The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution 2020-31472 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-31472 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, TO PROCEED WITH OPTION 3A FOR THE LOCATION OF THE ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND COMPONENTS OF THE STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, AS PART OF THE WEST AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AS SET FORTH IN ATTACHMENT 1 ACCOMPANYING THIS RESOLUTION, TO PLACE ALL COMPONENTS AT 1671 WEST AVENUE (CITY PARKING LOT P24) WITH THE DISCHARGE OUTFALL AT 17TH STREET AND COLLINS CANAL. WHEREAS,the West Avenue Phase II Improvements(the"Project")is a comprehensively defined neighborhood improvement project that is focused on resolving challenges associated with climate impacts and the City's aging infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the proposed improvements within the West Avenue neighborhood include raising the paved roadway, harmonization to the adjacent properties, installation of a new robust storm water treatment and pumping system ("Stormwater Treatment System" or "SWTS"), replacement of the existing water distribution/transmission system, gravity sanitary sewers, installation of new street lighting, pedestrian lighting, replace existing and install new signalized intersection with mast arms, new landscaping, irrigation and construction of a new baywalk segment; and WHEREAS, the Project will incorporate the improvements on West Avenue between 8 Street and Lincoln Road, including side streets, and Bay Road between 14 Street and Collins Canal; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer's office, acting as the Design Criteria Professional, identified the need for an additional SWTS based on a drainage report prepared by a AECOM, and determined the location for the SWTS to be at the street end on Lincoln Road and the bay; and WHEREAS, a SWTS is a mechanical system that accelerates the movement or discharge of stormwater, and the simplest way to analyze this STWS is to divide it into above ground and below ground components; and • WHEREAS, the above ground components are all related to power supply and controlling the SWTS, including an electrical panel platform, an auxiliary power generator, and FPL electrical vault structure; and WHEREAS, the below ground components of the SWTS mechanically separate contaminant particulates from the stormwater, provide short term storage of the stormwater, and mechanically force the collected and treated stormwater into injection wells and Biscayne Bay, and the components also include stormwater drains, bar screen (trash rack), pollution control structures (Vortex), floatable separation, stormwater injection wells, wet well, outfall and emergency by-pass pipes; and WHEREAS, the location of the SWTS components is a major aspect of the scope of work for the West Avenue Phase II Improvements Project,and the location of these critical components requires in depth analysis of numerous factors, including engineering feasibility, constructability, operation/maintenance, safety, regulatory requirements, community impact, aesthetics, impact to other facilities (i.e. parking), and cost; and WHEREAS, on July 31, 2017, the design-builder, Ric-Man Construction Florida (the "Design/Builder") began working on the West Avenue Phase II Improvement Project, and the Design/Builder's team includes and CES Consultants as the engineer of record; and WHEREAS, the Design/Builder is a heavy civil construction firm that has been in the construction industry for over 35 years and are leaders in the industry that have earned their reputation for delivering challenging projects on time, on budget, and in a safe environment, and they specialize in offering innovative solutions to a wide range of projects, from pipeline and sea level rise work to marine construction and old underground systems rehabilitations; and WHEREAS, CES Consultants is a minority-owned corporation providing engineering services to municipal, governmental, and private sectors throughout Florida and New York, and CES Consultants has engineered some of the largest infrastructure improvement projects in Florida; and WHEREAS, throughout the entire Project, the team has conducted extensive public outreach, including continuous communication with the West Avenue Neighborhood Association (WAVNA), electronic email updates, open office hours, neighborhood walk-throughs, property specific one-on-one meetings with the project team, regular updates at the Land Use and Sustainability Committee, and more; and WHEREAS, in preparation for property specific meetings, the Project team has prepared harmonization plans for 192 locations and community feedback related to the SWTS has been garnered on numerous occasions, via private and publicly noticed meetings; and WHEREAS, in preparation for the Special City Commission Meeting on October 28, 2020, the Project team has prepared a virtual presentation for the community to provide feedback and the project information was shared via dedicated emails and included in the twice-a-week email updates that are distributed citywide and the information has also been shared on Nextdoor and other social media; and WHEREAS,at the May 6,2020 Land Use and Sustainability Committee("LUSC")meeting, the recommended location of the SWTS components, including all analyzed alternative locations, for the Project were presented and discussed, and the presentation of the siting of the SWTS components included an overview of the multiple alternate locations and iterations and the challenges posed by each and the Committee's recommendation was to perform additional feasibility studies on alternate locations; and WHEREAS, the LUSC also inquired how the community had been kept informed of the Project and how additional feasibility studies could impact the Project, and City staff provided an overview of the delays the Project could face and the impact that it will have on the design for the water quality enhancements required by Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management; and WHEREAS, the LUSC passed a motion to direct City staff to conduct additional feasibility studies and provide an order of magnitude construction cost estimate and address if the SWTS can be re-engineered to work at an alternate location; and WHEREAS, in response to the feedback from LUSC, as well as input from the community, the City Administration determined that the Project was best served by expanding the scope of the recommendation of LUSC, and proceeding with an accelerated feasibility study for a total of 12 options for the location of the SWTS; and WHEREAS, a directive was given to the Design/Builder to proceed with the accelerated feasibility study for the additional locations and iterations in the amount of$207,776; and WHEREAS, the accelerated feasibility study identifies, validates, and compares various options for the final location of the project's SWTS, and the accelerated feasibility study is attached to the Commission Memorandum accompanying this Resolution as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the feasibility study identifies additional potential locations, to determine if it is possible to relocate the SWTS, and what kind of impact will it have on the Project and the community and in order to determine if an option is feasible and if the option meets the minimum requirements of the Project's needs; and WHEREAS, the Project minimum requirements include meeting a 10-year theoretical storm event, identifying potential environmental contamination at each site, and identifying any potential permitting issues, and once it was determined that an option is feasible for relocation, the physical impacts to the City and its residents' day to day lives were analyzed; and WHEREAS,physical impacts to the City and its residents'day to day lives include potential visual impairment, loss of parking, potential impacts to utility corridors within the public right of way, and impacts to operations, maintenance, and safety of city's public works employees; and WHEREAS, the design team evaluated 12 options at various locations for the placement of the SWTS, including the generator, and provided an accelerated feasibility study which includes a Summary of Options attached to this Resolution as"Attachment 1"; and WHEREAS,the Summary of Options explains the 12 options and prioritizes them into four (4) categories: 1. Base recommendation: includes the original option recommended by the Design/Builder team and currently included in the design; 2. Highly Preferred recommendation: includes a compromised option, that takes into consideration both the engineering and safety factors and the community concerns; 3. Preferred recommendation: includes four(4)feasible options that are less desirable due to operations and safety concerns; and 4. Not recommended: includes five(5)options that were studied and are not recommended; and WHEREAS, Option 3A relocates above ground and below ground components of the SWTS at 1671 West Avenue (City Parking Lot P24)with the discharge outfall at 17th Street and Collins Canal; and WHEREAS, Option 3A provides the location preferred by the Community, and it meets the design parameters, with the exception of having the ability to accommodate emergency bypass piping; and WHEREAS, Option 3A has an estimated cost impact of$2,875,000: and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the selection of this option will have a time impact of 325 days for the start of the construction on the Project, representing an additional 175 days from the base recommendation; and WHEREAS, other options in the feasibility study pose many challenges, including engineering, regulatory, safety, parking, cost, scheduling, impact to adjacent properties, operation/maintenance and traffic circulation, especially when considering the technical requirements necessary for the placement of the equipment; and WHEREAS, this Project has been separated into two distinct areas, with 14th Street serving as the dividing boundary; and WHEREAS, the overall original Project budget was originally$56,108,748, and additional funds were added to the Project related to hardscape scope, to incorporate scope related to the Columbia Resiliency Accelerator program, and for design costs associated with additional water quality treatment system as requested by DERM, bringing the total project budget to$90,140,819; and WHEREAS, in addition to any additional costs associated with the siting of the SWTS components, the Project will also require additional funding for construction of the additional water quality enhancements required by Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (approx. $10M- $15M) and construction costs for upsized stormwater piping resulting from the change of stormwater criteria from a 5-year to a 10-year design storm event (approx. $3M); and WHEREAS, at the September 13, 2017 commission meeting, the City Commission passed a Resolution providing that the SWTS would require auxiliary power generators, and as a result, a change order was issued to the Design/Builder team to include the installation of nine (9) generators at the existing and proposed SWTS, located at the street-ends of 5th Street, 6th Street, 10th Street, 14th Street, Bay Road and at the new SWTS proposed for Lincoln Road; and WHEREAS, on October 14th, 2020, the City Commission passed a Resolution implementing auxiliary power generators for SWTS on a case-by-case basis; and WHEREAS, FP&L has introduced a new program that provides independent redundant electrical service system for critical infrastructure, including SWTS and this program could potentially reduce some of the concerns regarding power outages and the operation of the SWTS; and WHEREAS, the City Administration is prepared to recommend excluding auxiliary power generators from the West Avenue Project, contingent on evaluation of the electrical reliability data that will be provided by FP&L; and WHEREAS, excluding auxiliary power generators from the West Avenue Project could result in a savings of approximately$4.5 million; and WHEREAS, once a determination is made regarding the siting of the SWTS, City staff will issue a directive to the Design/Builder to submit a proposal for the re-design and construction of the revised SWTS, and a change order will be presented at a forthcoming Commission Meeting; and 1 WHEREAS, upon execution of the change order, the Design/Builder will revise the plans and submit to the agencies for permitting and the construction activities could commence in early 2022, provided permits are obtained and all necessary harmonization agreements have been executed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA that the Mayor and City Commission hereby direct the administration to proceed with Option 3A for the location of the above and below ground components of the stormwater treatment system, as part of the West Avenue Phase II Improvements Project, as set forth in Attachment 1 accompanying this Resolution, to place all components at 1671 West Avenue (City Parking Lot P24)with the discharge outfall at 17th Street and Collins Canal. PASSED and ADOPTED this a?g day of 0 c47)6e'r , 2020. 1‘;2y-1-----.__ Dan Gelber, Mayor ATTEST: Ll Rafael E. Granado, ity Jerk Version with Mayor's Requested Revisions Sponsored by Mayor Gelber and Co-sponsored by Commissioners Meiner, Richardson, GOngora, and Vice-Mayor Samuelian APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION ::.) ,,T,„:„< „, f\R5--ri-# 0 _ 2, z.- 2,0 '.ii;CO ,f,'M.:lE �'1 ATTACHMENT 1 Stormwater Treatment System at Lincoln Road, Summary of Options Emergency Option Location Component Locafion iimimgreued Generator Location FPL Vault Location Control Pane(s)I Location storr 1"em Gravity Cost Impact A To Option 1 CemMmiien rime Reerimmendation m Pipin . Impact(Dcrys) Bypass Lincoln Court R.Bay Road; Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay 1 Lincoln Rd Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd J ..1 sLaosAno SO 150 Base SWTS at Lincoln Road Rd Rd Control Panels at Lincoln 2 Lincoln Rd 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd i .." S2,620,000 SB15,000 150 Highly Preferred Road;All else at 1671 SWIS arid all EQ to 1671- 3 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 7671 West Ave 1671 West Ave MI= S4.296.000 $2,491,000 360 Preferred Dischar.e at Lincoln Road SWTS and EQ to 1671' 3A ' 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1„ 52,875,000 51,070,000 325 Preferred Discharge al 171h , _ . .... .... 4 5-year Storm/10-year Piping: Lincoln Rd '' Lincoln Rd End i Lincoln Rd End Lincoln Rd End „ I 1 ($2,63Z876) ($4.437.876)' 90 ii Not Recommended 1 r i 4A 5-year Storm/10-year Piping, Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay, Lincoln a ond Bay Rd ,1 I Lincoln Rd .', 1 i S2.028,900 I; 5223.900 I 180 ! Not Recommended &Structures RD I Rd , 5 i 2 SWTS @ Lincoln Road&Bay Lincoln Ct and Boy,'Lincoln Ct and Bay:;,Lincoln Ct and Bay;', Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd 1 ; 1 ,i$2, , "i $324,076 360 'i IL Not Recommended I Road Rd RD 1 Rd ` i; tl 129076.2 L 6 WTS at Lincoln;All EQ at 1671 Lincoln Rd 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1 $1,857,000 352,000 150 Preferred , 7 ,Upgrade 6Th.10a 142'StSWTS; 611).10111.141b, '6th,10th,14th,Lincoln 61"°th;l4th' :: 6th.101h,14th,Uncoln I ; 1 ($87.000) I'($1,892,000);, 480 - , Not Recommended ; Downgrade Lincoln SWTS- : Lincoln ; Lincoln 'L' I t Effmlnate Gen Set;SIAM and , Lincoln Rd I Lincoln Ct and BOV'; 0 N/A Lincoln Ct , Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd ,; 1 1 ; $461).537 :($1.336,463) 150 ! Not Recommended 1 EQ at Lincoln 1 , 9 SWIS at LinC0111 Rd;All EQ at Lincoln Rd 1625 West Ave 1625 We5t Ave 1625 West Ave ;1 I $1,010,000 $5,000 150 Preferred i ' i i ,'• I -f, i ; 10 ' Above Ground EQ a , Lincoln Rd ', Gaythering Hotel '` Gaythenng Hotel ' Gaythering Hotel „ 1 I, 1 i 53,200.000 I $1.395,000 ;; Min.420 ' Not Recommended ; Goylhering Hotel - , Engineering&Construction Perspective: Base: D/B Team Recommended Highly Preferred Recommendation Preferred Recommendation , Not Recommended 1 ,_ _1 Resolutions - R7 B MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: October 28, 2020 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADMINISTRATION FOR THE SITING OF THE STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND COMPONENTS) AS INDICATED IN OPTION 2, LOCATING THE BELOW GROUND COMPONENTS AT THE STREET-END OF LINCOLN ROAD, THE ABOVE GROUND CONTROL PANELS WITHIN THE MEDIAN OF THE 1400 BLOCK OF LINCOLN ROAD, AND THE GENERATOR AND FPL VAULT AT 1671 WEST AVENUE (CITY PARKING LOT P24), FOR THE WEST AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The West Avenue Phase II Improvements (The "Project") represents a comprehensively defined neighborhood improvement program, focused on resolving challenges associated to climate impacts and ancient infrastructure. The extent of the Project is West Avenue between 8 Street and Lincoln Road, including side streets, and Bay Road between 14 Street and Collins Canal. The proposed improvements within the neighborhood include the design and construction of a Stormwater Treatment System (SWTS) at the street-end on Lincoln Road and the bay. It is important to understand each component of a SWTS, what each component does, and how it could impact the community. A SWTS is a mechanical system that accelerates the movement or discharge of stormwater. The simplest way to analyze this STWS is to divide it into above ground and below ground components. The above ground components are all related to power supply and controlling the SWTS. This project includes an electrical panel platform, an auxiliary power generator, and FPL electrical vault structure. The electrical panel platform is the nerve center to the SWTS. This platform houses all the electrical and communications equipment that provides power to the pumps. It also is programmed to direct which pump to turn on and off, and to operate at desired speeds to produce only the necessary output while conserving energy. The auxiliary power will be able to power the entire SWTS in the event that there is a loss of power. The FPL electrical vault is essential to provide power to the SWTS. It houses the transformers and other equipment required to properly power the system and provides redundancy through three independent power feeds. Page 26 of 370 The below ground components mechanically separate contaminant particulates from the stormwater, provide short term storage of the stormwater, and mechanically force the collected and treated stormwater into injection wells and Biscayne Bay. The components include stormwater drains, bar screen (trash rack), pollution control structures (Vortex), floatable separation, stormwater injection wells, wet well, outfall and emergency by-pass pipes. The stormwater drains capture the rain fall with a network of collection structures and pipes that conveys it towards the SWTS. The bar screen captures large solids that may have entered the drainage system. The pollution control structures capture small particles, the size of a grain of sand. The wet well is where the pumping system is located and where floatable separation occurs. The submersible pumps will transfer the stormwater from the wet well into Biscayne Bay through the outfall pipes. Stormwater injection wells provides additional water quality treatment for the initial rainfall. Emergency by-pass pipes allows the station to discharge stormwater without the need for pumps in case of a mechanical failure. The siting of the SWTS components comprise a major aspect of the scope of work for the West Avenue Phase I I Improvements project. The location of these critical assets requires in depth analysis of numerous factors, including engineering feasibility, constructability, operation/maintenance, safety, regulatory requirements, community impact, aesthetics, impact to other facilities (i.e. parking) and cost. On July 31,2017, the Design/Builder, began working on the West Avenue Phase II Improvement project. The Design/Builder's team includes Ric-Man Construction Florida (RMCF) as the prime, and CES Consultants (CES) as the engineer of record. After performing a design level analysis of numerous alternatives for the siting of the SWTS, the Design/Builder recommended siting the SWTS below ground components at the street end of Lincoln Road and the above ground components within the median of the 1400 block of Lincoln Road. The analysis conducted by the Design/Builder included a list of alternate locations and iterations for the siting of the SWTS, with an evaluation of the feasibility of each site, related to the physical constraints on the layout of all the components and existing utilities. Public Outreach Throughout the life of the project, the team has conducted extensive public outreach, including continuous communication with the West Avenue Neighborhood Association (WAvNA), electronic email updates, open office hours, neighborhood walk-throughs, property specific one- on-one meetings with the project team, regular updates at the Land Use and Sustainability Committee, and more. In preparation for property specific meetings, the project team has prepared harmonization plans for 192 locations. Community feedback related to the SWTS has been garnered on numerous occasions, via private and publicly noticed meetings, some of these occasions include: • Columbia Resilience Accelerator— public sessions on August 6 and August 8, 2018 • Public Information Meeting #2 (Mondrian Hotel)— May 9, 2019 • Lincoln Court Neighborhood Association — July 2, 2019 • West Avenue Neighborhood Association (WAVNA) presentation to membership — October 1 , 2019 • North of Fifth Neighborhood Association — September 12, 2018, March 26, 2019, July 23, 2019 Page 27 of 370 • WAVNA coordination meetings with representatives —April 9, 2019, April 26, 2019, November 1, 2019, February 14, 2020, March 13, 2020, April 10, 2020, May 1, 2020 • Meeting with 1400 Lincoln Road and The Hotel Gaythering representatives with Commissioner Samuelian — September 25, 2019 • Community hosted meetings to discuss alternatives (at the Gaythering) — November 20, 2019 where City was invited to participate • Additional meetings with 1400 Lincoln Road and Gaythering representatives — December 6 and December 13, 2019 • West Avenue Open Office Hours — Offered Fridays by appointment between 10 a.m. and noon since November 2019 • Land Use and Sustainability Committee Meeting — May 6, 2020 and May 26, 2020 In preparation for the Special Commission on October 28, the team has prepared a virtual presentation for the community provide feedback. The project information was shared via dedicated emails and included in the twice-a-week email updates that are distributed citywide. The information has also been shared on Nextdoor and social. The virtual presentation has more than 450 views online as of October 20, 2020. The project team has also scheduled meetings with Neighborhood Association groups. In our commitment to transparency, all questions and comments that are submitted via email are included in a tracking document that has been posted on the project page. (Exhibit A) Land Use and Sustainability Committee (LUSC) At the May 6, 2020 LUSC meeting, the recommended location of the SWTS components, including all analyzed alternative locations, for the Project were presented and discussed. The presentation of the siting of the SWTS components included an overview of the multiple alternate locations and iterations, and the challenges posed by each. The Committee's recommendation was to perform additional feasibility studies on alternate locations. Upon review of the preceding, the LUSC passed a motion to direct City staff to conduct additional feasibility studies, provide an order of magnitude construction cost estimate and address if the SWTS can be re-engineered to work at an alternate location. In response to the feedback from LUSC, as well as input from the community, the City Administration determined that the project was best served by expanding the scope of the recommendation of LUSC, and proceeding with an accelerated feasibility study for a total of 12 iterations for the siting of the SWTS. ANALYSIS A directive was given to the Design/Builder to proceed with the accelerated feasibility study of the additional locations and iterations in the amount of $207,776. The feasibility study identifies, validates, and compares various options for the final location of the project's SWTS. The effort placed into this feasibility study was to identify additional potential locations, to determine if it is possible to relocate the SWTS, and what kind of impact will it have on the project and the community. In order to determine if an option is feasible, it was verified that it meets the minimum requirements of the project's needs. This includes meeting Page 28 of 370 the 10-year theoretical storm event, potential environmental contamination at each site, and any potential permitting issues. Once it was determined that an option is feasible for relocation, the physical impacts to the City and its residents' day to day lives were analyzed. These impacts include potential visual impairment, loss of parking, potential impacts to utility corridors within the public right of way, and impacts to operations, maintenance, and safety of city's public works employees. The design team evaluated 12 options at various locations for the placement of the SWTS, including the generator, and provided an accelerated feasibility study (Exhibit B) which is summarized in the attached presentation (Exhibit C). The Design/Builder prepared a summary matrix (See Attachment 1) reflecting the 12 options and prioritizes them into four (4) categories: Base recommendation, includes the original option recommended by the Design/Builder team and currently included in the design; Highly Preferred recommendation, includes a compromised option, that takes into consideration both the engineering and safety factors and the community concerns; Preferred recommendation, includes four (4) feasible options that are less desirable due to operations and safety concerns; Not recommended includes five (5) options that were studied and are not recommended. As a result of the accelerated feasibility study and feedback received, the Design/Builder team offers as a highly preferred alternative, option 2, which maintains the SWTS underground components at the Lincoln Road street-end, the above ground control panels platform at the median between Bay Road and Lincoln Court and relocating the generator and the FPL vault to 1671 West Avenue (City Parking Lot P24). This option is a good compromise of engineering requirements and the community's interest, as it offers to maintain the line of sight between the control panels platform and the wet well, which is extremely important for the safety of the operation personnel, and it reduces the size of the median by 60%, addressing one of the main community concerns. The details that make this option a Highly preferred one are: • Engineering feasibility: o Emergency bypass piping: Having the wet well located in the proximity to the Lincoln Road street-end and seawall, allows for the installation of emergency bypass piping. These pipes will discharge any stormwater that reaches a certain elevation by means of gravity. This is important because if the station becomes overwhelmed due to power failure or mechanical failure, there is a means to discharge excess stormwater. o FPL has confirmed the ability to provide the necessary power supply if the vault is relocated to 1671 West Avenue. o Fire Department approved median location with regard to regulations and required access. • Operation/maintenance and safety factors: o Maintaining a close proximity from the electrical control platform to the actual SWTS (approximately 200 feet) improves operator safety. Maintaining a line of sight from the electrical equipment to the SWTS, the maintenance crew can interact without communication, maintaining a safe operation without increasing the annual operating cost. • Community impact, aesthetics: o The median will include screening and canopy cover to promote traffic calming and creates a promenade type atmosphere with flush sidewalks and roadway pavers in addition to new amenities at the street-end. Page 29 of 370 o Reduction in the loss of Parking Spaces. There is a strong possibility that with further design development some parking spaces may be accommodated. o The new median housing the control panels platform, will have a footprint of approximately 1,400 square feet, similar in footprint and height to the Sunset Harbour SWTS. By removing the generator and FPL electrical vault from the median concept the footprint is being reduced by approximately 2,000 square feet and the overall height by 2.5 feet. A screening system will be designed to give full enclosure and visibly shield all the electrical components from the residents. This screening system is being incorporated in the design, and it will be constructed at the same time as the SWTS, unlike the Sunset Harbour SWTS screening, that was an after the fact design and installation. • Cost: o This option is estimated to have a cost impact of an additional $2,620,000 The other explored options pose many challenges, including engineering, regulatory, safety, parking, cost, scheduling, impact to adjacent properties, operation/maintenance and traffic circulation, when considering the technical requirements necessary for the placement of the equipment. Options 3 and 3A are very similar options, with the exception of the location of the outfall, as such, both share the same disadvantage of not providing the ability to accommodate emergency bypass piping. Options 6 and 9 do allow for the installation of emergency bypass piping; however, neither option provides a direct line of sight from the electrical control platform to the wet well, causing safety and maintenance concerns that require the installation of a platform to house six (6) additional disconnect switch cabinets at the Lincoln Road street-end. City staff has continued their outreach efforts. On October 12, 2020 a dedicated email blast was sent to the citywide contact list which included links to a virtual presentation of the findings of the accelerated feasibility study and notification of the Special Commission Meeting. The information has been shared on Nextdoor and other social media. Additionally, follow-up virtual meetings have been held with stakeholders and WAVNA members to answer questions regarding the virtual presentation. Financial Status This project was divided into two areas, with 14th Street serving as the dividing boundary. The overall original project budget was $56,108,748. Additional funds have been added to the project related to hardscape scope, additional scope related to the Columbia Resiliency Accelerator program, design cost for the additional water quality treatment system as requested by DERM, bringing the total project budget to $80,945,564. In addition to any additional costs associated to the siting of the SWTS components, future funding requirements will also include: construction of the additional water quality enhancements required by DERM (Approx. $10M- $15M); and construction costs for upsized stormwater piping resulting from the change of stormwater criteria from a 5-year to a 10-year design storm event (Approx. $3M). Auxiliary Power Generators At the September 13, 2017 commission meeting, it was resolved that all new SWTS would require auxiliary power generators. As a result, a change order was issued to the Design/Builder team to include the installation of nine (9) generators at the existing and proposed SWTS, Page 30 of 370 located at the street-ends of 5th Street, 6th Street, 10th Street, 14th Street, Bay Road and at the new SWTS proposed for Lincoln Road. On October 14th, 2020, the City Commission passed a resolution implementing auxiliary power generators for SWTS on a case-by-case basis. FP&L has introduced a new program that provides an independent and redundant electrical service system for critical infrastructure, including SWTS. This program could potentially reduce some of the concerns regarding power outages and the operation of the SWTS. The City Administration is prepared to recommend excluding auxiliary power generators from the West Avenue Project contingent on evaluation of the electrical reliability data that will be provided by FP&L. If generators were to be excluded from this project, it could result in a savings of approximately$4.5 million. Next Steps Once a determination is made regarding the siting of the SWTS, City staff will issue a directive to the Design/Builder to submit a proposal for the re-design and construction of the revised SWTS. A change order will be presented at the December 2020 Commission Meeting. Upon execution of the change order, the Design/Builder will revise the plans and submit to the agencies for permitting. The construction activities could commence as early as Fall 2021 , provided permits are obtained and all necessary harmonization agreements have been executed. Proceeding with options other than Option 2 may delay the start of construction. CONCLUSION After careful consideration of the Design/Builder's recommendation, the level of community engagement and the feedback received, the Administration recommends adopting the Resolution and proceeding with Option 2 as the recommended site for the stormwater treatment system location. Applicable Area South Beach Is this a "Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O. to Know" item, pursuant to Bond Funds? City Code Section 2-14? Yes No Strategic Connection Neighborhoods - Enhance the beautification, physical appearance and cleanliness of neighborhoods. Legislative Tracking Capital Improvement Projects ATTACHMENTS: Description o Summary of Options (Attachment 1) ❑ West Ave PH2 Public Comment Tracker (Exhitbit A) o Accelerated Feasibility Study (Exhibit B) Page 31 of 370 ❑ Lincoln Rd SWTS Location Concepts (Exhibit C) ❑ Reso - West Ave Option 2 Recommendation Page 32 of 370 ATTACHMENT 1 Stormwater Treatment System at Lincoln Road, Summary of Options Underground 10-Year Emergency nli Costruction me Option Location Component LocationGenerator Location FPL Vault Location Control Pane(s)I Location storm Pip., Gravity Cost Impact A To Option 1 Impact(Days) Recommendation Bypass 1 Lincoln Court&Bay Road; Lincoln Rd Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Cl and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd $1,805,000 $0 150 Base SWTS at Lincoln Road Rd Rd 2 Control Panels at Lincoln Lincoln Rd 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd / I $2.620,000 $815,000 150 Highly Preferred Road;All else at 1671 3 SWTS and at to 1671 d Qtis1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave I X 54,296,000 52,491,000 360 Preferre Dfsch •a at Lincoln Road SWTS and EQ to 1671; 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave f X 52,875,000 S1.070,000 325 Preferred Discharge at 17th 4 5-year Storm/10-year Piping Lincoln Rd Lincoln Rd End Lincoln Rd End Lincoln Rd End I I ($2,632.876) (54.437,876) 90 Not Recommended 4A 5-year Storm/10-year Piping Lincoln Rd Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Cl and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd I f $2,028,900 $223,900 180 Not Recommended &Structures RD Rd 2 SWTS i Lincoln Rood I.Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Cl and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay 5 Rood Rd RD Rd Lincoln Cl and Bay Rd i I $2.129,076 $324,076 360 Not Recommended 6 •WTS at Lincoln;AN EQ at 1671 Lincoln Rd 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave se I S1.857.000 552,000 150 Preferred 7 Upgrade 6".10",14"51SWT$; 6th.10th,l4th, 6th,i h,l4th,lincoln 6th101h,14th, 6th,lOth,l4th,Lincoln I I ($87,000) ($1,892,000) 480 Not Recommended Downgrade Lincoln SWTS Lincoln Lincoln 8 Eliminate Gen Set SWTS and Lincoln Rd N/A Lincoln Ct and Bay Liiu*i Cl and Bay Rd 1 I 5468,537 (51,336,463) 150 Not Recommended EQ at Lincoln Rd 9 SWTS at Lincoln Rd Al EQ at Lincoln Rd 1625 West Ave 1625 West Ave 1625 West Ave I I S1.810.000 55.000 150 Preferred 1625 10 Above Ground EQ Lincoln Rd G Hotel eri Hotel Ga herin Gaylhering Hotels 9 Hotel I ./ 53 200.000 51,395,000 Min 420 Not Recommended Engineering & Construction Perspective: Base: D/B Team Recommended Highly Preferred Recommendation Preferred Recommendation Not Recommended Page 33 of 370 Exhibit A WEST AVENUE INQUIRIES FROM INFORMATION VIDEO OUT 10/12/2020 Type (Question/Comment) Stakeholder name Date of Inquiry Question/Comment Response Provided Mtg took place on 10/16,discussed storm water treatment system options/feedback. WAVNA wants to meet with team to discuss project and items in the presentation in detail Follow up meeting requested to discuss harmonization with Public Works city engineering Mtg req. WAVNA week of 10/5 prior to the October 28 special commission meeting,after the informative video comes out team present. Provided link to project page on city's website,which includes overall project details.Also provided information on upcoming October 28 meeting and materials that have been posted to review prior to the meeting.There is not a current anticipated start of construction at this Requesting additional information on project and schedule,in particular on West Avenue time because that depends on the decisions in progress(i.e.where the components of the Question Camilo Franco 10/6/2020 and 14 Street. storm water management system is placed). West Avenue and 8 Street intersection is definitely part of the project.There will be improvements to the infrastructure underneath the road,and raising the elevation to assist Reminder to please include drainage and roadway improvements at West Avenue and 8 with flooding in this area.We know this is a hot spot for water collection when it rains Comment Monique del Rio 10/12/2020 Street as part of the project. heavy,especially during high tide times. Ms.Durant watched the online presentation and had concerns regarding Option#1 and Conference call conducted on October 16,2020 with team to answer questions regarding potential impacts on interested property.Requesting a follow-up call to clarify Options#1 the options.Follow up email was sent providing area and city-wide studies performed that Question Vanessa Durant 10/13/2020 and#2. included evaluation of potential impacts/benefits to resilience program and property values. Excellent presentation.Requested pictures of the size of the components for the proposed components be placed on Lincoln Road median concept as done with concept at 1671 West Avenue.Mentioned being happy with the Sunset Harbour cover-- "it look beautiful and Comment Sara de los Reyes 10/13/2020 have received many complements no negative comments yet." N/A Video posted and included as part of WAvNA newsletter,database includes 1600 people, Thank you for distributing the information and also shared lane closure information for Comment Gayle Durham 10/13/2020 encouraging them to view the video before the October 28 Zoom meeting. upcoming 1-395 closure. I think the option for pump on Lincoln Rd is better although it will remove parking spaces and residents there oppose it,i think by going with option 2 on West Avenue the City will be greatly affecting the lots\'potential development use for future development,if a pump Comment Daniel 10/13/2020 station goes there. N/A Provided harmonization plan sheet for reference to coordinate the paving within the Requested information for work being done in front of 1605 Bay Road,including roadway property scheduled for later this month.Offered to meet with board members to further elevation,as there is work being planned within private property.Also requested discuss harmonization efforts.Asked building contact if there were any plans showing the confirmation as to whether the property is already tied to the city's stormwater system. property's existing drainage to see if team could determine whether property is connected Question Mtg req. Betsy Morales 10/14/2020 Follow up meeting with team was requested 10/19. to city's system. As private residential property owners we are appreciative of the city's efforts at flood control&its communication w/residents. However,we have concerns about the harmonization component of the West Ave project.We have spent considerable resources (time&$1 improving the landscape on&in front of our property during the last decade. In the swale all along 14th Terrace,&@ our own expense,&w/city permission,we have planted Palms,which we hope can be saved&incorporated into the new landscape design. Project team needs final harmonization policy in order to discuss details with resident. We replaced the lawn in front of our home w/a variety of native plants&flowers that we hope will not be disrupted. We replaced our broken old concrete driveway w/pea gravel. If these elements are disturbed during harmonization,we hope the city will see fit to reimburse us the cost of necessary repairs/replacements. Can this issue be addressed? Question Michael Faubion 10/14/2020 The water treatment system is all encompassing-so both the below ground and above Is the WTS system below ground or above ground in option 6 or 9?Thank u. ground components are all a part of the whole system.In options 6 and 9,the below ground components would be under the road(underground)on the west end of Lincoln Road and Question Blain Tucker 10/15/2020 the above ground components would be in parking lots on West Avenue. Page 34 of 370 Exhibit A Hi Wanda, Thanks for your inquiry.Not best engineering practice means that for various reasons(based on research,practice,facts proven over time,experience and reasonable judgement)-this is NOT the choice that the engineers working the West Avenue Enhancements recommend for installation.Good Engineering Practice(GEP)is engineering and technical activities that ensures the engineering,operating,safety measures or maintenance activities are based on established codes,standards,published technical reports,or recommended practices. In the case of West Avenue examples,option 2 critical components are in close proximity to each other.This provides a direct line of sight from the underground components of the storm water treatment system to the above ground electrical panel controls-this is a safety feature for the operations and maintenance of the system that is hard to replicate.In On Option#6 and#9,what does it mean"not best engineering practice". At this time,I am options 6 and 9,the above ground component(control panels)are further away and remove not for Option#2.#6 and#9 preferred. line of sight;this therefore makes them NOT the best engineering practice for the safety and functionality of the system.Moreover,IF options 6 or 9 are chosen,since the control panel is placed farther away,the engineering standards will require the installation of a"kill switch"(if you will)for safety purposes in close proximity to the below ground components on the Lincoln Road west end.This would be a 10x12 smaller utility box installed in the Lincoln Road west end vicinity. I hope this information provides clarification for you.Please let us know if you have further questions. Thanks! Question Wanda Tucker 10/15/2020 Thank you for posting this information in advance of the meeting.Is there a slide that illustrates the actual underground design of the 147 acres of piping that feeds into the one WTS site being proposed(&if utilizing any existing drain pipes and smaller WTS at alt sites)? Why can't the recommended option be combined with the upgrading of the other sites that would allow for redundancy and failover system considering that we may outgrow this one solution in another 10-20 years? Lastly,is there a slide that places the old"Base"option side by side with the new"highly Question Mark Wohl 10/17/2020 recommended"solution to compare the 2 sizes(SOW)? Project team offered meeting to discuss technical details. With the chart reference,I think you are referring to the summary of options matrix in the presentation and also in the video.Many of the terms are spoken in the video and we can Why is this document not more user friendly? elaborate more on October 28.In the presentation,the team used abbreviations to make the information fit—apologies if some of this is new to you.Here are the answers to the What does WTS signify? items you asked about: What is Ground EQ? What is DPW? •What does WTS signify? Water/Stormwater Treatment System.This is the all encompassing system with various components above and below ground. What is RMCF/CES? •®/hat is Ground EQ?Above ground/below ground equipment •®/hat is DPW?Department of Public Works •iihat is RMCF/CES?Ric Man Construction Florida,Inc./CES Consultants(your Question Gayle Durham 10/19/2020 contractor/engineer of record Design-Build Team for West Avenue Enhancements) Requesting information on stormwater master plan and other locations identified for pump stations,including a potential covenent preventing additional equipment constructed on Lincoln Road.Requesting additional explanation on the option that would install the outfall at the north end of Bay Road.Requesting a harmonization policy discussion with Public Question Stephan Ginez 10/19/2020 Works staff and a copy of the latest harmonization policy. Email sent to team for additional information. Page 35 of 370 Exhibit B CITY OF MIAMI BEACH WEST AVENUE STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM RELOCATION LIMITED AND ACCELERATED FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II Prepared for MIA/VbACH City of Miami Beach Public Works Department, Engineering Division 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 OCTOBER 2020 II By: CES CONSULTANTS, INC. 0 e , 880 SW 145th Avenue Suite 106 coISJl?AHTS Pembroke Pines, FL 33027 (954)-613-4553 F Prepared By: ', .. Jose A. Caraballo, P.E. FL PE #73064 CON?Ft,INC. lei MfAM Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Storm Water Treatment System Components 1 1.2 Technical Components Investigated 6 2.0 Option 1: Bay Road and Lincoln Court—Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road End 6 2.1 Benefits 7 2.2 Negative Issues 8 3.0 Option 2: Move Generator and FPL Electrical Vault to 1671 West Avenue—Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road End with Above Ground Control Platform between Bay Road and Lincoln Court 9 3.1 Benefits 10 3.2 Negative Issues 11 4.0 Option 3: Relocate the Storm Water Treatment System and all above ground equipment to 1671 West Avenue (Post Office) 11 4.1 Benefits 12 4.2 Negative Issues 13 5.0 Option 4: Revert to Five-Year Storm Criteria—Install 10-Year Sized Piping(below ground)for Eventual 10-Year SWTS Upgrade.Add SWTS Capacity at a Future Date. 13 5.1 Benefits 14 a. We did not identify any benefits which will differentiate this option from option 1 other than a temporary reduction in cost. 14 5.2 Negative Issues 14 6.0 Option 4A: Revert to Five-Year Storm Criteria—Install 10-Year Sized Piping and Storm Water Treatment System (below ground) and 5-Year pumps and Above Ground Electrical for Eventual 10-Year SWTS Upgrade (10-Year Footprint). Increase Pumping Capacity at a Future Date. 15 6.1 Benefits 16 6.2 Negative Issues 16 7.0 Option 5: Split the Storm Water Treatment System into two (2) 60,000 GPM Units 17 7.1 Benefits 17 Below is a list of benefits with option 5 compared to option 1. 17 7.2 Negative Issues 17 Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page ii of iv October 2020 Page 37 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS 8.0 Option 6: Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road—All Above Ground Components to 1671 West Avenue 18 8.1 Benefits 18 8.2 Negative Issues 19 9.0 Option 7: Upgrade Existing Storm Water Treatment Systems at 6th Street and Split Flows N&S at 14th Street 19 9.1 Benefits 20 9.2 Negative Issues 21 10.0 Option 8: Eliminate Permanent Emergency Generator from Lincoln Road and Other Locations 21 10.1 Benefits 22 Below is a list of benefits with option 8 compared to option 1. 22 10.2 Negative Issues 22 11.0 Option 9: Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road—All Above Ground Components to 1625 West Avenue (Circular Parking Lot) 23 11.1 Benefits 23 11.2 Negative Issues 24 Appendices Appendix A: Option 1 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix B: Option 2 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix C: Option 3 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix D: Option 4 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix E: Option 4A Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix F: Option 5 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix G: Option 6 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix H: Option 7 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix I: Option 8 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Appendix J: Option 9 Plans, Flooding Map, and Hydraulic Grade line Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page iii of iv October 2020 Page 38 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page iv of iv October 2020 Page 39 of 370 Exhibit B cis CONSULTANTS 1.0 Introduction The City of Miami Beach (CMB) is in the process of implementing a substantial program to improve flood protection and reduce existing flooding conditions south of Dade Boulevard.A critical component of the project is the effective method of relocation of the stormwater in the West Avenue basin. This basin extends from 6th Street to Dade Boulevard and from Alton Road west to Biscayne Bay. This portion of the project is of extreme importance because it is the discharge area not just for the West Avenue basin, but for approximately 400 acres east of this basin. The purpose of this feasibility study is to identify, validate, and compare various options for the final location of the project's Storm Water Treatment System and all associated above ground components. Although the report is a feasibility study, every option will be studied to assure that each option will provide CMB with the desired outcome of managing the rainfall generated from a 10-year theoretical storm event. Once an option is determined to meet the criteria required to manage a 10-year theoretical storm event, the report will identify issues and benefits that may impact CMB and its residents. These issues are obstruction of view, loss of parking (restricted resident parking and public metered parking), additional facilities requiring installation, impact to right-of-way corridor for future utility expansion. The following two sections will provide a brief description of each physical component of a Storm Water Treatment System, and a description of each technical component analyzed to confirm that the option is feasible and to determine each options positive and negative impacts to the project and residents. 1.1 Storm Water Treatment System Components In order to discuss the 11 options defined in this feasibility study, it is important to understand each component of a Storm Water Treatment System,what each component does, and how could it impact the community. A Storm Water Treatment System is a mechanical system to accelerate the relocation or discharge of stormwater. In the case of the West Avenue project, the Storm Water Treatment System will assist in mechanically moving a large volume of water into Biscayne Bay where it would otherwise cause severe flooding to the project area. The simplest way to analyze this Storm Water Treatment System is to divide it into above ground and below ground components. The above ground components are all related to power supply and controlling the Storm Water Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 1 of 24 October 2020 Page 40 of 370 Exhibit B C-B9 CONSULTANTS Treatment System. The below ground components mechanically separate contaminant material from the stormwater, provide short term storage of the stormwater, and mechanically force the collected and treated stormwater into Biscayne Bay. Below Ground Components The below ground components include inflow piping, water quality wells, a trash rack, a filtration system, a wet well with submersible pumps, and force mains with a dissipator structure. Each one of these components will be constructed in its entirety below ground, with only access hatches visible. These access hatches will be flush with the ground They are rated to withstand heavy loads, such as that from a large truck, and they have built- in locking mechanisms to avoid unauthorized access. Since all of these components are below ground,they do not cause a visible obstruction to the residents of the West Avenue project area. Additionally, they are not audibly noticeable unless they are operating, which only occurs during a significant rain event. During a short shower or light rain, the stormwater will be stored in the collection pipes, and the disposal mechanism will be through the expected 15 drainage wells that are designed throughout the project area. Inflow Piping The inflow piping is the portion of the collection system that connects to the Storm Water Treatment System.As the stormwater lands on the roadway,the rain flows into a drainage inlet. Below the ground,there is a network of collection structures and pipes that collect all the stormwater and convey it towards the Storm Water Treatment System. The network of structures and pipes designed for this project have been sized to collect and convey the amount of stormwater generated in a 10-year theoretical storm event. Water Quality Wells The portion of stormwater that carries harmful contaminants is the first flush.This is the initial stormwater (first flush)that washes contaminants, such as brake dust and oils, into the stormwater system. In order to treat the contaminated stormwater, we will divert the first flush towards a series of water quality wells. These wells allow for the settling of solids particles and the separation of oils from Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 2 of 24 October 2020 Page 41 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS the stormwater. Once the solid particles and oils are separated from the stormwater,the treated stormwater will be pumped into the groundwater system for a final natural attenuation.The entire well system is below ground and will not be visible to the public. Trash Rack Once the stormwater enters the Storm Water Treatment System facility, it will first pass through a trash rack. Anything that may have entered the drainage system that is larger than 3.5 inches will be captured in the trash rack. The trash rack requires periodic cleaning. The amount of cleaning depends on the season, but it does not occur more than once every couple of months. The importance of the trash rack is to help maintain a clean discharge into Biscayne Bay, and to protect the pumps from large objects that can cause damage to the equipment. Filtration System The stormwater next enters the filtration system. The stormwater will pass through a mesh screen, which captures particles up to 120 microns, or as small as a grain of sand. The filtration system requires periodic cleaning. The amount of cleaning depends on the season, but it does not occur more than once every couple of months. The importance of the filtration system is to help maintain a clean discharge into Biscayne Bay, and to protect the pumps from possible damage. This filtration system is just one component of the overall water quality system designed for this project. Wet Well with Submersible Pumps The stormwater next enters the wet well. This is where the pumping system is located. When operational, the submersible pumps will transfer the stormwater from the wet well into Biscayne Bay via a dissipator. Each pump is designed to mechanically move up to 20,000 gallons of stormwater per minute. This Storm Water Treatment System has 6 pumps for a total of 120,000 gallons per minute. These pumps do have variable speed drives to deliver the needed output while saving energy. The wet well measures approximately 33 feet x 16.67 feet and 27 Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 3 of 24 October 2020 Page 42 of 370 Exhibit B DOG CONSULTANTS feet deep. The dimensions of the wet well are critical for the operation of the station. The volume of the wet well allows for sufficient stormwater to enter the facility and allows for an efficient operation of each pump. Force Main with Dissipator Structure The submersible pumps force the stormwater through pipes into the dissipator. The dissipator is located below the cap of the seawall and is designed to be part of the seawall. The purpose of the dissipator is to reduce the velocity of the pumped stormwater in order to avoid scouring the sea floor of Biscayne Bay, a necessary environmental assurance. Above Ground Components The above ground components are all related to powering and controlling the Storm Water Treatment System. The above ground components include an electrical panel platform, an emergency generator, and an FPL electrical vault. Due to the size of this project, all these components have a significant footprint and height. Electrical Panel Platform The electrical panel platform is the nerve center to the Storm Water Treatment System. This platform houses all the electrical and communications equipment. This equipment provides power to the pumps, but it also is programmed to direct which pump to turn on and off, and to operate at desired speeds to produce only the necessary output while saving energy. This is key to proper operation of the station. Most of the time, only one or a couple of pumps will be operating at any given time.The controls will decide which to turn on and when.This reduces wear and tear on the pumps, and it controls the amount of discharge that enters Biscayne Bay at any one time. Due to safety code requirements, each piece of equipment located on the electrical panel platform needs to have a safe working area. This factor drives the actual size required for the platform. The current electrical panel platform configuration requires 30.5 feet x 20.5 feet of area. Additionally, due to FEMA flood zone maps and Florida Building Code requirements, the base of the electrical panel platform cannot be lower than Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 4 of 24 October 2020 Page 43 of 370 Exhibit B cis COMSOITANTS elevation 8.44 NAVD,which is approximately 4.5 feet above the surface of the new roadway.The equipment height is approximately 7 feet for a total height from the proposed roadway of 11.5 feet or 15.44 NAVD. Emergency Generator The emergency generator is an extremely important component to the above ground equipment. The emergency generator will be able to power the entire Storm Water Treatment System in the event that there is a loss of power in the area. This is extremely important because the power typically goes out during a theoretical storm event, which is exactly when the neighborhood will need the Storm Water Treatment System. Additionally, power usually is not restored immediately. The emergency generator will make sure that the station is operating to its full capacity. This operation is critical for preservation of private property and first responder access. The generator required to power this station is 34 feet x 14 feet. FEMA flood zone maps and Florida Building Code requirements, the base of the emergency generator cannot be lower than elevation 8.44 NAVD. Since the emergency generator sits on its fuel tank,we were able to lower the generator pad to 5.69 NAVD. The generator 14 feet. The emergency generator height is approximately 14 feet for a total height from the proposed roadway of 15.2 feet or 19.70 NAVD. It is important to note that the generator selected for this project operates with a 50/50 fuel mixture of natural gas and diesel fuel. This helps the generator run efficiently and reduces harmful environmental emissions, and operates at the highest available noise reduction rating of 40 Db. FPL Electrical Vault The FPL electrical vault is essential to provide uninterrupted power to the Storm Water Treatment System. Due to requirements established between FPL and CMB, FPL is required to provide dedicated and redundant power to each Storm Water Treatment System constructed by CMB.This requirement does increase the size of the FPL electrical vault, but it also provides reliable power to an important City asset. The FPL vault houses the transformers required to properly power the station. Under the current configuration, the FPL Electrical Vault 35.33 feet by Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 5 of 24 October 2020 Page 44 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS 21.33 feet. The FPL vault will sit flush with the proposed roadway, but the roof of the structure will 13.83 feet above the proposed roadway, or 18.33 NAVD. 1.2 Technical Components Investigated The effort placed into this feasibility study was to identify additional potential locations, to determine if it is possible to relocate the Storm Water Treatment System, and what kind of impact will it have on the project and the community. In order to determine if an option is feasible, we verified that it meets the minimum requirements of the project's needs. This includes meeting the 10-year theoretical storm event, potential environmental contamination at each site, and any potential permitting issues, except for options 4 and 4A where the Storm Water Treatment System is reverted back to meeting only a 5-year theoretical storm event. Once it is determined that an option is feasible for relocation, we analyzed the physical impacts to CMB and its residents' day to day lives. These impacts include potential visual impairment, loss of parking, potential impacts to utility corridors within the public right of way, and impacts to operations, maintenance, and safety of CMB public works employees. 2.0 Option 1: Bay Road and Lincoln Court — Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road End Option 1 is based on the Design Criteria Package upgraded to meet a 10-year theoretical storm event. Originally,the project required a stormwater system designed to a five-year theoretical storm event, and the entire Storm Water Treatment System system was located at the western most street end of Lincoln Road.At the request of the Miami Beach Commission, the stormwater system was modeled and redesigned to manage a ten-year theoretical storm event. This required a significant increase in capacity, which subsequently increased the footprint of the entire Storm Water Treatment System. CMB also requested the incorporation of a 1,250 KW emergency generator to the project. The increase in above ground electrical components rendered the original layout obsolete. The median concept was developed to attempt to accommodate the above ground electrical equipment as close to the actual Storm Water Treatment System as possible. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 6 of 24 October 2020 Page 45 of 370 Exhibit B oes CONSULTANTS The configuration of option 1 is to have the entire Storm Water Treatment System (below ground components)at the western most street end of Lincoln Road.This includes a trash rack, filter system, wet well and dissipator, all below ground. The only visible parts to the below ground components are the access hatches, which are flush with the roadway surface. The electrical and control systems will be located in in a median in the middle of Lincoln Road between Bay Road and Lincoln Court. These above ground features include an electrical control panel platform, a stand-by emergency generator, and an FPL vault. These above ground features require an area of approximately 121'x31'. The maximum height of the equipment will be 15 feet above the proposed roadway. In order to protect the equipment from vehicular traffic and vandalism, a screening system has been designed. This screening system will include a barrier wall to prevent vehicles from impacting the screen or the above ground equipment. Additionally, the screen will visibly shield the electrical components from the residents. Appendix A includes plan view and section view drawings of the Storm Water Treatment System and the above ground components. CES has prepared a hydraulic model of the West Avenue project area. The option 1 configuration will manage a ten-year theoretical storm event. FPL has also prepared design plans to provide the necessary power to this station under the option 1 conditions. We have also met with the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department and the City of Miami Beach Fire Department regarding the median concept, and they have both approved the location regarding regulations and required access. This option is a feasible option from an engineering standpoint. It is also the most desirable option due to its improved hydraulics and safer operating conditions for maintenance staff. 2.1 Benefits Option 1 is the base option for this project. We will define some benefits in this section, but it will be used as a comparison to all other options. Below is a list of benefits with Option 1. a. Emergency Overflow piping — Due to the proximity to the Lincoln Road street and sea wall,this option allows for the installation of emergency overflow piping.These pipes will discharge any stormwater that reaches a certain elevation by means of gravity. We feel that this is important because if the station becomes overwhelmed due to power failure or mechanical failure, there is a means to discharge excess stormwater. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 7 of 24 October 2020 Page 46 of 370 Exhibit B cis CONSULTANTS b. Proximity of Electrical Equipment to Storm Water Treatment System—Maintaining a close proximity from the electrical equipment to the actual Storm Water Treatment System (approximately 200 feet) improves operator safety. By maintaining a line of sight from the electrical equipment to the Storm Water Treatment System, the maintenance crew can communicate without communication devices and can maintain sight on each other. By maintaining line of sight, the City can utilize a two or three employee maintenance crew, which reduces annual operating cost. c. Promenade Atmosphere/Traffic Calming—The median will include screening and canopy cover to promote a disincentive to traffic (calming effect) and create a promenade type atmosphere with flush sidewalks and roadway pavers in addition to new amenities at the street end. 2.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that Option 1 is a feasible layout,there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with Option 1. a. Resident Displeasure — Many residents near the location of the median concept have expressed disagreement with the above ground components. They do not necessarily have an issue with the below ground features located at the street end. Many residents have agreed that the project is a benefit, but they do not want the above ground features to be located in the median between Bay Road and Lincoln Court. b. Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking — The installation of the median concept causes a loss of on-street restricted resident parking at two (2) locations. First, there will be a loss of 17 on-street restricted resident parking spaces along Lincoln Road between Bay Road and Lincoln Court due to the width required to accommodate the median concept. Second, there will be a loss of 9 on-street restricted resident parking spaces along Lincoln Road just east of Bay Road due to a lane shift to accommodate the median concept. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 8 of 24 October 2020 Page 47 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS c. Impact to Delivery Vehicles, Maintenance Vehicles, and Visitors — The presence of the above ground median equipment creates a space restriction between Bay Road and Lincoln Court. The loss of on-street mentioned above will impact these services. d. Perceived Loss of Property Value—The residents immediately surrounding the equipment believe the above ground equipment will impact the value of their property due to the size and nature of the footprint. 3.0 Option 2: Move Generator and FPL Electrical Vault to 1671 West Avenue— Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road End with Above Ground Control Platform between Bay Road and Lincoln Court Option 2 is very similar to option 1. In this configuration, the entire Storm Water Treatment System (below ground components)will be located at the western most street end of Lincoln Road. This includes a trash rack, filtration system, wet well and dissipator. The only visible parts to the below ground components are the access hatches, which are flush with the roadway surface.The electrical control platform will be located in a median in the middle of Lincoln Road between Bay Road and Lincoln Court, and the stand-by emergency generator and FPL electrical vault will be located at the parking lot of 1671 West Avenue. The above ground features in the median of Lincoln Road require an area of approximately 30.5'x45.7' (Layout No. 2: 97'x17.2'). In order to protect the equipment from vehicular traffic and vandalism, a screening system has been designed. This screening system will include a barrier wall to prevent vehicles from impacting the screen or the above ground equipment. The total height of the screening system along Lincoln Road will be 12.5'. The stand-by emergency generator and FPL electrical vault will be located within a public parking lot and will be shielded from sight with a screened fence, and it will be protected from vehicular traffic with bollards. A duct bank measuring approximately 4'x1,000' will be required to connect the Storm Water Treatment System to the stand-by emergency generator. Appendix 2 includes plan view and section view drawings of the Storm Water Treatment System and the above ground components. CES has prepared a hydraulic model of the West Avenue project area. The option 2 configuration will manage a ten-year theoretical storm event. FPL has expressed the ability to provide the necessary power supply to the relocation area of 1671 West Avenue. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 9 of 24 October 2020 Page 48 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS We have also met with the City of Miami Beach Public Works Department and the City of Miami Beach Fire Department regarding the median concept, and they have both approved the location regarding regulations and required access. Finally, we have identified a corridor within the public right-of-way for the duct bank from the electrical platform to the stand-by emergency generator. This option is a feasible option from an engineering standpoint. 3.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with option 2 compared to option 1, however the footprint at the median will be lessened. a. Emergency Overflow piping — Due to the proximity to the Lincoln Road street and sea wall,this option allows for the installation of emergency overflow piping.These pipes will discharge any stormwater that reaches a certain elevation by means of gravity. We feel that this is important because if the station becomes overwhelmed due to power failure or mechanical failure, there is a means to discharge excess stormwater. b. Proximity of Electrical Control Platform to Storm Water Treatment System — Maintaining a close proximity from the electrical control platform to the actual Storm Water Treatment System (approximately 200 feet) improves operator safety. By maintaining a line of sight from the electrical equipment to the Storm Water Treatment System, the maintenance crew can communicate without communication devices and can maintain sight on each other. By maintaining line of sight, the City can utilize a two or three employee maintenance crew, which reduces annual operating cost. c. Promenade Atmosphere/Traffic Calming—The median will include screening and canopy cover to promote a disincentive to traffic (calming effect) and create a promenade type atmosphere with flush sidewalks and roadway pavers in addition to new amenities at the street end. d. Potential Ability to Recapture Additional Parking Spaces — Due to time, this option was investigated with a very conservative perspective, as to not mislead the public. There is a strong possibility that additional parking spaces may be recaptured by optimizing the design, if selected. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 10 of 24 October 2020 Page 49 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS 3.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that Option 2 is a feasible layout,there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with Option 2. a. Resident Displeasure—This option will still require a median concept. As stated in option 1, many residents near the location of the median concept have expressed disagreement with the above ground components. Removing the generator and FPL electrical vault from the median concept will reduce the footprint by 2,024.5 square feet and reduce the overall height by 2.5 feet. b. Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking and Public Metered Parking—As in option 1, the installation of the median concept (even a shorter one) causes a loss of on-street parking at two (2) locations. First, there will be a loss of 10 on-street restricted resident parking spaces along Lincoln Road between Bay Road and Lincoln Court due to the width required to accommodate the median concept. There will also be a loss of approximately 14 public parking spaces at the public parking lot located at 1671 West Avenue. c. Additional Electrical Duct Bank — Moving the generator away from the electrical equipment will require the design and construction of an additional electrical duct bank. This duct bank will need a utility corridor of approximately 4'.A plan view of the duct bank can be found in Appendix B of this report. 4.0 Option 3: Relocate the Storm Water Treatment System and all above ground equipment to 1671 West Avenue (Post Office) The configuration for option 3 is to relocate the entire Storm Water Treatment System (above and below ground components) to the public parking lot located at 1671 West Avenue. This will require several modifications to the current design. The current design has the stormwater flow from west avenue turning west towards the Lincoln Road street end. In option 3 we will direct the flow straight across Lincoln Road or approximately 400'. This should actually benefit the drainage by avoiding a bottle neck in the drainage pipes. This bottle neck was previously addressed by increasing the pipe diameters to 96 inches. The Storm Water Treatment System will then discharge into Biscayne Bay through six (6) Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 11 of 24 October 2020 Page 50 of 370 Exhibit B oes CONSULTANTS 42-inch force mains from the parking lot to the Lincoln Road street end approximately 1,000 feet away. We also looked into discharging into the Dade Canal near the intersection of 17th Street and West Avenue (Option 3A). Although we are confident that we can dissipate the flow to avoid erosion at the discharge point, we cannot determine the impact of 120,000 gallons per minute entering the Dade Canal. Additional time will be required to model the effects of such a large volume of stormwater entering the canal at one time.Appendix 3 includes plan view and section view drawings of the Storm Water Treatment System and the above ground components. 4.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with Option 3 compared to Option 1. a. Resident Satisfaction — We have participated in many resident meetings, and it seems that there is a great displeasure with the above ground components. This option will satisfy the requests from the residents of Lincoln Road. It is important to note that this option will still require a much smaller, but still significant, electrical disconnect platform, and a repeater box for the signal at the end of Lincoln Road. The repeater box will be approximately 4 feet by 4 feet and 6 feet tall. The electrical disconnect platform will be approximately 20 feet by 25 feet. This will be placed near the sea wall. b. No Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking—Since this option does not require any electrical equipment within the median of Lincoln Road, there will be no impact to the existing restricted resident parking. The project will still require for the roadway to be raised and for harmonization to occur at the private property, but the parking will be returned with new pavement markings. It is important to note that there are claims that the Storm Water Treatment System is eliminating 7 private parking spaces currently located on the north end of the Lincoln Road street end.This is not factual.These parking spaces are not within private property are in fact not private parking spaces. As per direction from CMB, these parking spaces will be eliminated regardless of the location of the Storm Water Treatment System. c. Park Like Amenities—It is possible to beautify the street end with added green space. We have looked into creating a small island greenspace with park benches at the street end. This additional green space, in conjunction with the concrete pavers and flush sidewalks along Lincoln Court, provides a connectivity between the Lincoln Road street end and the Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 12 of 24 October 2020 Page 51 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS Lincoln Court Pedestrian Bridge. 4.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that option 3 is a feasible layout,there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with option 3 and 3A. a. Loss of Emergency Overflow Piping — Our original design has emergency overflow pipes that allow discharge via gravity in the event that the station becomes overwhelmed due to electrical or mechanical failure. Moving the underground components approximately 1,000 feet away from the sea wall makes it impossible to install these gravity overflow pipes and have them operate as intended. Therefore, in a catastrophic power loss (including the emergency generator)the Storm Water Treatment System will be crippled. Flood waters will flow into the streets in lieu of direct discharge to the bay or canal. b. Loss of Public Parking — Utilizing the parking lot will cause the loss of 31 parking spaces from the public lot. The loss of spaces due to the above ground components will be approximately 19 stalls. The below ground components will also take up an additional 12 parking stalls due to the access hatches. The hatches can withstand the weight of a vehicle, but in the event of an emergency or routine maintenance, if a vehicle is parked on a hatch, it will need to be moved or towed. Due to time, this option was investigated with a very conservative perspective, as to not mislead the public. There is a strong possibility that the parking space loss can be reduced from 31 to 28 with design optimization. c. Extended Construction Time — The wide corridor required to install the discharge pipes from the Storm Water Treatment System to the sea wall at Lincoln Road will require extensive utility relocations.This will not only cause delays to the project, but it may cause longer construction time to complete the installation. 5.0 Option 4: Revert to Five-Year Storm Criteria — Install 10-Year Sized Piping (below ground) for Eventual 10-Year SWTS Upgrade. Add SWTS Capacity at a Future Date. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 13 of 24 October 2020 Page 52 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS The configuration for Option 4 is to install the collection piping for a 10-year theoretical storm event, but construct a Storm Water Treatment System at the Lincoln Road street end that will handle a 5-year theoretical storm event.The Storm Water Treatment System will be designed in a modular layout to allow for upgrading at a future date. The Storm Water Treatment System will have a full-sized trash rack, but one filter system measuring approximately 20 feet by 13 feet, and a 3-pump wet well measuring approximately 19 feet by 22 feet. A 3-Storm Water Treatment System will require significantly reduce the size of the above ground electrical equipment, which will allow for all above ground components to be located near the Lincoln Road sea wall. This option will reduce the footprint of all of the above ground electrical components by 2,411.48 square feet. It is important to note that because of the FEMA Flood zone and the Florida Building Code requirements, the overall height of the above ground components should not vary significantly. It is important to note that this option goes against CMB Commission Resolution No. R7-F dated December 12,2018. This resolution requested an analysis and subsequent design of a stormwater system for a 10-year theoretical storm event. Appendix 4 includes plan view and section view drawings of the Storm Water Treatment System and the above ground components. 5.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with option 4 compared to option 1. a. We did not identify any benefits which will differentiate this option from option 1 other than a temporary reduction in cost. 5.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that Option 4 is a feasible layout,there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with Option 4. a. Violation of Commission Resolution No. R7-F— Under this configuration, it does not meet the management of a 10-year theoretical storm event. b. Additional Major Construction Activities in the Future —This option simply buys time for the inevitable upgrade to the 10-Year storm design. This option will have a reduced Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 14 of 24 October 2020 Page 53 of 370 Exhibit B us CONSULTANTS construction cost impact because of the smaller generator, less pumps, and less electrical panels. These are all items that will eventually require upgrades to meet the CMB Commission request to meet the 10-Year theoretical storm event. c. Eventual Above Ground Equipment Space Issue —This option will satisfy the residents in the immediate future, but the upgrade to the 10-Year storm will cause serious issues.The proposed location of the above ground electrical equipment to manage a 5-year storm will not be sufficient to fit the equipment needed to manage the 10-year storm. The upgrades will require a new location for all of the above ground equipment, and we are back to the exact reason for this feasibility study. d. Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking and Public Metered Parking —This option will cause a loss of restricted resident parking at the street end of Lincoln Road of approximately 16 parking spaces. 6.0 Option 4A: Revert to Five-Year Storm Criteria — Install 10-Year Sized Piping and Storm Water Treatment System (below ground) and 5-Year pumps and Above Ground Electrical for Eventual 10-Year SWTS Upgrade (10-Year Footprint). Increase Pumping Capacity at a Future Date. The configuration for option 4A is to install the collection piping for a 10-year theoretical storm event, and install all the below ground structures required to manage a 10-year theoretical storm event, but we will install only 3 pumps. It is important to note that because of the FEMA Flood zone and the Florida Building Code requirements, the overall height of the above ground components should not vary significantly. This option will require installing all of the major below ground components, and will not require significant construction to upgrade the Storm Water Treatment System from a 5-year storm to a 10-year storm. It is important to note that this option goes against CMB Commission Resolution No. R7-F dated December 12,2018. This resolution requested an analysis and subsequent design of a storm water system for a 10-year theoretical storm event. Appendix 5 includes plan view and section view drawings of the Storm Water Treatment System and the above ground components. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 15 of 24 October 2020 Page 54 of 370 Exhibit B Ns CONSULTANTS 6.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with Option 4A compared to Option 1. a. Emergency Overflow piping — Due to the proximity to the Lincoln Road street and sea wall, this option allows for the installation of emergency overflow piping.These pipes will discharge any stormwater that reaches a certain elevation by means of gravity. We feel that this is important because if the station becomes overwhelmed due to power failure or mechanical failure, there is a means to discharge excess stormwater. b. Proximity of Electrical Equipment to Storm Water Treatment System—Maintaining a close proximity from the electrical equipment to the actual Storm Water Treatment System (approximately 200 feet) improves operator safety. By maintaining a line of sight from the electrical equipment to the Storm Water Treatment System, the maintenance crew can communicate without communication devices and can maintain sight on each other. By maintaining line of sight, the City can utilize a two or three employee maintenance crew, which reduces annual operating cost. c. Promenade Atmosphere/Traffic Calming—The median will include screening and canopy cover to promote a disincentive to traffic(calming effect) and create a promenade type atmosphere with flush sidewalks and roadway pavers in addition to new amenities at the street end. d. We did not identify any benefits which will differentiate this option from option 1 other than a temporary reduction in cost. 6.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that Option 4A is a feasible layout, there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with Option 4A. a. Violation of Commission Resolution No. R7-F—Under this configuration, it does not meet the management of a 10-year theoretical storm event. b. Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking and Public Metered Parking—This option Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 16 of 24 October 2020 Page 55 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS will cause a loss of restricted resident parking at the street end of Lincoln Road of approximately 26 parking spaces. c. Reduced Pumping Capacity—This option will provide the pumping capacity to manage a 5-Year theoretical storm event, but will have all the physical features of a 10-Year theoretical storm event. 7.0 Option 5: Split the Storm Water Treatment System into two (2) 60,000 GPM Units The configuration for option 5 is to install a 3-pump 60,000 GPM Storm Water Treatment System at the west end of Lincoln Road and a 3-pump 60,000 GPM Storm Water Treatment System at the north end of Bay Road. Each Storm Water Treatment System will have all its above ground components at its respective street end. The systems will be interconnected, but piping will be adjusted to direct the flow of the stormwater towards both stations. This option may eliminate the need to install a 96-inch drainage pipe. Our hydraulic model also reflects an improvement in the drainage capacity.This may be due to the removal of the bottleneck at the intersection of Lincoln Road and Bay Road. Appendix 6 includes plan view and section view drawings of the Storm Water Treatment System and the above ground components. 7.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with option 5 compared to option 1. a. Redundancy—This option will provide redundancy to the stormwater system. In the event that one station rendered inoperable, the second station can still provide a 5-year level of service. Inoperable can include damage, loss of power or some sort of maintenance. 7.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that option 5 is a feasible layout, there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with option 5. a. Available Space—Although each station has a smaller footprint above and below ground, Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 17 of 24 October 2020 Page 56 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS the available area for the above ground components is limited. The above ground equipment will take up much of the right of way at the end of Bay Road.The above ground equipment at the end of Lincoln Road will create an obstruction to views of the Bay. b. Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking and Public Metered Parking—This option will cause a loss of restricted resident parking at the street end of Lincoln Road of approximately 12 parking spaces. c. Obstruction of View—The above ground structures located in various places throughout the Lincoln Rad street end and the Bay Road street end will create visual obstructions. 8.0 Option 6: Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road — All Above Ground Components to 1671 West Avenue The configuration for option 6 is to design and install all below ground components for a Storm Water Treatment System that will manage a 10-year theoretical storm event at the west street end of Lincoln Road. All of the above ground components will be installed within the parking lot located at 1671 West Avenue. In order to accomplish this, two (2) dedicated duct banks will need to be installed. One duct bank will protect the power cables from the pump motors to the control panel. The second duct bank will protect the communication controls for the Storm Water Treatment System. It is important to note that this option will create maintenance issues. Due to the long distance between the Storm Water Treatment System underground components and the above ground electrical and communication components, the maintenance crew will require additional safety training, and the maintenance crew will require more employees. Additionally, pump disconnect panels will be required near the below ground components to increase safety during maintenance operations. 8.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with Option 6 compared to Option 1. a. Resident Satisfaction — We have participated in many resident meetings, and it seems that there is a great displeasure with the above ground components. This option will satisfy the requests from the residents of Lincoln Road. It is important to note that this Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 18 of 24 October 2020 Page 57 of 370 Exhibit B G e 9 CONSULTANTS option will still require a much smaller, but still significant, electrical disconnect platform, and a repeater box for the signal. The repeater box will be approximately 4 feet by 4 feet and 6 feet tall. The electrical disconnect platform will be approximately 12 feet by 6 feet and a total height of 12.5 feet. This will be placed near the sea wall. b. No Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking—Since this option does not require any electrical equipment within the median of Lincoln Road, there will be no impact to the existing restricted resident parking. The project will still require for the roadway to be raised and for harmonization to occur at the private property, but the parking will be returned with new pavement markings. 8.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that option 6 is a feasible layout, there are some major issues with this option. Below is a list of issues with option 6. a. Upgraded Power and Communication Cables—Since the distance from the pumps to the electrical equipment will be approximately 1,200 feet, the power cables may increase in diameter and they will require a junction box near the intersection of West Avenue and Lincoln Road. Additionally, the communication cables will also increase in diameter and material.The communication cables may also need a repeater at the intersection of West Avenue and Lincoln Road in order to maintain proper signal reaction. b. Incorporate Additional Disconnect Switches— Due t the significant distance between the pumps and the electrical control panels, a disconnect switch will be required for each pump at the Lincoln Road street end. This series of six (6) pump disconnect switches will require an elevated platform measuring 12'x6' and a total height of 12.5 feet. c. Loss of Public Parking — Utilizing the parking lot will cause the loss of 19 parking spaces from the public lot. 9.0 Option 7: Upgrade Existing Storm Water Treatment Systems at 6th Street and Split Flows N&S at 14th Street Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 19 of 24 October 2020 Page 58 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS Option 7 is an interesting option and has been considered and explored previously by CMB. This is an option that CES investigated when we were developing the systemwide hydraulic model for the 10-year rainfall theoretical storm event for the entire West Avenue Drainage Basin. This option would promote collecting all of the storm water within the West Avenue Basin, but it would split the direction of the flows. Instead of collecting all of the stormwater from south to north and disposing of it solely at Lincoln Road, we would redistribute the stormwater amongst all of the existing and proposed Storm Water Treatment Systems from 6th Street to Lincoln Road. This would require analysis of each Storm Water Treatment System to determine the specific upgrades and modifications required to make the overall drainage system function appropriately to meet the storm, flooding and environmental goals of CMB. Under this scenario, CES would also design/construct a significantly smaller Storm Water Treatment System at the end of Lincoln Road. CMB did not originally select this option for several reasons. First, the regulatory agencies have issues with the operations and efficiency of existing Storm Water Treatment Systems at 6th Street, 10th Street(2 stations),and 14th Street(2 stations). There was concern that the regulatory agencies may request upgrades above and beyond what would be needed to handle the additional flows. Second, due to the connectivity of the entire stormwater system south of Dade Boulevard, CMB desired the additional stormwater capacity that the larger 120,000 GPM Storm Water Treatment System incorporated into the overall system. Finally, there are two Storm Water Treatment Systems at 10th Street and two Storm Water Treatment Systems at 14th Street. At each location, one of the stations is the property of FDOT. Performing upgrades to these stations may require significant design and permitting discussions with FDOT.This option, although very efficient,will require a redesign of the Lincoln Road Storm Water Treatment System, the entire stormwater collection system, and an analysis and expansion design of 5 existing Storm Water Treatment Systems. When looking at the items that triggered this feasibility study, the Lincoln Road Storm Water Treatment System component of this project will look similar to option 4, with the exception of potentially smaller overall drainage piping in certain locations along West Avenue. 9.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with Option 7 compared to Option 1. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 20 of 24 October 2020 Page 59 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS a. Addressing Regulatory Agency Issues — Addressing the regulatory agency issues may be advantageous on several fronts. First, it would bring the existing Storm Water Treatment Systems into compliance and potentially improve capacity and efficiency. Second, it could build good will with the regulatory agencies for future CMB projects. Finally, it may satisfy some of the residents that believe that the existing Storm Water Treatment Systems are causing negative environmental impact on Biscayne Bay. b. Reduction of Stormwater Collection System Size — This option would potentially reduce the pipe diameters of the currently proposed design. This may equate to a reduced construction cost for the piping component and may positively impact the schedule of the storm/drainage system installation. 9.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that Option 6 is a feasible layout from the engineering and construction standpoint,there are some issues related to this option. Below is a list of issues with Option 7. a. Project Delays — This option may cause significant delays to the construction schedule. CES would need additional time to sufficiently model and complete the additional design and permitting effort required to integrate all West Avenue Storm Water Treatment Systems into a cohesive system. Additionally, this would extend the actual construction time due to multiple Storm Water Treatment Systems being constructed and project phasing. 10.0 Option 8: Eliminate Permanent Emergency Generator from Lincoln Road and Other Locations The configuration for Option 8 is the same as many of the other options and configurations with the exception of eliminating the emergency generator. Eliminating this component of the project will reduce the footprint of all the above ground components by approximately 750 square feet. Although this is a significant savings in project cost and above ground area, CES does not believe that this is a prudent and viable option for both CMB and the community, and this option does not meet the current Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 21 of 24 October 2020 Page 60 of 370 Exhibit B Des CONSULTANTS standard of practice or recommendations of the SE Florida Compact related to Resiliency or Sustainability; and CES does not support this option. The reason for the stormwater system and Storm Water Treatment System is to protect the West Avenue Neighborhood/area from flooding, and flooding usually occurs during a standard/limited theoretical storm event. Many of these same theoretical storm events include/cause loss of power and other related impacts. By eliminating the emergency generator, the Storm Water Treatment System would have no backup power supply and may become inoperable during its most needed time, thus exacerbating the flooding issues. There are also several questions regarding safety, emergency vehicle access from fire and police, and CMB code requirements. 10.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with option 8 compared to option 1. a. CES does not see any current or future benefits or value to the consideration of this option. CES does not believe that this is a prudent and viable option for both CMB and the community, and this option does not meet the current standard of practice or recommendations of the SE Florida Compact related to Resiliency or Sustainability; and CES does not support this option. 10.2 Negative Issues Although we have established that Option 6 is a feasible option and provides a reduced site layout, there are some major issues and considerations with this option. Below is a list of issues related to this Option 8. a. Loss of Emergency Back Up Power—The purpose of the Storm Water Treatment System is to manage the stormwater during a rain event.The electrical power supplied within the CMB and throughout the island is usually very stable, but power and communications can be lost during a theoretical storm event. If the power goes out during a theoretical storm event, the area is left with no stormwater protection other than the emergency overflow pipes designed and operational only with the station located at the end of Lincoln Road. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 22 of 24 October 2020 Page 61 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS 11.0 Option 9: Storm Water Treatment System at Lincoln Road — All Above Ground Components to 1625 West Avenue (Circular Parking Lot) The configuration for Option 9 is similar to that of Option 6. This option will maintain the design and installation of all below ground components for a Storm Water Treatment System that will manage a 10-year rainfall theoretical storm event at the west street end of Lincoln Road. All of the above ground components will be installed within the parking lot located at 1625 West Avenue. In order to accomplish this, two (2) dedicated duct banks would need to be installed from the control panels back to the Storm Water Treatment System. One duct bank will protect the power cables from the pump motors to the control panel. The second duct bank will protect the communication controls for the Storm Water Treatment System. It is important to note that this option may create maintenance issues. Due to the long distance between the Storm Water Treatment System underground components and the above ground electrical and communication components, the maintenance crew will require additional safety training, and the maintenance crew will require more employees. Additionally, pump disconnect panels will be required near the below ground components to increase safety during maintenance operations. 11.1 Benefits Below is a list of benefits with Option 9 compared to Option 1. a. Resident Satisfaction — We have participated in many resident meetings, and it seems that there appears to be great displeasure with various aspects of the above ground components. This option may satisfy the requests from the residents of Lincoln Road and the general community. It is important to note that this option would still require a smaller, but still significant, electrical disconnect and operational platform, and a master communications control box with repeater box for the signal connection and pump monitoring. The repeater box will be approximately 4 feet by 4 feet and 6 feet tall. The electrical disconnect platform could be approximately 12 feet by 6 feet and a total height of 12.5 feet. This will be placed near the sea wall. b. No Loss of On-Street Restricted Resident Parking—Since this option does not require any electrical equipment within the median of Lincoln Road, there will be no impact to the Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 23 of 24 October 2020 Page 62 of 370 Exhibit B C-es CONSULTANTS existing restricted resident parking along Lincoln Road.The project will still require for the roadway to be raised and for harmonization to occur at the private property, but the travel lanes and proposed parking will be returned to the new DCP requirements and cross-section with new pavement markings. 11.2 Negative Issues Although CES has established that Option 9 is a feasible layout from an engineering and construction standpoint, there are some issues and considerations with this option. Below is a list of issues related to Option 9. a. Upgraded Power and Communication Cables—Since the distance from the pumps to the electrical equipment will be approximately 1,200 feet, the power cables may increase in diameter and they may need a junction box near the intersection of West Avenue and Lincoln Road. Additionally, the communication cables will also increase in diameter and material. The communication cables may also need a repeaters at the intersection of West Avenue and Lincoln Road, or along the route, in order to maintain proper signal connection and reaction. b. Incorporate Additional Disconnect Switches— Due t the significant distance between the pumps and the electrical control panels, a disconnect switch will be required for each pump at the Lincoln Road street end. This series of six (6) pump disconnect switches will require an elevated platform measuring 12'x6' and a total height of 12.5 feet. c. Loss of Public Parking — Utilizing the parking lot would potentially cause the loss of 8 parking spaces from the public lot, primarily due to the above ground components. Storm Water Treatment System Relocation Feasibility Study for West Avenue Phase II Improvements Page 24 of 24 October 2020 Page 63 of 370 Exhibit B APPENDIX A OPTION 1: Plans, Artist Renderings, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 64 of 370 Exhibit B E PROPOSED LEGENEV RIP-RAP li' BUPIFD Pli —PROPOSED PROPOffL CUL-DE-SAC BURIED TEL SEAWALL CAP OLN DEWAREFER TO r. BURIED GAS TOP a 5.]D ROADWAY DRAWINGS FOR n..e I DETAILS. PROPOSED TRASH ——— --- BURIED FIRER OPTIC I RACK STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL— o RICH 1-01-war —PROPOSED E INV EL-11.5 DUCT BANKS M CATCH BASIN DISSIPATER 32'ID i(4) 60'ID FRP PROPOSED PROPOSED WRIER BOS EL-14.0 R.O.w.LIMIT (SCWE Fm el-•IY W�7 STRUCTURE OVERFLOW PIPE(4) PUMP STATION YET WELL TREATMENT UNIT TVP) 0 STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE BOS EL-].0 INV EL-1.33 OVERFLOW Bps d_21,5 BOS EL-28.0 ( SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE _ ___—_ —__ _ ___ _____ ____ ::,.f±SSLMP._ _ ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE SCHA - . N 0 TELEPHONE MA NHOLE 32'ID FRP . 0 aa BACK FLOW PREVEN TE R a-, IlIDISCHARGE PIPE(6) J11.1i Y1 RL HYDRANTINV L 1.33 r II FwII _ • ® CABLE Tv COMMUNICATION on BOO L111L-_J L--J d 0 WATER METER BON - ,II MI• _... 1= `-DRAINAGE WELLS 'O I n1 i BM %-8 DRAINAGE PIPE I I. ---- ,II _�_;�! —CCENCRETE W IMF E III I W �— II 1111,ig y e HUPO]ED WET TAP TD I u la to I - PI ,1:I 1: ' i .... Aa t 11' I m5r < '''' E Si NG 12'D.I.WATER I I f •� N.MAINTAIN A MIN. NJ • • Bn OF 6 CLEARANCE FROM ALB .. IASARI TARP SEWER -CMC f --- , 1 V TTP 'ELT- PROPOSED 8' M PIII! II I cos, PROPOSED CAP SEWEIR AND MH •� Ill - .n - AND RESTRAIN A 'ti, a . I J d,..6 "' / Ito / W II J 1- 1 - 60-ID PUMP - - STATIN // V CMERFLow cl 1..(----- /,,/t�� I 1 -- / PROPOSED ELECTRICAL JJJ///// DUCT BANKS 32'FLAP `J EXISTING SANITARY I VALVE(TYP) SEWER MH TO REMAIN ——— —— —— ————— ——————— — —-- --—_ r EAST/NG FPL -PROPOSED 12-WATER MAIN DUCIBANK TO EBISIING GAS LINE REMAIN PROPOSED FINE 70 REMAIN HYDRANT W wATEP EXISRNG SANITARY 1 EXISTING TV BOX ETER BOB(2) UI�W" SEWER TO REMAIN ITO REMAIN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION weoBDB.. OPTION 1 ENG OFREcoRoJpG, ENGINEER OF RECORD I,k Name OPTI_01.11, MIAMIBEACH STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CSS cnrwwACER JIMMYL BURY. DEARER NG NEER.yL nDD u DIRECTOR HOCa..PE IIUYw BY .µ I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT p !'S '( _(MAIL GTTYENGNEER IE18R1111FZ.MLtlE,PE. GNEcBm AA `"IMAs � I T/+W/.T WIIB1ra _ RNCOBERONCORER CP.MMB Bre.,,R.WON PROP6iggQ SF PL RKG ,PPO BY W AN-PUMP STATION + 14 NOTED la I]ATE TEVIION _ mM 10/25/19 s,... ua„IR. OPT1 01 . Exhibit B 1 N I I I LEGEND: BURIED ATT BURIED FPL FPL OUCIBANK - BURIED CAS ! t I TO BE RELOCATED .4. —-- BURIED FIBER OPTIC DRAINAGE CONFLICT CATCH BASINAT \STRUCTURE PROPOSED DOME GOR tl'.�Y 9WEnIn I' \ DRAINAGE MANHOLE \ DRAINAGE INLET R.O.W.OMIT�c - _ _ 0 SA0 NITARY SENER MANHOLE 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 1 1 PROPOSED O TELEPHONE MANHOLE O uNMFA RNID NN ® CABLETV COMMUNICATION BOX ® WATER METER BOX 0a' // PROPOSED ELECTRICAL I / DUCT BANK W CiB.NCONTRCM'AL ANEL r PLATFORM GENERATOR SET COMMUNiCATONS FMERKSTICY EL EESLAB EL.5.89' r LME TO REMAIN LU Wit,,I S J.OD' 20 5.04 \ �p�fr 5.00. I ENCASED IS-E{ SANITARY SEWER _ in d FPL VAULT I,,I -. FG.EL. 0't n + _ 4.0034.00'—— I\.QH LI, o ln tttuus FT-.. I GATE D 34 ri . j -.toI MEDIAN BARRTEh 10'GATE it__ LU ••+ ARCHITECTURAL SCREEN Z I I WOMAN(OL PRL OUCiBAM(-� EXISTING ire-� . - J m IMAM TO RE RELOCATED WATER MAIN TO T I \ 1 BE RELOCATED V CPROPOSED L ELECTRICAL I DUCT BANK I —--—--7 R.O.W.OMIT —AI \ `\ • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11gB5/1001 OPTION 1 �� ENG OF REcAW& .lAe ENOIXEER Of RECORD- . I-,Name.OFTT_D].BN9 i v l t —I STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION a.YMANAOER JIMMY MORALES DESIGN ENGMEERJj� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT n p fi��{i -�,I RRRASO ROY COIfr.PE CRAMBY U� I .MF.R'"W'w 14144 q-0 RwCOMM.CENTLP DP.M... ..L nes PROPIAgDSFTE�VIL a...SNEER NELSON PEREE.YOME.PE. ECKEn R ',A.A.., BFPO.er P.o.. s".,,, . AN-PUMP STATION 'NOTED 'x'""10" NO GATE REVISION ar: Io u a sMN MSW 0171 Ot Exhibit B 1250 KW GENERATOR ARCHITECTURAL GRATE i FPL VAULT f — ARRA TECTURAL CCHIE _ 1 A I BARRIER WALL(TYP.) Ii PROPOSED I VALLEY ROADWAY 21'-1" ROADWAYPVALLEY OSED 0 D V.B.H' CUTTER GUTDN 0 Elr.BLH' 90EWALA L _----- ' 0 1'-T tl ,. .__ __-__Il 90EWKK R.O.W 1T'-0" S'-11" 15'-5" •-' 15•-01 M 12-0" D LIT 0 UNIT L1 T�—_7 L—_7 2.-D• f' 30•Y I--�'•I 109-0"R.O.W. °SECTION SCALE:I"n6' ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL GRAZE — GRAZE RW GENERATOR 9:T ( I _ II ' r= I = I ==—' • -LED -ViD -VFD NCC NCC L I I I -,,y 1CDI 1 L 1I II 77.• —• 1I .J n I mL VAULT I ID ELFv 6. . In I I vl 1 I +1 ,I - - - I 11. 1 FF EL 1.20' I EI.E TOS EL B.a,J. :ry I. 11. I urvC0.ry RD .� 1-8 30 6' 15-0" 31'-0• TOS EL 5.69' I I 35'-/" 15'-Cr . ELEV.3.80'B -� 3•_O• �L"TBp.��UNCI N RD (REFER TO ROADWAY DRAWINGS)J �•.I �-1 ELEV.{.30•t 120'-9" I (REFER TO ROADWAY BARRIER WALL DRAWINGS) (TYR.) OSECTION SCALE:1•A•0• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH OPTION 1 MANAGER(AMYL MORALES DIRECTOR ROY COLEY,P E DRBG ENGINEER c ENGNEERO RECORD Iiia Name CPT1_03.6W9 STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION DOS GIVI Amy Relownor PUBLIC rYORKi DEPARTMENT 911£. IVIL 010«ER-11-,,,,,“0„.e:, -- — 1 mmno .��.. nra II lO ww— vAv.ar_ 11W CONe.Wai C.O.mNe MMeeEAol n mW Page 67()f,.,y'y+ CITY ENG9WER NElEg11LFE.WiIIE,PE. nMc.DTm. - 9 TIONSIID DATE REV610N PPM 8Y DY9:10/x/19 alma D,r.ep OR7 03 CO JD L c X 1 - I - i o N 7-1S l i 0 pilt.,:, 0 S-1Sit-.._.._ S•1SI O 19-1S .-._T_T - • 59-15 _____—__ r1c o 1 I o fOk 9E-15 -- I .2 co •u 8-1S ---------— o i t8-1S - -=.: __ Elevation(It) do .- a - - -. ' -•�,W iv - o - ^' 4,L. -• H_STRUCT1 11 ST-99 O O $rQrte�,: IM 8 _ .. T-49 O Q Oma. Vi O 1 1 -- 4. ST-47 STS 0 ST-43 0 •T-41 .T-39 lac 0 0 0 I ST-35 17-4111 II ST-34 \I 1 . IN-1037 11M, 1 41111M,: Al MI-I-1038 pipIN-1175 C I F 3 1, ST-31 co I. o ' Er ill s IffiliA Ii: -- ST-24 _— " ST-22 ST-20 - ST-19A ST-18 — . _ _ „ %. -"II 1 F°41111. 111111 IN-1128 ST-14A _ - __ ► ST 12 _-- ST-6A 0 ST-4 ST-1 m ' x Q E _ I , -L I J ] I i iL,I --I-- 0. 0 LxniDit a I i+ rpt : �. . s . ,'f'«A , = ,;i17 Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of 3 itxi 101, t< , t r� 19TH ST • dim-, *�• —19TH S a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West N ' '� i:j " " r. a-.� s:.., --' 1 . Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area p e S)moi 4 E . –. "`€ 0�,2 ' y..i ic.:w ,1 east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these L .3 a ( t results once drainage improvements have been completed s �- r 18TH ST ' ..,'.r 6 1 0 18TH STT, s .q S v*L S throughout the entire area east of Alton Road. ._..... U' . 'r - 1 t i tJJ . z 1, w.A , ! t E a17THST .lr.� w y H t T _ ' s o � z VENETIAN CSWY �. :- _ �a –' ' "M aorlVIIIIIiiim.-.7.' .�N LINCOLN LN ,yb m i i 11i „ ! 1,1101111.-- - .-- 'r• �•-'- T ... _ ,r est LINCOLN LN p r r► ' > ;LINCOLNd�ER a.�` � 171 a riti-. - --may ``o -, ir., , 16TH ST�� 1■! 16T . r� J � ' o, 1�;di` ".L..�a� �� SBU E� © 'ilia � s�N �� '�C.+17 i1+\ 11�� a "�� i151.i :. -g, .....%-_,- ZIT a q ass. „,„„r,m al sj _ 1 .• 15TH TER,asci — #° o fis1 ilk ‘111, r; ritipx ..„,4100 "t. ® 15THSe,T� �p[t�tYi !!liar "..1`.Pw 1` L' 1074 y•�Y ��" `'Efi p g 0ae0ESPANOLA WAS . t r,, o. EI w i a� o 0o bPmo/ LL 4dI Q .--a _ g :. l n r'•H'', .■■ '. -,±- , �a11Til,4 r 4�. tk as =lip.; ' 14TH TEfl ` y a E i� t ilei-=.Ni — r. m �is� 0 E=I14TH ST n es ".1 �' '� i 14 jailo `� �' ��lao� c, sf�`1'� almi ,: iii •4 f�i I'&11.- ® v%InF, x{14 O G �' I MONAD TER 'N1 y,. ate. . `.a 13TH Sr" , • L ■� 13TH ST °. 5 ., �. .m t , �� .vt ` 1, g h , igMtAr s r.. .C12TH ST `c lif O .• " c pm'12TH ST f r•sc qt V.1. • p= t s e rJ,: BISCAYNEBAY 11TH ST. . .,. � ,T w 1-=,-"'F_b Tr >> � car. ';. ':'-a- l .A,-<. � a:21,811r ■acv- a'.!'—i' el r4A N ''1 *r.,. -L.l UZI 10TH SEt_T ��__ 1111 F' *s !�'�" � "'s'�' � ..i� 4.-- 7 ,, `'T,LIVI �t�a�YAI wa ,.,,�K. , ''.1111. fi t`: r IQR;1l.9C._,.r z m STH ST - .'cr~. = -"F3 i ' ar 4 ".' Mit:,_0,u. t4' me � ;xr t f 3' rr' `r'._ii . _` BTH STS r' ti Wi=\\ g •_ = w 1TH ST 2'. 15',611,ip5 s a" ca m r7 0 y` t • 1�\ ,cc•r-' Mail e,. .T-'v" , '. PU "a 6TH ST H iT4Tlbit 3 ,IPIlir�,a apo a $r a I?I� k •1 • y, 6TH ST m 14, . 5TH ST 5•:. AA s- r_. �v: 1 J LEGEND < <+ i'T - 400 0 �_ �r 4TH;ST- .•; •` ''.: R'.' II-I _ Aff Q Rq' . a. Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) •} 9 !' } =* ; ,,, ,, R -: Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) i,; 9 , � ' *t-; 4 - Vis. . 3RD;ST 'i • Option 1-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall ' �, r = ' _ ,avillit + • o -.. ' -- t .oft • i - 4 rk . . .. t.'x , •-,t A� i CITY OF MIAMI BEACH N Ci9Feasibility Study CONSULTANTS P Option 1 (147 Ac) 1 inch=600 feet 0 600 1,200 Pit f NH Design Storm Event Feet Exhibit B APPENDIX B OPTION 2: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 71 of 370 Exhibit B IN R PROPOSED LEGEND: RIP-RAP BURIED AIT -PROPOSED PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC BURIED FPL SEAWALL CAP SIDEWALK.REFER TO - BURIED GAS TOP EL 520 ROADWAY DRAWINGS FOR -- BURIED f'IBEN OPTIC I DETAILS. PROPOSED TRASH RACK STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL- .1,,,, I —--— WAY RICH -PROPOSED E INV EL-11.5 DULY BANKS Ca ICH BA BASIN J2"ID FRP 60"ID FRP -_—(T-—__—- R.O W.UNIT DISSIPATOR PROPOSED PROPOSED WATER BOS EL-t1.0 SiRUCNRE OVERFLOW PIPE(A) PUMP STATION WET WELL TREATMENT UNIT TDP.) V STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE DOS EL-3.0 WV El-1.33 OVERFLOW BOS O -21.5 BOS EL-28.0MARTINO P MPS ® SANITARY OWER OLE �__ 7 IA%.: . - ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 32"ID FRP • - �QV�- • (V 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE DISCHARGE PIPE(6) , Q .Fan. BACK FLOW PRE VENTER INV EL-1.33 I r n-.N , r——711411 FIRE HYDRANT --.I I I F ® CABLE N COMMUNICATION BOY li L_IlL—\—J L--�I1L a wA1LHMErfRBDK IEL • -------N `DRAINAGE WELLS I O 111 957 DRAINAGE PPF I F IRRETE W I low LU .W. to V'EO 1 um ' PRU USED WET TAP TO I v � _--- r � EXISTING MAINTAIN 2"D.I WATER Y Mn CLEA A MIN �_ _ A,A OF s RYE SEWER �� I I� I II I -- __ ! Lincoln R d aCE + �]. pr— -. i 1 L I r •'�+ - •~-- _ --- .p r 1�ii' VTR •® PROPOSANITSED B" M _. RY I �, 1I wn _ PROPOSED CAP SEWER AND MH - P 3 AND RESTRAIN A F. a �j / Ito I W r --- ---4—, / -_.-.-yam I J OW ID PUMP I L STATION / f'- OVERFLOW / / Q �, �- ,, �—�-- �--�yX J//// PROPOSED ELECTRICAL fl } \L_ DUCT BANKS_ __ ;32-FLAP E►. 3FIExISnNG SANITARY VALVE(TDP) SEWN MH TO REMAIN EMSTING FPLPROPOSED 12"WATER MAW EXISTING GAS LINE DUCTBANK REMMI PROPOSED FIRE I HYDRANT NEW WATER -... I ENS TING TV BOK METER BOK(2) R.0 W. EXISTING SANITARY ITO REMAIN LIMIT SEWER TO REMAIN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IEIDW3„00' MG OP RECORD Bf ENGINEER CP RECORD MIAMI BEACH OPTION 1 ENNWNI aPn_OTa.9 CITY MANAGER.IMMYL MORNFB DESIGN ENGINEER-1.1.-. STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CIS MANN BY ,T Do,RNWWKa� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT El- / I�f VIL CHECKER ,B -- I 97/./20 wrwt„ RAT Book Popo Work ORIN.m.o.. romNceKN , R.N cENRORIVE NW.IRAoI.N WIN PROPtp6EI)ST _AN-PUMP STATION Cm ENGINEER Nam,PEEZJICOE,PE. ....LE R LE AS ROTawin M e. NO DATE REVISION _APPD.BY DrI I0/28/19 anal DWM„I. 01101 Exhibit B I I N . 1 1 ..-. I LEGEND: BURIED PTT BURIED FPL BURIED GAS -- BURIED FIBER OPTIC IRIGHT-OF-WBAS NAY ' (3CRE RIR„'.1)'NBA!) im \ STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE / S SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE '11.'1 Q M 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE O 0 0 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE C ® CABLE N COMMUNICATION B.N M WATER METER BO% CSI 1 aI Ia O 10 W _ xiso• I I Will w In ff(Th��J 7 �. CO W W IN fn ISI o 7.25. I O Et Et 4k-1 F GB r I I Lincoln Road I k t-C_.I '� 1 ��, sa«m � a7 ig ASTE M a lal Z LLI I J ----------- ----_..-- _.-. - .__ .J _ — � I= 1- I F I I 141)1) I INC1)1 N Rn MIAMI nn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NEKESSEIBTO Y it/ \l V YI bL OPTION 2-UPDATE �� EMc.OFREcrnu_h. ENGINEER OF RECUTA'. FM Name:OPTEU_02G.g STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION DPECTOAGER:ROY EY PE DESIGN ENRINEER.E1- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .Lp�j7e7]µint ,_F�'(1 .a. '' o.IECTGR RormLer,PE. uBEDAERRAM —� a^`I'R"""'�- nmmP.a1mN main RmE WY GLH.a v,x PROPJ DSI E FLAN Crtr ENGINEER-NELSON PEIEEACOME.PE. NOBLE R. ME ASPIAM RBC* SO aDARE AvA B PLOa: Nbk QOar.nua� AN-PUMP STATION SCALE AS NOTED DOTE REV.. PD BY ,0/25/,0 %,I,.., 0,..„g. Orf21/p2F Exhibit B II I N I � LEGEND: BURIED ATT __ BURIED FPL BURIED GAS if y Ill] —-- BURIED FIBER OPTC ® RIGHT-OF-WAY I ' \ OTP+A Rn II'. Y NMsO al CATCH BASIN.NAN VSw ® STORN DRAI ROLE TE �__-_,— _-__ �i ii ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O — CG CAL MANHOIE -.. , •I 0 ETELEPHIONE MANHOLE CIC N COMMUNICATION BOX M--_ _ - , %./ ' ® WATER METER BOX 0 ~I W W W W z C1) 41 W / r-11-1—tall-77TRR*4q-4k � W in 1 e _ , y r‘A+ JTB.BD f $ T .1317 �� W NM n n.Yl T-'T E 00 ,{ 1 n 3 LIaeol ROad a- • 1nB).00 i in iiii IA co W_ W — J _ ✓ L=1 --------^j-------------------------- , T NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH `t°e�°� OPTION 2-UPDATE 3 ENG OF RECORD lAC ENGINEER OF ECVN) FW.MN a OPT2U3_0]WNB DIRECTORGE0.ROY CL EY,P ES DESIGN ENGINEER.- STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION COS ,T sW..rwrm: 9T£: VV DIRECTOR ROY COLEY.P.E. 1.1.— OMAN BY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT p�l� 7q(� (�.[IVIL ......II.I. CITY ENGINEER:NELSON PBF2JIG01E,P.P. DNECIO:A 'R BERM =a TG. ENN Book_ Pp'. PONY Or. NI.... 10p�^BA1ON COMP PPNE''E^B BFAp1`L IMO PROPCI�JED SITE PLAN-PUMP STATION .„- RS NOTED h� T ND-PATE - REVSM)M AwO.BY Dr:IP/m/10 Sham 0,,,„„B_0v-72u307 Exhibit B ilT I n I I PROPOSED DRAINAGE PROPOSED 18'0 DIP STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE WELLS I PROPDRAINAROW.LIMIT B PROPOSED CONCRETE 'P8o If > ;DSCRDRDE STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE WELL —._ (SCALE FOR M.«1,',KO S. N DRAINAGEINLET PROPOSED 16-FT PROPOSED DIAMETER PROPOSED CONCRETE WELL — -- INTERNAL DIAMETER INTERNAL DIAMETER STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE 0 / SEDINENTaPON TANK WET MEI[ 1 N _ r II 12.1 FI / IF W CA1 `DRAINAGE INLET �l W INW W ,� PROPOSED ELECTRICAL W CS) - F'� DUCT BANK CORRIDOR I. I y iii""„ .v:'°3`3 O inl lo . 320400 331.00. - 3/1100 01 d 1 + - .� - , +_- N R I P e Lincoln Road N C., M Q x a CO I EXIST EWE DUCT J EXISTING IR PROPOSED SANITARY— CO WATER MAIN TO SEWER AND MH W BANK(TMP.) BE RELOCATED W Z I J J II= I- V a aH �I II I -- — • I Lr__ ' � HN L�MI LEGEND: ATI URIED FPL BURIED GAS MIMEO FIBER OPOC ———— RI01T-OF-WAY • CATCH BASIN O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOII S SANITARY SEWER MANH(N.F © Et ECTRICAL MANHOLE © TELEPHONE MANHOLE kWeRe BACK FLOW PREVENTER O FIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE TV COMMON„ i.,•, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION M WA TER ME TER IB, ' \H I „I OPTION 2 ENG OF RECORD I. ENGINEER OF REOORD AIAMIBEACIII' .. STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CITY MANAGER JIMMY LBOAR MORALES DESIGN ENGINEERIL_ .-- DIRECTOR ROY COLEY P E OHM.BY. 3 T Survey Rek�enre PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT "IB �pE 75 �c�w1�IL �� CHECKER. •R -_----.— Worn p.pF.ems. _ Page NA,�t o�l., ,��,•.�„ Imo CO....tWlPnvIVR.I..R.INAOR RL MIH PROP RSPEDSITgfPLA •• CRY ENGINEER IR9.D(IN E9W JMAl.RE SCkA AS NOTED R AEG 1.501 1 nN O" y DS N-PUMP STATION NO DATE REVSKIN _ APPO BY D.. 10/26/19 an.._ OPT2 03 Exhibit B MATCH LINE STA. 145+50 (SEE SHEET OPT2 05) ----. - _ --.— — r — — — — — — — N I STRUCEUROE FOR DRAINAGE WI 1I PROPOSED DRAINAGE- CONFLICT STRUCTUREPROPOSED DRAINAGE a TIT. STRUCTURE RW_OMIT / 1 d PROPOSED SANITARY SEMER AND MM R.O.W.LIMITMIi ' e • O NI a1 O II'S:Ill S CO w I W U) + uAwo 325400 N I_ 1 _ T I -- 1 1 M Lincoln Road F IR Ili ZPROPOSED ELEC' AL 1 3 DUCT BANK CORR,.R i 44 ilitc ze:.,. ROw LINITJ \ / l��R.O.w.LIMIT .111000. - LEGEND: BURIED Al l a - BURIED PPL BURIED GAS . . BURIED FIBER OPTIC ---- RIGHT OF WAY al CATCH BASIN ID STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE O SANIIARY SEWER MANHOLE O ELECTRICAL MANHOLE O TELEPHONE MANHOLE .ca. BACK FLOW PREVENTER O FIRE HYDRANT IN CABLETV COMMUNICATION BO[ ID WATER METER BO* NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 000HBOl001) ENG OF RECORD . ENGINEER OF RENRD MIAMI BEACH OPTION2 CRY MANAGER l OM Nem OPT3_O.EWg JIMMY L MORALES DEMON EMGNFFW� STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CIS COLEY Survey* PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT nnr 1 7(,of C�L/V�7IL .. GHY ENGINEER NEMERPEEZ.MCULE.PE "I`-0`EW .LR _Ro` .MFF I aTRI/m NORMA �Fwn m>_ �. MANN. 11mmR.TIRORaMEH MANE.M.M SEAOL.L vw PROPOSEVSi 1 e PLAN-PUMP STATION SGLE. MN.. R 1M) DATE REVISION ARPC BY CNN. IA/RN/TB SIN. pM.yW OR2_04 Exhibit B 1 a--iio_.,......x 1L__, _ . _ T NOSY.DRAINAGE Li(SOLE FOR II'x WSW) I STRUCTURE G I , 1 1 1WORM F 1 I. I` _ .... BURIED ATT d I 1 R.O.W.UNIT _- - - BURIED FPL Q II /— _ --= BURIED`BS - L/ -- BURIED FIBER OP C W -�- ----~--��, ---------------- —--— RIGHT-OF-WAY -- _- -_ _- - 0 CATCH BASIN Z I _-- -- -- _- . S STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NI W I e ELECTRICAL MANHOLE W TELEPHONE MANHOLE Co . BACK FLOW PREVENTER I i [1 FIRE HYDRANT n ® CABLE N COMMUNICATION BOX so WATER METER BOX IIS Tr I West Ave F 1M+OD 147+00 _ 14+40 Q 1 I , I I PROP.FPL INFRASTRUCTURE / (DUCT BANK FROM 17TH ST TO LINCOLN RD 0 I 12-e CONDUITS AND 1/0C NEUTRAL) W Z J I =I -- -- -------- ----- --- - ---- ------------ ------ -moi l'...-. _ ____ _ EXIST.DRAINAGE R.O.W.LIMIT — — , . AmSTRUCTURE 1 ---- — MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET OPT2_06) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION voatemoce MIAMI BEACH OPTION 2 ENG OF UYMANAGER lMM L MORALES SAM SWBD"-i1°` ENGINEER OF RECORD .MN Name OPT2_ASEWg STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CSS ENGINEER/),J. PURLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT pP 7777 cIJ IL •.,,.., unEMGINEER ROY CORK PE CBE RY. R I s.v ,Ns.M ,m CONvERTION�IEA°MEAS. .FL Ma 'nu' PROPOSfSITEf RCA NEieox FETaz.wa..E R. n:TSMW rE ONBE F.M Sm. PWA rcMa.M. N N-PUMP STATION sc4E R AS NOTED NO DATE REVISION APPO 111 op. I0/25/11 s.e1. aW„I„g OIf2_00 Exhibit B MATCH LINE-WEST AVENUE(SEE SHEET OPT2U_05) -- ---- — _- -- — _---- -- _ _ --- — - 1671 WEST AVE. ROW UNIT , 25--) PROPOSED ._ -. ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK \ /------ /` - IscNF FOR II.•IT McEB �� N LEGEND' /� \ --salr-- BURIED ATT \ " .-- BURIED FPL CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FOLIO 02-32]Y01J-0080 \ j / \ — 3-- BURIED GAS / N. —-- BURIED FIBER OPTIC / RIGHT-OF-WAY \�\ // \ N., M CATCH BASIN S STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE \ \\ / \ 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE / \ 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE �/ / 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE / \\ \ .\ \.\ FLOW / \\ \ FIREKHYDRANT PREVENTER / N. / ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOA = \ / / U WATER METER BOX 11] �ROSWITCH \\ \\PLATFORM \ / /EL BH' \ / / TYOF MIAMI BEACHCITY(OMIAMIBEACH / N\ \ FOLIO02-3233-017-06Y0 /FOU0 02-3233-017-0060 \EMERGENCY / \ GE[IERATOR SET\ \\ 'N / / \\ v SLAB.EL 5.68' .\ LIMN ' w 14.00'--1 \\ / \ / \ -,,,,, ,,''/ / I 20.04 I� N j F s' F.VAULT l\ FF0.4 .'t \ \ \ % ' \ J NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IDMIBQRNWO'. RECORD JAL ENGINEER OF RECORD FI x OPTION2•UPDATE OF EERY """`0T211_06 2U�`0•' STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION DIRECIORA .RNRA MORALES IGN ENG suryeyRree O S ROY CO ET PE DMNl1 BY IN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT T �32p 7R�{ VIL CSS CITY ENGINEERCHECKER .0,000 OOe.iTT.1 FAla Bow-- m. MMkOra.r:N6i.L coo`°"rE"„°"°`"„°D'"�'""'"1BFACXi""° PROP�I�iD SIT AN-PUMP STATION - NELsaNPEsz.ucor�E.PE. SLE AS NOTED SWGK,we. NO TE REVISION AORD BY DaceOT u,.,1,,,: O!T2U-06 a/zs/,s SN D Exhibit B rn x' da Q O �D 1aa'1 T O mP - t0 P'1 ®1 +a ;�°S' • F v~i E 1„,_,I------- m an iv�i c i to �n iw°�o r; i o 1 jpri ® 0 0 Cu' . ..„,„_., I M 1, 3 -1 '' -1 u lU 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Station(ri) Page 79 of 370 Elevation(fl) IIIIII . 6.' 4' ''' ''''' -. RASH_STRUCTI ST-99 1A m 'JD' c .<. �, � � -� ST-49 0 0 0 co -.I O ST-47 ST-45 6 ii T-43 T-39 V .= --, 1p.o..10 IN-1037 MF-1038 co IN-1175 o` ST-31 r. _ � • PIP o f ST-24 I. ST-22 -- lIST -20 ' ST-19A ST-18 .--- IIIIIPAIIMMIPK rillit iiiIN 1128 H3 ST-14A --i ST-12 , ST-6A I I I I i ii : m x m- _Q in — 0 CAI iurn o 4 Imo' - ;, Disclaimer This map displays the modeling results of T. .19THS M1d 11,,,:f . 19TH ST . a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West i c''ck, ..W - `_ Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area a '' t �W .y ,�' N. tk� M.3_, F-' � `�•H a a'D., t�w`, •►6 . east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these -- ,Z...< ,, ' 3 - ,t - - ' results once drainage improvements have been completed . •'° v=• "' ' ",18TH ST` . .,a y". 18TH SST } throughout the entire area east of Alton Road ri : : -v 1'. /- i M ,fp -.141' D. . a - -t it''"_ Ige • ' ' ' ili.t.t.. ...,..-- ...4u . ... .:,.........,,:....!'-g..t. '.. E.:.o � r'i _ -•w•-a k17TH,5T •-OP, "r a ,a�i� 1>' �Q �.��,,: fl% � ate: r • VENETIAN CSWY ` :oms. . " -.r_T=n- y�f Yy V 1F �� R+._ rN LINCOLN LN g t • (rJ r M�j ,4 �I.Y -211 . - _.. o'""7""-..3ncrs to, X LINCOLN RD ,� �� 1 �^ f �- ,,., 4�' LINCOLNv. p r: t .� Ems, �,� ,�. LINCOLNdEA;� ��x!11 o E � r �..—. _ p I ?_�. 7 i C i +� a+is Y i._ '"' 9 ��illiir :^ a, S wra �m 16TH ST .. 0 mss. ris ` m 1 1. �.r ►• t' 16TH ST�� -' 7 , 1 • 15TH'TEA - a *.■ 016E. .,•N' — a,T-----1".r.., +r E 1 ✓tel n p eta. Gly© 3 © .--� � 16'4,4 r ' p:r �e �w r �1]?® awes 155TTHST u� ®d•t! llli�/C �w r . ''t. ' ' ' , "11 a ,�. ' _IIIA _ El ,�t �v i°11 -- •> 1 -i.%' .,, �� tffift _ oder ESPANOLA WAY. V vWe ' «ti , ' , q.t_ 'r1 14TH:CT � .1,- " °.1-s• ��I HPL tr.,,- sa - 12 r ,\ - r14TH�TER ,'... • L' ". ii a �d i . r- fr I,:' it . _ �� o CO 6 .s `6. > /� a t= 14TH'ST 11 ._, o® R�m 14TH ST �,�� C. �- yon ® PF.E p 1`.,m��.: �,P K milt. Stair .a MO IAD TER :1 LLL I& I''' No 13TH 5T is Vit 4'2;4 i "*""r 13TH ST ae d f• ,oc r[�1. V! ,y; �$ 1.� F. 1, + J, 0 q .moi.= .+.4i t R:- rr E • C 12TH ST ' O 7 12TH ST r, ,,. , 4.i j I'4 C EEYJCE BISCAYNEBAY f.t. 111TH ST 6. r p = - ...;aIi r• te,,; v0 . t� y� 1 1111":1 a1�'®' s_ l '49-g, �■ ^"..• t.�T _ti �g}^�i, �.. O. 0. 1 10TH STSA R "y• ko \ t . •i i- 1'4111 -°W 3G! .wmg WV o ':,: oo �>4 , a +w._ m ^'wlli �F�r-wsu-it fl `-i� .I f '°fir' t t Fig:/ . o.'' >� r o 8TH STM F ;; k. ,Ii'as1' or 4AJfr r �� 9A� . yT" a -. c� • +r - cafllA i f d r meq' '-, it t ! a ❑� sgri. f r �_ F s FT ~• , .= - ZT _ / it ��.+ 2 , 4 i • r'-aa4.. ,o r ►.- m ` - c 7TH ST;�_ • m ar{"' %..` o.! - : !\1�� ,�b = 1�.. r. H + �• ©� C Jai , r 4•, ' `!`, a 6THST •,•„,,t-___:.- Q ` , . _ �o r a a _, Jt . 6THST ••:,,,, iL a, m 'qtr Y A' TH ST E .1 d� *f' A' a r! -Q • LEGEND 'T ' ' ` " ' - _ o ; L 't'''}', 4TH:S1 W o _ Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) y ' t,' �-rr N + Proposed Project Area Sub Basins(147 Acres) 90 - ' �3RD,ST .. r _, f a. ,• Option 2-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall :t • a� a g -ti A '� • a' : A. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH /" Ci 9 Feasibility Study Option 2 (147 Ac) A 1 inch=600 feet `°":°"""Ts P fFr 4HR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,20eet Exhibit B APPENDIX C OPTION 3: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 82 of 370 Exhibit B MATCH LINE-WEST AVENUE(SEE SHEET OPT3A_02) --=--___ —=--�—=—---_— --_— ——— — __---------T--T 1671 WEST AVE. _ �z 36-P HOPE -- .-- ._ 12-x12'DUCT BANK (1YP.6 e) �� _. _.. FOR POWER CONDUITS TT T 7r,17---'.„.,---'— T_- 135HP PUMP 1 I ke��F i1 L Y�(TM.OF 6) P �l 20.50 3 Ai i - g W.N ( ti N NET WELL !i LEGEND: ' f i IItBANK All I� B-�DUCT �.... )_SHP SUMP PUMP �.�� BURIED ALT `rtI' ) ( 7 is u T (TIP_OF 2) �� BURIED GA __ffi 9TP --.iiR BURIED GAS BURED FIBER OPTIC �,, LII r I/;1 ( -- RIGHT-OF-WAY 1� l -J1ATER TREATMENT 1111 Irl" I V +NIT(TTP.) CATCH BASIN 0 STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE CONTROL PANEL--...- I AEA —-- 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 'ELECTRICAL PLATFORM .i. I—1 I I, -T �^ - —"tMANHOLE 0 lLECiRICAL MANHOLE o O TEL ERHONE MANHOLE 1 f- — — BACK FLOW PNE N ER . O FIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX 8 I I M WATER METER BOX TRASH RACK ...r.-_-.7:— STRUCTURE ® i ce Ile Or FOR I -— POWER CONDUITS r 6A 7 . I VM 1.250 Kw EMERGENCY GENERATOR SET SLAB EL$.89' I PUMP DISCHARGE L I F. RAWELL OR WATER QUALITY FFnF.Er. L4 T.20.0 l I 1 . T 2a.DM, • P ' Ij OTT DF MIAMI BEACH OTY OF MIAMI BEACH OTT of MIAMI BEACH E000 OT-3233-017-0080 FOLIO 02-3233-017-0070 -I 6.67 L FOLK)02-3233-017-0060 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH �� OPTION 3A ERG OFRE...SL ENGINEERaRE I.N.,.OPT3A-III.B.9 ORECTOR ER JIMMROT t EY PEE$ OES.11 ENGINEER.41.1.4_ STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATIONNS BMIWFRMNwcw PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BRE"' v' Pp nn(( VIL °LECKER 3R PARAsom.o.PE I mnM/07/./10 O R FNM Bonk_ Pape MISCALE . welt'CA _ IMOo .W.rOKCD..FPOPNY. "°6' .ft' PROPO I SIT n NNELSONAN-PUMP STATION aENOEER NELSON VHaFz,Mcae,vE. SCALEASOT E NED IC WG IWnoN NO DATE REVISION APPO BY Dye 10/25/19 BIw1--__-- _ R,„,g OPT3 01 Exzhibit B INS (EO•LiFOP„• r., SNUG I'l --- X BURIED ATT O _ R.O.W.lBllT BURIED FPL C -_ BURIED GAS F -—_-—__—_ m.,e--- BURIED FIBER OPT __ _ _ __ ___—__�__ - —__� RICHT-OF-WAY CATCH BASIN W .. +. STORM DRAINAGE =I ® SANITARYSEWER MANHOLE In I STORM WATER NAGE CONFLICT ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE - 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE W WATER MAIN CONFECT BACK FLOW PREVENTER y _ T) FIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX n - AT&T UNE CONFECT - III CORRIDOR Y WATERID SANITRY SEWERTONGECORpORWes!AvoAINAGWW.111111111 .. DRE CONFLICTT —, FPL DUCT BANK illi W coNFucT _1 = "11 I 1 , J PROP.FPL INFRASTRUCNNE Z I (DUCT BAN FROM URI ST TO LINCOLN RD ' ,2-8-CONDUITS Me A/OC NEUTRAL) / ir. .-- r -�(M.a Q]IUN C I I E%IST.DRAINAGE J T G STRUCTURE F.O.w.U 1 MIT J —_--_ T L. I . I II MATCH LINE(SEE SHEET OPT3_01) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AM OPTION 3 ENG.OF RECORO.J,GL DM ENEER OF RECORD'' FtA Nam OPTS_02 a.g MI A!V II DC/1LI STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C- 9 °RECTORM H MORALES DESIGN EMG.EER. . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - REROI ROY COIE..PE. DRAM BY R , �� s"^'T , M,. ,Tmoo-NORH RmuK.E..wriaF I,PM PROPOS SIT�fPLAIL cur ENGINEER Nasty F9Wz.MCOFE,PE � GS R. MNVF.a PE m/W FNM Bmk:_ Pape- u..oro.. N-PUMP STATION NO GATE w. REVISION Asw sr Oi IFIAT/Ts SN.) 01__02 Exhibit B MATCH LINE STA. 145+50(SEE SHEET OPT3 02) I � 71- STRUCTURE CONCRETE STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE Mill -- F P STATION DISH ROE CORRIDOR / CO m3 1 � RO_W.LIMIT ullw liMrl I / LVL pu,1 RANK 7 \ / ..NFLICT / \ F d I c ---_. I- _ _ — -- - -. _. .I --- I .. --- --- - ----- W - --- - W MT I Id I W • " tip;C WA II oHA� ncr W - • -..-. -. I I 323a00 I i 1 L SANITARY SEVER CONFLICT 511.00 -_.. I I - I _..-_- 335100_ _ .+__-_-____._ _ I N I I �� - - ,..01 Lincoln Road I 1 F , PUMP STATION DISCHARGE CORRIDOR MN GAS LRE NJ I I CONFLICT 1 CC I f .. FPL- CONDUCT _-_._ _._._ _T.� ------ __ -- -_ - __ -_ __�__ �_ R.O.W.OMITJ \\// `--ROW.LIMIT _- LEGEND: .,, BURET)Alf BURIED IP BURIED OAS ... BURIED FIBER OPDC --- RICHT-CF-WAY • CATCH BASIN O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O ELECTRICAL TIAN.. O TEl EPHONE MANHOLE BACK FLOW PREVNTLR IN• FIRE OUTRANN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CABLE IV COMMUNICATION BUx EI WATER ME TER BOx 1M1 BEACH W RD OPTION 3 ENG Of RECO . ENGINEER OH RECORD He MMR OPT3_OSU.q A CRY MANAGER ANN,M(WPLES ENGINEER-UT-. STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION COB s�W.,'N.r.ra. N DIRECTOR ROT COLEY P E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT nnL PP q�55 �{�T�[Lj,IL • .. ___ - _- , PTmnP M..RK DAMN Page - DDSO En... _ IIRON IT OCOMPOw..NIw MACK FL 33119 PROPOSiVSITgf PLA CRT ENGINEER NasoNFEMEz,PLO.E,PE. CHECKER As NOR D00CAIT M AP �. N-PUMP STATION ,NO a REVISION PD BT ORRE To/ESP. p..„„I,o OPTS 03 Exhibit B N PROPOSED 16-FT • PROPOSED TEG•DIP INTERNAL DIAMETER FOR DRAINAGE WELLS SEDIMENTATION TANK i . '� PROPOSED 16-FT7R.O.W.LIMIT --- A INTERNAL DIAMETER o b G WET WELL 1 STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE WELL .r.� PROPosEo CONCRETE- Oe OLAF FOR 11.A TT SNEED T ♦ 0 r PROPOSED CONCRETE ei O \.el I / \ /S „1„i Z ' n STORM WATER_ 1 H DRAINAGE W \ , a ii W H EGGING WATER MAIN-- O Eu }O n I1 t I N ` I Lincoln Road 01 N a s // t I- I FPL DICT BANK— GAS LINE PUMP STATION WSORAR/f CDRRIDOR • 00 La _ Z11.--- 1= J I V — V2 41- I — - i - - -_-._ / `RO.w.LIMIT LEGEND: BURIED Ail BURIED EP BUR.GAS HURIEU FIRER OPT(' —--— RIGHT-Of-WAY • CATCH BASIN O 51011W DRAINAGE MANHOLE ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O ELECTRICAL MANHOLE o TELEPHONE M ANHUIE BACK FLOW PRELENTER • FIRE HYDRANT CABLE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 03 N CUMMUrvI�n HUN RD% M WATER METER HIS - _ NIIGIR01I OF iEWRU . ENGINEER OF RECORD. MIAMIBEACE I OPTION STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION AAN,ACEH,RA IG EER .T. CSS MYLEypE enE � �- ,OR ROY caLEr.PE DBANw PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT pypE p� 3C��IL ...ER—ILL.'R -ID:A w.w.o.PE =r-.-',A/Po WBETIN. ! Nbi Oitlei 2..'..., I.®mnE,N,uNCFATEP MTh.1.1•111.0,1.MIW PROPOSCI7 SITgfPLAN-PUMP STATION NCINEER N¢sDELceEz.w.wE.PE WAIF ASNOTED II RIA ppm. .--P— NO CR00 raEveol wvo BY ,VIP OPT3 04 Exhibit B I _ - I I I d LEGEND: N ' BURIED ATT C - BURIED FPL BURIED CAS Il o la 2o I BURIED FIBER— RIGHT-OF-WAYDPnc in CATCH BASIN I 0 DRAINAGE INLET R.O.W.LIMIT�- ;' I lSCUF FOR 11 .IT SHEET) Qo STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE V 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE C ,k 0 �"I OO ELECTRICAL MANHq,E 01 V O TELEPHONE MANHOLE r. 0 SI CABLE N COMMUNICATION BOX fol J \...... M ® WATEF METER BOX O __ __ — _I - — _— _ - W W CONNANICATONS DI UNE TO REMAIN I x W I ---� W lair) IN /E EXISTING WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER I N _ — - O is Ir 110 t 319+00 319+00 M Lincoln Road M N PUMP STATION DISCHARGE CORRIDOR y INZ _ W Z FPL _ _ _ ._.___.__ J 1 I I— i I- a I a f-- I ----- -- -- -- R.O.W.UNIT -- -- -- -- \ N. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NEIGHBORHOOD. OPTION 3 ENG OF RECORD.J,9G, ENGINEER OF RECORD STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C-OS GUYMWAGER.OM,MORALES EWWGN ENGINEER D.r F�IeNa R oPT3 osa.g PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IL ,,.I. CRY ENGINE ROY IPNR P.E. MM. BURSA FAR.. a"" Me nr.E. pP pp77 ��{�jj DwECTOR. -- 2.+.3%K. ICON`N110H,`,r,D.,.mmwB`N,,,,"s PROPOS SITgfPLAN-PUMP STATION ER NELSON VEREz,Mcwe.v.E srALE.ER AS NorED RRrC00000Ma O aDARE APP u.BY 005 STOOL vA,M Order NI ` TE REVISION 10/15/19 p„M„R, 0►17-00 Exhibit B IN —6-0 PUMP 1 S1PCLPI SARED DISCHARGE COF )VENTMP. LEGEND: I ----- -I- 1 PROPOSED PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC BURIED A11- SEAWALL 11 SEAWALL CAP SIDEWALK BURIED FPL TOP EL 5.70 BURIED GAS 4 BURIED FIBER OPTIC I —SSSIPATOR ® ——— STRUCTURE ————— J—R.O.W.LIMIT _-_ / (MARE fOP 11'.ISE W[ET) RIGHT-OF-WRY 1 INCATCH BASIN BOS EL-3.0 O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE r—_�• O° SANITARY SEWTM MANHOLE —43'ID TRP -_ -_- ----- © ELECIRICAI.MANHOLE gSCHARCE PIPE(6) 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE INV EL-1.33 - BACK FLOW PREVENIER t'4 U FIRE HYDRANT - RE-BACK SUPPORT FUE ® CABLE IV COMMUNICATION BOX _ STRUCTURE I ® WA1ER METER BOX (TYR OF S) 0 DISSIPATOR 5 }+ IW L-- L - W I ---— 1 P°' W 1 iiai I) ..11 .. I N - 3,.;00 I i r.;� ncoln Road — 1 . 1 N. L M CAP AND- III +.- RESTRAIN Q i .I I PUMP 516101 DISCHARGE CORRIDOR lil Ar FLAP- I \ // I Z VALVE (1YP.) / J IS I II n 2 H m ff, EXISTING SANITARY T //]/'' SEWER MH TO REMAIN -.1EXISTING PROPOSED 12'WATER MAIN LXIS TING GAS LINE DUCiB,,,,,,ss FPL FIRE HYDRANT --___ _ - I R.O.W. EXISMNG SANITARY I WIT SERER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RO0100o OPTION 3 MAWIGER!WOOL MORALES DNOOF IGN ERNC*DEE -.U.— DRAWN T. ENGRIE£ROP REO]RO FM wa,.OPTS.06.0 J fir'-i STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION ��L� c DIRECTOR ROY COLEY Pe DESIGN BY R J Survey.""" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ERR PP 1�yr�IL LJ cm ENGINEER LIMON FEREz,vcaLE.PE 0E R JR L�MLN FE I IT/SODA sae. F'q Back 01 _ "�`O`Osr m�IM_ IMO CONVENTIONCENTEN M.T Num KARR FL mJ. PROPOStei4 PLAN-PUMP STATION suED AS NOTED r JULL NO DUE REVISION APPDKr D. 10/35/1I sNW_ -— gw0,g. OM 04 Exhibit B E D x 0 pir ,_$ t ,f, .7 co,„. el 0 I - I -2-_ _ -_ . 111111 -3 — _ a li ' ' 'Ula L' e' + ! W _•4•: .. �� 111 1.1 200 400 600 000 1000 1200 1400 1600 1000 2000 2200 2400 2600 Station(ft) Page 89 of 370 Elevation(fl) d' N C- . W di. 4' Y' b w ', - o - r? STR wham=H UCTI NZA-0600 7 ST-5lA cr o o ::: m co m i oa W o� � ST-45 ST-43 ST-41 o -39 o f -37 L ST 35 o o I-- , ST- 334 1 ilbilk 1037 MI+103B colitinalairf IN-1175 P. ND rill 0 x IL ST-31 EMMEN o o IMPo 1 . \ST-24 III ST-22 o o 1 , .. ST-20 — -- ST-19A ST-18 o 112 -- IN-1120 -- §T,1 3 .. ST-14A x „ ST-12 o@fi`§A � ST-7 _.. —_ --ST_ ______ ST-4 yam` - ST-1 m- — o I 5- o o co CAI IMI 0 n • `"� Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of Vail r ' ` 1- I- 464 99TH ST� 'am' ii-_19TH a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West j ',"_ ¢4'''-' T{ . „�Q . '" - •, Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area t... t wpm l y- ,- p�0� , ,- .+I • east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these .3 f - e 18TH ST y i. results once drainage improvements have been completed i. 0 0 .18TH ST ,3, - wr throughout the entire area east of Alton Road. ♦ ,......."7k, H niffiffillitill _ �� 18T W t �./ Z- fi17THST-.- I L i.,` i^*gu A -iylt _"U - •r a ��,qR1 ♦ I ]I .•.344■ �a -7,_.S. = v +Y., H VENETIAN CSWY-�' �] ;' W ' ,Ilp 'I Ali 'o o a 'f�� ^ ' L. ,i,,NLIN�COLN N �, 4 :'; t` to z L�. F x .r LINCOLN RD ..w �. 4 .0. • tom"". _ .J -..� Egi, IF � ,�� .r.,..•,.' � I LINCOLN LN p � � 1, �., LINCOLN TER�� ' C o ' r ne. z �!.p _ ' ��limr r o 'way MS 'y r r �+ f -moi ww „i-E-- m om o - - r9" r© k. •16TH STIJR !4 16TH _ — �ao �a c_ -,-;! : pAf i,• W � ® Y -_ 15TH TER �� - .m._.,_ sa '.©-it o x - --, 71- El ilki. 1-Alti 15TH ST ®t16 !us '^ll, l i •! o- ,h ::AIL, I 1 . 01DE I_v�;.�'�,.., Ulliz 400_- , J�,..Ee ■W- . . �+ ,itgal �� af '�� gdpBT `� ESPANOLAWAY. 4 , Z." Iii....., w ii o oomP 11E11LAQ Ll �� F , ,.�... r •, 1 Irl-- 14TH.CTr cio, Q�� .. • •�E• w, Bt�AFoy` L�ii w a= 14THPL .es ie J as Oe' �,� P"Z,--hili • r„, ■' mlE=• Sri '' " f11 �, 'jr''' y. C� r� b f ii.:,;1.!i-rF F � � !'°.� •® gam 4. i MONAD TER .: A g, y,.. .r.,.. _A�` 13TH�ST-� Iff. C"kill*..; 4 ' 1rr "i`.a° 13TH ST o,� D11 mm i„ j. ViWI llar-quill- .;; ST © d��©�9 12TH ST n 't V quill- 12TH ST I:. _ tiir r. if. -a.1.;‘•.4.:it i 1,1 r -_ ' BISCAYNE BAY ' Pn jf�'�'ij' ' '4� 11TH ST � _ .' s .eco w`.- �. a .�yip z sem-t� � i;? �Y ©�g px.,iw,,, ate. #'t f3w o. � ��il11-11I-1111ill, .. Al W-P, rxa F: c': La - 7 f,_ �O ♦.b 10TH ST 1 , 1 a, ® o L7. g-L64. .'tt is k-4 2 • {C!`r. p l'� � © dim. p.� vii[ K. &,:t'. \I 1 A ,- Ir;i1INIIIIPIt4.yr, Cv'''1 Yee. m9 4R ' f y y N � Shi a.4 T A i .'~ ',4 IF . . uwN ., sry �iE4�t:.pay • Gtl€ �o 8TH ST c. , ��ss �+ Ye a _ r,-� ate: �� ,,f.,*,: .t.. 0_ h.... ent s d o 9 m�1 d r. rr-vr' 'tea 11 i we Qzoo 1 l ,,, ,e.' .., " 1 :. m � � 7TH ST k..,„,.......,--- .......,q 1 �y --77 f� y,..' 1 yl ��1 a 6TH S1 _ jjj 7 g H 1 'I(a- oo Q ? ' �s xn ‘,.,_6T11 ST all .a ,Y_trTHST 5.. z,.� LEGEND #+oho 7 �' .U4 s-. 4TH:ST '1• ,Q o Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) q� r - - 1 o ) or'_ Z Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) 4%IL y90, „41 '� •_ 3RD,ST` . + Option 3-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall ` ,v - - . 1 . � 4 * . CITY OF MIAMI BEACH " Ci 9 Feasibility Study Option 3 (147 Ac) l inch=600 feet A CONSULTANTS PltfFfY4FIR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,200 Exhibit B MATCH LINE-WEST AVENUE (SEE SHEET OPT3A_02) --- --� 1671 wEsr AVE. a--�>�z - - ,-____—__ -..._ — , ..__ — ,— _,.___,.._ 36'6 HDPE T ——————— 7 12-.12-DUCT BANK (T1P.OF 6) I FOR POWER CONDUITS L....,,, 136HP PUMP r• 516 9 -I (TYP CC 6) I 20.50 J42 ,, NE ' I In-, -jiiii NET NELL till 1.1 'I' 8•K FOR CONTROL 1�r Y1 _-_ - ` ' CONDUITS J.SHP SUMP PUMP - -- BURIED ATT (TYP.OF 2) e o BURIED FPL IM. 'ETP BURIED GAS II' - BURIED FIBER OPTIC '„ 1 (- , __________ ATER TREATMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY I�� E.„1 , f CATCH BASIN LI�� I NIT(TYP.) ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE CONTROL PANEL1 J ® SANT TART SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRICAL PLATFORM 1 URI( 1 FL 8.44' T `MF • ELECTRICAL MANHOLE I1.11 I 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE 1 I _ 1111 n T' r - r_ .aw. U BACK FLOW PREVENTER FIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOO 00 WATER METER BOX . - — _�STRUREK --- STRUCTURE o 18"x32'FOR I - - POWER CONDUITS -- - ----94.1] - - - '1 ' 1.250 OW EMERGENCY - SLABR GENERATOR 9 'T I- (- _=14.00�1 f---1 1016 DIP SUMP I I PUMP DISCHARGE I I • 24'6 DRAINAGE WELL �i FPI.VAULT „ 0 FOR WATER QUALITYF.F.EL.4.20't II g 20.06 CITY QF MIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AMI CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FOLIO 0-3233-017-0080 FOLIO 02-3233-017-0070 moi 6.6] I- FOOQ 02-3233-017-0060 ------- --- 6 --- ----------------- T— -- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH R1b1B�,H OPTION 3A CITY MANAGER,WW ENG OF RECORD. ENGINEER OF W0000 Name VERSA_0.0, STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION JIMMY MORALES Debt"ENcI"BBa:J'7" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4 DIRECTOR11KTII: ROY COLEY,P.E. PRAM BY _ — N.» s""I'RM"810- v� pp�r� qq77��ff /�I rIVI� �� cnEcnFB: 3R AIM ee91. PWi: w.A o�6N lrmox6.Emnxce�tE.6MW,�WW.M .a.vts PROP �USITEj AN-PUMP STATION CITY FncxccR:NELSON FF-=>.RCDIEE,Pt. w>u F. OS NOTED a Mx No 72014 N0 6W.AAIF REVISION APPD.BY uW. I0/21/12 b _ uaw.Ire:_ ovnw_ot Exhibit B I I �z I :I / ilo _, Q ,.., / a IO -- -- -- -- - -- - - - -- -- - -- -- - II- W r ICI W STORM WATER DRAINAGE CONFECT W MWATER MAIN CONFLICT I W PUMP STATION DISCHARGE CORRIDOR -/ SANITARY SEWER CONFUCT rSANITARY SEWER CONFLICT I Z PROP.FPL INFRASTRUCTURE V 7(DUCT BANK FROM 17TH ST TO LINCOLN RD 12-6'CONDUITS AND 4/0C NEUTRAL) CC L _ ___ ___ MATCH LINE(SEE SHEET OPT3A_01) LROMNOI -----,..,- -- BURIED MT ----,,-, - - BURIED FPL -----• ------ BURIED GAS --- , -- BURIED FIBER OPTIC --— RIGHT-OF-WAY • CATCH BASIN S STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE S SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE S ELECTRICAL MANHOLE OO TELEPHONE MANHOLE .+>F+• BACK FLOW PRENENTER O FIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOK M WATER METER BOK NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMIBEACH OPTION 3A CITYMANAu,H �MY�EY UEs ERG OF RECORDS. ENGINEER OFRL NO FIA Nun.:OPTSA-D2. - STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION ECM.ERGMEERII� PUSLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT pP cc�� tt-;�Vf1' rj'�S DMEC,ON ....ERCRAM R 7/.420 sNrnM BWd.awr.«s: '� .memN.eRVNLEN�OWE.r.MrACK Raps onE PROPOSe�eSITfUPLANL RP ENGINEER NELSON FfPQ..Cam.P.E MRLIN RXIX. NMS.°F °BARS APPD.B. FeldE.* ...._ 0,..aw.— -PUMP STATION scsLE AS NOTED No LM1TE REVI60N Gm. ID/2s/,s gM_ _ 0,..,,,,,.oMrq. OPT3A oz Exhibit B . / \ 5.00 '/ OISSIPAtOR STRUCTURE ) i` \ ° �' ; .✓- Or.HDPE HPE 1 Y ♦ 10 (TYP.DF 6) / \ �I \ TIE-BACK SUPPORT FOR 1 X. ��t \ DISSIPATOR STRUCTURE `��`` \\cR.O.W.UWT \ 1 In,STREET PUMP STATION ` \ \ TRAFFIC LIGHT WWIIARM \ \ I ca \ 1 aP.ro likk\PUMP/STATION DISCHARGE CORRIDOR C MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET OPT3A 02) LEGEND: - ,„„ BUM.ATI BURIED FRE BURIED GAS BURIED FIBER OPTIC —— RIGHT-OE-WAR Bl CALCH BASIN O STORM DRAINAGE MAI! 0 SAKI 1ARY SEWER M UI o ELECTRICAL M H°, © III[PHONE MANHOLE .Frr BACK FLOW PREVENIER U VIRE HRORAN! ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BO% ® WATER ME"RBON NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VOGERHMIAMI BEACH � OPTION 3A MANAGER LOAMY MORALES ENG OF Y_. ..IQ� ENGMBAO RECORD FM Name OPTJA-OJ.0.g DESIGN ENGNEER� STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION Ca „ Nun,N°r.Is V ',RECTOR ROY COLEY P E OPAYM BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ° paper gg,pt ►/yriDAY ENGINE '” , sa,TT.L Fra B°0_ P.P.—_.-- Wal.Order,....I•.-_ "ORNAVA'"1OXfXfs.BANE,Wm."'.RAMO PROP0E6%1 6 PLANL-PUMP STATION ER rawNPERF�,wuE,P.e R ASNOTED Ti.BEG..T°�'"ii°P.°'FL °p�TE REVISION APro.ay p.p. to/n/tM ___ aa„W. Exhibit B APPENDIX D OPTION 4: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 95 of 370 Exhibit B N I I I I ,. i 1' i PROPOSED(25-0"X 15'-0")EQUIPMENT PLATFORM,CONTROL PANEL.SCADA.RN, ) \\�A 015 AND 010 EQUIPMENT. ■ )_y FPL PROPOSED VAULT L \ 6rue FOR i'.i�SHEET) CII II PROPOSED POWER PROPOSED FUTURE VAU T 0 DUCT BANK GENERATOR 5'-0' I r-._ .�__, — — ----- ------ -- LEGEND e _ I 11'-9' I 1 I O LII, ro _ _ --=-- - = j BURIED AU BURIED FPL r/e/7/ B. - -- BURIED GAS 1 n , 1e■ ' O • - yr BURIED FIRER OPTIC N I' ie NN--PROPOSED NEW i ———— LIGHT-OF-WAY --I CURB h CUTTER 0 CATCH BASIN 1 1e �, J ) O S ORM DRAINAGEMANHOLE 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRICAL MANHOLE -- I—p.2. I TREATMENT PROPOSED OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE STRUCTURE SSTTORY BACK FLOW PRE`.EN TER PROPOSED STORM FRE HYDRANT ( 21'10- �� , d WAI STRULlI1RE5 CABLE iV COMMUNICATION BO% � M WATER METER BO% II ¢ PROPOSED SANITARY 11 II I { �'� ,1'I �\I.I SEWER MANHOLE JPROPOSED SANITARY r'- -- Lincoln RoadSEWEREyi ��Lo SOPTABLincoln Road I \ di ra- §@ �� SANARYB NWE�1LmmJW1 ExIUCT FPL 7.-6 r \ TRASH RACK STRUCTURE PUMP HDPE INTAKE "S FUTURE DISCHARGE TREATMENT PIPE HDPE STRUCTURE BY-PASS PIPE EXISTINGSANITARY T� 1 1 / MAANHHOLLE i0O REMAIN 11 1 1 0159PATOR STRUCTURE I — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WDROORMOT. OPTION 4 ENG.Of RECORD AS ENGINEER OF RECORD _F°Nam°DPT. C-8^ CTYMANAGER JIMMY L.MORALES DESIGN ENGINEER_,LL. DI e°9 STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION uaecTOR: ROY COLEY, DRnwJBr_�iL Sun,BM.,.m: P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VIA q �f VIL n•� CITY ENGINEER NELSON PFRF,.umue PE c,2,.�-„ IA0NII,I Fe.Bol_ P.9° FCC OAF �e� •s poo u,N.FNI.IN EGIGT o°nL ewe NE,ce FEEB.. PROP�EDhP PLAN-PUMP STATION scALE AS NOTED R.WO N°.TEN NC m„E REVISION APPD BY 00.° 12/25i9 Nom, u.,„,,g OPTS 01 Exhibit B F U D t S aa OC. . Q N 'CT' Q!Q a 10 Cl .-6O ng Lfl .: CI ll' f"1 CP 2111.111111111111011111111111 .—__ � „ amgn ' �" o ! emo"" • � I � � i I 1, , . ;Li , ,t 44 • 11'I ,,:. ... ,,.tea___ .,. ... I ..--. - ----------- uu. .E i 12 -I- -11 11 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 140016001 00 2000 2200 Station(ft) Page 97 of 370 Elevation(ft) rt, = =• ' S '_iv- � o row LR TRASH STRUCT1 ST-99 0 o tflt am b ST-49 0 o w 0 1 ST-47 ST-45 v, i ST-43 ST-41 ST-39 I I, N l. -37 O O ST-35 ST-34 ITA3 o ph -1037 .r, MH 1038 I hp IN-1175 0 x I I ST-31 L., I ! i' ifilA x, LJ o ST-24 I ' ST-22 ST-20 - ST-19A ST-18 1411 ----77--1--IN-1128 gfi13 ST-14A SfifiT-1p2 t 7.. -6A g c I I ST-4 ST-1 m x m- cri Q o — _ 0 co Exhibit B r_ D CC H co .moo o 4.. m Ncr, o my ocg m r+ –®41 rn �n r+ ILF- f— J UL) N.0.9-, U) CI] (!} U! i!7 '-. COCO co UI l' 1 moommimmii D – ,7- --1 .1.sir' I _ . 11 o i I. aE r '',1.: i CLTI 1, � Il r, fYYY 1i n I ',, 11; -141 1 L ,t 4C --- -- -12 — — — — _L11 • ------ ----+— — 1 1 --201-0 400 600 DOD 1000 120 1400 1600 180_______--2000 00 Station(ft) Page 99 of 370 Elevation(ft) -7 o TTRASH STRUCT1 o -±PIM imidA ST-99 ifitA CD i I ST-49 0 0 o I j • 0 w 0 ST-47 — ST-45 • ST-43 "ST-41 -39 -37 --`: ST-35 ST-34 3 ; ST-32 - - .1 1037 -- - MI+1038 IN-1175 0 • -- ST-31 o ___ ST-24 ST-22 ST-20 — ST-19A — - ST-18 1011 ttYeea.. atii IN-1128 ST-14A ST-12 00 m v W CM-HOR a ';'"ti .t' 1 ` Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of -Oil' r•' -.',.1!,4':,::;, •# ,,' 19TH STS -.4, .....--_--r--191.14.: a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West ` t ' } -;�''r t�,,P, i Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area k� � Etre H 000 ,a;t a' " east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these `" Oa - K = �' results once drainage improvements have been completed o` v 3 y,16TH ST + -- 16TH'ST - throughout the entire area east of Alton Road. r • 18TH' ` - 1t �;.�t,r 'y'; -� t ii -'s'.t .e rile' • Z,..141 .rh t ',- i° ?' w' � Q ..er -+. ons a ,"�i11THST i h a `_ �!1 frw.r VENETIAN CSWV bp i re - i`,A',ll °• u T — - - a U '. "` IsTIF+ 1� ;� �� "`N LINCOLN LN a �, t , ��-: ikw, 1,_ : a � 1 m _ . + E.. 1.,.,_--.t: Vett X �^ LINCOLN RD ,s.,.. ......._..,4124, ,.. __ } ,.•� ,=J._J� 'lima 'HR icy , , LINCOLN LN LINCOLN TER y� — a �,- T . sr, • C.. .',0'. _14 . - ...et :-- - 'we '1.137 O .., } .. i wt■ tri m © T 16TH ST '� 16TH ST roo dm °G�''t.i ;i, / .. 917 rnY_O ®� _ . ® Fia ...�T'- '1,7„,,, • 1 liiii 1`.' 16TH TEA"tet N� Is' ,a;E•- �" °. .p ty - oII- ti'_'1 u�a m.• I I(�� • �1 St1 Q t}1� Nip__1 15TH 5THIIE carve + •t .r 1t "*.! [I /N.w §3 _ inn n E�SPANOLA WAY +� „. . + ° e r -' I U x 14TH PL rt ia4 rc"y : „.: � ' o Lj r-11165' e : 14TH T ,/z , z r� t m Cc� arpe i _ 'A pli;_zilj 14TH ST Niro ® ; .tall, t,_ 14TNST oo� i MUNAD TER t ,l; `: •,,, .�v, ori 13TH ST .-A it-; �r_.13TH ST .� • A� r ..•a '1 . .ryi t l` ` x is .Oii`,,.-.- a°pU •o IE. '.It,.,,, ct' at�l, � • �y.y,��r` it ■ e ^" ..r - . � PYA r „/„.=SI .- •rt C� ' 12TH"ST •�i e' 1 +t wh 14.4-9. 12TH ST O �`%07-1.;;14. 1 ;�, c:ty. • i BISCAYNEBAY _ �� 11THSTa ,,. i. • © o_4 f . .■ 1.,. F.. , r :-e7 M t: ..t a vt7sV ` ,..:1! . A. F-� ILItt. IA 5illi"7A! ® 'a • m a ,4�1,• y, '. a t b .eP I» �y, oe Drs i.,rc � e : ,\.\''' ��s L �� fir. *� y.h� w■ rt■t ,,r ,�� tOTHST �, Et` k_.4 ----;11-- il-- ---, 114;12". , - iS.LE Li=.0. fp,.. r! ..,.- w-7 y, e 1'5 t ilA• '• S IN ... 14 ---;,, N- '11F4111121•1"71-1:6C1: 11.- 9TH ST `11.r I*s e�M"3> , x ,r--rwi Z"11151. " 3. :: Ir • 4 , a 4, ��-a. `134. o r ry�P_^� � '+.w d. c BTH ST ! ,1 ..1194.,...k• •i tIrir�111 ■ w do o m f �; ' o -_. r- rte, ... `�o Z u 7TH ST _ Rc a ••••,_-___,-.4;:,...."11 Li �ry - '�.,_ y^ LTJ CAI IILJIL D 'If jia •. tt7. Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of • I pr 1 {' 191.113.1-111S ii—19TH.S a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West , Avenue drainage area considering o impact from the a �t�''• � F � �e\�%"y ' est of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these rea til ' H 'r ,3 � • . results once drainage improvements have been completed • •=:, 0 3 18TH ST - •- d' "' 18TH,.T l- • -' throughout the entire area east of Alton Road v 4‘ '- Fs +'s 18TH' s r+ �t�, • - #i. r�.�tt('"'- •b•T. 1M:RI i.. of z�.. is asV +�7 1 .p. '_ d Q - :ice t .'► ,... d ,Zo t 1r�1 _ • � a 11TH'ST • c11' �, VENETIAN CSWY r i �1 � - L "s _ o sk*4-"1 -1, w W Z ,� C : us*LINON�LLINNCOLNyIN !.- '�"`� .- �` a FF ` • lw -t iILA"" a. ,_ ;.... ' -- -1 .a r lanO x LINCOLN RD .4-11; ' 1,... N► ' '`. .,�"ti(' L-LINCOLN . 1 ,, . a....: r:, o1LN_ EJ+- p `,„ I LINCOLN'TER�y�� 111.pi " A 'y " o ;; r limp. - _ 16TH ST 16TH 6,, . . N oi.'�'J �� ii . ® ,i;;. � + w -�rig . 1: ' 1.. a. r—r.t tar tt i t - 15TH'TER 6' . ..,_ F. am, 4r1 mx • ` `S�"' : 15TIH�S,�.T, o I! f ii!so_r ,�rp w k i 't, >; -..xi p • g '3e®ra ESPANOLA WAY- , .. um. x rii u C. d■P�M ELCA L r f 4 r ase ., v +t may' • ✓' i •R t'. " 14TH,T 11,0" ■ - ° ca as �� ' A a °u=o �d� HPL., R7 11 .•No--1 r t. +\ �14TH'TER 1_I _'� =.-. o ST ' ri tT • +"i. . d • Y 111is :�;i . * Q, � pE14THST 14TH'ST ' o g i •,. +�, •,• AL t.i ��E, of i;`'ix, RIo � FSn few �. c� . oc■ 1 t t ,MONAD TER M ti" .c� w =+ 13TH ST , ir ` R i �-`.':' 13TH ST p[ r. c ,I.;,,.,•gr �r,, it, L °e ® � 'fir '7P .�'t. I `l�� Il�t.:at yyrL,;' /} J• 0 SNR ©® as., r V� }' n� i0312TH ST `� ..12TH ST -',, r j.• --AE, 0 -m7=0-0 . 4,... -- exit-- i 1 • tI: BISCAYNE BAY • 'edit r 11TH ST '44-13 ' • . y.]Is4 ® In _-may '= ao ,-.,„,141 rt �vrA ?., N 4 ",4111411,1110— 10TH ST ., lVg.� ,, v OP ,.- \I a- *MiieRl v W G�Ili ..- _ _ " o� ,...mlill-F.0111 ,•••••-•,..0 L.T, sr_ 4,,w,lowl. 1 14....10,11.421,14i r. ' • � s �nte M �._1% Attinir to - i... G-Jt'` m. — '"o``BTHST�,ti t. 'a'`:' p;lei aaw s p` _F��'a oar ?j 1f s '°'• `M 4t1, S rs k-. tl ,��z6TH JF , _ 6TH ST=13 ,x Q , ,1 /J I- d4-3 t l ! ""t N TH ST x • ,/ :� 5:� a;- - its a 1 LEGEND - 's ', oho 4' 4TH:ST O- — Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) 4 ��' .fi , it r . • Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) r I If �yt, • RD;ST--t 'A • Option 4-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall ' , , 1 ` W • . t: " A w --:a k f ft, 4 • }. y :, : CITY OF MIAMI BEACH /" C19 1 inch=600 feet N Feasibility Study Option 4 (147 Ac) °"S"`r°"TS Pity t°13��iR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,20eet Exhibit B APPENDIX E OPTION 4A: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 103 of 370 Exhibit B N (PROPOSED RIP-RAP II —PROPOSED PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC SEAWALL CAP SIDEWALK-REFER TO TOP EL 5.70 ROADWAY DRAWINGS IFM S 1 DETAILLS. PROPOSED TRASH RACK STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL— PROPOSED 32•ID FRP 60•ID FRP E INV EL-11.5 DUCT BANKS(REFER ...i RF,1••,T 9WlT) DISSIPATgt —PROPOSED PROPOSED WATER SOS EL-14.0 R.O.W.UNIT TO ELECTRICAL DNGS.) OVERROW PIPE({) PUMP STATOR --_T ———___'—__—— STRUCTURE INV EL-1.33 OVERFLOW PRT WELL TREATMENT UNIT(TP.) BOS EL-3.0 SOS EL-21.5 TBOSRE EL-26.0 120 55ll MP��PUMPS " -,. MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. a LEGEND: 32•ID FRP � •• -_- -__ _.— O i DISCHARGE PIPE(6) i( NV 0. 1.3J -- -I rTrn-rm r—— Tr,.-11 I BURIED ATI L•ULL J L 1 ... • - BURIED FPL • BURIED GAS • �I . \ / H• -- BURIED FIBER OPTIC --I `—DRAINAGE WELLS REFER — 'a TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. O -- RIGHT-OF--WAY M CATCH BASIN %•W DRAINAGE PIPE.REFER i0 I` ® CATCH DRAINAGE MANHOLE I /-� • DRAINAGE DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL rSTORM • TG yp 1. —.__ .1---. •*� - -CONCRETE co I W ® SANITRCATARY LEM RMA HOLE VJ Ir E h ��1 �rr...aaa 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE • --� .1 If .:• `f •'L I � �I_ I� wv. BACK FLOW PRE VENTER • ( I ffI-" • FIRE HYDRANT ' -- --- �C - IIA - • 0 W ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX v • mm -PROPOSED WET TM TO .tj cOx •� N 61 WA1ER MEIEk BOX �~ IL_ • . I n EAISRNG 12D.1.WATER I v • - - C y e • MAIN.MAINTAIN A MN. T I • N OF 6'CLEARANCE FROM I in n I .. --.-.- ..e. ( dL6 SANITARY SEWER al!00 I•I I NN�.�1 --� I•I Ta0l Lincoln R•ad } I ,I IIn n - P igi J .ee� 11- SANITARY M AD PROPOSED CAP SEWER AND MH y; — 1 N10 RESTRAIN dF REFER TO SAN. ci _ YF P SEWER sYn:Wm `M��W I I •w • / DRAWINGS I.. I / �H II ®I i / Iw • III z J FUTURE 135HP 60-ID PIMP / 112 PUMP STATION OVERFLOW PROPOSED G LI J//EDR MH SANITARY I VALVE(PIP.) SEWER MH TO REMAIN EXISTING FPL PROPOSED 12•WATER MAIN. DUCIBANK TO PROPOSED FIRE REFER TO WATER DRAWINGS ExISTING GPS LINE REMAIN FOR DETAILS. TO REMAIN 1 HYDRANT EXISTING SANITARY UNIT SEWER TO REMAIN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH '°D OPTION 4A ENG. K11•• RD .AGr. ENGMEEROFRECORD T ie Name OPT._01.Cwq STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION DIRECTORGFR RO COLETf91LE5 DESIGN ENGINEER.LT. gTY MAN. ROY COLET.P.E. CRANK 11•• .......1.1 Surveygym: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT °' nq��{ IL , SM,R Field�"' Pae: 1We`D`ON:.,e.,A. ,>INmK.ERrlu,calFRw ,Mn.9eAw,av,W PROP p �d SITE PLAN-PUMP STATION CITY ENGINEER'.wR.sax PERE,IACGEW.PE. souE AS NOTED RPFC Mo Mb ND%MME REVISION MPD.BY Dee 10/25/19 awvW►�o7 ua.9: Exhibit B -- — I —. N I • • I I FPL DUANK J OBE RELCTBOCA ED i u no oo DRAINAGE CONFUCT (SG.FOR 11'•1T atm O \STRUCTURE PROPOSED I T \ DRAINAGE INLET R.O.W.OMIT owoo }I LEGENDI 0 I u PROPOSED SANITARY Q SEWER AND MH BURIED ATT BURIED FPL BURIED GAS BURIED FIBER OPTIC O I PROPOSED ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK • --- RIGHT-OF-WAY CATCH BASIN F I CON RO PANEL EMERGENCY 0 STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE W EECTHCA P A FORM GENERATOR NB ATOS.9ET UNE ICADDNS 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE W 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE W I I / /_ � Exhibit B E D I n _ mo .f .o i---10 a 0., o o�a Cg m +m,•16w if m 7. SI __--__ -_US--_'f/1 co N U7 U) 0171 V7 1 -1 -1_ - I -2 t f i n 4 1 o L 171 I fill i 111 '�� i .. .....----a,.. _ 10 i, it ---12 4 �{I — — — �1-- 200 400 60 0 800 1010 1200 1400 1-6111V-1 800 20 0 2200 Station(ft) Page 106 of 370 Elevation(ft) d' . c "anarct„... .. " rlo f i''LR_TRASH STRUCTI k i ST-99 NI m F. "" ST-49 – J o o W o ST-47 17 - ST-45 ___- ''> ST-43 ST-41 -39 iiii -37 I ST 35 1. �ST-STT-34 32 iv o i 111101 1037 1 r. MH-1038 m 1 1N-1175 Slip o aST-31 o I' A 1.1 , \– ST-24 1 I �..,.t, ST-22 — ' ST-20 - = ST-19A ST-18 -OL7 1N-1128 §flg ST-14A ST-12111.11111111116 i S� ST-7 R I rip1 . . ST-4 ST-1 M x s _v CO Elevation(R) d.-:' -N J 1. N o J " - TRASH STRUCT1 ggTT pp ST-1 b6 14 N , oo I __ m an ST-95A o, i , 1 44 ST-94 w o 1„ ._ -__ 1 _ =' 51-92 ST9D o 1 I o ST-68 o', ST-84 1 IFo ra r _ _— ._ _ ST-80A co °7 ST-76 v - �' T'73 o _ ) i ST 71 �_-- ST-66A i ST 5 O L ST 1 1 a o am 0 o L T-59 � l 1. =— _ I ---- —— 1 T-55 1 — _- ST-53 m s no a CO o Exhibit B F U In Go � ' C•1 yl �( T d+- Q n .ff to CT n Uf r 1`RV n O -- N o QJ m N ^� 1 µ {ci.' '�jmir e v 7 T ri '7' eF7 <n�e-�}r+ o n N N N F ..eI'�^.�1 q { t0 'I- t GOV] t~n ',, t t V! t tt §L i 7!` 1 1 i- v~i v~1 �!1 � �'L g IC) IC;imU~i Ul 3\ — r 0 - r. a I 9 fs G w 7 e _ -10 i _ . ----------- -11 ---- Y-11 12 1i, 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 Station(ft) Page 109 of 370 Lni nuiL u • 11/ fi { ,., "� Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of `` r_1OTHS ,—� } 19TH STasia theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West • j `�„ p''t 4 is; ig: ,, �.�, - Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area __-'7,.5'''..4 • ilH , ` Opo�a\•J *�.�` ,r east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these 1" ' r . ` "* r 18TH ST 1 L results once drainage improvements have been completed _. .. 0 18TH ST ,,. .. _a L , throughout the entire area east of Alton Road. {t 18TH' g a + r '1'' -TT i111 w wit, mo ;, +� . '.Jf ','Z' ,Tc rl y NT- ' ft zc . • f • 1 1a i .s � � i�' �-.a of ''� - . ,! `w f Q ` , �,,...-- t+ �l •S11,7TH S•T= _ 'r, _ ?, — -'� _ a .p' 'rte ' 1't.„;.,--- ,ik,- .111 tt.trifib tr &') "-'ille- • moi:G �,: VENETIAN CSWY '" lii E' F 4 Iff_;° # rte• 111.• _,,,� „rNINCOLN mac,+ J i %-� vbr ,, x LINC•OLN RD �'. ..to o-.,• Rig ; m 'II r, . ..mss - LINCOLN LN F A ' if . LINCOLN.: a IFS © � 0 .�A w tv' 14',..-4 r„1r-la meq[ .'.1.ri. , 9 {}'.,y, r �...1 A C*.�F7� z I` ' 16TH STlin` 16THST .a, asc r _a. �aw,X �'._ 111411 0 1 m iilr'' �• � c.®-i �.-tea ae 11 ine, 1 1 15THTEfl�vat �:•` o n k oma • .. :T 44 6,. �. ' �I El E © 15�TH�ST_ ® s3 !'I{!UF "'PPI •• - � Tom" '!t rr�l `. a��'++ _7 01 � �`- �;q,;� {1 fq Q®a -4--1 Utz '$ t\.\ :�' ! ?: 1� iG "6 1 _ o B `� J �� ESPANOLA WAY_ . `#j '` - = fi c.. �' .i o o�sePt�oM MCA�1 ,Ir'."',/:-.74:, .; "' \\ sI �r4 � (� CTAiiii w = r14THPL. ! i•r. 0 ma i't \ Y r14THiTEER4; #I 0 _. o L � �. 491. `11A w rm. ETj 11 meg. q�u :�_:i ee '' ,-'% 14TH ST .i.� 14TN'ST�11y milk. o `�' ' ��ry �J G7 y i9 • 11.1 MolADTER Si, y.- atl i.nui ".E'a 13TH ST 1 . -kc4 .•'R i1 �+:". --—.13THST -oaq f.� r-- m vim '-1'rm '= - R� M ` tf - A ti- r 1 L •la «tom-,:. -. ...i.-.--iii, ��T .a r � Ei�' 12TH ST �a 12TH ST + Y �e }'":u "i'l '['i , c a zek? �� .1,-;•,,,, .1 M BISCAYNEBAY d �� a v./‘,/,..141A' m'' 11TH ST • --. 4 m1oa ", R'-''�': A .., . '11:. 4 7-4 i Iv,t1,-,,,' ;L--__ - :---1.1 -t'i'i. ".'" w'r' --'. C; .4: t ir.4 •• .,1,[11_ Iv- , 7, ,-- ' -...J.• R 'r ai ---Qki. .--, .‘ N Il di • ..-,t,*-. !_ :fir i ii a p.. .a �:'1a1 f t_ ;. .� ," aR o �tix 9TH ST ■ .... � ' i ,� W I . .. � � mow.MI � ii c�.awr gAM . 111 • ox • ., fore�r- Awal R BTHST :�"�l:+aLif�1l`" , .,. ,. ri 'S Komi?- -ate t o _yo no m� • i 1.47,1!! ,mss s - y F.- 0� itti m = .X o MO On Vii^ 4rr� '.h - '.1k1t{� ,4 x a, r. a . co °a'm -7TH ST ^ . , a,', ��,rJ. ,,... t d n �-n� r,a, m is 1 ,` .rile. s m C1 Li �'I L'P y� , i. . '* 6T{ST— �� a Y Ct ,r.-,BTHST (( i + 4 0 4 "44 r r�' a. 7' 'r' _ r r ail: o.. . _ ", ,Y i46THST '*• a LEGEND ra R r , -- r o Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) e„... / _r � ' • % Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) y0'p wf ,.. -"414 - 3RD,ST r4 a E [ LI Option 4A-5Y24H Max Flooding-7.5"Rainfall ` .- -� • r' 17 • CJI �"� 7Ir 111 • fl'"-- • - -`, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH n" C-e 9Feasibility Study Option 4A (147 Ac) A 1 inch=600 feet CONSULTANTS PaJ I l'( L411-IR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,20eet CAI IIUIL 0 : us 1 ; .' . a . .. ' r . 1! f� Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of RV a,i t. 1 1 ''' ' ,-_19TH S V 19THa theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West u;, e t *- --•,411$0 1 " . . ,: o �,,�- 11 Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area i :. r "5' V.+''". s,. a i; -I ' : east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these --s• j I&,3 - r -� s. -; results once drainage improvements have been completed . 1T!Ld. ` 18TH.Si ry• y 'w 18TH' throughout the entire area east of Alton Road• 2l ' • le- r I ":ri11Sh yy .L ,,T,';) 17zI i v:., , 1 W yl r VENETIAN CSW �' '-'�r VIP. � • io4 .� 1��• - , i ,- 1 .` o , � 1-ISI 1 _,� ;1111�.. .'4A N LINCOLN LN ;` .. . '�; f�"„e ,Iaall ■ X LINCOLN RD — mem. •a r 1! r-- .� LINCOLN LN • M `� ■ !j o Ss ., o yew ., r.. r k ' Waw A L.-- —* r: 1•6TH ST 0 ac_ iir ` /�'% 16TH ST IA '. ...'! �Ht ; 'P-: iki r .1' -15TH TER�77II{ Ml - -ii �— n� gs` `—tis-' ,.;,i;.� r 4 r. _it 441 (( Un 2w -� -T 7. d -.. b. , - L ..1 ' 1 15TH ST J� i� 1 If'NC "`` L 'L ' +'� ^tlt «II Off., '—��, n GE LiuLA,, � gam- F,— 1; :r.4 'WIN �Y i�'�.r.:�FI. o : ma M En El ESPANOLA WAY l �\ h:�'';•4: ".TH.C�� o =' 14TH PL • r m \11.45§; •,_ -a is' 1 _ �14 fl -��`ia , ;_ mss•:'. r .„ , r 14TH TER *I � r.�'z o lh- . r , '4i Bi \- r, llli�a_-illi 14TH S��T r,a, 14TH-ST i .... ,� Id m: cr rr . 1i n �ilq i■ YrZ � tt si rt'F.7* .o 1. �'1 m l/It JJ•�r 3 7 i MONAD TEB *. �, "n�` .`" " ` 13TH ST �t °r �, +`� `i. �,I: 13TH ST ., n - . __ c 'i -! .Lr,i ` `,,cg i 40 A. gY 511t::: •iu — SP LC s "7 'T qi.. b. .'.44401.44 T' i 1 IMF] ,�t,``,�rr,#C_ i .' , Wn- ...ice '► _ s x V^ � nr -12TH ST D T..12TH ST r j'- - ;4` z P y' • 1:104:iA:In ` a4 yr / _ 11TH ST y. . R a G: +* 5: lig- . t P'.' r _ P--- -II w.. caiJ!t-r¢ '.^�r IeI `t _ ®a mal - 1 o- - a*e.... �I y.. ... 1 ® ! gi � `j��.� � �Ji:s r� s.r4 _ � vy g�17CC++ ..., t.1 I �lOD hL� r ri Ea :_i . r=. ;It® sw 4., - 4 �1 i Pali 3 J ttl o WITH'ST,.r-F t.-tk�..if'�.J m ��ss C� _ _-r.—= �a 0i�4V 4:. L. -r = n.' l b.T...-oar ;'m l �.l . y rev�- -`1 • . -.r-.arm.• A , w '4 z 7 DRi• z An, 3 `", , T . . i m r o 1 Z ;, ® :a u-� 7TH ST 3 t • _i 01."4t 11' •, �.tc.- - -D.P a:u.. �11.a -� r, ' -2 ,/! IST {c r i 1 ,r I: f ,.,•,rt r. :,.., ,,,,- ,.... _, - —.' . • • ti A Q ., LEGEND u Y , At —' r .r *' ,t4TH:ST l_ � _ Offsite Eastern Area Sub Basins(453 Acres) 'q - z Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) 1 ..$, • - 3RD_ST , T Option 4A 10Y24H Max Flooding 8.75"Rainfallilt: i 1 .' l� r4 ,_„ , a , "A L '_�. 4 : -:• i CITY OF MIAMI BEACH n" C19 Feasibility Study 0 tion 4A (147 Ac) A 1 inch=600 feet °"`°`Ta" ' P JYi< L411-IR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,200 Feet Exhibit B APPENDIX F OPTION 5: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 112 of 370 Exhibit B N � I I 1 1 I 1 1 PROPOSED(25-0•X 15'-0•)EQUIPMENT V » PLATFORM.CONTROL PANEL.SCADA.RTOI• / III IS'µR r IT•van) • I ATS.AND PFD EQUIPMENT. FPL PROPOSED 3 PROPOSED FUTURE VAULT O 3'-0• GENERATOR I./ • n—B' III ' I. m Vb ID re. -` OSED NEW'�i A:CUTTEI{t T7MTIi ±/ W ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE W ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1 ___ -.__ TREATMENT PROPOSED I Z .®• ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 1I -� -z• STRUCTURE T2•RCP V� 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE �� v_ STORM W BACK FLOW PREVENIER PROPOSED STORM VIRE HYDRANT 21-10 I I `..° DvSANITART WATER STRUCTURES-- N ® CABLE Tv COMMUNICARON BOK .. I o M WATER METER BOY .... • _I++a ( rr^- SEWEF MANHOLE ,dl'V" � In 1- TIP { _. �PROPOSED nl � 310 00 1 I J)E00 Coln Road SEWER 310000 a f r I ry Lincoln Road ; a IJ PROPOSED SANITARY N ` SEWER d I 1 H Y) H \\ is I W `STASH RACI( 0 FUS. STRUCTURE I Z PUMP INTAKE HDPE 't DISCHARGE I' TREASTRUCAENT TURE TT �� HDPE STRUCTURE .. -- BY-PABS RPE I.,� EwSnNG S31 RElIv I I� MANHOLE TO REMAIN DISSIPATCP g 1 STRUCTURE I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �� 'BtlBp O9 OPTION 5 orrECA.A1wGER JIMMY L MORALES ENG OF RECORD_,LAMA ENGINEER OF RECORD F,ue Name e e^ce�I R STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION N EMGREER ,.T. CSS COY COLEY,P.E. DRAM BY Survey Re PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ""E' p q cnecKER JR F.ea COw Page _ vW,KOrdef M1ss1a PROPS��D SITEPUIL CITY ENGINEER NELsaN FERE,mexedE.Pe E AEAskrLIO tt I ",i1.i," wdM��IA1 W OOIP,eO..O«„N1eRetae.t to a�,.� L`'AN•PUMP STATION _ SCA,-E_ _ IED a FEO No.4 NO DATE REVISION -REPORT Date ,0/SS/1S sheet rAsA ss OPTS 01 Exhibit B MATCH LINE STA.69+75(SEE SHEET OPTS 03) HI '.. ,, I _ m W w Q PROPOSED I72"NA RCP _-__ (ma NM,I-a,T sow) �' G1DPM DRAINAGE 0 I — p I .I 1 0 ' LEGEND' Ill I - BURIED ATT W EXISTING ATT LINE - -- BURIED FPL S I C BURIED GAS 1/3 \ c.--. ��PROPOSED WATER +3 BURIED FIBER OPTIC N D A I(1 MAIN — RIGHT-OF-WAY W \V °� I I i k • CATCH BASIN CO r W I PROPOSED s SANITARY SEWER 1 III, ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE In 1. I 31 I I ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE +N I ///---EXISTING WATER —FPL DUCT BANK r ...Ay TELEPHONE MANHOLE / MAIN AW00 i r"- BACK FLOW PREVENTER / ]10;00 CO I I I_ A. IR[sEp. I ` I I O FIRE HYDRANT T -_" - CABLE TV COMMUNICAPON BOA M I / I I Lincoln Road _. :�, M WATER METER BOP Q 8 d W `_ Z • iii_ a▪ I =his _ _ � I �� F. __ __—__ __ __—__ A III — _—__ I - _ 1 I'i`k -�I�-r-Nh-,�it t{�,.,.. -.i,�.-,7 l "JfT . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH 00BUB020 OYCO ENG OF BNGINEERGFREGGRD Nem. OPTION 5 oPTS_G1.e.R CITY MANAGER'JI MORALES DESIGN ENGIHEER.rIJ� STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C-OS JT Suety Reference C-OS DIRECTOR ROY caEY PE scar PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' p t4 AIL CITY ENGINEER JR 1 a,n.iJ. aNATru FbM ma Paw. raw ole...�.m,a IXW00'EWR20C E"°"NEEWE'NG"'"."."" PROP6�Ed SI PLAN-PUMP STATION ER:MBsw,PMFz.1E00 P.escALE AS NOTED IS ND,;>o,." _NO DATE REVIEroN ' APP BY oe., to/1Snv she.; D,,,M,,,.. °PTO n Exhibit B LI _ L I U _.--U I fo-.e FOA„•.,Y sl¢n POW - --I -- I ––—– .► N _ - L.__ tie, T _- ' a ' r, _._._ BURIED ATT �u- _ I� rx _ ' - - . ___ - __ d . ..I_.. a �.c � '.. i . .. d r` RIED FPL __-._-.�Y-,_, -�. ....._ .m.s; �,...:_ _. A y.L -.TS..�_-_,.._ 0 _._x _"_-" BURIED GAS 0 - �- _._ e.F. Ac _ _- BURIED FIBER OPTIC r -. - r —- RIGHT-OF-WAY -- "- - �1�1�1�� W HE CATCH BASIN W I I W 0 STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE 1 - - AZW� 0 SANITARY SORER MANHOLE 1 - - - .... PT s rW 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE W p W OO TELEPHONE MANHOLE W P S ORM DPAINAGE PROP S ORM�DR2 NAGE 10 BACK FLOW PRESENTER L D PRE HYDRANT _ Ray Road ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX EXIST.FPL PROPOSED J ,�y N M WATER METER BOX LI PROPOSED DUCT BANK SANITARY SEVER LTD WATER MAIN +s' �I n L Q I - r—} — — _ t\ — 1 f > W 1. W -" - I H � J I J , _ — - -- - J -- ---- -r^ : I F - -�- ROW Ti f I\ 2 I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH �D OPTIONS 06 o,RELROT COLEYP E GEa,IMMYLMDN�Es END OF REGDRD—JAG. ENGINEER OF RECORD Flo Name OPTS_UJ Owg STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION DEOR IM EER.I. . �� NMNINNEL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ND p 1t�LT��IL ,,, CH O 'R BOO :D 1 OH/XrnC OAOHIOi FNM 000 I>ape w GOND LEAIY ISumAEN..COOFA CONE,YAW PEKIN ELMO. PROI d .D SI TE PLAN-PUMP STATION .. - CITY ErvcwEEa.NELSON PERFz,WcoME,vF. 01NOE AS NOTED R No DATE REVISION DA„y,R._OR6 Ol Exhibit B *\\\\ a ��z I OVERHEAD- ATLANTIC BROADBANDI yP 5 o ,6„.„). OVE LI I +1 1' FIBERNERTHDIRECT �J � I ROW 1 Ii h ‘ CRON me coNTROL PT4IFORLEGEND:NG- 'ev -. I - _.ry -AT.. .. `\ \ -n_ — --- io Loc o� 1------- - 19H_ 1JSHP PUMP 'I• \ k i ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE U) I �•-1 q 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE W ( I ELECTRICAL MANHOLE PROPOSED Jr RCP PROPOSED SANITARY ' ll-J \ ` \ TELEPHONE MANHOLE W STORM DRAINAGE SEWER TO BE RELOCATED TRASH RACK t- ._—� . .....F� FIRE HYDRANTSTU �., I-'® CABLE TV COMMUNICATIONCS▪I WATER METER BOX Bay Road I.I\ DISSIPATOR . STRUCTURE PUMP WET DPL NL �1. ‘� -‘ Z PROPOSED .� `\ WATER MAIN JJJ FIIEAUERT UNIT _. ,=_. 1 F - -- -T--_— -,r----71�----��-- 20%0 GENERATOR I.' \. I -- J --I ROW � I . I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - — NBOOTHIIOm'. 5 ENG G.OF RECORD . ENGINEER OF RECORD. File Name OPTS_OM.Eng STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION COS CITY MANAGER.JIMMY MORALES DESIGN ENGINEER Survey . upNECTOR. �TCIXET.P.E. CRAMBY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0E' U/IL e.. e. CNECKFA 'R W,e.RN FeM Bco4.___ Page 1MMEORO Mneme. p �{ l7 CITY ENGNEER-LELSOHPFJEZ.MCOIE.PF. N. PE oT/M/w „°°`°""`""M""""""�'""°"�"`".""„° PROP�� TE LAN-PUMP STATION sale ASNOTED R _NO DATE— REVISER App..By 'O,ea 10/25/+9 s,,,a,. a,,,,W oirs w Exhibit B D 40, Q CSis\ ol ul �co co co�CI)CO r ��col co co r cnI -1 – 2 -- -3 ,.., 5 Mgr kl 41 . / t Ili,-- ', , . - . .,---.,...„.I. .,.,„ .... °t41111016.,C.44P ��i W r -1 1 i 1� 200 400 600 000 — 1000 1200 1400 16 0— 1800 2±0 22 -1 — 00 Station It Page 117 of 370 Elevation(R) d;,- _. .c;,1., N1-o—N u,.R_TRASH_STRicn ST-102 ST-102A F_1§A o ,ST-99 1A a) o m 0 Ea' o ST-49 a w o I ST-47 ST-45 41181,1114. ST-43 T-41 ST-39 II -37 ST-35 i ST-34 o :ST 32 `.N-1037 57. "" MH-1175108 " g 111191P. i A N ST-31 o r II 1 11,114 \ . 1 I ST-24 ST-22 o ST-20 ST-19A ST-18 -n VI�1 o^ ± ,_ -IN-1128 §frig ST-14A ST-12 1 cn' T-7 o i o II -6A ST-4 ST-1 m x a o l CO 0 Exhibit B D i mm s m ao .g, n n n .><n .n .o ' CM F` —qtr HT �r ► r CM v, m 1nm LOW GO m vim u m co o 1 1 - -3 r -4 VII It -5 c 1 w - i !s I -11 -_---- -11 -12 ------- ---- i 11 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Station(ft) Page 119 of 370 Elevation(11) d�N = .cn1"2'^' o N LR TF2ASH_STRUCT1 ST-99 sT-49 O � 1 ST-45 W 1 ST-43 ST-41 T-39 -T-37 15T3 x31 ST-32 ill N-1037 .'MH-1038 IN-1175 o' ST-31 EI ii I ST-24 ST-22 ST-20 ST-19A ST-18 i �Y : IN-1128 § 3 ST-14A ST-12 101111ST-4 ST-1 m x v CXfIDIT 6 ,i1 re in.., Disclaimer.This map displays the modeling results of I1d. •' I t: 19TH STS+"'; • r ;j 19TH S a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West ' '1 „lair..t, nt �, ' .'., • . Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area 1 maiitikkitt.ig...3 Imp t 1. • EO.l y =. east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these a U..3 •* .i o }. results once drainage improvements have been completed o 16TH..ST r r 18TH ST ,, iBTH throughout the entire area east of Alton Road. y �o„,,s, .i . ,mss 4- • • t .'ofd r A F w sat , p ; 0e , . ,r _. w°• . -'. • Ei11TH STf .w t:1!)11' F - w -cv _ a r i'�w Atrl _• ma.I� g4s. �ii��w .N LN }a a, T•. i �f _: i., t � �N LINCOLN #� E �" z:."�. ""a. • .air 3� X .....LINCOLN RD �� •f.- - ^•-�--� r- �A�4,.loft gna as i�"�— C� !' rte. ---- LINCOLN LN_ * ' ,► :rill CI o .., - , .— ... w,• -, .. -- ' + 16TH STOa 16TH ST ®,� ocm.o . .», 4 r `1 .. 15TH TER.vas. S 8 ^'t. © ,�, _©obi G.. f 39'2 ,-I, • „. e1. --%lailril ., .-!- i Q Cl!® w.>� 15TH ST o I N l I I II ILC "P.. �- `o s, I• . y- -Ili .,fir'.AEE, ® - 01 DE, � 1310. 1 ! L 114,\ - , - .0 'ilril ,V, - 0 � PH4)t4J41 EM c, t • .¢ : (+ '� Q ;,MONAD TER 7 �^ 13THSTl� lid 11 , t ,_'''''''°_;%11-.13TH ST yoab CI Si �c i1; V ` id =, �I..s 12TH�, c�3' �I s ll' TIM WM T � .moi * � ` V111.108 F,�nny� S0 R„ 12TH ST t t ;.„4..,,,s, ,.._. , .c,i M=1,•,- _,. ...;,, - • 'alliii.... ‘ 1 BISCAYNE BAY 4i1/4', J ~ a -- `4' • i 11TH ST a r �_ 0 'n -Z -:, 4 t.. a riLii4 - t• 1•at®tl tt Pp 1 ,-� — _Tr .=1 , r + q gra ..;.: �' ,F ;r. w 43B . - ;' r Xi '-� 10THST_, d k...t.l. - :IN__,;,"11 lie - ww'2" Le, ai.-;.:, ..,... ,gAR 'T - 4 0, to qty-Alt-NN oil 9TH ST wd ■ j, 11 , $ a s!^ G., a A, r- +a ry. -,�. " yl ! d - 'a.`.,�r • m.0, G a.. ; " y Awir o -• STS f•�i,t �r *-a �` - -m � ' lir —:.i - • !_�R�B r. ' 1- .�Mae flw y Pa 64,o ' ^ i Iwo r �� rth '- 6F1 , •z og ,sill ray„ °•^,�, X11 0 " :_; r.M.T. k....-El ;,,:ii" ', , r 7TH ST 2 s , - .2,7,‘- ;' ; ' i. ..mom? at +- ,-liri, fi.5 6TH ST u a s :7 u z 0 g pj . h 6TH ST W as�• - m Ira 0 ` MO V N a. Y- '5TH ST -,u.g. `. - �, - LEGEND 1�� n - �1 o n. •�i. n �.-., 4TH:ST I. o Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) q ' ,,6 i',--Ir.- ' _n ,r - Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) #.4' 1'• ..ed ' "t` • '�`, z r - •"" ' .3RII ST + , • ,1 E Option 5-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall , •• ..' $ r I h w l" f- o .� - -- t. t1r- . .a , -....; '!. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH n" 9 Feasibility Study Option 5 (147 Ac) 1 inch=600 feet n CONSULTANTSP1�l''zl o s4QHR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,200et Exhibit B APPENDIX G OPTION 6: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 122 of 370 Exhibit B N LEGEND: 12'e6'ELECTRICAL PLATFORM PROPOSED FOR SAFETY SNITCHES II BURIED All RIP-RAP T.0.5.EL BH' _._-_-.___.-._.. r.. BURIED IS ...._.... .. _- -.- , B RED:AEI '. —PROPOSED PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC SEAWALL CAP SIALL a•e B R EU FLH OP I ITOP EL 5.70 —__ RIGHT-OW ( ATI ID FRP PUMP TRASH RACK p STATION OVERROW STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL CATCH BASIN DISSIPATOR E INV EL-11.5 DUCT BANKS STORM DRAINAGE NANHU r STRUCTURE ]2-ID FRP WET WELL WATER TREATMENT BOO EL-14.0 R.O.W.LIMIT MACE Rn IT E 11 �T) © SARI SAN TART SEWED MUSHO ROW PIPE(4) BOS EL-21.5 UNIT(TTP.) INV EL-1.33 BOS EL-28.0 I O EIEC BICAL MANHOLE _—..- __ 101:0_51g PUMPA_ 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE FLOW N ...n. B C 0105 COMMUN FREE/ENTER TION II rlrrr-a;m A --�Tr�� i RU FILE A .._.. / • —_ — • W ER MEIER BOK L111L_—J L--.111L__I F riQs.... I DISCHARGE (BJ DRAINAGE WELLS O IIII 96W DRAINAGE PIPE - FliOr �� '_'I �mr l CMFJWF RETE • , W 111111111111111 iiaL i „ in W ILI CD r. -R fi' —I�I"00 Lincoln Road + 1 fiL _. YFL�f�Al �..- - ill C P AND IIT.."-'-----':,.�' RE¢1, �r • 1L 1� ~ j u�- Aa / W ii I/_— ,, z i J V 60 ID PUMP / ----_ —_ OVERFL / r OVERFLOW a I BA .�_ ��.>` / PROPOSEDNKS /(] ELECTRICAL DUCT 32'FLAP - EXISTING SANITARY //////////// VALVE(TTP) SEWER MH TD REMAIN _ \ _._ EXISTING FPL PROPOSED 12'WATER MAIN -EXISTING GAS LINE DUCTBANK TO RE., ERE HYDRANT R.O.w. EXISTING SANITARY LIMIT SEWER -- 1 — — — - 1450 LINCOLN_RD.. _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMIBEACH MINNOFNOOD OPTION 6 ENG OF RECORD. ENGINEER OF RECORD FIM Name OPT5_01 E.9 CITE MANAGER.ROY EY.PE ICN ENGMEER:�. STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C-OS SDP,wrwa.. Y ROY MO P.E. ORAV10Y PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT uTu. P �f�IL LXRECTGR CHECKER. LR 1 IF ARV. WIWMT Flea Book: PNw. WLaKOmw.No.M 10p COXYEM11O1�"ER FMB NMI B6`G'.a'11° PROP( D TE'PLAN-PUMP STATION crtv ENGNBER NB.soN PEl�z-ncurE.P.E NoN,La AS HORTW f.I.DNeMINE N. he Ste,. ._ NO MUTE M REVLSgN APPD.BY wn5 olne o1 Exhibit B N I LEGEND I I 11 J W I 4f= BURIED ATT L n - BURIED FPL 1 - 1 i „ - - BURIED GAS M I BURIED FIBER OP11L ` J Ty II - RIGHT-OF-WAY I o s DRAINAGE / ! n(m u FUR II' T HELY IN CATCH BASIN V • 'N E' R.O.W.UMIT ID STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE C _- __ -_ _- _- __ _ 0 r, ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE el CAL MANHOLE ✓ 17 1I M O TELEPHIONE MANHOLE C � H N �I ® CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX _i'P c CONDUIT IO J TO BE REMOV➢ {O ® WATER METER BOX 11.G( PROPOSED EEC RILL _ .. I O 1-I MH k DUCT BANKS IW INxCOMMUNICATIONS I III ' LINE TO REMAIN l yl W W W W SAM.TAR Y SEWER i y 111 P I EXISTING WATER MAN- - 318,00 319+00 tv1 Lincoln Road 1.r L — �I a 1- 1- - :. J Li7Tri __. -- -- R.O.W.LIMIT \ -_- 14(1(1 1 INd )!N Rn. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IOAIXRHIXA. ENO.OFRECORD...Lea. ENGINEER OF RECORD. OPTION 6 F«Nrm OPTB_ORA, JVA I�1 f� RECTOR ER RO COLEY PEES OESIGN E GINEER�� STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CSS CITE , survey RON.= V DIRECTOR ROY COLEY.PE BY 'li .. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ME. f� " INWmr«EN,KN CARLE.OPNE.114.1N SFACK E,ver PROIP'aidiinE'PLAN-PUMP STATION """""' cin ENGINEER NBsw vERFz,MCGEME.vE �� '1.1"saRE. AS NOTED NPEM No OM -��t0�M"....T, FNM Bock_ ENB VbS Or. N1w1.R NO OATS REVISION AVPO MR DI,N:1D/n/19 BI,e,, - o.,.b. ons os Exhibit B ---_..--- ---- - - - - --- - ---- - --- -- ---__ _------_. PROPOSED 16-FT __.---T335LINCOLNRD --- LINCOLNWESTT ------ -- --_-- PROPOSED 16"0 DIP INTERNAL DIAMETER I FOR DRAINAGE HELLS SEOMENTAnON TANK °115 PROPOSED 16-FTt I to INTERNAL DIAMETER PROPOSED CONCRETE NET WELL R STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE WELL R.O.W.LIMIT ___- .. (S.AEsox-ss•..IV SPUD R 15 co N SPTD CONCRETE R CLARE FOR DRAINAGE WELL D a. d p� O FI F W I W ISTORM WATER J I I ^ DRAINAGE - H ly W W v. M -ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK W LIGHTINGBE CONDUIT yE I/�- 'A xe� -.TY?, - —BURIED AT&T CORRIDOR Yv Y, }rye,,, TO BE REMOVED -EXISnN 0 / e+ + 32..OD 3A40U SANITARY SEWER-J }22E N T Lincoln Roa �rl N dl .... a y▪ „rw: m aN FPL DUCT BANK J CAS LINE I WATER MAIN W Z' UGNTIN0 CONDUIT Z J TO BE REMOVED j 2 1 V I a g 2 I II `-R.O.W.IIYIT LEGEND: i BURIED Ali .., BURIED FPL BURIED GAS BURIED FIBER OPTIC —--— RIGHT-OF-WAY Si CATCH BASIN O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE S ELECTRICAL MANHOLE o TELEPHONE MANHOLE wIR. BACK FLOW PREVENTER TY ® IV CO BM FIRE H NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CABLE TV COMMUNICATION B il WATER METER BOX ��IAMIBEACH OPTION 6 OFRECORD...Ah. EMGNEEROFRECORD RMN.me 0Pl6_03UWg CITY MANAGER ROY CL EY IT SIGN ENGINEER l T. STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CIS „ starer MAIM.: il: pp ��55��ff V V DRECTOIi. ROY COLEY P.E. -6.T.- CRAM BY: FNM Book Ppe: M.ONM'.mewFN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT R PROP 17' f /IL "e1A""I CITY ENGINEER NELSON FERE,MCIWW.P.E cNEGxER: 'R BOK T 0500/H DW TRA ,mu OrAEN.AMCRnEFCNNE WM.,.RUIN *CAN-PUMP STATION sT�R1E AS NOTED NO DATE 00032321 AM)131' we I0/25/19 MWeI nwxW: 0•76_09 Exhibit B MATCH LINE STA. 145+50 (SEE SHEET OPT6_05) I 1245 LINCOLN RD. N F WEBS CONDO PROPOSED CONCRETE I STRUCNRE FOR DRAINAGE WELL 1 1 6LEI WATERTIGHT ELECTRICAL ACCESS MH (WAS FOR II".,T PUT) I• '1,1°I MIT > \ a a VI ——___—_____—_._...—,-___...._m OI ID d WI3 a Cl) , W I 1 m ii :)SI Uu 321a00 _ - - moo N , _. - - _ E �, 1. 1 -_ N Lincoln Road aI 1 1 NI W 44 2 F0...„A„. ___— _—_._.—_ R.O.W.OMIT ` I d''i LEGEND: BURIED AU BURIED FPL BURIED GAS BURIED FIBER OPTIC ———— RIGHT-OF-WAY In CATCH BASIN O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O ELECTRICAL MANHOLE O TELEPHONE MANHOLE .ars. BACK FLOW PREVENTER TJ FIRE HYDRANT INCABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX R WATER MEIER BOX NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OPTION ENO OF RECORD—� ENGINEER OF RECD STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C-es °TY MANAGER JIMMY L.MORALES oe ENGINEER�T. MIAMI BEACH Te_os a.9 °RECTOR'. ROY COIEY.P.E a.m.oY-. 1.T. 10/25nce PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ME p 1 OFLE E". NOG Order m"®' trmmmMmXma3AARO MW SFROF FL PROP EO � IL LA.V.LVA.1 OILY ENGINEER NR.40N REREZ.MLQE.PF. C"EC ,.R ABAATEYWB.PE 5 oAND SINATRA LAN-PUMP STATION - - - AS NOTED ft RFC"°.TANI NO DATE _ REVISION APPO.BY Dale /1S BNeat._ D,W,,,,,g OPT6_04 Exhibit B I OGRE Fm„•.Ir MEM ..I f- ,---------, _— ! I i i I T T- LEGEND: O R.O.W.UNIT BURIED ATT m� I I f rr BURIED FPL .`—� y 6x6 WATERTIGHT � ---em - BURIED GAS y ELECTRICAL ACCESS MH 1. "---i•.ve BURIED FIBER OPTIC --y----1--------- -- -----�---- �— ----------- ----_ ---� RIGHT-OF-WAY III • CATCH BASIN r.v... _ _ _ i�.• r _ STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE Ir .- -...0 - -«u „c 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE W-- _ - >E%ISTING STORM WATER il/ DRAINAGE .Rn. BACK FLOW PREVENTER ® FIRE HYDRANT CABLE iv COMMUNICATION BOX A -.-------EXISTING WATER MAIN U WATER METER BOX West Ave I 146400 141100 1417-700 •. SANITARY SEWER la 1 Z J ,.. BURIED UGHTING PROPOSED ELECTRICAL- - Z L CONDUIT TO REMAIN DUCT BANK 0— I kAINA,L f -- -- IOF.-,r^,I N. i'h_-,, - '‘ tGRAINAGE i MAIN T 7671 T AVE. .� T--- �,R.G.W LIMIT MATCH LINE(SEE SHEET OPT6_06) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION iptl6d°1p0D OPTION 6 ENG.OF RECORD: .. ENGINEER OF RECORD: PG N.m.'.OPT6-05.E•0 CITY MANAGER JIMMY L.MORALES DESIGN ENGMEER�� j STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION Desp DR BU DG Er.PB ANNEAL BY: JT Bunw R...... PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' pP 1l��77��{i-;9y1L CITYENAWEER:NeeWPEIF,Mm.e,WIN. CHECKER. JR ,�,� I m/uria rTrxL FNM GCE Py.:— Mk Order m„°,M 1pO`DNWIVON`EXT`R OF."'"'"BEP41.`L.M. PROPd DSITE PLAN-PUMP STATION SCALE. AS NOTED S.11.! NO DOTE REVMIN APP'D BY rom. 102_f_./_-___19 1100.0_- Dawrrq: orfs 05 Exhibit B MATCH LINE-WEST AVENUE(SEE SHEET OPT6_05) 671 176VE. - Row.uwr ® ��-r �� \ aGLE FORr,n-SAM) / ((�j _ LEGEND: BURIED ATT BURIED FPL / L' ' ,+3 BURIED GAS Itj� \ BURIED FIBER OPTIC /� Cl" I \ \ -- RIGHT-OF-WAY / 11114 \ • CATCH BASIN �� COHTRM PAHFL ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE / \ .NE1.ECTRICAL PLATFORM ® SE RARY ICAL MASEWENR HOMANHOLE \ &H' \ / / ® LE O TELEPHONE MANHOLE \ \ / \ . BACK FLOW PREVENTER FIRE HYDRANT / ® GABLE T COMMUNICATION BOX \\ ((( / N// \ O WATER METER BO% . / 7 f II GENE CY /GENEPA SET / / \ \ \ SLAB EL .66P / / ' FPL vain V i F.F.EL 4.ZB't \ \ \ '' / 'I \ \ �/.. , // IN .., \ i ,......„ N\ ..., .,, ,.. / _.,.. \ N, ,/ / , �� / / .. ,. \ N . N �, ,, „, - , �vN, , OTT OF MIAMI BEACH N CITY OF MIAMI BEACH /' / .. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH / 02-3233-0IT-00 \\ FOIJO 02-3233-017)1Q20 %� POLIO 02-3233-017-0060 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r h ,.-,r . 'CR1 1000 OPTION6 BIT ENS OF RECORD . ENGINEER OF RECORD He N,��e ours os a.g STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION Ce9 YiAAMAGER.RIMY L.MOR s DESIGN E"SI"EER�'7` RDrvey Reference p�L7e ��qq��ff y gRECfgk ROY COLEY.P.E. DRAM BY PUBLICWORKSDEPARTMENT RIOT ANHOLECKEROrder VVork-PUMP STATION o HATE REVISION R 10/23/19 oPre o6 Exhibit B FPL METER 1 e.DD' rl G■I1 E1EV.B.N' 3.N'• • GROUND � L.� 11 Ill-1 111 m Iu III 1267 6.00' Q SECTION SCALE:1.42' CCNEC110N Box st_a. 8.0 7 I� '_I I ■ i+I' . � Y 1 UT -1.I - 868 SECTION scue 1•-z' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION "f'YemHOC° OPTIONS ENG.OF RECORD 169ENGINEER OFRECORD FneName:OPT6_OY.tlwq CRY M4IAGER'.JIMMY L.LORRIES DESIGN ENGINEER:.I,j STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION ,T DIRECTOR ROT COLEY,R.E. CRAM 9r R°rww: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Mll£: Page 129 S ILCHECKER CRY ENGINEER xE 40NRflEZ.VCOME PE LE - AS 60T, nlsc xP nas. 01nano 56100r Fula Book: Page won..m+wa.<. Ice oo.rErv.�ox aNTeP OP Ne P.P. «.a3a,.A 9 SGNO GATE REVISION APP ay wb 10/05/10 sn , a.„,ft OPTS 07 Exhibit B 0 D x' �Q�Q o d uQi r CV m r -` m rf cm rT on "'+ co in 1 — 1 — r o 1 — — -1 PIIIIIIMIIII -2 -3 -4 -5 —' o 1 w • -- Ai 11 t., -1 i' — -1 -1:1- -1LI- -1% 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Station(ft) Page 130 of 370 Exhibit B E „3 r co z' c,n ga a \\,7 s 01., 0 VIC, n-01 Ls, E 1 a ‘-`,..r.- .-. gbC0 * ''' " 0 g CO 2 .4 C...1 II, CO , '- .1- 1,4" a a rn rr rClenc.-, =•-,-- ""14,7 E OJ Cs.$ CJ .. - ...- 7.--;77-_- , 7 7 i i k E,. EL i L i L 1-... H-- co w 0 V) f.0 • cn cn crxn _4 cn ,0-0:0 cn G) Ni-- - -—-- ---- 7„./7 \Of\ __ -\\___ I ' _______ _ _ __________________ I ' \ L.,. — I 0 , . . , -1 ii t 1-.I. .: -- ...,. '1 , 1 , , . 1 1 i , E i 11' i il i , I I 4 1! I 1 I g..- I I' ,.._. -. ___ _ . __ .________. I ', 1 S.' '1 'i 1 I CU- 1 II - -: I I '1-1 1 __- __z_____.-- .-_._ ---I 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 Station(ft) Page 131 of 370 LAnwil V rr t t , 4 Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of I. 7'" 19TH ST T -19TH,S a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West r 1 t.. , ,_ ` �r4 __ .r: Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area + r• ° �w% ` ,.•._ ..+ ! . east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these LL � � l'‘'.-- �a ` 1 t , results once drainage improvements have been completed _ i,, v 3 18TH Si a P•• 111TH ST 1 Z. - 1«+! throughout the entire area east of Alton Road P. •''I ` 1. 18TH' m r. �/ LLL - 7.1r,-. ,., ..k , - .F, o,►r '_ lui4i • Qp 1 47 4- r „ is t t r jilt • c 1.. r �® Z zt eza *t17TH'ST' ' � .w Itis P V.1.. i W Alla, .wa1 '' ice- ' r VENETIAN CSWY i q,T�11Ita_e `" t J ill --, r �0 , .U'$ tus _ w.t L. N LINCOLN LN a r,. t'' E-.,JV "" -X� x LINCOLN_80 ,� 1w1..� .y-•Ar-; r- --z � o LINCOLN ... ., ■ s' LINC9LNdER:� ■� ©rteilE `� �'"` =� �' • f' - 15TH STA ='t"' • �� 15Twp H �x ti-.r { - 9e - °°t te _ _# ,,...�� . 1-- t ziiGGlit !� - �'" 1� � l 15TH TER��F ia o WI 7a......, ate` `�� +nom Y. ,'.' '' s. 00 0 11-11 15TH ST !! ! I E i1C r ne ri ' . ; -' t.fr,Irrri roar.17t It., -_==1,, . I] op z M, '� b�J If _ �� ` QESPANOLf.A1WAYTh ,- _ ' ' 1 IrL1�- (i' 14TH CT T °d,o, MI5 .. . mm,-dL 1 y `Y 1 FøTHi .J ��+ �ql. • sPI 14THTER ["i • mm�'" T P. p ati—,..ti r„ 14TH Sb a�a 14TH'ST" ..i,..,4- ,..i.,......,.,..., .. o a �'� . r v aar ,a; �. r c E! i -1'1 , ■ SCJ 4.4.-� � 5r a MONADaTERv•;3613THST yW �'::_r_ 13THST o "-I y, e..mm i�. Pr 30 �4 . come 1, 9�' �e .tet ,: • gik.el - 12TH ST O � 12TH ST ; t t'`; �� ,o BISCAYNE BAY �J0:4 •_ 11TH ST •• "4 .=. r—a ls�i�1we- {I' Iii ), I ILIA !`�Bd tJ�: - a�;� _ji m C'ra'm, 014 N it.�t. ?" �s iii , -. Aff: c torn^ , ' 10TH ST �` c�- -! 1W § , Mg os3 d n' d ; pGw_litc� ! 4 w. r�©oj6 � Ty 1x7 -' 0 9TH ST Lar .= +` +�, t,r--A„ t.• o.8TH ST„, `k F.., •.3 rae r m C r. t l Rr .a a.. .: a, •f w ap:rt rrnt y ., �� _ - LJ pg ��p�.J \ - '' . _w� • r A 7TH ST ,• i i a " cp r+c �: . �I 4 .Te ca aw a _ u ~ J if+� �� i'+ "7110111119 mn 71 c ' :i itz-�. t‘'-',., ©Gy1 E1 +/ kms'; f71� •..='• 0• r9 it - T'�— ®�`TJ G.� 1 , .._0 a1. ... `�� .a _ 6TH ST "'yisi t;*. J it_ Itil r =. oo Q ,_ai z n 0 ,,,,6TH ST , H t.'c- a a r • . • . -0" ''1---4--!;.;4tit '-`1- ': ...7--r ' - a --..-,., -,.--_yet. 4 . ...; . g .; .._. , LEGEND , . .t. = r : -; 7 o n 4TH,ST c� • s ,Q - L Jr�? .a. I. t o Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) -sr _ •- t . a ` • z Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) > y9o� r - wl a�3RD,ST ~,I( , I 0 tion 6-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall '\. { •ft' f_ " ,i - fi r -,.' CITY OF MIAMI BEACH N NB Feasibility Study Option 6 (147 Ac) 1 inch=600 feet `°"sHLTAN'S P Ill T o 34l-IR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,2ooet Exhibit B APPENDIX H OPTION 7: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 133 of 370 Exhibit B 0 0 d F cn fZ0 Q? Cr LL tAv) i17 Ul U1 ~. Cf7 Vl ffyWldT' U1 CO CO---________? 2 - — ---_--r.._-- _--_— I 1 1 - 1 --4 0 _ -1 -3r— i 4 !Poor mh . ,.. _ ,:, -5I r !! tr. " ice' • �.+ ate' -1 — -1•t — — — — --- i -1, 1% 200 400 600 8001000 12001400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Station(ft) Page 134 of 370 Elevation nQ e,.._ - - - 7.,w r6 o —rowIt_TRASH_S I HUCT1 - ir lig 11 'l ST-99 g IIliii ST-49 011 co 0 CO CD Ctj ST-47 01 w ST-45 0 cn Ili ST-43 o II :11 11111 ST 35 o ST-34 o, f � 1037 MH-1030 IN-1175 ' ST-31 w; o' cn I IMP , cn ST-24 ST-22 ST-20 a o I ST 19A ST-18 ,r, 11. IN-1128 §,.,..=,, I ST-14A ®ST-1122 cn $ -T ' ST-6A 0. o lii ST-4 'i- m Pr IN-1:. 00 MH-1 I d 7 cn o ' IN-1014 IN-1 012 F o, F-1006 o r— IN-1010 MH-1003 m iii ii = x Q Qv'+ o CO CXflIDIt D ,,,I .:�. Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of gi It. k "j 'P' .1 !t i� '' 19TH ST _ , _ - t-19TH S a theoretical 10 year 24-hour storm event on the West • °j .7" .. , �- , - � .,-"" y Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area 1 l it ` . ,,.. ,_. east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these `_ m . H �QQ yyfw _= _ '3 - ! 4,•, 18TH ST `, results once drainage improvements have been completed v 5 18TH ST .., -4. i ' 1•• a • �BTH. throughout the entire area east of Alton Road a t • n ,ry 1 • �f m b - I.. t -."Mrt I 0 czga. t" _ ' �zi j.i. yy� s , i ` a Ct i omm.• 1. >, dI rs _' 17. r f$11 TH ST:, sl - j tl 1e14te z 1 .wig VENETIAN CSVIY ''' °i �= .v :"‘P9116!. --",•1 + •- 9s- NLINCOLN LN • a "ewI "°!'--1� 6. .+� f L C4.- Y t .j1 _ Inig _T o • w ,. iyq "+, is��uP$ir x LINCOLN RD �� i �.ate. • '._ ' ' • ' •' .'Q• � ii- c- LINCOLNLNra .w I f LINCOLVER in © '� "' r t-- ;.fin cjrii4 IA .,R.Ir ••, I �o a.��`R ! ;:OLS o a'v ,.>i MPG m 16TH ST w —.,E r • 16TH STIFz• lli iCL1 " 4, o .s. •-cam ham MEI I CEP- w#1 .I6�1!pt l.' .O , v 17i at� _ o es ss w -a uilir - i ' "-�IPA ii e"ia+ � _I Els m rid - •-.-9 15TH TEA x a @. l4 © _ ,� -a &+� r.>; `% I.It . lirI WINN,© =. „" ou a 1 ,--' ><.; . ;• '•'-+°t•,-+-1 - Q[J 15TH ST :ii ilia i 4. '� f� _ g :�boL'&Tl rd�i �SPANOLA WAYS P", o r ,114TH CT ■ _i' in 14TH PL, ' �' • `r!•, .. _' ►i` . • °� 14TH TE !.ds�gg - .. fr.' ,...7._J {J �{ \\• M1 'tr tPF' r L 466 i s, Uki.i��:i ,1••. cnay� p 14TH S1 } S"�N� 14TH ST.- `o too or2 m: d t.:,-,_. "iiiiif:r Z. v i MONAD TEA '''14/.1--, ii ` g, -1,- . 13TH ST PI . t. • .'14 ;-13THST ,. „ a ( am r- a !�" �g� .trs , o a.r ..r i " MSE- J . c_7 . do ©e 1 �•Yn�. 12TH ST p �o9�12TH ST �e z...:4 ,, , , mi " BISCAYNE BAY / .;411j . F4N_ 11TH ST o . -® 2 —=-,,rte a .._ 8 N . r '- t _ l� ,co _ ,.- a o-rigs r,.,1?�.. rt 2 ••.•.ir 10TH ST a� �, 1� A r` La * "'i irk„, N • gyp(( �jF ■4is CQ `^ - . '.i.� "Q.I., r'�a4...* eG o& 9TH ST r,� m r silo�Y7 .1`` ...rail-, sl`r-4-...i z-_,1:13mp -s-j:+ an`a ity -i® �Ei ) f a. •03 i . -_, ._ o � 8THST,,r-iv "' . • Ar,S sa�� . ��ZEiLi +wl^ 'lam .p '�4 1��r' .. ite- x �-' �' ° m "7TH ST qy•-•...K '�' Ails ,¢i+ p �p. . . y Q� .i a••0.; ` d`. `; t 6TH ST o a a rt'1. 1�4 T yM6TH ST ..:� . a �C .gyp •a a ® 1 t x ••t 0 'egiff7 +t, ~,=.4.11".n, 1!w`.n I -� .,..1v z. 555 ,Y5THST = ,.+. LEGEND o Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) • r- r ',ITN'S it _ i.e.;„ •'_ ....! G.. '. Z - Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) .F _ y- , - i 3R'O ST t A a Option 7-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75”Rainfall 1 - ,�.,`N # 44 14111111 N ;g CITY OF MIAMI BEACH /" ce9Feasibility Study Option 7 (147 Ac) n 1 inch=600 feet "''`'Ir'"rS Pall/TI(°24H-IR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,2o0et Exhibit B APPENDIX I OPTION 8: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 137 of 370 Exhibit B N LEGEND: PROPOSED —D•IS PUMP rrr -- BURIED ATT 1 RIP-RAP (WCA0 VENT (EYP.OF 6) ___... - ...-_.....___.___.. a-., BURIED FPL -PROPOSED PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC -r BURIED GAS SEAWALL CAP SIDEWALK "• DZET12 FIBER OPTIC TOP EL 5.20 I TRASH RACK —--— NIC i-OF-wnY I STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL in CATCH BASIN -DISSIPATgt E INV EL-11.5 DUCT BANKS(REFER� O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE 32"ID FRP 60"ID FRP R.O.W.LIMIT (s/LE FOR tl'•1T sEE'I) STRUCTURE OVERFLOW PIPE(4) PUMP STATON -WET WELL WATER 1REA1MENT BOS FL-14.0 TO ELECTRICAL DWCS.) � O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE BOS EL-3.0 INV EL E(4) OVFRROW BOS EL-21.5 UNIT(EYP.) BOS EL-21.0 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE gSCHARCE PIPE(5)—__ - --_� - —__—--—- IZ,.SUME.PI!-P� TO TELEPHONE MANHOLE r VI EL-1.33 rR _ �� - g -- 1 N •a3 BACI(FLOW PREVENTER 32'ID FRPC Q FRE HYDRANT }� ® - 1• „„-7- -- r—_' •,I ® WATER TV METER BOX tJW" F 0 WATER METER BO% n LL 111111 , I • DRNNAGE WELLS I 0 J II I� 06"0 DRAINAGE PIPE I C - ul t>! '1 ,,ZICRETE W R �I �- 1 !- , ____4 !! L 11 pi i_,,,,,,- 1 - ._„„,,,,„.,.., _...._„.........„.... - 1\ 311,00 - Illy A� ��,�"00 Lincoln Road r/ + I 11 yl �� I nrr- •• 'PROPOSED _ +It r,. -__ -- T�1n in wn[a� at I CAP AND l SANITARY SEWER IIF �— _11,0 ® RESTRAIN AND MH `! JI / ra I� 5= in / W TIE-BACK SUPPORT(TP.) BO.ID STATION OVERFLOW !// a J II --- PROPOSED 1 ELECTRICAL DUCT r - —--— BANKS(REFER TO 32'FLAP - CTRICAL DwGS.) _ .,___ _ 7/ _____ _ VALVE(EYP.) _____ _1 1 EXISTING FPL PROPOSED 12"WATER MAIN. EXISTING GAS LINE DUCTBANK TO RRE HYDRANT REFER TO WATER DRAWINGS REMAIN FOR DETAnS. LIMIT —_-- --I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH ,�aaO ' CITY M DM OF ,A ENGINEER OF RECORD EIe6. OPTIONS ER.JN.MYL.MORAIER DESIGN ENGINEER'.JT. me:OP1B_Ol.l.g STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION „ ROY COLEY,P.E. SNP.mg... PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT nnE: p IL ...,. ,,11 CNEcxER T A W WWI. SAMIT F.Bock P.P.:_-- 6NMKOm.1:W1F®1.M 11mmNENNGNCENTER(NNE,MINN BFAON,FL PROPO�TEd SITEPLAN-PUMP STATION car ENGINEER rETsoN PEIFz.I•.wF,PE. ,F AS NOTED W. No M. NO 961E REVISION TwPDBR D.I,:lA/BR/ls &,.N D,.en,O ovn 01 Exhibit B wl �. N I I LEGEND: I BURIED ATT '•'� BURIED FPL I FPL DUCTBNA III e —-— BURIED GAS TO BE RELOCATED • a� 1r I RURIED FIBER[PDC ` PROPOSED DRAINAGE Y _ RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED DRAINAGE f M 11'•Y W nm I O ,CONFLICT STRUCTURE PROPOSED CONRICT STRUCTURE / ' ( (S CATCH BASIN V \ DRAINAGE INLET R.O.W.LIMITANAGE MANHOLE ® STORM p RANISEWER MANHOLE OO ELECTRICAL MANHOLE .03 PROPOSED O' TELEPHONE MANHOLE Q U SAGUARO BEWER CONTROL PANEL COMMUNICATIONS ® CABLE N COMMUNICATION BOX ELECTRICAL PUTGORM LINE TO BE 03 J EL 8.44' RELOCATED i�M ® WATER METER BOX aI O PROPOSED ELECTRICAL "' ' I DUCT CORRIDOR W ._ r z UJ _ ,- . 1 -- 3050' I 1 l 1I'3 11 W w�i. n.E1.I.i allI z1' S.OA' \ I I a— W E ENCASED 15-0 I/f_ ' r SANITARY SEWER 1 In illi--1 n I FPL VAULT o + _. F.F.EL 4.20'3 r O 31Bi 00 I o - I }4.00' JBI 1 M 84 Llneolnl Road £1 I.. .L -&J II al — g1 5'GATE I 10)W I \.. ..-. - . .. .. 1 ARCHMEDIAUNRBARS E&82 80' J 10'CATS F IIS I. X FPI.WOIBANK Emma ire J I TO BE RELOCATED WATER MAIN TO I I. J BE RELOCATED =U I FPL DUC BANTU D REMAIN rC PROPOSED G ELECTRICAL DUCT I BANK(REFER TO ELECTRICAL I DADS.) R.O W.LIMIT _\ 1 A. 1 I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS ENG oF RECORD: lAf ENGINEER OF RECORD File Name:OPT A2 G.g /VII!-.\ STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C-0S CITY MANAGER JIMMY ORCLMORALES DIRECTOR DEB ENGINEER, C-09 REC OR ROY COLEY PE DM BT 1T ANSurvey ROMAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TL' XR FW Bo. Pave— Work ONer:GE..m pP 1�I3gq ofR:xELBW PgEZ.lAC011E,PE. CH„„,,. ' AS NOTED cwA9 .c I T/vM 100OJMYNf101 C!"F"ONn"'"""N"'�'.F11p PROP�EO SITE LAN-PUMP STATION �•••��•�� CAR ExcINEE F. Rkcx. NO DATE w.1rN REVISION APP!.BY R. 1e/23/I11 SA..., Or.,,morin 02 Exhibit B cos D IN O 1�al 4\ LLa'1 N4al CI mR w . fel ,.L®...cuPP,f, I[1 FT- --c,' f' 1I Ii1 1 -2li.I I 1416.I I I r -3 Iimollowoo",""—- -4 5 c 0 2 LT, _ t. 12 — — -1 , 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 Station(ft) Page 140 of 370 Elevation(fl) . ' 4'Mil�L N LL o r' w : i_S .• ITRU CT1 ST-99 . I— sfn I -UI .t N I ST-49 A I - O_ . W o Y ST-47 ,- ST-45 ST-43 s` .T-41 .T-39 ry S-37 t' Il ST-35 E il kN-1037 — .. MH-1038 co . 114-1175 ST-31 o 0 iT in I / 1 - ___ " 1 ST-24 ST-22 ST-20 o - ST-19A ST-18 MP 011+1128 a i 3 ST-HA ST-12 ST 6A 0 = i ST-4 ST-1 1 m x o I I I I W 0 CxrnOIT Ls IMPIr- R , „., • Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of • alj . 19TH ST +t—19TH S a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West 1 -r :, Veil' .',,,, Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area W i r-,� E H O,acc. tript, '` 1; ,i • east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these -.•--1 ' ,"' - , results once drainage improvements have been completed 3 o i 18TH ST a• a�' `-- 16TH SST throughout the Alton Rod, a a .s i` 18TH t ' h entire area east of S a ul•" .- •s: 7.14,...",t41 esa ''� _,.*tt1TH:ST- .- VENETIAN CSWY .., i ar�j - PI i. �n. r 1 El v'Tqa6t r; w TiG ! i v. p i L _a..... =Ne. !! " lm i f ,'m --- _— YrN LINCOLN LN � " j' _ P■+IP';""', � �X LINCOLN RD �� •111.?4}j ` r.. N 10 11101 ' • LINCOLN LN 'P LINCOLNdER�.� 111 r!t o afi,Errak �� 5,(1- i1� hi ,,+.� may] I. ;+ at9 ''�-77 , :ate ®!" '1: ,c, : , �� m 16TH • � 16TH STS �� ® ®° "'�1 :>��!. �• 1 1 15TH•TER 015;01 IN IN g m' �t 7,..„,,,.,„ :�. 104 , OW ,a 71b.• ,a.w s •'CiY w11_ww w prt �uya� - ',� �`* ,� •� o 15TH ST 9o°tv inset. m14 =1 �! l fit, ]� 7 rim tix4 . V �k! x.. wit 0 llW l SPANOLA WADY- A... '' 'l am 14TH CT : =i' 1�C 14THPL •,�' " fe.�, 141HTPR rp�'�, '� -i 'a �� © iiii rRANI ""ABS. r, '11i.11117.1.:4,1-111c ,,, j m 14TH ST ffa t t . -- 14TH #1 Qti : acs lin' ail �' ■aI, iia C■ z MONAD TER �. -L+,. �, _�. 13TH S � rt � .• +,�Z ...:" 13THST ,,,, ®I ■, %: 'z ' .. !rf ! ^4 .t-F, �4 `�,,'��y , o....12TH ST j ;.14--Ail tp� s PPPlIr al' 12TH ST 0 ©.� / • l�,l r'1.)..; �7;,_ • 1 C� ,Z{�^•1 _ . /w~'� a`^,• f BISCAYNE BAY 1 11TH ST* �411oz- � "'' 4 tut : .. Y• t'. INNI'#%.'s :11.. 'w z .i■ a ■�fii'-4. �. T ^�,-,l '�M �1�r. :IL't 11 ~'� ■ ■ • ny.i nw■EE+air• ' �•.. - 1'a. 4 ilk iv a-ii` r"4t , i �.i " 10TH S , L. aa 1- ;\,, n,.w st1Na oo�,� W N' " a i `-- z , -1 9TH ST �.. .,■�. .s�� i'r' e 4 `�4r i LC, lir YP.a �. ] �!.. 0 8THST,�, .' �`' y✓ �t R1L r-• INIF 1-„eso, ,, traF Al '_ _,a a-— _ '-' -. • s,grit.", *mil tti, , y m t x m iie ST t° �4 4 r a� c 1 i_ =i , Mk -.1,: QS 6TH SooeTlz .. F r :z .�"'^.,,,,,,6THST .1., , e. V m .:.!--i--, C s, 1 JaI .it. ("ti •Ry. ! '�• 47'�`I -� ...r .� P . e STH ST 5.s •.� _._ Z{ •,Y , LEGEND '4 - #`oho 0 4 ,. 4TH:ST W o Offsite Eastern Area Sub-Basins(453 Acres) . / y� r" ` iq a • o '' - Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) --y9 c; "14:41.---z.-::" ' E 4 Option 8-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rainfall t F £ • €;► O CITY OF MIAMI BEACH " C Feasibility Study Option 8 (147 Ac) n 1 inch=600 feet n CONSULTANTS P1 ' ° 3d7-1R Design Storm Event 0 600 1,20Feet Exhibit B APPENDIX J OPTION 9: Plans, ICPR 4 Flood Maps, and Hydraulic Grade Lines Page 143 of 370 Exhibit B -- -- I N LEGEND: jj PROPOSED -6Y PUMP RIP-RAP DISCHARGE VENT 1.11 -- BURIED Ali _. _.. ,i-_.-.-. :171./:12:$ FPL —PROPOSED PROPOSED CUL-OE-SAC .r RIED GAS SEAWALL CAP SIDEWALK II we- --- RIED FIBER OPTIC TOP EL 570 —- � HT-OF-WAY I TRASH RACK o ; M CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL- I-DISSIPATOR E INV EL-11.5 DUCT BANKS / O STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE 32-ID FRP 60-ID FRP R.O.W.LIMIT (saeA Fal H..IT.REAO SOS EL RE PUMP STATION -MEI WELL WATER TREATMENT BOS EL-14.0 O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE BOS LL-3.0 ovE,F W PPE(4) SOS EL-21.5 UNIT(TIP.) NV El-1.33 OVERfT.OW BOS EL-26.0 © ELECTRICAL MANHOLE wP�- 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE _--__ __- �� or W ERP +� '�- - - - - A N •^-"3• BACN ROW PHEVENIER DISCHARGE PIPE(6) -'1 O O FIRE HYDRANT + , NV EL-1.33 r.1 I`,s I L —1111",;1 1LJ CD hi CABLE TV COMMUNICATION BOX — L.11 IL——_1 L——_11 1L_I F WATER NEER BOX iii ,�. :. -----7-- _t, DRAINAGE WELLS I %•w DRAINAGE PIPE F � _ .. r o 1j :'R CMCRE TE -' W It 1t 1 'I� :wNN .. ...rte w r , L. Ca E 11 %I° _......-- •--- I�,oD 1,4 Iii " � 7( rrW. r ._ 1 1 Lincoln RoadP. I + l _Mp _ CAR AN•D a F-" G ESmAN M H/ W , _} _ I.IT \ V 60-ID PUMP STATION / OVERFLOW ( - ,/ -PROPOSED I IL H ELEBANCTRICAL DUCT l ,� ... 11Tj1 i Mb <]/- / EXISTING SANITARY VALVE( ) SEWER MH TO REMAIN EXISDNG FPL PROPOSED t2•WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS LINE DUCIDANK TO REMAIN FIRE HYatANT M w.. -ROW SEWER G SANITARY _ I MI NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMIBEACH CDB OPTION 9 Ems:RECORD . ENGMEER OF RECORD F4 Name OPT90I Ewq STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION C-B9 CITYMANAGERROYYLEY..EMORALES NGINEER JT. u ppECEOR ROr COLEY.PE CRAM BY lj.ljj. Surn, anar FraBs._ PSC— PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT "'D- .[pp e 44},��(.V IIA 'R INoaxAwrXMaINawwrvA.MN.wMal.a ala PROP( D SI IE r IL -I•,•..", CITY ENGINEER NB811N YFIFZJNX.E.Pa E A460051 DMI[ t uDATE w9�T1rA LAN-PUMP STATION A5NO1® R lu"°''"°' NO DATE REVISION APPO BR o.e. to/zs/,s Sleet_- u, a ovve 01 Exhibit B 1I f N LEGEND: BURIED ATT -.__. I I ll r. BURIED FPL --� BURIED CAS __ --- _ - BURIED FIBER OPTIC RIGHT-OF-WAY • CATCH BASIN r ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE I ) 3 �----- BOK>+E® ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE V \ DRAINAGE ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE \ INLET ---R.QW.LIMIT ////// C ——_ a F.. B TELEPHONE MANHOLE -r O --- CI U151 CABLE Tv R BO%ICADON BOX "� C OWATER METE I C J UGHRNG CONDUIT TO BE REuONED ah IL 1 ON 0 MHOPOSED ELECTRICAL \ °p.. WW k DUCT BANNS �� COMMUNICATIONS W I Nf TO REMAM I COI W WNUJ I J 11t°17. SANITARY SEWER co 1 N.I EXISTING WATER MAIN !in + I 318+00 319000 n - bq 1 ---- I 1 I r Lincoln Road 4 4 MI 41) WI �W Z I FPL DUCTMARK - - ��, kIi touoKw � _ C,/ V i. F Q 1--t \''.1 g 1 f,i1I I.f. 11 P.O.W.OMIT ` illi-,,i \ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION M'DC9DB.00 OPTION 9 ENG.OF REOORO JLC. ENOREEROFRTCO _ e 0,9_02 0, Jul�i AlYI 11/4-1-1 STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION EH"sly MOPAEEs OcsIGN ENGINEER..111.- HECTOR ROY COLEY p DRAVA sr.._,_j. , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT lull IL CSS co MANAG cHEc1En JN 0,/.JXO wW.11I P.E. INON00 W ....I.MOCOMMnMIO311E.nIN . E.M.BEACH EI 33 PROPP��D SITEPL"AN-PUMP STATION .. aTr EPDNEER reaDN FaEavtaE,va SCALE AS NOTED MREG...Tm. DATE REvsaN _ s..� ---- OPT9 02 Exhibit B , N I I PROPOSED 16-FT PROPOSED IB-�DIP INTERNAL DIAMETER FDR DRAINAGE WELLS SEDIMENTARCN TANK 9 PROPOSED 16-FT ' 03INTERNAL DIAMETER PROPOSED CONCRETE -J Q • WET WELL STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE WELL M \ R.O.W.UNIT . _.——... (scu[.FL¢..1,•.a-fi'SNf[n 13 I --- ---�- CONCRETE�--� -. -- -_i -- ------ -- -- PROPOSED Q STRUCTURE FptDRAINA4 WELL ' ;. - : ' .. g CII 1 {.. O WI IW ' W W M WAZ MI I STORDRAINAGETER IrW ELECTRICAL D CT BANK y IMA _ r-CORRIDO R, wA�l N�:ti W BURIED I� in I + IN 32O+G0 611+W ',NMI.,"..wll< 524 7 I:a r Lincoln Road N M M Q • s1 Q H / H MI _ _ WATER MMM P DUCT BANK l GAS NE 'NJ yi W Z' 11DI11NC CONDUIT I= TO BE REMOKD J (a)I Q f rL Q I� I I I _ I __ __i ( R,O,W,UNIT—"."""-----.."—"'"...."...."......"- —— LEGENDS BURIED ATT BURIED FPL BURIED GAS BURIED FIBER OPTIC RIGHT-OF-WAY B CATCH BASIN O° STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE o SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O ELECTRICAL MANHOLE O' TELEPHONE MANHOLE ..%+µ BACK FLOW PRE SEN TER O FIRE HYDRANT ® �°:.l°N LI NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION {. -,..fD ENG OF RECORD JAL ROOMER OF RECORD- NtIF OPTIOL9 CIS OTT ER JWYLMDMMEB DSS ENGINEER_F..- k»Am.aPs_aBtl.y STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION ,T enat- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ,LP['7�(] -�yl��y,.µl.}JOU/ DIRECTOR BOY CDEY.P.E. DRAWw BY JR A ..,M ,NomAaTrloxuxl,vwM u,M MAO,Ft v1u PROYOxJE�JI I C r CRY ENGNEER NELSONPEIR2. 'DE.PE, AMA. MNUArt NNE — FiMO Book T.M.. NNE Qtly:v LAN-PUMP STATION SGALE_ �NO�D NO DATE k FEVINION APP..01 Cow 10/25/16 CNK QOM On7 O) Exhibit B N 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE 1 I STRUCTURE FOR DRAINAGE WELL m _ RO W. m ______('SCALE:II.. OMIT � ' � VI 3 I 8 O I- RA IliZ CO >rr 111 , . M 0 -... <WvarrMssn�AImaFs�axlAnr.> .Y N323+00 324+03 __ _ _ _ 325+00 N NI I W IV a [ _ R.O.w.IIMIT - , _ LEGEND: MATCH LINE STA. 144+00 (SEE SHEET OPT9 05) BURIED A II •.. BURIED FP BURIED GAS BURIED FIBER OPTIC --—— HIGHT-OF-WAY • CATCH BASIN O STURN DRAINAGE MANHOLE O SANITARY':EWE.MANHOLE 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE o TELEPHONE MANHOLE .aa. BACK FLOW PRE VENTER O EIRE HYDRANT ® CABLE:TV COMMUNICATION BOA la WATER MT 110 ROE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION M I AM I BEACH �� OPTION 9 ENG OR tcc D�� ENGNEEHOFRECMp File Name OPTS W Ery COCTORGER.ROY EVP E DESIGN ENGINEER J , STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CSS DRQ .r „ Suva/Mamma V COV 14VR. ROra]L MORK. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT °lia.. 11 q 7(T'(E' IiV I L aEarEn'. 1 R WM/TM U TOo FNM_ A _ P4: IN OmoT. u . Imo mmAgTOI0200 .WMMo0..L Jim PROPPpdgE0 SIPLAN-PUMP STATION an ENONEER RB.sON FF�z.MmFE,Rt. 020E 40.D,ED R. „o NO ).. ., DA FEV0I011 wooer ar: Io/sin NI.a omac O►H 0M Exhibit B I .•—+_...--z i (SCNE.„'.IY MEM Si LEGEND: 1 I -;..i. BURIED ATT BURIED FPL I I 0 BURIED GAS I I I I1 . ` BURIED FIBER OPTIC I I __ W — — RIGHT-OF-WAY CATCH BA9N -- I x •OP STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE 0 SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE IN — 0 ELECTRICAL MANHOLE I W 0 TELEPHONE MANHOLE FLOW REVENTER — y D BRENHYDRANT +4®�RwNv ®rAirial 110 CABLE TY COMMUNICATION ..-�— WATER METER BOX I Tr T. PROPOSED STORM Q WATER DRAINAGE F Cl) West A W 143+00 143+00 I I 1 I I // I I f I PROPOSED l " -PROPOSED '. •. • ..-T SAN I TART ELECTRICAL M SEAER r-, M OUST BARK41, `PROPOSED WATER MAIN MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET OPT9 06) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH MCNBCOHOOD OPTION 9 ER. ENGINEER OF RECORD HMXx a OP 9 OSEwy STORM DRAINAGE PUMP STATION CIS MA EH 4IMMTL MORALES M DESIGN ENGEERJj� Syne BebmiTS pp 1��qq��{ ��}} ce DIRECTOR ROY COLEY PE MAYA BYPayer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ma PROPOS SITEY� N- ", CRYEROWER NELSON REIQ.WAIPE.PE AS NOTED X. RBBB.PE T TM/W ...... Field Bed P AN«OroW.N,.a... B.COMET,IONCNTER P.E.WY wLF.a,s PUMP STATION No DUE REOSON ADM BY AU 10/zs/Is D.,,I„G Om OW Exhibit B • MATCH LINE-WEST AVENUE (SEE SHEET OPT9 05) — — — — — ______IR.D.W.LIMIT— II I II -' r II / -- - QIW 'EM 11 r RIEED� II a LEGEND:Na cri •_1 c r� WEST AVE. _ _ � ii - — -- BURIED ATT /I 1625 WEST l , Ti r __... BURIED FPL IZ BURIED CAS It n BURIED FIBER OPTIC \\� rIL11 J` "TITT�� - _— RIGHT-OF-WAY �-�\ DI • CATCH BASIN t•, Z ® STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE C I\ L ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1111 ISI"� 0 ® ELECTRICAL MANHOLE CO�TRO PANFL — ELECTRICAL PLATFORM .® TELEPHONE MONOCLE \ // � ��\ %� EL BAC - BAC"ROW PREVENTER ��,:•. .,' % �;_ O FIRE HRDRANT ® CABLE 1v cwMUNlc•noN BOX 0 WATER METER BOX • • - roll , / le .■E�■iil II EMERGENCE GENERATOR y SLAB ELS 5.6I FPL VAULT / \\ —/// 1I \ ,I� .•\____„--,---::::l•�QN W MAYI BEACH _ FOLIO.02-3233-017-0120 .„-----on NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MI AM I BEACH OPTIONG9 CITY GB NO OFREOpb L ENGINEER OF RECORD Name OP 9-oEE•Ve a OfOe A T L MORALES DESIGN ENOIMEER,U... STORM DRAINAGE`UMP STATION ��` DIRECTOR CO.`,Y,ve R �..,R.N.."a PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Hpp q4qq��ff-� ..� an '" , Ic 'o,n.no 'w..��.. F.BROL ° -- 100m"'�"10M�1ER01"'EM.M.EAaRa'' PROP�EI�SITE'PL"AN-PUMP STATION ENGINEER NELSON PERU�•�NW,ve o.M- / „ sN.l �Mp_ IS NOTED ND lM1E REVISIDN APPD.BY 025 9 OPT9 00 Elevation(IQ d-^ s--c• -- - `' —" = o -J LR_TRASH_STRUCT1 _ - 1 ______-.-.-:'■ ST-104 0 0 i cyl o -95A w o o o — __ Elevation(1q -- -. - ; . _.. a w ry L' = - rv-`''L.'_ '• H_STRU(_T1 I' '' ST-99 I m _ ST-49 W J D ST-47 1 ST-45 oST-43 cl • .T-41 • i T-39 iv y-37 ST-35 I ST-34 43 w ST 32 Ln IN-1037 MH-1038 IN-1175 5 ST-31 Elr II- LJ 1 ST-24 i. ST-22 - ST-20 o ST-19A --__— - ST-18 IN-1128 .. ,n !M3 j _- r ST14A Mr ST-12 .- .. ST-6A �ST-4 r ST-1 • m x W CAIIIUIL D .. - . 44 Disclaimer:This map displays the modeling results of Lei�W ,' - 1 , lir lg� THH SST r 19TH .. a theoretical 10-year 24-hour storm event on the West N 1 4 ". �. , y,,., Avenue drainage area considering no impact from the area A. ic lei XM • .� pOH';? : .iP a: t east of Alton Road.West Avenue will only achieve these u oo 3 .18TH ST'. OTH.ST r results once drainage improvements have been completed j ,;e f r a, i�f� ; throughout the entire area east of Alton Road. c - •••• �,. 4. 18TH.-�a y' fir_ ` • 41 ! lr f-- j 1 >C }f� ' 41b �•. . . � � ',� +�• ,olYtl Lsa -- .r •reT°11TH;ST•. VENETIAN CSWY- ,..•- r "41141410" z.,7,,,,_ i P � �. rR N LINCOLN LNC a .+.a , Q. L.�. °irr�iF o LINCOLN RD " ' . �' �� , ."7 Z LI9COLNLN� `11e . . R r r ' > LINCOLN, is rpt ea :_ ♦ --.. t...i L. t Sr` :ClipIs3 i� eke a' •� �, o '' ^ �°° �6'" '� °E' 16TH ST © tom_ oom. w�16THSTk �1 � n�� • • j =3.Z 7�..,, +� '�' i ~' j° ♦ 15TH•TEfl t lip -, `� "*' wiz g �_ a.,rs 1 i;,- �° sa © ter, O.'_'1 . r,6, ! •t-, �7 k`1 lig.T.-• --„. • �ti.� li '” � . Q l]t® �a 15TH ST ®n 11 ! tor a1� tAir +i ,A � � r♦ r d .- oo ¢,e,s, ESPANOLA WAY f �rLar 14TH C�� . �;o el • 15 �•'. 4. ; r; .. °u��_ 14TH PL �i3,'s as ' ))- 114TH.TEfl �'rip�'� L °,, a o ❑ 3 �+ ,1, 2c, 14TH ST, Q, , 14TH ST ,. . . a oma ; -. s `�, ',� 1/ � aa. �E• cam° c a1'• i MONAII TER 5 c' is U 13TH.. r• . .^"' ■ 13TH ST _o d '• . � r : �c ill jh+ A«�onr'� 12TH ST 0 •" a� 12TH ST r . iY;.y Y'rqq[[ • z a y..,, �• r-1.1-'- far1 Le ,-. m ©�y ? -'^ , „i' 1"` BISCAYNE BAY ` X11 r^ 9 �� ir e .. .. fp: Pj) '1._ F. � -- r"�y��►' � `N � [�1+�ST� l� ��3 -'�0 ar Z "f� f ,r �f`�' rr, 1 lir ��8 ®s L O f� - PY 1 fig el la �.. • Ybg,,, +;,- ( •"}rj.� �-- ��#! >t -''TECH 1 � I� - f gets CL E.. .' �J 10TH ST cry i N ....4 r,6 td �l C G..!GGF - L� t".., coo•,r � -3' Ili ii--, ; a � � i ~ ,vert. H �► t o r1�ANi1 iIT � �a L� •Ri�Nr 3>� ,4, 6. G "'tiliti.: -nil G;J ] ®. 0 8TH ST„,,l-,- F :�r'r,4. .iT'h � i r .,.. r; 1 - "rt ,. t_ o m r 1 'i! :,�. :tea . .. '°' t `21 •, a X -,= r,a a4 4m �,!� / . °` 6TH ST c • , '1* 'a 1 °ov%al. r1z IMP ?. z16THST • k.i.,... c W LEGEND 7 Aft.47 1___4 J ti • 4TH:ST S , Offsite Eastern Area Sub Basins(453 Acres) " _ L•t - a . Proposed Project Area Sub-Basins(147 Acres) y$ '. -+�'• "' z ., �- =3RD ST r - Option 9-10Y24H Max Flooding-8.75"Rain fall ' .- t j . ?i^I:•& ilt > CITY OF MIAMI BEACH n" Ci 9 Feasibility Study Option 9 (147 Ac) A 1 inch=600 feet /,\ CONSULTANTS Pit A° 34(-IR Design Storm Event 0 600 1,20eet Exhibit C MIAMI BEACH Lincoln Road Storm Water Treatment System Location Concepts West Avenue Phase II Improvements City of Miami Beach, Florida 0C-1114 COTINC. CIO �ERRELD C 0 N $ U L i A N T $Page 153 of 37 .. .. Agenda ..tr...... iwir.: 1 m.........1 ................... .. ..L. .,...„,.......„..., ..„,..._„.. 1 Storm Water Drainage Project Background & History 3 = 2 Components of a Storm Water Treatment System stem 6 p Y .. ,. '' 3 Summary of Options 19 :". - - = 4 Storm Water Treatment System Options 21 mss.... `.. •�. 4a: Base / DB Team Recommended 21 . ,,, .' 4b: Highly Preferred Recommendations 27 `" "= `' 4c: Preferred Recommendations 0 :411t 'Oil' -r* - ..,sr--440 4d: Not Recommended ` .. 5 Neighborhood Benefits 4 "7"� : 5a: Project Benefits for Neighborhood 62 5b: Water Quality Improvements 63 -14.. 6 Questions • ON' ., T. . "'74'• __,,...4...„, . " .„ N. •jt ,2.4r. • rib 4461111111 r..,,, =at.1.1 ir ,ir" gra*,4-.4•41,' ' '.N....4c . ._ 4.4... -....... li ..-- "...... i -.7..'--- 'bite.iir..... '••••40.,:b .,,,,ter . . 444arcr,";air II....0 Y.,.1,...an. -. • . •'::„. ,..a .. .. .....1 .1'.'.1g..t....".* 40•441W,:: '' ‘.. ...,. . SI "111,'4. •.• , ...•t....,•,,.„,.... ••••••.„..., it . ,...-------"-- , -,,,',.,„,tzlit...4}1.;:-irr,r,....r.••••••.. -- r •_ .. .. - .. .4....•....„.. .. . • .— ....._ --- .......... Jailliallb .. , 4 ..,...A0 .. **'411111160.111111111111. , ..4 '' :: r',4,,,, - . t ',. I I - -. . Storm Water ' rainage Project Background & , , --.. .1.------ .. -.....,, •...... , `..... . -... •-.1., History ., , . -- r \ 11111 - - ...- i a I at . 110.0-t- ._ ' • , N.• re. at ''' .... ..- 40. so 9 , . IIIStorm Water Drainage Project Background & History March 2017 9 City Commission approves Design Build contract with RMCF/CES based on a 5-year Storm event. Existing Flooding Issues Dec. 2017 • City "Pauses" project at 60% design. April 2018 • City partners with the Urban Land Institute (ULI). - • n• bpi i if 1 May 2018 • West Ave selected to participate in the Resiliency f . , y Accelerator. i i -�. i' RMCF/CES focusing on feedback from the community ‘,e ., June-Sept. 2018 • working with ULI. LIII,Iiik _ 4 x r Recommendations presented to City Commission Oct. 2018 • including. Rain Flooding 10-year storm event 2. Provide Auxiliary Generators Dec. 2018 • Commission approves recommended enhancements. Page 156 of 370 Negative feedback received from Lincoln Road residents. r ; :; May 2019 City requests to examine alternate locations for the above ^?n ground Storm Water Treatment System equipment. sT„ z . -• :. June 2019 RMCF/CES proposed Option 1 (Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd) - - Aug.-Oct. 2019 Median design of Option 1 reached 90% completion. I" RMCF/CES provides formal presentation of ten (10) November 2019 alternate locations, recommending Option 1 (Lincoln Ct - and Bay Rd) as the favored site. , _ `- RMCF/CES provide a complete history of the King Tide Flooding development of alternate sites. The concept of weekly meetings with residents ensued to answer questions on , - - , 4 February 2020 Screening Design and Park-End development for the recommended location - Alternate 1 (Lincoln Ct and Bay II ;. ' Rd). . 3 1 ._ c r June 2020 City requests a Limited Feasibility Study. ---i4- JUS 2020 RMCF/CES complete the Limited Feasibility Study with 11 Y Options. Rising Sea Levels Today Page 157 of 370 '', ,",,, „. ,,••,4."4„;.',,,,,,,N.,...",'..,,,,,-,.-,,.,„,,,-,•,,,,,-„,,z,-pa, ,„,,.• , '''' ..- ,..,"1.'-'-,,,":„,..,..,...."-„,-..".,:'• ' •,i.-..,„. •• , - .. , .. ... , „ . • ... .;,- _ ' ' aldlIMEMMilitifiiiS411_ 1 M- „,A „. -4............ . "11116111 •••.. ' '''..."'" . 4 -‘""&*-1-z- .:- , vx' -. - -- -,-we--.-,,--,---••- 'IP'.• t . , „.„ --''''••="4=.''. --12"... ..' O. ' '2 • .'' r'-i---- -ilia;ira°lin , 40*F. •, •.. , .41C,^ -17Att Nr : -..-:1;-•••"1 •1, •1.,, 1,, V." ' _ ..'" ,1.........s. 1:tE . ' ,:.„... !.....3 ... , .. ........... .,„'................ .....-- .......,-... ........... IP 1 , " I 1 --- -.--. . ' • . d". . ... i .t. • ' .• .... ' • ' ' .' . " ' .. . ... . . 1. • 444. •vt, . OF , • ... ,.1,1 }i. .W•Ifty . . ... Components of a Storm Water Treatment System , . _ .,. . -Apt , _ I ;, ,. . • rillirms. i .21111" ... sit a ' .., ...2.41, -- —- , t- \ . ,e,,, f 4 • 7 0 qp. 404116 . -!.. - , . o '1P, ft _, ..-- • . --f . t ' IP. it. f , .. .• .., - I, I.* • _. .. • gr. r If— C-- t 4 ' . , -0.4/111illik. \ ..• - ... ' li.. ilt k IN . . , , •C 4.... -all•••- ' Ak.dell,. it . . Below Ground Components :... ,t,, L %, ...4., , , __ , . t 4 , , . _-ftli ti_ le- . 1 - +�� t • at: .. ii $ '• 'I, • ' O'''' ® �: 71 k 1 A. P ate- i ` " V rJ r 1. It �'� -7116,; .. , i'�' a', l 4 `i ,-- Iz r I: .a , t` ` Gid, t r, � arc T \ _ . , ), ti. / (if) :, ' i t ' I ! 1 y; 1 , L o , D . / .,. , N 0 R," N) g ,. 1 � . ,�Ey mak, YL. W .-z;:. , ','-A-,„' ' '' . "x 0 . cp ,, �' i Q . o T V ;C'/ Y , • • II Inflow Drainage Piping II 1IIIIiiouiii I . ► 'fir! N N The inflow — ' ,. � - � „ ii1111 �.. ., - . ,� , .�. ;, - - drainage piping Iy � " 11a � ,,or- II11 conveys the 1 ash amount of — 'a 11I ' - i � nh a ,, Storm Water ,� .■ , ry ,t � U U I generated in a - theoretical o� 10-year storm �t- P event. 'age .1 o II i „ , • , Below Ground : Trash Rack II , , __. Ir-a_ VIIIIIIIIIMMINIMMILEMP ,q siBBThe trash rack is used . BOX CUL�ftT i / /� �� _ - /RAcX ''''.1FLOW to help maintain a .:- SOX CURRY .1 COs R1/T :)° ) clean discharge into Biscayne y Page 161 of 370 II , , _...,„ , . Below Ground : Filtration System ! ! ,..„:„......„ I The filtration 4.., _._ ._ system helps .0%CULVERT II.'i ..1%., , CCNIEC71 CDS 1 TREATMENT UMT EL-TO - cos I...". 1 . BO%CULVERT FIBERGLASS CDS INLET BOX CULVERT maintain a 1...1.! FLUME EL-115 _ clean ,_.... , = ,..., 11. . ,, , - . , discharge into...„,1 • ri f:..., ...„ , Biscayne Bay. .._/: SCUDS STORAGE SUMP Page 162 of 370 1 ' II t '-,.... .... . ... ll Below Ground : Wet Well/ Pumps ■I ',. CONCF I IL CLOSURE AROUND PIPE– G "Or a IMO WORM 11A The wet well houses MN1FOL0IPthe submersible pumps. SUBMERSIBLEIF , - u IIIMIEN • Ii ` ' ' d. J Y.r - ANCHORS _ r AS PER PLYGT 15•_O• . •—_—�.. f REQUIREMENTS -_ - - y' TYPE 316 SS �-✓ '� �• - Page 163 of 370 • • • --l'• ' .. •- • =- 1 II Below Ground : Dissipator II The dissipator PROPOSED SEAWALL CAP rio‘i , .. , (RFFFP iC�STRU�TURAt. SPAWNOS) reduces the vDT. • ,��nil 2, - velocity of the EL 125 ftill r '` 1 _ ,- -- I1i,...1 .. p r,A r p ., I I I 0 i.g la pumped Storm 4i` Water into Biscayne Bay, a • li necessary environmental riNv f / .. assurance. Page 164 of 370 1 II Below Ground : EmergencyBypass II 60-ID FRP The emergency BY-PASS MANIFOLD 0,FI5� - bypass system V Dm 2.7� 1-- - - allows the a 1 station to 59 LF O 1.15$ - WET WELL . _ discharge { Storm Water PUMP STATION BY-PASS PROFILE - without the 1 7 need for pumps. Page 165 of 370 1 ' I Below Ground : Water Quality Wells II ii:, - , , , , ) ) ,„ .__; ____ _ ---- Water quality wells help � � maintain a /- clean " N - - -- - - - - discharge into F- 7: -1 Biscayne Bay. Page 166 of 370 ' :.... .,',4•er,,Ai 41`,. ' ,,'.'''..4e,„ , . 'II — AVVIIP. 13 „. C •4I , DC ... ' , ', ...... , • 0 CD . ,,, . . , • ....... _. ,.. .. . .. .... . A- 4. L.. C • ... II 0 \s fr.., , a) a ..,..,. _ , H le ... f. ink : ... ...._, ill > E . .• .., . . „,, , _ • _ .. __... it, . •A O. IN,MP 4 ...........11411111 MD •111 " 0 0 r! . _ 1 — : 0 1 l' -,-... 11.124 0 .....il• 1 . . , • • " —aa.,-.. __ U ,frournoisok al k ' 1 - 4' , * 4 , ,,t., , .• a ', e ' - .' . „.. - .. , • ' ,0 . . Page 167 of 370 .. , - .. . . , .. . II II Above Ground : Control Panel Platform • „ �- The control panel '4 'li\VV*_r;. r latform is keyto --�-- proper operation ,.��.. „��. � __ ope 4 VIA' • i, of the Storm Water -I leo� '' '''°"f w � - r . treatment system. 1 4040. m 4 ' - viii -• alit .tet7,11-t, -.hat-. -r,•''''...1.-4 �r"� to M .■ : 'j w ” I`i . • - 4 - ( ' , ip.....Mii-li •tpd.9 4 i -age .: o I 6 II Above Ground : EmergencyGenerator II .. ,,. , . , . . _ „... . , . ,. • • ._ . , ty: _._,. , , , , . . ,,,„ , ., ,. , , .R .:.„)., ..„-_ , _ , ~..„� . . The emergency illik , � generator will power the entire Storm Water . IIIA IIIIII�IIIIiII!!Ill�tlI IIIIlI!I1IIIIIIIII ".4,;:'�'-� � treatment system if IIj1I1I ! t!!! I�IIIi� I11 ".0!1�i there is a loss of o -.� : i power. -age •• o ll Above Ground : FPL Electrical Vault II 1 1 _ �� 1,250KW GENERATOR OR SET N. R II Z I 1 1 I _ — VFD VFD — VFD MCC MCC I I I y .--- - � r g ,R '� r 0 1 I i i FPL I 1I o II __ . �_ I I 1 FPL VAULT — .,✓- -� FF EL. 4.20 — j TOS EL. 8.44' __L- - - _ -_l_ i The FPL electrical vaultimili . 1 R provides reliable power to 4 41....--_,,,..."!,,_ .y. an important City asset. �\ Page 170 of 370 1 • • : ---..---0,-- . 's' - IIF .,-if . rpopgrirsp. ,,,i- t , , . I . ... 'to.. w # , ' , V * .4"' 1 C'";"4‘1.- - •\ \.,,s< \. • r • ... r , ' 101 % 41 it i - . . .. - ., . Ati.:44,,,-- • ,.... . . 4111,°' A4, 4.44 ,.1.4';% 4 r- -- N. . - . . ...• isi‘ 1 .11 ': 111111/4, si, I 4, . '';''' Ilk \ 1,. • . .k 1_ 2"tf: .•::' liket '4.. -1.. ' . qtailile ,, ... .. . . .., . suoildo jo Ailowwns • .. , . , ........., .• _. . . . . ,.............. ... .._:: • . , .-r--„, ... :,. . s.... -.., ' • ilk , -'-"'s•1114%,' '• . ,,i i..'., .,."*! i , 41111111' 1 - , ' • . •t, . „ _,... . . ... .. , ., 1.1116..;1;••• •--- '''` ... .. .*... 1. -• . .....e.e. . ' .X '"...-.-.---. ...,.3.-. • *I 4 ' .. . . t NM= • .. .. • . .. ,. -• •• . . . .-..' ' . •. ' •0. . .....• ' . . , . , •r ,. ... , • -, ' ':Y - '?`•'.., '.4- T'T::7 ''' .tt . •:: -':•iik 1.- ... .:4•Iil '...),.....it,•;•"' :•'!"; , , . 'i ,‘ t oii ili. ' -"11114i . '_ '''' :.."' -•-7 ."444"—iit: , -, ''''' •-..ii".A••••• •ailigiak.v., _,,4,,,,st_,,., ''''-.7.7 -•,mr-, . . . .. ,.. r 11 K as'," fr-70-;at,. ,:„•• ., - - - , s„,• . ";•ff":".!.'r!„. ...:;,•;,-,f1-.--' w . , I_ ,A..'a ' '..,- -.:: .' _#11i.k, . , , , , . . ' . ' -•:." — '4-77-' ' ' - ' ' I, . _ _ r . . • it , .. ' • ,, III Summary of Options Emergency Option Location Underground Generator Location PPL Vault Location Control Pane(s)I Location 10-Year Gravity Cost Impact A To Option 1 Construction Time Recommendation Component Location Storm Piping Bypass Impact(Days) Lincoln Court&Bay Road; Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay 1 SWTS at Lincoln Road Lincoln Rd Rd Rd Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd .4 ✓ $1,805,000 $0 150 Base Control Panels at Lincoln 2 Lincoln Rd 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave Lincoln Ct and Ba Road;All else at 1671 Y Rd I ✓ Preferred $815,000 150 Highly Prefeed SWTS and all EQ to 1671- 3 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave V X Dischar•e at Lincoln Road $4,296,000 $2,491,000 360 Preferred 3A SWTS and EQ to 1671; 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave ✓ X $2,875,000 $1,070,000 325 Preferred Discharge at 17th 4 5-year Storm/10-year Piping Lincoln Rd Lincoln Rd End Lincoln Rd End Lincoln Rd End ✓ V ($2,632,876) ($4,437,876) 90 Not Recommended 4A 5-year Storm/10-year Piping Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Rd Ct and Ba Rd V ✓ &Structures RD Rd Y $2,028,900 $223,900 180 Not Recommended 2 SWTS 4 Lincoln Road&Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln CI and Bay Lincoln Ct and Bay 5 Road Rd RD Rd Lincoln Ct and Bay Rd V ✓ $2,129,076 $324,076 360 Not Recommended I6 SWTS at Lincoln;All EQ at 1671 Lincoln Rd 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave 1671 West Ave V V $1,857,000 $52,000 150 Preferred Upgrade 6"',10"',14"'St SWTS; 6th,10th,l4th, 6th,10th,14th, 7 Downgrade Lincoln SWTS Lincoln 6th,10th,l4th,Lincoln Lincoln 6th,10th,14th,Lincoln V ✓ ($87,000) ($1,892,000) 480 Not Recommended 8 Eliminate Gen Set;SWTS and Lincoln Rd N A Lincoln Ct and Bay Lincoln Ct and Ba Rd ✓ ✓ EQ at Lincoln Rd y $468,537 ($1,336,463) 150 Not Recommended 9 SWTS at Lincoln Rd;All EQ at Lincoln Rd 1625 West Ave 1625 West Ave 1625 West Ave ✓ ✓ 1625 $1,810,000 $5,000 150 Preferred 10 Above Ground EQ CSP Lincoln Rd Gaythering Hotel Gaythering Hotel Gaythering Hotel V ✓ $3,200,000 $1,395,000 Min.420 Not Recommended Gaythering Hotel Engineering & Construction Perspective: Base: D/B Team Recommended Highly Preferred Recommendation Preferred Recommendation Not Recommended 'age o 8 21 ."::3'!..K7,:.,'gov.;•,7„;,,,,7.,•,..1:„.;••..„,:,;,:t. i.:.•z-,;4•.;•••• •-••,.„,:•••• ---,-- '., •,•••,',,,•,,,,,,-4,,,,,,,.,:1,-,1:',„;•..,,,,,•••..•••• ,ii,,••,.,• ••,. ,,,,;„ ,,, . . '.•.,1,-;•••••,•-:'•:,1,''''','--i..--,,--•.i:io:',-;:v..k.-.,;•.,ir:,:•.;:'•.:',.•• '.. :.-• • . - ,•r• '„•1:-,•,',.,0„:,••,,, ,•-14,,,,•:,',;-•-•A•P'...•••,..-• 1:'''." ', • ' .401,r..,:7.441,..,...1::::.,.. ....4.,,,..-:', , ... I . ..• - ' "" •,' ', **" •,•-,----,..,•••4.-. 417';', . -- • - - . _ 1 -4.- !"•.,- .i ,-- --,. . , •.., . •- A• ..',•it.,,!!•:;•••,..!-?•..,... ..1 .- , . .-,.."4."."-*.-,-*"' -- • V ''-•::-'•il 1 ,.,,-, -,•-.._. .:. -, ..,------i,--; •' .ip.p.' -„ -1"..:-.. • , .;`,. , „ ,..,--i,i1.;4-itaiitl.'".; . ' - ,„ ......,_. -,... 'c . • • • ',II - • •..%'" , t., •••1- , ..6., .4.17.,...7....'4'... hi:' ',• 7..: • OP' ''' ,,.,. •, ,. .. 4.. ., .. ' ,..•. " - MOO . . . • ''1''' It.',' .- , ; - . 1!‘4, me API: . .. \c' - ,'.110.141P .,"•',.W ,.*.'..".7..r. , •'1'.15 ,._..,„„, •5 'N\ ', ....;. ....". ..W;" ...f:::.001115. I .."...3 • ,-III A ii -,.• 1 ' \ ' I 411110' ' 1. .."1.Z.11.....A....- - , 4 ' '.. , 1 . •..... 4, ....- _ Storm Water Treatment System Location Options : Design Build Team Recommended Base Comparison: 0 • tion •'.._ 3, Illh . 1.,- 4'4 ,t. .i4,4-1.3l • ..,- •.s .4..- 1.4,co- .. . . .., 4. . ... . t -... t, i . . , . ,, — 2 dr -4 ----.......00 ",.... -AAdi.. t ' . III Option # 1 : Lincoln Court and BayRoad 4* 1 , 4, / . a Imtnimilwr� a tC s a r .;- 4, -LP, i /1. , iiii : . • kilt / • •a'e . o • III Option # 1 : Lincoln Court and Ba Road y 0 .400 I • A+ , . `I q i I s 1 I -• a:Wit. _ = _: s NA .11,x;; ,..-.., _. - .341* --A.,-., ..- .. .. — ,_ 2 III Option # 1 : Lincoln Court and BayRoad .... , , T1,aE a«..1ED I I/ / —.0.11.E OXFUCT _ 33 ,EMUCna[ PROPOSED ORNMRQ INLET EOM.UST 'r N EMEq AND WN t` J / E . -1: 5 L,:-eew mr,emi TmC...EL N ----../4',,t- --- --� / . nx Y a...., u w , f..-11.7.1T / urrnw¢.onaow � u L� I ( Ef �C'EE. Lisill FF EL _3 Lwoln Frald rel'El .t. al-85). 1 : I xis+ 1ECTU,Se..P 4- sem \ l\\} ARCMIELNRPL S;YtFN -R Itl 0.._WRwe Pt 7,41E44 RAID 4.4.0414.4.041iG '•\ A-1,-At, Ts LIE REEtta4D RE REyx.1FT. l PRpy`9ED PlE[1NCRL A.R 9W .— R.ce.WIT Page 176 of 370 24 Option # 1 : Lincoln Court and BayRoad 1450 KR YERIERATLR WCHIEICR.RAL WALE FN.VAULT ERdt1ELTURAL f DRATE Ira 7 WRIER MLL(T1P.? (2 fSOPOSE0DWA( i 21'-A' l OFLPOSED VALLEY ROADWAY n ti t RWUUT VALLEY Flry aM' QI77ER !ryvn........«...qq� s� OUTER QU'- -fE 5[EMALR -I VOLEAUF- 111 15.73- -Thr-cr FLOE UWE 11)(1-0'R.. eSECTION LE:1. 1. AALHRECT". FRCHDELTURFL EWE ORF1E 7,I K OE/aw 4T L rl I • NM MIN I Y alt r■/r1=MEM FT EL�� - a.20' BE.O.+i 061(! _ 111111111110..4.1I I 0 OLEY LL = [. I uRoow RD S4 EET IRC EIS a OM' L r 1y�p• L—L Lecou�Ra 04FE!Tb R0VDRAT O 042205) I'—'�'�I ELEY.kW. F L2V-' =1p RAIROER RALLY I1TF) ORAMN05) CTION SOION Page 177 of 370 2' III Option # 1 : Lincoln Court and BayRoad .. ., SFS �y ■ mo AA , �_ N ■ A z it - ::::, II ■■■ _ _-_ ■l■ BO .. Loss of On-Street Parking - _ = ,, , 4 _ (26) • Emergency Gravity Bypass �. , Space Restriction for .3 .4"1 Deliveries/Drop Offs • Traffic Calming & irk Promenade Atmosphere '��F` - `� Large Structure in Median • Above EQ in proximity of _ Height Concern SWTS < 200' _._� 1 i Perceived Property Loss Advantages Budget Cost: $1 ,805,000 Disadvantages a rI Page 17 - cn_41 .1 . . • t 0 4. ,..i, 4,4 ;11, ..1 I • 3 )111 • 1 II , f _ 0 4,.. k. . , `•4_.tlik -'. " I :ft''',I, $: , * •,,, , . • * Nom• .Ali.__ 1 , • 4'7".'h.--- --livor 11 • co „ ..,..., , Ir. ,. ,l..-- • •• . . ' ••• ‘ = 1 -* i ,'''. ,..., .t - - i. ,..,, , billi< ) ' • V ', • . • . V . -14. l'EP t • ir 4 - , . . . .iir, , /01.., :•. . .al .. •,..-- _.. -i' • ", • , di• A. MI ' 1 :an Milli LI p % "aft Joh t•••i __...,_-• ;.''• / _. (i) • I .; ' '10 adi , • . . VI . _ w : ,......... . . A ''' r .............. ..,...._,_...,—.. 4 ..,....a.,11i. . ...;06 . (D „ We*. .,,,, ,,, , , — 4 e — --- . ii- - -- a .......4 .1, xp M ,...„.. „-,;_• --- - - - : 1 ' i ,... (111) = ".: . / -' ' it " , • .. • - 0 iim 1,g; • , i . 0 . - - 111 - . 3 •< 1 i 7-,' •_, con 1 , .. , 1-,,-. . .. . (11 —4. 1-I ,• i .v. Ji :.........••' al -1 4- 3 yi r ' ., --..- 1 n itt , v / .• = I it i . ' #a• S •\ i.. ..,. • 14 . lk0 • #47""iw‘t 13 0 , e . ,....rwrit, , ...• = •soliiii' ,- 0 . 1.10.1, 4 0 • i z ., PO 44.44444; t. ' 10 . in+ , 1,11Nlimmup . 41, , MEM• . ... .1. 0 t = . .. , (0) IN) • • III Option #2: Control Panels at Lincoln Road ; All Other Components at 1671 West Avenue iv\ 0 � ;lt ,' '"a r r'R' t ~ i Irl -. 4 . W+0PONE ' •�y e " . 7 ' dri ALP 1.11.11111.1.111111111111111111111/ , ••• ' . ' ...,.. - ENCLOSURE AROUND GENERATO AND FPL VAULT (14 PARKING SPACES LOST) West Avenue Page 180 of 370 2/ III Option #2: Control Panels at Lincoln Road ; All Other Components at 1671 West Avenue W -., -7---Z +___ .r - 135 tlD1v 3 a ,;_\ ] 1003 MP .u0 . I!` ,11,1 13 I 4 101.1•3 . t/ r aro+ WWII.•�rr10ALM AI 41 AV ii. Isir I' SN �� main kV' , .. Page 181 of 370 West Avenue 2S Option #2: Control Panels at Lincoln Road ; All Other Components at 1671 West Avenue Parking Recovery: May be able to recover parking on north and South sides of Lincoln Road Street End (Requires Fire Department Approval) May be able to incorporate two parking �x spaces behind the median control panels 1 :Requires Fire Department Approval) f IP 1 I Alt § ' Lincoln Road —_ —-_.-- - Revised Median Dimension: 30.6'x45.7'; Height: 12.5' 97.0'x 17.2'; H e I82124' 3( III Option #2:Control Panels at Lincoln Road ; All Other Components at 1671 West Avenue UTT r---` -ral SIMM Wei Maw -1 y .� 41-----\-` L C_—7 yr i—al-1 ~ C� to �®9ECf1IOM' i A i_____U t i emu._ OHP-..-- 1 1 L Qo-III".— 4/ .,-.-\N-)-- , — J LL-_-3 J L J C___7F 4—� -I `I J(4 secnom Page 183 of 370 31 III Option #2: Control Panels at Lincoln Road ; All Other Components at 1671 West Avenue j� 1 a• Utility Interference/Conflicts 3�.,` , :°. 11 , at the intersection of Lincoln Gravity Overflow Bypass = 'f4,' .., •'/ s . n?1 7 ' Road and West Avenue lc: • Key Controls Close to r .F v. Median Structure SWTS < 200' . *A ii Perceived Property Loss Traffic Calming & '1"41 {4as _.,._,�.M - I Loss of Resident Street Promenade Atmosphere . Parking spots (10) between Possibly Save residential Lincoln Court and Bay Road parking spots at the Lincoln ENCLOSURE AROUND GENERATOR • Loss of Parking Spots (14) at Road Street End (14) AND FPL VAULT 1671 West Avenue (14 PARKING SPACES LOST) Advanta es Budget Cost: $2,620,000 Disadvantages g A To Option 1 : $815,000 g Page 184 of 370 3' # ..r.. .,4. ` s tw • `'. � .M111ffL L 1aaY •.1 r _ y " :f•'_, ts au • 1 {t ♦ .a„• .'SSS ', - sr'+l.T 4',sr R. r _ ii ,� 111 i. tZ - y w r c\ ' _ r Lx 1 t n _ "^ s 4:. tm nt stem Location Options : Storm Water Trea e S y Preferred Recommendations: Options 3 3A, • 6 & 9 1 _°' V -- AP 4y • *' ..... .jamit '�' r #' t^ - - . i�, • ' , .�.i `* .,fes > _�. • .. �.. ,; ►' � ' : . "+� .. r , 3 III Option #3: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave . Discharge to Lincoln Road USPS West Ave- AF Building ' r ,rr�doom r 16. Ir 1 . _ tr I''''' '6--!-----------------------' -. I 444040004 'IAS-"' / 1 ' ENCLOSUREAROUND ''A GENERATOR, CONTROL `' PLATFORM, AND FPL VAULT AIA Court(19 PARKING SPACES LOST) 'age ;•of 310 34 III Option #3: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave . Discharge to Lincoln Road " i �..- n ■IU . N • .44 West Ave. - w wo ., ' i UllArr i , . i ca ...„ „, . , Do Nor ", `,' x, " -- OMNI It . . a ., ' • ... - sipais TA... _ y ERT ER _ -•i dal f--.-- \ '' mico--:„ .)) BELOW GROUND PUMP Ni-- ..,,. STATION FOOTPRINT . (12 PARKING SPACES LOST) „. ,., 00. , , ..-h►187 of 370 3' Option #3: Full SWTSto 1671 West Ave . III Discharge to Lincoln Road E 1 I: it• I -- --_ i i r moo... • • q`a F G1. /1•1 �yG .ti' h -� il Y EP r _ _ _ - I _.. Urcoun Road- 4 - - _ vuv 51.1.21usao.0 CORM. Ii _G P�®" Yd gg a n I: tc1 i wk qi. 1 €i I I a _ _ in in III M g I ; cPage 188 of 370 34 III Option #3: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave. Discharge to Lincoln Road Multiple Force Main - 1,200' !-1:: . 41. ' '''. : - to Lincoln Road/Utility Interferences - Possible r'': DO 401 v w� Tunnel ' tR�.fl ,. Loss of Bypass Emergency - . t Overflow Piping �� Loss of Public Parking (31) \', BELOW GROUND PUMP F Cost Impact: $1.5M > STATION FOOTPRINT s ,'�''. (12 PARKING SPACES LOST) Option 1 • Resident Satisfaction r ,. R - ,, �, Construction Time Impact: ▪ No Loss of On Street Parking 360 Days Advantages Budget Cost: $4,296,000 Disadvantages g o To Option 1 : $2,491 ,000 g Page 189 of 370 3; III IOption #3A: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave. Discharge to 17th Street USPS4. West Ave Building ,� n" R:. ti 4. ill q� x: ■ I r■ /4. -'' 'AO.. ''' 1 row -sr. rli - r sa joilip. . L a4;1I ENCLOSURE AROUND GENERATOR, CONTROL PLATFORM, AND FPL VAULT Alton COU 11 (19 PARKING SPACES LOST) 'age • ot3/U 31 III IOption #3A: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave. Discharge to 17th Street A Q _. 4 West Ave. , a . ^ �. ULM + -.7' a ' c - w•m . ' Si % 111111 T- ,. • , , a — a MI "` DO NOT 4 . ' 1 it 711 r. j.Z.?"' ; ti, . y I r � , E_ m• yar i * w t :'‘....7.' V' ' 11 1 e s' �, • F II Ilk '' BELOW GROUND PUMP .. f.:— v STATION FOOTPRINT .� 4,,,illiol. _ (12 PARKING SPACES LOST) - • - / : . - ..")614 : 3294•,,we / 91 of 370 31 III IOption #3A: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave. Discharge to 17th Street - --\ 1X0,000 GPM at Peak Flow E 5.� GP°P\. • �, into Canal 1' Ili I 4 :., :',,.. i - :. - L 1 \ '"� .4 4-, .....D.. 40/1•4110.......... ,.. 1.--r 0. ..1 EXISTING 17TH ,,\ \ 111 ` y STREET PUMP • STATION ```` \ /r. _ It } rr 17TH STREET e "° r PUMP STA 11 ON DISCHARGE CORRIDOR "'"^"* 1 I'. Page 192 of 370 4( III Option #3A: Full SWTS to 1671 West Ave . Discharge to 17th Street Multiple Force Main 400' to 4 17th Street/Utility • - Interferences - Possible Tunnel . Loss of Bypass Emergency ,,-- 7 Overflow Piping Loss of Public Parking (31) ,�� L IN t; �'`-+ = Cost Impact: $1M > Option 1 ENCLOSURE AROUND Resident Satisfaction GENERATOR, CONTROL ," Construction Time Impact: No Loss of On Street Parking .`', PLATFORM AND FPL VAULT 1? 325 Days (19 PARKING SPACES LOST) liaillik Budget Cost: $2,875,000 Advantages A To Option 1 : $1 ,070,000 Disadvantages Page 193 of 370 41 III Option #6 : Above Ground to 1671 West Ave. SWTS at Lincoln Road USPS West Ave" war .. -� Building - w a� _ N ►1,,, ,,r,. - r� _. "417I':: 1.''.. R f , # DO NOT ,USPS . .�.641? 111111111111111 V t _ iii, ENT CR1 i - i U1114111 . r'` J �I.{ I qiel litic _ r it -' ENCLOSURE AROUND - • _ GENERATOR, CONTROL ° PLATFORM, AND FPL VAULT :. Alton COU y I " 2i '' r (19 PARKING SPACES LOST) .. Page c, o s 4, III Option #6 : Above Ground to 1671 West Ave. SWTS at Lincoln Road W —_I z _ H .'" 1;l 1 l7nn til I . / / M 14 1 Page 195 of 370 West Avenue 4; III Option #6 : Above Ground to 1671 West Ave . SWTS at Lincoln Road I 12'x6' Electrical Platform for Pump Disconnect Panels: P11.4100°' '°° F":67.+" . Safety Switches I I(112,-WP y. w E rY . .Y Due to the distance , eoa 1 „�. Y. between the controlr� Y faa-.YR — — — — panels and the �r 191k I.' L__1, •� underground :: ` ` \- mpo — — ".,"14,SE PPE components of the water �0` ,O T , I T I e. , ` treatment system, we will v i J{ —_-, °i I -�" air V _ � w p .yI — L b be required to install . „,1 •. , ; T:NII1 of - ,u pump disconnect panels ISI. � _ .� tai n it ,«. i �Alll •ai 'Z _— + LMculn Roadfor safe operation _...„..—:;/1 r ..oatI.rIIJ, 1 II m +I n I `a orIl __, moo .. sr o Y,o _ --a to I a.tiNx flK leyy _s--. zi LI/ s � ¢a.o wow. rmfn`" �"" s°` �o maw � Pump Disconnect Switch yo, WM, SYvrtrl, .• •., .:< 1450 LINCOLN o. Dimension: Page 196 of 370 12'X6'; Height: 12' 44 III Option #6 : Above Ground to 1671 West Ave. SWTS S at Lincoln Road Above Ground EQ Isolated > 1,000' to SWTS a M_w � .� DPW Addition of Personnel I '� _ +., and Training to Manage SWTS �� r, sem' 00 NOT rn.. ..�.:. .- ... -�. Operation Required ENT �` _ Added Power and 1 ►,,�► I' I Communication Cables Atior.< - :-.7. - Loss of Public Parking (19) at .,. 1671 ,'`' " ENCLOSURE AROUND . ''' 1,200' to SWTS, No Line of Sight .1c.- GENERATOR,CONTROL _ No Loss of On Street Parking ' . PLATFORM AND FPL VAULT Rv Safety & Maintenance Issues (19 PARKING SPACES LOST) _ ■ Resident Satisfaction Not Best Engineering Practice Budget Cost: $1 ,857,000$52 ,000 Disadvantages Advantages ATo Option 1 : Page 197 of 370 4' III Option #9: Above Ground to 1625 West Ave. SWTS at Lincoln Road , ..4.. rk, t'. +oto; , iti �; ti 3� ` A I D . . \fit. , - .,- %,-",. .ki... AR -86,61. — 4 J 111-' - ,;:t, k w '41"..4''''' , [ w, I MO* - V, 441.1 1 , L. c .mak , ik -' d ENCLOSURE AROUND •'' GENERATOR, CONTROL PLATFORM, AND FPL VAULT `, (8 PARKING SPACES LOST) .. West Avenue venue r . . • III Option #9 : Above Ground to 1625 West Ave . SWTS at Lincoln Road 12'x6' Electrical Platform for Safety Switches Pump Disconnect Panels: w+E fs� '� Due to the distance S j r.�®° WS —V. between the control �,'-- ,. _ _ L.°°" _ panels and the _1 Lunderground � r �7r� 1 __ . % VE-In-is -�°°.. components of the water X11! . ' : ; — , 3 1 treatment system, we will -. 1 , ` '� _ �_�_ be required to install l I• ��f i „•� uncanRead - pump disconnect panels 11 ____ t. for safe operation Iv li - y_ _ 7 tEASS SOLTSCAL .moi.- - . '7,19 n E , / nWO M NEI.. 4-w F[ JJ(/ EOSIN. mw Y" "" �� Pump Disconnect Switch IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPIMIiiiuwr UT r.:."`swfw' 14-50 LINCOLN RD. Dimension: 12'x6'; Height: 12' Page 199 of 370 4; III Option #9 : Above Ground to 1625 West Ave. SWTS at Lincoln Road Above Ground EQ Isolated > 1,000' to SWTS DPW Addition of Personnel and Training to Manage SWTS Operation Required iAdded Power and k: i„ 4 Ch , ;• s t Communication Cables • >-� -- Loss of Public Parking (8) at 1625 0.,ENCLOSURE AROUND - —"` - 1,000' to SWTS, No Line of Resident Satisfaction GENERATOR CONTROL ,..), 1= Sight, Safe Maintenance PLATFORM AND FPL VAULT 9Safety/ Maintenance Ground EQ Isolated (8 PARKING SPACES LOST) Issue No Loss of On-street Parking " • Not Best Engineering Practice Advantages Budget Cost: $1 ,810,000 Disadvantages g A To Option 1 : $5,000 g Page 200 of 370 41 • • . i C c 0 ' `t •� /I '..J: as , ) 0 tF a �. •M Al t 0 'r' ,. . _ - ti F1 }00, 0 ', ¢if- E -0 h i Iltrl _ V ,�► ,i. ,it al) (li � f,.._ . ... 1 igi y E .11;4.: ---_-_. ....... >' E 40\ - N o / MOM a) ce ... AI i, t. .,. a. 1 .� __ o _ .. .„. ] ff//jjffJJl! u j/((j i ..• '1:16' 4. . , .... riiik h , • a) __ . .„, . 1,1.„._0 P14-TI , .. \.....:..i, *Hip, ) q , i ., . :, -= ' - 1..4,1 g„,,,I ttitti ,° t _ Ilt E : 0p III Option #4: 5 -year Storm - 10 -year Piping Only i =g" II, t • Perceived Property Loss sb. Ic' MOW. v /' V -; IS .:� . I.;.4. = • Future Construction ,lia.1i1Considerations 10 year Gravity Overflow Bypass F � • Above Ground Structures Above EQ Proximity to _ r 1 f ' °' Blocking Views �� BI k'ng V'e SWTS < 200 s #�€ >a,..... -- �� - L,,�;,.1, - Loss of Resident Street t' �` ; Parking (16) • Cost Savings $4.4M _` < Option 1 '\ -.-- • Violates Commission ham,I Resolution / Loss of Pump Capacity Advantages Budget Cost: $($2,632,876) Disadvantages g A To Option 1 : ($4,437,876) g Page 202 of 370 5( IIIOption #4A: 5 -year Storm - 10 -year Footprint 7_ _ Space Restrictions/ Deliveries, Drop Off a _ _ m Perceived Property Loss ^i , , , ._ , ,,,,, rr C 12j Large Structure in Median Gravity Overflow _rJ' ✓ Height Concerns Bypass - -11 1 / i!!!1 1!lI1 ..,....n Road 'r ^..� m Loss of Resident Street Above EQ Proximity toy — ani f�i III Parking (26) SWTS < 200' \ HR Violates Commission -1 I Resolution / Loss of Pump Capacity Advanta es Budget Cost: $2,028,900 Disadvantages g A To Option 1 : $223,900 g Page 203 of 370 51 III Option #5 : Two Water Treatment Systems Bay Road & Lincoln Road Ffil _—._ =.gem nr�u� __--____..___-■ Gravity Overflow Loss of Resident Street Bypasses !sm � „_r f / Parking (12) ■ Redundancy: 2 - � I�I'� , ,� , • Structures Blocking Views 60,000 gpm SWTS , . iT 1 r ll Multiple Locations • Space Limitations Locations Alt. Location ' �i —' Ir 1450 All Above • •• Advantages Budget Cost: $2,129,076 Disadvantages g 0 To Option 1 : $324,076 g Page 204 of 370 5' III Option #5 : Genset & FPL Vault at 1441 . . .„..... .....,....._ , ......, ..,...„. . ......, ,,,r , ‘ . ,. ,, ,,, _ ,,, __, ,, ,I .,„,"-- . '. �s � ii e 1. m AA1 -4 +es ♦, '. ,,,y I. „.. ., .- ,........-.7,,...,„:7,:." ,4.4 x � 4 '' ENCLOSURE AROUND , w CONTROL PLATFORM \\__ "� ENCLOSURE AROUND FPL I; VAULT AND GENERATOR � �• �. (8 PARKING SPACES LOST) ti" .age I o '`I „`. III Option #5 : Ba Road Location i.. xs Us 0 _ \ F---•---- % _.....x ,.. , a r.).,,attlai a a y• :: , . . ks H . . -,- , • H H Ilr—fr H N5x, V' 1.,t,til,I,160 ' 1 -4.* A s •N o. I sA. I-H -V 5TC6r,1,R4r.e.v.E--. Ti '44frItiii".iiie''-,.,,. I ..,.:;, ..- 1' t -41111111111 1 I Illa 111.1;•.-a. , \ • i i A\ \ 14V.,. 01.1.SPAITme ,I , SIVA:T.0C :-• , 1 er.,....•., 'I . . \\' A';„ .,....., 1 x , rT2ki , • . I I + I I7 RL,..LT i piptarycy \ Far,o, ---, rthtNA-Tak ‘. Page 206 of 370 54 III Option #5 : BayRoad Location ,r,...., , 1 2.--......, . ... . .•, . . ,, , , ,. . _ _______ .. • ma' 114- --4 .. ,_ , Ii . ,n l'P III illi it t . a ► ir„,,,,,,, Iff mi ', _ . I : '''': . If II/ I N1 1 i w • Ts 1L. .... , 1401 4111M— -11 iimill • - u ._ M y @@� 1 1.,,,..,.., 91 q,,,,,,�I,, �,,Iti,,II,, a 7.4111i1110111 ..IuI��1II��I I kl III II i��, ,,„, ,,,, ,r RAMI Illflil I. o I - , ,-.ENCLOSURE AROUND r .2.,, CONTROL PLATFORM (2 PARKING SPACES LOST) 'age 1 0 0 .. 5' III Option #5 : BayRoad Location a ' . Y ., ". o•v. t 10 7y. 1''i't' '' — 4*‘ ' 1 «x r _ �li • . luu ENCLOSURE AROUND FPL • VAULT AND GENERATOR — (2 PARKING SPACES LOST) y w. .. . . ,..., .. ... v.. ,_ . , 5 Option #7: 6th Street IIIUpgrade 6th, 10th & 14th St. Storm Water Treatment Systems & Lincoln Road to 60,000 gpm i . "MZ:-:r•-,..2 .... 1 r } 'ti I Cost Savings: $3M f .--- "� ‘ ' �- ' %i-7. _-,L Design Upgrades to Three < Option 1 v , \tr it - -�- -., ,r„.r:.t . = -...,,t,„.... - -- (3) Existing Pump Stations .9. ._�. air��. .� "' _Addresses Regulatory Issues :� w; ==� ., .2, - Capacity/Efficiency * �. ' ,H �. Downsize Lincoln Road r, ' ° _v,, Water Treatment System Reduction in Storm Water �`t- _ PREunr/AAR), - Pipe Sizes _ � �* Project Delay: 480 Days Budget Cost: $($87,000) Advantages ATo Option 1 : ($1 ,892,000) Disadvantages _ _ la= r , ...:. Page 209 of 370 R v - 1 I- 5; Option #8: Eliminate Gen Set at Lincoln Road 5 ;, / �r II I Gravity Overflow Bypass Minimize Median incuMl Read �- J, Obstruction = wrt Cost Savings: $1.3M < `, / Loss of Emergency Back-up Option 1 Power Budget Cost: $468,537 eS Disadvanta Advantages A To Option 1 : ($1 ,336,463) g Page 210 of 370 51 IIIOption # 10: SWTS at Lincoln Rd; All EQ Above Ground at Gaythering Hotel iEXISTING �,� 5 STORY MOM 1.-- "GAYTNER°VG" r a IF °" a taevr 1 CArx2. epa Emergency Gravity Bypass 1 - d"° a ' 44US[ p EL If R • Y I t '... 3 axs t RO .i;, nws1r c d r r, Above EQ in Proximity of •�• �' Nu.. I ' 3 SSI SWTS i 1 ' 1 MI , 1 Resident Satisfaction girt,, ♦ T Loss of Street Parking No Impact to Construction A .-I-'=•ri Pttl. mItt: .trouts: -�� r' Requires Agreement Duration ° ,.,N:,.,. :� between Property Owner • GATE ACCESS GATE ACCESS HMI TO CONTF0.PANEL 6 FRY/WIT LOAORIG WM Minimal Cost Impact LOAING 20F `a °E` and City EXTENDED FACADE 4. Advantages 4" Disadvantages -Milli ails: s O H-I D .= �_=sseu ,. ...,'40.--�. .. f _...41.111- ,. .. 4 .. ✓RAW aes� . 4 I _. Page 211 of 370 ENCLOSED AF3OVE GROUND ELEVATION 51 dna ',t v '� ..,k it4- ':"P91' y 7. y i, ^ 4 "Illiall _ i ?PP 4.0 ". . : 1iti } � ... . L. ,I r .. : . .. , it': ,•r ' ' i . • it :'': 1 E`.�;, l•�1 • �u.w.a • "r.. ♦.J i anal _ , .�. k' til j .._ ti - _ '• `t It ^ + ...0014.1 '. 4, • i. 6 ill , .; AIN.. .. , .1, .. L , , . Neighborhood Benefits . . ..,. . .. ., ,, ,, .. . .. , . . ...., • � . .. . _., • ,,. ..•, $17-1tt f� `r r .. • 61 Project Benefits for Neighborhood 4113 1 2 3 Prevents current street Improves City's storm Landscape flooding during high water management improvements and tides and sea level rise system for over 147 enhancements at all protection. Acres in the West Ave. local street ends. neighborhood to 10- year flood events. Page 213 of 370 6 Water Quality Improvements DERM approved Addition of CDS Vortex addition of wells to units at Lincoln Road PS manage initial surge for continuous during heavy rain and screening of solids up flooding events. to 120 microns. Page 214 of 370 Thank you ! CON ? Fl, INC. CIS 4 Page 215 of 37 �RACK,ftOR+off CONSULTANTS