The URL can be used to link to this page

Agreement with Aecom Technical Services, Inc. , PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2017-300-KB ' This Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) is entered into this ti day of cel , 2018' between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation organized and a [sting under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139 (the City), and AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, whose address is 800 South Douglas Road, 2nd Floor, North Tower; Coral Gables, FL 33134 (Consultant). SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS Agreement: This Agreement between the City and Consultant, including any exhibits and amendments thereto. City Manager: The chief administrative officer of the City. , City Manager's Designee: The City staff member who is designated by the City Manager to administer this Agreement on behalf of the City. The City Manager's designee shall be Susanne M. Torriente, Assistant City Manager/Chief Resiliency Officer Consultant: For the purposes of this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to be an independent contractor, and not an agent or employee of the City. Services: All services; work and actions by the Consultant performed or undertaken pursuant to the Agreement. Fee: Amount-paid to the Consultant as compensation for Services. Proposal Documents: Proposal ;Documents shall mean City of Miami Beach Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2017-300-KB for Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Stormwater Resiliency Program, together with all amendments thereto, issued by the City in contemplation of this Agreement RFQ, and. the Consultant's proposal in response thereto (Proposal), all of which are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the following order of precedent shall prevail: this Agreement; the RFQ; and the Proposal. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 1 Risk Manager: The Risk Manager of the City, with offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Third Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139; telephone number (305) 673-7000, Ext. 6435; and fax number(305) 673-7023. SECTION 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 In consideration of the Fee to be paid to Consultant by the City, Consultant shall provide the work and services described in Exhibit"A" hereto (the Services). Although Consultant may be provided with a schedule of the available hours to provide its services, the City shall not control nor have the right to control the hours of the services performed by the Consultant; where the services are performed (although the City will provide Consultant with the appropriate location to perform the services); when 'the services are performed, including how many days a week the services are performed; how the services are performed, or any other aspect of the actual manner and means of accomplishing the services provided. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all services provided by the Consultant shall be performed' in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager. If there are any questions regarding the services to be performed, Consultant should contact the following person: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Susanne'M. Torriente, Assistant City Manager/Chief Resiliency Officer 2.2 . Consultant's Services, and any deliverables incident thereto, shall be completed in accordance with the timeline and/or schedule in the Consultant Service Order. 2.3 Consultant shall only commence any services, or portions thereof, upon issuance of a Consultant Service Order by the City. SECTION 3 TERM The term of this Agreement (Term) shall commence upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, and shall have an initial term of five (5) years, with two (2) renewal options for a period of two (2) years each, to be exercised at the City Manager's sole option and discretion, by providing Consultant with written notice of same no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the initial term. Notwithstanding the Term provided herein, Consultant shall adhere to any specific timelines, schedules, dates, and/or performance milestones for completion and delivery of the Services, as same is/are set forth in the timeline and/or schedule referenced in the Consultant Service Order. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 2 SECTION 4 FEE � n 4.1 In consideration of the Services to be provided, Consultant shall be compensated through individual Consultant Service Orders (Exhibit "B") issued for a particular project, on a "Lump Sum" or "Not to Exceed" fee for provision of the Services, or portions thereof, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a particular Project, shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant, and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. Notwithstanding the preceding, the total fee paid to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. 4.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual • expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project, provided such expenses are authorized in advance by the City in a Consultant Service Order. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified herein, belongs to, and shall be controlled by the City (i.e. unused portions will be retained by the City and shall not be paid to Consultant). Only approved travel- related expenses authorized by a Consultant Service Order will be reimbursed to the Consultant, in an amount not-to-exceed the agreed-upon amount reflected on the corresponding Consultant Service Order, and in accordance with City-wide Procedure OD. 20.01 (Travel on City Business), as may be updated by the City from time to time. Notwithstanding the above, any Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the corresponding Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material required to support the amount invoiced, and as requested by the corresponding Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Only actual amounts incurred and paid (requiring proof of payment) by the Consultant shall be invoiced, without any markups and/or additions. 4.3 INVOICING Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed, so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice). No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. In addition to the invoice, the Consultant shall, for Hourly Rate authorizations, submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. Invoices shall include a detailed description of the Services(or portions thereof) provided, and shall be submitted to the City at the following address: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Naima De Pinedo, Office Manager RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 3 4.4 ESCALATION The initial hourly rates shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement. Ninety (90) days prior to expiration of the Initial Term, the City may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Only request for increases based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; U.S. City average (1982- 84=100), as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"), or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City, including (but not limited to) living wage increases, will be considered. In the event that the City determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated, the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. SECTION 5 TERMINATION 5.1 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE If the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner, or otherwise violates, any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations material to this Agreement, the City, through its City Manager, shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement for cause. Prior to exercising its option to terminate for cause, the City shall notify the Consultant of its violation of the particular term(s) of this Agreement, and shall grant Consultant ten (10) days to cure such default. If such default remains uncured after ten (10) days, the City may terminate this Agreement without further notice to Consultant. Upon termination, the City shall be fully discharged from any and all liabilities, duties, and terms arising out of, or by virtue of, this Agreement. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by any breach of the Agreement by the Consultant. The City, at its sole option and discretion, shall be entitled to bring any and all legal/equitable actions that it deems to be in its best interest in order to enforce the City's right and remedies against Consultant. The City shall be entitled to recover all costs of such actions, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 5.2 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY THE CITY MAY ALSO, THROUGH ITS CITY MANAGER, AND FOR ITS CONVENIENCE AND WITHOUT CAUSE, TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT AT ANY TIME DURING THE TERM BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE TO CONSULTANT OF SUCH TERMINATION; WHICH SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING RECEIPT BY THE CONSULTANT OF. SUCH NOTICE. ADDITIONALLY, IN THE EVENT OF A PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR SAFETY CONCERN, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY MANAGER, IN THE CITY MANAGER'S SOLE DISCRETION, THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO A VERBAL OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CONTRACTOR, MAY IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT FOR A TIME CERTAIN, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT ON A GIVEN DATE. IF THE AGREEMENT IS TERMINATED FOR CONVENIENCE BY THE CITY, CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID FOR ANY SERVICES SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION; FOLLOWING WHICH THE CITY SHALL BE DISCHARGED RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 4 • FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, DUTIES, AND TERMS ARISING OUT OF, OR BY VIRTUE OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 5.3 TERMINATION FOR INSOLVENCY The City also reserves the right to terminate the Agreement in the event the Consultant is placed either in voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. In such event, the right and obligations for the parties shall be the same as provided for in Section 5.2. • SECTION 6 INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 6.1 INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Miami Beach and its officers, employees, agents, and.contractors, from and against any and all,actions (whether at law or in equity), claims, liabilities, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and. costs, for personal, economic or bodily injury, wrongful death, loss of or damage to property, which may arise or be alleged to have arisen from the negligent acts, errors, omissions or other wrongful conduct of the Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or any other person or entity acting under Consultant's control or supervision, in connection with, related to, or as a result of the Consultant's performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement. To that extent, the Consultant shall pay all such claims and losses and shall pay all such costs and judgments which may issue from any lawsuit arising from such claims and losses, and shall pay all costs and attorneys' fees expended by the City in the defense of such claims and losses, including appeals. The Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise-provided by the Consultant shall in no way limit the Consultant's responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The parties agree that one percent (1%) of the total compensation to Consultant for performance of the Services under this Agreement is the specific consideration from the City to the Consultant for the Consultant's indemnity agreement. The provisions of this Section 6.1 and of this indemnification shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. 6.2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS [NOTE: INSURANCE TYPES AND LIMITS BELOW SHOULD ALWAYS BE SAME AS WHAT WAS SPECIFICED IN BID DOCUMENTS] The Consultant shall maintain and carry in full force during the Term, the following insurance: 1. Consultant General Liability, in the amount of$1,000,000; 2. Consultant Professional Liability, in the amount of$200,000; and 3. Workers Compensation & Employers Liability, as required pursuant to Florida Statutes. The insurance must be furnished by insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida. All insurance,policies must be Issued by companies rated no less than "B+" as to management and not less than "Class VI" as to strength by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey, or its equivalent. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 5 All of Consultant's certificates shall contain endorsements providing that written notice shall be given to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction in coverage in the policy. The insurance certificates for General Liability shall include the City as an additional insured and shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement. Original certificates of insurance must be submitted to the City's Risk Manager for approval (prior to any work and/or services commencing) and will be kept on file in the Office of the Risk Manager. The City shall have the right to obtain from the Consultant specimen copies of the insurance policies inthe event that submitted certificates of insurance are inadequate to ascertain compliance with required coverage. The Consultant is also solely responsible for obtaining and submitting all insurance certificates for any sub-consultants. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the Consultant of the liabilities and obligations under this Section or under any other portion of this Agreement. The Consultant shall not commence any work and or services pursuant to this Agreement until all insurance required under this Section has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by the City's Risk Manager. SECTION 7 LITIGATION JURISDICTIONNENUE/JURY TRIAL WAIVER This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. This Agreement shall be enforceable in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and if legal action is necessary byeither party with respect to the enforcement of any or all of the terms or conditions herein, exclusive venue for the enforcement of same shall lie in Miami-Dade County, Florida. By entering into this Agreement, Consultant and the City expressly waive any rights either party may have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement. SECTION 8 LIMITATION OF CITY'S LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on the City's liability for any cause of action, for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the sum of $10,000. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damage action for breach of contract to be limited to a maximum amount of$10,000. Accordingly, and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to the Consultant for damages in an amount in excess of $10,000 for any action or claim for breach of contract arising out of the performance or non-performance of any obligations imposed upon the City by this Agreement. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 6 Nothing contained in this section or elsewhere in this Agreement is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon the City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. SECTION 9 DUTY OF CARE/COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS/PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; AND CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS 9.1 DUTY OF CARE With respect to the'performance of the work and/or service contemplated herein, Consultant shall exercise that degree of skill, care, efficiency and diligence normally exercised by reasonable persons and/or recognized professionals with respect to the performance of comparable work and/or services. 9.2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS In its performance of the work and/or services, Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, - ordinances, and regulations of the City, Miami-Dade County, the State of) Florida, and the federal government,as applicable. 9.3 PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS Any work product arising out of this Agreement, as well as all information specifications, processes, data and findings, are intended to be the property of the City and shall not otherwise be made public and/or disseminated by Consultant, without the prior written consent of the City Manager, excepting any information, records etc. which are required to be disclosed pursuant to Court Order and/or Florida Public Records Law. All reports, documents, articles, devices, and/or work produced in whole or in part under this Agreement are intended to be the sole and exclusive property of the City, and shall not be subject to any application for copyright or patent by or on behalf of the Consultant or its employees or sub-consultants, without the prior written consent of the City Manager. SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 AUDIT AND INSPECTIONS Upon reasonable verbal or written notice to Consultant, and at any time during normal business hours (i.e. 9AM — 5PM, Monday through Fridays, excluding nationally recognized holidays), and as often as the City Manager may, in his/her reasonable discretion and judgment, deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City Manager, and/or such representatives as the City Manager may deem to act on the City's behalf, to audit, examine, and/ or inspect, any and all other documents and/or records relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all such records at its place of business at the address set forth in the "Notices" section of this Agreement. 10.2 [INTENTIONALLY DELETETD] RFQ-2017-300-KB S Page 7 10.3 ASSIGNMENT, TRANSFER OR SUBCONSULTING C Consultant shall not subcontract, assign; or transfer all or any portion of any work and/or service under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Manager, which consent, if given at all, shall be in the Manager's sole judgment and discretion. Neither this Agreement, nor any term or provision hereof, or right hereunder, shall be assignable unless as approved pursuant to this Section, and any attempt to make such assignment (unless approved) shall be void. 10.4 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES Prior to commencement of the Services, the Consultant shall file a State of Florida Form PUR 7068, Sworn Statement under.Section 287.133(3)(a) Florida Statute on.Public Entity Crimes . with the City's Procurement Division. 10.5 NO DISCRIMINATION In connection with the performance of the Services, the Consultant shall not exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status. Additionally, Consultant shall comply fully with the City of Miami Beach Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, as may be amended from time to time, prohibiting discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and public services on account of actual or perceived race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, age, disability, ancestry, height, weight, domestic partner status, labor organization membership, familial situation, or political affiliation. 10.6 CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant herein agrees to adhere to and be governed by all applicable Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest Ordinances and Ethics provisions, as set forth in the Miami-Dade County Code, as may be amended from time to time; and by the City of Miami Beach Charter and Code, as may be amended from time to time; both of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Consultant covenants that it, presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which could conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall' not employ any person having any such interest. No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this Agreement or to any benefits arising therefrom. 10.7 CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW (A) Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time. (B) The term "public records" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011(12), which RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 8 means all(documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission,, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. (C) Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes, if the Consultant meets the definition of"Contractor" as defined in Section 119.0701(1.)(a), the Consultant shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (2), Upon request from the City's custodian of public records, provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed, except as,authorized by law, for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (4) Upon completion of the Agreement, transfer, at no cost to the City, all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service. If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the City, upon request from the, City's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. (D) REQUEST FOR RECORDS; NONCOMPLIANCE. Th (1) A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City. If the City does not possess the requested records, the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request, and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time. (2) Consultant's failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement, and the City, at its sole discretion, may: (1) unilaterally terminate.the Agreement; (2) avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement; and/or(3) avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. (3) A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s. 119.10. (E) CIVIL ACTION. (1) If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records relating to the City's contract for services, the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorney fees, if: a. The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time; and b. At least 8 business days before filing the action, the plaintiff provided written notice of the public records request, including a statement that the RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 9 7 Consultant has not complied with the request, to the City and to the Consultant. (2) A notice complies with subparagraph (1)(b) if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent. Such notices must be sent by common carrier delivery service or by registered, Global Express Guaranteed, or certified mail, with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery, which may be in an electronic format. (3) A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. (F) IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT:. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION: RAFAEL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 E-MAIL: RAFAELGRANADO(a�MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE: 305-673-7411 SECTION 11 • NOTICES All notices and communications in writing required or permitted hereunder, shall be delivered personally to the representatives of the Consultant and the City listed below or may be mailed by U.S. Certified Mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service. Until changed by notice, in writing, all such notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: TO CONSULTANT: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 800 South Douglas Road, 2"d Floor, North Tower Coral Gables, FL 33134 Attn: Agustin J. Barrera Email: qus.barrera(a�aecom.com TO CITY: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: . Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 10 With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Susanne M. Torriente, Assistant City Manager/Chief Resiliency Officer Notice may.also be provided to any other address designated by the party to receive notice if such alternate address is provided via U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivered, or by overnight delivery. In the event an alternate notice address is properly provided, notice shall be sent to such alternate address in addition to any other address which notice would otherwise be sent, unless other delivery instruction as specifically provided for by the party entitled to notice. Notice shall be deemed given on the date of an acknowledged receipt, or, in all other cases, on the date of receipt or refusal. .. SECTION 12 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 12.1 CHANGES AND ADDITIONS This Agreement cannot be modified or amended without the express written consent of the parties. No modification, amendment, or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 12.2 SEVERABILITY If any term or provision of this.Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced,to the fullest extent permitted by law. 12.3 ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT The City and Consultant agree that this is the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that 'are not contained in this document. Title and paragraph headings are for convenient reference and are not intended to confer any rights'or obligations upon the parties to this Agreement. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first entered above. FOR CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA ATTEST: By: 4 /142:°Z.-- --------- City Cler � �i � ,411 �+,,/1�� Mayor --�� Date: l ti. q ' ,...,;`.:P-- , r to li-ORP ORATED FOR CONSULTANT: ' `(1 2 C-; AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC. ATTEST: By: li„ i ' cYloWZa. off, s��CY�'� RA-Ahoy kierak /41 �n1zeto Print Name and Title Print Name and Title 5rd4''}•'ley Date: ‘t.5.1061 ryr APPROVED AS TO -- FORM &LANGUAGE - ,-; &FOR EXECUTION IL--'1 :"..,57 Z.,'... 17:-. 4(3 .j_pit4,.(. ., 5_2,t- si — City Attorney Data • RFQ-20.17-300-KB Page 12 EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. The Consultant will provide subject matter expertise to the City of Miami Beach for business case study(s) requested in RFQ No. 2017-300-KB, economic analysis of the value of our risk reduction investments to address flooding and sea level rise, as, as detailed in the Consultant's proposal. This analysis should explain the risk cost of inaction (in dollar terms) and the extent to which the risk cost is likely to be reduced as a result of the city's infrastructure investments (also in dollar terms). Analysis will also consider the complex relationships between the anticipated reduction in risk cost and: • our private property tax base; • flood insurance (both future FEMA models / FIRM maps 'and private market rates); • the availability and affordability of private property mortgages over mortgage cycles; • the city's municipal credit rating and insurance premiums;. • land use issues; • any other factor that may be pertinent. The Work would not just explain these interdependent relationships and so help decision-makers. It will be an evidence-based tool to communicate the city's risk reduction investment. It will also be a tool for decision-makers which illustrates in economic terms the best case and worst case scenarios. C3. Resulting Consultant Service Orders pursuant to this agreement, the City may be awarded in the following manner: C3.1. Pilot: The Pilot phase would be an analysis of a completed project or a sample neighborhood project. This would be a smaller engagement in scope with quicker results focusing on two risks: the five-year storm in combination with 2060 southeast Florida sea level rise scenarios. This would examine the risks in two-ways: without any infrastructure improvements and with the current stormwater intervention. The Pilot would analyze how the inaction and action may affect the City's property tax base, flood insurance, real estate market and financial mortgage cycles, and credit ratings. C3.2. Ongoing: This may include the analysis of additional risks and additional adaptation investments at a project or program level, that may be an expansion or continuation of the project in other areas of the City or may be a new scope altogether. The proposing teams are encouraged to present innovative decision- making tool(s). The tool(s) should be designed to facilitate a review of RFQ-2017-300 KB Page 13 engineering and science-based solutions. It should compare the solutions with the current costs. It should also compare the cost over time and the triple bottom line value (economic, environmental, social) to the City of Miami Beachin the short term (5 year), mid-term (10 to 20 year) and long term (30 +.. years). Approach 2 would provide the ability for the City to analyze how the inaction and action may affect the City's property tax base, flood insurance, real estate market and financial mortgage cycles, and credit ratings, land use issues, or any other factor that may be pertinent to the Work. • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 14 EXHIBIT B CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. for Consulting Services. • TO: AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. PROJECT NAME: Project Name DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Stormwater Resiliency Program (RFQ No. 2017-300-KB) you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: • Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Days Original Service Order Amount: $ Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: $ Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ City's Project Date Coordinator/Manager Assistant Director Date Consultant. Date Project Administrator-Director Date RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 15 • EXHIBIT C HOURLY BILLING RATE SCHEDULE RFQ 2017-300-KB Business Case Analysis Personnel Title Hourly Rates Accountant $99.00 Adm inistration/Clerical $85.00 Administrative Assistant $103.00, Administrator $116.00 Associate $135.00 Associate Engineer $140.00 Associate Landscape Architect $125.00 Associate Director $126.00 Attorney $172.00 CADD Operator $109.00 CADD/Engineering Technician $103.00 Coastal.Scientist $169.00 Construction Specialist $136.00 Consultant $85.00 Data Analyst $83.00 Deputy Project Manager $96.00 Designer $117.00 CADD Designer $149.00 CADD Manager/Supervisor $159.00 Director $230.00' Eco nom ist $147.00 Engineer $128.00 Engineer/Assistant Engineer $126.00 Engineering Technician $85.00 Field Inspector • $98.00. GIS Analyst $92.00, GIS Specialist $134.00. Hydrologist. $166.00 Insurance Expert $255.00 Intern $47.00. Junior Consultant ; $83.00 Managing Director,Economics $302.00 Managing Director $228.00 Policy Analyst $190.00 Principal $258.00 Principal Consultant $202.00 Principal Designer $174.00 Principal Engineer $195.00 Principal in Charge - $247.00 Principal Economist. $234.00 Principal Engineer/Scientist/Project Mana- ger,PE or PG $225.00 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 16 Professional Support Ill $156.00 Project Engineer $158.00 Project Landscape Architect $152.00 Project Manager $180.00 Project Scientist $176.00 Project Engineer/Scientist $162.00 Research Analyst $100.00 Research Economist $138.00 Reseracher $97.00 Scientist/Assistant Scientist $103.00 Senior Accountant $205.00 Senior Attorney $240.00 Senior Construction Specialist $149.00 Senior Consultant $204.00 Senior Director,Economics $280.00 Senior Economist $182.00 Senior Engineer $178.00 Senior Field Coordinator $140.00 Senior Landscape Architect $199.00 Senior Principal Designer $186.00 Senior Principal Engineer $203.00 Senior Principal Scientist $204.00 Senior Project Manager $219.00 Senior Technician $184.00 Senior Associate $167.00. Senior Engineer/Scientist,PE or PG $216.00 Senior Engineering Technician $139.00 Senior Principal,PE or PG $189.00 Senior Hydrologist $217.00 __ • Staff Engineer/Scientist/Project Coordinator $134.00 Technician $99.00 Transportation Director $267.00 Vice President $170.00 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 17 EXHIBIT D APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS 1. RMS RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 18 EXHIBIT E RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM RESOLUTION NO. kutit,laos A RESQLOTION OrTHE NIAYOR AND-CITY'COMMISSION OF THE OITY - FLoRtpA, nqaFrom THE REct2---tambAnta OF THE WI MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS !WM RFO N.117-3(11a-Ka FOR A iSLISINESE CASE ANALYSIS Cr TIM CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORM-WATER RESILIENCY PRA M; AUTHOMINO TE AmoNisTRATioN T WhITER iircraGattATIONS WITH 1OF INCORPORATED, LLC, AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOETER, TO AS THE cars Fforli_Etwo .CONSLILTANT; FURfEraZ, ESIAMILISHING A tbotit. - REA:MIRED CONSULTANTS FOR SPEcIFic TASTO; • RELATING TO ThE •ores. 8TCRSAWATSE/ REOLIONCY PROGRAM aginIESS CASE ANALYSISPROJEL7'•,JS, ON AN A.S.NOSO AASIE, AND wiTH RESPECT TO THE PRE.QUALIPIED CONSULTANT PL AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENT INTO NEOOTIA:!-TICI414 WiTh MEG FosTER.WHEELER EINIACiNNIENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., AS THE SECO-fa' RANIIED PROPOSER; ACO TECHNICAL 51ERvicES, JNC AS 0.-10 THIRD RANHIO PROPMER; THE BALMORAL GROUP,AS THE FOURTH'RANKED PROPOSER; H4ZEN AD vottfeit TI.T7 KFTH ,t4,000 PA-MOSER;CI= HILL EMI- •a INC4 AS THE SIKTH RANXED- PROPOSER; MD ARLIP LISA, [JC„ AS THE EV/ NTH RANKED. PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORMIG THE MAYOR.AND CITY CLERK 1i EXECUTE AOREEMENTsWThI EACH OP TIM POOGOING PROPOSERS UPON! CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BYTHE ADIMSTRATION, WHEREAS! anSeater-05e 13„ TID1T, Ms City ban-cr ,r,lon approved the bum* ni Raticlow,1r 0,ealf‘taatna (FIT-1-g Ha. 201741CO,KE)For&these Om,Analpis OT 1116.cal QT Mi alth Sttral,fater Reslierisy FT9grOffN Ffrgi wHEREAs,. RN-Litg Rkr gr.ial,h=70.4 No, 2C.INICI14;2 the imat W.eated: cfti WAD nta E,aiii7;aL-7-rd IN.-HEREAS, a valuably piti,-prapLaSaltrin was hell an el:Totter 10,2(117;,end WHEREAS, an NaTIttaihei 1::t 2017,the City Detehied a Mel ca 12 propcablarKi WHEREAS, oil Detert 19 ;hid 20, 2017, RI E4aatiatir4,311M11100 (TO4ig.-±6114,P, 00'111'6' L 11,4 ti Wager;NIA War WI Cerrml'arderd ILt tz 29.2017, ctined 1.0 responshca rtktehkEd;Sod WHEREAS, tit :-Ceatttilitet effiew Me IrINi11431 tQ-the CiVe Corp3 Slade Cain-ante Arid tha Goiarmiwn SzertskineL&zrngtnettilifireit , G.ti Mgrpo: fserikgs, and a EPpy death preperatd: ate WAEREAS, ledtiffffbm'S fOnkft rtwaa&biCiffiE 114F IndotKratoo, 14,C-, a TTt3 trp ranked prowar, aro with oper4 to tho pogie ralp flied tot nitwit he!metaled ta eta an at:r&adacl kotis, reratmlii Am-et RA-WM*0u Efeiratment d 11111Williare, no. T-ra &El ttrti:rig-143d gicpoon AEOQM Tkwhrlpal Urv[pas, Inc., az the d rzrir Thr Urntral Group, m fElLtal reed attoeer, !Hazen er31. Seviwr,„ V* nth ratitatl ittapetec aim HILL EnonwsIr a V1.0 sprit ranked propeoer, Arial USA, Cre,., aztl.the nvortth, ral-kad A•titoset .R aftelie Firtattial OentiiI2Left MCA, eatith rw c4 4c, RFQ-2017-30,0-KB Page 19 HIS the, ill sifRad ; gegaga, Ire. n the innth tan W an Kiri;G ak.xt , :,renes kap :and i - t4rrq: 1Mk`&1434.kas Inr tul .ftr _,,_ .. _nr 4 ._ • H� Itnrcelleuing d quaffs : r fITirn, OM 'hat,ififj considemxt Fro Exaltation Ceniititet_tampenls : b. ra nk-k_ta, aly.I ':. •has ri=g1111rcr> that Mayer arra tl- nrnrr 1 Iran ni " the .n t lilt r :A i r e 1 ICF • In. tern=, LtC, a ttkgi reized arms wormer t 1.Ipnen Errnsu r I raapamb .ail rd 'e tnnil kt spaeffed leAs en an e ee e ' Alba* ne i s Air Ryiter Mager1r 1 Z tr r , b., as to se-417,m rind ,p -r; i "r ai: " ' Ing, athei 5ird tankad Win_ ': er The 1 r . : f th tan, r r• Her er -, as the ran ... I{ILS= -&titt:Int,„ at the aitth rankeJorwsec andArrigt. USA, Inc-, etventh tanked a H aTiTiSS37ORS, OS IT 10.1)1._„Y ( OLfi [ ESI' THE :MAYOR AND CII? COMMISSION Of .H DIY OF ItitAIM BEADK, FLORIDX 1 lilts ,Me r en4 alit CCrrirrr an hereby t tta i=rtnYwo:_tattcri ettp, " :.fir, :par lain tc Reliaet ftr Okat,:, rgna (RPt NO. r17®3 fat Busittast -a 'e Mlle C&ya _. I ErA Sttymiyaom Ragtem f't' <.INgillhOM#10 krithrWatkin t r inti rr a tacrS11. I0F hen,rd, LL n,the iatp tbditall Oftptibe, sem as the Cars Primaitaad -thee , arttamo a a=• et _e11%_ _ c' :.- a-._�.rni i h' r ity s _ } °nT _., e (_ _ r, m u head rr :7 en ,. , n an seeneeeledlesis, ,pry t ri r' ; t mtn• the mihhtrt-; erter enterEnba Gana Vah Porbar #rr Etnilanment aril Thi : e Itn ; figs samid pr ri Aga:0 Tediftst Inc„ the Lard r rel= .prepreer the &nip, as I Wei rankest a Hann anti 1 I"rfi n. r L rtal '_ Eng,: , :, ® Ing 1 ret prisgswer, er :US�g, tr ,, Ih saYezth Fr - Miler al:Tided the:fitynt Mtarea aly CI=e at_mte rare-wefts vi_Mes-..-Octfrm tregnklg up ` e r igtwbbbbbfiA ra t a $by bila P AND ADOPTED i! of e 1• = ATT = itrtajri PATET4 ?." t :701/ a 'r,- F7..".- sus?$ - PttrmwcurE2frizirrtil 'S$ `.... etS4 AVAVA ..s.rtua :TT • . • ,7-p7 !!lift wilt Qt3t3 • RFQ-2017-300-KB , • Page 20 Coversheet Page 1 of 5• • Resolutions-R7 J MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales;City Manager DATE:. February 14,2018 • • SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. RFQ 2017-300-KB FOR A BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING.THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH ICF INCORPORATED,LLC,AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER,TO SERVE AS THE CITY'S PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT; FURTHER, ESTABLISHING A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO THE CITY'S STORMWATER RESIUENCY PROGRAM BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS PROJECTS,OMAN AS-NEEDED BASIS,AND WITH RESPECT TO THE PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANT POOL,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.,AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.,AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER;THE BALMORAL GROUP,AS THE FOURTH RANKED PROPOSER;HAZEN AND SAWYER,AS THE FIFTH RANKED PROPOSER;CH2M HILL ENGINEERS,INC.,AS THE SIXTH RANKED PROPOSER;AND ARUP USA, INC., AS THE SEVENTH RANKED PROPOSER;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution: ,ANALYSIS • At the.January 2017 Sustainability and Resiliency Committee(SRC),during'the Resilience Strategy Work Plan monthly update, Commissioner Amiola and four additional Commissioners present discussed the need for and requested a data-based business case study of our stormwater resilience program.Further discussions at SRC included analyzing three locations that have different characteristics.Staff consulted with 100 Resilient Cities due to expertise and global offerings available to the City'as part of this network. The organization was quite intrigued with our complex request,the first of its kind. Although 100 Resilient Cities did not have this type of offering within its portfolio, the organization is closely monitoring how this analysis can support adaptation investments in coastal cities globally.. It was concluded that a competitive process would be best to assess the market,different scenarios and seek the best product for the City of Miami Beach. In addition,the business case.results,as well as the pool of qualified firms can be utilized by our 100 Resilient Cities Greater Miami and the Beaches partners:the City of Miami and Miami- Dade County:and South Florida. The City solicited proposals tom qualified firms that can provide the City with business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades, other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies(the'Work').Through this RFQ,the City intends to select one or more firms that can provide the City with resiliency related business case analysis(es)as required.The business case study(ies) requested include economic analysis(es)of the value of our risk reduction investments to address flooding and sea level rise. This analysis should explain the risk cost of inaction(in ddlar terms)and the extent to which the risk cost is likely to be reduced as a result of the city's infrastructure investments(also in dollar terms). The.Work may consider the complex relationship and impact(s)among City investments(that reduce risk to flooding and sea level rise)to the City's property tax base,•flood insurance,real estate market and financial mortgage cycles,,and City credit ratings,land use issues,or any other factor that:may be pertinent to the Work To meet the City's needs for business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,'otherresiliency measures,or adaptation strategies,by means of this.RFQ the City seeks to contract for the following: 1. Prime Consultant(s).The City may make an award to qualified consultant(s)that can act in the capacity of the City's prime consultant for business case analysis(es) of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades; other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies.The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process to develop business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies.While the.City intends to make an award to a single consultant,it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest Additionally, the City reserves the right to engage other consultants,either-through option 2 below or through other means,to assist the City in its development of business case analysis(es) of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency Measures,or adaptation strategies. 1. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants:Additionally,to assist with smaller engagements relating to business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies(Or related needs), the City intends to create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants(not selected in Option 1 above).Firms that submit a • https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet aspx?ItemID=6275&Meet.:: 2/21/2018' • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 21 Coversheet Page 2 of 5 • proposal pursuant to the RFQ,and who are deemed to(be responsive,responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants.The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the.City Manager. The City requested proposals from qualified firms to provide business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies. REQ PROCESS On September 13,2017,the.City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications(RFQ)No..2017-300.-KB for Business Case Analysis of The City of Miami Beach Stormwater Resiliency Program-. On September 29, 2017, the RFQ was issued.The Procurement Department issued solicitation notices to 1644 firms utilizing www.publicpurchase.com. 111 prospective proposers accessed the advertised solicitation. A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information,to the proposers submitting a response was held'on October 10,2017.RFQ responses were due and received on November 13,2017.The City received a total of 12 proposals.The City received proposals from the following firms: •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. -Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure,Inc. -.Arup USA,Inc. • Brizaga,Inc. • CH2M HILL Engineers,Inc. • Hazen and Sawyer • ICF Incorporated,L.L.C. ▪ ISH Markit ▪ Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. -Raftelis Financial Consultants.Inc. • Risk Management Solutions,Inc. The Balmoral Group On October 31,2017 the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via LTC#529-2017.The Evaluation Committee convened on December 19 and 20,2017 to consider proposals received.The committee was comprised of Sonia Bridges,Division Director. Risk Management Division,City of Miami Beach; Roy Coley,Assistant Director,Public Works Administration,City of Miami Beach;Amy Knowles.Deputy Resiliency Officer,City Manager's Office,City of Miami Beach;Chris Rose,Chief Financial Officer, City of Miami;John Woodruff,Chief Financial Officer, Finance Department,City of Miami Beach.The Committee was provided an overview of the project information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Govemment.Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services, a copy of each proposal, and a presentation by each proposing firm. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established'in the RFQ.The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A,in the following order: 1. ICF Incorporated LLC 2-Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure,Inc. 3.-AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 4. The Balmoral Group 5. Hazen and Sawyer 6. CH2M HILL Engineers,Inc. 7. Arup USA,Inc. 8, Raftelis Financial Consultants,Inc 9.' IHS Markit 10. Brizaga,Inc. 11. Risk Management Solutions,Inc, 12. Kimley-Horn and Associates;Inc. A summary of each tbp-ranked firm,based on the information provided in each firm's proposal,'follows: ICF Incorporated LLC ICF has assembled a multidisciplinary team to provide the City of Miami Beach with an innovative approach to business case analyses of the Citys stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,and adaptation strategies.This will help Miami Beach make cost-effective investments to ensure it can continue to thrive and be a world-class home for residents, • businesses,and visitors despite the risks from sea level rise. Their team brings local,regional,and national expertise in"economic analysis, cost-benefit analysis, risk modeling, risk management, insurance, and climate adaptation, as well as in-depth understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerability to sea level rise,local characteristics,and'past resiliency efforts.ICF regularly works • with both public and private sector clients to manage.climate risks and inform decision making regarding assets,services;planning, and investments.Their multidisciplinary team is able to deliver practical solutioha to decision makers using a holistic view of environmental,social,and environmental considerations.To support this type of work,they have cultivated a distinguished,in- house team of scientists, economists, engineers, sector specialists, and risk management experts. They offer a pragmatic approach to business base analysis that considers complex relationships and supports.real-world decision making. Their work in this space has been recognized for 6 years straight by the Environmental Business Journal and the.Climate Change Business Journal. In 2016, ICF received an'award in the area of"Advancing Best Practices: Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency"for their work,to support climate risk assessment and management for the energy sector through work for the U.S. • https://miatnibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapub lic/C overSheet.aspx?IteniID=6275&Meet... 2/21/2018 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 22 • Coversheet Page 3 of 5 I , Department of Energy and four major utilities.They will bring this experience and proven track-record of innovation to help Miami Beach make complex investment decisions to increase their resiliency. Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure,Inc. Their firm is.a multidisciplinary,global engineering firm with 11 offices throughout Florida,including their Miami Lakes office located about 20 miles from the City of Miami Beach.Their South Florida offices have been servingthe region for more than five decades. They understand the scope of work under this contract includes consulting services in the areas of sustainability.resiliency; adaptation strategies,and'risk management/mitigation. Amec Foster Wheeler is a worldwide provider of sustainability and resilience services with established offices and dedicated professionals in South Florida;the state,and the Southeast region. Their firm„in partnership with Impact•Infrastructure,.Inc., i recently completed a"Resilience Return on Investment'framework for the global Arup/Lloyds Register Foundation Resilience Shift Program,which will be directly applied to this project.They have also provided resiliency and sustainability services to the City of Miami Beach through their work with the Miami Beach"Rising Above Resilience"Strategy Workshop which provided them with a working knowledge of the City's resilience strategy and key stakeholders.In the aftermath of Hurricane Irma,Amec.Foster Wheeler is assisting Monroe.County by providing damage assessment services to assist with FEMA Public Assistance and Recovery operations. They are also providing resilience rebuilding and adaptation support in the U.S. Virgin Islands and flood vulnerability/adaptation support for the City of Paris.As an international leader in climate change vulnerability assessment and adaptation/resiliency planning,they understand the value.in being proactive and anticipating future needs.Amec Foster Wheeler has been providing specialized climate change:services for more than 20 years around the world for government and international agencies.Their Sustainability and Climate-Change Resiliency Practice Area,a subset of the Environment&Infrastructure division, provides'dients with direct access to a range of world-class experts. AECOM Technical Services,Inc. AECOM understands the City desires to continue advancing implementation of its Stormwater Resiliency Program and is'seeking consulting services to conduct business case analyses of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures, or adaptation strategies:AECOM offers cities the depth of resources and insight,with the breadth of expertise, to partner and assist them in furthering their goals.They draw on their diverse skills and services across the company to help make cities better places in which to live,do business and coexist with nature.They have worked with numerous cities across the country and globally in assessing climate change vulnerability,developing practical solutions,and putting those solutions into action. With a seamless integration of many disciplines, AECOM helps dients.build understanding of how to approach, understand, and maximize the returns to their investments in resilient strategies. They.work with governments, private corporations and public sector clients on infrastructure and resilience,and thus understand the challenges from many perspectives. For several years,AECOM has supported Miami Beach's Resiliency Program by helping the City evaluate and develop measures to combat.the.effects of sea level rise The.key objective has.been to create a more resilient community.Their support has helped the City create and execute an encompassing roadmap for analysis and action.This work'has included review of the City's land development and building codes and recommended actions to improve resilience:assisting in the adoption of revised ordinances: strengthening the City's programs as part of the FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) to reduce insurance costs: and assessment of the vulnerabilities:and strengths of the City's assets to sea level rise.A key outcome has been the Guidance Document on Sea Level Rise Vulnerability, which includes the Adaptation Decision-Making Assessment and Planning Tool (ADAPT).This tool provides the City with consolidated information and processes to use for building resilience strategies into City operations and-capital investment decisions: The Balmoral Group When The Balmoral Group was-established in 2004,their goal was to assist Florida to develop smarter by combining engineering and economics to provide sound policy and guidance by working on projects such as_this one. As one of Florida's leading , economics firms,The Balmoral Group was selected in 2011 to develop a prototype coastal resiliency cost-benefit analysis to be used•throughout the state.The firm then used this knowledge,along,with their state-leading hedonic modelling skills to be.setected to performsimilar services for the State of New South Wales in Australia. The Balmoral Group has exceptional experience in economic analysis,cost-benefit analysis, risk modeling, risk management ' advisory services,and'finance—including lending and insurance underwriting in the context of real estate.They are familiar with the City's unique situation with regard to its development patterns and elevation/topography/water storage challenges.They are . also keenly aware of the City's formidable efforts to manage the.risks the:City faces from sea level rise through selected elevation of infrastructure, installing of major pumps and retrofitting stormwater systems to accommodate rising sea levels and prevent backflow..Due to their strong background in the coastal space,they work closely with subject matter experts in coastal engineering -and hydrogeology,civil engineering,construction and real'estate development,and policy development.They"know what they don't know",and tap experts that are respected by their staff and their clients to ensure their'assumptions and logic are sound and defensible.For this reason,their business cases withstand scrutiny and the test of time. • Hazen and Sawyer • The Hazen team has extensive experience in the development of innovative tools to support decision-making across the • • :government,private,and public sectors;Team member RAND is a Strategy partner with100Resilient Cities and pioneered Robust Decision-Making(RDM)tools and frameworks for systematically evaluating and mitigating coastal vulnerabilities to future.threats and hazards.They Have successfully applied RDM methodologies to a wide range of coastal communities including Southeast Florida, New Orleans; New York City,and San Francisco.As a part of the100Resilient Cities initiative in.South Florida, RAND researchers used RDM methods to help prepare for climate change risks in Miami Dade and Broward Counties.The project utilized two USGS groundwater'models to develop an integrated modeling framework for understanding and adapting water management practices under uncertain,long-term climatic and land use futures.: http s://miatnibeachnovusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet,asp x?ItemID=6275&Meet... 2/21/2018 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 23 Coversheet Page 4 of 5 The Hazen team has been working on similar projects in the region and is familiar with the unique challenges of South Florida. Whether considering the highly transmissive subsurface of their ground or the extremely flat topography,their team has recently worked on projects similar to those in Miami Beach,including studies for the Cities of Coral Gables,Hialeah,and Fort Lauderdale. These studies demonstrate their vast understanding Of the potential climate change impacts to Southeast Florida and have resulted in their development of a database of mitigation efforts to adapt-to the evolving environment Their adaptation strategies concentrate on maintaining the high level of flood protection to their communities at a sustainable investment rate. Hazen continues to be a leader in efforts,both locally in South Florida and in vulnerable locations elsewhere in the United States,to understand and.anticipate the risks to infrastructure posed by sea level rise and dimate change and to recommend sustainable, cost-effective incremental adaptation strategies to help mitigate the risk They will work with the City to provide business case analysis to provide a more resilient future for the City. CH2M HILL Engineers,Inc. CH2M fully supports and embraces the City's goal of developing cost'effective,resilient,and robust infrastructure systems in an environmentally responsible manner that also provides value to the community through risk reduction,as embodied in the Miami Beach Rising Above campaign.Their world Gass experience–both in South Florida and around the globe—provides the industry leadership and local knowledge that are essential for the development and maintenance of flood protection/stormwater infrastructure that will serve the City reliably and cost-effectively•for many years to come through being adaptable to future sea .level rise scenarios. Demonstrating the world-class expertise CH2M brings to the City,they have a long,consistent history'of leading the industry-in the provision of stormwater,water,and wastewater-related services. Their expertise in these areas include economic analysis,cost benefit analysis, risk based asset management insurance, and strategic financing for all aspects of infrastructure investment projects as part of their comprehensive planning,design,construction and'operations and maintenance practice: CH2M leads the professional services industry delivering sustainable solutions benefiting societal,environmental and economic outcomes through the planning;design and development of infrastructure utilizing innovative techniques and tools.They provide consulting, design,engineering and management'services for clients in water,environment nuclear, transportation:energy and industrial markets.They are ranked among the World's Most Ethical Companies and top firms in environmental consulting and program management,CH2M in 2016 became the first professional services firm honored with the World Environment Center Gold • Medal Award forefforts advancing sustainable development Arup USA,Inc. Amp has a reputation for delivering innovative projects with creativity and passion.The firm's inventive spark and intellectual independence has been there from the very beginning,when Arup first came to the world's attention with the structural design of the Sydney Opera House.Drawing from the beliefs and convictions,they take immense pride in producing practical solutions to complex challenges.This is supported through considerable internal research investment,directed by their'own Amp University and Foresight.&Innovation groups.They are at the heart of many of the world's most prominent projects in the built environment and have an open culture,which encourages dissemination of information across their firm.From 92 offices in 40 counties,Amp's 13,000 engineers,planners,designers,and consultants deliver innovative projects across the world with creativity and passion. Amp has also been a global leader in resilience for many years, including their long-term partnership with the,Rockefeller Foundation to develop the City Resilience.Framework and City Resilience Index that form the basis for the 100RC program.They also developed the Climate Risk and Adaptation Framework and Taxonomy(CRAFT)for C40,which forms the basis for city resilience reporting for the Compact of Mayors.Amp's leadership in these global efforts will help guide their work.on this scope, and ensure that this work is consistent and supportive of the City of Miami Beach's role as a national leader in preparing for-climate change. They have deep project expertise in terms of both scale and geographies,as well as sectors and infrastructure,types.Their client portfolio includes Government Bodies/Promoters, Concession Bidders/Concessionaires, Bank Lenders, Credit-Rating Agencies and Financial Institutions,Operators and Regulators.They understand the perspective and requirements of promoters,bidders and lenders. They have combined their climate and engineering.expertise to develop climate resilience solutions on a number of scales,representatives of which are detailed in the projects section and staff resumes. CONCLUSION' The City received a robust response to the RFQ,with 12 firms responding..As previously noted,the intent of the RFQ was to.award a prime consultant that could be the.City's lead in the analyses,as well as award a pool of qualified consultant to be used on an as needed basis for other engagements relating to the scope Of the work as described in the.RFQ.The Consultants will serve as an extension of staff to help answer the complex questions of emerging climate change adaption. Atter reviewing all the submissions and the results Of the evaluation process, I recommend ICF Incorporated, the top-ranked proposer,as the prime consultant.After discussing with staff, it is dear that ICF,based on its prior experience and its multi- disciplinary team,ICF is extremely well qualified to lead the City in this engagement ICF has responded with a multi-disciplinary team that has a very broad range of experiences relating to the scope of the RFQ,induding(among other factors):experience with the 100 Resilient Cities organization;a top risk modeling firm as its partner;and,extensive local knowledge,including team ' members from Florida Atlantic University and other local participants,covering both the analytical and the unique South Florida perspective.The ICF Team specifically bungs: - ICF: Interdisciplinary learn experienced in business case analysis,include climate change risk,and cost and benefit analysis AIR Worldwide:Advanced risk modeling,recently selected by FEMA to inform federal flood risk analyses • Kimley-Horn:municipal infrastructure design and urban planning •FAU Center for Environmental Studies:economic assessments of ecosystem values littps://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?IteniID=627 &Meet... 2/21/2018 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 24 Coversheet Page 5 of 5 • Brizaga,Inc:local expertise in communicating sea level rise risks and adaptation strategies Additionally,regarding the establishment of a pool of prequalified consultants,while it is in the City'sbest interest to maintain a relatively large pool of potential consultant to assure that the City's need for services in the future is met it is Unlikely that the City will need 12 firms.I have reviewed the proposals submitted_and the results.of the Evaluation Committee process for the remaining firms.In doing so,I note that the City is fortunate to have had so many qualified firms respond to the RFQ.In'determining the number of firms to recommend for the pool of consultant,I recommend Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and-Infrasttucture,Inc., as the second ranked proposer;AECOM Technical Services,.Inc.,as the third ranked proposer;The.Balmoral Group;as the fourth ranked proposer;Hazen and.Sawyer,as the fifth ranked'proposer;CH2M HILL Engineers,Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer;and Amp USA,Inc.,as the seventh ranked proposer.Including these six firms will capture each evaluation committee member's top two rankings.While the remaining firms ranked 8th through 12th are well qualified in their own right none wasranked higher than fourth place by any evaluation committee member Additionally;some of these firms are already included as part of the teams, submitted by the recommended prime consultant and others already have contracts with the City'through which the City could requestservices should the need arise: Therefore,I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into. negotiations with ICF Incorporated, LLC, as.the top ranked proposer, to serve as the City's Prime/Lead Consultant; further, establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants relating to the City's stormwater resiliency program business case analysis projects,on an as-needed basis,and with respect to the.pre-qualified consultant pool,authorize the Administration to enter-into negotiations with Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure,Inc.,as the second ranked proposer;AECOM Technical Services,Inc., as the third ranked proposer;The Balmoral Group,as the fourth ranked proposer;Hazen and Sawyer,.as the fifth ranked proposer; CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc.,as the sixth ranked proposer, and Arup USA, Inc.,as the seventh ranked proposer, and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. Further, I recommend that three locations be selected for analyses, with the following different'characteristics: one that is substantially completed,a second that is primarily residential,and a.third with business activity. The location details,scope,and timeline would be further discussed through negotiations with the selected Prime/Lead Consultant and the consultant pool, as applicable. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Ensure Reliable.Stormwater Management And Resiliency Against Flooding By Implementing Select Short And Long-Term Solutions. Including Addressing Sea-Level Rise FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services,determined upon successful negotiations,are subject to funds availability approved.through the • City's budgeting process. Grant funding will not be utilized for this project Legislative Tracking Office of the City Manager/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description D .Attachment A:Evaluation'Committee Scoring and Ranking:. O Resolution. • • • https://miamibeachnovusagenda.corn/agendapublc/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=627 &Meet... 2/21/2018 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 25 EXHIBIT F REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) s. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 26 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY: PROGRAM 2017-300-KB RFQ ISSUANCE DATE:SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS DUE: NOVEMBER 13, 2017 @ 3:00 PM ISSUED BY: MIAMI BEACH KRISTY BADA, CONTRACTING OFFICER III PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian,Avenue, 3rd'Floor, Miami Beach, FL 33139 305.673.7000 x 0218 I kristybacla@miamiloeachfl.gov I www.miamibeachfl.gov RFQ-2017-300-KB. Page 27 • • MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS • SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 NOT UTILIZED N/A 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 3 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS&FORMAT • 13 0400 EVALUATION PROCESS 15 APPENDICES: PAGE • APPENDIX A RESPONSE CERTIFICATON,QUESTIONNAIRE AND AFFIDAVITS 17 APPENDIX B "NO BID?FORM 24 • • APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS&SPECIFICATIONS 26 , •APPENDIX D• SPECIAL CONDITIONS 29 APPENDIX F INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 32 • • • • • • • • • RFQ 2017-300-KB 2 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 28 MIAMI BEACH •SECTION 0200 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications(RFQ)is issued by the City of Miami Beach,Florida(the"City"),as the means for prospective.Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and cost Statement of Qualifications(the"proposal")to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein.All documents released in connection with this solicitation,including all appendixes and addenda,whether included herein or released under separate cover,comprise the solicitation,and arecomplementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and,subsequently,the successful proposer(s)(the"contractor[s]")if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes PublicPurchase (www:publicpurchase.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchase must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failureto receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2.PURPOSE. The City is soliciting proposals from qualified firms that can provide the City with business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies:(the°Work"). Through this RFQ, the City intends to select one or more firms thatcan provide.the City with resiliency related business case analysis(es)as required. The business case study(ies) requested include economic analysis(es)of the value of our risk reduction investments to address flooding and sea level rise. Thisanalysis should explain the risk cost of inaction (in dollar tem :)and the extent to which the risk cost is likely to be reduced as a result of the city's infrastructure investments (also in dollar terms). The Work may consider the complex relationship and impact(s) among City investments (that reduce risk to flooding and sea level rise) to the City's property tax base, flood insurance, real estate market and financial mortgage cycles,and City credit ratings,land use issues,or any other factor that may be pertinent to the Work. • Additionally, the terms "FIRM", "PROPOSER", °CONSULTANT", "PRIME PROPOSER"' or 'TEAM" are used interchangeably and shall refer to the firm that will contract with the.City for the development and implementationof the project Additional detail and project description is provided in the attached Minimum Requirements and. SpecificationsSection(Appendix C).. The City may,after considering proposals received,award contracts for services to a.prime consultant(s),as.well as create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants,as follows: 1. Prime'Consultant(s).The City may make an award to qualified'consultant(s)that can act in the capacity of the City's prime consultant for business case analysis(es) of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies.The Consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City of Miami Beach through the decision-making process to develop business case analysis(es) of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades, other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies.While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant,it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest Additionally,the City reserves the right to engage other consultants, either through option 2 below or through other means,to assistthe,Cityin its development of business case analysis(es)of the City's stormwater infrastructure.program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies. • RFQ 2017-300-KB 3 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 29 MIAMI BEACH; 2. Pool of Pre-qualified Consultants.Additionally,to assist with smaller engagements relating to business case analysis(es) of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades, other resiliency measures, or adaptation strategies (or related needs), the City intends to, create a continuing pool of prequalified consultants(not selected in Option 1 above): Firms that submit a proposal pursuant to the RFQ,and who are deemed to be responsive,responsible and best qualified may be eligible to participate in the continuing pool of pre-qualified consultants. The firms included in the continuing pool will also be eligible to participate as sub-consultants to the prime consultant on applicable projects at the discretion of the City Manager.. The process for considering qualifications proposals shall be as follows:. 1. City will consider proposals received on or before the due date. 2. All responsive proposals will be submitted to the Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager for evaluationin accordance with the criteria established herein. Proposals deemed non-responsive will not be considered by the Evaluation Committee. 3. The City Manager will consider the results of the Evaluation Committee process and may recommend, in accordance with Section.19 below,one(1)or more Proposers to be short-listed by the City Commission to enter into contract negotiations. 4. The City intends tocontract with a single prime proposer,but reserves its rights to contract with additional prime proposers,in accordance with Subsection 2.1 above.. 5. Other responsive, responsible and best qualified Proposers may be eligible for the continuing pool of prequalified consultants inaccordance with Subsection 2.2 above. GruEN;THAI THE CITY INTENDS TO AWARD A PRIME CONSULTANT AND ALLOW OTHER'RESPONSIVE, -RESPONSIBLE,AND.'QUALIFIED PROPOSERS TO BE INCLUDED IN A CONTINUING POOL. OF PREQUALIFIED CQNSULTANTS„ALL QU LIFIED FIRMS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND TO THISAta 3.SOLICITATION TIMETABLE.The,tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 29,2017 Pre-Submittal Meeting October 10,2017 at 9:30am Deadline for Receipt of Questions. November 3,2017 at 5:00pm Responses Due November 13,2017 at 3:00pm Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval TBD Contract Negotiations Following Commission:Approval 4.PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contac; Telephone: Email: Kris Bada 305-673-7490 kris bada'amiamibeachfl.aov additionally, the City Clerk is to be coiled on all communications via e-mail at: afaelGranado• miamibeachfl.•ov; or via facsimile:786-394-4188. RFQ 201.7-300-KB • 4 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 30 MIAMI BEACH The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten(10)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications.will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. •5.PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S).Only if deemed necessary by the City,a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s)may be scheduled. • A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as, scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department • Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3b Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attendance(in person or'Jiatelephone) is encouraged and recommended,as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested,in participating in the Pre-Proposal.Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1)Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2)Enter the MEETING NUMBER:5804578 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. • 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers'are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any'information received at pre- .submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by. the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through PublicPurchase. Any prospective proposer who has received this .RFQ by any means other than through PublicPurchace must register immediately with PublicPurchase to assure it receives any addendum issued to.this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7.CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ issubject to,and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are compliedwith,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions,as prescribed therein,including rendering their responsevoidable,in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranadd $miamibeachfl:gov. 8. SPECIAL NOTICES. You are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: http://web.miamibeachagov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=79113. . • CONE OF SILENCE CITY CODE SECTION 2-486 • PROTEST PROCEDURES CITY CODE SECTION 2-371 t r 2017-300-KB 5 RFQ-2017-300-KB - Page 31 MIAMI BEACH • DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS , CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 • LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-481 THROUGH 2-406 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS CITY CODE SECTION 2-487 • CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOBBYISTS ON PROCUREMENT ISSUES CITY CODE SECTION 2-488 • REQUIREMENT FOR CITY CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE EQUAL BENEFITS FOR CITY CODE SECTION 2-373 DOMESTIC PARTNERS • LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENT CITY CODE SECTIONS 2-407 THROUGH 2-410 • PREFERENCE FOR FLORIDA SMALL BUSINESSES OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY CITY CODE SECTION 2-374 VETERANS AND TO STATE-CERTIFIED SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES • FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE CITY CODE SECTION 70300 • ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS& CITY CODE SECTION 2-449 SERVICES 9. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goodsor services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work,may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity,may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultantunder a contract with a public•entity, and may not.transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017,for CATEGORY TWO fora period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list 10.COMPLAINCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS.This RFQ is subject to,and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsiblefor ensuring that all City lobbyist laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as,prescribed therein, including, without limitation,disqualification of their responses,in theevent of such non-compliance., 11.'DEBARMENT ORDINANCE: This RFQ is subject to,and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,-the City's Debarment Ordinance as codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 12.WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. This RFQ is subject to, and all.Proposers are expected,td be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign•Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code._Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their responses,,in the event of such non-compliance. 13.CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Department with its response or within five(5) days upon receipt,of request The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among others,the conflict of interest lobbying and ethics.provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County; . 14.AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA).Call 305-673-7490 to request material in accessible format;sign language interpreters(five(5)days,in advance when possible),or information on access for persons with disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public Works,Department, at 305-673-7000, Extension. 2984. 15. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS.The City reserves the right topostpone the.deadline for submittal'of proposals and will makea reasonable effort to give at least three (3) calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through PublicPurchase. 16: PROTESTS. Proposers that•are not selected may protest any'recommendation for selection of award in• RFQ 2017-300-KB 6 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 32 MIAMI BEACH: accordance with eh proceedings established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures„as codified in Sections 2- 370 and 2-371 of the City Code (the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest Ordinance shall be barred. 17.NOT USED. 18.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE.Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374,the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s),or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise,and which is within five percent(5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount (or in this RFQ, the highest proposal amount). Whenever,as a result of the foregoing preference,the adjusted pricesof two (2) or more proposers which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ or oral or written request for quotation,and such proposals are- responsive,responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service,then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 19.DETERMINATION OF AWARD.The final ranking results of Step 1 &2 outlined in Section 0400,Evaluation of -Proposals,will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals.The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369,including the following considerations: (1)The ability,capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract (2),Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference. (3)The character,integrity,reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract The'City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such.recommendation. The City Commission may also,.at its option,reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest.ofthe City,or it may also reject all Proposals. 20. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding,the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a, contract It is alsounderstood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property,contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to;approved by the City,and executed by the parties. RFC 2017-300-KB 7 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 33 MIAMI BEACH; 21. POSTPONEMENT/CANCELLATION/ACCEPTANCEIREJECTION. The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion,reject any and all,or parts of any and all,responses; re-advertise this RFQ;postpone or cancel,at any time,this RFQ process;or waive any irregularities in this RFQ,or in.any responses received as a result of this.RFQ. Reasonable efforts will be made.to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty(120)calendar days after proposal opening date.A proposer may withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty(120)calendar days from the date of proposal opening by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Department of Procurement Management prior to award of the contract by the City Commission. 22;PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY.Before submitting a response,each Proposer shallbe solely.responsible for making any and all investigations,evaluations,and examinations,as it deems necessary,to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to'make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations,will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. • 23.COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS.All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals, or any work performed in connection therewith,shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. 24.RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY.It is the intent of the City,and Proposers hereby acknowledge and agree,that the successful Proposer is considered to be an independent contractor, and that neither'the Proposer, nor the Proposer's employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the City. ( 24. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic • substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained from the manufacturer. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to consider a proposer's history.of citations and/or violations of environmental regulations in investigating a proposer's responsibility,and further reserves the right to declare a proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrant such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and dispositions thereof. The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or violations.Proposer shall,notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or violation which proposer may receive after the proposalopening date,and during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it 26.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and State taxes. 27. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms; conditions, specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing,and all instructions.pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to'do so will. be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. 28.PAYMENT. Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services have been received,inspected,and found to comply with contract,specifications,free of damage or defect,and are properly invoiced. Invoices must be consistent with Purchase Order format REQ 2017-300-KB 8 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 34 MIAMI BEACH 29.COPYRIGHT,PATENTS&ROYALTIES.Proposer shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Miami Beach,, Florida,and its officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,from liability of any nature or kind,including cost and . expenses for,or on account of,any copyrighted,patented,or unpatented invention,process,or article manufactured or used in the performance of the contract,including its use by the.City of Miami Beach, Florida. If the Proposer uses any design,device or materials covered by letters,patent,or copyright,it is mutually understood and agreed, without exception, that the proposal prices shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design, device,or materials in any way involved in the work. 30.DEFAULT.Failure or refusal of the selected Proposer to execute a contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission,or untimely withdrawalof a response before such award is made and approved,may result in a claim for damages by the City and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list 31.MANNER OF PERFORMANCE.Proposer agrees to perform its,duties and obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local,State,County,and Federal laws,rules,regulations and codes. Lack of knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way be a cause for relief from responsibility.Proposer agrees that the services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, experienced,certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently , • required by applicable laws,rules,and regulations. Proposer further certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses,permits,registrations,authorizations,or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full force and effect during the term of this contract Failure of Proposer to comply with this paragraph shall constitutea material breach of this contract Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract resulting from this solicitation„the contractor will assume the full duty,obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and assure all work complies with all applicable laws. The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer,or its officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,for failure to comply with applicable laws. 32. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Any and all. Special Conditions that may' vary from these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 33. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202, Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race,color,religion,sex or national origin. In accordance with the City's 'Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual • orientation,marital and familial status,and age or disability. RFQ 2017-300-KB 9 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 35 MIAMI BEACH 34. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY.The.city-may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, technical,and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including past performance(experience),in making an award that is in the best interest of the City,including: A.Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility-may be made prior to the award of contract B.Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. C.Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for a reasonable period of time,and have sufficient financial capacity,equipment,and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms.and conditions of this solicitation. D.The terms "equipment and,organization",as used herein shall,be construed to mean a fully equipped and well established company in line with the best business practices in the industry,and as determined by the City: of Miami Beach. E.The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial,technical,and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer,including past performance(experience),.in making an award that is in the best interest of the City. F.The City may require Proposer s to show proof that they have been designated as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances,the City may also require • material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, packaging, and characteristics of the products to:be supply to the Citjr. 35.ASSIGNMENT.The successful Proposer shall not assign,transfer,convey,sublet or otherwise dispose of the. contract,including'any or all of its right,title or interest therein,or his/her or its power to execute such contract,to. any person;company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City,. 36. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits,,and inspection fees required to.complete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 37.OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE.When the successful Proposer(s)is in agreement,other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at theoptionof the unit of government or non-profit agency.• 38.VOLUME OF WORK TO BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods. and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However„the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or-on an as-needed basis through the City's spot market purchase provisions. 39. DISPUTES.In the event of a conflict between the documents,the order of priority of the documents shall be as' follows: 'A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitatiion;,then. B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking,precedence;then C. The solicitation;then • D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. REQ 2017-300-KB 10 •RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 36 • MIAMI BEACH] , 40.INDEMNIFICATION.The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability,,losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers,employees,agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims,demands,suits, causes of actions or proceedings of'any kind or nature arising out of,relating to or resulting from the,performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all clains and losses in connection therewith,and shall investigate and defend all claims,suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable,including appellate proceedings,and shall pay all costs,judgments,and attorneys fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expresslyunderstands and agrees that any insurance protection.required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided.The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement • 41.CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 42.FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW.Proposers are hereby notified that all Bid including,without limitation,,any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1),Florida Statutes,and s.24(a),Art 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally,Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including;but not limited to, agreement to(a) Keep and maintain publicrecords that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order toperform the services;(b)provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public,agency would provide they records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in • this chapter or asotherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exemptfrom public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; (d) Meet all requirements for retaining public 'records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the'contractor upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements: All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 43.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS.Proposers are expected to be familiar with,and comply with,all Federal,State, County,and City laws,ordinances„codes,,rules and regulations,and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which,in any manner,may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ (including,without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act,Title'VII of.the Civil Rights Act, the EEOC Uniform Guidelines, and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s)onthe part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 44.CONFLICT OF INTEREST.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director, agent or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. REQ 2017-300-KB 11 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 37 MIAMI BEACH; • 45.MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS.A Proposer may submit a modified.Proposal to replace all or any portion of'a previously submitted Proposal up:.until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered. Proposals shall be irrevocable until:contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date,or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the Proposal due date and before said expiration date,and letters of withdrawal received after contract award will not be considered. 47.EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ. Proposers must clearlyindicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this,RFQ,and outline what,if any,alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated,in writing,in the'Proposai. The City,at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected,the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ'to which Proposer took exception to (as said term and/or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). 48.ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS,SERVICES.Proposers shall not offer anygratuities,favors,or anything of monetary valueto any official,employee,or agent of the City, for the purpose of influencing consideration of this Proposal. Pursuant to:Sec.2449 of the City Code,no officerr or employee of the City shall accept any gift,favor.or service that might reasonably tend improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. 49.SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ solicitation process. 50.ADDITIONAL SERVICES.Although this solicitation and resultant contract identifies specificgoods,services,or facilities (°items"), it is hereby agreed and understood that the.City, through the approval of the.Department and Procurement Directors (for additional items.up to $50,000) or the City Manager (for additional items greater than $50,000),may require additional items to be added to the Contract which are required to complete the work.When additional items are required to be added to the.Contract, awarded vendor(s), as applicable to the item being requested,under this contract may be invited to submit price quote(s)for theseadditional requirements.. If these quote(s)are determined to be fair and reasonable,then the additional work will be awarded to'the current contract vendor(s)that offers'the lowest acceptable pricing. The additional items shall be added to this,contract by through a Purchase Order(or Change Order if Purchase Order already exists).In some cases,the City,may deemit necessary to add additional items through a formal amendment to the Contract,to,be approved by the City Manager. The City may determine to obtain price quotes for the additional items from other vendors in the event that fair and reasonable pricing is not obtained from the current contract vendors,or for other reasons at the City's discretion. - Balance of Pane Intentionally Leff Blank RRC)20.17-300-KP • 12 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 38 MIAMI BEACH • SECTION 0300 SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1.SEALED RESPONSES.One original Statement of Qualifications (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format(CD or USB format)are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted:solicitation number,solicitation title,proposer name,proposer return address.Statement of Qualifications received electronically,either through email or facsimile,are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS.Statement of Qualifications are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids.Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of Statement of Qualifications will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays,natural or otherwise. 3.STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability,facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of Statement of Qualifications, it is strongly recommended that Statement of Qualifications be organized and tabbed in accordance with the sections and manner specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Statement of Qualifications that do not include the required information will be deemed non-responsive and will not be considered. TAB 1 Cover Letter&Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents.The cover letter must indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. 1.2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A). Attach Appendix A fully completed and executed. 1.3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements.Submitverifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C,Minimum Requirements and Specifications. TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm.The successful Proposer or Team should have experience/expertise in some. combination of economic analysis, cost/benefit analysis,risk modeling, risk management, insurance, and/or lending; with knowledge and understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerability to sea level rise,our unique topography and our engineering efforts to date; The City is seeking a multidisciplinary and innovative team that can partner,with Miami Beach to inform the decision-making process'as we invest today's flood protection and adapt to tomorrow's sea level rise scenarios.. Submit detailed information regarding the firm's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation,including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the proposer submitsas evidence of similar experience',the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email,'and year(s) and term of engagement. 2.1.1.If applicable,submit detailed information regarding the firms experience as a Platform or Strategy partner with 100 Resilient,Cities. 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team.The successful Proposer or Team should have experience/expertise in some combination of economic analysis,cost/benefit analysis,risk modeling,insurance,.and/or lending;with knowledge and • • RF Q.2017-300-KB 13 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 39 MIAMI BEACH /understanding of Miami Beach's vulnerability to sea level rise,our unique topography and our engineering efforts to date. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each. team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members'qualifications.A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.2.1.If applicable,submit detailed information regarding the firms experience as a Platform or Strategy partner with 100 Resilient Cities. • TAB 3 Approach and Methodology 3.1 Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology proposer has used on other related projects, including detailed information,as applicable,on the following: 1. Analysis related to the complex relationship and impact(s)among City investments(that reduce risk to flooding and sea level rise) to the City's property tax base, flood insurance, real estate market and financial mortgage cycles,,and City credit ratings;and 2. Land use issues relating to matters of infrastructure program analysis, resiliency measures, or adaptation strategies;and , 3. Innovative analysis or studies that have helped clients in addressing issues and responses relating to resiliency,sustainability,and adaptation. Note: After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposer (or proposer team members or sub-consultants) todetermine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). RFQ 2017-300-KB 14 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 40 • MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0400 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION • 1.Evaluation Committee.An Evaluation.Committee,appointed by the City-Manager,shall meet to evaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the requirements set forth in the solicitation. If further information is desired, Proposals may be requested to make additional written submissions:of a clarifying nature or oral: presentations to the Evaluation Committee.The evaluation of Statement of Qualifications will proceed in a two-step process as noted below.It is important to note_that the Evaluation Committee will score the qualitative'portions of the Statement of Qualifications only. The Evaluation Committee does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager.The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who,will utilize the results .tomake a recommendation to the City Commission. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received,the City Manager,after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFP,' • may,without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into, negotiations.The City,in its discretion,may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Step 1 Evaluation. The first step will consist of the qualitative criteria listed below to be considered by the Evaluation Committee. The second step will.consist of quantitative criteria established below to be added to the Evaluation.Committee results by the Department of Procurement Management An Evaluation Committee;appointed by the City Manager,shall meet toevaluate each Statement of Qualifications in accordance with the qualifications criteria established below for Step 1,.Qualitative Criteria. In doing so,the Evaluation Committee may review and. score all proposals received,with or without conducting interview sessions. Step 1-Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points • Experience and Qualifications of the Prime Proposer&Team 60 Approach and Methodology 40 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 • 3. Step 2 Evaluation. Following the results of Step 1 Evaluation of qualitative criteria,the.Proposer may receive • additional quantitative criteria points to be added by the Procurement Department to those points earned in Step 1, as follows: Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Maximum Points Veterans Preference 5 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP2POINTS 5 • RFO 2017-300-KB S • • • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 41 MIAMI BEACH] 4. Determination of Final.Ranking.At the conclusion of the.Evaluation Committee Step 1 scoring, Step 2 Points will be added to each evaluation committee member's scores by the Department of Procurement Management Step 1 and 2 scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C • 80 Committee Step 2 Points ®®® Member I IEMIIMMEMMIIIIIMI Committee EMEMEMZEligiEl111111 Member 2 ®i r r 80. Committee Ste.2 Points ®®® ,Member 2 ®i II :E :1 ZaiMilinil.11111=1121111•111111MIEI Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 *Final Ranking ispresented to the City Manager for further due diligence and recommendation to the City Commission. Final Ranking does not constitute an award recommendation until such time as the City Manager has made his recommendation to the City Commission, which may be different than final ranking results. RRQ 2017-300-KB 1 6 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 42 APPENDIX A AA I AM I B EACH Response Certification , Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit 2017-300-KB Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program Update PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RIO 2017-300-KB 17 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 43 • Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: 2017-300-KB Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program Update Procurement Contact: Tel: Emelt Kristy Bada 305-673-7490 kristybada@miamibeachtgov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose:The.purpose of this.Response Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form.is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,and.to collect necessary,information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with,requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements_Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and. executed. 1. General Proposer Information. • FIRM NAME: • NO.OFYEARS IN BUSINESS: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST.10 YEARS: • FIRM PRIMARYADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): • • CITY: • STATE: • ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: •. TOLL FREE NO.:, FAX NO::. FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: • STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARYAGCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: • ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: • ACCOUNT REP EMAIL; FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO:: The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s)',including but not limited any firm or principal • information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any'information the City deems • necessary to.evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. • R• FQ 2017-300-K13 18 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 44 • • 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Proposer daiming a veteran owned business status? YES NO • SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose,in,their Proposal,the names)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate. family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any-of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name , of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly;an interest of ten(10%)percent or-more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:.For eachreference submitted,the following information is required:1)Firm Name,2)Contact • Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4).Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. • 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has'Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performanceb an public sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is.`YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing,the.reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490.of the City Code.Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions,as prescribed therein',including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-Consultants)with a controlling financial interestas defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling finandal interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receiptof request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with allapplicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics • provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. • SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit_firm's.Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance;the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available atwww:miamibeachfi qov/procurementlscroll.aspx?id79113', 7. Living Wage.Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as same.may be amended from time to time,Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012)1,the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr.with health benefits,and$12.92/hr.without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may,by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau.of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City RRQ 2017-300-KB 19 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 45 may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year,if itdetermines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal,under which the City may, at its sole option,immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive,.and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines,as provided in the City's Livings Wage Ordinance,as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www:miamibeachft:gov/procurer=tiefxol[aspk?id=79113 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contractsvalued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business .with the City.of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide'Equal Benefits°to their. employees with domestic partners,as they provide to employees with.spouses.The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach; Florida;and the Contractors employees located in the• United States,but outside"of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing workon the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO ) B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or • to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the°other section any additional benefits not already spedfied. Note: some benefits.are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the.spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health " Sick Leave • Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside ydur.control,(e.g.,there are no insurance . providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance:To comply on this basis,you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed far condideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available atwww.rhiamibeachfi gov/precUremeriti i'olLaspx?id=79113 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor.list following a conviction fora public entity crime may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply ar a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;.may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287•.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittafis required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees ( with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. • Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the RRQ 2017-300-KB 20 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 46 business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,induding the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial statics,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi„nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is requird.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain.in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement.Pursuant to Section 2-376 of the City Code,the City shall not enter into any contract resulting from a competitive solicitation, unless the proposer certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in Article V of Chapter 62 of the City Code('Fair Chance Ordinance"),and which,among other things,(i)prohibits City contractors,as an employer,from inquiring about an applicants criminal history until the applicant is given a conditional offer of employment;(ii)prohibits advertising of employment positions with a statement that an individual with a criminal record may not apply for the position,and(iii)prohibits placing a statement on an employment application that a person with a criminal record_may not apply for the position. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required at this time. By virtue of executing this affidavit, Proposer certifies that it has adopted policies,practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance. Proposer agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request. Proposer further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract,.and shall entitle the City to the -- immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition toany damages that may be available at law and in equity. 11 Acknowledgement of Addendt,m. After issuance of solicitation,the City may-release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements.'The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of.Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has.received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. • Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Inial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 • Addendum 12 • Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. • 14. Financial Capacity.Each proposer shall.arrange for Dun&Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein.No proposal will be considered without receipt,by the City,of the SQR directly from Dun &Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.Proposers are responsible for the' accuracy of the information contained in its SQR.Itis highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City'and as early as possible in.the solicitation process.For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process,contact Dun&Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: titq�i:Aupplierportal.dnb.coinfwebapplwcsistoreslsen itet/SuripIierPortal7storeld=11696 RKY 2017-300-KB . _ 21 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 47 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any,action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in' failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviates from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the!City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information'and assurances, induding finandal and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant induding, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,'shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals.It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances es to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipients own risk.Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation;or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disdaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a.Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto,are approved and executed by the parties,and then only.pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be.accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,-without any resultant liability to the City. _ The City is govemed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law,and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disdosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted insealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses.At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and'declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges,and agrees that the City has the right.to make any,inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications,and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation:Each.Proposer certifies that the information contained'in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as,agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure'and Disdaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disdaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. RFQQ•2017-300-KB 22 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 48 • • PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I, as an authorized agent of the,Proposer,.am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto,and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement;proposer agrees to be bound'to any-and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted;Proposer has not divulged,,discussed, • or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party,to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained'in.this proposal, inclusive of the Statemenfof Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized.Representative:, Title of Proposer's Aulhodzed Representative: Signature of Proposer,s Authorized Representative: Date: • State of FLORIDA ' ) On this_day of ,'20_personally appeared before me who County of • ) stated that(s)he is the. of ,a corporation,and that the'instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority'of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntay act and ideed.Before me: Notary Public for the State of Florida • My Commission Expires: • • • • RRQ 20.17-300-KB 23 • • • • • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 49 APPENDIX B M I AM I BEACH " No Bid " Form 201 .7-300-KB Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program Update PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note. It is important fd'r those,vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond,to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides. the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid"may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City, RFQ 2017300-KB 24 RFQ-2017-300=KB Page 50 Statement of.No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S)CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: _Workload does not allow us to proposal _Insufficient time to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications _Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements _Do not offer this product/service _OTHER.(Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future,proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note:Failure to respond,either by submitting a proposal or this completed form; may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN:Kristy Bade STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS#2017-300-KB 1755 MERIDIAN AVENUE,3`"FLOOR MIAMI BEACH,FL 33139 RFQ.2017-300-KB 25 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 51 APPENDIX C AA I ANA B EAC H Minimum Requirements & Specifications 2017-300-KB Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program \Update PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2017-300-KB • • 26 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 52 • C1.Minimum Eligibility Requirements.The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit, with its proposal, the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement Proposers that fail to include the required submittals with its proposal or fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have itsproposal considered. 1. The prime proposer shall demonstrate experience in providing consulting services in the areas of sustainability,resiliency,adaptation strategies,or risk management/mitigation to at least one(1)public sector agency. • Required Submittals:For each qualifying project,submit project name,project description,start and completion dates,project contact information(phone and email),volume of contract,and firms role. C2.Statement of Work Required. At its core,the business case study requested is an economic analysis of the value of our risk reduction investments to address flooding and sea level rise. This analysis should explainthe risk cost of inaction(in dollar terms)and the extent to which the risk cost is likely to be reduced as a result of the city's infrastructure investments(also in dollar terms). This analysis will also consider the complex relationshipsbetweenthe anticipated reduction in risk cost and: • our private property tax base; • flood insurance(both future FEMA models/FIRM maps and private market rates); • the availability and affordability of private property mortgages over mortgage cycles; • the city's municipal credit rating and insurance premiums; • land use issues; - • any other factor that may be pertinent The Work would not just explain these interdependent relationships and so help decision-makers. It would also be an evidence-based tool to communicate`the city's risk reduction investment If done right, it could be a tool for decision-makers that illustrates in economic terms the best case and worst case scenarios. C3. Task Orders. All work assigned pursuant to any agreement resulting from this RFQ will be awarded via a Task Order or Consultant Service Order approved by-the City Manager. In award work,the City may award in the following manner: C3.1.Pilot The Pilot phase would be an analysis of a completed projector a sample neighborhood project. This would be a smaller engagement in scope with quicker results focusing on two risks: the five-year storm in combination with 2060 southeast Florida sea level rise scenarios. This would examine the risks in two-ways: without any infrastructure improvements and with the current stormwater intervention. The Pilot would analyze how the inaction and action may affect the City's property tax base,flood insurance,real estate market and,financial mortgage cycles,and credit ratings. RFQ 2017-300-KB 27 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 53 • C3.2. Ongoing: This may include the analysis of additional risks andadditional adaptation investments at a project or program level,that may be an expansion or continuation of the project in other areas of the City or may be a new scope altogether. The proposing teams are encouraged to present innovative decision-making tool(s). The tool(s)should be designed to facilitate a review of engineering and science-based solutions. It should compare the solutions with the current costs. It should also compare thecost over time and the triple bottom line value (economic, - • • environmental,social) to the City of Miami Beach in the short term (5 year),mid-term (10 to 20 year)and long term(30+years). Approach 2 would provide the.ability for the City to analyze how the inaction and action may affect the City's property tax base,flood insurance,real estate market " and financial mortgage cycles,and credit ratings,land use issues,or-any other factor that may be pertinent to the Work. • • • RIO 2017-300-KB 28. • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 54 APPENDIX D AAIAAAIBEAcH Special Conditions 2017-300-KB Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program Update PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFO 2017-300-KB 29 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 55 • 1.TERM OF CONTRACT.Five(5)years. 2.OPTIONS TO RENEW.Option to renew is at the discretion of the City for two(2)additional two(2) year periods. 3.PRICES.Not Applicable. • 4.EXAMINATION OF FACILITIES.Not Applicable. 5.INDEMNIFICATION.Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers,employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and,all liability,losses or damages,including attorneys'fees and costs of defense,which the City or its officers,employees,agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims;demands,suits,causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of this.Agreement by the Provider or its employees, agents, servants, partners principals or subcontractors. Provider shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims,suits or actions of any kind or nature in,the name of the City,where applicable, including appellate proceedings,and shall pay all costs, judgments,and attorney's fees which may issue thereon.Provider expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Provider shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify,keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees,agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. 6.PERFORMANCE BOND.Not Applicable. ' 7.REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS.Not Applicable. 8.SHIPPING TERMS.Not Applicable. 9.DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS.Not Applicable. 10.WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS.Not Applicable. 11.BACKGROUND CHECKS.Not Applicable. 12.COMPETITIVE SPECIFICATIONS.It is the goal of the City to maximize competition for the project among suppliers & contractors. Consultant, shall endeavor to prepare all documents, plans & specifications that are in accordance with this goal.Under no condition shall Consultant include means &methods or product specifications that are considered"sole source"or restricted without prior written approval of the City. 13. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS. This RFQ, including the attached Sample Contract, contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract.By virtue of submitting a proposal,consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at thetime services are requested,either through a separate agreement,work order, letter of engagement or purchase order. 14.CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER.A change in the Consultant's project manager(as well as any replacement)shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement(including reassignment)of an approved REQ 2017-300-KB 30 • RFQ-2017-300-KB1 Page 56 project manager or public:information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval.of the City Manager or his designee(i.e. the City project manager). 15.SUB-CONSULTANTS.The Consultant shall not retain,add,or replace any sub-consultant without • the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the.City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City.of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the soleresponsibility Of Consultant, 16. NEGOTIATIONS.Upon approval of selection by the City Commission,negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually. acceptable Agreement, including final scope of services,deliverables and cost of services. • Remainder of Page intentionally Left Blank • • I � t -3 o- B 31 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 57 APPENDIX E AA I AM I BEACH Insurance Requirements 2017-300-KB Business. Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program Update PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RIO 2017-300-KB 32 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 58 MIAMI BEACH • INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS This document sets forth the minimum levels of insurance that the contractor is required to maintain throughout the term of the contract and any renewal periods. XXX 1. Workers'Compensation and Employer's Liability per the Statutory limits of the state of Florida., XXX 2. Comprehensive General Liability (occurrence form),limits of liability$ 1,000,000.00 per occurrence for • bodily injury property damage to include Premises! Operations; Products, Completed Operations and- Contractual Liability. Contractual Liability and Contractual Indemnity. (Hold harmless endorsement exactly as written in"insurance requirements"of specifications). XXX 3. Automobile Liability-$1,000,000 each occurrence-owned/non-owned/hired automobiles included. 4. Excess Liability-$ .00 per occurrence to follow the primary coverages. XXX 5. The City must be named as and additional insured,on the liability policies;and it must be stated on the certificate. _6. Other Insurance as indicated: _Builders Risk completed value $ .00 _Liquor Liability $ .00 _Fire Legal Liability $ .00 • _Protection and Indemnity $- .00 _Employee.Dishonesty Bond $ .00 Other $ .00. XXX 7. Thirty(30)days written cancellation notice required. XXX 8. Bests guide rating B+:.VI or better,latest edition. XXX 9. The certificate must state the proposal number and title The City of Miami Beach is self-insured.Any and all claim payments made from self-insurance are subject to the limits and provisions of Florida Statute 768.28, the Florida Constitution, and any other applicable Statutes. • Q 2 - 00- 33 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 59 l , • MIAMI BEACH • City of Miami Beach,1755 Meridian Avenue,31d Floo'r,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachll.gov PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 305-6737490 Fax 7863944002 ' ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)No.2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY • PROGRAM • November 8,2017 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is being issued to provide clarifications and revisions issued by • the City. The REQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I. RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME. The.deadline for the receipt.of bids is extended until 3:00 p.m., on Friday.November 17, 2017,at the following location: . • , City of Miami Beach Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Late proposals will not be accepted. Proposers are cautioned to plan sufficient time to allow for traffic or other delays for which the Proposer is solely responsible. II. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-in Sheet , . Exhibit B: Vendor Access Report • III. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS AT THE PRE-BID MEETING AND VIA EMAIL. Q1: What's the budget for the work? Al:The budget has not been determined. Q2: What are the deadlines—for questions,proposals,contract,commencement,completion? A2: Deadline for questions was November 3, 2017 at 5:00pm, and the proposals due date is stated above. The contract term will be for a period of five 95)years with the option to renew at the City's sole discretion for two(2)additional two(2)year periods. Q3: Please send me a,list of your registered vendors. A3:Please refer to Exhibit B. Q4: During the pre-submittal meeting a question was asked with regard to AECOM's ability to respond to this RFQ since they are the program manager for the City's stormwater implementation. Is AECOM able to.respond to this RFQ? 1 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)No.2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM • • • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 60 • • A4:No firm will be allowed to conduct a business case analysis on its own work. Q5: We are requesting the sign in sheet from the pre-proposal meeting, including phone attendees. A5:Please refer to Exhibit A. Q6: Regarding the minimum eligibility requirements, Appendix. Cl. "The prime proposer shall demonstrate experience in providing consulting services in the areas of sustainability, resiliency, adaptation strategies, or risk management/mitigation to at least one (1) public sector agency." As indicated by `or, are theminimum eligibility requirementsfor any one of the services listed or for ALL of the services listed? A6: The sentence states `or' for the miminum requirements. However, it is recommended that proposers provide all relevant experience to deliver a complete business case analysis as indicated in Section 0300 Submittal Requirements, Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications. Q7: What is the City's schedule for this work? A7: The scope will be developed based on the qualificiations and experience of the proposers, and the City's stormwater program and needs. The.City would like a first business case analysis work product in the Spring of 2018. Q8: Does the veteran-owned preference apply to subconsultants listed'on the proposal? A8: The veteran-owned preference applies to the firm submitting a proposal in response to the RFQ. , Q9: Item 11 on page 21 of the RFP states that"Resolution 2016-29375... prohibits, official City travel to the states of North Carolina.and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi." In order to satisfy the requirements of Resolution 2016-29375 is it sufficient that our primary project team membersare staffed in states other than North Carolina and Mississippi? Or is the interpretation of Resolution 2016- '29375 that none of the project team members for the:project be located in North Carolina.or Mississippi? Our project team for this project will be directed, managed and staffed primarily from our Florida and Missouri offices,while our firm is headquartered and incorporated in the State of North Carolina. So we are looking for.clarification on how to staff the remaining project team. A9: The referenced resolution prohibits the purchase'of goods or servicessourced in , North Carolina and Mississippi. Therefore,the resolution prohibits the actual provision of services to be generated from locations within these states. The provision of ' services from locations within other states is'not impacted by the resolution. ' Q10:_ Are we permitted to change the Notary public signature block on Appendix A from Florida to;a 1 different state? Although we have 'a local presence, our contracts department is. based elsewhere. A10: Yes, Q11: What modeling efforts and scenarios has the City undertaken as it relates to,the Stormwater Management System currently under construction?Specifically, what modeling software was i, used and what SLR projections and storm events were simulated? • ' All:The City has.been using a rainfall of 7.5 inches in 24 hours for past modeling,but 2 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)No.2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS.OF THE_CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 61 last month the City Commission approved an increase to 8.75 inches in 24 hours and the distribution used is based on the Soil Conservation Service Type III. The sea level use for the backwater/boundary in the Bay was set and approved by Commission about ' 3 years ago as a sea level of 2.7 feet NAVD elevation. If high tide levels continue to trend up as quickly as seen in the past three years, this elevationmay have to be reevaluated. The model that is being used is the ICPR model that South Florida Water Management District has used for this area. The model has to be adjusted for the use in this area with reduced peaking factors and minimum ground storage found in Miami Beach.. \ Q12: If a firm is listed as a.subconsultant for a firm not selected for award by the City, is that firm eligible to be considered for the pool of pre-qualified consultants, or does the subconsultant also need to submit a separate proposal as the prime consultant? - Al2: Any firm wishing to be considered for this project should submittia proposal. Q13: It was mentioned during the pre-bid meeting that firms may submit a package•to be qualified for the pool of sub-consultants.What is the submittal criteria for sub-consultants if they do not have direct experience in the scope listed? A13: Any firm wishing to be considered shall submit its proposal in accordance with the Submittal requirements in Section 0300 of the RFQ. Q14: For firms that-are exempt from Workers'Compensation requirements under state law, will the certificate of exemption from each officer satisfy the insurance requirements for the City of Miami Beach? A14: Insurance requirements will be addressed during negotiations with the successful proposer. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at .RafaelGrenado@rniamibedchfi.gov. Procurement.Contact: Telephone: Email: Kristy Bada 305-673-7000,ext.6218 KristyBada@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ arerequested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders"questionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal.,' Sincerely, ,, lex Denis Procurement Director - • 3 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS'(RFQ)No.2017-30.0-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS.OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 62 • r Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Meeting Sign-in Sheet 4 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)No.2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS.OF THE.CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM RFQ-2017-300-KB • Page 63 • AMAMI BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: Tuesday.October 10,2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM NAME 1OM1Ar4Y N1 PrfOE#• , EAX : MA ADDRESSKristyBada Procurement:CMB 305-673-7000 ext.6218 kristybacla(@,miamibeaChfl.gov • Tai-ctie„ft CAT111 s",is,540(it'es, m lz.14("(1,SOLd • F A_C4 -ill - hCet, rot Q co", . j ,K)A,0 1,0116 Cotb C 11,0 3'6 - -700 arrz or.06.-1 twiey,a,;tiol;4e1, -r2S. o' Nt 0.1-0 TiMn 00-AIA .11;k51-10 7-6 0-"itc(54v fp pippm-rrAi fed 1,e opt [ _ Ktivl fv9 401-11 Oc a.. e--r-c' de rricA., 1.61,41; (06,,41 --hormori L Vo — .--TE:xy (2)' AL 1 KSIN.olt<krt rho%/1-;9k.A SH-ok..As.c‘;10..Aat..t.Q.,etuvet. 6.44 30.5:_gt g kr•1/4t4.- €061-GY UleNtbeAve. Ro-I3e441 Vo ' Ieck. kwx-e- -Fe stc.t 904- 'Ill- oioe-ccea..Nta v1/4A 44 t-444.&VA / • Ksate4.4 At44M-11( 45'd.5'20.7 $94. 1 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 64 MIAAAIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM NAME COMPANY NAME (MASI,PRO : • ,�,1�1A1L ADD�tT�S� • 2 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 65 AAIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: Tuesday, October 10,2017 TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM .; . (POW IIMN,T) — , ..... '..E.i/IMI.,:k6i/Litgg.. 'L'—:'---: . —. '!"; •1.., • • • s 3 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 66 • • MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: Tuesday, October 10,2017 . TITLE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ) 2017-300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAR Co h Vex once. Cc, 1 !as — COMPANY NAIVIl �rr,r�fiS 1'RIN > PIION # . :Fix# • E IIIAIL AI DR,SS: • John &'A' ' rzeitbK DP Ha ,h 61,Astillitn b1111 LVOLIGj siDoriguroi AE Mi 1 Pe,�Yc nor i Mico M4W c) h Ket9ec .VAS cvbeck ' ' • Lj'oavi • irG Lar'C (2aY•CA 't a0 AVv p Wel )0111100? ArIAP • •4 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 67 • • U • • Exhibit. B: Vendor Access Report • I • • • • 5 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS(RFQ)No.2017300-KB FOR BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 68 Access Report Agency City of Miami Beach Bid Number 2017-300-KB Bid Title BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIP Vendor Name Accessed First Time Most Recent Access Aptim Environmental&Infrastn.2017-10-19 01:42 PM EDT 2017-10-19 01:44 PM EDT Jxe,Inc. 2017-10-18 09:04 PM EDT 2017-10-18 09:25 PM EDT Atkins North America 2017-10-11 05:31 PM EDT 2017-10-11 05:31 PM EDT HR&A Advisors 2017-10-10 09:39 AM EDT 7017-10-1009:40 AM EDT Charter Communications 2017-10-03 06:55 AM EDT 2017-10-03 06:55 AM EDT MLM-Martin Architects,Inc. 2017-09-29 05:04 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:04 PM EDT Bender&Associates Architects 2017-09-29 05:25 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:25 PM EDT ICF International 2017-10-05 05:41 PM EDT 2017-11-08 04:05 PM EST PRIME AE Group,Inc. 2017-10-27 05:38 PM EDT 2017-10-27 05:38 PM EDT Wade Trim 2017-10-02 02:00 PM EDT 2017-10-02 02:01 PM EDT Waypoint contracting,Inc. 2017-10-03 10:55 AM EDT 2017-10-0311:03 AM EDT ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEER 2017-10-09 02:58 PM EDT 2017-10-0902:58 PM EDT Ricardo Vieira 2017-10-03 02:41 PM EDT 2017-10-03 02:58 PM EDT Perkins+Will 2017-09-29 05:09 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:09 PM EDT Onvia 2017-09-29 07:13 PM EDT 2017-09-29 07:13 PM EDT Gustafson Guthrie Nichol 2017-09-29 05:05 PM.EDT 2017-09-29 05:05 PM EDT GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 2017-10.23 12:12 PM EDT 20.17-10.23 1.212 PM EDT A&P Consulting Transportation 2017-10-19 03:23 PM EDT 2017-10-19 03:23 PM EDT EMA,Inc. 2017-10-04 03:02 PM EDT 2017-10-04 03:02 PM EDT Llorente and Heckler 2017-11-07 11:37 AM EST 2017-11-08 12:44 PM EST MWH Americas,Inc. 2017-09-29 05:02 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:02 PM EDT Singhofen&Associates,Inc. 2017-09-30 04:38 PM EDT 2017-10-24 11:21 AM EDT INTERA Incorporated 2017-09-29 05:38 PM EDT 2017-10-02 10:35 AM EDT Kimley-Horn and Associates,In 2017-10-02 07:28 AM EDT 2017-10-17 11:02 AM EDT WEST Consultants,Inc 2017-10-02 03:24 PM EDT 2017-10-02 03:32 PM EDT Water&Air Research,Inc. 2017-10-02 09:35 AM EDT 2017-10-02 09:35 AM EDT Brizaga,Inc. 2017-09-29 05:04 PM EDT 2017-11-07 01:42 PM EST Perkens WS Corporation 2017-10-03 12;50 AM EDT 2017-10-26 03:19 AM EDT Art Of Form Architectural Servic 2017-10-11 11:26 AM EDT 2017-10-11 11:26 AM EDT Aptim,Inc. 201.7-09-29 05:24 PM EDT 201.7-09-29 05:24 PM EDT Kiewit Infrastructure South Co 2017-10-04 03:31 PM EDT 2017-10-04 03:33 PM EDT Hazen and Sawyer 2017-1.0-17 10:11 AM EDT 2017-10-31 09;36 AM EDT Powell Electrical Systems Inc. 2017-10-02 09:08 AM EDT 2017-10-02 09:08 AM EDT Envisors,-a Division of Pennoni 2017-10-03 11:30 AM EDT 2017-10-03 11:30 AM EDT Webtech 2017-10-03 12:08 AM EDT `2017-10-0a12:11 AM EDT Sam Anderson Pvt,Ltd 2017-10-05 02:30 AM EDT 2017-10-25 11:21 AM EDT Durba Construction 2017-10=02 08:45 AM EDT 2017-10-02 08:45 AM EDT Media Analytics 2017-10-31 08:23 AM EDT 2017-10-31 08:23 AM EDT KPMG LLP • 2017-10-30 12:44 PM EDT 2017-10-30 12:45 PM EDT Moffatt and Nichol 2017-10-02 10:48 AM EDT 2017-10.02 10:48 AM EDT Taylor Engineering,Inc. 2017-10-02 08:32 AM EDT 2017-10-02 08:32 AM EDT FLORIDA RESEARCH 2017-10-02 02:02 PM EDT 2017-10-02 02:02 PM EDT Stantec Consulting Services,In 2017-10-02 10:18 AM EDT 2017-10-02 10:18 AM EDT PlaceMakers,LLC 2017-10-02 01:14 PM EDT 2017-10-02 01:15 PM EDT Arup North America Ltd 2017-11-08 11:06 AM EST 2017-11-08 11:25 AM EST 300 Engineering Group,P.A. 2017-10-12 09:08 AM EDT 2017-10-12 09:08 AM EDT • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 69 • American Textile&Supply, Inc 2017-09-29 04:57 PM EDT 2017-09-29 04:57 PM EDT . DPZ Partners LLC 2017-10-06 10:49 AM EDT • 2017-10-06 10:50 AM EDT APTIM 2017-10-04 03:54 PM EDT 2017-10-04 03:54 PM EDT North America Procurement Co 2017-10-02 03:03 PM EDT 2017-11-06 11:33 PM EST Alvarez Engineers,Inc 2017-11-07 04:31 PM EST 2017-11-07 04:45 PM EST MATEU Architecture Inc 2017-10-02 08:45 AM EDT 2017-10-02 08:45 AM EDT IHS Markit,Inc. 2017-10-03 02:51 PM EDT 2017-10-04 12:58 PM EDT Johnson Engineering,Inc. 2017-10-02 10:29 AM EDT 2017-10-02 10:29 AM EDT Lanzo Companies 2017-10-04 01:50 PM EDT 2017-10-04 01:50 PM EDT SEQUIL Systems,Inc 2017-10-04 05:01 PM EDT 2017-10-04 05:05 PM EDT Worldwide Technologies 2017-10-03 02:24 AM EDT 2017-10-06 04:29 AM EDT Mathematica Policy Research 2017-10-04 11:16AM EDT 2017-10-04 12:02 PM EDT Grand Cayon Minority Contractc 2017-10-04 12:47 AM EDT 2017-10-04 12:49 AM EDT The Blue Book Building&Cons 2017-10-10 12:24 PM EDT 2017-11-06 09:45 PM EST Alden Research Laboratory,Inc 2017-10-02 08:38 AM EDT 2017-10-02 08:46 AM EDT Coastal Systems International, 2017-09-2905:02 PM EDT 2017-10-24 12:26 PM EDT • SRS Engineering,Inc. 2017-10-03 10:45 AM EDT 2017-10-05 09:54 AM EDT Symbiont 2017-10-02 12:40 PM EDT 2017-10-02 01:43 PM EDT OGM SUPPLY LLC 2017-10-26 10:58 AM EDT 2017-10-26 10:58 AM EDT Fishkind&Associates,Inc. 2017-10-04 07:08 PM EDT 2017-10-04 07:08 PM EDT CEEPCO Contracting 2017-09-30 09:58 AM EDT 2017-09-30.09:58 AM EDT Sniibbs Consulting Inc 2017-10-06 09:24 AM EDT 2017-10-0609:32 AM EDT Cambridge Systematics,Inc. 2017-10-02 09:28AM EDT 2017-10-0209:28 AM EDT • CH2M HILL Engineers,Inc. 2017-11-08 10:41 AM EST 20,17-11-0810:42 AM EST SO 2017-09-30 11:57 AM EDT 2017-11-08 03:34 AM EST Miller Legg 2017-09-29 05:23 PM EDT 2017-11-07 11:10 AM EST Dodge Data&Analytics 2017-09-29 06:46 PM EDT 2017=10-05 04:28 AM EDT IMS 2017-10-02 12:31 PM EDT 2017-10-02 04:28 PM EDT Arquitectonica 2017-09-29 05:04 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:04 PM EDT Bilzin Sum berg 2017-10-04 11:15 AM EDT 2017-10-04 11:56 AM EDT • Risk Management Solutions,In 2017-11-08 08:36 AM EST 2017-11-08 02:04 PM EST Moffatt&Nichol,Inc. 2017-11-07 12:20 PM EST 2017-11-08 10:21 AM EST Emmett Sapp Builders Inc 2017-10-02 09:37 AM EDT 2017-10-0302:34 PM EDT Tetra Tech,Inc. 2017-10-04 10:10 AM EDT 2017-10-04 10:11 AM EDT Ross construction 2017-11-03 11:15 AM EDT 2017-11-03 11:15 AM EDT Chen Moore and Associates 2017-09.29 06:26 PM EDT 2017-09-29 06:27 PM EDT RDH Building Science Inc. 2017-09-29 05:05 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:05 PM EDT Brierley Associates Corporation 2017-10-18 09:28 AM EDT 2017-10-18 09:28 AM EDT AECOM Technical Services,In(2017-10-02 10:10 AM EDT 2017-10-11 01:12 PM EDT McKim&Creed,Inc. 2017-10-31 11:15 AM EDT 2017-10-31 11:15.AM EDT Environmental Incentives 2017-10-19 01:45 PM EDT 2017-10-20 03:46 PM EDT Biscayne Engineering Compan32017-09-29 05:01 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:01 PM EDT GPI Southeast,Inc 2017-10-03 09:26 AM EDT 2017-10-03 09:26 AM EDT DHI Water&Environment,Inc. 2017-10-06 01:56 PM EDT 2017-10-06 01:56 PM EDT • The Balmoral Group 2017-10-02 07:54 AM EDT 2017-10-17 04:22 PM EDT Amec 1 oster Wheeler 2017-10-02 09:57 AM EDT 2017-11-08 08:19 AM EST • AECOM 2017-09-29 07:47 PM EDT 2017-09729 07:47 PM EDT Joshua Zinder Architecture+D 2017-09-29 05:04 PM EDT 2017-09-29 05:08 PM.EDT Construction Software Technok 2017-10-02 12:09 AM EDT 2017-11-07 12:45 AM EST Raftelis Financial Consultants,12017-10-03 01:09 PM EDT 2017-11-08 09:41-AM EST AECOM Technical Services,Inc2017-10-18 10:51 AM EDT 2017-11-08 07:42 AM EST M2E LLC 2017-10-02 08:19 AM EDT' 2017-10-02 08:19 AM EDT RFQ-2017-300-KB • Page 70 Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 2017-09-30 11:31 AM EDT 2017-09-30 11:32 AM EDT • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 71 EXHIBIT G CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 72 A.COM Ci y, f Miariaf4 - _� thsiss = •: e Analysis • ._, . iof the City6rMiarni Beach - . ry Stormwate ,Resiliency Progra - f ,. - - _. . . __ RFQ 2017-10044 4 ¢r - MTM .: I SMV v+.pA; 'moi.... W. C. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 73 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 74 O � n Section 1 , »r N(D cover Letter & 0. g: Minimum NJ Qualifications Requirements RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 75 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 76 1 .1 Cover Letter and Table of Contents 11fH iLt1i1T asiol X14 { I = t ti 1.1 !tr.- _._,...,.............7A, Yj—'•••• ; *.. app 'y 1•_. ..., ..J-. •f1c'— . 1 Cover Letter & Table of Contents .. 2 Experience & Qualifications 3 Approach and Methodology waw _-i.. ' lam.,.....�..... .. t tam' 1 w. •-„4 .,, " ma y;. .tees-��eM - $ .leir. - r eye 1 •,` ,'Y_ RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 77 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 78 AZCOM AECOM 305 444 4691 tel 800 Douglas Entrance 305 447 3580 fax North Tower,2n0 Roor Coral Gables.FL 33134 www.aecom.com November 17,2017 City of Miami Beach.Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach Florida 33139 Re: Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Stormwater Resiliency Program Dear Ms.Bada, Miami Beach has long been at the forefront in South Florida and nationally in planning and taking action to address flooding and sea level rise(SLR).AECOM understands the City desires to continue advancing implementation of its Stormwater Resiliency Program and is seeking consulting services to conduct business case analyses of the City's stormwater infrastructure program upgrades,other resiliency measures,or adaptation strategies.AECOM is honored to present its qualifications for the work that will support the City in making these assessments that will lead to smart decisions that continue to sustain and protect resources while supporting the continued growth of your vibrant community. Depth.AECOM offers cities the depth of resources and insight,with the breadth of expertise,to partner and assist them in furthering their goals.We draw on our diverse skills and services across the company to help make cities better places in which to live,do business and coexist with nature.We have worked with numerous cities across the country and globally in assessing climate change vulnerability,developing practical solutions,and putting those solutions into action. For the projects success,we offer our top economic analyst.Fellz Ventura.a 14-year expert with experience in economic analysis and strategy development in the U.S.,Latin America,and Asia.Feliz has worked on projects that seek to improve economic,environmental,and social outcomes for local communities and nations.The AECOM team presented in these qualifications has experience addressing South Florida's resilience challenges,including Miami Beach's Resiliency Program. and similar economic analyses in other vulnerable areas like Los Angeles.San Francisco.and Silicon Valley. With a seamless integration of many disciplines.AECOM helps clients build understanding of how to approach.understand, and maximize the returns to their investments in resilient strategies.We work with governments,private corporations and public sector clients on Infrastructure and resilience,and thus understand the challenges from marry perspectives. We invited and are pleased to include the qualifications of RMS.who will bring their expertise with probabilistic risk models for climate hazards and knowledge of the financial services sector to further expand the team. Knowledge.We know Miami Beach.For several years,AECOM has supported Miami Beach's Resiliency Program by helping the City evaluate and develop measures to combat the effects of sea level rise.The key objective has been to create a more resilient community.Our support has helped the City create and execute an encompassing roadmap for analysis and action. This work has Included review of the City's land development and building codes and recommended actions to improve resilience:assisting in the adoption of revised ordinances:strengthening the City's programs as part of the FEMA Community Rating System(CRS)to reduce Insurance costs:and assessment of the vulnerabilities and strengths of the City's assets to sea level rise.A key outcome has been the Guidance Document on Sea Level Rise Vulnerability,which includes the Adaptation Decision-Making Assessment and Planning Tool(ADAPT).This tool provides the City with consolidated information and processes to use for building resilience strategies Into City operations and capital investment decisions. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 79 We know the region.As Strategy Partner to Greater Miami&the Beaches,we work very closely with resilient teams in Miami-Dade County,the City of Miami,and Miami Beach.We understand the top resilience shocks and stresses the region is facing,and provide knowledge and support to address the discovery areas identified In the Preliminary Resilience Assessment. Innovation.AECOM thrives on innovation.Our goal is to be ahead of the issues,bringing ideas and lessons learned to create unique approaches and solutions.As demonstrated throughout our qualifications.AECOM has extensive experience working with cities to develop sustainability programs,solutions for building resilience,creation and assessment of climate adaptation strategies,and managing and mitigating the risks they face due to climate change.For the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission(SFPUC).AECOM provided a robust benefit-cost analysis and comparison between varied flood protection strategies,providing support of recommendations for capital planning.Similarly,for the Port of Long Beach, California,AECOM's work on the coastal resilience plan provides a framework for the Port to incorporate adaptive measures related to projected climate change into its policymaking and planning processes,construction practices,infrastructure design,and environmental documents. AECOM has reviewed RFQ 2017-300-KB.Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Stormwater Resiliency Program,and while it agrees with many of the terms included therein.It objects to others.In accordance with Item 47 of the RFQ,Exceptions to RFQ,"Proposers clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ,and outline what,if any,alternative is being offered.All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated,in writing,in the Proposal".We have summarized the exceptions and offered alternatives. The summary may be found on page 37 of this document. Our team will approach this opportunity with energy,enthusiasm and expertise.We share your values and the importance you place on making Miami Beach a safe,thriving,and resilient community. Respectfully yours. AtO tzt r.4 00c,///e, Marcia Tobin,AICP Agustin J.Bar-ra,AIA Project Director Vice President,Authorized Signatory Proposer Primary Contact 4 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 80 1 .2 Response Certification, Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit Solicitation No: Solialation Tile- 2017-300-KB Business Case Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Resiliency Program Update Procurement Conrad: Tel: Emal: Kristy Bada 305-673-7490 kristybada@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION,QUESTIONNAIRE&REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose:The purpose of this Response Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirement,and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME. AECOM Technical Services,Inc. NO.OF YEARS M BUSINESS: NO. YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: 47 40+77,630 Total/88 Coral Gables OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS Earth Tech,URS FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 1999 Avenue of the Stars.Suite 2600 CITY: Los Angeles STATE: ZP CODE. California 90067 TELEPHONE NO. 213-593-8000 TOLL FREE NO.: n/a FAX NO213-593-8178 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS. 800 South Douglas Road.2"d Floor,North Tower COY. Coral Gables STATE: Florida ZP CODE. 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATNE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Agustin J.Barrera ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305-447-3546 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.. n/a ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: gus.barrera©aecom.com FEDERAL TAX DENTIFICATION NO.: 95-2661922 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s),inducing but not limited to:any irm ar prindpal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 5 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 81 1 Veteran Owned Business.Is Proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES ✓ NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. n/a 2. Conflict Of Interest All Proposers must disdose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer,director, agent,or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. n/a SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposers must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates See attached Section 1.2.2 3. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solidtation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted,the following information is required: 1)Firm Name,2)Contact Individual Name&Ttle,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. See attached Section 1.2.3 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance b an public sector agency? V. YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:If answer to above is'YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). See attached Section 1.2.4 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions;as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Submit the names of all individuals or entities(including your sub-consultants)with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling finandal interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. n/a 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Department of Procurement Management with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations induding, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachloov/procurementiscrcil.aspx?id=79113 See attached Section 1.2.6 7. Living Wage.Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as same may be amended from time to time,Proposers shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.281hr.with health benefits,and$12.92/hr.without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may,by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City e AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 82 may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year,if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposers'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal,under which the City may, at its sole option,immediately deem said Proposer as non-responsive,and may further subject Proposer to additional penalties and fines,as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance,as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfi.qov/procurementiscroll.aspx?id=79113 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over S100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide'Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. and the Contractor's employees located in the United States,but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ✓ YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners'or to domestic partners of employees? I ✓ YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the'other section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health ,/ V Sick Leave V V Family Medical Leave ✓ ✓ Bereavement Leave V V If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control,(e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply an this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www miamibeachfl.gov/procurementrscroll.aspx?id=79113 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted a as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract to provide any goods a services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.237 017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Flonda Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 7 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 83 business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code,induding the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375, the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi,nor shall any product cc services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. 12. Fair Chance Requirement Pursuant to Section 2-376 of the City Code,the City shall not enter into any contract resulting tan a competitive solicitation, unless the proposer certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies, practices,and standards that are consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in Article V of Chapter 62 of the City Code("Fair Chance Ordinance"),and which, among other things,(i)prohibits City contractors,as an employer,from inquiring about an applicant's criminal history until the applicant is given a conditional offer of employment; (ii)prohibits advertising of employment positions with a statement that an individual with a criminal record may not apply for the position,and(iii)prohibits placing a statement on an employment application that a person with a criminal record may not apply for the position. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required at this time. By virtue of executing this affidavit, Proposer certifies that it has adopted policies,practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordnance. Proposer agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request. Proposer further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract, and shall entitle the City to the immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition to any damages that may be available at law and in equity. 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will stnve to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.can. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Mal to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial is Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt AJB Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. 14. Financial Capacity.Each proposer shall arrange for Dun&Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR)directly to the Procurement Contact named herein.No proposal will be considered without receipt,by the City,of the SQR directly tom Dun &Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the Proposer.Proposers are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR.It is highly recommended that each proposer review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process. For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process,contact Dun&Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: The Proposer shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https:llsupp I ierportal.dnb.comhvebapplwcsistoresiservletiSupplierPortallstoreld=11696 See attached Section 1.2.14 a A._CCM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 84 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,a in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications,or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before a after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications,may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviates from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion, the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disdosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals.It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipients own risk.Proposals should rely exdusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy,or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disdosure and Disdaimer,is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice.Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as,if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified,and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto,are approved and executed by the parties,and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City fa any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is govemed by the Govemmentin-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law.All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications,and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation.Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation, all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation,or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to $10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation,it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern.The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 9 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 85 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I, as an authorized agent of the Proposer , am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation,all attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto,and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement;proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted;Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Represertatve: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Agustin J.Barrera Vice President Signature of Proposer'a Authorized Representative: Date: // !/g•% State of FLORIDA } On this p day of 1w, ''", 0; personally appeared before me 1.0 'who CounV of AriAltx Dex. ) stated that (s)hg I the - E of /Ye Cf7I11 , a corporation,and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed.Before me: �� __�...� •Iwro Notary'ublic for s'P1oridfloiarY Public Siam of Fronda My • mission _ r.4!GG 036110 My Corner Expires Jin 2e,2021 Eluded tnrougn lUtrosli 1 t Y Asse. RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 86 1.2.2 CONFLICT OF INTEREST FLOOD RESILIENCE PROGRAM,SAN FRANCISCO To the best of our knowledge and belief,no member of PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION AECOM Technical Services,Inc.for the Business Case San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Analysis of the City of Miami Beach Stormwater Resiliency Stefani Harrison Program project or their immediate family member is an 525 Golden Gate Avenue employee of the City of Miami Beach.AECOM Technical San Francisco,CA 94102 Services,INc.is a wholly owned subsidiary of The T 415-551-4820 Earth Technology Corporation.The Earth Technology E soharrison@sfwaterorg Corporation is owned 100% by AECOM(formerly known The objective of this program is to provide a transparent as AECOM Technology Corporation).Thus,AECOM is the framework for evaluating the benefits of new capital ultimate parent.AECOM is a publicly traded company on projects to address urban flooding,the San Francisco the New York Stock Exchange NYSE under the symbol Public Utilities Commission(SFPUC)selected AECOM to ACM.There are no individuals,or City of Miami Beach perform an innovative benefit-cost analysis leading to employees,which own either directly or indirectly,an recommendations for capital planning. interest of 10%or more of our firm. 1.2.3 REFERENCES 1.2.4 SUSPENSION,DEBARMENT OR CONTACT CANCELLATION In addition to the qualifications found in Section 2 of this submittal,below we have provided three client references. AECOM Technical Services,Inc.('ATS")performs thousands of contracts each year. From time to time, FLOOD MITIGATION AND RESILIENCE PROGRAM occasions arise when ATS does not complete the City of Miami Beach performance of an awarded contract.These situations Susanne Torriente,Chief Resilience Officer/Assistant City include(i)where a client terminates the contract for its Manager convenience:e.g.where the client is unable to secure 1700 Convention Center Drive continued funding for the underlying project and,as a Miami Beach,FL 33139 result terminates the associated contract,(ii)where ATS T 305-673-7000 x6486 ceases performance under the contract in accordance E susannetorriente@miamibeachfl.gov with the applicable terms of the contract in response Bruce Mowry,PhD,PE,City Engineer to the client's nonpayment or other breach,and the T 305-673-7080 x6565 contract is ultimately terminated:and(iii)where one of the E bruce.mowry@miamibeachfl.gov contracting parties terminates the contract for default. Since 2014.AECOM has provided Flood Mitigation and Upon knowledge and belief,formed after reasonable Resilience Planning services,working closely with the City inquiry,during the past three years,ATS(i)has not Engineer,the Chief Resilience Officer,and the Director of failed to complete a contract where the other party to Environment and Sustainability. such contract was not in breach unless the contract afforded ATS that right and(ii)ATS has not had a contract PORT OF LONG BEACH CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND terminated by a client wherein that termination was COASTAL RESILIENCY PLAN ultimately determined to be other than for convenience Port of Long Beach except in the following instances: Justin Luedy 1. In August 2016,ATS received a letter from the 4801 Airport Plaza Drive Redevelopment Authority for the City of Milwaukee, Long Beach,CA 9815 asserting that the Authority considered its contract T 562-283-7100 with ATS terminated for cause.ATS believes the E justin.luedy@polb.com termination is unjustified and ignores relevant Project AECOM assisted the Port of Long Beach(Port)in history. ATS is contesting the termination,and will developing a Climate Adaptation and Coastal Resiliency actively work with the client to address the client's Plan(CRP)to manage the direct and indirect risks underlying concerns. associated with climate change and coastal hazards. 1.2.6 CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS AECOM's Code of Conduct directly follows. 1.2.14 FINANCIAL CAPACITY As requested in the RFP,AECOM arranged for Dun& Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report(SQR). BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY O F MIAMI STO R MWA TER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 11 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 87 12 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 88 A=COM Code of Conduct BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 13 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 89 A Message From the President and Chief Executive Officer As we have grown and evolved as a global company.much has changed. But one constant continues to be a vital part of our culture—our commitment to integrity and ethical business practices. We have succeeded in earning our clients'trust by delivering outstanding customer service and fully committing to acting ethically in all that we do. Integrity guides us as we conduct our business around the world. As employees,each of us is obligated to act with the highest degree of integrity and in full compliance with the law To help us understand the ethical and legal guidelines that must direct our business activities.we rely upon our Code of Conduct and update it periodically so that it remains timely and relevant to our work. Our Code is not a substitute for good judgment,nor does it cover every situation that you may encounter or every law that applies to us as a global company. It does.however,outline the basic legal guidelines that we must follow and the general ethical principles that will help each of us make the right decisions when conducting business worldwide. If you find yourself in a situation in which you are unsure how to act,believe that a violation of the Code could or has occurred.or have a question about a particular issue.please seek assistance Our Code contains a number of resources that you may use to resolve or report any issue related to ethics and compliance without fear of retaliation. You can be assured that the company will help and assist you in doing the right thing. Continuing to conduct our business in an ethical manner will help ensure long-term success for our company. our clients.our shareholders and our nearly 100.000 employees around the world You have my personal commitment that I will do all I can to ensure that the Code is observed and honored at every level of our great company. Thank you for your continued dedication and commitment to our culture of integrity and ethical behavior. Sincerely. /92- Michael Michael S.Burke President and Chief Executive Officer 14 A ECO M RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 90 r Purpose and Core Values Our purpose —to create, enhance Excellence and sustain the world's built, natural We earn and advance our reputation by delivering superior._., and social environments—unites value every that we undertake k" professionals working collaboratively Innovation • across a broad range of disciplines. u industry leadership depends on making grimier'sot I more excitingsustainable and cost-effective ,; Our core values recognize that our Agility business success is founded upon a commitment to certain principles. We rnove with speed and dexterity to adapt and adjust to 7 emerging client and protect requirements Integrity Safety We succeed by doing things the right waywith respect to Whether in an ofhcxr or on a construction site keeping our; ethics laws standards of quality.arid each other people safe is our most important measure,of success Employees Growth Our product Is our people our knowledge,skills,passion We rec:ognlze that our financial growth is the fairly earned lesult and diversity Our success begins with valuing our people and (Allying up to these pimples rostering their development Clients , We succeed by making our clients successful We embrace our '- clientschallenges and opportunities and weak for their success ti': BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 15 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 91 Table of Contents A Message from the CEO... — _ ii Our Shareholders,Business Partners and Customers Rely on Our Excellence..........__.__ 13 Our Core Values.... ....„_...._. .__......_.....__....._ Ili Providing Quality Products and Services 13 Licensing 13 Table of Contents..._.............. . .......__._Iv Charging Time 13 Accurate Books and Records 14 Introduction _ _ .,. _.1 Record Retention 14 Integrity in Everything We Do 1 Audits and Investigations 14 One AECOM,One Code 1 Financial Integrity 15 What Laws Should I Know and Follow? 1 Protecting Inside Information 15 Preventing Money Laundering 15 It's Up to You to Ask Questions Additional Expectations 15 and Report Concerns 2 Why Is Reporting Important? 2 Our Communities Rely on Our How Do I Raise Concerns? 2 Integrity&Innovation .18 What Happens Next? 2 Environmental Sustainability 16 Our Commitment to Non-Retaliation 2 Political and Charitable Contributions 16 Waivers 2 Responding to Media Inquiries 16 We Rely on Our Colleagues'Respect ._.__........_.._..3 It's Up to You Our Commitment to Diversity 3 Keeping Our Workplace Safe 4 Meeting Global Employment Standards 4 Leading with Integrity 4 AECOM Relies on Our Honesty ..._._..S Avoiding Conflicts of Interest 5 Avoiding Organizational Conflicts of Interest 6 Business Gifts and Entertainment 7 Protecting Company Property 7 Using Company Computer Systems 8 The Global Marketplace Relies on Our Integrity.—._ 9 Honesty in Everything We Do 9 Obtaining Business with Integrity 9 Competing Fairly 9 Handling Competitive Information 9 Avoiding Corrupt Practices 10 Conducting International Business 10 International Sanctions 11 Boycott Requests 11 Doing Business with the Govemment 11 Gifts and Entertainment for Government Officials 12 16 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 92 Code or Conduct,October 2011 1 Introduction Integrity in Everything We Do One AECOM,One Code At AECOM,we are committed to doing the right thing in all that We all have an obligation to read.understand and follow this we do.We believe this commitment to integrity has made our Code of Conduct It applies to all AECOM employees,officers company an industry leader,and wit continue to serve our and directors,including those of our subsidiaries and joint growth in the years ahead.This Code of Conduct("Code') ventures,where AECOM has the majority interest Further, addresses our company's professional,ethical,financial and we expect that our suppliers,agents,business partners, social values.It sets forth what is expected of all AECOM consultants and licensees will follow similar principles_Using employees,wherever we conduct business.Our Code also our Code to guide our actions allows us to preserve our represents our commitment to our clients,shareholders, reputation for doing business the right way. partners and the communities in which we live and work To this end,each of us must: Our Core Values are the foundation for this Code.The following - principles set forth the guidelines of behavior that we must follow Personally abide by the Code. -Not assist others in violating the Code. -Ethical behavior is the basis for everything we do. -Report any perceived violation or request that might -AECOM is committed to treating its employees fairly,and constitute a violation,by following the procedures outlined in providing each of us with opportunity for advancement the"Flow Do I Raise Concerns'?"section of this Code. and growth. -Take action as requested to remediate any potential -Teamwork,mutual respect and trust,and open violations or violations of the Code. communication are the foundations of AECOM's culture. -Complete training on the Code and other assigned learning -AECOM strives to be a responsible corporate citizen in the in a timely manner. communities in which we operate. -Meeting clients'needs is of utmost importance. You are responsible for reading and understanding the Code -We are committed to compliance with the laws,rules and and expected to abide by it Violations of the Code wit result in regulations applicable everywhere we conduct business- disciplinary measures,including termination of employment Our Code is meant to provide guidance regarding these AECOM also expects its consultants,subcontractors and principles.However,one document cannot possibly address other thud parties to be aware of and adhere to these ethical every law,rule,policy or scenario we may encounter in our daffy standards as described in this Code.If you become aware work.Nor is our Code a substitute for exercising common sense of any activity involving the conduct of these individuals that and good judgment,or seeking guidance when we need it violates the principles of this Code,you must disclose it to Management,Ethics and Compliance or In-House Counsel_ To help you determine whether a particular action is What Laws Should I Know and Follow? appropriate,ask yourself the following questions: AECOM is a worldwide company with operations in more than -Would my action comply with the spirit and purpose of 150 countries.Laws differ among the various locations where AECOM's policies'? we conduct business.Wherever we are located.we must -Would I feel comfortable about doing this,or would it violate know and follow the laws and regulations that apply to our my personal standard of conduct'? business and the countries where we operate.Many Fortune -Is this action honest in all respects'? 500 companies also have Codes of Conduct and may ask us -How might this action affect others'? to comply with them as part of our work.If you are ever unsure -Would this action embarrass me or AECOM if it became about whether a law,regulation or other obligation applies—or known to my clients,coworkers,professional colleagues, if there is a conflict between local law or another company's family or friends? code and this Code—contact Management or In-House Counsel for additional guidance. If you have any questions about this Code or any doubts about a particular course of action,you should consult with Management In addition,you must abide by AECOM's internal policies. Human Resources or an AECOM In-House Counsel.You may particularly the Delegations of Authority,as it is the basis for our also visit the Ethics and Compliance webpage on the AECOM authority to act on behalf of the company.The Delegations of intra net,where you can find links to AECOM's policies and Authority are available on myAECOM. procedures as well as processes and guidelines. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY O F MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 17 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 93 Code of Conduct,October 2014 2 It's Up to You to Ask Questions and Report Concerns Why Is Reporting Important? complete report Simply stated,it does not matter whether your It is important to raise questions and come forward with our report actually uncovers unethical behavior,but you must have concerns.Doing so reinforces our commitment to act ethically honest intentions in making it. in every business decision we make.Early detection also allows AECOM to address concerns before they become widespread At any time,you may in good faith report a suspected problems,and to take corrective action if necessary.Above all, violation of our Code,company policy or the law without fear AECOM is committed to maintaining a culture where each of us of retaliation or any adverse impact on your employment. feels comfortable asking questions,speaking up and working Individuals who take action against a person for making a report toward solutions. or participating in an investigation will face disciplinary action, up to and including termination.Likewise,anyone who makes a How Do I Raise Concerns? report not in good faith will be subject to disciplinary action. AECOM treats all reports confidentially to the extent our company is able to We do so consistent with the law,company O:Paulo,an AECOM technician,witnesses his policy and the requirements for conducting a thorough supervisor,Suzanne,being particularly harsh to investigation.Suspected violations may even be reported a few of his colleagues.Performance has been anonymously,where allowed by local law.To raise a concern or suffering lately,and Paulo assumes Suzanne is make a report,reach out to any of the following resources via simply frustrated with recent mistaken his team email,phone,letter or in person: has made.However,her behavior has become -Your supervisor or someone in Management more aggressive and morale on the team is low. -An AECOM In-House Counsel. She has recently begun berating team members -The AECOM Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer. to charge less time to overhead and more time -Using the AECOM Hotline by calling 1-888-299-9602(within to projects,even though their billable work has the U.S.and Canada)or 1-770-613-6332(outside the U.S. slowed down. and Canada).Please refer to the Hotline poster in your office Paulo feels that he should tell another member of for the number in your region or go to the AECOM Ethics Management about the environment Suzanne has and Compliance webpage on the AECOM intranet for a created,but is worried that he will be the next person comprehensive listing The toll-free number is staffed by she punishes What is his best course of action? a third-party company operating 24 hours a day,7 days a A:Paulo is right to be concerned about the hostile week with worldwide language capability.You do not have atmosphere his supervisor's actions have created. to give your name An Interview Specialist documents your While Suzanne's actions may or may not be a direct concern,assigns you a personal reference number and relays your concerns to AECOM. violation of our Code,the result of her behavior is a problem.Paulo should take the matter to Suzanne's What Happens Next? manager,or another resource with whom he feels AECOM promises to investigate all reports promptly,thoroughly comfortable,so that AECOM can investigate and and consistent with applicable law.Investigations will be kept resolve the issue.Paulo—and all other AECOM confidential to the extent possible.If necessary,AECOM may colleagues who make a good faith report of potential report certain investigations to the appropriate authorities Our misconduct—will be protected from retaliation after company will take appropriate corrective or disciplinary action making his report. for Code violations whenever necessary Waivers Our Commitment to Non-Retaliation In some cases,our company may waive compliance with this AECOM does not tolerate acts of retaliation against anyone Code.This means that waivers to this Code may be permitted who makes a good faith report of a possible violation,or who in certain instances.Such waivers will only be granted on participates in an investigation of possible wrongdoing.Acting a limited basis,and will be considered case by case.Only the in"good faith"means that you come forward with all of the Board of Directors may issue a waiver of this Code for a member information you have and believe you are giving a sincere and of our Board or an executive officer.Any waiver of this Code for a member of our Board or an executive officer will be promptly disclosed as required by applicable law,Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations,and the New York Stock Exchange(NYSE)listing standards. to AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 94 Code of Conduct,October 2014 3 We Rely on Our Colleagues' Respect Our Commitment to Diversity 0 Shanique is an engineer at AECOM and has AECOM is committed to fostering a workplace where we are all recently relocated to the Middle East to work on treated with dignity and respect.We believe our differing a large project.Most of her new colleagues have backgrounds,experiences and perspectives give our company been welcoming and helpful,making it easy for the strength we need to lead in our marketplace and reflect Shanique to settle in However,another AECOM our commitment to diversity.For these reasons.AECOM will colleague,Bruce,has expressed exasperation with not tolerate discrimination or harassment in the workplace.We the time it is taking Shanique to adapt to her new all have the responsibility to treat our colleagues—as well as work environment.Many times,Bruce rolls his eyes applicants for employment—with respect and in a fair,non- and sighs when Shanique asks him a question discriminatory manner. Lately,Bruce has begun asking Shanique."Don't they teach you anything in your country'"and AECOM offers equal employment opportunities for all applicants. implies that Shanique is ignorant and incompetent. This gives each of us equal consideration for employment. When Bruce invites her colleagues to go to lunch,he regardless of background.AECOM makes all decisions regarding does not include her Shanique now feels so recruitment,hiring,training,promotions,transfers and layoffs based on merit and never on any trait protected by law.Such uncomfortable around traits include,but are not limited to age,ancestry,color,sex,HIV Bruce that she avoids asking questions altogether, status,marital status,medical condition,national origin,physical causing her work product to suffer What can or mental disability,race,religion,sexual orientation,gender Shanique do'? identity and veteran and citizenship status. A:Learning to work in a new environment can be challenging—even more so when faced with Maintaining a respectful workplace also means that we never impatience or hostility.Shanique,like all AECOM engage in or tolerate any form of harassment To be clear, colleagues,deserves to work in an environment "harassment"is any action that creates or seeks to create a hostile, where she can be both comfortable and successful intimidating or offensive work environment.Harassing behavior can consistent with our comm itrnent to diversity and be sexual or nonsexual in nature.In either case,it has no place at inclusion.Bruce's behavior is depriving Shanique AECOM.Harassing conduct can include,but not limited to: of that right.If Shanique feels comfortable speaking –Verbal remarks(comments,suggestions,jokes or requests to Bruce directly,she should explain that his for sexual favors). comments about her are hurtful,offensive and need –Pictures(drawings,photographs or videos). to end.If Shanique doesn't wish to approach Bruce –Physical(drawings. behavior(suggestive looks,leering or directly,or Bruce's behavior doesn't end,Shanique unwelcomed touching). should reach out to her supervisor or Human Resources Representative for assistance. In any form,harassment is a violation of our Code and company policy.If you feel you or someone else is being harassed or discriminated against,report your concerns to Management. Human Resources or In-House Counsel right away. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 19 RFQ-2017-300-K13 Page 95 Code of Conduct October 2014 4 Keeping Our Workplace Sate Leading with Integrity Safety is an AECOM Core Value and the safety and security of Our leaders serve as resources and role models for proper our staff,our physical assets and the environment in which we business conduct For that reason,supervisors have additional operate is a shared responsibility of every AECOM employee. responsibilities when it comes to upholding our Code.They Each of us have both a moral and legal responsibility to comply are expected to promote a positive working environment where with all applicable laws and regulations,as well as our own people are treated with dignity and respect and feel comfortable internal requirements,related to safety,health and environmental raising concerns.Supervisors must also make an effort to (SH&E)aspects of the work we perform and the facilities we create a culture of compliance This can be done,in part,by: control.In order to assist our staff with this responsibility we maintain SH&E management systems,programs and procedures -Acting as role models for Code compliance. specific to each of our businesses In addition,we have published -Fostering an environment that encourages open discussion a global SH&E Policy Statement and SH&E Guiding Principles about legal and ethical concerns. that apply to all of our operations.If you have any indication that -Vigdantiy preventing and detecting violations of our Code, we are operating outside of our established business-level company policy or the law programs,or outside the requirements of our global SH&E Policy -Appropriately responding to inquiries about our Code andior Guiding Principles,report your concern to Management, -Immediately notifying In-House Counsel of any matter SH&E or In-House Counsel immediately reported to them. -Ensuring training is completed in a timely manner by A safe and secure work environment is one that is also free from all employees. violence.Threatening behavior—even if meant in jest—is never permissible at AECOM.If you witness or receive a threat or act of O Li is a manager heading one of AEC OM's key violence,report it to Management,Human Resources or In-House business initiatives His team isre Counsel immediately.If you ever face an immediate threat to your P Paring a bid to safety or that of your colleagues,contact local law enforcement a new client,a government-owned company in a immediately,and then report the incident internally country where AECOM has not done major business before.Ata meeting to discuss bid strategy,an Further,substance abuse compromises everyone's well-being. employee of another company teamed with AECOM, Drugs and alcohol negatively affect our judgment and could asks detailed questions about how AECOM will interfere with our ability to do our jobs safely.We are therefore handle compliance with anti-corruption laws and prohibited from working whie under the influence of alcohol or sanctions for the bid Li shuts oft discussion, drugs_This includes improperly used prescription medication that saying it's okay to take a few risks now and deal could diminish,or even raise questions concerning,our ability to with"the red tape"later once we win.Is this the perform at our best. right response'? Meeting Global Employment Standards A:No.Li should listen to the individual's concerns and As part of our commitment to our global community,we uphold ensure that his team is not pursuing a bid in a individual human rghts and follow employment laws in all the manner that could cause AECOM to jeopardize its reputation and compliance.When we are working locations where we conduct business.In support of this commitment, we provide reasonable working hours and conditions.Further, on new projects in new areas,it is critical that we AECOM has a zero tolerance policy regarding the use of forced labor educate ourselves on the national and international or human trafficking We will never knowingly conduct business with restrictions that will apply.Anti-bribery laws can subcontractors,business partners,suppliers or third parties who affect ourselection of local consultants,while violate these laws If you have mason sanctions may restrict dealing with or transferring to believe AECOM is conducting business with an entity engaging in technology to certain entities and individuals. The forced labor or human trafficking practices,report the misconduct to Delegations of Authority set out requirements for Management Human Resources or In-House Counsel immediately. HUB review that identify and mitigate these risks. Properly complying with these rules requires Keep in mind that our company operates in countries where we planning and oversight,but breaking them can do not have a permanent presence.Because of this.supervisors create catastrophic risk for AECOM, should seek guidance from In-House Counsel regarding the employment law standards governing these operations. 3 20 AcCOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 96 Code or Conduct.October/011 5 AECOM Relies on Our Honesty Avoiding Conflicts of Interest -investments AECOM does not seek to control our personal We each have a personal stake in acting in the best interest of financial decisions.However,some outside financial AECOM.To ensure our continued success,it is crucial that we interests may improperly influence—or could be perceived avoid conflicts of interest,whether actual,potential or perceived.A by others to influence—the decisions we make for AECOM. "conflict of interest"occurs when we use our position at AECOM,or Investments in AECOM's competitors,customers,suppliers information we have acquired during our employment in a way that or other business partners are generally acceptable.Further, may create a conflict between our personal interests and those of the amount of the investment must not be so significant to our company or its customers.In other words,if a situation anses you that it would affect your business judgment on behalf of that makes it difficult to act in an unbiased,objective manner on AECOM. AECOM's behalf,a conflict of interest may be present If a conflict of If you,or a member of your household,own or seek to own interest—or the potential for one—arises,you must disclosed to any such financial interest,you must promptly disclose the Management.Human Resources or In-House Counsel at once for matter and seek approvals from In-House Counsel re -I'ersruial Relationships Supervising anyone with whom you have a family or romantic relationship could give rise to the Of course,not all possible scenarios giving rise to a conflict of appearance of favoritism Therefore,we should never be in interest can be listed here.However,the following examples are a position where a personal relationship is also a reporting some of the more common conflict situations you are likely to relationship.These personal relationships include your encounter in your daily work immediate family members(such as your spouse,children, stepchildren,parents,step-parents,siblings,in-laws and -Business with Family and Friends Our decisions about any other members of your household)as well as romantic selecting suppliers,customers and other persons doing or or intimate relationships(such as a partner,fiance or seeking to do business with AECOM must be impartial.The fiancée,or domestic partner) If you find yourself in a sole criterion of any business decision must be whether position to supervise or otherwise make employment AECOM's best interests are advanced.If a family member decisions regarding family or partner,disclose the or close friend has an interest in a company with which we situation immediately. seek to conduct business,you must remove yourself tom the selection process and disclose the conflict immediately. Serving on a Board of Directors At times,we may seek to sit on a board of directors outside of AECOM.W hie impacting -Corporate Opportunities At times,we may learn of business your community by serving on a board of drectors for a opportunities through our employment at AECOM.We may non-profit organization is encouraged and does not require not take personal advantage of those opportunities or refer prior approval,you may only accept this position if it does not them to a third party,unless AECOM has had a chance to interfere with your ability to do your job However,serving evaluate the prospect and has decided not to pursue it on the board of directors for an outside company that does -Outside Employment Being employed by or consulting with business with AECOM requires advance approval.Always another organization could also create a conflict of interest contact Management Human Resources or In-House Counsel In general,we may not accept another job that interferes before accepting such a position,to include sitting on public with our ability to do our work for AECOM.This means we commissions,or taking public service appointed positions. may never conduct outside business during designated work hours or use AECOM's property,equipment or information Remember that prompt and full disclosure is requred for all for another business.Further,we cannot accept employment circumstances that you believe might constitute,or appear from a supplier or competitor of AECOM without an express to constitute,a conflict of interest If you are unsure,seek written waiver from In-House Counsel.In any case,prior guidance.Never engage in any conduct involving a possible written approval from In-House Counsel is required before or apparent conflict of interest unless you receive prior written performing any outside work_ permission from In-House Counsel. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 21 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 97 Code of-Conduct,Oclobei 2014 6 O.Abdul is an accomplished civil engineer who has Organizational conflicts of interest primarily arise as a result of put in many years of design work for AECOM.As the following three situations concerning AECOM's work: he nears retirement,Abdul is considering taking on part-time work as a design consultant. A current -Biased Ground tiules Situations in which a firm,as part business partner of AECOM hears about this and of fulfilling a contract,has set the ground rules for another immediately expresses interest in making use of contract,for example,by writing the statement of work Abdul's services if they will cost less than AECOM's or the specifications.In these"biased ground rules" rates Does Abdul need to discuss this with anyone? cases,the primary concern is that the firm could skew the competition,whether intentionally or not,in its own favor. A:Yes.While Abdul is still employed at AECOM,he These situations may also involve a concern that the firm, must not accept work from a business partner, by virtue of its special knowledge of the customer's future supplier or competitor of our Company.Doing requirements,would have an unfar advantage in competing so could create a serious conflict of interest. based on those requirements. Additionally,depending on the type of work Abdul is -unpaired Objectivity Situations where a fret's work performing,he m ust be careful not to disclose any under one contract could entad evaluating itself,either by confidential AECOM information—an obligation that applies even after his employment with contractorng yn assessmentopf work In these leted under contract or by evaluating proposals.In these"impaired AECOM ends.Before pursuing any opportunities objectivity"cases,the concern is that the firm's ability to with this business partner,Abdul must first check render impartial advice to the customer could appear to be with Management, or In-House Counsel to ensure undermined by its relationship with the entity whose work he is not entering into a conflict of interest product is being evaluated. situation. -Unequal Access to deformation.Situations in which a firm has Avoiding Organizational Conflicts of Interest access to non-public information as part of its performance of a contract and where that information may provide the firm When we work with government clients,we must be particularly a competitive advantage in a later competition for a second careful to avoid organizational conflicts of interest,as the contract In these'Unequal access to information"cases,the guidelines and restrictions for government procurement are concern is limited to the risk of the firm gaining a competitive very strict.Just as we must avoid situations that could make us advantage:there is no issue of bias. biased,we must also avoid working with others who could be unable to provide a client with impartial assistance or advice. In short,we must never hire contractors whose objectivity may be impaired,or who may have an unfair competitive advantage. We should exercise common sense,good judgment and sound discretion to assess whether a significant potential conflict of interest exists and work with Management, or In-House Counsel to develop an appropriate way to resolve it. 22 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 98 Code of Conduct,October 2014 7 Business Gifts and Entertainment Protecting Company Property and Data Privacy The mutual exchange of business gifts and entertainment We have worked hard to acquire our valuable assets,both helps us maintain strong business relationships with those physical and intangible.AECOM's physical property includes with whom we conduct business.However,conflicts can arise its buildings,facilities,vehicles,equipment,computer systems, if such exchanges imply that favorable treatment was given or resources and records.We are responsible for protecting such received,or if courtesies are offered to influence a business property from loss,damage.misuse,theft and waste We can decision.For this reason,we may only exchange gifts,meals or do this by using company resources wisely and only for entertainment after first consulting with In-House Counsel business purposes. In exchanging gifts.meals or entertainment,we must never It is also important to protect our intangible assets—things offer or accept these courtesies if like our reputation and goodwill in the communities in which we operate.Such assets also include our confidential information, –The other party is involved in an active procurement like business plans,intellectual property,proposals,technical with AECOM. innovations,designs,inventions,patents,financial information, –It is part of an agreement to do or receive anything in return. client lists and other information we produce as part of our work –It could intuence the recipient or the recipient's organization for AECOM.We may never reveal our company's confidential in any business dealings information to any outside parties unless we are properly –It is cash or a cash equivalent,such as gift cards, authorized or legally required to do so In addition,we may not certificates,coupons,loans,stock,stock options,etc. disclose such information to our colleagues who do not have –It is entertainment that is sexually oriented,offensive,in a legitimate business need to know it When you do have a poor taste or otherwise violates AECOM's commitment to business need to disclose such information to a colleague or mutual respect. third party,you must ensure that the appropriate confidentiality –It would violate any law,regulation,rule or the standards of agreement is in place.Remember,the obligation to protect the recipient's organization confidential company information continues even after your –It could be construed to be a brbe or a kickback_ employment with AECOM ends. –It might reasonably be interpreted as a reward for preferential treatment,actual or perceived,or as creating an obligation We also have a duty to protect employee data in accordance with on the other party applicable legal requirements.No one should access prospective, –It is lavish or extravagant current or former employee records—such as payroll,group –It happens on a frequent basis. insurance,benefits and working files—without proper authority. Even if we give or receive gifts that meet the criteria above,we If you discover or suspect the unauthorized use or disclosure of must always avoid creating even the appearance of bias.There confidential information,you should notify Management,or In- are additional considerations and requirements that apply to House Counsel of the situation immediately giving gifts to public officials,discussed in further detad in the"Avoiding Corrupt Practices"and"Doing Business with the In addition to protecting the confidential information of AECOM, Government"sections of this Code. we must also afford this same respect to the confidential information of our employees,clients,partners and other third One of AECOM's vendors in the U.K sponsors an parties. annual golf outing for its major customers each year with all expenses paid at an exclusive resort in Q.May t provide the addresses of our employees to Scotland.Because I use this vendoi's products on some of my protects at AECOM,the vendor has an outside organization that wants to offer them merchandise at a discount? invited me to go Can I accept/ A:No,as this would violate our privacy policy. A:No.This creates a conflict of interest,and you should Employee records are confidential and there is no decline the invitation.Accepting the golf outing may put valid business reason to provide this information. you in a position of obligation to the vendor.In addition, you may be viewed as accepting a gift or unusual favor because of your position at AECOM. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY O F MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 23 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 99 Code of Conduct,October 2014 a Using Company Computer Systems O Rafaella is working on a major bid and traveled Just as we have a duty to protect our company's assets,we share abroad with the rest of the AECOM team,prepai frig an obligation to use AECOM's computer resources,networks for a live presentation to the client at their and Internet and email systems responsibly and securely.These headquarters.Everyone on the team is going resources are provided for business purposes,and are intended to dinner at the hotel at which they are staying to be used for such.While AECOM allows incidental,occasional Rafaella is in her hotel room working on the pricing personal use of its Internet/email system,it must be kept to a minimum and not detract from our work.You must also take care details for the final presentation to the client She to avoid improper se such as: saves her work,leaves her laptop in her room and locks the door before she goes to dinner –Communicating inappropriate,sexually explicit or offensive Has Rafaella done all she can to protect AECOM statements that are not in line with our Core Values. property and information? –Viewing or sharing sexually explicit or offensive materials. A:No.While Rafaella has the right idea—keeping –Spreading profanity,derogatory remarks,discriminating or information locked up and out of plain view—even harassing comments,or threatening or abusive language. secure locations aren't perfectly safe.If someone –Downloading unlicensed or illegal material. enters her room and steals her laptop or downloads her data,they could have access to many of We should never use AECOM's networks or Internet/email AECOM's bid details,proprietary design materials, system to send,receive or store any messages we intend business plans and other private information.The to keep private.All information,data and files belong to best,safest option is to carry her laptop and all of our company,and—to the extent permitted by applicable law its confidential contents into the restaurant with her. —AECOM reserves the right to monitor or disclose any What may be a mild inconvenience to Rafaella now messages,documents or any other files on company or client computers without notice.We are expected to be familiar with could save her and AECOM from trouble later on. our company's information resources policies.These include, but are not limited to,policies concerning the appropriate distribution of email and compliance with copyright laws. AECOM understands the unique opportunity we have to engage with our stakeholders through social media.These include blogs,micro blogs(Twitter•),social networking sites(such as Facebook",Linkedln®),wikis,photo/video sharing sites and chat rooms.However,when utilizing these resources,we must keep in mind that electronic messages are permanent,transferable records of our communications.They can be altered without our consent,and can affect AECOM's reputation if released to the public.Therefore.we are expected to follow all AECOM policies and procedures when using social media and exercise good judgment and common sense.Never speak or act on our company's behalf unless authorized to do so. If you are aware of or suspect the inappropriate use of AECOM technologies or electronic communications,notify Management. Human Resources or In-House Counsel immediately.If you have any questions about who may communicate on a given issue,or whether a communication is appropriate,please see our Social Media Policy 24 ASCO RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 100 Code of-Conduct,October 2014 9 The Global Marketplace Relies on Our Integrity Honesty in Everything We Do we abstain from any activity that may violate or give the Our customer-centric ethic and mission orientation must never appearance of violating competition laws.While competition get in the way of complete honesty and accuracy in everything laws vary between the different countries where we conduct we say,do or write. business,these types of conduct are generally prohibited- Obtaining Business with Integrity -Agreeing on the prices,terms or conditions of sale for In order to serve our business partners to the best of our competing services or products. abilities,we must always be truthful about what AECOM can -Dividing or allocating customers,bids,markets or territories and cannot achieve.Any time we discuss our capabilities, for competing services or products. credentials,qualifications and corporate history,either -Agreeing to refuse to do business with particular verbally or in writing,we must make sure to be honest and third parties. accurate.Similarly,we will not make false statements aboutour competitors or their services,or use unfair practices against These rules apply to informal understandings as well as to competitors,such as obtaining their confidential information. formal agreements.In order to make sure that we are competing fairly,we should retain from discussing any of these It is also important to keep in mind that many of our clients have activities with our competitors—or from discussing any other strict rules about how to prepare and submit proposals to obtain matters that could be seen as an attempt to limit competition. their business,as well as rules for what types of information Behavior that violates these rules should be reported relating to a proposal we may receive tom the client's personnel.Each AECOM office is responsible for obtaining and Handling Competitive Information maintaining copies of relevant rules,and we must make sure In order to maintain our market position,we may sometimes that we know and follow the rules that apply to our work. need information about our competitors.We may use publicly available information,but must always make sure that we only Q A long-standing and important acqure information about our competitors in a legal,ethical g- g portant chant of AECOM has and responsible manner.For example,we must never pressure asked me to certify that improvements have been anyone to breach a confidentiality agreement,such as by asking made to their health and safety system as part of a colleague to reveal confidential information about a previous obtaining a government permit The improvements employer.We also should never attempt to gather information are in the process of being made,but would not be about our competitors through deceptive or misleading actions. completed by the time of the certification.Can I do If confidential information about a competitor is deliberately or this? inadvertently disclosed to you,discuss the issue with In-House A:No.If the improvements have not been made fully Counsel,and do not use it without express permission from(n- and completely at the time of the certification, House Counsel. you cannot certify that they have been made. Government and other entities rely upon Q.I am submitting a proposal and a friend at the client certifications and representations we make as organization has offered to share information about part of permitting and other approvals.False the client's selection criteria.May I receive it? certifications or representations directly violate A:No,unless doing so is consistent with the client's AECOM's commitment to integrity. rules.Typically,such rules would require the individual to obtain appropriate authorization to Competing Fairly provide this information and that the information Because AECOM competes based on the quality of our is being made available to all who are sutra itting products and services,we are committed to promoting fair proposals on the job.In some cases,accepting or competition at alt times.We must never engage in or support reviewing such information can invalidate our bid. unfar or predatory business practices or any activities that You should consult with your In-House Counsel would improperly restrain trade Similarly,it is critical that before accepting any such selection criteria or similar information. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 25 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 101 Code of Conduct October 2014 to Avoiding Corrupt Practices Anb-corrupton laws are complex,and the consequences for AECOM is proud of the work we do throughout the world violating these laws are severe Remember never to give We believe that our ability to continue to foster good working anything of value,even something you think is nominal,to a relationships with companies,communities and governments government official without frst receiving permission from In- around the world depends on acting ethically in all our business House Counsel.Additionally,you must report any requests made ' dealings This means we never give,offer or accept improper by a foreign government official for money or anything of value payments in any form Numerous countries,including the United States,United o:Jules,an AECOM employee in Latin America,was told that he could hire a consultant to acquire all Kingdom,Canada,Australia,Russia and other countries in of the necessary permits AECOM needs from a which we conduct business,have enacted laws that strictly prohibit the giving,receiving,offering or soliciting of bribes, foreign government to start a new project However, kickbacks or other improper payments to government officials. the consultant requested a U S $25,000 retainer A"bribe"is anything of value given in an attempt to influence an and said that he would use the money to"speed up official's actions or decisions,obtain or retain business,or the process."Since Julio doesn't know where the acqure any sort of improper advantage(such as obtaining money is going,and isn't the one using it,does he information that is normally unavailable or being allowed to need to say anything? submit a late bid or proposal). A:Yes.Julio must know where that money is going and for what purpose it is being used and the To be clear,"government officials"include federal,state, qualifications and reputation of the consultant provincial or local government employees,political candidates Moreover,he is required to take steps to ensure that and even employees of businesses that are owned by a this money is not used as a bribe.Julio must seek government.At AECOM,we also prohibit acts of"commercial the advice of Management and In-House Counsel bribery,"or offering or accepting a bribe to or from our customers,suppliers or anyone working on theirbehalf with the and comply with the Delegations of Authority before • intent of obtaining or retaining business. proceeding with this consultant. Similarly,we must never offer or accept a"kickback,"which is Conducting International Business the return of a sum already paid(or due to be paid)as a reward With operations throughout the world,AECOM is truly a global for making or fostering business arrangements We may not company.For this reason,it is critical that all of our activities retain a third party or enter into a joint venture or other business • fully comply with the export control laws and regulations of association to engage in any activity that we are prohibited from the United States,the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions participating in ourselves. where we do business Laws governing trade are complex,but if we do not follow them,we risk losing our ability to conduct Anti-corruption laws also address facilitating payments. business internationally "Facilitating payments"are small,infrequent payments made An"export'occurs when a product,service,technology or piece to a government official to expedite the performance of routine government actions such as issuing visas and work permits. of information is shipped to a person in another country.In However,these payments are prohibited in many countries.Our the U S.,an export can also occur when technology,technical company does not permit facilitating payments except in cases information or software is provided in any way(including of clear and present danger when they are necessary to prevent verbally.in the case of information)to a non U.S citizen, immediate harm to employees.In such instances,it may not be regardless of where that person is located.In this regard,an possible to consult with In-House Counsel.Any such payments "export'of technical data can occur during meetings,telephone must be accurately reported to In-House Counsel immediately to conversations and facilities inspections and by memoranda, ensure accurate books and records.Any exceptions letters,faxes,email and other written materials. to this policy must be pre-approved by the Office of Ethics 8 Compliance in writing 26 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 102 Code of Conduct.October 2014 11 Other examples of items controlled by host country laws that countries and then nationals.We must take care that nothing may require an export license or a re-importation license include: we do or say could be seen as participating in an illegal boycott For example,we may not certify that an entity is not -Computer software containing certain encryption or blacklisted,or provide information on a company's activities with performance standards. a boycotted entity. -Military products,technology or know-how. -Any materials considered classified for purposes of national Our company must report any boycott requests to the U.S security by the United States or other government. government Therefore,if you believe you have received a boycott request or have any questions about boycott activities,it If your job involves any of the following responsibilities,you is crucial that you notify In-House Counsel. have an obligation to ensure that you are aware of and comply with the laws that pertain to our international trading activityDoing Business with the Government When AEC OM works with government customers,we are able -Accepting or processing client contracts and orders. to act as agents of change around the world.However,if we -Authorizing or processing the international movement of are involved in either securing or carrying out a government goods or technology. contract.our success depends on our compliance with -The performance of defense services. additional laws and regulations. -Any other activity that affects AECOM's compliance with export control laws. The laws and rules we must follow when we work with our government customers are considerably stricter than those that If you have any questions regarding export controls,you should apply to our commercial contracts.It is imperative that those seek guidance from the Ethics and Compliance Office. of us involved in this area of AECOM's business are familiar with and comply with all applicable laws,rules,regulations International Sanctions and procedures for government contracting.While various Many countries where we conduct business sometimes impose jurisdictions around the world have many detailed rules for sanctions,or adhere to sanctions imposed by multi-national working with government entities,these standards are always organizations such as the United Nations or the European applicable at AECOM: Union,that restrict or prohibit dealings with certain countries or individuals.Because AECOM is a U S corporation,we must all -Never misstate,mischaracterize or omit any material adhere to the economic sanctions administered by the Office information in connection with any communication with of Foreign Assets Control(OFAC),which include,but are not the government limited to,restrictions on financial transactions,travel,and -Take great care in preparing and maintaining records for and imports and exports.We also adhere to those imposed by other allocating costs to government contracts. countries and multi-lateral institutions such as the European -Be particularly mindful of laws,regulations and client rules Union or World Bank Make sure you understand the most up- governing gifts and entertainment given or offered to to-date regulations if you handle international business- government employees. International sanctions may also apply to activities such as The overarching principle to keep in mind when working on providing services and exporting sensitive technology Because government contracts,as with all contracts,is to act with each sanctions program is based on different foreign policy honesty and integrity.It is also critically important to protect any and national security obiectives,the prohibitions vary between government-classified information we acquire in connection programs.Please check with In-House Counsel or Ethics and with our work.We must limit this information to coworkers who Compliance regarding such requirements. hold the appropriate government clearance and have a business need to know the information.If you have questions or Boycott Requests concerns about the laws and rules that govern our interactions Due to our global operations,we must also be alert for illegal with government customers,contact In-House Counsel. boycott requests U.S.law prohibits us from cooperating with unsanctioned boycotts,regardless of where we are located. This applies to boycotted companies as well as boycotted BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 27 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 103 Code of-Conduct,October 2014 12 In addition,many locations where AECOM conducts business The only exception to this policy,whether in the U.S.or have strict rules about hiring—or attempting to hire or otherwise,is if In-House Counsel has advised you in writing discussing the hiring of—employees of government agencies. (which may be via email)that the proposed gift and gratuity Even if permitted by law or regulation,making an offer to is permitted under applicable local laws,rules or regulations. any official of or advisor for a government agency with which In-House Counsel can also help you determine if gifts and AECOM is doing business can raise ethical or regulatory entertainment for commercial clients is appropriate.Please issues.To ensure that we do not breach these rules,we may contact In-House Counsel for guidance in your region. not discuss hiring public sector employees unless we have the written approval of In-House Counsel in advance. Q Deepak is working closely with a government Gifts and Entertainment for Government Officials employee,Elba,on a contract.Next week,he'll be Additionally,the rules surrounding gifts and entertainment are traveling to Elba's offices so that she can update much stricter for our government clients.regulators and other him on the project and discuss next steps Deepak officials than for our commercial partners.Some countries such also knows that AECOM has submitted a bid for as Kuwait,prohibit government officials from accepting any another project and Elba is one of the officials gifts or meals.Others set limits on the amount and frequency. evaluating the bid.Deepak would like to take Elba to Commercial companies are also setting limits on what their lunch while he is visiting as a business courtesy Is employees can accept.Be sure that you are aware of and it okay to take her out to lunch? comply with those standards. A:The rules governing the types of gifts and entertainment we can offer government employees For example,the U.S.federal government has particularly are much stricter than those governing our restrictive rules and regulations for what meals,entertainment, interactions with commercial contacts. Since Elba gifts and other business courtesies their employees may is involved in evaluating a bid from AECOM,taking accept State and local governments and agencies have similar her to lunch could raise questions under the U.K. prohibitions.AECOM's policy is that those of us who work in Bribery Act and may violate local laws.Deepak must the U.S.or otherwise perform work for U.S.public sector clients check with In-House Counsel to evaluate whether may not: this is permissible or wise. –Offer or exchange gifts,gratuities or favors with public sector employees. –Pay for any meals,entertainment,travel or other expenses for public sector employees. –Provide any other items or services of value outside what is required under the contract with the client. Collectively,the items in the above list are known as"gifts and gratuities." 28 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 104 Code of Conduct,Oclher 2014 13 Our Shareholders, Business Partners and Customers Rely on Our Excellence Providing Quality Products and Services Charging Time The foundation of AECOM's reputation is the high quality of the Each of us has a responsibility to ensure that our weekly time products and services we provide.In order to keep our standards reports accurately reflect the hours worked on a specific work high,we must each comply with all quality control procedures and order or project.Time worked on a project must be charged follow contract specifications at all times.Make sure to familiarize to that project and no other.Government regulations and yourself with the standards and specifications that apply to the many clients'contracts also mandate complete and accurate projects you work on.We must each be aware of and follow these records.All employees are required to complete time sheets company policies and procedures designed to protect the quality in accordance with the requirements established by Company and safety of our products.For guidance,consult Management, policies.Supervisors are responsible for insuring that the Human Resources or In-House Counsel.Raise any quality or timesheets they approve are accurate and reflect the hours safety issues you spot with your supervisor immediately, worked by the employees who report to them. We further guarantee quality services to our customers through Mischarging time is a serious offense which can subject AECOM proper supply chain due diligence,monitoring and enforcement. and the responsible individual to criminal and civil liability.If AECOM takes great care in choosing our suppliers,contractors, anyone directs or suggests that time be charged in a manner agents,consultants and other business partners.We aim to do other than in accordance with this policy,it is the responsibility of business only with companies that match our high standards the employee to inform In-House Counsel immediately. of ethical business conduct.Ultimately,our goal is for all of our business partners to comply with our Code and operate in an Q.Right now I don't have any client work to do,but am ethical and lawful manner concerned that my job may be at risk if I charge too much time to overhead Is it okay to put time down For these reasons,we conduct due diligence when selecting our on a fixed price contract,since it won't hurt the suppliers and other business partners.We firmly hold our suppliers accountable for assuring the quality of the goods and services they customer? provide us.If you have reason to believe that a supplier has failed A: No.In all situations,regardless of anything else, to provide quality products and/or services,contact Management, time must be charged accurately. Human Resources or In-House Counsel immediately. Licensing We are responsible for maintaining appropriate licenses.Our Company is committed to providing professional services only in jurisdictions where we are licensed to do so.unless otherwise exempted by applicable law.We must inform In- House Counsel in a timely manner if there is any change to the status of our individual licensing,including circumstances where we are qualifiers on our corporate licenses.Furthermore,we will represent our credentials in a forthright way. Q We have been asked to submit a proposal for a project in a jurisdiction where AECOM has never worked before How do I know if we are licensed in a particular jurisdiction? A: Check with In-House Counsel or the Corporate Secretary.They maintain the licenses and registrations. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 29 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 105 Code of Conduct,October 2014 14 Accurate Books and Records Make sure you know and follow the records management We must each do our part to make certain that the financial policies and retention schedules that apply to your work and documents our company discloses to the public are accurate your location.These documents will tell you how long you should and honest Even if maintaining financial data is not your primary maintain business records,and procedures for compliance with job duty,each of us contributes to record keeping in some legal holds.(A legal hold applies to records connected with form,such as by completing timecards,submitting travel and actual or anticipated litigation.)If you believe that anyone has expense reports or keeping safety records The information improperly concealed,altered or destroyed a record,you should we record gives our outside stakeholders an accurate view of report it to In-House Counsel.For more information,please refer our operations and allows our company to make well-informed to our Electronic Communications Policy business decisions.Therefore,every piece of information that we submit in company records of any kind must be absolutely Audits and Investigations honest,accurate and complete-Each of us is responsible for During your employment,company or government official knowing and following AECOMs internal controls and any may ask you to take part in an audit or investigation of AECOM applicable accounting requirements when recording this data.We or certain employees.It is important to cooperate with such also must submit appropriate contract documentation at all times. a request,but if a government official requests information or documentation,contact In-House Counsel before providing Our commitment to ethical business conduct requires our any records.As with all our activities,we must be forthright business transactions to be authorized and legitimate.To be when we deal with audits or investigations At no time may we clear.we may not engage in any of the following activities: conceal,alter or destroy any requested records.In addition,we must never attempt to exert improper influence on the results of -Making false representations on behalf of our company, an investigation or audit. either verbally or in writing -Hiding company funds. 0.Alberto is a financial controller who learns -Mischaracterizing company transactions. that his AECOM business unit is going to be -Creating undisclosed or unrecorded fund accounts reviewed by Audit Services for the first time -Knowingly allowing similar illegal activities to occur since it was acquired a year ago He becomes upset and defensive when the audit team reviews If you notice any accounting or auditing irregularities,or expense report reimbursements and petty cash incidents of fraud by individuals responsible for our company's accounting or financial reporting,you should report your processes and asks him questions about some observation to Management,Human Resources or In-House of the payments. He tells his supervisor that the Counsel.Please keep in mind that you will be protected from auditors are not treating him with respect and do any retaliation that results from a good faith report. not understand the local culture by questioning his work How should his supervisor respond? Record Retention A:Alberto needs to appreciate that audit is one of the Keeping our records in order helps us to build trust with our key means by which AECOM meets its responsibilities clients,regulators and shareholders-This commitment applies to its shareholders,management and employees as a to both paper and electronic documents,including files such public company. The company relies on accurate and as emad and images.In short,we must take care with all the complete records as the basis of our financial system records we create,receive or maintain in order to do our jobs. and in order to access capital markets.All of us have Effectively managing these records allows us to ensure they are a duty to cooperate fully and corn ptetety with audits available when needed.In addition,it helps us comply with all applicable laws and regulations and preserve any documents and investigations and integrate any lessons learned that may become relevant in audits,investigations or litigation as a result into our work. 30 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 106 Code of Conduct,October 2014 15 Financial Integrity Additional Expectations Certain company officers and the directors of AECOM have a Protecting Inside Information special responsibility to promote integrity within our company. In our work for AECOM,we sometimes have access to information Their role requires them to ensure that our company's public about our company and our business partners that is not disclosures are accurate and complete In order to do so,these available to the general public.In order to avoid unfair and illegal individuals are required to know and understand the financial transactions,we must never buy or sell the stock of any company disclosure laws that apply to their work. (including AECOM)about which we possess inside information. Violations of financial disclosure laws will be viewed as a severe For information to be considered"inside:it must be both offense that may result in disciplinary action,up to and including material(meaning that it would affect the decisions of a termination.This includes fading to report potential violations reasonable investor)and non-public(meaning that it has not by others If you believe that a violation has occurred,contact , been released to the public).Information becomes public only Management,Human Resources or In-House Counsel.If you after two full trading days have passed since the public release prefer to report on an anonymous basis,where allowed by law, of the information Inside information can be either positive or you may submit a report by calling the AECOM hotline Keep negative,and commonly includes the following examples. in mind,however,that it is against company policy to retaliate against anyone who makes a good faith report of violations. -Projections of future earnings or losses. -News of a pending or proposed merger. -News of a significant sale of assets. -Declaration of a stock split or offering of additional securities. -Changes in executive management. -Significant new products or discoveries. If you have any questions as to whether the information you possess qualifies as inside information,please consult our Insider Trading Policy or contact In-House Counsel. Preventing Money Laundering AECOM is committed to helping in the global fight against money laundering."Money laundering"is the process by which a person or group tries to conceal illegal funds or attempts to make the sources of their illicit funds look legitimate.In order to keep AECOM from becoming inadvertently involved in this type of misconduct,we should always perform due diligence on customers,suppliers,intermediaries and other business partners who wish to conduct business with our company Look out for red Hags"that may signal money laundering activities. For example,make sure that the party with whom you are conducting business maintains a physical presence,is engaged in legitimate business and has proper compliance processes in place If you need more information about how to identify money laundering,you should consult In-House Counsel BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 31 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 107 Code of Coruhua.()Oar,7(111 Id Our Communities Rely on Our Integrity & Innovation Environmental Sustainability As good corporate citizens,we comply with all environmental laws,rules and regulations in effect wherever we conduct business.We strive to be a leader in environmental stewardship,and look to exceed these rules whenever possible.To this end,we constantly strive to maximize the efficient use of natural resources in our workplaces and reduce our environmental footprint.We also account for these considerations when we design our business products and processes.You are encouraged to submit your suggestions and ideas on bringing our practices closer to these goals to Management,Human Resources or In-House Counsel. Political and Charitable Contributions Although AECOM encourages us to participate in political and charitable activities,this must always be on our own time and at our own expense.We must never attribute our personal activities(such as campaign work,fundraising or speech making)to AECOM.Similarly,we may never use AECOM resources(such as funds,facilities or supplies)in connection with our personal political or charitable activities,and should never expect AECOM to reimburse us for any political contributions or other expenses.We should be prepared to report any political contributions if required to do so in accordance with applicable law. Responding to Media Inquiries Providing our communities with an accurate picture of our operations,transactions and intentions helps us to preserve AECOM's integrity.In order to do this,we need to make sure that our company speaks with one consistent voice.Therefore,only those who have been designated to communicate on AECOM's behalf should make public statements about our company.For example,if a member of the media contacts you for any reason, you should refer the request to Corporate Communications. Similarly,requests for financial and legal information must always be directed to the appropriate channel.If an investor,security analyst or other key public contact contacts you to request information,even if the request is informal,please refer them to Corporate Communications.Inquiries from government officials or attorneys should be referred to In-House Counsel.For more information,please see our External Communications Policy 32 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 108 Code of Conduct,Odober 2014 17 It's Up to You AECOM's reputation and success as a good corporate citizen of the world depend upon each of us meeting our obligations under this Code.If you have any questions or do not understand what is expected of you,it is your duty to raise your concern with your Manager,Human Resources,In-House Counsel or Ethics and Compliance. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 33 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 109 About AECOM AECOM is a global provider of professional technical and management support services to a broad range of markets,including transportation, facilities,envronmental,energy,water and government. With approximately 100,000 employees around the world, AECOM is a leader in all of the key markets that it serves. AECOM provides a blend of global reach,local knowledge, innovation and technical excellence in delivering solutions that create,enhance and sustain the world's built,natural and social environments. A Fortune 500 company,AECOM serves clients in more than 130 countries and has annual revenue in excess of$8.0 billion. More information on AECOM and its services can be found at www aecom.com AECOM 555 South Flower Street Suite 3700 Los Angeles California 90071-2300 T 213.593.8000 E infoigaecom.com www.aecom.com 34 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 110 Exceptions to RFQ Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ,and outline what. if any,alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be included and clearly delineated,in writing,in the Proposal. The City,at its sole and absolute discretion,may accept or reject any or all exceptions and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are rejected,the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to(as said term and/ or condition was originally set forth on the RFQ). AECOM Technical Services,Inc.("AECOM")has reviewed the RFQ and the attached Appendix D-Special Conditions and has identified the following specific terms that AECOM will want to negotiate prior to signing a contract with the City.AECOM believes it has captured the most significant issues:however,final review and negotiations of a mutually acceptable Agreement may identify other terms that require modification to properly interface with the terms negotiated below,or otherwise. 1. Request Amendment to Paragraph 5,Indemnification.Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents,and instrumentalities from any and all liability,losses,or damages,including attorneys'fees and costs of defense,which the City or its officers,employees,agents,and instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims,demands,suits,causes of actions or proceedings e.fl an'!kind or naturearising out of, the performance of this Agreement by the Provider or its employees,agents, servants,partners principals or subcontractors,to the extent proximately caused by the Contractor's negligence. Provider shall pay all claims and losses in comection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims,suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable,including appellate proceedings,and shall pay all costs,judgments,and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. 2. Request Amendment to Paragraph 13.This RFQ,and any future mutually acceptable Agreement negotiated by the parties' ,will contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract.By virtue of submitting a proposal,consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time sercies are requested,eitehr through a separate agreement,work order,letter of engagement or purchase order. 3. Other Requested Additional Provisions: a. Request the inclusion of a clearly defined standard of care at the end of the article similar to the following:Provider will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of same profession performing the same or similar services under similar conditions in similar localities. No other warranties,express or implied,are made or intended.- b. ntended-b. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WAIVER: IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY,THEIR PARENTS. AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES OR THEIR RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER FOR ANY INDIRECT,INCIDENTAL,SPECIAL,CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES WHATSOEVER(INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,LOST PROFITS,LOSS OF REVENUE. LOSS OF USE OR INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS)ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES c. Any reuse of Provider's prepared documents,except for the specific purpose intended hereunder,will be at the City's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to Provider or its subcontractors. AECOM shall be responsible for its performance and that of AECOM's lower-tier subcontractors and vendors. However.AECOM shall not be responsible for health or safety programs or precautions related to Client's activities or operations or those of Cllenfs other contractors and consultants or their respective subcontractors and vendors("Contractors"). AECOM shall have no responsibility for(i)construction means, methods,techniques,sequences or procedures:(ii)for the direction of Contractors'personnel:(iii)selection of construction equipment: (iv)coordination of Contractors' work (v) for placing into operation any plant or equipment:or(vi)for Contractors'failure to perform the work in accordance with any applicable construction contract.AECOM shall not be responsible for Client's pre-existing site conditions or the aggravation of those preexisting site conditions to the extent not caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of AECOM. AECOM shall not be responsible for inspecting,observing reporting or correcting health or safety conditions or deficiencies of Client Contractors or others at the project site (`Project Site") other than AECOM's employees, subconsultants and vendors. So as not to discourage AECOM from voluntarily addressing health or safety issues while at the Project Site,in the event AECOM does identify such issues by making observations,reports,suggestions or otherwise,AECOM shall have no authority to direct the actions of others not under AECOM's responsibility and control and shall have no liability, responsibility,or affirmative duty arising on account of AECOM's actions or forbearance. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY O F MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 35 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 111 1 .3 Minimum Qualifications Requirements In compliance with the Minimum Qualifications Requirements stated in C.1 of the RFP,below are qualifying projects displaying AECOM's experience in providing consulting services in the areas of sustainability,resiliency,adaptation strategies,or risk management/mitigation to public agencies. ADAPTATION RISK SUSTAINABILITY RESILIENCE STRATEGIES MANAGEMENT/ MITIGATION Flood Mitigation and Resilience •Program,Miami Beach,FL V Flood Resilience Program, San Francisco Public Utilities f Commission,San Francisco,CA Climate Adaptation and Coastal Resiliency Plan,Port of Long Beach CA Silicon Valley 2.0,Santa Clara County,CA • Sustainable Infrastructure / i Guidelines,Los Angeles County,CA / y 100 Resilient Cities:Greater Miami • and the Beaches.FL 36 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 112 FLOOD MITIGATION AND RESILIENCE PROGRAM MIAMI BEACH,FL. Description AECOM has provided Flood Mitigation and Resilience Planning services,working closely with the City Engineer,the Chief Resilience Officer,and the Director of Environment and Sustainability.Our work is focused on planning and implementation of climate adaptation and resilience strategies,development of feasible alternatives to address flooding issues and provide resilience in the face of rising sea levels,and the analysis and development of stormwater infrastructure. Start/Completion Dates 2014-present Project Contact Susanne Torriente,Chief Resilience Officer/Assistant City Manager 305-673-7000 x6486 susannetorriente@miamibeachfl.gov Bruce Mowry,PhD,PE,City Engineer T 305-673-7080 x6565 E bruce.mowry@miamibeachfl.gov Contract Volume $6M of$7.5M contract Firm Role Prime's Role • Update of the Stormwater Master Plan • Stormwater modeling to inform identification of necessary infrastructure • Identification of structural and non-structural options to provide cost savings or easier implementation • Analysis and revision of building and zoning codes to facilitate consistent application of resilience strategies • Vulnerability Assessment of City-owned built assets • Development of tools to build resilience into City operations and practices FLOOD RESILIENCE PROGRAM,SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO,CA Description The objective of this program is to provide a transparent framework for evaluating the benefits of new capital projects to address urban flooding,the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission(SFPUC)selected AECOM to perform an innovative benefit-cost analysis leading to recommendations for capital planning.The analysis provides a robust,quantitative benefit-cost comparison between various packages of flood protection infrastructure in the City of San Francisco. Start/Completion Dates 08/2015-06/2016 Project Contact Stefani Harrison 415-551-4820 soharrison@sfwate r.org Contract Volume $850,000(Total task order is ongoing;$1.1M+to date.) Firm Role Prime BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 37 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 113 PORT OF LONG BEACH CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND COASTAL RESILIENCY PLAN i1N, i Cq Description AECOM assisted the Port of Long Beach(Port)in developing a Climate Adaptation and Coastal Resiliency Plan(CRP)to manage the direct and indirect risks associated with climate change and coastal hazards.The CRP provides a framework for the Port to incorporate adaptive measures related to projected climate change into its policymaking and planning processes,construction practices,infrastructure design, and environmental documents. StartJCompletion Dates 08/2012-06/2016 ProjectContact Justin Luedy 562-283-7100 justin.luedy@polb.com Contract Volume $507,946 Firm Role Prime SILICON VALLEY 2.0 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CA Description AECOM assisted the County in securing grant funding for the project from the California Strategic Growth Council.The project engaged stakeholders to create strategies,tools,and networks that enhance local capacity to respond to these challenges and help maintain the region's competitiveness and quality of life.The climate mitigation component of the project began with a collaborative approach to leverage opportunities for efficiencies,given the leg work on the various stages of climate action planning that had already been completed by cities in the County.The effort resulted in the development of individualized Climate Action Plans(CAPs)for multiple cities, StartICompletion Dates 01/2012-06/2015 Project Contact Kevin Armstrong.Interim Director(previous client contact,Demetra McBride,has left the County) 408-299-5105 kevin.armstrong®ceo.sccgov.org Contract Volume $1,432,311 Firm Role Prime 38 AECC M RFQ-2017-300-10 Page 114 SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE GUIDELINES LOS ANGFI FS_ (ILIMY Description AECOM has developed Sustainable Infrastructure Guidelines(SIG)and small building (less than 10,000 SF)guidelines for the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works.A SIG tool with an embedded User Guide has been developed in conjunction with the guidelines document to supplement the planning,design and implementation process. Start/Completion Dates 09/2015-ongoing Project Contact Randall Davis 626-458-7981 radavis©dpw.lacounty.gov Contract Volume $495,000 Firm Role Prime 100 RESILIENT CITIES:GREATER MIAMI AND THE BEACHES MIAMI,FI Description AECOM is the Strategy Partner to the Rockefeller Foundation 100 Resilient Cities for Greater Miami and the Beaches(GM&B,includes Miami-Dade County and the Cities of Miami and Miami Beach).100 Resilient Cities is a$100M effort launched by the Rockefeller Foundation for its centennial celebration in 2013.It was created to help cities build resilience to the social,economic,and physical challenges that are an increasing part of the 21st century.In supporting the effort,AECOM assists communities prioritize strategies,narrative content,and develop final strategies.Of the 100 worldwide cities,AECOM is Strategy Partner for 30 of the 100 cities. Our experience listening and helping build a more resilient region has provided insight into the top resilience shocks and stresses the region is facing,including vulnerability to storms and the ability to recover,sea level rise and coastal erosion, aging infrastructure,strained natural systems,an economy that is strong yet lacks diversification,and overall greater opportunity for intergovernmental collaboration. To adapt to sea level rise,flooding,and storm surge,four priorities were identified during the Preliminary Resilience Assessment:committing innovative investments in infrastructure:protecting natural resources:water quality and supply:understanding and communicating risk;and understanding the potential changes in insurance rates. We are prepared to apply the knowledge gained as Strategy Partner for GM&B to the business case analysis for Miami Beach and,as needed,to GM&B partners. Start/Completion Dates 09/2016-09/2018(estimated) Project Contact Eric Wilson 646-612-7203 ewilso n©1 OOresilientc ities.org Contract Volume $300,000 Firm Role Prime BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY O F MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 39 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 115 40 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 116 Section 2 Experience & Qualifications m rn CD n CD 0 C n co RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 117 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 118 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm ir- ri Ir i :;r7 •�i1Fr1 /' ire YY i1 fellelia0 7" ss .M y .- . - E. ... �_.._as�.. 011t .""-• Iiiir.. 4 ........ . .. ,. . . .41 _ ». ,., . 44. 4 . 4, 4. _,.., Y._.+ . .. r-4 ♦w. -.4410111114, ABOUT AECOM AECOM is a global professional services corporation Feliz Ventura and providing Integrated design,planning,engineering. Aaron McGregor environment and program management services to a broad worked with the range of markets.Formed from some of the world's leading consultancies,we are configured to address the complex Port of Long Beach challenges facing our clients as they embark on projects to help them involving land,community or infrastructure Our purpose is to create,enhance and sustain the world's built,natural and understand the risks social environments. to Port lands,assets and operations We blend global knowledge,local experience,technical excellence,innovation and creativity to offer our clients through their work unparalleled possibilities.Our project teams can address on the Port's Climate every layer of a site and every phase of its development through a collaborative,systemic approach.Our work Resilience Strategy. bridges grey infrastructure and green infrastructure,land and buildings,economy and ecology,society and nature. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 41 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 119 OUR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMICS PRACTICE The AECOM Sustainable Economics team brings Outlook:Our practice"bakes unparalleled experience in economic consulting on in"to our work considerations issues at the forefront of climate adaptation strategy implementation.We perform analyses that inform around people, the environment, successful strategies that generate value for groups that and resilience, in a way that other range from institutions to communities,and ecosystems. economics + lannin firms do not. Our services are designed to help our clients understand p g how to approach,understand and maximize the returns to investments that benefit society and the environments that Skills:Our team has experience support it.We work with governments,private corporations and public sector clients on infrastructure and resilience working with master planners,and topics:we understand the challenges in these fields from various types of engineers and many perspectives. modelers from other technical Expertise.Our practice supports clients doing cutting- disciplines. edge work seeking to improve economic,environmental, and social outcomes Informed by the most current scientific and technical data,for areas ranging from local Outcomes:This combination communities to countries.We assess feasibility,develop of outlook and skills allows us to Implementation strategies and support broad-based returns from investment for policies,plans,and projects produce industry-leading analyses around the world. that lead to major projects and People.Our team for this assignment is headed by leaders inform long-term investment of our Economics practice,Feliz Ventura and Aaron strategies. McGregor,with a proven track record of success with similar clients and projects.They will be supported with additional Economics team members and other advisors with related experience.strong research backgrounds,and keen analytical skills. In addition to our expertise,experience and skills,we are accessible to our clients and mission driven in supporting your efforts to shape a sustainable,equitable future. Quality and Impact.We produce high quality,credible studies that are used by our clients to make investment decisions that will impact cities,regions and countries over the course of the next century.These studies are used for internal decision-making as well as stakeholder engagement,ranging from policymakers,the general public, and industry experts. Multi-Disciplined Service Offering.In addition to our economics expertise,if appropriate,AECOM can provide a wide array of technical services to projects.Our range of services is broad,and we would be pleased to leverage experts from across the company to support our projects. Visit htto//www aecom com/services/for an overview of services available. 47 AE:OM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 120 , ,, t or. : 1► s' t .,i l'' r ' . ,. , ,,, , r ,..,,.., 4,,} , , . ... i , . .. , . _ \ _ „ ,,,,. _ ., , ,,, , . . . ., ... . , , „ , _ „. . , ‘' t iii , • r I .,,te '41. RMS Climate Change Expertise.RMS employs several Partnering with AECOM on the Business Case Analysis, climatologists who have academic experience in the field RMS is a leading provider of data.models and software of climate change science.This experience has been that help financial institutions.their corporate clients as leveragedover the past few years on several consulting well as government agencies to assess and manage their projects,including the quantification of the cost of sea level exposure to extreme events across the globe.As the largest rise to San Francisco,and how climate change will alter the catastrophe risk modeling company.RMS is proud to frequency of extreme drought events.More details on these count amongst its clients almost all of the top re/insurance projects,and others,is given in the Appendix section of this companies and insurance linked securities(ILS)funds document.Given that the City of Miami Beach's resiliency globally.RMS provides a wide range of probabilistic risk efforts are focused on assessing risk into the future,it is models to its client base,including accumulation and loss important that climate change is considered in the study. models for many geologic and climate hazards,as well as for terrorism and cyber risk.RMS also serves the global life and Experience Converting Science to Actionable Financial health financial services sector with medical models for the Measures.To ensure that results of its science-based risk changing patterns of life expectancy,as well as the health analyses are actionable,RMS delivers its modeled outputs and economic impacts of infectious diseases. through enterprise application software.This includes a financial model that makes it possible for the user of the RMS emerged from Stanford University in 1989,initially information to input all the relevant details of the business in modeling seismic risk in the California area.The company question,including the structures of any financial protection is still led by the founding CEO,and retains its academic in place,to produce a complete perspective of the overall identity,with 95%of the model development team holding financial impact.RMS'experience in converting the advanced degrees,most to PhD.The company has grown scientific understanding of the hazard and the vulnerability to become a multinational business,with 11 offices across into quantifiable losses will be applied for this study to the Americas,Europe and Asia,and headquarters in Silicon determine the cost benefit of employing various resiliency Valley.California. measures. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 43 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 121 Capabilities Economic Analysis.AECOM has deep experience in AECOM knows that risk can generally not be eliminated, economic analyses that utilized by public,private.and but that it can be managed according to an acceptable non-profit sector clients to make Investment decisions standard or desired level.Core to the success of this that create vibrant,resilient communities.Our Sustainable project will be articulating the key questions needed for Economics team has provided a range of services in understanding risk that is most relevant to the City and communities of all sizes around the world including real developing products and tools that are accessible and estate market and feasibility analysis,economic and useful to decision-makers in the City as well as other local. fiscal impact analysis,development programming and state and federal stakeholders who may be potential project strategies,reinvestment strategies,strategic planning, partners in reducing risk.AECOM strives to turn knowledge triple bottom line(TBL)modeling,sustainable return into action by accounting for local perspectives at each on investment analyses,revitalization and economic step of the study,and using the best available science to development strategies,masterplan development support evaluate risk types from a comprehensive risk management analysis,ecosystem services,capital investment strategies, framework that maps onto and bolsters existing risk socioeconomic analysis and social equity strategies. reduction strategies. Cost Benefit Analysis.For this project,key members from Insurance.Financial Impact,and Flood Risk.AECOM AECOM's Sustainable Economics team will lead cost- has been studying climate change and sea level rise benefit analysis for this project.This team brings extensive impacts around the country and is collaborating with experience in economic consulting on issues at the federal agencies and state and local governments to forefront of climate adaptation strategy and implementation determine impact extent.Following the devastation in in coastal environments.Our services are designed to help New York City from Hurricane Sandy,AECOM has been our clients understand how to approach,understand and assisting in rebuilding efforts by providing revised flood maximize the returns to investments that benefit society maps of the region,input on building codes and standards, and the environments that support It.Our team is led by development of design and adaptation strategies,and Feliz Ventura who has led business case investments analysis of planning alternatives and o ptions.AECO M relating to flooding and sea level rise for public and private recently completed a study for FEMA entitled"The Impact clients across the United States.Aaron McGregor is a key of Climate Change and Population Growth on the National team member and brings nearly a decade of experience Flood Insurance Program Through 2100"RMS is a leader relating to the evaluation of the economic consequences of in building flood models to capture flood risk and inform sea level rise to communities and the environment,and has financial impact assessments.Our team will utilize this worked on similar tasks to those outlined in this project in knowledge for analysis of potential impacts to Miami multiple locations. Beach's property tax base,flood insurance costs,real estate market,mortgage cycles,and credit ratings. Risk Modeling and Management.Accurately modeling the potential economic consequences of natural hazards, Integrated Delivery.Our economics practice will be as well as the costs and benefits of adaptation,is inherently supported by a diverse team of water experts ranging from difficult.When evaluating impacts to people,property. stormwater engineers,modelers,geologists,and coastal infrastructure and the environment from flooding and SLR. engineers with direct experience evaluating Miami Beach's uncertainty is present in any methodology that is used infrastructure.This team will bring tools and experience because of incomplete knowledge of current and future developing alternatives for infrastructure decision-making. conditions. Local and national resources with knowledge of the local AECOM's team of integrated hydrologists,engineers, environment will be called upon to respond quickly and economists and planners have extensive experience in effectively to support all project requirements. accounting for uncertainty in each of the key factors that make economic loss estimation results sensitive to error. This experience draws on knowledge from real-world applications of structuring and testing data and modeling applications to inform multi-billion dollar storm water infrastructure investments.This includes probabilistic flood risk assessments that address uncertainty and randomness through a careful examination of hydrology,hydraulics. geotechnical performance of flood protection barriers,and structure-specific parameters(e.g.,foundation height of a building,$value of contents). 44 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 122 We know Miami Beach Our work on the Climate Resiliency and '/' Flood Mitigation Plan • Since 2014.AECOM has provided Flood Mitigation and s Resilience Planning services,working closely with the City . Engineer,the Chief Resilience Officer,and the Director of 74r` 1:3113 Environment and Sustainability. N f rel j .. : . .., Broad experience in Miami Beach Transportation&Traffic Planning.For over a decade, AECOM has completed comprehensive traffic engineering studies and roadway improvements in multiple locations across Miami Beach.The objective of these efforts has been to enhance motorist safety and traffic flow. Some example locations:Studies performed Include ' ~T j`f f;''"'f• L�.Ir�s.��8 the Convention Center Hotel Traffic Impact Study,Rue rw Vendome Street Closure Traffic Analysis,71st Street& Enhancing Resiliency: Dickens Avenue Safety and Operational Analysis:Ongoing Sea Level Rise r!'R'' Studies include Intersection Improvement Study for the Adaptation Strategies Intersection of Alton Road&17th Street,Corridor Traffic I'aFaeed Cods Naincatx,r s Study along 41st Street at Indian Creek Drive&Collisions Auevwx ewe Mboaa Pere!a, $ _ Avenue,Intersection Capacity Analyses along Indian Creek ��Lem Rtee — ` Drive at 63rd Street&Abbott Avenue,and Intersection Improvement Study at the intersection of Alton Road& Chase Avenue /LYgM wmnamI RIS'NGla ABOVE Utility Pipeline.AECOM has provided design criteria, value engineering,and construction management services Utility Relocation.AECOM performed complex projects for implementation of the redundant 54-inch Force Main that involved connections on four land masses separated in the South Point and Flamingo neighborhood of Miami by federally protected for the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Beach.The project originally conceived as a 5700 LF Department for the Government Cut and Norris Cut Utilities microtunnel project was subsequently re-engineered to Relocation design-build projects.The effort included a 54-Inch Horizontal Directional Drill utilizing HDPE.The a 54-inch force main that extended from Miami Beach use of resilient,inert,non-corrosive materials was key to Fisher Island,and a 20-inch water main between Port performance criteria to ensure a service life of at least of Miami and Fisher Island to replace critical utilities that 80 years.Other resilient features were incorporated into were in direct conflict with the USACE Dredging Program. the project including raising the grade of the street by The work included master planning,alignment analyses, approximately 1 ft.to circumvent impacts of sea level rise. modeling,risk assessments.geotechnical,topographic, improvements to the stormwater system,and streetscaping environmental resource evaluations,permitting, improvements that promoted more pedestrian movement. assessments of adjacent underground structures,and The project is the recipient of the ASCE's 2017 Project of pipeline load and installation analyses. the Year Award,and was recently named by Benjamin Media as runner up Trenchless Project of the Year. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 45 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 123 City of Miami Beach Climate Resiliency and Flood Mitigation Plan Miami Beach, Florida Our work is focused on the planning and implementation AECOM has been working with the City of of climate adaptation and resilience strategies,and the Miami Beach building relationships with key development of feasible alternatives to address flooding issues and provide resilience in the face of rising sea levels. staff and developing tools to build resilience into City operations and practices. Critical to our work on the Resilience Program has been close interaction and relationship-building with numerous City departments and staff including the Summary Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Sea Level Rise(BRP),the City AECOM has brought environmental and earth scientists, Commission's Committee on Sustainability and Resilience planners,modelers,economists,and engineers to support (SRC).the City Engineer and Public Works,and the Chief the City of Miami Beach in its Climate Resiliency and Resilience Officer,Resilience Team and City Manager. Flood Mitigation Plan.Our team is currently addressing, in real time,sea level rise and resiliency for the City of Miami Beach.We are assisting the City with stormwater improvements,changes to building codes,codifying public Timeline works documents,assessment of vulnerability for city-wide February 2014-present assets,and development of tools which have assisted the City in its efforts to improve communication with its many Client Contact stakeholders. Susanne Torriente,Chief Resilience Officer/Assistant City Manager T 305-673-7000 x6486 E susannetorriente@maimbeachF gov Since 2014,AECOM has provided Flood Mitigation and Resilience Planning services,working closely with the City Bruce Mowry,PhD,PE,City Engineer Engineer,the Chief Resilience Officer,and the Director of E bruce. owry x6565 E bruce.mowry@miamibeachfl.gov Environment and Sustainability. 80 Unified Sea Level Rise Projection (Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact,2015) 70 iPCC ARS USACE High NOAA High vap Year Median (inches) (inches) YI (inches) v 2030 6 10 12 •Qy y0y 40 2060 14 26 34 > 3 I y n 2100 31 61 81 3 2 26" / c20 /'/ 0 14" ./ - m Z /" () 1992 20(X) 2010 2020 7030 2040 2050 PIN) 2070 20x0 2090 2100 Year 44 AECO M RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 124 Flood Resilience Benefit-Cost Analysis San Francisco, California 'GRAPH CONSIDER DEVELOP CONDUCT COST-BENEFIT POLICY PROJECTS TO To provide a transparent framework for ANALYSIS CURVES CHANGES IMPLEMENT evaluating the benefits of new capital 0 0 0 0 projects to address urban flooding,the Risk San Francisco Public Utilities Commission u«nM tom' (SFPUC)selected AECOM to perform an prolettCaw innovative benefit-cost analysis leading ,„ ,' ' ' to recommendations for capital planning. The analysis provides a robust,quantitative FLOOD RESILIENCE STUDY FUTURE Capital benefit-cost comparison between various a,Parallel,Ber ep Poogrammec.,,.OPmIieW Stralogias Iivestments flood protection strategies infrastructure in the City of San Francisco. The final part of the analysis involved determining the economic benefit provided by each flood protection package.This step estimated and combined residual San Francisco manages urban flooding through economic impacts,those not mitigated by infrastructure,in infrastructure designed to minimize flood impact.To five design storms over a 100-year timespan,and imputed understand the range of benefits provided by flood intervening storm impacts.The total benefit of a given flood infrastructure and align benefits with infrastructure costs, protection package is the avoided impact,or the difference SFPUC selected AECOM to develop and implement a between the baseline economic impact and the residual city-specific,risk-based approach to select and prioritize economic impact. flood-related capital program options. Benefit and Outcomes Project Scope SFPUC is using this study to inform policy discussions that Each flood protection package,composed of hundreds of drive future project prioritization.development,and individual infrastructure projects,was defined using a implementation,including: rigorous multi-step process that leveraged several different modeling tools.A hydrologic and hydraulic model was used » Prioritization of capital investments based onflood risk to determine the extent of surface flooding for each design storm,while GIS models identified potentially impacted » Level of Service(LOS)analysis and recommendation assets based on the extent of surface flooding. Evaluation of impacts to rates and ratepayer Data generated through this process were used as inputs to affordability determine the baseline economic impacts of flooding on 13 issue areas,which address impacts on people,property, Timeline and infrastructure from flooding. The AECOM team 08/2015-06/2016 developed customized models for issue areas such as damage to buildings,vehicles,population relocation, Client Contact emergency response,business impacts,traffic and transit, Stefani Harrison public services,and public health.The models employed T 415-551-4820 standard federal approaches tailored to local conditions E soharrison@sfwater.org with condition-specific replacement cost estimates,as well as interviews with experts to guide thresholds for damage and the likely extent of impacts.The project team also surveyed building stock in San Francisco to determine flood risk and establish local building typology. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 47 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 125 Port of Long Beach Climate Resiliency Strategy Long Beach, California The plan recommends near-term solutions for protecting the Port's most vulnerable areas 'LPart or ONG BEACH and long-term strategies that can assist the Port in maintaining business continuity across Port of Long Beach its infrastructure and operations into the next Climate Adaptation and century. Coastal Resiliency Plan(CRP) Fall Working with the Port of Long Beach(Port),AECOM developed a Climate Adaptation and Coastal Resiliency Plan (CRP)to manage the direct and indirect risks associated with climate change and coastal hazards.The CRP provides a framework for the Port to incorporate adaptive measures related to projected climate change into its policymaking and planning processes,construction practices, infrastructure design,and environmental documents.The Port is an important economic engine for Southern California and the nation,and is a critical gateway to global trade.The CRP recommends near-term solutions for protecting the Ports most vulnerable areas and long-term strategies that can assist the Port in maintaining business continuity across its infrastructure and operations into the next century.This plan addresses all of the requirements outlined in the California State Lands Commission Assembly Bill 691(2014). The CRP includes a review of the best available climate science,an inventory of Port assets,and detailed sea level and storm surge inundation mapping.Together,these data 41I , sets informed the development of vulnerability profiles for the Port's infrastructure,transportation networks,critical buildings.utilities,and breakwater.A broad suite of potential • adaptation strategies that focused on governance. d initiatives,and physical infrastructure,were developed to �•. "� reduce the Port's vulnerabilities.Taken together,this information is the basis of a cost of inaction analysis that t examines the financial impacts of sea level rise across Port ,.• assets and the costs of repair and/or adaptation to understand the anticipated benefits of implementing • adaptation measures for the Port and the State of California. 48 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 126 • Development • Climate Inundation of Adaptation Science Mapping strtegiCRP • Review g Port Workshop Inventory of •P ( ) aes(_)FInal Assts • • • Road map to the Port of Long Beach strategy. Project Goals Timeline • Manage risks associated with climate change 08/2012-06/2016 Client Contact • Identify Port assets that are most vulnerable Justin Luedy T 562-283-7100 • Identify potential adaptation strategies to protect the E justin.luedy@polb.com Po rt • Understand costs of inaction for sea level rise and benefits of adaptation strategies Project Benefits • A more resilient Port able to continue operations with reduced impact • A Port prepared and ready to adapt • More future-looking risk assessment process BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 49 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 127 Silicon Valley 2.0 Project Santa Clara County, California The project also had a climate adaptation component that Nine asset sectors of the County were the focused on the development of a regional climate change adaptation guide and an online decision-supporttool for focus of vulnerability and risk assessment. local jurisdictions in the County.In this component.AECOM Stakeholders were briefed on cascading carried out a detailed gap analysis of the climate resilience effects and invited to brainstorm action work carried out to date by the different cities and agencies plans. within Santa Clara County across nine asset sectors, including energy,water,waste,transportation,buildings and properties,communications,ecology,public health and The Silicon Valley 2.0 Project was a regional effort in Santa shoreline protection.This helped to establish a baseline Clara County to reduce the generation of local greenhouse understanding of the County's current climate resilience gas(GHG)emissions and minimize the anticipated and adaptive capacity. impacts of climate change.AECOM assisted the County In To carry outa County-wide vulnerability and risk successfully securing grant funding for the project from the assessment,AECOM(along with web coders Point Blue) California Strategic Growth Council.The project engaged developed an online tool that allows users to select stakeholders to create strategies,tools,and networks that geographical region,asset,and climate stressor of interest. enhance local capacity to respond to these challenges and The tool then calculates the vulnerability and economic risk help maintain the region's competitiveness and quality of of that asset.The economic risk component incorporated life. up to four different measurements of economic impact. Using this tool,AECOM completed a vulnerability and risk The climate mitigation component of the project began assessment of the nine asset sectors across the county. with a collaborative approach to leverage opportunities For the most vulnerable and at-risk assets.AECOM then for efficiencies,given the leg work on the various stages of developed a suite of strategies suitable for each sector climate action planning that had already been completed These strategies included policy recommendations, by cities in the County.The project resulted in development further data analysis and research,and physical strategies of individualized Climate Action Plans(CAPS)for multiple appropriate for different scales and shoreline typologies. cities.AECOM performed a detailed peer review analysis AECOM worked with a Technical Advisory Group made and revisions to the existing base year GHG inventories up of local agency and city representatives that met six for each city.Revisions were made to the on-road vehicle times over the course of the project.In addition,two and wastewater sectors to more accurately reflect current big partner meetings were held.One meeting at the industry standards in emissions analysis.AECOM also beginning introduced stakeholders to the project where a prepared emissions forecasts for 2020 and 2035,and cascading impacts exercise was carried out to establish consulted with the Bay Area Air Quality Management interdependencies and relationships between different District to define appropriate local GHG targets.The project assets and services affected by different climate stressors. team then performed a policy gap analysis for each city A participatory meeting was held at the end of the project, to identify opportunities for local GHG reductions,and to brainstorm action plans for specific strategies across the developed a shared set of reduction strategies for the cities nine asset sectors. to consider.AECOM prepared a CAP template,which was customized to outline a path toward target achievement specific to each city's emissions characteristics and Timeline intervention opportunities. Qt/20r206/2016 Client Contact Kevin Armstrong.Interim Director (previous contact Demetra McBride) T 408-299-5105 E kevin.armstrong@ceo.sccgov.org 50 Aero til RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 128 Los Angeles County Sustainable Infrastructure Guidelines (SIG) Los Angeles County,California The County of Los Angeles was able to 51157A MAB EiNEf ASi RUCTURf GUt kLINES understand the long term costs and benefits . . , of implementing sustainable infrastructure management practices using a bespoke tool — __..�...._.o.. populated with County-specific information --M1110- 0 and metrics. - ._.. Description of Services ,,,._ AECOM has developed Sustainable Infrastructure Guidelines(SIG)and small building(less than 10.000 SF) ••••••44••••••••4.01.11.101111* guidelines for the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works.The guidelines reference existing guiding documents and regulations.County and State codes, Envision and LEED. Complement,but do not duplicate,existing sustainability programs such as LEED,Envision and Seven infrastructure categories have been developed:. Sites » Integrative design Minimize long-term operating costs » Site . Consider cost/benefit relationships of all strategies to » Water ensure cost effectiveness * Minimize maintenance requirements » Energy » Materials A SIG tool with an embedded User Guide has been developed in conjunction with the guidelines document to * Climate impact mitigation and resilience supplement the planning,design and implementation process.The tool is intended to be used as a platform for » Construction preliminary analysis to determine the extent of the project's ability to meet its sustainability performance goals.Through » Operations and Maintenance its interface with ENVISION°Rating System and CALGreen°. the SIG tool generates a preliminary evaluation score for the The sustainable guidelines framework was developed project. through a series of intensive workshops with County staff to ensure that the action items are carefully vetted against key principles: Timeline 09/2015-ongoing +� a » Minimize impact on natural resources like energy and k 1 ClientContact water Randall Davis T 626-458-7981 » Target strategies that can be effectively implemented 1' i E radavis@dpw.lacounty.gov tl` - BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 51 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 129 Sea Level Rise Real Estate Strategy and Tool Development Project Scope AECOM was selected to develop a decision- To develop a tool that examines the return on investment of making tool analysis that defines the resilience investments in both sunny day and storm surge conditions,AECOM worked with the client to understand value of investing in climate adaptation who would use the tool,when it would be deployed, and resilience in a coastal context for new understand user needs and broader stakeholder concerns, and leverage existing information in the development of the development.This effort leveraged both the decision-making tool.The project began with a survey of AECOM Triple Bottom Line methodology the physical assets at risk,review of existing materials,and and benefit-cost analysis to produce an alignment of the most recent sea level rise projections with innovative tool designed to assist in the previous work examining physical impacts to the assets. Next.stakeholders were engaged to understand what needs design and implementation of a cohesive the tool should meet and how the tool could be structured management strategy that accounts for to support and align with existing processes and standards. climate risk across a broad portfolio of AECOM used this input to develop analyses that consider impacts over various time frames,examine proposed assets by providing an understanding of adaptation strategies at a variety of scales,and develop the tradeoffs between a range of potential assessments of strategies at various points in time.In climate adaptation responses. addition to internal benefits,improvements for stakeholders beyond the organization were also considered. In coastal areas,development built today and into the future Benefit and Outcomes will be subject to impacts from sea level rise.To understand The client Is using this tool to develop an internal alignment how to manage long-term risk and create a strategy to on management of long-term risk from sea level rise.The minimize future costs,AECOM used a triple bottom line tool informs users on project performance across a variety assessment and benefit-cost analysis that defines the value of indicators that includes local and regional strategies to of investing in climate adaptation and resilience in a coastal inform long-term asset management strategy.Outcomes context.The client,a leader in implementing an integrated include: approach to environmental sustainability,selected AECOM to develop the tool for internal use based on expertise M Development of a strategy to manage long-term risk relating to a wide variety of economic modeling in the and minimize costs of new development in areas context of flooding and sea level rise,as well as the ability subject to sunny day and storm surge flooding. to consider co-benefits from resilience investments and » Tool creation to allow users to demonstrate risk and present them to a broader group of internal and external return,then align project outcomes with the selected stakeholders. risk management strategy. Process:Sunny sky * Ability to communicate benefits beyond the organization to resilience investments. 4110 -® Timeline N/A i. I !I} i F Client Contact J Confidential romotho 52 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 130 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team City of Miami Beach REGIONAL PARTNERS PROJECT DIRECTOR ADVISORY TEAM 100RC GM&B Marcia Tobin,AICP Claire Bonham-Carter Sustainabillty+Resilience SE FL Regional Climate PROJECT MANAGER Compact Feliz Ventura Josh Sawislak.AICP Resilience Torn McGowan PE Stormwater Modeling+ Infrastructure ECONOMIC ANALYSIS COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS/ RISK MANAGEMENT/ Feliz Ventura MODEL MITIGATION Aaron McGregor Feliz Ventura Feliz Ventura Arno Hilberts,PhD(RMS) Daniel Stander(RMS) RESILIENCY PLANNING+ LAND USE STORMWATER/GROUNDWATER INSURANCE Marcia Tobin INFRASTRIICTURE Paul Wilson,PhD(RMS) Lauren Swan Amy Eason PE Melissa Higbee Michael Bennett PG FEMA FIRM MAPPING+ MODELING INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE+ Joe Chapman PE CFM DELIVERY Samara Barend GIS+DATA VISUALIZATION Alf iya Mirzagalyamova Joe Helkawski GISP BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 53 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 131 Marcia Tobin is a city and environmental planner with over 20 years experience focused on integrated solutions to complex planning and environmental issues, particularly at city.watershed,and regional scales.She is experienced leading O" multi-disciplinary project teams and incorporating stakeholder interests to „n. ;%w^s develop feasible solutions.Marcia's project portfolio includes climate adaptation and resilience planning,master plan development, site opportunity and • constraints analyses,environmental impact review,and project permitting and + ✓4 a” implementation.Education:MA,Geology/Geochemistry,Columbia University: MS,Forest Science-Environmental Chemistry,Yale University:BLA,Landscape Architecture,State University of New York.Certifications:American Institute of so: Certified Planners(AICP)4286128.Professional Associations:East Tennessee Quality Growth.Board member:University of Tennessee at Knoxville.School of Landscape Architecture Advocacy Board:San Francisco Urban Planning and MARCIA TOBIN, AICP Research Association(SPUR).Water Policy Board:American Planning Association(APA):Urban Land Institute(ULI).Associate Member.Awards+ Honors:Merit Award.Adapting to Rising Tides,Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Project,AEP and APA(Northern California),2012: National Science Foundation Graduate Research Traineeship in Hydrology,1996-1999: PROJ ECT DIRECTOR Research Fellowship.Atlantic Center for the Environment,1995:Certificate of Honor for Excellence in the Study of Landscape Architecture.ASLA.1988. RELEVAN T PROJECTS Adapting to Rising Tides: Transportation Vulnerability+Risk Climate Resiliency Program,Miami Assessment,San Francisco Bay Beach,FL.Project Director. Area,California.ProjectCo-Director. Comprehensive resilience program to AECOM assisted the Metropolitan protect critical assets and the built Transportation Commission(MTC),Bay environment from sea level rise and Conservation and Development increased flooding intensity. Commission(BCDC)and CalTrans with Vulnerability and risk assessment of a climate change vulnerability and risk City's critical assets to chronic climate assessment in a sub region of the San stresses,revision of the City's building Francisco Bay Area.The project and development codes,and a produced a detailed vulnerability prioritized implementation plan. analysis of sea level rise impacts on New York State Office of Climate regionally important transportation Change.Resiliency Strategies Lead. infrastructure and identified implementable strategies to address AECOM is conducting an assessment vulnerabilities and advance goals for of New York State agencies vulnerability to climate change.The transit oriented focused growth. results of this work will advance Land Use Study for Flooding and implementation of the Governor's Sea Level Rise Resilience,Hampton Climate Smart NY directive. Roads Planning District Stormwater Master Plan Update. Commission,Virginia.Resiliency City of Naples,Florida.Director.SLR Strategies Lead.AECOM is providing planning and evaluation.AECOM is multi disciplinary planning services for developing an update of the 2007 a strategic planning process among Stormwater Master Plan that the Cities of Norfolk and Virginia investigates key components of the Beach.the Commonwealth of Virginia. City's stormwater system and and four Navy installations.In the establishes a foundation for future Hampton Roads region,more frequent policy decisions.Key to the plan are flooding has been identified as an adaptation strategies that consider encroachment affecting military current and future sea level conditions, operations,causing stresses on integrate natural systems,offer existing infrastructure and co-benefits to the community and development patterns.This study is enhance city stormwater operations focused on identifying specific conditions,including recurrent and environmental protections efforts. flooding,coastal storms,and erosion. that have the potential to impact Navy operations,and the development of strategies to lessen impact and improve resilience. 54 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 132 Feliz M.Ventura has fourteen years of public sector,non profit and private sector experience in economic analysis and strategy development in the U.S.,Latin America,and Asia.Feliz has worked on projects across California the U.S.,and Latin America that seek to improve economic,environmental,and social outcomes for areas ranging from local communities to countries.She speaks English,Spanish and Portuguese.and has done business across the Americas, Asia and Europe.Prior to AECOM,Feliz was the clean technology program manager for the State of Washington's Department of Commerce focusing on technology-driven economic development.In this multifaceted role,she consulted with clean technology companies to negotiate investment,joint venture,and joint development agreements in Asia,the Americas.and Europe; and partnered with international development banks,US Departments of State and Commerce,and US Environmental Protection Agency on international F E L I Z VENTURA commercial and investment promotion.Education:MPIA,Quantitative Policy Analysis-Environmental Economics,University of California,San Diego,2003: BA,International Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Pomona College.2003.Certifications:NASBITE Certified Global Business Professional(CGBP)NASBITE NAFTA.Professional Associations:Journal of PROJ ECT MANAGER International Policy Solutions;Washington State Queensland Partnership;Clean Technology Committee;CleanTech Alliance Washington;Thompson Reuters ECONOMIC ANALYST, Carbon Market Community;Renewable Energy and Energy Efficient Partnership. COST BENEFIT MODELING, RELEVANT PROJECTS management strategy that accounts for climate risk by providing an RISK MANAGEMENT/ San Francisco Public Utilities understanding of the tradeoffs MITIGATION Commission,Flooding Resilience between a range of potential climate Study,San Francisco,CA.The broad adaptation responses. social impacts from flooding,ranging from damage to property to public Climate Adaptation and Coastal health and reputation effects,to the Resiliency Plan,City of Long Beach, utility from failure to prevent flooding. Long Beach,CA.In response to the were estimated by the AECOM team. California State Lands Commission Feliz served as the technical lead for requirement to assess the impact of the economics portion of this seal level rise on granted trust lands as multidisciplinary project.She a part of the City's Climate Adaptation developed initial methodologies for 18 and Coastal Resiliency Plan.Feliz led potential impact areas,working with the analysis of financial impacts across issue area analysts to gather data, multiple sea level rise scenarios. understand best practices and Temporary and permanent impacts implement a diverse range of impact were assessed for public and private analyses.Feliz serves as the primary property,infrastructure and the value point of contact for the client,has of lost use of granted trust lands. presented findings to other city and These impacts were compared to the federal agencies,as well as a key team estimated cost of adaptation member in establishing cost-benefit measures to derive the benefits from analysis frameworks and approaches adaptation actions. for the overall study. Financial Impacts of Sea Level Rise, Confidential Client,San Francisco Port of Los Angeles,Los Angeles, Bay Area.Feliz is the technical lead for CA.Feliz provided consultation and a triple bottom line assessment and review of the Port's approach to the benefit-cost analysis that defines the analysis of financial impacts across value of investing in climate adaptation multiple sea level rise scenarios. and resilience in a coastal context.The Temporary and permanent impacts are analyses consider impacts over being assessed for damaged goods various time frames for assets that will and infrastructure,and the value of lost experience climate impacts from new use of Port lands is also being sources over their lifespans.as well as considered.These impacts will be illuminate cobenefits from resilience compared to the estimated cost of investments using a triple bottom line adaptation measures to derive the approach.Findings will be benefits from adaptation actions. incorporated into a tool designed to assist in the design and implementation of a cohesive BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 55 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 133 Claire has extensive experience working on sustainable design and planning projects for a range of private and public sector clients including local,regional 4 and national government,both at a strategic and implementation level.She has a particular experience in climate change mitigation and adaptation planning for cities and agencies.Claire led the Adapting to Rising Tides project in the San Francisco Bay Area.a vulnerability and risk assessment to sea level rise for critical transportation infrastructure.She is currently working on a coastal resiliency and climate adaptation plan for the Port of Long Beach and an adaptation planning project for Santa Clara County,home of Silicon Valley.On the mitigation skie.worked on a route map to achieve 80%reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 for New York City and recently led a team advising on policy development for achieving zero carbon for buildings in Seattle.She CLAIRE has worked on climate action plans for a range Californian and UK cities,and sustainability frameworks for plans ranging In scale from downtown areas in San BO N H AM-CARTER Francisco and New Orleans,to large new communities in Mexico and Tianjin. China.She was recently on the Renewable Energy Task Force for the City of San Francisco.Education:MA.(Hons)in Natural Sciences.Certifications:LEED ADVISOR- Accrediated Professional 2007. SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE RELEVANT PROJECTS Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority MTA) FHWA,Hurricane Sandy Follow-Up Vulnerability Assessment Principal and Vulnerability Assessment and in Charge for the development of a Adaptation Analysis,NY,NJ and CT. Climate Vulnerability Assessment Co-Principal Investigator for a tri-state study of the impacts of Hurricane assets.et for As part part MTA's rail and bus network of this project AECOM Sandy on the region's multimodal has carried out a climate science transportation system.The effort review of global and downscaled includes a related analysis of regional regional climate models and other climate change and extreme weather research to understand how the potential vulnerabilities and impacts, climate may be changing between now as well as an assessment of feasible. and Year 2100 for the region and cost-effective adaptation strategies to update an asset inventorywith enhance resiliency. identification of the most critical Adapting to Rising Tides-San assets. Francisco Bay Area Transportation Port of Long Beach Climate Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Adaptation and Coastal Resiliency Pilot Project,San Francisco,CA. Strategy,Long Beach,CA.Principal Principal in Charge and Project in Charge.As the Port of Long Beach Manager.AECOM led the effort in and its tenants make ongoing assisting MTC.BCDC and CalTrans investments in maritime infrastructure with a climate change vulnerability and and operations.adaptation is integrally risk assessment of transportation linked with the Port's triple-bottom-line assets In a subregion of the San responsibilities of economic. Francisco Bay Area.This pilot project environmental and community produced a detailed subregional stewardship.Climate change and vulnerability analysis of sea level rise coastal hazards are anticipated to (SLR)impacts on regionally important cause director indirect consequences transportation infrastructure.It to the Port's infrastructure and identified implementable strategies for operations.AECOM is preparing a addressing vulnerabilities in ways that climate adaptation and coastal advance goals for transit-oriented resiliency plan for the Port to enhance focused growth.The overarching goal its infrastructure and operations.This for this project was to test the includes an evaluation of climate conceptual model and develop a change impacts,assessment of risks method to prepare a SLR adaptation to the Port and preparation and strategy for the planning area's implementation of a Climate Resiliency transportation network that will Plan. prevent significant disruptions and guide future investment decisions. 58 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 134 rillJosh Sawislak is the global director of resilience.He works across the entire enterprise of AECOM's offerings in planning,design,construction,finance. operations,and development to help develop and leverage resilient strategies projects and clients.Prior to rejoining AECOM,he served in the administration of President Barack Obama,most recently as the associate director for Climate Preparedness at the White House Council on Environmental Quality,where r' ' he develop US federal policy on climate adaptation and resilience and worked with foreign governments and international organization on multilateral and bilateral efforts.He also was a senior advisor to two HUD secretaries focused gad IIII on infrastructure and resilience at HUD and across government and led the development of the infrastructure recommendations for the president's Hurricane Sandy rebuilding task force.In this role,he was directly involved in the development of the Rebuild by Design competition co-sponsored by HUD and JOSH SAW I SLAK the Rockefeller Foundation and the development of the federal Infrastructure AIC p Resilience Guidelines.On the Sandy task force.Josh worked closely with federal, state,and local officials as well as private owners and operators of infrastructure systems such as power and communications to direct over$25 billion in federal ADVISOR-RESILIENCE funding for infrastructure recovery and resilience in the impacted region and well as national policy changes.Josh previously served as the US General Services Administration's Chief Emergency Response and Recovery Officer.As GSA's representative on White House committees,he was responsible for agency support to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.Department of Defense, and the US Agency for International Development in preparation and response to natural disasters other emergencies.Education:BA,Political Science.George Washington University,1986.Certifications:American Institute of Certified Planners.Affiliations: National Institute of Coastal and Harbor Infrastructure. Board of Directors:American Planning Association;UNISDR-ARISE US Network. Board of Directors:Evauteer.org.Board of Directors:National Academies of Science-Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Task Force On Resilience and Sustainability. RELEVANT PROJECTS Mayors,and senior federal,state,local. and tribal officials on plans for$50 Rockefeller Foundation,100 billion recovery efforts in New Jersey, Resilient Cities and Global New York,and other states impacted Resilience Academies,Greater by Hurricane Sandy.Was the principal Miami and the Beaches and other author of Infrastructure chapter of the cities.Serves as a subject matter Task Force's Strategy Report to the expert on general infrastructure President.Also developed new federal resilience,tidal and rlverine flood infrastructure resilience investment management issues,infrastructure guidelines for Hurricane Sandy and interdependency,federal rules and future federal infrastructure spending. funding,public-private partnerships and alternative funding strategies, Resilient by Design:Bay Area and resilience planning and policy for Challenge,San Francisco Bay Area. several current or past Rockefeller Josh serves as a member of the Foundation funded programs including AECOM led team selected for this 100 Resilient Cities,Global Resilience collaborative research and design Academies,and the National Disaster project that brings together local Resilience Competition academies. residents,public officials and local. He is also supporting AECOM's role national and international experts to as the strategy partner for 30 of the develop innovative solutions to the 100 Resilient Cities in the program, issues brought on by climate change including Greater Miami and the that the region faces today.The team Beaches,Honolulu.Seattle. is a diverse group of locally based/ globally experienced professionals, President's Hurricane Sandy academics,students,and policy Rebuilding Task Force,NJ/NY/ makers.We have come together CT and Washington DC. Served as to fuse science,design excellence, Senior Advisor to the Cabinet officials academic leadership,community and senior White House members outreach,and business innovation to of the President's Hurricane Sandy make the Bay Area more responsive to Rebuilding Task Force.Worked closely the people who live there and sensitive with Members of Congress,Governors, to the environments they share. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 57 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 135 - <`z, Tom McGowan is a client service manager who has been actively engaged in civil and agricultural engineering work in Florida for more than 21 years.He has performed extensive stormwater modeling for,and designed,permitted, e and overseen the construction of numerous water management facilities, providing stormwater attenuation.water quality treatment,water supply,and ., environmental enhancement including interconnected stormwater ponds, — aboveground impoundments,pumping stations,and water control structures. As a result of his design and permitting efforts,Tom is intimately familiar with the If '- rules and regulations regarding stormwater management system design,and he has established professional relationships with many of Florida's regulatory agencies,including the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,the Florida Department of Environmental Protection,and the South Florida Water Management District.Tom has worked closely with many counties and municipalities along THOMAS F. the Treasure Coast,Palm Beaches,and Greater Lake Okeechobee region, M C GO WAN PE gaining valuable Insight and experience in the complex issues associated with civil and agricultural engineering.His engineering design and consulting work includes many successful projects conducted for both public and private ADVISOR - clients.Education:BS,Civil Engineering,Carnegie Mellon University.1986. Certifications:Professional Engineer,Florida.Affiliations:Florida Association STORM WATE R of Special Districts:American Society of Civil Engineers. MODELING+ INFRASTRUCTURE RELEVANT PROJ ECTS Climate Resilience Program,City of Miami Beach,FL.Lead Stormwater Miami Beach Flood Mitigation Modeler.Comprehensive resilience Consulting Services,Miami Beach, program to protect critical assets and FL. Project Manager currently the built environment from sea level updating the recent master plan rise and increased flooding intensity. as a result of the proposed capital The project includes an assessment of improvement projects.Prepared the vulnerabilities of the City's critical hydraulic and hydrologic models assets to chronic climate stresses, (ICPR)and design reports for multiple feview and revision of the City's drainage basins for proposed building and development codes,and stormwater management sys tern identification of strategic adaptation improvements within the city,including strategies and actions.Cost benefit stormwater management and pollution and value assessment of resilience prevention systems to reduce flooding strategies applied to develop a impacts due to existing system prioritized implementation plan. deficiencies and projected sea level rise. Updating existing stormwater City of Palm Beach Gardens - master plan model(XPSWMM)and District Park,Stormwater Master managing the development of multiple Plan,Palm Beach Gardens,FL. basin studies for neighborhood Assisted with site planning and Improvements for the City's capital designed a conceptual stormwater improvement program to include master plan fora proposed 100-acre future sea level changes. Developing district park within the city limits. Basis of Design Reports for each of the Project duties included stormwater neighborhoods for the construction of management system design and the capital Improvements. modeling,alternatives analysis,and cost estimating. 58 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 136 Aaron McGregor specializes in applied public policy analysis. In his 10 years of M _ experience in social science research and economic analysis,he has worked with government agencies,academic institutions,non-governmental organizations. and private entities.Aaron's work is rooted In understanding the relationships between land use strategies in the built and natural environment and changes in economic activity and well-being.A large portfolio of Aaron's work addresses the socio-economic impacts from a changing climate,as well as the costs and benefits of adaptation measures that can help communities manage these Increasing risks.He has participated as an advisor and technical lead on a number of climate change vulnerability and adaptation studies,co-authored articles and reports on these topics,presented his work at professional conferences and meetings,provided expert testimony.and sat on committees to inform public policy.Before joining AECOM in 2016,Aaron worked as an AARON MCGREGOR economist for the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,a social scientist with the California Ocean Science Trust,an economic researcher with the State of California,and as an independent consultant.Education:MA,Planning (Environmental Policy Analysis and Land Use Economics),University of California, Los Angeles.2010:BA,Political Science(Political Economy)Westmont College. SENIOR ECONOMIST 2006.Professional Associations:California Shore and Beach Preservation Association,Board Member. RELEVAN I I'IZOJECTS scenarios.Temporary and permanent impacts are being assessed for Economic Impacts of Flooding,San damaged goods and infrastructure, Francisco Public Utilities and the value of lost use of Port lands Commission,San Francisco,CA.To is also being considered.These prioritize flood mitigation actions for impacts will be compared to the the City of San Francisco,Aaron is estimated cost of adaptation leading an alternative's based flood measures to derive the benefits from costing study.This work is helping to adaptation actions. contribute to a comprehensive infrastructure prioritization approach Citywide Storm Sewer System for planned grey and green wastewater Master Plan,San Jose,CA.Io inform conveyance infrastructure in the City capital improvement investments to of San Francisco over the next several the City of San Jose's stormwater decades as well as investments sewer system,Aaron Is leading a triple outside of the conveyance system. bottom line analysis(TBL)to evaluate Identified environmental,social and Financial Impacts of Sea Level Rise, financial costs and benefits.This City of Long Beach,CA.In response investigation Involves an assessment to the California State Lands of a suite of alternatives with varying Commission AB 691 requirement to combinations of grey and green assess the impact of seal level rise on infrastructure solutions. granted trust lands,Aaron is leading an analysis of the financial impacts across San Mateo County Sea Level Rise multiple sea level rise scenarios. Vulnerability Assessment,CA.*rhe Temporary and permanent impacts are objective of this assessment was to being assessed for at risk public and identify vulnerable assets on the bay private property,including critical and coast side of the San Mateo infrastructure.These impacts will be County peninsula,determine types of compared to the estimated cost of impacts,issue initial recommendations adaptation measures to derive the on adaptation measures,and improve benefits from adaptation actions. flooding and sea level rise mapping. Aaron evaluated the economic Financial Impacts of Sea Level Rise, vulnerability of critical county assets Port of Los Angeles,CA.In response (e.g..transportation,health care. to the California State Lands wastewater)to sea level rise and Commission AB 691 requirement to erosion,accounting for direct physical assess the impact of seal level rise on damages as well as effects to worker granted trust lands,Aaron provided productivity,regional employment and consultation and review of the Port's commercial and industrial entities. approach to the analysis of financial impacts across multiple sea level rise BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITYOF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 59 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 137 Lauren Swan is an experienced landscape plannerwitha background in landscape architecture and urban planning.She has diverse experience in community design.master lanni�J•streetscaPes,site and detail design as well as project management for both public and private sector clients.As the landscape planner for the City of Pembroke Pines,she rewrote the landscape code,wrote several codes of ordinance resolutions,drafted comprehensive plan amendments for green Initiatives as well as the creation gateway and open space plans.While with the City.Lauren also received a grant for implementation of her proposed streetscape design.Education:Master,Landscape Architecture,State University of New York Syracuse,2010:Bachelor,Urban and Regional Planning. Florida Atlantic University,2007.Affiliations:American Society of Landscape Architects. LAUREN SWAN RESILIENCY PLANNING RELEVANT PROJECTS City of Coral Gables.Maggiore Park, Coral Gables,FL Deputy Project + LAND USE Resilient Greater Miami and the Manager/Landscape Planner providing Beaches,Miami-Dade County,FL. landscape,hardscape,lighting, Working with 100 Resilient Cities, master planning,design,construction Miami-Dade County.City of Miami services and public outreach for a Beach.and City of Miami.Lauren community park reminiscent of a served Project Manager and Strategy Chinese Garden located in the city's Partner leading client coordination, Chinese Village. stakeholder engagement,workshop facilitation and report documentation City of Coral Gables,Kingsbay for a county-wide resilient strategy. Community Park,Coral Gables, FL Deputy Project Manager/ Miami Beach Rising Above,Miami Landscape Planner providing Beach.FL.Lauren served as Planner landscape,hardscape,lighting,site for this project with the City of Miami planning design,public outreach,and Beach.leading workshop facilitation construction administration services and planning efforts for a vulnerability for a linear park and pedestrian plaza assessment and workshops. located along the water's edge. Coral Gables Bicycle and Pedestrian City of Miami Beach,Altos Del Mar Infrastructure Plan,FL.Working Park,Miami Beach,FL.Landscape with the City of Coral Gables.Lauren Planner providing landscape. provided analysis and design of bicycle hardscape,lighting.master planning, pathways and amenities through a design.and community workshop stakeholder engagement processservices for the last oceanfront, City of Coral Gables.Alhambra Park, undeveloped 2.5-acre park with Coral Gables,FL.Deputy Project proposed pedestrian paths,botanical Manager/Landscape Planner providing garden like features,bocce court,and landscape,hardscape,lighting,' sand volleyball courts to create a park master planning,design,community that is in keeping with the natural and workshops and construction services urban landscape. for a community park with proposed seating walls,inclusive play areas,civic scale trellis and seating area. City of Tamarac,Tamarac Park Master Plan,Tamarac,FL.Landscape Planner for this parks,recreation and open space masterplan that Identifies existing conditions,needs assessments,planning framework and recommendations based on input from city staff and civic engagement. 60 AECO M RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 138 Melissa Higbee has more than six years of experience in urban and * AIIPP environmental planning for the public sector,including climate change Al vulnerability assessments,adaptation strategy development,hazard mitigation planning,and stakeholder engagement.She has two years of experience Atiat 1R designing and testing public engagement tools regarding flooding risks with the MIT Science Impact Collaborative.In addition,Melissa has provided economic i • t , • analysis to local governments for transit development and economic development planning.She has also worked at the Energy Foundation on strategic grant-making to advance state-level energy efficiency policies. Education:MA,City Planning,Massachusetts Institute of Technology;BA, Geography,University of California,Berkeley.Certifications:Envision Sustainability Professional Certificate in Environmental Planning. MELISSA HIGBEE RELEVANT PROJECTS collaborated with four at-risk coastal New England communities to assess Long Beach Redevelopment Agency, local climate change risks,identify key Downtown Long Beach Market challenges and opportunities for RESILIENCY PLANNING Study,Long Beach,CA.Project adaptation,and test the use of analyst on a team that evaluated the role-playing simulations as a means to + LAND USE market demand for a mix of uses that educate the public about climate would support living and working in change threats and to help downtown Long Beach.After communities explore ways of assessing demand for downtown decreasing their vulnerability and housing,office space.and hotel rooms, enhancing their resilience to climate the team evaluated how growth of change impacts.Developed a risk these uses could also drive retail assessment,stakeholder assessment. demand in downtown.Created an and role-playing simulation for the city implementation strategy to build on of Cranston. the strength of downtown's assets and leverage increased retail investment. City of San Diego,San Diego The project received the award for Regional Research Agenda for Sea Planning Excellence in Comprehensive Level Rise,San Diego,CA. Planning-Large Jurisdiction at the Documented information and data 2073 American Planning Association needed for city planners and resource Los Angeles Awards. managers to plan for sea level rise in the San Diego region after information City of Los Angeles,Los Angeles gaps were revealed by the San Diego Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Bay Adaptation Strategy.Goals Assessment,Los Angeles.CA. included ensuring researchers Project analyst for an effort led by understand the information University of Southern California-Sea practitioners need to plan for sea level Grant.The project team used a rise,helping planners and resource science-based and stakeholder-driven managers understand the adaptation planning process to opportunities and constraints around examine the potential impacts of sea future research related to sea level rise. level rise on municipally-owned assets. and directing research funding and A number of important assets were activity to areas that require advance situated close to sea level including planning for sea level rise. two power plants,two wastewater treatment plants,and a major port.In County of Santa Clara,Silicon Valley addition,the city's beaches are major 2.0 Regional Climate Adaptation economic drivers that attract millions Plan,Santa Clara County,CA.Project of tourist every year.There are also a analyst responsible for conducting a number of smaller assets,such as gap analysis to evaluate the current pipes,roadways,and electricity preparedness of the county's energy equipment potentially at risk. and communications sectors for anticipated impacts of climate change New England Climate Adaptation and developing adaptation strategies. Project and City of Cranston,New Conducted the economic England Climate Adaptation, consequences analysis,estimating the Cranston,RI.Project analyst for work economic impacts of temporary or funded by a grant from the National permanent impairment of assets due Estuarine Research Reserve System to climate change. Science Collaborative.The team BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 61 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 139 Samara Barend serves a dual role in AECOM as both Vice President and PPP Strategic Development Director for North America and as a Director in Public Private Partnership(PPP)AECOM Capital.In these roles.she provides leadership in AECOM's PPP work across all business lines,including energy. *, water,transportation,and buildings and facilities. In addition,she identifies and develops PPP project Investments and is responsible for helping create the strongest private sector consortium to bid on them.Sam also supports project bids after teaming has been established through the entire procurement process. Sam also provides considerable assistance to states in the development of PPP policy frameworks,potential projects,and legislation.She recently served as Deputy Project Manager for the PPP study commissioned by the Washington SAMARA BAREND State Joint Transportation Committee to investigate the suitability of PPP delivery to major transportation projects. Prior to her position at AECOM,Sam served as Executive Director of the New York State Commission on Asset Maximization.The SAM Commission,was charged with exploring public-private opportunities in New York State. The Commission INFRASTRUCTURE released a final report which identified 26 specific public-private opportunities and proposed a transparent process for undertaking those ventures. FINANCE+ DELIVERY Sam has served as Vice President and Government Affairs Director for STV. and was responsible for overseeing,and often leading,industry-wide policy initiatives.In 2004,she ran as the Democratic candidate in New York's 29th U.S.Congressional district race,holding her opponent to 50.8%of the vote and becoming one of the youngest women to run for federal office. She has also worked as the Statewide Neighborhood Program Director for Hillary Clinton's U.S. Senate campaign and as Upstate Director for the New York Democratic State Committee. Further,from 1996-2000 Sam spearheaded the successful effort to convert New York State's Route 17 into Interstate 86. This interstate campaign resulted in the passage of the Interstate 86 Act,a bill which she drafted for Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan that was included in the 1998 Federal Transportation Reauthorization. Education:Master,Public Policy.Harvard University,John F.Kennedy School of Government,1999:BS,Management,University of Pennsylvania,1999. Affiliations: Educational Housing Services.Board Member:Doc to Dock, Board Membe:Women's Builders Council,Board Member:International Project Finance Association.Board Member:Citizens Budget Committee:New York State Transportation Bond Act Campaign:New York State Gov.Elliot Spitzer Transition Team. 62 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 140 Alfiya Mirzagalyamova is a senior consultant specializing in the areas of long- term financial planning for infrastructure services,investment project fi nancial analysis,assessment of market and regulatory risks,and application of public- private partnerships(P3s)methods to attract private finance in infrastructure ik'. rc renewal and expansion.Her responsibilities Include developing and using tools to project future capital and operational expenditures,estimate annual funding gaps,and develop long-term financing plans and strategies.Education:MBA. • Finance,University of Maryland,2006:Master.Public Finance,Indiana University. 1997:BA,English and Education,Tashkent State University of Economics,1992. Affiliations: American Society of Landscape Architects. ALFIYA B. MIRZAGALYAMOVA INFRASTRUCTURE REI EVAN ROJ I CI S Government of Russia, Infrastructure Financing Options FINANCE+ DELIVERY World Bank,Public Private Study,Various Locations." Partnerships Research and Training, Analyzed data on energy,transport, Washington,DC.*Reported on global telecom,and municipal services trends In public-private partnerships. providers.Compared historical Researched contractual arrangements trends in infrastructure finance (management lease,concession, across infrastructure subsectors build-own-transfer,build-own-operate and analyzed patterns in the use of contracts and divestitures)used debt and equity financing for capital to attract private investment,the improvements for a study that outlined types of financing provided,as well recommendations for the Russian as the main sponsors and investors. government on creating regulatory Delivered training on the"Rationale, framework and favorable conditions Objectives and Challenges of Public- for infrastructure PPPs. Private Partnerships in Infrastructure" to 40 government officials at the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Washington-based Institute for Public- Authority,Revenue Study,Atlanta, Private Partnerships(IP3). GA.Evaluated potential local revenue sources to support MARTA in decision- World Bank.Sustainable Tourism making regarding the strategy to Development*Estimated net present finance new capital projects(Clifton value(NPV)of economic and financial Corridor LRT.I-20 BRT/HRT.and GA costs and benefits.rate of return(IRR). 400 HRT).Assessed the potential and fiscal impact of the proposed yield,equity,legality and political investments to build a bulk water utility acceptability of each candidate in Montenegro.as part of the due source.The findings assisted MARTA diligence for the US$60 million credit in developing a preliminary strategy to the government(2007). for supplementing a potential federal Various Regional Governments, funding with the required local revenue Municipal Lending Development, match. Various Locations."Surveyed National Power Transmission regional governments in Russia Company,Electricity Market with regard to financial condition, Reform.*\orked witli LSE infrastructure investment needs. International,an Ireland-based availability,and cost of funding. international private utility operator. Traveled to three regions to assess on the design of a staff redundancy the creditworthiness and borrowing program for the National Power capacity.The due diligence led to the Transmission Company.Prepared structuring of a partial credit guarantee the economic and financial cost- for the Republic of Chuvashia 5-year benefit analysis of staff reduction and maturity bond. designed severance packages. 'work prior to AECO M. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 63 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 141 Arno heads up the flood modelling team within Model Development at RMS. Previous to this,he has held various positions within Model Development.He started out in 2006 as a Senior Modeler working on model development of the RMS UK Inland Flood model,and has since worked on various other flood and tsunami modelling projects.Alongside model development work Arno has collaborated on research into the effects of climate change on the likelihood of flood events.He's also involved in various EU-funded research projects,either as an industry partner or as an advisory board member. Developing Flood Scenarios .riri Arno has worked on developing stochastic flood scenarios in the context of flood model development within RMS,including stochastic precipitation modelling for ARNO H ILBERTS arid regions(e.g.,Texas,U.S.).The research involved and experience gained can PH D equally be used to develop drought scenarios. Modelling of the economic effects of natural catastrophes Arno has also been involved in assessing the economic consequences of natural COST BENEFIT MODEL- hazards,and floods in particular. ING(RMS) Education:PhD and MSc,Wageningen University.Netherlands. 64 A ECO M RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 142 Amy Eason is a senior client service manager with experience in water resources and water and wastewater engineering.Her responsibilities include project design and management,hydraulic and hydrologic modeling,and permitting. Amy's experience includes special taxing districts.land development,surface water management systems,water reservoir routing,utility design,water and wastewater treatment plants,and roadway design.Education:BS,Environmental Engineering,Mercer University,1997.Certifications:Professional Engineer, Florida and Georgia.Affiliations: National Society of Professional Engineers; American Society of Civil Engineers:Florida Stormwater Association:Florida Engineering Society. AMY EASON PE STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE RELEVANT PROJECTS current and future sea level conditions, integrate natural systems,offer City of Miami Beach,Flood co-benefits to the community and Mitigation Services,Miami Beach, enhance city stormwater operations FL.Deputy Project Manager.Currently and environmental protections efforts. updating current master plan to include climate change and resiliency South Indian River Water Control elements to the plan the capital District,Palm Beach County,FL. Improvement projects for stormwater District Engineer for a 13,500 acre infrastructure facilities.Incorporating water control district location in resiliency elements in the design of Jupiter,Florida.District engineering stormwater infrastructure.Prepared services includes preparing capital hydraulic and hydrologic models improvement plans every year.assist (ICPR)and design reports for multiple in reviewing and resolving Board drainage basins for proposed of Supervisors and Landowners stormwater management system issues for general consulting and improvements within the city.Included permitting,interlocal coordination conceptual layout and design of with government agencies,and stormwater management and pollution preparing engineers reports and prevention systems to reduce flooding plans of improvements.The district impacts due to existing system infrastructure consists of canals, deficiencies and projected sea level roadways,water mains,and secondary rise.Updating existing stormwater drainage systems. master plan model(XPSWMM)and Martin County,Indiantown managing the development of multiple Development of Regional Impacts. basin studies for neighborhood Martin County,FL.Prepared portions improvements for the City's capital of the development of regional Improvement program to include impacts document and participated future sea level changes.Developing in the surface water management Basis of Design Reports for each of the and development design of an 806- neighborhoods for the construction of acre area.Prepared hydrologic and the capital improvements. hydraulic modeling of the basin City of Naples Stormwater Master including off-site inflows to ensure Plan Update.Naples.FL.Project pass-through for the project.Worked Manager for the update to the on the environmental resource 2007 Stormwater Master Plan that permit for the South Florida Water Investigates key components of Management District permitting and the City's stormwater system and permitting for other related agencies. establishes a foundation for future Worked with the county on master plan policy decisions.Key to the plan are approvals. adaptation strategies that consider BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 66 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 143 Michael Bennett is a licensed professional geologist with over 26 years of irexperience Ahydrogeology,ground water modeling.geochemistry,and 10 geophysics.He provides technical consultation on the design,permitting, • groundwater hydrology.aquifer storage and recovery and deep water injection projects.He offers expertise in hydrogeologic and geochemical characterization of ground water systems,groundwater flow modeling,borehole and surface f geophysics investigations and the permitting and design of Class 1,II and V Water Injection Well systems.He also brings his expertise with project and construction management of multi-million dollar Water Injection Well projects.Michael is a Principal Hydrogeologist for the firm.Education:Master.Hydrogeology: Bachelor,Geology.Certifications:Professional Geologist:Florida(PG1558), Texas,Louisiana.Affiliations: Florida Association of Professional Geologist, MICHAEL W. National Ground Water Association.American Waterworks Association, American Institute of Professional Geologists. B E N N ETT PG GROUNDWATER RELEVANT PROJECTS Collier County Florida,This model encompassed a 350 square mile INFRASTRUCTURE City of Miami Beach Flood area of southwest Florida and was Mitigation Services,FL.Served as compiled,processed,and simulated Technical Expert providing hydro- using the USGS"ModFlow"computer geological studies for hydraulic code.The model was calibrated and barriers,and monitoring program verified under both steady-state and for the underground water resource transient ground water conditions infrastructure. and once calibrated and verified, Kissimmee River Basin,Floridan sensitivity and predictive analyzes Aquifer Ground Water Resource were completed.This model was Evaluation,South Florida Water developed for permitting and regional Management District Served groundwater resource planning as project manager.assessed purposes.Published modeling the Floridan Aquifer system in the efforts and results in SFWMD Kissimmee River Basin.Several Technical Publication entitled"A Floridan Aquifer production and three-dimensional finite difference • monitor wells were constructed and ground water flow model of western tested at three separate locations. Collier County,Florida:South Florida The objective of this work was to Water Management District Technical provide hydraulic,water quality,and Publication 92-04". hydrogeo logic data on the Floridan Fort Pierce Utilities Authority,Fort Aquifer system in support of the Pierce,FL.Served as project manager Kissimmee River Water Supply Plan for the design and permitting of two and the Comprehensive Everglades new Floridan Aquifer production wells Restoration Program Aquifer Storage and the deepening and acidization and Recovery Regional Study.This of three existing Floridan Aquifer project assessed the water quality production wells.The specific and production capacity of the deepening and acidization plan was Floridan Aquifer system to determine developed using field data to increase its sustainability as a water supply water production capacity by an source in Central Florida.The results average of five times.The original of the exploratory test program were well design was modified to increase documented via in-house technical the casing size and setting depths. reports,and the data collected was which increased the well's capacity instrumental in the development of a and decreased well development conceptual hydrogeologic model of time.Completed engineering report the Floridan Aquifersystern in this area. documented the well construction Western Collier Co.Ground and testing activities on the well Water Flow Model,South Florida field expansion effort.Engineered Water Management District.FL. and oversaw the construction of Project Manager and Lead Modeler. the wellhead surface facilities and Conceptualization and development of the instrumentation and controls to a finite-difference,three dimensional operate Floridan Aquifer production ground water f ow for western wells. 86 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 144 Daniel has spent his entire career bringing new ideas to the risk transfer industry. A Managing Director since 2012,Daniel currently has responsibility for driving content,innovation and replicable.strategic solutions across RMS'entire client base.He is also the Global Head of RMS'Public Sector Group,with overall +46"'s leadership responsibility for RMS'relationships with its supranational,sovereign and local government clients. 44, Over the last 15 years,Daniel has covered both government and corporate clients on every continent and in almost every sector,advising them across RMS' a .. full product spectrum on a variety of complex risks,from natural hazards, odaterrorism and pandemic to marine,supply chain and cyber. DANIEL STAN D E R Daniel has worked with non-profit entities as diverse as cities,central banks, finance ministries,healthcare agencies,transportation authorities,security agencies,national insurance pools,quasi-government agencies,international RISK MANAGEMENT/ development donors and NGOs.He is currently advising RMS'public sector clients in mature and emerging markets alike.helping them articulate their risk MITIGATION(RMS) tolerance,quantify their exposure.develop mitigation strategies.reduce disaster risk build resilience to extreme events,finance infrastructure projects and transfer residual risk. From 2006-2012 Daniel oversaw the strategic direction of RMS'operations in London.Europe and Bermuda.driving considerable growth across several of RMS'most significant client relationships.In 2012 he was promoted to Managing Director,joining RMS'Global Leadership Council and assuming responsibility for product and service innovation globally. Prior to RMS.Daniel managed the group strategy and development function at BUPA.the 80.000-employee,£10bn global healthcare group,serving 29 million customers in over 190 countries.He also has considerable start-up experience, having been a founding team member of an award-winning,SaaS company, bringing internet technologies to the risk transfer value chain.Prior to that.Daniel worked for Deutsche Bank in their Technology Research team. Daniel is a frequent speaker at industry events.He has often been quoted in specialist publications,such as Strategic Risk,Asia Insurance Review and Risk& Insurance. Daniel has served on the Board of Trustees and the management boards of a number of charities.His charitable work has been in areas as varied as education. disability,interfaith social cohesion.migrant peoples.grassroots sport and the arts. Educatiorc Led MA seminars in the institutes of Philosophy,Cultural Studies and Aesthetics,Humboldt Universitat;Double First BA(Hons.).Philosophy and Modern Languages,Wadham College,Oxford University:3 A Levels,all at grade 'P;City of London School. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 67 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 145 Joe Chapman is the North American technical practice lead for flood management in the US.He has extensive experience in floodplain modeling and mapping,flood risk assessment,and flood mitigation projects in support of federal,state.and local agencies:stormwater analysis and design:and has provided post-disaster support ranging from field damage assessments to development of flood recovery mapping to support rebuilding efforts.Joe has over25 years of experience managing and performing small-and large-scale water resource projects as both an engineer and project manager.In July 2014, /+a he returned from a 3-year assignment in AECOM's Brisbane,Australia office where he was technical director for the Queensland Water Resources group. Prior to that,he led the Watershed Concepts division of the AECOM's US Water business line and was responsible for the operations of 12 offices with over 160 JOSEPH CHAPMAN employees in North America performing floodplain mapping,flood risk assessment flood hazard mitigation,and geospatial projects in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.Education:BS,CMI Engineering, FEMA FIRM MAPPING+ Clemson University,1988.Certifications:Professional Engineer,North Carolina: MODELING Certified Floodplain Manager.Affiliations:South Carolina Association for Hazard Mitigation:North Carolina Association of Floodplain Managers:Indiana Association for Floodplain and Stormwater Management:American Society of CMI Engineers. RELEVANT PROJECTS Tennessee.Florida,and Kentucky, which includes 90-plus countywide Federal Emergency Management DFIRM projects.Manage study Agency-Region IV,Flood Insurance Studies and Digital Flood Insurance implementation.cost estimating. and contract negotiation:scoping: Rate Map Production Indefinite LiDAR acquisition;technical study Delivery/Indefinite Quantity initiation:implementation of Earned Contract,TN.Program manager in Value Management System reporting Tennessee,Florida.and Kentucky, procedures;Mapping Information which includes 90-plus countywide Platform workflow processes;and DFIRM projects.Manage study monthly invoicing and reporting. implementation.cost estimating, Responsible for overall study quality. and contract negotiation:scoping; compliance with floodplain boundary LiDAR acquisition:technical study standards,data capture standard,and initiation:implementation of Earned FEMA guidelines and specifications. Value Management System reporting procedures,Mapping Information Mecklenburg County,Watershed Platform workflow processes;and Study Updates and Digital Flood monthly invoicing and reporting. Insurance Rate Map Mapping, Responsible for overall study quality, Mecklenburg County,NC.Principal compliance with floodplain boundary in charge responsible for contract standards,data capture standard,and management and implementation of FEMA guidelines and specifications. the quality assurance program.Work Federal Emergency Management includes updated watershed-based studies for nine different watersheds Agency,Post-Disaster Damage covering over 180 miles of stream Assessments,Nationwide. within the county.Studies included Performed field damage assessments development of updated existing and and completed more than 30 damage future land hydrologic and hydraulic assessment reports under FEMA's models for the 2.10 15 50.100. Public Assistance program,as part of and 500-year existing conditions disaster declarations in San Francisco storms and 100-year future conditions and Santa Cruz.California:Spring storm.Responsible for facilitating Hill,Tennessee:Elba.Alabama:and watershed-based stakeholder groups Charleston.South Carolina.* to obtain concurrence on land use Federal Emergency Management updates that are developed. Agency-Region IV,Flood Insurance Studies and Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Production Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contract KY.Program manager in 88 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 146 Paul leads the development of the RMS North Atlantic hurricane and storm-surge models.Since joining RMS In 2007,he has overseen the development of the medium-term U.S.hurricane activity rate forecast methodology and supported the design of several parametric indices for capital markets transactions.He is also the meteorological signatory for the RMS submission to the Florida Commission on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology,the independent panel `} of experts created during the 1995 legislative session to evaluate methodologies for projecting hurricane losses.Paul led the RMS contribution to the Risky ' Business project on the economic risk of climate change in the United States, commissioned by former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson.Paul supervised the RMS team working with world-leading economists and scientists to develop a comprehensive view of the PAUL WILSON PH D economic risks associated with climate change.Using modified RMS North Atlantic Hurricane and Storm Surge Models,economic damage to coastal areas was quantified based on rising sea levels along with changes in the frequency INSURANCE(RMS) and severity of storms due to climate change.Before joining RMS,Paul worked for the Lighthill Risk Network,a not-for-profit organization dedicated to linking academia and industry.He began his career on Aon's catastrophe modeling team in London. Education:Doctorate.Philosophy.Atmosphere Physics.Imperial College. London,2004;Master,Physics.First Class(Hons.),Imperial College,London, 2000.Certifications:Certified Catastrophe Risk Analyst. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM as RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 147 Joe Helkowski a Senior GIS Analyst for the Mid-Atlantic Region.He has both skills and experiences in hydrological modeling.GIS applications and development, and remote sensing image processing.His main academic focus was on the development of a socioeconomic drought index for the entire globe.This was accomplished through the modification of a geospatial hydrological model that would simulate available global runoff,at which the output was compared to generated global spatial maps of total freshwater demand from a spatial census data to,ultimately,identify regions over the globe that are susceptible to water shortages.Before joining AECOM.Joe worked at the Department of Resources in Wisconsin,where his professional experience included the automation of geoprocessing procedures for scoring wetlands In the Milwaukee Basin. geodatabase conceptual design and implementation for the Aquatic Invasive JOSEPH H. Species Program,and development of a spatial inventory for collected small H E L KO W S K I mammal specimens throughout the state.Education:MS.Environmental Monitoring(Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Technologies).University of Wisconsin,2004:BS,Biology,Stetson University,1994.Certifications:Certified GIS Professional.Affiliations:American Water Resources Association: GIS+ DATA American Society for Photogrammetry&Remote Sensing:American VISUALIZATION Geophysical Union. REL EV.ANT PROJECTS South Florida Water Management District.Kissimmee Basin South Florida Water Management Hydrologic Assessment-Terrain District,Kissimmee Basin Development.West Palm Beach,FL. Hydrologic Assessment-Tool Designed and created a geodatabase Development and Review,West to organize multiple sources of Palm Beach,FL.Customizes tools topographic data available for the written in Python to be used In ArcGIS Kissimmee Basin including USGS 9.x Desktop to automate intricate and National Elevation Data and USACE repetitive geoprocesses.Examples survey data.Built three separate of this objective include daily raster terrain datasets to represent the datasets(4,383)interpolated from progressing phases of the Kissimmee rain gauge measurements:15-minute River Restoration project.Converted raster datasets(7.296)generated the terrain datasets to DEMs to be from NEXRAD tabular data:and daily used in the modeling effort for the raster datasets(14,975)processed project. from the 2-mix 2-mi SFWMM tabular data.Other tools have been US Air Combat Command, developed to calculate storage area Atchafalaya Basin Floodway and volume of lakes.carry out quality Environmental GIS Needs Inventory control and assurance checks on and Assessment,Various Locations, newly created data,and to import LA.Participated in the inventory and time series data into the AHED assessing the needs for a watershed- geodatabase.Additionally,codes based GIS for the 1.000-square-mile VBA macros in Microsoft Excel to floodway system,development of a condition and format aspatial data. standard questionnaire,and interviews Performed a multi-agency thorough of approximately 45 agencies and review of Temporal Analyst ArcGIS individuals to assess the need for GIS extension's capabilities for accurately capabilities and identify the needs for analyzing and evaluating alternative additional data or data conversion. model simulations with performance Assisted with development of a measures defined by project team statement of work for creation of members a GIS repository to meet C41SP requirements and standards and to South Florida Water Management District,Three Lakes Wildlife comply withallapplicableDOD.US Management Area Hydrologic Army Corps EGIS standards for the level of security required,with a web- Resto ration,Kenansville,FL. based application for data viewing and Responsible for support and querying. stewardship of all geospatial data. 70 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 148 Section 3 Approach and Methodology . Ade t 0. O RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 149 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 150 3.1 Approach and Methodology UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGE APPROACH:GUIDING PRINCIPLES To understand the value of the City of Miami Beach's Decision-making about the Investments needed to potential investments to address flooding and sea level rise, adapt to a changing climate in the short-,mid-and long- AECOM proposes an analysis that will estimate the cost term should reflect a number of economic,social and of inaction and the benefits of protection and adaptation environmental considerations as well as the inherent investments,which are equivalent to the risk reduction tradeoffs that can manifest from specific actions taken. from the investment,and the potential for risk reduction.In When evaluating risks from flooding and SLR,uncertainty order to compare the costs and benefits of the investment is present in any methodology that is used because of and examine the business case for these investments, Incomplete knowledge of existing and future conditions. all economic outputs will be presented in dollar terms to Some of these uncertainties stem from the complexity of facilitate communication and decision making. physical processes,event-specific characteristics such as geographic extent and severity,inaccurate inventories All economic outputs will be presented in dollar terms of the built environment and human behavior before. to facilitate communication and decision making. during and after an event.While risk can generally not be Any identified outputs that do not lend themselves to eliminated,it can be managed according to an acceptable monetization,but may be critical for interpretation in the standard or desired level.Our objective in partnering with context of a triple bottom line or equivalent analysis,will be the City of Miami Beach is twofold:(1)help articulate the quantified for the purpose of comparison, key questions needed for understanding key economic and financial risks,and(2)conduct credible,salient,and Flooding and sea level rise(SLR)can impact the people, tractable analyses that can inform investment decisions property and infrastructure that underpin the economy around managing risk in a manner that is transparent and of Miami Beach and the government that supports it.and justifiable to City management,the public,grant makers as a result,any investment that mitigates these impacts and other potential funders,and the residents and business would have broad effects on the City's economy.The community of Miami Beach. AECOM team has experience estimating impacts from a wide variety of sources(i.e..beyond property damage), Our work with the City will be guided by a number of and the reduction in risk resulting from stormwater principles,including but not limited to: improvements,resiliency measures and adaptation strategies for government clients seeking to understand » Developing a shared understanding and open dialogue and communicate the business case for these actions as that can account for local knowledge at each step.of well as to tailor,phase and fund supporting infrastructure the study: and programs.In addition to creating robust,custom analyses,AECOM also has extensive experience developing » Aligning and coordinating with past and planned tools for use by governments and private corporations to studies to leverage knowledge and conduct the model and communicate investment approaches to flood- analysis in a cost-effective manner: management infrastructure,programs and projects,and their associated costs and benefits. » Using the best available science to evaluate risk types from a comprehensive risk management framework that maps onto and bolsters existing risk reduction strategies:and Creating products and tools that are accessible and useful to decision-makers in the City as well as other local,state and federal stakeholders who may be potential project partners in reducing risk. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 71 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 151 THE BUSINESS CASE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE, Indirect Effects:costs to inter-industry and societal RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION relationships resulting from damages and first-order losses. At the core of the business case analysis are the impacts of flooding and SLR on property,Infrastructure,people, Properly Value:Loss in property value. and the City.These impacts include both direct damage to assets in the City,as well as the broader societal effects » Public Health Impact:Costs of health Impacts of flood- that could result from disruption to economic activity in related dampness,mold,and waterborne disease Miami Beach and the region.The following elements will be as well as mental health related-considerations if considered in the business case that seeks to quantify the appropriate. benefits of protective infrastructure,the remaining risk with infrastructure in place,and the cost of inaction in a scenario * Fiscal Impact:Reductions in property,business and without infrastructure: sales tax revenues and downstream effects on the City's ability to pay back debt and the municipal credit Damages:costs borne by people and property as a rating. direct result of flooding. Insurance Premiums:Changes driven by risk profile of • Structure and Contents:Costs of damage to residential, private property and public infrastructure. commercial,industrial,and public/institutional buildings,their contents,as well as vehicles and any Other Impact Areas for Consideration:In addition to the associated cleanup costs. economic and financial loss types described above,further consideration could be given to the following impact types: » Area Infrastructure:Costs of damage to infrastructure for transportation,public streetscape,utilities,and » Cultural Heritage:Locations that may or may not be other Infrastructure. accessible for visiting as well as activities,such as annual celebrations,in specific locations. • Disruption/Relocation:Costs related to displacement and relocation of people from residential and » Natural Resources:Losses to natural landscapes and institutional buildings. vegetation(with ecosystem services if applicable/as possible)as well as other recreational areas. • Emergency and Flood Fighting Response:Labor costs of mobilizing flood-specific emergency response » Environmental Justice:Complex interactions between services. environmental stressors and socio-demographic conditions. First-Order Losses:costs caused by interruptions to economic activity such as production and Industry Effects:Cost impact to economic sectors at consumption, end of the production chain such as tourism dependent industries. » Business Effects:Costs from business impacts, including interruption to business,lost wages,business Each of these types of impacts will require specific closure,and lost tax revenue. attention to the local dynamics at play.For instance,when evaluating business impacts,losses will be experienced » Traffic and Transit Disruption:Costs of travel delays to differently by small entities,or seasonally dependent roadway and transit users. businesses like those in the tourism sector,than their larger,non-seasonal counterparts.Similarly,economic • Interruption to Public Services:Costs from interruption consequences to workers will vary depending if their to power.water,and wastewater utility services,and compensation is based on an hourly or salary agreement to fire,police.hospital.and emergency coordination By accounting for these differences,the City wIll have services. knowledge that can be used to prioritize investments and develop solutions of appropriate scale for varying profiles » Temporary Loss of Community Amenities:Value loss from inaccessible beaches,parks and other outdoor of economic vulnerability. community and recreational amenities. 72 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 152 PROPOSED APPROACH TO TASK ORDERS Although AECOM uses best-in-class methodologies for Because flooding and SLR are impacting a complex translating changes in physical conditions into dollar system of economic,financial,social and environmental estimates of impact,models specific to the City of Miami relationships that translate into dollars and cents,the Beach will be developed to ensure we capture specific analyses conducted to discern these impacts can be conditions and processes that influence the resulting equally complex and potentially time-consuming.To estimates.This approach also allows us to calibrate models ensure that a full-scale analysis would have the benefit of with conditions that reflect on-the-ground realities in Miami fine-tuning resulting from a smaller,more rapid analysis. Beach,ensure that model results specifically address AECOM proposes to perform a pilot analysis focusing on stakeholder concerns,and position decision makers to property-based elements before expanding the analysis to clearly explain to stakeholders how their concerns have a larger area and including more elements that capture an been incorporated into the model and resulting estimates. economy-wide business case. AECOM's team of integrated hydraulic and hydrological APPROACH TO PILOT ANALYSIS modelers that specialize In flood management infrastructure and our coastal engineering teams are The pilot analysis would provide an opportunity to develop able to identify the combined impacts flooding and SLR a shared understanding of vulnerable elements and the have on real-world property,infrastructure,people and physical impacts resulting from changes In flooding and SLR the economic activity they support.Our team will use management.The pilot analysis would focus on a relatively a combination of coastal risk modeling and mapping. concentrated area,perhaps one with a recently completed hydraulic and hydrological modeling,GIS mapping,and or planned project,such as Sunset Harbour or the Bayview. locally-relevant values for cost accrual based on industry- An ideal area would include a variety of the elements subject leading methodologies accepted by agencies such as to flooding and SLR impacts described above in order to FEMA,USAGE,and Federal Highway Administration(FHWA), develop and vet information that feeds into the assessment to populate transparent,locally-relevant models that could of impacts,such as information on characteristics of be shared directly with the City. different types of buildings and businesses as well as the performance of stormwater management infrastructure under combined storm and SLR conditions. Baseline Citywide Citywide Assumptions+ Design ADAPT g Infrastructure- Property Asset Data Rules for Storm Data Data Assigning Cost1, Surface GIS Extent of ECONOMIC H+HMODELS Flooding MODELS Inundation on Assets REPRESENTATIVE BASELINE OUTPUTS rb INFRASTRUCTURE ECONOMIC IMPACT PROJECT SET+COST OF FLOODING Figure 1.Modeling Process Chart(Source.AECOM) BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 73 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 153 The AECOM team would apply this experience to the All of these elements could then impact the City's property analysis of the five-year return period storm and 2060 tax base,real estate market and financial mortgage cycles southeast Florida SLR scenarios(as there is a range of and City's credit rating through changes in the ability to use SLR scenarios,we anticipate confirming the most relevant and develop property,the associated ability to generate scenario with the City)to define how the on-the-ground tax revenue--which could impact the City's ability to pay conditions that facilitate or hinder economic activity change existing and raise new debt,and the ability for residents based on the installation of stormwater infrastructure and business to access capital to support mortgages for improvements for a select group of elements.At a minimum, property purchases or access financing for improvements the five elements,or impact categories,listed below would to mitigate potential damages. be included to illustrate potential impacts on the City's property tax base.real estate market and financial mortgage However,it is important to note that a range of effects result cycles and City's credit rating,but could be expanded based from even something as simple as property damage,and on engagement with the City.These elements are organized by articulating the dependencies that ripple through the into three groups based on the how the Impact accrues in economy in the business case,a fuller picture of impacts relation to flooding and SLR. emerges.For this reason,although a pilot project at a neighborhood level would be a helpful first step toward a Damages:costs borne by people and property as a direct business case for infrastructure,a broader citywide analysis result of flooding and SLR. would be able to capture a broader range of real-world impacts and provide a fuller accounting of benefits resulting 1 Structure and Contents:Costs of damage to residential, from that infrastructure as well as a more complete picture commercial industrial,and public/institutional of the cost of inaction. buildings,their contents,as well as vehicles and any associated cleanup costs. The analysis would estimate impacts to the elements listed above in dollars and cents without any infrastructure 2 Area Infrastructure:Costs of damage to infrastructure improvements and with Infrastructure improvements,then for transportation.public streetscape.utilities,and these outcomes would be compared to define the value other Infrastructure. of risk reduction,or benefit,resulting from stormwater infrastructure Improvements.Key inputs that drive resulting First-Order Losses:costs caused by interruptions to estimates would be targeted to perform a sensitivity economic activity such as production and consumption. analysis that provides both a best and worst-case scenario in terms of Impacts and benefits.For example,the analysis 3 Business Effects:Costs from impacts on businesses would differentiate between the impacts in an event where damaged or whose function is impeded by flooding power is lost versus maintained for critical infrastructure and SLR,including interruption to business,lost wages. operation,such as pump stations.thatwould change business closure,and lost tax revenue. whether and how much properties were damaged in a 4 Traffic and Transit Disruption:Costs of travel delays combined storm and SLR event. to roadway and transit users.including business The time horizon for this analysis would be aligned with the customers and suppliers. lifetime of the Infrastructure that reduces risk in order to capture all benefits that would be provided,and would be Indirect Effects:costs to inter-Industry and societal discounted into present values to allow for comparison with relationships resulting from damages and first-order losses. investment costs in today's dollars.Even if not quantified in 5 Property Value:Loss in property value,which could the pilot analysis,it should be noted that investments that result from reduced ability to finance development,use reduce risk in one set of storm and SLR conditions will also of existing Improvements on parcels,and changes in reduce risk In other types of storm and SLR Conditions, highest and best use. though these residual benefits will vary in magnitude based on storm and SLR conditions. With this information.AECOM can also begin the development of a tool that allows decision-makers to communicate the costs and benefits of investments to important stakeholders,as well as what is at risk in the absence of Investment.AECOM has extensive experience in developing presentation materials for municipal audiences. such as utility,transportation and economic development agencies,as well as the public they serve. 74 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-K13 Page 154 Initial Planning &Design Public Safety M. Significantly Positive Revenue Potential i \ ©Positive / Community F5 t! , Economic Resilience ■Significantly / Negative ReturnInvestment on / 52 / `y`r • \ I Negative �,,„„ 07 0 \EEnergy 0 Neutral System 53 \ Resilience cm Not Applicable Operating I $$4 ' Costs/Savings I F2 I ,. 1 r-,Outage'.g I Performance '`" x � i Community Fl1. Education Capital Costs \ A' \ / and Access to / Clean Energy E2 El / Air Quality N / Climate/GHG Figure 2.Example Triple Bottom Line Output Chart for Resiliency Investment Assessment(Source.AECOM) APPROACH TO ONGOING ANALYSIS ground conditions that facilitate or hinder economic activity The ongoing analysis would leverage the expertise change with Investment decisions.Again,these models are developed through the pilot analysis,and would be designed to be transparent and nimble.and could be shared expanded to account for risks beyond those considered directly with the City,as needed. in the pilot analysis.For instance.losses to Miami Beach This iterative approach would provide the City with an residents and workers from lost wages and decreased estimate of the broader.Citywide business case for access to transportation.These additional loss parameters management of flooding and SLR that includes key will contribute to an understanding of the effects of flooding elements that economic activity relies upon,such as and SLR(and investments that help to mitigate these transportation networks.instead of a case Including only sources of risk)on the broader economic activity and damage to property and infrastructure without specific well-being resulting from real-world connections between accounting for how this damage can cascade through the people,property and infrastructure. economy.The scope of the risk reduction could also be expanded by the use of a triple bottom line style approach The full suite of elements described as damages,first- that also provides information on where the Impacts from order effects.and Indirect effects would be assessed(see investment and infrastructure accrue across society,the description of elements beginning on page 2).and additional environment,and government.Note that the property- elements of specific interest to stakeholders,such as based elements would still be used to understand the impacts to natural resources.could be included to ensure impact the City's property tax base,real estate market and that the analysis has accounted for key issues relevant to financial mortgage cycles and City's credit rating through City agencies,residents,and businesses.Note that the changes in the ability to use and develop property.the AECOM team would again use a combination of coastal associated ability to generate tax revenue--which could risk modeling and mapping,hydraulic and hydrological impact the City's ability to pay existing and raise new debt. modeling.GIS mapping,and locally relevant values for cost and the ability for residents and business to access capital accrual based on industry-leading methodologies accepted to support mortgages for property purchases.The analysis by agencies such as FEMA,USAGE,and FHWA,to populate would still include these elements,but expand on them to transparent,locally relevant models that define how on-the- develop an economy-wide business case. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 7S RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 155 In addition to stormwater infrastructure investments,other In this case,the analysis and tool will be developed In a types of investments,such as other types of infrastructure, manner that informs the City how costs and benefits from programs and policies,and projects could be assessed risk reduction accrue in the short term(5 years).middle for their ability to reduce risk.Note that some other term(10-20 years),and long term(30+years).By examining common types of investments that protect the human different timelines.AECOM seeks to provide the City with environment from flooding and SLR.such as seawalls. an understanding of the timing of costs and benefits that These environmental impacts that should be accounted for can be used to plan a capital program or develop another either through valuation of ecosystem services or a triple type of funding strategy to implement the infrastructure, bottom line approach.That would provide the broadest view programs and projects being examined as we have for other of impacts under inaction and risk reduction by including government and private clients. impacts that may not be feasible or desirable to assess In monetary terms due to budgetary and/or data constraints. Once the extent of the analysis is defined based on consultation with the City and a presentation of options to the City from the AECOM team,the analysis will proceed to estimate Impacts to the elements listed above in dollars and cents without any infrastructure improvements and with infrastructure improvements,then these would be compared to define the value of risk reduction,or benefit, resulting from infrastructure,program,and/or project investment.Key inputs that drive resulting estimates would undergo sensitive analysis that provides fora best and worst-case scenario in terms of impacts and benefits. % SOUTHWEST BROOKLYN TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE 1++'......, ® o The TOL performance summaries show three density sceneries for ilea n""""� Hook evaluated under social.eeoironmental.and financial criteria. ii_—a. s. N1'• .ml.d..a.�uAUME M�.,.a.wcwa�tlw lelr.oewu ',.90M ee2eeere Arntafl. .aerM -- cuiW a.r9.auWr.Maa.hrme nMre+e r.M • .y.t-rq.itn.nn u n.a Existing Condition 25M SOFT 35M SOFT 45M SOFT ti , :. ' 44.. . '''....,:41,10 '•‘....,st..>4A_ ofrici•;4 Figure 3.Example TBL Output for Development Decision-Making(Source.AECOM) 76 AECOM RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 156 DATA NEEDS There are a broad range of data sources that can support the estimation of economic impacts to buildings, Infrastructure,critical facilities,businesses,populations and recreational and natural resources.Our Economics team has a strong understanding of these data inputs. including standardized values developed by the USACE and FEMA,as well as inputs that more closely reflect conditions in the study area developed during AECOM's extensive work in the Miami region(including the data collected during development of the City's ADAPT database)on the interaction between development and the impacts of a changing climate on the City over the last several decades.AECOM's team will evaluate relevant information resources,incorporate fieldwork and expertjudgement as needed,and recommend additional areas where data could be developed to ensure the best available information is incorporated in the analysis.At project initiation,AECOM will review existing data and identify any data gaps.This review will include physical modeling inputs such as topographic data,and H&H data,engineering specifications of critical infrastructure.building/facility footprints,as well as key economic and financial data including tax assessor records, business and sales tax receipts,economic development forecasts and municipal debt and insurance portfolios. BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF MIAMI STORMWATER RESILIENCY PROGRAM 77 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 157 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 158 Int U*11111 111 r ��:.� Mt-•rrporTurq t a- _ ,kft A. .� ■'. e 1VlS ♦ r _�.: " a 7! n=_ jgr 1• wr lie ille IIII t f( int 1. .2. I 7' c ...lir , r _t. T rrr , r L '',,P t.�r III IF Tr 'MI It ii R}' ' 1 H - f Ir .• if t J♦:.->1r R_-..111.`1 - 1 i i37 W A - AAA, III IWY�""' i:c� urf:: :::: U Alli -, i .4- . 1 •'' 127111.11"1"11 l ■i f tin I.. LI.. 11 I l i II I .. 40a • Ir — l Y N Irk xms 14 Mil ♦ •t .. • ' -Ar•rele-`-x0 - . v.•• Si 4 About AECOM •..., =-4'E...t ® i AECOM is built to deliver a better world.We design.build, <__ 1fli nce and operate infrastructure assatstorgovemmert ,•(-' .•,r A il Y • businesses and organize Ions in more than 15O col ntties.As. , y _ r--, , a fully Integrated firm.we connect knowledge and experience w!- across our global network of experts to help clients solve - '• m -- -- - - -�' -•--i- their most complex challenges.From high-performance + • buildings and in frastructure,to resilient communities and ° +J,. environments,to stable and secure nations,our work is I `�� transformative,differentiated and vital,A Fortune 500 flr'm, AECOM had revenue of approximately$17.4 billion during S. fiscal year 2016.See how we deliver what others can only e ik imagine at aeconicom and @AECOM R .- - •" • AECOM T Y 1 .5'- [ �+..i' � •1 'i•^ BOO South D��}}}IIIglas Road, - . s• , 2^°Flgee.Nor t¢Tower �`t Y / ' '-ipul" ` _ Coral Gables,kL 33134n ' ter T 305.444 46B1 4.w A• .'lttxt.A7?'t1 - .L..% --.........-,.-,..•---.._....4 • RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 159 Detail by Entity Name Page 1 of 3 Florida Department of State DIV:stON OF CORPORATIONS t r • 9 P4+ 6'y *eft "..Y;S d++....t• Deparlmont ofstate /Drvnion of Gorporanons /Search Records / Delelt By Document Number I Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES,INC Flinn Information Document Number F95000004014 FEI/EIN Number 95-2661922 Date Filed 08/21/1995 State CA Status ACTIVE Last Event NAME CHANGE AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 12/04/2008 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 300 South Grand Avenue 9th Floor Los Angeles,CA 90071 Changed'04/13/2017 Mailing Address 300 South Grand Avenue 9th Floor Los Angeles,CA 90071 Changed 04/13/2017 Registered Agent Name&Address C T CORPORATION SYSTEM 1200 SOUTH PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION,FL 33324 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title Treasurer Aga.Anshooman 1999 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2600 Los Angeles,CA 90067-6033 Title Director,Secretary http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 12/4/2017 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 160 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 3 Hopson,Preston Go AECOM 555 S.Flower Street Suite 3700 Los Angeles,CA 90071 Title CEO,President,Director Keener,Timothy H 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Morrisville,NC 27560 Title Director Gan.David Y 1999 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2600 • Los Angeles,CA 90067 Title VP Cohen,Howard 605 Third Ave New York,NY 10158 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2015 04/21/2015 2016 04/18/2016 2017 04/13/2017 Document Images ilartl'2017--ANNA'REPORT Vew image n PDF format 041&2018--ANNUAL REPORT View image on POP format 12/13!2015--AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image m PDF tonal 07/21,2015-AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT l View image in POF formal 05/27/2015-AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF brmel 05'21/2015-AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image n POE banal 04/21/2015-ANNUAL REPORT View image m PDF formal 04/30/2014--ANNUAL REPORT View image in POE banal 04/30/2013-ANNUAL REPORT View Enrage In PDF format 07./02,2012-ANNUAL REPORT View image n PDF brine! 04/14,2012-ANNUAL REPORT [_ View/mage in POE format 00100!2011-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 01107/2011--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 0&19/2010.-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 02/18/2010--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 10/29/2009--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 1027:2009--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format http://searc h.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchRe sultDetail?inq ui rytyp e=Entity... 12/4/2017 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 161 Detail by Entity Name Page 3 of 3 1&23/2009-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2009-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 12/22'2008--Dom.Foc AR View image in PDF formal 12/04/2008--Name Chi View image in PDF format 0430/2008-ANNUAL REPORT View image in POE format 04/1072007-ANNUAL REPORT View image a PDF formal 04/27,2006-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 0415,2005-ANNUAL REPORT View image in POE formal 0414/2004-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF turmel 0422'2003-ANNUAL REPORT View image n PDF formal 04110/2003-ANNUAL REPORT View mane in PDF tonna) 0620/2002-ANNUAL REPORT View ming,in PDF fennel OV 10/2001-- ANNUALBIEORT I View image in POE format 05/01,2000--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 03/041999-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF formal 01/30/1998-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/30/1997-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08/09/1996-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/15/1996-ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 08'2111995-DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO 1997 View image in PDF format Pio..o.uan-.nr a sue.0a,:r;a,m cauaRia/. http:/;search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 12/4/2017 RFQ-2017-300-KB Page 162