Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agreement with Allan T Shulman Architect PA
c2017— 30D/F AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ALLAN T SHULMAN ARCHITECT PA FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES (PROJECT) PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-155-KB RESOLUTION NO. 2017-30018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 3 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 7 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 12 ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 13 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 14 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 14 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 15 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 16 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 16 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 17 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 18 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 19 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 20 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ' 20 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE 21 ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 21 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A—SCOPE OF SERVICES 25 SCHEDULE A- 1 -CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER(ADDITIONAL SERVICES) 26 SCHEDULE B-COMPENSATION 27 SCHEDULE C— HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE 28 SCHEDULE D -CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 29 SCHEDULE E- PROJECT SCHEDULE 30 SCHEDULE F-APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 31 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A—Resolution, Commission Item, Commission Memorandum 302 ATTACHMENT B- RFQ 40 ATTACHMENT C—Consultant's Response to the RFQ 41 2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND ALLAN T SHULMAN ARCHITECT PA FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES This Agreement made and entered into this S'� day of Q 6 ruc v v , 201$(Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corpora{ion existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and Allan T Schulman Architect PA., a FLORIDA corporation having its principal office at 100 NE 38 Street, Space 2, Miami, FL. 33137 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the RFQ No. 2017-155-KB (the "RFQ") was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act; and WHEREAS, on September 25,2017,the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2017- 30018, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with Allan T Schulman Architect PA., and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services" shall mean those services, in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order, 3 which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services"shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order set forth in Schedule A hereto. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to 'City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The"City Manager" shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the"Consultant"shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the design professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through Subconsultants acceptable to the City) all architectural, design and engineering services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order and will serve as the "architect of record" and/or "engineer of record" for the Project. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The following Subconsultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: 4 (Schedule "F") CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant(in substantial form as in Schedule A-1 attached hereto), that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City(as specified below)and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Project, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved by the City Commission if they exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Even for Contract Amendments of fifty thousand dollars($50,000.00)or less (or other such threshold contract amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance), the City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents"shall mean this Agreement(together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), the Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a Project, and the documents prepared by Consultant in accordance with the requirements stipulated in such Consultant Service Order. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto),the Request for Qualifications(RFQ), Design Criteria Package (if any). CONTRACTOR: "Contractor" shall mean the individual or individuals, firm, company, corporation,joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN DOCUMENTS: "Design Documents" means all design guidelines and all other documents prepared by the Consultant pursuant to any Consultant Service Order issued by the City under this Agreement. FORCE MAJEURE: "Force Majeure" shall mean any delay occasioned by superior or irresistible force occasioned by violence in nature without the interference of human agency such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, loss caused by fire and other similar unavoidable casualties; or other causes beyond the City's or Consultant's control that are not due to any act, omission or negligence of either City or Consultant and, which have, or may be reasonably expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Project, or on the rights and obligations of City or Consultant under this Agreement and which, by the exercise of due diligence, such parties shall not have been able to avoid; provided, however, that inclement weather(except as noted above), the acts or omissions of Subconsultants, the Contractor and its sub-contractors, market conditions, labor conditions, construction industry price trends, and similar matters which normally impact on the construction process shall not be considered a Force Majeure. If the Consultant is delayed in performing any obligation under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure, the Consultant shall request a time extension from the Project Administrator within five (5) business days of said Force Majeure. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual 5 agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. PROJECT: N/A. The Project, for purposes of this Agreement, shall consist of the scope of services requested by the City pursuant to the Consultant Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The "Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services Schedule A-1 — Consultant Service Order Schedule B— Consultant Compensation Schedule C— Hourly Billing Rate Schedule Schedule D — Construction Cost Budget Schedule E— Project Schedule Schedule F - Approved Subconsultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES: "Scope of Services"shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement. SUBCONSULTANT: Any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any architectural, design, engineering or similar professional services with respect to the Project. Any Subconsultant that may perform services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed design professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the Subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional design services in connection with the Project. The following Subconsultants are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project: (Schedule "F") WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code 6 changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total completion, construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, as more particularly described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time, and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised similarly-situated professionals performing similar services in the design or planning of comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks, including planning, design, bidding/award, preparation of a DCP, studies, construction administration, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Scope of Services; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including,without limitation, any negligent design errors or omissions. Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any Subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Design Documents and Consultant's Work, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Design Documents and Consultant's Work. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any Subconsultant) of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by 7 any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. With respect to the performance of Services by Subconsultants,the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such services, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's services. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that the parties will perform as expeditiously under this contract as is required by the applicable standard of care, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 3 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project(as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Scope of Services. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the completion time for the Scope of Services, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment(i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request(and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment(i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request(and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 8 2.8 Consultant shall use best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Contractor, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order(including the services performed by Subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consulting with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City to the extent caused by the Consultant's deficient Services, breaches of this Agreement, or negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, contractors, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards for design or construction of comparable projects if applicable, or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing, including, without limitation (and where applicable), via a set of marked-up drawings and specifications. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely" shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 9 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project( including, without limitation, any Subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require.Subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order) which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator,said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN 10 ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM, ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE, THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by Subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the Subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the Subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any Subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of Subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its Subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by Subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, within the standard of care, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the Subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and Subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the Subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a Subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the Subconsultant. Payment of Subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. 11 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion, the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its Subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City, acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 Except where otherwise expressly noted in the Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any amendments or modifications to this Agreement. 3.6.2 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 12 3.6.3 The City Commission shall approve or consider all Contract Amendments that exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Procurement Ordinance, as amended). 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements) and of any Subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide, and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 The City Manager may approve Contract Amendments which do not exceed the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) (or other such amount as may be specified by the City of Miami Beach Purchasing Ordinance, as amended); provided that no such amendments increase any of the budgets established by this Agreement. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion,form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 13 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B"hereto),with a"Not to Exceed"amount; Reimbursable Expenses(if any)with a"Not to Exceed" amount; the amended Construction Cost Budget(if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule(if applicable). "Not to Exceed"shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator.The"Not to Exceed"amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.2. Unforeseen Conditions. Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of the Consultant Service Order(excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3. [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.4 Expert Witness: Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony, preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name, that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 [Intentionally Omitted] 5.2.6. Models: Preparing professional perspectives, models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 14 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses include preapproved travel costs, in accordance with the City's Travel Reimbursement Policy. 6.2 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project, provided such expenses are authorized in advance by the City in a Consultant Service Order. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified herein, belongs to, and shall be controlled by the City(i.e. unused portions will be retained by the City and shall not be paid to Consultant). Only approved travel-related expenses authorized by a Consultant Service Order will be reimbursed to the Consultant, in an amount not-to-exceed the agreed-upon amount reflected on the corresponding Consultant Service Order, and in accordance with City-wide Procedure OD. 20.01 (Travel on City Business), as may be updated by the City from time to time ("Reimbursable Expenses"). Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the corresponding Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material required to support the amount invoiced, and as requested by the corresponding Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Only actual amounts incurred and paid (requiring proof of payment) by the Consultant shall be invoiced, without any markups and/or additions. ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). If the City objects to any invoice submitted by Consultant, City shall so advise Consultant in writing giving reasons therefor within fourteen (14) days following City's receipt of such notice. No mark-up shall be allowed on Subconsultants or subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall,for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly billing rates set forth in Schedule "C," attached hereto. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto, up to the "Not to Exceed" Reimbursable allowance amount set forth in Schedule B or in the applicable Consultant Service Order. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be 15 included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City Manager, at his sole discretion, may consider an adjustment to the hourly rates set forth in Schedule C. Any such adjustments, if any, shall be based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982-84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, provided, however, that in no event shall any annual increase exceed three percent (3%). In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Contractor. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis. Invoices shall identify the nature and extent of the work performed; the total hours of work performed by employee category; and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith. In the event Subconsultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s) or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work(by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records(whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3) years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its Subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the 16 property of the City, but only to the extent the City has paid for that portion of the Work performed by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order, within thirty (30) days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However, the City shall grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release, or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Notwithstanding any other terms in or applicable to this Agreement, subject to City's prior approval which shall not be reasonably withheld, the Consultant shall hereby retain an irrevocable, worldwide, nonexclusive license to reuse the documents. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project(or both),the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any material provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty(30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 17 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant(including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). In the event of Termination of Consultant only, the City acknowledges that the use of any incomplete or partial material prepared by Consultant shall be utilized by the City at the City's risk. The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience,without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date(as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however,that the City shall first be granted a thirty(30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination(whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 At all times during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain the following required insurance coverage in full force and effect.The Consultant shall not commence any work until satisfactory proof of all required insurance coverage has been furnished to the Project Administrator: 18 (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the State of Florida. (b) Commercial General Liability on a comprehensive basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used in connection with the work, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $2,000,000 with the deductible per claim. Consultant shall notify the Project Administrator, in writing, within thirty (30) days of any claims filed or made against its Professional Liability policy. 11.2 Except for Professional Liability,Workers Compensation, and Employer's Liability, the City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 11.3 The Consultant must give the Project Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation, substantial modifications, or nonrenewal of any required insurance coverage. All certificates and endorsements shall contain this requirement. 11.4 The insurance must be furnished by an insurance company rated A:V or better, or its equivalent, according to Bests' Guide Rating Book, and by insurance companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and countersigned by the company's Florida resident agent. 11.5 Consultant shall provide the Project Administrator with a certificate of insurance of all required insurance policies. The City reserves the right to require a certified copy of such policies, upon written request to Consultant. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless (but not defend) the City, and its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys'fees, to . the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs,judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers and employees as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or 19 concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Contractor, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its Subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes or design changes categorized by the City as caused by a negligent error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Contract Documents that were prepared by the Consultant, if such work was applicable to, or performed by, the Consultant, will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for negligent errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the negligent errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's negligent errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the negligent error, omission, or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors, omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager or the City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by City to the Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to the total amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the amount of compensation/fees due to Consultant for all Services under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s) actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 20 Likewise, the parties agree that, notwithstanding any other term to the contrary and to the fullest extent permitted by law, the City and Consultant each waive any right to consequential, indirect and special damages and agree that the Consultant's total liability in the aggregate, under or in connection with this Agreement, to the city or anyone claiming by, through, or under the City, where in contract or tort, negligence, breach or otherwise shall not exceed: (1) the total compensation received by Consultant for its services performed under this Agreement, and (2) the amount of the liability insurance policy limits , as provided in Article II of this Agreement. SUBJECT TO CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 558.0035, FLORIDA STATUTES,A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF CONSULTANT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE OCCURRING WITHIN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Susy Torriente, Assistant City Manager All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: Allan T. Shulman Architect PA 100 NE 38 Street Space 2 Miami, FL. 33137 Attn: Rebecca Stanier-Shulman Email Address: Rebecca@shulman-design.com All notices mailed to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested. ARTICLE 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 VENUE: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL • LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 21 16.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 16.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act(Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 16.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover)the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 16.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 16.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 16.5.2 Project Documents. In accordance with Section 119.07(3)(ee), Florida Statutes, entitled "Inspection, Examination, and Duplication of Records; Exemptions," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats, are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or contractor who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 16.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 16.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited 22 to, each employee of Consultant and Subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 16.5.2.2 The Consultantand its Subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 16.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 16.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 16.6 [Intentionally Omitted] 16.7 ASSIGNMENT: The Consultant shall not assign, transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person, firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by Subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 16.8 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City(through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 16.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 16.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 16.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the Project. 16.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 16.10.3 No acceptance, order, payment, or certificate of or by the City, or its 23 employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 16.11 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by the parties. hereto, as of the date first written above. Attest ���...������ ITY OF ya +_ = CH: • 0\1\I E3,11 t 215j, ........... CITY CL RK * Irl •, �`� Attest ORp ORA'j 4ANN Il SHULMAN ARCHITECT PA AP e19ctaaLcgf # h.(,)/(if Si nature/Set'ary "Sign ture e President Print Name Print Name APPROVED AS FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION • City Attorney ape Date 24 SCHEDULE A—SCOPE OF SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES The Consultant shall provide professional services for historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines pursuant to the Agreement. Each firm awarded a contract hereby agrees to be placed on a list of professionals that will provide architectural and engineering consultant services where the City may call upon them to perform professional services for certain City projects, (the Project or Projects), as assigned by the City, in its sole discretion and judgment. As the need for service arises, firms will be contacted to provide the necessary professional services according to the negotiated scope of work and cost. Professional services will be quoted as a not to exceed or lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete a project and in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in Schedule "C" of this Agreement. The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order; the Consultant shall sign it and return it to the City for execution by the City Manager or his/her designee. Proposer team shall provide the following professional services for resiliency and adaptation guidelines, but not limited to: • renovation of existing buildings in coastal or low lying areas, including, but not limited to, additions, elevating existing structures and yards and repurposing existing floors • ability to use cutting edge and advanced technologies in the preservation and adaptation of historic buildings and structures in low lying area • ability to create and advance design guidelines and regulations, including corresponding illustrations • an understanding of the Southeast Florida landscape, geology, topography and vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise • Project Cost Estimator 25 SCHEDULE A-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. _ for Consulting Services. TO: VENDOR PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the Agreement between the City and Consultant for Architectural and Engineering Services for Historic District Resiliency and Adaptation Guidelines (RFQ 2017-155-KB), Consultant shall provide the following Services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date 26 SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Services * $X)000000( Design Services* $)0X)OOCXX Reimbursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXX)( Note*: These services will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note***: The Reimbursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in writing, in advance, by the Project Administrator. Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 27 SCHEDULE C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE 13E0,2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES CATEGORIES HOURLY RATES Architecture;Urban Design;Historic Preservation Principal-in-Charge $325.00 Project Director $225.00 Project Manager $180.00 Project Architect $180.00 Designer $125.00 Draftsperson $90.00 Structural/Coastal/Civil/Geotech Eng;Sustainability;Hydrology/Geologist;Project Cost Estimating Senior Engineers $150.00 Engineers $125.00 BIM Managers $180.00 Senior BIM Technicians $150.00 BIM Technicians $120.00 Landscape Architecture;Resiliency Planning Principal $225.00 Project Manager $180.00 Landscape Architect $140.00 Jr.Landscape Architect $110.00 Structural Engineering/Local Principal Professional Engineer $200.00 Engineer $150.00 Field Technician $75.00 CADD $75.00 Coastal/Civil/Geoteni cal Engineering/Local Principal $200.00 Project Manager $140.00 Senior Engineer/Architect $138.00 Engineer/Architect/Scientist $116.00 Designer/Assistant Project Manager $95.00 CAD/Engineering Technician $63.00 Building Elevation/Relocation Principal $185.00 Certified Flood Plain Manager/Home Elevation Expert $175.00 Home Elevation Expert/Field $135.00. Home Elevation Estimator $125.00 Field Inspector $85.00 28 SCHEDULE D CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET 29 SCHEDULE E PROJECT SCHEDULE 30 SCHEDULE F APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 1) DLANDSTUDIO Landscape Architecture and Water 2) SJ Hauck House Movers 3) ARUP 4) YHCE Structural Engineering 5) Coastal Systems international 31 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 32 RESOLUTION NO, 20174801$ A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF !MIAMI°BEACH".IFLORIDAi ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION! O THE 'CITY MANAGER; PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR. QUALIFICATIONS .(RFCL) iNck, :20174$5-HEI, FOR .ARrilrrtmoRAL AN ENGINEERING SERVICES, FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION :GUIDELINES; . AUTHORIZING THE. ADMINISTRATION! TO ENTER INTO NEGunimiofts witH. ALLAN T. SHULMAN ARcHrrecr, AS THE TOP •RA.NRED PROPOSER, TO SERVE AS THE CiTrS PRIME/LAD CONSULTA.NT: TORII-1ER, ESTABLISHING A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASK$ RELATING TO. ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, MD WITH PtespecT TO THE PRE,QUALIVIED CONSULTANT POOL, AUTHORIZING.THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BENDER-8i ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A.-.$ AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER.; URBAN ROBOT, LLC AS THE THIRD'RANKEDf PROPOSER;AND RJ HEFsEmeorrLe ARCHITECTS,P.A.,„ AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO !EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF suooesaFuL NEGOTIATIONS EY THE ADMINISTRATION. w EREA nApriI 28 2017 eta City Cornimissicfm awn),‘ed the ileetanta of Request for aufplificOlon5(RFQ)r . 2017-155.KB for Arthileortinererid a4ineering Services for Flintorio D7af,rict Reallianty and Adaptat.bn end WHEREAS, Request"for Oveliiieetions Nti:2017-1554;11 (thol3PCIP) wee released era' April 28,2017;end! WHEREA$,.entarypralimposal mooting was W.d. on May$5,2017;end WIlKEAS,'on ,kfne 19, 2017. the City recolvod a. total of proposals frolti Allen T. Shutin Architect PA; AECOM Technicat Sew:ices, ina.; Bender & Associates Araiitaola; RA„, Architects;PA, UrArersIty of Miami;ditd Urban Robot,-LW.;and WHEREASprepaSDISfr AOM Technical Servicas!„ !Inc, and !the Orilt.‘ernity 61 Miami kivtirit..d4arried non-responsive tor failure to meet the;ffittifnUrn requIrerriente 64 tho RFP, we not further evaluated;and „ WHEREAS, the Cornraittpo dinvoned ott 1 2017 to reVieW OSA some the farmining.proponaln;and WHEREAS, t Ctimiyfle vies 00/1ded en ovenfieW Of the project, Information,relative lotto GUIs Cone or Silence,Ordinanca and the,'Goveamiliont.Sunsiline Levi,.general Werntatlen on the swipe of as end.a copy ith pmpasal; end WriEfiEAs, the Cemmittogr8 rat*Ing vow IIcw Alan 11 SheIrron Archlteot. PA, an the. 'top ranked .pmposer; and With respect to the pool ct° pro.4wilfied' MTIELIKants 'fOr Ep?tdkd1,:i3E.,*sfrelrotng. enchitecturaI and ervineoring set-Vices,The Oorynnittee*mkt mnierttied .15 ender& Msoolate ,Architects, P.A„ es:the end ranked gropeteC Urban Robet, Lte.. the third taitwatt prOpecioG R.J.Helsel-bottle Arthiteetb%!P.A., es thefoth.ranked ipirepos6c 33 WHEREAS, atter rayievingi the qualikations dh firm,'arid h71.1-ving ,onsidaned the comelier% Cernattee'e crornrhents and ragiling.F.,,,the City tletraver has frezeiTirriended that Ow Mr arid tit•tie City corriretalgon authorize the Adtriittstration to enter tato negotiallons„Voith • Allen I, ,Shulntari ,Archittot,, PA ts t lop ranked proOqser„ to SONO as the Ft-rhea:tad Consultant;,anO, viith repeat to the!pool of pr-,-qUalified otnsulttilts'rot gpKific teaks rolatiriolo alshileotural tnderitinearing tem.ti•"o,PA,, authorize nagorattions with Ettgef a •,Aaeociates, Anlif:tect% RA., :es. the. socond !ranked proper;; Urban, .Robot, 1LLQ„'as the third ife,1*.ed propeeer;.et,d,RJ Hdisenboille.ANbiteta,PA es'ihis'feurlh ranted prOposet Nog T.HERE:PORE. pe: IT DULY_ RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR N4,0i .ciry CorntSWON Or- THE CITY OF WAN [3[..EACH FLORIDA; 'that the Mayor Commiss'orh•hereby atmliot the Tat-,,-4.;i,..Mrfieodatbil of tl'Ai'CRY folatiogtfl pertalrilog to the•ranklno of Pcitilostis,, hese to Requeg ft Qualtricallans (RFQ) 14p. 20t1 T1 5$I 'fur OT,thiterlaral and Enolneettnti SerVidits for iiori Dlatnd REsilitlre4 and Adaptation'alideiiil,l',4:;13,otficitze the Adrilinit4trativil 1 enter(Ate'negotietiom with Allan T,. 8iriutTnen Arthiloot, 12A„, .a.% the top ranked piltwer, to tterife as the PrinletLeed CprtsulLthlit;father eaablith A pool of Ott-1140-Culed wheultehts For specific taaike relating to WthilattUali ati$angin eeriag seigeos,and wi4r4 respect to the pre.qualif: bormilent peer ;Iiktlherize-alp 01.drnin1t1ration to Ot1W into inspoEatiOnS^w1th Honder & A:ago:tilde's Po.ohlte0„„e, P A. as thmorid'farilied propoaer; Urban Robot, 01.C., sS 00 1.1*,difm- ed prq i-paer!. odRJr HeisenbottleArOa*, P.A„ as Me•froolh ranked prcpc:sor, prod further ,authorize LI* Mayor and, City Clark to okewts agreements with'oa.oh of the foregoing)mmere upon POtICIUSiOn Of StiMaSSIOI [negotiations by the Administration, . :PASSED AND ADOPTED Inis 457 da li'tl' . .. ,... : :, .;„„z.,• iphwt3 4,..41/,:' Au 1,/,' ..,. „., . . • ....• . . ; Re --,,Grarte- 'ally'..:,17. .,',•. *.75:45,,q74:.:41- . ...., ... , . ,, ' '''' 2 ) •P: . 1444--- rePURCM4/Pag-t161:412=ei.w. . „ . 43), mi-,7:::gT1 sgrktnasik'1,Watirial LIWY.V.:074-4X.rilnisaaN Mcgrollit3W,Awantil,M,24.1.TzL:Rprik:fijNii 50- .'i...,417i dadVAirx F V,., CI , . ''e,4,:',„ 1/4.%1,...., ,I•91 q - '',:r,_.14-,,, ..,,,!-;"-,..:•,?,.'",,,'''v.,', '•-llti)A774*t... '-"Li'N .:1--'-4! krkrzrz -..,.1:,,,,,:,,,,,,),-- IVPROVIED-AsS,V FORM&LANGUARte FoR AION - '3( j f (Aigiir I .Ilik P4/177'' ,.. 1 .,.,,.?t4,,T,.O,,., -..,,,.,.,.,t.,,,,,,„•7._ , :-'.. - ,i : 1V . 44v 34 rrUr R7 A A., Hts.A.H1 comitifiStION MEMORANIDUM TO: Harthabla MarLor.and the C ly Ceriniation FROM 4.1,ranly L.Iobrafes, City,Mazi*r DAT2-. FioIVIOnc* 13,,2317 `all.BJEcn A RESOLUTION. OF THE IfilnifOR AND ,CITY COMMISSION OF THE lorry OF rIMBEACH, FLORIDA ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, pURSUANT T.0 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO, ,2017-. 1.55-.KB, FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC tit-STRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTONEGOTIATIONS WITH ALLAN T, SHULMAN ARCHITECT, RA, AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER, TO :SERVE .AS THE CITY S PRIMELEAEI: CONSULTANT,- FURTHER, ESTABLISHING A POOL OF PRE;CILIALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO ARCHITECTURL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, AND WITH RESPECT TO. THE ORE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANT POOL, IWTHORIZING TKE. ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER Irs'fT0 NEGOT6VIONS2 WITH ELENEGER & ASSOCIATES .ARCHITECTS;, A. AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; URBAN ROBOT, LIG, AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPO,SeR AND R,J, liElSENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, PA AS THE FOURTH •RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZINO THE MAYOR AM) CITY CLERK TO 1b;,, - LJTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH ,OR THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON ,CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS EY THemANISTRATKA giEri0111*Iffialati Adept the Ruftn.. ANALYSIS The Chyt Miwal Soat4 Is sealfgv ritimpp buiddinEis and.regulabbnafor Li rncIicr, nitlaing •andktr rosxavosIng of iatrucitirilt4in lowlying 4-iitip ci#0170,14r-gi vulnembi.p tc cingaIng and Inawsing WA flooding, as w,iall'asihe !cog brrc avedlo-Of?RV layel rise. SwirOally,The Oki thirc iinUilldfrAiMinary law of Prigasatanall GNU and SINOtural •Enoltieers At°,..111 &patience in "wastaf4.iiraafiro and IT016.logy, and PlannerWth. 'expertise In Hteilt Prdsontalion, tirStYtTI8=thin:am thereof. ThSOSITo.rsi thO City sought propoS945 *flings 1p provide iprefa!ssional serolm for OsLaic disteldt ratiliancy daplatice 'Videlines Ire of reimallon or e.)$,W4 In coastal hisIdAd inOluding, but riot Ilrelted te„ 4.10m, eevaling existing stmotimaii,.:i'4 yards aid recAirgeaing agattq ffeem, TIva.aeteciwt firm'shag use,cutting ete and othkanwd tectirralogioshi the malign rd adaptation of 1-4torle 41(t4;:.and slnicluras in low tying areas,.Ad.,llierailly thD Inn will be.,able mate and advance de ' twidditnes anti tagnialions„ including dartasponding iLasgy, -'07e4 .6irin should tavou'an otederaanftc Ih Southeast Flanda 35 geblogy,t4-ipogr3phy end vulnerabiliti to climate change and tealevel rise: RFO PROCESS' On Ad l 20,2011,jibe City Coratit 14:00-aved the iaeuanr* of Ret:1"QT.Cluolifteak.crie (RF ) No 20f74554CEI tor ktOnitee..heref and EiViii1iFig SI oF,,:e iter- Hie;torio Distrirg• .Rillency arid AdaVatiOn Guicleant , ?p1 2q,.2„017,.the:RFQ wee ilest!.._„ted iNvolunWsi,•pro,,, : ol oDntero&c, piovide linfem4o1 ki prcpcsetre,,eubrothing ness€1 •w ticild. on KW 15" 2111I. RF reaPortEts wrsee: Jiia, and }received on Jur 19; 20717,The,City received a totalof.15 000-A@ISfrtm ilia fullewinn :firmet.Alan T ,e-,trOhlteot,„ PA, AECOM TotthrilW ices,, hc perider $0,- tes Agrlohilacte, RA R JFlelsenbettle Airdittlede P Phivereity DI Mrr 110336 Robot LLO,The proPts from AEGoro Technic-at:Serviceei, and i Univtirr-.1ty of Milt1 we:cleerned non,reeerishl'e fOr'failure to rmot-:the nitnitrkirn re:Niro-661-4 of-the RFP Ord wire 'net*Allier emlirated.' On June i2tH7 the Oily Manager eptehted the Evatuatidi cont6igee %la. LTC# 017,. The Evaluatiwi Cotreittoe O•otivenied chi jlEty•42,2017; ttel ,oenetder proposals re6e4ved.:The Committee Weafj earnprised of- Deborah Tath„EiEl Chief of •Filatorlo Preservation,. Planning :and Zoning • coottivrit; Regalia rdaderi Chid/‘of CommnLyrrfojild'a::Stretairloblft Planning and Zoriim topatirtiartt Jams. Murphy, .Chief of "salon Planning, Flaming ar-.4 ,Zaift• oparVnall: trd AlgatOlro'Garavito,-Senior Prr, Planning end ZotIng DeportMerit, The'CorrWitiatii w prec,,kkd ir vairview:c4-the'ploject, it.fornitian relatb,a, to the C.4ty7s. Cone o I•tilerm Ordinance .and Gooarnmt Sunthn Law- The Ccinrritfee was also brovi6ad nth general hforliotIon en The soc4,•.0•‘-', • Oftie:1Ni*, Ethd a. copy OF each preTictsef,The Corral** Vir.m Instrud0 to seem arid rank,oath Proposal pitrur o tha ti.9.7atiLroarl criteria In.•the RFO:.The evoluotkin precoss.tOgUltad in the tanking cif propoeene in.dieatbdito-541.90-vnerit et,:tri the following order: 1.,ManT..Shut:won Ardhiteet,PA 2. Berifer Aettittedti,,PA . Urban Robot, LIC 4 R.J.,1401.4eanbokitelirchftecte,PA , A airrthery feeidh•top-ranluedifin'n WO; •4T Shull Arthitectr,pA deirkg 'Ube iffritrnetie0 provided by the '17rirn, kku'l Oh ii Arthitett PA is,11.1t4.1ety 4-krjtfied isnatilipcturelty,and from Urban 4F4Ign and preservatid-rt Orsperlitite;'with e20 9188rtof operfeoce.. :Sful6a •IK6' the fir:m.414e been kiVelved in the OvOltition of the Cty nga.ging rn .einipet eery apeot of deitNlepiterit and radevelopiTent of the hisiO*.-distriats isho,Gity:Of&tiara Beethi, The Min has.done peciectl -ac4cies 1h spectrum frda Qareiti historic preweatioth ki ithiphim to additions ORO !hbitotiz properties;,into NAableetintezr*Imrytievaloproarite. Bewt0a Amaites mliiited5;RA, AMerding to ttte itttrriie1io6 be-mided by. the firrrer1drAL'S.: tiCiattE Aothildab3 %vas estabt .had Efl 1975 Iii 'F*gataffi.Altana, andfelocatpd to Key W6%t, Florida in 1R8.5.With atimost ..ip ya of the,firm has Ittaan rwilagniwaacOPert in lha fiald LcsacPresentatb'n,, ProducLag prctiedei'thrcii..J.ghOut. the State or Florida, Artzu.'ma!, Mont , Sault, cazdiro, ad Washington„ Their ekr,ierlettoo Fricludes wortting on historic:StrUeltireethat,ere on the Weber, in twl$(1%areas with frequent floodin Emile,On SOMittO ardhat&1titafSitet and In iFFImAz .Ar UftvIrt Robot,ILO „ &owl:0g•tb the inibritatio praorkdby elm Urban:R.Q1304,.. LJLC ull senfte!boutique desi."gn 'firm lased in Mfard BC12* tl*Ializin9 In ei. .rettiteolyra,,Mierlor,desfsnt, londseopo atr.hileeture arid !_titlbrt pia nnirig„The fairri‘wc*s td dewtop. ITnAtildisqlplinary approach all pro*ta. Lift.abou k 36 ..Unique vision ur'id' eat ! p arie tai. rr�aryn�ful, € parkrie,.pnd r' !Finally,tie tern. r flip ars its'I ,s.!di rae design.i ;l ours-d to bring about singular rierrativ That are ird tie!ronc ipt end il .t d o leach prajacL l�Ardlitacts,, I . ding to the inforriathb Prov3ried by the&in , H r ti 1 , PA wee-founded in lf.i,87 and fa an.ar tleciure,, p.l ` i ;I kar desk .and historit proi.-.4elyetien firm le&led in`Corsi • ablee., Fl= da.Th firm halt designed,.igned,. , ii i l t, renovated theater, auditorium;nto.r ipel t� . ric h+ 'commercial.bi_.t'r`g, h i lllity spam; evraortt ray', trntddle.and high chaoi ,. rll ice` i rA�.;,y' t ilraing ; peblic rraegrkgvenue , adri ini5tm1ion 1b4.1Otrigs, teal-amt. ° outdoor •spa end Oiec `f oiliti aver the . he.fi prcc ided ll .,arohiteaturalleogineerin0 Orvittiki to r Give e- _:` ipel OIienia in ling the City of Miami, I? i.Da aunt . City of i .r n„iateolt, Cfty of tour Glum -and / " Mt?r 8pri . Flr i `,- fire e.well!loom r hi c.restoration E of •th its , r=ea"s Oitioat r : p 3i+ ieit okg. 'LL,l �; After r l al to and resift of the ?aluation , I rr prr rr t ' Moioreir ani !pp we' .t resilu a but , n9E . drr ri traction i ante' Into ane liati_on 'vMh Allam. r!Shulman„�riiitact, aathe topad and Pafrna CQn uli?nt.T rF . pit l rw articill by the EValual :n , Allen T. Shulman Arehlect,, PA t .. rte; i : ity` rid, ° , '(cc il�e�, raquir d :aar� . .Ao ordingto, tri firm received Lira u turanktir,r 'theE'a rsa it n n-. -, e.. The a _4rrf . p .afd boa projeoia Mi rti l9 h worI g h _ Raabe!des ,, noriprofita and'p . : tcia= of stakeholders,. m ilikill $,; I recontniDnd the.f011omAng three ),_irrr-, mad en the CiWe .a-r.alr..ipated needs end potential.volumework, be ttpproved petliiste In Ike pool Of pre-qualified ult r a, c a itlnulrr Pe*. purgisent toSootion 287 Florida Stetetea Po iPf5-:5LIP9 that the needs ter arcftto ur rl and n r fa a lou I �.:11-91.31 frail quelit d to pentort the rk: 801162r & i it. a r � a ..P: ,, ea the seoond r enld pro !Urban Robot, LLD, es. EN) third retell props and RA. :H sent , okToilitecio, F:r , o3F the fourth. ran 1;.*,Propeedr FtOr the 1 ol kr ual'r r r u1 rte. 171t105”,+,", Id � 1 that -i -mal t Perk L auih ri :d.t r ' r e 1.0111 r dust +n of stiCeefe.t negeligittensthe, rr t-ii' t :�,, %it the :rirr .ult it and the. uti� t trrrr . enhance Oetau441 Arid 1.0119 t aye or' Uri r t t Rend;ni_:ir_r N Neiatibtxty„Othi;- .:AutigMjn West-r°t t h tgrr rl o° a i rpt, or " • : ' :�: ' TN' relatedof the =.lc s, determined r u ,al ch. orea, . q t tie fends " iat fIpprOved through the Cly',:budget" prop rant kinding wilt rpt to IIt 1fes'° dila. pITO , Legisrative Tro4kiroct 37 t L.' ..rtl im 7i! ICEMIZI ;IMI ilti, 0, 10 LT1 ..i3: c,- h.Ho 00 ,n ,.2 P r23 ;741' , I ...A, - :,,.....: .. . ri. ... gin - ...•,,-: — ,, lilt t4., ,::-, ,,,A• • • 6,.„m-:. o-..f.:1 • ' 61 - , . 0 Zi "- Ill - • . ,..4 .. F-1 , EL: ,. . REGAROM REONEST FOR 1011P)01004(FS2):2017,155a ts 06.1 FOR.ARMITECTII FM la .4 0, ilti Ka mamma 'SES FOR ., g ` 111 f O ERSTR1CT RESILIERCY MD int _, . i -aRaTikkiq: 4: Ranking 12.111.:.::: asInk W E i1 �:A sk ihhhd,, A. RO , 2 91 3 t 2 101. 2 11 1 r` 2 x 14 4 1 kiiiT.W hul n,.�hiim,P 1 1 1U4 1 OA 1 1 : bbn. r4 it,a IN !Y ATTACHMENT B REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) h 40 MIAWIBEACH. Procurement Department, 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3'd Floor,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov,305-673-7490 ADDENDUM NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES June 9, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined),. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q#1: What is the budget allocated /intended award amount for developing the Historic District Resiliency and Adaptation Guidelines? A#1: The budgeted amounts are not available at this time and will be based on individual projects. Q#2: Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements, as stated on page 27, #2. Required Similar Experience. "The Prime Proposer shall have completed construction documents for no less than one (1) similar project within the last ten (10) years. Similar projects shall be defined as the raising of historic buildings." During the pre-proposal meeting, it was stated that'the primary outcome of this work will be design guidelines, 'not construction or design documents. As such, should the similar experience be for the preparation of "design and construction guidelines for the raising of historic buildings" rather than the preparation of"construction documents"? Please clarify. A#2: While the City is only looking for Design Guidelines at this time. Construction expertise is needed to ensure the design is feasible and achievable in a developed environment. Q#3: RFQ p. 27: Required Similar Experience. Would the City consider extending the period to fifteen (15) years? A#3: No, the City will not consider extending the period to fifteen (15)years. Q#4: RFQ p. 27: Required 'Similar Experience. Alternately, would the City consider removing that particular requirement entirely, since (in my understanding) responding firms' experience would be primarily with wood-framed buildings; and only a very small number of buildings in Miami Beach are wood-framed? A#4: No. 1 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES Q#6: Section 0200, Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions, 2. Purpose, 2. Pool of Prequalified Consultants states: "Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants. Additionally, to assist with smaller engagements relating to historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants (not selected in Option 1 above) in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g), Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ, and who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager." Is it possible to submit a proposal for the pool of consultants? We are currently a sub under a prime team as the coastal and civil engineer. Is it possible to submit a separate proposal specifically for civil and coastal engineering as it pertains to the scope? Or does being a sub- consultant on a team automatically qualify us as candidates for the pool? A#6: In order to be considered for the pool of pre-qualified consultants, the firm shall submit a proposal as a prime consultant. Firms not selected as the prime consultant who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. • Q#7: Tab 2.3 Financial Capacity. It is unclear when the Supplier Qualification Report is to be �. submitted. It states "At the request of the City" and "Once requested by the City, no proposal shall be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet." Are we to submit the SQR prior to submitting our proposal, simultaneously with our proposal or will the City request the SQR after proposal is submitted? A#7: At the request of the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR).. Q#8: What is the boundary .of the subject property? The target districts are Flamingo Park and Collins Park. Will the flood area boundary match the Historic District boundary? A#8: The boundaries for the project are as provided below: • • ► i • 2 ADDENDUM No.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND.ADAPTATION GUIDELINES - i i v'.311 nritilW ws .t af� trAill oo it. in-.a ,.... iwo $141111* ''tittglYi ri ' S 1 igEl IL 11111 �t NIL r ? �a°�� #� w�� S'T" L[ yrs 0z� $� i „,, :& •ax1im� 4a8 n JLIP!;E1 '1 Si(t�/ice1±.13■■M II Ti ,..7. it; il ,am' qi-.6tAlt*:.iginiit:'4irek 2 --;,,,, kot,‘„, Mat 11111214 IAN. alai IIIIII:id::: ilera 111111 hiligkii: tt w torr �� -444 _:spa w. tRra 1 .411,ft 1 gm ins � aft . • • a-- zzimber hirocw.,,x74.4tiri WV rir�- ,,:r,,,„,:tsts..04:tf.,,,::;.AN.t,I.,@.-1 ' . s lt� w Ip.n � $ s � � , ' • YID w fi 1 s Tin" / "fit � 41,,,,,,",. "',.. r ... a �n Collins Watrerfront jg int v ' 4t, , StudyArea Boundary "�ll a~ � ' '2 Foot Sea Levet Rs i asi nil X11ib Contrihutiri Status A • me r?.>l�, z � • Cantrlbuting 't, ...y 1It! z � " c° W4 '. rw, . ri Not Ciasslfied 4 47/ y1'�'" ir".";S3t:' .Cn .:v Atn°fRiii'" ._. e� .�w�.,..,:..,.� i •i i 1 3 ADDENDUM'NO.2 -._...,,. _, REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES w —__ mig:iii .iirli SO L— t 1,...... )t,,,;h„..igi7 will = III,-..,,- aiii,-- mop NMI AM 1 MO ii1Tih1 =m..' MN LIT - 1wjIi1iIIJ1i=I - _ M ..= ra ; was ict ill 4Vii ilk omil f x i HIM ItIMMlM Mi ■�1MMMI s�t� �,� E ttaAwn,1 ,, :mill NM I� „mg lift Mil IM d 111114 ova Neit''''''ilmorlieritl Ma,,,,.„,,,, - all al all 09' 0 rIgl 1°153 il lisitm Nam.. r�a � - a - .....0 mow �_ " on on,� ' Icor ulii. a .rs, 0111111111111?-- 1 o ���.I'Pi d `� 1 t _ wrr mi , 5 �I B" z r �a �rail* —— a ,< rye.-.- WWII Il I 1�i.yyrr.F a 5�...i5 =,w..IIIf d1I ,.". 1 ,;x'.7111 1 al OEN , , szai 4 � .$4 S .ice 4'44,-,4%,_:' MY 9? :' == M F-----7 : '414 #.. yS w. yep AC4^`q"7ja'Yl I ,. I w-Man 4 't:4;-,W.' )1E1 " V - MI atIMMX14,4X „-_a h Mum: --, -- __..- 17 --.4f-:?- A ri,,t:, n–lSopfArg:-:---,1""WI i med,D.1.1. = = — . 1 t t oggg „ ,-dom .IV=ea gataiil rari i - "�. A+r P9 n% I Ea al 7.7 mew ini.jasi 1k . ,, ,wipER ii 1 1 ., fir y:K"I” I ,* .1 . , $,LI me I Flamingo Park r i1�.M1 _ ' 1» 'lam ka l4>'��, ~',w IU M�.. ' . . n ;NI;milli ,wool' 31111. i. I '�Study Area Boundary i 4,10° `", ` ` + 'ter ; 2 Foot Sea Level Rise �; ""' � ?el iNon i Contributing Status 4 111.E Contributing j O.: ,,----„ 1 maw h JJ ,mudn-Co'§ rI�i11, t Cla- 1 f�" 1 7 Q#9: Miami Beach was designated as a Certified Local Government on May 14, 2002. Have CLG grant funds been applied for as a part of this project? I A#9: No, CLG grantfunds•have not been applied for as part of this project. Q#10: Has Miami Beach established a planning position for sea level rise? If so, what is the baseline, i.e. what level of rise by what year? 4 , AtiDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB I.ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES 1 A#10: The City Commission adopted the unified sea level projections in April 2016 for planning purposes. The Baseline is as established in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Compact (see below). All city roads will be raised to a minimum elevation of 3.70' NAVD. a 9 } Unified Sea tel Rico Projection1 (5nut3ta Flacrda iieiant Cfinttea Ccrack.X02" . 70 r £ l to • { ` EGD .,,,,,,,m,..„,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,pihcit�tvj� t o I . t a". Sty R " G d�' '+ r�"wg "kiNCII # _43, as _ .. ._. ��RC'a4 1 A 2030 a ss m.,,a- - Y rhe-' V'situ 4" a40 1 2050- ` {s �t � x� ;yx, 9 --�f}�rn tie+ > -' " ::-- s� a.- 1 '"^ > ,,,,+ti, .'sS �{......>_.- ,_,,...._• �..`t "`1 ,.w er z ky�'r.�§'A �6.c.:,,.a� �y i3 i �s� z `3", t. " '7n''.:,. X35 x t ry .. tp> a 20 qqqq - E rp. ,.,..,-,,,,:-Y“-* 11.LT '......._._.....-.»-. ......._.....,......,w_. +.! ,,.,r r... _...._. 7 '/^Fs^ U�aC q. gMM Sti. nw...—...,........•.achy t5`;i� ....-.�......n.-•---- w x.... "" .......rxxw..,...-�..,i 1992 7000 7010 20213 21E0 '2040 20 2070 IMO 709f 1 Year figure It ttollted Seet.orel Rise Pr s,These it reloctione art Mc ot:z pd to moan eta level et the Hoy Walt tido gene.l.ao prolert€stet inthidtte three global tome adePte d for ft:Venal Ptpp attort:thrt median al th:6IPCC ARS RerLS stoned*at the/Timm;t boundary+(blue dined eturve);the USACE Nkt,h cams,tints upper hmtacIWr^r for the Overt tam for MO Vasal 2 d blasts lino),ata!the thMlilligh tura,*tte the opperinett tteuisai..ry for txrakils ants la4 tears t (map dad emit).Tito lattorpor le Oita the rrr alotUart wheat at yowl-t 2 O,7,4S0 oral 2100.7hol!r;C2i err t setae.NOM Intenentaftete Lawatt o b idiVLIVedontthe Ban for relaa rctt Weandealt cal rr$tr).This seerstr3oo would require tpigraatredau"tit+rts ltcrawl-hem gat{'rnheteatfaorder tobep3ttaild3and&etnet reed currentoratteloo7i -ti % c • II Q#11: Has a formal vulnerability assessment been prepared?` A#11: No, a formal vulnerability assessment has not been prepared. The City is in the process of preparing a vulnerability assessment, but it is in the initial stages. • Q#12: Has Miami Beach planned for raising of streets in these two districts? If so, to what elevation above existing? • A#12: All of the City's roads are being raised to a minimum elevation of 3.70 feet NAVD. Currently the areas within the Collins Park area have been raised or are in the process of being raised. The study located within Flamingo Park is not actively {? being raised. Q#13: Are your cultural resources addressed in your Local Mitigation Strategy? A#13: The City's mitigation strategy as included in the document prepared by Miami Dade County "Local Mitigation Strategy Miami-Dade County" focuses on stormwater management, raising of streets and seawalls as-well as installation of 5 ADDENDUM NO,2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES pumps. This document / assessment does not isolate "cultural" resources, it would include all structures within the affected area. Q#14: What are the cultural resource policies, if any, in the comprehensive plan? A#14: Within the Land use element of the comprehensive plan OBJECTIVE 4: HISTORIC AND NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION. Within the Conservation/Coastal Zone Management Element Objectives 2, 3, 8, 10, 11, and 12 deal with the City's' Resources and their preservation and expansion. The Historic �! Preservation Element places the, retention, protection and continued use of buildings as the Goal. 1 i Q#15: What existing preservation incentives are in place?Are there preservation tax incentives in place? A#15: The County offers a tax abatement for ten years for homes that are restored to the National Register standards. . Q#16: Will the City please provide the sample contract related to this RFP? A#16: The contract shall be provided during the negotiations to the awarded firm(s). Q#17: Will GIS and other spatial files managed by Miami/Dade be made available for use in the project? A#17: The City will provide one GIS file containing the information compiled from the Property, Building, and Foundation inspections, and other sources as necessary. Q#18: is there a separate Miami/Dade data set of recorded cultural resources, or are all sites recorded in the Florida Master Site File? If there is a separate data set, will it be made available for use in the project? A#18: The City is not aware of other "cultural resources" data sets, but respondents are welcome to research. Q#19: Will the City be providing a survey?Will the City be providing soils testing? A#19: The City will providing Data collected from FEMA Elevation Certificates.The data collected may include the following or similar information: 1. Folio Number 2. Address • 3. Building Use 4.Year Built 5. Number of Floors 6. Foot Print area 7. Total Building Area 8. Review of building archived plans from the building department 9. Type of foundation (Shallow/ Deep) 10. Type of first floor(Slab on grade/Structural Slab/ Elevated/ Material/ ...) 11.Type of Walls (Masonry/Concrete/Wood/reinforced or not) 6 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES 12. Split level first floor or continuous 13. Columns or load bearing walls 14. Overall structural condition of the structure (spalling/ deterioration /cracking) 15. Photo documentation iThe City Will not be providing Soils Testing. Q#20: Can you please advise what is the legal name and address that should be listed as the certificate holder? A#20: The legal name and address that should be listed as the certificate holder is City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139. • Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department • to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadona mlamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000, ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Si n�ely, A ex Denis i Pi ocur-- .-nt Director, • i 7 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES MIAMIBEACH Procurement Department, 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov,305-673-7490 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES June 6, 2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ isamended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. REQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The deadline for the receipt of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Monday, June 19, 2017, at the following location: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. IL ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-In Sheet Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at • RafaelGranado anmiamibeachfl.gov. Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000, ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective. Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sin A,•ely ' Ales DeP'- 1 rO,curement Director 1 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES EXHIBIT A , • Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-in Sheets { } ' i\AIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 15, 2017 TITLE: RFQ-2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES _....�,�.y � z kp is r 3t �T gs. r ' y� s ata �* s 466 ; s l t e �G`�� E� r�. t #� i fps �� a4�11�0� s r �I w a ug '^�� '°"` t a m'".€� k" t ! sir, ', - �3�. s f ✓�. s Ju' fs-"�! � -z ��, ;ir"� '? 4. +3• �` R fi'3 r,- tea": ,4-4; �,:',� i P ` dry ` % k' �r.`k(G•P I" fiA.S+E R.J T _. i z,>.f" r �� :' '. .�.� " § t �. an+'• ...rp t:,..:..:74*4, 2 °44Va.,*-S-_,.,�' .,,. "ra;,...,Fd.-.e3 �„'-0`�,'`4r,.'�`".. ..✓r'---' f.•ei` a.1..< .:�:# ,,.t .,a� ..•... Natalia Delgado Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 1111 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov . Ext. 6263 r`^ RO(V )ez and 7Do a ha P. G 4Vio3 600942 \ ,0142.4-vn- )es) a Ind-nn VAIIA \iva )Cja \-4,11.g L qq t*Oiork1 I, i �M C I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH • PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING • SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 15, 2017 TITLE: RFQ-2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES • x� m w xw.. �.Es F r s +atm. - .�wx{^`£`-[$rte3'. +,`S`r r�{ r ',,"'- '` ti=r&' 'f1.�+.?_ 1 x '` ,-9 sus fiT >'a r jE a F a 1S "3 mti �..4 ''s. �,Ks7 °-W''-,-67.6-***. (a,,r FX t v�y� '-,w .r+4 �'•{1+`+`... a3 X'xi+"n jJ, yr r 31, �� �C i(V P' \ML ^OSx pj�4 =- l# 11 ,p.•. v�i�L �'�r �'4� "£, e s � � �Yd "R 6 5 - '� �" � .moi i^! �i i �y ..,e. _: t' �r i ''1(NLC '� d+v rva�..� ti �„�pt ,�� sL`^ 1;t rr,� m , li*E byfri9 1/1do......- 1/__ / p NacLa mr'ournive4cliP Ajov 6/3, M10141c04 AF-C9U1- C-�r-1.4 GPr 305.372.1W Cil e-► M c* W e.„ 4-M. d,0,1k*Caoi-1 . Dea...4,44facAtrioty COOSUV`T1616 Xat4 � '7�6.28 �1 lip ,,i • YOOSStrRK44efri mt, pqA0,4114.62.1r7in. e-t\A" J 'WOO /4)019 12041" �SPGi�16 °Wil°.mss/- Jl.1 G c�,2p�t uotor' NQic e,64- to �+ [��/� fid (�1 ASS V 1r� 1 4-ikSSa CA -t '1 +� 7 Kl 1r V��' v1 Cs�{ Ch�/l 14 n r vl�i• �5 �j� o�i �h. 4'ii"' �C.�IUGI I hwtw�1 C costato u s y,ava- ���� �Zo�13a'.} N!,`ito tkeC00.47A VwI•Goth, • �C�f OSA Oee Dead fin.a X fvcac��S �S `g72,270$ goenfas a.5aqr'n oil. r'o. 0 vt i f i ( 2 , I\AIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: May 15, 2017 TITLE: RFQ-2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT •RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES a i �� 2 1[ '�4"`s�Y* 't'C t"�`'fii ice` OE �f.�a ;C% +��+" t"`P'F'r-y'X1- �bi3x �(jA �I Th7.max•,:-.s` ,:;v. w,- ,� zI ^'4l^*DA r 1KI aa:El_ �r '-=1'�I�.z.„ s1 ,i '� ' a"F. xs_ ' - , 2"�'�'L"`,y `�7 ..,,�.��.�.��er...._r._� rt.�„f'� - +'�,..�'�? � " �M �'° � '�, '��l�.P�,:� ',�.,�r.w�i6�-,� �?�r�/..�a?a1 .����,.+.�,,L �t 'Vie& Vo4 kt,ti pA k Aeou+d4'e it14)ca"1141 • • E • 3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ( RFQ) ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES 2017-155-KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE: APRIL 28, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: JUNE 12, 1017 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: 6_4 MIAMIBEACH NATALIA DELGADO, CONTRACTING OFFICER I PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.74901 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.govl www.miamibeachfl.gov ® MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 12 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 14 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON, QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 16 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 23 • APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIFICATIONS 25 APPENDIX D SPECIAL CONDITIONS 27 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 30 RFQ 2017-155-KB 2 m MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s) (the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www.publicpurchase,com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. By means of this RFQ, the City seeks to contract with consultants to provide professional services for historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines. The City of Miami Beach is seeking to develop guidelines and regulations for the renovation, raising and/or re-purposing of historic structures in low lying areas of the City that are vulnerable to ongoing and increasing tidal flooding, as well as the'long term impacts of sea level rise. Specifically, the City desires a multidisciplinary team of Professional Architects, Civil and Structural Engineers with experience in coastal engineering and hydrology, and Planners with expertise in Historic Preservation, or some combination thereof. Through this RFQ, the City desires to receive proposals from qualified firms that can provide professional services, in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, commonly referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act(CCNA). The City may, after considering proposals received, award contracts for services to a prime consultant(s), as well as create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants, as follows: 1. Prime Consultant(s). The City may make an award to qualified consultant(s)that can act in the capacity of the City's prime consultant for architectural and engineering services for historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines. The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decison-making process develop guidelines and regulations for the renovation, raising and/or re-purposing of historic structures in low lying areas of the City that are vulnerable to ongoing and increasing tidal flooding, as well as the long term impacts of sea level rise. While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant, it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest. Additionally, the City reserves the right to engage other consultants, either through option 2 below or through other means, to assist the City in its development of historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines. The prime consultant shall be selected in accordance with the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act for related projects as defined in Section 287.055(2)(f)(2), Florida Statutes. As such, the scope or value of the work awarded to the prime consultant shall not be limited to the limits established pursuant to Section 287.055(2)(g), Florida Statutes. 2. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants. Additionally, to assist with smaller engagements relating to historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines work (or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants (not selected in Option 1 above) in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g). Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ, and who are deemed to be responsive, responsible and best RFQ 2017-155-KB 3 m► MIAMI BEACH qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager. The process for considering qualifications proposals shall be as follows: 1. City will consider proposals received on or before the due date. 2. All responsive proposals will be submitted to the Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager for evaluation in accordance with the criteria established herein. Proposals deemed non-responsive will not be considered by the Evaluation Committee. ' 3. The City Manager will consider the results of the Evaluation Committee process and may recommend, in accordance with Section 19 below, one (1) or more Proposers to be short-listed by the City Commission to enter into contract negotiations. 4. The City intends to contract with a single prime proposer, but reserves its rights to contract with additional prime proposers, in accordance with Subsection 2.1 above. There is no project value limit on the work to be performed by the prime consultant. 5. Other responsive, responsible and best qualified Proposers may be eligible for the continuing pool of prequalified consultants in accordance with Subsection 2.2 above. Projects awarded to consultants in the continuing pool shall be limited to$200,000 for studies and design or engineering services shall be limited to projects with construction budgets under$2 million. GIVEN THAT THE CITY INTENDS TO AWARD A PRIME CONSULTANT AND ALLOW OTHER RESPONSIVE, RESPONSIBLE AND QUALIFIED PROPOSERS TO BE INCLUDED IN A CONTINUING POOL OF PREQUALIFIED CONSULTANTS,.ALL.QUALIFIED FIRMS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED.TO RESPOND TO THIS EtrQ,` .. 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation'is as follows: Solicitation Issued April 28, 2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting May 15, 2017 at 9:00am (EST) Deadline for Receipt of Questions June 2, 2017 at 5:00pm(EST) Responses Due June 12, 2017 at 3:00pm (EST) Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval TBD Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone:— Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7490 nataliadel•ado• miamibeachfl.gov Additionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranado a@miamibeachfl.gov; or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All RFQ 201/-155-KB 4 m► MIAMI BEACH responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936 (Toll-free North America). (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/Drocurement/scroll.aspx?id=23510 • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 - 5 m MIAMI BEACH • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE- DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70-300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a • conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. 10. COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 11. DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12. WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses, in the event of such non-compliance. 13. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision,of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 14. AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format; sign language interpreters (five(5)days in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please.call the Public Works Department, at 305-673- 7000, Extension 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any recommendation for selection of award in accordance with eh•proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City. Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 6 MIAMI BEACH 17. NOT USED. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing preference, the adjusted prices of two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service, then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 19. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of Step 1 & 2 outlined in Section 0400, Evaluation of Proposals, will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer.with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and,executed by the parties. 21. Postponement/Cancellation/Acceptance/Rejection. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any,and all, or parts of any and all, responses; re-advertise this RFQ; postpone or cancel, at any time, this RFQ process; or waive any irregularities in this RFQ, or in any responses received as a result of this RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120) calendar days after proposal opening date. A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any RFQ 201/-155-KB 7 MIAMIBEACH obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 23. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City, and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree, that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility, and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations. Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 26.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28. PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format. 29. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost and expenses for, or on account of, any copyrighted, patented, or unpatented invention, process, or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract, including its use by the City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design, device or materials covered by letters, patent, or copyright, it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device, or materials in any way involved in the work. 30. DEFAULT: Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or untimely withdrawal of a response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 31. MANNER OF PERFORMANCE. Proposer agrees to perform its duties and obligations in a professional manner RFQ 201,7-155-KB 8 MIAMI BEACH and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County, and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification; authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation, the contractor will assume the full duty, obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the • Proposer, or its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents, for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit • discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, and age or disability. • 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The city may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance (experience) in making an award that is in the best interest of the City, including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the award of contract. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C: Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, equipment, and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business,practices in the industry, and as determined by the City I of Miami Beach. E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance(experience), in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier, which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. 35. ASSIGNMENT. The successful Proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person, company or corporation, without the prior written consent of the City. RFQ 201/-155-KB 9 MIAMI BEACH 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE.When the successful Proposer(s) is in agreement, other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate inTurchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the'unit of. government or non-profit agency. 38. VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES. In the event of a conflict between the documents, the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking precedence; then C. The solicitation; then D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. 40. INDEMNIFICATION. The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the'expiration or termination of this Agreement. 41. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded. Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are ekempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in RFQ 201/-155-KB 10 m► MIAMI BEACH possession of the contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43. OBSERVANCE OF LAWS_Proposers are expected to be familiar with, and comply with, all Federal, State, County, and City laws, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which, in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s) on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 45. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date, or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47. EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ, and outline what, if any, alternative is being,offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated, in writing, in the Proposal. The City, at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected, the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors,or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec. 2-449 of the City Code, no officer or employee of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specific goods, services or facilities ("items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the City, through the approval of the Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000), may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work. When additional items are required to be added to the Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested, under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s) for these additional requirements. If these quote(s) are determined to be fair and reasonable, then the additional work will be awarded to the current contract vendor(s) that offers the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists). In some cases, the City may deem it necessary RFQ 2017-155-KB 11 ® MIAMI BEACH to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract,to be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors, or for other reasons at the City's discretion. Balance of Pape Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 201/-155-KB 12 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, proposer name, proposer return address. Statement of Qualifications received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbedas enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents. The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum -qualifications requirements established inAppendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience of projects that have been implemented, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of engagement. 2.1.1 Proposer shall include prior experience which exemplifies their experience in the following: • renovation of existing buildings in coastal historic districts, including, but not limited to, additions, elevating existing structures and yards and repurposing existing floors • ability to use cutting edge and advanced technologies in the preservation and adaptation of historic buildings and structures in low lying area • ability to create and advance guidelines and regulations, including corresponding illustrations • an understanding of the Southeast Florida landscape, geology, topography and vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. RFQ 2017-155=KB 13 ® MIAMIBEACH 2.2.1 Submit detailed information regarding team member's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submits as evidence of similar experience of projects that have been implemented, the following is required: project description, agency name,agency contact, contact telephone&email, and year(s)and term of.engagement. 2.2.2 Proposing team shall consist of a multidisciplinary team which include the following, but not limited to, specializations: • Professional Architects/Planner • Civil and Structural Engineers • Coastal engineering • Hydrology/Geologist • Planner with Specialization in Historic Preservation • Geotechnical • Project Cost Estimator 2.2.3 Proposer team shall include prior experience which exemplifies their experience in the following: • renovation of existing buildings in coastal historic districts, including, but not limited to„additions, elevating existing structures and yards and repurposing existing floors • ability to use cutting edge and advanced technologies in the preservation and adaptation of historic buildings and structures in low lying area • ability to create and advance design guidelines and regulations, including corresponding illustrations • an understanding of the Southeast Florida landscape, geology, topography and vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise 2.3 Financial Capacity. At the requestof the City, Proposer shall arrange for Dun & Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR) directly to the Procurement Contact named herein..Once requested by the City, no proposal will be considered without receipt, by the City, of the SQR directly from Dun & Bradstreet. The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer. The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapplwcs/storeslservlet/Su pplierPortal?storeld=11696 Proposals are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process, contact Dun&Bradstreet at 800.424.2495. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology, how Proposer plans to accomplish the required scope of services, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options, strategies for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFC) 20 I/-136-KB 14 MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions of a clarifying nature or oral presentations to the Evaluation Committee. The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager. The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1, Qualitative Criteria. In doing so, the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received, with or without conducting interview sessions. _ Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Proposer Experience and Qualifications 70 Approach and Methodology 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria, the Proposer may receive additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Department of Procurement to those points earned in Step 1, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Veterans Preference 5 The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the City within the last three (3) years from the due date for proposal. See Section 4 5 below. TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 10 4.Volume of Work Points: Points awarded to the proposer for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three (3)years in accordance with the following table: Less than$250,000 5 • $250,000.01 —$2,000,000 3 Greater than$2,000,000 0 RFQ 2017-155-KB 15 MIAMI BEACH 4. Determination of Final Ranking. At the conclusion of the Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management. Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Step 1 Points 82 76 80 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 104 91 92 Member 1 Rank 1 3 2 Step 1 Points 79 85 72 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 101 100 84 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Step 1 Points 80 74 66 Step 2 Points 22 15 12 Committee Total 102 89 78 Member 2 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 * Final Ranking is presented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RFQ 201/-155-KB 16 APPENDIX A IS, I �nIABEACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit 2017- 155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian AVenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 201/-155-KB 17 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: 2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES Procurement Contact Tel: Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Informations FIRM NAME: No of Years in Business: No of Years in Business Locally: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): • CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: • STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. RFQ 201(-155-KB 18 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten (10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by any public sector agency? I � YES II NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and,shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879, each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 201/-155-KB 19 7. came/in a ohini,lor. ort - -- -- _ - - -- --- -- _ - • ___ • !_ . Ii - -._ _•_ .. _. _ _ _ -.. .•e • -• .- .... . ___ __ to the living wage re eni 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RI-CQ 20 1/-1 SS-KB 20 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City.to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Beginning on December 1, 2016, the city shall not enter into a contract, resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. kl-Q 201/-163-KB 21 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations, and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive,agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of. Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. REQ 201/-155-KB 22 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: State of FLORIDA ) On this day of ,20_,personally appeared before me who County of ) stated that (s)he is the of , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida My Commission Expires: RFQ 201/-155-KB 23 APPENDIX B tri- MIAMI BEACH " No Bid " Form 2017- 155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 to it: tp irfan fort os n rs o ra. e recery d notific®ti;bn of N thrs solic tc tror b t € av decided dot .b rOspondx to complete and submit the c ttaehed"e S " to rt i f o,wBrc ," Thio"Statement of NO Bid`" provides. the City: with ins orr• at on ort pv tc imp ove thesolicitation profess. w Failure s br it Via, `State �er t of o id�""` may result rrr, n'ot being."notified of`° uture"solic ation b th ty. 24 RFQ 2017-155-KB Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal _Insufficient time to respond _Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements _Unable to meet insurance requirements _Do not offer this product/service • _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPT. ATTN: NATALIA DELGADO STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS#2017-155-KB 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3`d Floor MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 201/-155-KB 25 APPENDIX C ,_tr4. MIAMI BEACH Minimum Requirements & Specifications 2017- 155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND, ADAPTATION GUIDELINES PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 201/-155-KB 26 Cl. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit,with its proposal,the required submittal(s)documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. PRIME PROPOSER: 1. The Prime Proposer(Architectural/Planning Firm) shall hold a "Certificate of Authorization" by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. REQUIRED SIMILAR EXPERIENCE: 2. The Prime Proposer shall have completed construction documents for no less than one (1) similar project within the last ten (10) years. Similar projects shall be defined as the raising of historic buildings. Submittal Requirement: For each qualifying project,submit project name, project contact information (phone and email)and prime proposer's role in project. C2. Statement of Work Required. By means of this RFQ, the City seeks to contract with a consultant to provide professional services for historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines. The City of Miami Beach is seeking to develop guidelines and regulations for the renovation, raising and/or re-purposing of historic structures in low lying areas of the City that are vulnerable to ongoing and increasing tidal flooding, as well as the long term impacts of sea level rise. Specifically, the City desires a multidisciplinary team of Professional Architects, Civil and Structural Engineers with experience in coastal engineering and hydrology, and Planners with expertise in Historic Preservation,or some combination thereof. Proposing team shall consist of a multidisciplinary team which include the following, but not limited to, specializations: • Professional Architects/Planner • Civil and Structural Engineers • Coastal engineering • Hydrology/Geologist Planner with Specialization in Historic Preservation • Geotechnical • Project Cost Estimator Proposer team shall provide the following professional services for historic district resiliency and adaptation guidelines, but not limited to: • renovation of existing buildings in coastal historic districts, including, but not limited to, additions, elevating existing structures and yards and repurposing existing floors • ability to use cutting edge and advanced technologies in the preservation and adaptation of historic buildings and structures in low lying area • ability to create and advance design guidelines and regulations, including corresponding illustrations • an understanding of the Southeast Florida landscape, geology, topography and vulnerabilities to climate change and sea level rise RFQ 201/-155-KB 27 APPENDIX D MIAMIBEACH Special Conditions 2017- 155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 REQ 201/-1-55-KB 28 1.TERM'OF CONTRACT.Three(3)years. 2. OPTIONS TO RENEW. Two(2)additional one(1)year options 3. PRICES. Not Applicable. 4. EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES. Not Applicable. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of this Agreement by the Provider or its employees, agents, servants, partners principals or subcontractors. Provider shall pay-all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Provider expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Provider shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. 6. PERFORMANCE BOND. Not Applicable. 7. REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS. Not Applicable. 8.SHIPPING TERMS. Not Applicable. N. 9. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. Not Applicable. 11. BACKGROUND CHECKS. Not Applicable. 12. COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS. It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers& contractors. Consultant shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal. Under no condition shall Consultant include means & methods or product specifications that are considered "sole source"or restricted without prior written approval of the City. 13. PRECLUSION. Successful Proposer and sub-consultants contracted to provide architectural and engineering design services for a particular project are precluded from bidding/responding to the competitive solicitation for the design construction of the project. • 14. CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER. A change in the Consultant's project manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(i.e.the City project manager). 15. SUB-CONSULTANTS. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The RFQ 2017-155-KB 29 quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 16. NEGOTIATIONS. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer (s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services, deliverables and cost of services. 17. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract. By virtue of submitting a proposal, consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested, either through a separate agreement,work order,letter of engagement or purchase order. 30 APPENDIX E CA, MIAMIBEACH Insurance Requirements 2017- 155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES PROCUREMENT DIVISION 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 201/-155-KB 31 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. , XXX 1. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida. XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form), limits of liability $ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury property damage to include Premises/ Operations; Products, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in "insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured on the liability policies; and it must be stated on the certificate. 6. Other Insurance as indicated: Builders Risk completed value $ .00 Liquor Liability $ .00 Fire Legal Liability $ .00 Protection and Indemnity $ .00 Employee Dishonesty Bond $ .00 —_Other $ .00 XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Best's guide rating B+:VI or better, latest edition. XXX 9: The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured. Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. RFQ 201/-155-KB 32 ATTACHMENT C • CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ 41 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 1 of 2 Florida Department of State DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS e7MPp,, .org CI P.0 }.LYrt�r ►,� Wt i?!/f!1dt'kale of Plinth 11-_b4).;f Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number/ Detail by FEI/EIN Number Florida Profit Corporation ALLAN T.SHULMAN ARCHITECT, P.A. Filing Information Document Number P96000001466 FEI/EIN Number 65-0637279 Date Filed 01/05/1996 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 100 NE38 STREET • SPACE 2 MIAMI, FL 33137 • Changed:05/04/2005 Mailing Address 100 NE38 STREET SPACE 2 MIAMI, FL 33137 Changed:01/08/2010 Registered Agent Name&Address SHULMAN,ALLAN T 100 NE 38 STREET SPACE 2 MIAMI, FL 33137 Address Changed:05/04/2005 • Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title PRES SHULMAN,ALLAN T 100 NE 38 STREET,SPACE 2 MIAMI, FL 33137 Annual Reports http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inq... 12/21/2018 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 2 of 2 Report Year Filed Date 2016 01/26/2016 2017 01/12/2017 2018 01/12/2018 Document Images 01/12/2018—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2017—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format • 01/26/2016—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2015—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/13/2014—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/26/2013—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/09/2012—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format • 01/06/2011—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2010—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/24/2009—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/07/2008—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/29/2007—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/30/2006—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/04/2005—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/19/2004—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/0512003—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/21/2002—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/22/2001—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/22/2000—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format. 03/25/1999—ANNUAL REPORT • View image in PDF format • 04/15/1998—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/11/1997—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/1996—DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO 1997 View image in PDF format Florida Department of State,Division of Corporations • http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inq... 12/21/2018 Shulman Primary Proposer Contact: Associates Rebecca Stanier-Shulman 0: 305 438 0609 I C: 305 804 8876 rebecca@shulman-design.com Shulman + Associates (S +A) 100 NE 38th Street, Miami, FL 33137 June 19,2017 , Ms. Natalia Delgado,Contracting Officer I Department of Procurement Management 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 re:RFQ 2017-155-KB,Architectural and Engineering Services for Historic District Resiliency and Adaptation Guidelines Dear Ms. Delgado and Members of the Selection Committee: Shulman+Associates(S+A)is pleased to submit this qualifications package for the development of Historic District Resiliency and Adaptation Guidelines.We have assembled a tight,visionary team that can lead a complex process and arrive at forward- thinking solutions for the City. S+A is uniquely qualified architecturally,and from urban design and preservation perspectives;with over 20 years of experience F here and a grounding in local scholarship:we understand Miami Beach.Since 1996,our architectural, urban design and historic preservation firm has been involved in the evolution of the city,engaging in almost every aspect of development and redevelopment in the historic districts of Miami Beach.The office has done projects across the spectrum:from careful historic preservation to adaptive use to additions and transformation of historic properties into viable contemporary developments. We have engaged in neighborhood contextuality issues,worked with DEP in coastal zones,and dealt with many structural and foundation-related issues working with historic buildings,such as Browns Hotel,raised and relocated in the process of becoming Prime 112.S+A has completed over 75 built projects on Miami Beach working with private developers, nonprofits and public agencies,as well as a variety of stakeholders,from city staff and boards to individualneighbors to preservation groups.Strong scholarship and academic qualifications further underscore S+A's relevance.In parallel to the firm's professional projects, I have researched Miami Beach's historic districts over the past 20 years,publishing several books,articles and think pieces,as well as •curating exhibits;leading panel discussions and lecturing widely on the architecture and architectural history of Miami Beach. Through this work I have,in many cases,established or expanded the points of relevance of the historic districts of Miami Beach that now face this need for change in the face of sea level rise. Furthermore,as the Director of Graduate Programs in Architecture at the University of Miami, I have organized,led and participated in numerous design and planning charrettes and studies, locally, regionally and internationally. S+A has brought together a lean,expert team that has directly relevant,current experience in resiliency planning for other major coastal cities across the globe: Firm Team Role S-i-A Architecture; Urban Design; Historic Preservation ARUP Structural/Coastal/Civil/Geotechnical Engineering;Sustainability; Hydrology/Geologist; Project Cost Estimating DLANDstudio Landscape Architecture; Resiliency Planning YCHE Structural Engineering/Local CSI Coastal/Civil/Geotechnical Engineering/Local SJHH Building Elevation/Relocation Specialist Resiliency guidelines for our historic districts are a crucial next step for Miami Beach as it evolves to meet the challenges presented by sea level rise and climate change.We believe that the S+A team brings the right balance of local and international knowledge to best serve the City of Miami Beach for this important work. Sincerely, /5/"?2-7 Allan Shulman FAIA, LEED!�P`�'J • Principal,Shulman+Associates TAB 1 11.1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS S+A I ARUP I OLAND 1 . 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ' 11 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 - Cover Letter and Table of Contents 1.2 - Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A) 1.3 - Minimum Qualifications Requirements y Experience and Qualifications "; 2.1 - Qualifications of Proposing Firm .� 2.2 - Qualifications of Proposer Team �f (N/A- SQR not requested by City) `ge •`' Approach and Methodology 1 `M .y i S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1.1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS I TAB 1 S+AIARUPIDLAND 1 - . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: 2017-155-KB ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HISTORIC DISTRICT RESILIENCY AND ADAPTATION GUIDELINES Procurement Contact Tel: Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 NATALIADELGADO@a MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Allan T.Shulman Architect,PA dba Shulman+Associates No of Years in Business: 21 No of Years in Business LocaIly: 21 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Allan T.Shulman Architect,P.A. FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 100 NE 38 Street,Space 2 CITY: Miami STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33137 • TELEPHONE NO.: (305)436-0609 TOLLFREENO.: N/A FAX NO.: (305)438-0170 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 100 NE 38 Street,Space 2 CITY: Miami STATE: ZIP CODE: FL 33137 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Rebecca Stanier-Shulman ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (305)438-0609 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL rebecca@shutman-design.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 65-0637279 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. `FQ 201 -145 -KB_ 18 S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION I TAB 1 1 . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? DYES x NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent,sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates N/A 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. See attached Exhibit A SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an ublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the.City's Campaign-Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. N/A 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics CCode")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposaVresponse or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. See attached Exhibit B SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. RFQ 2017-15-KB )9 TAB 1 I 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1 . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION 7. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are'awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. N/A our firm does not have 51 or more full time employees. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does.your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO c. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified.Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g.,there are noinsurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 'FQ 21 _1 .5 -'B 20 S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION I TAB 1 1 . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;,may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit.document,Proposer agrees itis and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement.Beginning on December 1;2016,the city shall not enter into a contract,resulting from a competitive solicitation issued pursuant to this article,with a business unless the business certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices,and standards that are consistent with the city's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in article V of chapter 62 of this Code. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt (LJ Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 . r./3 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. FQ201 :-5 -KB 21. TAB 1 I t2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1 . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its. best interest.In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of / Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicants affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these.requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and doesnot constitute allor.any part of an agreement: The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto,are approved and executed by the parties,and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications,and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto,or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages.The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disdosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. R 2017155 B 2 S+A I ARUP I OLAND 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION I TAB 1 1 . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION PROPOSER'GERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document; inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation,and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements • of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted;Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal;proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;all responses,data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Rebecca Stanier-Shulman Marketing Principal Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: ,r , ,,! 9//9- State of FLORIDA ) On this/Zday of(lU ,20LLrsonally appeared fore me RebeccaStanierSruu,,an who County of Dada ) stated that (s)he is the Madan anxrazr of Snumial.ass aarvs ,a corporation,and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation-by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed.Before me: Notary Public for the State of Fl 'da My Commission Expires: a 4y, pqY Pt Sr ELIZABETH COX o! .,% Notary Public-State of Florida/tk •` My Comm.Expires Jun 3.2018 .. , Commission#FF 128846 B AMIELMEMIENIIIEMSCES 23 TAB 1 I 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION Si-A I ARUP I DLAND 1 . 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT A REFERENCES& PAST PERFORMANCE COLEE HAMMOCK NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES Firm Name: Colee Hammock Neighborhood Contact Individual Name&Title: Ms.Jaye Abbate, Former President, Colee Hammock HOA Contact address: c/o ArtServe, 1350 E.Sunrise Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33304 Contact telephone number: (954)462-8190 x 204 Contact email address:jayea@artserve.org Narrative on scope of services provided:S+A was the Primary Planner for the development of design guidelines and a master plan for Colee Hammock,one of the oldest neighborhoods in Broward County. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH NORTH BEACH SIGNAGE& BRIDGES DESIGN Firm Name: City of Miami Beach Contact Individual Name &Title: Mr.Jeff Oris,CEcD Director Contact address: 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, FL 33139 Contact telephone number: (305) 673-7577 Contact email address:JeffOris@miamibeachfl.gov Narrative on scope of services provided:S+A is the Architect and Planner for the design of two new entry features for North Beach as well as improvements to the 71st Street Bridge. We presented design options for new signage and bridge improvements to the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Committee and developed an identity package of common,themed design elements that can be used on other public property identification signage and/or on improvements for other bridges in North Beach. - "BROWNS HOTEL/PRIME 112. Firm Name: Koniver Stern Group Contact Individual Name&Title: Nelson Fox Contact address:407 Lincoln Road,Suite 704, Miami Beach, FL 33139 Contact telephone number: (305)532-6100 Contact email address: mrnelsonfox@yahoo.com Narrative on scope of services provided: Browns Hotel was the first hotel on Miami Beach.S+A's restoration was the first adaptive re-use of a commercial wood structure in Miami Beach, requiring careful investigation and innovative solutions. The building was relocated and raised to allow for more comfortable ceiling heights. EXHIBIT B CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS Shulman+Associates has adopted, as required,the City of Miami Beach Code of Business Ethics, as per Resolution 2000- 238779. S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION I TAB 1 1 _ 2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION 4. : t STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION -- ' BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE & INTERIOR DESIGN (850)487-1395 2601 BLAIR STONE ROAD TALLAHASSEE FL 32399-0783 ALLAN T SHULMAN ARCHITECT, P.A. 100 NE 38TH ST SPACE 2 MIAMI FL 33137 Congratulations' With this license you become one of the nearly one million Floridians licensed by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Our professionals and businesses range ' +, STATE OF FLORIDA from architects to yacht brokers,from boxers to barbeque ' '``F DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND restaurants,and they keep Florida's economy strong. "`' PROFESSIONAL REGULATION Every day we work to improve the way we do business in order AA26001090 ISSUED 02/27/2017 to serve you better. For information about our services,please log onto www.myfloridalicense.com. There you can find more ARCHITECT CORPORATION information about our divisions and the regulations that impact ALLAN T SHULMAN ARCHITECT.P.A you,subscribe to department newsletters and learn more about the Department's initiatives. Our mission at the Department is:License Efficiently,Regulate Fairly.We constantly strive to serve you better so that you can serve your customers. Thank you for doing business in Florida, is CERTIFIED under the prov'sions of Ch 481 FS. and congratulations on your new license' Ew,won care FEB 29 2019 L1102270000195 DETACH HERE RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR MATILDE MILLER,INTERIM SECRETARY STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN : LICENSE NUMBER AA26001090 The ARCHITECT CORPORATION Named below IS CERTIFIED Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS Expiration date FEB 28.2019 ALLAN T SHULMAN ARCHITECT, PA. ='F r • ❑ 100 NE 38TH ST SPACE 2 MIAMI FL 33137 •• r • ISSUED' 02/27/2017 DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SEQ# L1702270000785 TAB 1 I 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1 . 3 MINIMUM ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Prime Proposer Shulman +Associates(S+A)has completed over 75 projects in the historic districts Miami Beach that have involved studying, restoring, reconfiguring and expanding historic buildings. These projects are found at Tab 2. Our similar experience requirement is met with a single project across Biscayne Bay. in the Design District. Project Name Prime Proposer Role The Billboard Building Shulman + Associates was the Architect-of-Record for the building, and is now the Miami, Florida Architect-of-Record for its buildout to accomodate a school tenant. Project Contact Located at the entrance to Miami's Design District, at the intersection of Interstate Building(2015): 195 and NE 2nd Avenue (the district's North-South main street), the Billboard Alex Karakhanian Building exploits its location to maximum effect. The project combines a 3-story AKORP Holdings 1920s commercial building, for which the ground level was raised slightly, with (305) 924-0574 cell a slender addition that rises more than 90 feet. The addition embraces the old akarakhanian@gmail.com building, with the wrapper forming a billboard that faces the highway corridor on one side, and an art-wall that faces the district on the other. The architectural Tenant(2017): integration of the two buildings contrasts the ornate stucco facade of the original Giorgio Invernizzi with the transparent, scenographic qualities of the tower. Istituto Marangoni +39 (0) 2 76023032 S+A's design for the Billboard Building has been widely publsihed and recognized g.invernizzi@istitutomarangoni.com with a 2017 AIA Florida Honor Award (Restoration/Renovation) and a 2014 AIA Florida Honor Award(Unbuilt). ' • • 1 Ir ..11111H s. tit� -4I• MI MII � � 1�I a • Collavino,2017 S+A I ARUP I DLAND 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS I TAB 1 2 . 1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Shulman+Associates(S+A)was founded in 1996 by Allan Shulman FAIA,LEED AP as a multidiscipinary firm encompassing urban design, architecture, interior design, historic preservation, and graphic and exhibit design. S+A's relevance lies in a deep understanding of context and history that forms the basis for transformative adaptive use, renovation and new construction working with historic buildings in designated historic districts. Having worked for over two decades in Miami Beach, S+A has developed a unique expertise. The city, landscape, culture, and building program are laboratories for our contemporary design practice. The firm, currently 14 employees, comprises architects, designers, project managers, technical draftspeople and support staff. S+A has a significant depth of experience in the historic districts of Miami Beach, completing projects for 75 hotel, retail, residential and cultural institutions. S+A is adept at navigating the neighborhood and City approvals and leading clients to optimal results by working closely with the City from early in the process. In addidtion to the professional work of the office, Shulman also brings a depth of research and academic projects.Under the auspices of the University of Miami and his role as Director of Graduate Programs in Architecture, Shulman led master planning efforts for industrial German cities such as Zchornewitz and Bochum, for the BAM Cultural District in Brooklyn, for Lake City, Florida, and for a new community cente in Abuja, Nigeria. Shulman has been the principal author of three National Register of Historic Places Designation Reports and has written seventy-five (75) historic resources reports for buildings and sites in Miami Beach and Miami. He has also authored or co-authored books on the built environment, modernism and tropicalism, including The Discipline of Nature: Architect Alfred Browning Parker in Florida(HistoryMiami/University Press of Florida,2017),Building Bacardi:Architecture, Art& Identity(Rizzoli, 2016), Miami Architecture:An AIA Guide (UPF, 2013), Miami Modern Metropolis: Paradise & Paradox in Midcentury Architecture & Planning (Balcony/ Bass Museum, 2012); and The Making of Miami Beach (Rizzoli, 2001). Shulman is also an editor, lecturer, curator and associate professor at the University of Miami School of Architecture. In its research and design work, S+A is committed to the conservation and elaboration of Miami's built heritage, contributing a signature, interdisciplinary style that reinterprets the existing fabric of the city while introducing contemporary themes and structures. S+A has received international recognition,including 78 design and preservation awards and publication of its work in international and national journals and magazines. S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB 2 2 . 1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM r ■ Eilillif I s ....,....,111 ""- — 7a --,• + II• ' :.)-". �.. ,1...\ ✓-.. IND Ii0 YIf • - I ?DI I�1 is - _P- Ni 1IR R„- 11 :*. .-:'...:,j : i ! 1 • ' � � — ter• .: .F 17 Et ti SIVIIITIMII qmi. - .. E frur vera ic4 t + 13- 3.. 1---�fp . . :k = -fir lit.... �;b%a ••iun , DOM 4ovevia •(- • . '•••• •••••••••iimum..1111 1 p � wccttiNta �J... ., i �I ; • IIL• awl � , „, r r• r $ ��•f ..t7 i tri *. •e � � SLG7tQriil ,J"' ♦4 ff1�"� 10''....ri�h�- M�. ~ R : ” .. 4, .. 5 R . -9C •• r _ �! i . ii : ill 0 o silra� TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2 . 1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Projects on Miami Beach HOTELS HOUSING Lucky Jeans Lincoln Road Betsy-Carlton Hotel 1020 Pennsylvania Avenue Peek-A-Boo Building 12th and Collins Hotel 2200 Collins Campanile Savoy Torino Retail Angler's Resort+Spa 22nd and Park Housing Sterling Building Aqua Hotel 304-312 Ocean Drive Steve Madden Store Browns Hotel/Prime 112 354 Washington Avenue Swarovski Lincoln Road Casa Casuarina/Versace 7207 Bay Drive The Vitrine/909 Collins Ave Collins Plaza Hotel 744 Lincoln/Chrysler Tower Ulta Everwear/337 Lincoln Crescent Hotel Casa Casuarina Residences Victoria's Secret Collins Avenue Dorchester Hotel 2032 Alton Road Victoria's Secret Mead Bldg Empire Hotel 2142 North Bay Road Walgreens Mid-Beach Fairwind Hotel 5777 La Gorce Drive Walgreens South Beach Governor Hotel Roosevelt Theater Greenview Hotel RETAIL Greystone Hotel 433 Lincoln Road INSTITUTIONAL+CULTURAL Indian Creek Hotel 530 Lincoln Road ArtCenter South Florida/Art Tower James Avenue Hostel 541 Lincoln Road ArtCenter South Florida/Art Windows Lily Hotel 1334 Alton Road ArtCenter South Florida/Galleries 800&924 Look Inn/418 Meridian 600 Collins Avenue ArtCenter South Florida/New Headquarters Palms Hotel 161 Washington Avenue ArtCenter South Florida/Nunnally Building Plaza Hotel MB 727 Collins Avenue Bath Club Ritz Carlton Dilido 736 Collins Avenue La Gorce Country Club Rivage Hotel 909 Collins Avenue Sagamore Hotel 601 Washington Avenue Savoy-Arlington Hotel 633 Lincoln Road Santa Barbara Hotel 723 North Lincoln Lane Sea Spray Hotel 852 Collins Avenue Soho Beach House 1688 Meridian Avenue South Seas Hotel 1674 Meridian Avenue Tides Hotel Terrace AliSaints Lincoln Road Ann Taylor Lincoln Road HOMES Apple Store Lincoln Road Aqua Townhouses ArtCenter South Florida Lincoln Belvedere House Road Benson House Banana Republic Lincoln Rd Berberian House BCBG Lincoln Road Blanchet House Belvetro Lincoln Road Duncan Lee House Crocs Lincoln Road Mashrabiya House David's Cafe+Market North Bay Road House FCUK Lincoln Road Pine Tree Drive House Forever 21/701 Lincoln Rd Royal Palm House Fritz's Lincoln Road Sunset Island House H&M/The Lincoln Theatre Zamboli House JugoFresh Continuum Si-A I ARUP I DLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB 2 SHULMAN + ASSOCIATES : RESUMES Allan Shulman has 25 years of experience in architecture, interior design, Allan T.Shulman, FAIA, LEED®AP urban design,and historic preservation.He founded Allan T.Shulman PC InCI el Architect, P.A.(now Shulman+Associates) in 1996.As principal of the p firm, he has focused primarily upon design and strategy, including complex renovation and expansion projects, hospitality planning and design, residential works, historic preservation and research consulting and urban design.Rooted in Miami Beach, Shulman has been at the forefront of •. redevelopment in that city. Shulman creates site-specific designs based on multidisciplinary research and the exploration of ideas, synthesizing the distinct circumstances of each project into designs that are relevant and transformative.The city, landscape, culture,and building program are laboratories for his contemporary design '"• • practice.His work is widely published, and has been honored with over 78 design awards.Shulman is Director of Graduate Programs in Architecture ; and an associate professor at the University of Miami School of Architecture, and author of several books and essays focusing on the architecture of Miami Beach.He lectures internationally and has organized numerous conferences and exhibitions on regional design themes.He has organized Education several charettes and conferences that tackled issues of sea level rise.Most recently, he was a panelist on On Point with Tom Ashbrook for"Miami Boom Master of Architecture, University of Miami, Florida (and Climate Doom?)"and was quoted extensively in Matt Tyrnauer,"Can Bachelor of Architecture,Cornell University, New Miami Beach Survive Global Warming?"in Vanity Fair. York Selected Relevant Experience Independent Studies,Waseda University,Tokyo, Japan North Beach Signage, Bridge Beautification and Design Guidelines, City of Miami Beach Professional Qualifications Registered Architect, NCARB, Florida North Beach Village(Fort Lauderdale)Tactical Revitalization Plan LEED Accredited Professional 75 built hotel, retail and commercial properties in Miami Beach Professional Qualifications Bochum/Ruhr Valley, Bochum, Germany, Green Corridor Charrette and American Institute of Architects, Miami Chapter, Area Plan Board Member U.S.Green Building Council, Member Town of Lake Park, Florida, Charrette and Master Plan Congress for New Urbanism, Member Wildwood Preservation Plan,Wildwood, NJ Charrette and Area Plan Society of Architectural Historians, Member Dessau and Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany,Charrette and Master Plan Individual Awards Gewachhausstadt/Green House City,Zschornewitz, Germany, Charrette 2017 AIA Florida Gold Medal and Regional Plan 2016 AIA Miami Architectural Education of the Year A Vision for Lincoln Lane, Miami Beach, FL 2011 AIA Miami Architect of the Year 2010 H.Samuel Kruse AIA Silver Medal for Design North Beach Village, Ft.Lauderdale, FL,Tactical Revitalization and Master Plan 2008 Fellow of the American Institute of Architects 2007 AIA Miami Firm of the Year Colee Hammock Master Plan&Neighborhood Improvements, Ft. Lauderdale, FL Hollywood North Beach Master Plan/Community Code, North Hollywood Beach, Hollywood, FL TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND Alyssa Kriplen,AIA, LEED®AP Area of Expertise Architectural Projects Director As an associate partner overseeing the day-to-day progress of the S+A design studio, Ms.Kriplen brings 15 years of experience in planning and large-scale commercial, institutional, multi-family and hospitality projects. At S+A, Kriplen manages large-scale projects including several on Miami Beach.She is skilled at strategizing phasing and navigating the often complex approvals processes of Miami Beach. Kriplen's relevant experience includes numerous projects on Miami Beach;the North Beach, Fort Lauderdale Tactical Revitalization project; and several projects for the City of Miami Beach as client.Prior to S+A, she worked on master planning and visioning efforts for New Orleans, following Hurricane Katrina,and the town center master plans for the City of Cutler Bay. Her planning experience was also utilized on many large scale commercial properties aimed at creating outdoor retail experiences,such as Park Square at Doral, Millennium Mall, Midtown Miami and Broward Blvd. Ms.Kriplen has an extensive knowledge of local and national codes, including the procedures for adapting existing structures for new uses with careful consideration for the environment and Education sustainability in a modern design vernacular. Master of Architecture,exchange, University of California, Berkeley Bachelor of Architecture, University of Melbourne,Australia Professional Qualifications Licensed Architect, New York LEED Accredited Professional Professional Affiliations American Institute of Architects, Miami Chapter, Member Awards 2013 AIA Miami Young Architect of the Year 2014 Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Award S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB 2 SHULMAN + ASSOCIATES : RESUMES S+A Associate Hisham Suliman has 30 years of professional experience. He is Hisham Suliman, RA, LEED®AP Director of Construction at the firm and has directed Construction Observation on Associate, Sr. Project Manager numerous S+A projects.He has managed internal teams as well as subconsultants, vendors and contractors, ensuring effective performance.With a strong grounding in techniques for building on waterfront sites, Hisham will bring his expertise in buildability and his understanding of historic buildings to the team. Hisham Suliman has served as Director of Construction or QA/QC Director on the following S+A projects located on Miami Beach: South Seas Hotel,Miami Beach,FL S+A is the Architect for this 118-key boutique hotel involving renovation of an historic hotel and a new 7-story addition comprising new rooms,a 2-story cabana / and new pool. - o Fairwind Hotel,Miami Beach,FL -x S+A is the Architect for this 78-key boutique hotel involving renovation of 3 Education historic buildings and new addition of a 6-story rooms annex. Master of Science in Architecture and Building Savoy-Arlington Hotel,Miami Beach,FL Design S+A is the Architect for this oceanfront property, involving restoration of two Columbia University, New York, NY existing historic structures and addition of 4 new building components comprising a 134-key,145,000 SF boutique hotel. Bachelor of Arts in Architecture Pratt Institute, New York, NY U So Fi Hotel,Miami Beach,FL S+A was the Architect and Interior Design for this 28,000 SF,46-unit project Professional Qualifications consisting of the renovation of an historic 3-story hotel,an historic one-story Registered Architect, NCARB, Florida commercial building and a new annex. LEED Accredited Professional Greystone Hotel,Miami Beach,FL S+A is the Architect for this 40-key boutique hotel comprising renovation of a 3-story structure and new rooftop structures. Santa Barbara Hotel,Miami,FL S+A is the Design Architect for this boutique hotel that involves renovation of an existing historic building and additions. TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND Michael Goodwin Jr. S+A Project Architect Michael Goodwin has 7 years of professional experience. Project Architect He is involved in the Schematic phase of many of the firm's design projects.In addition to his international architectural experience, Michael brings to the team a strong understanding of sustainability and sustainable practices.He led volunteer groups for Epic Homes Collaborative in fast-build projects,and has helped to build houses and communities for underprivileged indigenous people and areas in need of disaster and humanitarian relief in Malaysia. As part of Build = for Tomorrow,a program by Wild Asia, he helped to build facilities for a native '"'_ Temuan community in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Selected Relevant Experience ° Michael Goodwin has served as Project Architect and Designer on the following ° Shulman+Associates projects: 1688-1674 Meridian Avenue,Miami Beach,FL S+A is the Design Architect for the renovation and reskinning of two midcentury commercial buildings. Education 161 Washington Avenue,Miami Beach,FL Bachelor of Architecture S+A is the Design Architect and Interior Architect for the adaptive reuse of a Florida Atlantic University contributing building within the Ocean Beach Historic District to convert it from medical offices and residences,to a restaurant. 727 Collins Avenue,Miami Beach,FL S+A is the Design Architect for proposed modifications to this contributing building within the Ocean Drive/Collins Ave Historic district,to better position the property for a variety of uses included retail or restaurant. Individual experience: T.R.Hamzah and Yeang Sdn.Bhd.,Ampang,Selangor,Malaysia Michael served as Project Architect on numerous projects over 5 years at the firm,working closely with Principal Dr.Ken Yeang,an innovator in ecology based green design and master planning.His projects included: Y Burma,Penang,Malaysia Design of a 22-story mixed-use hotel development. 3.MX-1 Kwasa Damansara Township;Land Area:64 acres, Permissible GFA: 9,768,112 sqft. Aimed at being a Carbon Neutral Ecocity and Ecological-Driven,this mixed use masterplan outside Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia integrates our human activities and structures into the natural environment in order to conserve regional biodiversity and habitats.Design concepts in the ecological driven masterplan include vegetated gardens,sky courts,terraces and roofs, landscape compost centers, recycling zones,covered pedestrian corridors,passive mode transport, integrated urban wellness and 7 minute walking proximity to main amenities. Selangor Science Park 2: The overall objective of the mixed use masterplan is to create an ideal urban development in Selangor, Malaysia created through smart energy use,careful consideration of materials,and diversity in residential and commercial building typologies. S+A I ARUP I OLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB 2 SHULMAN + ASSOCIATES : RESUMES Adam Breaux brings to the team knowledge gained from his work at S+A on projects Adam Breaux in coastal and historic districts, as well as his individual experience including design Project Manager in coastal districts and the development of hurricane preparedness standards in his home state of Louisiana. Selected Relevant Experience Adam Breaux has served as Project Manager and Designer on the following Shulman +Associates projects: t. IA Marriott Courtyard Hotel,Miami,FL S+A is the Design Architect for this 40-story mixed-use tower combining a 270- ' N key hotel with amenities and public spaces.While designed to strike an iconic Pb <f figure on the skyline, it is a thoughtful, pedestrian-friendly structure at the street, combining wide sidewalks with mixed uses at the base. 2032 Alton Road,Miami Beach,FL S+A is the Design Architect for renovations and additions to an architecturally Education significant pre-1942 home, including modofications to adjust the yard height and provide new square footage above flood level. Master of Architecture 1334 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL University of Louisiana at Lafayette S+A is the Design Architect for the adaptive reuse of an existing 1950's 2 story Bachelor of Science/Architecture building, from apartments to ground level commercial uses. The design University of Louisiana at Lafayette Individual experience: Harriet R.Tubman Elementary School,Algiers,LA Full renovation of 1920s school in Algiers, small town across the river from New Orleans. 704 Piety Street,New Orleans,LA Interior renovation of 1920s house in the Historic Marigny/Treme/Bywater Residential District.The home was damaged by hurricane winds during Hurricane Katrina and was abandoned for about 9 years. Outdoor Teaching Pavillion @ Fannie C. Williams School,New Orleans,LA. Design of a small outdoor pavilion and planters to teach gardening to children attending the Fannie C.Williams elementary school. TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Browns Hotel Miami BeachBRO N . !pig Description of services provided Browns Hotel was the first hotel in Miami Beach,and the archetype for the glamorous hotels that made the city =. America's winter playground.A vernacular wood framed " and wood clad structure, Browns was erected the same year as Miami Beach's incorporation. Cocooned in stucco during the 1930's, Browns slipped into obscurity Completion �` — _ -i■ s until its renovation. During restoration, the stucco was removed and the structure was lifted and moved back 15 feet, allowing the reconstruction of its historic front porch. The ground floor was retrofitted as a restaurant while the upper floors comprise hotel suites. r4O TEL r, vs As part of the restoration and adaptive use of Miami Beach's first and oldest hotel, designed by S+A, ��~� t—�c Browns hotels was raised approximately two feet, ,. „ x ' perhaps the only case of such building elevation in the city. In collaboration with our structural engineer, building movers, and the City's Planning Department, S+A developed the strategy that raised the buildiing — min on hydraulic jacks, accommodated new foundations During restoration beneath the raised wood-built structure, and adopted a strategy of raising the ground-level of the site so as to preserve a true relationship between the historic building and its site.Oolitic rock site walls were used to accommodate the new height differential between the ,-.--,. :. site and Ocean Drive. ; - .. During restoration Reference contact info: A« Nelson Fox T: (305)785-4455 E: mrnelsonfox@yahoo.com ter= IIS", 1 Pre-restoration S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB 2 S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Soho Beach House Restoration, Renovation and Additions Miami Beach Description of services provided This boutique hotel project layers old and new, rejuvenating an historic property. Its design promotes indoor-outdoor connectivity with spaces flowing from 01 1. street through to ocean. The site on Collins Avenue and 44th Street effectively terminates the hotel row of Miami Beach, lined with F resorts facing the ocean.The historic structure on the k ' site,the Sovereign Hotel,was designed by architect Roy , riorteriii France and built in late November 1941.The hotel has itw•e.. 11' been in continuous operation since the postwar, andG 1 µ remains largely intact. ,; s;;�. ' ' .._ji.I Design of the Soho Beach House, the Florida branch of a London-based boutique hotel and social club, comprised the restoration of the Sovereign Hotel; aI 15 story oceanfront tower addition;and the developmentOA A of elaborate gardens and varied public spaces. *` , A rich array of new amenities was added to the 0 .. ' historic site. Separate topographies are vertically and :, '` horizontally layered within a narrow open space. To make the most of limited space,the firm terraced the site .1 ' upwards from the street to the beach dune. Residents and guests progress through a changing landscape as _ the hotel's public areas on the ground floor merge with a li `J' raised boardwalk and sandy and landscaped platforms 1 . that lead to the beachfront. ., , r ',• kko The slender tower's precast concrete brise-solei) fr7 1 r provides both shade and privacy, allowing guests to la * comfortably experience the outdoors on the deep t,., ,., f=r,' ! P , t,,: - concrete slab balconies.Taken together,the elements of j _ ' '` } this project offer a lush enclave of public/private, indoor/ .,✓' '` ` outdoor rooms in a heavily-developed area of Miami -_' . , .. Beach. y''. Y . � t' t;Wi gi Y Reference contact info ' :ifz. • T:Nick Jones+44 207 851 1180 ` . Nth U ;` "' •; a ilk i ,, ..., .. ; , . . iso: TAB 2 1 2 1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Billboard Building Miami, FL Team name and roles .r.v '* 7 t, AKORP Holdings t� ? � Year substantially completed a 2016 ' , * , <W Project Description 4,14,4,4,,,,,..,, , Located at the entrance to Miami's Design District, at '-.1.'4,<®� '',141,: l the intersection of Interstate 195 and NE 2nd Avenue (the district's N-S main street), the Billboard Building exploits its location to maximum effect. The project combines a 3-story 1920s commercial building with a slender addition that rises more than 90 feet. The i addition embraces the old building, with the wrapper • 41 forming a billboard that faces the highway corridor on , one side, and an art-wall that faces the district on the other.The architectural integration of the two buildings contrasts the ornate stucco façade of the original, with the transparent,scenographic qualities of the tower. r Reference contact info Alex Karakhanian,Client • T:305 924 0574 E:akarakhanian@gmail.com ! ... - 1111 • • al i 111 al • ii I> 1 Mill I T ai I . . . . _,-...„ i: ...,,,, . Al 4... f ' k. t , `t. ' FI S+A I ARUP I GLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB2 S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Colee Hammock Master Plan & Neighborhood Improvements Colee Hammock, Fort Lauderdale Team name and roles Colee Hammock Homeowners Association-Client �0 Shulman+Associates-Urban Designer �.___._.____;_.__._._._._._._. ,. 11 .- 1 Year designed I a.0 4 2009-2010 _-0 C] i sM.CMF.,,,,„ , 4 J�� } ` Description of services provided J f 4:k.,,, The Colee Hammock neighborhood of Ft. Lauderdale \ --0 / /-.. can be characterized as both a hammock(South Florida L., 1 /� 4114 � highland forest)and an urban district.Founded in 1916, --- li i Colee Hammock is one of Broward County's oldest N• �.� / neighborhoods. It is also one of the most traditional - ', :'‘@®iik in terms of its urban form. A typical grid system of `"" g streets, sidewalks and alleyways combined with a `'' '..='"'...,,,°` rich mixture of housing types gives Colee Hammock its intimate character. This neighborhood acts as a gateway to the thriving Las Olas commercial corridor, ,,, 12;r the beaches, the downtown business district, the New ;;,',.; ",, z � u River and Himmarshee Canal. S+A was responsible CONMSCI.10.0 1 jj Mt.^RAa. for the proposal of a community vision and action g r . program that would bring about critical neighborhood ate. ,"�. ..improvements. The firm generated a master plan thatirr47; �`�divided the neighborhood in six districts.Street sections°"" I ' `® NI11 were created in order to examine the road and sidewalk i h,* 74r-A. �:' network of the area and recommend design principles g'' '~ Li=MC C1A that would organize the neighborhood.The master plan j]411.340, delineated and unified Colee Hammock aesthetically Qmr,",a iv+u Ir EAST BOW 8GL1EM DMI while preserving the area's rich mixture of housing types E XWGE and natural environment. Special emphasis was placed on the preservation of quality of life for the residents and II' '' , 't the historic nature of the community while also adapting 4'41:- °"�" 1ITRES ..44.1f5-4sr L to new lifestyles and neighborhood needs.The master i plan was adopted and implemented in 2010. Iltr ....4 414,1 L m;,,1.„ ® As,. ,.xmv ,�w y' , t„...,:4Reference contact info C«m.I Jaye Abbate, #/� ,(1 '^..",..A Colee Hammock Homeowners'Association President(former) =E . 1,-_ w._ T:954 683 91 59 " E:jabbate@artserve.org '' ,111i1111; RCM 51*CCa+G6W1;61RC'v s SE he 7,1171:611CT1 TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE North Beach Village Urban Dune `'' t Tactical Revitalization '; .* ' 4 44.4.,, -,k1lk ,:...74..:"k:11111111---- 66 North Beach, Fort Lauderdale .' Team name and roles t Shulman + Associates-Architectural Design & Urban \ ' ;Ii!1j; Design Consultant �, ,. ; �:��.' Year designed . ' r �� 2012 (ongoing) 4-�— Description of services provided * 00+".' . •' Located on the north side of Fort Lauderdale Beach,the i district comprises 18 blocks with about 200 apartment/ hotels. It was platted and developed after WW II and ' ---' exhibits a distinct postwar resort culture of two-story 111 Ikk, motels along broad avenues, bordered by abundant parking. After the 1980s, the neighborhood declined, ,t 44i ��, and recent development has emphasized mainly * t highrise oceanfront condominiums and hotels. ' Over the past 5 years,the client has acquired numerous \\ ----' * !1^ c properties and is now the dominant property owner / in the neighborhood. S+A worked with the client, the ` \ 'i. City and neighborhood groups to develop a vision for North Beach that spans from overall concept to project- "414 ..,000, fre) specific works. The work began with documentation and analysis. What developed was a master plan to - transform the neighborhood through a mix of building - r^' conservation, environmental restoration and innovative -� , . new building additions. S+A's proposed tactical ,r I ! E interventions, in service of this mission, were meant to provide a roadmap toward future policy development -=j' ,40 � and development strategies.This project was honored M�kujilitirO�p►' with a 2013 AIA Miami Design Award and a 2014 AIA '4Z ,�� (�!( Florida Honor Award of Excellence. 0 1 �" ,, mak. ( , "fl Reference contact info ' ' '`i�'' Karen Johnson T:(312)208 3191 L E:karen.johnson@pancapital.com _ -. e � ''''''''' ,11110.11. _. -. '. - ' ;11),.... [ti Mk Or Z'/0 lk 11 ' * I ,• S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB2 S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MiMo Railing Design Guidelines POST-WAR MODERN/ Mo Miami Beach wa►*� Agency name ,• City of Miami Beach, Planning Department � - . _ 1 Design -11 , Year Completed Guidlines0t4;‘ 2012 . .r 1•>I_"4.74.A Description of services provided Located on the north side of Fort Lauderdale Beach,the district comprises 18 blocks with about 200 apartment/ hotels. It was platted and developed after WW II and ii(ft exhibits a distinct postwar resort culture of two-story RAILINGS motels along broad avenues, bordered by abundant parking. After the 1980s, the neighborhood declined, and recent development has emphasized mainly highrise oceanfront condominiums and hotels. „ •�� , .� � .-. dads � �R Over the past 5 years,the client has acquired numerous ,„..,,.,b., properties and is now the dominant property owner in the neighborhood. S+A worked with the client, the City and neighborhood groups to develop a vision for North Beach that spans from overall concept to project- specific works. The work began with documentation STATEMENT OF PROBLEM and analysis. What developed was a master plan to transform the neighborhood through a mix of building • r conservation, environmental restoration and innovative "—"'�" `� --•*--w*• new building additions. S+A's proposed tactical interventions, in service of this mission, were meant to !ilium provide a roadmap toward future policy development " I and development strategies. This project was honored with a 2013 AIA Miami Design Award and a 2014 AIA milmoommi r°x Florida Honor Award of Excellence. Reference contact info Deborah Tackett DESIGN STRATEGIES ,°', .,....d.,,»....•.. T:305 673 7000 E:deborahtackett@miamibeachfl.gov MOM � .. . ce/ WW _, • TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Various Restoration,Alterations and/or Additions to Historic Structures Miami Beach ,, , F � t k....,....k.„ 1 -,t 4 _ „ M. r _ r . . '1 . . „ atik , - - M� R, t3 I 1433 Collins Ave Anglers Hotel Carlton Hotel client:Alan Lieberman client:Betsy Hotel 541 Lincoln Road 701 Lincoln Road 521 Lincoln Road Lincoln Theatre client:Comco&Forever2l client:David Edelstein client:Savitar Realty Advisors 41- , „..,.............. „,_, 111114411111 ::: ''.: fr`.?1,'itti M!rarf+.1p4 ,,, t , .''''', 610.: 4— ' E.*:".::-S,I., ----.. lk '� p ri'l s�,} -yes rv,aw xj,i � ,p�, It« ' 't .I ?� --- t "" -rte ,, . p ,,,,....I•• E'I 7 0 , ": 4";0,-,4 ',... 4' ,I,' -.,,,---- .... ,. a A iii -,... _ L` ,,, r,_ f–'-'-', ' ® pdA II +1 , I t , t k f d ie 1 3 t �,. A , ty 1 Itic ...........• 801 Lincoln Road 667 Lincoln Road 723 Lincoln Lane North 337 Lincoln Road client:Terranova Corporation client:Harvey Mattel client:Terranova Corporation client:Rand Real Estate 5+-A I ARUP DLAND 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM I TAB 2 S + A RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ii r 5_ ( i II V {;.r _ I� il. i n ' �1! t' �„ AdePV ''' , � isr_rme t. is i II. 11: 1Ii #irf!l Pott! _ , 3, 11 . .. _.1�.. - _ mss` ,u0=0-.4.,,-4.---- A ., ♦- _ ,����,- �.s._rte 425 Ocean Dtive 1751 Collins Avenue 1000-1030 Collins Avenue Savoy/Arlington Hotel South Seas Fairwind Hotel client:John Taft client:John Taft client:CG Fairwinds,LLC 1 (Lincoln Road 433 Lincoln Road 901 Lincoln Road Ritz-Carlton Dilido client:433 Lincoln Road LLC client:Koniver Stern client:McCann Inc. j ti if '- J .: :Zuminere4,'Lleitee, ' ed il ...., T 1iiittze, '.i ''S 'a - s-OP I tr. dIN; L - -; * u__, ..% , � ,.'� zAAR I. ..., .1 i 1 s'"' ' F ' 700b Lincoln Road 420 Lincolon Road client:Fritz's Skate Shop client:Gensler,Zara TAB 2 I 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2 . 2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 n Associates h lmu a Design, Architecture, Historic Preservation Allan Shulman Design & Historic Preservation Principal Hisham Suliman Architectural Project Manager Adam Breaux Michael Goodwin Project Designer Project Designer diandstucio RIAALucK WOW SE II0VERS Landscape Architecture and Water RAISE • RELOCATE"•"RESTORE Building Elevation Consultant Susannah C.Drake Landscape Principal Steven J.Hauck II Elevation Contractor Sandra Chuck Principal Erin Wythoff Landscape Designer TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ARUP Civil Engineering, Sustainability, Coastal Engineering, Hydrology/Geologist, Geotechnical and Project Cost Estimator Vincent Lee Civil Engineer 1 Lisa C.Dickson Amy Leitch Sanjeev Malhotra Ian Buckley Director of Resilience Sustainability Consultant Geotechnical Engineer Structural/Civil Engineer Aihua Tang Adam Finkin Matt Jackson Water Resources Engineer Cost Engineering Structural Engineer Hydrology/Geologist Coastal Engineer MCE Structural Engineering Youssef Hachem Structural Engineer Principal COASTAL 4/P 4100' 1 SYSTEMS Civil, Coastal Engineering, Geotechnical Harvey Sasso Civil Engineer, Principal Adriana Cabrera Orestes Betancourt Sibtey Hasan Andres Perez Liliane Smatt Environmental Engineer Senior Civil Designer Senior Coastal Engineer Engineering Dept. Head Project Manager S+A I ARUP I OLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP Civil Engineering, Sustainability, Coastal Engineering, Hydrology/Geologist, Geotechnical and Project Cost Estimator Founded in 1946, ARUP is the creative force at the Relevant Experience heart of many of the world's most prominent projects in the built environment.We offer an unusual breadth Resiliency Planning of professional services that combine to make a real C40 Cities difference to our clients and the communities in which Cedar Rapids we work. Clinton Climate Initiative NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program With 90 offices in 35 countries, we are truly global. NYC Housing Recovery Program Our multidisciplinary staff of engineers, designers and NYS2100 Commission planners is 11,000 strong and dedicated to delivering Rebuild By Design innovative, forward-thinking projects that embody our Rockefeller Foundation - 100 Resilient Cities ethics and reflect our passion for design.The structure, Rockefeller Foundation -Asian Cities Climate Change size and spread within ARUP make us unique in our Resilience Network ability to bring to bear the latest thinking from anywhere around the world to our clients. Resilient Building Design Brooklyn Navy Yard Tower Employees, not anonymous shareholders, own ARUP. NYCHA Red Hook Houses By giving our people a personal stake in the firm's success we have created a uniquely collaborative culture Historic Building Design that stresses the importance of personal accountability Pier A- Battery Park City and intellectual agility.Wherever we operate, we focus Fulton Center-Corbin Building on our clients. We are committed to delivering elegant and innovative solutions by working in partnership with Waterfront Design clients to help them meet the demands and aspirations East River Waterfront Esplanade and Piers of their customers and stakeholders. Hudson River Park Local Experience Miami Science Museum, SMEP/Civil Norris Cut Tunnel, Geotech Perez Art Museum Miami, SMEP PortMiami Tunnel Access Improvements - Geotech S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Vincent Lee, PE, LEED AP, ENV SP Vincent Lee is an Associate Principal in Arup's New York office with a wide range of experience in sustainable site development, green infrastructure and water management.While serving as t project manager and lead design engineer on a number of high- profile multidisciplinary projects worldwide,Vincent offers his clients a comprehensive understanding of delivering sustainable and resilient infrastructure while overcoming a diversity of complex and context-sensitive challenges. Vincent has applied his civil engineering and sustainable design Profession experience to several Post-Sandy response projects from policy to Civil Engineer construction across varying typologies of the built environment. Current Position He is knowledgeable in assessing the hazards to infrastructure Associate Principal posed by climate change and disaster risk and has advised on Arup resilience and adaptation strategies to mitigate the risk.His recent Joined06 Joresilience involvement in the New York metropolitan area include the NYS2100 Commission,NYCDOT and MTA NYCT post- Years of Experience Sandy resilience work,HUD Rebuild By Design(Jersey Shore), 18+ the NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program(Long Island) Qualifications and NYCHA Red Hook Houses. MS,Civil Engineering,2002,New Jersey Institute of Technology BS,Civil Engineering,1998, Vincent has collaborated closelywith his clients to find creative Pennsylvania State University Minor,Environmental Engineering and context-sensitive solutions while still achieving high 1998,Pennsylvania State performance objectives of the project. University PE,State of Illinois,New Jersey, New York Rebuild By Design USGBC LEED AP,2006 ISI ENV SP,2013 Rebuild by Design,an initiative of the Superstorm Sandy University of Cambridge Rebuilding Task Force and HUD,is aimed at addressing Programme for Sustainability structural and environmental vulnerabilities that Hurricane Sandy Leadership,2011 exposed in communities throughout the region and developing University College London Smart fundable solutions to better protect residents from future climate Cities Programme,2014 events.Vincent was the lead civil engineer supporting the Sasaki Professional Associations team who were one of the ten participating design teams as part Member,American Society of of the process. Civil Engineers(ASCE),2004- Present NYCHA Baruch Houses,New York,NY Young Leader,Urban Land Lead civil engineer for the schematic design(ULD,2005-2006 g of the infrastructure Member,U.S.Green Building upgrades for the NYCHA Baruch Houses as part of their Post- Council(USGBC),2006-Present Sandy resiliency initiatives.The work involved relocating site Member,International Water utilities to coordinate with the new energy(and CHP)strategy Association(IWA),2008-Present and designing stormwater management systems to reduce runoff. Member,New York Water Environment Association NYCHA Red Hook Houses,Brooklyn,NY (NYWEA),2012-Present Vincent is leading the water resilience strategy and engineering Committees design for the redevelopment of 33 public housing buildings in Member,ASCE Land Use Red Hook,NY.The buildingswere severelyimpacted Committee,Transportation& by Hurricane Sandy which destroyed all the MEP equipment in the www.anip.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RESUMES Ian Buckley, CEng Ian Buckley has over 25 years of experience and has had responsibility for design and project management on a range of building projects with associated infrastructure development. He previously ran the North Wales building structures team,and was technical reviewer for the group. Ian's experience is broadly based and covers a range of building materials and form. Examples include reinforced concrete and steel framed buildings,early iron framed buildings, loadbearing stone,masonry and terracotta structures,timber structures, Profession underground structures,highway structures,aluminum and Structural/Civil Engineer stainless steel structures,road construction and drainage design. Current Position Ian has managed a number of large international projects,and is Associate Principal experience in delivering projects to a wide range of International Joined Arup Codes and Standards within a variety of traditional,design build 1997 and partnering frameworks. Years of Experience Since relocating to the US in 2007 Ian has begun to particularly 25 specialize in the delivery of Historic Building projects together Qualifications with the Adaptive Re-use of existing buildings,and has worked MEng,Civil Engineering with on several Award winning projects in this field. Architecture,University of Leeds, 1988 BEd,Mathematics, 1991 CEng,UK Ian has a keen interest in critical aesthetic detailing within Professional Associations structural design,and works closely with architects to deliver Member,Institution of Structural integrated building solutions. Engineers Publications Renovation of the Historic Corbin Corbin Building,Fulton Center,New York,NY Buildings,IABSE Package Manager for the refurbishment and adaptive reuse of this Cast Iron Brackets,a Historic and early cast-iron framed office building located in downtown New Contemporary Study,APTI York City.The project features refurbishment and adaptive reuse of an historic early skyscraper building which features a stone, brickwork and decorative terracotta facade.The building was originally constructed in 1888 and is on the National Register of Historic Properties. In the final condition the Corbin Building links and connects passenger access between the subway and new transit hub by way of a deep escalator through the existing building,as well as accommodating new office space,and providing street level retail units. The building was successfully Landmarked as part of the project,as a result of detailed research and field investigation work carried out by the design team. The project has received multiple Architectural and Engineering Awards. TWA Hotel,JFK Airport,NY Structural Engineer for the sensitive conversion of the Landmarked Saarinen TWA Flight Center Building into a five star hotel and conference center. Working with specialist Historic www.arup.com ARU P S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Aihua Tang, PhD, PE, ENV SP, CFM, QSD, QSP Aihua Tang is an associate and senior water resources engineer with Amp in San Francisco.Her expertise is in hydrology and hydraulics computer modeling,including river system 1-D and 2- D modeling,flood mitigation unsteady state flow modeling, • bridge hydraulics and scour analysis,dam break modeling,city- »s wide water distribution system modeling,sanitary sewer system Ito' modeling and surge analyses for new pump stations and transmission lines. She has been responsible for many flood control studies,drainage Profession design projects and water and waste water projects,including Water Resources Engineering flood mitigation study,floodplain delineations study,bridge Current Position hydraulics and scour analysis,sedimentation modeling,onsite and Associate offsite drainage designs,bank protection designs,water main and Senior Water Resources Engineer sewer line design,booster pump station design,zone split pressure reducing valve system design,surge analysis and surge Joined Arup control system design,concrete clarifier and piping system 2012 design. Years of Experience 17 Qualifications Aihua is experienced in comprehensive computer modeling to PhD,Water Resources solve complicated problems.Her water engineering expertise Engineering,Arizona State University, 1997 ranges from study,design to construction management. MEng,Civil Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,China, 1984 BART Livermore Extension Hydraulic Analysis BEng,Hydraulic Engineering, Senior Engineer for analysis of channel and 2D floodplain Hefei University of Technology, g y p China, 1982 hydraulics along Arroyo Las Positas and Cayetano Creek in PE(Civil),State of California, relation to the existing conditions and potential changes due to the Arizona BLVX project.The study used a coupled 1 D/2D hydraulic model ASFPM Certified Floodplain developed using HEC-RAS. Manager(CFM),US-07-03054 1ST Envision Sustainability Concord Reuse Project Area Plan,Concord,CA Professional Credential(ENV SP) Qualified SWPPP Developer Senior Engineer who performed water system modeling to (QSD)and Qualified SWPPP evaluate the proposed water distribution system under varies Practitioner(QSP),Certificate scenarios including average daily demand,maximum day #25144 demand,and maximum day demand with fire demand of 3000 Publications gpm at two different locations.This water system will supply the Co-authored with L.Mays; proposed Concord Reuse Area with two major pump station and Genetic Algorithms for Optimal storage tank systems,and connect the existing water systems Operation of Soil Aquifer supplyingthe areas at five locations. The modelingwas Treatment System,Water vicinity Resources Management,Kluwer performed using EPANET 2.0. Academic Publishers,The Netherlands, 1999. 4th Street Improvement Project,City of Flagstaff,AZ* Co-authored with L.Mays; Senior drainage engineer performed hydraulic modeling and Optimal Operation of Soil Aquifer Treatment System Under floodplain delineation for this project based on the 4th Street and Uncertainty Using Genetic Huntington Drive realignment improvements,new culverts and a Algorithms,Proceedings of the new site development based on fill construction.Tasks also 26th Annual Water Resources included preparation of floodplain revision annotation map, Planning and Management www.arup.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RESUMES Amy Leitch, LEED AP BD+C Amy is a Senior Consultant with Amp's International Development team specializing in the strategic and technical • aspects of sustainable and resilient design and planning within the built environment. With an academic and professional background in sustainability and climate change,Amy's projects have spanned the globe in developing integrated technical and strategic responses for building and infrastructure design,urban planning and policy,and corporate responsibility projects. Amy has a particular affinity for developing relevant key Profession performance indicators for city resilience,from a single building Sustainability Consultant scale to city-wide development. Her experience includes Current Position identification of city best practices and benchmarking Senior Sustainability Consultant performance across urban systems. Joined Arup Prior to joining Arup,Amy managed the Americas research 2008 program for The Climate Group,a global not-for-profit dedicated Years of Experience to accelerating corporate and government commitment on climate 11 change with a focus on the built environment. Qualifications MA,Environmental Management, Duke University,2005 Amy specializes in the strategic and policy aspects of sustainable BA,Environmental Studies and resilience planning within the built environment. (Environmental Policy and Economics),Wellesley College, 2003 LEED AP BD+C Certified in Basics of City Resilience Index City Challenge,Rockefeller Foundation Organizational GHG Accounting, Leading the North American city engagement and training The GHG Management Institute program to directly support the first users of the CRI Online Tool Professional Associations to complete a self-assessment using the CRI to assess and Member,US Green Building measure their present-day performance and also assess their Council New York Chapter trajectory towards a more resilient future.Coordinating with the Speaking city team leaders and 100RC to support city assessment efforts, "Advancing city adaptation and leadingstaff from multiple regional offices. This work builds monitoring,evaluation and mupe reporting".Adaptation Futures on work previously undertaken by Amp with support from the 2016.Rotterdam,The Netherlands, Rockefeller Foundation to develop the City Resilience Index. May 11,2016. "Resilience for the Long Term". C40 Climate Risk and Adaptation Framework and Taxonomy Yale University School of Led a team in the research and development of a common Architecture Coastal Adaptation p Seminar.January 17,2013. framework will enable cities to perform robust and consistent "Mining'the built environment:an reporting of experiences of climate hazards and impacts,climate ecosystem services approach to adaptation planning and implementation as part of their urban resilience".Adaptation compliance under the Compact of Mayors.The Climate Risk and Futures 2012.Tucson,Arizona, May 30,2012. Adaptation Framework and Taxonomy(CRAFT)provides cities Publications and their partners with insight into whether cities are carrying out Includes research,writing and a good quality planning process and how this is being translated editing support for: into action.CRAFT builds on previous work undertaken by Amp Arup/Rockefeller Foundation and C40 to develop a structured description of the key climate (2016)Measuring City Resilience. hazards that cities face. www.arup.can ARU P S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Matt Jackson, PE, SE, LEED AP Matt is an Associate Principal and Structural Engineer in Arup's New York office. He has been responsible for the analysis, +' design,detailing and construction administration for a wide-range of projects,ranging from high-rise buildings to museums and sports facilities. Matt has broad experience in steel,reinforced concrete,and other construction types in North America,and around the world. Matt leads the structural design of many technically challenging and innovative projects,with a particular focus on geometrically Profession complex projects and high-rise design. Structural Engineer Matt's work has also included a number of existing building Current Position evaluation and modification projects,both for change of use and Associate Principal for broader projects to improve resilience. This work draws on his Joined Arup experience in areas of high seismic,high wind,or flood risk,and 1997 his multidisciplinary background,to bring together pragmatic Years of Experience solutions that address the needs of owners of existing buildings. 20 Qualifications M.Eng.,M.A.,Civil&Structural Matt brings a wide range of experience to every project,and Engineering,Emmanuel College, has a proven record of working with the team to find efficient Cambridge,UK and creative structural solutions for every design. PE,State of California,Texas, New York,Montana,Georgia, Oklahoma Structural Engineer,State of New York City Housing Recovery Office,New York,NY California Lead Structural Engineer for a project assisting the Housing LEED AP Recovery Office to develop standards for upgrading and Professional Associations rebuilding NYC's housing stock damaged by Hurricane Sandy. Member,Structural Engineers The Housing Recovery Office is a multi agency task force Association of New York including the department of buildings,NYC Planning and FEMA, Publications together with external consultants.The project includes "Pedestrian Excitation on the evaluation of typical damaged housing types,application of London Millennium Footbridge" specific retrofit strategies appropriate to the local conditions,and Proceedings of the ASCE SEI Structures Congress,New York, working with the agencies to adapt and develop their standards to NY,April 2005. aid the recovery. "A New Slant"The Denver Art Museum Expansion,Modern Steel New York City Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Construction,April 2007. Resiliency "The effects of Complex Geometry Structural Engineer fora project to developcost models for on Tall Towers"Structural Design gp 1 of Tall and Special Buildings, typical retrofit strategies for non-residential building stock Volume 16 Issue 4-December throughout flood prone areas of New York City,to support the 2007 Mayor's Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency. "'Viscous Dampers Come of Age' A new method for Achieving Brooklyn Navy Yard Tower,Brooklyn,NY Economy in tall buildings", Structure Magazine,June 2008. Project Director for a new 500,000ft2 commercial development "Increasing Efficiency in Tall located between dry docks 2 and 3 in the Brooklyn Navy Yards. Buildings by Damping" Currently in the construction documents phase. Proceedings ASCE SEI Structures Congress,Orlando,FL,May 2010. www.arup.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RESUMES Sanjeev Malhotra, PE, GE lok Sanjeev Malhotra has 25 years of experience ranging from geotechnical investigations,analyses,and design to field 1► e ' monitoring,and construction support. By virtue of his education in geotechnical engineering,tunneling,and his varied experience Sanjeev is uniquely qualified to provide geotechnical consulting M. .,.. services on a variety of projects. Sanjeev has managed,and led onshore and offshore geotechnical engineering investigations,spearheaded analyses and design efforts,and prepared plans,specifications,and cost estimates,and Profession provided support during construction for projects,such as light- Geotechnical Engineer rail/transit,both above ground and underground;transportation Current Position corridors,airport facilities,marine facilities,wind turbine farms, Associate Principal and residential land development projects.Sanjeev offers consulting services in foundation engineering in a variety of soil Joined Arup conditions,soil-structure interaction problems,landslide 2013 stabilization,slope stability,settlement problems,foundation Years of Experience analyses,tunneling,seismic hazards analyses and liquefaction 25 evaluation studies. Qualifications Master of Advanced Studies in Tunneling,aborarRock Mechanics Foundation Designand Construction;DeepFoundations; Laboratory,Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,Lausanne, Retaining Structures;Braced Excavations; Slope Stability; Switzerland,2010 Ground Movement;Pile Load Testing MBA,General Management and Finance,Leonard N.Stern School of Business,New York University, New York,2003 Pier 26,Hudson River Water Front,New York MS,Civil Engineering with As geotechnical engineer,assessed the suitability of existing 24- emphasis on Offshore Pile inch square concrete pile foundations supporting a 841 ft long and Foundations,University of Texas, 120 ft to 223 ft widepier to accommodate heavier buildingloads, Austin,Texas,1991 BEng,(1st Class with Honors), using wave equation analyses to back-calculate the axial pile Civil Engineering,Victoria Jubilee capacity from the pile driving records. The existing pier was built Technical Institute,University of in 2008 and 2009 as a part of the Hudson River Park Bombay,Bombay,India,1989 Redevelopment. It is aligned roughly east-west and consists of an GeotechnicalCaliforniaGEngineer,OregonStatof 841 ft longstructure supported on 29pile supported bents. The aliornia(G2467); PPo PPo (81418) pier is 223 ft wide for a distance of 150 ft from the existing Professional Engineer,State of bulkhead line and narrows down to 120 ft for the remainder 691 ft California(C51678),Oregon extending into the Hudson. The Hudson River Park Trust is (81418),Washington(044008), consideringvarious additions,which will impose greater loads on New York(078108),NorthPo Carolina(37196),Virginia the foundation than currently present.(2015) (0402054142),Florida(78231) Professional Associations SR 874,Miami-Dade Expressway Miami-Dade Expressway Member,American Society of Authority,Miami,FL Civil Engineers,1994;Associate Supervising geotechnical engineer provided geotechnical support Member,Institution of Engineers during construction of the northbound on-ramp from Kendall (India),1997 Drive and re-alignment of the existing eastbound on-ramp to SR Member,Geo-Institute 878. The new on-ramp consists of a twin steel box girder bridge Sol Member,c InternationalcsnGeotechnical Society of supported bytenpiers and two end bents supported each on four Soil Mechanics and uPPo PPo Engineering(ISSMGE) 36-inch-diameter(0.9-meter-diameter)drilled shafts founded in www.arup.comARUP S+A ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Adam Finkin, CPE, LEED AP Adam Finkin is a Senior Cost Engineering Analyst in the San Francisco office.Adam has experience in construction management,cost estimating,cost planning,cash flow projections,scheduling,value engineering,risk management,risk analysis,and life cycle cost analysis. Adam has been a key member of the Amp teams for both buildings and infrastructure projects throughout the Americas. Several key projects include the Tappan Zee Bridge Replacement, Mexico City Airport and Terminal,Confidential Campuses in the Profession Bay Area,the New Bridge Saint Lawrence,Goethals Bridge P3, Cost Engineering Presidio Parkway P3(Doyle Drive),California High Speed Rail, Current Position and the Deep Underground Science Engineering Laboratory in Senior Analyst South Dakota.Adam has performed Lender's Technical Advisory Joined Arup roles specific to CAPEX and OPEX analysis,project due 07 Jo 2oin diligence,schedule generation,and risk analysis. Years of Experience Adam also has experience in business administration,finance, 10 financial modeling,and is project manager for an Arup DTF Qualifications research project studying the integration of BIM and cost BA,State University of New York analysis,as well as an effort in collaboration with UC Berkeley at Albany and U Washington studying project delivery methods and Certificate in Construction transaction costs. Management, UC Berkeley Extension Certified Professional Estimator American Society of Professional With a focus on cost estimating,cost planning,scheduling,risk, Estimators and construction management Adam's strong leadership LEED Accredited Professional qualities and technical skills bring value to any project. Professional Associations Member,American Society of Professional Estimators Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency,New York, Publications NY A.Finkin,L.Scammell,B. Developed a series of scalable construction cost estimates for Maddex,M.Roche.Cost repair and retrofit of multiple building types-industrial, Engineering for Mega-Project's, Design-Build,and The Tappan Zee commercial and residential-throughout New York City as part Hudson River Crossing.Bridge efforts to strengthen NYC's resiliency in new post Hurricane Engineering Association(BEA)7th Sandy flood zones. NYC Bridge Conference Manhattan,NY Aug 2013 Housing Recovery Operations(HRO),New York,NY Research Developed a series of scalable construction cost estimates for Transaction Costs through an repair and retrofit scenarios for residential housingthroughout Evaluation of Design-Build and p Design-Bid-Build in the public New York areas affected by post-tropical storm Sandy. sector.Joint effort with UC Berkeley and U Washington. NYCDOT Engineering Services Agreement(ESA),New York, Internal Arup BIM 3D,4D,and 5D NY integration study Developed construction cost estimates for repair scenarios for New York areas affected by post-tropical storm Sandy focusing on infrastructure and transportation networks The I-4 Ultimate Project(HOT),FL wwwarup.com ARU P TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RESUMES Lisa C. Dickson, PG Lisa Dickson is an Associate Principal in Arup's Boston office with expertise in climate risk and resiliency. She was a contributor to the World Resource Institute's 2010 Public Sector GHG Protocol and aided in the development of the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure's(ISI)project rating system. In 2010, she was invited to Shanghai to comment on China's 12th 5-Year Plan and present on the use of carbon markets to drive investment within the transportation sector. i f Lisa has led multiple climate change projects including work for Profession the City of Boston,Washington DC,City of Cambridge, Director of Resilience,Arup Massachusetts,the Army National Guard, Logan International Americas Airport,several coastal municipalities,in addition to her current Current Position work with Partners Healthcare and NJ American Water. She has Associate Principal been invited to the Pentagon and National Guard Headquarters in Joined Arup DC to advise them on her work related to climate security. 2015 Years of Experience 20 Lisa has expertise in translating the risk of climate change into Qualifications resilient solutions within the built,social,public health and MS,Geological Sciences, natural environments,including economic considerations. University of Michigan, 1994 BA,Geology-Biology,Colby College, 1992 World Bank Incorporating Climate Adaptation Risks to Professional Geologist(PG): Performance Based Contracting,Worldwide Maine,GE428 Project Director for the development of performance-based GRI Sustainability Reporting metrics for climate risk for the World Bank. Amp is working to Certification ascribe market value to climate risk,and to ensure the Professional Associations transparency and ownership of climate risk throughout project life Society of American Military Engineers cycle and assets. Committees Climate Change Adaptation Plan,District Department of the Infrastructure and Climate Environment,Washington,DC* Network(NSF-funded project through University of New Principal-in-charge for the climate,vulnerability and risk Hampshire) assessments.This plan will inform the District of its key climate Resilient,Sustainable,multi- risks in an effort to integrate resiliency into planning for capital hazard building design—Advisory improvements,policies,and programs.The final product will Board h Virginia Tech)project include both short-and long-term adaptation strategies that will through Virginia g- P g Subcommittee on Adaptation for leverage synergies with Sustainable DC initiatives. MA Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Disaster and Infrastructure Resiliency Plan,Logan MA Climate Change Adaptation International Airport and Maritime,Boston,MA* Coalition Project manager for this comprehensive vulnerability and Awards resiliency plan for Boston Logan Airport and the Massport ACEC Silver Award,Massport maritime facilities to provide an understanding of overall climate Disaster and Infrastructure vulnerability,that included prioritizing risk and developing a Resiliency Plan,2015 Woman to Watch,2010 range of adaptation strategies,including associated costs,required Special Service Award for to build resiliency within the system. Augusta's(ME)Comprehensive www.arup.com ARU P S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 100 Resilient Cities Agenda Setting Workshops various a locations pM . "" j - .. 1 v , . - tv-t3 ,i $ l I .446... .. 01 Alt!, .. .} +� a 1 air i' „� f it pF. r • , i i1Al1119 '116�11llilll, +j+'�. Client 100 Resilient Cities(launched by Arup led the design and delivery of three of the first 100 The Rockefeller Foundation) Resilient Cities Agenda Setting Workshops,providing the Key collaborators first opportunity for dialogue on urban resilience between City Councils in Byblos,Bristol, city stakeholders and the 100RC team. Glasgow Key facts 100 Resilient Cities gives 100 cities The 100RC Agenda Setting Workshops aimed to establish a the chance to receive technical common understanding of resilience for each city,in line with support and resources to improve 100RC's vision for more resilient cities.Arup worked directly with their urban resilience over three the cities'leaders to bring together stakeholders from the public, years.Byblos,Bristol and Glasgow selected from nearly 400 city private and third sectors and celebrate their existing strengths in applicants across six continents. urban resilience whilst addressing broad challenges,from flooding and climate change to economic deprivation and transport planning. The workshops are designed to start the conversation around creating The workshops encouraged participants to strengthen existing and implementing a resilience plan relationships and foster new partnerships to drive coordination and and hiring a Chief Resilience Officer boost the cities'overall response capacity.Arup also produced a to oversee the resilience strategy. post-event report assessing the success of the workshops,lessons Key services provided learned and next steps. Energy consulting,environmental services. 235463-00 www.arup.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE NYS 2100 Commission ;5 ta i'VP"";r ..i:,.. =w p• xt ux"w n'K9w t. . „ ; "ais wq Ned o-fi, y d"' '` Si 7t^",»�^'WrC ':`" .$ t . I f( 1 "tlit`... Y._y. y�yy''N� y;4 e.„ Client Rockefeller Foundation Project owner I have charged[the NYS 2100 Commission]to present a New York State comprehensive blueprint so we can bring our emergency preparedness and response capabilities into the 21st century. Key facts Recommendations to improve the strength and resilience of New York State's infrastructure Governor Cuomo Key services provided Arup received a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation to assist Project management in the preparation of the NYS 2100 Commission report.NYS Technical research,analysis,and 2100 was one of four commissions announced by Governor advisory in transportation,energy, Cuomo in response to the recent,severe weather events landfrs ruuse,insurance,efinand experienced byNew York State and the surrounding region.The infrastructure finance P g $ Geographical information systems Governor asked the Commission to examine and evaluate key Graphic design vulnerabilities in the State's critical infrastructure systems and to recommend actions that should be taken to strengthen and improve their resilience.Arup's work included project management of the five technical areas of transportation,land use,energy,insurance,and infrastructure finance,as well as overall project management.Amp also carried out research and analysis to support and develop the recommendations. www.arup.com ARUP S+A I ARUP(DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 C40 Cities Climate Leadership Program Climate Action in Megacities: C40 Cities Baseline and Opportunities Verelan t0 June 2011 • O - ==1 O. 1=1= O • © • Client C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group Arup's technical expertise and sustainable integrated Clinton Climate Initative thinking is helping C40 to meet its potential to mitigate Key facts and adapt to the climate change challenge. Research and authorship of the report"Climate Action in Megacities" Provide focused technical expertise Arup has provided a range of strategic and technical services for to six cities through UrbanLife the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group.In May 2009,Arup workshops was appointed as a Strategic Advisor to the C40 and its partner, Provithe Chairmanhe ongoiof sthe C40 advice to the Clinton Climate Initiative,for twoyears.Duringthis time the of the C40 Comprehensive analysis of mayoral Arup convened six action-oriented workshops in key cities action of member cities to tackle around the world. climate change The C40 also commissioned Arup to co-author the Climate Key services provided Action in Megacities: C40 Cities Baseline and Opportunities Sustainability consulting report.A team of 46 Arup researchers collected a data set for 36 cities through a mixture of desktop research,existing knowledge and experience,and interviews/meetings with City Officials. Presented in 2011 at the C40 Cities Mayors Summit in Sao Paulo,Brazil,the groundbreaking report provides the world's largest cities with a baseline for progress on climate change. .aNP. , ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Framework and Neighborhood Planning, Cedar Rapids, Iowa park _ ,..�, f' ,►, 191 1 fd >fi in:S't l s / F AVIMUlt rH$Op N i 'i� ‘4.' mivaore • WNW :1IC' '.Mile 11 11P 41, 240 .101 y, . aT ."4 jt • § ^-� aa" Tiyla `.,, s t i r rmit 11111, Y °yt j i !v" ..0": ._ rc..ON2U Client Sasaki Associates,Inc. Project owner This is the first time Amp evaluated the sustainability City of Cedar Rapids performance of an existing city in the United States. Key facts Inspired by severe flooding Sustainability masterplan Completed 2008 In June 2008,Cedar Rapids,Iowa was badly damaged by Key services provided flooding from heavy rains that caused the Cedar River to Sustainability consulting overflow beyond the 500-year flood plain.More than 7,000 homes,hundreds of businesses,community facilities and infrastructure were damaged or destroyed.Amp worked with the team to develop a series of plans to respond to the disaster. The team,with significant community input,created plans including a Framework for Reinvestment and Revitalization,a series of Sustainable Neighborhood Plans for each of the affected areas and an overall Sustainability Plan for the City.Amp also developed a Sustainability Assessment Matrix booklet for the design team to provide preliminary guidance on integrating practical,actionable strategies into the planning process. www arup corn ARUP S.A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Baruch Housing Retrofits and Resiliency Upgrades, NY , , itat , i. f ,. • , . -. R • rte'a qPri ice'9&. ,,, ./, ' 1114. PR*i" .'4',,,,. r h.i• , r'" ae I _i fit a1:R.Aa1/a,\ ,,„ 11(/11FS � .. �."w. Client Nelligan White Architects Project owner Arup is working with a team to develop a plan to make the New York City Housing Authority development more resistant to future catastrophes. Key facts Development located in Zone A Key services provided Baruch Houses is the largest public housing developments in Structural, electrical, and plumbing engineering Manhattan.In 2012's Superstorm Sandy,it suffered significant Civil engineering flood related damage during and following the storm surges. Acoustic consulting Many residents were stranded without water and power for several days after the storm. Arup is focused reviewing the various options to upgrade the buildings,increase their efficiency and review the site wide opportunities for heat,domestic hot water,and emergency power production,including the possibility of co-generation building energy performance. Arup is also analyzing how to make its water supply more resilient as well as reviewing flood interventions to reduce the extent of potential surges on the low lying buildings. WWW.arup.COM ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLANO ARUP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE NYC Office of Housing Recovery Operations Support lilt" Replace and relocate mechanical r p V equipment to above design flood elevation I > a Relocate electrical equipment to above the design flood elevation iirljd 1 I Dry floodproof all walls to 1' '1111111 > above design Rood elevation ter _ 1 i 6rstail floodpronf door and floodproof windows to_abo d.,,Gn flood elevation(refer to the toolbox in the\poen,.for more details) Z � _ Install sump p 'p ", a ® \` Fill in basement per FEMA guidelines a.. --- --- -_ • t) Client New York City Office of Housing Recovery Operations Through extensive design analysis of 15 building Federal Emergency Management typologies,Arup is helping assist flood-prone property Agency owners rebuild better,stronger,and more resilient housing. Key collaborators AECOM Architecture Research Office ATCS,PLC New York City created the Mayor's Office of Housing Recovery Boston Consulting Group Operations(HRO)to assist property owners rebuild better, stronger,and more resilient housing throughout the City after Key facts Hurricane Sandy,Arup was hired to provide support to HRO to New flood elevation maps created identify issues and challenges associated with rebuilding and Hurricane Hucane Sandy show that the number of residential buildings at retrofitting properties to withstand flood events.To this end,Arup risk more than doubled from over led a design analysis including the following:geographic 25,000 to over 56,000 analyses to identify the quantity and characteristics of the Key services provided residential buildings in the new flood elevation zone;design Structural,mechanical,electrical, analyses for 15 housing typologies,along with a toolkit of retrofit and plumbing engineering strategies to help owners protect their buildings against future Civil engineering storm events,complying with FEMA standards;and cost Cost estimating estimates for upgrades to understand the financial implications of Sustainability consulting implementing resiliency design standards. Transport planning www.arup.com ARUP S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN) CC M a ii 1"---i' - . l 0. Z COw i/ \41kc.) VP �, �' _ 4 ��, Change Q` t I. SUPPORTED BY . THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION i (���� a 7 idM. w Ili , .__. _ Client Rockefeller Foundation Key services provided Arup is helping to initialize and implement interventions Environmental consultancy by facilitating networking and shared learning within and Project management between partner cities. Planning Infrastructure Governance In 2008 the Rockefeller Foundation embarked on a major climate Reporting change initiative that concentrates on building the resilience of Asian cities to today's changing environment.Arup was selected by the Rockefeller Foundation to provide program management services for a component of this initiative that focuses on catalyze attention,funding,and action to build climate change resilience Asian cities—The Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Initiative.The initiative aims to assist lower income residents by creating robust models and methodologies for assessing and addressing risk through active engagement and analysis of various cities. Arup will focus attention on capacity building and coordination, climate change adaptation and environmental consultancy, planning,infrastructure and governance. www.arup.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program • as— k m ., 731 _ lit aM M • - Client p, Governor's Office of Storm Recovery Arup's leadership in coastal resiliency and long-range Key collaborators planning assisted local stakeholders in making tough Sasaki Associates decisions about the future of their communities. Key facts Planning,engineering,and outreach services for five Long Island This community-based,comprehensive planning process communities to identify reconstruction projects and included community visioning,asset and risk assessment,a needs activities following Superstorm and opportunities analysis,strategies for long-term resiliency, Sandy and the development and refinement of capital projects for Key services provided potential funding. Civil engineering Energy consulting Arup's primary role was to act as project manager throughout the Resiliency planning process,and to serve as the technical liaison between Urban planning the Governor's Office of Storm Recovery and affected Water engineering community members.The nine-month process resulted in five Community Reconstruction Plans with recommendations in the Selected awards areas of infrastructure,housing,economic development,natural ACEC New York,Engineering and cultural resources,and community planning and capacity Excellence Award,Gold,2015 building.They also included a detailed list of projects that are proposed for federal funding. www.arup.com ARUP 5+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Perez Art Museum Miami, Museum Park, FL �{ it i 11 -,., .. , a _ i ►yin , lanl 1p. iliiirbi_�. .-- -aancu�°i -_ _ ! / ` :. 40. dN r f/ .,, f ,'" f • rt. "` .. 1'- Via:" .. a r� 'k,,,,,, Client Miami Art Museum Paratus Group The museum's a long-span column-free gallery spaces Key collaboratorshave been designed to resist hurricane loads while Herzog&de Merron maintaining the aesthetic architectural concrete. Handel Architects Key facts 125,000ft2 new facility The new Miami Art Museum will be an anchor of the 29-acre Adjacent to the new Miami Science Museum Park,a redeveloped downtown waterfront that will Museum provide a vibrant mix of green space and cultural offerings. Set LEED Gold certification on a raised podium and under a broad canopy,the museum will Key services provided include Class 1 fine art gallery space,a museum shop,bistro, Structural,mechanical,and auditorium and additional visitor facilities. electrical engineering Fire/life safety consulting The building represents materials manipulation at its finest,with IT and communications consulting architectural and structural concrete melding to form a plastic LEED consulting union of textural expression.The overhead canopy forms a Lighting design dramatic capstone to the building,providing shading even from the punishing winter sun while tempering the natural daylighting in the interior galleries.Vertical hanging gardens and lush landscaping provide an exterior articulation of life from an otherwise imposing façade. www.arup.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I BLAND ARUP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Miami Science Museum, Miami, FL - 4 _ -w- fl1flhIIJ41! V' 11 1 4 ` S1SS1(; t * jS \1 � 1( < ( < 11 '1,,^ nil/ ° Ff (<40-41 44(4,* t a l • B <,<(<l ,<,, ( `o, • • Client Miami Science Museum Key collaboratorsArup offered an economical and buildable solution for the Grimshaw Architects innovative 500,000-gallon gulf stream tank,which is the focal point of the museum design Key facts 180,000ft2 facility 500,000-gallon aquarium tank $160m construction cost The new Science Museum is being built next to the Perez Art Scheduled to open 2015 Museum on Bicentennial Park in Miami,and will include general Key services provided science and significant aquarium exhibits.The centerpiece is a Structural,mechanical,electrical, 500,000-gallon gulf stream aquarium tank.The center will also and plumbing engineering include tropical coral reefs,large tanks for sharks and rays,a Civil engineering rooftop observatory,and a 300-seat planetarium sphere and Acoustic consulting parking structure underneath building. Architectural lighting design The design for the tank is an inclined cone sliced horizontally at Audiovisual consulting the top and on a diagonal at the bottom.It is envisioned that at Fagade engineering least a portion if not the entire top of the tank will be open and Fire life safety consulting the water surface will be exposed to external elements. IT and communications consulting Security consulting Venue consulting ,wu,u,.a�up.com ARUP S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 PortMiami Tunnel Access Improvements, Miami, FL v --°r. I / • a / /1)111 , o r° :. • if �� i01 ' rn �, le * r, w+ +' -.� , _ _..... ' ''',/ 4o" n . ill lir n .. . ... 6 ..... 7 - A ., _ . , ,. .4.__ , r •rCV 1 `,a 00006-t�ew I� I i• 001110 0110! IMMO wwaMw�no in t wi. (11.111.1 FOP 001,00100 • 1 1 Client MAT Concessionaire,LLC BNP Paribas Arup is lenders'technical advisor to the concessionaire Project owner through the bid stage and now through construction of the Florida Department of first availability payment P3 transport project in the US. Transportation Key facts First fee-based P3 in the US The new twin tunnels between Watson Island and Dodge Island 1.5 miles of new tunnels as twin run beneath the Main Cruise Ship Channel,Government Cut,in tunnels,each 41ft in diameter Biscayne Bay to provide direct access to the Port of Miami, Key services provided recently renamed as PortMiami.The project's objectives include Transaction advice improving access to the port and ensuring its ability to handle projected growth from the opening of the Panama Canal in 2014; increasing traffic safety in Miami by removing port vehicles from the congested downtown street network. Tunnels are being driven using a tunnel boring machine(TBM) utilizing two methods of operation,earth pressure balance mode and water control mode,through karstic limestone,with pre- conditioning grouting along the tunnel alignment to stabilize the soil and ground freezing used for excavation of some of the cross-passages. www.arup.com ARUP TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND ARUP RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Norris Cut Tunnel Project, Miami, FL . r `' r r 1 I.-\))) .„ 't, ... ,t . %; „ i a 1 ,„ 1. 1 .e` ' Off` `� A. ' , Y,d " v , 4 „.„---- 4. .d g r g ra Client ' Nicholson Construction Company Project owner Amp's technical skills have delivered a complex,cost- Miami-Dade Water and Sewer effective,and constructable design to this complicated Department design build project. Key facts Replacement of existing 54in force main from the Virginia Key Central Arup is providing excavation and tunnel design services for the District Wastewater Treatment Plant under Norris Cut to Fisher Island replacement of an existing force main with approximately $70m design build contract 4,500ft of tunnel between Fisher Island and Virginia Key.The Completed 2016 new 60in diameter sanitary force main replaces the previous 54in Key services provided diameter,structurally deficient pipe and transmits all sewage Structural engineering collected from Miami Beach to the wastewater treatment plant on Virginia Key.The design build project includes design of TBM Civil engineering launch and retrieval shafts and segmental tunnel lining.Design Code consulting involved modeling the effects of ground freezing used to seal the Geotechnical engineering TBM break-through and designing water-tight launch and Tunnel design retrieval shafts in highly permeable soils and rock. Awards NCE International Tunnelling Awards,Design Innovation of the Year,2016 ,NN,V,,.arup.com ARU P S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 dIc1r11StLJc1ic i, Landscape Architecture and Water dlandstudio is an interdisciplinary design firm founded dlandstudio's current international work includes the in 2005 by Susannah C. Drake. Prior to starting an site master planning, storm water management, and independent practice, Susannah worked for architects landscape design for the Raising Malawi Academy for and landscape architects in New York, Cape Cod, New Girls outside of Lilongwe, Malawi, and the master plan Hampshire,Wyoming, and San Francisco. Exposure to of a new 1200 acre resort complex and public park in diverse ecosystems, population densities, and scales Abuja, Nigeria.The firm's Brooklyn Queens Expressway of operation enriched her vision of what makes places trench study and Gowanus Canal Sponge ParkTM project truly special. are the recipients of numerous awards including recent recognition by the American Institute of Architecture and The firm provides an integrated approach to planning, American Society of Landscape Architects. dlandstudio programming, and design. As leader and collaborator is a State and City certified WBE. on large consultant teams that include architects, artists, landscape architects, planners, and engineers, dlandstudio helps enrich team consideration of expressions of landscape meaning while maintaining focus on project goals throughout the development process. The firm is committed to creating projects with a strong conceptual basis drawn from an understanding of the place, the client, the program, and appropriate construction techniques.Our goal is to create beautifully designed, ecologically intelligent,and well-executed projects that work well at the large scale and are executed in rigorous detail. Since its establishment in 2005, dlandstudio has grown both nationally and internationally, and currently has 6 employees. The firm's recent public projects include "A New Urban Ground" designed in collaboration with Architectural Research Office for the Museum of Modern Art's Rising Currents Exhibit, the Gowanus Canal Sponge ParkTM, a public open space system designed to absorb and remediate urban storm water, the Scupper Sponge project a bioremediation cell to collect and direct stormwater from a highway scuppers, BQGREEN: Reviving South Williamsburg a project developing strategies to add more open space and mitigate the noise and air pollution of the Brooklyn Queens Expressway, the Brooklyn Bridge Pop-up Park, a temporary waterfront open space that attracted almost two hundred thousand visitors over six weeks of operation in 2008,and the security for the New York City Police Department headquarters in lower Manhattan. TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I OLAND DLANDSTUDIO RESUMES LEADERSHIP Landscape Architecture Foundation, ,. Executive Committee,Vice President of Development,2015-2016 F U.S.Department of State,Bureau of Overseas Building Operations, Jt Peer Reviewer,2013-2016 Cooper Union Institute for Sustainable Design,2010-2012 " Van Alen Institute,Trustee,2009-2014 ,„,... New York City Department of Environmental Protection Green Infrastructure Steering Committee,2011 -present General Services Administration,Peer Reviewer,2011 -2013 likial Am Mayor's Office of City Planning,New York City Department of Economic Development a jC. Waterfront Vision and Enhancement Strategy Task Force,2010-2011 American Society of Landscape Architects,NY Chapter T;e ,a, Past-President,2007-2009,Former-Trustee,2009-2010 Dartmouth College,Design&Planning Advisory Board,2007-2009 SUSANNAH C. DRAKE,FASLA, New York City Department of Planning,Peer Reviewer,Waterfront Zoning Revisions,2009-2011 RA RLA New York City Department of Parks and Recreation/Design Trust for Public Space,Peer Reviewer Principal Design for the 21st Century:High Performance Guidelines,2008 sdrake@dlandstudio.com SELECTED AWARDS+RECOGNITION Susannah C.Drake is the principal of The American Institute of Architects,New Practices New York,2014 DLANDstudio Architecture+Landscape American Society of Landscape Architects,Election to Council of Fellows,2013 Architecture pllc,an award-winning multi- The Architectural League,Emerging Voices,2013 disciplinary design firm.DLANDstudio is The American Institute of Architects,Young Architects Award,2013 the recipient of National and International Design Trust for Public Space,Urban Design Fellow,2013-2015 urban design awards from the AIA,ASLA, and Chicago Athenaeum,among others.As EXPERIENCE one of very few designers of her generation DLANDstudio Architecture+Landscape Architecture pllc,Brooklyn,NY,Principal,2005-present with professional design qualifications in allied works architecture,New York,NY,Associate,2005 Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Rogers Marvel Architects,New York,NY,Associate, 1999-2005 Susannah paved the way for more Dennis Wedlick Architect,New York,NY,Designer, 1998-1999 synthetic thinking about urban ecological Beyer Blinder Belle,Architects&Planners,New York,NY,Designer, 1995-1998 infrastructure. Susannah is the recipient of grants PROFESSIONAL QUAIJFICATIONS from the Graham Foundation,the New Registered Landscape Architect,CLARB,New York,New Jersey,Missouri England Interstate Water Pollution Control Registered Architect,NCARB,New York,Louisiana Commission,the James Marston Fitch Registered Women's Business Enterprise and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise,New York Foundation,the New York State Council TEACHING on the Arts,and the Center for Architecture for research on campus landscapes and Harvard University,Graduate School of Design,Cambridge,MA large scale urban infrastructure projects. Adjunct Professor in Landscape Architecture Seminar Models,Prototypes,and Projections,2016 Susannah is the former President and Trustee Option Studio Professor,The Adaptive City,Core Studio III,2016 of the New York ASLA and former Trustee Adjunct Professor in Landscape Architecture of the Van Alen Institute' She is the author of Option Studio Professor,Planning and Design of Landscapes,2010;Core Studio,2009 WPA 2.0:Beauty,Economics,and Politics Illinois Institute of Technology,College of Architecture,Chicago,IL in the Creation of Public Infrastructure Morgenstern Visiting Chair,2016 which is included as a chapter in Nature Washington University,St.Louis,MO and Cities(2016)and published by the Adjunct Faculty,Graduate Urban Design Studio,2015 Lincoln Land Institute.Her work is featured Florida International University,Miami,FL in the permanent collection of the Museum Visiting Professor,5th Year Landscape Architecture Studio,2014 of Modern Art and the Cooper Hewitt Syracuse University,School of Architecture,Syracuse,NY National Design Museum.She delivered the Visiting Professor,4th Year Architecture New York City Studio,2012 keynote addresses at the 16th Congress of Cooper Union,Irwin S.Chanin School of Architecture,New York,NY the International Union of Women Architects Adjunct Faculty,4th Year Design Studio,2011,2012 n Blacksburg,VA in 2015,and at the XXV The City College of New York,Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of Architecture,New York,NY International Union of Architects World Adjunct Professor,Introduction to Design&Large Scale Planning,2008,2009 Congress in Durban,South Africa in 2014. Professor,History and Theory of Landscape Architecture,2007 Susannah received a Bachelor of Arts Visiting Critic+Lecturer: Degree from Dartmouth College in 1987 Columbia University,Dartmouth College,Harvard University,Kent State University,University of North and Master in Architecture and Master in Carolina,Georgia Tech,Iowa State University,Florida International University,New York Institute of Landscape Architecture degrees from the Technology,University of Arkansas,University of Trondheim,Middlebury College,Parsons The New Harvard University Graduate School of School for Design,Syracuse University,UT Austin,Virginia Tech(Blacksburg,Arlington),IIT Design in 1995 DLANDstudio/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PLLC S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 PROJECTS Project Manager Stapleton Playground,Staten Island,NY One Clinton Street Residential Tower,Brooklyn,NY Artochar Playground,Staten Island,NY McDonald Playground,Staten Island,NY NY Presbyterian Hospital Lower Manhattan Hospital,Manhattan,NY NY Presbyterian Hospital Starr Entrance,Manhattan,NY . Gowanus Canal Pilot Street-End Sponge ParkTM,Brooklyn,NY Prospect Cemetery Revitalization Project,Queens,NY NY Rising Community Reconstruction Program,Nassau County and Staten Island,NY Two Bridges Tower Green Infrastructure Improvements,Manhattan,NY The Sutton Residential Tower,Manhattan,NY BRT Powerhouse,Brooklyn,NY SANDRA CHUCK, RLA,LEED AP New York Stock Exchange Streetscape and Security,Manhattan,NY' Principal Princeton University Lewis Science Library;Scudder Plaza;Marquand Library of Art and schuck@dlandstudio.com Archaeology Plaza and Greenroof;McCarter Theatre/University Place Improvements,Princeton,NJ" Fort Tryon Park Grotto and Alpine Garden,Manhattan,NY" Sandra Chuck is a principal at General Theological Seminary 10th Avenue Entrance and Garden,Manhattan,NY' DLANDstudio where she contributes IAC/InterActiveCorp Headquarters Courtyard and Terrace,Manhattan,NY' her extensive experience in designing Syracuse University:SI Newhouse School Addition,Syracuse,NY' and building many types of projects. Central Park Zoo Snow Leopard and Queens Zoo Jaguar Exhibits,NY' These include parks,campuses,urban Bartow-Pell Mansion Museum&Gardens,Bronx,NY' streetscapes and plazas,cultural Mill Pond Park Master Plan,Bronx,NY' institutions,zoos,residences,and Chappaqua Residence,Chappaqua,NY' playgrounds.She is the project manager New Canaan Residence,New Canaan,Cl" for the Gowanus Canal Pilot Sponge Governors Island Competition,Manhattan,NY' Park in Brooklyn and several playground projects in Staten Island.Prior to joining The Reservoir Landscape and Running Track,Manhattan,NY** DtANDstudio she was an associate at East 72nd Street Playground,Manhattan,NY** Quennell Rothschild&Partners, Merchants'Gate Plaza,Manhattan,NY** West 67th Street(Adventure)Playground,Manhattan,NY** Sandra holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Ladies'Pavilion Landscape,Manhattan,NY** Landscape Architecture from the University West 84th Street(Mariners')Playground,Manhattan,NY** of California,Berkeley. She received Naturalists'Walk,Manhattan,NY** the Geraldine Knight Scott Traveling West 91st Street(Safari)Playground,Manhattan,NY** Scholarship to conduct research on the East 67th Street Playground,Manhattan,NY** cultural aspects of water in design in Italy. Sixth Avenue Entrance(Artists'Gate)Plaza,Manhattan,NY** She is a registered landscape architect and LEED accredited professional. 'Quennell Rothschild&Partners **Central Park Conservancy EXPERIENCE DLANDstudio Architecture+Landscape Architecture pllc,Brooklyn,NY,2013-present Quennell Rothschild&Partners,New York,NY,Associate,2001 -2012 Central Park Conservancy,New York,NY,Construction Manager/Landscape Architect, 1994-2001 Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University,Boston,MA,Horticultural Internship Certificate Program, 1993 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Registered Landscape Architect,New York LEED Accredited Professional EDUCATION University of California,Berkeley College of Environmental Design Bachelor of Arts,Landscape Architecture, 1992 TEACHING Guest Critic: Pratt Institute,Columbia University FELLOWSHIPS Geraldine Knight Scott Traveling Scholarship,Italy, 1994 DLANDstudio/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PLLC TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM 5+4 I ARUP I OLAND DLANDSTUDIO RESUMES PROJECTS Project Manager NOLA St.Roch Green Infrastructure Master Plan,New Orleans,LA Designer Stapleton Playground,Staten Island,NY J.Petrosino Playground,Brooklyn,NY t NYU President's Residence Roof Terrace,Manhattan,NY Gowanus Canal Pilot Street-End Sponge Porter*,Brooklyn,NY Arrochar Playground,Staten Island,NY McDonald Playground,Staten Island,NY Stuyvesant Park Fence Restoration,Manhattan,NY Two Bridges Tower Green Infrastructure Improvements,Manhattan,NY New Rochelle Waterfront Gateway,New Rochelle,NY Paths to Pier 42,Manhattan,NY ERIN WYTHOFF Designer Intern ewythoff@dlandstudio.com Mississippi Delta Changing Course Competition,LA* Brooklyn Bridge Park,Brooklyn,NY** Erin is a designer at DLANDstudio. She North Grant Park,Chicago,IL** received a Bachelor of Science in Civil and Wolter Creek,Austin,TX** Environmental Engineering from Villanova University and a Master in Landscape *West 8 **Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates Architecture from Harvard University.Prior to her work in landscape architecture,Erin EXPERIENCE developed a comprehensive stormwater Design Experience management plan for the historic Bala DLANDstudio Architecture+Landscape Architecture pllc,Brooklyn,NY, Cynwyd,PA railroad station.Most recently Intern,2013,Designer,2015-present she worked on the Changing Course West 8,New York,NY,Landscape Designer,20142015 Competition which focused on the rapid Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates,Brooklyn,NY,Intern,2012 landloss and future of Lower Mississippi Olin Studio,Philadelphia,PA,Extern,2010 River Delta. Additional Experience OPSYS,Cambridge,MA,Designer+Researcher,2014 Harvard University Maps Collection,Cambridge,MA,Geospatial Cataloger,2012-2013 !DOT,Trenton Headquarters,NJ,Intern,2010 EDUCATION Harvard University,Graduate School of Design Master in Landscape Architecture,2014 Villanova University Bachelor of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering,2011 Study Abroad:University of Melbourne TEACHING Harvard University,Graduate School of Design Teaching Assistant,2013-2014 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Associate Member,American Society of Civil Engineers(A.M.ASCE) Associate,American Society of Landscape Architects(ASLA) PUBLICATIONS Platform 7,Harvard University Publication,2014 DLANDstudio/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PITC S+A I ARUP I OLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 `liy "��. , • GOWANUS CANAL SPONGE PARKTM MASTERPLAN , .,, , ' Brooklyn, NY r '. i , , .... Gowanus has a rich history.Originally a large,marshy wetland,the area is y the site of early Dutch settlement, important Revolutionary War battles,and = ,. ,gr 4^^� ee '; �M`: commercial industrial activity stretching back over 100 years. Now an EPA { "` it Superfund site,planners and real estate developers envision the area ro be a " ,a,,:—.;''' + � � locus of large residential development—a controversial proposal in light of the cs t area's overburdened infrastructure and highlycontamined environment. In this "1 context,and working closely with local community organizations,government agencies,and elected officials,DLANDstudio initiated and designed a new kind fix" of public open space called Sponge Park". sx The Sponge Park'.design grants equal value to the aesthetic,programmatic, t and productive importance of treating contaminated water entering the Gowanus � '4 Canal. The Gowanus receives many millions of gallons of combined sewage effluent every year.The park is designed as a working landscape that improves the health of the canal over time.This innovative plan proposes strategies to divert stormwater run-off for use in the public park along the canal,reducing the ,.. input of stormwater into the sewer system.The Sponge Park"Pilot,completed in ' ,. <. "if2016,manages nearly 2,000,000 gallons of stormwater per annum. •,�, PROJECT ARIA 11.4 acres ��r PE Master Plan ` PRONCT SCOft - 11, PROICTT SUNS Ongoing KV itt.1 44 iiKillp4I.L 0-44 4,I., ii.s.litMOOR Ruootrr $46,000,000 ! cum Gowanus Canal Conservancy AWARDS National AIA,Honor Award,Regional and Urban Design, .,' ,S`„ 2011;National ASIA,Honor Award,Analysis and Planning,2010;AIANYS,Award of Merit,Unbuilt,2009; Green Dot Awards:Service Category,Honorable Mention, V * 2009;BSA Award for Urban Regeneration,2009;Chicago ►rrgt } q t x A ' Athenaeum&European Centre for Architecture Art Design l ,. qS' S. ,$ &Urban Studies,Good Design Awards,"2009 GOWANUS CANAL SPONGE PARK'.MASIFRPUW ,s G1, � `dm °py Y + DLANDstudio/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PLLC TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I OLAND DLANDSTUDIO RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Gowanus Canal Sponge Park Pilot"" Manhattan,NY �., �,k,t ,. N ' =moi.i, •"f-.`;s.1. r, +t. ,F.. 1 r-. ;- ; ., "tr. f : 4= w1 _ :-. .,jj•, �'":', i s t. -, war - .7 ' i„;)•„:'''tti 1 :,...4,.,%: N 7,1...-,:,-,:x.,,,,..... �" ,: i ,. - •+r- ' • ;moi% t. 5 *". 4. Y" ,�.�.. t > ti:. • . ... . ....., ,... .., , , ., . . . .. ,,,..•.... _ __ . 1. , , ......, ..,. ...•... • .:.,.. .• ..,. 4,, _ it— . • `• I r ''.;.-:",1.: ....a' • '"` .'�r, . ' - y r r } ry „I . .- ry q"r x i.a ^.-:.''.. pA ^ a ,.. fe .,. I ... t sr. . ___ „..... - ...: ,.., ,..,...., ..:. , ...,. ••......:• x ' » m .. —"""7.#,...4',,,••--."0, r - ,i ' a ''''1",;T:'-,'t , .'inn + iy-s '" " [- DLANDettrda/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PLLC S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM TAB 2 MOMA RISING CURRENTS: II « A NEW URBAN GROUND 1~� Manhattan, NY fir-~ . ifilyi "'° P 't DLANDstudio partnered with ARO to create"A New Urban Ground"for the �' }�;' Museum of Modern Art's 2010 Rising Currents exhibition,calling attention to ..Mxa,"R Manhattan's vulnerability to climate change impacts.Currently,an oppositional ..;;;;ET.t,P1.14, r, relationship exists between the built city and water."A New Urban Ground" Q proposes an integrated and reciprocal organization of natural and hard Iliad sinfrastructure systems.Acombination of strategies,including perimeter wetlands, , ' + ;y; a raised edge,and sponge slips(water management landscapes in the old boat slips),paired with new upland street-infrastructure systems,protect the island from flooding in the event of a large storm. Our proposal consists of two components that form an interconnected system: porous green streets and a graduated edge.Porous streets will absorb typical rain events and help keep surface water out of the city's combined sewer system. In larger storms,the streets filter and carry water to new perimeter wetlands to 1 1i i enrich coastal ecologies. t�� A New Urban Ground is part of the permanent collection at the Cooper-Hewitt 1National Design Museum and MoMA. )1 PROJECT A*IA 679 acres ' + P*GMCT ICOM Master Plan 6,4 P*OJICT sums Completed May 2010 - ~ P COACT SUDOR $400,000 OMIT Museum of Modern Art — — tM, WARDS AIA NY Chapter,2011 Urban Design Award A l ti. 111 A .�. .M. pf 1. "f � r �..d kit-t. I lf` nun µ m `` DLANDstvdio/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PLLC TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND o go t 1- \NN' ..\\. :-N\\\ -\\\ \,,\,\\\\,\\\\\\ \ \ \ , m w 0 ti1111111111 .....,,, t 1 a o cn "Sii2'.,..... ,,,,,N,:,,,,,_,..r. , \ \ \\\\ \ , \ \ , \ \ o Lj o P 1'1/4 \ \ \ \ IS\ —, ii'l Al ,.. ...,, , .:v191111.... ..s..„7_,.., 'NC*.- 'tL7s,k..4‘r. \ , 't oy,1 \\' a N,,NN iiie. ,.\ * , L-- . 1 r, ��_ �.,r 4 4. �, '''Z',)":-- > L -.+�t'i.° r� ' 1 -" k-:. . f . •...-. ..-.. �- — f u, „.� t ti� - .� A }► f , - � _, • �'�' Y N��t �� F 4 4 liki, ,,,,,,, Nit In, .11:14110,0, _ , li It. * - _.. ' t .4.,t,u.�a ,wf irY r POjiti • L h r I�1i r 7'a r w ,ra is M+ �r INJ V 1, :goo:40 (�,v-V L4 17 s w is a • i , :,,,,�'' --1, IW- - + 1 ,-.•- + cr ��'► ' ,!"`"` IT— _p � �1'Ailhiliii,11i, . 6, t. ,sem ii r �ds.� j ,10,-.' t I . o Q Z iP� } _ t u,per *"-- t \'. O Z 5 0 a D CY a a COME HIGH WATER '_� ,.*+ • o,,, „ P Miami, Florida; Karachi, Pakistan;Shanghai,China; • : ' _ t. Nile River Delta, Egypt New York New York .<t 7 . r *: $ p Climate change is causing an incremental rise in the world's ocean level and stronger tropical storms.These changes threaten coastal cities that are important both regionally and globally,spurring population displacement and '''''.*/t.' - i' upsetting economic,ecological,and agricultural systems.Traditional hard- Iredged engineered solutions have depreciating value over time due to their 1 -' inability to adapt.A holistic approach of uniting coastal ecologies,new hybrid _- grey/green environmental management strategies and urban infrastructure [C[ provides a more resilient path forward.Connecting upland strategies to ftp t . absorb,direct,and capture storm-water is necessary to form an interconnected t�.° - system and develop a complete solution. i i"ett.", 'to� In this ongoing research project,DIANDstudio examines Miami,Karachi, ', Shanghai,the Nile River Delta,and New York City to see how these strategies can be adapted to mitigate the effects of sea level rise in these areas. Economies of tourism,fishing,finance,agriculture,and maritime industrial development relate to the strategies examined in each case study. i z" ,. a Vi. 1 MIAMI,FLORIDA,USA SOUTH BEACH:TOURIST COMMUNITIES BIOSWALES FLOOD GATE STILTED BUILDINGS cs r CONSTRUCTED DUNES `tee , ... 1 "- t %.,t-,,,,,;,.N. s • .. P'r a . TIDAL INLET N i" ' r�'° °' _ /I►' • _ CONSTRUCTED REEF BUILDING BERM , MANGROVE r AQUIFER a. �4 . ♦+,%.,%%'''.' t.7 ,. ..d... BEACH SWELL CONSTRUCTED BREAKWATER DLANDehsdio/Architecture+Landscape Architecture PLLC TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND DLANDSTUDIO RELEVANT EXPERIENCE \ ST. ROCH New Orleans, LA • In 2015,DLANDstudio was selected to develop a green infrastructure master •y t „";,, '� I •' plan for the St.Rock neighborhood of New Orleans,LA. DIANDstudio r ., is performing this work as one of the on call contractors for the City under ' :• •.e the Design,Engineering,and Construction Management Services Pool for Resilience,Stormwater Management,and/or Green InfrastrucNro.The - neighborhood is primarily residential with some commercial uses along the r+ bounding streets and interspersed within the 26 block area.The intent of the design effort is to reduce flood risk and manage stormwater �noff through a combination of structural drainage upgrades and green00 infrastructure . �.;r. - -__.. interventions. The team will be involved throughout all design phases from conceptual design through construction administration.DLANDstudio's work will "' emphasize environmental concerns,green infrastructure,and communityeducation and outreach about the value of stormwater BMPs. t. Project funding is provided through the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program(HMGP). Additional funding may be acquired from different funding - _- r :- sources during the project. keY PROJECT Sin 26 square blocks :'4';:7-'1, ` 5' -z.t PROJECT STATUS Ongoing T pSoJIcr RUDOR $7.5 Million ,,., .,,,, 7i: .sem ,.^-,,,o; CLIENT The City of New Orleans a-s ry. f {. x suer-« o f„. _ � � _•r aA : x • if 4 a ,- ,°.x$ y i. ! C gyp fJ+ �" ce't 'm'f+"P• ill-4.-r.- `S. r ' 4' `l,:� � •+ _ ,- , Vv!. °�� r rt FwF-7.,":„, n , �. A',..qis R J "AI ;y .. s� -, iw z '"". 4, :., ....;.%, ,457�" , 'nmoi• it.A .-7;7k iW-7 c_ r ,d te : --'V''' � 1 ; ;04f• ".. 1 i)) �° ....s.� - 1i ' = 'u[, N . . S .r rte ,7. k 1r t1;'r M • • '^�w�v� 4: �� '.°7e E-y+."7 +..i't-'1':.q,•' #4 "'M .,:,-,-4,--,—;•._ ' t v+• A a 4tv EM. ....: ,s�/y Ar + • "'.�'; r;ar ,,--*iv-' �.y-_ rt,.1t"+- --1,-+ r 11,4 it* --- -.4.4,-4-4.; . Viµ � _. w f''f11, ! 4y !A! rI''. 0. a µ' 11.1-;-,,. +�,..y--•^' �. "w 41 a. 'w�„"(e •.��♦ flf > J tl f .." tp ,'} ! y,7 L ,i..47-, y P III; y• ,y, 1.5„„,,,r ! At, "!7s...,- •!t+1 ..ti- „2.-7-:...;:-:,-, .Y 4! t�I r ✓ ti ' ' ; f,,,,9Enrt r,r?Er 'tr .r+ c , - . ,,..1, ,-,4 :, * t _8E►' , a }, illi , s. w.. - �`,er•t_,.�w :"77.7„(i... � w t� �".` fYy� J i y a°,'C 1- �s” t `j 0 .. fix „ 1'' t t r„i.*" ..'r '..a. ^.d;' »t/. -. r f '.. torr ,ri7• ° .� .. .. ' l . k- "7,41 7 7 r„-. i. p.' leer F)�l1E • "�`'' . !• ;•l.}I�R►'"T •S * IJ ANDstudio/Architecture+landscape Architecture PLLC $+A I ARUP OLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 HPC E Structural Engineering Youssef Hachem Consulting Engineering, Inc. is a Corporation established in 2004, by its President Youssef Hachem Ph.D., P.E.,S.I.We are a medium size Consulting Engineering Firm located in Miami, Florida. Throughout the years we have developed relationships with different municipalities throughout Florida as well as several different departments within Miami-Dade County. We have worked in different variations of jobs for Miami Dade County, including work done for the Water and Sewer Department. Our experience consists but it not limited to rehabilitation of historic structures in the Art Deco District in Miami Beach, new construction encompasses Mid-rise Residential Multifamily Buildings, Retail Buildings and Warehouses. Our structural experience is focused but not limited to Steel Buildings, Concrete Buildings, Masonry Construction and Timber Construction. We have a vast knowledge in Computer Modeling of Structures, Feasibility Studies, 40 Year Condition Assessment, Constructability Studies, State of Florida `Threshold Inspections", Construction Inspections and Construction Administration. Our firm has a select staff of professionals with a wide and diverse experience in the practice of structural and civil engineering analysis and design and construction services. We are committed to engineering excellence and offer our clients a high level of quality, efficiency and service in a timely and cost effective manner.YHCE is a talented, experienced and innovative engineering firm, taking advantage of the latest design and computer technology available.YHCE has extensive experience in historical building renovations. Services provided: •Commercial •Structural Designs •Modifications and renovations • Historical Buildings/Hotels • Municipal/Heavy Civil •Marina Design •Seawalls Design •Cofferdams Design •GPR Lighting Services • Pole & Foundation Design •Wind load Calculations • Inspection •Street, commercial Lighting • Inspection Services •Budgeting •Construction Monitoring/scheduling •Condition Assessments •40 Year Certification TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND YHCE RESUMES YOUSSEF H. HACHEM, Ph.D., P.E., S.I. President EDUCATION: University of Miami, Miami, Florida; 1984 Degree:B.S.C.E. Cum Laude B.S.A.E. Cum Laude University of Miami, Miami, Florida; 1987 Degree:M.S.C.E. University of Miami, Miami, Florida; 1990 Degree:Ph.D., Major Civil Engineering LICENSES: Licensed Professional Engineer: Florida Connecticut Georgia Texas EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS: Youssef Hachem Consulting Engineering, Inc. President Jan. 2004- Present G. M. Selby and Associates, Inc., Miami, Florida Vice President&CTO Oct. 1997-Dec. 2003 PAWA Complex Int'l, Inc., Miami, Florida Chief Operating Officer June 1992-Oct. 1997 Hazen and Sawyer, Miami, Florida Principal Engineer Feb, 1987-June 1992 S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ Senior Structural Engineer EDUCATION: 1987-1992 Higher Polytechnic Institute "Jose A. Echeverria" Havana, Cuba Graduated Equivalent of U.S. Bachelor Degree of Science in Civil Engineering. EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS: Youssef Hachem Consulting Engineering, Inc. Senior Structural Engineer 06/2016—Present: Project manager, including full design and construction administration for various projects. De Los Reyes Engineering, Inc. Structural Engineer: 09/2013—06/2016 Project manager, including full design and construction's administration process. Design of structural elements including slabs, beams, columns, shear walls and foundations. Posttensioned slab design. Youssef Hachem Consulting Engineering, Inc. Senior Structural Engineer 10/2008-09/2013: Project manager, including full design and construction administration for various projects. De Los Reyes Engineering, Inc. Structural Engineer: 04/2001 —0/2008 Project manager, including full design and construction's administration process. Relevant Project Experience Condominium and Hospitality Experience: • 1212 Lincoln Road multiuse project including an open market, hotel&parking. • Collins Park project at 2000 Park Ave, Miami Beach, Fl • 321 Ocean Dr.Miami Beach, Fl-7& 11 stories combined residential complex. Commercial: • Regatta Bay, Miami Beach -7 stories boutique building Single Family Residential: • High luxury custom homes at South Shore Dr& Rivo Alto, Miami Beach. • 234 Washington Ave 3 stories townhomes building • Normandy Venture building complex at 25-135 North Shore Dr, MB, Florida TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Si-A I ARUP I DLAND Y]LCE RESUMES EDUARDO HERNANDEZ Senior Project Manager EDUCATION: 1980-1995— Universidad de Camaguey, Cuba. Graduated. Bachelor Degree of Science in Structural Engineering. EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS: Youssef Hachem Consulting Engineering, Inc. Structural Engineer 2010— Present: Project manager, including full design and construction administration for various projects. De Los Reyes Engineering, Inc. Structural Engineer: 10/2002—01/2009 Project manager, including full design and construction's administration process. Design of structural elements including slabs, beams, columns, shear walls and foundations. Posttensioned slab design. Relevant Project Experience Condominium and Hospitality Experience: • Gale Hotel- 12 Story Condo/Hotel Fort Lauderdale, FL • 600 Alton- Residential Complex of Three 5 story Buildings and underground garage, Miami Beach, FL • Betsy Hotel, Miami Beach, FL • Raleigh Hotel, Miami Beach, FL • Vintro Hotel Miami Beach • Tatum Pointe Condominium, Miami Beach, FL-5 stories condominium Commercial: Nike Lincoln Road- Retail Miami Beach, FL 701 Lincoln Rd- Forever 21 Miami Beach, FL Single Family Residential: • Belle Meade Residence • Fairman Residence, Miami Beach, FL S+A ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 COLLINS PARK n teItiliti1111br .1111: H J. 1.... . Vit. ari S - (•••••-'" c . "."r i lik - , r A w - s w 41 L ' 4 l'-' 1 ,. '...! t4.14:4"1:"*. _ t, ,„, I ", Ili: r ►♦ c L 1.07:t4.4.__ 716' am„ • �. -- - .",.-^ : �,-• .- e 4 , ., , � , ti n a . -- -11 yr � • p,w.,,„., - _ "S,-=-,'10.•40m"1r '-‘1,',4,41 ,. 'INT Y " a. . fin ,A► 4. ;w.#. + } i '"ii '- .^e='taR�4 a.�.,,":' .n..*- U ,,.a '� ,aur - ' 44 j a oil t s. s „it •,. if Project Description: Located at 2000 Park Avenue Miami Beach. Collins Park is made up of six buildings which will become a complex that will be restored to have a hotel, bars and a restaurant. Complete restoration and rebuild of the floors in concrete. Agency Name: CG Sunny Isles, LLC Agency Contact: Jeanine Rodriguez Telephone: 786-379-3789 Email: jeanrod26260gmail.com Years: 2011- Present TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND YHCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ANSONIA HOTEL , mg 111111 V 1(4. *Lir; ' ,,,,,....—... ....; , li. 1 ".. .t PPF . a .� 1 r r: w. it *. f; R It Illifi9r minis , .._..._.. ..____NM r 7.•t . 11 ° k t- ifflkiii Jai olisti& 44' , \ 1 G/>l ► I `, �. .+ UV ell A 4... �r W I1 t U!u1 i a # 'i Wiwi*Mk i111�r1'Ifll* lit • 1 4 Project Description: Complete historical restoration of hotel. Elevated first floor. Rebuild of the floors with concrete Agency Name: Think Properties Agency Contact: Shawn Vardi Telephone: 516-606-0900 Email: svardi@thinkhotelgrp.com Years: 3 Years S+A I ARUP I OLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 PLYMOUTH HOTEL Ill x,1 "cam- _ , 1 )041 '` welie .. .' . 110% Ili . f I Vii fiOSk: ii . e 1►+t %Itli , , ' '1-,, ° ilSifd t B i t , _ Y MIIIIIIbhir 4rsi 3 rIS' Project Description: Complete historical restoration of hotel. Preserved facades to keep the historical aspect of the building. Rebuild of the floors with concrete. Agency Name: Think Properties Agency Contact: Shawn Vardi Telephone: 516-606-0900 Email: svardi@thinkhotelgrp.com Years: 3 Years TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND YHCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE KASKADES , Niiarak- - nisi 71 fame/WI ti f7t , ri w ,w1..µ,,.,. �.r .; 1 illigii r is • , -41. �A , ! ± 1.1A (y� lit 1 * ii 1 �' 8 - 't v , .tt:::* . ,.a�l�+. i ,fi t. 1Y . ,ma I Ili, 111Nritiiiiii. ,,,: . w: psi. +�. -i` « — _ A .- ,. ., "" ! .. , "fir , <... . Project Description: Complete historical restoration of hotel. Added a new floor to the structure. Preserved historical façades and rebuild of floors with concrete. Agency Name: Crescent Heights Agency Contact: Victor Nieves Telephone: 305-487-0269 Email: vnievesOcrescentheights.com Years: 2 Years S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 GOLDEN SANDS ' I 1 . : ., f 0 _,:'''. 11-1: l', ilii167:14,,.. : .01 .. ro ,'.:: , . fir "Alt :1 III I lit II It . a'—, : --r. I ..,...es _ Pal*Ittzt,11-11 t , 1.14*.17Att; '-'I ' ll „st # 0 • .7., 44 *,f4, ..... ' - ..i 1 ilk ih ilir k -IMO ''''• ‘ ....,#### - # i • 1.11111 ' " illi ' t...L __ • \ \,• '' •- . . te a _ . :, 4111 k • , \ .,„,•• 1 1 - 11111 - , *I/iit'i, k I ' I - k, .111I'llk‘4. 11'" ' «, • s _— ,kk i -• ,....., fee......,... r Ns . ‘\.1' f A: • i — ........01 7 w r ,.. ' ' 1*". 4 Project Description: Bracing of historical hotel which will be completely renovated. Agency Name: South Florida Condominium Management Agency Contact: Yair Wolff Telephone: 305-637-3699 Email: yawolffagmail•com Years: Under Construction S+A I ARUP I DLAND TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM YHCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CARLTON HOTEL —�: ,,,,,40— ' Na '4"-- 1 iv r 7 1 —7, 1 lir -01.31 . ...straim------.1, .,„ poil 1' ! 1 ■ 11 1 . ..' a 4 i is i9111 i it ii Ili 1 ,•;' ' !! 1 ■ 1r1111 1 it , r iii..-- .... D _ ' , 1 s #lit i iiiisCroi '7*, i•,,, c4 s al .1._ .. si 1 4116 a R Project Description: Total restoration of historical hotel and rebuild of the floors with concrete. Added two floors and a bridge that connects 2 historical buildings. Agency Name: The Betsy Hotel Agency Contact: Jeff Lehman Telephone: 305-760-8419 Email: jlehman@thebetsyhotel.com Years: 2 Years S+A I ARUP I OLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 YJLCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE STIRRUP HOUSE 'p,� 1 1--. nx, r t.„......, ' ,Ani-----..)1,,,, . - . �N 1 � • z ,, _.;,-�--erai- - m`1.} _ m_ ' !! lisy `% ` i ' 1 _�, :1 7 lig' po• I 'UI , ,, iiA. -� • (Rij eP "4�� �, .-. ,...� 1 � � •_ FYI, �� w l • a. ti� miff 7 t i : 0.1 11 ' ''''dila, . —40 .'-, —, . ".s' i - c.. liR • 0 0 Project Description: Shoring of two-story frame vernacular house built in 1897 to be restored. Designed new foundations to comply with the current Florida Building Code. Agency Name: The Morex Group Agency Contact: Ricardo Villarroel Telephone: 305-262-5511 Email: rvillarroel@themorexgroup.com Years: 2 Years TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND COASTAL SYS7EoMs Civil, Coastal Engineering, Geotechnical Youssef Hachem Consulting Engineering, Inc. is a Corporation established in 2004, by its President Youssef Hachem Ph.D., P.E.,S.I.We are a medium size Consulting Engineering Firm located in Miami, Florida. Throughout the years we have developed relationships with different municipalities throughout Florida as well as several different departments within Miami-Dade County. We have worked in different variations of jobs for Miami Dade County, including work done for the Water and Sewer Department. Our experience consists but it not limited to rehabilitation of historic structures in the Art Deco District in Miami Beach, new construction encompasses Mid-rise Residential Multifamily Buildings, Retail Buildings and Warehouses. Our structural experience is focused but not limited to Steel Buildings, Concrete Buildings, Masonry Construction and Timber Construction. We have a vast knowledge in Computer Modeling of Structures, Feasibility Studies, 40 Year Condition Assessment, Constructability Studies, State of Florida `Threshold Inspections", Construction Inspections and Construction Administration. Our firm has a select staff of professionals with a wide and diverse experience in the practice of structural and civil engineering analysis and design and construction services. We are committed to engineering excellence and offer our clients a high level of quality, efficiency and service in a timely and cost effective manner.YHCE is a talented, experienced and innovative engineering firm, taking advantage of the latest design and computer technology available. YHCE has extensive experience in historical building renovations. Services provided: •Commercial •Structural Designs •Modifications and renovations • Historical Buildings/Hotels •Municipal/Heavy Civil •Marina Design •Seawalls Design •Cofferdams Design •GPR Lighting Services • Pole& Foundation Design •Wind load Calculations • Inspection •Street, commercial Lighting • Inspection Services •Budgeting •Construction Monitoring/scheduling •Condition Assessments •40 Year Certification S+A I ARUP I DLAND 22 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 R. Harvey Sasso As the Principal-In-Charge, Mr.Sasso is responsible for providing overall Principal-In-Charge management,direction and coordination to the engineering team for professional services related to all projects undertaken by Coastal Systems.In this capacity, he determines time schedules;allocates Education resources;directs joint ventures, sub-consultants and team members in Master of Science, Civil Engineering performing field investigations and technical evaluations;and directs the Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada development and evaluates the feasibility of design alternatives. Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Mr.Sasso has over 30 years experience as a professional coastal engineer, having worked on numerous projects in Florida,the Caribbean, Licensure and Europe.He has been involved in all aspects of coastal/marine Professional Engineer, FL projects, including project design,engineering analysis,environmental permitting,and the legal, political and managerial elements of project Professional Affiliations implementation. American Society of Civil Engineers Florida Engineering Society He has a reputation for providing a business approach to engineering Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association having planned, designed and implemented numerous coastal/waterfront Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers development projects.Mr.Sasso pioneered a regional approach to Publications coastal sediment budget from Hillsboro Inlet in Broward County to "Artificial Reef Construction:An Engineered Government Cut in Dade County. This sediment study encompassed 35 Approach", R.H.Sasso,T.K.Blankenship, miles of shoreline,two counties,four inlets, one taxing district and ten S. Higgins, and K.Banks, Feb.2004 National municipalities. Conference on Beach Preservation Technology Selected Relevant Experience "Mooring Buoys for the Largest Cruise Ship in the World,"J.Juhl,T.K. Blankenship, and R.H.Sasso, Beachwalk,Miami Beach,Florida Proceedings, Ports 2001 Conference CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Civil/coastal engineering design and environmental permitting for the "Village of Key Biscayne Beach Renourishment and 4,000 foot on grade paver walkway that connects Lummus Park to the Management of Offshore Seagrasses,"Cameron north to 21st Street in the South Beach district of Miami Beach. Perry and Harvey Sasso, P.E., Proceedings of the 2001 National Conference on Beach Preservation Bal Harbour Jogging Path,Village of Bal Harbour,Florida Technology CLIENT:Village of Bal Harbour Landscape architecture and environmental permitting for jogging path "Miami Beach 32nd Street Hot Spot: Numerical and dune restoration project. Modeling and Design Optimization,"Adam Shah and Harvey Sasso, P.E., Proceedings of the 2001 National Conference on Beach Preservation Golfito Waterfront Revitalization,Costa Rica Technology CLIENT:Hacienda El Dorado "Regional Beach Restoration Plan for Three Design Development and permitting for waterfront revitalization of Consecutive Barrier Islands in South Florida," Golfito and 68-hectare eco-resort on island across the bay. Assessed Paul C. P.Lin, Ph.D., P.E., R.Harvey Sasso, P.E. existing utility services to meet new demand for waterfront and island and C.Anthony Spell, Proceedings of the 1997 development. Master planning completed and financial development National Conference on Beach Preservation planning completed to incorporate marinas with existing cruise ship Technology pier and other amenities. "Combined Sand Bypassing and Navigation Grove Harbour(Dinner Key Boatyard Marina),Miami,Florida Improvements at Hillsboro Inlet, Broward County, CLIENT:City of Miami Florida: The Importance of a Regional Approach," Design and environmental permitting for 110-slip marina and 600-foot Dr. Paul C.-P.Lin, P.E., Inger Hansen, and R.Harvey bulkhead replacement. Mitigation design provided and maintenance Sasso, P.E., Proceedings of the 1996 National dredging designed. Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, St. Petersburg, Florida, 1996, pp.43-59. TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I OLAND CSI RESIJMES Andres Perez Mr.Perez has over 17 years of civil engineering experience in Florida. He has completed the planning, design and construction administration Engineering Department Head for site/civil projects including parks,streetscape,and Right-of-Way.He has also completed designs for private site developments such as hotels, Education condominiums, parking lots/garages, commercial properties and dry Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, stack marinas.These projects have required the design of stormwater Florida International University, Miami, Florida management systems consisting of retention areas,drainage wells, exfiltration trenches, and outfalls.These projects have also required the Licensure design of water and sanitary sewer services. Professional Engineer, FL His site/civil design experience in Florida includes the permitting of projects through agencies such as the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(DEP), South Florida Water Management District,and Florida Department of Transportation.He has processed stormwater management designs through these agencies to obtain Environmental Resource Permits(ERP), and he has demonstrated experience with projects adjacent to the coast and/or waterfront. These projects have required extensive coordination with diverse project teams to design projects that meet the development programming goals for both public and private sector clients,but that also meet the stringent regulatory permitting criteria to manage surface water runoff. Selected Relevant Experience 17th,18th,and 20th Street Ends Improvements,Miami Beach, Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Design and environmental permitting of multi-purpose public access corridor traversing the western edge of beach dunes between 17th Street and 20th Street. Design encompasses 15 blocks and three city parks. Bayfront Street Ends Improvements,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Bulkhead design and environmental permitting for street ends at South Shore Drive, 10th Street, 14th Street, Lincoln Road as well as Island View Park.Streetscape design for street ends at South Shore Drive, 10th Street and Lincoln Road to improve upland access to the waterfront. Paving, grading,drainage lighting and landscape/ hardscape improvements. Capri South Beach,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT: Maefield Development Paving, grading and drainage design for 3 residential complexes with a total 72 units and an underground parking garage next to Biscayne Bay, covering two city blocks.Design included water main extensions for each street,fire, sanitary services, street ends and storm drainage system improvement for the neighborhood with associated pump stations. S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 LiLiana Smatt Ms.Smatt has over 12 years of project management experience in construction, environmental permitting and design consulting.Areas Senior Project Manager of expertise include coastal and waterfront site development focusing on project feasibility,conceptual design and permitting strategy.Ms. Education Smatt oversees implementation of specialized projects that include coastaVwaterfront resorts, residential,and mixed-use structures,docks Bachelors in Business Administration, and marinas, beach nourishment, inlet stabilization and maintenance, University of Miami, Coral Gables beach and inland coastal waters shoreline stabilization structures, stormwater drainage systems,parks and other recreational facilities,and Project Management Professional Certification environmental enhancement projects She has ample experience working University of Miami, Coral Gables with various environmental agencies such as the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Professional Affiliations Commission(FWC), Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), Project Management Institute US Army Corps of Engineers(USACOE), as well as all local municipalities Florida Floodplain Managers Association in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties. Ms.Smatt coordinates with project teams and regulatory agencies relative to code compliance requirements for securing comprehensive permit approvals at local,county,state, and federal levels.She has an in-depth understanding of the many regulations and procedures governing coastal/ waterfront construction,and has established relationships with key regulatory agency personnel. Selected Relevant Experience Beachwalk,Miami Beach, Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Civil/coastal engineering design and environmental permitting for the on-grade paver walkway that connects 22nd Street and Lummus Park in the South Beach district of Miami Beach. Beachwalk II,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Civil/coastal engineering design and environmental permitting for the 2,300 linear feet on-grade paver walkway that connects South Pointe Park, Marjory Stoneman Douglas Park, and Lummus Park in the South of Fifth district of Miami Beach. Beachwalk North Extension,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Design coordination, environmental permitting, and marine turtle lighting approval for an extension of the City Miami Beach's original Beachwalk path between 21st and 23rd Streets, east of the W Hotel and City Park. The Saxony Hotel and Condominium Development,Miami Beach, Florida CLIENT: Patrinely Group, LLC Florida Department of Environmental Protection coastal permitting of the Saxony Hotel and Condominium site development,within the Middle Beach Neighborhood, adjacent to the City's existing, historic boardwalk.Coastal Systems obtained coastal as well as civil permits for the site. TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Si-A I ARUP I DLAND CSI RESUMES Sibtey Hasan As Sr.Coastal Engineer with Coastal Systems, Mr.Hasan conducts Sr. Coastal Engineer and interprets numerical models,and subsequently applies the results for coastal and waterfront projects.He was involved in several coastal resiliency projects in the New York and New Jersey city area while working Education with Dewberry Engineers.He has over 10 years of worldwide experience Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering in providing engineering solutions related to hydraulic structure design, U.P.Technical University, India waterfront development studies,beach protection, recreational beach management,scour analysis and offshore dredging/reclamation.His Master of Engineering,Water Resources and expertise lies in numerical modeling of coastal-river hydrodynamics, Hydrodynamics sediment transport, near shore spectral wave transformation, oil spill Indian Institute of Science, India tracking,bathymetric evolution, littoral transport and two&three- dimensional hydrodynamic processes.His expertise also includes detailed Publications knowledge of MIKE21, MIKE3 DELFT3D,TELEMAC, MIKE URBAN, Sibtey Hasan., 2016.Changes in Flow LITPACK and MIKE FLOOD modeling tools to analyze and solve complex Hydro-Dynamics during Moderate,Typical and engineering and scientific problems. Extreme Historical Discharge Events at the Gautami Godavari River Entrance, India-A Case Study.Jr of Selected Relevant Experience Water Res and Hyd Eng.5(4), pp. 160-171. Sibtey Hasan1, ChiranjeeviRambabu AZ 2017. Red Hook Integrated Flood Protection Feasibility Study, New York Enhanced Representation of Java Sea Tidal Client:New York City Economic Development Corporation's Propagation through Sensitivity Analysis.Jr of Coastal modeling for Red Hook NY, which had unprecedented flooding Water Res and Hyd Eng.6 (1), pp.9-21. during Hurricane Sandy. Participated in a detailed"Integrated Flood Speaking Engagements Protection Study"(IFPS) in order to ensuring a more resilient Red Lead speaker at Association of State Flood Plain Hook community in the face of future extreme weather and a changing Manager(ASFPM) conference at Michigan United climate. States, 2016. Rebuild by Design Hudson River,New Jersey Transit, Hoboken, Professional affiliations Weehawken and Jersey city,NJ American Society of Civil Engineers—ASCE Client: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, American Shore&Beach Preservation Association Detailed street scale coastal modeling to address the issues related (ASBPA) to inland flooding to build community resilience to prevent from both The International Association for Hydro Environment major storm surges and as well as from heavy rainfall events. Engineering and Research (IAHR) Consulting Engineers Society of India—CES Hydrological Study for Deen Dayal Field Development Project, Kakinada,India Client: Punj Lloyd Limited Study involved detailed hydrodynamic wave conditions during extreme weather, morphological and littoral drift transport modeling to provide the burial depth for the proposed gas pipeline route in Kakinada India.Provided estimation for required amount of dredging, as well as amount of rock-fill material. HOCHTIEF Offshore Development 1-4(HTOD 1-4) Met-ocean Study,Germany Client: HOCHTIEF Offshore Development Solutions Conducted detailed mathematical modeling study to deliver met- ocean parameters of water levels, currents, waves,temperature and salinity relevant to creating a design basis (in the frame of BSH's (Maritime and Hydrographic Agency)first approval). S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Orestes Betancourt Mr.Betancourt has over 20 years of experience in site/civil engineering Senior Civil Designer and has completed projects for a variety of sites including hotels, condominiums, marinas, resorts, industrial/commercial areas,and parks. He regularly coordinates with project consultants including architects, Education engineers and mechanical/electrical/plumbing(MEP)to ensure consistent site/civil design with project requirements. Bachelor of Arts, Construction Management Florida International University, Miami, Florida Mr.Betancourt provides design and construction administration services associated with site civil and utility projects undertaken by Coastal Associate in Arts, Engineering Systems.He has provided civil design,construction inspections,field Miami Dade Community College, Miami, Florida surveys and planning layouts for numerous site/civil and permitting projects throughout South Florida and the Caribbean.Mr.Betancourt conducts inspections and interacts with contractors to ensure the project is completed according to design plans and specifications.Annually he prepares and processes approximately six to ten site plans for developments in South Florida.These plans include civil engineering designs for water distribution,sanitary sewer, paving, grading, irrigation and stormwater management facilities.His stormwater management design experience includes the use of best management practices as well as injection wells and exfiltration trenches. Selected Relevant Experience Bayfront Street Ends Improvements,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Bulkhead design and environmental permitting for street ends at South Shore Drive, 10th Street, 14th Street, Lincoln Road as well as Island View Park.Streetscape design for street ends at South Shore Drive, 10th Street and Lincoln Road to improve upland access to the waterfront. Paving, grading, drainage lighting and landscape/ hardscape improvements. Beachwalk,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Civil/coastal engineering design and environmental permitting for the 4,000 foot on grade paver walkway that connects Lummus Park north to 21st Street in the South Beach district of Miami Beach, along with associated amenities and landscaping. North Beach Recreational Corridor(NBRC),Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:City of Miami Beach Site/Civil engineering services include paving and grading for 6,700 linear feet of multi-purpose public access corridor to traverse along the western edge of the beach dunes between 64th Street and 79th Street. Design includes dune enhancements, landscaping, electrical and water service for irrigation. South Pointe Park,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT:Hargreaves and Associates Civil design and coastal/environmental permitting of a multi-purpose recreational park area for structural, hardscape, and landscape improvements in excess of 16 acres.Activities include the construction of a main park structure with offices/concession/restrooms, a storage facility for park vehicles, a raised serpentine walkway, and playground TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM facilities. S+A I ARUP I GLAND CSS_ RESUMES Adriana Cabrera Ms. Cabrera provides a range of services to public and private Environmental/Permitting Dept. Head clients in her role as Environmental/Permitting Department Head.Her responsibilities include coordination with project teams and regulatory agencies relative to code compliance requirements for securing EDUCATION environmental permit approvals at local,county,state,and federal levels. Bachelor of Arts, Marine Affairs and Ocean Policy, She specifically manages projects involving coastal and environmental University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida permit applications, marine turtle lighting permit applications and other specialized regulatory agency requirements. Master of Arts, Marine Affairs and Policy University of Miami— Rosenstiel School of Marine Ms.Cabrera's project management responsibilities include coordination and Atmospheric Science, Miami, Florida and review of project design plans, and other technical/legal data to determine a project's scope of work, including the elements required to Florida Coastal and Wetlands Master Naturalist efficiently obtain environmental and construction permits.She also assists project teams in facilitating project design relative to code compliance and Professional Affiliations permit issuance.In addition, Ms.Cabrera applies her experience to the Association of States Floodplain Managers evaluation of technical and legal data required to effectively determine the Florida Floodplain Manager Association feasibility of proposed projects and facilitate their implementation.She also South Florida Association of Environmental coordinates project teams for coastal and waterfront development projects; Professionals including design professionals,technical disciplines, and legal counsel. Certifications She has an in-depth understanding of many regulations and procedures DEP Qualified Stormwater Management Inspector governing coastal construction,and has established relationships with Certified Floodplain Manager key regulatory agency personnel to expedite processing.Ms.Cabrera is accustomed to tight schedules and regularly coordinates teams of architects,engineers, scientist and environmental attorneys. Selected Relevant Experience Seville Redevelopment and Beachwalk Extension,Miami Beach CLIENT:Marriott International Design and Construction Services Provided environmental services for the redevelopment of the historic Seville site,which included the construction of a 5 story, 30 unit hotel inclusive of a seaward 2 story cabana structure, swimming pools, spa building, and wood cabanas.As well as the replacement of the existing City boardwalk with an on-grade paver-on-sand pedestrian path. Obtained environmental resource permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection that included lighting review from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. National Hotel,Miami Beach,Florida(272004) CLIENT:New National, LLC Obtained FDEP Coastal Construction and CCCL Permits for the hotel improvements located at 1677 Collins Ave. Improvements included cabana structure, Airstream trailer, and expansion of an additional building.Reviewed structural design elements for compliance with FBC coastal regulations.Also processed marine turtle lighting review compliance. facilities. The Crown Hotel,Miami Beach,Florida Redevelopment of historic structure with condominium/hotel units. Provided coastal and civil permitting services for site redevelopment. Also provided Florida Building Code (FBC)and City Code compliance reviews.Services are estimated to complete mid-2015. S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 Ms IIIRRIOMIMIMMI 1 U I !, I:1 j .1 1. � ,, Stil , 9.711 * III ,;. R I 4 .4... . . . i, ,..... i .�v.w , -��r r ,-- ' 111 II II ..,,t,„..._;...ie, - - - -17 .-`;-.:" 1 I I , zobaaL CAPRI SOUTH BEACH,MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA Coastal Systems provided design services to improve the right- of-way for 16th Street and Lincoln Terrace street ends as part of the Capri South Beach Project. Capri South Beach encompasses three (3) distinctive t Mbuildings on nearly 500 feet of waterfront on Biscayne Bay. One of the , �'• t, three buildings located at 1491 Lincoln Terrace Street was designated as L ,I •. a `- historic and renovated during this Capri Residential Redevelopment. I F-rm-+��- The $2M in streetscape improvements included decorative pavers along a.,i with parking, sidewalks and landscaping to accommodate adjacent residences as part of the overall neighborhood improvements. The ull Lincoln Terrace street end is approximately 325 feet long and required a 1 12-inch water main extension. Similarly, the 16th Street extension A" 'tist.. ' required an 8-inch water main extension and slip lining of an existing 8- r1 ' inch sanitary sewer line. Both street ends were low in elevation and . i , r adjacent to the bay and presented challenges for the drainage design. � Detailed topographic surveys were obtained to determine the drainage { ' 3 areas and an inverted-crown configuration was selected. Both street ends were low in elevation and adjacent to the bay and CLIENT; presented challenges for the drainage design. Detailed topographic Ms.Mae Siff in surveys were obtained to determine the drainage area for the right-of- Maefield Demebpment way for use in the hydrology study. Several options were evaluated and 250 East 96 Street,Suite 580 Indianapolis, hdana 46240 an inverted-crown configuration for the street ends was selected. Tel: (317)805-0707 Fax: 17-07.77 E-mail: mmsiffin(aaol.com The drainage improvements included the design of stormwater pumping stations connected to outfalls with associated controls and structures. PROJECT SCHEDULE Standards were developed for this project in the City Right-Of-Way for 2005.2008 outfalls to the bay that include tideflex values. These check values along with the pumping system facilitate stormwater management for the city. The resulting design—outfall connection structure with Tideflex valve along with pump station—is currently the City of Miami Beach Standard. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND CSI RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 4 a hir—woonors"^r-r•-r-v r + ' 311ETtsar �r/r*nr-sr r-v-•r- :�e -�._ "'3rT"i"Aiir,'E+sr i^rlrf:ik-'if" gig r? at2zia lung 'r_.f"-w"°f �^ .. '. _�?i'_.r iff. ^11W i7Tr'f'r :,' SIM is—ssr r • 41.418/1tllwfOWV".Mar w # 1" ''fir'" 1. �-,p+ •� L.•" Seville Redevelopment and Beachwalk Extension,Miami Beach,Florida CLIENT: Marriott International, Inc. The Seville Redevelopment is an historic site that went under Richael S.Canpbell p 10400 Fernwood Road complete renovation, located in the prime section of Collins Avenue, (301)380-5532 within the City of Miami Beach. As part of the improvements, the Bethesda,NDei 20817 nwri scopeof services included the construction of a 5 story, 30 unit hotel rrike.carrpbell@marriott.com inclusive of a seaward 2 story cabana structure, swimming pools, spa PROJECT SCHEDULE: building, and wood cabanas. The renovations had to be completed 2009-2015 within the confines of the sites existing footprint. In addition, a replacement of the existing City boardwalk including an on-grade paver-on-sand pedestrian path. Coastal Systems provided coastal permitting environmental permitting services including securing a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) which included: the 5-story bulling, improvements within the historic building, additional wood deck areas around the pool decks and bar space,increased footprint of cabanas and material, concrete stairs around the pool deck area,landscape, excavation and fill, grading, exterior and landscape lighting and beachwalk pedestrian path. To mitigate the impact to the endangered nesting marine turtles, Coastal Systems provided exterior building and landscape lighting plans, and obtained Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC)exterior lighting approval. Coastal Systems consulted on the City/FEMA floodplain management compliance and proposed improvements within the historic building. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 iialitilallal a pii t P:i t- .,� i.rr�'...r iii.,. 4 ,,.... . ,. .. .,.., ,,,,,,,. ., --.. • s 9^, ele.11.1111 MINII :4:11111111 Inas ill illp�� .w OM /AIM MUIII Mil IIII i , i„,r .. i „...., ,_.„....„ , .. ....,... SOUTH OF FIFTH CONDO,CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA - -. -. The South of Fifth condominiums are located in the heart of Ocean Drive, within the City of Miami Beach. The low rise development provides 7 buildings with a total of 28 residences. A swimming pool, spa,and fitness center among the many amenities offered within the 1 'r '/4 acres site overlooking the Atlantic Ocean. .,1'44111**11 1 N ,� Coastal Systems provided civil engineering engineering for the historic design layout for all water, sanitary sewer and stormwater systems. Coastal Systems prepared design drawings identifying all paving, grading, and drainage systems for the site. Relocation of the exfiltration trenches along the north and south edge of the property line. Perimeter site grades were shown from the main system to within five feet of the building as well as the grading within the • footprint of the building. Coastal System provided coastal environmental permitting services for the site, securing a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) rY ' .,.:- permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)and a DEP Joint Coastal Permit for the placement of sand off- site, within the nearby dune system. In addition, Coastal Systems obtained Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission(FWC) SF1 BR SFI BR V LLA LUISA LLC c/o George I-Ielmstetter exterior lighting approvaL Due to the development's close proximity iStar Financial Inc. to the marine turtle nesting beach, special considerations were made Avenue fthe Americas New York,NewwYork 10036(305)757- pertaining to the type and position of the fixture to minimize the light New 0001 source from becoming visible from the nesting beach. PROJECT SCHEDULE As part of the DEP CCCL permit application process, Coastal 2004-2014 Systems provided engineering modeling services that determined the anticipated site specific impacts of a 100-year storm event. This analysis provided the anticipated wave crest height, as well as the eroded profile. In addition,Coastal Systems reviewed the structural design elements for compliance with Florida Building Code coastal regulations as interpreted and implemented by the City of Miami Beach. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND CSI RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ,re ,,.°Y 114;;,,,tr... ''''' * ,,52.1-0.---• _t t , ,,, ,, ' ',.: .::.*"": ' t. . 111- ...... „ w .. isi la 00 THE CLEVELANDER HOTEL, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA The Clevelander Hotel is located at 1020 Ocean Drive in the center of :4:;y the Art Deco District in the City of Miami Beach. The renovation :; Z � activities included the addition of a 4-story, 9-unit building to the :. e. -'f"i existing hotel,with a new courtyard area that included a bar,free-form pond and covered terrace. - -- boa 'i*-, Coastal System provided coastal environmental permitting services for the site, securing a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for the renovation activities. Coastal Systems also obtained Florida Fish CLIENT andWildlife Conservation Commissionapproval Investment Group (FWC) of the Mr.Jonathan Neeley proposed exterior lighting, including hotel signage. The development Brio Investment Group was uniquely situated adjacent to the marine turtle nesting beach, 380 Washington Avenue North, Suite 204 which created special lighting considerations to minimize potential Ketchum,Idaho 83340 impacts to the nesting beach. (208)725-4040 jneeley@brioinvestmentgroup.com Coastal Systems also provided civil engineering services for the PROJECT SCHEDULE renovations that included a new drainage system, water and sewer 12/2006—06i2009 services,site grading and replacement of public sidewalks. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 ift q1Ell ;Nil MI v ,.. f/il`'r ., 1111 jallrlAir iif i4I ' ilir-4:- II . 1-it .., ili i .tiliglii.':. ,. o •▪ M .... . ww w f4 " . :. '" JAMES ROYAL PALM,CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 11111 n1w ! '1; i va �i 'e- : �+d ' , . The James Miami Royal Palm Hotel is located within the City of ` ' '"= '' ' I Miami Beach. The historic site was redeveloped in 1997 to include a rx.n :s:e: '' 4 1.. •. ii 15 story, 16 story, and 3 story hotel tower with two swimming pools, "=•: "n r 4°' :. = spa, terrace pool bar, landscape, hardscape, and exterior lightingn n :eps ; a : I _: " C llI: w ; „ in „4 " activities, overlooking the Atlantic Ocean. The site was improved in },, :: ::; " "„" , 2012 to include a new pool,plunge pool and on grade pool deck area 1p � " m ;. �. ® ; ; ' �, with improved landscape,hardscape,and exterior lighting activities. , Coastal Systems provided coastal environmental permitting services 46 at.'' • ' ' '' ---'; II �t- yfor the site. Coastal Systems secured a Coastal Construction Control - M �'f`"�` Line (CCCL) permit from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(DEP). In addition, Coastal Systems obtained a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) exterior lighting I �1 �Q approval The development is uniquely situated facing the beach, CL1ENT which created special lighting considerations pertaining to the type of RP Hotel Holdings,LLC fixture and position to minimize the light source from becoming NF.Bryan Bliott visible from the nesting beach. 100 Fillmore Street, Suite 600 Denver,CO 80208 Coastal Systems also provided civil engineering services for the (720)2846400 project that included an inflitration system design to improve the Byran.8liott@kslcapital.com existing drainage system. Drainage calculations were prepared to meet the stringent water quality treatment criteria established by the DEP PROJECT SCHEDULE: for coastal projects. The oceanfront site has extensive impervious area 2011-2014 and associated improvements, with minimal area for stormwater management infrastructure. Coastal Systems developed a unique design utilizing a system of interconnected concrete vaults that are bottomless in lieu of the conventional seepage trench systems commonly utilized in South Florida. The vaults provide the required storage and treatment for the design rainfall event. In addition, the surface pavement was replaced with permeable pavers to further reduce runoff and to enhance percolation. Construction plans and specifications were prepared. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND CSI RELEVANT EXPERIENCE W ,,, -„: 'fi t' ,�i i 41116 , `-t s ' s s-a-..t `-•. ti "ft, 2 • „obi I r (1, .fir t,'.P-,.-:.. fy.j�. CLIENT: .. %•7 RP Hotel Holdings,LLC • Crescent Heights 1*.Ian Kramer 600 ALTON ROAD, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 2200 Biscayne Boulevard Coastal Systems provided civil engineering design and coordination ( 05)374-57000 � � development74. 7037 (3305) for the proposed site located at 600 Alton Road within ikramer@crescentheights.com the City of Miami Beach. The proposed site development consisted of two city blocks retail plazas covering the entire ground floor,elevating PROJECT SCHEDULE the roads, sidewalks, and widening the narrow Public Right of Way ongoing with sidewalk easements. The conceptual Right of Way improvement has been approved by the City of Miami Beach Public Works to be constructed together with the drainage improvement and FDOT Alton Road Improvements. Coastal Systems provided site civil engineering services and coordination with the design team to establish Finished Floor Elevation of the retail space on the Ground Floor for the Planning Board Review process, prepared the site civil portion of the Basis of Design Report (BODR), prepared a proposed utility demand load for water and sewer based on the architectural site plan, met with the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department to review the capacity of the City's infrastructure and determined if upgrades were required. Coastal Systems prepared a Master Site Civil Plan to illustrate the Utilities services points of connections with the existing utilities and any upgrades as required by the City to service the Project. The Master Plan also illustrated the necessary inipiovements within the City of Miami Beach and FDOT Right of Way adjacent to the project site. Coastal Systems produced an extended conceptual design associated with elevation of the West Ave. street and sidewalks to approximate elevation +5.25 to 5.5', including definition of the potential north and west extent of required harmonization and associated potential modifications to existing driveways and other features adjacent to the sidewalk. The project team reviewed several locations with the Miami-Dade County Traffic Division(MDCTD) to properly relocate an existing bus stop to avoid traffic conflicts and to provide the best service to the neighbors and the visitors. Coastal Systems participated in the preliminary design review with the MDCTD. The 600 Alton open plaza is being designed with electronic information boards to display the bus schedules and a countdown to arrival Open clear spaces on sidewalks are proposed adjacent to the bus stop, along with shade with canopy landscape,and seating areas. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 ter ,... a1 , r— �; 4 I 1 I. ... R.; .... .3 t '''' + ' k+ 1. 1 1k +R ., fir % •`,t',t Il toir.„.li j _ ;" axiitt CAPRI SOUTH BEACH,MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA iikliii Coastal Systems provided design services to improve the right- of-way for 166 Street and Lincoln Terrace street ends as part of the Capri South } Beach Project. Capri South Beach encompasses three (3) distinctive • t Y buildings on nearly 500 feet of waterfront on Biscayne Bay. One of the three buildings located at 1491 Lincoln Terrace Street was designated as i E ,;, historic and renovated during this Capri Residential Redevelopment. y, I 'I The $2M in streetscape improvements included decorative pavers along # I`4. with parking, sidewalks and landscaping to accommodate adjacent residences as part of the overall neighborhood improvements. The Lincoln Terrace street end is approximately 325 feet long and required a Ia,. , 12-inch water main extension. Similarly, the 16th Street extension •, required an 8-inch water main extension and slip lining of an existing 8- !1: ' inch sanitary sewer line. Both street ends were low in elevation and 4 r 0 adjacent to the bay and presented challenges for the drainage design. Detailed topographic surveys were obtained to determine the drainage Oirit areas and an inverted-crown configuration was selected. Both street ends were low in elevation and adjacent to the bay and CLIENT: presented challenges for the drainage design. Detailed topographic Ms.Mae Sitfin surveys were obtained to determine the drainage area for the right-of- Maef ld De vebpment way for use in the hydrology study. Several options were evaluated and 250 East East 96 Street,Suite 580 Indianapolis, ndiana 46240 an inverted-crown configuration for the street ends was selected. Tel: (317)805-0707 Fax:(317)317-0777 E-mail: mmsrFfin(oaol.com The drainage improvements included the design of stormwater pumping stations connected to outfalls with associated controls and structures. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Standards were developed for this project in the City Right-Of-Way for 2005-2008 outfalls to the bay that include tideflex values. These check values along with the pumping system facilitate stormwater management for the city. The resulting design-outfall connection structure with Tideflex valve along with pump station—is currently the City of Miami Beach Standard. Coastal,Environmental,Civil Engineering and Management TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND CSI RELEVANT EXPERIENCE S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 • ` is c'S ©OOSENMOVERS RAISE • RELQCAITE -RERAN Building Elevation Consultant SJ Hauck House Movers (SJHH) References SJ Hauck has almost 35 years in the house moving and Roderick Scott, CFM lifting industry. Over those 35 years, SJ Hauck has lifted Flood Hazard Mitigation Specialist and moved some of the largest and heaviest structures in L& R Resources, LLC the United States.As a result of that, along with our ground 985-273.9590 breaking and innovative lifting techniques, SJ Hauck has won multiple national and international awards and our Cynthia A. Addonizio-Bianco AICP, PP, CFM, LEED AP Owner and President, Steve Hauck II currently sits as a BD+C board member on the International Association of Structural Community Resilience Program Manager TetraTech Movers. 1-973-630-8044 Originally based out of South Jersey, over the years we Contractors in New Jersey: have expanded our reach to the entire East Coast.Whether Len Foglio it's lifting and moving structures in states like NJ/PA/NY, 609-827-4424 conducting cost benefit analysis for FEMA and others in NJ/ NYNA, to consulting with the City of Miami and Norfolk. John Bewley(Ocean Side Renovations) 609-214-2733 Throughout our history here at SJ Hauck, we have worked tirelessly to keep homeowners and property safe from the Scott Haliday(Halliday Leonard General Contractors) encroaching flood waters. Steve Hauck and Sean O'Leary 609-425-8138 have been studying the many grant programs offered through the federal government over the years.With our experience, Customers in New Jersey: we feel that SJ Hauck offers South Florida expertise that Carol Shelly cannot be matched by others. 801 Bay Avenue,Tom's River (646) 522-4954 • Assisted Ocean City NJ in developing building codes regarding house lifts after Hurricane Sandy. Jim Graham • Assisted Ocean City NJ in developing building codes 10 East 53rd Street, Ocean City regarding house lifts after Hurricane Sandy. (321)243-5040 • Conducted over 30 House Lifting Workshops throughout the state of New Jersey to educate home owners on the Kate Karins house lifting process. 216 N. Lancaster Avenue, Margate • Worked with multiple New Jersey townships to develop (609) 822-4752 yearly hazard mitigation grant programs. • Assisted Ocean City NJ in developing building codes Chris& Michele Purnell regarding house lifts after Hurricane Sandy. 8504 Amherst Avenue, Margate • Conducted over 30 House Lifting Workshops throughout (215) 872-9102 (Chris) the state of New Jersey to educate home owners on the (215) 872-9284 (Michele) house lifting process. • Worked with multiple New Jersey townships to develop John & Daisy Kearns yearly hazard mitigation grant programs. 103 26th Street, Brigantine •Assisted Habitat for Humanity by moving a donated home (646) 335-5460 for a Hurricane Sandy victim. •Assisted grant writers in multiple states to conduct feasibility John Baer studies regarding lifting homes. 14 E.52nd Street, Ocean City • Featured in numerous news articles throughout the years (215) 801-5516 •Won 4 IASM Awards 2010—Most Innovative Move Herb Juliano 2014—Best Time Saving Device 5402 Edgewater Ave,Ventnor 2016—Heaviest Structure Moved 609-487-9596 2017—Heaviest Structure Moved TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I OLAND SJHH RESUMES STEVEN J . HAUCK I 625 Pennsylvania Ave Somers Point,NJ 08244 609-402-2011 S1@welifthouses.com SUMMARY Second generation Home Elevation Contractor with 17 years of experience lifting and moving structures,and General Contracting in residential and commercial construction.Purchased the family business in 2013 and became owner and president of the company.Over 1,000 homes lifted since 2013.Over 240 homes lifted in 2016.Si Hauck House Movers is the Largest Turnkey House lifting Company in NJ with a division in Long Island NY. Expert and noted speaker in Home elevation industry.Sought out by various organizations to assist in Cost analysis and legislation reform related to home elevation.Recently visited Miami Beach FL to assist in two home elevation workshops,meet with various developers,investors,and the Miami Beach zoning board about home elevation as a solution to flood mitigation. KEY SKILLS AND ACHIEVEMENTS •One of 12 members on the board of the International Association of Structural Movers - IASM is the primary source for information and education in the Structural Moving Industry - IASM Deals with critical issues in regard to industry as a whole.Analyzes trends and responses where structural moving/lifting is in demand •Worked with the NJ Division Of Consumer Affairs to create proper legislation for the House lifting Industry •Presented a seminar at the National Appraiser's Convention this year as an expert on Home Elevation •Invited to speak at the National Flood Plain Manager's Conference in October as an expert on Home Elevation •Created a streamlined cost analysis and feasibility worksheet for FEMA to do studies on 18,000 severe repetitive loss and repetitive loss homes in NJ •Worked with various grant administering companies such as Tetra Tech,to assist in feasibility studies for different towns and structures across the East Coast -Hold on average 25 Community wide Workshops per year.Often team up with different municipalities to hold these workshops.Specifically,municipalities either receiving a grant or working on adopting proper guidelines and legislation. Hold minimum of 1 community workshop per month. •Rolled the 150 ton Liberty Island Canopy over the water 150 ft.in 2013 •Won 4 lnternational Awards: S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 I I ,,_..,.r_.....__:::,.... ,.., ..,__tf....--..--:._ ,.......__.,_,,,.,,,._..,.,''''' . , n a '.-. •n,. 1ope, ► n P ' � .� ' 1#1'111 11111111111 1111111111IIIIIIII1�Illllilb.��, Ai '',. ._ .:.,j , P. 1 tr, / .41:1.•1 .... .-r7 - , ii _ _ ____. . : .., ,,,,,, .; . . : . . ,,,,r...._,:4, I--: : -= 7 --. ..1.• 14,1 I — , -..... i t • -.'tpt'"g ...17,414-74-4=,--k14.7*„� . _. _ • _ ,P µ .,-- I Y r 1 Ai IIS ir 1.1 ..v •, - oa. -_..__ ��.a i�"�flltlflt 1 P Gb(! w.: -• - ilil,: + i r y y _ Ham-- ” _ < TAB 2 I 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM S+A I ARUP I DLAND SJHH RELEVANT EXPERIENCE r F r _ • ;- .. gi';, r tip 1.'7; 'd' 4. / w41 Sib -i \\\`l iE Aiii ra Es I = 11 • ..." r.q•.".at ,..: a Mk i T .. 1--,4-- " t r te.d .... -.2.,,../;%. O :S r,a, T ,-• -. ko fr a .11.4 — ' S+A I ARUP I DLAND 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM I TAB 2 3 . 0 APPROACELAND METHODOLOGY The primary challenge inherent in the creation of resiliency guidelines for the historic districts of Miami Beach is the balancing of historical identity with necessary improvements. While the issues of protecting historic resources in Miami Beach may seem tactical,they are in fact strategic and planning oriented.They should be considered carefully, as they will serve as a case study for future efforts internationally. Although much work has been done in the evaluation of historic resources of Miami Beach,the current project requires the development of new ways to query the historical characteristics of the subject area and guide decisions on preservation and planning. Rooted in the rich history of Miami Beach and enriched by cutting-edge resiliency planning experience in New York, New Orleans and around the globe, the S+A team will approach this project with an unparalleled depth of knowledge from which to draw. We understand inherently that no one size fits all conditions in Miami Beach. Differences in topography (elevation), underlying makeup of terrain, building age, structural makeup and materiality, degrees of significance, value, and ongoing improvements all impact potential methodologies for the development of resiliency guidelines here. We must consider the intrinsic value of Miami Beach's historic buildings and sites; its real estate and the fundamental elements that create value—a commitment to constant improvement and reinvention in partnership with the City, its residents and property owners. S+A has been considering and weighing the ideas of resiliency, adaptive reuse, urban design and the evolution of Miami Beach for the past 22 years, completing projects including additions and modifications to contributing commercial, hospitality and residential buildings throughout Miami Beach. In addition, it was recognized that the value of cutting edge resiliency ideas and concepts being generated around the world can positively impact and be successfully implemented and so our team includes Arup and dlandstudio. Both firms bring a focused energy and depth of resources on the subject matter of rising sea levels and the built environment. The team is completed by local firms YHCE and CSI to ensure viable and implementable solutions are sought. Miami Beach planning processes have long taken history and historical preservation into account. Building character, culture and meaning, and their relevance to the City as a whole, are evaluated on a case-by-case basis through highly codified processes.Yet,climate events and sea-level rise will increasingly challenge developers and city officials to consider creative reuse of the city's existing structures. Upon the implementation of resiliency guidelines, Miami Beach will be primed to lead other major coastal cities across the world that are seeking viable responses to the inevitability of sea level rise and the impacts on the urban environment. S+A I ARUP I DLAND APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY I TAB 3 3 ._0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY t • ,a d�r..,•. :.r�►r ..:. s_ '_. ' j . { i . t • s. _ ";,r. A 4 t - 4 _-•_-. Jac,+_, _ c." >t --:if • t: -.,Y *- , ;-- , r � te _ r w t Vit. , .........._____:„..,- . .• , -, •• . ..„____ • , •• _ • ., - , ........_-_-: _ sa .. ,....J...--, ,,_-- ,....- t ._ , • telagueq ,. .,..„:,=::-. • _- : ...• ,...._ . - - A Likr. • ":„:, 4. ♦1-+ ... .44, 4 " ., :13):7-' t .:11 e .e r 1' „�'- /fir'+ � '�-' � 'f * a _�` s'".r a . S , :___....., 7„,,,49.16,..,,, G ,i ' - �' _ ' . 's."' 73. ..ter �y i ,1,,....."1,':im.:::*_::::.-11:i'-:---.10.—,..-L...... c .. Y - . Y y • s , • , * j''''''*".I'P''-,,-. 1i„Lit?. lgent 4" . FR1.,. y�/�r�`' .♦ _ � - am. !� _ i VI^ TAB 3 I APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY S+A I ARUP I DLAND 3 _APPROACH_ AND METHODOLOGY Methodology: It is the S+A Team's understanding that the districts to be addressed first in a pilot phase are the Flamingo Park Historic District (City of Miami Beach, 1990) and the Museum Historic District (NR, 2011). Based on the information currently available, the S+A Team anticipates the following activities: 1. Research, Due Diligence and Analysis: One of the major challenges inherent in the creation of resiliency guidelines for the historic districts of Miami Beach is the balancing of historical identity with necessary improvements. As such,an in depth understanding of the inventory of contributing structures, and their importance within the context of the Historic District in which they reside, is a critical component. The S+A team would conduct analysis of the existing Designation Reports, inventory analysis of modifications to structures considered contributing, and review of the current status of the Districts as a whole and their integrity. In addition, review of the existing language within the reports as they relate to other urban planning strategies such as height, massing and architectural features may inform the solution since many resiliency strategies such as raising of structures may ultimately adjust many of the actual elements important to the integrity of the District. For example, courtyard buildings and their relationship to the public right of way was historically a conjoined experience, with waterfall stepping of plans and wrapping corner windows drawing the public experience into the courtyard experience. Analysis of different approaches to yard and courtyard heights and the relationship to street and sidewalk heights could drastically affect the continuity of this concept. Although much work has been done in the evaluation of historic resources of Miami Beach, the current project requires the development of new ways to query the historical characteristics of the subject area and guide decisions on preservation and planning. Having an intensive understanding of the historic importance of the Districts will inform the solutions and strengthen implementation.Activities of this phase will include: a. Mapping b. Archival research c. Urban design and urban morphology analysis d. Sectional analyses of current context e. Space syntax analysis f. Landscape analysis g. Direct observation of existing conditions h. Building code analysis with regard to the current challenges i. FHA/ADA analysis with regard to the current challenges j. Zoning analysis with regard to the current challenges k. Appraisal of historic significance of historic properties (generally) in the areas affected, and determination of options designed to retain significance. 1. Incorporate YHCE/Miller Legg study results I. Explore technical models of adaptation/mitigation S+A I ARUP I DLAND APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY I TAB 3 3 . 0 APPROACH_ AND METHODOLOGY 2. Public Process and Stakeholder Engagement The S+A team will participate in City of Miami Beach Board hearings and respond to public, City and Board comments.We anticipate that the resiliency guidelines would need to be heard before the Historic Preservation Board, Planning Board, Land Use Committee and the full City Commission. 4. Toolkit The team will develop planning and design tools for describing intended design outcomes through: a. Design workshops c. Concept plan d. Action plan e. Design brief f. Design guidelines for particular building typologies g. Masterplan h. Streetscape plan i. Structure plan j. Technical guidance note Major Considerations During the Creation of the Guidelines • Defining the urban contextual solution including but not limited to massing, height, density, street level uses • Defining strategies for the adaptive reuse, restoration, raising or additions to contributing buildings. • Understanding the impacts of new construction and infill on the historic neighborhoods. • Defining public right-of-way strategies including landscape, sidewalks, drainage systems etc. • Accommodating Miami Beach's continued growth and reinvention Implementation An important part of the creation of successful guidelines includes a view to successful realization. The S+A team is well equipped to study methodologies for impactful implementation of the guidelines, with experience in planning, designing and constructing resiliency strategies in other flood prone and coastal impacted neighborhoods. The team can bring such expertise to the exploration of the impacts of phasing, timelines for implementation, planning incentives and restrictions, and also have a long history and deep understanding of the structure and relationships within the City of Miami Beach to facilitate a solution involving multiple departments and different levels of government. TAB3 I APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY S+A I ARUP I 01AND