plans and processes for prioritizing capital improvement projects including: • House Bill 2 Implementation—provided support to the Virginia Office of the Transportation Secretary to develop a performance-based prioritization process for funding projects in the Six-Year Improvement Program; • 2011-2020 Capital Needs Inventory — identified more than $11 billion in capital improvement needs, helped WMATA obtain new Federal funding, and fostered a new process for prioritizing capital programming decisions; and • WMATA Momentum Strategic Plan—2013 strategic plan identified key expansion needs and linked future capital improvements to a new strategic framework. Multimodal Transportation Planning. Mr. Harrington has developed long-range, comprehensive transportation plans at the regional and local levels that analyzed highway and transit system improvements: • Huntington Area Transportation Study— For the Fairfax County Department of Transportation, Mr. Harrington is currently serving as project manager of this evaluation of multimodal transportation system alternatives for resolving existing and future traffic congestion; and • Regional Transportation Planning—Morgantown Transportation Study, Charleston Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Montgomery County, Maryland long-range transportation plan, and San Juan Regional Transportation Plan. CAMBRIDGE 134 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com KEVIN W. TILBURY Senior Associate Cambridge Systematics, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Tilbury has nearly 20 years of integrated multimodal transportation and land use planning for government agency partners at the local, regional and state levels in Tennessee, the southeast and EDUCATION nationally. He excels and communicating complex data and analysis to non-technical stakeholder M.S.P., Urban and Regional Planning, audiences. His work in Middle Tennessee includes Florida State University, 1997 major corridor studies for the Nashville MPO and B.S., Geography, Florida State University, TDOT that take an integrated approach to mobility, 1995 including private vehicles, transit, walking and cycling. His project experience spans MPO long range transportation plans, regional scenario planning and AREAS OF EXPERTISE visioning,transit corridor and station area planning and complete streets and active transportation. His interest Transit Planning and passion lies in understanding how the realms of Multimodal and Active Transportation land use and transportation can complement each Transportation and Land Use other to create livable and functional places. Land Use Modeling Chattanooga Rail Implementation Plan. Mr. Tilbury led the station area and active transportation PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS components of a Rail Implementation Study for the City of Chattanooga. He was responsible for the creation of a land use model to evaluate the land use and Member,American Planning Associate economic development impacts of transit, development of station area plans and multimodal Member,American Institute of Certified connections and a conceptual plan for an active Planners transportation network linking each station area. Southeast Area Transportation and Land Use Study. For the Nashville Area MPO, Mr.Tilbury was the principal planner on a study of long term transportation and land use options for the Nashville to Murfreesboro corridor, one of Middle Tennessee's fastest growing and congested corridors. He used the MPO's land use model to create four distinct scenarios and the evaluation of their implications for transit, auto travel, walking and cycling, public infrastructure, environmental impacts and quality of life. Gadsden Transit Plan. Mr. Tilbury led a comprehensive plan for the evolution of transit service in the City of Gadsden, Alabama. Recommendations include short route operational enhancements to improve efficiency an on-time performance to long term strategic corridors for new fixed route service. CAMBRIDGE 135 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com KEVIN TILBURY (continued) Eastern Shore Transit Development Plan. Mr. Tilbury was the principal planner for a comprehensive study of public transportation in Baldwin County, Alabama. The study looks at a range of mobility options, including the introduction of fixed route transit service in the county. 1-69 Corridor Transit Alternatives Analysis. Mr. Tilbury led the technical analysis for a Small Starts analysis of the 1-69 corridor from DeSoto County in North Mississippi to Memphis, Tennessee. Options included various iterations of bus rapid transit and express bus service. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Mid-Range Plan. Mr. Tilbury prepared a 10-year strategic vision for transit for the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority.The plan goes beyond typical transit development plans, which cover short term, operationally oriented planning horizons, to identify strategic transit corridors and new service territory. Space Coast Area Transit Development Plan. Mr. Tilbury led a major update of SCAT's 10 year TDP and Vision Plan in Brevard County, FL. He used FDOT-supported TBEST demand estimation tool to evaluate various service expansion scenarios. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Market Research Study. Mr. Tilbury led a comprehensive market research study for PSTA in Pinellas County, Florida. The effort included design and implementation of an on-board survey, focus groups and a telephone survey. The results helped PSTA make important customer-responsive changes to their system. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Capital Facility Needs Assessment. PSTA operates on a pulse, or timed transfer system in which numerous transfer facilities are distributed throughout Pinellas County. Mr. Tilbury performed a comprehensive assessment of PSTA's systemwide facilities across such factors as capacity, safety and convenience. Florida TOD Design Guidelines. Mr. Tilbury played a key role in early efforts to develop guidelines for transit oriented development in Florida. Efforts include research on best practices and development of a station area typology. The guidelines are used as a framework for local governments as they shape and optimize land use around new and existing rail stations. Birmingham Regional Transit Alternatives Analysis. Mr. Tilbury was the lead planner for a comprehensive evaluation of regional transit options for Birmingham's major corridors. The analysis includes an evaluation of each corridor and transit option against New Starts criteria. CAMBRIDGE 136 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com PENG ZHU, P.E., PH.D. Senior Associate Cambridge Systematics, Inc. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Dr. Peng Zhu has 10 years of experience in traffic EDUCATION simulation, transportation planning and operations. He has worked on various projects of subarea and corridor Ph.D., Transportation Engineering planning, transportation plans, multimodal Florida International University, Florida 2008 transportation studies, Intelligent Transportation Systems planning and implementation studies, traffic B.S., Civil Engineering and revenue studies, and traffic simulation studies. Southeast University, China, 2000 FDOT District 4 System Planning General Planning AREAS OF EXPERTISE Consultant. Dr. Zhu is the project manager of this contract. He is responsible for regional demand model applications and support; Development of Regional Transportation Planning Impacts (DRI) and Project Development and Transportation Operations Environment (PD&E) reviews; development and review Traffic Simulation of design traffic tasks; Level of Service (LOS) analysis, Transportation Data Analysis mobility performance measures (MPM), review of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Interchange request documents such as Justification Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Report (IJR), Interchange Modification Report (IMR), and Interchange Operational Analysis Report (IOAR). YEARS OF EXPERIENCE City of Hallandale Beach 2030 Transportation 10 Master Plan Dr Zhu was a key staff of this project with the focus on future traffic volume development, intersection LOS studies, and alternative evaluations. PROFRESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS In addition, Mr. Zhu developed an alternative schedule of traffic impact fee for the City of Hallandale Beach. Professional Engineer Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Simulation Study. Florida #76297, 2013 The purpose of this project was to test alternative transit Minnesota #50754, 2013 operation strategies on Oakland Park Boulevard. Dr. Texas #102494, 2008 Zhu was the project manager of the Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Simulation study. His role included making data collection plan, coordinating data LOCATION collection effort, data verification, data warehouse management, team maintenance and management, Fort Lauderdale, Florida traffic and transit operational analysis, traffic signal modeling, evaluation and optimization, microsimulation modeling and calibration toward both traffic and transit operational conditions, alternative analysis, documentation and presentation. Sample Road Queue Jump Study. The Purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate bus queue jump CAMBRIDGE 137 SYSTEMATICS www.camsys.com PENG ZHU (continued) and transit signal priority alternatives to be implemented along the Sample Road corridor in Broward County. Dr. Zhu was the project manager of this effort. He was responsible for developing data collection scope, supervising data collection, developing and implementing a ranking system for candidate locations, developing Synchro and VISSIM models for detailed evaluation, and meetings and workshops. FDOT District 4 Transportation System Management and Operations (TSM&O). The Florida DOT developed a statewide Transportation System Management and TSM&O program expecting to address the growing congestion problem within the state. Dr. Zhu was key staff for this project. His role included intersection, corridor, and network operational analysis, data mining, GPS data management and projection, database construction and maintenance. SCAG 1-210 Corridor Study. Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) was looking to improving freeway operations for the 1-210 corridor and developing a standard corridor planning template for the California DOT and other agencies. Dr. Zhu was a key staff for this effort. His role included VISSIM model development, traffic analysis, scenario testing and alternative analysis. Georgia DOT Atlanta Radial Highways Microsimulation Models. The objective of this study was to develop a series of models for the GADOT radial highway system for identification of future deficiencies, alternative development and evaluation. Dr. Zhu was responsible for developing part of the VISSIM models, performing model calibration and conducting alternative evaluations. Colorado C-470 Corridor Phase I Managed Lane Traffic and Revenue Study. The purpose of the study was to help Douglas County to analyze potentials and risks in terms of traffic and revenue of a managed lane system alternatives proposed on the C-470 corridor. Dr. Zhu was responsible for developing the entire VISSIM model including modules of manage lane operations, dynamic toll pricing algorithm and scripting, zoning. His role also included post-processing procedure and performance measure development, as well as operational analysis and revenue projections. His was also responsible for Synchro analysis of the entire sub-area network and assistance in demand model application and ODME process. Washington DOT Eastside Corridor Traffic and Revenue Study. The purpose of this project was to undertake an independent traffic and revenue study for the proposed high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes on 1-405 and SR-167. Dr. Zhu's was responsible for model and data review, inspection of future travel demand, analyzing stated preference surveys, managed lane traffic and operation modeling, developing analysis tools, risk assessment for traffic and revenue. Southeast Florida Road and Transit User Cost Calculator Update. This study developed travel time values and vehicle operating costs of various travel markets, modes, vehicle types. Findings of this study can be applied to benefit-cost analysis of transportation system improvements, evaluation of various operating scenarios, and analysis of multimodal and intermodal projects. Dr. Zhu was the project manager of this study. He developed a series of stand-alone tools for vehicle operating costs and travel time values of different markets within the local, state, and nationwide levels based on a great variety of data sources, inputs from different agencies, and market research. This tool provided a series of key inputs to assess monetary values of travels for practices such as regional demand model application. CAMBRIDGE 138 SYSTEMATICS Clow Parc' TEAM BIOS Steven Nerayoff I Founder and CEO / Board Member • Acts as CEO, direct liaison between the Board and management. • Serial entrepreneur who started 7 + companies. • Raised over $100 million for his own and other private companies. • Founder & CEO of Maple Ventures, a Venture Capital firm primarily focused on emerging technologies including consumer Internet companies, socially conscious enterprises, and emerging payment and currency technologies. • Leading proponent of the Bitcoin 2.0 Movement and has been partnering with investment bankers from firms such as Barclays and Morgan Stanley on how the BlockChain can revolutionize the financial industry. • In cooperation with Joe Grundfest, Steven structured the second largest crowdfunding in history for Ethereum (a Bitcoin 2.0 company), to create a totally new structure that would work for BlockChain oriented companies. Approximately 10 other companies have now copied this new model. • Founded Freedom Eldercare, one of the country's largest private-pay home health care providers. This structured deal was the first company in the home healthcare industry to be sold to a private equity firm and won M&A deal of the year in 2009 by M&A Advisor. • Founded iOffer.com, the Web's leading negotiation-based person-to-person marketplace and third largest marketplace on the Internet, behind eBay and Amazon.com. • Other companies he has founded and co-founded include: Fleetwood Owen (now Cooper Owen, the world's largest celebrity memorabilia company) and eWanted.com (the Internet's leading marketplace for person-to-person "want ads"). • Steven began his professional journey as an attorney with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, where his practice involved technology, M&A, structured finance transactions, tax and corporate work. • Steven has a JD from Tulane University and a Masters of Law in Taxation from New York University. Tom Wong I Chief Technology Officer • 22 years of experience in the parking, transportation, and telecom industries as engineering executive. • Created a revolutionary system design, which resulted in 18 US patents along with a number of additional pending patents. Progressively demonstrated system utility by creating proof-of- concepts and beta pilots with equipment installed on-street and functional. • Vice President of Engineering at Photo Violation Technologies — Guided PVT from one-off prototype stage to post-revenue phase with multiple 24x7 live operating locations across North America, each with a municipal mesh Wi-Fi infrastructure deployed. Launched two new products and made significant contribution towards company going public. Company was nominated by IBM for BCTIA "Best of IT" and "Most Promising Startup" awards. • Director of Engineering at Novax Industries, overseeing the development of Traffic Signal Controllers, Traffic Cabinets, and wireless Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Systems. Mr. Wong led the team in creating the innovative multi-million dollar TSP system and deployed it at a number of transit companies in cities such as Chicago, Vancouver and Edmonton, totaling $5 million in contract value. The system achieved Final Acceptance in every implementation, and the value of the system was further affirmed by the establishment of Support and Services Contracts worth annually approximately a tenth of the total capital expenditure. 139 #.‘ CIau Parc" • Held a number of other senior management positions in the Telecom Industry, and has worked at companies such as MCI WorldCom and Nortel. • Uniserve, a public, National Telecommunications Service Provider with 300,000 subscribers - operates multiple call centers with 150 seats in total. Key role in acquisition of a VoIP company in order for Uniserve to begin offering high-margin high-growth products. Achieved improved IT infrastructure efficiency and system availability through virtualization technologies. Reduced customer-impacting network and system problems by 70%. • Reduced false alarms within VoIP network by 80% at Newcross Technologies through innovative Alarm Verification and Alarm Correlation Engines, each handling up to 2000 SNMP alarms per second. • Contributed to MCI WorldCom's expansion into 4 new countries. Reduced network downtime by 20% as a result of conceiving and implementing a unique protocol-independent management system using SCADA • Reduced MTTP (Mean-Time-To-Repair) by 30% as a result of Alarm and Remote Test Management System implemented at Network Operations Center (NOC). • Mr. Wong is a registered Professional Engineer, with a Bachelor's Degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of British Columbia, and is co-inventor of 17 US Patents. • He also has valid pilot licenses in US and Canada. 140 • ELAND Engineering Excellence Mr. Gaudio is a Senior ITS Engineer for Eland Engineering. He has 7 years of experience in management and data collection for a variety of ITS projects including overseeing the ramp signaling system in Miami-Dade County, creating and modifying tolling parameters for the Interstate 95 (1-95) High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes(Express Lanes) in Miami-Dade County. and designing incident management and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) plans for the 1-95 Express • Lanes. He was also responsible for a comprehensive amount of tasks including: 1-95 Express Lanes Phase 11, Broward&Miami-Dade Counties, 15 Miles, FOOT D4, D6& FTE — ITS Lead responsible for providing post design services, providing D4, D6 and FTE with plans review, RFI and shop drawing review, system integration and testing plans review. 07/2016 — Rossi Gaudio, P.E. current(Reference:Donovan Pessoa, P.E., FDOT D4 Consultant Management, 954-777-4442) ITS Engineer 1-95 Express Lanes, Phase Ill, Broward County, 29 Miles, FOOT D4 — ITS Specialist Education responsible for assisting in the development of the Corridor ITS Master Plan, Request for Proposal M.S.C.E, Florida International (RFP) ITS and toll technical functional requirements. and TAG/TRC support. 7/2016 - current University, 08/2006-12/2008 (Reference:Robert Bostian, P.E., FDOT Project Manager, 954-777-4427) B.S.Applied Mathematics Alderson-Broaddus College District Wide ITS General Consultant, Broward County, FDOT D4- Miscellaneous ITS Design 08/2001-05/2005 Services: SR80 Hooker Highway Safety Improvements; Replacement Project of ITS Equipment along 1-95/1-75/1-595, 1-95 St. Lucie County Widening ITS Project, 1-95 Ramp Metering Study Project, 1-95 Atlantic Avenue Project, 1-95 Spanish River Interchange Project, SR25/US27 ITS Professional Project, and US 27 VSLS Project. The design elements include electrical power systems, fiber Registrations optic communications, solar systems. ramp metering, full color Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), Professional Engineer— Detection Control Systems (DCS). Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS), Highway Advisory Civil/Transportation Radio (HAR), Electronic Toll Collection (ETC), Closed Circuit Television (CCTV), Microwave Florida, No. 81659 Vehicle Detection Stations(MVDS), Integration and Testing. 07/2016—current(Reference: Dong 08/29/2016 Chen, FDOT D4 ITS Manager, 954-847-2785) Professional Engineer— Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Operations, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, Civil/Transportation FDOT D6 — ITS Traffic Analyst that provided support for Ramp Signaling Operations and Texas, No. 119054 management in FDOT District Six. Responsibilities included conducting traffic studies and analysis 12/16/2014 in FDOT District Six, primarily using roadway detector data in Miami-Dade County. Mr. Gaudio was also responsible for managing multiple contracts associated with Florida Department of Advanced MOT,Cert. No.4513 Transportation (FOOT) District Six Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Operations contract, which included the Road Ranger (Service Patrol), Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL). 800 MHz IMSA Field Traffic Signal Level Radio, and Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) contracts. He led all Traffic Incident II Management (TIM) meetings. activities and operations, under the supervision of the client and management. Mr. Gaudio also assisted in Scope of Services development for various contracts. Employment History (Reference:Javier Rodriguez, P.E., FDOT D6 Operations, 305-640-7307) Eland Engineering, Inc. 07/2016-current 1-95 Express Lanes Phase 1, Miami-Dade County, 7 Miles, FDOT D6—Task Lead responsible for analyzing and modifying tolling procedures/parameters for the 1-95 Express Lanes: managing AECOM Technical Services, and implementing Traffic Incident Management procedures for the 1-95 Express Lanes; responsible 9/2009—07/2016 for managing the statewide Express Lanes Tolling software that uses a dynamic tolling structure which is based on traffic density (TD) and a Level of Service (LOS) table. Mr. Gaudio also Location conducted in depth analysis of client reports on quality control and presented them to the client on 3323 W. Commercial Blvd a consistent basis. (Reference:Javier Rodriguez,P.E.,FOOT D6 Operations, 305-640-7307) Suite 110 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Fort Lauderdale,Florida Rossi Gaudio 1/2 141 L=1�Ami Engineering Excellence Ramp Signal System Operations, Miami-Dade County, FDOT D6—Task Lead responsible for the ramp signal operations and management in Miami-Dade County, Florida. This included analyzing roadway detector data to take a proactive approach to turning on of the ramp signals as well as modifying minimum/maximum metering rates to achieve a balance between arterial and interstate traffic. (Reference:Javier Rodriguez,P.E.,FDOT D6 Operations,305-640-7307) 1-95 Express Lanes Phase Il, Broward & Miami-Dade Counties, 15 Miles, FDOT D4 & D6—Task Lead responsible for creating and implementing tolling procedures/parameters for 1-95 Express Lanes Phase II. Mr. Gaudio also led the development of the 1-95 Express Lanes Phase II Incident Management Plan which provided recommendations for FDOT Districts 4 & 6 in determining the amount of incident management resources needed to service the Express Lanes. (Reference:Javier Rodriguez, P.E.,FDOT D6 Operations, 305-640-7307) Traffic Incident Management (TIM), Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FDOT D6 — Oversaw the Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Program for the FDOT in Miami-Dade and Monroe County, Florida. This involves presenting updated incident management, construction, and upcoming roadway project information to first responder agencies, such as fire rescue agencies, law enforcements agencies, and tow truck agencies to minimize clearance time for incidents. (Reference: Javier Rodriguez, P.E.,FDOT D6 Operations,305-640-7307) Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) Program, Miami-Dade County, FDOT D6—Task Lead responsible for managing the Rapid Incident Scene Clearance (RISC) Program (Heavy Duty Towing Incentive Program). This included invoicing, conducting Post Incident Analysis(PIA) meetings,and analyzing crash data on state roadways to determine if RISC needed to expand to major arterial state roadways. (Reference:Javier Rodriguez,P.E.,FDOT D6 Operations,305-640-7307) Fort Lauderdale,Florida Rossi Gaudio 2/2 142 ELAND Engineering Excellence Mr. Qian is the principal and founder of Eland Engineering. He has 20 years of experience in project management, engineering, planning, design, construction and maintenance in Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS). As the project manager for FDOT District 4 ITS General Consultant contract for the past 10 years, he has assisted FDOT in the successful rollout of extensive ITS deployment and express lanes programs in the District. 0'44— District Wide ITS General Consultant, Broward County, FDOT D4 — Project Manager responsible for all major ITS projects!initiatives for D4 ITS program in various aspects of planning, BO QIAN,P.E. design, system integration, construction, operations, and maintenance. Key accomplishments Project Manager includes authoring over 30 RFP packages,for a total of approximately$180 million of construction values in ITS infrastructures, to support extensive rollout of ITS and express lanes deployment Education projects, and the development of various standard operating guidelines (SOG) and technical M.S.Computer Science documents for ITS planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance. 11/2006— current Florida Atlantic University, (Reference:Dong Chen,FDOT D4 ITS Manager, 954-847-2785) 2003 1-75 Express Lanes, Segment A, B, C, D & E, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, 15 miles, Graduate Courses FDOT D4, D6 & FTE—Consultant ITS lead responsible for the development of the corridor wide University of California, Los ITS Master Plan and technical functional requirements,assisting the bid proposal review, providing Angeles, 1997 post design support, and providing coordination with D4, D6 and FTE in reviewing and recommending responses to the request for information and project submittals. 12/2011—current M.S. Civil Engineering (Reference: Vanita Saini,P.E.,FDOT D4 Consultant Management,954-777-4468) University of Connecticut, 1995 1-95 Express Lanes Phase II, Broward&Miami-Dade Counties, 15 Miles, FDOT D4, D6&FTE — Consultant ITS Lead responsible for developing the ITS technical functional requirements for B.S. Civil Engineering design- build, integration, testing and training of 1-95 Managed Lanes project Phase II. 8/2007— Southeast University, 1992 current(Reference:Donovan Pessoa,P.E., FDOT D4 Consultant Management, 954-777-4442) Professional Certifications ATMS and ITS Broward Boulevard Design in Broward County, FDOT D4— ITS Senior Project Professional Engineer Civil Engineer responsible for ATMS and Signal fiber optic communication network subsystem including Florida, 66018 both ITS and signal cabinets, Power subsystem, Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) camera traffic 03/23/200707 monitoring subsystem, Microwave Vehicle Detection system (MVDS), Bluetooth vehicle detection, Automated Vehicle Identification (AVI) and Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) subsystem. 10/2015— Professional Engineer Civil current(Reference:Ronald Wallace,P.E.,FDOT D4 Project Manager, 954-777-4641) Ohio, No.68763 ATCS and ITS PGA Boulevard Design in Palm Beach County, FDOT D4—ITS Senior Project 01/04/2004 Engineer responsible for ATCS and fiber optic communication network subsystem, Closed Circuit Microsoft Certified Television (CCTV) camera traffic monitoring subsystem, Microwave Vehicle Detection system Professional(MCP#2780612) (MVDS), Power subsystem, Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) subsystem and Adaptive Traffic Control System. 9/2015 — current (Reference: Vanita Saini, P.E., FDOT D4 Consultant Employment History Management, 954-777-4468) Eland Engineering ATMS and ATCS Pines Boulevard in Broward County,FDOT D4—ITS Senior Project Engineer 10/2009—current responsible for developing the ITS technical functional requirements for design-build, integration, Gannet Fleming Nanus testing and training of ATMS/ATCS fiber optic communication network subsystem, Closed Circuit 11/2006—6/2010 Television (CCTV) camera traffic monitoring subsystem, Microwave Vehicle Detection system (MVDS), Bluetooth vehicle detection, Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) subsystem and Adaptive HNTB Traffic Control System. 10/2015 — current (Reference: Auraliz Benitez, P.E., FDOT D4 612004—11/2006 Consultant Management,954-777-4346) Parsons Brinckerhoff 10/1999—6/2004 Fort Lauderdale,Florida Bo Qian, 1/2 143 ELAND Engineering Excellent' 1-95 Ramp Metering Feasibility Study, Broward&Palm Beach Counties, 24 miles, FDOT D4—Task Manager responsible for the evaluation and recommendation of the detection technology. CCTV analysis, signal controller and cabinet, software and algorithm, and communication infrastructure and equipment for the ramp metering applications. Also responsible for the development of 30% conceptual layout plans for each selected ramp metering location. 11/2012 — 5/2014 (Reference: Daniel Smith, FDOT D4 ITS Operations Manager, 954-847-2633) 1-595 Public Private Partnership (PPP) Project, Broward County, 10.5 Miles, FDOT D4 — Consultant ITS lead responsible for developing the ITS Master Plan and technical requirements for the design. construction, operation and maintenance of 1-595 ITS to support transportation management and operations of express lanes and the general purpose lanes on 1-595 corridor. As part of this $1.7 billion 1-595 widening and reconstruction project, 1-595 ITS includes a fiber optic communication network subsystem, a Reversible Express Lanes Access Control subsystem, a CCTV subsystem, a DMS subsystem, a MVDS subsystem. and an ETC subsystem. 11/2007-2/2010(Reference:Paul Lampley, P.E., FDOT D4 Project Manager, 954-845-9552) Palm Beach County 1-95 ITS Design-Build, Palm Beach County, 38 Miles, FDOT D4-Consultant Project Manager responsible for developing the complete bid package for this $24 million ITS design-build project, including the development of scope of service. technical specifications. scheduling and engineering and construction cost estimate. 5/2007— 8/2011 (Reference: Dong Chen, FDOT D4 ITS Manager, 954-847-2785.) 1-75 Alligator Alley ITSS Project, Broward and Collier Counties, 75 Miles, FDOT D4 & D1 - ITS Consultant responsible for developing the Concept of Operations and ITS technical functional requirements for design- build, integration, testing and training of this $4.2 million ITS design-build project, which includes the design, integration and construction of 9 speed warning system and 7 fog detection system along the 1-75 corridors in Broward and Collier Counties. 8/2009 — 12/2014 (Reference: Tony Mendoza, former FDOT D4 ITS Maintenance Manager, 954-448-0649) 1-95 ITS, Northern 3 Counties of Martin, St.Lucie, &Indian River, 71 Miles, FDOT D4—Consultant Project Manager responsible for developing the complete bid package for this $26 million ITS design-build project. including developing the scope for the request of proposal, technical specifications, scheduling and engineering and construction cost estimate, reviewing the bid proposals and recommending the selection criteria; oversight of the construction management. reviewing and recommending responses to the request for information (RFI) and project submittals from contractors. 1/2007 - 12/2010 (Reference: Dong Chen, FDOT D4 ITS Manager, 954-847-2785) Freeway Ramp Traffic Detection System, Broward County, 100 Miles, FDOT D4—Project Manager and Engineer of Record(EOR) for all aspects of the design for Microwave Vehicle Detection Station (MVDS) project for the ramps covering 100 miles of the freeway in Broward County. Tasks included the preparation of ITS construction plans, technical specifications for subsystems and components. engineer cost estimate and construction schedule and preparation of ITS integration plan and with SunGuide TMC Software. 8/2008- 6/2009(Reference:Dong Chen, FDOT D4 ITS Manager, 954-847-2785) 1-75/1-595 ITS Deployment Phase I& II CEI, Broward County, FDOT D4—Senior Project Engineer responsible for directing this$18 million highly complex and specialized construction engineering administration and inspection program; responsible for all aspects of the design, integration and construction of 50 miles new fiber optic backbones, 98 CCTV cameras, and 238 MVDS along the 1-75/1-595 corridors; plans and organizes the work of subordinate and staff members; develops and review policies, methods. practices, and procedures and review programs for conformance with Department standards. 6/2004 - 11/2006 (Reference: Dong Chen, FDOT D4 ITS Manager, 954-847-2785) Incident Tracking Database System, Broward County, FDOT D4 - Project Manager and lead programmer responsible for the full life cycle for the design and developing the web-based Incident Tracking System; authored all major technical documents (software design document. user requirements, software testing plans and software training materials and user manuals; also responsible for system integration and management for web server. Cisco Firewalls and SQL Server 2000 database. The system will allow the user to view the incident data through the internet and permit authorized users to add, modify. and edit data from remote locations. 5/2001-9/2003(Reference: Gaetano Francese, former FDOT D4 ITS TIM Manager, 954-847-2785) Fort Lauderdale,Florida Bo Qian.2 2 144 �V k .. Jeremy Kiop, AICP "' .. I Principal A., e i About Selected Publications and Jeremy Klop,AICP has professional experience including a Presentations wide range of multimodal planning and implementation projects across the United States.Through his combined Transportation Planning Handbook—Chapter 21 Pedestrian expertise in travel demand forecasting and multimodal &Bicycle Planning,with Matthew Ridgway,Institute of traffic operations,he has helped implement transportation Transportation Engineers,2009 projects in diverse settings such as high mountain Main TOD Trip Generation—State of the Practice Methods, Streets,economically challenged Midwestern towns, Colorado Wyoming ITE,Colorado WTS,and Rocky biomedical campuses,4,000+acre infill communities, Mountain ITS Spring Transportation Symposium,April thriving urban downtowns,and small transit villages 2008 throughout the Western US. He is known for working Complete Streets,presentation to Rocky Mountain Land effectively with planning commissions,elected officials, Use Institute,March 2007 advocacy groups,and multiple city departments to gain Bridging the Gap:Integrating the Regional Model and consensus on complex transportation planning issues.He Microsimulation,TRB Annual Meeting Presentation, frequently lectures and trains practitioners on multimodal January 2006 planning and served as a chapter co-author for the ITE Transportation Planning Handbook.He is Principal-in- Project Experience Charge of the Mobility Plan 2035 for the City of Los Angeles,the Union Station Master Plan,and the Great Transportation Technology Strategy Implementation Streets initiative for the Mayor's office in the City of Los LADOT needed a consultant team to work across multiple Angeles. internal and external stakeholders,provide coordination and documentation,and help advance the goals of their Education transportation technology strategy.Fehr&Peers was Master of Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, selected to serve as a program manager,to implement the Chapel Hill, NC, 1999 beginning stages of LA's Urban Mobility in a Digital Age Bachelor of Science, Biology,Calvin College,Grand Rapids, plan,and develop continuity across a variety of initiatives MI, 1994 to ensure the maximum benefits are realized from innovative pilots and programs.Together with LADOT, Fehr&Peers is working to implement several of the key Affiliations recommendations from the transportation technology American Planning Association: Member strategy in FY2017. Work in this initial implementation American Planning Association—Colorado Chapter. Vice phase includes technical support for data sharing policies, President of Communications an inventory of available data,data analysis capacity Institute of Transportation Engineers:Member building,a customer bill of rights and metrics for transportation happiness,development of a project Professional Registration evaluation standard,and support for partnerships,grants, American Institute of Certified Planners,2003(018596) and pilot programs.Jeremy is PIC. F E H R '' P E E R S 600 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1050 Los Angeles I Walnut Creek I Denver I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Los Angeles,CA 90017 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San José I Seattle I Washington,DC (213)261-3050 145 Jeremy Klop, AICP Great Streets Corridors Benchmarking spaces have influenced the City.Our firm is conducting the The Fehr&Peers team is evaluating all 15 Great Streets management,training,scheduling,and logistics aspects of corridors.For each,we are exploring a host of metrics data collection, regardless of the entity collecting the data, related to public life and the goals of ED1.We are to meet established LADOT standards.Mr.Klop is PIC. assessing each corridor before and after project implementation to shed light on how the Great Streets Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority interventions have influenced their surroundings.We are (Metro)Active Transportation Strategic Plan also researching areas not slated to receive Great Streets Fehr&Peers prepared the Active Transportation Strategic enhancements.This establishes a baseline against which to Plan for Metro,which was used to build support and set compare the Great Streets corridors.We are completing funding levels for active transportation projects in LA's public life surveys on a sample of the 15 corridors.We successful sales tax initiative for transportation(Measure have developed a keen understanding of this survey M).The team's outreach efforts included a Technical process in our work with LADOT on the People St Advisory Committee;public meetings with local Evaluation project.Our firm is providing sound stakeholders;and meetings throughout LA County.The management;coordinating fieldwork;collecting, process of understanding the existing conditions included compiling,and analyzing data;and providing written extensive data assembly from multiple stakeholders,data documentation of our research.Our final reports will analysis,and the creation of visual displays and an include an online data visualization component. interactive Web mapping system to organize and communicate a complete picture of transportation issues City of LA Mobility Plan 2035 at each of 661 high-ridership Metro transit stops and Fehr&Peers led a team updating the General Plan stations.Fehr&Peers drew from this analysis to develop Mobility Element for the City of Los Angeles.From a an active transportation network with two key selection of alternative approaches,the City chose a components: multimodal layered-network approach with a context • sensitive overlay to update its street classification system. 1. The development of 20 prototypical Fehr&Peers is picking up where its LA Street Classification improvement plans and Benchmarking System study left off and working with 2. An inter jurisdictional bikeway network that the City to develop concepts for a layered network.Fehr& complements the transit access network Peers worked with the City to create new street standards based on the development of that layered network. Through an extensive social media campaign and a series The analysis of these elements supports the development of meetings and workshops, Fehr&Peers framed the of a list of local projects with regional benefit that improve • conversation in terms of transportation choices,where first and last mile connections to transit in order to options and tradeoffs are clearly defined to reflect both catalyze increased ridership on the transit network and aspirational goals and the constraints of conditions on the improve mobility choices across Los Angeles County.The ground.The team worked with the City to prepare a team also developed an inventory of the existing and Streetscape Manual that identifies improvements planned regional bikeway network,establishing network associated with each street type and addressed the development standards,defining a gap typology,and disconnects between policy goals and current street developing a methodology to identify gap closures.Fehr standards.Our team performed outreach and branding. &Peers considered innovative engineering and funding Mr. Klop is PM. strategies, in conjunction with Metro,to expedite improvements and encourage successful build-out of the bikeway network. Fehr&Peers also developed an People St Evaluation implementation plan that includes performance metrics, Fehr&Peers is evaluating all seven of the People St public benchmarks,and implementation strategies to assist spaces and up to five bicycle corrals for LADOT.For each decision makers with better understanding how these installation,we are employing a variety of data collection investments benefit Metro and the County.Jeremy was techniques and exploring a host of metrics related to PIC. public life.We are assessing each site before and after project implementation to shed light on how the People St Los Angeles Union Station Master Plan FE H R '' PEERS 600 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1050 Los Angeles I Walnut Creek I Denver I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Los Angeles,CA 90017 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San José I Seattle I Washington,DC (213)261-3050,146 Jeremy Klop, AICP Fehr&Peers provided expertise in all aspects of surface transportation and the relationship between transportation and land use.The multimodal approach included the interface between people arriving and connecting via all modes of travel and was focused on the experience and connection to the both the history and the future of this iconic station. Fehr&Peers worked working closely with staff and the team to provide a management plan for parking.Our involvement included transit(rail and bus), pedestrian and bicycle access enhancements,development trip generation analysis,and supporting alternatives development and evaluation for high speed rail integration. Mr. Klop is project manager. F E H R "' P E E R S 600 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1050 Los Angeles I Walnut Creek I Denver I Honolulu I Inland Empire I Oakland I Orange County I Sacramento Los Angeles,CA 90017 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Francisco I San José I Seattle I Washington,DC (213)261-3050,147 NNW Alex Rixey, AICP • Senior Transportation Planner 711 •Y� About Project Experience Alex has diverse project experience in travel demand modeling,transportation and parking studies, master plan Downtown Dallas 360 Plan Update and mobility element development,data analysis and The City of Dallas and Downtown Dallas,Inc.are visualization,and bikesharing system planning,with an undertaking an update to the Downtown Dallas 360 plan, emphasis on analyzing the effects of built environment which addresses issues of walkability,mobility,and urban and demographic characteristics on demand for all travel design,among others.Fehr&Peers DC is collaborating modes.Alex is proficient in the use of SAS,SPSS,and with Moore,Iacofano and Goltsman,Inc.to recommend ArcGIS software,and has combined his passions for Urban Mobility Principles,a Street Typology,and Signature quantitative analysis and bicycling by developing a Corridor design concepts to enhance streetscapes and station-level bike sharing ridership model.Alex has also mobility in Downtown Dallas.Fehr&Peers DC conducted recently worked to develop multimodal transportation the first small area validation of the North Central Texas performance measures that incorporate land use, Council of Governments'regional travel demand model, transportation,and accessibility factors for auto,transit, with Kevin's help,to reflect conditions in Downtown,using bicycle,and pedestrian modes as alternatives to the origin-destination big data from Streetlight to make traditional Level of Service metric. significant adjustments to model trip lengths and travel patterns within and to Downtown.The validated model will Education enable Fehr&Peers DC's analysis of the effects of the land use and transportation network changes proposed in the Bachelor of Science,Systems Engineering and Economics, Downtown Dallas 360 update.Alex is PM. University of Virginia,2006 Master of Arts,Urban Planning—Transportation Planning, M-NCPPC Tools Improvement Project University of California,Los Angeles,2011 Fehr&Peers DC led a team to develop an improved system for measuring Montgomery County's transportation system performance and prepare a strategic Registrations plan for incorporating recommended improvements to the current modeling framework.Fehr&Peers DC American Institute of Certified Planners#026745 collaborated with Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission staff to develop a suite of Affiliations multimodal transportation performance measures that address the County's stated land use and transportation American Planning Association:Member goals. Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals: Member Although a thorough compilation of the County's policy and planning documents revealed that the County's goals Institute of Transportation Engineers— embrace all aspects of a multimodal transportation system, Pedestrian and Bicycle Council:Vice Chair the County had not yet deployed the metrics and tools Complete Streets Council:Secretary needed to evaluate how land use and transportation Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition: decisions affect those goals.Fehr&Peers DC Planning Committee Member recommended a package of innovative performance FEHR j PEERS DC 1003KStreet te209 Suite 209 Washington,DC 20001 202.850.2754148 Alex Rixey Senior Transportation Planner measures to fill the gaps between goals and practice, regional,inter jurisdictional active transportation network including metrics for people driving,taking transit,biking, for the County.A comprehensive analysis of existing and walking,such as:multimodal person delay,bicyclist conditions and performance metrics,shared with the comfort-based accessibility,and vehicle miles traveled project team through an interactive enterprise GIS web (VMT)per person trip. Fehr&Peers DC prepared a case portal,will support network layout and an extensive study application of the metrics to the Bethesda stakeholder and public outreach efforts.Network concepts Downtown Plan to help illustrate the approach for the and cost estimates,scaled to the county level using station Planning Board and to test the capability of the County's typologies will support Metro's planning,funding,and current modeling and transportation analysis tools to project prioritization efforts. compute the metrics. Expo and Crenshaw Transit Neighborhood Plans Fehr&Peers DC has reviewed the County and MPO travel Fehr&Peers served the City of L.A.in their"Transit demand models as well as several alternatives to inform a Neighborhood Planning"for 10 future light rail stations strategic plan with near-,mid-,and long-term along the Crenshaw and Expo lines. The project included recommendations for the County's approach to new land use and streetscape regulations,general plan maintaining in-house travel demand modeling and amendments,and specific plans for five of the stations. transportation analysis resources.Alex is PM. Our approach to trip generation,parking demand estimation,and transportation evaluation for the SFV Family Support Center, Los Angeles,CA environmental impact report was informed by the Fehr&Peers conducted a detailed traffic impact study for innovative approaches to transportation evaluation that a new 250,330-square foot office building and associated Fehr&Peers helped the city develop as part of the"LA2B" parking structure on 4.6-acre site. The site is on the update to their circulation element. southwest comer of Saticoy Street&Van Nuys Boulevard in the community of Van Nuys in the City of Los Wilmington Redevelopment Project/Harbor Industrial Angeles. The proposed building will range between three Center Redevelopment and five stories and include office space for consolidating Fehr&Peers assisted the environmental team by •various County departments that exist in the surrounding analyzing the traffic and circulation impacts of the area. The project will also include a neighborhood park,a proposed amendments to the current redevelopment plan children's play area and a small amount of restaurant/retail for CRA/LA. The Los Angeles Harbor Industrial Center space to support the on-site uses. Fehr&Peers'analysis Redevelopment Plan Amendment would increase the included estimates of existing and future daily vehicles existing redevelopment area,allow CRA/LA to utilize miles of travel(VMT)to allow the changes to be quantified eminent domain authority on non-residential properties, for use in the environmental consultant's calculation of modify the land use provisions and map of the Harbor greenhouse gas emissions.Alex was a transportation City/Wilmington community plan area,and establish a new planner on the team. base year for the 30-year life of the proposed plan.The EIR provides a programmatic assessment of two future Los Angeles Union Station Master Plan development scenarios to describe the range of potential Alex led analysis of existing bus and rail arrival patterns at impacts that could result from the proposed the station and evaluated internal pedestrian circulation, redevelopment activities in the project area. Alex was a including pedestrian flows,capacity,and transfer times,to transportation planner on the team. inform both passenger concourse sizing and to determine capacity needs for vertical circulation.Alex also prepared detailed parking demand projections,as well as trip generation estimates(using our MXD+ mixed-use model) for the anticipated development at this exceptional Transit Oriented Development site. L.A.Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan Fehr&Peers is recommending a network of station access improvements,known as"the Path,"at 650 of the County's key rail and bus transit stops as well as establishing a 1003 K Street NW FEHR j PEERSDC5°`teZ°9 Washington,DC 20001 202 854 2750 149 x;r �j Air 5 • • Dana Weissman Senior Transportation Planner/Engineer "J l a About Professional Affiliations Dana Weissman is a Senior Transportation Planner with Institute of Transportation Engineers management experience on a wide range of multimodal Women's Transportation Seminar—Chair of Annual Event projects,including Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning,Safety, San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association and Research;Park Access and Circulation;Transit American Planning Association Planning;and Transportation Impact Assessment.Dana's Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals particular focus is on multimodal safety and project prioritization.Dana led the high-profile Vision Zero project Expertise prioritization effort for the City of Los Angeles,as well as two pedestrian prioritization efforts with the City of San • Multimodal Safety and Project Planning Francisco for their WalkFirst and Streetscape Prioritization • projects.Dana has presented on Vision Zero and other Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning • innovative safety strategies at conferences across the Park Access and Circulation • United States.Her WalkFirst and Streetscape Prioritization Transit Planning • projects won ITE and APA best project awards,and her Transportation Impact Assessment Vision Zero paper was honored with Pedestrian Committee Best Paper Award at TRB in 2015. Honors & Awards Dana joined Fehr&Peers in 2012 after graduating from • TRB Pedestrian Committee Best Paper Award, the University of Califomia, Berkeley,with a dual masters "Achieving Vision Zero:A Data-Driven Investment degree in transportation engineering and city planning. Strategy for Eliminating Pedestrian Fatalities on a Prior to graduate school, Dana worked as an economic Citywide Level,"2015 consultant in Boston.Dana's focus on active • ITE Pedestrian&Bicycle Standing Committee Best transportation,accessible transit,and multimodal Project Award,"San Francisco Streetscape transportation planning and engineering provides a solid Prioritization,"2015 multi-disciplinary foundation that she brings to all types of • APA Northern California Project of Merit,"SFMTA's transportation projects. WalkFirst Capital Projects Prioritization Outreach and Program,"2014 Education Publications & Presentations M.S.in Transportation Engineering,University of California, Berkeley,2012 • "Achieving Vision Zero:A Data-Driven Investment M.C.P.in City and Regional Planning, University of Strategy for Eliminating Pedestrian Fatalities on a California, Berkeley,2012 Citywide Level,"TRB,2015 B.A.in Economics,Middlebury College,2007 FEH R "' PEERS 332 Pine Street Floor 4 San Francisco I Denver I Los Angeles I Oakland I Orange County San Francisco,CA 94104 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San José I Seattle I Walnut Creek 415 348 0300 150 Dana Weissman „.,„_ ;di-uiiC 1C, L,c rid;-•f,r , 1C�i11CCl • "Vision Zero for Pedestrian Safety; New Thinking from answer the "where's and why's”associated with severe and San Francisco and New York," Pro Walk/Pro Bike/Pro fatal collisions.The Vision Zero Action Plan will also outline Place, Pittsburgh, PA,2014 a strategic planning framework to prioritize and • "Building Better Streets through Better Data:A Panel implement safety enhancements that most effectively on Innovative Approaches to Tackling Pedestrian improve safety for all users. Dana is taking a Safety,"APA California,Oakland,CA,2015 comprehensive look at existing transportation safety • "Vision Zero: Make this Vital Policy Your City's MO," challenges in the City of Sacramento and proposing a set APBP Professional Development Seminar,St. Louis, of actions that the City can take to address those needs. MO,2015 Work includes collision database development, safety data analysis, High Injury Network development,collision Project Experience profile development,and safety countermeasures identification. Multimodal Safety and Project Planning Pedestrian&Bicycle Planning Los Angeles Vision Zero Technical Analysis, Project Santa Clara Countywide Bicycle Master Plan, Project Manager Manager Los Angeles, CA San Francisco Streetscape Prioritization, Project Dana led a team that partnered with LADOT to apply a Manager data-driven approach to reach Vision Zero in the City of Bay Area Bike Share Expansion Los Angeles.She managed a technical analysis of the City's New Presidio Parklands Bicycle Planning, Project roadway collisions and the primary factors that contribute Manager to them.Collision profiles,which describe the most Contra Costa Transportation Authority Safe Routes to common and deadly collision patters,were developed School Projects and Programs using a statistical model that identified combinations of Google gBus Design Recommendations variables that together explain the presence of severe and fatal collisions.Dana's prioritization approach was applied Park Access&Circulation to the City's High Injury Network to identify priority project locations and guide implementation in the areas with the most need for safety improvements. Crissy Field Refresh, Project Manager Crissy Corridor Transportation Study, Project Manager San Francisco WalkFirst Pedestrian Safety CIP Pinnacles National Park Transportation Study, Project San Francisco, CA Manager Dana was the lead planner/engineer with the City and Vista Point Transportation Study, Project Manager County of San Francisco to create a prioritized pedestrian Palace of Fine Arts Transportation Study, Project capital improvement project list to meet benchmarks Manager outlined in the City's Pedestrian Strategy.The technical Dias Ridge Trail&Redwood Creek Trail Traffic and analysis used citywide pedestrian collision and injury data Parking Assessment, Project Manager to understand the current nature of pedestrian crashes, GGNRA Trail Access Improvements Study, Project profile different pedestrian crash types,determine the Manager most effective countermeasures,and prioritize a strategy San Mateo County Midcoast Multimodal Trail to treat the areas of greatest need for pedestrian Assessment, Project Manager infrastructure improvement. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Trails Grant Assessment, Project Manager Sacramento Vision Zero Action Plan Sacramento, CA Transit Planning Dana serves as technical advisor for the development of the Sacramento Vision Zero Action Plan.Through a data- Balboa Kiss-and-Ride Study, Project Manager driven and locally focused effort, she and her team are Millbrae Station Area Specific Plan, Project Manager creating a Plan that enables the City of Sacramento to Geneva-Harney BRT Feasibility Study F E H R ''' P E E R S 332 Pine Street Floor 4 San Francisco I Denver I Los Angeles I Oakland I Orange County San Francisco,CA 94104 Roseville I Salt Lake City I San Diego I San Jose I Seattle I Walnut Creek 41S 348.0300 Lnclana Linn Ilia e gridic,s tom Luciana Lin: dc Nlello is an architect 'anti urban plant .t with a Alusters degrees in both An Lindane and Engineering. Prior to i : Grid'Gridies, Luciana ked uiIL I II l'I L, I' II Ar hilerts in A %ow, she des eloped master plans. airports nun railA ("MUMS bull l . In _ op Luciana co f I l all architecture it .l lino Last I in Sas Paulo. Brazil, Iler svts rt.sponsilile for the sign idsneral production facilities for:url herr ua11111h tame ILuhrarr as ss ell as Inam Lrspokr rrsidrnres_ 1111013 Luciana was asked In join IPPL:AN. a non profit urban planning Institute. n Lyre she was responsible for dorelnping master. eomprr6tusise and transportation plans throughout Brzil. tut Lula is also a professor and has taught nrrWtecture related nnosus al sesoral uuisersitirs. i Cridit s, Luciana is contributing Ler experience to help dcyebp Zonal.- die future ul'smart urban dcvdopmend ‘‘ ()RK PAPERIENL1 Project Manager.l;ridies; \Hand. Fl. 2018-present Product dm eloper and pipeline manager of romprrhrnsisr urban planning and toning sufhtarr ILr eines. \rehiteet and I rhan Planner. IPI'LIN;Sao Jose dos Campos, SI'. 201'5-21115 \rrLilrrl and .Luumr al a non-prnlil org:mization drsrlopit , stralogie urhat plaudng werIanisms ILruuglt lit Jr.rlopment of tonhhg regulations. hid Accomplishments Cmnprelootsiye Zoning Code for the City of Sao Ileum do .Sapunal. Sao Paulo- Brazil_ Nlohility I'I:ui for ILr city of J'rememhe, Sao Paulo- Brazil. Don,11101%11 Ret italizal ion flan and Public Benefits duals sis liar the (lily of Sao.lose Its Campos.SI' -Brazil_ I Ilk ersity Professor, l Inisersidade Paulista; Sao Jost dos Campos. SP, 2010-2015 I uisersits Professor. linin ersidade\ale do Paraiba; Sao.lose dos 1:ampos,SI',2013-201 i \kiting Professor.SIE u:; Sao.lose dos Campos. SI',2011 1 uiserslty professor leaching in the fields of design thinking!architecture. planning and landscape:. I'artnrr Co.Founder, Clannini Arrluitetura h Design; Sao Josie dos l:ampos. SP, 21101 2015 Founding partner and managing btmlness director. ke Accomplishments Iinbraer 61:.38o Production Facility in Bottle:Ind SP- Brazil Embraer FC-18o Production Facility in Cas fan Prison, Sl'- Brazil taupe Libra Administratise Building in Ihr port of Santos, SI' - Brazil Vuditoriuuua d Adntinistralne budding in Brasilia, DI' Brazil \rrbitertural Designer. Pelli Clarke I'elli; \en I laver,Cf, 20111-2111111 VA Lily at ['elk Cla'kr I'rlli kredtitetL- Lucianos eXperienrr iuclndrd a range of both national and international architectural thud planting projects as null as design competitions. Lyes Areonhplisluueuh I as Islas de las Qowrias AA:urrfronl IAdmelopmenl Plan. Las Palmas- Canary Islands -Spain City [mind nl'Lis repent, !he Paradise Street Ucwloputent. l.iserpoul - I h Vdeport Terminal and Parkadr. Winnipeg Internaltonal kirporl, AAiuuipeg-AB -Canada Student Center. Grinnell College Grinnell, I I . S Vliuurapolrs I:mural Library, AIihuteapolis. ALA -I S 152 Cl/A1111. AFR SERA ICE \nluntrrr, Little Ilasana \!aster flan. \lianti. Fl„ 2017 VA miksh(p facilitator iu the creation oda plan for Little I latmta. Vleather or c()11 AAl. 2013 \[po'inted hw the dig of.San,lose (los Campos.. Ilra,il to be a member of the twirm11ueuud (0(111(11 Board Volunteer. I.reatiM1e.kers Workshop Conuunuily/;entre, I\ew Ila\en, CT.winter 200'1.2011i VIdaLuuhlnng Monitor. EDI C:A TMA Master's it' I:itR Engineering it. kir Transport Technological melt!utr of 5erona11lics, San,[Us dos Campos. SI'.Lauri \laster's in \relined in 1 ilk rrsih ,f Aatt Alrnioo-0laiu Campus- klbuqurrque. AN. goon Bachelor's \rts or:\rehilecture l llivrrsilc mf Arw Vesico-AIaii, C:uupus - ur, AAI. IOgB ARDS, PRESENT AilUAS VAI) Pt BLICA'1'111AS ll\ale, newspaper articles in the field o1'urban pluming. \member 30th. 2014 and \member 23th, 2013 h,ie/turni ilirr \ International Conrcnl ion on Emiro,mtent and l)e elopmenl. Publication.Cuba, 2013 / /bun Pbuuuus for the carromalinis all an( pu.r late(naaanrd.df,purl I]it ifrmtsporhtl ion Symposiums, Publication, Sao Paulo. 2013 Fuel roaevluplion non/!SCS ofp't and turboprop airpla,rllea ar VIII Air Transportation Symposium. Preseu tat inn and Publication, Sim Paulo, 2014 Planning and tawnoma hart taaaam nodal oppliallo urban arras nrarmrl nnpa/(s \ I Latin \mrriran School of Systemic Thlnkiug and Uesin t \mural Meeting. Presentation, Sao,lose dos Cao,pos. SP. 2013.4en,rn,p„li✓ The kmrAcan Institute of Architerls Award. Anteriean Institute of Arrhiteehs, 2001 For the rsrellenrr (if studding Architecture Frontier Award. 1999 Best 111Srgraduatr \rchitertmrc Student going to graduate Acrit ilcrturr School F\LS\I Selmlarship \ward, Halo.,, Moore. Shaffer N \lcCabe \relinerd', 1999 lust portfolio of arab IIeol11re nark 153 1943 Monroe st.Apt 209, Hollywood FL 33020 Ekaterina Yagodina e-mail : Ekaterina@zonar.city Cell :(917) 756 7006 Education and Achievements Relevant experience Master's Degree in Urban and Regional Planning Zoning and development analyst April2016-present Florida Atlantic University,Boca Raton, FL GRIDICS LLS January 2015-December 2016 - Product Management, Business analytics Master's Degree in Land Development - Zoning Codes analysis Omsk State Agriculture University, Omsk, Russia - Feasibility reports, Due Diligence September 2005-June 2010 Graduate Research Assistant January 2016-May 2016 Bachelor's Degree in Economy and Accounting Center of Environmental and Urban Studies,FAU Moscow State Institute of Technology and Light Industry - Case Study on budgeting and operating of the City Lauderdale Moscow, Russia,September 2006-May 2011 By The Sea Real Estate Associate License - Site Planning review, Due Diligence Report preparation Real Estate School of America,Sunny Isles, FL, May 2015 - Civic Engagement and Neighborhood Revitalization: issues and Project Management Study Course options for Little Havana, Miami, FL Project Management Institute, online,July 2016 Planning Intern October 2015-February 2016 Keith&Schnars, P.A. AutoCAD and Revit Certificate Fort Lauderdale, FL Cooper Union, New York, NY, December 2014 - Assisting in project reviews(comprehensive planning) Building Cost Estimating Certificate - Visioning matrix and statements'writing participation Cooper Union, New York, NY,April 2014 - Planning proposals assistantship for small cities in Orange NASM Fitness Nutrition Specialist Certificate county NASM CPT board, New York, NY,August 2014 Volunteer on APA'15,APA'16,CRA'16 conferences English Language/Literacy Program September 2015,September 2016 CUNY Kingsborough College, New York, NY American Planning Association, Hollywood/Tampa/Orlando, FL November 2013-January 2014 Landscape Design and Planning Intern CPR/AED certificate EDSA August 20Ci -September 2015 American Heart Association, New York, NY Fort Lauderdale,FL July 2011,August 2014 - Design guidelines for Artificial Island (China) Cadastral Engineer Association License - Transportation study and proposal for Artificial Island(China) Omsk, Russia, March 2011 - Review and submission of landscape projects for Miami-Dade county Skills: Real Estate Associate ':lay 2015-present Strong analytical thinking Strong math Century 21 1st class realty Planning/organizing Multitasking Sunny Isles, FL Research technics Computer literacy Project manager, land development specialist Decision making Cooperative 789 Land Development and Construction LLC Interpersonal abilities Flexibility/adaptability September 2010-June 2013 Software: Omsk,Russia Microsoft Office Photoshop, InDesign - Data analysis, land use regulation technics, project submission Microsoft Project Sketch Up and approval process On-Screen Take-Off ArcGIS,AutoCAD - Civil engineering, data processing, mapping,cadastral work, Jira,Confluence Land Development Intern Languages: Land development association May 2008-June 2009 English Russian(native) Omsk, Russia Personal Statement: Friendly, loyal and clearly - Land parcels boards and conditions regulation within Khakassia dedicated individual who has an ambition to succeed in preservation - any given environment. Have extensive experience in Data processing, mapping land development field internationally. 154 ..) •-- NC C ._ O c 0 U 4- O c1 U rn Q U o .- a) ca E Q � O N a) U vi .-, 4- C O Co _ CD U ° a� E .� o Q. Y E -o o cD CZ Q W I _ _c L > U a a) ca -0 o c m o +' L z U L L C O O O (J) .c75 -.(ii o -C ca u LD p c "�C ° 4— CD 0 '— - o 0 ° tii , C13 E E a) Lu2 5 Q _ > a� - 4- 0) 0 O ° Y-- �� • Cl) > CD _ ^C o• E ` ~= ° W (73 C �, L 0 C O Q) O O C ca C L cn O vUm C E E E D a _ L ^L` a ca c� — E N . • -0 v W U m U O •� 0) LL C > 6 O c a) a O cn - o O ° 0 co E .z � o E - 0 o _ caLO c_ C' -O Q C CD UE ' C �tt5O v E E m >, _Y 0 ca 2 H a) � °m 4? _ ) Q Q ., a. LL L co � ° a� °' o W �L i N > - -a O > Q N E Jo = W C Imo CI C > �-• Q, . a) s O _ Q o UC13 w a� cn cn m E O o 'C Q- (�CO p C 0 a ,� 0) al ••- a ci3 o CU c3 CZ ° < �, D °� a3 'E .� o 1 o o 0 0er ° U 111M4 ' ' C1) o E CN < L 0 0 0 o cn 2 2 2 LL Z CO •° co = c) Qc) a 0 2 CC5E Mark R. Sowers, PSM SUE Director/ Prroj//e��ct Surveyor Education/Training \ M.V. VERA Bachelors of Science, Land Surveying, University of Florida, 1988 &ASSOCIATES,Inc. Professional Registration Professional Surveyor& Mapper, Florida, PSM#5266 (1993) Years of Experience 30 Years (with MGV for 2 years) Office Location Jupiter, FL Professional Affiliations Florida Surveying & Mapping Society Availability for this Project: 50% Mr. Sowers is a Professional Surveyor & Mapper with 30 years of experience throughout the state of Florida. His responsibilities include managing field operations and establishing standards for consultants as well as final quality assurance / quality control of all deliverables before client submission. He is proficient in the latest industry technology, as well as developing and implementing successful management strategies. Mr. Sowers worked for the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District IV for eight years, four of them as District rt Surveyor. During his FDOT tenure, Mr. Sowers actively participated in statewide process improvements. He was a chairperson for FDOT's Survey Technical Advisory Committee and a member of the committees responsible for the development and implementation of the staff-hour estimating form and project network control sheet. Surveying Experience: Manuel G Vera & Associates, Inc. (2015-current) Cardno TBE (2001 to 2015) Florida Dept of Transportation District 4 (1993 to 2001) Kimely Horn &Associates, Inc. (1999 to 1993) Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, PD&E Study for Widening Sawqrass from South of US 441 to West of Powerline Road Sub Consultant to: The Corradino Group, Inc. Contact: Mike Ciscar, PE (305) 594-0735, mcisar(ccorradino.com Duration: 05/2016 thru Present Cost: $581,822.00 Role: SUE Director Project Description: MGV is responsible for preparing a complete Design survey, which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, the creation of Topographic Surveys and Digital Terrain Model, as well as provide subsurface utility engineering services (SUE). FDOT District VI, SR 826 Palmetto Expressway from East of NW 67th Avenue to East of NW 57`h Avenue (Segment 3) - (MP 18.117 to MP 19.08) Sub Consultant to: TRACE Consultants, Inc. Contact: Frank Panellas, PE (305) 338-1509, ifpanellas(a�traceci.com Duration: 11/2016 thru Present (3/28/19) Cost: $91,122.61 Role: Surveyor& Mapper Project Description: The primary purpose of this project is to relieve congestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity, enhance safety by addressing operational, structural and functional deficiencies and provide additional travel options. These improvements consist of the addition of express lanes, auxiliary lanes, reconstruction of the mainline and improvements to the existing interchanges. MGV is responsible for the following design survey tasks: 1.) Using the existing survey control, establish horizontal and vertical project network controls and re-set/add monuments that have been destroyed on project network control sheets; 2.) Extend the existing Topographic and DTM Survey; 3.) Planimetrics- locating 156 Mark R. Sowers, PSM SUE Director/ Project Surveyor approximately 600 trees along the main line of SR 826 / Palmetto Expressway; 4.) Check Cross Sections; 5.) A Drainage Survey to be performed along NW 57th Ave; and 6.) Geotechnical Support- approximately 250 test holes will be located with horizontal and vertical values. FDOT District IV, Turnpike Widening Atlantic to Boynton Beach Boulevard Sub Consultant to: GAI Consultants, Inc. Contact: John Saunders, PE (321) 319-3089, i.saunders(a�gaiconsultants.com Location: Palm Beach County, Florida Duration: 01/2016 thru Present (85% complete) Cost: $262,847.00 Project Length: 4.9 miles Role: Surveyor& Mapper Project Description: MGV was responsible for providing a Design Survey consisting of the following deliverables: the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, Survey Baseline and Right of Way Lines, Aerial Targets, creation of Topographic survey and Digital Terrain (DTM), Roadway Cross-Sections/Profiles, Bridge Survey, Channel Survey, and Pond Site Survey, and Project Network Control Sheets. City of Port St. Lucie, Cross Town Parkway Segment 1 from Manth Lane to US1 Sub Consultant to: RS&H, Inc. Contact: Rachel Back, PE, CFM (904) 256-2444, rachel.backrsandh.com Duration: 03/2015 thru 04/2016 Cost: $183,080 (Survey Services: $133,080.00 & SUE Services: $50,000.00) Project Length: 2.5 miles Role: SUE Director Project Description: MGV prepared a complete Design survey which includes the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical (NAVD 88) control networks, the creation of Topographic surveys and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D) in 3D laser scanning, perform cross sections, aerial targets, subdivision location (up to 100, as required), and geotechnical support. City of Doral, Topographic Survey NW 82nd Ave. from NW 27th St. to NW 33rd St. Sub Consultant to: Gannett Fleming, Inc. Contact: Alina Fernandez, PE (786) 845-9540, Ext. 5814, afernandezqfnet.com Duration: 06/2016 thru 04/2017 Cost: $24,859.75 Project Length: Task Work Order Based Role: SUE Director Project Description: MGV was responsible for providing a Design Survey consisting of the following deliverables: the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90) and vertical control (NAVD 88) networks, Survey Baseline and Subdivision Locations for Survey Baselines and Right of Way Lines, creation of Topographic survey and Digital Terrain Model (DTM/3D), Drainage Survey, Parcel Sketches and Legal Descriptions, and Title Search Report. MGV also performed subsurface utility services, including test holes locations. FDOT District IV, Districtwide Right of Way Mapping Production Support Consultant to: FDOT District IV Contact: Paul Doll, PE (954) 777-4579, paul.doll(dot.state.us Duration: 2014 thru On-Going Cost: $1.5 Million Project Length: Task Work Order Based Role: SUE Director Brief Description: On this districtwide task oriented contract, MGV is in charge for all survey activities including field survey activities and office support and mapping tasks for the duration of the contract. 157 ikt\ METRIC Gabriela Garcia, PE `di ENGINEERING Project Engineer TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE -ra,-sccra(.c- P'a--irg Mrs.Garcia currently serves as Project Engineer for transportation planning and traffic -raffr Ooeraiion5 operations projects. Her experience includes roadway, PD&E Studies and NEPA documentation, alternatives development, public involvement, cost estimating, and YEARS OF EXPERIENCE traffic operations. 'rears REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS EDUCATION SR 408 Eastern Extension PD&E Study, Central Florida Expressway Authority- B S C e. :cr:ca ITe^.z:,ona SEIR for a 7 mile eastern extension in Orange County.This project is the first phase of Uov=riry j2,1�; a larger regional vision to extend SR 408 to eventually connect to 1-95 and the Brevard PROFESSIONAL County coastal cities. Alternatives include new interchanges, bridging of the Econlockhatchee River, numerous, community and environmental concerns. Client: REGISTRATIONS Central Florida Expressway Authority, Contact: Glenn Pressimone, PE (407) 690- P,fessicnal2nc,ncer-FL 5321, Begin/End Dates: April 2015-Ongoing, Role: Project Engineer ft 77951 2014 US-271SR 2510keechobee Road from NW 79"Avenue to SR 997/Krome Avenue- OFFICE LOCATION The study(9.63 miles)aims to perform conceptual design and environmental study of '.favi P. roadway enhancements, frontage road enhancements, signalized intersection improvements, interchange modifications, and bridge widening to US 27/SR 25/Okeechobee Road from NW 79th Avenue to SR 997/Krome Avenue in Miami- Dade County, Florida. Okeechobee Road is pal of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS). Tasks include sub-consultant coordination, preparation of PER, public involvement, safety analysis and alternatives development and evaluation. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Bao-Ying Wang, PE (305) 470- 5211, Begin/End Dates:2012-2014, Role: Project Engineer CR 510 PD&E Study from CR 512 to 58t" Avenue for FOOT District 4, Indian River County, FL. Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Studies(CAT EX Type II) (5.3 miles)to improve the capacity along CR 510 from CR 512 to 58th Avenue by widening from two to four lanes and implementing a raised median. CR 512 currently serves as the main artery in northern Indian River County connecting 1-95 to US 1 and A1A. Tasks include preparation of Design Traffic Technical Memorandum(DTTM), lead the noise data collection, analysis and documentation efforts as well as support preparation of other environmental documents. Client: FDOT District 4, Contact: Maria Formoso, PE (954)777-4677, BeginlEnd Dates: February 2016 - Ongoing, Role: Project Engineer SR 874 (Don Shula Expressway) Ramp Connector PO&E Study for Miami-Dade Expressway Authority in Miami-Dade County-PD&E Study(2.5 miles)to evaluate a potential new ramp connection from SR 874(Don Shula Expressway)to SW 128th Street. This new ramp connection would provide an additional expressway access and mobility to the area. Tasks included preparation of purpose and need statement, alternatives analysis of potential corridors, alignments and typical sections, public involvement, and preparation of SEIR. Client: MDX, Contact: Mayra Diaz, (305) 637-3277, BeginlEnd Dates: January 2010 - June 2012, Role: Transportation Engineer NE 25th Avenue&NE 361^Avenue PD&E Studies,Marion County, FL-Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Studies (CAT EX Type II)to improve the capacity and reduce travel delays associated with the railroad crossings on both NE 25th Avenue and NE 36th Avenue from SR 492/NE 14th Street to NE 35" Street in Ocala, Florida (3 miles). The PD&E studies will evaluate intersection improvements, the potential widening of both corridors from two to four lanes and the feasibility of providing a bridge overpass over the CSX at the railroad crossings for both roadways. Client: FDOT District 5,Contact: Jazlyn Heywood(386)943- 5388, BeginlEnd Dates: June 2013-December 2015, Role: Deputy Project Manager/Project Engineer Oslo Road PD&E Study from E. of SR 9/1-95 to E. of 58th Avenue, Indian River County, FL - Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Studies (CAT EX Type II) (3.2 miles) to improve the capacity along Oslo Road from E of SR 911-95 to E of 58th Avenue by widening from two to four lanes and implementing a raised median, The Oslo Road widening will connect with the four lane section just east of 58th Avenue and to the proposed interchange at 1-95 and Oslo Road. The project is outside of the urban service boundary and R/W acquisition will likely be required. Client: FDOT District 4, Contact: Sabrina Aubery, PE (954) 777-4585,Begin/End Dates: 2014-2016, Role: Deputy Project Manager/Project Engineer U.S. 90 (SR 10) Corridor Project Development and Environment Study, Santa Rosa County, FL: This Environmental Assessment is primarily to evaluate the potential for increasing the capacity for the east-west travel demands on U.S. 90 in Milton, Florida. The capacity improvements evaluated will consist of, but are not limited to, widening the existing facility, a new corridor, additional bridging of the Blackwater River, and/or combinations thereof. The Study extends from the intersection of Glover Lane/U.S. 90 to the intersection of SR87S/U.S.90,a distance of approximately 14 miles.Client: FDOT District 3,Contact: Peggy Kelley(850-415-9517), Begin/End Dates: November 2013-Ongoing, Role: Transportation Engineer SR 87 Connector PD&E Study(Santa Rosa County)-This EIS is being conducted for a new and more direct corridor in Santa Rosa County. The study area (6.5 miles) contains critical habitat for endangered species, floodplains, and Florida Trust Lancl.%8 Gabriela Garcia, PE Project Engineer among other environmentally sensitive areas. The project will provide a new bridge crossing the Blackwater River,one of Florida's Outstanding Waterways, and its entire floodplain. The selected corridor is able minimize environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. Tasks include alternatives evaluation, preparation of PER, and DEIS/FEIS. Client: FDOT District 3, Contact: Peggy Kelley, PE(850)330-1517, Begin/End Dates:June 2009—November 2014, Role: Transportation Engineer SR 292 PD&E Study (Escambia County) — This Type II CE study (.35 miles) involved adding lanes, improving turning movements, adding bike lanes and pedestrian facilities to the intersection of SR 292/SR 295. The study also included developing streetscape enhancements, on-street parking, and hardscaping. The re-configuration of the intersection geometry will require additional right-of-way. Tasks included the evaluation of alternatives, preparation of the PER and DTTM. Client: FDOT District 3, Contact:Peggy Kelley,PE(850) 330-1517, Begin/End Dates:July 2011 —January 2013, Role: Transportation Engineer SR A1A Deerfield Beach PD&E Study for FDOT District 4—PD&E Study from south of SE 3b Street to north of NE 71)Street in Broward County (a distance of approximately .841 miles). The study considered additional through lanes, special treatment and/or additional lanes at major intersections and widening of the crossroads where necessary to provide intersection operation at an acceptable Level of Services. Tasks included public involvement, preparation of PDSR, utility coordination, coordination with City of Deerfield Beach and review of environmental documentation. Client: FDOT District 4, Contact: Patrick Glass, PE (954) 777-4681, Begin/End Dates: February 2009—September 2011, Role: Transportation Engineer SR 710 PD&E Study for FDOT District 4 — PD&E Study for a 15-mile stretch of SR 710 (a FIHS/SIS facility)in Martin County from the Okeechobee/Martin County Line to CR 609. The study considered additional through lanes, provision of a median, widening of the crossroads where necessary to provide intersection operation at an acceptable Level of Service, pedestrian enhancements including construction of multi-use trail and grade separation of highway and multi-use trail over the CSX railway. Tasks included public involvement, alternative 8 typical section analysis, access management evaluation including preparation of proposed access management plan, and preparation of PDSR.Client: FDOT District 4, Contact: Patrick Glass, PE (954)777-4681, Begin/End Dates: October 2007—July 2011, Role: Transportation Engineer Districtwide PD&E Consultant — PD&E Study to perform miscellaneous engineering and environmental studies on specific portions of transportation improvement projects and others associated tasks such as implementation of the ETDM and Socio- cultural effects, etc. Tasks include coordination of the multiple TWOS, field reviews, documentation, scope of services development, public involvement. Client: FOOT District 6, Contact: Bao Xing Wang, PE (305)470-5211, Begin/End Dates: April 2009—July 2014, Role: Transportation Engineer SR 836 PD&E Study from NW 170 Avenue Interchange to Midtown Interchange in Miami-Dade County for FDOT District 6 — The project involved the potential realignment, capacity and geometric improvements to SR 836, an elevated expressway that traverses approximately 1.4 miles within the City of Miami. More specific improvements potentially involve the provision of a minimum of six continuous mainline lanes and the provision of parallel collector distributor facilities.Tasks included preparation of PER, quantities and cost estimate, public involvement, evaluation of alternatives and existing conditions, pavement design, etc. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Vilma Croft, PE (305) 470-5240, BeginlEnd Dates: January 2007 — August 2011, Role: Transportation Engineer Districtwide Traffic Operations Studies Consultant Services — The general purpose of this contract is to provide traffic engineering services through the development of various traffic operations studies that will be identified for intersections, arterials, etc., and related improvement recommendations and evaluations. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Esteban Espinal, El (305) 470-5303, Begin/End Dates:January 2010—January 2015, Role: Transportation Engineer Tasks completed include: • Coral Way between SW 37th Avenue and SW 131°Avenue Speed Zone Study • SR A1A(Collins Avenue)@ 17th Street Qualitative Assessment • SR 860-Miami Gardens Drive @ Miami Carol City Senior High School Pedestrian Crossing Study • SR 5(US-1)@ SW 62nd Avenue Left-Turn Phase Warrant Analysis • NW 139^Street @ NW 17th Avenue QA Qualitative Assessment Districtwide Traffic Operations and Safety Studies Contract, FDOT District 6 — Task work order driven contract which includes the investigation of fatal crashes and high crash locations district-wide. Sub to ATEC. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Ms.!vette Funtanellas. El (305)470-5311, Role: Transportation Engineer Tasks completed include: • Biscayne Boulevard from NE 6144 Street to NE 77th Street—Evaluation for Raised Median • SR 856/William Lehman Causeway from SR A1A/Collins Avenue to W Country Club Drive Request for Pedestrian Crosswalk • SR A1A/Collins Avenue at NE 181st Street Pedestrian Signal Warrant Analysis • SR A1A/Collins Avenue from 5th Street to Espanola Way Truck Evaluation 159 ink METRIC Caitlin Hill `0 ENGINEERING Marine Biologist TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE ','oris a-d 6i JI':fe Biology Caitlin Hill is an MUS authorized scientific diver who has been conducting marine Cora o<es:ora:.or habitat and species assessments as well as restoration practices in South Florida for the last seven years. Ms. Hill specializes in marine science surveying including Seagrass >r.».: ors benthic marine resource surveys and health assessments, coral LEP assessr-eels gardening/fragmentation and restoration practices, and fish identification surveys. Ms. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Hill is also experienced in providing a wide array of environmental support services in South Florida for technical reports, wildlife surveys and reporting, NEPA :ear, documentation, habitat surveys,and permitting efforts. EDUCATION REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS S r P:I3nne So,erce a^e Metric Engineering Mav 2014-Present: = Toy7 _n+,ersi^7 of `,Bari 12L1 . Districtwide Mitigation Site Development, Maintenance and Monitoring, Miami- PROFESSIONAL Dade and Monroe Counties, FL: REGISTRATIONS Ms. Hill provides weekly in-house support at District 6 for a variety of filing, archiving, :DE GC fad Storrwaleand general contract-specific maintenance tasks. Ms. Hill also provides support by 3-es r a-c Se:ime"ra cr.Cc t Dl conducting field assessments including wildlife, coral, benthic resource, and wetland -srecor vegetation surveys, preparing monitoring results, coordinating with regulatory -Hp FP,Gr Cer-i'zc -o^eal::re agencies regarding site compliance with permit criteria and remedial plan r-o=ess ora; development, and GPS data interpretation for GIS figure production. Client: FDOT District 6, Reference: Susanne Travis (305) 470-5139, Project Duration: May 2013 .._ i.:__ ,ad i.aced Oce-. to present, Primary Role: Environmental Technician. Selected Projects for reference: 1efe� -Boca Chica Seagrass Restoration Site-Naval Air Station,Key West.Seagrass thio( :Meg Ger ::cat or recruitment enhancement project development and installation as well as seagrass cc?„A..t-orzed Ss:ar6G: D,,e- surveys to assess health,species presence,and overall coverage.q RA a-d Coral Gartlan-, - Houseboat Row Seagrass Restoration Site - Houseboat Row, Key West. Fagranatiicn Tranrg Seagrass surveys conducted to assess health, species presence, and overall coverage. OFFICE LOCATION - Bahia Honda Coral Relocation and Monitoring - Bahia Honda Bridge, Bahia Pdiari. FL Honda. Corals attached to pilings scheduled for reconstruction were relocated to the Old Spanish Harbor bridge and were monitored for health. Grove Isle Bridge Rehabilitation Permitting, Metric Engineering (Grove Isle), Miami-Dade County, FL: Conducted a wetland delineation, seagrass survey, benthic habitat survey and delineated extents of mangroves for a privately-owned bridge rehabilitation project in Miami-Dade County. Tasks include coordinating with federal, state and local agencies, obtaining permit exemptions from the USAGE and SFWMD, and preparing a DERM Class I permit application. Client: Community of Grove Isle Reference: Eduardo Avila (305) 857-0400, Project Duration: November 2014 to Present, Primary Role: Environmental Technician Benthic Ecology Laboratory Assistant, University of Miami-RSMAS,Mav 2009-July 2012: Ms. Hill created and monitored artificial coral reefs at select locations in Biscayne National Park. Field surveys were conducted to assess health of coral, identify coral and fish species presence, and collect field data for computer analysis, using such programs as ArcGIS and Coral Point Count with Excel. Ms. Hill also conducted seagrass assessment surveys and collected samples which were later used to determine nutrient composition for pollution monitoring. Counterpart International -partnership- Ms. Hill constructed and populated artificial reefs with Acropora spp. on behalf of Counterpart International within the Punta Cana Ecological Preserve in the Dominican Republica and at Utila,' Honduras. Ms. Hill also developed coral fragmentation & maintenance programs to be used as a public resource in lower-income communities in the Caribbean as part of the Counterpart International initiative to improve the livelihoods of fishing families. Shallow Water Positioning System (SWaPS) NOAA- partnership-Ms. Hill conducted surveys throughout Biscayne National Park as part of this effort to document health, status, and species composition of seagrass beds. Surveys were conducted over several weeks throughout the year tor consecutive years to quantify patterns of damage and recovery on shallow coastal habitats. Publications: Propagation of the threatened staghord coral Acropora cervicornis: methods to minimize the imapcts of fragment collection and maximize production. Coral Reefs (2010) 29:729-735 Acknowledgements: In Situ Coral Nurseries Serve as Genetic Repositories for Coral Reef Restoration after an Extreme Cold-Water Event, Restoration Ecology (2012) 20,6: 696-703. Growth Dynamics of the Threatened Caribbean Staghom Coral Acropora cervicornis: Influence of Host Genotype, Symbiont Identity. Colony Size, and Environmental Setting. PLoS ONE 9(9):e107253. 160 w\ METRIC Sijong Jo, PhD \7i ENGINEERING Senior Traffic Engineer TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE Demarc anc—raihc Dr. Jo has an extensive background in all phases of traffic engineering and dna ysis Cute. -PFNPLF;•I. transportation modeling. He is especially proficient in computer modeling, traffic —ransC?.D Err-a2 operation analysis, traffic and revenue forecasts and authored several publications. rraf r I3l.,ni;,nahTsls Or. Jo has also spearheaded the completion of numerous traffic engineering .. s .I .1.;..��.i ST^.,,HRC assignments in the United States and in several foreign countries. 4Cs.Tom.T art!c S:RP REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS TE-2-7131--72 PASSER r CR 510 PD&E Study from CR 512 to 58" Avenue, Indian River County, FL. P..SSER I Project Development and Environment (PD&E)Studies(CAT EX Type II)(5.3 miles) general °CRTRA'I v sual Eesic to improve the capacity along CR 510 from CR 512 to 58th Avenue by widening from 53 _ 3.3 SPSS P.'S-;,ccesstwo to four lanes and implementing a raised median. CR 512 currently serves as the `.IS-i;r- CS-Ecce. ns main artery in northern Indian River County connecting 1-95 to US 1 and A1A. Tasks Pc:ve•'c n! include preparation of Design Traffic Technical Memorandum (DTTM), lead the noise data collection, analysis and documentation efforts as well as support preparation of YEARS OF EXPERIENCE other environmental documents. Client: FDOT District 4, Contact: Maria Formoso, 22'1-4-4-4 PE (954) 777-4677, Begin/End Dates: December 2015 —Ongoing, Role: Traffic EDUCATION Engineer _ SR-29 from 1.75 to Oil Well Road PD&E Study,Collier County. The study involves D . ., _ i ar-g .rico the evaluation of widening SR-29 from a two-lane undivided principal arterial to a • r . rz. un r /. 20r '!SGS four-lane divided highway. The study limits span approximately 10 miles, from I-75 to CR-858, Oil Well Road, in Collier County. South of Immokalee, SR-29 runs adjacent Tel ex=ept to the former route of the Seaboard Coast Line Rail Road route, SR-29 within the 3sser�so J'ir _>:v o-F o-caproject limits lies at the heart of critical ecosystems as it divides Big Cypress National 11;89-1993 Preserve and Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge. Establishing a credible project 4d S Cwil Encree'-g Seoul need and securing the buy-in from the conservation community are the keystones of PJar.onal Lnlers::Y. L8.>193T this project. The I-75/SR-29 interchange will also be evaluated for traffic and safety. 3.5 Cidii Encree•--g. Seed The study also includes 8 bridge structures, including 4 wildlife (panther) crossings. flatbnal LIV,eGily. 1E31-19d5 Client: FDOT District 1, Contact: Patrick Bateman, El (863) 519-2792, Begin/End OFFICE LOCATION Dates: July 2016—Ongoing. Role: Traffic Engineer fJ',a n FL US-1/South Dixie Highway (Busway) Study, Miami Dade Expressway Authority (MDX): Analysis and Reports, Crash Data, Design Traffic, Travel Time Validation, Street Traffic Impact Analysis Parameters, Design Traffic Technical Memorandum, Meetings, Access Management, Quality Assurance, Public Involvement, and Public Meetings. Dr. Jo performed an evaluation of existing travel and geometric conditions, crash history, and travel time along the project corridor utilizing Synchro and Vissim to evaluate existing signal timing and to develop optimized timings. Dr. Jo was instrumental in creating the VISSIM model for the network containing over 100 intersections. Client: Sub to Gannett Fleming, Contact: Carlos Cejas, PE; Gannett Fleming, 786- 845-9540. Ext 5812, Begin/End Dates: 2011-2014,Role: Sr. Transportation Engineer South Florida Regional Transportation Authority(SFRTA),Td-Rail Transit Development Plan-On Board Ridership Survey, Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, FL: This project consisted of an on-board travel survey of SFRTA Tri-Rail riders for the purpose of capturing travel patterns, socio-economic characteristics, and customer opinions and preferences. The primary goal of this survey effort was to gather information related to current ridership patterns and identify areas for improvements to support SFRTA's FY 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan(TDP). Major Update. Sijong conducted on-board surveys as well as boardings and alightings. Client: SFRTA, Contact: Nathalie Yesbeck, SFRTA, 954-788-7957, Begin/End Dates: 2013, Role: Sr. Transportation Engineer Douglas Road Transit Corridor Study, Miami-Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL: This project consisted of evaluating travel characteristics for a potential new route along the Douglas Road Corridor from the Miami Intermodal Center(MIC)to Coral Gables/Coconut Grove area. Evaluated travel time and speed, identified operational deficiencies, prepared technical memorandum. Client: Sub to Gannett Fleming, Contact: Carlos Cejas, Gannett Fleming. 786-845-9540 Ext. 5812. Begin/End Dates: 2013, Role: Sr.Transportation Engineer Kendall Drive Transit Signal Priority Pilot Study, Miami Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL (2012- 2013):As part of a traffic study to evaluate the impact of bus priority for a pilot program initiated by Miami Dade County MPO; Dr. Jo analyzed the Kendall Drive corridor from SW 137 to SW 127 Avenue using VISSIM. Client: Miami-Dade MPO, Contact: 161 Sijong Jo, PhD Senior Traffic Engineer Jitender Ramchandani,AICP, Miami Dade County MPO, 305-375-1735, Begin/End Dates: 2012-2013, Role: Sr.Transpodation Engineer 1-395 PD&E Study in Miami-Dade County for FDOT District 6: The PD&E Study entailed the preparation of EIS for a proposal to improve 1-395 in Miami-Dade, Florida. The proposed improvement would involve the reconstruction of 1-395 from 1-95/Midtown Interchange to Biscayne Bay, a distance of 1.2 miles. Improvements to the corridor are considered necessary to provide for the existing and projected traffic demand. Alternatives consideration included elevated reconstruction with ramps at Midtown Interchange; elevated reconstruction with ramps at Miami Avenue, a tunnel design and an open-cut design (depressed expressway). Due to community opposition, MEI held over 150 meetings with the public and stake holders which led to public approval and LDCA. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Vilma Croft, PE (305) 470-5240, BeginlEnd Dates: June 2006- July 2010, Role: Senior Traffic Engineer&Transportation Planner SR 836 (Dolphin Expressway) PD&E Study from NW 17th Avenue Interchange to Midtown Interchange in Miami-Dade County for FDOT District 6 (515 & FIHS Facility) The project involved the potential realignment, capacity and geometric improvements to SR 836, an elevated expressway that traverses approximately 1.4 miles within the City of Miami. More specific improvements potentially involved the provision of a minimum of six continuous mainline lanes and the provision of parallel collector distributor facilities. The project was developed following the ETDM methodology. The project was screened via the EST by the ETAT members, constant communication with them throughout the duration of the study to ensure a buildable and permitable project at the completion of the study. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Vilma Croft, PE (305) 470-5240, Begin/End Dates:January 2007-August 2011, Role: Senior Traffic Engineer&Transportation Planner NW 14th Street Access Improvements to 1-395 PD&E Study in Miami-Dade County for FDOT District 6: PD&E Study(1 mile) for the addition of on/off ramps to 1-95 and 1-395. Study requires a comprehensive PD&E analysis and IJR. The project includes preliminary and final engineering reports and master plans, traffic modeling and technical memorandum and extensive public involvement with the Overtown area. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact:Vilma Croft, PE(305)470-5240,BeginlEnd Dates: April 2001 -September 2005, Role: Senior Traffic Engineer&Transportation Planner Districtwide PD&E Services-SW 10th Street Connector Feasibility Study,FDOT District 4-The study focused on providing an efficient movement between the Turnpike, Sawgrass Expressway and 1-95, while retaining and integrating the local access and traffic movements. Our traffic engineering effort required us to perform the requisite data collection(traffic counts, determination of major traffic generators,signalized and unsignalized intersections)effort.Services included operational analysis and preparation of a Design Traffic Technical Memorandum. (Sub to C3TS) PM Robert Carballo, PE, (305) 445-2900, Role: Senior Traffic Engineer&Transportation Planner Bridgeport Avenue and SW 30 Ct.Traffic Study in Miami-Dade County for City of Miami -Traffic Study to resolve traffic cut through, speeding and other concerns reported at Bridgeport Ave and SW 30 CT between US1 and Bird Ave within the City of Miami. The study will include such issues as traffic circulation, geometry,crash analysis(years 2005 to 2007),trip generation and attraction, etc. In addition, a pre-meeting with FDOT to properly coordinate the objectives and procedures of the study will be conducted as the initial study task.The study area is bounded by NW 27th Ave.on the east, Bird Ave. on the south and US-1 along the north and west. Client: City of Miami, Contact:Tatiana Acosta (305) 416-1263, Begin/End Dates: February 2009-April 2010, Role: Senior Traffic Engineer&Transportation Planner Graduate Research Assistant, Transportation Research Center, University of Florida, January 1990-December 1993. Involved in the development of several computer programs, including ESOAP,WHICH,and LOS2Graph. Research Fellow, Korea Transport Institute,August 1988-July 1989. Involved in a project on traffic safety improvement planning for the Korean National Highways and Mokdong New town transportation planning and traffic analysis. Publications 1. Jo, Sijong, and Ken Courage, "A Graphical Representation of Signal and Stop Sign Control Warrants Combined with Level of Service Estimates," Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Microcomputers in Transportation, Baltimore, July 1992. 2. Jo, Sijong, Albert Gan, and Gina Bonyani, "Impacts of Truck-lane Restrictions on Freeway Traffic Operations,' Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board,Washington, D.C.,2003. 3. Gan, Albert and Sijong Jo, "Operational Performance Models for Freeway Truck-Lane Restrictions," Final Report submitted to the Florida Department of Transportation,April 2003. 4. Jo, Sijong, "Development of Operational Performance Models for Truck Lane Restrictions on Freeway Corridors", Ph.D. Dissertation, Miami, Florida, 2003. 162 ge.lik METRIC Daniel Parobok gig ENGINEERING Arborist/Landscape Inspector TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE H 1 c,teen arc Atorieulture Mr, Parobok specializes in urban and municipal arboriculture and landscape technical YEARS OF EXPERIENCE oversight including installation, establishment, and site design review. Mr. Parobok also has experience in environmental compliance and scientific surveys including 4 Year species surveys, invasive species identrfication and removal, wetland delineations, EDUCATION permit and code compliance, and environmental permitting for various jurisdictions 9 S. in La:ur3l Resources p.oCh including state, county, and municipal levels. Oar na 3,ats 2012, REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL Landscape Consultant, City of Dania Beach, Landscape Consultant — Work REGISTRATIONS consists of reviewing landscape plans for new proposed developments and infrastructure for compliance with the City code, reviewing and authorizing tree 15A Ceffiriiec ltar st F; -68C1 removal licenses, providing technical support to the Code Compliance Unit for tee';f ed Her:Li e D-ciess o-a. violations of the City's Tree Protection ordinance, conducting field landscape E IGLA.;HC°851= inspections of newly installed vegetation, identifying hazardous trees and coordinating Czr:pc L3-s-ac: Inscecnr tree maintenance activities with Public Services. Client: City of Dania Beach; 2515-1c4 Contact: Corinne Lajoie, Principal Planner (954) 924-6800; Begin/End Dates: May 2014 to present etertre`d rr atet r r Ciarcege�9 3 Statewide Arborist Services for Vegetation Management Permitting, FDOT nscso-sCentral Office,Arborist—This contract provides support to the FDOT Central Office flee-radLezel 1 Niiltlland for the statewide vegetation management permitting program, pertaining to outdoor Firefighter advertising locations along state roads state-wide. Work includes conducting field OFFICE LOCATION landscape evaluations within FDOT right of way to determine the size,species,quality and appraised value of landscape vegetation. Work also includes evaluation of ',liani F_ - proposed applications, including plan review,for vegetation maintenance and removal practices,for compliance with State Statute and permit requirements. Client: FDOT Central Office, Right of Way, Contact: Morris Pigott(850)414-4574,Begin/End Dates: May 2014 to present Districtwide Environmental Permit Compliance, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FL, Environmental Inspector— This contract provides for inspection and monitoring of all active construction sites within FDOT District 6, to verify, document and facilitate environmental compliance. Work includes preparation of environmental compliance documentation for preconstruction meetings, conducting routine inspections of active construction sites, coordinating with project CEI staff to achieve environmental compliance and coordination with FDOT and regulatory staff. Environmental issues include compliance with NPDES criteria, wetland (ERP and Sec 404 Dredge and Fill permits), SFWMD Right of Way permits, dewatering permits, Miami-Dade permits for off-system roads and documentation of compliance with PD&E/NEPA commitments including monitoring and preservation of historic/archaeological sites, Sec4(f) issues, and wildlife protection/conservation provisions. Client: FOOT District 6, Contact: Manuel Vega(305)470-5281, Begin/End Dates: November 2011 to present Technical Landscape Review and Inspection Services on Florida's Turnpike System, Miami Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Martin, and St. Lucie Counties, FL, CEI Landscape Inspector— Responsible for conducting field inspections and contractor oversight for bold landscaping installation phases including MOT, daily and final acceptance of work, and approval of contractor invoices. Responsibilities also include monthly inspections for two-year landscape establishment period, including contractor oversight for landscape maintenance and replacement activities. Scope includes close coordination with Turnpike operations staff, join inspections with Turnpike staff for acceptance and for potential conflicts with operations and maintenance needs. Inspection sites managed to-date: Okeechobee Boulevard Interchange$1M install; Indiantown Road Interchange$749K install; Ft. Pierce Interchange$1.3M install: Becker Rd Interchange$1.3M install. Client: Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Contact: Andrew Seibel (954) 934-1233, Begin/End Dates:October 2014 to present FDOT Districtwide Environmental Permit Compliance, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FL, Environmental Inspector— This contract provided for inspection and monitoring of all active construction sites within FDOT District 6,to verify, document and facilitate compliance with environmental permits, plan notes and details, and FDOT specifications. Work included preparation of environmental compliance documentation for preconstruction meetings, conducting routine inspections of active construction sites, coordinating with project CEI staff to achieve environmental compliance and coordination with FDOT and regulatory staff. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Manuel Vega(305)470-5281, Begin/End Dates:April 2014 to April 2015 163 [v\ METRIC Stefan Escanes, PE WO ENGINEERING Project Engineer TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE —rarrrtaicn Planning Mr Escanes currently serves as Project Engineer.for transportation planning and traffic operations projects. Responsibilities include performing traffic analyses; writing arc Cc'raf"'-'s technical reports, communicating findings with design and planning staff and giving —ra`fc Analysis presentations of findings to clients. .caz Analysis REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS YEARS OF EXPERIENCE Miami Beach Active Traffic Management. As part of this effort,traffic along various 3 Years key corridors within the City of Miami Beach are being actively monitored for EDUCATION abnormal travel conditions during incidents such as crashes, lane closures, abrupt volume increase, etc. Traffic Operators utilize the CCTV cameras and Bluetooth/WiFi 3 3 0 E. =c _a l Vte.rnat anal vehicle detection devices to provide travel time reports to City staff and signal Jn I sEE/ 2015. engineer in order to evaluate and implement signal timing modifications as PROFESSIONAL appropriate. There are four main objectives for the Active Traffic Management REGISTRATIONS program (1) Minimize traffic impacts. (2) Manage and provide orderly flow of traffic. (3) Minimize the use of police resources for traffic control activities. (4) Relay critical P-arsssizna E-gree--FL real-time travel information via social media (Twitter) and/or Variable Message Signs =8J578 2013 (VMS signs). In addition, signal timing patterns were developed for various key =DOT—raiP.r, Noise A-aiyss corridors to accommodate the traffic flow during special events. The signal timing 3au se 3T-19-CUC5 recommendations were developed using traffic counts, Synchro models and -1Yia PiP,I 25 engineering judgment. Client: City of Miami Beach, Contact: Mr. Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, (305)673-700, Begin/End Dates: June 2014—Ongoing, Role: Project Manager OFFICE LOCATION Districtwide Traffic Operations & Safety Studies Consultant Services — The general purpose of this contract is to provide traffic engineering services through the development of various traffic operations and safety studies that will be identified for intersections, arterials, etc., and related improvement recommendations and evaluations. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Ramon Sierra(305)470-5336, Begin/End Dates:June 2013—On-going, Role: Traffic Engineer • SR A1AIMacArthur Causeway/5Th Street—Arterial Analysis/Signal Retiming • SR AlA/Indian Creek Drive/Abbott Avenue/Harding Avenue—Arterial Analysis/Signal Retiming • SR A1AICollins Avenue at 63"Street Northbound Loop Detector Installation Evaluation • SR MA/Indian Creek Drive at 65h Street—Pedestrian Evaluation Districtwide Traffic Operations Support Services Contract. This task work order basis contract has been utilized to develop travel time thresholds and monitor travel times for Palmetto Expressway Express Lanes project. A"mobility incentive" is provided for Construction Team to encourage achievement of highest travel time performance during the construction. A penalty is assessed against the "mobility incentive' when the travel time along the corridor exceeds the travel time thresholds. Travel time data is tracked in real time during the construction by Bluetooth/WIFI vehicle detection devices. These devices utilize wireless network equipment to transfer data from the devices to a central server where the data is processed. Travel time reports are provided to the Construction Team on a two-day interval. A monthly summary of penalties against the"mobility incentive" is also prepared and distributed. Grid power from the sign luminaires is utilized for providing power to all the travel time data collection stations. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Jacques Defrant, PE (305) 470-5385, Begin/End Dates: June 2014 — Ongoing, Role: Traffic Engineer DW Transportation Systems Management&Operations (TSM&O) Studies &Design Contract(sub to TEDS), TWO#4: 1-4 Ramp Metering. Metric provided Ramp Metering Study Services for 1-4 at the following Downtown Orlando interchanges: Princeton Street, Ivanhoe Boulevard, SR 50 (Colonial Drive), Amelia Street, South Street, Anderson Avenue, Orange Blossom Trail and John Young Parkway. The work included data collection, design traffic projections, ramp signal modeling, concept development and evaluation, as well as stakeholder coordination and System Engineering documentation development or update (ConOps, SEMP, RITSA) to include ramp metering. Contact: FDOT District 5 Jim Miller / Yvonne Brown, StartlEnd Dates: 6/2016.1/2017. Role: Traffic Engineer Central Lakeland Transit Signal Priority Study The purpose of this contract is to provide the District One Traffic Operations Office with professional services for conducting a Transit Signal Prioritization Feasibility Study. This study will be conducted to determine the need and effectiveness of a Transit Signal Priority (TSP) system and bus queue jump lanes and the ability to implement either or both on three or four state highway corridors in the City of Lakeland. If determined to be feasible, the study would identify specific projects that would be proposed for the future funding in the Florida Department of Transportation's Five 164 Stefan Escanes, PE Project Engineer Year Work Program. Client: FDOT District 1, Contact: William Cashdollar, PE, (863) 519-2300, BeginlEnd Dates: March 2014 -May 2015, Role: Traffic Engineer CR 510 PD&E Study from CR 512 to 58th Avenue, Indian River County, FL. Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Studies (CAT EX Type II) (5.3 miles)to improve the capacity along CR 510 from CR 512 to 58th Avenue by widening from two to four lanes and implementing a raised median. CR 512 currently serves as the main artery in northern Indian River County connecting 1-95 to US 1 and AlA. Tasks include preparation of Design Traffic Technical Memorandum (DTTM) and roundabout feasibility analysis, lead the noise data collection, analysis and documentation efforts as well as support preparation of other environmental documents. Client: FDOT District 4, Contact: Maria Formoso, PE(954)777-4677, Begin/End Dates: December 2015-Ongoing, Role: Traffic Engineer/Lead Noise Analyst Tri-Rail Coastal Link Service PD&E Study, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties. This effort includes preparation of the environmental studies necessary to comply with FTA requirements and lead to the preparation of an Environmental Assessment for a proposed integrated regional rail transit system on the Florida East Coast Railway Corridor. The transit corridor being evaluated is along the existing FEC Railway that generally parallels Dixie Highway and U.S. 1. The 85-mile study area extends from Jupiter through Pompano Beach to downtown Miami. Mr. Escanes tasks include the existing and future operational analysis for the rail-highway grade crossings and adjacent signalized intersections, in addition to the 25 station area locations along the alignment (65 additional intersections). The operational analysis is being conducted using Synchro 8 for intersection capacity and using Vissim for its pre-emption and complex intersection capabilities in order to better gauge the effect of increased rail activity. Client: The Corradino Group, Contact: Howard H. Newman, PE(407)203-0653, Begin/End Dates: February 2014 -Ongoing., Role: Traffic Engineer Oslo Road PD&E Study from E. of SR 9/1-95 to E. of 581h Avenue, Indian River County, FL - Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Studies (CAT EX Type II) (3.2 miles)to improve the capacity along Oslo Road from E of SR 9/1-95 to E of 58th Avenue by widening from two to four lanes and implementing a raised median. The Oslo Road widening will connect with the four lane section just east of 58th Avenue and to the proposed interchange at 1-95 and Oslo Road. The project is outside of the urban service boundary and RAN acquisition will likely be required. Tasks include preparation of Design Traffic Technical Memorandum (DTTM) and roundabout feasibility analysis, support and review of noise analysis, and preparation of other environmental documents.Client: FDOT District 4,Contact: Sabrina Aubery. PE(954)777-4585. Begin/End Dates: July 2014- Ongoing, Role: Traffic Engineer NE 25th Avenue&NE 36th Avenue PD&E Studies, Marion County, FL-Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Studies (CAT EX Type II)to improve the capacity and reduce travel delays associated with the railroad crossings on both NE 25th Avenue and NE 36th Avenue from SR 492/NE 14th Street to NE 35th Street in Ocala, Florida (3 miles). The PD&E studies evaluated intersection improvements, the potential widening of both corridors from two to four lanes and the feasibility of providing a bridge overpass over the CSX at the railroad crossings for both roadways. Tasks included the existing and future operational analysis based on a SimTraffic microsimulation of both corridors and preparation of the DTTM. Trip generation for each driveway was also performed based on existing land use to reflect driveway activity and its impacts on traffic operations of the corridor. Assignments also included review of noise documentation and noise abatement recommendations for impacted receptors. Client: FDOT District 5,Contact: Jazlyn Heywood (386) 943-5388, BeginlEnd Dates: June 2013-September 2015, Role: Traffic Engineer US-27/SR 251Okeechobee Road from NW 79th Avenue to SR 997/Krome Avenue PD&E Study-The study aims to perform conceptual design and environmental study of roadway enhancements, frontage road enhancements, signalized intersection improvements, interchange modifications, and bridge widening to US 27/SR 25/Okeechobee Road from NW 79th Avenue to SR 997/Krome Avenue (9.626 mile corridor) in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Responsibilities include the existing and future operational analysis for a network of over 25 intersections (using Synchro 8 and Vissim) including an eight entrance traffic circle with grade separation, preparation of the DTTM, public involvement and review of noise study report. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact: Bao-Ying Wang, PE(305)470-5211, Begin/End Dates: May 2012-Ongoing, Role: Traffic Engineer Districtwide Traffic Operations Studies Consultant Services - The general purpose of this contract is to provide traffic engineering services through the development of various traffic operations studies that will be identified for intersections, arterials, etc., and related improvement recommendations and evaluations. Client: FDOT District 6, Contact:Esteban Espinal (305) 470- 5330, Begin/End Dates:January 2010-January 2015, Role: Traffic Engineer • Alton Road&13h Street Signal Warrant Analysis • SR 5 Biscayne Boulevard @ NE 38h Street Left Turn Phase Warrant • Overseas Highway @ Anne's Beach Pedestrian Crossing&Speed Study • J.F.K. Causeway @ Harbor Isles(Fire Station Signal Removal) • Lehman Causeway @ Country Club Drive Level of Service Analysis 165 [r'\ METRIC Ryan St. George `g ENGINEERING Senior Environmental Scientist TECHNICAL EXPERTISE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE Bvrircnmeniai °errne5ng Mr. St. George started at Metric Engineering in April, 2015. Prior to joining Metric's Reg.latory COTO!ance team, he spent eight years as a Natural Resource Specialist II for Broward .?etland 5=_lireatien=,aluater County's Aquatic and Wetland Resource Program primarily serving as a lead YEARS OF EXPERIENCE wetland permit application reviewer and compliance/enforcement officer, and 4 13 "ears years with Miller Legg as an Environmental Scientist. He now provides EDUCATION environmental permitting. wetland delineation, mitigation monitoring and design, natural resource survey, and related support services for a variety of projects. Mr. i^ Marine 3.oloo/ St. George has strong relationships with Federal, State, and local regulatory staff Non 3.u-o as: rn 15F .2_ and an in-depth familiarity with environmental permitting requirements in the South Sa it P;!'etfa Sc cg/ 3 ',Igr1. Florida region. o'Rhece Is aed. !'905: REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Metric Engineering, 2015-present MEMBERSHIPS &TRAINING Continuing Professional Services- Environmental Engineering and Wetland FI ;ani a i Sc,er P'NS. Management-City of Weston, FL-Involves continued contractor oversight and Se:e:y of t:and Se en:iss `la. 1;98 comprehensive management of over 2,200 acres of City-responsible wetlalnd Car'.fed L ndscace :nspec:r i:LI... mitigation in western Broward County. Work includes mitigation site inspections, Jssape nscecors e;soc of Per da hydrologic observation, evaluation of treatment effectiveness, treatment Gerd'ca.:on No 2013-129 prioritization, invoice reviews, public relations, and miscellaneous environmental Ft.=Ce^.'•ed Stornwe:er Pros on arc support services. Client: City of Weston, Reference: Karl Thompson (954) 385- Seshzentaton Control inspector 2600 Begin/End Dates:July 2016 to present. Primary Role: Project Manager =.2,C1 Scuba Cerjficacons 1-4 St. Johns River Bridge Security - Seminole and Volusia Counties, FL - -J,anc-J Rescce:first?id :Titre. Ongoing environmental support for a bridge security upgrades design project. ., ..�. 9c aver Training-2003 Work completed includes corridor environmental analysis,site inspection, resource r -� ��d -:cr Sclenc. - iAAJ�I delineation, and all environmental permitting tasks including coordination with USACE, SJRWMO, and SHPO. Client FDOT District IV. Reference: Jim Miller Sisson-1 & CZ-SI i eation i raining @FDOT,Alex Mims @ Traffic Engineering Data Solutions, Inc. , Project Duration: 25'3 &2055 PC= August 2016 to present, Primary Role: Sr. Environmental Scientist. L P.I;.PJ Training HEFT (SR 821) Widening Design Build - Dade County, FL - Ongoing 201,.3 215.e environmental support for an FTE design-build project along 10 miles of existing OFFICE LOCATION turnpike. Work completed includes corridor environmental analysis, site =c :Le_derda!e';Gani F_ inspection, and all environmental permitting tasks including coordination with USACE and SFWMD (ROW and ERP). Client, FTE/BCC Engineering, Inc. Reference: Ariel Millan, BCC Engineering. Inc. Project Duration: September 2015 to present, Primary Role: Sr. Environmental Scientist. Pigeon Key Access Ramp Rehabilitation Environmental Permitting, Monroe County, FL: Ongoing environmental planning and permitting support for an historic bridge repair/replacement project. Work includes benthic, mangrove. and wetland resource surveys/delineations, and permit coordination with the SFWMD, USACE, and Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary as well as cultural resource coordination through SHPO, Client: Monroe County. Reference: Judith Clark(305) 295-4329. , Project Duration: April 2015 to present, Primary Role: Sr. Environmental Scientist. Districtwide Mitigation Site Development, Maintenance and Monitoring, Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties, FL • Involves the maintenance, monitoring and creation/remediation of mitigation sites throughout the District, and includes work on 23 sites throughout the District. Includes developing scopes of construction work for contractors for mitigation site development and maintenance, conducting field oversight, inspection of contractor work operations to document compliance with environmental protection measures, and creating remedial mitigation plans. Client: FDOT District 6. Reference: Susanne Travis(305)470-5139, Project Duration: May 2013 to present, Primary Role: Sr. Environmental Scientist Dagny Johnson Key Largo Hammock State Park - Habitat Restoration Project, Monroe County, FL, Sr. Environmental Inspector - Responsible for coordinating contractor scope of work, daily contractor oversight, and environmental compliance documentation associated with demolition and debris removal activities within the park in accordance with USFWS requirements.The park is managed by FDEP,and the project is funded by Monroe County as mitigation for habitat impacts associated with the County's recently constructed wastewater treatment plant. Work includes contractor oversight, field monitoring, and reporting to ensure 166 Ryan St. George Senior Environmental Scientist compliance with permit and USFWS BO conditions intended to benefit the endangered Key Largo woodrat and Key Largo cottonmouse.Client: Monroe County,Contact: Beth Berg(305)304-4442, Begin/End Dates: June 2013 to May., 2016 1.75 Phase II ITS Installation Environmental Permitting Support,Alachua, Columbia, and Hamilton Counties, FL: Responsible for oversight of field staff for conducting a wetland delineation and listed gopher tortoise survey for 87 miles of ITS installation, in support of environmental permitting. Tasks include FDOT and agency coordination, preparation of permit applications to FDEP and USACE for authorization of work in regulated wetlands and drainage features.Client: FDOT District 2. Reference: Keith Slater, P.E. Project Length:2.78 miles; Project Duration:January 2016 to present. Primary Role: Sr. Env. Scientist. 1-75(SR-93A)High Mast Lighting, Manatee County, FL: Responsible for wetland and protected species coordination for high-mast lighting replacement activities within a 2.78 mile long, 279 acre proposed project corridor. Obtained Federal and State permits. Tasks include FDOT and agency coordination, preparation of permit applications to SWFWMD and USACE for authorization of temporary work within and adjacent to regulated wetlands and surface water features. Client: FDOT District 1. Reference: Eric Shimer, P.E. (386)292-5830 Project Length: 87 miles;Project Duration: May 2015 to present. Primary Role: Sr. Env. Scientist. Davie Road Improvements Local Area Program (LAP) Documentation: Provided protected species (burrowing owl) survey, and environmental documentation on behalf of Broward County to ensure compliance with federal requirements associated with a federally funded roadway improvement project.Client: Broward County. Primary Role:Sr. Environmental Scientist. SR 520 Roadway Improvements Environmental Permitting Support, Brevard County, FL: Provided natural resource/wetland delineation and environmental permitting support for this 3.10 mile roadway improvement project including sidewalk, safety and drainage improvements. Permitting was performed through the USACE and SJRWMD. Client: FDOT District 5. Primary Role: Sr. Environmental Scientist. New Oxford Road • Environmental Permitting Support, Seminole County, FL: Conducting field wetland delineation using sub- meter GPS, providing wildlife habitat assessments, and environmental permitting support for a proposed new roadway alignment. Includes coordination with the County, USAGE and the SJRWMD.Client: Seminole County. Primary Role: Sr. Env. Scientist. Broward County, 2007- 2015- Served as a wetland permit (license) reviewer and compliance/enforcement officer for public and private development projects on behalf of the County's Aquatic and Wetland Resources Program. Primary duties included review of environmental permit applications, field assessments and habitat evaluations, wetland delineations and jurisdictional determinations, seagrass and mangrove surveys, mitigation compliance inspections, technical support for enforcement actions, providing expel witness testimony in administrative hearings, and conducting intra- and inter-agency coordination to carry out programmatic duties outlined in Chapter 27. Article XI, Broward County Code. Major Projects Reviewed: • Pond Apple Slough - Technical Review of complex and time-sensitive FDOT-District IV mangrove mitigation project proposed on County-owned property and requiring careful and detailed coordination between agencies. • West Lake Park - Licensing and compliance assurance for mangrove, seagrass, mudflat, and coastal tree hammock creation and restoration project in Broward County's largest park in the Cities of Hollywood and Dania Beach. • Port Everglades Tuming Notch Mangrove Creation/Enhancement - ±16 acre mangrove creation project within Port Everglades combined with an additional ±50 acre enhancement project to generate up-front mitigation credit. • FIND ICWW and Dania Cutoff Canal Deepening - large scale (3.5 miles) channel dredging efforts in federal navigation channels with seagrass,mangrove,and coral resource conflicts, manatee concerns,and turbidity conflicts. • Sterling Ranches-±100 acre residential development with a 12.5 acre on-site freshwater wetland mitigation. Miller Lego, 2004-2007-Performed permitting and compliance related support for private and public sector development projects as part of a multi-disciplinary consulting team. Tasks included wetland delineations, mitigation monitoring events, specific purpose site inspections,gopher tortoise, burrowing owl, caracara and scrub jay surveys, mitigation design,habitat assessments, and construction oversight. Pembroke Pines City Center, Phase C-Obtained Federal, State, and County environmental permits for±193 acre multi-purpose development of public town-center in the city of Pembroke Pines. Tasks included mitigation design and survey coordination necessary for the construction of±28 acres of on-site mitigation. West Lake Park-Developed final construction level plans based on detailed field verification of design constraints and construction feasibility issues associated with the conceptual permit sketches, and modified master permits with Federal, State, and Local agencies accordingly. Multi-habitat mitigation design included mangrove,seagrass,mudflat, and coastal hammock habitats. Florida Wetlands Bank Outparcel Additions - Mitigation design and permitting and construction oversight for two 8.5 acre outparcels adjacent to the 450-acre Florida Wetlandsbank in the City of Pembroke Pines 167 4• ' P L U S U R B I AMegan McLaughlin megan@plusurbia.com +1.305.444.4850 MEGAN MCLAUGHLIN, AICP, is a certified planner and urban designer who has extensive public and private sector experience in urban planning and historic preservation for cities in South Florida and nationwide. McLaughlin has vast experience in land use planning to support economic development along transit corridors, and has authored a variety of land use regulations to support walkable, transit-supportive development, including form-based codes, comprehensive plans, traditional zoning regulations, and masterplan reports.An integral part of her planning practice is fostering public involvement in order to shape master plans and land use policies that have strong community support. Prior to joining PlusUrbia, McLaughlin worked in the Planning Departments of the City of Miami and the City of Coral Gables, where her responsibilities included drafting land use policy, organizing community workshops, project review and adoption, and day-to-day administration of zoning and comprehensive plan regulations. In addition, she has experience working on masterplans,form-based codes,and comprehensive plans in cities throughout the country. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE SELECTED PROJECTS PlusUrbia Design Planning Leader Urban Design for 395 Signature Bridge Design-Build Miami, FL 2017-present Miami, FL 55 AC City of Coral Gables City Planner Urban Designer on Design-Build team for $800 million Coral Gables FL 2014 -2016 signature 395 bridge submission. Innovative design to City of Miami Interim Preservation Officer reconnect the city's fabric through vibrant urban space Miami. FL 2011 -2014 that will bring cohesion to historic Overtown. Community input drove contextual design of water features, City of Miami Historic Preservation Planner recreation space, an urban forest, a community garden Miami, FL 2011 -2012 and a dramatic pedestrian bridge on newly-available land Dover, Kohl& Partners Project Director/Planner under 395. Coral Gables, FL 2007 -2011 Little Havana Revitalization City of Miami Urban Design Technician Miami, FL 1,700 AC Miami, FL 2005-2006 Exclusive local planning studio for partnership with the EDUCATION National Trust for Historic Preservation that will preserve the authenticity of Little Havana while providing policy University of Miami recommendations for proper growth and development Master of Architecture 2007 of a residential neighborhood in walking distance of Downtown Miami. Revitalization plan includes design College of William& Mary for healthy living, complete streets and multimodal Bachelor of Art History 2004 transportation. AWARDS Village of El Portal Form-Based Code APA National Economic Development Plan Award El Portal, FL 256 AC Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization 2017 Creation of new municipal zoning ordinance and Dade Heritage Trust Annual Preservation Award companion Comprehensive Plan amendments. Little Havana National Treasure 2017 Recommendations focus on mixed-use Town Center and corridor legislation that will generate new economic Dade Heritage Trust sources and provide a destination for the Village in close Distinguished Community Service 2015 proximity to a planned future transit station. APA Texas Comprehensive Planning Award* Plan El Paso Comprehensive Plan 2012 AFFILIATIONS US EPA National Award for Smart Growth* American Institute of Certified Planners(AICP) Connecting El Paso TOD Plan 2011 Member Miami-Dade County MPO CNU Charter Award* Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee DR/GR Plan Growth Management Plan 2010 Dade Heritage Trust APA Virginia Comprehensive Planning Award* Board Member Richmond Downtown Plan 2009 APA Florida Award of Merit* DR/GR Plan Growth Management Plan 2009 168 a v •• • megan@plusurbia.com +1.305.444.4850 SELECTED PROJECTS North Ponce• Mixed-Use Overlay District* Mediterranean Village* Coral Gables, FL 1 Linear Mile Coral Gables, FL 6.7 AC Authored Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Text Conducted all design analysis on behalf of the City and and Map Amendments for the North Ponce de Leon drafted solutions for improved efficiency of this Planned Boulevard trolley corridor. Regulations included Transfer Area Development. Partnered with City's consultant to of Development Rights program updates, adjustments to draft form-based zoning regulations for the project area. maximum density and FAR, and building massing and creating a higher standard for development in this area step back provisions to protect residential neighborhood and focusing on high-quality Mediterranean architecture. from large-scale mixed-use projects along Ponce de Coordinated City consultants and stakeholders while guiding Leon Boulevard. the applicant through a complex development review process. Plans approved for 227 residential units, 180 hotel U.S. 1/Red/Sunset Corridor Visioning Workshop* rooms,290,000 SF of office and 289,000 SF of retail. Coral Gables, FL 2.8 Linear Miles Organized and directed a two-day session featuring Coral Gables Zoning Code Guidebook* broad stakeholder input on the future character Coral Gables, FL NA of development along the US1 corridor, including Analyzed Coral Gables' existing land development management of traffic generated by US1 and ways of regulations and created a user-friendly document that protecting residential areas from intensive commercial translates text-based regulations into clear diagrams, development. Key topics included strategies to improve illustrations and tables. Used analysis to draft pedestrian character, quality and connectivity of public recommendations for zoning code text amendments. space, streets and planning to make the Underline an Created companion guidebooks for Mediterranean integral part of the city. Transit-Oriented Development— Architecture, Signage, Single-Family Houses and North to reduce traffic and make car-free mobility an option for Ponce area apartment buildings. area residents and University of Miami students, faculty and staff—was explored. Connecting El Paso TOD Plan* Downtown Overlay* El Paso, TX 450 AC Coral Gables, FL 200 AC Connecting El Paso focuses on areas which are expected Drafted form based zoning regulations to enhance to become new centers of the City under the City's new the pedestrian character of Downtown Coral Gables transit plan: Remcon Circle, 5 Points, and the Oregon and to encourage beautiful, economically sustainable, Corridor. The plan also proposes redevelopment at the and controlled development. The overlay will provide former ASARCO site, which includes over 450 acres of incentives for small and medium-scale development, developable land. to encourage sustainable, controlled growth, small Downtown Richmond Master Plan* business development,an active residential population, and beautiful streets and public spaces. The Overlay Richmond, VA 2,176 AC was developed through community input and close More than 800 citizens and stakeholders joined a team collaboration with the Business Improvement District of of experts in discussing housing,transportation planning, Coral Gables. parks, and economic development in a seven-day Gables Station* charrette. The resulting Master Plan reflects the range of community brainstorming and design input,which will Coral Gables, FL 4.3 AC ultimately guide growth and ensure quality development Staff review (including comprehensive plan and zoning in the City's historic center. code amendments recommendations) of major mixed- use project on US 1 corridor in close proximity to the Plan El Paso* Douglas Metrorail Station and the Coral Gables Trolley. El Paso, TX 250 square miles The proposed large-scale project includes a hotel, The Comprehensive Plan is an overarching policy commercial space, housing and about two acres of park document that directs the City of El Paso in its space.It will have 460 residential units,a 66 unit extended- implementation of consensus-based goals created • stay hotel and ground floor retail. The development, through an extensive public process.The goals,objectives, along the proposed Underline urban pathway, also will and strategies of the plan involve land use,urban design, have arcades plantings, trees art, fountains, trees and historic preservation, economic development, housing, park space. transportation, health, sustainability, infrastructure and public facilities. 'denotes experience prior to PiusUrbia Design 169 • •• llerat • juan@plusurbia.com +1.305.213.4410 JUAN MULLERAT (Assoc. AIA, APA, CNU, NCI) is an urban planner and architectural designer with 20 years of experience.As founder and principal of PlusUrbia Design.he has completed numerous transit oriented development,complete streets, corridors, planning, park/open/civic space and zoning code projects around the world including North and South America, Europe,Asia and the Middle East. Mullerat excels at leading public workshops that have resulted in award-winning master plans,development projects and land use policies on a variety of scales. His work strives to create and capture the essence of places, transcending style and celebrating local culture. It is Mullerat's belief that a society can be understood by the nature of its streets and public spaces. His vision has resulted in several awards both as an individual and as leader of PlusUrbia. Mullerat frequently lectures on context-sensitive, healthy and transit oriented design. His projects have been published in dozens of books, magazines, newspapers and websites. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE SELECTED PROJECTS PlusUrbia Design Principal Hialeah Transit Oriented Development Districts Miami. FL 2009- present Hialeah, FL 313 AC University of Miami-Architecture Professor Master plan and land-use policy for Transit Oriented Miami, FL 2010-present Development (TOD) around the city's Market District and Transfer rail stations. Supports compact, mixed- EDUCATION use development around advantageous rail connectivity. Creates affordable housing with rail connectivity to job University of Miami centers throughout the County and region. Master of Architecture 2004 Master of Urban Design 2004 Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization District University of North Carolina at Charlotte Miami, FL 273 AC Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies 2000 Crafted a national model for urban zoning codes to Bachelor of Arts in Architecture 1999 support creative industries, mixed-use,transit-supportive development, proper urban scale and green space. AWARDS Created policies for preservation, affordable housing. centralized parking and complete streets. APA National Economic Development Plan Award Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization 2017 PUBLICATIONS + EXHIBITIONS Dade Heritage Trust Annual Preservation Award Florida APA Annual Conference Little Havana National Treasure 2017 Speaker-Density and Health in Little Havana 2016 APA Florida 2016 Award of Excellence FitCity Miami 3/American Institute of Architects Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization 2016 Speaker-The Health of the Inner Suburbs 2016 ULI Southeast Florida/Caribbean Vision Award American Planning Association Florida Conference Wynwood Walls Garden Collaboration 2016 Speaker-Wynwood NRD Plan 2015 APA Gold Coast Chapter 2015 Best Plan Award Miami Herald, Miami FL Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization 2015 Character of Little Havana, Op-Ed 2015 10th Annual KINPAN Award-China Songhua Lake Resort Architectural Design 2015 AFFILIATIONS APA's 2015 America's Great Places Award American Institute of Architects(AIA) Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization 2015 Associate Member/Miami Chair of Urban Design PlusUrbia Design Day-Miami City Commission APA Gold Coast Chapter Calle Ocho Corridor Revitalization Initiative 2015 Board Member CNU XXII Charter Awards-Best City Plan American Planning Association (APA) City of Curridabat, Costa Rica 2014 Member Urban Designer of the Year Congress for New Urbanism(CNU) Member AIA Miami 2013 National Charrette Institute(NCI) Member 170 •• llerat • juan@plusurbia.com +1.305.213.4410 SELECTED PROJECTS Urban Design for 395 Signature Bridge Design-Build Calle 8 Revitalization Miami. FL 55 AC Miami. FL 2 linear miles Urban Designer on Design-Build team for $800 million PlusUrbia. with strong ties to Miami's Southwest 8th signature 395 bridge submission. Innovative design to Street. or Calle Ocho, initiated this proposal to restore reconnect the city's fabric through vibrant urban space the corridor as a walkable pedestrian-oriented main that will bring cohesion to historic Overtown. Community street for Little Havana. The firm has created images of input drove contextual design of water features. a 21st century Calle Ocho with multimodal transportation recreation space. an urban forest. a community garden alternatives such as dedicated bike and transit lanes, and a dramatic pedestrian bridge on newly-available land comfortable wide sidewalks and additional safe under 395. crosswalks in a vibrant urban setting. Hialeah Complete Streets Plan Lujiao Antler Town Hialeah, FL 19.7 square miles Chongqing. China 673 AC A Complete Streets plan was created to ensure that rail ChonggingAntlerTown isdesigned tcset new benchmarks transit in two TODs is connected to wide sidewalks, safe in senior living and sustainability, while harmoniously street crossings. bike lanes and public transit.Guidelines integrating the surrounding landscape and built form. can be applied citywide to ensure dense, mixed-use Located in the vicinity of Chongqing's City Center.the site districts will be served by multimodal mobility. is served by several metro trains and buses that connect it to the rest of the region. The advantage of mass transit Little Havana Revitalization is fully integrated into the design. Miami, FL 1,700 AC • Town Square/Adrienne Arsht Center Park Plaza Exclusive local planning studio for partnership with the National Trust for Historic Preservation that will preserve Miami. FL 10 AC the authenticity of Little Havana while providing policy Created a unique plaza and flexible urban park space to recommendations for proper growth and development serve performing arts hub. Performed master planning, of a residential neighborhood in walking distance of open space design and general planning services for the Downtown Miami. Revitalization plan includes design neighborhood anchored by the Adrienne Arsht Center. for healthy living. complete streets and multimodal The design is meant to harmonize with the adjacent transportation. planned 395 signature bridge and 50-acre urban space that will be created under the new span. Village of El Portal Form-Based Code El Portal, FL 256 AC Curridabat Creation of new municipal zoning ordinance. Curridabat, Costa Rica 2,300 AC Recommendations focus on a mixed-use Town Center The plan humanizes the city with wider sidewalks, and corridor legislation that will generate new economic parallel parking, planting strips and urban furniture. sources and provide a destination for the Village. A form-based code creates a properly-scaled built PlusUrbia translated the vision created by the Village environment to sustain the pedestrian-friendly city. The during its 2013 Charrette into a visual, user friendly and plan structures future development by ensuring smart easy to review document known as a form-based code. growth and providing a safe and innovative environment for its citizens. PortSide Miami Waterfront Selected as"Best City Plan"by the CNU 2014. Miami, FL 53 AC PortSide is designed to attract tourists with a range Santa Barbara Master Plan & Form-Based Code of hotel options while also creating a new trade and Quetzaltenango, Guetamala 315 AC service district. The plan for dense urban development The Santa Barbara site belongs to the Archdiocese of Los emphasizes multimodal connectivity to the mainland. Altos, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala's second largest city. Retail, office and hotels will provide round the clock The Archdiocese needed a land management plan that activity, transform PortSide Miami's underutilized land would support comprehensive development on land that into the premier urban district in South Florida. would continue to serve the church. The plan supports housing,jobs, education and open space. 171 tierra ' SOUTH FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE KUMAR VEDULA, P.E. Mr. Vedula, a Florida-Registered Professional Engineer, has over 21 years of experience providing PRINCIPAL GEOTECHNICAL engineering services for a wide variety of geotechnical projects involving foundation design, slope ENGINEER stability analysis, WEAP analysis and interpreting PDA reports, excavation support, and 21 Years of Experience construction inspection. His extensive experience includes foundation inspections (shallow and deep foundations), soil modification (dynamic compaction. stone columns). preloading, excavations. backfilling, and post construction monitoring. Mr. Vedula has served as a principal inspector on numerous surcharging and settlement evaluations of organic laden soils assignments. 414. it, t r. His project experience includes 300+ geotechnical engineering studies for various projects types including parks, piers, shoreline stabilization, dredging. bridges. roadways. utilities, high rise - buildings, schools and government facilities. Mr. Vedula has authored and co-authored papers published in national and international publications. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE SR-997 (Krome Avenue) from SR-94/Kendall Drive to SR-90/SW 8 Street, Miami-Dade County, Florida Mr. Vedula is the Senior Engineer for the geotechnical engineering services for the project which consists of the realignment of Krome Avenue from SR 94 (Kendall Drive) to SR 90 (Tamiami Trail) in Miami, Florida. The project is approximately 5 miles long. The improvements include the realignment of the existing roadway. The purpose of the study was to provide geotechnical input to the design team to assist in evaluation of the merits of the roadway improvements. Field work included auger borings and muck probes. Utilities, including a 30-inch 3 force main and water main, which were to remain in place, were factored into geotechnical recommendations and proposed options. Geotechnical recommendations included the discussion of various options such as surcharge. reinforced soil platform. geo-synthetic, demucking and soil EDUCATION mixing. TSF also provided geotechnical recommendations involving permanent cut/fill slopes, MS in Geotechnical excavations, groundwater control, pavement design, and on site soil suitability. TSF is currently Engineering. University of providing construction support services including evaluation of surcharge settlement. Memphis, 1995 1-75 Express Lanes Segment AIB from NW 170th Street to South of Miramar Parkway, BE in Civil Engineering,Andhra Broward & Miami-Dade Counties, Florida Mr. Vedula is the Geotechnical Foundation Design University, 1992 Engineer of Record (GFDEOR) for the project. Performed a geotechnical study for the design and construction of Segments A&B of the 1-75 Express Lanes Project which extend from just north of NW 170th Street in Miami-Dade County at milepost 3.485 to approximately 2,400 feet south of PROFESSIONAL Miramar Parkway in Broward County at milepost 1.080, for a total distance of approximately 3.1 ORGANIZATION AND miles. The project also includes reconstruction, widening, and milling and resurfacing of the HEFT REGISTRATION mainline from 1.45 miles south to 1.13 miles north of 1-75 to accommodate the Express Lanes Median to Median Direct Connect between 1-75 and the HEFT, as well as other interchange ramp Professional Engineer: Florida, connections. This corridor includes fourteen (14) bridge structures, several associated MSE Walls, 54873 about 20,000 linear feet of sound walls, Toll Gantries, CCTV poles. High Mast Light Poles, and American Society of Civil Overhead Sign Structures. Provided pile design for bridges, and design parameters for sound Engineers, Past President walls. poles, and sign structures. Currently providing pile driving inspections and auger cast pile (Browa Engineedrs, Branch) inspections for sound walls.and foundation certifications for bridges and sound walls. 1-95 Express Lanes from the Golden Glades in Miami-Dade County to Broward Boulevard in Broward County, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering study for the extension of the High Occupancy Toll Express lanes from northern Miami-Dade County north 13 miles to Fort Lauderdale. The project included installing Intelligent Transportation System components; modifying the Ives Dairy Rd interchange; bridge widening at specific locations and installing new noise barrier walls at locations between Hollywood Blvd. and Taft St. Performed geotechnical study for roadway widening, bridge widening. overhead signs, MSE walls, toll equipment gantries and buildings. During construction, provided pile driving inspection and foundation certification. 172 tierra IP SOUTH FLORIDA RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE, Continued KUMAR VEDULA, P.E. HEFT Widening from Campbell Drive to US-1— PD&E Study, Miami-Dade County, Florida PRINCIPAL GEOTECHNICAL Performed a preliminary geotechnical engineering data review of available United States Department of ENGINEER Agriculture (USDA) soil maps. In general, based on the review of the existing subsurface information, 21 Years of Experience TSF did not anticipate any major constraint to the proposed improvements that were currently under consideration. TSF noted that based on existing soil information. organic soils(muck) and silty soils will Page 2 of 2 be encountered at isolated locations and should be anticipated along the study area. TSF provided a technical memorandum delineating the results of our review. TSF also completed a preliminary geotechnical data collection for the subject widening project to assist in the preparation of the RFP package for the design-build project. Field work consisted of auger borings, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings, collection/delivery of bulk samples for Resilient Modulus (MR) testing to FDOT's Gainesville laboratory, and Double Ring Infiltration Tests (DRIT). Provided a geotechnical engineering report detailing subsurface and groundwater conditions along the corridor. Grove Isle Seawall Repair, Biscayne Bay, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering study for the seawall repair project for the southern portion of the seawall. Provided geotechnical discussion of subsurface and groundwater conditions. Provided soil parameters for foundation design for new steel sheet piles. SR A1A/Ocean Drive-Shoreline Stabilization for FDOT District IV, St. Lucie County, Florida. Performed geotechnical engineering study for the possible use of sheet pile to stabilize some sections of the shoreline along SR AlA/Ocean Drive from MP 3.3 to MP 5.9. Provided soil parameters be considered in determining earth pressures for proposed sheet pile wall and other geotechnical recommendations. Structural Remediation of Seawall at Sundance Marina, Jensen Beach, Florida. Performed geotechnical study which included subsurface exploration and recommendations for the structural improvement of seawall below two existing structures (motor storage and boat storage buildings). Pressure grouting was considered to improve the soils along the sea wall and below the structures. Completed on time and within budget. CR 707/Indian River Drive, St. Lucie County, Florida Performed a geotechnical engineering study which included a slope stability analysis for the existing embankment along CR-707/Indian River Drive for the Florida Department of Transportation, District 4. The purpose of the geotechnical study was to analyze the slope stability of the embankment along CR 707/Indian River Drive which was repaired after Hurricanes Jeanne and Francis in 2004. Slope stability analysis of the slope was performed using the computer program "STABLPRO" from ENSOFT, INC. Soil parameters were utilized for the soil types encountered and the slope stability analysis yielded that the estimated safety factor for the most critical failure surface exceeded the minimum requirement. Design-Build Rehabilitation of West Bridge and Bear Cut Bridge on Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami-Dade County, Florida Performed geotechnical engineering study for the bridge widening. The project included constructing French drains on the east and west sides of the bridge. Performed pile capacity analysis and prepared soil parameters and providing geotechnical engineering recommendations. Performed studies to determine the length and pile capacity of the existing bridge (unknown foundation study). 173 WALKER Jon Martins,AICP,CAPP PARKING CONSULTANTS Jon specializes in parking planning and operations consulting on a variety of projects for municipalities, developers, hospitals, airports, colleges, and universities. Jon earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Organizational Leadership and Supervision from Purdue University. Jon is a Certified Administrator of Public Parking(CAPP) and American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). Jon is a frequent presenter at various parking conferences across the US,often discussing new technology the is changing the face of the parking industry. Jon has also written and co-wrote articles for industry publications including "Parking: More Customers, Less Cost"The Parking Professional, March 2013. Prior to joining Walker,Jon spent more than ten years in a variety of operations and management positions. Jon's assignments included City Manager for a national parking operator in Indianapolis, Indiana. The following are a few examples of his recent projects: City of Miami Beach Parking Planning Studies, Miami Beach, FL Project Manager led a series of studies to quantify the City's on and off-street parking assets in South Beach, Mid-Beach and North Beach. The studies evaluated the potential impact on the future parking demand associated with proposed development projects. Studies reports provided recommendations of areas within the City where additional parking assets should be developed. City of Cocoa Beach Downtown Parking Management Study,Cocoa Beach, FL Project Manager led a supply/demand study of the City's on and off-street parking assets in the Downtown business district and development of an integrated parking management plan for the City to ease congestion and illegal parking. Riviera Beach CRA—Marina District Parking Planning, Riviera Beach, FL Project Manager led a parking supply/demand,shared parking and alternatives studies of the proposed Marina District project which would create a new mixed-use entertainment district along the waterfront adjacent to the Port of Palm Beach. Sarasota City Wide Parking Study, Sarasota, FL Project Manager led a parking supply/demand study of the on and off-street parking in Downtown Sarasota,the Marina District and St. Armands' Circle to assist the City address various parking challenges across the City. Dunedin Parking Management Study, Dunedin, FL Project Manager led a parking supply/demand study of the on and off-street parking in Downtown Dunedin, conducted alternatives analysis to identify the most appropriate location for new parking infrastructure and developed a paid parking action plan with recommendations for the evaluation of the technology and equipment for paid parking system. 174 WTL +a Tom Moriarity, Principal Tom Moriarity has a background in urban mixed-use development, commercial area management, retail programming in specialized environments, downtown revitalization strategies and historic preservation projects. As Principal Consultant with WTL+a, he brings over 30 years of experience in real estate consulting, most recently as a Principal and Vice- President with Economics Research Associates/ERA in Washington, D.C. Mr. Moriarity was a founder of the National Trust Main Street Program as one of the original three Downtown Managers and later, of the National Main Street Center in Washington, D.C. He received an Honor Award from the National Trust in 2006 for his Main Street Program activities. His work focuses on the economics and planning of downtowns and mixed-use areas, with a special emphasis on redevelopment of historic and commercial districts; transit- related development; collateral development for institutional property owners; market realities of tourism areas; and, market-based concept development to create and strengthen destination locations is a primary skill. He is a frequent speaker at conferences, training programs and seminars, and has lectured on commercial area and downtown renewal, the economics of historic preservation and destination concept development. In 2009, he was the U.S representative speaker for the International Business Forum in Shanghai, China. He is a Full Member of ULI and a member of the International Downtown Association (IDA). He holds both a Bachelor of Architecture (with Honors) as well as a Bachelor of Science in Architectural Studies from the University of Texas at Austin, 1974. Selected Florida Projects • North US 19 Corridor Market/Economic & Land Use Analysis HDR, Inc./Forward Pinellas (MPO) • North Airport & 56th Street Redevelopment Market Studies Hillsborough County, FL • Mayport CRA Plan Update VHB, Inc./City of Jacksonville • South Florida Avenue Revitalization Strategy, Lakeland Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, FDOT District 1 • Indian River Lagoon Economic Impact Analysis Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council • Waterways Master Plan, Martin & St. Lucie Counties Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council • Glades Region Master Plan Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 175 WTL +a • Call-In Real Estate Advisory Services Pinellas County Real Estate Department • Retail Market & Redevelopment Assessment for The Villages The Villages, Sumter and Lake Counties, FL • Downtown Miami Retail Strategy, Miami Downtown Development Authority • Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan & Business District Retail Assessment • Miami 21 Zoning Ordinance Economic Analysis - City of Miami Duany/Plater-Zyberk Associates (DPZ)/City of Miami • Botanical Gardens Revenue Development Plan Collier County, FL • Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC) TOD Plan & Economic Analysis Gannett Fleming, Inc./FDOT District 4 • Downtown Project Market & Real Estate Advisory Services City of Maitland • Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) Joint Development Programming Miami-Dade Expressway Authority/FDOT District 4 • Ocala CRA- Downtown Development Plan and Strategy • Expansion Analysis for Castillo de San Marco, St. Augustine National Park Service • Channel District Redevelopment Master Plan, Tampa Gibraltar Properties • Downtown Lakeland Redevelopment Plan City of Lakeland • Virginia Key Master Plan City of Miami • Historic Sites Revenue Analysis & Redevelopment Assessment City of St. Augustine/University of Florida • El Centro Espanol de Tampa Redevelopment Plan Historic Tampa/Hillsborough County Preservation Foundation WTL +a Real Estate & Economic Advisors Washington, DC Provincetown, MA 202.636.4002 301.502.4171 774.538.6070 176 I Tab 2 I Experience & Qualifications CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY H.W. Lochner, Inc. arranged for Dun&Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact Natalia Delgado, • 2017-126-KB 1177 TAB 3: APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY City of MIAMI BEACH Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER APPROACH TO WORK Lochner's in-house team of transportation planning and traffic engineering experts has an in-depth understanding of the local Miami Beach issues and have a depth of experience to assist in resolving them.Although there is no all-encompassing methodology to successfully completing a project,there are certain key components that are crucial in safeguarding the effectiveness of the process.The Lochner approach to a successful project includes the following key steps: 1. Clearly define the challenges and set objectives 2. Develop a feasible solution 3. Gain project acceptance and build public consensus Clearly Define the Challenges and Set Objectives The Lochner approach involves open discussions with City staff to identify any potential issues and develop a clear plan of resolution. Our staff has the resources necessary to help you define the challenges,determine your objectives, and most importantly, accomplish your goals.A crucial part of this process is to establish a vision of what the community wants and determine how the transportation system fits into this vision.Once the goals and objectives of the project have been established, a detailed scope and schedule is developed for each of the work assignments. Develop a Feasible Solution Project feasibility is determined by analyzing the various parameters specific to each project. The analysis allows our technical professionals to predict the impact of different alternatives.The results are compared to the previously established priorities and objectives to determine which solution will be most effective in addressing the problem while minimizing cost. Based on our experience,the accuracy of costs is a critical element in the evaluation of alternatives; consequently, each alternative is thoroughly reviewed by a member of our in-house design team to guarantee accurate cost estimates for each alternative,thus safeguarding the reliability of the decision making process. In addition,we are well aware of potential concerns relating to the constructability and feasibility of proposed recommendations. Consequently,we propose in our approach to the project an extensive in-house review of the final recommendations by a team member from our various departments(i.e.survey, roadway,drainage, bridge inspection, etc.)to ensure constructability and to identify any potential impacts resulting from these recommendations(i.e., right of way constraints, utility conflicts,ADA compliance, environmental, and permitting impacts among others). At this stage, it is also crucial to identify any agencies,governmental bodies or any other organizations that will have a stake in the appoval of the proposed alternatives. Gain Project Acceptance and Build Public Consensus The last stage of the process is to ensure that all concerns from stakeholders are addressed and to gain acceptance of the project not only from the City of Miami Beach but also from any other pertinent agencies. On similar contracts, Lochner performed presentations to municipal committees, Planning and Zoning(P&Z) Boards,the FDOT and City Commissions; our staff has experience in facilitating the approval of municipal projects at the County and State level,as well as providing coordination between municipalities and agencies. We recognize that preserving a safe and efficient roadway network can sometimes lead to projects that are controversial with regards to public acceptance. Our experience shows that in these instances,one of the most critical tasks is effective coordination and communication with all the major stakeholders(elected officials, other governmental agencies, and the general public).We are also aware of the importance of public perception in the 2017-126-KB I 1 — Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER success of a project.Therefore,we anticipate that our technical expertise and our extensive experience in building consensus will be valuable assets to the City during the public involvement phase of a project. APPROACH TO TRANSPORTATON PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Operational Analysis The Lochner team understands that although there is no all-encompassing methodology for performing a traffic operational or safety analysis; however,there are crucial steps.The Lochner Team utilizes a 10-step methodology to perform operational studies, such as Signal Warrant Analysis, Intersection/Arterial Operational Analysis, Left Turn Phase Warrant Analysis and other composite studies.These steps include: • Identify the exact limits that influence the location(s) • Perform crash analysis with collision diagrams • Check the work program/TIP/LRTP for existing programmed improvements • Check/review for previous studies in the area • Perform field AM/PM/off-peak field review • Collect required traffic data • Build existing condition microscopic/macroscopic simulation model • Test alternative recommendations(e.g.,signal timing/phasing/geometric improvements/etc.)to measure operational benefits for each performance measure • Calculate the Benefit-Cost(BC)and Net Present Value(NPV)of the improvements and • Document the findings Close coordination with the Project Manger and understanding the desired outcome is always key to developing the right methodology for each study. Fatal Crash Reviews Lochner staff has first-hand experience assisting FDOT D6 with fatal crash reviews and we can provide the same for Coral Gables.We extensive experience assisting with the FDOT fatal crash program,which included disposing numerous fatal crashes, assigning fatals, and reviewing fatal crash reviews while serving in-house. In general, if the fatal involves a Bike/Ped or Lane Departure,we must analyze five years crash data and use influence limits of 0.2 miles; and when analyzing other type of fatal crashes,three years of crash data is reviewed and a 0.1 mile influence limit is used. In any case, each fatality is unique and will be looked at on a case by case basis.For example,a fatal involving a suicide or DUI may not warrant further review,and that study limits may need to be extended for a high speed fatal, and for a fatal on a horizontal curve the limits should be extended to include the entire length of the curve. Lochner has developed a six-step approach to fatal crash reviews that includes: 1. Performing an Office Review 2. Obtaining crash data 3. Preparing collision diagrams for relevant crashes 4. Performing Crash Analysis 5. Confirming that all relevant information has been reviewed 6. Based on crash analysis and collision diagrams, determine if crash pattern exist and if the fatal warrants a field visit and improvement recommendations 3R Safety Reviews While the City of Miami Beach is performing resurfacing, it is always a good idea to coordinate the project with minor operational or safety improvements, such as ADA ramps,cracked sidewalks or pedestrian features.As part of the 3R safety review process,we will investigate segment-wide crash patterns for wet crashes, dark condition crashes, 2017-126-KB 12 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R pedestrian/bike, lane departure, and fixed object crashes.The purpose of this investigation is to identify pavement, lighting, drainage, or fixed object improvements that could be addressed during the 3R project. The Lochner Alternatives Development Team includes our traffic, highway, structural, and construction engineers and coordinates and develops the recommended improvements.Cost estimates are developed by highway engineers utilizing the LRE and unit cost from recent push button contracts so that they are precise.This ensures that when improvements are programmed in the Beach's Capital Improvement Plan they are estimated correctly. APPROACH TO TRAFFIC IMPACT/SITE PLAN/DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW Lochner developed an intricate 15-step process to review development applications,which eliminates the risk of not completing the review on time and ensures the project budget is preserved. Each of the steps in our review process has been thoroughly tested and refined;and coincides with the review requirements stated in the RFQ. The process is listed, as follows: • Step 1: In regard to the Traffic Engineering Discipline, perform a comprehensive site plan review, as follows: 1. Verify site boundaries are clearly identified 2. Verify proposed land uses are shown 3. Verify vehicular circulation system for cars, bicycles and other required vehicle types,with indication of connection to public rights of way. Location of all parking and loading areas. 4. Verify all adjacent right of way,with indication of ultimate right of way line,center line,width, paving width, existing median cuts and intersections,street light poles and other utility facilities and easements are shown. 5. Verify pedestrian circulation system 6. Verify the following computations are shown: a.Number of dwelling units and/or density for residential uses only b.Square footage of ground covered by buildings or structures and designation of use c.Required number of parking spaces d.Number of parking spaces provided 7. Verify site plan location sketch is shown 8. Verify geometry of all paved areas including centerlines,dimensions,turning radii and elevations are shown 9. Verify the location of the trash and garbage disposal system and provisions for accessibility to garbage trucks. Lochner performs an AutoTURN analysis,when applicable. 10. Verify that Loading Areas and provisions for accessibility to vehicles of the required type are provided 11. Verify that Areas for emergency vehicles and fire engines, and provisions for accessibility to vehicles of the required type are provided. Lochner performs an AutoTURN analysis,when applicable. 12. Verify street names and addresses for any proposed building within the site plan. Step 2: Confirm site address and perform field visits to verify access/ingress locations, access location, spacing and corner clearance;specifically identifying potential conflicts with existing roadway features (adjacent properties, signage, pavement markings and striping,turn bays, opposing driveways,etc.) Step 3: Review Transportation Demand Management Plan Step 4: Verify TIA trip generation calculation using latest ITE Trip Generation Manual Step 5: Verify TIA radius of influence or impact area Step 6: Verify data collection has been performed within the radius of influence in its entirety Step 7: Verify existing condition analysis complies with concurrency standards(intersection micro- simulation and link LOS); checking 95%queues for intersection and driveways 2017-126-KB I 3 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N ER Step 8: Verify project build-out year and/or phasing Step 9: Validate proposed growth rate that applicant has utilized to grow existing traffic to future background traffic Step 10: Verify future background analysis complies with concurrency standards(intersection micro- simulation and link LOS); checking 95%queues for intersection and driveways Step 11: Verify future background plus project trip analysis complies with concurrency standards(intersection micro-simulation and link LOS); checking 95%queues for intersection and driveways Step 12: Validate mitigation proposed for traffic impact, including geometric and operational impacts, if needed.Also, determine additional alternatives, if feasible Step 13: Review and validate study recommendations Step 14: Document review comments in memorandum and transmit to City staff within five days Step 15: Attend Board Meetings, conference calls with applicant and/or City staff, Commission Meetings and all other meetings until the application is approved or denied Utilizing this process, Lochner staff has successfully performed development review services with our clients and submit comments back to the City within one(1)week or shorter.We are well-informed with the City of Miami Beach Code of Ordinances,concurrency management system and application review process. Our proposed Project Manager is a proven and effective communicator and will work together with the City, providing high-quality rapid response to all work assignments under this contract. His ability to provide superior presentation talents to all agency committees, such as the Planning and Zoning(P&Z) Boards and City Commissions are irreplaceable.We have the ability to communicate and build project consensus within the public and all governmental agencies, including Miami-Dade County. • APPORACH TO CONNECTIVITY AND ROADWAY IMPROVMENTS Lochner's technical approach to roadway improvements will address the following key elements: • Review and Analysis of Existing Conditions • Establishing Proposed Geometrics • Utility Data Collection • Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation • Development of Roadway Design • Identification of Drainage and Permitting Requirements • Traffic Control Plan • Signing and Pavement Marking Plans • Roadway Lighting • ADA Requirements • Public Information • Design Documentation and Cost Estimates • Construction Administration In recent years and as a local firm, Lochner has direct experience on a wide range of roadway projects within Miami- Dade County, ranging from milling and resurfacing projects on local roads to complex design and reconstruction. 2017-126-KB 14 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITYOF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER APPROACH TO NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING The growth of Miami Beach has increased and the traffic using the local network, thus impacting the local and residential streets. Speeding and cut-through traffic often occur through the residential neighborhood streets affecting livability and safety. Lochner staff have developed both neighborhood and citywide traffic calming plans in Miami Dade County, most recently in South Miami, Miami Shores Village, Cutler Bay and Palmetto Bay.We understand not only the needs of the residents, but also what traffic flow modifications will be accepted by Darlene Fernandez, Claudia Diaz, and David Hayes, all from DTPW. Lochner understands that when performing any traffic calming study,the goals are to: 1. Make streets safer 2. Reduce travel speed 3. Reduce traffic volume and ultimately congestion But more specifically in the City of Miami Beach,to ensure the development of a safe,efficient and integrated transportation system that promotes neighborhood livability. Lochner will develop recommendations with the objective to: 1. Restore communities affected by speeding traffic 2. Discourage the use of local residential streets by heavy vehicles and cut-through traffic 3. Improve the quality of life in the neighborhoods 4. Improve roadway safety and reduce crashes 5. Improve safety and convenience for vulnerable road users,such as bicyclist and pedestrians 6. Change the attitude of drivers to understand that the streets are for people, as well as traffic 7. Reduce noise and disturbances We are familiar with Miami-Dade's Miami-Dade Traffic Flow Modification(s)Street Closure(s)procedures and thresholds for traffic calming.We are also aware that the City of Miami Beach has an approved Traffic Calming Manual and utilizes a two-step criteria point system based upon speed and traffic volumes for the first criteria and number of accidents for the second criteria for DTWP consideration for approvals. Lochner's approach to traffic calming is a multi-tiered approach with various levels of treatment ranging from physical treatments,psychological treatments,enforcement and educational programs.We have learned that although specific neighborhoods may request traffic calming, a citywide or regional approach is more beneficial,so that traffic issues are not pushed from one street to another adjacent street. Once locations are requested and identified, meet the scoring criteria, have approval from other stakeholding agencies and have the appropriate number of ballots, a prioritization and scoring system will be utilized to rank locations. 2017-126-KB I 5 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER Our approach will follow the approved procedure outlined in the Traffic Calming Manual and is summarized, as follows: I Application submitted b!. • 1 proem owners V City Public Works Department(PWD) I review and initial public meeting 1 Spcedivalume • Constotency checks:with kcal O sticky corducted plansprogramsJFolicles) • Warrarted•' Repro back to YES vU ",; Community • i; Submit study malts to County PWD for review • Prelimintry traffic calming plan prepared by • PWn • V ( ,1 PIan submitted to Fire,Police,and County PWD as well as otter \� aoenciet if needed for review and comments •• IaPPnved? - • U; Public meeting conducive $ Approved' • Ballots sent • `./ to reodenis 1 i Ballots race.ved& �`_) • submitted by residents i Plan prioritzed and 10 i inoicmcntcd • The point scoring system is shown as: First criteria: Points &4^speed is...above Points ! volume 33 hr. posted speed limit 05 lea than16mb 05 Slid-:5Ovei. 10 461o75 •. 10 751-1300veh. • ® _ :.0 to tc5 mri, IS _1.101-1700 volt 20 ... 106tu1S3 mph 219 ,'01-2300 vch. • 25136tot63m• 25 filum than 27mvett 9.0 more than 165 mph .- .._..__ fa[ r>case aereomelloe ev 1!Ydvveau��er Second criteria: Point. No.ofaeddenra • 0.5 1-2 to 13 4 amore • 2017-126-KB I 6 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH L O C H N E R Lochner understands that although it may be the desire of the neighborhood or street to implement traffic calming, but: 1. Any street that ranks above 2.5 or higher is eligible 2. Any street that ranks between 2.0 and 2.5 will be evaluated to determine if other measures may be helpful 3. Any street that ranks below 2.0 is ineligibles, but may be re-evaluated on an annual or bi-annual term As demonstrated, Lochner has the experience to implement a traffic calming program from A to Z including the development of actual construction documents and construction management of installation of the traffic calming devices. APPROACH TO MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION As congestion increases, more people are riding bikes and walking around Miami Beach than ever before.Active transportation is gaining strength and plays a key role in the life of Beach residents and visitors,who continue to seek alternative forms of transportation. Studies show that more than a third of people on Miami Beach at any one time are riding,walking or taking transit. In addition, nearly half of all commuters on the Beach use a mode of travel, other than a car.The Beach has adopted a pedestrian-first mode share hierarchy and supported this by prioritizing street projects with protected bike lanes,transit lanes, greenways, shared-use path,and lane elimination for complete street,traffic calming, and road diet types of improvements. Beautiful,walkable communities combine residential, retail, office, recreation and public transportation features to make community living easy. Enhanced bus services and light rail/streetcar extensions improve mobility and ease congestion. Even the smallest adjustments, like widening sidewalks and adding bikeways,can provide dramatic impact and add value to Beach resident's quality of life. Along with easing congestion and improving air quality,the benefits of enhancing public transit are enormous. Transit-oriented development increases property values, property tax revenues, sales tax revenues, and more. In short, a healthy transportation system can anchor a community's revitalization effort.When your public transit system serves a mix of residential and commercial uses,you'll help reduce vehicle trips and make residents less dependent on their cars. Imagine the positive impact on local traffic,the economy and air quality when facilities like libraries, hospitals, houses of worship and civic buildings are located near public transit stations. Build shops, offices,and residential dwellings close together, centered around attractive features such as planters, benches, fountains and public art. It's best to place parking facilities behind commercial developments rather than in the center of them. By doing so,you'll have developed an area that's walkable and inviting—villages where people want to spend time shopping, playing, living and working. Don't hide your facilities—design them as part of the community. Plant shrubs,trees and flowers, and then make sure they're well-maintained.And think about attractive lighting. It's as important for safety as it is for enhancing the character of your community.The more comfortable people are in your public transit facilities,the more often they'll use them. So ensure that they look great. Make your facilities easy to get to and easy to use. Keep them clean, safe and secure. Provide sidewalks and eliminate barriers. Lochner,though our extensive planning experience has identified 10 multimodal strategies to enhance communities: 1. Make Public Transportation a planning priority 2. Make Public Transportation the center of your community 3. Make Public Transportation attractive 4. Make Public Transportation easy street for pedestrians 5. Encourage the use of Public Transportation–incentivize it 6. Encourage local businesses to support Public Transportation 7. Incentivize living near Public Transportation facilities 2017-126-KB 17 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER 8. Make Public Transportation a canvas for new ideas 9. Make Public Transportation a community partner 10. Make Public Transportation an investment Transportation alternatives should ideally work in harmony and complement one another. Encouraging and facilitating public participation in major transportation decisions via pilot projects is a great way to engage the community and get buy-in for multimodal alternatives. Make sure that public transportation services are always part of the decision-making process. APPROACH TO PROJECT MANAGEMENT James Spinks III, PE, PTOE is our proposed Project Manager for this contract and is supported by an exceptional team of experts.When new tasks arise James holds an internal project kick-off meeting with the relevant task leaders to discuss each of the project objectives and ensure that the team has a firm understanding of the City's desired result. In the case of multiple concurrent tasks,James is assisted by each of the tasks leaders to ensure the successful and timely execution of the work. James has more than over 18 years of experience. His expertise is in traffic operations and safety,transportation planning, signal design, site planning,traffic impact analysis and ITS planning. He has worked on statewide transportation plans and plan components, such as Evaluation and Appraisal Reports(EAR), Evaluation and Appraisal Report(EAR)Based Amendments, and Comprehensive Plans where he has developed goals, objectives and policies for local and state government. He has served as Project Manager on similar projects within the Tri- County area as well as managed projects for the Florida Department of Transportation and has served as a City Traffic Engineering Consultant in more than 20 municipalities in South Florida.James will be the main point of contact between Lochner and the City of Miami Beach. James' management style can be best described as responsive,yet proactive,as he is always available to meet the clients demands,yet based on his municipal experience can anticipate issues before they happen and manage them before they arise.James is familiar with the role of being a Project Manager on municipal contracts through firsthand experience; understanding that he will need to be available not only during typical working hours(8 am to 5 pm), but also for night meetings, such as the, Commission Meetings, Special Commission meeting, Presentations &Awards, Planning Board, Design Review Board, Board of Adjustments, Historic Perseveration Board, Home Owner's Associations(HOAs),Transportation, Parking&Bicycle-Pedestrian Facilities Committee, community groups, Citizen's Forums and any others that may arise.James understands that the key to success on this contract is to constantly be available to help the City of Miami Beach meet the needs and demands of the Commission,the Manager and the residents.James has built a solid reputation on not only being there, but providing viable solutions to any challenges that arise at a moment's notice. James' Project Management approach has the following elements: 1. Our Team is comprised of the best professionals in their respective fields, allowing James to focus on managing the project and maintaining a high level of confidence with his team. 2. James recommends a scoping meeting prior to negotiation and conduct a kickoff meeting to ensure that the project moves in the right direction from the moment our Team is selected. 3. In any project assignment,James makes certain key stakeholders including the City of Coral Gables residents, businesses,and local governments have their issues addressed. 4. James ensures involvement by the technical staff early,often and for the duration of the project. 5. James monitors,direct and provide oversight of transportation planning,traffic engineering, and design activities through progress meetings and daily communication. 6. James coordinates project submittals, reviews, and resolution of comments. 7. James maintains the project schedule and budget control. 8. James assures high standards while monitoring implementation of the Quality Control Plan. 2017-126-KB 18 Tab 3 Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC HN ER A PROVEN PROCESS TO MEETING DEADLINES AND BUDGET Having served multiple municipal agencies on similar contracts, Lochner understands the difficulty of working within tight budgets and schedules. Project scopes, budgets, and schedules for each assignment will be coordinated with the City ahead of time to ensure critical deadlines are agreed upon,scheduled and ultimately met. If we do our job and look good,the City looks good! Lochner holds monthly progress meetings and submit progress reports to City informed throughout the life of the contract on all ongoing task work orders for the City's PM to approve, prior to billing.The schedule for the project progress meetings will be coordinated with the City's Project Manager and attendance of all key Lochner staff members will be mandatory. By requiring project progress meetings and reports, project cost control can be better maintained and tracked by the City's Project Manager and Lochner staff. As projects advance and new tasks begin, James has a task kick-off meeting with the City's Project Manager to discuss each of the projects objectives so that Lochner staff can have a firm understanding of the City's desired result.This proven process ensures that task work orders are being kept on schedule. Monthly progress reports will update percentages complete for each task,which will coincide with billing invoices percent complete,which will ensure that the City never pays for work that has not been completed. The project schedule and documents are stored in Lochner's Project Wise file sharing cloud based system for 24/7 easy accessibility for the City's Project Manager,which can be effortlessly utilized to verify if documents are completed and where they stand for each task work order. APPROACH TO COST CONTROL A detailed project cost estimate for each task assigned is quickly be developed and submitted to the City's Project Manager for approval. Once a consensus on the scope and fees has been achieved, Lochner staff are assigned and immediately begin working on the new project task. Our experience shows that this process eliminates project overruns and additional service agreements. APPROACH TO QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL Lochner is committed to helping the City achieve its key intended outcomes in the Strategic Plan and the goals of both the City of Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan and the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan. Since 1942, our success is directly related to our consistent delivery high quality, cost-feasible,transportation solutions that improve communities for the people. To maintain our quality,we have adopted a"bullet-proof"review technique that not only involves continuous peer review, but is certified by our independent quality control review board and Quality Control Officer for all deliverables.This technique involves milestone peer review checks,viable concept and evaluation screening to evaluate constructability and impacts(right of way, drainage, permits, utilities, environmental,etc.)by design staff, survey staff, and construction staff. Lochner makes viable recommendations consistent with the goals and objectives of the City of Miami Beach that provide an emphasis on mobility, economic vitality,and sustainability. The Lochner team for this contract was specifically selected to include levels of redundancy in regards to experience and knowledge to allow for the execution of multiple concurrent tasks and a thorough QA/QC process that involves independent peer reviews. The Lochner QA/QC certification,which ensures that we have followed our adopted process, is attached to all final documents. 2017-126-KB 19 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOC H N E R ABILITY TO PERFORM THE WORK Lochner's approach and ability to perform the work is based on a simple formula, providing a well-balanced, redundant team of technical experts with a proven history of providing quality products to support our strong, reputable and established Project Manager James Spinks. The Lochner Team members are committed to the City of Miami Beach and have proven it time-in-time again on similar contracts. The Lochner team's established base of current and previous clients includes, but is not limited to: • Florida Department of • Town of Miami Lakes • City of West Park Transportation (FDOT) • City of Sunny Isles Beach • City of Weston • Miami-Dade County TPO • Village of Miami Shores • City of Aventura • Broward MPO • Town of Cutler Bay • City of Fort Lauderdale • Palm Beach MPO • City of North Miami Beach • City of Green Acres • Martin County MPO • City of Doral • City of North Lauderdale • St. Lucie County MPO • Village of Palmetto Bay • SFRTA • City of Miami • City of Miami Beach • City of South Miami • City of Homestead AVAILABILITY OF KEY PERSONNEL Name Role Availability to Perform the Required Scope James Spinks III, PE, PTOE Project Manager Transportation Planning Task Leader 65% Traffic Engineering Task Leader Matthew Ridgway Smart Growth Task Leader 40-65% Jerry Walters Livable Cities Task Leader 40-65% Bill Howell, PE Complete Street Task Leader 40-65% Karen Kiselewski Integration of Transportation and Land Use 40-65% Task Leader Tom Lavash Economic and Financial Analysis Task Leader 40-65% Andrea Ostradka,AICP, LEED AP Transit Planning Task Leader 40-65% Charlie Alexander Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Task Leader 40-65% Alfredo Sanchez. AIA,AICP, Urban Design Task Leader 40-65% LEED AP Station Area Planning Task Leader Edwin Mojena, PE Roadway Design Task Leader 40-65% Randy Hollingworth Landscape Task Leader 40-65% Manny Vera, PSM Survey Task Leader 40-65% Magali Abad Public Involvement Task Leader 40-65% Robert Myers Environmental Task Leader 40-65% Raj Krishnasamy Geotechnical Task Leader 40-65% Sonia Shreffler-Bogart ITS Task Leader 40-65% Jim Corbett, CAPP Smart Parking Task Leader 40-65% Robert Ruano Grant Writing Task Leader 40-65% Glenn Davis Data Collection Task Leader 40-65% 2017-126-KB 110 Tab 3 I Approach and Methodology CITY OF MIAMI BEACH LOCHNER WHY THE LOCHNER TEAM IS SUCCESSFUL The Lochner Team's provides an approach that works. Staff has experience working similar projects, for similar municipal clients, in Miami-Dade County. Our team has experience representing municipalities, as well as, providing coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation and Miami-Dade Department of Public Works(DTPW). Our direct experience providing municipal services in Miami-Dade County is unparalleled and gives the Lochner Team a clear and distinct advantage over all other consultant teams for this contract. The Lochner Team assigned to this contract is composed of experts in all areas outlined in the scope of services, as well as, many others that can be offered to the City of Miami Beach.We have completed similar contracts successfully with highest degree of quality. The Lochner Team communicates and builds project consensus for the City of Miami Beach's projects and issues with the public and governmental agencies,whether they be simple or complex, and ensures that every one of the City's desires is met! 2017-126-KB 111