Loading...
Ameresco-Inc.-Annual-Reconciliation-Reports-Review-9-28-17MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, l 700 Convention Center Drive , Miomi Beach , Florido 3 Office of Internal Audi t Tel : 305-673-7020 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PERIOD(S): Jimmy L. Morales. City Manager James J. Sutter, Internal Auditor MC Septembe r 28, 2017 Amer esco Inc . -Annual Re c onc i l iation Rep o rts Re v iew October 1, 2012 -September 30 , 2016 (Power Consumption) January 1, 2011 -December 31 , 2016 (Water Consumption) This report is the result of a Property Management Department request to review the four (4) Annual Reconciliation Reports (ARRs) submitted by Ameresco Inc. to date under their signed Energy Service Agreement with the City and to dete rmine whether power and water savings when compared to the baseline are being realized . INTRODU CTION Ameresco Inc. (Ameresco) was founded in 2000 with the stated objective of providing energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions according to their website . On August 12, 2008 the City and Ameresco signed an Energy Audit Agreement to assess City owned and operated buildings to identify projections of energy and potential cost savings as a result of the installation of recommended energy conservation measures which consisted of more energy efficient devices and appliances, as well as the feasibility of implementing alternate energy generation projects. The Energy Audit Agreement would also help to deve lop an annual average consumption base to be used as comparison baseline in the Annual Reconciliation Reports or AR Rs. On May 25, 2010 the Energy Service Agreement was adopted whereby Ameresco was to design, procure , fabricate , and install specified Energy Conservation Measu res (ECMs) and provide training, commissioning , maintenance and monitoring . The related capital improvements were procured between July 2010 and Septembe r 2012 at a cost of $13 ,697,733.97 and they were classified into the following six ECMs: • ECM-1 Facility Lighting Upgrades -Installing energy efficient lights and fixtures . • ECM-3 Domestic Water Conservation -Installing water efficient toilets , faucets, showe rheads , sinks, ice machines, laundry facilities, etc. to reduce their consumption levels. • ECM-5 HVAC Contro ls -(HVAC =H eati ng Ventilation & Air Conditioning) Installing new thermostats , controllers, sensors, low leak dampers, etc. that will be linked into one (1) energy management system and upgraded so that building monitoring and controls are more easily undertaken and energy conservation is achieved as a result. • ECM -6 District Cooling Plant -New optimization panels and software, valves, water pumps, etc. to provide a geothermal source to enhance the efficiency of the cooling plant and to expand the cooling system to incorporate the distribution of chilled water to City Hall, the new multi-purpose City garage and eventually the 777 Building. We ore committed to providing excellent public service ond sofeo/ lo oil who live. work. ond play In our vibront, tropical, historic community. Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017 Page 2 of 5 • ECM-7 Geothermal Cooling - Police – New heat exchangers, valves, pumps, etc. to increase the efficiency of the Police Department chilling mechanism thereby reducing energy consumption. • ECM-10 Transformer Replacement – Replace to more efficient dry power transformers. Exhibit C of the Energy Service Agreement also stipulates that by the issuance of the Final Delivery and Acceptance Certificate which represents capital improvement project conclusion that the City is to remit an annual fee for maintenance savings measurement and verification, and post-acceptance training services. As a result, the City was to remit thirteen annual service and maintenance payments starting at $81,770 and increasing by 3% per year for a potential total of $1,277,069. By this report's date, service and maintenance fees of $338,168 were paid as shown in the table below: Year Fiscal Year Check # Check Date Amount 1 10/01/12 - 09/30/13 355079 01/07/2014 $ 81,771 2 10/01/13 – 09/30/14 372861 03/31/2015 84,223 3 * 10/01/14 – 09/30/15 384415 12/22/2015 84,848 4 10/01/15 – 09/30/16 413876 05/11/2017 87,326 Total $ 338,168 * Amendment #1 to the Energy Service Agreement was entered into on March 4, 2016 which among other items modified ECM-6 as Ameresco was to decommission the Geothermal System at its sole cost and expense so the maintenance charges were reduced starting in year 3 plus year 13’s payment was deleted. A listing of the updated service and maintenance fees for the duration of the agreement can be found in Exhibit D of Amendment #1. The City is contractually obligated to remit an additional eight (8) payments totaling an additional $799,836 over the remaining years of the Energy Service Agreement assuming that the savings objectives were satisfied. According to information provided by one of their Operations Managers, Ameresco has measurement verification protocol that includes the use of statistical sampling techniques for baseline measurement and post-installation measurements of wattage per fixture to determine total energy savings. Ameresco guarantees savings in power, water, and operation and maintenance up to a certain amount each year and in the event of failure to achieve those savings, they will pay the City the difference between the annual amount guaranteed and the actual annual energy and operating cost savings achieved at the premises. All savings related totals to date have been based on assessments made by Ameresco which are recorded in their ARRs filed annually and they have received all the designated service and maintenance fees specified in the signed agreements and amendments. PURPOSE The purpose of this review is to determine whether monies spent in the Energy Service Agreement resulted in the City having lower annual power and water consumption for the tested locations and whether accurate Annual Reconciliation Reports were submitted reflecting the City’s consumption trends. SCOPE Analyze historic actual consumption data obtained from Florida Power & Light and the City’s Financial System for the selected City owned and operated buildings which were subsequently Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017 Page 3 of 5 compared to the corresponding data listed in Ameresco Inc.’s submitted Annual Reconciliation Reports. ANALYSIS PERFORMED Ameresco Inc. (Ameresco) properly filed the four (4) Annual Reconciliation Reports (ARRs) required to date under their signed Energy Service Agreement with the City. These ARRs estimate the power and water savings for City owned properties during each October through September fiscal year based on capital improvements costing $13,697,733.97 procured between July 2010 and September 2012. Internal Audit requested on several occasions the supporting documentation for the figures reported in these ARRs but Ameresco only furnished an Excel spreadsheet devoid of formulas which was not helpful. Attempts to compare Ameresco’s estimated savings to the actual consumption figures obtained from Florida Power & Light (FPL) and the City’s Financial System for the audit period were largely unsuccessful due to different reporting formats. Ameresco uses statistical sampling techniques to reach their totals rather than actual consumption. Furthermore, there may be unknown variables which could affect the consumption rates (building modifications, reduced/extended hours of operation, missing meter information, etc.) that would have to be reviewed individually to determine their existence. Lastly, Hurricane Irma impacted the South Florida area in September 2017 and made it difficult to attain additional information as FPL and Public Works Department employees’ time was focused on other more important tasks. Given these facts, Internal Audit could not determine whether the power and water consumption savings actually exceeded the associated costs of the capital improvements ($13,697,733.97) plus the annual service and maintenance payments designated in the Energy Service Agreement and amendment #1 ($1,138,004 = $338,168 paid to date + $799,836 potentially owed during the next eight years). Although other testing was conducted and their results are presented below and in the exhibits located at the end of this report, our primary objective was to obtain and analyze the consumption information for each selected location (26 for power and 24 for water) to help the Property Management Department Administration identify trends so that they could take any needed corrective actions. The following summarized tests were performed which produced the listed results: For power consumption analysis From a total population of 52 City owned and operated locations, 26 were selected for analysis whose power consumption totals were available in each of the four yearly ARRs. Upon request, FPL provided five (5) years of data, which was sorted by fiscal year (October 1st - September 30th) to match Ameresco’s ARR’s approach. Although both kilowatts per hour (kWh) and dollars were requested, FPL only provided kWh so any noted power differences could not be quantified as the corresponding rate was not constant since it increased as the property’s consumption increased. Exhibit A contains a comparison of these 26 locations actual power consumption for the 2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 fiscal years with Ameresco’s calculated 2006 through 2008 baseline consumption. The calculated baseline for each of the locations listed in the Energy Service Audit measured the amount of consumption prior to the capital improvements and served as the benchmark to measure future potential savings. Testing found that the actual power consumption was higher than the baseline in 42 (9 in 2012/13, 10 in 2013/14, 11 in 2014/15 and 12 in 2015/16) of the 104 (26 locations x 4 years) instances tested or 40.38% of Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017 Page 4 of 5 the time. In addition, an analysis of the 26 locations actual power consumption was completed by fiscal year as shown in Exhibit B. The resulting linear trend analysis performed on an annual basis found that five (5) locations power consumption usage remained steady or 19% as the calculated slope fell within the +.01 and -.01 range. Of the remaining 21 locations, there was an upward trend indicating that more power was consumed than in the baseline for ten (10) or 39% locations and a downward consumption trend meaning less power was consumed for the remaining eleven (11) locations or 42%. These slope differences ranged from a maximum upward trend of .182 for the Bayshore Maintenance building located at 2800 North Meridian Avenue to a (.192) downward trend for the Recreation Center formerly located at 2100 Washington Avenue. Meanwhile, Exhibit C initially computes the variances or change in power consumption from the prior year for the data obtained from FPL and Ameresco for the same periods. These variances are netted together to determine the combined variance which was found to exceed 3% in 44 of the 78 tested calculations or 56% of the time which supports our earlier conclusion that Ameresco uses statistical sampling techniques to reach their totals rather than actual consumption. Schedule D calculates the percentage difference between FPL’s actual power consumption and the projected cost savings reported annually by location in Ameresco’s ARRs. It was determined that the corresponding difference exceeded 3% for 52 of the 104 tested transactions or 50%. Schedule E1 through E26 provides a dashboard of each tested location’s power consumption during the audit period by fiscal year. The supporting Excel pivot tables that drive these calculations were given to Property Management Department Administration so that they can continue this analysis going forward. This process will facilitate their monitoring especially since the consumption process is currently decentralized with various City departments/divisions authorizing FPL payments (Parks and Recreation, Fire, etc.). For water consumption analysis Unlike power, water savings were not itemized by location in the submitted ARRs, as they were instead presented globalized in a breakdown entitled "Domestic Water Conservation". Although no individual comparisons were possible, requests were made to the City’s Public Works Department for a listing of the meters that supply water to the 26 sampled power locations. Two (2) locations had to be excluded because no data was provided concerning their water consumption prior Hurricane Irma’s landfall in South Florida since the Public Works Department’s resources were focused on recovery efforts. Finally, Fire Station #2 and Fire Station Maintenance Facility were bundled together as no information could be obtained to segregate their water usage. Based on the data received from the Public Works Department, the relevant meters actual consumption was then captured from the City’s Financial System (keeping calendar year sorting) and entered into Excel pivot tables to facilitate analysis. As a result, testing focused on whether the actual water consumption remained steady, increased or decreased during the six year audit period as shown in Exhibit F. The resulting linear trend analysis performed on an annual basis found that one (1) location’s usage remained steady or 4% as the water consumption’s calculated slope during the reviewed fiscal years fell within the +.01 and -.01 range. Of the remaining locations, there was an upward trend indicating that more water was Internal Audit Memorandum Ameresco Inc. – Report Review Years 1 Through 4 September 28, 2017 Page 5 of 5 consumed than in the baseline for thirteen (13) locations or 57% and a downward consumption trend meaning less power was consumed for the remaining nine (9) locations or 39%. Lastly, Exhibits G1 through G23 provide a dashboard of each tested location’s water consumption during the audit period by fiscal year. The supporting Excel pivot tables that drive these calculations were given to Property Management Department Administration so that they can continue this analysis going forward to facilitate monitoring. JJS:MC:NB Review performed by Assistant Internal Auditor Mark Coolidge and Senior Auditor Norman Blaiotta F:\OBPI\$AUD\INTERNAL AUDIT FILES\DOC16-17\REPORTS - FINAL\Ameresco Draft Report 09-28-17.docx cc: Mark Taxis, Assistant City Manager Eric Carpenter, Assistant City Manager Adrian Morales, Property Management Division Director John Woodruff, Chief Financial Officer FPL Data ‐ Ameresco Baseline Comparison Table Exhibit: A Total kWh per Fiscal Year (FPL) Fiscal Year (Oct 1 through Sept 30) Locations Baseline (See note 2013 2014 2015 2016 Bayshore Maintenance Building 91,069 54,310 62,921 91,844 113,613 Yes City Hall 2,815,309 1,440,720 1,493,880 1,495,440 1,474,080 No Colony Theater 800,520 703,200 788,880 885,840 888,480 Yes Comfort Facility 14,458 31,533 29,732 26,193 16,924 Yes Convention Center 18,421,360 6,509,120 6,242,752 6,442,892 6,355,360 No Crespi Recreation Center 6,610 10,185 10,697 10,079 7,943 Yes Fairway Park Recreation Center 10,380 50,714 47,843 53,115 62,916 Yes Fire Station #1 242,370 261,420 264,720 262,020 243,960 Yes Fire Station #2 458,723 828,360 682,920 672,060 748,980 Yes Fire Station #3 201,102 191,760 201,660 215,820 227,280 Yes Fire Station Maintenance Facility 121,135 91,812 103,562 104,227 102,346 No Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 607,920 494,520 474,360 458,280 446,640 No Muss Park Recreation Center 10,210 10,709 18,041 12,310 10,090 Yes North Shore Community Center 150,009 115,855 112,378 123,987 117,425 No Office Building (777) 742,880 680,320 687,360 728,640 665,120 No Old City Hall 212,263 332,781 337,840 323,880 344,012 Yes Parks Division, Nursery 114,101 116,973 130,228 111,462 119,870 Yes Police Athletic League 461,565 288,720 352,440 384,540 345,360 No Police Station 3,270,840 3,256,560 3,111,600 3,001,680 2,987,760 No Recreation Center (21 Street) 339,120 121,920 139,800 142,800 29,520 No Sailport/Police Substation 387,042 53,152 62,319 61,294 69,128 No South Shore Community Center 516,360 487,080 470,880 421,200 383,520 No Stillwater Park Recreation Center 19,930 9,995 9,016 12,092 10,828 No Tatum Park Recreation Center 14,864 10,983 8,271 13,982 17,450 Yes VCA Building (555) 419,840 576,000 511,440 423,120 434,280 Yes Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 2,563,440 1,902,000 1,780,560 1,576,560 1,674,240 No % of locations per year with consumption higher than  baseline  (% of highlighted)40% Note: Baseline amount is the Ameresco calculated consumption Count % average for the years 2006 through 2008 for each listed location Yes 13 50% No 13 50% Total 26 100% Percentage obtained by adding the 42 highlighted years  (9+10+11+12) which represent those with higher consumption than  baseline and dividing it by the total locations multiplied by the four  years analyzed 104 (26 x 4). Test 1 ‐ Is Any of the FPL's Yearly kWh Totals  Higher Than the Baseline Amount? Test 2 Locations per year with consumption higher than baseline:9 10 11 12 Total:              26 Test 1 Summary Trend Analysis Summary Table ‐ FPL Data Only Exhibit: B Total kWh per Fiscal Year (FPL) Fiscal Year (Oct 1st through Sept 30th) Locations 2013 2014 2015 2016 Slope Trend Bayshore Maintenance Building 54,310 62,921 91,844 113,613 0.182 Upward City Hall 1,440,720 1,493,880 1,495,440 1,474,080 0.007 Steady Colony Theater 703,200 788,880 885,840 888,480 0.073 Upward Comfort Facility 31,533 29,732 26,193 16,924 (0.150)Downward Convention Center 6,509,120 6,242,752 6,442,892 6,355,360 (0.004) Steady Crespi Recreation Center 10,185 10,697 10,079 7,943 (0.069)Downward Fairway Park Recreation Center 50,714 47,843 53,115 62,916 0.067 Upward Fire Station #1 261,420 264,720 262,020 243,960 (0.021)Downward Fire Station #2 828,360 682,920 672,060 748,980 (0.030)Downward Fire Station #3 191,760 201,660 215,820 227,280 0.053 Upward Fire Station Maintenance Facility 91,812 103,562 104,227 102,346 0.031 Upward Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 494,520 474,360 458,280 446,640 (0.032)Downward Muss Park Recreation Center 10,709 18,041 12,310 10,090 (0.042)Downward North Shore Community Center 115,855 112,378 123,987 117,425 0.013 Upward Office Building (777) 680,320 687,360 728,640 665,120 (0.001) Steady Old City Hall 332,781 337,840 323,880 344,012 0.006 Steady Parks Division, Nursery 116,973 130,228 111,462 119,870 (0.008) Steady Police Athletic League 288,720 352,440 384,540 345,360 0.053 Upward Police Station 3,256,560 3,111,600 3,001,680 2,987,760 (0.028)Downward Recreation Center (21 Street) 121,920 139,800 142,800 29,520 (0.192)Downward Sailport/Police Substation 53,152 62,319 61,294 69,128 0.068 Upward South Shore Community Center 487,080 470,880 421,200 383,520 (0.074)Downward Stillwater Park Recreation Center 9,995 9,016 12,092 10,828 0.046 Upward Tatum Park Recreation Center 10,983 8,271 13,982 17,450 0.144 Upward VCA Building (555) 576,000 511,440 423,120 434,280 (0.089)Downward Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 1,902,000 1,780,560 1,576,560 1,674,240 (0.047)Downward Total:26 Trend Count % Upward 10 39% Downward 11 42% Steady 5 19% Total 26 100% Note 1: Slope was calculated through Excel's regression analysis formula, SLOPE (Total kWh consumption,Year). Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are considered steady. For all other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative numbers "(  )" represent downward trends. Yearly Variance Summary Table Exhibit: C Location / Fiscal Year  A Variance from Previous Year in  (FPL) B Variance from Previous Year in %  (Ameresco) C Percentage Points Difference  Between FPL and Ameresco  Variances (A‐B) Is Ameresco's Variance Overstated  When Compared to FPL? (Apply for  Differences Over +/‐3 Percentage  Points) Bayshore Maintenance Building 2013 2014 15.86%‐3.97%19.83 Yes 2015 45.97% 16.34% 29.63 Yes 2016 23.70% 10.78% 12.92 Yes City Hall   2013   2014 3.69% 1.84% 1.85 No 2015 0.10%‐5.33%5.43 Yes 2016 ‐1.43%7.10%‐8.52 Yes Colony Theater   2013   2014 12.18% 14.56%‐2.37 No 2015 12.29% 13.01%‐0.72 No 2016 0.30%‐1.74%2.03 No Comfort Facility   2013   2014 ‐5.71%‐11.31%5.60 Yes 2015 ‐11.90%‐19.42%7.52 Yes 2016 ‐35.39%‐29.83%‐5.56 Yes Convention Center   2013   2014 ‐4.09%‐8.81%4.72 Yes 2015 3.21%‐0.56%3.76 Yes 2016 ‐1.36%‐0.49%‐0.87 No Crespi Recreation Center   2013   2014 5.03% 5.03% 0.00 No 2015 ‐5.78%‐20.37%14.59 Yes 2016 ‐21.19%‐15.51%‐5.68 Yes Fairway Park Recreation Center   2013   2014 ‐5.66%‐6.58%0.92 No 2015 11.02% 5.16% 5.86 Yes 2016 18.45% 25.90%‐7.45 Yes Fire Station #1   2013   2014 1.26% 1.36%‐0.10 No 2015 ‐1.02%‐0.98%‐0.04 No 2016 ‐6.89%‐7.73%0.83 No Fire Station #2   2013   2014 ‐17.56%‐4.39%‐13.17 Yes 2015 ‐1.59%‐8.36%6.77 Yes 2016 11.45% 2.28% 9.17 Yes Fire Station #3   2013   2014 5.16%‐0.69%5.85 Yes 2015 7.02% 0.55% 6.47 Yes 2016 5.31% 6.36%‐1.05 No Fire Station Maintenance Facility   2013   2014 12.80% 15.25%‐2.45 No 2015 0.64%‐12.76%13.40 Yes 2016 ‐1.80%14.13%‐15.93 Yes Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation   2013   2014 ‐4.08%‐30.33%26.25 Yes 2015 ‐3.39%‐4.42%1.03 No 2016 ‐2.54%‐3.35%0.81 No Muss Park Recreation Center   2013   2014 68.47% 47.56% 20.91 Yes 2015 ‐31.77%‐35.50%3.73 Yes 2016 ‐18.03%‐12.57%‐5.46 Yes North Shore Community Center   2013   2014 ‐3.00%1.84%‐4.84 Yes 2015 10.33%‐16.24%26.57 Yes 2016 ‐5.29%7.36%‐12.65 Yes Office Building (777)  2013   2014 1.03% 1.71%‐0.67 No Location / Fiscal Year  A Variance from Previous Year in  (FPL) B Variance from Previous Year in %  (Ameresco) C Percentage Points Difference  Between FPL and Ameresco  Variances (A‐B) Is Ameresco's Variance Overstated  When Compared to FPL? (Apply for  Differences Over +/‐3 Percentage  Points) 2015 6.01% 4.56% 1.45 No 2016 ‐8.72%‐8.08%‐0.64 No Old City Hall   2013   2014 1.52% 2.85%‐1.33 No 2015 ‐4.13%‐11.38%7.25 Yes 2016 6.22% 13.96%‐7.74 Yes Parks Division, Nursery   2013   2014 11.33% 11.08% 0.25 No 2015 ‐14.41%‐22.94%8.53 Yes 2016 7.54% 21.11%‐13.57 Yes Police Athletic League   2013   2014 22.07% 7.90% 14.17 Yes 2015 9.11% 3.62% 5.49 Yes 2016 ‐10.19%‐23.98%13.79 Yes Police Station   2013   2014 ‐4.45%‐4.55%0.10 No 2015 ‐3.53%‐3.55%0.02 No 2016 ‐0.46%‐0.98%0.51 No Recreation Center (21 Street)  2013   2014 14.67% 11.00% 3.67 Yes 2015 2.15% 5.46%‐3.32 Yes 2016 ‐79.33%‐81.87%2.54 No Sailport/Police Substation   2013   2014 17.25%‐55.22%72.47 Yes 2015 ‐1.64%1.14%‐2.78 No 2016 12.78% 19.25%‐6.47 Yes South Shore Community Center   2013   2014 ‐3.33%‐2.90%‐0.43 No 2015 ‐10.55%‐9.38%‐1.17 No 2016 ‐8.95%‐8.82%‐0.12 No Stillwater Park Recreation Center   2013   2014 ‐9.79%‐10.92%1.12 No 2015 34.12% 13.26% 20.85 Yes 2016 ‐10.45%‐3.59%‐6.86 Yes Tatum Park Recreation Center   2013   2014 ‐24.69%‐27.48%2.78 No 2015 69.05% 71.87%‐2.82 No 2016 24.80% 22.36% 2.44 No VCA Building (555)  2013   2014 ‐11.21%4.71%‐15.92 Yes 2015 ‐17.27%11.81%‐29.08 Yes 2016 2.64%‐12.53%15.17 Yes Youth Center (Scott Rakow)  2013   2014 ‐6.38%‐7.72%1.33 No 2015 ‐11.46%‐9.09%‐2.37 No 2016 6.20% 4.92% 1.27 No Total Variances Assessed 78 Total Yes Results 44 % From Total 56% Yearly Total Consumption Summary Table Exhibit: D Location / Fiscal Year A Total Yearly Consumption (FPL) B Total Yearly Consumption (Ameresco) C % Difference Between FPL  and Ameresco Total  Consumption (B‐A)/B Is Ameresco's Calculated Total Consumptio Showing a Difference of Over a 3% Range  When Compared to FPL? (C Within +/‐  3%=No) Bayshore Maintenance Building 2013 54,310 195,332 72.2%Yes 2014 62,921 187,573 66.5%Yes 2015 91,844 218,218 57.9%Yes 2016 113,613 241,749 53.0%Yes City Hall 2013 1,440,720 1,430,520 ‐0.7%No 2014 1,493,880 1,456,800 ‐2.5%No 2015 1,495,440 1,379,220 ‐8.4%Yes 2016 1,474,080 1,477,080 0.2% No Colony Theater 2013 703,200 694,080 ‐1.3%No 2014 788,880 795,120 0.8% No 2015 885,840 898,560 1.4% No 2016 888,480 882,960 ‐0.6%No Comfort Facility 2013 31,533 32,702 3.6%Yes 2014 29,732 29,004 ‐2.5%No 2015 26,193 23,371 ‐12.1%Yes 2016 16,924 16,399 ‐3.2%Yes Convention Center 2013 6,509,120 13,318,640 51.1%Yes 2014 6,242,752 12,144,692 48.6%Yes 2015 6,442,892 12,077,092 46.7%Yes 2016 6,355,360 12,017,844 47.1%Yes Crespi Recreation Center 2013 10,185 10,185 0.0% No 2014 10,697 10,697 0.0% No 2015 10,079 8,518 ‐18.3%Yes 2016 7,943 7,197 ‐10.4%Yes Fairway Park Recreation Center 2013 50,714 49,533 ‐2.4%No 2014 47,843 46,272 ‐3.4%Yes 2015 53,115 48,658 ‐9.2%Yes 2016 62,916 61,262 ‐2.7%No Fire Station #1 2013 261,420 260,700 ‐0.3%No 2014 264,720 264,240 ‐0.2%No 2015 262,020 261,660 ‐0.1%No 2016 243,960 241,440 ‐1.0%No Fire Station #2 2013 828,360 672,720 ‐23.1%Yes 2014 682,920 643,200 ‐6.2%Yes 2015 672,060 589,440 ‐14.0%Yes 2016 748,980 602,880 ‐24.2%Yes Fire Station #3 2013 191,760 218,671 12.3%Yes 2014 201,660 217,173 7.1%Yes 2015 215,820 218,375 1.2% No 2016 227,280 232,264 2.1% No Fire Station Maintenance Facility 2013 91,812 90,561 ‐1.4%No 2014 103,562 104,372 0.8% No 2015 104,227 91,052 ‐14.5%Yes 2016 102,346 103,914 1.5% No Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 2013 494,520 694,080 28.8%Yes 2014 474,360 483,600 1.9% No 2015 458,280 462,240 0.9% No 2016 446,640 446,760 0.0% No Muss Park Recreation Center 2013 10,709 11,927 10.2%Yes 2014 18,041 17,599 ‐2.5%No 2015 12,310 11,352 ‐8.4%Yes 2016 10,090 9,925 ‐1.7%No North Shore Community Center 2013 115,855 224,906 48.5%Yes 2014 112,378 229,038 50.9%Yes 2015 123,987 191,842 35.4%Yes 2016 117,425 205,960 43.0%Yes Office Building (777) 2013 680,320 683,360 0.4% No 2014 687,360 695,040 1.1% No 2015 728,640 726,720 ‐0.3%No Location / Fiscal Year A Total Yearly Consumption (FPL) B Total Yearly Consumption (Ameresco) C % Difference Between FPL  and Ameresco Total  Consumption (B‐A)/B Is Ameresco's Calculated Total Consumptio Showing a Difference of Over a 3% Range  When Compared to FPL? (C Within +/‐  3%=No) 2016 665,120 668,000 0.4% No Old City Hall 2013 332,781 328,491 ‐1.3%No 2014 337,840 337,840 0.0% No 2015 323,880 299,391 ‐8.2%Yes 2016 344,012 341,176 ‐0.8%No Parks Division, Nursery 2013 116,973 116,416 ‐0.5%No 2014 130,228 129,316 ‐0.7%No 2015 111,462 99,656 ‐11.8%Yes 2016 119,870 120,693 0.7% No Police Athletic League 2013 288,720 217,643 ‐32.7%Yes 2014 352,440 234,832 ‐50.1%Yes 2015 384,540 243,324 ‐58.0%Yes 2016 345,360 184,979 ‐86.7%Yes Police Station 2013 3,256,560 3,256,560 0.0% No 2014 3,111,600 3,108,480 ‐0.1%No 2015 3,001,680 2,998,080 ‐0.1%No 2016 2,987,760 2,968,800 ‐0.6%No Recreation Center (21 Street) 2013 121,920 372,000 67.2%Yes 2014 139,800 412,920 66.1%Yes 2015 142,800 435,480 67.2%Yes 2016 29,520 78,960 62.6%Yes Sailport/Police Substation 2013 53,152 439,317 87.9%Yes 2014 62,319 196,711 68.3%Yes 2015 61,294 198,947 69.2%Yes 2016 69,128 237,242 70.9%Yes South Shore Community Center 2013 487,080 480,720 ‐1.3%No 2014 470,880 466,800 ‐0.9%No 2015 421,200 423,000 0.4% No 2016 383,520 385,680 0.6% No Stillwater Park Recreation Center 2013 9,995 9,995 0.0% No 2014 9,016 8,904 ‐1.3%No 2015 12,092 10,085 ‐19.9%Yes 2016 10,828 9,723 ‐11.4%Yes Tatum Park Recreation Center 2013 10,983 11,049 0.6% No 2014 8,271 8,013 ‐3.2%Yes 2015 13,982 13,772 ‐1.5%No 2016 17,450 16,852 ‐3.5%Yes VCA Building (555) 2013 576,000 232,800 ‐147.4%Yes 2014 511,440 243,760 ‐109.8%Yes 2015 423,120 272,560 ‐55.2%Yes 2016 434,280 238,400 ‐82.2%Yes Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 2013 1,902,000 1,894,080 ‐0.4%No 2014 1,780,560 1,747,920 ‐1.9%No 2015 1,576,560 1,589,040 0.8% No 2016 1,674,240 1,667,280 ‐0.4%No Total Variances Assessed 104 Total Yes Results 52 % From Total 50% Ba y s h o r e  Ma i n t e n a n c e  Bu i l d i n g Exhibit: E1 Ad d r e s s : 28 0 0  N  ME R I D I A N  AV E  # ST A T I O N Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  15 0 2 4 4 2 0 8 8        62 0 1 7 7 6 0 2 5      AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 5 4 , 3 1 0 2 4 1 9 5 , 3 3 2 72.2% 20 1 4 6 2 , 9 2 1 2 4 15 . 8 6 % 18 7 , 5 7 3 ‐3. 9 7 % 19 . 8 3 Y e s 6 6 . 5 % 20 1 5 9 1 , 8 4 4 2 4 45 . 9 7 % 21 8 , 2 1 8 16 . 3 4 % 29 . 6 3 Y e s 5 7 . 9 % 20 1 6 1 1 3 , 6 1 3 2 4 23 . 7 0 % 24 1 , 7 4 9 10 . 7 8 % 12 . 9 2 Y e s 5 3 . 0 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.182 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.070 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Bayshore  Maintenance   Bu i l d i n g  di f f e r s  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports  presented  differences  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2.  Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  an  up w a r d  slope. No t e :  Th i s  is  a  mu l t i p l e ‐ac c o u n t  lo c a t i o n .  Co n c l u s i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  th e  su m  of  al l  ac c o u n t s .  Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 54 , 3 1 0 6 2 , 9 2 1 9 1 , 8 4 4 1 1 3 , 6 1 3 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 19 5 , 3 3 2 1 8 7 , 5 7 3 2 1 8 , 2 1 8 2 4 1 , 7 4 9 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Ci t y  Ha l l Exhibit: E2 Ad d r e s s : 17 0 0  Co n v e n t i o n    Ce n t e r  Dr i v e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  65 3 1 1 7 9 3 9 5        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 , 4 4 0 , 7 2 0 1 2 1 , 4 3 0 , 5 2 0 ‐0.7% 20 1 4 1 , 4 9 3 , 8 8 0 1 2 3. 6 9 % 1, 4 5 6 , 8 0 0 1. 8 4 % 1. 8 5 N o ‐2.5% 20 1 5 1 , 4 9 5 , 4 4 0 1 2 0. 1 0 % 1, 3 7 9 , 2 2 0 ‐5. 3 3 % 5. 4 3 Y e s ‐8.4% 20 1 6 1 , 4 7 4 , 0 8 0 1 2 ‐1. 4 3 % 1, 4 7 7 , 0 8 0 7. 1 0 % ‐8. 5 2 Y e s 0 . 2 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.007 Trend:Stead y Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.004 Trend:Stead y Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  City  Hall  does  not  differ   si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  fe l l  wi t h i n  th e  steady  range.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐6. 0 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 6. 0 0 % 8. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 1, 4 4 0 , 7 2 0 1 , 4 9 3 , 8 8 0 1 , 4 9 5 , 4 4 0 1 , 4 7 4 , 0 8 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 1, 4 3 0 , 5 2 0 1 , 4 5 6 , 8 0 0 1 , 3 7 9 , 2 2 0 1 , 4 7 7 , 0 8 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Co l o n y  Th e a t e r Exhibit: E3 Ad d r e s s : 10 4 0 ‐10 5 0  Li n c o l n  Ro a d Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  58 9 9 7 1 3 1 1 8        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 7 0 3 , 2 0 0 1 2 6 9 4 , 0 8 0 ‐1.3% 20 1 4 7 8 8 , 8 8 0 1 2 12 . 1 8 % 79 5 , 1 2 0 14 . 5 6 % ‐2. 3 7 N o 0 . 8 % 20 1 5 8 8 5 , 8 4 0 1 2 12 . 2 9 % 89 8 , 5 6 0 13 . 0 1 % ‐0. 7 2 N o 1 . 4 % 20 1 6 8 8 8 , 4 8 0 1 2 0. 3 0 % 88 2 , 9 6 0 ‐1. 7 4 % 2. 0 3 N o ‐0.6% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.073 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.075 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Colony  Theatre  does  not   di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  an  up w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐4. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 6. 0 0 % 8. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 12 . 0 0 % 14 . 0 0 % 16 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 70 3 , 2 0 0 7 8 8 , 8 8 0 8 8 5 , 8 4 0 8 8 8 , 4 8 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 69 4 , 0 8 0 7 9 5 , 1 2 0 8 9 8 , 5 6 0 8 8 2 , 9 6 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 70 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 90 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Co m f o r t  Fa c i l i t y Exhibit: E4 Ad d r e s s : 46 2 1  Co l l i n s  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  43 8 4 4 3 1 3 5 1        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 3 1 , 5 3 3 1 2 3 2 , 7 0 2 3.6% 20 1 4 2 9 , 7 3 2 1 2 ‐5. 7 1 % 29 , 0 0 4 ‐11 . 3 1 % 5. 6 0 Y e s ‐2.5% 20 1 5 2 6 , 1 9 3 1 2 ‐11 . 9 0 % 23 , 3 7 1 ‐19 . 4 2 % 7. 5 2 Y e s ‐12.1% 20 1 6 1 6 , 9 2 4 1 2 ‐35 . 3 9 % 16 , 3 9 9 ‐29 . 8 3 % ‐5. 5 6 Y e s ‐3.2% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.150 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.167 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Comfort  Facility  does  not   di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports   presented  differences  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2. Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐35 . 0 0 % ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐25 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 31 , 5 3 3 2 9 , 7 3 2 2 6 , 1 9 3 1 6 , 9 2 4 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 32 , 7 0 2 2 9 , 0 0 4 2 3 , 3 7 1 1 6 , 3 9 9 0 5, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 25 , 0 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 35 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Co n v e n t i o n  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E5 Ad d r e s s : 19 0 1  CO N V E N T I O N  CE N T E R  DR Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  90 7 2 1 7 6 4 3 2        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 6 , 5 0 9 , 1 2 0 1 2 1 3 , 3 1 8 , 6 4 0 51.1% 20 1 4 6 , 2 4 2 , 7 5 2 1 2 ‐4. 0 9 % 12 , 1 4 4 , 6 9 2 ‐8. 8 1 % 4. 7 2 Y e s 4 8 . 6 % 20 1 5 6 , 4 4 2 , 8 9 2 1 2 3. 2 1 % 12 , 0 7 7 , 0 9 2 ‐0. 5 6 % 3. 7 6 Y e s 4 6 . 7 % 20 1 6 6 , 3 5 5 , 3 6 0 1 2 ‐1. 3 6 % 12 , 0 1 7 , 8 4 4 ‐0. 4 9 % ‐0. 8 7 N o 4 7 . 1 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.004 )Trend:Stead y Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.030 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Convention  Center  differs   si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2014  and  2015) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2. Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d  sh o w s  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e  ag a i n s t  a  steady  trend  showed  from  FPL.  This  represents   a  hi g h e r  co n s u m p t i o n  tr e n d  (u n f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐8. 0 0 % ‐6. 0 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 6, 5 0 9 , 1 2 0 6 , 2 4 2 , 7 5 2 6 , 4 4 2 , 8 9 2 6 , 3 5 5 , 3 6 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 13 , 3 1 8 , 6 4 0 1 2 , 1 4 4 , 6 9 2 1 2 , 0 7 7 , 0 9 2 1 2 , 0 1 7 , 8 4 4 0 2, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 14 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Cr e s p i  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E6 Ad d r e s s : 78 0 0  Cr e s p i  Ro a d Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  64 1 1 1 8 2 5 8 4        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 0 , 1 8 5 1 2 1 0 , 1 8 5 0.0% 20 1 4 1 0 , 6 9 7 1 2 5. 0 3 % 10 , 6 9 7 5. 0 3 % 0. 0 0 N o 0 . 0 % 20 1 5 1 0 , 0 7 9 1 2 ‐5. 7 8 % 8, 5 1 8 ‐20 . 3 7 % 14 . 5 9 Y e s ‐18.3% 20 1 6 7 , 9 4 3 1 2 ‐21 . 1 9 % 7, 1 9 7 ‐15 . 5 1 % ‐5. 6 8 Y e s ‐10.4% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.069 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.104 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Crespi  Rec  Center  did  not   di f f e r  fo r  th e  fi r s t  tw o  ye a r s  an d  sl i g h t l y  di f f e r s  in  th e  la s t  tw o  ye a r s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FPL's  provided  data. Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐25 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 10 , 1 8 5 1 0 , 6 9 7 1 0 , 0 7 9 7 , 9 4 3 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 10 , 1 8 5 1 0 , 6 9 7 8 , 5 1 8 7 , 1 9 7 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Fa i r w a y  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E7 Ad d r e s s : 20 0  FA I R W A Y  DR Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  39 0 9 2 2 0 3 8 0        58 8 8 4 2 0 2 2 0        89 7 7 4 7 7 1 9 2    AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 5 0 , 7 1 4 3 6 4 9 , 5 3 3 ‐2.4% 20 1 4 4 7 , 8 4 3 3 6 ‐5. 6 6 % 46 , 2 7 2 ‐6. 5 8 % 0. 9 2 N o ‐3.4% 20 1 5 5 3 , 1 1 5 3 6 11 . 0 2 % 48 , 6 5 8 5. 1 6 % 5. 8 6 Y e s ‐9.2% 20 1 6 6 2 , 9 1 6 3 6 18 . 4 5 % 61 , 2 6 2 25 . 9 0 % ‐7. 4 5 Y e s ‐2.7% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.067 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.061 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Fairway  Park  Recreation   Ce n t e r  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :    Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d  sh o w e d  an  up w a r d  sl o p e . No t e :  Th i s  is  a  mu l t i p l e ‐ac c o u n t  lo c a t i o n .  Co n c l u s i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  th e  su m  of  al l  ac c o u n t s .  Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 25 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 50 , 7 1 4 4 7 , 8 4 3 5 3 , 1 1 5 6 2 , 9 1 6 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 49 , 5 3 3 4 6 , 2 7 2 4 8 , 6 5 8 6 1 , 2 6 2 0 10 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 60 , 0 0 0 70 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Fi r e  St a t i o n  #1 Exhibit: E8 Ad d r e s s : 10 5 1  Je f f e r s o n  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  75 2 7 1 7 5 3 5 5        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 2 6 1 , 4 2 0 1 2 2 6 0 , 7 0 0 ‐0.3% 20 1 4 2 6 4 , 7 2 0 1 2 1. 2 6 % 26 4 , 2 4 0 1. 3 6 % ‐0. 1 0 N o ‐0.2% 20 1 5 2 6 2 , 0 2 0 1 2 ‐1. 0 2 % 26 1 , 6 6 0 ‐0. 9 8 % ‐0. 0 4 N o ‐0.1% 20 1 6 2 4 3 , 9 6 0 1 2 ‐6. 8 9 % 24 1 , 4 4 0 ‐7. 7 3 % 0. 8 3 N o ‐1.0% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.021 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.023 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Fire  Station  #1  does  not   di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  sl i g h t l y  downward  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐9. 0 0 % ‐8. 0 0 % ‐7. 0 0 % ‐6. 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐3. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % ‐1. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 26 1 , 4 2 0 2 6 4 , 7 2 0 2 6 2 , 0 2 0 2 4 3 , 9 6 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 26 0 , 7 0 0 2 6 4 , 2 4 0 2 6 1 , 6 6 0 2 4 1 , 4 4 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Fi r e  St a t i o n  #2 Exhibit: E9 Ad d r e s s : 23 0 0  PI N E  TR E E  DR  #A D M I N Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  23 5 5 2 3 7 3 0 2        72 2 4 7 2 5 5 3 6      AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 8 2 8 , 3 6 0 2 4 6 7 2 , 7 2 0 ‐23.1% 20 1 4 6 8 2 , 9 2 0 2 4 ‐17 . 5 6 % 64 3 , 2 0 0 ‐4. 3 9 % ‐13 . 1 7 Y e s ‐6.2% 20 1 5 6 7 2 , 0 6 0 2 4 ‐1. 5 9 % 58 9 , 4 4 0 ‐8. 3 6 % 6. 7 7 Y e s ‐14.0% 20 1 6 7 4 8 , 9 8 0 2 4 11 . 4 5 % 60 2 , 8 8 0 2. 2 8 % 9. 1 7 Y e s ‐24.2% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.030 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.039 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Fire  Station  #2  differs   si g n i f i c a n t l y  (p a r t i c u l a r l y  in  20 1 3  an d  20 1 6 )  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports   presented  differences  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2.  Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  sl i g h t l y  downward  slope. No t e :  Th i s  is  a  mu l t i p l e ‐ac c o u n t  lo c a t i o n .  Co n c l u s i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  th e  su m  of  al l  ac c o u n t s .  Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 82 8 , 3 6 0 6 8 2 , 9 2 0 6 7 2 , 0 6 0 7 4 8 , 9 8 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 67 2 , 7 2 0 6 4 3 , 2 0 0 5 8 9 , 4 4 0 6 0 2 , 8 8 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 70 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 90 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Fi r e  St a t i o n  #3 Exhibit: E10 Ad d r e s s : 53 0 5  Co l l i n s  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  25 3 8 6 7 5 3 7 8        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 9 1 , 7 6 0 1 2 2 1 8 , 6 7 1 12.3% 20 1 4 2 0 1 , 6 6 0 1 2 5. 1 6 % 21 7 , 1 7 3 ‐0. 6 9 % 5. 8 5 Y e s 7 . 1 % 20 1 5 2 1 5 , 8 2 0 1 2 7. 0 2 % 21 8 , 3 7 5 0. 5 5 % 6. 4 7 Y e s 1 . 2 % 20 1 6 2 2 7 , 2 8 0 1 2 5. 3 1 % 23 2 , 2 6 4 6. 3 6 % ‐1. 0 5 N o 2 . 1 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.053 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.018 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Fire  Station  #3  does  not   di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  (e x c e p t  fo r  20 1 3 )  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2014  and  2015) presented   di f f e r e n c e s  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .   FPL  and  Ameresco's  variances  can  also  be  observed   in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  up w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐2. 0 0 % ‐1. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 1. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 3. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 6. 0 0 % 7. 0 0 % 8. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 19 1 , 7 6 0 2 0 1 , 6 6 0 2 1 5 , 8 2 0 2 2 7 , 2 8 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 21 8 , 6 7 1 2 1 7 , 1 7 3 2 1 8 , 3 7 5 2 3 2 , 2 6 4 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Fi r e  St a t i o n  Ma i n t e n a n c e  Fa c i l i t y Exhibit: E11 Ad d r e s s : 23 0 0  Pi n e t r e e  Dr i v e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  59 3 6 7 7 3 7 0        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 9 1 , 8 1 2 1 2 9 0 , 5 6 1 ‐1.4% 20 1 4 1 0 3 , 5 6 2 1 2 12 . 8 0 % 10 4 , 3 7 2 15 . 2 5 % ‐2. 4 5 N o 0 . 8 % 20 1 5 1 0 4 , 2 2 7 1 2 0. 6 4 % 91 , 0 5 2 ‐12 . 7 6 % 13 . 4 0 Y e s ‐14.5% 20 1 6 1 0 2 , 3 4 6 1 2 ‐1. 8 0 % 10 3 , 9 1 4 14 . 1 3 % ‐15 . 9 3 Y e s 1 . 5 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.031 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.026 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Fire  Station  Maintenance   Fa c i l i t y  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  (w i t h  ex c e p t i o n  of  20 1 5 )  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  data. Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented   di f f e r e n c e s  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .   FPL  and  Ameresco's  variances  can  also  be  observed   in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  sl i g h t l y  upward  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 91 , 8 1 2 1 0 3 , 5 6 2 1 0 4 , 2 2 7 1 0 2 , 3 4 6 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 90 , 5 6 1 1 0 4 , 3 7 2 9 1 , 0 5 2 1 0 3 , 9 1 4 0 20 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 60 , 0 0 0 80 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 12 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Me c h a n i c a l  Ma i n t e n a n c e / S a n i t a t i o n Exhibit: E12 Ad d r e s s : 14 0  Ma c A r t h u r  Ca u s e w a y Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  75 1 9 1 7 6 3 4 6        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 4 9 4 , 5 2 0 1 2 6 9 4 , 0 8 0 28.8% 20 1 4 4 7 4 , 3 6 0 1 2 ‐4. 0 8 % 48 3 , 6 0 0 ‐30 . 3 3 % 26 . 2 5 Y e s 1 . 9 % 20 1 5 4 5 8 , 2 8 0 1 2 ‐3. 3 9 % 46 2 , 2 4 0 ‐4. 4 2 % 1. 0 3 N o 0 . 9 % 20 1 6 4 4 6 , 6 4 0 1 2 ‐2. 5 4 % 44 6 , 7 6 0 ‐3. 3 5 % 0. 8 1 N o 0 . 0 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.032 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.110 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Mechanical   Ma i n t e n a n c e / S a n i t a t i o n  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  (w i t h  ex c e p t i o n  of  20 1 3 )  fr o m  FP L ' s  provided  consumption  data. Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  On e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2014) presented  differences   of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Ameresco's  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2.  Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐35 . 0 0 % ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐25 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 49 4 , 5 2 0 4 7 4 , 3 6 0 4 5 8 , 2 8 0 4 4 6 , 6 4 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 69 4 , 0 8 0 4 8 3 , 6 0 0 4 6 2 , 2 4 0 4 4 6 , 7 6 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 70 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Mu s s  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E13 Ad d r e s s : 44 0 0  Ch a s e  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  15 5 1 6 7 4 3 4 2        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 0 , 7 0 9 1 2 1 1 , 9 2 7 10.2% 20 1 4 1 8 , 0 4 1 1 2 68 . 4 7 % 17 , 5 9 9 47 . 5 6 % 20 . 9 1 Y e s ‐2.5% 20 1 5 1 2 , 3 1 0 1 2 ‐31 . 7 7 % 11 , 3 5 2 ‐35 . 5 0 % 3. 7 3 Y e s ‐8.4% 20 1 6 1 0 , 0 9 0 1 2 ‐18 . 0 3 % 9, 9 2 5 ‐12 . 5 7 % ‐5. 4 6 Y e s ‐1.7% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.042 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.070 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Muss  Park  Recreation   Ce n t e r  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports  presented  differences  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2.  Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐60 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 80 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 10 , 7 0 9 1 8 , 0 4 1 1 2 , 3 1 0 1 0 , 0 9 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 11 , 9 2 7 1 7 , 5 9 9 1 1 , 3 5 2 9 , 9 2 5 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 14 , 0 0 0 16 , 0 0 0 18 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) No r t h  Sh o r e  Co m m u n i t y  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E14 Ad d r e s s : 72 5 1  CO L L I N S  AV E  # BA N D  SH E L L Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  10 0 7 7 3 7 5 6 0        60 7 4 5 8 3 5 2 4        64 0 4 0 9 7 2 3 7    AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 1 5 , 8 5 5 3 6 2 2 4 , 9 0 6 48.5% 20 1 4 1 1 2 , 3 7 8 3 6 ‐3. 0 0 % 22 9 , 0 3 8 1. 8 4 % ‐4. 8 4 Y e s 5 0 . 9 % 20 1 5 1 2 3 , 9 8 7 3 6 10 . 3 3 % 19 1 , 8 4 2 ‐16 . 2 4 % 26 . 5 7 Y e s 3 5 . 4 % 20 1 6 1 1 7 , 4 2 5 3 6 ‐5. 2 9 % 20 5 , 9 6 0 7. 3 6 % ‐12 . 6 5 Y e s 4 3 . 0 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.013 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.041 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  North  Shore  Community   Ce n t e r  di f f e r s  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports   presented  a  difference  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variance  differences  can  also  be  observed  in   Ch a r t  2. Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d  sh o w s  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e  ag a i n s t  a  slightly  upward  slope  for  FPL.  This  represents  a   hi g h e r  co n s u m p t i o n  tr e n d  (u n f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . No t e :  Th i s  is  a  mu l t i p l e ‐ac c o u n t  lo c a t i o n .  Co n c l u s i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  th e  su m  of  al l  ac c o u n t s .  Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 11 5 , 8 5 5 1 1 2 , 3 7 8 1 2 3 , 9 8 7 1 1 7 , 4 2 5 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 22 4 , 9 0 6 2 2 9 , 0 3 8 1 9 1 , 8 4 2 2 0 5 , 9 6 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Of f i c e  Bu i l d i n g  (7 7 7 ) Exhibit: E15 Ad d r e s s : 17 0 1  Me r i d i a n  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  84 8 6 1 7 3 0 4        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 6 8 0 , 3 2 0 1 2 6 8 3 , 3 6 0 0.4% 20 1 4 6 8 7 , 3 6 0 1 2 1. 0 3 % 69 5 , 0 4 0 1. 7 1 % ‐0. 6 7 N o 1 . 1 % 20 1 5 7 2 8 , 6 4 0 1 2 6. 0 1 % 72 6 , 7 2 0 4. 5 6 % 1. 4 5 N o ‐0.3% 20 1 6 6 6 5 , 1 2 0 1 2 ‐8. 7 2 % 66 8 , 0 0 0 ‐8. 0 8 % ‐0. 6 4 N o 0 . 4 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.001 )Trend:Stead y Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.002 )Trend:Stead y Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  the  Office  Building  (777)  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  fe l l  wi t h i n  th e  steady  range.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐8. 0 0 % ‐6. 0 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 6. 0 0 % 8. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 68 0 , 3 2 0 6 8 7 , 3 6 0 7 2 8 , 6 4 0 6 6 5 , 1 2 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 68 3 , 3 6 0 6 9 5 , 0 4 0 7 2 6 , 7 2 0 6 6 8 , 0 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 70 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Ol d  Ci t y  Ha l l Exhibit: E16 Ad d r e s s : 11 3 0  Wa s h i n g t o n  Dr i v e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  75 3 4 1 7 6 3 3 9        75 4 2 1 7 5 3 4 9        75 4 3 1 7 3 3 7 6    AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 3 3 2 , 7 8 1 3 6 3 2 8 , 4 9 1 ‐1.3% 20 1 4 3 3 7 , 8 4 0 3 6 1. 5 2 % 33 7 , 8 4 0 2. 8 5 % ‐1. 3 3 N o 0 . 0 % 20 1 5 3 2 3 , 8 8 0 3 6 ‐4. 1 3 % 29 9 , 3 9 1 ‐11 . 3 8 % 7. 2 5 Y e s ‐8.2% 20 1 6 3 4 4 , 0 1 2 3 6 6. 2 2 % 34 1 , 1 7 6 13 . 9 6 % ‐7. 7 4 Y e s ‐0.8% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.006 Trend:Stead y Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.000 )Trend:Stead y Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Old  City  Hall  does  not  differ   si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a  (e x c e p t  fo r  20 1 5 ) . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d s  fe l l  wi t h i n  th e  steady  range. No t e :  Th i s  is  a  mu l t i p l e ‐ac c o u n t  lo c a t i o n .  Co n c l u s i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  th e  su m  of  al l  ac c o u n t s .  Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 33 2 , 7 8 1 3 3 7 , 8 4 0 3 2 3 , 8 8 0 3 4 4 , 0 1 2 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 32 8 , 4 9 1 3 3 7 , 8 4 0 2 9 9 , 3 9 1 3 4 1 , 1 7 6 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 35 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Pa r k s  Di v i s i o n ,  Nu r s e r y Exhibit: E17 Ad d r e s s : 21 0 0  Me r i d i a n  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  15 0 5 6 7 6 3 4 4        16 5 1 5 9 0 0 3 4      AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 1 6 , 9 7 3 2 4 1 1 6 , 4 1 6 ‐0.5% 20 1 4 1 3 0 , 2 2 8 2 4 11 . 3 3 % 12 9 , 3 1 6 11 . 0 8 % 0. 2 5 N o ‐0.7% 20 1 5 1 1 1 , 4 6 2 2 4 ‐14 . 4 1 % 99 , 6 5 6 ‐22 . 9 4 % 8. 5 3 Y e s ‐11.8% 20 1 6 1 1 9 , 8 7 0 2 4 7. 5 4 % 12 0 , 6 9 3 21 . 1 1 % ‐13 . 5 7 Y e s 0 . 7 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.008 )Trend:Stead y Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.013 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Parks  Division  ‐  Nursery   do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a  (e x c e p t  fo r  20 1 5 ) . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d  sh o w s  a  sl i g h t l y  do w n w a r d  sl o p e  versus  a  steady  slope  for  FPL.  This  represents  a   hi g h e r  co n s u m p t i o n  tr e n d  (u n f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . No t e :  Th i s  is  a  mu l t i p l e ‐ac c o u n t  lo c a t i o n .  Co n c l u s i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  th e  su m  of  al l  ac c o u n t s .  Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐25 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 25 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 11 6 , 9 7 3 1 3 0 , 2 2 8 1 1 1 , 4 6 2 1 1 9 , 8 7 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 11 6 , 4 1 6 1 2 9 , 3 1 6 9 9 , 6 5 6 1 2 0 , 6 9 3 0 20 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 60 , 0 0 0 80 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 12 0 , 0 0 0 14 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Po l i c e  At h l e t i c  Le a g u e Exhibit: E18 Ad d r e s s : 99 9  11 T H  ST  # TE N I S  CT R Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  94 8 8 1 7 4 0 8        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 2 8 8 , 7 2 0 4 2 1 7 , 6 4 3 ‐32.7% 20 1 4 3 5 2 , 4 4 0 1 2 22 . 0 7 % 23 4 , 8 3 2 7. 9 0 % 14 . 1 7 Y e s ‐50.1% 20 1 5 3 8 4 , 5 4 0 1 2 9. 1 1 % 24 3 , 3 2 4 3. 6 2 % 5. 4 9 Y e s ‐58.0% 20 1 6 3 4 5 , 3 6 0 1 2 ‐10 . 1 9 % 18 4 , 9 7 9 ‐23 . 9 8 % 13 . 7 9 Y e s ‐86.7% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.053 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.037 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Police  Athletic  League   di f f e r s  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports  presented  differences  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2.  Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  li n e a r  tr e n d  sh o w s  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e  ve r s u s  an  upward  slope  for  FPL.  This  represents  a  higher   co n s u m p t i o n  tr e n d  (u n f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . No t e :  Th e  da t a  pr o v i d e d  by  FP L  in c l u d e d  on l y  4  mo n t h s  fo r  FY  20 1 3  be c a u s e  th i s  is  a  ne w  account.  To  ensure  fairness  in  trend  comparison,  th e  fo u r  mo n t h  co n s u m p t i o n  wa s  ex t r a p o l a t e d  in t o  a  ye a r l y  ba s i s  96 , 2 4 0  x  3  = 22 8 , 7 2 0 ) Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 28 8 , 7 2 0 3 5 2 , 4 4 0 3 8 4 , 5 4 0 3 4 5 , 3 6 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 21 7 , 6 4 3 2 3 4 , 8 3 2 2 4 3 , 3 2 4 1 8 4 , 9 7 9 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 35 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Po l i c e  St a t i o n Exhibit: E19 Ad d r e s s : 11 0 0  Wa s h i n g t o n  Dr i v e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  43 5 2 7 3 3 4 7        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 3 , 2 5 6 , 5 6 0 1 2 3 , 2 5 6 , 5 6 0 0.0% 20 1 4 3 , 1 1 1 , 6 0 0 1 2 ‐4. 4 5 % 3, 1 0 8 , 4 8 0 ‐4. 5 5 % 0. 1 0 N o ‐0.1% 20 1 5 3 , 0 0 1 , 6 8 0 1 2 ‐3. 5 3 % 2, 9 9 8 , 0 8 0 ‐3. 5 5 % 0. 0 2 N o ‐0.1% 20 1 6 2 , 9 8 7 , 7 6 0 1 2 ‐0. 4 6 % 2, 9 6 8 , 8 0 0 ‐0. 9 8 % 0. 5 1 N o ‐0.6% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.028 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.030 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  the  Police  Station  does  not   di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  sh o w e d  a  sl i g h t l y  do w n w a r d  slope.Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐5. 0 0 % ‐4. 5 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐3. 5 0 % ‐3. 0 0 % ‐2. 5 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % ‐1. 5 0 % ‐1. 0 0 % ‐0. 5 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 3, 2 5 6 , 5 6 0 3 , 1 1 1 , 6 0 0 3 , 0 0 1 , 6 8 0 2 , 9 8 7 , 7 6 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 3, 2 5 6 , 5 6 0 3 , 1 0 8 , 4 8 0 2 , 9 9 8 , 0 8 0 2 , 9 6 8 , 8 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 3, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 3, 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  (2 1  St r e e t ) Exhibit: E20 Ad d r e s s : 20 0 0 ‐21 0 0  Wa s h i n g t o n  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  65 3 4 1 7 1 3 7 3        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 2 1 , 9 2 0 1 2 3 7 2 , 0 0 0 67.2% 20 1 4 1 3 9 , 8 0 0 1 2 14 . 6 7 % 41 2 , 9 2 0 11 . 0 0 % 3. 6 7 Y e s 6 6 . 1 % 20 1 5 1 4 2 , 8 0 0 1 2 2. 1 5 % 43 5 , 4 8 0 5. 4 6 % ‐3. 3 2 Y e s 6 7 . 2 % 20 1 6 2 9 , 5 2 0 9 ‐79 . 3 3 % 78 , 9 6 0 ‐81 . 8 7 % 2. 5 4 N o 6 2 . 6 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.192 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.197 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  the  Recreation  Center  (21   St r e e t )  di f f e r s  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2014  & 2015) presented   di f f e r e n c e s  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .   FPL  and  Ameresco's  variances  can  also  be  observed   in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e . No t e :  Th i s  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  wa s  de m o l i s h e d  in  20 1 6 . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐80 . 0 0 % ‐60 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 12 1 , 9 2 0 1 3 9 , 8 0 0 1 4 2 , 8 0 0 2 9 , 5 2 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 37 2 , 0 0 0 4 1 2 , 9 2 0 4 3 5 , 4 8 0 7 8 , 9 6 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 35 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Sa i l p o r t / P o l i c e  Su b s t a t i o n Exhibit: E21 Ad d r e s s : 68 6 0  In d i a n  Cr e e k  Dr i v e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  17 2 2 7 4 8 4 1 3        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 5 3 , 1 5 2 1 2 4 3 9 , 3 1 7 87.9% 20 1 4 6 2 , 3 1 9 1 2 17 . 2 5 % 19 6 , 7 1 1 ‐55 . 2 2 % 72 . 4 7 Y e s 6 8 . 3 % 20 1 5 6 1 , 2 9 4 1 2 ‐1. 6 4 % 19 8 , 9 4 7 1. 1 4 % ‐2. 7 8 N o 6 9 . 2 % 20 1 6 6 9 , 1 2 8 1 2 12 . 7 8 % 23 7 , 2 4 2 19 . 2 5 % ‐6. 4 7 Y e s 7 0 . 9 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.068 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.137 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Sailport/Police  Substation   di f f e r s  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2014  & 2016) presented   di f f e r e n c e s  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .   FPL  and  Ameresco's  variances  can  also  be  observed   in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e  ve r s u s  an  up w a r d  slope  for  FPL.  This  represents  a  higher   co n s u m p t i o n  tr e n d  (u n f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐60 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 53 , 1 5 2 6 2 , 3 1 9 6 1 , 2 9 4 6 9 , 1 2 8 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 43 9 , 3 1 7 1 9 6 , 7 1 1 1 9 8 , 9 4 7 2 3 7 , 2 4 2 0 50 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 35 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) So u t h  Sh o r e  Co m m u n i t y  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E22 Ad d r e s s : 83 3  6  St r e e t Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  75 2 0 1 7 4 3 7 1        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 4 8 7 , 0 8 0 1 2 4 8 0 , 7 2 0 ‐1.3% 20 1 4 4 7 0 , 8 8 0 1 2 ‐3. 3 3 % 46 6 , 8 0 0 ‐2. 9 0 % ‐0. 4 3 N o ‐0.9% 20 1 5 4 2 1 , 2 0 0 1 2 ‐10 . 5 5 % 42 3 , 0 0 0 ‐9. 3 8 % ‐1. 1 7 N o 0 . 4 % 20 1 6 3 8 3 , 5 2 0 1 2 ‐8. 9 5 % 38 5 , 6 8 0 ‐8. 8 2 % ‐0. 1 2 N o 0 . 6 % Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.074 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.068 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  South  Shore  Community   Ce n t e r  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐12 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐8. 0 0 % ‐6. 0 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 48 7 , 0 8 0 4 7 0 , 8 8 0 4 2 1 , 2 0 0 3 8 3 , 5 2 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 48 0 , 7 2 0 4 6 6 , 8 0 0 4 2 3 , 0 0 0 3 8 5 , 6 8 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) St i l l w a t e r  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E23 Ad d r e s s : 84 4 0  Ha w t h o r n e  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  56 7 8 6 4 0 5 9 9        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 9 , 9 9 5 1 2 9 , 9 9 5 0.0% 20 1 4 9 , 0 1 6 1 2 ‐9. 7 9 % 8, 9 0 4 ‐10 . 9 2 % 1. 1 2 N o ‐1.3% 20 1 5 1 2 , 0 9 2 1 2 34 . 1 2 % 10 , 0 8 5 13 . 2 6 % 20 . 8 5 Y e s ‐19.9% 20 1 6 1 0 , 8 2 8 1 2 ‐10 . 4 5 % 9, 7 2 3 ‐3. 5 9 % ‐6. 8 6 Y e s ‐11.4% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.046 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.004 Trend:Stead y Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Stillwater  Park  Recreation   Ce n t e r  di f f e r s  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a  on  ye a r s  20 1 5  an d  20 1 6 . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Tw o  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  (2015  & 2016) presented  a   di f f e r e n c e  of  ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  data.  FPL  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can   al s o  be  ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2. Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  sl o p e  fe l l  wi t h i n  th e  st e a d y  ra n g e  ve r s u s  an  upward  slope  for  FPL.  This  represents   a  higher   co n s u m p t i o n  tr e n d  (u n f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 25 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 35 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 9, 9 9 5 9 , 0 1 6 1 2 , 0 9 2 1 0 , 8 2 8 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 9, 9 9 5 8 , 9 0 4 1 0 , 0 8 5 9 , 7 2 3 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 14 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Ta t u m  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Exhibit: E24 Ad d r e s s : 80 5 0  By r o n  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  36 9 1 5 9 2 3 8 4        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 0 , 9 8 3 1 2 1 1 , 0 4 9 0.6% 20 1 4 8 , 2 7 1 1 2 ‐24 . 6 9 % 8, 0 1 3 ‐27 . 4 8 % 2. 7 8 N o ‐3.2% 20 1 5 1 3 , 9 8 2 1 2 69 . 0 5 % 13 , 7 7 2 71 . 8 7 % ‐2. 8 2 N o ‐1.5% 20 1 6 1 7 , 4 5 0 1 2 24 . 8 0 % 16 , 8 5 2 22 . 3 6 % 2. 4 4 N o ‐3.5% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:0.144 Trend:Upward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.137 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  Tatum  Park  Recreation   Ce n t e r  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  sh o w e d  a  up w a r d  sl o p e . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 80 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 10 , 9 8 3 8 , 2 7 1 1 3 , 9 8 2 1 7 , 4 5 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 11 , 0 4 9 8 , 0 1 3 1 3 , 7 7 2 1 6 , 8 5 2 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 14 , 0 0 0 16 , 0 0 0 18 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) VC A  Bu i l d i n g  (5 5 5 ) Exhibit: E25 Ad d r e s s : 50 5 ‐55 5  17  St r e e t Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  88 1 3 5 3 9 4 2 9        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 5 7 6 , 0 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 , 8 0 0 ‐147.4% 20 1 4 5 1 1 , 4 4 0 1 2 ‐11 . 2 1 % 24 3 , 7 6 0 4. 7 1 % ‐15 . 9 2 Y e s ‐109.8% 20 1 5 4 2 3 , 1 2 0 1 2 ‐17 . 2 7 % 27 2 , 5 6 0 11 . 8 1 % ‐29 . 0 8 Y e s ‐55.2% 20 1 6 4 3 4 , 2 8 0 1 2 2. 6 4 % 23 8 , 4 0 0 ‐12 . 5 3 % 15 . 1 7 Y e s ‐82.2% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.089 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:0.017 Trend:Upward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  the  VCA  Building  (555)  di f f e r s  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  Al l  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Reports  presented  differences  of  over  3   pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  FP L ' s  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e s .    FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o ' s  variances  can  also  be  observed  in  Chart  2.  Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  sh o w e d  a  up w a r d  sl o p e  ve r s u s  a  do w n w a r d  slope  for  FPL.  This  represents  a  lower  consumption   tr e n d  (f a v o r a b l e )  to  th e  Ci t y  th a n  th e  on e  sh o w n  by  Am e r e s c o . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐15 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐5. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 57 6 , 0 0 0 5 1 1 , 4 4 0 4 2 3 , 1 2 0 4 3 4 , 2 8 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 23 2 , 8 0 0 2 4 3 , 7 6 0 2 7 2 , 5 6 0 2 3 8 , 4 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 70 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Yo u t h  Ce n t e r  (S c o t t  Ra k o w ) Exhibit: E26 Ad d r e s s : 27 0 0  Sh e r i d a n  Av e n u e Ac c o u n t  Nu m b e r ( s ) :  15 2 1 6 7 4 3 6 4        AB C D E Te s t  #1 F Fi s c a l  Ye a r  (E n d i n g  Se p t   30 t h ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r  Co n s u m p t i o n   Ba s e d  on  FP L ' s  Da t a Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r V a r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  % (F P L ) To t a l  KW H s  pe r  Ye a r   Co n s u m p t i o n  Ba s e d  on   Am e r e s c o ' s  Da t a Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  in  %  (A m e r e s c o ) Pe r c e n t a g e  Po i n t s  Di f f e r e n c e   Be t w e e n  FP L  an d  Am e r e s c o   Va r i a n c e s  (B ‐D) Do e s  Th e  Ne t  Va r i a n c e  Ex c e e d  Th r e e  (3) Percentage   Po i n t s ? % Difference  Between  FPL  and  Ameresco  Total  Consumption  (C ‐A)/C 20 1 3 1 , 9 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 2 1 , 8 9 4 , 0 8 0 ‐0.4% 20 1 4 1 , 7 8 0 , 5 6 0 1 2 ‐6. 3 8 % 1, 7 4 7 , 9 2 0 ‐7. 7 2 % 1. 3 3 N o ‐1.9% 20 1 5 1 , 5 7 6 , 5 6 0 1 2 ‐11 . 4 6 % 1, 5 8 9 , 0 4 0 ‐9. 0 9 % ‐2. 3 7 N o 0 . 8 % 20 1 6 1 , 6 7 4 , 2 4 0 1 2 6. 2 0 % 1, 6 6 7 , 2 8 0 4. 9 2 % 1. 2 7 N o ‐0.4% Co n c l u s i o n s : FPL Slope & Trend Slope:(0.047 )Trend:Downward Ameresco Slope & Trend Slope:(0.044 )Trend:Downward Note: To t a l  KW H  Co n s u m p t i o n  (I n f o  A,  C,  F  an d  cl u s t e r e d  co l u m n s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Am e r e s c o ' s  to t a l  yearly  consumption  for  the  Youth  Center  (Scott   Ra k o w )  do e s  no t  di f f e r  si g n i f i c a n t l y  fr o m  FP L ' s  pr o v i d e d  co n s u m p t i o n  da t a . Di f f e r e n c e s  on  Ye a r l y  Va r i a n c e  (T e s t  #1 ) :  No n e  of  th e  th r e e  co m p a r a b l e  Am e r e s c o  An n u a l  Reconciliation  Reports  presented  a  difference  of   ov e r  3  pe r c e n t a g e  po i n t s  wh e n  co m p a r e d  to  pr e v i o u s  ye a r  va r i a n c e  fo r  FP L ' s  da t a .    FP L  and  Ameresco's  variance  differences  can  also  be   ob s e r v e d  in  Ch a r t  2.   Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (A r r o w s  in  Ch a r t  1) :  Bo t h  Am e r e s c o  an d  FP L ' s  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  sl o p e . Slopes  within  +0.01  and  ‐0.01  range  are  considered  steady. For  all  other  slopes, positive  numbers  represent  upward  trends  and  negative  numbers  "(  )"represent  downward  trends. ‐14 . 0 0 % ‐12 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % ‐8. 0 0 % ‐6. 0 0 % ‐4. 0 0 % ‐2. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 2. 0 0 % 4. 0 0 % 6. 0 0 % 8. 0 0 % 20 1 4 20 1 5 20 1 6 (C h a r t  2)  Pr e v i o u s  Ye a r  to  Cu r r e n t  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Co m p a r i s o n  Fr o m  FY  20 1 3  to  FY  20 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 20 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 FP L  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 1, 9 0 2 , 0 0 0 1 , 7 8 0 , 5 6 0 1 , 5 7 6 , 5 6 0 1 , 6 7 4 , 2 4 0 Am a r e s c o ' s  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a 1, 8 9 4 , 0 8 0 1 , 7 4 7 , 9 2 0 1 , 5 8 9 , 0 4 0 1 , 6 6 7 , 2 8 0 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 (C h a r t  1)  Po w e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Du r i n g  Th e  Fo u r  An n u a l  Re c o n c i l i a t i o n  Re p o r t s  + Li n e a r  Tr e n d  (F Y  20 1 3  to  FY   20 1 6 ) Exhibit F Total Water Consumption by Calendar Year Calendar Year (January 1st through December 31st) Locations 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 21 Street Recreation Center 2,754 1,223 713 686 715 65 (0.156)Downward Bayshore Maintenance Building 1,369 2,902 2,628 2,096 3,234 2,737 0.065 Upward City Hall 6,816 4,626 3,099 2,275 2,541 3,069 (0.108)Downward Colony Theater 8,142 8,343 9,583 9,595 10,139 11,114 0.052 Upward Comfort Facility 1,987 2,448 1,783 422 572 0 (0.198)Downward Convention Center 72,516 62,104 96,081 64,597 63,026 13,829 (0.096)Downward Crespi Recreation Center 110 308 200 248 369 306 0.094 Upward Fairway Park Recreation Center 33,155 21,837 33,658 28,282 28,994 33,756 0.016 Upward Fire Station #1 20,233 16,029 7,872 2,204 2,641 5,075 (0.172)Downward Fire Station #2 & Fire Station Maintenance Facility 740 938 921 761 786 784 (0.012)Downward Fire Station #3 2,824 2,542 2,474 2,732 3,764 4,628 0.080 Upward Mechanical Maintenance/Sanitation 2,196 1,115 1,501 1,961 2,453 2,560 0.070 Upward North Shore Community Center N/A 814 655 405 3,566 12,863 0.210 Upward Office Building (777) 2,597 5,734 4,559 5,346 5,837 6,845 0.093 Upward Old City Hall 2,821 4,844 3,724 2,701 2,983 3,723 (0.012)Downward Parks Division, Nursery 9,581 4,493 11,685 15,144 14,125 14,918 0.111 Upward Police Athletic League 19,446 13,712 13,876 15,428 18,336 10,987 (0.039)Downward Police Station 32,874 20,708 23,529 28,798 42,658 46,425 0.085 Upward Sailport/Police Substation 366 2,912 1,421 1,418 735 1,065 (0.030)Downward South Shore Community Center 7,691 4,587 5,671 3,614 3,496 8,449 (0.005) Steady Stillwater Park Recreation Center 210 247 63 113 363 328 0.078 Upward Tatum Park Recreation Center 71 233 193 126 214 319 0.100 Upward Youth Center (Scott Rakow) 12,801 17,621 28,498 23,530 38,431 42,158 0.138 Upward Total 23 Trend Count %(See Note 3) Upward 13 57% Downward 93 9% Steady 1 4% Total 23 100% Note 1: VCA Building (555) and Muss Park Recreation Center were part of the sample, but data was not received for these locations. Note 2:  Slope was calculated through Excel's regression analysis formula, SLOPE (Total kWh consumption,Year). Slopes within +0.01 and ‐0.01 range are  considered steady. For all other slopes, positive numbers represent upward trends and negative numbers "(  )"represent downward trends. Note 3: Sum of total locations is 23 because Fire Station #2 and Fire Station Maintenance Facility were bundled as no information to segregate water meters was obtained. dddd Slope Trend Sl o p e : (0 . 1 5 6 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G1 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : 21  St r e e t  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    86 5 1 7 2        97 0 4 2 8 7            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 , 7 5 4 2 4 20 1 2 1 , 2 2 3 ‐55 . 5 9 % 24 20 1 3 7 1 3 ‐41 . 7 0 % 24 20 1 4 6 8 6 ‐3. 7 9 % 24 20 1 5 7 1 5 4. 2 3 % 24 20 1 6 6 5 ‐90 . 9 1 % 24 21  St r e e t  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  sh o w e d  a  steady   do w n w a r d  sl o p e  (t h i s  bu i l d i n g  was  demolished   du e  to  Co n v e n t i o n  Ce n t e r  ex p a n s i o n )    21 0 0  1/ 2  WA S H I N G T O N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 2, 7 5 4 1 , 2 2 3 7 1 3 6 8 6 7 1 5 6 5 ‐50 0 0 50 0 1, 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 3, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐55 . 5 9 % ‐41 . 7 0 % ‐3. 7 9 % 4. 2 3 % ‐90.91% ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐80 . 0 0 % ‐60 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 6 5 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G2 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Ba y s h o r e  Ma i n t e n a n c e  Bu i l d i n g Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    02 0 2 4 3 6 1        09 6 0 7 0 0 3            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 1 , 3 6 9 2 4 20 1 2 2 , 9 0 2 11 1 . 9 8 % 24 20 1 3 2 , 6 2 8 ‐9. 4 4 % 24 20 1 4 2 , 0 9 6 ‐20 . 2 4 % 26 20 1 5 3 , 2 3 4 54 . 2 9 % 24 20 1 6 2 , 7 3 7 ‐15 . 3 7 % 24 Ba y s h o r e  Ma i n t e n a n c e  Bu i l d i n g  showed  an   up w a r d  sl o p e .    28 0 0  1/ 2  N  ME R I D I A N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 1, 3 6 9 2 , 9 0 2 2 , 6 2 8 2 , 0 9 6 3 , 2 3 4 2 , 7 3 7 0 50 0 1, 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 3, 0 0 0 3, 5 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 11 1 . 9 8 % ‐9. 4 4 % ‐20 . 2 4 % 54 . 2 9 % ‐15.37% ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 1 0 8 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G3 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Ci t y  Ha l l Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 0 4 0 4 1        20 0 4 0 4 8            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 6 , 8 1 6 2 4 20 1 2 4 , 6 2 6 ‐32 . 1 3 % 24 20 1 3 3 , 0 9 9 ‐33 . 0 1 % 24 20 1 4 2 , 2 7 5 ‐26 . 5 9 % 24 20 1 5 2 , 5 4 1 11 . 6 9 % 24 20 1 6 3 , 0 6 9 20 . 7 8 % 24 Ci t y  Ha l l  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  ye a r l y   co n s u m p t i o n .  Ho w e v e r ,  it  is  be e n  noted  an   up w a r d  tr e n d  in  th e  la s t  tw o  ye a r s .    17 0 0  CO N V E N T I O N  CE N T E R  DR          17 0 2  CONVENTION  CENTER  DR       No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 6, 8 1 6 4 , 6 2 6 3 , 0 9 9 2 , 2 7 5 2 , 5 4 1 3 , 0 6 9 0 1, 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 3, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 5, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 7, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐32 . 1 3 % ‐33 . 0 1 % ‐26 . 5 9 % 11 . 6 9 % 20.78% ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 5 2 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G4 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Co l o n y  Th e a t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    97 0 4 0 5 9        20 1 0 1 1 0 1        60 8 1 3 8 8 6        60 8 1 3 8 9 2      Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 8 , 1 4 2 2 4 20 1 2 8 , 3 4 3 2. 4 7 % 24 20 1 3 9 , 5 8 3 14 . 8 6 % 42 20 1 4 9 , 5 9 5 0. 1 3 % 48 20 1 5 1 0 , 1 3 9 5. 6 7 % 48 20 1 6 1 1 , 1 1 4 9. 6 2 % 48 Co l o n y  Th e a t e r  sh o w e d  an  up w a r d  slope.    10 4 0  LI N C O L N  RD          16 2 2  LE N O X  AV E          No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 8, 1 4 2 8 , 3 4 3 9 , 5 8 3 9 , 5 9 5 1 0 , 1 3 9 1 1 , 1 1 4 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 2. 4 7 % 14 . 8 6 % 0. 1 3 % 5. 6 7 % 9.62% 0. 0 0 % 5. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 15 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 1 9 8 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G5 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Co m f o r t  Fa c i l i t y Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 2 0 5 7 1        97 0 4 5 6 5            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 1 , 9 8 7 2 4 20 1 2 2 , 4 4 8 23 . 2 0 % 24 20 1 3 1 , 7 8 3 ‐27 . 1 7 % 24 20 1 4 4 2 2 ‐76 . 3 3 % 28 20 1 5 5 7 2 35 . 5 5 % 24 20 1 6 0 ‐10 0 . 0 0 % 24 Co m f o r t  Fa c i l i t y  sh o w e d  a  st e a d y  downward   sl o p e .    46 0 0  1/ 2  CO L L I N S  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 1, 9 8 7 2 , 4 4 8 1 , 7 8 3 4 2 2 5 7 2 0 ‐50 0 0 50 0 1, 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 3, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 23 . 2 0 % ‐27 . 1 7 % ‐76 . 3 3 % 35 . 5 5 % ‐100.00% ‐15 0 . 0 0 % ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 0 9 6 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G6 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Co n v e n t i o n  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    01 2 4 0 3 9 9        02 0 4 4 8 5 3        09 7 0 4 1 4 5        09 7 0 4 1 6 8     09704170     09904128    Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 7 2 , 5 1 6 7 2 20 1 2 6 2 , 1 0 4 ‐14 . 3 6 % 72 20 1 3 9 6 , 0 8 1 54 . 7 1 % 72 20 1 4 6 4 , 5 9 7 ‐32 . 7 7 % 72 20 1 5 6 3 , 0 2 6 ‐2. 4 3 % 72 20 1 6 1 3 , 8 2 9 ‐78 . 0 6 % 72 Co n v e n t i o n  Ce n t e r  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  slope.    19 0 0  1/ 2  CO N V E N T I O N  CE N T E R  DR          19 0 0  1/2  WASHINGTON  AVE      1901   1/ 2  CO N V E N T I O N  CE N T E R  DR          20 0 0  1/ 2  WASHINGTON  AVE    No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 72 , 5 1 6 6 2 , 1 0 4 9 6 , 0 8 1 6 4 , 5 9 7 6 3 , 0 2 6 1 3 , 8 2 9 0 20 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 60 , 0 0 0 80 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 12 0 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐14 . 3 6 % 54 . 7 1 % ‐32 . 7 7 % ‐2. 4 3 % ‐78.06% ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 9 4 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G7 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Cr e s p i  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    09 7 0 1 1 0 3              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 20 1 2 3 0 8 18 0 . 0 0 % 12 20 1 3 2 0 0 ‐35 . 0 6 % 12 20 1 4 2 4 8 24 . 0 0 % 12 20 1 5 3 6 9 48 . 7 9 % 12 20 1 6 3 0 6 ‐17 . 0 7 % 12 Cr e s p i  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  sh o w e d  an  upward   sl o p e .    78 2 1  1/ 2  HA W T H O R N E  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 11 0 3 0 8 2 0 0 2 4 8 3 6 9 3 0 6 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 40 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 18 0 . 0 0 % ‐35 . 0 6 % 24 . 0 0 % 48 . 7 9 % ‐17.07% ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 1 6 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G8 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Fa i r w a y  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 4 4 7 6 1        20 4 4 7 8 8            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 3 3 , 1 5 5 2 4 20 1 2 2 1 , 8 3 7 ‐34 . 1 4 % 24 20 1 3 3 3 , 6 5 8 54 . 1 3 % 24 20 1 4 2 8 , 2 8 2 ‐15 . 9 7 % 24 20 1 5 2 8 , 9 9 4 2. 5 2 % 24 20 1 6 3 3 , 7 5 6 16 . 4 2 % 24 Fa i r w a y  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  showed  a   mo d e r a t e  up w a r d  sl o p e .    20 0  FA I R W A Y  DR            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 33 , 1 5 5 2 1 , 8 3 7 3 3 , 6 5 8 2 8 , 2 8 2 2 8 , 9 9 4 3 3 , 7 5 6 0 5, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 25 , 0 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 35 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐34 . 1 4 % 54 . 1 3 % ‐15 . 9 7 % 2. 5 2 % 16.42% ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 1 7 2 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G9 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Fi r e  St a t i o n  #1 Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 4 3 2 4 0        97 0 4 1 9 1            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 0 , 2 3 3 2 4 20 1 2 1 6 , 0 2 9 ‐20 . 7 8 % 24 20 1 3 7 , 8 7 2 ‐50 . 8 9 % 24 20 1 4 2 , 2 0 4 ‐72 . 0 0 % 24 20 1 5 2 , 6 4 1 19 . 8 3 % 24 20 1 6 5 , 0 7 5 92 . 1 6 % 24 Fi r e  St a t i o n  #1  sh o w e d  a  do w n w a r d  slope.  Ho w e v e r ,  it  is  be e n  no t e d  an  up w a r d  trend  in   th e  la s t  tw o  ye a r s .    10 4 5  JE F F E R S O N  AV E          10 5 1  JE F F E R S O N  AVE       No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 20 , 2 3 3 1 6 , 0 2 9 7 , 8 7 2 2 , 2 0 4 2 , 6 4 1 5 , 0 7 5 0 5, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 25 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐20 . 7 8 % ‐50 . 8 9 % ‐72 . 0 0 % 19 . 8 3 % 92.16% ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 0 1 2 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G10 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Fi r e  St a t i o n  #2  & Fi r e  St a t i o n  Ma i n t e n a n c e  Fa c i l i t y Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 4 4 5 4 7        96 0 3 5 3 3        97 0 4 2 6 0          Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 7 4 0 3 6 20 1 2 9 3 8 26 . 7 6 % 36 20 1 3 9 2 1 ‐1. 8 1 % 36 20 1 4 7 6 1 ‐17 . 3 7 % 36 20 1 5 7 8 6 3. 2 9 % 36 20 1 6 7 8 4 ‐0. 2 5 % 36 Fi r e  St a t i o n  #2  & Fi r e  St a t i o n  Ma i n t e n a n c e   Fa c i l i t y  sh o w e d  a  mo d e r a t e  do w n w a r d  slope.    23 0 0  PI N E  TR E E  DR            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 74 0 9 3 8 9 2 1 7 6 1 7 8 6 7 8 4 0 10 0 20 0 30 0 40 0 50 0 60 0 70 0 80 0 90 0 1, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 26 . 7 6 % ‐1. 8 1 % ‐17 . 3 7 % 3. 2 9 % ‐0.25% ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 8 0 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G11 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Fi r e  St a t i o n  #3 Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    97 0 4 1 0 3              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 , 8 2 4 1 2 20 1 2 2 , 5 4 2 ‐9. 9 9 % 12 20 1 3 2 , 4 7 4 ‐2. 6 8 % 12 20 1 4 2 , 7 3 2 10 . 4 3 % 14 20 1 5 3 , 7 6 4 37 . 7 7 % 12 20 1 6 4 , 6 2 8 22 . 9 5 % 12 Fi r e  St a t i o n  #3  sh o w e d  an  up w a r d  slope.    53 0 3  1/ 2  CO L L I N S  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 2, 8 2 4 2 , 5 4 2 2 , 4 7 4 2 , 7 3 2 3 , 7 6 4 4 , 6 2 8 0 50 0 1, 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 3, 0 0 0 3, 5 0 0 4, 0 0 0 4, 5 0 0 5, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐9. 9 9 % ‐2. 6 8 % 10 . 4 3 % 37 . 7 7 % 22.95% ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 7 0 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G12 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Me c h a n i c a l  Ma i n t e n a n c e / S a n i t a t i o n Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    97 0 4 1 8 6        20 1 1 1 4 6 8            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 , 1 9 6 1 2 20 1 2 1 , 1 1 5 ‐49 . 2 3 % 12 20 1 3 1 , 5 0 1 34 . 6 2 % 22 20 1 4 1 , 9 6 1 30 . 6 5 % 24 20 1 5 2 , 4 5 3 25 . 0 9 % 24 20 1 6 2 , 5 6 0 4. 3 6 % 24 Me c h a n i c a l  Ma i n t e n a n c e / S a n i t a t i o n  showed   an  up w a r d  sl o p e .    14 0  MA C  AR T H U R  CS W Y            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 2, 1 9 6 1 , 1 1 5 1 , 5 0 1 1 , 9 6 1 2 , 4 5 3 2 , 5 6 0 0 50 0 1, 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 3, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐49 . 2 3 % 34 . 6 2 % 30 . 6 5 % 25 . 0 9 % 4.36% ‐60 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 2 1 0 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G13 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : No r t h  Sh o r e  Co m m u n i t y  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 1 0 4 6 2 8              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 2 8 1 4 9 20 1 3 6 5 5 ‐19 . 5 3 % 12 20 1 4 4 0 5 ‐38 . 1 7 % 12 20 1 5 3 , 5 6 6 78 0 . 4 9 % 13 20 1 6 1 2 , 8 6 3 26 0 . 7 1 % 12 No r t h  Sh o r e  Co m m u n i t y  Ce n t e r  showed  an   up w a r d  sl o p e .    72 3 1  CO L L I N S  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 81 4 6 5 5 4 0 5 3 , 5 6 6 1 2 , 8 6 3 ‐4, 0 0 0 ‐2, 0 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 14 , 0 0 0 Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐19 . 5 3 % ‐38 . 1 7 % 78 0 . 4 9 % 260.71% ‐20 0 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 40 0 . 0 0 % 60 0 . 0 0 % 80 0 . 0 0 % 10 0 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 9 3 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G14 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Of f i c e  Bu i l d i n g  (7 7 7 ) Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    09 7 0 0 8 8 3        09 7 0 3 6 5 5        20 0 9 4 6 1 2        20 1 0 4 7 1 6      Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 , 5 9 7 5 0 20 1 2 5 , 7 3 4 12 0 . 7 9 % 48 20 1 3 4 , 5 5 9 ‐20 . 4 9 % 48 20 1 4 5 , 3 4 6 17 . 2 6 % 48 20 1 5 5 , 8 3 7 9. 1 8 % 48 20 1 6 6 , 8 4 5 17 . 2 7 % 48 Of f i c e  Bu i l d i n g  (7 7 7 )  sh o w e d  an  upward  slope.    17 0 1  ME R I D I A N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 2, 5 9 7 5 , 7 3 4 4 , 5 5 9 5 , 3 4 6 5 , 8 3 7 6 , 8 4 5 0 1, 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 3, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 5, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 7, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 12 0 . 7 9 % ‐20 . 4 9 % 17 . 2 6 % 9. 1 8 % 17.27% ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 0 1 2 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G15 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Ol d  Ci t y  Ha l l Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 4 2 6 8 3        99 0 4 0 1 2        20 0 9 4 6 6 4          Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 , 8 2 1 3 6 20 1 2 4 , 8 4 4 71 . 7 1 % 36 20 1 3 3 , 7 2 4 ‐23 . 1 2 % 36 20 1 4 2 , 7 0 1 ‐27 . 4 7 % 36 20 1 5 2 , 9 8 3 10 . 4 4 % 36 20 1 6 3 , 7 2 3 24 . 8 1 % 36 Ol d  Ci t y  Ha l l  sh o w e d  a  mo d e r a t e  downward   sl o p e .  Ho w e v e r ,  it  is  be e n  no t e d  an  upward   tr e n d  in  th e  la s t  tw o  ye a r s .    11 3 0  WA S H I N G T O N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 2, 8 2 1 4 , 8 4 4 3 , 7 2 4 2 , 7 0 1 2 , 9 8 3 3 , 7 2 3 0 1, 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 3, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 5, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 71 . 7 1 % ‐23 . 1 2 % ‐27 . 4 7 % 10 . 4 4 % 24.81% ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 80 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 1 1 1 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G16 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Pa r k s  Di v i s i o n ,  Nu r s e r y Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    02 0 2 0 7 4 5        09 7 0 4 2 6 2            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 9 , 5 8 1 2 4 20 1 2 4 , 4 9 3 ‐53 . 1 1 % 24 20 1 3 1 1 , 6 8 5 16 0 . 0 7 % 24 20 1 4 1 5 , 1 4 4 29 . 6 0 % 24 20 1 5 1 4 , 1 2 5 ‐6. 7 3 % 24 20 1 6 1 4 , 9 1 8 5. 6 1 % 24 Pa r k s  Di v i s i o n ,  Nu r s e r y  sh o w e d  an  upward   sl o p e .    21 0 0  ME R I D I A N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 9, 5 8 1 4 , 4 9 3 1 1 , 6 8 5 1 5 , 1 4 4 1 4 , 1 2 5 1 4 , 9 1 8 0 2, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 12 , 0 0 0 14 , 0 0 0 16 , 0 0 0 18 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐53 . 1 1 % 16 0 . 0 7 % 29 . 6 0 % ‐6. 7 3 % 5.61% ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 0 3 9 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G17 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Po l i c e  At h l e t i c  Le a g u e Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    20 4 4 8 5 2        20 0 9 4 7 6 3        20 1 1 3 0 0 5        21 1 1 3 0 0 5      Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 1 9 , 4 4 6 4 8 20 1 2 1 3 , 7 1 2 ‐29 . 4 9 % 48 20 1 3 1 3 , 8 7 6 1. 2 0 % 28 20 1 4 1 5 , 4 2 8 11 . 1 8 % 24 20 1 5 1 8 , 3 3 6 18 . 8 5 % 33 20 1 6 1 0 , 9 8 7 ‐40 . 0 8 % 36 Po l i c e  At h l e t i c  Le a g u e  sh o w e d  a  moderate   do w n w a r d  sl o p e .    99 9  11 T H  ST            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 19 , 4 4 6 1 3 , 7 1 2 1 3 , 8 7 6 1 5 , 4 2 8 1 8 , 3 3 6 1 0 , 9 8 7 0 5, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 25 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐29 . 4 9 % 1. 2 0 % 11 . 1 8 % 18 . 8 5 % ‐40.08% ‐50 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐30 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % ‐10 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 10 . 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 30 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 8 5 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G18 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Po l i c e  St a t i o n Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    11 9 7 4 5 5        91 0 4 0 2 9            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 3 2 , 8 7 4 2 4 20 1 2 2 0 , 7 0 8 ‐37 . 0 1 % 24 20 1 3 2 3 , 5 2 9 13 . 6 2 % 24 20 1 4 2 8 , 7 9 8 22 . 3 9 % 24 20 1 5 4 2 , 6 5 8 48 . 1 3 % 24 20 1 6 4 6 , 4 2 5 8. 8 3 % 24 Po l i c e  St a t i o n  sh o w e d  an  up w a r d  slope.    11 0 0  WA S H I N G T O N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 32 , 8 7 4 2 0 , 7 0 8 2 3 , 5 2 9 2 8 , 7 9 8 4 2 , 6 5 8 4 6 , 4 2 5 0 5, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 25 , 0 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 35 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 45 , 0 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐37 . 0 1 % 13 . 6 2 % 22 . 3 9 % 48 . 1 3 % 8.83% ‐60 . 0 0 % ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 0 3 0 ) T r e n d : Do w n w a r d Exhibit:G19 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Sa i l p o r t / P o l i c e  Su b s t a t i o n Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    09 6 0 3 2 1 3              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 3 6 6 1 2 20 1 2 2 , 9 1 2 69 5 . 6 3 % 12 20 1 3 1 , 4 2 1 ‐51 . 2 0 % 12 20 1 4 1 , 4 1 8 ‐0. 2 1 % 12 20 1 5 7 3 5 ‐48 . 1 7 % 12 20 1 6 1 , 0 6 5 44 . 9 0 % 12 Sa i l p o r t / P o l i c e  Su b s t a t i o n  sh o w e d  an   do w n w a r d  sl o p e .    68 4 0  IN D I A N  CR E E K  DR            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 36 6 2 , 9 1 2 1 , 4 2 1 1 , 4 1 8 7 3 5 1 , 0 6 5 0 50 0 1, 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 2, 0 0 0 2, 5 0 0 3, 0 0 0 3, 5 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 69 5 . 6 3 % ‐51 . 2 0 % ‐0. 2 1 % ‐48 . 1 7 % 44.90% ‐20 0 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 40 0 . 0 0 % 60 0 . 0 0 % 80 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : (0 . 0 0 5 ) T r e n d : St e a d y Exhibit:G20 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : So u t h  Sh o r e  Co m m u n i t y  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    09 7 0 4 1 8 1              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 7 , 6 9 1 1 2 20 1 2 4 , 5 8 7 ‐40 . 3 6 % 12 20 1 3 5 , 6 7 1 23 . 6 3 % 12 20 1 4 3 , 6 1 4 ‐36 . 2 7 % 12 20 1 5 3 , 4 9 6 ‐3. 2 7 % 12 20 1 6 8 , 4 4 9 14 1 . 6 8 % 13 So u t h  Sh o r e  Co m m u n i t y  Ce n t e r  showed  a   st e a d y  co n s u m p t i o n  wi t h  sp i k e s  in  2011  and   20 1 6      83 3  6T H  ST            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 7, 6 9 1 4 , 5 8 7 5 , 6 7 1 3 , 6 1 4 3 , 4 9 6 8 , 4 4 9 0 1, 0 0 0 2, 0 0 0 3, 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 5, 0 0 0 6, 0 0 0 7, 0 0 0 8, 0 0 0 9, 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 ‐40 . 3 6 % 23 . 6 3 % ‐36 . 2 7 % ‐3. 2 7 % 141.68% ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 0 7 8 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G21 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : St i l l w a t e r  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    09 6 0 3 2 7 5              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 20 1 2 2 4 7 17 . 6 2 % 12 20 1 3 6 3 ‐74 . 4 9 % 12 20 1 4 1 1 3 79 . 3 7 % 12 20 1 5 3 6 3 22 1 . 2 4 % 12 20 1 6 3 2 8 ‐9. 6 4 % 12 St i l l w a t e r  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  showed  an   up w a r d  sl o p e .    85 0 0  1/ 2  HA W T H O R N E  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 21 0 2 4 7 6 3 1 1 3 3 6 3 3 2 8 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 40 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 17 . 6 2 % ‐74 . 4 9 % 79 . 3 7 % 22 1 . 2 4 % ‐9.64% ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 25 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 1 0 0 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G22 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Ta t u m  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    09 6 0 2 6 1 3              Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 7 1 1 3 20 1 2 2 3 3 22 8 . 1 7 % 12 20 1 3 1 9 3 ‐17 . 1 7 % 12 20 1 4 1 2 6 ‐34 . 7 2 % 12 20 1 5 2 1 4 69 . 8 4 % 12 20 1 6 3 1 9 49 . 0 7 % 12 Ta t u m  Pa r k  Re c r e a t i o n  Ce n t e r  showed  an   up w a r d  sl o p e .    80 2 5  1/ 2  BY R O N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 71 2 3 3 1 9 3 1 2 6 2 1 4 3 1 9 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 22 8 . 1 7 % ‐17 . 1 7 % ‐34 . 7 2 % 69 . 8 4 % 49.07% ‐10 0 . 0 0 % ‐50 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 50 . 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 15 0 . 0 0 % 20 0 . 0 0 % 25 0 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Sl o p e : 0. 1 3 8 T r e n d : Up w a r d Exhibit:G23 Me t e r  Ad d r e s s ( e s ) : Yo u t h  Ce n t e r  (S c o t t  Ra k o w ) Me t e r  Nu m b e r ( s ) :    00 0 2 3 4 3 0        20 1 0 6 4 1 1            Ca l e n d a r  Ye a r Wa t e r  To t a l  Co n s u m p t i o n   (x  10 0  Ga l l o n s ) Va r i a n c e  fr o m  Pr e v i o u s   Ye a r  in  % Co u n t  of  Bi l l s  pe r  Ye a r   (L i n e  It e m s ) Co n c l u s i o n 20 1 1 1 2 , 8 0 1 7 20 1 2 1 7 , 6 2 1 37 . 6 5 % 12 20 1 3 2 8 , 4 9 8 61 . 7 3 % 21 20 1 4 2 3 , 5 3 0 ‐17 . 4 3 % 24 20 1 5 3 8 , 4 3 1 63 . 3 3 % 24 20 1 6 4 2 , 1 5 8 9. 7 0 % 24 Yo u t h  Ce n t e r  (S c o t t  Ra k o w )  sh o w e d  an   up w a r d  sl o p e .    27 0 0  SH E R I D A N  AV E            No t e : Co n c l u s i o n s  on  mu l t i ‐me t e r  lo c a t i o n s  ar e  ba s e d  on  su m  of  al l   me t e r s .  Sl o p e s  wi t h i n  +0 . 0 1  an d  ‐ 0. 0 1  ra n g e  ar e  co n s i d e r e d  st e a d y .  Fo r  al l   ot h e r  sl o p e s ,  po s i t i v e  nu m b e r s  re p r e s e n t  up w a r d  tr e n d s  an d  ne g a t i v e   nu m b e r s  "(    )" r e p r e s e n t  do w n w a r d  tr e n d s . 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 12 , 8 0 1 1 7 , 6 2 1 2 8 , 4 9 8 2 3 , 5 3 0 3 8 , 4 3 1 4 2 , 1 5 8 0 5, 0 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 25 , 0 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 35 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 45 , 0 0 0 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 37 . 6 5 % 61 . 7 3 % ‐17 . 4 3 % 63 . 3 3 % 9.70% ‐40 . 0 0 % ‐20 . 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 20 . 0 0 % 40 . 0 0 % 60 . 0 0 % 80 . 0 0 % 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 Ye a r l y  Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Va r i a n c e  (% )  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6 Wa t e r  Co n s u m p t i o n  Da t a  Fr o m  20 1 1  to  20 1 6