2003-25362 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-25362
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING
ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR REAR EASEMENT
WATERLINE RELOCATION EFFORTS, AS AMENDMENT
NO. 3 TO THE SCOPE OF SERVICES OF THE
AGREEMENT, DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2001, WITH
REYNOLDS, SMITH AND HILLS, AlE CONSULTANT FOR
THE LA GORCE RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; AND FURTHER APPROPRIATING
AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $35,999, FROM SERIES 2000
WATER AND SEWER BOND FUNDS FOR SAID SERVICES,
AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"
(THE FEE DETAIL); EXHIBIT "B" (WATERLINE
RELOCATION POLICY); AND EXHIBIT "C" (THE GEOGRAPHIC
AREA OF SAID ADDITIONAL SERVICES).
WHEREAS, the City has issued 1999 General Obligation (GO) Bonds, Series 2000
Stormwater Revenue Bonds and Series 2000 Water and Sewer Bonds to fund capital
improvement projects to provide better service to the City's residents and visitors; and
WHEREAS, on September 5 2001, the Mayor and City Commission executed a
Professional Services Agreement with Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. (the Consultant),
pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No.1 0-00/01, for Planning Phase Services
for the La Gorce Right of Way Improvement Project; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend this Agreement for additional services
requested by the City, and for credit owed the City, for an adjustment in the number of
actual feet of waterline design needed, and the associated level of effort of the Consultant;
and
WHEREAS, 153 private homes in the La Gorce Neighborhood receive water service
from waterlines located in inaccessible, rear right of way easements or access alleys
behind the homes, which impede City staff from reading the meters and providing service
for the lines; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to abandon the water infrastructure located within the
rear easement, relocate water meters to the ROW, and install new water service lines
under private property from the relocated meter box to a connection at the abandoned
meter box in the rear of the property; and
WHEREAS, on September 3,2003, the Consultant and CIP Staff negotiated a fee
of $39,999 for the requested additional services, and a credit of $4,000, for the deletion of
design tasks for 2,265 linear feet of water mains. The total not to exceed amount for this
Amendment NO.3 is $35,999, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the Administration recommends additional design services and
accepting credit issued to the City, for the adjustment of watermain design tasks, as
Amendment No.3, to the Agreement dated September 5,2001, with Reynolds, Smith and
Hills, AlE Consultant for the La Gorce Right Of Way (Row) Infrastructure Improvement
Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission approve Additional Design Services for rear easement waterline relocation
efforts, as Amendment NO.3 to the Scope of Services of the Agreement, dated September
5, 2001, with Reynolds, Smith and Hills, AlE Consultant for the La Gorce Right Of Way
(ROW) Infrastructure Improvement Project and further appropriating an amount not to
exceed $35,999, from Series 2000 Water And Sewer Bond funds for said services, as
more particularly described in Exhibit "A" (the Fee Det il); Exhibit "B" (Waterline Relocation
Policy); and Exhibit "e" (the Geographic Area of S Id dditional Services).
ATTEST:
lW~o ~Q;t~
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
10-6- C/?
Date
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
m
Condensed Title:
A Resolution Approving Additional Design Services for rear easement waterline relocation efforts for
Reynolds, Smith And Hills, AlE Consultant for the La Gorce Right Of Way (ROW) Improvement Project;
and further a ro riatin an amount not to exceed $35,999, from Series 2000 Water & Sewer Bonds.
Issue:
Should the City Commission approve additional design services in the amount of $35,999 to implement
CIP's Rear Easement Waterline Relocation Program in the La Gorce Neighborhood Improvement Project?
Item Summarv/Recommendation:
153 private homes in the La Gorce Neighborhood receive water service from waterlines located in rear
ROW easements or access alleys behind the homes. This amendment provides additional services for
Reynolds, Smith, and Hills, to implement the necessary design, permitting and bid and award services to
facilitate the placement and reconnection of water meters to locations in sidewalks in front of homes from
the rear of homes where they are currently located. This situation obscures the water meters and
waterlines, impeding City staff from reading the meters and providing service for the lines. Removing the
encroachments, which include structures, to replace the deteriorated waterlines is cost prohibitive. It is
anticipated that the majority of work with the exception of meter reconnection will be implemented via a
trench less technology. The additional services provided by this Amendment NO.3 will be in tandem with
the CIP Office's Community Notification plan in the affected area, which is outlined in the CIP Waterline
Relocation Policy presented to the Neighborhoods Committee on July 28, 2003. A similar amendment was
approved by the Commission for the Normandy Isle Neighborhood at the September 10, 2003 meeting.
CIP anticipates that one more amendment of this type will be presented for the Nautilus neighborhood in
the near future. Upon approval by the City Commission of Amendment No.3, the design phase of this
relocation effort will commence.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Source of
Funds:
Approved
D
Finance Dept.
Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin :
Stacy Lotspeich, Senior Capital Project Planner
n-Offs:
D partment Director
ity Manager
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM f!., 1 D
DATE IO-/~~3
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.miamibeachfl.gov
To:
From:
Subject:
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Date: October 15, 2003
Mayor David Dermer and
Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez \,.v"'~
City Manager 0 U
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING ADDITIONAL DESIGN
SERVICES; FOR REAR EASEMENT WATERLINE RELOCATION
EFFORTS, AS AMENDMENT NO.3, TO THE SCOPE OF SERVICES OF
THE AGREEMENT, DATED SEPTEMBER 5,2001, WITH REYNOLDS,
SMITH AND HILLS, AlE CONSULTANT FOR THE LA GORCE RIGHT OF
WAY (ROW) INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND
FURTHER APPROPRIATING AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $35,999,
FROM SERIES 2000 WATER AND SEWER BOND FUNDS FOR SAID
SERVICES, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A,"
THE FEE DETAIL, EXHIBIT "B," WATERLINE RELOCATION POLICY AND
EXHIBIT "C," THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF SAID ADDITIONAL
SERVICES.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
ANALYSIS
153 private homes in the La Gorce Neighborhood receive water service from waterlines
located in rear ROW easements or access alleys behind the homes. This amendment
provides additional services for Reynolds, Smith, and Hills, to implement the necessary
design, permitting and bid and award services to facilitate the placement and reconnection
of water meters to locations in sidewalks in front of homes.
The additional services are required to complement the design efforts for the entire
neighborhood. Rear easements alleys in many residential neighborhoods have acquired
major hardscape and landscape encroachments from adjacent private property owners.
This situation obscures the water meters and waterlines, impeding City staff from reading
the meters and providing service for the lines. Removing the encroachments, which
include structures, to replace the deteriorated waterlines is cost prohibitive.
Therefore, it is necessary to abandon the water infrastructure located within the rear
easement, relocate water meters to the ROW, and install new water service lines under
private property from the relocated meter box to a connection at the abandoned meter box
in the rear of the property. It is anticipated that the majority of work with the exception of
meter reconnection will be implemented via a trenchless technology.
City Commission Memorandum
October 15, 2003
La Gorce ROW Project - Amendment No.3
Page 2 of 2
The additional services provided by this Amendment NO.3 will be in tandem with the CIP
Office's Community Notification plan in the affected area, which is outlined in the CIP
Waterline Relocation Policy, attached as Exhibit "B," which was presented to the
Neighborhoods Committee on July 28, 2003. Upon approval by the City Commission of
Amendment No.3, the design phase of this relocation effort will commence. The
Consultant provided a man-hour projection and fee estimate for the contemplated
Additional Services. On September 3, 2003, a negotiation was led on behalf of the City by
CIP Assistant Director Jorge Chartrand. The services and associated expenses were
developed using the ROW Program's accepted program cost model. The agreed upon
fees, attached as Exhibit "A," include a credit back to the City for an adjustment in the
number of actual feet of waterline design needed and the associated level of effort of the
Consultant. A map showing the Project boundary is attached as Exhibit "C",
The Administration recommends approving additional design services, for rear easement
waterline relocation efforts, as Amendment No.3, to the Scope Of Services of the
Agreement, dated September 5, 2001, with Reynolds, Smith And Hills, AlE Consultant for
The La Gorce Right Of Way (Row) Infrastructure Improvement Project; and further
appropriating an amount not to exceed $35,999, from Series 2000 Water And Sewer Bond
funds for said services, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A," the fee detail, Exhibit
"B," Waterline Relocation Policy and Exhibit "C," the geographic area of said additional
services.
H/RS/sel
003\ocI1503\consent\La Gorce Amend No 3\La Gorce Amend No 3 MEMO.doc
C"')
o
Z
-
C
Q)
E
'0
-ICC"')
.....Q)O
~Eo
<CW<(N
....O-.~
- U""
l:OWQ)"-
- W "--' L-
::Z:u..eQ)
>< ".0
WWu"O
I=s:t>
1-00
0::
Q)
e
o
(!)
CO
-I
.
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page 1 of 11
Water Service Relocations on Private Property
Proposed Standard Operatina Procedure (SOP\
. Step 1. Create the list of affected Properties ("List")
1. Each respective neighborhood ROW Project Consultant shall be responsible
for creating a listing of properties ("List") to be affected by the proposed
relocation of water service connections from existing rear easements to the
public ROW. To create the List, the Consultant will utilize its existing
conditions survey, as well conduct of a field verification of affected properties
by address. The City's Project Manager and / or Program Manager will
monitor the Consultant's work effort and provide assistance as deemed
necessary.
2. The Consultant, pursuant to its professional judgment, shall produce a plan
view drawing ("Drawing") of each affected property that clearly illustrates
property lines, the property address, existing easements, the public ROW
boundary, existing structures, fences, walls, trees, significant landscaping,
and the proposed routing of the relocated water service connection. The
attached Figure illustrates the typical format to be applied by each
Consultant during the performance of this work effort.
. Step 2. Proiect Information and Community Meetina Notices
.
1. The Consultant will submit the List and Drawings for each affected property
to the CIP Office. through the Program Manager. The Project Manager,
District Administrative Assistant and / or Program Manager, through the
Public Information - Additional Support Services Task, will verify the
correctness of the List provided by the Consultant by comparing the
information with available known records such as the Permit Plus System,
the Miami-Dade County Appraiser's Office, and any other records that may
be available via the Public Works Department and/or the City Clerk's Office.
The purpose of this exercise is to determine, to the extent possible, the
current property owner (Owner) and his/her address, if different from the
property address.
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page 1 of 11
~.
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 2
2. Once the property Owner is identified, the CIP Office will prepare and send
each affected Owner a package (Package) of information via registered mail.
As noted above, it is understood that the Owner may reside at a different
address than the affected property. In these cases, information packages will
only be forwarded to the Owner, not the occupant, if any, at the affected
property.
3. The Package will include an explanation of the Water Service Connection
Relocation Program, explaining the reasons for the water service relocation,
and providing additional information regarding existing conditions at the
affected residence, as demonstrated by the Consultant prepared Drawing
noted above. Each package will also contain an "Authorization Form" and a
self addressed stamped envelope. In addition, the package will contain a
flier announcing a Public Meeting intended to further review the project in
further detail and answer any questions Owners may have.
4. An effort shall be made to hold at least two community meetings for affected
Owners (Meeting), at least 15 calendar days apart, with the first meeting held
no more than 30 days after mailing of the information Package,
5. It is the CIP Office's intent that the Package includes sufficient information so
that Owners will provide their executed Authorization Forms at the conclusion
of the Meeting. "Declination Forms" will also be made available at the
Meeting.
4. The City's Project Manager, assisted by the District Administrative Assistant,
will create individual folders (File) for each affected property. This folder will
include photographic surveys (reference Step 3 below), the Consultant's
Drawing of the affected property, and the Authorization or Declination Form,
as applicable.
. Step 3. Photoaraphic Survey of the Existina Conditions
1. Each Consultant is tasked with providing the City with a photographic survey
of each affected property, as a part of the Drawing preparation task.
2. The photographic survey is intended to illustrate conditions shown on the
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment NO.3
October 15,2003
Page20f11
~"
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 3
Drawing, and must indicate the dates the pictures were taken. For reference
tracking purposes, the angle and/or location where each picture was taken
from should be indicated on the Drawing.
. Step 4. Public Meetina and Property Owner Authorization
1. As noted in Step 2, an advertised Meeting will be held with appropriate CIP
Office, Program Manager and Consultant staff in attendance. The File for
each affected property will be made available for review by the respective
Owner at this meeting.
2. Authorization and Declination Forms to perform work on private property, will
be available for Owner execution after the meeting. It will be clearly noted to
Owners that CIP office staff cannot accept alterations to either form. Hence,
Owners interested in altering either form will be directed to the City Attorney's
office. Follow up for these Owners will be in accordance with the process
detailed below, or other such direction as may be issued by the City Attomey,
or designee.
. Step 5. Follow-up to RemaininQ Addresses
I n the event that an affected property Owner does not attend the Meeting described
above (Step 4), the CIP office will further seek authorization from the Owner as
follows:
1. Door to door contact. The Project Manager will review the List and identify
all Owners believed to be currently residing on the premises of affected
properties. In these cases, the Project Manager, or designee, will attempt to
contact and seek approval from those Owners contacting them directly via a
site visit. The assigned personnel will clearly display City identification
badges in such a manner so that they can be quickly identified as City
employees and/or agents. I n this effort, all conduct shall exemplify generally
accepted standards for business courtesy, The following guidelines will
apply:
Scenario 1: The property owner lives in the premises and is present.
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page 3 of 11
tL
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 4
The City Representative(s) will introduce themselves, stating their names,
titles, City Department and the purpose of their visit. The description of the
purpose of the visit shall include a brief overview of the Project, including the
specific work involved in relocating their current water service connection
from the rear easement to the front of the property, and why this is beneficial
to all parties. An explanation of the "Authorization Form" shall be provided.
The property owner shall be advised that the City will provide all of this work
at no cost to them.
a) The Owner shall be required to furnish a positive photo identification
to confirm his/her identity. Positive photo identification may include
an official Florida State Identification Card, a Passport, a Driver's
License or other official document. Information regarding the
identification shall be filled in the space provided at the bottom of
the second page of the "Authorization Form" identified in the "For
Office Use Only" box.
b) Any documentation needed to clearly explain the scope of the
proposed work as opposed to the current condition should be
brought to this meeting. This may include photographs, sketches,
construction documents and other relevant documentation.
c) The following topics shall be discussed with the Owner: schedule for
completion, accommodation to provide access during construction,
procedures if there are any complaints and/or concerns, chain of
command (the Contractor will not receive direction from the Owner),
and an explanation of completion.
d) If the Owner agrees with the City to authorize the work on his/her
property, the Owner will be required to fill out the spaces provided in
the Authorization Form and sign accordingly. The City
representative(s) in attendance at the meeting may serve as
witnesses to the transaction and will fill and sign the appropriate
"witness" box. A duplicate copy of the "Authorization Form" must be
left with the Owner.
e) In the event the Owner disagrees and does not accept the City's
offer to do the work in his/her property, the City representative(s) in
attendance at the meeting will explain the responsibility that the
Owner is assuming, including the possibility that the property may
disconnected from public water service, if the Owner does not
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page4of11
~,
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 5
complete the work on their own in a timely manner. The Owner will
be requested to sign the "Declination Form" which includes a
release to the City resulting from the Owner's decision to decline the
City's offer to perform the work,
f) If the owner requests time to review the documents, and/or to
consider his/her response, then the City Representative(s) will
establish a response schedule of no more than seven (7) calendar
days. The City Representative should then attempt to schedule a
follow-up meeting to pick-up the executed Authorization Form.
g) At this point the City Representative will courteously close the
meeting, encouraging the Owner to call with any concerns or
comments regarding the meeting. The City Representative will then
report the outcome of the meeting to the District Supervisor,
outlining any concerns and/or problems. The District Supervisor
shall decide if any additional follow up is needed.
. h) The City Representative will then return at the agreed time and
date, no more than seven (7) calendar days later, to meet with the
Owner and receive the executed Authorization Form. If the CIP
Office employee cannot make the meeting, then he/she shall make
arrangements for another City Representative to attend. A duplicate
copy of the "Authorization Form" must be left with the Owner,
Scenario 2: The property owner lives on the premises but is absent
In the event the property Owner lives on the premises but is absent, the City
Representative will leave a door hanger with the Authorization and
Declination Forms, and a cover letter requesting that the Owner call the CIP
Office to schedule a personal meeting.
a) If the meeting is set, it should be conducted as established in
Scenario 1 above.
b) The owner, after reviewing the door hanger, may decide to request
a telephone interview with City staff instead. If a telephone interview
is conducted, and the homeowner decides to authorize the work,
Scenario 1d above will be followed. In this case, the Owner shall
choose his/her own witness, and the document shall be notarized
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15. 2003
Page 5 of 11
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 6
for certification of identity of the Owner. The document may be left
at the property address for City pick up, or it may be mailed to the
CIP Office in the pre-stamped envelope enclosed in the original
information Package.
c) In the event the decision of the Owner is to reject the City's offer to
perform the work, Scenario 1 e shall be followed. Again the Owner
shall choose his/her witness, and the document shall be notarized
for certification of identity of the Owner. The document may be left
at the property address for City pick up, or it may be mailed to the
CIP Office in the pre-stamped envelope enclosed in the original
information package.
2. Mailing Phase. If door to door contact is not possible, either because:
. The Owner resides in the property and has ignored the City's attempt
to contact him/her for seven (7) calendar days, or has refused to sign
either of the documents noted above, and a seven (7) calendar day
period has elapsed since the last contact between the City and the
Owner, or,
. The Owner resides outside of the premises.
The Project Manager will forward, via certified mail with return receipt
requested, the Authorization Form, the "Declination Form", a cover letter
explaining the issues at hand, sketches and any supporting documents.
Under this scenario:
a) The Project Manager will keep a record of the US Postal Services
receipt as a proof of the good faith effort made by the City to make
contact with the Owner. All documents filed and returned by mail
shall be required to be notarized.
b) If no further communication from the Owner is received within fifteen
(15) calendar days after receipt confirmation, the City may assume
that the Owner is declining the City's offer to perform work,
c) However, as a final good faith effort, the Project Manager will send a
second package, identical to the first, with the exception that the
"Declination Form" shall be provided and the cover letter shall be
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page 6 of 11
~,
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 7
modified to reflect this as the Second and Final Notice, This
package will further convey that the City is removing the scope of
the work for water service relocation on private property from the
construction project, and that the Owner will assume total liability for
the final condition after fifteen (15) calendar days lapse following
receipt of the said Second and Final Notice. Said documentation
shall be filed with the City Clerk.
d) After this second 15 calendar days (for a minimum total of 30
calendar days), any non-responsive Owner will be considered a
negative "Declination" response.
e) The City will then proceed accordingly, removing all non-responsive
properties from the proposed scope of the Contractor's work, In
addition, a credit for the deleted work shall be requested from the
Contractor.
. Step 7 Demolitionl Construction Phase
The following steps will be implemented on all construction projects:
1. It is the Contractor's responsibility to contact all known utility companies to
ensure that no conflicts occur between existing and proposed buried
improvements on private property. The Project Manager and / or Program
Manager will ensure that the Consultant assigns this responsibility in the
contract documents, In addition, a written reminder of this requirement will be
forwarded to the Contractor prior to commencement of the work.
2. Prior to the commencement of work, the Project Manager and / or Program
Manager will verify that a schedule for completion is submitted for each
affected property. Each property schedule shall be communicated by the
Contractor to each affected Owner / Resident in the form of a door hanger,
or similar notification, left at each affected property no more than 48 hours
prior to commencement of construction activities on the private property.
The City, Program Manager and Contractor will work together to minimize
inconvenience to Owners / Residents on the affected property premises,
3. The Contractor shall be the first line of communications with residents for
addressing Owners / Residents requests for special accommodations,
miscellaneous questions, and other such issues, The Contractor shall
provide affected residents with required contact information on the
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No, 3
October 15, 2003
Page 7 of 11
Waterline Relocation Polley Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 8
notification door hanger. The hanger will also note that for water quality
related issues, residents may contact the CIP Office directly.
4. To establish a baseline condition of the private property, the Contractor will
be required to develop a video diary of existing installations in accordance
with contract document requirements. The City, Program Manager and
Contractor will use this video to verify that "like and kind" conditions remain
after construction is completed, in case disputes with Owners/ Residents
arise.
. Step 8 Construction Observation
Although the Contractor retains full responsibility for implementing requisite means
and methods to construct facilities that comply with contract document
requirements, the City will be providing "full-time" resident observers to verify
progress of the work in compliance with the general intent of the documents. These
construction observers are tasked with noting issues of concern, bringing them
immediately to the attention of the Program Manager, who will advise the Project
Manager and District Supervisor to determine the course of action to be taken.
. Step 9 Finallnspectionl Final Completion
The Contractor will notify the Program Manager when each individual relocation of
private property water service connection is completed. Completion shall mean that
the line had been relocated, the existing meter transferred to the new meter box on
at the front of the property, that all applicable bacteriological testing and clearances
have been received from jurisdictional agencies, that the final connections have
been made, the facilities to be abandoned removed have been finalized, and that
above ground improvements on private property have been brought back to like and
kind conditions, with no outstanding Owner/Resident issues of concern. Such
notifications shall be on a case-by-case basis, so requisite Program Manager and
City personnel can perform that final checkout of the installation. Note that all
dispute resolution with residents will be addressed as noted in Item Nos. 3 and 4 in
Step 7 above.
Under this work effort, the Contractor will maintain "record" copies of all installations
on private property, to be filed with the record drawings at the completion of the
Project.
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page80f11
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B
October 15, 2003
Page 9
. SteD 10 Warrantv
All project records will be kept with those of the specific neighborhood Right of Way
project. The work completed in private property shall be covered under the same
warranty as the other components of the Project.
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment No.3
October 15, 2003
Page 9 of 11
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B'
October 15, 2003
Page 10
HEDGE """'\
~
CONSULTANT TO FIELD
LOCATE EXISTING /YATER
METER. CONSULTANT TO
INCLUDE A NOTE REQUIRING
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD
VERIFY LOCATION.
3D':!:
~
~
"
~~
- "
"
x
~I
--~
x
DECK
CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE
x RECCOMENDED ROUTING FOR
PROPOSE WATER SERVICE,
ACTUAL ROUTE TO BE
VERIFIED/DETERMINED BY
CONTRACTOR IN THE FIELD.
x
HOUSE
-1
/-18':1:
I
I
18
~~
~
x
+t
o
I"')
x
u;
u.
'"
<i:
"
---..-------.--i
i
I
I
I
I
!
CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE
LOCATION OF PROPOSED
/YATER METER ON CONTRACT
DRAWINGS. EXAMPLE: STA.
73+83', LT ).
en
Cl..
I
J
.
..,
-- EDGE Of PAVElAENT
or
,j
.;;
o
.,.
lL
'"
~
-"
5
/
.,
---'--'---,--
\
\........ l. ROAOWA Y
0:
UNDEI/{;ROUND UTILITIES WITHIN THE
R-O-W ARE SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT
DRAWINGS. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
ON PRIVATE PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN
SHOWN. THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION
OF THESE UTILITIES IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
PROPOSED 8" W.lI.
;:;
~
~
I
.~
RIGHT -OF - WA Y IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WA TER SERVICE/METER RELOCA nON PLAN
Exhibit B
Waterline Relocation Policy
La Gorce ROW Project Amendment NO.3
EXHIBIT 'B'
SAMPLE-WATER SERVlCE/
METER RELOCATION PLAN
NORMANDY ISLES/SUO
NEIGHBORHOOD No. 4
,.
c
" APPROXIMATE SCALE :"=20'-0":1:
c..
U-!~
1 ~ CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
rl
"
".1
October 15, 2003
Page 10 of 11
"
Waterline Relocation Policy Exhibit B\
October 15, 2003
Page 11
-
"
'-,
CL
"
"-
w
CL
x
;,
u
'"
0'
^
"
-=-
"
/
CL
W
~
'"'
:>
/
.,.
.",
.,.
/
I
co
:>
~
I
"
o
,-
0-'
~ APPROXIMATE (MINIMUM) SCALE :," = 20' -0'
RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WA TER SER'v1CE/METER RELOCATION PLAN
~
i
(NORTH UP OR
TO THE RIGHT)
BASE-WATER SERVlCE/
METER RELOCATION PLAN
NEIGHBORHOOD NAME
NEIGHBORHOOD No. _
October 15, 2003
Page 11 of 11
\)
-
I
-------
"."
",
., ,,:,~,..,.....'
.. .
,.
"
I
I
3/
-~
11\
~ \ ,
j \.;~-----
--------,
ti'.~'"
".
'.
~ \i :J
\
\\~'
,.~\S I
~,,, ......'\ )
r-" I
l' \
",.!I~) \
,i" I
, . I
l : I
1':,..~,tI~.: J
J I
,I: ! I
...il:..,."",: i \
I
I I
I !
1\ ,
I
j
J
~
'J
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
1 {
ti
i~
2::-
~I
iJ
i
--
~
I
.I
,)
.I
.I
.I
.I
./
'"
....1
...
..-
",'"
--
r
I
,
l
I
r
J
I
J
I
I
I
,
\
\
\
,
\
...
,
...
\
\
\
\
l
I
I
I
r
j
,
,
J
I
,/
./
.I
..I'"
r
"
I
f
J
I
J
\
,
":-" .;
-....~...l .:.
",:..,,'
..."
.........
. ,
..
.......
.'t ,- ,;
\~q
"; } ~t
;1.. ,;)
l'.j"
'1."'''''1;
f' ;
EXHIBIT C
THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF SAID ADDITIONAL SERVICES
La Gorce ROW Project Amandment No 3.
October 15, 2003
.(
III
I
nn
rJJ
}jel
13 j
~j
'8 rll I I
II! I J
I J
.... LJ
CJ)
w
u
~
w..;
CJ) 0
....z
<(-
Z c
Q~C')
I--co
uoco
l-oQl"!,
_<(EIt)
lD <(....
:i:Qt>'-
X<(QlQl
w CJ) '0' .g
LL '- t>
0a..0
<(~
wO
a:: a::
<(
u ~
- 0
iE"
~j
"
o
w
"
W
J:
I-
1iIJ,'.".'''''''.....'l'
'.;.5.......~. .~"....
........,.,'fX,.;.,'.,_1.f,,::~