The URL can be used to link to this page

PSA with E Sciences, Inc. gel g— 302 71 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND E SCIENCES, INCORPORATED FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER FOR THE MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER, PURSUANT TO RFQ-2018-027-WG This Professional Services Agreement(Agreement) is entered into this ,„day of £1 ISG 2018, between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation org ized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139 (the City), and E Sciences Inc., a Florida Corporation whose address is 34 East Pine Street, Orlando, Florida 32801 (Consultant). SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS Agreement: This Agreement between the City and Consultant, including any exhibits and amendments thereto. City Manager: The chief administrative officer of the City. City Manager's Designee: The City staff member who is designated by the City Manager to administer this Agreement on behalf of the City. The City Manager's designee shall be the Elizabeth Wheaton, Department Director. Consultant: For the purposes of this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to be an independent contractor, and not an agent or employee of the City. Services: All services, work and actions by the Consultant performed or undertaken pursuant to the Agreement. Fee: Amount paid to the Consultant as compensation for Services. Proposal Documents: Proposal Documents shall mean City of Miami Beach RFQ No. 2018-027- WG for Geotechnical Engineering And Laboratory Testing Of Soil And Groundwater For The Miami Beach Convention Center, together with all amendments thereto, issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement RFQ and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), all of which are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the following order of precedent shall prevail: this Agreement; the RFQ; and the Proposal. Risk Manager: The Risk Manager of the City, with offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Third Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139; telephone number (305) 673-7000, Ext. 6435; and fax number (305) 673-7023. 1 SECTION 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 In consideration of the Fee to be paid to Consultant by the City, Consultant shall provide the work and services described in Exhibit"A" hereto (the Services). Although Consultant may be provided with a schedule of the available hours to provide its services, the City shall not control nor have the right to control the hours of the services performed by the Consultant; where the services are performed (although the City will provide Consultant with the appropriate location to perform the services); when the services are performed, including how many days a week the services are performed; how the services are performed, or any other aspect of the actual manner and means of accomplishing the services provided. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all services provided by the Consultant shall be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager. If there are any questions regarding the services to be performed, Consultant should contact the following person: Environment and Sustainability Department City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive, 1' Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 Attn: Margarita Wells (305) 673-7000 #6928 2.2 Consultant's Services, and any deliverables incident thereto, shall be completed in accordance with the timeline and/or schedule in Exhibit "A" hereto. SECTION 3 TERM 3.1 It is understood that, consistent with standard professional care required by this agreement, time is of the essence in the completion of the project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 3.2 The term of this Agreement (Term) shall commence upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, and shall remain in effect until such time as the awarded firm delivers to the City an environmental assessment of the property for the City to reach regulatory closure for the property and receive final Miami Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) approval. 3.3 The Consultant shall perform the services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this agreement, and the orderly progress of work. Notwithstanding the Term provided herein, Consultant shall adhere to any specific timelines, schedules, dates, and/or performance milestones for completion and delivery of the Services, as same is/are set forth in the timeline and/or schedule referenced in Exhibit A hereto. 2 SECTION 4 FEE 4.1 Consultant shall be paid for actual services performed in accordance with the attached Exhibit "B", Schedule of Fees and Applicable Rates. In consideration of the Services to be provided, Consultant shall be compensated on a "Not to Exceed" basis determined by the hourly rates established in Schedule "B" of this agreement. Except as to any services and compensation authorized pursuant to this agreement, any additional services shall be subject to funding availability, if approved through the City's budgeting process. 4.2 Fees will be paid consistent with progress made at each of the project phases, as described in Exhibit B of this agreement. 4.3 INVOICING Upon receipt of an acceptable and approved invoice, payment(s) shall be made within forty-five (45) days for that portion (or those portions) of the Services satisfactorily rendered (and referenced in the particular invoice). Invoices shall include a detailed description of the Services (or portions thereof) provided, and shall be submitted to the City at the following address: Accounts Payable Division Finance Department City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 SECTION 5 TERMINATION 5.1 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE If the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner, or otherwise violates, any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations material to this Agreement, the City, through its City Manager, shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement for cause. Prior to exercising its option to terminate for cause, the City shall notify the Consultant of its violation of the particular term(s) of this Agreement, and shall grant Consultant ten (10) days to cure such default. If such default remains uncured after ten (10) days, the City may terminate this Agreement without further notice to Consultant. Upon termination, the City shall be fully discharged from any and all liabilities, duties, and terms arising out of, or by virtue of, this Agreement. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by any breach of the Agreement by the Consultant. The City, at its sole option and discretion, shall be entitled to bring any and all legal/equitable actions that it deems to be in its best interest in order to enforce the City's right and remedies against Consultant. The City shall be entitled to recover all costs of such actions, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 3 5.2 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY THE CITY MAY ALSO, THROUGH ITS CITY MANAGER, AND FOR ITS CONVENIENCE AND WITHOUT CAUSE, TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT AT ANY TIME DURING THE TERM BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE TO CONSULTANT OF SUCH TERMINATION; WHICH SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING RECEIPT BY THE CONSULTANT OF SUCH NOTICE. ADDITIONALLY, IN THE EVENT OF A PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR SAFETY CONCERN, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY MANAGER, IN THE CITY MANAGER'S SOLE DISCRETION, THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO A VERBAL OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CONTRACTOR, MAY IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT FOR A TIME CERTAIN, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT ON A GIVEN DATE. IF THE AGREEMENT IS TERMINATED FOR CONVENIENCE BY THE CITY, CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID FOR ANY SERVICES SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION; FOLLOWING WHICH THE CITY SHALL BE DISCHARGED FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, DUTIES, AND TERMS ARISING OUT OF, OR BY VIRTUE OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 5.3 TERMINATION FOR INSOLVENCY The City also reserves the right to terminate the Agreement in the event the Consultant is placed either in voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. In such event, the right and obligations for the parties shall be the same as provided for in Section 5.2. SECTION 6 INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Miami Beach and its officers, employees, agents, and contractors, from and against any and all actions (whether at law or in equity), claims, liabilities, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and costs, for personal, economic or bodily injury, wrongful death, loss of or damage to property, which may arise or be alleged to have arisen from the negligent acts, errors, omissions or other wrongful conduct of the Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or any other person or entity acting under Consultant's control or supervision, in connection with, related to, or as a result of the Consultant's performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement. To that extent, the Consultant shall pay all such claims and losses and shall pay all such costs and judgments which may issue from any lawsuit arising from such claims and losses, and shall pay all costs and attorneys' fees expended by the City in the defense of such claims and losses, including appeals. The Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the Consultant shall in no way limit the Consultant's responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. 4 The parties agree that one percent (1%) of the total compensation to Consultant for performance of the Services under this Agreement is the specific consideration from the City to the Consultant for the Consultant's indemnity agreement. The provisions of this Section 6.1 and of this indemnification shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. 6.2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS [NOTE: INSURANCE TYPES AND LIMITS BELOW SHOULD ALWAYS BE SAME AS WHAT WAS SPECIFICED IN BID DOCUMENTS] The Consultant shall maintain and carry in full force during the Term, the following insurance: 1. Consultant General Liability, in the amount of$1,000,000; 2. Automobile Liability Insurance Covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000ombined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Consultant Professional Liability, in the amount of$2,000,000; and 4. Workers Compensation & Employers Liability, as required pursuant to Florida Statutes. The insurance must be furnished by insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida. All insurance policies must be issued by companies rated no less than "B+" as to management and not less than "Class VI" as to strength by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey, or its equivalent. All of Consultant's certificates shall contain endorsements providing that written notice shall be given to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction in coverage in the policy. The insurance certificates for General Liability shall include the City as an additional insured and shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement. Original certificates of insurance must be submitted to the City's Risk Manager for approval (prior to any work and/or services commencing) and will be kept on file in the Office of the Risk Manager. The City shall have the right to obtain from the Consultant specimen copies of the insurance policies in the event that submitted certificates of insurance are inadequate to ascertain compliance with required coverage. The Consultant is also solely responsible for obtaining and submitting all insurance certificates for any sub-consultants. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the Consultant of the liabilities and obligations under this Section or under any other portion of this Agreement. The Consultant shall not commence any work and or services pursuant to this Agreement until all insurance required under this Section has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City's Risk Manager. SECTION 7 LITIGATION JURISDICTIONIVENUE/JURY TRIAL WAIVER This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. This Agreement shall be enforceable in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and if legal action is necessary by either party with respect to the enforcement of any or all of the terms or conditions herein, exclusive venue for the enforcement of same shall lie in Miami-Dade County, Florida. By 5 entering into this Agreement, Consultant and the City expressly waive any rights either party may have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement. SECTION 8 LIMITATION OF CITY'S LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on the City's liability for any cause of action, for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the sum of $10,000. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damage action for breach of contract to be limited to a maximum amount of$10,000. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to the Consultant for damages in an amount in excess of $10,000 for any action or claim for breach of contract arising out of the performance or non-performance of any obligations imposed upon the City by this Agreement. Nothing contained in this section or elsewhere in this Agreement is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon the City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. SECTION 9 DUTY OF CARE/COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS/PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; AND CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS 9.1 DUTY OF CARE With respect to the performance of the work and/or service contemplated herein, Consultant shall exercise that degree of skill, care, efficiency and diligence normally exercised by reasonable persons and/or recognized professionals with respect to the performance of comparable work and/or services. 9.2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS In its performance of the work and/or services, Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations of the City, Miami-Dade County, the State of Florida, and the federal government, as applicable. 9.3 PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS Any work product arising out of this Agreement, as well as all information specifications, processes, data and findings, are intended to be the property of the City and shall not otherwise be made public and/or disseminated by Consultant, without the prior written consent of the City Manager, excepting any information, records etc. which are required to be disclosed pursuant to 6 Court Order and/or Florida Public Records Law. All reports, documents, articles, devices, and/or work produced in whole or in part under this Agreement are intended to be the sole and exclusive property of the City, and shall not be subject to any application for copyright or patent by or on behalf of the Consultant or its employees or sub-consultants, without the prior written consent of the City Manager. SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 AUDIT AND INSPECTIONS Upon reasonable verbal or written notice to Consultant, and at any time during normal business hours (i.e. 9AM — 5PM, Monday through Fridays, excluding nationally recognized holidays), and as often as the City Manager may, in his/her reasonable discretion and judgment, deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City Manager, and/or such representatives as the City Manager may deem to act on the City's behalf, to audit, examine, and/ or inspect, any and all other documents and/or records relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all such records at its place of business at the address set forth in the "Notices" section of this Agreement. 10.2 [INTENTIONALLY DELETETD] 10.3 ASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER OR SUBCONSULTING Consultant shall not subcontract, assign, or transfer all or any portion of any work and/or service under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Manager, which consent, if given at all, shall be in the Manager's sole judgment and discretion. Neither this Agreement, nor any term or provision hereof, or right hereunder, shall be assignable unless as approved pursuant to this Section, and any attempt to make such assignment (unless approved) shall be void. 10.4 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES Prior to commencement of the Services, the Consultant shall file a State of Florida Form PUR 7068, Sworn Statement under Section 287.133(3)(a) Florida Statute on Public Entity Crimes with the City's Procurement Division. 10.5 NO DISCRIMINATION In connection with the performance of the Services, the Consultant shall not exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status. 7 Additionally, Consultant shall comply fully with the City of Miami Beach Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, as may be amended from time to time, prohibiting discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and public services on account of actual or perceived race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, age, disability, ancestry, height, weight, domestic partner status, labor organization membership, familial situation, or political affiliation. 10.6 CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant herein agrees to adhere to and be governed by all applicable Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest Ordinances and Ethics provisions, as set forth in the Miami-Dade County Code, as may be amended from time to time; and by the City of Miami Beach Charter and Code, as may be amended from time to time; both of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which could conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not employ any person having any such interest. No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this Agreement or to any benefits arising therefrom. 10.7 CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW (A) Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time. (B) The term "public records" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011(12), which means all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. (C) Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes, if the Consultant meets the definition of"Contractor" as defined in Section 119.0701(1)(a), the Consultant shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (2) Upon request from the City's custodian of public records, provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed, except as authorized by law, for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (4) Upon completion of the Agreement, transfer, at no cost to the City, all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service. If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Consultant keeps and 8 maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the City, upon request from the City's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. (D) REQUEST FOR RECORDS; NONCOMPLIANCE. (1) A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City. If the City does not possess the requested records, the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request, and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time. (2) Consultant's failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement, and the City, at its sole discretion, may: (1) unilaterally terminate the Agreement; (2) avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement; and/or(3)avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. (3) A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s. 119.10. (E) CIVIL ACTION. (1) If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records relating to the City's contract for services, the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees, if: a. The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time; and b. At least 8 business days before filing the action, the plaintiff provided written notice of the public records request, including a statement that the Consultant has not complied with the request, to the City and to the Consultant. (2) A notice complies with subparagraph (1)(b) if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent. Such notices must be sent by common carrier delivery service or by registered, Global Express Guaranteed, or certified mail, with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery, which may be in an electronic format. (3) A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. (F) IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: 9 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION: RAFAEL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 E-MAIL: RAFAELGRANADO(a.MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE: 305-673-7411 SECTION 11 NOTICES All notices and communications in writing required or permitted hereunder, shall be delivered personally to the representatives of the Consultant and the City listed below or may be mailed by U.S. Certified Mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service. Until changed by notice, in writing, all such notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: TO CONSULTANT: E Sciences, Incorporated 34 E Pine Street Orlando Florida 32801 Attn: Peter K. Partlow, PE With Copy to: E Sciences, Incorporated 224 SE 9th Street Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 Attn: Nadia Locke, PE TO CITY: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Fl 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With Copy to: Environment and Sustainability Department City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive, 15' Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 Attn: Margarita Wells 10 Notice may also be provided to any other address designated by the party to receive notice if such alternate address is provided via U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivered, or by overnight delivery. In the event an alternate notice address is properly provided, notice shall be sent to such alternate address in addition to any other address which notice would otherwise be sent, unless other delivery instruction as specifically provided for by the party entitled to notice. Notice shall be deemed given on the date of an acknowledged receipt, or, in all other cases, on the date of receipt or refusal. 11 SECTION 12 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 12.1 CHANGES AND ADDITIONS This Agreement cannot be modified or amended without the express written consent of the parties. No modification, amendment, or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 12.2 SEVERABILITY If any term or provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 12.3 ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT The City and Consultant agree that this is the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Title and paragraph headings are for convenient reference and are not intended to confer any rights or obligations upon the parties to this Agreement. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first entered above. FOR CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA ATTEST: Alir By: �% v.. Ci Clerk City ;v %1 ?........% C°Ny1 /.fi Date: t" 36) Lely • 0Z/• Z.' .. {C $ `:.\KGB? 7-7 OPATE0: FOR CONSULTANT: E SCIS • yn^••parCO r D 11 ATTEST: Mea-eucttidri&kc.�0�Fiti )-er Print Name and Titley„j1,,,�s-h.+ ✓ Print Name and Title Date: Q f Il Ifs APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE • &FOR EXECUTION oar tic4 City Attorney ,n ap Date F: ATTO/TORG/Agreemcros/Professional Services Agreement 2017 modified 12-19-2017 I V 0 13 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1-Assessment Approach and Regulatory Coordination E Sciences will present the initial site assessment approach to DERM representatives to seek their verbal input during a meeting at their offices. E Sciences will review historical site information, historical test data and regulatory records and develop maps depicting historical assessments and the proposed assessment approach as exhibits to facilitate the discussion. Meeting minutes will be prepared to document the discussions and outcomes from the meeting with DERM. The initial assessment approach will be modified to incorporate DERM and the City's input and a sampling plan document will be prepared. The Sampling Plan will outline the general assessment approach, sample locations, parameters to be tested, and anticipated regulatory deliverables. The document will be submitted to the City for initial review, if desired,and to DERM for their official review and comment of the assessment approach. As part of this task, E Sciences will also explore the possibility of DERM's approval of a generic dewatering plan that would suffice for projects located within 500 feet of the former golf course or contaminated groundwater. E Sciences will present this approach during the meeting for their consideration. Under this task, E Sciences will assist the City with developing a restrictive covenant for the required properties so that conditional regulatory closure may be sought. Likely conditions would be restrictions on land use to commercial/government use and on groundwater use. E Sciences will prepare the documentation for the City's review, modification and input. E Sciences will also assist the City with modifying the documentation as required during the negotiation between DERM and the City. Note that this supporting documentation may include topographic and boundary survey; it is anticipated that the City will be able to provide the survey documentation as needed. This task also includes time for a second follow up meeting with DERM and up to three meetings or conference calls with the City. Task 2-Field and Laboratory Assessment Activities E Sciences proposes to limit the assessment activities to evaluate boundary conditions and define areas of contamination that have been previously assessed and determined to have arsenic above regulatory standards. This approach is based on demonstrating the limits of the former golf course based on historical plat maps and aerial photographs. The following scope of services was designed based upon this approach: • E Sciences will clear underground utilities by contacting Sunshine One Utility Locations prior to each drilling event. We will develop a health and safety plan in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. • E Sciences proposes to conduct up to 105 soil borings. We anticipate these soil borings will be advanced within the Hotel Property, the Botanical Gardens, Site A. Most of these soil borings are located on Site A based upon input from our meeting with the City that the soils in this area should be assessed because it is undergoing reconstruction. The other soil borings are being collected in an attempt to delineate boundary conditions. This soil boring estimate incorporates conducting a composite sampling protocol, to be approved by DERM, for Site A and the Botanical Gardens. Soil samples will be collected from depth intervals of 0-6 inches and 6-24 inches. Up to 60 soil samples will be placed in clean, laboratory-supplied jars for transport to a 14 state-certified NELAC approved laboratory for arsenic analysis. An iterative process of analysis is anticipated. With this approach, we would analyze the soil samples collected from the 0-6 inch interval to evaluate the need for analysis of samples collected from the deeper interval. Additional soil samples would then be analyzed on an iterative basis stepping away from soil boring locations that demonstrate exceedances of arsenic. • E Sciences will install up to 10 groundwater monitoring wells using direct push technology. Groundwater samples will be collected using the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). We will analyze up to 10 samples for arsenic. Task 3-Regulatory Reporting and Coordination E Sciences will prepare a Site Assessment Report documenting the activities completed, the laboratory analytical results, conclusions and recommendations, as appropriate. This report will include background information, historical assessment data, representative figures and analytical summary tables. E Sciences has included time to prepare up to three additional reports or responses to requests for additional information in anticipation additional reporting or clarification requests from DERM. Draft copies of reports will be submitted to the City for review and comment prior to final submittal to DERM. Once the assessment is complete, E Sciences will prepare a soil management plan and health and safety plan that could be used for future construction that would disturb soils within the footprint of the contaminated area and within the boundary of the former golf course. E Sciences will use the soil management plan prepared by Kimley Horn and Associates as a basis as it has been approved by DERM. Amending this existing document that was developed for the convention center renovation and approved by DERM is an approach being employed to expedite the review process and keep costs down on the project. In lieu of active remediation, the plan would incorporate provisions for future capital improvement projects will be developed to ensure that whether excavation work in areas of contamination is being conducted by City staff or contractors, general, but clear, instruction on management of hazards, soil segregation, handling, stockpiling and disposal requirements will be in place. Task 4-Generic Dewatering Plan If DERM approves the concept, a generic dewatering plan would be developed for projects within 500 to 1,000 feet of the groundwater contamination. Having this generic permit would ease the burden on contractors and consultants when they have known dewatering projects in the vicinity. Contractors may still need to submit a dewatering plan and reference the work in this generic plan along with the site- specific factors but this should streamline the permitting process. Task 5-Engineering Control and Maintenance Plan In lieu of active remediation, E Sciences will develop an Engineering Control and Maintenance Plan for areas where potential exposure to contamination are of concern. It is possible that installation of the engineering controls may require some source removal so provisions for this will also be dictated as part of this plan. Should groundwater impacts be observed to have migrated off City-owned property, then more proactive remedial measures may be necessary. But based upon the results of the assessment thus far, it is the opinion of E Sciences that it is reasonable to expect that groundwater impacts are localized within City- owned land. Contingency Scope As presented under Task 1 above, the scope proposed under Task 1 through Task 5 is based on limited assessment information and is subject to review and comment from DERM and the need for delineation of potentially unrevealed areas of contamination. It is probable that DERM will require additional testing be conducted or that the results of the initial tasks proposed will trigger the need for additional or 15 confirmation testing. Note that DERM had previously requested that the analytical scope for Site B include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPII), volatile organic aromatic compounds (VOAs), RCRA metals and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), as well as nitrites and nitrates. To address this, E Sciences has developed unit rates for additional assessment and reporting efforts. E SCIENCES ASSUMPTIONS Please note that our proposal is based upon the following assumptions: • Because a broad suite of parameters was tested, we intend to propose to limit the assessment to arsenic and nitrates. We note that this approach to limit these parameters is subject to DERM's review and approval. We note that DERM had previously requested that the analytical scope for Site B include PAH,TRPH, VOAs, RCRA metals and PCBs, as well as nitrites and nitrates. • We understand that the City is pursuing Brownfields designation and a Brownfields Site Rehabilitation Agreement for this property. Until the BSRA is executed, DERM will utilize Chapter 24 of the Miami-Dade Code of Ordinances as the governing regulatory rule for this project. This code has been used as a basis for the scope presented herein. The scope may be modified later if the state codes applies at a later date. Our approach also includes limiting the assessment initially to the footprint of the golf course property and expanding to other City-owned properties as necessary. We do not intend to sample on private property at this time and this has not been included in the scope of this assessment. • The City will provide access to City-owned properties, utility locations and information requested. • If source removal of installation of engineering controls are necessary, this will be conducted under a separate scope of work as this would require obtaining bids from contractors at that time. SCHEDULE The City anticipates that construction activities that affect the subject properties will begin in October 2018. As such, E Sciences will coordinate the work with the City to expedite assessment and results on those areas where construction is proposed. E Sciences anticipates completion of the initial site assessment outlined herein within six months of notice to proceed. This schedule is subject to change based regulatory review schedule and coordination. The schedule for the remaining tasks will be dependent up on the results of the assessment, as well as the City's input and needs. 16 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF FEES AND APPLICABLE RATES E Sciences will complete tasks 1 through 5 outlined above in accord with the unit costs listed on the cost estimating spreadsheet attached, in an amount not to exceed(NTE) 5150,747.50*. An additional amount of$46,730.00 will be allocated by the City for contingency items. *The City will only be invoiced for actual services performed in accordance with the attached schedule of fees at the applicable rates. If unforeseen conditions should require services beyond the scope of services described herein or should the City request additional consulting services, E Sciences will notify the City of additional costs necessary to complete the project,prior to proceeding. Please refer to the contingency unit rates outlined in the cost estimating spreadsheet attached. 17 4 § §§4 Mil §§§ § 1 H • h § | aJ§ § (110)} ) §/| § j & \\§ g. | l' il I !' _!| ` | l li | | )\ ] je | / , ) � � l \{ / | \ | ] hi ) ` § - 1 |o || | ! \ } } 1 | ! | I r I 1 i ! |! ' I . . . Na | / _ .... . .... ... . . ( § § /\) §\ \ - - - - „;.. ,~ ! I , al. , § 4§ *; ... .. ....... ..... 0. -| IiIM . I )]§ . . ,; fl ' , � i i go; R , / •; { asci | § y w e, � w, . e g _ . . .. - - 6.10 \ \ 31 P. . ... .. ... .. .. .... .. ,. | ! #Q40 ) 888 888 |;|g ! ` ; i , . ., ;.-wCoj) \ /§ Q# , Re4 e o. e e, aae: eas e . rr E EL I 1 Iiiiiiiii 4.11 I il •4. PPR pLillil ill !! I P1119011! IVII'll'k I�IIIIIWI IIIUf 111IIIIIIIIIIIIIr AIIIIIII�!IE tI 11110IIIIIP101111IIIIIIIIIIIIIC IPPIIIPI 111 t1t�RI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrunI1111IIIIII11r AIII!llllilur y 1 t t°t IIRIPI TPII!IIIIIFIIIIIIPIIIIE iIIIIIIIIIIG 1I1 g 1111 n111111IIIIII111IIIIr1III1IIl1IIIIII'I'lrrr AIIIIIIII11r 4 9 IIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIII!IiIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIr Ipai u li IIIIIIAIIRIIIIIIIIIDI!IPIIIIRIIIIIIG AIIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRr111111I11IIIIII11r ullllll111E ttr !IIIA!I!IIIIIIIIIIIIDI:IIIIIIIIIIIIIII6 AIIIIIIIIIII Iii IIIIIIIIIil.II111ll1Ir11111II11III'ul r 1101101011111? . !I!!I!I!00100II11111GIIII!I1II!IIIHII� ! 1119!I!!I1 f'' nIIIA1p1IIIl111III1rliiiiuuiiUHIIIIr AIIIIIIIIIIE . IAIPPA!!!!!II!IIIIIPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG "TR Di IIIIIIIllulIllIIIIIr1111IIuIIIIIuIIr AIIIIIIIUTA .ifillIPMPENINE Mt li IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrI111III11II1IIIllr AIIIIIIIIIIE IIIIIIIIII!!!IIPIIEIIIIIIIIIIRIIIIILIMUT: 1'! IIIIIIIIIIIIIl111!IIIr1111IIIIlllllllllr AllllllllllE !III !III!III!IIIIIII!IIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIII AIIIIIIIIIII Pip IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIEEr1111III11l!!!IIIb Al1IIIll'11E r IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'IIIIIPIIIIIIIRIIIIIE IIIIIIIIIIIL 11 n111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIrIIIIIuIIi lllPIIr AIIIIIII!IIE ui IIIIFILIIIIIIIII!IIIIDPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG 'iIIRIIIIIIG '111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllrllnlllilllllllilr AIuuiIIm1Ir" r IP!IIIIIA!((P!IIIIDPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iIII'IIIIII€ q IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrlllllllnlllllilir AIIIIIIIIIIE (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII3iIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� iIIIIIIIIIII I 11111111IIIIII111IIIErnn11110IIIIIIr AIIIIIIIIIIE (P!III(IIIIIII=.IIIIDPIPPIIIIIIIIIIL iI!!!IIIIIII ! ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION COMMISSION ITEMS AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM RESOLUTION NO. 201830271 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2018.027-WG, FOR GEOTECHNICAL . ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH E SCIENCES, INC., AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH E SCIENCES, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS W ITHTANGAN'ENGINEERING'ANITE NVI RON M ENTACSE RVICES,TI NC—AS-THE-SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GLE ASSOCIATES, INC., AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER • AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on December 13, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2018-027-WG for Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the City of Miami Beach Convention Center; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2018, the RFQ 2018-027-WG for Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the City of Miami Beach Convention Center(the RFQ")was Issued; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2018, the City received statements of qualifications from • five(5)firms: Absolute Civil Engineering Solutions, LLC, E Sciences, Inc., GLE Associates, Inc. Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. and Professional Service Industries, Inc.;and WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager pursuant to LTC# 052-2018 convened on March 20, 2018, to consider the responsive proposals received; and WHEREAS,the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as follows: E Sciences, Inc., as the top ranked proposer, Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; GLE Associates, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; Professional Service Industries, Inc., as the forth ranked proposer; and Absolute Civil Engineering Solutions, LLC; and SII WHEREAS, after reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and is recommending that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations with E Sciences, Inc., as the top ranked proposer; and if unsuccessful in negotiating an agreement with E Sciences, Inc.; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Langan Engineering and Environmental Services Inc., as the second ranked proposer; and if unsuccessful in negotiating an agreement with Langan Engineering and Environmental Services Inc.; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GLE Associates, Inc., as the third ranked proposer;and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY 'COMMISSION-OF-THE—CITY-OF-MIAMI"BEACH; FLURIDA;therth€Mayor and-city Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 2018-027-WG, for Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with E Sciences, Inc., as the top ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with E Sciences, Inc.; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Langan Engineering and Environmental Services Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Langan Engineering and Environmental Services Inc.; authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with GLE Associates, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this // day of 2018. ATTEST: R7�FA E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK DAN GELB , MA OR 1j T'WGENOA�201a\04 ApnI\ProcuremeMlRF• .Gaol•.p' �1• neetlng and Lab Testing'RF02018-02]-W6 RESO,tloc """")( Ilii • *`INCORPORATED£ *E APPROVED AS TO 111 FORM&LANGUAGE ,(•� :`•F.OZI 41 &FOR EXECUTION city maw/ RAg lit. Resolutions - C7 AB MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: April 11, 2018 SUBJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2018-027-WG, FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH E SCIENCES, INC., AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH E SCIENCES, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH LANGAN • ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GLE ASSOCIATES, • INC., AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE • MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS In December 2014, the City conducted a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment as part of the Miami Beach Convention Center Renovation Project. The results documented in Phase II report indicated that a large portion of the project site formerly operated as a golf course and that arsenic levels in the soil exceeded residential cleanup target levels. Groundwater sampling results indicated that two out of three wells are contaminated with Nitrates, while one well is contaminated with Arsenic and Antimony. While arsenic in the soil was the only contaminant of concern reported above the regulatory limit, the Environmental Site Assessment also included sampling for lead, organochlorine pesticides, and organophosphate pesticides. Miami Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) also requires testing for ammonia, nitrites, nitrates, the 8 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Volatile Organic Hydrocarbons (VOH)and Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCB)to be sampled to obtain site closure. The Environment and Sustainability Department is interested in seeking proposals from Consultants 755 to initiate a Site Assessment Report that builds on the existing environmental site assessments previously conducted for the Miami Beach Convention Center Renovation Project, and that assesses and delineates contamination in the soil and groundwater beyond the limits of development. This Site Assessment Report must be initiated prior to completing site development activities. The successful bidder shall also prepare a remediation and /or monitoring plan for the property, oversee the implementation of the remediation and/or monitoring plans, and other related task as needed to obtain a determination of"No Further Action" RFQ PROCESS On December 13, 2017, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2018-027-WG for Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the City of Miami Beach Convention Center. RFQ responses were due and received on February 16, 2018. The Procurement Department issued solicitation notices to 1355. 69 prospective proposers accessed the advertised solicitation. The City received proposals from the following five(5)firms: Absolute Civil Engineering Solutions, LLC, E Sciences, Inc., GLE Associates, Inc. Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. and Professional Service Industries, Inc. • The Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager pursuant to LTC#052-2018 convened on March 20, 2018, to consider the responsive proposals received. The Committee comprised of • Margarita Wells, Assistant Director, Environmental and Sustainability Department, City of Miami • Beach, Jay Fink, Assistant Director, Public Works Department, City of Miami Beach and Jose Del Risco,Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Department, City of Miami Beach. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A, in the following order: 1st E Sciences, Inc. 2nd Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. 3rd GLE Associates, Inc. 4th Professional Service Industries, Inc. 5th Absolute Civil Engineering Solutions, LLC Following are summaries of the three top-ranked firms, as provided in each firm's proposal. E Sciences Inc— E Sciences' senior staff has worked in Miami Beach since the initial stages of the renaissance of South Beach and they provided environmental engineering and science services directly for through an existing continuing services agreement since 2011. One of its projects was the Phase I and II ESAs for this same project. Its project manager brings over 29 years of proven expertise and understanding of South Florida's regional environmental challenges and opportunities, as well as extensive experience in managing municipal and contamination projects, including intimate familiarity with this project. J angan F gineering and Environmental Services Inc Langan's South Florida operations were founded in 1974. Today, it has offices in Miami Lakes, Fort Lauderdale, and Tampa. The Langan Florida team is comprised of more than 40 technical 756 professionals providing environmental, geotechnical, and site/civil engineering services across the region. Langan's commitment to technical excellence, practical experience, and client responsiveness is demonstrated by their firm's 44-year history in South Florida. Its team of experts has worked on thousands of projects throughout Florida including Miami Beach. In addition to the local expertise and regional knowledge that is vital to project success, Langan provides clients with the depth and breadth of experience of a nationwide network of more than 1,000 professionals. SI F Associates Inc GLE has been in business for 28 years. Having worked side-by-side with both public and private clients, including over 110 different nwlti-facility governmental entities, over 55 public housing authorities, and 60 educational clients throughout the nation, GLE has specifically structured their firm to execute projects for public sector clients, and it is qualified to meet wide-ranging environmental needs. Through high-quality, professional and timely client service, GLE consistently completes projects on time,within budget and without surprises, and Its success Is proven through a high rate of repeat contracts. • • GLE has assembled a team that will address each major area of the scope noted with the RFQ. Joining the team is Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (AEL)for laboratory testing services. CONCLUSION After reviewing all of the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, I find that E Sciences, Inc. provided the best overall proposal with superior qualifications, technical approach, and prior performance. Some of the highlights of the proposal and oral presentation submitted by E Sciences, Inc., as articulated by the Evaluation Committee, include: • E Sciences, Inc. offered a Team that has first-hand knowledge of the City. • E Sciences, Inc. is well qualified and has positive experiences cooperating with regulatory agencies. • Additionally, E Sciences, Inc. presented by way of previous experience alternative methods that may expedite completion of the project. For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with E Sciences, Inc., as the top ranked proposer, and if unsuccessful In negotiating an agreement with E Sciences, Inc.; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; and if unsuccessful in negotiating an agreement with Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GLE Associates, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Ensure Compliance With Code Within Reasonable Time Frame, Emphasizing The Code For Commercial Development FINANCIAL INFORMATION. Grant Funding will not be utilized for this project. Legislative Tracking Environment and Sustainability/Procurement 757 ATTACHMENTS; Description o Attachment A: Evaluation Committee Ranking ❑ Resolution 758 6unjuea )n r N m R a 00 a � 0 J 6uljuea V N A t y O 9 O) Cr ` ff) O O W 2 6ullueeJ to N N C C LL LO CO N N N- CO O) O) O) W A rn 6W�uea O NV n O U N M Lo LO O 0 CO „ 0) CO N- N N) O .0 C C 0CO CO CY m Co. 0 t cal a) yA C O) 0 N O y C U y N v 47, C C U c'.) . ).- € y w cri In N d > N N . OTo o C > C «p UJ GI ° 3 U U a o aE c o O a N 00 W E R O . C N C C co C7 J Oi O U Q W.O'- w C7 0) UctJ c > o Q J W ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) AND ADDENDUMS • MIAMI BEACH • City of Miami Beach,1755 Meridian Avenue,3'0 Floor, Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.mlemlbeachf.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:398-873-7490. •• ADDENDUM NO. 4 RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center February 5, 2018 • This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from • prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. I. REVISIONS • 1. DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 P.M., on Friday, February 16, 2018, at the following location. City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. 2. Revise Appendix C, Paragraph C2 Statement of Work as follows: The Consultant shall provide, Environmental Engineering, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal Permitting, Department of Environmental • Resource Management Permitting, and construction costs estimating and • geotechnical services for the Project. The work shall include, but not be limited to, geotechnical, environmental assessment with a deliverable schedule that is comprised of the submittal of draft reports and final reports, deliverables-at--30%, eo ..o, _ -. . __ - -_ _• ._-., estimates of probable remediation cost at each stage of development, (including 100%), presentation materials to include renderings for regulatory agency(s) review, remediation documents, permitting, bidding/award, and construction administration services for the Project. II. ATTACHMENTS EXHIBIT A Pre-Proposal Conference Sign In Sheet EXHIBIT B Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) EXHIBIT C Sample Agreement 1 III. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED Q1) On Page 27 of the RFQ, it states that the services will include a Phase I and Phase II ESA. Is this required? Al) A Phase I and Phase II assessment has already been completed for sites A and B and will not be required as part of this project. The scope of services includes completing of a Site Assessment Report for Sites A and B, including assessing boundary conditions and, as applicable, off-site. Q2) In the event that the contamination is found to spread off site towards property owned by other entities, is it the responsibility of the awarded contractor to prepare the off-site notification package or will the City retain that responsibility? A2) In the instance that the contamination spreads toward private property and off-site notification is required, the City will be responsible for preparing and delivering • the off-site notification package with the technical guidance and input of the selected proposer. Q3) The RFQ package refers to sites A and B. Which are they and can a figure which designates the different sites be provided? A3) Yes, please refer to Exhibit B attached for Phase II ESA provided by E-Sciences that includes the maps of sites A and B. Q4) Can you confirm/clarify that there are no geotechnical efforts associated with this RFQ? A4) Geotechnical efforts are associated with this RFQ as needed to assess the extent • • of contamination in the soil or groundwater. Q5) May respondents use the City's logo in the submittal responses? A5) Yes. Q6) Who will be on the evaluation committee? A6) The Evaluation Committee has not yet been selected. Q7) Is a sample contract available for review? A7) Yes. Please refer to Exhibit C for Sample Agreement. Q8) Can you please provide a copy of the pre-bid meeting attendance sheet? A8) Yes. Please refer to Exhibit A attached. Q9) What is the anticipated Geotechnical scope, if any? A9) Please refer to response to Question#4 above. Q10) The Limited Assessment Report and DERM letter provided with the RFQ appear to discuss different areas within the Convention Center re-development. Additionally, DERM's online environmental records contain additional reports (example: Limited Groundwater Assessment Report in Support of Dewatering Activities dated 26 February 2016 by Geosytnec) indicating contamination elsewhere on the Convention Center property. Can you please clarify the areas of the convention center and contaminants that will fall under this RFQ? A10) The areas covered under this RFQ are sites A and B referenced in the RFQ package and shown in the map included as part of Exhibit B attached. Prospective 2 bidders should review the Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, draft Limited Site Assessment Report and other documents available in the online DERM database for the details on the contaminants of concern previously documented in the soil and/or groundwater of both these sites. Q11) The DERM letter provided with the RFQ, dated 5 November 2015, discusses the need for Soil Management, HASP, Air Monitoring and Engineering Controls. Will the preparation of these documents, or updates to current documents, be included as part of this RFQ? All) The firm who is awarded any remediation work resulting from the site assessment will be responsible for designing any Engineering Controls required to obtain a Site Rehabilitation Order and in preparing the associated Soil Management Plan, HASP, and Air Monitoring with the technical guidance and input of the selected proposer. Q12) The DERM letter dated 5 November 2015 mentions Sites A & B. Can you please provide a map the locations of each site? Al2) Yes, please refer to Exhibit B attached for Phase II ESA provided by E-Sciences that includes the maps of sites A and B. Q13) Page 26 of the RFQ indicates utility coordination and work will be required. Can you please clarify if any utility work is anticipated? • A13) No utility work is anticipated. Utility locates and coordination will be required to avoid potential impacts to underground utilities prior to drilling or other subsurface excavation required for the assessment work. Q14) Page 26, Section C2, discusses deliverables at 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% of the • development stages. This is typical of a construction project, and not environmental consulting. Will the city consider a deliverable schedule such as the submittal of field documentation, laboratory analytical reports, draft reports, and final reports? A14) Yes, please refer to Revision #2 above. Q15) Page 27 of the RFQ indicates Phase I and It environmental assessments are included in the scope. Can you please clarify if this is meant to be a Site Assessment Report? A15) Please refer to response to Question #1 above. 016) Page 28 of the RFQ discusses "As-bid" documents for use during assessment. Can you please clarify what work will be bid during the assessment that will require "As-bid" documents, or if this only pertains to oversight of remediation? A16) The referenced section of the RFQ pertains to the oversight of remediation. Q17) Can you please clarify how subcontracted services such as laboratory analysis and drilling costs are anticipated to be handled under this contract and if bidding of subcontracted services will be required by the selected consultant? A17) The City will negotiate all costs associated with the completion of this project with the successful Consulting firm. Please refer to Section 0200, Paragraph 20, entitled Negotiations. Q18) Item 6 on Page 30 prohibits replacing sub-consultants on the project without prior approval of the City Manager. Is the responder required to name sub-consultants (i.e. laboratories, drillers and waste disposal contractors) as part of this RFQ? 3 A18) Yes, Please refer to Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, Tab 2.3. Q19) Task 3, described on page 28, discusses construction administration services. Can you please clarify if these services are applicable to this RFQ for environmental consulting services? A19) The selected bidder will be expected to provide technical input during the design for the remediation plan and assist in overseeing its implementation. Q20) Can you please clarify what information is required to be submitted to confirm insurance requirements will be met by the responder? A20) Prospective firms are not required to submit any information at this time. The purpose of Appendix E is to set forth the minimum levels of insurance that the successful firm will be required to maintain throughout the contract term and any • renewal terms. Certificates of insurance will be requested from the successful firm during negotiations. • 021) If off-site access or off-site notifications of contamination are required, can you please clarify if the City will be responsible for completing these tasks? A21) See response to Question #2 above. Q22) Is there an estimated budget available for this project? A22) The City currently has $350,000 budgeted for assessment, remediation and • monitoring, as needed. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado a(2miamibeachfl.gov - Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: William Garviso 305-673-7000, ext. 6650 WilliamGarviso@miamibeachfl.gov 1 Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Sincerely, Alex P-ni . Procur. ent Director 4 EXHIBIT A PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE SIGN IN SHEET 5 MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET ticµ DATE: January 5, 2018 @ TITLE: RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center „ :r5 r µ .1n' 0 :. � a* :4F i 9* 1 ..:::)'v11.,t a it A i 111:4-1:' f 3 a tt is 5 k 'i'l t L6 `i} moi,� (�,, PrrooccCurrement- CMB 305-673-7000 il1a 1( Trrir�ri.co amtlamibeachfl.gov ext. 6650 ((''�� 77 111 CMIB EmilairIns4- ply) S(N'.n<a1»aLG I JI(IYIIly ko]0517Y5�1\.t sjknIo$OW1(I1.� y MiPwt;btt1CU •5n, I F Ugly Mav 0.Nkcl WeU3 CCAS �v1V11�nw�ewtovd susfi• clef g 441( 4 9 rnwells @rntosvOaeco.hgt itv -2-i- _FlG-1 -n Pt r-- 0 -772c7 f� QI .n ( I\\-1,q R-Pre°°a,els'us,0.001 Sri. 4-11 n 1) 1V A-0 '�' �� e�i)ro1 '1-1?5 t / 71�K,1564 " eOtan (oho,l�i�f-...L,e. 41Z(Yd3 evai .c 1 g 1 5Sistivien,)arrrsongicet i ean,/44, Jq-vrp./z_ c/l &e ' IJova E04,-. /' CAN,ecar.IEN-rwL (9w) &&SI N3OVIy .\ wtteate (Cosiz\-oovA •coM `.Z5C- - ZcffO �,�• 2415OLA-CCCIVIL &d'3,.i S.oW 0/35��-V0® JA414,5 GP- it't:1 —Ig BD ! �t�p-NdLitirr; ehia54e-“Ttcei_y,nant '.4 sorb 'Terra_ ..�.b6 icc 315 SZ° 1'\uco .5of0atcUYacon.com 46I I ? IVIS G-5c-02ncas III Aco toca-'wi g6`i-S ),}�� Ivfrplr- L°cJte 45,0 s\4 6 M LA.. Ati 1% r �•ncce.-n.. 7466 -16'-1 ' `lr�'be/t SD\w aa1C. 11 1 /�V 7 ”-411 0 I r S 1eu0.0L l✓ \al n . COW, MIAMI BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: January 5, 2018 @itnieli'toI tr.-- TITLE: r. -'TITLE: RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center K . II 41-1041 na 1 s 17 ck Storni t�tinsr .i,mfe-.rntnrloon_ (I< c au ( � ��l — u. Tie/ //�N VEM�4 $7r.nnoef=S4c ratA Aver islet_ Ark- 0/03 e/pe! IUorn e0115011103 (s6E,N , ) 3os, 436.9200 Jesse* Poppits Jirnpappas@nova-eonsulHrif,. corn 7h¢Ana ,caciin fA.d,da (.�El) 687 - (.�GO6r7 KUMkn- \J2 dal& 9536 F'S7o kuw,cvi_ EA7IteMA1- co,,, I • • • MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: January 5, 2018 @ 2-8thiftti I' TITLE: RFQ 2018-027-WO Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center t 1 , 141-0 , . ' It1' ' i: t-t. :“' 4 W;44i 4 ifogip:11-0., twin swtezi2a ,: . iff-t::: :.5.5 'sr t!i, .^...$•,., .., . ., _ 7,f., ')...,, ', STALt:mil i itmstwttz-- t'v't:/4i,-' -"ff' :it .q.* 71- at ',:a .,.1,._:iii.A&-,•*4 lakt :,:s It. i I,tf444S-Lt a,:tilkini3t4tryli-Itil7C.IN---1,1.--keW EXHIBIT B PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT(ESA) • • • 6 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida February, 2015 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 ENGINEERING • • r Sciences ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGICAL Prepared for: MIAMIBEACH I City of Miami Beach Office of the City Manager City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive, Fourth Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 224 SE 9th Street• Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316•Tel 954-484-8500• Fax 954-484-5146 •www.esciencesinc.com ENGINEERING lS Sc ces ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGICAL February 3,2015 Ms.Thais Vieira,RA,LEED AP Senior Project Manager Office of the City Manager City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive,Fourth Floor Miami Beach,FL 33139 Subject: Report of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 Dear Ms.Vieira: We are pleased to submit the enclosed Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) report for the above referenced property. A summary of findings is provided in the Executive Summary. Please read the report in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained in the Executive Summary. This report is intended for the use of the City of Miami Beach only. E Sciences' services have been performed under mutually agreed-upon terms and conditions. If other parties wish to rely on this report,please have them contact E Sciences so that a mutual understanding and agreement of the terms and conditions for E Sciences' services can be established via a Secondary Client Agreement prior to their use of this information. We appreciate the opportunity to perform these services for you. Please contact us at(954)484- 8500 if you have questions regarding this information or if we can provide any other services. Sincerely, E SCIENCES,INCORPORATED fiff Maria Paituvi,P.E. Nadia G. Locke,P.E.,LEED AP Senior Engineer Senior Engineer Distribution: Addressee(1 ec) E Sciences, INCORPORATED 224 SE 9th Street • Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 ®This dccument is printed cn recycled paper ph 954-484-8500 fax 954-484-5146 www.esciencesinc.com Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Fehr:tau 3, 2015 2Ist Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page i of iii Miami BeachFlorida E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2 3.0 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 3 4.0 SITE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES 4 4.1 Incremental Soil Sampling 4 4.2 Soil Sampling Analytical Results 5 4.3 Groundwater Sampling Activities 7 4.3.1 Initial Groundwater Sampling Activities 7 4.3.2 Additional Groundwater Sampling Activities 7 4.4 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results 9 5.0 PHASE II ESA LIMITATIONS 10 6.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I I 7.0 REGULATORY INVOLVEMENT 12 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 14 TABLES 1.1 Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser Information 4.1 Soil Analytical Scope 5 4.2 Summary of Soil Contaminant Detections 6 4.3 Initial Groundwater Analytical Scope 7 4.4 Additional Groundwater Analytical Scope 8 4.5 Monitoring Well Construction Detail 8 4.6 Summary of Groundwater Contaminant Detections 9 FIGURES 1 Location Map 2 USGS Topographic Map 3 Aerial Photograph 4A Soil Sampling Locations at Site A 4B Soil Sampling Locations at Site B 5 Groundwater Sampling Locations APPENDICES A Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation B FDEP Groundwater Sampling Logs and Equipment Calibration Logs C Monitoring Well Construction and Development Logs eThis document is printed on recycled paper. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment February 3, 20/5 21 s Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page ii of ii .Miami Beach.Florida E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Report of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 E Sciences conducted a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to evaluate the potential presence of impacts associated with recognized environmental conditions(REC) identified during the Phase I ESA performed by E Sciences and documented in a report provided under separate cover dated November 4,2014. The Site is comprised of two separate areas: Site A and Site B. Site A is a paved parking lot located west of the Miami Beach Convention Center adjacent to Convention Center Drive. Site B is located south of Dade Boulevard and north of the Convention Center. Site A includes the 21" Street Community Center and Band Shell Building, which are used by the Miami Beach Parks and Recreation Division as part of their Teen Club center. The remaining portions of Site B include a paved parking lot and the SoBe Institute of the Arts. These properties provide recreational, cultural and parking services to residents and the public. The area surrounding Site A and Site B consists of both residential and commercial properties. Both Site A and Site B are owned by the City of Miami Beach(the City). Based on a review of historical documentation, Site 13 and the eastern portion of Site A were part of the Miami Beach Municipal Golf Course in the 1950s. Typical chemicals applied to golf courses during this time included arsenates, organochlorine pesticides, and Ethylene Dibromide (EDB). Arsenate pesticides were banned by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the 1980s. Oganoehiorine pesticides include dieldrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), chlordane and toxaphene. Most organochlorine pesticides were banned in the 1970s and 1980s. Many pesticides constituents accumulate and persist over time. The historic operation of a golf course is considered to be a REC due to the likelihood of the repeated historical application of pesticides. Groundwater and soil sampling and analysis were conducted as part of this Phase II ESA. 'Che sampling activities and laboratory analysis conducted were based on the nature of the REC and the typically associated contaminants of concern(COCs). Soil sampling was conducted using Incremental Sampling Methodology in order to collect soil samples representative of site conditions. Site B and the eastern portion of Site A formerly occupied by the historic golf course were defined as separate Decision Units (DU) as part of this Phase II ESA. Groundwater samples were collected from each site using direct push technology ®This document is printed on recycled paper. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Febn,ary 3. 2015 21st Street Cmnmuniiy Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page iii of in Miami Beach, Honda E Scieneec Project Number 7-0002-023 and groundwater monitoring wells. The analytical scope for soil and groundwater samples included organochlorine pesticides, organophosphate pesticides, metals, ammonia, nitrite and nitrate. Soil analytical results revealed the presence of arsenic concentrations above Miami-Dade County's Direct Exposure Residential Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTL) for the incremental soil samples collected from Site A and Site B. The detected arsenic concentrations were above the documented Barrier Islands Naturally Occurring Background Concentration published by Miami-Dade County. Other compounds detected below regulatory standards include lead and pesticides(4,4-DDE,Total Chlordane,and Dieldrin). Laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples did not reveal the presence of groundwater contamination at Site A. Arsenic concentrations were detected above regulatory criteria at one of the three groundwater sampling locations conducted within Site B. The arsenic concentrations were confirmed during a confirmation sampling event. Further laboratory analysis indicated that the presence of arsenic may be associated with dissolved metals in the groundwater. The City submitted a draft Phase II ESA report dated December 17, 2014 to Miami-Dade County Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) for review and comment. That report contained a portion of the data contained herein. On December 23, 2014, The city head a meeting with RER to discuss select contaminated sites owned by the City including the subject sites. RER had conducted only a preliminary review of the draft Phase II ESA at that time. RER requested that additional soil and groundwater testing be conducted for both Site A and Site B and include offsite delineation of the potential impacts. Further investigation regarding the past uses of the properties was also requested. RER noted that additional comments and guidance would be provided upon review of the conceptual site development plans. The City responded to RER's initial comments in email correspondence dated January 8, 2015. The City indicated that offsite assessment would be conducted separately from the assessment of the subject properties. Based on the results of additional aerial photographreview and interview with key personnel, the City determined that the property's past uses do not suggest the need to test additional parameters requested by RER. At this time RER has not responded to the City's email. Based on the assessment information contained herein, the proposed development of the sites and general regulatory guidance provided, we offer the following recommendations: eetas document is printed on recycled paper. Phase II Environmental Sue Assessment February 3,2015 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page lr fiii Miami Beach, Florida E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 • Installation of an engineering control across the sites as part of the site development. At this time we understand that the engineering control will consist of a synthetic impermeable and colored liner followed by 12 inches of clean fill and impermeable pavement. The proposed engineering control shall be approved by RER prior to installation. • Development of a Soil Management Plan and implementation during site development after regulatory approval by RER. • Secure a dewatering permit that includes evaluation and management of impacted groundwater within Site B. Based on the results of the filtered samples, we anticipate that the application of a filter process will be sufficient to treat the water to regulatory standards for disposal purposes if treatment is necessary. • It is anticipated that RER would require a dewatering plan for the property if dewatering is proposed as part of site development. If dewatering is being conducted in areas that are demonstrated not to have arsenic impacts, then the dewatering plan would demonstrate that the dewatering activities would not exacerbate or move groundwater impacts. If dewatering activities will be performed in an area with impacted groundwater, then treatment of the groundwater prior to discharge or disposal of dewatering effluent would be required. • Restrict the use of the irrigation wells to eliminate the influence of pumping impacted groundwater. • Route the point of discharge of drainage structures to outside the impacted area in Site B. We recommend that the City seek RER's conceptual approval of a site development approach elected by the City including the above provisions. Regulatory closure will likely require additional assessment. ethis document is printed on recycled paper. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment February 3,2015 21st Street Cornn:witty Center and Baud Shell Budding and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page 1 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Site is comprised of two separate areas: Site A and Site B. Site A is a paved parking lot located west of the Miami Beach Convention Center adjacent to Convention Center Drive. Site B is adjacent south of Dade Boulevard and north of the Convention Center. Site A includes the 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building, which are used by the Miami Beach Parks and Recreation Division as part of their Teen Club center. The remaining portions of Site B include a paved parking lot and the SoBe Institute of the Arts. These properties provide recreational, cultural and parking services to residents and the public. The area surrounding Site A and Site B consists of both residential and commercial properties. Both Site A and Site B are owned by the City of Miami Beach(the City). The western portion of Site A is comprised of six parcels. Site B and the eastern portion of Site A are listed under the same folio number as the property developed with the Convention Center. Portions of Site B were not linked to property information details on the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser website and a folio number was not identified. Table 1-1 provides information obtained from the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser. TABLE 1-1 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER INFORMATION FOLIO ADDRESS DESCRIPTION 02-3234-007-0110 1855 Meridian Avenue Western portion of Site A 02-3234-007-0100 Not provided Western portion of Site A 02-3234-007-0090 Not provided Western portion of Site A 02-3234-007-0080 Not provided Western portion of Site A 02-3234-007-0070 Not provided Western portion of Site A 02-3234-007-0060 1809 Meridian Avenue Western portion of Site A 02-3234-000-0090 500 17 Street Eastern portion of Site A and Site B A Site location map is provided in Figure 1. A United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map was used to help evaluate topographic information (Figure 2) and (Figure 3) provides aerial coverage for the Site and surrounding properties. The City is planning to redevelop the Site into a recreational park. E Sciences was engaged by the City to perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA). The purpose of the Phase II ESA was to evaluate the potential presence of contamination associated with recognized environmental conditions (RECs) identified during a Phase I ESA conducted in November 2014 (see Section 2.0). eThis document is printed an recycled paper. Phase ll Environmental Site Assessment Eebnm6 3. 20/5 2/5r Street Cnrnrnnnity Center and Band Shell Sledding and Parking Arra west of Convention Center Page 2 of15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION E Sciences, Incorporated (E Sciences) performed a Phase I ESA in general accordance with the consensus document known as ASTM International Practice E 1527-13, a guide for conducting ESAs. The Phase t ESA was documented in a report dated November 4,2014. The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify potential sources of environmental contamination that constitute a recognized environmental conditions (REC), as defined by the ASTM standard. The following findings were documented during the Phase I ESA: • Based on a review of historical documentation, Site B and the eastern portion of Site A were part of the Miami Beach Municipal Golf Course in the 1950s. Typical chemicals applied to golf courses during this time included arsenates,organochlorine pesticides, and Ethylene Dibromide (EDB). Arsenate pesticides were banned by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the 1980s. Oganochlorine pesticides include dieldrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), chlordane and toxaphene. Most organochlorine pesticides were banned in the 1970s and 1980s. Many pesticide constituents accumulate and persist over time. The historical operation of a golf course is considered to be a REC due to the likely historical repeated application of pesticides such as arsenate, DDT and EDB. • A review of historical documentation concerning the area surrounding the Site did not reveal indications of contaminated properties or activities within the Site vicinity that would, in our opinion, be considered a REC in relation to the Site with the exception of the historic golf course. • A review of regulatory documentation concerning the Site and surrounding area did not reveal indications of contaminated properties or activities at the Site, or within the Site vicinity,that would be considered a REC in relation to the Site. • The site reconnaissance did not reveal the presence of Site conditions that would be considered a REC in relation to the Site. E Sciences was engaged by the City to perform a Phase II ESA. The scope of the Phase II ESA was based on historical presence of the golf course within the Site. eThis document in printed on recycled paper. Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment Febnmry 3.2015 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking:Area West of Convention Center Page 3 of 15 E Silences Project.Number 1-0002-013 3.0 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The objective of the Phase II ESA activities was to evaluate the potential presence of contamination based on the findings of the Phase I ESA. The Phase II ESA activities at the Site were based on the suspected location of the RECs identified during the Phase I ESA (see Section 2.0). The sampling activities and laboratory analysis conducted were based on the nature of the RECs and the potential contaminants of concern(COCs) associated with the historical activities at the Site and adjacent properties. The following scope of services was completed: • Soil evaluation using Incremental Sampling Methodology(ISM). • Groundwater sampling and analysis at predetermined locations. eThis document Is printed on recycled paper Phase 11 Encino unental Site Assessment February 3,2015 2194 Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area west of Convention Center Page 4 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 4.0 SITE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES Field activities were conducted by E Sciences personnel on November 20 and 2L, 2014 and January 23,24 and 29, 2015. The drilling services were provided by our subcontractor and licensed water well driller, JAEE Environmental Services, Inc. Laboratory analyses were conducted by state-certified Palm Beach Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (PBEL) and Accutest Laboratories, Inc. (Accutest). Sampling activities were conducted in accordance with FDEP Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) as applicable. The following sections document the activities conducted and findings associated with the Phase II ESA activities. For the purposes of the Phase II ESA, Site A and Site B were assessed separately and a similar sampling scope and methodology was implemented on each site. 4.1 Incremental Soil Sampling Soil samples were collected based on the concept of Incremental Sampling Methodology (ISM). The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council has published an ISM documented dated February 2012. This methodology has been used on other sites within the State with regulatory concurrence and we understand that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) is drafting a guidance document for this process. This soil sampling methodology was implemented in order to collect a representative sample of the Site based on potential historical onsite contamination sources. The eastern portion of Site A and Site B were defined as separate "Decision Units" (DU) (see Figure 4A and Figure 4B). The DU boundaries for Site A were defined based on review of the historical aerial photographs and location of the historical golf course. Large vehicles and equipment were parked along the eastern and western boundaries of Site A; therefore, the DU unit for Site A was limited to the readily accessible area. Each DU was subdivided into uniform grid cells. Based on guidance documents for ISM, a minimum of 30 cells are required within each DU in order to obtain a representative sample of the soil quality within the DU. A total of 32 cells on Site A and 31 cells in Site B were established. A pre-determined soil mass of approximately 45 grams was collected within each grid cell using pre-measured sampling tools provided by the laboratory. These individual samples are referred to as increments. Each increment was collected at a random location and random depth from zero to 12 inches below land surface (bls) within the cell but below the existing asphalt layer. Samples were collected from the subsurface using Direct Push Technology (DPT). Individual increments collected were placed into bulk sample containers. One bulk sample container was designated for analysis of volatile compounds and a second bulk sample container for semi and non-volatile compounds. An aerial photograph of the Site depicting the DU, grid and increment sampling locations is included in Figure 4A and Figure 4B for Site A and B respectively. ®This document ie phnted on recycled paper. Phase 11 Environmental Sae Assessment Febnmry 3, 20/5 26r Slreel Community Center and Band Shell Rullding and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page 5 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 The soil samples were collected in laboratory provided containers and shipped to PBEL under chain of custody protocol for ISM processing and analysis. Upon receipt of the samples, PBEL processed the samples and initiated sub-sampling activities, which included air drying and sieving the bulk sample to remove particles larger than two millimeters. The sieved bulk sample was then spread into a thin layer and a grid was established. A total of 30 increments of equal mass were collected in random locations across the spread-out sample to generate the final multi- increment sample for analysis. This process is referred to as sub-sampling. The mass collected from each sub-sampling location depended on the analytical test. The final multi-increment sample for each DU (DU I and DU2) was analyzed for the following contaminants: arsenic, lead, organochlorine pesticides and organophosphate pesticides TABLE 4-1 SOIL ANALYTICAL SCOPE Contaminant of Concern EPA Analytical Method Arsenic EPA Method SW846 6020B Lead EPA Method SW846 6020B Organochlorine Pesticides EPA Method 8081 Organophosphate Pesticides EPA Method 8270 Duplicate sample (DUPI for DU-I and DUP3 for DU-2) were collected in the field using the same sampling methodology described above. The increments for theses duplicate samples were collected at a location different from the original samples within the same cell. A third replicate was collected using the same increment locations as the initial sample from each DU (DUP2 for DU-I and DUP4 for DU-2) to evaluate the accuracy of the laboratory procedures. The replicate samples were analyzed per the analytical scope provided in Table 4-1 above. 4.2 Soil Sampling Analytical Results Laboratory analytical results were compared to the Miami-Dade County Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs) defined under Chapter 24 of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. Furthermore, analytical results for Arsenic were compared to the "Barrier Islands Naturally Occurring Background Concentrations" documented in the Miami-Dade County Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) Department's memorandum regarding Miami-Dade County Anthropogenic Background Study dated April 3,2014. Analytical results revealed the presence of pesticides compounds (4,4-DDE, Dieldrin and Total Chlordane) and lead above the laboratory method detection limits in select samples. Arsenic concentrations were detected above the Direct Exposure Residential SCTL for the incremental samples collected from Site A and Site B. Table 4-2 presents a summary of the soil analytical ®This r ocumeni is primed an recyced paper. Phase II Environmental Site Asses-mem Fehruary 3, 20/5 2 Et Street Community Center and BandShell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page j6 E Sciences Project Mrmber 7-0002-023 results for the detected analytes. Laboratory analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are included in Appendix A. TABLE 4-2 SUMMARY OF SOIL PARAMETER DETECTIONS gamma- alpha- Total Site Sample ID Chlordane Chlordane 4,4-DDE Dieldrin Chlordane Arsenic Lead mg/kg DU-2 0.0009 0.0006 • 0.0045 0.00004 U 0.0015 5.75 25.4 Site A DUP3 0.0011 0.0008 0.0034 0.00004 U 0.0019 5.52 25.5 DUP4 0.0004 0.0003 0.0015 0.00004 U 0.0007 5.49 35.1 DU-1 0.0011 0.0006 0.0067 0.00004 U 0.0017 9.04 45.5 Site B DUPI 0.0007 0.0004 0.0032 0.0001 0.0012 9.13 311 E DUP2 0.003 0.0003 0.0026 0.00004 U 0.0006 10.4 42.2 Miami-Dade Direct Exposure Residential SCTL NA NA 2.9 0.06 2.8 2.1 400 Miami-Dade Direct Exposure Commercial/Industrial SCTL NA NA 15 0.3 14 12 1400 Miami-Dade Leachability based SCTL NA NA 18 0.002 9.6 *** *** - Barrier Islands Naturally Occurring Background Concentration NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 NA Notes: This table presents only the concentrations of analytes detected. Other analytes were not detected above laboratory method detection limits and are not included in this summary table. Analytical results presented in mg/Kg unless specified mg/Kg: milligram per kilogram U: Indicates analyte not detected above laboratory method detection limit. BOLD Indicates contaminant above Miami-Dade SCTL E:The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the instrument.This value is considered an estimate(CLP E-flag). ***Leachability values may be derived using the SPLP Test to calculate the site-specific SCTLs or may be determined using TCLP in the event of oily wastes are present. NA :Not Applicable eThis documenl Is creed on recycled paper. Phase 1I Enronnmenrol Site A ccecsmerrt Eebruary 3,2015 2 LV Street('ommi ii,in.('enter and Band Shell Building and Parking A rea 44est of Convention Cerner Pei e7 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-013 4.3 Groundwater Sampling Activities Groundwater sampling activities were conducted at the Site in order to evaluate the potential presence of groundwater impacts associated with the historical operation of the golf course. Two sampling events were conducted. An initial sampling event was conducted on November 21, 2013. A second event was conducted on January 25 and 29, 2015 based on information and requirements presented by Miami-Dade County Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) department to include additional COCs(refer to Section 7.0). 4.3.1 Initial Groundwater Sampling Activities The initial groundwater sampling was conducted using DPI by advancing probes to approximately two feet into the water table using a stainless steel well point and withdrawing the point to expose four feet of stainless steel screen. The groundwater sampling locations (DP-1 on Site B and DP-2 on Site A) are depicted on Figure 5. Groundwater sampling activities were conducted in accordance with FDEP Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Field parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and turbidity) were measured during purging using a multi-sensor probe and turbidity meter. Groundwater samples were collected in laboratory supplied containers,packaged in ice-filled coolers and shipped to PBEL under chain of custody protocol for analysis. Groundwater sampling logs are included in Appendix B. Table 4- 3 presents a summary of the COCs and analytical methods conducted during the initial sampling event. TABLE 4-3 INITIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SCOPE Contaminant of Concern EPA Analytical Method Arsenic EPA Method SW846 60208 Lead EPA Method SW846 60208 Organochlorine Pesticides EPA Method 8081 Organophosphate Pesticides EPA Method 8270 4.3.2 Additional Groundwater Sampling Activities Upon completion of the soil sampling and initial groundwater sampling events, a draft Phase II ESA report dated December 17, 2014 was submitted to the City. The City submitted the draft Phase II ESA report to RER for review and comment (See Section 7.0 for additional regulatory involvement information). Based on this review, RER requested that the COCs for the assessment include the following parameters: eThis document is printed on recycled paper. Phase II Earl vnmcmml Sae Assessment February 3, 2015 21st Street Community Center and Rand Shell Building and Parking Area Wen of Convention Center Page 8 of/S E Sciences I'n'ject Number 7-0002-023 TABLE 4-4 ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SCOPE Contaminant of Concern EPA Analytical Method • EPA Method SW846 6010/6020: As, Pb, 13 RCRA Metals* Cd, Ag,Cr,Cu,TI, Sb, Be, Ni, Se,Zn EPA Method SW846 7470/747 L Hg Nitrates EPA Method 353.2 Nitrites EPA Method 353.2 Ammonia EPA Method 350.1 *Arsenic(As),Lead(Pb),Cadmium(Cd), Silver(Ag),Chromium (Cr), Selenium (Se), Mercury(Hg), Beryllium (Be),Zinc (Zn),Nickel(Ni), Copper(Cu), Antimony(Sb),Thallium(TI). Based on the anticipated dewatering activities at both sites during the proposed development, the City elected to install two monitoring wells at each site to evaluate the potential presence of the additional COC identified by RER. Two monitoring wells were installed at Site A(MW-1 and MW-2) and Site B (MW-3 and MW-4) as depicted on Figure 5. The monitoring wells were installed using DPT on January 23,2015 by JAEE under E Sciences oversight. The monitoring wells were installed to a maximum depth of 15 feet bls and constructed of ten feet of pre-packed well screen and a five-foot PVC riser. The wells were completed with a well cap and a traffic-bearing manhole. Well construction and development logs are provided in Appendix C. Well construction details are summarized in Table 4-5 below. TABLE 4-5 MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL MONITORING • Total Screen Well Installation SITE WELL ID. Depth(ft Interval(ft Diameter Method bls) bls) (inches) • MW-I 15 5-15 125 DPT Site A MW-2 15 5-15 1.25 DPT MW-3 15 5-15 1.25 DPT Site B MW-4 15 5-15 1.25 DPT The newly installed monitoring wells were sampled on January 24, 2015. Groundwater sampling activities were conducted in accordance with FDEP Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Field parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and turbidity) were measured during purging using a multi-sensor probe and turbidity meter. Groundwater samples were collected in laboratory supplied containers,packaged in ice-filled coolers and shipped to Accutest under chain of custody protocols. Groundwater sampling logs are included in Appendix B. The eThis document is pined on recyc'ad paper. Phase II Enrironrnenlal Sire A.ssessrnent February 3,2015 21st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area Wen cif Convention Center Page 9 of15 E Sciences Project Mumber 7-0002-023 analytical scope for these samples included the COCs identified by RER and also organochlorine pesticides based on the detection of those parameters on the ISM soil samples collected. 4.4 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results Laboratory analytical results were compared to the Miami-Dade County Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels(GCTLs)defined under Chapter 24 of the Miami-Dade Code of Ordinances. Intiial analytical results revealed the presence of arsenic and lead above the laboratory method detection limit but below GCTLs. The other COCs were not detected above the corresponding laboratory method detection limit. A summary of the laboratory detections is provided in Table 4-4 below. Laboratory analytical reports and chain of custody documentation are included in Appendix A. TABLE 4-6 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANT DETECTIONS Antimony Arsenic Dissolved Chromium Lead Nickel Silver Zinc Ammonia Arsenic ug/1 mgrl Miami-Dade GCTL 6 10 10 100 IS 100 100 5000 2.8 Site Sample Sampling ID Date DP-I 11/21/2014 NA 83 NA NA 6 NA NA NA NA 1/24/2015* 2.2 1 213 1.3 U IOU 1.1 U 0.40 U 0.80 1 5.9 1 LO Site B MW-3 12912015** NA 24.6 25 NA NA NA NA NA. NA MW-4 1/242015 1.5 f 4.1 1 NA 1.8 1 1.1 U 1.61 0.70 U _ 4.4 U 0.22 DP-2 11:212013 0.377 NA U NA NA 6 NA NA NA NA SiteA MW-I 1/242015 LOU 1.30 NA 1.51 1_IU 0.4011 0.70 U 8.11 1.6 MW-2 P24:2015 1.11 1.3 U NA 1.41 1.1 U 0.40U 070 U 641 1.4 Notes: This table presents only the concentrations of analytes detected. Other analytes were not detected above laboratory method detection limits and are not included in this summary table. *Laboratory filtered with 0.45 micron filter. **Field filtered with 1.0 micron tiller. ug/L: Micrograms per Liter mg/L: Milligrams per Liter U:Indicates analyte not detected above laboratory method detection limit. I: Indicates analyte concentration above the maximum detection limit but below practical quantitation limit. NA=Not Analyzed for that parameter. BOLD Indicates contaminant above Miami-Dade GCTL *ti document is printed on recycled pacer. Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment Febnmry 3,2015 2lst Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page 10 of15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 5.0 PHASE II ESA LIMITATIONS Although this assessment has attempted to identify the potential for environmental impacts to the Site,potential sources of contamination may have escaped detection due to: • the limited scope of this assessment • the inaccuracy of public records • the presence of undetected or unreported environmental incidents - • inaccessible areas or • deliberate concealment of detrimental information by others It was not the purpose of this study to determine the actual degree or extent of contamination, if any, at the Site. The sampling conducted as part of the Phase II ESA was intended to confirm the presence of impacts based on the identified RECs. No sampling or analysis was conducted outside the locations identified within this document. Due to the limited nature of this Phase II ESA, there is a possibility that conditions may exist which were not apparent at the time of report preparation and completion of the previous Phase I ESA. It is also possible that the testing methods employed at the time of the report may later be superseded by other methods. The description, type, and composition of what are commonly referred to as"hazardous materials or conditions"can also change over time. E Sciences does not accept responsibility for changes in the state of the art, nor for changes in the scope of various lists of hazardous materials or conditions. E Sciences believes that the findings and conclusions provided in this report are reasonable. However,no other warranties are implied or expressed. eibis document is printed on recycled paper. Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment Eehnmry 3, 2015 21st Saxer Commun6e Center and Band Shell Building mid Parking Area West of Convention Center Page 11 of 15 E Sciences Prvjeci Number 7-0002-023 6.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The Phase II ESA was designed to evaluate the potential presence of impacts from the historic operation of a golf course at the Site identified during the previous Phase[ESA. Soil analytical results revealed the presence of arsenic concentrations above Miami-Dade County's Direct Exposure Residential Soil Cleanup Target Levels (serf.) for the incremental soil samples collected from Site A and Site B. The detected arsenic concentrations were above the documented Barrier Islands Naturally Occurring Background Concentration published by Miami-Dade County. Other compounds detected below regulatory standards include lead and pesticides(4,4-DDE,Total Chlordane,and Dieldrin). Groundwater samples collected from Site A did not reveal the presence of COCs above the corresponding GCTLs. Therefore, no groundwater impacts were identified within Site A during this limited assessment. Groundwater samples collected from Site B revealed the presence of arsenic concentration above the GCTL in one of the three sampling locations. The arsenic concentration detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-3 was reported above the GCTL as confirmed by a second sampling event conducted based on initial results. To further evaluate the presence of arsenic, the laboratory was asked to filter the sample collected on November 21, 2015 and analyze'for dissolved arsenic. The laboratory filtered the sample using a 0.45 micron filter, and the results that dissolved arsenic concentration for the sample was not detected above the laboratory detection limit or the GCTL. The second sample collected at this location on January 29, 2015 was filtered on the field using a 1.0 micron filter per FDEP SOPs. Analysis of this sample revealed a similar concentration of arsenic for the unfiltered and filtered samples, both above the(]CTL. Based on these observations,we conclude that the laboratory filtering method and 0.45 micron filter size was more effective in removing dissolved metals from the sample aliquot. Based on the results documented herein, arsenic concentration are present above the GCTL within a portion of Site B. The extent of the arsenic impacts cannot be determined based on results available at this time. ®This document is pdnled on recyced paper. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Eebrwiiy 3,2015 21st Street Comrnunity Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Arra West of Convention Center Page 12 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 7.0 REGULATORY INVOLVEMENT The City submitted the draft Phase H ESA report dated December 17, 2014 to Miami-Dade County RER for review and comment regarding the regulatory course of action based on the results of the[SM soil testing and initial soil and groundwater sampling. On December 23, 2014, a meeting was held between RER, the City, Atkins and E Sciences representatives to discuss select contaminated sites owned by the City including the subject sites. RER had conducted only a preliminary review of the draft Phase II ESA at that time. Items discussed during this meeting regarding the subject site included: • The need to develop and implement a Soil Management Plan during construction activities; • The background naturally occurring arsenic concentration within the island is considered to be the applicable cleanup standard for these sites; • The extent of impacts has not yet been delineated based on the limited scope of the Phase II ESA; • Potential regulatory closure approaches; • Engineering and institutional controls; • Delineation and excavation of arsenic impacted soil; • Drainage and dewatering considerations might be required and would be determined based on additional groundwater sampling and analysis; • Acceptable engineering control alternatives were discussed(i.e. artificial turf, asphalt and concrete parking lots,geomembranes,clean soil cover). RER issued initial comments regarding the Phase II ESA in email correspondence dated December 24,2014. RER requested that additional soil and groundwater testing be conducted for both Site A and Site B and include offsite delineation of the potential impacts. Further investigation regarding the past uses of the properties was also requested. RER noted that additional comments and guidance will be provided upon review of the conceptual site development plans. The City responded to RER's initial comments in email correspondence dated January 8, 2015. The City indicated that offsite assessment would be conducted separately from the assessment of the subject properties. The City stated that based on a more extensive review of additional historical aerial photos, the presence of building structures just north of the original Convention Center building were observed. The City interviewed a city employee who has been with the City for 47 years, and he confirmed that these buildings and other activities visible in this area were associated with the Parks & Recreation Department Headquarters housed at that location. The Department used this property to store the maintenance equipment and products associated ®this document is printed on recycled paper. Phase 11 En vironmenml Site Assessment February 3.2015 221st Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page 13 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 with their operations throughout the City. Based on the results of additional aerial photograph review and interview with key personnel, the City determined that the property's past uses do not suggest the need to test additional parameters requested by RER. At this time RER has not responded to the City's email. eThis document is printed on recycled paper. Phase 11 Environmental Sire Assessment Febnrary 3, 206 21n Street Community Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convention Center Page 14 of/S E Sciences Project Number -0002-023 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of this Phase [I ESA and general guidance provided by RER, we provide the following recommendations regarding the proposed development of Site A and Site B: Recommendations pertaining to existing soil impacts are as follows: • Prepare a Soil Management Plan (SMP) for review and approval by RER prior to site development activities. The SMP should include the following provide procedures and precautions to be implemented for the management of contaminated soil during construction activities. The SMP should include information associated with the following items, at a minimum: o Background Information; o Soil Management Requirements such as designated storage areas, stockpile management and tracking protocols; o Soil Characterization and Disposal Requirements; o Dust Control measures; o Waste Disposal; o Decontamination procedures; o Notification and responsibility requirements; o Site control measures; o Site maps. • At this time we understand that the City has elected to proceed with the installation of an engineering control in order to prevent exposure and migration of the impacted soil. Based on the 30% design site plan provided by the City for the proposed development, specific areas of Site A and Site B will be covered with a minimum of 12 inches of fill. • Based on information provided by RER,installing a liner of specific characteristics(color and impermeability) below 12 inches of fill may be sufficient to achieve the required level of protection and serve as an engineering control for the Site. It is our understanding that this engineering control alternative will be presented to RER for formal approval. Liner characteristics may include,but are not limited to, impermeability and color. • Therefore, on those areas proposed to be raised by a minimum of 12 inches of fill, an adequate liner will be installed prior to installation of the fill layer. • The areas not currently proposed to be covered with a minimum of 12 inches of fill will be excavated to a depth of 12 inches in order to install the liner followed by 12 inches of clean fill. Please note that excavated soil will be subject to the SMP provisions and shall be treated as contaminated soil. • Those areas proposed to be covered by impermeable pavement(such as paved pathways, roadways,parking) will serve as an engineering control (to be approved by RER). eThis document is prinled an recycled paper. Plume II Environmental Site Assessment February 3,2015 210 Street Cornrnnnin Center and Band Shell Building and Parking Area West of Convene ion Center Page 15 of 15 E Sciences Project Number 7-0002-023 Recommendations pertaining to existing groundwater impacts are as follows: • Groundwater sampling did not indicate the presence of COCs within Site B. Therefore no groundwater provisions are expected to be required during development on that site. However, RER might request that additional groundwater sampling be conducted in the specific dewatering areas to provide assurance that no groundwater impacts are present within those areas and no potential groundwater contamination migration or exacerbation occurs during dewatering. • Arsenic concentrations were detected above the GCTL for the groundwater samples collected from MW-3 at She B. Therefore the following general recommendations are provided: o Secure a dewatering permit that includes evaluation and management of impacted groundwater within Site B. Based on the results of the filtered samples, we anticipate that the application of a filter process will be sufficient to treat the water to regulatory standards for disposal purposes if treatment is necessary. o It is anticipated that RER would require a dewatering plan for the property if dewatering is proposed as part of site development. If dewatering is being conducted in areas that are demonstrated not to have arsenic impacts, then the dewatering plan would demonstrate that the dewatering activities would not exacerbate or move groundwater impacts. If dewatering activities will be performed in an area with impacted groundwater, then treatment of the groundwater prior to discharge or disposal of dewatering effluent would be required. o Restrict the use of the irrigation wells to eliminate the influence of pumping impacted groundwater. o Route the point of discharge of drainage structures to outside the impacted area in Site B. We recommend that the City seeks RER's conceptual approval of the closure approach elected by the City including the above provisions. The above recommendations are concerning development of the subject properties and do not include provisions regarding the regulatory requirements regarding site assessment. Please note that RER may not grant regulatory closure of the site based on the absence of soil impact delineation within the property boundaries and the requirement for offsite delineation. Please note offsite assessment and implementation of a restrictive covenant for the properties may be required to complete the regulatory closure of the subject sites. eThu documenl is prinled on recycled paper. Coral Sprin.. Pompano Beach ,:.,, • CE o e ±• kk•na " W 30th St Jt3c st 1' ,y hatch a • oitywood leant .i '`'th Si Pembrok- w 29th st Project Location 0 19/n st E 4 ags. 6' am sr !'`" Miami W 26th 51 P . 41 t a hsti a J'1 16v, = . J" H• stead st o u O as tr c a e F 760,st _.. n ^ e W 77t1 St .r.. Sr 7 .1. W lith In, 't 3 W lith st 7 i W24th St 0 .7 W 23rd St LI.nltd C •.;-, 5. f : ,_, 1 s1 G u a • yr ,•- .,.,..0 6 ?�, 4- • • .4 .ja Q s, W 22nd St S� 0''{ khan. �' v.>• °sr•I , Sunset ? Ba oc' P• o %lands *.t. Oa .3n$t au11 :� . Q ??nu s. w 21st St •I• Site 13 - c V° • C• 101/,sr 20th Stj ; ,.h:^.,.n....n ion 19th St ?Ot.S,' 19th SI t Site A� c ° 18th St ,' 3- 406 18th St •c c v s sc* Miami ; 6 a- latent Pt"s Beach c - c 17th St _... .. . 17th St Q a v_ Soendsap Park o f <' 3 5 c Lincoln to N t,r.,:u Q ,..oro, .r,i t n;.. .. Lincoln Rd a A It. Inc oln Rd M+11 _ i Untoln Rd -. a • < Lincoln Ln 5 Lintotn Tel T.: < 0 3 L. itf. ::_::, 316th Stec ?.. 51.' . . ...- - _ 16th St • c - cc V a C m15th Ter _ , a a u 15th St 15th Sto Espanola Way 14th Cl 14th PI 1 4th Tet 5 o • 1f • 6 4 1415 St E 14th St a f fr O `o o c o a o 2 U c c < e 13t Monad Ter J h St . c 13M Ta St rLvnno ii O y • Pore -e o Background Source:Bing World Baseman C u Legend 12111 St 12th SI 1r„ u 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2.000 —•a I Project Location ---- Feet 11th S. 9 E Sciences.Incorporated FIGURE P. 21FL Engineering Lic.#8691 st Street Community enter r 224 SE 9th Street _4114 M ''.Sci ce$Ft.Lauderdale.Florida 33316 and Band Shell Building and Parking Location Map www.esciencesinc.com Phone:954-484-8500 Area West of Convention Center n Fax: 954.484-5146 DRAWN CHECKED PROJECT NUMBER: Miami Beach, FL SCALE: DATE: g BY:TV BY: MP 7-0002-023 1"31,000' 12/1212014 .....:4 ..:.. '..........4i1 / 41111)-s. - .irl , a 0At' .k'.7 t, 1111114011 ' . ° _ 27 25- i_ . ..,t` - _.,_ _ L , 1 .....J VI, eJ, .\ ..,.. , ., ., , ., e •••,, , - ,.." t -iiiii...-- ...„, "s h.? e:j nfif LUMEN', 44) .-- --.... ,41 \ ,- .,..,__,._ •-r—Iii. , . ..J.... . , .. ... , , ,, 907: 9 ir„. „:77-. -... / : --,-1 es -1 i/4,• ,, , /::*. l ,„a,.Q., ik ' ,1 Gott course ?STH S't r. ` i' C} , r :ill ir 1.•••• Oa. pi 0 . .•••rlri/" i11.111.4. C4 h. • t 1',• �', '`li • V ii ll 4igh •:� ,r :v.? �. J ;e:f far ...• 11 �• -4. (, lissisb . / ' e.,_ • „,,...„.__ , ..... ........_„. ..10„. ,•*pk:i_itti; ehl 7 ii(* -4;) .. :-.V.:„ t [( ••moi Yi r- T ...• " , ' ~ �7 ,V7 - It L. _._. Pk .,-1 � i, ..'aii- mss. 1 ........wer Al ...•••4.,0 .r.-- -iug.ia.eutmmxrnra.m..swnonp-r. it .,!ea..___. .- --• . , , . - 1 ..-,It 47'la( ID r: a .,.. . ... • t :�;i.• t r 33 1, 11,,,int,..„.i1 ' s is y• f1 �. u __. t >oh.. ,_ . _._ _ ,::.::::: 1 t. ... ..._, ..46,„ ...... ...a., ..... ..... .._< ____.if.._ ---_-_ =*---1, ___ ..,. -,. .,...,... , , �" � ' .. I 1 . r g 1, V LT$ . d otT —7-:j111111 •f •' •' 7 El: ► • ___ ,i i► . ::: , Background Source.L.21',-07l/S-A 4 MIMI tr.A._lwei. .ti. `,'452 ...,.. WM 42 ... ; Legend griti, ; .r.:i.'it r.' •I _L,C 1 ` ' film 1 1 0 250 500 1.000 1.500 2.000 X01„ Project Location -� 3 - Feet i 4 E Sciences.Incorporated FIGURE. FL Engineering Uc.E8691 21st Street Community Center 224 SE 9th Street —'SCI CeSFLLauderdale.Florida33316 and Band Shell Building and Parking USGS Topographic Map 2 WWW.eScience5inc.0on1 Area West of Convention Center Phone:954.484-8500 Fax: 954.484-5146 L o DRAWN CHECKED PROJECT NUMBER: Miami Beach, FL SCALE: DATE: 9 BY:TV BY: MP 7-0002-023 1•=1,000' 12/12..2014 a lie'f. ' • i / -. 416') r.4%;7''z. ' t's ,. �ei r lip' ' ' —sly • . " ;#/ ' . 1. (Ck— 1 4rAil .' R i . Aillt...1,1c,1 4.; r- .,. .0 .ri,112'.'".•, ,l',';', , •011;ak. .,. c + t1 •� rr+ `�'�' • 3 • -el' .� 'IP es . irs" t • -Ark:- - 4,„,-%f,,,5- 2*,44-4 N. Ifs> :P.,i5v.,6 , 0:..scr's G\ „.,,-.-4, . ellig ' tit ' �T ♦ e^A..` 1 Y p��w " �l-,.os" tel. • P FNM.. �. ,tri S' _ ��s ••�a.v 141, +1 t 1 466 44'rr - • Is ,,,, 4 . ' . : littfc: - '. ' ' Cop . . t + a., Site B -j '' tjlii.t. . i i or.,, I/✓ J l.• lit t �r / • 78: S7, 1 • , 14,, , • • I .47:6T 4Airt; -'!:.<, 4741, 0 , ' a , 1r "m . • m ri . __ 1 w / 2 h' 0t Zi,,,,, _ J .c'% `' _- - .r t• 1 F 1 19th St Poa.: _ ;,6 "19.• •..-_. U ,.--;.?? i - • S •• ori L • I • I V1. _ _ cK r�o+ `� t . jp.„ .. 4 ' 't siri ' c • 1J .4. 10th st - —!'q" �` g . r >r =12I a t Y Ciro iii"1 ° I-,1 � • � - . r * • l` v i MIR • q,, , t' e , ..,..,:-t i- II ' 4 . WA ' _dr. _ , - :41 rMIU11\ • AR' * "Ir. tZ:iiii !i IR 1 7 t hlit S t"�'amesst • 6 " . i• .11;' ` 1- -i n F. i 4c.'-+ i �a ,:•-:- > — ....I •_ - .yam •� •U F • -- j • " _ - Ltncoln Ln N -. a :�i W ,r. . re,.` 1 .t r Iii - ''Lincoln • - - 4,' i G Y •• Mal .r ._4' It t - T _;,a h. ' -1r-` '. Lincoln-RQ I _ - 1 Rackgrou 0Source.FDD- q• p (' r ,•t -- • "� �� il - 3 Legend XPi-"":' C: . . Y "` '• � '� . ... - �, t. + . 0 t00 200 400 -;Oc Project Location • �, +�, t� ° ..c.� t g _—_— ' Ji.1.- .• I • `a — — -- s v E Sciences.Incorporated FIGUR= FL Engineering Lic.N8691 21st Street Community Center 224 SE 9th Street •_SC1 cesFLLa.uderdale.Florida 33316 and Band Shell Building and Parking Aerial Photograph Phone:954-esin8 00 Area West of Convention Center 3 Phone:954-484-8500 r Fax: 954-484-5146 DRAWN CHECKED PROJECT NUMBER: Miami Beach, FL SCALE: DATE: 9 BY:TV BY: MP 7-0002-023 1"=400' 12/12/2014 - __-__- 117Fr1' ' • r^ , i .31i r •r • ri vi ,.,. , j • . • , . _ it . vat 1 .1 : !Tr . , 1 - (.._!:', ;' i 1 c • k - 1 - 13:. : / OP .,_...: - . ',• 7,i g• 1: 1 1 i iiiiiiiiii i' . A N .I- ..,,_ -, 1.:(/ 4 ,,, ,,:,... .. . /.„ ., . . ,• • A.4, ! . ___, ,,. 2... . ., i ki,,, , !,/, ..n. in •--_. 'S i' - I 'If'liiiiii/lilliiii' , t----, ' .. , ort,:i ,,,,„ , ._ . • , ‘, , I, // 0, . • 0\- _, . , , ,v Au , _ i .„ ..........,, ..:_ , , i: .4„.„ , r - ir g4- ivc !.. _ V A, ic,ito.,,, , nor i '• - ' 0 ././I All r0007/9 li.. 15 I://, / • v. A ,.fi i. kr 1 0 r ii, ' • • L _.—:--_._ ---1 — t_ . ,_ :'Ifir ' llii 1140 I % X - :��- i- ~` ^ ' ' ~ ""�r+��.,�r�� -'^+-' ��-~~'�_. `_ - ''� - + � I Legend �' _ ✓ .-••• � r • ,, Deo�onUnit ' -1 '- � ,-.. .i.----, ' ' - Incremental Sampling Locations ...--f,--•....� -- • Sample Increment Location ,~ ^ ` J �Tr' �~+^�'�^'-^w ` • Duplicate Snm�eLoomdon __ � �� . « a Aroeina000�b�duehuequipmontandveh�� . �� - E7� pmd�ngod�n��neofu�mp|�goohvden� ��' �� ~ �`. . `» '«, *0 � �° � __ '__� cSciences.IncorporatedFIG.,", 21st Street Community Center224 SE 9th Street Soil Sampling Locations 1L' f `v and Band SheUBuilding and Parking � '� � �� Area West ofConxundonCenter etSite A 4cesFax: 954-484-5146 � DRAWN CHECKED �oJ�Twvwasn. Miami Beach, FL oc^Ls. DATE: 4 v,.= BY: MP 7-0002-023 1....00' /2/12/201' 1114 ' ' t".4'4''17..r. '' Si . ..../........j ,. .5.-4:7.4 . ,..• • , t ....., ... .. -. •, ... .......,. . IV 1. 4, J 4111.11,1r1:- • . t •w!; '.r '� .1 ! S Y 1 Imo: r g• s -•: : �` /a • • ''- I . +' + ••/. 10. / 1I 3 •'I* -' w I '4 r is !/ • ! �i ••/ re � t 7 •-1• `Y - • •/ �� " ,may°*: •' ' I i • • . 'LI: 0 „. .,.__,„;,_ . 1 7•'..-•._..-..-..-..-..-..-• 1_ ,_ i .11. ''.'1- . . . 1\ F*'' ',', ••• I r I. Q r o Ba,Background Sour<o�na World Ima9ay - * r ••' 4 E Legend — + r`.-- - 1 . •r 1 r••� Decision Unit _ n _.•. P Incremental Sampling Locations t ;. i. • Sample Increment Location r _ w 4 1111 _ -j 0 2`, 100 150 CO2 • Duplicate Sample Location r r r = Feet s 771 9 E Sciences.Incorporated FL EngineeringLic.#8691 21st Street Community Center 224 SE 9th Street Soil SamplingLocations / SCI cesFt.Lauderdele,Florida33316 and Band Shell Building and Parking at Site B Phon :9i5-484. 500 Area West of Convention Center 4B Phone:954-484.8500 Fax: 954-484-5146 DRAWN CHECKED PROJECT NUMBER: Miami Beach, FL SCALE: DATE: 9 BY:TV BY: MP 7-0002-023 1"=150• 12;12.2014 xr of i • irsaiii.„ r . IF7f,..../.41 At,_ ' * likolz,.. 1-11:-it i:i„ t . ,.. yy� R, 1 4 i/ me .•I !, ,,.. 'N-' 1 '114 • /, �Jy �1 r- ., II '. Yom, . a' ii, ' rt iIc .s v r ,�• f J( r \ , I. " .. -i ! b gam. ,'` 1FI .1. '• A • ! ''''; • •• • 1 t, ‘t .&,- . yst t• aMW 3t } j �; !If ' I A:` .•1I gyp ),4i . • . TI. r • WWI o 1' r •l k k_c 1 • • . . . t f• • !, i, 1: , , : s. 4' • %..-3§11A:{A - . i. . I : •el •• '''..- . .. , 4 ; puf., IiII, 4‘. • . , It raimid. . . 7- .:. . , • e . 1 , . • Itrib j MW-1I r-' I • yr;_ _ ^, i.^ A !.s DP-2 j` r..'. 1 ., il ,11,. 1 I: • — I 1-: ! ` I � — -- MW-2 • iBackground1 o 11;0_1._ ` �� oie , : I( T -Ai >-.4 • Jl Legend . '1 _ 1 1 ,t.li ,--_� - 4,1 '•i_._- 11111111 `_— v r••I Project Location M. ' ; r • t# t, • MonitoringWell Locations , "3 -.---T - �\ `a -.r • 7 � ...9..1•., .• • 0 50 100 200 300 400 • Direct Push Sampling Locations vi '. ' O.- ---- Feet s 4 E Sciences.Incorporated FIGURE FL Engineering Lic.#8691 21st Street Community Center Groundwater Sampling 224 SE 9th Street p g a, 1 —Scces F1 33316 and Band Shell Building and Parking Locations hon : int.tOrn5 Phone:954484-8500 Area West of Convention Center Fax: 954-484.5146 o DRAWN CHECKED PROJECT NUMBER: Miami Beach, FL SCALE: DATE: 9 BY:TV BY: MP 7-0002-023 1"=200' 112812015 APPENDIX A Palm Beach Environmental ,„V Laboratories Inc. L( 67141 , - • 155*: Maria Paituvi December 04, 2014 E Sciences Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954)484-8500 LOG #: 0013067 Enclosed is the laboratory report for your project. All results meet the requirements of the NELAC standards. Please note the following: (1) The samples were received as stated on the chain of custody, correctly labeled and at the proper temperature unless otherwise noted.The results contained in this report relate only to the items tested or to the samples as received by the laboratory. (2) This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Any anomalies are noted in the case narrative. (3) Results for all solid matrices are reported in dry weight unless otherwise noted. (4) Results for all liquid matrices are analyzed as received in the laboratory unless otherwise noted. (5) Samples are disposed of within 30 days of their receipt by the laboratory. (6) A statement of Qualifiers is available upon request. (7) Certain analyses are subcontracted to outside NELAC certified laboratories and are designated on your report. (8) Precision &Accuracy will be provided when clients require a measure of estimated uncertainty. (9) The issuance of the final Certificate of Analysis takes precedence over any previous Preliminary Report Preliminary Data should not be used for regular purposes. Authorized signature(s) is provided on final report only Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this report. Sincerely, Pamela Shore QA Officer EPA# FL01227 DOH#E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 1 of 14 _- Palm Bead,Ernironmerial Latoratoriea Inc. s1A4 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COGS: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:24:08AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DP2-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-01 Sampled: 11/21/14 12:45 Matrix: Water Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis c&5# Parameter Results Q Units Method DF MDI. TOL Date Date Analyst 314046 alpea6HC 0.004 1EE,U u0/L EPA 3510C/80814 1 0.004 0311 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lndane) 0.004 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8081A 1 0.009 0..011 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.006 3EE,U ug/L EPA 3510[/8081A 1 0.006 0..017 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 309-90.2 AIOnn 0.004 lEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/806/4 1 0.004 0911 11/25/14 1166/14 SL 3:405-7 bemEHC 0.004 1EE,U a9/L EPA 35100/80914 1 0.004 0.213 11/25/14 11/26/14 5L 3:406-8 dela-BHC 0.004 IEE,V ug/L EPA 3510C/00914 1 0.004 0.012 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.004 ]EE,U ug/L EPA 35100/80814 1 0.004 0.9: 11/25/14 11/26/I4 5L 959-989 Endosulfan l 0.004 lEE,J ug/L EPA 35100/SOBIA 1 0.004 0.014 11/25/14 1166/19 SL 5566-34-7 gamma-Chlordane 0.020 lEE,U ug/L EPA3510C/8031A 1 0.020 0.060 11/25/14 11/26/14 1 5103-71-9 . alpha-ate/Wee 0.020 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/80810. 1 0.020 0.060 11/25/14 11/26/14 1 72-55-9 4,4-DDE 0.005 lEE U u9/L EPA 35100/8981A 1 0.005 0.015 11/25/14 11/26/14 1 60-57-1 Ditlann 0.00975 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/808:A 1 0.00075 0.002 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 72-20-8 Endrin 0.004 1EE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/80814 1 0.004 0.0:3 11/25/14 11/26/14 51 3321165-9 Encrcul]an II 0.008 lEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8081A 1 0.006 0.017 11/25/14 1126/14 SL 72#8 4,4000 0.002 IEE,U u4/'_ EPA 35100/80614 1 0.002 0007 11/25/14 1166/14 SL 51-29-3 4,4-DDT 0.004 1EE,U ug/L EPA 35100/80614 1 0.004 0.013 11/25/14 11126/34 SL 742193-4 Endnn aldehyde 0.003 lEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/80614 1 0.003 0.010 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 1031-07-8 Endosulian sulfate 0.003 IEE U u01L EPA 35100/80814 I 0.003 0.008 1125/19 11/26/14 SL 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.005 IEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/80814 1 0.005 0.015 11/25/14 11/26/14 5L 53494-70-5 Endrin Ketone 0.003 IEE,U uyL EPA 3510C/8081A 1 0.003 0.010 11/25/14 11/26/14 51 NA Total Chlordane 0.020 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/80014 1 0.020 0.060 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 3001-31-2 Tmaphee 0.075 JOE.I) ug/L EPA 3510C1 80814 I 0.075 0.225 11/25/14 11/26/14 51 %o Recovery Q 0/o Recovery Limits 2051-24-3 Surrogate:DCammrMiphenyl 96 lEE,U Limit 46-153 - 077-09-8 Surrogate:Tetechloro-m-xylene % lEE,U Limo 56-153 EPA#FL01227 DOH# E06957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 2 Of 14 -: Palm Beads En:AOmerial La aWlies Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/9/2014 9:24:08AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (959)984-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DP2-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-01 Sampled: 11/21/14 12:45 Matrix: Water Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Water Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q WAS Method DF MDL POL Date IS Analyst Bo6la9 (Sulpmlos) 0.03 JEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/0270C 1 0.03 0.09 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL CMosphoe(GadM) 0.009 JE£,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.309 0.08 11/25/14 148/14 EL DIChlofenPmn 0.02 IEE,U ug/L EPA 351CC/3270C 1 0.02 50 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 3249-90-4 Asoon 0.04 JEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.M 0.1 11/25/14 1125/19 EL 865?0 Anmphos,memo 0.09 JE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/07700 1 0.09 4l 11/25/19 11/25/14 SL 2642-7L-9 Azmphos,Ethyl 0.04 IEE,U u9/L EPA 35100/BDOC 1 0.09 0I 11/25/14 1425/14 51 786-196 Carbopnenothdn 0.04 ]EE,U u9/L EPA 35100/8270C l 0.W 0.1 11/25/14 Ll/25/14 5a 2921-88-2 Chlorpynros 0.04 ]EE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.04 01 It/25/14 11/25/14 51 5598-13-0 Chlorpynios Methyl 0.03 ]EE,V ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.03 0.08 1125/19 11/25/14 EL 56-7241 Coumaphos 0.1 lEE,V ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 01 0.4 11/25/14 1125/14 51 8065483 eem@an 085 0,05 IEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.05 0.2 11/25/14 1125119 51 333-415 Damon 0.24 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C18270C 0.09 0.1 1125114 11/25/14 EL 62-73-7 Ditl,Imws PDVP) 0.01 ]EE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 0.01 009 11/25/14 1125/14 EL 141-66.2 Dicrotophos 0.02 IEE,U u9/l- EPA 3510C/8270C 0.02 0.04 11/415/19 11/25/14 EL 60-515 Dlmeoloate 002 JEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.02 0.05 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 75-30.7 Diosation 003 JEU u9/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.03 0.09 1425/14 11/25/14 EL 298-04-9 D6uubNn 0DE DEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.08 0.2 1475/14 11/25/14 EL 210454-5 EPN 0.03 DEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 0.03 0.09 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 563-12-2 PMon 0.02 JE,U ug/L EPA 35100/52700 0.02 0.08 11/75/14 11/25/14 EL 13194-48-4 Emoprop 0.03 DEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/82700 0.03 0.09 w75/19 11/25/14 EL 52-85-7 Famphur 0.03 lEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/827x 0.03 0.08 11/25/34 11/25/14 EL 122145 Fe.¢mtmen 9.02 IEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/02700 0.02 9n4 11/25/14 11/15/14 IL 115#2 Fevwrotlon 0.005 JEU ug/L EPA 3530C/8270C 0.005 0.02 11/8p4 11/25/19 SL 55-389 FenN,on 0.03 JEU ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.03 0.09 11/25/14 11/25/19 EL 941-22-9 Fonophos 002 JEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.02 0,05 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 21609.90.5 Leptoohos 0.06 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/82700 0.06 0.2 11/25/14 11/25/14 51 III-75.5 Malathion 0.03 JEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/82700 0.03 0.1 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 150-50-5 Merphos 0.08 JEE,U U9/L EPA 35100/827C 0.08 02 I1/8/14 11/25/14 EL 7788-34-7 Mevmphos 002 DEE,U °9/L EPA 3510C/8270C 0.02 0.07 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 6923-22-4 Mmocmrophos 0.007 DEE,U 319/L EPA 3510C/8270C 0.007 0.02 11/25/14 11/25/14 51 300-76-5 Nakd 0.01 DL,U ug/L EPA 3510C/02700 0.01 0.03 11/25/14 Il/25/14 5a 56-38-2 Paramiomebhi 0.1 lEE,U ug/L EPA 351CC/8270C OL 0.3 11/25/14 W25/14 51 298-00-0 Parathion-methyl 0.008 lEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/B270C 0000 0.02 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 798-02-2 Phorate 0.02 RE,U ug/L EPA 35100/B270C 002 0.06 11/15/14 11/25/14 EL 13171-21-6 PhaspMmioon 0.02 DEU ug/L EPA 3510C/82700 0.92 0.05 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 299-849 Fennel 724 IEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 0.09 0.1 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 3 or 14 • -,er— Palm Bead Emirnnmrtal .j' LaboratOrles Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG it: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:24:08AM ATTR: Maria Paltuvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAB: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DP211212014 Lab ID: 0013067-01 Sampled: 11/21/14 12:45 Matrix: Water Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Water Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Ree Qunit: Method QE Ma P01 Date Mg Analyst 22248.79-9 Rrtryhos(Telrachlwmphos) 0.02 LEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8220C 1 0.02 105 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL 3689-24-5 Sulrn/epo 0.03 LEE,U ug/L EPA 3510E/82700 1 0.03 008 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 13101-749 rerbufos 002 LEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/82700 1 0.02 0.06 11/2504 11/25/14 EL 297-97-2 Thmnann(Lnophos) 0.02 LEE,a ug/L EPA 3510/82700 1 0.02 0.07 11/25/I4 11/25/14 EL 74643-46-4 Tmuthou(Protmf°s) 001 LEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/82700 1 0.01 0.09 11/25/14 IIry5/1/4 EL 32796-0 Tnonmmna:e 0.06 LEE,U ug/L EPA 35/00/82700 1 0.06 0.l 11/25/14 11/25/14 EL °7o Recovery Q 0/0 Recovery Limits NA Surrogate:Nrt,°Cenzene45 % LEE,U m 47/131 21-50-8 Sun°gate 2-EIuom1>phenVI % LEE,U Limit 51-134 NA Surrogate:p-Terpheryl414 ok 18£,U Limit 59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis US# Parameter RHS Q Units Method DF MDI. POL Date Date Analyst 7446-382 Arsenic 0.000377 J m0/L EPA 60208 1 0.000377 0.005 11/25114 11/25/14 00 7439-92-1 Lead 0.006 mg/L EPA 60200 1 0.00001 0.005 11/25/14 11/25/14 00 EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#V00000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 4 of 14 - _- Palm Beach Environmental Latnratolies Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:24:08AM ATTR: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DU2-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-02 Sampled: 11/21/14 14:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis ail Parameter Results Q osti Method OF MDL POL Date Mg Analyst 119-84.6 alpWBHC OL3 U ug/k9 EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 56099 gamma-SH6(Llnaanel oak U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 004 O.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 76-44-3 Heptachlor 104 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.04 0.1 Il/16/14 11/26/19 00 309-00-1 Ann 0.03 U 99/0 EPA 3545/6061A 1 0.03 0.1 1426/14 11/26/14 00 319.85-2 EHaEHC 0.05 U ug/k9 EPA 3545/800IA 1 0.05 ..l 11/26/14 1426/14 00 319-86-8 delta-131-1C 004 U ug/kg EPA 3545/3001A 1 0.M 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 JO 1024-52-3 H epdcdlor epoxide 104 U ug/kg EPA 3595/6081A 1 0.04 0-1 11/26/14 11/26/19 OD 95998-8 Endosulfan I 103 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 1 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/19 CD 5566-34-7 gamma-chlordane 0.9 u9/kg EPA 3545/808IA 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 00 5103-21-9 alpha-Ullmtlane 0.6 ug/kg EPA 3915/8081A 1 0.04 0.1 11126/14 11/26/14 CD 72-55-9 4,4-DDE 4.5 ug/k9 EPA 3545/SOBIA 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/16/14 DD 60-5k-1 Dieldun 9.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 1 O.W 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 CD 72-20.3 Emden 0.01 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.01 0.1 11/26/14 11/26114 DO 33213-65-9 Endosulfan II 3.05 U ug/kg EPA 3595/808/4 1 0.05 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 72i48 4,4-000 0.0) U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.02 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 50-29-3 4,4.007 0.01 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/16/14 CC 2421-93-9 EMnn aldehyde 0.W U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 I 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/16/14 DO 1031-02-8 Edmulfan sulfate 0.W U cg/kg EPA 3545/80814 I 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/16/19 DO 72-43-5 MethorychIDr OA U 4y/kg EPA354S/8081A 1 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/16/19 00 94295 Endrin ketone 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 10.03 0.1 11/26/19 11/26/:9 00 PATotal Ullordane 1.5 ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.1 0.1 1126/14 1126/14 CC 6001-39. toxaphene 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/6081A 1 0.1 0.1 1126/14 11/26/14 DO 04 Recovery Q 0/e Recovery Limits 1051-24-3 Surrogate OeachlwohipnenN 132% Lima 41-170 877.09.8 Surrogate.Telrzminmm>Nene 198% Emit 40-175 EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 5 of l4 - n Palm Beach Ervimnmertal Latc atones Mc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/9/2019 9:24:08AM ATTR: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (959)484-8500 FAX: (954)489-5196 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 215c Street Community Description: DU2-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-02 sampled: 11/21/14 14:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS ft Parameter Results Q psti Method DF MDL POI gate Date Analyst Bolster, (Sulpmhs) 0.00251 388,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00251 0.00754 11/28/14 11(29/14 SL Omtomhas(Oodnn) 0.000602 PEE,a mg/kg EPA 3545/62/0C 1 0/000602 000161 11/29/14 11/29/14 SL Dltlimkothioo 0.00230 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/02702 1 0.00230 0.00689 0428/14 11/29/14 SL 3244-90-4 Aspen 0.00244 HE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00244 0.00731 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 06400 A7mphos,MetMI 0.00350 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00350 0.01050 11/26/19 11/29/14 5L 2642.91-9 Az ophos,Ethyl 0.00290 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00290 0.00871 11/28/19 11/29/:4 Si_ 78619-6 Cartophennhon 0.00326 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00326 0:30978 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 2921-88-2 Chlomyrfos 0.00143 HE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00143 0.00430 1100/14 11/29/14 SL 5598-13-0 Chlorpenros methyl 0.00213 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00213 0.00639 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 56-72-4 Coomapnos 0.00641 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00641 0.01920 11/20/14 11/29/14 SL 8065-48-3 Demeton 0&5 0.0053D IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00530 0.01590 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 333-41-5 Dannon 0.00144 PEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000144 00433 0628/14 11/29/14 SL 62.73.7 Dlchlorvon(OOVP) 0.00186 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00186 C.)0558 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 14146-2 DIcrIXCpnos 0.000319 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000319 0.000956 11/28/14 11/19/14 SL 60-51-5 Dimethm@ 0.000816 PEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 9.000816 0.30245 11/28/14 11/29/19 SL 78-343 Diorath,on 0.00233 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00233 0.30700 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 298-%-4 Dlsulfetan 0.00592 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C I 0.00592 031780 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 2104545 EPN 0.00266 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/OPCC 1 0.00266 0.00796 11/25/14 11/29/14 5L 563-12-2 Ethan 0.00242 JEE,U mg/kg EPA/545/0225 1 0.00242 0.00725 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 13194-48-4 Ethopmp 0.00213 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 1545/8270C 1 0.00213 0.00638 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 52-85-7 Famohur 0.00255 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 1545/82700 1 0.00255 0.00765 11/28114 11/29/14 521 122-14-5 Fenitmmirn 0,00110 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 15451827th 1 0.00150 0.00449 110844 11/29/14 SL 115-90-2 FenwlfOMinn 0.00959 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/13270C 1 0.00059 0.00172 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 55-38-9 renmlon 000227 WE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C I 0.00227 0.00680 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 944-22-9 FanopMs 0.00115 JOE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/B270C 1 0.00118 0.00353 0420/14 11/29/14 A 21609305 Lep10013 0.00413 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8278C 1 0.00413 0.01240 11/25/14 11/29/14 51 121-75-5 Male than 0.00198 ]EE,u mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00190 0.00594 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 150-50-5 reemhos 0.00758 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/3270C 1 0.00758 0.02170 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 7786-34.7 Mevmphos 0.000916 1EE,U mg/kg PA 3545/8270C 1 0.000916 0.00275 11/20/14 11/29/14 SL 6923-22-4 Monccrpbphas 0.000318 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82708 1 0000318 0000953 11/28/14 11/29/14 5L 300965 Naim 0.000769 IE_,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0900769 0.00231 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 56-00-2 Parathion-ethyl 0.00967 IEE,U mg/kg EPA/545182700 1 0.00967 0.02900 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 290-0C-0 arzmiommetyl 0.00189 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00189 0.00587 11/28/14 11/29/14 51 29802-2 Phorate 0.00270 2EE,U mg/kg EPA 1545/0270C 1 0.00270 0.00810 11/28/14 11/29/14 51 13171-21-6 Phmplaminm 0000487 2F£,U mg/kg EPA 3545/62700 1 0.000487 0.00146 11/28/14 11/29/14 EL 299-84-3 P0n0e1 0.00299 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 1545/02708 1 0.00249 0.00747 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC #V00000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33909, phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 6 of 14 Palm Brats ErMiidynertal e. Laboratories lnc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013061 229 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 924:08AM AITN: Maria F99991 PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)48413500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DU2<1212014 Lab ID: 0013067-02 Sampled: 11/21/19 19:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CASE Parameter Results Qntl_(1'i Method Qf M 4 Date Date Analyst 22248-79-9 Snmphos(Tetraehlorvinphos) 000172 JEE,V mg/kg EPA 3595/82700 1 000127 0.00361 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 3689-24-5 Sulkrepp 0.00273 JEE,V mg/kg EPA 3595/827C 1 0.00273 0.00819 11/18/14 11/29/14 SL 13071-79-9 Terbufos 0.00130 JEE,0 mums EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00230 0.00690 11/28/14 11/29/19 SL 29797-2 Thionaim(Zlnophus) 000220 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00220 0.00662 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 34643-469 Tokuhim(ProNIONE) 0.40E-5 JEE,V mg/kg EPA 3595/8270C 1 640E-5 0000253 11/78/14 11/29119 SL 32718-0 TntlAoronate 0.00307 JEE,V mg/k9 EPA 3595/82700 1 0.00307 0-00920 1128/19 11/29/19 SL a/o Recovery Q el Recovery Limits NA Surrogate.Nitrobenzene-d5 M lEE,u Limr 47-131 321-60-8 Surrogate.arluorohi pt ny1 % lEE,u Limc 51-134 NA surrogate:p-Ta rphenvrd 14 % /°E.I/ Lim!59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q Qg& Method DF MDL 4 IS Date Anelvst 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5.75 mg/kg Dry EPA 60208 1 0.003 0200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PLS 7439-924 Lead 25.4 mg/kg dry EPA 60208 1 0.007 0200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PL5 Percent Dry Weight Extraction Analysis CA@-# Parameter Results Q Meats Method Qf MQS EQS Date pate Analyst NA •M Solids 100 % Calculation I 1.0 10 11/23/19 11/26/14 AT EPA#FL01227 DOH#E86957 SFWMD#98141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach,FL 33909,phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 7 of 19 _:7fir__ Palm Beeth Envircmlertal laborebnes Inc. c.Y;Telli 4-I e. 1 r3 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2019 9:29:08AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAx: (959)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP3-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-03 Sampled: 11/21/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081.A Extraction Analysis EAS Parameter Resslts9 Q Units MMhotl DF MDL POL Dg Date Analyst 319-846 alpha-BHC 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 1 DA 11/26/14 11/26/14 D.C. 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/308IA 1 0.04 01 11/26/14 11/26/14 CO 76.44.8 Heptachlor 3.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 O.U4 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 309-00-2 Awn Oda U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.0) 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 319-55-7 beta-OHO 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0-05 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 31986-8 delta-BHC 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/0081A 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 959-98-8 EndosulhnI 203 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 5566-34-7 gamma-Chlordane 1.1 ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A I OW0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 0.8 ug/kg EPA 3545/80811 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/1+ DO 72-55-9 4,4-DDE 3A ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DO 60-57-1 Dieldnn 104 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 O.O4 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 on 72-20-8 Endrin O.m U ug/kg EPA)545/80814 1 0.01 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 332 -9 Endcmlhn II 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.05 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 72-54-8 4,4-DOD 0.07 U ug/kg EPA 3545 SOSIA 1 0.07 0.1 1126/14 11/26/14 DD 50-243 4,I-CDT 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 1 0.03 0.1 I1/26/14 11/26/14 DD 7421-93-4 Endno aldehyde 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/BOBIA 1 0.01 0.1 11/26/14 II/26/14 DO 1031-07-8 EndosUhn sulfate 0.04 U Ug/kg EPA 3545/8001A I 0.04 0.1 11/226/14 1126/14 DO I2<35 Memorywor 0.1 U Ug/kg EPA 3545/8031A I 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 53494-70-5 Endnn Ketone 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8601A I0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO ex Total Chlordane 1.9 ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.1 01 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 8001-35-2 rOaaphene 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A I P1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD %D Recovery Q /Recovery Limits 2051-24-3 Surrogate'.Decachlorod ronerM 132% Lima 41-170 - - - 877a9-6 S(.oegate.Te nMoro-m.rylere Ill Oma 40-175 EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 8 of 19 _-et_ Palm BeachEr viromiorial y Beach Laboratories Irc. 6 ` filiti' CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sdences LOG#: 00131)67 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/9/2019 9:24:08AM Ann: Maria Paituvi PROJECT #: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (959)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP3-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-03 Sampled: 11/21/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CASH Parameter Results Q Units Mahod DF MDL P0L Date Data Analvn Bcstar, (Sulproros) 0.00251 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270C 1 0.00251 0.00754 1128/14 1129/14 EL Cmloxohos(CIMrm) 0.000502 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C I 0.000602 0.00181 1120/14 11/29/14 EL DichIorennion 0.00230 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C I 0.00230 0 00589 11128/14 11/29/14 EL 3244.99-4 Aspen 0.00244 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/02700 1 0.00214 0 00731 11/28/14 11/29/14 3L 86-50-0 Azmphos.Methyl 0.00350 JEE,J mg/kg EPA 3545/0270C 1 200350 0.01050 1128/14 11/29/14 EL 2642.71.9 Azmphos,Ethyl 0.00290 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00290 0.00871 11/26/14 11/29/14 a 706-195 Czroo nenothion 0.00326 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270E I 3.00326 0.00978 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 292198-2 Chlormnfos 0.00143 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00143 0.00930 11/28/14 11/29/14 Si 5598-11-0 CMo,pyrilos Methyl 0.00213 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270CC 1 0.00213 0.00639 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 56-72-4 Coumaphos 0.00001 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/02700 1 0.00641 0.01920 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 8065-48-3 Demeton 0&S 0.00530 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270.' 1 0.00530 0.01500 11/28/14 11/19/14 EL 33241-5 Dlazmon 0.00144 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00144 0.00933 11/28/14 11/29/14 EL 62-73-7 DEchlpmos(ODVPI 0.00186 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 354E/8270C 1 0.00106 0.00558 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 191-66-2 Ommtophos 0.000119 ME,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000319 0.000956 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 6051/5 0,methoate 0.000815 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000816 0.00245 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 78-34-2 O,o athion 0.00233 IEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00233 0.00700 11/28/14 11/29/14 EL 298-04-4 Olsulmlon 0.00592 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00592 0:31780 11/28/14 11/29/14 EL 2104.6-S EPN 0.00266 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8279C I 0.00266 030796 1120/14 11/29/14 EL 563-12-2 Ethiom 0.00241 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8279C I 0.00242 C.00725 11/28/14 11/29/14 EL 13194-48-4 Ethoprop 0.00213 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 I 0.00213 0.30638 0028/19 11/29/14 5L 5295-7 Eanphur 0.00255 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00255 0.00765 11/20/14 11/29/14 5L 122-14-5 F804,99667 011065 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 I 0.00150 0.00449 11/20/14 11/39/14 SL 115-90-2 Fensullothwn 0.00059 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00059 0.00177 11/28/14 1129/11 S1 55-38-9 Fenthion 0.00227 IEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00227 0.00680 11/28/14 11/29/14 SI. 944-22-9 Fommhos 0.00118 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00116 000351 11/28/14 11/29/14 a 21699905 Leo ophas 000413 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00413 0.01240 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 121-755 Malathion 0.00190 JEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00190 0.00594 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 150-50-5 Merphos 0.00758 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00750 0.02270 11/28/14 1109/14 SL 7786-34-7 Memnohos 0.000916 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000916 0.00275 11/20/14 1470/14 EL 6921-22-4 Monocmbphos 0.000318 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/52700 1 0000318 0.000953 11/28/14 1129/14 SL 300-765 Naled 0.000769 JEE.I. mg/kg EPA 1545/82700 1 0.000769 000231 1129/14 1129/14 EL 56-38-2 Parathion-ethyl 0.00967 3EE.9 mg/kg EPA 3545/3270C I 0.00967 0.02900 11/20/14 11/29/14 EL 298-00-0 Parathion-merN 0.00189 IEE.0 mg/kg EPA 3545/0270C 1 0.00189 0.00567 11/26/14 11/29/14 EL 298-02-2 Phorate 0.00270 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00270 0.00810 11/20/14 11/29/14 51 13171-21-6 ohosphamidon 0.000487 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82730 1 0000487 0.00346 :1/28/14 11/29/14 EL 29984-3 Ponnel 0.00249 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/82700 1 0-00249 0.00747 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 9 04 14 _-may Palm Beach Environmerial Laboratones Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:24:08AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (954)489-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP3-11212014 Lab ID: 00130674)3 Sampled: 11/21/19 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS# parameter Results Q }IDIS£ Method DF MDI. POI, Date Date ALUM 22248-79.9 SUmphoa(T¢Rxnl°MnphOt) 0.00122 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00122 0.60367 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 3689-24-5 Suifolepp 0.00273 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/B2709 1 0.00273 0.)0819 11/28/14 11/29/14 S. 13071-79-9 Teiufos 0.00230 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270E 1 0.00230 0.30690 11/28/14 11/29/14 51 297-97-2 IDlonaiin(Zinogge) 0.00220 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270E 1 0.00220 OJ0662 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 3464346-4 Tokulh,on fmlh,ofos) B.40E-5 lEE,U mg/kg EkA 3545/8270[ 1 5.406-5 0.000253 1168/14 11/29/14 A 327-98.0 Tnchloronee 0.00307 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00307 000920 11/28/14 11/29/14 A AA Recovery Q °/o Recovery Limits NA Surt°gate'.NrtrohenxneES % IEE,U Int 47-131 31460-8 Surrogate 2-Fluoroblphenyl % JEE,U Unit 51-134 NA Surrogate:P-Teyhenyl d:4 % IEE,U Unit 54135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis CAL Parameter Results 2 Onifs Method Q MDL POL Date Date Analyst 440-3a-1 ArseniC 5.52 mg/kg dry EPA 60208 1 0.203 0.200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PLS 743392-3 Lead 25.5 mg/kg dry EPA 6020B 1 0.907 0.200 11/02/14 12/03/14 PLS Percent Dry Weight Extraction Analysis CASA Parameter Results Q 206E Method DE MDL EQL Date Da Analyst NA urs Solis 100 96 Calculation I I0 1.0 11/23/14 11/26/14 AT EPA# FL01227 DOH#E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 10 of 14 Palm Beach Emlmnmertal L3tloratones IFC. `z i161eq. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2019 9:24:08AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)989-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP4-11212019 Lab ID: 0013067-04 Sampled: 11/21/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled 8y: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis CMS Parameter Results Q 1LDlII Method DF MDL POL age Date Analyst 31304-6 alpha-OHC 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.03 3.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 58-89-9 gammeBHC(Lindane) 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/6081A 1 o04 11 11/26/14 11/26/14 CO 76.44-8 Heptachlor 004 U ug/kg EPA 3545/6061A 1 0.04 11 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 309-00-2 AIOnn 0.03 U ug/6g EPA 3545/808N 1 0.03 0.l 1426/14 11/25/14 DD 319-85-7 beta-BHC 0-03 U 1g/0 EPA 3345/008IA 1 0.05 0.1 11/76/14 1426/14 DO 319869 deIta6HC 0.04 U ug/k) EPA 3545/8001A 1 0.08 0.1 11/26/14 11/25/14 00 1024.57-1 Hetachlorodde 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/30814 I 0.04 0.1 y26/14 11/26/14 00 959988 Endosullan I 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80614 I0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 5566-34-7 gamma-Chlordane 0.9 ug/kg EPA 3545/80014 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 5103-11-9 alpha-CIIIordne 0.3 ug/kg EPA 3545/881A 10.04 102014 11/26/14 DD 72-55-9 4,4-00E 1.5 u9/0 EPA 3545/80816 1 0.04 0.1 11/2604 11/26/14 DD 6057-1 DielOnn 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/00814 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 72-209 Endrin 0.01 U ug/kg EPA 3545/0061A 1 0.01 0.1 11/26/14 1926/14 DO 332/3-659 Endowllan 11 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3545/0081A 1 0.05 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 72-54-8461-DDC 0.07 U ug/kg EPA 3545/0081A I 007 0.1 11/26/14 11/2014 DO 50293OT 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 I 0.03 0.1 11/2014 11/26/14 00 742193-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 _04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 00 1031-070 Endamllan sulfate 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 I 554 0.1 116014 11/26/14 DO 72-43-5 MCLwrychbr 0.3 U uykg EPA 3545/8081A I 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 53494-70-5 Endnn Ketone 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808/4 10.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO NA Mal chlordane OJ cg/kg EPA 3545/80814 I 0.1 0.1 11/26/19 11/26/14 DO 801-35-2 Toeapnene 0.1 0 ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 080 Recovery Q %Recovery Limits 2051-24-3 Surrcgatee Decaetiioroeiphenyl 136% Limit 41-170 - 877-090 Sw0o.3ate:Teoachloramrylene 102% Limit 49-175 EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#98191 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 11 of 14 • _:mfir- Palm Beach Ervironmereal Laboratories Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:24:08AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT ft: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)489-8500 FAX: (954)489-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP4-11212014 Lab ID: 0013067-09 Sampled: 11/21/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/1416:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CM# Parameter Res 11 Q IQ jts Method 1LF MDL POL QBte Mg A4n Iy1S adsta,,(Sulpmbs) 0.01251 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/5270C 1 0.00251 0.00754 11/25/14 11/29/14 A CrotevpMs(CIWrn) 0.000602 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000602 0.00181 11/28/14 11/29/14 51 O'M1brention 600230 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00230 0.00689 I1/28/14 11/29/14 SL 324490-4 Aspon 0.00244 ,EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00219 0.00731 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 85-504 Azinplkos.Methyl 0.00350 :EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/827% 1 0-0353 0.0105C 1123/14 11/29/19 SL 2642-719 KmpMS.Ethyl 0.00290 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/827% 1 0.00293 0.00871 11/28/14 15/29/14 SL 706-19.6 Carbophenothion 0.00326 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00326 0.00978 11/28/14 1829/14 Si_ 2921-80-2 Tbry1-51505 0.00143 7EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00143 0.00430 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 5590-13-0 CM176994os Methyl 0.00233 14,U mg/kg EPA 3545/BDOC 1 0.00213 0.00639 11/28/19 11/29/14 5L - 56-72-0 Ccumaphos 000641 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/8270C 1 0.00641 0.01920 11/18/14 11/29/19 IL 8065-45-3 Cemeton 0645 0.00530 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/8270C 1 0.00530 0.01590 11128114 11/29/14 SL 333-41-5 Dannon 0 00:44 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00149 0.00433 11/28/14 11/29/14 5t 62-73-7 Dichlorvos iDDVP) 0.00185 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00186 0.00558 11/28/14 11/29/14 51 741-66.2 DlcmNphos 0.000319 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000319 0.000956 11/28/14 11/29/14 IL 60 519 Dimetoa a 0.000816 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000816 0.00245 11/28/14 11/29/14 IL 78-34-1 Dioaation 000233 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545 1 8270C 1 0.06233 0.00700 11/28/74 11/29/14 SL 298.04-4 Disulfoton 000592 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00592 0 01753 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 2104615 EPN 0.00266 lEE,U 059/07 EPA 3545/82700 1 000260 0.0[796 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 563-12-2 P Mon 000242 1EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/02760 1 C.00242 0.00725 11128/14 11/29/14 SL 13194-48-4 EthWmp 000213 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.20213 0.00638 11/28114 11/29/14 Si_ 52$3-7 Famphur 0.00255 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00255 0.10755 11/28/19 11/29/14 SL 122-14-5 Fenitmthmn 000150 1EE,a mg/kg EPA 3545/92700 1 0.00150 0.60449 11/28/19 1129/4 59 115-90-2 Fens/lobilon 0.00059 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00059 0.00177 11/28/14 11/29/14 IL 55-38-9 rviM ion 0.00227 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0 00227 0.00680 11/28/14 11/29/14 5L 944221 FonopM1as 000118 ]EE91 mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00118 0.00353 11/28/14 11/29/14 A 2160990-5 Leptophos 0.00413 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00413 0 01240 1108/14 11/29/14 SL 121-755 M1hkmion 0.00198 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/5270C 1 0.00198 000594 11/28/14 11/79/19 IL 150.50.5 Merphos 0.00758 lEE,U mg/kg EPA3545/8270C 1 1.00758 0.02270 11/28/14 11/29/19 IL 7786-34-7 Memnphos 0.000916 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000916 0.00275 11/28/14 11/79/14 IL 6923-229 Monocrolcphos 0000318 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/5270C 1 0.000318 0000953 11/28/14 11/29/14 IL 300-764 Naled 0900769 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/827.X 1 0.000769 0.00231 11/28/14 11/19/14 55 5638-2 Paralkion-ethyl 0.00957 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/827X 1 0.00967 0.02900 11/28/14 11/29/14 521 298-00-0 ParalrOnmeflyl 0.00189 1EE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/8270C 1 0.00189 0.00567 11/20/14 11/29/14 IL 298-02-2 PM1orate 0.00270 IEE,1.1 mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00270 0.00810 11/25/14 11/29/14 Si_ 13171-215 Phospnamiclark 0.000487 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0000487 0.00146 11/28/14 11/29/14 s1- 299-84-3 Rmnel 0.00249 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/62700 1 0.00299 0.00747 11128/14 6029/14 sL EPA# FL01227 DOHA E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 12 of 14 Palm Beat Ers4mnmerial f LatoratOlieS Inc. I CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sdences LOG#: 0013067 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21619 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:29:08AM AJTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 1-0002-023 PHONE: (959)489-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP4-11212019 Lab ID: 0013067-04 Sampled: 11/2111400:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q Units Method DF poi Dote Date AAn 1y£t 22248799 St mp nm(Tetraarvorvmgpo .110122 JEE U mg/kg EPA 3545 182700 1 000122 0.00367 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 3689-21-5 Sulroteoo 0.00273 3EE.U mg/kg EPA 1545/82700 1 000273 007819 11/20/14 11,29/14 SL 13071-79-9 Terbulos 000130 IEE.U mg/k9 EPA 1545/8270C 1 0.00230 007690 11/28/14 11/29/14 SL 297-97-2 Tdone:m¢moehosl 0.00220 3EE.U mg/kg EPA 1545/8270C 1 000220 000562 11128/14 11/29/14 SL 34643-46-4 Tokuthion(P80[h101os1 5.40E-5 3EE U mg/kg EPA 3.645/82705 1 8.90E-5 0.000253 11/29/14 £1129/14 58 327-93-0 TPminronale o 30307 3L,a mg/kg EPA 3545/82705 1 0.00307 0-00920 11/29/14 11129/14 51. 0/0 Recovery Q %Recovery Limits NA Surrogate:rvi1robenzene-d5 % IEE,u Lima 7-ill 32:-60-8 Surrogate:DFluorodphenVI Po IEE,U Um:51-134 NA Surrogate:p-TemnenyI.014 38 lEE,U Limn 59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis GS# Parameter Results Q Units Method DF MDL P01 Date Date Analyst 96-5 Arsenic 5.49 mg/kg Cry EPA 60209 1 0.003 0.200 12/02/14 12/03/19 P1.5 7439-92-1 Lead 35.1 mg/kg an? EPA 60206 I 5307 0.200 0002/14 12/03/14 P15 Percent Dry Weight Extraction Analysis CM* Parameter Eesgltl QUnits Method DF tl01 POL Date Date AnaIyst NA W Solids too % Cakulalun 1 1.0 1.0 1183/14 11/26/14 AT EPA# FL01227 DOH#E86957 SFWMD#98191 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach,FL 33409, phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 13 01 10 Palm Beech Eminarnertal j' Laboratories Inc. Notes and Definitions u Arsine ind idel in the analysis,but not detected IEE Aralvsll peformed by Florida Environmental cem Es6OO6 EPA# FL0122] DOH#E86957 SFWMD#98191 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 14 or 14 . _:-�. Palm Beach Environmental i - -- ,y Laboratories Inc. v poir o e Maria Paituvr December 04, 2014 E Sciences Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 (954)484-8500 LOG #: 0013068 Enclosed is the laboratory report for your project. All results meet the requirements of the NELAC standards. Please note the following: (1) The samples were received as stated on the chain of custody, correctly labeled and at the proper temperature unless otherwise noted. The results contained in this report relate only to the items tested or to the samples as received by the laboratory. (2) This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. Any anomalies are noted in the case narrative. (3) Results for all solid matrices are reported in dry weight unless otherwise noted. (4) Results for all liquid matrices are analyzed as received in the laboratory unless otherwise noted. (5) Samples are disposed of within 30 days of their receipt by the laboratory. (6) A statement of Qualifiers is available upon request. (7) Certain analyses are subcontracted to outside NELAC certified laboratories and are designated on your report. (8) Precision &Accuracy will be provided when clients require a measure of estimated uncertainty. (9) The issuance of the final Certificate of Analysis takes precedence over any previous Preliminary Report Preliminary Data should not be used for regular purposes. Authorized signature(s) is provided on final report only Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this report. Sincerely, kj,r. ` Pamela Shore QA Officer EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 1 or 14 -: Palm Bead.Eroitanmertal y Latora10nes Inc CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COCA: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM ATrN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT St: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)48441500 FAX: (959)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DP1-11202019 Lab ID: 0013068-01 sampled: 11/20/14 13:45 Matrix: Water Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/1416:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis CASA Parameter Results Q Units Method DF MDL POL 4Ate Date Analyst 319046 alpha-BHC 0.009 ]EEU ug/L EPA 3510C/80814 1 0.004 10Il 11/25/14 1126/14 SL 58899 gamma-BHC 111,1EE 0.004 ]EE,II ug/L EPA 3510C/00814 1 0.004 0.011 11/E5/14 1126/14 SL ]6 448 Heptachlor 0.006 ]EE,II ug/L EPA 3510C/00814 1 0.00 0.017 11/25/14 1126/14 SL 309-00-2 4145/5/ 1004 IEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/00814 1 0.009 0.011 1125µ4 11/26/14 61 319-85-7 betaHHC 3.004 3E1 U ug/L EPA 3510C 50814 1 0.0E4 0.013 11/25/I4 1125/14 SL 319868 dettaEHC 3.004 3E1 U 1190. EPA 35100/808/4 1 /1014 0.012 1125/14 11/2114 SL 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.004 3E1 U ug/L EPA 35100/50834 1 0.004 0.611 11/25/14 112114 SL 959-988 Enoosulhn l 0.004 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/80814 1 0.004 0.014 11/25/14 11/15/14 SL 5566-34-7 gamma-011ordane 0.020 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8081A I 0.020 0.060 1125/14 1120/14 SL 5103-719 alpha-Chlordane 0.020 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8081A 1 0.020 0.060 11/25/14 11/1114 SL 72-55-9 4A-DOE 0.005 Iff,U ug/L EPA 3510C/80814 1 0.005 0.013 11/15/14 112114 SL 00.5]-1 Dlelann 300075 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8081A 1 10005 0.002 1125114 11/26/14 SL 2-2}6 Endrin 0.004 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/80814 1 0.004 0.013 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 33713/59 Enaosulhn n 0.006 IEE U ug/1 EPA 35100/8081A 1 0.006 0.017 11/25/14 1126/14 SL 72-54-8 4,4100 0.002 lEE,U 49/1 EPA 35160/8081A 1 0.002 0.007 1125/14 1126/14 SL 50-29-3 4,4-DOT 0.004 3EE,.1 ug/L EPA 35100/80014 1 0.004 0.013 11/15/14 11/26/14 SL 7421-93-4 Endrin amehyde 0.003 3EE,V ug/L EPA 35100/80814 I 0.003 0.140 1126/14 1126/14 SL 1031-07-3 Enoosulhn suPate 0.003 lEE,U ug/L EPA 35100/80814 1 0.003 0.008 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL 72-43-5 Methorycnmr 0.005 3EE,U .1/L EPA 3510C1 80814 1 0.005 0.315 11/25/14 112114 SL 5349-70-5 Enenn Ketone 0.003 3EE,U ug/L EPA 35100/00814 1 0.003 0.010 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL NA Total at/Am 0.020 3E5,U ug/L EPA 35100/81814 1 0.020 0.000 11/25/14 11/2114 SL 8001-35.2 Tuupnene 0.075 IEE,U 094- EPA 3510C 8001A 1 0.075 0.225 11/25/14 11/26/14 SL WO Recovery Q O/o Recovery Limits 2051-233 Surrogate.0ecarnbmbl pnenvl °h lEE,u unit 077.09.8 Surrogate'TetmNloro-m-xylene 1 IEE,U Limt 56-153 EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#98141 PBC#VE000001E0E3 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 2 of 14 - re Palm Beach Eivimrumrtal Y LatordWnes ire. f CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/9/2019 9:38:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (959)484-8500 FAX: (959)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DP1-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-01 Sampled: 11/20/1413:45 Matrix: Water Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Water Extraction Analysis fASt Parameter Results 2 US Method 2 MDL Pm Date Patg Analyst SSW. (Sulprofos) 0.009 3EE,U uS/L EPA 35100/82700 1 0.309 0.1 11125/14 112104 SL Cmmr nes(Going) 0.009 ICE.U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.309 0.03 11125/14 11/25/14 SL Ccrvg2n:higr o02 ICE.0 ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.02 0.08 11125/14 11/25119 SL GuMnn gEE.U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 5.0 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 3244-90-4 Aspan 0.04 IF£,U 11932 EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.09 0.1 1125/14 1125/14 SL 86-53-0 Azmpho4 Merry: 0.04 lEE,U ugh EPA 35100/82700 1 0.09 0.1 1125/14 11/25114 5L 2642-71-9 Azlnphos,Ethyl 0.04 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.04 0.1 11/25/14 11/25119 SL 706-19-6 Carbophenothion 0.04 JEE.U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.04 0.1 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 2921-88-2 ChlorMT0s 0.04 JEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.09 0.1 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 559813-0 CMarpyrtlos Methyl 0.01 lEE,u 119/L EPA 3510C/82700 1 0.03 008 1165/14 11/25/14 SL 56-72-1 Coumagms 0.1 JEE U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.1 0.4 1125/14 11125/14 SL 8065>8-3 DenletOn o&S 0.05 J.E,U ugh EPA 3510C/82700 a 0.05 02 1125/14 11/25/14 5L 333-41-5 ommnon 0.04 JEE.U ug/L EPA 3510CI 8270C 1 0.14 0.1 1125/14 11/25/14 SL 62-73-7 achlorves(DOVP) 0.01 JEE.U ug/L EPA 3SIOC/8270C 1 0.01 0.04 11/25/19 11/25/14 SL 14145-2 OomNOhos 0.02 JEE.U ug/L EPA 351OC/8270C 1 0.02 0.04 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 60-51-5 Oimethoate 0.02 JEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.02 0.05 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 78-34-2 Oioratlon 0.03 JEE,U ug/L EPA 3510[/8270C 1 0.03 0.09 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 29809-4 0611hbn 0.08 JEE U ug/L EPA 3510C/827% 1 0-OB 0.2 1105/14 11/25/14 SL 2104-64-5 EPN 0.03 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8271C 1 0.03 0.09 11/25/19 11/25/14 SL 563-12-2 Etnion 0.02 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/827CC 1 0.02 0.08 11/25/14 11/25114 SL 13194-48-4 MWmO 0.03 lEE,U ugh EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.94 0.09 11/25/14 11/25/19 SL 52-88-7 Famhur 0.03 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.03 0.08 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 122-14.5 Fenitro(Man 0.02 ]EE,U ugh EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.02 0.09 11/25/19 11/25/14 SL 115-90-2 FersulfOthico 0.005 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.005 0.02 1125/14 11/25/14 SL 55-38-9 Fenthme 0.03 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/82700 1 0.03 0.09 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 994-22-9 fonophos 0.02 JEE,U 1198 EPA 3510C/82700 1 0.02 0.05 11/25114 1423/14 Si 21609-90-5 Leptopnos 0.06 IEE.U ug/L EPA 3310C/8270C 1 0.06 33 1125/14 11/25/14 51/ 121-75-5 Malmhion 0.03 lEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270E 1 0.03 3.1 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 150-50.5 MeryMs 0.08 lEE.U ug/L EPA 3510E/8270E 1 0.08 3.2 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 7786-34-7 Memnphos 0.02 IEE U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.02 0.07 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 6923-22-1 Monocotophos 0.007 ICE,U U9/L EPA 3510C/527% 1 0.007 3,02 11/25/14 1125/14 SL 30145-5 Nalel 0.01 JEE U ug/- EPA 3510C/827% 1 0.01 0.03 1165/14 11125/14 SL 56-38-2 Parathion-ethyl 0.1 ICE,U u9/1 EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.1 0.3 1125/14 11/25/14 St 298-00-0 Pa2mionmenyl 0.008 IEE U ug/L EPA 3510C/82700 1 0.008 002 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 298-02-2 Prorate 0.02 lEE,U Ig/L EPA3510C/82700 1 0.02 0.06 1125114 11/25/14 SL 13171-21-6 Phos0hamaon 0.02 JEE,U OWL EPA 3510C/82700 1 0.02 0.05 11/15/14 11/25/14 SL EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach,FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax:(561)689-6702 Page 3 of 19 _-e Palm Beach Enyimtmcrtal _ f' Labomtones Inc. 1'i CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG it: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM Arm Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 1-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAR: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DP1-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-01 sampled: 11/20/14 13:45 Matrix: Water Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Water Extraction Analysis US# Parameter Results Q Units Method DF MDL POI 261.4 Date Analyst 299-84-3 Ronnet 0.04 3EE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C l 0.04 OL 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 22248-79-9 S11rophos2Tftm[Morvingps) 0d2 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C I 327CC 1 0.02 0.05 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 160424-5 SulIctepp 0.03 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 003 0.08 11125/14 11/25/14 SL 107-443 TEPP(Tetraethyl Pyrophm'protel lEE.U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 5.0 1l/25114 11/25/14 SL 13071-79-9 Terhuros 0.02 3E£,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270 1 0.02 0.06 11125/14 11/25/14 SL 297.97-2 Thonaxm(zlmphm) 0.02 LE,U ug/L EPA 35100/8270C 1 0.02 0.07 11/25/14 11/25/14 SL 34643-46-4 15okuui0n(Promioros) 0-01 IEE.U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.01 0.04 11125/14 11/25/14 SL 52-68-6 Trichlorfon IEE,u u8/- EPA 3510C/8270C 1 5.0 11/25/14 11/25/14 a 327-98-0 Tnmioronate 0.06 IEE,U ug/L EPA 3510C/8270C 1 0.36 0.2 11/25/14 1105/14 a 0//Recovery Q 6 Recovery Limits NA Surrogate.Nitrobenzene-de W 355.U em,47131 321-60-8 Surrogate.2-FIuorohipreny( 84 lEE.u Lull:51-134 NA Surrogate.p-Temhenyl-d14 94 IEE a unto 59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q 211114 Method DF MDL Ea Date Dae Analyst 1440d8-2 Arsenic 0.0083 mg/L EPA 60208 1 0.000377 0.005 11/25/14 11/25/14 00 143942-1 Lead 0.006 mg/. EPA 6020B 1 0.00001 0.005 11/25/14 11/25/14 00 EPA#FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#98191 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33909,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 4 of 14 . - Palm Beech Environmental ;Y Laboratories Inc CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT it: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAx: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DU1-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-02 Sampled: 11/20/14 15:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis US# Parameter Results 4 Units Method DF MDL L4 Date Da[e Analyst 319-84-6 alpheBHC 0.03 U I15/4g EPA 3%5/80014 1 0.03 0.1 11/16/14 1126/14 DD 58-99-9 gamma-sec(bndane) 009 U 92129 EPA 3545/5001A 1 0.04 0.1 11/96/14 1/1/26/19 DO 76-44-0 Heptathiar L04 U 59/29 EPA 3145/800101 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/19 11/26/14 DD 30900-2 NOM 0.03 U ky/kg EPA 3%5/8I01A 1 8.03 0.1 1425/19 11/25/54 DO 319-857 EftaeHC 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3345/80814 1 0.05 0.1 1125/14 1166/14 DD 31986-6 detlBHC 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3595/80814 1 0.0^ 0.1 11/25/54 £1/25/14 OD 102443 Heptachlor epoxide 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80819 1 0.04 0.1 11/25/54 4126/14 DD 959-06.8 Endosulranl 0,03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80010. 1 0.03 al 1l26/I4 11/26/14 OD 5566-39-7 gamma-ChINane 1.1 ug/kg EPA 3545/&0810. I 0.04 0.1 1166/14 11/26/14 DO 5103-71-9 alpha-Chlordane 0.6 ug/kg EPA 3545/80010. I 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 00 72-55-9 4,4-DDE 6.7 ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.04 0.1 41/26/I4 11/26/14 00 6091 DrelOnn 0.09 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80014 1 0.04 O.l 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 22-20-5 Endnn 0.01 U ug/kg EPP 3545/80814 1 0.01 0.1 11126/14 11/26/14 DO 33213-65-9 Endosulan 11 0.05 U vc/kg EPA 3545/8081A 1 0.05 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 W 22-59-0 4,4-000 0.07 U ug/kg EPA 3545/00814 1 0.0) 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 50-293 4,4-DDT 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A I 0.03 01 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 1421.93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.04 U 4% EPA 3545/808/4 I 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 103607-8 EndISulhn sulfite 0.04 U Igpg EPA 3545/008/4 I 0.09 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 OD 72-43-5 Mtt omchbr 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/00814 I 01 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 53494-70-5 Endrin FNone 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/008/4 1 0.03 0.1 1126/14 11/26/14 NA Total Chlordane 11/ ug/kg EPA 3545/30814 1 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 800635-2 Tomphene 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD n/o Recovery Q %Recovery Limits 2051-24-3 Surrogate-Ottachio o iphen4 146% Limr 41-170 877.09-0 Surrogate.Tei mchloro-m-,4ene 112% on%40-175 EPA#FL01222 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 5 of 19 --er_ Palm Seech Envimctnartal tato stories Inc. `ot rir CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM Arm: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (9541484-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: D111-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-02 Sampled: 11/20/14 15:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q Un is Method DF MDL NIL Q£t€ its Analyst 825000 (Sulproks) 0.00251 3E$U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00251 0.00754 11/20/[9 12/01/14 Si. Matovphos(COMM) 0.060060 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82790 1 0.000060 0.00181 11/28/14 12/01/19 SL 0rtoloienthion 0-00233 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00210 0.00689 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 3244-90-4 Aspan 0.00244 JEE,U mg/k1 EPA 3595/8270C 1 0.00299 0.00711 11/28/14 12/01/4 SL 86-50-0 A2lnphos.Memo 0.00350 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 1595/82700 1 0.00350 0.01050 11/28/19 12/01/14 SL 2642-71-9 A2lnpno5,Ethyl 0.00290 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/8270C 1 0.00290 0.00871 11/28/14 12/01/14 5L 786-19-6 CahophenMMan 0.00326 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00326 0.00978 11/20/14 12/01/14 SL 2921-88.2 Chlorpyrifos 0.00143 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545 18270 1 0.00193 0.00430 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 5590-13-0 CMorpynfos Methyl 0.00213 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00213 0.00639 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 56-72-4 Coumaphos 0.00641 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00641 0.01920 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 8065-48-3 Oememn 005 0.00229 1EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/02700 1 0.00224 0.00674 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 333-41-5 0iaunon 0.00144 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00144 0.00453 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 62-73-7 0knlorvas(00vP) 0.00186 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00186 0.0558 11/23/14 12/01/14 IL 141-66-2 01410100105 0.00319 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00319 000856 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 60-51-5 Olmethoate 0.000816 WE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000816 0.00245 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 78-342 Oioxathion 0.00233 WE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00233 0.00700 11/20/14 12/01/14 A 298-04-4 0isulfoton 0.00592 WE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/52700 1 0.00592 0.01780 11/20/14 12/01/14 4 210964-5 EPN 0.00266 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00266 0.00796 11/28/14 12/01/14 a 563-12-2 Ethioc 0.00355 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00355 0.01070 11/28/14 12/01/14 A 1119998-4 Ethopep 0.00213 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00213 0.00638 11/23/19 12/01/14 51 52-05-7 Famphur 0.00255 3EE h mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00255 0.00755 11/13/14 12/01/14 IL 12:14.5 Fenmwnon 0.00150 lee,r. mg/kg EPA 1545/827X I 0.00150 0.00449 11/20/14 12/01/14 SL 115-962 Fensulkroior 0.00059 JEE,L mg/kg EPA 3545 6270C 1 0.00059 0.00177 11/20/14 12/01/19 SL 55-389 Fenihlon 0.00227 IEE,tI mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00227 0.00680 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 944-22-9 Fono181o5 0.03418 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270E 1 0.00118 0.00353 5428/14 12/01/14 SL 2160990-5 Leotoph05 001913 ME,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00413 0.01240 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 121-75-5 Malathion 0110198 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82760 1 0.00198 0.00594 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 1so-s05 Merphoe 0.00758 le,U mg/kg EPA 3545/3270C 1 0.00758 0.0227) 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 7786-347 Mevmohos 0000916 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/3270 1 0.000916 000275 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 6923-22-4 Monammphos 0-000310 ]Ea U mg/kg EPA 1545/8270C 1 0.000318 0.000953 11/26/14 12/01/14 IL 300-76-5 mho 0.900769 .EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000769 0.00231 11/28/14 12/02/14 IL 56-38-2 Parathion-ethyl 000%7 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00967 0.02900 11/10/14 12/01/14 IL 298060 ParatMon-methyl 0.00_09 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/6270C 1 0.00189 0.00567 11/28/19 12/01/14 IL 293-02-2 Phorate 0.00270 JEE,V mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00270 0.00810 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL 13171-21-6 Phos(Alamiom 0000487 JEE,V mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C I 0000487 0.08146 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 79484-1 Ronne! 0.00249 IEE,V mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00249 0.00747 11/28/14 12/01/14 IL EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone:(561)689-6701,fax;(561)689-6702 Page 6 of 14 _—w Palm Beath Eronertal '.' rvanilaboratoneslnc. 11' CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 229 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/9/2019 9:38:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)989-8500 FAX: (959)484-5196 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DU1-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-02 Sampled: 11/20/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Men Received: 11/21/19 16'.00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results QUnits Method DF MOL PDL Date QaSg Analyst 22248-79-9 Almphm(Te12chIorvmphos) 0.00121 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00122 0.00367 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 3689-24-5 Wlfotepp 0.00273 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3546/82700 1 0.00273 0.00819 11/28/14 11/01/14 SL 13071-79-9 Terburas 0.00230 JET U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00230 0.01690 11/28/14 12/01/I4 SL 297-97-2 Thor.arm(Zinoohos) 0.00220 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00220 0.00662 11/28/14 32/01/14 SL 346.4346A Takutlan(Pmfaks) 640E-5 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 9.40E-5 0.00253 1128/14 12/01/14 SL 327980 Tnvhloronate 0.10307 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 _00307 000920 11/28/14 12/01/14 SI %Recovery Q 0/13 Recovery Limits NA Su,rcgate:Nitrobenzene-d5 19 lEE,U ami 47-131 321-668 Sucgate:2-Fluoict,PhenN lEE,U Limit 51-134 NA Swrryate:p-TerphenyI.1 4 1r IEE,U Um:59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results 2 Units Methed DF MDL POL Date Pate Analyst 440-38-2 Arsenk 0.04 mg/kg Cry EPA 60200 1 0.003 0.200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PLS 7439-93-1 Lead 45.5 mg/kg ory EPA 60200 1 0.007 0.200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PL5 Percent Dry Weight Extraction Analysis CASE Parameter Results Q units McShgd QP. MDL EQy Pats PAR Analvst NA eM Solids 100 9'13 CmapMlon 1 1.0 1.0 11/23/14 11/26/14 AT EPA# FL01227 DOM# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33909,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 7 of 14 _e- Palm Beach Environmental j' Latoratones frt. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM ATrN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT it: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAx: (959)489-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP1-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-03 Sampled: 11/20/1400:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis QAIX Parameter Results QUnits Method a Ma POL Date MA Analyst 319-54-6 alpha-BHC oro U 39/kg EPA 3545/BCBIA 003 01 11/25/14 11/26/14 DO 58-89-9 gamma-DK(LMane) 2.04 U Ig/kg EPA 3545/80814 3.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 76-44-8 Heptachlor IIH U i.9/kg EPA 3545/8081A 104 0.1 1125/14 11/26/14 00 3049%2 Alnnn o.03 a hg/kg EPA 3545/80131A O.03 o1 11/26/14 11/16/14 00 319-857 beta-1311C 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 0.05 0.1 11/16/14 11/26/14 DO 319-86-8 delb9nc 9.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 9.04 0.1 11/16/14 11/26/14 DO 1024-52-3 Heptachlor epoxide J.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 0-04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 959-98-8 Endmultan l 9.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 0.03 Ohl 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 5566-34-1 anima-Chlordane 0.r ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 0.W0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DO 5103-21-9 alpl -Chlordane 0.1 ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 0.94 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DO 72-55-9 4,4-DDE 3.2 ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 104 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DO 60.52-I Dieletln 0.1 ug/kg EPA 3545/8001A 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 111/26/14 DD 2-20-8 Endnn 0.01 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8CBIA 0.01 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 33213-65-9 Endosullan II 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8C81A 0.05 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DD 22-54-8 4,4-DDD 0.07 LI ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 0.02 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 50-293 4,4-DDT 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808IA 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DO 1031-07-8 Endosullan sulfate 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 7243.5 Methorychlor 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8081A 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 00 53494-70-5 Encun Ke1 ere 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/0081A 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 oo NA Total Chlordane L2 ug/kg EPA 3545/11081A 01 31 11/16/14 11126/14 DO 8001-352 Torephene C.1 U ug/k9 EPA 3545/0081A 0.1 11 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD °/o Recovery Q %Recovery Limits 2051-29-3 Surrogate'.Decachlofolsohenyl 163% In 41-170 -- 821-09.8 Surrogate:Tetrachloro-m-mene 145% umrt 40-175 EPA#FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 8 of 14 -yr_ Palm Beech Emrimnmertal r j' Lat ratoneslrc. 4 illitV i . CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT St: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUPI-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-03 Sampled: 11/20/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/1416:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q keit/ Method DF MDL E Date DAIS Analyst OolSpp (Sulprofos) 105251 36£.U mg/kg EPA 3545/02701 1 0.00251 0.00754 11/28/14 12/01/14 5L cm/Dugan(OMnn) 0.000602 3EE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270[ 1 0.100602 0.00181 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL Ditllofenthon 100230 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270[ 1 0.00230 0.00689 11/28/14 12/01/14 5L 3240.90-4 Aspon 0.00244 JEE,U mg/kg EPA3545/8270C 1 0.00244 0.00731 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 0650-0 A9npnos,Methyl 0-00350 155,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270[ 1 0.00350 0.01050 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 2642-71-9 Kmpla;EthA 0-00290 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00290 0.00871 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 706-19-6 Callophenothi0n 0-00326 IEE.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00326 0.00978 11/28/14 II/01/14 SL 292128-2 Chlorpyrifos 0.00143 3E5,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270[ 1 0.00143 0.00430 6028/14 12/01/14 SL 5598-I3-0 ChbrlMlfcs Malf 0.00211 IES U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00213 0.00639 11/28114 12/01/14 SL 56-72-4 Coumaphos 0.00641 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00641 0.01920 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 8065-48-3 Demtlon C&5 100530 IEE U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270c 1 0.00530 0.01590 11/28/14 12/01/14 SI 333-41.5 Damon 0.00144 3E5,a mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00144 0.00433 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 62-73-7 DiOlbrvos.D0VPl 0.00186 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000186 0.00558 11/28/14 12/01/14 a 141-66-2 Demrophos 0000319 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270[ 1 0000319 0,00956 11/28/14 12/01/14 St 60-51-5 Dimetoate 0000816 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000016 0.00245 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 78-30.2 Dai3Mon 000233 IEE U mg/kg EPA 3 545 1 8270C 1 000233 0.00700 11/28/14 12/01/I4 SL 298-04-4 Dculloton 000592 .EE U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000592 0.01780 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 210464_5 EPN 0.00266 3EE U mg/kg EPA 3545/92700 1 0.00266 0.00796 11128/14 12/01/14 SL 563-122-2 Ethan 0.00242 ,EE U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00242 0.00725 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 13194-48-4 Ethapmp 0.00213 3EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.81213 0.00638 11/28,14 12/01/14 Si_ 5295-7 Famphur 0.00255 JEE,V mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0:00255 0.0[765 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 122214-5 Fem[rotmn 0.00350 IEE u mg/kg EPA 3545/827CC 1 000150 1.36449 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 115-90-2 Fensullothan 0.00059 14,V mg/kg EPA 3545/827CC 1 0.00059 020177 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 55-38-9 Fenian 0.00227 1E5,V mg/kg EPA 3545/027[c 1 0.00227 0.00680 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 944-22.9 Fomphos 0.00118 36E,0 mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00118 0.00353 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 2160990-5 Leptophos 0.00413 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00413 001240 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 121-75-5 Malathan 0.00198 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00198 000594 11/28114 12/01/14 SL 150-50-5 Memhos 000758 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000758 002270 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 7786-34-7 Mevinphos 000916 JEE,U mg/k0 EPA 3545/8270C 1 0000916 0.00275 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 6927-22-4 Mdgcmmphos 0.000318 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000310 0.000953 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 300-76- Naled 0000769 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000769 0.00231 11128/14 12/01/14 5L 56302 Parathion-ethyl 0-00967 IEE,a mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000967 0.02900 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 298-00-0 Parathion-methyl 4.00189 35E,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00189 0.00567 11/28/14 12/01/14 A 298-02-2 Phorate 0.00270 WE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/32700 1 0.WDO 0.WBIO 11/28/14 12/2/01/14 Si. 13171-21-6 Phosphamidon 0.000487 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.000487 0.00146 11/26/14 12/01/14 sm 299.84-3 Ronnel 0.00249 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00249 0.00747 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL EPA#FLO1227 D0H# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Pages of 14 et Palm Beod.Erwimmiertal }' Labora4ones Ire. `Al‘tfile 'It�I CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)484-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: 0UP1-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-03 Sampled: 11/20/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Men Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CAS Parameter Results Qyojit Method DF MDL POI Date Mg Analyst 22248-79-9 501oonm(Tebamlorvmgpv 0.00122 JEE u mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00122 0.00367 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 3689.21-5 Sullo@pp 0.00273 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00273 0.00819 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 13071-79-9 Terburos 0.00230 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00230 0.00690 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 297-97-2 Tnionaaln(Zmop r 05) 0.00220 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00220 0.00662 11/28/14 12101/14 SL 34643-46-4 Tokurh!on(Protnmlm) 8.40E-5 BE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/52700 1 8.40E-5 0.000253 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 327-98.0 Tncdloronate 0.00307 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00307 0.00920 11/28/14 12/0414 SL Wo Recovery Q %Recovery Limits Surrogate.Nitrobenzene-d5 6,6 JEE,u mn 42421 321-60-8 Surrogate 2-F1uorobiphenyl % JEE,U unlit 51-134 NA Surrogate p-Terphenyld14 % JEE,U iniU 59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results 4 IAZoA2 Method DF MDL POI Date Date Analyst 1440-38-2 Arsenic 9.13 mg/kg Ery EPA 5020B 1 0.303 0.200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PLS 7439-92-1 Lead 311 E mg/kg dry EPA 60205 I 0.307 0.200 12/02/14 12/03/14 PLS Percent Dry Weight Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results Q Unica Method DE MDL EQL pate RAE ADalytt NA %Solids 100 % Cakulalso 1 L0 10 0723/14 1166/14 AT EPA#FL01227 DOM#E86957 SFWMD#98191 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 10 of 14 - -_-et_ Palm Beeth Emimemerlal y LabOratores Ire. z ` , CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOO#; 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2014 9:38:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvi PROJECT it: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)489-8500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Communit} Description: DUP2-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-09 Sampled: 11/20/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8081A Extraction Analysis CABS Parameter Re1ILBs QUnit Method QE MDL POL Date QateAnthnt 319-846 alpna8H0 0.03 U u/kg EPA 3545/8001A I 003 0.1 11/26/14 15/26/14 DD 58-39-9 gamma-BHC(bndane) 004 U ug/kg EPA 3545/830IA I 004 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.34 U ug/kg EPA 3 5545/8001A I 004 0.1 1126/14 11/26/14 DC 309-00-2 Aldrin 003 U ug/kg EPA 3545/8001A 1 0.03 0.1 1126/14 11/26/14 DO 313357 beta-SHE 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 35451 8001A 1 0.05 0.1 1::26/14 11/26/14 DO 31336-3 deIWSHE 0.01 U ug/kg EPA 35451 8081A 1 0.04 0.1 1l/26/14 11/26/14 DD 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.04 U Jlkg EPA 354513381# 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 1126/14 DO 959-98-8 EndosWhn l 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80314 1 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 5566-34-7 gamma-Chlordane 0.9 ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 004 0.1 11/26/14 11/26114 DO 5103-71-9 alpha-dlordane 0.3 ug/kg EPA 1545/8381A 1 004 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 72-55-9 4,400E l.6 I19/kg EPA 3545/50814 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 6C57-1 Dieldrin 0.04 U 09/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.04 Ol 11126/14 11/26/14 DD 72-20.8 Endre 0.01 U ug/kg EPA 3545/303/4 1 0.01 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 3321365-9 Eldosulran II 0.05 U ug/kg EPA 3545/50814 1 0.05 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 72-51-3 4A-DOD 0.07 U ug/kg EPA 3545/808:4 1 0.07 0.1 1426/14 11/26/14 DO 50-29-3 4,1-DOT 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/00814 1 0.03 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/5081A 1 304 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DO 1031-0754 Endosulfan sulfate 0.04 U ug/kg EPA 3545/0081A 1 0.04 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 00 72-43-5 Metho,ycMn 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/00014 1 01 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 OD 94-705 Endrin Ketone 0.03 U ug/kg EPA 3545/008154 1 003 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 J9 NATotal Chlordane 0.6 ug/kg EPA 3545/50814 I 0.1 0.1 1126/14 11/26/14 CD 8C01-35-2 Towptene 0.1 U ug/kg EPA 3545/80814 1 0.1 0.1 11/26/14 11/26/14 DD 0/a Recovery Q 0/o Recovery Limits 24.3 surrogate.Decacmeroorpnen l 127% um t 41-173 872-048 Surrogate:Tet2d110ra-m- Ieue III% Limit 40-175 EPA# FLD1227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC #VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 11 of 14 Palm Beach Eriironmertal }' Late-atones Inc. ,t � a;ie -tet 1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sciences LOO 4: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COCA: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/4/2019 9:38:04AM A1TM: Maria Paituvi PROJECT if: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (954)489-0500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP2-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-09 Sampled: 11/20/1400.00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis O8S1 Parameter Results Q Units Method QE MDL P01 pale gale Analyst soisty, (Sul proros) 0.00251 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00251 0.00754 1120/14 12/01/14 SL Catwphos(CWnn) 0060602 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000602 0.00181 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL o¢nlorenmlon 0.00230 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00230 0.00689 11/28/14 12/01/14 St 3244-90-4 Aspon 0.00244 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00244 0.00731 11/28/19 12/01/19 SL 86-50-0 Azlrpnos,Methyl 0.00350 IEE,U nig/kg EPA 3545 113270C 1 0.00350 0.01050 11/28/14 12/C1/19 SL 2642-2 12 9 Azmpnas,Ethyl 0.00290E,U mg/kg EPA 3545/827C 1 0.00290 0.00871 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 786-19-6 Carbopnenclhion 00036 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270C 1 0.00326 0.00978 11/28/14 12/01(14 SL 292198-2 Cllorpynfos 0.00143 TEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00143 0.00130 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 5598-13-0 OilarpyMgs methyl 0.00213 )EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/13270C 1 0.0021] 0.00639 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 56-721 Coumaphos 0.00641 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00641 0.01920 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 8065-48-3 0aneton 02.S 0.00530 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0,0090 0.01530 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 333-41-5 Diazinon 0.00144 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0.00144 0.00433 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 62-73-7 01[Mprvaz(DOW) 0,00186 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000186 0-00550 11/28/14 12/01/14 5L 141-66-2 Dicrotophos 0.000319 186.U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000319 0100956 11/28/14 12/01/14 St 0051-S Dimethoate 0.000816 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.100816 10.00 11/18/14 12/01/14 St 78-30.2 Owwlhion 0.00233 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00233 0.00700 11/28/14 12/01/19 St 298-04-4 Orsulbton 0.00592 JEE U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00592 0.01700 1:/28/14 12/01/19 51. 2104#S EPN 0.00266 TEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00256 0.00796 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 563-12-2 anion 0.00292 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00242 0.00725 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 1319348-4 Ethoprop 0.00213 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00213 0.00638 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 52-85-7 Famphur 0.00255 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270[ 1 0.00255 0.00765 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 12214-5 Rmtmtim 0.00150 ]EE,0 mg/kg EPA3545/8270C 1 0.00150 0.00449 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 115-90-1 Fe0501100909 0.00059 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3595/8270C 1 0.00059 0.00177 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 55-38-9 Fentlon 0.00227 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00227 0.00680 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 944-22-9 F000phos 0.03110 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00118 0.00353 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 21509905 Lemophos 0.00413 35E,U mg/kg EPA 1545/8270C 1 0.00413 0.01240 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 121-785 Malathion 0.00198 ]E-,U mg/kg SPA 3545/82700 1 ...01198 0.00594 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL ISOSO-s Merynos 0.00758 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/0270C 1 .00758 0.92270 11/28114 12/01/14 SL 7786.342 Mev'nphos 0.000916 IEE U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.0,30916 0.00275 11/28/14 12/01(14 SI 6923-22-4 Monocrotoptes 0900318 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.000318 0.000953 11/18/14 12/01/14 SL 300-76-5 Naled 0.000769 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0000769 0.00231 11/28/14 12/01/19 SL 56-38-2 Parathion-ethyl 0.00967 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00967 0.02900 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 298-00-0 Parathion-methyl 0.00189 JEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 000189 0.00567 11/28/14 12/01/19 SL 29802-2 Phorate 0.00270 lEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00270 0.00810 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 13171-21-6 Phosoham don 0.000987 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82706 1 0000407 040146 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 299-84-3 Porn& 0.00249 ]EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/827CC 1 0.00249 0:00747 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMD#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone:(561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 12 of 14 - Palm Si ErMmynertal y Lahttalorles Inc. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS E Sdences LOG#: 0013068 224 SE 9th Street COC#: 21623 Ft Lauderdale,FL 33316 REPORTED: 12/9/2019 9138:04AM ATTN: Maria Paituvl PROJECT#: 7-0002-023 PHONE: (959)4848500 FAX: (954)484-5146 PROJECT: Parking Lot and 21st Street Community Description: DUP2-11202014 Lab ID: 0013068-04 Sampled: 11/20/14 00:00 Matrix: Soil Sampled By: Trent Van Allen Received: 11/21/14 16:00 EPA Method 8141 List in Soil Extraction Analysis CASA Parameter Results 2Dni�t Method 2E MDL POL Date Date AMOS 22248-79-9 Stiroph05.(Tetrachlorvinphiosl 0.00120 E8,U mg/kg EPA)545/err 1 C.00121 0.00367 :1128/14 12101/14 SL 3689-24-5 Sulrolepp 0.00273 :88,U mg/kg EPA 3545/5270C 1 0.00273 0.0[819 11128/14 12/01/14 SL 13071-79-9 TerOume 0.00130 :EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 0.00230 0.00390 I1128/14 :2/01/14 SL 297-97-2 Tmonann 2lnophosl 0.00120 IEE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 000220 0.0.0661 11/28/14 12/01/14 SL 34643-46-4 Tokuthnn(PrcTJObs) 8.40E-5 .EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/8270C 1 9.40E-5 0.000253 11/18/14 12/01/14 SL 327-98.0 inePloronate 0.00300 .EE,U mg/kg EPA 3545/82700 1 0-00300 0.00020 11/18/14 12/01/14 51 oh Recovery Q 0/p Recovery Limits NA Surrogate:NttromnzenaGs ^k IEEu Lmf4hOl 321-60-S Surrogate:2-FluomdoheMl % JEE,U Arm:51-134 NA Surrogate:pArerphenyi-A 14 % lEE,U Amt:59-135 Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods Extraction Analysis CAS# Parameter Results 2 US Method DF MDL Pot Date fit Analyst 7440-313-2 Arsenic 107- mg/kg dry EPA 60208 1 0.003 0200 12/02114 12/03/14 PLS 7439-92-1 Lead 42,2 mg/kg dry EPA 60205 1 0.007 0200 12/02/14 11/03/14 PLS Percent Dry Weight Extraction Analysis CA5# Parameter Results Q Units Method 2E MQL 221 Data Pate Analyst NA W.Solids 100 % Calculation 1 1.0 1.2 11m114 11/26/14 AT EPA# FL01227 DOH#E86957 SFWMDtt 48191 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, Suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409, phone: (561)689-6701, fax: (561)689-6702 Page 13 of 14 Palm Beak Erwimrmmrial y Laboratoneslnt. `.4t(-11111111114: Notes and Definitions Ana vte included in the analysis,but not detected IEE Analysis performed by Chide Environmental Carta ES5O% The concentraton indicated For this a nalyte i+ esti mated value above the calibration range of the l nso nenL.This value considered an eminate CLP a EPA# FL01227 DOH# E86957 SFWMO#48141 PBC#VC0000018083 1550 Latham Road, suite 2,West Palm Beach, FL 33409,phone: (561)689-6701,fax: (561)689-6702 Page 14 of t4 I ng if. -Ar Palm Beach Environmental Laboratories, Inc. NQuote IA CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FDEP: c...pnr Naini, - LAB ANALYSIS,, Mau Codes PH ..a City> Sime'.' ]p' ,uID mi.. �� a.w .wwn. , .a..,..0 o.: m. • • w AnnPNma#:,. 4l es vam u�n MY oW =cal . Fay.... ..1 C • .w..vw. n m.esc Rum+ •y Pans Cada Mune EASFY G1 A.Norte EHCL aOer simperSummate/Name i 1,/ .. . . g b.NNU. Y Mu'W N Sample label rasa ee a m,„, �� q `{ CICSoa ¢H.26203 (Chem a)) D"ti e $t o N:J H Ila 2 v 1v ,/ / 5 _6 7 _8 _9 0 r sense ` MI n QA/QC Reptm Level COC OK 'Initials Y/N Hour Cede Eke None 1 2 1_Otter )• N Item RelinouisMV b., Afhhahun M¢ ¶me RecchN By ( Affiliation Date ilmt lab Cat Only i1, 1 }, w No .. amnevem nw c1550 Latham Road,Su2•West Palm Bendy 31409•Tel (5606149-6701•Fax 061)6896702 h ile Page of -4, coos 21619 Log#: —firc Palm Beach Environmental Po a: Laboratories, Inc. Quote#: 6 1'b w CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FDEP: Company Nie: LAB ANALYSIS Matin Codes Address _ PB w "..wwu. 'a. Pols PPM ,am Lia Ml rnirwm CitF Srvz. lip cnry ue amyl..am xm W %mw LwayAllo'.. FlioncX:. xn xmmaym Nm a man FUY: an rn...x... n Fleieu e1 Peas Cedes Nmrcen`,iY' Mone B NCI. osumger .anr. weave/Naw' .. l4` d, 3.11103 F.IMIN Sample Label tenaam $ - C.10504 0..No2S2oi (01011ID) yamDn^ 0 4 D.NOH I.Ice _I a ✓ / / _2 ✓ l 3 — _ / i _5 _6 7 S 9 0 r s.%Nu. -QAHICRpat Level COC OR Initials arv.aa PI m YIN _ Hoy Dam Due. Noce I 2 1 00r Y N Item Relinquished by Mbhatien Dale limeReceived N By Hhetion P@ Time Labl:f'e Only . .. i Ia GeMann.Parr ammo.ar we M.m mom, 1550 Latham Road,Suite 2•West Palm Reach.FL 33109•Tel061)689 6401•Fax (561)689-6702Page of Coos 21623 e-Hardcopy 2.0 Automated Report Southeast ACCUTESrn LADORATO RIE$ `i 7xa` 02/02115 Technical Report for E Sciences, Inc Parking Lot& Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL I 7-0002-025 Accutest Job Number: FA21662 Sampling Date: 01/24/15 F Report to: E Sciences, Inc 224 SE 9th St Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 mpaituvi@esciencesinc.cora ATTN: Maria Paituvi Total number of pages in report: 51 Test results contained within this data package meet the requirements Norm Farmer onlre National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Technical Director and or state specific certification programs as applicable ClientService contact: Andrea Colby 407-425-6700 Certifications'. PL([835101, LA(03051),KS(F-10327), IA(366), II.(2110163). NC (573). NJ(F1 002), SC(96035001) Don FLAP(LA-rt 422291,CA(2937),TX(T04704404). PA(68-035731, VA(460177, AK,AR,GA.KY, MA, Mk,OK, U I',WA This report shall not be reproduced,except In its entirety,without the written approval of Accutest Imboratories. Test results relate only to samples analyzed Soudeaa• 4405 Vineland Road• Suite C-15. Orlando, IT 32R 11 • tel_407-425-6700• fx': 4074225-0707• blip www.accutestmm 1 of 51 Accutest Laboratories is the sole authority for authorizing edits or modifications to this •ACCLJTEST. document Unauthorized modification of this report is strictly prohibited. FA21662 Sections: Table of Contents IN Section 1: Sample Summary 3 Section 2: Summary of Hits 4II Section 3: Sample Results 5 3.1: FA21662-1: MW1-01242015 6 3.2: FA21662-2: MW2-01242015 9 CI 3.3: FA21662-3: MW3-01242015 12 3.4: FA21662-3F: MW3-01242015 15 3.5: FA21662-4: MW4-01242015 16 Section 4: Misc. Forms 19 4.1: Chain of Custody 20 Section 5: GC Semi-volatiles - QC Data Summaries 25111 5.1: Method Blank Summary 26 5.2: Blank Spike Summary 27 5.3: Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary 29 Section 6: A letals Analcsis- QC Data Summaries 30 6.1: Prep QC MP28493: Hg 31 6.2: Prep QC MP28495: Sb,As,Be,Cd,Cr,Cu,Pb,Ni,Se,Ag,T1,Zn 36 6.3: Prep QC MP28507: As 42 Section 7: General Chemistry - QC Data Summaries 48 7.1: Method Blank and Spike Results Summary 49 7.2: Matrix Spike Results Summary 50 7.3: Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Summary 51 NM 2 of 51 II ACCUTEST. FA21662 Accu[est Laboratories Sample Summary E Sciences, Inc Job No: FA21662 Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Project No: 7-0002-025 Sample Collected Matrix Client Number Date lime By Received Code Type Sample ID FA21662-1 01/24/15 10:00 TV 01/26/15 AQ Ground Water MWI-01242015 FA21662-2 01/24/15 10:35 TV 01/26/15 AQ Ground Water MW2-01242015 FA21662-3 01/24/15 11:10 TV 01/26/15 AQ Ground Water MW3-01242015 FA21662-3F 01/24/15 11:10 TV 01/26/.15 AQ Groundwater Filtered MW3-01242015 FA21662-4 01/24/15 11:45 TV 01/26/15 AQ Ground Water MW4-01242015 MO 3 of 51 •ACCUTESt FA21662 Summary of Hits Page 1 of 1 is Job Number: FA21662 Account: E Sciences, Inc Project: Parking Lot&Community Center: 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FI. Collected: 01/24/15 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Result/ Analyte Qual POI. MDL Units Method FA21662-1 MWI-01242015 Chromium 1.51 10 1.0 ug/1 SW846 6010C Zinc 8.1I 20 4.4 ug/I SW8466010C Nitrogen, Ammonia 1.6 0.10 0.030 mg/I EPA 350.1 FA21662-2 MW2-01242015 Antimony 1.1 I 6.0 1.0 ug/I SW846 6010C Chromium 1.41 10 1.0 ug/I SW846 6010C Zinc 6.41 20 4.4 ugh SW846 6010C Nitrogen, Ammonia 1.4 0.10 0.030 mg/I EPA 350.1 FA21662-3 31W3-01242015 Antimony 2.2I 6.0 1.0 ugh SW846 6010C Arsenic 21.3 10 1.3 ugh SW8466010C Silver 0.80I 10 0.70 ugh SW84660IOC Zinc 5.9I 20 4.4 ug/I SW846 6010C Nitrogen, Ammonia 1.0 0.10 0.030 mg/I EPA 350.1 FA21662-3F MW3-01242015 No hits reported in this sample. FA21662-4 MW4-01242015 Antimony 1.5 1 6.0 1.0 ug/I SW846 6010C Arsenic 4.1I 10 1.3 ug/I SW846 6010C Chromium 1.8I 10 1.0 ug/I SW846 6010C Nickel 1.6I 40 0.40 ug/I SW846 6010C Nitrogen, Ammonia 0.22 0.10 0.030 mg/I EPA 350.1 so 4 of 51 IN ACCUTE8T. FA21662 "-'-'.°-'.- Section 3 Southeast IYBORATORIES ' 14 Sample Results Report of Analysis ME 5 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FR21062 Accutest Laboratories so Report of Analysis Page 1 of I Client Sample ID: MW1-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-I Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Method: SW846 8081B SW846 3510C Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot & Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch Run#1 TT370659.D 1 01/29'15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 GTT1590 Run#2 Initial Volume Final Volume Run #1 250 ml 5.0 ml Run #2 Pesticide PPL List CAS No. Compound Result PQL MDL Units Q 309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0064 U 0.040 0.0064 ug/ 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 0.0040 U R040 0.0040 ug/ 319-85-7 beta-BHC 0.011 U 0.040 0.011 ug/ 319-86-8 delta-BHC 0.0079 U 0.040 0.0079 ug( 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 0.0042 U 0.040 0.0042 ug/ 12789-03-6 Chlordane 0.17 U 0.40 0.17 ug/ 60-57-I Dieldrin 0.0067 U 0.040 0.0067 ug/ 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 0.010 U 0.080 0.010 ug/ 72-55-9 4,4'-DDE 0.015 U 0.080 0.015 ug/ 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT 0.010 U 0.080 0.010 ug/ 72-20-8 Endrin 0.0070 U 0.080 0.0070 ug/ 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 0.0066 U 0.080 0.0066 ug/ 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.0065 U 0.080 0.0065 ug/ 959-98-8 Endosulfan-I 0.0066 U 0.040 0.0066 ug/ 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-II 0.0080 U 0.040 0.0080 ug/ 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.0062 U 0.040 0.0062 ug/ 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.0072 U 0.040 0.0072 ug/ 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.010 U 0.080 0.010 ug/ 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1.2 U 2.0 1.2 ug/ CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Run# I Run#2 Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 87% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 76% 27-127% U= Not detected MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Result> = MDL but< PQL J= Estimated value PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit V= Indicates analyte found in associated method blank L - Indicates value exceeds calibration range N= Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound 1.11 6 of 51 ACCUTEST. PA21662 ......•••••• Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of I Client Sample ID: MW 1-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-1 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Total Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Antimony 1.0 U 6.0 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Arsenic 1.3 U 10 1.3 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 I M SW8466010C2 SW8463010A4 Beryllium 0.20 U 4.0 0.20 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 I SW8466010C2 SW8463010A4 Cadmium 0.20 U 5.0 0.20 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846 6010C 2 SW8463010A4 Chromium 1.5 I 10 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW84630111A4 Copper 1.0 U 25 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 I.M SW846 6010C 2 SW8463010A4 Lead 1.1 U 5.0 LI ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Mercury 0.030 U 0.50 0.030 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 IL SW846 7470A SW8467470A3 Nickel 0.40 U 40 0.40 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846 6010C 2 SW8463010A4 Selenium 2.9 U 10 2.9 ug/ 01/27/15 01,127/15 LM SW8466010C2 SW8463010A4 Silver 0.70 U 10 0.70 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 5W8463010A4 Thallium 1.4 U 10 1.4 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846 6010C 2 SW/463010A4 Zinc 8.1 1 20 4.4 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW84660I0C 2 SW8463010A4 (I) Instrument QC Batch: MAI2180 (2) Instrument QC Batch: MA12182 (3)Prep QC Batch: MP28493 (4)Prep QC Batch: MP28495 PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< PQL MN 7 of 51 IN ACCUTEST. FA21 662 Accutest Laboratories so Report of Analysis Page 1 of 1 Client Sample ID: MWI-01242015el Lab Sample ID: FA21662-1 Date Sampled: 01;14/15 Matrix: AQ- Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n'a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center: 1700 Convention Center Dr. Miami Bch. FL General Chemistry Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Analyzed By Method Nitrogen, Ammonia 1.6 0.10 0.030 mg/I I 01'28:15 11:21 DM EPA 350.1 Nitrogen, Nitrate 6 2.5 U 5.0 2.5 mg/I 50 0126.1509.511A EPA 300:SWP469056A Nitrogen, Nitrite a 2.5 U 5.0 2.5 mg/I 50 0126:1509.511A EPA 300,SW8469056A (a)Dilution required due to matrix interference. PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I— Indicates a result = MDL but < PQL In 8 of 51 a ACCU1-ESi: FAI1661 .......e.... Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of 1 Client Sample ID: MW2-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-2 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Method: SW8468081B SW8463510C Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch Run X1 TT370660.D I 01/29/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 Gil1590 Run 02 Initial Volume Final Volume Run 01 260 ml 5.0 ml Run 02 Pesticide PPL List CAS No. Compound Result PQL MDL Units Q 309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0062 U 0038 0.0062 ug/ 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 0.0038 U 0038 0.0038 ug/ 319-85-7 beta-BHC 0.010 U 0.038 0.010 ug/ 319-86-8 delta-BHC 0.0076 U 0.038 0.0076 ug/ 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 0.0040 U 0.038 0.0040 ug/ 12789-03-6 Chlordane 0.16 U 0.38 0.16 ug/ 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.0064 U 0.038 0.0064 ug/ 72-54-8 4.4'-DDD 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 72-55-9 4.4'-DDE 0.014 U 0.077 0.014 ug/ 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 72-20-8 Endrin 0.0067 U 0.077 0.0067 ug/ 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 0.0064 U 0.077 0.0064 ug/ 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.0063 U 0.077 0.0063 g/ 959-98-8 Endosulfan-I 0.0063 U 0.038 0.0063 ug/ 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-11 0.0077 U 0.038 0.0077 ug/ 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.0060 U 0.038 0.0060 ug/ 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.0069 U 0.038 0.0069 ug/ 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1.1 U 1.9 1.1 ug/ CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Rung I Rung 2 Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 86% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 78% 27-127% U= Not detected MDL= Method Detection Limit I- Result> = MDL but< PQL J= Estimated value PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit V= Indicates analyte found in associated method blank L= Indicates value exceeds calibration range N -- Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound Ma 9 of 51 FA2l662 .Acemest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of I N Client Sample ID: MW2-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-2 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ- Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Total Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Antimony 1.1 I 6.0 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 IV SW846 6010C 2 SW8463010A4 Arsenic 1.3 U 10 1.3 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 Lbt SW846 6010C 2 S33846 3010 A 4 Beryllium 0.20 U 4.0 0.20 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW84660111C 2 S13'846301044 Cadmium 0.20 U 5.0 0.20 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM S3138466010C2 SW8463010A4 Chromium 1.4 I 10 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Copper 1.0 U 25 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 I NI SW846 wmC 2 SW8403010A4 Lead 1.1 U 5.0 I. ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846 6010C 2 SW8463010A4 Mercury 0.030 U 0.50 0.030 ug/ 01/27/15 01127/15 11. SW8467470AI SW8467470A3 Nickel 0.40 U 40 0.40 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 mut SWS46w10c 2 SW8463010A4 Selenium 2.9 U 10 2.9 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Silver 0.70 U 10 0.70 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW846 6010C 2 SW 846 3010A 4 Thallium 1.4 U 10 1.4 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW8466010c 2 SW8463010A4 Zinc 6.4 I 20 4.4 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 221 5W8466010C 2 5W8463010334 (I) Instrument QC Batch: MA12180 (2)Instrument QC Batch: MAI2182 (3)Prep QC Batch: MP28493 (4)Prep QC Batch: MP28495 PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< PQL ME 10 of 51 I.ACCUTEST. FA21652 Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of I N Client Sample ID: MW2-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-2 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL General Chemistry Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Analyzed By Method Nitrogen, Ammonia 1.4 0.10 0.030 mg/I 1 0128,151122 DM EPA 350.1 Nitrogen, Nitrate a 5.0 U 10 5.0 mg/I 100 0146:1510:08JA EPA 300;5W8469056A Nitrogen, Nitrite a 5.0 U 10 5.0 mg/I 100 0126:610.08 JA I'PA 300,SW8469056A (a)Dilution required due to matrix interference. PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDI.= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< POI. Ma 11 of 51 a ACCLJTES t FA21662 ""'..".'" Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of I Client Sample ID: MW3-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-3 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/U Method: SW8468081B SW8463510C Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot& Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch Run 41 TT370636.D 1 01128/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 GfT1589 Run #2 Initial Volume Final Volume Run 41 260m1 5.0 ml Run 02 Pesticide PPL List CAS No. Compound Result PQL MDL Units Q 309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0062 U 0.038 00062 ug/ 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 0.0038 U 0.038 0.0038 ug/ 319-85-7 beta-B[IC 0.010 U 0.033 0.010 ug/ 319-86-8 delta-BHC 0.0076 U 0.038 0.0076 ug/ 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 0.0040 U 0.038 0.0040 ug/ 12789-03-6 Chlordane 0.16 U 0.38 0.16 ug/ 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.0064 U 0.038 0.0064 ug/ 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 72-55-9 4,4'-DDE 0.014 U 0.077 0.014 ug! 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 72-20-8 Endrin 0.0067 U 0.077 0.0067 ug/ 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 0.0064 U 0.077 0.0064 ug/ 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.0063 U 0.077 0.0063 ug/ 959-98-8 Endosulfan-I 0.0063 U 0.038 0.0063 ug/ 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-I1 0.0077 U 0.038 0.0077 ug/ 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.0060 U 0.038 0.0060 ug' 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.0069 U 0.038 0.0069 ug/ 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1.1 U 1.9 1.1 ug/ CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Run# I Run#2 Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 102% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 85% 27-12760 U= Not detected MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Result> = MDL but< PQL J= Estimated value PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit V= Indicates analyte found in associated method blank L= Indicates value exceeds calibration range N= Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound ma 12 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FRY16fi3 " ' Accutcst Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of I w Client Sample ID: MW3-01242015el Lab Sample ID: FA21662-3 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center: 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Total Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Antimony 2.2 I 6.0 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LN 50.8466010 2 SW846 3010A4 Arsenic 21.3 10 1.3 ugt 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI S48466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Beryllium 0.20 U 4.0 0.20 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 u1 SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Cadmium 0.20 U 5.0 0.20 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 IN SW8466010C 2 SW546301CA4 Chromium 1.0 U 10 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 1.41 SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Copper 1.0 U 25 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 12N4 Sv48466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Lead 1.1 U 5.0 1.1 ug' 01.27/15 01/27/15 LM SW88466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Mercury 0.030 U 0.50 0.030 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 1L SW8467470AI SW84674702\3 Nickel 0.40 U 40 0.40 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Selenium 2.9 U 10 2.9 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW8466010C22 SW8463010A4 Silver 0.80 I 10 0.70 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LAI SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Thallium 1.4 U 10 1.4 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 1N S331846 6010C 2 SW8463010A4 Zinc 5.9 I 20 4.4 ug! 01.27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW 846 3010A 4 (I)Instrument QC Batch: MA!2180 (2)Instrument QC Batch: MAI2182 (3)Prep QC Batch: MP28493 (4)Prep QC Batch: MP28495 PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U- Indicates a result< MDL MDL = Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< PQL MI 13 of 51 •ACCIJTEST. FA21660 "^---'"'•• Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of I w Client Sample ID: MW3-0124201CI Lab Sample ID: FA21662-3 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: Na Project: Parking Lot &Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL General Chemistry Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Analyzed By Method Nitrogen, Ammonia 1.0 0.10 0.030 mg/I 1 O1.2a/1511:23 Obi GPA 150.E Nitrogen, Nitrate' 10 U 20 10 mg/I 200 OF26,1510:251A EPA 300.SW846 9055A Nitrogen, Nitrite a 10 U 20 10 mg/I 200 0111_01151025 JA EPA 300.S 8462056 (a)Dilution required due to matrix interference. PQL— Practical Quantitation Limit LI= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< PQI. MM 14 of 51 •*ccumeST. FA21662 Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of I a Client Sample ID: MW3-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-3F Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ-Groundwater Filtered Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot& Community Center: 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Dissolved Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Arsenic 1.3 U 10 1.3 ug/1 I 01/30/15 01/30/15 LM SW84660 IOC SW8463010A2 (I) Instrument QC Batch: MA12191 (2)Prep QC Batch: MP28507 PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDI. MDL= Method Detection Limit I— Indicates a result> = MDL but < PQL Ina 15 of 51 •ACCL ITEST. FA 21662 Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of 1 N 'Client Sample ID: MW4-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-4 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ- Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Method: SW846 S081B SW846 3510C Percent Solids: n,/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch Run el TT370637.D 1 01/28/15 EM 01/37/15 OP54722 GTTI 589 Run#2 Initial Volume Final Volume Run#1 260 ml 5.0 ml Run #2 Pesticide PPL List CAS No. Compound Result PQL MDL Units Q 309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0062 U 0.038 0.0062 ug/ 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 0.0038 U 0.038 0.0038 ug/ 319-85-7 beta-BHC 0.010 U 0.038 0.010 ug/ 319-86-8 della-BHC 0.0076 U 0.038 0.0076 ug/ 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 0.0040 U 0.038 0.0040 ug/ 12789-03-6 Chlordane 0.16 U 0.38 0.16 ug' 60-57-I Dieldrin 0.0064 U 0.038 0.0064 ug/ 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 0-0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 72-55-9 4,4'-DDE 0.014 U 0.077 0.014 ug/ 50-29-3 4.4'-DDT 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 72-20-8 Endrin 0.0067 U 0.077 0.0067 ug- 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 0.0064 U 0.077 0.0064 ug/ 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.0063 U 0.077 0.0063 ug/ 959-98-8 Endosulfan-I 0.0063 U 0.038 0.0063 ugi 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-II 0.0077 U 0.038 0.0077 ug/ 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.0060 U 0.038 0.0060 ug/ 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 0.0069 U 0.038 0.0069 ug! 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.0096 U 0.077 0.0096 ug/ 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1.1 U 1.9 1.1 ug! CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Run# 1 Runt,2 Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 109% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 94% 27-127% U= Not detected MDL= Method Detection Limit I- Result> = MDL but< PQL J= Estimated value PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit V= Indicates analyte found in associated method blank L= Indicates value exceeds calibration range N= Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound 16 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA21662 Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of 1 in Client Sample ID: MW4-01242015 Lab Sample ID: FA21662-4 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 CI Matrix: AQ- Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Total Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDI. Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Antimony 1.51 6.0 1.0 ug/ 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846(010C 2 SW84630IOA4 Arsenic 4.1 I 10 1.3 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Beryllium 0.20 U 4.0 0.20 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846601oC 2 SW8463010.A4 Cadmium 0.20 U 5.0 0.20 ugh! 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Chromium 1.81 10 1.0 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846 6010C 2 SW11463010A4 Copper 1.0 U 25 1.0 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW846 6010C 2 SW846301014 Lead 1.1 U 5.0 1.1 ugh! 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Mercury 0.030 U 0.50 0.030 ugh! 01/27/15 01/27/15 1L SW8467470A1 SW846740A3 Nickel 1.61 40 0.40 ug/l 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW84660106 2 SW8463010A4 Selenium 2.9 U 10 2.9 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW84660IOC 2 SW846301014 Silver 0.70 U 10 0.70 ugh 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8403010A4 Thallium 1.4 U 10 1.4 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM SW8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 Zinc 4.4 U 20 4.4 ug/I 01/27/15 01/27/15 LM 5W8466010C 2 SW8463010A4 (I) Instrument QC Batch: MA12180 (2) Instrument QC Batch: MA12182 (3) Prep QC Batch: MP28493 (4) Prep QC Batch: MP28495 PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I - Indicates a result> — MDL but < PQL in 17 of 51 aACCLJTEST. FA2l662 '..".''a.'.. Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page 1 of in Client Sample ID: MW4-01242015el Lab Sample ID: FA21662-4 Date Sampled: 01/24/15 Matrix: AQ -Ground Water Date Received: 01/26/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL General Chemistry Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Analyzed By Method Nitrogen, Ammonia 0.22 0.10 0.030 mg/I 1 01:28'13 11:24 MI EPA 350.1 Nitrogen, Nitrate a 2.5 U 5.0 2.5 mg/I 50 01'26:151042 IA EPA JW SW846 9056A Nitrogen, Nitrite a 2.5 U 5.0 2.5 mg/I 50 01'26'IS 10:42 JA EPA JW,SW846 9050A (a)Dilution required due to matrix interference. PQL— Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> — MDL but< PQL MI 18 of 51 •Accu-reST. FA21662 ""'.."n'" Section 4 Southeast • ACCUTEST ° ; LABORATORIES #"";±�� ( O Misc. Forms Custody Documents and Other Forms Includes the Following where applicable: • Chain of Custody IM 19 of 51 ACCDTEST. FA21662 Accutest Laboratories Southeast 1111Chain of Custody 2-1126 ■ACCUTESTe 44-ITh Vineland Road,seteC-l1 0610;60N 12611 AGE OF LA eR Aeoxrea 164.407-424690 • FAX.407-425-0707 Acetest Quote SKIFF# ww corn PC ..:...2,2.4 SE. u(w,.u^n .�rgapufive -:... COMP Y of .JLJGNCfS ! vt. F•t}fl{yYRJ I: Iq eM 11"4rAefn (OM rV PMMa iE-C4 314 e 0.i �o<,vvns ti v(Fia+k 000 t .1 Y 15 "'PP se�u5RT E/LcA^tiva F.. cn3337h Iv1tp.Ma RL cut. s 1. an.�vv 'IAA PT1nJ: rAVMMhuun OF SU EM JS'NL °i e1- Mvlq..oz 11. SP `Oer4gny-vft4-85:v wm E..EQ"v 4 0 .�, 7-1 `3 ��..' 51 to ..,. .,, ml»..,.n`Ca&+i Un,J3.e.EN . �::�. I,1 et el. a aP erne 1,�r Field ID Pam moalec1ee m. ! f i 3 I ; Q • ueuesxc SP VIA .-IO.cS a. bIS J 1 ✓ .1 ✓ 3 Pt)w1.-/111414:1S u'-lf IIr {I Y 111',14 •01/11,31S' I JI.IvS I I I 1 • ....,..: 1UAnaouxo eus lw,nre.oWY s Dare vxeaele,nbmeo i..: wnmxu/amnia V1 :p AwotdBy0RueeDme FIC MERCI.LA�aESULISDNL. [] 7 Day RUPPI _- n COMMERCIAL P''EueTS^Ln[CC • 9 9MEPOENC ❑REpTllryel EVE1 i1 u L D FUFl4( TI(FPA I FV . LII EMERGCNCY ____ DELAYS ❑ DMR Sample CAW,.npAI bp W bckn. APO ms YATey Pippo,papaw.,. /rRarm bPeIsvTime. Pxaved BV imPaIL6. Yflazr / Re�uwmbyDel le Received Syi Date Pm Received sY 5 7 B Lab Use Only:Cuslody seal in Place; V N Temp Blank Provided: Y N Preserved Mae ApplicableV N 'Nal 0 of Coolers Cooler Temperature(s)Caen. _QS L FA21662: Chain of Custody Page 1 of 5 so 20 of 51 •ACCIJTESTe FA21662 ACCUTEtST/LABORATORIES SAMPLE RECEIPT CONFIRMATION ACCUTESTS JOB NUMBER: P42.i Isy 1. CLIENT:=S<Scwct _PROiECI: a/h i)4 lut ' 21 .MT4t DATE/TIME RECEIVED-0 1'EL''Y. 91-4j MW,yoYY 24901 NUMBER OF COOLERS RECEIVED: 1 METHOD OF DELIVERY: (�,, k'¢DE% UPS / ACCUTEST COURIER DELIVERY OTHER: _ AIRBILL NUMBERS: 9Q4�] ?b0(g {p/Ur 7 _ COOLER INFORMATION _ TEMPERATURE INFORMATION / A. CUSTODY SEAL NOT PRESENT OR NOT INTACT _IR THERM 0) 4/ CORR.FACTOR Wil —CHAIN OF CUSTODY NOT RECEIVE (COCl _OBSERVED TEMPS: 1.`J ANALYSIS REQUESTED ES UNCLEAR ORMISSLYG _CORRECTED TEMPS: 7 SAMPLE DATES OR TIMES UNCLEAk OR MISSING SAMPLE INFORMATION — — TEMPERATURE CRITERIA NOT MET _INCORRECT NUMBER OFCONTAINERS USED —,SAMPLE RECEIVED IMPROPERLY PRESERVED TRIP BLANK INFORMATION _INSUFFICIENT VOLUME FOR ANALYSIS TRIP BLANK PROVIDED _DATESIIIMES ON COC DO NOT MATCH SAMPLE LABEL TRIP BLANK NOT PROVIDED —IDS ON COC 00 NOT MATCH LABEL — TRIP BLANK NOT ON COC _ROC VIALS HAVE HEADSPACE(MACRO BUBBLES) TRIP BLANK INTACT _BOTTLES RECEIVED BUT ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED TRIP BLANK NOT INTACT _NO BOTTLES RECEIVED FUR ANALYSIS REQUESTED _ _ ....— RECEIVED WA'ICA TRIP BLANK UNCLEAR FILTERING OR COMPOSITING INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED SOIL TRIP BLANK _SAMPLE CONTALNER(S) RECEIVED BROKEN —51.135 FIELD KITS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 48 HOURS MISC.INFORMATION BULK VOA SOIL JARS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 48 HOURS — NUMBER OF ENCORES 2 25-GRAM 5-GRAM _SA SOLIDS JAR NOT RECEIVED NUMBER OF 5035 FIELD KITS? RESIDUAL CHLORINE PRESENT LOT _ NUMBER OF LAB FILTERED METALS? IAPPLICABLLL'O EPA WnSERIEs OR.NORTH CAROLINA ORGANICS, 411 PAPER LOT8s WIDE RANGE A0361222 _ NARROW RANGE154 OTHER(WHIN) 4053J11010 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS:.2 A( en! ( n),. Wee TECHNICIAN SIGNATURE/DATE �// BevseWBA SIGNATURE/DATE _ NF 10/14 receipt confirmation 102914.xIs FA21662: Chain of Custody Page 2 of 5 MN 21 of 51 •/ CCUTEST. FA31663 """""" - Fxr,,,: ea7a = 8067 3698.6169 t 0200 &n Ba I a mll S W ,,,r,^. 4 E4mPxfiT 1 Foe +aye„ 4s rarsona= uei.. - _ - v........ ......._.. I SFrna'*v n r - me 2 Is9ve/Bally W4ene fi SpelT•II! lap/Synsra YSuem S i tvulmrOnnry we+rh a wiee>.wiaoaaaesr� .m....� .n. ""�. r •d'.�� 'l�a _i2._.L�..wr uwanruonr ui� __ _mem. y.n..............r au pvM •• L FA21662: Chain of Custody Page 3 of 5 ME 22 of 51 ACCLJTEST. Job Change Order: FA21662 1/26/2015 a Requested Deb: 1/26/2015 Received Date: 1/26/2015 Account Sn.: E Sciences,Inc Due Date: 1/2912015 Project Parking Lot&Community Center;1700 Deliverable: COMMS CSR AC TAT(Days): 3 Sample e. Change: Please change TAT to 3 day,due 1/29/15 FA21662-all Above Changes Per: Maria Paitum Date: 1/26/2015 FA21662: Chain of Custody Page 4 of 5 To Cent This Change Order is confirmation of the revisions,previously discussed wnh the Acoutest Client Sermon Page 1 of 1 IN. 23 of 51 el ACCLJTEST: FA21662 """" ' Job Change Order: FA21662 1/28/2015 Requested Dab: 1/28/2015 Received Date: 126/2015 Account Mme: E Sciences,Inc Due Date: 1/29/2015 Project Parking Lot&Community Center;1700 Deliverable: COMMB CSR: AC TAT(Drys): 3 Sample a'. Change: Please lab filter an unpreserved aliquot and FA216623 analyze for dissolved arsenic. MW3-01242015 Above Changes Per: Maria Paituvi Date: 1/28/2015 FA21662: Chain of Custody Page 5 of 5 To Clem. This Change Order is confirmation of the relsions.previously discussed win the Accutesi Client Service Page t oft 24 of 51 ACCUEST. fA21662 '""". Section 5 1111 Southeast "'• " .f ACCUTEST LABORATORIES < GC Semi-volatiles CI QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable: • Method Blank Summaries • Blank Spike Summaries • Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries in• 25 of 51 •ACCIJTEs-o FA11662 '.'.".e•" Method Blank Summary Page I of 1 Job Number: FA21662 Account: ESFLFL E Sciences, Inc Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center DL Miami Bch, FL Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch 0P54722-MB 71370630.D I 01/28/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 GTT1589 N The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: SW846 80818 FA21662-1, FA21662-2, FA21662-3, FA21662-4 CAS No. Compound Result RL MDL Units Q 309-00-2 Aldrin ND 0.040 0.0064 ug/ 319-84-6 alpha-BHC ND 0.040 0.0040 ug/ 319-85-7 beta-BHC ND 0.040 0.011 ug/ 319-86-8 delta-BHC ND 0.040 0.0079 ug/ 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) ND 0.040 0.0042 ug/ 12789-03-6 Chlordane ND 0.40 0.17 ug' 60-57-1 Dieldrin ND 0.040 0.0067 ug' 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD ND 0.080 0.010 ug/ 72-55-9 4,4'-DDE ND 0.080 0.015 ug/ 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT ND 0.080 0.010 ug/ 72-20-8 Endrin ND. 0.080 0.0070 ug/ 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.080 0.0066 ug/ 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde ND 0.080 0.0065 ug/ 959-98-8 Endosulfan-I ND 0.040 0.0066 ug! 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-Il ND 0.040 0.0080 ug/ 76-44-8 Heptachlor ND 0.040 0.0062 ug/ 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.040 0.0072 ug/ 72-43-5 Methoxychlor ND 0.080 0.010 ug/ 8001-35-2 Toxaphene ND 2.0 1.2 ug/ CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 94% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 90% 27-127% MN 26 of 51 ACCUTEST. FA21662 """"" Blank Spike Summary Page 1 of 1 Job Number: FA21662 Account: ESFLFL E Sciences, Inc Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center DrMiami Bch, FL Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch 0P54722-BS TT370628.D I 01/28/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 GTT1589 U, The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: SW846 80818 11 FA21662-1, FA2I662-2. FA21662-3, FA21662-4 Spike BSP BSP CAS No. Compound ugh ugh % Limits 309-00-2 Aldrin 1.0 100 61-126 319-84-6 alpha-BBC 1.0 100 66-129 319-85-7 beta-BHC 1.0 100 66-132 319-86-8 delta-BHC 1.0 100 41-142 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 1.1 110 68-132 60-57-1 Dieldrin LI 110 66-138 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 1.0 100 63-138 72-55-9 4,4'-DDE 0.92 92 59-133 50-29-3 4,4'-DDT 0.96 96 55-145 72-20-8 Endrin L I 110 71-147 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 0.97 97 64-128 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.82 82 60-130 959-98-8 Endosulfan-I 1.1 110 66-133 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-H 0.93 93 65-133 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.98 98 63-130 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide LI 110 67-129 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.87 87 60-136 CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries BSP Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 86% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorohiphenyl 80% 27-127% *= Outside of Control Limits. ME 27 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA21662 "'''' Blank Spike Summary Page I of 1 Job Number: FA21662 Account: ESFLFL E Sciences, Inc Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch 0P54722-BS2 TT370629.D 1 01/28/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 GTT1589 N N The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: SW846 8081 B FA21662-I, FA21662-2, FA21662-3, FA21662-4 Spike BSP BSP CAS No. Compound ugh ugh % Limits 12789-03-6 Chlordane 5 6.8 136 62-141 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 10 14.9 149 57-151 CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries BSP Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 92% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 81% 27-127% *= Outside of Control Limits. O a 28 of 51 ▪ACCLJTEST. FA21662 "..... Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary Page 1 of 1 Job Number: FA21662 Account: ESFLFL E Sciences, Inc Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Sample File ID DF Analyzed By Prep Date Prep Batch Analytical Batch 0P54722-MS TT370640.D I 01/28/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 G1T1589 0P54722-MSD TT370641.D 1 01/28/15 EM 01/27/15 OP54722 GTT1589 FA21662-4 TT370637.D 1 01/28/15 EM 01/27/15 0P54732 GTT1589 The QC reported here applies to the following samples: Method: SW846 80816 FA21662-1, FA21662-2. FA21662-3, FA21662-4 FA21662-4 Spike MS MS Spike MSD MSD Limits CAS No. Compound ug/I Q ug/1 ug/1 % ugh! ug/I % RPD Rec/RPD 309-00-2 Aldrin 0.038 U 1.92 2.4 125 1.92 2.0 104 18 61-126/21 319-84-6 alpha-BHC 0.038 U 1.92 2.2 114 1.92 1,9 99 15 66-129/23 319-85-7 beta-BHC 0.038 U 1.92 2.3 120 1.92 1.9 99 19 66-132/23 319-86-8 delta-BHC 0.038 U 1.92 2.3 120 1.92 2.0 104 14 41-142/27 58-89-9 gamma-BHC(Lindane) 0.038 U 1.92 2.3 120 1.92 2.0 104 14 68-132/22 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.038 U 1.92 2.5 130 1.92 2.2 114 13 66-138/22 72-54-8 4,4 -DDD 0.077 U 1.92 2.4 125 1.92 2.1 109 13 63-138/24 72-55-9 4,4-DDE 0.077 U 1.92 2.0 104 1.92 1.8 94 11 59-13323 50-29-3 4,4 -DDT 0.077 U 1.92 2.1 109 1.92 1.9 99 10 55-145/27 72-20-8 Endrin 0.077 U 1.92 2.5 130 1.92 2.3 120 8 71-147/23 1031-07-8 Endosulfan sulfate 0.077 U 1.92 2.2 114 1.92 2.0 104 10 64-128/26 7421-93-4 Endrin aldehyde 0.077 U 1.92 1.8 94 1.92 1.7 88 6 60-130/22 959-98-8 Endosulfan-1 0.038 U 1.92 2.5 130 1.92 2.2 114 13 66-133/21 33213-65-9 Endosulfan-11 0.038 U 1.92 2.1 109 1.92 1.9 99 10 65-133/22 76-44-8 Heptachlor 0.038 U 1.92 2.3 120 1.92 1.9 99 19 63-130/23 1024-57-3 heptachlor epoxide 0.038 U 1.92 2.5 130' 1.92 2.1 109 17 67-129/23 72-43-5 Methoxychlor 0.077 U 1.92 1.8 94 1.92 1.7 88 6 60-136/25 CAS No. Surrogate Recoveries MS MSD FA21662-4 Limits 877-09-8 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 91% 80% 109% 42-127% 2051-24-3 Decachlorobiphenyl 85% 81% 94% 27-127% *= Outside of Control Limits. 29 of 51 •▪P.CCirrasm FB41663 ......•"•••• Section 6 ■■ #x Southeast 2 ' • ACCUTEST '. LABORATORIES 1f Metals Analysis QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable: • Method Blank Summaries • Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries • Blank Spike and Lab Control Sample Summaries • Serial Dilution Summaries ME 30 of 51 ACCUTEST. 01/21/15 - Ma 31 of 51 �ACCUMEST. FA21662 ._.. 01/27/15 01/27/15 EDT, MN 32 of51 �ACCLJTEST. FA21882 "..... 01/229/15 - Cr) L .. ▪ 33 of 51 FA▪21662 '.'...." '" 31/_7/15 cn so 34 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA11688 "'"". 01,'9„5 35 of 51 •▪ACCUTEST. FA21663 "..... E: 1Li- /1 1 01/27a5 1- - .I Qt Here ileje li. -_ . 1 „_rm .J 30 Fa' 1 ma 36 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA21662 Nri-Thet: .e3 01/27/15 01/27/15 i13 _._ _r NC a i._.c ... NC = NE.' V Ccb:L NC +_.. ... ..5 n.. _ . . 57/ El .5 o... -,.. ...- _i. Icn_rr NC NC P ._. ,-. NC C9 _- a ed s •.Les VEL, 1 E"loin- c.-2, l .�.],]-A 1E1 0 Cp fs 1 v -a Pr= c+ 1_-Les 'sig 1 O M 37 of 51 •ACCLJTEST. FA21563 "''' ' '" 01/27/15 a—al da _ d Fx: FF 1— k_'mar -L:mar�. O . :ticm Ie,nd ki_ loss ass go 38 of 51 FA21660 "..... Ncc3:- Fit'-1646 _L. . 01/27/15 01 ... m.r,.- Li. _ 5) a1, __n 107.5 -c0 Hq:os.= vi..¢e. 73: va 1662 1:1: Srz1er: >)C 162.0 91-GC SLGe: 19.1 6� 98.8 92-Li Tra ie 1 39 of 51 •▪ACCUTEST. FA21662 FP erice _r(p Oar=_: 01/227/15 N ]cbJ Ior- 9—IJ t.kra ..a i de c_ 11-rss Ea 3- ME 40 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA21662 01/27/15 W. —�- ]'I m_ _d LL e kec -.. N 0.F I: _.r iJ T i:.: :.3 J 4. _.. f.. . .S 01 111.4 ___ ]<{c 1 MN 41 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA21662 . 1[:: i T _ a I nec _a__. 01/30/15 01/30/15 Lam a.__ I OI 1.3 E - J- =re: MDr JJ. ID .3 :_u,_.m.. ...a .. . _n 1,2 lade 42 of 51 ACCUTEST. FA21662 01/30/15 01/30/15 ,7 _ ._ _. -.- � ,- it �i ani N x. NC EJ ••tee^='..r a_. m ;,.r.m,m rc J] llm_re 43 of 51 S▪ACC LJTEST. FA31662 P 01/30/15 m is I L=a'=5c.ni 161,^1e �w Tit 1:i c'. T: EC IBM 44 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FAP 882 """. ' _ 01/30/15 ctke15- Cr) W tW m vel rocw F:cka_ J r3e 1 MEI 45 of 51 •ACCUTEST. FA21662 Ecec 1 .. 01/30/15 0 G A 'erl-li r is _a a iVE r' Ilei-3_ 1 she MN 46 of 51 ACCUTEST. FA31662 C -d T:.••- y kti S'� L ___, 61/30/15 a O1 _m -• . . Lr;; 104.7 1111.1 n:Lli- Cr-Jr r d Leel { ▪ 47 of 51 FA▪31661 "..... Section 7 Southeast ACCUTESTM ; LABORATORIES P}r� General Chemistry QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable: • Method Blank and Blank Spike Summaries • Duplicate Summaries • Matrix Spike Summaries M. 48 of 51 �ACCUTEST. FA21662 .nes :>HAR, r, - C ra � lr I ME 49 of 51 accumest FA21fifi3 "' " " Jct'_ � 4 �. Lr r. 4 ]xc- � .�• a -¢- _:, 1 i^t FI. p n.a N G -v T 1_, 1 1: J`IL 1 1 9]-Crq jJ ME 50 of 51 ACCUTEST. FA21662 Iv. G prtrlq ji6.2 A S J Al m J w O MN 51 of 51 �ACCUTEST. FA2166¢ •••••••••••• e-Hardcopy 2.0 Automated Report Southeast 1;. �t � • ACCUTEST LABORATORIES 02/02/15 Technical Report for E Sciences, Inc Parking Lot & Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL k . y r ' 7-0002-023 Accutest Job Number: FA21783 31111. ° ¶ Sampling Date: 01/29/15 Report to: E Sciences, Inc 224 SE 9th St Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316 mpaituvi@esciencesinc.com ATTN: Maria Paituvi Total number of pages in report: 18 Test results contained within this data package meet the requirements Norm Farmer of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Technical Director end/or state specific certification programs as applicable. Client Service contact: Andrea Colby 407-425-6700 Certifications:FL 1E83510),LA(03051).KS(&10327),IA(366).IL(200063).NC(573).NJ(FL002).SC(96038001) Don ELAP(L-A-E I.2229),CA(2937).TX(1101704404). PA(68-03573),VA(460177). AK.AR.GA.KY,MA.NV.OK.UI.WA This report shall not be reproduced,except in its entirelywithout the written approval of Accutest T.aboramnes. Test results relate only to samples analyzed. Southeast • 4405 Vineland Road • Suite C-15 • Orlando,FL 32811 • lel:407-425-6700 • fax'.407-425-0707 • hnpt//wwwaccmest.com (♦� 1 of 18 Accutest Laboratones is the sole authority for authorizing edits or modifications to this •ACCLJTEST. document Unauthorized modification of this report is strictly prohibited FA21783 '''''' Sections: Table of Contents MI Section 1: Sample Summary 3 Section 2: Summary of Hits 411 Section 3: Sample Results 5 3.1: FA21783-1: MW3-01292015 6 3.2: FA21783-1F: MW3-01292015 7 II Section 4: Misc. Forms 8 4.1: Chain of Custody 9 Section 5: Metals Analysis - QC Data Summaries 12 5.1: Prep QC MP2851 L As 13 ME 2 of 18 •ACCLJTEST. FA21783 ".......... 0 Accutest Laboratories Sample Summary E Sciences, Inc Job No: FA21783 Parking Lot & Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Project No: 7-0002-023 Sample Collected Matrix Client Number Date Time By Received Code Type Sample ID FA21783-1 01/29/15 08:30 TV 01/30/15 AQ Ground Water MW3-01292015 FA21783-IF 01/29/15 08:30 TV 01/30/15 AQ Groundwater Filtered MW3-01292015 3 of 18 FA290] "'"" "' Summary of Hits Page 1 of 1 is Job Number: FA21783 Account: E Sciences, Inc Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FI. Collected: 01/29/15 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Result/ Analyte Qual PQL MDL Units Method FA21783-I MW3-01292015 Arsenic 24.6 10 1.3 ug1l SW846 6010C FA21783-1F MW3-01292015 Arsenic 25.0 10 1.3 ug/1 SWS46 6010C ME 4 of 18 •ACCUTEST. FAP103 Section 3 Southeast IN ACCIJTEST v; '. LABORATORIES ?^r`� Sample Results Report of Analysis ME 5 of 18 •ACCUTEST. FA21783 Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of I Client Sample ID: MW3_01292015 Lab Sample ID: FA21783-1 Date Sampled: 01/29/15 Matrix: AQ-Ground Water Date Received: 01/30/15 Percent Solids: n/a Project: Parking Lot& Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Total Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Arsenic 24.6 10 1.3 ug/I 1 01/30/15 01/30/15 IN SW8466010C SW8463010A2 (I)Instrument QC Batch: MAI2190 (2)Prep QC Batch: MP28511 PQL= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDL MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< PQL 6 of 18 •▪AccurSST. FAI1753 Accutest Laboratories Report of Analysis Page I of I Client Sample ID: MW3-01292015 Lab Sample ID: FA21783-IF Date Sampled: 01/29/15 Matrix: AQ-Groundwater Filtered Date Received: 01/30/15 Percent Solids: Ma Project: Parking Lot&Community Center; 1700 Convention Center Dr, Miami Bch, FL Dissolved Metals Analysis Analyte Result PQL MDL Units DF Prep Analyzed By Method Prep Method Arsenic 25.0 10 1.3 ug/1 I 01/30/15 01/30/15 LM SW8466010CI SW8463010k2 (I) Instrument QC Batch: MAI2190 (2) Prep QC Batch: MP28511 POI.= Practical Quantitation Limit U= Indicates a result< MDI. MDL= Method Detection Limit I= Indicates a result> = MDL but< PQL 7 of 18 ACCUTEST. FP3083 ......•"•••• Section 4 Southeast • L1BOR /lTOR1ES Vp r Misc. Forms Custody Documents and Other Forms Includes the following where applicable: • Chain of Custody ME 8 of 18 •ACCLJm6St .■ ACCULeatLauuIaLU1IeS .,UULIICUJL �� -7 R Chain of Custody Accutest ( ` 4tf�> _oF_. I.ACCUTEST. <ms Vineland R0.eswn t--1c Orlando, 112x11 =*eo n.toe,ee TEL40741i-7W • FAX 4Ul42.0707 Accutest Quote. SBIFrx w* i..-,, idea.0ronnha -..e.g".4,-.4,..•R Prqut „3% ... _..? FnMxei mvm.em ....•'.. Liamix Coln Company Memo F Sc>t+Kel. tMr 1 faASw"'"vi. f OR/WO 213l WS-.@v3'fmT17'n C[nTi. OW One,ewe vi CW Gro,Webir A 4.2n1 cr 4 (ruhl `^Tic t4nvyv2mrt / TIA Paves z Veneer Cry F¢-r Uwox ,.,u,. Fl. 11,22}I1. ""Manor: aitele '''r-i Le, so soy a°l.""P4alwi Fjµ �.m G%a 4'ray?fl "9'°'R- il-�n13ce am p """4�u-4y9wv '4.54-4'dU-.5141, eft Al, t Sdi^CYndP.+-cN .re.„...„,�� ser"`. ^�_ Field to 2Puwolcmmom =wnm n. JAL. y. s v v Y F S 3 + 1— 4 w ae.M.. 1�. tLSJl ONlZ tc,t Y:WtCS'� ill Cm ✓ .J MWt-OleetPu-Z OS I J ✓ anem•.01 ,Zoic., I s_9�� 1rn-c9,t90.0iS`i J . • - .. ,. Tt4B.0040 eat taw,u Day „,,,,,. .t nae Darnels!Armin, knmMye WmC ❑ openS"""° D cuaaEACiAL A•AE00TS ONLY) /��as 0 7 BUSH __ _ Dcov+ncecre� efeEsw.TS PLUS al Nero\ Nan fl Li s Day _. _. _ ORFD.,TPAavo.at 9 e w,SM.ece.c. EFuin,p4LoisLe 9 2 Day EmEBOENCY - DevoeGa . l3.n . 0 (MICR VIA ooIaA.w.a,VIA email rSMnk _ ieOLlidied by Sampler Sarni _ �� "} v a 9gyy� w OMR erne Received By II. L i- \t//� IAA 1/:elick7a Crea..C(74.--niMise3 ...-ire*. — 042S(fm.�ao n.0 oCur RenuII.W on r RMWushed by- By 5 E>ry go4r 436 B K�,��/�/, ' ) Lab use Only:custody Seal In Plea v N Temp Pled AmuiaW: V N Preserved where Appicane V N loyal 11 of Galen: Cot CurTemperature teI Celsus. Y_ FA21783: Chain of Custody Page 1 of 3 OM 9 of 18 •ACCUTEST. FA21703 .'........... ACCUTEST LABORATORIES SAMPLE RECEIPT CONFIRMATION ACCUTF.R:S.JOB NI.MBER: b42I 783 CLIENT: F-5 G;e'.“ce- PROJECT:?aCZ:ueI�t_t. 2lrf Street DATE/TIME RECEIVED: O I-. 45 {1.0 IMMDL)YY 21001 NUN BER OF COOLERS RECEIVED: 1_ METHOD OF DELIVERY: .FET/ ZIPS ACCUTEST COURIER DELIVERY OTHER: AIRBILLNUMBERS: j7fl (c9Tl 5 S2 ___ COOLER INFORMATION _ TEMPERaIORE INFORMATION �/ A CUSTODY SEAL NOT PRESENT OR NOT INTACT _IR THERM ID I CORR.FACTOR 1'G-T CHAIN OF CUSTODYNOT RECEIVED(COC) _OHSBRVEDTEMPS: _ 2-b ANALYSES REQUESTED ti UNCLEAR OR MISSING CORRECTED TEMPS: 3 O SAMPLE DATES OR TIMES UNCLEAR OR MISSING SAMPLE INFORMATION TEMPERATURE CRITERIA NOT MET _INCORRECT NUMBER OF CONTAINERS USED SAMPLE RECEIVED IMPROPERLY PRESERVED _ TRIP BLANK INFORMATION _INSUFFICIENT VOLUME FOR ANALYSIS TRIP BLANK PROVIDED TRIP BLANK NOT PROVIDED TRIP BLANK NOT ON COC - _DATES TIMES ON COC DO NOT MATCH SAMPLE LABEL _ID'S ON COC 110 NOT MATCH LABEL —,VOC VIALS HAVE HEADSPACE(MACRO BUBBLES) TRIP BLANK INTACT _BOTTLES RECEIVED BUT ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED TRIP BLANK NOT INTACT _NO BOTTLES RECEIVED FOR ANALYSIS REQUESTED RECEIVED WATER TRIP BLANK _UNCLEAR FILTERING OR COMPOSITING INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED SOIL TRIP BLANK —SAMPLE CONTAINER(S) RECEIVED BROKEN — 5035 FIELD KITS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 4P HOURS MISC.INFORMATIONBULK VOA SOIL JARS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN JI HOURS _ NUMBER OF ENCORES? 35-GRAM S.GRAM _%SOLIDS TAR NOT RECEIVED NUMBER OF 5035 FIELD KITS? _ _RESIDUAL CHLORINE PRESENT LOT# NUMBER OF LAB FILTERED METALS" NIPLIICARLE TO EPA so fLJUES OR NORTH CAROLINA oxc,w¢p} pH PAPER LOT#s WIDE RANGE A036122 NARROW RANCE 4217547 OTHER(specify) 405-230010_ SUMMARY OE COMMENTS: TECHNICIAN.SIGNATI;RE/DATE_ / . EWERSIGNATURErDATE G D[- So-I$ HF 10/14 receipt confirmation 102914 xis FA21783: Chain of Custody Page 2 of 3 ME 10 of 18 •ACCUTEST. FA21793 A 13 0 xe :..<..„,. es -o WgYw .� �p— CI "�a iea, -'o .. S �I- ac o ' oc0 _ A JO ST 12 1 Pl W mom F z k : 1,N!;,.;-_. $ imm .; c =in JK ..5 f fy 7°1 'Jana e�. i , '_-_"--.� CO ._ M FA21783: Chain of Custody Page 3 of 3 S t 11 of 18 •ACCUTEST. FA21183 Section 5 Southeast int, ACCLJTEST :Lc,. • LABORATORIES 'j'.y.44ry Metals Analysis QC Data Summaries Includes the following where applicable: • Method Blank Summaries • Matrix Spike and Duplicate Summaries • Blank Spike and Lab Control Sample Summaries • Serial Dilution Summaries 12 of 18 •▪ACCUTES-r FA21783 3L C 01/30/15 rT.. :Li ac 3d¢__ 1 1 n/bcerJs .3 fedi i-. C11•1 _.c 1 1,M JI- ME 13 of 18 �ACCUTEST FA3fl83 01/30/1s 01/30/15 (71 N::Det>^ice u I het L�. Os r_[ c=_qc ] ME 14 of 18 ACCLJTEST. F 01/30/15 cm MSE. m 1c- doper :.al/bead-. elcri— xl:w a:_ .anadiam ME 15 of 18 •ACCLJTEST. FA21783 01/0/15 p1 ca trtri Mac]a-as.. m_ m 16 of 18 •▪ACCUTEST. FA21783 I:.: JL 01/3D/15 N arr ear 11!a l: Ma 17 of 18 Maccumest FAP993 �. , 01/30/15 N 101.1 i...� ]La-oP Li I a me = pc^•aov eda Ma 18 of 18 ACCLJTEST. APPENDIX B Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG i SfrE NAME: (* AMI 137SAyi[1. ('�1L"VIOIk!L,131•ITE 7L' Tfa LOCATION: Ml/WIZ BC/ACR 1(-L WRI NO: op, SAMPLE ID: op' . l 121 20111 DATE: I I/ 23// 14 PURGING DATA WELL ; ' TUBING Mi- WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH chi, PURGE PUMP TYPE �� DIAMETER(Rehash 4 DIAMEER(Inches? V1 DEPTH: ^7 feel to I1 feet TO WATER(feet). E E . R: OR BAILER WELL VOLUME PURGE: I WELL VOLUME= (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY (only 50 out If appl&eble) • ( l 7 feat- . ter) X ö 0.. gailonNoot = o •I. - gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: I EOUPMENT VOL=PUMP VOLUME•(TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)•FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fill out B eagles/Mr) = gallons•( gallons/foot X feet)• gallons = gallons DEPTH NUWPORTUBNG 1 FINAL PUMP OR TUBING(�� PURGING , 11 PURGING I TOTAL VOLUME p "l DEPTH IN WELL(feet): el INITIATED AT:I L-y> ENDED AT: 1011 PURGED(gellona}�I D(c RATE DISSOLVED DCUMUL. DEPTH COND. VOLUME PURGE TO dPC) aursle) OXYGEN COLOR nUTM ODOR PURGED PURGED WATER (srs a'" Jur (circle units) °(gallons) (gallons) (gum) (feet) 9S v sad etlmr (Ms) (describe) (describe) 12:5 7, 20 '7, 2D Cl, it .0 /,Yc1v,esu 124J .L1 ia,c; eLf4e . /\4ivG 1)13'1 3, 2, u7, 47 1:‘,.s, 1 r), 562.S. 7,r, l 1?_ 1ur1 i8, 1 x' ; %2 i , (0v ,la I `7,5L Sl t. 123lo 0. 3 14,0 17 ;(-0 C , iL Z, Z(. C . MA'S \ "). ,Sib IZ,3 i it), 1 ii.e`I WELL CAPACITY(Gallons Pet Foot) 0.75"=0.02; 1"=0.04: 1.25"=0.06: P•0.18; 3"=0.37; 41'=0.115: 5"a 1.02 P=1.47: 12"=5.06 TUBING INSIDE DM.CAPACITY(GaiJFt): Cr•00006: 5n6'=0.0014; 1M"=0.0026; 5/16"=0.004; 2A"=0.008: 1Q"•0010; 518"=0.016 PURGING EQUIPMENT COOS: B=Baser; BP=Blesser Pump; ESP=ENCMc Submersible Pump; PP•Peristaltic Pump, 0=Other(Specify) SAMPLING DATA I�SAMPLED0 (PRINT)/AFFILIATION: SAMBLER(J)$lGNATURE(S): SAMPLING I SAMPLING -571 nil VTNPIj6NpE A!`,�NyRI V 1V,", VJ� /t INITIATED AT:IL'.4S ENDED AT; (�,y7"Mt' PUMP OR TUBING TUBING rr I FIELD-FILTERED: Y '(W FILER SIZE: pm DEPTH IN WELL(fast): h MATERIAL CODE: P IL J Pobabon Equipment Type: FIELD DECONTAMNATION: PUMP Y TUBING e N(replaced) DUPLICATE: V `^/ SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED SAMPLING SAMPLE PUMP SAMPLE a MATERIAL PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VOL FINAL ANALYSIS AND/OR EQUIPMENT FLOW RATE IO LODE CONTAINERS WOE VOLUME USED ADDED NFIELD(mL) pH METHOD CODE int per minule) .i‘,Jf i-o),ta " ..- - p.r IL — — Pfa77.p.N P+PP 0, AA64, !;Pe-r774La..H>u, FP 17 .r,,L, MN j/ - _ .- , .An7Fr11./U.Po APP 1" REMARKS: MATERIAL CODES: AG=Amber Glass; CG=Clear Glass; PE=Polyethylene; PP=Polypropylene; S=Silicone; T•Teflon; 0=Other(Speciy) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODES: APP=After Paribas Pump; B•Baler, BP=Bladder Pump: ESP•ENCVIc Submersible Pump; RFPP=Reverse Fir„Peristaltic Pump; SM•Straw Method(Tubing Gravity Drain); 0=Other(Specify) NOTES: 1, The above do not constitute all of the Information required by Chapter 62.160,FAC. 2. STABILIZATION CRRFRIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATON OF LAST THREE CONSECUTIVE READINGS(SEE FS 2212 SECTION 3) pH:±0.2 units Temperature:±0.2°C Specific Conductance: ±5% Dissolved Oxygen:a8 readings<20%saturation(see Table FS 2200-2); optionally,•0.2 mgt or±10%(whIchever is greater) Turbidity:ag readings<20 NTU;optionaly±5 NTU or±10%(whichever is greater) Revision Date: February 12,2009 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE /�,,,�1 9/1,111. 1 i SITE ��,^t NAME: L'1 0F,PL(d CUM/T 70/1 �EMfQ 1)1 LOCATION: SAM: hFA/IU, . ;_ WELL NO: 0p_1 SMIPLE ID: 1)�i -"en/ I DATEi(i (.p/-2pl`k PURGINGPDATA WELL 7 TUBING I WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH d PURGE PUMP TYPE n DIAMETER(InS,n) /1 DIAMETER(Indies): VI DEPTH: j feet to rl feet TO WATER(feet2 rd ) OR BAILER: P1" WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME= (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY (only 1111 out if applicable) ft ( I 15. feet/ X d.IIZ, aallonarcoot • O. 1 Z gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL.=PUMP VOLUME+(TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)+FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fill out If applicable) • gelbns•( gallons/foot X feel)+ gallons = gallons INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING FINAL PUMP ORTUEING PURGING _ PURGING TOTAL VOLUME pp DEPTH IN WELL(feet): 9 DEPTH IN WELL(feet) q INITIATED AT:IZ I S S� ENDED AT:13:4 PURGED(gallons):�. 0L� CUMUL. DEPTH COND. DISSOLVED TIME VOLUME VOLUME PURGE TO pH TEMP. (circle units) OXYGEN TURBIDITY COLOR ODOR PURGED PURGED RATE WATER (Stand3" (C) Pmhoe/cm (d Luuts ) (NTUs) (describe) (describe))(pons) (gallons) (pm) (feet) units) g "sI> (h gLo ft ' 4,on 4. 00 3,13 /4S p.i ?n.?e i2S1- ici.' r$4 So.h: I�' 1 2C . ?0 6.IL) 1.S? 7A3 909 48,'1 2. 25 I`. Ti (I. t3 ',.. 40 3: 10 '? SS ?r7, 6 i3e 8,�- 2.)9 cit 7r 0 0.1a .-1, �0 . 01 J, t '2. CM 1 to-{ c.:. 2.0 'i , Sy 0. 10 I '1,9,11 22,ci (0L4 _ 1'1,9 1 ,9'1 1 WELL CAPACITY(Gallen Per Foot): On"=0.02; t"=0.04: 1.25•=0.08; 2"•0,14 3"=037; 4"=085; a"=1.02; S'=1.47: 12"=5.88 TUBING INSIDE DIA.CAPACITY(Gal./Ftj 1M'=0006: 3/16'=0.0014; 114"=0.0026; SW•0004: BT'=0.006: 112"=0.010; 5T=0016 _ PURGING EQUIPMENT CODES: B=Bailer. BP=Bladder Pump; ESP=Electric Submersible Pump: PP•Pedalaldc Pump: 0=Other(Specify) SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY(PRINT)I AFFILIATION:/ SAL/B_'LL Rib),SIGNATURE(S): SAMPLING .I SAMPLING IR.6.P.1 VIANALL alvEc(7GAci.s w L'L (La INITIATED AT: to L�K ENDED AT: Itel. b0 PUMP OR TUBING / TUBING WELD-FILTERED: Y FILTER SIZE. _nm DEPTH IN WELL(feet): q MATERIAL CODE: 4E�� Filtration Equipment Type FIELD DECONTAMINATION: PUMP Y TUBING l.Y 'N(replaced) DUPLICATE: Y fa SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED I SAMPLING SAMPLE PUMP SAMPLE Y MATERAL PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VDI. FINAL ANALYSIS AND/OR EQUIPMENT FLOW RATE IDCCOE CONTAINERS COOE VOLUME USED ADDED N FIELD(mL) _ pH METHOD CODE (mL per minute) cel,uzob..:a-,(- L Att IL — — - rcivt-nPes 11 'f o0.5t�, ,.-. DPI,- '1 D,41t^1 t Pr i z<•,L PN¢/ — _- — h\ Fn / Mfr rFp' 7% I REMARKS: MATERIAL CODES: AG=Amber Glass; CO=Clear Glass: PE=Polyethylene; PP=Polypropylene; 9=Silicone: T=Teflon; 0=Other(Spaeth') SAMPUNO EQUIPMENT CODES, APP=After Pedstalic Pump; B•Bailer; BP=Bladder Pump; ESP=Electric Submersible Pump; RFPP=Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pump; SM=Strew Method(Tubing Gravity Drain); 0%Other(Specify) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the Information required by Chapter 62-1110,F.A.C. 2. T :I TION CRITERIA Fe,: - N_ • .-CATION•F 1 h •N um. REA•N r E ECT• pH:±0.2 units Temperature:±0.2°C Specific Conductance: +5% Dissolved Oxygen:all readings<20%saturation(see Table FS 2200-2); optionally.±0.2 mgIL or±10%(whitever is greater) Turbidity:all readings<20 NTU;optionally+5 NTU or±10%(whichever Is greater) Revision Date: February 12,2009 Instrument YSI Multi Meter/Turbidity Meter Mode N'. MPS 5SE/LaMotte 1010WE ti_Ofre e.. D2 hn _.. .. .. . .. P'oleet Numher'. ` " L.U•'b^' V�.,� PARAMETER Y51 Turbidity Meter 500 us/cm I 1000 us/cm I 0.01 pH I 7 pH 10 pH I 100%sat. I ORP 00 NT➢ I 10 O ATV Date&Time J I( b(yath ' -,3- INSTRUMENT tINSTRUMENT RESPONSE CwD3, [...e"CC 7.0 g,'11 ''el.0 -^ t.'! %DEVIATION 30/ ‘/C CALIBRATED(YES or NO) 5(5 (CS 'G: TYPE 11C ICV CCVI L _ ( - - � �C i e SAMPLER INITIALS na 71 --' ZY r/ - i — , `L Date&-hole. itt./z.;(.( 3C _ INSTRUMENT RESPONSE 's. C. i 3, j( ^T _ 10.33 -101.1 '" � .Q'. v,.'vJY %DEVIAPON ' CALIBRATED(YES or NO) ,`E 'L�,i ^ -f TYPE IICJN�LCN) Y- / 1 Y� a / ^ Y- -i � : � SAMPLER INITIALS .. I —ll _r\/ Date&Mme'. 11JI9/2JM I').CD T� INSTR MENT RESPONSE U��tv' 1 C18Lk Q W , LO '7, 3 'C., _ _ — O - %DEVIATION 11 ,0 Z.Xn 7%n. t'S CALIBRATED(YES or NO) °--/E^, 'IES '€c • 'iF ' TYPE114R5CCV) 1 ' J rY 1 ( `/ '( �'( / 7 — SAMPLER INITIALS J 4 J "'J `-T, ,i T'l ^ ✓ I Date&Tlme. 1V/2t/2:+ 4 0.d, ©, STP MEM RESPONSE - r r( .)C' %DEVIATION 1 -' � .� '� `` CALIBRATED(YES orNO) `I P' 'i ' 'L v 't C.( TYPE 141CVCCV) / / • 1ki v.... "r LE SAMPR INITIALS 7 / ) tet,4 ( C / ` /r n KZ/ Date&Time:1Cl2\1n,A I'1:3n INSTR1MENT RESPONSE1cv•."Y, '-- u1 / %DEVIATION 7°' „ ...) 'V CALIBRATED(vEs or NOl "f- Ni)r, .SCi \.r' — ( TYPE(ICICV.CCV) 1 7 _I SAMPLER INIM6 "'/ `, I -- 1 -`/ '` J s,/ " <..J —;t Date&Tlme INSTRUMENT RESPONSE %DEVIATION CALIBRATED(YES or NOI TYPE ICICV,CCV) SAMPLER INITIALS l/writ UONTU T10 NTU ItY 500 us/<m 1PoOusRm pNam pH/,00 ary LO.w a/water DRP xm mV 1 Samara [muoann t. Loa 3Ft-eat SE jLib. r, _-It4'7 - - — — Yeat 4c 13 Expiration Date I/2 C 2p)c -Cr it itL ci2 •tc i '^ L =L ` /"'WM ./5X of std •/5%ot std /0z ofAa dz of std .ba.E Of sta / 10%of ne ./-10%of std Acceptance Criteria value value value value value 98.100% value value Peram*.laum±wmt reponse-fro nnel/SW.awel•ZOO Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE D SITE NAME: ID/4icr.W! LT LOGTick I°IT/hoi 1060.1,4° , FL 1 WELL NO: hlyy -4I SAMPLE WA: iv I - O/ L(J2ll, DATE; t/LEI/ta)1 - PURGING DATA WELL ,.... TUBING ( WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH ) PURGE PUMP TYPE PP DIAMETER(Mciwa): I. DIAMETER(Indies):/C) DEPTH: T %Nb i c feet TO WATER(tort): -1. 0 S OR BAILER: WELL VOLUME PURGE: I WELL VOLUME (TO AL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY (My Ml out if applicable) `I_ 1M- feel) X galons/ool • galore EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 EQUIPMENT VOL=PUMP VOLUME r(TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)♦FLOW CELL VOLUME (only PI oval applicable) ,1 •� . _cal 02J...<( 02J... g•bnRoot X LO feel)+ a/IL gallons Di v4 gallons INIrIAL PUMP OR TUBING FINAL PUMP OR TUBING PURGING i(reY PURGING TOTAL VOLUME DEPTH IN WELLteet): I0 DEPTH IN WELL(Met): 10 • WRWTEDAT:'. ENDED AT: icD.JO PURGED(galons): Z•3J CUMUL. DEPTH COND. DISSOLVED TIME VOLUME VOLUTE PURGE TO diTEN". (don(G, units) OXYGEN TURBIDITY COLOR ODOR PURGED PURGED RITE WATER (atendnd ("G) ymlowcm Nada urns) (gallons) (gallons) (qpm) (Ml) units) (WWI (deaalbe) (describe) 9;51 i, l , bo 3,10 0 SIC(Et? LPn� S ta,�Z '1q„ i IZoo33, I a z,tokI CL FAA_ NoNI- S°,5�t_0, 3J i.so DAD � /.2c .6-i 9aSe•12olS'2S n, '2. its 3. to b Lot „l EP ,C a 2.0 1-1 3NA. o '0. U 2 o 0 -, ' l 6„. 7-1 • a (2a)- (1. ,(7 WELL CAPACITY(Gallon Per Fool): 0.7r.0.0B 1^=0.64; 1.2r-006: r=0.16: 3"=0.31; P=085; P=102; o•1.47; 12 •515 TUBING WSmE DIA.CAPACITY(GaIJFt): III 0.0CW; Nair=Darn 1M^•0.0026; 5/10'=0.004;_ MP*COM 112 0.010; or•0.016 PURGING EQUIPMENT CODES: B=Bailer BP•Bladder Pump; ESP Bent Submersible Pump: PP•Pawl/rale Pump; 0•Other(Spedly) SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY(PRINT)/AFFILIATION: SAA(1ly/L}Rt3 SIS�IpN�AfT DELIS): _ IaEPil4AN/�.LE liafjS 1/Y. ✓/4W`a, WRNTEDAT:Iu•D11i ENDEDLINAT: jl) ADS. PUMP OR TUBING TUBING • FIELCSILTEREO: T 0 FILTER SIZE: pm DEPTH IN WELL(feel): ((7 9,MATERIAL CODE: P E Fipadon Equipment Typp FIELD DECONTAMINATION: PUMP Y TUBING cq N(mapnced) DUPLICATE: Y u SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION - LYSIINTES AD SAMPLING SFLOW RATE SAMPLE Y MATERIAL VOLUME PRFSERVATNE TOTAL VOL FINAL ANALYSIS AND/OR EQUIPMENT FLOW MLE O DUDE CONTAINERS CODE USED ADDED IN PELD(mLL pH METHOD CODE (mL per NNW Naii.i.- 7V UK` "I I PP kon,t_ RP), — (14141 Iloe riG4�c p.. t44 tV1?a;rlii 1 RL 't cOmt. -- I- t 572 Ctf) +1J Hi WO,wi)41,0 S•k 1_ Pi? 1:11-ML:L, — - fi ,pSIF,/uMb/a? I M1W o0A.120tc-‹ L__PP \ljZzmo, t-1,53I�9AN 1+�1! Z REMARKS: MATERIAL CODES: AG•Amber Glees; CO•04w Gasp PE=Polyethylene; PP•Polypropylene; S•Slane; T•Teflon; 0.Other(Spetlty) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODES: APP•After Pemddalic Punp; B•BMlag BP•Bladder Pump: ESP=EMCYNSubmersibl Plmp; RPM•Reverie now PerMMMc Pump; SM•Stew Method(TI<Mg Gorey Dnln); 0.Other(Specify) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the Information required by Chapter 62-130,FAC. 2. STAB)]DATION G,RITFRIA FOR RANGE OF VARIATIONCc UST TNREECONSECUTNE READPIGS(SEE FS 2212 BECTON m'/] pH:±02 oohs Temperature:v 0.2°C Specific Conductance: ±5% Dissolved Oxygen:all readings<20%saturation(see Table FS 2200-2); optionally,±0.2 mg/L or±10%(wnlchever is greater) Turbidity,ell reading,a 20 NYU;opllonaly±5 NM or±10%(whichever is greeter) Revision Date: February 12,2009 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE q r� NAME: pi) SITE 1-4/7 LOCATION: NI 743 Flat, QCP Cifjr WELL NO: /LA W" I - DATE: I/ .LI/2'aI T sAnPLEa Med— 012L1�,D•s PURGING DATA WELL TUBING t WELL SCREEN INTERVAy STATIC DEPTH +� PURGE PUMP TYPE DIAMETER(inches): I,11 DIAMETER(Inches): !4 DEPTH:S feet lo I°) Mt TO WATER Net): t, /� OR BALER: PP WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME= (TOTAL W LL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY (only Bel Bute appll®de) • ( Nat- reel) X gallonstloct = gelpne EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: 1 ECUIPMENT VOL=PUMP VOLUME r(TUOING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH).FLOW CELL VOLUME (emy nn oviX app*rable) • \ Pions•(Fj C1) IbnalcalX •'Zz NM). (); 1 Z V I. i lame INITIAL PIMP OR TUBING FINAL PUMA OR TUBING PURGING PURGING (,s p TOTAL VOLUME DEPTH IN WELL(kMk DEPTH IN WELL(temp kOD INITIATED AT:IJ'.11 ENDED AT: OE) .c PURGED(Womb I. j CUMUL. DEPTH COND. DISSOLVED t TIME VOLUME yam* PURGE t0 (Sand y�� TONP. (cede units) 0%YGEN TURBIDITY COLOR WOR (penonaPURGEO (9 lonPURGEa GPT) (test)R utile) .( C) (cclmi'g,,�°) (NIUs) (describe) (OeeCW) • �'•'t L'ro eaWn0or1Y (O'LY Iirl Irl h 6.OR -i,1 I ,C .) >i LLEA& n.t ( 13.11 3.2f 144 O.01 2 -4 6,5-1 ZSgIQ ZVSaiD l-)./t 6,`l . LI,so3 --)1 1 ,Z] PLP1 I.\ t.Yd.; , 2_36 Qri < 6. LS 'L3:%1 0, 17 I , 1_5 0 ,0(1 l_n l L.Sri/MS 7n357 (1.? C,ct WELL CAPACITY(Gellert Per Fool) Oar=0.02; 1"•0.04: 1AC•0.081 S"=0.15: 3"=037;- Y•0.65: P=1.02; M••1.47; It•52B TUBING INSIDE OIL CAPACITY(Gdjft, 1T-0.0005; dnP•0.0014; 1M"•0.0025; 511"=0.004;_ SS"•p.005; 10'=0010; MP.5016 PURGING EQUIPMENT CODES: B=Bake BP•Bladder Pump; ESP=Electric Submersible Pam; PP•PMcyrk Pump; 0.Other(Specify) SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY RIND I AFFILIATION: SAM/PLy$RO SWIGQNAT,U1n((S): SAMPLING Ta):,NT nitIA54i C]. eFTral , V1 V[k,W 1 INITIATED AT:1 J) )Y, ENDED D AT:ING icy.A4o PUMP OR TUBING TUBING FELD.FILTERED: Y FILTER SIZE: DEPTH IN WELL(feet): Ill MMTERML CODE: Pc: FPEafbn ER99mwm Type. SVT FIELD DECONTAMINATION: PUMP Y LPL) TUBING )3 N(replaced) DUPLICATE: Y SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION WENDED SAMPLING MEN SFLOWRPUMP TE SAMPLE a MATERIAL PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VOL FINAL ANALYSIS AND/OR EQUIPMENT FLOW RATE 0030E CCNTMNERS _ LODE VOLUME USED ADDED IN FIELD(mL) I pH (ml �,TMETHW coo.E(' per menMe) 511b(.-122413:•)41 1 PQ L�OOnfl Yt�-i - - Mcte4� pee .,10 N,4-..;1i42U1•Li Z F14 ZS'nL - PEStce-> 341 ihrt PRWI s>_atc45•Y r FP 125,n - — - Ab TsATt//13"fg-TRF M-Iz--1iv)-D s-; 1 �a aS,^1/4. Fl,t - - i\MnemWO( -, REARS: MATERIAL COORS: AG•Amber Gees; CO=Clear Blase; PE•PLMMITwne; PP•Pd)yrcpyl.n S•Silwne; T•Teflon; 0.ORer(Spedry) SAMPUNG EQUIPMENT CODES: APP=AflerPerisWOcPump; ••Baler, BP•aedder Punp; ESP•Electric Submersible Pump; RFPP•Reverse Flow Park's*Pump; SM•Stew Method(Tubing GravityDSO; 0.Othr(Speedy) NOTES: 1. The above do not consmute ell 011th Information required by Chapter 52-160,FAC. 2. STABS I,ATrelCRITFRM FOR RANGE OF VMMTICH OF LAST THREECONSECUTIVE READINGS(SEE_FS 22,12.SECTION 3) pH:•0.2 units Temperature::0.2°C Specific Conductance: •5% DNsoWad Oxygen:al mange w 20%saturation(see Table FS 2200-2); opfmaIN,±0.2 mg&L or.10%(whichever re greater) Turbidity:al readings.020 NTU:opOwuly±5 MTU or±10%(whichever Is greater) Revision Dale: February 12,2005 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG SITE NAME:1, 5v Strz=E7 (newt/v.2_74 C£vTFn Co yxy�L�urlaN: /fit z/ar+,) pr.A ( 1 CI WELL NO: NCd_-; SAMPLE ID: twki 3.0 I ?Li 2 , DATE: IILLIIt UIc PURGING DATA WELL / TUBING I WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH r, PURGE PULP TYPE �� DIAMETER(hchel): I, ) DIAMETER ry-M.X �L( DEPTH: C per b I r MI TO WATER(feN': 3.U'"1 OR BAILER: WELL VOLUME PURGE: 1 WELL VOLUME= (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY only(a on applicable) • 1_ feet- feel)_ X gonna/NM a galore EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: I EQUIPMENT VOL.=PUMP VOLUME•(TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)•FLOW CELL VOLUME (only Ill out B appiCabl) - k gaKMm.l'').o. (pgaRaaapaX to keI)•S,, i paeans 1')gams INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING FINAL PUMP OR TUBING I .!' TOTAL VOLUME DEPTH INWELL(leap: IL� DEPTH IN WELL Peet): ILS t IINMMATE°AT:''•ty( ENDED AT:{1, TOTAL PURGED(0411008: CUMUL. DEPTH COND. 1DISSOLVED TIME VOLUME VOLUME PURGE TO TEMP. (circle units) OXYGEN TURBIDITY COLOR COQ2 PURGED PURGED RATE WATER lewder. (OC) prawn ( IAB tuts) (galtau) (9.om) (spm) poet) units) (NNaI IdeavLe) (Owame) 1Ix0o t, c i (. i . I I 31� C.S ��(.L ?) L I I 0...,,_ !,{fie Nnur ;('.0i 133 I,9 ,T,t1 SLI) .r.{ .by ?AL2: ( , 3 �I/ It .1:1 o.i3 ;. tl —0, 11 S.� 9{ ?.°i.L� T41La 13.E `-t124 r U'Dti 6,i1 1 , C,M ciIt _.IO („c Litt 34fi;I R.-) q ,34 WELL CAPACITY(Gallons Per Rapp: 0.78••0.02; 10ss•=0.6; P•0.16; i'=037; P•0.85; P=1.02; P•1.47; 1T=SAS TUBING INSIDE DIA.CAPACITY GaI.IFL): 111 1.: 04;{•.00014;_ 1W•0.0026; NIP=0.004; EM••0006; lit=0010; Sr•0.016 PURGING EQUIPMENT CODES: B=Batten BP•Bladder Pump; ESP•EIea,t SubmersOI Pump; PP•Peristaltic Pump; 0=Other(Specify) SAMPLING DATA )S MPLEO1B/Y(PRINT)/AFFILIATION: SA�Mp/LER(B1/yDNA/Ji (S): SAMRMG 1. (ret \Mr. lLL38Y CLEiViL -(_ 2y Ili INITIATED AT:I I( ENDED AT: PUMP OR TUBING /L F S TUBING M l� ENDEDAT:II.1 �' DEPTH IN WELL(lest): i� MATERIAL CODE: P FW.Ecn Equipe: V 'all FILTER SDE: wpm C Fnlreltn D: Type: car FIELD DECONTAMINATION: PUMP V TUBING N(replced) DUPLICATE: y SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION _ INTENDED SAMPLING SAMPLEPUMPSAMPLE a ll4TEPMl VOLUME PRESERVATNE TOTAL VOL FINAL ANALYSIS AND/OR EQUIPMENT FLOW RATE ID LE CIXRAIIERS CODE USED ADDED N FELDAmLL pH METHOD CODE (mL Par WNW Nu3'e,t+l.*:-t v FSP �omt. } MEAL} P?p -+o.Locy., 1,..z.„ t41,to-l.s L_ A(( 2SOjk IwU Pcs rwT eco Mw3.,ltvtbr ;= \ ( _ Pc �LS^L ` - - Rh,aov.,,�`yy�//AJ„R21 CI m\„a i'�ILvzOii,.s I f0 Z .ITL. � ., - CYN,rNN;,a REMARKS: MATERIALCGOES: AG•Amble Glen; CO•Clear GMM; PE•Pct.el4.ne; PP t-Pdypmpy1MIK 5•Slice..; T•Teflon: 0.Other(Spiffy) SAMPLING!MOMENT CODES: APP•Agar Per is Pump: B•Baler, 6P•SWOP Pump: ESP•pectic Sutmn a Pin ; RPM•RMarse Flow PMMMIM Pump: SM•Stew Who”(Tubing GmByDnYII: 0.Other(Specify) NOTES: 1. The above do not constiWM all of BM inMmaBen required by CMptsr 62-180,FAC. 2. 1_- •.. a:MF•.: :..• • V.[ sn• r • cafu R :n..<. e ... pH:±0.2 unite Temperature:±0.2 t anodic Conductance:a•5% Dissolved Oxygen:al readings<20%saturation Ree Tabs FS 2200-2); op6onaly,.0.2 moll w!10%(whichever Is greater) Turbidity:ell readings<20 MU;optionaly±5 NTU Or±10%(whichever a greeter) Revision Date: February 12,2009 Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOG G2 $ ElNAE: I TJWES-r (o//1ML/1zi • /1N741 to? LLOGATett 1211i.2 / I elCifIF WELL No: iv! I<J_Li jSMPLE D: Mvy- U( ZYZOIcDA E: yZ4 /jC l\ PURGING DATA WELL. , TUBING I WELL SCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH fPURGE PUMP TYPED DIAMETER(wchn): ..5 DIAMETER iindMa): DEPTH: 5 NM IS bet TO WATER(feet): ( (/D OR BAILEPUMPF? WELL VOLUME PURGE: I WELL VOLUME• (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY (only lull of N appliWOM) 1 feel- leaf) X sellamMooi = galloons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE; f EQUIPMENT VOL.=PUMP VOLUME•(TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)•FLOW CELL VOLUME (oNy fill CIA if appicebl) 1_ galena•ic,,wu.SabnstbcX Zo teat)• C)rlj galls•.1.l7 gallons INRLLL PUMP OR TUBINGFINAL PUMP OR TUBING PURGING PURGING TOTAL VOLUMEVOLU DEPTH IN WELL(fret} sO DEPTH IN WELL(NM)'. 10 - INITIATED AT: II I; //- ENDED AT: I. YK PURGED(Sore):);a, CUMUL. DEPTH COND. DISSOLVED TIME VOLUME VOLUME PURGE TO (WMMd TEMP. (circle units) OXYGEN TURBIDITY COLOR ODOR (PURGED PURGED RATE WATER units) CC) VmlgsY(�� (Girds units) MLS) ((Mabel (clemlea) (0110m41 (1211m) The) QLD 10 ninon. • 2b 21 ? (O Ila - • . s o J, 1 01LFV•L li: 2,110 [lge�� Sa71ItI+f11t1�� 11 .4c_ 3,e10 0, Ir) (4d). -LI 3 Z6,to ILi ILI L(,,. - WELL CAPACITY(GVIbre Per Foot): 0.75"•002 1••0.04; 1.2r•0.06 Ma 0.113; r•037: r•0.05; r=1.02; I••1.47; 1r•SM TUBING INSIDE DIA.CAPACITY(GaLIFL): 1A'•0.0006: 3f6••000141 lel••0.0026; S1r•OEM; N••11.006; 141'=0.010; Sar•0A,6 PURGING EQUIPMENT CODES: B=Baibc BP=Bladder Pump; ESP=Eluct Submersible Puny; PP•Perla-lath Pup; 0.Other(Spey) SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY(PRINT)/AFFILIATION: SAbP{ERLLS S NATURE(S) . /n ' /:/< //�� //�� SAMPLING SAMPLING F,(V? TUBING / TUBING FIR.FILTEREO: Y 'V!^i' FILTER SIZE: Vm DEPTH W WELL peat) Ip MATERIAL CODE pc FMBen EgbmmeniType: FELD DECONTAMINATION: PUMP Y (a TUBING Cr) N(replaced) DUPLICATE: Y ',a SAMPLECONTAINERSPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED SAMPLING SAMPLE PUMP SAMPLE ♦ MATERIAL VOLUME PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VOL FINAL ANALYSE ANS EQUIPMENT FLOW RATE D WWO OE COI/TAPERS E USED ADDED IN FIELD(mLL pH METHOD CODE (mL perp tze) PIiW 0 2YZGaii PP m ml 1-04. 1 — _METAL'S AoO ,t O:k� *Nit,'lvxm > z AC_ 2i0(,-'1/4.. — — _ — _ PFszi,--ia5 i In' N1Nv-01-%3.3:5;14 ( re j?S ml -- — fi]FA�(1(r.CzlfyS� 1Vlw4.vi.vtal.i i 40 IIs-mTI An_5)4 __ iirok..,\ REMARKS: MATERIAL CODES: AG•Arbor Ghn; CO=Clear Mew PE•Polyethylene; PP•PoyyopNme'. I•SumN; T•Teflon; O.Other(SWIM SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODES: APP•Misr Peristaltic Pump: B.Bab; UP•memo Punp; ESP•Ehchk Summons,Puny; RFPP•Reverse now Pedant Pune: SM•Soave Method(R.1%&MILT Drain); 0.Other(Sp0L1fy) ' NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the Information required by ChapOr 32.150,FAC. o . tit. pet:±0.2 units Temperature:4-0.2 t Specific Conductance: ±5% Dissolved Omen:al readings•20%salutation(see Table FS 2200-2); optionally.±0.2 mg/L or±10%(whichever IS greater) Turbidly:al readings<20 NTU;optimally•5 NTU or±10%(whichever is greater) Revision Date: February 12,2009 Instrument:YSI Multi Meter/Turbidity Meter Mode 0: YSI MPS 556/LaMotte 2020WE I Sole ems __— _ Project Number -0..c2- 02-(7 PARAMETER _ _ YSI Turbidity Meter 500 us/cm 11000 us/cm I 4.01 pH I TPN I 10 pH 1 100%sat. 0.0 NTLI 1100 NTU Date&Time: 1/2.M/2cc< 7:3o INSTRUMENT RESPONSE _500 9C,,tei ll 400 '1,:3 , IpC4 9' 3 i 10-or %DEVIATION o% U% cri 0% 01' O'7,. (ft O CALIBRATED(YES or NO) Yies V(. `ire Yes Ys `!ex B;B' `(ES rYpEUc,Icv,cM Gc a< "It 1t .t 7c 1rr it SAMPLER INITIALS 'V 'V q -,:V TV YJ TV -TV Date&nate: 1/24/2dt a Z',coc INSTRUMENT RESPONSE '-f C,(p (Jc5 3.96 208 IO.o\ 99, 4 0.01 0,,94 %DEVIATION )`'c (°L I%„ I0/r, O'(- O°/- O%. I °A. CALIBRATED IVES or NO) `!I• Yet, Yes Vey YR `In YC, 4Fe TYPE 0C,1CV,CCVI I(B./ v rtV Toe ZtV cV TcV EV ; SAMPLERINITIALS T T,,I Iy TV TV 7V 'V -TV Date&rime:\/24 bee f /(r',OO /� INSTRUMENT RESPONSE 5O 1G1I a,CI N) 9.94 eQ,2- `�,,-Bt., hiC4 %DEVIATION c�'1 , te _ t- 1 % l% I n (Yea 17,, Oc CALIBRATED(YES or NO) '''ht 'l(' Yec }15 Yes yd's 'Y$ . -itt TPE(141CV.CCV) (C'/ Ytl/ (IV (t Lf (IV CL LLJ CLJ SAMPLER INITIALS 4V -- ,I j y -.E. v Iv TV Iv i1✓ 100%10G0rurNGty mosey 500 us/cm 1pus/cm pH 401 pH 7.00 pH 1000 air/water r 10 NYU Standard satuadon Lot Expiration Date ./-5%of sat 4/-5%of std 4-02 of HLz of +70.2 of H.10%of ♦1-10%of Acceptance Critena value value std value std value std value 98-100% std value std value e.kn<emaue•Rix,ra,ew-'Tonkel/$TO nIej x wo Form FD 9000-24 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING�pLOG SITE i::a/ ]1<!"I 1 J•NsvhN . 7i 4 OA 7-97 Zo- LOCATION: /424/v17 RIA,ii r L WELL NEP 7YII�/ , SAMPLE ID: NIL/3 .Jf Z..q&DIA DATE: 01/211/ 101< PURGING DATA t WELL TUBING I WESCREEN INTERVAL STATIC DEPTH PURGE PUMP TYPE [gip DIAMETER(Inches): I'S.- DIAMETER(Inca):/L( LL DEPTH : si Net to I r feet TO WATER(feet):3 C Z OR BAILER i WELL VOLUME PURGE: I WELL VOLUME= (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - STATIC DEPTH TO WATER) X WELL CAPACITY (only MI out((applicable) _ ( feet- feet) X gallons/foot • gallons EQUIPMENT VOLUME PURGE: I EQUIPMENT VOL.=PUMP VOLUME a(TUBING CAPACITY X TUBING LENGTH)•FLOW CELL VOLUME (only fill out If applicable) • \ gallons a(7,..T.)/C, gallons/foot X -7 O feet).,-,.. IR gallons 1 i gaAns INITIAL PUMP OR TUBING FINAL PUMP OR TUBING PURGING r-y, PURGING p p TOTAL VOLUME DEPTH N WELL(feet): I . DEPTH IN WELL(feet): I0 INITIATED AT:I r.ss ENDED AT: 0. C 1 PURGED(gallons): 3,jg i CUMUL. DEPTH COND. DISSOLVED VOLUME VOLUME PURGE TOpH TaMP. (Patio units) OXYGEN TURBIDITY COLOR ODOR TIME PURGED PURGED RATE WATER ( Muni"—ts) th ( C) yrostcm (p ug) (Neta) (describe) (describe) (gallas) (gallons) (owl (feet) 2® iciaturaPA 9'2, S 3„I5” 3L.1 _5.-lc v'-1 l'1LK, 35311_ it .c 3.5'-1 C‘Lae. M-e S 73 D.:.1/4 3. M e_ (Y) 3.2< rimo Thrice) 3ti7% ii i 3,'—n I & 26 '311 31rSTQ1 D o') 2.2C 5=tee) /MCIIi_3 3C0 iO. o 3 )0 S. )y 3.1.1/4 .3173 '1.01 Z -7 2C cc,fo ').`1c 33\"'1 L1 c WELL CAPACITY(Gallons Per Foot): 0.75"=0.02; 1"•0.04: 1.25'=0.06, 2"a 0.16; 3'=037; 4"=0.65; 5"•102: 5'=1.47; It•5.88 TUBING INSIDE GIA.CAPACITY(Gal./Ft.): 1M'=0.0006; 3115'=00014: 114'=0.0026; 5/16'•0.004; 3A'=0008; VT =0.010; 5T'=0016 PURGING EQUIPMENT CODES: B=Sailer; SP=Bladder Pump; ESP=Electric Submersible Pump; PP•Perls*Ok Pump: O=Other(Specify) SAMPLING DATA PLED BY RINT)f AFFILIATION: SA R(S) IGNATURE(S): /(� /// ( / SAMPLING v SAMPLING y I({fN' V^n AA 1,‘0116 Cs !S V� INITIATED AATT:0.30 ENDED AT:J',LkD PUMP OR TUBING TUBINGFIELD-FILTERED: I r' N FILTER SIZE: I ym DEPTH IN WELL(feet): I0 MATERIAL CODE: ]'�rE V\ Flltretbn Equipment we'. , ,1\ FIELD DECONTAMINATION: PUMP V C)TUBING N(replaced) DUPLICATE: V SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATION SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED SAMPLING SAMPLE PURR SAMPLE N MATERIAL PRESERVATIVE TOTAL VOL FINAL ANALYSIS AND/OR EQUIPMENT FLOW RATE l0 CODE CONTAINERS CODE VOLUME USED ADDED N FIELD(mL) pH METHOD CODE (mL per minute) 111w 3.:12 t>1j-t i PP Sr\i PI 1/4.. HA3; — /VAC Tra.5 Aff 3..0'15f,m Niw3r 2920,,,.t i r0 Cir)rnL^ NyJO-, --- i MFliAl ntP O a'i ff,r., REMARKS-. \ MW7,-3}25k201 C- 2. LD 13LTFnED (i A.4.,') MATERIAL CODES: AG=Amber Glass: CC=Clear Glass: PE=Polyethylene; PP=Polypropylene: 9•Silicone; T=Teflon; 0=Other(Specify) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CODES: APP=After Peristaltic Pump: B=Sailer BP=Bladder Pump; ESP=Electric Submerse*Pump; RFPP=Reverse Flow Peristaltic Pulp: SM=Straw Method(Tubing Gravy Drain): 0.Ober(Specify) NOTES: 1. The above do not constitute all of the Information required by Chapter 62-150,FAC. 2. T T F E V N THH N EE F 1 pet:±0.2 units Temperature:±0.2°C Specific Conductance: ±5% Dissolved Oxygen:all readings<20%saturation(see Table FS 2200-2); optionally.±0.2 mgt or±10%(whichever is greater) Turbidity:all readings<20 NTU;optionally±5 NN or±10%(whichever is greater) Revision Date: February 12,2009 Accutest Laboratories Southeast .E Chain of Custody Movies!JOB# FAQ�OF 5 ACCLITESTt aVineland nsBur,Suite C-15 Orlando,tY salt ...ow..aw�.e 76.407-425-6700 • FAX:407-425-0707 Accutest Quote# ISKIFff# wwwaccutestCMnl R.pwtry lrlwm¢trm Rge'a Wamab>.rom Mit 11th'tim Mt C Company Nene P�gelxere: I ow.deism was ow-aRene ewer mYs SO.as JR cP ww.vas µ1-®M Rma Cama Emil Purls• Ps timid Fa uo-n -a..M aeeMMe ed a +InaOwed) creed .p-yy ReReeeteumwee I A,a. flaw ID r Polnl of Collection � _deem .. ,wee d R 4 i leeueav TURNAROUND The(Business Ay) DSO Deewie Ion uwnnulRev4 MPv.M n/I I Pali Coda ❑COMERCIALW((E&ATS Oetil El 10 Days Sanded LI 7 Cay PUSH ❑COMMERCIALS((RESULTS nus cc) El 5 Day RUSH __.._. __. _ ❑RECTI(EPA LEVEL 31 3 ay EMERGENCY _ 2 Day"'ERGENCY ❑fVLTI(EPALEWL 41 ❑ I Day EMERGENCY ._ _ ❑EDD'S El OTER Envenom-0r Ran TRA Data available VIA Email w Waive Mdo-,.rened below a.h time even*,meas .aincludesoc®Pn. no cedar delivery. Relinquished by Saryl.: Dale litre RMIMd Ba'. Relinquished by: Date lime: Received By'. 2 3 4 Relinquished by. Dan lime: R.csved By- Relinquished by: Date This Received By. 5 6 7 IB Lab Us.Only:Custody Seal In Place: Y N Tena Blank Prowled: V N Preserved wtweApoIabk'. Y N Total not Cao/as: Curler Temperature(s)Celsius: APPENDIX C Florida Department of Environmental Protadon-Division of Waste Management-Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems WELL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT LOG WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA Well Number: Site Nee FDEP Facility LD.Number Well Install Date(s): MA/ -1- P1ck2u I nr If23) 2o1S Well Landau and Type(check appropriate bones): Well Purpose: ❑perched Monrcaing Well Install Method: ®Of-SRe 0 Right -ofN Shallow(Water-Table)Monitoring DP-r ❑Off-Site Private Pmperu/ ❑Intermediate or Deep Monitoring 0 Above Grade 0 Rtlsh-to-Glade 0 Remedlatlon or Other(desalbe) Surface Casing Install Method: If AG,list feet ofdrerabox land surf. �_...______ Borehole Depth Well Depth Borehole Diameter Manhole Diameter Well Pad Size: (feetL ): I 1 (fee* 15. (inches): 3.Z< (inches) 1 feet by I feet Riser Diameter and Material:y aRises/Scree 0 Rush-Threaded Riser Length: ; feet I. 5 y wP L A — t. Connavo s: ❑Other(desolbe) from 0 feet to S fret Scrag Diameter and Material: Screen Slot Size: Scree Length: )O feet I .5 INCH ' PPaLPAn-, J.Cll jN:.N fmm S fee to 1'S feet I"Surface Casing Material: 1st Surface Casing LD.(inches): 1"Surface Casing Length: _fat also check: 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to _feet 2s4 Surface Casing Material: 2°d Surface Casing I.D.(inches): 2"°Surface Casing Length: _feet also cheek: 0 Permanert ❑Temporary from 0 feet to _fat 3'a Surface Casing Mewl: 3"'Surface Casing l.D.(inches): 31"Surface Casing Length: _feet also check OPmnanertt ❑Tanporaw from 0 feet _feet Filter Pack Material and Size: Prepacked Filter Around Screen(check one): Filter Pack Length: i0 feet 3 SANG 51 Yom 0 N from '\ feet to I'S fect Filter Pack Sal Material and Filter Pack Seal Length: S feet Size: i<"3`GS S(•SIN q from I feet tofeet Surface Seal Material: Surface Seal Length: _feet C}r,CUr I/P Ai LAIN() 6 f M<fJ i from 47.1 feetto ( feet WELL DEVELOPMENT DATA Well Development Date. Well Development Method(check one): U Surge/Pump [Pump D Compressed Mr /2.3J N( 5 ❑Other(describe) Development Pump Type(check): ®centrifugal 0 Peristaltic Depth to Groundwater(before developing in feet): ❑Submersible ❑Other(describe) ') Li I Pumping Rate(gallons per minute): Maximum Drawdown of Groundwater During Well Purged Dry(check one): 0 3— tler\ Development(feet):), a ' ❑Yes PNo Pumping Condition(check one): Total Development Water Development Duration Development Water[named m Continuous 0 Intermittent Removed(gallons): i (minutes): LQ (check one): Z Yes ❑No Water Appearance(color and odor)At Start of Development: Water Appearance(color and odor)At End of Development: GJr\2:r ; IUon1C (L7)4A fNc,+F WELL CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT REMARKS LOLAr?m4 11e1\14x1e 4 to 1nf , Njf tH 5:3V Florida Department of Environmental Protection-Division of Waste Management-Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems WELL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT LOG WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA Well Nyinbar: Site N e: FDEP Facility I.D.Number: Wel Install Date(s): NI,Id- 7. PA:31171b(. Li I/Z-5/Lot'S Well Location and Type(check appropriate boas): Well Purpose: 0 peed Mentoring Well Install Method: Ri On-Site 0 Right-of-Way ©Shallow(Water-Table)MoNtonng nQ 0 Off-Ste Private Property 0 Intermediate or Deep bleMtnring 0 Above Grade 0 Rush-to-Grade 0 Remegation or Other(desoibe) Surface Casing Install Method: If.\G,lift kt ofrisershow Imd sirGce: Borehole Depth Well Depth Borehole Diameter Manhole Diameter Well Pad Size: (feet): i S (feet): 1% (inches):3,2 t (inches): j) t feet by I feet Riser Diameter and Material: RisclScreen 0Flush-TMeaded Riser Length: S fat I t S 3400\ PVL Connections: ❑other(dpernbe) . from _t_ keno _Simi Screen Diameter and Martha!: Screen Slot Size: Screen Length: $ ,fat 1 .5 :I AJ(t4 PREPP -t D,L3)3 3rvti4 from S feet to1feet 1°Surface Casing Material: In Surface Casing L.D.(inches): 1°Surface Casing Length: _fee also check 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to _feet 2n4 Surface Casing Material: 2e°Surface Casing I.D.(inches): ?°t Surface Casing Length: _fat also check: 0 Permanent ❑Temporary from 0 feet to _fat 3i°Surface Casing Material: 3'°Surface Casing LD.(inches): 3'e Surface Casing Length: _fat also check: 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to _fen Filter Pack Material and Size: Prepacked Filter Around Screen(check one): Filter Pack Length: 10 feet 7Q/30 SMP/I) ©Yes ONo from F feet to IS feet Filter Pack Seal Material mid Filter Pack Seal Length: -1 feet Size: J'-y&SS Sp NQ from I feet to J feet Surface Seal Material: Surface Seal Length: 'feet (aaq«rs / $ )tIU,Af'IO Lff Memo from r› feet to ) feet WELL DEVELOPMENT DATA Well Developmenr Date: Well Development Method(check one): U Smge/Fump VI Pimp 0 Compressed Al I /13 L2s. 0Oher(describe) Development p Type(check): ®Cetrifugal 0 Peristaltic Depth to Groundwater(before developing m feet): 0 Submersible 0 Ciller(describe) .'rat Li Pumping Rate(gallons per minute): Maximum Drawdown of Groundwater During Well Purged Dry(check one): C. LAu xaS Development(feet): c..)/ 7' 0 r ENo Pumpingdndition(check one): Total Development Water Development Duration DrummedDevelopment Water Drummed ©Camnums O lnhrnitte, Removed(gallons): (minutes): `4 (check one): Ryes 0 No Water Appearance(color and odor)At Start of Development Water Appearance(color and odor)At End of Development: Whv-„c. / N&-pa (-LFArt_ /4ld4r, WELL CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT REMARKS L €A-ii N: PPii',w4 1,:-.1 , Soo-n-3/4 Florida Department of Environmental Protecnon-Division of Waste Management-Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems WELL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT LOG --- - . . .— . •.: ' . ..... .. AYET-tcoNsTRKTIO.NRATA : : .:. :: . .: :: :.:.:- . :::. . ... .... . . Well Number: Site Name: , IFDEP Facility LE).Number. Well Install Date(s): 3 21 S:fg.0 C) Yti 41/411/AC;1 ECArfin Lir 1/7 )2.°6 Well Lemma and Type(check appropriate boxes). Well Purpose: 0 Perched Mondortng Well Install Method: E On-Site 0 Right-of'WeY g Shallow Mater-Table)Monitoring ( i,-r o off-ste Private Properly 0 Intempedlate or Deep Monitonng D Above Grade 0 flush-to-Grade 0 Remediation or Other(desaMe) Surface Casing Install Method: WAG,Mt feet of it show band=face: Borehole Depth Well Depth Borehole Diameter Manhole Diameter Well Pad Size: (feet): I S (feet)* (C (inchea):211/S (inches): 5 ./ feet by 1 feet Riser Diameter and Material. RiSeriSaten 0 Fluat-Threaded Riser Length: C) feet I'S- laiilb Ptir cfluens, El Other(descrIte) from CI feet to C.,. feet Screen Diameter and Mataial: Screen Slot Size: Screen Length: I rb feet I -t 2 ril,51 ek01\,i.1.-- . Emil 'c feet to 1< feet In Surface Casing Macomb I"Surface Casing LD.(inches): I"Surface Casing Length: feet also check: 0 Permanent 0 TeMPOratY from 0 feet to feet — 2"d Surface Casing Material: 2'1 Surface Casing ID.(inches): 214 Surface Casing Length: feet also check 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to feet — 3s Surface Casing Material: 3s Surface Casing LD.(inches): 3' Surface Casing Length: feet also cheek: 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to feet — Filter Pack Material and Size: ?repacked Filter Around Screen(cheek one): Filter Pack Length: IC- feet _ E Vim 0 NO from < feet to i < feet Filter Pack Seal Material and Filter Pack Seal Length: 1-4 feet Slit. id II P- 27/Inc from _ (alto eet -Surface Seal Material: Surface Seal Length: feet (jt -rt /P0.7 CNN le (..(1thrinn from , i) feet to k feet 7"7 7:. :. .. :.... ... ...... :. - :.:-In,LL pEVELOP.NIENT.DATA- . :• - .... .::. :.. . :'. • '. .'•• • -• Well Development Date. Well Development Method(cheek one): . Surge/l'utr Wong; U COrripressed Ar D Other(describe) Development Pump Type(check): 0 CenMfugal 0 perisgemn Depth to Groundwater(before developing in feet): 0 Submersible 0 Other(desalt*) -4 9 PumPing1 le(gallons Pa minute): Maximum Dray/down of Groundwater During Well Purged Dry(check one): 0 . c.FAt-var45 Development(feet): rii t)I Dves 'ONO pumping Condition(check one): Total Development Water Development Duration Development Water Drummed al Continuous 0 Intermittent Rtmoted(Pilo* (3 (minutes): 7._ (check one): Eves 0 Pio Water Appeenince(color and odor)At Stan of Development Water Appearance(color and odor)At End of Development: W Pill C /Pi 00 I,: LE,A< /t0.5 -.:.. . . .... : :WILT,CONSTRUCTION ORDEVELOPMENT:.RENIARICS ... .••• - •. : .:: • Lv)(A i lo,N, 2,1C1 Si kitivr Covniv‘...iiss)11 (64)ia kl t VIE Si 3a V, .._ — Florida Department of Environmental Protection-Division of Waste Management-Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems WELL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT LOG ;WELL COIV3TIt13CTIONAATA r Well Number Site Name: — FDEFacility I.D.Number Well Install Date(s): AIkJ- LI _?) ''4;acf--, 7,in/0c/ton 7//mg° Cn, 1/71/x. < web Location and Type(cheek a Ppww'i+¢boxes): Well Purpose: 0Perched Monitoring Well Install Methal: Ot on-site D Right-of-Way R Shallow(Water-Table)Monitonng ,Op D ort-site Prtwate Pipped,'• 0 Intermediate or Deep Mon mdng D Above Grade ❑Rush-t Grade 0 Remedlaban or Other(describe) Surface Casing Install Method: IAG,_is..-._f....-_.._o =face:e.�_.....-....-._.. If AG,list feet o(cisa above trod ambo: Borehole Depth Well Depth Borehole Diameter Manhole Diameter Well Pad Size: (feet): I C (feat): t { (Mac* 3-Z3 (inches): 5ct" t feet by L feet Riser Diameter and Material: RiseriScreen 0 Flush-Threaded Riser Length: ¶_feet 1N M f\ (y (` c''''oos: D mib (dee) from 0 feet to S feet Screen Diameter and Material: Screen Slot Size: Screen Length: 1• feet I' C ZNC4' Pr Lek g3 from feetto 1 C fat la Surface Casing Material: I"Surface Casing Lb.(inches): 1"Surface Casing Length: _feel also check: 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to _feet 2"°Surface Casing Material: 2°1 Surface Casing LD.(inches): 2°t Surface Casing Length: _fen also ask: 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 fan to feet 3S Surface Casing Material: 3i°Surface Casing ID.(inches): 3'a Surface Casing Length: _fat also check: 0 Permanent 0 Temporary from 0 feet to _fest Filter Pack Material and Size: Prepacked Filter Around Screen(check one): Filter Pack Length: to feet 70 /3'i 5111/24/10 EYes ONo from S fen to IS fat Filter Pack Sal Material and Filter Pack Seal Length: 4 fen Sac IV.% .c.0\4 t from I fen bet S feet I. Surface Seal Material: Surface Sal Length: t fat UMu, f Po L,cAve �E rave-; from t feet to N feet 1 F W.1 DEYELUY;NIENT DATA Well Development Date: 7 Well Development Method(checle one): Surge/Pump S Pump D compressed Air '/z]1ZatC. DOther(desaibe) Developtdan Pump Type(check): E Centrifugal 0 Peistaltic Depth to Groundwater(beforedeveloping in feet): O Submersible D Other(desaibe) 'r' ) t. Pumping�Rate(gallons per minute): Maximum Drawdown of Groundwater During Well Purged Dry(check one): S Development(feet): / V ❑yes ®No Pumping Condition(check one): Total Development Water Development Duration Development Water Dn®ed ®.CAnikttpus 0 Intermittent Ra wed(pilots): 10 (minutes): 7_0 (amok one): m yes 0 No Water Appearance(color and odor)At Sta 4 Development: Water Appearance(color and odor)At End of Development: 4 _14 _1 Wt11-1i/,Jnr Gt,tAR. /Nor4G WE:L:CONSTRUCTIONOaDEflLOPMENT:REMARKS . ..... In(I1-ixvl-vS '12..E("I CoMr✓)UN'LiY tier Mr) " \ EKY 51Cei Exhibit C Sample Agreement • it 7 Updated 12-19-2017 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND [FILL IN CONSULTANT NAME] FOR [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1, PURSUANT TO [FILL IN RFP, RFQ, OR ITB#] This Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) is entered into this XXXXXX day of XXXXXXXXXXXX, 20 , between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139 (the City), and [FILL IN CONSULTANT NAME], a [FILL IN TYPE OF ENTITY/I.E. CORPORATION, LLC, ETC.], whose address is XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(Consultant). SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS Agreement: This Agreement between the City and Consultant, including any exhibits and amendments thereto. City Manager: The chief administrative officer of the City. City Manager's Designee: The City staff member who is designated by the City Manager to administer this Agreement on behalf of the City. The City Manager's designee shall be the Department Director. Consultant: For the purposes of this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to be an independent contractor, and not an agent or employee of the City. Services: All services, work and actions by the Consultant performed or undertaken pursuant to the Agreement. Fee: Amount paid to the Consultant as compensation for Services. Proposal Documents: Proposal Documents shall mean City of Miami Beach [FILL IN RFP, RFQ, OR ITB] No. [XXXXXXXXXXXXXX] for [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1, together with all amendments thereto, issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement [FILL IN CORRECT ABBREVIATION RFP, RFQ, OR ITB], and the Consultants proposal in response thereto (Proposal), all of which are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the following order of precedent shall prevail: this Agreement; the [FILL IN RFP, RFQ, or ITB]; and the Proposal. 1 Updated 12-19-2017 Risk Manager: The Risk Manager of the City, with offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Third Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139; telephone number (305) 673-7000, Ext. 6435; and fax number(305)673-7023. SECTION 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 In consideration of the Fee to be paid to Consultant by the City, Consultant shall provide the work and services described in Exhibit"A" hereto(the Services). [NOTE: EXHIBIT"A" MUST INCLUDE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES] Although Consultant may be provided with a schedule of the available hours to provide its services, the City shall not control nor have the right to control the hours of the services performed by the Consultant; where the services are performed (although the City will provide Consultant with the appropriate location to perform the services); when the services are performed, including how many days a week the services are performed; how the services are performed, or any other aspect of the actual manner and means of accomplishing the services provided. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all services provided by the Consultant shall be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager. If there are any questions regarding the services to be performed, Consultant should contact the following person: 2.2 Consultant's Services, and any deliverables incident thereto, shall be completed in accordance with the timeline and/or schedule in Exhibit [XXX] hereto. [NOTE: TIMELINE FOR DELIVERABLES CAN ALSO BE INCLUDED IN EXHIBIT "A" OR IN SEPARATE EXHIBIT] SECTION 3 TERM The term of this Agreement (Term) shall commence upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, and shall have an initial term of [XXXXXXXXXXXX], with [XXXXXXXXXXI renewal options, to be exercised at the City Manager's sole option and discretion, by providing Consultant with written notice of same no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the initial term. Notwithstanding the Term provided herein, Consultant shall adhere to any specific timelines, schedules, dates, and/or performance milestones for completion and delivery of the Services, as same is/are set forth in the timeline and/or schedule referenced in Exhibit [XXX] hereto. 2 Updated 12-19-2017 SECTION 4 FEE 4.1 In consideration of the Services to be provided, Consultant shall be compensated on a fixed fee basis, in the amount of$XXXXXXXX. 4.2 [NOTE: INCLUDE AMOUNT FOR REIMBURSABLES, IF ANY]. 4.3 [NOTE: INCLUDE HOW FEE IS TO BE PAID — I.E. "X" PERCENTAGE UP FRONT; "X" UPON DELIVERY; MONTHLY; LUMP SUM; ETC.]. 4.4 INVOICING Upon receipt of an acceptable and approved invoice, payment(s) shall be made within forty-five (45) days for that portion (or those portions) of the Services satisfactorily rendered (and referenced in the particular invoice). Invoices shall include a detailed description of the Services (or portions thereof) provided, and shall be submitted to the City at the following address: SECTION 5 TERMINATION 5.1 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE If the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner, or otherwise violates, any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations material to this Agreement, the City, through its City Manager, shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement for cause. Prior to exercising its option to terminate for cause, the City shall notify the Consultant of its violation of the particular term(s) of this Agreement, and shall grant Consultant ten (10) days to cure such default. If such default remains uncured after ten (10) days, the City may terminate this Agreement without further notice to Consultant. Upon termination, the City shall be fully discharged from any and all liabilities, duties, and terms arising out of, or by virtue of, this Agreement. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by any breach of the Agreement by the Consultant. The City, at its sole option and discretion, shall be entitled to bring any and all legal/equitable actions that it deems to be in its best interest in order to enforce the City's right and remedies against 3 Updated 12-19-2017 Consultant. The City shall be entitled to recover all costs of such actions, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 5.2 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY THE CITY MAY ALSO, THROUGH ITS CITY MANAGER, AND FOR ITS CONVENIENCE AND WITHOUT CAUSE, TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT AT ANY TIME DURING THE TERM BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE TO CONSULTANT OF SUCH TERMINATION; WHICH SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING RECEIPT BY THE CONSULTANT OF SUCH NOTICE. ADDITIONALLY, IN THE EVENT OF A PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR SAFETY CONCERN, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY MANAGER, IN THE CITY MANAGER'S SOLE DISCRETION, THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO A VERBAL OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CONTRACTOR, MAY IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT FOR A TIME CERTAIN, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT ON A GIVEN DATE. IF THE AGREEMENT IS TERMINATED FOR CONVENIENCE BY THE CITY, CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID FOR ANY SERVICES SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION; FOLLOWING WHICH THE CITY SHALL BE DISCHARGED FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, DUTIES, AND TERMS ARISING OUT OF, OR BY VIRTUE OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 5.3 TERMINATION FOR INSOLVENCY The City also reserves the right to terminate the Agreement in the event the Consultant is placed either in voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. In such event, the right and obligations for the parties shall be the same as provided for in Section 5.2. SECTION 6 INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Miami Beach and its officers, employees, agents, and contractors, from and against any and all actions (whether at law or in equity), claims, liabilities, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and costs, for personal, economic or bodily injury, wrongful death, loss of or damage to property, which may arise or be alleged to have arisen from the negligent acts, errors, omissions or other wrongful conduct of the Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or any other person or entity acting under Consultant's control or supervision, in connection with, related to, or as a result of the Consultant's performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement. To that extent, the Consultant shall pay all such claims and losses and shall pay all such costs and judgments which may issue from any lawsuit arising from such claims and losses, and shall pay all costs and attorneys' fees expended by the City in the defense of such claims and losses, including appeals. The Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the Consultant shall in no way limit the Consultant's responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. 4 Updated 12-19-2017 The parties agree that one percent (1%) of the total compensation to Consultant for performance of the Services under this Agreement is the specific consideration from the City to the Consultant for the Consultant's indemnity agreement. The provisions of this Section 6.1 and of this indemnification shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. 6.2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS [NOTE: INSURANCE TYPES AND LIMITS BELOW SHOULD ALWAYS BE SAME AS WHAT WAS SPECIFICED IN BID DOCUMENTS] The Consultant shall maintain and carry in full force during the Term, the following insurance: 1. Consultant General Liability, in the amount of$1,000,000; 2. Consultant Professional Liability, in the amount of$200,000; and 3. Workers Compensation & Employers Liability, as required pursuant to Florida Statutes. The insurance must be furnished by insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida. All insurance policies must be issued by companies rated no less than "B+" as to management and not less than "Class VI" as to strength by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey, or its equivalent. All of Consultant's certificates shall contain endorsements providing that written notice shall be given to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction in coverage in the policy. The insurance certificates for General Liability shall include the City as an additional insured and shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement. Original certificates of insurance must be submitted to the City's Risk Manager for approval (prior to any work and/or services commencing) and will be kept on file in the Office of the Risk Manager. The City shall have the right to obtain from the Consultant specimen copies of the insurance policies in the event that submitted certificates of insurance are inadequate to ascertain compliance with required coverage. The Consultant is also solely responsible for obtaining and submitting all insurance certificates for any sub-consultants. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the Consultant of the liabilities and obligations under this Section or under any other portion of this Agreement. The Consultant shall not commence any work and or services pursuant to this Agreement until all insurance required under this Section has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City's Risk Manager. SECTION 7 LITIGATION JURISDICTIONNENUE/JURY TRIAL WAIVER This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. This Agreement shall be enforceable in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and if legal action is necessary by either party with respect to the enforcement of any or all of the terms or conditions herein, exclusive venue for the enforcement of same shall lie in Miami-Dade County, Florida. By 5 Updated 12-19-2017 entering into this Agreement, Consultant and the City expressly waive any rights either party may have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement. SECTION 8 LIMITATION OF CITY'S LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on the City's liability for any cause of action, for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the sum of $10,000. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damage action for breach of contract to be limited to a maximum amount of$10,000. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to the Consultant for damages in an amount in excess of $10,000 for any action or claim for breach of contract arising out of the performance or non-performance of any obligations imposed upon the City by this Agreement. Nothing contained in this section or elsewhere in this Agreement is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon the City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. SECTION 9 DUTY OF CARE/COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS/PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT' AND CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS 9.1 DUTY OF CARE With respect to the performance of the work and/or service contemplated herein, Consultant shall exercise that degree of skill, care, efficiency and diligence normally exercised by reasonable persons and/or recognized professionals with respect to the performance of comparable work and/or services. 9.2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS In its performance of the work and/or services, Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations of the City, Miami-Dade County, the State of Florida, and the federal government, as applicable. 9.3 PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS Any work product arising out of this Agreement, as well as all information specifications, processes, data and findings, are intended to be the property of the City and shall not otherwise be made public and/or disseminated by Consultant, without the prior written consent of the City Manager, excepting any information, records etc. which are required to be disclosed pursuant to 6 Updated 12-19-2017 Court Order and/or Florida Public Records Law. All reports, documents, articles, devices, and/or work produced in whole or in part under this Agreement are intended to be the sole and exclusive property of the City, and shall not be subject to any application for copyright or patent by or on behalf of the Consultant or its employees or sub-consultants, without the prior written consent of the City Manager. SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 AUDIT AND INSPECTIONS Upon reasonable verbal or written notice to Consultant, and at any time during normal business hours (i.e. 9AM — 5PM, Monday through Fridays, excluding nationally recognized holidays), and as often as the City Manager may, in his/her reasonable discretion and judgment, deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City Manager, and/or such representatives as the City Manager may deem to act on the City's behalf, to audit, examine, and/ or inspect, any and all other documents and/or records relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all such records at its place of business at the address set forth in the "Notices" section of this Agreement. 10.2 [INTENTIONALLY DELETETD] 10.3 ASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER OR SUBCONSULTING Consultant shall not subcontract, assign, or transfer all or any portion of any work and/or service under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Manager, which consent, if given at all, shall be in the Manager's sole judgment and discretion. Neither this Agreement, nor any term or provision hereof, or right hereunder, shall be assignable unless as approved pursuant to this Section, and any attempt to make such assignment (unless 'approved) shall be void. 10.4 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES Prior to commencement of the Services, the Consultant shall file a State of Florida Form PUR 7068, Sworn Statement under Section 287.133(3)(a) Florida Statute on Public Entity Crimes with the City's Procurement Division. 10.5 NO DISCRIMINATION In connection with the performance of the Services, the Consultant shall not exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status. Additionally, Consultant shall comply fully with the City of Miami Beach Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, as may be amended from time to time, prohibiting discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and public 7 Updated 12-19-2017 services on account of actual or perceived race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, age, disability, ancestry, height, weight, domestic partner status, labor organization membership, familial situation, or political affiliation. 10.6 CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant herein agrees to adhere to and be governed by all applicable Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest Ordinances and Ethics provisions, as set forth in the Miami-Dade County Code, as may be amended from time to time; and by the City of Miami Beach Charter and Code, as may be amended from time to time; both of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which could conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not employ any person having any such interest. No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this Agreement or to any benefits arising therefrom. 10.7 CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW (A) Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time. (B) The term "public records" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011(12), which means all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. (C) Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes, if the Consultant meets the definition of"Contractor as defined in Section 119.0701(1)(a), the Consultant shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (2) Upon request from the City's custodian of public records, provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed, except as authorized by law, for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (4) Upon completion of the Agreement, transfer, at no cost to the City, all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service. If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored 8 Updated 12-19-2017 electronically must be provided to the City, upon request from the City's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. (D) REQUEST FOR RECORDS; NONCOMPLIANCE. (1) A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City. If the City does not possess the requested records, the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request, and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time. (2) Consultants failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement, and the City, at its sole discretion, may: (1) unilaterally terminate the Agreement; (2) avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement; and/or(3)avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. (3) A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s. 119.10. (E) CIVIL ACTION. (1) If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records relating to the City's contract for services, the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees, if: a. The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time; and b. At least 8 business days before filing the action, the plaintiff provided written notice of the public records request, including a statement that the Consultant has not complied with the request, to the City and to the Consultant. (2) A notice complies with subparagraph (1)(b) if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent. Such notices must be sent by common carrier delivery service or by registered, Global Express Guaranteed, or certified mail, with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery, which may be in an electronic format. (3) A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. (F) IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION: RAFAEL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 9 Updated 12-19-2017 E-MAIL: RAFAELGRANADO(a�MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE: 305-673-7411 SECTION 11 NOTICES All notices and communications in writing required or permitted hereunder, shall be delivered personally to the representatives of the Consultant and the City listed below or may be mailed by U.S. Certified Mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service. Until changed by notice, in writing, all such notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: TO CONSULTANT: [FILL IN] TO CITY: [FILL IN] Notice may also be provided to any other address designated by the party to receive notice if such alternate address is provided via U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivered, or by overnight delivery. In the event an alternate notice address is properly provided, notice shall be sent to such alternate address in addition to any other address which notice would otherwise be sent, unless other delivery instruction as specifically provided for by the party entitled to notice. Notice shall be deemed given on the date of an acknowledged receipt, or, in all other cases, on the date of receipt or refusal. SECTION 12 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 12.1 CHANGES AND ADDITIONS This Agreement cannot be modified or amended without the express written consent of the parties. No modification, amendment, or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 12.2 SEVERABILITY If any term or provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 10 Updated 12-19-2017 12.3 ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT The City and Consultant agree that this is the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Title and paragraph headings are for convenient reference and are not intended to confer any rights or obligations upon the parties to this Agreement. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 11 Updated 12-19-2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first entered above. FOR CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA ATTEST: By: City Clerk City Manager Date: FOR CONSULTANT: [INSERT NAME] ATTEST: By: Print Name and Title Print Name and Title Date: R: ATTOiTORGiAgreements/Professional Services Agreement 2017 modified 12-19-2017 12 MIAMI BEACH Procurement Department, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3' Floor, Miami Beech, Florida 33139, www.miamibeacllfl.gov, 305-673-7490 ADDENDUM NO. 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION (RFQ) 2018-027-WG GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER FOR THE MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER February 1, 2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. I. DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 P.M.,on Friday, February 9, 2018, at the following location. City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL BE RELEASED WITH RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadonmiamibeachfl.qov. . - Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: William Garviso 305-673-7000, ext. 6650 WilliamGarviso@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Sincerely, l�lit/`pa•' A x Denis Procurement Director 1 ADDENDUM NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)NO.2018-027-WG GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER FOR THE MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach,1755 Meridian Avenue,3id Floor, Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.8ov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:305-873-7490. ADDENDUM NO. 2 RFC)2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center January 23,2016 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. I. REVISIONS RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of proposals is extended until 3:00 P.M., on • Friday, February 2, 2018, at the following location. City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at • RafaelG ranado@ m is m ibeachfl.qov, Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: William Garviso 305-673-7000, ext. 6650 WilliamGarviso@mianiibeachfl.gov I Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Sincer-ly, Alex Denis Procurement Director 1 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach,1755 Meridian Avenue,3s Floor, Miami Beech,Florida 33139,www.miamibeach0.0ov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:305-673-7490. ADDENDUM NO. 1 RFC/2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center December 15, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. I. REVISIONS The Pre-proposal meeting has been postponed to January 5, 2018 @ 10:00AM, at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department—3rd Floor Conference Room C 1755 Meridian Avenue Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone)is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1)Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2)Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@m iamibeach0.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: William Garviso 305-673-7000, ext. 6650 WilliamGarviso@miamibeachFl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Sincerely, Alex Denis Procurement Director 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ ) GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER FOR THE MIAMI BEACH CONVENTION CENTER 2018-027-WG RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: JANUARY 24, 2018 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: CA MIAMIBEACH William Garviso, Procurement Contracting Officer II PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7000 x 6650 I www.miamibeachfl.gov m /...I. rA BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS &SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 31 APPENDIX F STANDARD FORM 330 33 RFO 2018-027-WG 2 m ,N.AIAPA BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida (the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the 'proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently,the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to qualify a Proposer to initiate a Site Assessment Report that builds on the existing environmental site assessments previously conducted for the Miami Beach Convention Center Renovation Project, and that assesses and delineates contamination in the soil and groundwater beyond the limits of development. This Site Assessment Report must be initiated prior to the completing site development activities. The successful bidder shall also prepare a remediation and/or monitoring plan for the property, oversee the implementation of the remediation and/or monitoring plans,and other related task as needed to obtain a determination of compliance with all applicable regulatory agencies. The Consultant shall provide, Environmental Engineering, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal Permitting, Department of Environmental Resource Management Permitting, construction costs estimating and geotechnical services for the Project. The work shall include, but not be limited to, geotechnical, environmental assessment, estimates of probable remediation cost at each stage of development (including 100%), presentation materials to include renderings for regulatory agency(s) review, remediation documents, permitting, bidding /award, and construction administration services for the Project. Construction Documents shall include all necessary drawings and technical specifications needed to conduct the environmental assessment and shall be defining documentation of what is authorized and approved. The successful firm will have the financial resources and technical expertise to conduct environmental site assessments that will delineate contamination in soil and groundwater, and remediation administration services for these improvements. This RFQ is issued pursuant to Chapter 287.055, Florida Statutes,the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act(CCNA). 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued December 14, 2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting December 20, 2017 @1:30PM Deadline for Receipt of Questions January 15, 2018 @ 5:00PM RFQ 2018-027-WG 3 m . •.lA1.JBEACH Responses Due January 24, 2018 @ 3:00PM Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact' Telephone: Email'. William Garviso,CPPB 305 673-7000#6650 william.arviso. miamibeachfl..ov additionally, the Cay Clerk is t. .• •.i•. on -II .mm ni ti.n vi. •-m.il • RafaelGranado amiamibeachfl..ov; or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department-3rd Floor 1755 Meridian Avenue Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be RFQ 2018-027-WG 4 m `vAILv1'',A BEACH received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2485.3 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2.481 THROUGH 2-406 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list, 10.COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, the Proposer shall adopt a Code of RFQ 2018-027-WG 5 BEACH Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters(five (5)days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17. JOINT VENTURES: Joint Ventures are not allowed. The City will contract with a Prime Contractor only. Each proposal shall be submitted by the Prime Contractor only. However, proposals may include sub-contractors or sub- consultants to the Prime Contractor. 18. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an REO or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2) Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal RFQ 2018-027-WG 6 m ,'.A / f. BEACH or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Rejection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120) calendar days after proposal opening date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23.COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation Much proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. RFQ 2018-027-WG 7 m A.:l l\ ^ A BEACH 26.TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposers risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, andlor agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. RFQ 2018-027-WG 8 Q AAiIAt. ; BEACH 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organizationTM, as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F. The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation;then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation, with the latest Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. RFC) 2018-027-WG 9 m 1.Al j "IBEACH 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this-chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. RFQ 2018-027-WG 10 n%,,IAt,,y BEACH 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS. A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When - additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s)that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases, the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract, to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2018-027-WG 11 m " BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Standard Form 330. The proposing firm shall submit a completed Standard From 330 (attached). No proposal will be considered without this required form. In addition to experience and qualifications considerations, the City may use this information to consider the firm's previous and current workload. 2.2 Qualifications of Prime Proposer (Firm). Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services as identified in this solicitation, including experience in completing construction documents for environmental assessments/remediation on projects of 3 acres or more with comparable amenities and features where arsenic contamination have been found. 2.3 Qualifications of Prime Proposer's Team (Geologists and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded, the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. Approach and Methodology 3.1 Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the required scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: the assessment process, bid and award process services, construction administration and or any additional services RFQ 2018-027-WG 12 ?� [ ',,..I,41yA BEACH that may be offered the proposer. 3.2 Also, provide information on Proposer's current workload and how the potential project(s) will fit into Proposer's workload. Describe available laboratories, technological capabilities and other available resources you offer for the potential project(s). Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2018-027-WG 13 Mv..IAl^A, BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received, with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1-Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Experience and Qualifications 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement Management to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The Volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City within the last three(3)years from the due date of the proposal. See Section 5 4.0 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 4. Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three (3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than $250,000 5 $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than $2,000,000 0 RFC/ 2018-027—WG 14 m ;.AIA�,^,i BEACH 5. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B c Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 ' Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFG 2018-027-WG 15 APPENDIX A M AM BEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3fd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018-027-WG 16 Solicitation No Solicitation Title RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for The Miami Beach Convention Center Procurement Contact. Tel Email: William Garviso, CPPB 305 673-7000#6650 WilliamGarviso@miamibeachfi.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1, General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME'. No of Years in Business: No of Years In Business Locally. No of Employees OTHER NAMES)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS). CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NOr. TOLL FREE NO FAX NO. FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS. CITY STATE ZIP CODE. PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO. ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO'. The City reserves the right to seek additional informafion from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information,applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2018-027—WG 17 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance. Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name 8 Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contacts Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Cade")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachifigov/procurementi. RFQ 2018-027—WG 18 7. remr^ercieg itP City fiscal y ar 2012 13(^stob^ 1,2012),the hourly tivirg rata win he e1-1.28" '"aheaRh ger au of Labor Statistics. "'^Hwprstaarti - a'irdrx shall exceed Wee per crt(3°y.The City may also,by mar). Proposers'failwo to cemplyawMihic pro.isior-€ ,4-b^d^emod a•^^te^aFbroach underth;s-eFeee-al-order•vhi.• • Ay-Rey 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida,and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the"other'section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control. (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2018-027-WG 19 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287,133(2)(a),Florida Statutes, as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, proposals. or replies on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation, marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Financial Capacity. At the request of the City, proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SOS)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein.The cost of the preparation of the SCR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SOS report from D&8 at https:llsupplierportal.dn b.comlwebapplwcslstoreslservlet/Su pplierPortal?storeld=11696 13. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016,the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 14. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2018-027—WG 20 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award.shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications, and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content,its accuracy.or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation.the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions, or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solidtation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason, or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2018-027—WG 21 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is pal of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws', all responses, data and information contained in this proposal. inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative. Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative. Date: State of J On this day of 20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed, Before me: Notary Public for the State of My Commission Expires: RR) 2018-027—WG 22 APPENDIX B m M AM1 BEACH " No Bid " Form 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid: The "Statement of No Bid" provides the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City. RFQ 2018-027-WG 23 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal _Insufficient time to respond _ Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: William Garviso, CPPB STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2018-027-WG 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3'd Floor MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFC) 2018-027-WG 24 APPENDIX C m MIAMI BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFa 2018-027-WG 25 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit detailed verifiable information affirmatively documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposals that fail to comply with minimum requirements will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. Determination of compliance with the minimum eligibility requirements is strictly at the sole discretion of the City of Miami Beach. PRIME PROPOSER: 1. The Prime Proposer (Engineering Firm) shall hold a Certificate of Authorization by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. Background. In December 2014, the City conducted a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment as pal of the Miami Beach Convention Center Renovation Project. The results documented in Phase II report indicated that a large portion of the project site formerly operated as a golf course and that arsenic levels in the soil exceeded residential cleanup target levels. Groundwater sampling results indicated that two out of three wells are contaminated with Nitrates, while one well is contaminated with Arsenic and Antimony. While arsenic in the soil was the only contaminant of concern reported above the regulatory limit, the Environmental Site Assessment also included sampling for lead, organochlorine pesticides, and organophosphate pesticides. Miami Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources(RER) also requires testing for ammonia, nitrites, nitrates, the 8 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Volatile Organic Hydrocarbons (VOH) and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) to be sampled to obtain site closure. C2. Statement of Work Required. The City's Environment and Sustainability Department is seeking to hire a Consultant to initiate a Site Assessment Report that builds on the existing environmental site assessments previously conducted for the Miami Beach Convention Center Renovation Project, and that assesses and delineates contamination in the soil and groundwater beyond the limits of development. This Site Assessment Report must be initiated prior to the completing site development activities. The successful bidder shall also prepare a remediation and for monitoring plan for the property, oversee the implementation of the remediation and/or monitoring plans, and other related task as needed to obtain a determination of"No Further Action." The Consultant shall provide, Environmental Engineering, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Coastal Permitting, Department of Environmental Resource Management Permitting, construction costs estimating and geotechnical services for the Project. The work shall include, but not be limited to, geotechnical, environmental assessment with deliverables at 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% development stages, estimates of probable remediation cost at each stage of development (including 100%), presentation materials to include renderings for regulatory agency(s) review, remediation documents, permitting, bidding I award, and construction administration services for the Project. Construction Documents shall include all necessary drawings and technical specifications needed to conduct the environmental assessment and shall be defining documentation of what is authorized and approved. Proposer shall: • Prepare utility coordination, permits and advise of all fees associated with all site, utility etc. work. RFQ 2018-027-WG 26 • Coordinate with the environmental assessment plan and activities. • Conduct Phase I and Phase II environmental assessments. • Organize and execute environmental sampling and analytical testing. • Deliver an environmental assessment of the property for the City to reach regulatory closure for the property. • Utilize Risk-Based Corrective Action approaches to obtain No Further Action with Conditions (NFAC;conditional closure). • Obtain approvals for Site Assessment Reports (SARs) and Remedial or Corrective Action Plans (CAPsIRAPs)from RER. • Assessing public access/use areas. • Performing other related environmental work, not identified above, necessary for investigation and/or potential or known contamination, for compliance with applicable regulations, for protection of the environment and public health and for cleanup of environmental contamination. • Prepare presentation materials to illustrate the site assessment and participate in regulatory agency review meetings. • Obtain all required permits from regulatory agencies as necessary for the assessment of the property and attend public meetings as required by the City. The Consultant shall be required to provide accurate scope of work document and cost estimates for approved phases. Task One(1)—Assessment Services: The Consultant will be required to prepare assessment and permit documents for the evaluation of the property as described in each phase, as to be bid and awarded. The selected firm shall be required to perform a variety of forensic tasks to verify existing site and environmental condition and the accuracy of any available as-built drawings, surveys and maps to be used for development of the contract drawings. The subject property has been identified as containing environmental contaminants. As such, the City hopes to finalize an environmental assessment of the property so that a remediation plan can be established. The select firm will be required to build on the existing environmental site assessment completed in December 2014. The Consultant will be required to provide Statements of Probable Remediation Cost as defined by the American Association of Cost Engineers, and make recommendations on constructability and value engineering. The Consultant shall establish and maintain an in-house Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) program designed to verify and ensure the quality, clarity, completeness, and constructability of its contract documents. In addition, the selected firm shall follow City standards for the preparation of contract documents, inclusive of drawings, specifications, front-end documents and cost estimates. Contract documents shall be subject to Constructability and Value Engineering reviews by City and/or others. The selected firm will work with the City to revise/adjust project scope as may be deemed necessary to meet established budgets as project evolves through the remediation stages of completion. The selected firm will attend periodic meetings as needed during project development (provide, keep and distribute meeting minutes). To facilitate the implementation of a Public Information Program, the RFC/ 2018-027-WG 27 selected firm will provide electronic files of all project documents,as directed by the City. The selected firm shall be responsible for securing all required regulatory approvals of its contract documents from all applicable jurisdictional agencies and boards prior to finalization, and will be responsible for initiating submittals and reviews in a timely manner. Task Two (2)-Bid and Award Services: The selected firm shall assist the City in the bidding and award of the project. Such assistance shall include attending pre-bid conferences, assisting with the preparation of necessary contract addenda, attending bid openings where applicable, and assisting with bid evaluations. The selected firm shall provide "As-Bid" documents for use during the assessment. Task Three (3)-Construction Administration Services: The selected firm shall perform a variety of tasks associated with the administration of the environmental assessment contract and management of the project. These shall include attendance at the pre-construction conferences, attendance at weekly construction meetings (provide, keep and distribute meeting minutes), responding to contractor Requests for Information (RFI), clarification, responding to and evaluating contractor requests for change orders and/or contingency draws, contract amendments, review and approve of shop drawings, review and approve of record drawings, review and recommendation of contractor applications for payment, specialty site visits, project closeout reviews, including substantial completion, final punch list development and project certification of final completion and acceptance, and warranty administration. Task Four(4)-Additional Services: No additional services are envisioned at this time. However, if such services are required during the performance of the work, they will be requested by the City and negotiated in accordance with the Contract requirements. Task Five (5)-Reimbursable Services: The City may reimburse, at cost rate, pre-approved additional expenses, such as, but not limited to, reproduction costs,and permits cost(s). RFO 2018-027-WG 28 APPENDIX D _ MIAMI BEACH Special Conditions 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018-027-WG 29 1. TERM OF CONTRACT. This contract shall commence upon the date of final execution of an agreement and shall remain in effect until such time as the awarded firm delivers to the City an environmental assessment of the property for the City to reach regulatory closure for the property and receive final Miami Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources(RER)approval. 2. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Prior to submitting its offer, the vendor is encouraged to visit the site of the proposed work and to become familiar with any conditions which may in any manner affect the work to be done or affect the equipment, materials and labor required. The vendor is also required to examine carefully the drawings and specifications and be thoroughly aware regarding any and all conditions and requirements that may in any manner affect the work to be performed under the contract. No additional allowances will be made because of lack of knowledge of these conditions. 3. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source or restricted without prior written approval of the City. 4. PRECLUSION. Successful Proposer and sub-consultants contracted to provide the engineering services for a particular project are precluded from bidding/responding to the competitive solicitation for the remediation of the project. 5. CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER. A change in the Consultant's project manager(as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the City project manager). 6. SUB-CONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 7. NEGOTIATIONS. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services, deliverables and cost of services. RFQ 2018-027-WG 30 APPENDIX E m M AM1 BEACH Insurance Requirements 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018-027-WG 31 m► MIAMI BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements" of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. XXX 4. Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $2,000,000.000 with deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit of liability. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate, 6. Other Insurance as indicated: _Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ 00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 _Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title A waiver of subrogation in favor of the City must be included for the policies required above. The insurance coverage required shall include those classifications, as listed in standard liability insurance manuals, which most nearly reflect the operations of the vendor. The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2018-027-WG 32 APPENDIX F MIAMI BEACH Standard Form 330 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RR) 2018-027-WG 33 ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS OMB Control Number: 9000-0157 Expiration Date: 11/30/2017 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement-This information collection meets the requirements 0'44 USC§3507,as amended by section 2 of'Me Paperwork Reduc(Iwl Act of 1995. You do no;need to answer these questions unless we d'splay a valid Office of Managemert and Budget(OMB)control number. The OMB control number for this coAecuon is 9000-0157. We eetmate that it will take 29 hours(25 hours(or part I and 4 hours for Part 2)to read the Instructions,gather the racts,and answer the questions. Send only comments relating to our time estimate.including suggestions for reducing this burden,or any other aspects of this collectkn of Information to: General Services Administration,Regulatory Secretariat Division(MIVI08),1000 f Street,NW.Washington,DC 20405. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS Federal agencies use this form to obtain information from Architect-Engineer Services: Defined in FAR 2.101, architect-engineer(A-E)firms about their professional qualifications. Federal agencies select Flims for A-E contracts on Branch Office: A geographically distinct place of business or the basis of professional qualifications as required by 40 U.S.C. chapter 11,Selection cf Architects Engineers, and Part 36 of the subsidiary orrice of a firm that has a key role on the team, Federal Acquisition Regulation(FAR). Discipline: Primary technical capabilities of key personnel,as The Selection of Architects and Engineers statute requires the evidenced by academic degree, professional registration, public announcement of requirements for A-E services(with certification,and/or extensive experience. some exceptions provided by other statutes), and the selection of at least three of the most highly qualified firms based on Firm: Defined in FAR 36.102. demonstrateo competence and professional qualifications according to specific criteria published in the announcement. Key Personnel: Individuals who will have major contract The Act then requires the negotiation of a contract at a fair and responsibilities and/or provide unusual or unique expertise. reasonable price starting first with the most highly qualified firm. The information teed to evaluate firms is from this form and other SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS sources, including performance evaluations,any additional data requested by the agency,and interviews with the most highly Part I-Contract-Specific Qualifications • qualified firms and their references. Section A.Contract Information. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Title and Location. Enter the title and location of the contract for which this form is being submitted, exactly as shown Part I presents the qualifications for a specific contract, in the public announcement or agency request. Part II presents tie general qualifications of a firm cr a specific 2, Public Notice Date. Enter the posted date of the agency's • branch rase of firm. Part II has two uses', notice on the Federal Business Opportunity website (FedBizcpps), other form of public announcement or agency request for this contract 1. An A-E firm may submit Part II to the appropriate central, regional or local office of each Federal agency to be kept on file. 3. Solicitation or Project Number, Enter the agercy's A public announcement is not required for certain contracts,and solicitation number and/or project number, if applicable, agencies may use Part II as a basis for selecting at least three of exactly as shown in the public announcement or agency request the most highly qualified firms for discussions pr:'or to requesting for this contract. • submission of Part I. Firms are encouraged to update Part II on file with agency offices,as appropriate,according to FAR Part Section B. Architect-Engineer Point of Contact. j 36. If a firm has branch offices,submit a separate Part II for each branch office seeking work. 4-8. Name, Title, Name of Firm, Telephone Number, Fax .I (Facsimile) Number and E-mail (Electronic Mail) Address. 2. Prepare a separate Part II for each firm that will be part of Provide information for a representative of the prime contractor the team proposedjof_a specific contract.andsubmitted with.Bart - -- or joint-venture -that the-agency-can contact-for additional I. If a firm has branch offices,submit a separate Part II for each information. branch office that has a key role on the team. • INDIVIDUAL AGENCY INSTRUCTIONS Individual agencies may supplement these instructions. For example,they may limit the number of projects or number of pages submitted in Part I in response to a public announcement for a particular project. Carefully comply with any agency 1 instructions when preparing and submitting this form. Be as concise as possible and provide only the information requested by the agency, AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV. 8/2016)PAGE 1 OF INSTRUCTIONS • Prescribed by GSA-FAR(40 CFR)53.236-2(b) Section C. Proposed Team. 19. Relevant Projects. Provide information on up to five projects in which the person had a significant role that 9-11. Firm Name,Address, and Role in This Contract. demonstrates the person's capability relevant to hermis proposed Provide the contractual relationship, name.full mailing address, role in this contract. These projects do not necessarily have to and a brief description of the role of each firm that will be be any of the projects presented in Section F for the project team involved in performance of this contract. List the prime If the person was not involved in any of those projects or the contractor or joint venture partners first. If a firm has branch person worked on other projects that were more relevant than offices,indicate each individual branch office that will have a key the team projects in Section F. Use the check box provided to role on the team. The named subcontractors and outside irdicate if the project was performed with any office of the current associates or consultants must be used,and any change must firm, If any of the professional services or construction projects be approved by to contracting officer.(See FAR Part 52 Clause are not complete, leave Year Completed blank and Indicate the "Subcontractors and Outside Associates and Consultants status in Brief Description and Specific Role(block(3)). (Architect-Engineer Services)"). Attach an additional sheet in the Section F. Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposec same format as Section C if needed. Team's Qualifications for this Contract Section a Organizational Chart of Proposed Team. • Select projects where multiple team members worked As an attachment after Section C,present an organizational • together, if possible,that demonstrate the team's capability to chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all perform work similar to that required for this contract. Complete one Section F for each project. Present ten projects,unless key crated with as int Section E and the firm they are otherwise specified by the agency. Complete the following associated with as listed in Section C. blocks for each project: Section E. Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Contract. 20. Example Project Key Number. Stag with"1"for the first project and number consecutively. i Complete this section for each key person who will participate in this contract. Group by firm,with personnel of the 21. Title and Location. Title and location of projector prime contractor or joint venture partner firms first. The following contract. For an indefinite delivery contract,the location is the blocks must be completed for each resume' geographic scope of the contract. • 12. Name. Self-explanatory. 22. Year Completed. Enter the year completed of the professional services(such as planning, engineering study, 13. Role in this contract. Self-explanatory. design, or surveying),and/or the year completed of construction, if applicable. If any of the professional services or the construction projects are not complete, leave Year Completed 14. Years Experience. Total years of relevant experience blank and indicate the status in Brief Description of Project and (block 14a),and years of relevant experience witn current firm, Relevance to this Contract(block 24). but not necessarily the same branch office(block 14b). 23a. Project Owner. Project owner or user,such as a 15. Firm Name and Location. Name,city and state of the government agency or installation,an institution,a corporation or • firm where the person currently works,which must correspond private individual. • with one of:he firms(or branch office of a firm,if appropriate) i listed in Section C. 23b. Point of Contact Name. Provide name of a person associated with the project owner or the organization which 16. Education. Provide information on the highest relevant , contracted for the professional services,who is very familiar with academic degree(s)received. Indicate the area(s)of the project and the firm's(or firms')performance. specialization far each degree. • 23c. Point of Contact Telephone Number. Self-explanatory. 17. Current Professional Registration. Provide information on current relevant professional registration(s)in a State or 2q, Brief Description of Project and Relevance to this possessionColumbia c the United FAR Part Puerto Rico, or the District of Contract. Indicate scope,size,cost,principal elements and Columbia according to Part 36. special features of the project. Discuss the relevance of the example project to this contract. Enter any other information 18. Other Professional Qualifl Provide Information requested by the agency for each example pro,,ect on any other professional qualificationstions relating to this contract, such as education, professional registration,publications, organizational memberships,certifications,training, awards, and foreign language capabilities. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 2 OF INSTRUCTIONS 25, Firms from Section C Involved with this Project. Indicate 29. Example Projects Key. List the key numbers and titles of which firms(or branch offices, if appropriate)on the project team she example projects in the same order as they appear in Section were involved in the example project,and their roles. List in the F. same order as Section C. Section H. Additional Information. Section G. Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects. 30. Use this section to provide additional information This matrix is intended to graphically depict which key specifically requested by the agency or to address selection personne:identified in Section E worked on the example projects criteria that are not covered by the information provided in listed it Section F. Complete the following blocks(see example Sections A-G. below). Section I. Authorized Representative. 26, and 27. Names of Key Personnel and Role in this Contract. List the names of the key personnel and their 31.and 32. Signature of Authorized Representative and proposed roles in this contract in the same order as they appear Date. An authorized representative of a joint venture or the in Section E. prime contractor must sign and date the completed form. Signing attests that the information provided is current and 28. Example Projects Listed in Section F. In the column factual and that all firms or the proposed team agree to work on under each project key number(see block 29)and for each key the project. Joint ventures selected for negotiations must make person, place an"X"under the project key number for available a statement of participation by a principal of each participation in the same or similar role. member of the joint venture. 33. Name and Title. Self-explanatory. SAMPLE ENTRIES FOR SECTION G (MATRIX) 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F PERSONNEL CONTRACT (Fill in'Example Projects Key"section below first, before (From Section E, (From Section E, completing table. Place 'X"under project key number for Block 12) - Block 13) - participation in same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X X Jane A. Smah Chief Architect • • Joseph B. Williams chief Mechanical F.rigineer ', X X X X Tara C. Donovan Chief Electricial Engineer X X X •29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) 1 Federal Courthouse, Denver, CO 6 XYZ Corporation Headquarters, Boston, MA 2 Justin J. Wilson Federal Building, 7 Founder's Museum, Newport, RI Baton Rouge, LA STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 3 OF INSTRUCTIONS Part II-General QualificatIons See the"General Instructions"on page 1 for firms with branch 9. Employees by Discipline. Use the relevant disciplines and offices. Prepare Part II for the specifc branch office seeking associated function codes shown at the end of these instructions work if the firm has branch offices, and list in the same numerical order. After the listed disciplines, write in ar.y additional disciplines and leave the function code 1. Solicitation Number. If Part II is submitted for a specific blank. List no more than 20 disciplines. Group remaining contract. insert the agency's solicitation number and/or project i employees under"Other Employees"in column b. Each person number, if applicable,exactly as shown in the public can be counted only once according to his/her primary function. announcement or agency request. If Part II is prepared for a firm(including all branch off,ces),enter the number of employees by disciplines in column c(1). If Part II 2a-2e. Firm(or Branch Office)Name and Address. Self- is prepared to a branch office, and fnrer r the ere e in of employees explanaby tory. ). 3. Year Established. Enter the year the firm(or branch 10. Profile of Firm's Experience and Annual Average office, d appropriate)was established under the current name. Revee h offfor t S which this Part Completears. prepared.ilos forr the h! firm or breec 4. Unique Entity Identifier. Insert the unique entity identifier experience categories which most accurately reflect the firm's issued by the entity designated at SAM. See FAR part 4.6. technical capabilities and project experience. Use the relevant experience categories and associated profile codes shown at the 5. Ownership. end of these instructions, and list in the same numerical order. After the listed experience categories,write in any unlisted a, Type. Enter the type of ownership or legal structure of the relevant project experience categories and leave the profile firm(sole proprietor,partnership. corporation.joint venture,etc.). . codes blank. For each type of experience,enter the appropriate revenue index number to reflect the professional services b. Small Business Status. Refer to the North American revenues received annually(averaged over the last 5 years)by Industry Classification System(NAICS)code ih the public the firm or branch office for performing that type of work. A announcement, and indicate if the firm is a small business particular project may be identified with one experience category accorcing to the current size standard for that NAICS code(for or it may be broken into components,as best reflects the example, Engineering Services(part of NAICS 541330), capabilities and types of work performed by the firm. However, Architectural Services(NAICS 541310), Surveying and Mapping do not double count the revenues received on a particular Services(NAICS 541373)). The small business categories and project. the Internet website for the NAICS cedes appear in FAR part 19. Contact the requesting agency for any questions. Contact your 11. Annual Average Professional Services Revenues of Firm local U.S. Small Business Administration office for any questions for Last 3 Years. Complete this block for the firm or branch office regarding Business Status. for which this Part II is prepared. Enter the appropriate revenue index numbers to reflect the professional services revenues • fia-6c. Point of Contact. Provide this information for a received anrually(averaged over the last 3 years)by the firm or representative of the firm that the agency can contact for branch office. Indicate Federal,work(performed directly for the additional information. The representative must be empowered Federal Government,either as the prime contractor or to speak on contractual and policy matters. subcontractor), non-Federal work(all other comestic and foreign work, including Federally-assisted projects),and the total. If the 7. Name of Firm. Enter the name of the firm if Part II is firm has been in existence for less than 3 years,see the prepared for a branch office. definition for"Annual Receipts"under FAR 19.101. 8a-8c. Former Firm Names. Indicate any other previous 12. Authorized Representative. An authorized names for the firm(or branch office)during the last six years. representative of the firm or branch office must sign and date the Insert the year that this corporate name change was effective completed form. Signing attests that the information provided is and the associated unique entity identifier. This information is current and factual. Provide the name and title of the authorized used to review past performance on Federal contracts. representative who signed the form. STANDARD FORM 330 (REV.8/2016) PAGE 4 OF INSTRUCTIONS • List of Disciplines (Function Codes) Code Description Code Description 01 Acoustical Engineer 32 Hydraulic Engineer 02 Administrative 33 Hydrographic Surveyor 03 Aerial Photographer 34 Hydrologist 04 Aeronautical Engineer 35 Industrial Engineer 05 Archeologist 36 Industrial Hygienist 06 Architect 37 Interor Designer 07 Biologist 38 Lana Surveyor 08 CADD Technician 39 Landscape Architect 09 Cartographer 40 Materials Engineer 10 Chemical Engineer 41 Materials Handling Engineer I 11 Chemist 42 Mechanical Engineer 12 Civil Engineer 43 Mining Engineer 13 Communications Engineer 44 Oceanographer 14 Computer Programmer 45 Photo Interpreter 15 Construction Inspector 46 Photogrammetrisl 16 Construction Manager 47 Planner'. Urban/Reglonal 17 Corrosion Engineer 48 Project Manager 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 49 Remote Sensing Specialist 19 Ecologist 50 Risk Assessor 20 Economist 51 Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 21 Electrical Engineer 52 Sanitary Engineer 22 Electronics Engineer 53 Scheduler 23 Environmental Engineer 54 Security Specialist 24 Environmental Scientist 55 Soils Engineer 25 Fire Protection Engineer 56 Specifications Writer 26 Forensic Engineer 57 Structural Engineer ' ' 27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer 58 Technician/Analyst 28 Geodetic Surveyor 59 Toxicologist 29 Geographic Inforrna@on System Specialist 60 Transportation Engineer •• 30 Geolog'.st 61 Value Engineer 31 Healtn Facility Planner 62 Water Resources Engineer I STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 5 OF INSTRUCTIONS List of Experience Categories (Profile Codes) • Code Description Code Description Aol Acoustics, Noise Abatement E01 Ecological&Archeological Investigations E02 Educational Facilities; Classrooms A02 Aerial Photography;sirborne Data and Imagery E03 Electrical Studies and Design Collection and Analysis A03 Agricultural Development; Grain Storage; Farm Mechanization E04 Electronics A045 Air Pollution Control E05 Elevators: Escalators; People-Movers E06 Embassies and Chanceries A05 Airports', inaAirport Lighting',Aircraft FuelHandling E07 Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources A06 Airports;Terminals and Hangars', Freight Handling E08 Engineering Economics A07 Arctic Facilities E09 Environmental Impact Studies, A08 Animal Facilities Assessments or Statements ACS Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection El0 Environmental and Natural Resource A10 Asbestos Abatement Mapping All Auditoriums&Theaters Ell Environmental Planning AI2 Automation;Controls; Instrumentation Ell Environmental Remediation • El 3 Environmental Testing and Analysis ' B01 Barracks; Dormitories B02 Bridges F01 Fallout Snelters; Blast-Resistant Design F02 Field Houses;Gyms', Stadiums Cal Cartography F03 Fire Protection F04 Fisheries; Fish loaders CO2 Cemeteries (Planning&ftelocatlon) FO5 Forensic Engineering CO3 Charting: Nautical and Aeronautical FOE Forestry&Forest products C04 Chemical Processing &Storage COS Child Care/Development Facilities 001 Garages;Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; Parking Decks C06Churches; Chapels CU?G7 Coastal Engineering G02 Gas Systems(Propane', Natural, Etc.) CO8 Codes; Standards;Ordinances 003 Geodetic Surveying. Ground and Air-borne C09 Cold Storage: Refrigeration and Fast Freeze G04 Geographic Information System Services: C10 Commercial Building (low rise) Shopping Centers Development,Analysis, and Data Collection C11 Community Facilities GG5 Geospatial Data Conversion. Scanning, 012 Communications Systems;TV, Microwave Digitizing, Compilation,Attributing, Scribing. C13 Computer Facilities;Computer Service Drafting C14 Conservation and Resource Management GO6 Graphic Design C15 Construction Management Harbors'.Jetties; Piers, Ship Terminal C16 Construction Surveying 'Facilities �� C17 Corrosion Control; Cathodic Protection; Electrolysis H02 Hazardous Materials Handling and Storage ' C+8 Cost Estimating; Cost Engineering and H03 Hazardous,Toxic,Radioactive Waste Analysis; Parametnc Costing; Forecasting Remediation C19 Cryogenic Facilities H04 Heating,Ventilating,Air Conditioning HOS Health Systems Planning 001 Dams(Concrete;Arch) HOB Highrise;Air-Rights-TyPe Buildings Levees H07 Highways; Streets',Airfield Paving; Parking i D02 Dams (Earth;Rock);Dikes; Lots D03 Desalinization (Process&Facilities) HO8 Historical Preservation 004 Design-Build-Preparation of Requests for Proposals HO9 Hospital&Medical Facilities I DO5 Digital Elevation and Terrain Model Development H10 Hotels; Motels DOS Digital 0rthophotography H11 Housing (Residential, Mufti-Family DOS Dining Halls; Clubs; Restaurants Apartments; Condominiums) H12 Hydraulics&Pneumatics ' DOB Dredging Studies and Design H13 Hydrographic Surveying STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8!2016) PAGE 6 OF INSTRUCTIONS List of Experience Categories (Profile Codes continued) Code Description Code Description 101 Industrial Buildings', Manufacturing Plants P09 Product Machine Equipment Design 102 Industrial Processes', Quality Control P1C Pneumatic Structures Air-Support Buildings 103 Industrial Waste Treatment P11 Postal Facilities 104 Inteltgent Transportation Systems P12 Power Generation,Transmission,Distribution 105 Interior Design; Space Planning P13 Public Safety Facilities 108 Irrigation;Drainage RO1 Radar;Sonar; Radio&Radar Telescopes J01 Judicial and Courtroom Facilities R02 Radio Frequency Systems&Shleldings L01 Laboratories; Medical Research Facilities R03 Railroad, Rapid Transit L02 Land Surveying R04 Recreation Facilities(Parks,Mar nes, Etc.) LC3 La^dscape Architecture R05 Refrigeration Plants/systems L04 Libraries;Museums; Galleries R06 Rehabilitation(Buildings', Structres; Facilities) L05 Lighting(Interior; Display;Theater, Etc.) R07 Remote Sensing ' L06 Lighting(Exteriors;Streets Memorials; R08 Research Facilities Athletic Fields, Etc.) R09 Resources Recovery; Recycling M01 Mapping Location/Addressing Systems R10 Risk Analysis M02 Materials Handling Systems; Conveyors;Sorters R11 Rivers:Canals;Waterways; Flood Control M03 Metallurgy R12 Roofing M04 Microclimatology;Tropical Engineering Sal Safety Engineering;Accident Studies,OSHA • M05 Military Design Standards Studies M06 Mining &Mineralogy • 502 Security Systems; Intruder&Smoke Detection M07 Missile Facilities(Silos; Fuels;Transport) S03 Seismic Designs&Studies M08 Modular Systems Design; Pre-Fabricated Structures or 504 Sewage Collection,Treatment and Disposal Components • S05 Soils&Geologic Studies; Foundations S06 Solar Energy Utilization N01 Naval Architecture; Off-Shore Platforms 507 Solid Wastes;Incineration; Landfill NO2 Navigation Structures; Locks • S08 Special Environments;Clean Rooms, Etc. NO3 Nuclear Facilities; Nuclear Shielding SOB Structural Design; Special Structures 001 Office Buildings: Industrial Parks S10 Surveying; Platting;Mapping: Flood 002 Oceanographic Engineering Plain Studies 003 Ordnance; Munitions; Special Weapons SI1 Sustainable Design S12 Swimming Pools P01 Petroleum Exploration; Refining S13 Storrs Water Handling& Facilities P02 Petroleum and Fuel(Storage and Distribution) T01 Telephone Systems(Rural;Mobile;Intercom, P03 Photogrammetry Etc.) PO4 Pipelines(Cross-Country-Liquid&Gas) T02 Testing&Inspection Services P05 Planning(Community, Regional,Areawide and State) T03 Traffic&Transportation Engineering P06 Planning(Site, Installation, and Project) T04 Topographic Surveying and Mapping T05 Towers(Self-Supporting&Guyed Systems) P07 Plumbing&Piping Design TOS Tunnels&Subways PO8 Prisons&Correctional Facilities STANDARD FORM 330(REV.812016) PAGE 7 OF INSTRUCTIONS List of Experience Categories (Profile Codes continued) Code Description • U01 Unexploded Ordnance Remediation UC2 Urban Renewals;Community Development UO3 Utilities(Gas and Steam) VOt Value Analysis; Life-Cycle Costing `A01 Warehouses&Depots i WO2 Water Resources; Hydrology: Ground Water W03 Water Supply:Treatment and Distribdtion W04 W nd Tunnels; Research/Testing Facilities Design 201 Zoning; Land Use Studies STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 8 OF INSTRUCTIONS • ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I -CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1 TILE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOJC:TATION OR PROJECT NUMBER B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4. NAME AND 7TLE • 5. NAME OF FIRM B. TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FM NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS • C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) �h- 9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11, ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT s 'n'r a. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. LJ CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE • C. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE d. ❑CHECK HE BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑ (Attached) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) • E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM • 15- FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and Stele) - 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) IT. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(Slate end Discipline) 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publica(ons,Organizeliong..Training,Awards,etc.) • 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS • (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and Slate) ;2)YEAR COMPLETED ' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(It applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Eider scope,size.cost,etc)AND SPECIFIC ROLE fl Check if project performed with current firm • a. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and Stale) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost etc)AND SPECIFIC ROLE fl Gheck if project performed with current firm b. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and Slate) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Baer scope,size,cost.e!C.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE check if project performed with current firm 0. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City end State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) d (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION!enef scoot size.cost etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE EiGheolt if project performed with current firm (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and Vete) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERV,CES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (B)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Stye(scope,she,cost,elc)ANC SPECIFIC ROLE �GNBGk if project performed with current firm e. I STANDARD FORM 330(REV.812016)PAGE 2 F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete ono Section F for each project.) 2'. TITLE AND LOCATION(Gfy and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION dl applicable) 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 21. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope,size,and cast) 25. HRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION phi and State) (3)ROLE a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and Slate) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(Cly and State) (3)ROLE C. (i)FIRM NAME 2)FIRM LOCATION(Gly and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. 1(1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(Cly and State) (3)ROLE f. STANDARD FORM 330 (REV.8/2016)PAGE 3 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS • 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F 26. PER KEY 27. CONTINCTIS (Fill in"Examole Projects Key"section below before completing table. PERSONNEL CONTRACT Place"X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) ' (From Section E Block 12) (From Section E, Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 fi 7 8 9 10 _-■ II I • • • • • • 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 5 10 STANDARD FORM 330(REV. 8/2016)PAGE 4 H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. • • I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE 33. NAME AND TITLE STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016)PAGE 5 1. SOLICITA11ON NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART II -GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a. FIRM(Orarench OMceI NAME 3. YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER 2b. STREET 5, OWNERSHIP a.TYPE 2c CITY 2d STATE 2e. ZIP CODE 0.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS ea. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7, NAME OF FIRM Or Block 28 Is a Branch Office) Sb, TELEPHONE NUMBER Sc. E-MAIL ADDRESS as. FORMER FIRM NAME(S)Or any) 8b. YEAR ESTABLISHED Eo. UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER 9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10. PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS c.Number of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index a.Function b.Discipline b.Experience Number Code (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code (see below) • • • • Other Employees Total 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM 1. Less fPan$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$6 million FOR LAST 3 YEARS (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million ' a. Federal Work 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9, $25 million to less than$50 million b. Non-Federal Work 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE b.DATE 0.NAME AND TITLE STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016)PAGE 6 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANTS RESPONSE TO THE (RFQ) Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 1 of 2 tit Deeenmenl or Srsce / Drorsron of Corporations / Search Records / By Document Number/ Detail by FEI/EIN Number Florida Profit Corporation E SCIENCES, INCORPORATED Filing Information Document Number P00000081584 FEI/EIN Number 59-3667002 Date Filed 08/29/2000 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 02/09/2011 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 34 EAST PINE ST ORLANDO. FL 32801 Changed' 09/29/2009 Mailing Address 34 EAST PINE ST ORLANDO. FL 32801 Changed. 09/29/2009 Registered Agent Name&Address BASSETT,JAMES S 34 E. PINE STREET ORLANDO. FL 32801 Name Changed:01/05/2005 Address Changed:07/14/2009 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title PTD PARTLOW, PETER K 34 E. PINE STREET ORLANDO, FL 32801 http://search.sunb iz.org/Inquiry/Corporat ions earch/SearchResu l tDetai I?inqui... 8/7/2018 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 2 of 2 Title VSD BASSETT,JAMES S 34 E. PINE STREET ORLANDO, FL 32801 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2016 01/19/2016 2017 01/05/2017 2018 01/02/2018 Document images O 1/02,2018—ANNUAL REPORT View unage in PDF formal )1,05e2017 ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/19/2016—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal O 2/04/2015 ANNUAL REPORT View Image in PDF formal 01/02/2014—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 01842013—ANNUAL REPORT View image in POE format 01/1912012—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 02/09/2011—Amendment View image in PDF formal O'1311201I—ANNUAL REPORT View image in POE formal 01108/20'0—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format O F 14,2009—Rep.Accent Change View image in PDF formal 0104/2009—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 0201,2008—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04,18/2907 ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/31/2006—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 01105,2005 ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 01/092004—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/21/2003—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 05/05/2002—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 05/02)2001 ANNUAL REPORT View image in POE format 0&29200—Domesllc Profit View image in PDF format http://search.sunb iz.org/Inquiry/C orporation Searc h/S earchResu ItDetai l?inqui... 8/7/2018 Scie ces COPY Miami Beach RFQ Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center RFQ No. 2018-027-WG Due: Friday, February 16, 2018 3:00 p.m. EST Submitted to: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department-3rd Floor trA MIAMIBEACH 1755 Meridian Avenue Miami Beach, Florida 33139 1 1/11/il I t f f ''410440.4t. ' / WWI ."- .+ . ' . J V't ,41-40*,,, 1 �� ''+'��I�ili�I�++++ • it•li'; - ff u _+ `� `;v ,. o - Intl MIAMI BEACH ONVENTION CENTER 224 SE 9th Street Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954)484-8500 www.esciencesinc.com Tab 1 Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications R . 11111% if-1 Sciences ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGICAL City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the RFQ 2018-027-WG, for Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soils and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center. E Sciences, Incorporated (E Sciences)is pleased to express our interest and provide qualifications for the City's review and consideration. We understand that the City requires professional consulting services specifically detailed in the RFQ. Key benefits E Sciences will bring the City include the following: Understanding of the City and the Project: E Sciences' senior staff has worked in Miami Beach since the initial stages of the renaissance of South Beach and we have provided environmental engineering and science services directly for our existing continuing services agreement since 2011. One of our projects was the Phase I and II ESAs for this project. E Sciences was the entity that discovered the contamination issue. We repeatedly assisted the renovation contractors' environmental consultants on our own time to ensure that the consultants had proper information so that contamination was handled properly. We are very familiar with their work as well. Continuity of your environmental consultant brings continuity and ease for the momentum of this project. Because the assessment needs to be initiated prior to completion of the renovation project, our previous knowledge on this project will allow us to hit the ground running and meet your schedule commitments. Solid Project Approach: Our approach to this project incorporates three complementary and beneficial aspects: Financial, Technical and Regulatory. Our approach will provide financial reimbursement for site assessment and rehabilitation, build on the previous assessments conducted (E Sciences, Kimley Horn and Geosyntec) incorporate regulatory strategies to minimize the need for active remediation, take advantage of planned capital projects and incorporate provisions for protecting the health and safety of the City's residents, tourists and the business community, while minimizing inconvenience to the community. Agency Coordination Expertise: E Sciences' professionals are known for their skill in agency coordination and sensitive negotiations. We are repeatedly called upon to unravel complex environmental situations and structure difficult projects which have stalled or derailed. We have an excellent reputation with the regulatory agencies, including a working relationship with Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources. Experienced and Proven Project Management: Our firm has chosen Nadia G. Locke, PE, LEED AP, Senior Engineer, to be project manager. Ms. Locke brings over 29 years of proven expertise and understanding of South Florida's regional environmental challenges and opportunities, as well as extensive experience in managing municipal and contamination projects, including intimate familiarity with this project. Ms. Locke specializes in managing a broad range of environmental engineering projects related to pollution remediation, environmental permitting, NEPA documentation, grant preparation and litigation support. She is past President of the Florida Brownfields Association, and South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals. We have selected Ms. Maria Paituvi, PE, Senior Engineer to be the deputy project manager. Ms. Paituvi has been working day-to-day with City staff to ensure that our internal deadlines and budgets are being met. We view this contract as an important opportunity to continue our strong relationship with the City. We respectfully request your consideration for selection on this contract. Sincerely, E SCIENCES, INCORPO ED OCkg Q Nadia G. Locke, PE, LEED AP Peter K. Partiow, PE Associate/Project Manager President -ac m, Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-1 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Table of Contents Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter 1-1 Table of Contents 1-2 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire&Requirements Affidavit 1-3 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1-9 a) Certificate of Authorization by the State of Florida 1-9 Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proper Team(SF 330) 2-1 2.2 Qualifications of Prime Proposer 2-28 2.3 Qualifications of Prime Proposer's Team 2-30 Tab 3 Approach and Methodology 3.1 Approach and Methodology 3-1 3.2 Workload 3-6 1 •s Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-2 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit In the following page(s) please find the fully executed Appendix A. Ste,No: Saiafrxn rde: RFQ 2018.027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Sal and Groundwater for The hfrarri Beach Convention Center Proaye:nerd Can'act Tet Ernl: Witham Garviso.CPPB 305 673-7000#6650 WlliamGarri;ogmiamibeadifl.gcv STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1 General Proposer Information. FRU NAUE: E Sciences, Incorporated No dYern in Name= No cf Yee s n Bosom LOG f No cf_rpioyem 17 17 OThERNAME(S)PRCPCSER'eASCFEtATEDUNDER INT!€L+lST10YE.Ai : None FRU PROA RY AD fE.r MEAret LARTERSl: 34 E.Pine Street • Orlando • Florida p 032801 TE iiCNENC: 407.481.9006 TCt_Ff NC.: N/A FAX NO.: 407.481.9627 FEN FOCAL AD:RESS: 224 SE 9th Street • Fort Lauderdale STATE: ZP CCCE Florida 33316 PRIAA Y ACCOUNT REPRESENTAm E FCR MIS EEGAGEEENT: Nadia Locke. PE ACCCUYT REP TE:_Pl-ONE so.: 954.484.8500 ACCCUlT REP TOLL FREE NO.: NIA ACCCUNT REP e14 L: nlocke@esciencesinc.com FEERAL TAX IC€iTIFICATICN VC.: 59-3667002 The city reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including Out not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evacuate aye capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements_ RFQ 201$-027—WG 17 ( �„ Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-3 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Proposer claims a veteran awned business status? LYES I X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status sial submit a Cccumerdaticn proving mat firm is certified as a veteran-owned busiless or a service-disabled veteran owned business by ire State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest Al Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,dce:lor,agent,or immedate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach_ Funnel alP.ropcsers must disci se the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in Inc Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family rnerrher (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)vino is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach_ Proposers must also disclose me name of any Cay employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entry cr any of Its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer snail submit at least three(3)references Itr whom the Proposer has completed wort Sink,/in size and nature as the work referenced n solicitation_ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submtted,the following nformal=is required: 1] Frm Name, 2)Contact Individual Name&Tete,3)Address,4)Teephone,5)Contacts Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Pc poser ever been debarred,suspended or Omer lecal uautian,or had a contract canceled Cue to non-peKormance Cy ubtc sem or agency? YES NC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is'YES.'Proposer shall subtra a statement deMiling the reasons Oat led Da action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to tie or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified it Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the Cay Code. Proposers stall be safety responsible for ensuring Orad 3d applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform teras are compied with,and saltie be subject to any and all sanricns, as prescribed Merlin,including disqua imation of Cleft Proposals,in the event of sur d non-complance_ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Submit the names of al ndividuals or entities (Wading your sub-wnsuiinCs)lib a ct MON financial interest as defined in soicitation.For each individual or entity with a con1rofing financial interest indircade whether or nod cacti individual or entity has contributed to one campaign either directly or indirectly,of a gndifrate who nos been elected to Me office of Mayor or City Cornmissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity mat seeks lo do h o.ness with trie City stall adopt a Code of Business Ethics('Code")and submit Slat Code to the Department of Procurement Management w'ri its proposauresponse or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Propo_-r,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations includng, among others, the conflict of interest, lot Ord and ethics provision of me City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shal submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitrig Code of 8:1srress Emits,Proposer may submit a statement ndicating mat it wi adopt,as required in the ordinance,Ine City of Miami beach Code of EOtics,available at www.miarnibeache.gowprocuuemenV. RFQ 2018-027—VVG 18 ( ref Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-4 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 7. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners_When awarding clunpetrierr solicited contra=valued at over 5100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full tine employees on their Farces Cuing 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requ r s,main contractors doing busness 'urn the City of Miami Beach,who are avrareed a contract pursuant 10 competitive proposals,to pnoi ce•Equal Benefits'ho their employees sin domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses.The Ordinance appies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and tie Contractors emalc'lee;located in ane United Stales, but outside of the Ciy of Miami Beach limits,who are direcIty performing wont on the contract•aurin the Chi}'of Miami Beach. A. Coes your company provide or offer access 10 any beltefis to employees witZn spouses Cr Do spouses of employees? F-1YE5 1---1 NO B. Coes your company provide or offer access to airy benefits 10 employees with(same Cr apposite sex)=nit partners'or Do domestic partners of employees? YE5 NO C_ Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list n me'other°section any additional benefit not already spedhed. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse cr domestic partner, such as bereavement weave;other benefits are provided clirecxy to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Finn Provides for Frm does hat Employees with plo es with Provide Benefit Spouses Dornesrc Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Fame/Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons oulsiae your control,(eJ�1-,mere are no insurance providers in your area witting to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasona®le Measures compliance.To campy on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Appicaton (attached)wilt all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application 1'il to reviewed for ccnsderation by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Managers decisions hna_Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at wwwmiamibeachft.govprocrrement/. k.FQ 2018-027–WG 19 I •• Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-5 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center g. Public Entity Crimes_Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,3e currently enacted cr as amended from time to time,states that a person or af5iate who has been place",on the convicted vender list 5:Cowing a ccnvcbarr`or a public entity crime tray nct submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a pubic entity; may not submit a propose!, proposal,or reply cn a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public bu&Ceng or public wort;may nct sutmt proposals,proposals,cr replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, suppler,subcontractor,or consultant under a ecntrract with any pubic entity,and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amcurt provided in s.2n7 017 fcr CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months fdlcwing the date of being pLbcec on the convicted vendor fist. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this atfdavt document,Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 267.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016.3990,the Gty shall not enter irto a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will nct engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)cf the Cay Code,including the blackisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal wth a person or entity when such action is cased cn race,odor,national origin,relgicn,sex,irtersexrality.gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age cr disablily. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11 Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375. the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to oe states of North Carola and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods u ser ices sourced in North Carolina and Mississipp. =roccser srali agree that no travel shal occur on behalf of the City to North Canine or htssissippi,nor steal any prods_t cr services It proeces tc the City be sourced frcm these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtae of executing this affidavit dccurrer1,Propose•a;rets it is and shall remain In full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Financial Capacity.At the request of the City,proposer shall arrange kir Dun&Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Cualication Repert(SQR)directly to the Procurement Cental named herein.The cost of the preparation of the SOR shat be the respcesibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shat request the SQR report from Ci&B at https:l supplierportal.dnb.com webappfwcslstoreslservlet/SupplierPortal?atoreld=1196 13. Fair Chance Requirement.Beginning on December 1,2016,the city shall not enter into a contra ,resulting from a ccmpetfree scliolation issued pursuant to this article,with a business ur css the bus ress certifies in writing that the business nas adopted and enplcys written policies,praciaces,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordnance set forth in snide V cf chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required,By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shal remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 14. Acknowledgement of Addendum. Atter issuance of sotcitatcn,the City may release one or more addendum to the solictation which may =vide additional information to proposers or alter soidtabon requirements. The City wil strive tc reach every Proposer having received sdicitaticn through the City's e-procurement system, PublIc?urrtase.com. however, Proposers are solely respcnsble for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to scidtation.This Acknowledgement cf Addendum section certifies that the Propcser has received all addendum released by the Cat pursuant to this sctcitaticn.Failure tc obtain and acknowledge receipt of al addendum may result in proposal disqualification. mel a Curtin Inoel lo Colum Intel tv Carkm Rece0 Receipt Reoetit X "MX Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 X Myi Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 X _ Addendum 3 Addendum 8 _ Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cower RFC) 2018-027-WG 20 ( ; s Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-6 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center DISCLOSURE NV DISCLAIMER SECTION The solint4en referenned heein is keirg triished to the nanipied V!).tha City of Miani Beath Ithe tiityrj for the renipert's nom ecleine Pr y thkei by the Cite in 1.)- rorbe to Staten et cf Quatfinatior6 mai Nrsualt to thr;sclinittion, cr in m 4ing Etiy&lard,cr or retbing to make any awarl rtirstart to such Sthtemeit of Qtalfindions, or ii car c ding attar*, cr in with or iiaNelIng this solinitten,ether kefore or after issuanne ci a Ewan*;hal be uithott Eny lie:tilt./or cbliJaticri on The pat cf the City. I rt its sole iiSnretion,the City may withiiau the solint4ion eithe before cr Me Statement cf kalif batiori;„ may accept or rejeA Stitenert of QuaifinatiorG, aid may a:nept S tten ert cf Queifinatiorb which...evidefrom the sciinitation Er; k deems 4.)prortiate aid in its best inte.rest In it;solelsnreicn„tte mar deerm ine.the(tiatfinaticris and Ei;f:eitiiilty of any pity or parties stibmittng Striicit cf Qtalfindiori; in response to ttis sciinithticn. Follovirri submission of Stem eyt of Qtalfinatior6„ the arplinait agrees to such firther detais, irform diori and assure:in:4 innludirg and d.:;;..:—L".51.4te. th, relaing to the Steen ert of Q talfingors ard the arplbant indtriirs vithoit limrtor the apFlinEnts affiliAes, cffines,drentrs,shaeicikies,parties arr.i em owe;,as rei:fieztel by the Cty in its disnrejon The nformation nortanet tenth.)is pre sciely fortha nctiverierple cf Kos Prposals.It is the resjorbiblity of the recipient to assure itself tkat inform Act)ccniiie:h. eiriis ainurate arid ccur'Iete.The City dais not praiide any a ssurames as to the anntrany of any inform Act)in this so initition Arly rdiaine on the:e nontaits,or on Eny Fen itta:Inorn m i.nindiort;with City cfrinials, be the renOiels own ris k.P rcposals s hotid rely excliziuely on tiler own inuestigatictis,irterpretticns,aid watt s .The sciiiiithtion b beng Frovided by the City wthott an"warranty or rerresertiticn,e,press or im flied,a;to is ncritent it;acclrany.,or it nciiipleens.No warrarty or rerreseithlion is in ace h the City or it aifirts th4 any Stenert ofCttalfin4iorb c:n,fctmir,i to these reTirem alt.; will he seleted for ncrsicerdion, ne9citiaticri, or aprrod al. The City shel hale rc ceil4stion cr liiity with nr3peitto this solinitticn,the selection and the award process,cr wheiler any award"iii ke m-aik.. Any reck.iierit ci this sclinititicri who rc-L;perids heetofiAlly anknceleirjas I the provision.;cf*is Circ kistire and Disc im in,is totally relyng cnths Dbclosure and Disc;aim End ajreas tO be bcurii by the term;heed Any Sthtem ait cf Quaifinatictis subm ittei to the City pursuEnt to thi;sdinithtico are submitted attire sole risk and resronsiiilly of the party submitting such Stitema•it of Qualifindens. This sdinithlicn b made s'ken"to nctra:ticti of e.trors, cfnissicns,Cr with:traual from the marI4 with:kit mike..Infcrin atiCri Es fcr gtidaine only,and ities rick nctistitute al cr arr.;fart of ari The City arid el Pr:loses will be kotnd orly as,if aid when a Sthtemert cf Qtalfindens, a same ma,'be in cdiied,awl the Efirlinakie defiritiue ay:earn eiti petering the-etc. are arprcoed aid etenutel by the rtie;„and the) only postal to the tam; of the defiritioe agreenerts e:oantted am cog the pates.Any respprbe to this sclinithlicti may ke accented or teen:Jed by the City for any re.woil orfcr no reason with:titan./ resuttnt tothe City. The City 'a gco area b, the Ocite.rmertintle-Strishne Lau, aid all titem it cf Qualifindicns aid suKortirg (ban arts subject to disnlc,sure as re:like:1 by sunh taut Sten art of C.,talifinatiorG shell be;limited in sealed rtorosal fctin aid shell rem an, confii:erfal to the intent pein del ky FIcti StAttes, thtil the (ate End time s ee;te..1 for°paring the resporces. ut ttzt time., all dont/netts raieitia:i by the Ciy shall become public P rCVOSals are eve..tel to make al asnlostres and de:argon; as requeTted in this solbit4bri Ey submission d a Steen eit cf Qcalicorw,the Proposer anknowleites ard ayee;ttBt the City ha;the right to make aly inr.f.4i-y Cr inue:Myllicr,it deems appropriate sub5thrhate cr stircilen ert Won:rigor)nctithne4 in the Stitement of Qualifinations, aid a'. rize the release to the Cty of any End all inform aticn sotrjiit in such rikliiry or nuesticption Each PrCrSe certifies Th d the inform on ncrithired inthe StEtene.rt ci Quatrfin diOrr5 i; true,anntrate.End ccm plete„to the best of it;knowlaiii*,nformatiory and kelef. NotwiltutirKing the foreying cr anyting ncntaired ri tie solinitticti„all Prorosab arca thet in the eueit cf anal urappeEiable jokiMert by a(;ottt cf.1:v1pda-it junAidico wElch imrc;,,4; ct)the(Ay err,. liakility awing art of the$oliciatim,or any rwporae thaleto, or aly action cr irantion kJ.?tie Cite with respect theeto,stbh ;11Ibe limited to$10,0C(1.00 a5aiiteei-Gtion aid liquidated turn 4jes.T he preuiotb serteine itquaier, shill rot ke ncri5truat to circum wait arc; of the other Kalb:ion; of this DiSioSI.0?. and Disclaimer *jai iM poses no'gility on the City. In the eueit of an kiffeeices in laniliage betieen this Cisclosure and Disntimer and the balance of the solbtior it is undestood tha the rroub Orb of this Disclosure and Cisnlaimer shell always gai ern.The 5olinithticti aid arr(dispttes aising from the sdinittico shell be gouered by and nctistrued ii,anncotrine with the laws ci the State of FIctida RFQ 2018-027—WO 21 bow" Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-7 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Sod and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I. as an authorized agert of the Proposer am submittirw the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditionai acceptance of the terms and conditions of this cocument, Inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and 0isctalmer Statement proposer acrees to be bound to any and all specifications. terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the Mowing are requrements of this solicitation and failure to comply wit result in disqualification cf proposal submitted Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has rot colluded pith any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State cf Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;all responses,data and information contained in this proposal, ndusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirerrents Affidavit are true and accurate. terns cf Prnpaer's At:hated Repceexrattie: Tfie cl Proposer's A ithctaed Repreeenletr et Peter Partiow, PE President *mut c r's Auraited/testate:naie Data 1 . 2/12,201 8 State of 1.-0 , ) Cn this i 2-day ofb��+y 2025 fersen appeared before me Rtrri✓Paa.�.ynno County of O 9-444,16G- ) stated that(seg)is the yaks,acdvr of C fc-,t= s a corporation,and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrjrrent to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: GARGITN Y r467EA ,,((1 f h yr ccMd' tti t FF t te? Notary Pub J� Staleof P7.. jrt i EXPIRES,.cetthe 2,2028 My Commission i t7 lon i j t,�'f„, grad 11n Mohr'wane Ukwerkrs AFC) ot8-OZT-WG 22 Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-8 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements E Sciences is providing the following documentation to meet the eligibility requirements set forth in Appendix Cl of the RFQ. State of Florida Depart»ierit of State I certify from the records of tlus office that E SCIENCES.INCORPORATED is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida.filed on August 29.2000. The document number of this corporation is P000000S1534 I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31.2013.that its most recent annual report uniform business report was filed on January 2.2013.and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of f7orida at Tallahassee.the Capital.this mfr,, the Second day of January,2013 w...7,.,,._ ....,,,,.1 / lexAN 04.t1r4A Tracking Number:CCi441713941 To authenticate this certificate,Ti:it the following nte.enter this number,and then follow the instruc dont displa.ed. 1ttps: senices.sunbia.org Fllinr,t C ertificateOfS tam:.CertifieateAnthenticanoil R'C SCOTT OO.tSS..,I KFM LAWSON-.CRETAR, STATE OF FLORIDA State of Florida DEMRTAIEBOARD OFNT OF BUSPROFOLOGISTS ESSIONAL AND NALPROFESSIONAL REGUUTgN Board of Professional Engineers wneGEOLOGY 9ltstNESS "`', ' Namur wow CERT1FtEO •,_+•.E Attests cunt Unaa,N oto.nauot Cinder A92 FS 11 fil,Icese.Incorporated Fw tee one Huta':ose 4I BP o, v f s F SCIENCES INCORPIXtATED le aslbaeraed soden the peuelM neat$.a ftmne.,to offer enQineerinR eerrlc. >a EAST PINE STREET ORLANDO FL]2502 C ��^to it pMlc through a Hrofeeisnal aseirm r nod.C heprr..471,Florid*Slaw.e. i_T-,V, P.apisdnw _:n;oIO CA IJc.N.. 0. ...4:9, Audit No: .v<le0]N1 N ...ED WADS. COSPIAY AS REWIRED BY LAW :t:.l:MA ICU011M Gans Tab 1 Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements—Page 1-9 Tab 2 Experience & Qualifications 111kces -'44■1 II 10'' ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGICAL City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications The City of Miami Beach is a prominent community that offers a unique mix of urban and natural environments. The Intracoastal Waterway, Indian Creek, canals, beaches and 30 municipal parks and green space areas provide the community and visitors with recreational opportunities dependent upon the City's environmental stewardship. Miami Beach's commitment to urban environmental management and redevelopment is another example of the City's environmental stewardship, working toward conserving resources and responsible use of existing infrastructure and previously developed land. Miami Beach promotes environmental responsibility and E Sciences understands how important the convention center is and how the expansion of this area is another opportunity for the City to demonstrate itself as a world leader. The City requires a consultant with broad knowledge and an experience base to address the environmental issues so that they do not complicate capital projects, impact nearby businesses or create concerns for residents. We look forward to continuing our partnership with the City to proactively, efficiently and safely complete the site assessment activities required by DERM and develop strategies to manage contamination impacts in place without the need for large scale active remediation. Under this section of the RFQ response, we highlight some of our project experience through project descriptions and resumes under section 2.1, and qualifications or our firm and staff in sections 2.2 and 2.3. You will see from this information that we have the experience and qualifications to move this complex project forward responsibly and proactively. With respect to our workload, E Sciences staff has plenty of availability to assist. Our proposed Project Manager, Ms. Locke, manages only select projects and she is very excited about managing this one. 2.1 Standard Form 330 In the following pages please find our Standard Form 330 c.• Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications—Page 2-1 ARCHITECT- ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I -CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A.CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER Monday,December 14,2017 2018-027-WG B.ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Nadia G.Locke,PE,Project Manager/Senior Engineer/Associate 5.NAME OF FIRM E Sciences,Incorporated !rte Frd6^Ill RING(! Ces f^'""ON'';vTAI ECOI.°GI:A:. 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS (954)484-8500 (954)484-5146 nlocke@esciencesinc.com C.PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) Check >= 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT V a a. X E Sciences,Incorporated 224 SE 9th Street PRIME Fort Lauderdale,FL 33316 ®CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. X JAEE 3101 Peachtree Circle Subcontractor—Drilling Davie,FL 33328 O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE c, X SGS Accutest,Inc. 4405 Vineland Road,Suite C-15 Subcontractor—Laboratory Orlando,FL 32811 Services O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE Everglades Waste Removal 700 SE 32nd Court Subcontractor—Waste d. X Services Fort Lauderdale,FL 33316 Removal Services O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE 9. O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE h. O CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D.ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM O (Attached) Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications- Page 2 -2 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Nadia G.Locke, P.E.,LEED AP Project Manager/Senior Engineer a TOTAL b WITH CURRENT FIRM 29.7 15.7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) E Sciences,Incorporated,Fort Lauderdale,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(SrATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S., Materials Science and Engineering,University of Florida, 1988 Professional Engineer:FL-58676 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) LEED AP Neighborhood Development, Certified FDEP Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector #3263 and Instructor#130; OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER 1 8 Hour Site Supervisor; NAUI/PADI Advanced Open Water Diver; Florida Brownfields Association; Florida Bar Environmental Law and Land Use Section;Florida Redevelopment Association;Smart Growth Partnership 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2011 -Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm a KEY PROJECT Ms. Locke is the contract manager for an ongoing consulting contract to conduct miscellaneous environmental services for -; the City. Services conducted include Groundwater Elevations Monitoring and Mapping Project (Sea Level Rise Study), preparation of spill prevention control and countermeasure plans for 12 facilities including pump stations, fire stations, public works yard, Phase I and II ESAs of the Miami Beach Convention Center expansion project,tree canopy analysis, assessment and regulatory closure of the green waste facility and environmental permitting for a canoe/kayak launch.Contract Budget/Fees:$888,858 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Atlantic Housing Partners,Lakewood Pointe,Seffner,Florida and Rolling PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Green Apartments,Sarasota,Florida 2007-Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm b. KEY PROJECT' For over 10 years, E Sciences has been providing environmental consulting services for Atlantic Housing Partners. Services have regularly included Phase I ESA portfolios once or twice each year. When Recognized Environmental Conditions are identified, Atlantic Housing Partners engages us to conduct Phase II ESAs. On a few occasions, they have purchased contaminated properties and we have conducted full assessment and remediation.Notable projects include Lakewood Pointe Brownfield Site and Rolling Green.Both of these are large tracts of land with arsenic contamination.Contract Budget/Fees:$353,511 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED .City of North Miami Beach General Environmental Engineering Services- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Taylor Park,City of North Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2010 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm KEY PROJECT.l Taylor Park has been slated for redevelopment since 1999, when the FDEP had their Brownfields contractor conduct a Brownfields Assessment of the site. The assessment revealed metals and petroleum in the soil and metals in the groundwater. In 2005, assessment activities revealed the presence of buried solid waste on most of the 21.8-acre property. Since that time, c. environmental issues have continued to restrict and complicate redevelopment efforts for the property.The property is currently occupied by an inactive ball field,an operating daycare facility,vacant land and a lake.Ms.Locke was the engineer of record and project manager for the assessment and conceptual remediation design for the property. The remediation planning was closely coordinated with the community desires,the City's needs and the park master planners to ensure a solution to remedy the environmental issues in conjunction with all of the stakeholder needs. She represented the City in two meetings with residents and other public meetings. E Sciences is currently the design criterial professional implementing the remediation while working for the County. This is a large tract of land with arsenic contamination, among other environmental issues. Contract Budget/Fees:$145,701 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Brownfields Assessment and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Remediation Services,Former West Palm Beach City Hall,Palm Beach 2008-2014 N/A County,Florida (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm d. KEY PROJECT]] Ms. Locke was the contract manager for this TCRPC contract for conducting assessment and remediation services as part - of an EPA Brownfield Assessment Grant.This contract focused on assessment and remediation of Brownfields.One of the projects was the West Palm Beach City Hall. Ms. Locke worked on the completion of a Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA and Site Assessment Report for the former West Palm Beach City Hall,in 2014 E Sciences negotiated with FDEP implementation of a soil management plan in lieu of a remedial action plan, saving the client approximately$1M in cleanup costs. . Fees for Master TCRPC Contract:$353,047; Project Fees: $124,259 Tab 2 Experience& Qualifications Page 2-3 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ruck's Park/Former Pioneer Gardens, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of North Miami,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2014—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm �KEYPROJECTIi E Sciences was engaged by the City of North Miami in 2016 to assist them with managing documented contamination e - issues related to the following historical activities: wastewater sludge pond, street sweepings storage, plant nursery, underground storage tank. E Sciences is working with the City to address the contamination issues through conducting site assessment that will enable the City to develop the site for elderly, affordable housing. Contaminants of concem include arsenic, coliform, ammonia, dieldrin and polynyclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Our approach is to focus testing in the areas necessary to define the extent of impacts and areas of potential concern related to the future land use(e.g.drainage,green space,etc.).A Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement was executed between the City of North Miami and Miami-Dade County on December 23,2014.Contract Budget/Fees:$69,622 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Brownfield Assessment and Remediation Contract—Henrietta Bridge Farm, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of West Palm Beach,Palm Beach,Florida 2017-Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm f. FEY PROJECT 1 E Sciences initially evaluated the suitability of this property for use as a community farm under a separate contract with the TCRPC.Through incremental sampling methodology we determined that the soils were contaminated.E Sciences assisted the City of West Palm Beach in obtaining a$200,000 cleanup grant under the EPA Brownfields Program.We were currently implementing the cleanup which will allow in-ground planting of fruit trees and vegetables for consumption. Fees for Master TCRPC Contract: $353,047; Project fees for TCRPC$47,702;Budget for City Contract:$180,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead Professional Services Agreement—Continuing PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Professional Services,City of Homestead,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2014—Ongoing N/A g (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Ms. Locke is providing technical oversight for this continuing services contract. To date, E Sciences staff conducted a NEPA and environmental permitting review task for parcels to be used for hurricane debris staging and analyzing permitting needs and wetland mitigation options for the City-owned, 10.2-acre parcel.Project Budget/Fees:$19,005 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Broward County Mass Transit Copans Road Facility, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Broward County,Florida 2007—2015 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm KEY PROJECTII Ms. Locke provided environmental oversight and reporting on this project,which was the largest underground storage tank (UST)system upgrade project in the State of Florida.The project included upgrade of a fueling system with 13 USTs and a combined total volume of 392,000 gallons.The upgrade also includes hundreds of feet of used oil piping within the bus maintenance building. h. Ms.Locke also negotiated$50,000 reimbursement funding for the project under the State of Florida's Limited Source Removal Initiative. Prior to the upgrade, the scope included conducting a baseline assessment of the groundwater contaminant concentrations and support the bidding process for the design build project. The baseline assessment was designed to provide justification for state funding for residual petroleum impacts around the USTs and to aid in planning the management of impacted soil and groundwater during the UST replacement. While working on the baseline assessment, a fuel delivery resulted in an off-site diesel fuel discharge. Ms. Locke provided the county with guidance on how to abate the source, reduce potential third party liability, and assisted with negotiating an off-site access agreement. Ms. Locke then conducted a limited contamination assessment to satisfy the regulatory requirements.Project Budget/Fees:$210,421 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Brownfields Job Training Program SupportJNPDES Stormwater Erosion and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sedimentation Inspector Training,Miami,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm E Sciences was engaged by the City of Miami to conduct Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Inspector Training to support its Brownfields Job Training Grant Program. E Sciences trained over 30 new inspectors in this job training program. The Program is an EPA- funded curriculum designed to recruit, train, and place predominantly low-income, minority, unemployed and under-employed residents, including veterans from solid and hazardous waste-impacted communities. Ms. Locke provided training to engineers, project managers, contractors and inspectors in accordance with FDEP protocol for certification.Project Budget/Fees:$21,900 Tab 2 Experience & Qualifications Page 2-4 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Maria Paituvi,P.E. Project Engineer/Deputy Project Manager aTOTAI b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 11.6 8.4 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) E Sciences,Incorporated,Fort Lauderdale,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) B.S. Environmental Engineering Sciences,University of Florida,2005 FL Professional Engineer#73008 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) OSHA 40 Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response; Certified FDEP Stormwater, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Inspector No.27077 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2011—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Ms. Paituvi works closely with the City on various projects under our existing environmental engineering contracts. Some KEY PROJECT i examples projects are highlighted. Miami Beach Convention Center (MBCC): E Sciences conducted a Phase I and II ESA for the MBCC in anticipation of substantial renovations.We determined that the area was historically used as a golf course and identified contamination.Through coordination with DERM, it was decided that engineering controls could be put into place within the renovated areas and that no assessment would be necessary for the on-site condition. Off site assessment was to be conducted after the renovations began but prior to their completion. Ms. Paituvi coordinated the day to day activities associated with the assessment. Miami Beach Golf Course Maintenance Facility(Green Waste Facility): This site is an undeveloped, bermed area located on the east side of the Miami Beach Golf Club.The site was previously used for solid waste landfilling and hurricane debris staging.The City of Miami Beach implemented a material screening plan to remove the buried solid waste. The recovered screened material (RSM)was used to construct a berm around the former landfilled area. Miami-Dade Department of Environmental Resource Management(DERM),currently known as Department of Regulatory and a. Economic Resources(RER),required the City to demonstrate that there was a minimum of two feet of clean fill or other engineering control in place covering areas of RSM in or around the berm in order pursue regulatory closure for the site.E Sciences developed and implemented a sampling plan. Upon review of the soil data collected,the City of Miami Beach elected to implement an engineering control (EC)to achieve conditional site closure.Ms. Paituvi has prepared an engineering control design and coordinated regulatory meetings to seek approval of this closure approach, and prepared a review of historical resources in order to identify the areas of concern to be addressed by the proposed EC. Ms. Paituvi has worked closely with the City to coordinate the installation of the EC. Ms. Paituvi oversaw that regulatory requirements were implemented during construction. E Sciences submitted as-built drawings and cross-sections documenting the constructed condition of the berm to RER. The EC implementation has been approved by RER. Miami Beach Groundwater Elevation and Sea Level Rise (SLR) Evaluation: E Sciences was engaged by the City of Miami Beach to evaluate areas within the beach in anticipation of SLR.The purpose of the study was to evaluate low-lying areas vulnerable to flooding and SLR within Miami Beach based on the assumption that the groundwater levels under the City are tidally influenced and therefore flooding.The E Sciences Team developed a Soil Capacity Model intended to help identify areas of potential short and long term flooding and areas where sea level rise is expected to reduce unsaturated soil storage capacity further. The results of this model were contoured to provide a spatial representation of flood prone areas. Ms. Paituvi provided technical oversight and prepared the final report for this project.Contract Budget/Fees:$888,858 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Brownfields Assessment and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Remediation Services,Henrietta Bridge Farm,Palm Beach County,Florida 2008—2014 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm KEY PROJECT i Through the Brownfields Grant, the TCRPC conducted Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) of the property located at 1400 Henrietta Avenue in West Palm Beach. This parcel was assessed in preparation for use as an urban garden.The site has been vacant for over a decade and was historically occupied by residential dwellings.This Phase I ESA revealed that numerous and varied historical activities in the vicinity of the Site commonly associated with contamination have occurred historically in close proximity to the Site.These facilities largely operated prior to the existence and enforcement of current environmental regulations and therefore the presence of contamination could have gone undetected. Historical facilities identified included lumber yards, dry cleaners, b. gasoline filling stations,auto repair shops,and railway maintenance facilities.A Phase II ESA was recommended to evaluate the possibility of contamination having migrated on to the Site from an off-site source. Furthermore, based on the proposed use of the Site as an urban garden, Phase II ESA activities included soil sampling and analysis to explore the possibility of undetected contaminants. Soil sampling was conducted using Incremental Sampling Methodology in order to collect a soil sample representative of site conditions.Groundwater sampling to evaluate the potential presence of groundwater impacts associated with potential migration of groundwater contamination from offsite sources. Groundwater sampling locations were selected based on the locations of the identified offsite facilities. Soil analytical results revealed the presence of Benzo(a)pyrenes (BaPs) above the FDEP Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs). BaPs are known anthropogenic contaminants commonly associated with the deposition of motor vehicle exhaust commonly encountered in urban areas. E Sciences assisted the City with obtaining a$200,000 Brownfields Cleanup grant and we are currently implementing the remediation. Fees for Master TCRPC Contract:$353,047;Project fees for TCRPC$47,702;Budget for City Contract:$180,000 Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-5 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Broward County Mass Transit Copans Road Facility, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Broward County,Florida 2007-Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm ----- 11 c KEY PROJECT This project started as a UST system upgrade project for 13 USTs with a combined total volume of 392,000 gallons of - petroleum product. Ms. Paituvi was part of the E Sciences team that completed tank assessment and source removal activities. She participated in the coordination and completion of field activities and contractor communication. Ms. Paituvi conducted data evaluation and the preparation of a Tank Closure Assessment Report and Source Removal Report that have received regulatory approval. She also collaborated in pursuing FDEP funding under the Limited Source Removal Initiative Program and compliance with the program. Project Budget/Fees:$210,421 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Truman Waterfront Park Soil Management Plan, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of Key West,Monroe County,Florida 2014-2016 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm E Sciences prepared a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan to be implemented during construction activities based on the documented presence of contamination impacts within the proposed development site. E Sciences' staff reviewed the contamination assessment and d remediation history of the proposed development parcels to ascertain and assist the City in understanding existing and proposed land use restrictions to determine the requirements for site development and use as a public park. The Soil and Groundwater Management Plan was developed to provide protocols and measures to handle contaminated media and to identify the engineering controls that would be required to be installed and maintained as part of the site development. This process involved coordination with the U.S. Navy and the FDEP to compile the necessary historical assessment information. Ms. Paituvi completed the document review and provided the communication bridge with the parties involved to convey the extensive information into the Soil and Groundwater Management Plan that was approved by FDEP and the U.S. Navy. Contract Budget/Fees:$22,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of North Miami Beach General Environmental Engineering Services- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Taylor Park,City of North Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2009-Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm ['KEY PROJECT 11, Among the services provided under this contract,E Sciences assisted on the assessment and environmental evaluation of Taylor Park — The property is an old abandoned dump site that is slated by the City of North Miami Beach for e redevelopment as a park. This project was riddled with complex issues, as it is was operated as a solid waste dump and was occupied by a ball field and an operational daycare facility. Ms. Paituvi collaborated on site monitoring activities and documentation, including soil and groundwater sampling .and conducted landfill gas monitoring in-situ and inside the on-site building structures. She also participated extensively in the preparation of a Remedial Technology Evaluation for this site,which considered the feasibility and cost efficiency of source removal, pump and treat, hydrologic barriers and the installation of a cap. She is now the engineer of record for the remediation being conducted under a separate contract with Miami-Dade County. Contract Budget/Fees:$145,701 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Brownfields Assessment and PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Remediation Services,West Palm Beach City Hall,Palm Beach County, 2008-2014 N/A Florida (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm LKEY PROJECT E Sciences conducted assessment and remediation services as part of an EPA Brownfield Assessment Grant.One project performed was West Palm Beach City Hall —The City of West Palm Beach relocated to a new location leaving the f former location as a prime redevelopment spot in downtown.The City obtained grant funding from the TCRPC Brownfields Coalition Grant to conduct site assessment and asbestos surveying activities.The historic property was home to multiple potential sources of contamination,as is common with older urban areas. Ms. Paituvi developed and implemented a Phase II ESA sampling scope to evaluate the potential presence of soil and groundwater contamination at this site.Based on the results of the Phase II ESA,it was soil contamination was identified at the site. Using a "weight of evidence" approach, E Sciences demonstrated to the FDEP that contamination at the site was a results of urban setting and not site-related. She prepared a Soil Management Plan to be implemented during development activities at the site as an alternative to remediation. FDEP approved of the SMP and no further assessment or remediation is required at the site at this time. Fees for Master TCRPC Contract:$353,047;Project Fees:$124,259 Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-6 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Scott G.Evanson, PG Project Manager +.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT raw 36.3 6.3 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) E Sciences,Incorporated,Orlando,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREEANDSPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(S TATE AND DISCIPLINE) Masters Business Administration Florida Professional Geologist#1459 BS,Geology 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) HAZWOPER 40 Hour;HAZWOPER 8 Hour Supervisor;Florida Brownfields Association 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Atlantic Housing,Lakewood Pointe, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Seffner,Florida 6/2013—8/2014 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm This facility was built on a historical construction debris dump. Project included oversite of deep dynamic compaction, a PROJECT monitoring of landfill generated gas and groundwater monitoring. Groundwater parameters included arsenic, benzo(a)pyrene,and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons.Mr.Evanson is the project manager for the Lakewood Pointe project.He also manages the Annual Director's Authorization Inspection Report for the permit to develop. This report includes data gathering and documentation on a historic solid waste disposal area, and inspections including certification that the facility and system of treatment, monitoring, control and related appurtenances were maintained, in good repair, and were properly functioning. Project Budget/Fees: $114,600 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Atlantic Housing Partners,Rolling Green, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sarasota,Florida Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm b. Mr. Evanson, as the senior geologist and project manager for the AHP projects, provides oversight on numerous Phase I KErPRo�Ec- and Phase II ESAs, landfill gas and groundwater monitoring at a Brownfield Site. For the Rolling Green property in Sarasota, Florida,services consisted of site assessment and interim source removal, both of which were approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under an expedited schedule in order to meet HUD requirements.Project Budget/Fees:$$187,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services—Seminole County Sports PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Complex,City of Sanford,Seminole County,Florida 2013—2014 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm c. KEY PROJECT; Mr. Evanson managed the project and conducted or provided oversite for field operations and was the quality assurance reviewer for several recent projects conducted in the City of Sanford for Seminole County. These projects included the Seminole County Sports Complex and the Five Points Complex. He also serves as the project manager for E Sciences' Seminole County General Environmental Services continuing contract.Project Budget/Fees:$65,000 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Orange County Fire Station#20 RAP, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Orange County,Florida 2011 —Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm d. Mr. Evanson serves as a task manager and technical reviewer for this contract. E Sciences was contracted by Orange County to implement and prepare the RAP. Tasks included site specific Health and Safety Plan; baseline sampling of the existing groundwater monitoring wells; abandonment of groundwater monitoring wells, not intended for future monitoring; installation of groundwater monitoring wells, ISCO injections and a multiple years of groundwater monitoring.Project Budget/Fees:$370,500 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Orange County Risk Management,Continuing Environmental Site Assessment PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) and Remediation,Orange County,Florida 2011—2013 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm e Mr. Evanson served as a task manager and technical reviewer for this term contract. Administrative services conducted have involved contract management, including responsibility for disadvantaged business utilization and reporting, and billing. His technical role involved management of field activities and report development. Mr. Evanson provided oversight of projects involving ISCO, source removal, landfill monitoring, and documentation of existing building components for inclusion in engineering and institutional control packages. These packages were eventually submitted to FDEP in order to obtain conditional site closures. Contract Budget/Fees:$645,820 Tab 2 Experience& Qualifications Page 2-7 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED FDEP Petroleum Pre-Approval Program Sites, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Various Locations,Florida 2004—2013 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Mr. Evanson provided project management and technical oversight under the pre-approval program for free product removal activities at the f former Isuzu site in Orlando, assessment and RAP implementation for a site in Seminole County and assessment at a facility in Palatka, Florida. Prior experience includes management of tank removal, site assessment and remediation activities at two sites at the Sanford Airport. Projects included the removal of Underground Storage Tanks,dewatering, excavation and disposal or land farming of contaminated soil. During the backfilling operations,oxygen release compound and microbes were introduced to clean fill that was placed below the water table. The groundwater treatment provided by this effort resulted in relatively short natural attenuation monitoring programs prior to site closures.Project Budget/Fees:$150.00 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Thomas Lumber PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Orlando,Florida 7/2015—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm 9 Mr. Evanson provided technical review for the Phase I and Phase II ESAs for this facility located near Downtown Orlando. Groundwater contamination,likely related to the presence of a historical UST,resulted in the filing of a discharge notification form with FDEP. Mr.Evanson also reviewed the SAR that involved installation and sampling of monitoring wells and testing of aquifer characteristics. Upon approval of the SAR by OCEPD, Mr. Evanson will review the Remedial Action Plan, where we will evaluate the remedial alternatives and costs. Project Budget/Fees:$37,500 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Seminole County,Florida 2004—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm h Mr. Evanson is the senior geologist on the several of the recent projects we have completed in Seminole County.These include Rolling Hills Golf Course, where he was the author of the Phase I ESA and primary preparer of the Phase II ESA proposal; and the Evolution Auto property where he did the site visit for the Phase I ESA. Mr. Evanson is the project manager for the Site Assessment Report E Sciences recently competed at the former Cumberland farms site in Casselberry and the Flaming Arrow Court Source removal in Fern Park. Contract Budget/Fees:$450,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Petroleum Assessment/Clean Up,Orlando Sanford International Airport, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sanford,Florida 2006 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Mr. Evanson managed tank removal,site assessment and remediation activities at two sites at the Sanford Airport. Site 3 was conducted as i the designated pre-approval petroleum clean-up contractor for the airport, while Building 117 was conducted as a voluntary clean-up site. Both projects included the removal of USTs, dewatering, excavation and disposal or landfarming of contaminated soil. During the backfilling operations, oxygen release compound and microbes were introduced to clean fill that was placed below the water table. The groundwater treatment provided by this effort resulted in relatively short natural attenuation monitoring programs prior to site closures. Project Budget/Fees:.$1,800,000 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Orlando,Environmental Assessment,Testing and Remediation, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Orlando,Florida 2010—2013 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Mr. Evanson served as technical reviewer for this term contract. Services provided under this contract consisted of Phase I ESAs, asbestos surveys and abatement,and review of documents related to the Orlando Manufactured Gas Plant.Contract Budget/Fees:$253,345 Tab 2 Experience& Qualifications Page 2-8 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Flormari Blackburn,PE Project Manager!Senior Engineer a TOTALWITH CURRENT FIRM 29.0 5.0 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) E Sciences,Incorporated,Orlando,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) BS,Chemical Engineering Professional Engineer-Civil&Environmental,FL,47738 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Professional Engineer-Civil& Environmental, PR, 14877; HAZWOPER 40 Hour; HAZWOPER 8 Hour Supervisor OSHA Confined Space Entry; Florida Brownfields Association 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pershing Area Remediation, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Orlando,Florida 6/2013—8/2014 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm a This project involved site assessment and preparation and implementation of an Interim Measures Work Plan for a chlorinated solvent contaminated site. Ms. Blackburn led our efforts to select a remedial contractor and then served as the engineer of record and managed field operations for the dewatering, excavation, soil load out and disposal and backfilling with clean soil and an amendment. In addition, she managed field operations during the In-Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) injections that were conducted into areas located adjacent to the excavated area to facilitate groundwater clean-up.Project Budget/Fees:$1,380,418 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Atlantic Housing,Lakewood Pointe, • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Seffner,Florida Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm This project included monitoring of landfill generated gas and groundwater monitoring. Groundwater parameters included b t KEY PROJECT arsenic, benzo(a)pyrene, and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons. Ms. Blackburn is the senior engineer for the project and the Engineer of Record for the Annual Director's Authorization Inspection Report. Her responsibilities include data gathering and documentation on a historic solid waste disposal area, and inspections including certification that the facility and system of treatment, monitoring, control and related appurtenances were maintained, in good repair, and were properly functioning. Project Budget/Fees: $114,600 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services—Seminole County Sports PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Complex,Seminole County,Florida 2013—2014 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm c. KEY PROJECT As part of the Seminole County General Environmental Services contract, Ms. Blackburn is the senior engineer for the Seminole County Sports Complex. Her role was to provide oversite on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs)and to assist with scope development and report preparation for the Phase II ESA tasks of these orange groves that were historically developed with celery fields. Minor soil impacts were identified and Ms. Blackburn provided oversite to the source removal (excavation and disposal)that was completed.Project Budget/Fees:$65,000 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Orange County Fire Station#20 Remedial Action Plan Implementation, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Orange County,Florida Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm d. Ms. Blackburn serves as the Engineer of Record for the remedial effort that includes ISCO injection over a large groundwater plume located in northwest Orange County. Ms. Blackburn is responsible for all technical aspects of the project including:developing a Site Specific Health and Safety Plan;selection of injection locations and ISCO concentrations,interactions with neighbors in the area and interested by standers, and quarterly groundwater monitoring.Project Budget/Fees:$370,500 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services—Seminole County Rolling PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Hills Golf Course,Seminole County,Florida 2016—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm KEY PROJECT Ms. Blackburn serves as the Engineer of Record for this project that started with the completion of a Phase I and Phase II PROJECT".i ESA. The assessment revealed that concentrations of arsenic and dieldrin in soils exceed the applicable soil cleanup e. target levels on areas of the golf course and maintenance building area. In addition,dieldrin was identified in the maintenance building area groundwater. Sampling of the surface water and sediments in the golf course ponds did not identify concentrations of arsenic or dieldrin in excess of applicable standards. The proposed remedial strategy is to mitigate human health-based risks associated with the direct exposure to vadose zone arsenic and/or dieldrin contaminated soil.Remediation will be completed in accordance with FAC Chapter 62-780.680 for No Further Action with Controls under Risk Management Option Level II. The areas of soil impacts will be rehabilitated by a combination of remedial approaches such as excavation/disposal and engineering controls including soil mixing,planters, limited access areas, parking lots and covering area with clean fill.Project Budget/Fees:$101,000 Tab 2 Experience& Qualifications Page 2-9 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Seminole County,Florida 2004—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm f Ms. Blackburn is the senior engineer on the several of the recent projects we have completed in Seminole County. These include Rolling Hills Golf Course,where she was a reviewer of the Phase I ESA and primary preparer of the Phase II ESA proposal;and the Evolution Auto property where she again was the primary author of the Phase I ESA. Ms. Blackburn is the Engineer of Record for the Site Assessment Report E Sciences recently competed at the former Cumberland Farms site in Casselberry and the Flaming Arrow Court Source removal in Fern Park. Contract Budget/Fees:$450,000 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Orange County Risk Assessment Continuing PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Services Contract,Orange County,Florida 2010—2013 N/A 9 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm For the Orange County Fleet Services task, Ms. Blackburn was the Engineer of Record for the Engineering Control Documents for a No Further Action with conditions remedial strategy. Responsibilities included certifying that the engineering controls were adequate in order to effectively cover the previously identified areas of soil contamination located beneath the building slab. Contract Budget/Fees:$645,820 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Thomas Lumber PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Orlando,Florida 7/2015—Ongoing N/A • (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Ms. Blackburn conducted the Phase I and Phase II ESAs for this facility located near Downtown Orlando. Groundwater contamination, likely h. related to the presence of a historical underground storage tank (UST) resulted in the filing of a discharge notification form with Orange County Environmental Protection Division (OCEPD). Ms. Blackburn also managed the site assessment that involved installation and sampling of monitoring wells and testing of aquifer characteristics. Upon approval of the site assessment by OCEPD, Ms. Blackburn will be the primary author the Remedial Action Plan(RAP),where we will evaluate the remedial alternatives and costs associated with site clean-up. Project Budget/Fees:$37,500 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Casselberry City Center, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of Casselberry,Florida 2011—2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ID Check if project performed with current firm Ms. Blackburn was project manager for a site assessment(petroleum spill)at the City of Casselberry's City Center. The scope of services was conducted in conjunction with the City's Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Brownfield Site Assessment Grant. The portion of the City Center area was the location of a former service station.Groundwater and soil contamination was delineated at the site.The City Center site is located within designated brownfield area.Project Budget/Fees:$450,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Casselberry Police Department, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of Casselberry,Florida 2011—2012 N/A j. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Ms. Blackburn was project manager for a site assessment (petroleum spill) at the City of Casselberry's Police Department. The scope of services was conducted in conjunction with the City's EPAs Brownfield Site Assessment Grant. Project Budget/Fees:$50,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED GEO Group,Various Locations,United States, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Various Locations,Florida 2000—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Bnef scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm k. Ms. Blackburn was project and client manager for services throughout the United States,including: Environmental Assessment, Phase I and Phase II ESAs, remediation, National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)compliance for the Bureau of Prisons, property condition surveys, asbestos surveys, and radon assessments. Locations included Aurora, Colorado; Hinton, Oklahoma; Ballwin, Michigan; Pecos, Texas; Jamaica, New York; Lovejoy, Georgia; Jena, Louisiana; McFarland, California; Adelanto, California; Tacoma, Washington; Hobbs, New Mexico;and Hudson,Colorado.Project Budget/Fees:$75,000 Annually 1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 2)YEAR COMPLETED Orlando-Sanford Airport Building 117 Site Assessment, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sanford,Florida 2005 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Ms. Blackburn was project manager for the Orlando-Sanford Airport Building 117 Site Assessment and RAP for Soil and Groundwater Contamination(bioremediation,landfarming).Project Budget/Fees:$100,000 Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-10 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jennifer Marie Savaro Staff Scientist &TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 5.7 2.7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) E Sciences,Incorporated 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) MS,Marine Biology and Coastal Zone Management N/A BS, Marine Science,Marine Biology/Environmental Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) American Academy of Underwater Sciences Scientific Diver; NAUI Dive Master; ISA Certified Arborist; FWC Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent and OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Homestead Professional Services Agreement—Continuing PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Professional Services,City of Homestead,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2014—Ongoing N/A a (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm E Sciences is providing environmental permitting support services for the City of Homestead. Unauthorized wetland filling occurred within a City-owned parcel. Ms. Savaro assists with the coordination with agencies and preparing permit applications for Miami-Dade County RER, SFWMD,and USACE. Contract Budget/Fees:$19,005 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ruck's Park/Former Pioneer Gardens, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of North Miami,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2014—2016 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm E Sciences is assisting the City of North Miami with on-going assessment and related activities for the Former Ruck's b KEY PROJECT ,- =- Park/Pioneer Gardens property. Soil and groundwater contamination was previously identified in numerous sample locations. E Sciences submitted a sampling plan to establish the groundwater conditions at the property boundary to develop a remedial strategy that would be coordinated with site redevelopment. Ms. Savaro conducted monitoring well installation oversight and conducted groundwater sampling. Contract Budget/Fees:$69,622 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Taylor Park, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of North Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2010 N/A c (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm KEY PROJECT,i E Sciences is providing design criteria professional services associated with the remediation of Taylor Park. This included I conducting site visits to locate and document the integrity of each monitoring well and methane probe, as well as conduct methane and groundwater sampling actives.Ms. Savaro assisted with groundwater sampling activities.Project Budget/Fees:$145,701 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2011—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Miami Beach Golf Course: E Sciences provided additional surface water sampling activities associated with the process KEY PROJECT" of pursuing regulatory closure of the site at Miami Beach Golf Course. Ms. Savaro conducted four irrigation water sampling events. Miami Beach Fleet Management Facility: E Sciences provided assessment activities associated with interim groundwater monitoring associated with a historic petroleum leak from an underground storage tank. A discharge associated with the presence of synthetic oil was discovered based on the presence of free floating product in an onsite monitoring well.groundwater monitoring events were d. conducted quarterly. Ms. Savaro conducted groundwater monitoring and free product removal. City of Miami Beach Tree Inventory, Phase and 4: E Sciences provided tree inventory services for the City. Ms. Savaro performed GPS data collection, tree assessment and measurement and maintenance recommendations. Emergency Surface Water Bacteria Sampling: E Sciences was responsible for collecting surface water quality samples for bacteriological testing on an emergency basis for the City.This sampling was necessary to due to a sewer line break. Ms. Savaro coordinated with the City and collected the surface water samples. 81st Street Kayak Launch: E Sciences is providing permitting support for 81st Street Kayak Launch project in the City. Ms. Savaro assisted with the benthic survey and preparing the Natural Resources Assessment Report and permit applications. Parkview Island Park Kayak Launch: E Sciences provided permitting support for this kayak launch project. Ms. Savaro conducted a seagrass survey and assisted with permitting for this area. Contract Budget/Fees:S888,858 Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-11 E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Joshua L.Stocker Staff Scientist a TOTAL e.wmuw+cunaeirtc 3.3 2.7 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) E Sciences,Incorporated 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) M.S.,Marine Environmental Science and Coastal Zone Management N/A B.S.,Biology and Environmental Science 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) PADI Open Water,Advance,Enriched Air(EANX),and Rescue Diver Certified;AAUS diver;OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2011 —Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm KEYPROJECT I Miami Beach Fleet Management Facility: E Sciences provided assessment activities associated with interim a. I groundwater monitoring associated with a historic petroleum leak from an underground storage tank. A discharge associated with the presence of synthetic oil was discovered based on the presence of free floating product in an onsite monitoring well. groundwater monitoring events were conducted quarterly. Mr. Stocker assisted with the groundwater monitoring. Normandy Shores Groundwater Monitoring: E Sciences conducted groundwater monitoring to support a monitoring only plan implemented at the site for the presence of arsenic impacts at an active golf course in the City. Mr.Stocker conducted the groundwater sampling activities and assisted with the quarterly reports. Contract Budget/Fees:$888,858 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Ruck's Park, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of North Miami,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2014—2016 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm b KEY PROJECT; E Sciences is assisting the City of North Miami with ongoing assessment and related activities for the Former Ruck's Parks property. Soil and groundwater contamination was previously identified in numerous sample locations by others. E Sciences submitted a sampling plan to establish the groundwater conditions throughout the property to develop a remedial strategy that would be coordinated with site redevelopment. Mr. Stocker's role was to oversee monitoring well installation, conduct groundwater well and soil sampling,and assist with report preparation.Contract Budget/Fees:$69,622 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pompano Beach CRA Continuing Contract for Environmental Engineering PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Services,City of Pompano Beach,Broward County,Florida 2010—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Palm Aire Country Club: E Sciences conducted a Phase I Environmental Site c. Assessment for a country club including a former golf course and lakes for the City of Pompano Beach. Mr. Stocker conducted the Phase I Assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Pompano Beach Woman's Club Property: E Sciences conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Pompano Beach Woman's Club Property. Mr. Stocker conducted the Phase I Assessment. Contract Budget/Fees:$161,719 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Miscellaneous Environmental Engineering Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of Miami,Florida 2017—Ongoing N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ®Check if project performed with current firm Grapeland Park Site Assessment Activities: E Sciences conducted monitoring well installation, soil sampling, and groundwater monitoring activities to support site assessment efforts at the park. The assessment data will be used to support conditional closure of the site for the d City. Mr. Stocker assisted with monitoring well installation activities and conducted the soil sampling and groundwater monitoring activities. Douglas Park Well Installation and Sampling: E Sciences conducted groundwater monitoring well installation and monitoring activities to support the site assessment efforts at this park. The assessment data will be used to support conditional closure of the site for the City. Mr. Stocker conducted the groundwater monitoring activities. Engineering Control Inspections: E Sciences is conducting quarterly inspections of installed Engineering Controls in eleven city parks to observe the conditions and integrity in accordance with the Engineering Control Maintenance Plans. Mr.Stocker conducted the Engineering Control inspections and assisted with the Engineering Control Inspection Reports for submittal to Miami-Dade County DERM. Contract Budget/Fees:$127,661 Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-12 20 EXAMPLE PRC.EC"•E''IU1dBER F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2011 —Ongoing N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Margarita Wells 305-673-7000 x 6928 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) E Sciences was awarded a contract with the City of Miami Beach to conduct environmental engineering services.To date,E Sciences has provided the City with consulting services including the following: Properties Adjacent to Miami Beach Convention Center:In preparation for redevelopment of City owned properties to enhance the convention center area, E Sciences conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)for land parcels adjacent to the Miami Beach Convention Center.These parcels included a parking lot west of the convention center,the 21st Street Community Center and Bandshell north of the convention center and the Fillmore theatre.The Phase I ESA revealed the historic operation of a golf course on the project sites.This finding was identified as a recognized environmental condition(REC)based on the potential historical application of herbicides and pesticides on the ground.A Phase II ESA was conducted by E Sciences to evaluate the potential presence of soil and groundwater impacts based on the historical use of the sites. Incremental Sampling Methodology (ISM) was selected as the soil sampling approach. ISM results were indicative of the presence of arsenic concentrations above approved naturally occurring concentration criteria specific for Miami Beach. Limited groundwater impacts were detected in one area.E Sciences assisted the City in evaluating a viable development approach to address the onsite impacts.Upon coordination with Miami-Dade County RER Department, the City has elected to implement a combination of • , , • =x t = _ `' +�' engineering controls and source removal efforts as part of the development plan for the sites.Off- site assessment activities have been deferred to a later date. E Sciences documents were included as part of the bidding documents to provide guidance to the development contractor. Proposed Miami Beach Convention Center Headquarter Hotel:E Sciences conducted a limited site assessment for a site including a portion of the Fillmore Theater and parking areas adjacent to the Convention Center.This assessment was conducted based on the former presence of a golf course discovered during a Phase I ESAs conducted by E Sciences for adjacent properties.The assessment included soil and groundwater sampling and confirmed the presence of localized soil arsenic impacts and the presence of nitrate concentrations above groundwater cleanup criteria at the site.The City indicated that they would address these discoveries during development planning and implementation at a future time. Sea Level Rise Evaluation: E Sciences conducted a study of groundwater elevations,tidal fluctuations and . • r! rainfall over a period of twelve months to assist the City with evaluating the effects of sea level rise.To identify y areas of potential short and long term flooding, E Sciences created GIS layers of surface water levels from r w��w ' high quality LiDAR data,groundwater levels collected from designated monitoring wells, and other research = conducted. The critical component of the effort was to identify areas with limited soil storage capacity and 4• . a1 areas where sea level rise is expected to further reduce unsaturated soil storage capacity.These data were •:x� ` • o ,s• contoured to provide a spatialpresentation of areas with higher vulnerabilityfor impacts due to sea level rise. ='�'r -. ' P 9 p A report outlining our methodology, the results of the study in narrative, charts and graphics, and -_ •: 1,. recommendations was provided at the completion of the study. t t E Sciences also the City of Miami Beach with the completion of a groundwater elevation monitoring study in the Sunset Harbor neighborhood to support the design and installation of a stormwater management system.E Sciences provided the City with training and support during installation of the equipment and data collection,data management and modeling efforts. Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure(SPCC)Plans:E Sciences prepared SPCC Plans for 12 facilities located throughout Miami Beach. These facilities included pump stations,fire stations,public works yard,Miami Beach Golf Club and the Convention Center.E Sciences'approach for developing the SPCC Plan(s)followed the steps outlined in applicable federal regulations(40 CFR 112).The Plans were reviewed and certified by an E Sciences Professional Engineer.We also incorporated provisions to assist the City with compliance with state and local regulations.We conducted the following activities to obtain the information required to complete the Tier I SPCC Plans: • Review available as-built drawings,surveys and plans related to the structures and drainage pathways • Conduct a site visit of each facility with a person knowledgeable of the facility's tank systems,coordinated through the City's Environmental Department • Interview the site manager or other personnel familiar with the tank systems and other oil storage systems Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-13 • Review records of previous spills • Evaluate topography and surface water flow regimes • Evaluate areas of obvious discharge potential and spill sources • Identify environmentally sensitive areas and potential receptors if a spill were to occur • Document security measures to prevent unauthorized access to oil handling • Develop a list of emergency response personnel • Review the City's spill response measures • Review records of tank integrity and pressure tests • Review the City's personnel training records Green Waste Facility:This site was an undeveloped,bermed area located on the east side of the Miami Beach Golf Club.The site was previously used by the City of Miami Beach for solid waste management,and a portion of the area contained buried debris.In anticipation of constructing a wastewater reclamation facility,the City implemented a material screening plan to remove the buried solid waste and screen out the larger(greater than 2-inches) pieces of solid waste for off-site disposal.The recovered screened material(RSM)was merged with a berm around the solid waste handling area to separate it from adjacent properties and the golf course.The larger pieces of debris removed consisted primarily of rock,concrete and wood. Miami- Dade Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM) (currently Regulatory and Economic Resources - RER) required the City to demonstrate that there was a minimum of two feet of clean fill or other engineering control in place covering areas of solid waste in or around the berm in order to pursue regulatory closure for the site. E Sciences conducted environmental services to evaluate the top two feet of soil layer covering the berm.In order to complete the project in a time and cost effective manner,E Sciences developed a phased sampling approach by collecting the necessary samples,but conducting laboratory analysis on an iterative basis.The initial sampling results revealed the presence of regulated contaminants above regulatory criteria,therefore additional analysis was not deemed necessary.The City elected to implement an engineering control(EC)to achieve conditional site closure along with the adjacent golf course property,protecting human health and the environment.E Sciences prepared an EC design and provided oversight and regulatory coordination for the installation of the EC.The design and installation of the EC received regulatory approval,and E Sciences assisted with drafting the restrictive covenant to be used for the final conditional closure. Fleet Management Facility: E Sciences conducted groundwater and soil assessment activities at the active City's fleet management facility. The assessment was completed in order to evaluate the presence of contamination associated with a historical petroleum discharge documented in 1992. This assessment revealed the presence of free floating product in the groundwater and soil impacts within a localized area at the facility.E Sciences prepared and submitted a Site Assessment Report Addendum including source removal plan recommendations.The SARA and source removal plan has received regulatory approval from RER.E Sciences has recently prepared a Monitoring Only Plan(MOP)as part of a Consent Agreement between RER and the City to maintain certain environmental provisions on the site while waiting to implemented cleanup and remediation efforts during the anticipated development of the property. The MOP was approved by RER, and E Sciences is conducting groundwater monitoring in lieu of active remediation. Street Tree Inventory: E Sciences conducted street tree inventories for the Normandy Shores and Normandy Isles neighborhoods. A total of 6,010 trees were - ;; :- inventoried using sub-meter accurate global positioning equipment. E Sciences ^^�..a....4 provided the City with an ESRI ArcGIS shape file.The work included assessing each tree for its general condition and providing recommendations for maintenance. mo® Ana' — HEBEI Mt .r.•v ===.7-="4: r�YK�sw�r� Greenspace Canopy Assessment: Using i-Tree Canopy and i-Tree Vue, ®® E Sciences assessed the extent of the City's urban forest canopy and the ecological :A:las q�_.1MIrruYr services provided by the trees. E Sciences estimated the canopy coverage for the • gim® City's entire urban forest, its parks and its rights of way using i-Tree Canopy. It also EERIE ^=r«...r... '` estimated the percentage of available space remaining within the City for additional - = tree planting. E Sciences used this information to estimate the carbon sequestration 0®- and storage, as well as pollutant removal being provided by the trees. E Sciences ®�- — • developed a brochure for public education documenting the information from the ®® - I -scum.. study. ®® Contract Budget/Fees: $888,858. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale&Miami, Florida Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-14 20 EXAMPLE PRO,ECT tEY NUMBER F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 2 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Taylor Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of North Miami Beach,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2010 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of North Miami Beach Mr.Karim Rossy (305)354-4441 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost.) E Sciences maintains a continuing services contract with the City of North Miami Beach to conduct environmental engineering services on an as-needed basis.One of the projects that we provided environmental consulting on is the Taylor Park project. Taylor Park has been slated for redevelopment since 1999, when the FDEP had their • contractor conduct a Brownfields Assessment of the site. The assessment revealed metals i . and petroleum in the soil and metals in the groundwater. In 2005, assessment activities revealed the presence of buried solid waste and landfill gas generation on most of the 21.8- _ acre property.YFor many Years,environmental issues continued to restrict and complicate ; t'�i w!IMO redevelopment efforts for the property.The property was occupied at that time by an inactive —-- -• ball field,an operating daycare facility,vacant land and a lake. - 41111111 E Sciences was contracted in 2009 by the City to move the assessment, cleanup and redevelopment of the property forward. As a team, E Sciences, the City, and Akerman - Senterfitt developed a comprehensive approach to coordinating management of the - � • environmental issues at the site with the redevelopment of the property as a community park.Our approach involved the following: • Working with Miami-Dade Fire Rescue and the daycare staff to manage the potential methane issues at the property; • Seeking community input(we have already conducted two meetings with interested residents); • Integrating the remedial approach to the master planning process; • Identifying opportunities for ecological enhancements for the property and water quality improvement for the lake; • Working with the City to assist in submitting an application for Brownfields Grant for Remediation. Innovative techniques employed included conducting risk assessment of arsenic impacted areas to the satisfaction of the regulatory agency and geophysical surveys to identify the extent of buried solid waste and evaluate areas with higher concentrations of contaminants to plan for possible source removals.Remediation remedies selected include the following: • Source removal; • Continuous methane monitoring within the structures on-site; • Installation of surface cap to prevent infiltration of stormwater and exposure to buried materials; • Quarterly landfill gas monitoring at site perimeter and interior of buildings; • Quarterly groundwater monitoring. E Sciences submitted the assessment and conceptual remedial design to the Department of Environmental Management and received approval in 2011. Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-15 The City ceased performing additional assessment and remedial actions due to funding limitations.The Miami-Dade County Department of Solid Waste Management(DSWM)has since assumed responsibility for assessment and remediation of the Site.The City and the County are working together to complete the assessment and remediation are in order to accommodate the planned redevelopment of the park to be conducted by the City.The Site was accepted into Florida's Brownfields Program through execution of a BSRA on December 16,2015. DSWM engaged E Sciences in 2015 finalize the assessment and implement the remediation of the site. E Sciences submitted a SARA on February 26, 2016 documenting updated groundwater analytical data collected at the Site. The SARA was approved by FDEP without regulatory comments in March 2016. Based on the planned redevelopment of the Site, E Sciences prepared a Remedial Action Plan(RAP) proposing excavation of buried debris along the site boundary,excavation of arsenic impacted soil within the ballfield area and installation of an engineering control across the footprint of the buried debris.These corrective actions were selected to deem the site suitable for the park development while implementing the necessary precautions to ensure the health and safety of the public. The RAP was approved by FDEP without comment in July 2016.E Sciences prepared the construction bid plans outlining the technical details of the proposed excavation and engineering control cover and assisted DSWM in the bid development and response to questions.As part of our scope,we developed an Air Monitoring Plan to be implemented during construction activities to control and mitigate dust emissions and potential subsurface methane migration.The selected bidder is recently secured the required permits for construction. E Sciences will continue to provide environmental support during construction,including air monitoring and field documentation of the remedial activities. Our involvement with the project will continue through the submittal of a Remedial Action Completion Report, inclusive of as built plans. Contract Budget/Fees:$145,701 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale&Miami,Florida Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-16 20 E AMPLE PROJECT NE'PIUNEi- F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services—Seminole County PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Rolling Hills Golf Course,Seminole County,Florida 2016—Ongoing N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER ' b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Seminole County Richard E. Durr,Jr.,CPRP,PLA,AICP (407)665-2173 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost.) E Sciences is currently on a second term contract for Seminole County to provide environmental assessment, remediation and Brownfield consulting. E Sciences has also completed tasks involving erosion control inspections of County construction projects on an as-needed basis, as well as Erosion and Sediment Control training to County staff. Rolling Hills Golf Course,Oviedo,Florida The Rolling Hills Golf Course located in Oviedo Florida (Site) operated for nearing 100 years prior to closing in 2014. On behalf of Seminole County Leisure Services Department, E Sciences conducted Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, completed a Site Assessment Report and prepared a Remedial Action Plan with an Opinion of Probable Remedial Costs in order to quantify the financial burden the County may assume in a proposed purchase of the Site. Tasks completed included soil, sediment and groundwater sampling of the golf course and the maintenance areas,preparation of reports for review by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(FDEP)review and response to FDEP comments. E Sciences proposed the use of alternative soil clean up target levels (SCTLs) that were approved by FDEP subject to an institutional control. In order to meet these alternative SCTLs, remedial measures such as excavation and disposal, soil mixing and installation of engineering controls were proposed. Dieldrin groundwater impacts were noted in the maintenance area. The horizontal and vertical extent of these impacts has been delineated and In-situ Chemical Oxidation was selected as the remedial approach. E Sciences worked with our remedial subcontractors to develop the Opinion of Probable Remedial Costs to address the contamination issues identified at the Site. this opinion of cost is currently in use by the County in their protracted purchase contract negotiations with the current owner of the Rolling Hills Golf Course Site. Project Budget/Fees:$101,000 .': ,T _ / r ` Ver. • ti j S *w } f at • • 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a' E Sciences,Incorporated Orlando, Florida Prime Consultant b (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale,Florida Support to Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-17 20 EXAMPLE PRO.£CT KEY\'LACER F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 4 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Brownfield Assessment and Remediation Contract—West Palm Beach PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City Hall,City of West Palm Beach,Treasure Coast Regional Planning 2008—2014 N/A Council,Palm Beach,Florida 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Stephanie Heidt 772.221.4060 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost.) E Sciences provided environmental consulting services in support of the implementation of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's (TCRPC's) Brownfields assessment and remediation grants. In this role, E Sciences conducted Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), site assessments, remediation planning and regulatory negotiations. We also provided the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)required reporting to comply with grant provisions. Former West Palm Beach City Hall West Palm Beach's abandoned City Hall was identified as the CRA's prime site for redevelopment. It is the City's vision to bid the project to be redeveloped as an urban,waterfront hotel. E Sciences was requested to assess the environmental condition of the site as they prepare for the bidding process. Our services began with a Phase I ESA and we identified numerous historical land activities that could result in contaminated soil and groundwater. Historical land uses included automotive repair facilities with USTs,laundry facilities, railroad spurs and industrial/manufacturing activities.Using geophysical surveys and overlays of historical land uses onto current aerial photos,we identified our soil and groundwater sampling locations.Following preparation of a Site Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan(QAPP),we implemented a Phase II ESA and then a Florida Department FDEP rule-compliant Site Assessment Report(SAR).We did not identify groundwater impacts,but soil impacts were detected. 4/11f)! t t ( f The soil impacts are surficial, beneath the parking lot and we demonstrated that they are a result of the weathering of 30 years of asphalt covering, not from a discharge. Following the SAR,we prepared an Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives. 711 Historically,there has been no vehicle for the regulated community to use reasonable f1111I:7 jjl judgment to justify a No Further Action when contaminants are detected on a site but _ when there is no source of contamination identified.On this project,we are utilizing the FDEP's new guidance that allows for us to utilize a"weight of evidence"demonstration fi I lig' t )`' that detected parameters are not site-related and do not require remediation.Using the � rationale in this document,we negotiated with FDEP that in lieu of remediation during site development, soils disturbed and disposed are managed properly under a soil management plan.This will allow redevelopment of the former City Hall property and save about$1M in unnecessary remediation costs.This project was featured by the EPA and TCRPC during a trolley tour at the 16th Annual Florida Brownfields Association conference. Concurrent with the assessment activities,E Sciences prepared another Site-specific QAPP for conducting an asbestos survey.A QAPP for asbestos is unique because it is not really addressed in the Generic QAPP.The EPA project officer indicated that was required only because it was a large asbestos survey.Following EPA approval,our subconsultant conducted a full pre-demolition asbestos survey. During the asbestos survey,a material mined in Canada associated with asbestos mines(but not asbestos)was identified during review of building plans.This material was similar to vermiculite and was used to fill the holes in the concrete blocks in the walls.We proposed a new sampling protocol with FDEP that was accepted to minimize the number of samples required to be representative of the materials and to keep the material from flowing out of the walls,potentially causing a pathway for the material to enter the environment. Fees for Master TCRPC Contract: $353,047;Project Fees: $124,259 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a' E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale,Florida Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-18 20 EXAMPLE PROJECT KE"'UAIB_?. F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 5 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Brownfield Assessment and Remediation Contract-Henrietta Bridge PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Farm,City of West Palm Beach,Treasure Coast Regional Planning 2008-2014 N/A Council,Palm Beach,Florida 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Stephanie Heidt 772.221.4060 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost.) E Sciences provided environmental consulting services in support of the implementation of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Brownfields assessment and remediation grants. In this role,E Sciences conducted Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), site assessments, remediation planning and regulatory negotiations. We also provided the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency required reporting to comply with grant provisions.The following highlights some project examples that we completed under this contract. Henrietta Bridge Farm E Sciences conducted Phase I and Phase II ESAs for this property in preparation for use as an urban garden.The site has been vacant for over a decade and was historically occupied by residential dwellings. The urban farm will provide access to fruit and vegetables to the surrounding community. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) L • 2010 Census, Coleman Park and surrounding neighborhoods are considered a food desert. USDA defines a food desert as low-income census tracts with a substantial number or share of residents with low levels of access to retail outlets selling healthy and affordable foods. - yen1 This Phase I ESA revealed that numerous and varied historical activities ..-- 4/ill"'•'+,► :* "' l �ffr - in the vicinity of the Site commonly associated with contamination have ld�� , J_ . occurred in close proximity to the Site. These facilities largely operated prior to the existence and enforcement of current environmental _ - • "• j regulations and therefore the presence of contamination could have gone T - . undetected. Historical facilities identified included lumber yards, dry cleaners,gasoline stations,auto repair shops,and railway maintenance • facilities. Based on the proposed use of the Site as an urban garden, ;' • Phase II ESA activities included soil sampling and analysis to explore the . '' x . possibility of undetected contaminants. Incremental sampling methodology was used to provide a better statistical evaluation of potential exposure to soils in a garden setting. • rlrv+.e Aar++L ...�...±.�..`�—:{ �!--�cam• - �w.'M. ,Y' Following completion of the project and after the grant was closed, -7- al 1 p E Sciences assisted the City of West Palm Beach,(the site owner)with obtaining a $200,000 Brownfields Cleanup Grant. We are currently �`S cWY �,,,A• tA assistingthe Citywith implementing the cleanupof this propertyso that it is suitable for in ground planting at the farm. Ur b.,Growers C'oa+r.l•�F40,1 i leu C�r'r hAN Fees for Master TCRPC Contract:$353,047;Project fees for TCRPC $47,702; Budget for City Contract:$180,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a' E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale,Florida Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-19 20 EXAMPLE 0ROJE2T,(Er NUMBER F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 6 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Seminole County General Environmental Services—Seminole County PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sports Complex,Seminole County,Florida 2013—2014 NIA 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Seminole County Robert Walter,PE (407)665-5753 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost.) E Sciences is currently on a second term contract with Seminole County to provide environmental assessment,remediation and Brownfield consulting. E Sciences has also completed tasks involving erosion control inspections ,. "f 7' 'lw-; of County construction projects on an as-needed basis, as well as Erosion and Sediment Control training to County staff. . - , Seminole County Sports Complex '. " `''�` - •The Seminole County Sports Complex in Sanford Florida opened in 2016 :"`, * '..-'q z I on 102 acres located adjacent to the south of the Orlando/Sanford "�'•? International Airport. The new facility includes 15 baseball fields and L ..� .moi ;. _ ;- associated amenities. E Sciences conducted Phase I and Phase II ;4«:?-: ti., ` ., Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs)for Seminole County prior to the ..- purchase of the several tracts of land that were combined to create the y r:- project. Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified in . association with existing and historic agriculture operations centers and .. _ BEFORE equipment storage areas on the site. In addition, due to the planned site . -- fes__ -•:, use, historical agriculture operations were also a source of environmental Wit_ _ )', , ').,--- concern. �� concern. The Phase II ESAs consisted of soil sampling, monitoring well _ :yi" " ,. r installation and sampling, data tabulation and analysis, and report writing. � ,, � Soil sampling and monitoring well locations were designed to evaluate the • , identified RECs and concerns related to the existing orange grove '� . operations and the historic use of the area celery farming in the early 1900s. � •�'S- '-= r-- Several areas of shallow soil arsenic impacts were identified and delineated `, for future excavation and proper disposal by the construction contractor. /: One area of dieldrin impacted soil was identified.E Sciences delineated this .,. " , t area and implemented an Interim Source Removal to excavate and properly P ;, AFTER dispose of the soil.No groundwater impacts were identified at the Site. Project Budget/Fees: $65,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. E Sciences,Incorporated Orlando,Florida Prime Consultant b (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE E Sciences,Incorporated DeLand,Florida Support to Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-20 20 EXAMPLE'ROJEOT KEY NIACER F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 7 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects.if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Broward County Mass Transit Copans Road Facility, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Broward County,Florida 2007—2015 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Broward County Transit Department Cindy Corbett-Elder (954)357-8451 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size.and cost.) E Sciences began this project as an underground storage tank(UST)system upgrade project for 13 USTs with a combined total volume of 392,000 . gallons. This was the largest storage tank upgrade conducted in the State l, •}- P,.' . of Florida ,,, . .ik .:s..:,4: •:. 7 E Sciences' role was to provide assistance with developing the .• environmental portions of the contract documents for the construction project and to conduct the storage tank closure assessment and reporting . - ' activities. E Sciences also identified and secured$50,000 in state funding - rt 1 for the project. t s‘. IL 1 ,,i:- 4, E Sciences'responsibility grew to include conducting a baseline assessment ' ,-r —' N'` of the groundwater contaminant concentrations. The baseline assessment 4 11. was designed to provide justification for state funding for residual petroleum 1 = . .1'1.1 pr • impacts around the USTs and to aid in planning the management of i i impacted soil and groundwater during the UST replacement.While working a. 'i' 1 on the baseline assessment,a fuel delivery resulted in an off-site diesel fuel .?�11.... '�� discharge. E Sciences provided Broward County with guidance on how to q•abate the source, reduce their third party liability, and assisted with i•. • • . .. negotiating an off-site access agreement. E Sciences then conducted a s = .. ,--!~:'�`==_ limited contamination assessment to satisfy the regulatory requirements and ;.^Z t:.,9 ., t • "_`. } �" received no further action on this discharge. i"0"" 1 '. l - 1 . 1. •raa�,...s.d r ^R. Dieldrin and petroleum impacts identified during the tank removal required _ , follow upassessment activities.E Sciences has completed site assessment �-- -_ Broward County P iik4„.* _ Mass Transit Facility xm,.,,,, activities for pesticide and petroleum impacts. The assessments were t I'-'.' ,.:7;-:=17:.....--. .—. C. '0 3 accepted by the State and E Sciences negotiated conditional closure of all p""`"""a"�'"�`”'n residual impacts at the site. Project BudgetlFees: $210,421 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale, Florida Prime Consultant (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-21 20 E2At,PLE PROJECT tE"WISER F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 8 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Lakewood Pointe PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Seffner,Hillsborough County,Florida 2008-Ongoing N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Atlantic Housing Partners,LLLP Marc Gauthier,PE (407)741-8514 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(include scope,size,and cost) This designated Brownfield site was converted from an abandoned landfill to an affordable housing community. , E Sciences facilitated the Brownfields designation process by • •r m--"4,4",.-•s •• .. presenting at a neighborhood public meeting and representing .- •4..,-, ,1, -+ , . the owner at a City Commission meeting. E Sciences - .;=;r r• + - ' ( $ ' completed a Site Assessment Report and Remedial Action _ '� Ip _. Plan to address petroleum and arsenic soil and groundwater .• ''` t impacts. Engineering and Institutional Controls were ''=....., . ... �;_: ; implemented to allow the affordable housing project to be ,r e)...1 .' Y I Li completed while maintaining residential safeguards ands. :--' +04." I ,�• - -- ecologically sensitive lands. Site construction was completed ;?. ' . ' on June 30, 2010 and we are very close to completing the .. '4 • i1 • obligations of on-going methane and groundwater monitoring to close the project. 1. p.. ' '. . 11;i- .. - During this project, we excavated solid waste, screened out the large concrete pieces, crushed them into the size of#57 .i. �' i'ii i`` ' >,4 stone and used that material for backfill material for trenches - _ is associated with utilities and the methane venting system.This `-1: ,-; 7' r . saved costs that would have been incurred disposing of the y concrete and in purchasing new virgin stone. Additionally, a technique referred to as "deep dynamic compaction" was used to consolidate the buried debris so that it was more compacted while in place.This improved the stability of the sub-surface so that facilities constructed on top of the solid waste areas would not settle, and also reduced the pore space volume thereby decreasing the surface area interaction between the groundwater and the solid waste, reducing solubility of contamination into the groundwater. Project Budget/Fees:$114,600 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a E Sciences,Incorporated Orlando,Florida Prime Consultant (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b' E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale,Florida Support to Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience& Qualifications Page 2-22 20 EXA MP'.E PR O..E C' E Y\1.1,13=E F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. �/ Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED General Due Diligence Related Services,Atlantic Housing Partners— PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Rolling Green Site Assessments,Sarasota,Florida 2010-2014 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Atlantic Housing Partners,LLLP Marc Gauthier, PE (407)741-8514 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost.) Since the formation of the company in 2000, E Sciences has been providing due diligence services to Atlantic Housing Partners, LLLP(AHP). They develop rent controlled and market rate multi-family housing developments in Florida and Georgia. Soon after a potential project site is identified, AHP contracts E Sciences to conduct a Phase I ESAs, asbestos surveys and ecological assessments addressing both potential wetland and threatened and endangered species issues. If required,Phase II ESAs, source removals, asbestos abatements, wetland delineations,gopher tortoise surveys and relocations or other regulatory agency negotiations are conducted. When AHP purchases and develops contaminated lands, AT: E Sciences conducts the assessment and remediation though regulatory closure. -_ Rolling Green, Sarasota Florida A Phase I ESA was conducted on a proposed multi-family residential • property, Rolling Green, in Sarasota Florida. The Phase I ESA report r.µ ; - identified an adjoining golf course with stormwater discharges originating from the course. Therefore, a Phase II ESA consisting of soil and groundwater sampling was implemented at the Site. Arsenic in • _ -- concentrations in excess of the Soil and Groundwater Clean-up Target Levels were identified. The project was receiving funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development so the assessment had to be completed on an expedited basis. The impacts were reported to the agencies and E Sciences collaborated with them to expedite the document submittal and review process. E Sciences completed a Site Assessment Report (SAR), Interim Source Removal (ISR) and Natural Attenuation Monitoring (NAM) Plan for the Site as documented in our report dated August 30, 2012. Conditional approval of this report was received from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)in a letter dated September 13,2012.The ISR of the arsenic impacted soil was implemented and documented in our ISR Report submitted to the FDEP on October 11, 2012. FDEP approved the ISR report in a letter dated October 16, 2012. The SAR Approval was conditional upon horizontal delineation of the arsenic impacted groundwater in the shallow aquifer once development of the Site was completed. Following Site development, wells were reinstalled, and groundwater analytical results indicated that arsenic concentrations had been delineated to the east, west, and south with Rolling Green Golf Course located to the north. Therefore, E Sciences initially recommended implementation of the NAM Plan.After several months of NAM, FDEP agreed that the arsenic in the groundwater on the Site was related to the adjacent golf course and issued a letter indicating that no additional monitoring would be required at the Rolling Green site. Project Budget/Fees:$187,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. E Sciences,Incorporated Orlando, Florida Prime Consultant b (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE E Sciences,Incorporated Fort Lauderdale,Florida Support to Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-23 2 EXAtin . F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT 1 0 (Present as many projects as requested by the agency.or 10 projects,if not specified Complete one Section F for each project) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Environmental Engineering Continuing Services-Rucks Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) City of North Miami,Miami-Dade County,Florida 2015-Ongoing N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of North Miami Wisler Pierre-Louis (305)895-9830 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope.size,and cost.) Rucks Park: E Sciences is assisting the City of North Miami with anp. A wh C ::..'.7.7 Q+• °_!'! environmental assessment in preparation for future development of this site - , which operated a wastewater treatment plant, nursery and storage area for firl�R. 1. .„„ ' , ` sludge and street sweeping materials. The treatment plant operated at this City- ,, •;- ,__.- �`, , .., C owned property from the early 1960s to the mid-1980s. Soil and groundwater contamination was first discovered during assessment activities conducted by .. _fir , others in 2008. Several iterations of assessments were subsequently conducted air:'+ '_ --' , by other consultants through 2014. However, the cumulative assessment +�; ek .',' ;+• - activities were not sufficient to move forward with site remediation and ultimate . - +-) .h� 1 regulatory closure of the site. Contamination impacts have been reported onsite x r and offsite,further complicating the regulatory frame and scope of this project. i A Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement (BSRA) was executed between the '--1--- ' .1 ,• T- City of North Miami and Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental ,• - _ �, - ; Resources Management (DERM) in December 2014. The City engaged i•.� 77��44 _ • • �'T_ . 1 via- E Sciences in November 2015 to prepare a Site Assessment Report Addendum i , ,}z,:4 '' R-' '" • � (SARA)in response to regulatory comments issued by DERM based on previous assessment data reported by others. E Sciences conducted a review of historical data to develop a comprehensive understanding of the site conditions and regulatory status and submitted a SARA to DERM in January 2016. Upon review of DERM feedback, E Sciences conducted additional and updated assessment documenting additional groundwater sampling activities and soil assessment.The groundwater sampling scope was intended to establish site boundary conditions and defer additional sampling in the interior of the Site until the development plans for the Site are better defined. - Since the submittal of the SARA documents, E Sciences collaborated with DERM and _~ the City in order to develop a sampling and assessment strategy focused on potential offsite impacts and property boundaries in lieu of an otherwise costly and intensive r �� assessment scope while providing assurance to DERM that exposure to contamination is restricted based on the current site use and layout.Additional onsite testing would be __ - --i• _. , conducted at a later date as necessary, with testing activities to be directed based upon • �- • data collected during this proposed assessment and future site development plan. �. 7__—_-_-_-,--___4____ .1. E Sciences is currently preparing a sampling plan to refine the arsenic and ammonia -' __ •• rl -.., ; plumes along the property boundary, evaluate the need for additional ammonia = • -�'�- r 1 ` delineation along the property boundary, develop a groundwater monitoring program as —S•'= �- y--- --� an interim measure until development plans are further along,and develop soil sampling a plan to complete the of the arsenic soil impacts limited to the western boundary. Contract BudgetlFees:$69,622 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. E Sciences, Incorporated Fort Lauderdale, FL Prime Consultant Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications Page 2-24 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F PERSONNEL CONTRACT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before (From Section E.Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) completing table. Place"X"under project key number for participation in same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Nadia G.Locke, PE, LEED AP Project Manager I X X X X X X X X X Senior Engineer Maria Paituvi, PE Senior Engineer X X X X X X X Scott Evanson,PG Senior Geologist X X X X X X X Flormari Blackburn,PE Senior Engineer X X X • Jennifer Savaro, MS Staff Scientist X X X Joshua Stocker Staff Scientist X X X X X • 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Seminole County General Environmental Services— 1 Continuing Services. Miami Beach. Miami-Dade 6 Seminole County Sports Complex, Seminole County, County, Florida Florida City of North Miami Beach General Environmental Broward County Mass Transit Copans Road Facility, 2 Engineering Services,Taylor Park, City of North 7 Broward County, Florida Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida Seminole County General Environmental Services— Lakewood Pointe 3 Seminole County Rolling Hills Golf Course, Seminole 8 Seffner, Hillsborough County. Florida County, Florida Brownfield Assessment and Remediation Contract— General Due Diligence Related Services. Atlantic 4 West Palm Beach City Hall, City of West Palm 9 Housing Partners—Rolling Green Site Assessments, Beach, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Sarasota, Florida Palm Beach. Florida Brownfield Assessment and Remediation Contract— Environmental Engineering Continuing Services— 5 Henrietta Bridge Farm. City of West Palm Beach, 10 Rucks Park. City of North Miami. Miami-Dade Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Palm County, Florida Beach, Florida Tab 2 Experience & Qualifications - Page 2-25 H.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30.PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY.ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. E Sciences, Incorporated(E Sciences)is an environmental,engineering and ecological consulting firm providing a wide range of services to clients in both the public and private sectors. Our company was formed in 2000,bringing together a team of professional and technical staff members with a long history of successfully executing projects throughout Florida and the Southeastern United States. Our fundamental philosophy is based on responsiveness,expertise and creating value for our clients. Environmental Consulting Services E Sciences provides a full range of environmental services to identify, remediate and resolve issues related to contamination of soil and groundwater. We have extensive experience investigating and remediating surface and subsurface environments for a variety of contaminants from petroleum, chlorinated solvents and other hazardous materials and are intimately familiar with geological and hydrogeological systems in Florida and the southeastern United States. Our environmental staff includes registered professional engineers and geologists, and degreed scientists whose expertise provides a comprehensive combined set of skills that support our clients' goals through and even beyond the planning,design and construction phases of projects. Engineering Consulting Services Our engineering staff includes professionally licensed engineers with degrees in civil and environmental engineering. E Sciences provides a broad scope of engineering services related to water quality management, stormwater management,transportation support, infrastructure management, hydrologic restoration and preservation, watershed planning and FEMA floodplain management and permitting, and permitting and compliance. We assist clients with major regulatory programs such as NPDES Phase I and Phase II permitting and compliance, Clean Water Act services, and numerous other specialty areas. E Sciences professionals are skilled in facilities engineering, including transaction support services such as Property Condition Surveys and Development Feasibility Studies for industrial and commercial land uses. Ecological Consulting Services Our ecological staff includes full-time senior environmental scientists with degrees in soil and water science, ecology, biology, earth science, urban forestry and marine biology. E Sciences' primary ecological services include wetland delineation and evaluation; wildlife surveys and permitting; habitat assessments and conversation plans; marine and coastal ecology; wetland and habitat restoration; urban forestry and tree inventories; land management, and natural systems analysis. We have extensive experience permitting projects with the USACE,USFWS,FDEP,Water Management Districts and local municipalities throughout Florida. (.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 32.DATE ' ~� January 16,2018 33.NAME AND TITLE Peter K. Partlow,P.E.,President Tab 2 Experience&Qualifications Page 2-26 ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS 1 SOLI NOATTION7NU8MBER If any) PART II — GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices. complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a.FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4.DUNS NUMBER E Sciences,Incorporated–Fort Lauderdale,Florida --Scie ces ENGINI �,:,<; 2000 001998678 2b.STREET I ENVIRONMENTA. 5.OWNERSHIP 224 SE 9:h Street ECOLOGICAL a.TYPE Corporation 2c.CITY 2d.STATE ' 2e.ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Fort Lauderdale Florida 33316 Small Business 6a.POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7.NAME OF FIRM(If block 2a is a branch office) Nadia G. Locke, PE/E Sciences Project Manager/Associate E Sciences, Incorporated 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 34 East Pine Street (954)484-8500 nlocke@esciencesinc.com Orlando, FL 32801 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) 8b.YR ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER N/A N/A N/A 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c.No.of Employees _ a.Profile c.Revenue Code b.Discipline b.Experience Index Number Code (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH (see below) 02 Administrative 9 2 C18 Cost Estimating 2 12 Civil Engineer 4 1 E01 Ecological/Archeological Investigations 3 19 Ecologist 4 0 E09 Environmental Impact Studies/Assessments or 4 Statements 23 Environmental Engineer 10 5 E10 Environmental and Natural Resource Mapping 1 24 Environmental Scientist 16 8 E11 Environmental Planning 2 29 GIS Specialist 2 1 E12 Environmental Remediation 2 30 Geologist 2 1 E13 Environmental Testing and Analysis 1 58 Technicians/Interns 2 0 G04 Geographic Info Systems Development/Analysis 1 H07 Highways. Streets,Airfield Paving, Parking Lots 3 H11 Housing(Residential, Multi-Family) 1 103 Industrial Waste Treatment 1 M06 Mining and Mineralogy 1 UO2 Urban Renewal: Community Development 1 S05 ' Soils&Geologic Studies. Foundations 1 S13 Storm Water Handling&Facilities 1 W02 Water Resources, Hydrology, Groundwater 1 Total 49 18 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 1 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 6 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work 6 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATU b.DATE IJanuary 16, 2018 ''' _. k.—_ ' 4t' l,— Cv c.NAME AND TITLE Peter K. Partlow, P.E.. President Tab 2 Experience & Qualifications Page 2-27 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 2.2 Qualifications of Prime Proposer (Firm) E Sciences was formed in 2000 and we started our Southeast Florida presence in 2002. Our very first contract was a districtwide contract with the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)to help them manage their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. To this day, we still maintain that contract although we have had to re-compete for it several times. Similarly, in southeast Florida, we also were awarded a similar NPDES Districtwide Contract and have held that contract for nearly 10 years. Having these solid and reputable contracts allowed us to pursue the natural course of securing municipal contracts. E Sciences has directly relevant experience and a proven track record for providing the scope of services identified in this solicitation to the City and to other Florida public sector agencies. We have been providing similar services under the following local prime municipal continuing service contracts: • City of Miami Beach Continuing Environmental and Coastal Engineering Services(Second term) • City of Miami General Environmental Engineering Services • City of North Miami Beach Continuing Professional Services(Second term) • City of North Miami Continuing Environmental Engineering Services • City of Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Environmental Engineering Services (Second term) • City of Fort Lauderdale General Environmental Engineering(Second Term) • City of Homestead Architectural-Engineering Services • City of Pompano Beach Environmental Engineering Services • Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Brownfields Assessment and Remediation Services(Third Term) • City of West Palm Beach Henrietta Farm Brownfields Cleanup Contract • Village of Islamorada Consulting Engineering Services(Ongoing Since 2003) • City of Marathon Professional Engineering Services Under these contracts,we provide similar scopes of services to the ones required under this contract. Our Miami-Dade technical certification categories include the following: • Environmental Engineering—Stormwater Drainage Design Engineering Services • Environmental Engineering—Geology Services • Environmental Engineering—Biology Services • Environmental Engineering—Contamination Assessment and Monitoring • Environmental Engineering—Remedial Action Plan Design • Environmental Engineering—Wellfield, Groundwater, Surface Water Protection and Management • Civil Engineering As the firm has grown, the number of municipal long-term contracts has increased, and the quality of our services has ensured that many of these clients remain as repeat customers. We focus solely on providing outstanding technical service in the fields of environmental engineering,environmental science and ecological consulting. I � „ Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications—Page 2-28 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Working with City staff is more than a job or a single project, it is a commitment to the community and a willingness to provide more than expected.We believe it is important to not only be an outstanding consultant, but to be a partner. As your partner, we are committed to keeping City staff informed on changing regulatory issues and how they may affect policy and the ability to manage this one of a kind island community environment. The City has a unique environment, as well as a rich and distinctive history, both of which require sustainable solutions through innovative planning and design. E Sciences' prime philosophy is one that promotes quality development through sustainable design. We recognize the importance of being stewards of the land to preserve these precious resources for future generations. E Sciences is not a mega multi-disciplinary firm, but rather, a specialized consultant dealing in all aspects of environmental engineering services. We do not have layers of bureaucracy through which you need to maneuver—our staff is responsive and accessible. Whether it is a large contamination remediation project or a small Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), we give each project the same attention to detail. Our team has the ability to respond quickly and cost effectively to projects of varying size. Specific Project Examples The RFQ requested that we demonstrate relevant experience in the scope of services. Through our resumes and project descriptions, you can see that we have vast experience in conducting site assessment reports, soil management plans and remediation projects. Below we highlight some specific examples of completing construction documents for environmental assessments and remediation on projects of three acres or more and where arsenic contamination has been identified: • Taylor Park is a 21-acre abandoned park in North Miami Beach. We are the design criteria professional for Miami-Dade County for this project. We conducted all the - r .. site assessment and remediation planning documents, prepared the contract documents, conducted the pre-bid walk through, prepared the addenda to the RFQ and are performing the construction administration activities, such as inspections, ' all the way through final certification and submittal of as-built plans. • Green Waste Facility is a nearly three-acre site in Miami Beach. E Sciences completed the assessment and developed the design of the engineering control, • along with the plan notes used to secure the contractor. We conducted environmental engineering inspections, developed as-built drawings and received closure and acceptance on the engineering control. Arsenic was one of the contaminants at this site. • Rolling Green started as a due diligence project that became a full site assessment and regulatory closure on an expedited timeframe for this 13-acre site. The contaminant of concern was arsenic, and the source was a former golf course. The assessment and source removal were completed in 2012 and the site received regulatory closure in just over three years. • Rolling Hills Golf Course (not to be confused with Rolling Green) is a 100-acre _ =r=- former golf course operated for nearly 100 years before closing. This site was ; - • contaminated with arsenic and dieldrin and the county wanted to purchase it and redevelop it as a park. E Sciences completed a full assessment or soil, sediment _ -� _—; and groundwater, remediation planning and development of remediation costs. Remediation is pending. Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications—Page 2-29 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center • City of Miami Contaminated Park Projects. We are currently conducting monthly inspections and quarterly reporting for the integrity of the engineering controls for eleven City of Miami Parks that are documented to have contamination from incinerator ash burial. We are also conducting off-site assessment and preparing the environmental construction notes for one of the parks, Douglas Park, where they City of Miami's contractor is installing a new community center, playground, and exercise equipment. Our environmental notes are related to the handling of contaminated material, air monitoring, health and safety and the replacement of the engineering control. These parks range in size from '/4 acre to 22 acres (most of them much larger than three acres) and arsenic is one of the main contaminants of concern.We note that Douglas Park is 10 acres in size. • Fort Lauderdale Trash Transfer Station. This site is 30.5 acres in size and is the -- site of the City of Fort Lauderdale's former municipal incinerator. Arsenic is one of the contaminants of concern identified in the soil and groundwater. E Sciences k prepared the closure and engineering control plan and construction documents for the City of Fort Lauderdale to bid the project. } • Truman Waterfront Park. This 23-acre former navy site is being converted from historic uses including hazardous waste storage to a waterfront park for the City of $.. Key West. The site has a vast history of contamination, including arsenic, and .7.--, ,s —, r s,.. E Sciences developed the environmental documents that were part of the bidding _- * �",p. g, and construction documents. Documents we developed included a soil =`''-....14-k3,-_1:-5:::,44511i. management plan, scope items related to handling contaminated soil and }. -- 4 dewatering contaminated groundwater and construction notes. We attended the pre-bid meeting and presented the environmental aspects of the project and provided responses to request for additional information from contractors for inclusion into bid document addenda. 2.3 Qualifications of Prime Proposer's Team (Geologists and Engineers) Upon award of this contract, Nadia 0. Locke, PE, LEED AP will lead the project team. Ms. Locke has extensive experience managing public sector contracts and projects such as these with nearly 30 years of environmental engineering experience and a .,, l', demonstrated commitment to the City. Ms. Locke's comprehensive environmental experience includes conducting environmental assessments, contamination assessments and remediation. She is very knowledgeable of regulatory tools and policies that can be used to benefit projects. She is an expert in the contamination arena and has served as an expert witness on several cases including a golf course with arsenic contamination, two other large tracts of land (a gun range, an industrial port project) and a contamination plume covering more than 200 acres down to depths over 100 feet. She has also provided expert support services for Miami-Dade Aviation Department and the FDOT. High profile projects she has conducted include the assessment and remediation oversight for the American Airlines Arena and lead paint and asbestos removal for the Deering Estate. She is currently managing the environmental aspects of the Beach Rapid Transit Corridor study that is now expanded to incorporate the leg from Alton and 5th Street to the Miami-Beach Convention Center. She is responsible for the environmental screening for this project as it moves through the alternatives analysis for the selection of the alignment and transit technologies. She was involved in the City's Sea Level Rise Study that was used as a basis for establishing the City's base elevations for infrastructure. Ms. Locke is highly qualified to serve as Project Manager. She specializes in managing projects for municipalities. Not only has she managed projects with the City under our existing contract, but she has supported other consultants in their work within the City. Projects like the environmental testing at the South Pointe Wastewater Booster Station (subconsultant to CDM Smith), environmental permitting for the Fleet Management Seawall Rehabilitation moi, Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications—Page 2-30 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center (subconsultant to Bermello Ajamil) and groundwater monitoring at the Normandy Golf Course (subconsultant to BCC Engineering)demonstrate that we are the"go to"environmental consultant for projects within the City. Ms. Locke is a former President of the Florida Brownfields Association and South Florida Association of Environmental Professionals. She is the Chair for the Smart Growth Partnership and is a member of the Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization Community Advisory Committee. Ms. Locke served on the ASTM International Committees for developing standards for Sustainability(E60) and Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and Corrective Action (E50). She is a leader in evolving environmental issues and regulations and regularly presents on environmental issues at conferences. Maria Paituvi, PE has been providing deputy project management on our existing contract with the City and has demonstrated a track record of responsiveness, quality and budget control. She has 12 years of experience in environmental engineering projects. Her project versatility includes environmental assessment and remediation, regulatory evaluation and compliance, stormwater management, and environmental permitting. Ms. Paituvi strives to implement innovative technological alternatives and regulatory alternatives to address the specific conditions and meet the goals for each project. Ms. Paituvi has worked closely with other municipalities and public agencies, including the City of North Miami Beach, North Bay Village, City of Fort Lauderdale, Pompano Beach CRA, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade County Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and FDOT. Ms. Paituvi has the technical and management skills, and dedication to the environmental field necessary to understand the needs of each individual project and develop a practical approach to meet the City's needs and expectations. Over the years, Ms. Paituvi has developed professional relationships with other consultants and regulatory agencies, creating a large network of environmental professionals. These relationships have lead to multiple collaboration efforts such as the upcoming presentation of case studies at the Florida Brownfields Association conference. She supported the nomination of the SFAEP Leadership in Environmental Acheivements and Foresight for collaboration and partnership on the City's Groundwater Elevation Study, conducted to evaluate Sea Level Rise in the City. This award was presented to the team consisting of the City, Florida Atlantic University and E Sciences. Ms. Paituvi managed this project and prepared the final report. " " "" E Sciences proposes that Mr. Scott Evanson PG will provide QA/QC oversight to the project. Mr. Evanson has extensive experience providing QA/QC oversite to public Ali sector contracts and over thirty years of environmental experience. His environmental :i'_. experience includes conducting and reviewing environmental assessments, ,x,40` contamination assessments and remediation plans and implementations. Mr. Evanson --, has also conducted environmental permitting and management and oversight of ecological projects. Similar Florida contracts that he has provided QA/QC oversight 443 include environmental engineering contracts for the Miami-Dade Aviation Department, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Orange and Seminole Counties and the City of Orlando. The following is an organizational chart,followed by resumes of our dedicated personnel. cies Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications—Page 2-31 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Organizational Chart V Q UJ CO _ N £ U 4 GO u) E is m N tY o a m 'p ti co = C L N CO m p▪ :: CO = rn o 0> w = O ▪ + 4-• N = H > a O W sem.. V - e ,..- N W pJEOR R W sc >c co E03 R d y ocvcaL CJIj 32 O U O▪ .E N it '-' Y � D. m is Q Cu_ c c N C) 0 ,ca u) C 0 U) CU O O p -1 C o a) .0 U >. � o :4 to E —, - � � Z a 0_ d m2s _ d 0 U ._N 'L d r LL ISas Q CI) L _ Co Z . . W as c 3 0 D . p a V L O U N O a c W ii O U 0) In m U v N I ( . CO: I Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications—Page 2-32 I ENGINEERING Sciences ENVIRONMENTAL Nadia G. Locke, P.E., LEED AP ECOLOGICAL Associate Ms. Locke has been providing professional environmental and engineering consulting services for over 29 years. During her career, she has worked in Education many facets of environmental consulting including environmental audits, site B.S. Materials Science and Engineering, assessment and remediation, stormwater design, sanitary sewer planning, University of Florida, 1988 environmental permitting, climate change impact evaluation, grant assistance, Professional Licenses/Certifications wetland mitigation design, endangered species relocations, Brownfields, Professional Engineer: FL-58676 community involvement, and training. Ms. Locke has provided litigation LEED AP Neighborhood Development support for the FDOT, Miami-Dade Aviation Department, Barry University and private entities. She also serves as E Sciences' Corporate Quality Assurance Certified FDEP Stormwater, Erosion and Officer. Sedimentation Control Inspector#3263 and Instructor#130 Ms. Locke is Chair of the Smart Growth Partnership(SGP) and serves on the OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER/8 Hour Site MPO Community Advisory Committee. Ms. Locke is a former President of the Supervisor Florida Brownfields Association (FBA) and South Florida Association of NAUI/PADI Advanced Open Water Diver Environmental Professionals. She served as a commission-appointee to the Years of Experience Broward County Brownfields Redevelopment Task Force. She also served as 29 FBA Secretary, Co-Chair of the 17th Annual Conference and Co-Chair of the Technical Subcommittee of the Legislative and Policy Committee. Project Experience Expert Witness for Village Green Golf Course, Sarasota County, Florida– Ms. Locke served as an expert witness on this contaminated golf course. The essence of the litigation was determination of the industry standard and All Appropriate Inquiry requirements of assessing an environmental condition of an active golf course during due diligence. Beach Corridor Rapid Transit, Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works, Miami-Dade County, Florida— Ms. Locke is the project manager for the environmental documentation to satisfy the NEPA requirements for federal funding. This project is an approximately 13-mile corridor that extends from the Miami Design District to Government Center, eastbound along 1-395 to Miami Beach and north to the Miami Beach Convention Center. Several alternatives are being evaluated to provide a rapid transit solution. Funding agencies include the Federal Transit Administration, FDOT, Miami- Dade County and the Cities of Miami and Miami Beach. Ruck's Park, City of North Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida— E Sciences was engaged by the City of North Miami in 2016 to assist them with managing documented contamination issues related to the following historical activities: wastewater sludge pond, street sweepings storage, plant nursery, underground storage tank. E Sciences is working with the City to address the contamination issues through conducting site assessment that will enable the City to develop the site for elderly, affordable housing. Contaminants of concern include arsenic, coliform, ammonia, dieldrin and polynyclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Our approach is to focus testing in the areas necessary to define the extent of impacts and areas of potential concern related to the future land use (e.g. drainage, green space, etc.). A Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement (BSRA) was executed between the City of North Miami and Miami-Dade County on December 23, 2014. Ms. Locke provides technical oversight and QA/QC on this project. General Environmental Engineering Services, City of Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida — Ms. Locke is the contract manager for an ongoing contract to conduct miscellaneous environmental services and has managed various projects executed under the contract. Projects conducted to date include preparation of spill prevention control and countermeasure plans for 12 facilities including pump stations, fire stations, public works yard, Miami Beach Golf Club and the Convention Center and contamination assessment of the green waste facility. E Sciences is supporting the City in seeking conditional closure for contamination issues at a former solid waste facility and golf course. We also completed a hydrogeological and mapping study for the City to use in considering sea level rise in future infrastructure development. Nadia G. Locke, P.E., LEED AP Page 2 Truman Waterfront Park Environmental Consultation, Monroe County, City of Key West, Florida—The City of Key West Naval Properties Local Redevelopment Agency (LRA) has been engaged in the acquisition, planning and permitting of the redevelopment of a portion of the former U.S. Navy Truman Waterfront base since 1995 as allowed by the Federal Government's Base Realignment and Closure process. Overall project consists of designing and implementing a thematically integrated waterfront park consistent with the character of a surrounding historic community. E Sciences reviewed the contamination assessment and remediation history of these parcels to ascertain and assist the City in understanding existing and proposed land use restrictions to determine the requirements for site development and use as a public park. E Sciences developed a soil and groundwater management plan to address contamination issues during construction and to communicate the engineering controls that will be required to be installed and maintained. This process involved coordination with the Navy and its consultants and the FDEP and providing technical support during the bidding and award of the construction. Ms. Locke was the senior technical reviewer for this project. South Pointe Wastewater Booster Station, City of Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida — E Sciences, as a subconsultant to CDM, provided environmental testing services for this City of Miami Beach contract. Ms. Locke supported CDM during development of bidding documents for this project. She conducted testing to evaluate potential environmental and safety considerations related to creosote treated timbers used in the foundation of the former water tower. Miami Beach Redevelopment Parcels— Ms. Locke conducted numerous Phase I ESAs in the Southpointe area during the 1990s for a developer who purchased and redeveloped several properties from 15th Street down to Southpointe Park. Sistrunk Boulevard Streetscape and Enhancement, City of Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida—Originally slated as a stimulus project where funds were being disbursed through FDOT District Four, Ms. Locke conducted a Level 2 assessment of a 1.25-mile corridor streetscape enhancement project located in the heart of the City of Fort Lauderdale CRA. Testing included Maintenance of Traffic, private utility location and collection of 36 soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. Data was compiled and reported, and environmental notes/bid specification language was developed for bidding purposes. Ms. Locke also engaged the CRA in avoidance and minimization considerations and assisted the CRA with managing risks associated with environmental issues during construction. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Brownfields Assessment and Remediation Services — Ms. Locke managed E Sciences' contract with the TCRPC for conducting assessment and remediation services as part of an EPA Brownfield Assessment and Cleanup Grants. A notable project is the hallmark Former City Hall Building that has been bid for purchase and redevelopment. This project included Phase I and Phase II ESAs, a Site Assessment Report, Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup, and a Soil Management Plan. E Sciences worked with the CRA on a strategy to manage the environmental aspects of the project during the bidding and construction phase of the project. Expert Witness, Barry University School of Law, Manatee County, Florida—Ms. Locke provided expert witness services in support of an administrative hearing for a complex case. The site is a chlorinated solvent impacted area that has affected the drinking water supply and several hydrogeologic strata in an Environmental Justice community. Ms. Locke provided opinions as to the adequacy of assessment activities to characterize the extent and nature of contamination and the exposure pathways. Services included development of strategy for the technical challenge,deposition,expert testimony and rebuttal. Contamination Assessment and Remediation Oversight, American Airlines Arena— Ms. Locke conducted the original Phase I ESA for the Bicentennial Park and FEC Property for Miami-Dade County. The Phase I ESA revealed historic site use as a large port with bulk fuel storage and railroads. In order to construct the AAA on the FEC property, Ms. Locke managed extensive assessment activities. She conducted remedial action planning oversight. The project was based on an accelerated time frame. Construction was able to commence within four months of initial site work. Project success was attributed to Ms. Locke's ability to deal with the construction, due diligence, regulatory and environmental aspects of this fast track, high profile, and politically charged project. Her client was the Miami-Dade County Manager's Office. Nadia G. Locke, P.E., LEED AP Page 3 Arsenic Assessment, Florida Keys Property, Confidential Client, Monroe County, Florida— E Sciences was hired as a third party independent to assist in resolution of a responsible party dispute over a contaminated property in the Florida Keys. Ms. Locke conducted testing and provided analytical results to support her client's position that they were not the responsible party for assessment and remediation of the contaminated site. Sunshine Rock Mine, Private Receiver, Miami-Dade County, Florida — When the owner of this property passed away, E Sciences was retained by the receiver to evaluate potential environmental liabilities associated with this property. A Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment revealed contamination related to petroleum and arsenic. A review of environmental and mining permits identified numerous outstanding permit compliance issues. Opinions of probable costs to rectify the environmental conditions to bring the site into compliance were developed. Ms. Locke was the project manager. Seminole County General Environmental Services, Seminole County, Florida— Ms. Locke has been involved in several of E Sciences' projects performed under our continuing services contract with Seminole County. Projects have included site assessment and remedial action planning. Seawall Repairs at Fleet Management, City of Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida — E Sciences provided environmental support to Bermello Ajamil (B&A) on this bulkhead design and rehabilitation project located at the City of Miami Beach's Fleet Management Property. Ms. Locke provided project management and assisted with the preparation of environmental permit applications to the Miami-Dade Department of Environmental Management (DERM), the FDEP and the USACE. This project was permitted and construction has begun. Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Continuing Contract for Environmental Engineering Services, City of Pompano Beach, Broward County, Florida — Ms. Locke is the contract manager for this contract. E Sciences conducted Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments for several parcels in preparation for the CRA's redevelopment planning. Ms. Locke is working with the CRA to consider options on how to safely manage construction on a solid waste disposal site and is preparing environmental documentation to satisfy National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)on a Local Agency Program (LAP)project. Miami-Dade Community College Miscellaneous Environmental Services, Miami-Dade County, Florida — Ms. Locke worked on numerous Miami-Dade County Community College (MDCC) campuses including Wolfson, Medical Center and Homestead. She conducted many projects related to indoor air quality, storage tank closures, due diligence services and contamination assessment/remediation. Ms. Locke conducted an assessment/remediation plan for the college's largest contaminated site, an old incinerator ash landfill. This property was historically operated as a municipal landfill by the City of Miami and was slated for development as a parking garage for the Medical Center Campus. Extensive consideration was given to removal of hazardous waste and worker protection during construction. Risk Based Corrective Action, Homestead Air Force Base—Ms. Locke used risk assessment as a tool to assist her clients achieve their site acquisition, construction and redevelopment goals. This project included a risk assessment of benzo(a)pyrene and arsenic to address concerns related to clean-up standards that could be inconsistently applied to the federal government and MDCPS. In meetings with the Base Realignment Cleanup Team, and subsequent risk assessment justification, Ms. Locke successfully negotiated alternative clean-up standards with the Air Force, EPA, FDEP and DERM. ENGINEERING =r SCI ces ENVIRONMENTAL Maria Paituvi, P.E. ECOLOGICAL Senior Engineer Ms. Paituvi has 12 years of experience in environmental consulting in South Florida. Her technical experience includes environmental assessment and Education remediation of contaminated sites, as well as industrial wastewater B.S., Environmental Engineering Sciences, permitting, environmental compliance, and stormwater permit review and University of Florida, 2005 renewal. Ms. Paituvi has actively collaborated on site investigation and Professional Licenses I Certifications environmental assessments, remedial action planning and design. She is Florida Professional Engineer experienced in data validation, interpretation and reporting, and regulatory License No.73008 compliance. As a project manager, she is responsible for cost estimating and tracking, task scheduling and timely completion of projects. From the OSHA 40 Hour Hazardous Waste various and numerous projects completed, she has gained practical Operations and Emergency Response experience in environmental field investigation, monitoring and sampling Certified FDEP Stormwater, Erosion and tasks, construction planning and oversight, development planning, Sedimentation Control Inspector No.27077 remediation system installation and operation,and regulatory compliance. Years of Experience 12 Project Experience Properties Adjacent to Miami Beach Convention Center-City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, Miami-Dade County, Florida - In preparation of development of City owned properties, E Sciences conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)for land parcels adjacent to the Miami Beach Convention Center.These parcels included a parking lot west of the convention center and the 21st Street Community Center and Bandshell north of the convention center. The Phase I ESA revealed the historic operation of a golf course on the project sites.This finding was identified as a recognized environmental condition(REC)based on the potential historical application of herbicides and pesticides on the ground.A Phase II ESA was conducted by E Sciences to evaluate the potential presence of soil and groundwater impacts based on the historical use of the sites. Incremental Sampling Methodology was implemented to evaluate the potential presence of soil impacts and limited groundwater testing was conducted. ISM results were indicative of the presence of arsenic concentrations above Miami-Dade criteria. Nitrate and arsenic were identified above the regulatory standards in the groundwater. Upon coordination with Miami-Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources(RER)Department,the City has elected to implement an engineering control and source removal efforts as part of the development plan for the sites. The full site assessment is pending the City's progress on redevelopment of the properties. Green Waste Facility, Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida—This site is an undeveloped, bermed area located on the east side of the Miami Beach Golf Club. The site was previously used for solid waste landfilling. The City implemented a material screening plan to remove buried solid waste. The recovered screened material (RSM) was used to construct a berm around the former landfilled area. DERM required the City to demonstrate that there is a minimum of two feet of clean fill or other engineering control in place covering areas of solid waste in or around the berm in order pursue regulatory closure for the site. Upon review of the soil data, the City proposed to implement an engineering control (EC) to achieve conditional site closure. Ms. Paituvi prepared a review of historical resources to identify the areas of concern to be addressed by the proposed EC, prepared an engineering control design and coordinated regulatory meetings to seek approval of this closure approach. The EC design included guidance and recommendation for the installation of the cover.The proposed EC was constructed and consists of two feet of clean soil over the RSM berm. Ms. Paituvi coordinated and oversaw the construction activities to verify the proper installation of the cover and handling of the contaminated soil. E Sciences prepared as-built drawings and cross- sections documenting the constructed condition of the berm. She also prepared and submitted an inspection, monitoring and maintenance plan for the EC. Truman Waterfront Park Soil Management Plan, City of Key West, Monroe County, Florida—E Sciences prepared a Soil Groundwater Management Plan to be implemented during construction activities based on the documented presence of contamination impacts within the proposed development site. E Sciences' staff reviewed the assessment and remediation history of the proposed development parcels to assist the City in understanding existing and proposed land use restrictions to determine the requirements for site development and use as a public park. The Soil and Groundwater Management Plan was developed to provide protocols and measures to handle contaminated media and to identify the engineering controls that would Maria Paituvi, P.E. Page 2 be required to be installed and maintained as part of the site development. This process involved coordination with the U.S. Navy and the FDEP to compile the necessary historical assessment information. Ms. Paituvi completed the document review and provided the communication bridge with the parties involved to convey the extensive information into the Soil and Groundwater Management Plan that has been conceptually approved by FDEP and the U.S. Navy. Former West Palm Beach City Hall-Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Palm Beach County, Florida—The City of West Palm Beach relocated to a new location leaving the former location as a prime redevelopment spot in downtown. The City obtained grant funding from the TCRPC Brownfields Coalition Grant to conduct site assessment and asbestos surveying activities. The historic property was home to multiple potential sources of contamination, as is common with older urban areas. Historic land uses included gasoline stations, railroad tracks, cleaners, ice manufacturing and automotive repair facilities identified during a Phase I ESA. Ms. Paituvi developed and implemented a Phase II ESA sampling scope to evaluate the potential presence of soil and groundwater contamination at this site. Based on the results of the Phase II ESA, it was soil contamination was identified at the site. Using a "weight of evidence" approach, E Sciences demonstrated to the FDEP that contamination at the site was a result of the urban setting and not site-related. Ms. Paituvi prepared a Soil Management Plan (SMP)to be implemented during development activities at the site as an alternative to remediation. FDEP has approved of the SMP and no further assessment or remediation is required at the site. Henrietta Urban Farm, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Palm Beach County, Florida — Through the Brownfields Grant, this parcel was assessed in preparation for use as an urban garden. The site had been vacant for over a decade and was historically occupied by residential dwellings. A Phase I ESA revealed numerous and varied historical activities near the Site commonly associated with contamination have occurred historically near the Site. Historical facilities identified included lumber yards, dry cleaners, gasoline filling stations, auto repair shops, and railway maintenance facilities. Subsequent Phase II ESA activities included soil sampling and analysis to explore the possibility of undetected contaminants. Soil sampling was conducted using Incremental Sampling Methodology to collect a soil sample representative of site conditions. Groundwater sampling was conducted using direct push technology to evaluate the potential presence of groundwater impacts associated with potential migration of groundwater contamination from offsite sources. Groundwater sampling locations were selected based on the locations of the identified offsite facilities. Soil analytical results revealed the presence of Benzo(a)pyrenes (BaPs) above the FDEP Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs). BaPs are known anthropogenic contaminants commonly associated with the deposition of motor vehicle exhaust commonly encountered in urban areas. E Sciences assisted the City of West Palm Beach with securing a$200,000 cleanup grant from EPA. Taylor Park, North Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida -This property is an abandoned dump site that is slated by the City of North Miami Beach for redevelopment as a park.This project was riddled with complex issues,as it was operated as a solid waste dump and was occupied by a ball field and an operational daycare facility. Ms. Paituvi collaborated on site monitoring activities and documentation, including soil and groundwater sampling and conducted landfill gas monitoring in-situ and inside the on-site building structures. She also participated extensively in the preparation of a Remedial Technology Evaluation for this site, which considered the feasibility and cost efficiency of source removal, pump and treat, hydrologic barriers and the installation of geotechnical surface layer. She is currently the project manager and will be the engineer of record as the cleanup ensues. E Sciences is contracted with Miami-Dade County as the design criteria professional for this project. Sistrunk Boulevard Streetscape Enhancement, Fort Lauderdale CRA, Florida — Originally slated as a stimulus project where funds were being disbursed through FDOT District Four, E Sciences conducted a Level 2 assessment of a 1.5-mile corridor streetscape enhancement project located in the heart of the CRA. Field activities included Maintenance of Traffic, private utility location and collection of 36 soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. Ms. Paituvi assisted in planning and coordinating field activities and determining the sampling locations based on subsurface and drainage features. She also collaborated in data evaluation and validation and report preparation.As additional services to the client, Ms. Paituvi evaluated dewatering permitting requirements for the proposed roadway construction. Data was compiled and reported, and environmental notes/bid specification language was developed for bidding purposes. s'— ENGINEERING i— Sciences ENVIRONMENTAL Scott G. Evanson, P.G. ECOLOGICAL Senior Geologist Mr. Evanson is involved in the technical oversight and management of a wide range of geological and environmental projects. With over 34 years of Education experience, he has performed or reviewed contamination evaluations on M.B.A., Business Administration, Eastern commercial, agricultural and preservation tracts located primarily in the New Mexico University, 1987 southeastern United States. Tasks associated with these assessments B.S., Geology, Kansas University, 1981 include ground-penetrating radar, subsurface characterization, monitoring Professional Licenses I Certifications well installation, soil and groundwater sampling, grain size analysis and Florida Professional Geologist#1459 interpretation of chemical analysis. Site Assessment Reports were prepared OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER / 8 Hour Site for regulatory agencies and Remedial Actions were planned and Supervisor implemented,with site closure as the ultimate goal. Years of Experience Mr. Evanson has managed and conducted due diligence projects for several 34 large resort properties where acquisition and eventual additions were under consideration. Tasks included geotechnical engineering, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESAs), building condition surveys, natural resource evaluations, asbestos/lead based paint/mold surveys and utility evaluations. In addition, he has managed National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)evaluations of raw land and existing facilities in numerous states for a national builder of private detention facilities,tasks included archeological assessments, wetland and threatened and endangered species evaluations, Phase I and Phase II ESAs, evaluation of demographic information and documentation of potential community impacts related to the proposed action. Project Experience Atlantic Housing Partners LLLC, Various Locations, Florida—As the senior geologist and project manager for the Atlantic Housing Partners projects, Mr.Evanson provides oversight on numerous Phase I and Phase II ESAs,landfill gas and groundwater monitoring at a Brownfield Site. Atlantic Housing, Lakewood Pointe, Seffner, Florida—This facility was built on a historical construction debris dump. Project included oversite of deep dynamic compaction, monitoring of landfill generated gas and groundwater monitoring. Groundwater parameters included arsenic, benzo(a)pyrene,and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons. Mr. Evanson is the project manager for the Lakewood Pointe project. He also manages the Annual Director's Authorization Inspection Report for the permit to develop. This report includes data gathering and documentation on a historic solid waste disposal area,and inspections including certification that the facility and system of treatment, monitoring,control and related appurtenances were maintained, in good repair, and were properly functioning. Due Diligence Consulting, Site Assessment and Interim Source Removal, Rolling Green, Sarasota, Florida, Atlantic Housing Partners LLLC — Mr. Evanson managed the Phase I and II ESAs, Site Assessment Report, and Interim Source Removal consisting of the excavation and disposal of contaminated soils for this planned apartment community locate adjacent to an active golf course.Arsenic was detected in both the soil and groundwater.Project was completed on an accelerated schedule and included working with US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Delineation of the arsenic groundwater plume enabled the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to conclude that the arsenic source was located off site on an adjacent golf course,thus no remedial efforts for the groundwater were required. Seminole County Environmental Services Contract, Seminole County, Florida — Mr. Evanson currently serves as the technical reviewer and environmental project manager for this term contract. He has overseen Phase I and Phase II ESA's, as well as site assessment services. Seminole County Sports Complex: Mr. Evanson managed and provided technical oversite the to the Phase I And Phase II ESAs, and Interim Source Removal in support of Seminole County's efforts to purchase several tracts(102 acres total)of agricultural land located south of the Orlando/Sanford International Airport.The land had been used for celery farming in the Scott G. Evanson, P.G. Page 2 early 1900s and citrus groves since the end of World War II.Soil testing indicate that arsenic was present in the shallow soils in several areas. One area of dieldrin impacts was noted in the soil and no groundwater impacts were identified. The areas of soil impacts were delineated and Mr. Evanson managed the Interim Source Removal that resulted in the excavation and disposal of the dieldrin impacts soils.The areas of arsenic impacts were remediated by the construction contractor. Rolling Hills Golf Course: Mr. Evanson provided technical oversite the to the Phase I And Phase II ESAs, Site Assessment Report and Remedial Action Plan including an Opinion of Remedial Cost in support of Seminole County's efforts to purchase this closed golf course.The course had been active for nearly 100 years,and soil arsenic soil impacts were noted on several tees and fairways. In addition,groundwater impacts from dieldrin were identified in the maintenance area.The use of alternate soil clean-up target levels(GCTLs)was approved by FDEP contingent on the implementation of institutional controls.Source removal combined with soil mixing and engineering controls were proposed for the soil remediation.The groundwater impacts were delineated and ISCO was proposed for remediation of the dieldrin impacts. Remedial costs were developed to assist the County with real estate negotiations. Numerous Construction and Due Diligence Assessments, Miami International Airport and the Opa Locka Airport—Mr. Evanson provided technical oversight for pre-construction/due diligence assessments for numerous facilities at the Miami-Dade International and the Opa Locka Airports.The projects typically required the compilation of historic information and extensive soil and groundwater testing. In some cases, satisfying lease requirements and construction constraints for proposed tenants was required. Opinion of Remediation Costs, Miami-Dade Aviation Department (MDAD), Miami-Dade County, Florida — For several years, Mr. Evanson provided technical oversight for the development of an Opinion of Remediation Costs for over 100 consent order-related and several non-consent order environmental liabilities at the Miami International Airport.The Opinions of Cost were developed based on a review of the available information related to each environmental liability.This project generated(annually and semi-annually) a document that consistently supported an'A" bond rating. Comparison costs were developed using a risk- based corrective action approach as well as default cleanup standards. Pershing Area Remediation,City of Orlando,Orange County, Florida—Mr. Evanson served as a technical reviewer for this project. His technical role involved management of field activities and report development. The contamination evaluations delineated the horizontal and vertical extent of the identified Volatile Organic Compounds impacts. The supplemental site assessment identified a low permeability clay/clayey sand layer that appear to limit vertical migration of contaminants.Mr.Evanson also provided technical oversight regarding In-situ chemical oxidation and source removal. Orange County Environmental Site Assessment and Remediation Contract,Orange County,Florida—Mr.Evanson served as a task manager, technical reviewer and project manager for this term contract. Administrative services conducted involved contract management, including responsibility for disadvantaged business utilization and reporting, and billing. His technical role involved management of field activities, hydrogeological evaluation and report development. GEO Group,Inc., NEPA Evaluations,Various Locations,United States—As a builder/operator of private detention facilities, GEO Group Inc.is required to comply with NEPA requirements for facilities scheduled to house federal inmates.Mr.Evanson has managed NEPA evaluations for undeveloped land, prior to the construction of new detention facilities and for the conversion of existing detention facilities to federal facilities.These projects typically involve providing NEPA documentation for a wide range of issues for each proposed project and preparing the required reports for the U.S. Customs and Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Marshals Service, as appropriate.Coordination of multiple subcontractors was required for each of these projects. Private Theme Park,Orlando,Florida—Mr.Evanson serves as the project manager and technical reviewer for several ongoing projects involving assessment and source removal associated with releases of transformer oil. Due to the activity in the area, the majority of the work at these sites is performed after business hours. Eet es Sc. ces ENVIRONMENTAL Flormari Blackburn, P.E. ECOLOGICAL Senior Engineer With over 29 years of environmental engineering experience, Ms. Blackburn's technical strengths are in the areas of hazardous waste management, Education environmental compliance, remedial investigations, remedial engineering, BS,Chemical Engineering, University of environmental assessments, initial remedial action plans and activities, Florida, 1988 construction management, health and safety, operation and maintenance Professional Licenses I Certifications activities for remediation systems, long-term groundwater monitoring and Registered Engineer, Florida#47738 and regulatory reporting. She has performed petroleum-related rehabilitation action Puerto Rico#14877 activities in accordance with chapter 62-770 Florida Administrative Code, Years of Experience including the removal of excessively contaminated soils and underground 29 storage tanks. She has conducted operational audits to assess environmental liabilities and management, operational, and environmental issues related to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste management, past and current disposal practices, and environmental compliance with respect to water,soil waste, hazardous waste,and spill prevention and control.Ms. Blackburn has been involved in environmental assessment within the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) process. Types of facilities have included service stations,bioagricultural facilities,transportation centers,airports,prisons,military bases,printing operations,golf course maintenance areas, sanitary waste treatment plants, potable water treatment plants, heavy equipment and vehicle maintenance facilities, and several fuel tank farms. Project Experience Rolling Hills Golf Course,Longwood,Florida—Ms. Blackburn serves as the Engineer of record for this project that started with the completion of a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment(ESA).The assessment revealed that concentrations of arsenic and dieldrin in soils exceed the applicable soil cleanup target levels(SCTLs)on areas of the golf course and maintenance building area. In addition, dieldrin was identified in the maintenance building area groundwater. Sampling of the surface water and sediments in the golf course ponds did not identify concentrations of arsenic or dieldrin in excess of applicable standards. The proposed remedial strategy is to mitigate human health-based risks associated with the direct exposure to vadose zone arsenic and/or dieldrin contaminated soil. Remediation will be completed in accordance with FAC Chapter 62-780.680 for No Further Action (NFA)with Controls under Risk Management Option Level II(RM02).The areas of soil impacts will be rehabilitated by a combination of remedial approaches such as excavation/disposal and engineering controls including soil mixing, planters, limited access areas, parking lots and covering area with clean fill. Thomas Lumber,Orlando, Florida—Ms. Blackburn serves as the Engineer of record for this project that started with a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment that identified the historic presence of an UST on the Site. Phase I and Phase II ESA confirmed groundwater contamination. A SAR, including delineation of the groundwater impacts and testing of aquifer parameters, was conducted and approved by the OCEPD.Ms. Blackburn is preparing a RAP for the site. Pershing Area Remediation,Orlando,Florida—This project involved site assessment and preparation and implementation of an Interim Measures Work Plan for a chlorinated solvent contaminated site.Ms.Blackburn led our efforts to select a remedial contractor and then served as the engineer of record and managed field operations for the dewatering,excavation, soil load out and disposal and backfilling with clean soil and an amendment. In addition, she managed field operations during the In-Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO)injections that were conducted into areas located adjacent to the excavated area to facilitate groundwater clean-up. Atlantic Housing, Lakewood Pointe, Seffner, Florida— Project included monitoring of landfill generated gas and groundwater monitoring. Groundwater parameters included arsenic, benzo(a)pyrene, and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons. Ms. Blackburn is the senior engineer for the Lakewood Pointe project,Ms.Blackbum was the Engineer of Record for the Annual Director's Authorization Inspection Report for the permit.Ms.Blackburn's responsibilities include data gathering and documentation on a historic solid waste disposal area, and inspections including certification that the facility and system of treatment, monitoring, control and related appurtenances were maintained, in good repair,and were properly functioning. Flormari Blackburn, P.E. Page 2 Seminole County General Environmental Services, Seminole County, Florida—Ms. Blackburn is the senior engineer on the several of the recent projects we have completed in Seminole County. These include Rolling Hills golf course, where she was a reviewer of the Phase I ESA and primary preparer of the Phase II ESA proposal; and the Evolution Auto property where she again was the primary author of the Phase I ESA. Ms. Blackburn is the Engineer of record for the Site Assessment Report E Sciences recently competed at the former Cumberland farms site in Casselberry and the Flaming Arrow Court Source removal in Fem Park. Phase I and Phase II Assessments Associated with the Purchase or Redevelopment of Multiple Properties, City of Sanford, Seminole County, Florida—As part of the Seminole County General Environmental Services contract, Ms. Blackburn is the senior engineer for the Seminole County Sports Complex.Her role was to provide oversite on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessments(ESAs)and to assist with scope development and report preparation for the Phase II ESA tasks of these orange groves that were historically developed with celery fields. Minor soil impacts were identified and Ms. Blackburn provided oversite to the source removal (excavation and disposal) that was completed. For the Five Points project, Ms. Blackburn conducted the Site visit with Seminole County personnel, let the historical research effort and was the lead author of the report.In addition,Ms.Blackburn prepared a Phase II assessment proposal to address the numerous Recognized Environmental Conditions(RECs)identified. Orange County Fire Station#20 Remedial Action Plan Implementation, Orange County, Florida—Ms. Blackburn serves as the engineer of record for the remedial effort that includes ISCO injection over a large groundwater plume located in northwest Orange County. Ms. Blackburn is responsible for all technical aspects of the project including:developing a Site Specific Health and Safety Plan; selection of injection locations and ISCO concentrations, interactions with neighbors in the area, and interested by standers, and quarterly groundwater monitoring. Project Budget/Fees:$350,000. Orange County Risk Assessment Continuing Services Contract, Orange County, Florida — For the Orange County Fleet Services task, Ms. Blackburn was the Engineer of Record for the Engineering Control Documents for a No Further Action with conditions remedial strategy. Responsibilities included certifying that the engineering controls were adequate in order to effectively cover the previously identified areas of soil contamination located beneath the building slab. GEO Group,Various Locations,United States—Ms.Blackburn was project and client manager for services throughout the United States, including: Environmental Assessment, Phase I and II ESAs, remediation, NEPA compliance for the Bureau of Prisons, property condition surveys, asbestos surveys, and radon assessments. Locations included Aurora, Colorado; Hinton, Oklahoma; Ballwin,Michigan;Pecos,Texas;Jamaica,New York;Lovejoy,Georgia;Jena,Louisiana;McFarland,California;Adelanto,California; Tacoma,Washington; Hobbs, New Mexico;and Hudson,Colorado. Environmental Baseline Surveys and Environmental Assessment,Military Housing Privatization Initiative,Patrick Air Force Base, Florida — Ms. Blackburn was project manager for performing Environmental Baseline Surveys (EBS)/Environmental Assessments(EA)for this Military Housing Privatization Initiative(MHPI).In support of the planned privatization of the 141 acre base housing site at Patrick Air Force Base(PAFB),an EBS/EA evaluation and report was prepared.The overall objective was to satisfy the responsibilities of the U.S.Air Force under the NEPA and other environmental laws,regulations,and Air Force Instructions(AFIs) applicable to real property transactions. The revitalization accomplished as part of this transaction consisted of a combination of renovation of existing housing and demolition of selected housing. The EA analyzed the potential environmental impacts of these activities on human health and the environment. Coca Cola Bottling Company,Various Locations,Florida—Ms.Blackburn was project manager for environmental work including arsenic site assessments at the Dundee Florida plant,and Phase I and Phase II ESAs throughout the State of Florida. Bank of America,Various Locations,Florida—Ms. Blackburn was project manager for various locations of throughout the State of Florida providing Phase II site assessments,including vapor intrusion.Contaminants of concerns included < <scl ces ENGINEERING ces ENVIRONMENTAL Jennifer Marie Savaro ECOLOGICAL Scientist Ms. Savaro is a staff scientist with over five years of experience,specializing in natural resource assessments, contamination assessment and permitting. She Education provides upland habiat assessments,marine and estuarine habitat assessments MS, Marine Biology and Coastal Zone and permitting, conducts soil and groundwater sampling, GPS data collection Management, Oceanographic Center. and GIS mapping. Nova Southeastern University(2015) Project Experience BS, Marine Science, Marine Biology City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, specialization, Environmental Science Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida — Green Waste Facility minor, Marine Science Department, Evaluation: E Sciences provided additional surface water sampling activities Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC associated with the process of pursuing regulatory closure of the site at Miami (2011) Beach Golf Course. Ms. Savaro conducted four irrigation water sampling Professional Licenses/Certifications events. Miami Beach Fleet Management Facility: E Sciences provided American Academy of Underwater assessment activities associated with interim groundwater monitoring Sciences(AAUS)Scientific Diver associated with a historic petroleum leak from an underground storage tank.A Dive Master(NAUI) discharge associated with the presence of synthetic oil was discovered based on the presence of free floating product in an onsite monitoring well. Certified Arborist(ISA) groundwater monitoring events were conducted quarterly.Ms.Savaro assisted FWC Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent with the groundwater monitoring.City of Miami Beach Tree Inventory,Phase OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER 3 and 4: E Sciences is providing tree inventory services for the City of Miami Years of Experience Beach. Ms. Savaro performed GPS data collection, tree assessment and measurement and maintenance recommendations. Emergency Surface 5 Water Bacteria Sampling: E Sciences was responsible for collecting surface water quality samples for bacteriological testing on an emergency basis for the City of Miami Beach.This sampling was necessary to due to a sewer line break. Ms. Savaro role was to coordinate with the City of Miami Beach and collect the surface water samples. 81st Street Kayak Launch: E Sciences is providing permitting support for 81st Street Kayak Launch project in Miami Beach, Florida. Ms.Savaro assisted with the benthic survey and preparing the Natural Resources Assessment Report and permit applications. Parkview Island Park Kayak Launch: E Sciences is providing permitting support for the Parkview Island Park kayak Launch project in Miami Beach. Ms. Savaro conducted a seagrass survey for a proposed kayak launch at Parkview Island Park and assisted with permitting. Ruck's Park/Former Pioneer Gardens City of North Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida—E Sciences is assisting the City of North Miami with ongoing assessment and related activities for the Former Ruck's Park/Pioneer Gardens property. Soil and groundwater contamination was previously identified in numerous sample locations. E Sciences submitted a sampling plan to establish the groundwater conditions at the property boundary to develop a remedial strategy that would be coordinated with site redevelopment. Ms. Savaro conducted monitoring well installation oversight and conducted groundwater sampling. ISD Vacant SD Vacant Lot Site Assessment, Miami Gardens, Miami-Dade County, Florida — E Sciences conducted environmental sampling and regulatory reporting to complete a full site assessment at a vacant property owned by Miami-Dade County under the Brownfield Assessment Grant awarded to the TCRPC. Ms. Savaro conducted groundwater and methane sampling. Level II Assessment NEC NW 10, HNB Corporation, Miami-Dade County, Florida—E Sciences conducted environmental assessment activities at the vacant property to assist MDX on due diligence prior of purchase of the property as part of a corridor improvement project. Ms. Savaro conducted groundwater sampling and to prepared GIS figures. Taylor Park, City of North Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida—E Sciences is providing design criteria professional services associated with the remediation of the Taylor Park site.This included conducting site visits to locate and document the integrity of each monitoring well and methane probe,as well as conduct methane and groundwater sampling actives. Ms. Savaro assisted with the location of the monitoring wells and groundwater sampling. r-:"' - ENGINEERING Jr- Sciences ENVIRONMENTAL Joshua L. Stocker ECOLOGICAL Staff Scientist Josh Stocker is a staff scientist with over three years of experience providing support in field investigations,environmental site sampling, Phase I ESAs,and Education stormwater inspections. M.S., Marine Environmental Science and Coastal Zone Management, Nova Project Experience Southeastern University Oceanographic City of Miami Miscellaneous Environmental Engineering Services, City Center, 2016 of Miami, Florida — Grapeland Park Site Assessment Activities: E B.S., Biology and Environmental Science, Sciences conducted monitoring well installation, soil sampling, and King's College, 2011 groundwater monitoring activities to support site assessment efforts at Grapeland Park. The assessment data will be used to support conditional Professional Licenses 1 Certifications closure of the site for the City of Miami. Mr. Stocker assisted with monitoring PADI Open Water, Advance, Enriched Air well installation activities, and conducted the soil sampling and groundwater (EANX),and Rescue Diver Certified monitoring activities. Douglas Park Well Installation and Sampling: E AAUS diver Sciences conducted groundwater monitoring well installation and monitoring OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER activities to support the site assessment efforts at Douglas Park. The assessment data will be used to support conditional closure of the site for Years of Experience the City of Miami. Mr. Stocker conducted the groundwater monitoring 3 activities. Engineering Control Inspections: E Sciences conducted inspections of installed Engineering Controls in eleven city parks to observe the control conditions and integrity in accordance with the Engineering Control Maintenance Plans. Mr. Stocker conducted the Engineering Control inspections and assisted with the Engineering Control Inspection Reports for submittal to Miami-Dade County DERM. City of Miami Beach Environmental Engineering Continuing Services, Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida — Miami Beach Fleet Management Facility: E Sciences provided assessment activities associated with interim groundwater monitoring associated with a historic petroleum leak from an underground storage tank. A discharge associated with the presence of synthetic oil was discovered based on the presence of free floating product in an onsite monitoring well. groundwater monitoring events were conducted quarterly. Mr. Stocker assisted with the groundwater monitoring. Normandy Shores Groundwater Monitoring: E Sciences conducted groundwater monitoring to support a monitoring only plan implemented at the site for the presence of arsenic impacts at an active golf course in the City. Mr. Stocker conducted the groundwater sampling activities and assisted with the quarterly reports. North Miami Environmental Engineering Continuing Services– Rucks Park, City of North Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida—E Sciences is assisting the City of North Miami with on-going assessment and related activities for the Former Ruck's Park/Pioneer Gardens property. Soil and groundwater contamination was previously identified in numerous sample locations. E Sciences submitted a sampling plan to establish the groundwater conditions throughout the property to develop a remedial strategy that would be coordinated with site redevelopment. Mr. Stockers role was to oversee monitoring well installation, conduct groundwater well and soil sampling, and assist with report writing. Beach Corridor Rapid Transit, Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works, Miami-Dade County, Florida—E Sciences is a subconsultant on this project. This project is an approximately 13-mile corridor that extends from the Miami Design District to Government Center, eastbound along 1-395 to Miami Beach and north to the Miami Beach Convention Center. Several alternatives are being evaluated to provide a rapid transit solution. Funding agencies include the Federal Transit Agency, FDOT, Miami-Dade County and the Cities of Miami and Miami Beach. Mr. Stocker assisted with drafting the Preliminary Environmental Discussion report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD), Miami-Dade County, Florida— E Sciences conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of approximately two miles of public right of way corridor for the installation of a new 60-inch transmission force main in Miami-Dade County for WASD. Mr. Stocker conducted the Phase I Assessment. Tab 3 Approach & Methodology ,,,_.,,_„ Q. -0 Sciences r 6.00, ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGICAL City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Tab 3 Approach and Methodology The City's commitment to its community requires planning for potential environmental impacts and managing environmental issues as they arise.At E Sciences,we embrace the role of the environmental consultant to support the City and its consultants in providing a coordinated and broad approach to addressing the environmental issues and risks that must be managed as part of the process. We keep in mind the overall goals of each project as we work through the details necessary to satisfy your needs. 3.1 Approach and Methodology Our understanding of the City's needs is based upon our experience with this project and similar projects for the City, .0,r''`"' • local knowledge and experience with similar projects for g P ■ other public sector clients. v'ir .. � +� - ?tem S• r Our approach is based upon the following tenets: Ttrr-, .. ■ • Efficient use of existing information to reduce cost , and compress the schedule ; Pim rimpner • Using the Brownfields program to fund the activities 1 ='i " — _` ^ �'1 ► `- t conducted under this contract ' .iii . _ - t.• • • Application of regulatory strategies and tools that are �_ available using regulatory policies and technical documents • Proactive communications with DERM to reduce the iterative nature of assessment and regulatory involvement • Implementation of engineering and institutional controls to keep the public safe and substantially reduce remediation requirements • Effective and on-going management of existing contamination by establishing a program for leaving soils in place and programmatic approach to managing contaminated materials during future construction activities The following paragraphs highlight our approach and methodology that have proven to be successful and will be the basis for our approach. Technical Approach As City staff is aware, the area that needs to be assessed extends beyond the footprint of the convention center property and onto the adjacent parcels. The assessment that DERM is expecting the City to conduct incorporates the entire area of the former golf course. The golf course operated between Meridian Avenue, Washington Avenue, 17th Street and Dade Boulevard. However,as a practical matter,our approach is to substantially reduce the area that will be assessed by implementing the following strategy. ( � Q•, Tab 3 Approach and Methodology-Page 3-1 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center E Sciences will compile the following existing data: • Soil and groundwater assessment conducted by E Sciences and Geosyntec for the convention center renovation project; • Dewatering locations and laboratory analysis conducted for both the renovation project and the FPL duct bank project conducted along 17th Street; • Locations of engineering controls installed(or will be installed)as part of the renovation; • Areas where soils were excavated as part of the renovation;and • Locations of impervious surfaces that may act as an existing engineering control(buildings,asphalt parking,etc.). This information would be incorporated into a map and narrative to be used as a basis for a sampling plan. Sampling would be focused in the following areas: • Areas that are unassessed and pervious;and • Areas that are adjacent to property boundaries where existing data shows that there is a potential for contamination migration outside the footprint of the former golf course. Our intention with the map would be to show DERM that much of the area has been assessed and is under engineering controls and to propose sampling in areas that remain unassessed, are suspected of having contamination and have exposure potential. This information would be incorporated into a PowerPoint presentation that would outline the sampling rationale. We would present the plan to DERM in person. Using this data and with their input, we would prepare a sampling plan and approach for DERM's formal review and comment.This plan would define the"site"as the former golf course area and adjacent City-owned property so that it if contamination does extend beyond the golf course, but on City-owned property, the impacts will not be considered to be"off-site". Luckily,the extent of historic golf course is located within City-owned property. This is important because it eliminates the need for Actual Notice of off- site contamination and more easily facilitates the documentation for regulatory closures. We would also propose to use Miami-Dade County's background concentrations as alternative cleanup target levels, as applicable, as our regulatory standard to raise the cleanup target levels. Our preliminary analysis reveals the following (see map on page 3-3): • A large part of the area is covered by the convention center improvements (building and paved parking). We do not propose to conduct testing on this main parcel but will evaluate the results of the dewatering effluent monitoring for projects conducted adjacent to the convention center to evaluate if groundwater impacts were documented. If prudent, we would propose to install monitoring wells along Washington Avenue to ensure that contamination is not migrating east from beneath the convention center building. If no contamination was documented,we would use that data to justify no further groundwater sampling. • The City agreed to incorporate engineering controls into the area north of the convention center building and south of Dade Boulevard (historically known as Site B and the 21st Street Community Center/Bandshell). E Sciences conducted soil and groundwater assessment. Soil impacts were identified but should be addressed by the engineering controls. One location of groundwater sampling showed arsenic concentrations above the GCTL. We propose to conduct groundwater assessment at that the northern and western boundaries to delineate the groundwater plume and to conduct no additional soil assessment. :7 s.„312 , Tab 3 Approach and Methodology—Page 3-2 il City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testin' o Soi4and,Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center i • The City also agreed to •incorporate engineering `>•` i c /- 'd tt `� s.� '� • j controls into the area that was ,' ' ' ;'- � � • ''<111 , i a.,...;•...*—,., ••r; i-. a eau''•""- ,'.....1.... L'i; �;� part of the expansion west of - , --..• • -, r!F site a 21s1 t., • ,. JT Convention Center Drive � _ o / Community Center 11 t�_� ' ^` O Bandstand t , (historically known as Site A ,''' , and West Parking Lot). , fr , �,.- ` � ,,;.r 1 a Groundwater sampling ' `f; :• . . 'Ii , i f •1, t conducted on this parcel by / 1 `., 2 " 'r� .`fijit , both E Sciences and others s. ' I ++r • did not identify groundwater `r , i t . 10—, "� impacts. Soil impacts are to be T ► V. ZL. .y addressed by the engineering • , t r,,nver Ce^ter Budding 1 t control. No additional ; al, I :~ '' assessment is proposed for .. ' 4 z I ' this area. • • . ' �Z i lit i. WI • We have already assessed the `' 1-j,": � :• T.� '' ' se western parcel located south '" `, - ,,fit '-- Ill V • • ;• I '' .- Ji. y of the convention center ••- �, �-arr • building (historically known as 11 " t rM 6. I. Y 1 ti, p1 I „�„� C;1'Hall ., :rl ..:a' � . the Convention Center �t I' •., .. 1..1., low, , ... .ir Headquarter Hotel property). -- - • Soils exhibited elevated •vs: 17:1 Previous Miami Beach Muniapal Gdf Course Limas concentrations of arsenic and ,l �Documented Area of Impact ' � nitrate concentrations were um Proposed Soil Sampling i Convention Center ME Proposed Sal and Groundwater Sampling Headquarters Hotel" .�� identified above the — Prey ale. 1 =Site&21st Street Community CenlertBandsheN �._ . _ groundwater cleanup target Qsite a west Parlong Lot-No Proposed Samping '1 -._2 =rl i level. The nitrate exceedances =Convention Center Headquarter Hotel Property D � 1 a Q City Hall ti were confirmed by others. The FlmoreTheatre 0 137.5 275 550 , property is mostly paved, with �BotanicalGarden Ii - Feet landscaping in islands and around the edges. We propose to conduct soil and groundwater sampling at the southem edge of the property (which corresponds with the southern boundary of the former golf course) to confirm the southern boundary conditions. • The botanical garden represents the northwest corner of the former golf course area. We would propose to collect soil and groundwater samples on that property, along the edge of the outline of the former golf course to establish the boundary conditions on this property as we are not aware of any testing has been conducted in that area. • The City Hall parcel is located on the southwestern corner of the former golf course. No testing has been conducted on this property.Therefore, we would conduct soil and groundwater testing on the south and western perimeter of this lot to evaluate its boundary conditions. • Finally, the southeastern corner of the former golf course is occupied by the Fillmore Theatre. No assessment has been conducted on that property to our knowledge. Therefore, soil and groundwater assessment would be proposed along the south and eastern perimeter to establish those boundary conditions. I�, Tab 3 Approach and Methodology—Page 3-3 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center Based upon the findings of the proposed testing above, we may recommend additional sampling to delineate and define the limits of soil or groundwater impacts. Once the assessment is complete, we would expand upon the soil management plan and health and safety plan that was prepared by Kimley Horn. We would prepare an addendum to address future disturbance of soils within the areas documented to have contamination. Amending an existing document that was developed for the convention center renovation and approved by DERM is an approach that we can use to expedite the review process and keep costs down on the project. So, in lieu of active remediation,the amended plan would incorporate the following: • Provisions for future capital improvement projects will be developed to ensure that whether excavation work in areas of contamination is being conducted by City staff or contractors, general, but clear, instruction on management of hazards,soil segregation, handling, stockpiling and disposal requirements will be in place. • A generic dewatering plan would be developed for projects within 500 to 1.000 feet of the groundwater contamination. We would negotiate the appropriate distance with the South Florida Water Management District. FDOT has one for their projects and we have prepared addenda for design build project. Having this generic permit eases the burden on contractors and consultants when they have known dewatering projects coming up. Contractors will still need to submit a dewatering plan, but this should streamline the permitting process. • Engineering Control Plans will be developed in areas where potential exposure to contamination in pervious areas is a concern. It is possible that installation of the engineering controls may require some source removal so provisions for this will also be dictated as part of this plan. • Should groundwater impacts be observed to have migrated off of City-owned property, then more proactive remedial measures may be necessary. But based upon the results of the assessment thus far, it is our opinion that it is reasonable to expect that groundwater impacts are localized on-site. Finally,we would assist the City with developing a restrictive covenant for the site so that conditional regulatory closure may be sought. Likely conditions would be restrictions on land use to commercial/government use and on groundwater use. If contract bidding and administration are necessary, we have experience in designing remediation as part of the construction and as a stand-alone project. We can prepare the technical and bidding documents associated with the advertisement, respond to requests for information to support addenda during the bidding process, conduct pre-bid meetings and manage the contractor selection process. We can also assist with contract negotiations, conduct the preconstruction meeting, perform compliance inspections, review request for pay items and prepare the final certification documents and as-built plans. Cost Savings Approach We intend to use as much of the existing data as we can. We have reviewed the other consultant information and are prepared to rely on it so the City will not have to compensate us to duplicate work that has already been accomplished. We will collaborate with DERM to seek a mutually agreeable assessment plan prior to conducting additional testing.As previously stated, the sampling plan would incorporate existing data and a rationale for future testing locations, test methods and sampling methodologies. This should assist in reducing the number of sampling iterations that will be required by DERM and the number of deliverables that are developed.We propose that the City consider allowing us to meet with DERM upon receipt of laboratory data and prior to preparing assessment reports. During that meeting, we would seek consensus on additional testing if warranted, request an extension on deliverable submittal and have the benefit of conducting that additional testing prior to submitting assessment reports. �' • Tab 3 Approach and Methodology—Page 3-4 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center The Benefit of Brownfields E Sciences suggests that the City consider the benefit of designating the former golf course area as a Brownfield in 2018.The City would need to accomplish two things by the end of the year: • Adopt a resolution designating the area as a Brownfield; and • . Enter into a Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement(BSRA)with the State. Ms. Locke is a past president of the Florida Brownfields Association and is available to assist the City is working through these administrative functions and realize the benefits of the program: • Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits can be issued for 50% of eligible assessment and cleanup costs annually and is also a 25% credit when cleanup is complete. While this applies to corporate income tax, there is a market for these to be brokered and sold. Also, several municipalities use these very desirable tax credits to compensate contractors instead of payment of funds. Either, way this provides a way for the City to fund 75% of the assessment and remedial activities required by the state rules. • The City would use Chapter 62-780 of the Florida Administrative Code instead of Miami-Dade County Chapter 24 as the governing code for assessment and cleanup. The state code provides flexibility that is not available to the City through the County Code. • The regulatory agencies provide expedited review of technical documents submitted. This will help expedite the project. • DERM cannot charge a review fee for review of technical documents under this Program. • There are cleanup liability protections built into the BSRA that would benefit the City. BK0vao DEEV PMENT IS RE IZI NG COMMUNITIES scier ces - We Work In A Brownfield Every Day. 1 , Tab 3 Approach and Methodology—Page 3-5 City of Miami Beach RFQ 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center 3.2 Workload and Technical Capabilities E Sciences'staff are involved in several projects where schedules are projected over several years. The pace of these projects and current workload commitments allow the Project Manager and E Sciences' staff to provide ample and immediate availability to the City over the term of this contract. Based on current and projected workload for our personnel, the graph below represents E Sciences' availability to serve the City over the next 12 months, assuming a contract start date of June 2018: 100% - , _ _ _ _ _ ••= • 0 4 4 90% f ' I ' ll 80% 11111 700° 11111 60% , 1 1 1 1 1 1 50% -,1 I 1 1 1 — — c%Available ■%Committed 400/0 111111 30% ' I1111111I 20% �, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10% 11111111111 June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May E Sciences is excited about the opportunity to continue to work on this project.As such, we commit to you that we will dedicate our Project Manager, Ms. Locke to the project to keep it moving and on-track. She is currently winding down three of her larger projects within the next two to six months. Each of those are long term transportation and transit projects that are coming to an end. Ms. Paituvi and Ms. Locke work interchangeably on so many projects that it allows them to keep their projects moving forward. They are supported by a group of dedicated staff of scientists and engineers who are dedicated to staff and project level work and are very familiar with the City. This is an important project to us and we hope to be able to complete it through regulatory closure. We now have a professional drone and our scientists have become certified as pilots. We can use the drone on this project to identify sample locations and constraints on off-site properties if that is necessary. E Sciences maintains typical contamination assessment equipment such as water quality meters, turbidity meters, Van Dorn samplers, hand augers, and pumps. We also own innovative field screening instruments, such as our Color-Tec equipment. This is a field based analytical method that combines gas detector tubes with a hand pump to detect low levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater. This is a useful tool when evaluating properties for volatile contaminants that may not be detected at low levels by flame ionization detectors or photo ionization detectors. We have used Color- Tec successfully at two chlorinated solvent sites in conjunction with direct push technology to bring real time results in the field without the expense of a mobile laboratory.Although this may not be used on this project, if the need arises, it is a readily available tool. ., Tab 3 Approach and Methodology—Page 3-6 (- 11rj Sc ces ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL ECOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Orlando 34 E.Pine Street,Orlando,FL 32801 (407)481-9006 Tel I (407)481-9627 Fax Fort Lauderdale 224 SE 9th Street,Fort Lauderdale,FL 33316 (954)484-8500 Tel I (954)484-5146 Fax Miami 111 NE 1st Street,Suite 906,Miami,FL 33132 (786)517-2632 Tel I (305)397-1556 Fax DeLand 0� ❑� 116 Indiana Avenue,DeLand,FL 32724 (386)734-1950 Tel I (386)734.1952 Fax ''+ El. . www.esciencesinc.com ATTACHMENT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX E C4.. MAM BEACH Insurance Requirements 2018-027-WG Geotechnical Engineering and Laboratory Testing of Soil and Groundwater for the Miami Beach Convention Center PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018-027-WG 31