RESOLUTION 92-20571 T
•ATsnoTOT.zdPo
JO ATTaPagTgiP qOP qou pTp p.i og auk gpuq. pup 'sauT TapTnO a T
anTpm oq aquTJdoaddP qT aNPuz pTnoM goTgM saouPgsuzno.zTO AUP go
aOuapTAa go )(OPT P uodn pup sauTTapTnO ubTsaQ pagdopp aq . gaam
qou PIP buTpTs auk 4p11.4 aouapTAa TPTqupgsgns puP quagaduzoo
uodn paspq SPM TagoH PuTIP PD egg 4P buTpTs Pur uTpga.z
oq Aupduzo0 buTpToH PuzgOP.zg 04 Ssau94PT.Ido.zddy ;o 84POT;T4.Ia3
P PUP TPAO.IddV MaTAaH ubTsaQ Auap oq pup sauTTapTns
ubTsaQ pagdopp aqq. uzo.z; AJPA Jo 9ATPM 04 qou uo T s T Oap
s ,papog uoTgpn.Iasa.xd o-pogSTH/p1POq MaTAaH ubTsaQ aus, •T
:sbuTpuT; buTMOTTO; eqk Sa){Puz UOTSSTuzutOO A TO eq4 ' 111111
;TgTgxa SP oga.zaq pagoPg4P Z66T '8 ATnr pa;Pp uznpuPiouiayi uoTSSTuzuzOO
S I uOTgP.IlSTUTuzpV auq. uT pauTPquoo STPT1a.Puz auk puP TPaddP pTps
uo buTapaq agq. .p p.zpaq squauznbap agq. uodn pasPq 'SKa2IaHM
pUP ! Z66T ' ZZ ATnr
uo uOTSSTuzuzO3 A TO aqq. a.zo;aq papaq SPM TPaddP pTPs 'SYauaHM
PUL :UOTSSTMUO3 'qT3 goPag TLULTN
• oq uOTSTOap S ,p.IPOg uOTgPAIasaad o-pogSTH/p1POg MaTAaH ubTsaQ
eq; paiPeddp AuPduzo3 buTpToH PMITOPJg 'c99 -6s 'off aOuPuTp.IO buTuoZ
goPag TuzPTW go A4TO go T ' -8I uoT4Oas 04 quPns.ind 'SYauaHM
pup :anuaAv SuTTTOO CLT ' Ta4OH PUTTP PD 9144 4P bUTquTq
MOpuTM eATgoaT;aa pup buTpTs TPgam uTPga1 o4 SSaua.PT.zdo.zddV
3o 9 POT JT.1a3 P PUP TPAo.zddV MaTAaH ubTsaQ .Io; AUPdMOO bUTPTOH
PutgoP.zg jO 11OT4POTTddP alp paTuap p.zPog uoTgPn.Iasa.Id OT.IOqSTH/p.1Pog
MaTAaH ubTsaQ g3Pag T' TW go AqT0 auk Z66T ' CT APw uo 'SVRITRHM
•SsV'ID/ONISNIS
MOQNIIM aAISOa'I3a2i 3o NOISNialau
OZ JAI I SYTI aii NO I S I O as aHs 3O SUKd SKILL
NOIILY IaaISNOOa2I am! XNOWIISaI 2iaHIUfd 2IOd
auvoa aHs OS JNIIQNKWa?I MTV 'IaSOH Vi1I'I�LSKO
HILL SV DNIIQIS 'IVsa' mIKsa2I Os ANIYdWOO
JNIU'IOH VIGIOVUUOS SSaNIaIKI2Iao2IdaY 30
aIvoiaiIL IaO V (INV 'IYAO2IddY MaIAa2I NOISaa
JNIIXNIaa a2IYOg NOISKA2Iasaua OI2IOZSIH/a2IKOa
MaIAa2I NJISaa siXSIO aHs 30 Z66t '£t XVI
3O NIOI S I Oaa aHs dO IL IKa SYHI JNIIW I I33Y
KaI2IO'I3 'HoYaa IWYIN 30 XSIO am
30 NIOI S S IHWOO AZ I O aHs 3O NOI SWI OS aii K
T LSOZ-Z6 'ON NOIILfVIOSa2i
2 . In rendering its decision of May 13 , 1992 , the Board did
not consider evidence as to whether the reflective material on
the windows is or is not a part of the window glass and as to
when and by whom the reflective tinting/glass was installed,
and that the Board should hear such evidence and then
reconsider that part of its decision relating to retention of
the reflective tinting/glass.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA as follows:
1. The Design Review Board/Historic Preservation Board' s decision
of May 13 , 1992 not to waive or vary from the adopted Design
Guidelines and to deny Design Review Approval and a
Certificate of Appropriateness to Brachma Holding Company to
retain metal siding at the Catalina Hotel was based upon
competent, substantial evidence that the metal siding was not
in compliance with the Design Guidelines and upon the lack of
evidence of circumstances which would make it appropriate for
the Board to waive or vary from the Guidelines; the Board did
not act arbitrarily or capriciously in reaching this decision.
b) The Design Review Board should receive evidence as to
whether the reflective material on the windows is tinting or
is imbedded in the glass and as to when and by whom it was
installed and should then reconsider its decision relating to
retention of said reflective material.
2 . That part of the Design Review Board/Historic Preservation
Board' s decision of May 13 , 1992 to denying Brachma Holding
Company' s request for Design Review Approval and a Certificate
of Appropriateness to retain metal siding at the Catalina
Hotel, 1732 Collins Avenue, is hereby affirmed.
3 . That part of the Design Review Board/Historic Preservation
Board' s decision of May 13 , 1992 relating to retention of
reflective window tinting at the Catalina Hotel is hereby
remanded to the Design Review Board/Historic Preservation
2
Board for reconsideration in keeping with the aforestated
findings.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of July , 1992 .
ATTEST: �#
VI CE-MAYOR
Cyqa c- 7--rry-,,ev,v--
r'--i:/tA
CITY CLERK
SWS:scf:\disk2\denybrak.res
FORM PPPROVED
LEC:: _ DEPT.
By _
S catim. 7r. 5.64444.‘i
8 - 3/- 13,
Date - --�-
3
it • •
• .
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
64 iliciAmu, • ziead
F L 0 R I D A
fc
4', ;k.
LAURENCE FEINGOLD *iINCOR�,ORATED
P O BOX 0
Y ATTORNEY v N?__ MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33-9-2032
TELEPHONE (305)673-7470
TELECOPY (305)673-7002
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO: j/3()-97—
DATE:
)' 7DATE: JULY 8, 1992
TO: MAYOR SEYMOUR GELBER AND
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION
CITY MANAGER ROGER M. CARLTON
FROM: LAURENCE FEINGOLDL•f
CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: APPEAL TO CITY COMMISSION OF DENIAL OF DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD APPROVAL/CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
The purpose of this Memorandum is to provide the Commission
with legal guidelines for review of the Design Review
Board/Historic Preservation Board decision in the attached matter.
Subsection 18-2 . I of the City's Zoning Ordinance No. 89-2665
provides that decisions of the City' s Design Review Board may be
appealed to the City Commission. In deciding such appeals, the
City Commission sits in a review capacity to determine if the Board
acted properly. The City Commission may not consider issues which
were not raised before the Board or issues which are not within the
jurisdiction of the Board; nor may the Commission consider new
evidence or arguments not considered by the Board.
If the Commission finds that the Board' s decision was based
upon competent substantial evidence and that the Board did not act
arbitrarily or capriciously, then the Commission must deny the
appeal and affirm the Board' s decision. Conversely, if the
Commission finds that the Board did not act properly, it must grant
the appeal and reverse the Board's decision.
Pursuant to Section 18-2 . I of the Zoning Ordinance, a 5/7ths
vote is required to reverse a decision of the Design Review Board.
LF:SWS: scf
denyappr.cm
1
AGENDA
TEM ' - -
DATE - 2- 2
T :`\\TES DRIVE — FOURTH FLOOR — MIAMI BEACh FLORIDA 33'3:4
A
U.M.J _1VAL OFF.
RESOLUTION NO. 92--20.571
* Affirming that part of the decision of
1::mmisma May 13, 1992 of the City's Design Review
Board/Historic Preservation Board denying
g
Design Review approval and a Certificate
of Appropriateness to Brachma Holding
Company to retain metal siding at the
Catalina Hotel and remanding to the Board
for further testimony and reconsideration
that part of the decision relating to
0 retention of reflective window
or. tinting/glass,
. _
_ .
_ „ ,
_ . . _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
inummilmainommorm
. . • ,. _
_ _ _ _ _ _ „ _ .