The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution 2020-31455 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-31455 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, FOLLOWING A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING, AS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 82-93(B), FINDING THAT THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION 82-94 OF THE CITY CODE HAS BEEN SATISFIED, AND APPROVING A REVOCABLE PERMIT REQUEST BY 544 LAKEVIEW COURT IRREVOCABLE TRUST (THE "APPLICANT") FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 544 LAKEVIEW COURT, MIAMI BEACH (THE "PROPERTY") TO ALLOW FOR SEAWALL REPAIR AND REINFORCEMENT WITH SUCH SEAWALL APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) FEET WIDE AND APPROXIMATELY 209 FEET IN LENGTH, AND CURRENTLY ENCROACHING FIVE (5) FEET NINE (9) INCHES (AT ITS MAXIMUM DIMENSION) INTO CITY SUBMERGED LANDS; AND WITH THE PROPOSED REPAIR OF THE SEAWALL FURTHER ENCROACHING INTO CITY SUBMERGED LANDS TO A MAXIMUM DIMENSION OF NINE (9) FEET TWO (2) INCHES, FOR A TOTAL OF 1,599 SQUARE FEET; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE REVOCABLE PERMIT. WHEREAS, 544 Lakeview Court Irrevocable Trust (the Applicant) is requesting the approval of a revocable permit for the residence located at 544 Lakeview Court ("the Property"), to allow for a seawall repair and reinforcement; and WHEREAS, the existing seawall is approximately three (3) feet wide and approximately 209 feet in length; and WHEREAS, the existing seawall currently encroaches five (5) feet nine (9) inches (at its maximum dimension) into City submerged lands; and WHEREAS, the proposed repair of the existing seawall will further encroach on to City submerged lands to a maximum dimension of nine (9) feet two (2) inches, for a total of 1,599 square feet; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawall will be constructed to a height of 5.7 feet NAVD; and WHEREAS, on October 17, 2018, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2018- 4220 which allows for the construction of new seawalls to encroach on City submerged lands and provides for a cost efficient manner for such construction; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has demonstrated that the alternative to the proposed repair and reinforce, which contemplates the issuance of a Revocable Permit, will cost an excess of four times the amount of the repair/reinforcement contemplated and herein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 82-93(a) of the City Code, notices for the required public hearing were mailed to owners of land lying within 375 feet of the existing permit area, at least 15 days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 82-94 of the City Code, the City Commission shall review the Revocable Permit request, and determine whether the request shall be granted or denied, following the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has analyzed the criteria contained in Code Section 82-94; a summary of the Public Works Department's review and recommendation to grant the Revocable Permit request is set forth in the Commission Memorandum accompanying this Resolution, which Memorandum is incorporated by reference herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission, following a duly noticed public hearing, as required pursuant to City Code Section 82-93(b), finding that the criteria set forth in Section 82-94 of the City Code has been satisfied, and approving a Revocable Permit request by 544 Lakeview Court Irrevocable Trust (the "Applicant") for the residential property located at 544 Lakeview Court, Miami Beach (the "Property")to allow for seawall repair and reinforcement with such seawall approximately three (3) feet wide and approximately 209 feet in length, and currently encroaching five (5)feet nine(9) inches (at its maximum dimension) into City submerged lands; and with the proposed repair of the seawall further encroaching into City submerged lands to a maximum dimension of nine(9)feet two(2)inches, for a total of 1,599 square feet; further authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Revocable Permit. PASSED and ADOPTED this /If day of O��ll bet , 2020. \ 1``r DAN GELBER, MAYOR '•.IUCORP' ORATED.'• ATTEST: '' ti). ts cti2css'„,;Zi RAF L E. RANADO, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION (13L06"' (b-� Z City Attorney Date Resolutions -R7 A MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: October 14, 2020 9:05 a.m. Public Hearing SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, FOLLOWING A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING,AS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 82-93(B), FINDING THAT THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION 82-94 OF THE CITY CODE HAS BEEN SATISFIED, AND APPROVING A REVOCABLE PERMIT REQUEST BY 544 LAKEVIEW COURT IRREVOCABLE TRUST (THE "APPLICANT") FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 544 LAKEVIEW COURT, MIAMI BEACH (THE "PROPERTY") TO ALLOW FOR SEAWALL REPAIR AND REINFORCEMENT WITH SUCH SEAWALL APPROXIMATELY THREE (3) FEET WIDE AND APPROXIMATELY 209 FEET IN LENGTH, AND CURRENTLY ENCROACHING FIVE (5) FEET NINE (9) INCHES (AT ITS MAXIMUM DIMENSION) INTO CITY SUBMERGED LANDS; AND WITH THE PROPOSED REPAIR OF THE SEAWALL FURTHER ENCROACHING INTO CITY SUBMERGED LANDS TO A MAXIMUM DIMENSION OF NINE (9) FEET TWO (2) INCHES, FOR A TOTAL OF 1,599 SQUARE FEET; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE REVOCABLE PERMIT. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends approving the Resolution. BACKGROUND/HISTORY 544 Lakeview Court Irrevocable Trust (the Applicant) is requesting the approval of a revocable permit for the residence located at 544 Lakeview Court("the Property'), to allow for the seawall repair/reinforcement behind the Property. The existing seawall is approximately three (3) feet wide and approximately 209 feet in length. The seawall currently encroaches 5 feet 9 inches onto City owned submerged lands at its maximum dimension. The proposed repair of the existing seawall which will expand the encroachment to a maximum dimension of nine (9)feet two(2)inches;for a total area of 1,599 square feet. Resolution No. 2016-29454 was adopted by the City Commission on June 8, 2016, and amended the City's Stormwater Management Master Plan to incorporate modifications to the standards for construction, including a minimum required seawall height. Section 9.2.5 ("Seawall Heights") was modified as follows: "All new seawalls on private construction and all Page 714 of 1576 seawalls constructed on public projects shall have a minimum elevation of 5.7 feet, NAVD, however, on existing private seawalls that are being replaced/repaired not associated with new building construction, a minimum 4.0 feet NAVD elevation shall apply with the structural design to accommodate a seawall height extension to a minimum 5.7 NAVD." On October 17, 2018,the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2018-4220 on October 17, 2018, which allows for the construction of new seawalls to encroach on City submerged lands and provides for a cost-efficient manner for such construction. New seawalls that encroach no more than four(4.0)feet into the submerged lands do not require a Revocable Permit. At its September 16, 2020 meeting, Public Works staff explained the Applicant's need for the seawall repair, which entailed repairing and fortifying a seawall already encroaching into City land. During the public hearing, it was also stated by Public Works staff that this would be the first Revocable Permit request of its kind. Historically, the Public Works procedure for any seawall encroaching greater than four(4)feet into City submerged land,was to have it removed, and rebuild it on private property. In this case, the Applicant has proposed to not remove the seawall, as it would be environmentally damaging. Instead,the Applicant proposed to repair the seawall and rebuild it. This will of course, result into a further encroachment into the City submerged lands. The Revocable Permit request was deferred to the next Commission meeting (October 14th), so there could be more time to review the request. Subsequent to the Commission meeting, staff has met with the Applicant's representative and engineer. The engineer has provided an Environmental and Structural Impact Review. A cost analysis has also been provided that substantiates that the alternative of removing and reconstructing a new seawall would be in excess of four times the amount of the proposed repair.The repair has already received approval from the Florida DEP and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. ANALYSIS The Applicants need is substantial to minimize potential environmental and neighboring property impacts associated with the removal of the existing wall and construction of a new wall within the private property. Pursuant to Section 82-93(a)of the City Code, notices of the public hearing have been mailed to owners of land lying within 375 feet of the existing permit area at least 15 days prior to the , public hearing. Public Works has analyzed the criteria contained in Section 82-94. Additionally, pursuant to Section 82-94, of the City Code, the City Commission shall review the Revocable Permit request and determine whether the request shall be granted or denied based upon the following criteria: • That the Applicant's need is substantial. The City implemented new regulations for seawalls to address sea level rise, which required property owners to increase the minimum height of their existing seawalls from 3.2 ft. NAVD,to a minimum height of 4.0 ft. NAVD. The new regulations require that the Applicant demonstrate that the existing seawall can accommodate an additional load Page 715 of 1576 to increase the height of the seawall in the future up to 5.7 ft. NAVD. In order for the Applicant to comply with the City's new regulations, only two options are. available: (1) to remove the existing seawall and construct an entirely new seawall which can comply with the new height and load requirements; or(2) add additional support and reinforcement to the existing seawall to increase the height to the new minimum and demonstrate the ability to accommodate the load requirements of the additional height. When reviewing and analyzing these options, the Applicant identified significant risks if it were to remove and construct a new seawall: • Significant environmental impacts - Removal of the existing seawall, and excavation landward of the existing seawall back to the Property line, has the potential for environmental impact. The impact is caused by the significant turbid water condition that clouds and/or smothers seagrass communities and other marine resources of significance such as corals, sponges, and tunicates within the vicinity of the project footprint during demolition, removal, and reconstruction. This potential for loss of soil and sedimentation of the bay bottom/Surprise Lake is significant and would result in habitat loss. Further, since the seawall is currently at an elevation of 1.88 ft. NAVD, over-topping from high tides and waves is a common occurrence which is currently destabilizing the property shoreline, and creating erosion and sedimentation. • Potential impacts to neighboring properties - If the existing seawall were to be demolished, the demolition could potentially damage the neighboring seawall, and could de-stabilize the neighboring property and shoreline, creating additional environmental impact/risk from the potential for seawall failures and/or soil loss through gaps or leaks. The impact to neighboring properties can be mitigated through the use of return walls and shoring to prevent soil loss and sedimentation into the bay/Surprise Lake (but the risk of damage by removing the existing seawall is significant and should be avoided given the practical alternatives of reinforcement of the existing seawall rather than removal). • The Applicant holds title to the abutting property. The property is the Applicant for the Revocable Permit and holds title to the Property. • The proposed improvements comply with applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, neighborhood plans and laws. The proposed seawall complies with all applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, neighborhood plans and laws. • The grant of such permit application will have no adverse effect on governmental/utility easements and uses on the property. The encroachment does not impact or interfere with navigability, or the City's use of the submerged lands. Moreover,there are no easements in this location. • The grant of the Revocable Permit will enhance the neighborhood and/or community by such amenities as, for example, but without limiting the foreground, enhanced Page 716 of 1576 landscaping, improved drainage, improved lighting, improved security and/or public benefits proffered by the Applicant. The City has recognized significant impacts as a result of sea level rise, and modified the City's seawall requirements to address these concerns. If this improvement is not made, the shoreline will continue to be impacted by higher tide levels, and the damage resulting from wave and water over-topping on to the homeowner's and City-owned property. Without the requested improvements, the existing seawall will fail, resulting in significant water quality and environmental impacts. As such, these improvements enhance the community by stabilizing the shoreline, protecting water quality for the enjoyment of the general public in Surprise Lake, and by ensuring safe navigability. • That granting the Revocable Permit request will not confer on the Applicant any special privilege that is denied by this article to other owner of land, structures or buildings subject to similar conditions located in the same zoning district. This process is available to all property owners similarly situated who require reinforcement to their existing seawalls in order to comply with the City's new seawall requirements. • That granting the Revocable Permit will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this article, and that such Revocable Permit will not be injurious to surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. As identified in the responses to 1 and 3 above, this request is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the City's Revocable Permit provisions, and benefits neighboring properties, the neighborhood, and community at large, as previously recognized and identified by the City Commission. CONCLUSION In 2019, the City Commission recognized these substantial and significant risks if a property owner was required to remove its existing seawall and construct a new seawall, and provided all owners similarly situated to submit an application for a Revocable Permit to allow for minor encroachments into City owned property to allow for reinforcement of their existing seawalls (to comply with the City's new seawall requirements, and therefore eliminating environmental impacts and potential impacts to neighboring property owners). This will be the first of such applications. The proposed repair will further encroach to a maximum dimension of nine (9)feet two (2) inches for a total of 1,599 square feet (as measured from the property line the wetface of the proposed new seawall cap)along the curve of their property line into City owned property. Results from the 2019 Resident Survey related to the overall ratings for the City of Miami Beach show that 50% of residents rated City efforts to manage stormwater drainage and flooding as excellent/good. In order to continue maintaining excellent standards in this area, the Administration recommends approving the revocable permit. The Administration recommends approving the Resolution. Applicable Area Middle Beach Page 717 of 1576 Is this a"Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O. to Know" item,pursuant to Bond Funds? City Code Section 2-14? Yes No Legislative Tracking Public Works ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ A- LETTER OF INTENT ❑ B - PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ C-OPINION OF TITLE ❑ D - PLATS ❑ E-SignedSealedPlans o F-Sketch and legal ❑ Reso 2016-29454 o Ordinance 2018-4220 © Environmental &Structural Impact Report ❑ (18-11-29) DEP Permit Exemption with SPGP-544 Lakeview Waterfront Improvements ❑ Resolution Page 718 of 1576 A-LETTER OF INTENT ' 1 J ILC OCEAN CONSULTING, LLC•340 vtiitnrcn Avenue.Suite 7•Coral Gables.FL 33134 Tel:305-921-9344"Fax:305-677-3254 wcu.nccancunsultiugll.cntn Via Electronic Mail and Hand Delivery June 2, 2020 Otniel Rodriguez El. Right-of-Way Manager " Public Works Department City of Miami Beach • 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,FL 33139 Re: 544 Lakeview Court,Miami Beach,Florida 33140 Dear Mr.Rodriguez: This correspondence is transmitted to you on behalf of Robert A. Lazenby and Gwen W. Lazenby,as Trustees of 544 Lakeview Court Irrevocable Trust, under Agreement dated February 24, 2012 (the "Lazenby's or the "Homeowners") regarding their pending application for a revocable permit to reinforce their existing seawall (the "Application") on their property located at 544 Lakeview Court, Miami Beach, Florida, 33140(the"Property"). Please allow this correspondence to serve as the Letter of Intent for the Application outlining compliance with the requirements of Section 82-94, City of Miami Beach Code as follows: Sec. 82-94. -Criteria for granting/denying revocable permits. (a) Revocable permits shall be granted or denied based upon existence of the following criteria: • (I) That the applicant's need is substantial. Response: The City implemented new regulations for seawalls to address sea level rising, which required Homeowners to increase the minimum height of their existing seawalls from +4.76 ft NGVD (+3.2 ft NAVD) to a minimum height of+5.56 ft NGVD(+4.0 ft NAVD). In addition,the new regulations require that the applicant demonstrate that the existing seawall can accommodate an additional load to • • rrtrirrFlrnr{rr(td aiilrr(rt't!iIPlrl 1'c'r'ruitliltlf •C'vutitrli i'.rrgt!t1'C U1g (3(ti) 4.?i..j:;lY- lel:' (3(r`r h" .325/ Page 719 of 1576 Otniel Rodriguez F.I. June 2,2020 Page 2 increase the height of the seawall in the future up to +7.26 ft NGVD (+5.7 ft NAVD), if the City should require additional protection. In order for the Homeowners to comply with the City's new regulations,only two options are available: (1)to remove the existing seawall and construct an entirely new seawall which can comply with the new height and load requirements,or add additional support and reinforcement to the existing seawall to increase the height to the new minimum and demonstrate the ability to accommodate the load requirements of the additional height should the City require it in the future. When reviewing and analyzing these options, the Homeowners identified significant risks if they were to remove and construct a new seawall. These risks are identified below: • Significant environmental impacts: Removal of the existing seawall, and excavation landward of the existing seawall back to the property line, has the potential for environmental impacts. The impacts are caused by the significant turbid water condition that clouds and/or smothers seagrass communities and other marine resources of significance such as corals, sponges, and tunicates within the vicinity of the project footprint during demolition, removal, and reconstruction. This potential for loss of soil and sedimentation of the bay bottom/Surprise Lake is significant and would result in habitat loss. Improvements to the seawall are important and necessary; the seawall is currently at an elevation of+1.88 feet NAVD,and over-topping from high tides and waves is a common occurrence which is currently destabilizing the property shoreline,and creating erosion and sedimentation now. • Potential impacts to neighboring properties: If the existing seawall on the Homeowners' property were to be demolished, the demolition could potentially damage the neighboring seawall, and could de-stabilize the neighboring property and shoreline, creating additional environmental impacts/risk from the potential for seawall failures and/or soil loss through gaps or leaks.The impact to neighboring properties can be mitigated through the use of return walls and shoring to prevent soil loss and sedimentation in to the bay/Surprise Lake,but the risk of damage by removing the existing seawall is significant and should be avoided given the practical alternatives of reinforcement of the existing seawall rather than removal. In 2019,the City Commission recognized these substantial and significant risks if a homeowner were required to remove their existing seawall and construct a new seawall, and provided all homeowners similarly situated to submit an application for a revocable permit to allow for minor encroachments into City owned property to allow for reinforcement of their existing seawalls to comply with the Ent•n`•,ii,n ulu!,thtrtuj( iin-nl '!'crnutting ( ua.'(11L'.r:kinccr1r7„: Tel '305, ;),?1-93-1-1-J i j3fiij Page 720 of 1576 Otniel Rodriguez E.I. June 2,2020 Page 3 City's new seawall requirements, and therefore eliminating environmental impacts and potential impacts to neighboring property owners. The Lazenby's are requesting a minor encroachment which varies, but is a maximum of 7 feet 3 inches (as measured from the property line the wetface of the proposed new seawall cap) along the curve of their property line into City owned property. The seawall currently encroaches 5 feet 9 inches at its maximum dimension. An additional 18 inches is being requested. As identified above, this need is substantial to eliminate potential environmental and neighboring property impacts. (2) That the applicant holds title to the abutting property. Response: Please see attached Survey and Title Opinion. (3) That the proposed improvements comply with applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, neighborhood plans and laws. Response: Please see attached comments from the City acknowledging that all applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, neighborhood plans and laws have been complied with. (4) That the grant of such permit will have no adverse effect on governmental/utility easements and uses on the city properly. Response: The encroachment is de minimis and does not impact or interfere with navigability, or the City's use of the property. Moreover, there are no easements in this location. (5) That the grant of the revocable permit will enhance the neighborhood and/or community with such amenities as,for example, but without limiting the foregoing, enhanced landscaping, improved drainage, improved lighting, improved security, and/or public benefits proffered by the applicant. Response: The City recognized significant impacts as a result of sea level rising and modified the City's seawall requirements to address these concerns. If this improvement is not made,the shoreline will continue to be impacted by higher tide levels,and the damage resulting from wave and water over-topping on to the Homeowners and City-owned property. Without the requested ti}n ir,auuentat.lhi;;<rgen7L,ott f'cratitlrrt ('?avi,1t F_rrrht,,,;•ing rtttij cc)l-<fe./t bill"{fJ it t1---Pyr Page 721 of 1576 Otniel Rodriguez E.I. June 2,2020 Page 4 improvements, the existing seawall will fail resulting in significant water quality and environmental impacts. As such,these improvements enhance the community by stabilizing the shoreline, protecting water quality for the enjoyment of the general public in Surprise Lake, and by ensuring safe navigability. (6) That granting the revocable permit requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this article to other owner of land, structures or buildings subject to similar conditions located in the same zoning district. Response: This process is available to all homeowners similarly situated who require reinforcement to their existing seawall in order to comply with the City's new seawall requirements. (7) That granting the revocable permit rill be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this article, and that such revocable permit will not be injurious to surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Response: As identified in the responses to 1 and 3 above,this request is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this article, and benefits neighboring properties,the neighborhood and community at large as previously recognized and identified by the City Commission. Thank you for your continued attention to this matter. Should you require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ca7(6,7t Kirk Lofgren Enc. cc: Matthew Whitman Lazenby Amy E. Huber,Esq. •,Nrr! P.,,m:r urt •(auvte,I Iri 00,, 0'/.J..;!- 10; ?++5);` .i?s.r Page 722 of 1576 B-PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF MIAMI BEACH APPLICATION FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT FILE NO: DATE: 1. NAME OF APPLICANT: 544 Lakeview Court Irrevocable Trust 2. APPLICANTS ADDRESS: 544 Lakeview Court,Miami Beach,Florida 3. APPLICANT'S BUSINESS TELEPHONE 305-403-9200 RESIDENCE TELEPHONE: 4. ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT CITY PROPERTY: 5. ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S PROPERTY ABUTTING SUBJECT CITY PROPERTY: 504 Lakeview Court,Miami Beath,Florida Lots I and 2 of SURPRISE POINT,according to the plat thereof,as recorded in Plat Book 43,Page 77,of hte Public Records of Miami-Dade County,Florida 6. HAS A PUBLIC HEARING BEEN HELD PREVIOUSLY REGARDING THIS REQUEST? YES NO X IF SO,WHEN: FILE NO.OF PREVIOUS REQUEST: 7. BRIEFLY STATE REQUEST EXPLAINING THE REASON/NEED FOR THE REVOCABLE PERMIT: The application is necessary to repair and reinforce and existing seawall on the subject property to maintain the integrity of the shoreline to prevent soil erosion into the canal. F 1WORK\SALL`j I}EMfPLOYF.E FOLDERSICAREY OS BOURNLARevocable_Pennits\Revocable permit formlRevocablePerrnicForm oc Page 1 of-3 Page 723 of 1576 8. DOES THE REQUEST INVOLVE THE PLACEMENT OF OBJECTS OR STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES X NO IF SO, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE OBJECTS/STRUCTURES: Seawall repair and reinforcement, 9. NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ,SouthEast Marine Construction,Inc. ADDRESS: 1121 NW 51st Court,Fort Lauderdale,Florida 33309 BUSINESS TELEPHONE: 954-630-2300 SEE THE ATTACHED LIST FOR ITEMS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION(SECTION 82-92, ITEMS 1 THROUGH 9). NO WORK SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN THE SUBJECT CITY PROPERTY UNTIL A REVOCABLE PERMIT APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION IS OBTAINED. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS FOR ALL WORK ON THE SUBJECT CITY PROPERTY. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. ALL DATA SUBMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS APPLICATION BECOMES A PERMANENT PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY. F 1WORKISALLt(I)EMPLOYEE f0LDERSICAREY 050OURNERcvocabie PermltslRcvocable permit formlRevocablePermitForm doe Page 2 of 3 Page 724 of 1576 FILE NO. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS AT THE FOLLOWING STREET ADDRESS: --- --- -- ----, MIAMI BEACH, FL. INSTRUCTIONS; COMPLETE OWNER AFFIDAVIT OR CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT,AS APPLICABLE,ALSO,IF YOU ARE GIVING POWER OF ATTORNEY TO AN INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT YOU ON THIS REQUEST,COMPLETE THE LAST AFFIDAVIT. Mu OWNER AFFIDAVIT I, MA lt' LQ ,being first duly sworn,depose and say that I am the owner of the property described hern and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing: that the answers to the questions in this application and all sup temental data attached to and made a part of the application are ho = • =nd true to the best of my knowledge and belief. r _ ur!.. JESSICA LQREhZo 11 I - Sworn to and subsc ' to before me r• F'•: Notary Public State of F,ari j this 4' "'rday of �l / :',..,tio Commiulon:GG 3tt42y f• 1 3oreft through Matron.i L. Asir. Commission Expires: '10"14-A. _ Jr CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT I, ,being duly sworn,depose and say that we are the PresidentNice President,and retaryiAss t Secretary of the aforesaid corporation,and as such,have been authorized by the corporation to file this application for public hearing; that all answers to the questions in said application and all supplemental data attached to and made a part of this application are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief; that said corporation is the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing. PRESIDENTS SIGNATURE(CORP. SEAL) ATTEST: SECRETARY'S SIGNATURE Sworn to and subscribed to before me this day of , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC Commission Expires: � n ��tt� (t„rOWNER/POWER OF ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT ! I, a ►Cj .1N.. ,being duly sworn,depose and say that I am owner of the described real property a d that I am aware of the nature and affect of the request for this revocable permit, relative to my property,which is hereby ade by me or I am hereby authorized Amy E.Huber,Esq. F to be my legal representative before the City Commission. (11111M JESSICA LE ATURE Sworn Windnd subscrib fore me ( ?. —. Notary Pubfrc•State of FiermO1®ItapV this.. W day *O'2 &4 I cj' :ons+e�tt.on a e�eeit+wts 9dr�rcTi " iai �.�0 sr. I t roup f atm Assr. • Commission Expires: 4th,1e26.X3 F IWORKISALLX I)EMPLOYEE FOLDERSCAREY OS$OURNE1Rcvocable_Permits\Revocable permit fonnUtevoablePetmitForm.doc Page 3 of 3 Page 725 of 1576 FILE NO. PP/ L �k THFU JECT PROPS !BATT FO LO ITWF..W'WVERESS: `� MIAMI BEACH, FL. INSTRUCTIONS: COMPLETE OWNER AFFIDAVIT OR CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT,AS APPLICABLE,ALSO,IF YOU ARE GIVING POWER OF ATTORNEY TO AN INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT YOU ON THIS REQUEST,COMPLETE THE LAST AFFIDAVIT. ( ' ! OWNER AFFIDAVIT z-'- ,being first duly swum,depose and say that I am the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing: that the answers to the questions in this application and all supplemental data attache to and made a part of the application are honest and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. t f� ) 1 -•,rr AMY E.HUSEa I Sworn nd subscribed to be ore me p , Nary Public-State of Florida this �7�� day of • Commission f GG]114914/1r/h/1`' F' Pay comm.Expires ray 21,2021 r NOTA'Y •1-LIC Bonded through KitioneI Notary Assn. Commisss: 6i lI -3 H►1ffftf•••Hft,ff.ttF17•NtttM•ff•f► M ••t \f1.111••••••••••••••••lMN ffl*f* t * *Nftt /* RIINtf/ tf •ff• tM01,•••••••-•1111M t ••Hl••tf*M*• CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT I, ,being duly sworn,depose and say that we are the PresidenWlce President,and Secretary/Ass't. Secretary of the aforesaid corporation,and as such,have been authorized by the corporation to file this application for public hearing; that all answers to the questions in said application and all supplemental data attached to and made a part of this application are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief; that said corporation is the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing. PRESIDENT'S SIGNATURE(CORP.SEAL) ATTEST: SECRETARY'S SIGNATURE Sworn to and subscribed to before me this day of , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC Commission Expires: 1RtlfNffftttM•••I,tM►Hf1•f•1.I•ttlttlflni•HMM.H•ff•Mftt• t lwtil*Mfff•MfftO Mfftw•tilMM......f•tM•'I• OWNER/POWER OF ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT I. ,being duly sworn,depose and say that I am owner of the described real property and that I am aware of the nature and effect of the request for this revocable permit, relative to my property,which is hereby made by me or I am hereby authorized Amy E. HUber.Esq. to be my legal representative before the City Commission. OWNER'S SIGNATURE Sworn to and subscribed to before me this day of , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC Commission Expires: F'.WORK\SALL(!)EMPLOYEE FOLDERS CAREY OSDOURNE1Revocable P,tmits Revocable peanut rorm.RcvocablcPermiiForm.doc Page 3 of 3 Page 726 of 1576 FILE NO. ►�-� / k--e-4 'Q TH U JE PRO TY IS AT FO LOV JAN ADDRESS'5-- f `'2 - t L� , MIAMI BEACH, FL. INSTRUCTIONS: COMPLETE OWNER AFFIDAVIT OR CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT,AS APPLICABLE,ALSO,IF YOU ARE GIVING POWER OF ATTORNEY TO AN INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT YOU ON THIS REQUEST, COMPLETE THE LAST AFFIDAVIT. _,J OWNER AFFIDAVIT qt, �OB e'�-t '�'Ze�$ r ,being first duly sworn,depose and say that I am the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing: that the answers to the questions in this application and all supplemental data attached to and made a part of the application are honest and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. l i ` il.ei+aialado+owl"•"1"ahlam' e---\ A.�'- Npttry PubEk•Sttte of Florida � IGNATURg Sworn to and subsc d to fore e i:.•: ;.1 Comaufsio••cG 32a,4t /� thisGj L1 day `.1 (1,t my Comm.Expires May 28.20231 ' i/ boded through National Noten awl. I — litT'‘'Y •DlilLIC Commissl e- xpires:_ 426/21;e f..f......«.«.�,..yN«In..« ►«f«s«r.arr a..rs..th+«4.««.et...irMiffMM.++t**A* ....«Siff*A.+++...«.M«««fMK►.««..M CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT I, ,being duly sworn,depose and say that we are the PresidentNice President,and Secretary/Ass't. Secretary of the aforesaid corporation,and as such,have been authorized by the corporation to file this application for public hearing; that all answers to the questions in said application and all supplemental data attached to and made a part of this application are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief; that said corporation is the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing. PRESIDENT'S SIGNATURE(CORP.SEAL: ATTEST: SECRETARY'S SIGNATURE Sworn to and subscribed to before me this day of , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC Commission Expires: «.1.f1....f.►i.«..e.fv..«f««ff«....N►Ne..«t.+«.f.«««««M«etilPtI e..«.tf..fe►f..fflfM OWNER/POWER OF ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT I, ,being duly sworn,depose and say that I am owner of the described real property and that I am aware of the nature and effect of the request for this revocable permit, relative to ml property,which is hereby made by me or lam hereby authorized Amy E.Huber,Esq. tc be my legal representative before the City Commission. OWNER'S SIGNATURE Swam to and subscribed to before me this. day of . 19 NOTARY PUBLIC Commission Expires: r•urnnv,r r r f 4.,run,num':rnr nr:oalp A br'V FICIVnt to WC1o....,...61. P.+...:,.1 Q.•,•.w+hl.n..mit Innnlitew rnInhoP.r.nitFnrm rtn, Page 727 of 1576 D•OPINION OF TITLE OPINION OF TITLE To: City of Miami Beach With the understanding that this Opinion of Title is furnished to the City of Miami Beach, as inducement for issuance of a permit, covering the real property hereinafter described, it is hereby certified that I have examined that certain (a) Owner's Policy of Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company under Policy Number 5011412-0047958e having an effective date of April 2, 2012 @ 9:48:57 a.m. (the "Title Policy"), and (b)Title Search Report ("Title Update") issued by Attorneys' Title Fund Services, LLC, under File Number 12147003 covering the period from October 8, 1998 through October 8, 2019, at 11:00 p.m. ("Current Date"), all respecting the following described property ("Property"): Lots 1 and 2 of SURPRISE POINT, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 43, Page 77, of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. Based only upon the Title Policy and the Title Update, I am of the opinion that as of the Current Date, the fee simple title to the Property was vested in: Robert A. Lazenby and Gwen W. Lazenby, as Trustees of 544 Lakeview Court Irrevocable Trust, under Agreement dated February 24, 2012, subject to the following encumbrances, liens and other exceptions: A. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes for 2019 and taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. 4. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. Page 728 of 1576 Opinion of Title Page 2 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. Any adverse ownership claim by the State of Florida by right of sovereignty to any portion of the lands insured hereunder, including submerged, filled and artificially exposed lands, and lands accreted to such lands and riparian rights and/or littoral rights, if any. 7. Federal liens and judgment liens, if any, filed with the Florida Department of State pursuant to Sec. 713.901, et seq., F.S., and. Sec. 55.201, et seq., F.S., respectively, which designate the Florida Department of State as the place for filing federal liens and judgment liens against personal property. 8. Any lien provided by County Ordinance or by Chapter 159, Florida Statutes, in favor of any city, town, village or port authority, for unpaid service charges for services by any water systems, sewer systems or gas systems serving the land described herein; and any lien for waste fees in favor of any county or municipality. 9. Zoning and other restrictions imposed by governmental authority. 10, The rights, if any, of the public to use as a public beach or recreation area any part of the land lying or formerly lying between the body of water abutting the subject property and the natural line of vegetation, bluff, extreme high water line or other apparent boundary line separating the publicly used area from the upland private area, or such upland private area as it may have existed prior to the construction, if any, of any seawall or bulkhead hereon. 11. Any portion of the Property lying waterward of the ordinary high water mark of the Atlantic Ocean and/or the Erosion Control Line, recorded in Plat Book 105, at Page 62 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. 12. Those portions of the Property comprising artificially filled land in what was formerly navigable waters are subject to any and all rights of the United States 2 1:1iibldocsll2 f 47003%1d\I2g9906.dcx Page 729 of 1576 Opinion of Title Page 3 government arising by reason of the United States government's control over • navigable waters in the interest of navigation and commerce. 13. The rights of the State of Florida and the United States of America to regulate the use of the navigable waters. B. 'RECORDED MORTGAGES: Mortgage in the original principal amount of $4,114,540, in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), as nominee for SunTrust Mortgage, Inc, a Virginia corporation ("SunTrust"), pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated June 16, 2016, as recorded on July 8, 2016, in Official Record Book 30145, at Page 387, among the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. C. OTHER SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Therefore, it is my opinion that the following party(ies) must join in the proffered document in order to make it valid and binding on the Property: Name Interest Robert A. Lazenby, as Trustee of 544 Lakeview Trustee of Fee Simple Owner Court Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dated February 24, 2012 Gwen W. Lazenby, as Trustee of 544 Lakeview Trustee of Fee Simple Owner Court Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dated February 24, 2012 SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. Mortgage Holder 3 1.11 i b\d ocs\1214700311 t1112g9906.doc Page 730 of 1576 Opinion of Title Page 4 I, the undersigned, further certify that I am an attorney-at-law duly admitted to practice in the State of Florida and a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. Respectfully submitted this 2 6 day of November, 2019. KATZ, BARRON, SQUITERO, FRIEDBERG, ENGLISH & ALLEN P.A. By: Howard L 'Hedberg Florida Bar o. 347663 901 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 10th Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of November, 9 4 2019, by Howard L. Friedberg on behalf of KATZ, BARRON, SQUITERO, FRIEDBERG, ENGLISH & ALLEN P.A., who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. ir r� . Q My Commission Expires: Notary Public :,,cc L. Gr-a- Print Name p is MON/afir'. "�. swoon ,.b1 4 I‘Iib'docs 12147003 al'12g9906 doc Page 731 of 1576 Opinion of Title Page S Exhibit A 1. Restrictions, dedications, conditions, reservations, easements and other matters shown on the plat of SURPRISE POINT, as recorded in Plat Book 43, Page(s) 77, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). 2. Reservations in favor of the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida recorded in Deed Book 197, Page 464, as to 3/4 interest in all phosphate, mineral and metal rights; 1/2 interest in all petroleum rights. (Note: Right of entry released pursuant to F.S. 270.11). 3. Declaration of Restrictive Covenant recorded in Book 26795, Page 4264, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). 4. Riparian and/or littoral rights are not insured. 5. Changes in the boundary of the land resulting from erosion or accretion caused by the flow of Surprise Lake. 6. Matters shown on the survey prepared by Nova Surveyors Inc. dated December 28, 2011 under Survey No. 11-0001105-1, as follows: • a. 4.82' encroachment of concrete block wall and column onto a portion of Lot 3. b. Encroachment of 4' iron fence onto a portion of Lots 2 and 3. c. Encroachment of brick paver driveway onto a portion of Lakeview Court but only to the extent such pavers are not expressly permitted pursuant to Declaration of Restrictive Covenant recorded in Official Record Book 26795, Page 4264. d. Encroachment onto Surprise Lake of land ranging approximately 1' to 8' lying outside the southern boundary of the property along the length of such boundary, a 3' wide seawall contiguous to such land along the length thereof, and a wood dock contiguous to a portion of the seawall. 7. Certification of Trust dated, as recorded on July 8, 2016, in Official Record Book 30145, at Page 382. B. Declaration of Use for Guest Rouse Related to Impact Fees dated September 12, 2016, as recorded on September 13, 2016, in Official Record Book 30227, at Page 4150. 9. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated November 14, 2017, as recorded on December 5, 2017, in Official Record Book 30780, at Page 276. NOTE: All recording references above are to the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. 5 1:Uibldocsl12147003tiaAl2g9906.doe Page 732 of 1576 - lain b .+ :, .1.t� , - , .1.� �s limn \- 7itti . tr etirlirti: ! MED in .eng . Piiiiiiirv./. .L .4, , -. .L;=1- 1 _ _ ._..i._. - En .e.f._ 17V FLZA4 2 3 t S e T 8 o 10 , 2 s t S o r e o to tti 1. 14 iiiiii ." La Eill:1111111111 1::131i:111�aa-----. Tsw-sr----------irn ' z' Pt I . _ io --- 2 7 , 5 e r e IIUM 4 d 1 Er.:11finci.. ,,-.:::::dritt, nit ,„_,,,,,_;, . , • rally iiiiii �sommihs! " 4 lationello:123iraspit:.41 - • agalManal=NIOMMIMangli 411114, Aimpies.. ,fr . ..-74, "\-44111111S'ill 1111'filkiRA4kk* A* - II . 1' Roi .-A2d4, 10 Apair p p -"I% SUPRISE LAKE ! A ,L, 40.451p7 r N��cl HD 4 `tib 14n. --. .--. I" ' id barn =in - oilj -"Il 11* Wed • MINFiN33 1,,,_ , im ,. ___,_._ ... ;1--- 11111.2111 ii a t 111 et r a o mt ft / 811r :111118 � 1111211% � n wt � � t 3 2 1 a ma Ate ! o , %mu r gilt_________/_.:_____.÷... 141:2-., i. „ , a ma . atm . 3, 11:11 IIPIN Iat lar atm!r -' 'AA aBruitlakro=wp� r � s Al&' VMS a u r .arvil /kW d i LQIIPtill 114 1411171X i ' d�l -. .l ! inii `plk, d ■. !.•.L .;, SIVld_3 le Z a LAZENBY DOCK °'` �. �1 GENERAL NOTES MODIFICATION& 't. -. '`" _ .r •r:r, •t ' p, aid 1 ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM AYD)OF 1956 SEAWALL REPAIR L ./1. ,� ,f \`' '� 2 ALL DIMENSIONS ON PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION IN THE FIELD. i „�- K1 �. • '. `.. 4,.., 3 lT IS THE INTENT OF THESE PLANS 70 BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND AUTHORITIES PROJECT N+ i .T .T'1 .0.. HAVING JURISDICTION ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND APPLICABLE CODES SHALL BE AliariBaA,Flarida d�u�4- { ))li' \ //7, IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ENOMEEA BEFORE IYNOCEEDING WITH WORK.CONTRACTOR CLIENT: FfY - nr• •, AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LINES,ELEVATIONS,AND MEASUREMENTS IN 4 �1� 4 CONNECTION WITH THEIR Wows M0.MAi THEW LAZENBY 101{, 1 • �• 4 IT Is THs INTENT OF THESE PLANS AND THERFSIONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.TO COMPLY W1711LOCAL. S44 Lakeview C4 Miami BacltiR. _ '•:k..' µ \ \ .-; / STATE,AND FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS ISSUED FOR THIS PROJECT IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S 31140 •- t-= �' ` i 0.1. N RESPONSIBILITY TO FAMILIARIZE AND GOVERN PRMSELFgYALL PROVISIONS OF THESE PERMITS. I1 5. APPLICABLEBUB.DINO CODE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE,1017 EDITION(AND CURRENTADDENDUMS). ult. _ �• j+i �f Qp�� •, . a 6 AFIROVED CONTRACTOR O DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF IXISTING STRUCTURES AND VERIFY ALL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT. _•..�. 'i • o, •j SVN.I, '" L DIMENSIONS THE APPROVED CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL METHODS,MEANS,SEQUENCES AND OCEAN l.L� ' PROCEDURES OF WORK • / 7. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS. CONSULTING,LLC �T"�-�'` R CONTRACTOR 70 VERIFY LOCATION OF EIDS 1NG UTILITIES PRIORO COMMENCING WORK, 340 Metra Mime,5044 7 `�. 9 CONTRACTORTOPROPERLY FENCE ANOES SECURE AREA WITH BARRICADES. CarGMq Coral Florida 33154 10 ANY DEVIATION ANDOR SLIBSTITUTJON FROM THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TeL(305)$214344 TO THE WO E ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT'OF RK :1.. 'it,:' II. AU.NEW MATERIALS ANDDOR PATCHWORK SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MATCH EXISTING MATERIALS AND1OR Fax(305)677-3234 ADJOINING WORK WHERE PRACTICAL EXCEPT AS SPEL`IF(CALLY NOTED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR: \ N. `/ 12 LICENSED CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL POSSIBLE CARETO PROTECT ALL Exuma MATERIALS,SURFACES. AND NG ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION - 13 THE LICENSED NENSED COLNT ACTOR TO INSTALISHINGS FROM DAMAGE L AND REMOVE ALL SHORING AND BRACING AS RE 11 PROPER EXECUTION OE THE WORK. REQUIRED FOR THE 14 ALL NEW WORK ANGOR MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF EACH ADMINISTRATIVE BoDCE A'' P- I! THE CCONIRACTOR WILHAVING L EMPLOY AND MAINTAIN ADEQU'FcTION IN EACH PERTAINING e ccac a. .. .,.........,...,�... .._ • I TO PROTECT BISCAYNE BAY FROM SEDIMENT AND CONS T�RESOURCES DIVISION _ i;1 ani 1 'I r. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL F... DOCK LL 60 PSC PROJECT ENGINEER: BOLTSIIANE �- DYNAMIC ENGINEERING CCC SOLUTIONS,INC. / 1. ALL BOLTS SHALL DE3I6 STAINLESS STEEL,UNLESS OTHER 331 S.Cyptea�Rad,Sidle 303 A - PoNpeac Beach,FL 33060 _ C ev �0/�t)99.4e• Far(934)SIJ 1740 LOCATION MAP AND LF_,GAL DESCRIPTION I PRIMARY NIJMBERIPRESSIIRETR61TFD MARINE GRADE SOUTHERN PI R WOOD FRAMING MF.MBER55} NE SETTER SEAL!SIGNATURE;DATE _ I ALL DIMENSIONS ON PLANS ARE SURIECTO VERIFICATION 1NTHE FIELD. CONCRETE A 4�i"+;°µ:,�n1�,� > 6 1:. • al +` PROJECT SITE LOCATION: I CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 31$(LATEST ED.)AND SHALL BE REGULAR WEIGHT SULFATE RESISTANT. an ` • �`-"� 4,,, )� 111 344 Lakeview Court WITH A DESIGN STRENGTH OF KM PS1 AT 29 DAYS W;A MAX WATER.CEMENTICUS MATERIALS RATIO,BY t 4"4'41 - i ,,.1.., WEIGHT,NORMAL WEIGHT AGGREGATECONCRETEOF010. ':�, • o l t 'F13 4T Miami Beach,Florida.33 140 �� N •�,•C,:� 2 OWNER SHALL EMPLOY AND PAY FOR TESTING SERVICES FROM AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY • •-••y', a!•�{C•.•,. N- _ sl. , o ma` , FOR CONCRETE SAMPLING AND TESTING IN ACCORDANCE W-ASTM ti,- • i I f F - +.,-.. , / - LATETUDE: 25 DEC49'24.OT•N 3 LICENSEDCOTRACTORISRFSFONSIBLEFORTHEADEQUACYOPFORMSANDSHORINGANDFORSAFE •/jam /,'�' I ,��///LLL S .. i-- ;:0,......!:i!,•.i LONGITUDE: SO DEC 73!123"W PRACTICE IN THEIR USE AND REMOVAL 7 `� 0 ,r�:,•'� -, • to 1 CONCRETE ` QAPPROVED DRAWINGS �1V Q. l 1T: .= 9 REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE IN CONFIT VERSION OF ASTM A613 GRADE 60 ail- ry .....1,...........____.___.! - F-••:v _ �' � •ir. SPECIFICATIONS CONFORMANCE PLACEDPSI LATEST �' I �, •� L k YU•,..„0.• •7^O St FOLIO N0,:02-3223-012•(1010 PRA�ALLEREINFORCEMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE W.AC13ISAND ACI MANUAL OF '7e• Ler , AP to, 11., : 6 SPLICES N REINFORCING BARS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 46 BAR DIAMETE ISAND REINFORCING SHALL BE -, • ' ELE 1V " CONTINUOUS AROUND ALL CORNERS AND CHANGES IN DIRECTION CONTINUITY SHALL BE PROVIDED AT I •• � I'} WPM O•cTG , i' r4 V'. PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CORNERS OR CHANGES IN DIRE4TKM BY BENDING THE LONGITUDINAL STEEL AROUND THE LOANER 41 BAR PERMIT DRAWINGS ,. a,'� srn (i i SURPRISE POINT PB 43-77 DIAMETERS Imola N humJanuary Dale : �ti_��I "• , :`Io I'I y LOTS I A 2 PILEORNINGNOTES IQ Ienugty 31,2019 f} .•ki:'• +^�► '1 a""I'�I I LOT SIZE 39496 SQUARE FEET I PILE DRIVING OPERATIONS SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR INCLUDING TEST PILES ' •al S 'E .. XML',, j1 k l,.f„F111i,Ell lh, SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE THE APPROXIMATE LENGTH REQUIRED Io MEET DESIGN CAPACITY. t 4 q Ad"JY,I 'I(hl �lq coC 23024.43301320120034 2 PILES SHALL BEDal VEN USING AN APPROVED CUSHION BLOCK CONSISTING OF MATERIAL SO ARRANGED SO •--..'. � L.I ` ,r',i.,.........•:\�.,.x �r 'T p �I.' AS TO PROVIDE THETRANSMI5SION OF THE HAMMER ENERGY. : 4 it�'' II* IIII,�a, , 3 PILFSSFLV.LBEDwVD/TOREt]111REDCAPACITY AMIN I2 INTO BERM 1• 1 ~��' ,�r7 .°jLN ( .r i'NIIu I 'I hp A PILFSSHALL BE DRIVEN WITH AbROP HAMMER O0.GRAVITY HAMMER PROVIDED THE HAMMER SHALL PROJECT:154755 4 f ��rw- hal P t1�;I I e�r Opt,' WEIGH NO LESS THAN 31(10 POUNDS.AND THE FALL OF THE HAMMER SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 FT ff l-� • ,.^`, .'i a- — �~ •I I 4 ••,' 1. PILES SHALL BE DRIVEN WITH A VARIATION OF NOT MORE THAN-PER FOOT FROM VERTICAL.OR FROM -- "`..'L'.'; °.,• I THE BATTER LINE INDICATED,WITH AMAX VARIATION OFTHE HEADOFTHE PILE FROM THE POSITION PROTECT LOCATION SHOWN ON THE MANS OF NOT MORE THAN 36 NOTES 6 WHERE PILING MUST PENETRATE STRATA OFFERING HIGH RESISTANCE OSTRUCTURAL THE SCALE;AS SHOWN ENGINEER OF RECORD OR SPECIAL INSPECIOR MAY REQUIRE THAT PILES BE SET IN PRE-DRILLED OR SHEET NO PLINCHEb HOLES THE PILES SHALL REACH THEIR FINAL.PENETRATION BY DRIVING S-1 • \ ----- LAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& \ SEAWALL REPAIR PROJECT / \ Miemi Berk Hard] � LLIFI4T: \ 13 I S C A Y NE 13A Y MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY f \ 544 Lakeview Ct.Miami Geach.FL 33140 \ t ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT 1 \ OCEAN 1r n30R'-b" \ \\ 21VITUSRA �2� CON5ULTING,LIC \ 340 Minorca Avenue.Suite 7 \ (f'j{�j Cwat Gables.F)orida 33134 \ ��I I j I Td:(SUS)921.93W`�f�JFax:(SOf)677.3251 \ FEB 2 5 2 SM CONTRACTOR: \EXISTING WOOD MOORING \ \ ouRc� PILE 70 HE REMOVED. \ \ C3EPA FCONO L114nrO}y ' \ \\ r.NO MIC 'E.^:DURC ES , y - PILES,AND ACCESSORIES EXISTING WOOD DOCK, \ \ \b 4 \ PROJECT ENGINEER: 'nr \ Q �_ TO BE REMOVED. \ DYNAMIC ENGINEERING 110 UNAUTHORIZEDDOUHIE \ ��• \�C 35115 Cypress Reach. Rodsu 303 OLUTIONS,INC Pompano J-`�j/ �: ]ET SKI FVP TD BE 6dr,, Tel:(964)545.1740 FL 33060 v, -'d:.\\‘‘ �1\0••• • .,.-9. ..-----------1 n, ,err,� c REMOVED. .r l� Fu(954)545.1721 1 Cy 1 I r n -•I - '.r • �'� \4 SEAL/SIGT4ATURL/DATE• 7 1 �.. r-\° .d•, 1-I 111 33 �Oii . V :0:e...ilia . ��ii■+�� en (� \O aaiiiaaaa \ 9 in m_ _ _111111*, �/, %i/ri��II/I�/l.�G �Gl/r ///..a/y 'w////l//. \3-1 '.F'� uoEXISTDJG 30K LB / ./��/.. J'` _—_ //, ii vi//' r \ 'rj,•' oFa•••a r elti CAPACITY 4-POST ,V,.:/;X/� ppERSY LINE � j / BOAT LIFT TO REMAIN. ///`�`�► Y PR z, � - G. eal V r,60'-8" /-.)49:1. IN -------.. \ \ : •'' :-/--•-- \ . 1(4/.1:OF ' - 9 •-" EXISTING CONCRETE '; !« So •/jSEAWALL AND CAP \ • Oki 'r+k cA•$0$ I /' TO REMAIN. %tel//9i/\ \ • • "'LL ..;tL,'-, . r--5S ® '�94-8 �%//\ PXT �1�bRAWINGS �4-4.,4� ry Issue 0 Issue Date EXISTING MONOLITHIC�\ 12 CONCRETE SEAWALL TO REMAIN. (()EXISTING CONCRE'T'E .\ 1 Q January 31,2019 aster EXISTING CONDITIONS KING PILES TO REMAIN. \ it Y' $-4• -544 Lake vie a C'6,+/,!- RER-MAMMAL RESNRCES 'ION Miami Beach,FL PRELIMS YAP O�y�a 1 \ NAME �i �. I PROJECT 13-4753 DATE �f �er/ii \ 1 _ EXISTING CONDITIONS .._---'---- --' 1 SHEET NO it@ o e S—2 N t.ta n+m-i tri / — LAZENBY-DOA --1 \ 13 I S C: A V N I: II A V —\ I3ATION IREPAIR 67 PROJECT O1 Mian Back F1eed q f - CLIEN�- Ci /1208'-6"' MR MATTHEW LAZENBY I SN Lievlev Ct.Misty BntA.F1- J 33140 xJ i `\ i 1 \ 1 ENVIRONMEN ALCONSULTAM: OCEAN (6)IZ'DIA.WOOD FENDER PILES i'` \ Se CONSULTING,LLC WITH(2)I!•CLEATS PER PILE. • 340 Misecca Aram. te 7 \ 535, Ccea1 Gates,Florid.33131 r t NEW 460.1 SF L-SHAPED _� I DOCK WITH IPE 2 \ Fn:(30S)677.3254 CONCRETE BEAM EDGE \ Tel•(305)921-934425""' \ CONTRACTOR: HARDWOOD DECKING. 1 I NEW 7-STEPS • * \ I(2)NEW POWER qd ALUMINUM \irfJ \\ f PEDESTALS. d? EXISTING 30K LB ` S �'/ 1 CAPACITY 0.P0ST l l6 NEW REINFORCED \J� 1 PROJECT ENGINEER. BOAT LEFT TO REMAIN. ��' .'J' \ _ CONCRETE SEAWALL CAP. �� / \�. DYNAMIC ENGINEERING 3p•3° f ��'\ _�- \k/ \�a SOLUTIONS,INC. la, � \cT, 3sF 5! (22)NEW CONCRETE BATTER y\ o Both.FL ism 303 --]\ I 1 OI p" �,, PILES SPACED IQ O.C.MAX , \�• T61-(9S1)545-1740 1 _ �`� Fes:1931)515.1721 t 'r �' s SECTION OFSeA4iALLCAP \� I t CONSIDERED VIEWING \%.1 SEAL lSIGNATURE/DATE I • 1 w\ 4 CAPACITYNEW TAO LDOUBLE PLATFORM.TOTAL 33.2 SF 1� \11l)i 11 „j NEW 7-STEPS ✓ w .V1101 tri►' )ET-SKI LIFT. �149'.7r. ` 1./. � .>#N MS 'r' ••. �i f' ALUMINUM / , ' ��rw�t�e.it Alga�'�Ti ---"."";;` --...--=......,- ��ti _ • \\ •�V N, 733 t 1 LADDER. '�/ ./ !'r `,ti1 ,_ \ �lr A „ I�11 EXISTING CONCRETEIll % :•. 1 a)o!, s I 43 0 / EXISTING MONOLITH)C SEA WALL TO REMAIN /1 `41% \ .S • F1> sititb. I. `� b CONCRETE SEAWALL Q =ju `` >d Q9Uk. I L 1 N TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONCRETE- \ Piapp,CA>!6129 / O i'6 g r6'. ify.6 KING PILES TO REMAIN. `\ PERMIT DRAWINGS • c .- l': '- IRW?) t. Line N fame Doe 1 © October 3t,2019 PROPOSED CONDITION \ Miami Reach.FL D)UI:: 11 Nl+iUltlttroT . T. 2Y PROJECT:137!! \ DEP.'. 445,? OF L5 \ � PROPOSED CONDITION . .... .- -- ---'-- - -'--. --._ - .___... .. • .-.______--._.. .___ _ .—t SCALE:ASSNOWN _.. +1 /I"L,C c T ' SCALEHEET N,/O`'\y'_ r6pziwinsimmi (`/•�`�N\/ meacx.rrtyt S 3 ! — - LAZENBY DOCK x I \ MODIFICATION& yBISCAYNEBAY SEAWALL REPAIR !! PROJECT Oi \ Miami Beach Fluids S \ CLIENT: v, (1208'-6 MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY Q 544 Lakeview Ce,Mimi 9a+ch.FL C \ 77140 W' (3)NEW DOLPHIN \ PILE CLUSTERS TO BE INSTALLED. \ OCEAENVIRONMEN CONSULTANT \ CONSULTING,LLC I (6)12"DIA.WOOD FENDER PILES \ WITH(2)18"CLEATS PER PILE 53.�' -----.")\ 740 Minoru Avmme,Su to 7 \ Coral Gail M Florida 13134 Tel:(3051 921-9344 NEW 460.3 SF L-SHAPED— \ \ Fax:(301)677-3254 CONCRETE BEAM EDGE \ CONTRACTOR DOCK WITH IPE 491 HARDWOOD DECKING. 25�`1 \\ ta I NEW 7-STEPS "- -c, 1(2)NEW POWER �• ALUMINUM \ PEDESTALS. q41 LARDER. �6 \FJCISTJNG 30K LBr �� .1 ��."", 4 \.r� \CAPACITY 4-POSTE `(y 1�� '•v--,.iiay;.i�;i-•.;;,•n� NEW REINFORCED \G \\ PROlECTENGINEER:BOAT Lffl TO REMAIN. — '-" '" CONCRETE SEAWALL CAP. l• 115gSRITK) S -vim r ..^g3":‘,1;": -,r: � � \ DYNAMIC ENGINEERING 14200 �� iV0`alil'; ;` � 0i• \'`i FEB 2 5 2 I t9 SOLUTIONS,INC. 1 -11/111. '� c as I S.Cypriote Rod,Suite E — (22)NEW CONCRETE BATTER \ Pompano Buck FL 33060 r ,11 ruwlL aEsonsc I s DIYIsroH Tel:(954)545-1740 Ir f ` o ��` ,'4�' w PILES SPACED 10'O.G MAX. D RTMEN7 OF R t� \ nnll��}}}� GULATORY Fax:(954)543.1T21 G; 1 �' uLC,,J):yr bLl►ti'i'iu.L.:i.P A `=ECONOMIC R SOURCFs 1 1J CONSIDERED VIEWING V.,: St.:'_'SIG:4ATt 1�:DATE 1 -� NEW 7,000 LB PLATFORM.TOTAL 33.2 SF tail 4' CAPACITY DOUBLE" — �P ; i �f��' JET-SKI LIFT. ��.c CO / _ !y49'-7s �� I Wil': ; tn NEW 7•STEPS .mss w__ .. r • ALUMINUM / U sAx?a%/fchz ��a :--- __ " -•n ! fin. \� 7' �' or 1 LADDER. �/ �� jrt��I%��i� �� \ (-160.-9" � �� \ mss+ / :� Gcn . •/ '� FJISTING CONCRETE �, \ \\ • :`.OR:`' r' Is IPS., .' EXISTING MONOLITHIC SEAWALL TO REMAIN , \ 7 --- G CONCRETE SEAWALL 94:31, `• \\\ labs O�m7iaa j111 TO REMAIN. .4 ` PE 52773,CA 26829 L. EXISTING CONCRETE +4/R 0 IZP P 6 g X53-V KING PILES TO REMAIN.0 lig D ' b PERMIT DRAWINGS �y Issue k Issue Date 4 0 January 31,2019 PROPOSED CONDITION -544 Lukeriew Caurt- \\ Mianii&adl,FL RER-NATURAL RESOURCE'\;' SIGN � NA \ RIRELIMi ' ' APP ►',. PROJECT.IS-7755':r — \\ DATE z .2/1" /q PROPOSED CONDITION �_.-.._ ._ .__.�_.._..�.- _ 11 .__.. CALE AS SHOWN REST NO. Ci) ffliiiiial w ` N lilb 11:[11•I IZFT - LAZENBY DOCK NEW REINFORCED NEW 12"x12'P.S. MODIFICATION& NEW SEAWALL CAP. CONCRETE BATTER PILES SEAWALL REPAIR { I O'MAX. SPACED 10'O.C.MAX. PROJECT Miami Buck Florid„ EXISTING 36'MONOLITHIC /N CLIENT: CONCRETE SEAWALL TO REMAIN. , MR-MATTHEW LAZENBY �./ ,/i!!//�: / / �/ / ' r� /f/ /, - / / l t ,J54;Lakeview d,Miami Bcxb,FL '/ //%`+/f�jJF` J/ ` f/.,.///-/, i � / // +/ ji./ „ // i // %/// J!�%J//'/ % / . �,� 7 ,/ // ENNRONMEWALCONSULTANT/j "i'�/ /. /,ff//�/�/l/!I%/f%/'�// j �, OCEAN/ '/ ' // ' ` ' ' ' , / / CONSULTING,LLC I •/ • . //' • ,,/, / f / !•/ . I //////a./;/ / / / /, 340 Mixers • Saile7Mixers Meow Gables,Florida 3)134 Tel,(305)921-9344 l LI.Y/aS Far:(3051677.3254 EXISTING 36” � CONTRACTOR: EP • UPL-1NON _ MONOLITHIC CONCRETE.i'�� x.4 SEAWALL TO REMAIN. 21. r% E II � T •r Liv EXISTING SEAWALL CONDITION PROPOSED SEAWALL CONDITIONS Op DETAIL(TYP.) SCAtEi -,I'`0' FEB 25 2019 SCALE3f'=1'-0' NATUffALRESOURCES DIVISION PROJECT ENGINEER: 1 1' W[TH3:C DAl NEW RE F�E Z�%LILGU -DYNAMIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS,INC. 1 TOP;(2)05 BARS MIDDLE;(4),55 BARS BOTTOM; 351 S.Cypee.i Road,Suite 303 . 1 VAR. 63 HOOPS AT 12"O.C.,3"O.C.OVER ALL PILINGS Pompene Beach,FL 33060 "-9"MAX_ 4'_6" EXTENDING 12"EACH SIDE OF PILINGS. Tel-(954)545.1740 USA rLF AN R ACK;ILI.PPR FAC Fuc:054)543-1721. STANDARDS IN ALL AREAS ' t 1 /'I9,!Ur Ur LAI' I I SEAS'SIGNATURE:DATE BEHIND NEW SEAWALL CAP., ,,‘,..47, 1�'t...,. • • • e EL.44.44NAVD 1 VAR. FXISTING36" I• • .. • '- Co -1 MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ' •- •1 :o X �` 2'-9'MAX- i, '` /•' .,.' If( SEAWALL TO REMAIN. DRILL&DOWEL 05 HOOKS AT • NEW 12•X12"P.S.CONCRETE �'3,%"i..t".N-'7„.,�•� `o TOP OF CAP 12"O.C. P.)6"MIN ym / { 1t•S.,` BAT ER PILES SPACED 10 O C. . , �� EL.+1.18'NAVD EMBEDMENT IN TO EXISTING U v �r ti '� SEAWALL TO EXTEND IS".—I I I-1 I 11-6" N MAX,DRIVEN TO A 25-TON N 77 , , MIN.HEARING CAPACITY. ,,D I" ` m 1 •l,s I—�� IWiW LINE �._-..-.�7� MHW LINE . .- ,/� T[/ 1 T JI �EL.+0.i4NAVD �1��IT_ �EL_40.14NAVD �/ I• EXISTING TBE BACK U r r- sada 44- �/ //� ROD TOREMAIN. EX[STING TIE BACK �� PE l2133,Ck126329 i 1- ' ' ROD TO REMAIN_ 111--/i DI 'I//////// F �EL.-2.asNAVD � � �3 V€L-a.NAVD PERMITDRAWENGS ✓ / I/ o Iuuc R Iaiue bale EXISTING RIP RAP `' EXISTINGIN P RAP 1Q January 3l,2019 / TO REM.iIN. EXISTING iK" f,_._. �/ /r .:-.,I-.r ` MUNOLIIHIC1CONCRETE =/i_.:/ .. TY , I / / 1 •! SEAWALL TO REMAIN. ;/' l// �� 1 �. . f - \ i •''. PROJECT I3-4753 -,•..,,".•,= .._. - "„�„� *''►<<f 't9 - SEAWALL DETAILS AND SECTIONS ��jj '� ' SCALE,.AS SHOWN EXISTING SEAWALL SECTION �► PROPOSED SEAWALL SECTIONc.) NAM SHEET NO SCALE 313 1'-0” SCALE LE ['_p+ DATE -_ .•______.__ -- S-4 -..___. -----------___ —.— _-T------------------ ---- - ---._._.___ LAZENBY DOCK • NEW REINFORCED NEW 12"x12"RS.CONCRETE BATTER PILES MODIFICATION& CONCRETE SEAWALL SPACED 10'O.C.MAX DRIVEN TO A 25-TON SEAWALL.REPAIR CAP/VIEWING PLATFORM MIN.BEARING CAPACITY BETWEEN PROJECT EXISTING KING PILES. MYiiiI Hawk Florida CLIENT EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE S' $ 10'MAC KINGPILETOREMAIN. SEAWALL CAP TO { `� fi MR MATTHEWLAT.ENBY EXISTING CONCRETE REMAIN. 0° I 5414al c.icw Cr,CYe ei Brarh,f4 SEAWALL TO REMAIN. �� 4— r ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT �7 lam%t ,/ m. -., / i 'I �/ /// OCEAN � � �/i/ ��i// CONSULTING.LLC / / Oity / � � ! 3411 Mm6.0 Aveauq Suite 7 /�: / / �/ / / /� �/•�// /�/ / �? / f r/ / { 0441 7 ]Oal jyeide 33134 1 ///�/// !////%//i/��/j/� /1 /` �////�/ J�// Far t303 677.3254 //it , ,..C.!r7. Y:v I Lrtl,vnc • f•J't A477+ OA EXISTING CONCRETEEXISTING KING SEAWALLTOREMAIN. PILESTOREMAIN. FEB 25 20D ® 49 Fli.111RAL RESOURCES DIVISID'1 EXISTING SEAWALL CONDITION 0 PROPOSED SEAWALL CONDITIO . DETAILDeA "' ' rrG(TYP.) no •__.E ERI s DETAIL(TVP.) DYNAMIC ENGINEERIN SCAI.EJI'-I'•0" SCALE?Ya'-I'-0' SOLUTIONS,INC. 351 S.C710caf Raid Sew 303 I r VAR. 4,b„ I Pompano Bead FL 33060 i, 1- 2'-1"MAX. Td•(954)545-1740 7.1"r•!e s u q VICFIL. ^E FBC— • _ --_ ._ TOP OF_CAP _-.--__i ; F",-(954)545-1721 mv EL.+4.44'NAVD I STANDARDS IN ALL AREAS...'�. .: '-." • _• e e e o SEAL 151GNA7LItE!DATE EXISTING CONCRETE BEHIND NEW SEAWALL CAP,,'•`•' '•`I;,;z-== - NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE I •..h i''f-'--''• o VAR. SEAWALL CAP TO REMAIN. r::;=:'F e r SEAWALL CAP!VIEWING PLATFORM • :� 2'-9^MAX. 3' ';4:21:.''-` - '"- WITH Y.CHAMFERED EDGES.USE 405 ,, n f • e i '• BARS TOP;(2)115 BARS MIDDLE:(4)B5 DRRL&EOWELNSHOOKSAT;- ..+-., • i�9" X' I T P n. -q BARS BOTTOM;M3 HOOPS AT 12"D.0-,3" •;'^• e 2 , , EL.+1.16'NAVD Off') ;;t:,;'..P. �� ®�1 B" O.C.OVERALL PILINGS EXTENDING 12' I +.' �, . c ••• 1.. Lain EMBEDMENT IN TO EXISInaa , / �. If 1/ r�'�!�!�/�//�. SEAWALL TD EXTEND Ur. i,%i�//�. . �� l`: . 4, //// EACH SIDE OF PILINGS. f/ ,44��tie,o f 1'6 MHW LINE �„.A. 'ZsA. .�44 1'-6” 1-6 . V MHW LINE O /41 .f:: �`' a ✓' 1 EL 40.14 NAVD %/�%/ [ EL.+0.14 NAVD E - �!� EXISTING TIE BACK1 ��\ U EXISTING TIF SACK-,11-.%e',„ 3.6-6Ob.lid.. �� f / TO REMAIN. BEHIND TO REMAIN. r�% / �3 MLWLINE 144 PESM33.Cit26029 ``7 / MLW LINE Fr �4 V EL.-2.06 NAVD .'4.2 EL-2.06 NAVD o PERMIT DRAWINGS / NEW 12"X12'P.S.CONCRETE (23 ��; BATTER PR•FS SPACED 10'O.C- Is��e N hone Date EXISTING CONCRETE MAX.DRIVEN TO A 25-TON MIN. ✓,� SEAWALL PILTO RFA4AIN / / EO BEARING CAPACITY. a January)l,ZOi 9 / E r EXISTING RIP RAP a / _.EXISTING Rl.a • RAP /,,i// _-1 -__ - IU1t6MAIN. J// % 1 ,` TO REMAIN / -" / // 11 i1•m 2.:// `.. '- /!// , ,, PROJECT 15-4755 q4, 7 RCES DIVISION NAM L SEAWALL DETAILS ONS AND SECTIONS SCALE:AS SHOWN EXISTING SEAWALL SECTION(TYP.) C PROPOSED SEAWALL SECT 0 : 9 70161/1 j SHEET NO. SCALE)(i'••1'-0' $ SCALEir-F.0' i� I cl • ___—_______..-._.__---___._._ ___ ____. _— LAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& NOTE: fI SEAWALL REPAIR THE FOUNDATION OF THE SEAWALL HAS BEEN iPROJECT IIII Mini Bench,Plaids DESIGNED TO STRUCTURALLY ACCOUNT FOR • CLIENT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALL W/TOP OF CAP - MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY 544 Leke.iw CL Miami Beae1.FL ELEVATION UP TO 5.70'NAVD. 3)140 — NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE SEAWALL CAP/ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT VIEWING PLATFORM WITH*CHAMFERED EDGES. OCEAN IT USE(4)65 BARS TOP;(4)63 BARS MIDDLE;(4)NS BARS CONSULTING,LLC BOTTOM;#3 HOOPS AT 12.O.C.,3'O-C.OVER ALL 340 Minoru Avenue.Suite 7 PILINGS EXTENDING I r EACH SIDE OF PILINGS- Coal 0161a,Florida 33134 Tel:(305)921-9344 USE CLEAN BACKFILL PER FEC I Fea;(305)677-3254 STANDARDS IN ALL AREAS I VAR• 41_6., r CCONTRACTOR:BEHIND NEW SEAWALL CAP. 3'-9"MAX. I TOP OF CAP s EL.+5.70'NAVD r:. • • • • 1� 'T NEW IrxI2"P.S.CONCRETE PROJECT ENGINEER: • in BATTER PILES SPACED 10'O.C. .:•. .. "•: MAX.DRIVEN TOA 25-TON MIN. DYNAMIC ENGINEERING DRILL A DOWEL#5 HOOKS AT ~=•" • ° • • /// HEARING CAPACITY. SOLUTIONS,INC. I VO.C.(TYP.)6"MIN;::•=..:4.-on. r Pamprw Baeh.51 S.Cypress FL 33060 d,Suitt 303 EMBEDMENT IN TO EXISTING `(`•'� P Tel:(954)545.1740 SEAWALL TO EXTEND I8". (�%%��jj,,.. A Fur:(454)S15-1721 ):%V.,%.•• 1` !...p. L 1,v.. ,M �'�` � /' 1 0 -EL.40.14 NAVD a' ' , 'N, OM m • � / 13 yMLWLINE �.-Z.�1 - EXISTING TIE BACK 1/i • EL.-2,06 NAVD . O BEHIND TO REMAIN. �/ li�� ....... /// ` EXISTING RIP RAP f` TO REMAIN. 1,--0 ' ! p. %2 a.- � , L_..._.--.\ PERMIT DRAWINGS • I• ssue N Irene Date _ Q May 14,2019 • ag1g,SIIVIEM ! • FUTURE PROPOSED SEAWALL SECTION(TYP.)C) MAY 21 2Ot9 PROJECT:15-6755 SCALEN"r-0^ 5 o1111S10N • 1y la RESOURCES TCRY •• FUTURE PROPOSED CAP DEPARYA4CN7 of REt1UlA EL.+5.7'NAVD AND COON itlC RESOURCES SCALE:ASSHOWN SHEET NO. i . ___ —_-- ---._� ---�. ---•--- LAZENBY DOCK 44' • (6)NEW CCA TREATED 12' MODIFICATION$ i 1 8'-5" 82-5" W-J" �--No W-5" 13'-4" 1's DIA.FENDER PILES DRIVEN SEAWALL REPAIR A J _ TOA BEARING PROJECT CAPACITY.CITY. Muni Pryq REM* • CLIENT F *1 I®I ®1 El = .. ® `® MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY 544 Review Cl.Mimi B d,.l I. '�r.►�. s• ' -Y�' [trs�1 ,'1[ Tr �P 33140 co Yrs, I'll Tr-9 rTrs-L , ?rti�- FF m ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT .. Trr-4l. gr.% l'4-ni ''2'—i';•: - Tr"' ^ OCEAN CONSULTING,LLC '� ....11737.1 ��1. • 740 Minorco Avenue.Suite T ►j�l i- 7 E; ;I;Eh i Cant Gables,Florida 33134 "ea t _ _IL1' - t Tel.(3031921-9344 Fat:(305)677.3254 P 1.71 CONTRACTOR: PT 4'x4'TIMBER BLOCK ATTACHED NEW l2'x 12'P.S.CONCRETE NEW IPE,BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, I'WIDE TO CONCRETE PILE CAP W/(2)i"DIA. PILES DRIVEN TO A 25-TON MIN. )a"x 6",DECKING BOARDS REINFORCED WEDGE ANCHORS 21.MIN.EMBED. BEARING CAPACITY.MIN 4' SECURED WITH(2)S.S.DECK CONCRETE BEAM. 4' 4x4 BLOCKS ARE SAME LENGTH OF EMBED INTO CAP. SCREWS AT EACH STRINGER. ESgSaV :v • PILE CAP o24"OR 12'LONG. no PROJECT ENGINEER I B 2 S 2019 DYNAMIC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS,INC. • ATTACH PT 3-x10-TIMBER NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION 351 S.CSE Read,Suit 303 -- STRINGERS W/(2)Ye ANCHOR — DEPARTMENT tic n'Er I:•ATl3 ��a�.FL)3060 ;� BOLTSW/7"MIN.EMBED INTO AND CONOMIE RESOURCE Td(951)545-1140 '"% TO CONCRETE BEAM AT 5'O.C. Fax(954)545-1721 7 I *----.-- 1II-- -y y, 1 SEAL/SIGNATURE:DNB: APACITY . DOUBLE 7,000 LB C TFT.SEE oe' ' in m N NEW •CONCRETE / �3 I • SPECIFICATIONS ONS-10. 5 '2 NEW 2•-0-WIDE x F-10'DEEP r DOCK_ ( •I REINFORCED CONCRETE PILE CAP t. L�� ATOP NEW CONCRETE DOCK PILES. ► . 7 ' r• m + .-.70 • TOP CJF DOCK d' ' ,-.0,:, C•► •[Ok:•':•'' a IIIGGG]]]FFF �EL+4.44'OC �Y'. I 4.4.- � ATTACH FI'3'x10"TIMBER STRINGERS WITH ilk. "1,..... . 1_— (2))P DIA.LAG BOLT WITH 3"MIN.EMBED D I I ohn efJ INTO 4x4 BLOCKS OR ATTACKED TO PE 32733,CA 26129 ;et CONCRETE BEAM WITH Y."ANCHOR BOLTS. PERMIT DRAWINGS E. .EL+0.14MHW 'A VD R- A RAL RESOURCES i ION lane M lou a Date EXISTING P-E MIN•'r AP 4 n January 3l,2019 SEAWALL CAP , - ..a; 1 TO REMAIN. ! L' �J �JI ------ "4i i. MLW LI Ms 4 T TIG 1` 7/' L---� Imo. r�� i �EL.-2.06'NAVD . t • . . PROJECT:15-4755 • DOCK FRAMING PLAN !I. y-o el DOCK FRAMING PLAN 0 e - SCALE:AS SHOWN lNtl.Cll-IFEET JET-SKI LIFT SECTION(TYP.)� SHEET NO SCALE.114'_1•-0' S 6 • r —.- _---1 , _ . _ �_ - -- — LAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& PAIR GOLDEN ENGINEERED ELEVATOR LIFT SPECIFICATIONS SEA PRROOL CT' TNNG0.6TRUCT.OM 14a 00111 DE SIGNSO ASAWW MIND FORCE GED:NINO MMmi Bead6 Florida CLIENT. :lN 505T1µWITH CAM/LAMB°DANND TYAND WLOADS N COLCLMNGS WON THE O ►/' ' FLORIDA 01240046 coos 20 , GT.2209,ADM 20222•AN3ASCE 7-10•WNA0IW © .;-'. ;�.Rey Q 2001022a LoSFORBULDINO24MGT.SANDOTIERSTRUDIUPETTOW1niW TAMI END MR.MArrlll;wLAZENI3Y t O LOADS ASSOCIATE]WIN AN LRTIMATEIMMO 2011DOP IISMPH-EXPOSURE V% 544 Lavoie*CI.Mian BndLFL 0322 CATEGORY.11 AMORS12r1 PRESSURE IO RIPSF.DYNAMIC ENON00 12 33140 1 SOLUTIONS HAS No COMM OT TIE IMNUFACMWO.PFAFONNMJCE 014 '• Fl. 0 l INSTALLATION COITUS PRODUCT.TIE 001232 0 PUNS 22003212003030002 LF ACCORDANCE M TN ACCEPTED 0N6EE10NOPAAcr®AMD DATA PDONDEflm ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT • i; \.` ` 0TPn0I2E2:1e.r.0Saleona,O.a OCEAN i•�• .i�+ O t11 1 AAA D^1r CONSULTING LLC \:. PE SESS,CAMSA 11 Isis.times Rai,SW.= 340 Minorca Mame,Suite i 1 Buck n syaaa 7; •In,Florida 13134 r+l 1l O `1 [MIMS-1M Fax IpLI4/s1T21 /4'�TJ •I, i1•L�1 !- I T A __ ��1 j if • \\ Q f1213/4...3-1/1. ��M 14��. 1• E v a 4-a W FROM II N �IIIfE NEW DOCK.ONCRETE 1�1 (� 1 �` FATE) 2 1 �� 4 1 ':' % FEB Nli),‘ `� �� R4IRES 5?019 4r TOP OF DOCK j •" 4�A Critp OURCF"p1�1Sf i 4 ES.+4,44'NAVD �� / EXISTING30KLB– �l�ll� i ‘‘,.../' Q t5 lw:MSTED. PRO/ECTEN NEERINRT CAPACITY MPOSTBOAT ` r �'n DYNAMIC ENGINE6RING� I1 G `I S WALLM1oi3Nn SOLUTIONS.INC. LlFTTOREMAIN- l i•,�• 'i1 RAC 9MN MIS.Cu.=Rees.Stile NM INCLINE MOUNT OR VERTICAL MOUNT PRELIM] • 'A ••PR'V:L rPomp=a Buck io 33BCB NAME ..0401e:�tte Fax N541547.1721 . i 1I MIMI 11 lJ A. �?`-_--,�• 1 DATE /-'r 7 S /;:_•IATJRE/DATE EL. „NAVD ' o © 0 0 0 © o CP 19 h. LOT 00200E 111701 cin TA.d ammo owe MFJIDI IDEM MOM SOF CAW= MAY IMFM1 in PPM .mD4I Il.6S IMP 0M MRA IIryLp.TAaEPAL ;4 at: .. •,'.......1ti - 6 �MLW LINE ril�Nbu ]�aX• m1.i3 -. - .• _ maNN i f 71121 • ,f ba! # Daunt I'. r'- Z d EL.-2.06 NAVD in�itr no Y 2 m ' 4g wawa ..F}�-•- . (7.•L� '- ,Ka1 42.1 t?? ]IRMO '0, -. Rf]N�i! ..-0. cr 1 dr 'I R • • r la ni6T Nw !°PMWa11 . O Tyro wi'd- 0_ '� 1rit inD1a q Mone r ® p ��,.� IlI9::F' Tool ?a1ID S •TR:i•_11 M UaSa® f5f. 5 C C '�h•^, •i r^ • -- 4Da]I]AT ••PalIT* ]Fur 0 5 c ms..rmica bft00anle' • l Dura max.n `-1 TIM L. G ] PE 52733.CA 26629 '1N",l a..a ° o.� • ,_.,..<7 Tomo D: r 9Fmit PERMIT DRAWINGS • mare i 221 W�'IIF iw.".So r _ °MF R ON, %IV y .1.1 Issue# Issue Date ' m i0in0 •• lg f? m.rc © January •• I o. ;l0 .aYn µMM. v -9 a—x• •• RWXlOqN�] PAPil NO • . Afm/ ,.4 MI 11;111207 1.. ti PROJECT:15-4755 4-POST BOAT LIFT SECTION � 8 I2 n "124°.."$ ;°a'O m TAM 'a®� e.t.a aYif• a >�•• o 1g ""� r l.P05fBOATLiFTSECTION SCALE 3/6- 1'0• (� ]'0 11* AND/ET-SKI BOAT LIFT 'v.wn °4a1 Q -MVO'N.aT ]xa` L�"R't wi+D r S!■ ° ?=ar SPECIFICATIONS i yma, ,1cW f.�Nr[I� APART pq �a Arr. {TY _ FUN a.wna SALE;AS SHOWN li.a.Pt o1�NAt ] F. J SHEET NO. Golden MOnuladurinp,Inc.17611 East$rcet,North FDA MyNa,FL 33917 Pu'.0810 1355 NW 97 AV SUITE 200 EXHIBIT"A" MIAMI,FLORIDA 33172 N a p F.t , u r x r g L?rs Jnr. TELEPHONE:(305)264-2660 SURVEY No. 11-0001105-19 FAX:(305).264-0229 SHEET No. 3 OF 3 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS DOCUMENT IS NEITHER FULL NOR COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL SHEETS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SURVEY OF LOT 1 &2, BLOCK, OF SURPRISE POINT ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN THE PLAT BOOK 43, PAGE 77, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE S 05°14'12"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 FOR A DISTANCE OF 295.35 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 18°54'18"W FORA DISTANCE OF 5.14 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENT CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 174.36 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 69°07'31';AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 210.35 TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE N 18°57'14"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.53 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENT CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 191.90 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60°52'07';AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 203.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINING. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 1,599 SQUARE FEET OR 0.04 ACRES,AS MEASURED TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PROPOSED SEA WALL CAP IMPROVEMENTS PLUS 1 FOOT OF BATTER PILE WHERE BATTER PILEINTERSECTS THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. Digitally signed by GEORGE IBARRA DN:C=USS Florida,I=Miami, o=NOVA SURVEYOR,INC., cn=GEORGE IBARRA, email=novasurveyors@gmail.com Date:2020.08.28 12:50:14-04'00' BY: 08-27-2020 GEORGE IBARRA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No.2534 LB#6044 STATE OF FLORIDA(VALID COPIES OF THIS SURVEY WILL BEAR THE EMBOSSED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE ATTESTING LAND SURVEYOR). NOTE:NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL SEAL OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR AN MAPPER PROPERTY ADDRESS: 544 LAKEVIEW CT. MIAMI BEACH,FL.33140 Page 743 of 1576 1255 NW 97 AV SUITE 200 EXHIBIT".4" MIAMI,FLORIDA 33172 Nn L ur rtucrz ,1nr. TELEPHONE:(305)264.2660 SURVEY No. 11-0001105-19 FAX:(305)264-0229 SHEET No. 3 OF 3 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION SE COR LAKE VIEW DRIVE S89°5634"E THIS DOCUMENT IS NEITHER AN CI1 ROKEE 375.00' FULL NOR COMPLETE WITHOUT 75.00' I NOTE: ALL SHEETS IBEARINGS ASSUMED f S89°56 24'E i 05 I �. i al In 1 R=120.00' GRAPHIC SCALE • P.O.C. --,..,.. L=127.63'�. L=127.63' NE CORNER Tan=70.60' r f O d=80°5630" SCALE:1"=60' �. CH=121.70' ! r, R=120.00' n i> At At L=57.54' •k \ � Tan=29.34' � Q=27°2837 ' 09 CH=56.99' y I 4.13 'Z' '.\ 0'�oy OAC �'"-- c-. _-�+C O kV kP 11 R=120.00' Q a l L=54.47' N 1 Tan=27.71' { 1 A=26°0070' 1 CH=54.00' �`� U 1 n R=RADIUS a 1 L=ARC LENGHT �:_-„ , \ y 1 1 tk Tan=TANGENT 1 A=CENTER ANGLE 1 CH=CHORD $' LOT-l 1 LOT-2 C =CENTER LINE = -ti1 P.B. =PLAT BOOK 1 ^^ PG.=PAGE E ..`\.. P.O.B. 1 m P.O.B.=POINT OF BEGINNING::^^� 'i8` l `` � � • X 11 R=191.90' 1L=203.86' -; ., EASEMENT AREA 110 60°52107” Dig DIta4cRRA A^^ ///q/ Cf1+194.4f' N18°57'14'1N r c) •*Nova^ ^..^;:-..-.. ////// 11 5.53' cn=GEORrke � „_, //// IP1 Date:202 B Y: li///////// ////// //%// /� GEORGE IBAR�h''"=.---_ :`µms` = �- - ///f//////f/ ^ .. SURP • ..IV ,. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No.2534L504;r 0 - ^ `il • ,. L A K E (N.A.P.) STATE OF FLORIDA(VALID COPIES OF THIS SURVEY WILL L■210.35' BEAR THE EMBOSSED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE Tan■720.11' _ OF THE ATTESTING LAND SURVEYOR). 45=69"0711 CH=197.83' PROPERTY ADDRESS: NOTE:NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL CHB=S72°3853"E 544 LAKEVIEW CT. SEAL OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR AN MAPPER MIAMI BEACH,FL.33140 • Page 744 of 1576 EXHIBIT"A" 1355 NW 97 AV SUITE 200 NOPtt urvrPgiars ,Jnr. MIAMI,FLORIDA 33172 TELEPHONE:(305)264-2660 SURVEY No. 11-0001 05.19 FAX:(305)264-0229 SHEET No. 1 OF 3 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS DOCUMENT IS NEITHER FULL NOR COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL SHEETS SURVEYOR'S NOTES: I.- THIS IS NOT A SURVEY 2.- THIS SKETCH WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OFA TITLE SEARCH; THEREFORE ONLY THOSE DEDICATION, ROAD RESERVATIONS OR EASEMENTS RECORDED ON THE PLAT ARE SHOWN HEREON. 3.- BEARING SHOWN ARE BASED ON AN ASUMED VALUE. 4.- THIS SKETCH DOES NOT INFER TITLE OR OWNERSHIP. 5.- DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY NOVA SURVEYORS INC. THIS27th DAY OF JULY 2020 6.- I HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THE SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 5J-1 7, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. Digitally signed by GEORGE IBARRA D"of. - o=NOcV S,st=floSURVEYOR da,NMiami, o=NOVA SURVEYOR,INC., cn=GEORGE 18ARRA, email=novasurveyars@gmail.com Date:2020.08.28 12:50:53.04'00' BY: 0B-27-2020 GEORGE!BARRA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No.2534 LB#6044 STATE OF FLORIDA(VALID COPIES OF THIS SURVEY WILL BEAR THE EMBOSSED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE ATTESTING LAND SURVEYOR). NOTE:NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL SEAL OFA FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR AN MAPPER PROPERTY ADDRESS: 544 LAKEVIEW CT. MIAMI BEACH,FL.33140 Page 745 of 1576 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-29454 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S 2011 CDM-SMITH STORMWATER (MANAGEMENT) MASTER PLAN (2011 SWMP) TO INCORPORATE THE CITY'S CONSULTANT, AECOM'S, RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO DEFINING "FUTURE GRADE," AND "FUTURE CROWN OF THE ROAD;" FURTHER MODIFYING SECTIONS 2.5.3, ENTITLED "PROPOSED LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS), AND 9.2.5 ENTITLED "SEAWALL HEIGHTS," OF THE 2011 SWMP, TO INCLUDE MODIFICATIONS TO THE LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR • CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, STORMWATER SYSTEMS, AND DEVELOPMENT TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FLOODING; A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT 1. WHEREAS, the City's Stormwater (Management) Master Plan (2011 SWMP) is intended to be a guide for improving the City's stormwater management system performance for the next 20 years, with considerations of potential sea level rise over 20-years of stormwater infrastructure and a 50-year planning horizon for seawall heights; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Resolution 2012-28068 on November 14, 201.2, adopting the 2011 SWMP; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Resolution 2014-28499 on February 12, 2014, which approved the recommendation of The Flooding Mitigation Committee to amend the 2011 SWMP by modifying the design criteria for the tailwater elevation from 0.5 Ft- NAVD to 2.7 ft-NAVD for all tidal boundary conditions; and • WHEREAS, the City adopted Resolution 2014-28684 on July 23, .2014 which accepted the recommendation of the Flooding Mitigation Committee to amend the 2011 SWMP for minimum seawall elevation from 3.2 feet NAVD to 5.7 feet NAVD, however the 5.7 NAVD elevation for seawalls shall not apply to minor seawall repairs less than $300 per linear foot at"2014 Consumer Price Index(CPI)"; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2014, the City Commission approved the revised standard seawall height at 3.2 NAVD with a caveat of an additional cap of 2 feet; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2015, the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Flooding and Sea Level Rise recommend that the seawall cap on all new private construction and all public seawall construction be changed from 3.2 feet NAVD to 5.7 feet NAVD throughout the City; however, on existing private seawalls that are being replaced/repaired not associated with new building construction, a minimum 4.0 NAVD elevation shall apply with the structural design to accommodate a seawall height extension to a minimum 5.7 NAVD; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2016, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 2016- Page 746 of 1576 4009 which amended Chapter 54 — "Floods", by establishing a minimum and maximum freeboard (minimum one foot / maximum five feet) above base flood elevation (FIRM BFE = not less than 6.44 NAVD) for all properties and amend the Land Development regulations pertaining to the calculation of building height, and establish minimum elevations of required yards in single family districts; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2016, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 2016- 4010, amended Chapter 118, of the Land Development Regulations relating to defining "future grade" and "future crown of the road;" and WHEREAS, the modifications to Chapter 54 and Chapter 118 were provided an effective date of June 8, 2016, so that these terms would be provided a definition and criteria in the 2011 SWMP, and the attached Addendum 1 to the 2011 SWMP, incorporates the definitions and changes to the 2011 SWMP to effectuate the new definitions for"future crown of the road" and "future grade." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission amend the City's 2011 CDM-Smith Stormwater(Management) Master Plan (2011 SWMP) to incorporate the City's consultant, AECOM's, recommendations relating to defining "future grade," and "future crown of the road;" further modifying sections 2.5.3, entitled "Proposed Level Of Service (LOS), and 9.2.5 entitled "Seawall Heights," of the 2011 SWMP, to include modifications to the level of service for construction of roads, stormwater systems, and development to reduce the risk of flooding; a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PASSED and ADOPTED this 8 day of June, 2016. ATTEST: p ; A / y" P,tii�li0 v e, Mayor R-fael E. Granado, City .17 :F 4• APPROVED AS TO • y• FORM& LANGUAGE f-- • &FOR EXECUTION * • INCORP ORATED-` Div --- 4 I is, ▪'▪• \ i (0 J k G1YAttorney Data 44,5 11miamibeach.govlfileslATT01BOUEIRES6SIS' - water Master Plan-Amend-reso 6-1-2016.docx Page 747 of 1576 COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution Amending The City's 2011 Stormwater Management Master Plan To Incorporate Modifications To The Standards For The Construction Of New Roads, Stormwater Systems,And Developments; Which Standards Would Incorporate Higher Elevations In Order To Reduce The Risk Of Flooding;And Defining"Future Grade"And Minimum Required Seawall Heights; And Which Documents Are Attached Hereto As Composite Exhibit A. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Ensure reliable stormwater management and resiliency against flooding by implementing select short and long- 1 term solutions including addressing sea-level rise. 1 Item Summary/Recommendation: The City adopted the 2011 Stormwater Management Master Plan(SWMMP)by Resolution 2012-28068. This plan is intended to be a guide for improving the City's stormwater management system performance for a 20 year planning horizon, with considerations of potential sea level rise over 20 years for stormwater infrastructure and 50 years for seawall heights. Periodically,due to updated climate projections,it is important to update the SWMMP to stay current and viable. The modifications proposed include provisions for new development to include roadway elevation, levels of service for roads, precipitation design rates and distribution, seawall elevations, and minimum future grade elevations. These items have been presented to the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Flooding and Sea Level Rise on several occasions. The SWMMP needs to be amended to incorporate modifications to the standards for the construction of new roads, stormwater systems, and developments;which standards would incorporate higher elevations in order to reduce the risk of flooding; redefine the level of service and design storm;and define minimum"future grade"and seawall heights; and which documents are attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Public Works Manual will also be amended to provide construction details referencing the SWMMP. THE ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDS ADOPTING THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Approved Funds: 1 2 3 OBPI Total Financial Impact Summary: City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Eric Carpenter, Public Works X6012 Sign-Offs: Asst. Department Director Assistant Ci ManagerlDPW j City • - er JJF ETC JLM T:I AGENDA12016UunelPublic WorkslStormwater Master Plan-summiry.docx Im M!AM I BEAC H Date Page 748 of 1576 Agenda 6 R75, MIAMI BEACH • City of Miami Soach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov C MMISSI'N MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members o the City C r� mission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 8, 2016 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AMENDING TH CITY'S 2011 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN TO INCORPORA MODIFICATIONS TO THE STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW ROADS, STORMWATER SYSTEMS, AND DEVELOPMENTS; WHICH STANDARDS WOULD INCORPORATE HIGHER ELEVATIONS IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FLOODING; AND DEFINING "FUTURE GRADE" AND MINIMUM REQUIRED SEAWALL HEIGHTS; AND WHICH • DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED HERETO AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A. BACKGROUND • The City adopted the 2011 Stormwater Management Master Plan (SWMMP) by Resolution 2012-28068. This plan is intended to be a guide for improving the City's stormwater management system performance for a 20 year planning horizon, with considerations of potential sea level rise over 20 years for stormwater infrastructure and 50 years for seawall heights. Periodically, due to updated climate projections, it is important to update the SWMMP to stay current and viable. The modifications proposed include provisions for new development to include roadway elevation, levels of service for roads, precipitation design rates and distribution, seawall elevations, and minimum future grade elevations. These items have been presented to the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Flooding and Sea Level Rise on several occasions. On February 12, 2014, the City adopted Resolution 2014-28499, which approved the recommendation of The Flooding Mitigation Committee to amend the SWMMP so as to modify the design criteria for a "tailwater elevation" be increased from 0.5 Ft-NAVD to 2.7 Ft-NAVD for all tidal boundary conditions; On July 21, 2015, the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Flooding and Sea Level Rise recommend that the seawall cap on all new private construction and all public seawall construction be changed from 3.2 feet NAVD to 5.7 feet NAVD throughout the City; provided, however, that for properties with existing private seawalls that are being replaced/repaired not associated with new building.construction, the Panel recommended applying a minimum 4.0 NAVD elevation, as Page 749 of 1576 Page 2 long as the structural design to accommodate a seawall height extension to a minimum 5.7 NAVD On May 11, 2016, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Ordinances 2016-4009, relating to amending Chapter 54 of the City Code entitled "Floods" to define City of Miami Beach Freeboard, and modify how grade elevation and height are defined due to flooding and climate change. Also on May 11, 2016, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Ordinance 2016-4010, relating to amending Chapter 118, of the Land Development Code, to incorporate the same Freeboard definitions, and procedures for how to determine grade elevation and height as a result•of flooding and climate change. The SWMMP needs to be amended to incorporate modifications to the standards for the construction of new roads, stormwater systems, and developments; which standards would incorporate higher elevations in order to reduce the risk of flooding; redefine the level of service and design storm; and define minimum "future grade" and seawall heights; and which documents are attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Public Works Manual will also be amended to provide construction details referencing the SWMMP. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accept the recommendation of the City Manager to amend the 2011 Stormwater Management Master Plan. Attachment—Exhibit JLM! IBAM/WRB F:WGENDA12O1611une1Public Works\Stamnwater Master Plan-merno.docx Page 750 of 1576 EXHIBIT A AECOM recommended changes to the 2011 CDM-Smith Stormwater Master Plan (2011 SWMP) • Modify Section 2.5.3 Proposed Level of Service to include, "Future crown of road and back of sidewalk elevations shall be 3.7 feet, NAVD, unless exempt due to hardship as determined by the Director of Public Works." • Modify Section 2.5.3 Proposed Level of Service to include, "For land development purposes, the future grade shall be 3.7 feet NAVD minimum." • Modify Section 2.5.3 Proposed Level of Service to state, "The stormwater level of service for roadways such that the crown of road is not overtopped during the 5 year/24 hour design storm event with the following parameters: o South Florida Water Management District nomograph with 1.25 safety factor. o The rainfall distribution shall be the SCS Type Ill. o The Unit Hydrograph peaking factor shall be 150." • Modify Section 2.5.3 Proposed Level of Service to state, "New construction or substantial reconstruction on private property shall retain storm water runoff from the 5 year/24 hour design storm of 7.5 inches of rainfall." • Modify Section 9.2.5 Seawall Heights to state, "All new seawalls on private construction and all seawalls constructed on public projects shall have a minimum elevation of 5.7 feet, NAVD, however, on existing private seawalls that are being replaced/repaired not associated with new building construction, a minimum 4.0 NAVD elevation shall apply with the structural design to accommodate a seawall height extension to a minimum 5.7 NAVD." • Page 751 of 1576 EXHIBIT A ADDENDUM 1 TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH STORMWATER (MANAGEMENT) MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT The City of Miami Beach's consultant, AECOM, has recommended modifications to the 2011 CDM Smith Stormwater (Management) Master Plan Final Report (2011 SWMP) in order to ensure the resiliency of the City, which recommendations are incorporated into the 2011 SWMP, as Addendum 1. The following amendments to the following sections of the 2011 SWMP are hereby amended and incorporated by reference into the 2011 SWMP, as follows: Ig • 2.5.3 Proposed Level of Service (LOS) As shown, CDM evaluated design storm events and joint tidal event periods to evaluate stormwater system performance and the project needs and costs to achieve various levels of service. The various evaluations for LOS indicated a point of diminishing returns at the 2 to 3 year storm event level Therefore, the City and .COM formulated options to best protect public safety and property with available funding. The 5-year, 24-hour (5:9 inches--of Tain fall) design storm of 7.5 inches of rainfall was also investigated due to current LOS standards. As an example, a 5 year LOS in the Flamingo 'Park Lummus Avenue project area would cost approximately $80 million, and the City available budget for this project area is approximately $35 million. Based on the supplied information herein, the City should determine whether an adjustment in the design storm is prudent as it relates to the future evaluation of LOS. "Future crown of road' and "future back of sidewalk elevations" shall be 3.7 feet, NAVD, unless exempt due to hardship as determined by the Director of Public Works. For land development purposes, "future grade" shall be a minimum of 3.7 feet NAVD. The stormwater level of service for roadways such that the "future crown of road' is not overtopped (flooded) during the 5 year 1 24 hour design storm event shall be constructed utilizing the the following parameters: o South Florida Water Management District nomograph with 1.25 safety factor. o The rainfall distribution shall be the SCS Type Ill. o The Unit Hydrograph peaking factor shall be 150. Page 752 of 1576 EXHIBIT A New construction or substantial reconstruction on private property shall retain storrnwater runoff from the 5 year / 24 hour design storm of 7.5 inches of rainfall. * * 9.2.5 Seawall Heights This section provides recommendations regarding the influence of sea- level on seawall elevations. Condition assessment and solutions for rehabilitating the City's extensive network of seawalls was not included as part of the scope of the SWMP. In 2003, a preliminary inspection report on seawalls was produced by another consultant. This investigation identified the structural integrity of approximately 99 seawall sites throughout the City. That study did not include any recommendation of modifications to the seawalls to address sea-level rise considerations. The following are additional considerations related to seawall heights. • Seawall Height Consideration No. 1 As part of the City's consideration of long-term sea-level rise, a comprehensive inventory of City and private seawalls within the City of Miami Beach should be performed. The inventory should include survey of top (i.e., cap) of the seawall and condition assessment of its structural integrity. Seawall Height Consideration No.2 • Seawall height design standards should be consulted with coastal engineers and planners in accordance with procedures normally utilized in this specialty discipline (i.e., coastal storm surge estimation). A a . . . . — . • . - _ _ _ •• • _ - - - - _ -_- - - -- - - _ - . All new seawalls for private construction and all seawalls constructed on public projects (after June 8, 2016) shall have a minimum elevation of 5.7 feet. NAVD. provided, however, for existing private seawalls that are being replaced/repaired not associated with new building construction. a minimum 4.0 NAVD elevation shall apply with the structural design to accommodate a seawall height extension to a minimum of 5.7 NAVD. * * * Page 753 of 1576 Seawall Revocable Permit ORDINANCE NO. 2018„4220 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER B2, OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROPERTY;" AMENDING DIVISION 2, ENTITLED "REVOCABLE PERMIT;" CREATING A NEW SECTION 82-97, ENTITLED "APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEAWALLS ENCROACHING ON CITY SUBMERGED LANDS;" AND FURTHER AMENDING DIVISION 2 TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY AND CLEAN UP OF THE LANGUAGE OF THE CODE; PROVIDING CODIFICATION; REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, certain canals, which were constructed by the City, are the property of the City of Miami Beach; and WHEREAS, property owners that front City-owned canals often seek to fix or upgrade their seawalls; and WHEREAS, to replace an existing seawall can be an incredibly expensive process for the property owner; and WHEREAS, alternatively, placing a new seawall, in front of the existing seawall, and backfilling between the existing and the new seawall extends the length of the subject property, but encroaches into the City's canal; and WHEREAS, the alternative method can be more cost effective for the property owner; and WHEREAS, in order to assist property owners with a cost effective alternative to replacing seawalls, the City administration recommends creating a revocable permit process so that property owners adjacent to City owned canals, can reconstruct, in a cost efficient manner, seawalls that are resilient to sea level rise; and WHEREAS, the Administration also recommends additional amendments to the revocable permit procedures outlined in the City Code, in order to streamline such process and make it more efficient and user friendly. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. Chapter 82 of the City Code, entitled "Public Property," at Division 2, entitled "Revocable Permits," is hereby amended to, amongst other things, create Section 82-97, entitled "Application requirements for seawalls encroaching on city submerged lands." Chapter 82, Division 2, is further amended, as set forth herein, to streamline and make the City's Revocable Permit process more efficient. CHAPTER 82 Page 754 of 1576 PUBLIC PROPERTY DIVISION 2. - REVOCABLE PERMIT • • Or Sec. 82-91. -Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Property or City Property means any land, water (including, without limitation, the city's submerged lands). or air rights owned or maintained by the city, or in which the city holds an interest. Revocable permit means permission granted, in writing, for any use of real-property owned or maintained by the city, or in which the city holds an interest, by a person or entity;, establishing conditions for such user; providing for revocation by the city;, and establishing requirements for return of the property upon termination/revocation. Sec. 82-92. -Application requirements. Applicants for revocable permits shall submit the following application requirements prior to city commission consideration of the request: (1) A completed application obtained from the city's public works department-and (2)A title binder or title commitment or attorney's title opinion regarding title to the subject; city property and to the applicant's property abutting the subject city property,as required by the city attorney. (3) A statement explaining the reason for the applicant's request and showing the need for a revocable permit in connection with use of the applicant's property (4) A topographic survey by a registered surveyor showing existing conditions and a drawing done to scale depicting the public city property that-is-the-subject ete-rawest and the improvements proposed by the applicant, and indicating the exact dimensions of the improvements and materials from which the improvements will be constructed. (5) A map of the subject area showing the subject Grty_property highlighted and indicating all properties within a 375-foot radius of the subject property. (6) A fist (on gummed labels suitable for mailing) of names and addresses of all property owners of land located within 375 feet of the exterior boundary of the sebjeet citv,property, and a list containing the legal description of land owned by each property owner of land within the 375-foot radius. Page 755 of 1576 (7) A certified letter stating that the ownership list map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the real property and owners of land within a 375-foot radius of the subject city property and stating the source of the information. (8) A topographic survey of the applicant's property by a registered surveyor. (9) A nonrefundable application fee and a mailing fee, in the amount specified in appendix A. Additionally, the applicant shall pay all costs of advertising connected with the request. For applications involving uses of city property that • have occurred or are on-going at the time of application the application fee shall be as specified in appendix A. Sec. 62-93. -Procedures for city commission consideration of the request (a) Upon receipt of a completed application for a revocable permit under the provisions of Section 82-92 or Section 82-97 (for permit aoolications for seawalls that encroach into the city's submerged lands by more than four (4) feet), the city's public works department shall transmit setting—set a date for a public hearing on the request (b) For public hearings on applications subject to Section 82-92 and Section 82-97(a)(5), the city shall provide mail notice of the public hearing,at least 15 days prior to the hearing to owners of land lying within 375 feet of the sebjest applicant's property. The notice shall indicate the date, time and place of the hearing and the nature of the request and shall invite written comments and/or participation at the hearing. (c) The city-atte office public works department shall prepare the pe it and-an appropriate resolution granting the revocable permit for consideration by the city commission and, if the permit is approved, shall thereafter prepare and issue the proposed revocable permit. (d) The city administration shall review the request and prepare a recommendation based upon the factors set forth in section 82-94, which report shall be transmitted to the city commission prior to the public hearing on the matter. (e) At the close of the public hearing, the city commission may grant or deny the request. In so doing the commission may modify the proposed revocable permit. (1) If the request is denied, no application may be made based upon the same request for a period of six&months from the date of the denial. (g) The applicant may withdraw the request at arty time prior to the public hearing. If the request is withdrawn prior to expenditure of costs for advertising and mail notice, the mailing fee and advertising costs specified in section 82-92 or section 82-97, as applicable, shall be refunded to the applicant. If a request is withdrawn or deferred at the applicant's request after the expenditure of costs for the advertising and mailed notices, these costs will not be refunded and an additional mailing fee and advertising fee shall be assessed prior to rescheduling of the hearing. When a request is deferred at the city's request, no additional fee shall be assessed. Page 756 of 1576 Sec. 82-94. •Criteria for granting/denying revocable permits. 1LRevocable permits shall be granted or denied based upon existence of the following criteria: (t) That the applicant's need is substantial. (2) That the applicant holds title to an the abutting property. (3) That the proposed improvements comply with applicable codes, ordinances, regulations, neighborhood plans and laws. (4) That the grant of such application permit will have no adverse effect on governmental/utility easements and uses on the property. (5) Ater b—That the grant of the revocable permit will enhance the neighborhood and/or community by with such amenities as, for example, but without limiting the foregoing, enhanced landscaping, improved drainage, improved lighting, acd-improved security, and/or public benefits proffered by the applicant;- (6) That granting the revocable permit requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this article to other owner of land, structures or buildings subject to similar conditions located in the same zoning district. (7) That granting the revocable permit will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this article, and that such revocable permit will not be injurious to surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. In order to grant a revocable permit, the city commission must make an affirmative finding with respect to each of the criteria set forth above. These findings may be made by one motion addressed to all findings or, at the request of any member of the commission, a finding or findings shall be considered separately. •• • : : • . - ••_ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - = - - _ -- _ -. The revocable permit application shall be considered as a whole unless any member of the city commission shall request that the application be considered in parts, in which event the application shall be considered in such parts as requested. In light of the particular circumstances involved with each separate revocable permit request, the grant of any revocable permit shall not constitute or be deemed a precedent for the grant of any other revocable permit. (b) In addition, to the criteria, in section 82-94(a), above. revocable permits for seawell9 under Section 82-97, shall require compliance with the following additional criteria: Page 757 of 1576 (1) The seawall location may not. in any circumstance, be built at a location that would interfere with navigability. Should the proposed seawall interfere with navigability of the city's property (i.e., in this case, of the canal), then the applicant will be required, at its sole cost ani expense. to dredge and replace the existing seawall. (2) The city shall execute a perpetual easement in favor of the applicant. in a form reasonably acceptable to the city attorney, for as long as there is an encroachment into the city's submerged land. The easement will allow the applicant to use the city's land by fillina in the submerged lands, and obtaining access to the canal. (3) The applicant shall be solely responsible for maintaining the seawall. (4) General liability coverage of not less than $1_000.000, is required by the applicant. It shall include the City of Miami Beach as an additional insured, and shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement. All of the aoolicantfpermittee's certificates shall contain endorsements providing that written notice shall be given to the city at least 30 days prior to termination, cancellation or reduction in coverage in the policy. (5) The applicant shall indemnify and hold the city harmless for applicant's use of the city property covered by the revocable permit. Sec. 82-95. -Conditions, termination/revocation of revocable permits. (a) Each revocable permit shall state conditions for its issuance, including, but not limited to: (1) Use the permittee shall be permitted to make of the city property premises:i (2)The nature of the improvements permitted on the city property premises_.; (3) Requirements for maintenance of the city property promicoc. by the permittee:j (4) Requirements for indemnification of the city by the permittee and insurance as approved by the city's risk manager, including submission annually of proof of such insurance. (5) Requirements for condition of the city property promiceo.when it is returned to the city upon termination or revocation of the revocable permit. (6) Nonassignability of the permit, ewnsFFAIip. and (7) City and or its authorized representatives' right of entry on the city property to repair utilities within any city easement, to inspect the property to assure that it is being used and maintained in accordance with the permit, or to remove unauthorized improvements. Page 758 of 1576 (b)As a further condition of holding a revocable permit, the permittee shall pay an annual permit fee, as specified in appendix A. The fee shall be due on October 1 of each year and shall be prorated on a monthly basis for permits granted at other times during a permit year. The fee shall be collected by the public works department or by such other department as may be designated by the city manager. Notice of the amount due and instructions for payment shall be provided to permittees at least 60 days prior to October 1 of each year. The permit fee shall be applicable to existing and future permits. If the permit is revoked or otherwise terminated prior to expiration of the year for which the annual permit fee was paid, a prorated portion of the fee will be refunded to the permittee. lc) Unless otherwise stated in the revocable permit, the permit shall terminate after the expiration of 20 years, unless surrendered or revoked at an earlier date. (d) Ali revocable permits shall be revocable at the sole discretion of the city commission, which revocation may be without cause and for convenience, upon ten (10) days' prior written notice to the permittee. (e) The public works department, or other department as may be designated by the city manager, shall notify permittee of my violations of the permit tions. Any violations remaining uncorrected after ten (10) days from receipt of such notice shall be reported to the city manager and the city commission. (f) Revocation shall be by resolution of the city commission. No public hearing shall be required; however, the permittee shall be heard upon request prior to a commission vote on the resolution. (g) When a revocable permit is granted, the grantee permittee shall be responsible solely for recording the permit in the public records of the Miami-Dade County county and shall provide a copy of the recorded permit to the city clerk and the City's public works department within 30 days of the city commission's decision to grant the permit. Failure of the permittee to record a permit shall be cause for immediate revocation of the permit. Sec. 82-97. Application requirements for revocable permits for seawalls encroaching on city submerged lands. . (a) Applicants for revocable permits adjacent to the city's submerged lands may be required to build or re-build seawalls, and which seawalls cannot be located within the city's submerged lands. at more than four feet (41 from the property Zine, at its most distant location, without a revocable permit from the city. Property along canals owned by the city that encroach into the city's submerged lands shall submit the following application requirements tQ the city's public works department prior to any consideration of the request for revocable permit: (1)A completed application obtained from the city's public works department. (2)A title binder or title commitment or atterr>4v's title opinion regarding title to the city property and to the applicant's property abutting the city Property, as required by the city attorney. (3)A statement explaining the reason for the applicant's request and showing the need for a revocable permit in connection with use of the applicant's property. Page 759 of 1576 (4) A topographic survey by a registered surveyor showing existing conditions and a drawing done to scale depicting the city property that is the subiect of the request and the improvements proposed by the applicant, and indicating the exact dimensions of the improvements and materials from which the improvements will be constructed. (5) For a revocable permit application for a seawall that encroaches into the city's submerged lands by more than four(4)feet: (I) a map of the subject area showing the city property highlighted and indicating the owners of land on either side of the applicant's property. (ii) a fist (on gummed labels suitable for mailing) of the names and addresses of the owners of land on either side of the applicant's property. (iii) A certified letter to the city stating that the ownership list map and mailing labels are a complete and accurate representation of the owners of land on either side of the applicant's property and stating the source of the information. (6) A topographic survey of the applicant's property by a registered surveyor. (7) A non-refundable application fee and a mailing fee, in the amount specified in appendix "A," entitled "Fee schedule." Additionally, the applicant shall pay all costs of advertising connected with the request. (8) Applications for revocable permits for a seawall that encroaches into the city's submerged lands by less than four (4) feet: (i) shall be reviewed, considered, and approved administratively by the city's public works department, which shall consider the criteria in section 82-94: (ii) shall not require a public hearing under section 82-93 but,alternatively, shall require a building permit. Secs. 82-9$--82-125. -Reserved. SECTION 2. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission of the city of Miami Beach, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the Code of the city of Miami Beach, Florida. The sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such intention, and, the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word. SECTION 3. REPEALER. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. Page 760 of 1576 • SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect 10 days following adoption. PASSED and ADOPTED this /7 day of eC4Aer , 2018. ATTEST: 19 ::)e— Dan Gelber, Mayor XGrana 46J3cAt Rafdo, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM& LANGUAGE First Reading: September 12, 2018 & FOR EXECUTION Second Reading: TJ,OfC (---- ri- 4- q( (Sponsor. Commissioner John Elizabeth Aleman) City Attorney , oma. 4-#6 1C- Underscore denotes new language StFikettimigh denotes removed language 11(\i, ..1.....E3....6,4:\-) t :! CORP‘<c.:...,. .4i (CRATED' * 9 BCH 26 )/': .� Page 761 of 1576 Ordinances - R5 E MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: October 17, 2018 10:30 a.m. Second Reading Public Hearing SUBJECT SEAWALL REVOCABLE PERMIT AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 82, OF THE CITY CODE, ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROPERTY:" AMENDING DIVISION 2, ENTITLED "REVOCABLE PERMIT;" CREATING A NEW SECTION 82-97, ENTITLED "APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SEAWALLS ENCROACHING ON CITY SUBMERGED LANDS;" AND FURTHER AMENDING DIVISION 2 TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY AND CLEAN UP OF THE LANGUAGE OF THE CODE; PROVIDING CODIFICATION; REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ANALYSIS Certain canals, which were constructed by the City, are the property of the City of Miami Beach and are considered public lands. Property owners that front City-owned canals often seek to fix or upgrade their seawalls. One of the options is to completely replace the seawall, which can become costly. Another less expensive option consists of placing a new seawall in front of the existing one, and backfilling in between the walls. This option, however, may cause for the wall to extend the length of the subject property beyond the property line and encroach into the City's canal. The City Administration recommends creating a permit process so that property owners adjacent to City owned canals can reconstruct, in a cost efficient manner, seawalls that are resilient to sea level rise that encroach onto the City's land. Chapter 92 of the City Code is being amended to create Section 82-97, entitled "Application requirements for seawalls encroaching on City submerged lands." This section creates a public hearing process before the City Commission for seawalls that intend to encroach more than four(4) feet into the City's canals. The applicant shall be required to provide a 15 day prior written notice to all properties adjacent to the property where the seawall is being replaced. The seawall location may not, in any circumstance, be built at a location that would interfere with navigability. Should the proposed seawall interfere with navigability of the canal, then the applicant will be required to dredge and replace the existing seawall, rather than encroaching into the City's submerged lands. The construction of any seawall requires approvals of the County, the State of FP Ire 6ff 1 Florida and the Federal Government, which approvals would need to be granted prior to considering the application process complete. The application process requires the submittal of a number of technical documents and engineering drawings. Additionally, each applicant shall be required to indemnify the City and hold the City harmless, and provide the City with insurance, naming the City an additional party. At its September 12, 2018 meeting, the City Cornrussion read the Title of the Ordinance into the record and adopted it on First Reading. A Second Reading Public Hearing is scheduled on October 17, 2018. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends approving the Ordinance on Second Reading Public Hearing. Legislative Tracking Public Works Sponjor Commissioner Aleman ATTACHMENTS: Description Co FORM APPROVED SUBMERGED LAND ORD LAZENBY SEAWALL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 544 LAKEVIEW COURT CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTURAL IMPACT REVIEW OCTOBER 2020 The 544 Lakeview Court Waterfront Improvements Project proposes waterfront improvements along the property's riparian shoreline. The site is located on Lake Surprise in the City of Miami Beach, and is tidally connected to the larger Biscayne Bay ("Project"). Along the shoreline fronting Lake Surprise,the existing concrete seawall was previously constructed waterward of the 544 property line, and is currently built, and encroaching upon, City-owned submerged lands/property. The primary focus of this summary is to evaluate the potential for environmental and structural impacts to Lake Surprise, and the neighboring two adjacent properties, if the City of Miami Beach were to require complete removal, excavation, and relocation of the existing seawall back to the property line at the site. Currently, the Project proposes the following activities to safely provide access to the shoreline, and to meet City requirements for seawall improvements(height and strength): 1. Repair to the existing seawall by the installation of concrete batter piles, and the forming and pouring of a new concrete seawall cap that does not require complete removal of the existing seawall. 2. Installation of a new concrete dock with mooring piles. 3. Installation of two new boatlifts. The focus of this summary is primarily on the proposed seawall improvements. Environmental Impact — Lake Surprise is located in close proximity, and is tidally connected to, Biscayne Bay / Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve. Given its proximity, it is not unusual for seagrass communities to grow within the Lake Surprise water environment. These seagrass communities primarily consist of Halophiia decipiens (Paddle Grass) and Halodule wrightii (Shoal Grass), among other types. Typically found in similar water environments such as Lake Surprise would also be macroalgae, sponges, and limited coral coverage. Removal of the existing seawall would compromise these marine resource communities,both directly and indirectly. If the City of Miami Beach were to require removal of the existing concrete seawall at the property,excavation of the soil/spoil material back to the property line, and re-installation of a new seawall, most of the marine resources within a 15-30 foot footprint of the construction work would be lost due to direct impact from seawall removal activities(e.g. excavation and heavy demolition work, disturbance of submerged lands, poor water quality, smothering). There is a high likelihood of further habitat loss and water quality degradation from secondary, indirect impacts by shading and loss of sunlight from turbid Page 764 of 1576 544 Lakeview— Environmental & Structural Impact Review October 2020 Page 2 water generated during excavation to remove the spoil behind the existing seawall. This turbid water is notoriously difficult to control and would impact a larger area within Lake Surprise. As a result of these potential direct and indirect impacts to marine resources, complete seawall removal and relocation is not recommended. Typical practice for seawall replacement work is installation of new seawalls immediately waterward of existing, or repairs with batter piles and new seawall concrete caps (the latter is proposed for this Project). Structural Impact — In addition to marine resource impacts, there is the significant potential for structural damage to neighboring seawalls resulting from complete demolition of the existing seawall at the Project site. Currently, on both sides of the property, the existing seawalls abut each other. If there was going to be complete removal, the adjacent seawalls would need to be monitored for cracking and destabilizing movement from 544 seawall demolition. The resulting cracks and impacts to the neighboring properties would likely require significant repairs, if not replacement of segments of each,to avoid future failure. Removal of the existing 544 seawall and relocation landward would also result in a significant gap between property shorelines. This gap would require perpendicular seawall connections to shore up and seal the edges, resulting in additional costs associated with original seawall removal proejct. Conclusions Based upon the above findings, Ocean Consulting recommends a seawall repair project that does not require complete seawall removal, excavation, and placement landward. Marine resources and water quality will be protected, and the structural integrity of neighboring seawalls will be maintained. Page 765 of 1576 0EPARr4/4. FLORIDA DEPARTMENTOF RickGovernScott Environmental Protection Carlos Lopez-Canton It Governor 4 ° Southeast Distnct �� ' = e`. Noah Valenstein • -:__�: . 4� 3301 Gun pub Road,NlSCI210-1 OMfMrAt� G West Palm Beach,Fl.33406 Secretary 561.681.6600 November 29, 2018 Matthew Lazenby 544 Lakeview Court Miami Beach, FL 33140 Sent via e-mail: kirklofgrengoceanconsultingft.com Re: File No.: 13-0310928-007,008,009-EE File Name: Lazenby This letter supersedes the previous letter sent November 28,2018 for a technical error regarding the federal authorization. Dear Mr. Lazenby: On November 15, 2018, we received your application for an exemption to 1) replace the existing 480 ft2 dock with a new 499 ft2 L-Shaped dock, 2) install a new boatlift for a total of 2-slips, and 3)repair 208 In.ft.of seawall cap and install 22 batter pilings. The project is located in the Surprise Lake, Class III Waters, adjacent to 544 Lakeview Court, Miami Beach (Section 22, Township 53 South, Range 42 East), in Maimi-Dade County (Latitude N 25° 42' 24.01", Longitude W 80° 07' 38.28"). Your request has been reviewed to determine whether it qualifies for (1) regulatory exemption, (2) proprietary authorization (related to state-owned submerged lands), and (3) federal approval that may be necessary for work in wetlands or waters of the United States. Your project qualifies for all three. However, this letter does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining other federal, state, or local authorizations that may be required for the activity. 1. Regulatory Review—VERIFIED Based on the information submitted, the Department has verified that the activity as proposed is exempt under Chapter 62-330.05 1(5)(b), (12)(d), Florida Administrative Code, from the need to obtain a regulatory permit under part IV of Chapter 373 of the Florida Statutes. This exemption verification is based on the information you provided the Department and the statutes and rules in effect when the information was submitted. This verification will expire after one year, and will not be valid at any other time if site conditions materially change, the project Page 766 of 1576 File No.: 13-0310928-007,008,009-EE File Name:Lazenby Page 2 of 5 design is modified, or the statutes or rules governing the exempt activity are amended. However, the activity may still be conducted without further notification to or verification from the Department after the one-year expiration of this verification, provided: 1) the project design does not change; 2)site conditions do not materially change; and 3)there are no changes to the statutes or rules governing the exempt activity. In the event you need to re-verify the exempt status for the activity after the one-year expiration of this verification,a new application and verification fee will be required. Any substantial modifications to the project design should be submitted to the Department for review,as changes may result in a permit being required.Conditions of compliance with the regulatory exemption are contained in Attachment A. 2. Proprietary Review—NOT REQUIRED The activity does not appear to be located on sovereign submerged lands, and does not require further authorization under chapter 253 of the Florida Statutes, or chapters 18-20 or 18-21 of the Florida Administrative Code. 3. Federal Review—SPGP APPROVED Your proposed activity as outlined on your application and attached drawings qualifies for Federal authorization pursuant to the State Programmatic General Permit V, and a separate permit or authorization will not be required from the Corps.Please note that the Federal authorization expires • on July 26,2021. You, as permittee, are required to adhere to all General Conditions and Special conditions that may apply to your project." A copy of the SPGP V with all terms and conditions and the General Conditions may be found at http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/Portals/44/docs/regulatory/sourcebook/permitting/general permits /SPGP/S PGPV-Permit%20lnstrument-Complete.pdf?ver=2016-07-27-07 l 925-250. Authority for review - an agreement with the USACOE entitled "Coordination Agreement Between the U. S.Army Corps of Engineers(Jacksonville District)and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, or Duly Authorized Designee, State Programmatic General Permit", Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899, and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Additional Information Please retain this letter. The activities may be inspected by authorized state personnel in the future to insure compliance with appropriate statutes and administrative codes. If the activities are not in compliance,you may be subject to penalties under Chapter 373,F.S.,and Chapter 18-14,F.A.C. NOTICE OF RIGHTS This action is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition for an administrative hearing is timely filed under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., before the deadline for filing a petition. On the filing of a timely and sufficient petition,this action will not be final and effective until further order of the Department. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the Department's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Page 767 of 1576 File No.: 13-03 l0928-007,008,009-EE File Name: Lazenby Page 3 of 5 Petition for Administrative Hearing A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's action may petition for an administrative proceeding(hearing)under Sections 120.569 and 120.57,F.S. Pursuant to Rule 28- 106.201, F.A.C.,a petition for an administrative hearing must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name,address,any email address,any facsimile number,and telephone number of the petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests are or will be affected by the agency determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts that the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes that the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency's proposed action, including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency's proposed action. The petition must be filed (received by the Clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard,Mail Station 35,Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000. Also, a copy of the petition shall be mailed to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing. Time Period for Filing a Petition In accordance with Rule 62-110.106(3), F.A.C., petitions for an administrative hearing by the applicant must be filed within 21 days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than the applicant, and other than those entitled to written notice under Section 120.60(3),F.S.must be filed within 21 days of publication of the notice or within 21 days of receipt of the written notice, whichever occurs first. Under Section 120.60(3), F.S., however, any person who has asked the Department for notice of agency action may file a petition within 21 days of receipt of such notice,regardless of the date of publication. The failure to file a petition within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to request an administrative determination(hearing)under Sections 120.569 and 120.57,F.S.,or to intervene in this proceeding and participate as a party to it. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with Rule 28-106.205, F.A.C. Extension of Time Under Rule 62-110.106(4), F.A.C., a person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's action may also request an extension of time to file a petition for an administrative hearing. The Department may, for good cause shown, grant the request for an extension of time. Page 768 of 1576 File No.: 13-0310928-007,008,009-EE File Name: Lazenby Page 4 of 5 Requests for extension of time must be filed with the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, before the applicable deadline for filing a petition for an administrative hearing. A timely request for extension of time shall toll the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. Mediation Mediation is not available in this proceeding. FLAWAC Review The applicant, or any party within the meaning of Section 373.114(I)(a) or 373.4275, F.S., may also seek appellate review of this order before the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission under Section 373.114(1) or 373.4275, F.S. Requests for review before the Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission and served on the Department within 20 days from the date when the order is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Judicial Review Any party to this action has the right to seek judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, F.S., by filing a Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rules 9.110 and 9.190, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, M.S.35,Tallahassee,Florida 32399-3000;and by filing a copy of the Notice of Appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date this action is filed with the Clerk of the Department. If you revise your project after submitting the initial joint application,please contact us as soon as possible. Also, if you have any questions, please contact Stacy Cecil at the letterhead address or at (561) 681-6629 or by email at Stacy.Cecil(a�floridadep.gov. When referring to this project, please use the FDEP file number listed above. Executed in Orlando,Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ft/ Air Stacy Cecil Environmental Specialist II Southeast District Page 769 of 1576 File No.: 13-0310928-007,008,009-EE File Name:Lazenby Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned duly designated deputy clerk hereby certifies that this permit and all copies were sent on the filing date below to the following listed persons: FDEP—Chris Weller, Stacy Cecil Lisa Spadafina, Miami-Dade County RER, spadaL2(2Iniiamidade.gov Emily Nelson, emily a,oceanconsultingfl.com FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED,on this date,pursuant to Section 120.52, F. S., with the designated Department Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. colri aLLA rrtt November 28, 2018 Clerk Date Enclosures: Attachment A- Specific Exemption Rule Project Drawings, 9 pages Page 770 of 1576 Attachment A Chapter 62-330.051 Exempt Activities. The activities meeting the limitations andrestrictions below are exempt from permitting. However, if located in, on, or over state-owned submerged lands, they are subject to a separate authorization under Chapters 253 and 258, F.S., and Chapters 18-18, 18-20, and 18-21, F.A.C., as applicable. (5) Dock, Pier, Boat Ramp and Other Boating-related Work— (b)Installation of private docks,piers,and recreational docking facilities,and installation of local governmental piers and recreational docking facilities,in accordance with section 403.813(1)(b),F.S. This includes associated structures such as boat shelters,boat lifts,and roofs,provided: 1. The cumulative square footage of the dock or pier and all associated structures located over wetlands and other surface waters does not exceed the limitations in section 403.813(1)(b), F.S.; 2. No structure is enclosed on more than three sides with walls and doors; 3. Structures are not used for residential habitation or commercial purposes,or storage of materials other than those associated with water dependent recreational use; and 4.Any dock and associated structure shall be the sole dock as measured along the shoreline for a minimum distance of 65 feet, unless the parcel of land or individual lot as platted is less than 65 feet in length along the shoreline, in which case there may be one exempt dock allowed per parcel or lot. (12) Construction, Replacement, Restoration, Enhancement, and Repair of Seawall, Riprap, and Other Shoreline Stabilization— (d) Installation of batter piles,king piles,or a seawall cap, used exclusively to stabilize and repair seawalls, provided they do not impede navigation. Rulemaking Authority 373.026(7), 373.043, 373.4131, 373.4145, 403.805(1) FS. Law Implemented 373.406, 373.4131, 373.4145,373.415,403.813(1)FS.History—New 10-1-13,Amended 6-1-18 Page 771 of 1576 IAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& III NERAL BUTES: SEAWAI..I..REPAIR • -;' _ i 11• ` I. ELEVAT(1NS SHOWN REFER TO THE?KATI!AMERICAN VCRTR'AL DATUM MAVEN OF 1988. • _ 4fI •� AU.UIMFNSKK(S(7NILANSARE SUHJIITT>VI.RIFIIA'I'N)NInTIIL•'FIELD. PROJECT 3. r1153III:IN'IEN1'(W THESE PLANS IU HE IN ACCORDANCE WM1 APPLICABLE CODES AND AUTIII)RCIPIN Miami Bach,Florida r •` i, vY �' HAVING IURISDICIION.ANY DISCREPANCIES 111IW14N THESE PLANS ANU APPLICABLE 0131/10:tillA11111i CLIENT. 3�* •� r ' A/> IMMI])IAII'LY HRWOIrr 7U TIP.Al I7.N17ON OF ITK.IN11•:R111:F'(NU.PROCEEDING WITH WORK.COWOIMIA( ' S AND Alt SUBCONTRACTORS AKE KI•.SPONSIIII.FHM N.I.LINES,ELEVATIONS,AND MI:ASURINE:NTS IN MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY .;4....,a, A r 1 �'. - .y+Y� -, TT IS NTINTAMERWLAN �' s. .• i. r1 IS 1'lE CITON WMI 111 ERE POANS ANII'll lFi lll:SW INSIHILrIY IW'IHI:CYJNTNACT(Xt TIT(UMN.Y W fTH LIX'A(., 544 Lakeview Ll,Miami llna:hFL +,rye -' ' STATE,AND FEDERAL ENVIK(INMENCAI.PERMITS ISSUED RIR 71113 PROJECT.IT SMALL HE 1ILI1 CUNTRACI1RCti 33140 'a•17 �0 k �/: r - RESPONSIIIILFIY T)FAMILIARVI:AM)(XIVIRN IIIMSI:I.F HY AI.I.PROVISIONS OF 1NESE VI:RMrrs. •,•_ / ,j' `,, 5. APPLICABLE..HUILUING CODE:FLOREDA HUI LIR NO IT/DE,2017 EIRTRIN(AND CURRENT ADDENDUM). ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: `� .. `i • • - '.0 6. APPROVEU(IX(I RACr(Xc 1O DEIERMINE1F11E SU17A111I.IIY(WEXISTING STRUCTURES AN I)VI KIFY All. N I 3, DIMENSIONS.'nir APPROVED LONT1UCD)R IS KIIPUNSIRLE KM Al 1.METHODS,MEANS.SEQUIN('IS AND OCEAN • I �' t PIlOCE11URFS OP wl1UK. CONSULTING,LLC 1 7, IN NCFI SCALE DRAWINGS FOR UIMINSIUNS. 340 Minorca Asante,Suite 7 S. (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING UTIIXIf1•:S PI0(XI 70 COMMENCING:WORK. Coral(tables,Flmda 33134 r• 9. CMNTRACIOR TO PROPERLY FENCE AND SECURE AREA WI ni BARRICAI W S. 10. ANY DEVIATION ANIMJKSUBSTITUTION FR11M 1'11E INFYIRMA'IION PROVIDED HI(ID-IN SHALL BF.3UBMIT1D Tel:(305)921-9344 l ` 0)1'111.I:N(HN1:FR FOR APPROVAL MGM To lUMMI NCT MINI(H WORK. Paa:13051677-3254 1 II. ALL NEW MATERIALS ANINOR PATCHWORK SHALL HE.PROVIDED TU MATCH EXISTING MATERIALS ANIMIK CONTRACTOR: NIXXNING WORK WHERE:PRACTICAL EX('l]•T AS SPECIFICALLY NOTED HEREIN. 't -:,/ 12. LICENSED CONTRACTOR SHALL USE All.P SIIILE CARE:II/PRO ECT ALL FXISTINC:MAH(RI AILS.SIIRFA1-ti, I"/ AM)FURNISHINGS FROM DAMAGE DURING AU.H X'IASIS ICONS'RUCTION. JJJ 13. TIF LICENSED CONTRACTOR H1 INSTALL AND MIAOW ALL SIKIKING AND BRACING AS REIN MVO wit 1111: 4-- • FI 1 PROPER EXECUTION OE INE WORK. / 14. ALL NEW WORK ANI)ANC MATERIALS SIIAI.I.U)NHX(M TO ALL RIEQUIR1•:MENIS OF'EACH AMMINISTKA FIVE: / Iiouv HAVING JURISDICTION IN EMI!PERTAINING CIRCUMSTANCE. IS. '11JH(X)NIRACIOR WILL EMPLOY ANI)MAIN'I'AIN AIM4AJA'IE PIHIIMHNI'AND EitoSio9 CONIR(X.MIEASURES 'ICE MM EL'''.BISCAYNE.HAY PKOM SEOIMILN1'ANTI CONSTRUCTION 111.8KIS. PIE(111 1 til I ! •. ihi) IXICK:LL6UPSF PROJECT ENGINEER: • DYNAMIC ENGINEERING Hours SOLUTIONS,INC. I. AU,MOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS Sll•1:L.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 351 5.Cypress Road,Suite 307 ._./ Par,ro Bach,FL 33060 Lii Tel:19511343-1710 a4.- ia... WOOD Fn:(9541545.1721 t. PRIMARY WOOD FRAMING MEMBERS SHALL BE NUMMI-R I PRESSURE TREATED MARINE GRADE WIG D11 RN LOCATION MAl' AND LEGAL DESCI I' I PINOlt DOTER. _. ALDIMENSIONS ON PLANS ARE SUBJECT 133 VIRI FNAI1(N IN THE FIELD. SEAL/SIGNATURE/DATE p*4C 1-"Oi ( 's I. (1)NCREIE SHALL CONFORM TO ACI 3151LATEST LU.)AND SHALL BE REGULAR WEIGILT,SULFATI:RHSISIANI . . PROJECT SITE LOCATION: WITII A IN?SIGN SIRENGTC OF 5.000 PSI AT:SHAYS W/A MAX WATER-CEMENTMATERIALS RA7R),HY .i 544 Lakeview Court W I J(RIT,NORMAL W'E I(BTT AGGREGATE C ONCRI ll:0E0.40. , • f .. 1 '; Miami Hwch,Florida.33140 2, UWNIiK S11A11.EMPLOY AND PAY ISHI 11!SI'INM S!•RVI(i S FROM AN INDEPENDENT 1FITINU IAIRINA'IURY aI .'t.: yt, ' hl5C41/N(14111SAMPLINGANDT1111NUINACE1*l5ANl1EW/ASTM. • 1.ATIIUDE: 25 DEG 49'24.07"N 3. I.I(ENSEi1J CUNIRAC TUR IS RI•SPIJNSIHLE FOR1111!AIlIO(JAY(W FIRMSANU SMOKING ANU h1X(SAVE , 7 LONGITUDE: 8G DEG 738.23"W PkAC'IKIiINT11]RUSEANUREMOVAL. , l 4. 11)NCRI'IE COVER SHALL BE Y IJNLSSOTHERWISE 541111:71 ON APROVED DRAWINGS. 3. REINh1R(CINGS EELSHALLBEINCONRJRMANCIIWTI7111IELAIESTVERSIONOFASIMA613(iRN)I611 ;1 SN1IEKATK)NS.ALLREINIURCEMLNTSHALL Ill PLACIDINACCORDANCEW/ACI115ANUACIMANUAL.CIF�r; FOL10nu.:02-3223-012-0010 SIANDARI)PKACIICE PE52733,CA261129 ..:.,( 1.�,r w n. !MACES IN REINFORCING HAILSSHALL NUT BEL;SSTHAN M BAR DIAMETERSAND REINF(R(cINIi SMALL.RE _ .NCONMN000SAROUNDALLCORNERSAND(I1ANCIAINDIREECIN)N.CONTINUI YSHALLHEPIOVII)H)ATpERM1T DRAWINGS r' l 1 % RNPROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EAERSORCIIANU:S INDIRECTION BY HFMNLNCE1111LONGITUDINALST AROUNDTIF.CORNER 48 BAN DIAMIIEKS SURPRISEPOINTPB4377 IsslFeN IssueLte � k •�-'""" LOIS I&2 PILUKIVINGNOTES O October 18.2018 iL •"•'••••41, -47.=:. I. PALE DRIVING OPERATIONS SHAD.NE(5451iKVF71 BY A SPECIAL INSPECTOR,INCLUDING TEST PILI•.S LUT SIZE 39496 SQUARE FEET SUFFR'IINr TO DETERMINE,TNI:ANICOXIMAIE LIN(:I11 REQUIRED TO MEET DESIGN CAPAI'MY """ • I ,t' C'(SC 23024-4330/32 01 2005 4 PILES SIIAI.I.RE(DRIVEN USING AN APPROVFIICUSIIKIN MUCK CONSISTING OF MATERIAL 1X)ARRANCiI-])SO I• ••� +'. , AS1U PROVIDE THE'IRANSMISSION DE THE HAMMER INER(:Y. ( J 3. PII.IIS SHALL BE DRIVEN TO RVQUIRID CAPAC11Y A MIN 12.INTO BERM. PROJECT:15-1755 i "•'^ y�„+ •� • ' ��; �F;' 4, PILES SHALL HE DRIVEN WITH A DROP HAMMER OR GRAVITY ILAMM FRPROVIDEU'Hii HAMMER SIIAl.1. ,.. '.'� �' C• WE ill PX)IJ•:SS'111AN 3,000 POUNDS,ANI1'1111!FAIL IB'111E IIAMMIIK SHALL NOT EXCIi13.16 ET. • :. �;. �:) +, PROJECT LOCATION& •• S. P1LFS SHALL UE DRIVEN W1111 A VARIATION OF NOT MORE TI IAN 1.-VER Four mom 111E VER'11CAL.(IR FROM �. ;i. ?�• ." 1111.OATH R LINE INDICATW,WII N A MAX VAXIA'MON OF 71111 III1AU OF TILE PILE FROM'011i POSITION NOTES SIK)WN UN EUI-:PLANS OF NOT MORE'THAN r. 6. MIME PILING MUST PENETRATE STRATA OFFERING 111011 RESISTANCE'H./DRIVING,THE SIIIU(-IURAI. SCALE:AS SHOWN ENGINEER OF RECORD OR SPECIAL INSPECTOR MAY REQUIRE THAT PILES BE SET IN NUE-DRILLED OR SHEET NO. PUNCHED DOLES.171E PILES SHALL REACI I'111114 HNA.PENETRATION BY DRIVING. Page 772 of 1578 LAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& \ SEAWALL REPAIR 0 O t e ,,t, PROJECT �' O MI.6 Beach.Fiwida r y \ B I S C' A V N F. Li A Y MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY 7 544 Lakeview C L Miami Bea EFL v Permit Number f \ 33140 13-0310928-007,00S,007-1 E , \ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: \ OCEAN / \ \ CONSULTING,LLC pSoutheast Disiric't ,° x1208'-6" \ 340 Minorca Avenue.Suite 7 1 w \ cora Gables,Floes 33134 Q y - \ \ 'lel:(305)921-9344 Fu:(305)677-3254 ?r♦O 311 \ \ CONTRACTOR: XiV1.11- \ EXISTING WOOD MOORING \ \ ' PILE TO BE REMOVED. \ \ \ 1 \ \ EXISTING WOOD DOCK, \ \ PROJECT ENGINEER: -....7 \(' PILES,AND ACCESSORIES TO BE REMOVED. \ \�f. DYNAMIC ENGINEERING �i/ \ SOLUTIONS,INC. I \ \'CO 351 S.Cypress Road,Suile 303 .`1, j s,Jj, FVP TO BEDOUBLE EJET SKI \- 7.- \ti Pompano( 4)545-1740 45 l 440FL 33060 ..,' '. _ \ Fax:(934}545-1721 i T 9., I3,�„ \.)� ~' 7",---%.X, i�� 333' 10 '• N \�JG \'�J SEAL/316NA1VllE/DATE r{�rjl%. i yiarrur• r 6 0 �+ • aaaararar o \�. I ■sora■■■■• n94' \ 9,p! \A arararaa■ 4 .\16\i‘%111% .13 SS!!! %�, .., .. ,,.:if EXISTING POST �� i,riiii \ i BOAT UFT TO REMAIN. �� :ririy iri O \: .?- / \\ % V. 1111 \ /160-��/ hr 39' 7° 111,1/ \ \ S. ,/� TING CONCRETE \ \\ Job.Omahas pES3,CA 26129 SEAWALL AND CAP /\ /j� TO REMAIN. ® %//////i \ /�' 5�- ® �q4; //r�� PERMIT DRAWINGS / (� 8" 4k 7 Issue N Issue Date EXISTING MONOLITHIC 10 October 18,2018 CONCRETE SEAWALL TO REMAIN. (6)EXISTING CONCRETE ® EXISTING CON DI'IIONS KING PILES TO REMAIN. \ -544 I.ukrrjeIv C ours- \ a bund Beach.I•!. \ PROJECT:154755 \ EXISTING CONDITIONS \ --- - SCALE:AS SHOWN SHEET NO. Page 773 of 1578 a Hae INCH-I lel I S 2 --_.- - __ - -..-_. . LAZENRY DOCK f / \ MODIFICATION& , R I ti (' A 1' N l'. H \ l �t Q s e N .. SEAWALLPROJECT AIR v \ /41. O, Miami haat.FTaida I 4 CLIENT: \ 0 MN.MATTHEW LAZENBY t / \ y t p SM Lakeview Cl.Mimi BeacI4F'L rr1208'-6"' a Permit Number y 33140 I \ r 13-0311N28-007,008,009-EE ., CONSULTANT: I (3)N!W DOI.PIIIN \ \ OCEAN PILE CLUS'I'EIIS'I'tl \ � CONSULTING,GLC BE INSTALLED. \ \ v southeast-District iv340 Minorca Meow,Suite 7 ' ♦ 4 Coral Gables,Mei&33134 (6)12'DIA.WOOD `�= \ \ 7 rel:13031921-9344 i 30519 I-93M J J FENDER PILES �+ i� Fan:1305)677.3254 . \ \\ y NEW 499 SF l.-SHAPED \ \ ♦0 CY3NTRACTCNt ICONCRETE BEAM EDGE 1 \ =i Y 111 DOCK WITH IPE \ \ HARDWOOD DECKING. \ I p" nG \ \ I \ \ t ! 16 --n • ',.::;:a.----- _ \ \\ PROJECT ENGINEER: 1111111 \i. DYNAMIC ENGINEERING , r \ \.1.:-. ' SOLUTIONS,INC. j r 1 *1� \�' 331 S.Cypress Road,Suite 303 +`I 1� ' ,‘'r, \ .. \'1- Pompano Ik..h,FL 33060 'fel'19541545.1740 (221 NEW CONCRETE BAITER \�!', \ ?as:(vsh s4s-Irl �I PILES SPACED IUD-C.MAX. C - , K \I� \ / SEAL/SIGNATURE!DATE ` NEW 7,000 LI3 r<J \�J J �1 X CAPACITY 000III.E NEW S KEINFORCED \rT \ �, a( ° `\ i ]EI'-SKI LIFT. CONCRETE SEAWALL CAP. \�� \\'! I `� f_ \J. EXISTING E POST \. —r I��=`` \ \i (BOAT LIET TO REMAIN 1I// -- --- � \ \ r I nom,y,. \�� \ 'II EXISTING CONCRETE •-...._ ` \ \ vs. / -! l EXISTING MONULIThIC SEAWALL TO REMAIN 94. ,` si I' CONCRETE.SEAWALT. 3' �` \ ASO O"'ha" TO PE 52733,C'A 268'_9 IK{ih('•is TO REMAIN- EXIS'17NGCUNCHE'I'I:- ` \ ,\ / (' S�b 11, KING PILES TO REMAIN. 41111111110,\ a PERMIT DRAWINGS • / r• 4• D. Issue # Issue Issuer >te .2201 B � I'KOP'...____ CONDITION -±J•I L lkcriew('tot17- \ Iliums/km.h. /.1. I PROJECT:IS 4733 \ \ PROPOSED CONDITION _ _____.. ...._ . SCALE:AS SHOWN • SHEE:r NO. . 1. S-3 _.. P 7740(1579OD unman-ur,r N LAZENBY DOCK NEW REINFORCED NEW 12-x12"P.S. MODIFICATION& CONCRETE SEAWALL CAP. CONCRETE BATTER PILES SEAWALL REPAIR 10'MAX.--- i SPACED IO'O.C.MAX. PROJECT Mian Beach,Florida EXISTING 36"MONOLITHIC 11111 - BIIIIMIIIIIIrilbblIll CLIENT: CONCRETE SEAWALL TO REMAIN. ' MR.MA'1'1'HEW LAZENBY _ 544 Lake%ix.,Ct.Miami Beach•F1. ilii 33140 "v /pi I ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: OCEAN CONSULT AO./1KI 340 Minorca Menne,CoralOabks Florida 53 37 C . _ Td:(305)921.9)44 . • • Fax:OOP 677-3254 {7'i..0.1LC • EXISTING 36" • • MONOLITHIC CONCRE'T'Ef 7 CONTRACTOR: Q SEAWALL To REMAIN. EXISTING SEAWALL CONDITION PROPOSED SEAWALL CONDITIONS 2 DETAIL(TYP.) scALI::)I" I.O" • I SCALES' 1'41" PROJECT ENGINEER: !1' NEW REINFORCED CONCRI:'I'F.SEAWALL CAP DYNAMIC ENGINEERING WITH X CHAMFERED EDGES.USE(4)95 BARS SOLUTIONS,INC. TOP;(2)95 BARS MIDDLE:(4)95 BARS BOTTOM: 351 S.C)pesa Road,Suite 303 VAR. HOOPS AT 12"O.C.3"0.C.OVER ALL PILINGS Pompano Beach,FL 33060 Z'-'I"MAX. 4%err EXTENDING 12"EACH SIDE OF PILINGS. Tel,(954)545-1740 Fn:(954)545.1721 USE CLEAN BACKFILL PER EEC 1 i t i __ __ TOP OF CAP STANDARDS IN AL1.AREAS . T EL,+4.44'NAVI)'4 SEAL/SIUNATURE/DATE BEHIND NEW SEAWALLC'AP;+ •:-: N • • • i 'VAR. EXISTING 36" • • T; } -V"MAX.-' 3'--` MONOLITHIC CONCRETE :c ' . - &I SEAWALL TO REMAIN. DRILL&DOWEI.#5 HOOKS A'1'- • • • 1 * TOP OF CAP 12"0.C.(TYP.)6"MIN 1 EL.I I.88'NAVI) EMBEDMENT IN TO EXISTING. • 11 ,r1 SEAWALL To EXTEND 18".=II—1,1 1%"6n, I� EI..W LINE 0.14NAVD ,L trl�_=1�/ * FI.. 0.141AVD �_` EXISTING TIE BACK Q I / EXISTING TIE BACK 5 John(lmalaer T ?L PE 52733•CA 26629 t ROD TO REMAIN. JO I ROD TO RF-MAIN. µl I I I I I m, MLW LINE - ' PERMIT DRAWINGS F MI.W LINE EL,-2,l. _, 13 ET,-2.06 NAVD i� o• t>r�� c bine 11 Issue Date T f p 01 October 18,20)8 bo �♦ + ♦ EXISTING 36" y ONOLITHIC CONCRETE NEW 12"X12"P.S.CONCRETE av A SEAWALL TO REMAIN. BATTER PILES SPACED 10'0.C. 0 Permit Number y MAX.DRIVEN TOA 25-TON a r MIN.BEARING CAPACITY. PROJECT:15-4755 13-0310928-(X)7,008,1)09-EE -•' -- SEAWALL DETAILS '."'-'"..;':."..-,-:.<:::;:'.-J. -. ■ AND SECTIONS p utheaxt District y SCAIE:AS SHOWN EXISTING SEAWALL SECTIONtlii) + PROPOSED SEAWALL SECTIONtyl SHEET NO. SCALE 3/9" 1'-0" O y SCALE:341" -1'-0- [�_ /� Pape 775 of • p ?ps \J (T� • �a�a• - L.AZENBY DOCK NEW REINFORCED NEW I2"XI2"P.S.CONCRETE BATTER PILES MODIFICATION dl CONCRETE SPACED 10 O.C.MAXI/RIVEN TO A 25-TON SEAWALL REPAIR SEAWALL CAP. MIN.BEARING CAPACITY BETWEEN PROJECT EXISTING KING PILES. Mimi Rech,Florida CLIENT: EXISTING CONCRETE I(Y MAX EXISTINGCON('klil'fi t 5' t � fi MIL MATTHEW LAZENBY KING PILE TO REMAIN. SEAWALL CAP TO . EXISTING CONCRETE REMAIN. 1 544 LFevJm C,Mimi Her hF'L SEAWALL TO REMAIN. I �c , 4 32140 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: r, fc ..:-,.... 1 :4?: ,,,, CONSULTING,LLC OCEAN AtoA 4 JIO Miami Mame,Suite 7 in ?IAAA ?A Am '� !F'54 .. rll 1\/1.c 1 1'1.L\71$ Q• EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING KING • SEAWALL TO REMAIN. PILES TO REMAIN. VP EXISTING SEAWALL CONDITION El) PROPOSED SEAWALL CONDITIO 410 PROJEC1 ENO&NEER.: I DETAIL(TYP.) DETAIL(TYP.) DYNAMIC ENGINEERING S('ALI_:B' l'(r S('AI.E:IP' 1'- SOLUTIONS,INC. 351 S.Cypress Rod.5.4k 303 1' VAR. Pompmo N=ch.F7.330°0 ¢ I. 2'-9"MAX.- —4'-6" Tel:(954)545.1740 I 4)TOP OF CAP Fax:(9541545.1721 • USE CLEAN BACKFILL PER FB( 1 STANDARDS IN ALL AREAS =10.+<,��^ • • • 41 EL.+4.44'NAV U SEAL/SIGNATURE/DATE BEHIND NEW SEAWALL CAP.' - EXISTING CONCRETE ( ?. i; NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE VAR. SEAWALL CAP TO REMAIN. '•:•;'.'J.; -4'.'''""� o • r1 SEAWALL CAP WI'I'IIYC'IIAMFEREU i'- 2'-9"MAX.-{ 3' c • EDGES.USE(4)45 BARS TOP:(2)45 BARS DRILL&DOWEL 45 HOOKS AT . TOP OF CAP MIDDLE;(4)45 BARS BOTTOM:43 HOOPS ► $ 12"U.C.('TYPJ b'MIN �ij I 1 AT 12"O.0 )'0.C.OVER ALL PILINGS F.L.i 1.88 NAVD � ;`;;�```�\` EMBEDMENT IN TO EXISTING %`'�,..• i, EXTENDING 12"EACH SIDE OF PILINGS. Q ////// I'S 411 — SEAWALL TOEX'IENU18. N/N, - \\\/. - .%/`//\\/ ,e( -#.1"./ - 1'-6'�f 1�_(1„ I mir MHW LINE ♦\\\ // v \\/\\\\ , \ \ 4 \ 1'-6" MHW LINE \'\\ • , i/t✓i/i/, c2/n/i EL.+0.14NAVD as>s�r. EL.+0.14 NAVD F �/\ EXISTING TIE BACK J EXISTING TIE BACK 1\\a. � I �n Qn�sor /i4 I'O REMAIN. 0 BEHINI)'I'O REMAIN. I\\ '1 Pe 52733,CA 24529 ' EL -2.06 NAVD F- N. .W LINE EL.-2.06 NAVD ELEL.-2.06 NAVD i--;- PERMIT DRAWINGS W t o a INP♦ Issue# Issue Date ' EXISTING CONCRETE ca 1r� ♦0 SEAWALL AND KING x 6♦ 7 NEWI2"X12"P.S.CONCRETE � October IK,2018 PILE TO REMAIN. , BATTER PILES SPACED 10'O.C. r MAX.DRIVEN 10 A 25-TON MIN. 4 .4 BEARING C'APAC'ITY. 1 A v Permit Number / 1 C PROJECT:15.4755 . 13-0310938-007.(XIK.(X)9-HI: SEAWALL DETAILS I o AND SECTIONS p• Southeast District y ( )( o ,- PROPOSED SEAWALL SECTION(TYP. SHEET O.SHOWN EXISTING SEAWALL SECTION TYP. i fi) SHEET NO. SCALLOP'-I'-O" ? >>' SCALE:)" rA' Pape 776 011576 o -- , O S 5 . --- .. . _- - - — LAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& 9-6" 4Y-4" _9'_4„ — _ V-4"- ■y_q» ELSEAWALL REPAIR -0114 5PROJECT Minni Beach,Florida ti- 1 CLIENT: gr Ir I®1• I�1 _ ►TI t igi MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY • II a s ■ T �a iM Lake,ocn Cl.Mimi Bash,Fl. - _ TEX a• • — e oc' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: '' Z ■■ ■r •.0"�-�---- OCEAN '� .�� x CONSULTING,LLC 340 Minorca Avenue,Suite 7 � . d �•' Cool Gables,Florida 33134 --_IA- •• ��/ TED D. Tel:0057921-9344 i-,1 / , - - Fax.(305)677-3254 CiCONTRAC'T'OR: ri - - PI'4"x4"TIMBER BLOCK ATI'ACIIED NEW 12"x 12"P.S.CONCRETE NEW IPE,BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, I'WIDE (6)NEW CCA J RF..A'IED 12" TO CONCRETE PILE CAP W/(2)1"DIA. PILES DRIVEN 12'MIN.INTO y"x 6",DECKING HOARDS REINFORCED DIA.FENDER PILES DRIVEN WEDGE.AN('ll(Ht5 2}"MIN-EMBED. FIRM MATERIAL OR 25-TON MIN. SECURED WITH(2)S.S.DECK CONCRETE REAM. 12'INTO FIRM MATERIAL A-----l' a 4x4 BLOCKS ARE SAME:LENCi1h1 OF BEAKING CAPACITY.MIN 4" SCREWS AT EA('II STRINGER TOA IS-TON CAPACITY. i ,_- PILE CAP 24"OR 12"LONG, EMBED INTO CAP. ■o =1Y z ♦t,�t r,♦D4 PROJECT ENGINEER: `4 4 DYNAMIC ENGINEERING t ! SOLUTIONS,INC. ATTACH Fr 3"•10'TIMBER W A 351 S.Cypress Road Suite 303 ,�-_- STRINGERS W/(2)Y"ANCHOR 4 Permit Number s Pawn°k Fl.33060 ;f • P BOLTSW/3"MIN.EMBED INTO r Tal:(934)545.170 -0 TO CONC'Klilli BEAM AT 5'O.C. I 13-03 1 0928-007,008,009-11; SEAL/SIGNATURE/DATE p Southeast District •°y I =r - ♦ A NEW 7,000 LB CAPACITY 0 O DOUBLE JET-SKI LIFT.SEE , • ri p lekSPLCiF7('ATIONS ON S-10. NEW CONCRETE NEW T-0"WIDE x I'-10"DEEP �� 11°* [VCR.C'ONCRE-IE PILE CAP 410ATOP NEW CONCRETE DOCK PILES. >•i♦i 9- _K �— -. 1w! F1��4.44LW INAVD IP NT, P41- ATTACH PT 3"x10'TIMBER STRINGERS WITH II John Umalsr (2)X"WA.LAG HOLT WITH 3"MIN.EMBEDPF 32733.CA 26829 INTO 4x4 BUX'KS OR ATTACHE:D'I.O 1 i 1 1,4 '-'---3 -- CONCREIE BEAM WITH W ANCHOR BOLTS. PERMIT DRAWINGS MHW LINE El..-10.14'NAV() issue# lune Date EXISTING01 October 18,2018 r SEAWALL CAP - TO REMAIN :y cT I MLW LINE `� r�I.. ,...i. -- AfJ El..-2.06'NAVD ,i, ..- —' -'.7. 7" --. .- '�"" PROJECT:15-4755 DOCK FRAMING PLAN •*—.. .. 5- DOCK FRAMING PLAN a. s I 1.1 w SHEET NASO.SHOWN 1,117411 "'`" JET-SKI LIFT SECTION(TYP.) SHEET NU. Page 777 of 1576 SCALE v.•=rel , S 6 LAZENBY DOCK NEW CCA I RENTED 12 MODIFICATION& IIA.FENDER PILES DRIVEN SEAWALL REPAIR TO A 15.-TON CAPACITY. PROJECT Mittel B.—L"mid'NEW SEAWALL I'WIDE REINFORCED ATTACH PT 3X IOTIMBER STRINGERI CLIENT: IMPROVEMENT. CONC.BEAM BEYOND W/(2)3/8-DIA.I.AIi BOLT W/3"MIN. lt,I,s R,i AlI ,1 EMBED INTO 4{4 BLOCKS !l l::U(q PI.11(0:1) MR MATTHEW LAZENBY 544 Lake.iew C%,Muni Usa h,FL 4,.. 1 _ .. __—,-•-L y i 73t4D fOP OF D(X'K I ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: <<................ — III..+4A4' aaf OCEAN yJ�: �i 1 CONSULTING,LLC '6'• I'WIDE REINFORCED 340 Minorca Avenue,Suite 7 ,... _ i — —` —1_. CONCRETE BEAM. Cored ClabBa. 73134 Tel:(3051921-9344 �` I -- 4' — -.._8.-4 _ _ __ Pm:(3US)677.3254 -, \ _. _.h MHW LINE CONTRACTOR. +:;• NE:W 24-WIDE".2Y DF.E1 V E[..+0.14'NAVI) REINFORCED Pill.C AP. SEE DETAILS ON S-6. v, MLW LINE EL.-2.06 NAV!) PROJECT ENGINEER: I DYNAMIC ENGINEERING 4 o E ~1 h I• SOLUTIONS,INC. • . •- - • - -~ ^• y,# f O 351 S.Cypress Road,Suit 303 ' } ,} Pompano Beach FL 3.1060 • Ta:(954)545-1740 �� .. .•• ^ b--- �`- Pm:(954)545-1721 s A +1 SEAT./SIONA1URE/DATE 41 Permit Number W TYP.DOCK SECTION ® a r SCALE:1/4' I.4)' ® 13-0310928-0D7,(108,009-EE , w Po Southeast Dislricl y PILE NOTE: . A }'EXPANSION-101N I. coNCRI•I1-CYJMmFSSIVF SIRFN(DTH: STRANDS-USI:FOUR 7/l6"(270K) •O O TOP OF DOCK 3000 PSI 0.DRIYI CI LOW RELAXATION ASTM 416.87 UNCOATED �' P-- _..-I'-6'__ - 7 1 Il +I,M'NAY II SOOO PSI(U DRIVING WARE STANDS TF74SIONEDTO 2.33 KIPS 4,0 ,_.—MINI NE- I SPIRAL 7711(Ii ASIMA-$ II(I1T •0 HARD-DRAWN WIRE I-POINT PICKUP-MAXIMUM L 5V 8 L W L I CMN ,/ 2-POINT PIcKUP•MAXIMUM L-62' Jelin Gusher (2 a+• Lc:WOE PE 52733,CA 26829 SMR(1. [ME 12'('ONCRE7F REAM WR11(4)43MGM PILE J.LTU 111,L' YS MI CONE RFDARANUa3IRMA'SAT 18" ----- PERMIT DRAWINGS O.l'.(TYP.):SUN 2'('I.ECN 0.20 L 040 L I 09 1. 2-POINT PK'KUP Issue$ Issue Date I ('UI I-POINT 4 October 18,2018 S GA1K. 7/16'S1R{N1)5 (.:.:::-:.::•::. lit I , P4'.W24'WII,,22'1JF3:2'PILL l'APRF.INF.(3)46 " n II(KS(%1N'T.101'.(211611(RI CUNT.AOUIR.I:,{l) III -" WIRI!SflRAI. - e6 D.Ut3(Y1M'.BOTTOM,{ND 01 II0o'3(.�r I t11it/ O.C..AI{X ,11 , 1\ NEW 1?',t.MEC{51 QR4l'Nk H:COLE{S I I1111,,,,Ei� \\\Ntn PROJECT:IS-4733 PLAN(EXTF:N SA/11ENF.IIP MIN.INTO PILE . -- CAPTYPI.DRIVEN 12 MIN.INTO FIRM PROPOSED DOCK AIATEKI:IL(4425dON MIN.UE,(RING 1 -_I I'C'H{MFEKI- CAPAC17r.AIN4'FIINEUINTII(•{P. 111N• I �.L 6SP�.'3^ B..SPACING(1YP.) eSP(W 3^ , EDGES I SECTION DOCK-TO-CAP CONNECTION DETAIL iiT7TT SCALE:AS SHOWN _SCALE:Ji.1,1Ytill CONCRETE PILE DETAIL SHEET NO. —.... .Page 778' 75 ---. 1 I 1 s...7 LAZENBY DOCK NEW IPE,BRAZILIAN HARDWOOD, MODIFICATION& %4"x 6",DECKING BOARDS PT 3'x 10"TIMBER PT 4"x 4'P.T.TIMBER BLOCK SEAWALL REPAIR SECURED)WITH(2)S.S.DECK STRINGERS W!(2)3/8"DIA. ATTACHED TO CONCRETE PROJECT SCREWS AT EACH STRINGER. LAG BOLT W/3"MIN.EMBED PILE CAP W/(2)}'WEDGE Mimi Beach,Florida ANCHORS,24"MIN.EMBED. CLIENT: PT 3"x 10"TIMBER STRINGERS I'WIDE REINFORCED MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY WITH(2)3/8"DIA.LAG BOLT CONCRETE BEAM WITH 3"MIN.EMBED 4, 8 #3 HOOPS @ 18"O.C. 344 Lakeview Ci.Miami Beach,EL (4)-#5 TOTAL { (TYP.);MIN 2"CLEAR 33140 I' 2' I' #3 HOOPS @ 8"O.C.MAX t'' #3 HOOPS @18"O.C. �_ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT. (TYP.);MIN 2"CLEAR J "•‘1111 EL.-I4.44'OF DOCK OCEAN :1W 1 III 1`� (3)-#6 BARS CONT.TOP 3 4T I X11, f{�1,r"� CONSULTING,LLC i (2)-#6 BARS CONT.MIDDLE �1�:- - '.. , �` (3)-#6 BARS CONT.BOTTOM �� (4)-#5 TOTAL 340 INi.o,oa Avenue,Suite 7 �� 7 Cad Gifts,Florida 33134 O !,•! �� O .1 si,/u■�■ Tel:(305)921-9344 I IIRUU"" :. / �i(♦",■. ■■I„ (I) U-BAR(TYP.) Fuc:(305)677-3254 CONTRACTOR: LBRIiitei A J (I)U-BAR(TYP.) / (2)12'LAG BOLTS v MHW LINE SF.E I\SET Dlil'AIL h7 PER BLOCK(TYP.) EL.+0.14'NAVI) 2' NEW 12"x 12"P.S.CONCRETE PILES NEW 12"x 12"P.S.CONCRH TE DRIVEN 25-TON MIN.BEARING ) PILES DRIVEN 25-TON MIN. PROJECT ENGINEER CAPACITY.MIN 4"EMBED INTO CAP. BEARING CAPACITY.MIN 4" ML.W LINE DYNAMIC ENGINEERING O S N y EMBED INTI)CAP. EL-2.06'NAVD SOLUTIONS,INC. 1----- i •♦p351 S.Cypress Road,Suite Pompano Be.eh,EL 333060303 '�'♦ TeI:(954)545-1740 Fax:(954)545-1721 �' SEAL(SIGNATURE J DATE .4 ermit Number a r 13-0310928-007,008,009-F.E . ACCESS PIER SECTION S TERMINAL PLATFORM SECTION 4FO c p Sputlleast Dislricl y M SCALE:W—1'-0" SCALE.�/I":,1'-0" < O A O O • y ATTACH 4"x4"BLOCK TO 3"x10" 4'x4"x24"LONG P.T. T ♦ STRINGERS W/X"DIA,LAG TIMBER BLOCK 45 U-BAR(TYP.) 40 '? BOLTS,6"SPACING 3"x10"'TIMBER STRINGERS X,81"XV" (12)-ID HOOPS @ 8'O.C.MAX 18" John Omslaer r•1 PE 52733,CA 26829 (4)#6 BARS CONT.TOP 1111Mn`=;�llWir I—I (2)#6 BARS CONT.MIDDLE \�1I•��1 _ / PERMIT DRAWINGS (4)96 BARS CONT.BOTTOM t • 5' '"�`5' . , 3., *�� 44 . o Issue tt Issue Date 1 ■� ATTACH 4•x4"BLOCK TO 4 I 0October 18,2018 11.1.11-11=11=111.1.11-11=11=1PILE CAP WITH TWO)' --r DIA.WEDGE ANCHORS, MIN.2-12"EMBED,MIN.4" li `7 t2^x t2•P.S. EDGE DISTANCE PI LE CAP .7,„ CONCRt;Ct>PILEPROJECT:15.4753 4 `� PROPOSED DOCK DETAILS SCALE:AS SHOWN PILE CONNECTION CLOSE-UP(904x4 BLOCK DETAIL (14!) U-BAR DETAILg SHEET NO. • SCALE:I•t"-I'-0^ SCALE:)4"--t'-0" SCALE:X"=1'-17' C Q ' Page s 1578 o _ __ __.- LAZENBY DOCK MODIFICATION& '9.4r fit pe _ _eN�•t° — SEAWALL REPAIR PROJECT 4. �; Miami Haack Huai& GOLDEN ENGINEERED ELEVATOR UFT SPECIFICATIONS . CLIENT y . IHS CONS I RUC TION WAS N E M DESK.NED AS A Amos YTIN3 FARCE NEWIST NIG AL „A a SYSTEM WITH CALCLIU IL URAY,TYAND WINO LOADS IN COMPLMNCE WITH THE MR.MATTHEW LAZENBY v Permit Number y .;} %/ FLORIDA,RRDNG CODE 26u,5EG T 1005,AAD 1005 ATC ASCE r•10.SONRAM o / •.�� C) DESIGN LOADS FOR OULUNGS MD OTHER 5 INUSI ISART FONT rIIS FANO rHE WIND 5441.eke„iew Ll,Miami Heach,FL r' K l LOADS ASSOCIATES WITH AN UI TANTE WINO 5P110 w ITS MPH,EXPOSURE.C. 33140 �1' } --'{n) RISK CATEGORY.111,44J LAWN PRESSURE IS A5 PST DYNMIIC ENGINEERING 13-(1310928-007,IXIK,009-E:E 1 +• 11, SOLUTICAS HAS NO CON I MI OF THE www AC WIND.PE RFOWMNCE.OR 1 N . II V O INSTAL LAT ION OF IRIS PRODUCT HESE GENF NIC KARS NkRE ENGIRT RED N ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT: ACCARUMICE WITH AocEv1EDENwIEEw.cIRHC HOES AND TlATAI OVIDRO BY OCEAN p Southeast District y° ii\\ B .1 'HE o ./ARUFA NsdL1K,..LA CONSULTING,LLC b ! I-'' \t\. 1 P[sarcA le61S 340 MIIKNCN AvmtR,Suik 7 � 751 s.cR11...RLv4.suE.AI] L•Urd Gllbles,F1U1i&33134 •11111. , °: _ _ �O y I 1 Pdnrw e.n.FL neo Tel:(305)921-9344 r�� `1 DI51ISTS.1140 in 001646I*, FAN:13051677.3254 ink' �O a; 1 s ��I NEW CONCRETE `\I' A r , CONTRACTOR. �� 1'� DOCK ,\� I Eur.ruuwls NI a �� 4'•la-mr r ;kI —4.--— 1:1 ' t . ExISTINC;4-POST BOAT— . 'I Lin'TO REMAIN fUP(JF UOCK / VII,1,�1� HL,14.44'NAVD 1 �, I / PROJECI'L+NOINEER: n ' 1 • sr/A:iE'.�s�sni° t 1 �� L I w K DYNAMIC ENGINEERING ,I �i I SOLUTIONS,INC. L SEAWALL MOUNTING DETAIL J PILE MOUNTING DEFINE 351 S.Cypress Ros4 Suite 303 INCLINE MOUNT OR VERTICAL MOUNT Paper Back FL 33060 RIPIMM _ .. T41:1954)545-1740 (U]J II !� Fu:(954)515.1721 rl _ X i R - 1-( SEAL SIGNATURE,DATE 1 III y MIIW LINE (A) ® ® tJ (F� ® +) O CK; (U Fl..10.14'NAVU I . CAA, IRNA .ITe ,MS .H tete .7.!1:. I ',RNA ,KW 1 'URAL. AWS 11' :.AL1 M .A.1NI .F11R'I Nr.I...r .:Iv.H•M1• MLW LINE .. .R,.1 I.••11s.e"1 ::' T'I ',.. .TIN'• ri y, `_�-�_-.�- OIL.:• ...�. I ' •` r ' -., . Jllllm Omaha_P—'—' -,.•w• `n'11' 11 PE 52733,CA 26029 ..A...1r, .isF.r-1 )t].K' W ' 1/4........ °^H' x"y I PERMIT DRAWINGS • - Isfue N Issue Date v m:. Q.L.:;', '„' -i 1.�F'» Q October l8,2018 .r lyiil ,11.....1 IN01 mfr 'Il.,,, , + �A Ai 'Ii Ti'.1.:" tq.1Ld ArM1 I., ..•..rs ..-0..•Y VII. '..e,:,. .,.....,,:„.„„ {1 '�. PROJECT:15-4755 4-POST BOAT LIFT SECTION N"`. -•O.iI+1 .Ya'1 .iJ R. LI}Rv. 4-POST BOAT LIFT SECTION SCALE:3/1* 1'-0' 1 "IN:;'„" 1`}»1':V' N.�a�`1r, 4s"^ "' pi Rk «.,... AND JET-SKI BOATL1FI' ..L„PI ..11','Ph 'n' - ” SPECIFICATIONS G6Wen MRnufRc,urnp,Inc.17611 East SraaL NOT Furl Myra.FL 38117 Pub 0810 SCALE:AS SHOWN SHEET NO. Pape 780 of 578 S-9