Loading...
Resolution 2020-31387R E S O L U T IO N NO . 2020-31387 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS WITH RESPECT TO PHASE I OF THE RFP SELECTION PROCESS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2020-180-ND, FOR DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES FOR THE 72N STREET COMMUNITY COMPLEX (THE RFP), AND APPROVING THE SHORTLIST OF THE THREE TOP-RANKED PROPOSERS, KAUFMAN LYNN CONSTRUCTION, INC, AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; AND PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. AND THE HASKELL COMPANY AS THE TWO (2) TIED SECOND RANKED PROPOSERS, TO BE FURTHER CONSIDERED IN PHASE II OF THE RFP EVALUATION PROCESS WHEREAS, on June 24, 2020, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of RFP 2020-180-ND for design/b uild services for the 72° Street Comm unity Complex (the RFP); the RFP was issued on June 26, 2020, with an opening date of August 10, 2020; and WHEREAS, the RFP provides for a two-step, phased evaluation process; and WHEREAS, the Phase I selection process, which is subject of this Resolution, relates to the qualifications, experience, and availability of the proposers and key members of the design- build team, including the lead designer and lead construction firm; and WHEREAS, only those proposers short-listed during Phase I will be authorized to proceed to Phase II of the RFP selection process, in which price and detailed technical proposals, based on the approved Design Criteria Package (the"DCP "), will be considered; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals in response to the RFP from the following seven (7) firms: • ANF Group, Inc.; • Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC; • Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc.; • KVC Constructors, Inc.; • NV2A Group, LLC; • PCL Construction Services, Inc.; and • The Haskell Company; and WHEREAS, the proposal from ANF Group, Inc. was deemed non-responsive for failure to meet the minimum requirements of the RFP, and was not considered further; and WHEREAS, on August 3, 2020, via L TC # 276-2020, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee (the" Evaluation Committee"), which convened on August 26, 2020 to consider the responsive proposals submitted under Phase I; and WHEREAS, the Phase I rankings of the Evaluation Committee are more fully set forth in the Commission Memorandum accompanying this Resolution; and W H E R EA S, after reviewing all the qualifications of each firm and having considered the Evaluation Committee's comments and rankings, the City Manager has recommended that, for Phase I of the selection process, the Mayor and the City Commission shortlist the three (3) top ranked firms: Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc, as the top ranked firm; and PCL Construction Services, Inc. and The Haskell Company as the two (2) tied second ranked firms. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pertaining to the ranking of proposals with respect to Phase I of the RFP selection process pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) NO. 2020-180-ND, for Design/Build Services for 72° Street Community Complex, and approve the shortlist of the three (3) top-ranked proposers: Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc, as the top ranked proposer; and PCL Construction Services, Inc. and The Haskell Company as the two (2) tied second ranked proposers, to be further considered in Phase II of the RFP evaluation process. PASSED AND ADOPTED this DAN GELBER, MAYOR ATTEST: 2Ä A.A FAEL E. GI NAO, CITY CLERK F:\PURC\Solicitations\2020\2020-161-ND _RFQ_Engineering_Services_for _ Waterway _Dredging\ 1 0- Commission Award Documents\RFQ-2020-161-ND - Resolution DRAFT.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM & LAN GUAGE & FOR EX ECUTION Resol utions -ç7 H MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manag er DATE: September 16, 2020 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF PROPOSALS WITH RESPECT TO PHASE I OF THE RFP SELECTION PROCESS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO. 2020-180-ND , FOR DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES FOR THE 72ND STREET COMMUNITY COMPLEX (THE RFP), AND APPROVING THE SHORTLIST OF THE THREE TOP-RANKED PROPOSERS, KAUFMAN LYNN CONSTRUCTION, INC, AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; AND PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. AND THE HASKELL COMPANY AS THE TW O (2) TIED SECOND RANKED PROPOSERS, TO BE FURTHER CONSIDERED IN PHASE II OF THE RFP EVALUATION PROCESS. -··-·-·· ------. --- RECOM MEND ATI ON The Administra tion recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida approve the resolution accepting the City Manager's recommendation for Pha se I of the evaluation process pertaining to the bids received, pursuant to RFP 2020-180-ND , for design/b uild services for 72nd street community complex, approving the short-list for bidders to participate in Phase 11 of the solicitation process. BACKGROUN D/HISTORY On Novemb er 6, 2018, Miami Beach residents approved a ballot meas ure, which auth orized the issuance of a general obligation bond (G.O. Bond) for the design, perm itting, manufacture installation, and construction of the 72nd Stre et Community Complex. A total of $55 million of general obligation bon ds wer e issued to fund the project, including but not limited to the design, perm itting, and construction. The Project includes a multi-level mixed-use parking garag e requiring the program components of a 500 space parkin g structure, 50-meter competition pool with support am enities, 25-m eter multi-purpose pool, 7,500 SF Miami-Dade County library, 5,000 SF commercial/retail, 7, 500 SF fitn ess center, 5,000 SF community center, 60,000 SF of active green space, and a jogging path. ANALYSIS On Jun e 24, 2020, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of Reque st for Page 313 of 1855 P ro posals (RF P ) 20 2 0 -18 0 -ND for D e sig n/B u ild S e rvi ce s fo r 72 nd S tr ee t C o m m u nity C o m p le x. O n June 26 , 2020 , the R F P wa s issued . A vo luntary pre -p ro p o sa l co nf e ren ce to pro vi d e inform atio n to pro po se rs subm itting a re spo nse wa s he ld o n Ju ly 7 , 2 0 2 0. In accord ance with Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes, the RFP provides for a two-step, phased evaluation process. The Phase I selection process, which is the reason for this item, relates to the qualifications, experience and availability of the proposers and key members of the design-build team, including the lead designer and lead constructíon firm. Only those Proposers short-listed during Phase I are authorized to proceed to Phase 11 of the RFP selection process, in which price and detailed technical proposals based on the approved Design Criteria Package (the "DCP") will be considered. Phase I responses were due and received on August 10, 2020. The City received a total of seven (7) proposals from the following firms: • ANF Group, I ne. • Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC • Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc. • KVC Constructors, Inc. • NV2A Group, LLC • PCL Construction Services, Inc. • The Haskell Company The proposal from ANF Group, I ne. was deemed non-responsive for failure to meet the minimum requirements of the RFP and was not further evaluated. On August 3, 2020, the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via L TC # 276-2020. The Evaluation Committee convened on August 26, 2020, to consider proposals received under Phase I. The Committee was comprised of Cynthia Casanova, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Department; Saul Frances, Director, Parking Department; David Gomez, Division Director, The Office of Capital Improvement Projects; Carolina Jones, Member, Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee; Carmen Sanchez, Deputy Planning Director, Planning Department; Daniel Veitia, Resident, North Beach; and Elizabeth Wheaton, Director, Environment and Sustainability Department. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relatíve to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFP. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A. A summary of each top-ranked firm follows: Kaufm an Lynn Con struction , Inc., Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc. (Kaufman Lynn), founded in 1989, is a local construction company that has built high-quality buildings for more than 30 years, with a diverse portfolio of projects to reflect this expertise. Its management approach is focused on fulfilling the objectives Page 314 of 1855 of their clients by embracing the collabora tive nature of the pro cess. Kaufm an Lyn n has gro wn into an industry leader by blending best in class cost saving s wi th stringent quality contro l processes. It is consistently recognized by peers for quality , safety , business practices, and community servi ce, and rank among the larg est contra ctors in the nation. Kaufman Lyn n in association wi th Zys covich Architects and Recre ational Design & Const ruction bring a high-q uality design sensitive to the issues of the location and the community , with specialized exp erience in recreational aquatics design and the quality of constru ction to meet the high exp ectat ions of Miami Beach. Combined, the team has wo rked on over 350 parki ng garag es, and more than 400 pools, including elevated, competition, and Myrth a pools in various design and constru ction functions. The team members have collabora ted on various projects inc luding the FAU M ixed Use Parki ng G arag e, M irad or Mixed Use Parki ng G arag e, Bluesten Park , and many oth ers . Its significant parki ng gara ge and aquatic exp erience is supplem ented by its exp erience building community spaces fo r m unicipal and other public clients . PCL Construction Services, Inc, PCL Construction Services, Inc. (PCL) specializes in multi-faceted projects including mixed- use, parking structures, aquatic facilities, libraries and community/recreation centers in coastal communities. Its Florida staff of over 200 provide full service preconstruction, estimating, purchasing, human resources, and marketing services in-house. PCL is ranked #1 contractor in Florida by Engineering News-Record (ENR). Finally, its capability to manage a large and complex design-build project is reflected in the firm's experience on more than 870 previous design-build projects. PCL along with BEA Architects and Brooks + Scarpa have assembled a team of highly qualified professionals to execute the 72nd Street Community Complex. This strategic team brings the City of Miami Beach the combined depth and breadth of PCL, the nation's 9th largest contractor with two of South Florida's most prominent architects, with 40 years of trusted local experience and superior standing in the South Florida market. Its selected subconsultants round out this team with their extensive relevant experience, local knowledge, and commitment to the success of this high-profile project. The Haskell Company The Haskell Company (Haskell), is a global pioneer in design-build construction with over 55 years of experience. It has been working and committed to the Miami area for over 20 years, completing such projects as the Adrienne Arsht Center for Performing Arts, three Miami Dade College parking garages and most recently, the Norwegian Cruise Line Terminal also known as the "Peart of Miami". With over $1B in annual revenues and over 2,500 design-build projects completed to date, Haskell is appropriately experienced, staffed and financed to support large and complex design-build projects that are fast-tracked and programmed with multiple disciplines. Partnered with Haskell is Arquitectonica, who brings a very experienced team of professionals that have creativity and community in mind, as well as Kimley-Horn, McNamara Salvia, Weston & Sampson, SEQUIL, SLS and Weller Pools. The team, combined with noteworthy consultants with vast local experience, was formed for each firm's relevant field experience and organizational excellence in order to bring the City the best design-build solution. This team, Page 315 of 1855 wh ic h c o n ta in s a c o n s id e ra b le d e g re e o f e xp e ri e n c e , im a g in a tio n a n d c a p a b ili ty, in te n d s to co m b in e the c ri te ri a no te d in the d e s ig n c rite ri a p a c kag e , wh ile d e liv e ri n g o n ti m e a nd wi th in b u d g e t. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Not applicable at this time. CONCL USI ON After reviewing the qualifications of each firm and having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings and commentary, I recommend that the Mayor and the City Commission approve short-listing the three (3) top ranked firms: Kaufman Lynn Construction, I ne., as the first top ranked firm, and PCL Construction Services, Inc. and The Haskell Company as the tied second ranked firms. These firms demonstrated the highest degree of qualifications. The evaluation committee scores indicate a significant drop-off in the scores awarded to the top three firms when compared to the remaining firms. The short-listed firms 'INill be further considered in Phase 11 of the evaluation process. Phase 11 will consider price and detailed technical proposals for the project. Some of the highlights of the firms' qualifications, as articulated by the Evaluation Committee, include: Kaufman Lynn Con struction, Inc, • The firm put together a cohesive team with urban design and rooftop pool experience. • The firm discussed sustainability as it relates to rainwater, harvesting, bioswales, and cisterns. • The references and projects included in the proposal were the most relevant to the 72nd Street Community Complex. • The firm addressed security control as it relates to the synergy between the pool and the fitness center. PCL Construction Services, Inc, • The aquatic consultant has over 50 years of experience and more than 4,000 projects across 6 continents. • The firm has a good understanding of the site and the City's mission. • The firm has a strong understanding of how to incorporate resilience and sustainability into the overall design from the beginning and throughout the course of the project. • The firm highlighted its relevant experience that directly relates to the 72nd Street Community Complex and its specialized elements. The Haskell Company • The firm took into consideration resiliency beyond water management and discussed energy use as well as how the building can be designed to utilize the natural features. • The firm partnered with Arquitectonica, as the lead design consultant, who has designed a number of buildings on 72nd Street and is familiar with the site and neighborhood. • Haskell is a large, capable, and exceptionally qualified firm that has completed over 2,500 design/build projects. • The firm's priority is the user experience. Therefore, based on the experience and qualifications mentioned above, I recommend the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals with respect to Phase I of the RFP selection process pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) 2020-180-ND for Design/Build Page 316 of 1855 S e rv ic e s fo r 72 n d S tre e t C o m m u n ity C o m p le x , and ap p ro vi ng the s h o rt lis t o f th e th re e to p - ra n ke d p ro p o se rs K a uf m a n Lyn n C o n s tru c tio n , In c , as the to p ra n k e d p ro p o s e r, an d P C L C o n stru c tio n S e rv ic e s , I ne . a nd T h e H a s k e ll C o m p a ny as the tie d se c o n d ra n k e d p ro p o s e rs , to b e furth e r c o n s id e re d in P h a se 11 o f the ev a lu at io n pro c e s s . Applicable Area North Beach ls this a "Residents Right to Know" item, pursuant to City Code Section 2-142 Yes Does this item utilize G.O. Bond Funds? Yes Legislative Tracking Capital Improvement Projects/Procurement ATTACHMENTS; Description Attachment A Resolution Page 317 of 1855 uO uO co e .... o 0O .--- ("") D O» ro a.