Loading...
94-21324 ResoRESOLUTION NO. 94~21324 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING RECOMMENDATIONS ON ISSUES CONCERNING THE PROPOSED MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY/ MIAMI BEACH SEGMENT OF THE EAST-WEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR FOR PRESENTATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AS THE OFFICIAL CITY POSITION. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has requested that Miami Beach officially express its position regarding the MacArthur Causeway/Miami Beach segment of the proposed East-West Transit Corridor project; and WHEREAS, the official Miami Beach participation will allow FDOT to include the MacArthur Causeway/Miami Beach line in the preliminary plans for the East-West Transit Corridor, which will be submitted for Federal funding consideration at the upcoming funding cycle; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 1994, certain consensus recommendations were formulated jointly by the City of Miami Beach Transportation and Parking Committee, the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce Transportation and Parking Committee, the East-West Corridor Citizens Advisory Committee, as well as other community leaders; and WHEREAS, at the September 12, 1994 City Commission Workshop on Transportation, this unified community position was reviewed by City representatives. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, That the following statements on issues concerning the MacArthur Causeway/ Miami Beach segment of the East-West Transit Corridor project be accepted and adopted as the official position of the City of Miami Beach, Florida: Section 1. CONNECTION OF CORRIDOR The Miami Beach line is presently viewed by the consultants and FDOT staffs as a separate line of the East-West Transit Corridor that would interconnect with the main line (Airport-Seaport) at the Freedom Tower area (5th Street and Biscayne Boulevard in Downtown Miami). The following issues were explored but it was felt that more information was needed: (a) The opportunity to connect directly to the main East-West line in order for the Miami Beach line to access the Airport, Downtown Miami, and the Seaport without the necessity of a transfer. However, as current market studies are insufficient to demonstrate demand, prioritization of one access over the other is yet to be determined by the City Commission. (b) Easy connections with the Downtown People Mover as well as Metrorail should be provided, (c) To facilitate the connection with Metrorail, a continuation of the Miami Beach line beyond Freedom Tower via Biscayne Boulevard and Flagler Street to Government Center should be explored. Section 2. TECHNOLOGY (a) The MacArthur Causeway/Miami Beach system should feature the newest available technology. The search for new technology should be a continued and purposeful effort. (b) Vehicles that could run both on the higher and lower speed lines should be explored. (c) The vehicles should be aesthetically sensitive and pleasing, user friendly and Iow impact. Section 3. CONNECTION TO THE BEACH (a) The MacArthur Causeway should be the selected route. The crossing should be made on the south side of the Causeway on Iow level pilings, no higher than the existing Jersey barrier. (b) The MacArthur Causeway median approach is not selected because it would eliminate the present landscaping, narrow both the travel lanes and shoulders, and conflict with left turn movements to the islands. (c) No stops should be provided along the Miami Beach portion of the Causeway. Section 4. THE BEACH CIRCULATION SYSTEM The following issues were explored but it was felt that more information is needed in order to make specific decisions: (a) A two-way, bi-directional loop running on 1st Street, Washington Avenue, 17th Street and Alton Road. (b) Loading platforms designed in a sensitive manner which fits with the Art Deco character of Miami Beach. (c) The preservation of on-street parking/loading zones on the loop route, wherever feasible. Where not feasible, the project should provide for the construction of replacement, off-street parking structures. (d) The provision of park-and-ride facility(ies) to serve commuter needs. (e) (f) (g) (h) Section 5. (a) (b) (c) (d) The development of a strong mitigation program to deal with impacts to the business community during construction is felt to be imperative. FDOT should support a Miami Beach application to the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the development of an interim busway system that would run special buses in a dedicated right of way, on this loop and into downtown Miami, to test the loop's ridership potential. Preparation of an economic impact analysis to determine the transportation system's feasibility should be initiated. Continued community involvement throughout the planning and development processes is requested MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED INCLUDE Longer hours of operation, possibly through 5:00 a.m., should be considered to reduce traffic congestion in the Historic Art Deco District due to night life activities. Intensive policing of the system is a major contributor to riders' safety and the cost should be factored in economic feasibility analysis. Marketing of the Miami Beach system should be done with the South Beach Transportation Management Association (SoBe TMA). The Beach circulation system should be conceived in the context of a comprehensive transportation and parking plan (to be developed by the City) which takes into account new development patterns, roadway improvements, and circulation/parking demands. PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd ATTEST: alj day of September , 1994. I-ORM APPROVED LEGAL DEPT. ,':T CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DR.I. VE MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA 33139 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. Mayor Seymour Gelber and DATE: September 22, 1994 Members of the City Commission Roger M. Cad~~ City Manager A RESOLUTION-OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING RECOMMENDATIONS ON KEY ISSUES CONCERNING THE PROPOSED MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY/MIAMI BEACH SEGMENT OF THE EAST-WEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR FOR PRESENTATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AS THE OFFICIAL CITY POSITION. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that Miami Beach preserve its option of being included as an integral part of the proposed East-West Transit Corridor by adopting the attached Resolution which will convey to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) the official City position. The recommendations contained herein were formulated jointly by the City of Miami Beach Transportation and Parking Committee, the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce Transportation and Parking Committee, the East-West Corridor Citizens Advisory Committee, as well as other community leaders. The recommendations were also the subject of a recent City Commission Workshop on Transportation. FDOT has held twenty (20) official meetings in Miami Beach regarding our segment of the proposed East-West Corridor. Based on the input to date, the Administration developed a summary of key issues and recommendations concerning the MacArthur Causeway/Miami Beach segment. On Friday, September 9, 1994, the Administration convened a meeting of the three citizen committees involved with the East-West Transit Corridor project, as well as other community leaders who jc~intly discussed these issues of importance to our City, reached a consensus, and formulated a unified community position for presentation to the City Commission. Attached is the meeting roster. On Monday, September 12, 1994 the City Commission reviewed the community position and made the recommendations contained in the attached Resolution. In attendance were Vice Mayor Liebman and Commissioners Gottlieb, Pearlson, and Shapiro. AGENDAITEM DATE Overall, there was a consensus at both meetings that Miami Beach needs to be a part of th~ East-West Transit Corridor but that there is not yet sufficient information available to make some specific, detailed decisions regarding the Beach circulation system. Therefore, the recommendations the City Commission is being asked to make are designed to give the City maximum flexibility to consider the details, as new technology becomes available and the community further understands the issues. As fully stated in the Resolution, key issues were explored and consensus recommendations were formulated regarding the following broad categories: 1. Connection of Corridor (Miami Roach line/Airport-Seaport line); 2. Technology; 3. Connection to Miami Beach via MacArthur Causeway; and 4. Miami Beach Circulation System. The present issue for Miami Beach is not whether light rail (or other technology) will work, but how it can fit into the fabric of the community. However, the rail option should be preserved for now in order for Miami Beach to be included in the Corridor's preliminary plan and funding application. If included, our goal over the next years should be to decide whether light rail transit (or other state-of-the-art transit technology) is compatible with the scale and character of our City. Light rail systems, once known as trolleys, ran in virtually every city in the United States, including Miami Beach until the 1930's. They were successful systems then, and the revival of light rail has been successful now in virtually every city where it has recently been incorporated. Approval of the Resolution by the City Commission would allow FDOT and its consultants to include the MacArthur Causeway/Miami Beach line in the preliminary plans for the East-West Transit Corridor, which will be submitted for funding consideration by the Federal government at the upcoming funding cycle. It is important to note that, even if funding is approved, Miami Beach will still retain the right to withdraw from the project altogether. RMC/aj MIAMI DESIGN PRESERVATION LEAGUE ~ C~ClCE ~IN L MIFIM/8~:P~H. FLC~II~133119 (~OS) 672-L)014 ~ (~05) 672-4319 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayor and City Commissioners Betty Gu~err,,ez, Chairmen of re Board September 9, 1994 EAST-WEST CORRIDOR As the City is currently grappling with transportation issues, MDPL would lille to go on record in strong supl:~xt of the East-West Corridor. The following resolution outlines our desires and concerns, including the need for a Comprehensive City-Wide Transportation Pbn. CC: Roger Cadton, City Manager Ham/Mavrogcnes, Assistant City Manager Amelia Johnson, Transportation Coordinator AGENDA ITEH~. DATE MIAMI DESIGN PRESERVATION LEAGUE POST c~qCE ~IN L ~ 8EP~O'I. FLC~IDfl $3119 (305) 672-2014 FRX (305) 672-4319 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS September 9, 1994 T~e Miami Design Presen,'ation League supports the development oF the Fast-West Corridor public transport project linking the Miami Beach Architectural Historic Dislrict with Downtown Miami, existing rail lines, the Airport, Seaport and West Dada. Because attractive, dependable public ~'ansport is essential in the continuing effort to improve the quality of Fife in the Historic Art Deco District and because South Miami Beach was originally developed at a time when streetcars were a primary mode of transportation, MDPL believes that the East-West Corridor must have a high priority. While the need for such transit improvements are largely due to the success and popularity of the Historic Art Deco District, MDPL believes that such improvements must nOl compromise the integrity Of the Historic District. MDPL believes that critical to the acceptance and success of the Miami Beach portion cd: the Fast-West Corridor are: The tailoring of the system to the needs of Miami Beach residents first, Dada County residents second, and tourists third. A community-based construction mitigation program for all areas that may be affected, particularly the Washington Avenue Business District. -' Not more than one change of mode between Miami Beach and the Airport, Seaport, Metromover and existing Metrorail. The use '~f an aesthetically appropriate, unobtrusive system and the Flexibility oF the system to allow the use of historic Miami Beach s~eetcar replicas. The development of a comprehensive Transportation an-d Parking' Plan linking public transit to parking facilities at the periphery of the Historic DistricL Such a plan must include an effective signage and roadway improvement program directing automobile tra~c into such parking facilities before reaching the Historic District. A system that retains on-street parallel parking and loading zones on affected streets, particularly Washington Avenue. A City of Miami Beach-driven effort to extend the system to other areas, including the Alton Road/West Avenue Corridor, 41st Street, Mid Beach Hotels, and the North Beach/71st Street area. 8. A continuing public involvement pr~ram. CO#NECTIN PEOPLE Robert V. Robe~'tson Nick Seriannl Ed Colby 5775 Blue Lagoon Drive IEASTWEST CORRIDOR STUDY-MIAMIBEACHMEETINGS Aug 18 Aug 3 Aug 2 Jul 28 Jul 25 Jul 7 May 16 Apr 18 Apr 11 Mar 31 Mar 25 Mar 17 Mar 10 Mar 3 Feb 17 Feb 10 Jan 25 Jan 25 Jan 18 Jan 11, 1994 Dec 7, 1993 Nov 17 Oct 26 Joint Meeting So Pointe Advisory Committee & So Pointe Citizens' Coalition Public Meeting (advertised) SoBe TMA briefing Presentation before Miami Beach City Commission Citizens Advisory Board - Miami Beach Segment City Manager's executive staff Citizens Advisory Board - Miami Beach Segment City of Miami Beach & MBCC Joint Committee on Transportation North Beach Development Corp briefing City of Miami Beach & MBCC Joint Committee on Transportation Meeting w/Roger Carlton South Pointe Advisory Board to Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency City of Miami Beach & MBCC Joint Committee on Transportation 2Consensus Building Workshop (advertised) 2Community Briefings (advertised, redundant sessions) 8 a.m., 3:30 p.m., 6 p.m. City of Miami Beach & MBCC Joint Committee on Transportation Miami Beach Hispanic Affairs Committee Historic Collins Avenue Association City of Miami Beach & MBCC Joint Committee on Transportation MBCC Board of Governors and MBCC Transportation Committee Community (Scoping) meeting (advertised) Presentation before Miami Beach City Commission Initial E-W team meeting with City Manager Roger Carlton ] Myriad of telephone conversations, one-on-one meetings and regular meetings of Chamber and City transportation committees are not listed. 2 Jointly sponsored by: Miami Beach Development Corporation, City of Miami Beach. City of Miami Beach Parking and Transportation Committee. Miami Design Preservation League. Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce, Ocean Drive Association, Lincoln Road Task Force. Historic Collins Avenue Association. Washington Avenue Association. South Pointe Advisory Board, and SoBe TMA ew\meeting, lst ~ Suite 390 - Miami. FL. 33126