The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution 2020-31461 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-31461 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH URBAN FORESTRY MASTER PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT A. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach ("City") is an urbanized barrier island that has many unique challenges in the management and evolution of a sustainable urban forest; and WHEREAS, the average life of a tree in the City is estimated to be 8 years due to environmental conditions including high groundwater table, limited space for planting, tree abuse, and improper maintenance; and WHEREAS, the City's first Urban Forestry Master Plan ("UFMP") is a guiding document that provides a plan and management strategy for developing a healthy urban forest while considering future climate change impacts, and WHEREAS, the UFMP provides a framework that will guide future reforestation efforts Citywide, including the implementation of the General Obligation Bond Reforestation Project; and WHEREAS, these reforestation efforts lead to exponential growth of the benefits received by our urban forest through enhanced walkability, improved stormwater management capacities, increased habitat for birds and wildlife, reduced greenhouse gases, and reduced heat island impacts; and WHEREAS, the UFMP presents an assessment of existing resources and sets the goal to increase canopy coverage from 17% to 22% over the next 20 years; and WHEREAS, the UFMP also recommends that in the future the city consider creating a city tree maintenance program to manage and maintain all trees in the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the UFMP provides guidance on managing the gradual transformation of tree species citywide to enhance species diversity to have a more sustainable and resilient urban forest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby adopt the City of Miami Beach Urban Forestry Master Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14 'day of bc1vb4'( ,'2020. ATTEST: 1Y[ Dan Gelb APPRovED AS TO .7a1 21° Z ,rFi FORM & LANGUAGE Rafael E. Granado, it ed Clerk ..... ��':', & FOR EXECUTION • (;q.,, ` q j 3 j .z "s IFICORF{,UF.;t1EU � I��;•}.::`.:,_'�°'= City Attorneyl' " Date Resolutions -R7 G MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: October 14, 2020 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH URBAN FORESTRY MASTER PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT A. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City of Miami Beach's urban forest is comprised of all the trees on both public and private property. A healthy urban forest provides vital environmental, social, economic, and aesthetic benefits, as well as being an essential component in the city's climate adaptation efforts. In July 2018, the City retained Davey Resource Group to complete the city's first Urban Forestry Master Plan (UFMP). A series of public workshops were held in June 2019 to provide an overview of the master planning process and gain insight from the community on the needs, challenges and opportunities related to the city's urban forest. In May 2020, the draft plan was also presented to the Sustainability Committee for their feedback and the Committee commended the approach of the cit 's first UFMP. ANALYSIS The Urban Forestry Master Plan (UFMP) evaluates the existing tree canopy and provides best management practices for growing a healthy urban forest. The UFMP includes a design toolkit that outlines planting palette, design criteria considerations, and three case studies related to sea level rise adaptation. About 51% of our residents reported being not satisfied with the city's tree canopy coverage during our community survey. The UFMP provides an assessment of existing resources and sets the goal to increase canopy coverage from 17% to 22%over the next 20 years. Along with that goal, the plan provides information to support the following desired outcomes provided by residents and city staff: • Increase shade/ornamental trees in the urban forest,while reducing the palm population; • Focus efforts on the preservation and maintenance of existing shade/ornamental trees; • Collaborate and identify opportunities to preserve trees and add shade tree canopy on all city and Florida Department of Transportation projects; • Provide tools and strategies to assist in increasing shade tree canopy cover throughout the City of Miami Beach;and, Page 921 of 1576 • Increase outreach and education. in addition, the plan highlighted that species selection must take into consideration the unique challenges facing Miami Beach including: • Lack of species diversity/over population of palms; • Rising groundwater and saltwater inundation; • Flooding; • Limited growing space; • Pests/disease. The plan also identified opportunities for improving the urban canopy, such as: • Removing irrpervious surfaces/retrofit sites to accommodate trees on public property; • Addressing improper maintenance, unnecessary tree removals and tree abuse within private property and/or within the public rights-of-way(managed by private property); • Enhancing public education on tree planting and care; • Addressing tree canopy coverage distribution across the city; • Prioritizing and accommodating trees in the right-of-away along with utilities, bike lanes, travel lanes and parking; • Addressing proper species on public property suitable for the site and changing climatic conditions; • Obtaining and updating the status of the conditions and risk rating of public trees. The General Obligation Bond program includes $5 million to implement the street tree master plan by planting 5,000 trees citywide to increase canopy cover. The anticipated schedule for the completion of the G.O. Bond funded reforestation projects is 2025. The UFMP is a key tool necessary for the implementation of the G.O. Bond reforestation project and the continued protection and enhancement of the city's urban forest. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the resolution approving the Urban Forestry Master Plan. Applicable Area Citywide Is this a"Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O. to Know" item. pursuant to Bond Funds? City Code Section 2-14? Yes No Legislative Tracking Environment and Sustainability ATTACHMENTS: Description o Urban Forestry Master Plan o Resolution Page 922 of 1576 �i' rte. t* ' ii- 1_4 - . ..,. , ,,ir:..‘ X. y '�` �'r " • y �. i �+a f+ •/. i',,, ,Ii �"' �+ `5 voi,„ „it RISING .. A. -%., . ("" .., ,. , , i• + ill } ' ;ice ` � ir /1 { a y ABovE aik ji ' -.. Fa�1' t r Xyl Y1 r h �! • ♦i '( 1'�, r fir"�li 1 -- .. ••.. _ ° i••:tlxi'l• :4;;C:!.•'''''.:,..1,4.&'4'i. ! ... , „.... - ''' *I.1" • , ,„ • -,,,i- '. , '. 10 14' t A,i c$,�✓ YY r. • r :¢ : _ .44-1 . J MIAMI BEACH J °r ' `• �' 4 ,„ 4 e• ' - i URBAN FORESTRY .. ro p rips.. t er r A ; ' '•..,7 • '. . . 411111.411 •''''' • • 4.1 •• '0'‘• • t AI;t4 .1 1 kMASTER PLAN ` e. ;' 06/17/201 .r til,,� a4 Page 924 of 1576 CITY COMMISSION MAYOR I)an Gelber Micky Steinberg-Group 1 Mark Sanntelian-Group 2 Michael Gongura-Group 3 Steven Menlo-Group 4 Nicky Arriula-Group 5 David Richardson-Group 6 STEERING STAFF MEMBERS • jimmy I..Morales City Manager Susy Torriente Assistant City Manager/Chief Resiliency Officer - Elizabeth Wheaton,AICP,LEFD AP BD-C, Director,Environment&Sustainability Department Omar Leon,ISA,FCIII;FCLMT,I.IAF Certified Inspector,TRAQ Urban Forester CONSULTANTS/DESIGN TEAM DAVEY RESOURCE GROUPP,INC. Kerry Gray Principal Urban Forestry Consultant Will Ayersman,Project Manager,GIS&Remote Sensing Services Beoard Appiah Kubi,Senior Geuspatial Analyst Shirley Vaughn,Business Developer CALVIN,GIORDANO&ASSOCIATES,INC-SA FEBUI UI' Gianno A Feoli,Director Landscape Urbanism and Design Michael Conner,MA,ISA,Senior landscape Architect Dominic Mack,landscape Designer Maria Alonsn,[.anscape Designer This project was made possible through a grant from the Florida Forest Service's Urban and Community Forestry Program and the United States Department of Agriculture(USDA)Forest Service. Page 925 of 1576 . .-.• • .. •' ... • .. , -. .•-1.1 • .. • ...,..T.-':'If,ii . i'; ,. ••-I'nklil,v4..".14::.. 1.- ... ',,:..... ' -• . •-.-. "`1%, .1110:9111111b. **oz. I • .4:':-J..;W14...,. ...,... ..- -,..1.1:411'041111r. •... •..., . ' -• n••.P:•7?-.1"'TA'A.. .„...,..... ....--'•-' • •''...V•-..1.4..;',i..1g.)'i.l. .7 i..t7.11,......,. „, ..... .-..-,,..--•,;74-,:,.. •.. ;• 1••• ,,,., . . -•- ....7•:. •, ..'•-• ,......,-;::•:1•3•,,ril,01.t0,..:...•Adtipil, . . .: . ,. .-•,....v:••61-41,*14, • • . . ,I, , „.:. ,-.•'. ... , ,, . „...,„01.11 4,11 I., •. . , • ".•.r.•;:n,l,. ,,,:e•41.7.:-.....„,,...,........,Ii • • • • — ° • • - •1°:,•*•••91oir...;•••111, •. ii,.,..2.1.11416.AWA . ''...Ph 4-• • ''.-•,'.,--.3 '7-!.'.'4.-•;,.I'•r.'7., • . ,•;•!,„.-0-1::.,,,.,- ,,,,f,,,..„, .,„.•. ••. •. i.,.:.•,,,,„4 „.I., 1 i.....1,..,•, ,. . ,. . . ....,.4 q'4.1,141:. ,Illiii .:•.; „. . . .. ''''''''El44''.0'1110['1!It' ''.' . ^INiiill'itli'r*4 , '' •1/...':;,..rile' t,i ',11) I 49:11;1011i 1 ,6,0s,......rit, ..,,„..,4„.,...,....:., • , '',;..,(•,,.,..,:•5:.,- 40 ',..4.,,,,•.,,,:..,..N.!,....,,, ',..1f..-ek,,:,;,.....: •,.... . .,,..,, , . ,-...1..; ,.rie. y, ,.5:'' ... . :. ,,., .;,...r 4.,,•!r;,...t.t.,3",. 1' Sti./..,:•%:.. , . . IR o,141,1 A i 44,1, . .. :„i.';','*, '' ' •:''.i;hii.)1 *L„i'.-,,'0421, xr- 'hir' •. .. •:',:. ., .: . • • I3.•-': . ' '''":.:'• ts'ilw.-..#.1b1.1..' '''• )..v. 1,1 . ,41...1 1:11 Ili',SF.,, • ' • ••14,0,....111i4 .t.., • ',:i.... - .. .. • .• . . ......,7 ',. • . .,.,..`:•:":;:‘:4,:5.0", 1,.;4?...121:.;,.:.: •Of..,•• . , . . ....- *:. .. . _.I. II 40?'" .••• . . .4,4 ,f ..•..t1WIP.::',":."!..;•..4..r-:.•: • — ,l',,,t.',Ir. •A''' ,,n.., iiill ' ,4,91 '1". - , ,,,., 4 4''''• 4.4 4'''' IP:.'''.lc.*7i''A 1,.,, '.1,41 1 'II 1 il P'. W:0^.'''-0.1. •1 ... -. - - ''' «.• , •-,1 '• 0-•`'.i.e.*4 -''''',.... •--. ... -A •- . • , • , • .., 1 - i0b . A .--41.^ .. , --'•7.1 I , ' tr: ,.."""*, k - . . . 1 1 a ri. 1;11 ..4-1._ - v 1, . w ,„1 , _ ill - , . •:>,.; „..-.......,,,.4..,1---: A-": ... ,.. - , .,,.,..7.*PG . ,..,- 4-.-.--.• : - *Iti .'• .„4_- ,-1 -. •.,,,,....1. -.%,,1. 'VII ..‘ - .,- . •or---: : . . •74",7•, ,,, ...'-•• • .-114Z1 . - - ..• ...r:di2s.,..11-1 1 .n !.. -II• ,-.. ... , _'' .- --- 4.4-...- _ .. . •v• -. : • _ - '',....:,.:.....11 ..., ,„ . • • •i! 1 ho.. - e.,--'110 , -v.-' - • ' ,.., ' . ':.• 1040-'-'°'''' ; ' • _,..., . • - ' ••-'"'°3P-1-4'' _ . ,..,...--.'.. , . 1:151 •tY.---.,,, - •• .. —•-. ... ..- • , '• - ..........10 . L.. . . . . • - 73 ." ... "t't ... • - --• . .. . _.---. - - --4-- , - ..1: -•-•.. . • ' , ...• v -g lil• 'al' 7, -.7- L. ..••• • • Ar. : . - • - - . -_ 4. i .., ... e ..- y. .f, .-, --iv:. '•or•ens . • - - 4-- ' --' r. .. • ..-1.— ..'s •fp•-, - —. ...•M.,,4 1' •.I.,,1 rP I 1„„ - , .•• , flioeirr. 'Th., ' ' P . lowiti,,T-P". .' ' :,!": "1-, . _ ... , ..• . , F •-• ., ,.-n- Ir .gdt,Tr.ii-!..461 ...- . , .; ''" - 4 , --", .."40- ., . .;:it_,-c..., - vi. . ,.. . 't,ir'Tr w • I; ' • " - . . • '', --.•' :':. . ,: ,?-i:: .-- ,s, .. . 'cr --".. -1 .II .‘114u'Egi5"..." : 4 , __,,, , .7--'• - -it' '' • ' .. Silli- • - ...iimr-=...-,-.4",141. ,.. ,,. . - - _ . b-Aggall;kt ' -. '"..: .'' ' .'..114' Mir" , ..F.., 341itTy-...,-4-.--•1'.,.irr ,.. ' .. ' ,4 7 t , 1 - - . • ' _. . \. , ,i. ' .' ...i , ...ill'• ' \ -:..i .:.....1....__ : . ,.. , • --6.. ,. •____4 .... .• II .--. .,,,-ft.. •• - - • -...-' ' 0 i' N _i I, lye _ s ,, ,• • •hP • ""1: • 4.. ' ' 11... 10 l'.• , es- 410P t . -- \., .\\ • lc.. .4° - • , 4.1!4.'" 1 4,..., ,. .0. —. .- alik. \. . . • I II - • . • -, 1 , • , ' - - .. • .f...---.17.--_- ril ' 11 '''' • .. 4,‘, • .'-?,,, III. "' i ' ' " r ' , • . AO • I r - -- . , .'• ' a t'' ‘...:. . ....... •._ -4r,k, kL.4:_,,r .... • 01 -4 r...... .1)474:,j i ol.!....'' ' • . •*tie j.J r O. .10j? -• 7P, - 01. . . , . ,. . 1., • ... i ii) 5j. i • A''' - - ' • 2-- - ',• ,..—4 F...., mil„Moo - .. $ ji ,C ii • 7-7 . ... , • .0. .•- , - ii 4.1 i -. .: .""• . ' Adtllly,i{..c�. �Il4n; 4l e t I � "'r' } • 16.•l'',21ii,•'•I•o:•;,• 1,:•.-,.. I . r 4.. 1,ii� ^�a II I':: I;4, , y 1. „...„4„„„,,„,,..,,, Rlaa ,..i.,,,,„:„..„,„„,„,.....,2„. ..,.....,;, I , .'.i, 9. • . • . . . . . • ..„,,„„, IL' i{il19 deli III I I„,i 4 .• fl" Id';' , t' �illlll II1v; .. �. r',. . I I•r '..)k,.t ,'•v:i s : . �I ..'i l -_ ...,I .:'i '.i� ' theTool-kit: I l Uniqueness of I 9 S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 INTRODUCTION Maintenance Introduction to T eAPPENDICES Planning Prose:ss Conmiunity History Level of Service Analysis Miami Beach Appendix A What Do We Have? Miami Beach Today Tree and Palm Level ol'Service Appendix Ii Challenges and Opportunities Benefits and Services of the Urban Regulations and Policies 67 SELECTING THE RIGHT TREE Appendix C What Do We Want? Forest City Plans An Overview of Considerations for Adequate'free Appendix I) I low Do We Get There? Stormwa ter and Water Quality Communication and Outreach Specie Selection Appendix Ii [low Are We Doing? Carbon Sequestration and Storage Regional Collaboration and Criteria Affecting Adaptability and Resilience Goals Urban Heat Island arid Energy Coordination Design Criteria Considerations • Air Quality Tree Matrices Benefits to Wildlife «d WHAT DO WE WANT? Specie Profiles Aesthetic and Social Benefits Indicators ofa Sustainable Urban Scope and Purpose Forest Report Card 95 TREE PLANTING-AN URBAN STRATEGY Pia nuring Process City Staff and Public Engagement Street-True Predominant Species Plan • I Uglily Visible and High-Profile Corridors 19 WHAT DO WE HAVE? dC HOW DO WE GET THERE? Commercial Corridors Location and Climate Goals I lospitality Corridors Impacts of Climate Change Tree Canopy Case Studies:Adapting City Planting Identities to The Urban Forest Resource - Plan&Manage SLR Urban Tree Canopy and Land Cover Connect&Engage Pine'free Drive-Adapting Meaning Summary La Gorce Island-Adapting for Increased I Environmental Services 1i HOW ARE WE DOING? Saline-Tolerances Tree Canopy by Storm Basin Monitoring and Measuring Results Meridian Ave-Preserving Mature Canopy 'free Canopy Cover Comparison Urban Tree Canopy by Neighborhood 'Free Canopy in Parks,Recreation 115 TACTICS FOR PLANTING TREES Facilities,and Golf Cou ises Urban Tree Zone(UI'!.) Tree Canopy by Land Ilse Soil Volumes Historical Canopy Change Analysis Soil Cells and Pavement Suspension Systems Urban Heat Island Planting Scenario Decision Matrix The Community Urban Forest Situational Urban Tree Plantings Diagrams Resource(Public Trees) Species Diversity Species Vulnerability Size and Age Street Tree Stocking Urban Forest Management • Page 927 of 1516 3 I rs - EXCJTIVE - • t� ': .;, - t. .:? Vis. , ° .. . - ' „t y J` ; . .� ' PLAN VISION +�. s Miami Beach's trees are a defining and valued Itatui a of"the city,recognized for the important contribution they -9t �� . ••' ' t'; provide in mitigating the effects of climate change.They are an integral part of the city's infrastructure that is poo- --•? �` .. planned,managed and planted considering future climatic conditions,adaptation efforLs and changes in Miami ;'G• '' Beach's landscape. • „�" r.r-: . The City of Miami Beach,as a ban•ier island akin!.coast of Florida,is witnessing first-hand the effects ufclimate "( change,sea level rise,saltwater intrusion,flooding,king titles,and extreme storm events. In addressing these .a challenges,the City has become a pioneer in developing, evaluating and implementing innovative climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. While some of these are engineered and constructed(i.e.raising streets), others are focused on using natural systems,like the city's urban tree canopy to mitigate these effects.'frees have -•- > been proven to be one of the most effective tools fin•mitigating the effects of climate change.' t. ' • :w • 3 • '-' . Trees mitigate the effects oiclimate change by pruvidingessential services and benefits to the city.Miami Beach's ` t' I ."� rt7 urban forest: 15i • , 'iv' ''- r . removes ozone from the air helping to reduce atmospheric warming and improving air quality and the f e # �r. Pte, public health effects ohmic pollution. i _,, ••N, ,. • stores carbon and reduces the amount returning to the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. w �-r .4r. • • shades and cools streets/huildings mitigating the urban heat island effect and reducing the use of air ..1� r• -•r T•' �• • Y �� conditioning. • ' . ' • `��. • intercepts and absorbs SIUI'InWalCl' reducing flooding and the amount entering the city's sturnnvater t-'• , �'}I system. s ' P es water quality byfiltering and removing pollutants. gra r improves l Y 6 1 { 1 ita r} .' • provides homes,food and shelter for wildlife. "�'" • beautifies the community. r,r • � .•t • increases real estate values by 7-1 0'%,.° •c • , • positively impacts the overall health of urbirn residents'mud lessens the impacts of urbanization,` p' Ii2� , M c � ci .. A".a''' wiz:, r • 'ago• •0 • .1•:•.1.1.I EMI Ji KV Smnn1nty ' PLANNING PROCESS WHAT DO WE HAVE? — Miami Beach Land Cover The development,organization and structure of the Miami Beach's Miami Beach's urban forest °s NMI'was based on an understanding of what we have,what we is made up of all of the trees, Land`.o « ••' want,how we get there,and how am we doing. This structure, palms,and woody vegetation •Nf7:�^ `"j ': -a a l �u I n a,��,I, termed"adaptive management;'is commonly used for resource growing alungstrerts,swales, r" ,.► INpmBead1.FL. l-'":tw11:,' 4,.....:4,...II 4 r li° �r + : planning and management' and provides a useful conceptual in public pirks and onprivate .. • M`4 .,t,l'•";.'„`f:^,,jlI'” -,1'''1' ,-l'" '-,- it: +',..,1..•• framework for managing a community's urban forest resource. property. When viewed From • , r 1 • .. •. I' qN�i,, . ` ;5.9'".1'k'' above, Miami Beach's tree . • � x canopy covers 17iyo of the .vOu'i , t.'.• g�t':. .••• c,' A.r tyro v ;yll rily'sland" :° ,:. .•.,. t, .: i' �f1c : ;, J .i 4R* s . ,,i�:; The City maintains a tree inventory of over 413,900 public trees 1'•:."; ^ay„..r° r:.^ fif,'1k�'II, y gfil! . WHAT DO WE HAVE, and palms,which includes those growing along streets,in swales ;^� ••; ” "` S'': '.- ' and publicparks and otherpublic lands. The inventoridentified 'u ;•. t c 0 „r 4-.1'A j P y y 5' ^,e ;t o.•t ;,..H, ill' aF�EiIFi iqt .I '"•'G . 302 unique species, including 212 species of shade/flowering 1`-. ;r•,i5.'"."7,;,;;1'''' ' '.:,,;1:4 c k• i ` ,i f• . t , - trees and 90 species of palms. While there is a large number of •ti pq: :•,r X' i DOING? WHAT DO WE WANT? different species growing;on public lands,trees and palms are riot ; ti i,�i...iio ;i;f :"a•<�Tw' ::rv" i r:, rills;;;';' 1.:;;y jy�",f HOW ARE WE DO •.;•6'!', I I„ evenly distributed among the 302 species- [n fact,the top 5 species , rrt S 'i .`' re9 •• present 44%of the total tree population. <• • Y". 'PIA 4;i,'h.�.,'�.;r'.A F. "-I i•A tze. '4w.�'iq�,,q'I'Nj Palau, while an iconic part •I • of Miami Beach's landscape. r'^.Ii. `' •% rl,'•V'l' 11, have moved from being +.rf �� b 4;p • ;� i.`4�., HOW DO WE GET THERE? ,�..}ut an accent plant to a major moo, m. 't wan A q ,,:, componentof the city's urban - 'n •-2. 4.f x^ •C�;. - ,,,, ' '.v' 'i f tp a . '�iIl'�itir;d'i�IP,iµl. unrest A general guideline for �:! T `' ,�,�'' h ?' I�'tt'yV' species diversity. states that 'v til;.- p ' • , ffd f �" no Tamil should make upy IulJl.+Yof,I'iI'e•',.. '? ., ?: p' ,,d.. Weilp� U.*,it., ..,.,�:.,, Y . Y g ', %I. .t,,, c,yl..;�,! town• .-••. ''.;`.:•:.. e. ,. -• ':,.:� .,. .,... �..,.... �...,,,,:,.-., more than 30%uta city's tree 'j-; •�;:..• � e.�'•:••.--1.1... .��!' •_...._ ___.____.,_.-_.-.-.--- —.-.....� ._.._- .. --._ population. Arecoceu. the family of landscape palms,makes up •:,,r '! - p'ullj' rr .rp.r�� I:: , 1 it:iv'•..'sr,o-..p .,.N.h.., •,tn.,...,.q.•. ra, .'-jm,i:. '. regi;'';• �,' -I ^411il ;Ih[iiry',(,y'• aver 5�/,ofthe public tee papulation:and:;of the S top species > li. x i ,.. . within the City's inventor are calms-Thissi significant proportion of Z `+w !•sr'ro ;, tY Y 1 (:, I I k:: 5.!A:r., ?• p..1„o•,.,:,.,1.a .,,�n,:.-..-.,, i.pc,n..„,.,• palms has an impact on the quantity and type of benel its the urban • �','-ii.,.*i `.1 ''.I,.;" ,ry;gy.'ire..r a,� •.',5t-Lim4 II forest can provide. As Table 1 demonstrates,an average sized live r ' •- r...r.• a. -. .-.. r�,.. oak tree provides near) 7 times the annual benefits that an average ' •A 1,.., • sired cahhage/sabal palm provides. ?C....,....4.: 4 `•!.n;!, __ -..r... :• gai-t , 10.01vglr uM„1w, it-,i., ,.�>,, The City of Miami ifeueh is responsible for maintaining trees ` f -- r I, .. ' Bill .,;'•"�� and palms growing in city parks and along a limited number of + ' ike ^.rte' x:g street rights-of tmly/swales, however, the primary maintenance 04 ,„, „- - .,;-„.; „-y responsibility or right-nl'•way/swale trees is the adjacent private 5';l;N 1p..'i ,'' •, ,, ”ij ----- property owner. r� .'�. .,: .... 9Q6` 1 S 1. 5.0t.!,11.3011 Beurh l'rbal:i-'o:ea M.:.:er 11.11:2320 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHALLENGES AND OPPOR1UNn1E3 ;f WHAT DO WE WANT? The following key urban forestry challenges and opportunities were r• i•` i'1 City of Miami Beach stall'and residents were engaged during the planning identified during the planning process and are further addressed in > process to understand the needs,challenges and opportunities they see related detail elsewhere in the report and in the toolbox section • a _i • , to trees and the urban forest. Outreach and engagement occurred through s. public meetings,stakeholder interviews,and one-on-one conversations. ty .. • On most Miami Beach streets the right-of-way Is not large . ien,ye a.,-'.4%,-••rip's`•,. ' " , enough to accommodate trees,utilities,bike lanes,travel lanes, r- ,, " In general residents and City stall'shared the following desired outcomes of the and parking Trees are not always a priority for these spaces. x 'VI . LIFMI'• + * af t >t �y o • Increase shade/ornamental namental trees in the urban torest,while reducing the • Tree species selection must take into consideration the unique fi • t�T r . atm �o relation challenges facing Miami Beach's swan fr Inundation), including lack ofel • _1•'- i ?.x' • 1:ocus efforts on the preservation and maintenance of existing shade/ diversity,rising groundwater(saltwater Inundation),sea level ornamental trees rise,flooding,limited growing space and pests/diseases. • Collaborate and identify oppertunities to preserve trees and add shade tree • Due to these factors less than 50%of the species growing Black olive street tree that has outgrown the space between canopy on City and Florida Department of Transportation projects. on public property are suitable for the site and changing the sidewalk and the curb. • Provide tools and strategies to assist In increasing shade tree canopy cover climatic conditions. throughout the city. "",'1t •_ • lncreuse outreach and education • An overpopulation ofpalms lsimpacting the species diversity l,4� , F and benefits that Miami Beach's urban forest can provide. •� -4,...,! i,ar r 16 • Opportunities exist for tree planting and removing impervious r�iNI� �r r n�=4 GUIDING DOCUMENTS surfaces/retrofitting sites to accommodate trees on City-led • .y I'wo overarching City of Miami Beach documents provided the strategic }- `:i /d guidance for the development of the DFM}':2010 Sustainability Plan and the projects. ,L_ I . �.:•r,,. • T;L j 4; 1.,./4,.. 2019 Miami Beach Strategic Plan-Through the Leu'.of Resilience. • Private property owners are responsible for maintaining trees r. r� in the public rights-of-way,as well as those on private property, . {c 'fit, r Sustainability Plan: leading to improper maintenance,unnecessary tree removals ,'f .; r / Developed in 2010,the Sustainability Plan serves as a guiding document to and cases of tree abuse. ` , FFA •• t Is I. the tail to help itand plan in a sustainable manner that•rim trove s t, „•. r develop' I I 11 • There is limited knowledge on the current condition and risk ` ' ...t t resources,prevent[sJ harm to the natural environment,protcet(sJ human rating of public trees. k health,and benefitisl the social economic and environmental well-being of • There Is a lack of public education/outreach on the benefits of s j community for present and future generations" • shade/ornamental trees and best practices for tree planting • ,. and care. its City of Miami Beach Strategic Plan-Through the Lens of Resilience: Developed in 20]9,this plan combines the City's strategic and resilience plans • Tree canopy cover and the benefits it provides,Is not evenly '. into one document to provide a comprehensive outlook of the city to develop distributed across the city, c _, _ goals,objectives and actions to become a resilient community. An example of a poorly pruned ("hat-racked")tree in Miami Beach 7 Tete I i+>;.xutnV.•NI:emd:t• i''RgB931011i1T8 HOW DO WE GET THERE? PLAN ORGANIZATION ;' , v, ' The inibrntalion,data and input gathered during Clic"What DD We have?" The UItMP is organized into two sections: ' ty , • -. and"What Clio We Want?" phases were used to define he UFMP's vision, . at `.�, goals,targets,recommendations and actions. Section I: State(lithe Urban Forest. 4,0i-- ' -i •�i ` " u r Outlines the current state of Miami Beach's urban forest through analysis J 4 t They support and align with the guiding principles and Naturil Resource of the city's tree inventory and trrb in tree canopy assessmrnt,stakeholder - and Ecosystem Management program area goals,indicators and targets of engagement and review of current policies,plans and operations. It details r a :" +lt ` J the Sustainability Plan;and objectives in the Neighborhood,Environmental the Plan goals,targets,recommendations.and action steps. tel, ' L, { Iafrastructure and Mobility vision areas of the 2019 Strategic Plan. IIII • ,' of Section II; Urban Canopy Toolbox. ^�dilflt 'rhe Plan is organized around three strategic goals which were developed Provides the tools to assist the City of Miami Beach. contractors, and S'•'".. ,,,. , through the lens of climate adaptation and resilience and are based on the developers with implementation of the goals,targets,recommendations components ofasuslainahie urban forest. and action steps in Section I. It includes specific slreetscape typologies, and strategies to increase tree canopy cover,along with recommended tree Tree Canopy(TC): Protect and increase shade tree canopy to maximize species based on site conditions. the environmental,economic,health and climate mitigation services trees provide to Miami Beach. •i Plan&Manage(P&M): Sustainably plan and manage the urban / forest eF� ' •.. ;y;M;`. to help mitigate the effects of clinrite change and support Miami Beach's iiia' ' = f +F' climate adaptation efforts. } Connect & Engage (C&li): Connect, educate, and engage the Miami a " ` 0 . 'd' 1 Beach community and stakeholders about the benefits of trees to support q -: :: Y� implementation orate UPM!'and urban forestay initiatives. Ip Apr .r HOW ARE WE DOING? '," -e '�' The 11FMP provides an overarching framework to guide the City of ( • ri r Miami Beach in the sustainable and strategic preservation,management, I' ' • maintenance and growth of a resilient urban forest. It presents a high•levcl r f.. ='1 ' tio: : review of Miami Brach's urban forest,its benefits,the City's management ( t''- `" ' '• _ ' program,historical context and the unique challenges it Faces. Utilizing • * • i 1 ' • this infarm.uion,the Plan connects the city's vision of the urban fi>rest with ' ,.r, . ;. • a " + M. a i c { t �,, goals and recommendations to achieve it. , • �' + .r ti �„„ ti Anassessnpentofthe Indicators ofaSusmiiiableUrban Forest tobegin the plan �Y� ►r � '.. I frt'1Yr ��5.paji,••,•1%..^".1•1•'-'''""kw,."u development process,established the baseline of where Miami Beach's urban �^ f io`x +M r�!!, `' �; y forest is today.The goals,targets,recommendations and action steps are tied a •, • �' ,e 'i,kill<F"m''t...R;l" r..•••a k •K`.,.'•' to these indicators and are designed to move Miami Beach towards a high- AT It periixmance level and a sustainable urban forest. As the baseline metrics, ' Example of detail from the Urban Canopy Toolbox the indicators can he assessed periodically to measure progress in Plan implementation and to develop an annual Suite of die Urban Forest report to 1 '4. ,,. . share program successes,challenges and opportunities with the community. , . , Page 932 of 1576 NMI:Forcer?1,as::pi..2020 £3 Citynf N11.11111 iie.tal: ,(.nsnums❑AI in.+r.I 1 tton,.,s r, sLSI to£EB e6ecl.— r, .'.•`;y'.y51J,I'' ;,'.,'I91P�•.,L'I•. - . a.:.. "1"'41...4.:4 M., ,• .".t•'........ Ir''.'r F:: . }4.a.•. ::A l [ .., .. '�,'4" y�,,.w•,",y .a,':�, 7>,.a[t SL''aSlAa.1 U>: 'Y • ' =.!.+= A•enuue ue d au UOISCAI Isa.1n tiegin.oalAa I I H (J I 9 1 Zi Eft Mid '4• {•'.�}.:.<"., . �, .:',,,.n'"• a 'c'... ': t -doh lenue[u 513l13eul *' ;,a•; luawa8eue[u lsaq tsa.1o;ueyrn ue luawalduu pus 1dopV :13J9 14,118d i "•, v •:• • '?; sa3lnJasUoueuauuewade3s Ue I t alr:b,C;` ,.:;: �• r, • * ':','°N1...•';''-', ......:.!• .,� f aylo pue I#nowaJ.ia//!1 Jural fIa1F:.cedas salllnllae lenowau •seep atnlau• i o swnutpd`oen aeon epu . ? ! �{ enema S1W 1 - pile'a.J#J'aaueualuleut aaannope..1luo3 of aaunuoD :Lp W>gd amnion Hos tunwlupu pa.uej ad;dopepus gsligelsg too •• .f4#,.,..n ce„ 1, •.i,. aweualulewaa.J1Itauaxlawapue5.15) l ' • :LP"� : waa,: q!''�:r,t .,dry u'[•';' ':'h:L''; I - •a.�,: 'sped emsenuj :`,• `ve.>. ti.r I':•. ` p9- 55.11 to palea!pap:tisa.J.J s)l.ied AID uosaad-E e gstlgelsg:91#11,1'8d put'a8uet{a a4etu1p'asp 15/151 an 21.1T10011 1101:101::,Until,laaeMDEps • • slualulaedap 9ulpnpul'yaeag!MIKjo suoplpuoa ausBugliuBzp atpO Penns +:;•:,:.:,i• :. : ''.. 1 I a NI p - MP' 1:( p i,'^,+1-:,!•'��,��"�:�;'',�.�:`;� �:�ir',.:'[.• ��i• ..;,,.." _ Alp pue sawaealuoa'Ctllpn pueoggnd'a rnlad uaanrloy ubsle11 I„� :.>gy�sa cads a aansue ue' sea Bnokdut uo gaod5uez1 • -y :q:',. [ 'x'" :"'< Play-UI uc se dUTAlas pue saaueulpau 55.11 d1[,3un.toJua Al pazucoow•uou'uope.xodsuen 1Ullpn'alllaanpselJu!I ) alglsuodsa.1 uonlsod Ju/3adsul aa.tl a galyels3 'sli wad sl]afOJd Ala uo Supueid aa.R.loi seppmuoddoApluapl oq ,•J,. ..s .a::.. • - '•r.:Fr : . , apll 1 I Q Mule/sell W 1 tl g fl Nl zflpn:sit 7,1 u m,,;s.: r'.r:.... I..^;,.:..:• :+ ;:> ,..r.,.. l' . L. oo lSE se ue a se saeo ue J a a siJojp I 1 P I He 08L Nl (apetp) 1 1 uonelde ealewl3 u#'tialluOiJd tJlllleld'seu�.1anpo•<doueo,tl[o ue Je7eauSsaaU ddou�lggnduo8us •'....21„;:.1 . • • • • 1',' .1:u#Ape ley/suolleaul u4 uleJxo.Jd Sullueld aa.t1 snao:l:yy 14,17'd toes2otd voptlnaasatd pue aaueualulew aapnoa a dolenea.:H�� ., • ▪ • • 7eady3eapalalduu>:>saulnll3ea3u#uaameuJ Paq gWs.P Sf9eN sf • • pue'.`Iupueld'ale.aa.1l uol.1odaa pue x3#.11 :EN Wild am alaNMdlp atpJoseal#ill suojjaPly guild pue cpeatplo vi;,..F'r 'L'`5 J,^ , • F.;:,",:•• ;G.i arplao+td QJ,$e IIe.pniaa,(douel eau epnpuo)•IEl D.I. • "^�G.gJI�'Jl�il•-'.�' .'t�.ti,[•+'yfi`,`�'- 'r" ' - 3ra IwP.I U/f7 i' J 0/x.71[ ISUOdtia.I aU UL'IIJIUfeIU I "";^i;F ;{° . r ,,:=`•!}''�' '�;:';� 4• El WJ .l 47 Iq._ 55.11 aleA>s/.iee>-Jo-140:J Iie aalsueJ/pue we.1yuld aDueualutew '%stJo atbuane1ano3Adoueu poolfJogg8lalu 55.11 SIC..ewd e dulanap,u sapiunuuddo a.1nldx3 :Zp W>8d er4n1YS1P aglmolest aaeleg1 spoogiogq8lauIcy•sueld uopenlasa>'d $'�6'tyi'�"•t'"9>'?1;•r. '.IS 'r.;°;:"`•,. .. .�a aan c'115 u cul #.1 su ue'peau a3ueualulecu l /8uI veld aae pue slatie Jaut0.'l Moues do awl IZ{F'Sal, -..",t'.: ' colllpuo3'.JalautelpCCupepdnpue lutssasse,iJoluaaulaa.11>f.1ed slgauaglencaepue Iunoon$ulpnpal'spuaft -,y.'�..•i••'1 1'.,:"" '"'',, trelaa.11SSl alepd ueX eollewalsX aano)Adoueoalpuouoda>IpuealenlenaXJpuenb'11,a#.1J,is al,;:, 1 1 is r P 11 p I l P l( S :L f W 8d I .. . • 3OVON3 7103NNO0 30VNVW 8 NV1d AdONVO 33211 SNOI1VGN3WWOD3b ' .'. . , 'Ut>:leludod 5x11 3llgnd au)Jo':/ISZ uegl a.low ou do aye[u pinoys swled'p50?Ail a (7 a tanoa/illoue)Gall MONO/ ml,.•" '%` ,';;,;:I;' _.4: .. 1 .'Q34.Z ci ,pue, 1 %2Z 1N/' - • • • - f Zoz Aq ueld aJUeua/UlewlsaaoJ ue4Jn Jea:S-S elUawaldull I J 30VON3 8 103NNO0 35VNVW 7 NVId AdONVO 33211 si3921Vi re-ri:, *:I.L.IN'y' �:�' ',, ,. ..x • ,. '"t''L•: 'slJCJJa UIflSDdepe -gaeag Idteij^L«I apincud sage} alewlll s,y3eau Iwe1}y 1.toddus pue USuey3 alewtl3 Jo s13IJJa au.) sawas uope$ppudum!p ppe tmeatl'alwouc a geluawuo.gnua :• .J'.f. .. i s 054.111 i'�eue k. ti a ®a.1 aQ aleNgtu dlayoll a.1uJ5q/a wpu ueldrilgew_elsn a az ggJ(dvuBa aal�glet{saS autpueg7 old I. (380)35VON3 '8 1.03NNOD K (W8d)30VNVW'8 NV1d (01)AdONVO 33 a1 ST910J r-'•'-`• • -.-A- '-, •- _ .. ..- -,---.4 ._ 'i-t•ii-', •*-,•_=+_,•-- -Ilk ...,. . -5'-"'-'7. -- '.A.- . _. ._ l'-• — :,;4..,—.--..- g ,,--4: . _ .._ . . . _ 4.,..__., ,,,...„,...._ .._ • ' -;- -• :.;.:1-...-... __ it r.,II! "j" 7 , . -.,,,....-.- ••"--""`"7.71"rrir-'9* w-r----t: . 4 „...'• - -7;e•-. ..._ _ .. •-• p: ..-_--- 4.-7 ..... . .- ": 1---1:- '•.t- e.,-: • -,- " ...;;:l--E-•-"- ' • 4- -4 AVIS . ''....--:-e • ' ' ‘,N,-a‘ P' .T7:.' • AI .. •,-=. .- .--, 1 -7401 *r•St1 -, t.r_.'-;.., --, . ... 1 .it.. -', ."-•J s- ' - .-' - . 1"lii 3; ,'Ver. •-. '-;;;.'",or --;li ) -.:-.•-=•• e % !E. - . ' • - ,' -.-34 Z• --', ''4.• ,.'','t-,'''.: -_ i 7:';'e-" •41.-,.7--1,, . :- 1..%,.: -.-4!,.-; ' .---*-• - . .. ----f?.;;-A"'V;;•",-_,' -'. ......,.,.....,• . . , ..,.,.;---- ....tt---.,---1-----2 ,`gt,:;=.4,4. • ____ - -A -,,,,,,, ,• .-,.. •-,- „lc, . .._ . _ 14: • ••).,g-...,,„.,..,..m. A - . ";•-.'--2-=,!!'-,- ...... — ' - 1,..r':;_a- • ,.,-,--.•1-3._P---+•• - , ••-is,- ,""':....- ,-.•V.-.'',..:- `,1-•,1- ,.,{-. IA' .-• __...„.,..4 .., . .77.•-• ,-," .!.-er =-'•-•'41, •.,,r4; ,'' ,.3.;:', .? --4%,• • ,i'.5:. . :. = ifi<7,,Af,c 1 •:-...el,..r., .• ? - . .., 5.....__'....:(•, I/ ,‘,:Kr.i:ii.= :'.,1.-4'..4.-‘- ''•. r.,-,...;.,.::,:. .' --. ; ,.1_, ,-1::".1.4-1,-;•'-. I :_.:....41f: SEC „... ,._. :: ,. Fi .14 e*s.,-: :1 , . . . . 41z:, - ..::. ''''. •"t • . g ._. _ , .,. . r- STATE 1 ' TH , . _..., ..,....4. 4 , - . ,- - - —-.-4.--1('• --:- .4m- - ._ - . -• - - 1,•,. . i.-= -_, URBAN F • , . .. - .... , • - �1c = - - 3 r. . �.: •r r I • ' tai.: 1- • • ,, -. J COMMUNITY HISTORY, preservation and growth of Miami Beach's urban forest because sr The first known settlers of the Miami Beach area were the research has proven that trees are one(lithe mast effective tools + 'l'equesta Indians who inhabited the area until the mid-I800's. In fur mitigating the effects of climate change. • S �•r"' F +� 1870,Henry and Charles hum bought the island from the federal �• `' government for$0.25 an acre. Originally only 165 acres,the land BENEFITS AND SERVICES OF THE URBAN FOREST j•, �.._ ,.,a,�`a - - was planned to he used to grow and harvest coconut,but when In 2019,the City of Miami Beach commissioned the development of 4 • a the venture failed,the l.um's sold the property.It was eventually the city's first Urban Forest Master Plan(UFMP/I l n)to effectively sold to John S.Collins,who in 1913,with funding from his business use the city's tree canopy as a climate mitigation and adaptation ` y , partner Earl Fisher,constructed a wooden bridge to connect Miami strategy and maximize the services the urban forest provides to ,—d:r V. 1' , Y Beach to the mainland. The conctruction of the bridge led to the the community. • incorporation of Miami Beach in 1915,and a boom in development that lasted through the 1920's. Smeller developments were 'frees and the urban forest are constantly working to mitigate w` • r' • R constructed during the Depression and today those developments the effects of climate change and urbanization while protecting �' + :.r `�'-.,:,- f 6 make up the famous Art Deco District of-South Beach. and enhancing the quality of life in Miami Beach. To provide an • f introduction to the benefits and services trees provide and their Following World War II, the city saw a significant increase in value to Miami Beach.an i-I ree My-free analysis was performed . #` 41 population as veterans settled in the city. Today,at just over 7 on four species commonly found in the area, silver buttonwood • - , '�' square utiles,the'city is a thriving,international travel destination (Cunocarpus erectus van. sericeu), crept-myrtle (Lagerstoentia • .,r+-- .:0. - a that is home to over 91,000 residents. Hospitality, arts and indica), royal poinciana (Delonix regal),and live oak (Queues Aq` , entertainment, retail, professional/scientific/technical services virgin iana). i'Irye isasuite ofpeer-reviewed sat ware applications r• and health care are the lead contributors to the city's economy. developed try the USDA Forest Service to quantify the ecosystem 1 services and benefits that a community's trees provide. ' ! MIAMI BEACH TODAY f i • Today,Miami Beach is a unique and vibrant costal community well '.'hese benefits and services include: known for its beautiful beaches,tree-lined parks and boardwalks, • removing ozone from the air helping to reduce atmospheric t 1 and its world-I:mums Art Deco Historic District.Itis home to over warming. •.- ..i '-`:7.7.1411114::..., _ 91,718 residents and is a popular tourist destination tar millions • improving air quality and the public health effects of air —Tir „} ' sem` �>)1tC- ,k of people each year: The uniqueness of the city lies not only in pollution. _~ its community and culture,hut also in its location. Word Beach • storing carbon and reducing the amount returning to the - �,• R• ® is a barrier island comprised of a mixture of natural and man- atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. made islands that separate the Atlantic Ocean front the Florida • shading and cooling streets/buildings mitigating the urban id •iliagia'41' mainland. As a harrier island it faces unique challenges and is heat island effect. 111111 r witnessing firsthand the effects of climate c•hangc sea level rise, • intercepting and absorbing storniw tier reducing flooding and ., l saltwater mtrusiun,flooding king tides,and extreme storm events. the amount of water entering the city starmwatersystem, iG .• } improving water quality by filtering and removing pollutants. In addressing these challenges and ensuring that Miami Heath is • providing homes,food and shelter lin'wildlile. x;;;;;,,, a dynamic and resilient coastal community,the City Inas become • ireautilyingthe curnrnunity. -- .:s , a pioneer in planning,developing,evaluating anti implementing • increasing real estate values. • 4 innovative climate mitigation and adaptation strategies and • positively impacting the overtill health of urban residents anti • `'•:.a .1. • Mh. solations. One of the solutions the City is pursuing is the lessening the impacts of urbanization. r - C: • .,,dOO/w/roty , 1: cal.ui Mcimi lit-irh age' 1:r0,m r.tmA M.rslvr Pim 2020 The overall value of benefits the four tree species provide to Miami Beach ranges from 517.80 to$87.46 per year according Urban trees reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide(CO2)in two ways: to i-Tree My'I'ree. A description()leach of these benefits is outlined in the following sections. 1. Directly-Through growth arid the sequestration of CO2 as wood and foliar biomass. 2. Ind iI Lily--fly lowering the demand for heating and orconditioning,thereby reducing the emissions associated with sarrpamwrow nrv.nrt► • Polluters _ .tier()'_-._. electric power generation and natural gas consumption. unfits' (Career,.deems weer ttegnsrroendp mdrco) (Deiovinrgfou fdvrrtrs rrp;n;on41 _ roll! �r,.ar toDM - -- Siker Buttonwood , Crapemyrtle Royal Poinciana Dva flak __ Benefits* (ConOr serserectus (1.a eatroemia;ndical • (Daloniire iar erboner0rae!gait 11 pwndflreer 179 pounthlSeer 124 pounds/Yea 983 pmma/rear var.serieeus} g � 9 } {4uercus virgirlianal mom lv vW d idspnmsh0J. a,pnorolree, ;111 g4 m�,/ren 3.39484 wes/reer Diameter(DBH} 6" 8" Ifi" 20" Cure ramrod Rah dr D9()trent/Yen 3S ounces/veer npueee,lyer 759u�Myra. _ Carbon Dioxide(CO2) - ---,—_-�_-- -- -- r.493powNsmer 5,25 ounc miveer Sequestered 73 pounds/year 179 pounds/year 124 pounds/year 983 pounds/Year 66,r/sorer- Carbon dlsodde stored 111 pounds mer 6rei,,e 589 pounds ever 14 wee men.ee _ lan�eu (Absorbed) _ DOWEAwp Wq W"" _ _26 kWh 91 R1M ill KM 111 pounds over S90 pounds wee ' 3.493 pounds over ( 5,877 pounds over Carbon dioxide stored E Swing Velum 5823 _ _ 5389 516)1.___ 518%___ _ lifetime , Irfetlme lifetime _ lifetime Annual WY*vfOwMh 58.3 510.43 529 o1 55554 -*Erased on or,onaless utilizingrhe USDA Forest Sero as'Tree MyTreebenefit}tool pvww.irreeu,ols.orq) -staI�r a�ve•.r�r:r.r r6r plr14 rwr, ..r'0000'rue o00e::•:m l�ww.M1rvtro:,a•., ._. .• In Miami Beach,a royal poinciana(10"llBH)growing along a residential street can absorb(sequester)209 pounds of STORMWATER AND WATER QUALITY atmospheric CO2 per year and over its lifetime store 5,368 pounds,reducing the aniount returning to the atmosphere as Dun ng storm events trees intercept rainfall in their canopy acting as a mini reservoir'. Intercepted rainfall evaporates a GK. from leaf surfaces or slowly soaks into the ground,reducing and slowing stormwater runoff,and lessening the impacts elle City of Miami 8eaeh is working on establishing targets W reduce GH(.emissions;tree planting and prescrvalion of rainfall on barren soils. While underground.tree root growth and decomposition increases water holding capacity should he considered a strategy to help in achieving those targets. and infiltration rates of soils allowing for greater absorption of rail''.Each of these processes greatly reduces the flow and volume of stormwater runoff;reducing flooding and erosion and preventing sediments and pollutants from entering URBAN HEAT ISLAND AND ENERGY waterways. Infiltrating and treating stormwater runoff on site can reduce runoff and pollutant loads by 20 to 60 percent''. An urban heat island occurs,when impervious surfaces,like roads,buildings and sidewalks,in a city train and retain heat causing air temperatures t1 he'hotter than nearby areas that are less built up. According to the Environmental Planting trees in and adjacent to rights-of-wary provides a unique opportunity to increase the effectiveness of grey Protection Agency(EPA).a city with extensive areas of impervious surfaces can be 1-3 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than and green stormwater systems.Existing stormwater management systems are not always adequate to accommodate surrounding areas during the day,and up to 22 degrees Fahrenheit warmer at night". Wilt over ti 1%of die land area runoff;when a system is overtaxed,peak flows can blow manhole covers off the ground,hack up stormwater and cause covered by impervious surfaces in Miami Beach,urban)eat island impacts caul he significant and may include: flooding.Where existing systems are challenged by common stormwater events,planting additional trees is a cost- . • respiratory difficulties(e.g.asthma).heat stroke,and heat-related mortality. According to the Center of Disease effective solution to improve functional capacity.To reduce pressure on existing systems and increase capacity,Miami Control and Prevention heat related illnesses across the United States caused more deaths from 1979-2003 than Beach should consider using trees,to help manage stormwater A royal poinciana(16"diameter at breast height(D131I)) hurricanes,lightning,tornadoes,floods and earthquakes combined1d. growing along a residential street in Miami Beach can intercept an estimated 2,211 gallons of rainfall each year,reducing • increased energy consumption needed for cooling homes and businesses,resulting in higher energy bills; the amount entering the stornnvater system and ultimately the Biscayne Bay. • elevated air pollution and greenhouse gases from plants supplying power to meet the increased energy demands • increased ground level ozone created by chemical reactions of atmospheric gases and compounds with sunlight and Sliver Buttonwood crapemyrtle Royal Polndane Llve Oak heat. Benefits' (Conocarpus erectus ) (quercus virginlano) Shade front trees reduces the amount of radiant energy absorbed and stored by Impervious surfaces,while transpiration var.serieeus) (tagerstroemia indica) (Deionixregio) releases water vapor IniM tree canopies cooling the surrounding area.Through shade and transpiration,trees and other Diameter(11811) 4" 8" 18" 20" vegetation within an urban settling modify the environment and reduce heat island effects. Rainfall Intercepted 125 gallons/year 547 gallons/year 2,221 gallons/year 3,394 gallons/year 'Hosed on on analysis utilizing the USDA Forest Service's i-Tree My7ree benefits tool(www.itreetools.org) A royal poinciana(16"DB II)saves approximately 421 Kilowatt hours(kWh)of electricity that would otherwise be used Mr air conditioning,representing a savings of over S50 per year. CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND STORAGE As sunlight strikes the Earth's surface,it is reflected back into space as infrared radiation(heat).Greenhouse gases(GHG) absorb some of this infrared radiation and trap this heat in the atmosphere,increasing the temperature of the Earth's Sliver Buttonwood Grapemyrtle - Royal Po{ndena Live Oak surface.Many chemi Ca I CO ID pounds in the Faith's atmosphere act as GEBls,including methane(CI M),nitrous oxide(N20), Benefits' (Conocarpuserectus (tagerstroemioindica) (Delonixre im carbon dioxide(CO2),water vapor,and human-made gases/aerosols.As GHGs increase,the amount of energy radiated var,serieeus) 9 7 (Quercus virginiona) back into space is reduced,and more heat is trapped in the atmosphere.An increase in the average temperature of the Diameter(DBH) 4" 8" 16" 20" earth may result in changes in weather,sea levels,and land-use patterns,commonly referred to as climate change.In the Energy Savings(A/C) 30 kWh 26 kWh 92 kWh 113 kWh last ISO years,since large-scale industrialization began,the levels of some GHGs,including CO2,have increased by 25%". Energy Savings $523 $3.89 $16.25 $18.96 Trees absorb atmospheric carbon and reduce 61111s.The carbon-related function of trees is measured in two ways: Value _ __ storage(total stored in tree biomass)and sequestration(the rite of carbon absorbed per year).Urban trees act as a sunk 'Hosed on an analysis utilizing the USDA Forest Service's i-Tree MyTree benefits tool(www.itreetools.ot) of CO2 by storing excess carbon as biomass(e.g.trunk,blanches,leaves,roots)during photosynthesis. The amount of CO2 stored is proportional to the biomass of the tree''. •age• • Ser un t•Stare:A the t rho:i,.:e,t 0 n 13 • AIR QUALITY and open spaces to attract these species. The Florida bonneted bat rousts in crevices and tree cavities and may be Ozone 03 is naturally found in the upper atmosphere •••••-•••••.•••••••••••.:-.--,- •- present in Miami Beach.Regularly planting live oak trees and maintaining the availability of short young oak trees in 't''i the urban forest could potentially provide habitat for the threatened Non da scrub-jay. where it protects Earth front the sun's ultraviolet - -r_Mir.ttP'ii¢ P Y radiation. While it is beneficial in the upper atmosphere, 41,!'�lit ' ''i :+h al ground level 03 is an air pollutant that causes serious - Miami Beach is along migration routes of several temperate songbird species that use the city's trees for shelter and harm to human health. Ground level 03 is formed by a thud during their in ignition.The city has also become home to several birds native to South America,including the chemical reaction between nitrogen oxides(NOx),volatile chestnut-fronted macaw,the scaly-headed parrot,and several species of parakeet.These Sou lh American bird species organic compounds(VOCs)and sunlight;add heat and 03 were imported to Miami[leach as pets and have either escaped or were released into the wild.The ecological impacts formation is exacerbate d.VOCs area class ofcarbon•basetf 4.'• ''••". ;'' "s of these species have not been determined,but as with other non-native inhabitants,there is a risk that these birds. particles emitted from automobile exhaust,lawnmowers, ",,;,,.. .. ;.; )..,,..... which use tree cavitles as nests,may uutcompete native species for this habitat. anti other human activities. The ''2019 American Lung -• ••'• ' • Association State of Air report gave Miami•hide County ' • AESTHETIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS a"C"grade for ozone and noted there were 5 days where . .- •-. The aesthetic and social benefits of trees,while perhaps the roost difficult to measure,may provide some of the ozone levels were"unhealthy for sensitive populations."" 3I - greatest community contributions. 'frees serve an important function in improving air ' ' These contributions include: quality, reducing air pollutants and helping anteliomte ste neer uvar:r„r.in,t'svunrsrrIO:7i1/nnn'tc;MN.v;nude • beautifying the community the public health effects of air pollution. Trees intercept and filter particulate matter(PM 10)from the air,including • increasing shade,privacy and creating sense of place dust,ash,pollen,and smoke. 'they absorb harmful gaseous pollutants like ozone(03),nitrogen dioxide(NO2).and • providing opportunities for recreation and increasing walkahility sulfur dioxide(S02);and reduce 03 formation by shading surfaces and reducing air temperatures. Scientists have • improving imolai and physical health also found that sonic tree species may absorb more volatile organic compounds(VOCs)than previously known'. • reducing violence • increasing property values. A royal poinciana(16"DISI I)in Miami Beach can remove nearly 1 pound of ozone from the air each year. While some tree benefits and services are intangible and/or difficult to quantify (e.g. impacts on physical/ SllverButtoowood Crapernyrde Royal Poinciana Uwe Oak psychological health,crime and violence),studies have provided empinc;rl evidence of their benefits to residents and Benefits' (Conocerpuserectus (tagerstroemiaindica) (Delonixregiai) (Quercus virginiana) theconnnunity."1n" var,serlceus) Diameter Mil 4" 8" 16" 20" _— Ozone removed from0.9 ounces/year 3.5 ounces/year 14 ounces/year 25 ounces/year Research has shown:air •trees promote business by stimulating more frequent and extended shopping,arid a willingness to pay 'Bosed on on analyses utilizing the USDA Forest Service's r•nee MyTree benefits foal(www.irreetoob.org) more for goods and even parking'''. • that a well-landscaped residential yard can increase property values by as much as 10%; BENEFITS TO WILDLIFE -a well-maintained street tree can add 3-15%in value to a home and continue to appreciate in value over Trees provide critical habit fir birds,mammals,reptiles, time".In Miami Beach a well-maintained street tree can increase a home's value by more than$35,0(10!` insects,fish and other aquatic speck's. Their flowers offer " pollinators, like honeybees,a valuable source of pollen and nectar;and their canopies provide food and shelter to 5111 ' 'V "" •- • • -r at variety of wildlife. f _ •'.r 'ikie. • 1"v -.. Many threatened or endangered species are endemic to '`rrv' l ti southFlnridaand require the specialized habitat the region i , • ~ ' ,+4 . provides Several of these threatened and endangered 4 - . • , ' species could potentially inhabit Miami Beiic•Iis urban _ i.,, , { ', h t 4 0,46.T.-• '"'S _ !incest, including, the Miami tiger beetle (Cicindelidia11, !! y' Ouridana , the red-cockaded woodpecker Picotdts r• , • ,— ; �� r , borealis),Florida bonneted bat(Eumopsfloridanus)and ` "•,A7 , ii�r 't' • the Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). The - • •1 - - i Miami tiger beetle and red-cockaded woodpecker prefer .11.ord on:ii,intdian innnn values 1,11.nn.3. r,sa.t40000:51uns ti14-11+i.mrr.1,liN.in.te.a..lu.„,.r.m,r slash pine and longleaf pine,respectively;theCity should Fi'"„'” "'`::"'',V,rr,7u.nnrn,,,,Tur.•v.o.; rh+rm.,rrrdm r7. oni'i.n,n.nwrI'itg:.,n,;,r,ni,.,.Comm..,run luck for opportunities to plant these tree species in parks I•I City of Miariii Beach 1, age• i 0 ifrb:u:FSnr q Mastrr l'iau 252o • .., . r,tA Y.. •` v• _ tr• \ •4 C. +''moi SCOPE AND PURPOSE The purpose of the City of Miami Reach's Urban Forestry of the important contributions private trees make to the ""�•a"°�""° """"•' row rr.•n•isir Master Plan(UFM P/Plan)is to maximize the benefits ores sustainahility of Miami Beach's turban forest, and the T,a+••••.:.' - rlt , ''" o ' i javu.•rvr,o"m provide to the city by creating a suslainahle and strategic overall resilience of the community. _- • —:•-• � _ :� •''' � �, framework to guide the management, maintenance, cal+.it aa_i.o u =,i; growth and preservation of the urban forest through the The UFMP is designed to lie flexible and dynamic allowing 4.. r"•'r-"'NOS P" Wale O"" ..-_.�_.. ''?,',• - lens of climate adaptation and resilience. It focuses on for uu tlentenlahun based on the needs of the urban forest, �_• �� budding a n sillent tree canopy that mitigates the impacts changing city priorities,future climate adaptation efforts, �ss - _O"arror'ro.9' .. r _. .. - ' ofclimatcchange h trioritizin shade trees,selecting salt and availablefunding and resouet'es. S � tolerant species,and setting neighborhood tree canopy ....Tv :."wa•,....®.^` "^ . y 1 ".. cover goals based on available planting locations and PUNNING PROCESS ^ , : • .._T �_. 1'1 �+ innovative technologies. The develop ment,organ ization and structure of the Miami ,,, c�cDnr,..}we_y{$?+moo .__ '-,I ' i,' -• \1 Beach's UFMP is based un an understandingof what we ".,Evq....< �__- — �'•., The UFMP aims to: have,what we want,how we get there,and how are wei...,�.y y..•r •• • • -.�__.. • illustrate the value and climate mitigation benefits of doing. This structure,termed"adaptive management;'is P.a c>~rnr::..._. . ..... ..........-......_.._...._I _ xq r•,c•.enri,., 1 :�:tet-:;�,•; .,.�.,• Miami Beach's Trees and turban forest• commonly used for resource planning and management" -„•.,.,.,.. 3.�= • create a shared vision for the future of Miami Beach's and provides a useful conceptual framework fur managing ..�':r•»^"•' 'E`er • urban forest to inspire the communis in the care, ".•.+...r�.a.- F Ya community's urban forest resource. w,a..o..m,�v. planting and protection of shade trees. w.,...,.a..a<;a,,,,,R:P-+, -. J_. • provide guida nee to improve tree species selection During the planning process the Indicators ofaSustainable IM ...,,-p.. and planting through the utilization of the Urban Urban Forest-'r°,were utilized to look beyond tree data ""�"""',77,;"::::„;•;a- .•.- ......... ... ya., .” 1,,Ee 4 Canopy Toolbox. •:end analysis ("'I'be'Frees") to tdso understand how the .........A. ._......._. ... ,. ._. _ ._.(__.._ • ensure climate change,sea leve rise and impacts of urhan finest is utimaged ("The Management")and the "..,.,..,i•,,"� "^� . saltwater intrusion are considered in urban forest network ufstakeholden that influence and impact it('The -••••••' p e.,lx.vw•rrr+•w•ew•t.n.ao care,planting and maintenance activities. Players"). ' • enhance the health,sustainability,and resilience of as:r,.+:\I,rr.n:;:„,.urr+sra;v:;mf'r:rise rurresi I the turban forest. finch component, "The Trees', "The Players", and "The - • maximize the benefits that the urban forest provides Management'has a set of Indicators that were assessed to the community,residents,visitors and the greater to determine the current sustaitrahiiity of Miami Beach's --":, '"�'" region by prioritizing the planting of shade trees, urban Iin'est and urban forestry program. City staff $ •I•/,/ -. • promote community, stakeholder and regional and the City's LIMP consultants,Davey Resource Group, engagement, involvement, and appreciation of the Inc. (DRG) and Calvin Giordano and Associates (CGA), - .'•-"' urban surest. assessed the city's current level of performance on each • • establish benchmarks and metrics to monitor the Indicator and coupled with analysis of the tree inventory • success of Plan implementation. data and urban tree canopy assessment created a picture •••-- of the current state of Miami Beach's urban forest.The set t .• The UFMP provides goals,targets,recommendations and of indicators used during the assessment were customized 1"t' actions til promote climate resilience,species diversity, to meet the needs of the City of Miami Beach. `ri^ 1 f sustainable canopy cover,and community outreach rind engagement. They apply not only to public trees but f• ' also to those growing on private property,in recognition .,' 4th? it ! " iI r •age• :o smuon i.~late of the llrh:U;forint t' ........,. . ,iY:i..,-- .44. . -' • . t.:2 .3; 1.. %...,..n, . . ...--..-., . '• '''. ,-,` 4 Z ).. •,-' e ‘T!,.....•.4-.L., ,:kiv--••• ., . ..:.-. ::.. .. 11...e,..L 47 .,.., . .... . St5• All - :',,.„',.,-iii.',-. .4-.:•.,.... 4-- •ry .-.,. . _.,......:e. .. . . -_ :, •joy 0.4.,i..--: - . ....; - ... ,• ,:-. . . .'•:•-.irte, 4. . i . , •••.. ..-7-,.• •. t . , p. .: --1, .,.•.,:.,.. ..e . I ‘ , ... ..1!.f..;:•.c*:;•,-it... .•..• I 1. .....,:,..: . ....,.V..4 -, q.:•..4..-'.—..,';':-. • — i. '''Y,1.-.•:•,'4,•qk..-... • • _• '•.11'.:. --..-V.:'' • .• - • -...r. - • .. • .-i . •..:::;;_,., • _ - It, ..,:.,,,, - ' . .,• '- : C4.-:‘,• ."; .....v .. .4 '.7 . Ail . 7 ''-.......".......•.. f,. ,•*;..1,-4 • , Or f - , • ;: , . . . • , .. 1 . .. .. :,,. • ,_, 1 • . . • 1 1 . - . r . - .. •• • , . I 1 • .• • . . . ... . . • • .. ,.... . . . i ..r.• . 7- , • • • . .., . . • . . .-.• . . • . . -• . ... .,, ,-,--.-ezA.;-'• . •7-..; ..,"! 1 .\ . . ..t:". ...,..,... „,.. ••:::',..4;0: ' . . -A . -,-., • : '-•I'::::• •, . ...,:, •:A':•; =.:...i. •• ..,..-....7g:, • :• A,,,,,X35:::p: 4,z• - ° \ \.., • - •--? I-.,::.•.-4--..,,!-•...e. - •K-.4 c • , - . . . ,..-4,/,_ ','• ----A-- -,- ; . . = ' ------5-.:4•_=7. ,--. -- - ,• -‘,.-__. • • 'l '\\IP\S‘•,,. .:.d...-.._.\., .,..\\, ..... .,_ ., • -:','f. '-'- V.,:' ..1.;:if.1-:. -5..TA'', , .....,,• . - _. _ . . "- , ._ ::: • • •:'- ,, .= . . , . 1: .._,,•-•,„„%,:.--.,._ . . ;. •."0-.V,;',-,,:- .... .• 401' . . . .. . ._ . • f_.- --_ • ••'.. • z.. . ..: ,• .--,..., •__- __ '� c _ — —� si3 -T { - - - - F 5 • III ril 44411C11(tatir LOCATION AND CLIMATE Miami Beach is a barrier island located in Miami• and physical properties of native soils. The lack of illilil... Dade County in southeastern Florida. The city a native soil structure,and the location and porous '� measures approximately 7 square miles and is nature of the Miami Limestone bedrock influences a mixture of natural and mart-made islands that the species composition of trees within the city. .i, :; ;i+• •i l,tw t separate the Biscayne Bay to the west and the • ti µ Atlantic Ocean to the east. The climate is considered subtropical,receiving over SO inches of rain on average each year. It is �' - i,.• •�• } Miami Beach sits on a porous bedrock foundationeh:.it n itrired as having warm,wet summers and _. ,- known as the Miami Limestone, which can be mild,dry winters The average high temperature • • r " found at or near the soil surface. Soils within in August is 89 degrees Fahrenheit; and the • the city arc classified as urban hind by the USDA average low temperature in January is 74 degrees • f Natural Resource Conservation Service. These Fahrenheit`s. 1r ., soils are human made having been muddied during development and lacking the structure,profile, r ,.,q _ .. • �, .A qt l ITa1l° .. .-1T ., <-. i-tdY vwF - 1 P I�,�E l�ii�,p�.iz y'7 sonr,,.l.un'mu Avant liEr it tM yl 1o I;uyui%AliiIir,.,rh age'' o Ilrbar.Fo:rstM11,sm•I'Phi rlean • II1. '�"•e. -' 116 IL •• w IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE THE URBAN FOREST RESOURCE • "IllrruNNe The Southeast Florida Climate Change Compact updated their regional Miami Reach's urban(urest is made up of all of the trees,palms,and woody sea level rise projects in 2019 based on data from the National Oceanic vegetation growing along streets,swains,in public parks and on private and Atmospheric Administration,the 1.1S Army Corp of Engineers and the property. A subset of the overall urban Ibrest is the community tree rt ..\ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Sea levels are estimated to resource,which is comprised of the publicly owned trees on city rights-of- 0' IL 4 �, increase:.: way,in parks and on other City-owned properties. p ► ' • • • 8-12 inches by 203(1 To gain a comprehensive understanding of the urban forest and its rule •`' 17-31 inches by 2060 mitigating storntwater runoff,the City of Miami Beach partnered with the 3:3-74 inches by 2100 Green Infrastructure Center(GIC)to conduct an urban fret canopy(tin) 11, assessment. The assessment,completed in 2018,evaluated 2017 aerial t• to Floodingand sea level rise impacts are not only caused h the overland Row imagery front the National Agriculture iculture Imo ery Program NASI to measure • ;••,fit n„, 't',.. .I _ of water: Groundwater easily moves through the porous Miami Limestone the extent of tree canopy and other landcover across the city. Tree canopy 3' bedrock that lies beneath the city allowing salty groundwater to migrate is measured as the layer of leaves,branches and sterns of trees and other to the surface,causing flooding and damage to trees and other vegetation. woody plants that cover the ground when viewed front above, The amount and distribution of leaf surface area is the driving force behind an urban Increasing temperatures and their effect on the urban heat island is another fbrest's ability to produce benefits to the community';as canopy increases, - climate change impact that is putting Miami Beach at risk. According to so do the benefits. Understanding thelocation and extent of tree canopy is 0Bl the National Weather Service,2015 and 2017 tied fur the hottest year on important to developing and implementing sound management strategies, record in Miami;and globally,July 2019 was the hottest month on record, .,e ,� according tothe European UnionsCopernicus ClintateChange Service. The results oflheun:provide aclear picture oftheexteutand distribution of .. li ore canopy within Mi;uni Beach.The data enhances the City's GIS database 1" The !khan Lunt Institute completed a Stormwaler Management and and provides opportunities to analyze the tree canopy in conjunction with Climate Adaptation Review of Miami Beach in 2018 that included resilience other geographic,demographic,and socio-economic data layers. Analysis i _ strategy r t, I Ycity 4,°4- Riih!ot,,r,,,, g9 ecommcndations to address hooding and other issues, The can he performed on a variety ofsc•:des from the whole down to the z;_" - recommendation identified the important rule that trees can play in individual parcel level. This inhumation provides a foundation fur making > mitigating stormwater runoff-and reducing flooding in Miami Beach. informed decisions about management and policies affecting Miami Beach and the urban forest by: The City of Miami Beach is a partner in the Greater Miami&'fhe Beaches A • collaboration with Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami. The • benchmarking the location and extent of tree canopy along with other ;,i `'+r partnership has developed the Resilicnt305 Strategy which provides primary land coven f•.1 actions and strategies to combat regional resilience challenges identified • assessing canopy and landcover changes over time. t in the region.Tree planting has been identified in several plan actions as a • identifying and prioritizing potential planting sites based on City 1 strategy to mitigate the effects of climate change and build a more resilient climate adaptation strategies. region. • detecting opportunities to enhancettailsandsidewalkswithcontiguous • tree canopy. , ' The data,combined with existing best management practices,emerging research and climate adaptation/mitigation strategies can help Miami • Beach identify and assess urban forest opportunities and find a balance between growth and preservation. Uf • • Set non I:,.ucrami.-pram 17.'1.'4 S 0 • 14 • • 'I ..0)...•,•�, '"P.rr .4) .SII' ,�I ' ..•. I 1- : ii, hill, Land Cover -.A. :,}':;i --a Miami Beath,FL }ryr �A.tq ; I T'�9 P rl ��tt • URBAN TREE CANOPY AND LAND COVER SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ' , sr:',o r"skw*r"•' - .-.4101111 . ( 011 i .'i s � 1•, ", The City of Mi.tri Heath's land arca (excluding water) To determine the ecosystem benefits and services that thy urban forest • j-..--•':).. - ,E , nnasu•es approximately 7 suare miles (-4.914 acres). provides to the Miami Heach community,an tTree Canopy and i=free '.7.,- . . Y1' JP :.e.i ^ir.'r'' :'•'174)7:,;;••:-.. R ' ' Davey Resource Group, (DR(;)conductecau analysis ofthe Hydro anal ti1S Wu re conducted utilizing thecity's urban tree canopy . t,:' "�'• .. . ,: 1��i`•" ' ... ipIIl t c' � urban tree canopy assessment and land cover data developed data. i=free.Canopy and i-Tree liydro are components of the USDA 1 • fjrr ". }; by the GIC:;the liillowing inlorniation characterizes existing Forest Service's i=free suite of tools that quantifies the beneltts and •:' .pr .' ,�1�1� II''�i tree canopy land cover in Miami Beach: services trees provide to a community. i=(gree Canopy analysis utilizes 1 y"''''(r '?,ii•, •r1!):-N• . • lJ, 1"'1111 1�,,N i•I,!,l tree canopy data to measure the benelits that trees provide; while t .•yea•. A 4Jth";• • 17'%:(795 acres)al'existing canopy coverage,including Agreelfydroutilizes land cover data tomodel the effects that changes , • 'fi~ ,''.;1¢al. . ,,t"* i' ,Li ll.i!Q'ri'1M;li;I`...,I.,,,,,,#:.,,,,l, n!f1 trees and woody shrubs in tree canopy and impervious surface have on local hydrology. Rased .,',.....„...6.41: ) .r;r;rA , „ ,y,.; :;r ,1St ,4 x. I • 61"'/r.impervuius surfaces,including roads,parking lots, onn�renttree canopyarver,MiamiDeathstrees provide acumulative, 71:..,41. r n :t p ::: and suucuurs(3.IIt1 acres) annual monetar value oF$847,252 a$9.'24 mr ca ita h nwidin g ,•• ...h.,,, d 1 1 ai h,L ''C t •• 'd IY 1 P Y P k Gi�i1p11)hr�ti( ai;• 19%.pervious surfices,including grass and bare soil the following ecosystem benefits to the comma City: '�.• 3°/n of the land area is covered in sand. • r '• A potential of 26.20/u canopy cover is possible if all • Carbon. Secuesterin g over 7,797 tons or carbon and reducing f S ye. '+ii,e,"+.:7;'`al dl '.'11111 , `u"'- �i � Ipossible planting areas (311,617 sites) on public and the amount returning to the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. ' ; ry1) private property are considered suitable lilt planting. Resource Value: $361.370. ri.,:t,:1*,•?4.,,...:.!..:!.....,.:,-,.••,.3 .i. ,.,f ( .= u1V�,••:-....:,,o,„„ `,i,` •p:j' • 79% (620 acres) of tree canopy cover' is on privatey • ! er• \*�' 1 t " )�'_l1 residential property • Storntwater. Intercepting and absorbing 42 million gallons of I'r,"-'c t'�,1,,JIE,:,n., �IIII¢ i�� • The average tree canopy in parks is 28v/1 sturmwatm-and reducing the amount encoring the city's storm M�;,, �,r • - - - ;.N k(.:� � �)I� lI 141 • Miami Beach's tree canopy provides a cumulative annual sewer system. Annual value: $427,141. ':14'444404144::''.' : i 4404 �' ° 1S' ...K`.. �,• ' , value of$1147,252 or 59.24 per capita byprovidingthe • • L" Y'.. •t$'. � F I t y, rif•i u, klf4'5 / ,.'m ::1,74l(i '111, 1�1�11`��5+ imV following ecosystem benel its to the cornmuni[y'=" • Air Pollution. Removing JJ,(1(l0 pounds of ozone,8,440 pounds �t ;a;..;•• `'y��' of nitrogen dioxide,7 pounds of sulfur dioxide,and 3,300 pound •s of carhon monoxide I'rom the atmosphere, helping to reduce ` i� ,r ti :':<'' , d.;r 41 '� • '4.1 atmospheric warming, improving air quality, health mr 1� :t>i 1 r r.,I 1, , 1�llt 1I;t ill II! 1 >'` T��,111�1(,v, .1t1 I t. F h 4 Y public7a i.' c r y it i,ks effects from air pollution.Annual Value: $39,507. g • •* ',c . 1 a»s.M.r ,^��,�.„r-' '1,.• ' pl.rn�l;J..^'11i sr� :Igo µ F�4'1�d§:�: .11'!111:. 11A • Air Quality. Trapping and removing nearly 47,0(10 pounds of iii a. " .~ .y. f lc'' .1 ' r its ' particulate matter from the air and improving air quality and t `, `'bm,.1;„Y: * :F mi„ public health.Annual value:$19,234. .• k I See Appends A fur the methodology used to calculate tree benefits. la 6 p a�1 • y; "''•`'�' ( Pala= -. •4.irlr, , -: y1' w l•• ',1••1,1,'.11 11J P�PtI^JI"'�'�"•rA'iliko ,, Op;:' ' N'•al ::n:mw A • 1 v 1 .,,,,,r,-... ,;-f. �i ,,�; �.. * r z i " i ��I!t' 'it's iptl'�P1u"aj..,rel? r.` , II,G�ry��l�a1' .. :'.t aOh. ■••••.••+ arifv� 4•,..._i . . • ,y'A..y�� "i.• ... � '[!,•F' ..;.'.},r'., .. •.:,4:', fir,.• [a ::uv.:.N11.‘1,11 Ncarh Page 944 of 1576 (chew.'ren•st F1:uter Plan zeal Tree Canopy , 1141 1a` . •, i� �u, 1q1; • ,...._..,t„.,:•.,-;.•:.:y.,.., by Storm Basin tl ,14P l ! , II T i.:,.teir. Miami Beach,FL !.IIS- m It6le ' i ''',111; . ' t,-;d S({ .Mill,,I I �y,;,II' --- ---Te„..,...!;;'.::.-r • e I F � IVVC V I� tr ' rY!p� :. � i Il F� i,�P II; !t.'.. .� —.. W,i.q !... Ir,:,. t4 41 II.I, . "" ;,:. I! �, ?t g, , TREE CANOPY BY STORM BASIN TREE CANOPY COVER COMPARISON i7.4 _ '1. '�'P,'� r 1 iV d itl"NSA. ' _ � � •'irrir:,. ; �'r. �+{; •`�•.,•. An analysis was conducted to measure tree canopy cover Miami Beach's canopy cover is considerably lower than . g.:'+.• r "„'i-':• ta,+ bystorrnbasin(see Tree Canopy byStorm Basin Map).This other cities in Florida and Georgia with Tallahassee, I +� • II I 1 r tot +� �;'�.�%y ' illll!: tl I i��.� 10'00.'°,,,`,::: ;27;,,..7•:..."::::." •- ' �+'�^la 4� 5� ` irdormauun can be used to idemifyareas of the city where Florida having nearly 3.� ones the amount of 1.n I Y r"13 r' ..7.-,...-,,..,-. ° yl l !I:.!,. I' `roµ .. - r , ,,:•. ,.Ib1 191; `I',' " , 1.J. stormwater management systems may be overtaxed or cover as Miami Beach. An urban tree canopy assessment 3 challenged h normal storm events.By cnm ruin these completed in 2016 bythe University of Florida and ,.w.. y.' # ,, 1;1,0. t h��[ K' 4' Y - 1t ' >; t Y 4bgl, pi`- tl4l, el, } w j�t�t II'rye l4 ;meas with canopy cover, tree planting opportunities Florida International University found that canopy cover L. ,_,'. IJl IIQ,rIIii Y. ul k�!';l;I;.r :: • -0 -•” Ie4 11CIV�O;P, '!"3'.yt- - 410,, can be identified that can help reduce pressure on these in Miami-Dade Urban Development Boundary was 19'V.''. '.-• r t{•r r• a : # "+�i_ „ ,-......,...A.:::: existing stormwater systems and increase the ability to Understanding regional canopy cover canopy can provide 3 ,n t, manage sow mwairr in the area. greater context for urban forest planning in Miami ticach. ! Si ' q4 •.:IS''' 711 f 1 �.•I' 111�1 Cid A IIIc P I�w r:, r c ;r'lt•--, (1j1� y.411i4fK itf',!!'i i 1, - 1�N1 Id",1l''—''''!•.!:1,1*:'...,,...." hjlr'yliV aye �ik RVVI II'. a L #Ii°"� I�141,[4g0iild ylt vf. ru � �r.t..,. "�.T;: i”! ,i1A,:li. .. . 0 iytl,y..1ir• to.t 1 +i 3T __ _ ::y{r. :i ili'',' s.liirlti i!e• ft, I I � IIi�a �t 4 Y 1� ,: T n �t4T b Y 0. a .. .I J7�014 ."i,: ' IaYf •Ir J i i,L 'I ty.+.' r 91 11�5.II'il i 'ala .1�� , At;apti; t{l•.3t.'4, fl rLI '�It�^. tl- Wr .III4° �wNay lft'I !II+IjGL, i ' _ gi 0�4{ 9 i C.i .: ,._q, .. o--f-.":••••!, ,i,.; i1 .si moil., _ 9 sI sh4l aIl ✓yj5;1ctiy a i ^ 1,1 . tt ,I • -F )y '- ,4. 1.t":., II }} ft � � '// e•4 • Ci l 41N t> �P1It, • . • -be-t +++ qL , rW• I 4I ! p l ..C Iid :.•rdtilt•, 11 or .,i,...).,i,...),, i3I; I 1,1q$ � � • , se : d 1 •" ,� ; r •a d -M 4 . " : •t �i t1 '1, ••iar•1.!srilhe, il E: iyS aI, I J kr 14 fir3 1'o � lb - ' ''. 1, III _ +.... • ' '!.. . >r ,.: . ..tLi. 4 i • IIIc-1 "'�2'1 YA. "L� .i14.:, falr 1� tl PP. 4 J c' "'."e. • • cit Ona ttl!i ''''...•'!:•...{ •^-t I' 1 III` CANOPY PERCRNT il`,. .t'.Y, il,T.. .1,11,•,.J}l [_D,a,.,•2s* Percent - in rp' Civet a 25 to-351. A .1 ,I I . .i' id ;),u1 11111 a.161. t l :.:1,•••2...T.' �f + w. . �,�,y 1 Itl? h' IIJ.I i '� 4.�0 X17 tick' i•t I- 1.....rc."ft.re.•.r1...u.aw omaT� 1k.I.M;III ,' ., Iti1,11J1ilt 1.t%'APTA'.�t,r''#,:M yr.4 i, n.,?"+.W J!t r. :1:.• 1 r,{I:-tr! ~G icw.r/i.n.wnae7�tamta.ldia.Mem � $� .r. Yectinn t tit.ne ur Uw 1 than nicest -age o 21 Trion Canopy r,..,.,._.•;• . .-T ,_-.,. •.Y. by Nelghbofiood Ir '• `, .. , . . IhI}p` ;I ; re*e Mani Beach.FL i . •. ' raA53 611 ... 1 t* "--, .Mi l ��C7i!'i^ml�h 'ra.....: .00.. •�rlb„.I. ;q r:a,,,,,:.„h.,•."I;� ;:: ;a,: a... ry� I .,.., •„Ate. W URBAN TREE CANOPY BY NEIGHBORHOOD While canopy cover is highest in residential areas,the ' • Across the Illy,single and multi-family residential land amount of canopy rover in each neighborhood is not ldly:.7i�:isl:;':... . . P:•'•:'.� ° :,rIln'=;'!L�d .'+!-,,;ari;i'I';.�,�-': uses make up the largest land use Category covering equal. An analysis of tree canopy by neighborhood _ �'p. i. t. L. t , cap ^I:�,..:,h ru,,:i6vt2,. i+'' n, 78% '1,;,,1i,:' t. „„ .4'40.,,,,l'4 : •; '•,' Z,ir approximatelyoral!theurhan found tree canopy cover ranges from 6%to 28%with an i � s, F:r;,:c tree canopy on these lands,they are a critical component average canopy rover of 1 i°/a. tet .-r+- .ti.,• :':a.�.;;;•;' :.1 P'7.'] ' : T growing Miami Beach's urban finest, Q ” 5* ';.K:t. •: _ Il L, o;.;, •.i,1. a rvg4 :I,• to maintaining and g g `'•ice!.'�:� ,q,,,,4IJ. _ I 1 IC;4� ,• t...:,,,, ,`:X:•y r•iTil _ l till!' 111 !IT. • ` • 'uP ay I .:�.� 1 t • •• ...,• y NEIGHBORHOOD PERCENT CANOPY y:�"'l5;.�n m .ia��11111 if �I'p•w"•:'a1:{' sr't1:11'I1 1'AIR'. ,:iG,I''1;;1"1'0, WEST AVENUE AND BAY ROAD 6% i +y `i'• :`. ,,,ik ,7•'!..,y !:`G� '.,: OCEANFRONT 7% is•• w ..i • s4: ,. '. 'P.'. ?p:. • ••••••-•-0, ,t.4^4,-tr1141` •• ^_' • CITY CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD 7% dti;� `� •. ,. riTl..e.N: 7 r ______l G I I I .�I�;.' ll r�(i t"' SOUTH POINTE 9% ...:.: iii ,_, , ,,,,111111 rlarMYl' ` ' ti a,..t?r FIAMfNGO/LUMMUS 936 9,. ,rl• ;. 'kt- ^ '. �' NORMANDY SHORES 10% N 11 I; ;1Pj;: ,.;, 14% i.,. mmmm-- I"v IBi' ''• '`I fr IIVi"!!'+ NORTH SHORE ..'•]:;:jIlv��' i NORMANDY ISLES 14% .I• . ,:-`r,$�'3�,.��••F•• +': r • Allii P� }1 11111'4'y, . BLSCAYNE POINT 1g% • J, . Y,,A. ill'u I, BAYSHORE 2O% a rt -. .�_• -.d�: .•F+(�q -• jiil NAUTILUS NEIGHBORHOOD 2296 ,, : r.,:.it'�.:•;..:� ':. .:. .IE• .'r"....r.4i�f;..._,uy�;�i,, 1,,esu • SOUTH AND VENETIAN ISLANDS 23% •;!•-•.4;1?; • i i yw ;, w i;.:•••:IP' d,�A STAR/PALM/HIBISCUS 25% :r ,. y0. F �' I1f w LAGORCE 2896 '.+�•>v,;` .'-.:-.',...,,,A,., 7•:1 ��d:J�,!il:1. fi4illi;n:�:;ltpa :n.),.i:,,'iiii,,• � � 07 r4.. 't,` ,1 .r-.•,r'',7i'i1iTlittttl iYr .. .7'• NL' ;; L:ed'::.:-5-I r• .w.�r�R-YNg• • ,,,fl•l+W�^Y .JiTi;b 1111 • , 'Ir�ti • ,'LF '•:•'4 ,.. :.. N r6 1. $,7, • .J•,o' •, YIIJI .;: .,.ti. �, 1� a d v�_r1"1•5. �A•.••• ...• •. .17,f. .•r' ' rte.,,, ,.;.�:•10, ..r..v. ,..., ., ... 1.••,0p� I�, � w • ' ....... •+ T l'Vti. �1�,�,7, ,.a��:i';+I'' .�rigiII�.h�i Ids. L:. P .ww„n /7 kir'"%rfi - c,: _ ,•. s. c'�1°..�rrecan 10 r N ^,fir'. .u"A w.u it•.a i�. ' r....•7r 1I• �q. r 'ori 9'I�u` l l'IO' oillrlr L, : .• �'1.n iYt • .. '-: 1 ., J I', A . • Ci' ll 1 r `I 9 1- r‘• Ffi,.-';,20:7.„.,...... :, I' ;'{•irI r , 1. r , 1 LI rt .1.,' w :, a 1 �A^ ..." • ..y. Awa:M wr..w •wwr i .00.0111 ry ;J40• ..L�tha....-�..� .... �.,y; :�:,^I••f'IZ ':c. iam.:...,....r..�IL�• AMIMz. 22 Lily ii Miami Hoch •age''• Urh.m Porest Master PLIn 11120 Tree Canopy .:r • -.,- .1. .. f''' ':`!1:4"',. ,_".. ; ••-• by Parks 1 .�',; • • • r. a • �,, r. . - Miami Beach, FL "" ry ',..:.4.0 Y•1.. I'17':' t t ¢`�}' fY ;ill!'.'771'..,',;:.: '.,, :}; # '} f:.a M u�C Ip, 4 9 ` .YIC q l�,r''a''td` L�. * • ?." . .'"' . f ' bf r 1 6 g V: 1 li�rr 11 0! ; f t ., 14 �Tn•R t +. �.. . ,• ,,' t>'t A i4 b v,. •. 4 ` 4 't' . • : .'•.:. g i'k'7"r'„' r-.• ' .. r1�' • ... r+--rr r.Itt iRi 1 Ali'rll , W t J p.•",-., I: y. �► f� ;:j7,:"..7 _ .uaasf.rw p 1 ,li,, !"1f i, ate. * :el •• r L . . „P. ,,� • ;.c �r •. 1 t . . n 7+4 4 ar ,. y,'�1.�..Byl t•1+•t, ` u.o.fr 4WD, r"1�a1,p { llu fill 1_.T .7 .T' ,t..... + " ,, -. •;^ J ' 1 ,r' v"r• a Y. t • `'rinG 'fi `M.'t )t' .4L.f.Y.M I a'r {,p A -R f .-mac ti • -• X :!• . .", e�,y :).:114404 4 �I •r+a • -•u�•� �JI II IrJ pI�II'�I'N1 �, •.Fe1,G R .. .. --Jr I.,I I✓pll'1 u • ,p { . �!4 5i., '°i ra, 'ti ,..`� `.// "9,n'�y'pnF• 41: �i llI :' :`I lig i' 4 r ia�`Y .'li i� •• , • + p til• .. .i.,.„10#1,4511.•• IG'IL_I:1ill .--(4-.1-,5,25.;:, .,.u�.dn. - - t'. ,i,:1:,r: y,k:,f�ni„tI#.. lac '�•+f wa.a&. CJ�: TREE CANOPY IN PARKS,RECREATION FACILITIES,AND • } - - .roc/• ryt!s.'4.^- •4 i qIP l' ;'ii GOLF COURSES .' t u �s f0. • ••••;t:',..1 ehfJ4' �s +.: Miami Beach has 41 public park,recr'e.nnm facilities and Miami Beach's largest publicly owned park, reere.ttwn Yy i•> sl. . .7•.:•:-.4.7.: '+#e, .;, • won M;.t: t;?;'yti ''r` a+'�-` ' c golf courses that cover 563 acres.The average canopy facility or golf course is Miami Beach Gulf 1:uwe at 126 • `d;. 1,,.. ' Y XtA' P 1A. ...0111:10-00 U 1 U If•is`"`•' a""'1M,.. •a'-',tlllt Igf , il cover or these areas is 2B/u, Poinciana Park has the acres,with 10 clinopy cover The largest park Islaimi tau .7...!"`"1".% '' � thighest overall tree cover 720/c lid byWashin ton Park at 33 acres with la%i canopy cover. The('it should i-' =1 ',st1F,:..%�".p>'r.. ) , F"t,�'t i'•,:"-.1s,':'°-::9'„ g ( ) g I Y- y ,;a.:';!,•: .wow •-. ..r, rt lC^iip, j;i`�I':'-•' 4i,i ZI • ''' ICI+',,,•. u, .m.:., it l': m G;lhi,'I'ill Park Annex(70%),La Gnrce Park (63%)and Pine'free explore opportunities to increase c:mopycove ron publicly I(4 .III I,:-., 4r ,r i / RI,V�t r,,i wi h:, l �, P�. Park 63°/u. Heachlrout Park and NormandyIsle Park owned parks,u recreation facility rounds and half anuses Pis, lJ ) yg 6 • i.ti 1:—.1 I sea. «... if'''$a:; �• '� o (•” J,Pay' •.1:' ,, Pool had the lower canopy cover both at 1/u. by identifying land that is not programmed fin.activities l4' (:'Tj 4 "' g : Iaro:, '.' .�JP1,,,,o” and planting trees, II ' 1f - ..`�''.,. l- 'o1fmll n •,4 Q IP1 hl'It�d, pili,. °111 'J.• t I '1. _ Cdts 1 Y,I 7, 11 - •,,.-... , 4W.'.:�n a • •.p.Y�rl., ANOPY iP_ RC1iNT R w2". *'• i J)!.�Ii Phar t 5� 'Lt •.d': dors KO ,per tilli'tfk l VAT 14i 11i1 1 .IAtTIr. _ aIn }� II I 1 ••r'' la.fwat jai •.S°•1 II. _ ^l`'�T�II' fp d,��. '`►j .r2 3"y'!�.,dy"�.. ;t;' rvtIwa -Qs.t3� :� 1.i 5 Jli w' jil.40...i Iti r.,',/,*• y.b e ti '' .. °'illllik n J. ` _ y ••r.+r .'�•' "1.„ :1,rv."a.r, 1 �Ir�aitl. , `'. ..*4:_,..,..,1.6.,x. ry .r. r4�w0..1, , Y..wff.t "' rP, all. .6.1.t.1:.'"'T:i4' :'^ .,'.104' � G2il.,".t�;rv,i:,m7u` ro ima w. Sr.:I;mLvat_':,rth1't'rhac!4,.cst Page (oflti/b . • .'1 4- - . ;• "n rii-,..=. t i. : ..56 14, , :I sT yrrxrincztoalDri:144Tra :47 ::I :714 . • .li' .. . 4fr a.:.:P4 444. 5 1: Za5 :474 . 't. 4..7f;5 Dt.\Of I 7: ::5 Pi . St•k5•• ' . , , .. . -. . .. f.i.•17.•:41T.L;AA, -.-: :'a .70. jr •"A- . , 114.1.;el sif A P.4,1 t e 54 ::..5 liDi .. : ..1 " ,`•V31'5.+4410.4.7 r' 'lk . - . 54.1.:.r.r.ri...0/Jai 0 Y. 0 , - t4iF .„ 14 T'''. ra ..-.A. .1. e. :I: :c: ¶1t: ' . .. . . '- , . :7 : . • ''' . ... 141.. . 5.1 Zakt _ • - • .„ .,, •••iar. CRSIZI 4'...at. ;$ ;:: ;,70‘ • - . . 4'161'•.5 L.. la •• - • ri.:siao;1F.• 1 17 .:: 1:.% .. .t. , r.., ; - 1. 4i.' I , Iv , ..q, ...i:p - F•Irstle nal' :7: :3: a:14 , - el ,.., F,...wil•v.5:.;I AI o. L: A) 4 5• :4.4 l• . x ' !It 14 • •• f taus 5: 11.04D:1411," 0 24 ;:; 6:94 -4. r- ' • 1%.:th,i rxx....1:AA. CI: :V. wt. 1 i .. •,,-ffr. -..' - .. L..4 C.COCI.:.?")...=I.CA :'-')4: IZ Z7 In :.F., • : -- . 4 LA C.CfCt Fa. G:,. :::: :PS .4 ., .... . - - N ••., • 4:4 :Di7' , „ 1 . -.10.:` ' 1.1411:17.:70,a)....4:4:).7.-Gie,F•FLI, 4 7; '.:: :1 Fi .. . „ ' • . 1 VA..?4:t:.1245%1:4,4D11.1.-14,1411 :55 :54 ::14 . ' vs;.'.-.4.P.DZ a:f t:; :-7. , • -,V Num grkc.: 41-.0,r C.4.11 :.:4:1 I: ;:ii I I., , T.,..::'4,• :!: :5: :1% . • tiC/F.N.V.;• I 4-I(tAtOrt:Ci. :!..1 *DOI 1% ) cailicg _ AA— +'or i, SJA.V:•s.....nr.:+7,.T r.c.,.;-4 :e4:- .;4.1 cb. __ — liazi.u.v.:.uloars%il.;, %:V : :;14 •• .":.•:"':S Nr.4.1.-:.:717 eV -.1 :0' :1M ptcelri:..01!0rtAl!,04CZ '*: to 2.• 2711 ..... !,.....10.7.A.4.:1 :::, :*1 ;g1... . - tote.mu a-1 :.:... 014 ....•0-- _ TN:'It:.t:••,` t•P: 4:•3• - ..• • Iltr4C.MA'Of 0:2 ::A `nt - tct.1:4.--, r.": :al :1% 44 5::Jr-.5tar..`•PA:. 0 et ::t• :f7C IIIIP,4L, . 5e5Jf•,?"0 NT FAA( 4Q7 1 .1 l'211 , ;4; :M 1:5. 404" •alui.,, ti ,..1. . - 2..liat*I.s..t, tat, 0'2 :12. 2.214 = . 1.11k/k".5.:PAII, 0:! :rt: 3N e . T411.1i/At* o;1 :-:i , _.. .....e.•147CP.5,,,,:i C le ::• 41% wks-14:1011.Alf s..whex a:It :..s sm - •K; 24 :.t.yol htuarni lit a 'age 0 •l 11 ill•b.,,,,,..r‘1,-....t. Plan:020 TREE CANOPY BY LAND USE One way to explore urban tree canopy(and understand its potential)is to look at how it relates to land use and zoning. Zoning is the practice of mapping designated zones to regulate the use,form,design and compatibility of property development to manage and direct development. 'free canopy can vary widely between different zoning classification. The zoning classifications in Miami Reach include residential,recreation/open space,public/religious/schools,parking, 1�' commercial,mixed use and light industrial. Residentially zoned parcels make up the largest proportion of the City's area(3,067 acres,or 62%)and contain 78%of f••r}. the city's tree canopy cover. Light Industrial areas make up the smallest hand use category(31 acres,or<1%)and have only I%of the city's canopy covet: • Land Use Total Acres• Wee Canopy Percent of Total Acres Canopy Cover Residential(Low,Medium&High •- Density 3067 620 79% � Kt Recreation/Open Space 741 110 14% >r I Public/Schools/Religious 249 22 3% Parking 37 2 0.3% Commercial 313 17 2% ,;.,: Lam! Mixed Use 313 6 1% Light Industrial 31 6 1% t:.i 5'r rp I r.�:_'_.drtnl?y I%I •L:ir.Li.:i tJty ■Ri':'i-.:L'cr;l(an••,5)a00. ■T�4 ,)tar i's?n,t:y Re•i•Id€nti.z)IIt1'S-: thr.t 8;").4. I•f g.l l.j ss l li_tt:;ft r ity R: a!a•nlr.ti ;RM 1 alit;R ,1 14 Y I'a''ir i:)r•:cru^t ia1 IAhlis 11_0te uiht 5,,wm is ec.nr Page 949 of I b r of Ow rrn.,r.A"a•at b J Yrrnre,:,i;t'.!V;wr:nr Si Ar a pow!I.it;H:.ie Nauru;r iu1.rr HISTORICAL CANOPY CHANGE ANALYSIS A historical change analysis was performed to compare the ground,which leads to flooding during storm events and '' r' percentage of tree canopy and impervious surface between pour water quality in Biscayne Bay,the Atlantic Ocean.and PI* l•a .,, 1941 ; ; 1941 1941,1969 and 2017 in Miami Beach.The years for analysis local canals and waterways. These surfaces can also create 1 "" iwitie were selected by the City of Miami Beach and were based,in an urban heat island by tripping and retaining heat and 'i 1 1 = • , r, .r - {' makingMiami Beach's dayand nighttime temperatures tit. a. ily , part,un available aerial imagery. f, 1 j'y a ii y houcrthan swntundingcmnmmnitles• . '[ 31.-• 4.: �.: li F Miami Reach's tree canopy has fluctuated over time with '� li a high of 20%in 1941(highest year analyzed)and 14%in Photos A and 13, illustrate how changes in land use have iliii,t. ... ' '' II. 4 1969(lowest). While Miami Beach's urban tree canopy is increased impervious surfaces,impacted canopy cover and _ it , `I, '`�'. • ' trending upward with a 3% increase in canopy between altered available space for trees,in twin small areas in North 7 �. % allb :,...,b ,,. I . 1969 and 2017, the amount of impervious surfaces, Beach and South Beach. yr I 1 7- IIII P.I de� �1�1 _F I like roads, buildings, and sidewalks more than doubled ! is between 1941 g%) (61%). I Mr I) � l 0441 1969 1 CJ' ' T -' 1969. (•2B/; and '1017 Im pervious 4 surfaces repel water and do not allow it to soak into the _ •Li mi. ' Jr j11 '' - sr sa� li• Historical Analysis ,r i�ti:1'i---";t 1'; , • moi:..:• .X •r Tree Canopy& Impervious Surface , �I■_ va _ A.V. a• ;b- f-..t ` I ir. ■ .fit k iiii&+' �� ., iJ � r• �- '�' <. 1 V> fin, CIL ' �} I.• ra 28'x, .'_ _ l?' . _ . . . . A'N. N. -rt i._.-r + 1.i a r 1T 1941 root rt144 +w 2c • 1 i_'00 a01111 '' •`l ty 2017 _ •_. •"- '' 2017. r yt 10 1969J 45t. 4 51% r rtf+ur' t•• r.1 , if' r MIL t- heumwatimmammiumnimemennemin 61% i ••.is • 1 A rriiii.,.3. ,- ' • r.. ill -'i?- ,� l4.--,.:DI'1'-;' • ' ';y, .^� I017 a, 1711-, ' vi, ,r: i •§64% p,t tet( ` a �7•, . ,1 ._! sc;. �e� !/rr,'�t t It 17 10 21:} .r.0 sC- Y.) aL) ?I.: ►l Irapar;lou5l`': I II Ire?(.1.• . 26 cry u!Miami(leach Page 950 of i 576 Urir.nr Forest Master 1'Lur 2020 9/S1.10 LSfiefie,{ I4 '.-{ur,�t;�.,r1n,.,n•rS-]'I.,:,.,y • - .....,*;......;- ,,:i'!e.:.- '''.'' .47-........ -'''''‘ .10?rii,7 '-'(....."i . '7.'71"::rD.IA:...i.."-.4..r..:'..:..: ::::"f:::: -.;,--.1,,:.::,.• — y 'Cti/G .lig.lY••,� � M':� �. • t, �..• ,.j•.r. .4110. - ? . , - ._.. • ..:r4Y•..-....� a b+JM' 4 .. l • • WW1 1 '! Y -•.? ••:3••••••'� .c ;1. „C. _•{ . it , q \tr,. yam, - • 1,14, . - . . '' 1 ';,77- 17 , .911 2111 J 7, ';, ' f Iii lb till---1, - , ,"i ,p, 4, 1. !MI tt ,! - • • • ' • . .r i! �i - ♦ _ r; R .'fes. �_. Land Surface ' , �n 7 IAi,,�tiII�:1,W ,�h�l'' J Temperature •_ ° . :'• ;. , ...:.rE. T. '.+ghli,�6{:�'k`•:.wu �'l. ..III.t�dl k;. is k,"'. g..=. � .W�III Miami Beach.FL .i►�.,.�f'' tr ett ;, ' is 1TM11 f r:,`l: • .r •.k,,;i :, rm.i �1'li `.h "i ( A '� , .v lA ,; & A r411•e ei .n`!N 14''I r 111 I;1�," t ' ,ilik 3' .w ,`. '' • t'' • ''�cl u,I14:1'"IJiri,tv..Jr}I,pl?6vpwi'llt Y ::,14� .,of IIIu y�I�'ipt {,t,, gy a•.. f ,.. 10, 1', r r e ,'� / �.T" } .77th,p�.II;�. i�.1; 5a'+'fin^.v" URBAN HEAT ISLAND { .. �. iW.1; It '•';'1*--.^,,.i41-.:a',ik�,V,11.4 An urban heat island occurs,when impervious surfaces in in red,are suffering the greatest urban heat island impacts, ,.i:`..:`'• : , +''+'a'':,, .!`f;;,,,q•,; a city,like roach,buildings aril sidewalks,tri and retain including: r +• 51y�tI r r g Pg: 4" sT=. et heat causing air temperatures to be hotter than nearby 6�.'a,{+a,. • ( b 't;, 111 i • �u i, iY & p^ Mf �i4 areas that are less built up.According to the Environmental • respiratory dilliculties (e g.asthma),heat stroke,and +'-' •;t x ` "r'"}; t •., • ,. ,;:r. r.,..; lift Protection Agency(EFA),urban areas with extensive areas heat-related mortality According to the Center of 1 • ,s. . ' i..•Z.• ..,M ••. •• • S r ',t` • ,• .: of impervious surfaces cut he 1-3 de rets Fahrenheit Disease Control and Prevention heat )'elated illnesses .I- "-r'•,ii',,c, ":`1 iid�S')Tjl;,fill 1_)1 J. •.d,I' vsfi l it ,� •;il,fi g a a�,,..Cn Ml,.,. Warmer than surrounding areas during the clay,and up to across the United States caused noire deaths from 1979- C..,.. - l^r'�$C. ,?' :•s• .., �1,�"�, 2L degrees Fahrenheit w:u ant r at night 2003 than hurricanes,lightning,tornadoes,floods and i .:: � '; earthquakes combined". •a ,{� . „11.04,1411,!!1• '1 To understand the effects that impervious surfaces and • increased energy consumption needed for cooling )"' �• temperatures has un Miami Beach, an urban heat island' homes and businesses,resulting in higher energy bills; , r : •4 ,i;,;1. :"`'' analysis was conducted. The analysis modeled the surface • elevated air pollution and greenhouse gases from plants ;�y>N,64r" • �I.. i t., ..,.ii • • w:,,;ri get ?;lliir'4;; ibi f'; Y Y , ' tt•m eratmr of Miami Beach during of the cit s hottest supplying owerua meet the increased energy Ilefnaiills r -v' :. . „-�;, � P Y P 6Y :�: .<�r -.°; . . J ,r ', ,:..y..:;7!`'. months.August,identifying:in is of the city where surface :Tr.:••••,"�', ,--, 1^'il'; :- ,. • "r: :.,•, ;F ,,';,,rl 1'.. :y•••j,S;••V •••Z-,••••.k' l:,*i • I I'f tem eratures were hi lie•stand the urban heat island effects Focusing Cit efforts and outreach on tree planting arid :!r"""'• '1'I , �' 1 "'yl 1 f I'r P I t Y a .ar... y . it . ,. ' were the greatest. 'fie Land Surface Temperature map maintenance in areas most impacted by the effects of the t. y . : i� (Figure l:)represents temperature along a color gradient urban heat island can help reduce the negative Impacts tv' oliot: r :{lt,tiartlf'; .' a..' ? IIi:.' ;u-ilr. '• -,-, ,i,j'' where areas in blue are coolest and those in red are hottest. caused by these elevated temperatures. ._ , , gi'Ll!*:-Arig,;; r .., .f A', .,1' e :, -, r r •41 5.,:, While lltecity asawhole isexperie:ncingwarmlemperalures '1�"p' �+� :f A', (j.; �' Ir ,.'A IP. l7y),•h.1iEl.".:'�:.v,a A. ti .vry"'°-.`� • .�rG,..:"C(1'7,,�r. ..h �It�.�;J in Augusl,ateas in North Beach and South Beaeh,shown t •, w"{ 1:;a1�j4:"•'s r' 'r1141c0 ;, .,y 4 ,,. f _ 'L: n:.,r;+v ;k'4": • r • Ilr. 4 f�i • yx �;r I I.. i. lr, .. 1,f I ;•rp.,a, : t' : ,. Jyt t, t •hY' •ill''t:' 1�i.li` I•rl Wll Illi i': ,. IP.741;,1. I ;' • • i1t +� ' .. ...do.T.tii.'�a till• AlI to I .,,,i Q cH tete •V µ ,4'••,t ., ••r !r ..� / r lif a August Fieri Islands i• -• RNsattii. 4 tea ee '•e tom` (K Ql'' • t- • , • ` • , n• om. +.4, I lOw $l ` F • A • r 1(c'CK t o... •-:.---I.,,.�drl*� *`a dii'{ a:1.1'l..:.1 RiT 1,Z.:,.'1,. 5t�, ',, wwe��Oa lla N lAr 4w�•�•fir` L' _ :oyF'�(Ip�':+�t.,,T .:-..:..,1-0..„',./. %, A Ua''I' ' ezem M rA1rr rrn.M r l"!-1*.:4:1*,.+. • ''A''.r„ •1. " .'.4,r,, ._ • ", (",:r..wM W•M7eltbi/l1.14 J r rnlrru r:n[:cnxrLA,vu Mnrn'acx r•i.nrr•r.'r:AlTu:ri Mimi io.A rt +aga• n • 211 CIay.,f Pu,u:❑Bk'.0 l: Uttar.run•>a Aaas:er 114n 2020 THE COMMUNITY URBAN FOREST RESOURCE(PUBLIC TREES) The community urban forest is made up of public trees along •airy 7'`•'y R ,;, -1r.""'$-P ' ' ' • -. . rights-of-,tray/swales, in parks and city facilities. Since trees Q +S,�.4••• % , + ••i ,, r D, ads > Y � �t are relatively long-lived organisms, the community urban l• are t••"i :t. :: 74.-4,7•w + • o . forest often develops into a combination of well:idipted, high h•,'+::•1� Y' n� ;}•�4t•• .w.,,r • • • MuteCr1.«:•, aulr.F'::• performance species mixed with other species that over time •;l• • . •„) :' I J •• ! i have proven to he less desirable and require Iriquent care. As the 'u � •.• : i • .. urban forest evolves, managers must caviar their objectives for • . .•^"", a �' t a ••5 'I,t'•. 'r.. ! ., .. individual tree species based on past performance and emerging . , +. '• . r ' - :• prospects to make the most efficient use of City resources. or - ,t•! • +• ' ' . •� ' ! •. • ,.y'. ,� • 3 •I n tt •d ►•. ... '1'u hatter understand the a,mpositinn of the city's public tree a -��.• w �•• •tu ,• � � • •• • resource, Miami Beach completed a public tree and palm tree • w i i `t•. v•!• i . '�: c • r inventory in 2017- The inventory gathered data on species.size. .• '' -•s t,,,R•;?w • 4 .f •,"•• j ••,,;�f�1 condition,and location of approximately 48,600 trees and paints . a ,•r.,) 4 P f• at*I t'} , ..-• • t• ?• 0 growing along streets, in swales/uu•dian, public parks and golf r' M' t,...d.li `• t• x:. a,. i i• •". T +':. .. . courses and other city properties.The inventory is updated on a • • 5 • ••1• •t 7 '• •+ tet: •'1 • .r 5-year cycle,where 1/5 o1'the street trees are updated eae•h year. y.,+_,�_,,. •,.,. �-I1tj<••"a�•y I •y,Syt;• I +`• 'R..',:t^6.,•m r��Y t'Y-'T :�'�� I 'i . 7. + .•.',p7 7y'4 II.. The inventory data collected during the 2017 inventory provides ..w.:! CO a good basis for understanding the resource, however it lacks v,• -1! a .. -li r.4••�' i" ';, : . �•,' • •t:-r.,: .. :°� critic'I irifoi or it ion on risk i lung to mdi in mdc alifyin6 hi,rids mind M: Its/ i• .; 1.,.. I. • .: r.3 0 4 prioritizing work;maintenance recommendations;and it does nut --.r.f 1 .t ,+ ' F' „`••'• ". _ �w t...m.. include an inventory of North Beach Oceanside Park. • -LS Sc • ,u.at f.:tete of the 1'rbac Forr.t Page 953 at 1576 29 FJfillI?1,II APETIl S CI I•lli'(iSI MIN SPECIES DIVERSITY :•en,b.,tia,l,:• — ill-a1.10III AI:IfSeiidr,ln:6,.. ' pi7,4AF1},1'7A1. In general,public tree population diversity is measured Pvivny ape Pah„ Mg I'Rh'F1AND PA LAIN using the 10-20-30 street tree diversity rule,where public ata ar,o tt,.• 1111. tree populations are comprised of no more than; • 30%of any family(e.g.l'agaruac-Beech family(Oak I Londa th.ncn r.lv IMO MN belongs to this family) Sd/er umvomn.,d • '20%of any genus(e.g.Quercus Oak) T knee.6,inon/:vein IMMO • 10%of any species(e.g.Quercus virgin hula-Live Oak) .. iaPigeon t9ou• Z ` Miami Beach's urban forest is comprised of 302 unique E wasr inrl:rr'ia r.rn 1111110 - species, including 212 species of shade/ornament] c hao•r'ie.',yP(r• tlIMI. trees and 90 species of palms. While there is a large = M.',o,;l•y Ming number of different species growing within the city, ,L ',oh fair,.rain the number of shade/ornamental trees and palms are not evenly distributed among the 302 species. v r",,`I`k In flict.S species reprt'sont44%of the total tree population •,,,,c,,,,,,,. opoomosimmt -seeorangebox inFigure 1). ii,SalP's et ingammewsmo al ibage Pan:: 01=111.111 . To truly understand species diversity in Miami Beach,it is tc•cunur Pah.. IE, important to look at the composition of shade/ornamental 'x'c,l5p-cie,vI.Jp0,1 ■ (canopy)trees versus palms. Palms,while an iconic partto S k!Ir'101'!,masTaraimMtiriiilI (ii .... ..,: ••.- ... ,llr'!)lt;l.Sf ref:'f:IJYIN.N1A�t111154(11 of Miami Beach's landscape, have moved from being an accent plant to a major cumponent of the city's urban :'so.110l ental Palenatior 0115'r1li 10'I.S'';'milia tris:, !SL's 011'1*hIll F AI I.1'URlf.511A10 forest. Arecaceae,the family of landscape poi ns,makes up /15040/Nla I.rffull AN)011.05 over 55%of the public tree population,lar exceeding the r 1 30%guideline;and 3 of the 5 top species within the citySl+odoTroe Palen i inamiBearh % ltRule are palms(coconut palm,cabbage palm and royal palm). Gabai,+e,'Sabo Palm : I Live 041;.:,.rrcul,ui}rwpul I 16% i S Maps I and II detail the distribution of palm and shade/ :Sabo' ornamental trees in the city.The large number of pilins1 not only impacts the diversity of species in the city's public I C+'rbon O+odd.,(Co%i Sorquotlfetod fin paJnds,t oar 9d pc r4l''rvar tree population,making it vulnerable to diseases and pests; iAbscrbrd: 14fi it also effects the quantity and type of benefits the urban forest can provide. As Table 3 demonstrates,a maturing • ia% Pa',IaI Ir:e'voted S'.X:galbn:Jvtar 'al i;allzn:,t wr live oak tree provides nearly 7 times the annual benefits 'rya loft that a maturing cabbage/sahal palm provides. • . I a OhcraCwmv+rdltom.All 23.57ounc*►./y w 237ouncrsJyr' A barge diversity of true and p;in species is critical to the c e resilience and sustainability of Miami Beach's urban Forest. Carbon dloode:toxo-: :•.624 pauod:oar^Vet,-•e rC•Ci :, co.ndt oar-Vot'r-,o I a 6x The unique challenges that Miami Beach's urban forest faces,including,risi ng grou ndwate r[saltwater inundation), • sX sea level rise, flooding, increasing temperatures, limited ' litnryllid kndt{iawfits $1560 $7.78 growing space for trees in the right-of-way,and pests(see x% Species Vulnerability)need tnheconsidered when se•Iccti:I .fded�•„aC yet.nr,r:r. :net kq,e+Ctt rr�e'srrrreM%'ries toriel[ca'-WON,trto:t t0 , , species,to ensure that the right tree is planted in the right Walnut Palm Cabbage Palm Royal Paint Sia(.rape Live oak location to maximize its growth,longevity and benefits. l A TAM 3. /limit e.mMf,lm•Shwdw T,wr s..•/,.s frim 'age•-••0 • 30 City nl Miami Heti h ' Urn For,a M,sooer flare Sean I ,-* .:-7.--.;*''.,.:::-7,...-7.-.7,1777;";"•:'.• .......... --•-- s+r: fli..414 .0111:::',....•-:77.,'''''''. .-.7i 1, t. • -. • .. . /. ZT.'. :. • • .. .' ' . ........4%;ri"" '..1:';.'----.•--- .:,, re:: e..... ' .'..---.:.,e. 40,10 ,,04.6....:_..!. . ,Id.-• .. ... .r, , " _ . ;11'; .--..--:'I,- , ' 1•_ItZ ii_..r'--'g ,—..; ,•ilitli' • I . .,-. ....;-•,,e!.. '.. -. .,-• 1 ! 10..."- 7- . • ilif - ::.... ' , . ,..' .....;:-.;:t ..:• ' •.‘.(t , '.'-t.d.,•.L.i.11 . : •.• . . i• -411 r-• - •' • ' +.- , ,....-._...-,;•.....,'-...•,."4. ... i 4',.....,•:;:.,,,, ,•-•) _,.1 if • _ ,....j....1-.-,•••::.-.....•.. .,-,fijz ., ,,;1 i• -7••••1::.;••.!•::••,:0-•,..1,i.").• ''- ,i fr•'-:'.... .....4,:.-'.;P:'.,....,;;;EY'.'"- '. '• 8 . . .... .. .. . ....';';'.'%':?..-!''.•''''•'' ..- ', •''' ••••12.-.1 . . .1 . /..!..•;.""•,r'1•••:tak$1.1-. ;,!...,.... ...,. . e!......:..s.,....A3,....:-.i..4.:.........;.....--,„:‘ . . ..!g!'..:-.-.;.'•'.••=''' ;. ...,-,.......!......-1,.Z...•!"4,.ilt,i.,,„,,i, . :•.........1,...,•;4'....!... '.. ..,,'[.... ..2'..tig'! .: : ... •'''.'..?1,:',..f.'..75.!PWOMAklil:cl'i:::' ,.,,..`'' .,c • f..,.,-. ...-,•....,',......‘"....,-.:,..;.t......,...... o'.. . ,.,„... ..f.,:•,.....7...,... ,:...:...,,,;....., t . . .. . . . ,. ._. . .. ,(.:..;•-•:..A5A-',34';..''.?;?..4:'N'• . -NO/ ''' ....'.':'•.:..!';',:•;:!..:''t:SJ:-:;.'41!'. 'PI • ' ..'' 1. •'1 ' ' .......:....:‘-•;,..,,,•;,,tr...-irt.tr;'Ir.P. i '6 • •,:., ......-1,.,, 4, i ., '.":'''' .• ....•'''.:*-'....4 ., Ami....4"' - Jii ''S 1 • . 1. r .-• -•:,.. • A.:,•.•-'-'4'4in. ...:7.:iii.ii::::„-...:iri•1111P .:iii.iii,1,-.i, ..-... .1,4...„•,.:•,H...,:;•, .,.. Ilr ..fis• ir'. . ii: I„ .; • ..,.....,:t:.4i/ ^, / . .,Y". 'T:r ''" ,, i.., 1i,r,"...0!1'MZLIIITall . .01.-.. .!. ..!;....'''',;''.1.'Zif";r4, -1 ,e : ',. .".......-..•'•, . i ''' 1.:'• Ill ....?;..-1; " i f.c., 4!_1. C '. '01 " . •.• •'.:.. '....1`.,:•': • .4.$..:.:...;VI.',2..p41.:!•••:V'... iir 2' . I .. .........,.....?.;,...........".!..., ....44,.',..... 1 Alt ▪ ;r;1410. -... ' -O.."' !- " :"'"• iV,'....4.,/,' • - to.Z ',..,...1 t".1".o;'.7'....",:: i i' • -Mil' :41" ,r •t n .... •..., ..... lile,1.0. 2. ' •P/.--,''P •:,.......A.',,r ••( ,•. :.• ;:::...,IH. .,,,,,,.. ,,•,,,I ar" .1 &'OW •' ' - 1. '',4 t',.:.'...'"1:'!' iii 11111 11 i iJ . %,=1.- , 1 :.'.-..0'-,46.'" :' !II111101/1/ . .-,:;•:-....I 4....,,.......';,34-I.V.i.i. =;" ; .'1,F ut.17.!", • -.. •!'!:!:' ! • • l'.., ' ..____.—• -- .---. , ' .".--•.••,..''.'.1/4..."..'.t'?A........t.'ir'-.',_;'':','f..;c1;...0:.tr-;.,!;.;,:1'!:.'..j''r31.7',:s.....1.:.,!:.;,.!,.:", .., .!, .--- '• . ••.7..' ' --,:-:.,:•:.'-.'z,..:4-:,':4.!?:..1.c....":\. 1...Aiii.iA,p....-..4f.::. 1.',•''•' .'l,';,.'''r( '' Legend -t Legend ..'.;. ' • --- ,.-. e•,-; , • . ........ • •Vorit•F1'! ••1,-, "I ., • Pol.,' , • , . ..... ... . •• •.• • 4:t . ........ :,.. -qui . . .... _ • - :.... ___________ _________._.___....._._____._._.___________ :: Ii•1!ALM ni,nu 1;”nr, iN WI%II HEAtli MAP II Vblig,G1P.t,II.Vi:li lia.t 111Nricigrli!,),,.:\arlAmi Iii an Page 955 of 1576 31 Set it,n 1:Stan.of thr Urban F.:1.4 SPECIES VULNERABILITY , • CLIMATE CHANGE Miami Beach's urban forest faces challenges related to climate change including rising groundwater(saltwater Yr inundation),sea level rise, flooding and increases in tetemperature.u' .According to data from that National All3k Aeronautics and Space Adminisl ration(NASA)if the current levels of greenhouse gases continue to be emitted `. . into the Earth's atmosphere-Miami Beach can expect to have 72 inure days above 95 degrees Fahrenheit by 2101V-".These challenges will have an impact on the species composition of Miami Beach's urban forest,as not all the species currently growing in Miami Beach will he able to adapt to these effects of climate change. The USDA Forest Service has developed the Climate Change Tree Atlas which utilizes climate change models to measure the current and future distribution of 134 tree species in the eastern United States. Unfortunately, the Atlas does not currently contain many of the species growing in Miami Beach's urban lin"est,however,it does provide a list of tree species in the Everglades ecoregion•'''1,which includes Miami Beach. Table 4 shows several tree species that grow in Miami Beach and their predicted vulnerability to climate change. Species vulnerability in the Climate Atlas is based on a multi-faceted modeling • approach that includes utilization of the Modification lactors (ModFacs)scoring system to predict how fr a species will respond to outside disturbances and biological I;ctor:s and how this might affect its future distribution. information on the Climate Change Atlas can be found on the USDA Forest Service website at www.ficled.us/nrs/atlas. #41' PESTS AND DISEASES With its close proximity to a major U.S.port,large urban center and a highly mobile population,Miami Beach's ' rail:.? I r.r.1a?:n1.ufn.vr,:;'1)1.51?MU ;rI111ft1;s"i'.iiaL\SUA1n lteacmc.titluera.•1nn,1 rlil1F_t'r'$r ra'1i.'F.'(.7.lAr.4Tl.(.1145 GF.555i:Alr.At ? + Model CliMati Vuliti•r rbiltry Specie s Beath Public 11..1' Reliability highlights { l v- .,..7,',:,..' TrecI ,4I4 Uwe oak Moderate Significant loss predicted, 596 15-43% ' • -- 8aldcypress Moderate Possible minimal losses <1%Southern Moderate No projected change <1% I magnolia Slash pine High Possible minimal losses ' <1% 'Laurel oak High Loss predicted,up to 30% I <1% Minimal loss predicted, <1% •Redbay High around 10% ---- 'Pecan 'Pecan low No projected change <1% White oak High ..........._._No projected change .:_. <1.% i t:liy.I Miami 13,01 956 of 1576 Li bar:ro•i-.a 5145;er I't.in 2025 urban forest is susceptible to pest and disease problems and is at high risk fur future pest introductions.'this,coupled with the due to the large number u1'palms planted throughout.the city. "^i, current changes in climate,make the community vulnerable to Fusarium wilt: novel pests and diseases.Miami Beach should stay alert to the Canaiy island date palm wilt(caused by the fungus Fusarium . following pests and diseases that are of most concern to the oxysporum f sp. canariensis) and fusarium wilt of queen — ,fid; lti ; " community forest asset: and Mexican fm palm (caused by Fuse rium oxysporum f sp. palmarurn) both threaten Miami Beach's urban forest. 'the Ganoderma butt rot: common name of each disease is indicative of the species of palm t 'Plwk;_ Trunk rot caused by the fungus Ganoderma zonatum is a lethal they infect,but they overlap in their biology.symptomology,and % J. disease of palms.This pathogen is difficult to detect because it control.In palms,Fusarium wilt rapidly kills trees by disrupting .f - compromises internal tissues of the trunk and foliar symptoms the water-conducting tissues. First the pathogen attacks older / a "' appear after the pathogen has caused significant rot.Ganoderma leaves,typically one side of the leaf'desiccates and turns brown. I. butt rot spreads by spores and infected plant materials.Methods 'then the pathogen moves to other parts of the canopy.Fusarium er I. to control the disease are limited to sanitation practices such as wilt of palms is easily spread through wind transported spores, a sterilizing pruning equipment and quickly disposing of infected but also persists in plant tissues and soil.liff'ective controls for materials.This pathogen can infect many species orpalms and is fusarmnt wilts are lacking, but sanitation measures CU hel ki0:: ` Pa R y P R. P r t, the most common disease coin promising palms in Florida`'. prevent these diseases'. � - Lethal yellowing: Granulate ambrosia beetle: Lethal yellowing is a palm tlise ise vectored bya Sap feeding insect The ranulate:unbrosi I beetle X losantb'us crtssius otos was �, Y' k P ' 1 L R ( Y ) Q w called a plant hopper.When infectedplant hoppers insert their first detected in South Carolina in the 1970s,and y.; ,' '- tr r ct P e{ hI t I:t mouthparts to feed on the paten tree tissues,they also secrete a throughout the state of Florida.This beetle feeds on heartwood :` phytoplasma(a kind of wall-less bacteria).Lethal yellowing can tissues,butsecondary cankers can form on the bark where beetle h , l' he identified by symptoms including premature fruit drop and entrance and exit wounds occur.This ambrosia beetle has the ,r , • discolored or dead leaves.Foliar symptoms first appear on the potential to colonize healthy or stressed trees'"(Atkinson et al. If r. oldest leaves, Lethal yellowing is one of the most threatening 2000)and has a large host range.Known hosts that are commonly 'td^; 't. diseases for Miami Beach to be aware of because it rapidly kills planted in Miami Beach include Australian pine and mahogany'''. t ntM lir ". .cyt marry kinds mf palms.Damage is primarily seen on coconut palm, '' one of the most widely planted species in Miami Beach, Gypsy moth: , ' ! • , • I he gypsy moth(1 ymant ii dispai)was(list hi oul,ht ft urn I tulips rliit'ii,:.,, Lethal bronzing: to Massachusetts for its potential in silk production in 11169. Like lethal yellowing, lethal bronzing is palm disease that is Escaped moths became significant pests in the northeastern •_,.'a .ea...,. ' .4! liiiii":11111 vectored by a sap feeding insect called a plant hopper When United States and have continually expanded their range.During ,t; - infected plant hoppers insert their mouthparts to teed on the outbreaks,caterpillars chew on leaves in incredible numbers, 7. t. .. '• iiiii palm tree tissues,theyalso secrete a th to I oma i kind of resulting in defoliation of the entire tree cans 'their feeding + wall-less bactgrfa). This disease is relatively new to Florida,first damage weakens the tree host and renders it more vulnerable to I,Timl.nrutsuvr, identified in II llshorough County,Florida in 2006'Symptoms of other pests anti diseases,especially if ded'nliation occurs several rrurrnrr:ItIIT tgafltruI 1111.1,71 NEWS xn,rrsnr. the disease include premature fruit drop and discolored or dead years in a row.'1'he gypsy moth is known to feed on hundreds of leaves. Foliar symptoms first appear on old leaves closest to the species of trees and shrubs.As oaks are one of their preferred ground,eventually moving to younger leaves and finally the spear hosts,Miami Beach's live oaks are of most concern. leaf.Once it has infected the spear leaf the palm,the heart or bud has died,and the palm will die. Like lethal,yellowing,this is one of the most threatening diseases for Miami Beach's urban forest age• • stee I:state eiale carni Pnrest o x 13 11 t1•Ni 1.111'1{V i.i.'ll: i: L)7.1)7:mid:•.:,•11 1ta:1 is at'15A11 9LS I.JO @5fi a6ed 5"1.{{ •1 �r a�i:. .. li p• • Y .lilllu • #1° a , 4111111 41 . . I ,ig, ,, wr w it0 ,,...1,,,,, .:„Ir,y1,1:.:11 . 001% IA 10 1 • 4: e . . i it • Age Dstribution(PublicTees E.F.alrns) 0.5 045 _ ❑ate `.. V,ri]s `, SIZE AND AGE .. 0.: • The size distribution of trees and palms in Miami Beach's urban forest can serve as a general predictor of the relative g eaS _________ age of the resource. To maintain a sustainable urban lorest,the tree population should be distributed across a variety 1 `, of size classes(measured at 4.5'above ground level--diameter at breast height, It)working towards achieving the n.,a Mai) recommended distribution of: 0'8• 4:4.1'' 18.11' -1e''t• 'Wang Ism tane•d Nana•ng Mala•e • 0-H"DHII(Young)-40%of public tree population tree5ose IG'ameter at Breast heishtl • 9-17"Dfil I(Established)-30%;of public tree population • 1H-24"HMI(Maturing)-20%of public tree populalions A1,1/It 1- :1,/AM:nISIR/ItlrrmN•hnrrr.rr.rtist ....--Mi.m,Reach T.r.n -Rro.nnendrd • liver 24"I/HU(Mature)-1(1%ofpublic tree population An analysis ofsize/age distribution of the public tree inventory found Miami Beach's trees are young(0-0"')lilt)trending Sit a Distribution(Public Trees) towards established(9-17"DEBI),with trees in the maturing category(18-24"UBH)below the recommended target of es 20%. The analysis looked at public shade/ornamental trees only(Figure F),palms only(Figure(I)and public shade/ 00A ornamental Ores and palms-(Figure II)and public all three analyses shared a similar trend line.line to redevelopment 'ops �� and impacts from high winds/hurricanes, Miami Beach's tree canopy consistently trends towards a younger age OA distribution.In order to ensure a sustainable urban forest and ensure canopy cover does not diminish Miami Beach '2 0 u should focus management activities on preservation and care of existing maturing and nature trees. S `.2 gots s, _ 0.1 . 045 0 0-9' 9-17' 10-24' CA,1,7. Yoang ralablaned M,Ia'wg Mauve I,615.ad ICIa rete,at Bita.t Neighll F15i112s.I;S111./AGE ilrvrruHll7NA' lute -Mn-„bean Imes -R�:o•meMed Size Distribution of Public Palms 0.6 o.s .• • • Va.4 +' a • a • L 4.1 • 0.1 u ` ea' 547' la-:ra' _ ,:4' 'loans raoolsr_d 04a1R•bs MaLme tree 5 ne!Diameter at breast he i g htl rrcwrr:lr,121i/N:4.pistlennimIN-rkT's;ImII ---MianiBmch Palma AP,aamme Idol I ALMS -age 959 of 1576 senium I,Sint.:4 the Prb.ir:Fon.,i 45 Tree Canopy [ s t ' a a Poseibte Tris Panting, z v' . • by Street Segment a 5p .. v t by Streit Segment • # K V.Im E Miami Booth.FL 1I�I ally P Ifu�t u Miami Beech,ft �`.I4I ii..,• 11 r r , r �. a F t In Niw'"F• • r 1 '. . , _ t. .. p i l� {l iIF �t r ,'; g t.g :r1 � b;�~ t„:u1Itl '” u '46. IL�PI"r. i �I �,�'rdM'. P.y 4 � •Ir 4•1 rl�rl�ill l9 i1 X111 STREET TREE STOCKING ,�, . 4 -t. r , *,,, A street tree stocking level analysis was conducted utilizing "...."`•:-..-:0,",','S.:11!4.; I ' 1 ry ''r«flu I - h?,�p1.� `- ;-'': ..'.�'t'31i.5:A$ ^ .. • . 44 ''' �k,14i 4.'.....,..•iiI, Fri yl,d• the ll'I'C assessment and the City of Miami Bcach's street tree • _ +.., ' >,' - +� 'w 't1",.t• .+.�`• �° t I .- t'�t �+.t • ' 1: ear. . inventory data. Stocking level,in an urban forest,measures ). to it,;4:1! y 'huj II(; n:IPS!'r: vvr"'.a t 141J'.I # w�' the proportion of existing street ones compared to the total r_' + s • �• , 1, , b � number of possible/potential tree planting spaces and ern help _ f� t}•' 1 ^.tfiy' ,4' • } T .; ilFIII'lt".111,,ir II4 i gilt `r 5 �` i.' i _ to determine tree planting needs anclbudgets. IlaveyNesource ,`I h6 try .' til4Xhtlr") l' g' ? .t : , h` Group recommends a stocking level of at least 911%,where no 'a -)1 M' r more than 10%1 of the planting sites in the right-of-way are '''•:'- I,. ' r tt'gill• 4.y,ripl�t%Ili� c,„• .•4 r ••7.4 "i'::, 4!t' IJ, 1 y�4"It ..yl•%I h;' • ,rc t<�• t:r 4 t I: ,; )"'' ill vacant. ^ J� i$ 's1.`: ' .r+ 5 t: f �,t w it Fnrthis anal sisthecut'renttreec:ano h street it - 1. . ,.... ijiiPL,l s# � d I �;' °erfl,f 1IlidE' Y PY Y l k'�'w wn ,l ,X Y w°r. ! assessed(Map{Wand then the possible tree planting locations • i� *' ;- fX, °,n.l t�iXWil l"f d�',�I�'' I •SIT Y ��5�^ t.;'i. a.fii, .'m6,.< r "t ;.:re. i I:, . by street segment were identified(Map 1V), Possible planting • ,. SLI��; l lg Ca.q }IR fI(, _. ,'.,.. rll�}h 1 �� E1r. I :715 '..:tie . ,., .r-, �'^,�r? y t , locations are those sites identified as vacant or currently ' + • c available for tree plantingand do not include sites that could be , •' d r w' �4z: V,!''I i `% Cllr F, ' hp�Itll hl g.rl ` f • ti i4{. h1rJl�fta�w ! . t ibU.r h 9 ►ri_r.,c, 9retretittc•d ui allow fur u'cr planting. '1'tic street tt•ee stacking . l°; _ _ Ia : + ;•..• '. % o I;.:.• n 0 -t,1,c Iw „ g^y j>',,5tH 0 • • ,t • •A:, :.'rr:x• _ ' j:.Ilo !! fi .15 level analysis should be utilized :dung with the uritis heat to %di t y' p t I`',' < �;� t island assessnit'ntto prioritize street tree planning;and identify ( :t i %sir t. .�. .4, •'!11111rIe ,-%r t1.-. it` :.. :Y ,n, '.i:.).4.tI p• $.,'' v t 1 , gar" ,r0::.-: areas that could he retrofitted for tree planting in areas with a •"6 • • _ • d"'"' S high need lire Live canopy but low available planting locations. :. l � " `/ '3` I .0 PlmIlwe 1.40.1 p it ".•, ::X 5 kTi " IF ;•' >:+ Nrym,4 w ISM 1 k • A Ir A • i . r �t.lu Yep,x�"�A . YSQ� i�ce'• � •� � IIIJ 1 V, :l V. MIt L _--—z1. w.� ' I 2 S !ii,'. ' • �:,..,1 ti4—._. _....• �, 41 ....#.. .. .r_ .....-........... ...:,,,. ....t .....,•,f•11h,Y5•1..,„11ik1..,,,.,.tr_51 ".If i. ,. , r.l,'�1-LCM,.?I•:,f�i,l,:ish'1],h.,.V15(' Page 960 of 1576 ail City of MI:'Ini 114,14:11 !'limn 4ivrst Masier Man2l120 N URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE h ; +r. ' L-' ' 4414 The care and maintenance of the City's community tree In accordance with the City of Miami Beach Code,Section 46-62.6,the primary . resource is provided by a combination of City staff,contracted responsibility for the maintenance of trees and vegetation in the right-of-way/ professional services and private property owners. The City swale(ROW)is the adjacent property owner. In a few limited areas,primarily ; • ri has three divisions that have tree care, maintenance and commercial districts,the City's Greenspace Management Division,is responsible • lr''$'4, management responsibilities. While each division (detailed (Or the maintenance of ROW trees,however this is a small number of trees and below)has a unique set of duties,they each have International the vast majority of public ROW trees arc the responsihilrty of the adjacent R Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborisls on staff and actively properly owner. coordinate arid collaborate on urban forestry activities. Property owners are required to obtain a permit from the City's Urban Forestry ND 4111111F Urban Forestry Division I Environment and Sustainability Division for the planting or removal Many ROW tree. However,not all property • �,�i Department owners/residents apply for a permit leading to tree care activities that do not Ilk • Regulatory division responsible tier overseeing tree permits, meet city standards and leave ROW trees vulnerable to decay,insects,diseases, • • + ordinance enforcement,private development plan reviews and and storm damage. internal/ external project coordination. The Urban Forestry Division was started in 2015 when the City adopted their own Tree care activities that occur under City-approved permits or by City staff/ tree protection ordinance. The City's Urban Forester;who was contractors,are completed on a reactive basis and not through a proactive or _ : previously in Greenspace Management is now housed in the routine maintenance program. Urban Forestry Division. Lack of a routine and systematic maintenance'program for all ROW trees puts VII; ' , ' 1 iGreenspace Management I Public Works Department the urban forest at risk,impacting their health,condition,and storm-readiness. . 01 y Mr .,,rc3!Ili , Responsible for landscape maintenance in medians,parking lots, Trees pruned on a routine basis develop proper form and structure which leads coastal areas,non-park city facilities,and select rights-of-way to a variety of benefit,includingr': •".�,r,'`, .•ye Greenspace Management oversees city crews and contractors • Lower cost per tree trimmed commuted to reactive pruning dine in response that perform routine landscape maintenance, including lawn to storm damage,sight clesrince or immediate hazards. care,trimming,edging,hedging and tree care. • Early identification and correction of insect/disease problems leading to '9 � �1a fewer mortalities.s . .; r:,p,rat„' t,u,v, Park Maintenance I Parks&Recreation Department • Reduction in storm related tree damage. `''"''.f,{'•-, Responsible for managing and maintaining the city's park • lower future maintenance costs. ,./;,:-✓ u system. Parks Maintenance oversees contractors that pertitrm � Reduction in tree-related service requests and unproved instanter service t• . •y•..,, .. all routine landscape maintenance,including tree maintenance. • Development of ii he•rlltlr,sustainable and resilient urban forest. t yam' Miami Beach should ev:duate options for assuming the tree maintenance ft "e""'•Li **: :'+ responsibility For all trees in the ROW/Swale to cumuli. proper carr and to ,,,i,1,..:4, ••,.1,,•) t z w u•.r . . :.•-•�,ei •;' ,trr i promote the long-term health of this important component of the city's urban ;t r v �.' E forest. I..}�,.1r •.� a,. Ile;.: 1 • d ,r . 'VJ, r, 141, ,,♦ 'i.ti't •u. ler It INCy %.-•'•k'1 � • wY'I,i•iii "I' IW.' A a , •,;y� `•iii f-f t ii �'`I iii .. 4 . , {4N 1 ' .i fee ' , •)Mb' 37 ~ lun I:Stale olthe t.lrb.ut Furexl image 'A IJrfi,i a Funwl Master Ilan 1n19 37 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS A level of service analysis(LOS)was completed to Scenario: 3-Year Pruning Cycle Year 1 Year 2 develop an initial understanding of the costs that ___.__—.___ _._.-,_ _____ --- — the City of Miami Beach may incur if they took Number Number over maintenance responsibilities of all right- of-way/swale trees and palms. Two scenarios - 'Tree/Palm _ Cost ; Tree/Palm Cost were developed based on current inventory data. CanopyTree Pruning(3 Year Cycle) A 1 3,950 $ 629,775.00 3 891 11 633_840.5 A 3-year scenario,where all trees would be pruned _ ,...r-_ i ---- - on a 3-year pruning cycle and a 5-year scenario, Palm Pruning(Depending on species • where all trees would be pruned on a 5-year pruning 16,732 $ 2,227,680.00 16,732 cycle.in both scenarios,palms would be pruned 2-4 pruning 4x or 2x per year) _ � _� _ $ 2,227,680.00 times per year depending on species. Tree&Stump Removal 119 i $ 46,900.00 126 $ 50,145.00 Scenario Notes:Tree pruning,and removal costs are Palm&Stump Removal .-11 i 157 I $ -39,981.00 156 j $ 40,994.00 provided as a reference and are based on general, — --7----- — average contractor costs in South Florida for tree/ TOTAL �^ 20,9511T$ 2,944,336.00 20,905 $ 2,952,659,50 stump removal and pruning to thin deadwood and raise canopies.To determine actual City of Miami Beach costs detailed tree pruning specifications along with the number,size and location of trees - and palms should be developed and provided to tree care contractors for estimates. Scenario:5-Year Pruning Cycle Year 1 Year 2 Number f Number 1, Number of Trees: The following have Tree/Palm Cost Tree/Palm Cost been Factored into the number of trees to be pruned each year: Canopy Tree Pruning(3 Year Cycle) 2,370 I $ 377,865.00 2,299 $ 373,859.00 • After Year 1-3%of trees will move to Palm Pruning(2x or 4x per year depending on 1 the next diameter classeCies I 16,732 $ 2,227,680.00 16,732 species)) I $ 2,227,680.00 • At Year 3 and after-Trees plantedi---.two years prior are added to the B- Tree&Stump Removal_ 119 $ 46,900.00 126 $ 50,145.00 diameter or less pruning cycle trees Palm&Stump Removal 157 $ 39,981.00 ' 156 $ 40,994.00 2.Costs:Alter Year I-include a 2%cost - — -- - increase TOTAL _ 19,378 $ 2,692,426.00 19,313 $ 2,692,678.00 3.Tree Planting riot included :1:1 ::t. i r,i.mi liv.irlr Page 982 of 1576 l4Inri F i i t'd�r;ati f -n 2Cei1 ; 11�pu�'a�N IgnIi' ' m;plhipmlluh lpll il- i"rl�t . II 1I111.N' `y TREE AND PALM MAINTENANCE LEVELS OF SERVICE • . 1 �"�^",+'° Palms require more intense and frequent maintenance While Miami Beach utilizes contractors for tree care than shade/ornamental [lees, Depending un the consulting, invetttot'y updating and tree care activities P 9le +li species, palms require pruning 2-4 antes peryear to to meet workload demands, citystaffing needs were .. • 0I ) e"":!NI ,I III hlli'lilll'; 1�114i f, In I r ql•r i t .1 q I 6 { b Dy 4�f l'F Y�. remove dead/dying fronds,address clearance issues and identified during the planning process. A tree inspector + �I m ,,u ,. ' remove coconuts- While,a shade/ornamental tree,once position to.aid in tree ordinance enforcententand to serve de •,,....:::::,:l.t:1 J�WI�u"y II'14j:h" III �:�t � _ � Ijiq•i t l"�I`i �i properly pruned can be pruned once every 'L-3 years. as an in field liaison is needed to meet workload demands �e ••••::),,,,.:i, +!m' I .t-i� a in the IL Iiin Forestry Division. In Park Maintenance, '•''."..-,:5: ct fl +xj, z,p ' ,,,.-:•.t. .Y. • S'IREE'1'AND PUBLIC PROPERTY a dedicated 3-person in-house tree crew Is needed to .:. yx^i•sy ,liv)i'i,'r r ill L;.r.,'''',' „' C;reenspacc Manage Inent maintains medians,parking lots, Irutdleentc•rgencyand priority tree maintenance activities. coastal areas,non-park city facilities,and select rights-of- way City Staff Training ' • Shade/ornamental trees pruned once per year 1'hescience ofarburicultureand the nmanagement of urban or as needed. Pruning focused on the removal Ibrc•sts are domains that are recognized as special areas of deadwood and address clearance issues. of expertise. Credentials are increasingly requested by municipalities as evidence of competency,and bachelor's • • Palms pruned 2-4 times per year depending on species. degrees in Forestry, Urban Forestry, Environmental Pruning focused on removing dead/dying fronds, Scicnces,antt l{orticultureruie often the base requirements addressing clearance issues and removing coconuts. for leadership roles in urhan forest management. • No plan/programa is in place to require private Professional credentials can demonstrate competency; property owners to maintain the ROW/Swale trees the most widely accepted credentials in Florida come from they are responsible fbr on a routine basis. the International Society of Arboriculture(ISA), Florida .*a,,,,,,,;;,•„ Nursery, Growers and Association (FNGLA)and Florida PARKS Landscape Inspectors Association(FLIA), The ftillawing ...-A..:_. Wit: "`+•xti, Parks and Recreation facilities designations/credentials have been obtained by City staff: • Shade/ornamental trees one structural prune per year �"�'•• - r - • Certified Arhorist(ISA) - • Palms pruned 4 times per year depending on species. - Certified Horticulturist(FNGLA) Pruning focused on removing dead/dying fronds, • Certified Landscape Technician(FNGLA) addressing clearance issues and removing coconuts. • Certilied Landscape Maintenin lee Technician(FNG LA) - Certified Landscape Inspector(FLIA) • Certified Pesticide Applicaun• (FL Department of CITY STAFF AND CONTRACTORS Agriculture and Consumer Services) i411City Staff • Landscape Inspector's Association of Florida A total of9 City staff in the Urban Forestry,Greenspace and • ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified _ t Parks Maintenance divisions are currently involved in city tree ',limning. management .red ma maintenance activities The Cityis committed to having qualified and well-trained 1 m "-'" • - ^"':-•°'"�.• on a daily basis. Leadership within the three divisions staff.'fheyprovide orsupportstafl'intrainingupportunities k'4, iigf{ .x: collaborate on projects and share resources when related to tree care,landscape maintenance,and chainsaw :11A114:#1:r.•00 e+1,'',',.1,4�.'90:0111:41::::ri;:m•it"' :r, necessarybut lhereisnoformal policy onresource sharing. twining- In'LO1H,the City provided atraining course for ;--.-41.,.:0'0:; •.`r, •.,:;.` ,•• •rt,. ,,li • w- 1. The City has a dedicated,full-aline urban titrester position, suili'interested in taking the ISA Certified Arhurist exam. r• T{ t -• {:,'•:( `t" • ..,•,. ':•••1:••` 4,. which is housed within the Urban Forestry Division under The training was offered to Urban Forestry,Greenspace 4"I". l i i`r ;?Yl N` k s + r'• • ,• ^ for •. I .' a' Environment and Sustainability Department Management and Parks staff,and other City departments. hlb°rt tl" VOW:.' �III"� I I 19Y m e ( Il l ill� .•:,•0•,•.IIIt ! „ >. • ''4:.`"'"1 5 • • 1' ", 'k'f '.-.. Ilei .' :: t•F.�''. - R Cad•"W",7 k �,y n - I 10 WtilY6M $I D. c duo RM N. CO ,. dSa Muooyprrwl land rtauihp . • ' Urboo Foa.I►y 7 7 2 Gmenspace . Manopiermit a i ..atal fork MohnN.nce Itt 5 I . Page 963 of-1576 Sc,tion I.SIAle of the[WWII i'o,v+i .19 CONTRACTORS Miami Beach utilizes contractors Iiia large portion of the EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS Maintenance and Greenspace Management previously response and disaster preparedness program.The Urban tree care,maintenance and planting activities that occur While the City contracts out the majority of tree care and bundled tree tare with other landscape services within Forestry Division has developed a Hurricane Plan that on City properties,parks.medians,and limited rights-nf- maintenance work,they do maintain a fleet mit vehicles their budgets and contracts. Without a separate line item outlines the tasks to be completed pre-event, provides way. The current City contracts include all landscape and and tools Iii tree care and maintenance activities. fur tree care,a total budget cannot he determined. In procedures Iitr different storm events,outlines response maintenance activities, from lawn mowing and edging - general,however,the FY 2019 Greenspace Management and recovery activities and provides detailed lists of items to tree care and litter removal. While this practice may • Urban Forestry: Small number of hand tools for budget was $4.9 million, which covered all activities that should be in personal and City go-bags provide contract efficiencies,tree maintenance activities tree planting; measuring devices for inspections, the Division's responsible for, including tree care; the require a specialized skill set and knowledge base that FY19 Parks Maintenance landscape contracts, which TREE CITY USA some landscape contractor crews may mit possess.While • Greenspace Management: Three bucket trucks(1 include all landscape maintenance activities including The Arbor Day Foundation's Tree City USA program City contracts require that an International Society of large;2 small),chipper,grapple truck,mini-excavator, tree care,totaled approximately$1.2 million. The Urban recognizes communities who have made a commitment Arboriculture Certified Arborist be on staff,it does not stump grinder.2 water trucks,chainsaws and other Forestry Division's operating budget is approximately to managing their urban forest. To achieve 'free City inundate that one be on every crew doing landscape small tree maintenance equipment. $150-175,000 per fiscal year. USA status a community must demonstrate they have maintenance/tree care work within the city. This can met the four core standanis of quality and urban forest lead to poor tree care practices that can damage or harm • Parks Maintenance: Chainsaws and pole pruners. Sources of Funding management; city trees and puts the safety of the workers and public The billowing sources of funding are utilized by each at risk. Contacts that are specific to tree maintenance. Tools and equipment are loaned between Divisions, division for tree care,plantingand landscape maintenance 1. Maintain a tree board or department that is legally care,and removal activities that provide detailed work as needed, however there is not a policy in place that :activities. responsible for the care of city trees. specifications, safety considerations, equipment needs, formalizes this arrangement. 2. Enact a community tree ordinance which provides and required worker certifications ran minimize these • Urban Forestry: General fund,tete Tree Trust Fund. clear guidance for planting, maintaining, and risks and ensure that tree care activities are performed in FUNDING donations to the Commemorative'Free program,State removing trees from streets,parks,and other public accordance with current industry standards. Stable and predictable funding is important for the of Florida Urban and Community Forestry grants and places effective and sustainable management of the urban Neat Streets Miami Initiative funding. forest. 'frees are living organisms that are constantly • The Tree Trust Fund was established in 2015 3. Document the spending of at least $2 per capita 1 toward the planting,care,and removal of city trees. • . �j•� +jj`• �T�' •y , , �� ., •T i� growing changing and responding to their environment and generates revenue from fret permit plan }' ,�>; M { • , Theo'health and structure are influenced by n variety of review tree permit plan review fees,inspections 4. Celebrate Arbor Day! .`' • t . hinter:tad abiotic factors, including nutrition,available fees, coda violalimts, fines, contributions, water,pests,disease, wind,and humidity. With regular and mitigation. It has a current balance of The City of Miami Beach has been designated as a t_, �' tmniitoring and maintenance,the negative consequences approximately$500,000. 'tree CityUSA since 2006. �,�•t f,. i. .:( c01 an these external influences on tree health and n rucuoe itb. Z can he mitigated and the benefits and longevity increased. • lime 16 all morativi.Tree Progradonate tt shed • `r� .+ c'4!-•-•1.1 .. in 21116 allows people to donate a tree to the 't IA. - Young trees benefit from early structural pruning and City of Miami Beach to commemorate a petsnn • F.', or special event. -',4a< , training. Simple, minor corrections call be applied cost rY, ;•' , R :., etlectivelywhen atree isyoung;huwever,ifleft unattended, • Greenspace Management:General fund,special r ' j' ,. these structural issues can increase the City's liability and assessment districts and the parking fund. ., it be expensive to correct as trees mature.Eventually they ;i• ce ; 7 5 may be impossible to correct without causing greater • ParksMaintenance:General fund,revenue generated harm to the overall health of the tree. from recreation fees, rental income and the City's ! `,�� 1 public golf course. Consistent fir ndi ng is also critical MI-effective management I c 1 ' ,' of trees as they near the end aitheir life-cycle.Uver-nmtature In 2016.city residents approved a$439 million General , tt: ' trees often require more frequent inspection and removal Obligation Bond (C.O. Miami Beach) to improve y> of dead or dying limbs to reduce the risk of unexpected the quality of life, economy and resilience of Miami : — - J-k •t` failure.A stable budget allows urban forest managers to Beach. The G.O. Dined program includes$S million to ~ t ..:.., a program the necessary tree care at the appropriate life implements street tree master plan and plant up to 5,000 S stage when it is most beneficial and cost effective. trees citywide to increase canopy cover,the timeline for ' fill implementation is 2025. The Urban Forestay Division A total turban forestry budget for the City of Miami is responsible Mr implementing the G.O.bond tree planting 'cs: r • _ Beach has been difficult to determine beeause Kirks project. - STORM RESPONSE AND DISASTER PREPAREDNESS As a coastal community,Miami Beach has a robust storm 411 :arc 4.1?f to rat i 4•ath Page 964 of 1576 [76.n:'r urea etas;e:I'i.n:2i:20 REGULATIONS AND POLICIES The development of Miami Beach's Urban Forestry Master amount of canopy cover. The tree planting requirements Urban Forest Division: Policies and Procedures The City's Code Compliance Division assists the Urban Plan included a comprehensive review of the City's allow palms to be planted, however; they cannot be The Urban Forestry Division has established a series of Forestry Division in enforcing city codes related to tree urban forestry and landscape policies, ordinances and counted towards meeting the required number id trees on polices and procedures related to planning,maintaining protection and preservation, however Code Compliance standards. They provide the foundation for the City's site. Due to the overabundance of palms throughout the and preserving the tree canopy. 'These policies include: is responsible for enforcing all city codes and tree care - urban forestry program, establishing the regulatory city,this requirement encourages residents, developers • Plan Review and preservations violations are not currently a high framework for protection and preservation of the tree and businesses lu plant more shade trees, increasing • fleritageTree Program enforcement priority. Coda compliance officers are not canopy and setting standards for planting and care. canopy cover and tree benefits while allowing palms to be • Commemorative Tree Program Guidelines experts in urban forestry and arboriculture and rely on the The following provides a summary of the review planted as accent plants. • hazardous/Emergency Tree Removal Urban Forestry Division to provide technical assistance on and key findings. • Mitigation Guidclmes ordinance violations. The code also requires a minimum o1 2 lot trees to be • Tree Removal Chapter 46, Division It: Tree Preservation and planted within the"energy conservation zone"of a lot. • Tree Relocations Protection This encourages the planting of trees to shade buildings • Enforcement Guidelines Overall,the City of Miami Beach has a comprehensive and and provide the maximum amount iii energy savings.This • Tree Removal Permit Application Process relatively strong tree preservation ordinance,especially section could he improved by providing illustrations or • Tree Work Permit Tree Work Permits 2018 with new ordinance changes adopted in October 2019. better defining where the"energy conservation zone"is • Urban Forestry Division:Tree WorkPerutitApplication The main goals and objectives cif the ordinance,promoting on a property. - Denial - 700 Tree Work Permits received canopy cover, increasing species diversity and tree • Urban Forestry Division:Tree Work Permit Inspections - inspections Required: preservation align with the goals,recommendations and Chapter 126 provides landscape specifications and - Initial inspection(1) action steps of the UFMP. requirements kir private properly and right-of-ways . 'the policies and procedures provide excellent guidance - Quarterly Permit Inspections(up to 4) This chapter establishes that the care and maintenance to city staff and the community on urban forestry related - Final Inspection(1) Chapter 126,Section 126.5:Landscape Requirements or ROW/swale trees is the responsibility of the adjacent issues. The City should consider developing detailed - 1 year follow-up inspection(1) The landscape requirements in Chapter 126 are property owners. guides on tree planting,care and maintenance to support comprehensive and stringent. The code maximizes Chapter 46 and 126 requirements. If each permit requires all 7 inspections-the two- the number of trees that can he planted by requiring Chapter 126 could be enhanced by referencing tree care person Urban Forestry staff in 2018 would be a maximum average spacing of 20 feet. While this can and maintenance guidelines/best management practices Enforcement Challenges required to perform 4,900 Inspections per year. place trees close together,over time this will increase the from the International Society of Arboriculture or guides/ While City staff works diligently to ensure that trees are That is 18 inspections per day in addition to their brochures developed by the City. preserved during development projects and as part of other Job duties and responsibilities. 'tree Work Permit applications,there are more activities 1,111111111111 than current city stallcan address. .....it - - - it:J.-v.460k a .1.1.111 . Ifs" J� • ,, 4 1 . r si.. tY.i... u se,rion L st,nr,.i ihe1 rL.n:::,,est 'age •11 REVIEW OF MASTER PLANS, STUDIES AND POLICIES EVALUATION CHART — Q .<I•!U.UI„In,.UI M:,:..i it:., -�v.--_^y"1.5 forestry issues through its website and by holding events, n 151.:r,•.,-u:I.,.••':, C.•„ --�-.�- ...------ .:_-- like free tree giveaways. Uoweve; the effectiveness of these communication and outreach effort is not known; and engagement about the benefits of trees and the role n I Fb:e••I :,_..:...: ........w.,,, ,� — the community plays in their planting, preservation, protection,and care has heen lacking, 2 1' :':,' ,•••1'.' .• ' , , REGIONAL COLLABORATION AND COORDINATION • i .1 Sustainability and climate resilience are important issues tint communities in South Florida and Miami Beach actively collaborates with regional partners to develop 1 r:,:.;,:Ir,LIPMMAN Itll,!5110 OW F PIAN and implement a unified vision. n:. ti ,.• na: 01 I r.,, •.v' "•r•,.• ....atria, The City of Miami]leach is a partner in the Greater Miami & The Beaches collaboration with Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami. The partnership has developed the CITY PLANS A review of select City master plans,studies and policies Rcsilient305. Across the City of Miami Beach,divisions rind departments was conducted to evaluate the influence that each will increasing the climate nirtrgatrorn benefits that shade trees are actively working to improve and enhance the services have on the Urban Forestry Master flan. The graphic can provide to the community, In 2010,the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change provided to the Miami Beach community. Ti enhance above summarizes the results of the evaluation. A large Compact,a partnership of Hroward,Miami-Dade,Monroe these services,plans,studies and strategies are developed majority ofthe master plans,studies and policies reviewed The studies,plans and policies ithat may have a negative and Palm Counties was formed to help collaborate and implemented While collaboration and engagement will have an impact,either positively or negatively,on the impact on UFM P intplumettation include the Washington and coordinate on climate adaptation and mitigation across City departments and divisions is strongly implementation ofthe Urban Forestry Master Plan. AvenueVisionand M:titerl'Ian,thetlpdatedTranspnrtatinn strategies. The Compact still exists today and now encouraged, there are times when Urban Forestry/ Master plan and the Atlantic Greenway Network Master includes representation 0-or n the tour counties,plus local Greenspace Management/Park Maintenance may not be Studies, plans and policies that ranked highest include Plan. They ranked lowest because trees and tree planting municipalities in the region,including the City of Miami engaged,and avoidable tree damage or removal occurs, the '2010 Sustainability Plan, Urban Forestry Division were not mentioned, considered or incorporated as Beach. The compact developed a Climate Action Plan that At other times engagement does occur,but the priorities Policies and the 20111Green infrastructure Center's urban design elements or considered an important element in includes recommendation NS-14 to promote urban tree of the program/plan/project conduct with urban forestry tree canopy and slurmwater study. 'These studies will improving user/pedestrian experience. canopy. goals to preserve, protect and enhance the city's tree have a positive impact on implementation ol'the 11FMP canopy. In most ot'these cases,the priorities of the project because the recommendations arid actions align with COMMUNICATION AND OUTREACH take precedence over urban forestry goals, the purpose of the UFM I'to increase Ute canopy cover, The City of Miami Beach provides outreach and focus un preservation and protection of mature trees and communication to the public on tree planting arid urban 42 City,::Miami!n•ad. -age'••O • Urban P,nrsi Masl,-r Plast 2020 . - _ cam .:--.7-__,.; - -i 4 _ - " _ R;r Y Fr (_ ,-.1-."-±--• ti { ' - - - - k , Y 1 - : : ' -1_ ':: '----". ----..!-: •„,-_: -,".---_,..-. -1. 1-. ',.,,,- '.--1 , -,_ .• ,' -.-_i. ', - - : . iii .. t r ._• • r, _ }.,.T INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST City Stall and Public Engagement a- �� REPORT CARD City of Miami Beach residents and staff were engaged • r The Indicators of a Sustainable Urban Forest were during the planning process to understand the needs, utilized during the UFMP development process to challenges and opportunities they see related to ti comprehensively understand and assess the current trees and the urban surest. Ouu-each and engagement state of Miami Beach's urban forest. The Indicators occurred through puhlic meetings, stakeholder �y ei help to look beyond tree dataand analysis("The Trees") interviews,and one-on-one conversations. The results '' '� yy to also understand how the urban forest is managed of this engagement helped to detine the ftamewm-k for s v' ("The Management")and the network of stakeholders ttit Plan. .401°. 'v i that influence and impact it('.The Players'). For each '�" In general residents and City staff shared the following }. y component, "The Trees", "The Player and "The K Y• • y' '• ;. Management"a list of Indicators and metrics are used desired outcomes of theliFMP: t �' to assess the city's current performance level related to r fw that component. • Increase shade/ornamental trees in the urban forest, r� w while rcdot rig the Palm population yt•i •• a', r SY - The report cards detail the City of Miami Beach's current • Focus efforts on the preservation and maintenance y • • _ performance level for each of the Indicators. The of existing shade/ornamental trees Indicators were assessed by City of Mi:nni Beach still • Collaborate and identify opportunities to preserve + ' •_ •fadd• and the Oy's WWIconsultant team orMiey Resouce trees ns shade tree canopyy on City • y and Florida Department ofIrans Transportation projects.Group, Inc. and Calvin,Giordano and Associates. The • ` • results were used to set the baseline of where Miami • Provide tools and strategies tor to assist engineers, {_ $ • - Beach's urban forest is today; identity gaps in the landscape archilcrLs and designers in Mu-easing and areas of improvement;and were the basis shade tree canopy cover throughout the city. ti. } for setting 11FMP goals,recammenda[ious,targets and • Ihireaseoutreach and education tib 71tl:'. •f,• action steps, � , V - P`,4 ,-,„; s . ti •19 ail: 1u.n:6:Sc:r..1•. Page 96B of 1576 rrlau:isrra nts:e:Plat:.4:;!u Report Card: Indicators of a Sustainable Urban Forest INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST: INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST: THE MANAGEMENT THE TREES •Wu ouch Toney Illelllant Droll 1,.67). TM.Inveclair item lroo Cancpp 1.12.Jc CPicirlion•no Canopy Muoinnorn comma nor woblt.so Moment:4n Monospor sal Plias bcora anStirsana nricornoccuiliic op chnno rolonsinp cor pima. Men Manaciernsal Proorem 1.1=.111•Nm rft1r11-..01,r• Pagadolonro. VolKdanibr 02040110160d Pcibkly-0..d buss 1110Wsi eintu.a.sanatt• droaz flointion Ptomain Cal.:Ike r ubilc lnuo•shiora rak MAIL*cnotrurcone on oinaPkotarincle *bubo T,..belounon Paley GarcIPlen al Public 1, •North Booth Om:mi.:lora* 1.0%t Po Inerearoans CV*Sicillina and Pautranora OcaordnoPel 1w en Priouborrecceclu Minium PT*I Whoa Hoff. tar ptnamenoc Obeslol Propurodnou&Imipurno %cecina lavinlly ltinilicaur Irak ma cizoigniobrom Conninunkofkin /12/1Vraiy.filo C01406.40/wd Ccuincieb Whinny COM meforiSca socwheliff•an culuildivinforinci ctorp bp cardiac Monogamy.*hoellcorsiikaudnicts 1111COnn•• SpuicuienclIon"Mono Le* uter:o •uoit NECIROO:Glorprponcua nuperoicipaccoarr palm ru ninivire .41111UN NIGH rokroiccursomic mob Wan Sectiiin I:tit,iti•of thvIcIc. ago 969 of 1576 INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST: 11 H THE PLAYERS ' . 110Moen1 Boov h Today . . e t Motokterhood Aallon V 1016 th 14 I te...141 ..4... Lame?rho*end lailWillol Landholder Inv otremonl :F• 1111011 • . .. 0 . . ... . . .."i.k. ... '• .". .... •!I, s / , ;Green Indusk•in•cmtal•Iml .. 1 . 1 f •'• ' . . . Ck Cormerision aesd Constreilme Impopeeosal 111 . • . • .....'‘ . Ctiy O•pc•immTlfAqsacr Coucetallon -•..•-•.•-•-•. 411111111...1.81. 1 -.In 41101#11#06#1 4 4 /gender ErvagonrotA •, i si! . .... .. - t .,-. „,. . ..-4, • . . Miley and Jlesl.Aipowcy ingpowouswl '.- ...” ' . H... • ..,',A!' ...PL 01.N.; - Vi:,. .xel ",.1".. 'i•. ::.".:0,..• .,-,1,....,.. l''';';•.t 4'•... 'kY . Oevelopm,Ingeomord JIII! ' if.. 4111 ., ,,: • . . ,e, .• ., -,. • , .4. • : • Public A.M.11003S .. CI•11101'. . . NM" •.I . • I t iv.. 6 Itaglesval Collaberalors -,- .. :•.,4. • , `.‘,r. . • Page 970 of 15 tb -If, City of Miami Ihlich l Irhan F.,a-st M.i,t,,r Nan 2ir.2ii . - - . .. - - - = k. W 00. WE G = • .-7- g.": 4c1r.! •-:•:•744,„(i • - Yt�,�pr� ^. .„. ... „. „,,,if ' ®f J• { , • -' The research into the City's current and historical efforts The'Targets were established based on urban forestry `` in urban forestry has revealed opportunities to enhance priorities established during the UFMP planning . F the resilience of the urban forest resource as well as process: increasing tree canopy cover; proper , -4. r.' iruproveefficiencyandeffectiveness intree maintenance tee care and maintenance and collaboration and v.:r'' • and management The criteria and indicators.-"in this engagement. The Green Infrastructure Center (GI(:) l ;al r j p �, ` plan were used as a reference standard to assess the urban tree campy assessment reported that the yy °ilpi.i�*•• +�'• r .� i 1 It# r''''! �„• 1, .7,i to 1 current state of Miami Beach's urban forest and provide city has 2G'/, potential tree canopy. if all currently i 1.i11I"� - d!i _ the framework for goals,targets,recommendations and available "potential planting sites" are planted. As action steps:l'he Plains reconunendations are organized stated in the GIC report, potential planting sites are -�► I around three strategic goals which were developed identified based on;in assessment.using;aerial imagery, .. • ' through the lens of climate adaptation and resilience and only about 50',/,of these sites are typically suitable and arc based on the components of sustainable urban for planting once the sites are field-evaluated. The 1'0 ,T - tbrest. 22% cannily target was developed, assuming that i r approximately 50%of the possible planting locations TREE CANOPY(TC): Protect and increase shade tree are suitable and available lir tree planting. •. canopy to ntaximiY.e the environmental, economic, health and climate mitigation services trees provide to Miami Beach. - PLAN&MANAGE(P&M):Sustainably plan and manage - - the urban forest to help mitigate the effects of climate change and support.Miami Beach's climate adaptation �. . efforts. • .., w .d. a • ' t, r CONNECT & ENGAGE (C&E): Connect, educate, ;urd • ' „ - engage the Miami Beach community and stakeholders . i about the benefits of trees to support implementation of - _ the L'FMI'and urban forestry initiatives. . .. • ; y ` ♦ „.. • he cay r.rno.insi g1,10 'age• ° tfrhae Forest Master Plan zrzo h49L51 to CL eBed lagan:ucq.41 011110.11:15:I 1.51:aa5 . ?;rt:4j . •Yr • .I. 1..;..;' papaau ce'asinaa pue 1 c ;',y ir: ''`i ' 4,m;t; 1 'e,,`> C unuu5 ue d auetram ueiisl:il lsaao u5 Mama){ #W1 1 .'�; .'::'.r; •: :X :'bi... w" :.1h.'OP... :'{'`_` '.3i'I" II I H U ,1 q fl 6 told e▪r.,` _ • k: TREE CANOPY (TC) Protect and increase shade tree canopy to maximize the environmental,economic,health and climate mitigation services trees provide to Miami Beach. TARGETS Acldeve 22%tree canopy cover city-wide by 2040. • RECOMMENDATIONS & ACTIONS RESOURCES &TIMELINE IMPLEMENTATION LEAD TC#1: Ina k,yu:3nt'ty,evaluaic,led ropiintcm troo canopy cove'iienid>.nicltrdiiii;.unouut.Ind annn,11 bene''i, ACTION:Conduct a.comp reh en sive tree benefit analysis utilizing ground urveys and the I-Tree..Eco RESOURCES:Funding City staff,Consultant Urban.Forestry Division„ application to establish solid baseline data of the benefits both public and private trees provide to the city. Complete every 5 years. I TIMELINE:2020,2021 I ACTION:Complete a hit t-resolutton urban.tr'ee.canopy(UTC)assessment in 2022 and conduct historical trend and benchmarking analysis of the urban forest metrics identified In the UFMP. Complete a UTC ""Did Costs`rreeE`•°ne3:5e•ptl19tinpemitat on nrncurd an0 "°P" • LTC ossomerext.115.34000 bend en pnVacrirepe. every 5 years. 1 TC e2: :)rt t'lip i.Inupi,ri ce t t;gc's an,i ire,pl•t:itlm,,in cc,eri°druin plan,,,I: n•Ighi::,tin aI•titit.irt helm%I Ito cit Ide npighharlri:oil canopy nenr•Ivvr,igr ni I S',r, ACTION: Utilize data;from the Urban tree canopy assessment and analys to identify neighborhoods RESOURCES:Funding City staff,Private property Urban Forestry Division thatiare below the city-wide canopy cover average of 15%and establish achievable targets for each i owners neighborhood and a timeline to achieve It ACTION: Develop tree planting and preservation plans for ROW/swale tree planting for neighborhoods TIMELINE:2020-2030 beloWv the 15%average canopy cover.Utilize GIS and tree inventory data to identify possible tree planting I locations and large trees for preservation activities. I ACTION: Create and Implement strategies focusing on private property tree planting to encourage . residents to help In achieving their neighborhoods canopy cover target .1 TC=3: ;:andiral.ttic' i':In,"ov,citiln•;ui.lhvst:iprir,:;1:i, ,el('r:u`handpl.uitingc::ort�In,I:'r.ls:dthe clip[chore'ret'canal}IN lilt rytut.thl\tli,tribtltt•d ACTION: Identify meaningful metrtc(s)to measure equity in tree canopy distribution in Miami Beach(e.g. RESOURCES:Funding City staff,Consultant Urban Forestry Division rental vs.owner-accu led,median household Income,tree benefits per capita,urban heat island Index, and human health indicators) TIMELINE 2020 ACTION:Conduct analysis overlaying the equity metric GIS layers with the urban tree canopy layer. 'rc#4:I)c^iclnp a routine mainIt.ranre.ind prestlrv.Unn progr•rini locusing tin puhlx(,[ropy(shack I trees gto,itr'than Iii"I11-311 --ACTION ttilkse the City's tree inventory/to identify all city BOW and'park tdieigitatertitian 18'DBH and i develop a 2-year inspection and maintenance cycle focused on preservation. [RESOURCES:Funding City staff,Tree Care Contractors Urban Forestry Division ACTION:,Utilize the City's tree inventory to identify all city ROW and park trees 9-17'DER and develop a Gr seaspaee Management Division TIMELINE 3-year routine pruning and maintenance cyder r2020-2023 Parks'Malntenanee Division • I ACTIbN:Create annual budgets with identified funding sources for each program ACTION: Develop tree,pruning and care specifications to be included in tree'care/landscape contracts . a1 i iiy 1)l[.trams Itun9i Page 974 of 1576 Urban Fuad Maier 1,1:11)2020 ti TREE CANOPY (TC) - (CONTINUED) •• Protect and increase shade tree canopy to maximize tite'environmental,economic,health and climate mitigation services trees provide to Miami Beach. • TARGETS i Achieve 229(i tree canopy cover city-wide by 2040. RECOMMENDATIONS &ACTIONS RESOURCES &TIMELINE IMPLEMENTATION LEAD 'IC ir5: IItti:wc the ltrh,tn Fort.:6i.nt<'r Plan Resign Inulktt to idt•wity uppt>runnucs 0 n'tree p1<inting on city print to(e.g nil rustrurttire,utility,tranapnrtatiun•nun-motorized tr.'ttiportanun):unpunvc dtvcnity, .rid ensure that.porter are suited t,'the c:.rngnrg site i un•.!iti,tn'in\l i;inti Beach.Including salt:water inundation.Crudi:tg.•ea Tyrol rat•,t timate Cl:.ur;t.and invasive 1,i-4s ACTION: Sham Toolbox with engineers,landscape architects and designers to assist in ldentlfying - opportunities for Increasing shade tree canopy cover as part of City Ine aeU'ucture projects. RESOURCES:City staff Urban Forestry Division Greenspace Management Division ACTION:Promote and utilize the Toolbox's,species lists to increase the planting of shade/flowering TIMELINE:As soon as possible °Park Maintenance Division ,., , canopy tree species(non-palios)to increase species diversity within the city Planning ACTION:Consider implementing moratoriums on the planting of certain palm and tree species,genera or families that are move the 10.20-34i diversity rule. ACTION: Develop public education and outreach materials to promote the Toolbox and communicate the' I • City's tree diversity goals. • IC#6: 1'atahh han,l adapt prefer it•d m!nlruntt inti rntunlc St,nntl,ntis It,,taut-ve''partum arc of rt,ttur, trees. • ACTION: Utilize the UFMPToolbox to establish preferred minimum street tree soil volume requirements 1 RESOURCES:City staff Urban Forestry Division and.add to city code and urban forestry bestmanagement practices maynual, Engineering/Capital Improvement.Division ACTION:Utilize suspended pavement systems for all reconstruction and new infrastructure projects on TIMELINE:As soon as possible Planning both public and private property to meet minimum soli volume requirements.See UFMP Toolbox, i ACTION:Ediicate city'deparrments.contractors and developersaboot tninlmum street tree soil volume • I • • requirement and methods outlined in the UFMP Toolbox that can be utilized to achieve minimums(e.g suspended pavement,structural soil,linear planting beds). I , j • I • . Page 975 of 1578 ti,,i inn h Stat.,ti the Pr6d n''ion,: SI P LAN & MANAGE (P&M) Sustaieahly plan and manage the urban torestto help mitigate the effects of climate change and support Miami Beach's climate adaptation eftorts. TARGETS Implement a 5-year urban forest maintenance plan by 2021.By 2050,palms should make up no more than 25%of the public tree population RECOMMENDATIONS& ACTIONS RESOURCES &TIMELINE IMPLEMENTATION LEAD P&M a 1: Si sic:none:Illy and routinely update the scrim,uni p.u'k trey invcnnn V assn' vsig and updating diameter.c(indium),ntaintenuire need,and risk rating olearh ucc. ACTION: Review attributes collected during yearly tree inventory update program,add risk rating and RESOURCES:City staff and/or Consultants,Funding, Urban Forestry Division(Lead) maintenance needs and revise other attributes,as needed. Tablets/iPads for in-field tree inventory updates Greenspace Management Division(Support) ACTION: Develop a risk management policy based on risk assessment tree inventory findings,citizen Park Maintenance(Support) requests,and staff/contractor inspections and establish minimum timelines to address risk. TIMELINE:As snot,as possible Risk Management(Support) ACTION: Ensure that adequate budget resources arc allocated to continue the routine inventory update program where 1/5 of the city is updated each year r.,miri.•d£..o IS ups i So,..........,.e, •r 54').,,,kin;,,,rear ACTION: Develop and implement standard operating procedure(SOP)/policy for updating the street and park tree inventory following tree maintenance activities conducted by city staff and contractors. SOP should identify inventory attributes required to he updated,who:5 responsible for completing the inventory updates,and establish a timeline for completion. ACTION: Review current street tree inventory system to ensure it facilitates data sharing between City departments.allows for updating as work gets completed,generates production,and resource reports and can be shared with the non-city stakeholders to facilitate stakeholder engagement efforts. ACTION: Add data from the North Beach Oceanside Park tree inventory to the city's GIS street and park tree inventory and include park in routine inventory update schedule. ACTION: Utilizing data from tree inventory updates,conduct an i-Tree Eco assessment of the city's public trees every 5 years to measure changes in the benefits and condition of the city's publicly managed urban forest. P&M 52: Explore igip irtuaiiir's t:,develop d p: tree maintenance pioet•ini.uid ii.staler all rigl:t- ol.ie.n'/sii,il, tete m,nnten•ini't•responsibility to the I u p of B,:ne Br.irL ACTION: Create a 5-year urban forest maintenance and budget plan based on inventory and risk RESOURCES:City staff Urban Forestry Division assessment data that focuses on a goal of proactively caring,maintaining and growing Miami Beach's Greenspace Management Division publicstreetand park trees. TIMELINE:As soon as possible Risk Management(Support) ACTION: Create level of service(LOS)scenarios to determine costs to transfer maintenance responsibility (i.e.tree pruning,tree removal,stump removal and planting)of right-of-way trees to the City of Miami Beach.See Appendix A for LOS scenarios to serve guide and initial starting point for creation(tithe City of Miami Beach's LOS analysis ACTION: Evaluate 1.05 scenarios and broader city goals for mitigating sea level rise,improving pedestrian experiences and building a climate resilient community to compare how each maintenance approach (property owner vs.city)helps or hinders achievements of the broader city goals ACTION: Engage the public and private property owners during the l.OS analysis to gain input and feedback. 52 City nl M1ti:nm Reach -age• .o • Urban F,,rest Mosier flan 2020 PLAN & MANAGE (P&M) - CONTINUED Sustainably plan and manage the urban forest to help mitigate the effects of climate change and support Miami Reach's climate adaptation efforts. TARGETS Implement a 5-yearurhan forest maintenance plan by 202I.By 2050,palms should make up no more than 25%of the public tree population RECOMMENDATIONS &ACTIONS RESOURCES &TIMELINE IMPLEMENTATION LEAD P&M 53: `intik and report ia:tree cam plain uug,and maintenance at twines completed i',Gh t't,tr ACTION:Investigate using a GIS based tree/asset management software system(e g.TreeKeeper. RESOURCES:City staff,Funding(intern&asset Urban Forestry Division Cityworks,PubWorks)to manage,track,and report on tree maintenance and planting activities. management software) Greenspace Management Division ACTION: Develop standard operating procedure(SOP)for entering,completing,and closing work orders. and how data is managed and tracked. TIMELINE:As soon as possible. ACTION: Hire an intern in the Urban Forestry Divisum to input private tree data front tree permit applications and private development projects into Open Tree Map. P&.I 54:r,•; trrt it in,inq I`copi nn r'u Itn.rii ms dirt.iii!'.ut,r city imisopy tocr':goals,planting p1 ciiits,.,iiii climate.,tiapt.iiiiui ttgin l� ACTION: Utilize the Green Infrastructure Center's tree planting calculator to identify the number of trees RESOURCES:City staff,Funding Urban Forestry Division(Lead) needed to he planted on public and private property to meet canopy cover targets. Greenspace Management Division(Support) ACTION: Develop 5-year street tree planting plan for the G.O.Bond program focusing on gaps un tree TIMELINE:As soon as possthle, canopy,equity,flood mitigation,urban heat island reduction,climate adaptation and other city planting priorities. Utilize the DRG canopy analysis data to correlate canopy percentages per street wills stocking levels per street to aid in plan development ACTION: Continue free tree giveaway program and explore the development of other programs to encourage,support and incentivize private property tree planting. ACTION: Create outreach materials to educate community on the benefits of trees,city tree planting goals.proper tree planting,post planting tare,and establishment(e.g watering,mulching,and young tree pruning. ACTION: Develop,plan and participate in school Arbor Day celchrations to promote the benefits critters and the importance of tree planting to the next generation of community leaders. ACTION: Engage nonprofit organizations and regional partners to support and help promote private property tree plannng. ACTION: identify anti secure funding to support public and private tree planting efforts. •Sectirnr I:State atilt,I irban Forest Page 977 of 1576 5.1 o;a t.7 9L9I 10 81.6 a8ed t' N7aealuo.) /sptq u!asn.Icy U tIDulaedap/suoisin!(J Alp.latpo Iljni suopeayuads3u!un.7c!aaaa aaetiS :NOlJ.3K a0ueualuleyd>1ae 1Z07.:3NIl3IN suone?!JI adsaleoaaJaNulMacnaaut(V`IN`).4 aa1deg3epuo(d 8•a)saaulaed uols!nla luawa'Seuehl aaedsuaaa 6alstipe!uaaa,)a2e3u3 °gaa easa.l pue aaua10s algeuene asay ayl uo pasey !ao.,,8u!waollad eie saol7enuo? uols!n!O,Salsaao3 uega l}I Js Cl!3:S33u(10 , aansua 0l 6ltenuur suope)!Jpads aaueuaauie a pue aaea aan 3uate roe p ptq aall Ma!nau :NOIJ.OV x.va .01.1C:101111M w nc!c3S1,11I'!.i,,l!1.pur Ieunua.t 1.,!111 w,7a1.,111 .tech.sa!1!.\I1 ..°111u•Ilu!i•u1.1oa0:nn 30'.111/0, 0 anln7una :L{{ :maga a lln a0.1 s7{aed'G!3 e gs!Iyr_Isa 1 707:3NIl3Nf of ttu!punJ d.If)US pue suumsod.ynsnf m paau pa.ealsuowap pue.uouduasap uopisod az!I!Ifl :NOI.LOV (a.loddns) uols!. (3 dalsaaoj uega 'uomsod atp auI pannbaa uopeaygaaa pue uopeanpa'aauauadxa (peal)uolleaaDati pue slfae (uoptsod)Iu!pun j'nets A10:3338flOS pale!aa aan alp bu!ugpto s.tagwaw Mala aaea aa.p1!aed ao!s0o7ldu0sap aop!sod dotanaCI 'NOIJ.3V a 1urualIll rn7.1,1.11S.,I1M!.3auid pill'aar,.1.1n WI 1)N1'.,111.11, , ':i nrn.lad- 1.11:0lge7,,!:9#pm i •uop!sod atp any 01 11tpunlaannesput;uop!sodApsnf1I paaupale'Isuowappile 110nd!aasapuo!3!coda?pla(l :N011DV caanpaooacl 17OZ:3N11311 put,sap Rod puesaoueulpao uope,uasaad pue uop.Jaload aan dueliolua u!1:sauanl1:.1ajjo wn1UixeuU aansua (taoddns)uoisln!0 aOuelldwo3 apo 001)150d asnog mous uo!s!n!0 imum,Cluuapt •uomsod alp au!paa!nhaa su0pea9!naao pue uoleonpa (peal)uols!n!Q 6.11saaod uega (uomsod)Su!pun;l'llejS Xl!,1:S33Nf10S 'aauatadxa paletaa aaa1 o1.p Ulu!pno uo!alxod aoPattsu!aaJI.el 00pdp:e:ap uop!sod do!ana(! :N01131t .3u:wi11(111me?put,.10t11,nuu,.i1!j1:11 pue u!yntf'.,n•,:..id f.,y I,1;tl•:I11•'l:.0!!,' I(uid.,a\in"'.anmuipII.oa.0 nIi 1 Ilunaulua.nll olgt.'Itndsa.I LIMIt`u: ant'111.111 a.!.I!101191.11.! :Se W'Rd QV31 NOIIVIN3W31dWI 3N113WI1'5'S302111OS321 SNO110V 8 SNOI1VaN3WW00321 uogelndod.30.13 a!Igpd all Jo c%,SZ uega a.101u OLE do a>(ete mows sw!ed'OSOZ^8'tzoZ,Sy u a.aueuIIu!ew lsaaol uegatt aea!-s a iustuspl ul 513 021 V1 slao3la uo:le1dupe atewlp s,tpeal7 true!{4 uoddns pue a8ueya aletuI {o naa,>.!a all aae`a111tu dlaq o1 asaa0l uecy n.3141 aeuew pue ueld.lIgeuteasnS a3f1NI1NOD - (vv 7d) 39VNVW '8 Nd1d • PLAN & MANAGE (P&M) - CONTINUED Sustainably plan and manage the urban forest to help mitigate the effects of climate change and support Miami Beach's climate adaptation efforts. TARGETS Implement a 5-year urban forest maintenance plan by 2021,By 2050.palms should make up no morn than 25'/,of the public tree population RECOMMENDATIONS & ACTIONS RESOURCES & TIMELINE IMPLEMENTATION LEAD P&M all: Adopt and tniplenuenl;in urban toresi he:,I tmanagement:sutures manual.. ACTION: Identify tree care activities that need hest management practices(BMPs);which may include RESOURCES:City staff Urban Forestry Division species selection and tree diversity;site selection and minimum soil volumes;proper tree planting,post Greenspace Management Division planting care:watering;mulching tree protection and construction;tree preservation. TIMELINE:2020-2021 Park Maintenance ACTION: Review research and publication;on generally accepted industry best management practices related to trees,urban finest maintenance and management activities'that'support city priorities. ACTION: Engage Green Industry partners((c g.Florida Chapter ISA.EGNLA)in the development of the BMPs and provide opportunities for their review and feedback. ACTION: Publicize and communicate 13MP manual to internal and external users. Explored developing an interactive webpage on the City's website where BMP manual can be accessed. P&M#9: Review h'kin Forest I)ivisi,ut 111111'n-int,plan annually and ievtne,.is needed ACTION: Develop a routine cycle to review and update plan RESOURCES:City staff Urban Forestry Division(Lead) ACTION: Regularly train city staff(all City Divisions)on the Urban Forest Division Hurricane plan Greenspace Management Division(Support) procedures and provide timely communication of plan updates. TIMELINE:2020 Park Maintenance(Support) i�•,.;,:rot:slaty .age 55 OZOZ L141.1.1oisrpq weal] Au All:1 91, • 0 1: ;. :1-!" ••7!" • 1' • •::. •' r •• • ••• , . . •... •••• — . .• • ••; •:•• • • •••:•,••; . 11 I• . - .7.,I : • : .= • ••47.47:.• • ' 401. •=.... • • • • '4... '.4:•:f.::'iro!41; •: . • ".. , 7 •• . ,••• • . . . ,• . . . . • • • • . .• - . . ••.1111111,-;iitv.gip! •!!!!!!'aq:39! il AUI(I A.)111,2;c9:1 [111c1.111.)W jo ,1111 JO OSE..1,01.1,1 (liZI.!;,101.)0,11 All)pur s91110.191.!;:pir.994.1,9!tns 1119.49'0I4411)11,91 •IFELI1)ti;.1 : • :t • - ' ;• -• .• ,.•• ..•.• • .• JI I II I I IJ •. • .• . ; .,••7 91 ii iii ••••• • . • • .. ,• •••• • 4 •-;t,-. • •-1, • - " • . •-•.5,, . • . . . . . • . ,• . : • •. 1-sa.9119 urtkr oti)1144 u(7),1 1:919•'Ll.49•,9,19n1l'u4cipo!Lokia1ti41.•!..:19191:'!u!,9 11,99:1919911 14:11:!..919,19.!:) 3,r) CIY31 NOI1V1N30131dWI 3N113W11 S3011110S311 SNOIIDV 'V SNOLLVCIN311VIA10311 .:' S13 11);(1 (31'80) 30VON3 1.03NNOD al0)45 owls 0•111.1..s • 0 •G6e. • . • t • • ••.. ,• . . • •;• • •• • - • , • •••:• ,;•••-l'•:•:• ' •• vr.,.:•••';' ••.--• -•••••-•`• ,t,i4,4••••••i ••;•;I.p.;;-•;"P•I:r.;";.•;;;:i4.1 ;•P." *;•.'1•.,n1:,••••,: "5y • ; •r••••••.; ••• k ; ; „ '".•• jj: ••,...."•,.,•„•,* '..• '••••••••-••- .•"•-•"-• . ' . C. •• .44 ;"r ".• :• •• • -• • :.• l' •' " '!.:***1 -''.I . •• • '" ▪ • • ". • • *•. • • •• " .;• • • • ' • i''•'.4.J1 . ."'"•:••••::•-•"• :••••••',;"..:;•••..,-Lt,1" ••••' ••.•' " ••• ' '• ••• -7! .• •:••••••,. • • .. • ••;•.?•-,..;• :;••••• • ;••• • '":•-1. • ' • • ••••s, ;:i• 1:: 11-.6- ..••• • •••:,•••-• • • :• ••; •-• ••••••;,:.':.-.• •-• ,••• .,••• •:•••:•.-• ; ....;:...;;;;;;,J.;;N••;r:',....L.!...•-*.r,:t";':;:is;;;;;;i.i.: ;•„-; *;•• ..'•7%17*. • : : • •••*-•4-•`_,*.g'..;fi•;•.:••• •••:• . . *** , • • -*.;:•••;--' 1-* •••.N**-* • ••• • • •••••••• • • ••" -••••-••••••••••••-; : * .•• •••• : ;• • •S• 41'. :-••'•1•••••-•;-••••'••%•%; • • j'4,•• • • '• 5' . ••'.-,• • . .4411 (III.:„...,311 Jul.,1,1.2.10017,.1,,.:::111,z).:: •:,,t)1:1111,',..1•:;:a.ii.11.1:,tcUilill.:1.1:ii),,,'1.,1111'.,,I;I:1:(iIisW1.11;N:1';',,;::-.111.1`a".1,,A:1.11',1,1'.°):11111;'illii,l..)1U:1;144.J'2:iiivuDij -••••.; • "•:'•:.• . • ilr.7.ir';'::•••':•='i•••••Y ;••••••:-..•'•'-^•;.•''!,i.r...N.• :.• • ' " •:" • • • • ;• . :• .; • '. : --•••••-••:• • • • •• •• .• . • •.•••: •. -•-•:' • • I • .. •.. ••••••. ;••:•••'•••"::!••••:,••f.i:".•••• •"••••: ••,•••••••:•-• *': • •• ••• •••• r•, • •' •. • :•••••• ^"'":• • • •: • •e' • • ' •'.;••:4. r •Y.•••;••••-':•••,-.0 . • • . •. • '-- •i•• •••:.• •• . • ' ; : • *:•1;1'••'••• • ••••‘•-• L'• ••• -'1'.4•• ••••• • •••••.'. '•••• '••••••'•.. •-•▪•••-••• ••-• • ••••• • , • • :•••••,.• • •• .••••.• •••••••• • •. • 1".•••••••••.."!•: • -• ••• • •-,.•'..-a7:11F-•••••;..,-'2.• •,_ • " . •.• • ••, •„ • • :•-•••• •- • ..... .... .....- 11.4(1311' r.114,'10.0 11.1)!LIJ U.:A.0111111+1n Mil (Imp, imioniplir 1.10(1(10s 01101,.0f0.0.j'aull>0111 W011Mt(10(1 1010 dOi.Llat.1 `,1'3D ;.-• .";;•••• • •• •-- •••• ;.; • r' .1"0,. • • • • „i • !: • •• • ;.;.• ' :•;••••:- • • ,•••.':i•••7•-••• . • ••• • • '•'' '• - •• ••••• ••:''••• " ••`'"••••• ••••••••1,,•::"'"' ••-• !' • •• ••••••••••'•▪••.••••••...'on r• • • • •▪ •••• •'...!•• •• ••"•, [:.,..:•: .5••.?..:"..• •"•••• •;.. '..e%• " • • • '••••'..-• 4.4 • • • .••.*-••.• ."• -• - •- •' •••'•••• •''-•-• • 1'. sr'',••1*: ***•• ••••• ••• •• •-;z • •• •• . •• • • . • •• • . •.• • • • •• •• •"' ;•- • "*.•• ,•l'f;r:.;,••••t****•,**'*;'*;;;;•;••• •-• .— ••••1.‘nr:11::plik 5)1.1.!::31'13 u.i.+1 t::ili.i)roriiwo;L{',11i ":"1:11/C!Il '111•111 11;111:21(;1"1:;s1;1;1'11 1N113Wli 'S S3D11110S311 • . . CIV31 NOIIVIN3W31dWI SNOIIOY 111 SNOI1VGN3WW003).1 • • •1'. •: •• • S.1.321V1. -• :•• g.V.*:-•i;•;••4.; •;"•: •••• .1*'• ; • 4...**•** " •••• • a311NIINOD - (370) 30VVN3 1.03NNO t- A i . f-, I' 111 • ' .1 1 , i'‘ - AII i ti lit 2. • • 01 OP EN . 1 _. i. 1►�"F' vas% II 'Pr' '- , , lig.1 I 5 t, 1 k. _� • 1 F "1i f 1 }• f = — e L _ T j: -- - _ r tS 4T :-it ....4!, ,n fix. 7., r t ' . .. J yfe ` , ;-x"• ' ra• H yi{y�• . i. '; *--,4''.tea .,.~•, The U1'MP provides an overarching framework to guide the City of Miami Beach in the sustainable and strategic ., '., _ 4 .' p1 esrrvation,management,inaintenance and growth of a resilient urban finest. It presents a high-level review • "V, of Miami Beach's urban forest,its benefits,the City's management program,historical context and the unique • I'' challenges it{;ices. Utilizing this information,the pIan connects the city's vision of the urban forest with goals and recommendations to achieve it. J -ti• - ,•°fr 's''Y MONITORING AND MEASURING RESULTS Resource Analysis • -yJyFi ` The 11FMP is a living document that requires annual Miami Heacks urb.ut forest managers can update the p'° . ' ,. • .. i t 4:;,.0-,r. review and updates based on changes in the orb:ut trete re sow cc analysis over time and in conjunction '0"' r • !+ � v 1: '' forest resource and city priorities,and new research with inventory database updates. The benefits IL ' r, ,.. Y '' ami inlirrnatIon. di,scribed in the III MP are based on information frorn a 1ii the 2017 street and park tree inventory and 2018 `• + . ; ,,, Annual Plan Review and Update urban tree canopy assessment. Future studies can jTheIIFMP is ail active tool that selves as a guide for compare changes against these benchmarks,providing management and planning decisions over the next opportunities to evaluate changes-in species diversity, „ • rt t _� 20 Iears The goals, targets. recommendations, and benefits and the overall resource value. The UFMP k �I . �. actions should be reviewed yearly for progress and recommends completing this analysis every five years +a• f e: integration into annual work plans The Ut MP presents to measure progress and success towards achieving • e !� 1E •+ a long-range vision with timeframes that are intended plan goals,targets and recommendations. : I to he flexible,to allow for adaptations in response to ! r'• . emerging opportunities, available resources, storm Canopy Analysis t, • events, emergencies and changes in community Canopy changes can occur gradually or suddenly.Using +' _ ' priorities.Each year,specific areas of focus should be GIS analysis,Miami Beach can measure and illustrate �• :' r,. f !• . . identified to inform budgets and resource illocations, changes to rice canopy and overall land cover,at a y' t j `` r variety of scales from city-wide to neighborhood level. • lA - 'rhfs udiu'ni.ttion can be used to in lures canopy goals .�' Y , •, • ..t ',. and monitor attainment. A canopy study should be :4 5 % 1•�. v .� • I ! ,� y .,',....'-'''t* �,�..„..,1.. � ` yv� conducted every five year+, or alter major canopy �•� T. t +yam . .. .t . Vf•?i.`� v"`"' . + '�',4�t.�.,.yi h ry canopy- impacting e• ?1 '" it u,' ;. -'.'1'...7-,-'1,..,4.T hit City iii Miann lieurh Page 984 011516 n n:n,I'.n est WSW,'l lv,2020 INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST: THE TREES Recommendations ■Miami Beach Today • Urban Tree Canopy State of the Urban Forest Report UFMP Recommendations:TC#1,TC#2 This report delivered to elected officials,key urban forest stakeholders and the community each year includes numbers of trees planted amt removed,and changes to the overall community urban finest(e.g.,structure,services, Equitable Distribution and value). It serves as a performance report for the UFMP Recommendations:TC#2,TC#3 community,and as an opportunity for engagement.The State or the Urban Forest report can highlight successful attainment of UFMP goals,targets and recommendations, as well as to intitrm the community about any issues or challenges. This information can be integrated into urban Size/Age Distribution UFMP Recommendations:TC#4 • forest managers' Annual Plan Reviews and be used to pursue additional project support and funding. Indicators of a Sustainable Urban Forest The assessnmentoithe sustainable urban forest indicators Condition of Public Trees at the beginning of the plan development process, Street and Park established the baseline or where Miami Beach's urban UFMP Recommendations:P&M#1 forest is today. The goals,targets,recommendations and action steps are tied to these indicators and are designed to move Miami Beach towards a high-performance level Condition of Public Trees and achieving a sustainable turban forest. As the baseline North Beach Oceanside Park metric, the indicators can be assessed periodically to UFMP Recommendations:P&M#1 measure progress in Plan implementation and to develop an annual State or the Urban Forest report to share program successes, challenges and opportunities with Trees on Private Property the community. The charts in this section provide the UFMP Recommendations:TC#1 recommendations associated with each of the Indicators ofa Sustainable I Ir-han Forest. Species Diversity UFMP Recommendations:TC#5 Suitability • i UFMP Recommendations:TC#5 Space and Soil Volume UFMP Recommendations:TC#6 LOW MEDIUM HIGH Swu,'n f:state twin•Immo-,,:.'t Page 985 of 1576 61 INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST:THE MANAGEMENT INDICATORS OF A SUSTAINABLE URBAN FOREST:THE PLAYERS Recommendations Recommendations ■Miami Beach today •Miami Beach Today Tree Inventory Neighborhood Action UFMP Recommendations:PRM#1 UFMP Recommendations CRL#2 Canopy Assessment UFMP Recommendations IC#1 Large Landholder Involvement Management Plan OF MP Recommendations:C&E#2 UFMP Recommendations:IC#4 Green Industry Involvement Risk Management Program UI MP Recommendations;P&M#7. CAE#2 UFMP Recommend;tions:P&M#1 Maintenance City Commission&Committee Engagement Publicly Owned Trees(ROWS) UFMP Recommendations:P&M#2 UFMP Recommendations.CAE#2 P&M#3,IC#4 Planting Program UFMP Recommendations:PRM#4 City Department/Agency Cooperation UIMP Recommendations:1C#5.IC#6. CRI#3 Tree Protection Policy UFMP Recomrnendnlions:P&M#5 Funder Engagement City Staffing and Equipment UI MP Recommendations:CAE#4 UFMP Recommendations:PAM#5. PRM#6 Funding Utility and Stale Agency Engagement UFMP Recommendations.PRM#2 UFMP Recommendations:GEE#2 Disaster Preparedness&Response UFMP Recommendations:PRM#9 Developer Engagement UFMP Recommendations:CAE#2 Communication UFMP Recommendations:C&t#1 Public Awareness Contractors and Contracts LIEMP Recommendations.GEE#1 UFMP Recommendations:PAM#7 Best Management Practices/Standards Regional Collaboration UFMP Reconimendutions:P&M#8 UFMP Recommendations:GEE#2,CEO#5 LOW MEDIUM HIGH LOW MEDIUM HIGH •age•t:•o b2 City uF Miami thi s h l}b.rn fury+l Maxh•r Ilan 20211 • '. ti l 'f .4 •Yifs•, �r ' i •4 ▪ 'TC,.'f .•cAmir-, • :, •.-ti 110:11 :. -: . ' :rte • •! 1. .,v ' • CR — • ,`� :▪V. .1_ti� 1 4: '4 , .. ..:::.....111:::.::..:- .i/.:::: 4".:r:::.7":1744:.:1'.: :::: iy,- , /i,.ri• I!rW:" '4f1.'I • M �T=/: may. 'r' �r.s :.ti • SYas • 471114f • i '.‘ ..4,4„...44 -. .• . t. , •,.ei• . N. • 1, . Z. .%,:i7 br:4,...,.. , . . ' ' ' :t. .'.,'•3.' .•'..'.'. • ' Gly ► s� t� f L , `�Pt+ ♦ t `,!,,• 4.4.`•,,,.. . .k ,..�j. '4 4 , ; 14 'clic -k � • 7 . ,Viiii:' 1' t� } •i k • tl P-x yR i tr .L• Nri )1;4Tr / l► i r ter'• `d . 40. „� Q 4161 .. _ . - Pope 988 of 1578 • The City of Miami beach has made amazing strides towards fulfilling many ofThe engineeringstategiesneeded are itotlimitedtobalancing allthecoInpetitive TACTICS FOR PLANTING TREES. the City's goals towards leading the state and the region in climate adaptation, elements needed to be housed within the public right of way;they also include This section will focus,predominantly,on what design criteria need to be taken resiliency preparation and planning,and incorporating sustainability practices the need to take Into consideration the design needs of a streetscape designed into account at the time of designing streetscapes,designing improvement.s and policies. The urban forestry master plan, together with the many to adapt to the impending rise of sea levels. As sea levels rise,areas within within the public right of ways,or modifying existing roadways that consider recommendations included in the report,are another step in that positive the city that are highly urbanized,will also see a rise of groundwater with the placement and survivability of trees. Recotiiinendautions will be made based direction. In this'Toolbox'section,the document will target specific,design- increasing levels of salinity. The increase in salinity is directly resulting from on street types. related implementable components and strategies to move the city even closer the lack of adequate pervious land coverage areas. These reduce the ability to achieving those goals. A large and contributing component is how trees of the substrate to become saturated and thus facilitates some of the upward This Tool-kit is intended to be a'living'document. As the future becomes can be planned, planted and maintained in arras of the puhlic right-of-way. climb of the denser,salt water. As groundwater with increased salinity rises uncertain and as Miami Beach and other cities around the world begin to Uniquely,because of the City's turban pattern and its desirability asa preeminent and comes into contact with the root networks of trees and palms,it begins to exercise plans for modifying the built environment to prepare and pre-erupt the destination in the southeast region of the 11S,there are many demands competing choke the vegetation's ability to extract freshwater and nutrients from the soil, oncoming impacts of climate change,it is recommended that this portion of the fur space in the limited right-of-ways.This section seeks to establish strategies eventually killing the plant. document be revisited and updated at least every 5 years between its adoption to facilitate good tn'han canopy policies to be put into practice. and 2030.This will allow the City to incorporate yet-unknown new technologies In response to a prognosticated rise of the sea's levels,the City Ls embarking that may corne on-line in the future and it will allow fir opportunities to modify The public right-of-ways and streets of Miami Beach are a challenging sort on a prioritization of streets to eventually raise them so the crown of the road the document to relied.results trout lessons learned in projects built throughout to readily promote and support a robust urban forest. The development meets a minimum pre-determined elevation: currently,at the time of drafting Miami Beach and elsewhere in the world. patterns,predominantly in the South Beach and North Beach neighborhoods, this document,that elevation is set at+3.7feet.As these modifications come on- _ are not readily conducive to planting suet trees without the employment of line,it is important to recognize the impact these physical changes will have on ', ' • substantial design and the use of green infrastructure,balanced with traditional Cres;conversely,it is also important to recognize the impact olan established 'i ar. grey infrastructure. Particularly to these two areas,the complete utilization of tree asa fixed elevation point around which thestreetscape improvements need G "', the public right of way for the accommodation of vehicular transit,parking,and to be designed if the goal is to preserve as many trees as possible. As such,in at times hike Ian VS leaves space for minimum pedestrian sidewalks. Currently, the interim(between the time trees are planted and the roadway is raised,if the - ... r= as it sweets,the majority of the public right of ways in the North Beach area are trees are planted first,then they should be planted in a manner that anticipates -. only 50-teet wide,while the ones in the South Beach area are either 55-feet wide the raising of the street and its ability to be adaptive. ' (tor west-east streets)or 1,5-feet wide(liar north-south streets).Specific to the accommodation of urban trees within the limited available public right of ways, Because of all of the aforementioned reasons, coupled with the fact that un-compacted soils and space fur tree-root growth is minimal at best,am;fur adapting to sea level rise is in itselfan adaptive process that is chasing a moving the most part,simply non-existing,but the challenges and competitiveness for target(ars forecasts for how ouch rise the sea levels will have varies on who • ;a yy ■•; • • ,titi O6 Y . 1 .•+i - i ♦ - ... i . . • 1 . r ' � i •1 . Ur• ti .r--n�7�f� .7Mt+ Cti •.• f1 'r, _ `. i` . . . ..„ ..:•,_ ,• a • .. ,,,,. • - --,.-, •-, . - ,-. ....„ ..,:.7.4..-fs ..„, . .. . J.,-,-..,,. . • _ • • • „...,„. ____.,,..,•- ..,.. ..., •..,,,...-_,,...• . -,•,:7. ,-,-,,,. .. ... -\ - - . • ,.. •_.„ ,, ,• -. -. . . r -‘,. . 1 , ,r• .•;1• ,, „J..; , ,- ,„,„„. . . . •,, ..•-:.• ..... . . , ,•• ... ...._ ,._... , ........_ _ ... _ • 111 J„ -. .... _ --. - — .. . • t �ri�. 1•, :y y^^ til R”• �. D. • '- - - , tea • 1 `� t / • f ytr,4r,�';. /r 1j, ra - •i •� f 1t .\ yam`:. /"• „� •tt�I - " vr, t�` 7� ts ' y�U}- ':eve. • msr- ✓-- ,e"_'*``-,� ,- . y-..b. I-. (4.- -t. ! t/ ,-,, f r . 1 � tL.; " -ice • °- �. • .1 ,r i 'i i If#Jrn; €\ •-r.' :•:'''- i'. l:l tom} •J 'r.+ rf`e ... a..' ax f4 ••-• ! Yy --` fi X o A `': • i _; ••.:r ,y. 7 t' , - .m .. • • �. - - _ �T . v• �.A.:,1 �,. t f„y tits /! fc'_' urn .ice " t7-": ".• �n"" -,� i4 .� `, .i.r~-'^• - 'n :,-:7..1...."..'A4'.!:::: .lh " ` ` 4 �� ff`��. \ '7•5:-.-7.-...,----J-1.• r < a .. i' ., • • '• L. •' t �• L f* - pr .. JAIL • A3..: I •,' • ` t r AN OVERVIEW OF CONSIDERATIONS FOR ADEQUATE TREE SPECIE • 'I' j019.,.:'•t�' • 1 SELECTION • a •• ,♦ ! j The election of a specific tree species or type for use Assuch,the predominant landscape habitatthat should •I - in any given location should he driven by a series serve as a licundatiun for the tree species palette is that S � - •f of considerations that the receptor location poses of the Sub-tropical Maritime Hammock,whose canopy >' ► ,,r The different considerations need to weigh against is predominantly made up of oaks, gumbo limbos, ,� - t" XI. ,; \< ' each other w determine what is count important for mangroves, buttonwoods, and several palm species. •,i,'!" that location for that given situation. As such, it is Secondary to the Sub-tropical Maritime Hammock, ` u ' important to note at this juncture that no tree will where the density of the built urban environment ' �.''144 be the"most"perfect fit for any given site.but rubor affords proper shielding and protection against the L� �p R ll 01111k **Ir.- �--•:. 't' • its selection should be a compromise of the various more extreme of the barrier island conditions, are • Tom'" y'� y ;' _` y priorities challenging the subject location. Taking into vegetation that typically grow within the Sub-tropical '- /. account these various issues at the time of selecting Pine Rockhuids with its more expansive palette of trees 1' 0 " , -�:,,, specie will increase the trees ability to adapt to the and palms. ;,1111 _ sr1•416111L. -•r. City's urbanized qualities. .. - s Lastly,trees and palms native to Florida will provide ^J 'gi Miami Beach,different to other areas in Miami-Dade the greatest chance of establishment and long- _ is harrier nd. es of ant rvvahwe - „e changeCounty,conate into beislaing,theAs currenttheffect conditions climthatet proteminentsuil luridbility::,-friendlyoevr,species thisshould thatnot arediscard well• are predominantly Mond on the seaward edge of adapted and well-suited to these conditions. It •Yom, the City may soon be the baseline climatic condition is unportain to note that as climate change, and • _ _ i • Y y experienced throughout the entire island community. specifically global warming [modifies the historic a. - ; • Therefore, it is important to look to nature and to boundaries-between tropic and soh-tropical areas,a i 1 `„ j. • identity what natural landscape habitats have evolved greater access to potential species may be granted in • • to deal with this type of environment,characterized by the years to come. ' �.t...,• • a high exposure of salinity in the ocean breeze, �' ��•,� - It *.t •.' • a high resin content in its trunk and branch wood This Tool-kit takes into account a broad range of •* +f ' , to resist the perseverant and constant wind species from current Sub-tropical habitats around i.. - ♦ ' patterns typical of a barrier island, the world and Caribbean areas that are commercially isp'r" ; the ability to tolerate degrees of salinity in its available for consideration in their use throughout the 41r; - • • groundwater, City. Additionally,we have included species that are •• • ' 0, • drought tolerance and the ability to grow in areas either Florida-friendly or appropriate titr the City but '"" y ' ul'extreme heat and high sun-exposure, not comercially available-the latter of which the City •a-.. " • the ability to sustain short bursts of saltwater may consider to cmltract-grow. y inundation that can result from occasional storm :'' - •y surges,and the ability to grow in areas with medium to[minimal .., • ' soil volumes. Page 991 of T576 '..we 55m n•ti lid.1 u,ne f:rtlrr,.a and M..!rc n,, 67 CRITERIA AFFECTING ADAPTABILITY AND RESILIENCE IN • �' -�` \� ! 4 •. '4 URBAN CONDITIONS p, .iiIiiiiIIIillir ^ . .�Ig ,' • w " In developing the Muster Tree and Palm Yolette last for the ' ' Z -e; . k . y r M W City's urban forest,a series of criteria were considered "' ' • when narrowing down the selections. 'These take into �-^ ----• r ' ,,„ account several of the factors needed to ensure that • • I i—.–' 1 1" +4'� '• t1° j • Aie4" selected trees and palms inherently have a better chance ',� ` .• • I I�.–� I �. I 6 I. r Y r... of surviving within the densely turban qualities of Miami = • +1 Reach. The rationale is that by Cruising on these more f S '• i extreme conditions in the City, a list can he arrived at - . ' y q• tr 1* that can serve both the areas of highest constraints (as ill 44 _ - - , ,• ti� 1 f_`, ,' the North Reach and South Reade nu lti•hunily:ureas and7. _ . the commercial and hotel use corridors)as well as those 1, • ✓ ` areas more forgiving to the growth of trees(single-family ''s • Drought and Urban Heat Island Tolerance Leal or Fruit Litter home use areas and the residential islands). As such,it is This measure for drought tolerance is based on the There is uo such thing as a litter-tree tree or palms. They important that this list be re-visited every time the plan !aa characteristics exhibited by the tree/palet at maturity,as will either shed leaves/fronds.fruit or flowers depending gets updated to either add or removed selected species . • plants generally require less water once est-tblished and on its seasonal growth cycle. Large fleshy flowers or based on availability or perlin'mance,respectively. A. adapted to their planted location. Additionally, a high fruits that are numerous,excessively woody or which had A matrix has been prepared to index several of these degree of an urban heat island elfect will exacerbate the thick flesh can particularly he concerning if planted over evaporation iii moisture content within the soil and will designated pedestrian areas. criteria and score the themes of consideration in order to create pseudo-drought-like conditions within built-out ascertain what species are best adapted to urban qualities. - areas. These themes include the lidlowing list that represents the - highest priorities of characteristics for survivability and . • • ' ' I ' . areas of the City.'this is assuming that every effort is made climate change resilience specific to Miami!Beach s barrier tel provide the trees and palms with adequate volumes of . ,•„ . :'I•.'I C. ...... .I:I I I I.i...1...I. l I.. island condition. soils fur proper root growth,art,regularly irrigated•and are _ properly maintained. A high score does not immediately . ty � I. l)ruiught and Urban I lent Island'l'olerunce reran that any specific specie is the most prelerred 94 , 'L. Leaf or Fruit Litter specie election him•any given situation. Addrumnol design `– - 3. Maintenance Requiredconsiderations need to be made to finally hone in an the " 4. Overall Longevityr M- 'i •S�'_ 5. Resilience to Relocation appropriate specie and •size specifications selection.These 6• `ser ..t , are further discussed in the next section of this chapter. `wg,- 44–d 1 r z T ,, a .� 6. Root System Characteristics r > _. ►' �' 7. Salt Tolerance :�\ tY,''' � • The matrix is mit intended to he a vehicle t0 assume that • , H. Shade Cast 1j 9. Storm and high-Wind'I'uleranc' corners can be cut at the time nl'adaquately planning for 10.Tolerance and [o Crown-Raising future improvements. For example: if a specific specie I�. ranks high in drought tolerance and in its root system + 44— characteristics, it does not mean that minimal planting r. ''"""'� ` For each of the above-reli•reneed characteristics,a score ` has been assigned corresponding to its performance in areas with low soil volumes can be used to save reonty. ;: each category.A value has been assigned,ranging between Finally an acknowledgement needs to be made that the Maintenance Requirements Overall Longevity and Life span 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), that hest describes how that There is no such thing as a maintenance-Ii cc tree or paler Continuity of the urban canopy and a maximization of the species hest suited for consideration should be Florida specific specie generally pti forms. All scores are then Friendly and Florida Native species. Among tltent, the howeverdiilerentspecieswill require diffet'entmaintena ace potential benefits that trees provide air best manifested in added together to determine an overall score with a highest regimes,either in the form of fruit removal,frond removal, mature and established trees. This metric nteasuurs the following considerations should be observed: possible cumulative point value of 50. the need to thin out dense canopies or root control. 'Trees life-span of the specie's when planted in an urban context, • Species hest-suited to beachGont exposure and the relentless salt spray will inevitably require higher levels of maintenance when assuming appropriate standards of cure are administered 'Fhe overall scores torr each species are then expressed as •. Species that have a proven track-record of growing to younger until they are trained and established to meet the including watering.fertilization,corrective priming,etc. a Percentage of Likelinessaf Adaptability arid Resilience. needs/design criteria of their unique placement. . . a: i i.h. •I.I•. - I il,.••..II :rte severe,inhospitable urban environments • Species that relocate and transplant well I. I I. r• I. It is important to mute that these scores only serve to identity the likeliness of any given specie to survive sonic ' Species that can tolerate Nil holly in the groundwater ,i` ..,i...,, ��,. I�..i- :I I,. I' I.�I I .I... I •I„.r •.r••r r'I."• r , t,. ,.. of the harsh growing conditions in the more densely urban u s ::Ito ai Miami lira,:t: Page 992 of 1576 11r6s1:obese M1M.l>trr Plat:2C2a • 0,4 te1 t §- : ':7 • • ,tiI Resilience to Relocation Root System Characteristics Storm and High-Wind Tolerance Given a sandy substrate or urban over-compacted soils, This is a measure of how problematic the specie's root can I ligh wind events are a standard in South Florida.Assuming sante species will relocate better than others. This is due be,assuming adequate planting standards are met with a a satislactory rout growth is established,this metric rates to the rapid percolation of water in the existing substrate reasonable soil volume for growth. Of great consideration each specie's susceptibility to being toppled-over by wind or the inability fur specific root systems to re-anchor in is the impact roots have on adjacent hardscape investments, gusts or to branch and limb breakage. Trees with a lower a reasonable amount of time where they don't become a he they pedestrian walkways, pedestrian-use areas, rating may be best-suited for park areas and open space -„ target liability of concern. For the most part,small trees roadways,underground utilities,building foundations,and areas,whereas species with a high rating are hest-suited and palms will relocate hotter than shade and large canopy grey drainage infrastructure. for highly tralhickcd or Liii nsited areas,or areas rear critical trees infrastructure. r .I•r,•. I .. •.I I m.... ,, it I��'u.:. . �u l 1. .. II:,I i'. {1 A - -::..,-,1,,,,--.-.,., y.' - .. - �`, r t qty. 6 } ` I � r 1 y _ •i 41( .1 . nt r •G. T. , 1 J' 'r Jy� 1 . L � 111. F v- ' ' laW i` . - � •f - l , ,f• '` Salt Tolerance Shade Casted Tolerance to Crown-Raising -. Becauseof Mionu Beacli s unobstructed exposure to salt- The ability for any given specie w curtail against the Because Miami Brach is predominantly an urbanized,built- 1 • . � f ltd sprmypamcticul:iilyonthe seaward-side of the barrier island, heat island effector to promote pedestrian walkability is out context and lrecausethe nrajorityolthe publicly-owned u y • each specie's ability to tolerate exposure to salt is a critical directly related to how densely shaded its canopy can be. urban forest will inhabit public right ofways,itis important I •-.,y metric for consideration. As climate change increases the While palms will cast more shade the lower the canopy is to consider howw•ell a tree can be pruned to meet clearance .-' _''N., .`• salinity of Biscayne Bay,areas on the western sides of the to the ground,as they grow the shade that tlwy cast tan be requirements for pedestrians, vehicles, visibility, or for . . island that today experience reduced amounts of salinity ratherrathernegligible(unless they're clustered in groups). As CPTEII. This metric rates the specie's ability to achieve the : '' .. exposure are expected to see an increase in salt exposure. such,palms are all rated with the score of I. necessary clear trunk to meet these urban considerations. ' i i ' .,. , I ��.• .,II. ... i Ir.l .. ,. I .. .I I,:I. .,1. , I .., I:. U. r ...61 I , ., \.,-- !r 4 e 7 .,! ,• 4 wr Yui I • .` 1 1.- 99 yr lI 1/ 11, age 93o115/6 lyban[.uugnTuaut' rn•S.,Yu,S,ie,lm,ac i.rm,rrd.IndMalin•s WI SPATIAL DESIGN CRITERIA AFFECTING TREES IN URBAN CONDITIONS While the Likeliness of Adaptability and Resilience Index and light(FPL)has carte blanche permissions to"storm- Soil Saturation and Temporary Inundation Tolerance categories help to identify an overall list of appropriate it should be noted that where trees are planted in a cluster prune"trees. This"preparedness strategy"results in the King tides,torrential rain events mitt temporary 'landing species For the Miami Beach context, further design or in a continuous planting strip.the recommended soil severe pruning of the tree's canopy into what is commonly due to storm surges are ail considerations that need considerations need to be taken into account at the time volume can be shared between trees at a rteof50 percent, known as V-notching the canopy. While this may prevent to be taken into account when selecting the correct of selecting a specific specie for any given location. These provided that the soil is uncourpacted and is properly the immediate conflict between branches asci powerlines, tree for any given]oration. Luckily,trees typical of the are design considerations that any given hired design amended. the pruning methods puts into severe question the ability Maritime Hammock are well-suited and adapted to these professional would factor in when making decisions about of the tree to survive storms all-together,because they are temporal.momentary conditions. 'fees with a rmpant, specie election. These are expanded as follows: It is also critical to note that typical organic soil depths in generally left unbalanced and structurally weaker. interconnected network of roots will structurally be able Miami Beach tend to he shallow,generally not exceeding a to stay upright when soils get overly saturated and its Canopy Growth Area Clearances depth of 24 to 30 inches. As such excavating tree pits to a lnthe spirit ofpreventinn,F1'Lhas published its"Right Tree, cohesion is compromised.Optimally,trees that can sustain When building sethacks are minimal and when buildings minimum of 36 inches and requiring an average planting Right Place"list.that categorizes tree species according to short periods of over-saturation in the soil will also have a exceed 2 stories in height,considerations need to he made soil depth of 30 inches should be the targeted norm. the minimum proximity it may have to overhead wires. tendency to sustain areas of higher soil compaction. When as to what specie would be less impacted by the limitation Designers,Engineers and Home Owners are encouraged to utilizing soil cell systems to provide ample root growing of clear space for the canopy to spread in a balanced Growth Habit and-Form refer to the latest edition of this list as a design election areas, designers and engineers need to incorporate and even form. When the canopy of trees grows in an Trees that can naturally grow with a single trunk (also tool when specifyinga particular tree or palm specie when embedded infrastructure that will aide the release of unbalanced form,they are more likely to be structurally known as a 'Standard'growth pattern)are preferred in overhead wires are present. excess tluids so the system doesn't become•a waterlogged unsound and increase their chances of falling over Ina high urban contexts, particularly where trees need to share container: wind er prolonged over saturated event. constrained spaces with pedestrians, commercial uses. Shade Tolerance and the need to accommodate sight clearance triangles As development occurs and more and noire properties Dimensional Planting Root Area for sightlines. Smaller trees that typically grow with a maximize the development potentials of any given site, Providing adequate area fur healthy root growth to occur multi-trunk form can sometimes he formed to provide the increasingly tees may he planted in areas where they are is vital,not only to the long-term survivahility of the tree necessary clearances as well. Additionally,tees that have obscured from direct sunlight by the shadows that are or palms,-but also to ensure its structural soundness to a horizontal spreading quality to their canopy will provide being casted by the buildings. Because most tree species combat the adverse conditions of a high-wind event. This the most ample shade and will be the best suited for require full sun exposure,areas that are densely shaded does not preclude that at large tree cannot he planted in a minimizing the heat island effects of asphalt and sidewalk by edifrcations may not he suitable for all species. The small space,provided that the space is amended with the areas overly exposed to solar radiation. selection of the appropriate specie to tolerate either full correct type of green infrastructure thin will sustain its shade. partial shade or lull sun conditions needs to be - survival. As suc•li,a determination needs to be made on Habitat-Supporting Species taken into account. 'this is particularly true to landscape a case-by-case basis as to what the specific needs are for One of the goals of the City of Miami Beach is to provide buff'erareasbetween properties cwill alleyways and service - .. • each selected tree for the specifics of each location. ample canopy specie diversity to sustain the local habitats corridors. For street trees connecting north to south, see of birds and other species of the area. '''his is of vital partial shade conditions can be observed in areas flanked ' �il i More often than not,because of its densely urban quality, impurtance,because as the effects of sea level rise occur,a on both sides by buildings in excess of 4 stories,such as e the use of soil cells and/or pavement suspension systems potential loss of low-lying areas may be seen As a result, segments of Collins and Washington Avenues. For streets Sit will need to he employed and should be accounted for the remaining canopy circus in the adapted portions of the connecting east to west,shade patterns are seasonal,with a , early on in the process of budget and use determination. city will become vitally significant to the survivability of the smith side of the sweets being in complete shade for 1'r According the University of Florida, the following are those species. the entirety of the day. Similarly, these conditions are • * derived standards for uncompacted soil needs capable of most visible in areas where buildings 4stories or inure are . -. promoting good root growth. They developed these while Overhead Utilities present.such us on 41st Street and the streets with more • assessing post-hurricane conditions for adequate soil Beyond soils being overly-compacted, the second most densely developed areas of multistory buildings stretching volumes per tree that increases the chances of the trees' significant challenge in Miami Beach to a robust urban tree between Washington Ave and Collins Ave in South Beach, , ^'' t survivability. canopy is the presence of overhead utility lines. 'these Indian Creek Drive and Collins Avenue in Mid Beach,and I '0 • Small Trees(heights shorter than 30 legit at maturity) are not limited to powerlines alone,but also feed services along 71st Street in North Beach. ' require it minimum of 9.3 cubic yards of root growth such as telephone,cable and interuet to the various homes area per tree and buildings throughout the Iaty. The predominant • Medium 'Imes (heights between 31 to 50 feet at mnsiderttion is the election of tree species that will nut maturity)require a minimum of37 cubic yards of root conflict with the overhead wires. First,the entanglement growth area per tree of tree branches and powerlines make those powerlines • Large Trees(heights above 51 feet at maturity)require more susceptible to rupture if a nee branch,in a high wind a minimum of 83 cubic yards of root growth area per event,snaps the wires. For this reason and under the tree rationale of preventing security concerns,Florida Power 70 city of Mimai[leach Page 994 of 1576 tldi.in Pen-,i hLi for Pio m'.'.n ZU • ��• �r j r lit: •V _ .. .,. 'Q • — ..' c .��. . :. �.. .moi► \ 1 mss-•.. • 'like','*-1'... T • 1j -1, s - •IN. }' a a'7 ...*7.k .. • • R. fi —•,,..7.1,.„,sL t?7',ry �?- 3C; ,,,,,,..„,•:, •l �;i.Y i ` 41 0• „Ail li,,, , • f ,. • 4( fC IL,. • • J , } t +` ,pti fir, • — S . 4 I' A 4101V l • 1 , �• •• y , ,• .• , ,.• l'il IVI-Tr,•4 4,., :• '' . i•• . ,fk, , . . ,,-.•# • - . ,. .t , . , • _ m•..- 1...: '.,-:-..--4. • - • .. i, •:',;•:•SA, • .•-.,'. ...... •,,r'..'.-„•_",:',. !T .••'i •• " . , . ♦ ,` k 7T .' ' , '' •11,3::::::0..., . '. . ( 4 ' n .. /y'. '� .A...• ,•' 1 OM1.. ' ♦J5/• ', ../.1: •INA * ^� .4 ; , ` • , l !• . • f t 1T•,. . .i'Y t .y • c.) ,.._ Iii, ..... , ,. . . . , _ . ', ....... _ , • .ce. i ,... • • _ it . . . 1m . • .81, \.. -' '''' . AsNa. •,• '- ' �. �:;=: } : . tip. . . '� L " 1 W., 1 ,`fir •% �' ! ;'." �` '' t s • r ° a r c1 k t g s. s7 -: g g a v � a 6 =F s I er 1 28 '2F e = E' F E 4 a aF x 3I r $ € E 8 s shi xa - t L N. t 5 "X a .s 8 - .a r `^ F 5. j 1 Acetru6rum 1�3 5 2 T 3 3 i T 3 3 5 1 5 3 Y Y N 24 RpNia pinnoto l I 1 3 r 3 l 1 I 5 ] 5 1 3 25 N Nr Y Nerd Maple [- �._. i .._._.I�-1. -_' --�_.....��_ �_ [:..� 5wgi8e hM I::.:.. _:1.._......_.-T_:-�::1 r---.-- .[: -[ __ _ ® 2 Burido fwcems L5?T 3-I 5 ._11 5 ' 51.1. 1 5 .1..'J[ S.�n LN....J [--.NJ ::N _I 35 3o9"0ueensOap.Myrfe [ 3...L3.I.3 3._.. . ..I__I I 3 1..."1..3.I._.3.� i_ 3_1[ 1 L N_...l I N 1 [ r.J Bleck Oliver L _ 3 Bvinnia ptbarwaamd [..S I 3�--1 2`..;IS I I 3_�.3_I 3 f-3i r31,I 1 �_y, [ NJ '__Y_� 26 LysRamvlahWednT ,_Yd 1•5--f-5 _5 5 • l l 3 [ 5 • 5 _L . I 9 I-3 47-I 85% ry I I Y� [..Y1 _I 1I i_ I 111 1111 4 Bunerc simgrabo I. 1- I-5 3 _5-1-3 ._.5 15__-I-_-_5. 3__1 J[47__1® Y L_ l t_Y_.i 27 Mapnohuprvndilb&ancluNMtenolla rcr [. 3 I i-I 5_.L3. 1 3..I._3 I 5...1..3 I. .5_I.._T1 [._39_l® -_..I [_r i I_..Y. 1 Gumbo limbo _1 -L _ _ _ _ - __ _ _ �7' T 1I I I I .. I 5 CalopvNumbmriliense C.3......r 3 •S r-3-,T--3 3-1 5 5 5..__51 3_J [ 93 178% LN 1 I_NJ I i' J 28 MopnSr ay M+01Mb [..'T.3 I . -- .._3 3..3r1=-1-r-3-1- 1T.3 I 3�3 _..S...I 2fi Q% r_N [ Y 1 I..N Ma9lan Maury4al ... I ` 1-. l _ __ 6 CossiaJhevb 3 3 5 3 3 3 S 1 5 3 33, Y N Y zg Mangifem indh7o 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 _ 1 5 3 31 5616 I cdrkn Sharer L:: 1.-.T--[._.__.[-_.::[_.:..L_..L- i_, [-„ Jr] 1---1 [_j :_.__.J Marren [-�.-- 1 1--. I:�_ _I .�:: ...� C....I I� [:N ..._ _ 1 Manipmo mppto • r- l 7 C] i pmndis 5 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 72 58% N N -_r 30 S 1 3 " 1315 3 3 5 5 3 5 3 39 71% N Y 9e [--.....----I 1 -----I .I.._._.1.._•::.�L._ I�� [: 1 _ 11 Sapodilla C_.__ I.._`�7��... ._. l.___.:I:--,I..._ I- -------.I �.._.JI _. J{f r--;-„i_.--- [.---_ rfro 8 ►ppk Gl°fsoln Sharer C.5'��3 ..I. 3-I 2_.....I 3 3-I_3 3 I 3.� ; [ [ 32._® C-J I..NJ r Y.1 33 GO...LTeatnutTrce [_5 ;.1. 3.--1-;...t... I�.3. 1 3._l. 3 I_.�3�� I 3j_I 61M LN_1 [.N 1 H i • Ceiba pencondro 7 ' '7 pMopharum lkerotarpum Ti- 1 9 kapok Tres [5�.SI 5 1 [ = 1 3 S l: 5 _][�l! 67% [ N J N I 32 pod Tree [ 5_.. 1 3 3 .._ 11 3 3..I 1 1 5 -1-1 29 SM N N [_N J 511k Ross Tree [..._.5! 3 -51--2-1.3 1 L3_L31- 1 j_3.I_ 1�3.1.� [3?]® I N I [ N I I N 33 Red B9, [..5. s-1 5 I 3 I 3� 3.. 1..3 I_.3.I__5 5 5 a) OS% I V V r 7 1 Ceiba sprsbav I L 1 -J r 7 i'ersiv Dvrbonla 11 Chrysgphyfum coin[° 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 • 5 3 5 3 39 N N 34 Anus einohi'rpr dtnao" 5 3 5 5 1 I 5 3 3 5 1 3/ 671{ V T N Star Apple 1_...:T�IL •-:::._..T__... .�__...I--___1- _J [_. :::® C._-: 1...„.7] [. 1 South Florida AM Pint 1 _ 1 1--- I..__ _I `+�j��' 3��I �1 _-I Cr Irk_; 12 Cocc°!p&8V Iseaerape [.. 5 I 3 I 3 5 1-_3 I 3 .5 I 3 I...3 13 [�. _ f�35:[I 5..I I N rY I 35 Pod WetplN pciohtlo[arWs [_3..I._.5 [ 3_T..S�_1 [ 3..I 3 3 I 1_7 J I 3T I fi7% I N� I Nl l�Y. 1 13 Ctt[oo purrrapt [_9 • 3_..1. 5_..I_5:.�_3.L.3 5-L_3_! 5 1._...3 1 LS9 71% H . [ V__] j �.YI 36 pvyvhnm brrgVono Mari Tree [.Ste.5_I. .�3.t _71.3_[.3__ 1 1�_..3 3 35� fi{% LN.I I_N [-�....� ConMatpva e/ectN 1 -- _ .. •_ 1� I - I Quercus unginfoncr 1' •••��] '1 I-- - 1 14 Green eatton.00d [. 5..._..S_. 5__I 5I_.9 5 1.533 ` -17 =I BS%] I 7 •1 I Y V I 37 Om Oak I 51-3 I 3..I..5 5 1 3 I 3 I ..5�-5 I�S f 5 I f 49 I B9% Y_ [..Y ' Y� ..�_...r r _ r -_.1 r ---111 r Pelona 15 NatalegiaPdntlarla [ 5 1_l__3.-- 3-. 3,-- 1 5 : 5 J 1 1_5..._ 3� I-35- 66% [ N I 1_N1 38 Qvvrcus',arum.NIRh Rife sibs Oall I 5_.-2 -3 -I...5 _ 5 1 _3.I.5 5 I _S - i.._.___1491"89% I Y.. [. Y I Y I 16 D7ospyr°s dlR3wYY Sapate C;.J_.,. 1 .I._.53 2 i.__j� 3 l..r_5 [3 LS ► � `[ 3° ® L-N [ J ....N:� 39 So7ind 0h7d115wpkerrp [_5 I 3 I.5T1 I-3'113 .1I 5. ! 3 [ 1 1--3 -[-.3._J 71 67% 1 N [ 1I [L.N ; 27 Daapyms virgiroane 3 1 1 3 3 3 1 • 3 S 3 71 I N Y Siderwyfan fathduumum T l I1�, I M1Mmmon [_ .__L�,I. ._1._ _..i__-�1T .�_[--. ......I1 L..._-I® flu Lei LN I 40 Nhe Mutlt -5 3 I.5 I 5_.I 3 I.3 I 5 5.��1 5...-�1 `<�JI® L.." 1.... .J [_7J 18 Flatocorpus detipifm [ 5�I- 5I3�--3 I 331'3I13 I 3 3 [79 71% 1 Y-1 ['N� V1 41 Sima/°°Daw�uTl� I 5- 5 1--3 1T 5 11 11 1 I 5�3 [u5.1.•3 [ 3_I F41J Y [-� [ T lepanne Blueberry 1 fr 1 19 Frythnnp crhlo polll I '� ' [ 3 3-L.3_.CI_.I. 3_L] 3 L.� I..13� l_N-r. [.� L..N I 12 Spvth°dN C�hkM°Tu1lp Tree [ 5 ; 3 [ 5 3...I..._3- .L3..L 1 T3 I 3i i__35][1 , N.... 121 [..N . Cxkfpur Coral Tree 6aa15eo pankvbro 5014tenia mohagont 20 Wwoad C 3_ S I S 13 3 3 I 3 3 5 -3 3 39 •17_ 71% N V --N 43 mow.Y 5--- 1111- 5 3 3-- -5 . 5 3 5 51 43 _78% Y y [ V Acus gusto '7`I�'.- --- ..�_ _ 1I - 7amariredus indrea ' - 1 [I •--`1I 21 Stnrykr Fl8 [ .5 I 3 I. 3-.L._._I_ 5_ 3.I 3_1_5_ I._3 5 1.__.� C.41 I 75%1 [ Y_1 [ Y1Y_._I 44 Indian Tamarind Tree C.S�1 I 3 S.L 3_�.3 1 3 5.�_5 L.5 1_.J I 43_11:1:1 ® N.. [ [ Y� ....... _ - ... Toaodium mrendenr -_ ..• ._1. 'r- .5-1 _l 1._. Ficus eihifuna 11_1 r -'J r {I I �1 22 Shornleaf FIR [ 5 �5 1 5 5 I 1 I l ' 5 I 3 I 5 3 ' I 43_ 7B% [ Y : I .Y� _ Y I 45 /o. Cypress I 5. - 5 .I 3 [ 5... 1 I 1 [ 3-1 3 1 5 l 3..__5 . 39 J 7l% Y.� [ r Y.I L .l _T__ 1.. ..__11,1 .. _ .__ ._. - ^_'_ ,..1____ _ locorvnao mimoarJoNa T, ''""7�I'`` rr �}I Ir 7baodum dinimum I 23 Jaawnda 3 2_ ..3 3 I-1 I 3 I-1 fL 5.�_� 3U 1:111 ® N I I.2-1 [ 21 _1 N.I 96 ..gprns C.5_1_5_ -3. .5_.[._�1 1..13. I 5-1 LII I..3A I® L.Y. _ L L rJ Ilrhbu Canopy•'anil:clh P990 907 01 1'v/ii ':tura 5prrius')a.11,:it)ns Crpr•rhr anJ NU lrkes Ti • it r a rq r ; t F 2 . s r ,1 I IV_ y Y Y E j Y - - r r - ° � 6 t ¢ C f2,4 3 i �. 5 I a 3 x _ i ,12' �� a `a a 2� _ - a o a ` A .y - - i iI ai k I • rI I -I 1 Avirennro permnansBl•d3l mangrove LH 1:5.1._:5__1 5. L3.._.-i.._..5. 13 .151i1511_ : ::37.:] 6 l N� _.r_] I. N.I 13 p°t#onvrXnw Pine �..5 1.3::. 5 .1._5_1 1 I.I. 5 I 1 __3_i l >`;__. L33�.. LE I__N..I I_Y.1 2 13.1dia harms'Shady lady' r---, 3 3 3 5 3 5 3 3 5 1 39 71% N N Y 14 p+sddla pfsnpvfa 5 3 5 5 3T31- 3 5 3 1 3 3 5 1 43 78% H H Y Shady lady Bleck Clive _T -l:-.._- ...._11_ [ _.I-_.1_=.__� _ L._ 1[^] 1__] _ l f-� 3•m•Ia Baawaae [�.-L_ - 1._...r--�7,_.L.:_:..__I ___. . ._' L.. J T _ 1 7I 3 Cvesefpime pranaddlo 3 1-7,j 3... 3� 3 I3 3 I 3 1 3 3 3 ] [.33 l� N I �J 1. Y 25 i0dalarpas mv[svphYllus : 3 L.5._._3 I 51 3 I ] 1.3 1 1 5 [-1.-1-3 H 64% Y [.N..1 _.Y-I erMal•M Tree ll r•.vaaae.pa. L _ _ 4 Cnrysvp2ryllum a4viJ°rme 5 1 3 _ 3 3 1_3 135. I.31:.5_ 3_1�51141 1 75% - Y 1 __Y_11 • 26 Ahi.oYnao npteW� 3 [_5 - 5 _ 5- .1-._1. .1 5 1 3 - 5_�1 5 1 39 71% Y L Yi N 1 Main land TIM 1 1 ,_ I 5 Gthvrr.yium Jrpl i tlA•waod 5 5 S r i 3 5 5 3 3 1 3 al 15x V Y Y 27 3:dna.y+on 3ohnJd+°m • 5 5 5 • 3 3 3 3 3 ,-3 3 3 39 • 71% N Y Y _ 1 -1 1 � I I _. i_- 1 [_- ll 1 1 L-_1 [. Willow Bostic 1 : -1 [_- .I. 1_ C J �_..] ramI Ir - 1I 7abrha,a[n,Kp[ri0p Ir (f - 6 Clusnr vild3Appk ��51_s..L 5..1.::5:1._3T- 5,1 3_L 5 1__3. I.._3.[ [.43 1 ]8x [r_NJ [Y] 1Y1 28 Gallon Trumpet Tree L5 L3 1 1 1 I._3_ ...5 I 3..I 3 [.1.1._3___[_-'.._J [18 1 51% LN- LN._1 I. Y.1 Cvccelabu divrnl uo I I r Tabrtruio Ar[nophyllo 7 ID 1---;-] 5 5 3 3 3 S 3 5 3 43 T Y Y 29 5 1 3 3 5 3 5 3 1i 3 3 15 64% N N 1 • 1 r l ._ � 1L._.L _._� L_�® � � -1 1 1 pid[Trumpet Tree L... Pippop�n 8 Crtuenticc lett 3T 3 13. -..3�3 5 3_.1.3 1. 3' 3 3 1 I-33 1 N N N CalaNthTme J 4 orro 9 f)ryperrs lvrG lJrrtar4 Allan 5 1 3 1 5...._3 L3 1 5 3 1 3 1__5 3 1 3] 1.41_-1® N I Y] 1__V._. 10 U'yptlesdhn3JOhv 5 3 [ 5 1 _1 I 3_L51...3_L 3 .1_5 I 1 L 41 1 15%t •...N� 1 . [_r._ MBthad 1 L T I Ir i 11 Ficus rvbr/enol L3 1 5�::3 I 5 [3 3..A_3 1 3._[._3_]_.-3..1'31 L39]® [ N 1 LN_] [ Y Busty U•7 fl/ gnUpm droplrns - -l.. --- _ l Ir l Il Meanie Fon Tree L.S�._5...-1-_5_.. 3....I.3 3 3 L.S.I. .3_.-3 I 1 L39]® 1� L N_-I 1_Y._ 13 Frangipani r 5 1_.' 1_ 5 ^i:1. �_..,i 3.1 1__ .1_.I.�..1[:15.I[-[ Ni"__ �N 1 1 N plu mla sp. I `- • 1 14 933Prrodn<oior WAY -5 _L �. 5 _ 5 L 3-_5 5 1 3 1 3 . 3 3 I [45.1`IN% -N1 I -Y J 1. Y 15 G oph3lonp'JWm ._5]._.5...1.5 .F1 3 5 I 5 13 1 3 1 3 _LI 45]1 I W L v.] 1.VI lona4aat Blollr 16 t/comm. 51.3=151__;_1:.-3-1-5-1_ _=5_[ . 15 L3 .L11-'5-11:1_ Di L__ _Y B.rwon Na11Y 1 _ 17 Rrr3roKn...Nsal, I 5 �5L 3: 1.._5 [31_51..5 1 3 11 3i- -F-1 1 1.43.1® LN] LV 1 1 r 18 KrlpiadlMron(ertum 5--_.51 5 _._3 1 3 1 5 - 5131 1.5 ....31' 3'1 1 45 1 a2%3 .- I . -Y-1 r Y.1 L.Y-_ . Wadi Ironwood 19 lopurrvbno rorrmosv S S 1.5 __..5._] 3 1�,, 3 1-5_-:-'=L5_J [. 37.] 1M -I:1-1 -N 1 --;.:1 ] [ N - MOM Mangrove 2B tys7lvmvspDKu 5 5 3 5 5 L5 1 3 1 1 5 l 41 75x N Y Y fable :__ ]�:-_L 3.. _..._-[•-:-__.:-ii-I..."---1------ ii LJ_ �_ L_:... if _ 21 Mar Rad Mulberry L5.-._1. 1 1 1 S rubro i 313 .-J-1_[.3 1-3 1 3 1 5] [_29 [® I 9] V. I L N_J Nomnhla[margin I rI 22 Madal+144101he L 5 1 5.1 5..- 3.L.3_.L3-' 5 l 3 15 3 [ 1 C.3,]® r-j1 ��H I 74 City of Miami I •lid Page 998 or 1576 91111.111];,1,1 Mi1Sicr 1'1:31 lila] w « 2. o e w ., a N . w ti r. c . m .r N N . w w .. a R ti o^ a B i a ° Ea 9 o 1 s g f9 „a s R ' o _g e 3' o s 3= fa o ; s IR f�' a 3 ;' s ` co Ks i`@ a 1 a f a 8 e'_ bz .g 'a Sa la ”i g2 is ,i –1 .. Ca g E ' /1 tg o xi la t. m. ST • c 8 * I E 3 i i s 3~ 1. 1 s s 1 9 1w i 9 a $° �(�{I�"�' I '" 1.:71.171 --7 lI r1—_r'—Um WM one urban Neat FA ,I H ! I[-II.I. 1 4 ! I I I, w i w 1 I-i I N 1 N I N .;r1 1,�, I n4n,a taeranne 4 .. N JI 1 w .n I I tear or[Nat War w III-1I1 .. IIr w ,: I _ ,. . .. . , ,n I•�W I! ,: 'J L11 i N ,' N I an ' au Ian I an I I an I w aril.�I I w i 11 v: I an I an f an i M>In:enanee Requirement, 1I 1 71 4--1. W i . I • i I Ca 'I I' us It sa �. oerallt°ryevryantl 7 ' N1' iiN :1NI' W- W •11� w.-, w .us it ', . '~^•I w1 W W I W .... wL:.anr-,wn p 1;11 N ., N a, iIw ; Iw ,' j I�� 1 1�W L-� ; IvI -J' r^. Raullente,n Re,neatl°n 1_ aa,1 .n 1 ; I' N w 'I ' I N I. v' ', W '{ w t Rad system A,anMernt. ., ;• I w iI 'r III--I N 1 Ili-; .. N ILW 1 11 N 11'" I -; 1i 1:41a I 1 '_I�W it �1 'I= � _ Salt Tc er. e �, HTETH aMF 111. rii. an1lan • an ! Ni`/_ ;I i t' ..�' �.w ) "end_ _ _ .. _ _ ! iea!rance,o hcen.Ramq ' y. N 1 w w _� TOWN.N reedier , -1; it�iL 1 -� i iL=i�l_1��-1 11 it U if i►�i 1' w� wl' a u Iu� �'��Ii�• I� t✓v�i .i � �ll" deal:Yde ux l.n� � �� ' x Ti� 1 xi� �11"1u �uin iNrii:di 5115 I 5 -� aaame,bae ueeM:rce f ¢ w i .:11-., 1 ;11 . 11 !z z .. I, . i.!.-.72 .71r. 11-.7". r .1 -. 11 .11g. 1 , ;I . . z 11.-i. ,Atdi ;mcre 7' 711:_11_' j:--I ' 2 Z!--1. � < < ' 2 2 •G Natne I�L7 ii.JL' in I.`,l 1L' :Li; ` ;I�[ 1LLi ILL ` ;i-1.`iL2i i JL` iI LJ ./.2_. _ ,r,. 1 e !.. 2 1 11▪ 2 ,i' t .• z :I t uran.,reeiereN s w it _ 6 N m ., w t w 2 o N as 2 N a N w w W W w w w w .. ., ., t. •Rfg al ss ` Yo 3R 3 l�' -- yaq i i ?9 F"_ 9'a tt a ct� =55 S. S$ g3 p6 .0 3••g. aA fz ca is a9 }a 4a 3: o .a Z3 30 $ 5g ' `-1 r-1r-1I —t—i7-1,':7-1f,1--,—r—...,.. urtw,Neat iN : ; N •; ,' N W N . N N I,,,,.d,tlenanq 1 N 1 1,.._,, l i W1= i t 1-�' - 1 ,„—[ an i N an1 i N 1 r_�-na 1 n.n. Leafan;run mar AY N _ r.•u:nlnNIC.1.gwremtnq ;-;11 y ; V-1; -' • W 1 1 •' n ~— '• —'O.eral,Nyeriryand N 1 j " 1 j J N j rij ; W I" 1I^ 1 j N lRe.awn ,n .. - I w ,a „ ,• • ' W ,. ' w I i w .. wN .... .Re,aeKetgRe,eeat�n . —I-1 r—rrll.• w ,_— .,--; w., FNI�IFW1I _I Ya 1I1 lkl N ,I L• 11 . LN {{ 1 In I.-. i s Pea..Caaracienttia N • n. .. .. I i N s L.to . I .. ' N ; .. :SaR raeeance ,�. F—`I.—'—l.�.. i . 1--'1 1 _ ' 17-^ " 11 oft en� '�—anyi~ii �t1--I 1_11 _ .- 1tadw 1. w .. . :! _ an W ' W .. r. l „ '. N � an ;1 .. .1ini, N N IN • N I.r''!:::::::Yam.aaa nan.w,d j F •I—I�J I c -.I I1...J I Toeunce to Go°n RaninS °IH !Iw •! ~ I�11IJI 1 T'�w ! 'I � II 'I � w riiw ��- . W • w .. I w :li J`�,I •• 'Tdeuncetor000q :.% 1��,I 1 ti i, �; i�►_; ��i ► � i 11 r i��J�I e i! i i A � N �...II kw. T®0000®oo®E000000nonoAdolaa�n,NRasa..c .. �x x � x x � x t—x--� x xae a� x x x x x x x da,o,.arlr,and Re,.eKe z r¢^^r z z n� . z I�� < 1 z 171-1r---.� . • �, t-1' i z 771-7• z —' z ee..,ae Magda L-1 a i—�1 !1.---1;.J L! i__.1___:,..___11_,:—;� I—;1�` ' 5 2 Z 2 2 2 2 Z ! Z Name c J r 2 K 1.2 : Z 1 2 2 Z 1 !I-11 2 1 I r I K I I •< Nrban•Tree'"`"y v LL. ! L' i{ il_. i'L )L ii IL. II ` it `l�il `.li ` li ` i ` IL`.il.J .` ll_� r • • . ��. -' rte ` • 1 .c l � tiq t' IL 1 .7.-..�1 ••�,. '.• :--ii;-9 i'�... .•...-7•M1,•,?�. '' ..'ii';-,41. 9,11, 1.4,1.d .1 i +07 • t • 'mow , v.�. .� RS [ Y l *I� 1 i w .vim , , .. , ,i . ,r , .. . . .., ' ,, , i�1 !.. .fes .... . • . . , .,. .,, " .,,, v, ,, ..,, 4. .:, ,.. e, ' ,, ' fj ~`` •+111 'N '' ' ' " . • t .1-' • • • • .•••i,, I l //��T kbµ a • �. • r r rt } j7ff y F� 11 a •r f< f r- � . •,ja��p t I • ' Y X11 / /"�. 1 Y f ! ,f Ili�p 4 41� is I L ,j,,•'‘ ( , 1 • �';' \ d 1! 1..L ,....v.i INN!nil I'I.11,111 r 1 ,10171.1I•IS,:111.11i5 0011 .111,:..,ci11,111.111Priiii • o •, aBe. P!'•41tgt'illr,.Wr."1,"-'-'7-""!'. ...:'.'_. •"'''''..R-...,.... •' -• . -- - ...4.4,-4,e4r--.4:t.r..,..- --•* -r .. . .-',.. .. .t 6.....%.A.1.1...-,-.:..r- • .,,'. .,.. Aj !.-...1 [A I 1409 [-tt F . LIS [I 7E ] 5 iE• 7 E 1±iS . TH 99"9"P" ,... . ..,,94.;9.....,,,, ..,.. --''.t'-i.1".. 090414.:9:..- -,7.-.Ii..7""..::: loifnerm10112,2 tt .. .taiii:‘,2.-'..-'''„:„..iit.r.::-...:;;;1-2":[..„.........-'.A5'...„21L0...4.......:-Y5,...«° • '`,.•••••,,,......f..°°-°_ , 1 ' 1 [ Al [ A ] I:1 r;_1 I.. 1.. L 5 [T_5 fs I ( T-5- [7-1 5 I 5 1 ""8487)pursournt * *7:.'-'''•''''''1'.7:'.77891EII"""T.447911Frg'i-91:$4:7;7,..:„.. ''4,1 '...„,,,:., _ — . .. 9' '"'".";8.1'.99;:',...8.4•:•';',.u.. :,'..'',., .. . ".......tr.. ..........L. I 9 LINALIII199.,...,8......9.9* .,...., ,,,,, . , , , _____ __ __.___ ..._....... r--- . ATI ][A cg[2„, 5 ,ici , , I , I , cfsIs , 1 ------ altautodloqw SI ••-•„ • . ,. - ..., l' ll 51[ 1'--1 C:1[" IiS I --",- I 7 f1Sif HIE if ; SIT If 1 c I L818d 1:A98 91918918 OA/-Of 0880159:91 VC - .... ....• — .--..... -. . . — —"'•••:.3:.,.........r'•''''Ljmnimrmw''.''::'?, .,.3. .."-- __.. I N 1 1 N..1 [___N ' El I F E F 1J ' I 1 I .L € 1 E 11€ 1 L,_5_ Jt I ' 1 I .md rkni..an Oa,E.uoplod Et .. . A i Al L. . E[ic-IF, , . , , 1 , . , f-,- -- -j , • S 1 ''''*4 r„'" ET -- , 9"' . _ _ - -- ...- ...-= - -. i..AdI I PE] L _i .— E_ I11 -Es E I- g3 3,'3 i.2 ,..•4 d E Ls E__I 1--j E 171 • -. i Nil HA 1489 r. H -1--, I- , f Fs] 1 5 rE-I E S IAM° II -... sonsamAs m.o.'s IA ] 1 NJ [N I, 961L [6E11EIE [SIE 7 E s [ E71 s I E 1 E 7 E I ""'''''"4" .merPov...Patvs,.1.0,Ei 01 ..„ ..4• f .. '....--- 1.-- - . ... _ . ._. 8,1848I.90 INA8I41 AA 83 • 1 ' 1 A i , 191iINJ 9619 PEJFIELSFEIE SITISITFETh .----. ...- ' L . -..--- ' • • I ' . . • A 1511 [N 1 %09 FE rt , S i T I S i t t FT5 S 1 "'I 4".9. L Am,*vEdEpom 8 - ' • V _. — ...,_ -- ,_ .. _ _.- - 1 Al i Ni LN i .%St F1L, 1 t _LS [I ' 5151- E SISISTSI ".d7:91,,„,„,,,„„„ 6 'h-AO [1 I--- --ill'----- I.- 1----------1- —1 - .E] A A A 145L Ir I L I S _1 . 5 S f 5 S 5 S .18e1'OWN/882 Et 1 -' .- , - I 0111111t1 muutpcona7 . , • r fl 1 I Ni [N 1 95I9 LE 5 I S I E 5 E E E 5 • E 1 Imi"")""""" L- 1 LT .--1— 1'—LT--'r--- 1.1- -1-- losalloppo3 Daman 13 ' N1 , , -: . • ____ , •. .,- y . . • , N Int-i [ Ni 9ctt I sEar Itisit Is sitirFisFP"`" 4 „,,,,,,,,,,‘„, 1. •..1'41111'IN . ,,. ,.•Ar31,101,o . . ' • . .,. • L . ,. _ I L.__I 1 - -I . .., I . 818d 18:1884.99 .I/!' — A 1 FN FN 'FIFE LS, ET+ f HE Elqf Ei s31,00333•13 9-980 9 -,469.99-- ..-, -.:9 -.. — — -- 1.- . ., .. LA 1 N i EN i L_I 9495 rEEIITITTSII751_51ErEIEJ5IIILL"d'91"" ,A•33,33 muladsVAIN) s ir --V •.., ' ° .„5. °11411:1 .'5 .•• , 15„ ai,...41";.11.:Nte'ePkT,1110 q.,:.::01,'...c''... ' ''''.4"..' ."''' .,. ..'.1'!'',r -V''' :'-- . ...'.... • L.... , 611IN 9419 ilEi [ILIISII LEIThSIE Sif ] '"dtr,(3,,,,,,„„,,,,,,,,,,d„ . . . I .M911898880 .4 ''. . liik ., . . _ ,..,. , . 1454 I r---1 I Ni i ,.. 1 %/.9 FEE . rErtTsrE sisITTsit t si t 13.4330 SOJOJ 1 - ,__.— r____.—-- 1.....All. Z .' [A j m 1 •-- r-- r --- 1 1 -• 1 'FILEEIIELE_LglEic I s LE 1 ' 1 c '1 Ji.J ""="Cli..-- E , 4, 1 _ _ . _ _ __ _ A_ Aj FA-1 %LA LH e Mit cisis I' MT 51 331D1e31,AIM i . . • ., — .... , I A 1 , A 1 [A 909 [SEILtitISII TEFISIElq€ 15 .1 ‘99"'"u" 81,08.891..85889 • . 'AIL, i w g-3l? ,t-' t";• e 5 i 6 :i q f 7: f . $1110[H• , . ..x • • ., n. 4 E EE ; 4 4 4 k F f :5:2 g =I 2: k i ' •-.. . i ':'-.,?: i k .., f r.' ,2 •, ii ..., :. lc..015 •...,/, A • . ... .. ... . . . ... . - ... . A ri '}MP..; r;. c-! /: - - ` *4 ` i i - r • d6 a +n- l • _ -_-.'410e.'!:'• ' . , � ,fi, "t _ p.,,. It'..! ra -..:44,-...,,,,,.,;. a ... / Tt, .iIII 4- .• 1,$Al Ill,.. f'• t ^ i . , r:. r .. !-CP1 :, • r 4r yC . `<ry�pl d: 1h 'fir htcr .,,,,„„,...-.• ..' / r�1 1.111:111f hnf 'Y L, • i -•MI . • '; 4-•••-••• ; 1 � � tl •d ! y . r • +-may-.. : ' J • --y� y •, j ,• + 'I10 . tr• • • ''� '4., r+ +L \• `� ,di t • _ • ^ -•t� .� K ••� - •. .. - - •'� , 'Ia-l�'i t R - j{'h4- `� ' ma�y�,}} �1 i'•` � -, v, l .. ... : . •• .,�v . •' .kms ` _ 'iii�li�vryf� - L n.: .. ...-• \sees I� OVERALL MAXIMUM HEIGHTS urs.., :"r • '"•` ....•rtigC' - ` .. b�• • ;.,. .• to IN EXCESS OF 25 FEET ? "•fir Acer rubrum Bucida buceras Bulnesia arborea Sursera simaruba Red Maple Black Olive Verawood Gumbo Limbo This Aexaelupus tree displays red a oluring Ibis evergreen t res as massy which can !laving even.pinnate leaves,butter-yellow. Shiny led and peeling bark Wind tolerant. during different seasons of the year Good gain.sidewalks.caws lir anything else they radially symmetrical!lowers.and winged (Cr wet sites. drop am Gbuu:.zea Open gree:l areas hollow pods !(eight Range:21' 40' . Spread:25'-:411' Height Range:.(1'•GO' l(sight Range:40'•fill' Gilgit Rang!:40' Tree'type Native Spread:10 •20' Spread::43'-50' Spread:211'•:40' Growth Rate.Moderate Tree Type Raeve 'I ree Type:Shade Tree Size Large Growth[lab:::Round GI,Val:Rale bass (iru3vlh lilt,"Slues' free type'Flowering llnn.ght tolervuu•:i13gn Growth Ifaint:Uva],Round tlprighl {;!'ninth Ilabit:Oval.Rounded Shape Growth RatanMoelemle - Furl 111%.11i011 1e'quiremeuh:Low Drought tolerance LawIlmught tnic•rancc:liigh Itloont hog S.bsoO:Spring/Summer/Fall Fertilization 34••ge.i:Ytneuts:Lave FeRaizaUoi:!ieuaii Villeins:Lnu• Rluonnng Season Spring/Summer i • e:. -^ /►+v "` •c { - ?' ! ; ,• c _ op y -", `rte .� y .. ?� • Calopyllum brasiliense Cassia fistula Cassia grandis Cassia javanica Ceiba pentandra Ceiba speciosa Brazilian Beaulyleaf Golden Shower Pink Shower Apple Blossom Shower Kapok Tree Silk Floss Tree Evergreen Tree tit.et has a good salt Iny de.iluonS or•aca:.-decid.un.s tree Ili:Li menial tree that grows in hill sun. Makes a durable street teethroucghimt iLs liege erre with spiny think vet y A grew, coone !aukirtg tree Inr quickly loleY':mee, great as ornamental tree.grows in hill sit range and is gtr:e tlruagit-tolerant once it large spe'rnnen tree.Dendu,•us III dry !leaning topical effects. I!eight Range:30'-50' becomes well-established. culldiimns, lleigltl Range:,30'-40' Height Range:31r•117 Spread:25'-511' I!sight Range::35-5' Spread:317•50' Spread:25'-50' 'foie Type'F.u..et,ng Height(Lange:30'-40' 13eig!t Range 75' 1110' Spread:4(:'-55' Tree Type:Shade Tree Type:Flowering Grnw'tb Haile'Fast Spread:20'-:311' Spread bll'-]011' -rive Type.I:ow'eesg Gruwrlt h lalnt:Upright.pyramidal Growth Rate:Fast • Growth 11abrt:Dense.I l nibliclla-Shaped 'free'type Flowering 'free Type:Exotic' Growth(tate.last Growth Hate Moderate Growth I la bit Oval.11pright Kase Shape Canopy Growth Rate Moderate Grown(Rate:Fast Growth Habil:Round,pyramidal Growth Habit-Oval,Roland,Yyrunidal Drought tolerance.Moderate thought to:era:ice.high :ought toler.une:Mode,Lit ii Growth Habil Il'egc lair :3:ue.ght tolerance:High Drought tolerance:High Fertilization Requirements:Liiw to Bloom:lig Season:Spring Blooming Season:Spring Drought tolerance:I ligh Mourning Season:Water Fertilization Requirements:Low Moderate 1P i cit Ing Season:Winter Fertilization Requirements:Low • [Rooming Season Spring/Stammer Urban Canopyi'uo!kit' "age I I 0 free StRYies Selections:Criteria and Mal rices 79 ,.. . r • - 7 )' r a,, .11 t , fi n s F 4 cera, +jN ` y :� - _� �i� d Chrysophylum cainito Coccoloba pubescens Coccoloba uvilera Conocarpus erectus Delonix regia Diospyros digyna Star Apple Grand-leaf Seagrape Sea Grape Green Buttonwood Royal Poinciana Black Sapote In P;114,11 fruit tree,slow-gitmi:g evergreen On:In'used as an orranu•ntat tier Salt lulrr.tr.: Guud seaside plant Broad Evergreen tree that prefers full sun.Salt fast growl rgtl CO.Produces sluavy reddish, Tree with novel edible t 1 u:ts tree. liacellent lar seaside locations. spreading and wind tolernt.Good for residences, orange Gowers in stnnlnor.Lung seed iKiii: • parks common arras eon he a nuisance.Subject to wind damage. I[eight:hinge:rill'-8(1' lle:ght Range:1 -Bl:' i'eight Range::5' Height Range:25' 30' Needs space to develop rout system to Spread 30' Spread:N A Spread:tit•2(r Spread:2l1'.;;0 reduce hkelihnud of toppling. True Type:Fruit'Free / IlcighL Range:30'-hS Tree Type:Fruit't vee 'free Typo Fruit'd vee True Type:Native Spread 20'-31i' Growth Hale:Slut: Growth hely:Mo:Irian• Growth R.ue Slow I:rewit Rate:Moderate ILeigh t Range:AS'-45 Grawt!I Ibtbit IiiliptioIt Ii 'Frye Type:Native Spread:4f1'-h0' Urns ht;u:utantt•:Moderate Growth Habit:Hound to oval canopy Growl:Hahn:Vase-like Urowlh Hahn:Vase-like P H I Y Growth Hate:Moderate Drought'ht tuleritire:Moderate Drought tolerance High Uroulthl tolerance:High Type:Flowering FerlilFeaUun keipWenients:bow Grewlh Habit Vasrlilu.Spl'eatling I i tsliiatiun Regoirements:three times rcrtilltatiutt Hein:ire:Lents:Mom.well- I '-1 In i Ret.urenruts:Low Gruw•th(tate Fast III,ui log Season:Fall/Winter . Drought:o,c NI tie e'High per year drained ierttle sorts Fertilvaliuu Requirements:Low Growth Habit:Vasc.:ike,Spreading Slum:nog Season:Sommer/Fall I{iooming Season:Spring/Sununu/FallBlooming Season:Sunni le !dooming Season:Spring/Fall l 711 Fit' •i' t..-Se • I. 1. * r:. ( $� ' • rh a ;,t _ ,' w �` ,r .. s , 1 .04Diospyros virginiana Elaeocarpus decipiens Frythrina crista-galli Fxothea paniculata Ficus aurea Ficus citrifolia Common Persimmon Japanese Blueberry Cockspur Coral Tree Inkwood Tree Strangler Fig Short-Leaf Fig Irregularly-shaped native tree.lur possible ia•t•rgreva pee that prefers hili to partial l:`.de:v plane•:Las a s:reel or garden tree Free with de:tv:u!iage maintained dux•to bet:.nsr sa'al:glet'Hi;1..vine-h<e vinic Nala:-a:ly:cute n:tropical hammocks natuahr.Ing in yards ur parks, son. 'File Gowers prudace a light fragrance. the ground. young:later strangling its host with heavy lhriiul;hunt south Pkernla:unl requires lull roots and eventually becoming.t self- salt for r:nt:utal growth Ile:gitt Range:440'-511' height Range:11t'•40' Ile:ght iiange-IS'-23' Height Range 25'-30' supporting tree. Spread:20'-35' Spread:30'-40' Sptead:1S'-2S' Spread 2S' Ifeight Rang':30'-411'(711') Tree Type:Native '.roe Typo:Shade 'Free Type:Flowering lee'type:Native I leigttt It:urge:SII'-GO' Spread:5O'-lin' Growth Rale Moderate Growth Rate S:uw Growth Rate:vas: Growth Bale:Slow Spread:OLE•70' 'Free';ylec:Nati:t' Growth iHahrt:Oval,Py I',Imidai Growth Ilab is Pyramidal Gtiwth Hahn:llulhndln-Shaped Growth Habit(biking to lanceolai! 'Free'type Native Growth Rate:Moderate to list Drought tolerant e:High :troughs tolerance-High Drought Lulel•.uu e:high llroog!d tolerative:Moderate liraw•:li Ririe lint Growth lt.tb.:Oval.Rounded with flowers Fee Gli'r..tout Requirements:toe: Fiertllwatinit Rtartren:enls:LOW ll ontamg Seanun Sunt:ucr Fertiitratam Rr,ian•elnents It months browth Hahit:Irregular utsuly Blooming Suasun:Spring/Summer Blooming Season:Spring Hluonong Scasun:Winter/Slimmer/ Drought lulerante High Drought tolerance: High Spring Mounting Season:Spring/Summer ::turning Season Winter/Spring/Fall lid (:rte et Miatni Hoath Page 1004 of 1576 I'rb.nn P,n'r•st Mastic flan 2120 • - S. .: - • a — •• • • Jacaranda mimosifolia Kigelia pinnata Lagetroemia speciosa Lysiloma latisiliquum Magnolia grandillora`Blanchard' Magnolia virginiana Jacaranda Sausage Tree Queen's Crape Myrtle Wild Tamarind Blanchard Magnolia Sweethay Magnolia Goal choice for large ripen areas Ft:Il San:rev M.i.ray used,wan ornamental Moderato-growing with leaves that turn Still trunk lopped with:ung,somewhat 11.e. Sege, :.-at hely loaves an:-d -showy 11re.:,xnt.0 tree with fragrant dowers tree red before Lulling in winter,large showy :slung branches. Good for parks, flowers. I Leight Bang,25'-511' pink/pun tilali flower+during the Smit mer boulevards,and illicit annus. Height Range:3(I'•t)0' Spread:15 -:30' Height Ridge•,40'-50' height Range 50'•70' Spread.1(1'-35' 77eeC IcFowrl i Ztii:la-3L" Ilrght Ranr•3l'-45' H,bt Range:ll'.60 Spread 211'-35' Tree:yile Native Growth Bate:Fast Tree Type:Native,ShadeSpread: -3U' Spread:30'-40' Tuve"fype:Native Lrowl h(tate:Slow Type: Growth Habit:Umbrella-Shaped Growth Rate:Fail '(Tca•'Cyn•;ilowet'ing Tree'I'ypc:Native Growth Bate:Moderate Grum h Ilabit:With.,Columnar tree Drought tolerance Lire Growth Hahn.IhnMalla-ShapedGrowth Rai, aNZ Growth Rale:Moderate Growth Habit ((vol Drought tolerance:Low Fertilization Kryuurmeit Mt eb•r,tte. lYue.ghr mlrr.ux r: oa' lirtnvth(tai ga::tnthueLa—Stape I Growih dale,::Uhl el:a-Sl:a;:ii Drought tuicrnt,e:High Rluntning Season Spring/Surnnier Blooming Season:Summer/Spring Blooming Season Sumner Drought tolerance:: High Dr-might lniermcc:High her:i:iratrnn Regain:merits:Lots Ferri meati Mn Reyuire•rnents:,Moderate, Ivt'Uliralimn Requirements:Low l0oununpg ScasoO:Spnng/Summer Blooming Season Simian, Seasuu Spring :hf dr. 'ni , f' R ��--+ort "- k �:j • l r ti —^4- • • _ jJ r . - a .• M CKs. illiainlitilk41, . • - . Mangifera indica Manilkara zapota Pachira aquatica Peltophorum pterocarpum Persea borbonia Pinus elliotii`far dense' Mango Tree Sapodilla Tree Guiana Chestnut Tree Copperpod Tree Red Bay South Florida Slash Pine Popular Bug tree,l be flowers ire used Thu evergreen(rev is resistant to winds. The padre•, needs plenty til .sunlight, When111muntel.:he entire Itee's canopy Is Tree wilt)a reddish brown hark with hvergreru runnier l hat has l elatively long to repel umsquitus.'1'Ius trail is good for neaidunn+ tree tvllll showy fragrant smntherrd with a yellow blanket of,towels Irregular!urniws that tilallaraW tint'topped needles Needles grow in clusters of 2-:3 • public ripen space or residential nes. 11,1011 Hauge:90'-'10' !lowers with pods that ripen to a coppery red ridges. and measure apps isint:rtely(12 inches)in 51r1•ank 30'-45 lengL.it doesn't tint well in grade change's Iletght Ranger Sir-100' 'gee Type:Fruit Tree (Night Range:50'-0(1' Height Range:4(1'-SC' lirpght Range:i0'-511' and trallic above it vs-ten I. Spread::3 5'-45' Growth Ramo:Slow Spread:211'•30' Spread:30'-40' Spread 30'•fill' 'tree Type:Fruit Ti et. Growth I habit:gym rnidal ithen Young Tree'type:Shade Tree Type Flowering,Shade 'I1re Type:Native Height Range:Bii'-ISD' Grow-:h Rite Moderate Drought tolerant e:High Growth Rate:Slow Growth Rare:Fast Growth kale:Moderate Spma:l:35-50' Growth Mogul:Umbrella-S:t,ipe• I3lnunting Season.Winter/Summer Gi>rwth Baba:Columnar Growth Bab:::S u.+e•l.ke,dr nsrly foliated Growth Habil Dense,Well Rounded 'free Type:Native Drought tolerance Moderate Drought tolerance:Ilitth Drought tolctanee:High ,drought tolerance:High Growth Hato:Fast Iilouruatg Season:Spring/Summer/Fall lltoml11111);Season Opt ing/Summer Blot rntng Se;isun:Summer Blooming Season:Spring ,ruw':h ilac:t:(twit caught,tolerance.Iligl: Urban rannpe•",u.:Ir<it' Page 1005 of 1576 Tree•Species 5eiee Dans Criteria and Matrices 81 • • ",,.. ,�. r w x.�, ' • ..-_ t in I. - ` M :, '' , • • '�' • 5 • • p , - • Podocarpus gracilior Polyalthia longifolia Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana'Nigh Rise' Sapindus saponaria Sideroxylon toetidissimum Weeping Podocarpus Masi Tree Live Oak High Rise Live Oak Florida Soapberry False Mastic Evergrr'en nee gntwiug in hull sun or partial A gloriously columnar tree with all Highly mdt tolerant and wind resistant, I lil;hly Malt tolerant end wind resistant. Evergreen'Free should by grtn ti in full sun Evergreen tree drat newts!illi sun. shady,it will tolerate a wide Gorge td well- extremely weeping nature.The Mast Tree .un;rlaved evergreen sitatle tree long•lived evergreen shade tree. and will toleraty almost any soil.It is highly damned soils and should be in oterttii I''tn is cons:dert•d an ever greet in its native drought-.rnd salt-tolerant. 1iright Range 3D'-Go' frost. habitat and prefers direct Stn!. Ilcight Range 40'-Sir !login.liange:511'-filt' Spread lilt'-5o' Spre.t.i 25'-35' Spread:Mr-(CC' I lerght!tinge 3(1'"40'111 Tree'Type:Natiyr Height Hauge 30'-Stl' height Range:30'-05' Tree Type:Native 1 ree Type.Native Spread.25'-35' (auwtli!tate:N1o41r:S.r1e Spread:25'-:15' Spread:6-11' Growth Hine:Muder•ue Growth Hale:Moderate Tree'I'ype:Native Growth habit.Dense,Irregular Crown 'free'type:Shade Tore Type:Architectural accent Growth Habit Spreading Growth I talo::Pyramidal Growth rue Moderate Drought to!e:ante: High Grnwlh Hato:Slow Growth Rate:'r.tst Drought tnlermce-High Drought tolerance:Ilugh GI myth habit Oval.!round Ilbwn:...it Season:Sprung/tiunrnrer/Fall Growth Nabi❑Oval,weeping Growth Habit Columnar Drought tolerance.High Oro.agit tolerance:high Drought tolerance:High. 1•crtilizat:on Requirements taw Hlormung season:Winter/Sprig • . , .•. --- -.r. . , a Simaroutra glauca Spathodea campanulata Swietenia mahoganl Tamarindus indica Taxodium ascendens Taxodium dlstichum Paradise Tree African Tullptree Mahogany Tree Indian Tamarind Tree Pond Cypress Bald Cypress AL:r,ril.ve mcld:eh odor out new foliage Fast The Ah-.can'1a.ip ore Is know:t throughout tutu wird tolerance; :rustic spirt a to kvi'rgreen shade tree with small feathery P:uvides a good vertical acreut to the 'thrives in wet sites.Ort nhnntS tree,loses growing.En-ut.ile plant hears black berries the world as one nil the must beautiful of all devrhrp adt•garaly Snit systt•ua to reduce lie {i',atet Wind tolerant.Seed pods t an be a 1.mdsc.apr and sinru:ti be used more in al:Its(cites:II winter.Wind tolerant_ that mbar et birds. Pees well hi reposed flowering trees likelihood of toppling,Large.seed pods con nuisance. thin ro't'es. (,atone be a erns:owe I!:ga salt tolerance. Height Hinge:(ti' f60' Height li:urge:50'-MI' Iiright Range:50'.05 I leight lt.rage.50'-GO' Spread 25'•35' Height Hauge 40'•511' Spread:35'-50' lit'ight Ramage.35'-0t1' Spread:40'.50' Spread:III'-15' Tree Type:Native Spread:25'-!U' Tic-i'type:Flowering Sin rad 40'-1,0' Tree Type:Shark Tree Type.Native Growth Rate:Nloderale Tree'Type:Native Growth Rate:fair Ins-'Type:Native ("nowt ii Hate:Moderate 3mvtti(tate:East Growth Habit Pyramidal,oval Growth Rate.Slow Growth!faint:Upright/erect,round: Growth(tate:Past Gnawth I lahit:Vase,Round Growth I lapin Columnar,Upright Drought tolerance:High Growth Habit:Ova! spreading Growth trait Round Drought tolerance High Drought tolerance:High Draught tolerance:Highs Drought tolerance:Moderate Ili ought tolerance:Ilfgh [Moon-ring,e.1.11:Spring/Smut ner I"rr:Hirzatun Requirements]High d looming Season Winter/Spring Blooming Season:Spring/SUMMIT/Fall 112 City ul Miami I trach •age 1006 of 1576 Ih ban rrrrN M::et-r Plan 202r1 ..:..., '74 ._..-'' .1•••*•*-**--..-''J:oii-' ''TY" ' - / '*.•'-..* :-''. 'it r'..-; r'14 **.--- -:i."-:,;'.-"-;O•'f=tY-4.-.4::•-•-'. - -o-•_.•.,.,. ....=,...-'..-,-•,,:!•!•:,:ik- 1-(4,.V..N= - - ..., . o, . '-'':Z-c--,-.54.s.<.-".';''-.•';'•••;4i•..'-`F-7=•-• ; •-•-'r''' ---1 •••71:-. ''' --.. • ' ... 't--4... • 'beer_ ..._ .. . -- . . _. , ;.+•-• - . _,:i';'• ' , ,—- ., ::•'' ' .f-tp- I. r isr 44 •• . •.4 .4 Y .it. .A; , i, . II ... ., i. la- ‘-4-' . ---• 1 '' '14 - ;' I - •' • ''''-.. ..-111' - =&--'-;••-• ' i *-f .. . . ,. . . isoug',, 1,1,, , .,..-__ „ ,r , .., ., . .. r 11 4 Mr - 1 -1 '1 1 " 1 ' t% -.1 i ..- '' ' ' !. I 11 ! .. 4.,--..---. sli Natalie Ili&S- _ . 11 L 1 ill ' 114 MainilM114 ' 7--- i! 1 . 1 7.1''.1..,.. ..;1•-••11....1 4'111 Or 1 .. : i..:#'•.:. =i I .1 ' , F I -: ' • .1 ' • -1 I illit- eammaammassamr=impmesm:. 1 ! i b' ' Mit .1-1 ;.! . 1 J,1 :i:1 . , . • 1 - , 1 _ t:tik_ lo . • .. . .., , . •• - , . . • fl T*"' - 1 ' 1 .. immum......m....s..morms... i-1 i. . . 11 •.k.' • .t 1111. IL I, it ' " --1-17 -1-1- I I, s I 1 *i i. ... — -.A' .; I .," 4 •; 41 .1 4' •i 'IL -4 iii I o ' I J1 4•1` -i i) o J,... ' -• * i' : . '•-. 7• ... II .„ — , „,,, 1 ) . ' i - --(:-:) ) ' . ..,. ,.. i,• ';\\MI — . ri! _ •• , f, . lift: . -..1- _ ! 7 1 i . - . ., ri - - . 4 ) xi . • ,..__ . .. F. :*. 0.. . •r! - : .i. . 1 . • .t . - ii-• •. .I '11 lit 1-4 hs...r.•44 g VI _ i . . • 'i . • if ,' . . , , Pr-r - ,•,. , , • _ IT I ' if . !... . . •. . . , .F.,..• •• • , ***.• r._ 4.• •••,5- , ',•. , •• il ., . . . , ... ....., liti- .... . . .,, • , . .4 L 1.. . a., ____... __ • _ I . lii."- -.:: . , t:',-10t1-::/•-'--7.*;:. Pit • . ••I -1,' - ..)..1-- IA 7 !V.:7'" - t .. '‘'- - • ' '11 .RI i I i I'-.ILO A., ." . _ 4.- • • ....0 - .•.'"' . ".••• .4,•• i , - • 1 f . 'f' --_ . In • .- ., 1, • ti 2. 1 \ .'_':.771,,- ,.:1_._:_.:_- ...,...--..:-.,:..-. :..._..., _ .. ., \ " 1./'• , • :ir', _ IV:--; 4 • :_ • -. '': - - -. .! . . :-: .......— . •„. .: -• , • , %, z, , - i k • • ' I i V • 1/.‘5. . . ..1,;, ''''\.‘• • . . . _ i• ..„,.. \ •: : \••• .. ._ . , , „ „ „ • • „. v„. :.., . . .,.... ,•• V. . -. %... ,.... \ -.. • 1, . titkik -54 l -._ "••4 Taialr • ' ' 1 --:., :-, 41V.Py f .. •,* • . till t_ ,. 4,, • r -r V.• - .1 . ; ..• . ,.'- ' .:-_,L•4'. ' ., . • ! -...- - . . -4:1 -*ill - - 1 i • k - - • • , ,- • • • OVERALL HEIGHTS BETWEEN 15 AND 25 FEET • .0.44, r .... ' � ' �. Me • 1. • Avicennia germinans Bucida buceras Caesaipinia granadilto Chrysophyllum oliviforme Black Mangrove Shady Lady Black Olive Bridalveil Tree Satin Leat Tree rh.•Iilark Maagrra'r have roots that piste This tree istme of the roi Is:be:lutihrl it A large evergrver tree. Decorated w:a: Evergreen Wet teal/or shady areas,Wind in,mut 11 the seduurnI instead of glowing So.eh'e lo:ida trees.with::s::1ait layers at st:uw'y yr:110w 1,111,00:?.he 11.1':i IS!l'IS 011 tole Min into ll,:dlnwing 111e urot In gel air. tiny(eael'Sml Lag/.aggvd sr'n,S m thin Si rips blinwing an.rarse.G green and grey mottling.Should he gruwu in lull sun Ileig11 Range:20'-30' I letght Range:IS'••10' Height Range:411-SO' .in he'll-di-a,ri'd sill. Spread:10'•25' Spread.10'-35' Spread 35'•911' Tree Sin. Mrd..r:l: 'ree';'yi' Native free Type:Native,Slade Hehtllt Range:3:1-35' ':rl'e:ype Native (-rerwali Rate:F,sl Growth Rate.Slow Spit-ad:25'-35' Growth Rate.Slow Growth Ila.bit Clusters Growth Ilahil Oval to Round Shape Tree Typo:Shilde Growth Habit:Oval - Drought tolerance:low Drought tolerance:High Growth Rate:Moderate Do night tolerance:I ligh Ferldvarnn RegrirrnnentS:Linc Fe.tilizalwn Rryuir'eenrnts 3 times a year Growth Habit t'•t.Sr'hk" Blooming Season Year Ho;mti Bloom eiig Season Spring/Sommer H:ona:ing Sr.nut Sprung/Sumner lilt nming Seasms:Sat:liner/1.01 • —. Z � R • • v • . Citharexylum truticosum Clusia rosea Coccoloba diversifolia Crescentia cujete Drypetes lateriflora Drypetes diversifolia Fiddlewood Pitch Apple Pigeon Plum Calabash Tree Guiana Plum Milkbark Well soiled as a 11111 Ledge,tilos'Im'patio Rx1rernely slotvgrowutg broadleaf Yotrig ll'urs appear pyramidal until the Due to IIIc'irregular spreading shape and 1.01 tion to Partial Shade'Ree/She db Full Sun Ia Partial Shade. tree that can he grown iii t he shade of evergreen Grows itt part shade/part sun. 7mtl4d:trunks begin spreading fruit cam he used as ter ornamental I rre. Primarily recommended for natural tarter l roes.has.]high drought:m.eranee 'had sea pes and hall itat restorations Height Range:25'-30' ileigl::Range:20'-311' Height Mange:III,._5' I ieigiu Hauge 25'-311 Spread:.111-3C' Height Hauge:20'-30' Spread:lit'•29. Spread:20' 35" Spread'211'-25' I lrlgill(bulge:2(1'•:SII' 'free'type.Native Spread:IP•15' Tree Type:Native Tree l'ype,Native Tree Type:Fruit Tree Spread:N/A Growth Rana:SInw' 'Dee'type.Native Growth Rate Slaw Growth Rate:biolytic Gruwtlt Rate:Moderate 'fres•Type:Nal we Growth 11.11311:Shrch Growth Rate:Sino I;ruwth l[alio:Vane-like.Ht and (in meth flab:::Single or Mo!tl-tr uuk with Growth Habil S::reading.Round Grow!:Rate SGrw:n Mrdc'r.iu• through[tolerance Digit Growth Hahn:Oval Drought tolerance:Moderate Grouvlh Habit:Then,firm lea:sin to tare H!conn:]g Selsun Spring/Sulnntet'/M.1 Drought gSe son: unt. liaise foliage Blooming Season:Year Round Drought tukrunr:Mnderot,' ilanq;ht lnlennec:high Blooming Season:Sununu han:glri tolerant r:High g' '' g IRumnring Scissor:Stormier Blooming Season:Spring lib rooting Svasun:Spring/Slimier Page 1008 of 1578 84 fav of Muni Reach l!t'b:n:i'uresl Master Plan 2020 • palm ..;. _ '- mu4. 1 l it F '4., .r. • . ,j: _{ 1 Ficus rubiginosa Filicium decipiens Frangipani Guapira discolor Guapira longifolia Ilex cassine Rusty Leal Fig Japanese Fern Tree Plumerta sp. Blolly Long-leaf Blolly Dahoon Holly Iixrrllcut everpreeu tree that lalvrates salt Braid canopy.Decorative/eaves More commonly known font.,uses in tree Can hr used:is.ut ticceul lice or shrub.11 .runt tree or shrub.Driller plantings. I;rnwi ng well in full stns to partial shade,it spr,ly conditions Drought tolerant rare pits,deck/patio..anal parking lot islands. takes well to pruning and can be formed dues best in moist sot Is.'free grows in part cHahhshed and thrives:it la:I sun or partial height Sang.:20' 25. into a small at cent or sIwc'anen l:'rr. Ile:ght flange:10' shade/part sum High thought lulvrant.• shade el:v:ronum,ms. Spread:20'-25' Ileight Range:211'-25* Spread:10'-tS' Tree Type:Shade Spreatt:211' 2r, Height Range:Ill'-'LS' 'Ocie'type:Native Ili•:ght!1.11:1:o:20'-Cr I1,-:gin Ra0gr.35-511' Growth[Lite:Muder.re ':ree':'5115 sit':roe Spread:10'-I.' Growth Ras:Moderate Sp:ead:11'-12'Mellen . Growth Rahn:Round Growth Inoue:Sluns Tl yr Iy,.c•NaUvc Gro Spread:3�-hGrowth}falai Dense,Dense,Rounded Crown 'I rev Sim�: Tom'type:Shade Drought tolerance:]Rgh Growth I habit:Symmetrical Growth Bale.Moderate Drought tolerance:Moderate 'I'ne Type:Native Growth Rale:Foot Drought tolerance:Moderate Growth Rabic Dense,hounded Crown Ferldination Requirements,:hL:drrate Grewlh 1:111 Moderate Growth i eaten:Bound Drought tolerance Mrdetale !dooming Season.Year Ib curd -Growth Haim.:Pyramidal.Deal Fertilization ite•gt:melnmLs:Moderate 13bnnniug season:Spring Rloiauirg Season:Year Rnuud r Ala I Jo. IC,... .a' .+., ji*i ♦,�L"4~ �V� n ,f.� ..vim" , Y • �} v 1. i 'hYer+• t I,u;.r ' t Ilex krugiana Krugiodendron lereum Laguncularia racemosa Lysiloma sabicu Moms rubra Noronhia emarginata Krug's Holly Black Ironwood While Mangrove Sabicu Red Mulberry Madagascar Olive Cent,:he rise as an at rat orsprrine:t tree Evergreen.low-growing dense-w'utxlyd Duo trill 01 liter Mangrove syreues.Gniw.,it Slender tree wish:rug,slnnght hrauches 11,11.:l ons er,hesI til lull sun'rhe I:-at It::ut hcv,:rer a good screen subject in resadenu.J or commercial lmulscapes. tree.I)nnrght tolerant and wind tolerant. lagoons and areas where titles may he high. that lurid leall101y leaves with red tilts. Is uu:.Ssy and its cnnsidei ed undesirable hi planted in a raw or clusters u1 three. Ideal for parks because tit their striking urban areas. Ito:1 n Rargr:2U'-311' ile,gilt Range,Gi;' new!n.isge. Height Range.20-30' frigb:Range.20' Z!. Spread:8'•I USpread:25'-3U. Spread:2' 3' Insight Ran35'-SU' Range. Spread.LS'-20' Tim,Type:N.rtive Tree Sze Medium Tree Type'Native Spread:35'-4U' Ifeigh:Range•:2!i 3U' 'frau Type-Itruadleal evergreen 1;r1:wlb R.nv:K Jeratt• Growth irate:Pa.l 'free Type,Native T•re Tapp.Native Spread:2U' Grmvth lieu:Slow. Growth naris::Pyramidal.Irregular Crown Growth Rate:Slew Growth Italia:Nan LPN,rounded crown 'i ice I'ypc•:Flnveri ng l'ce Growth Rale:Moderate' Growth IIahIC Upright,wile rylinnpl• Dimght tolerance:Ibghto tit Ilahit Round Ilruughl tnlerane e: Lew Growth Elate:Slew Growth II:r1 1! Round Fel'tilirnliuu Requirrmmnh'Twice in Fcrhlieatiun Requirements:Moderate Unraglnt;ua•r eiclr Ihgh Mounting Season Sltring/Sommer (resell:f!abib Sl:cnh.Umbrella Drought teleI'_lile:L.A. growing arson HlunntmgSc.rsnn Slnmg drotrghttolerance Macleratc liinou::ngSens�r.:Sprang Drought:,;erance:Iltgh ago t t'•o ttrh.nn Canopy'lbulkn' - g '-i.e Spit les Saleruuns Cr Ji olid Matrices 135 • y ti:, • • I r s.,.: ►' • ` ' .P 'in ' Pandanus utilis Piscidia piscipula Podocarpus Macrophyllus Rhizophora mangle Screw Pine Jamaica Dogwood Yew Podocarpus Red Mangrove 4 1 r:_ I'alnrlikceVlrgrvvutree, Deciduous tropi1.dU11and one 01the ntahl Thr evergreen or irsenuugtywbrkswell,n '1b Red Maugrvvegruws:dunglhuru,0.t. outstanding fur woodworking Iligly vdl a s'rern iii-hedge. stn Innes directly in the neva It near the - •) t t ilcight Range:2(t'•111 tu:o:art at,tul and the tidal swamps -(- I I t-�a 1 t Ila it::: 111i1(1 (('llllr t' Spread.iC-25' Height Range:2:1'.410 .m .. }-- •--- '•'- �• Tree'r'ype:Fruit Fie Height hinge 35 5(1 Spread:III' 20 height Range:US' 1IIjf i 1. �f 1.,":. 7.1 �.r� 1 i{r •I, i I IRI `` t . Growth Rale Slow to Muder.ru SI:read:35'-t l:' Ti ee Type Needled Re•rgrecn Spl rat-2' I' f { f of t ( .i I : I II I all hl,l 'i r,,,illi l(.drrt'tytini dal,IIii rsI,5:m pea lee Type:Native lir int 11 Rile:Slow •I lite'lype:Native f I li Pi ill j.lel I•i•ad1 .tt, II til nwlh Ilalrtl.Narrow,('anted tree Gn wth Rale Fast I)1 I I .x 141 .:1 1 {I ,1rr:.�r, iJ I{N 1 1 Drought Inlanm•r Model Growth Hale.Fast � 1 t1 1;111 1.-1 1•ulli'al,111 Requirements.i times a yo.tr Grum It Mable Spreading Drought Ialemur e.Modcl.tte Drought tolerance.Med unu ` a. .. t Itloumirtg Season:Wallet De night tolerance:high Illatutu:g ieasn:t Spring/Slanlua•r/mall iil:onung Seasurl Year Round f s■ L — I" J I •--.`•��•ll • Fel'ldi'rat ion Requirements:fano ulumning Scasun Spring _• � •_• r 'VI., n i .,:.:.- ml T I q it 5u of tl 1 �r ,i . J I.11iIN Fu. 'utt ?� µy4.J,#ey d 1/y 1 `v7Y : IIt, l e. �G 1 :Till 1 , 4r: a ...lir,' r' a r lltil • •,-, r. • p►r FX ii 9 • a kmC Dipholls salicitolia Tabebuia chrysotricha Tabebuia heterophylla '• Willow Bustle Golden Trumpet Pink Trumpet Tree A sial:1119 suitable lot'Si reet trees ur to Great accent tree for medians,Iequires lull t'.r,k't'ruutpet'hue is well...tatted for use us ✓-t: shade a steal property soul a strict tilt urlarother.meas soca LIS.0 • 1 parking lit islands and huller strips where - Ueight Range:25'-30 limghl Range 25'•3'J lelper,l tors tie high tL sod spare limited. , i.i. ' /r '� Spread:20 25' Spread 25'-15 ( • ( / , Trio Type Naive Trrt•'lype:Pluwenng I height K.utge.217' ;S0' I i 1 Gnuvih Knte•:Moderate Growth Rale:I•bsl Spread•15'-25i „l , ;t '`� '.r y-4 Growth Habit:Open-growing Growth Ilahk:band Irregular Shape 'Frey Type.Flowering _ --- Diatught tolerance Medium Draught toleGmre:Iligh III twilit Rale:Mutlelate , 1'e•r(iheatiun Requirements:Low F'el III'1ttan lieyuIreini r:ts.Noir,quin'(1 Growth IIIb It:Inrgtilar outline,Oval shape • 1 !Shunning Season:Spring Bluun.iug 5',5[11 Spl:ng Drought tolerant•:high 'c' t %'� BloomingSe•asuu Sprdtg/Sommer .:i . Re (:m a:}nand Ileacl. -age t t o l7h.n::•,rest M,n:er 'III:_cel • ,.4 ` J4� yam y Ff ° ,- ,r OVERALL HEIGHTS +_ e ,'d s 4.. i. ..0 , UP TO 15 FEET - 4 ..• tr rt}t • -# 0i. •. I ,Acacia choriophylla Annona glabra Ardisia escallonioides Bucida spinosa Cinnecord Pond Apple Mariberry Spiny Black Olive Can serve a•.1:1 atrt•:It ar sptrlCcen tree fond Aiiplr is best plaints'as a 6ugr shrub I'sid as all evergnwn shrab in small tier l'uustr.d bonsai looking tree and is ideal for a native plant garden.It's an or semi II tire:n wet areas where little rise makes 5:r tinr:xl screening kir shady sites. endangered specie in Flu rade. would thrive. Ilrrght Range'15.•211' Height Range:12'-15' Spread I n-211' I Ii'gght Range:1 -20' I lelglii Range:is 211' Spread:(i-12' 'free Type:Sheth Spread: -II' SI1rr.ld 15'•20' Tree l'ypc Naive Flowering li:vtnh Rate:Slaw 'free':'ype:Naos• T-,-i lope-`native brant]:irate Moderate Grnwtlt Ibrbit Bonsai Shape Growth 1111,Moderate growth Rate:Moderate Growth ilabrt:Shrub,Jli lunged shape !bought tolerance Moderate Go milli ilia bit:open,Irregula t'Crowu Growth Whit:Dense mut irregular Drought tolerance:Modtn ilr hrrtilir stun RINI uu'enleitis:Frequent Drought',derail/I':High Urnaght tolerance'Moderate i(lom:ling Season:Spring Blooming Season:Winter Mtn iming Season Summer Blooming Season:Spring 44. ' •r 7 r > , >tr + aS i' t, 4 'i� - _ • • ti .iso Brya ebenus Byrsonirna lucida Calliandra haematocephala Calyptranthes pallens Calyptranthes zuzygium Canella winterana Jamaican Rain Tree Locusiberry Powderpufl Tree Spicewood Myrtle-el-the-River Wild Cinnamon Works groat us sit accent tree:Ind fluwtu's Pull situ sl nal!tree. I'owdrrpulls are actually l:uge,last- Sllnwund is an upright shrub ar send SI aII spurn nen tree Red showy flower's cover the tIt•r In throughout the year.creating a hunt:uu IOC growing,wid'•shrubs.Huy one already tree with a unique spiky fragrance. 5111,111101.and fall.lost growth mut wit:. He:gllt It.mge 5'-15' 1i wised to grow rte a tree on a sing&beak insight Range:15'-20• Cuwer.rg occur in the full sun and well- Spread:1:-20' :a keep maintenance to.1111111111111M. H1.11•hl Range:10 1S' Spread:al'-1S' donned site. I l rigid Range 20'-30' Tree'Type:Native Spread:ti'•1(1' Tree Type Native Sprout:10'-IS' Growth Rale:Modi'riie Ilrrght Range:12'•'I S' 'Free Type:Native Growth]Lae Moderate Ilrrght Mange.I s:-45' Tree Type:Flowering Growth habit:Round Spread:lit•-15' Growth Hate Moderato Growth Ilaiut:Recorded Crows Spread 15' Gi instil Rats Slow Orni:ght tolerance:11'g11 Tree'Tvpe:Flowering Growth habit:Jeal :lrunght tolerance: Low Trrr'l ype:Native td ocean Rale!' 'trooping bract hes Blooming Season Sin high Sutnnlrl Gruwlll iCit,Fist /looming Season:Spring/Summer/Fall I-end//shin:Requirements.Moderate Growth Rate:Slow Drought tolrraure:high I7awtlt Hahn:V,Ise•like,Rimini Blooming basun:Sprang/Sumner Growth Habit Columnar Illoomin.Serio u:Year Round !tonight tulenntre:High 1, ]Ilnuming Season:Year Round Han.ailing Season.Spring/Summer ti.-b.,Civ•Yunnan' •age I O • Tree Sp.res Se10-11011s(.thenal and Mall res Et7 • II III Yl . � d. 'Ip h ellii i II I, '.1.,!.." • -. s. - ai alk r: #.• 1. r y..;i" ,.t'�a, t ' • �� . " lit ;^ r' •r • • vera. i • L ti �, •I i. XtK _m • r y ,J10,µ1:,. + - - Capparis cynophallophora Cassia surattensis Citharexylum spinosum Cephalanthus occidentalis Cochlospermum vititolium Conocarpus erectus vara Sericeus Jamaica Caper Glaucous Cassia Fiddlewood Button Bush Buttercup Tree . Silver Buttonwood ;.soaks Capper tart he utilized as an kat,Iwo for is weaker root structure, Marler ate sail lateral',allows planting This ti-el-cam grows well Iii wet soils, Small duriduuus tree with:Ln gel'right Fxtretuely slues-gruwmg broad lard uuder.,toty tree in the partial shade. this tree,it is most Loin:rnnty known near the beach, including Coal t.rnditiur.s and swallow yellotc flow'er's':lie yellow lowers evergreen Grows in part shade/part son. for its srna]lyit bold-colo red stature to slnadup:water, si nnetiuws cover till'enure tree with vivid true(;rows iii lull sun. Height Range:Ill'-15' compliment landscapes Height Range-15'-35' results. Spread 15'-25' Spread:R'-25' sleigh:Range:Ii-12' Iil'tght Range:15'-2U' Tree Type:Native [le.ighl Ranke:12'-Ili' Tree Type:Native Spread:•1'-R' I Ietght Range 2ll'•25' Spn-atl:15'-211' Growth Rale.Slow Spread:10'-25' Growtlt Rate:Slow True'Type.Native S;rread 15'-20' Tree Type:Nat.vc Growth habit(hal.l'ase'ike growth fret.'type Flowering,Mirab Growth habil Oval teeny:(:Bata•Slow' Txc'ft'pt':Flowering Growth Rate:S;uw- Brought tolerant':high Growth]tate:Past Brought tolelante:]Isiah Growth l[aht:Round IB myth Rata':Moderate Sritwt It Habit:Vase-bke.Spra•aaling Itloolmttg Season:Summer Growth Hahn:Oval,Vase-link growth Illuuming Sl'ason:Summer Brought tulei:mrr•-Low Gruwlr Habit Oval,Pyramidal It ronghttolerance:Moderate Blooming Seam et Spring/Sonunr•r !tonight wieraacl:high Blot nring Season:Summer blooming Suisun:Spring/Sommer :,•' s. *. r .. :i. 'I, • r t� a. 1'. • , • 'I f V • _'* eA Jar !/'' .. • . ♦ r qt 0S 71 �i7, ,r,; ' r b o . . Curdle sebestena Curdle sebestena Eriobotrya japonica Eugenia axillaris Eugenia rhombea Eugenia betide While Geiger Geiger Tree Lequat White Stopper Red Stopper Spanish Stopper Geiger=lire is Nall dile mu!,making it ideal Appearing especially In spring and summer Specimen tree that can be usctt as a street '1'Ite White Stopper h.aur interesting, Can he trained ash NIorleiard tree.Great tar Fiver green tree;small leaves in right Mc use lit coastal landscape, are dark orange flowers which appear in tree ti-median strip tree in areas where earthy l r.rgrance. small areas. ' Birotation;Ili wers:liigh salt tolerance and cluster:at bran:ch tips. overhead space l:kn::ed. ch:atgla:m:cr.nace Can be planted adjacent I leighl 11a Age,25'-30' !Wight Range:15'-25' I height Itmga•:15'•2U' to power lues. Spread 211'-25' Height Range'20'-25' Height Range III•25i Spread:It'-15' Spread-10'-15' free Type:flowering Spread-25'-ail' Spread 10'-25: 'Tree Type Niase Tree Type:Native• lia•:Rh:Range::5'-211' Growth Rate:Slow Tree Type:Native Tree'Type:Flowering Growths Rate:Moderate Growth Role:Moderate Spred:10'•15' Growth Fttbil Rimini/Vase Shane Growth Rine:Slues' Growth Rate;Moderate Growth Il.thit,Oval Citswth Habit.Oval 'rnr'I'ype N.;i v' Ilruaght:o:errnce: High Growth tial+':.Hound.Vase-like Growth Habit Hound brought teleran,a High liruaght(metamer: High Growth Hata.'ti' tee Blooming Season:Year ILnnttl Drought tolerance:High Drrmight toictanre:Highs Blumllag Season:SW1111lpl' 131mn111111g 5a•asen1:Year Round Gil lwlh Ilnhn:Cohuna:n;Oval Blooming Season:Sumner/Spring Hluunl l rig Suisun:Fall Blooming Seaming Spring/Summer. Page 1012 of 1576 ar M l :, . ...i.,•-•....:.• "1i".M•.+ , t� 'NI t r t Y, . 'yh' . w T 1 Genipa clusiilolia Guaiacum officinale Gymnanthes!ucida Lagestroemia indica tigustrum japonicum Ligusirum lucidum Seven Year Apple Lignum Vitae Crabwood Crape Myrtle Japanese or Wax Privet Glossy Privet FE,:,L.1.1 n,it WV,,dt-hde!unt 1,1:11::making a Extremely slow griming lu+tidies t Accent tree with lull c'.utupy that ran act.l... fan be grown as either a shrub or small Ar,attractive&lough ntultrtrunked plant. All alltarllt•e.unl tough plant that rea!a:res viral for use AI l.utdyt-,Ipcs. evergreen['wows InaAll shade/part.,aa aUutlor. tree !'cud u.a<wide,showy!lowers.lla.a Kcyui:rs link'rn.nn[rNan.o IiXUcmrly last .ftllr matin el Extremely last growing DOH.gray/red hark that exfoliates. growing can add green to new l:uldccape.s and ran add green to new landscapes Height Range:I d'-l 2' Ileigh:Rel get 22-10' Iteighl hang.•'Ill'•21' quickly. glarkiy Spread:5"-H' Slltl.' '-12' Spread.IC-15' ih•tiht It.m e:15'-Mn' 711.1•Type Native Tree Type:Native Spread:rend:15' 25' Height liar II'•'12' Height Range.20'-30' YP Tree Sire:Medium I1 k"'' Growth Hatt•SlowCn•r'lypr:Native Growth Rate:Slow "leer size:hh•diu!p Spread 15'-25' Spread 211 -15 Gr nw;lt Flail:Roa,ttlG!uwth LI •Slow Growth!Il-' Roand Tree Type Fluwernig Tree Type:Flowering Inst.type:P:ower:rg Drought lnletonce:High Growth Hah1t Round Drought 1olerante,111gla Growth Hate Model ate Growth]Lute:Moderato Growth Roue:Moderate I1luurtOng Scasnre Spring/SuniucrII roughl tolerance:High Parotin rant lirquin•mmnls.Moderate Growth It.thlt:Vase-like Growth liahit Vase-like.Hound,Spreatti!g, Growth I taint:Boom',Vase-Ilke Blooming Season:'iv.Ruurd Blooming Year Roundtt:gift tolerance:!llgh Hlcxllna:gleaxun:Spring Illtwnr:ng Season:Spring liltooming Season:Spring/Summer r • - IL 4 ' tri✓ • . naw jL' 1 .rat;:..' S • . : _ ''4'm */#014fe • Myrica cerifera Myrcianthes Iraglans Myrsine guianensis Parkinsonia aculeata Pimenta dioica Plinia cauliflora Wax Myrtle Simpson's Stopper Myrsine Jerusalem Thorn All-Spice Tree Jabolicaba Att quablr to al hjbiats,growing I::rdy native;can he pouted adjacent to Large shrub Ca,mall tree With at,erect Small phi ur•htl1e tree with open foliage Adapt•to 1110:51 t ut:dNuON easily mid docs SIrnrica'.-:ee,iunt-stzed cultivated fent nat'ally:i wetlands power;lint.Swill hagra of dower.•sold: :r:r,uk Mud or.irregular narrow crown well in dappled shade or sun tree naive to South lir.teS 111,11 produces on berries atraCtive Iu birds. Gull sun to light shade. I Ii•Ight Hauge:15'-211' abundantL'ut high ur Vitamin C. Ileight Range-10'-15' Spread:211'•25' lle:git Runge:15''2(1' Spread:8'-1n' hangar11.utge:20'•3U' lou:lpl slangy:Ii•-15' 'lire"type flowering Spread:l5'-2c' Ile:ghi Rang, 15''•ur Tree Type Native. Shead:15'-25' Spread:H'-12' Growth Rate Fas( 'IYee l'ype:flowering Spread,111'-.AH' Growth How Past 'Li re'type:Native 'free Type:Nalwe Growth Habit:Umbrella,Vase-like Growth Rite:Slow to Moderate Growth HOW:Slow' Gowv:l:!I.t!::I'Ruural Gi a wvth Rate Stow Growth hate:Moderne 'I:uugh[tolerance: ll:gh Growth Halt:::Ittegttltr oea: Growth i lata-Mula-ti unit.ural Drought tolerance:High Growth l haft Round Growth Naha:Upright Blooming Season:Spring/Sunnier Drought tolerant r:Iligh 1lluutning Season.lieu-nut times.ayea n- IllotwnMgSeason:Spring/W'into r Drought tulcranre'lbgh Drought nllt•Iance:high Blooming Scasun Spring ltit arming Season:Spring/S.unmet H:.etmung Sr:,tun Year Hnaid 1'-I,.d.Canepr"b bill' Page 1013 of 1576 '.tee 5p'a Ie,5elee dot,I'I li i as.and Mali ces 09 c r. 1.Y. - , i R_• • _ r - 4� .•. - •j `, :Mt +:,MI ` nl.. •I y7' i . 1 Pithecettobium keyense Quercus geminala Randle aculeata Reynosia septentrionalis Spondias dulcis Tabebuia aurea Blackhead Sand Live Oak White indigo Berry Darling Plum Golden Apple/Ambarella Yellow Tabebuia Acce:n,i:spitlnren sinal or small tree Stud!.:w•Oak tree can glues III sandy. Sli:'u^border er foundation plant that Salt'tolenant tree nlako:g it ideal aur use in The Ute is utter:Cultivated is the Culnl'lulatcertl tree din Mg flowering along lhrcoasl.lin fler plantings. >u:lb habitat and dues not reailt the often produces spates.11 lite base of leaves. mesial lands.apes. .rupits,hush for IN edihlr l reit and as an sc•a,rn. dintansiruts of the live Dalt Provides signiliamt lin id and moderate iirna Mel la l trete. Ile.gal[Lange.I(I'-lti' atauno:s of;over foraelldlile Ileighl Hauge fir-20' l lerpht Range.Ii-:5' Spread:ti'-IS' Ilrlght Range:15'-:ill' Spread N/A lir:ght flange:30'-•;0' Srn-ad.1C'-IS' 'Free Type:Native Spread:111'-15' Ileight Range:Cr-Ir 'flee'hypo;:NWivl• Spread:lar-50' Tire Type Havering Growth Hate:Moderate 'Fire'Type.Native Spread:3-f: Growth Rate:Slow Tree type'Fruit'I'ree Growth Rate:Moderate Growth I la bit.Irregular ulnen with shun Carnvth Rine Slow .fore-Iype.Native Shrub Growth Habit Itnund,Irregular Shape hnnvtli R,rte:-res: Gn:wtil flat,«-I{uuMI.it'ego far Shape trunk I ituwth Hahlt:Round,irregular Shape Growth lime:Slow In Moderate Drought tolerance:High Gnlwtlt HAM:Round,Irregular Shape Un,ught tolerance:I ugh Dana:ht tolerance:Hight I/rough:tolerance High Grursslh.Hahn:Erect t:'.tri&nitriow Crown Blooming Stamm:Spring/Summer Untught tolerance:Moderate pronating Sra,vn:hS'iulcr/Spnog llirnor11titgSeasnrl Year Rnand e•rtiltz:;dart Requirements.Low Dr rni gilt U.ler,nee•:Illgli Blain:ti:rg tie,:NI:II Spring/Sunnier':/i-a;L [;looming Sr';isnl:Spring Blooming Season:Year Round . rt 1k•-•Y `tom';• S •• •J ...• .. r +!I; pa 1 " .. - -:�.Y. • x v y, . .':♦ ,rt, I r • TAY .. • • f • rr a. - a J CII II' ..T MS]'VyW .I i�'•.�. • • r r • :}J ,° alt} 1�• _� •. • • Tabebuia impetiginosa Tecoma stens Ximenia americana Zanthoxylum/agora •'-'6 Purple Tabebula Yellow Elder Tallow Wood Plum Wild-lime Cntnllilll.Itnil U-ce during fluweri«g This tree is noted Sir its bill hent hell- Great for natural landscapes and habitat Foliage is aromatic.Goudas semen plant .. - ° • season ,h.rpet(,t:ugr.rnt yraow•d in....5.l'hr• reel,nation.Thorns:ha,mches eviler('Its that•ns will tic an asset. somewhat weedy grnvth re tillifes Inletting I height llntlge 15'-Z5' ill CREAM'shape. 11rli:ht Range:til'-25' Iieight Mange.15'-211' Spread 10'-15' Spread:ill'-20' Spread.IS'-21I' -- 4!':1 "14w�''� Free'I vpe:=owu'mg [Wight Ralige.:2 •311' -.feu',ypa•S are Tree lypr Naaea . Growth Irate.Mr dcrate Served:211-30 iM Growth[far:Model:it a• Growth hate Moderate e+ .;�i>•rY'�.M, .; Growth!Cahn:Round Irregular Shape Tree Tyre:Flowering Growth Habil:Irregular Shape Growth habit'humid . ....440:..-, :: Drought luiecame:High Granth.tate Moderate to'east Ll:ought Udraonce: Il:gh Uroagb;U{c:-.a:n'c.High ^• , liluonuug Season:winter/Senn}; Ii oWlil II ii ii Iris ill lint,r I II i in s/Si I r/I ii likxmt:ng Scasun:Spring/Summar/}':ill Kill .. - iq I11n11gla U:Iretuno: high itlountingScasun:'6,1 Ruul:d ,' -age 4111 CV(1 SIn,n«i Heat, 0 . I'rbdr i-pure i M.nie:'fiat R:_0 • -Et.,... ._ ..... • ... •,.,....., . • ,,, . . .... ., ,...ilk . • OVERALL HEIGHTS t rr* " 1.,. • ra,,,. °: f �' � ' , EXCEEDING 15 FEET `� _ • OF CLEAR WOOD TRUNK • +* ., , YYre' 1I` !ya w Bismarckia nobilis Butia capitata Coccothrinax argentata Cocos nucifera Bismarck Palm Pindo Palm Florida Silver Palm Coconut Palm lixi,-Ili-n1 LtuA p:nnttit large garden;single Excellent focal paint in large garden:single Nice act•ut in a.brut,holder,and can he Single tr oak,la ipc nuts.digit salt tolerance. stern. stem massed together Io:•color impart. Strad 50' ml'ir: Size::30'-SU'IIT Size:15"-25'I IT Size:ti-15'Irl' Spread 211'-'LS' Spread 15'-25' Spread:RI'-IN' Spread:fn'-7' 1nnvth Rate:Moderate 'ate Kale:Slowcrowd:crod:RS:.rw Growth Rate:Slow Ty,s$a•.g.t I ninth Type:Specimen 'Type'Evergreen 'Type:Native Drought Telecom a•high Drought Tolerance,nigh Drought Tolerance:High Drought Tolerance:High Light Reyuirenn•nls:Full urn.partial sun or Light .•rt:rm • rnts.Pili t sun,partial set. Light Risiiiirenxns:Fid;sent,partial tun. Light RA•quirenu•nu:Full+an.partial sun u,. partial stale,shade K or partial shade or partial-shade, partial.shade,shade Maintenance Neer. Low Maintenance Need:Moderate Maintenance Nerd Moderate Matte Mr uee Nerd:low Proud:Feat her Leal Frond F'atl Leal Fraud Linear/Silver,Klue-green Frond:Star-sbalmed/i;rrrr,Silver Com` - 44k. ' . M' -±.. sAs 'Irk'"' • r• ,fAXf .. i( -i �•• ` . "4-.. i; e a • .-I 'I ` of 5.. ••••.....4.;00h;•.•• L .,4. , ''� wet. r ,t• t''el"'/ - y I , / I a 4' C 11 - a • i I" !" y ! .` .9.e-- l 1- til Copernicia baileyana Dictyosperma Elaeis guineensis Hyophorbe lagenicaulis Catania toddigesii Coccothrinax crinila Bailey Palm Hurricane palm African Oil Palm Bottle Palm Latan Palm Thatch Palm single tiem,spotty yrtin.e. Known for iL thinly to withstand Single 1 r'unk,spiny puli:de. '.hrives on heat.mei is very tall tolerant. SarfaCe nl colt leaf is a overed with a wasp Known for long shag of hair that clothes hurricane winds. Scldptt•d c-rowttshaft rrsemb:es a bottle, down,providing a silvery appearance the stent. Sae 90'-5:r IIT Size i0-5U'l , Spead:15' Size:12,25'IPI' Spread:I N-211' Size::2'111' Size:20'-:i 0'lir Size:i U'•15'In. Type:Specimen Spread:10'-15' Growth hale Moderate Spread:I -10' Spread-I(1'-12' Spread li-10' Di migl4lb:P:a:ice:Med Will Growth Pole'Slues ry pr.Sh od..:eo I rowth Rate Scow• G:owth!talc Slow I;i mirth trate:S:rw Light Requirements'Stn to partial shale 'type:Evergreen Drought'tolerance:Moderate Type Specimen 'Lupe:Evergreen Type:Specimen Maintenau„•Need'Digit Drought Tolerance:Low light Requin•inerlts Frill sun.partial set, I1ruught Toleuartes:Moderate Droughl'I'nlerntrc:High Drought Tolerance.Moderate Frond:Fan Leaf ;dent Requirements:Sun to partial shade or part:al shade I.iglu Irquireneats:Full sot:to partial Light Requirements:Full sat to pa:'ta, Light.Remo:rem:cis ParU•d shady Maintenance Need:Low Maintenance Need:high shade shade Maintenance Nerd:Moderate Front:Feather leaf Froud:Feather Leaf Maintenance Nerd:low Maintenance Need:Low Ft curd Starshaped,fan/Dark gree1n top, /rood Feather Leal Frond:Star-shaped/Sua•r:ween %i;cer ur:derae,nh u,1...:,l:atag•y"ax:llsit Page 1015 of 1576 ee Spec res lie lei rnllS 1'1'llt'rIJ.11111 Matrices 41 'fl • `.r � ..� ,_. t, .. . w . r Avq 4i - .1 '\ Tr • 41 , / 4 • ,' } u/:.. _sass C" ; :, +� Thrinax parviflora Oypsis decaryi Phoenix canariensis Phoenix daclylifera'Medjool' Phoenix sylvestris Phoenix reclinata Broom Thatch Palm Triangle Palm Canary Island Date Palm Medjool Date Palm Sylvester Date Palm Wild Dale Palm Stir late of each lea:is raveled tvdh a tv.rsy •1Ocie•-planed orntngernent at leaves give Single trunk spiny petiole. Single frank:spiny;:e0 ole Single Trunk:shiny-pet,Ce. Clamping,atilt:-trunk.weedy and ha,. down,provid log a silvery appearance• gm.tl use for accent plotting. spiny petiole Size all'-40'11'r Size:30'-40'111' Size:311'-Cr Ill' Size I'-2 C'111' Sire:25'-35'in. Spread:21r-2:: Spread::0'-1 Ci Spread:20'-25' Srr•:25'•50'11T Spread:10'-12' Spread:15' Growth Rate:Slow Growl It Nate:Slow Growth Rale Slow Spread:10'•If+' - Growth Ran-Slow Growth Rate Slow Type:Specimen: Type:Specimen Type Specimen Growth Rate.Moderate Type liver RI ern Type Evergreen Drought Tu:erance:I ligh Drought Tolerance:High Drought Inleruue.High 'fypc Specimen, Dec ought Moderate Drought Tulelm nee:Moderate Light Requinemcnis:Full sun to partial light Requirements:Full sun to partial Light Requirements:F'1111 sun to partial Drought Tole r:111('e I14:11 Light llecarrenlents Fa.l_wm to parlia: Light Requirements:lid:sun•In pa1 Int.! shad.- shade shade Light Requilt•munts Nigh Shade Shade }hmr:emoor Need:Moderate Milintona:ice Need Martine Maintenance Need.Moderate - Maintenance Need Monte.-rate Matntenane a Need:Low Maintenance Need:low Frond:Feather Lear Frond:Feather leaf Pmnd:Feather Lear Frond:Feather Leaf Frond Fan Leat Frond Grow In three rows forming Iriargle '� / • ,t• r �` m r I. aI. • .. H r • ° i �.. G )111i i teas .. .' • Pseudophoenix sargentii Roystonea regia Roystonea spp. Sabal Palmetto Thrinax radiata Trachycarpos fortunei Buccaneer Palm Cuban Royal Palm Royal Palm Cabbage Palm Florida Thatch Palm Windmill Palm Mira docile le.:-seaside planting instinctive height makes fur an ideal Suet:e•Trunk. l:abbar:e Pa:,:is topi,cd 50:111 a Very deme. Accent or spernmen tree in the landscape. Comp.:::-..-ins n(51111 'rue,fin-like,green promenade slaternennl. round I niter,ill deeply cut leaves. liliege and dist i naive hairy black fibers, Sae 10'-117tIf Size 50'-711'ICI' Sae 15' 20'111 Spread.R'-12' Size:50'-lull'III' Spread:15"•25' Sae:10'-511'DT Spread In-:ll' Sac:10-20'1I'1' Growth Rale:Slow Spread:15'-:f0' Growth Rate:Moderate Spread:10'•IS' Growth Rate:Slow Spread 0-10' Type-'Native Growth Rate Slow lype-Native Growth Rate Slow Type:Native Growth Raze:tilene Drought To:etutce:high 'Type:Native/Specimen Drought Tolerance:M,dcrnc 'type:Native Drought Tolerance:Hutto 'type:liraadlval evergreen Light Reyui ements Frill sou Inc partial Draught Tolerance:Moderate Light Requirements:Pull sun to partial Drought'IMurutce:High Light Requirements Full sun to partial Drought Tolerance:Moderate shade Light Reytals-merts:Ful:snarl to partial shade :,:ghl Ra•yuirements:Full sun to par:ia:o: shade light Reeinireateors:Full out to partial Maintenance Need:We: shade M.unrenanu•Need:Moderate fol shade Maimmia nn•Need:Moderato shade Proud:Lineae Fan Leaf Mainteua,ce Need:Low Frond:Pother Lead - Matrtleu:mce Need:Moderate Frond:Star-shaped Ma intertmrce Need:M,de•rale Frond Liner,Feather Leal Frond Star-shaped/Orbiculate Frond Star-shaped • 112 car co. iaml!te.tch ..age t •� SlIS hair Por.•sI Master Flan 21120 rIx..:., I , a 1 In , f 1 ` + $ T" I •1 V f i ,/ t / ' ./ ''• / V Viej \, . * f Yl r. : I 000,..,,.. i 1 ., + it 4.11. 1 . dio . ;' f .lik .. f ! _..., , , , , o. 1.- -‘ 444 '. , . !w 44Y yr + 1 Ir , ,. F 4 1I �, yy. f ` �1 f • 1 , FFFf . • 1 li f r T . ' i. ► �� p,... ti 111111 ( IPil,"1. - ' ` 1 dr 41411 , :2 VA t 'a�n I , L i . I • , , , _ 1 : _ F 1 IP" p isii . . • .., • C f � i .I' i � ' 1 1 Yt { :� r 6 „ r' � ' ',I :` . , _ P 017 of 1576Olt •44 SIF{"X114 , 0 �'�• .. 1i` -_• . i. .,._ • 4 • . fM ..--:- .4.:N,-,,,1=---, r i • rt ` t• ` � - _ — ^ .l - + "nom t, r+, .\ .- ",-3 _ •Nl - � - .+ 4.- - • -4 r ` ' -1 \ • ti� -ti ,...7 .,,.._ 7).•t , I , - r •ta, • : • • •c . a .F • )f F • • Commercial corridors • CITY-CONNE(:TUR CORRIDORS describe corridors that u-•• '• ( .. • Hospitality corridors are critical to Intro-city connectivity. These include • Gateways corridors such as: • Cultural corridors&areas • !larding Avenue • • City-connector corridors • 71st Street(li'ont Bay!)rive to Rue Notre(lame) • • • Neighborhood-connector corridors • Normandy Drive(Front Rue Notre Dame to Hay Drive) • tirhmrt residential areas • Indian Creek Drive • Suburban residential areas • Alum Road(north of Dade Boulevard) • 63rd Street, itIGHIY VISIBLE AND HIGII-PROFILE CORRIDORS describe • Meridian Avenue(Frum Dade Boulevard to Sth Street), corridors and areas that are of unique iconographic • Pine free Drive,and significance.These include corridors such as: • Venetian Causeway • Lincoln Road Mall, • Ocean Drive(front Sth to 15th Street). NEIGHBORHOOD-CONNECTOR CORRIDORS describe INTRODUCTION • ArthurGodfreyRoad(41st Street),and corridors that are important for intro- and inter- • 71st Street(from Dickens Avenue to Collins Avenue). neighborhood connectivity. These include corridors such as: Deciding how to roll-out the planting of trees and the in these would also be based on site-specific information, COMMERCIALCORRIDORS describe corridors that support • 11th Street integration ofa specie diversification strategy can he quite such as topographical surveys,that would refine the level the commercial needs of the residents and visitors to Miami • 15th Street daunting,particularly if there isn't a direction to that roll- of detail to a degree that this'toolkit'dues not account fur: Beach. These include corridors such as: • 17th Street out. While an overall diversilication of the entire city's • Alton Road(fom Sth Street to Dade Boulevard), • Chase Avenue inventory of specie is critical and important,so is the need Instead, this document needs to be understood as a • Washington Avenue(front Sth to 17th Street), • Prairie Ave to ensure that there is a design mechanism that supports Predominant Species Plan that seeks to identify critical • 71st Street(front Rue Notre Dame to Rue Vendome) • Sheridan Avenue the creation of'place',supports notions of neighborhoods, street and corridors,as well as makes an attempt to create Normandy thrive (froom Rue Vendome to Rue Notre • 47th Street communicates a hierarchy of roadway and streetscapes, some level of distinction between the larger chaacter- Dance) • 77th Street and operates as a city-wide wayfinding system. The areas of the City. Upon determining what species to plant • Collins Avenue(from 63rd to 76th Street). • Tatum Waterway latter two of these are the most important from a design in what location,it is encouraged that the user refers to this • Dickens Avenue,and standpoint, because a significant number of individuals Predominant Species Plan to assess the palette o1-options HOSPITALITY CORRIDORS describe corridors that • West Avenue traversing through the street of Miami Beach are tourists, recommended. Additionally. the user should further support a predominant of hotel uses. '!'hese typically each seeking visual cues to all'irm that they are moving investigate the selected corridor to verily if special area are characterized by having intense pedestrian use and URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS describe areas with through the city on their chosen paths towards a given or corridor-specific plan has been developed that more are fronted by buildings with distinctively architectural predominantly multi-fancily residential dwellings. These destination.The ability or the urban forest to service those specifically identifies what are the unique species that are facades.These include corridors such as: areas include; needs,while leveraging itself to assist in the definition of being required as a part of that vision. The Imre specific • Ocean Drive(Pinto South Pointe Drive to Stir Street) • Areas generally south of 17th Street and west of distinct areas and conn nunfties,can he a very powerful plan should override any recommendation put forward • Collins Avenue(from South Pointe Drive to 44th Street) Washington Avenue planning tool. herein. As such, the recommendations put forward in • Art-as generally east of the convention center and west this plan should serve as a set of guidelines,more so than GATEWAYS describe corridors and areas that are of of Collins Avenue This'toolkit'establishes the first attempt at consolidating a regulations. significance in defining a high-quality, unique arrival • Areas generally between Indian Creek l)rive and Cmiii iris city-wide strategy. We deem it as a"first attempt"because experience for tourists to the City These include: Avenue planning decisions art-never final,and this'toolkit'must In identifying corridors and;ureas,several considerations • Sth Street(front Alton Road to Ocean Drive), • Areas along Collins Avenue from Indian Beach Park to he deemed as a'world ng document: As the City engages halve been made,including: • HardingAvenue[fromE17thTerraceto86thStr•eet),and Alison Park anti west to the Indian Creek Drive new area-specific master plans, the priorities of those • Reinlirr•cing the established hierarchy of roadways to • Julia Tuttle Causeway(from the City boundary to Alton • Areas north of 73rd Street between'l'atutm Waterway recommendations'impacts on aesthetic,as derived by the enhance their operational quality Road) and Dickens Avenue to the ocean use of trees,palms and landscape material,must he then • Recognizing overall topographic circumstances that incorporated into and reflected in this tree roaster plan. may impact large swaths of the urban forest CUI:!'URAL CORRIDORS & AREAS describes roadways SUBURBAN RIiSIDEN'TIAI. AREAS describe areas with • Supporting general,perceptive qualities of large arras and areas that are of important significance to the cultural predominantly single-family homes fronting the streets. Additionally,it us important to note that this is nut a street and corridors realm and experience uf the City. These Include: These areas lee] mostly like a traditional, suburban tree uusamste r plum it muir am strt-e4arumpm'hatter plait. 1'liose types - • 71st Street mid Normandy Drive,surrounding the plaza neighborhood. of documents require a greater degree of involvement and The Predominant Species Plan seeks to identify palettes at Rue Vendome detail that kir exceeds the scope of work outlined liar this of preferred predominant tree/palm species for different • 21st and 22nd Streets,surrounding Collins Park 'toolkit'. Both a street tree master plan and a streetscape types of roadways and areas, categorized by their • Convention[:enter Drive master plan,among otherthings,would specifically identify performative quality in the physical make-up of the city. • 72nd and 73rd Streets,surrounding the North Shure unique species to he located at exact locations throughout 'these include: Park their selected corridor The recommendations put forth • Highly visible and high-profile corridors I • t'rb.,,,(:aaepv";vc Lat' age 0 • Iles I".:uwmt•Ac trnh.,:,Sts tem' 95 STREET-TREE PREDOMINANT SPECIES PLAN STREET-TREE PREDOMINANT SPECIES PLAN-ENLARGEMENT CITY-WIDE VIEW FOCUS AREA: NORTH BEACH AREA 85TH ST _ •..l COLLINS AVE —.----_-----.__._— . 77TH ST r - HARDING AVE �._._� _._.�_.^._ `\._.•-•-;'.._—i ` c. • BISCAYNE f� 'I NORTH SHORE DR BAY +, ,T.. • I NORMANDY DR CT 71ST ST__. w NORTH BEACH AREA ) 7.3 BAY DR / MIDDLE BEACH AREA • / 1 • r 63RD ST...... __._ -- a (f PINE TREE DR . f;; 1 4 BISCAYNEi ALTON.RD -.-- LEGEND )i �. MN NIOMLY YISIfLE 5 HEN-PROFILE CORiti00N>I BAY I `In COMMEAQAL CORRIDO S I (ill \ MMI HOSPITALITY CORRIDORS I ? • PTA CULTWAYSURAL 51ST ST -z:1 cnY-co1L CORRIDORS I•CRY-CONNECTOR CORRIDORS �, _�. NEIONSOFAI000•CONNECTORCONUOORS MIDDLE IL L' \ ME DINAN REWDENTIAL CORRIDORS BEACH ---I' �. ..c .5.'-2 SIB-LRTSAN RESIDENTIAL CORRIDORS AREA — ••warn \, NI PEDESTRIAN CONNECTOR ROUTES . we ALLEYWAYS SOUTH 'r PARCELSPARR ELS BEACH �' �'• �, . MAICHLINE -` • o I tu, Ialy111M111.11111 oe:orli Page 1020 of 1576 i 111411 F.,rt<I Masa:I'4u:20A1 STREET-TREE PREDOMINANT SPECIES PLAN-ENLARGEMENT STREET-TREE PREDOMINANT SPECIES PLAN- ENLARGEMENT FOCUS AREA: MIDDLE BEACH AREA FOCUS AREA: SOUTH BEACH AREA .40 \ 411 (j .. . . ..,,i •7 -1-. MATCHLINE '- • .. 7 : 14.- .. '''' '',,,, . ,...,0 • 10 „All ;II: COLLINS PAM 47TH ST i--:. ist ., ..,. II ..... • LINCOLN HO r ARTHUR GODFREY RO , 1 !• "f 9. ii iI i .1 • . 1 I , WASHINGTON AVE ESPANOLA WAY 41ST ST —----V,- .' : 7. : ''''''"•••., ,, !--.. ; ... . U.1 PINE TREE DR .. , .4.-it . . L., ,,,,,,,,,, ,•-•!• -•- -f E-.. CHASE AVE 7 • : • i ZE }--• .z. PRAIRIE AVE ,,,,, ,,,,, ,.i. ..1..._.; .. 41/ 1 I . . O :.. ._/4 WEST AVE Ns, ( kl'4 ......., .._. Ai/ MERIDIAN AVE ALTON ROAD - II II lit NI ' 1 ,,,, ',,, 'N.4. `*"........,•-• 7t. i N 5TH ST _ DRIVE I! ,: 1 • • ; _ OCEAN _a -• •• if 001/ BEDS ALTON RO A ..gin '-'.-/- - _,c,,. II I - ~0714.16.401.n• i --"-... SOUTH POINTE DR _ 1r- ri „, i G fit 'POR, I opt 1.11111/11. ' MM.Nan „„4471 ,.-' I - • - 1 i. :.: . .1. . . ...,..,.,,... ...., .............. ',7-1 .... :_-.1 _._/ 1 1 i - •I--; -r -1 -- Page 1021 of 1576 ' ti-i.-in Canopy"Toolkir Trvo Plant Mg-An Urban Straloay )7 ..,. HIGHLY VISIBLE AND HIGH-PROFILE CORRIDORS �/ TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS • ^ / f r • Large expanses of continuous hardscape needed to • Lincoln Road Mall, / accommodat hn"ge numbers of pedestrians • Ocean Drive(from 5th to 15th Street), • When accessible,they are highly transited by vehicles • Arthur Godfrey Road(41st Street),and i :md tour buses,rc•yuiring tall.clearances front any • 71st Street([roe[Dickens Avenue to Collins Avenue) .. '.7 ':. street landsctpe canopy • I•:spannla Way ♦ Generally,the sidewalks have a high intensity of varied uses:walkable areas,sidewalk cafes with large shade y ` umbrellas,furnishings :,..:,..... Aesthetics are generally driven by marketing cues 1 promoting Mianti Beach as a beach resort destination; thl jti 1' •' as a result,there is an overuse[[f palms ill URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES w I Require the extensive use of green in1'rastruclure to rr. A provide soil volume for proper root growth '� �i/ 1,•, • Consider visibility,safety and building protrusions; r select species that can provide clearances of a • minimum• of 14 feet when mature Consider reduced spacing between selected specie to I'" 4r'v F`" • r pruvide greater shade .� • ;,p,..:, • Consider reducing loading zonr areas and repro"posing ,•• ?' ` k them I'or bulb-out and with street trees ( `� ' 1l ' . . • Consider diversifying street tree palette to include • t. 1 $ r••• - species regarded as'expensive'ur1uxury' 1 1 r_ .. • i)onot use self-cleaning palms or trees with a high „ ��_ �,•/•��'�'' index nl littering iu, r Recommended predominant yam° E• �'- . • Trees: Cathedral Oak,High Rise Oak ; i!i� �_ • Palnts: Medjool Date palet,Bismarck Palm µ • elt�, � .. _ • , „. ..41. , i f rillop_joilliall 111. IF i' i 'T ; ,w •• t � 4a.. — ..�...5(� ...r•+ ,� _ -- - i •` . . `' ff �z .. 4 —r •r • aim.. \ I 4I • — F'C. •.Yu. 41'I— • • 1 �l 98 Iatp.d?L.0:It:5,0z 8Q9 1:111,n:'roast MdS11-r 1'1.11131:211 COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS HOSPITALITY CORRIDORS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS • Large expanses of continuous hardscape needed to • Alton Road(from 5th Street to Dade Boulevard), • Large expanses of continuous ha rdscape areas • Ocean Drive(front South Pointe Drive to 5th Street) accommodate large numbers of pedestrians • Washington Avenue(Iron Sth to 17th Street), • flotels typically have circular driveways to • Collins Avenue(from South Pointe Drive to 44th • Large numbers of small businesss that depend on • 71st Street(from Rue Notre Dame to Rue Vendome) accommodate drop-off and valet services;this severely Street) frontage visibility to gain opportunistic business • Normandy Drive(from Rue Vendome to Rue Notre limits the ability to provide street trees either because • High concentration of restaurant uses with some Dane) driveways broil access to planting areas,especially at outdoor seating • Collins Avenue(from 63rd to 76th Street) the shared property fines between hotels,or because • Building facades generally have awnings that protrude of sight clearances required at the exit point of the over the sidewalk and may conflict with tree canopies driveway onto the street • 'Typically lined by extensive curbside parking • Right-of-ways tend to be built-out and buildings • Utilised by large commuter buses and large delivery have tall facades on shallow setbacks,resulting in an trucks overuse of palms as street trees URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES • Require the extensive use of green infrastructure to • Require the extensive use of green infrastructure to q g I provide soil volume for proper root growth *.a t provide soil volume for proper rout growth • • Consider visibility,safety and building protrusions; • Consider visibility,safety and building protrusions; w_x. select species that can provide clearances of a select species that can provide clearances of a O.R A. . z minimum of 14 feet when;nature i , minimum of 14 feet when stature I' ' ` • Plant trees at a minimum overall height of 20 feet f_ • Plant trees at a minimum overall height of 15 feel ' • Consider using standard spacing of 20-feet between ,, i • Consider planting palms in-line with shared propertyrl .•M selected species ', lines and large shade tree species along the properties' - A I cruel frontage r , , • Consoler selecting species with a thin,dappled canopy a that allows for some visibility through the leaves so rn F I ' • consider selecting species with a dense,wide- i«t business signage can be legible 1 • _ k� spreading canopy Consider selecting trees species that flower and have t • Do not Line self-cleaning palms or trees with a high g 1 ' I , . index()flittering distinctive character Y Recommended predominant species: Recommended predominant species: " • frees: Live Oak,Royal Poinciana,Rridalveil `'14; • •frees: Mahagony,Pond Cypress • Palms: Medjonl Date Palin,Bismarck Palin • Palms: Meeljool Date Pal rn,Coconut Palm _ r fir,. • ,K:. .1t, • ••i�, µms,: t r {nom f ,r Villa 1 .� ..t • , "r- it'-- '6I 4 .: ,. .. . _ i...,. , ..„..- _ _ . . . . .... .....7 . ... . _ . -...c._ _.. ..,.. . . .... _. _ ,),) .... ...,..........._____... .._ .. .._ ... . .. _........ . .. .. Pagef023of1576 tthat l:as�Ipy:Oddiirlc,•I..Inaug•tt:u:tenSv.ul,:c 9i W:.==r: .2111;.._•_.;:. _ ::::;141“.::::`"' �.r�� .._ .. ."".:"::—"":•••:...,2=3 N.N_,.cell_.:• _w•Ir•�..M..�w•r r:N•..i.r.Y •: � PINE TREE DRIVE •:, r: =••_.42•••_t- — ADAPTING MEANING =" M r�� -~'- � •:: �r •— The preservation of elements that contribute to Miami Beach's rich historyhas ,, ` "•""': :3,11!•32.....-�..• _ been deentedbythe residents asanimportant consideration that should betaken i; , :____ ..7.:'"'�r`21.%•: . ••• ;; '� into account on every project,with the goal to preserve as much as reasonably spl r k i• t' •" """""�"•w '�''""' •••••====="22:•:- " T possible,those contributing elements. Pine Tree Drive is such a condition. 6 t fir. ""'•""•"• •�•�'a•�' .■ -•'_" 511t! xifl P�4(tl�tN��fia� �., wiwwrw ar'..�i Si'-:'S' .-:.. :S" t As early as 1910,John Collins planted a double hedgerow of Australian Pines ,:.# ° _._ham• IS:...::w==1:: ..Sk '.r f. _r +�:•' r 1 •r .•r•w► (Casuarina equisetifolia)on the eastern edge of his mango and avocado groves ,, . rr r•"""'""'"'""`"'"""'":”".".::....•••"`.. - : "" -- to protect his crops from the wind and salt spray originating from the nearby F �••'��••..,••x �•. — beach. 'these Australian Pines have remained in place for over 80 years and ' ' �,.�` „ •, _since have become iconic to that segment of roadway,serving as the namesake �;,,l •.., . , r✓ ----- .--x-----f_.........— — _ _- for the corridor. `• Unlike objects and edifices,trees are faced with a challenge when trying to .j♦ 21::::22... preserve them for historical reasons. First,they are living,dynamic elements• I10 - _-- - - susceptible to disease,infestations,and damage from storms. Secondly,and • "" _�_= '•^Y - more poignantly in the case of Pine Tree D rive,these specific trees have a lifespan " of approximately 50 years,and we are long past their age ofnatural attrition.AnT ::•r a 7=1-7.-==. - !:2222-••• .. evaluation of the existing Australian Pine Trees has recommended that severe 4' 112 2•2122 - — pruning be conducted to eliminate any dead and decayed branching and to _ ='7 7_ • their overall heights so they don't topple over m a high-wind event,As ',? '7 " � _ these trees naturally die or are removed because of precarious conditions,new L ' y.., + _ _ ;.�,.•_• _ and younger Australian Pine Trees cannot be planted in their place,because _• •• • _ q _• .._ •' _ = ma • both Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami Beach have deemed them as _. '' * ' •' ► ^� .=,,,.:--_:_- - _== an invasive specie. As a result this corridor serves as a perfect example for a 1 - - t - t"r' n—star �r,ii_..u�tr case study to explore strategies to slowly transition aged and mature canopy �... �;r•_-, "terse:• .,_ - - _ - -^_ • _ M- to newer plantings for greater resilience. The strategy put forth in this plan _ 1 t t ( �lr establishes a sequence and phasing strategy to achieve these modifications over - � r :.e M T�a period of several years. __i 7_ RECOMMENDED REPLACEMENT TREE SPECIES: ~•' r -Y 1'•�' Each phase should consist of the same scope of work items,as follows: _0 `IU - - �r tee~ PReplacement tree species are herein being recommended as viable,alternate �=JJ (7j��((j It J JJ. • Locate the areas to be affected for replacement planting; 1111.plantings for succession throughout the corridor.These species include: • Perform an arborist report to determine the metrics for tree replacement • For the Medians-all new plantings to be a mixture of the following ranked .. kt'..•"_netrow mew rw�cu i r"_rL-u'c.a wfar m and mitigation,consistent with the City's Landscape Ordinance; species: -i- r-' y .17 -�• • '2222• • Remove the existing Australian Pine Tree and dispose of them consistent • Pinus elliottii-Slash Pine with the law,and rake and remove all remaining pine needle litter,without • Pinus clausa-Sand Pine _ _ _°- -__ -- i '•• exception; • Pinus taeda-Loblolly Pine,and IL: -=T- _�. -si _ .. • Remove any branches of abutting Australian Pine that may be spanning over • c _.•. • Juniperussilicicola-SouthernRedCedar ., �_ �_;' the new area to plant,as well as any growth that may have the propensity .•�� ...... ... t.= ism!: is: -.i.. 04 > Pine Tree Park L ., J� `t +N IJ ` Ok � J, r- Ill Pine Tree Drive •, _ , ,, -4...7; P".• ii r� . . K t.5 ma t2 ti t !ifI. a \ 11 .ar • e Sheridan Avenue • • ✓`. 3,,. f.,,,''i• Ili Flamingo Drive ._- IL,I ;� t .,m�1 t J til1'iT i1 d • d POI I*:Cei t a Ii ,. . u, M M L f • Pine Tree Drive .. . .. . �� :errs Si ,. Ii _. _ . Pine Tree Drive LIM, d .t`n --- • r yli.4 ' NII ~ aa Tai w., I. r•s. d CD h euy L L L 1 (kban C.mopr'Tuulkit• .tae Tree%+mink•An Urban Strategy Uri •74 p , 1' Flamingo Drive 0 jti It as , 0 ?? f ,'� • r 1. ` •{ .' .. Fagg Jam / 1.01111011 • • "4 , • r' Pine Tree Drive 1 , L d • r-IWO* Scott Rakow vs Playground ca y : `°r �: -,meq ciiP M ;C,';� �0 , . r. L.:. r4 y to L N M i Tor Sheridan Avenue -- E -,,, I r ,., I - ,,�, TRANSITIONAL PLANTING STRATEGIC PLAN w�� * 1 _ .` ' - ,t 6 The transitional planting strategic plan included focuses on the medians and i" .�\ •, I• .. • /'` if '' I, ' . Jar�' • . seeks to establish a method for slowly transitioning the existing planting to its ?.c l �� N t • ••� envisioned mixed ofFlorida-native pine trees.The phases have been formulated :•,.. •".,.,.. ‘,.,1N., _ - to provide the necessary changes in a manner that provides the best-designed / '• • i� ti ,,ill',' approach,in a manner that slowly transitions the perception of visitors through •✓,• �': that experience so as to not have an immediate drastic change. ..� ` 11, ,1 �. . r „ _PHASE 1 PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS-YEAR 1 s r Ah 1 . r i vti`.ti ' Identify locations of bare planting,where large gaps exist,or can be ' £ , t �• r it -,t created with the minimal removal of existing trees,to plant with a ,,.--r , , 'V_ . e" mix of the recommended species. Phase 1 planting should consist • .� _ r entirely of pine species. AEA"u, % PHASE 2 PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS- YEAR 4 -..k...,..,---:e", • _ , Clear rhythmic gaps in the existing hedgerow of Australian Pines and /.. ,^' plant them with a 70/30 mix,as recommended,to establish a pattern � , - , 4,. f• 1 of alternating plantings. _ ; a -..> � :' - „y , •l PHASE 3PLAN1'INGRECOMMENDATIONS-YEAR 7 y J� ! A r Clear and plant the end-caps of the medians entirely with a mix of .w. lire !rt pine species. / f• ,1,,/ �,`.�4 \. ' •L'"N.,,,]r ;.� " PHASE 4PLANTING RECOMMENDATIONS-YEAR 10 .� '. ,` •' •, - ' f, Remove all remaining Australian Pines and plant those areas with a - r , - 70/30 mix,as recommended,to complete the planting corridor. 102 City of Miami Oeach e9B o Urban.Sorest Master Plan 2020 . t ! - • t' I J a - 1 �l}IjlI duidIIi x1111II I� 1a. 1 INTERMEDIATE PHASE-PERSPECTIVE FINAL PHASE-PERSPECTIVE V - . e.. •+ .-.. r • 7 r y' 44— • - •1k t 1111 .1 it • ii''t } r , . . I • "fir"" '�-•+► ,. INTERMEDIATE PHASE-ELEVATION FINAL PHASE-ELEVATION Urban Canup'Tuulkit' 'age t O Tree Planting-An Urban Stratrty 103 GATEWAYS CULTURAL CORRIDORS AND AREAS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS • Emblematic and signature locations • 5th Street(from Alin Road to Ocean Drive), • Corridors associated with and fronted by large • 7'lst Street and Normandy Drive,surrounding the plaza • Generally surrounded by ample landscape areas • Harding Avenue(front 87th'l'errace to With Street), expanses of open space. at Rue Vendome • Similar to corridors appealing to the tourist and • Open spaces tend to be used for important and • 2lst and 22nd Streets,surrounding Collins Park experience,the selection of canopy landscape material • Julia Tuttle Causeway(front the City boundary to Alton culturally-significant events,such as performances, • Convention Center Drive is predominantly palms. Road) outdoor exhibits,gatherings,etc • 72nd and 73rd Streets,surrounding the North Shore • Generally,nn major access corridors,making thein • Highly-dynamic programming and need to he Park prime candidates for beatification grant funding. unencumbered in order to accommodate varying events results in large expanses of open spaces left unplarrted;when canopy is provided,it is mostly done through palms in order to maintain pedestrian level clearances and visibility for security reasons. URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES • While green infrastructure may out he needed because • While green infrastructure may not he needed because of large pervious areas,encourage the amendment of of large pervious areas,encourage the amendment of • . .�I�,,- soils to sustain through drought periods soils to sustain through drought periods ii i • Select species that can be seen and identified at a long ' • Consider species that have seasonal character • distance away,preferably ones that are a larger scale • Consider species that have a columnar growth habit i • • Consider species that have seasonal character 1 • Canopy species mix should he equal trees:palms ' ' • Select species that can tolerate temporary flooding I Recommended predominant species: Recommended predominant species: r Ilei ' ' 6'1 • Trees: Silk Floss TreeCommon Persimmonp I • Trees; African Tulip-en,Kapok Tree,Short-leaf .,. • Palms: Mcdjool I)ate Patin,Lantana Palm.Royal { •A • Fig Palm air d r r(i�� ;,�;:�1,w M1 i • Palms: Canary Date Palm,Bailey Palm l.31i1°'' 1 rf,. t rt ► • 3tlr(, r it i bill .a• a —1 rN • 7-S i, lit' . '� fi 1 f rT t. /1 - t• And .� of .l} .rv.. p r • ilk IJ a.' •'; S Por 1 _ , • m•i Cay.,[}.�III!uv,ia. age r :o 1.1.11,nl r,mest Mosier Pian 2020. . • 0, ' X11 ' �+ '"9e I�jr 1 , :. .. /'/- 'j . r:� t. - ' ` I , .` . ' .. LA GORCE ISLAND ADAPTING fOR INCREASED SALINE TOLERANCES t' , 1 I One ofthemore chaltengingaspectsoflandscapeadaptation all shielded from any water frontage by the large-scaled / j is the process of facilitating for adaptive change, while homes, protecting the palms from immediate exposure l - ;, preserving a clear established identity,particularly when to any salt spray. However, the more poignant and . • • t'r ' that identity has its foundation based on a specie that will direct impact will come as a result of the rise of salinity ' • not survive well as the on-coming climate change ramps in the groundwater, something the root system of the , . r up. Such is the case of La Gorce Island,a gated residential Royal Palms are especially not suited to tolerate. As the { •, `• island-community located on the Biscayne Bay side of the roots are touched by groundwater salinity,they go Into } City. Currently,the street tree selection that predominates shock and they cauterize and die back. This eventually :: -s. f '.'I throughout the island is the Royal Palin. The palms scale, leads to a much-reduced root ball spread that affects the _ j ', , I dimension and austere columnar character,together with palms ability to absorb water and conduct nutrients. A _ ' o. its relentlessly,repetitive use as the only,singular street symptomatic evidence of this is a diminished canopy size 'r t i' 1, \\\.; -. .,\ \ •.`- M1 / �,, ,.i:. ry r {�',� lel tree species creates a look that is majestic,monumental and a greatly reduced spread of its fronded canopy,which L T /_ and very estate-like. This is particularly a good match to manifests itself in a gradual manner. -.• — r the large and elegant villa-inspired homes that populate a i. „ • the island. But beyond that stunning, colonnade estate The more perilous of the impacts is what goes unseen. As u`` � :, • experience lies weaknesses and vulnerabilities that reside the root-ban spread gets diminished,so does its ability justbeneath.the surface that will inevitably cause a die-off to anchor itself in place. This has significant implications Al:' i. of these Royal Palms. when faced with tropical storms and hurricane events, As these weather events occur,two majorly affecting things H r The first of these is the fact that it is a streetscape that is happen: : / I. solely reliant on a single species. As discussed elsewhere 1. consistent, torrential rains saturate the ground, ;;' , in this report,a strong resilience in urban canopy is highly swelling the organic material that is present in the r l r ' 'S- ."--. dependent on the complexity and diversity of the mix of ground's soil and reducing the cohesion between the rt ' ,1 - \ �/ species that exist. Having an entire community solely various particles that make up the soil mix,and ;. �� ; a reliant on one specie to establish its identity and look 2. an increase in the unrelenting wind exerts an makes it incredibly vulnerable to being easily wiped out exponential force on the canopy of the palm that is with an onslaught of a single epidemic that targets and proportional to the palm's height(the taller the palm, f i'` i1`•\" .- affects that specie. The City has already seen this happen the stronger the force that is felt at the base to keep it in T1 with the presence of Lethal Bronzing and Ganoderma Butt place-this force exerted is called'torque'). . I `i f Rot on several of the Royal Palms in that specific location, - - 1 • r ! t!i which infests the rootball and impedes the ability to The saturated soils and the increased torque exerted on i replant in that same,specific location again in the future_ the base of the palm,coupled with the palm's reduced root *, • �„ One general,shared characteristic of diseases is that they ball and its inability to anchor the palm steadily, makes , ` also impede the continual nourishment of the palm and the large Royal Palms that predominate La Gurce Island 1 leads to its eventual death. especially vulnerable to being toppled over when faced 6y a storm's wind. The impact of hundreds of pounds of force '!- 1,:,.."�. ��°• °, The second of these is the relentless changes in global from a falling Royal Palm of the height that these specific " . • "n climate and its impact at the local level,particularly the palms have can pose a serious potential for damage and i l impacts of sea-level rise. Two characteristics that define destruction. t:I. • • the Royal Palm specie are its moderate tolerance to salt- 1 to • spray and its low resistance to salinity in the groundwater. It goes beyond saying that the impacts discussed are not • t / As sea-level rise increases,so will the amount of salinity localized;in other words,they are not impacting only one i ' r/I _ 1 in the waters of Biscayne Bay which will also increase the street at a time but rather are impacting the island and the r r j iI 1 _ overall salinity in the air resulting from the interaction of City as a whole. So similar to the situations facingthe royal .-. , ./ -.4 shorelines with the wind. While the salt spray will be less palms on La Gorce Island,all other royal palms similarly • = 1 of an issue for La Gorce,particularly because the streets situated elsewhere throughout the City could face the same } •,•, ..i.•3' • • • are all internal to the island and because the palms are peril. This increases the potential,for example in the case age 1029 of 1576 Urban Canopy''Toolkit' Tree l'acting•An Urban Strategy 105 of La Gorce island,for the entire community's street trees to be wiped out in a Addressing each of these approaches and implementing some of the • Narrow the selection of canopy tree species to ones that culturally carry single storm event,completely changing the character of the neighborhood. recommendations of this overall master plan,the following recommendations the perception of stately wealth,such as the Live Oak,Magnolia and Silk are being suggested specifically for the conditions and position of La Gorce Floss Tree. In order to generate the most upright,stately look we would As such,in the face of the inevitable,it's important for the City to prepare and Island: recommend the use of the High-Rise Oak specie,with its more columnar adapt to increase its opportunities for resiliency in the Face of these changes. • Diversify the palette away from the single use of palms and tilt the scales aesthetic. This case study postulates two general approaches to increasing the overall towards a predominance of canopy trees,particularly because canopy trees • As a selection for a palms specie,we would recommend to continue using resiliency of neighborhoods similarly situated as La Gorce island: have a stronger root system and are best suited to adapt to increases in the Royal Palm to facilitate the transitional character of the neighborhood; • increase the overall species diversity that makes-up the canopy of the area ground water salinity. however,we would recommend that the existing Royal Palms be replaced • selectspecies that have a greater resistance to groundwater salinity(such as • Limitthespeciesdiversityinstreettreestoamaxitnumofthreepredominant 1-too with smaller Royal Palms with a maximum grey wood trunk of native vegetation to the South Florida waterfront areas or species that are canopy tree species and the use of a single palm specie as an accent,and approximately 15 feet and continually replacing them when they grow to typical to the Maritime Hammock plant communities) utilize them in a repetitive,patterned design approach. This limited specie a height of approximately 30 feet of grey wood. By reducing the excessive • select species as replacement that facilitate a clear design intent palette will allow for a greater repetitiveness,which is a necessary design heights on the palms and maintaining them within a range,ata minimum, component to replicate the estate-like character of the neighborhood. the negative impacts of the torque force exerted on the base of the tree can Specific to La Gorge Island,with its large,majestic and monumental stale,the • Utilize species that are able to withstand crown-raising and that have a be greatly diminished and the impact of saltwater can be moderated. This latter of these steps will be a key driver in facilitating for adaptation while robust girth in its branching strategy.They will allow fora greater visibility election of using this palm strategy is one that is temporal,as the ground making attempts to transition its look and character to a future experience that and spatial exposure of the tree's architectural structural branching,which is water will inevitably get to a point where the specie will not survive. This is almost similar, In order to achieve this,for example,species with an up-right more in line with the majestic trees that are typical of expensive properties. strategy can be employed until such time that the increase in groundwater growth character and which have a high resistance to crown-raising will he the requires a more involved solution. best suited to replicate the monumental character of the`place. 'n' _ - r- 1 ' 1 i tf•:m :•//. , ' gl 11.;l lit •'_''. O ems_ • •V•:4'-'44:14%.414'".?.!-.-?441'''.",•1t4 ti b„ r uy — , a • r ~ y -14f -1 .r •• t ., - ;41.. .•.or . —,. v ti .1111. Ur, - I a .,�i` r • y ,Ia. p 4A11140:- 10 4iiii- '. u 106 City at Miami?leach 9 1 1 'age o • Urban Fermi Master Plan 2020 i ' k • W ' i .; ; ' til.I.14k -.'4...-1' -. . At . -r. .111.,.. .. I . . -. -.-,-... ,,,.•,,.. --„L. . i ',, 1 i, • . . ...„,.-„,„:„..,,,z,„,.".r -,,•_, , , . .., . „ . • r . , ,.,!!„.,....„ „ ,..._ - • . . ..,• . . _ . .. , •,.j . .. .. . ,. .. _..• , . ...... _..... . ... ... 4h EXISTING PREDOMINANT ROYAL PALM STRATEGY • st %Wu-. 1 r�lu•D , t: - ""- ,.. i� :�u " lr qhs Liar i:;; litzr ' 4ii!1.!'"'"....irr'," . .... -,,...; ,- PROPOSED ADAPTIVE PLANTING STRATEGY-OPTION 01 PROPOSED ADAPTIVE PLANTING STRATEGY-OPTION 02 Urban Canopy'Ta,1kit� age I U Tree Planting-An Urban Strategy 107 CITY-CONNECTOR CORRIDORS NEIGHBORHOOD-CONNECTOR CORRIDORS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT CORRIDORS • Important roadway connectors that predominantly • Harding Avenue • Highly transited corridors,many without planting • 11th Street • Sheridan Avenue have planted medians • 71st Street(Irma Bay Drive to Rue Notre Dame) medians,of narrow widths • 15th Street • Tatum Waterway • With some exceptions,several of these roadways are • Normandy Drive(From Rue Notre Dame to Bay Drive) • Large numbers of overhead utility wires,negatively • 17th Street • Dickens Avenue,and curved,which increase the impact of sight clearance • Indian Creek Drive impacting the fall growth of trees'canopies • 47th Street • West Avenue requirements whenever median cuts and turn lanes • Alton Road(north of Dade Boulevard) • Iiigh demands fur curbside parking • 51st Street are provided • 63rd Street, • Generally,the access corridors to property parking • 77th Street • Medians and sidewalks are mostly planted with • Meridian Avenue(Frohn Dade Boulevard to 5th lots with minimal landscape buffers and seldoinly with • Hymn Ave(Prom 77th canopy trees Street), street trees Street to 87th Street) • Large numbers of overhead utility wires,negatively • Pine Tree Drive, • Preferred corridors for cyclists,because of their high • Chase Avenue impacting the full growth of trees'canopies • Dade Boulevard,and con nectivity but reduced vehicular and truck use • La Gorce Drive • Many street trees'roots in limited growth space • Venetian Causeway • Prairie Ave URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES , Require the extensive use of-green infrastructure to • Require the extensive use of green infrastructure to provide soil volume kir proper root growth i provide soil volume for proper root growth • Consider visibility and safety;select species that can „'r� • Consider visibility and safety;select species that can provide clearances of a minimum or 14 feet iii .. ''''.79,:", "•-•.".' w'+ provide clearances of a nuuimurrt of 10 feet • Plant trees at a minimum overall height of 15 feet b Plant trees at a minimum overall height of 12 feet • Consider using reduced spacing of 15-feet Istween r ` • Consider clustering trees iii available locations • selected species 7. • Consider species that have a single-trunk,standard • Consider species that have a single-trunk,standard growth specificationit growth specilicatiorn • Select species with a mix of columnar and spreading -� ” ' - Select species that have a spreading canopy habit . ` canopy habits W . - • Consider flowering trees,especially where existing Recommendedpredominants species: ww., ,_ canopy is predominantly evergreen p -.. `' 'it • 'Trees. live Bak,Mahogany,Pond Cypress cy� Recommended predominant species: • Palms: Cabbage Palm,Foxtail Palm,Lantan Palin "` •" ., . • 'rices: Brazilian Reautyleaf,Golden Shower, _ Sweethay Magnolia,Strangler Fig _ _ • Paints: cabbage Palm,Sylvester Palm,Thatch Palm - -. __ • . , . _ •m t1 gq ac41 •� ` r `�. - �'" al k' 4 4j � 11z 1,0 f y.- ti�_ -. A Page 1032 of 15/6 Ion toy ani Sb.uai:lenrl: urn,nr Rne,r Master flan MD URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT AREAS TYPICAL CONDITIONS RELEVANT AREAS • Inhospitable walking conditions,as rights-of-ways are • Areas generally south of 17th street and west of • Locations with the densest street tree canopy coverage Suburban residential areas describe areas with built-out with narrow sidewalks and no consistent Washington Avenue • Trees tend to grow well and mature predominantly single-family homes fronting the streets. canopy trees or palms • Areas generally east of the convention center and west • Large expanses of swale and pervious landscape areas These areas feel mostly like a traditional,suburban • Excessively high demands for parking reduce of Collins Avenue • Swale parking are compacting soils neighborhood. opportunities to provide shade trees in bulb-outs • Areas generally between Indian Creek Drive and • Some sidewalk damage due to surface roots • Buildings have very shallow setbacks fronting the Collins Avenue • Many conflicts with overhead utilities servicing the streets,making it very difficult to plant large canopy • Areas along Collins Avenue from Indian Beach Park w Many homes trees,as their canopy won't spread evenly and reduces Alison Park and west to the Indian Creek Drive • More affluent areas have landscape maintenance it structural integrity through its growth habit • Areas north of 73rd street between Tatum Waterway contracts with professionals that know how to care for • Right-of-way corridors are some of the narrowest and Dickens Avenue to the ocean trees;trees tend to be well-tended to found throughout the city URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES "°*""` "l URBAN FORESTRY CONSIDERATIONS&GUIDELINES ._4 4` • Require the extensive use of green infrastructure to 1 • Recommend the use of green infrastructure to provide provide soil volume for proper rootgrowth I N: " '; 7 soil volumen where needed r • CO11srdertreesthat rovidecompact rano growth x i_t Consider selecting tree and palms species that are less , • Consider trees that grow well in inhospitable rTttl 4^,A'4 i ""^ I I suitable for densely orhan areas rnvfranments,such as dune arras and pine rocklands • Plant trees at a minimum overall height of 15 feetiii , , • Recommended predominant species: , • Consider using reduced spacing of15-feet between " Ir , • 'frees: Live Oak,Gumbo Limbo,Sausage Tree, '+" selected species hit Blanchard Magnolia,Paradise'l'ree • When using palms,consider clustering and grouping • Palms: African Oil Paint,Pindo Palm,Sylvester ".j . them to achieve greater shade F Palm,Windmill Palm . " ill -- Recommended predominant species: ceryl r • Trees: Veiawood,Green Buttonwood,Shady Lady, "' - J W Japanese Blueberry,Wild Tamarind,Queens(:rape K_ - Myrtle .t,.:4 -' • Palms Cabbage Palm,Foxtail Palm,Lantana Palm -- ,-..., 1 4004, r.tr 1*; a P 7 : S:!i!..,:''' � - r. r 1" 1,114 • 0' Ok . . . ,I , yi ) ti ; ,; • � ;' m y .. MS s i _ -" 9 I . r fufiiq l1 j L I +3t, •) r/01(i. . . r' .. .. Yu 1 i �''� ry .. 431 ., ,>f( `'A Tkit • a 6t,'.11_ •1 yrs ` P �. w a. , fir.„ � . _ V Urban Canopv'•1'eulltic' 'age 1 O • '1'n.'Planting-An Urban Stringy 109 • MERIDIAN AVENUE PRESERVING MATURE CANOPY One of a major component of the City's response to climate Meridian Avenue's right of way width is currently 70-feet Separately,the need to raise Meridian Avenue is directly ' change is the raising of the street to a minimum elevation it.h - • I • •, . wide and provides two 11-foot vehicular travel lanes, 2 in conflict with the existing canopy trees that create the of+3.7 feet. The need to raise streets poses several f y4 - 8-foot wide curbside parking strips,2-foot curb and gutters, corridor's unique all&experience. Because the roadway challenges,the most challenging of all being how the new • _ 'I an 8-to 9-foot landscaped swale and a 6-foot sidewalk, and the sidewalks are separated by the tree-planted swale, street elevation will interface with an already-existing and - all centered within the available space. The existing raising both will inevitably mean that something has to be ..r �:, built-out environment. Not only do new street elevations .,. „, continuous,8-ft minimum planting swale has provided the done about the trees,as the elevation of the tree at its base v. need to contend with impacting private properties that v, • conditions for the canopy trees to strive and grow to their is essentially statically-set in place. Because these trees are remain at the existing elevations,ensuring that drainage - mature extent of significant environmental and cultural value,eliminating is adequately kept from running off onto private property l'' the trees is simply not an option that should be considered and impacting ADA access between the properties and thej; The City's adopted Transportation Master Plan establishes or recommended. As a result,this case study seeks to right-of-way. Elevated streets,because of their need for two standards that underscore the approach to balancing maintain the trees in place and suggest a solution on how ' harmonization with adjacent properties,can cause havoc the needs of climate change adaptation for future to work around their existing locations and elevations. on existing urban trees and natural resources. One such i' improvement plans adopted by the City,without sacrificing example is Meridian Avenue. -- ' the uniqueness of Meridian Avenue: The strategy being presented through the case study is based on the following observations: A quick look at an aerial view of the City's South Beach The master plan identifies Meridian Avenue as belonging to • The decision on how to approach the conflicts between area reveals the uniqueness of Meridian Avenue. Among , - . , nr a categorytermed"Bicycle&Pedestrian Priority Corridors", existing,established mature trees and the need to raise all the gridded streets,Meridian Avenue stands out as the ` - t �'^ wherein it proposes two typical sections for right-of-ways streets and provide for grey infrastructure should not most dense,vibrant and continuous green spine of mature \ j; of 50 and 60 feet in width. Both typical scenarios identify be one that is solely focused on the efficiency of the canopy in the city. The canopy is predominantly made up : ,,`l^ 11-foot travel lanes and 7-foot parking strips parallel to a most optimally-designed drainage system.The solution of Calophyllum brasiliense(Brazilian Beautyleaf)trees that - . - -,r 2-foot curb&gutter.The variants between the 50-and 60- should he one that recognizes the performative value have been in place for decades with DBH measurements i . r;' foot versions is the provision of protected bike lanes versus of large canopy trees to absorb stormwater in the ranging from 45 inches to over 72 inches. Almost all , - bike lanes that are placed between the vehicular travel lane process of evapotranspiration,balanced against what of the existing trees are considered Heritage Trees of , . ' . , and the parking strip in the narrowest of the two options. is the acceptable delay before the control of recharge a unique and specimen condition. The trees, beyond - - -. This case study seeks to provide a suggestion on how the is achieved-the latter of which would be supported by providing outstanding annual environmental benefits �• prioritization of Meridian Avenue as an important bicycle grey infrastructure as a fallback strategy- (1965 gal/yr of storm water filtration and 260 lbs/yr of , - and pedestrian corridor can be achieved consistent with • The exposure of tree roots to the potential of saline carbon sequestration-compared to a an average of 649 - the plan. ground water should be factored to determine the gal/yr and 133 lbs/yr,respectively,provided by a typical, ' long-term, ultimate survivability of any existing tree established tree),they are a great source of pride to the * ' - The master plan addresses the need for parking as a in question. The specific unique characteristics of the community,emblematic of an intimate, residential scale • i!,: critical consideration that impacts the design of streets specie in question should be taken into account, in the quality that only exist in that single location within the City. ( and the transportation infrastructure. Specifically, specific condition of Meridian Ave,Brazilian Bea utyleaf As.such,this case study seeks to investigate a method by1, Meridian Avenue provides a significant number of curbside trees'roots can somewhat withstand exposure to saline which the raising of the elevation of Meridian Avenue can y residential parking spaces,half of which will be negatively groundwater. be performed without the need to adversely impact the impacted by the need to raise the elevation of the corridor, • The reduction in parking spaces can be mitigated by the cultural significance of the corridor. When considering the impact of future improvements on development and construction of new parkinggarages, parking and the existing trees,both cannot remain equally as recommended in the Transportation Master Plan, unscathed;one has to be impacted. The position of this predominantly Mr residents immediately impacted investigation is that,because transportation and mobility by the area. This is a critical recommendation, as are largely a factor of lifestyle decisions and because reduced on-street parking requirements provide increasing numbers of individuals are opting for ride- for greater flexibility in designing for adaptation. sharing in lieu of the owning a vehicle,the case study will Additionally, raising streets fronting parcels with propose that the higher priority be placed on the existing shallow front setbacks eliminates the opportunities for . . trees,as such parking spaces will be eliminated as a part of properties to adequately accommodate and access the 10' the strategy. development of off-street parking on their lots. • • MERMAN AVENUE 110 City of Miami Beach -age 1034 of 1578 Urban Forest Master Plan 2020 • y Iet • _ • u ,, •fir-.yam—_1R~._ � I.�111 i lf".1 u ` .2� •••••,,,',,,•.•..•••P a C. ., ...+.. lr f� r r. • . a 1 • 1. 14 -�, �E ;-fix , 11 At• ,11167r, „„.,,:f. �, � h , l , -- .'-'''4:; It-,'"' • \ 1._ rte„ - �-s- • • Urban Calxgiy'Tcrdkit' •age t o Tree Planting-An Uthan Strategy 111 • The following assumptions were made: • ft assumes that Meridian Ave will need to he raised a total of 4 feet as part of its adaptation strategy.Because the predictions of the ultimate impact of sea level rise and climate change are dynamically changing,the case study assumes a worst-case scenario situation. While • 'r- this scenario may be more than what is currently being contemplated,it serves the purpose of forcing the need for innovation in design to meet the challenges in a manner tha t can he adapted to many different situations "' "' •-trr along the corridor. ✓ 1 • It assumes that the cultural and environmental value of -, __ the existing mature tree stock is such that it will remain in place. It assumes that a one-size-fits-all strategy is i� �_ incompatible w'iththe needs toinnovate and roengineer ' , a custom solution for this unique condition.gir 4' ® Readily- available typical sections in both the Transportation ® Master Plan (adopted 2016) and the Street Design l Guidelines(adopted 2016)were analyzed and found to ® be insufficient for their application in climate change 0 ,.,u 0 adaptation. • It assumes that while the need to adapt to climate r, change is a dynamically,complex one,the opportunities �r 0ftilitr> to engineer solutions to meet the future design criteria "mit: can be must implementable if they employ or modify ;II ti I •;pit>� }yr 0 ` acceptable standard construction methods already O! w ...q1'...f © k7, ,••a_ y to-place and adopted by various agencies,such as the s © •, - `="Dr' 6"I No Il,r ydm r� jrr Florida Department of TransporGrtion. This facilitates • , u..Y •,, qu.. t q the use ofa readily-acceptable sta n dards that a re trusted r z s.. - • .." by agencies and professionals whose recommendations 4 ai a'I r=''4,-,-i are subject to liabilities,and it provides a basis upon `° q !`, llr`v , t• Q I which to prognosticate the cost impact of such complex yM O,• a1 c. =, �C —to' engineering strategies. ."h,..0,-.:':'�c".�j r�t°SIIre ll.°n � r , O° LEGEND f a '•`' : e •1,' a Lrtw•J t•• L4° 1 ?)•Q4V{. 1. Retaining wall rt"ar,.!.....,,...30.11,),,,...7„..4,. 4 y© , i 1;11 a 14,M1 i i� � uv. .I 2. Modified FDOT Index 5 20 gravity wall 1: r r 41 3. Modify gravity wall top to ensure 5-foo t ADA access .W. : 1'• • "• .f.,. bi R l'� y„ 4. Pervious concrete slab 5. Pervious asphalt or concrete drainage layers y a ai - 4,tl'�,•..;',, or _•,r' 6. 2-inch diameter PVC drain 7. Pervious asphalt �,r •' t y. va4aa,, illi,„,1B1 til 8, FOOT Type 0 2-foot Curb and Gutter • t;'.+„ rl 9. Custom tree grate,measured to specifics of each tree t .1.;,.... 10.Concrete slab .. .NI;ii.,. 11.Bioswale 12.Access sidewalk connector to parking spaces 13.Landscape planting area 14.Curbside parking strip 15.4-foot wide bike lane 16.2 qty,11-foot travel lanes 17.Crown-raise low branches(not shown) 112 City of Mivm Clench -age I '•O • Urban Forest Master Plan 2020 :•_:C. 1, i..h t * �. -Oillgiel rI I' 4 ;4' if.T�� ,. f L. .4- jam . K 7 BIO-SWALE DETAIL,LEADS STORM WATER TO TREE PIT 46 ht •Y r ! _- — .. r 'i • 'dy , PROVIDE SEATING AND HARMONIZATION FACING FLAMINGO PARK VIEW ALONG CENTERLINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY Urban Canopy Twlklt' 898 t o Trac Planting-An Urban Strategy 113 • • • • �, ,�f 1 ' Se • • ,}' ik. ' •"...P.- .i, p .` f 1111 .r • • • • lilliiiilli • • :41 • • • • • 1Ea►''i r, e f rNiect. ,yam •' / . _ y AL . ...= • f 1 • • • • • ` lilt' r2l 1. : URBAN TREE ZONE SOIL CELLS AND PAVEMENT SUSPENSION SYSTEMS ' 'fills toolbox seeks to reinterpret the sidewalk and fronting street infrastructure These recommendations employ the use of different technologies to create - - • areas as an Urban Tree Zone,focused on impacting the choices,construction the necessary adaptation within the Urban Tree'Zone to luster long-term tree . ... and assembly of these areas to establish conditions that are most fiwnlable survivability. These are described as follows: for tree growth. Short-term savings can be gained by not implementing any of • ' ' these recommendations at the time of initial design and construction;however, , Sail Cell Systems: Soil cells are engineered electing to not implement these recommendations will negatively impact theassemblies that facilitate the transfer of weight ultimate,prolonged costs associated with the lifetime of the improve'mentsinthe 11/W and force onto a compacted base,while creating form oiincreased maintenance costs,repair:utd unfavortblegrowingconditions substantia!areas of un-compacted soils for plant for the trees,which can lead to disease,conditions wrought with liabilities and growing medium. They look like egg-crates with diminished opportunities to capitalize on the benefit of trees. As such, installed in the ground and then filled with this toolbox serves as a design guideline and lays out recommendations at the planting medium. The different units can be time of building-nut the Urban Tree Zone to facilitate the incorporation of all the interlocked,and like logo-pieces,the assemblies competing needs vying for space within the right•o!way.while still providing can be expanded to any arca to meet the specific for optimum conditions for long-term tree growth and survivability. One of the needs of the project.All soil culls are compression growth of trees(when compared to soil cells),structural soils are best-suited key indicators in the analysis provided earlier in this document demonstrates elements; therefore it is needed to perform for compacted soils beneath hardscape improvements that are completely the low percentage of old,mature trees that exist throughout the City,possibly substantial excavation of the existing soils to the desired depth.which is then surrounded by l.iige amounts of tut-compacted soils and pervious areas. An because the recommendations put forth in this'tactics'section have not been compacted,and upon which the soil cell units are installed and interlocked, example of a structural soil manulaactnrer/provider is the patented structural implemented. This has created conditions where trees have been planted in filled with on-compacted soil,and finally topped with the desired hardscape or soil mix patented by Cornell University,termed CU-Structural Soil. (Average inhospitable areas that do not facilitate for long-term growth. pavement material.Because of all the excavation needed in circler to make room Estimated Cost,Installed(FY2019):$27.50/CY) fur the assemblage,soil cells are best suited for new construction areas or for SOIL VOLUMES areas where existing trees will not he impacted. Soil cells provide the greatest These diIfere atsystems do not measure•up equally when it comm to soil volume The ultimate goal of defining the articulation of the Urban Tree Zone is the amount of un-compacted soil volume. Examples of soil cells are many,hut the provisions. According to lames Urban,"value engineering recommendations provision of adequate soil volumes to allow trees to grow and mature. lames most well-known brands are Silva Cells byUecpRoot.StrataVaultand RoolSpace to substitute equal volumes.of Structural Soil for [soil cells I should not he Urban,an authority on conducting research on urban tree growth conditions, by t reenBlue.(Average Estimated Cosi,Installed(FY2019):$44.70/CY) accepted. Designers must-assure that the products be designed and bid based stales that the typical urban tree needs more than 1000 cubic feet of loam soil - on the amount of soil within the system, nut the overall volume of material in order to grow for prolonged periods of(line. It is important to mite that - 4 Pavement Suspension Systems: Pavement being installed. 100 cubic feet of[soil cells]will require 400 to 500 cubic feet having adequate and ample soil volumes that facilitate areas for nu-compacted 6..- systems are best described as of structural soil to provide fur equal tree growth. With the typical urban tree rout growth areas is not an'encouraged'or a'desired'condition-it is a critical methods to suspend hardscape and pavement needing more than 1,Otii cubic feet is loam soil.where space is at a premium. requirement. Additionally,because a large part of the soil substrate that stakes „,�p,',,, improvements to be installed on soils that lack there may not he sufficient rooms to install enough structural soil to equal the up Miami Heach is fill that was dredged front the local region's lime rock;these the structural cohesion and qualities to support amount of soil provided in the[soil cell]design.” deep pockets of natural soil do not exist. This is coupled with the fact that the - the planned improvements. Initially, it was , natural growth habit of local, native maritime vegetation has a root-growth developed as a method to construct roadways INDEXED URBAN TREE ZONE BUILD-OUT SCENARIOS: structure that tends to be shallow. As such,the recommendations provided and sidewalks on unsuitable soils, eliminating •I'he various scenarios provided are indexed and named so they are easily should not to be cunsulered as a strive for tate'optimum but rather what is the need to excavate,remove and replace the soils identified with the various typological conditions they were created for 'essential'to meet a baseline metric. Alternatives are provided where they arc and reducing construction costs. One adaptive, based on a 4-part naming convention. The following describes the various merited,given each unique condition. lastly,it should he noted on the graphic beneficial use of the system is in the construction abbreviations used: provided below that the potential for stormwater storage in sail used in soild of new or expansion of roadways,walkways and other pavement areas where cell systems can equal as much as 50%of the overall soil volume. trees are already existing instead of excavating underlying areas to install beds R I I 6 _ + P R KG of compaction-suitable material,pilings are driven in a systematic grid format HOW MUCH SOIL TO GROW A BIG TREE? and topped with formwork upon which the desired pavement is installed. - . . . The pilings essentially transfer the weight of the topping pavement clown into ground,similar to piling foundations in building construction. The benefit of' C. Identifies the width Identifies if curbside _ the system lies in that the 1i1 maps are thriven into the ground with a minimized disruption of the existing root networks ofnearbyor abutting trees.An example l•°rttnuercialStreet of the sidewalk arca parking is provided of this system is the Cu poles brand system developed by Pon tarola Engineering. (defined as the arca or not as a part cif the (Average Estimated Cost,Installed(FY'201N):$15fi.t1l1/SY) R I V between the' hack of fronting Urban 'free curb or gutter and the Zone. Residential Street, Urban property line). These • • - Structural Soil Systems: Structural soils are a specific, usually patented, Quality "" are provided with , soil mix that combines planting medium with various sized aggregates. 'the e+ dimensions in ran I aggregates allow for compaction of the soils,while creating gaps in between the R I$ 6 " ,, ..„ aggregate material to house organized planting medium and for tree routs to Residential Street, ,,",.,„1,,,,,,Kw,art bra:!,n,:,,,:,,'-.,,:r„a„�;,r'r,r,m,,,,,,l.,.,,,, take place. While not the best Si.facilitating the most optimum condition for the' Sub-urban Quality ISrI'.rr Carman•'ILouw' 'age L 'a . •hrhar:T;cares-Methods hoc Planru:e:'I'roes in,M.:a:ri 1h-oil:Specific Cund,nnm 11S .,.... .„ C I ...6 1 + PRKG . ..,,,., . . . . . ,... ,. i ' .„,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,.,,::.„,,„,„,.i.„..„,„,,,„,:„,„,,:,..„If „ GPI! ,,,,. , COMMERCIAL.STREET FRONTAGE `-.1,',6.;• -4-7.',...4:4'-%•..:. lh:� { . 1 WIDTH LESS THAN 0-FEET : t `�' WITH CURB-SIDE PARKING L.', 1d Ilpiiiiliiiryr$1,: . V x„ •. i ~:i `'' :-,i....,,,,o,.. . ,F ., '''. \,lilliar ' r Kra. T 1 r... • I si • � � r •1 X j`1 fi 1 :� 3 = l m t ,t 4...r.:.::::',,..--,':,. .+.sp .%, .,„...".•..4.,' .....i.,:„.:l'4 v ,f,• .1'4 ,YAd,il..... oy..: ;4•:d.=:y,:rd... . .11 -,I--„s, ..v";=,I.,.:,/,,,,... 14„. !Fit r.B,s : ,r,I . ff iq :i; -r°i„ -.P; Y"••f�.v !r ,0 J°V• 0:0!T F '•1;:.'0 ti T q.. ". . .11: _. • ••�,,;t;,my t i•.• `.., •^.,..., .,-i40,,, i� �� + : ,4 tii.,NK: .. : 116 ::µc,.•}Cyto iiraa k•. Page 1040 of 1576 l rh..r.I.rest?1.i':cr Place C20 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [13]-Parking arca may be constructed out of pervious Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil{:ell concrete instead of asphalt. This could he installed Ail small-sized Trees that can achieve a minimum System directly over the soil cell system,eliminating the clearance of 7 feet and compact,medium-sized trees • Minimum Soil Volume Required: need for a roadway sub-base l 5 in that specific area such as: • 1,(100 dor uncornpaeted soil per tree; and allowing any runoff to percolate directly into the Green Buttonwood • 70(1 do(uncompacted soil per paha uncumpacted solid area where the tree's roots could Glaucous Cassia • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume absorb water and possibly help to filter any pollutants • (:rape Myrtle may he reduced by 20%if soil volume areas are it may carry. Pigeon Plum shared by two trees/palms or more 2. [2]-Portions oldie curb and gutter could be • Spanish Stopper • Suitability: Hest suited for medium shade trees andconstructed using pervious concrete to allow for palms runoff to he directed directly to the tree pit and the ';dols; • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Dense and tr'ee's ruotball, • Thatch Palm compact •3. [1]-Concrete slab could he replaced with pervious • Hurricane Palm • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting concrete and installed directly unto the soil cell Hucaneer Palm asphalt area:Yes,Minimum 8 feet wide system,eliminating the need lin'a slab sub-base]4]. • Foxtail Palm • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Recommended 4. [H]-Utilities could be installed beneath the parking • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water strip capture strip:Required • Irrigation:Permanent,Required ' LEGEND i 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk �� Y ;,, 3'• a•,.' •'•�11 .�, 4ti+• 2. Concrete Curb + If 1'' 3. Curb Pad I, A O '' ; ' ;'(- 4. Slab Sub-base h,. , 5. Roadway Sub-hose 0. Tree 7. Tree Critical Ruutha]l Area O O B. Underground[utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering 10.Soil Suspension System de ,.' "" Oka' 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix 0 ®I O- 12.Perforated Pipe l '. $ �•,.a ,J i:i.Asphalt Paved Area ti `[ v Y 'Y tk':•° © :` ,til �I"` 1 ° i;. Tom'' }•s ;rte•••''% �, �.!: .. . * 77r ,.,r-. ... ...•.- �d _-Z YZ ,,.1: -tru~'e'' i. 11..4't• : .., i 11 n l?. 4...:,. • :••, - ._,0 '�' .i.v.�''''•-•• 44i.. 741-7,.- ic'� Jv� t ,';' r vre 44'i�/• l .r.. .-i-ti •�'i- rr • w• •r• • •i ; %:;,.*1. *71'. '.".;:..1',04411,,t. - ;lr R[f +•4;` ``-i•i.,.. ..?'�^.:3'4 F''''•:. +r� ` 7 ;' Z- Prban l'.uwlrc'.ival:n' -age a' '.',Iran'Gn tic,.'1rllmds I,,r?luting'l rres in''.a:ta Hc.,ch SPrci0cl.unduuau 117 xi i, r ' C -6 -PRKG �, u� .. .,1. . "{ ,IgrIf i/,.`" ,hu4111N�"4�,1�Iry i�NY� �A°°W %, ,, ry f COMMERCIAL STREET FRONTAGE F.WIDTH LESS THAN 6-PEET �II1NNiP1111,�N,7�I�� rl�+lip,;.," ,�. WITHOUT CURBSIDE PARKING1. .. �. F"• u� 1 N ,kid,y., k a re *yr lir ‘*41" 0 , iiille I •.-` I � y il slam/"•, i,!I T,411 iw�.�:' =.,,. ... . PII �� : -i ..mr'�'et_ 4 �u7 °I1' nF ...4.., :Ww;+s 17.;.11:C.7:'''..!7: w,.1:7. rLF\ 9 �1 '''I". � VI . :a: l .�'a ^ ' -•� iy' ".� `t ... • rr7. � i- "j • , • • 1�t r a' _a . R*i*�9�♦� . t;^\ det z: i ` :• • •,' r .' �htlur Af. ^IXyeG • ' _e., Iv•••/- Mw* y. 'I '111!9::r,1‘.. � 1 't'..'',ii'.?" lc, A ti S. : ,..!..-1;,IrI.yu - Ia, u., i i.., , 0 ,' b l 1 1 _r� l,i,I `• . : w r Page 1042 of 1576 1rn:w ru r,•a Maslor 1'1 LB)0211 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [13]-Bike Lane area may be constructed out of 'frees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell pervious asphalt instead of asphalt.This could be • All Small-sized Trees that can achieve a minimum Systemmetalled directly over the soil cell system,eliminating clearance of 7 feet and compact,medium-sized trees • Minimum Soil Volume Required: the need!Or a roadway sub-base]5]in that specific such as: • 1,000 of of uncurnpacted soil per tree; area and allowing any runoff to percolate directly into • Green Buttonwood • 700 cf of uncompacted soil per palmthe uncompacted solid area where the trees roots • Glaucous Cassia • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume could absorb water and possibly help to filter any • Crape Myrtle may he reduced by 10%if soil volume areas are pollutants it may carry. Pigeon Plum shared by two trees/palms or inure 2. [21-Portions of the curb and gutter could be • Spanish Stopper • Suitability: Best suited for medium shade trees and constructed using pervious concrete to allow for palms runoff to he directed directly to the tree pit and the Palms: • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Dense and tree's rnotball• Thatch Palm compact 3. [I I-Concrete slab could be replaced with pervious • Ilurricaue Palm • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting concrete and installed directly onto the soil cell • Bucaneer Palm asphalt area: Yes,Minimum 8 feet wide system,eliminating the need for a slab sub-base[4[. • • (oxtail Palm • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Recommended 4. (H] Utilities could be installed beneath the hike lane. • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Required • Irrigation:Perm:ment,Required • LEGEND • - • i 1 l• p,• AI. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk !�—gym.... :w. r > 1 2. Concrete Curb uo,rierdt' 0 r c: t- 3. Curb Pad • . g" 4. Slab Sub-base :,. -_, 5. Roadway Sub-base 6. 'Free 7. Tree Critical Routball Area O O 8. Underground Utilities(Wrapped is Root Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering 10.Soil Suspension System 0 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix [• :1-:"'--. ,•-'•.-, w 1 12.Perforated Pipe ''''t.'''''''� ® 0 r- 13.Asphalt Paved Area �'1 J .e J 0 a e. 7"-• �4r N t 2fft..•i• yg IJ °:4 N�`y��I r � y ..4..0,':':1'�',. J. i :',,.:i. • "+ i-44d ,,„:„ 1... rltir' `.3 M':_' A"' -.1:::::.ir. .. • :74:"4.!-1,,,,-,-7:7-1, 4 ,:.' .-,� �•r-44� �R l " i. i -mopw 0 ': .q�5 A' ; •^ .. O I �R r ,'V..4. + ;] 7 w jj ,, + ,r- -..,t r '1w.3 .r.I,,l'`r." it,!•• ' _ .s '"' `11,;", • � ,..�!l� ,,r�! i a herr _""n:. .L. 9 ..CF Vie...,. :s!7-.,...;„,,,;?:,;'..1.r•'� •• r ;x Page 1043 of 1576 Pi h.e.(..ee,py•'.”et,d• ::rba,:':r,:n r meil•,I>Ivr i lanlu:n:1 rrv,In 4:::::w Beach spe,,fit't:ontin,nui. 114 C16-1OI � PRKG ' }.. V F }Y y 41 it ra "4�iVI II,J " ,, . COMMERCIAL.STREET FRONTAGE H r >� ��.�''t1 1 WIDTH GREATER THAN 0-FEET BUT LESS THAN 10 FEET `'_ I up hPdu N�' c `' ,,� �„'�Iry,� lthhlr WITH CURB-SIDE PARKING a' a�.n1tU;.e : tr ( 'i .• • 1 I..ciiiiiL . .' 1 ,„ Iv: ,. r + t �.: `. .. = y x."/,'",. i '.......^,"6 -i:-'-tit.::.p " r ;•',T" ', yt ♦ f E . r, K ` Pm. .1..-' eF ti"'[. -- -;.'J''', , . -. ciljentitex . . ,, . . . Lv i : _ gip, •,� .,„-;;;.•t.i f �P r au�,.r�E+'. u: �;',"`kY«� gg��.i+:� Y E.,:,. ,`r lnq�._�;r, s� n /R�' R ''Si' .7^•*i R.y p -i:i. '+`A 11 ultry'r dl it a. i .� k e' +yk 'T !. i , u+ ,,,, rp; � ,n ,, ; . i ..-, . -,,,..61, ...,••,. i '...e.. ..:„..... ....„ ....11.1k. r� ic " " e.� _ - *�. r 120 City o`?1r.1rai Butte Page 1044 of 1576 01han Purest Md.tin'r Plan 21120 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green infrastructure:Required1. [121-A portion of the parking area may be Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell constructed out of pervious concrete instead of All medium-sired species,without exception System asphalt.This could he installed directly aver the soil • Minimum Soil Volume Required: cell system,eliminating the need for a roadway sub- Palms: • 1,000 cfof unconipactcd soil per tree; base 151 in that specific area and allowing any runoff Palms with short-length fronds,such as: • 700 cl of uncampacted soil per palm to percolate directly into the uncumpacted solid area • Lantana Palm • Allowances for soil volume reduction: tool volume where the tree's roots could absorb water and possibly • Cabbage Palm may be reduced by 30V/,if soil volume areas are help to filter any pollutants it may carry. • foxtail Palin shared by two trees/palms or more 2. 121-Portions of the curb and gutter could be • II Palm al m • Suitability: Hest suited for medium shade trees constructed using pervious concrete to allow fon • Thatch Palm • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading runoff u1 be directed directly to the tree pit and the • • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting tree's roothall. asphalt area:Yes.Minimum 4 feet wide 3. 1111-Utilities could be installed beneath the parking • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged strip • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • Irrigation:Permanent,Required .brY ° LEGEND Jr: 4 s >r tom...w .>S. • 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk c„_-i.' # _ 2. Concrete Curb wil 3. Curti Pad l`.G�',1O 4. Slab Sub-base Y� 5. Roadway Sub-base I 6. 'free 7. Tree Critical[football Area 0 B. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Harrier) • 9, Pervious Aggregate Covering �t,myr,� ,T I0.Soil Suspension System �Y„..„.....4..,,...m.„ V't'd••A'M'rw ..) 11.Amended Soil Planting 41ix •,,.....m,..,‘,.• :a Z � -.�;� y ® 0 12.AsphaltPavedArea Oft�; o "°,- y9„u � . ,, i (i ,AIN-111311„,, , ,....,....,,,.,01,,k,-..:,,,,,,,••••,.....,,,,,,,t- , Fr0• 1 -. t! h, • `4 1, �'i'� .P',:;li: • .1,t•:.'•,•,,••••••'!....-. ~6 !u,u. r +r. ✓ ,r +7- .,y tit rd't i "r�r ":;rl`:"•'-',. _ •:;•••:,,;........•r .� • ,:.1:7 ::,:::•':4.,:-,; .:•,,.. .'r'*rn• p . ' ' ; '4�lM1Fi +n,ur:'�.rrl•:'''....°•!4..:• .. - ;..�.•i , �' '7'......'•o-�„{r,• f\t t;4.lY. roti ..,..1....11k.".”R7 • ,-.>u 4"aT. «..t• r. - • • I Irban Canvey"I'uhdktt Page 1045 of 1576 VI Lan'lit its•Methods lar i l.m:ing'I'rer,ill Miami Be.rch tiyrc.ilc Cordn:onn 121 r 4 k• c 6101 - 1 ,. . .. , f E . �'"' 1.. ':111'22..:1;:11'.. , COMMERCIAL. • STREET FRONTAGE ,' ; a �. �y'�+ WIDTH GREATER THAN 0-FEET BUT LESS THAN 10 FEET c� '° `��' ' f WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING r .-... .., nc • r r•,•. " d017xe DNiyy llrtf4 ' IN 1V 4 . - ,.fir ^v a rt j 1 1p • yr` '' D`l ��y • • • • ' ou if prl a y"r�':1 s I ' +r r f? L IT' 1,1'.f S� 1.111...1....*. i Z4 i , Y. , } :v,..,,,,:, rIql61y !..:"_,t. , ti • ' • • ..„, ,x ; .. • 041%.,il Nit � ..+.rP }, : y , • fltik ,„ yY' *NfA • t ti ro „ q •fy • .4 l, . 1 . . _ iv�:�r'^r : .t+:'dk1,� S'L`j Y ;,,z., d -. Fn . ' LLP . ii!,;L!1 •I • 121 City u1'Mialm lfeaah -age i•0 • lFrt.dr.F,rrsl Maslrr I'I 2(1211 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [12J-The bike lane may be constructed out of Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell pervious asphalt instead of regular asphalt.This • All medium-sized species,without exception System could be installed directly over the soil cull system, • Minimum Soil Volume Required: eliminating the need fora roadway sub-base[SI in Paints: • 1,000 cfofuncompacted soil per tree; that specific area and allowing any runotf to percolate • AI]-allowable species,without exception • 700 cf of uncompacted soil per palm directly into the uncumpacted solid area where the • Allowances for soil volume reduction:total volume tree's roots could absorb water and possibly help to may he reduced by 30%if soil volume areas are filternty pollutants it may carry. shared by two trees/palms or inure 2. [21-Portions oldie curb and gutter could he • Suitability: Hest suited for medium shade trees constructed using pervious concrete to allow for • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading ninon-to be directed directly to the tree pit and the • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting tree's:ootball. asphalt area:Yes,Minimum 4 feet wide 3. [8]-utilities could be installed beneath the bike lane • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • Irrigation:Permanent,Required • . ,I4111LEGEND 'e .� . I. (:orico-te or Paved Sidew-alk .., . r • . 2. Concrete Curb uc + . 0 O 3, Curb Pail 0 lqiit7 Cii'iii'':. 7,r 4. Slab Sub-base t. 5. Roadway Sub-base • 6. Tree 7. 'Tree Critical Ruotball Area o P 6 8. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering 10.Soil Suspension System 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix ® © a"" Pit 12.Asphalt Paved Area ,t v1 i w �• ', "lo.:,:'© t r 3.'ten .+�.c.+..nn ki. %'::,:t ;�� :K.fot;y,. 'I f• _I`..'.- Yi' ',y .Ir ^". $J•.n=. j 7,�"f i��7tiR' 4.i�,.eJ E,t: ••••,:".;-:',.,' 4'a. •;r•.1.;..• - �. .t •'�+-•`w . • • • • • t ,•04, ---'.� Rt. .S.`L:... .. • i ., .•'' - • riban f,rngy'.i:,,d4rt' age •' ,rh.rr."'.as.,-?h•thnd+lvii')arcute'!'n•v,in»:.mu He.r.it Spccfii tm:JS.uu.i t23 ,. . ,,:,...1. CI + 1OI + PRKG . • .. . , �•..• •.• • ' _ .. . .. .... .•. .. .,:. . .. . . ...,,. • .. ••••• • . COMMERCIAL STREET FRONTAGE r' � ':A WIDTH GREATER THAN 10-FEET ' ' . ' WITH CURB-SIDE PARKING iY °.....::- r,. i r Ili lirl lir '' f ' 1 ifu .0 T FIA rt .,,r - �.•'sd k1,.., b '1y�'f°I•I°� 1,-�I .�•I. QTY. "� ' ^ L +1r.:.'d, uCl'.1µ r -, AlJ, q• RIA1 I''."' '�'I'd r • • _tr". 'yT�" hK. . .'1:'.t.'...... - • 1 �. ♦ •' CJI '�i ,y- r L trffij j Z' f"''l" .. ,.4,.:'1'• +,♦.��•�f►�+ ,/,,•,..!1......;Pflit..-•, •r.eY. r r•. 'S. • eit 41, 1`z" 19v * - E tit? x W 94";„'4 11 I! ,-, rdi ...... . • r.,•' •'4.;-.'t'°••.m• '. • FII 1't'• ;�u .0.41:1414#„,.. I�ai�f T.1', v.-.••':'. Irrlutill4 Yd iII,, IN iYr. - d.lr 0011;.c. Cy F.� l 'i t•v ,'"' -mow' �f S ' A.N i airy illi. µil:w dl CIy:�y� a °xm ;a., : i'�•�f• r l �}:At...:.!..,..... ku ' .■ . ♦ .i. e7" a oi.... '. .1=,..!.-4..v.,1,,,,,,--21.. ti♦ �A_ 'L 41.4-. .n._ it 1♦ f •'ff .` •�I ..:y.s::1;::III1,° IIIl.. 12,1 City t.t M17 i.u:,i Brach age 1''0 1 i...,Parrst M:astm'Plait_'tftt1 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [111 Soil cells can be substituted with structural 'frees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell soils provided that the correct,equal volume of soil • All allowable species,except species with overly System is provided and a minimum of 50%of the concrete aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and • Minimum Soil Volume Required: sidewalk[1]is constructed out of pervious concrete Short•leaf Fig • 1,000 cf of uncompacted soil per tree; 2. 12]-Portions oldie curb and gutter could be 70(1 el of uncompacted soil per palm constructed using pervious concrete to allow for Palau; • • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume runoff to be directed directly to the tree pit and the • All allowable species,without exception may he reduced by 50%if soil volume areas arc tree's rootball. shared by two trees/palms or more • Suitability: Best suited for large shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • Irrigation:Permanent,Require • d a ° -1 ' ''''. Lt► • ,. LEGEND 4r r ' ri r � r r 'r 1 Concrete or Paved Sidewalk f *,,, . 4 ,•' ., ,I 1 u j2. Concrete Curh 0 A, 3. Curb Pad M1. Slab Sub•hast• `�9. O, ! .. , :, 5. S. Roadway Sub-base Wmpivr— ' 'i^ f. 'free t 7. Tree Critical Ruotball Area i 0v,.. yt 8. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) sr 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering t, 10.Soil Suspension System ll.Amended Sail Planting Mix ® © 12.Asphalt Paved Area �°:�.a.� rrr�l ,.., t 5• ,� ,T. .iT ^ .....k.:, ,k g. 1.. ,• ��y'•'!`::••: .---i- vim,{ �Q liqi ,. .4 9 �Nz T 1 M1;..-41-;::-.:: :,r-'4'. Jt `t 1��',,je.,.,. 1�Ihi. 0• jt.4! '-.1.,:!;:'d..,,2•••417; 111 J ,• $uk,r'°l; 41 ,u,• e-'sur,„ a r<Jt .at. r"aaAm .: , r...1 r iIt•::tii lga*'�vei.w 'Jf•Pa+ne°'c.,. ti ;ti,; r 1. 1Og,,:!,..:,-,,;7thtt,A''wog `,+ i .:7 „�4"114L`'a5 Vti '� 10 J4'.1iCVn . • .iil.e.-.. ..• .. _ .., ' ^. .. . , .. Page 1049 of 1576 :Jr'b:m'i,i,tics Mol,:xk r.u:'lan:rrr,:'1 rtes u,N::a:,u Head,Spi.r.lx C,.r.d:::.:m 125 ..„ ..C + 10 -PRKG .. + COMMERCIAL STREET FRONTAGE , . . ,,o. ,_ 7..,...,...... .. . .. ... . .., .., : • • WIDTH GREATER THAN 10-FEET •-— , :'� WITHOUT CURS-SIDE PARKING .) ;1 �' .v f n 1' illiai 1 I .,...” !4 \7(144 A. VIIIII.111. • • yy�� ; 4,,,_.......•V.I .�k. . AY,. • SSI Ff Ixtf. • ''.1Z) k7 • • • t 'j lY 9 �+ Y 11 t ;•: .a b"': i xI X1110 ?; 1 , .' •13'.114 p .!,,. . t,. 17 h • ;:ti.:'.::',;,-,J. .. .. ' . • •fesX�14 ~ h` rr. !a • 'isti E 'f . l30.. LA I . ' �n• ` ,,� t rNf•LA• � . -i` I yi ' n" ",,v. '4;.'"':•.%.-.,!.-.;' :'" -.. :,,• 4'--1.,-::;o...' -L'1•1;;.:,- .Ir :14: , f1" :' 4 14:ike,rTt>° 4. .r ,,•',......"1,1i,,,.1::•1.:."1:1...4".....7:;.."-,41,1±1..-".;• -•, .' .= : 4.` , .•E• . ,,fi = y f1lj �:` Irl ,'^ y "'fir•W.`, . , 'a t','•9 J.4 8 ... '..}W. '..fl",'yi:'I'' KJI ,ice}-y'T •• a+xliNi 14•.,- f Iii `,i,., :'•1iI'I 1 J 1 Vll�,yi�p if qd II .'•;,..1.' Niti• " )-; h:^ t�.4'11 .1{:_j�• .A. 146 ::113 of Miami Hnudi Page 1050 of 15(b ufnall Pur a h1.uu[cr PI.in 20211 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [11]Soil cells can be substituted with structural Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell soils provided that the correct,equal volume of soil • Al(allowable species,except species with overly System is provided and a minimum of 50%of the concrete aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and • Minimum Soil Volume Required: sidewalk[1]is constructed out of pervious concrete Short-lead Fig • 1,000 clot-unannpacted soil per tree; 2. [2]-Portions of the curb and gutter could he • 700 dot unannpeeled soil per palm constructed using pervious concrete to allow for Palms; • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volumerunoff to be directed directly to the tree pit and the • All allowable species,without exception may he reduced by 50%if soil volume areas are tree's ruutball. shared by two trees/palms or more • Suitability: Best suited for large shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • Irrigation:Permanent,Required -4';-. 4•1 LEGEND i f ww - 4 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk / `d '•`k:. I : S r d t 2. Concrete Curb _ ow �aay} K r ' " 3. Curb Pad + CO , fg 4. Slab Sub base i1h,; "" 0 11 r i. y s. Roadway Sub-base b. 'free °:, I. 7. Tree Critical Rootbell Area O . : ti 8. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering ( 10.Soil Suspension System 2. 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix .`1. ® " .a twt,,�rt6;w m lu+ros hill.eltAtic trry,_ 12.Asphalt Pawed Area + .."'*'—"*.*-;-4. 0'' 0 . :.a ,r,� a 1 tilJ;',.''.2, .:i to 3•" a , 'Z. © l ! ,.nc • •.�.44.: .1.1.4 s d5 a7":4,.•L'", X 4. ';t £., 'Pll"' ".t-r��;>, tyrr i 'wty O r; + ,� ..,,�.`„'.;�I 7.tr:,..r.'. l' ire; • •• :.1 1; :.Mme :';';',::::;4:4- •;. ' _ l• ,'% °LtrY'- t? i '!..;:..;t: R.l i .,IIsm* ; i-ai 1 mak. t ;z.,,,_' :,-:,.:,.H.- 1 .� :17;'...,;;;-=....- o4.2.1....3,4,-•;-;-:_,'.r.::41'.(%',,„'. Fage1051of1576 (Irbaa'trnth.+-tl,tlthis1:rt'6311:In•9n•rsm}::a:ta&•aahS,e;,h,turd".oris 127 t'rh,.:.t..taohy'::�:f,ir' t, 1 l.:1:11;,s,„.5:*,'2i.., 4..;•:;:',`„..:- . ,, RIU1 -61 1 + PRKG _ ..,1,0 ,,,44;,3 ..1.: ? i ;� RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE of . ,`' I, URBAN CONDITION • WIDTH LESS THAN&FEET WITH CURBSIDE PARKING , s Y' • •`� . * If M • WI/ I .; illirri., .� r i "''5Wf `JIN C r a ;:,H'.. n'W ; DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [13]-Parking area may he constructed out of pervious ''frees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell concrete instead of asphalt. This could be installed • Medium sized species,such as: System(Pavement Suspension System if abuttingdirectly over the soil cell system,eliminating the • Bridal Veil property has an existing tree with roots extending into need for a roadway sub-base 15]in that specific area • Shady Lady Black Olive the right-of-way) and allowing any runoff to percolate directly into the • Pitch Apple • Minimum Soil Volume Required: uncatnpacted soild area where the tree's roots could • Pigeon Phan 1,000'Sof uncompacted soil per tree; absorb water and possibly help to filter. •any pollutants • lapanese Fern Tree • 700 cf of uncompacted soil per palm it may carry. • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume 2. 12]-Portions of the curb and gutter could be Palms: may be reduced by 30%if soil volume areas are constructed using pervious concrete to allow firr • All allowable species,except those with fronds that shared by two trees/palms or more runoff to he directed directly to the tree pit arid the exceed 6 feet in length,such as Date Palms,Coconut • • Suitability: Best suited lite medium shade trees, tree's football. Palms,Bismarck Palms,and African Oil Palms depending on the setback of the fronting building 3. I I]-Concrete slab could be replaced with pervious • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Dense and concrete and installed directly unto the soil cell compact system,eliminating the meed fora slab sub-base(41. • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting 4. III]-Utilities could be installed beneath the parking asphalt area: Yes,Minimum 8 feet wide strip • • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged 1. 1101 Soil cells can be substituted with structural • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water soils provided that the correct,equal volume of soil capture strip:Required is provided and a minimum 01.50%of the concrete • Irrigation:Temporary Required:Permanent sidewalk[1]is constructed out of pervious concrete Recommended IF _ - _ .. LEGEND 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk • 5 Z. Concrete Curb :45 3. Curb Pod ....._ 1 C CO4. Slab Sub-base �; .. 5. Roadway Sub-base • 0 - . . 6. Tree 7. 'free Critical Rootball Area B. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) 0 _ - • 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering A•,,a � • 4 ar 10.Soil hSuspension System tem t ® O 11 Amended Soil Planting Mix .,a sY •.;.,•-;:--- 12.Pcrrtted Pito 13.Asphalt Paved Area gyp_ • -'Si `*",.s, lliI CIY'1h. � +tom©.LT. ,,.r. ii ' f � -• f . Cr. B.• .:n ` l , ~1. Y��Iii 1Ola1iikV ! n P C :. . , „.. „, : i yt .�5 +'y'Si3�;:i1�lte•i�. 'L•..it.t.. .r^•'••�:.'&-i�. � .. I:.hao.r.,,.gy•"o,:ik, Page 10530115!6 :il'ar:"Gn:1es•?L•th:Kls for..'i ananer Ices m S:.can IirshSp.•r:I,cCa:da:um 129 „,..,,,r.,.I....,•,,=,..-:!,.'11.,.'•••!"0....i, •,••'•' ''''''”•.... ., • , , ir.,„ ,, R U -6 PRKG �I•,..,11„,,,,,,„,..,,,::::,,,,,•IIVIfi.,, RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE . {i y; _ URBAN CONDITION t. WIDTH LESS THAN 6-FEET - ' WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING • •I ,. ti,. J ,' t..; .. �+ 44 • ;f . • it • ! .. '•:. \• '7';=?;14, — . 1fir L . • rr 1 �I y� r :;:::5:47::::,.;,'":1,: • iI::• y F" .a .• tl11,;,.1.-:„. ,��'t�glGlmy"IIA I�a r Ili 7. •ill' 7 .;:11,„• • ; .' ay III r..- ,, P} • it f� u. ,W"•i wC.4, , • +........: _. r1 Hyl I i a�`ir I"1"-; W.'i i* 91� .7•7•419',` 1.. - .X • • ''''''..2:1 w ak�W� '"i"r'*.*..tgi .�'C','V"R'•i4',a/2 ., sem n.. :14 b y r :9L"' j p _ar -•i a�, 6�,dia .,.._ fi ii•l!.."G d .' o�ieti, r sµrak a ry• I... 3,,, • ••VINX,,141,;-11 'I ,I`rah^'. 4.1, . i °''•a,, • ".' '417'.111":;.'''''. •'ii7M1 -.1iI,/ �.r�,1j•.• .,�I•••,...,,,--f'- .0 1 { 1�'. q db:'II '''L d iuT h InJ n, Y A� 17,^1 M1,.M1 •I: ' • • • • * • • • w 1a;P Cut•+d ftidrni Hcaeh Page f0b4 of lb(b I'rhan Pw v-tM. ier Plait 21120 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1 [13[-Hike Lane area may be constructed out of Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell pervious asphalt instead of regular asphalt. This • Medium sized•species,such as: System(Pavement Suspension System if abutting could he installed directly over the soil cell system. • Bridal Veil property has an existing tree with roots extending into eliminating the need for a roadway sub-base[51 in • Shady Lady Black Olive the right-of-way) that specific area and allowing any runoffto percolate • Pitch Apple • Minimum Soil Volume Required: directly into the unconipacted soild area where the • Pigeon Pluto • 1 000 ciof uncompacted soil per tree; tree's rooLs could absorb water and possibly help to • Milanese Perri Tree • 700 cf of uncwn]pacted soil per palm filter any pollutants it may Carry. • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume 2. [2[-Portions of the curb and gutter could he Palms: may he reduced by 30%if soil volume areas are constructed using pervious concrete to allow Mr • All allowable species,except those with fronds that sluiced by two trees/palms or more runoffto he directed directly to the ore pit and the exceed 6 feet in length,such as Date Palms,Coconut • Suitability: Hest suited for medium shade trees, tree's rootball. Palms,Bismarck Palms,and African Oil Palms depending on the setback of the Fronting building 3. [1)-Concrete slab could be replaced with pervious • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Dense and concrete and installed directly onto the soil cell compact system,eliminating the need fur a slab sub-base(4). • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting 4. 181-Utilities could be installed beneath the parking asphalt area: Yes,Minimum 0 feet wide strip • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Required • Irrigation:Temporary Required:Permanent Recommended I . _ LEGEND y •, . ,4 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk •. a m w ')�[ � .yam ✓. {. f T ,, 2. Concrete Curb _ vyi v 'O :i. Curb Pad —_.0 .__ ,- '": 4. Slab Soh-base Iv i I■ 5 Roadway Sub-base t 0 6. Tree 7. 'free Critical Routball Area . . It. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in hunt Harrier) O — 'I. Pervious Aggregate Covering ,00��„ 10.Soil Suspension System ® 0 ® Zirr0•C r 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix 12.Peribr,rtetl Pipe f t © •fic13.Asphalt Paved Area .y . i 4.41 ••'1/1•".Ir'kr-.pt•..:-.-'a�,�,r, y,'•."U.". .ry..+,".y" we.WA • *T••'•yi►., fn �'�'�' 3'i-�jw� •t•' ,.- '. '- F;. • Ma y apt^r55yy,'y :.y:,.. : w:'+':. "�. ,.,,elle • ".. tp11�Y 'til. .. r,.k GI@`i a I,o b,ea Cant Ty"..n:1+,1. Page JOSS OI TJ/b .'rt ,::at:u.•llrthis1s l I;c,:ic rt,ti m 1:a:es leach Sta t:,t:nn:t t,an 131 RIUI6-1OI + PRKG • W. RESIDENTIAL.STREET FRONTAGE 1 URBAN CONDITION . WIDTH GREATER THAN 6-FEET BUT LESS THAN 10 FEET WITH CURB-SIDE PARKING : -... .Y 'I SS . r . � e. ., p .rY_ L'. )j •• q � C 'v 'YIl j .-fri r•. %' i� .., -.� I ... ":..'• ...•j;;;,aiii. 3 :i:'""^'"...1'1,''' :�+ •i; l". '*'':M,'.,.11. 4 � ��i.:m'.• gra•. .'ia:. a".1�i Cyt •i' .'�e.,,A;.!,;M.t. :j:::::4 •;...' . ,;,. . ' 5;:'.. :,:"..i,..;V:"."ii3Ot."....ttit,...:..yr......„04,4-.. .. .. . i. • a a 132 city 0:MI I lI'ndrL Page 1056 of 1516 1 rbar.-a..•.t AI,,s:or ria.:acni DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. 1121-a portion of the parking area may be constructed Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell out of pervious concrete instead of asphalt. This • All allowable species,except species with overly System(Pavement Suspension System if abutting could he installed directly over the soil cell system, aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and property has an existing tree with roots extending into eliminating the need for a roadway sub-base[SI in Short•leaf Fig the right-of-way) that specific area and allowing any rtmul'fto percolate • Minimum Soil Volume Required: directly into the uncompacted solid area where the - Palms: • 1,000 cf of wrcompacted soil per tree: • tree's roots could absorb water and possibly help to • All allowable species,without exception • 7110 cf of uncontpacted soil per palm lifter any pollutants it may carry. • Allowances fur soil volume reduction: total volume 2. I2] Portions of the curb and gutter could be may he reduced by 30%if soil volume areas are constructed using pervious concrete to allow for shared byhyo trees/palms or more runoff to he directed directly to the tree pit and the • Suitability: Nest suited for medium shade trees tree's ruothall. • • Preferred tree canopy growth habit Spreading 3. IN-Utilities could he installed beneath the parking • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting strip asphalt area: Yes,Minimum 4 feet wide • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • irrigation:Permanent,Required . - . ' r LEGEND • y.- r Tt r, rW 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk K' ;; a 2. Concrete Curb > • 3. Curb Pad —9— '„11111'12,0I` 4. Slab Sub-bast, . P!„ • • - 5. RoadwaySuh-hose 06. Tree 7. Tree Critical Rootball Area O 0. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering 10.Soil Suspension System :,. 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix f -, r+ 1•.,- ® 0 O . ° 12.Asphalt Paved Area '-.Y:'-'.•-".....-• • fi ,n©4: _ liti u S 'ryj .r5 . t / •T ,X : . 0 all '..T.41" , ,6I� y 1'41d%y'.$1: ;!..,. i.';6t: ...: . s ''r„; ;t° .14. ter' ..a•. ��.w[�:��°�ti��".. �1,Rh.�"'� � ie^ ,4.1—,:•••;,••;.::.-•. w.J �^' "�`'''..',...:7'.!;' ,,,,,,,i• .. ,"G yn� of` T'$ rye • y • ' `mo..,, I y4iJ•.k` ,�__ r M,.nl Canopy"G,oll:Ir• Page 1057 of 1576 od,.nt glom,' Muth:xis for?Ian:Ins:'I'no.,in bl:.cn,lien S tiprntic Condition., 133 r ' sSQL d... ' , _ � _ 7 : � u RIUI6-1OI -PRKG � kk�! • thSL. W. 1 r4 3r ;.+ RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE r r ` i URBAN CONDITION • WIDTH GREATER THAN 0-FEET BUT LESS THAN 10 FEET . WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING `' ' ^ , '' Y 1• , �l 1-i.'�. h� M,rll'M iI'll'�II V . ',1;10116 11, It aW11-1.11111W1111- . . +Z .., Y. a. s^CIi,n *• °r ,4••I, '..� ,"6+ ?� .. qtr • r' t 1Yl ••r„ -af ci . t#7� • 1`..r — rd - - • 4. •• '.. .It` • p a; n rr y.+l.a tll ' Up. :y-' .1 .„+.rWj RT • , ii`I. 1 ';!`Tay .'." 1Z,''i..",•,.., --•..,,,,, E • - .a�1: •.n •", " .. v, i*O••�'I lk,.1,,,j i{ •4,,,rn!Ik,t'i" N W. a. it. :1_.:'•--,-LI:f....Of• ,.. ' „,',. ,.7:1V4"..'ist. ',1,4*-*li'4110,,,,,,k,.. ,,.._.,..,',- 1 :rF ' . : ;~ c.. 0 . • s • n n : • 1',: Ialy,.l M1auu Beach Pegg 1058 of 1576 urban 1.1 Master flan 211211 • DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required I. 112]-The bike lane may be constructed out of 'lines: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Crll pervious asphalt instead of regular asphalt.This All allowable species,except species with overly- System(Pavement Suspension System if abutting could be installed directly over the soil cell system, aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and property has an existing tree with roots extending into eliminating the need for a roadway sub-base[51 in Short-leaf Fig the right-of-way) that specific-area and allowing any runoff to percolate • Minimum Soil Volume Required: directly into the uncompacted solid area where the Palms: • 7,0(1(1 t f of uncompacted soil per tree; tree's roots could absorb water and possibly help to • All allowable species.without exception • 700 cfaf uncompacted Buil per palm filter any pollutants it may carry. • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume 2. 121 Portions of the curb and gutter could be may be reduced by 3070 it soil volume areas are constructed using pervious concrete to allow for shared by two trees/palms or more nmol(to he directed directly to the tree pit and the • Suitability: hest suited for medium shade trees tree's rootball. • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading 3• (RI Utilities could be installed beneath the Bike Lane • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: Yes,Minimum 4 feet wide • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Pncourtged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water rapture strip:Encouraged • irrigation:Permanent,Required . ' LEGEND r . 1 `•+ ' r I." r„ , rw 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk ',• '- a ;', 2. Concrete Curb ..rd;.rs e O �r�s 3. Curb Pad --o� (t 4. Slab Sub-base 5. Roadway Sub-base O 6. 'Free 7. Tree Critical Ruutball Area B. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Bat't'ier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering - 10.Soil Suspension System '" ^'•�ars.M. 11.Amended Sail I Ilnting Nix Asphalt® © 70: ' ll. I ivcd Area r� dr .*, k '��I1'li 4 ,gy'✓ ^�©� (1) 9 .i x p �t'C.,t...: ' , hrT- ,vY. Oy 0 1 „{":�t �• • 'i •L1 • . I� -0.A, t. �� „. �µr4 j ..:r% ' r:� `�; T f. -. -b�- i' it4., ;` i _ '01... tAi Tint yzg A1,g� . .f, ..• ,,, , J,^ .,,,i1<.=:a r .,k; . t, ...,-"..,-...:0.4.r; 'Q" .•= ' -^,,:,.. ,:= _ - ," age 1059 of 1576 ;,roar. dca..,-}1rd,:xls for m mgt'n•ec ill?':a:r,}S,•,rel,tipeula I:unditums Ia5 R I U110 + I + PRKG . . . ,, _______ ., t ,• , If ,t,:,...,, c,i,.....,..q.„1„.„.4, „k. -7 ... 'l' ,•,'...,ri 14�,�� 4 t l RESIDENTIAL.STREET FRONTAGE • r n h'�I ':� URBAN CONDITION WIDTH GREATER TWAPI 10 FEET ; WITH CURB-SIDE PARKING " ` •.,%yy�Y t rt..7;r .`ice..: 4 At : • ', ., . - _ zYS i _ir'.ill' % ASL, Ilt "'1S4• • 4*w• 4 _• • 1 +�:° ,,,...,A II' +'{' .... n V. . il a --`• �p1 1a MO .0 L .],�I, III�.I "T 1.4 uY •� + .... •�yJ� : f 0.� J fil 7�3` Y � ,�AS'�ICm�'�� ;�Mr"[�4" T. r .a u'a•• •.., ..- .Y- � tip. •47,0?-:,..."--.- .. 1}.;' . :s:: 7, -`'.',> $1.1:41.' 11,l W. • .* � Y,.,q. .`~•.. .� ..Jr.,µ 'J�..4y9aI9�• (•:'n v .y I. y kF: • ` - 4:._ 7+ • % li:..-'ix, _ .s i`kt�IF' il ."kI •i. ;4.4......2-,• ice, • i lir, cay..:?L.u:a'it•.,.I: Page 1080 of 1576 t[bat,l'„r,•;[S1.r.1,•,I'Iu:znzo DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. [2J-Portions of the curb and gutter could be Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell constructed using pervious concrete to allow fur • All allowable species,except species with overly System(Pavement Suspension System if abutting runoff to he directed directly to the tree pit and the aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and property has an existing tree with roots extending into tree s rnothall, Short-loaf Fig the right-of-way) 2. (BI-Utilities could be installed beneath the parking • Minimum Soil Volume Required: strip Palms: • 1,000 cf of uncompacled soil per tree; 3. J 10 J Soil cells can be substituted with structural • All allowable species,without exception • 700 era unamrpacted soil per palm soils provided that the correct,equal volume of soil • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume is Provided and a minimum of 50%of the concrete may be reduced by 50%if soil volume areas are sidewalk[I]is constructed out of pervious concrete shared by two trees/palms or more • Suitability: Best suited for medium shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • Irrigation:Permanent,Required • - LEGEND • - - - ,I at . 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk ' '.' !Pl+ ,'O. r 2. Concrete Curb t - - :i. Curb Pad' „lit ' 1 ymfIik` A. Slab Soh-base S. Roadway Sub-base 0 G. Tee 7. 'free Critical RootbaII Area O 8. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Rout Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering 10.Soil Suspension System ~• t''r-,,,o "MAiw•,.c•;•,,,. �ti 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix 0 © . c aro %rpt. wsec 12.Asphalt Paved Area •®rhlL-�© ^' -0 * F oC W •le'oe... , 0 y - :. .' y -•fey•'1 •:: -`: offe-:J*? - • ..Y• 'w. a .. *.'t%r.:rG�,cr , .ti, —'•,;•.1t•• :.. Fhr.. � ,y- . ..ry„1 ;M �,o . :,:wi Ir. .?e,� s',,.• , m �bx,s �' '4.1 - • .4.14.1.7at4Z.tfli• .' .-: • . ., ' •: '''.., ... :''''''•' • I^ • ..fin,,`• :., ,..;•,..,,,,. • - 'a?t,•'nl tid• `• :114 •_ .. 'z.. '• t . ., - - tr ori Campy"::1,:114 •'age 1• 0 Ilrh.ur'tlutit,•MVI III cis fni Planting Twes in hl rami Itch Specific t:onditlun, 137 K :V.id" a C"fit ar.y c •R U 1a + -PRG ,1rI I� �ry �:.:.....:.::::'.� , `. • _ • L h'1 5 as .i. •�+1••.. �I \m RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE .; µ �a �55�h�'iidl ff� i • , Hill .N URBAN CONDITION •,�, WIDTH GREATER THAN 10 FEET WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING '"� I - k'? . ' ': . • 'oil r 4 J 1;1" 1X111;-e ((( 'NM lir iill•-:'' U.1.' ., } tY 9Z'ryT J t•' .., .1] t1C t • x I M `"4 � rC y.��i""l ' ''.:1'...1..!:.).11. . *'I •..$ ..-...a t rt v 'I ?V.. V1 '10t84:9..11,;; v .1- (,r ti r!l Si}f a ,p t ;f. �irre�t`gr rt.'s�` �1 .m!,....4.-01•4N'.5.• -• ,..' •y. .. Irl,, J•u'►�r`{r ? ,rT^.'INI S , M.. { � i k } q1. y'�., _r �.v�l", J..."''.d;;!.....4.-",'� I' i ,p• '�'" "1Z ?r e,14,,FA ', a•: _ 1 :'...1.,..;..•,-.1.,,1-1;''. t^4...14,..w• -•,;.:•,•..'.4,.: -.i.:.•-•-.1..." 1 .�? • ('';,� • ,r " X4.1•• , ,,, !Iii :y . • : n'I µ .'i''..•Y`o ` '�. �, •'bra 7';Sfj1.`L"!'i '�G°'i'•+..,•�1•"`• a1 •ii ti ,.-..T.,....1.:-.14,1...,..w1-3.....i,f ll�a�f. a . i.. J A.0 0 . Page 1.062 of i576 rib.,:138 City o:NI I.. ii.-,al: •!.1,....t1,1.1,8•:•Plat:211211 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required 1. 12J-Portions of the curb and gutter could be Tees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell constructed using pervious concrete to allow for • All allowable species,except species with overly System(Pavement Suspension System if abutting runoff to be directed directly to the tree pit and the aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and property has an existing tree with roots extending into ore's roothall. Short•leal'Fig the right-of-way) 2. [131•Utilities could be installed beneath the parking • Minimum Soil Volume Required: strip Palms: • 1,000 cf of wtcompacted soil per tree; 3. [101 Soil cells can he substituted with structural • All allowable species,without exception • 700 cf of uncompacted soil per palm sons provided that the correct,equal volume of soil • Allowances far soil volume reduction: total volume is provided and a minimum 01'50%of the concrete may be reduced by 50%if soil volume areas are sidewalk[l I is constructed out of pervious concrete shared by two trees/palms or noire • Suitability: Hest suited for medium shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:lincnuraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Encouraged • Irrigation:Permanent.Required r - LEGEND ' ••' 1:• i` +y, t 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk _ ?1/4 ` - t ��_a _ • _ 2. Concrete Curh _ ter . 0 * _• 3. Curb Pfd 0 4. SlabSuh-base 75A.,,,,7:: .'I'. 5. Roadway Sub-base 0 0. Tree 7. Tree Critical kootball Area O U. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Barrier) 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering `T• .ce'5aie; 10.Soil Suspension System t'w '?�uaumi�w,y.� ,,,,„„,,,,,,,,,,,,,4,s,..„ 11.Amended Soil Phinting Mix k...3'` • z•. •='- •: • 12.Asphalt Paved Area .'t eMi ° rx Z© .�. i14$0''' O- . �••••''''•::';!:3r M r,0 ire 51 .•'.151:.:i�hl l i'' 1q rti air w;s4 .c�'�uh- -' it '�t .i4',r,1r;•'4" -'n. i 1.41,4141,944: 7 • M40r, -0 74t. ..... / ra :Y ..k' ',. °'4�' afa ^~' •• ` . �R614�. � . i • • - ..ti .. .n^ • . ii ,170. diA. •may. '*•'''—',.;'1' w • y1 1 urban ea,nfr'y^r,u,lku' Page 10tH of 13/b Urban'Foci a•Method,for i'Luuing'1'rccti hi Miami He.frh Sperihr Cundinnm 139 F SI - P1KG , .,,,'4,.,,,. ... _ ,j �, ii .., . i.,..,, ... y r " ;11.i:j7:11:r4b:::;!1'.,#1...':illi.)."171;1::?"., t SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE SUB-URBAN CONDITION ► - *- ~ '�,> � i�' ., i�- r z OVERALL SWALE WIDTH LESS THAN$FEET dil°f “,L.q. I!!i1 ly I4' , It i, SNI ; , li'q PLANTING STRIP LESS THAN 3 FEET � { t , •.,, ' ub JiIrj4111p y� 7 WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING x''_• t,'1'� �� • • �.� ..4�'l I,t' U Vail)d 3 , iii u'�S ... t • Q l ''' J dl,. Ili�t'1"k. 1'r 7taf 4).'.,:;;I:;',.1 ty q ' 1610 '. ' • I 4 .77,7‘,"` ''fr.r; -'1:"..".'....A,'o.):7:,, owOiliailr .,,,, ' .. . Y ea- d 1 \ 111041 ig° ,;. s'214 ?..,..1.-1,4-..1',. ., .,.' 1;It. If rt ;, >�I`�, t` d'"ji1qq" �jY3` ..1-:::-'15'''':: .,,,,-• � :j',a ;`_rk'•, � •� 'yir�:•�iy�, Mi�'. ji.'7-4..'1..:'"- -',:."'''''.-7:':21-1;',415..:-*.t{ . r�...' S"" '�i�"" - :..!'''f:.:1".;:,'.::: "t' '_ .:'''..'>,' s} �•�.�� i�•i i L w� ' 91 -'�yl�'u � - ,,.1"1.24,1'4 5„ m 'i"'�JJR�•f S .tr• f;,7,`,;T�:�•�'+,•,'. SMS a 1 y y} S ••i '14;7;' .4, '- N- • '..'%'"r .. 1•'! ,,,,A 7 yfi •i`►l:F 4,z ir •♦'..• • •-. : ''' Ste'; q,=', s ' y,.. ' `'3, 1? ; 1 1, err•. 14U 1i1V,,1 Mrnul Red,h Page 1054 of 1576 wI.,ii ,.:,,xnt.ylrrPhi gzuzu DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: 4. RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Required1. WHA-Utilities maybe constructed in a duct beneath the Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Structural bike lane • All allowable species,except species with overly Soil Required,Soil Cell Preferred.(Pavement 2. 121-Portions ofthe gutter could he constructed using aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and Suspension System ifabutting property has an existing pervious concrete to allow for runoff to be directed Short-leaf Pig tree with roots extending into the right-of-way) directly to the tree pit and the tree's raatball. • Minimum Soil Volume Required: 3. I Ila]Soil cells can be substituted with structural Palms: • 1,000 rfufuneompacted soil per tree; soils provided that the correct,equal volume of soil • All allowable species,without exception • 700 cf oh uncompactec(soil per palm is provided and 1110%of the concrete sidewalk 11]is • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume constructed out of pervious concrete may he reduced by 50%if soil volume areas are - shared by two trees/palms or more • Suitability: Best suited for large shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Not Required • Irrigation:Temporary Required,Permanent Encouraged 4 LEGEND r 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk _' . .:,a. . .4a • °r,, L. Concrete Curb illi t` O 3. Curti Pad `' h 0 4. Slab Sub-base 5. Roadway Sub-base I 0 6. 'Free m7. 'Tree Critical Rootball Area 0 8. UndergroundUtilities(Wrapped in Root Harrier) 0 9. Pervious Aggregate Covering x+ws•,. 10.Sod Suspension System «••. ._, 11.Amended Soil Planting Mix r . ® © O 12.Pervious Planting Strip ,�h .tla,.tm p 1 ; - • .,. 13.Asphalt Paved Area l li ii © .x •D;'::-. ° 14.Private Property :i;• ` ` t" ;= 'mt. ,•. t ' ymrL.t, ..1X‘r 0µ '- t 4 • 'i'�i. ,.:,, vS:1} w . r ,.• • y •1 Url..,,,c.umpy'.4w' •88B •1. 0 1!limn'nn lies-MvIln for Ptun mgl't'vrs In Miai til Heath Spec-ilk Caught tuns Ill r 1(6 R �L r' JIIIII�I IY c zr= •. -✓ dl y • :, 111 ii t.,•�, ;;. • I�,rdN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE . SUB-URBAN CONDITION •r,. - �gl '1,,,,,-117,0r,,, I^=�I«," OVERALL SWALE WIDTH LESS THAN 11 FEET •. iy,� ;i"+g c t PLANTING STRIP LESS THAN 6 FEET 1 ` OM WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING A ' `:i 1 •",: f t tr r'",' c ;u 'ms, � flnl lh ., �'�I! rh HiPf� r8 , e f itt. .,...s. . rklp• Igo,u 1:.,,' y a..-s. • R •• 1 ft:'r int0411..1.40 P r ',. .:1016 ••:-. • 1 �1••• — �/ ,.,.,••_;.ung ., .. jY „ A •n 1 .,t lj --'14.'"'-g:''.• I YII '�I ',4- ul-,•01? %•,i„'r•trr7,'. 'ti'1,+ •. I h` .�� mc • ~'k`.� A - %:,,,, , • • "1 .-ua 1 t 'fi , �a, � r.� _ .r., ..� jN,. '^. a `; eV' •_K.��sr ;.r rN;tp 'Iii• i�'y • r ;; � ��'{ ry +y: • f4 11 • .. .• y,„..ws l'i,p,,i,r1 • r.Y, • • •SI' l. ; .. r )4 • w M • 1. 'age 1:•O • la! :nv o1 mL..,14,16 Ilrb.w.i',,,.t Mawr,PI.C211211 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure Recommended 1. ]Ii]-Utilities may be constructed in a duct beneath the Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell bike lane • All allowable species,except species with overly System(Pavement Suspension System if abutting 2. [2)-Portions of the gutter could be constructed using aggressive root structures,such as Strangler pig and properly has an existing tree with roots extending into Pervious concrete to allow for runoff w he directed Sbort•leai Fig the right-of-way) directly to the tree pit and the tree's ruothall. • Minimum Soil Volume Required: 3. 19]Soil cells can be substituted with structural soils Palms: • 1,000 clot uncontpacted soil per tree; provided that the correct,equal volume of suit is MI allowable species,withoutexception • 700 cf of uncompacted soil per palet provided • Allowances for soil volume reduction: total volume may be reduced by SI)Ye if soil volume areas are shared by two trees/palms or more • Suitability: Hest suited for large shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged . • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Not Required • Irrigation:Teutportuy Required;Permanent Recununended LEGEND • - I. concrete ur Paved Sidewalk ' 41 r � a �' 2. Concrete Curb �'!! j 3. Curb Pad 4 e.:-.7..:1:4L $iEO 4. Slab Sub-base S. Roadway Sub-base a 6. Tree . ,> -" O•O i' 7. Tree Critical Roo tha ll Area ccu • D 8. Underground Utilities(Wrapped a pped in Root Barrier) 9- Soil Suspension System 10.Amended Soil Planting Mix .x ® 11. Pervious Plantin Strip I ite •f*, :?!.i2:::::•;•: ',: :::-.':. r' 0 0 r 12 Asphalthived Ar a 13.irivate 'roperty,rr • •'fr - :. - ' t' t0 0 ,�-� .0 �• ....... ' •.y .' '�••. rdrau r,nu,py"Iwiuut' •age 1• o • :'11oac..:u i Methods for 1'Ian:ing Trr.-4 i5'..r.a Brach tiprnf ii-tin uditicu.. 143 r i / �d dr n, RA.y 1 R S 6,..1 PRKG A40 g SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE ` r{• ,„,,,..p4,,c _ SUB-URBAN CONDITION t �` OPERA SWALE WIDTH LESS THAN 1$FEET •- Oal'41:7.:::llei'llil...i!til:ji.iI...I..:',..I.z!I.:r., 1 l �r .1 PLANTING STRIP LESS THAN 10 FEET i •y '• - '. ? �� 14hr. :54. WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING ;, ``• # • '' S 1114 1,'°1'.:11!I, • 'ti ..•- 1i ..." rj yIiyi 1 + 4 Fe' 'ate-'i • •$i i• - • , tilliN1 ,.. .. . • Ic.,... Nsol. VialliWilliFI ,} n: .-•IA.,'ai s,,- 1�4 @;y" r ar "•` 4 ;`'W7'�'.: .;a:;;,l. b 1:;°-.1.--',.-.7,- 6Fr � (51C^1 .ri,+�'i`�Vf.•}n"� ..•�;,• ..-‘•••-•,11..-�.�. +ted•'^;v.i7 '.a + . •�+tr1iir ,* ' `bk R. �Y'; ,:-:';----1---1,1 '4114.V..i' '".1/..&. '4.'' '',•. •-":"1-:'r''....'..''' .'1m° "F'4`'• •A' 7 i•r"A"1� , - r,• ''''''t .t.• i 2 ;•.:r, . rte. r°;.r _ - • .�i��.,� �:�.'!.•II. ,.r. : - r, �I_ ;yrs r. .! dY•'"ra�: i r:7. :� `"ru�� •".F' .. . .,r.1..., �'y.�n:1,1 i I ••n �,�p . i+ l +*r;.11.1.-.T... ......-17/,•.• 7 ii: ."1' S °s nY • m. we "0d 7 iR? �u ,° •}:E. . ;��.r,�T'a•••1- v��• o, 7,. ;:.1!0 ,,: moi!}'. : 1•(•; fiq•ul'Miomi 11••.i h •age 0•:U • 11ii.dr.Y,,,-L1da. -r 19.n 2020 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: • Green Infrastructure:Recommended L. [21-Portions of the gutter could be constructed using Trees: • Preferred Green Infrastructure Method: Soil Cell pervious concrete to allow for runoff to be directed • All allowable species,without exception System(Pavement Suspension System ii abutting directly to the tree pit and the tree's rnothall. property has an existing tree with rants extending into 2. [9J Soil cells can be substituted with structural soils Palms: the right-of-way) provided that the correct,equal volume of soil is All allowable species,without.exception • Minimum Soil Volume Required: provided • 1,000 cl of uncompacted soil per tree; • 700 cf of uncounpacted soil per paten • Allowances for soil volume reduction:total volume may he reduced by SO%if soil volume areas are shared by two trees/palms or more • Suitability: (lest suited for large shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: No • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Encouraged • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:Not Required • Irrigation:Temporary Required;Permanent Recommended • - . G ^-4, LEGEND s . ....,.- • r� 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk *Nil t2,.•. l.iM1;n:✓'t '. `Il ,e.� ,.T •'" .4 it 4- 2. Concrete Curb ' • r a3. Curb Pad `'; O h, Slab Sub-hale S. Roadway Sub-base 6. Tree ® 7. 'Tree Critical Rootball Area H. underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root Harrier) 0 9. Soil Suspension System 10.Amended Soil Planting Mix ,,.y 11.Pervious Planting Strip t ,4 0 • 1'l.Asphalt Paved Area '` °`y 1P'5 'lr15V©1 .`S" i.. Z' l'' -1 1lt 13.IovatcPropeity 0 . •4,, ba, s:z.•,•,...4,..,...:-.. . 4VII© k..,,,,,,'11'...i;l1k:!'iA, - iA W •ft i4}7"� ��''Yt ^.�",.. i'•n ,•. • .., T,Iu�ll^Ju�i�,.y:u PageIte 1069 O(1578 hphnn C:i, Ily'Tur.Pal' llrh..nT;stics•Methods for I'l.ultinn'I'rees in Miami Ik-.tell tier;.fr.4::aal.::ons 1•I; RI S 10 -i- -PRKG . ''":i �,ati W�., . , .... ....,..... y . .. 1, t' �" +I,.. SI I aa.. t l • �II�III ILII 1.7 JI ki rR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STREET FRONTAGE - Is 3 SUBURBAN CONDITION r ,,: ,Y r. ill,1 �IIPII 'Ir1:14 ll„, OVERALL SWALE WIDTH GREATER THAN 15 FEET • I, PLANTING STRIP GREATER THAN 10 FEET ' ' 4 `' WITHOUT CURB-SIDE PARKING y, ,', '" ILL 9.0.0tl3'II' c • I , .. 1 1. `Y"tIto, • , .41-,' .;7i tt' ••:—.�tirt r•7 :d', 1 a ti,. y- , 'i - lid11 IIIIIIdi�l' IIIII • ,I y�4, F`d �tl. .1016 ,, . g ri r '" r'''''•...t...- ,4,;,,,,:,--f-;III �' 1"4 ILII 7 �p f r�� n I• !'"•11'''' 11.1 r-'d ; ..:;';',,,..1.1.",;:;,; t :`r 4:• �.i d;` ii I� i`4Y y ,i N1l1r d4� 1, r� r'k� I Ye',Yt�''':•"!' ',I.:'''''''''''I''''' Ie,�ti 4 • ".. ::`, •••• �4y RI,S OAPV0i 41, ' Ig1 tl, a I � •'�A i a��a � M • 'II'....� . , � `}` r y��•,�. R �t,� ,y � .',, It II "' ° '0.Hirlho: -S y °:''',PI Y I1la. m � °alhi"..r i. y �.,i-...../64,0 phof," . } ,. 1 4;_I }`y'k �,n. 3 i.�M • mom" ` M"* I ;SII L,.y. % • iii.!•:'• i. `. •,,..s'. ? .M"'' r f Pj. A . * .. . �4 ; Ll ,�d5, �,.�- ': �., x z'°. n Li:'ill Jjnr 'a'Id�1�'44 F tI N�@U� �M%T ..1 1*' i h y I•R T a � '" a �I,O d I I I G l�.r t _ 1 I•�a:i ii i: `4Y�r!= " ,i� ��'�, a �ryI+7•f�� :'�A�•. �� ,,;:..!:,..,,d.....,-,*, r.., a�' r. . 1.I6 (.111101 M1.11,11 IIe. lI 'age 1070 of 1576 urbal-:,••,',1 ntaa°•:•11..it DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED SPECIES INCLUDE: Green Infrastructure:Recommended1. [1]-Concrete sidewalk may be substituted for 'Trees: •• Preferred Green Infrastructure Method:Structural pervious concrete • All allowable species,without exception Soil System ,_ • Minimum Soil Volume Required: Palms: • 1,000 cful'uncnmpacted soil per treet • All allowable species,without exception • 700 ct ui uncompacted soil per palet • Allowances for soil volume reduction: N/A Suitability: Hest suited for large shade trees • Preferred tree canopy growth habit: Spreading • Soil volume area to extend beneath abutting asphalt area: Nu • Pervious Concrete Sidewalk:Not Required • Perforated drainage pipe and pervious water capture strip:N/A • Irrigation:Temporary Required,Permanent • Recommended • • .. LEGEND 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk �Ilr'F'p4 � rei�,,e. ..\1/4:... ..,--,. f t 2. Concrete Curb elli:1L----'.'''' v"w9tydu► ` y. 3. Curb pad is lr R,^ O 4. Slab Sub base 5. Roadway Sub-base (i. 'free ell 7. Tree Critical!tootball Area �l H. Underground utilities(Wrapped in Root Harrier) O 9. Amended Soil Planting Mix 10.Pervious Planting Strip 011.Asphalt Paved Area a�• r a, ,'k r `..V `, : , • 12.Private Property • .r , Allt6 i M t ` y ""Vki .1 i ii,t ' ,3 o-5 :tii rrZ..y;.'.. :I „.. rd4 M IP0 O . •�r,��»,V�/`hyi�:i�'.1�gY�„ i`"�Mhh��r;;ia1►1fxe•�oN�}r•t',xfl.,.wotry +. �.:`.. •~ •,4. +' t'+Y''"t `. "I='.:•: ..tr . M„1rNI ' • ,. ;. Rir ± + i 'k, w ' 3 ii ' ..,+:' - A''rv. ' +•. .^..-,,,17,;:::...:.•••• '� 4 t^.'xe Maliltinicv ;f•cikit, age 1071 of i576 l.'fiPall':'a0iUN•Methods fur Pl;iuting'frec,in Miami Beach Spociln Coed MOILS 147 APPENDICES • REVIEW OF CITY DOCUMENTS AND ADOPTED MASTER PLANS Policy and Regulation: • Establish and maintain diversity in tree species and age classes. The development of Miami Beach's()than Forestry Master • The U.EM.P. - Will recommend ways to achieve Plan included a comp rehensivereview ofthe(:ity'spolicies, more spec lox diverxitn and will it'ca:nmeriii ways to tree preservation ordinance, landscape requirements, achieve more equally distributed age classes. and other standards from the Urban Forestry Division. These policies and regulations provide the foundation • Minimize tree loss. for the City's urban forestry program They establish the • 7'he UF.M.l'.-Will recommend objectives to further regulatory framework for the protection and preservation reduce lass due to developers,current and proposed of the urban forest,as well as the standards fur planting, City projects,as well us private property owners. installation,and care of the City of Miami Beach's trees. The Ibllmving provides a summary of the review process • Maintain City of Miami Beach's trees in healthy and and key findings. nun-hazardous condition through good management plait ices. Review of the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance: • The UF.M.P. -Will recommend objectives to better manage the City's public-trees,and may recommend Ovenni,the City ofMiarMBeach's existingtreepreservation strategies totransition ma intesiunce of the street ordinance is very comprehensive and Fairly strung. Some trees from the adjacent private property owners to of the main goals and objectives of the ordinance correlate the City staff und its contractors. very closely with dee recommendations of the Urban Forestry Master Plan. These objectives are included in • Minimize maintenance costs and damage to walks, the Purpose of Intent section of the ordinance. More streets,andinfrastructures byappropriate tree species specdic•ally,some of theta arc to: planting and providing for sustainable growing space • The U/-Mal'. - Will recommend a Toolbox of • Promote optimum sustainable amount of tree cover strategies to do that and to guide City staff in on public and private lands. making decisions abunt trees in alt future projects. • The Miwni Beach Urban Forestry Plan (U.F.M.P..) - Will recommend goals to enhance tree canopy • Preserve the communities'character and quality of coverage and improve maintenance. it will also life. recommend youts to make the City's tree canopy • The U.ICM.P. - Will identify the City's character more sustainable in future,as welt. (maybe by neighborhood) and recommend enhancing that aesthetic,and alt)enhancing the quality ol'life by providing in,y rook shade,walkubility, and improving stormwater runoff and quality,as welt -age N`) Review of the City's Landscape Requirements: • This is also good, because the City currently has some recommendations endations for improvements to the City's Florida Friendly trees and landscaping an overabundance n/palms, which do riot provide ordinances.That study isthe G.LC.'nMaxi mizingstnrnuvater that tvill recline irrigation needs Overall,the City of Miami Beach's landscape code is very the same benefits us shade or canopy trees. This benefits using green infrastructure in Miami Beach'Acodes • Improve water qualityofdischarges good and quite stringent. In addition, the City Staff are requirement will continue to help the City to and ordinance audit for integrating trees into xturmwater - 'lime U.EM.P Will demonstrate that currently in the process of further strengthening the encourage its residents,developers and businesses to management program and reducing imperviousness': trees will intercept rainwater and their requirements. In that way,the City Staff are consistently pkat.more shade trees Co increase canopy coverage roots will clean slormwater. keeping the current code requirements up to date. 'Phis is throughout the City. The recommendations for tree preservation ordinance in • Improve.the capacity of City's storulwater something that should be done a prescribed regular basis. that study include: system to reduce flooding The recommendations of the Urban Forestry Master Plan • The code requirements include a species diversity • The U.F.M.B-Will verify that trees will shall only serve to reinliirce the purpose and intent of the requirement chart. I. Require sturdy chain link tree protection fence in absorb and diffuse stormwuter- thus, landscape code requirements. Some of those main goals • 'l'heU.RM.iJ.will u/sn recommend you/s amid objectives high risk areas. . reducingrunu/f: and objectives include to: that will promote increased diversity of tree species. 2. Use a full spectrum of tree p rotectiun devices and • Important indicators are: methods and provide guidance to developers about • urban runoff - Ni, downward trend - a. Prevent the destruction of City's existing tree • The rude also requires at least two lot trees to be when to use each device. Existing initiatives: Green alleys, green canopy and promote its expansion. planted in an"energy conservation zone"within the lot. 3. Define"critical root zone"as an area 1.5'times the parking kits and green pocket parks. h. improve aesthetic appearance of new develupnrent • This is very good because it encourages residents diameter of the tree trunk(1).0.11.) • The U.FM.P - will identify locations ;and protect historic landscapes. to plant shade trees where they can provide the 4. Require informative tree protection signage- where there are opportunities to plant c. Promote sound landscaping principles through maximum amount of energy savings. However, summarizing the"do's and don'ts". trees the use of drought tolerant and salt tolerant plant there is not much information in that section of the 5. Enforce City's tree removal permits and ensure • Existing initiatives: Stormwater pollution species,and also promote"right tree,right place" code to explain where exactly that zone is located. compliance is upheld.Educate Special Magistrates prevention education. d. Promote use of trees and shrubs for energy 'l'lie 1/FM.F will rc'crumnrnend possibly adding slime anti stall'about importance oftree canopy toCity. • The OEM.F • May recommend conservation inure illustrations to better define where the energy 6. City could incorporate new trenchless technical educational materials on how trees e. Provide shade conservation zone is located within each type of requirements into their code. improve this. I Improve stormwatermanagement property. • The IL/iM.P - Will reinforce all these • Existing initiatives: Stormwater master g. Ameliorate noise impacts and light pollution recommendations. plan(Jacobs Engineerings Plan-pending) h. Promote use of canopy trees to sequester earlier' The City's landscape code also includes specifications and • The UEM.P. Will create a Tindbox and . dioxide emissions requirements for landscape maintenance. Some of the Comprehensive Master Plans and Studies: Strategies that will work with this plan items addressed include: (in the future). The tlliM.B - Will recommend goals and The development of Miami Beach's Urban Forestry Master objectives to help the city achieve all of these • In terms of tree pruning, it describes the manner/ Plan included a thorough review of many of the City's B. Energy Conservation: things,especially prevent destruction of'existing method for pruning. existing Master I'laus and previous studies that have been • Goals: trees, promote use of Illorida Friendly trees • This section could be enhanced even further with adopted recently.Some ofiheseMaster Plans directly relate • Reduce energy consumption and mare sustainable trees, provide more information from the International Society of to the recommendations and findings of the urban Forestry • The U.F.M.E- Will emphasize that trees shade and energy savings,improve stornrwnter Arboriculture(ISA) and other organizations. Or, Master Plan-either by calling lir the City of Miami Beach coal buildings. management and quality,and reduce the City's the City could develop some more detailed guides or to action on certain issues or to implement new policies carbon fiumprint. brochures to illustrate proper tree care to the public and standards to accomplish the goals of the master plan C. Alternative Transportation: or study. Its many cases,those action items or goals are • Benefits: Sonic of the more interesting and restrictive requirements • Stipulates that all street trees are to be maintained by aligned with the recummendauons contained in the Urban • Improved air quality and overall community that ;are specific to the City of Miami Beach's landscape the adjacent property owner. Forestry Master Plan. In other cases,the proposed policies health. Greater opportunities for residents code arc the following: • The U.KM.B - Will encourage better public and objectives outlined in a previous master plan or study to engage in social interaction and exercise. information and educational materials to show may actually he in conflict with the recommendations and • The U.F.M.P. - Will recommend trees • In ternis of the number of street trees required to lie residents how to properly maintain their trees,mid objectives of the Urban Forestry Master Plan. The Master along streets,walks,and bike paths that planted on sites,the maximum avenge spacing is 20' could also result in community activist groups/ Plans and previous Studies that were reviewed are as will improve coir quality,provide shaded on center,which is very close together:and results in volunteers to help with tree pruning and care,or hulows,along with the main points and key elements that uhernnte transition methods, and lots of trees being required,and ultimately,planted on planting projects in neighborhoods. correlate with the Urban Forestry Master Plan: encourage more social interaction and sites. • The ILEM.B may also encourage City Officials to exercise. • Over time,this will increase the amount of canopy seriously think about taking back the maintenance Review of the City of Miami Beach's Sustainability Plan coverage in the City: of all street trees-to ensure long term survivability. -Energy Economic Zone Work Plan: U. Natural Resource and Ecosystem Management as well. • Major Benefits/Goals: • Under the tree planting requirements, palms are A. Water Conservation and Quality: • Enhance, restore and protect natural allowed to be planted,but do not count towards the in addition to reviewing the City's existing tree • Major Goals: resources which increases biodiversity and number of required trees. They can be planted,hut are preservation ordinance and landscape code requirements, • Decrease water consumption resiliency of City's ecosystem. only in addition to the required trees. one of the other Studies that was reviewed included • '!'he U.JiM.P - Will encourage planting • Increase canopy coverage and reduce so cart.•,.'NImi mini ti,•.,J. Page 1U/4 of 19/6i union t ryst Master PL.u:2020 stormwater runoff; improve air quality, Existing initiatives: Integrated Pest groundwater mid increased sea Water inundations. sustainability awl ecological purposes versus beautify neighborhoods and provide shade Management (FPM) systems; (Xeriscape) • The U.KM.!! - Will recommend objectives those trees that may be occasionally planted for for pedestrians. Florida Friendly Landscaping incorporating trees into these stormwater systems aesthetic'reasons primarily. • Decrease heat island effect,which reduce • The UP:M.!! - Will promote I.PM. that tv!!l not destruct, but rather enhance, the From Recommendations: energy costs. systems and Florida Friendly trees and effectiveness of those systems in both reduc.'iny the • Enhance strategies to clean and treat runoff • 17w U.RM.Y.--Will become the"blue print"on landscaping quantity of stormwater runoff but the quality of it water before it is pumped into the bay.Maximize how to do all of these things. being discharged into the bay. biological stormwater infiltration systems (i.e. • Important indicators are: G. Economic Development and Planning: bioswa les)as the first layer of treatment betbre • Biodiversity - No downward trend— • Major Goals: Conclusions: polluted stormwater is treated mechanically within Existing initiatives: Bird sanctuary • Maintain neighborhood character and • Objective no. 4 - Augment existing infrastructure the stormwater system. designation satisfaction with quality of life fur storage and treatment with solutions to improve • The U.FM.B- Will recommend objectives that • '11w 11.KM.p. - Will result in providing • Maximize Miami Beach as a destination water quality,increase recharge,and provide water for promote the creation of bioswales, including mare wildlife habitat and food source, brand potential irrigation. planting trees, to increase infiltration of • Urban Reforestation -. Upwind trend - • The ll,liM.B- Will recognize that trees • Objective No.6 Identify stormwater harvesting,reuse stormwater. Existing initiatives: Urban reforestation in neighborhoods are known to enhance and recharge well opportunities for conservation of • Encourage programs that promote environmental program; Community Gardens; Tree City its character and improve the quality of trash water. Develop storage solutions that promote education, restoration, and stewardship. U.S.A: (Xeriscaping)/Florida Friendly life/6rits residents,and will recommend irrigation and re-use of treated stormwater. Furthermore, perlin'mative vegetation can be landscaping; Landscape Code; 'free the protection and cure of signature/ • The 11F.M.)!-'Nil!highlight the opportunity for tree a didactic tool to teach lessons about natural Preservation Ordinance heritage trees and palms in the City,as lined streets and parks/open spaces to be irrigated sustainability and resiliency. • Major Goals: well as the planting of more trees that with stored(re-use)rainwater. • The UEM.p. - Will encourage educational • Increase the percentage of R.O.W.s that are will only serve to enhance Ore branding programs on the benefits of planting appropriate lolly planted with trees. of the city us an iconic place to visit, Review of Blue Ways Master Plan tree species and their role in improving • Reduce the attrition rate, or net loss, of work and livesastainabilityand enhancing resiliency. trees in the City(i.e.plant more trees than • Talks about landscaping improvements and mangrove Transition Irons planting non-native trees to native. are being removed). H. Air Quality and Climate Change: preservation and restoration: salt•talerant trees, particularly in urban areas • 'l'he U.EM.P. -Will establish an urban • Benefits and Goals: • Encourages pedestrian connectivity covered primarily by asphalt and hardscape. As forestry management plan to batter • lieducC the city's carbon footprint and • Proposes boardwalks and promenades along the the City elevates both roads and buildings, the reforest City and plan, protect and improve local air quality. waterways City should develop strategies to incorporate salt- manage the City's trees. • Decrease risk of severity of climate change • Encourages creation allying shorelines(instead of tolerant vegetation to ensure their future growth • The 11.F.M.i! - Will continue Tree City impacts,such as flooding,sea-level rise,anti just seawalls) and resilience. USAprograms and will strengthen City's storms/extrerneweatheraudtemperatures. • 'I/ic 0.1/ME-41!of which would be enhanced by • The t.F.M.!!- Will include objectives to strongly Landscape Code and'free Preservation • The 11.EM.11-Will recommend goals that tree planting. recommend the use of more salt-tolerant trees, Ordinance. will reduce the City's carbon footprint especially in areas that will be affected by rising and improve the air quality, and will Review of Harvard Study-South Florida and Sea Level sea levels and water tables. E. Community Outreach and Participation: recommend goals that will seek to better -The Case for Miami Beach • Develop a catalog of cross-section types that • Major Goals: prepare the city Jin' climate change mediate between the changing elevations o1 roads, • Increase awareness and stewardship of impacts, especially /irr flooding and From Summary Statements: sidewalks,and buildings. sustainable concepts through community groundwater rise, mid extreme high Object iveno.5-The City ofMiami Beach should incorporate • The U.IiM.1'- Will initiate the creation of such outreach and educational programming. temperatures. landscape ecology into the evaluation and design of all a catalog of cross-section types that will guide • Increase participation of cmnmunity • infrastructure projects.The City should commission astudy the planting,design.und construction of future ntemhers in civil.affairs. Review of City Wide Comprehensive Stormwater of the resilience metrics for local species and ecologies infrastructure,stormwater;and flood mitigation • The U.F.M.R - Will recommend Management Master Plan to inturtn ongoing and liture fund mitigation projects. projects. educational materials and programs; Finally,the City should differentiate between plants used such as brochures on proper tree care Executive Summary;Guide to improving City's stormwater for ecological versus aesthetic purposes and deploy them Review of Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and liii portance of trees;more tine give'- management system, flood control and water quality accordingly. • Major Goals: aavays;and may even result in possible performance over next 20 years, with considerations • The U.EM.E-Is that study that will provide Ore • Encourage people to travel by walking, volunteer tree programs,as well. for sea level rise,and a 50 year planning horizon for sea metrics for resiliencyofdi/ferent tree species und bicycling,and transit wall heights.Scat level rise will worsen Bonding potential will result in a toolbox that can be usedto inform • Reduce energy consumption and improve air F. Green Procurement: by raising tidal level and water table and staking it more future stormwater improvements and flood quality • Important indicators are: difficult to discharge sturmwater nit of the area. mitigation projects • Acknowledges that streets are civic spaces with • Landscaping • The 111/M.E. - Will outline strategies jar the • The II.KM.P - Will recommend objectives that a social function that connects people through • Number of bids that specify green products sustainability of both existing, future and newly will help differentiate between trees that that are everyday interaction or recycled alternatives--Upward trend— planted trees in rights-o/-way to deal with rising the most appropriate Pr infrastructure needs; • Involve the community in shared responsibility nun Canary"kg -age I O I I Ai pamaiaraw 15r fur street design and recunanendatians of the Urban Forestry management plart contingency budget for the Urban Forest to • Create inviting places (that reflect culture of Master flan than this one. • This plan calls for City to use the Urban Forestry. allow for critical urban forestry maintenance Miami Beach) funding calculator to determine an achievable items to continue through economic downturns • Create inviting neighborhoods Review of Updated Transportation Master Plan-Final urban tree canopy coverage goal. (establish a minimum budget requirement). • Reduce street water runoff and pollution,and Report • The U.EM.P.-Will set that canopy coverage goof, • The U.F.M.Pwill pr'ovidefactsand information maximize infiltration and re-use of stormwater end outline the objectives,means,and methods to Help city still make the justification fuer • The U.F.M.!?-Will help to achieve all of these • Goal N 1 .. Prioritize the people,the pedestrians- of how to yet there. adequate or increased funding for ILE goals by making recommendations that will Encourage city residents and visitors through safe • The study determined that the current canopy programs. result in providing shaded facilities that will and engaging infrastructure,to resort to walking coverage in the City is 17%, and that the total 7. Require and enforce 600,1.100,8 1,500 Co.Ft. promote these objectives. for their short trips within their respective living possible tree canopy coverage is 26.2% soil volume planting requirements for small, and staying areas. • The OEM.ll will determine what percentage may medium,and large trues,respectively. Review of Street Design Plan and Guidelines • The U.F:M.P- Will recommend planting more be achievable • The U.F.M.R will provide recommendations street trees along sidewalks to provide shade. • The plan presented ii.PA data on how much and details on how to do this. • Presentation of"Street Types"includes street trees, • Transportation Policies: it3 Roadway Planning, storniwruler trees take tip on average,as well as how B. Identify key streets where green infrastructure whether planted in swales,medians,tree pits,or Design and Construction.The City shall continue trees benefit the quality of life of City residents. and hike lanes are needed. Use the street "connected"tree pits. to provide fur a safe, convenient, efficient, and • The study also identified potential planting sites tree coverage map[by GJ.C.)to target streets • Also, includes a table in which every street type effective transportation system, which sustains throughout the City with low tree canopy coverage and work with being proposed requires street trees. the City's natural,aesthetics,social,and economic • The plan presented these top recommendations to transportation staff to continue to expand the • Streetscape section states that"shade in the form of resources. improve forest care in Miami Beach: shaded bike network in Miami Beach. street trees or shade structures and/or trellises'is • The U.EM.R-Will recommend ways to preserve. 1. Use G.I.C.S' stormwater uptake calculator • The U.EM.1!will look to these maps to make an element par success, protect and sustain the natural reSorrrtea'and to determine the benefits of maintaining or recommendations on neighborhoods and • Strectscape-landscape Humerus include shade aesthetics along the City's transportation increasing tree canopy goals by neighborhoods, streets to prioritise for new tree planting trees,vertical landscaping,hiaswiiles,planters,and corridors. 2. the G.I.C.S'Urban Forestry funding calculator and set goals fur these areas. It will also Landscape plazas. • N 7- Enhance, Protect and Preserve the City's to assist in setting tree planting goals. assist City Transportation Department staff • Also, includes a Planting Standards section with Neighburhoaids 3. Develop a stormwater best management to better understand how to integrate trees scone details and specifications. • The City shall provide a salt' and attractive practices design manual fur City Include trees into their designs and projects. • The U.EM.P-Will help to further define how to transportation system throughout the city and constructed green infrastructure.Without 9. Develop more information fur citizens detailing integrate trees into various streetscupe designs Mal meets the needs of users of the Right-of standards, innovative stormwater techniques how they can engage in supporting the city's through a series of methodology types and Ways. the neighborhoods. the neighboring such as green roofs. suspended pavement urban canopy. For example, the city could schematic plans for 3 sample street types found communities,and the environment. systems,vegetated swales,and true pits cannot create A 'lice Stewards Group and provide in the City of Miami Hench. • The U.EM.P. - Will aim to enhance he credited toward stormwater requirements. then[with resources and guidance concerning neighborhoods aesthetics and preserve and • The U.EM.P.will continue to build on these LI.F. management. -A Tree Stewards group Review ofU.L.1.Study-Sea Level Rise protect the environment throughout the tools um!techniques,and the Lily is currently can partner with II.0-A:s, Parks Dept.,etc. to entire city. undertaking the Stor'nrwuter Management accomplish tree planting projects that City Staff • Panel Recommendations-Continue actively using • Pedestrian Mode-"Mode Shane Vision' Master Plan may not be able to budget or undertake. green and open space.'!'hese offer an important • Provide sufficient shading and lighting on the 4. Develop an Urban Forest management plan for • The 11.l'M.1?will make recommendations to opportunity to manage and infiltrate water,given frontage mane,furnishing zone,and/or median the City. the City on how to enhance public education their permeability and sponge functions-meaning of a street. Providing enough shade may be • The U.FM.P.will describe the condition of the programs and Citizen Initiatives. the ability to absorb water naturally. achieved through the use of landscaping, Urban Purest, current maintenance costs, • The U.EM.P.-Will highlight the benefits of trees required canopies on adjacent developments, Urban 'free Canopy coverage goals and Review of G.I.C.'s Maximizing stormwater benefits and their ability to intercept rainfall, as well overhangs, awnings. arcades and/or other process 10 achieve them. using green infrastructure in Miami Beach"A codes and as act(IS a"sponge"in absorbing and filtering nonpermanent architectural sun-controlling 5. Continue the integration of planning for trees ordinance audit for integrating trees into stormwater runoff through their root systems. devices above sidewalks. in all planning and development activities. management program and reducing imperviousness". • Environmental Resources and Green Infrastructure • The 11.F.M.P - Will outline ways to (Holding pre•development conferences,allow -Enhancingandusingnaturalresourcesisacritical incorporate trees into these areas to provide fin'exploration of ideas for tree conservation This study made sonic recommendations li,rthe City's Tree canglonen t of Miami Beach's resiliency strategy and shade through natural methods. helin'e extensive funds are spent on planning, Preservation Ordinance: broader work in planning policy. Potential exists design and construction of projects/ for natural resources to play a more prominent role Review of G.I.C:s-Integrating Trees into The City's developments). 1, Require sturdy chain link tree protection fence in in the city's stormwater management strategy and Storntwater Management Strategy • The f/f M.P will crake recommendations on high risk areas. urban design aesthetic. how to better communicate and coordinate 2. Use a full spectrum of tree protection devices and • The 11.RM.P-Will do exactly this. Perhaps there • This study called fur the City to complete an urban between city departments in planning and methods and provide guidance to developers about rs' no better statement that underscores that forest management plan. doing projects. when to use each device. critical importance or implementing the goals • The U.EM.P. -Will be that urban forestry 6. Prioritize forestry activities. Develop a 3. Reline critical root zone as an area 3.5'times the 152 Curs ad Mi.u i iirach Page 10/6 of 15/6 rlrb,u:'.'u;,'r Master Nan lCRn trees diameter(ft.B.H.). • 'Tree canopy and water bodies are associated consideration and provide opportunities Jim new 4. Require informative tree protection signage- with lower surface temperature. So, phoning ones. summarizing and don'ts. trees in targeted areas can reduce heat islands. • The Master Plan presents typical sections-that 5. Enforce City's tree removal permit and ensure • Specific Data pertaining to the City of Miami show street trees in them. compliance is upheld.Educate Special Magistrates Beach: • The UI:'M.P.- will includes methodologies and and staff about importance of tree canopy to City. • Existing Tree Canopy% =5%-15% (With details on how to create appropriate planting (i. City could incorporate new u'enchless technical exception of Indian Creek) sporesJirr those street trees. requirements into their code. • Possible U.'CC (Pervious Surfaces) %_ • The U.EM.P. will reinforce all these 13%,-24% Review of Miami Beach - Beach Front Management recommendations. • Possible 1J.TC. (Impervious Surlitce) Plan • This study also recommended that the City conduct %-26%-30iyc a land cover assessment every four years to ' • Not suitable'%r=36%i-45% Natural Resource Management and Restoration: measure and compare tree canopy coverage and • Summary for Miami Beach - Existing • This plan talks about removirignon-native/invasive change over time. L:TC 11.6%/Possible U.T.C.-Pervious species,and re-planting with native species and • The U.EM.I'.will make asimilar reconimendation. = 21.6%/ Possible Impervious = 26.13%i, dune vegetation,as well as preserving habitats for • The study stated that the City should require Unsuitable=37.9% wildlife and marine life. - minunum soil volumes for new tree plantings,and • The U.EM.P - Will utilize all of this • The U.EM.P.-Will list tree species appropriate where not achievable, should require suspended good existing data and making its fur heuchside planting. pavement(Silva Cells)or structural soils to provide recommendations. adequate soil volume and support for urban trees. • Note:This study also stated that the percentage of Review of Washington Avenue-Vision and Master Plan: • The study also stated that the City should develop older trees within the City is relatively low,nod that This plan doesn't really talk about trees specifically,but a Tree Care Ordinance for City-owned trees which the City must lake better cure of its maturing trees.., rather mentions implementing streetscape enhancement requires maintenance activities by year in order to reverse this trend. projects,public Greenspace improvements,and"parklets". • The plan recommended reducing parking lot • Summary and Conclusions: imperviousness through a variety of methods and • Miami Dade County and Million Trees Miami Review of Lincoln Road-Master Plan: techniques. has set a goal of 30%U.T.C.by the year 2020. This plan is very site specific. However, it definitely • The U.b:M.h - Will recommend incorporating That includes Miami Dade County planting incorporated strategies for the creation of landscape areas some,or all,of these items into the City's risks 30%,or 3(10,0011,of die trees for that total,and and the planting cif large trees and palms within the entire and ordinances.. the rest of the cities in the County to plant 70%, corridor. This has led to the use of suspended pavement or 70(1,000,orlhe trees Iiir that total. systems in circler to provide larger soil volumes for the More Specific Plans and Focused Studies: • The-hEMP will support the reaching of that enhanced growth and susltiinimlcilily of the shade trees iii These plans were more project specific or may have had a goal by encouraging the planting of ores in this pedestrian intense streetscape. narrower focus that limited how much they correlated with both the pervious and impervious surface • The U.RM.P--Will encourage the tow of various types the llrhanForestry Master Plan.Nonetheless,theyhad some areas within the city mi/Miami I/each, of suspended pavement miii structural soil sy.stencs points that were directly related to the recommendations in all of types of projects where the planting areas atilt:C.F.M.P.which are as follows: Review of Atlantic Greenway Network-Master Plan: Jur street trees is restricted and nut adequate fbr the , long-term growth and sustainability of la;qe shade Review of"Million Trees Miami"Initiative and Miami This Plan pertains mostly to C.I.P.and G.O.Bond Projects: trees. lit addition,the U.EM.Ii will include schematic Dade County Urban Tree Canopy Assessment plans and details which will illustrate how to install • Fur this study, most citizen input was regarding and implement these suspended pavement systems. • Goals: streetscaping projects horded by the City's G.O. • Establish baseline data on the existing urban Bond.Projects include...additional trees to provide forest and provide a resource to guide future shade for pedestrians,neighborhood entry features, community forest manage ntentand restoration and new bicycle and pedestrian feat ores on local efforts. streets. • Results: • The U.EM.P will encourage these types of • Tree canopy in Miami-Dade County is 19.9% enhancements. • A large portion of area offers potential for • The plan talks about adding bike lanes and additional tree canopy.('These areas consist of connecting bicycle routes, but does not mention previous and impervious surfaces). trees, either dealing with existing trees or • Residential housing represents 42%of existing incorporating new trees to enhance to corridors. tree canopy and 33%of possible tree canopy on • The U.EM.P will recommend that new bicycle pervious suriirces. enhancement projects take existing trees into lhiant:anmic%-"liolkir 'age I a • Apprmiicee.., 153 . •.'ui.: .. _ .. -. . , • • Ik • O' i-Yi ,, 4Jfr`•il' II� N t k:' .,,'0 77.- . - I•rr . . rva ; , ' . estit,L -.:,-..,., ,,...,,...-)1: 4-4,,,: .,...-1,e,m--.t.:tt,kr \•1•ii-..5•:r...:*„.:•,:,..:...., ... . ..:.: : .., • • . . • ,:d.„, ,, • 4-.1,"„, —op NN.3.. V.41,0,,, ;o• ,,,...,..,.. 0,.. - . . . . • • a . } • ' i ti , a SkIr T.:11111011",',..1.ti;.:. ' + , pVqp•i-qv �., Il 00 ll itI1I011114,1Vh.I I., y y itr4�14 1101111 l;IFIr iiJpi '111004t4jlt - 1 471 "iyrt611!,y r 1S61 i 'a 4 i �t.. . 1 . yf*! Y i ^ tr 5� 'tef� `1S-sTi '1 d Y ,f • • 4?..„;),"r!it 'y ` %J., t \tift ) 4 ,i14�+, iLr } 1 *t as tq `r itit " • , e t : p , 4....,,...,,...„„!•„,...:. INa Iql t ' . k, .1t, tl1' Agi5 ..� [ .. :, r ry ��' S�;IIII'' p A " ,'•�v y A. r� ' • /I b • • • r7 . . . .. . t . I • .. .'•(•\tf sYSrrte. J✓1 - • .. - _� ry.— . _ _ •f, ,.....,_.. . „ �y,,yt. ., 'Ni � ' M - . . ' ..., "-'- � 1 •f .Ji;fAJ'1yy;., --f:-� , A —, � .a. • .1 ••'' "'`,..:1''i. I. • s k'" '7,ngt;.:•L'' r<:n�,..•.;&t1,�-•4:t;M+"•' 4'C`'f.rir111" '' `'.i. -"' "� .r - 111:30. '�f fir. - I. r_r „ IY - . .. • .,�r'T""rr_ ,A., h NI j 11 ,. ��.r (� air""IIII q1,41''... I �'1D�,T�j� `-`>'!y tY,p G -g• fr•' .. .. • .y - .. � N��N" �� 14 Irt .N''�4�"pl�q�l ! �.kW�"I'Ir°!�t6.�'i!1'A FIS �. '.ti��'�6 o:i-w4 "'. l a I• l l° M 1• II.'F�'�I�li•'p�,N. Abx,• �t %k"��. 3 • .. v. 4I •. -xt«. 6,.. ki. c1161 �i J •iI r ,, rS;w.. •y5��dlh^:' eh, tiliM., i ` _ _.'. yin -i .. .' .� ! ..-. T• _ _ it l'Cy�l Vi , • • ' • + � ' �- ce i•\� � . r...... `i�� r�� _i _ = • REFERENCES 1. Bastin J.-E,Finegold Y.,Garcia C.,Moll icone D., IL Energy Information Administration,2003,Emissions Rezende M.,Routh D.,7.ohner(:.M.,Crowther of Greenhouse Gases in the United Stales 2003. 'l:W.(2019) Science, 364 (6448),pp.76-79. http://www.eia.doc.guv/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/ 2. Dwyer J.,McPherson,E.G.,Schroeder,IL W, 12.Gomez-8aggethun,E.and Barton,U.N.201:1. and Rowntree,R.(1992).Assessing the Benefits Classifying and valuing ecosystem services fur urban and Costs of the Urban Forest.1992.Journal of planning.Ecological Economics,116,pp.23S-24 5. Arboriculture 18(5),1.12. 13.United States Environmental Protection Agency. 3. Cbncr;J A.,K.L.Wolf,D.R.Hackman,R.I.'I'rethcway, https://www.epa.gov/heat-islands.Accessed C.J.Blain,J.P.M.O'Neil-Dunne,L.U.Frank. (2016) 08/19/2019 Multiple health benefits ofurban tree canopy: The 14.Center for Disease Control and Prevention.2006. mounting evidence for a green prescription. Health Extreme heat:A Prevention Guide to Promote Your and Place,42,54-62. Personal Health and Safety. 4. CCFR.Center fbr Urban Forest Research,11511,1 15.American Lung Association. State of the Air 2019. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station https://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/ 5. Miller,R.W.1988.Urban Forestry:Planning:1nd sota/city-rankings/states/florida/miami-dade.html. Managing Urban Greenspaces.New Jersey:Prentice Accessed 08/15/2019. Hall. 16.Science Now.Tree Leaves Fight Pollution.October 6. Green Infrastructure Center.2018.Trees to Ullzet 2010.sciencemag.org.Web 11/05/2010.chitp:// Stonnwater(:ase Study OS: City of Miami Beach, news.sciencemag org/sciencenow/2010/10/tree- Flori da. leaves-fight-pol I uti on.h t m I> 7. Source: Miami Beach Historical Association,http:// 17.Kaplan R,Kaplan S.1989.'file Experience of Nature: www,mianlibeachhistory.org/mbhistory.litud, A Psychological Perspective.Cambridge:Cambridge accessed 08/04/2019 University Press. it. Xiao,Q.,McPherson,E.G.,Simpson,LIZ.,llstin,S.I.. 18.Ulrich RS.1986.Human Responses to Vegetation 1998.Rainfall Interception by Sacramento's Urban and Landscapes.Landscape and Urban Planning 13: Forest.Journal of Arboriculture. 21(4):235-244. 29-44. 9. McPherson,EG.,Mao,Xl,Macn,S.E.,Vanier%anden, 19.Ulrich,R.S.1984.View Through A Window May A.,Simpson,LR.,Bell,N.,Riper,P.).200.2. Western Influence Recovery From Surgery.Science 224:420- Washington and Oregon Community Tree Guide: 421: Benefits,Costs and Strategic Planting.Center for 20.Ulmer,J.A.,K.I..Wolf,D.R.Backman,8.1.'I'retheway, lirhan Forest Research Pacific Southwest Research C.J.Blain,J.P.M.O'Neil-Dunne,L.D.Frank. (2016) Station.Fs.fed.us/psw. Multiple health benefits of urban tree canopy: The 10.Johnson,Zachary S.,Koski,T.,and O'Conner.A.2017. mounting evidence for a green prescription. Health The Hidden Value of Landscapes.http://wehduc. and Place,42,54-62. agsci.colustate.edu/hortla/Colorado Water,2017. pdf age I 0 • rri,aa Canopy•:-nasie Appcodnr' ISS 21.Wolf,K.L. 2007.The Environmental Psychology of 37.Elliott,M.L.2010.Fusarium wilt()Novell and Mexican ADDITIONAL REFERENCES 'frees.International Council of Shopping Centers fan palm.University of Florida Institute of Food and Research Review.14,3:39-43. Agricultural Sciences Extension.Fort Lauderdale Calvin,Giordano and Associates.2016.Oakland Park- 22.Miller,R.W.1988.Urban Forestry:Manning and • Research and Education Center Davie,Fl..haps:// Streetscape and landscape Standards. Managing Urban Greenspaces.New Jersey:Prentice edis.ifas.ulLedu/pp278 Hall. 38.Atkinson,'1'.H.,J.I..Fultz.,R.E.Wilkinson,and R.F.Mizell. Calvin,Giordano and Associates.201E1.Deerfield Beach- 23.(:lark,J.R.,et al.1997."A Model of lh•han Forest 2000.Florida Insect Management Guide for insect Landscape Manual. Sustainability."Journal of Arboriculture 23(1):17-30 borers of trees and shrubs.University of Florida. 24.Kenney,W.A.,et al.2011."Criteria and Indicators lar Entomology Circular 310.hltp://entnemdeptu0.edu/ Crawford P.,2005.Florida Gardening Series,Vol.3, Sustainable Urban Forest Planning and Management" creatures/trees/asian ambrosia beetle.htm Stormscaping:landscaping to Minimize Wind Damage in Arboriculture&Urban Forestry 37(3):I UH--117 39.Cole,KW.(2008).Granulate ambrosia beetle. Florida. 25.Source: U.S.Climate Data,haps,//www.usclitmitedata. Indiana Department of Natural Resources. cont/climate/miami-beach/florida/united-states/ http://www.in.gov/dnr/entomulo/files/ep- Dehgan B.,1998.Landscape Plants fur Subtropical ust10543,accessed 08/15/2019 GranulateAmhrusiaBeetleFaclsheet.pelf Climates. 26.Source: Southeast Florida Climate Change Regional 40.Collins,J.1996.European Gypsy Math.University of Compact,https://southeastlloridaclimatecompact. Kentucky Entomology Fact Sheet-425.Lexington.KY. Gilman E.,1997.Trees for Urban and Suburban ung/news/new-projections-show-that-south- https://entomolugy.ca.uky.edu/ef425 Landscapes. flurida-is-in-for-even-more-sea-level-rise/.accessed 41.Richards,S.,Stutz,B.&K.Yoskuwitr..(2004). 04/07/2020 Interagency Study of'free Management Practices Haehle R..1999.Native Florida Plants. 27.(:lark,James,N.Matheny,G.Cross,V.Wake,1997, (OLO Report 2004-9.Muolgoinety County,Maryland. A Model of Urban Forest Sustainability,lournal of Office of Legislative Oversight.Retrieved frwn https:// Meerow A.,2002.Betrack's Guide to Landscape Palms. Arboriculture 23(1):January 1997 montgomerycountynul.gov/O1.O/Resources/Piles/ 28.DRG conducted an i-Tree Canopy and i=free Ilydru trees.pdf Meerow A.,Itroschat TK.,1991. Betrock's Reference Guide analysis to determine the ecosystem benefits and 42.Clark,J.R.,et al.1997."A Model of Urban Forest to Florida Landscape Plants. services Miami Beach's urban tree canopy provides. Sustainability."Journal mf Arboriculture 23(1):17-30 29.Miami-Dade Urban Tree Canopy Assessment. 2016. 43.Kenney,W.A.,et al.2011."Criteria and ludicalors for Miami-Dade County.2005.The Landscape Manual. haps://www.americanfurests.org/wp-content/ Sustainable Urban Forest Planning and Management." Department of Planning and Zoning.hops://www. uploads/2016/06/Miami-Dade_t1'I'Gassessment_ Arboriculture&Urban Forestry 37(3):108-117 miamidade.guv/zoning/library/studies/landscape- Final-LR.pdf ma nual-adopted-200 5.pol 30.United States Environmental Protection Agency. • https://www.epa.gov/heat-islands. Accessed Rogers K.G.,2(114.Landscape Plants for South Florida. 08/19/2019 31.Center for Disease Control and Prevention.2006. Rogers K.G.,2(113.Native Plants,Weeds,and Sustainable Extreme I A Prevention Guide to Promote Your Landscapes in South Florida. Personal Health and Safety. 32.National Aeronautics and Space Adminustratiuu.2015. Stresau E.1986.Florida,My Eden. https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2293/naso•releases- detailed-global-climate-change-projections/ University of Florida.2010.The Florida Friendly 33.Miami Beach Rising Above. http://www. Landscaping Guide to Plant Selection&landscape Design. mbrisingabove.cont/clintato-science/miami•heach- https://111.ifas.ufLetlu/hunnvwners/publications.htm. temperatures/ 34.USDA Forest Service Climate Change Tree Atlas. Wijaya M.,1999.Tropical Garden Design. Species Winners anti Losers by EcoRegion- Everglades. https://www.ur:s.ls.led.us/atlas/tree/ ecoregion_ew.html.Accessed June 14,2019. 35.Downer A.J.,Uchida,J.Y.,t lodel,I).R.,&Elliott,M.L (20(19),I.ethal palm diseases common in the United States,Hort'l'echnology,19(4),710-716. 36.University of Florida IFAS Extension. lethal Bronzing Disease-htlps://edis.ifts.uil.edu/pp 163 I Sa. ::nv,c.Mu,si Beach -age e:•0 Urban,Forest Mas:e:1'Lrn 51:211 5VC11.111I 1 u rbon F.NrrNt age I: 0 . 157 0,4 •I, . 1 Iiiirr'imer f I .. •. 1 I. `1 I. 'I *4j# '.. -1 X _ v• 7 111161: .. ' 4. ''� ' RECOMMENDED STANDARD DETAILS _ ..._ ` INDEXED URBAN TREE ZONE BUILD OUT SCENARIOS: �.. 1. • The various scenarios provided are indexed and named so they are easily identified with the various typological conditions they were created for, r,_ based on a 4-part naming convention. The fallowing describes the various ''' ` '. abbreviations used - -- ADAP DESCR • r v GENRL Use application desciption {3jj .il -"�.; 0 i,i�. _ .a • General Application • -.. - • �� ADAP.. . _ ' r..�:- ► Adaptability Application .4 tco-• "-C....---f.:- T5 - -- ---moi}. .T•'.i:•-.. .__-2...---*-'+ ' ..' .. ' - .: .. i 't -.*'- �jY-`-•`^.'R.--��- :-.7.,'_ - • - • _ .• _ .�.,....4cS0"i --4.-7-.•-•-•;:..:- 4,-..--4;--=;t•�� :Z.,- -1- ....-.7:-.i.: •-••:."-"t•...-— ' _L:• -- tired it Can.,'ty n Set Page 1083 of 1576 A1 -n xs 159 • UNIQUE OBSERVATIONS LEGEND G E N R L BULB 4 U T . fixtents of the bulbouts should be sired so that they equal 1. Concrete or Paved Sidewalk the dimensions ail single parking space to provide the 2. Concrete Curb amplest uncompacted rout growth area. 3. Curb Pad APPLICABLE TO ALL STREET FRONTAGES • Trees should be planted so when they are mature,they are 4. Pervious Asphalt Parking will have minimum clearance of 2-feet measured from S. Roadway Sub-base the face of curb to evade potential conflicts with the front• 6, Tree overhang of vehicles. 7. Bulbout B. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Barrier) 9. Soil Suspension System :•i 10.Amended Soil Planting Mix II 'I'hc use ul'a root barrier between the hulbnut and the 11.Asphalt Paved Area asphalt area is recommended,especially if the hulbout '' dimensions are minimal or if the specie of the tree is one ��,,, 9 V1 3 a 'i6; • !Io- rtlF, Log, ,'4,00 l l that has aggressive root growth. '� �rlM2`� Jq;. rZ "lac it "j� '°'" RECOMMENDED SPECIES 9-.. c Sys '1'rces: 1, ,, • All allowable species,except species with overly aggressive root structures,such as Strangler Fig and Short-leaf Fig !: Palms: N All allowable species,without exception R ' 1t 0 dii .. ._. , Iairrliiiiiiii°' -0 f7::-l1179..4 m © CD o ,t. ., , , , 1•Z-'7 ., 0 11 . ,1 t;.., �� 4,,t.:-.,,,;;I:;, t t`xi'l- �°-'°,F.' ° 1'' I• til',;,+ t _ Lir "�i Y . 'f h`I =1 .r. I .4:.• .14•111111% . . al. .: I 'A.rx 'elMillicell! . 1.1 `S+' a t ...!..v.16 1)h • c":,.. 1'' -:.-.•;',;::',.g....!... t'.;;:. ::•-•;';'......" 111 1 i r :'tK. '....,.7:-.>. •,....v:.: .. ,;..•. .-, 11311 coy"r M,.uw s+aer: Page 1084 of lbTb urh.,r.fi,ra Master 19.11)2(120 UNIQUE OBSERVATIONS RECOMMENDED SPECIES G E N R L S C G OT E R Trees: Medium sired species,such as: Extents of the elected pavement suspension system or • (iridal Veil soil cell system should be sired so that they equal the Crape Myrtle dimensions of two parking spaces to provide the amplest • Japanese fern Tree APPLICABLE TO ALL STREET FRONTAGES uncompacted root growth area parallel to the curb.The Palms: root growth arca should also extend a minimum of 2 feet • All allowable species,without exception into the travel lane. • Trees should he planted so when they are mature,they are LEGEND will have a minimum clearance of S-feet measured from the edge of the travel lane to evade potential conllic'ts with potential vehicles. 1. Concrete or laved Sidewalk 2. Sidewalk Sub-base t1aeyI3. Concrete Curb SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 4. Curb Pad � '41‘11,114.1811-0-"'td � S.. i „ A GI ai d' 5. uviuus Asphalt alt Parkin, t f• '1,441400„,:e` w �., IfI il.a With an ample emit growth area underlaying the asphalt 5• Roadway Sub-base ,„,...„:11:;11'5...-'1,1N311-• kr s•t;y i,; IA, areas,it is not essential to provide a soil suspension 7. Tree -r '^ ;'•:L'K"'9 w'.-�py4•__ or pavement suspension system beneath the abutting B. Bicycle Moped Parkin•w/Adda t we „..‘:•,.....t .}. sidewalk;however,it the specie of the vee is one that • _ t:^. ?. 2.+, -r '�'is is Planter . '-...'31-•k .f`fit' ;y':c-A, - is intended to grow to provide substantial clearances, 9. Underground Utilities(Wrapped in Root .. . . ''. ,•tii'+ • 1 ` they may be a good option to provide as much svuclural liarner) balance to the tree as possible. '.,r.s., 10.Soil Suspension System ' M, •„I L. „u,"li 11.Asphalt Paved Arca Viriiiiiillo' h-,,, . . ..' ”P:,4,41....._:,_,' ••:...4:4.....10,:. ,' Uto ^ ar } �Y ' • ' �wr W ,ky � u IIIj I WI ail. ® i.W > - ".a[.n'Y.=r.(.s. WI,.• ii. .1.r'.....;+1'...... .:./ 'S`--.7.'2k0!'. .n.:.r. :_.....•:-1.:':',;:;::.. "r..,,;.,...i.:,....:,,...-:',+:-... Page 1095 of 1576 Moan Irevsinbt::uuiBearhtii ncCunJilnros Iel Urban tlau,py"17��.Ihit' I l!'�'i 15.Tree/Palm Beyond 10inin Diameter)Bonded - . G E N R L I P L N T D ET L S 16 Irrigation iglition lKltcrilx,See Porous Paving 3"Depth Irrigation Plant&Details Compacted n Achieve A - 17.Irrigation rigotion Spray,See Level and Uniform Finish. A B Irrigation Plans 26.Addapave'tree Pit Mix .. 2Z 25 I GENERAL PLANTING DETAILS RECOMMENDED TO BE 18.Planting Soil Bi•kiwTree (6rl0ntm Diameter)Loose Root Package,Compacted'lb Aggregate Wedge Funnel 28 -:• --t - I INCORPORTED INTO THE CITY'S STANDARD DETAILS IN (ls�JUI%l Pmrtur 11 sward to Within 3 B^'rn - " "` ' THE PUBLIC WORKS MANUAL 19.Tree Root Package,Sire S/B"Below Final Finished Varies Grade. C ,' ' -. ; -i -- 20,Root Guide 12"Depth, 27.'lrce/Palm Rnotball Staking, �, 1• `f SUSPENDED PAVEMENT Silva Cell Deck. Install In B"Lifts,Eads Install Adjacent Concrete See Planting Details 20 - �I " !' { 1. Concrete Sidewalk,Turn Down to Silva Compacted To 95"G Proctor Edge.Top of Root Guide 2" 28.Compacted Suhgride Below Cell Deck at Edge of Walk. 9. Geugrid to Line Perimeter of System Below Top ol'Concrete. Sidewalks,Sec Civil Plan& 22 - ► o. i. 2. Load hearing Modular Suspended With 6"Toe(Outward from Base)And 21.Root Watering System,See Details Pavement System(Silva Cells with Deck, 12"Excess(Over'fop of Silva Cell Deck) Irrigation Plans 29.Concrete Sidewalk Base and Posts) 10.3/16"X 14"Zip Ties,Securing Geogrid 22.6"Aluminum Edge With 12" Thickened Edge(Turned \ f 3. Cub,Per Civil Plans to Silva Cells Stakes,See 1.:mdscape Edge Down to Soil Deck)Only 4. Curb Sub-Base,Per Civil Plans 11.Geotextile Fabric,Placed Below Retail Where Suil Cells Are Present 5. Roadway Compacted Subgrade,Per Aggregate Sub Base,See Specs. 23.417 Washed Aggregate 30.Silva Cells Shall lie Placed 1" _., - ._ ; _. . Civil Plans 12.4"Min.Aggregate Sub Base,Compacted base 3"Depth,Compact to To 6"Apart,Measured from ' 6. 4"Min.Aggregate Base Course,See tel 91%ProctorAchieve A Level and Uniform the Base of the A �B Specs. 13.Suhgmde Below Silva Cells,Compacted Finish. 31.Frames 7. Geutextile to Edge of Excavation,See to 91%Proctor 24.GeotexUle Fabric Separating 32.Silva Cell Anchor Spikes Specs. 14.Planting Soil Install In 12"Lifts,Each Aggregate from Planting Soil Shall Be Used to Maintain PLAN VIEW(TYPICAL) 8. Backlit],To Within 4-6"Below Top of Compacted to 70-80%Proctor. 25.Addapave Tree Pit.Mix(6- Spacing at the Base,Typical NOTE:CnntractorshalTinsCiil soil IE as per nimsulacturer s written specrlieations atl 1'i iid-AT slap Irian'ic:iliin5,ut•corllunclion wilFll these details and plans. 4'-0" 3.6" a• 6a • a 15 1810 Ii-' -4 25 i • ® © . �1\10 • 4*!tJii¼ •i• I .; ` <--.•:,...r 0 � a. �.. ' ti {=' :. 1Z` 12 a • Y O^ s 0 • •• S -l.• ( 1 - MIN. - 9 LZi t I � 14 __ +� o I i 18 11 - . �2' 6:: �2 • _..r 1.9 :._...,.:.�.. 27 O .. . ...... 13 • . 0:_l27 SECTION A-A SECTION 13-6SECTION.0-C • 152 Cay ul Nimmi ncadi age 1086 of 1576 limn,i c,,v i Master MeZC2U •,e-�- PALM TREE ROOT BARRIER (LINEAR APPLICATION} ::.;,. , .,.,.. FIXING SYSTEM +'_` .;` rye .' 1. Palm ret Fixing System: 1. Proposed Palm or Tree,Install per-Plantfng Details • r3 y ,.. .: , x-- 3aAtluminuntAlloy 2. Mulch laycr,jtcrflautinfDetails :� r` •Lrr •�' Anchors 3. Biob:iri icr Rout Control Fabric:Vcrlically'Placed to Stop Lateral • SI•. • `' ,/'?i{*' ,..`.:• 1 z'Iwu w;,y'I�urhi•l Root Growth.Install Fabric 2 Inches Below'lop of Concrete with „ t( •:.. ,.• ':f•r i l' ..•.??:" tensioner galvanized wire Adhesive(as Approved by 13iobarrier Manufacturer) t ./fI f • .3.x Rootb:ii prnleclion mesh. 4. Existing or Proposed Concrete Suit we ..!/'''',-----s, I 2. RootbaRl'rotectionMesh 5. Existing CurhorPavedSurfacc ;.: •:� '. 3. Two Way Ra[chet'fcnsioner 6.. Sub-Ras•e fi• n•Concrete Surface'I'ypic.d { •0 A Galvanized Wire 7. Praliosed•Roothall ' ' 1 • .. 4. AlurninumAllot Anchor,Typical U. "Hackfiltwi(h Planting Soil Mix;per Specifications /o .' S. Tree Planted:it Nusciy Linc 9,` E'xisti'ng Soil Typical • 6. lire Irrigationti stem O 9 y 0 I SM(16 ft.)ol'ntenrhrane 1 .."'' FJREMrOPSTi CT(MAI.AIII.Cnt[FSiii® - j) r_iurm(12")header:base YLKSIT ,(t))IUInUxs 7 :.- .. .___.._.. - - . . .. . _.. and debris cap Oi7 � ii°,.., 7. Aluminum cap(Ullnun 4" �i_.. 5 0 0 5 r ` �'• �i�.`� , =�=:,' ...1. 'Do not scae fro In this detail. ' (� I '�� a'1 is not drown to scale.• • . .._.4 4 .-C Due to settlement,contractor IC S► - , � l I ' on all trees& 6 shall re-tensa o planting is ); •r , r 4 atm_after - I r i o :.o.. .t i • • 7 'T o'•, nee STRUCTURAL SOILS TREE ROOTBALL PLANTING VIEW •.' '\• -''' o TYPICAL STREET PLA G FIXING SYSTEM + 1. Palm Tree Fixing System: •••• "S IN$TJILL ALONG WAWf R INSTALL ALONG Mg 1. Building Face • 3 x Allumintnn Alloy (TYPICAL(' - (TYPICAL) Z. Poured-in-Place Concrete ' Anchors' 3. Curb 1 x'Iwo way'r:ttchcl 4. Asphalt Pavement - .•tcnsioner galvanized wire • • • . v 5. Sub-base ., • 3 x Roothal protection mesh 6. Prepared Subgrade 2. Roothal)Protection Mesh 7. Drainage Pipe Tied to Storm Sewer 3. Two Way Ratchet Tensioner NOTES: • B. Structural Soil a Galvanized Wire 1. Contact Sunshine 811 prior to excavating to locate existing 9. 3"Thick Bark Mulch Layer L, 4. Aluminum Allot Anchor.Typical underground utilities. 5. Tree Planted al ousel}Line2. Root barrier fabric roll width shall be as indicated in the reference 6. Tree Irrigation System: schedule. ©•.. SM(16 tl.)of membrane 1 3. Install&cover bioharrier as soon as possible(within 12(tou ix) �,,; x:3(lcm(12")header,base after opening.Iligh temperatures and direct sunlight will reduce O X ..; -` 1 and debris cap effective product life. I� 7. Aluminum cap 1(IUmmn(4") 4. Install biobarricr fabric as shown with modules facing toward root balL .....,.NOTES: .. ... 5. When joining of3"overlap es frbrlc a minimum of .. 1. Do not scale front this dehait is required at all seams.Ilse a continuous adhesive bead at each manufacturer's recommendation. i; ' l'tiis di iitil is'rirt di:iw'ti fti scale: "' seam,per Z. Ihre Co settlement,cont racto 6. Refer to manutiicturer's specifications and recommended '� shall re-tension all tree & installation instructions!km-additional information. 4 palms alter planting and as • needed. ago 1087 of 1578 .rim,: %•Meth:"ls I.n 'i i::u:1 I I V:•.in?:.a:rt Hench ti e.:fic C:n:d:::rna 1 na I rLa❑taau py^':na':rt' 1 • UNIQUE OBSERVATIONS LEGEND AD A P SEAWALL • 'frees abutting or near seawalls should be planted at an I. Concrete Cap Extensionelevation that is a minimum of 4 feet above the highest 2. 2:1 Maximum Slope sea-level rise datum lines being targeted.This will allow 3. 4 Foot Minimum Height APPLICABLE TO ALL SEAWALL FRONTAGES any future responses of climate adaptation to take place 4. 12 Foot Minimum Width without negatively impacting the tree or without needing 5. Top of Berm 3 inches Below'fop of Cap In eliminate or relocate the tree. 6. Concrete Bulkhead 7. Maximum Targeted Sea Level Rise Projection SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Datum B. Metal Sheet Piles • The concrete cap extension on the seawall bulkhead does 9. Current Water Level ' t.: .r' 10.Tree not have to be tapered. f... • A rout barrier should he placed along the inside face of the seawall bulkhead to prevent the roots of the tree from -': `•- dislodging the anchoring of the cap on the bulkhead. • _R ?Yt" RECOMMENDED SPECIES rt.,• r -� 'tree,: w - All allowable species,without exception Palms: 0 - All allowable species,without exception © 0 00 t, . t . ; - • ' , O r l - " • y c - 0 .0 i • A't r4. .s 5, Sartilbe. t m+�i I *p • . ' ,. y? + +, , . ,tNwNO s � 'Y, I'l'.1'4,-, :-.rpo••:,. ,.itpi a ' p.,. :,•••,..t.-._ �. ...V?. *AC., . • -age I:a 14•I Crtv e:>laini tioar•I: nrbnn t,n•,t h1.is:rr Plan 2(120 UNIQUE OBSERVATIONS RECOMMENDED SPECIES ADA I' PLANTERS ` Street trees being planted on streets that are plainedto Trees: he raised should be planted within a raised container/ • All allowable species,except species with planted box a minimum 6'x 6'. When the street gets raised, overly aggressive root structures,such as APPLICABLE TO ALL FRONTAGES WHERE THE REMAINING any needed portions of the surrounding retaining walls Strangler Fig and Short-leaf Fig WALKABLE AREA MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ADA creating the container/planter can he eliminated and Palms: backfilled with amended planting soil.The provision tit • All allowable species,without exception CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. the gentextile fabric lining the inside of the planter will facilitate with this future improvement. LEGEND SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. Tree 2. Gcotextile Fabric -. _ • When aligned with the entrance to a building,planters 3. Datum of Future Road Elevation �a�� +? Y 'I , tic, should be a minimum of S feet away from any building 4. Retaining Wall `". `dfiflil sT tatade. This is because entrances(due to hurricane codes) S. Current Sidewalk Height PIlt �'��': tend to swing open outwards and may i n ract ADA access -� w.p.� • tr: ,Ip,t; 6 P Y 1 6. Comparted Sub-base ,- ,-------- along the sidewalk. 7. Planting Soil Mix r ,dill• t 8. Width V.iries Sized to Maximize Area for Root Growth{Optimum is 6'Minimum) t 9. Existing Road Elevation ' • :-fir.,,",' 10.Planting Area;Minimum 2'Clearance from 4" .rte,... a ., Face of Curb 'rr"O 1+ II Tr• ' •, ., t"i ' • '' ' f `— 2R� - v r © r .:: ';'S` , .f� I'll .f r y. �4+ T'� 4 -%.:. u, L` t '`i {':?,,--'1.-r,..';',?,,,� 1r�; r 1 r f �'y' r'e a. r ...ti..: . o A• � c.j. .:� _ ":T'r \` t*-y• .p .r-t r Lin iK.4.07,-,•17:73'777/.0. l r Y41 - - 1 lf• �� 1•t. y'*.. 4 time�r t ! .itic o 1 I 1 .....-'..".• �. -...... • ., - .. ¢�,7,+�. utx"N w �1' *.y`v4.1•." '"A.._ 1 14. { v f7 v. ` 1 N , Y :.!W s�rryT'' , • p ,: t•:-1.1:1 tan i'S_'wdl:a' 'age /:•U • tlrlia lain:, Nelh:xts tar:'Lm:ing'Ilr.,.in M:.1:111 Ih.,4.11 Spec he lord;any. 11:5 ,• _. ik . . .... . . --._--- i • ' 1 ' f,"' ,= ..,..• , er 4 i ' . _. _ ..,„. ' - i •.. .,=" .r, ,,.._ I t .,` 1" . • 4 z• , .2.?:-. ., •• , . • • . ,,,,.,_ 4,-, ! _,'• . ,,.i4 /. . I ,.:, ''' •• , • R-i . ' • * • V r C s... . . . r; , .,.. . I. 4 , • .7,,:t ,. • , , •., , ' •.• •...'" _ - ...t. ..., i ,a,, .; - •• , h ; - ',' !„-•3. % ..r. •-,..._ - .• , . . \ ,,. _,,,., _ „ g t, I ' •s. •-., 1 ... .z, ... „ • 1 . . •,,i•- , -, , . tr C II_ , . ,. ...., ,,,,., 11 .._ _— —— 1 goal:: 11. . k' • , . 1161.r i _ • V' • ! . --- i -• . _-- .2 ..„. # • .-.1'.1. • - - -,= al ' •• '' c:.' .,- r ,,..., . . t ' "IPA • 1,' ' , ? 'N, I .. •,18 .11'4 ZiVik -.....4 A 1 • ' : . , . - 1 . 1 Aw _ , . • : •L •-, e -..„. •.. • i„.. •.„. 1 ... . 4-, •L . ' ' _ • • - , „•,. ••,' , t. - , • . 4 • ,,.Al'•, • ,•::• • II - .' .1.• • ‘.,:,' 1 ,..li e:` ' I i \ 4 t,i.t ..r, ,, . . Il • .11.9 -1.....„. . , , . • • ‘,..,`•••-- ; . __ 1 . ,1 a i'-, ,- . , .::,:',- 1 - AT . , . , ,, . - .• ,e...! .. ; . .-. „,-1 •,. -. : • ..-: , - ,- , • i-.,. •: ,•,,,,- t - ,,,,, . . - i.... --2- ,•Au. ,,„; It.. -. 1 - ,..-„_. E . ,'/./. .. 'i-,,v .. 11 ,../'1,1'.3/: /: l74/--1:-. ::.•.,....'.-.,..1.1. :. '''''..". —:',1:1•:;;:..::ii :.,:‘..1,:t...i'i...!:r....1i;*1.::,,z-:k::":..::::...j.'....,..... I I I, , , ,,,, .,,,....„, ,)„,,,,/, ., ,..., . IF . , ,, i ,,,' •,.. ./.. 4; i , / k j2/..c”,C 1'••7e i i r.w'• •. 6.... _., I,i ' ,' • 11.1/ " . . 1 ,, * • ,„„. ,4•1 , ) ti , .. - 1 [Elj .', 2 4. LV Fr iif 1 I I 4 .....4 Ry.L. 1 • iker •i .,,---" •N. 4 -i•,., ,„- A• i •, ' ,.,. ,:11 _ i,‘'•- .."...• • ilk •.. ' "..;'I " 11,.• , f A \, -• kN'.,. ( t • .- - - ): e ; ..4-•- ', 'et (,, , 1 t Y. • 'I 7..4'-••• .. . 0)1 ‘'t I : { .• ,• A.4. i.1,. . ' • • f,1 , „ ' ''' ,la •".3.- \ ' if N t el . i ...- L' • hit : l• ,',.'i '''b , ' • •., ,et ' ",, V A , t 11 ••• • . .: ._ ' g,• )4,:.-........• ., • ,,.. -. •,--, I 7.,,., - .11 7- — .` , • ., -,.: •?-jf I I•I I ,, i -,- . ,.. v . • :..,. • . :c,.. •,:. & / V1., , '74. • t .'41114 ;r • i; MINUTES OF PUBLIC MEETINGS V. •. .; ••r:: MEETING MINUTES-PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY: • , IF, + J I ,. During the discovery phase of the llrhan Forestry Master plan development illitit t r process the City of Miami Beach and the project consultant team of Davey 1 N • h�� ,l� •I C it 1{dr I•-' Resource(troop and Calvin Giordano and Associates hosted two public j -i meetings in June 2019.The purpose of the meetings was to share with the r community details about Miami Beach's urban forest and get their input and It ' .1 _r feedback on the issues,challenges,and opportunities they see facing it.The I: - r -.A4.F.‘ _S _ 'c. killawrng is a summary of the input heard during the meetings. •r.r r — _ — • ,� . .4 - I _ " 4 Species: - - -" • 7�_ ' • Focus needs to be shifted on planting more shade trees and less palms. ' '•` • Look at the botanical garden for ore species possibilities. • Whyare we planting so many live oaks? Why doesn't the City consider •-'t ."C t'' _" - more Ficus trees? 11• -•A r = � Increasing speciesdiversity should beabig goal. Plant tree species that will absorb water. • '•I� :ItlII b „tI'IIF r •: s •4 rl yi • Wildlife should be considered in species Si.lection. lro: FI:N�i- Ir m+u c ' rr ..,.., ..«,.o;i r� �' • �'Aill:••,0'•:4]!!!1W-ii:••:• "M!I!`f • ...• T i ro � .• ROW/Swale Trees: • 14 - • _ s • Mainlrn;utce of ROW trees are the responsibility(Attie private «i°.;,•,-.7.-c•-• _ s property owners and they are not properly caring for these trees. 2::,,‘ 'a` _ t;_ ` • Policy shows that the city does not value the investment they have •,` • n__ e t. made in planting trees �r f' •. • Need to start addressing trees in poor condition right now! �..„ r ._ 1 • Need budgets that support proper infrastructure to allow trees to grow f„ : € .s. to maturity • T' ` `�" -c5—:•-•.4.:„::::.,4• • • There are new technologies out there that allow for green �:ZgiY infrasti ucttu'e and root space area tmdrr the hat dscapes �' "r....'�d.�1N! •.�.- •-r .�. ..s -. .. �. k-%. City Departments&Outside Agencies: t9j ° •i � Identify opportunities to partner with oIPl.to bury u utilitiesry 13 i 1 I' , - n { t;r M,..q4^ 11 :„.7,,,,,,, �� F4l yl _ — I 1 ,.M W uderground so we can plant more shade trees Jt , r ' o mo. 7 •; `:'� 4 XiX - • Need to prioritize shade trees and ensitiv that they are not Ail, f • '.11.19144w•'".':''' 't" ki.:• �!. ,,..,, .. 'V1 .4% IVr,, ' . : unnecessarily removed to ntcet other city priorities(i.e.sea a level rise 't • 14 1 , '4p. • ` ••,;-/,'-'-',4,••/•••; rJ,_�� M-.k •-',.:1144&b,.. Le .1 mitigation strategies) •age I• 0 pp,n+iires 167 • Need to try to keep mature trees instead of losing MEETING MINUTES-PUBLIC MEETING 1 that being inventoried:long with the trees? way/parks,the Coconut palms are not native,and them to capital improvement projects and having SUBJECT:SOUTH COMMUNITY PUBLIC MEETING • Can we have trees to be designated historic? palms do not provide the benefit that shade trees small trees replanted that will lake years to grow MEETING LOCATION:MIAMI BEACH GOLF CLUB • Omar:yes,we have trees designated as do. • City is good with plan reviews and asking for these DATE:06/18/2019 IleritageTrees. • The city created a commemorative tree program- things,but when it comes to a city project,theyATTENDEES: • More teeth in ordinances:Look at existing about 3 years ago. don't always follow their own requirements(due ordinances and possibly strengthen them? • How about adding Spanish moss(or air plants)to • CITY STAFF: MAR MICHAELLEDN CONNER,GIANNO FEOLI • More utilization of resources:Reuse wood beingall those oaks? to budget constraints). • CGA STAFF: • Need to partner and engage better with FOOT removed,and more recycling of Materials. • Fairchild Gardens-offered the city tine orchids • DAVIE RESOURCE GROUP:KERRY GRAY (hoar:Snimetimes we use straps for securing rent one has slanted • flow do we get them to allow trees and vegetation p' (antiplanted). along FOOT roads? rout ball instead of2x4 wood braces for • Where is the business community in all of this? Discussion and Questions: staking trees in tight areas. • Need t+talk ahout climate change,riot just sea Private Property: • flow did the consultants get selected arid why level rise'?Because if we du,then we have(o talk • The key to increasing canopy cover is planting on now?How long is the project going to take? MEETING MINUTES-PUBLIC MEETING 2 about trees,don't we? private property • Are we going to deal with F.U.U.'I'? SUBJECT:NORTH BEACH COMMUNITY PUBLIC MEETING • Did not like this,hut the city(a few years ago) • Need to encourage shade tree planting on private ▪ Why are the planting so many Live Oak;? MEETING LOCATION:NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY passed a policy that maintenance iii P.O.W.trees property • Why doesn't the city consider more Ficus trees? CENTER goes to the private property owners,and they • (:uusider tax breaks fur residents who are planting • We have so much concrete that we clout allow don't do it right.+lot of the times. water to drain thru the soil or Bio-swales.The : 06/19/2019 • Wh does the cit• staff stand back and let shade trees ATTENDEES: y y • Need to have a"blueprint"for residents-what to city just wants to pump the water out as fast as this happen?Omar-this plan may include plant,where to plant,and how to maintain trees. possible. CITY STAFF:OMAR LEON• recommendations on maintaining the trees better. • Engage with every hotel and business and tell • Oniar:Green infrastructure will he coordinated • CGA STAFF:MICHAEL CONNER,GIANNO FEOLI • Need to siert addressing trees in pour condition them how to care and plant trees on their properly with gray infrastructure •• DAVIE RESOURCE GROUP:KERRY GRAY right now! • Re:diseases/pests-By planting trees that are more • Need to try and keep our mature trees instead of resilient will help prevent that and having to use Discussion andQuestions: them in these capital improvement projects Development: losingP' { i ' • Look at making buildings/new construction more pesticides/chemicals. • To get to 22%canopy-how much of planting sites (we'll just remove the large trees and plan to plant greener(e.g.rooftop terraces/gardens;green • Omar:That is why we implemented the tree is private vs public? new trees to lit better in this place,which will take walls) preservation ordinance • Was the tree canopy assessment broken down that years to grow). • Fll-O.T wants to move traffic as last as possible way?Omar:No • Need to get the city to understand that they General: • !low do we get them to allow trees and vegetation'! • The pattern,I have seen is that R.O.W.s in the city need to budget more money for the proper • Need to change attitude of community around tree The state has used these streets for years with tend to gel palms. infrastructure to allow fi 'these trees to grow to etre and protection poor planning •• If we get FPI.to underground the lines,then we their maturity. • Need to engage the business community in urban • Doesn't like the"spnngey"poured in place self can plant more shade trees. • I am an advocate for benches-there are none on I'orestry around trees(Plexi pave) • Why is that(22%)a gull?(Kerry)Iris not the goal 41st.,etc.Make this city more humane.Why not • Reduce/soften the"concrete"look-only if it is • Increase dive'sitybig goal just the U.T.C.analysis and results. add benches in:areas where we plant trees? addingii planter here and there. • Will there he any more community meetings in • Will we be requiring or encouraging planting on • Re:property owners maintaining R.U.W.trees, • Get everyone involved and all working together to September(for draft of plans)? private property? This City policy shows that it does not value the Omar:we will have one on one meetings with • Arc we looking at the buildings/new investment that is beingmade in alantin then. iropnweuresandurecauopyinMiamiBeac•h- I: making planting residents,business,hotels,developers,etc. certain neighborhoods/groups.Plus,meeting construction greener,too?(i.e.roof-tops,terrace • Are we reaching out to the County to see they have • Better utilize resources-use wood limn removed with Sustainability and Resiliency Commitee. gardens,green walls?). some incentives? trees for furniture.:and other home goods. • Also,we are looking specifically at Pine Tree Drive • The city is trying to get more pervious area by • Example:possible tax hreaks for residents who are (In conjunction with County's project to mill and code/ordinance(50%).That was adopted recently planting trees? resurface the roads,we will prune Australian • We are giving away trees to residents,ton. • Pine Tree Drive project:(hear:trying to preserve Pitres,and deal with any structural detects.We am • Onnar•:Landscape codes requires certain number the Australian fines as much as possible,they arc . preserving there,not removing them. of trees and tree preservation. on a 3 year cycle.arborist assessing them-have • F.D.o.T.is doing a double left turn lane at Alton • We live in Lake View-getting ready to have lots to prune Utenr a lot to reduce mass&stress on Road&Michigan;is anyone looking al roots of of trees removed.(under the disguise of sea level trunks. mahogany trees there? rise).I grew up here,city doesn't care-developers • Need tai reduce/soften the"concrete-look--only if • I am a Blue water advocate.We need trees that do what they want-why not add color/poincianas. it is adding a plainer here and there. absorb water.Looking at species for this&wildlife. It could be a"garden of•Eden"again. • !lave to change attitude on a whole another level! Will plan include recommendations for this to • Kerry:'this plan will be a start. • Get everyone involved•residents,business,hotels, homeowners? • Need to change attitude of entire community- developers,etc.All working together. • On Alton ltd.there is a yard that has a big ruining paradise. • Need to have a"blueprint'for residents-what to Mahogany with lots of moss,ferns,orchids,etc.Is • Please du not pia at any noire palms in the right of plant,where to plant,and how to maintain trees. IMO City aMaui Reach Page 1092 of 1576 I ,.u:roar-,[Master Pim:2020 • • I.00katthe botanical garden for .j ' 1 } . •' possibilities. ti, \t; I r, y/ i • Note/state that we need to bring the A• ' _ ;-:N t 1 - stress level down for everyone. -tis.',:c- .. = j, . • Look at seasnuolity of flowering trees , • .. IrY • E: : : ::: 5. Ilia • ia', y t , i or met with them yet?Omar:we are B` A-A . going to. 11' v �' �( ' T• • Omar was asked if he is involved with • - • I all the neighborhood projects/G.O. I 4t ', i ti 13011(1 projects?Omar:yes,we are ,44 I h ,4 usually E::::11 _—___R•.• � ti. —' —.,.• •There arere h 'd l • I ` _-_•` that allow tier green infrastructure and t k{ \ ''t - '� �' • -_ • root space area under the hardscapes - ' t,:•-• -" ' F: l r.:..;1 T�. ..• • City is good with plan reviews and ._ - , f' i r asking for these things,but when _ 3i •it comes to a city project,they / sometimes bend the rules[due to II " ' budget comataints). .. - • • Need to go to every hotel and business ••••,'and tell them how to do it. �" - �•,;t,r;=r,..��a , . ♦ •t.:: .•,./ / 5 r• { i . - - • ••.+�'._+ .fie 111 ' Tb.�u,i4 • `�, %.464 1 i . 5:.131;.•. „ —• ' I ' - _ "• F 04%1'1," V •. . . • .. . r y', rtWi3,4h,•• . r:L' • . i • tyr p i,. .r•- ; :. ; + i-.— • k •age e• o • dppemiIt r, 1ev ;h l III ' ..: R r1ilI1 it , t.: [ s. t !• II:_-'; IL\ , :,.. ,,- ,. 1,,, 1 I t . r r • . ..i.z,s. 4000. . • I .. I 1 I r • ' I f jgm1 , K I Wil ,r - — jtri ())))y.-� ` r.1 d'1'i' �r ;'�It, �� ; -f •rt,{ I 1 •. a/ 1 _ 111 -1 1 r- i .`:` + U t / - }b�• • .rjl. f • it { ' ' gt . . • ' .;r �� ti y••, Oillfrigi4 .._-.......-:-----..-&-'-' • -.6.---.-s• •--v-.t.•--- 2 > r -9 - ::.. 4. , .}nyj i Mil' 't. GIS ANALYSIS i ti I - f. ! _ 1. MIAMI BEACH GIS DATA ANALYSIS: } , • 4 Urban Heat Island Effect: -. 111:/011111100/1" %� �_ ,%, rDRG used Landsat 8 imagery that was captured during summer conditions en i/ to conduct a land surface temperature analysis.The analysis models surface -, �" temperatures and estimate urban heat Island effects.'the surface temperature is analyzed from the Landsat data to determine how/if tree canopy is reducing • heat islands by measuring land surface temperature emissivity using NI)VI S , �. values.The temperature analysis was used to determine the highest surface ' temperature that was observed during the year. . i, ., - Historical Canopy Assessment: ' To assess changes in the city-wide tree canopy cover,DRG compared the cent tree canopyfound based on 2017 one-meter NAIP ��. per fou imagery e nay cvy analysts to � . ..�. older aerial imagery that was provided by the city DRG used point sampling method within ArcGJS to compare/capture city wide tree canopy cover percent l `7yf ds for up to three different periods,1941 and 1969 histor real periods rr.. f I. f �uII�I t. ._.. .. __ . '_- _..iy .p'ti ROW canopy Assessment: - .:.,.,' URG used the tree canopy layer and street centerline data to assess the percent .,,. -+ of tree canopy cover within the Right of ways in the City.DRG during the GIS ti� ,. Z. analysis created a buffer distance around the st-eel centerlines to capture the sklewalks.'Iree canopy percent was then estimated for the areas within the ; newly created buffer area around the right of ways. ! , ....._:,...... ..6.2,L.„L . -.•i • .. _ -+.� +—_-�.{�_i.- - ... • Page 1095 of 1576