Loading...
RESOLUTION 90-20037 RESOLUTION NO. 90-20037 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR, AND AUTHORIZING FILING OF, A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR YEAR SIXTEEN UNDER THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED; THE 1983 URBAN-RURAL RECOVERY ACT; AND THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1987 . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: WHEREAS, two public hearings were held by the City of Miami Beach Community Development Advisory Committee on March 6, 1990, to obtain views and proposals of citizens at the initial stage of the development of the "Proposed Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" , as well as to assess the performance of the prior program year; and WHEREAS, all requests for funding proposals were reviewed and analyzed by the City Administration, and the Community Development Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, the Miami Beach City Commission on July 11, 1990, held and conducted a public hearing to obtain views of citizens relative to the "Proposed Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" , as well as the Housing Assistance Plan, to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by the City of Miami Beach for the Year Sixteen funds, under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 , as amended; the 1983 Urban-Rural Recovery Act; as well as the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 ; and WHEREAS, the Year Sixteen "Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" includes the use of $109 , 264 in re- programmed prior year funds, of which $38 , 000 was reprogrammed to the same line item. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that said City Commission hereby approves the filing of the Year Sixteen "Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" which includes the required plan to mitigate adverse effects of CDBG-caused displacement, as well as the Housing Assistance Plan, with the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development for Community Development Block Grant funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 , as amended; the 1983 Urban-Rural Recovery Act; and the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 ; and further authorizes the City Manager to execute and file said application in a timely manner to comply with applicable regulations for, and on behalf of, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, for $2 , 318 , 014 in total resources. (Entitlement allocation @ $1, 771, 000 , reprogrammed funds @ $109, 264 of which $38 , 000 was reprogrammed to the same line item, and program income @ $437 , 750 of which $14 , 000 is available for Year 16 projects. ) PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th day of _July 1990. ATTEST: A (Pr/ MAYOR i.12A • Coeetoeva 4)22 CITY CLERK FORM APPROVED LEG L DEPT By r Date a etre, Niaoti Fead PMi'eEq,,, FLORIDA 3 3 1 3 9 [ i - {INCORORATED)*; V A CA T'IONL,4 ND U. S. A. OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL ROB W.PARKINS 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE CITY MANAGER TELEPHONE: 673-7010 COMMISSION MEMORANriCDUM NO. N DATE: July 11 , 1990 TO: Mayor Alex Daoud and Members of the Ci ommission („7\f'' Lam . ;FROM: Rob W. Parkins- c-4 City Manager SUBJECT: YEAR SIXTEEN (16) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES & PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is federally funded through the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . The legislation for the program was created in 1974 under the Housing and Community Development Act and subsequently amended. The statutory national objectives of the program are to: 1) principally benefit low and moderate income persons, 2) aid in the prevention and elimination of slums or blight, and 3) address a certified urgent need. Certain new requirements were added by the adoption of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 . Of principal note is the requirement to benefit low and moderate income persons by at least 60%. Additionally, there are changes in the regulations governing: citizen participation, anti- displacement, one-for-one replacement housing, and eligible activities. Our Year 16 entitlement allocation is $1, 771, 000. Year 16 will commence October 1, 1990 and conclude September 30, 1991. The Year 16 "Proposed Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" identifies $1, 894, 264 in available CDBG resources for Year 16 projects. This total reflects $1, 771, 000 in Year 16 entitlement funds, $109, 264 in funds reprogrammed from prior years funds, and $14 , 000 in program income available for Year 16 projects. Reprogrammed funds come from prior year projects which have been completed; have not started; have been dropped for various reasons; or are projects in which funds are being rolled forward in the same budget category but, for accounting and program management purposes, are made available as Year 16 funds. The Community Development staff and the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) began the planning process for the Year 16 program on March 6, 1990. At that time, two public hearings were held to assess the performance of the prior program year, as well as to obtain public views and proposals by citizens at the initial stage of the development of the "Proposed Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" . A total of 26 requests for funding were submitted by City and outside agencies. Eight (8) meetings were held for the purpose of reviewing proposals. It should be noted that the individual projects and the allocation of funds identified in the "Proposed Statement of Objectives and 10 AGENDA ITEM DATE 7 - 11 - 9C COMMISSION MEMO PAGE 2 Projected Use of Funds" are submitted with separate recommendations in nine (9) line items. These differences are outlined as follows: PUBLIC SERVICES - The CDAC proposes to abolish i.e. recommends "0" funding for three existing Public Service programs: 1) Stanley C. Myers Health Center - Administration recommendation is @ $25, 000, 2) Mount Sinai Outreach Program - Administration recommendation is @ $18, 000, and 3) Miami Beach Assistance Program - Administration recommendation is @ $30, 000. The Administration strongly recommends the continued funding support for these essential services to our elderly and low/moderate income citizens. MULTI-UNIT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - The CDAC' s recommended budget @ $248, 578 for the City' s Multi-Unit Rehabilitation Program is a decrease @ 11% from the current funding level, and will substantially reduce the number of rehabilitated housing units, hindering the program' s momentum and effectiveness. The Administration' s recommendation @ $301, 578 , although still insufficient, will allow the program to continue without a loss of momentum, allow for continued marketing, and a higher number of rehabilitated housing units produced in the target areas. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - In a deficit funding year, the CDAC proposes to increase the funding level for three economic development sub- recipients, as follows: 1) North Shore Development Corp. - @ $93 , 000 (a 54% increase) - the Administration' s recommendation is at the current funding level of $60, 000, 2) Miami Beach Development Corp. - @ $525, 000 (an 18% increase) - the Administration' s recommendation is at the current funding level of $447 , 000, and 3) South Florida Art Center - @ $300, 000 (a 5% increase) - the Administration' s recommendation is at the current funding level of $285, 000. The Administration' s recommendation for the above sub- recipients at the current funding level, allows them to maintain their existing operational capacity with no loss of administrative funds. This is a very difficult year due to the limited resources available. This was due to a 6% Federal budget cut to the CDBG Program. A concerted effort was made to reconcile the line item differences in the budget with CDAC; however, this was not possible. The Administration feels strongly that its recommended budget is the most fair and equitable budget that will allow for current services to be maintained, with no real hardship on any individual agency or project. Despite the budget shortfall, under the Administration' s recommendation, no sub-recipient in the Economic Development category i.e. North Shore Development Corporation, South Florida Art Center and the Miami Beach Development Corporation, will lose any of their current operational/administrative funds. Formal Commission action to approve filing a "Final Statement" is requested at this meeting. This approval must occur no later than the July 25, 1990 Commission meeting. Please note that this Public Hearing is required to provide an opportunity for final citizen comment on the appropriateness of this ',Proposed Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds”. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends consideration of public comments and approval of the Year 16 "Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" , which includes: the required plan to mitigate adverse effects of CDBG-caused displacement, as well as the Housing Assistance Plan. After final Commission action is taken, it is also recommended that the Final Statement be submitted to the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development. The Administration also requests permission to make necessary adjustments to the narrative and/or technical corrections which may be identified during the review process, and which do not significantly affect the approved budget or the intent of the • program. 11 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT YR 16 PROPOSAL CATEGORIZATION AND FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS DATE: 06/19/90 AMOUNT CURRENT RECOMMENDED PROJECT CATEGORY/NAME REQUESTED FUNDING FUNDING * ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY #24 SFAC ACQUISITION $344,552 $15,000 $22,500 TOTAL ACQUISITION.: $344,552 $15,000 $22,500 * PUBLIC FACILITIES& IMPROVEMENTS $0 SO SO * CLEARANCE ACTIVITIES SO $0 SO * PUBLIC SERVICES # I JVS-NUTRITIONAL PROJECT $21,164 $17,000 $15,000 #17 STANLEY C. MYERS HEALTH CENTER $30,000 $27,000 $25,000 # 8 MOUNT SINAI OUTREACH PROGRAM $20,000 $20,000 $18,000 # 9 DADE CO. SCHOOLS/CHILD CARE&FEE WAIVERS $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 # 4 ALEPH CHILD DEV. CENTER/CHILDREN AT RISK $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 # 7 BOYS CLUB JUVENILE PROGRAM $40,000 $23,000 $23,000 # 5 SOUTH BEACH SENIOR CENTER(CCJE) $41,090 $35,000 $30,000 #16 MIAMI BEACH ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $33,000 $25,000 $30,000 #19 MEDICATION/MEDICAL APPLIANCES $45,000 $36,000 $24,650 #13 ASPIRA LEADERSHIP DEV./DROPOUT PREVENT. PGM. $28,000 $20,000 $22,000 #18 LHAC-HOT MEALS PROGRAM $24,943 $20,000 $18,000 #15 CURE AIDS NOW $284,290 $26,000 $25,000 #14 BUREAU OF CHILDREN'S AFFAIRS $42,000 SO $0 #20 ST. JOHN'S CHILD CARE CENTER $22,363 $0 $10,000 TOTAL PUBLIC:SERVICES.- $661,P0 $274,000 $265,650 * REHABILITATION AND PRESERVATION Rehabilitation # 3 MULTI-UNIT REHABILITATION PROGRAM $550,000 $281,611 $301,578 #11 JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES-SECURITY DEVICES $20,264 $13,000 $10,000 Total Rehabilitation $570,264 $294,611 $311,578 Total Code Enforcement $0 $0 $0 Historic Preservation # 6 HISTORIC PROPERTIES PLAQUE INSTALLATION PGM. $10,000 $0 $0 Total Historic Preservation $10,000 $0 SO TOTAL REHABILITATION AND PRESERVATION $580,264 $294,611 $311,578 • • i.; 12 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT YR 16 PROPOSAL CATEGORIZATION AND FINAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS DATE: 06/1 AMOUNT CURRENT RECOMMEN DED PROJECT CATEGORY/NAME REQUESTED FUNDING FUNDING * SPECIAL ECON. DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES $0 $0 $0 * SPECIAL ACTIVITIES BY SUB-RECIPIENTS x'26 NO. SHORE COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION PGM. S 100,000 $60,250 $60,000 #10 LINCOLN ROAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM $150,000 $95,000 $0 X23 MBDC-HOME OWNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT $148,307 $137,201 $137,201 ,x'22 MBDC-COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION $326,873 $309,799 $259,799 121 MBDC-LINCOLN RD. - REVITALIZATION PGM. (1) $95,000 $0 $50,000 425 SOUTH FLORIDA ART CENTER/ECON. DEVELOPMENT $382,300 $285,000 $285,000 #12 LOG CABIN PLANT NURSERY $35,511 $28,500 $22,986 7`4�`AY':.$�ECYA�:.A��'I'�.�T'I�S..�...... ....... I�........................... .. ........................ .�Z......i... .......... ,. ,.. . .........►............... .........................................�........1............. * RELOCATION ..TOT,AL.�tELf�CA'�'IE��t........................................................................ ,.........:............:::..........�;. . .. .. .. ... ......:.�0:�>.......::.... .. .... ......... .. .::�..:....::: .>....8� . * ADMINISTRATIONIPLANNING/MGMT # 2 CDBG ADMINISTRATION $441,550 $416,950 $441,550 1 550: $416:'950:: ::<=< ::: <5441 550 ... . . . ... ...............,.....-............-.-............ ...........................-............-.. �... ............ .............................. . .......... . . * CONTINGENCIES $0 $0 $0 (1) NEW PROPOSAL&BUDGET REQUIRED :f#tM0:1:1t0.411 11111111 .111 .01 .11 OM .111111 :4t 111 .01 lipi**1 PUBLIC SERVICES CAP @ 15% = $265,650 SOURCE OF FUNDS ADMIN/PLANNING CAP @ 20% = $441,750 Entitlement $1,771,000 (BASED ON ENTITLEMENT ALLOCATION PLUS Reprog. Funds $109,264 PROJECTED PROGRAM INCOME,AS PER RFP'S) Program Income $14,000 13 YEAR 16 CDBG PLANNING PHASE SCHEDULE 1990 February 22 (Thursday) Adv's Appeared re: Public Hearings Notice and RFP Availability February 26 (Monday) RFP Packets available March 6 (Tuesday) Performance Hearing held 7 : 00 p.m. Needs Hearing held 8 : 00 p.m. March 27 (Tuesday) RFPs/Proposals due 12 : 00 p.m. March 28 - April 20 Staff Review and Analysis of Proposals April 24 - (Tuesday) CDAC Proposal Review 6: 00 p.m. May 1 (Tuesday) CDAC Proposal Review 6: 00 p.m. May 7 (Monday) CDAC Proposal Review 6: 00 p.m. May 8 (Tuesday) CDAC Proposal Review 6: 00 p.m. May 14 (Monday) CDAC Proposal Review 6: 00 p.m. May 15 (Tuesday) CDAC Proposal Review 6: 00 p.m. May 22 (Tuesday) CDAC meeting with 6: 00 p.m. the City Manager June 5 (Tuesday) Final CDAC meeting with 6: 00 p.m. with the City Manager June 20 (Wednesday) Commission Meeting to set Public Hearing July 1 (Sunday) Public Hearing Notice Appeared July 5 (Thursday) "Proposed Statement" Published July 11 (Wednesday) Public Hearing held on "Proposed Statement" July 25 (Wednesday) City Commission approved the "Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" August 20 (Monday) Submit "Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" to HUD 1 L 4 • ORIGINAL RESOLUTION NO. 90-20037 Approving an application for, and autho- rizing filing of, a final statement of objectives and projected use of funds for year sixteen under the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; the 1983 Urban-Rual Recovery Act; and the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987.