Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agreement with Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc.
ao 03- 3 0 c3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CURTIS & ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC. i FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2018-141-ND DISCIPLINE: ARCHITECTURAL-LANDSCAPE RESOLUTION NO. 2018-30534 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 14 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 16 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 23 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 24 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 24 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 25 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 25 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 26 2 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A Consultant Service Order 30 SCHEDULE B Consultant Compensation 31 SCHEDULE C Hourly Billing Rate Schedule 32 SCHEDULE D Approved Subconsultants 33 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A Resolution & Commission Memorandum 34 ATTACHMENT B Request for Quailifications &Addendums 35 ATTACHMENT C Consultant's Response to the RFQ 36 3 - AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CURTIS & ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICESIIN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" JThis Agreement made and entered into this /S day of uhuC(L , 20 1 9 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc., a Florida corporation having its principal office at 7520 S. Red Road, Suite M, South Miami, FL. 33143 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 17, 2014, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2018-141-ND for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories On An "As-Needed-Basis" (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on October 17, 2018, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2018- 30534, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as'described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in 4 writing, by the Department Head, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City) as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. - CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those l authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Construction Documents are constructible, in 5 compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve-as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule "D", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. 6 CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project, prepared for the ' purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents..However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather(except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, 7 unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Project or scope of work. The estimated construction value shall be less than the amount established in Category 5, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently $325,000 or as amended by law) or for a planning or study activity shall not exceed the amount established in Category 2, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently $35,000 or as amended by law). Project Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement,-except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant Service Order. Schedule B— Consultant Compensation. Schedule C— Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule D --Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. 8 SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI) format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work"shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the Department Head. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the!Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A" hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved,and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation by Consultant to City that the Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient for its intended purposes. 9 The 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or, omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the•sole discretion of the City Manager(Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project(as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including, without limitation, City provided consultants (if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting 10 from untimely review taken by the City(or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment (i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, .technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work, (ii) or for the period of design liability.required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and any resulting deficient,defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24)from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, 11 1 1 � contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of-authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project ( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida,Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the 12 Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT,DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. 13 The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality; completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and. Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the 14 Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; 15 provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the Cityin the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST • 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost_Budget for the Project, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design 'the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the Basic Services, Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance,with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates, cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, unless otherwise specified in the Consultant Service Order or other written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%), then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the 16 City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of the Design Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications, Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto, represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry, provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared (or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any 17 required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents) within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%) of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, , extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which, if granted at all, shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and, if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and.absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget; (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project; (3) abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional_Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization _must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions.. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions 18 determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent .with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by,the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement: Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof, which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys. & Testing: Environmental_ investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). 19 Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the Not to Exceed".Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order. hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of 20 the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty(30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance,of this Agreement. Nothing. contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 21 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall bereleased from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure-period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the 'City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cosr is defined asthe difference between the actual costof completion of the Services, and the-cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant, for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in 22 • the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Servicessatisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required-insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Flo?ida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10% of the limit of liability. 11.2 The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business,in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida 23 resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions.by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the Cityin no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any 24 • such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement onlyif in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to:, City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter.Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 7520 S. Red Road, Suite M South Miami, FL. 33143 Tel: (305) 442-1774 Fax: N/A Email: aida@curtisrogers.com Attn: Aida M. Curtis 25 1 All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY.MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race,: color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submits bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on.leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicitor secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 26 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the • documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s) that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of 27 such party in respect to all covenants-of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such setvices for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. • 28. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF BEACH: 11111 CITY C RK MAYOR Attest CURTIS & ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC. 411# i/s2� ould G 9 Signa e/ _ r-tarYy Si9 nature/Presiderft � Qini i 0 ;0i3-4), re,e_ /6icIG M. a,{•I:s Print Name v Print Name ,4 0 10 INCORP +OR TA ED ''� • � � APPROVED AS TO • FORM &LANGUAGE •• \/- ,,Z, &FOR EXECUTION City Attorney IL.At, Date 29 r SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. _for Consulting Services. TO: Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 7520 S. Red Road, Suite M South Miami, FL. 33143 PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ 2018-141-ND) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: _ Days Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date': $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date . 1 Section 287.055,Florida Statutes,commonly known as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA),is applicable to the selection of professional services consultants(architecture,professional engineering,landscape architecture,or registered surveying and mapping)by public agencies for projects valued up to the amount established in Category 5,Section 287.017,Florida Statutes(currently$325,000 or as amended by law)or for a planning or study activity valued up to the amount established in Category 2,Section 287.017,Florida Statutes(currently$35,000 or as amended by law). 30 • SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXX)O(XXX Design Services* $XXX)OOOO( Bidding and Award Services $)0 )000(XX Construction Administration ** $XXXXX)OO( Reimbursable Allowance*** $) XX)OOOO( Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration servicesare required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall be at the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$X)O(XXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. • 31 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer(Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer $116.15 GIS Specialist $ 86.25 Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45 Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner . $116.15 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ( Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Engineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 . Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $. 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician $ 69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $116.15 Clerical $ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/ GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $170.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/ GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party of 4 w/ GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector(CEI) $103.50 Inspector(CEI, Field or $ 94.88 Construction) • 32 SCHEDULE D APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 33 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM _ 1 34 • RESOLUTION NO. 2018-30534 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2018-141-ND, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WILLIAM B. MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., CSA CENTRAL, INC., SCHINDLER ARCHITECTS, INC., TSAO DESIGN GROUP, INCORPORATED, CPH, INC., SOL-ARCH, INC.,WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT, INC., MOSS ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN GROUP, INC., ALLEGUEZ ARCHITECTURE, INC., R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, AND P.A., VITALINI CORAZZINI, P.A., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; , AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAVINO & MILLER DESIGN STUDIO, P.A., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., CPH, INC., CURTIS & ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC., CHEN-MOORE ASSOCIATES, AND MILLER, LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., CES CONSULTANTS, INC., CHEN-MOORE ASSOCIATES, 305 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC, MILLER, LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND SRS ENGINEERING, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH E SCIENCES, INC., TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC., EBS ENGINEERING, INC., AND CSA CENTRAL, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL • SERVICES AND TESTING ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CSA CENTRAL, INC., 3FM ENGINEERING, INC., AND UCI ENGINEERING INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH 305 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC, EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP.COMPANY, CES CONSULTANTS, INC., MASTER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., UCI • ENGINEERING INC., AND DIAZ, CARRENO, SCOTTI & PARTNERS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TSAO DESIGN GROUP, INCORPORATED, AND MC DESIGNERS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERIOR DESIGN 1 SPACE PLANNING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF SURVEYING; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH EACH OF THE RECOMMENDED PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on February 14, 2018, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2018-141-ND for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Repair and Replacement Projects; and WHEREAS, Request for Qualifications No.,2018-141-ND (the "RFQ") was released on February 15, 2018; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on February 27, 2018; and WHEREAS,on May 7, 2018, the City received thirty-seven (37) proposals; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2018 the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 105-2018, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), consisting of the following individuals: Lily Alvarez, Construction Manager, Property Management Department, City of Miami Beach; Pilar Caurin, Construction Manager, Office of Capital Improvement Projects, City of Miami Beach; Elizabeth Estevez, Parks and Capital Projects Manager, Parks and Recreation Department, City of Miami Beach; and Francisco Garcia, Construction Manager, Property Management Department, City of Miami Beach;and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on August 6, 2018 to review and score the remaining proposals; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of General Architecture was as follows: William B. Medellin Architect P.A., as the first ranked proposer; CSA Central, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; Schindler Architects, Inc. and TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, tied as the third ranked proposers; CPH, Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; Sol-ARCH, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; William Lane Architect, Inc., as the seventh ranked proposer; Moss Architecture and Design Group, Inc., as the eighth ranked proposer; Alleguez Architecture, Inc., as the ninth ranked proposer; R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, and P.A., as the tenth ranked proposer; Vitalini Corazzini, P.A., as the eleventh ranked proposer; ArcBuilders and Group Incorporated, as the twelfth ranked proposer; Alejandro Pardo Architecture, Inc., as the thirteenth ranked proposer; and UGI Design, Inc., as the fourteenth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Landscape Architecture was as follows: Savino & Miller Design Studio, P.A., as the first ranked proposer; Keith and Schnars, P.A., as the second ranked proposer; CPH, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; Chen-Moore Associates, as the fifth ranked proposer; Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., as the seventh ranked proposer; and Landscape DE, LLC, as the eighth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Civil Engineering was as follows: Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; CES Consultants, inc., as the second ranked proposer, Chen-Moore Associates, as the third ranked proposer; 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., and SRS Engineering, Inc., tied as the fourth ranked proposers; CPH, Inc., as the seventh ranked proposer; and T.Y. Lin International, as the eighth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Environmental Services and Testing Engineering was as follows: E Sciences, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Terracon Consultants, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; EBS Engineering, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; CSA Central, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; and Florida Technical Consultants, LLC, as the fifth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering was as follows: CSA Central, Inc. and Ross& Baruzzini, Inc., tied as the first ranked proposers; 3FM Engineering, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; and UCI Engineering Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the evaluation of proposals, Ross &Baruzzini, Inc. submitted the a letter indicating that without local MEP resources it no longer wished to be considered for award; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Structural Engineering was as follows: 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC and Eastern Engineering Group Company, tied as the first ranked proposers; CES Consultants, Inc., as the third ranked proposer; Master Consulting Engineers, Inc., as the fourth ranked proposer; UCI Engineering Inc., as the fifth ranked proposer; and Diaz, Carreno, Scotti & Partners, Inc., as the sixth ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Interior Design / Space Planning was as follows: TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, as'the first ranked proposer; and MC Designers, inc., as the second ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the discipline of Surveying was follows: Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc., as the first ranked proposer;and WHEREAS, after reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, the City Manager recommends that the Administration be authorized to enter into negotiations as follows: William B. Medellin Architect P.A., CSA Central, Inc., Schindler Architects, Inc., TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, CPH, Inc., Sol-ARCH, Inc., William Lane Architect, Inc., Moss Architecture and Design Group, Inc. Alleguez Architecture, Inc., R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, and P.A., Vitalini Corazzini, P.A., for the discipline of General Architecture. Savino & Miller Design Studio, P.A., Keith and Schnars, P.A., CPH, Inc., Curtis& Rogers Design Studio, Inc., Chen-Moore Associates, and Miller, Legg &Associates, Inc., for the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc., CES Consultants, Inc., Chen-Moore Associates, 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., and SRS Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. E Sciences, Inc., Terracon Consultants, Inc., EBS Engineering, Inc., and CSA Central, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Services and Testing Engineering. CSA Central, Inc., 3FM Engineering, Inc., and UCI Engineering Inc., for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering. 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Eastern Engineering Group Company, CES Consultants, Inc., Master Consulting Engineers, Inc., UCI Engineering Inc., and Diaz, Carreno, Scotti & Partners, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, and MC Designers, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design/Space Planning. Schwebke-Shiskin &Associates, Inc. for the discipline of Surveying. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2018-141-ND for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Repair and Replacement Projects; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with William B. Medellin Architect P.A., CSA Central, Inc., Schindler Architects, Inc., TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, CPH, Inc., Sol- ARCH, Inc., William Lane Architect, Inc., Moss Architecture and Design Group, Inc., Alleguez Architecture, Inc., R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, and P.A., Vitalini Corazzini, P.A., for the discipline of General Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Savino & Miller Design Studio, P.A., Keith and Schnars, P.A., CPH, Inc., Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc., Chen-Moore Associates, and Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., for the ' discipline of Landscape Architecture; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke-Shiskin &Associates, Inc., CES Consultants, Inc., Chen-Moore Associates, 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., and SRS Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with E Sciences, Inc., Terracon Consultants, Inc., EBS Engineering, Inc., and CSA Central, inc., for the discipline of Environmental Services And Testing Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with CSA Central, Inc., 3FM Engineering, Inc., and UCI Engineering Inc., for the discipline of Mechanical, Electrical, And Plumbing Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Eastern Engineering Group Company, CES Consultants, Inc., Master Consulting Engineers, Inc., UCI Engineering Inc., and Diaz, Carreno, Scott' & Partners, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, and MC Designers, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design I Space Planning; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc. for the discipline of Surveying; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with each of the recommended proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. /��� / PASSED AND ADOPTED this /7 day of (�CTOC1er 2018. ATTEST: �3QllY oc-:::4--„______ RAF EL E. tQ GRANADO, CITY CLER., s- DAN GELBER, MAYOR �<. rte." F:IPURCSSoricEtations 1201812018-141-ND Q° ��ir Pe l'r. :,s110-Award\RESO 2018-141-ND.doc I:1 • 4 K, 7,1-:;:•.�.. APPROVED AS TO ' FORM &LANGUAGE to �'`' `�- &FOR EXECUTION t;* 1.ifsCORE 'ic; BORATED t <0. 6)Z (-----, 6-'A Gr —( : , 26' ' City 1tomey �� Date ." .i.e4.4 _ S' Resolutions-C7 P MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission / ' FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: October 17, 2018 SUBJECT A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2018-141-ND, FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH WILLIAM B. MEDELLIN ARCHITECT P.A., CSA CENTRAL, INC., SCHINDLER ARCHITECTS, INC., TSAO DESIGN GROUP, INCORPORATED, CPH, INC., SOL-ARCH, INC., WILLIAM LANE ARCHITECT, INC., MOSS ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN GROUP, INC., ALLEGUEZ ARCHITECTURE, INC., R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, AND P.A., VITALINI CORAZZINI, RA., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF GENERAL ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAVINO & MILLER DESIGN STUDIO, P.A., KEITH AND SCHNARS, P.A., CPH,.INC., CURTIS & ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC., CHEN-MOORE ASSOCIATES, AND MILLER, LEGG .& ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; AUTHORIZING -THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE- SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., CES CONSULTANTS, INC., CHEN-MOORE ASSOCIATES, 305 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC, MILLER, LEGG & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND SRS ENGINEERING, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH E SCIENCES, INC., TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC., EBS ENGINEERING, INC., AND.CSA CENTRAL, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND TESTING ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CSA CENTRAL, INC., 3FM ENGINEERING, INC., AND UCI ENGINEERING INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH 305 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC, EASTERN ENGINEERING GROUP COMPANY, CES CONSULTANTS, INC., MASTER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., UCI ENGINEERING INC., AND DIAZ, CARRENO, SCOTT! & PARTNERS, - INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH TSAO DESIGN GROUP, INCORPORATED, AND MC DESIGNERS, INC., FOR THE DISCIPLINE • OF INTERIOR DESIGN 1 SPACE PLANNING; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH SCHWEBKE- SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE DISCIPLINE OF SURVEYING; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN Page 436 of 1637 AGREEMENT WITH EACH OF THE RECOMMENDED PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. • RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution ANALYSIS On September 28, 2004, through Resolution 2004-24697, the City Commission created the Capital Renewal and Replacement Program (the "CRR Program"). The intent of the CRR Program is to provide funding for proactive renewal and replacement of the City's facilities and the building systems within those facilities (e.g., HVAC, roofs, fire safety systems, etc). The CRR program is also used to execute small repairs, remodels or renovation projects, with total project budgets under $325,000. The average value of the current CRR projects is approximately $158,000, but can be as low as $25,000 or less. In addition to CRR projects, award(s) of this RFQ may also be used for other small projects. Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA), is applicable to the selection of professional consultant services (architecture, professional engineering, landscape architecture, or registered surveying and mapping) by public agencies for projects valued up to the amount established in Category 5, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently $325,000 or as amended by law) or for a planning or study activities valued up to the amount established in Category 2, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently $35,000 or as amended by law). Even for projects below these thresholds,an architect or engineer is often required to develop construction documents for construction and permitting. Award of this RFQ will expedite the selection of architects and engineers as required for small projects. In order to maximize the cost effectiveness of small projects, through this RFQ the City sought to establish-a pool of qualified architectural and engineering consultants interested in providing.the City with professional services for small projects. The categories of work are, as further defined in Appendix C, Architecture — General, Architecture — Landscape Architecture, Engineering — Environmental Services and Testing, and Engineering — Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing, Engineering—Structural. RFQ PROCESS On February 14, 2018,the City Commission approved to issue the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2018-141-ND for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Repair and Replacement Projects, On February 15, 2018, the RFQ was issued. A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on February 27, 2018. Seven addenda were issued. The Procurement Department issued bid notices to 275 companies utilizing www.publicpurchase.com website. 263 prospective bidders accessed the advertised solicitation. RFQ responses were due and received on May 7, 2018. The City received proposals in response to the RFQ from the following 37 firms for a variety of categories as indicated in Attachment A: 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC 3FM Engineering, Inc. Alejandro Pardo Architecture, Inc. AlleguezArchitecture, Inc. ArcBuilders and Group Incorporated Page 437 of 1637 Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc. , CES Consultants, Inc. Chen-Moore Associates CPH, Inc. CSA Central, Inc. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. , Diaz, Carreno, Scotti&Partners, Inc. E Sciences, Inc. Eastern Engineering Group Company EBS Engineering, Inc. Florida Technical Consultants, LLC Keith and Schnars, RA Landscape DE, LLC Master Consulting Engineers, Inc. MC Designers, Inc. Miller, Legg&Associates, Inc. Moss Architecture and Design Group, Inc. R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. Ross&Baruzzini, Inc. Savino&Miller Design Studio, P.A. • Schindler Architects, Inc. Schwebke-Shiskin&Associates, Inc. Sol-ARCH, Inc. SRS Engineering, Inc. T.Y. Lin International Terracon Consultants, Inc. TSAO Design Group, Incorporated UCI Engineering Inc. UCI Engineering, Inc. D/B/A UCI Design, Inc. �ltalini Corazzini, P.A. William B. Medellin Architect PA William Lane Architect, Inc. On February 26, 2018, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC # 105-2018. The Evaluation Committee convened on August 6, 2018, to consider proposals received. The Committee was comprised of Lily Alvarez, Construction Manager, Property Management Department, City of Miami Beach; Pilar Caurin, Construction Manager, Office of Capital Improvement Projects, City of Miami Beach; Elizabeth Estevez, Capital Projects Manager, Parks and Recreation Department, City of Miami Beach; and Francisco Garcia, Construction Manager, Property Management Department, City of Miami Beach. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A. Subsequent to the evaluation of proposals, Ross & Baruzani, Inc. submitted the attached letter indicating that without local MEP resources it no longer wished to be considered for award. Due to the large number of responses, a summary of each top-ranked firm or the firm's proposal is available upon request. Page 438 of 1637 CONCLUSION After reviewing all the submissions and the results of the evaluation process, I note that the City is fortunate to have received a large number of responses to the RFQ. In determining the number of firms to award in each category,staff has recommended the number of firms believed to be necessary to complete the volume of work available for each category. Awarding too many firms in any given category would not be in the City's best interest as,an insufficient volume of projects may cause, the awarded firms to become disinterested and not provide the necessary level of service to the City. Therefore, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations as follows: William B. Medellin Architect P.A., CSA Central, Inc., Schindler Architects, Inc., TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, CPH, Inc., Sol-ARCH, Inc., William Lane Architect, Inc., Moss Architecture and Design Group, Inc., Alleguez Architecture, Inc., R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, and P.A., Vitalini Corazzini, P.A.,for the discipline of General Architecture, Savino & Miller Design Studio, P.A., Keith and Schnars, PA, CPH, Inc., Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc., Chen-Moore Associates, and Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., for. the discipline of Landscape Architecture. Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates, Inc., CES Consultants, inc., Chen-Moore Associates, 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Miller, Legg & Associates, Inc., and SRS Engineering, Inc., for the discipline of Civil Engineering. E Sciences, Inc., Terracon Consultants, Inc., EBS Engineering, Inc., and CSA Central, Inc., for the discipline of Environmental Services and Testing Engineering. CSA Central, Inc., 3FM Engineering, Inc., and UCI Engineering Inc.,for the discipline of Mechanical. Electrical.and Plumbing Engineering._ 305 Consulting Engineers, LLC, Eastern Engineering Group Company, CES Consultants, Inc., Master Consulting Engineers, Inc., UCI Engineering Inc., and Diaz, Carreno, Scotti & Partners, Inc., for the discipline of Structural Engineering. TSAO Design Group, Incorporated, and MC Designers, Inc., for the discipline of Interior Design / Space Planning. Schwebke-Shiskin &Associates, Inc.for the discipline of Surveying. and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with,each of the) recommended proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Build And Maintain Priority Infrastructure With Full Accountability FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. Lagistative Tracking Property Management/Procurement Page 439 of 1637 ATTACHMENTS_ Descript ion ❑ Attachment A ❑ Ross and Barazzuni Letter ❑ Resolution • Page 440 of 1637 ATTACHMENT A ARCHITECTURE-GENERAL RF02011.1Nd10 PROFESSIONAL —� o i I ARCHITECTURAL MO ENGINEERINGco m OI I • Lily Alvarez Pilar Ceurin 6 Elizabeth Estevez x SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL ANO -Y Y `- Francisco Garcia c Ow I e REPLACEMENT PROJECTS I W b c c A99■eUatB c tY :� Qualitative Quantitative t Subtotal Qualitative ,Quanhitallve Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal ¢ �... t--.' Totals 1 t 4 Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Witham B.Medellin Architect I ----•—_—•—i— P"A. 98 0 96 1 95 — 0 95 4 92 0 92 3 . 100 0 10D 11 9 1 CSA Central,Inc _-•- _ 96 0 96 1• 98 0 98 1 91 0 91 4 ' 98 0 • 98 5 11 2 Schndler Architects,Inc. 95 0 95 6 94 0 94 J S 95 0 95 I 99 0 99 —3 15 3 TSAO Design Group, • —"—— -•—"—" Incorporated 95 0 95 6 93 0 93 6 94 _ 0 94 ' 2_ _ _ 100 0 100 1 15 3 CPH,Inc. 96 0 96 1 97 0 97 3 84 0 84 . 9 99 0 99 3 16 5 Sol-ARCH.Inc, 1 95 0 95 6 98 0 96 _ 1 86 0 86 7 98 098 5— 19 6_ WSSamLane Architect.Inc. 95 0 - _96• 1 87 0 67 10 90 0 90 5 93 0 — 93 11 27 —� 7 Moss Architecture and Design I - Gump.Inc. _95 .0 95 _"6 90 0 90 8 86 0 85 7 97_ 0 97 8 29 9 ANe9uezArchitecture.Inc. 96•• 0 •86 •1 89 —• 0 59 9 80 0 80 11 94 0 94 9 30 `9 R.J.Heisenbottle Architects, — _ P A. 94 0 _. 94 10 91 • 0 91 7 88 - 0 _ 88 6 94 0 94 9 32 10 Vitatni Corazzini,P.A. 94 0 94 •10 82 0 82 12) 82 0 62 10 98 0 98 5 37 •:11 ArcBuilders and Group • — — -- --- Incorporated 94 0 94 10 64 ,_• 0 •• 84 11 75 0 I 75 14 54 0 84 12 47 12 Alejandro Pardo Architecture. • Inc. 93 0 I 93 13 80 0 80 .13 79 0 I 79 12 79 0 79 13 51 13 UCI Design.Inc. 88 0 88 14 69 0 I 69 114 78 1 0 78 13 76 0 -_ 78 14 55 i14 Propar Vl..un.Pole falai Cutvt.o.0 Alya'db PrOC ARN004.10/.,t. 0 0 A..j...,c0 10,0 Inc 0 , 0 Mteueas mud G,aw assaeaamd • 0 0 - fA'H Inc 0 0 . CSA Cerra int •• - 0 0 WOO MU,ane,u,O ana 0 0n Ga4,Inc. —.•_0 --0 •- RJ 1,004r000bMe.trr.P.A a 0 3001.010Mtl.uGs..t0 0 0 MAO ono G00.l vna0I000 a 0 W EnONwn5.Inc MBJA UGI D000A we. 0 0 Walks Camini•PA a a W00016 Uaaetm Aad4act Pa0 0 MUM IYsNeMlacl.Ito 1 FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. • • Page 441 of 1637 ATTACHMENT A ARCHITECTURE-LANDSCAPE REQ29N.i41.8DPROITESto9AL 1 t ��..—. motnEiru.... R0ENUMEERING m!t co c • SHWICE9EOR L:APRALItf11EWlyR11D Lily Alvarez zl P8ar Caurin a Elizabeth EsteveZ l e c Low TL i:r I Francisco Garcia i PL1GF11DR PROJECTS I12 t i e g Aggregate I _ 11 _ _• _J Totals Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal, 1 Qualitative Quantitative^ Subtotal I Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal-1 Qualitative Quantitative.I• Subtotal i Savin&Miller Design Studio. I . . _ P A _ _ 97 0 97 1 ' 95. 0 95 4 94 0 94 1 teD 0 r 100 1 7 1 Keith and Schnars.P.A. 96 0 96 3 97 0 97 2 92 0 92 2 100T_ 0 I 100 1 8 2 CPR.Inc. 96 — 0 - 96 96- 3 97 --0 _ 97 2 86 0 86 6 t00 0 t 100 1 jr— Curtis&Rogers Design Studio. — •— _ Inc. _ 96 _ 0 96 3 98 0 98 1 .87 0 87 5 98 0 98 6 14 •4 Chan-Moore Associates __97 -0- 97 1 : 91 0 91 8 90 0 _ _ 90 . 4 98 0 1 08 •6 16 .6 ' • Miller.Legg 8.Associates.Inc. 95 , 0 95 6 88 0 88 7 91 0 91 3 100 0 i 100 '1 J17 '6 Calvin,Giordano&Associates. Inc.' 95 0 95 6 92 0 92 _5 86 0 86 6 96 0 86 .7 24 7 Landscape DE.LLC 93 0 93 8 . .83 0 83 •• 8 80 0 - 80 8 96 D , , 96 7 j 31 •8 .i.P.rr K.SF.p.iu.n. T.irou.waw. Ca,0adra•Assam,.c 0 0 Crw.m.swOatoi —•—. 0 0 CPO.at. —•-_.V 0 0 OA.Oagp.D.wp 5440.410 0 0 Kd.rtl aem.s PA. O 0 00050aoe0E.LLC 0 0 - uoo ten M0000a...a 0 0 - s.:roepwn Diegn Span PA. 0 D FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. . • • • • Page 442 of 1637 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING-CIVIL - 879 2101841041e PROFESSIONAL - - A to O s FaRwctua�maul Awn Lily Alvarez Pilar Catton x E9zabeth Estevez .E I Francisco Garcia a low c ite ACEM1174TPR04ECT5 a A99regata le 2 a __ r� rotes • Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal _Qualitative ; Quantitative`_Subtotal__ - Qualitative quantitative Subtotal Qualitative j Quantitative Subtotal . Schwebke-Sbiskin 8 - Assoaates.Inc. 95 0 95 5 97 0 97 3' 95 0 95 1 100 0 100 2 11 1 CES Consultants,Inc. 97 0 97 2 95 0 95 4• 92 0 92 5 100 0 100 2 13 2 Chen-Moore Associates _97 _0 _ 87 2 91 0 91 7. 93 0 93 3 100 0 100 2 14 3 305 Consulting Enou ers_LLC_- 95 5 , _ 100 1 84 5 89 8% 87 6 92 5 98 5 103 1 15 4 LbIler,Legg&Associates.Inc. 95 0 95 5 94 0 _ 94 _. 5• •43 0 93 3 100 0 100 •2 15 4 _ SRSEnginoon .,Inc. 95 0 95 5 98 0 98 __. 1____•94 0 94 2 98 0 98 7 15 4 CPM.Inc 94 0 94 _8 98 0 98 1 91 0 91 7 100 0 100 2 18 7 T Y.Linlnternattonal 97 0 97 2" 92 •-'-0-�- -'-'92 - 6• 90 _,0 90 8 98 0 98 7 23_. . ;we.., v eh aeiea 1 TMSOu.dldtre it6Co s.%C Sneer ALC 5 1 0 Cam...CCam...i. 0 0 Vnclimebsu.ida 0 0 - CEt1,v¢ 0 0 eg.te116aeemxe..0 0 0 541.0[14-51‘015 1 loace. tee 0 a WS Frgi...eg K 0 0 r.Y siwnmaoeiJ a a i 1 FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. Page 443 of 1637 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING-ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND TESTING I - . ..... MCI altsimaoPaorESSIONAL : Aecenrcrvem.NO ENOMEERNG 2. a. ... Lily Alvarez Pilar Gabriel S Elizabeth Estevez E Francisco Garcia j: I Low 2 SERVICES PORCJNIALRENEwALArto "i _v t . aggregate REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ci a. ri rc l 1 Totals (2 Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal ClualitatIve • CluanNtatlyf Subtotal ' Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal i E Sciences,Inc. 96 ' 0 96 1 95 0 .95 2 96 0 86 1 loo - 0 100 I . . . . 1 , A .. .1. Ter(11C011 Consultants,Inc 96 0 98 1 95 0 95 ,2 88 —.-•• - 0 BB 3 100 0 100 1 i 7 2 EBS Engineering,Inc. • 95 0 95 4 96 0 98 1 1 92 0 .92 . 2 100 0 100 1 I 8 . •3• CSA Central Inc. ss 0 96 1 os 0 soi 4 87 0 87 4 100 0 100 1 10 .4. - -1 Florida Technical Consultants, _ . LLC 94 0 94 5 82 0 82 ;5 82- 0 82 5 94 0 94 5 20 • . ....._ Yf;•':,ig,qi/E.'.+7&:;.;;Q;447.1;;7....,::";lq',1.....7.2... . . p.p.. Volonolo Pont Tot0Ocerst001Ns OSA Looral.fro 0 1 0 E Sorouo oC 0 ; 0 _ MS 1".. ..,oc 0 1 0 runao redocalC0outona.LLC " 0 0 !Tmoso Colman,.. 0 ; 0 FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. • • , i • Page 444 of 1637 • - ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING-MECHANICAL,ELECTRICAL,AND PLUMBING IFcmta1laW PROPESS1oBAt '—• —-- -. .. . ARCHITECTURAL ABO ENGINEERING u ' o UlyAlvarez c Pilar Gamin c ElizabathEatevez s Francisco Garcia .SLow c SERVICES FDRCAPRY Y ALRENEWALAHD RFPLACFLEM PROJECTS A m e Aggregate 32 .to.— oe - X aTotals 3 Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative 1 Quantitative I Subtotal Qualitative 1 Quantitative Subtotal Quaftallua Quantitative ' Subtotal 1CSA Central Inc. 95 0 95 1 96 0 I 96 1 89 __ 0 89 2 ' 100 – 0 100 1 5 • 1 Ross&Baruzzinl.Inc. 95 0 95 1 95 0 95 2_ _0__ 92 . 1 100 0 100 ' I 5 _ f :3FM Engineering.Inc. 90 0 90 3 94 0 _ 94 3 —88—T 0 B8 3 98 0 ! 98 4 ! 13 •_ •3 _ IUCI Engineering.Inc. 90 0 90 3 90 0 90 _ 4 86 0 56 , 4 99 0 i 99 3 I 14 4 'tame YIYnn.PaIM Taalaa0twv, • UNEnpllwU0.e . 0 0 CSACootInn. 0 0 Ran a Binges,00 0 0 110 E ,.000.irc 0 0 FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. • • Page 445 of 1637 • • • • ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING-STRUCTURAL RFO is/61614lb PROFESSIONAL •• ----• ea SERVIGESFOR CAPITAL MERMAN° Lily Alvarez Pilar CawIn ciii ° Ellzdbe[h ESleve2 r e Low x 3e ; Francisco Garcia PEPIACEYEarPRaJEC15 i 1 e gggtegafi .-_.---._ . _ t2 Totals_.. . . �I y... _-_quaGUtfv4 gwntlnuve 3ubrotal gwOtatNe Quantitative _-_subtotal i purttitative 1 QuantitativeSubtotal quafhative� Quantitative Subtotal 305 Consulting Engineers,LLC 95 5 100 1• 88 5 93 1 79 5 84 5 1003 105 ' I 1 1 Eastern Engineering Group 8_•. Company 95 0 95 3 92 0 92 2 90 0 90 1 100 0 100 2 8 t CES Consultants,inc. 97 0 97 2 91 0 91 3 87 0 - 87 3 100 0 100 :2- 10 3 Marler Consulting Engineers, • --• - ••• -••— - -. --•-- inc. 95 0 95 3 84 0 84 5 89 0 89 2 i 98 0 98 .4 14 4 I MI Engineering.Inc. 94 0 94 5 91 0 91 3. 87 0 87 394 0 9a 5 i 15 5 t Diaz.Carreno.Scoiti 8 -'- r„ 1 Partners,Inc. 92 0 92 6 81 0 81 - 8 75 0 75 : 6 92 F 0 92----- 5 I 24 '8 i . . •.*aimnNalear:' .. .mpuM Ywwan•.PSI. TWIOjINIW SOf CaaW.p 6,50,03.411C 5 S CES Cae.Sn..Mt. a , 0 I MY.Cow,S.s.b pwv... a p • Farr F.gn.w.p C,up royan a p LIM Paperrrnp 0c Muer Cea.nO C^Pma.be ••--a a 1 l FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. • -Page 446 of 1637 L£96 3O Lbti abed • • • 'N0lLV0143W18O2321 OMVMV NV d1111J1SNO3 lON 930001.INNVI•1IVNIJ'AINO S36Odelftd AVIdS10 210.4 o o o..oauanea.a weaeni a a an+aee,o p,. OWL mZ.d conn.. .alma .Z B L'Z _ 96 0 L 96 ZL 69 0 69 Z L9 0 L9 Z 46 0 tel 'aul'siau6isa0Oyy 1 e , 1 001 0 001 1 C6 0 £6 1 06 0 06 1 S6 0 56 Pal ° Oaul J N!oi4ng eniuilNenb 1 aomig,nb • Ie1o19nS a Iailluen� on,igen 1 o n o ¢ uan ...11.111..0 1 I A N b I R b IM 19 S I NI IR b* ' letoigng I an!leiguenb aNielllanb •dna u615aQ OV(S� • R. aie0 66V a. �' S1ZN OIld 11131137,11311 - o I n�ol -® ,(211,0 07elauelj — zaneis341a9�!13—.. ; ullneO+eqd--- y I za.en!V hill — QaY h�Rall3a'Ieude]u0J 537Utl3S ea m fl m owe3axl0i6 axrmuiiy311x�ro I TYIgRS340ad RI•0441010121 ONINNVId 33VdS 1 NSIS30 HO1831N1 V 1NVIHOVJ_.LV - • ATTACHMENT A SURVEYING • RFQ2015141•NG FROFESSICN& ARCHITECTURAL A Ti ENGINEERING m• a s Low Lily Alvarez E Pilar Caurin c' ElizabethEstevez Frar7iseoGarcia z SERVICES FCRCAPRAL RENEWAL AND _ yc, REPLACEMENT PROJECTS :w A I ! 'e Aggregate;e, -cc - CZ I a. ;a Totals ��I Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Schwebke-Shiskin& —- Associates,Inc._ _ 95 0 95 1 98 0 98 1 95 0 95 1 100 -0 100 1 4 _ _I 1 1 Laws. Pmperr GrRn 4 Acie.be vw..aes Pain. TwrhrnhnM 0 p FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. • r C • Page 448 of 1637 • RossiaruzzrnI 7200 NW 19'Street,Suite 305 Miami,Florida 33126 305.477.8338 October 2,2018 Ms.Natalia Delgado City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue,3'Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 RE RFQ 2018-141-ND,Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Renewal and Replacement Projects,Engineering-Mechanical,Electrical&Plumbing Dear Ms.Delgado and Members of the Selection Committee, This letter is a follow-up to our submission submitted to the City of Miami Beach on May 7 relative to On-Call Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing (MEP) Engineering Services. We understand that Ross & Baruzzini is being considered as a candidate for award of the On-Call Contract. We wanted to inform the City of Miami Beach that our local resources have changed since we submitted our Proposal: • Our local office remains strong in the security,communications and technology disciplines and our firm will continue to offer these services form our local office. • We no longer have mechanical,electrical and plumbing(MEP)resources in our local office;but do have 1 these resources within our headquarters in St.Louis. We remain interested in the contract relative to security,communications and technology focused projects;but without local MEP resources it may be in your best interest to consider firms with local MEP resources for projects that are MEP focused. We thought it best to inform the City of Miami Beach of this change in local resources since our submission and • understand any ramifications relative to selection of firms for the contract. Respectfully, • joeeseaveziod.... Michael E.Shea,AIA Senior Vice President,Government Market M:314.378.6082;mshea@rossbar.com Cc:Susan Dimond,Bill Overturf rossbar.com Page 449 of 1637 ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) &ADDENDUMS 35 I M I AMI [ EAC H Procurement Department D 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • • ADDENDUM NO.7 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS(the RFQ) April 18,2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued-in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City.The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for receipt of submittals is extended until 3:00 p.m., Monday, May 7,2018,at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late submittals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. No further questions will be considered. 2. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. • Q1: The answe r to Q17 states that the City already has a pool of professional surveyors and the City will not consider adding this category to the list of services. Under the Revised Statement of Work Required—Exhibit B (Revised Exhibit C), Surveying has been listed as a category of work. Please clarify whether surveying is included as a category in this RFQ proposal or not. Al: Please refer to Addendum No. 5, Exhibit B: Revised Appendix C, Minimum Requirements &Specifications,surveying has been added to the categories of work. Any questions -regarding this- Addendum .should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential prop rs that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Pr sp c ive Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. Sin f-ly, lex � is / !Vr`• Pro -ment Director RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#7 4/18/2018 MI A M I BEACProcurement Department 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 • www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO.6 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO,2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS(the RFQ) April 16,2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for receipt of submittals is extended until 3:00 p.m., Monday, April 30, 2018,at the following location: • City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 - I Late submittals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. - i No further-questions will be considered: Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to .the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: . Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext.6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission.- Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Pros ctive Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. 'n fely, r 7 lex D l Procurement Director RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#6 4/16/2018 M IA V l I B EACHProcurement Department 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • ADDENDUM NO.5 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS (the RFQ) April 13,2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). • 1. REVISION: Delete Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format,on page 12—13 of the RFQ, in its entirety and Replace with Revised Section 0300,Submittal Instructions and Format, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. REVISION: Delete Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications, on page 27—28 of the RFQ, in its entirety and Replace with Revised Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications, attached here to as • Exhibit B. - 3. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: Revised Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format Exhibit B: Revised Appendix C, Minimum Requirements&Specifications 4. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. • Q1: Could you please clarify what is needed for the three references? Do we need reference letters or just contact information? Al: As stipulated in Appendix A, Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit, 3. References & Past Performance, for each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name & Title, 3) Address, 4) Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. Q2: Do only originals need to be in 3 ring binders or the 10 copies also? A2: As stipulated in Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, 1. Sealed Responses, the City prefers that the original be in a 3-ring. Additionally,that the Proposer submit ten (10) bound copies and one(1)electronic format(CD or USB format). How the copies are bound is up to the proposer. • Q3: Pg 13, Section 2.3.1 Audited Financial Statements in lieu of D&B SQR. Will a current (2017-2018) certification letter from FOOT suffice for Audited Financial Statements?or do you require the Audited Financial Statement itself as submitted to FDOT for Certification? A3: Please refer to Exhibit A: Revised Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format. Neither is requested at this time. RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 MI A J� /� I B EAC F-I Procurement Department V 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q4: Are the proposing firms required to submit sub-consultants to address all the service areas identified on p. 28 of Appendix C? A4: Proposers may but are not required to submit proposals for all categories of work •• stated within the RFQ. Proposals must be limited to a single category of work. Those Proposers wishing to submit proposals for multiple categories of work must submit a separate proposal for each category. For example, if a Proposer wishes to submit a proposal • for Architecture-General AND for Engineering-Structural, the Proposer must submit a single .• proposal for Architecture-General and a separate and distinct proposal for Engineering- Structural. • Proposals are not to include sub-consultants at this time.Proposals shall only be submitted • for the areas of work that will be completed by the submitting firm. • Q5: Under"Experience and Qualifications of the Firm", you have asked for an SF330. Then, under • "Experience and Qualifications of the Team", you have asked, "A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract". The SF330 includes resumes. Are you looking for resumes to be included twice in two separate sections? A5: Please refer to Exhibit A: Revised Section 0300,Submittal Instructions and Format. Q6: Under"Experience and Qualifications of the Team", you are asking for "Project Experience: For each architect and engineer, include information for three (3) relevant projects, performed in the last five years, for public or private sector clients."Does"architect and engineer" refer to each individual on the team,or rather to the firm as a whole?Projects are included in the SF330.Are you looking for • projects to be included twice in two separate sections? A6: See response to item Q5 above. Q7: Do we have to submit info for both Tab 2 and Tab 3.or just Tab 2 since we are submitting as a firm and not as a Team? A7: See response to item Q4 above. • Q8: In the RFQ, under the Format section, for Tab 2.2 (Qualifications of Proposing Firm), are we to use SF 330 section F to present this information? AB: See response to item Q5 above. Q9: We are a consulting engineer (Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing) firm, do we have to be listed under an architect in the proposal or can we submit our own proposal? A9: See response to item Q4 above. • • RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 . 4/13/2018 M I A 1 I B EAC I-IProcurement Department 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q10: Insurance Requirements-Are we required to carry Workers'Comp,General Liability, and Automobile Liability?We do carry the 1 M professional liability being an engineering firm. A10: Yes,the Consultant will need to maintain the minimum levels of insurance indicated in Appendix D, Insurance Requirements. Q11: Could the City please clarify intent?"Teams"with'the"Prime"being the discipline under which you • are submitting or Single-discipline proposals with no sub-consultants included?or will both types of submittals be allowed in which case..is it up to the Proposer? All: See response to item Q4 above. Q12: Tab 2 Section 2.2 asks for client references,Tab 3 Section 3.1.1 also asks for client references, and item 3 of the Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit also asks for • references. Can these references be the same? Al2: No, references requested under Appendix A and Tab 3 are for the firm. References • requested under Tab 4 are for the Proposer's individual team members (architects and engineers). Q13: Can the proposer include references from City of Miami Beach staff? A13: Yes,the proposer can include references from the City, providing they are specific to a project. Q14: Is there a preponderance of vertical or horizontal tasks anticipated from this contract? A14: The City anticipates there to be a preponderance of vertical tasks resulting from the award of this solicitation. Q15: While we understand that the industry is generally called Architectural/Engineering Services, Page 27 item C2 lists categories being sought grouped categorically as either "Architecture" or "Engineering". In the case of, for example, "Architecture — Landscape", the fact that it is written where landscape is appended to architecture it could be misunderstood to read_that a landscape architectural firm must be sub or part of architectural team because of the way it is written. Please • clarify that it is not the intent of the City to force landscape architecture services to be solely provided as a sub to an architectural prime, and instead landscape architectural services can be submitted independently. A15: See response to item Q4 above. Q16: "Engineering — Structural" is listed'twice, Can the City clarify if one of those was intended to be "Engineering—Civil" A16: Please refer to Exhibit B: Revised Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications. RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 MIAn /� I [� EAC H Procurement Department / V 1 D 1755 Meridian Ave,3^d Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q17: Does the City already have a pool of Professional Surveyors? If not, will the City consider adding this category to the list of services? A17: The City already has a pool of Professional Surveyors. Hence, the City will not consider adding this category to the list of services. Q18: Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing services are all grouped together, however there are many highly qualified firms that provide one and not all three of those services. Will the City consider • breaking•each of these out into separate categories? A18: See response to item Q16 above. Q19: If the City will not break-out Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing services into separate categories, • will the City clarify if a firm that does not provide all three services in-house will preclude them from • being eligible to submit. A19: "See response to item Q16 above. Q20: During the Pre-Proposal Conference it was stated that firms could submit individually or as a part of a team. Concerns were brought up by several of the participants and attendees that that structure would result in disadvantageous situations for the applicants. Seldom are projects, even the small • ones,only the product of one sole discipline. Therefore, an applicant may be selected by the City as part of,a 'pool', for example for.Landscape Architectural or Civil Engineering Services. If, for example, a project is then given to an Architect for a building renovation or annex that will also require landscape and civil work, and if that Architect's RFQ submittal included a Civil Engineer or Landscape Architect as a part of their 'team', then the contracted firm in the pool of qualified consultants selected by the City will not see the benefits of having submitted to perform any necessary intersecting services required as a part of the scope for that specific building renovation project. We think that the option to submit independently or as a part of a team may result in (a) bulking-up all the RFQ responses that will be received by the City to include both prime and consultant services—which will make the task of an apples-to-apples comparison by the evaluation committee very difficult — or it may (b) dissuade qualified applicants from submitting altogether because they have not formed the established relationships other 'teams' may have in place — ultimately reducing the options for qualified professionals available for the City to choose from and setting the City at a disadvantage. We would respectfully recommend that all responses be made solely for the primary in-house service offered and that the option to also submit as part of a team be eliminated. That way, each applicant will be solely evaluated based on that primary service they are providing. The City could request that each applicant could state what firms they have had past experiences with thatprovide what would be sub-consultant services in a new Tab 2.4 to be included in Page 13. The City could then clarify that as a project becomes available, it would be the City's responsibility to assemble the. project team solely from those within the pool. If a prime has a stated working relationship with another firm that is also in the pool, then the City could favorably select that second firm to be a part of the team, or not. Ultimately,this will be in the City's best interest because(a)it will ensure that all team-members have been properly vetted through the selection process, and (b) it will clarify the process to those of us responding to this RFQ. RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 Iv\.I A Jv� I B E /` C H/ �/ ` /�-� 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Given the above, please confirm if it is still the intent of the City to allow submittals to be independently submitted as well as a part of a team. A20: See response to item Q4 above. • Q21: We understood from the statements made during the Pre-Proposal Conference that, for ease and facility of review, all submittals for each different service category should be submitted as separate packages, independently. Therefore, 1 firm who submits for 3 different service categories will provide 3 separate submittals. We certainly understand the effectiveness of this request; we simply • want to confirm if our understanding is correct. A21: The City confirms that for ease and facility of review all submittals for each different service category must be submitted as separate packages,independently. Q22: Appendix A.What tab does the questionnaire affidavit fall under. Should Appendix A be a tab unto itself? A22: See response to item Q5 above. Q23: 2.3 Financial Capacity. Do we request D&B SQR after the bid opening upon notification from the City or do we'have D&B send the SQR to the City now? A23: As stipulated in Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, 4. Financial Capacity, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualifier Report (SQR)within three (3)days of request by the City. Q24: The numbering under the Submittal Instructions and Format seems to be off starting on page 12.Will you be updating that? A24: See response to item Q5 above. Q25: Are you looking for teams or individual firms for each"category"? A25: See response to item Q4 above. Q26: Civil engineering is not listed but structural is listed twice. Please clarify. A26: See response to item Q16 above. • Q27: Is the City of Miami Beach looking to award individual Agreements for each Discipline or only (1) Agreement with a Prime and Sub-consultants. Also, if it will only be(1)Agreement,who shall be the Prime? A27: Sub-consultants are not being considered at this time. The City of Miami Beach is looking to award individual agreements for each discipline. In the case were a firm is awarded various disciplines, one agreement will be executed and will indicate the various disciplines. • RFQ No.2018-141:ND Addendum#5 • 4/13/2018 Procurement Department 1\/\I/\/\/\ I V EAC 1 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q28: Would the City be able to provide a list of the firms that currently hold contracts and expiration date of those contracts? . I A28: The City currently does not have a contract for professional architectural and engineering services for capital renewal and replacement projects. Q29: Is the Architectural and Engineering Services for this RFQ associated with the cost less than $325,000? A29: Yes, this RFQ is for professional architectural and engineering services for capital renewal and replacement projects usually expected to cost less than$325,000.. Q30: Page 27 lists Engineering-Structural as a category two times. Is another category of engineering required? A30: See response to item Q16 above. Q31: Please elaborate on the type of testing &inspection services required under the Master Agreement. A31: No testing or inspection services are required.See response to item Q16 above. Q32: Can a firm submit as a prime consultant&be a subconsultant on other firm's teams? A32: See response to item Q4 above. Q33: Under which category(ies)does the following services fall under? • -Lab Testing -Soils&Geologic Studies,Foundations -Roofing Assessments, Replacements ' -Testing &Inspection Services A33: See response to item Q16 above. Soils & Geologic Studies, Foundations falls under the Engineering — Environmental,Services and Testing category. Roofing Assessments, . Replacements falls under the Architecture—General category. Q34: Please provide information on what type of testing services are required for the Engineering- Environmental Services category. A34: Various, including, but not limited to: surveys for asbestos containing materials (or ACM);lead based materials,Asbestos/Lead Abatement,and indoor air monitoring services. . Q35: Please provide clarification as to what lab testing services are required under the Master Agreement. A35: The category for lab testing ,services was deleted from Appendix C, Minimum • Requirements&Specifications. RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 IV\ I A I B EAC H Procurement Department 1755 Meridian , ,Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q36: Page 12,TAB 2reads 1.3.Should this be part of TAB 1 or TAB 2? A36: See response to item Q5 above. Q37: Under "SECTION 0300/SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT", please clarify where APPENDIX A, B, D&E are to be placed in RFQ Submittal package. A37: See response to item Q22 above. Appendix B is to be submitted if the Proposer has elected not to submit a proposal. Hence, it is not mentioned in Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format. Appendix D and E are not to be included in the proposal. Q38: Section 2.2(Qualifications of Proposing Firm) ask to submit information regarding experience on non-residential small projects, construction cost below 325,000. Is it possible to include private offices, retail, restaurants, city projects such as certifications, zoning consulting and private historical • like Deering Estate or Woman's Club at Coconut Grove? A38: Yes, when submitting information regarding experience you can include private offices, retail, restaurants, city projects such as certifications, zoning consulting and private historical projects. Q39: For section 3.1.1 it seems to duplicate section 2.2.Are we to provide small projects in both sections? • and are the projects supposed to be individual experience, firm experience or subconsultant experience? • A39: Tab 3, Section 3.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm, requests firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing architecture or engineering • . services, preferably to public sector agencies, for non-residential small projects. Tab 4, Section 4.1.1 Project Experience, requests the experience of the firm's individual team members on small projects as defined in Section 3.1. Proposals are not to include sub • - consultants at this time. Q40: Should the DUNS information required in Tab 2.3 be sent to you? A40: Not at this time. As stipulated in Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and Format, 4. Financial Capacity,Proposer shall arrange for Dun&Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualifier Report(SQR)within three(3)days of request by the City. The Supplier Qualifier Report(SQR), • shall be sent via email to nataliadelgadona,miamibeachfl.gov. Q41: In Section C2. Statement of Work Required(Page 27 of RFQ), could the City please clarify what the scope of items are for the Engineering—Environmental Services and Testing category? A41: See response to item Q34 above. Q42: We would like to know how we should structure the proposal in regards to Tab 2 (Page 12 of RFQ). Would the City like two tabs for#2, one in front of item 1.3 and one in front of item 2.1? A42: See response to item Q5 above. RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5^ 4/13/2018 n � E/\C Procurement Department v ►I /��� Y I 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q43: Are there any subs which may be e cluded from participating on teams, as they may be on existing contracts with the City? A43: See response to item Q36 above. Q44: We understand that "testing," as it relates to geotechnical, laboratory services, and/or building materials testing, is included in the"Environmental—Environmental Services and Testing"category. Is this correct? If no,then what categories do each of the following services fall under? • Lab Testing • Soils&Geologic Studies, Foundations • Roofing Assessments, Replacements • Testing& Inspection Services A44: See response to item Q33 above. Q45: Can a firm submit as a prime consultant&be a subconsultant on other firm's teams? A45: See response to item Q32 above. Q46: Page 27 lists "Engineering—Structural"as a category two times. Is another category of engineering required? A46: See response to item Q16 above. Q47: Who are the incumbents? • A47: See response to item Q28 above. Q48: Page 12: Please confirm that the hard copy submittal requires tab label of"0400" or if it can be labeled as outlined in the Proposal format(Tab 1,Tab 2,etc.). A48: It is strongly recommended that the Proposals be organized and tabbed in accordance with Section 0300,Submittal Instructions and Format. Q49: Page 13: Please clarify minimum required small projects of as minimum of three or five. A49: See response to item Q5 above. Q50: Page 13: Section 3.1.1.cites small projects as defined in 2.1. Please clarify that definition of small projects is per Section 2.2. A50: See response to item Q5 above. Q51: Where should we include Appendix A? A51: See response to item Q5 above. RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 M I A l 1 BEACHProcurement Department 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www,miamibeachfl.gov Q52: Regarding the proposal format, noticed that you have Tab 2 twice. Should the second Tab 2 be changed to Tab 3 and so on.. A52: See response to item Q5 above. Q53: Could you please make clarification in reference to the requested structure of_the response. On tab 2, section 2.1 is requesting the use of Standard Form 330. On this form, it is a requirement to show 10 projects that show qualification of the firm and the key people involved (which is reflected in the matrix section G of the SF330). A53: See response to item Q5 above. Q54: On the "Submittal Instructions and Format" proposed by Miami Beach, is the information to be included in Tab 2#2.2"Qualifications of Proposing Firm"the Form 330 Section E or Section F from Form 330? Section E lists 5 relevant projects to be entered in that section while we are required to submit three (3) Section F "Example Projects" as per Tab 3 on the "Submittal. Instructions and Format"proposed by Miami Beach. A54: Tab 3 Section 3.1 requests the Qualifications of the Proposing Firm. Form 330 Section E and F make reference to the key personnel and team. Q55: Regarding Form 330 Section F, I understand we need to submit three (3) small projects relevant to the category of work for this proposal/RFQ (Three (3) small projects are specified in, Tab 3 on the "Submittal Instructions and Format" proposed by Miami Beach). Is Section F the same information that is specified to be included in Tab 3 on the "Submittal Instructions and Format" proposed by Miami Beach? If so,do I place a copy of those three(3)Section F example projects together with the Form 330 in Tab 2 and another copy of the Section F three(3)small projects in Tab 3 as well? A55: See response to item Q5 above. • Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov . Contact: • Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext.6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Prospective Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. Si ely, Al-xD- scurement Director • RFQ No.2018-141-ND • Addendum#5 4/13/2018 M I A! Y l I B EACHProcurement Department 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • • • Exhibit A Revised Section 0300, Submittal Instructions and,Format • • • • • • RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Proposal (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals.Additionally,ten(10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation • number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications is to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Table of Content 1.1 Cover Letter.The cover letter must be signed by a principal or agent able to the bind the firm and contain the following: (a) Prime Proposer. Include the name and location of the Prime Proposer, Primary Proposes Representative for the RFQ, Representative's Contact.Joint Ventures are not allowed under this RFQ. (b) Selected Category of Work. Proposer must indicate the category of work for which proposal is submitted. Categories of Work, include: Architecture — General; Architecture — Landscape; Engineering — Environmental; Engineering—Mechanical,Electrical&Plumbing; Engineering—Structural. • Proposers shall submit separate proposals for each category of work for which a proposal is " submitted. Example: a firm which provides general architecture and landscape architecture shall submit one proposal for Architecture—General and a separate and distinct proposal for Architecture—Landscape. • 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. TAB 2 i Minimum Requirements 2.1 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications, including a) Architect I. Engineering Firm. Provide copies that the firm is certified by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation to do business in Florida. b) Principle and Account Representatives. For the principle and account representative(s) submitted under Tab 2 below, submit copies that individuals are licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation to do business in Florida. Proposer should also submit copies of architect/engineer license for all licensed firm employees. RFQ 2018-141-ND MIAMI BEACH TAB 3 Experience&Qualifications of the Firm 3.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant •• experience and proven track record of providing architecture or engineering services, preferably to public sector agencies, for non-residential small projects (construction costs below $325,000 and planning/studies below • $35,000). Submit at least three (3) small projects relevant to the category of work for which the proposal has been • submitted, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of requested experience, preferably to public sector agencies. For each small project submitted,the following is required: • project name, • project description (including cost/budget), • agency/client name, • agency/client contact, • contact telephone&email, • and year(s) and term of engagement. TAB 4 Experience&Qualifications of the Team 4.1 Qualifications of Proposer's Individual Team Members (Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart which indicates, at a minimum,the principles of the firm,account representatives and individual team members to be assigned to any award by the City of Miami Beach pursuant to this RFQ. Include details on the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein 'andeach team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience,and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract, THIS SECTION IS NOT DIRECTED AT SUB-CONSULTANTS. SUB-CONSULTANTS ARE NOT TO BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. 4.1.1 Project Experience. For each architect and engineer (Firm's individual team members), include information for three (3) relevant projects,'performed in the last five (5) years for public or private sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in Appendix C. Submit'atleast three (3) small projects (as defined in Section 3°.1above) relevant to the category of • work, for which the proposal has been submitted, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of requested experience, preferably to public or private sector agencies. For each small project submitted,the following is required: •. project name . • project description, • • 'agency/client name, • • agency/client contact, • • contact telephone&email, • ' • and year(s) and term of engagement. TAB 5 , Required Forms 5.1 Standard Form 330.The proposing firm shall submit a completed Standard From 330 (attached). No proposal will be considered without this required form. In addition to experience and qualifications considerations,the City may use this information to consider the firm's previous and current workload. • 4. FINANCIAL CAPACITY. Within three (3) business days of request by the City, each Proposer shall arrange for Dun &Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report RFQ 2018-141-ND • • MIAMI BEACH from D&B at: https:/lsupplierportal.dnb.com/webapplwcs/stores/servlet/SupplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposers are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each Proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in th'e solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process,contact Dun &Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION. After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposers (or Proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to,annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). • • • • • RFQ 2018-141-ND V I I B E " C H Procurement Department 1755 Meridian , Floor, Miami Beach,Florida 33139 • www.miamibeachfl,gov it • Exhibit B Revised Appendix C, Minimum Requirements & Specifications • RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#5 4/13/2018 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements.The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below, Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Firms. Firms must be certified by the Florida Department of Business and ProfessionalL • Regulation as architecture or engineering business. 2. Architects/Engineers. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation for their area of work. C2. Statement of Work Required. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select multiple firms within each category that may be contacted on an "as-needed basis" during the term of the contract to submit consulting proposals on small projects whose estimated construction value is less than the amount established in Category 5, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently$325,000 or as amended by law) or for a planning or study activity valued up to the amount established in Category 2, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes(currently$35,000 or as amended by law).. The categories of work shall include: •Architecture-General •Architecture-Landscape •Engineering-Environmental Services and Testing 'Engineering-Mechanical, Electrical &Plumbing •Engineering-Electrical •Engineering-Plumbing • •Engineering-Mechanical •Engineering-Structural • •Engineering-Civil •Interior Design I Space Planning •LEED Commissioning •Surveying • The Administration will negotiate with a consultant(s)deemed to best qualified for the project based on an hourly rate (see Appendix E) or on a negotiated lump sum basis per project. If agreement is reached with the consultant for a specific project, a Consultant Service Order(CSO) will be issued, along with a Purchase Order(PO). No work is authorized, nor shall the City be liable for payment, until the CSO and PO are issued. The select consultant will be required to perform the architectural and engineering services in accordance with the Master Agreement(Appendix E) and the CSO.The highest professional standards shall be utilized for all work. • RFQ 2018-141-ND 27 . r The selected consultant will be required to retain and be responsible for all sub-consultants necessary to achieve the assigned scope of work. Sub-consultants shall be included in the CSO. The City may reject the use of any sub-consultant. • The services-authorized under the resulting Master Agreement, include(but are not limited to): Acoustics,Noise Abatement • Fire Protection • Air Pollution Control • Heating;Ventilating;Air Conditioning • Auditoriu'ms and Theaters i • Interior Design;Space Planning • Automation;Controls;Instrumentation • Irrigation;Drainage • .Boundary Survey • Landscape Architecture • Codes;Standards;Ordinances • Lighting(Interior,Display,Theater,etc.) • Communications Systems;TV;Microwave • Lighting(Exterior,Streets,Memorials,Athletic Fields, • • Conceptual Studies etc.) • Construction Administration • Plumbing and Piping Design • Cost Estimating • Recreation Facilities(Parks,Marinas,etc.) • Energy Conservation/Energy Sources • Rehabilitation, Remodel, Renovate (Buildings, • Electrical Structures,Facilities,etc.) • • General Environmental Services: • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies;OSHA Studies o Environmental Assessments • Security Systems;Intruder&Smoke Detection o Air and Water quality testing and • Soils&Geologic Studies;Foundations monitoring • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring . o Environmental sustainability planning • Structural Design;Special Structures services • Surveying,Mapping,GIS,and other services: o Environmental support services to • Platting;Mapping;Flood Plain Studies • achieve and maintain regulatory • Roofing Assessments,Replacements, compliance • Swimming Pools • Contamination Assessment: • Topographical Survey o Environmental Site Assessments • Urban Renewals;Community Development o Oversee and coordinate remedlation • Value Analysis;Life-Cycling Costing project • Any other professional services normally considered o Preparation of sampling and remediation under the disciplines of architecture and engineering. plans and other related documents • Improve Building Performance o Other associated tasks related to regulatory compliance The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes, as well as any other applicable law or regulation. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction ' management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach with all applicable local,state and federal regulations. C3.Term of Contract_It is expected that any resulting agreement shall be valid for a term of three (3) years from effective date. The City Manager may approve two (2) additional one (1) year renewal periods based on satisfactory performance. C4.Fee Standards: For determination of project fees the City will use the Design Professional Fee Guidelines for `Basic" Architectural and Engineering Services available at https://fp.state.fl.us/docs/DMSAEFeeGuidedefinition.asp RFQ 2018-141—ND 28 MI /tI B EC� Procurement Department /�' �/ 1 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO.4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS (the RFQ) April 11, 2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined), 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for receipt of submittals is extended until 3:00 p.m., Monday, April 23,2018,at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late submittals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below; with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext.6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to•acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Pros ective Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. c ly, • AxDes rocu. ent Director • • RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#3 4/11/2018 MI /� Procurement Department I�l/n 'V 1 1755 Meridian Ave,3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • ADDENDUM NO.3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS(the RFQ) . March 28,2018 • This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). 1. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for receipt of submittals is extended until 3:00 p.m., Monday, April 16,2018,at the following location: •• City of Miami Beach • Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late submittals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which.the Proposer is solely responsible. A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado .305-673-7000 ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Prosp- ' : Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. c:re is (woo,- `"'—o urement Director 1 RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#3 3/28/2018 • ,A/v\ B EAC H Procurement Department 1700 Convention Center ,Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS (the RFQ) March 6,2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City.The RFQ is amended In the following particulars only. • 1. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-In Sheet A FORTHCOMING ADDENDUM WILL CONTAIN RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext.6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Prospective Bidders°questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. i c' rely, Ale/ PK Pr�� ement Director • • , RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#2 3/6/2018 Iv\ I /\ ' fIEAC � Procurement Department /�1/ �/ , I 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • • Exhibit A • Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-1n Sheet • RFD No.2018-141-ND Addendum#2 3/6/2018 M1A IBEACI 1 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 27,2018 TITLE: RFQ-2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR EC CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS liM4S4� e� �: p VA '�'Y^r} .tr �� �. 1 & ^nf c tt f z. '.L r"s h i ' [3 4t`4¢ 1�, 'a�Ir"y isa i � .j j l� l�5 Af�-l� tt' k,=-4 : ;� t vT '^'t, 1 � f�. # .,n . a y}t t.t � LPf)���� {� nditlr0 k ik (PLi�'Yt`t5�i1Piur,'�T o „' hi �1 $ ��s t c. i �r "Ntt 1 ' 7 [-.11 tt, aF , ri w.tai k`" Itibmg. SA d t � A � .Sct eit �"' . �,a ��'�ii � � . ..,9� .i net.. tree w.,M Y. ?3'�.,�,z� �+r»9..,�r iv,m,...}41. ���d4.,�I, ''s5i �, " +7 '' Natalia Delgado Procurement-CMB 305-673-7000 nataliadelgado@rniamibeachfl.gov Ext.6263 a m p�aE:ar� 305-673- -jOOC, 1,s,--,x-i--44 - -cb arae s rK.c-+6.4.1,...,4 d M.:m..n:6aa6 fl. `' c 0aU' x 2997 aifia- VFerletia e i q;0,ri.1feathSt 10t4 6102 0Ed I) �p/2� a„,,\,S (/L 450e. _(5.Irc�wr.,)1 3° /6/ - „,--- ..-------1 /` K boVex e claizo,, sedncx.h�2 3NSo x-4. sea ,A,000 _ d3oS -�'d@bbam,Qmt. covvL. - T7G� -a�"Gtr�y bouc�oi L- s2;too- Ex4. !05 c•ViR6 ft-•1 MG. mss, krIsrk 00 N Qua CaINL n.. 3°5 _ 96i- W--7 Mg e- Sti-R-14 a Dka u n m ev 4,42,14 0►flQvac- ren -yur, . _ f (,) 590- (04r ZA,L �7Gv-veli� -j��ravi.ct,sco.6a-,rz is 1'4 •ti._ ,_cit A 26 Oso 0P34 a,r'fie rhea-Ani do 7%,L/sr.eorr7 e a&4evc\ er\kSI NNi vt rq L-later S vmeti Tbk.a0 . c�vlo�.lc n. PCr.S}errP�-cath g 3 - Si - l 1 - • IA IEA H _CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET — DATE: February 27,2018 TITLE: RFQ-2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS 04411.:41a011 % N aP ' C4 , 1� uglYMY'+4ctA0.ad#A0 � 9 {FR'''''; Rii,,i.,: , �`»w,pI#„y,. � 1C ' att kqY ' S! i a t” ASLPIYy :tAi ti j ' �k, ,, P,` .x .. ip e . . 4 .::e. YtLi .1, Dit.w. dSMv.+ Wrr lw{ �tiv0q Y Dg g E:JG-14E Y.s kND hecl+rr¢rs SE- gm!A Si DD tazog ss 11,D I Qc-was-eve.,conA -7-86'4414 t za ¢.icc AY/q9 �Q� �ngi,�t2l~s 4,44 A�cI+rJlee�s .4(,-441-81100 haat,`oie bB-E,dna.eom. 6 - -'( M oCzr CkiSJ /Nt00 /loCt 1 [�rt�ntoe2 @ Cttre0A to onr.co}N 3a��62 'y�3 .A✓ . . F k{-c`€n (Jai hNNtuu-yJ 95-uo-78, VPc-ZgcZ • AoSe e MCEaQGt.nt-i 2 .cat{ U 1.S0f • NICpl anA1Li2o9DU 1A105enU;Ty•coM 20E- 3 ��."$7A (AbG �j- ; i CAZ- ry i I A;A (\q ert i-., Aran 1 VeS. RnotVeAtIa N tk1J Q rl t Kt Cr2U t}4}ct. eziro (9,54')1/0`7967r • • L-�a�r� @vbllatrt�lc-ca f, �13)26i667 3\ 1E (11MFJV)`Z -- (j DES1GN Ge,WtP Ws-57690, 5GE--DBE - -TS'Sp p66“,iu Ess.4,80 6e[uP , +rnA Ez 0TsAa. 8St6u.cDM sou-AQGNR ,. WC. Sot-PtZ- 4, ttJc_. 3oc7400113 SOT 7400'ti8 bQ soL-AP- -I- .cor-t .Z-0.ifti2 ?c,%".^ M0(k.c--kk Nichol "ted-3 t9-2.3Sz J ea.bo,®tom(ZcAkoZtAnol .c...m eggiel0 QVII .. 12 ,45t fif, o9-66.i bFil. vPg 6aA&4z3 /kge Hca t oi. wDT rcA.S� t0h44p(. c{Li 2 co Wt. MIAMI BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ? PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING • SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 27,2018 TITLE: RFQ-2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS 7 R {r 6 m3 e i n@ v'3� ' rt � A ya6 � �S f ey � , r ' rIiE & r °N RyMvtoxi . . 4 :4 ai�" 1 C\ ->cakc,. \_ccjww.o c - t— G`Corio. )rr}eWIC.Ane.F- 3os Srss 17 4. t E 305 �f63�'�f�i Y you las T„n7rS,-1 La'idsc Di Poo- 0 LA.-JscupelD ; Gar,,.. sos=2Is--76?3 L , i l,.~�wn I & (iJ:1): Avv, 1,61/1, c.11-ce 305.vm(o• �I�►e�c��Il;awLlG�v�er �wI �� �`� a`'otn trinGMII c. .cAn�, 31[7S, cC£k 1i�SpoiNDL A 5 Ns10bn TCA$5 Gs141-111La'r irrs, iLKeR UZUI�l G� '�Z�n 30'527440o5 3052714507 Cmc-phco rp.C.0 PA Luc:-P15 TEg.ct.Pc LoN . &7&) .o50-6iPc1Fg.T—rg�� x/363 LAZA 5•3AKez,S�0-1- 4G�Conl,t'6,� l-LPe.az,• CA/ZKera°,Pi? out C41u2-2E 5cv-(”-{"i.i IP.rikd-S s0c-2S(c aa,,ranaPdcs�—ae.e�, °lo7j c cAAtalta, �, � �nor1-1- 5Gl-6oI (403)806- i., &Ai-Zq,ve� rO�m2u `` 1 rS3 i$22 chin elti'ive-/ ( een/ifenmen-N:149m 1i0? 1-608 6p� N\IL°, ral i+e cfv re P-dl- c:%,; NL—V(L ' , 3Nevi)1 cie7od ov.cuvr-, -2.2,5 _ ..c. ,....... 3 . MIAMIBEACH C CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 27,2018 TITLE: RFQ-2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS 3�K���> t 0 4cii , 14 5� ,;;,,,,,1,1:0,0,? MrfiL ' 5 j sF : . •a D}} .,..1.,,k1--.:04.,..i._.4., :,.. 1 SAT i , � y £ A : i 0S' a , V N : . .,: .1 ' rn ' ',',:' .i§ 4a,,t1, .•1 dA I ! s, rvet 1914*— ... Veb ad oleo@©cecuAU)orJd eau k000 Cly 1 r't AtsOL\int-iS 3 66-7— uo}tQ( vis-einvi'viutt�-G42 ��� ��tnry e,-I 1&i tri,h -186-ZQ5.1 SRCf qc/�t-r,3 eg J 1"E AA•e a— �Y::: -t_ L nor/1 305-c13t{- Z 3O - - o EtYnO �i ' I 3or--3-t5•-•'=r1 50 � +nckv1 e- 3 ca ckl-ekifir.covyn N g`9A o-te(e-a H A KS,rcng„1Gacs,Artt..-1-aci-s 4(.,,,d ci r „t o-riRo 0 HA 1=5.N t~7• '19t,.22q.2o61 4"1:'4A Kum bila 14r C`MSLA-LNI--Y,1-5 � — �/ Klarnguat-0.. ,lsi` e.,,A-TAaw .- �`�u�-StG 18s73�S`(�'2'+ b Rtcrud2 t cLCiVA teiSKLE-i070 ('"_It'iuktcrti✓1 c . I 395-30-//2$ AA MtduvAA @ nas KALti9")-C. Cort -`1 TJQQ-Voeo �E�.st-1, —I A- 3D5 L14-b tl$--1 VOS{'i SARIN, sO N it- 5A9.t1iE*0To@ 930u-sooHE¢• H•wM X -lo-b -C)071:'(1'.' v:. e D-sC rlf; +s/4 0,1e,_Wr1 ;,5.zc.1"1- 14 elf 9055 �breie01051-U(ch,(Dm 305-71-1l6677 P10551 o,,Aec 2 t 0Qsi`�/7 G-, ;o, D -C-4V -i£ -" 9i)l•3�•183 WUAN-As C S� tuu a0AFt ch tech" . 4 MIAMBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: February 27,2018 'TITLE: RFQ-2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ' t1 ‘ 7. Airtractrftr fakage,,s , F.41wri, 0.1- at*ZiV 7:` • pfi,;;; -yl: cvrfft 1/in-) OM VI te.)(2, 50phla 4kuir\' SAvdto . . 1 ij • , ...\ksi-I-Cri 4119 Gird 4'\ a)te-S, te \14 It t Qin 012)&9-q h , \KIllitarn tAeckolito A.26,)14-e,Q* A---71\c‘t • I \bg\g-sSO 4e-t1eksz " ClgORIARWa) 2.Ctnaff:JP _ • scri--.1-(12, KG.k.h‘ e9st_n Krell . :, upll ova guyesonsullt..no Sehrti T-03a-b1e), Q0-1-1-elexua, 02P.)(-1 tIe.R_Ak3e.QJ (7--) ina6.112) c7:77.c42,-0-0,(1 t Ot tALSOk ebrl eiov co-A kuta-I-- 2i1Q 3&o. S ,ked,I tee.-1- CIOCA-0-e2" r- 21-610i Ern 1‘...ati24-X‘C\ 2 MIAMIBEACH • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING • SIGN-IN SHEET • DATE: February 27,2018 TITLE: RFQ-2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS .__ —11144V4',#"11"04, ttitr;.',t 144:147-044•111140.RA rigitiiidaii':'..\l'•"7"!'•!•.,TL'4.W.....;;'' ----'-- -:, iiw44'4, R ‘.41- "digt ifiriVr S� Sy4131:'� t:�jM9 ;t. 11r 111 .A �, {11:--1:,-, ..: 'RI ....9 oQQ-e-J f\1 Dc-e)(\1#e-c.4- �MCtrcik)Pte- .i__1,-.0.._- SsAof-et tL r9,0 .t?gaJe) T' - Aan a1S5c...ta42.S- G 1S J Com"S Ztl s _ Cns,J +t S. �-,c cw1 Qd 4.J.ki t s 1-aiJ s , C 14-e cwt-s. -±r) . l unar 0 a -e0 1 49-5t._.) 1.2-k O_Al,t 4-2c -s 0 . api SO n 4\t -k5S-1.s-1-c c' - V-4-.Qna z e,ezL)p. ,I.. o.)rN, . - . (c\--G i • •i • 3 MIProcurement Department I %'1'f� /�V 1 . 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO.-1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2018-141-ND • PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACMENT PROJECTS(the RFQ) February 26,2018 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City.The REQ is amended in the following particulars only. • -1. REVISION: Section 0200— Instructions to Respondents &General Conditions, 5. Pre-Proposal Meeting or Site Visit(s) on page 4 of the RFQ, is hereby amended as follows. (deletions are shown by strikethrough and _ _. additions_are underlined).:__._._ _ . . Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the • following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers Interested in participating.in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 1112614 9415468 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office •at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov • Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext.6263 .nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt 'of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the"Notice to Prospective Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. • fly, i exDeb12 � •. � rocur- ent Director RFQ No.2018-141-ND Addendum#1 • 2/26/2018 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS, ( RFQ ) PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS RFQ 2018-141-ND { RFQ ISSUANCE.DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2018 RESPONSES DUE: APRIL 2, 2018 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: NATALIA DELGADO MIAMIBEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3RD Floor, Miami. Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901` www.miarnibeachfl.gov MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE. 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS &GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 , SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS&FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 15 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 17 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 24 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS&SPECIFICATIONS . 26 APPENDIX D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 29 APPENDIX E SAMPLE CONTRACT 31 APPENDIX F STANDARD FORM 330 62 RFQ 2018.-141-ND 2 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications(RFQ)is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"),as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their'qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost.Proposals (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms,conditions and obligations of the Proposer and,subsequently,the successful proposer(s)(the"contractor[s]")if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.DublicDurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. On.September 28, 2004, through Resolution 2004-24697, the City Commission created the Capital Renewal and Replacement Program (the "CRR Program"). The intent of the CRR Program is to provide funding a proactive renewal and replacement of the City's facilities and the systems within those facilities (e.g., HVAC,,roofs, fire safety systems,etc). The CRR is also used for approved for small repair, remodel or renovation projects,usually expected to cost less than$325,000.The average value of the current CRR Projects is approximately$158,000,but can be as low as$25,000 or less. In addition to CRR projects, award(s)of this RFQ may also be used for other small projects. Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly known as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA), is. applicable to the selection of professional services consultants (architecture, professional engineering, landscape architecture, or registered surveying and.mapping) by public agencies for projects valued up to the amount established in.Category 5, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently $325,000 or amended by law) or for a planning or study activity valued up to the amount established in Category 2; Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently$35,000 or as amended by law).THEREFORE,CCNA IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS RFQ. In'order to maximize the cost effectiveness of small projects, through this RFQ the City seeks to establish a pool of qualified'architectural and engineering consultants for those projects whose value is below the thresholds stipulated in CCNA. The categories of work are, as further defined in Appendix C, Architecture — General, Architecture — Landscape, Engineering— Environmental Services and Testing, Engineering— Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing, Engineering—Structural. Because of the nature and size of the small projects being considered under this RFQ, the City desires to engage firms with sufficient experience in small projects. 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation.Issued FEBRUARY 15,20.18 Pre-Submittal Meeting FEBRUARY 27,2018 @ 10:00AM'EST Deadline for Receipt of Questions MARCH 23,2018 @ 5:00 PM EST Responses Due APRIL 2,2018 @ 3:00 PM EST Evaluation Committee Review TBD RFQ 2.018-141-ND 3 i f MIAMI BEACH Proposer Presentations(if deemed necessary) TBD Tentative Commission Approval TBD 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact named herein, in writing,with a copy to the City Clerk's Office, Rafael E. Granado via e-mail: RafaelGranado(a.miamibeachfi.aov ; or facsimile: 786-394-4188.` The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date Proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3.'All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposer in the form of an addendum. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305.673.7000 Ext.6263 NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S).Only if deemed necessary by the City;a pre-proposal meeting or site Visit(s) mdy be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of'information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2)Enter the.MEETING NUMBER: 1142644 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become,familiar with,,the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable,.in the event of RFQ 2018-141-ND 4 MIAMI BEACH such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to,the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions,which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: htto://www.miamibeachfl.aov/city-hall/procurement/procurement-related-ordinance-and-procedures/ • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 DOMESTIC PARTNERS • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS& CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 SERVICES 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10:COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS.This RFQ is subject to,and all Proposersare expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation,disqualification of their responses,in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's.Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13.CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics ("Code") and submit that Code to the Procurement Department with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all, applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the,conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign RFQ 2018-141-ND 5 MIAMI BEACH language interpreters(five(5)days in advance when possible),or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works.Department, at 305-673-7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone ' the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers.through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation 'for selection of award in accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures,as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. . I 17. JOINT VENTURES. Joint Ventures are not allowed. Proposals shall be submitted only by the prime contractor who will serve as the CMR. The City will only'contract with the prime contractor who will serve as the CMR. Proposals may, however, identify other sub-contractors or sub-consultants to the prime.Proposer who may serve as team members. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374,the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent(5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and,such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD.The final ranking results of Step 1 &2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered bythe City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City'or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369,including the following considerations: (1)The ability,,capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference. (3)The,character, integrity,reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also,at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal j or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the.City,or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected.Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the. selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contractor legal rights of any kind shall be created at any lime until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to;approved by the City;and executed by the parties. RFQ 2.018-141-ND 6 MIAMI BEACH 21. POSTPONEMENT/CANCELLATION/ACCEPTANCEIREJECTION. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process;or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120);calendar days after proposal opening date.A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expirationof one hundred twenty(120)calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations,evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary,to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23.COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under,any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by.a Material Safety^Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination inthe opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during,the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 26.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State.taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing,and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications,free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. RFQ 2018-141-ND 7 MIAMI BEACH 29.COPYRIGHT, PATENTS& ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for,or on account of,any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention,process,or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device,or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT. Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility.Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property todeliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws:The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the. Proposer,or its officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32: SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from. these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status,and age or disability. 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City,including: A.Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment,and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. MENIMININEmEmirRFQ 2018-141-ND. 8 ItiI _ I MIAMI BEACH D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line the best business practices in the industry, and as determined by the City of Miami Beach. E.The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer,including past performance(experience),in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE.When the successful Proposer(s).is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES: In the event of a conflict between the documents,the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: i A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the awardof this solicitation;then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest.Addendum taking precedence;then C. The solicitation;then D. The Proposer's proposal in response tothe solicitation. 40.INDEMNIFICATION.The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense,. which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating)to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith,and shall investigate and defend all claims,suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable,including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless'and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein.provided.Theabove indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the RFQ 2018-141-ND 9 • , MIAMI BEACH stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including,without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a),Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to.be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to(a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public • agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS. Proposers are expected to be familiar with,and comply with,all Federal,State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF.INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal toreplace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall beirrevocable until contract,award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date,or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date,and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ,and outline what,if any,alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which. Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS,SERVICES.Proposers shall not offer any gratuities,favors,or anything of RFQ 2018-141-ND 10 MIAMI BEACH monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449.of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift,favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in thedischarge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.Although this solicitation and resultant contractidentifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work.When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), asapplicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s)that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order.if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases,.the City may deem it necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract,to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2018-141-ND 11 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Proposal (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals.Additionally,ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Proposals received electronically, either through email or facsimile,are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Proposals are to be received on or before the due dateestablished herein for the receipt of proposals. Any proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of Proposals will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. PROPOSAL FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Proposals, it is strongly recommended that Proposals be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below.Hard copy submittal should be tabbed0400 as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Proposals that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1' Cover Letter&Table of Content 1.1 Cover Letter. The cover letter must be signed by a principal or agent able to the bind the firm and contain the following: (a) Prime Proposer. Include the name and location of the Prime Proposer, Primary Proposer's Representative for the RFQ, Representative's Contact.Joint Ventures are not allowed under this RFQ. . (b) Selected Category of Work.Proposer must indicate the category of work for which proposal is submitted. Categories of Work, include: Architecture — General; Architecture — Landscape; Engineering — Environmental; Engineering—Mechanical, Electrical&Plumbing; Engineering—Structural. Proposers shall submit separate proposals for each category of work for which a proposal is submitted. Example: a firm which,provides general architecture and landscape architecture shall submit one proposal for Architecture—General and a separate'and distinct proposal for Architecture.—Landscape. 'TAB 2 -.' " . Minimum Requirements 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C Minimum Requirements and Specifications,including a) Architect / Enaineerina Firm. Provide copies of that thefirm is certified by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation to do business in Florida. b) Principle and Account Representatives. For the principle and account representative(s) submitted under Tab 2 below, submit copies that individuals are licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation to do business in Florida.Proposer should also submit copies of architect/engineer license for all licensed firm employees. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications of the Firm 2.1 Standard Form 330.The proposing firm shall submit a completed Standard From 330 (attached). No proposal will be considered without this required form.. In addition to experience and qualifications considerations,the City may use RFQ 2018-141-ND 12 MIAMI BEACH this information to consider the firm's previous and current workload. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposing Firm.Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing architecture or engineering services, preferably to public sector agencies,for non- residential small projects(construction costs below$325,000 and planning/studies below$35,000). Submit at least five (5) small projects relevant to the category of work for which the proposal has been submitted, performed in the last five (5) years as evidence of requested experience, preferably to public sector agencies. For each small project submitted, the following is required:. • project name, • • - project description, • agency/client name, • agency/client contact, • contact telephone&email, • and year(s)and term of engagement 2.3 Financial Capacity. Following the bid opening and at the request of the City proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualifier Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein. No proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City,of the SQR directly from Dun&Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: httos://suoolierportal.dnb.comlwebaoo/wcs/stores/servlet/SuoolierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun &.Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. 2.3.1 Audited Financial Statements. In lieu of a D & B SQR, the Proposer may submit its latest audited financial statements.which must be dated December 31,2014 or later. •TAB3. Experience&Qualifications of the Team 3.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team(Architects and Engineers). Provide an organizational chart which indicates,at a minimum, the principles of the firm and the account representatives,assigned to award by the City of Miami Beach pursuant to this RFQ. Include details on the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team,members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information,shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 3.1.1 Project Experience. For each architect and engineer, include information for three(3)relevant projects, performed in the last five (5) years for public or private sector clients. Relevant projects shall include those projects similar in scope to those services listed in Appendix C. Submit at least three (3) small projects (as defined in Section 2.1 above) relevant to the category of work for which the proposal has been submitted, performed in the last five (5)years as evidence of requested experience, preferably to public or private sector agencies.For each small project submitted,the following is required: - • project name • project description, • agency/client name, • agency/client contact, • contact telephone&email, • and year(s)and term of engagement RFQ 20.18-141-ND 13 MIAMI BEACH Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or • proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2018-141-ND 14 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0400 PROPOSALS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee.An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set'forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. Itis important to note that the Evaluation Committee willscore the qualitative portionsof the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager.The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management.An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received,with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1'-Qualitative•Criteria ' Y'''< : - Maximum Points Experience of the Proposing Firm 50 Experience of the Team 50 TOTALAVAILABLESTEP,1 POINTS 100 ' ' I 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Procurement Department to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria ' • Maximum.Points • Veterans Preference 5 . ' ' : TOTAL AVAILABLESTEP2.POINTS 5._ RFQ 2018-141—ND 15 ' L MIAMI BEACH 4. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: • Proposer Proposer Proposer A . B C Ste• 1 Points 82 76 80 :Committee Ste 2 Points 22 15 12 Member I Total 104 91 92 .. . .:Rank'•:.:,•1-, -.1`: •-;;v4'.-.;,,%, ',1'; ?-:.r 3 i '-.,cf: ::',,;,-•,:'-_ Ste• 1 Points 79 85 72 'Committee: Ste•2 Points 22 15 12 Member2 Total 100 84 Ste• 1 Points 80 74 66 Commlade: : Ste•2 Points 22 15 12 Member 2 •• Total 102 89 78 :Rank ,--.';.1,,, 1; ,.. ` i2. '- ';;'',3, Low Aggregate Score ' :t: . 3 7 8 I Final'Ranking: ., . "_ -, '1' 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. i V RFQ 2018-141-ND i 16 APPENDIX A , MIAMI Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit { RFQ No. 2018- 141„ -N.D 11 PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL .AND { ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SMALL PROJECTS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian.Avenue, 3rd Floor • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018-141-ND 17 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305.673.7000,Ext.6263 NATALIADELGADO anMIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: • FAX NO:: - FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity,of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2018-141—ND 18 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Proposer claimin a veteran owned business status? P YES J NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business statusshall submit a documentationproving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent,or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also-an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%).percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami.Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, thefollowing information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension, Debarment,or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance b an public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES, Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. . Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,,the City's Campaign Finance Reform. laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the'City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,'and shall besubject to any and all sanctions,as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling'financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with:its • proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at minimum,require the Proposer,;to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,.available at htto://www.miamibeachfl.dov/citv-halllorocurement/ RFQ 2018-141—ND 19 • �I I 7. _ benefits: benefits. *1 • bcnofits. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES 11.11 NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the°other"section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at httpalwww.miambeachfl.00vlcity=trall!orocurementloroc irement-rel ated-ordinance-and- procedures! RFQ '2018-141—ND 20 • I 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit:a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO fora period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Pursuant to Section 2-376 of the City Code,the City shall not enter into any contract resulting from a competitive solicitation, unless the proposer certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in Article V of Chapter 62 of the City Code("Fair Chance'Ordinance"),and which, amongother things,(i)'prohibits City contractors, as an employer, from inquiring about an applicant's criminal history until the applicant is given a conditional offer Of employment; (ii) prohibits advertising of employment positions with•a statement that an individual with a criminal record may not apply for the position,and(iii)prohibits placing a statement on an employment application that a person with a criminal record may not apply for the position. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required at this time. By virtue of executing this affidavit, Proposer certifies that it has adopted policies,practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance. Proposer agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request. Proposer further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract, and shall entitle the City to the immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition to any damages that may be available at law and in equity. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every • Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the.Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. • Initial to Confine Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2018-141—ND 21 - I DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviates from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its.sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto,are approved and executed by the parties,and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications,and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation..Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2018-141—ND 22 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto,and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound,to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposier's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: . Date: State of FLORIDA ) , On this_day of ,20_,personally • appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed.Before,me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: • • 1i +iI RFQ 2018-141—ND 23 APPENDIX B ' A MIAMI BEACH No Bid" Form fi RFQ No. 2018- 141 -ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SMALL • PROJECTS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 ofe: It, for those vendors who have received notificationof this solicitatfon,but have.decided.not torespond,,to complete and submit the cttached ;,`Statement of Na Bidf The "'Statement of No Bid" provides' the rcitY with information on how to improve 'the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified'. of future solicitations by the City. RFQ 2018-141-ND • 24 • Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal _Insufficient time to respond _ Specifications unclear or too restrictive _ Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements _Unable to meet insurance requirements _Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. • PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: NATALIA DELGADO PROPOSALS#2018-141-ND 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 • i RFQ 2018-141-ND 25 } APPENDIX C MIAMI Minimum Requirements -& Specifications RFQ No. �201. 8-141 -ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL. RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018.-141-ND 26 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Firms. Firms must be certified by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation as architecture or engineering business. 2. Architects/Engineers. Architects and engineers must be licensed by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation for their area of work. C2.Statement of Work Required. It is the intent of the City of Miami Beach to select multiple firms within each category that may be contacted on an "'as-needed basis" during the term of the contract to submit consulting proposals on small projects whose estimated construction value is less than the amount established in Category 5, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes (currently$325,000 or as amended by law) or for a planning or study activity valued up to the amount established in Category 2, Section 287.017, Florida Statutes(currently$35,000 or as amended by law).. The categories of work shall include: •Architecture—General •Architecture—Landscape •Engineering—Environmental Services and Testing •Engineering—Mechanical,Electrical&Plumbing •Engineering—Structural •Engineering—Structural •Interior Design/Space Planning, •LEED Commissioning The Administration will negotiate with a consultant(s)deemed to best qualified for the project based on an hourly rate(see Appendix E)or on a negotiated lump sum basis per project. If agreement is reached with the consultant for a specific project,a Consultant Service Order(CSO)will be issued, along with a Purchase.Order(P0).No work is authorized, nor shall the City be liable for payment, until the CSO and PO are issued. The select consultant will be required to perform the architectural and engineering services in accordance with the Master Agreement(Appendix E)and the CSO.The highest professional standards shall be utilized for all work. RFQ 2018-141-ND 27 The selected consultant will be required to retain and be responsible for all sub-consultants necessary to achieve the assigned scope of work. Sub-consultants shall be included in the CSO. The City may reject the use of any sub-consultant. The services authorized under the resulting Master Agreement,include(but are not limited to): • Acoustics,Noise Abatement • • Fire Protection • Air Pollution Control • Heating;Ventilating;Air Conditioning, • Auditoriums and Theaters • Interior Design;Space Planning • Automation;Controls;Instrumentation • Irrigation;Drainage • Boundary Survey Lab Testing Services • Codes;Standards;Ordinances • Landscape Architecture • Communications Systems;TV;Microwave • Lighting(Interior,Display,Theater,etc.) • Conceptual Studies • Lighting(Exterior,Streets,Memorials,Athletic Fields, • Construction Administration etc.) • Cost Estimating • Plumbing and Piping Design • Energy Conservation/Energy Sources • Recreation Facilities(Parks,Marinas,etc.) • Electrical • Rehabilitation, Remodel, Renovate (Buildings, • General Environmental Services: Structures,Facilities,etc.) o Environmental Assessments • Safety Engineering;Accident Studies;OSHA Studies o Air and • Water quality testing and • Security Systems;Intruder&Smoke Detection monitoring • Soils&Geologic Studies;Foundations o Environmental sustainability planning • Storage Tank Repair and Monitoring services • Structural Design;Special Structures o Environmental support services to • Surveying,Mapping,GIS,and other services: achieve and maintain regulatory • Platting;Mapping;Flood Plain Studies compliance • Roofing Assessments,Replacements • Contamination Assessment: • Swimming Pools o Environmental Site Assessments • Testing&Inspection Services o Oversee and coordinate remediation • Topographical Survey project • Urban Renewals;Community Development o Preparation of sampling and remediation • Value Analysis;Life-Cycling Costing plans and other related documents • Any other professional services normally considered o Other associated tasks related to under the disciplines of architecture and engineering. regulatory compliance The selected architectural and/or engineering firms will be responsible for reviewing all existing City of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinances and Building Codes, as well as any other applicable law or regulation. The teams will be responsible for incorporating all the above data into complete construction documents, including final working drawings, specifications, and bid documents necessary for the bidding and construction of the project, and in some instances, for construction management. The construction documents and drawings must comply with the City of Miami Beach with all applicable local,state and federal regulations. C3. Term of Contract_It is expected that any resulting agreement shall be valid for a term of three (3) years from effective date. The City Manager may approve two (2) additional one (1) year renewal periods based on satisfactory performance. C4. Fee Standards: For determination of project fees the City will use the Design Professional Fee Guidelines for "Basic" Architectural and Engineering Services available at httos://fp.state.fl.us/docs/DMSAEFeeGuidedefinition.aso RFQ 2018-141—ND 28 APPENDIX D j1 MIAMI Insurance 'Requirements • .. . RFQ No. 2018- 141 -N D PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 •RFQ 2018-141-ND 29 { INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability(occurrence form), limits of liability$500,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products,Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability - $100,000 each occurrence. - owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies;and it must be stated on the certificate. XXX 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 _Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond - $ .00 XXX Other:Professional Liability $1,000,000.00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better,latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and,title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self- insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution,and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 2018-141-ND 30 - I APPENDIX E MIAMI BEACH SAMPLE CONTRACT RFQ No. 20•18-141 -ND • PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT . • • . PROJECTS 'PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2018-141-ND - • 31 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING SERVICES { FOR THE X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Resolution No. RFQ 2018-141-ND 32 ( AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. DISCIPLINE: RESOLUTION NO. ( RFQ 2018-141-ND 33 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS - I DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 36 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 40 ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 45 ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 46 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 48 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 49 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 49 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 50 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 50 ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 51 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 52 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 53 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 53 ARTICLE.14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 54 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE .54 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ....,_... 54 RFC 2018-141-ND 34 • SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 58 SCHEDULE B 59 SCHEDULE C 61 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A Error! Bookmark not defined. ATTACHMENT B Error! Bookmark not defined. ATTACHMENT C Error! Bookmark not defined. RFQ 2018-141-ND 35 �{ AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED-BASIS" - This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 2016 , (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and a Florida corporation having its principal office at (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: - ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS • 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: - ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services"shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in. Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager, or designee(s), or his authorized designee,prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID: "Base Bid" shall mean theelements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City)as being within the Construction Cost Budget. "Base Bid" shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services" shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order.. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. RFQ 2018-141-ND 36 CITY(OR OWNER): The"City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In'the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works. Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction,.the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission"shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The "City Manager, or designee(s)," shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager, or designee(s), shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager, or designee(s), in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET: The "Construction Cost Budget" shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project("Construction Cost"), as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant-has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdictionin accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the,Contract Documents. However,approval`by the City shall not in any be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's,obligations to ensure the Construction. Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws 'and in accordance with the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT:' The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement„ the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional'has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through.Subconsultants acceptable to the City),all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order andwill serve as the "architect of record" and/or"engineer of record"for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural,, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("Subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permittedin this Agreement. Further, any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations. with jurisdiction governing the professional ,practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services,in connection with the Project. The Subconsultants in Schedule"C",attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager, RFQ 2018-141-ND 37 or designee(s),for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services)which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in the RFQ. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below) and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Manager, or designee(s), CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Invitation to Bid (ITB), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction"shall mean thelegally binding agreement between City and Contractor for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including,. without limitation, a general contractor, construction manager, design-builder or any other duly licensed construction contractor selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation, joint venture; or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN 'CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP: "Design Criteria Package" meansconcise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build .Project, prepared for the purpose of, furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to preparea bid or a response to a City request for proposal, or to. permit the City to enter into a negotiated design-build contract. The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project, including the legal description of the site, survey information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality standards, schematiclayouts and conceptual design criteria of the project, cost or budget estimates, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for utilities, stormwater retention and disposal, and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all plans, .drawings specifications, schematics and all \ other documents which 'set forth in full thedesign of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size, configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100% completed, permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including, without limitation, all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate. Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a) the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents. However, approval by the City shall not in any way be construed, interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible, in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the.Contract Documents. RFQ 2018-141-ND _. 38 FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistibleforce occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have,or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the,rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreementand which, by the exercise of duediligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid, provided, however, that inclement.weather(except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction. process.shallnot be:considered a Force Majeure: If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim. by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof: PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost: The "Project Cost", shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as prepared and established by the City, including the estimated Construction Cost and Soft Costs. The Project Cost may, from time to time, be revised or adjusted by the City, in its sole discretion, to accommodate approved modifications or changes to the Projector scope of work. Proiect Scope: The "Project Scope" shall mean the description of the Project, as described in the ConsultantServiceOrder. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: .. The"Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager,or designee(s), who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and°notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters conceming the Services of this Agreement(exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager, or designee(s), or City Commission under this Agreement or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over'the Project). { PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal. Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreementand made a pact hereof; provided, however; that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this. Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail Consultant's proposal in response to, the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to. provide thekey personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent'with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" Shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Consultant,Service Order Schedule B Consultant.Compensation and Hourly Billing Rate Schedule. Schedule C—Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services" shall include the Project Scope, Basic. Services, and any - - - RFQ 2018-141-ND _, .__ ' - 39 Additional Services (as approved by the.City), all.as described in Schedule"A" hereto. SERVICES:. "Services"shall mean all services,work,and actions by the Consultant performedpursuant to or undertaken under this,Agreement. SOFT COSTS:. "Soft Costs" shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without. limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that,are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST: The "Statement of Probable Construction. Cost" shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index'(CSl)format or other format approved by the Project Administrator, whichincludes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents, as they may be amended from time to time). The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and construction contingency for the Project. Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications,. surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully"functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. I ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES • 2..1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project,, specifically describedin the Consultant Service Order. ' 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant.upon receiptof a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager, or designee(s), or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. - 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws, The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effector as may be amended Or adopted fromtime to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant Warrants and represents to the City that -all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in the design of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed, (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and.represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical'accuracy of the Services (including, without limitation, the Design Documents contemplated in Schedule "A"'hereto). Consultant further warrants and represents that the approved and permitted Construction Documents shall constitute a representation.by Consultant to City that the 'Project, if constructed as required by the Contract Documents, will be fully functional, suitable and sufficient forits intended purposes. 2.5 ,The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, • RFQ 201$-141-ND 40 bidding/award, preparation of a DCP,studies, construction administration, and Additional Services(as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service. Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General.Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including, without limitation, any design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Construction Documents, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and the Construction Documents. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof,, and shall bein effect for three(3) years ("Initial Term")„ plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretionof the City Manager, or designee(s),. (Initial Term 'and any renewals shall'be collectively referred to as the"Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion .of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project,the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. The Consultant shall coordinate the Services with all of its Subconsultants, as well as other consultants, including,without limitation, City provided consultants(if any). 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of unduedelays resulting from untimely review:taken by the City(or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project)to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having,jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay;the requested adjustment(i.e. extension) to the Project Schedule;and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as 'the Project.Administrator may require), the RFQ 2018=141=ND 41 j Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project.Schedule. The.Project Administrator's approval (if granted)shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance,except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible: 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect,to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for; and shall represent.to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the.Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and re-performance of any non-conforming construction work,resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve(12) months following final acceptance of the'Work, (ii):or for the period of design liability required by applicable law, whichever is later. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.10.1 The' Consultant shall be responsible for deficient, defective Services and .any resulting deficient, defective construction work re-performed within twelve (12) months following final acceptance and shall be subject to further re-performance, repair and replacement for twelve (12) months from the date'.of initial re-performance, not to exceed twenty-four months (24) from final acceptance. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s) Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable.the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects; or whichare inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation. (and where applicable), via a set of marked-updrawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner.. The term °timely"shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under.the circumstances,taking intoaccount thetimelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout. RFQ 2018-141-ND -.- . .-.:.. 42 this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2:12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five(5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professionalto serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of-Consultant with-respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project.Manager(as well as'any replacement).shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager, or designee(s), or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager,, or designee(s), or his designee(i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager, or designee(s), or the Project Administrator(which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager,. or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project( including,without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager, or designee(s), or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to theproper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws;: or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City .and Consultant`acknowledge that the Services, as-described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate :every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service.Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services. and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort. originally anticipated. in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrators written consent before'proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service:Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such.work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project. Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability.. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any .and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request,with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completionof the.Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN'ANY WAY THE RFQ 2018-141-ND :- 43 J . CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION,;FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR,CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR. ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM,ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF F A.SIMILAR NATURE,THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: The Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, or designee(s)„ in response to a written_request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants,.the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon therequest of the City;submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation„standing, ownership and professional licensure of the. Consultant(and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the/Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way theterms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse,waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant and shall not be cause for any increase incompensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. RFQ 2018=141--ND ` 44 ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. The City Manager, or designee(s), shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in, no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligatedto verify to the extent it deems necessary allinformation furnished by the City, andthat it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all suchinformation used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual,examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to thereliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager, or designee(s), may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing. services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). I - 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes, aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non- conformance with, the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in.its proprietary capacity'as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in.writing,, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager, or designee(s), shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted. in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager, or designee(s), shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules,plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3:6.1 The City Manager, or designee(s), shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants(and any replacements). 3.6,2 The City Manager, or' designee(s), shall decide, and render administrative '(proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager, or designee(s), may also.consult with the City Commission on such matters: RFQ 2O'18-141-ND 45 1 3.6.3 At the: request of Consultant, the City Manager, or designee(s), shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward paymentof the Consultant; provided, however, that the:Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.6.4 The City Manager, or designee(s), may approve Contract Amendments. ' I 3.6.5 The City Manager, or designee(s), may, in his/her sole discretion, form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers; duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.6.6. The City Manager, or designee(s), shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.7 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall besolely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof,, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon'in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project, asset forth in the Consultant Service Order. Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded. As part of the .Basic Services, Consultant:shall design and/or re-design the Project to the • . Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget. Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discusscost estimates, cost-saving . alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items, as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2.. Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the.Construction Documents; unless otherwise specified in the Consultant.Service Order or other written directive of the.Project Administrator. 4.2.1. At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator), Consultant shall provide the Citya Statement of Probable Construction Cost;which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%) of the Construction Cost. Budget. If at the foregoing stage of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's.Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent(15%),then'the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then. identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design. Documents necessary'to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%) of the City's Construction Budget ' Upon obtaining City's'approval of any proposed modifications,'Consultant shall incorporate such'modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.2. At the 30% and 60% completion of 'the Design Documents, 'Consultant `shall update its RFQ 201.8-141-ND 0 - 46 , Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's. Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%), the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s) for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in. the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%) of the City's Construction Budget. Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications; Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the. Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3. At the 90% stage completion of the Design-Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents, Consultant shall update its. Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%) of the Construction Cost Budget. If at the foregoing stages of design the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%),. the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design. Documents necessary to conform the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%) of the City's Construction Budget. Uponobtaining the City's approval, Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within thetime period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4. To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed, the City's Construction Budget, each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be•in sufficient detailto identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees, general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3. Consultant shall certify and.warrant to the City that the Statementof.Probable Construction Cost and any.update thereto, represents Consultant's'best judgment of the Construction. Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry,. provided, however, that Consultant cannot (and does not) guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates Of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s) prepared(or otherwise provided) by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent(10%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant, and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope, construction schedule, sequence of Work, or such other action, as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost, and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents)within the time period specified by the Project Administrator(which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90) days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design); and' shall provide re-bidding services, as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City, as part of the Basic. Services and at no additional cost to the City, in order to bring any resulting, responsive and responsible bids Within ten'percent(10%)of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5. The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary, and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure) which are beyond the control of the parties. Any expenditure above this amount shall :be subject to prior City Commission approval which., if granted at all, =' shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission. The City Commissionshall have no obligation;to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and; if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded, the City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City.. RFQ. 2018-14.1-ND . 47 4.6. The City Commission may, at its sole and absolute discretion, and without relieving Consultant ofits obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4,1 through 4.5 above, separately elect any of the following options: (1) approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget (2) reject all bids, and (at its option) authorize rebidding of the Project (3)abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services withoutany further liability to the City; (4) select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator\(which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall,contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in. accordance with the rates in Schedule"B" hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any) with a "Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable). "Not to Exceed" shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteedmaximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets(and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals: Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing.facilities, and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which,could not reasonablyhave been,foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission,, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 52.3. City-Reauested Revisions to Construction Documents: Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes. in Scope of Work involving new program elements, when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness' Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoenato appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federalcourt action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 52.5 Procurement Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document.revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof,which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). ! 5.2.6: Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models.or renderings in addition 'to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the,provision of Basic'Services. RFQ 2018-141-ND 48 5.2.7. Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection: Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special 'inspection services, provided that Consultant, as part of the Basic Services, shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys & Testing: Environmental investigations and site evaluations, provided, however, that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering. Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. Except as specified herein, services that are-required-for-completion-of the Construction Documents_shall.be--- ---partofof Consultant's Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). - Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e.. City permit fees). ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Paymentsshall be made in proportion to the Services, satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress,percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowedon subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project.and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly rates setforth in Schedule "B," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Servicesshall be included with a Consultant payment request.. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). ` I RF.Q 2018-141-ND 49 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with.Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed"Reimbursable allowance amount in the Consultant Service Order hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: The initial hourly rates shall remainconstant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers;U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases,will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated; the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approvalof the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provideback-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work(by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records (whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or designee(s),,, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultants office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"J),during customary business hours.. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3)years after Consultants completion of the Services. Incomplete or'incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants, to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance, 'therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings', calculations, specifications, models; photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Servicesperformed or producedin the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic,form,:.paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details anddesigns owned by the.Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty(30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However,the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright.to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager, or designee(s), in RFQ' 2018-141-ND 50 • advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager, or designee(s),. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details,and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this"Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. }} 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager, or designee(s),. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification: 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all Subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative"body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding, either for the Services or the Project(or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, or designee(s),,, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1)violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty(30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from,the.City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the.City, at'its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise.The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s)incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City,. the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice).. Upon payment/of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3. As a condition precedent to release of.any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any RFQ' 2018-141-ND 51 and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consuitant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof): The City shall not-be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documentspursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR.CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, or designee(s)„ may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen:(14) days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience, without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty(30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however, that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination. (whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all. Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). • • ARTICLE 1t INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect. The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basisin an amount not less than $500,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned„ non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $100,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 with the deductible per claim, if any, not to exceed 10%of the limit,of liability. 11.2 The.City mustbe named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and'it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation or of substantial modifications in any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. RFQ 2018-141.-ND 52 • 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent; according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required. insurance policies.The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs,, including, but notlimited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any, kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, 'and save harmless and defend the City'or its officers,employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or`liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants'and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error,an omission, or any combination thereof in the.Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the, City for'errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from'the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages Caused by the error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result oferrors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing,to the applicable Assistant City Manager, or designee(s),. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the.Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing,to the City Manager, or designee(s),. The Project.Administrator and the Consultant shall abideby the decision of the City Manager,or designee(s),. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. RFQ;-2018=141-ND 53 - 1 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability forany such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees _ — -- that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall,be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in.Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager, or designee(s)),'s Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager, or designee(s), • With a-copy to: City Manager, or designee(s),'s Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Eric T. Carpenter„Assistant City Manager, or designee(s), All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws .of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial,without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S.. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE RFQ 2018-141-ND . - - - - . - 54 ' I TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants areemployed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the, City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right,to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bonafide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission; percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.. For the breach or violationof this,;subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover) the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift,,or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with. Section 1.19.07 (3) (ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection,, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records),, and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, or designee(s),, may disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project;.or upon a showing of good causebefore a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. ' 1 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements'in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agreesto. abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may' be amended from time'to time, by which the 'documents are, handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to :signan agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents _ l RFQ 2018-141-ND 55 • unless authorized by the City Manager, or designee(s)„ in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultant and its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its Subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. ff 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager, or designee(s),. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City(through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9—' PROVISION: OFITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein,, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide allsalaries, wages, materials,, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services.. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such' services for a fully functional Project which,when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able,to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary,'to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain.a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City,, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City'from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions. RFQ 2018-141-ND 56 • hereof or of any power or right hereinreserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained, herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same,formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. _ Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: CITY CLERK MAYOR Attest xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signature/Secretary Signature/President Print.Name Print Name { RFQ 2018-141-ND = _ 57 ' I SCHEDULE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND - i CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. _ for Consulting Services. TO: PROJECT NAME: Prosect Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES ON AN "AS-NEEDED" BASIS (RFQ XXXXXXXX) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: Total.From Previous Additional Service.Orders: $ . Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to.Date: $ City's.Project Date Coordinator/Manager . Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date ._ RFQ 2018-141=ND 58 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $XXXXXXXX Design Services* $XXXXXXXX _Bidding.and_Award_Services —_-__$XXXXXXXX i Construction Administration** $XXXXXXXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note**: Construction Administration will be paid on a monthly basis upon commencement of construction. In the event that, through no fault of the Consultant, Construction Administration services are required to be extended, which extension shall be subject to prior City approval, and what shall beat the City's sole discretion, the Consultant agrees to extend said services for$XXXXXX, per month, for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. RFQ 2018-141-ND 59 HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE (. Project Principal $172.50 Project Engineer(Coastal or $116.15 Other) Project Manager $138.00 Sr. Field Services Professional $116.15 Senior Civil Engineer $138.00 Field Services Professional $ 80.50 Civil Engineer $116.15 Threshold Inspector $138.00 Senior Electrical Engineer $138.00 Structural Special Inspector $109.25 Electrical Engineer $116.15 _Technical Editor $ 74.75 Senior Mechanical Engineer $138.00 Senior GIS Specialist $116.15 Mechanical Engineer - $116.1.5_-_ _GIS_Specialist. --$:=86.25_. _ Senior Structural Engineer $138.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist/Scientist $ 94.30 Structural Engineer $116.15 Landscape Designer $ 95.45. Senior Environmental Engineer $138.00 Planner $116.1.5 Environmental Engineer $116.15 Project Principal ('Structural Engineer) $172.50 Environmental Technician $ 74.75 Project Manager(Structural Engineer) $138.00 Environmental Specialist $ 63.25 CAD Technician (Structural) $ 63.25 Environmental Permit Specialist . $ 63.25 Traffic Engineers $116.15 Project Scientist $120.75 Cost Estimator $ 74.75 Senior Surveyor $138.00 Specifications Writer $ 63.25 Surveyor $116.15 Construction Administrator/Manager $ 94.30 Surveyor Support Staff $ 69.00 Senior Project Manager $138.00 Senior Architect $138.00 MEP Project Ernineer $138.00 Architect $116.15 Horticultural/maintenance Consultant $ 86.25 Senior Designer $138.00 Irrigation Engineer $ 94.30 Designer $ 95.45 Job Captain $ 92.00 Senior Urban Planner $138.00 Interior Designer . $ 95.45 Senior CAD Technician . $ .69.00 Principal/Director of Design $138.00 CAD Technician $ 63.25 Senior Landscape Architect $138.00 Landscape Architect $11.6.15 Clerical .$ 40.25 Administrative Assistant $ 40.25 Survey Crew Party of2 . $140.68 Survey Crew Party of 2 w/GPS $168.51 Survey Crew Party of 3 $1.70.44 Survey Crew Party of 3 w/GPS $197.01 Survey Crew Party of 4 $211.31 Survey Crew Party'of,4 w/GPS $250.13 Sr. Inspector(CEI) $103.50 Inspector(CEI, Field or Construction) $ 94'88 RFQ 2018-141--ND 60 SCHEDULE.0 APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS • { - i i RFQ 2018-141-ND • .61 APPENDIX F MIAMI BEACH STANDARD FORM 330 RFQ No. 2018-141. -N1D PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ2O18- 141 -ND - 62 L ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS • OMB Control Number: 9000.0157 Expiration Date: 11130/2017 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement-This Information collection meets the requirements of 44 USC§3507,as amended by section 2 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. You do not need to answer these questions unless we display a valid Office of Management and Budget(OMB)control number, The OMB control number for this collection is 9000-0157. We estimate that it wit take 29 hours(25 hours for part 1 and 4 hours for Part 2)to read the Instructions,gather the facts.and answer the questions. Send only comments relating to our time estimate,Including suggestions for reducing this burden,or any other aspects of this collection of Information to: General Services Administration,Regulatory Secretariat Division(MIV1CB),1800 F Street,NW Washington,DC 20405. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS Federal agencies use this form to obtain information from Architect-Engineer Services: Defined in FAR 2.101. architect-engineer(A-E)firms about their professional qualifications. Federal agencies select firms for A-E contracts on Branch Office: A geographically distinct place of business or the basis of professional qualifications as required by 40 U.S.C. subsidiary office of a firm that has a key role on the team. chapter 11;Selection of Architects Engineers,and Part 36 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation(FAR). Discipline: Primary technical capabilities of key personnel,as • The Selection of Architects and Engineers statute requires the evidenced by academic degree, professional registration, public announcement of requirements for A-E services(with certification,and/or extensive experience. some exceptions provided by other statutes),and the selection of at least three of the most highly qualified firms based on Firm: Defined In FAR 36.102. demonstrated competence and professional qualifications • according to specific criteria published in the announcement. Key Personnel: Individuals who will have major contract The Act then requires the negotiation of a contract at a fair and responsibilities and/or provide unusual or unique expertise. reasonable price starting first with the most highly qualified firm. The information used to evaluate firms is from this form and other SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS sources,including performance evaluations,any additional data • requested by the agency,and interviews with the most highly Part I-Contract-Specific Quallflcations qualified firms and their references. Section A.Contract Information. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Title and Location. Enter the title and location of the • contract for which this form is being submitted,exactly as shown Part I presents the qualifications for a specific contract in the publrc•announcement or agency request. •• • Part 11 presents the general qualifications of a firm or a specific 2. Public Notice Date. Enter the posted date of the agency's branch office of a firm. Part II has two uses: notice on the Federal Business Opportunity, website (FedBizOpps), other form of public announcement or agency request for this contract. 1. An A-E firm may submit Part Ii to the appropriate central, • regional or local office of each Federal agency to be kept on file. 3. Solicitation or Project Number. Enter the agency's A public announcement is not required for certain contracts,and solicitation number and/or project number, if applicable, agencies may use Part II as a basis for selecting at least three of exactly as shown in the public announcement or agency request the most highly qualified firms for discussions prior to requesting for this contract. submission of Part I. Firms are encouraged to update Part II on file with agency offices,as appropriate,according to FAR Part Section B. Architect-Engineer Point of Contact,. 36. If a firm has branch offices,submit a separate Part II for ( each branch office seeking work. 4-8. Name, Title, Name of Firm, Telephone Number, Fax j (Facsimile) Number and E-mail (Electronic Mail) Address. 2. Prepare a separate Part II for each firm that will be part of Provide Information for a representative of the prime contractor the team proposgclIQL&.sp-ecific.contract-and..submitted with-Part-- ------or--joint-venture-that"-the-agency—can-contact for-additional I. If a firm has branch offices,submit a separate,Part Ii for each information. branch office that has a key role on the team. • 1 INDIVIDUAL AGENCY INSTRUCTIONS • Individual agencies may supplement these instructions. For example,they may limit the number of projects or number of pages submitted in Part I in response to.a public announcement for a particular project. Carefully comply with any agency instructions when preparing and submitting this form. Be as concise as possible and provide only the information requested by the agency. AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016)PAGE 1 OF INSTRUCTIONS ' • Prescribed by GSA-FAR(48 CFR)53.236-2(b) • Section C. Proposed Team. 19. Relevant Projects. Provide information on up to five projects in which the person.had a significant role that 9-11. Firm Name,Address,and Role in This Contract demonstrates the person's capability relevant to her/his proposed Provide the contractual relationship,name,full mailing address, role in this contract. These projects do not necessarily have to and a brief description of the role of each firm that will be be any of the projects presented in Section F for the project team involved in performance of this contract. List the prime if the person was not involved in any of those projects or the contractor or Joint venture partners first. if a firm has branch person worked on other projects that were more relevant than offices,indicate each individual branch office that will have a key the team projects in Section F. Use the check box provided to role on the team. The named subcontractors and outside Indicate if the project was performed with any office of the current associates or consultants must be used,and any change must firm. If any of the professional services or construction projects be approved by the contracting officer.(See FAR Part 52 Clause are not complete,leave Year Completed blank and indicate the "Subcontractors and Outside Associates and Consultants status In Brief Description and,Specific Role(block(3)). (Architect-Engineer Services)"). Attach an additional sheet in the same format as Section C if needed. Section F. Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposed Team's Qualifications for this Contract. . Section D. Organizational Chart of Proposed Team. • Select projects where multiple team members worked As an attachment after Section C,present an organizational • together,if possible,that demonstrate the team's capability to • chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all perform work similar to that required for this contract. Complete • key personnel listed in Section E and the firm they are one Section F for each project Present ten projects,unless associated with as listed in Section C. otherwise specified by the agency. Complete the following • blocks for each project: Section E. Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this 20. Example Project Key Number. Start with"1"for the first Contract. project and number consecutively. Complete this section for each key person who will participate in this contract. Group by firm,with personnel of the 21. Title and Location. Title and location of project or prime contractor or joint venture partner firms first. The following contract For an indefinite delivery contract,the location is the blocks must be completed for each resume: geographic scope of the contract. 12. Name. Self-explanatory. 22. Year Completed. Enter the year completed of the professional services(such as planning,engineering study, 13. Role in this contract. Self-explanatory. design,or surveying),and/or the year completed of construction, if applicable. If any of the professional services or the •_ construction projects are not complete,leave Year Completed • 14. Years Experience. Total years of relevant experience blank and indicate the status in Brief Description of Project and • (block 14a),and years of relevant experience with current firm, Relevance to this Contract(block 24). but not necessarily the same branch office(block 14b). 23a. Project Owner. Project owner or user,such as a ' 15. Firm Name and Location. Name,city and state of the • government agency or installation,an institution,a corporation or firm where the person currently works,which must correspond private individual. with one of the firms(or branch office of a firm,if appropriate) I listed in Section C. 23b. Point of Contact Name. Provide name of a person associated with the project owner or the organization which 16. Education. Provide information on the highest relevant contracted for the professional services,who is very familiar with academic degree(s)received. Indicate the area(s)of the project and the firm's(or firms')performance. specialization for each degree. ' 23c. Point of Contact Telephone Number. Self-explanatory. 17. Current Professional Registration. Provide information • on current relevant professional registration(s)in a State or' 24. Brief Description of Project and Relevance to this possession of the United States,Puerto Rico,or the District of . Columbia according to FAR Part 36. Contract. Indicate scope,size,cost,principal elements and • . special features of the project. Discuss the relevance of the example project to this contract. Enter any other information 18. Other Professional Qualifications. Provide information requested by the agency for each example project on any other professional qualifications relating to this contract, such as education,professional registration,publications, organizational memberships, certifications,training, awards,and foreign language capabilities. STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 2 OF INSTRUCTIONS r-- 25. -25. Firms from Section C Involved with this Project. Indicate 29. Example Projects Key. List the key numbers and titles of Which firms(or branch offices,if appropriate)on the project team the example projects in the same order as they appear In Section were involved in the example project,and their roles. List in the F. - same order as Section C. Section H. Additional Information. Section G. Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects. 30. Use this section to provide additional information This matrix is intended to graphically depict which key specifically requested by the agency or to address selection personnel identified in Section E worked on the example projects criteria that are not covered by the information provided in listed in Section.F. Complete the following blocks(see example Sections A-G. below). Section I. Authorized Representative. •• 26,and 27. Names of Key Personnel and Role in this Contract. List the names of the key personnel and their 31.and 32. Signature of Authorized Representative and proposed roles in this contract in the same order as they appear Date. An authorized representative of a joint venture or the in Section E. prime contractor must sign and date the completed form. Signing attests that the Information provided is current and 28. Example Projects Listed in Section F. In the column factual,and that all firms on the proposed team agree to work on under each project key number(see block 29)and for each key the project. Joint ventures selected for negotiations must make person,place an"X"under the project key number for available a statement of participation by a principal of each participation in the same or similar role. member of the joint venture. 33. Name and Title. Self-explanatory. • - i SAMPLE ENTRIES FOR SECTION G (MATRIX) 26. NAMES OF KEY 27, ROLE IN THIS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F PERSONNEL CONTRACT (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below first,before (From Section E, (From Section E, completing table. Place'X"under project key number for Block 12) Block 13) ' participation in same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 • Jane A. Smith Chief Architect X X • Joseph B. Williams Chief Mechanical Engineer X X X X ■ • Tara C. Donovan Chief Electricial Engineer X X X . I 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) 1 Federal Courthouse, Denver, CO 6 XYZ Corporation Headquarters, Boston, MA 2 Justin J. Wilson Federal Building, 7 Founder's Museum, Newport, RI Baton Rouge, LA STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 3 OF INSTRUCTIONS Part II•General Qualifications See the"General Instructions"on page 1 for firms with branch 9. Employees by Discipline. Use the relevant disciplines and , Offices. Prepare Part II for the specific branch office seeking associated function codes shown at the end of these instructions work if the firm has branch offices. and list in the same numerical order. After the listed disciplines, write In any additional disciplines and leave the function code 1. Solicitation Number. If Part II is submitted fora specific blank. List no more than 20 disciplines. Group remaining contract,insert the agency's solicitation number and/or project employees under"Other Employees"In column b, Each person • number,if applicable,exactly as shown in the public can be counted only once according to his/her primary function. announcement or agency request. If Part II is prepared for a firm(including all branch offices),enter the number of employees by disciplines in column c(1). If Part II 2a-2e. Firm(or Branch Office)Name and Address. Self- is prepared for a branch office,enter the number of employees explanatory. by discipline in column c(2)and for the firm in column c(1). I • 3. Year Established. Enter the year the firm(or branch 10. Profile of Firm's Experience and Annual Average office,If appropriate)was established under the current name. Revenue for Last 5 Years. Complete this block for the firm or • branch office for which this Part II is prepared. Enter the • • 4. Unique Entity Identifier. Insert the unique entity Identifier experience categories which most accurately reflect the firm's issued by the entity designated at SAM. See FAR part 4.6. technical capabilities and project experience. Use the relevant experience categories and associated profile codes shown at the 5. Ownership. end of these instructions,and list in thg same numerical order. After the listed experience categories,write in any unlisted a,Type. Enter the type of ownership or legal structure of the relevant project experience categories and leave the profile firm(sole proprietor,partnership,corporation,joint venture,etc.). . codes blank. For each type of experience,enter the appropriate revenue index number to reflect the professional services b.Small Business Status. Refer to the North American revenues received annually(averaged over the last 5 years)by Industry Classification System(NAICS)code iti the public the firm or branch office for performing that type of work. A announcement, and indicate if the firm is a small business particular project may be identified with one experience category according to the current size standard for that NAICS code(for or it may be broken into components,as best reflects the example,Engineering Services(part of NAiCS 541330), capabilities and types of work performed by the firm. However, Architectural Services(NAICS 541310),Surveying and Mapping do not double count the revenues received on a particular Services(NAICS 541370)). The small business categories and project. the.internetwebsite for the NAICS codes appear in FAR part 19. Contact the requesting agency for any questions. Contact your 11. Annual Average Professional Services Revenues of Firm . local U.S.Small Business Administration office for any questions for Last 3 Years. Complete this block for the firm or branch office regarding Business.status. for which this Part(1 is prepared, Enter the appropriate.revenue index numbers to reflect the professional services revenues 6a-6c. Point of Contact. Provide this information for a received annually(averaged over the last 3 years)by the firm or representative of the firm that the agency can contact for branch office. Indicate Federal work(performed directly for the additional Information. The representative must be empowered Federal Government,either as the prime contractor or ,non-Federal work(all other domestic and foreign subcontractor to speak on contractual and policy matters. ) work,including Federally-assisted projects),and the total. If the 7. Name of Firm. Enter the name of the firm if Part II is firm has been in existence for less than 3 years,see the prepared for a branch office. definition for"Annual Receipts"under FAR 19.101. 8a-8c. Former Firm Names. Indicate any other previous 12. Authorized Representative. An authorized names for the firm(or branch office)during the last six years. representative of the firm or branch office must sign and date the Insert the year that this corporate name change was effective completed form. Signing attests that the information provided is and the associated unique entity identifier. This information is current and factual. Provide the name and title of the authorized used to review past performance on Federal contracts. representative who signed the form.• STANDARD FORM 330(REV.812016) PAGE 4 OF INSTRUCTIONS • • • List of Disciplines (Function.Codes) Code • Description Code Description 01 Acoustical Engineer 32 Hydraulic Engineer 02 Administrative 33 Hydrographic Surveyor• 03 . Aerial Photographer 34 Hydrologist 04 Aeronautical Engineer 35 Industrial Engineer • 05 Archeologist 36 Industrial Hygienist 06 Architect 37 Interior Designer • 07 Biologist • 38 Land Surveyor • 08 CADD Technician 39 Landscape Architect - 09 Cartographer 40 Materials Engineer 10 Chemical Engineer 41 Materiais•Handling Engineer 11 Chemist 42 Mechanical Engineer • 12 CMI Engineer 43 Mining Engineer I 13 Communications Engineer 44 Oceanographer • 14 Computer Programmer 45 Photo Interpreter • 15 Construction Inspector 46 Photogrammetrist 16 Construction Manager 47 Planner: Urban/Reglonal l 17 Corrosion Engineer 48 Project Manager 18 Cost Engineer/Estimator 49 Remote Sensing Specialist )I 19 Ecologist 50 Risk Assessor I 20 Economist 51 - Safety/Occupational Health Engineer 21 Electrical Engineer 52 Sanitary Engineer 22 Electronics Engineer 53 Scheduler ' 23 Environmental Engineer 54 Security Specialist ,• 24 • Environmental Scientist 55 Soils Engineer 25 Fire Protection Engineer 56 Specifications Writer i 26 ' Forensic Engineer 57 Structural Engineer ' 27 Foundation/Geotechnical Engineer 58 Technician/Analyst ' 28 Geodetic Surveyor 59 Toxicologist • 29 Geographic Information System Specialist 60 Transportation Engineer • 30 Geologist ' 61 Value Engineer 31 Health Facility Planner 62 Water Resources Engineer i • i . i 1 . 1 1 • 1 • • STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) • PAGE 5 OF INSTRUCTIONS • . List of Experience Categories (Profile Codes) Code Description Code Description A01 Acoustics,Noise Abatement E01 Ecological&Archeological Investigations A02 Aerial Photography;Airborne Data and Imagery E02 Educational Facilities;Classrooms Collection and Analysis E03 Electrical Studies and Design A03 Agricultural Development;Grain Storage;Farm Mechanization E04 Electronics . A04 Air Pollution Control E05 Elevators;Escalators;People-Movers E06 Embassies and Chanceries A05 Airports; Navaids;Airport Lighting;Aircraft Fueling E07 Energy Conservation;New Energy Sources A06 Airports;Terminals and Hangars; Freight Handling E08 Engineering Economics A0Arctic Facilities E09 Environmental Impact Studies, A088 Animal Facilities Assessments or Statements • A09 Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection • E10 Environmental and Natural Resource Al0 Asbestos Abatement Mapping All Auditoriums&Theaters Ell Environmental Planning Al2 Automation;Controls; Instrumentation E12 Environmental Remediation • El3 Environmental..Testing and Analysis • B01 Barracks;Dormitories B02 - Bridges ` • F01 Fallout Shelters;Blast-Resistant Design F02 Field Houses;Gyms;Stadiums CO1 Cartography . F03 Fire Protection F04 Fisheries;Fish ladders i CO2 Cemeteries(Planning&Relocation) F05 Forensic Engineering CO3 Charting: Nautical and Aeronautical FO6 Forestry&Forest products C04 Chemical Processing&Storage C05 Child Care/Development Facilities GO1 Garages;Vehicle Maintenance Facilities; C06 Churches;Chapels • Parking Decks C07 Coastal Engineering G02 Gas Systems(Propane;Natural,Etc.) C08 Codes;Standards;Ordinances G03 Geodetic Surveying:Ground and Air-borne CO9 Cold Storage; Refrigeration and Fast Freeze G04 Geographic Information System Services: • • • C 1 0 Commercial Building(low rise);Shopping Centers Development,Analysis,and Data Collection • C11 Community FacilitiesG05 Geospatial Data Conversion:Scanning, C12 Communications Systems;TV;Microwave Digitizing,Compilation,Attributing,Scribing, • C13 Computer Facilities;Computer Service Drafting C14 Conservation and Resource Management G06 Graphic Design C15 ponstruction Management H01 Harbors;Jetties;Piers,Ship Terminal C16 Construction Surveying Facilities • C17 Corrosion Control;Cathodic Protection;Electrolysis H02 Hazardous Materials Handling and Storage , C18 Cost Estimating;Cost Engineering and H03 Hazardous,Toxic,Radioactive Waste Analysis;Parametric Costing;Forecasting Remediation ; C19 Cryogenic Facilities • H04 Heating;Ventilating;Air Conditioning H05 Health Systems Planning • j D01 Dams(Concrete;Arch) H06 Highrise;Air-Rights-Type Buildings D02 Dams(Earth;Rock);Dikes; Levees H07 Highways;Streets;Airfield Paving; Parking r Lots • D03 Desalinization(Process&Facilities) HOB Historical Preservation • D04 Design-Build-Preparation of Requests for Proposals H09 Hospital&Medical Facilities DO5 Digital Elevation and Terrain Model Development H10 Hotels;Motels' D06 Digital Orthophotography 1111 Housing (Residential, Multi-Family,' D07 Dining Halls;Clubs; Restaurants Apartments;Condominiums) DO8 Dredging Studies and Design H12 Hydraulics&Pneumatics H13 Hydrographic Surveying STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 6 OF INSTRUCTIONS • List of Experience Categories (Profile Codes continued) Code Description Code Description 101 Industrial Buildings;Manufacturing Plants P09 Product,Machine Equipment Design 102 Industrial Processes;Quality Control P10 Pneumatic Structures,Air-Support Buildings 103 Industrial Waste Treatment P11 Postal Facilities 104 Intelligent Transportation Systems P12 Power Generation,Transmission,Distribution 105 Interior Design;Space Planning P13 Public Safety Facilities 106 Irrigation;Drainage RO1 Radar;Sonar;Radio&Radar Telescopes J01 Judicial and Courtroom Facilities R02 Radio Frequency Systems&Shieldings L01 Laboratories;Medical Research Facilities R03 Railroad;Rapid Transit LO2 Land Surveying R04 Recreation Facilities(Parks,Marinas,Etc.) L03 Landscape Architecture R05 Refrigeration Plants/Systems L04 Libraries;Museums; Galleries R06 Rehabilitation(Buildings;Structures;Facilities) L05 Lighting(Interior;Display;Theater, Etc.) R07 Remote Sensing LO6 Lighting(Exteriors;Streets; Memorials; R08 Research Facilities Athletic Fields, Etc.) R09 Resources Recovery;Recycling MO1 Mapping Location/Addressing Systems R10 Risk Analysis M02 Materials Handling Systems; Conveyors;Sorters R11 Rivers;Canals;Waterways;Flood Control • M03 Metallurgy R12 Roofing M04 Microclimatology;Tropical Engineering S01 StudiesatEngineering;Accident Studies;OSHA M05 Military Design Standards • M06 Mining&Mineralogy SO2 Security Systems;Intruder&Smoke Detection • M07 Missile Facilities(Silos;Fuels;Transport) S03 Seismic Designs&Studies . MO8 Modular Systems Design;Pre-Fabricated Structures or SO4 Sewage Collection,Treatment and Disposal Components S05 Soils&Geologic Studies;Foundations S06 Solar Energy Utilization NO1 .Naval Architecture;Off-Shore Platforms S07 Solid Wastes;Incineration;Landfill NO2 Navigation Structures;Locks ' SO8 Special Environments;Clean Rooms,Etc. • NO3 Nuclear Facilities;Nuclear Shielding SO9 Structural Design;Special Structures 001 Office Buildings;Industrial Parks S10 Surveying;Platting;Mapping;Flood 002 Oceanographic Engineering • Plain Studies 003 Ordnance; Munitions;Special Weapons _ S11 Sustainable Design S12 Swimming Pools P01 Petroleum Exploration;Refining. S13. Storm Water Handling&Facilities P02 Petroleum and Fuel(Storage and Distribution) T01 Telephone Systems(Rural;Mobile;intercom, P03 Photogrammetry Etc.) PO4 Pipelines(Cross-Country-Liquid&Gas) T02 Testing&Inspection Services P05 Planning(Community, Regional,Areawide and State) T03 Traffic&Transportation Engineering P06 Planning(Site, Installation,and Project) T04 Topographic Surveying and Mapping T05 Towers(Self-Supporting&Guyed Systems) P07 Plumbing&Piping Design T06 Tunnels&Subways P08 Prisons&Correctional Facilities • STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) PAGE 7 OF INSTRUCTIONS • List of Experience Categories (Profile Codes continued) Code, Description • U01 Unexploded Ordnance Remediation • UO2 Urban Renewals;Community Development UO3 Utilities(Gas and Steam) V01 Value Analysis; Life-Cycle Costing W01 Warehouses.&Depots W02 Water Resources;Hydrology; Ground Water W03 Water Supply;Treatment and Distribution W04 Wind Tunnels; Research/Testing Facilities Design Z01 Zoning; Land Use Studies • • i • I� • STANDARD FORM 330(REV.812016) PAGE 8 OF INSTRUCTIONS • I ARCHITECT - ENGINEER-QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS • A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 2. PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3. SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4. NAME AND TITLE • 5. NAME OF FIRM • 5, TELEPHONE NUMBER 7. FAX NUMBER 8. E-MAIL ADDRESS C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) LLI 'F m° 9. FIRM NAME 10. ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT re 0- a.co 1— - i a. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE • C. CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE • d. El CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE e. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE f. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE ' D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑ (Attached) AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016) I • 1 . E E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT - (Complete one Section E for each key person.) •• 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE • a.TOTAL fib.WITH CURRENT FIRM • 15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) • i 1 16. EDUCATION(Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(State and Discipline) I 18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) 19. RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm • • a. i j (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION Of applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE 0 Check if project performed with current firm • b (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC . . • Check if project performed with current firm C • (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) j I d_(3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm i • . t (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) i a (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ri Check if project performed with current firm 1 O. 1 • 1 STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016).PAGE 2 • I F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) 21. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED . PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) • 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope,size,and cost) • • • • • • { 25, FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE . a. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE b. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE • • C. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE d. (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE e. • (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE • f. STANDARD FORM 330(REV•8/2016)PAGE 3 • G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26. NAMES OF KEY 27. ROLE IN THIS 28. EXAMPLE PROJECTS LISTED IN SECTION F PERSONNEL CONTRACT (Fill in uExample Projects Key"section below before completing table. Place'7C"under project key number for particlpatlon in same or similar role.) (From Section E,Block 12) (From Section E,Block 13) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 r • • • .1 i i • i i i 1 1 • i I • • r I • ' • i . I iI I 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY i NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) NUMBER TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(From Section F) 1 6 i 2 • • 7 j 3 8 ! • • 4 9 5 10 • STANDARD FORM 330(REV. 812016)PAGE 4 I • f H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. • • • • • I. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE J The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31. SIGNATURE 32. DATE 33. NAME AND TITLE • STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016)PAGE 5 • 1. SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) • ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART H-GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work.) 2a. FIRM(or Branch Office)NAME 3.YEAR ESTABLISHED 4. UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER 2b. STREET 5. OWNERSHIP a.TYPE 2c, CITY 2d. STATE 12e. ZIP CODE b.SMALL BUSINESS STATUS 6a. POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE 7. NAME OF FIRM(If Block 2a Is a Branch Office) 6b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 6c. E-MAIL ADDRESS • 8a. FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(If any) '8b. YEAR ESTABLISHED 8c. UNIQUE ENTITY IDENTIFIER J� 10, PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE 9. EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS • • c.Number of Employees a.Profile c.Revenue Index a.Function b.Discipline b.Experience Number Code (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH Code (see below) • • • • • • i • • Other Employees Total 11. ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (Insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million b.Non-Federal Work 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater c.Total Work 12. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE• The foregoing is a statement of facts. a.SIGNATURE b.DATE c.NAME AND TITLE • STANDARD FORM 330(REV.8/2016)PAGE 6 ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 36 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 1 of 3 Florida Department of State DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS I 4`/d;sot`t gf A .org 0.r,?_ J1\i!r 1.O1`13 wt uj�r:isj tate of'r!r'?iJo website Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number/ Detail by FEI/EIN Number Florida Profit Corporation CURTIS&ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC. Filing Information Document Number S89127 FEI/EIN Number 65-0294753 Date Filed 10/23/1991 State FL • Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 10/05/1992 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 7520 S. Red Road Suite M South Miami, FL 33143 Changed:07/09/2013 Mailing Address 7520 S. Red Road • Suite M South Miami, FL 33143 Changed:07/09/2013 Registered Agent Name&Address CURTIS, ROBERT 7901 SW 58 AVENUE MIAMI, FL 33143 Address Changed: 01/13/2003 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title D Curtis,Aida M. http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/Corporations earch/S earchResultDetail?inq... 12/21/2018 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 2 of 3 7520 S. Red Road Suite M South Miami, FL 33143 Title VP Lee,Jean C 7520 S. Red Road Suite M South Miami, FL 33143 - - — Title-ExecutiveSecretary -- - - --- -- - Rogers-Pomaville,Jennifer Joan 7520 S. Red Road Suite M South Miami, FL 33143 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2016 01/04/2016 2017 01/18/2017 2018 01/17/2018 Document Images 01/17/2018—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/18/2017—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/04/2016—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/06/2015—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/06/2014 ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/09/2013—AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2013—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/04/2012—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/04/2011—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2010—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2009—ANNUAL REPORT View image in,PDF format 01/11/2008—ANNUAL REPORT I View image in PDF format 01/08/2007—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/18/2006—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/24/2005;ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/09/2004—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2003—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/15/2002—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/09/2001—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2000—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/1999—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/27/1998—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/24/1997—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/18/1996—ANNUAL REPORT View Image in PDF format http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inq... 12/21/2018 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 3 of 3 03/27/1995—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Florida Department of State,Division of Corporations • http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationS earch/S earchResultDetail?inq... 12/21/2018 SUBMITTAL FOR: City of Miami Beach 1RFQ 2018-141-ND Miami Beach 1 Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Renewal and Replacement Projects � � • ' l=.• j • i, 'J' !i :1,.ta >: , � �, ii moi!1;4 1 y� ��' �5� HW f� �r� s te, _ J�1�� • a / � w1 ,4.-4....-0-..,:- I G v. '^moi / � ' N t , a .a Vii,. y' r i1, • � t 'r r'\ iii �. t. 7 OK ``• AN eft/ .e,„ , i.,...;.:..k. w 0 . • i L �r ti 7 r y '�� 'ilii, A4,..'i. y, •p.,-- _ _'rr :t.t.i1 ' J. _._ k r1.1 Is e. tue Notre DartStreifigt. • • 1 •'1 , ,ice ` • Elm. . i.,�..w - Iri kr. , �' , • N ..., al N• • i -!'..t.'' �. l, t • Arr i 1. _ __-6_. l •It � A-.A7/ Samso Sunny t ;' • SUBMITTED BY: May 7, 2018 CURTIS + ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO • [ table of contents ] Tab 1- Cover Letter&Table of Content 1.1 Cover Letter 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire& Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) Tab 2- Minimum Requirements 2.1 Minimum Qualifications Requirements Tab 3- Experience & Qualification of the Firm 3.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm • Tab 4- Experience & Qualifications of the Team 4.1 Qualifications of Proposed Team 4.1.1 Project Experience Tab 5-.Required Forms 5.1 Standard Form 330 • • • [ Tab 1 ] Cover Letter&Table of Content 1.1 Cover Letter 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) CURTIS + ROGERS (' DESIGN STUDIO, INC Al May 7, 2018 Ms. Natalia Delgado City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue—3rd Floor Miami Beach, FL 33139 CURTIS Re: Request for Qualifications- Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Renewal and Replacement Projects—ARCHITECTURE-LANDSCAPE RFQ No. 2018-141-ND ROGERS Dear Ms. Delgado: DESIGN STUDIO Curtis + Rogers Design Studio, Inc. (C+R) is pleased to submit our credentials to provide LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL services related to the above solicitation. We look forward in I N c. serving and collaborating with the City of Miami Beach, as it moves into the future solving the challenges of urban growth and climate change while ensuring excellent quality of life for its residents. Landscape Experience,Ability,Capacity and Skills Architecture Since Curtis + Rogers inception, more than 26 years ago, the firm has dedicated its practice to working with municipalities in public projects. Curtis + Rogers has collaborated with the City of Miami, City of Coral Gables, City of South Miami, City of Hialeah, Miami-Dade County, Miami- Dade Schools, FDOT and numerous other local entities, in small miscellaneous projects and studies. C+R has 6 registered landscape architects on staff, 3 certified landscape inspectors, 3 certified arborists and 3 LEED accredited professionals. Character, Integrity,Reputation,Judgement, Experience and Efficiency Curtis + Rogers has been in business for over 26 years. Its principals have over 100 years of combined experience, primarily serving public clients. Every project the firm undertakes, has the 7 5 2 0 C+R principals, vested in client service and performance. This commitment to client service and S. RED excellence in design lead to their firm being honored as landscape Architects of the Year" in 2001 and in 2009 by the Miami Chapter of the AIA. The firm has never been involved in R 0 A D litigation. Our history of repeat clients, is a testament to our integrity and service. SUITE M Quality of Performance SOUTH Curtis + Rogers is known for developing innovative, environmentally sound projects. Our firm's MI AMI most recent award winning projects—FOOT Naturalized Roadways, and Hialeah's Garden of the Arts are few examples of the depth in creativity and sustainability exhibited by CR's projects. FLORIDA 3 3 1 4 3 We look forward to discussing further our credentials, experience and methodology in servicing Miami Beach in this project. TELEPHONE 305-442-1774 Sincerely, FACSIMILE (11:e4 a JA al....„. .}.... 305-445-9488 Aida M. Curtis LLC. LC 000241 President Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS 6:41. RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC Solicitation No: Solicitation Titles RFQ 2018-141-ND PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS Procurement Contact Tel: 1..Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305.673.7000,Ext.6263 NATALIADELGADO(WIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE& REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Curtis+ Rogers Design Studio,Inc. NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS:27 years —I NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: 27 years 11 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 7520 S. Red Road,Suite M CITY: South Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE. 33143 TELEPHONE NO.: 305 442 1774 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAX NO.: 305 445 9488 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: same as above CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Aida M.Curtis ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305 442 1774 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: aida@curtisrogers.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 65-0294753 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 2018-141-ND 18 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141 ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC (2b# 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro ser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance,—b�a-n�public sector agency? YES I XINO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions,as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code')and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at http://www.miamibeachfl.aov/city-halVorocurementi RFQ 2018-141–ND 19 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS leo RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 7. • . benefits . .. •. . •.. •.. ... . .. _ • . benefits- SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the"other'section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X _ If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation. Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at http://www.miamibeachfi.Qov/city-hall/procurement/procurement-related-ordinance-and- procedures! RFQ 2018-141—ND 20 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement.Pursuant to Section 2-376 of the City Code,the City shall not enter into any contract resulting from a competitive solicitation, unless the proposer certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in Article V of Chapter 62 of the City Code ("Fair Chance Ordinance"), and which, among other things, (i) prohibits City contractors, as an employer, from inquiring about an applicant's criminal history until the applicant is given a conditional offer of employment; (ii) prohibits advertising of employment positions with a statement that an individual with a criminal record may not apply for the position, and(iii)prohibits placing a statement on an employment application that a person with a criminal record may not apply for the position. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required at this time. By virtue of executing this affidavit, Proposer certifies that it has adopted policies,practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance. Proposer agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request. Proposer further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract, and shall entitle the City to the immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition to any damages that may be available at law and in equity. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt AC Addendum 1 AC'. Addendum 6 Addendum 11 AC Addendum 2 AC Addendum 7 Addendum 12 AC Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 AC Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 AC Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. RFQ 2018-141—ND 21 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC (-111 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION • The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the'City')for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation, or in making any award, or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviates from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete. The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipients own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made. Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications,and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQ 2018-141—ND Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC (;.,fr. PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Rep Aida M. Curtis President Signature of 's Authorized Rep4resentat.4 tive: 7\ Date: 04/16/2018 State of FLORIDA ) On this 16th day of April ,2018,personally ) appeared before me Aida M.Curtis who County of Miami Dade ) stated that (s)he is the President of Curtis+Rogers Design , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and d• . B:fore me: t r otary Public for e S •to of Florida y Commission Expires: 03/24/2019 . Noy Pubic stets a Flortds Barbara Diaz j My Commission FF 213353 �/ Expires 03/2412019 RFQ 2018-141-ND Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS 64 RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC Tab 2 Minimum Requirements 2.1 Minimum Qualifications Requirements CURTIS + ROGERS ( DESIGN STUDIO, INC ;�! Curtis+ Rogers Design Studio,Inc. State of Florida-Corporate Landscape License State of Florida-Corporate Certificate STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LICENSE NUMBER y r11 LCC000241 . . frc5". The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BUSINESS " , Named below HAS REGISTERED Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date. NOV 30,2019 0 •;i1L ❑ CURTIS&ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO �. °. " '"* �,,,, 7520 S RED ROAD STEM - , SOUTH MIAMI FL 33143 ` ISSUED: 11/0112017 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEQ# L1711010005848 State of Florida Department of State [certify from the records of this office that CURTIS&ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO,INC.is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on October 23,1991. The document number of this corporation is 589127. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2018,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 17,2018,and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed Articles of Dissolution. Given ander my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee,the Capital.this the Seventeenth day of Janaorv. 3018 •' `7 Secretary of State Tratdq d..h.r.CC19)11►2f7117 T.a.dnneh utt erilliedembit ar Ulm*Ammar this agar,r Os /Am u.rtmames eipl p& Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS (;•#,. REQ 2018 lal-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC Curtis + Rogers Design Studio, Inc. State of Florida- Landscape Architect License RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR JONATHAN ZACHEM,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION .. BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ,� .. •• L 'r ~ LICENSE NUMBER ♦ AO fV_ LA0001330 '• - The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Named below HAS REGISTERED _ -.%.,..i ,,�,,,.d; -_'�'� �"'y -�-.'�� s • j _ Under the date:provisions of Chapter 481 FS. .. • .� �* Expiration date: NOV 30,2019 �- ` "^�� -.• moi _ CURTIS,ADA MARIA r"f ori '''1[• 7901 SW 58 AVE .,..`•- MIAMI FL 33143 `" nt: 1.-: 'rJ. '`yl ISSUED: 12/05/2017 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEO0 L1712050001415 RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR JONATHAN ZACHEM,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE w `1t"r irk ...ie.._ _ LA6667093 - `,t 1 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT `�� Named below HAS REGISTERED 42;- .i � Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. - - --.„'s,\„,,,---.........,„:.1. ,d,y`..,"�,,-` Expiration date: NOV 30,2019 Zrk'.." b ".2-....••••:-..;‘,..-., ` " 7.---__.;.•--77- / -- _ tis 1. .`---- „ , -.. . 0 ..•-..5:10 /�/ ROGERS-POMAVILLE,JENNIFER JOAN 411e r, . ✓/ ' 345 CADIMA AVE • �� -`tir '*�* • — -- CORAL GABLES FL 33134 " _'iJ �+f... ISSUED: 1111512017 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEG a L1 7 111 5000107 7 04,.� STATE OF FLORIDA .-..r DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND V' PROFESSIONAL REGULATION LA6667246 ISSUED: 10/15/2017 REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ' BOLDU DALLMANN,MARIANA GABRIELA HAS REGISTERED under the provisions of Ch 481 FS Expiaeon Osla NOV 30 2019 L1710150003445 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS (2.0, RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC Curtis+Rogers Design Studio, Inc. State of Florida- Licenses RICK SCOTT.GOVERNOR JONATHAN ZACHEM,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION �.'�` BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ; ' ; ; LICENSE NUMBER ,.f/ LA0001721 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - - Named below HAS REGISTERED � Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. '�—= * �'"'"1'-' �, �, `� IIIIIr Expiration date: NOV 30 2019 -L:MIN. -r .. `�, �., CICII�� LEE, JEAN C r 30 NW 100 TERRACE �..„ ``-7",--- 1� "r• MIAMI SHORES FL 33150 - - °• - �. - `- "-• tf %` e AY \ � sk.e M ISSUED: 11/19/2017 DISPLAS REQUIRED BY LAW SEC)*SEC)* L1711190001988 1,`�~��ll RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR JONATHAN ZACHEM.SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA - `1 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE -< r LICENSE NUMBER '%." . , Y-.1.1/. LA0000815 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT _ ~` Named below HAS REGISTERED , '''`r, •' ~ Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. ,,-.,a SII ."�. N. Expiration date: NOV 30,2019e ., '"•.. 7 MARSTON,GERALD CARTER ' �.., "�. C❑, a \ 7520 S.RED ROAD ... �. a f rtie \ r� SUITE M '�_ ' - .r' CURTIS+ ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO INC. `�`�t. WS w. 1,� �. `k. st\ SOUTH MIAMI FL 33'43 t ❑ J..8 ••■o• \t cif, % 11141' .i..--,-',..+-).\31` ISSUED 11/08/2017 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEC)* L1711080001931 RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR JONATHAN ZACHEM,SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION _,. i, BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE °rs LICENSE NUMBERLA6667366 The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Named below HAS REGISTERED Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS Expiration date NOV 30,2019 CI ID FERRER,RAFAEL JUAN •tI..- .' . . 3248 NE 11 DRIVE '. 1 HOMESTEAD FL 33033 •,Zk• '-' '`� ISSUED 12/19/2017 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEG II L1712190000596 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 4 Aida M.Curtis Certifications r i INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE CERTIFIED ARBORIST`'' Aida Maria Curtis Having successfully completed the requirements set by the Arborist Certification Board of the International Society of Arboriculture, the above named is hereby recognized as an ISA Certified A y ist" I, p Jim slum.Executive Director ''tInternational Society of Arboriminuz 51440; .ef.a J International Society ocrii ele,oou(.Arboriculture FL-6793A Nov 07,2015 Dec 71,201E 0111:1 Gm(ahn Nuhn Grdd Since Evocation Dar ',`• —,�1{? Va...,ii_E"a+ x3�-.ii -:i..5- AA-.a. " • is ` iNTA oi.A®n tWP a' � 5} 4.,,:, Cart IfJostles at.2011-0162 yt .' •: aplrttia CrUM� i cGre 11. 2011 '.' ,�3. .ea, n` r� 1: This certifies that , - , Aida .Wt. Curti s „ .4" .4 5 SE'S Having shown to possess the necessary qualificationsl F and having complied with the requirements of the , LO ,jp- Landscape Inspectors Association of Florida,L.A.A. '',1 was by an order of this body recognized as competent A :V „,* in dispensing of the duties of a '� ~' Landscape Inspector ' ' Q `` S i 0' .6 . Given under the seal of the 1 s °I, #t landscape Inspectors Association of Florida LAA. ni' this i day of March,2016 4ts .. --`•.. .%. e--`7---- Certification Chair ryw l Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2o18-141-No DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 Jennifer Rogers-Pomaville Certifications International 7j Society - of Arboriculture" / ISA Certified Arborist ISA Jennifer Joan Rogers-Pomaville Certification Number: FL-6795A Expiration Date: Dec 31, 2018 JJJ JJJ J'J❑ J JJ GBCI GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION INSTITUTE Jennifer Rogers-Pomaville ana Arrinvra TitE btIMMArIh«rn LEED. ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL XiVUI►tD SUY YUCCt38EUL lAULSAISN TATUM U1 TNt FADAS NtE to(MAXUS AZ:.FV YtIDJU NTAL BMW,.IF FC.i•:AF➢•;%WI DI^:c/S I.'ICI WWI _ 121/N — Marh9.,009 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC N Curtis+ Rogers Design Studio, Inc. LEED Certificate `'0uun,,40 u. nc n 1110 GSGBG U.S. Green Building Council Curtis + RogersDesign g n Studio MEMBER SINCE 2007 THE U.S. GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL IS THE NATION'S FOREMOST COALITION OF LEADERS WORKING TO TRANSFORM THE WAY BUILDINGS AND COMMUNITIES ARE DESIGNED, BUILT AND OPERATED,ENABLING AN ENVIRONMENTALLY AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE, HEALTHY,AND PROSPEROUS ENVIRONMENT THAT IMPROVES THE QUALITY OF LIFE. :2141166-44— /7/efrgit--- Chatrmart SRichardFed[iz i,P President,CE0and Founding Chairman TriV.. " ele Ailie Vie*lift Viet'IC Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC Tab 3 Experience & Qualification of the Firm 3 3.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm • • • CURTIS + ROGERS (" DESIGN STUDIO, INC01,7 Curtis + Rogers Design Studio, Inc Firm Profile Curtis+Rogers Design Studio was formed with the purpose of providing quality Landscape Architecture / Planning Services.The firm, founded in 1991 by Aida M.Curtis and Ik Richard Rogers,and joined by Jean C.Lee in 2004;Jennifer , Rogers in 2005;Gerald Marston in 2010 and Mariana Boldu . . "It-. ( w. in 2017 as Director of Innovation and Resilience Design � - 2� - represents over 150 years of Landscape Architectural '�; � - , experience. Commitment to producing quality projects ''�-= - J '4'. ' .M and providing client satisfaction forms the foundation of our fine reputation. Baytront Park, Miami,Florida We design environments using a process that emphasizes Design Process creativity and innovation within the context of rational problem-solving.Cultural,economic,environmental,social We believe that creativity and innovation results from an forces and current climate change dynamics are strong interaction between motivated clients and professionals. determinants of design. The best designs result from an interactive process between artistic creativity,knowldge and experienced Design C011aboratior judgment. Our practice is founded on a collaborative approach which stresses interaction between clients, fellow design Technical Capabilities professionals and Curtis+Rogers. We are committed in utilizing state of the art technology enabling us to serve our client and project needs efficiently Design Expression and accurately. The Principals' and Directors' personal familiarity with all programs allows for their direct Our inspiration for design expression grows from an interaction trhoughout all stages in projects. appreciation for context,and an understanding of program. Context includes the understanding of the influences of a physical setting, the history and culture of an area, and from particular opportunities and constraints that grow Built Projects from the program. Our expression is a direct result of trying to maximize the social benefits and at the same time Curtis + Rogers has, and is, continuing to influence the minimizing the imposition of the man-made environment South Florida landscape and skyline through such projects on the natural setting. We care deeply about building as: Miami Dade Children's Courthouse, American Airlines quality projects that last and serve those who entrust us to Arena, Zoo Miami, Parrot Jungle and Gardens at Watson provide these services. Island, the Wilkie Ferguson US Federal Courthouse, Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan, Miami Children's ,;R k, .•,-. t. ;0 - '� ', " i Museum, and countless parks such as Camp Matecumbe, y j%' /` 4. V Deering Estate, Doral Park, Gibson Park, Moore Park, Aitt` rpt" �i � • R-. •. . , t �. ,�}� Bayfront Park and schools throughout the tri county /' it, area. Projects throughout the State include: Fort Pierce two*' IssO Federal Courthouse, the Broward Children's Museum and �` Reading Center, the Islamorada Administrative Center and Public Safety Headquarters, the St. Petersburg Pier, Atlantic Avenue Beautification in Delray Beach,Boca Raton .4"111‘ 4� Streetscape, the Orlando Centroplex, Gulfstream Office l"""' ". Park in Plantation, Lee County Health Park, Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Disney Contemporary Hotel and Meeting Facility in Orlando, Villages of Homestead, Florida State -- - ' University in Tallahassee, and the University of Central ' Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan, Florida in Orlando. Miami,Florida Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC - 15th Street Improvements Miami, Florida This exciting project transforms an existing street from a simple connector to a raised, City of Miami festive pedestrion friendly plaza.While the street will still serve vehicular traffic during Capital Improvements& most of the week,the addition of removable bollards will allow the City of Miami to Transportation Program close the entore street,allowing only foot traffic during festivities and special events 444 SW 2nd Avenue including Viernes Culturales.This creates an outdoor experience that is unique to Calle Miami,Florida 33130 Ocho and Little Havana.S.W. 15 Avenue also features the use of decorative color pav- Project Address ers that were designed to highlight and emphasize the street.These pavers match the SW 7th&SW 8th look of the section along S.W.15 Avenue to the south in front of Domin park creating a Miami,Florida sense of continuity in design and feel. 33134 Project Dates April 2016-May 2017 Reference Contact •„ _ it Ms.Ivelisse Rodriguez - "• - • Project Manager ;S%; �,;� � -IM City of Miami ;^ t4f �X 444 S.W.2nd Avenue,4th floor "" '-' '' • *i • Miami,FL 33130 mly111 � ' Don Quijote Park Hialeah, Florida Services Don Quijote Plaza is an open public space that features a Don Quijote Sculpture called"Ode to Landscape,Hardscape, Freedom"that represents the people and city of Hialeah. Our design and concept were inspired Furnishing,Irrigation, by the artistic and visual lore of Don Quijote and the setting that embodies the imagery of the Lighting,Structural story. That imagery(from Spain)ironically fits right in to the Hialeah landscape which shares a similar natural landscape of open prairie and a population that is 94%Hispanic.The image of Project Address Don Quijote set amidst an open landscape of windmills,grasses,and open sky further drove that 1900 W.49th Street vision which melded with the form and function of the site. The notion of the iconic windmills Hialeah,FL turning and radiating from a central point guide a place with a central democratic and flowing 33012 open space that draws users in and out from strategic access points that allow for uninterrupted directional access from the surrounding crosswalk,sidewalk,and hotel. The central point,that Project Dates features the sculpture,offers a focal point that allows the park to revolve around it with options 2017/2018 to stroll,sit,or engage the open lawn. At the same,the sculpture is visible from the surrounding roads and walkways allowing the park to become an iconic landmark within the City. Ultimately, Reference Contact the park will provide a rich and unique setting for passersby,locals,and those visiting the City all Vicente Rodriguez, the while embossing the image of the City. Director City of Hialeah Construction and Maintenance Dept. • 900 E.56th Street Hialeah,FL 33013 t g �� z '• `\• { • •.. •�• • Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC (;si# MDC- Parking Garage Plaza Miami, Florida As part of the development of a new parking garage in downtown Miami, C+R was asked to Miami-Dade College design an urban plaza in a remnant portion of the site. The plaza is designed as an urban oasis for Facilities Mgmt students and youth in the surrounding downtown Miami. Nestled between the campus'of Miami Neyda Otero Dade College and the New World School of the Arts,the plaza allows a calm place for students 786 229-2061 to study and relax in a lush green environment in stark contrast to the existing urban environment. The plaza design offers a variety of open spaces for impromptu performances and art exhibits as Project Address well as cozy modern furnishings with places to gather or lay on a lawn. The adjacent white wall 500 NE 2nd Ave, flanking the park is envisioned to be a new mural designed and implemented by the local youth Miami,FL 33130 and a backdrop for the new urban plaza. Project Dates December 2015-June 2018 e1 74. Reference Contact Miami-Dade CollegeO • Facilities Mgmt ` Neyda Otero '`" "-- •- " 786 229-2061 1161. • • • Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC (-°,' [ Tab 4 ] Experience & Qualifications of the Team 4.1 Qualifications of Proposed Team 4.1.1 Project Experience Aida M, Curtis Jennifer Rogers-Pomaville Mariana Boldu Puben Coion ..'ac:ob Lafeve, Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-No DESIGN STUDIO, INC 7 Aida M. Curtis Manactind Principal Ms. Curtis has over 29 years of experience on a variety of p'oject types including park design, urban design and corporate/commercial design. Ms. Curtis'strong management and technical skills have produced many outstanding projects. She has worked on a number of multidisciplinary teams and has been responsible for producing complex bid packages. Registration Ms. Curtis specializes in seeking consensus in complex multi-disciplinary projects. Through effective communication skills, Ms. Curtis navigates through layered issues Registered Landscape by illustrating alternatives and addressing specific concern; with multiple interested Architect in the parties. Her ability to present ideas and analyze multiple solutions has been a key skill State of Florida in achieving overall consensus. Her experience in public projects has provided her with LA 0001330 a depth of knowledge and strategies that can be utilized during Community Input and Public Involvement sessions. Affiliations Member The American Ms. Curtis' commitment to sustainability and improvement in the public realm is the Society of Landscape hallmark of projects developed under her supervision. Her solutions are creative, Architects practical, and cost-effective. She prides herself in giving clients personalized attention and direct involvement in their projects. Her technical abilities, strategic decision- International Society of making, and dynamic understanding of contemporary issues are assets to all projects Arboriculture the firm undertakes. Certified Arborist Park Ex l - American Bankers-Wings of Asia; Metrozoo,Florida Certified Landscape Antonio Maceo Park;Miami,Florida Inspector Florida Camp Matecumbe Park;Miami,Florida Coconut Grove Waterfront Park;Miami,Florida Coral Springs Sportsplex;Coral Springs,Florida ASLA Certificate for Deering Estate at Cutler Master Plan Update; Miami-Dade CourT:y,Florida Excellence in the Study of Deering Estate South Addition; Miami-Dade County,Florida Landscape Architecture Doral Park;Miami,Florida Don Quijote Park,Hialeah,Florida Education FPL Solar Center,Miami-Dade,Florida Zoologico Rosie Walter;Tegucigalpa,Honduras Texas A&M University Garden of Arts;Hialeah,Florida Bachelor of Science in Gibson Park;Miami,Florida Landscape Architecture Goulds Aquatic Facility;Miami,Florida Little Haiti Park; Miami,Florida Employment Lummus Park; Miami Beach,Florida 1991-Present Moore Park;Miami,Florida Curtis+Rogers Design North Shore Open Space Park; Miami Beach,Florida Studio Inc North Shore Park; Miami Beach,Florida NW 12 Avenue,Linear Park;Miami,Florida 1984-1991 Palmetto Mini Golf Course; Miami,Florida Sasaki Associates Parrot Jungle Island;Miami,Florida Samson Park;Sunny Isles,Florida 1983-1984 Henderson Civic Experience American Airlines Arena;Miami,FL Federal Office Building;Miramar,FL Fort Pierce Courthouse; Fort Pierce,Florida Historic Overtown Streetscape-NW 3rd Ave;Miami,Florida Jackson Memorial Hospital South Campus; Miami,Florida Leon Medical Center-Midway Clinic,Flagler Street;Miami,Florida Little Haiti Cultural Center;Miami,Florida Miami Intermodal Center;Miami,FL Miami River Greenway;Miami,Florida Miami World Center Convention Hotel,Miami,Florida Normandy Isle Neighborhood Improvements; Miami Beach,Florida South Pointe Neighborhood Improvements; Miami Beach,Florida Wilke D.Ferguson Jr.U.S.Federal Courthouse,Miami,Florida Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC N 2nd Avenue Streetscape Miami, Florida Curtis&Rogers Design Studio was hired to provide landscape architecture services City of Miami as part of a team of consultants working on the reconstruction of NE 2nd Ave from N Hector Badia 42nd Street to N 51st Street.The project consisted of reworking the street to allow for two travel lanes,a bike trail,and some parking in critical areas.The resulting sidewalks Project Address became 6'-8'wide.Curtis+Rogers worked creatively to add canopy trees within City of Miami NE 2nd Ave. this area known citywide for its deficient canopy.C+R opted in adding smaller trees From N 42nd St.to N 51st St. at closer spacing,spaces containing the trees were to be filled with pervious bound aggregate for increased permeability and tree growth while providing added ADA Project Dates width to the walking areas.While the trees were installed young,given the lack of May 2015-June 2016 availability at the time,we are confident the increased canopy is of great benefit to the community. Reference Contact Hector Badia Assistant Director City of Miami _ . -s r� 444 S.W.2nd Ave,8th Floor " tk 33130 Ki� +c 1, 305 416 1236 ' �. HBadia@miamigov.com — y. it .0 ft`a t if L ri 11 . " e r., a JL. ' K ; »� Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCCL) Innovation Lab Port of Miami, Florida Clier* Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Curtis+Rogers collaborated with Leo A Daly-Architecture for the successful completion of the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.(RCCL) Innovation Lab. This innovative Project Address project which was completed in 2017 was also awarded LEED Silver certification. The 120 Caribbean Way landscape design combines environment and aesthetics by using vegetation that is Miami,FL appropriate to site and place. Plant material was carefully selected to fit in and thrive 33142 in its coastal setting(located at the Port of Miami)while enhancing the materiality rich surrounding architecture. The landscape at the RCCL Innovation Lab provides the Project Dates richness,texture,and presence that only nature can provide,making it a place that is in 2016/2017 harmony with its setting. Reference Contact ,0-1 0 Sergio Pendas Leo A.Daly 5200 Blue Lagoon Dr. Suite 700r ., Miami,Fl 33126 ' 4. ■ 786-257-5955 ) •r r 1 - 4 ' ' ' . 1117'. . ' :%'44.'.A4:,.*:-.1:,... ' 4,,,- * . „,, V ti aa' ,'rill „ , 4• ' - 1 0 AliviK'...... Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 4 St.Thomas Episcopal School & Parish Miami, Florida Client Curtis+ Rogers Design Studio was hired to create a Masterplan for the School/Parish Campus St.Thomas Episcopal School which included the addition of a new ball field (including new perimeter walls),re-configuring and re-surfacing the parking lot area, creating an area for a Student Garden, and creating a Nature Walk to connect the school to the new field. The school was very interested in"green" Project Address initiatives,and C+R utilized its knowledge of green design to aid the client in making decisions St.Thomas Episcopal School that would create a positive example to the students and community for sustainable design. C+R 5692 North Kendall Drive was involved in all aspects of the planning and design,including committee and neighborhood Coral Gables,FL 33156 meetings,creating renderings forfundraising and neighborhood meetings and permitting through the City of Coral Gables. C+R was actively involved in all steps of construction,making sure that Project Dates the final product was of outstanding quality. December 2009/March 201144) it It Phase 1 and 2 — a'tf 1 . Y Reference Contact " — _ Linda Johnson Director of Development -400.111111M-,41111 St.Thomas Episcopal School 5692 North Kendall Drive Coral Gables,FL 33156le 786-268-3496 • Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC (I- 5 Jennifer Rogers, RLA Design Principal / Landscape Architect Ms. Rogers has been with C+R since 2005, and became a partner in 2016. She earned her Master's Degree in Landscape Architecture following a notable career as a nationally certified fine arts teacher of 16 years,and has been managing projects at *' C + R for over 10 years. Ms. Rogers has worked on many projects types such as parks/recreation, transportation, civic, educational, commercial, and residential. Ms. Rogers has also been an adjunct professor at the FIU College of Architecture. Since Registration joining the C + R family, Ms. Rogers has served in all areas of work from design Registered Landscape Architect in to construction administration for multiple high-profile projects. She contributes her the expertise in habitat and urban design as a Registered Landscape Architect, an ISA State of Florida Certified Arborist,and extensive experience with LEED design. LA 6667093 Park Exr?erienC= Camp Matecumbe Park;Miami-Dade,Florida Bayfront Park Capital Improvement Plan;Miami,Florida ISA Certified Arborist Gibson Park;Miami,Florida #FL-6795A MD Palmetto Mini Golf,Miami,Florida Melreese Golf Course Clubhouse and Restaurant;Miami,Florida Affiliations Civic Experience Member-The American Society of Aventura Arts&Cultural Center;Aventura,Florida Landscape Architects Broward County Courthouse;Fort Lauderdale,Florida Broward Children's Reading Center+Museum;Davie Florida International Society of Arboriculture Broward Health Coral Springs Expansion;Coral Springs,FL Certified Arborist City of Homestead Police Facility;Homestead,FL Doral Police Substation;Doral,FL FIU Parking Garages 5&6,Miami,Florida Ft.Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport Terminal 1;Ft.Lauderdale,Florida FLASLA Certificate of Honor Frost School of Music;Coral Gables,Florida GSA-FBI Federal office Building;Miramar,Florida Nationally Certified Art Jackson Memorial Hospital South Expansion;Miami,Florida Teacher;Florida Link @ Douglas Station;Miami,FL Little Haiti Cultural Center;Miami,Florida Education Miami Dade Mental Health Diversion Facility;Miami,FL Pembroke Pines Civic Center;Pembroke Pines,FL Florida International University Pinecrest Community Center Expansion;Pinecrest,FL Master of Landscape Architecture Pompano Beach Library,Pompano Beach,Florida Master of Art Education Seventh Avenue Transit Village;Miami,FL South-Dade Water Reclamation Plant;Miami,Florida Skidmore College Masfout Hospital;Ajman,UAE Bachelor of Science in Studio Art University Baptist Church;Miami,Florida Employment LEED Projects 2005—Present Aventura Arts&Cultural Center;Aventura,Florida Curtis+Rogers Design Broward Children's Reading Center and Museum;Davie,Florida Studio,Inc. Everglades Elementary;West Palm Beach,Florida GSA-FBI Federal office Building;Miramar,Florida 1992-2005 Melreese Golf Course Clubhouse and Restaurant;Miami,Florida Miami-Dade Public Schools Miami-Dade Community College Hialeah;Hialeah,Florida Miami Edison Senior High School South-Dade Water Reclamation Plant;Miami,Florida Art Teacher Stranahan Senior High School;Ft.Lauderdale,Florida Streetscapes +Transportation City of Miami Fiager Streetscape;Miami,Florida Coconut Grove Streetscapes;Miami,Florida Commodore Trail Pedestrian&Bicycle Bridge;Coral Gables,Florida Design District Streetscape;Miami,Florida FDOT-HEFT Widening Killian to Bird;Miami,Florida FDOT-1-595;Broward County,Florida Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard Street Enhancement;Miami,Florida Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC St. Stephen's Episcopal Church Labrinth Coconut Grove, Florida Client St.Stephen's Church faces McFarlane Road and is adjacent to Peacock Park in the heart of Coconut St.Stephen's Episcopal Church Grove. In 2003, the Church envisioned a paved Labyrinth to occupy this space. A labyrinth is 2750 McFarlane Road utilized for prayer and meditation,in group events and solitary contemplation.The church wanted Coconut Grove,FL 33133 this space to be open to the community,and to be surrounded by a beautiful landscape. Due to funding problems,the project was put on hold until 2016,when a young parishioner decided to take on the task as his Boy Scout Eagle Scout project. Re-vitalized by this young man,the project Project Address came back to life. In February of 2017,the Labyrinth itself was constructed by the Boy Scout troop. 2750 McFarlane Road The shell path and landscaping that surrounds it is still under construction,with an estimated finish Coconut Grove,FL date of June 2017. The Coconut Grove Garden Club has volunteered to install and maintain 33133 the new landscaping,with the plants that are being donated by a parishioner. Curtis + Rogers designed the foundation for the Labyrinth,the surrounding shell paths,the Landscape and the Irrigation for this special project. This has been an unconventional collaborative project between Project Dates volunteers,the church,and paid consultants,to create a beneficial space for the community. 2016/2017 Reference Contact Pastor Wilifred Allen-Faiella % ,f _ t� � j 7 revwaf@sseds.org - �. ' .1401 :'' 7 ^ ,;�.; . 305-448-2601 f 5' ,. e 3 r ' d e— — No Ia • a2 *if— I -„ ,”.' R t 1--.. Y--wili 11 1, - - .. � �. -`LL'. , Leon Medical Center- Healing Gardens Miami & Hialeah, Florida Client Curtis + Rogers Design Studio Inc., has designed and overseen construction of five Healing Leon Medical Center Gardens at four different Leon Medical Centers (East Hialeah, West Hialeah, Flagler, and 27th 11501 SW 40th Street Avenue)The Gardens are heavily planted with lush full material. Palms, Bamboo, dense ground Miami,FL 33165 planting and a bubbling fountain help these spaces act as retreats from the bustling Medical Centers.The elegance,cleanliness and simplicity of the design contribute to the feeling of respect that exemplies the Leon Medical Centers. Medical evidence has demonstrated that stress and Project Address psychological factors have a detrimental effect on people's health.Today, the medical field is Leon Medical Center rediscovering the importance of the natural environment to the process of healing,and has begun 11501 SW 40th Street to re-prioritize the importance of the landscape in the design of medical facilities.Spaces where patients can interact with nature and natural views from inside the medical facility have been Miami,FL 33165 proven through studies to decrease recovery time of patients.The patients, relatives, as well as personnel of Leon Medical Center,can enjoy these gardens. It is our goal,to assist the patients, Project Dates visitors and employees of Leon Medical Center,and to create a feeling of well being and spiritual 2008/2017 peace through the use of nature and sensory experiences. Reference Contact I. -- - , :#. • Op a,,, Michael Shealy ' • -'� , r •1 °ac Michael.Shealy@ ,,r = , leonmedicalcenters.com , ,w-.....-. : 305-631-5933 A• J. .rf r ,: . �}^ r -r � '•...epi :`� .. _ - Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 115 Alexander Montessori Palmetto Bay, Florida r-i;e„t Curtis + Rogers provided landscape architectural services for this new building for the Ludlum James McGhee Campus. This LEED Gold Certified building.The Front drop-off/parking area was re-configured and additional parking was added on the north side of the campus.The green space between the Headmaster school and the road were enhanced with thick planting to buffer the road and to give the school 305 342-3739 a greener presence from the road. The architecture is reminiscent of a summer camp cottage, jrm2Aalexandermontessori.com utilizing natural materials,with exposed wood beams. There is a small cistern that captures the rainwater off the roof,and irrigates a section of the campus. To construct the building, it was Project Address necessary to remove a large oak tree. The headmaster used this as a learning experience for the 6050 57th Ave students who watched the tree being taken down and sections of its trunk are stored on site with SWplans to build some natural benches out of the wood. The school holds nature and ecological Miami,FL education in high regard,and the plant materials were selected to give a variety of different leaf 33143 typologies,which is one of their areas of study. Project Dates 2013/2017 } Aft Reference Contact James McGhee Headmaster ww.. 305 342-3739 • . e�.� A a jrm2Aalexandermontessori.com f Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC C;hio Mariana Boldu Director of Innovation &Resilience Design/Landscape Architect As the Director of Innovation&Resilience Design,Mariana brings to C+R her experience as a sharp designer,and an effective team builder with over 20 years of international practice. gistration She leads design to integrate landscape strategies that are sustainable, resilient, and that Registered Landscape balance the built and natural environment,and the community's life needs while responding Architect,State of Florida to the pressing current dynamics of climate change. LA 6667246 Her unique triple background in Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, along with her rich and extensive educational and professional experience, has allowed State of Colorado her to contribute to a wide range of project types and scales, from planning through LA 0000582 construction. In addition to her extensive experience working within the governmental framework as a Registered Architect, designer,she served as the Director of the Urban Design,Landscape&Planning Department Misiones Argentina for the Posadas City Government in Misiones, Argentina, where she led a department of N:M002617 multidisciplinary professionals.She integrates her dual perspective on the complexities of governmental entity operations into every project she undertakes.She excels at managing project demands while leading and supervising project teams in both office and construction Affiliation settings.Her extensive construction management experience includes responsibility for CA/ Member-The American CO,RFI and Field Reports,as well as simultaneous direction of multiple landscape crews on Society of Landscape the installation of intensive and extensive green roof decks and streetscapes at Brickell City Architects Centre. Her collaborative leadership style and outcome-oriented management experience has resulted in a vast portfolio that demonstrates excellence of design and leadership. Mariana is a Registered Landscape Architect in Florida and Colorado, a Registered Architect in Argentina, a LEED Accredited Professional, and a member of the ASLA FLASLA 2017-Brickell City Centre-Award of Excellence, Environmental Sustainability Open Space, Parks and Recreation Experience Honor Award,Frederic B Miami Marine Stadium,Miami,FL Stresau Award. Alice Wainwright Park,Miami,FL Science City Campus;Niherst,Trinidad and Tobago FLASLA 2015-NIHERST Harry A.Nottingham Park Master plan'Avon,Colorado Science City-Award of P3&J Urban Park;Vail,Colorado Honor-Planning and Donovan Park Master Plan;Vail,Colorado Analysis. San Ignacio Waterfront Restoration;Misiones,Argentina *denotes experience prior to Environmental Theme Park;Vitoria-Gasteiz,Spain Curtis+Rogers Design Studio Education Civic Experience State University of New York Broward Convention Center&Hotel;,Fort Lauderdale,FL Master in Walking Mountains-Gore Range Natural Science School;Avon,Colorado Landscape Architecture State Veterans Cemetery; Grand Junction,Colorado Posadas Main Street and Downtown Urban Renewal;Posadas City,Argentina University of Cordoba Felix T.Garzon-State School of Music;Cordoba,Argentina Graduate Architecture Degree Urban Experience Employment Miami Baywalk-Riverwalk's Unifying Element&Brand;Miami,FL The Link at Douglas Station;Miami,Florida 2017-Present Brickell City Centre;Miami,Florida Curtis+Rogers Design Grove at Grand Bay;Miami,Florida Studio Inc 2014-2017 LEED Experience Arquitectonica GEO 2013-2014 Brickell City Centre;Miami,Florida Raymond Jungles Inc. Grove at Grand Bay;Miami,Florida 2005-2012 Faena House,Miami Beach,Florida VAg.Architects&Planners Walking Mountains-Gore Range Natural Science School;Avon,Colorado 2000-2005 Design Workshop,Inc 1994-1999 BDT Architects&Associates Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 4 Alice Wainwright Park Master Plan Miami, Florida Client Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.was retained by the City of Miami,Florida to provide design and City of Miami agency permit approvals services for the renovation of the waterfront area of Alice Wainwright Park. Capital Improvements& Major program elements included the renovation of the existing"sea wall"and a new baywalk. Transportation Program Complementing the existing shade pavilions, new event lawns areas were delineated. Native 444 SW 2nd Avenue shade trees and palms were proposed to replace existing invasive trees that would be removed. Miami,Florida 33130 The proposed design of the park considers the future connections to Plan Z Miami to Rickenbacker Trail on the north end and to the Commodore Trail on the west end of the park.Resilience design Project Address is a major strategythroughout all the proposed interventions.From the salt resistant vegetation and City of Miami sensitive transition to the Native Forest Community on the North West area to the use of innovative 2845 Brickell Ave permeablepathtechnologiesandsolarlighting.Landscapeimprovementsincludednewsitefurniture Miami,Florida that integrates city wide preferred alternatives with natural stone sourced benches that recreate and 33129 celebrates the exiting Silver Bluff formations of the site.The proposed geometry of the baywalk was inspired by the curvilinear forms found at the breaking waves on the sandy beaches of Miami, Project Dates softening the transition of the hard sea wall to the water.Open unobstructed views out to the sea are 2017/2018 maintained while shade is provided thought seating areas and around the open lawn event spaces. Reference Contact Carlos Lozano City of Miami r r � f1 � , Project Manager (305)416-1247 .;c, • .."••�,. '.� � . a� _ . -,... . .._...... .Ir.--J., - Annex Park Evaluation Hialeah, Florida Client The City of Hialeah hired Curtis+Rogers to provide a technical evaluation to a design of a Debora Storch,NCARB planned City park,being developed and constructed by a private developer. The goa of the Planning&Zoning Official evaluation report goal was to review the design and the proposed plant material for the Annex City of Hialeah Park referred as Countyline Corporate Park located along W 36th Avenue/NW 97th Ave between 900 East 56 St,Bldg#1 W 108th Street/NW 162 Street and W 100 Street/NW 154 Street. The park,consisting of two Hialeah,FL 33013 parcels-approximately 15 acres each,will be conveyed to the City of Hialeah upon completion of construction.The City wanted to ensure that the park's design was consisted with the goals Project Address established by City staff. NW 97th Ave Curtis&Rogers provided a comprehensive evaluation to ensure that the design and ultimate Between NW 162nd Ave & construction would: NW 154th St. • Have the characteristics of a natural preserve. • Be as maintenance free as possible. Project Dates Promote passive uses November 2017 December 2017 • Provide canopy trees for shade. • Avoid lawn areas thereby minimizing maintenance. Reference Contact Debora Storch,NCARB _ -.r..'� Planning&Zoning Official r .1 ✓ City of Hialeah , -%15, 1 •-f'/ � .=v� 900 East 56 St,Bldg#1 i{= 1�" / "f)'i'' y `i0. _ r i Hialeah,FL 33013 ,r� �\ r f� y/` r Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 7 Miami Baywalk- Riverwalk's Brand Downtown Miami, Florida `he' Curtis+Rogers participated on an RFP/Design competition to develop a brand identity DDA_Downtown for the Miami Baywalk-Riverwalk within the limits of Miami's DDA boundaries for a total Development Authority of 10 miles stretch. The firm teamed up with the internationally recognized Danish artist SUPERFLEX to Project Address develop a nature inspired collective art installation proposal to shape the new identity of Miami Downtown the Miami's downtown waterfront. Project Dates The proposed intervention celebrates the merging the merging of two colossal Summer 2017 Ecosystems:the Ocean and the City. This celebration will materialize as a glimpse of the city's future;facing and embracing the potential changes we face with Sea Level Reference Contact Rise and Global Warming.We proposed making visible the invisible by taking the Mrs.Prisca Tomasi structure of the ocean floor and expressing it on the City floor;creating an extraordinary Miami Downtown Development and iconic waterfront of Ocean-inspired expressions and processes.Giant coral life Authority forms would crawl out of the sea to become landmark elements. Through programing 200 S.Biscayne Blvd. they will engage the users and will unify the waterfront as amenities that celebrate the Suite 2929 diversity of ocean life and the upbeat-diverse synergy of Miami's Downtown. Miami,FL 33131 305.579.6675 ' .iw millir tomasi@miamidda.com www.miamidda.com :i „ 4 F-� 1: :.;,. r ! iS 3 � , „: , . II ..._ I x _s=ue. .3. � . , ,., ..___:, .... ; ,:-_,_ ,:i., -710 •°- !.-..''' ''' — 'mie ' 41 m Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 7 • Ruben Colon Certified Landscape Inspector/ Landscape Designer ........ ... . a and detaoed ceHdpof experience in the development and implementationil of constructionlandsdocuments contributees to his ability to expeditehighly projects of varying complexity and budgets. Her.is proficient in Autocad, Adobe Photoshop,organized Sketch-up, as well as having excellent apedesignhand drawing and sketching skills. He is an outstanding project managerrientand is extremely efficientis working with multidisciplinary teams. Education Florida International University Parks Experience Master of Landscape Architecture Antonia Maceo Park;Miami,FL Bryan Park;Miami,FL Florida International University Cuban Museum;Miami,Florida FPL Solar Center;Miami-Dade,FL Bachelor of Arts in Architecture Hialeah Cultural Park;Hialeah,FL Samson Oceanfront Park;Sunny Isles,Florida Employment 2014 Present Civic Experience Landscape Designer Arcola Police Station;Miami,Florida Broward College Parking Garage;Davie,Florida Curtis+Rogers Design Studio Inc. Broward Fire Station 49;Broward County,Florida Doral Police Substation;Doral,FL 2012-201-i Hialeah Garage;Hialeah,Florida MD Mental Health;Miami,FL Freelance Landscape Designer Miami Children's Museum;Miami,Florida San Juan,Puerto Rico Miami Dade College North Campus;Miami,FL Miami Dade Children's Courthouse;Miami,Florida 2011-2017 Miami Dade College Parking Garage Plaza;Miami,Florida Miami Gardens Community Center;Miami Gardens,Florida FEMA-Region II-Project Specialist Miami International Airport;Miami,Florida Guaynabo,Puerto Rico South Dade Cultural Center;Miami-Dade County,Florida St.Stephens Church;Miami,Florida 2009-2011 Freelance Landscape Designer Streetscapes+Transportation Experience San Juan,Puerto Rico SW 15th Ave Streetscape-8th&7th Street;Miami,FL Coral Gables Tree Succession;Coral Gables,FL FDOT-SW 1st Street between Flagler and 5th Ave,Miami,Florida FDOT Krome Avenue;Homestead,FL FPL Coconut Grove Injection;Coral Gables,FL FDOT-Flagler Street between SW 27th Ave and SW 14th Ave,Miami,FL NE 2nd Ave Streetscape;Miami,FL Palm Grove Streetscape;Miami,FL Commercial/Residential Experience 1030 15th Street;Miami Beach,FL 2nd&2nd;Miami,FL Bunche Park Elementary School,Dade County Frederick Douglas Elementary School,Dade County Madie Ives K-8 Conversion Project,Dade County Miami BeacCURTIS + ROGERS (ily. RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC Antonio Maceo Park Miami, Florida Client Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.as part of Ferguson Glasgow Schuster and Soto's City of Miami team,was retained by the City of Miami,Florida to provide design and construction administration services for the renovation of the Antonio Maceo Park.Landscape Project Address improvements were necessary in response to the major architectural program elements, 5135 NW 7th St which included the extension of the community building in the park as well as the Miami,Florida 33126 redesign of a portion of the parking area.Landscape improvements included additional landscape buffering along the east and south edges of the parking area as well as new Project Dates trees and palm trees to complement the existing building and the new addition.Some October 2014-March 2016 of the existing mature royal palms were relocated along the promenade on the north end of the park,abutting the Blue Lagoon Lake. A mix of native trees and tropical Reference Contact flowering trees were used in order to add splashes of color,adding to the experience of Carlos Vasquez the neighbors that use the park for leisure and exercise purposes. City of Miami CIP Project Manager - goorml_ ' „„r, . .. . A ' LAW. .s. .r 6 .41100 ,7 •tm r- v. 1 46 Playground Coral Way Miami, Florida Client Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.in conjunction with Gurri Matute Architects were City of Miami retained by the City of Miami,Florida to provide design and construction administration Capital Improvements& services for the development of Coral Way Park.The park is a children's playground Transportation Program developed to serve the Shenandoah and The Roads communities.The main component 444 SW 2nd Avenue of the hardscape portion of the park is a beautifully executed cast-in-place curvilinear Miami,Florida 33130 seat wall that stretches all along the western edge of the park.This wall's configuration Project Address responds to the location of the proposed play structures and several existing flowering SW 12th Ave.&14th St. trees while also containing the landscape buffer to the west side of the park.Landscape Miami,Florida improvements included landscape buffering all around the perimeter of the park. A 33129 nice combination of low maintenance planting material was used to achieve simplistic, contemporary aesthetics. Project Dates March 2016-June 2017 Reference Contact t, •, r i Carlos Vasquez \ . ' �.. City of Miami CIP - =ti, . +. i ,,t 0, J}i I I ` �' II Project Manager ,,. `, '4 ,, �,, a— $ 4,, `.t'I op!,,,.1�• i II'1. " �. , .. k 4.o . l Bili #i' ' . ,_ . .111"11' I I 1 il i - i I 1 k'f• s �_ " .1 .; '.,,* Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC "- Miami Dade Solar Center - Polinator & Grassland Meadow Miami, Florida Client Florette Braun The Miami-Dade Solar Center's Pollinator Habitat aims to restore the natural environment Florida Power and Light with the use of native vegetation indigenous tothe region.The plan will create 3 distinctive 700 Universe Boulevard types of landscape habitats:an upland tree hammock,a polinator&grassland meadow, Juno Beach,Florida 33408 and a roadside habitat. Together, these areas will form an ecosystem that will serve to contrast the impacts of the surrounding lands dedicated to row crop growing.The Project Address reintroduction of the native plant material and the wildlife that it will attract will serve SW 136th St-SW 177th Ave. as a compliment to the clean energy produced by the Solar Center and can serve as a demonstration of sustainable principles for development. Project Dates June 2017-October 2017 Reference Contact -140 Florette Braun1, Ab.:$44/ Florida Power and Light x«� !0047 700 Universe Boulevard ps Juno Beach,Florida 33408 561 758-1580 rim 1 • Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 Jacob D. Lafever,Associate ASLA 411! Certified Arborist/Landscape Designer VIP Jacob possesses strong design and analysis skills, developed by working with a wide variety of conditions and environments across the United States. lie possesses outstanding graphic abilities which compliment his design skills, as well as a deep understanding of contemporary environmental challenges. In his final year of study at Purdue University, Jacob received a Merit award from the Indiana chapter of the ASLA for planning and design work done to reclaim an EPA Superfund site on the shore of 3'i 3 Lake Champlain in Burlington,Vermont, and was invited to become a teaching assistant The American Society of Landscape for junior-level design courses.Since joining the Curtis+Rogers team,Jacob has become Architects a certified arborist and has focused his work on several projects directly impacting the urban fabric of Miami. International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist Streetscapes +Transportation SW 8th St/Calle Ocho Historic District PD&E Study;Miami,Florida NW 79th/81st Street Project Development and Environment Study;Miami,Florida INASLA Student Design Works Merit FPL Ponce De Leon Coral Gables Transmission Line Impact Plan;Miami,Florida Award 2016 Palm Grove Historic Neighborhood Improvement;Miami,Florida - St.Thomas Episcopal Parish&School;Coral Gables,Florida Purdue University Burlington City Hall Park;Burlington,Vermont Bachelor of Science in Landscape O'Brien Home Farm Mixed-use Development;South Burlington,Vermont Architecture Rockefeller-Carnegie Estate;Connecticut Brattleboro Food Co-op;Brattleboro,Vermont Employment 2016-Present Urban Experience Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. The Link at Douglas Station;Miami,Florida Miami,Florida Miami City Center:Brickell Marketplace-Eighteen Tower;Miami,Florida 2937 Biscayne Tower;Miami,Florida 2014-2015 Wagner Hodgson Landscape Architecture Burlington,Vermont 2015 Purdue University Landscape Architecture Design Teaching Assistant West Lafayette,Indiana Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 6'N South Miami Arborist Reports South Miami, Florida City of South Cliami ient Jacob was the lead arborist for the City of South Miami's rotating tree permitting process,before and after hurricane Irma.From August to Project Address December 2017 Jacob evaluated trees for removal and maintenance on City of South Miami residential and commercial properties,and evaluated large and small Project Dates scale new development proposals on meeting tree code and preserving 2016/2017 important natural resources. Reference Contact Marcus Lightfoot 1 " ^? Sylva Martin Building 1 ,' �x 6130 Sunset Drive A' $ ' .A ik '� South Miami,FL 33143 .,'-'",f1,'- A'� ' \ % ' s .. 305-663-6326 ` mlightfoot@southmiamifl.gov / y ,,. - *` , \ III► mum - d 1 4{ 't �• C1 't1... Y'Mp «`•t „, a. Palm Grove Miami, Florida Client Jacob designed a canopy restoration layout for the beautification of the Keith Ng Palm Grove historic neighborhood.The existing canopy of the district Capital Improvements& Transportation Program was inventoried, rehabilitated,and preserved,and several new species 444 5W 2nd Ave.8th Floor were introduced to further enhance the neighborhood's residential Miami,FL 33130 streets. • 305416-1298 keithngmiamigov.com Project Address Area between: NE 58th St.to NE 77th St. --.. - - , &from: . s Biscayne Blvd to NE 4th Ct. - -• " �` i" Project Dates S! *- . October 2016-December 2018 j ; f .! 1j ti Reference Contact . .+.......� , -14 — +..r . r ` ' N Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC �7 Franjo Road Palmetto Bay, Florida Client Curtis+Rogers prepared a response to a request for proposal by the Village of Palmetto Village of Palmetto Bay Bay, regarding the redevelopment of Franjo Road,from US1/South Dixie Highway to SW 184th Street. Curtis+Rogers staff developed a palette of hardscape and furnishings Project Address in response to the Village's desire to provide a contemporary and innovative"look". The Granjo Rd,Palmetto Bay main corridor and its intersecting roadways,was designed with wide sidewalks and shaded canopy trees for pleasant walking. Dramatic signage demarcated the area,and amenities Project Dates such as various seating options, kiosks, lighting and a wide open promenade will serve to January 2017-June 2017 activate the redevelopment of the Village's downtown core. Reference Contact — N/A .. rro `a,, L P;1 j400 r 1 R g V e+a `ro t x e. 1 10 1t1:.. 1 I r - --_,- ,r., ....... I _ ...„.;..„,,, - _„,-%, ;„ „zfiK — Arojlili 4 -- - t SW • Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS (l RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 Tab 5 Required Forms 5.1 Standard Form 330 ARCHITECT - ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS PART I-CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS A. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) Miami Beach Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Capital Renewal and Replacement Projects 2.PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 3.SOLICITATION OR PROJECT NUMBER 02/15/2018 RFQ 2018-141-ND B. ARCHITECT-ENGINEER POINT OF CONTACT 4.NAME AND TITLE Aida M. Curtis-Principal 5.NAME OF FIRM Curtis + Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 6.TELEPHONE NUMBER 7.FAX NUMBER 8.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305 442 1774 305 445 9488 aida@curtisrogers.com C. PROPOSED TEAM (Complete this section for the prime contractor and all key subcontractors.) (Check) 9.FIRM NAME 10.ADDRESS 11. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT Curtis+ Rogers Design 7520 S. Red Road, Suite M Landscape Architecture a. X Studio, Inc. Miami, Florida 33143 ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE b. ❑CHECK IF BRANCH OFFICE D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM ❑ (Attached) STANDARD FORM 330(612004) PAGE 1 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 67.0. E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Aida M.Curtis,RLA,ASLA Principal in Charge a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 29 21 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. South Miami,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Texas A&M University Landscape Architect: Florida,LA 0001330 Bachelor of Science of Landscape Architecture,1983 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations, Training,Awards,etc.) Affiliations:Member of The American Society of Landscape Architects/Awards:ASLA Certificate for Excellence in the study of Landscape Architecture 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Garden of the Arts Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Hialeah,Florida 2013-2015 2015 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Hialeah Cultural Park is envisioned to be a lush tropical park tucked into a quiet urban community. The neighborhood has little to no existing public a. space amenities,so the City of Hialeah working with FPL found a creative way to provide much needed green space.The land,donated by FPL,is an existing FPL transmission right-of-way currently not accessible to the public. FPL collaborated with our design team to create a park which fits the functional requirements of a transmission right-of-way while providing a meandering path through rich vegetation for people to stroll and learn about the rich history of Hialeah.The C+R team designed elements into the park plazas to enhance the story of Hialeah from its roots in the Native Americans who named Hialeah(meaning"High Prairie")to the Hialeah Park Racetrack today and through the future. The landscape within the plazas will serve as a backdrop for local artists'interpretive work throughout the park.Cost$2,000,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2010-2013 2013-2014 b (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Landscape architectural services for this design-build urban community park's redevelopment included a synthetic turf football field,covered accessible playground,picnic shelters,vita course trail,a splash park and a pool.The park was originally opened in 1980 and named for Pastor Theodore Gibson, but had fallen into disrepair. The residents of the historic Overtown neighborhood of Miami are very excited to have their park back and much improved. The bright colors pay homage to the Bahamian ancestry of the founders of Overtown.Cost:$9,794,667.00 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED The Mildred Claude Pepper Bayfront Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2009 2010 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm In 2007,the City of Miami commissioned a"Capital Improvement Plan"for Bayfront Park. This plan was preceded by work done for the City in 2003 by the BNV Corporation.The Capital Improvement Plan built on the recommendations of BNV who suggested the following improvements:1)address the park's "empty heart"; 2) make the Baywalk a "pleasurable walk"by decreasing the scale and adding much needed shade; 3) investigate the c. feasibility of creating a restaurant/retail space at the base of the non-functioning "laser light tower"; 4) connect the amphitheater to Bayside Marketplace,the Baywalk and the hotel to the south;5)enhance the good features like the Rock Garden and the lawns;6)address the need for shade by planting shade trees;7)address the existing paths which"frustrate"the desire for direct functional access,particularly between the downtown area and the bay;8)improve the horticulture;9)address the perimeters of the park which tend to be"parched and dull"and/or"complicated and ugly";and 10) provide informational and wayfinding signage. Curtis + Rogers along with their sub consultants produced three documents for the "Capital Improvements Plan."The first was an in-depth analysis of the park including functional environmental and aesthetic issues,the second was a series of proposed improvements which could be staged and the third was an estimate of cost. The initial phase of new construction, which includes improvements to the Baywalk,was completed in April 2010. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED d. Flagler Streetscapes PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2012-2014 2015-2017 STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS (igio, RFQ 2018-141ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jennifer Rogers Landscape Architect a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 9 9 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.South Miami Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) FIU—Masters of Landscape Architecture Landscape Architect:Florida LA-6667093 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) Affiliations:Member of The American Society of Landscape Architects 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Melreese Golfcourse and Clubhouse and Restaurant PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2007 2013 a. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm The new clubhouse and restaurant is the City of Miami's first LEED project.Due to the City of Miami's commitment in attaining their first LEED project it was decided that the highest amount of water reduction points by not installing a permanent irrigation system would be obtained.In order to create a viable landscape,all plants selected were highly drought tolerant and predominantly native.The landscape design also took into consideration preservation of existing trees including a Royal Poinciana tree that had historical significance to the area.Cost:$4,500,000.00 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2010-2012 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm b. Landscape architectural services for this design-build urban community park's redevelopment included a synthetic turf football field,covered accessible playground,picnic shelters,vita course trail,a splash park and a pool. The park was originally opened in 1980 and named for Pastor Theodore Gibson,but had fallen into disrepair. The residents of the historic Overtown neighborhood of Miami are very excited to have their park back and much improved.The bright colors pay homage to the Bahamian ancestry of the founders of Overtown.Cost:9,794,667.00 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Palmetto Mini-Golf PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(Il applicable) Miami,Florida 2002 2008 C. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Beef scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+ Rogers,together with Peter Olsen and Associates,developed the design criteria for the development and construction of a miniature golf course adjacent to the Palmetto Golf Course. The goal for the project was to introduce families and others into the game of golf by providing a realistic experience in miniature golf.Cost:500,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Pine Jog Elementary 1 FAU Nature Center Facility PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Palm Beach,Florida 2006 2008 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm d. Located in an ecologically sensitive pineland area as well as being the first LEED project for the Palm Beach School District,Pine Jog Elementary uses the context of its surroundings and the objectives of the FAU Nature Center Facility to create an environmentally sensitive educational program to teach children as well as the school staff and the general public about the benefits of sustainable building.The landscape uses 100%native plants which are ecologically appropriate to a pineland habitat in this area of Florida and has significantly reduced the amount of potable water used for irrigation.Cost:$30 million (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Aventura Arts&Cultural Center PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2009 2010 6 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if projectperformed with current firm Curtis+Rogers did the landscape,irrigation and LEED Design for this new Performing Arts Center for the City of Aventura. The Center is sited at the end of a spit of land overlooking Dumbfounding Bay. This LEED certified project required Shoreline Review and special planting considerations because of LEED and its location next to the Bay.Cost:$7,750,000 STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC (Ai, (1)TITLE AND LOCAL JON(Lily and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Flagler StrMbcapes PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONS rRUC FUN(!t applicable) Miami,Florida 2012 Estimated 2012 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Beef scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if projec performed with current firm The goals of the Flagler Streetscape project are to provide wider sidewalks,selective parallel parking/loading areas,grading/drainage improvements,and landscape and hardscape enhancements that augment a vibrant downtown commercial area.The objectives for these improvements are to provide areas for outdoor cafes with unified furnishings,lighting and landscaping that enhances visitor experiences of the area. Flagler's long historic significance has been taken into consideration in the planning and design of these improvements.Extents of the project are Flagler Street from NW 2nd Avenue to Biscayne Boulevard. Since Flagler Street is considered the City of Miami's"main street",many parties are involved in the planning and implementation of this project. The project is being managed by the City of Miami's Capital Improvements Division(CIP),working in conjunction with the Downtown Development Authority(DDA),and specifically with the Flagler Street Steering Committee.Cost:$5,250,000 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2O18 141-NO DESIGN STUDIO,INC 64. E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Mariana Boldu Director of Innovation&Resilience Design a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 24 1 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.South Miami,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) State of New York—Master in Landscape Architecture Florida—LA 6667246 18.OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications.Organizations,Training,Awards,etc.) ASLA Certificate for Excellence in the Study of landscape Architecture 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Alice Wainwright Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,FL 2017 2018 a. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Id Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.was retained by the City of Miami,Florida to provide design and agency permit approvals services for the renovation of the waterfront area of Alice Wainwright Park.Major program elements included the renovation of the existing"sea wall"and a new baywalk.Cost:$3,500,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED FDOT 79th Street PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION df applicable) Miami,Florida 2017 N/A b. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm . Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.was retained by Stantec to render services for the Florida Department of Transportation,for the Project Development and Environment(PD&E)for SR 934/NE/NW 79 Street from West of 1-95(13 CT)to the end of SR 934/1 Way PT.Also,subsequent design alternatives to evaluate corridors improvements will follow in coordination with the Complete Street context classification initiative.Cost:N/A (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coral Gables Tree Succession Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,FL 2012 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope.size.cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers were hired by the City of Coral Gables to develop a Tree Succession and Initiation Plan for the trees in single family residential areas. c. The Curtis+Rogers's team provided an evaluation of existing street trees,from visual/horticultural conditions. The trees where mapped,identified and conditions were added to them,and areas where trees were missing were identified as possible locations for tree replacements. Over 38,800 trees were evaluated. Curtis+Rogers attended community meetings to seek input and present preliminary findings. Ultimately the team created maps for street planting themes,and listed the trees needing immediate replacement,identified locations for new trees and recommended others for further evaluation in 5 years. Over 2500 trees are being replaced. This plan enabled the City to develop a program for systematic replacement of trees to ensure the longevity of the canopy—which characterizes the City Beautiful.Cost:$2.5-$3 million for initial implementation (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coconut Grove Streetscape Improvements PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2013 2014 d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm The goal of the project was to review the existing problems with brick lifting and root intrusions in the sidewalks and evaluate existing tree conditions,while maintaining the existing wonderful character of Coconut Grove. A combination of solutions have been proposed and include new trees planted in conditions optimal for future growth,maintaining existing trees while improving their immediate growing environment and replacement of bricks set in a more suitable base material.Cost$6,000,000 Phase I (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Baywalk-Riverwalk's Brand Development PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2017 N/A STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 Miami Beach CURTIS ROGERS re RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Ruben Colon Landscape Designer a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 7 3 15 FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.South Miami,Florida 16 EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Florida International University—Master of Landscape Architecture Florida International University—Bachelor of Arts in Architecture 18 OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications,Organizations, Training,Awards,etc.) 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Coral Gables Tree Succession Plan PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2012 2014 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers were hired by the City of Coral Gables to develop a Tree Succession and Initiation Plan for the trees in single family residential a. areas. The Curtis+Rogers's team provided an evaluation of existing street trees,from visuaVhorticultural conditions. The trees where mapped, identified and conditions were added to them,and areas where trees were missing were identified as possible locations for tree replacements. Over 38,800 trees were evaluated.Curtis+Rogers attended community meetings to seek input and present preliminary findings. Ultimately the team created maps for street planting themes,and listed the trees needing immediate replacement,identified locations for new trees and recommended others for further evaluation in 5 years. Over 2500 trees are being replaced. This plan enabled the City to develop a program for systematic replacement of trees to ensure the longevity of the canopy—which characterizes the City Beautiful.Cost:$2.5-$3 million for initial implementation (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Flagler Streetscapes PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2011 N/A (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm The goals of the Flagler Streetscape project are to provide wider sidewalks,selective parallel parking/loading areas,grading/drainage b improvements,and landscape and hardscape enhancements that augment a vibrant downtown commercial area.The objectives for these improvements are to provide areas for outdoor cafes with unified furnishings,lighting and landscaping that enhances visitor experiences of the area. Flagler's long historic significance has been taken into consideration in the planning and design of these improvements.Extents of the project are Flagler Street from NW 2nd Avenue to Biscayne Boulevard. Since Flagler Street is considered the City of Miami's°main street",many parties are involved in the planning and implementation of this project.The project is being managed by the City of Miami's Capital Improvements Division(CIP),working in conjunction with the Downtown Development Authority(DDA),and specifically with the Flagler Street Steering Committee.Cost:$5,250,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Samson Oceanfront Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Sunny Isles,Florida 2014 2015 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm c. One of the last remnant parks displaying the historic art-deco architecture in Sunny Isles,this oceanfront park in the heart of the city required a new functional design sensitive to its historic elements and the natural ecology of the area. C+R working with engineers RJ Behar+Associates and architects Icon Design Group designed a new playground,stage area,and concert lawn area to be woven into the existing fabric of the park. Sensitivity to ecological conditions were taken with careful lighting design around this sea turtle nesting site and protection and maintenance of the established dune vegetation. TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Children's Courthouse PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2013 2015 d (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ® Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers is part of a multidisciplinary design team for this important civic project in downtown Miami. Attention has been given to the fabric of the outdoor spaces and functions within the cultural arts and civic center hub of the city. The site responds to the needs of the facility and its occupants as well as incorporating Art in Public Places. The objectives are to provide a comfortable and functional urban space that serves the needs of its users as well as the general public. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Miami Dads College—Hialeah Campus PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2013 2015 STANDARD FORM 330(112004)PAGE 2 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 1 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers led the Planting and Irrigation Design for this LEED urban County College Campus that was looking to"Green"their image,both literally and in sustainable design. The plan includes outdoor plaza/seating areas for the cafes,lawn areas for casual recreation and outdoor movie watching,an exercise path,and a garden area for study and relaxation. Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC E.RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT (Complete one Section E for each key person.) 12.NAME 13.ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14.YEARS EXPERIENCE Jacob Lafever Landscape Designer a.TOTAL b.WITH CURRENT FIRM 4 2 15.FIRM NAME AND LOCATION(City and State) Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. South Miami,Florida 16.EDUCATION(DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION) 17.CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION(STATE AND DISCIPLINE) Purdue University Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture 18 OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS(Publications.Organizations, Training,Awards.etc.) INASLA Student Design Works Merit Award,2016 19.RELEVANT PROJECTS (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Alice Wainwright Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,FL 2017 2018 a. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.was retained by the City of Miami,Florida to provide design and agency permit approvals services for the renovation of the waterfront area of Alice Wainwright Park.Major program elements included the renovation of the existing"sea wall"and a new baywalk.Cost: $3,500,000 (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Flagier Streetscapes PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2012-2014 2015-2017 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost,etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm The project goal is to reconfigure the Flagler Street from NW 2nd Ave to Biscayne Blvd,to provide wider sidewalks,selective parallel parking/loading b. areas,grading/drainage improvements,and landscape and hardscape enhancements commensurate with a vibrant downtown commercial area. The goal for these improvements is to provide areas for outdoor cafes,together with unified furnishings, lighting and landscape to enhance the visitor experience of the area. Flagler's long historic significance has been taken into consideration in the planning and design of these improvements. Given that Flagler is the considered the City of Miami's"main street",many parties are involved in the planning and implementation of the project.The project is being managed by the City of Miami's Capital Improvements Division(CIP),working in conjunction with the Downtown Development Authority (DDA),specifically with the Flagler Street Steering Committee.Cost:$5,250,000 TITLE AND LOCATION.C.ty and State' (2)YEAR COMPLETED South Miami—Arborist Reports PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,FL 2017 N/A C. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Br efscope.size.cost.etc AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Lead arborist for the City of South Miami's rotating tree permitting process,before and after hurricane Irma.From August to December 2017 Jacob evaluated trees for removal and maintenance on residential and commercial properties, and evaluated large and small scale new development proposals on meeting tree code and preserving important natural resources. (1)TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED University of Miami-Cox Science PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2012-2013 2017 d. (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size.cost.etc)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm Curtis+Rogers collaborated with Perkins&Will on an updating of the frontage and plaza of the Cox Science Center at the University of Miami Coral Gables Campus. The planting beds step upward to meet the grade of the main floor of the building.The design incorporates plaza seating,an outdoor classroom space,and outdoor lawn area with a raised concrete pattern of atomic structure to sit on. I TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) (2)YEAR COMPLETED Florida International University Parking Garage 6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2013-2015 2017 (3)BRIEF DESCRIPTION(Brief scope,size,cost.etc.)AND SPECIFIC ROLE ❑ Check if project performed with current firm e. Due to the success of the earlier Parking Garage 5 a second and similar multi-function parking garage with amenities was designed and constructed.The facility provides dining options as well as much needed parking and provides connection to other campus facilities such as the School of Architecture and School of Engineering.Large Royal Palms frame and scale the monumental structure and provide definition to the areas adjacent to the building. Shade trees are provided along walkways. STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 2 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC (.10. F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 1 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED North Shore Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(Il applicable) Miami Beach, Florida N/A 1998-2004 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Department of Parks Recreation Mr.Kevin Smith (305)673-7730 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,Florida 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) e. The 7.8 acre park contains a renovated tennis center with hydro-tennis courts,a new community center,a multipurpose athletic field Complex,renovated basketball courts,a fully accessible playground facility and a pedestrian promenade. . ®:" {. . ' + •� r. •. i '` 1 • .,• --A—, �,.1'4* :�u 1.- V AI '/ ''4. Z�. '' y '. YL '.�f�. ` .'+. �8 4,S•,Y • >� i '�M lry it � �°T: w:. .,4,v ok 4 r^., A y. 04 5*i`k'xt1 -v7•b a.. .,' ,,,'''."1,.... 341[4 s't , ,..s* •, ... -'# �,� '*. _ f ad+• ••T I�: _ ';., 'y'. . a _ ,:....._ .::$1...:111%....,1 t 4 eet4.c 1,tp.I.N.....4.- -e, :::'•..: . -,,..-„,","4 to. -- _ -i ,s • ,.) i t ,✓•!• =rte •e.? * ,-.10115" �..-.7�C -aY^" .- ...i ff ! r ., - ! � filifi ¢i --� —�� • _ = — F I ,yam , r , 1�', • sem . LI.. el A i � 4111affil, ,_ 71 sl , i; i1 . - j rt}wgi1 _ iFi- •� iia M �.._ ..)4*„4 3c _ b • i� lei. toc. ��A11 �*.,�„��! <� ii elm ,.. , Ali _�_ �� s 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Curtis+Rogers Design Studio, Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Inc. STANDARD FORM 330( 42004)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 115 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 2 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Lummus Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(lfapplicable) Miami Beach,Florida N/A 1998-2001 23.PROJECT OWNERS INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Park Recreation&Culture Mr.Kevin Smith (305)673-7730 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,FL 33139 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Lummus Park,a 32 acre park located in the heart of the world-renowned Art Deco District was renovated using funds from the Miami Beach Parks Improvement Bonds.The improvements included a state-of-the-art irrigation system that is controlled and monitored via a main computer,new and renovated restrooms,new playgrounds,upgrade of site furnishings,new walkways,enhancement of the entries at each cross street,ADA compliance, the restoration and enhancement of the°historic"coconut palm grove canopy and the addition of accessible pathways to the beach. Y► 4 '� I *,� a ,,r,1, It 141111k : Yy '„ ' '!# / ' • 4 . 'L. ot Ik rr. . L i ;it_ t 4;Te'''41.i t ,w I �� N .�. INiti i f ice...di" y • 4. s � , �. � 1, .. • Pi- 1 107-L-- . . e . _ ',Si '.'- "-i c .., ill' It 441k----, • - 3riekii4lilikil ,, , . r rI,b 1 IIIc v�I1 •,., NMI OW" _rw O " --146, ...an. 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Curtis+Rogers Design Studio, Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Inc. STANDARD FORM 330(1(2004)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS ri RFQ 2018 141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 3 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Pinetree Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(1/applicable) Miami Beach,Florida N/A 1998-2001 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Beach Park Recreation&Culture Mr.Kevin Smith (305)673-7730 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,FL 33139 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The project renovates this existing 7.75 acre neighborhood park.A small parking lot was created,the roadway edge improved by the installation of bollards,and signage was provided.The new planting are native species selected to complement the existing vegetation consisting of mangroves and upland hammock plants.An automatic irrigation system was also installed in the park. 11y 1. T,• ,�z ,- 1•e . ''�+�.:`' yr WtIti• ---A. . ''•.'-- '7", • 'r. vt ( k„ .. l X. ❑ .. -, .4--;. . "r. y„ p - l ,� • y Z 1 -. - --- c. .w ` .- • s Aft ' - a t .+�`- *, ......- 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE IL, Curtis+Rogers Design Studio, Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Inc. STANDARD FORM 330(1x2004)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC .- F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 4 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED The Mildred Claude Pepper Bayfront Park Baywalk PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2009 2012 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Bayfront Park Management Trust Mr.Tim Schmand 305-358-7550 301 N Biscayne Boulevard Miami,Florida 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) The Baywalk project is the first phase of new construction implementing the Capital Improvements Plan done by Curtis+Rogers. The Baywalk portion +vas first priority due to the fact that there were so many pavements,no shade and no place for people to sit along the bay. The improvements included cutting out some of the pavement to make room for a row of large oak trees along the baywalk which now provides much needed shade. In addition to the trees,benches were installed along the baywalk facing Biscayne Bay where people can now enjoy the view and the shade provided by the oak trees. Another asset along the baywalk is the sandy beach where movable Adirondack chairs have been placed under coconut palms.This area was also enhanced with the addition of more coconut palms along the beach and at the fountain,in newly created cutouts. Cost:$600,000-Phase I 4 tt. .�! ` llefef• c I I( ). r, It .. G = .a+ .1�,.s' .ua �- s t G e 6 :P. ;�: .k• 1.:-. ..:11-1:10.111,,' 1 11 1 I11111'il ' . • ;. • :AA?, l' -`'.4* Lia '' • Mt __ � , a9 lt� it i� iliV - _. V� _.,......... . ... .zw- - F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 5 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21 TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Deering Canoe Drop PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(ll applicable) Miami,Florida 2008-2010 NIA 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER Miami-Dade Parks&Recreation Ms.Karen Cheney 305-755-7922 275 NW 2nd Street Suite 408 Miami,FL 33128 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) 74....`; t The Canoe Drop off project is one of many construction projects to be �'°r.f ' . ; t,: , completed at the Deering Estate,a 436-acre bayfront park locatedAi t adjacent to Biscayne National Park and the Biscayne Bay Aquatic : Preserve.The site is considered by many to be one of the most t- .,., .4.;-.,4:14 ' 40...\ ? important public properties in South Florida,and is valued for its rich 165,01 t natural,historical,architectural and archaeolo ical si nificance. , 4 �r'� `" R The property contains unique natural areas including one of the largest a�k, ° `` ,.,,, ecosystems of endangered pine rockland habitat,as well as rockland rJ hammocks,tropical hardwood hammocks,mangroves and salt marshes. _. a 1,, y .,,;'.` , t.; Approximately 430 species of rare and native plants and animals can be "'° Id found on the site. The Estate contains archaeological sites dating !'�>.',-.,..:141414 human presence to 10,000 years that include a Tequesta burial mound ``' and prehistoric midden,considered to be one of the best-preserved prehistoric coastal sites in Miami-Dade County. The Canoe Drop off Area was designed and constructed while minimizing impact of the natural environment. Curtis+Rogers worked r S' closely with the contractor on site to layout the drive and parking area which was placed in an area that was already disturbed. As part of this ' Z, project the surrounding areas were enhanced with additional endemic ''.-. • % •,•••*,,a species. S �. ..a ,v,..iii;, - 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT 1 (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) I (3)ROLE a. Curtis+Rogers Design Studio, Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Inc. , STANDARD FORM 330(112004)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFC)2018-141-NDDESIGN STUDIO, INC 7 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 6 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Hialeah Cultural Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Hialeah,Florida 2013-2015 3.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Hialeah Mr.Vincente Rodriguez 305.687.2620 900 East 56 St,Bldg.1 Hialeah,Florida 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size, and cost) Hialeah Cultural Park is envisioned to be a lush tropical park tucked into a quiet urban community. The neighborhood has little to no existing public space amenities,so the City of Hialeah working with FPL found a creative way to provide much needed green space.The land,donated by FPL,is an existing FPL transmission right-of-way currently not accessible to the public. FPL collaborated with our design team to create a park which fits the functional requirements of a transmission right-of-way while providing a meandering path through rich vegetation for people to stroll and learn about the rich history of Hialeah. The C+R team designed elements into the park plazas to enhance the story of Hialeah from its roots in the Native Americans who named Hialeah (meaning"High Prairie")to the Hialeah Park Racetrack today and through the future. The landscape within the plazas will serve as a backdrop for local artists'interpretive work throughout the park.Cost 2,000,000 J r( 'Z :, „. c z . r., .a.l,, 4.4 i . .. ,.....e .:,,, .--.. ...--,........1.[ ,_,. 0 s, ,. IN, 4 • • :\Pit ,41rei—"4 1 . • .,_,,,,,„*.'.A, M '`r d• � .' 44 � ji.` « , eg. P,fi „,,A,S"...., .i p y at,g • ,, }-t:A -~- _ ( t14/>'.4 a = b' ' 474; •}W �,_ ,.1 N Stn ''�,t •n '� i:. X �:_ _ •:; x --, If 25. FIRMS ECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 7 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Alice Wainwright Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If eppiiable) Miami,Florida 2017-2018 N/A 23. PROJECT OWNERS INFORMATION a PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Mr.Carlos Lozano 305 4161247 Capital Improvements&Transportation Program 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc.was retained by the City of Miami,Florida to provide t r' design and agency permit approvals services for the renovation of the waterfront area of Alice Wainwright Park.Major program elements included the renovation of the existing t1i 'sea wall'and a new baywalk.Complementing the existing shade pavilions,new event �ra { j lawns areas were delineated.Native shade trees and palms were proposed to replace '.err J 1 I existing invasive trees that would be removed. The proposed design of the park considers the future connections to Plan Z Miami to Rickenbacker Trail on the north end an►• —•. ; e� . r• and to the Commodore Trail on the west end of the park.Resilience design is a major 1i„ _ strategy throughout all the proposed interventions.From the salt resistant vegetation and �--- sensitive transition to the Native Forest Community on the North West area to the use of innovative permeable path technologies and solar lighting. Landscape improvements included new site furniture that integrates city wide preferred alternatives with natural stone sourced benches that recreate and celebrates the exiting y Silver Bluff formations of the site. ^ The proposed geometry of the baywalk was inspired by the curvilinear forms found at , ')."4111 . "I••••�j, ��t 1�• the breaking waves on the sandy beaches of Miami,softening the transition of the hard e:... sea wall to the water. Open unobstructed views out to the sea are maintained while 4 I shade is provided thought seating areas and around the open lawn event spaces. at A 'ice - :... : Cost:53,500,000 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. Miami,Florida Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(1/2004)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS qv. RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 8 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TFTLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Flagler Streetscapes PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(if applicable) Miami,Florida 2013-2014 2012-2014 23. PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Capital Improvements Program (305)416-1236 444 S.W.2nd Avenue,8th Floor Mr.Hector Badu Miami,Florida 33130 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,sizeand cost) eIt.. �►- 41.)C15/7°''.*'riiiiihb...7-".":.7 ' ' 7 1" ,' .'.'': : ,- ....1r *. _ ,flip -. Nrik. —, . . • : . { I 1 "IK '� ..._ a ,.�I A Is r,ft,,, •.r:J �. __` lot, . .. ,I '. il * ilfIll — ' - - 1 '-24*Rm. . .' ' - \14, , The project goal is to reconfigure the Flagler Street from NW 2nd Ave to Biscayne Blvd, to provide wider sidewalks, selective parallel parking/loading areas, grading/drainage improvements, and landscape and hardscape enhancements commensurate with a vibrant downtown commercial area. The goal for these improvements is to provide areas for outdoor cafes, together with unified furnishings, lighting and landscape to enhance the visitor experience of the area. Flagler's long historic significance has been taken into consideration in the planning and design of these improvements. Given that Flagler is the considered the City of Miami's"main street', many parties are involved in the planning and implementation of the project.The project is being managed by the City of Miami's Capital Improvements Division(CIP),working in conjunction with the Downtown Development Authority (DDA),specifically with the Flagler Street Steering Committee.Cost:$13,500,000 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Curtis+Rogers Design Studio, Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Inc. STANDARD FORM 330(112004)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC .. F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 9 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Samson Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2014-2015 3.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Sunny Isles Mrs.Elka Linton-Dorsett 305.792.1939 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size, and cost) One of the last remnant parks displaying the historic art-deco architecture in Sunny Isles,this oceanfront park in the heart of the city required a new 4. functional design sensitive to its historic elements and the natural ecology of the area. C+R designed a new playground,stage area,and concert lawn area to be woven into the existing fabric of the park. Sensitivity to ecological conditions were taken with careful lighting design around this sea turtle nesting site and protection and maintenance of the established dune vegetation.The park is scheduled to be completed in 2015. 0.: A ...442: , ss s p • �•si� 4 i _ dt F . fir, is 1 t N. 1 -N,„....:4,1`4" ;-.:j. s _' ,,moi, _� - <..�„s� ' , '� y r ! % 1 I 2 5. FIRMS ECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE a. Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. Miami,Florida Landscape Architect Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT NUMBER (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. 10 Complete one Section F for each project.) 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED Gibson Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) Miami,Florida 2010-2012 N/A 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER City of Miami Capital Improvements Program Mr.Carlos Vasquez (305)416-1206 444 SW 2nd Avenue,8th Floor Miami,Fl.33130 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT(Include scope,size,and cost) r Landscape architectural services for this design-build urban community park's redevelopment 4�' --vr . included a synthetic turf football field,covered accessible playground,picnic shelters,vita course • > .• ' trail,a splash park and a pool. The park was originally opened in 1980 and named for Pastor " •• `., Theodore Gibson,but had fallen into disrepair. The residents of the historic Overtown neighborhood i of Miami are very excited to have their park back and much improved.The bright colors pay homage ">s ,• 1 .., to the Bahamian ancestry of the founders of Overtown. w 7 At.... -} -f • �' .7— --.4"—. tilic?'.7:1111111 • . Ill .1 .„.,-• • . . - ,. r � r �. I ,Iliii ' '��,:i h�: f 33'Z r :446:3"..44' i. i ;. �y� A f , c t d,,, ,/,,.... l - r m i t � ,! . t r 1 Scope Landscape,Hardscape,Amenities and Irrigation Design Construction Documents&Construction Administration. Cost:S 9,794,667.00 25.FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT (1)FIRM NAME (2)FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3)ROLE '' Curtis+Rogers Design Studio,Inc. I Miami,Florida Landscape Architect STANDARD FORM 330(1r2ooa)PAGE 3 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC (-4 G. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN EXAMPLE PROJECTS 26.NAMES OF KEY 27.ROLE IN THIS 28.EXAMPLE PROJEC IS LIS FED-IN-SECTION F PERSONNEL (Fill in"Example Projects Key"section below before completing PNEL CONTRACT table. Place"X"under project key number for (From Section Glace Block E, (From SectionE, participation in same or similar role.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Aida M. Curtis Managing Principal X X X X X X X X X X Jennie Rogers Landscape Architect X X X Mariana Boldu Director of Innovation & X Resilience Design Ruben Colon Landscape Designer X X Jacob Lafever Landscape Designer X X 29. EXAMPLE PROJECTS KEY NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) NO. TITLE OF EXAMPLE PROJECT(FROM SECTION F) 1 North Shore Park 6 Garden of the Arts Park 2 Lummus Park 7 Alice Wainwright Park 3 Pinetree Park 8 Flagler Streetscapes 4 The Mildred Claude Pepper Bayfront Park Baywalk 9 Samson Park 5 Deering Canoe Drop 10 Gibson Park STANDARD FORM 330(6/2004)PAGE 4 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO,INC 7 H.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 29. PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE AGENCY. ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED: Firm Profile Curtis + Rogers Design Studio was formed with the purpose of providing quality Landscape Architecture/ Planning Services. The firm, founded in 1991 by Aida M. Curtis and Richard Rogers, represents over 60 years of Landscape Architectural experience. Commitment to producing quality projects and providing client satisfaction forms the foundation of our fine reputation. We design environments using a process that emphasizes creativity within the context of rational problem-solving.Cultural, economic, environmental,and social forces are strong determinants of design. Design Collaboration Our practice is founded on a collaborative approach which stresses interaction between clients, users, stakeholders and Curtis + Rogers professionals Design Expression Our inspiration for design expression grows from an appreciation for context, and an understanding of program. Context includes the understanding of the influences of a physical/environmental setting,the history and culture of an area, and from particular opportunities and constraints that grow from the program. Our expression is a direct result of trying to maximize the social benefits and at the same time minimizing the imposition of the man-made environment on the natural setting. We care deeply about building quality projects that last and serve those who entrust us to provide these services. Design Process We believe that creativity results from an interaction between motivated clients and professionals. The best designs result from an interactive process between artistic creativity and experienced judgment. Technical Capabilities We are committed in utilizing state of the art technology enabling us to serve our client and project needs efficiently and accurately. Curtis + Rogers has GIS, CADD, Photoshop/Sketchup, 3D visualization and is quickly moving to implement new BMI technology for Landscape Architects Technical Quality Control Curtis and Rogers Design Studio, Inc has a reputation for achieving high quality projects, through its concerted effort of producing design and documents that are delivered after a thorough review process.Curtis + Rogers,since inception, has relied on an independent quality control methodology. Curtis and Rogers has implemented a Technical Quality Control Manual, which provides each employee with a comprehensive system of checklists for every aspect of production. The responsible employee reviews the checklists and ensures that the deliverable complies with all items covered in the checklist. Once the deliverable is completed, it is passed to an independent reviewer, who once again will review the deliverable and ensure compliance with checklist and design and technical standards. The deliverable is redlined for corrections, returned to the responsible employee for incorporation of corrections prior to final delivery. Curtis + Rogers' quality control reviewers are the most experienced professionals of the firm including Gerald Marston a Fellow of the American Society of Landscape Architects, and a registered landscape architect for over 40 years,Aida Curtis,a registered landscape architect with over 30 years of experience. Having worked with numerous municipalities, and successfully implemented a variety of projects throughout South Florida is a testament to the quality of work effort that exemplifies the firm. In the 26 years of Curtis + Rogers existence,the firm has not been subject to any claims or lawsuits. Curtis + Rogers has, and is, continuing to influence the Miami landscape and skyline through such projects as: Garden of the Arts Park in Hialeah, Samson park in Sunny Isles, Royal Caribbean Innovation Center, 15th Street Plaza in Miami, Miami Flagler Streetscape, Downtown Coconut Grove Streetscape, US Federal Courthouse in Downtown Miami, countless parks and schools throughout the State. Recently Curtis t Rogers has completed the reconstruction of Gibson Park in Miami and the Juvenile Courthouse in Downtown Miami. Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 6,11, Sustainable Design Approach Curtis & Rogers is a leader in executing projects with an environmentally conscious/ sustainable approach. Our professionals were in the forefront of the LEED movement, we were responsible for the first LEED Gold School in Florida- Pine Jog Elementary in West Palm Beach, Florida, the first LEED Gold School in Miami-Dade County-Terra Environmental, First Platinum School in Florida - Galaxy Elementary in Boynton Beach, Florida. We were also responsible for developing a pilot project for the Sustainable Sites Initiative Program, which promotes reduction of water demand, filtering and reducing stormwater runoff, providing wildlife habitat, reducing energy consumption, improving air quality, improving human health and increasing outdoor recreation opportunities. The US Federal Office Building in Miramar, Florida was designed to recreate "old Florida" conditions and demonstrate that high quality buildings can exist within natural habitats by incorporating the wetlands throughout the project as well as into interior and exterior courtyards. We have been involved in projects which convert under-utilized infrastructure into beautiful park spaces such as the Award-Winning Garden of the Arts Park in Hialeah, Florida; create natural habitats for wildlife and pollinators such as our Naturalized Roadway project at the 826 interchanges for FDOT, and our Miami-Dade Solar Pollinator Garden; solve urban planting problems through use of innovative technology as in our Coconut Grove Streetscape project and our Flagler Street Reconstruction project for the City of Miami. We are aware that our environmental conditions are changing and we in South Florida are facing difficult challenges due to Sea Level Rise and Climate Change; as such we continue to be on the forefront of resilient design by providing adaptation strategies for our most recent projects 79th Street- Miami and the Miami Marine Stadium. We strongly believe that as "Stewards of the Land" it is our responsibility and duty to work to mitigate environmental damage cause by rapid growth of economic activity, depletion of natural resources and damages to our ecosystem and loss of biodiversity.We practice a sustainable approach to design and business daily. Registered Landscape Architects Curtis + Rogers has six Licensed Registered Landscape Architects LEED Accredited Professionals Curtis + Rogers has three LEED Accredited Professionals Affiliations Curtis + Rogers is a member of The U.S.Green Building Council (USGBC.) Certified Arborist Curtis + Rogers has three ISA Certified Arborist Landscape Inspectors Curtis + Rogers has three Florida Landscape Inspector AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. 31.SIGNATURE 32.DATE: 04/24/2018 33.NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER: Aida M. Curtis, President STANDARD FORM 330(812004)PAGE 6 Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS (1;4 RFQ 2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC 1.SOLICITATION NUMBER(If any) ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS RFQ 2018-141-ND PART II—GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS (If a firm has branch offices, complete for each specific branch office seeking work) 2a FIRM(OR BRANCH OFFICE)NAME 3 YEAR ESTABLISHED 4 DUNS NUMBER Curtis + Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 1991 829384650 2b STREET 7520 S. Red Road, Suite M 5.OWNERSHIP e TYPE 2c.CITY 2d.STATE 2e.ZIP CODE Corporation South Miami FL 33143 b SMALL BUSINESS STATUS Ba POINT OF CONTACT NAME AND TITLE Active Aida M. Curtis, President 7 NAME OF FIRM(N block 2a is a branch orrice! 6b.TELEPHONE NUMBER 8c.E-MAIL ADDRESS 305 442 1774 aida©curtisrogers.com 8a.FORMER FIRM NAME(S)(Many) 8b.YR.ESTABLISHED 8c.DUNS NUMBER 9.EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE 10.PROFILE OF FIRM'S EXPERIENCE AND ANNUAL AVERAGE REVENUE FOR LAST 5 YEARS a.Function c No. c.Revenue Index Codea.Prose b.Discipline Code b.Experience Number (1)FIRM (2)BRANCH (see below) 02 Administrative 2 All Auditoriums&Theater 1 06 Architect 6 C08 Churches;Chapels 1 08 CADD Technician 1 H11 Housing 2 48 Project Manager 2 H09 Hospitals&Medical Facilities 1 J01 Judicial&Courtroom Facilities 1 L04 Libraries;Museums;Galleries 1 R04 Recreation Facilities(Park,Marinas) 2 A06 Airports 1 D04 Design Builds 1 106 Irrigation 1 001 Office Building 1 T03 Transportation 1 H07 Highways;Streets;Parking Lots 1 C05 Child Care/Development Facilities 2 Total 11 11.ANNUAL AVERAGE PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVENUE INDEX NUMBER SERVICES REVENUES OF FIRM FOR LAST 3 YEARS 1. Less than$100,000 6. $2 million to less than$5 million (insert revenue index number shown at right) 2. $100,000 to less than$250,000 7. $5 million to less than$10 million a.Federal Work 1 3. $250,000 to less than$500,000 8. $10 million to less than$25 million b.Non-Federal Work 5 4. $500,000 to less than$1 million 9. $25 million to less than$50 million c.Total Work 5 5. $1 million to less than$2 million 10. $50 million or greater 12.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The foregoing is a statement of facts. a SIGNATURE b.DATE i (_^jL,{' (:II)_L. J-::_;)" 04/24/2018 AND c NAME ATITLE ` Aida M. Curtis, President Miami Beach CURTIS + ROGERS RFQ2018-141-ND DESIGN STUDIO, INC qv. CURTIS + ROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC 7520 S. RED ROAD, SUITE M SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33143 WWW.CURTISROGERS.COM 305 442 1 774