Loading...
RESOLUTION 92-20471 . RESOLUTION 92-20471 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA, CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING BOARD ON THE FOLLOWING: AMENDMENT TO THE MAP OF ZONING ORDINANCE 89-2665 BY DOWN— ZONING LOTS 27-34 OF BLOCK 15—A, ISLAND VIEW ADDITION FROM THE RM-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY HIGH INTENSITY DISTRICT AND INCLUDE SAID PROPERTY IN THE RM-1, MULTIPLE FAMILY LOW INTENSITY DISTRICT SAID LOTS OWNED BY YACHT CLUB SOUTHEASTERN, INC. , (A/K/A SUNSET HARBOR) . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT, WHEREAS, the Planning Board of the City of Miami Beach held a pubic hearing on February 24 , 1992 and continued the meeting on March 9, 1992 and voted to recommend in favor of an amendment to the Zoning Map of Zoning Ordinance 89-2665; and, WHEREAS, said recommended amendment to the Zoning Map would delete lots 27-34 of Block 15-A, Island View Addition from the RM- 3 , Multiple Family High Intensity District and include said property in the RM-1, Multiple Family Low Intensity District; and, WHEREAS, said action of the Planning Board has been duly transmitted to the City Commission pursuant to Section 14 , entitled "Changes and Amendments" of Zoning Ordinance No. 89-2665, and Section 14 requires that a public hearing be held by the City Commission to hear the Planning Board' s recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that a public hearing for consideration of the aforementioned amendment to the Zoning Map of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby called to be held before the City Commission in its chambers on the Third Floor of City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida June 3 , 1992 , beginning at 5:01 P.M. and the City clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish appropriate Public Notice of the said Public Hearing in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Miami Beach, at which time and place all interested parties will be heard. Ai( � PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of Mari , 1992 . (OFr / / MAYOR ATTEST: 1 c \t) ' -L ` ` CITY CLERK commisn\res1099 . 92 FORM APPROVED LEGAL DEPT. Date 3- 12-1L - _ - ._ _� " F - .A +.mow. b. ►.:z ': ..^.' - ;n,;-' .-.,1''.. • • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Ad. CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA 33139 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TELEPHONE: (305) 673-7010 FAX: (305) 673-7782 COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 4/V • DATE: MARCH 18, 1992 TO: Mayor Seymour Gelber and Members of the City Commission drPizr:%. FROM: Carla Bernabei Talarico �r City Manager SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE MAP OF ZONING ORDINANCE 89-2665 BY DOWN- ZONING THAT PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY YACHT CLUB SOUTHEASTERN,INC.,(A/K/A SUNSET HARBOR)FROM RM-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY,HIGH INTENSITY DISTRICT,TO RM-2,MULTI-FAMILY MEDIUM INTENSITY DISTRICT, OR RM-1, MULTI-FAMILY LOW INTENSITY DISTRICT, OR TH, TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR A COMBINATION THEREOF/PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REQUEST The Administration is requesting consideration of an amendment to the official Zoning Map of Zoning Ordinance 89-2665 by down-zoning that parcel of land owned by Yacht Club Southeastern,Inc.,(a/k/a Sunset Harbor)from RM-3(Multiple Family,High Intensity District), to RM-2 (Multiple Family, Medium Intensity District) or to RM-1 (Multiple Family, Low Intensity District) or to TH (Townhome Residential District) or a combination thereof. The Planning and Zoning Department has prepared the analysis, contained herein, which examines the zoning history of the subject property and the surrounding area,the actions taken by various City entities, an analysis of the existing conditions and the alternatives for future development patterns based on different zoning classifications. The underlying basis for conducting this analysis is the request by the City Commission for the Administration and staff to review the City's zoning classification of the entire property in question and particularly that area adjacent to the canal. It should be noted that the Homeowner's Association of the Sunset Islands is challenging, in the courts, the validity of the Building Permit issued for the three tower, 800 unit development on the site in question. BACKGROUND Zoning History The below table illustrates the different zoning classifications on the subject property from 1934 to the present. It is interesting to note that that portion of Sunset Island #4 adjacent to the canal was originally zoned as a business district. It was zoned for small apartment buildings from 1939 to 1945 at which time it was zoned as a single family district. Year Sunset Harbour Site Sunset Island #4 Area East of Sunset (area adjacent to canal) Harbour Site 1934 B-D: Business B-D: Business District; B-B: Business District; Commercial Commercial and Multi- District; Commercial and Multi-family family and Multi-family 1939 B-D: Business R-DE: Restricted B-B/RE: Business District; Commercial Multi-family District District/ Multi- and Multi-family family District 01 1 AGENDA • ITEM DATE w/ gas _ ,. 'tom •. �..- _ `•� .. .�-_ .P r.�• +�.' t`•Y�-::..s:�+ a.' .a -�.•- �� � : �Fi: � ..�:-s�!ti-c•.^:�••�i ti,,, - - _ .i„ �y %. • •t'•�•-^ .-��•, t ...-. "Z.:.M-'�._."� .. wa•.ti+Y.W.sy':.....r6-111."...r�X:dsi ..... ...:...Aru.I.rn-ku:nias.ii.+.w...s..:.aY7de-.. __ :..Jl.....s.r... ,.:., _-_..r -- .!' i - -... �- _ _>.....ray.........�__-.......rrw.rw..�.�...ia.. ..,_...�...r�.�.-....�..._ rte-._ __ ........ r • Year Sunset Harbour Site Sunset Island #4 Area East of Sunset (area adjacent to canal) Harbour Site 4 1945 B-D: Business R-D: Single Family B-B/RE: Business District; Commercial District District/ Multi- and Multi-family family District 1947 B-D: Business R-D: Single Family B-B/BC: Business District; Commercial District Districts and Multi-family 1958 B-D: Business R-D: Single Family BC: Business District; Commercial District Districts and Multi-family 1971 C-4: Business District; RS-4: Single Family C-6: Intensive Commercial and District Commercial; light Multi-family industrial uses 1989 RM-3: Multi-family RS-4: Single Family CD-2/I-1: High Intensity District Commercial Medium District Intensity/Light Industrial District • Definition of Districts B-D - Allowed for all types of residential uses and all commercial uses except certain heavy industry uses. No setback requirements for lot abutting a waterway or street. No density or floor area requirements. B-B - Same as B-D District except commercial uses slightly more restricted. R-DE - Allowed for apartment buildings (of no more than four units), two family dwellings, bungalows (two or more could occupy one lot), and single family dwellings. No density or floor area requirements. R-E - Allowed for all types of residential uses, including hotels, private clubs, etc. No density or floor area requirements. R-D - Allowed single family dwellings and municipal uses. B-C - Same as B-C but allows for more intensive uses. No density or floor area requirements. C-4 - Allowed for any residential uses, all neighborhood commercial uses, cabarets and nightclubs. Maximum density equals 125 units per acre and the maximum Floor Area Ratio equals 10.0. RS-4 - Allows single family dwellings and municipal uses.C-6 - All commercial uses allowed, including light industry. No residential uses are permitted. RM-3 - Allows for any residential use, including hotels. Maximum Floor Area Ratio for lots greater than 75,000 square feet is 6.0. CD-2 - Allows commercial uses, apartments and hotels. Maximum Floor Area Ratio is 2.0. I-1 - Allows for light industrial uses. No residential uses are permitted. 1928 Purdy Avenue -- Chronology of Events May 10, 1985 City Attorney issues opinion that the docks remain a valid Non-conforming Use. June 10, 1985 Dade County exempts the Yacht Club project from the County's Shoreline Development Ordinance. Sept 24, 1985 Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Marina; deferred to October 24, 1985. Oct 24, 1985 Planning Board approves request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Marina with dockmaster,with 10 conditions,one requiring Design Review Board approval for upland building if different from the Yacht Club plans. Assistant City Attorney gives opinion that Planning Board cannot regulate upland development. Nevertheless, the applicant agrees to submit upland development for approval by the Design Review Board if the project is different from the Yacht Club Development. Nov 20, 1985 City Commission approves Marina (Memo 675-85) as recommended by the Planning Board. May 5, 1986 Building Permit issued for new seawall. 2 02 •�„ �'� "a .w .'.#• , .. ,?:. .. .l;► r;!fir-.. t. —_t.l• •rt4r' R,d.,; T;..1i._ . , _.._.•, _ _ t ._. "'w,. - .. -._ ►' . „Yy7....s..-•+•w-,in..... _. —�'.�r:i�t.iC.wdw%6Y:.i, '"'OYL�wfiiew'yd•4►ir•:ss+cr.L9dy:ai:y..r. :�v. ..�...Y.fYJs-".,' siir.Gvw.rrrirr •. .. -.ra...+..rrr+.r+... .�w. • • • • May 27, 1986 Planning Board grants a six (6) month Extension of Time in order to obtain a Building Permit for the Marina and the dockmaster building. June 26, 1986 Two minor amendments to Marina Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Board. Amendments related to the applicant placing (in escrow account) the balance of the play equipment costs and installing it by August 15, 1986 and the submittal of a landscape plan for entire property, including the residential buildings when constructed. Aug 5, 1986 "Stipulation" (Marina Conditional Use Permit) recorded in Circuit Court, as required by the Planning Board's conditions; twelve (12) conditions listed (10 from October 24, 1985 and two more from June 26, 1986.) Aug 14, 1986 Building Permit issued for construction of Marina with 152 slips and parking areas. Sept 4, 1986 Extension of time approved by Planning Board in order to install playground equipment by September 30, 1986. Dec 5, 1986 Minor amendment approved regarding Marina site plan: moved the center pier north of its permitted location and the southerly pier moved 50 feet north of permitted location. July 29, 1987 "Modification to Stipulation"(Marina Conditional Use Permit)filed with Circuit Court pertaining to dock locations decided on December 5, 1986. Aug 3, 1987 Two (2) amendments to the Marina Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Board: Reducing slips from 152 to 125 including 17 parallel dockage along the north side; also relocating dockmaster's building and parking lot. Nov 18, 1987 Building permit issued for dockmaster building and parking area. Jan 27, 1988 Request for extension of time of Conditional Use Marine Permit approved in order to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy. Jan 29, 1988 Building Permit issued for new roof of dockmaster. Apr 5, 1988 Design Review Board reviewed project(3 towers,one facing Sunset Island). Sub- committee created(Giller,Tilden,Rosenberg)by Board with delegated authority for preliminary review. Apr 29, 1988 Design Review Board Sub-Committee granted preliminary approval of project (File #1232) including three (3) buildings. May 3, 1988 Neon sign mounted on east wall of dockmaster building approved as per Building Permit #32280 July 12, 1988 Design Review Board granted final design approval of three (3) buildings (File #1232 & 1232A). Aug 10, 1988 Dade County Shoreline Committee approved the project with three(3)buildings. Their review was required as the project was determined to be substantially different than the Yacht Club Development which was exempted from County review on June 10, 1985. Dec 6, 1988 Building Permit applied for 3 towers, 800 units. Dec 14, 1988 Building Permit issued for dock foundation. June 1, 1989 Building Permit issued for three (3) buildings, 800 units. Aug 15, 1989 Building Permit issued for the construction of a sales center. Sept 20, 1989 Design Review Board Chairman and Planning and Zoning Director approve relocation of Building #1 (Facing Sunset Island) further west towards the Bay and relocation of tennis courts to east of building #1 towards the side lot line near the lumberyard property. Sept 21, 1989 Planning and Zoning Department design staff approve plans for project. 3 03 s- r _ _ - _ _.:- t; _ as---• '+_-► -f.'t _ __ - •1 f.•.rt•, - - a. w-. .�.I.=i. f . �.lw^ �'t:4:.rF:- ..' - -..•.W[.�•[.i.....I..wiw:.tiY..'- ....-.• :.....s..v...-.re- ..e'i.r:.r.._.:..'.ti.I.-..".+w-Y.w».ar+..�.L i-:.....::..A...J.4.4......wt'.,......I:..+.... ..a.:erC...rx..u..i..Y 4.r..-a........n.F_.Lr wtr..<.a.+..r...w..re.F�r Y _____ ,.. .r•e .r.r.... ._.. .r �._..+.».. , Sept 22, 1989 Building Permit issued for the construction of a temporary parking lot. Sept 27, 1989 Planning and Zoning Department staff approve revised plans which now includes zoning approval for the entire project. Feb 2, 1990 Design Review Board Chairman and Planning and Zoning Director approve additional five levels on north building #1 (4 residential and 1 parking) and other decorative revisions. Feb 7, 1990 Planning and Zoning Director meets with Andy Moriber, Attorney for Sunset Islands Association and homeowner on Sunset #2) and Bill Ingraham (President of Sunset Homeowner Assoc.). Project explained, variances reviewed, Board of Adjustment and Design Review appeal process discussed including the process to appeal the February 2, 1990 Design Review decision. Mr.Moriber was advised that the appeal must be filed by December 20 in order to be heard on March 13, 1990 meeting. Feb 9, 1990 Zoning Board of Adjustment File No. 2077: applicant requested variances for temporary sales signs and one (1) for parking aisle width, ornamental concrete feature (rear facing Bay) and the other for the width of the porte-cocheres in front of each of the three buildings. Applicant withdraws building related variances and Board approves temporary sales sign requests. Mar 13, 1990 Application submitted to the Design Review Board modifying building No. 1 by adding four levels of units and one level of parking, with no increase in total number of units. Applicant requests deferral to April 17, 1990, meeting. Mar 20, 1990 Applicant withdraws application to modify building removing the four additional residential floors and the one floor of parking. Therefore the Director's and Chairman's action taken on February 2, 1990 is no longer applicable, no further Design Review Board action is required. Apr 5, 1990 Shoreline Review Committee considers plans that show the relocation of the north building (building No. 1) 152 feet to the west. Action is deferred pending clarification report from the City of Miami Beach. Apr 26, 1990 Shoreline Review Committee approves (5-3) project site plan contingent upon a $150,000 contribution for landscape improvements to Island View Park. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS Land Use Description This "L" shaped parcel of land is for the most part vacant. It is the site of a 125 slip marina and its associated parking lot. On the north-west corner of the site is the dockmaster's building, associated support structures, a sales center and a swimming pool. The following is a legal description of the property: Lots 27 - 40, Block 15-A, Island View Addn. as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 144 and lots 10-11 Block 15, Island View Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 6, page 115. (1816-1940 Purdy Avenue and 1301-1425 20th Street) Zoning Classifications (RM-2, RM-1, TH) The following table illustrates the impact on development that the existing and proposed zoning classifications have on this site. We have calculated the number of units for the entire site as well as separating the parcel into two sites for purposes of determining a possible combination of zoning districts (see map). • 4 �1 �4 • • • ZONING ENTIRE SITE AREA ADJACENT AREA ADJACENT CLASSIFICATION (277,432 SQ.FT) TO CANAL TO BAY (104,000 SQ.FT.) (173,432 SQ.FT.) TH 187 UNITS 70 UNITS 117 UNITS RM-1 402 UNITS 150 UNITS 252 UNITS RM-2 605 UNITS 227 UNITS 378 UNITS RM-3 1053 UNITS 395 UNITS 658 UNITS The above examples are based on the following assumptions: The average unit size for a development in each of the districts is 1,100. The FAR has been calculated with the following design bonuses: TH - 0.99; RM-1 - 2.0; RM- 2 - 3.0; RM-3 - 5.22. Multi-Family buildings (RM-1,2 and 3) will have 20% of the gross area as common space. It is important to note that the proposed development of Sunset Harbour at 800 units under the current Building Permit is less intense than what is permitted under the existing zoning classification. Level Of Service (LOS) The Levels of Service, and hurricane evacuation issues have all been analyzed by the City, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the State's Department of Community Affairs by way of approval of the City's Comprehensive Plan. It has already been determined that any development under the RM-3 zoning district would not have an adverse effect on the established Levels of Service; therefore, any down-zoning of the property should likewise have no adverse effect in LOS. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS As viewed by the Planning & Zoning Department, the underlying issue involved in this down-zoning request is the juxtaposition of the High Intensity Multi-Family District in very close proximity to a single family district, separated by only a 100 foot wide canal. It is clear that to minimize the impact of any development on the subject site an effective low-rise buffer must be created. This would best be achieved by placing a height restriction on that portion of the development adjacent to the canal. Their analysis would indicate that a combination of zoning districts on this site could achieve the purpose of creating a low-rise development along the canal while at the same time maintaining an overall site density that approximates the development project which is currently under permit. The dividing line for these two districts could be just east of the existing upland improvements already in place (see aerial photograph), including the existing recreational structures and pool. It is the City's understanding that this area is the designated view corridor as required by the Shore Line Review Committee and thus ensures that low rise development in this area will remain. The inclusion of this portion of the site with the area to the south would enable the developer to achieve a maximum FAR density. It is critical to note that if the building permit is found to be valid by the appropriate ruling body, there is nothing in the Ordinance to prevent the applicant to continue with the existing plans. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommended that the subject property be rezoned into two classifications. The area fronting the bay, including the existing structures should remain RM-3, Multi-Family High Intensity. This zoning classification is consistent with all of the other multi-family districts fronting Biscayne Bay from 6th Street through 20th Streets. The area adjacent to the canal, east of the existing structures and along 20th Street was recommended to be zoned either TH, Townhome Residential or RM-1, Multi-Family Low Intensity. It was recommended, further, that if the RM-1 zoning district is determined by the Board to be the appropriate alternative, it should be done so in tandem with recommendations to amend the development regulations of this district in order to encourage townhome development. 5 . �•~ys;l.i�+-.'�`Jsiw R .`�- -" i...•"..,•• '. i �?'t. .. �`,.. , s;.4 '-:R..;,.• I. i_ ,_-'! „r,r ., ,•s.Cs,:•'�. 4 '.�. .. ♦w. - r � 7. . . • •1. _ l'/ . - ..._ .r.lJ' ... ... ...r.Y....a. ....:...._ rw 4::};l:a..a.rLI.1'---..'.A+........r.......y. - _ ;lirp _- •{.Y. - __�f.i•.aiA+"� .r...__ ___ r..._...-. - . r_ __ _... thy..- C_ _ _...._.,._.J:-Irt...!w..;... .._»..i7P-_- L'w'.li.r`-YSA.Ji.J..r.'.�Y+t.L.ar'•+e.Lt\a%✓..S+.w,......_...^....G.... .r . f _ Examining the table on the previous page, the combination of the RM-3 an TH zoning classifications could yield a development of 728 units; the combination of RM-3 and RM-1 (with a height restriction) could yield a development of 808 units. Either re-zoning scenario was recommended to enable the developer to maintain an overall density similar to that which is already permitted, but limit the height of the structures along the canal. The Department argued that rezoning would provide an equitable solution. REVIEW CRITERIA BY PLANNING BOARD OF A PETITION FOR AMENDING THE ORDINANCE Under Section 14-2,E of the Zoning Ordinance, it states that in reviewing a request for an amendment, the Planning Board shall consider thirteen review criteria, when applicable. The following are the review criteria and the response to each: 1. Whether the proposed change is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any applicable neighborhood or Redevelopment Plans; The State Department of Community Affairs has given a preliminary opinion that his down-zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and would not require an amendment; the Planning and Zoning Department concurs with this opinion. 2. Whether the proposed change would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent or nearby districts; The proposed TH or RM-1 districts would not be unrelated to adjacent districts as this area would act as a transitional zone between the Single Family District and the Commercial and Industrial districts and the High Intensity Multi-Family District to the south. 3. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the City; The down-zoning of the area adjacent to the canal would bring the site more into scale with the adjacent Single Family neighborhood. Furthermore, the maximum FAR for the Industrial District is 1.0 and for the Commercial District the maximum FAR is 2.0; thus a potential FAR between 1.0 and 2.0 would be in scale with these adjacent districts. 4. Whether the proposed change would-tax the existing load on public facilities and infrastructure; There is no evidence that any down-zoning of this property would be a detriment on public facilities and infrastructure. 5. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change; The juxtaposition of the High Intensity Multi-Family district adjacent to a - single family district would be mitigated if that portion of the site adjacent to the canal was down-zoned. 6. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary; Recent actions of the Planning Board and the City Commission have stressed the importance of the integrity of Single Family districts in Miami Beach as witnessed by amending the Zoning Ordinance with regard to the lot split review process and the down-zoning of certain single family areas. The Administration is re-evaluating all new development and the affect it may have on single family districts. The importance of maintaining the City's Single Family districts is a policy of the Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan. 7. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; The proposed down-zoning will not have an adverse effect on the living conditions of the neighborhood. 6 � 06 ._.........s.d.1..:r....r _._-.-.ter..-.x...�....__. ---_...;.:s:..w+r.;,r...... -..... ". ...-._.-.._..,_,+.._ .w................r.« _...,..._..._..-wa+on...._..........x.-. -....._ i..i.w.e..�...._.... _' � -....-� .-... ►....- - _...__._......-........1 • • 8. Whether the proposed change.will create or excessively increase traffic congestion beyond the Levels of Service as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan or otherwise affect public safety; Any down-zoning of the site will not affect the LOS established for the area. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; The proposed down-zoning, whether it be TH or RM-1 (especially if the district regulations are amended to include a height restriction), would improve light and air circulation to the adjoining areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; The resulting site development from a change in zoning should have a beneficial effect on all surrounding districts. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the Improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; The proposed down-zoning will not have a negative effect on the potential development of the commercial or industrial areas. 12. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; Implied by this review is the analysis of an upzoning request; since this request involves down-zoning, this criteria is not applicable. 13. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the City for the proposed use in a district already permitting such use. This review criteria is not applicable to this situation. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Planning Board held its public hearing on this matter on February 24, 1992, but deferred a decision until March 9 due to the late hour and the expressed desire to review the materials provided to them during the hearing. After due deliberation, the Board voted 4-3 to approve a motion recommending the following: 1. Lots 10, 11 and 35 through 39 be maintained under the current zoning classification of RM-3. 2. Lots 27-34 be re-zoned to RM-1. 3. A companion amendment to the Zoning Ordinance be considered for adoption at the Board's next meeting, limiting the maximum building height to 40 ft. for properties adjacent to a waterway or body of water in the RM-1 District. 4. A caveat that the Commission be fully apprised of the litigation involving the property in question and the legal implications (if any) to the City if it proceeds with the down-zoning. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, the Administration concurs with the Planning Board recommendation. Accordingly, it is recommending that the Commission set the public hearing date for the down-zoning of Lots 27-34 of that parcel of land owned by Yacht Club Southeastern, Inc. (a/k/a Sunset Harbor) for its meeting of June 3, 1992. It is expected that the Planning Board will have held a public hearing on its proposed companion legislation on maximum building height by that date and both items can be scheduled for a concurrent First Reading by the Commission. The following is a tentative schedule of dates regarding this matter: 7 --•:.Jr.+'_ .• R^•.� - _.. i;,r4_ .,.r+�+5-.. -..�-- _r-`r-:1�.7..' .... - 1 _ ' _. _r'..'�.. -a'?. - _., ...- '.'t'^- r', - -, - :2 ...r _. r.___ _. .. • April 1 City Commission requested by Administration to set a public hearing date on down-zoning for June 3 (Note: the Zoning Ordinance requires prior thirty (30) days advertised and mailed notice for a hearing on this type of amendment). April 21 Planning Board holds public hearing on companion zoning amendment limiting the maximum height of buildings on waterfront properties in the RM-1 District to forty (40) feet. May 6 Commission set concurrent public hearing on the building height amendment for June 3. (Note: This type of amendment requires public notice to be advertised a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing). June 3 Commission holds public hearing (First Reading) on the two amendments. June 17 Commission holds public hearing (Second Reading) on the two amendments. June 27 If adopted, the two amendments become effective as law. CBT:DJG:JGG:jm Attachment commisn\1099.92 8 8 . .• .• • • • . • • fiti • • .rA 0 I Ili l 4114 . .. • ip t ? "&'; i •CI _ ti._6hi . \.1 • 'S . a S.I s.I • . # ciit$1.11io .. yof: is SI , it . . . Alik • . .., • -011,... goINA • • '''...%. VII • 4 N 4,„,...t.w. .saiiiiin: i 4 7 diall 111, p. _ % ,- • eg• ire- ,'Ill 111 , ,- ' -.-4.....--tog ...-.., ..--- -az -'--- - • ... ..., IL.. 'ill lir. Ill_ :I I! .. . _ii.a. .1:"4 .• • ,J.,- ........ n se --.-.:,-1:..-14 • . -*--9- ....:, _ - z....,, 5_-_. or . . .r...7,,,,,. .,•... . A ,' • - , - . . _ .. _ , 41 ' . ...... :.,, -- • _.....,1*-.. .-li- -••••• kow., .. i ij _I 1,; P A 4°11' • • .-- ii i-do.1 •. . •.• • .!: It ,ski. -,, • •' -*Crif .... • k..! ' : - • - a - . P.'. .. .• . Inie • ,..... •,• , .a . 7:-......:- .ffar ' fill=r11 . . ,• . - • II. .. ..i. ••..,." jr1Z,1 pit; -"if.-j--gmet--.---. .: i/ .. 7 -.4.•.... 404 . .4.." 7 i i• 1 04 1 ' :.: 1 .i 1 _ -......_ •..... - s - MMIIIIII ;•Pri...*;- -17777-Apr ..i.....j - .. -- ‘4". --* - If .. Lit...., 3 - P •- o "_ . ..., ......,-e, i wif.,,i, a-, ..- ; , I li lib. gill /.. ,)._ _.ta ' ' f :i .. ..!--•_ - , . -r. - •• ,11 ' . s4„LI _,.. •"0%.' '. '--' -1114 I •I t- -e ii7 WI ''' 'el:-I.I •- /.-...,II_ .:. . .i. ,e . ... •_- 4.111 „.,..i.• , . -...1 .''. Z. . k - .•.., , I i, •-,',17214• - - -- •ii it•, ' f • ....t- j 7 . . ' - - u. as - • r •• ,. 1, . . , z. . ....... .. . . -- . - -., - .- •' i 4170Arl 1 .AP .\a' .." 3gle a-- -•••-.• . ... .) )„.....•-• , j MIR • %i . i .• • , - ' - 1 i 1 i• • - ' ISE , % A . . .. - --- - • . :.e VI in- • ... IlErr---/."-- . .... ,. _ 4 It r-ei: -.,.• . ..,--,---7-4-!.., ..).tirr. - •r r ‘,..., I firgag4.,23 ..&,. •se Ilk It*1 o-• • . ___......-41,-•,..§71r it,....•••-.../_-.. ;•; '‘....e. • i 2 e - •_ .a. ii • ity X,- .. ' • • 1011111:,.. ! i'-__. _ .. .., • '1 • ' - • -. - . , .. ..-• -, ......„ 106 .• ,:`, • ,.'' . 4.-- . 1 Ir . N• \ ...: li \ . A- - 4 - '---•- . /' r .. - - • 7/So ,o ,,z, , P . ILI .- ." ' '- NIA--- ii • _ .1 'f • 4 AP -' ..-...„‘_-•••-. ; . "I'lb' ••11/4 0-4. 4. ,A, • _ ...„0-• --- """ .- a - .•. ..- .. . _ -•"4.1,,, lir,' de....„,—,;•.--A.....7...4,__ . ...--.:0 1._ .10" I 1::roo"")" ,. t ..• . ,I. ...gag • 4;.1;,-.":" . ..--7 T ." , ,1 • . , , .... ...aro..... .„0.0 .Af 4-1 •,, • it ' 1: 1 i _.,. m..t ....„ .. 1St 3 ... . . • - t -,,, ii9: i,I , : MP aii, io,,L. Of f •' 1 leif ..: '"‘.. , .. . - . V:. 4.7 t , •• p• . .. - ..•..t.3111, - -.IN , . ., i I .MP'• ,- ,. - ._ lin '-, ! 1 .a•U , i . .., II .. .At tit. Ira • • ' 7- .. ...,7„... IN, la ............=...j, ...._,.. ....4.,..- . ..... . T.. . . •, , ,i 4- -•-*-----..* . .. .,• -...,, ...., .......,:,....„ ..,,,,,,- ..,,,,.. .I• ,., . le...... • I 1 .. . . --•-•••••-4,1 \ 2-...:0 I 1' "wil: 1 Agilli: '. •1 iii.i. . ._ . .,.... . . . , ILL .so !‘ 4111 :: a 33 a lirr • . MO . , ' . _ .',1 _ It 1. •1 f g I ii, 1 _A tialiiii,'----.I-• I 171 L -:* i . i '- . (-4• : • i .•-.. - .".4). ", -. ..N. i .1, • :-.? • I i • -" 'K.** . . - ;20 i • -- - - V ;lift :;.1 ., I_ _ • • --,.."-----it‘;-•op ,. ‘11r*1110 i I A I' • - , ) ' . e., g j;• . ft-3...1 4 v-..:1'_ i . ,. 4., ( .4010- gli Ir., 1.•' ' "." •• ilk ..• • •A - ..%. q. 1111111 1 t iv:... a • • PURDY AVENUE . • AERIAL MAP ..: 09 • ' ���9 .. 2 e 1 i ' .71,!: 1 - t . Q- •. . JTRfET �.. Q ir r r• w �!.l1� • 1«�. �:•�• IE ' lel a N.7 ki NI ZS:Po* , • _ 4.b , 1 . luilkNift.,...-..... 0 ti !..t i,,,,,, 171:1 . .T.. ..._»..... . • ,;: . 4,1. .,,, ,. ,.. „ > . N. - • -- , -5.. . ,Cce. 4..,o "...,, 3 . - ,. 4 Ar:21CZi 7 z I ; • ,, v i • y .,.,,, .., •!' ''► 2/ ST?f4T +r mss., 3 IllikCY ''''w - k•t -1L-",, rl- C__. 7 pis 4`^'? iJ i E[�� .y -11 1, �';_3-q sliActer . - , QI L _- _ -_ - $ -- AREA PROPOSED TO BE - .- - - --— --- DOWN-ZONED TO RM-1 1.1 issoll skploi o•!oliviimi a ille1.!•1•11�A:I! I _-- \ •, .-..:.-.....:s.:.:.:.:.-...:.:.:.:.:-,:.: ,,,,,........,..: .j•....•.••'H I I 1 1 1 1 1 F..<0----, r--7 ...:.-.....,:.:.:.:.:.a.:...:.:.:%.:. ::.....--,....._....:.:.:1,.:.:.:. ..........- - , . ~ H y;: ..-......1-..:.:.:.:. ..-.....:. :.:.:.:,... , 77-7 1 - � LJ\ ' s.•:X4::4•::.f�t•::•:X::.'� i.•:•}:. , i 1 1 ..:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:,... ::ill•'• '•. •;+td• ':��l� :s:6 1�.•• -- , I2 ;1, - B 0. .....-:.:.:.....:...:.:. :.:..... .),......:„..i.,.,.„..:.:...:.:.:.:.:...........,. ,, .., .., 1 , I ..:,..,...., limil . ., 1 .-:. .-, ,...,, . • 3 . ' X15-111ii\ ,. ii•iisio•so A ,......s.::......::.::-4::.::.::.:i::.::.::.::- i'i'iiw iii ii�iii — - �, ... ,, MI ,,,Q r 20 �.CO 14 -Triter - •.`". - a' it-- " .'" V ''-''''-‘.3P. 't 4 4.. ' 5 ..2 t [17,77:"..." 4: 5 . .., ��.:, !kJ, '� k ,ate 7 , k �4 I ' I , . y : 3, • • IkA 'Y1 -- r"" 13 A ..'....,• MT Illi `:•"...' IVO TM . 1� 11'Jl . ., ,... .4 . ill 1 1 1 I -.„,,....._ .,-- .__ _ _.._ .. : vi- 4- 'r ' .. .. , ..... . -" ,—........iumaiii.x.T.ie-f. twit...-. . . .. . , .. _3,t,___4___„..„, ,,,, „- _ -Ai, . . ,...„ ,,,,,,, i• . — ... _ re .,_'2....11, '''`',4 '"\-- ...11.4...'-4' ' ' - - -:t: ' :4 ... -,„,..,., 1 ,. ii:iii - ..•, X. -, ; . p 1 1:.. •. .0 ..... .,,,..., it , ,: 7, _. :, i 0. __ _ % _ al ' ''. .1...1... .___ ' . 1 - - '.'1,.41 us 5161 *is di 0 O .: .•iii_j LI.t..j I I 1 .1 (4.) 'il4,4.20.Li• I -' V' * No . I Z -�,,., 7-7---',.." - .to 0 . . s �► •rIJ---J I r s• i 1 ` s -� Tvwir+ttiK 1 1• - 1 �T- (. ..fir. - I T _ \ ,i , 1, `. trj.71 . - .fes• r I '- u. . • ..,..4 t . 1' • i 5 - , .-11.-. 1.mi llimutit IT 1/ ,c;',":7 1 C_A _il iS . 4 ' ;2 , - . , 1 ---,i - , . :i!,.. 1 IOII[.1�I QL ) � _ :�i y V � .. _Zr ,• i 2 4 .. ,? ( a0" _ rye;471 : --0----( • ( 'Mit- • '1 1 s ,__,, 424. of 1 • tigq. . • .i• \:\ .1 1 ER:El 1- 1"‘ - 5 '44 44 - • 41%""'"IF... .i• I/ 7 • 7- _ I v� , : , NNE • I, , .a e-•'' 'cr - / - . I- • " lU“F OM, %ii ' • F • 4.• .-. - - :NI -•' --• (' .1 .; • L -ittel T ‘\‘ * .1 NM' ,.. 4-'1-,:• ,. ",,,•• • , • • ••- • . -( i J t • ? • '• . '• , '—q"°--- - • •• �i/ ..., ♦`—... ti •+ , ' ' '. '.'.1 ..' 3.611INV al 4 .il . f:- i(- .. 'XI -' _A* T 1....... - r 1. i:• 0 • )! '‘ • ,. I V•- • t •,i - , • - • 4 .e" - � � / 1. , �s •i _ii;� '' jig. >V4. :' ' , , ,v .. ,..... . - ,i !, . .,. _ _ R '.::‘,,'•,..... :/....,2.0ki....., . . , ... ' t '' - di • • 1,13 vtwer/Ary w,o y .,rj,. - .: ■ir '" '2 4.1 • , -•- - -; -.,r - „•_,..."...,, . �'41".".-'-- . _rte..-,- -•14 • ' Waal figim-111P •' •T' • �%.- -,0 •. ~ . -(• •� . .' •. , ,• PI WLC MIL ;. S'.01961114 - , lift=.', • 44- . t--.7 • li - .rt. .4i- - -- ."- -I. , . . • • . I ', 4• r (l-p t• •1 •'',+ Amara► r. ...., i-1 . 1. STATE'S MANGROVE RE-NOURISHMENT PROGRAM AND BOARDWALK 2. ' MIAMI BEACH MARINE PATROL BUILDING 3. DOCK MASTER'S BUILDING 4. POOL 5. SUNSET HARBOUR SALES CENTER . . _ . . _ . . _ _ - - - - _ PURDY AVENUE SITE PLAN " 10 ., . 4 . . . Existing _ _ __ ._ . .., . . ,' . -3 - . . I , , glihe: 4 ...'I& ‘- , 4,44. / „ . 4) . • ,i i--.4 i i in' ;, ' 4131 •--'7 lak* Cil i t i : \ *V•Ni` ' d moo t - • , �__ • ii100 .Vr ', _ t* ii . > ' 1,4' S e • , 4 ., .. 9 rs CC c.+ IPAArm” r • A0 # a � ? f• -s . .-..�- .- =w z' •p' ,, 0 .. Subject Property _,- .i.o 3:14 '!,. . •. '-. ti„. 41A • .• P Pr• • Arai M Ms Aril,. r ,....5 .v," ,, .. ig._]i mt „1111111 i I II ti , , V) tr....-, !NUJ fib' ' ii .a Stems E.nor s .. 's cy :,, i, • -%, 7 .. ........._ , ,rna ,, .... $T- ' ,. , iim 31110,11EINS Van%MO , WM 7:0. rque, Q. , ! , ddikia, l • 1460,11f morn L�- oillif. a EICNTEEisr //' , Illi . swab ��,1Lt1SLE �rit� ^• MK: _ .�� \�� 6+41%1, L7,701 1111', 'gam ; '. , -4„...?-rigl mu ,15.1,>wrimudEim,› • . van Iwo am wriselpla i: 1II • FM EE11111 fit' -.AC -.,4, 'As, • , 1 lir log .. _ ici . A, , .pb,,, ,.-, ' ..,:: :, - , „,, ______:__Low ._._ ,ar,... 6C41.: 9111C14 afiguar\ I 1111. Fr4 _ : O�a� !c. 0 a �, rids r•11.x• ---' ' 0101100. \ 0 mana iaG RCC "'Fa .4...a.mawie ,...7-: VC• Q .r it 111111111Eill woman1..:111001rj 7 10101111111. nal U ININ ,'-' .:1 \ '‘ ‘'.,, 3 6/ • - , P V 1 i i I____Wi_il__A•'' /7 4 / 1 I - -7; 1III1 LI CiC i.r°`s' rill= \ ',.. ' • ' , 4,„ \-.- •• , / i i,,iplipplailigh 4gai alr tong i c v `v •. I l= i t u �- .� ' ' V ' / /flims raga © In © 0 ' _ / .. •i'.•I' , s •d..,..i A AP M7-:,"!'S CT-!• • • Proposed, . _ __ , . . _ :___ ___,_ __ ___ ________ _ ,._ . __.., : , , - - • • . . _ _ , ,. v . , , - , I � / ". ti j . '4AP‘a ' 0 „ - -''• • • • Irti • -:•kil" 44 : ,„ _vi.,,,,A,-,. \ • a a % : ,ain, `. d ' .tr�'v� illit .. Vvr , NpAall1111111411Weaglikh. ' .• . ."sir p • ,:f • , '44 - ��.r 1 ‘ W"11 0011111111.11=1.1...1111.111`I.,,--s=ir.. .•••••=11•C=,••••=te.•IIIIMIlke 100-9 0.. /` Subject Property . .ol ,E1m3 .=..14 ' • i ....‘, " N./ ' ,.. 1. wtar gilio W.-11 in= 31111111:a': r _,'' (/) , a'1 "Ard2moi►; 4'1111 . • •. an 9T UP OP'S ! misp L, : mim S MWM 'Ail 5Eal num „ggrA, ,., "1411 • rv• I%• ElF4`-..A% CIRRI 1 , r ord.4 1.;r4.; Id= wow • . in e TEE ,". a. � t�� o � ElQ�1 . 1,i-.41.1!.!44.4.4k , FUN 11111iMina rirga Tig .... .11ismnrall . <0, .j.;. it• ,A 4f:7 pi - �. Pte/ :Z•!�=715111.' X44, ., liir �/ •!i •min II,.I • •„Ilia d �! Al DD d- • MIL - 'A' dwa Mai OM Emu= I gir ligthy ti nr-Ig:4:. 4 -46: 111%&41)..k‘t‘s L;li I' ' "" ____ 1111 ••k grir a; it" XI . -•-ii gra IFIllilik Iv:.- _Alia 0 inn me LI = I. simc..igasril Eli � 111111.)00.46:. \ 1 � Milili: � et�� �atai Iliq4RCC rc.r.- i !•��WOMB . 7,4714.00 0E� .vim 1 , ', \. A _01„baujimid‘ el • ' 0 am.- YEA OilErni V WARW. CIMI 6/, w T,e•c r ,.. II1L1C MC aaran 4%. Ear MN NEW • , p.1111411 ,,, a r✓ �5 ,,,,/,' _I! _i! I , // . _ _ t -j, A' ea= MI f511 .Te.]r arm _ ,I I .��s t� ._.. rm a--� 11 Vi\11T11VtiL amo RESOLUTION NO. 92-20471 Calling a public hearing to consider a recommendation of the Planning Board on the following: Amendment to the map of Zoning Ordinance 89-2665 by Down-zoning Lots 27-34 of Block 15-A, Island View 0 Addition from the RNI-3, multiple family high intensity district and include said property in the RM-1, multiple family low • intensity district said lots owned by Yacht Club Southeastern, Inc. , (A/K/A Sunset Harbor) .