Loading...
MB RDA MINUTES FEBRUARY 20, 1985 • MIAMI BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING February 20, 1985 - 9:00 a.m. CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS INDEX TO MINUTES OF MEETING RESOLUTION PAGE NO. NO. NONE 1. Roll Call - Meeting commenced 11:47 a.m. 1 all members present. 2. Acceptance of Minutes of February 6, 1985 1 meeting. 3. Report of Executive Director. Deputy Director gave brief oral status reports on: 1) Coast Guard Property 1-3 2) Cheezem Development Agreement 2 3) South Pointe Park 3 4) Newman Contract 3 5) SSDI Lawsuit 4-6 6) Corridor Studies 6 7) Housing Authority Negotiations 18-20 (Copy of report filed with records of meeting.) 4. Old Business a. Presentations on Corridor Studies by 7-17 representatives Land Design Research, Inc. , Goodkin Research Corp. , and Halcyon Ltd. (Corridor Studies team) b. Agency recommendation to City Commission 19-20 to take immediate steps to commence condemnation proceedings to acquire property for vehicular-right-of-way for marina from Housing Authority. 5. New Business - none 20 6. Report of Agency Attorney - none ?0 7. Adjournment - 1:18 p.m. (all members pre- 21 except for Mr. Daoud, who left the meeting at 12:40 p.m.) Next meeting: Wed., March 6, 1985, 9:00 A.M. FH:lr 60 00Q44 SHOCKETT: I understand. Whatever you arrive at, we have tor • Garner/Mason so that they don't . . . we don' t satisfy have to make good on a . . . . (inaudible -voices overlap) PARKINS: Until we fulfill our obligation to that tenant. SHOCKETT: But what I'm saying is, hopefully that all ofou are the problems and if there's a Y aware of all gun pointed at your head. . , . , FROMBERG: The point is well taken, Mr. Shockett. The documents received last Friday, I believe, were just PARKINS: Thursday. FROMBERG: . . . .Thursday, and I want to assure all ofyou • immediate priority by the CityAdministrationthat it received and the City Attorney's office and that ever since that moment they have been deeply involved • their strategy from a legal standpoint P Y in determining 9 p int and are very, very aware of the concerns of Carner/Mason and are addressing those concerns, complicated issue and I'm sure thatyour but it's a point is well taken and that is that as soon as any decisions are reached, all of the Commissioners individually, should be advised as to what's happeningso ► that their concerns can be addressed. We're all concerned about it but I just want they' re on top of it and it is a complex issue. � to let you know that SHOCKETT: Mr. Fromberg, let me just say, because I have Weiner about this, and I did inno talked to Arnold way intend to reflect that he is not on top of it. He certainly is and I think he's doingan excellent • but what I want to do isget out job with it, in the record that there are these problems and that we have to face them, and face them immediately. Arnold's doing an excellent job. I think WEINER: Mr. Shockett, thank you and I just want to there's been any insufficiency assure you• that if on our part it's been reporting back individually to the Commissioners but rest assured that addressed individuallyand the problem is being more importantly collectively by the City Attorney' s office and the Administration. We' re hand in hand on this one. SHOCKETT: Speaking of that, can we get to the next item? FROMBERG: Okay. What other items do you have, Mr. Fosmoen? FOSMOEN: Mr. Mayor, I know that your agenda is beginning we do have all of the consultants whog g to run late, hut are involved in the corridor studies. It was our intention to make a presentation which isoin to ' basis for much of the information at the Developer's g provide the eveloper's Conference. You' re probably looking at a half hour's worth of time in order to bring date on the design issues, market issues, the housing you up to absorption rates and the financial studies that have gone on for the last month months since those contracts were entered into. and a half/two FROMBERG: I think . . . can we postpone the Executive Session ' until after this or what? PARKINS: Well, you' re looking at what, 12:35, Richard. . . . FOSMOEN: . . . (inaudible) we won' t take them off the hook and take k� them off stage. FROMBERG: Who's involved in the Executive Session? PARKINS: Pete Hurtgen, a couple of staff people. I'll ask them to come in at a quarter of one. _ WEISBURD: One o'clock. PARKINS: One o'clock. FROMBERG: I think you ought to do it 1:45. M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 6 6, SINGER: This is the last item. SHOCKETT: It's not the last item. FROMBERG: It's not. We have a couple of items after this, too. Why don' t you make it 1:30 and why don' t you get some orders from us? PARKINS: All right, sir. FOSMOEN: Do you want to move on this one? FROMBERG: This Executive Session should take about a half hour, Mr. Parkins? Okay, we'll go from 1:30 to 2:00 and we'll eat while we're while we're in Executive Session. SHOCKETT: What time is the Executive Session? FROMBERG: 1:30 and at 2 o'clock we've got DAOUD: Can't we take it at 1:00, Mal? FROMBERG: Well, we may not be through here. PARKINS: Mayor, that's 1 o'clock then for the Executive Session, is that correct? FROMBERG: No, I think you ought to make it 1:30. PARKINS: 1:30. FROMBERG: Let's go forward. FOSMOEN: We have representatives here today from Land Design Research, g Sy Paumier who has been dealing with the design issues of the corridor studies. Lou Goodkin and an associate of his are here to talk about housing market absorption rates, particularly as they relate to South Pointe. Jerry Rappaport and Bill Mahers are here from Halcyon Ltd. to discuss office and commmercial market absorption rates as well as the financial strategies properties to make development that we'll use in beginning to assemble someg cites available. Also, Marty Leitner is here from Freilich and Leitner. They've been extensively involved in coordiatingthe activitiesof y that consulting team. Let me introduce Sy Paumier who has some slides and a discussion of the design issues relating to the Corridor studies and the public improvements. PAUMIER: Thank you, Richard. The presentation will probably take about ten to fifteen minutes. What we'd like to do is to kind of giveY ou an overview. Obviously everybody in this room, I'm sure, is veryfamiliar with the area, but I'd like to just kind of share a e the process that we've gone through over the last two months and how we've arrived at basicallysome fairly specific development recommendations. First off, there are, as you well know, many great resources both natural and man-made in the area and there are a number of very strong business enterprises in the area around which a total development program can be built. The corridors that we've put the most emphasis on are basically Alton Road and Biscayne Street. These are the two major � arterial streets that are going to receive the most commitment. The area today has many, many strong features, among those thearks and open spacesbe p p that tend to along the water's edge. The existing arterial street that runs parallel to the ocean, Ocean Drive, is certainly one of the great resources that this South Shore has but it today lacks amenity and a quality of environment. There are many substantial structures along this corridor but there is no environment and one of the considerations needs to be how do we improve the environment for people in this particular area which today is so lacking in anyualit q Y- The Fifth Street corridor has been recognized for a long time in the overall planning as a key zone for office and support commercial and the recommendations you' ll see in a minute are focusing on trying to enhance that corridor. There's already considerable investment going on in the area and commitments are being made to major renovation of a number of buildings. The M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 7 60 000449 PAUMIER (Cont'd) : The Alton Road corridor today is very underutilized, underdeveloped, in many places does not have adequate off-street curbs and there is no streetscape; overhead utilities and things of this nature tend to mar the environment of the area. And certainly the most important area of all, which is the Fifth Street intersection of Alton Road, is absolutely lacking in any sense of entrance image. On the whole, the entrance coming from Miami into this area really desperately needs to be announced at this point. The termination of where the corridor kind of ends at the ocean, today, is certainly lacking. This particular park and open space could become a great resource to the total South Pointe area, and we mention a number of underutilized pieces of land throughout the area that need to be developed. The infill opportunities are many, and we'll share those with you in a few minutes. There are a number of vacant sites in the zone and we would like to see those become opportunities. Some of the negative things which are of concern obviously are things such as the maintenance and care of things such as the alleyways often which become very depressing zones. The so-calledp arks in the area look a little bit like concentration camps because many of them are, in fact, enclosed by fences and are very, very unattractivelaces for people. �' We see a number of situations like this where you see areas that look like they're overgrown with no maintenance and signs saying "no dumping". And throughout the area you see accumulations of trash in side yards and real sense of no care for the environment. With this kind of quality it's very difficult to anticipate investors wanting to come to an area that is lacking, in what I would say, some of the very basic maintenance issues. And then we have the area of the public housing with its accompanying parking and if you will, automobile kind of repair yard, in buildings many cases looking like they've been shells for a long time. And other buildings that have been closed or not used any longer but give you that sense of nothing happening. ha enin . Now starting at the northwest corner of Fifth and Alton, the early marketing studies that were done suggested that this was an ideal zone, that there were a number of people interested in the possibility of building office space in the area. Today, the area is certainly underutilized and contains a lot of one and two story buildings, automobile parking, used car lots, things of this nature, which suggests that this is really not a very, very prime utilization of this very important land. So basically, what we've done is, we've focused on this as probably the single most important area. We think the school has greatp otential for being renovated into a first class facility, and our current recommendations are that that occur at that location. The school has certainly a historic value and structurally appears to be in good shape but today again is very Y negative because of its condition. This is one of two basic . . fairly definitive development plans. Now, these are not. . .we' re not trying just to do a bunch of pretty pictures, we' re trying to do fairly accurate kinds of development plans which illustrate what we think could he the proposed development program. As you can see along the Fifth Street corridor coming from Miami into Miami Beach we' re showing basically as many as six sites for office development of probably three to ten stories in height. Again, the dimension of height is totally related to the parking structures or the parking capacity, but we're basically showing buildings that have footprints of about 20,000 plus or minus square feet per floor and we' re showing again the ability to accommodate probably, for the most part, four to eight story kind of construction. The red buildings are a part of the waterfront land next to the marina which is . . . . we' re looking at currently as housing but again the office development could continue southward if the developer ultimately feels that that is a better utilization of that land. On the lower right you see the school addressed, renovated with additional land for recreation adjacent to the school. Another alternative that we've looked at which we think is more positive is moving the main entrance eastward about one block, away from Alton. Otherwise Alton, you can see is in the middle left and that street would become a part of the development site and both of the office buildings then are basically on that piece of property on the left. . .lower left and on the right we have basically the possibility of the open space or recreation area adjacent to the school being a part of the so-calledatewa entrance to the 9 Y total area. We feel it's absolutely essential that we do develop a strong M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 8 60 000450 PAUMIER (Cont'd) : sense of entry off of Fifth Street into this total zone referred to as South Pointe. The kind of quality we'd like to see obviously are not necessarilyhigh- rise buildings but we'd like to see the architecture close to the street with a heavy landscaping on the outer edges as a way of creatinga strongsense of quality and environment alongFifth Street e and along Alton Road. We also think it's important to do some good landscaping and develop a strong sense of entrance image at that point with a combination of walls and landscaping. Moving southward along the corridor, we're talkingabout putting boulevard in. We expect and hope that some P ng a of the land uses will change. The water tower, as you know, will be replaced. Goingfurther see the land currently owned bythe City south you can on the left which will become available in a few years. The total area is certainlyunderutilized ' very low-rise buildings, a tremendous with amount of surface parking, warehouse type uses, public housing project which we think is certainlynot ' or doing the best in terms of helping conducive p ng that particular portion of land. Looking eastward along Biscayne, and this particularlan you see Alton RoadP shows, coming from the upper left, terminating in kind of a. . .if you will, a bit of a traffic circle, then connecting eastward along in the bottom left is a future site which would Biscayne. The site c be in the place of Goodman Terrace, hopefully a site for either a hotel or apartments. On going up along the shore, we're showingbasicallythe left, low-rise buildings along the waterfront edge of approximately three to four stories mid-rise coming out of the back. It's e with mid-rise the pinker buildings, are the high- rise buildings. Those would be probably in the neighborhood ' stories and they would face on tog ood of six to ten Alton, so we' re trying to step away from the water with the lowest development along the t-- edge and then stepping Where the current water tower is, g pptn9 hack. we would recommend the possibility on that corner, is an excellent site for a small office building ld�.nq and other commercial uses. Going eastward you can see the white buildingis Restaurant and adjacent to him is another Joe's Stone Crab infill parcel. The value of the marina is yet not been recognized or certainly felt, but we do believe that as has happened in a number of cities, the advent of a marina and a strong waterfront edge and high quality improvements, pedestrian improvements the edge will, in fact, helpto entice the p along h_ kind of uses that we think are important, namely, indoor/outdoor relationships. Even if p we have only housing in the area, we need to have certainly ground floor uses such as this one to make the waterfront exciting. Again, we talked about lower-rise buildings next to the water but higher-rise buildings comingback from the edge. We're trying to, in every case, require as part of the guidelines, that the surface treatment of the parking deck, that will he required,d, alwaysbe landscaped, so that anyhigh-rise or mid-rise units would look down on a landscaped parking rather then a deck. Again, the concept which has been tested here in the area, the idea o . . .along the major arterials, instead of the parking garages havinga face on the road, we would expect and require re that we q have two and three story office uses, hopefully, to provide an edge to the parking rather than having the parking garages come out on the street. We believe this is one of the great assets in the area, and this particular zone has been referred to as where most of the commercial and retail uses would be focused from here going eastward to the beach. As you can see there are several keysites available r. particularly on the left. The Cheezem property on the right, also recommends commercial uses. Turning the corner and going northward, we'veof an underutilized block that's really verynegative. The9 park area today is also, in our opinion, not contributing much and we think this could become a great asset to the area. This plan we've developed here suggests that from Joe' s Stone Crab, which is on the left, in the white building, that a series of infill buildings, the yellow buildings, basically low-rise construction with the exception maybe on Ocean Drive, that might be a mid-rise building. A major parking garage will be required. We also think that in the waterfrontark r use that it would be ideal to have a majorP not just t open space, and we're suggesting the possibility of a restaurant in the park to help, again, bring people and life. 9 The Biscayne S treet. . .we expect a small boulevard. We would hope to accomplish an environment similar to this. Again, fairly heavy landscaping p 9 on the edges. Internally, within the blocks, we think there should he interior courtyards. In the park, itself, rather than the big lot which is M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 9 60 000451 PAUMIER (Cont'd) : there today, We would much rather see the area devoted to some real beauty. Absolutely needs to be a great park in the Pier Park area, which is today very dull. The advantage of having a restaurant in there would be that it would bring people to a use that's very important. It would also provide revenue to the city which could then be used to help maintain the parks and things that are created. The last element is basically infill housing. We've been lookingat a whole series of sites within the community. We focused y basically on the areas along the west edge, along Alton Road trying to figure out which of these areas might provide the best opportunity for infill housing. One e of the sites we've been looking at is a site that's currentlyowned bythe We think that might be an idealplace for City. some elderly housing when, in fact, those buildings are no longer needed. To the north you can see four different sites, half block, third blocks, that whole area is fairly bleak today and there are as I mentioned am. nu her of vacent sites. What we're talking about and the marketingstudies suggest, townhouse type densitie. We're talkingabout two 9d t� and three story buildings overtop of parking with landscape decks on top of the parkingand again housing very similar in scale to that which is occurring q all over the country today. I don' t have a typical Florida example of this type of is housing which is being built in the Baltimore/Washington YPthing. This area and again, it's this kind of housing which we believe is desired and needed.e Again it's happening with this case it's parking under the . We buildings. believe it's happening in other cities it g elieve as can happen here if we only set the guide- lines for that type of development. The overall plan we think is realistic. it focuses, as I mentioned, on the Corridor along these two major streets and we think the last step or the next step is to try to provide the community and the developers with a little better image of what it could be. We have to begin to raise aise the standards and the level of vision for people and by doing a number of studies that would really indicate the kind of quality that we expect to achieve that we think that the developers of the private sector will in fact respond p nd to the opportunity that you have here. Thank you. FROMBERG: Okay, Gentlemen, let's get back up here. GRENALD: In the audience we have from Chicago the President of the Boat Show, Mr. Jeff Napier, a wonderful, dynamic plus for this cityand he's s really interested. Sitting out there looks like a college kid but 9 we recognize him. Will you stand up, Jeff, please? (applause) FROMBERG: Let me add to that the fact that this being the world's largest boat show, the g preliminary event with the NFL meetings to build up to the boat show and the type of publicity that you have given to this community with this really fabulous show is something that we're all veryproud of and we commend you. As we drive into this facility and we see the boats lined up and then I see them along Purdy Avenue when I see them coming e across the Causeway, as long as I'm not behind them, it's great. } (lau hter You've (laughter)really done a fantastic job and we in this community reallyappreciate it. Good. His comment was, he's just t p J getting started. That's great. ARKIN: We'll give you another half a million speed. FROMBERG: We' re expanding the show just for you because we understood that you wouldn' t come back without it, so this whole expansion of the Convention Center program is just for you, Jeff. GRENALD: Two things, he' s offered to give his expertise in two , laces in P the expansion of the Convention Center with input for users, and also with the Marina, the establishment of the marina in which they have a4 reat deal of knowledge. I think we should tap that as a great source of input. FROMBERG: Thank you. Mr. Fosmoen, continue, please. FOSMOEN: Yes, sir. Tom Powers and Lou Goodkin are here to discuss the housingjust9aspects of this project, in price and absorption rates for housing. Let me put this in context for a second. The objective of the study is to obviously attract developers into this area. What we're doing is what a developer would do if it was a hot market area. We' re setting design desi n standards so that developers are comfortable when they make an investment M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 10 60 000452 FOSMOEN (Cont'd) : that the balance of that area is eventually going to come up to a standard that's acceptable. Secondly, we're providing the developers with information on the kind of housing, price of housing and how quickly that can be absorbed. Number three, we' re also looking at commercial and retail office absorption rates and finally, for our purposes and the developer, we' re putting together a series of financial packages so that they' ll know the kinds of services and facilities and money incentives that we have to offer when they come to this community to make their investment. So with that let me introduce Tom Powers and then Lou Goodkin and we'll wrap it up with representatives from Halcyon. We're trying to keep it within thirty-five to forty minutes. FROMBERG: Okay. Let me say that the previous presentation was very impressive. TOM POWERS: I'm Tom Powers with the Goodkin Research Corporation. We were retained to complete the market analysis, the ability analysis for the residential components of South Pointe. Just very briefly in going over the methodology that we used, obviously, we can't treat you as a suburban development a la West Dade, Broward County perhaps or Palm Beach County. The urban infield is a very different of a creature. You have to treat it very differently. Consequently, we actually broke the work down into two different levels. Number one, we have to know all we can possibly know about what's happening in the Dade market place relative to the for sale product, rental product and of course land sales. I say all we need to know, all we can possibly know. We' re talking about product, product by type, what types of amenities are necessary to attract people and particularly younger worker-age households, interprojects, what type of amenity base is necessary and what type of product and price levels that they' re responding ' y to. It's s important of course not only to know in Miami Beach what's happening but also our competition obviously is in points west of. the City of Miami, in the Kendall area in particular, and the Miami Lakes area. Of course we have to pay a lot of attention to the secondary data, migration. Because the richness of what happens in urban areas isn' t the notion of people necessarily moving into and to consume suburban housing, but the real richness is the velocity of movement into by younger people in particular into urban areas to take advantage of housing. Migration of people in this area and the movement of firms into this area obviously played a very important part in our analysis. To give an example, if you look at the majority of the work flow you note that 20,000 people come to work in Miami Beach every day but they don' t live in Miami Beach. That's opportunity. We can cater to that opportunity. PP Y• An additional 10,000 people migrate daily from South Broward County to work in the City of Miami, that's additional opportunity that we can cater to. FROMBERG: Excuse me. Let me go back over those statistics. You said 20,000 people come to work in Miami Beach each day. . . . POWERS: That do not live. FROMBERG: . . .that don't live in the City? POWERS: Right. That is a potential opportunity, a potential market that we can cater to, currently that we have to be aware of. FROMBERG: What industries are these people involved in generally? What type of jobs, hotels, hospital? POWERS: Principally they' re service-oriented jobs. Certainly the government here is a big employer. That type of a job. A service, hotel/motel, eating and drinking establishments, , that type of thing. There's this move-about-market and we' re firmly convinced that we' re going to attract market and we will attract market here. We' re talking about a market that lives in South Florida today as opposed to marketing product in northeast for example, that kind of a thing. Just to wrap up my portion here, we often, in particular economists, we tend to forecast housing demands, and we tend to treat Dade County as something of a special creature, noting that in fact for a county of 11.8 million, we' re only going to do about 12,000/13,000 new for sale units in 1985, so the he demand for M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 11 60 000453 POWERS (Cont'd) : new unit housing appears on the surface to be quite low. In fact, if you look at the resale market in this county, you notice that 25,000 or 27,000 new or resale units will turn over in 1985. So the demand for housing in Dade County is quite strong. It's alive and well. It simply hasn' t really been catered to in particular by the depth of the builder market for a lot of reasons. So to wrap it up then, we're convinced that if Miami, in particular, the City of Miami matures, stronger job formation is very much a plus for what's going to happen in South Beach, people wanting to live in South Beach. We're convinced that real incomes will increased and in fact have been increasing from 3% to 311% here in Dade County. That's additional (inaudible) ability to afford. I don't know what the financial markets are going to do in terms of interest rates but that's quite another story. So at any rate, I'll turn it over now with that background having been laid, to Lou Goodkin, who will address the product. FROMBERG: Mr. Goodkin, welcome. LOU GOODKIN: Thank you very much. It's a pleasure. We're really excited about the opportunities of South Pointe because when we look at this and I am, of course, on record not being the most enthusiastic person when commenting on the state of the luxury and the highrise market in South Florida, particularly in Dade County. But when we looked at the opportunity we have here at South Pointe, I think it's very encouraging. When we look at the alternatives we are the most conveniently located address that an individual working in the downtown corridor, looking for a coastal-oriented location can respond to. And while we can be more affordable as opposed to being. . .we' re not going really to be addressing the low price and the true affordable, that's really the inland developments are going to be responsible for that. But for people that are looking for an environment with close proximity to work, the airport area and the downtown corridor, we' re in excellent shape particularly in light of the alternatives that are in the market place, the Grove which has very little land left for development, very high-priced land, the Gables which has no real coastal development opportunities, and when we look further north, it's not as conveniently located as ours. It doesn't have the infrastructure to respond to the market. We took a philosophy after looking at this that while our long range view was to look at more affordable housing product. So I can define what we consider affordable and realistic here, would be in the $80,000 to $125,000 range, but it was our decision that the initial development should not be in that range. But we should be focused on the Marina area and in the close proximity to the Marina area with higher priced product that would be exciting architecturally much more so than certainly the vertical opportunities are elsewhere in Dade County, that we feel could address a market that is qualified to both rent and purchase here that is not being catered to at all. We recommended that the initial development phase be rental units, renting in the range of $540,000 with views, to $975 a month with views to $450 to $850 with views. We feel that there's a very strong market for this and we assume that the 1986 market entrance with 180 units projected an absorption rate of 15 to 20 units for nine months to one year rental for that particular phase. (COMMISSIONER DAOUD LEFT MEETING 12:40 P.M.) FROMBERG: I'm sorry, would you go over that once more? GOODKIN: Surely. Our first recommendation is to offer rentals adjacent to the marina, and this product would be for non-view ranging from $450 a month for a studio to $850 a month for a 2/2, for non-view; $540 to $975 for view oriented, directly on the view. We said that 180 units would he the initial phase, would have an absorption of 15 to 20 units a month or a nine month to one year rental period. This is to be followed by for sale units ranging from the one plus convertible den to a 2/2 plus convertible den with square footage ranging from 1,050 to 1,400 square feet and with pricing ranging from base pricing of $109,990 to $147,990 with the premiums for view, $132,990 to $176,990. We recommended a 1987 pre-selling presence of 200 units and projected an absorption for that product of ten units a month. M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 12 60 000454 GOODKIN (Cont'd) : Now, one of the things that we had to consider is, if we were going to spend dollars, let's say, to motivate people where we can accomplish more by having a lower price or having a far more exciting product that would be at a price that we feel the market would be responsive to. We feel that the market is just loaded with vanilla type of product in various ranges all the way up to several hundred thousand dollars. That isn't what the market needs. What the market is calling for is something that younger professional households, including a very substantial number of two-income professional households would be responsive to. Not high-rise but mid-rise over parking with much more of a residential thematic architecture, heavily landscaped, more in tune with the type of the thing you'd see at a Marina Del Ray which we refer to you in Southern California, that really builds on its marina orientation. Phase III we recommended two possible infill products including all two and three-story townhouses that develop a density of 22 units or more an acre, to go from $124,990 to $146,990 for one of those products to the product closest to the marina to go from $152,990 to $200,000. This second phase would only consist of 44 units. The first thing, or the more moderate priced product would be the greater piece of property that would be for 75 or more units. We felt that those 44 units, assuming a 1987 market entry, could achieve an absorption of 3.66 units a month or one year sell-out for the 44 units. That's basically our report. WEISBURD: Mr. Mayor. FROMBERG: Just review one. Phase I is what? GOODKIN: Phase I is rental. We start with that in a 1986 market entrance of 180 rental units. FROMBERG: Okay. Phase II is? GOODKIN: Is adjacent to that for sale condominium product, and that consists of 200 units. FROMBERG: Okay, and a price range of . . . . GOODKIN: Price range. . .base prices from $109.990 to $147,990, and the premium views would be from $132,990 to $176,990, approximately a hundred dollars a square foot plus. . . . (unclear) FROMBERG: Okay. WEISBURD: Mr. Mayor. FROMBERG: Commissioner Weisburd: WEISBURD: I'm listening to the numbers and you were talking about affordable homes or rentals or whatever, and we' re talking about young professionals that are coming up and they're not making no $150,000 or $200,000. They' re probably making closer to $35,000 to $50,000, and possibly with two incomes. Are you telling me a combined household income of $50,000 let's say, could afford $109,000 home or condominium? GOODKIN: Tom in the back did a total qualification in terms of what would be affordable. He could address that. One of the things I want to emphasize is that we don't see this as being where the legitimate depth of the market is, the programs we recommended. What we' re saying is, we feel it's critical to make a very strong statement at the marina, closely adjacent to it, to set the tone. We feel there is a market for that product. But in addressing the market you're talking about, we have to get into that $80,000 to $125,000 range and that's going to be really with these infill product lines. But we didn' t feel that the right strategy was to address that initially but to address the things that are going to be tone setting, to make it highly desirable. We did feel comfortable that there was in fact, enough market to support the number of units that we projected for that which was basically 200, in the case of the vertical and 44 in the case of the townhouses. M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 13 60 00045E WEISBURD: My concern is this, that probably the first market that you' re going to go after are Dade Countians and they probably have more reasonable homes or rentals throughout Dade County. They're living somewhere and to get them to come here for more money and be the pioneers, so to speak, because it's a renovated new area, I think that could be a tough job. g SHOCKETT: I don't. I think that we have so much to offer . . .. FROMBERG: Let's hear from the expert then we'll. . . . . GOODKIN: I am very sensitive to what you're saying, but I think that we have to appreciate that the alternatives that these people have that would want to live in a good coastal location that has the kind of environment that we can offer, and particularly, the kind of product we envision, is not being offered in the market place. It will be far more exciting architecturally, yet good value. The type of numbers we're talking about are the numbers per square foot that a lot of these projects that came on the market in the $150,000 and $160,000 range actually ended up reducing their product in order to sell. So I mean the value is excellent for what it is. But if you look at the Key Colony type of an opportunity where. . .in Key Biscayne where they have substantially higher land costs because we have clients that have major holdings there and we have the Grove. . .certainly there are plenty of opportunities in the northern part of Miami beaches. There's plenty of major pieces. However, we found that in the case of the waterways, and that's more in the direction we have to go, when we hit the pricing that was like $80,000 to $150,000 at the waterways, we started getting a substantial number of young people that did respond to the waterways and that pricing. In fact, interesting enough, the most popular selling product at the waterways in North Miami is townhouses with a garage. Those particular townhouses are selling in that $135,000 to $150,000 range, getting young people and certainly if you look at where they work, they find it much more convenient to live in this area. If we are talking about this being where all of our product go, I'd be very concerned. But we' re very comfortable that there's enough demand that we could confortably sell the number of units we're talking about. WEISBURD: My only concern was there's such a gof apartments and rentals and condominiums throughout the county and I don't thi nk. . .well, there's a lot of people moving into the State, I don' t know if they're necessarily moving into Dade County as much as the northern part of the State. But we have to attract those people down but I think at this point our concentration is going to be to get the Dade County young, upward, mobile, professionals that work downtown Miami to want to live on Miami Beach because of the proximity of their work, so they can take five or ten minutes to get to work instead of being locked up in traffic for an hour and a half. FROMBERG: I think that's what he said. Commissioner Arkin. ARKIN: I think that you talking about so few units in these phases. You' re talking 44 units, 200 units. It's very minor. I think what Lou is telling you is that the initial impact has to be fantastic and then the lower income housing will appear in the smaller lots inside and that will be where you' ll start housing those people but I'm sure it's a necessity to create the environment that will bring people here. GOODKIN: It really is. It's a situation where we have to give people a reason. If it's pricing in itself, they have lots of alternatives. What we have to do is give them an alternative from the standpoint of the product and the environment. I think starting with our marina project. . .we have all the basis, the cultural opportunities here, the proximitey to work, the fact that a Rouse, . . .what they're going to do is going to enhance our situation. It's not going to compete with i t. ARKIN: I think it's do-able. GOODKIN: Yes. So we're very positive about that. The other thing, of course, we identify in here which is a pretty critical subject is that unlike the gentrification programs that typically have occurred in urban areas where they' re trying to enhance them. We have very high land costs in South Beach. M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 14 0 i"45 6 GOODKIN (Cont'd: I mean, the people are talking about prices that are higher than areas that are considered to he quite desirable that are north of us. That's the problem because it's one thing to talk about moderate price housing and it's another thing to say if people are talking about $15 and $20 a square foot numbers you can't address moderate price housing. So that's an area we have to be very sensitive in attacking. ARKIN: It's going to be our biggest problem. FROMBERG: Gentlemen, we have to move along. Any other questions of Mr. Goodkin? WEISBURD: Wish you lots of luck. SHOCKETT: I would like just one other comment. You can't really just talk in terms of price. A $100,000 home with suitable financing, with a low down payment and a long term mortgage can be something that's very affordable. So those things enter into it as well. GOODKIN: Plus the fact there are some people. . .I mean, if you look at what has happened in the Grove, as an example, which I remember sitting in meetings when there was a lot of concern about the Grove. I remember when we did a townhome project there how we made 15 foot walls and security and all of the things that were concerned there and the Grove has become, in a very short period of time, a highly desirable high ticket item, getting people from the Gables that lived in bigger houses and has one of the best mixes as far as market. You have Latin, you have Jewish, and you have non-ethnic population have responded to the communities there which is quite unusual. Hasn't occurred. I think we do have that opportunity. FROMBERG: Okay, thank you. The main message is that there is a demand out there for what you're proposing and that's the encouraging. . . . . .Mr. Fosmoen. FOSMOEN: Two other aspects. One is the commercial and office market and the other is the financing packages that we will be presenting to developers in conference. Let me introduce Bill Mahers from Halcyon. BILL MAHERS: I just want to say that Halcyon is really encouraged to hear. Lou Goodkin's remarks and part of what we're looking at requires a strong residential base particularly the retail component, though his positive findings are really helping us out. Just to summarize, we think the long term. . . . FROMBERG: Excuse me dust one second. Are we going to get a copy of the report that you were referring to, Mr. Goodkin? Okay, thank you. Please. MAHERS: We think the long term prospects for office development in South Pointe area are very good. We've been researching this for about two months now and have been working in Miami for about two or three years. What we envision is a series of 60,000 to 120,000 square foot buildings along Miami Beach Boulevard starting at the Biscayne Bay side, and we've been working closely with Land Design Research. You see these types of buildings and the placement of them reflect in the plans that Sy Paumier was showing. Basically two sources demand for the office space in the South Pointe area. First there's corporate offices and that includes both front office space and back office space. Let me just explain that a little bit. Front office space is a headquarters situation where a company would want to put a regional headquarters, or a local company who would want to build its headquarters in the South Pointe area. There is demand for that and just as an aside there are several major corporations currently considering the South Pointe area as an office location and the City is working closely with them. In addition, there's the back office space concept which is the clerical and commputer operations of financial institutions. At the current time it looks like that's not a viable demand segment because companies like to put these offices near where their employees live and basically they' re going to the West Dade area. But as the area develops as a major residential . . . as the infill developments succeed and as the Cheezem development and the other developments we' re talking about work, it will become a significant residential area and therefore could support back office space. M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 15 60 000457 MAHERS (Cont'd) : The second component of the office market is professional companies including lawyers, accountants, consultants, architects, and they kind of fall into the same category as the back office space and we certainly can see them moving to a mixed use, high amenity with the marina and the shops there, that sort of environment. They will be looking for a residential base; and just to qualify that a little bit, we do think that Cheezem's development and the demand that the Goodkin Company's been able to find, we think there will be a residential base established in fairly short order and we're looking. . , we think that the office market will benefit significantly from that. A couple of steps are needed to attract this demand. First of all, for the corporate headquarters and corporate space, you need available land, infrastructure improvements, including parking, a good image and visibility coming off the causeway, but all in all we think Miami Beach Boulevard is a good location for this type of corporate development. And as I said in the professional office market you need high quality residential and retail environment to make this an attractive mixed-use environment. On the retail side and what we're looking at and what we're recommending is that we envision and we're pretty confident about, creating a restaurant district in the southern part of South Pointe, building on Joe's Stone Crab and Crawdaddy's which is going to be built in the new park. We think there could easily be five or six high quality restaurants that would attract people from all over Dade County to come to the South Pointe area. Joe's Stone Crab already does a great business for six months of the year and the fact that people are willing to come to the area now, we think that if it was fixed up in the way it's supposed to be fixed up, it' ll become just a great restaurant district, not so much competing with Bayside which will be more fast food oriented than restaurant. And then, finally, we see a demand for about approximately 100,000 square feet of service retail catering to the local residents that move to the South Pointe area and this is your groceries, dry cleaners, all sorts of day-to-day retail needs that they're going to need as they move in. That's it. FROMBERG: Thank you. Any questions? Thank you very much. It looks like everything is encouraging. PARKINS: As we had expected, sir. FOSMOEN: Barry Rappaport will follow. BARRY RAPPAPORT: One of the major things we want to do out of our study was to take market information and the design ideas and apply them to actual specific sites. We want to avoid condemnation at all costs and would like to try to work with the existing landowners or the existing city land to try to be able to offer to a developer, at a price so that he could build his product to meet this demand. We have gone and talked to a lot of the landowners about what their prices are and what they're visions are for the area and we've gotten a lot of support to be involved in having their properties offered out to the development community. We've come up with that there are some people who have a little bit of a high value for their land but in general we look at the consistent average square foot land price. Most of the project can be basically feasible. However, because we' re searching for higher housing costs, because the office market isn't established, in the initial couple of developments we are coming through to recognize that there's going to be a need to write down the land cost a portion, similar to what is called UDAG gap financing that is done on a Federal basis as well as provide community parking that will allow some of the developments not to have to bear that parking cost on their project. Right now, working through those numbers that we could give the developers confidence that not only do we like the market and the design plan but that when they do come in here that they can make a reasonable profit competitive with other project opportunities they have around the area. GRENALD: (Inaudible - off microphone) RAPPAPORT: We don' t expect to use UDAG. We expect to use the available resources and tax increment financing and perhaps within the parking bonding M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 16 60 00045 RAPPAPORT (Cont'd) : capacity of the City in the same technique. What TTSA G Psubsidy tries to do is use the minimum amount of public e necessary to leverage most amount of private development that you would expect to recommend. FROMBERG: Okay, Gentlemen, any other questions? Thank you. FOSMOEN: One comment, Mr. Mayor, which is really a policy recommendation to the Commission and we've discussed it with the South Pointe Subcommittee well as some of the Commi tt ies of RMB as There was considerable discussion about trying to relocate the South Shore ElementarySchool. I all picked up in SyPaumier's � hope that you presentation that we're beginning to believe that that property should be preserved and renovated where it is. discussion about trying to relocate it to There was the police station site. I can get into a long dissertation with you about opportunities but ut we think that there's a greater opportunity to preserve that school, and in fact use the police station site as a development opportunityrather than ' long ardguous battle of acquiring fighting that q g additional land around the police station, getting exemptions from the State to build an undersized school putting a school where it maybe a and in fact prime development site. So that's one of the policy kinds of issues that's surfacing through this and to be aware of that. g I just want you FROMBERG: Okay. Mr. Parkins, anything else with regard to your y ur report? PARKINS: The only remaining item was the Housing Authority negotiations. We that they' re currentlydrafting for discussion a contract which incorporates the basic principles that were laid outt' n the letter of understanding that was discussed in January, 1985 witho attempted to contact Mr. Perlin to see if he y u• We have can get a copy of that contract over today in accord with Commissioner Shockett's request. He had to see, I think, a draft of that document q expected today. I don't have an answer for you yet, sir. We will by 2 o'clock. SHOCKETT: Mr. Fromberg, I'd like to comment on thisar.ticul just before I get to it, I do have one otherP ar issue but comment about the South Pointe invitation. I think when they list the Agencymembers that list and name the AgencyAttorneyand they ought to the Agency Secretary. Let me tell you, the last meeting we had a month ago when Mr. Perlin present, they had this letter of intent or memorandum ofwas proposed agreement and we went through it in fair amount of detail with Mr. Perlin to see if the Housing Authority was willing to give, in exchange for concessions from the City, . . . . FROMBERG: Before these gentlemen leave, excuse me. Gentlemen, for your efforts and we thank you for we thank you your report. You' re confirming in a very tangible way what we've been led to believe all along, but I everybody to understand, as I'm sure the Commission want does, that these reports are necessary in order to make a direct positive presentation to developers rather than in theory but in expert opinion and reporting, P P g, and this is, I assume is the basis of the report to the Developers' Conference that's to take place shortly. going PARKINS: That's correct, sir. FROMBERG: We thank you for your work and we'd like to see in writing copies of whatever you make available as soon as it's available. M.B.REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2/20/85 PAGE 17 40 000459