The URL can be used to link to this page

41st ST CONCEPTUAL PLAN SLIDESHOWGO#40: 41 STREET CORRIDOR Commission Meeting January 13, 2021 www.GOMBInfo.com GO#40: 41 STREET CORRIDOR GO#40: 41 STREET CORRIDOR www.GOMBInfo.com BUDGET DESIGN COMPROMISE Today’s Request from the Administration: •Approval of the concept being presented; •Authorization to issue an RFQ for the selection of a firm to advance the project to its next phase of design. GO#40: 41 STREET CORRIDOR www.GOMBInfo.com 41ST STREETCORRIDOR: Conceptual Streetscape Design Commission Meeting 9ÂçØöɷɹʍɸɶɸɷ 41st Street Design: Background Alta-Gehl conducted studies of the area, engaged the community with extensive resident and business outreach, then presented a Vision Plan with findings, ideas & recommendations that could help to inform a future design process with the G.O. Bond Program. AECOM has produced a conceptual streetscape design that follows the recommendations of Alta-Gehl, incorporates all recent and prior stakeholder feedback, meets all necessary state and county compliance standards, and is actually feasible to implement within the $15 million total G.O. Bond project budget. Conceptual Design: Process Over 30 plan documents reviewedand project matrix developed Feasibility and constraints analysis of over 60 proposed projects 15 interviews with CMB departments and 1 Meeting with Blue-Ribbon Committee Stakeholder outreach with Miami-Dade County and FDOT City of Miami Beach Review of 2 Conceptual Design Alternatives 1 Public Meeting and 1 Public Survey to review 2 Conceptual Design Alternatives Outreach to Business Community 3 Presentations to the Mayor’sBlue-Ribbon Committee 3 Presentations to the G.O. Bond Committee 1 Presentation to the Neighborhoods/Quality of Life Committee 2Presentations to Commission 2 Conceptual Streetscape Design Alternatives 1 Hybrid Conceptual Streetscape Design Conceptual Design: Analysis Overview FDOT Evacuation Route: Roadway width to remain as current condition Setbacks: Design to consider setbacks for lighting, drainage, signs, structures Min. setback distance for trees/palms to be based on above/ belowground utilities and approvals FDOT Design Compliance: Design to meet standard plans for sight distance at intersections, aesthetic features, roadside safety, lateral RƬVHWV Landscape: Context sensitive plantings to consider site conditions Signaling: New signal upgrades to be incorporated in design Utilities: Utility survey needed during, future design development Design to minimize impacts to utilities Speed: FDOT facilitiy with posted speed limit of 30MPH BERT Plan: No dedicated bus lane currently planned Maintenance: Consider cost of sidwalk/ crossing improvements Royal Palms: Consider cost of removal and compliance with Forestry Master Plan Lighting: Incorporate recent tree-light wrapping project completed 2020 and upcoming OLJKWƮ[WXUHXSGDWH 15M total G.O. Bond Budget Resiliency/ Sustainability: Identify best practices and review feasible improvements Existing Conditions: Pedestrian Conflicts Existing Conditions: Landscape Conflicts Existing Conditions: Narrow Sidewalks Existing Conditions: Heat Index Conceptual Design: Alternatives Developed Concept 1: All in on 41st! Concept 2: Connect the Community! Answered: 157 Skipped: 2 Scheme 1: Remove ALL on 41st Scheme 2: Keep Some on 41st 43.31% 56.69% Which On-Street PARKING option do you prefer? Answered: 158 Skipped: 1 Scheme 1: Widened Sidewalk Scheme 2: Flexible Sidewalk/ Parking 57.89% 42.41% Which SIDEWALK option do you prefer? Answered: 158 Skipped: 1 Scheme 1: Branded Paver Design Scheme 2: Colored Textured Concrete 57.59% 42.41% Which sidewalk MATERIAL option do you prefer? Answered: 149 Skipped: 10 Do you ________ in the 41st Street neighborhood? Live Work Play 25.5% 8% 16.7% %Live and Work Live and Play Work and Play Live, Work and Play 6% 6% 17.4% 20.1% 159 Total ResponseÜ 41st Street: Conceptual Streetscape Design Preference Survey Answered: 154 Skipped: 5 Scheme 1: Fixed Seating Throughout Scheme 2: Fixed Seating at Midblock 42.86% 57.14% Which SEATING option do you prefer? Answered: 157 Skipped: 2 Would you like to see a GATEWAY FEATURE as you enter the 41st Street Corridor? YES NO 78.34% 21.66% Answered: 157 Skipped: 2 Would you prefer more BICYCLE PARKING on 41st Street OR on the side streets? More bicycle parking on 41st Street only More bicycle parking on the side streets only More bicycle parking on both 41st Street AND the side streets 10.1% 50.32% 39.49% Answered: 158 Skipped: 1 Scheme 1: Replace with Shade Tree Scheme 2: Keep Royal Palms 38.61% 61.39% Which SHADE option do you prefer? 159 Total ResponseÜ 41st Street: Conceptual Streetscape Design Preference Survey Which streetscape scheme is your preference overall? Prefer Scheme 2Prefer Scheme 1 51% 159 Total ResponseÜ 41st Street: Conceptual Streetscape Design Preference Survey Conceptual Design Conceptual Design: AltaGehlVision Key Themes SAFETY + SECURITY QUALITY OF LIFE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE BICYCLE + PEDESTRIAN VEHICULAR PUBLIC TRANSIT •Improved crossing •Pedestrian buffers •Improved shade cover •Seating •Public art •Tree canopy + context sensitive plantings •Resiliency improvements •Widened sidewalks •Bicycle parking •On street parking removal •Median enhancements •Bus shelter improvements •Gateway elements Project Boundary: 41st Street + Side Streets Conceptual Rendering: 41stStreet Sidewalk Widening Recommendations: Full Corridor >10 ft 6 1~9 9 ft W. 41st Street - H Ƭ H U V R Q $ Y H Q X H $ O W R Q 5 R D G 1DX W L O X V ' U L Y H 0H U L G L D Q $ Y H Q X H &K D V H $ Y H Q X H 3 U D L U L H $Y H Q X H 3U D L U L H $ Y H Q X H 5R \ D O 3 D O P $ Y H Q X H W. 40th StreetW. 40th Street *D U G H Q $Y H Q X H 6K H U L G D Q $ Y H Q X H 3LQ H 7 U H H ' U L Y H W. 42QG Street Project Limit Existing shade treeExisting bus shelter Constrained by existing EXLOGLQJDQGLQVXƱFLHQW setback Limited width between face of curb and edge of residential properties Existing bus shelter 6LGHZDON:LGWK Over 10 Feet 6.1~9.9 Feet 6 Feet /HVVWKDQ)HHW &RQVWUDLQV Subject to change based on analysis during future design phases On-Street Parking Remove and Remain Recommendations: Full Corridor PARKING COUNT 41ST STREET - REMOVED (18) 41ST STREET - TO REMAIN (43) W. 41st Street - H Ƭ H U V R Q $ Y H Q X H $ O W R Q 5 R D G 1DX W L O X V ' U L Y H 0H U L G L D Q $ Y H Q X H &K D V H $ Y H Q X H 3 U D L U L H $Y H Q X H 3U D L U L H $ Y H Q X H 5R \ D O 3 D O P $ Y H Q X H W. 40th StreetW. 40th Street *D U G H Q $Y H Q X H 6K H U L G D Q $ Y H Q X H 3LQ H 7 U H H ' U L Y H W. 42QG Street Project Limit Parking (-1) To widen sidewalk Parking (-1) To widen sidewalk Parking (-1) 7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJplanting and to widen sidewalk Parking (-1) 7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJSODQWLQJ and shade Parking (-1) 7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJ planting and shade Parking (-1)7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJSODQWLQJ and shade Parking (-2) 7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJSODQWLQJ and to widen sidewalk Parking (-2) To add planting and seating at mid-block crossing Parking (-1) To widen sidewalk Parking (-1) 'XHWRFRQưLFWZLWKSDUNLQJdriveway Parking (-2)'XHWRFRQưLFWZLWKparking driveway Parking (-1) Proposed bike corral Parking (-1)7RDGGWUDƱFcalming planting Parking (-1)7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJSODQWLQJ and to widen sidewalk Parking (-1) 7RDGGWUDƱFFDOPLQJSODQWLQJ and to widen sidewalk Parking (-4) To add planting and seating at mid-block crossing Parking (-4)To add planting and seating at mid-block crossing P P PPP P P P P 41st Street 2Q6WUHHW3DUNLQJ5HPRYHG 2Q6WUHHW3DUNLQJWR5HPDLQ 6LGH6WUHHWV 2Q6WUHHW3DUNLQJ5HPRYHG 2Q6WUHHW3DUNLQJWR5HPDLQ Subject to change based on analysis during future design phases 41st6WUHHW3DUNLQJ5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ VW6W7RWDO6SDFHV VW6W3HUFHQWUHPDLQLQJ 6LGH6WUHHWV7RWDO6SDFHV 6LGH6WUHHWV3HUFHQWUHPDLQLQJ Trees Relocate and Remain Recommendations: Full Corridor TREE COUNT W. 41ST STREET Royal Palms Removed (58) Royal Palms to Remain (146) Other Palms Removed (18) Other Palms to Remain (29) Small Trees Recommanded to Removed (3 Canopy Trees Added (28) SIDE STREETS W. 41st Street - H Ƭ H U V R Q $ Y H Q X H $ O W R Q 5 R D G 1DX W L O X V ' U L Y H 0H U L G L D Q $ Y H Q X H &K D V H $ Y H Q X H 3 U D L U L H $Y H Q X H 3U D L U L H $ Y H Q X H 5R \ D O 3 D O P $ Y H Q X H W. 40th StreetW. 40th Street *D U G H Q $Y H Q X H 6K H U L G D Q $ Y H Q X H 3LQ H 7 U H H ' U L Y H Project Limit W. 42QG Street 41st Street 5R\DO3DOPVWR5HORFDWH 5R\DO3DOPVWR5HPDLQ 2UQDPHQWDO3DOPVWR5HORFDWH 2UQDPHQWDO3DOPVWR5HPDLQ 2UQDPHQWDO7UHHVWR5HORFDWH &DQRS\7UHHV$GGHG 6LGH6WUHHWV &DQRS\7UHHVWR5HORFDWH &DQRS\7UHHVWR5HPDLQ &DQRS\7UHHV$GGHG Subject to change based on analysis during future design phases SUBTOTAL TOTAL % REMAINING 14658 204 72% 29 18 47 62% 32 67 48% 318 -111 207 65% 125 TYPES Royal Palms to RemainRoyal Palms to be RelocatedSubtotal Royal Palms Ornamental Palms to Remain Ornamental Palms to be Relocated Subtotal Ornamental Palms Canopy Trees Remaining Canopy Trees to be RelocatedOrnamental Trees 5HORFDWHG Subtotal Other Trees TOTAL PALMS AND TREES TODAY LESS PALMS AND TREES TO BE RELOCATED SUBTOTAL ALL REMAINING PLUS CANOPY TREES TO BE ADDEDTOTAL PALMS AND TREES* 332 *Final count subject to further analysis during the design development phase. Total count is for 41st Street and the Side steets. Illustrative Plan - H Ƭ H U V R Q A v e n u e A l t o n R o a d Me r i d i a n A v e n u e Ch a s e A v e n u e Pr a i r i e A v e n u e Ro y a l P a l m A v e n u e W. 40th StreetW. 40th Street Sh e r i d a n A v e n u e Pin e T r e e D r i v e W. 41st Street 01 02 03 Illustrative Plan: Segment 1 from Alton Rd to Jefferson Ave W. 41st St. W. 41st S t . Me r i d i a n A v e . Me r i d i a n A v e . 4 0 t h S t 1 - H Ƭ H U V R Q $ Y H ƺ ƺ ƻ Ƹ Ƹ ƿ ǀ ƸƷ Bus Bay Bus Bay Bus Bay FUTURE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL (in coordination with CMB signal/crossing improvements)Ƹ ƻ ƸƷ ƸƷ Ƽƾ GAT E W A Y E L E M E N T ƻ ƾ ƺ ƸƷ Ƹ Ƽ ƿƹ ƽ ǀ PATTERNED COLORED CON-CRETE LEGEND POURED CONCRETE PAVING 7(;785('&5266,1* 0(',$1 COLOR/TEXTURED PARKING BIKE RACK (4-5 PER BLOCK) BENCH (4-5 PER BLOCK) TRASH & RECYCLE (4-5 PER BLOCK) SEATWALLS LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT NEW CANOPY TREE ƽ Not to scale Illustrative Plan: Segment 2 from Meridian Ave to Prairie Ave W. 41st St. Pr a i r i e A v e . Pr a i r i e A v e . Ch a s e A v e . Ch a s e A v e . Me r i d i a n A v e . ƾ ƿ ƸƷƻƻƽƺ Ƽ Bus Bay Bus BayBus Bay Bus Bay Ƹ ƻǀƸ ƹ ƸƷ ƸƷ ƸƷ ƸƷ ƹ ƻ ƻ ƺ ƺ BICYCLE TURN LANES (in coordination with CMB bicycle improvements) PROPOSED BICYCLE CORRAL ENHANCED BICYCLE /$1(ZLWKoEXƬHU (in coordination with CMB bicycle improvements) EXISTING CITI BICYCLE STATION TO EXISTING BICYCLE LANE ON W 42nd STREETƻ ƾ ƺ ƸƷ Ƹ Ƽ ƿƹ ƽ ǀ PATTERNED COLORED CON-CRETE LEGEND POURED CONCRETE PAVING 7(;785('&5266,1* 0(',$1 COLOR/TEXTURED PARKING BIKE RACK (4-5 PER BLOCK) BENCH (4-5 PER BLOCK) TRASH & RECYCLE (4-5 PER BLOCK) SEATWALLS LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT NEW CANOPY TREE Not to scale Illustrative Plan: Segment 3 from Royal Palm Ave to Pine Tree Dr Pin e T r e e D r . Sh e r i d a n A v e . Sh e r i d a n A v e . Ro y a l P a l m A v e . W. 41st St. ƺ ƾƿƸƷ Ƹ ƽƼ E X P A N D E D P E D E S T RIAN ZONE Bus Bay Bus Bay ƻ ƾ ƺ ƸƷ Ƹ Ƽ ƿƹ ƽ ǀ PATTERNED COLORED CON-CRETE LEGEND POURED CONCRETE PAVING 7(;785('&5266,1* 0(',$1 COLOR/TEXTURED PARKING BIKE RACK (4-5 PER BLOCK) BENCH (4-5 PER BLOCK) TRASH & RECYCLE (4-5 PER BLOCK) SEATWALLS LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT NEW CANOPY TREE ǀƻ ƿ ƺ ƹ ƹ ƹ ƹ ƸƷ ƻ ƸƷ ƸƷ ƸƷ ƻƻ ƻ PROGRAMMED BIKE LANE ZLWKoEXƬHU HENRY LIEBMAN SQUARE recommended upgrades during future design phases BIKE TURN LANES EXISTING CITI BIKE STATION ƺ Not to scale Illustrative Plan: Materials Final materials to be finalized during Design Development and should consider resiliency factors such as: optimizing concrete mix for carbon emission reduction, lighter color palettes to reduce heat absorbtion, plantings that promote carbon sequestration and reduce heat island effect, and other co-benefits that support air quality, runoff, or community well-being. P A T T E RNED CO L O R E D C O N C R E T E Ƹ POUR E D C O N C R E T E ƹ COLOR /T E X T U R E D P A R K I N G ƻ TEXTURE D C R O S S I N G /M E D I A N ƺ T R A S H & R E C Y C L E ƾ BI K E R A C K Ƽ B E N C H ƽ LANDSC A P E E N H A N C E M E N T ǀ NEW C A N O P Y T R E E ƸƷ SE A T W A L L S ƿ HA R D S C A P E FU R N I S H I N G S IN T E G R A T E D W A L L S SO F T S C A P E Proposed Enhancement: Landscape Modification 41st St between Prairie Ave + Royal Palm Ave Existing Condition: Landscape Conflicts Existing Mid-Block Crossing EXISTING 41st St between Prairie Ave + Royal Palm Ave Proposed Enhancement: Landscape Modification Mid-Block Crossing PROPOSED 41st St between Prairie Ave + Royal Palm Ave Conceptual Section 3: 41st Street between Royal Palm + Sheridan Ave 16 Schematic Section 3: 41st between Royal Palm + Sheridan Ave To Royal Palm Ave To Sheridan Ave 10’~1 2 ’ 10’~1 2 ’ Proposed Condition: Expanded Sidewalk and Increased Landscape Buffer 41st St between Prairie Ave + Royal Palm Ave Existing Condition: Narrow Sidewalk EXISTING 41st St between Royal Palm Ave + Sheridan Ave Existing Condition: Narrow Sidewalk EXISTING 41st St between Prairie Ave + Royal Palm Ave Existing Mid-Block Crossing Proposed Condition: Expanded Sidewalk and Increased Landscape Buffer Mid-Block Crossing PROPOSED 41st St between Prairie Ave + Royal Palm Ave Proposed Condition: New Tree Canopy and Enhanced Parking/Sidewalk Condition Prairie Ave Existing Condition: Heat Index and Narrow Sidewalk EXISTING Prairie Ave Proposed Condition: New Tree Canopy and Enhanced Parking/Sidewalk Condition PROPOSED Prairie Ave CASE STUDY: CASTRO STREET, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 2% o 6 , ' ( : $ / . ([LVWLQJqFXUE o 6 , ' ( : $ / . o 3 $ 5 . , 1 * )752: 35$,5,($9(52<$/3$/0 SIDE STREET DESIGN o 3 $ 5 . , 1 * o % , . ( / $ 1 ( o % , . ( / $ 1 ( o ' 5 , 9 ( / $ 1 ( o ' 5 , 9 ( / $ 1 ( 1%1%2% o % 8 ) ) ( 5 o % 8 ) ) ( 5 Conceptual Section 4: Prairie Ave Proposed Condition: Landscape Modification and Relocation of Sidewalk Amenities 41st St between Chase Ave + Prairie Ave Existing Condition: Pedestrian Conflicts Bus Bay EXISTING 41st St between Chase Ave + Prairie Ave Proposed Condition: Landscape Modification and Relocation of Sidewalk Amenities Bus Bay PROPOSED 41st St between Chase Ave + Prairie Ave Conceptual Section 2: 41st Street between Chase + Prairie Ave 15 Schematic Section 2: 41st between Chase + Prairie Ave. To Chase Ave To Prairie Ave 10’~1 2 ’ 10’~1 2 ’ Proposed Condition: Landscape Modification and Relocation of Sidewalk Amenities 41st St between Jefferson Ave + Meridian Ave Existing Condition: Pedestrian Conflicts EXISTING 41st St between Jefferson Ave + Meridian Ave Proposed Condition: Landscape Modification and Relocation of Sidewalk Amenities PROPOSED 41st St between Jefferson Ave + Meridian Ave Conceptual Section 1: 41st Street between 40th + N. Jefferson 14 Schematic Section 1: 41st between 40th + N. Jefferson To N. Jefferson Ave To 40th Street 6’~12 ’ 6’~12 ’ Conceptual Design: Main Features Structural and Aesthetic Enhancements Main Features of the Concept Design Widened Sidewalks Created 4 Programmable Mid-Block Crossings Branded Sidewalks Enhanced Crossing and Median Increased Shade Human Scale Landscaping Sculptural Seating Resolved ɾɾ ]ãØãÜÕ Conflicts along ɺɷÜã]ãØã Bicycle Lanes (Side Streets Only) Bicycle Parking Gateway Element (Corridor Entry) Expanded 18 Sidewalk Segments for Enhanced Streetscape ¼ ¼ ó ¼ ç Ü Ø Õ Ø Ü Â ã È Â Õ ã ʣ ¼ ó ¼ Ü ¯ © Â Â Ø Ü ç ¸ ã ã È ¨ ç Øã Ø Â ¼ ö Ü ¯ Ü Conceptual Design: What this is and What comes next What this is Conceptual Design Review of AltaGehl vision plan Blue Ribbon Committee Meeting and G.O. Bond Committee review Interviews with City of Miami Beach Departments City of Miami Beach review Review of existing plans and FDOT guidelines Public outreach, preference survey, business community outreach Review of existing City plans and proposed, recommended plans One hybrid conceptual design with order of magnitude cost estimate within G.O. Bond budget Order of magnitude cost estimate within G.O. Bond budget Blue Ribbon Committee Meeting and G.O. Bond Committee review Two conceptual design schemes created Final Presentations with Neighborhoods, Quality of Life Committee, and Commission meetings Conceptual Design: What this is and What comes next What comes next Design Development Block-by-block detailed design analysis with materials review Sustainability and resiliency considerations reviewed Utility examination and improvement plan Project Development and Environment study Possible ITS and signals review based on design with street survey Committee + City review of design development plan Arborist evaluation of tree conditions Detailed cost estimate based on revised design Parking analysis outcomes and coordination Design Review Board Bicycle and transportation infrastructure coordination Detailed design development for use in construction Conceptual Design: Next Steps Review Existing Plans + Project Feasibility Conduct Stakeholder Interviews and Lead Outreach Develop Schematic Streetscape Design Conduct Stakeholder Engagement: Blue Ribbon Committee, G.O. Bond Committee, and Public Meeting Final Concept + Final Presentations with Neighborhoods + Quality of Life Committee WE ARE HERE Final Concept + Commission Meeting