The URL can be used to link to this page

Professional Services Agreement w/ PERKINS & WILL ARCHITECTS CITY CLERK OFFICE: RAFAEL GRANADO or LILIA CARDILLO DATE: 8/24/2020 FROM : Valerie Velez/Jorge Gueimunde DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT EXTENSION : 7490 CONTRACT: RFQ-2019-209-ND- Resiliency Code Consultant Services CONTRACTOR: Perkins and Will Architects Inc. COMMISSION DATE: 10-16-2019 ITEM NUMBER: C5 V RESOLUTION : 2019-31031 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND PERKINS &WILL ARCHITECTS • FOR MIAMI BEACH RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES PURSUANT TO RFQ-2019-209-ND This Professional Se ices Agreement(Agreement) is entered into this A day of August, 2020, between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139 (the"City"), and PERKINS &WILL ARCHITECTS, INC., a Corporation, whose address is 2800 Ponce De Leon Blvd, #1300 Coral Gables FL 33134("Consultant"). SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS Agreement: This Agreement between the City and Consultant, including any exhibits and amendments thereto. City Manager: The chief administrative officer of the City. City Manager's Designee: The City staff member who is designated by the City Manager to administer this Agreement on behalf of the City. The City Manager's designee shall be Carmen Sanchez, Deputy Planning Director, Planning Department. Consultant: For the purposes of this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to be an independent contractor, and not an agent or employee of the City. Services: All services, work and actions by the Consultant performed or undertaken purl 6 ant to the Agreement. Fee; Amount paid to the Consultant as compensation for Services. Proposal Documents: Proposal Documents shall mean City of Miami Beach, RFQ, No.2019-209- ND for MIAMI BEACH RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTING SERVICES, together with all amendments thereto, issued by the.City in contemplation of this Agreement, RFQ,and the Consultant's proposal in response thereto ('Proposal"), all of which are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the following order of precedent shall prevail: this Agreement; the RFQ, and the Proposal. 1 - Risk Manager: The Risk Manager of the City, with offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Third Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139; telephone number(305) 673-7000, Ext. 6435; and fax number(305)673-7023. SECTION 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 In consideration of the Fee to be paid to Consultant by the City, Consultant shall provide the work and services described in Exhibit"A" hereto(the"Services"). Although Consultant may be provided with a schedule of the available hours to provide its Services,the City shall not control nor have the right to control the hours of the Services performed by the Consultant; where the Services are performed (although the City will provide Consultant with the appropriate location to perform the Services);when the Services are performed,including how many days a week the Services are performed; how the Services are performed,or any other aspect of the actual manner and means of accomplishing the Services provided. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ail Services provided by the Consultant shall be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit"A"and to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager. If there are any questions regarding the Services to be performed, Consultant should contact the following person; Carmen Sanchez, Deputy Planning Director Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 (305)673-7000 Ext. 26167 CarmenSanchez(?a.miarnibeachfl.gov 2.2 Consultant's Services, and any deliverables incident thereto, shall be completed in accordance with the timeline and/or schedule in Exhibit"C' hereto. SECTION 3 TERM The term of this Agreement ("Term") shall commence upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, and shall have an initial term of three (3) years, with two (2) additional one (1) renewal options, to be exercised at the City Manager's sole option and discretion, by providing Consultant with written notice of same no less than thirty(30) days prior to the expiration of the initial term. Notwithstanding the Term provided herein, Consultant shall adhere to any specific timelines, schedules, dates, and/or performance milestones for completion and delivery of the Services, as same is/are set forth in the timeline and/or schedule referenced in Exhibit"C" hereto. 2 • 7 SECTION 4 FEE 4.1 In consideration of the Services to be provided, Consultant shall be compensated for completed Tasks on a fixed fee basis, in the aggregate amount of$1,133,360.00, in accordance with the Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit"B" attached hereto. 4.2 Reimbursable Expenses Not To Exceed in the amount of$42,800.00 4.3 Services will be billed monthly upon the completion of each task, in accordance with Fee Schedule in Exhibit"B" hereto. 4.4 INVOICING Upon receipt of an acceptable and approved invoice, payment(s)shall be made within forty-five (45) days for that portion (or those portions) of the Services satisfactorily rendered (and referenced in the particular invoice). invoices shall include a detailed description of the Services(or portions thereof) provided, and shall be submitted to the City at the following address: Payables@rniamibeachfl.gov SECTION 5 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 5.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project .4 Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with a1ny supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: Cost of reproduction, courier,and postage and handling of drawings,plans,specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its Subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its Subconsultants). Costs for'reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). 5.2 Reimbursable Expenses are an allowance set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project, provided such expenses are authorized in advance by the City. The Reimbursable Expenses allowance, as specified herein, belongs to, and shall be co trolled by the City (i.e. unused portions will be retained by the City and shall not be paid to Co sultant). Only approved travel-related expenses authorized by the City will be reimbursed to the Consultant,in an amount not-to-exceed the agreed-upon amount in 3 accordance with Fee Schedule in Exhibit"B"hereto , and in accordance with City-wide Procedure OD. 20.01 (Travel on City Business), as may be updated by the City from time to time ("Reimbursable Expenses"). Notwithstanding the aboke, any Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the corresponding Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material required to support the amount invoiced, and as requested by the corresponding Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Only actual amounts incurred and paid (requiring proof of payment) by the Consultant shall be invoiced, without any markups and/or additions. SECTION 6 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or an hourly fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "B"hereto),with a"Not to Exceed"amount; Reimbursable Expenses(if any)with a"Not to Exceed" amount;the amended Construction Cost Budget(if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services;and an amended Project Schedule(if applicable)."Not to Exceed"shall mean the maximum cumulative hourly fees allowable (or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses, the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator.The"Not to Exceed"amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). SECTION 7 TERMINATION 7.1 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE If the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner, or otherwise violates, any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations material to this Agreement, the City, through its City Manager, shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement for cause. Prior to exercising its option to terminate for cause, the City shall notify the Consultant of its violation of the particular term(s)of this Agreement and shall gr ant Consultant ten (10) days to cure such default. If such default remains uncured after ten(10)days, the City may terminate this Agreement without further notice to Consultant. Upon termination, the City shall be fully discharged from any and all liabilities, duties, and terms arising out of, or by virtue of, this Agreement. 4 Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by any breach of the Agreement by the Consultant. The City, at its sole option and discretion, shall be entitled to bring any and all legal/equitable actions that it deems to be in its best interest in order to enforce the City's rights and remedies against Consultant. The City shall be entitled to recover all costs of such actions, including reasonable attorneys'fees. 7.2 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY THE CITY MAY ALSO, THROUGH ITS CITY MANAGER, AND FOR ITS CONVENIENCE AND WITHOUT CAUSE, TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT AT ANY TIME DURING THE TERM BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE TO CONSULTANT OF SUCH TERMINATION; WHICH SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING RECEIPT BY THE CONSULTANT OF SUCH NOTICE. ADDITIONALLY, IN THE EVENT OF `A PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR SAFETY CONCERN, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY MANAGER, IN THE CITY MANAGER'S SOLE DISCRETION,` THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO A VERBAL OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CONSULTANT, MAY IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE SERVICES UNDER THIS AOREEMENT FOR A TIME CERTAIN, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT ON A GIVEN DATE. IF THE AGREEMENT IS TERMINATED FOUR CONVENIENCE BY THE CITY, CONSULTANT SHALL BE PAID FOR ANY SERVICES SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION; FOLLOWING WHICH THE CITY SHALL BE DISCHARGED FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES, DUTIES,AND TERMS ARISING OUT OF, OR BY VIRTUE OF, THIS AGREEAENT. 7.3 TERMINATION FOR INSOLVENCY The City also reserves the right to terminate the Agreement in the event the Consultant is placed either in voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. In such event, the right and obligations for the parties shall be the same as provided for in Section 5-2. SECTION 8 INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 8.1 INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Miami Beach and its officers, employees, agents, and contractors, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, and expenses,including,but not,limited to,reasonable attorneys'fees and costs,for personal or bodily injury, wrongful death, loss of or damage to property, to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors, omissions or other wrongful conduct of the Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, sub-consultants, or any other person or entity acting under Consultant's control or supervision, in the Consultant's performance of the Services pursuant to this Agreement. To that extent, the Consultant shall pay all such claims and losses and shall pay all such costs and judgments which may issue from any lawsuit arising from such claims and losses, and to that extent shall pay all reasonable costs and attorneys' fees expended by the City in the defense of such claims and losses, including appeals. The Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance 5 c .J•� protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the Consultant shall in no way limit the Consultant's responsibility to indemnify the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. The parties agree that one percent(1%)of the total compensation to Consultant for performance of the Services under this Agreement is the specific consideration from the City to the Consultant for the Consultant's indemnity agreement. The provisions of this Section 6.1 and of this indemnification shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. 8.2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The Consultant shall maintain and carry in full force during the Term,the following insurance: 1. Consultant General Liability, in the amount of $1,000,000000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 General Aggregate and $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate ; 2. Consultant Professional Liability, in the amount of$200,000 per claim and aggregate; and 3. Workers Compensation , as required pursuant to Florida Statutes and Employer's Liability with limits of $1,000,000 per accident, $1,000,000 policy limit — disease and $1,000,000 each employee-disease. The insurance must be furnished by insurance companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida, All insurance policies must be issued by companies rated no less than "B+" as to management and not less than "Class VI" as to strength by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by AM. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey, or its equivalent. All of Consultant's certificates shall contain endorsements providing that written notice shall be given to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to termination or cancellation in the policy. The insurance certificates for General Liability shall include the City as an additional insured and shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement. Original certificates of insuance must be submitted to the City's Risk Manager for approval (prior to any work and/or services commencing)and will be kept on file in the Office of the Risk Manager. Except for the professional liability policy, the City shall have the right to obtain from the Consultant specimen copies of the insurance policies in the event that submitted certificates of insurance are inadequate to ascertain compliance with required coverage. However, a copy of the professional liability policy will be made available for review by the City's Risk Manager if requested. The Consultant is also solely responsible for obtaining and submitting all insurance certificates for any sub-consultants. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the Consultant of the liabilities and obligations under this Section or under any other portion of this Agreement. The Consultant shall not commence any work and or services pursuant to this Agreement until all insurance required under this Section has been obtained and such insurance has been reasonably approved by the City's Risk Manager. 6 SECTION 9 LITIGATION JURISDICTION/VENUE/JURY TRIAL WAIVER This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. This Agreement shall be enfo rIceable in Miami-Dade County, Florida, and if legal action is necessary by either party with respect to the enforcement of any or all of the terms or conditions herein, exclusive venue for the enforcement of same shall lie in Miami-Dade County, Florida. By entering into this Agreement, Consultant and the City expressly waive any rights either party may have to a trial by jury of any civil litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement. SECTION 10 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The parties desire to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the parties can place a limit on the parties' liability for any cause of action, for money damages due to an alleged breach by a party of this Agreement,so that a party's liability for any such breach never exceeds the following: (i)for the City, the sum of$10,000(excluding breach of contract claims for work performed under this Agreement), and (ii)for the Consultant, the greater of the amount of Consultant's fee or $1,000,000. Consultant and City hereby expresses their willingness to enter into this Agreement with the parties recovery from each other for any damage action for breach of contract to be so limited. Nothing contained in this section or elsewhere in this Agreement is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon the City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. SECTION 11 DUTY OF CARE/COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS/PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; AND e FINDINGS 11.1 DUTY OF CARE Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the parties agree that with respect to the performance of the work and/or service contemplated herein, Consultant shall exercise that degree of skill, care, efficiency and diligence normally exercised by reasonable persons and/or recognized professionals with respect to the performance of comparable work and/or services. 11.2 COMPLIANCE WIT-1 APPLICABLE LAWS In its performance of the work and/or services, Consultant shall comply in all material respects with applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations of the City, Miami-Dade County, the State of Florida, and the federal government, as applicable. 11.3 PATENT RIGHTS; COPYRIGHT; CONFIDENTIAL FINDINGS Subject to and conditioned upon the Consultant's receipt of all payments properly due under this 7 Agreement, any work product arising out of this Agreement, as well as all information specifications, processes/, data and findings, are intended to be the property of the City and shall not otherwise be made public and/or disseminated by Consultant,without the prior written consent of the City Manager, excepting any information, records etc. which are required to be disclosed pursuant to Court Order and/or Florida Public Records Law. Subject to the foregoing requirement for receipt of payment, all reports, documents, articles, devices, and/or work produced in whole or in part under this Agreement are intended to be the sole and exclusive property of the City, and shall not be subject to any application for copyright or patent by or on behalf of the Consultant or its employees or sub-consultants, without the prior written consent of the City Manager. SECTION 12 GENERAL PROVISIONS 12.1 AUDIT AND INSPECTIONS Upon reasonable verbal o I written notice to Consultant, and at any time during normal business hours (i.e. 9AM—5PM, Monday through Fridays,excluding nationally recognized holidays), and as often as the City Manager may, in his/her reasonable discretion and judgment, deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City Manager, and/or such representatives as the City Manager may deem to act on the City's behalf, to audit, examine, and/or inspect, any and all other documents and/or records relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain any and all such records at its place of business at the address set forth in the "Notices"section of this Agreement. 12.2 INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT RIGHTS (A) Pursuant to Section 2-256 of the Code of the City of Miami Beach,the City has established the Office of the Inspector General which may,on a random basis,perform reviews,audits, inspections and investigations on all City contracts, throughout the duration of said contracts. This random audit is separate and distinct from any other audit performed by or on behalf of the City. (B) The Office of the Inspector General is authorized to investigate City affairs and empowered to review past, present and proposed City programs, accounts, records, contracts and transactions. In addition, the Inspector General has the power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, require the production of witnesses and monitor City projects and programs. Monitoring of an existing City project or program may include a report concerning whether the project is on time, within budget and in conformance with the contract documents and applicable law. The Inspector General shall have the power to audit, investigate,monitor,oversee, inspect and review operations,activities, performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design, bid specifications, (bid/proposal) submittals, activities of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees, lobbyists, City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption. Pursuant to Section 2-378 of the City Code, the City 8 is allocating a percentage of its overall annual contract expenditures to fund the activities and operations of the Office of Inspector General. (C) Upon ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant, the Consultant shall make ail requested records and documents available to the Inspector General for inspection and copying. The Inspector General is empowered to retain the services of independent private sector auditors to audit, investigate, monitor, oversee, inspect and review operations activities, performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design, bid specifications, (bid/proposal)submittals, activities of the Consultant its officers, agents and employees, lobbyists, City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption. (D) The Inspector General shall have the right to inspect and copy all documents and records in the Consultant's possession, custody or control which in the Inspector General's sole judgment, pertain to performance of the contract, including, but not limited to original estimate files, change order estimate files, worksheets, proposals and agreements from and with successful subcontractors and suppliers, all project-related correspondence, • memoranda, instructions, financial documents, construction documents, (bid/proposal) and contract documents, back-change documents, all documents and records which involve cash, trade or volume discounts, insurance proceeds, rebates, or dividends received, payroll and personnel records and supporting documentation for the aforesaid documents and records. • (E)The Consultant shall make available at its office at all reasonable times the records, materials, and other evidence regarding the acquisition (bid preparation) and performance of this Agreement, for examination, audit, or reproduction, until three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement or for any longer period required by statute or by other clauses of this Agreement. In addition: i. If this Agreement is completely or partially terminated,the Consultant shall make available records relating to the work terminated until three(3)years after any resulting final termination settlement; and ii. The Consultant shell make available records relating to appeals or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this Agreement until such appeals, litigation, or claims are finally resolved. (F) The provisions in this section shall apply to the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and suppliers. The Consultant shall incorporate the provisions in this section in all subcontracts and all other agreements executed by the Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. (G)Nothing in this section shall impair any independent right to the City to conduct audits or investigative activities. The provisions of this section are neither intended nor shall they be construed to impose any liability on the City by the Consultant or third parties. 9 12.3 ASSIGNMENT,TRANSFER OR SUBCONSULTING The parties shall not subcontract, assign,or transfer all or any portion of any work and/or service under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party, which consent, if given at all, shall be in such party's sole but reasonable judgment and discretion. Neither this Agreement, nor any term or provision hereof, or right hereunder, shall be assignable unless as approved pursuant to this Section,and any attempt to make such assignment(unless approved) shall be void. 12.4 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES - Prior to commencement of the Services, the Consultant shall file a State of Florida Form PUR 7068, Sworn Statement under Section 287.133(3)(a) Florida Statute on Public Entity Crimes with the City's Procurement Division. 12.5 NO DISCRIMINATION In connection with the performance of the Services, the Consultant shall not exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination anyone on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, income or family status. Additionally, Consultant shall comply fully with the City of Miami/Beach Human Rights Ordinance, codified in Chapter 62 of the City Code, as may be amended from time to time, prohibiting discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations, and public services on account of actual or perceived race, color, national origin,religion,sex, intersexuality,gender identity, sexual orientation, marital and familial status, age, disability, ancestry, height, weight, domestic partner status, labor organization membership,familial situation, or political affiliation. 12.6 CONFLICT OF INIIEREST Consultant herein agrees to adhere to and be governed by all applicable Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest Ordinances and Ethics provisions, as set forth in the Miami-Dade County Code, as may be amended from time to time;and by,the City of Miami Beach Charter and Code, as may be amended from time to time; both of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, directly or indirectly,which could conflict-in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not employ any person having any such interest. No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this Agreement or to any benefits arising therefrom. 12.7 CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW (A) Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, as may be lamended from time to time. • 10 (B) The term "public records" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011(12), which means all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. (C) Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes, if the Consultant meets the definition of"Contractor" as defined in Section 119.0701(1)(a), the Consultant shall: (1) Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (2) Upon request from the City's custodian of public records, provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed, except as authorized by law, for the durJation of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (4) Upon completion of the Agreement, transfer, at no cost to the City, all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service. If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. Ali records stored electronically must be provided to the City, upon request from the City's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. (0) REQUEST FOR RECORDS; NONCOMPLIANCE. (1) A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City. If the City does not possess the requested records, the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request, and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time. (2) Consultant's failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement, and the City, at its sole discretion, may: (1) unilaterally terminate the Agreement; (2) avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement; and/or(3)avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. (3) A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s. 119.10. (E) CIVIL ACTION. (1) If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records relating to the City's contract for services, the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorneys' fees, if: a. The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time; and b. At least 8 business days before filing the action, the plaintiff provided written 11 notice of the public records request,including a statement that the Consultant, has riot complied with the request,to the City and to the Consultant. (2) A notice complies with subparagraph (1)(b) if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent. Such notices must be sent by common carrier delivery service or by registered, Global Express Guaranteed,or certified mail,with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery, which may be in an electronic format. (3) A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. (F) IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING Tb THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION: RAFAEL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 E-MAIL: RAFAELGRANADOAMIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE: 305-1673-7411 SECTION 13 NOTICES All notices and communications in writing required or permitted hereunder, shall be delivered personally to the representatives of the Consultant and the City listed below or may be mailed by U.S. Certified Mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service. Until changed by notice, in writing, all such notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: TO CONSULTANT: Jose Gelabert-Navia Perkins and Will Architects 2800 Ponce De Leon Blvd,#1300 Coral Gables FL 33134 TO CITY: City of Miami Beach Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 Carmen Sanchez, Deputy Planning Director 12 Notice may also be provided to any other address designated by the party to receive notice if such alternate address is provided via U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, hand delivered, or by overnight delivery. In the event an alternate notice address is properly provided, notice shall be sent to such alternate address in addition to any other address which notice would otherwise be sent, unless other delivery instruction as specifically provided for by the party entitled to notice. Notice shall be deemed given on the date of an acknowledged receipt, or, in all other cases, on the date of receipt or refusal. SECTION 14 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 14.1 CHANGES AND ADDITIONS This Agreement cannot be modified or amended without the express written consent of the parties. No modification, amendment, or alteration of the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless c' ntained in a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 14.2 SEVERABILITY If any term or provision ofithis Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to tfr fullest extent permitted by law. 14.3 WAIVER OF BREACH A party's failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such provision or modification of this Agreement. A party's waiver of any breach of a provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement. 14.4 JOINT PREPARATION The parties hereto acknowledge that they have sought and received whatever competent advice and counsel as was necessary for them to form a full and complete understanding of all rights and obligations herein and that the preparation of this Agreement has been a joint effort of the parties,the language has been agreed to by parties to express their mutual intent and the resulting document shall not,solely as a matter of judicial construction,be construed more severely against one of the parties than the ether. 14.5 ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT The City and Consultant agree that this is the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document l Title and paragraph headings are for convenient reference and are not intended to confer any rights or obligations upon the parties to this Agreement. 13 14.6 NO PERSONAL LIABILITY PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 558.0035(1)(C), AN INDIVIDUAL, EMPLOYEE, OR AGENT MAY NOT BE HELD INDIVIDUALLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE OCCURRING WITHIN THE COURSE AND SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT. 14.7 WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES The Consultant and City waive consequential damages for claims, disputes, or other matters in question, arising out of or relating to this Agreement. This mutual waiver includes, but is not limited to, damages incur fed by the City or Consultant for rental expenses, for loss of use, income, profit,financing, business and reputation, and for loss of management or employee productivity or the services of such persons. 14.8 RIGHT OF RELIANE ON INFORMATION Following its good faith evaluation of the information provided, the Consultant is entitled to reasonably rely upon the accuracy and completeness of the information given by the City or others acting on the City'slbehalf. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] • 14 r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first entered above. FOR CITY: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA ATTEST: ale MAYOR Date: OZ FOR CONSULTANT: PERKINS &WILL ARCHITECTS, INC. ATTEST: B (1(m rtkiii LC • {+cretary Signature President f Cry rr►�,er "e t!ale ® r c.eA EZT f 194V;Vai° t.4 Print Name and Title Print Name and Title F Date: A-LA Q cot,5A- 2 I ) 2 029 • APPROVED AS TO FORM&LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION City Attorney p e Date 15 EXHIBIT A • SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 SCOPE: Statement of Understanding: (From our RFQ: The City's current land development regulations are prescriptive in nature and generally difficult to read and clearly understand. The regulations contain complex and often overlapping criteria for permitted and conditional uses,development regulations and overlay districts. The regulations generally do not sufficiently address how a building is oriented on a site,impacts surrounding sites.or affects the pedestrian environment and public realm. Over the last few decades, this has created the need for lengthy and complicated negotiations between City staff and developers in order to achieve sound planning and development practices. The regulations, which were adopted in 1989, have not be reviewed and updated, but they have been amended in a frequent and piecemeal manner over the last 30 years. The Administration believes that the City and its residents would benefit from a simplification of the manner in which these regulations are presented,and that a form-based style • approach is best suited for this task. By means of this RFQ, the City seeks to contract with a consultant who would be tasked with performing the analysis and drafting of the code, as well as facilitating apprc,priate community outreach. The Administration would assist as needed in order to reduce costs and would provide the institutional knowledge needed to properly convert the existing,prescriptive based land development regulations,into a form- based style document. Objectives of the Study:(From CMB RFQ 2019-209-ND): To create a new form-based resiliency code: - Tailored specifically to Miami Beach, to simplify permitted and conditional use requirements, focusinglon building orientation,scale, context,and building frontages. - That regulates the final form of development practices that are currently being negotiated with developers within the context of the code. - That provides City staff,developers and the community with clear and consistent rules and regulations to whiclh new development must conform. - That simplifies the manlier in which permitted and conditional uses are set forth,so that property owners, residelnts,prospective buyers or developers can quickly decipher what types of uses are permitted on a site. - That incorporates regulations and limitations that have been implemented over time in order to protect the quality of life of specific neighborhoods, - That works in conjunction with existing Historic Preservation regulations in order to ensure that new construction is compatible with historic districts and sites. - That enables the City to formulate a strategic plan that will continue to promote and protect the historic character of the distinct neighborhoods, while identifying areas for sustainable growth and development. 16 .1 •e, - That assists developers in having a clear understanding of the areas that are available for growth so that they can focus their resources on projects that con succeed. - That provides predictability that comes that will encourage residential and commercial investment that will benefit both the City and its residents. - That incorporates resiiiient and sustainable practices. - That provides incentives for Green Buildings that allow residents and businesses in new buildings to reduce tIfieir energy costs and carbon footprints. - That incorporates regulations that allow buildings to respond to the effects of climate change and sea level rise in a manner that does not detract from the pedestrian environment. - That prescribes raised frontage types that encourage interaction with the pedestrian environment where they are needed. 2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND KEY PERSONNEL We have structured our team into two separate but complementary groups: Design /Resiliency and Community Outreach/Implementation. A.Design/Resiliency: -The Urban Design Team will be led by Paul Ifulig, who has directed several major efforts in the City of Toronto for 15 years and has recently completed the Downtown Building for Liveability study-where the issues strongly parallel those of Miami Beach, Paul has also led Perkins and Will's work vtiiith 100 Resilient Cities,serving as the Strategy Partner for Toronto, Louisville and Minneapolis. -The Landscape Team wll!be led by Leo Alvarez,who has completed landscape guidelines and plans for four distinct neighborhoods in Miami Beach. Leo was also the key figure in the design of Atlanta's groundbreaking Beitiine Project. -The Resiliency Strategy will be developed by Doug Pierce,who wrote the RELi standards which in 2017 was adopted by the USGBC and the CBCI as their guidelines to offer greater adaptability and resilience to communities after weather and natural disasters. -Doug, Leo and Paul will be working together with Coastal Systems International,the acknowledged leader in engineering systems to address sea-level rise. B.Community Outreach/Implementation:Ana Gelabert-Sanchez AICP,the former Planning Director of the City of Miarli who was responsible for executing the visionary Miami 21, will work with the Managing Principal,Jose A.Gelabert-Navla AlA to lead our implementation team. 17 .a . Ana and Jose will be working not only with the Perkins and Will Design/Resiliency Team, but will also be involved in CommunityJOutreach,working with Michael Laos of the Sustainable Futures Group, and with Nancy Stroud of Lewis,Stroud and Deutsch,who is both a Planner and a Land Use Attorney. Nancy will provide the legal framework necessary for the formal enactment into law as she provided previously as the legal expert under Miami 21.Juan Mullerat of Plusurbla,a nationally recognized Form-Based Code expert will be working with both the Implementatioin and the Design Team to create a user-friendly document which will form the basis for the new Code that will guide all future planning and construction. 2.0 WORK PLAN STUDY DESIGN AND DELIVERABLES Our team has reviewed the comprehensive Scope of Work outlined in section 0100 2 of the RFQ 1019-209-ND and can confirm that we are ready to start at the Award of Contract(assumed in January 2020).The preliminary Study Design,outlined below, builds upon the Scope of Work by clarifying dates,inputs and roles.It is intended to be read in conjunction with the detailed Schedule and Work Plan included at the end of this section. Task 1.Fact Gathering Phase(5 months) The Fact Gathering Phase will aim to achieve four main objectives: a. Kick-off the project and establish project management and engagement protocols; b. Complete comprehensive analysis to inform the Study: c. Establish a clear vision for the resilient form-based code; d. Documenting all materials into a Background Conditions Report. Kick-off Meeting and Engagement Plan Working with the City's Project Lead,we will refine the attached Study Design at the Kick-off Meeting to clarify roles and responsibilities and confirm dates for key stakeholder meetings, milestones and deliverables.A preliminary agenda for the Kick-off Meeting will include: • Confirmation of•eam and project management roles; • Identify lines of communication; • Establish schedule for regular project management meetings; • Confirm decision-making and review process; • Confirmation of sIo ftware requirements for computational modelling;and © Identification of data requests(3D modelling,background documents, mapping,etc...). The Kick-off Meeting will be followed up by a Project Initiation Meeting that includes a broader range of city staff and members of the consultant team.This meeting will serve as an opportunity for city staff to: 18 5-.1/46. • Identify projeci priorities; • Define successful outcomes; • Review preliminary issues and opportunities; • Confirm key stakeholders;and • Define pathwato approval and implementation. Our Workplan also inclu I es time for dedicated project management that will take the form of monthly status updates where Perkins and Will will review status of deliverables and proposed updates to the schedule.These will be summarized as part of our monthly invoicing. After the Kick-off Meeting,our team will prepare a draft Engagement Plan that outlines how stakeholders will be engaged to deliver the Study.The Engagement Plan will include an outline of meetings,organized by type,and a clear delineation of responsibilities between the City and consultant team including venue booking, material production,project website, online surveys and/or mapping tools,and documentation.This draft will be reviewed with City staff and refined prior to commencement of engagement activities(outlined in Task 4.0). Background Analysis Led by Jose A. Gelabert-Navia,our team will review all relevant background materials provided by the City and prepare a comprehensive background analysis of the history, evolution, physical context,planning framework,heritage assets and existing code.This will include a review of the Comprehensive Plan, Public Works documents that specify planned street raising and drainage projects, Historic District Design Guidelines and the recent Buoyant City report.The analysis will focus on key drivers that inform the built form and document prevailing conditions and recent trends.We will rely on City staff to ensure that all relevant background data including topographic information,historical mapping and • property ownership maps are provided in a timely fashion. As part of the analysis,we intend to develop 3-D modelling using Rhino and customized Grasshopper plug-ins, developed specifically for these types of assignments.This approach allows for iterative modelling that responds to specific constraints and generates live statistical outputs. This will be paired with an analysis of projected sea-level rise and its potential impacts on Miami Beach.This will incljde: Part 1: Data Collection and Flood Predictions;and Part 2:Creation of GIS Database 19 The comprehensive analysis will be organized around issues and opportunities and grouped into a set of Character Areas(or Transects)that share common physical characteristics,prevailing conditions in built form and public realm,topographic conditions, flood risk and vision for he future Character Areas will be informed by the analysis above, but also shaped by forward-looking vision that is informed by the City of Miami Beach's work to date. The background analysis will be augmented by a series of high-level Case Studies(4- 5)that document how other communities have developed planning frameworks that respond to issues identified in the analysis of Miami Beach,above. Scenario Planning and Vision The Scenario Planning workshops will serve as an opportunity for senior leadership at the City to assess the issues and Opportunities faced by Miami Beach and identify a shared Vision for moving forward with the resilient form-based code.Our team will facilitate this process by outlining three potential scenarios that respond to the conditions identified in earlier stages of Task 1.0.We will host al,half-day workshop for senior leadership at the City that will serve to assess the potential.highL level responses and arrive at a shared strategic vision for Miami Beach's future. • This will begin with a Background Review Workshop attended by city staff and members of the city's senior leadership team and serves to: • Confirm prioriti Is and outcomes form the Project Initiation meeting: • Review preliminary Background Analysis and associated issues and • opportunities:and • Familiarize stakeholders with the scope,scale and timeframe of the challenges to be addressed. The Scenario Planning Workshop will distill the analysis, issues and opportunities outlined above,into three discrete scenarios that represent potential futures for Miami Beach. The intent of the Scenario Planning Workshop is not necessarily to solve the issues facing Miami Beach,but to'frame up'tI1e issues and provide a clear vision that will guide work in Tasks 2.0 and 4.0.We will work with participants to arrive at: • Interpretation of p4 ojections(by others)re sea-level rise to use as a'base'for the resilient form-basedrcode. �, • Projections for population growth to use as a'base'for the resilient form-based code. • Strategic approach to sea-level rise and storm water(internal raise,adaptive use, building in a building,individual approach or combined approach). • Strategic approacli (by neighborhood)re growth and change. Direction for the Scenario Planning Workshop will be compiled into a Vision Statement for Miami Beach and augmer'ted by a series of Character Area Vision Statements.These will be at a high level and describe how neighborhoods will change(or remain stable)and how they will adapt to sea-level rise through an integrated topographical and landscape approach. They will remain qualitative with the expectation that the quantitative details are added 20 ,5 during Task 2.0.The Vision Statements will serve to guide the detailed work in Task 2.0 and act as an evaluation tool for draft versions of the new Code. One final presentation at the conclusion of this Task will reflect the Vision Statements back to senior leadership for approval and sign-off, prior to commencing Task 2.0. Background Conditions Report Findings from Task 1,0 will be compiled into a Background Conditions Report suitable for sharing.on the City's public website. • . Subtasks: c Project Kick-off and Initiation meetings i EAM o Prepare detailed Engagement Plan(PK CR DP,AG) c Review of background documents,regulation and data o Review and evaluation of elements of resiliency o Issues and opportunities analysis o Review of case studies from other cities(codes + resilience):TEAM) c Scenario planning and Vision ODP, PK, JGN. 4MG. HS. 'is: • o Develop background conditions report 0 Engagement: iOP. PK .JGN.AMG. HS, JM. NS) c Project Team Meeting #1:Kick-off Meeting oo Project Management Meetings(monthly) a Project Team Mieeting#2:Project Initiation Meeting:review draft elements of o resiliency and preliminary analysis work. o Project Team Meeting#3:Background Review Workshop:review background o analysis report and scenario planning workshop o Project Team Meeting#4:Scenario Planning Workshop c Community Meeting#1: kick-off event to launch the project with outside experts,to o discuss about haw other cities have solved this problem and inspires public o Project Team Meeting#5: Presentation of Final Vision Statements o Project Management bi-weekly calls • Key Deliverables: o Project Charter c Updated workplan and project schedule o Engagement plan o Scenario Planning Workshop materials o Character Area Vision Statements o Draft and final Background Conditions Report o Meeting minutes! 21 o Assumptions: o The city's response to sea-level rise will be largely consistent with the preferred o scenarios outlined in the Buoyant City report,2019. o City of Miami Beach to provide: ■ 3D digital model of existing built form in Miami Beach • Topographic data for city • Exclusions: o Market analysis,real estate studies(absorption rates,or similar) o Costing of mitigation improvements Subtasks completed by Lewis,Stroud&Deutsch, P.L.during Task 1: • Meet with consultant team for kick off, understanding of contract and responsibilities. Collect any prior work/papers done by city staff regarding expectations for changes to the code.For example,does the city want to update its sign code,or the historic preservation code,etc.? Has the city already developed proposals for changes to certain sections of the code? • Meet with city legal staff and city planning staff to identify staff ideas regarding suggested outline of code structure,and code sections that staff wants to update,and including those not necessarily related to resiliency but also in need of modification. For example,processes tl at need to be updated,or issues that need to be addressed because of legislative or judicial changes. I anticipate that Ana will need to attend and other consultant team members,if any,proposed by Jose. Subtasks completed by Coastal Systems International during Task 1: • Data collection and flood predictions: Data will be collected from available sources to support the mapping of sea level rise and associated flooding due to rainfall events,king tides,and tropical storms.The following specific information will be needed to support flood predictions under present conditions, as well as 20,40,and 60 years in the future. a. Topography&LiDAR Maps: LiDAR data available to the City of Miami Beach will be collected.Additionally,available information on street elevations and first floor building elevations will be compiled, as available from the City.Topographic survey data collected will be reduced to the horizontal coordinate system in general use and a vertical datum established for this Project based on,an NGVD datum,Contours will reflect elevations at 1-foot intervals.The base map can be represented upon a cm-level resolution,geo-referenced,and ortho-rectified color aerial imagery,if available from the City. 22 b. Existing Stormwater Management Systems:Flooding associated with rainfall events will be exasperated with increasing sea levels, Hence,an understanding of the current and future expected function and performance of the existing storm water management'systems is critical.Available City-wide storm water management studies previously produced by the City will be reviewed to assess vulnerability to storm events today and with future sea level rise.A qualitative assessment of ponding and nuisance flooding occurring currently and,in the future,will be conducted. c. Mapping of Flood Zones:Coastal Systems will compile sea level rise projection data for the region utilizing the updated projections from the South Florida Regional Climate Compact,including sea level rise predictions for 20,40,and 60 years forward.The storm surge and wave propagation modeling analyses for 25-,50-, and 100-year storms will be developed for each projected sea level elevation.Wave heights propagating into the Project area will also be summarized,and may be used by the Client ito quantify potential damage to selected features for each of the differing storm events.The MIKE 21 model developed by the Danish Hydraulic Institute will be utilized. Projected King Tide flooding elevation data will be • incorporated into the sea level rise projections,and will be assessed separately from the storm surge impact data.The results will be shown within a City-wide map, outlining the limits of water inundation associated with each return interval storm, under existing and projected sea level rise conditions.The vulnerability of the Project area will be calculated,based on these documented conditions and predicted flooding. d. Summary Report:Coastal Systems will summarize the results of the data collection and flood zone mapping predictions within a final report. Recommendations for reducing flood impacts and achieving improved resiliency will be provided for inclusion in the Resiliency Code.Coastal Systems will prioritize recommendations based on the vulnerability of buildings and selected strategies to mitigate potential flooding. • Creation of GIS database: In order to assess the benefits to the City associated with the proposed Resiliency Code and optimize the recommendations,it is necessary to economically model the influence of the proposed code changes.The economic model will require the use of a GIS database containing information on each property.Queries can then be applied within the GIS database to obtain an economic output for each code change scenario selected. The following data should be collected and organized in a GIS application for the Project: 23 a. Parcel Information from City:Coastal Systems will create a GIS database with the following data to be provided by the City. Specific information to be downloaded from the City's database will include: - Property parcel number - Property lbt area - Building area - Property taxable value - Property taxes - b. Building Floor Elevations:The collected topographic information will be incorporated into the GIS database.Additionally,a survey field team will survey each building within the Cityi to collect the following: - First Floor Elevation(FFE)of each building - Number of stories - Approximate elevation of second floor c. Flood Zones:Flood information collected in Part 1 will be entered into the database for each parcel.FEMA flood zones will also be entered into the database for comparison purposes. d. Zoning Code Data:Data regarding the existing community will be compiled and analyzed to understand the existing zoning and layout of the City of Miami Beach. Estimate of Flood insurance Costs:The cost of flood insurance premiums will be developed for each property. Predicted increases in flood insurance premiums will also be developed based on expected changes to the federal flood insurance industry,which is moving towards risk-based assessments for the calculation of premiums. Task 2:Draft of Code(6 months) Building on the analysis completed in Task 1,our team will prepare preliminary Character Area.Profiles that summarize a clear direction for each Character Area.These will be based on the Vision developed in Task 1.0 and will be informed by the background analysis, including open space network,building types,existing built form metrics(building separation, FAR, height.etc...), topography,sea-level rise projections,planning framework and development activity. Key to the Character Area Profiles will be establishing principal-based criteria for evaluation of Form-base Scenarios.Our team will establish a combination of qualitative and quantitative as well as performance-based metrics for review and approval by the city's Project Lead, These will bile reviewed with city staff as,part of a Character areas and evaluation criteria works op. A Preliminary 3D Massing of the built form and topography will be developed in an iterative fashion that involves workshop-style sessions with the Project Team,stakeholders and city staff.We will test various arrangements of form,proportion and spatial relationships using Perkins and Will's proprietary software that can generate sun-shadow assessments and statistical summaries in a 'live'environment to better communicate impacts, 24 . r benefits and trade-o ifs of various scenarios,as well as potential land assemblies and their impacts on the resulting forms. Resiliency and sea-rise analysis that identifies quantifiable net impacts will be prepared for each scenario.An assessment of each scenario,against the Character Area Profiles,will be developed for each scenario.Based on feedback received during these sessions we will refine the 3D Massing Model,in preparation for the Miami Beach public meetings.This juncture in the study will also serve as an opportune time to review progress with the City of Miami Beach Design and Planning Teams, Feedback from the vaious sessions will be reviewed with the Project Lead to identify any refinement andjor fur her assessment.Modifications made to the Massing Model will be developed to fully illustrate and communicate key issues and opportunities. Results will be organized in generalized height maps for each Character Area.Draft versions of the built form map will be reviewed with staff and stakeholders to review,comment on, and refine anchor pouts and inputs into the algorithm. , Results of the above-mentioned process will be compiled into the 1st Draft Code Amendments, with a goal of improving the clarity of the Code, following current lean code best practices. It will address salient toFics that are not adequately addressed in the Code today,including the following: e Transit-oriented development. • Sea Level Rise. ® Single-family residence regulations,including parking,garages,unit size,and lot , coverage • The design and location of driveways and parking areas,and the design of front yards for duplex and multi-family development. • Parking requirements and floor area ratio. • Mediterranean architecture standards for existing buildings. • Zoning standards and processes for constructing mixed-use buildings in commercial zoned areas • Open space requirements and design for commercial and mixed-use buildings. The final product of the Code revisions will be produced in strikethrough/underline format to facilitate easy integration into the existing Zoning Code,The Draft Code Amendments will be submitted to City Staff for internal review and comment. The 1st Draft Code Guidebook will be produced as an illustrated Code guidebook that will explain the principles underlying the Code revisions.The purpose of the Code guidebook is to be used as a companion manual to the Zoning Code for use by applicants and Staff in order to ensure the most accurate interpretations of Zoning Code provisions,in keeping with • the character of Miami Beach.The Draft Code Guidebook will be submitted to City Staff for internal review and comment. The 1s'Draft Code Guidebook will include: • Use Chart(tied to District Map, identifies Permitted,Conditional,and Prohibited e Uses) 25 440 • • Identified conditional use criteria • Street Topographical plan,current. • Street Topographical plan,proposed(with phasing timeline,if available) • Plan that Identifies elevation differential between current and proposed. • Frontage Dei ign(related to Strategies 1(Adapt in Place)and 2(Raise) • Map which shows streets that will remain at current grade. • Guidance on how to slope from proposed street topographies(regarding frontages, • front yards) The Code will be orgarized around a series of building types commonly found in Miami Beach including: • Single Family 3 • Cottage • House • Rowhouse • Multi family • Rambler • Interior Corridor • Walk-up . • Catwalk • Low-Rise Hotel • High-Rise HI tel • Dingbat • High-Rise Apartment Building Institutional and Commercial Mixed-Use Buildings • Civic • Commercial(Mixed.Use Currently,the code emphasizes achieving certification by rating systems such as LEED. In addition to the rating systems,the proposed code will expand and list the various low-tech and higher tech sustainability design strategies for projects that are not seeking certification by a rating system. Those strategies that promote reductions in energy consumption, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions,reduction in water consumption,and renewable energy will be emphasized. Incentives for employing those design strategies will be included in the regulations. • Building Adaptation Strategies Form-based Resilience Code may comment upon the following: a. Backf`ow prevention b. Mechanical systems flood protection c. Utility Protection d. Dry Floodproofing e. Wind mitigation 26 Pi's f. Waterproofing g. Flood resistant building materials h. ADA accessibility i. Wet FloIodproofing • Renewable Energy j. Photovoltaic panels k. Solar water heater I. Wind turbine • Green Infrastructure m. Rain gaidens n. Green roofs o. Blue roofs p. Sunken Plaza and Patios q. Permeable Pavement r. Cisterns s. Water recycling The code-writing team will also produce a comparative graphic showing pathways to approval for both the current code and the proposed form-based code. The code-writing team will propose means of streamlining approvals process, increasing the range of decisions that can be made administratively versus those subject to public hearings,or may propose consolidating or eliminating requirements to participate in hearings in front of certain boards/design review committee for certain types of applications. (Please refer to a Draft Table of Contents for the Form-based Code,appendix 4.) • Subtasks: a Develop Character Area Profiles o Prepare and evaluate preliminary 3D massing model o Define code typologies o Option development and iterative testing o Option evaluation o Prepare 1st draft of Code Amendments and Code Guidebook • Engagement: o Project Team Meeting#6:Character areas and evaluation criteria o Project Team Meeting#7: Option testing review o Community MelIeting#2:present vision, principles.objectives and sample code o Project Team Meeting#8:Option evaluation • • 27 • Key Deliverables: o Draft and final character area profiles o Draft and final design objectives evaluation matrixes o Draft and final code typologies o Preliminary 3D Massing and Evaluation o 1"draft of Code Amendments and Code Guidebook o Meeting minutes • Assumptions: o Sections on General Provisions,Administration and Review Procedures, Green Buildings, Sustainability Rating Systems and Street Sections from existing code will be streamlined to eliminate redundancy and made user-friendly o Sections on Concurrency Management and Signs will be largely adopted from existing code wiith minimal revisions o Section on Resilience will be eliminated,as it will permeate the full document Subtasks completed by Coastal Systems International during Task 2: • Risk assessment/avoided losses: Economic benefits will result from various scenarios proposed within the Resiliency Code. A comparison between the existing zoning conditions and the future conditions with proposed Resiliency Code changes will result in damage reductions or property benefits, due to the following: a. Avoided Losses:Coastal Systems will assess the direct damage caused by flooding and storm surge events on structures within the City. b. Preservation of Property Values: Repeated flooding or increased insurance costs will drive down property values and tax revenue to the City.The model will predict changes in real estate value,under existing zoning conditions and with proposed Resiliency Code changes. c. Insurance Premium Savings:Reduced flooding and damage impacts will result in lower insurance premiums. d. Preservation of City Tax Base:Coastal Systems will assess the tax revenue received by the City and the projected reduction in these revenues associated with repeated flooding and storm surge events. • Economic benefit of resiliency code adaptations: Beyond avoided loss Is as described in Part 3,there are additional benefits to the Resiliency Code modifications associated with changes in real estate values.Coastal Systems will assess and compare total real estate values and average values per square foot by land use areas.An estimation of the economic benefits of Code modifications. resulting in increased real estate value for the Owners,will be analyzed.Coastal Systems will prioritize the recorinmended Code modifications based on the economic modeling: Results will be summarized in a final report with value assumptions and damage curves. 28 Subtasks completed by Lewis, Stroud&Deutsch, P.C.during Task 2: • Prepare outline of cede structure and memo identifying changes requested by staff. To be distributed to city legal and planning team members and consultant team for • agreement on the d irection for drafting. • Consult with city legal staff(as identified by the city)and city planning staff(as identified by the city)regarding any changes to the comprehensive plan that may be required in order to implement the code changes. Prepare memo regarding the initial review and expectation for such changes and share with consultant team and city staff. • Begin draft of code pot dependent on new resiliency/form based standards. I anticipate that this will focus oln procedures and perhaps some issue areas required by legislation/judicial changes. This will be shared by city legal staff and planning staff for any modifications that they require or suggestions/questions they have.The software used to produce the code(if not Microsoft word)will be provided by the consultant team or the city to the legal consultant. Otherwise,drafts will be prepared in Microsoft word. • Substantive standards for resiliency changes and form-based changes will be developed by the consultant team,in consultation with the legal consultant as to any legal issues (for example,Bert Harris Act, legislative restrictions,etc.). Legal consultant will apprise the city legal staff of possible legal issues,preferably in a meeting with city legal and planning staff and consultant team members identified by Jose. • • Legal consultant will incorporate the standards developed by the consultant team into the draft code. This likely will happen in progressive steps,with individual chapters drafted, reviewed by team,modified and redrafted. We should try to manage this process among the consultant team to reduce the number of drafts required. Several meetings with the consultant team will be required to understand the standards and how they are to be impiemIIanted. Graphics to be prepared by the consultant team or city staff and incorporated into the draft as necessary by the consultant team. Task 3: Meetings This section includes a summary of all the meetings included during the full process. a 3 Community Meetings 'DP PK.AMG HS. NS) (Miami Design P ieservation League and Community Groups are invited to the Community Meeting) 29 P- ,2=1. f+G • 8 Public Meetings o City Commission refers an ordinance for new land development regulations(LDRs) o to the Planning Board and Land Use and Development Committee(LUDC)of the o City Commission- Introduction of team to the City Commission. o LUDC public hearing on proposed LDRs. Makes recommendation to Planning Board o and City Commission. c Planning Boa r1d public hearing for review and recommendation on proposed LDRs o to City Commission. c City Commission First Reading. o City Commission Adoption Hearing o Historic PreserIvation Board(HPB) o Design Reviev+t Board(DRB) o Sustainability and Resiliency Committee(SRC)of the City Commission • 6 Focus Group Meetings with City Staff and key stakeholders; to be scheduled as needed. It may include: o Landowner and Developer Group o Historic Preservation Board(HPB) o Design Review Board(DRB) o Sustainability and Resiliency Committee(SRC)of the City Commission o Miami Design)Preservation League (MDPL). o Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce o South of Fifth Neighborhood Association (SOFNA) o West Avenue Neighborhood Association(WAVNA) o Miami Beach Neighborhoods United(MBNBU) o Miami Beach Convention and Visitors Bureau o Homeowner Associations o Other neighborhoods associations,as requested, • 12 Project Team Meetings and workshops Subtasks completed by Lewis.Stroud&Deutsch. P.L.during Task 3: • Legal consultant will attend 5 public hearings, 1 community meeting.]focus group meeting Task 4: Refine Code (4 months) Refinement of the draft Cade will begin upon receipt of a comprehensive set of comments related to the Draft Code.Our Study Design has allowed for two rounds of refinement of the draft that will be structured around the following series of stakeholder engagement activities(refer to Task 3.0): 30 • Public Presentation&Meetings. • Land Use Committee Presentation. • Planning Board Committee Presentation and Approval • City Commission Meeting and Approval • Subtasks: o Prepare 2nd draft of Code Amendments and Code Guidebook o Prepare 3rd draft of Code Amendments and Code Guidebook o Prepare for public meetings • Engagement: o Project Team Meeting#9:Review of Code Amendments and Guidebook o Project Team Meeting#10:Review of Code Amendments and Guidebook o Key Deliverables: <= 2 drafts Codel Amendments and Code Guidebook Meeting minutes Subtasks completed by Lewis, Stroud&Deutsch, P.L.during Task 4: • A final complete draft will be prepared for city staff review. Revisions as required by city legal staff will be mode. Task 5:Adjustments&Completion(3 months) l'Y Pt; .k,f;: N:.4MGNS1 Final code to be submitted in hard copy;graphics format will be provided by the City once determined. • Subtasks: o Develop implementation strategy Finalize revisions o Project close-odit and file transfer • Engagement: c Project Team Meeting#11:Plan adjustments&completions o Project Team Meeting#12:Project closeout o Community Meeting#3:Open house • Key Deliverables: • a Final document(refer to legal consulting services listed as a separate item) cr Native files a Meeting minutes 31 Subtasks completed Jy Lewis, Stroud& Deutsch, Pt during Task 5: e Assist in finalizing the draft code • 32 • EXHIBIT B FEE SCHEDULE PHASE 1 : Task 1. Fact Gathering Phase $ 263,310.00 Task 2. Draft of Code - 75%completed $ 406,690.00 Reimbursable Expenses: (Travel for TOR and MN Teams) $ 30,000.00 Subtotal Phase 1 $ 700,000.00 PHASE 2 : Task 2. Draft of Code-25% completed $ 113,040.00 Task 3. Meetings $ 112,470.00 Task 4. Refine Code $ 175,980.00 Task 5. Adjustments&Completion $ 61,870.00 Reimbursable Expenses: (Travel for TOR and MN Teams) $ 12,800.00 Subtotal Phase 2 $ 476.160.00 TOTAL LABOUR: $ 1,133,360.00 Reimbursable Expenses: (Travel far TOR and MN Teams) $ 42,800.00 33 5- •.11. 2.4 EXHIBIT B (CONTINUED) HOURLY RATES FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Classification Billable Rate Principal $350.00 Associate Principal $300.00 SeniorProjectManager $225.00 Project Manager l $200.00 Senior Project Designer $225.00 Project Designer $165.00 Senior ProjectArchitect/!D/LA $210.00 ProjectArchitect/1D $165.00 Senior Technical Coordinator $190.00 Technical Coordi ator $165.00 Arch/ID I/LAI $100.00 Arch/IDII/LA II $120.00 Arch/ID CII/LAlll $130.00 Intern $100.00 Administrative/Clerical $ 90.00 34 EXHIBIT C PROJECT SCHEDULE lela 70,0 pan N D J p H A M J J A 5 ONOJ ! N a M l J To.k 1:Fact Gathering ':,�.xx ;�,�. 7r:z.;�';r�✓ rto:.aa.a.-Nf;aavbin aaai.aejMYru Wrecke 0 wp>•a.:a a.d.,Das.,w pa. lao,pa Aa.�.afe.na.,wdeo.w,w,lr.•ayd..arra mm 0 0 mae,mar•o a-aa Review me inalaaan N*Jam.ra.Nrcdl..ay 0 oppoawAros aware 0 Can,. ty ons4,,g A..Nw of cans er6.r Iran pNw vvat I 0 Pv.mr y want&mp„„a 0 s,a..rr:w.,nine o.,.rapea.:p,aa.a aa.aaa,a..pon O ° Task 2:Draft Code O«rtop d.prpnia area araN.. Rearm cad rarahralc p.caNnary 50..a'rap.veal aNnc<oEa eypabq'+r • op+laaa..aq.one Ire.nlN.m.13.9 �y Ckararr4aoarateaa 0 a,Car.A..aralawb a,a C Repo,*n:alma aa.c„Ae.D.0 Task 3:McNln3s � arra€-,-.�nv,zss-,ax,.,..x:.- *••ee,.aas:�rna�sr_:®xr�ar.v.xa�«a.+r...�,a�..�..^�, .;.rr€�BF s.'px;:-.. r. ss�s aro ..r,"+l°.,;;.-� epnwnap AteNMr �: C n !0 wavawdapa 0 4a s 0 ole O:Nc v� �'c I 4Oc fora.fn Cvaaar aalaca Task 4:Refine Coda .. ey, rnpap Cd&oft N Co.Amanda..red Coda Gra teen 0 hl Pw,a,Sri daltaltada.mrraam wa pea Ca6a G..Gaboai M1ape..I paDaam...9, Togs 5:Adjustments&Completion i oar.,im{W m.atal.appepy rrro wrawoet • O Foyrtedmc wt arae Ib venire • 35 aS ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION&COMMISSION AWARD MEMO RESOLUTION NO. 2019-31031 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2019-209-ND, FOR RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH PERKINS & WILL ARCHITECTS INC., AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH PERKINS &WILL ARCHITECTS INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DPZ CODESIGN, LLC, AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS, on June 5, 2019, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2019-209-ND for Resiliency Code Consultant Services; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2019, the RFQ 2019-242-ND for Resiliency Code Consultant Services (the"RFQ")was issued; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on June 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on July 23, 2019, the City received a total of 4 proposals from AECOM Technical Services, Inc., DPZ CoDesign, LLC, Morrison Hershfield Corporation, Perkins & Will Architects, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Proposal from Morrison Hershfield Corporation was deemed non- responsive for failure to meet the minimum requirements of the RFQ, and the proposal was therefore not evaluated any further; and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on September 17, 2019 to review and score the remaining proposals; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided,an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the 4mmittee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as follows: Perkins & Will Architects, `nc ., as the top ranked proposer; AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; and DPZ CoDesign, LLC, as the third ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, after reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings and commentary, the City Manager concurs with the Evaluation Committee and recommends that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Perkins & Will Architects, Inc., the top ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Perkins &Will Architects, Inc., authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with DPZ CoDesign, LLC, as the third ranked proposer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request For Qualifications No. 2019-209-ND for Resiliency Code Consultant Services, and authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Perkins & Will Architects, Inc., as the top ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Perkins & Will Architects, Inc. Company, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with DPZ CoDesign, LLC, as the third ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of Oft iY2019. ATTEST: RAFAtL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK DAN GELBER, MAYOR T:1Agenda12019\10 October 16\Procurement'RFQ 2019-209-ND Resiliency Consultant Services\RFQ-2019-209-ND-Resotution.doc .,...... �. `'er a APPROVED AS TO \:'^‘ ''J �Y FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION r'‘-'1,'"V,4 1, c:_ City Attorney " • p Date Coversheet Page 1 of 3 Resolutions-C7 V MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales,City Manager DATE: October 16,2019 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2019-209-ND, FOR RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH PERKINS &WILL ARCHITECTS INC., AS THE TOP RANKED PROPOSER; (FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH PERKINS&WILL ARCHITECTS INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.,AS THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER;FURTHER, IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH DPZ CODESIGN, LLC,AS THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution accepting the City Manager's recommendation. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City's current land development regulations are prescriptive in nature and generally difficult to read and clearly understand. The regulations contain complex and often overlapping criteria for permitted and conditional uses, development regulations and overlay districts. The regulations generally do not sufficiently address how a building is oriented on a site, impacts surrounding sites, or affects the pedestrian environment and public realm.Over the last few decades,this has created the need for lengthy and complicated negotiations between City staff and developers in order to achieve sound planning and development practices. The regulations, which were adopted in 1989, have not been reviewed and updated, but they have been amended in a frequent and piecemeal manner over the last 30 years. A modern resiliency code,tailored spl cifically to Miami Beach,would simplify permitted and conditional use requirements,focusing on building orientation, scale, context, and building frontages. This would provide City staff, developers and the community with clear and consistent rules and regulations to which new development must conform. Additionally,the manner in which permitted and conditional uses are set forth would be simplified,thus allowing a property owner, resident, prospective buyer or developer to quickly decipher what types of uses are permitted on a site.A simplified use table will not affect any of the regulations and limitations that have been implemented over time in order to protect the quality of life of specific neighborhoods.All existing regulations, requirements and special restrictions on certain.uses would be transferred to the body of the new code.The proposed code would also work in conjunction with existing historic preservation regulations in order to ensure that new construction is compatible with historic districts and sites. The adoption of a resiliency code will enable the City to formulate a strategic plan that will continue to promote and protect the historic character of the distinct neighborhoods, while identifying areas for sustainable growth and addressing our shocks and stresses. Developers will have a clear understanding of the areas that are available for growth and will be able to focus their resources on projects that can succeed. The predictability that comes from thisknowledge will encourage residential and commercial investment that will benefit both the City and its residents. By means of this RFQ,the City seeks to contract with a consultant who would be tasked with performing the analysis and drafting of the code, as well as facilitating appropriate community outreach.The Administration would assist as needed in order to reduce costs and would provide the institutional knowledge needed to properly convert the existing, prescriptive based land development regulations, into the new code document. ANALYSIS On June 5, 2019, the Mayor and City Commission authorized the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2019-209-ND for Resiliency Code Consultant Services'. Responses were due and received on July 23, 2019.The City received a total of four (4) proposals from the following firms: PECOM Technical Services, Inc., DPZ CoDesign, LLC, Morrison Hershfield Corporation, Perkins &Will Architects, Inc.The proposal from Morrison Hershfield Corporation was deemed non-responsive for failure to meet the minimum requirement of the RFQ land was not further evaluated. The Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager convened on September 17,2019,to consider proposals received.The Committee was comprised of Michael Belush, Chief of Planning and Zoning, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach; Hernan //r ;nrr. kimant.. Yl/1\/Ilea rrc.rl rla rsr\lYI Ia mart/4.01,m 1111/ 11l)Pl`C 1l oaf aervv7 TtamTTr-1 AR 1 fiRr T/T 111/1, /' n1a Coversheet Page 2 of 3 Cardeno, Director, Code Compliance Department, City of Miami Beach; Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability, Planning Department,City of Miami Beach;Lynda Westin,Transportation Manager,Transportation Department,City of Miami Beach;and Elizabeth Wheaton,Director,Environment and Sustainability Department, City of Miami Beach The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ.The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of proposers as indicated in Attachment A,in the following order: 1.Perkins&Will Architects,Inc. 2.AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 3.DPZ CoDesign,LLC A summary of each top-ranked firm follows: Perkins&Will Architects,Inc. Founded over 80 years ago, Perkins&Will Architects, Inc. (Perkins&Will) is a global team of 2,700 creative and critical thinkers that provide worldwide interdisciplinary services in architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, and more. It is passionate about human-centered design and committed to creating a positive impact in people's lives through sustainability, resilience,well- being, diversity, inclusion and research. It has pushed the boundaries of resilience design across the globe and locally by developing, in conjunction with the Institute for Market Transformation to Sustainability, RELi, a public standard that prescribes methods for designing more resilient buildings, neighborhoods, homes, infrastructure, and communities. The firm has also partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation, 100 Resilient Cities and the Toronto Resilience Strategy on a number of projects. AECOM Technical Services,Inc. Founded in 1990, AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) is a full-service firm operating in over 150 countries.The team has extensive experience implementing citywide codes,land use regulations,and design guidelines nationally.The firm also has a long history of delivering innovative planning documents,such as comprehensive and community plans,zoning plans and amendments, district masterplans,downtown and transit-oriented development strategies,environmental documents,and sustainability plans. DPZ CoDesign,LLC DPZ CoDesign,LLC(DPZ)was founded in 1980 and is based in Miami,Florida,with satellite offices in Gaithersburg,Maryland and Portland,Oregon. DPZ is a leader in!planning, urban design, coding,and architecture,with over 300 projects for new and existing communities in the U.S. and internationally, DPZ's contributions to planning,design,and regulations have been widely recognized for their excellence and influence on the making of walkable urbanism,complete neighborhoods,and resilient communities. CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION After reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee process, I concur with the Evaluation Committee and find Perkins & Will Architects, Inc. to be the best qualified firm for the project. Perkins & Will is familiar with the topography and neighborhoods of the City of Miami Beach,as they have been actively involved in designing new structures in the City over the last 25 years. Moreover, because of their subconsultant, Coastal Engineering,they will have access to data regarding the elevation of existing buildings and setbacks of the foundation of existing buildings that will be fundamental in addressing the historic district. Finally, Perkins & Will recommends a performance-based approach to the development of the resiliency code that allows for flexibility over time, while setting targets for high quality design, urban place-making, community connectivity, and economic feasibility. For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Perkins & Will Architects, Inc., as the top ranked proposer; further, if the administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Perkins &Will Architects, Inc., authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with AECOM!Technical Services, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; further, if the administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with DPZ CoDesign,LLC,as the third ranked proposer;and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The costs of the related services are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process.Grant funding will not be utilized for this project. CONCLUSION The administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the City Manager's recommendation with regard to the proposals received in response to RFQ 2019-209-ND for resiliency code consultant services. Applicable Area Citywide Is this a Resident Right to Does this item utilize G.O. Know item? Bond Funds? Yes No Strategic Connection Neighborhoods-Modernize and streamline our old and complex land development regulations and City codes. m-1 AQ1 112,r,r 1 All K/1111 A Coversheet Page 3 of 3 Legislative Tracking Planning/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Attachment A ❑ Resolution 1,14.--.• ;.-Arrt;htanni, .,,,.r„nem ro,, 1,1 i.,,.o„a.,.,l,t.t:, /0.-s, Qh..1-nTl-7 A Q1/l.P.na 1A/14/W11 o RFQ 2019.209•ND- '> Michael Belush x-. Hernan Cardeno�f _ E - t Rogetlo Madan x Lynda Westin E Elizabeth Wheaton Low e Resiliency Code Consultant Services _ '� .: Aggregate c z n Q3 - rc Totals QR Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal Qualitative Quantitative Subtotal AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 9D 0 90 1 83 0 83 3 93 0 93 2 80 0 80 2 86 0 86 3 11 2 O PZ Codesign,LLC 82 0 82 3 88 0 88 2 92 0 92 3 75 0 75 3 90 0 90 2•a 13 3 Perkins 8,Will Architects,Inc. 86 0 86 2 91 0 91 1 97 0 97 1 85 0 85 1 94 0 94 1 6 1 ,ou.NRs-tli'i Ponb ... Proposer Valaran'a POIMa Total Om atetM AECalTtnol sorvcae.Fc 0 O n Cedes,.LLC o Para a WC Node..k. o 0 FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY.FINAL RANKING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AWARD RECOMMENDATION. ATTACHMENT B ADDENDUM AND RFQ SOLICITATION /'v'\ I /\/\/\ I 1755 Meridian Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2019-209-ND RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES (the"RFQ") July 17,2019 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only(deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). 1. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: LTC#354-2019 2. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED. Q1: Page 5, 2. PURPOSE, 3rd para., "The final form of development practices that are currently being negotiated with de elopers would become part of the code.": Does this mean that the City's current land use, zoning, and permitting practices applicable to projects presently in permitting would be grandfathered into the new code? Al: The City's current land use, zoning, and permitting practices applicable to projects presently in permitting will be grandfathered into the new code. Q2: Page 5, 2. PURPOSE, 4th para., "A simplified use table will not affect any of the regulations and limitations that have been implemented over time in order to protect the quality of life of specific neighborhoods. All existing regulations, requirements and special restrictions on certain uses would be transferred to the body of the new code. The proposed form-based style code would also work in conjunction with existing Historic Preservation regulations in order to ensure that new construction is compatible with h`is$oric districts and sites.": As above, does this mean that the City's current land use and zoning regulations would be grandfathered into the new code? Does the City envision the new code will have a form of equivalency with present regulations (e.g. an equivalency matrix)? Which "certain uses" would have their existing regulations, requirements, and special restrictions transferred into the new code? A2: The city seeks simplification of the land development regulation which must be represented textually as well as graphically with the corresponding classifications that would facilitate interpretation of zoning classifications and uses. However, paragraph 5 provides that "...a form-based style resiliency code will enable the City to formulate a strategic plan that will continue i?o promote and protect the historic character of the distinct neighborhood, while identifying areas for sustainable growth and development." As such a full analysis of existing regulations, including uses, with recommendations for retention, amendment or elimination is expected. Q3: Page 6, 2. PURPOSE, 1st para., "Requirements and incentives for. Green Buildings would allow residents and businesses in new buildings to reduce their energy costs and carbon footprints. They may also incorporate regulations to allow buildings to respond to the effects of climate change and RFQ No.2019-209-ND Addendum#1 7/17/2019 M /� /( I Procurement Department /-'�f �! , i H 1755 Meridian Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov sea level rise in a manner that does not detract from the pedestrian environment. This is accomplished by prescribing raised frontage types that encourage interaction with the pedestrian environment where they are needed.": Does the City have other goals responding to climate change/sea level rise apart from raised frontage types? What specific goals does the City have regarding Green Buildings, e.g. does the City have specific targets for carbon footprint mitigation, energy performance,or other metrics? A3: The city is currently working on its resiliency strategy. However, it has supported the Sierra Club campaign.to become a 100% renewable energy city by 2050. In support of this goal there is a Green building ordinance in chapter 133 article I, which should be incorporated into the new code.as is or enhanced if possible. Q4: Pages 7 and 8, 11. DETERMINATION OF AWARD: Are the scoring considerations listed on page 8 assigned any specific points/weights (especially in relation to the Proposal Evaluation process described on page 15 SECTION 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION)? A4: Section 0100, Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions, Subsection 11. Determination of Award are not assigned any specific points/weights. Q5: Page 15, SECTION 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION: May respondents know who the Evaluation Committee members' are? A5: Please refer to Exhibit A, LTC#354.2019. Q6: Page 24, APPENDIX C Minimum Requirements & Special Conditions, 2. Statement of Work Required., 16th bullet, "Responsible for a minimum of six rounds of revisions that may become necessary during the adoption process.": Could the City kindly set a maximum number of revisions towards a firm delineation of the Basic Scope of Services? A6: The purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City) consultant for the(project. Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q7: Page. 25, APPENDIX C Minimum Requirements & Special Conditions, 2. Statement of Work Required,, 1st bullet, "Become familiar with the recent review of the development process and the recommendations off the Matrix consulting firm.": Grateful if the City could share that referenced document by the Matrix consulting firm with respondents. A7: The purpose of this. RFQ is to select the best qualified, (as determined by the City) consultant for the project. Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q8: Page 25, APPENDIX C Minimum Requirements & Special Conditions, 3. Special Conditions., 3.4 Indemnification: Would the City agree to mutual indemnification? A8: No, RFQ No.2019-209-ND Addendum#1 7/17/2019 i • A/\ I AhI�/ 1755 Meridian Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q9: Does the City have a specific timeline in mind: start date,completion date,duration? A9: The purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City) consultant for the project. Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q10: Has the City separately engaged other disciplines/consultants relevant to the contemplated scope of work, or other work that would impact this scope? Or is there an expectation that the selected consultant engage all other disciplines, i.e, land use law, transportation, historic conservation, environment/sustainability,civil engineering/infrastructure etc.? A10: Consultant is to engage all sub-disciplines required to deliver the code. The city will provide related studies, data, and historical expertise and knowledge that may assist the consultant in the analysis and preparation of the deliverables. Q11: What specific base information exists in the City's possession for the anticipated scope of work, and what additional info-mation is the consultant team expected to prepare and/or gather? All: The city will be able to provide access to current land development regulations, comprehensive plan, ongoing and future resiliency initiatives, studies (historical and in progress). The consultant is expected to gather necessary information for the preparation of the code, including best practices implemented in other cities comparable to the City of Miami Beach as well as all local and state regulations that impact land development. However, the purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City) consultant for the project. Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q12: Are market studies available, or required as part of the process? Al2: The city will provide all studies recently conducted, but market studies are subject to' changing market conditions and may nothave relevancy at time of analysis. It is up to the consultant to determine if and for what areas of the city a market study would be necessary and include as a sub-discipline. However, the purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City) consultant for the project. Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms, and cost. Q13: Grateful if the City could describe in more detail the degree of public engagement anticipated for this scope of work, incl ding existing social media platforms and electronic delivery services utilized by, the City and could be made available to the chosen consultant. A13: The purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City) consultant for the project. Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. RFQ No.2019-209-ND Addendum#1 7/17/2019 ( /� .J� /� I BEACH tv'\ I Jam' �/ , 1755 Meridian Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl,gov • Q14: Is there an allocated budget or estimated fee for the scope specified in this RFQ? If so, can it be made known to applicants? A14: At the present time there in no allocated budget or estimated fee for the scope of this RFQ. The purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City) • consultant for the project. After selection the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q15: Is there a requirement that the proposing firm have a local office? If there is no local office requirement, how much is the existence of alocal office weighted in the formula? A15: There is no local office requirement. Please refer to Section 0400, Proposal Evaluation, page 13 of the RFQ,fora breakdown of the evaluation criteria. Q16: Is there an estimated budget for the project? A16: See response to item Q14 above. Q17: Can a reference be a project we are currently working on? A17: A reference can be a project you are currently working on. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders"questionnaire imith the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sinc: : Alex Den'.. P . -ment Director RFQ No.2019-209-ND Addendum#1 7/16/2019 MIAMI Procurement Department 1755 Meridian Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • EXHIBIT A LTC # 354-2019 RFQ No.2019-209-ND Addendum#1 7/17/2019 p> EEAC�5f OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LTC # 354-201.9 LETTER TO COMMISSION TO: Mayor Dan Gelbe and Members of t e City Com ission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: June 19, 2019 SUBJECT: Evaluation Committee Relative to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2019-209-ND, for Resiliency Code Consultant Services The purpose of this LTC is to update the Mayor and City Commission on the status of Request for Qualifications(RFQ) No.2019-209-ND,which seeks to contract with a consultant who would be tasked with performing analysis and drafting of a resiliency code, as well as facilitating appropriate community outreach. The City will receive proposals pursuant to this RFQ on July 23,2019.The responsive proposals will be reviewed by the Evaluation Committee in accordance with the criteria established in the RFQ. I am considering appointing the following individuals to serve on the Evaluation Committee: • Hernan Cardeno, Director, Code Compliance Department, City of Miami Beach • David Martinez, Director, Office of Capital Improvement Projects, City of Miami Beach • Carmen Sanchez, Deputy Planning Director, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Lynda Westin, Transportation Manager, Transportation Department, City of Miami Beach • Elizabeth Wheaton, Director, Environment and Sustainability Department, City of Miami Beach I am also considering the following individuals as alternates: • Michael Belush, Chief of Planning and Zoning, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach • Jose Gonzalez, Director,Transportation Department, City of Miami Beach • Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability, Planning Department, City of Miami Beach I would appreciate any comments and/or suggestions you may have by Tuesday, June 25, 2019. Thank you. C: Mark Taxis, Assistant City Manager /ale Denis, Director, Procurement Department Irtl14. JLM/ST/TM/• ; :/N F:\PURL\Solicitations1201912019-209-ND_RFQ_Resiliency Consultant Services114-LTCsILTC.doc 11V\l BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS ' SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS 2 0200 GENERAL CONDITIONS 6 0300 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 9 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION 12 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION AND QUESTIONNAIRE 13 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 18 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 20 SECTION 0100 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS&GENERAL CONDITIONS RFQ 2019-209-ND 1 MIAMI BEACH 1.GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the "City"), as the means for prospective Proposers to submit proposals for the City's consideration in evaluating qualifications to select a firm with whom it may negotiate an agreement for the purpose noted herein. Prospective Proposers that have obtained this solicitation in any manner other than via BidSync(www.bidsync.com) are advised that the City utilizes BidSync (www.bidsync.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any Prospective Proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through BidSync must register immediately with BidSync to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The City's current land development regulations are prescriptive in nature and generally difficult to read and clearly understand. The regulations contain complex and often overlapping criteria for permitted and conditional uses, development regulations and overly districts. The regulations generally do not sufficiently address how a building is oriented on a site, impacts surrounding sites, or affects the pedestrian environment and public realm. Over the last few decades, this has created the peed for lengthy and complicated negotiations between City staff and developers in order to achieve sound planning and development practices. The regulations, which were adopted in 1989, have not be reviewed and updated, butlthey have been amended in a frequent and piecemeal manner over the last 30 years. The Administration believes that the City and its residents would benefit from a simplification of the manner in which these regulations are presented, and that a form-based style approach is best suited for this task. By means of this RFQ, the City seeks to contract with a consultant who would be tasked with performing the analysis and drafting of the code, as well as facilitating appropriate community outreach. The Administration would assist as needed in order to reduce costs, and would provide the institutional knowledge needed to properly convert the existing, prescriptive based land development regulations, into a form-based style document. A form-based style resiliency code,tailored specifically to Miami Beach,would simplify permitted and conditional use requirements,focusing on building orientation,scale, context, and building frontages. The final form of development practices that are currently being negotiated with developers would become part of the code.This would provide City staff, developers and the community with clear and consistent rules and regulations to which new development must conform. Additionally, the manner in which permitted and conditional uses are set forth would be simplified, thus allowing a property owner, residenf, prospective buyer or developer to quickly decipher what types of uses are permitted on a site. A simplified use table will not affect any of the regulations and limitations that have been implemented over time in order to protect the quality of life of specific neighborhoods. All existing regulations, requirements and special restrictions on certain uses would be transferred to the body of the new code. The proposed form-based style code would also work in conjunction with existing Historic Preservation regulations in order to ensure that new construction is compatible with historic districts and sites. The adoption of a form-based style resiliency code will enable the City to formulate a strategic plan that will continue to promote and protect the historic character of the distinct neighborhoods, while identifying areas for sustainable growth and development. Developers will have a clear understanding of the areas that are available for growth and will be able to focus their resources on projects that can succeed. The predictability that comes from this knowledge will encourage residential and commercial investment that will benefit both the City and its residents. Form-based style resiliency codes easily incorporate sustainable practices. Requirements and incentives for Green RFQ 2019-209-ND 2 MIAMI BEACH Buildings would allow residents and businessesin new buildings to reduce their energy costs and carbon footprints. They may also incorporate regulations to allow buildings to respond to the effects of climate change and sea level rise in a manner that does not detract from the pedestrian environment. This is accomplished by prescribing raised frontage types that encourage interaction with the pedestrian environment where they are needed. 3.ANTICIPATED RFQ TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: RFQ Issued June 7,2019 Pre-Proposal Meeting June 19,2019 at 10:00 a.m. ET Deadline for Receipt of Questions July 2, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. ET Responses Due July 23,2019 at 3:00 p.m. ET Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing TBD Negotiations Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7490 nataliadelsado• miamibeachfl..ov additionally, the City Clerk is to be copied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranadoa(�.miamibeachfl.gov; or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. The Proposal title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-888-270-9936(Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 9415468 RFQ 2019-209-ND 3 MIAMI BEACH Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through BidSync. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through BidSync must register immediately with BidSync to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, ass prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado a(�miamibeachfl.gov 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION. After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposers (or Proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability(including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). 9. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 10.VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise, and which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer, by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount(or in this RFQ,the highest proposal amount). 11.DETERMINATION OF AWARD;.The final ranking results of the evaluation process will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability,capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or RFQ 2019-209-ND 4 MIAMI BEACH interference. (3)The character, integrity, reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. 12. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank RFQ 2019-209-ND 5 iV\IANI BEACH SECTION 0200 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.GENERAL DISCLAIMERS. a.The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the 5.COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience.Any action This RFQ is subject to,and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar , taken by the City in response to Proposals made pursuant to this solicitation, with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for to such Proposals, or in cancelling awards,or in withdrawing or cancelling ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as any liability or obligation on the part of the Cit).In its sole discretion,the City prescribed therein, including disqualification of their responses,in the event of may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving proposals,may such non-compliance. accept or reject proposals,and may accept proposals which deviate from the solicitation, as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole 6.CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-37379, discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that party or parties submitting Proposals in response to this solicitation. Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to b.The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among prospective Proposers.It is the responsibility bf the recipient to assure itself others,the conflict of interest,lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami that information contained herein is accurate land complete.The City does Beach and Miami Dade County. not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted 7. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT_(ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to communications with City officials, shall bel at the recipient's own risk. request material in accessible format;sign language interpreters(five(5)days Proposers should rely exclusively on their ownlinvestigations,interpretations, in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public warranty or representation,express or implied,)as to its content,its accuracy, Works Department,at 305-673-7000,Extension 2984. or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Proposal conforming to these requirements will be selected 8.POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS.The for consideration,negotiation,or approval. City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and will make a reasonable effort to give at least three(3) calendar days written c. Proposers are hereby advised that this (solicitation is subject to the notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through BidSync. following ordinances/resolutions,which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach website: 9. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any http:llweb.miamibeachfl.govlprocurement/scrol.aspx?id=79113 recommendation for selection of award in accordance with the proceedings •CONE OF SILENCE—SECTION 2-486 established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in •PROTEST PROCEDURES—CODE SECTION 2-371 Sections 2-370 and 2-371 of the City Code(the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). •DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS—SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES—SECTIONS 2- Ordinance shall be barred. 481 THROUGH 2-406 •CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS—SECTION 2-487 10.JOINT VENTURES I SINGLE PURPOSE ENTITY. Joint Ventures are not 'CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS —SECTION -488 allowed. Proposals shall be submitted only by the prime contractor. Proposals -EQUAL BENEFITS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS—SECTION 2-373 may, however, identify other sub-contractors or sub-consultants to the prime •FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE—SECTION 701300 Proposer who may serve as team members. •ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES—SECTION 2-449 11. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City 2.PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME.A person or affiliate who has been placed on the Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled submit a proposal on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public by a veteran(s)or which is a.service-disabled veteran business enterprise,and entity, may not submit a proposal on a contract with a public entity for the which is within five percent (5%) of the lowest responsive, responsible proposer,by providing such proposer an opportunity of providing said goods or construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit a contractual services for the lowest responsive proposal amount(or in this RFQ, proposal on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a the highest proposal amount). Whenever, as a result of the foregoing Preference,the adjusted prices of two(2)or more proposers which are a small contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s) or a service-disabled CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest proposal pursuant to an RFQ the convicted vendor list. or oral or written request for quotation, and such proposals are responsive, responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service,then the 3.COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS.This RFQ is subject award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City 12.AGREEMENT BY PROPOSERS.Any individual that submits a proposal in lobbyist laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, response to this solicitation agrees to the following: as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their Any action taken by the City in response to Proposals made pursuant to this responses,in the event of such non-compliance. solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Proposals, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or • 4.DEBARMENT ORDINANCE:This RFQ is subjlect to,and all proposers are cancelling this solicitation, either before or after issuance of an award, expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. 6 RFQ 2019-209-ND MIAMI BEACH The City may,at its sole and absolute discretion,reject any and all,or parts of for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. any and all,responses;re-advertise this RFQ;postpone or cancel,at any time, this RFQ process;or waive any irregularities in this RFQ,or in any responses 22.MANNER OF PERFORMANCE.Proposer agrees to perform its duties and received as a result of this RFQ. obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State, County,and Federal laws, rules, regulations and codes. Lack of Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the work and proposal opening date.In accordance with Section 47 below,a Proposer may services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated,trained, withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hlmdred twenty (120) calendar experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their days from the date of proposal opening, by delivering written notice of designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all withdrawal to the Procurement Department documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration currently required by applicable laws, rules,and regulations. Proposer further 13. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS. All expenses involved with the certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, preparation and submission of Proposals,or anykrork performed in connection authorizations,or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full therewith, shall be the sole responsibility (and shall be at the sole cost and force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 14.RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City,and Proposers Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property hereby acknowledge and agree,that the successful Proposer is considered to to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract be an independent contractor,and that neither the Proposer,nor the Proposer's resulting from this solicitation,the contractor will assume the full duty,obligation employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance,and considered employees or agents of the City. assure all work complies with all applicable laws.The contractor shall be liable for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the Proposer, 15. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter or its officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,for failure to comply with 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the applicable laws. Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained 23.SPECIAL CONDITIONS.Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from from the manufacturer. these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 16. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to 24.NON-DISCRIMINATION.The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with • consider a Proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202,Executive Order 11246, regulations in investigating a Proposers responsibility,and further reserves the as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment right to declare a Proposer not responsible if thelhistory of violations warrants opportunity for all persons without regard to race,color,religion,sex or national such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and Chapter 62 of the City Code,Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of dispositions thereof.The non-submission of any such documentation shall be race, color, national origin, religion,sex, intersexuality, gender identity, sexual deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or orientation,disability,marital and familial status,age,ancestry,height,weight, violations.Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or domestic partner status,labor organization membership,familial situation,and violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and political affiliation. during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The City may consider any 17.TAXES.The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications State taxes. and abilities of a Proposer,including past performance(experience)in making an award that is in the best interest of the City,including: 18. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions award of contract. pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this solicitation. 19.PAYMENT.Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices equipment,and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform must be consistent with Purchase Order format. the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this solicitation. 20. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, construed to mean a fully-equipped and well-established company in line contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost with the best business practices in the industry,and as determined by the and expenses for,or on account of,any copyrighted, patented,or unpatented City. invention, process,or article manufactured or used in the performance of the E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, contract,including its use by the City of Miami Beach,Florida. If the Proposer technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including uses any design,device or materials covered by letters,patent,or copyright,it past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best is mutually understood and agreed,without excepton,that the proposal prices interest of the City. shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design,device,or F. The City may require Proposer to show proof that it has been designated materials in any way involved in the work. as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require 21. DEFAULT. Failure or refusal of the successful Proposer to execute a material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, contract following approval of such contract bye the City Commission, or _ packaging,and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. untimely withdrawal of a proposal response before such award is made and approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City,and may be grounds 26.ASSIGNMENT.The successful Proposer shall not assign,transfer,convey, 7 RFQ 2019-209-ND MIAMI BEACH sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract,including any or all of its right,title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any 33.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS.Proposers are expected to be familiar with,and person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. comply with,all Federal,State, County,and City laws,ordinances,codes,rules and regulations,and all orders 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which,in any pay for all licenses,permits,and inspection fees required to complete the work manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this and shall comply with all applicable laws. RFQ(including,without limitation,the Americans with Disabilities Act,Title VII of the Civil Rights Act,the EEOC Uniform Guidelines,and all EEO regulations 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer is in and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s)on the part of the Proposer will in no agreement,other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit agency. 34.CONFLICT OF INTEREST.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member 29.VOLUME OF WORK.To the extent applicable,it is the intent of the City to (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation. However, Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more State or other governmental contracts, or on an as-needed basis through the in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. City's spot market purchase provisions. 35. MODIFICATIONIWITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS. A Proposer may 30.DISPUTES.In the event of a conflict between the documents,the order of submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously priority of the documents shall be as follows: submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered.Proposals then shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking Proposal due date,or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of precedence;then Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the C. The solicitation;then Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. received after contract award will not be considered. 31.INDEMNIFICATION.The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the 36.EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ.Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions City and its officers,employees,agents and instrumentalities from any and all they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ,and outline what,if any, liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be which the City or its officers,employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur included and clearly delineated,in writing,in the Proposal. The City,at its as a result of claims,demands,suits,causes of actions or proceedings of any sole and absolute discretion,may accept or reject any or all exceptions kind or nature arising out of,relating to or resulting from the performance of the and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are agreement by the contractor or its employees', agents, servants, partners, rejected,the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular principals or subcontractors. The contractor shall pay all claims and losses in term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to(as connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or said term and/or condition was originally set forth in the RFQ and any actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, exhibits or Addenda thereto). including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereoh. The Proposer expressly 37. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by any offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, agreement with the City or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way employee,or agent of the City,for the purpose of influencing consideration of limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec.2-449 of the'City Code,no officer or employee City or its officers,employees,agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. of this Agreement. 38. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request 32.FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW.Proposers are hereby notified that all supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ Proposals including, without limitation, any and all information and solicitation process,unless otherwise noted herein. documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1),Florida Statutes,and s.24(a),Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank decision or until thirty(30) days after opening of the proposals,whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law;(c)Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law;(d)Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the contractor upon • termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 8 RFQ 2019-209-ND SECTION 0300 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Proposal (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, Proposer name, Proposer return address. Proposals received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE PROPOSALS. Proposals are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Proposals.Any Proposal received after the deadline established for receipt of proposals will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to Proposer unopened.The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. NON-RESPONSIVENESS. Failure to comply with the following'requirements shall result in a determination of non-responsivene s. Non-responsive proposals will not be considered. 1. Failure to submit a signed copy of Appendix A. 2. Failure to comply with the Minimum Eligibility Requirements (See Appendix C, Section 1). 4. OMITTED OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. With exception of the Proposal Certification Form (Appendix A-1)and the Cost/Reveriue Proposal, if applicable,the City reserves the right to seek any omitted information/documentation or any additional information from Proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the Proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. Failure to submit any omitted or additional information in accordance with the City's request shall result in proposal being deemed non- responsive. 5. PROPOSAL FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of proposals, it is strongly recommended that proposals be organized and tabbed in accordance with the tabs] and sections as specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. TAB 1 Cover Letter& Minimum Qualification Requirements 1.1 Cover Letter and Table of Cbntents. The cover lettermust indicate Proposer and Proposer Primary Contact for the purposes of this solicitation. The table of contents should indicate the tabs, sections with tabs and page numbers to facilitate the evaluation committee's review. 1.2 Proposal Certification Form (Appendix A-1). Failure to submit the Proposal Certification Form with the Proposal shall result in Proposal being deemed non-responsive. 1.3 Questionnaire&Requirements Affidavit(Appendix A-2). 1.4 Minimum Qualifications Requirements. Submit verifiable information documenting compliance with the minimum qualifications requirements established in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. RFQ 2019-209-ND 9 TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Organizational Chart. Provide an organizational chart of all the prime proposer's personnel, each team members' qualifications and the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein. A resume of each individual, including education, licensure, relevant experience, and any other pertinent information, shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the relevant experience and proven track record of the firm and/or its principals in providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the Proposer submits as evidence of similar experience for the firm and/or any principal, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact,contact telephone &email, and year(s) and term of engagement. For each project, identify the relevant experience to the following areas and whether the experience is for he firm or for a principal (include name of principal). • Participation in the drafting of a citywide form-based style code, incorporating resiliency and sustainability standards and components, which was adopted by the local governing board fora developed city with a population equal to or greater than the population of Miami Beach. • Experience in wri ing and implementing municipal land development regulations, including existing non-conforming structures and uses. • Knowledge of Chapter 163 Part II, and other related Florida Statutes (Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulations) and the ability to ensure that municipal land development regulations comply with the statute's regulations. • Familiarity with the work of the Southeast Florida Climate Compact and its work products, including the Regional Climate Action Plan and the unified sea level rise projections. • Ability to develop land use regulations that adapt a built environment in communities experiencing the effects of sea level rise or that are prone to flooding. • Experience with drafting and implementing guidelines for historic preservation and development compatible with historic sites or districts. • Experience in identifying, evaluating, codifying, and explaining the essential qualities of community design and character. • Experience with drafting and implementing urban condition landscaping regulations. • Experience in building community consensus • Strong graphic skills. • Knowledge in land development processes and methods to streamline processes while maintaining high standards. RFQ 2019-209-ND 10 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team. Submit detailed information regarding team member's history and relevant experience and proven track record of providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the Proposer submits as evidence of similar experience, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. For each project, identify the relevant,experience to the following areas and whether the experience is for the team member. • Participation in the drafting of a citywide form-based style code, incorporating resiliency and sustainabilityl standards and components, which was adopted by the local governing board for a developed city with a population equal to or greater than the population of Miami Beach. • Experience in writing and implementing municipal land development regulations, including existing non-conforming structures and uses. • Knowledge of Chapter 163 Part II, and other related Florida Statutes (Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulations) and the ability to ensure that municipal land development regulations comply with the statute's regulations. • Familiarity with the work of the Southeast Florida Climate Compact and its work products, including the Regional Climate Action Plan and the unified sea level rise projections. • Ability to develop land use regulations that adapt a built environment in communities experiencing the effects of sea level rise or that are prone to flooding. • Experience with drafting and implementing guidelines for historic preservation and development compatible with historic sites or districts. • Experience in identifying, evaluating, codifying, and explaining the essential qualities of community design',and character. • Experience with drafting and implementing urban condition landscaping regulations. • Experience in building community consensus • Strong graphic skills. • Knowledge in land development processes and methods to streamline processes while maintaining high standards. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology Submit detailed information on they approach and methodology that the Proposer and its team has utilized on previous engagements to accomplish a similar scope of work, including detailed information, which addresses, but need not be limited to: data collection, stakeholder input, project schedule or timeline, strategies for assuring the resulting resilience code meets the needs of the client currently and into the future. • RFQ 2019-209-ND 1 1 SECTION 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee.An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, may meet to evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the qualitative criteria set forth below. City staff will assign points for the quantitative criteria. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee is advisory only and does pot make an award recommendation to the City Manager or the City Commission.The results of Step 1 &Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. a. In the event tat only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFQ, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. b. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Qualitative Criteria. Responsive proposals shall be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria. Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Experience and Qualifications 60 Approach and Methodology 40 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Quantitative Criteria. Following the results of the evaluation of the qualitative criteria by the Evaluation Committee, the Proposers may receive additional points, to be added by City staff, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Maximum Points Veterans Preference 5 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 5 4. Determination of Final Ranking. The sum of qualitative and quantitative scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer A Proposer B Proposer C Ste• 1 Points 82 76 80 Committee;- Ste•2 Points 22 15 12 Member 1`� �` Total 104 91 92 Rank 1 3 2 Ste. 1 Points 79 85 72 Committee Ste.2 Points 22 15 12 Member 2 Total 101 100 84 Rank, 1 : 2 3 Ste. 1 Points 80 74 66 Committee: . Ste.2 Points 22 15 12 Member 2 Total 102 89 78 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking* 1 2 3 RFQ 2019-209-ND 12 • APPENDIX A t �^ t. �y S ° r to y ti i F iii tA u i :M1 Proposal Certification and Questionnaire & . Requirements Affidavit REQ No. 2019-209-ND RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RFQ 2019-209-ND 13 APPENDIX Al -PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM This document is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM WITH ITS PROPOSAL SHALL RESULT IN THE PROPOSAL BEING DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2019-209-ND Resiliency Code Consultant Services Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000,Ext.6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov PROPOSER'S NAME: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: • ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: Except as stipulated in General Condition 36, Proposer agrees: to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive df this solicitation, all specifications, attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto;to bel bound, at a minimum,to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained herein or Addenda; that the Proposer has notl divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to anYl other proposal;that proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; that all responses, data and information contained in the proposal are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: • Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: 14 RFQ 2019-209-ND APPENDIX A2-QUESTIONNAIRE AND REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT FORM The purpose of this Proposal Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposers of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposers in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated.Attach any requested information. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: 1. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly, an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 2. References & Past Performance. Proposer shall attach at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-'erformance by anpublic sector agency? YES J NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 though 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling fnancial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Balance of Page Intentionally Leff Blank 15 RFC) 2019-209-ND • :-•- •� • _ , .. ; • •••-•'- _ __ • • . •_ •- = • - • _- = ••. • •:. • • • • :-•- portal,LCP Tracker(LCPTrackcLnet). YES NO 6. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States,but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with (same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the"other"section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick Leave I • i Family Medical Leave Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis,you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application(attached) with all necessary documentation)Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at httr://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/procurement/procurement-related-ordinance-and-procedures/ 16 RFQ 2019-209-ND 7. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375,the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or servsces sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375. Failure to agree shall result in proposal disqualification. YES NO 8. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, bydsinc.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 17 RFC) 2019-209-ND APPENDIX B 9 1- � "t _ -4. f it { v i. =- - 1 g; e k,�� !,,1, l j .._�: i f� k x i 1 s ci a ,:3 }_ ' ;3 ,a a" `a ,1 to �,.',7:1".'4§''' €�.«:i. % ?..,. s ` ; d " No Bid " Form R FQ No. 2019-209-ND RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 . , .., M^.? erhA7 333139 $"Miami Beach, Florida idian xedFloor f. rMica ronsof• rx -i. ,..-'! e " e ve:®gin . ., .7.; �; frs 8,,,,..,,,,,;,:g.,,.,:,eze `r v �u ra i1e � o to :es �� x µ omso t a iie o bp ' `$ ( � g 0 c . ' T - ae e of oB'dprde� ^ ; QfB d, A h ,e � the S ; ti ��9o; ®Z 4'{ 9 x3 ` �NCa x�o ' k "w , " A .,•„,;7,4, va , aa fi�"(.iIs od f 4.7* , , 61 \ � y t -.„ag " f ' .. , a .' zy, rW , c r4 s€ ,�" d , > F , .M t ;40.4 ons-:_: ,Y . x zi ..,. ,. _ r ,.. ,j14 h RFQ 2019-209-ND 18 Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to submit a proposal Insufficient ime to respond Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service _OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in youd company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: NATALIA DELGADO PROPOSAL#2019-209-IND 1755 MERIDIAN AVENUE, VI FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 RFQ 2019-209-ND 19 APPENDIX C �j .o1.[ 3 ,.,,.,a 1 1 i L 'g 1 r iq 3� f d 1'I 3 a 4S Minimum Requirements & Special Conditions R FQ No. 2019-209-ND RESILIENCY CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor • Miami Beach, Florida 33139 • RFQ 2019-209-ND 20� 1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. The Minimum Eligibility Requirements for this solicitation are listed below. Proposer shall submit the required submittal(s) documenting compliance with each minimum requirement. Proposers that fail to comply with minimum requirements shall be deemed non-responsive and shall not have its proposal considered. 1. Project team (including prime consultant and sub-consultants) shall have a minimum of three (3) years of prior experience in each of the following areas: architecture, land use law, planning and urban design, landscape architecture, and sustainability and resiliency. Required Submittals: For each qualifying project, submit project name, project description, start anld completion dates, project contact information (phone and email), volume of contract,prime proposer's principle role in project. 2.Statement of Work Relquired. The Administration believes that the City and its residents would benefit from a simplification of the manner in which the City'Is current land development regulations are presented, and that a form- based style approach is best suited for this task. By means of this RFQ, the City seeks to contract with a consultant who would be tasked with performing the analysis and drafting of the code, as well as facilitating appropriate community outreach. The Administration would assist as needed in order to reduce costs, and would provide the institutional knowledge needed to properly convert the existing, prescriptive biased land development regulations, into a form-based style document. Proposer team shall provide the following professional services: • Review and prepare an analysis of the city's built environment and land development regulations • Review the city's comprehensive plan for sections that address land use and land development • Review the City's strategic plan including City Commission vision and goals • Review county, state and federal regulations being proposed which may affect land use and land development. Including but not limited to compliance with the State of Florida Religious Freedom Restoration Act, legalization of medical cannabis, etc. • Prepare recommendations where modifications may be warranted • Draft initial zoning regulations that incorporate existing intensities heights and uses • Draft maps identifying areas by proposed zoning designations • Present draft to community during workshop session. Conduct no less than four (4) public workshops • Refine draft code and maps based • Identify sections of the city's comprehensive plan that require amendment to be consistent with the proposed code • Prepare final dode for the adoption process • Refine draft code and maps based on amendments during the adoption process • Be available to brief public officials at the direction of city staff (via conference calls acceptable) • Present recommendations to the Land Use Committee and to City Commission • Conduct weekly progress briefings with staff(conference calls acceptable) and prior to any public presentation of drafts and final edited code • Responsible for a minimum of six rounds of revisions that may become necessary during the adoption process. • Have a working knowledge of Miami Beach's climate adaptation approach including RFQ 2019-209-ND 21 recent land use ordinance updates and the City's stormwater management program and transportation master plan. ■ Become familiar with the recent review of the development process and the recommendations of the Matrix consulting firm. 3.Special Conditions. 3.1 Term of Contract: It is expected that any resulting agreement shall be valid for a term of three (3) years from effective date. The City Manager may approve two (2) additional one (1) year renewal periods based on satisfactory performance. 3.2 Change of Project Manager. A change in the Consultant's project manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee. Replacement(including reassignment)of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(i.e.the City project manager). 3.3 Sub-Consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability'to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. 3.4 Indemnification. Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liability, losses or damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur, as a result of claims,demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from the performance of this Agreement by the Provider or its employees, agents, servants, partners principals or subcontractors. Provider shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Provider expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Provider shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein(provided. 3.5 Licensure. Consultant shall hold a "Certificate of Authorization" or an "Architect Business" certification from State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations. 3.7 Accreditation/Certification. Consultant, or its sub-consultant(s), shall demonstrate active accreditation or certification by the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) — US Green Building Council, Urban Land Institute (ULI),American Institute of Architects (AIA), and the Florida Bar. RFQ 2019-209-ND 22 ATTACHMENT C SUNBIZ & PROPOSAL RESPONSE TO RFQ Detail by FEUEIN Number Page 1 of 3 Florida Department of State Dmtsioe of CORPORATIONS � x S tai( u r ' Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number/ Detail by FEI/EIN•Number Foreign Profit Corporation PERKINS&WILL ARCHITECTS INC Filing Information Document Number 8291284 FEI/EIN Number 36-2679146 Date Filed 12/29/1972 State DE Status ACTIVE Last Event CORPORATE MERGER Event Date Filed 05/12/1975 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address THE WRIGLEY BUILDING 410 N MICHIGAN AVENUE SUITE 1600 CHICAGO,IL 60611 Changed:04/26/2016 Mailing Address 2 BRYANT STREET SUITE 300 San Francisco,CA 94105 Changed:04/26/2016 Registered Agent Name&Address CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 1201 HAYS STREET TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 Name Changed: 12/19/2013 Address Changed: 12/19/2013 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title SECRETARY,Treasurer STEPHENS, BRODIE httn•//epapi,h ciinhivnrv/Tnnniru/CnrnnratinnCparrh/CParrhPpcilltTlptaii7innnirvtvnp—Ppi ti R/7/7(110 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 2 of 3 2 BRYANT STREET SUITE 300 • San Francisco,CA 94105 Title President and Director HARRISON,PHILIP L 1315 PEACHTREE ST., NE ATLANTA,GA 30309 Title VICE PRESIDENT GELABERT-NAVIA,JOSE A 2800 PONCE DE LEON BLVD SUITE 1300 CORAL GABLES,FL 33134 Title VICE PRESIDENT ALVAREZ,LEONARDO 1315 PEACHTREE ST NE ATLANTA,GA 30309 Title Director Mah,Jean 617 W.7th Street Suite 1200 Los Angeles,CA 90017 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2017 04/12/2017 2018 01/30/2018 2019 02/04/2019 Document Images 02/04/2019—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/30/2018—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/12/2017--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/26/2016--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/1912015--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format • 02/13/2014--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 12/19/2013--Req.Agent Change View image in PDF format 01/31/2013—AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2013--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2012--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/06/2011--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/19/2010—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/20/2009—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2008—ANNUAL REPORT httn•//caarnln et nhiv nrrrIInnllin!/rnrnnratinnCaarnh/CaarrhOacnitTlatai19inn-miircrtvna-1:PiNTI 2/')/')(11 0 Detail by FEI/EIN Number Page 3 of 3 View image in PDF format 10/26/2007—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/02/2007--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/04/2006--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/21/2005—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2004--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2003--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/11/2002--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/31/2001--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/01/2000--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/23/1999--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/06/1998--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/28/1997—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/11/1996--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/16/1995—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Fbriaa Departr.,_rt c1 Stat•.Divis.,n o..-vrperat.e. T'1+'}'N•/�nAnrn�'I n11r1M1'7 IIYRilY111111M/inleversr eeni11111\O•]YnNaQ..ventiKPelviiT1Pfa;1/1Hlllllm/t[/YIP=HPli\T11 21111n1 a _ ,, Miami Beach , ,_ Resiliency ...... .„ „,.,.. ‘„ tst t Code ��` Consultant Services ,; ;;....„. X . E r iti cV Request for Qualifications �r RFQ 2019-209-N D 10 : l' M . � �. ;. 5 Fi y 4. July 23,2019 i '." •.a�•^�^' ,, i_ — . 4,....,-— ., jit' .y. ,. w .., : 'y? .... ^,H .,aT .�^P ;gy& 7 "�.', 'tom ,11" `� �, rte "" .4 jail ' 1'±� A�Sr+rwnl► pr a •': '- 2 .j.. ..»-*J. ..." =_+_.. "ate» � rs M. ' y . , ...._.: - «R r�is++• lir—NT.- r .p :iyY.yG �,r�.,;Y�� .. �'• aYdA .� (�':" ,.. . K... , r� NT.-. ..•: "7-"..: .'""`", Art€'-:`'. �,...- :•.st""% 1,- � '#'„ .m s ^1 �yyw t � E.::_"..„*"."--- Z a•fs � ..a.. � fes! a' � y' _ � t ..47$1 . '--rte- � `. 7 - ;. ,II'. - ��owl 1 r .7,14-.,"f .! },�•a ,"' 'S� f _ 7.i+�.^ I F a` �-ter J � 4 • -. .T. ! . 1 ..,d. as. _ � ' is e 4 ,: ,..4+vi y r 9r � �+ 1j Kt r "T�. *. r t •yj/t" 4• p AK / w� 4 � f::-- � A *� ...'moi « . ` ' . •j+.ig€". ! v3 . ".„.rrg •" "Efrp..K 0* Ca. e -1 ` � w, -.., ' ait.i„� .YI{1 t ;i � -�7� .dE - -i - V_-. i - —nom- 'Y'a^ S. _ _ o 1` ,•»... .:..,,,,...,,,41-4.4_ :X , ^4 r I, r • - r1 ^^^ R � } ^III• fd r1ry• . �i ef i'. •• Perkins&Will TAB 01. Cover Letter & Minimum Qualification Requirements Perkins&Will July 23,2019 Natalia Delgado Procurement Department,Miami Beach 1755 Meridian Avenue,3rd Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Re:Resiliency Code Consulting Services-RFQ 2019-209-ND Dear Ms.Delgado and Members of the Selection Committee, The City of Miami Beach's Request for Qualifications for a new Form-Based Resiliency Code is coming at a time when issues of urban growth,sustainability,and sea-level rise have become critical and our region is garnering attention as the'Ground Zero'of the problem.It is our hope that this new code will be the start of a solution. Perkins and Will has been actively involved in the City of Miami Beach for over twenty-five years. During that period,we have designed a variety of new structures which are now part of the indelible fabric of the City:from the Winterhaven and Victor Hotels on Ocean Drive,to the Miami Beach City Hall Annex.More recently we have designed three projects on Alton Road which hove all met challenges related to issues that this code will address. With a local office of 60+design professionals,and a national team of over 2,700,we considered responding to this RFQ with only a Perkins and Will internal team.At the same time,we understood that this project was too important to not give the City of Miami Beach the best experts and consultants that our locally led team could harness.To this end,we have structured our team into two separate but complementary groups:Design/Resiliency and Community Outreach/Implementation. Design/Resiliency:Our Urban Design Team will be led by Paul Kulig,who has directed several major efforts in the City of Toronto for 15 years and has recently completed the Downtown Building for Liveability study-where the issues strongly parallel those of Miami Beach.Paul has also led Perkins and Will's work with 100 Resilient Cities,serving as the Strategy Partner for Toronto,Louisville and Minneapolis.Our Landscape Team will be led by Leo Alvarez,who has completed landscape guidelines and plans for four distinct neighborhoods in Miami Beach.Leo was also the key figure in the design of Atlanta's groundbreaking Beltline Project.Our Resiliency Strategy will be developed by Doug Pierce, who wrote the RELi standards which in 2017 was adopted by the USGBC and the CBCI as their guidelines to offer greater adaptability and resilience to communities after weather and natural disasters.Doug,Leo and Paul will be working together with Coastal Systems International,the acknowledged leader in engineering systems to address sea-level rise. Community Outreach/Implementation:The City of Miami Beach does not need another document to file and shelve.Miami Beach needs a workable,usable,strategy that can be implemented sooner rather than later:Time is of the essence.To this end,we have asked Ana Gelabert-Sanchez AICP,the former Planning Director of the City of Miami who was responsible for executing the visionary Miami 21 to lead our implementation team. 2800 Ponce De Leon Blvd.,#1300 Coral Gables,Florida 33134 www.perkinswill.com 5 Perkins&Will July 23,2019 Ana will be working not only with the Perkins and Will Design/Resiliency Team,but will also be involved in Community Outreach,working with Michael Laos of the Sustainable Futures Group, Re:Resiliency Code and with Nancy Stroud of Lewis,Stroud and Deutsch,who is both a Planner and a Land Use Consulting Services RFQ 2019-209-ND Attorney. Nancy will provide the legal framework necessary for the formal enactment into law as she provided previously as the legal expert under Miami 21.Juan Mullerat of Plusurbia,a nationally recognized Form-Based Code expert will be working with both the Implementation and the Design Team to create a user-friendly document which will form the basis for the new Code that will guide all future planning and construction. Perkins and Will believes that this new Form-Based Resiliency Code can not only be a national model for complex urban centers,but also a new standard that will further enhance and improve the quality of urban life in the City of Miami Beach. We look forward to an opportunity to present to your selection committee and to circle back on an engagement that began over 25 years ago. -,/ • ,moi . Sincerely, Jose Gelabert-Navia Principal,Perkins and Will 305.569.1333 jose.gelabert-navia@perkinswill.com s. •� F. Br' 'w :.^ 1. 'zw w . %.0 »,„. . .......... . _ .. 'ire-%-T.,...0,.* .iir ... ''.,, '''' It. '.184-4 i,4 41,..--.C11- 6 .. • ry ' � r1lA1. � sewY i . . E1.: ,N4 *y .`. * r" 4f�T174 ' „Q" ' _ lt ':-!-2-777 _ 1 ,�,F 1. ..vim : a � '< iR III k 1!171' : .n"} 1,t --- t- #,40-r ' ' ww .„- ' ~ war ■ ts va<,** s 1 Nper 7 --.:4,..: ice. ".'°, 7., 14 ..-. wow 7 g f .. `' -, 1'�.`•.ylrr .rz. '� ry+� a(- ��4 . r!t a :ate' ;.''.i if a j"!• ,, r f' r 30 s ... its " nab'` „l e v. v ti aypp ).JF „ r j . . 3 I' t . '" 1..s'^4 k egg Y., � t ,_ 4' t. rar " .* ". rft ^a`T9i1[t rss�-wrs a .-,r - € Rai ff us @@ k 1 Yc. � nr � st tf e" . 4. .� . a _,2:,,,,A0-!:?..., :r..9 .q i" Ari r .:... Contents TAB 1.0 1.1 Cover Letter — 05 1.2 Proposal Certification Form (Appendix A-1) — 08 1.3 Questionnaire& Requirements Affidavit (Appendix A-2) — 09 1.4 Minimum Qualifications Requirements — 12 TAB 2.0 2.1 Organizational Chart — 17 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm — 18 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team — 60 TAB 3.0 Approach and Methodology — 91 Left: 709 Alton Road, Miami Beach-designed by Perkins and Will Miami Beach project experience like this helps us to understand the local land development process and allows us to develop solutions specific to this opportunity. 2019 Winner -Platinum Award for Innovative Architecture Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce Better Beach Awards 7 Perkins&Will Proposal Certification Form APPENDIX Al - PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM This document is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM WITH ITS PROPOSAL SHALL RESULT IN THE PROPOSAL BEING DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2019-209-ND Resiliency Code Consultant Services Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000, Ext. 6263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov PROPOSER'S NAME: Perkins and Will NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: 84 23 2,400 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 2800 Ponce De Leon Blvd.,#1300 CITY: Coral Gables STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33134 TELEPHONE NO.: 305.569.1333 TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: 305.569.1334 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 2800 Ponce De Leon Blvd.,#1300 CITY: Coral Gables STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33134 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Jose Gelabert-Navia ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305.569.1333 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: jose.gelabert-navia@perkinswill.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 36-2679146 Except as stipulated in General Condition 36, Proposer agrees: to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all specifications, attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto; to be bound, at a minimum, to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained herein or Addenda; that the Proposer has not divulged, discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; that proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; that all responses, data and information contained in the proposal are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Jose Gelabert-Navia Principal Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: ` 07.15.19 8 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit APPENDIX A2-QUESTIONNAIRE AND REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT FORM The purpose of this Proposal Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposers of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,and to collect necessary information from Proposers in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated.Attach any requested information. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative. Jose Gelabert-Navia Principal Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: 07.15.19 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES X NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest. All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References& Past Performance. Proposer shall attach at least three(3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an sublic sector agency? YES © NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Department with its proposal/response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among others,the conflict of interest,lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall attach its Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at http://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/procurement/procurement-related-ordinance-and-procedures/ 9 Perkins&Will 2. Effective January 1,2019,covered employees must be paid a living wage rate of no loaf than$11.70 per hour with health awe(in a particular y ar). portal,LCP Tracker(LCPTrackcr.net). YES A19 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners. When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach, who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States,but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits,who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? X YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? X YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the"other"section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner,such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health X X Sick Leave X X Family Medical Leave X X Bereavement Leave X X If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis,you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application(attached) with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at http://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/procurement/orocurement-related-ordinance-and-procedures/ 10 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 9. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals, proposals,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided ins.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees to the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list.Failure to agree shall result in roposal disqualification. X YES NO 10. Non-Discrimination.Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990,the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code, including the blacklisting,divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race,color,national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code.Failure to agree shall result in proposal disqualification. X YES NO 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi.Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375,the City of Miami Beach,Florida,prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375.Failure to agree shall result in proposal disqualification. X YES NO 12 Fair Chance Requirement.Pursuant to Section 2-376 of the City Code,the City shall not enter into any contract resulting from a competitive solicitation,unless the proposer certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices, and standards that are consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in Article V of Chapter 62 of the City Code("Fair Chance Ordinance"),and which,among other things,(i)prohibits City contractors,as an employer,from inquiring about an applicant's criminal history until the applicant is given a conditional offer of employment;(ii)prohibits advertising of employment positions with a statement that an individual with a criminal record may not apply for the position, and (iii) prohibits placing a statement on an employment application that a person with a criminal record may not apply for the position. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:Proposer certifies that it has adopted policies,practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance. Proposer agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request. Proposer further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract,and shall entitle the City to the immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition to any damages that may be available at law and in equity.Failure to agree shall result in pro sal disqualification. YES NO 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt JGN Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 _ 11 Perkins&Will Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1. Project team (including prime consultant and sub-consultants) shall have a minimum of three (3) years of prior experience in each of the following areas: architecture, land use law, planning and urban design, landscape architecture, and sustainability and resiliency. Architecture Urban Design Project Experience Landscape Architecture Perkins and Will has been practicing Within this submission we have Sustainability architecture since 1935.The included a project portfolio that Resiliency Miami office was established in details each of the services requested 1996 and has been in continuous Urban Design,Landscape Architecture, by the minimum qualifications operation ever since. Sustainability and Resilience services requirement. Land Use Law are all performed by Perkins and Will. For each qualifying project we have Perkins and Will was founded in 1935. NancyStroud of Lewis.Stroud& included:project name,project The Miami office was established Deutsch,P.L.,has been practicinglaw description,start and completion in 1996 and has been in continuous for 30+years.Lewis,Stroud&Deutsch dates,project contact information operation ever since.All of the services was established in 2000 and has been (phone and email),volume of contract listed above have been and are in continuous operation ever since. currently being performed from the (confidential),prime proposer's principle role in project. Planning Miami office. Certification Ana Gelabert-Sanchez has over 25 Coastal systems has been providing years of experience in the planning engineering services for 20+years. I certify that each firm included field.She served as PlanningDirector in this submission meets the Michael Laas has been performing minimum requirements outlined in for the City of Miami from 1998-2010. community engagement services Ana will be joined byPerkins and Will's RFQ 2019-209-ND J with Sustainable Futures Group for in-house planning team.With over 100 three years. staff,the firm was awarded the 2015 National Planning Excellence Award by the AICP.PlusUrbia was formed over 15 years ago. 12 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Ire , ttf� — `4: K.. _ e ,! LSr ! �' ,� �' ' 7, 1 "., ' ' „ 0 AO -I''''' , ' ' ' CtikS I:7re" 4',.„ iit t „Xit \''',.;,:,,„_:40) ._ " ' A, ifti4 ,� .., _i ,,,rit......t.„.,. '.:,1,::,."* .e7"' ' ' -- • � � 4' a . .. r i V `•*`A t Coconut Grove BID Village Core Master Plan The Miami Office of Perkins and Will Perkins and Will's Miami office is an award-winning and internationally recognized practice that delivers transformational design services throughout Florida and around the world. I '' With a multi-lingual,multi-cultural,international staff, it is one of the row firm's most diverse offices,and proudly maintains client relationships that a ` transcend geographic,cultural,and linguistic borders.The Miami practice I ' is a leader in design across a diverse group of building types,and has a " .; / fit strong commitment to the community and the environment,designing ,, i t high-performance buildings,communities and environments that foster the wellbeing of people and the planet. is K ti r f i� v . Ron DeSantis,Wvemor Ha,nv Besnears Secrebry -: ft; f'l, ° Y EIdi3:sr 'kr v ' f STATE OF FLORIDA 1 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN THE ARCHITECT CORPORATION HEREIN IS CERTIFIED UNDER THE 1212 Lincoln Road,Miami Beach PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 481,FLORIDA STATUTES PERKINS&WILL ARCHITECTS INC 2 BRYANT STREET,SUITE 300 ATTN:R.NEMETH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 t LICENSE NUMBER:AAC000180 EXPIRATION DATE:FEBRUARY 28,2021 I Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.cam Nv : Do not alter this document in any form. � M ..unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document i Or.�r. This is your license.It Is u 13 Perkins&Will Page Intentionally Left Blank 14 Perkins&Will TAB 02. Experience & Qualifications Perkins&Will Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 2.1 Organizational Chart �w The City of Miami --,,, Beach Public Stakeholeders Jose Gelabert-Navia 1 . Kricket Snow V IManaging Principal Project Manager Perkins and Will Perkins and Will 1 I I Design and Resilience Community Outreach and Implementation in Paul Kulig „' Ana M.Gelabert-Sanchez Urban Design Principal Planning Principal ''` r Perkins and Will Gelabert-Sanchez, LLC Leo Alvarez Juan Mullerat ”` 6 Landscape Architecture Principal Form-Based Code Lead * Perkins and Will J PlusUrbia Doug PierceMichael Laas iii Resilience Expert c Community Engagement Perkins and Will •4' Sustainable Futures Group Pat Bosch i' Nancy Stroud Architecture Principal Land Use Attorney AKPerkins and Will Lewis,Stroud& Deutsch, P.L. diRebecca Ramsey Planner Perkins and Will J Clara Romero . Urban Designer I Perkins and Will f-84 Megan McLaughlin Historic Preservation PlusUrbia Civil/Coastal Engineering Coastal Systems International Mobility Consulting Nelson Nygaard/Perkins and Will 17 Perkins&Will 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team We have assembled a team with a deep understanding of the requirements to make this a success for project the City of Miami Beach . Community building opportunities like this are at the heart of who we are and what we do. Perkins&Will has been in Miami for 23 years. We understand the local climate challenges and are eager to help to create a form based code solution for the City of Miami Beach. 18 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Planning, Resilience & Experience in Implementation We have selected a team of experts well versed in We have included Ana Gelabert-Sanchez for the successful implementation of citywide form- planning services and Nancy Stroud for Land based codes, incorporating the latest and most Use legal services. Ana previously led the City innovative thought leadership in sustainability of Miami's Planning Department and was and resiliency standards and components. responsible for the successful implementation of Perkins and Will is the leader in Sustainable Miami2l. Ms. Stroud was the principal legal team design. In 2014 we developed RELi, in conjunction member,working with the City of Miami staff, with the Institute for Market Transformation to in the creation of the revised citywide zoning Sustainability(MTS). RELi is a public standard that code for Miami2l. Additionally, we have included prescribes methods for designing more resilient PlusUrbia as Form-Based Code consultants. buildings, neighborhoods, homes, infrastructure, PlusUrbia are experts in the implementation of and communities. In 2017,the USGBC and CBCI local Form Based Codes. adopted the RELi resilience standard to offer Perkins and Will has also served as Strategy greater adaptability and resilience to communities Partner for 100 Resilient Cities - developing after weather and natural disasters. Resilience Strategies for Toronto, Minneapolis and Louisville - a process that can dovetail directly with Miami Beach's Resilience Strategy and Form- based Code work. 1111114441 \ Clockwise from Left: ,c,,,°. -1 Community Engagement session for the Little - Havana planning project. ._ Hialeah Master Plan and Transit { - - es. Oriented Development f. Z4 .j rt y f . 41,10 rv 4. It r �g sh "uWA a '�.. +, ' .' '.'11-.',7-' ' ' ' Alit ...w'''',':. - '''',**'*':.::::,,,- ' . '' ',Or. ' :411.-A ., '. '''' 4.j , ...,, ,..,..., .„, - if„.f, _ , e 1 t ..NI) ' '...-',-7. ."-..., I it....,5-„:„j, tric.•, C .-- . f Yom, i $'_ . ' . . like . . � ' r / � , Perkins&Will 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team Since 1935, we've believed that design has the power to make the world a better, more beautiful place. Areas of Practice That's why clients and communities on nearly every Branded Environments continent partner with us to design healthy, happy Civic and Cultural places in which to live, learn, work, play, and heal. We're passionate about human-centered design, and Corporate and Commercial committed to creating a positive impact in people's lives Corporate Interiors through sustainability, resilience, well-being, diversity, Health inclusion, and research. In fact, Fast Company named Higher Education us one of the World's Most Innovative Companies in Hospitality Architecture. Our global team of 2,700 creatives and K-12 Education critical thinkers provides worldwide interdisciplinary Landscape Architecture services in architecture, interior design, landscape Planning and Strategies architecture, and more. Our partners are Schmidt Science and Technology Hammer Lassen, Portland, Nelson\Nygaard, Genesis Sports, Recreation,and Planning, and Pierre-Yves Rochon (PYR). Entertainment Transportation Urban Design 20 Fr- , ri , . .;* , , r , . ,, 1 , cj w 'err �,. " yy ➢ 1 �+ :'.z\ I c li 1 I r ' r II 1, __ , . .. , _ ,... , ,, , .., 1 III ,., ,.. ,.... i11 1-,... I _ ;:,:,„e.,:::,`.-..1'*,,,, �to J *sY;:: ,�- x a k 1212 Lincoln Road . zt 2 A r ' * I '. 1 i` % Miami Beach -.- ,E r4 .' Currently in Construction ' -Id PUBLIC AND PERSONAL SAFETY `� ` HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC DESIGN HEALTH POWER OF PHYSICAL PLACE TO INFLUENCE HUMAN SCALE CREATIVITY+ PEOPLE AND THEIR PLANNING AND POWER OF:. CULTURE CAPTIAL DESIGN MIXED-U CHECKED e GROWTH THE EQUITY AND ENERGY BETWEEN GRANULAR AFFORDABILITY DENSITY AND CITY DIVERSITY BALANCE SELF BETWEEN ORGANIZATION PLANNED:Hill UNPLANND E. TOcore Building for Liveability Toronto 21 Perkins&Will Planning and Urban Design Creating Vibrant, Sustainable Environments At the global scale, we take pride in our projects' potential for positive change. At the human scale, we understand how the character and texture of the public realm influences the quality of daily life. Everything we do in our practice revolves around the idea that our work should result in great places, from the smallest detail to the broadest planning platform. s �* Framing Places Cities are changing rapidly,but there's nothing new about smart cities."In many ways,the Romans built smart cities,as did Haussman and Oglethorpe.As we confront the critical issues of twenty-first century urban living,how do we,as designers,incorporate new advances in technology and data wool into the creative process of making great places?Whereas xeconomics has driven the form of cities of past centuries,in ,..a ; • ; recent decades proactive zoning and regulations have vastly improved the living conditions and the environmental impact . s ir_. of intense urbanism. As the world concentrates economically and culturally in urban '{! # settlements,the environmental performance of cities and their w m` 'r civic spaces is an opportunity for innovation in the service of a liveable planet.We are tackling the trend of urban population V, growth by embracing density and prioritizing diversity, equality,and civic life while creating solutions for the effects �.,^ .. of climate change and sea-level rise.Our success stories show that the low-carbon city of the future is also a vibrant, creative,and comfortable place to live and work. 22 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team Our work enhances the best qualities of urban living to shape distinctive and magnetic places. Areas of Expertise Transforming The Waterfront Urban Designrban Planning Waterfront transformation is part of the global movement to rethink and Architecture revitalize former industrial and brownfield sites into places for recreation, entertainment,working,and living. Perkins and Will is playing a leading Landscape Architecture role in creating and realizing these new and renewed areas—from Adaptive Reuse master plans for waterfront districts to designing new developments and Applied Research attractions that celebrate the water's edge. Computational Design Major waterfront locations demand more than a talent for design:they require extensive expertise in the entitlements process and experience Sustainable Design with public/private partnerships.Because we recognize the importance Resilience of working waterfront locations and the continued industrial and Public Health commercial use of our waterways,many of our plans integrate these uses into the urban fabric in a harmonious way,maintaining the excitement, Social Equity activity,and economic lifeblood of working waterfronts. Public Realm&Green Streets By bringing the diversity of the city right to the water's edge,the Stakeholder Engagement waterfront can be the community's meeting place,a center for arts and entertainment,and a focal point for celebration and inspiration. Bottom: Mary Brickell Village Urban Improvements 441‘ II r4- � Y 1 14* 1 1 xy v ---'' ,. lTM $ y I � 4 _...._,_ _,,,„.0,,,...„, !,,...r„ ,L.i.ir ,„, ,•!-- yt :l r 'per ) 47y cei .s.. -rte 23 Perkins&Will 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team Our transformative designs help city dwellers have more meaningful daily experiences. Advancing Sustainability Reviving Public Spaces Defining Excellence As designers and planners, When people engage with public Perkins and Will was founded on sustainability guides every aspect of spaces,they do more than support the belief that design has the power our practice.With a vision that moves the economy—they build a sense to transform lives-for our clients, beyond simply reducing environmental of belonging.We believe the public our culture and our communities. impact,sustainable design seeks realm is critical to jumpstart economic Our definition of design excellence to realign the relationship between growth,boost quality of life,and involves a holistic view of our clients' humans and nature. From projects that set the stage for civic engagement. vision,needs and context.By adding make the public realm greener—parks, Our plans and designs are focused creativity and innovation,our work greenways,and streetscapes—to on creating new public spaces in addresses complex problems.We large-scale systems for sustainability forgotten and disconnected corners transform our clients'businesses managed districts,we deliver resource of the built environment.Immersed and missions,helping to make them strategies for the next generation of in the settings of our clients,we leaders in their fields. urban dwellers. transform cities,waterfronts,city This approach is supported by bi- centers,educational and corporate As a practice,we believe sustainability weekly local design reviews and campuses,and urban districts into includes not only environmental across the firm through institutions vibrant,sustainable communities. outcomes but also health,community like the Design Leadership Council, What happens when abandoned well-being,and economic outcomes. and a Biennale.By pairing railroads,industrialized riverfronts, Therefore we strive to integrate international design leadership with grid locked freeways,and channelized resiliency measures into every facet of local design teams we are able to waterways—which historically created planning.With recent environmental deliver innovative solutions to our blight and barriers—are transformed catastrophes and social stressors in clients'needs. into new civic spaces?By repurposing mind,Perkins and Will is focused on developing better protections for these lost assets,cities can shape people,properties,and communities, greenspaces and transit connections even as we reduce the amount of that generate value and improve natural resources expended in our quality of life.Such investments do more than provoke change in the daily lives. city's form:they reconnect us with our history and redefine our way of life.Catalyst infrastructure changes the way we think about the places where we live. 24 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services { e -,„14:441„, it r - ••v.. asap - , t *'*4- l''''' ;','". ;1:1.-al .7 Ali N4r *1 r =. It 1 SI * . • , Are if .. .. Lit '.„.,.; � i; y „ ,„,,,.._ ..„.,:, #. ' r , , r i '''' 4 4 . ' ' t I.':Ai :4'. ,I : ' ' 444 n 4 3 Mobility Planning Perkins and Will/Nelson Nygaard Partnership More and more,mobility and accessibility are becoming important drivers in the design of our increasingly urbanized world.The future success of our cities will depend on people being able to move swiftly,smoothly,and efficiently through any number of environments at any given time.This strategic partnership enables Nelson\ Nygaard and Perkins and Will to expand and diversify their worldwide mobility service offerings,providing a comprehensive package that includes everything from strategic master planning for cities and sites to architectural,interior,urban,and landscape design. Background Information Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates,Inc.is an internationally recognized firm committed to developing transportation systems that promote vibrant,sustainable,and accessible communities.Founded by two women in 1987,Nelson\Nygaard has grown from its roots in transit planning to a 123-person,full-service transportation firm with offices across the United States. In keeping with the values set by our founders,Nelson\Nygaard puts people first.We recognize that transportation is not an end by itself but a platform for achieving broader goals such as sustainability,accessibility,mobility,and healthy living.Our handson, national experience informs but doesn't dictate local solutions. Built on consensus and a multimodal approach,our plans are renowned as practical and implementable. Recognized for projects around the world,Nelson\Nygaard has received awards and honors from professional organizations and government agencies including the American Planning Association,the Federal Transit Administration,the Association of Environmental Professionals,the American Society of Landscape Architects,the Congress for the New Urbanism, and the Canadian Institute of Planners. 25 Perkins&Will 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team Our Commitment to Resilience. 2014 Resilience Lab 2014 Released RELi 2015 Three Questions We are partnering with clients <pronounced rely> combines We ask three questions of every to identify vulnerabilities a comprehensive list of project in order to understand to natural and manmade resilient design criteria with a the potential threats to stressors in buildings, cities proven integrative process for that project location and its and our communities, and developing next generation intended occupants and to to create design responses communities, buildings, determine the vulnerabilities to help achieve stability and homes and infrastructure. that the project has to those adaptability.We are working The Credit Catalog includes threats.We then design to to help restructure the social, new resilience-based actions address those issues. economic, and physical capital (requisites + credits) pioneered necessary to create buildings, for RELi in 2014. cities, and communities that are more diverse, more resilient, and more vital than in the past. 26 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services ST 4, j7 4,14 4,es 9F 6.4,4-.' '.:44"'‘ -,-1-13N voo c, • CLIMATE o ADAPTATION QUESTIONS pt.. ,t, --,- ,\ ,� ,, iv N. �1; S.�j �' i , . 1.48b83NinA ".'d, di;',1„,„„,,,,,,i- 2017 „'gra2017 #wearestillin Resilience Lab Goals 1. What are the climate projections in your project We are part of a sweeping • Strengthen building, location? national coalition of infrastructure, organization communities, cities, states, and community resistance to 2. What are its vulnerabilities NGOs, universities, and chronic stressors arising from and cascading corporations that are working a changing climate and consequences as a result of together to drive climate action resource depletion those projections? in the United States.These • Improve safety and stability 3. How does your design intrepid, progressive entities during acute shocks from solution address those have committed to accelerating both manmade events and vulnerabilities? the rate of emissions reduction natural phenomena in the U.S. to the point where we meet our contributions under • Reduce physical risks posed the Paris Agreement. This is why by extreme weather events we are signatories of the Low to communities Carbon USA pact and We Are • Reduce risk premiums Still In, and why Perkins&Will has associated with operations, also signed the AIA Committee insurance and financing on the Environment's recent • Maintain continuity of letters to the U.S. Secretary of business and community Energy and to the Administrator activities during chronic and of the U.S. EPA, both of which acute events Perkins&Will helped to draft. 27 Perkins&Will 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team Resilience works in terms of nested scales. From the individual choices that each of us makes to the way in which we rely on and contribute to our communities. Individual(I)Individuals determine City Cities lead in resilience strategies, personal resilience strategies and finding ways to leverage local,state understand how choices relate to and federal funds to gain greater the resources provided by others. traction and to provide co-benefits Examples include personal go-kits and so that investments work harder preparedness plans for maintaining for citizens,reducing risks while Our Commitment health and work connections during improving livelihoods.We and our disruptions. community should understand those to Resilience strategies and how they relate to our We Families,or Teams,or Companies own planning. develop their own approaches to Scales of Influence investing in and collaborating on Region Larger scale planning across overall resilience.Examples include regions seeks to link up investments business continuity plans that for greater value and works at systems organizations develop to reduce scales to ingrain resilience.Examples impacts from events or readiness plans include watershed strategies to that families create to enable calmer manage and maintain water quality responses in adversity. as well as regional plans that address Community Community Preparedness system dependencies such as transport routes and service flows. Planning continues to grow in relevance as we see events unfolding. Knowing what your community can do,and is prepared to do, is central to your own resilience.Examples include a research community that has redundancy plans to assure sample stability with power outages or a community center that is set up as a shelter for evacuees. 28 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Country Drawing together multiple regional and city plans, The point is the connections between the systems are countrywide resilience depends on the strategic connections nested, not independent.The choices that an organization between planning decisions. Examples include the Dutch makes impacts its people and their families,the community polder systems and climate mitigation plans tied to the of which it is a part,the city and country that holds that Paris Agreement. community and ultimately the planet that we occupy. Planet Each country contributes to,or draws down, Resilience Across Scale and in Concert the resilience of our larger collective home.Seeing the connections between development in India and the with Other Research Labs deforestation in Brazil or understanding the Stockholm Resilience Institute's perspective on Planetary Boundaries Perkins&Will links resilient design to our work with energy, are examples. water,the human experience and our many other research labs.We see the relationships between these efforts as contributing to the greater good,across scales and across disciplinary boundaries. �A� E,seI.Ot.. E MRB1tit? ,. .,,,,..,,;.4..:,::::,,,,,:1:1 4ti".''t,. '15,`',?"'''..'';:Zit.'7:14.44:',‘,,,,,, f �j - 1 �N IT/1 a ' '" " \ 1,1 i t:,/17 'qr. :!,:',..=;,1:.:-:4 -, ee qO tt\ p 1r t a" `S�. v % % z• lit ' '� ¢1 r,at �' �9`aye" , , a'c".."".'..'A,.",4". r.—°.."..-"— _„�.,,...—" may. CITY REGION .: �� COUNTRY p'C�` Fy�9 _ F C` I • PLANET �t�`P�Q Ma RESILIENCE 29 Perkins&Will 2.1 Qualifications of Proposer Team A global perspective with Regional Understanding Our team understands the vulnerabilities to natural and man-made shocks and stressors in buildings,cities,and their communities,and designs responses to them to help achieve stability and adaptability.Our network of engaged professionals across the world offers knowledge base of the context and issues affecting our clients locally. BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION (COASTAL/ LEVEL RISE • ..•' MASTER BROAD AND • 4ORDABLE LANNINGINCLUSIVE OUSING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ' • LANDSCAPE FOR EMERGENCY BIODIVERSE AND • COMMAND DROUGHT TOLERANT STRATEGIES • PLANTINGS HEALT� • DISTRICT CLIMATE PLANNING • MITIGATION AND .• • ADAPTATION ••SURVIVABILITY • SCENARIO STRATEGIES DEVELOPMENT ... j HABITAT CONNECTIVITY i \\,,,_ ••••••••••••• ....t.. .• •�GREEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ..... INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINABLE RISK _____") DESIGN ASSESSMENT 30 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 50+ RELi Accredited Professionals . {the world's first) Our Success Stories 1,000+ RELi Resiliency Standard LEED Accredited Professionals Firm of the Year Winner of USGBC's inaugura design firm awarf� ire-,ivAn r , ` research Reference Brief sly [z':,,,L,,,,,,, 7.411 I l , j � " wy x.. s" rf n > I .e r+ft wnfnl6f tuc 3d a wt. �� '1.. a k o ..e affix, jkle+eY Frear i F _..t 44 I ` I } �. 1 Perkins and Will is an interdisciplinary practice bringing an In 2017,under the leadership of Doug Pierce,the USGBC unparalleled level of research and depth of bench resources and CBCI adopted the RELi resilience standard to offer to this opportunity.We are pushing the boundaries of greater adaptability and resilience to communities after resilience design across the globe and here locally in Florida. weather and natural disasters. We practice what we preach-in 2014 we developed,in conjunction with the Institute for Market Transformation to Sustainability(MTS), RELi. RELi is a public standard that prescribes methods for designing more resilient buildings, I , neighborhoods,homes,infrastructure,and communities. 31 Perkins&Will TOcore Building for Liveability Study Toronto, Ontario Client:City of Toronto Years of Engagement:2017-2018 Reference: Shawna Bowen,Project Manager,Urban Design, City of Toronto, 416.392.2489 Showna.Bowen@toronto.ca Project experience by the firm h "t * , • � a. t� `sLq� 6 r Y Z-"71,..„, Build for Liveability s "y tHiitti The"Build for Liveability"study is informed by innovative testing of built form performance standards for Downtown ,1 -- L 1` - ;g G $ g {11 and inspired by the City's existing practices and standards, x � as well as other cities'planning frameworks.The framework builds on Toronto's distinct characteristics and make this a R rfairtrh t• . rt5 i "made in Toronto,for Toronto"vision for liveability of the built ? _.$' environment. s4 11,‘4...!,,t r ' .,Y nsau•6 sf, Downtown requires an updated planning framework to ensure that it is sustainable,liveable and inclusive;wellconnected, vibrant and authentic,for the benefit of all Torontonians for Toronto is recognized the world over as a generations to come. liveable city and a global centre of talent, culture,diversity and vibrancy.This is particularly true of Downtown where liveability has been a magnet for growth.However,in the face of rapid growth,intensification,and PUBLIC ANO increasingly taller buildings,The"Building PERSONAL SAFETY for Liveability"study has been undertaken I PUBLIC concurrently with the development of the HEALTH Downtown Plan and its recommendations CronYHT` served to inform the policies proposed in the Downtown Plan. CHECKED I _ GROWTH Above:'Heatmap'showing access to sunlight on public spaces in the Downtown was used to analyze and recommend policies and codes for public parks. BALANCE SELF- BETWEEN Left:Toronto's'DNA'was identified at the ORGANIZATION PLANNED AND outset of the study and used to refine UNPLANNED approaches to liveability and development in Downtown. Perkins&Will Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services ToCore Building for Liveability Study Building for Liveability 1,1111(/1.WILL Obi= TOcore The Building for Liveability study analyzes the importance of five principles-comfort,vibrancy,diversity,safety and beauty-through the BUILDING FOR LIVEABILITY following elements of liveability: access to sunlight in open spaces access to sunlight in streets t„ • pedestrian level wind , .'-,''r",-.1i t'' :^V - ::-',.4‘,....; :tikg, Agi, • daylighting for indoor spaces �.; t N Iy ..41 • privacy T r . s , 3 � :4 �fi • connectivity V. 011 ''"" _ , interface with public realm transition a.- • sky views Above:recommendations from the Study were • summarized in a graphically rich,easy to read report skyline found here:https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/ • mixed use&flexible building design uploads/2018/04/968x-city-planning-tocore-blg-for- livability-f.pdf • heritage Right:Perkins and Will employed a variety of computational tools to test and analyze the impacts of new development on the surrounding public realm. SOLAR PROTECTION RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH TESTING STEPS: - ..1 Form-base Code+Resilience • (1-‘\ 1 �' unshadowed areas F are defined solar analyses ¢—{ for forst hour 1 � Land Development Regulations • F� ,,.... Guidelines for Historic Districts • Iiii... ..A ,,,, Codifying Community Design • Urban Condition Landscaping • Regulations several solar cones unshadowed merged to create a areas extruded no-build zone for no-build zone for a no-build zone for Building Community Consensus • into solar cones one how range of time first hour Strong Graphic Skills • \• 7iif-build zone for Streamlining Land aecorrdnow : Development Processes Perkins&Will ToCore Building for Liveability Study RICHMOND ST LOOKING EAST(FROM JARVIS ST) 0 . , . 40 B: RICHMOND ST LOOKING WEST(FROM POWER ST) 0 < 6t4 < > 9M rr ! / ! The study involved three key areas: N o., yy��1 tl R9 Er,d t++tr WItl ti.,7,:,NS25L sp p5m f•6 20m RCW 20VOW Iim RGN 27.^..ROY+ • Research on innovative practices LW EW NS fW kS FW NS and policies occurring in other cities, „- _ and how we tap on the extensiveit _ SH . A Perkins&Will network of experts to put _.�_..° Toronto in context �M , � 'A''' A x'Y w f x • • Heavy parametric modelling around �~ microclimate recommendations to ensure that the impacts were being evaluated at 4r) ''\a -,' s r . ' # # city-wide scale - Strategic formulation of built form recommendations to easily integrate within -.. — the Toronto-specific planning framework. tall 3 tall I i tall 1 ? 1 . 1 parks, i 1 i 7 E streets E E F -1 Top:shadow impacts of new development i, F I .1_ , i were tested during different seasons and informed the final code.Middle:Optional tall, tall Caption,1-2 sentences max. I 1 e I 1 Middle:rapid modeling of recommended s t a ir E codes allowed for review by the public t 7 t ! mad— E • t J and city staff. r � t tit,m._..._• low .low Perkins&Will Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services ToCore Building for Liveability Study the work was organized around 10 Elements of Liveability allowing for consistent communication with stakeholders and the public. ELEMENTS OF 14 0 ',ems to S°"'rr°"`iw5p LIVEABILITY ` 9 E'�a i''�_� �:"`�` PRINCIPLESTHERMAL F t . FOR DAYLIGHTING .FOR INDOOR . ........ .......... . SPACES COMFORT PRIVACY VIBRANCY ;I 1. CONNECTIVITY . � INTERFAC' i1/4 .. NRH PUBLK ., OIVERSI I't REALM .. . , , . . . .. . ..,. r . ., . . OS 9 B 07 t SKY-PIENS SAFETY oe BEAUTY,y. MIXED US . t FLEXIBLE BUILDING DESIGN 4,10 —WHAT IT IS A framework for delivering on liveability outcomes - comfort, vibrancy, diversity, safety and beauty - within Downtown. Perkins&Will Atlanta Beltline Corridor Design & Eastside Trail Atlanta, Georgia Client:Atlanta Beltline,Inc. Designing a signature public meeting ground that creates Size:22 Miles new connections between Atlanta's urban neighborhoods. Years of Engagement:2005-2010 Client Reference: Built on a loop of reclaimed railroad tracks,the Atlanta Kevin W.Burke,AOLCP,PLA,ASLA BeltLine is a 22-mile multi-modal corridor consisting of transit, Senior Landscape Architect a linear greenway,and multi-use trails.This groundbreaking Atlanta BeltLine,Inc. public infrastructure effort connects 45 historic neighborhoods 100 Peachtree St NW#2300 around the city's urban core,catalyzing economic Atlanta,GA 30303 development as it circles the city.Atlanta BeltLine,Inc.hired 404.477.3637 our team as the lead designer and manager for their Corridor Project experience by the firm Design,which provides a strategic framework to realize a functional,cohesive,and elegant urban design over time. The Corridor Design highlights the character of the diverse landscapes through which the Atlanta BeltLine travels, creating an episodic experience in harmony with the urban fabric of the city.At the same time,it reinforces continuity The Corridor Design ensures that the grand and identity for the entire project by establishing a family of vision for the Atlanta BeltLine is sustainable, infrastructure elements,like bridges,walls,and railings,as well efficient,and affordable to build and operate. as strategies to incorporate public art and signage. . ', <� ' S- ,4 - Struk, s '"„ r a. ',-," L"+ate.. -"S•,... •: 1. .p'1.•.'. . 4.Ze',.. } a j! F :,---1...-.(04- ., ' c7,,mow 1 '�r e w.+. .. r"` '`h't r$t x: fi.� d`y, ` r 4 ' `' ,:- '`' "-.. ,. Ale 36 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Atlanta Beltline ,R,. - i • 14 . vi-Y ;.- :. >+ s -�-:.t, . iii - �1 ; ''7"1:,'...!•.••''''''''- - '''..''''' ..i_c 5;4'2, -'''''''',-..,...X' a. , '- 1 -' &ire 114, t , �i 99 # i►.. r l .'.y, :.. 'fit`" :;,y0., Zli , t - . / .r �a r _ x . . .t r i O$i.' "" • 4r,; . ' .rr - . .*tO°•*,Cr :''. '''.. ' .4 ''Argrit.,„-". •0 ',:'"••17; ''. j•-•- ,•-,"i :1' ''' '', '''''',...:,=zi ki...4"'' ''',,,,Ip.. 4 fir f' ,t-....�! rt \ ,, '.,A, r i 'f 1' + f2 E •Cit ingtot _ , b Celebrated as a national model for sustainable urban growth,the Atlanta BeltLine transforms a 22-mile industrial railroad corridor into a vibrant public greenway.When complete,this linear park will form a continuous circle,uniting over 45 diverse neighborhoods with a multi-use trail and light rail transit.The design of the Eastside Trail,the first completed section of the BeltLine,brings this massive project to life.At 2.2 miles, it represents only 10 percent of the entire project geographically,but contains half of the main program elements.This critical segment debuts and tests the design of the BeltLine,providing a framework that will organize the entire corridor-functionally,ecologically and aesthetically. RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH The Eastside Trail is a living design manual for the entire BeltLine.It Resilience+Sustainability introduces the organizing strategy,"22 miles of continuitythrough 22 • 9 9 9 Standards miles of variety."Design elements inspired by the corridor's historic Codifying Community Design • railroad identity create continuity while the ever-changing landscape provides variety. Urban Condition Landscaping • Regulations Building Community Consensus • Strong Graphic Skills • 37 Perkins&Will Atlanta Beltline This repetition throughout the system mimics the rhythm of the railroad as it travels through a series of episodic"character A "`'' fr'y • _, „ , , rooms"that capture the diversity of each neighborhood.These , .,;,A,.,, . �r < } zones are defined by their own unique landforms,cultural • -t::- . : 4 ' '. histories,and vegetative palettes.The design team,through {{` s a ,� = T. *'" nr + , collaboration with the client,stakeholders,government 1 officials,and the general public,has created a civic space for { � ,' x a! _} all to enjoy-and one that is unique to Atlanta. '9a � � a��' � 4 'Rq ` 'i• :.,',':1'14.4 '''''''•- if The Eastside Trail was selected to be the first constructed f : I. ...ale. '- {tt segment of the Atlanta BeltLine because of the development ,, u , density in the surrounding neighborhoods and the open space ,. ',. '1,;:,.".:,.:,,, ' 1/ ? "� - 1`r '" resources along its route.Spatially,it consists of six"character '$ •.+v .-,.;,„'„It,.'''.• , §, F - 't. ' rooms"that connect five in-town Atlanta neighborhoods and ' three major urban open spaces: Piedmont Park,the Historic --'^ .'", • '--- . ' ;"i'• Fourth Ward Park and Freedom Parkway. For the hundreds of -- --�'j i' thousands of users who have strolled,skated,run,commuted, --.."'fi it' 'It,11' , '' ;i " ( 1 .•'► _ and paraded down the Eastside Trail this year,this is an -`', t ;'$,6 s _ . exciting introduction of what's to come. iii 4 ° k t e " r • Vit; r� ! � ," >.Q v` *, _ -vi,st.;:it, . - , .,. . - ' . ' •, - '. ,-,.1, , -,,- . N exit I , f • 38 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Atlanta Beltline p 11111116 The trail sets the stage for urban living by providing a flexible venue that will evolve with the community over time.Both s an intuitive urban interface and an exciting destination in itself,the Eastside Trail encourages Atlantans to experience this part of the city outside of their cars for the first time. The reception has been resounding: runners,walkers and ^* cyclists on the trail now average greater than 3,000 on + weekdays and greater than 10,000 on Saturdays and Sundays. y, Abutting neighborhood businesses and restaurants are reorienting themselves toward the trail to take advantage " - j. P of the heavy foot traffic. And the trail has become a premier ' fitness destination,inspiring Atlanta's first and only in-town , running series. .� The impact on development has been equally significant. p.iiit.: . Vitli Since 2005,more than 50 projects representing more than ..x may` $2.4 billion in private investment have taken shape around ' `, 0 the Atlanta BeltLine,with$638 million in new development k along the Eastside Trail alone. This massive private investment is also yielding an altogether different type of development .'a. i „ :, rh... for Atlanta: dense,urban,pedestrian-focused and lifestyle- T ' centered. The result is literally changing the way people think i 4( about Atlanta. 1A.'''� ''',.':,....c...1,,f,,.:, ,11‘, _, : i 4K s N Cep >” ' - i : .' It's transforming not ,:. " only the physical city, at C- lit ' : 11 it. it's changing the way � . - : „,f , people think about living in Atlanta. �t µ 6 i J"' ., dew, r"; , 39 Perkins&Will Yonge-Eglinton Built Form Study and Davisville Public Realm Toronto, Ontario Comprehensive Built Form Recommendations Located at the intersection of the Yonge subway line and Client:City of Toronto proposed Eglinton Crosstown LRT,Yonge-Eglinton is the fastest Size:600 hectares growing and most successful Urban Growth Centre in Toronto. Years of Engagement:2017-2019 References: The area developed as a high-density node in the 1960s in Ann-Marie Nasr MCIP RPP,Manager,Strategic the wake of the Yonge Street subway,but has experienced Initiatives at City of Toronto City Planning Division, a second round of intensification over the last 15 years The 416.392.3078 area's population has grown by 73%since 1991,and there are anasr@toronto.ca currently over 30 active development applications for high- Project experience by the firm rise towers(5 of which are 40+stories).The introduction of the Crosstown LRT will further accelerate these growth trends. The existing built form includes a diverse mix of post-war tower-in-the-park apartments,mid-century mid-rise apartments and more recent tower+podium building types, surrounded by a tight grid of single family homes and ravines. A series of extant 2-story retail strips criss-cross the area. This study developed a comprehensive series of built form New green streets along Davisville Avenue recommendations for a diverse mix of character areas improved walkability and served to reduce including:Apartment Nieghbourhoods,Mid-rise Main Streets, stormwater run-off Yt t, i; ti }; .4.,,,,,,:`-"4k '! E r S" k t K s A. --„,„.. . .. . , . ,_ 2, 4 „4,4tt{ .....,:t:001.,;--:, ..,..•• " i acea � Y y L i 414- Alrt ^., gam - & y r kr \� f ,fir .,, ,� ' 0°I J• ,,,,"� . - , - �^ )`t ! fir 't .� „0." xY c 40 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Yonge-Eglinton Built Form Study .\w` : \ Nx \ ° e'11 \k 4 \ J 9- 1- \\)k,3,0 •:. Transit Nodes and series of hybrid conditions that transition to !i p ,: ;:' '. V ,;'Z' .,..' . mature neighbourhoods. -. ,, " �, •4 Perkins&Will developed a proprietary software plug-in that -g '� w J P P P Y P 9 *i �. ' . - allowed for real-time manipulation of built form scenarios �#t �3y'No ' r� that built off of the City's typical mid-rise and tall building _ = r guidelines.These were tested against a series of built form li t Sr r .1 T ) 1, - metrics established as part of a comprehensive vision for each area and evaluated using our in-house sun-shadow analysis �?�t -��,,t t-.• ill z tool,micro-climate conditions,transit access,and relationship 1 ?° al to the previously approved public realm study. I! ' ` Rs a" ' w- t r ' g .: -- = t Together,these built form recommendations fed into � �,- .e.. � �gi��g1�I� r. ,,,�.� . � ',. Secondary Plan policies and by-laws that will withstand 1'� . scrutiny from the Ontario Municipal Board.This is being done . ( fie ems" �� e { while the City continues to receive,review and approve new i,,111 w , - . , i 11.\ development applications. ... 414 ,. .t.'-' lr As part of this work,Perkins&Will also developed an series R � t of cross-sections,illustrated plans and renderings for the t5 , . • Davisville Public Realm Study. i "' '�-e*7` f . �fx ' 'l �� tl a y2 fir / i Jf �_ ,y- . t- ."./.,/,--.,---,' T y ,�-. �, / 7 r � f l • e,-7/ 1 . J / '..^ / � / 7 . r f tr;,ik . j�,✓"s 1 i r / r r - ` ,•r F I f f. ,l ;. ,f/„%er 7'.: ,,,,k;;-: f ., _t. .�. i '/• '' /• �� Top:the Eglinton Greenline will provide `,„44,,,,'a 't `” ` J,, t/ i a new,continuous 45 foot deep public 4 fl walkway connecting the neighborhoods ; �, _ E,, j,�;. 7 '� } - major retail and commercial ,.i.,,, „..,,,.:. „:... .. ,.,ii 4 17‘Y",,,,'44.,../. ,. i { ��•• a ; � ' „ ,�- G t r destinations. ax � • E- , -1- as 1-1 x t a ,, .,.,' -, „,,,,,,,.--.0-,--4,,,,-,, � ✓ ),,_ ,', ”' r Left:Existing,proposed and approved �'-,r y� • �! ''"A •,' �" a ,_`r development applications were tracked, ' "C,* " ".` _' , '., ` , ' _ 'mak -, . live,throughout the course of the Study. 41 Perkins&Will Yonge-Eglinton Built Form Study 'r`i-A -,-i' 'Iii' <. . '''. , , .,;:' ';, -,,.r',,,,,,,.:,;,- ,-„ ,, . "k k ''.'"?1,----;-',.:...,.-3, ate°,. f - 44,,,,:,, }[i �i i t„ vt.' .1------- - I ' l''':iii .0 -" 1 i ''''' '44 ,. ""*"4 9 1 • ' v i p <---i,..,...'-''--4:3....,.:1 - ': R sl ,� f4* ..i ins • .-•,i,.. . t s �.! A,,,!,,P, { '+ l <-� 4, kil rapt .. 4'' .., r.jatif ., 1--,' )Ikg '' , ' v,,,. . ,. _ .„ - k,... .i„,, ._i.-.- ,-!.'-11- -- ,...,:,:,--- - _-A,,t4i'V — oot ....ii , 40•40:,... ...: . _„if„,f. . •• i t d" i. ...„.„. .. .:.,,,,,,,..."„4. .,:::;.i........__ ,____. .. S t p .., • ...„: „..., .. ., ..._,...„.,.. .,;___i,.7.•:::_:1_,,..,,7„,,, ,,„ ,,,,,,t �i „,,e.:.„....„„,„.,;„ ,,...,,,,„,„. ,, ,„,„,',. _, . e f&' C y,w Above:The existing built form includes a ark...„. ,„...._„...... .„...,.„...,....._ ...... ,_ diverse mix of post-war tower-in-the-p apartments,mid-century mid-rise apartments and more recent tower+podium building types,surrounded by a tight grid of single family homes and ravines Below:Future character areas and public realm analysis , x.. .. ` s t I • rz• F k 42 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Yonge-Eglinton Built Form Study yY i+• _ , P• i4 yt Y IIF tt. ,--:,..4.4..i:- • - . .,.- "-,, -:...44.7,' . . '..., v.z,N.:.i-e,--.--,:w.: ._,..-. - ,:„.. . .. i- .... ......._.., � li ` 1....0 � �4,i! r + , t - f ,A1' a L, /a ' - eF 4F ti, 0 . : „, +�+„, .;; M .a. -71t�u.ln '. '," _„..s_ -�...1. *.. Hyl; Perkins&Will Ludlam Trail Miami, Florida Client:City of Toronto Size:6 Miles Years of Engagement:2106-2017 Reference: Jose M.Gonzalez,Senior Vice President,Florida East Coast Industries-305.520.2300 Project experience by the firm s" .. ,,..r.ro a' e + kl'irc r��'� w'€r�a' "3 Af'r y f cvn e x 4-, x � , t 1 � vm , • •i � � � . a tea, r'� . xfs^{;te a ' 4,1'...r.,.�a �� ,.fu7 xr .1 .1-i.. / ,, . ' ' ,r . ti .. .s4 �,. 9, , t � RC �. r1" Y�w -C9 � � 03 t y aS -=-'''''. `'3. '''''Ci'' FF4 ; ' '' .i'lf-1.*,.' z.i.'• ‘-..°''''' '` —- ,A7-1*:', tali m''''' ,_. .74...!' . 7.-1--..„, --,.. .-,-- - _ . .t-.IT.'"It#'; 1' , r-,v,4 ,o-'4,`-t.:---- ' - Pr . ,.,,,,,-- '..:.,. .p ' - -:,,,- ''",- --„:';'. - .',.\''',,i,...1-.--':: -,- ..- tA 9 w .-. -.,-,- ,- , z„, ,,,.. .- -f ., ... ..r..., . _ . .., .. . . . , ..,..,,,, ....., .. ..,p., L, ,.. , ,,„ ..,.., ....... t , ,,,:.. -r, - --- ,.r- ' '-' '37- 1,.'...'' ki''la; _esi..Zric,s'''''.*r s; */,-..)17t ei::' "ii' _. r • ' ' ' '''..tgi-.4:`,.-.i, ...,. A , .., Ta... • !`,._•••''.. a ' rift._,,,,,;•.:•"•• '- 4- ' `' r;4�' a 'a',x sF '''.,4 .j, • —WHAT ITIS The Ludlam Trail Corridor Master Plan is a Trail and Development Master Plan for a generally 100 feet wide,+/-6 mile segment of a former Trail and development Florida East Coast Railway spur-line which will ultimately be codified and an incorporated as an Amendment into the Miami-Dade County master plan for a Comprehensive Development Master Plan. former segment The purpose of the Ludlam Trail Corridor is to enhance regional mobility, of the Florida East provide opportunities for physical activity and improve the economic vitality of the area by facilitating the conversion of this former railway Coast Railway. corridor into a continuous publicly-accessible primarily pedestrian and bicycle trail while ensuring that development along the Corridor occurs at appropriate locations and in a manner that is sensitive to and compatible with adjacent uses.This study has identified an opportunity for a regionally significant trail and greenway along the Corridor that will connect to the County's greenway and trail network,link the surrounding communities and provide vital neighborhood connections. 44 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Ludlam Trail S6T1- 40TH ST .. , ,. ...._._. 2.f/r7Cs \\ • Vei %.,* I .0,577.1<-7" • 1 I I ¢ j# W i jp F, w 1 #i. 31 I `. ,; • a The proposed land use provisions of the Ludlam Trail Corridor will be implemented through the adoption of Land Development Regulations to be adopted Miami-Dade County and shall define the urban form of development within the Corridor including flexible design standards and appropriate transitions to adjacent uses,as well as the configuration and design parameters of the recreational trail. The continuous trail throughout the Corridor will also connect to the+/-10 mile Underline RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH trail project being implemented by the Friends of the Underline in collaboration with Miami-Dade County. Land Development Regulations • Development and trail standards will emphasize convenient pedestrian Urban Condition Landscaping and bicycle access to public transportation,incorporate Crime Prevention • Regulations Through Environmental Design(CPTED)principles to enhance trail safety and security and will incorporate canal crossings conforming to the Strong Graphic Skills • Miami-Dade County Manatee Protection Plan. Streamlining Land • Development Processes 45 Perkins&Will Village of Coconut Grove Village Core Master Plan Miami, Florida Client:Coconut Grove Business Improvement District Size:±150 acres Years of Engagement:2016-2018 Reference: Tim Schmand,Executive Director Lincoln Road Business Improvement District,Inc. 1620 Drexel Avenue,Suite 100 Miami Beach,FL 33139 305.600.0219 tim@lincolnroad.com Project experience by the firm and PlusUrbia u '..41,•1-',44,:,:;:,:,z..,t' ate\ t uk ' a k - r •..' • pyxr`' VI '' b,„ .. as `A 1,8 ' t,..°'v,' . ' ,gf° { fit^ ,:n .+ ,'i d" --Ale ' ' "+ .?,,,,,,4„,v,,,r,t. . ::, '.. . . r s.� ..„,,,,...., _ .,. , '',4_ • . s P $4 n a, {� R'�amw 3'i""> {k � x ^k, rr 33PP''� `44,1 ag. N X ,, ,- J , !:- jY:ff 1. " JA .% y .. °'rA Cavi { ": ,.tl� a 7'1 ¢ R. i* ;44....,,,,,:..,2)‘,.4,4--,--'w. .F. 4�M,, i� ''''45,,,;'::.A. !: 4 }.� p yam. -'.. ' ''''''''iY.5"-.:'4.tiolt4.' .,,,7.;‘, c,. „44 ,,, !,4„,4,1., \ 5 _ _4:..._1,-, 4,,. .,,. , , _ ., 4 ,..4, .... .. ..., ,.. , a 46 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Extensive Steakholder Input Created from extensive stakeholder input,the plan is a comprehensive overview and specific action roadmap to guide proper growth that positively impacts both economic development and quality of life.Clearly-illustrated guidelines work within the Miami 21 form-based code. n: r a The results-oriented plan provides the tools to preserve the - '" i I'` identity and character while improving open space,mobility, , ,a• ; ,, land use and form,community and resiliency of Coconut is Grove's Village Core.The goal is to create a vibrant Village t. # movable 7,74 bollards Core while protecting the tranquil and livable adjacent residential neighborhoods that make Coconut Grove Miami's unique Garden District. f it The master plan contains step-by-step policy recommendations that empower the BID to re-energize the heart of the Village Core and have a clear long-term roadmap for the years to come.It establishes the BID as the central Top:analysis for the needs of the BID coordinating body to ensure that great ideas become fully- Bottom:Visioning sessions with the implemented physical improvements. Coconut Grove community The project was completed as a PlusUrbia/Perkins and Will collaboration. j RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH / , , � Land Development Regulations • , , wg� czz • A�. j ',., Regulations A t , ; . , W, . Building Community Consensus • 1 's G j , Strong Graphic Skills • � 1 1 6 f 4,. . i ' � 47� j . Perkins&Will Resilience Strategies 1 100 Resilient Cities Toronto, Louisville, Minneapolis (Project Reference for Toronto) Project Overview Client:City of Toronto URL:https://www.resilienttoronto.ca/ Understanding how residents survive,adapt,and thrive in the face of significant Location:Toronto challenges is at the root of our work with 100 Resilient Cities(100RC)in Toronto, Years of Engagement:2017-2019 Louisville,and Minneapolis over the last 3 years.Working with the 100RC program, Reference: we helped not only individual cities in advancing their local resilience,but also Amy Buitenhuis,Senior Policy Advisor- facilitated the building of a larger global movement and practice of resilience Strategy Development,Resilience Office among governments,organizations,the private sector,and individuals. City Manager's Office Within Toronto,Louisville,and Minneapolis,a multi-year process of developing 416.338.7743 Amy.Buitenhuis@toronto.ca each city's Resilience Strategy began with extensive stakeholder consultations Project experience bythe firm and a preliminary assessment to identify the specific resilience challenges that we face in our growing city contexts.Major shocks and stresses were further refined through broad engagement and localized workshops.A theory of change and a suite of recommendations-championed by City divisions,partners,and neighborhood organizations-were created and documented in a final Strategy. Toronto is one of the fastest growing and most diverse cities in the world,but like other global cities,Toronto's success is paired with significant challenges.Financial and social inequality is growing,especially between those living downtown and in the inner suburban neighborhoods.Changing climates will mean more extreme and costly weather events,which will be felt most by vulnerable populations.As a result,Toronto's Resilience Strategy focused on the overlap of equity and climate challenges,with flagship actions focusing on neighborhood,flood,vertical(i.e. tower apartments)and home resilience. Louisville is a mid-America,mid-sized city enjoying the cultural confluence of Midwestern sensibilities and Southern hospitality.Like most American communities,however,Louisville faces a number of serious and interrelated social,economic and health challenges:from a city budget severely impacted by state-mandated changes in their employee pension obligation,to inequity,to the thread of increased storms,floods,and droughts in the future.These burdens and threads fall disproportionately on certain population subgroups,especially people of color and other minorities.Louisville's Resilience Strategy focused on four key pillars that were created to address issues of inequity and lack of trust: Embrace Lifelong Learning,Ensure a Safe+Healthy City,Build a Vibrant Economy + Place,and Innovate in Civic Engagement.These pillars,along with the goals and actions outlined under them,provide a roadmap for how Louisville will grow in the coming decades. 48 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Resilient Conversions Toolkit: Helping Underutilized Space: Community Investment Case residents, community actors and groups to Studies and Community Spaces Inventory hold conversations about resilience O3/RES#UENTCONVERSATION , ;.:4,-,, TOOLKR.THE S TOOLS OF • s¢t ` ,,,, RESILIENCE PePr �v.� A TTS .. w•-•et6Nt� .».. pg . . . 3 ., ,_ _.r*~ Community opening of the RAC Zoned, Recipe for ...__ Community space in 415 Driftwood Ave(2018,Perkins&Will) s 7„,r $ -a lie r.. ... , ? Wild-\ , allAtillif '` r., lid 99 S A w *' 41,) . ” ,, q -... alt k:*4.,.f: e _,:.. ;:l a E . Resilient Conversations Workshop in the Agincourt neighbourhood,facilitated by the City's Resilience Office and C3 Web-based Community Spaces Inventory,co-developed by the Jane-Finch Community Centre and Perkins&Will Resilience Strategy A st rdlegy in thr,focui 4tFas f DUITY = GOALS FOCUS AREAS �, 1. Torontoniam'homes are morere dent b'xS ,b°'c. 4 ..... 2 Cnmmue Yies take act,on to improve reohe,,e,M Men } le a�.,a aal- neighbour eood, PEOPLE AND �� 3.Toronto has diverse,creative housing solutions that ensure housl NEIGHBOURHOODS CLIMATE AND n 9k affordability EIMRONMENT �//�� d {. Imp,oveegmly dndlMUte poverty. "b y3„ �`- E. Toronto a more resYKm to dimat clMrsge,including Me hasands I sx{v. .,y, of flooding and heat j CNK ENGAGEMENT )I e,I �/l G - 2. Infrastructure and buildings are resilient to a^hsanging climate and suppo,treduction ingreenhouse gas emissio INFRASTRUCTURE a y� - -. 2 To,onto has muhipk rduhk,affosdaMe,and safe mobdit tlwu Mat reduce the amount of time it takes to get around COMMUNITIES AND ` '�` r"` NEIGHBOURHOODS #.01 4 ." > a$~ t. Civil:engagement and trust in Meaty im prove,and our leadership better reflects In,umok diversity ^� 3. The City prioritizes the most vulnerable and highest risk HouSING -ii` nour deo HMI making. LEADING A RESILIENT CITY 3. Indigenous communities have a leadership role in building resilience. 4. Institutionalize resilience into the City's decision making and take leadership on resilience. Moew v 61 The Resilience Strategy recommendations were framed around 3 Focus Areas,in response to public feedback on 6 high intensity resilience challenges 49 Perkins&Will 100 Resilient Cities While Minneapolis is a successful city today,the city's resilience is challenged 01 by inequitable patterns.Local shocks and stresses include recent events of civil 02 unrest and infrastructure failure due to changing climates,but also the city's 'V' ill. deep history in socioeconomic inequality and structural racism.Minneapolis' Resilience Strategy is currently being developed,exploring three main discovery wit areas: Minneapolis looks after People,Minneapolis critically reflects on Itself, 04 visions and Minneapolis looks to the Future.A resilient Minneapolis is a place where 10 goals systems are constantly adapting and helping to realize a more equitable and just 46 actions place to live. 04 Services Provided '.',;../, The Perkins and Will team worked closely with each municipality's Chief Resilience eller?. Officer,City departments,local organizations and residents on the development of the three different Resilience Strategies throughout the last few years.The team supported the development of policy recommendations and the design/delivery of the Resilience Strategy document,as well as digital and in-person engagement activities. Each strategy also involved an in-depth analysis and understanding of what processes,systems,and functions had to be in place to ensure that local governments are grounded in long-term and integrated planning that utilizes a resilience lens in their work.Perkins and Will reflected on how different policy structures plan for the uncertain future in a way that ensures it can address the challenges and opportunities created by emerging trends--such as climate change and population growth. Process What's already happening thats elevating resilience in the city? Q -a i q.._, -,--......- Top:Graphic identity for Louisville Aff, v ar,on:<e Y Bottom Left:Minneapolis Resilience Process Graphic or„a r o <.D„p a"y' Bottom Right:Toronto flooding Planning and <3J !'J1�J! SA lylls 16 ��--��,,,...... mall Business St/stainability Team Orma•tmontof tog Arts.Culture. ' g„,,,„e Geetive City Economy Coordinator's „, - Race Office Emergency v A '+ Equity Preparedness v.ami L„ % Promise Innovatlen ¢ Li l,i, I- vo-'- ,,-4--1','-,--„s— ::: 4":4'zil I I Zonc Team t �,.�,y� ^'* Intergovernmental (� aT' _4�'f+R^'- H""'' is •}'M'3 xewtan. _ _ 1t. 50 � or 1, Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 100 Resilient Cities Roadmap to this chapter ,.. `'� a b.. ,,, n ._......_.. _ .__ “statna.Sny 000• visions �..__, ,w•a.,a< .0 LaiI; in , .r._._. la , .1 NB ' i ' w� as _-_ 29 6611 72. �F .,.:..�.. _ mss" �:,.a:•.x:.,ra•rwwa e.7721',---IL] • R _ Tao ___..� 7 5 108 .ttvr .,Roa iis eoaw*T 1 0 H • MOS w w w ___ goals �&.. n 5•se .E. L 0 .,_............ ....... , ....... 7:1:{_�Y! ...._y.�-L �;.�� rT-o�+S? a,uoarxyrw.a f3.. ��•-. .� w..,.. '_. 'd^TM"' P.axse Aans T :,R^ YeC�"•'..'.'1."G 46 - — =_ actions ] "! -, The City Resilience Framework (toe.tnd by Arys wrh marxr'tom arc Redds;fer F0,00.1.7.00 The Cry Res..ervn Fr.taa(CRF/ crowd..a le,srounderstand;ha mmpte.rtycrtat.esa:rdthe drnrs 7m ct'v'itAra to tontr..kmte and a c.v..,wxoege stat enemas oi.a tc shoe Imow'.edge and eppere ncea.Px CI*a bolt on,o r e0,e-!dime.•.o.•t 1 cede—cup 8 Strategy,sienth&We,berg honors.&Sexier,and int.',,A s t& E,rs rtmen; I, .A ��Tro ,4:41,:•.. I n s, Top:Graphics for Louisville vision and goals 4,{ o `Ay H"t"..4,-. , Right:Louisville Resilient City Framework '` e °% ` - ro° t r r Mr sa �! �. T 4 P+'•stMl r ,, S ' LOUISVILLE'S -r% R— RESILIENCE Tn a J RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH s � A �� ` / � j 1 �ill * .+' d Y �_� ..--, / ---;;;;;,-,.\ .c P0. Land Development Regulations • Ryr*"..*:::* J' , paw<t. r.o. — Cd '''''' .wr., ,,.u. err �„<. k � .b Land Use Plans+Flooding • r , ,, os-4, / i.gt %ben --a-- Ay Se ° Jo € Building Community Consensus • '4,,,„9",,,,,-- �R :,€ /j e : It- Strong Graphic Skills • J '' ¢ts!I i tt k t 4' 51 Perkins&Will Jose Gelabert-Navia, AIA, LEED AP® Managing Principal With over thirty seven years of experience as an architect,Mr.Gelabert-Navia is the Regional Director for Latin America of Perkins&Will.Jose has been n° involved in a variety of projects,including academic buildings,museums, t, corporate and residential work.He is an expert in complex,mixed-used projects involving a variety of markets including retail,housing,and corporate offices.He has also been involved with Civic,Healthcare and Education projects in both the United States and Latin America.Jose is currently a 1 • _ Professor of Architecture and formerly the Dean of the School of Architecture N,w at the University of Miami. Education Project Experience 600 Biscayne Boulevard Master of Arts 709 Alton Road Miami,Florida Cornell University Miami Beach,Florida Village of Merrick Park Bachelor of Architecture 1212 Lincoln Road Offices and Housing Blocks Cornell University Miami Beach,Florida Coral Gables,Florida Diploma de Arquitecto 930 Washington Avenue Town of Chiva Universidad Central de Miami Beach,Florida New City Population 200,000 Caracas Valencia,Spain City of Miami Beach Registrations City Hall Annex DYL Center Mixed-Use Complex Miami Beach,Florida Coral Gables, Florida Architect Florida Crescent Heights Barclay's Bank Performing Arts Center(PAC) Florida and Latin American Headquarters NCARB Miami,Florida Miami, Florida LEED°Accredited City of Delray Beach Professional Global Financial Institution Public Library Sunrise Corporate Center Project Affiliations Sunrise,Florida Delray Beach,Florida 777 North Pine Island Road Victoria Ward Properties Professor,Former Dean Mixed-Use Complex Universityof Miami Master Plan Honolulu,Hawaiio Plantation,Florida Coral Gables St.Agatha Catholic Church Mediterranean American Airlines Architecture Committee Admirals Club Miami,Florida American Institute of Miami,Florida Architects 52 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Kricket Snow, AIA, LEED°AP Project Manager An Associate Principal at Perkins&Will in Miami,Kricket is responsible for the management of various project types ranging from custom interiors ` • to multi-acre site developments.In her 20+years of experience as both an architect and owner's project manager,her focus has been on large scale,complex building projects.As a Senior Project Manager,Kricket is responsible for managing and directing key personnel within an integrated, cross-disciplinary team structure that prioritizes collaboration.This enables ,..• constant communication with the client as well as the project team,resulting *,} in efficiently produced,high-quality design solutions. As an active member t in the Miami design community,she has served on the City of Miami Planning fig•`. ,y Board,served as President of AIA Miami,and currently serves on the Board of y, Directors for the Miami Center for Architecture and Design. Education Project Experience Regional Plan Association State of the Master of Architecture 1212 Lincoln Road Region's Health:Regional Health Impact Assessment* Arizona State University Miami Beach,Florida New York City, New York Bachelor of Design 709 Alton Road University of Florida Miami Beach, Florida Global Affairs Canada Urban/Rural Development Systems* Registrations SNAP Cafe Mzuzu,Malawi Architecture Miami Beach,Florida Premium Airport Lounges Florida Project Oceania Hong Kong International Airport,Miami IIDA Miami Beach,Florida International Airport,Philadelphia Florida Galleria Development International Airport,Seattle-Tacoma Fort Lauderdale,Florida International Airport NCARB o Confidential Luxury Automotive Group American Airlines D15 LEED®Accredited Admiral's Club Professional Offices&Showroom Coral Gables,Florida Miami International Airport Miami,Florida Project Affiliations Florida's Turnpike Service Plazas Conceptual Design&Planning Phase* International Concourse at Ft.Lauderdale- Board of Directors Hollywood International Airport* Miami Center for Florida Ft.Lauderdale, Florida Architecture&Design Little Haiti Cultural Center* Miami,Florida Administrative Offices for Broward County Aviation Department* Ft.Lauderdale,Florida •denotes experience prior to Perkins&Will 53 Perkins&Will Paul Kulig, OAA, MRAIC, BES, B ARCH Urban Design Principal An architect and urban designer,Paul is also a Principal at Perkins&Will's 700.1ww, Toronto studio where he leads Urban Design practice.His work for both public - and private sector clients is shaped by a strong commitment to the public realm and a deep understanding of the roles social equity and economics play in city building.Over his 20-year career,Paul has led numerous award- winning projects for key public spaces,vibrant mixed-use neighbourhoods and urban infrastructure including Toronto's new downtown plan:TOcore; t Toronto's first Resilience Strategy and the Framework Plan for Detriot's Corktown neighborhood.He has pioneered the application of computational modelling and analytical tools towards urban design codes that support a high quality of life in rapidly developing neighborhoods. Research forms i a key part of Paul's work and he has been invited to contribute to several publications on performance-based codes,sustainable public realm design ;. and resilience.He is also a frequent public speaker and organizer,presenting on topics of sustainable community design and active transportation. Education Project Experience Meadoway Trail,Conceptual Design Bachelor of Architecture TOcore Built Form Study Toronto,Ontario University of Waterloo Toronto,Ontario Keating Precinct Plan Bachelor of Environmental Yonge-Eglinton Built Form and Davisville Toronto,Ontario Studies Public Realm Study Bloor-lslington TOD Feasiblity Study University of Waterloo Toronto,Ontario Toronto,Ontario Project Affiliations City of Toronto/100 Resilient Cities Eglinton West LRT Steetscape Study Toronto Resilience Strategy Toronto,Ontario Member Toronto,Ontario Ontario Association of Davisville Public Realm Study City of Minneapolis/100 Resilient Toronto,Ontario Architects CitiesMinneapolis Resilience Strategy Barrie Mid-rise Urban Design Guidelines Member Minneapolis,MN Vaughan Design Review Barrie,Ontario Panel City of Louisville Louisville Tunney's Pasture Master Plan Resilience Strategy Ottawa,Ontario Outreach Committee Louisville,KY Urban Land Institute Allen District Urban Design Guidelines* City of Detroit Greater Corktown Neighborhood Framework Plan Toronto,Ontario Detroit,MI Highland Creek Village Streetscape Plan* Scarborough,Ontario Vaughn Metropolitan Centre Urban Design Guidelines Downtown Hamilton Tall Building Vaughan,Ontario Guidelines* Hamilton,Ontario Gateway Mobility Hubs and Intensification Corridors Study South of Eastern Urban Design Study* Brampton,Ontario Toronto,Ontario 54 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Leonardo Alvarez, FASLA, LEEDAP® Landscape Architecture Principal Over the course of 30 years in professional practice,Leo has successfully .„ realized a wide range of projects types including campus,urban,and regional master plans,mixed-use projects,transportation facilities, 'C ,�,. Au^ educational environments,healthcare facilities,and historic preservation efforts.Leo's portfolio of award-winning projects highlights his depth of - versatility and vision,significantly in sustainable design and contributions rr «', _i . , to the public realm.In addition to his accomplishments in urban design, landscape architecture,and architecture,Leo's career in academia spans 17 ., „,gyp years with Florida International University and the University of Georgia.At 0 ' Perkins&Will,he brings his leadership and experience to the roles of Design Principal and the firm's Inaugural National Urban Design Discipline Leader. 0*. h yea * , , - % , Education Project Experience Atlanta BeltLine,Inc. Master of Landscape City of Miami Beach* BeltLine Corridor Design Atlanta,Georgia Architecture Oceanfront Neighborhood Master Plan Harvard University Miami Beach,Florida Common Wealth of Puerto Rico Bachelor of Science, City of Miami Beach Puerto Rico Capital District Master Plan Architecture Technology Islands Neighborhood Master Plan San Juan, Puerto Rico Florida International Miami Beach,Florida City of Fort Lauderdale* University City of Miami Beach* Davie Boulevard Corridor Master Plan Registrations North Shore Recreation Corridor Master Ft.Lauderdale,Florida Landscape Architect Plan City of Dorado* Miami Beach,Florida Dorado 2025 Vision Plan Florida,Alabama,Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, City of Miami Beach* Dorado,Puerto Rico Maryland,North Carolina, Flamingo/Lummus Neighborhood Master Miami-Dade County Park&Recreation Pennsylvania,South Plan Department Carolina,Tennessee,Texas, Miami Beach,Florida Multiple Projects: Virginia Redlands Fruit and Spice Park City of Miami Beach* Architect Victory Garden Eden Lakes Park New York Miami Beach,Florida Medsouth Park Rock Ridge Park LEED°Accredited City of Miami Beach* Tree Islands Park Professional Miami Beach Botanical Garden Miami-Dade County,Florida Miami Beach,Florida Florida International University City of Miami Beach* Campus Master Plan,District Plan Wayfinding and Signage Program Miami,Florida Miami Beach,Florida *denotes experience done prior to Perkins&Will 55 Perkins&Will Patricia Bosch, AIA, LEED AP° Architecture Design Principal/Architecture Resiliency Expert A founding partner of the Miami office of Perkins&Will since 1996,Pat Bosch leads the office as its Design Director.Internationally recognized for her design acumen and collaborative work style,Pat routinely brings together . diverse groups of stakeholders to generate ideas and find common ground; design solutions emerge out of the strong partnerships Pat builds with her clients.Pat takes a humanistic and environmentally responsible approach to design that is supported by research and meticulously executed process. She combines edgy creativity with a careful examination of every project's program,context,region,and local culture to produce design solutions so 1 " innovative that they consistently challenge the status quo. Pat's work has been honored with several national and international design awards,and has been featured in architectural magazines and industry journals around the world Education Project Experience TREO Somi Station Master of Architecture 709 Alton Road South Miami,Florida Columbia University Miami Beach,Florida Florida Internation University Technology Diploma 1212 Lincoln Road Campus Master Plan,District Plan Miami,Florida ETH/Swiss Federal Institute Miami Beach,Florida of Technology Miami Dade College 930 Washington Avenue Registrations Miami Beach,Florida Academic Support Center Miami,Florida LEED Accredited City of Miami Beach Professional City Hall Annex Florida Internation University USGBC Miami Beach,Florida Academic Health Center 4 Miami,Florida Hotel Victor Florida Internation University Miami Beach,Florida Academic Health Center 5 American Express Miami,Florida Sunrise Corporate Center Sunrise,Florida Nicklaus Children's Hospital Advanced Pediatric Care Pavilion Bayview Market Miami,Florida Multi-Use Retail,Housing&Parking Facility Miami, Florida Platinum on the Bay Residential Mixed Use Tower Miami,Florida 2937 Biscayne Blvd.Mixed-Use Miami,Florida 56 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Douglas D. Pierce,AIA, LEED®Fellow, RELi AP Resiliency Expert Doug is licensed architect with 30 years of experience. He has been practicing interdisciplinary design with Perkins&Will for over 19 years,working across design sectors with experience in campus and urban planning,corporate and civic workplaces,science and technology,and higher education.A LEED Fellow and recognized leader in resilient,sustainable,and high- performance design, Doug champions these initiatives for the Minneapolis office of Perkins&Will and co-chairs our National Resilient Design Task Force. x °' In addition to his broad experience working with several sustainability + resiliency standards and delivery methods,Doug championed RELi = , Resiliency Action List+Catalog to develop next generation communities, 1,4 �'"'•" neighborhoods,buildings,homes,and infrastructure.Doug is also actively involved in both teaching and research to further advance the theory and practice of more holistic and integrated design. k• Education Board-US Green Building Project Experience Embassy Medical System Council,Minnesota Chapter Colombo,Sri Lanka Bachelor of Architecture City of Minneapolis/100 (2010-2011) (Cum Laude) Resilient CitiesMinneapolis Great River Energy Kansas State University Board-National Resilience Strategy Headquarters Registrations Leadership Standards Minneapolis,MN Maple Grove,Minnesota Campaign(2010-present) Architect 801 Marquette Building Green Spaces Corporate Chair-AIA Minnesota Asset Repositioning Office Missouri Committee on the Minneapolis, Minnesota New Delhi,India Leadership in Energy and Environment(2002 Allina Corporate Kraft Foods Environmental Design -present) Headquarters Northfield,Illinois (LEED®)FELLOW Institute for Market Minneapolis,Minnesota Laurentian Environmental Sustainable Materials Transformation to American Lung Association Center Rating Technology(SMaRT) Sustainability(MTS) Accredited Professional of MN Minneapolis, Minnesota Member-SMART Healthy Office Prototype MEDICA Corporate RELi Accredited Professional Sustainable Building St.Paul,Minnesota Headquarters Materials Committee Project Affiliations Amherst H.Wilder Minnetonka,Minnesota Member-MTS Executive Foundation Chair-RELi Steering Committee Wilder Center Microsoft Committee,US Green Corporate Campus Plan+ Building Council Board-Cleanwater Action St.Paul,Minnesota Implementation of Minnesota City of Minneapolis Fargo, North Dakota Board-Perkins&Will, The Consolidated Office Sustainability Council Building Pre-Design Regenerative Design Republic of Maldives Founder-US Green Minneapolis,Minnesota Building Council,Minnesota Chapter 57 Perkins&Will Clara Romero, AIA, LEED AP° Urban Designer Clara is a Senior Urban Designer and Associate with over fifteen years of experience.She brings focused attention to the relationship between built form and the urban environment,and understands the importance of interface and transition in creating cohesive,functional and beautiful places. Clara is currently leading Perkins&Will's King-Parliament Secondary Plan 4. Review,as well as the Eglinton West Streetscape and Planning Study for the Air 0/I City of Toronto.Through her work on a number of master plans,streetscape plans,built form guidelines and feasibility studies,for both the private and public sector,Clara has developed a particular expertise in the analysis of development potential,and its balance with public realm infrastructure. g� Clara was most recently the Project Manager and Lead Urban Designer for Toronto's downtown master plan:TOcore'Building for Liveability'. Education Project Experience Public Works and Government Services Master of Urban Design, City of Toronto Canada Tunney's Pasture Master Plan University of Toronto,2012 Yonge-Eglinton Built Form Study Toronto,Ontario Ottawa,Ontario Master of Architecture, Build Toronto Escuela Tecnica Superior City of Toronto de Arquitectura de Madrid, TOcore'Building for Liveability'Built Form 399 The West Mall Conceptual Master Plan 2008 Study Toronto,Ontario Registrations Toronto,Ontario Crescent School City of Toronto/100 Resilient Cities Crescent School Master Campus Plan Intern,Ontario Association Toronto,Ontario of Architects Toronto Resilience Strategy Toronto,Ontario City of Brampton Architect,Madrid Bramalea GO Station Conceptual Design City of Detroit Greater Corktown Association of Architects Toronto,Ontario Neighborhood Framework Plan (COAM) Detroit,MI City of Brampton LEED°AP ND,Canada Bovaird-Hurontario Conceptual Design Green Building Council City of Toronto Toronto,Ontario King-Parliament Secondary Plan Review Project Affiliations Toronto,Ontario City of Toronto City of Toronto Don Mills Crossing Mobility Study Toronto,Ontario Urban Land Institute Eglinton West Planning and Streetscape Study Metrolinx Toronto,Ontario Aurora GO Station-Station Area Plan City of Barrie Aurora,Ontario Barrie Mid-rise Urban Design Guidelines City of Calgary Barrie,Ontario North and South Crosstown BRT Corridors Calgary,Alberta 58 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Rebecca Ramsey, AICP, LEED®Green Associate, RELi AP Planner Rebecca is a professional planner with seven years of planning experience across the United States,Canada and Africa.She has experience working ., f on complex master plan and development projects,with a special focus on ffr/,;r,ft �Y strategies to strengthen relationships between stakeholders.Her abilities / �' # include spatial and socioeconomic analysis towards the development of market-based community design concepts.Rebecca enjoys integrating her i previous research on the community benefit models of urban institutions as well as exploring innovative design strategies and process methods for •:• sustainable development and neighbourhood resilience. itA „ Rebecca led Perkins and Will's efforts on Toronto's first Resilience Strategy and :r'' is currently the lead Planner on the Corktown Framework Plan in Detroit. ' >, o• Education Project Experience Mid-America Regional Council Master of Urban Planning City of Toronto/100 Resilient Cities Corridor Master Plan&Design Strategy Harvard Graduate School Toronto Resilience Strategy Overland Park,Kansas of Design Concentration: Toronto,Ontario City of Faribault Health&Community Downtown Master Plan;Comprehensive City of Minneapolis/100 Resilient Development CitiesMinneapolis Resilience Strategy Plan;Parks,Trails&Open Space Plan Bachelor of Urban& Minneapolis, MN Faribault,Minnesota Regional Planning Toronto Port Lands Company City of Detroit Greater Corktown Ryerson University Neighborhood Framework Plan Adaptive Re-Use Study for the Hearn Registrations Detroit,MI Generating Station* Toronto,Canada AICP Certified Professional City of Toronto/100 Resilient Cities Planner Toronto Resilience Strategy Cancer Care Ontario-Ontario Ministry of Health&Long-Term Care-Province-wide Toronto,Ontario LEED®Accredited Cancer Center Performance Study Professional Minnesota Capitol Area Architectural Toronto,Ontario,Canada USGBC and Planning Board and City of St.Paul Commercial Vitality Zone Market Study Regional Plan Association State of the RELi Resilience Accredited Region's Health:Regional Health Impact Professional St.Paul, Minnesota Assessment* US Environmental Protection Agency New York City, New York Project Affiliations Implementation Strategies for a Sustainable Duluth Global Affairs Canada Associate Member Urban/Rural Development Systems* Urban Land Insitute Duluth,Minnesota Mzuzu,Malawi Member Mixed-Use Development RFEI Study American Planning Memphis,Tennessee Association City of St.Paul *denotes experience prior to Perkins&Will Rice-Larpenteur Gateway Vision Plan Maplewood,Roseville,and St.Paul, Minnesota 59 Perkins&Will Gelabert-Sanchez, LLP Planning Consulting Services "I led the City of Miami's Planning Department for over ten years during Miami's greatest growth period in history. With an estimated population of 424,662 in 2007, Miami is the largest city within the Miami Metropolitan area. My responsibilities included administering a $2.8 Million budget and directing a staff of 30 professionals in the areas of general planning, land development, urban design, historic preservation, zoning and community planning." Biography Ana Gelabert-Sanchez,AICP, has over 25 years experience in the Planning field. In 2010 she was awarded a Loeb Fellowship at Harvard University's Graduate School of Design.She was Planning Director for - tik t the City of Miami from 1998 to 2010. As Planning Director,Ana led the Miami 21 initiative, a form-based ). 'i zoning code that takes a holistic approach to land use and urban planning; making Miami a more sustainable, pedestrian-friendly and better-planned city. Miami was the first major U.S. city to adopt a form-based zoning citywide code. Miami 21 won numerous awards, including the American Planning Association National Planning Excellence Award for Best Practice in 2011. Ana directed all urban planning programs,including coordinating, developing,and implementing Miami's Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, directing a professional staff in the areas of general planning,land development, urban design, historic Point of Contact: Ana M.Gelabert-Sanchez preservation,community planning and zoning.She led several Principal-Gelabert-Sanchez,LLP planning efforts, including the Museum Park master plan,the 411 Hardee Road Coral Gables,Florida 33146 Coconut Grove master plan,the Virginia Key master plan,and the t.786 208 9030 Parks and Public Spaces master plan.Ana also led the review and e.ana.m.gelabert@gmail.com 60 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team approval of more than 75,000 residential units, approximately 6,000 hotel rooms,over 8 million square feet of office space,and 7 million square feet 10;' i `I f • . of retail space,contributing to Miami's urban growth. �y.�w llama.. : _ -. . 'c' iii '1 Ana holds bachelor degrees in architecture and fine { arts from the Rhode Island School of Design and r Y - a master's in landscape architecture from Harvard's Graduate . ,* School of Design.She has also worked as an Urban Planning and Design Critic at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. Ana was named Top Public Official of the year for 2010 by Governing magazine and received the CNU Groves Award on L Leadership and Vision in 2011. She is currently Principal of Gelabert-Sanchez LLC,a Planning and Design consulting firm. Miami 21 A comprehensive approach to land use and urban planning focused on overhauling Miami's Zoning Ordinance,from a Euclidean zoning code into a form-based code based on Smart Growth and New Urbanist principles.This fundamental shift emphasizes form rather than use and encourages sustainable economic and urban development while addressing issues of affordable housing,historic preservation, and parks and open spaces.Four years in the making and at a cost of$2.6 million dollars,the Miami 21 Plan received final approval from the Miami City Commission in October 2009,as well as accolades from the media and the community.Miami 21 has been hailed as"the most ambitious contemporary zoning code reform yet undertaken by a major U.S.city"by the Center for New Urbanism.Miami is the first major city in the U.S.to adopt a form based code and has received the following awards: • American Planning Association,National { Planning Excellence Award for Best Practice,2011 • American Planning Association,Florida '� --n. **" - -,;r 4: Award of Excellence.Best Practices.2010 , _ *, •• r' . ; ', , • Driehaus Form-Based Code Award with r-,.,' ! the Paul Crawford Distinction Award for a " ! �`- _ �' •01•.. ground-breaking code,2010 • American Architecture Award, ` ' ' Chicago Athenaeum t ;, € t + .� �! e ws. A -",r, Perkins&Will Ana Gelabert,AICP, LF Planning Lead,Gelabert-Sanchez, LLP Ana Gelabert-Sanchez,AICP,has over 25 years experience in the Planning field.In 2010 she was awarded a Loeb Fellowship at Harvard University and ',,:,444 `� was Planning Director for the City of Miami from 1998 to 2010,during Miami's 1 greatest growth period in history. °.- a .. 7,' ;.:0,,. ,:. 0cv :::"::: As Planning Director,Ana led the Miami 21 initiative,a form-based zoning code that takes a holistic approach to land use and urban planning;making `"` Miami a more sustainable,pedestrian-friendly and better-planned city. ".. .,,,:: Miami was the first major U.S.city to adopt a form-based zoning citywide " code.Miami 21 won numerous awards,including the American Planning Association National Planning Excellence Award for Best Practice in 2011. "'' 1" •5 Ana holds bachelor degrees in architecture from the Rhode Island School of Design and a master's in landscape architecture from Harvard's Graduate ') ; School of Design.She has also worked as an Urban Planning and Design a'' Critic at the Harvard Graduate School of Design.Ana was named Top Public 4-- Official of the year for 2010 by Governing magazine and received the CNU Groves Award on Leadership and Vision in 2011.She is currently Principal of ; Gelabert-Sanchez LLC,a Planning and Design consulting firm. Education Project Experience Miami Comprehensive Plan Outstanding Service Award, (1989-2000)-Parks and Belle Meade Homeowners Loeb Fellowship Neighborhood Enhancement Association Recreation Element Harvard University Team(NET)Administrator Urban Design Planner Certificate of Appreciation, Miami,Florida Y Master in Landscape Bayside Residents Association Architecture We Will Rebuild Community Involvement Certificate of Appreciation, Havard University Loan Executive Shorecrest Homeowners Ana has over 20 years of Association Miami-Dade County Bachelor of Fine Arts I extensive community outreach Bachelor of Architecture Watson Island Master experience. Waterfront Development Rhode Island School of Design Development Plan Master Plan,City of Miami, American Planning Association Urban Design Planner Awards and Honors Professional Affiliations European Honors Program, Downtown Miami Master Plan CNU Groves Award on Rhode Island School of Design Member Urban Design Planner Leadership and Vision-2011 Architectural Thesis Honors, American Institute of Certified Outstanding Service Award, Rhode Island School of Design Downtown Waterfront Master Partnership Planners Communityfor the Plan Homeless Site Visitor Urban Design Planner Distinguished Service Award, Planning Accreditation Board Lummus Park Redevelopment Greater Biscayne Boulevard Member Plan Chamber of Commerce American Planning Association Urban Design Planner Outstanding Service Award, Federation of the Upper East Member Miami River Study Side Urban Land Insitute Urban Design Planner Associate East-West Center 62 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Ana Gelabert-Sanchez Miami 21 A comprehensive approach to land use and urban planning focused on overhauling Miami's Zoning Ordinance,from a Euclidean zoning code into a form-based code based on Smart Growth and New Urbanist principles.This fundamental shift emphasizes form rather than use and encourages sustainable economic and urban development while addressing issues of affordable housing, historic preservation,and parks and open spaces.Four years in the making and at a cost of$2.6 million dollars,the Miami 21 Plan received final approval from the Miami City Commission in October 2009,as well as accolades from the media and the community. Miami 21 has been hailed as"the most ambitious contemporary zoning code reform yet undertaken by a major U.S.city"by the Center for New Urbanism.Miami is the first major city in the U.S.to adopt a form based code and has received the following awards: • American Planning Association,National Planning Excellence Award for Best Practice,2011 • American Planning Association,Florida Award of Excellence,Best Practices,2010 • Driehaus Form-Based Code Award with the Paul Crawford Distinction Award for a ground-breaking code,2010 • American Architecture Award,Chicago Athenaeum Master Plans 01. 02. 03. Museum Park Miami Parks and Public Space Master Coconut Grove Master Plan Plan The redevelopment of 30 acres of A coastal recreational plan waterfront property for cultural A comprehensive plan to guide emphasizing public open spaces, and recreational activity with an the Miami Park System.The waterfront promenades,and implementation budget of$68M. development of this master plan pedestrian connectivity with an The planning process included considered the community's implementation budget of$55M. a charrette that attracted 300 diverse cultural identities as well as Although the waterfront historically stakeholders,followed by four urban design and environmental had been one of the City's best- major public meetings.The plan sustainability.After over 40 public known assets,such a study had was presented to the Miami City meetings,with a project cost of never been performed.The Plan, Commission and was approved in $600,000,the plan was presented with a$650,000 project budget, the Spring of 2008. to and approved by the City was presented to and approved by Commission in the summer of 2007. the Miami City Commission in the The Plan received the 2007 FAPA summer of 2008. Award of Merit. 63 Perkins&Will _ r 5 _,.'a �.. "Z., ideirt:::::::c o ' Xarfa CruSral , cnora7 r S,Ibtotw,4 RscrsU,r a Urbana MI r.e ZnNoeurai , 4 4**** 4 Cmco .444 411 I 4 I I itil4.147. „/44\ 44 I il I 041 1 1111 I 11 P. '' ' Pi,011111.1 111111.1% ti4 ! ,41{14r .. ... 1*im , . . _... . .. „ _ ., � 4441Prillt-''''' - .:'' ft 400. - talikariblIA -.mom ,:,-:,,,..,. _ _ 40p. i , Oil---'4. /44:,,,,;,„, ,-,:i aft 11 ...... rijkl.,.:414:—.1461,- - --::- ' 7441-- :, , * ' rtg ,:.1,,,??..s.„:i7i,.,z:,,' I III arm in ... airi. in -Airminnii .........r: , I. EMO ( 1 Curridabat Plan WIN 4,4!V frieNtrre, Master Plan& Form Based Code The plan humanizes the city with wider sidewalks,parallel parking,planting strips and urban furniture.It also structures future development by ensuring smart , ?. :, growth and providing a safe and innovative �`:"; "''`"':6 '"�„�' environment for z; its citizens. Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services PlusUrbia PLUSURBIA About PlusUrbia PlusUrbia Design is an award-winning,Miami-based studio with expertise in community engagement,multimodal mobility,urban design, land-use planning,complete streets,transit oriented development and fee creation to support mobility and civic improvements. Our studio applies context-sensitive solutions to a full range of public and private sector projects in North,South and Central America as well as China and the Middle East. The firm's innovative Wynwood Neighborhood Revitalization District earned national,statewide and regional awards from the American Planning Association-including the 2017 APA National Gold Achievement Award for Economic Development Planning.The studio's Hialeah Transit Oriented Development Plan and companion Complete Streets guidelines won the 2017 APA Florida Award of Merit for Neighborhood Planning. Firm founder Juan Mullerat,Assoc.AIA,APA,NCI,CNU,was awarded the Urban Designer of the Year by the Miami Chapter of the American Institute of Architects.The DBE and SBE-certified boutique studio currently is on the team studying mobility and transit oriented development on the East-West corridor of the Miami-Dade County TPO's SMART Plan. The studio's online, multilingual visual preference surveys resulted in unprecedented input,from a wide range of diverse stakeholders,for its recent Little Havana Me Importa Action Plan and its Coconut Grove Village Core Master Plan.Its diverse designers specialize in community outreach that includes project websites,blogging,all social media platforms and working with broadcast,print and online media to gain key coverage of ongoing project developments. PlusUrbia is certified as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE) for the practice of Urban Planning Services in Florida.The studio is a Miami-Dade County Small Business Enterprise under the 21.0-Land Point of Contact: Use Planning technical certification of the Architectural and Engineering Juan Mullerat Principal-PlusUrbia Design category(SBE/AE Tier 2).The firm also is Technically Qualified in Group 1385 Coral Way,PH 401 13-Planning,for 13.6--Land Planning/Engineering by the Florida Miami,Florida 33145 t.305.444.4850 Department of Transportation(FDOT). e.juan@plusurbia.com 65 Perkins&Will 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team PlusUrbia - Urban Engagement • •*. • PLUSURBIA I I, '''' '' Development patterns of the past half century P .I , r t �. have created single-purpose buildings unable 1 ''' ' k ,`y � to adapt to changing times. 1 10 --- . li :, t Contemporary communities have been c' iitt r '-•.,. �' ti-, designed to require an automobile to � ,,,e; 3� �.. ,q accomplish the tasks of daily living. a s i r rx . ink. � �,. * PlusUrbia believes human beings are better -. i served by compact,walkable and efficient `m communities.We create technically advanced, yet simple design.Our design adds value ''' • __. �{ in its durability and flexibility to adapt to 4 : changing needs. .a >.,# t -' We promote neighborhood,city and regional a *�—.- x � . 1� ,,.--- ` , " ~ „� design that supports healthy living. PlusUrbia y , :' T. ,,e . creates vitality and value by studying cultural • DNA,listening to people and crafting a •' z ramework for sustainable living. 400. III1114rk : �� id Existing park programming:playground - ^ llt i.-- Y t: 1 facilities outdoor gym,recreational pool,etc. iJ Improvement of tree canopy for.increase to, l;• �_ of shade along shared trees to promote fi ,g l fet v; �- yS bicycle and pedestrian engagemenl l kf 11 ` e 1 ." l Iy -r.. Improvement of existing S River Orive in f f t' �' '', n� • order to connect and complete Riverwalk. "Otto, . ' & u. t rp i.. Propose exercise equipment i' " •,. . ` s `---__ ,F re >.. - under 195 bridge " , % ,r, � Water taxi dock extension. edges andwall extension for resilient Engagement of water edges edges pedestrian safety. Water taxi and kayaking ` Clockwise from Top Left: Engagement of water edges. Little Havana,Revitalization Master Plan; Little Havana,Revitalization Master Plan; (.7-'''..)Cel*) *Din - , .,.:-.„,, . , Hialeah TOO Master Plan and Transit Extension of river alk to connect to Oriented Development proposed Riverwalk along Miami River. Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team '1 141 li; Oil 11; Ili 1 " 1 „ , ., mIU 11 I� i li ry I4 „ . . ..,,.. ,„ ill lII1 �� 'I it Ylli h. ,A' k I _v. . 1 'h' , '"-11 I 1 II! 1 El ''''' t lirl ;It, a �. � ti, i jj 1;,-.4 -i. ll g 1 i „, r, _;; , :_a if f, $�, ii ', A4,7 ' - !.11N. 111.,t/ �.,, r v' �� wii i 1 ( i !1,' t ^� 1, 71' S 'IF k i <, , .I i _ , ..it; ° j --r ,'' !r^'r r- e_IN FI ' i.,, �4` ' +r4F4 ," w , Design Method Location Function Our diverse team immerses itself Understanding the fundamental Our experienced team uses a into a place's DNA to create a living qualities of a site guides us workshop format to collaborate plan rooted in location,context to create customized design one-on-one with the client and and function. solutions and implementation all stakeholders.Informed of the Thriving cities constantly evolve strategies for smart growth.Size, complexities of a site through research configuration,topography,zoning/ and public input,we develop a to meet rapidly-changing needs. land use entitlement, regulatory sound strategy for place making that We empower places to reinvent conditions,essential improvements enhances the quality of life for all themselves with plans for healthy and connectivity are studied and members of the community. dwellings,schools, transit,recreation, civic institutions and job-sustaining documented to ensure the project is commerce.Our design method fully viable. preserves the best of the past, Context addresses the needs of the present and creates a durable plan for a viable Our context sensitive design respects and adaptable future. the configuration,disposition and massing of the existing urban fabric and adjacent environment. This ensures that the best defining qualities of a place are expressed in revitalization plans,urban infill and new towns. 67 Perkins&Will PlusUrbia ! Team Resumes PLUSURBIA Juan Mullerat Megan McLaughlin Form-Based Code Principal Planning Leader seg 4114,�.�$ F • .p v.b a s` / / EDUCATION EDUCATION Master of Architecture Master of Urban Design Master of Architecture University of Miami University of Miami Bachelor of Art History-College of William&Mary Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies Bachelor of Arts in McLaughlin is a certified planner and urban designer who Architecture-University of North Carolina at Charlotte has extensive public and private sector experience in urban Mullerat is an urban planner and architectural designer planning and historic preservation in South Florida and with 20 years of experience.As founder and principal beyond.She has authored a variety of land use regulations of PlusUrbia Design,he has completed numerous form- to support and transit-supportive development in form- based code,land use, planning,complete streets,land based codes,comprehensive plans,traditional zoning development regulations and transit oriented development regulations,and masterplan reports. projects around the world.Mullerat's work has been • Wynwood Revitalization,Miami,Florida honored with national,statewide and regional planning awards. • Village of El Portal Form Based Code,El Portal, Florida • Wynwood Revitalization,Miami,Florida • Little Havana Urban Revitilization,Miami,Florida • Village of El Portal Form Based Code,El Portal, Florida • Coconut Grove BID Master Plan,Miami,Florida • Little Havana Urban Revitilization,Miami,Florida • Curridabat Master Plan and Form Based Code, Cirridabat,Costa Rica • Coconut Grove BID Master Plan,Miami,Florida • Curridabat Master Plan and Form Based Code, Cirridabat,Costa Rica Perkins&Will Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services PlusUrbia Team Resumes `♦` PLUSURBIA Maria Bendfeldt Andrew Georgiadis Associate Designer Project Director sync � EDUCATION EDUCATION Master of Surburb and Town Design-University of Miami Master of Surburb and Town Design-University of Miami Architecture Degree-Universidad Francisco Marroquin Georgiadis uses his design and planning expertise to Bendfeldt is an urban planner and designer who has improve the built environment.He has produced master worked on dozens of successful form-based codes and plans,transit plans,form based codes,visualizations, master plans both in the public and private sector. architectural designs,and transit-oriented development in Throughout her career,Bendfeldt has consistently communities around the world. He has co-authored Form- promoted and implemented forward-thinking land use Based Code and Master Planning projects such as the policy that emphasizes walkability and multi modal Bradenton FBC and the Seven50 Prosperity Plan. He resides mobility.Her expertise in urban design,land use planning, on the Gulf Coast of Florida in Sarasota and has extensive public involvement and conceptual design has been experience there and in towns and cities across Florida. honored with national,statewide and regional planning • Bradenton Form-Based Code* awards. Bradenton,FL • Wynwood Revitalization,Miami,Florida • City of Sarasota Form-Based Code* • Village of El Portal Form Based Code,El Portal, Sarasota,FL Florida • Rosemary Residential Overlay District* • Little Havana Urban Revitilization,Miami,Florida Sarasota,FL • Coconut Grove BID Master Plan,Miami,Florida Village of Estero Planning Services Village of Estero,FL • Curridabat Master Plan and Form Based Code, Cirridabat,Costa Rica *Work completed prior to PlusUrbia • Hialeah Transit Oriented Development,Hialeah, Florida Perkins&Will Village of El Portal General Planning & Zoning Services El Portal, Florida PLUSURBIA ff t£'31i;9Sr '� itxa; Client:El Portal,Florida '� � ;�"&` Size:256 acres f tp` � �� onv. Years of Engagement:2018-Ongoing j _ Contact: ` tfi ' .. zlr�� Christia E.Alou,Esq.,Village Managed"" • El Portal Village Hall •+ Y'" p ' „I,, .tea A TM 500 NE 87th Street ` El Portal,FL 33138 ' , 4 . 305.795.7880 � �} ", , ." , villagemanager@villageofelportal.corn I � :ym* Project experience by the firm RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Maintaining Character&Livability - - - Land Development Regulations • PlusUrbia serves as the Planning and Zoning Department for the historic Village of El Portal.Our studio oversees the process Knowledge of Chapter 163,Part II • -from major development proposals to permitting issues for single-family lots-to maintain the character and livability in Land Development Regulations • the subtropical oasis in north Miami-Dade County. Guidelines for Historic Districts • The unanimously adopted code will preserve El Portal's picturesque residential enclave while reating room for Codifying Community Design • economic development on land annexed to the Village. Urban Condition Landscaping The development site,east of the FEC railroad tracks near • Regulations Biscayne Boulevard,is slated for properly-scaled mixed-use development that will create jobs,services and tax base. Building Community Consensus • The code also created standards that will make the NE 2nd Streamlining Land Development Avenue corridor more walkable with incremental mixeduse • Processes redevelopment. I ' I' r-. / . r Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Hialeah TOD Master Plan & Code Development PLUSURBIA Hialeah, Florida 40,1„, Client:Hialeah,Florida s Size:313 acres g �"y 411 Years of Engagement:2016 - Contact: • Debora Storch,NCARB -` y ' Planning&Zoning Official,City of Hialeah ' ems'f41 501 Palm Ave. . 4 • 1 Hialeah,FL 33010 + r s*440ratto; '40*". 4111 305.883.8075 ,x +s r lat4447" dstorch@hialeahfl.gov Project experience by the firm Vibrant Lifestyle ` = , PlusUrbia created a master plan and , regulations for Transit Oriented Development ' (TOD)around the Market District and Transfer RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH rail stations in Hialeah.The master plan and regulations were unanimously approved by City Form-base Code+Resilience • Council.The design supports compact,mixed- use development around rail connectivity. Codifying Community Design • Affordable housing cuts household costs Urban Condition Landscaping • dramatically by being within walking distance Regulations of rail transit that connects to all of Miami- Building Community Consensus • Dade County's major job centers. Strong Graphic Skills • The Market Station District covers about 100 acres in area where stakeholders are interested in creating space for artists,events,restaurants and retail.Transfer Station has more than 150 acres that can support increased density,open space and a vibrant lifestyle connected to Metrorail and Tri-Rail. Perkins&Will Wynwood NRD • Neighborhood Revitalization District PLUSURBIA Miami, Florida MIA 1 t 01110 Client:Wynwood Business Improvement District Size:273 acres . Years of Engagement:2014-2015 " • Contact: r • rf ""'� fie. r' .. Manny Gonzalez,Executive Director 2751 North Miami Avenue,Suite3 If Miami,FL 33127 . '1*/ 786.615.8828 t v info@wynwoodbid.com 305.673.7080 Project experience by the firm N ate •��.,;�► Zoning Code Regulations ` � zk€l The Wynwood NRD is a set of zoning code ar ' x ` regulations that enhances pedestrian experiences, promotes diverse housing and RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH funds open space and centralized parking in a mixed-use,24-hour neighborhood.The Codifying Community Design • plan preserves unique street art and industrial Urban Condition Landscaping • characteristics while creating a framework for a Regulations dense,walkable urban development with new housing, retail and open space. Building Community Consensus • The plan and accessible code created by Strong Graphic Skills • PlusUrbia supports creative industries with walkable streets,transit corridors and green space.The NRD creates more residential development while also allowing for smaller units to serve millennials and artists with affordable apartments and live-work units.A Transfer of Development Rights Program allows warehouse owners to sell the development rights to their buildings-so development pressures do not eliminate legacy structures. Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Little Havana Revitalization Master Plan • Miami, Florida ..♦ PLUSURBIA Client:Health Foundation of South Florida `fix it,: r ;,p Size:1,700 acres lay.- Fi Years of Engagement:2019 `x:1 <. Contact: - ME - Lindsay Corrales,MPH trtl' Program Officer,Live Healthy Community Partnerships '- p Health Foundation of South Florida i _ • 2S.Biscayne Blvd. !I.,' ',;:' .xr v,`. Miami,FL33131 1 Y 4 ; r` 305.455.0339 ' "�.„ ,, a4/ Lcorrales@sfhf.org Project experience by the firm RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH Land Development Regulations • Maintaining Character&Livability Guidelines for Historic Districts • PlusUrbia collaborated with the Health Foundation of South Florida,the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Urban Condition Landscaping • Live Healthy Little Havana,Urban Health Partnerships,and Regulations Dade Heritage Trust to create a Master Plan for a healthier Building Community Consensus • Little Havana.The effort crafted a set of recommendations and designs that preserve the authenticity of Little Havana Strong Graphic Skills • while creating design guidelines for proper growth and development. Streamlining Land Development • Processes More than 1,500 community members shared their vision for Little Havana's future--including senior citizens,families, young people,business owners,activists and city officials. An online survey gathered more input for this initiative to retain character,density,scale and affordability in Little Havana.This work is an outgrowth of PlusUrbia's ..kt advocacy for a main street-complete streets approach to e. the pending FDOT redesign of the Calle Ocho corridor. + s a. %. ,.hY�M1e.-s.. 1;:i.4t, t.- ^�'v�a✓1p ar P k4 � ] ,tea }s.. "�tFtt .J ti 1m°n4P, a , 41.£ .k. 6 P%ti ':M... p''''''' 1�n�,IpR,[y—T"*"'u 'r�+4,11la �Ny'lp��t lV .'ny+1r V,'1 � ��' r�7.1�,6+Ce�. " PgpM�tiWY'i{�.L �'�'Ialyy°i�FsiaP N��y°��S �i�Zy �-a:� # J''.=,-a neo r �"�"^. ,2 �".w' `�l Yn ''}.1�y.1 #AY$t�w'Y;"` '�!�"';'r a- °,:..�'ai':,'5 3,�'w3'ha.�u:-' SA4'avr..n. d� 7e4a 44.X Perkins&Will 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer Team Coastal Engineering www.coastalsystemsint.com Coastal Systems International,Inc.(Coastal Systems)has an established reputation for planning effective strategies and delivering complex projects in coastal and other waterfront environments. For over 20 years,Coastal Systems has helped clients realize their vision by engineering cost-effective solutions in the design of civil works,environmental and habitat enhancements,public space improvements and other specialized projects.We have amassed significant experience in completing projects with unique designs and requiring construction under challenging conditions.From initial field investigations in hydrographic surveying and marine resource assessments through environmental impact assessment, regulatory permitting,design and construction,we provide clients with a field-to-finish solution. Coastal Systems International began as a small coastal engineering and regulatory-permitting firm in South Florida in the mid 1980's.Over the years,we have expanded our professional services to include: • Coastal Engineering • Site Investigations • Regulatory Permitting • Construction Management • Coastal Resilience • Waterfront&Marinas • Civil Engineering •• Marine Environmental g # t » • Destination Development y cz. i ' rX.• • A r • 4'h / <� y je'! -•4'I .rt'e� `;'r u4WM.n i'w�\M�'.e•`dA1Mt� � i� . ,0'-;....,.-=r1010"•'—'11111111141 � x; Top:Miami Beach Stormwater Management Left:Miami Beach Historic Resiliency Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Coastal Resilience -* RELEVANCE TO MIAMI BEACH Coastal resilience is the capability of a community to recover quickly after hazardous events such as hurricanes,coastal storms,and flooding.It Working for both public and private requires the proactive preparation for these events—rather than reacting clients,Coastal Systems has provided a to their impacts. vast array of coastal engineering services throughout the Caribbean and Florida. Coastal Systems works towards informing,preparing and designing the From initial field investigations to coastal community to be able to rebound quickly from weather and climate- process modeling with state-of-the-art related events,including adapting to sea level rise.Population increases software,Coastal Systems has the tools and larger concentrations of valuable infrastructure in high-risk areas and experienced staff to understand such as the coast must be taken into consideration when planning for coastal problems and provide cost- resilience.Coastal Systems recognizes the socio-economic,environmental effective solutions. and financial factors when designing for a stronger community. Coastal Systems'extensive experience in coastal and civil engineering, coupled with our agency relationships uniquely qualifies our team to assist local communities with the implementation of municipal and County coastal resilience plans.This includes aiding government with creating a resilience strategy,providing inundation maps,conducting sea level rise vulnerability assessments,performing storm impact studies, designing stormwater retrofitting plans,prioritizing adaptation projects and providing cost/benefit analyses of proposed projects.Coastal Systems is fully adept in providing engineered solutions to strengthen Point of Contact: coastal communities. R.Harvey Sasso Principal-Coastal Systems Coastal Systems has been working on projects to strengthen communities' 464 S Dixie Hwy, coastal resilience efforts with both public and private clients since 2010. Coral Gables,FL 33146 305.661.3655 rhsasso@coastalsystemsint.com Expertise 01. 02. 03. Water Resources FEMA Coastal Engineering The civil engineers at Coastal Coastal Systems has a strong Coastal Systems has developed Systems have demonstrated local reputation with Federal a strong capability in utilizing project experience with the Emergency Management advanced numerical models design and permitting of Agency(FEMA)technical to simulate coastal processes stormwater management plans analysis and regulatory at inlets, beaches and throughout Florida. interpretations. waterway systemst. 75 Perkins&Will Coastal Engineering Systems www.coastalsystemsin t.com R. Harvey Sasso, P.E. Andres Perez, P.E. Principal in Charge Engineering Lead .. :t rt1 k. is w s. ! t ` -'t- ti, EDUCATION EDUCATION Master of Science,Civil Engineering,Queen's University, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,Florida Kingston,Ontario,Canada,1981 International University, Miami,Florida, 2001 Bachelor of Science,Civil Engineering,Queen's University, LICENSURE Kingston,Ontario,Canada,1979 Professional Engineer,FL LICENSURE Mr.Perez has over 20 years of civil engineering experience Professional Engineer,FL in Florida. He has completed the planning,design and As the Principal-in-Charge,Mr.Sasso is responsible for construction administration for site/civil projects including parks,streetscape,and Right-of-Way.These projects providing overall management,direction and coordination to the engineering team for professional services related have also required the design of water and sanitary to all projects undertaken by Coastal Systems.Mr.Sasso sewer services. His site/civil design experience includes the permitting of projects through agencies such as the Florida has been involved in all aspects of coastal/marine Department of Environmental Protection(FDEP),South projects,including project design,engineering analysis, Florida Water Management District(SFWMD),and Florida environmental permitting,and the legal,political and Department of Transportation(FDOT). managerial elements of project implementation. He has a reputation for providing a business approach to • Miami Beach Stormwater Master Plan,Miami Beach, engineering having planned,designed and implemented Florida numerous coastal/waterfront development projects. • Miami DDA Baywalk-Riverwalk,Miami, Florida • 32nd Street Hot Spot Breakwaters, Miami Beach, • Beachwalk,Miami Beach, Florida Florida • Beachwalk II, Miami Beach,Florida • Historic District Resilience and Adaptation Guidelines, Miami Beach,Florida Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services www.coastalsystemsint.corn Adriana Cabrera Taylor Scheuermann Orestes Betancourt Environmental/Permitting Environmental/Permitting Civil Engineering r. fes ; , .q yf C° p.'" :""::::, .,' ' 3 e i . EDUCATION EDUCATION EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts,Marine Affairs and Master of Professional Science,Marine Bachelor of Arts,Construction Ocean Policy,University of Miami,Coral Affairs and Policy, University of Miami Management,Florida International Gables,Florida,2000 -Rosenstiel School of Marine and University,Miami,Florida,1988 Atmospheric Science,Miami, Florida, Master of Arts,Marine Affairs and Associate in Arts,Engineering,Miami 2016 Policy,University of Miami-Rosenstiel Dade Community College,Miami School of Marine and Atmospheric Bachelor of Arts,Marine Affairs and Florida,1983 Science,Miami, Florida, 2006 Policy,University of Miami,Coral Mr.Betancourt has over 30 years of Florida Coastal and Wetlands Master Gables,Florida,2015 experience in site/civil engineering and Naturalist,2014 Bachelor of Arts,Ecosystem Science has completed projects for a variety of and Policy,University of Miami,Coral sites including hotels,condominiums, CERTIFICATIONS Gables,Florida,2015 marinas,resorts,industrial/commercial FDEP Qualified Stormwater areas,and parks. He regularly CERTIFICATIONS Management Inspector coordinates with project consultants PADI Open Water Diving Certified,2017 including architects,engineers and Certified Floodplain Manager mechanical/electrical/plumbing(MEP) Ms.Scheuermann provides various Ms.Cabrera provides a range of to ensure consistent site/civil design environmental services to public services to public and private clients in with project requirements. He has and private clients in her role as her role as Environmental/Permitting provided civil design,construction Environmental/Permitting Project Department Head. Her responsibilities inspections,field surveys and planning Manager.She specifically manages include coordination with project layouts for numerous site/civil and projects involving coastal and teams and regulatory agencies relative permitting projects throughout South environmental permit applications to code compliance requirements Florida and the Caribbean. among other specialized regulatory for securing environmental permit approvals. requirements at the local,county,state, and federal levels. Perkins&Will Miami Beach Stormwater Masterplan Miami Beach, Florida www.coastalsystemsint,com Client:City of Miami Beach Size:4,200 acres `," . Years of Engagement:2010-2013 Contact: '" '' it Ms.Elizabeth Wheaton City of Miami Beach M M 1700 Convention Center Drive ' Miami Beach,FL33139 (305)673-7080 , ri ElizabethWheaton@miamibeachfl.gov Project experience by the firm SWMP : • fit The City of Miami Beach was required to develop a Stormwater Master Plan(SWMP)consistent with Miami-Dade County's Master Plan.Coastal Systems assisted with the update and —• p expansion of the SWMP,covering approximately 4,200 acres. The SWMP was intended to be a guide for improving the City's '"' stormwater management system performance for the next 50 years,with considerations to potential sea level rise over this Coastal Systems gathered boundary condition time period.The SWMP provided a preliminary schedule of values for mean high tide and 1-year tidal prioritized capital improvements necessary to allow the City's still water condition,investigated and stormwater systems to meet the increasing performance and researched sea level rise resulting from climate regulatory demands and modernize existing systems while change,and evaluated areas vulnerable to maintaining the high level of service expected in a modern sea level rise.A report was prepared outlining urban environment.The City's stormwater management this data,and Coastal Systems participated system consists of approximately 340 outfalls served by in the Master Plan public workshop to present swales,inlets,storm drains,culverts,bridges,gravity and the tidal boundary condition.The City of Miami pumped injection wells,exfiltration systems,channels,canals, Beach is in the process of developing a new pump stations,and retention-detention storage systems. Citywide Stormwater Management Master Plan,utilizing the team's findings. 64. RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH •ac ': * - -- -- - -- - -- --- • � _'_ Knowledge of Chapter 163,Part II • Southeast Florida Climate Compact • Land Development Regulations • Building Community Consensus • ,' rSte M. ,ta ,r.:a SUM! ?VW .'I :air. 78 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Historic District Resilience and Adaptation Guidelines Miami Beach, Florida Client:City of Miami Beach Size:City-wide Years of Engagement:2019-Current Contact: Susanne Torriente _. Chief Resilience Officer/Assistant City Manager 305.673.7010 SusanneTorriente@miamibeachfl.gov ,� Project experience by the firm „_, AWP, 4 www.coastalsystemsint.com Advancing Design Guidelines Coastal Systems,along with a multi-disciplinary team is working with the City of Miami Beach RELEVANCE TO THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH to develop guidelines and regulations for the Form-base Code+Resilience • renovation,raising,and/or re-purposing of historic structures in low-lying areas of the City Land Development Regulations • that are vulnerable to ongoing and increasing tidal flooding,as well as the long-term impacts Knowledge of Chapter 163,Part II • of sea level rise.The guidelines to be delivered Southeast Florida Climate Compact • focus on preserving several historic districts within Miami Beach,protecting the tax base Land Development Regulations • therein,and improving the districts'resiliency to increased flooding events.Coastal Systems Guidelines for Historic Districts • is working with the project team to create and • advance design guidelines and regulations,to Codifying Community Design provide best adaptation practices for property Urban Condition Landscaping owners and for development in the focus area. Regulations • Coastal Systems is also working to establish Building Community Consensus • an understanding of the Southeast Florida landscape,geology,topography,and Strong Graphic Skills • vulnerabilities to sea level rise. Streamlining Land Development • Processes 79 Perkins&Will Sustainable Futures Group Point of Contact: Sustainable Futures Group (SFG) is SFG is a multi- Michael Laos Principal-Sustainable Futures Group disciplinary consulting firm specializing in sustainable 820 NE 73rd Street, Miami,FL 33138 development, resilience, and technology. We are 786.423.7849 passionate about the work we do and the impact it has michaeLlaas@sustainablefuturesgroup.com on the world. We work with creative companies and organizations that are redefining the way customers, business, and nature interact. To every project we bring a powerful network ofchange-makers and visionaries that help leverage the potential of our customer engagement and deliver meaningful results. .. i -ate''_ - • t -1iv 'S . - sir s ,,. - J xx n y. 1 ' tea Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Michael Laas Community Outeach Michael Laas is the Founding Partner of Sustainable Futures Group(SFG)-a consulting firm specializing in Sustainable Development and Resilience. Michael has worked with governments and non-profits to realize their sustainability goals and maximize their impact.Most recently,the firm has consulted with The Miami Foundation and the 100 Resilient Cities program pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation on public stakeholder engagement surrounding the work of Greater Miami and the Beaches Chief Resiliency Officers.For several years he developed environmental impact statements for federally funded projects,including the planning and execution of public meetings. • Currently serve as co- Financing Green Climate Adaptation Resilient Greater Miami and the Beaches chair of the Resilience Stakeholder Engagement Communications&Public Engagement Task Force for ULI Southeast Florida/ Contracted by The Nature Conservancy,in Hired by the Miami foundation and Caribbean collaboration with the Harvard Kennedy 100 Resilient Cities as a member of the School and the Graduate School of Design, communications and public relations team • Currently serve on the to plan and execute a series of public to work with the resilience offices of Miami- US Green Building learning session and workshop in SE Florida Dade County,City of Miami,and City of Council South Florida and Tampa Bay Region on funding and Miami Beach on identifying,planning, Board of Directors financing green climate adaptation and and executing a series of community- Served on the City of resilience in Florida. centric meetings to generate support and • feedback on a comprehensive regional Miami Beach Design The event was intended to help local resilience strategy known as Resilent305. Review Board governments and key community stakeholders identify and apply innovative Previously meetings had been held within • Recent work with The methods of underwriting and financing the downtown core of Miami and on Miami Nature Conservancy coastal hazard mitigation,resilience beach but for this phase there was an and Harvard onand adaptation in the form of"green explicit effort to reach into the surrounding Financing Resilienceinfrastructure"projects,assets and neighborhoods of Miami and Miami-Dade Standards portfolios. The event was attended County in order to reach an audience that • Recent work with by several representatives from local matched the regions'diverse demographic and cultural composition. 100 Resilient Cities governments and members of the Southeast &Resilient 305 on Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, Project Highlights&Michael's Role public engagement for including the resilience offices of Miami- • community input on Dade County,the City of Miami,and the City Planned and executed the first 100RC Phase II of Miami Beach. event in Little Havana with over 30 attendees from the surrounding • Early work on numerous Project Highlights&Michael's Role community of Jose Marti Park PD&E studies and • Over 300 invitations distributed to all • Planned and executed the first 100RC NEPA documentations major Climate Compact Members and event in Liberty City, Miami's largest involving public elected officials African American neighborhood. engagement around project corridors • 92 attendees including CRO staff from • Sustainable Futures Group was the City of Miami,City of Miami Beach, public engagement specialist through Miami-Dade County,Broward,and the duration of the project Palm Beach. • Sustainable Futures Group managed the planning,organization and execution of the event. Perkins&Will Lewis, Stroud & Deutsch, P. L. Land Use Attorney Lewis, Stroud & Deutsch, P.L., is a law firm with a boutique practice devoted to the representation of local government in land use, civil rights, and general governmental matters. The founding partners in the firm together have more than fifty years of experience in the representation of cities and counties throughout the state of Florida, both as counselors to elected and appointed boards, and as defense litigation attorneys for the Florida Municipal League insurance arm and the Palm Beach County Sheriff. The firm is regularly called upon to represent municipalities in Dade County, Broward County, and Palm Beach County. Prior to forming the firm in 2000, the name partners practiced together in a south Florida mid-sized firm that represented, as general municipal attorneys, more than a dozen municipalities in the region.All attorneys in the firm are experienced local government attorneys with strengths in litigation, land use, local government, and civil rights law. The firm is dedicated to excellence in its service to clients and the practice of law. Ms. Stroud has extensive experience in the drafting of comprehensive plans and land development codes, as well as their implementation on a day to day basis by city administrators. Through her more than twenty five years of practice representing cities and counties in the many facets of land development, she has gained significant expertise in the solutions to planning and zoning issues that range from the routine to the most specialized. She has consulted in the preparation, as well as the agency review, of multiple large scale developments, including developments of regional impact. 11 �: Clockwise from Left:"" " b Broward County, Miami-Dade County it—,: ,: �� ., st w� Nancyled the localgovernment A - ...* ,., „,„:,,,..,,, land use department of a Ft. --,,,,„i.-i„ i , ” Lauderdale firm that provided , ,, ry - .. %A* . '- gip. representation as municipal attorneys for eighteen municipalities in the south Florida region. Ms. Stroud also has been involved in numerous urban redevelopment proposals, from her work as a community redevelopment agency attorney and as special counsel to city attorneys. She has been the board F tit � attorney for numerous Planning and .�c � ; � �' � � _ �" �� ZoningBoards and otherspecialized ' ,t ,� p I ° ,,. ..,r S� ,,4 p land development boards such as .� ,� �, �, „�.�,�� :::: DesignReviewBoards. Ms. Stroud.',,at0 maintains an active scholarship in �.., „, growth and development matters through hthe leading national herautlandorship useof treatisesoneof , and her frequent writing and lecturing on land development topics. Perkins&Will Nancy Stroud, AIA, LEED AP® Land Use Attorney Ms.Stroud heads the land use practice of the firm of Lewis,Stroud& Deutsch. She has extensive experience in the drafting of land development regulations,including form-based and other unified land development codes,as well as in their implementation on a day to day basis by municipal gx` administrators. Through her more than thirty years of practice representing ' . cities and counties in the many facets of land development,she has gained significant expertise in the solutions to the planning and zoning issues that range from the routine to the most specialized. She is familiar with a wide variety of zoning techniques to fit the specific needs of the local jurisdiction, from the most modern form-based codes to incentive zoning techniques, mixed use development regulations,and other modern adaptations of the standard zoning code.A significant percent of her law practice is devoted to the drafting and revisions of codes,including the modernization of comprehensive sets of land development regulations. Education Project Experience City of Lake Worth,Florida Village of Pinecrest,Florida Ms.Stroud was responsible Ms.Stroud prepared a J.D.and Master of The following are select Regional Planning,Law, projects that demonstrate for providing legal comprehensive set of land City and Regional Planning Unified Land Development guidance in the master development regulations planning stage. Following for the newly incorporated University of North Carolina Code Experience. at Chapel Hill the master planning village. City of Miami,Florida process,and after a lapse Bachelor of Science in Principal Legal Team Islamorada,Village of P 9 caused by the recession,Ms. Islands,Florida Sociology&Urban Studies Member for citywide zoning Stroud with the City staff Ms.Stroud led the legal Indiana University at code for the City of Miami took lead responsibility to Bloomington known as Miami 21. author the new zoning code team of the Village attorneys to prepare Professional Affiliations Village of Estero,Florida based on the results of the a comprehensive land Ms.Stroud has been the master planning process development code to Member Village Land Use Counsel City of Ft.Meyers,Florida implement the plan,and Florida Chapter of the since incorporation,and has Ms.Stroud assisted the to be consistent with the American Planning been lead legal consultant City of Ft.Myers with the state principles for guiding Association(APA Florida) in the preparation of the refinement and adoption development for the Florida Fellow Village's first comprehensive of the Smart Code for the Keys Area of Critical State American Institute of plan,adopted in June,2018 City's downtown. Concern. Certified Planners(AICP) City of Dania Beach, Town of Miami Lakes Board Member and Florida Ms.Stroud and her land Secretary Ms.Stroud in 2007- use team at the Village Form-Based Codes Institute 2008 provided drafting attorney's office assisted assistance to the City staff planning consultants in the Member,Amicus Curiae to finalize a form-based preparation of the Town's Committee zoning code for the city's first comprehensive plan. American Planning Community Redevelopment Association Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Nancy Stroud 3'' pq 1 .lig1, i P F i", 7 Ms.Stroud had a leading role as attorney for ss the creation of several unified development �`� c codes,including the City of Miami's award- '\\ winning Miami2l form-based code;the first codes for newly incorporated Town of Miamir F('�� r r, r Lakes,Village of Pinecrest,and Village of ,__,' igra P - II' - k....'4;')4::r . i e,- Islamorada;and comprehensive revisions of :;,, ,t - . r the codes for older,redeveloping municipalities ? - such as the City of Lake Worth and City of Ft. r, {t 1 '. 1'� t„ Myers.She is currently assisting in development :� -`- • \`.\ "; of the first land development regulations for - , the newly incorporated Village of Estero and '` �- _ is responsible for updating of the City of Boca '.ti +I -- - ,�" j � _rte \ , _ Raton land development regulations,and .:1 * „,A, A �', the City of Delray Beach land development 's \l l ---s..:--'��, ,, ,v\•!... .---,1. 11 _ 4, Potential Mixed Use-Vacant ti �, Y M1 +Y. r a: •� •iy.0 �- F �A `� r)[. .' -- Major Roads <, e ,;.,� {r, ' f ^I r , i + _ .., Rail Corridor ' r `� r; , .,,. 1 _ - � — 11 v :: LAKLS Ia 4.,, � — _ "'`f R i416 'Ail !� z.:. Wh rt„. n. Sf aE �. - .,. nils a.YN 1A I n t fi e'k Clockwise from Top Left: + `t.- City of Miami,Town of Miami Lakes,Village ofV.ry,,,,, F .: A'1` ' Estero,City of Dania BeachF , Ire ,. ,f. a - "3, -,..6 .._a miar ,a-,t.�: ;. „gym-.a.:, Perkins&Will Perkins and Will Team Matrix Collective Team Experience The multi-disciplinary team proposed for this opportunity has experience with every requested project area listed in RFQ 2019-209-ND as noted in the matrix below.Additionally: Nancy Stroud, our proposed Land Use Attorney has extensive experience with Chapter 163, Part II. Perkins and Will is well-versed in the Southeast Florida Climate Compact and its work products http://southeastfloridaclimatecompact.org/ TOcore Building for Liveability Study, Toronto,Ontario- Perkins and Will Atlant Beltline Corridor Design&Eastside Trail, Atlanta,Georgia - Perkins and Will Yonge-Eglinton Built Form Study and Davisville Public Realm,Toronto,Ontario- Perkins and Will Ludlam Trail, Miami, Florida - Perkins and Will Village of Coconut Grove Village Core Master Plan, Miami, Florida- PlusUrbia/Perkins and Will Resilience Strategies 1100 Resilient Cities Toronto, Louisville, Minneapolis- Perkins and Will Village of El Portal General Planning&Zoning Services, El Portal, Florida -PlusUrbia Hialeah TOD Master Plan&Code Development, Hialeah, Florida - PlusUrbia Wynwood NRD Neighborhood Revitalization District, Miami, Florida- PlusUrbia Little Havana Revitalization Master Plan, Miami, Florida - PlusUrbia Miami Beach Stormwater Masterplan, Miami Beach, Florida -Coastal Systems Historic District Resilience and Adaptation Guidelines, Miami Beach, Florida -Coastal Systems Miami 21, Miami, Florida -Personal implementation experience of Ana Gelabert-Sanchez and Nancy Stroud Participation in drafting citywide form • • • • • based code, incorporating resiliency with a population greater than Miami Beach Writing and implementing municipal land • • • • • • development regulations Knowledge of Chapter 163, Part II and other • • • • Florida Statutes Familiarity with the Southeast Florida • • • Climate Compact including Regional Climate Action Plan and Sea Level Rise Objectives Ability to develop land-use regulations that • • • • • • • • adapt a built environment in communities experiencing Sea Level Rise Experience with drafting and implementing • • • • • • guidelines for historic preservation Experience in identifying,evaluating, • • • • • • • • • codifying,and explaining the essential qualities of community design o' 3 w Experience with drafting and implementing o • • • • • • • • • • • T urban condition landscaping regulations z 0 C7.i 7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • Experience in building community concensus ,< n 0 0 0 n 0 • • • • • • • • • • • Strong graphic Skills 0 7 Knowledge in land development processes • • • • • • • and methods to streamline processes while maintaining high standards 0 Perkins&Will Page Intentionally Left Blank Perkins&Will TAB 03. Approach and Methodology Perkins&Will T _ Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Project Understanding ? ••z za �� 3 a *11 • ..,.. `e $,, ., `A Our Understanding resilience property assessment,elevation mapping,and freeboard ordinance Resilience and adaptation to change is part of the DNA of Miami Beach. Development over implementation that is already shaping the built environment. the past 105 years has occurred in the context of entrepreneurial growth,two world wars, Building on the Resilience Strategy,this project demographic booms and shifts,and most presents an opportunity to update the City's recently,the dynamics of a changing climate. land development regulations-regulations As the population of Miami Beach continues that are out of date and subject to piecemeal to tick upwards of 90,000 residents in addition amendments;can be confusing to interpret to thousands of visitors,the need for clear and and understand;can be overly prescriptive and strategic built form policy will be critical to do not address the current development and ensuring sustainable urban growth. resilience trends faced by the City.Additionally, there is an opportunity to update the codes The development of a form-based resiliency in a manner that addresses a building's code represents a workstream that builds impact on the surrounding neighborhood- on the climate science,adaptation,and the site context,public realm and pedestrian policy leadership in Miami Beach-one of environment-in a comprehensive fashion. the most unique municipal landscapes and coastal communities in the country. The Within the context of the Resilience Strategy's City's Resilience Strategy(Rising Above)is a urgent and ongoing collective action model, unique action plan that lays the framework the current assignment represents an for protection and insurance,waste reduction, opportunity to develop a comprehensive, conservation,and adaptation. Grounded form-based code that is the product of a in the work of the Preliminary Resilience robust stakeholder engagement process and Assessment,the Resilience Strategy responds serves Miami Beach's on-going growth and to significant sea level rise and storm related development.This process will need to address risks. Alongside other initiatives,the Resilience several strategic conversation areas: Strategy has opened conversations on 91 Perkins&Will 3.0 Approach and Methodology Our understanding: Resilience & Adaptation 1. Protecting and adapting the historic character of land activity. These trends,along with other development architecture and distinct neighborhoods industry trends in sustainable design and building,will inform the successful implementation of regulatory tools. While Miami Beach is a city a little over 7 square miles, the city is home to several neighborhoods with distinct 5. Creating an implementation process that characteristics and issues. The development of a form- streamlines investment and enables excellence in based code will need to strengthen different character community design areas-North, Mid,and South Beach-and integrate The new code will replace a code that has evolved over with existing historic preservation regulations. Together, the last 30 years through piecemeal amendments.By building performance,adaptation strategies,and historic streamlining and brining clarity to regulations,the new code preservation standards can enhance the built environment should provide for a range of housing types and densities.A for future generations. successful code will need to address affordability as well as 2. Fortifying and beautifying community assets,the practical approach to timing and phasing. pedestrian realm,and landscape systems 6. Collaborating in ongoing regional coastal resilience Where and how much Miami Beach grows has implications planning in Greater Miami and the Beaches(GM&B) for the system of bridges and roads that serve the city. with organizations,industry groups,and insurers,as Strengthening and improving access to community assets- well as other municipalities,the county,state,and the such as the hospital,parks,airport,and cultural institutions federal government -through built form regulation requires a comprehensive The environmental challenges of Biscayne Bay and along understanding of different systems,including community Florida's southern Atlantic coastline require regional anchors,the health of the public realm,and landscape responses that do not end at the edge of municipal systems that are the foundational fabric of the island. boundaries. This process has the opportunity leverage 3. Leading innovation on how changing demographics a network of experienced stakeholders,both locally and needs of Miami Beach can be translated into a and regionally. Stakeholders including neighborhood flexible form-based code associations,hospitality interest groups,and insurance industry representatives can contribute grounded We understand that demographics in Miami Beach are information on today's challenges,that can be knit together changing-household sizes are getting smaller and residents are choosing to age in place.The new form-based with regional data resources(e.g. FEMA,Army Corps of Engineers)to foster to local innovation. resilience code will need to respond to these changes in a flexible manner that protects the character and future of the For this RFQ in particular,we understand that the City of housing stock.We can do this by relying on recent research Miami is seeking the services of a team of consultants that and shifting expectations re quality of life and healthy will assist in the preparation of a form-based resiliency lifestyles.The new code will need to include standards code.This work will be organized around the following that promote accessibility and encourages each new major tasks: development to contribute to a complete community. 1. Mapping and Metrics Analysis 4. Responding to trends in the development industry 2. Stakeholder Engagement The development of a form-based resiliency code will need 3. Developing a New Code to anticipate and respond to the redevelopment of large sites,such as health care and convention center uses,and 4. Implementation will need to respond to shifting commercial land uses, including the expansion and evolution of entertainment 92 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Approach and Methodology Resilience in Action to - P •t. c . r -ttcusLune;.onatl, er i ,,tngandplanned - T. 3 R . cicrts to make Toronto people and neighbourhoodsbuilt environment. % 4S, I d f and den ion nutting proce:.e more rest o 3t rte- some of the cOy'sexes0ng to t t 1� f sa restbehce strategies and reg White most tackle many r Toronto tlemce challenge:each ' `,t 'j `t. ‘ i $ s i s d' // one rs associated with the ohetlenge ...Arch t has the bggest.aeao The Rexhence sbxtegy ) s{ t ' ,t ! ° j / deutan where them are gaps n these place_bray:a restbence tens to some of the trialing arork and e-�ty, N. yd` p{> e1' Intends to shape future plans coneng to Toronto in Ne connng years "o ,�y,. fit' £//. ,y wtrM' -.Prosperity'ToroMO Poverty Strategy 4y+,. « eOreOV TO prosperity:ac 0 00 that .unaruntoatyappr a v/'r ,,,-,va prey , '^r-:". ^"'°w,n�.... a ar�n v N s by CrtYf Am fiats to moire iap2oac2Y wen Wpernrcwtis;for all by `r ..: :,;::#!..7*--eM<"r,,._-•. 2035 Late the Rralence Strategy.4 tdenafies vrt.ry:ng trends thathow ( au.pe„ that;none dye,.have grown sg0baantly via the last so yoan ' 3 _. I and malas the case that .cannot be a prosper°.oh..0 one m five �wsnei'.' dtr"'' ,..1---- adv.and one n core ch+aerk.ng m poverty An ablated notion plat RESILIENCE ..__.w. C *s.• IN TORONTO -. ft.... ' ..:.__ . ell be presentedm tg ... I.Th00 to Plod saa.gy _- ____ � ...:...�__ "°ba^+,, t Food;Says a powerful risen prom°ng am.as 0etl as away strong am darse R._�.. lOaPtCfilliki - I CbrrnavVe potactrg the emaonnwn and•Lengttwrang the actuary The TOrvttp 0� nM00tr001 3.�- 'A�``.-, FOOD ,... ;Food Saategy.led tgT«°toPubecHealth emtomove the need-tosardoa •. .> `,q°t+y. _"b (1000r - food system that ponthst meritshmanandenvy. enalhealth0°lye *Y.'. aaaaaanl e`e . �,.'J Valk .I a1lh the go...yvaarnabnat naanal aryl tegi°ulrood rrooro.z4s and thenueriry .ecogne,°,of the.0p0•tam role as .a p.O,0*00,eathy susamaat food system aO'`. f r b b'"w N�ai; , �a�a nese��^ya movemetseae a rete re to a fwd system that oeazes deep...ares and I ,a' { f N.Baa 'n-0000 illy health adranmhm.x or cont.enden°road Oheawtd Tne Tend. firer 1.7 f"¢. .F'( ''t `�` " \ � 'odStrategy vex mi seG°at pproaah to Wad peaty internally at the Gly Stye( E e`d, . is f •` �' and to fact/tato nodab°aben a+di tri nap taw;to mcbsh change I f ? Y a lb r 3 ! \t‘I\ \\\,+a:ti % ..e lr stele r.is t,� � sf ,� i j 't `i�'t � E TanbrmT6s Toronto: :climavtlwen sttltegyt reduce Toronto rt /— strategy to reduce 1 geararoia.gwerncva.by Cot by 00001000000300330.1000. Oa local garb gas*nets...improve at,000105 grow nor ,00 2s .00roeas y end negro.tot dourly wa y The 0.e' .e strategy maims _ .ecar..wdahpre.to n.gra&obarcc nr me resarearae T.a otar .x gY 00ntng tl00-an tong-tern strategies in the 2020 to 0023 actmn plan „. e...rc>wx., May diMwed n tag T Planning for Resilience Liveability and Quality of Life Resilience in Action as part of 100 Resilient At Perkins and Will we believe that planning Our urban design and code work is developed Cities Toronto for resilience involves more than simply through the lens of'liveability'.Cities around tabulating the mix of shocks and stresses faced the world are competing to attract and by a community,followed by engineering a retain talent based on quality of life-and solution.Planning for resilience requires a the shape of our neighborhoods has a deep understanding of place,paired with a direct impact on liveability.As part of work community-authored vision that will guide with the City of Toronto,we developed an implementation.We intend to apply this Elements of Liveability matrix that organizes approach to Miami Beach's form-based the urban design components which support resiliency code.We will work with city staff to a high quality of life.This matrix can be weave together existing and on-going work employed when testing existing and proposed around resilience to facilitate the creation development codes and their impacts of a comprehensive,community-authored on residents and visitors.This approach vision that will serve as a basis for updates ensures that performance standards result to the code. This process will also allow in a net positive benefit to neighborhoods, elected officials to have confidence that development and the supporting public realm. their constituents understand the code and have achieved an adequate consensus on the proposed code changes.Successfully implemented,this process will create 'champions'amongst the public that will advocate for the code through implementation. 93 Perkins&Will 3.0 Approach and Methodology Our approach for Miami Beach. Performance Based Guidelines Analytical Tools Perkins and Will believes in a performance- Perkins and Will has also developed a based approach to the development of form- comprehensive suite of innovative,engaging based codes-one that allows for flexibility and accessible analytical,graphic and over time,while setting targets for high quality communication tools.We worked with 100 design,urban place-making,community Resilient Cities to develop a comprehensive connectivity,and economic feasibility.We will set of community toolkits;partnered with draw on our vast experience in shaping and community groups to develop an community enlivening vibrant,mixed-use communities led,open-source inventory of community across the globe to ensure that Miami Beach's amenities-tools that expanded the reach form-based code results in resilient,sustainable and feedback for both exercises.As part of growth that supports a high-quality public work for the Tunney's Pasture Master Plan, realm,ground floor animation,activation, we developed online tools that harvest social accessibility and enhanced ecology anticipated media posts to produce heat maps of retail by Miami Beach.This performance-based vibrancy on area streets.This approach allows approach will be aligned with the city's for a quantifiable evaluation of the retail existing standards and guidelines in an effort vibrancy of various neighborhoods. to optimize maintenance and operational considerations.This approach was pioneered by Perkins and Will as part of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan,refined as part of the Davisville Public Realm Study and formed the core the ii, :,;''':'1,:%.'7)''''T,, '-' a . i 1 - St' �3 , , t ,4 rte* t t i�llal 1 I Pour- ru. g t "' ' City's recommendations from the TOcore ou.EGE AKTa+ ' study,all in Toronto.The code developed 1 ..- -i:11-41.::: :''''''' y -i ' �� .r,,��' ' •Z yiv:'� t �_€§ r i , ., for the Lower Yonge Precinct successfully i rf* 4-q- .`-':_'- : I ...-i,-,-,,--.71,3,,,,„ � , ,y'� ' ' �{� t A P < accommodated high-rise construction,a ,- 1`'," ., E'`A&,'moo .• I.. 1 1t t -L. .t��J generous public realm and new community `; �'- zl * rr, 1. i '"..1. , ,.xs.. c" ,1 facilities and is now under construction. S t- i 4 'i,.."°"1`4,: ' . 1. I ? a ti`y,1�; �:`..�"'{t VEIN 1 ._ 0`i1�a9r lel-�.• _ '`.`r i "' `'V 'E�,till Rte . _ ' �E : I///Vi` t*' . ... i RDNT i , �.. r x 0...4. .,1 ms: 3 ti . Lower Yonge Precinct , r1• .14 .�.t S . • • •-"' • t, .,�� Pian Heat Map " �. • ..-,,A 7 :` rtaikal "'t' '�'.. '1 _ ' YSt. c i'�a '�'''—•— '.S' vo. t 94 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 3.0 Approach and Methodology • • • {�a.0 2 .,. �r1 f, ' IEGEND j. ;ate@ •w.•e Open swu. �• j':_•_••_ . , yam. x , 1 LIaC `` 1� i II?v �a....E .�Ea .� f f! k` r� ( sw.+rua.•b. `. 1 .. 7-'_ <o.t I I .!� .wm.Tru .;*C;, , l i =WA= –I C1WMb WM Vav • ��C I o Mtne..aoe Pm. •r..mree,r .. "n \ ! f7 YYe.......,.5-'. 6-,Enmwn- �w •:� ..gyy• .fir .1.,• .1 •-: o nam.m ron, 1. Mapping and Metrics realm and open space work to further without the ability to walk Analysis isolate key issues to be updated in to commerce,schools, the new code. and employment Prior to analyzing Miami Beach's This will be augmented by a • Artificially low supply of existing code,we propose mapping comprehensive mapping and affordable housing due to and documenting prevailing conditions and recent trends in the analysis of the existing codes.When the overuse of low-density built form through research and studying the current zoning,we zoning categories must ask ourselves:Where are there site reconnaissance shared by the After the mapping errors have been redundancies in the code regulations? City team.We use a rich array of identified,we propose a calibrated What are the mapping errors? How creative three-dimensional tools to map which seeks to correct those can we correct these?Where does the help analyze the built form for its errors based upon criteria that we code fail to address the community's environmental,physical and visual determine with elected officials, goals? Where does it fail to address impacts on the surrounding context. developers,planning staff and our latest knowledge regarding Access to sunlight in open spaces, residents. Our diverse team then economy,ecology,and walkability? access to sky from the public realm, studies how to simplify zoning districts, Often,as part of this analysis,we wind impact on streets,preservation both the number of them,and the take the existing zoning atlas and of views out and,views of the skyline complexity of the regulations attached translate some of the existing zoning being shaped,impacts on cultural to them. Simultaneous to this effort, districts into form-based code districts heritage resources,among others,are we analyze the redevelopment some of the base conditions analysis (the transect). In this phase,we still potential of vacant,boarded-up,or have not corrected mapping errors. we will engage in early on.These will underutilized properties and propose Mapping errors may include: be paired with the topographic and how to create zoning regulations elevation mapping already completed • Abrupt changes in allowed that are more agile and responsive by the City and data related to any height or intensity without to the market. In the future,these resilience assessments completed to suitable transitions could yield mixed-use developments date.We will work with the city team or medium and high-density • Lack of density near transit stops to identify priority areas for study residential development,always at a that are emerging from the public • Monocultures of residential human scale. Perkins&Will 3 H 4 iiikk3,... ..... •__.... M.!: N i. ,,......,,,..... --,:s.---- 12 IOW RISE BUILDINGS ..,...y. yo-.. .w I.. _,. .:�,_ `. }. Site and -+ Built Form Analysis — _ Development Street Design, Site Analysis Review Analysis Parking and Rewriting and simplifying existing sign regulations will help sharpen the After interviews with Planning MobilityAnalysis y City's identity while still benefiting Staff.Developers and Land-owners We will introduce best practices in business and wayfinding. For and Residents,we will study the parking configuration and ratios so instance,along streets that are more development review process so that that these are more in line with a pedestrian-friendly,smaller signs are the pathway to approval is clear walkable,economically prosperous, more appropriate when affixed to and predictable. This may include increasing the number of decisions and pedestrian-friendly Miami Beach. the building than larger monument For instance,streets with on-street signs which are meant to be viewed made administratively as well as parking may help to invigorate local by drivers moving at a higher speed. studying the thresholds by which businesses while naturally calming Signage should be tied to the intended public hearings are triggered. traffic in order to increase safety for use and visual appeal of the street and pedestrians through the concept of its customers and users. 'visual friction.' Complete Streets, which are street-specific cross sections and general street types will be included so that Miami Beach may replace auto-centric designs that have hindered the City from achieving its goals. 96 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services y A ,-f AI ,, tr 1 tl . . ._ j I 3 d , >iriami 74.e ... Coconut Grove Business Improvement District Stakeholder Engagement Meetings 2.Stakeholder Engagement Four groups need to be interviewed thoroughly. These are Planning Staff, Elected Officials,Developers(including real estate professionals and land owners),and Residents. Each of these requires a different set of communication methods.Interviews conducted with Planning Department Staff reveals what is difficult to administer in a code,which regulations are ineffective or generating unintended consequences,redundancies and other problems in a code which would be hard to identify without their assistance. Elected Officials tend to view code rewrites through a slightly more political k , prism,one in which controversy over development can please or frustrate their 4 constituents.It is necessary to identify in advance where controversy may lie ; so that they do not feel blindsided.Our team will rely on recent experience 1 X51. with the Miami 21 form based code to help City staff identify potential issues, , „h . `t ori together with engagement strategies that could help address or mitigate r ° .. _� � �1 negative impacts.Also, it is important that complex planning terms be made (l I\ simple so that elected officials can pass these along to constituents and Gaiter/ become champions of the code rewrite.Our team is well versed in translating ' ' CAF a< c, complex code issues into plain language and will begin this during the ;' 1,�f1CU6r1F y, ' .41� engagement process and refine language to include as part of the final implementation. r �:�4 With developers,real estate professionals and land owners,one can gather information regarding the'usability'of the code and which parts are helping them expeditiously develop properties to their highest and best use,and which are undermining their economic activity.Such insights are invaluable because the same problems that developers identify may be ones that undermine the City's tax base,which is important to the Elected Officials as well. 97 Perkins&Will 3.0 Approach and Methodology We must listen to Miami Beach residents who can , potentially feel left out. 1 We must listen to residents,who often feel left out of the ' e complex world of land development and who may resent r r? p >! developers for items such as gentrification,density,and I others which they perceive as undermining quality of life.We see residents as partners in this process-partners that best understand local impacts of development and best qualified �,, `-f4•I to advocate for the project through implementation.We often work with municipalities to empower and build capacity in .!. ,..iiiiii communities around complex planning issues,and can do the same with the City of Miami Beach.As part of Toronto's Above: Resilience Strategy,we develop Community Toolkits that Miami Beach Historic Trolley Ride allowed local residents to engage in conversations around the Below: project at a local scale.The Toolkits were distributed through Engagement Wheel-Resilience libraries and online;and a team of"Community Champions" were given a full day training session before fanning out across the city. Throughout the process we create open channels of education and communication with the residents,stakeholders,and decision MAPPING makers. These can include: ONUNE SURVEY • Workshops and charrettes LOCAL CHAMPIONS { nmtv+«,r.tt.ac'oo>Taonto • Social media • IDEATION `„ 0, TOOUQT Code website o.igned _mtimcYnrmr.wrth .. ., ioostcnanp,srs Community Toolkits 0 We have engaged 0 • On-site temporary design studios over 8.000 • Radio interviews Torontonians so far in O1('"� conversations about • Foreign language materials and sessions `.„ resilience in a variety of ways. • One-on-one stakeholder interviews WORKSHOPS AND STORIES OPEN HOUSES ( V/fu6 ca. sear.from nu., • Press releases Conal ttt,t&witlr V Jei esKYx,ts and stakehc4cte,: •+T Turcr+ta wpc • Questionnaires,handouts and surveys LIBRARIES MICRO-GRANTS • Public hearings and presentations M.cso g:M,ts to Noss ot,,.,,M,00:t Mot `"""'"`on pages 26 27 Through these methods,we can ensure that tm'W♦MJ iRlicAts rvUMTiroCR SEMMB£•t258 TELEPHONE TOWN HALL the code rewrite process is understandable and • ,;tit;•• transparent to all who may be involved. These seek to reduce conflict that may appear during , the hearings in which elected officials will vote , :, to adopt the new code. 98 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 3.0 Approach and Methodology 3. Developing a new code for Miami Beach . • +_. ^." - -- 'r `i 1 c f i i- "44111 Our approach to developing , !b a new code builds on typical approaches,refines them for �'i ---:;,..%, fast-growing and/or high • ,, density communities like Miami ,'- ->; ' `?t►w, Beach and augments them 'r''''; � wow Ali w 'AP °' with new tools that allow m' us compare neighborhoods with precedents and rapidly t < ,� �' • prototype alternative solutionic s a. • ' -x that support stakeholder i 4,,J " engagement.This is layered in with our approach to resilience ,* t ` and liveability,outlined e` above.As part of this work � � � �4 " a ,,,,,,, ,.:,.tiv,..: '-.1.1::::,'i''-1---4,111t* li,;'::.:''''''t''''''',:;i17:,,-::',1::::„:":"'-.:',..'' '''''':' we will employ the following methods and tools: x_ ; - RAP i ,.._..-- .... - • r-. � f roo . s � mss'. `5. 1.. ..".�". k gym. Perkins&Will 3.0 Approach and Methodology Benchmarking and Best Practices Computational Modeling Given our global reach and past work, The Computational Modeling process allows our team to generate Perkins and Will has assembled an multiple test fits that respond to the Design Objectives.Computational inventory of master plans,public realm Modeling primarily offers the potential to: designs and neighborhoods that can • Process a vast array of information and multiple complex serve as precedents,comparables and relationships that influence an updated form based code; best practices that could be applied to Miami Beach. Using our proprietary • Provide data-driven design solutions based on environmental tool-PlanMetrics-our team will have analysis;and instant access to this inventory and the • Generate multiple growth simulations via generic algorithms ability to test and filter across select metrics and criteria.We have applied This technique explores and exposes new front lines of conceptual this to recent work including Toronto's thinking and an innovative rapid testing which is iterative,to arrive at updated code for the King Parliament the desired shape and form.We will bring our creative thinking to apply neighborhood to compare relative Open- and modify our analytical tools to develop a clear set of performance Space ratios of various developments and standards for future development across Miami Beach.These will be then recommend appropriate measures applied to architecture, landscape,signage and environmental standards to mitigate adverse micro climatic that together make-up the form based resilience code. conditions.We have also employed Our prioprietary software can been tailored to the unique issues of Miami bench-marking practices for the TOcore Beach and allow our team to automatically test a series of variables(ex.: Building for Liveability Study in order to building floor plates,building heights or freeboard)against a set of fixed best establish key dimensions of public variables(ex.:FEMA base flood elevation),constraints(ex.:flight paths), streets and rights-of-way in an effort to and assumptions(ex.:land assembly).By generating a series of quick improve solar access.These tools could test-fits,our team can quickly identify key issues and highlight those for be employed in Miami Beach to organize further study as part of Workshops with the City team. public realm improvements that are tailored to the unique neighborhoods and their particular built form context. l"' ,✓ ,`( r .� '.,,iii...,- _r%�t yet K il. -3.'. ,r� {, J Ill r Iii r >, • _.-p E , t� fib. s/ .4�1I f, , . .I .•,,j _a i y; .. { do-;_ it ,' t> ;i'• , ,._, 9 ' f. 100 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 3.0 Approach and Methodology Public Realm Design In addition to thinking about variety and intensity of building massing,we will explore and refine approaches to the street-level experience to respect the emerging directions of the public realm study and promote liveability. The human scale is based on a set of dimensions that relate to the scale of a person,and these dimensions do not change.This scale applies to street-level design elements such as the number of entries along a frontage,the height Active s,p of retail spaces,the amount of transparency of the ground Uses floor façade,and the height of the streetwall. Different kinds of streets turn the dials on these elements differently;for example a busy retail street would have many more entries along a frontage than a quiet,neighborhood street;but they both need to have these elements,just in different combinations.These criteria could be applied to Miami Beach's historic neighborhoods and serve to quantitatively --------------------------- define neighborhood character and elements that we wish to replicate and promote. °k r 1 : t ub is a itv ,.. I{ � Ar I l ' 4 A' • 10, 11114 ' 1 101 Perkins&Will 3.0 Approach and Methodology EQUITY — GOALS FOCUS AREAS k 1. Torontonians'homes are more resYienC r6 '1 \ '2. Communities takcartion to improve res7tence in their neighboorhoods \ PEOPLE AND ° 3 T nto h d retires house lunons that ensure h CUMATEANDENVIRONMENT ^9� g R � NEIGHBORHOODS `�� ^t.'y1^' 4. Improve egwty and reduce poverty. 7s ��' �� w` gpy* '1:Toronro's more relit,ent to climate dWnge,inchiding the ha rd f °"�!' , . t^) y�t' � erg and heat. x CIVIC ENGAGEMENT r. a,.2 Infrastructure and huildmg knt tosathangngckmat and ?•-. upportrednttionmgree n ga -: INFRASTRUCTURE Toronto has mutt le re(wbk affordable,and safe mobtlItyoPttons Mat reduce the amount of time A lakor to get around ` COMMUNITIES AND % `^�` " y y 1. Civic engagement and t atm dtecoy improve,and our kadenhip better reelects Toronto's diversity. /\� 2 The CAy pr Rres the most vulnerable and".hestrisk HOUSING �lY i"°°ree< making. LEADING A RESILIENT CITY 3. Indigenous nemmundies have a leadership role in building resilience. ggg6. Im i,utional¢e resilience into the Chy's decoion maki g MOBILITY and take leadersh ip on resilience. 100 Resilient Cities,Toronto 4.0 Implementation Our team understands the importance of developing a document that is accessible and easy to understand for the general public.We will develop a graphically-rich, highly illustrated hybrid land development and zoning code with the City of Miami Beach.Hybrid elements(form- based regulations along with some conventional zoning elements)will allow Miami Beach to grow in a way that adds walkable urbanism while „ � ,•' allowing drivable urbanism to exist.We shall map parts of the city that ,N7Fk Resilience should receive the transect as well as other parts of the city which retain a RELi Ac tion t.rst Et Cradtttattieg, " more drivable or suburban configuration.Our team expertise also could '- provide Site Design and Architectural Standards for non-residential and non-single family detached developments in order to create a sense of place and identity for Miami Beach. e y 9 T � t . • A41t44�r� ltttew E h'rerA#wmro sa e � t rq > RELi Resiliency Standard Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Preliminary Work Plan for Miami Beach . At this time,we propose the following preliminary approach for community involvement,code revisions,and adoption,and look forward to the opportunity to review this with you in more detail. 1. 3. 5. Internal Kick-off meeting with Community Kick-off workshop- Focus Group meetings- Up to City Staff-during this meeting, held on a weekday evening. The five meetings with City Staff the project schedule will be Community Kick-off workshop /key stakeholders; meeting determined and initial planning will include an introductory participants and discussion will begin, including identifying presentation followed by an topics to be determined by data sources, dates and interactive, hands-on activity, City Staff. locations for public meetings, designed to gain insights advisory committee members, from the community on what and key Code revisions that the elements of the Zoning Code 6. City desires as part of the final could be improved. 1st Draft Code Amendments- Code Amendments. focus on relevant amendments to the existing Code, with a goal 4. of improving the clarity of the 2. Advisory committee - Creation Code and addressing salient Research and data collection; of an advisory committee, topics that are not adequately analysis of existing Code member selection to be addressed in the Code today, document and the built determined by the City. A series including the following: outcomes for which the City of four meetings would be held • Transit-oriented and stakeholders desire with the advisory committee development. improvements. throughout the course of the • project to determine project Sea Level Rise. goals, and to obtain feedback • Single-family residence on key elements of the Code regulations, including revisions as the draft document parking, garages,floor area progresses. ratio, and lot coverage 103 Perkins&Will 3.0 Approach and Methodology Preliminary Work Plan for Miami Beach . • The design and location existing Zoning Code. The 8. of driveways and parking Draft Code Amendments will areas, and the design of be submitted to City Staff for 2nd Draft Code Amendments front yards for duplex and internal review and comment. and Code Guidebook- The draft Code Amendments and multi-family development. the Code Guidebook will be • Parking requirements and revised based on the input floor area ratio. 7. received from City Staff. • Mediterranean 1st Draft Code Guidebook- architecture standards. produce an illustrated Code • Zoning standards and guidebook that will explain 9 the principles underlying the processes for constructing Community In-Progress mixed-use buildings Code revisions.The purpose of 9 Presentation - Meeting held commercial zoned areas the Code guidebook is to be used as a companion manual on a weekday evening at the • Open space requirements Coral Gables Museum or similar to the Zoning Code for use by and design for commercial venue to present the draft Code g applicants and Staff in order and mixed-use buildings. Revisions and Code Guide for to ensure the most accurate community feedback. interpretations of Zoning Code Although Code revisions will be provisions, in keeping with the based on rigorous"real-world" character of Miami Beach. The 10. architectural and urban designs Draft Code Guidebook will on real sites, the final product be submitted to City Staff for Planning and Zoning Board of the Code revisions will be internal review and comment Workshop - One Workshop to produced in strikethrough/ be held with the Planning and underline format to facilitate Zoning Board to present the easy integration into the draft Code Revisions and Code Guide for Planning and Zoning Board feedback. 104 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services 3.0 Approach and Methodology 11. Additional Services: information for determining Additionally,the followingwhat can be built on Commission Workshop One Workshop to be held services could also be that property. with the City Commission incorporated into the Work 3. Additional Meetings and to present the draft Code Plan, if desired by the City: Public Hearings, beyond Revisions and Code Guide for those proposed in this scope Commission feedback. of services. 1. Site Specific Zoning Code Revisions. A holistic, 4. Additional drafts of the thorough analysis and Code Amendments and 12. revision of the existing the Code Guidebook, in 3rd Draft Code Amendments Site Specifics, in close addition to the three drafts and Code Guidebook-The coordination with the City provided in the base scope draft Code Amendments and Attorney, to ensure that of services. the Code Guidebook will be all Site-Specific zoning 5. Companion Comprehensive revised based on the input regulations that conflict Plan Amendments, received from the Community with other provisions of if needed. in-progress presentation, the Zoning Code and and the workshops with the Comprehensive Plan are Planning and Zoning Board addressed. and the Commission 2. Creation of an interactive, web-based GIS application 13. for Zoning and other Land Use regulations. Public Hearings -Three public This GIS application may hearings (one Planning and include Zoning, Land Use, Zoning Board and two City Site Specifics, Historic Commission)for the adoption Designation Status, Flood of the Code Revisions. Zone, and other relevant 105 Perkins&Will Team Licenses Perkins and Will oledr STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN THE ARCHITECT CORPORATION HEREIN IS CERTIFIED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 481,FLORIDA STATUTES PERKINS&WILL ARCHITECTS INC 2 BRYANT STREET,SUITE 300 ATTN R.NEMETH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105 LICENSE NUMBER AAC0001B0 EXPIRATION DATE.FEBRUARY 28,2021 tin ys venry licenses online al MyRbrltlaLirense.com O.Y C7 Do not alter this document in any form. t7:J IL This rs your license.It is unlawful for anyone other Ben the Fcensee to use rho document. Licensee Details Licensee Information State of Florida Hain 2PERKINS YANTSTWILL STREET, SUITE ARCHITECTS INC{P.m.,.x. Main Address 2 TN:R.I IDI E H SURE 300 SAN FRANCISCO CNilwnia 9a105 Department o f State Courcy OUT OR STATE Ltense Mailkp: k.seLaotion: I certify from the records of this office that PERKINS&WILL ARCHITECTS INC is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State ofLicense Information Florida,qualified on December 29,1972. License Type: Landscape Architect Business Rank: Landscape Bus License Number: LC26000335 The document number of this corporation is 829284. Status: Current Licensure Date: 02/no/2008 Expires: II/30/2019 I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2019,that its most recent annual report/uniform business report special Qualifications Qualification Effective was filed on February 4,2019,and that its status is active. Corporation n2/04/20ne I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Alternate names RA R0l0SSF.515S. B.fyT9Matien. Yt9.w.uc9mce.Swan+ant Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida MILIDALWARBAnL.tenanrnn,auys- =.cammssv.,wussc.er .e,... ....,.. at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Thirteenth day yfMarch,2019 a' s !414/111*44— } cfair,v `- Secretary of State Tracking Numher 2894052009011 Tu euthen este this certili ate,sisit the foaming xite.enter this numbs:,and then faun the nent,dinna displayed. blips://aenacesaunbir.orb/FTIings/Certilie•eOtstahts/e'eriocateAuthenbcanan 106 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Coastal Systems Art AFRPF e ; STATE OF FLORIDA State of Florida BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS Departnlent of State THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS HEREIN IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471.FLORIDA STATUTES ly from the records oftine office that COASTAL SYSTEMS .'fERNATIONAL.INC.in a corp'DIltion organized under the bows of the Slate - 011101ida.filed on October 14.1994. COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC The document number of this corporation is P940000'5733, 464 5 DIXIE HWY CORAL GABLES FL 331460000 I Whet certify that said cftpiratitn has feud all feed:due Ibis office IbnmpIl December 71,2019.that its mon recent annual report/uniform business repro SSW filed on January 30.2019.and that its meths is active. `. LICENSE NUMBER CA7087 EXPIRATION DATE:FEBRUARY 28.2021 I bather certify that said corporation lout tot filed.lnicles ofDiss.die i.m. Aannn rrnry xe,nr"�nnrr m,a:,,,.a,.l ;nn O Do not alter Imt 4ncmnew ,n,form_ TM is now i,[mse It os unlawful!or anyone other than the licensee to use tnn document. ,..oder iqr fund anal the ......_._ __.. .. ..._. .. .._.._.__.._.,..._.__._.. ._.. (treat S:ufafar Swfr f27oeMw nr/NhAaner,the Capita/,6/E bnearw.M.fms Ike rw6niraJay'ofJwrhtun.:2019 FBI)! STATE OF FLORIDA J' r' 04�ia . BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS .4 ` ,5('fl'PI(/CI'(�.)�/1f(' THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471.FLORIDA STATUTES NutoIrrr-666.6202-f t. To su,fna kale Ibis mtilnaIr,,Iut the foliwa*shoran su<Uoote,,and owns s, Wercthe 111...111.1).,1a,4' SASSO,RONALD HARVEY Imps...oeryket.nmla.erq rllegarrrtnrat.orswn.,[-.nnraternmrmhm:. C!O COASTAL SYSTI MS INT't.2ND 464 SOUTH DIXIE HWY MIAMI Ft 3314600(0 i.._R LICENSE NUMBER.PE35616 EXPIRATION DATE FEBRUARY 28.2021 Nara,"ratfr 6cens.s online at MYFMx4YLhense.<rm T•}r"t0 n 3 Do not alfa this document in any form. jt fJJry This is your license,It is unlawful for anyone other than the I;rensee to use this document IFBP} STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIQNS OF CHAPTER 471,FLQQBDA 5TZATIJTFS Eopt ,,j PEREZ,ANDRES r' 4662 NW 107TH AVE APT 1907 008AL FL 33178 LICENSE NUMBER.PE66507 EXPIRATION DATE:FEBRUARY 28,2021 Always verity heroes ontme at Myrlo,Idaleema<om fir, Do not alter this document N any form. s This is your license.n is unlawful for anyone odd.than the licensee to use this document. a 107 Perkins&Will Team Licenses PlusUrbia Megan McLaughlin,A1CP State of Florida Department of State r:.,rt I certify from the records of this office that PLUS URBIA,LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida,filed on January 11,2010. The document number of this limited liability company is L10000003286. I further certify that said limited liability company has paid all fees due this office through December 31,2019,that its most recent annual report was filed on February 8,2019,and that its status is active. Nancy Stroud Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida / \ at Tallahassee,the Capital,this the Eighth day of February,2019 The Florida Bar 1 �� acct r..r ae. �'4Y TallaYaee,Fl7.%Gal2.1110 Joshua l=Doyle 115015141-5e00 I��,' �,� Ereaahe Director State of Florida 1 FlR.... ARIDABAara S • Secretary of State counq of Leon 1 N Re:0278564 Nancy Ellen Stroud Lewis,Stroud&Deutsch 1875 NW CORPORATE BLVD STE 100 Tracking Number:0671228911CC BOCA RATON.FL 33431-8550 I CERTIFY THE FOLLOWING: To authenticate this certificate.risit the follow ing site,enter this number,and then Mon the instructions displayed. I am the custodian of membership records of The Florida Bar Flips://uryices.sunbio,org/Filingr/Ce tilllcateOiStahr/Cerlif a teAuthenikation Membership nxords of The Florida Bar indicate that The Flood.Bar member listed above was admitted hr - _— practice law m the gate of Florida on August 29,1979. The Honda Bar member above is an active member in good standing of The Florda Bar oho is eligible to practice law 0 the gate of Florida. Dated this 18t11 dot of J.iv,2019. CGithia B Jackson,CFO Administration Division1 i u,f; ' The Florida Bar } PG:RIO AV41 /'t CTM-50283 108 Miami Beach Resiliency Code Consultant Services Gelabert-Sanchez,LLC Sustainable Futures Group Electronic Articles of Organization L12000075504 For FILED 8:00 AM June 06 2012 Florida Limited Liability Company Sec.Of State Hampton I)t l 1 Articlel Th e risme of the Limited Liability Company is; ✓_'` r,.i OELABERTSANCIIF7,.LLC ;aisainariaiaar Article Il Detail by Entity Name The street address of the principal office of the Limited Liability Company is: 411 AL GAB ROAD Florida Limited Liability Company CORAL(i.U3LE.5,F7..US 3314(• SUSTAINABLE FUTURES GROUP LLC 018091N9rnwttnn The mailing address of the Limited Liability Company is: Document Number L16000180092 4t1 IIARDFE ROAD COR.IL GABLES-FL.US 33146 FEIIEIN Number 81-3999385 Date Filed 09272016 Article Ill State FL The purpose for which thin Limited Liability Company is oepani7ed is; status ACTIVE ANY AND ALL LAWFUL BUSINESS. Last Event REINSTATEMENT Event Date Filed 05/172018 Principal Address Article IV 820 NE 73RD STREET The nine and Ronda slrixt address of the registered agent is, ANA NI(iELABEKI' MIAMI,FL 33138 411 t1ARDE6 ROAD MM809Amreas CORAw.GABLES,FL. 33146 820 FE 73RD STREET Having been named as registered agent and to accept...nice of process lin Bre aMrve slated limited MAW FL 33138 liability company at the place,designated in Sus certificate.1 meets,accept the,appointnteet as reglstad Reglateta9AgerlINaote tAddresa aspmt and ape.to act in this capacity.I Ibnher arra:to complyly diedie'lit provisions all statutes rating to Me ranger and Ivanploto porlonnani v ol'mv dote.and I am Iamdiarnilh and accept It,, LAAS.MICHAEL obliaalunu of my position as rsxlshzcd agora. 820 NE 73RD STREET Regis/rd Agent Signature: ANA Ni.GELABERT MIAMI,FL 33138 Name Changed.05/172018 Authvrize9 PetspnlalDetail Name 8 Addreu Title AMBR OAS.MICHAEL 820 NE 73RD STREET MAMI,FL 33138 Tale AMBR Law,MARCIA Martinez 820 NE 73RD STREET MIAMI,FL 33138 109 2800 Ponce De Leon Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33134 Perkins&Will