2003-25410 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-25410
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF $67,500 IN
CONCURENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DETERMINE THE REMAINING
AVAILABLE CAPACITY IN SANITARY SEWER PUMP STATIONS 1 AND 31;
THE RESULTING REPORT WILL AID IN THE REVIEW OF THE CURRENT
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD FOR SANITARY SEWER, USED IN THE
CITY'S CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
WHEREAS, the South Beach area of Miami Beach is presently undergoing significant
growth and redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, this area south of Dade Boulevard is primarily served by two large sanitary
sewer pump stations (PS) PS-1 and PS-31; and
WHEREAS, the City's Concurrency Management System (CMS) requires that the
infrastructure capacity be made available concurrent with the new development projects;
and
WHEREAS, the CMS computer model is reporting failure in the sanitary sewer capacity
south of 5th Street; however, the Public Works Department has not yet seen any physical
evidence of such failure in the infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, to resolve the difference, a Review of the Sanitary Sewer System
(estimated to cost $67,500) is needed to determine the remaining available capacity, if any,
in the above-mentioned pump stations (the Study); and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to utilize Concurrency Administration Fees to fund such
Study, since its resulting report will aid in the review of the current level of service standard
for sanitary sewers, used in the CMS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby
authorize the appropriation of $67,500 in Concurrency Administrative Fees to conduct a
Review of the South Beach Sanitary Sewer System in order to determine the remaining
available capacity in Sanitary Sewer Pump Stations 1 and 31; the resulting report will aid in
the review of the current level of service standard for sanitary sewer used in the City's
Concurrency Management System.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 25th
,2003.
~~~
C TY CLERK
F:IWORK\$TRAIAMELlAICONCURRENCYlAdminFeeAppropriation.doc
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
1It1~
c ...
CITY OF MiAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
~
"'!!iiiiiiiiiF
Condensed Title:
A Resolution authorizing the appropriation of $67,500 in Concurrency Administrative Fees to determine the
remaining available capacity in sanitary sewer pump stations NO.1 and No. 31. The resulting report will
aid in the review of the current level of service standard for sanitary sewer used in the City's Concurrency
ManaQement System lCMS).
Issue:
Shall the City appropriate Concurrency Administrative Fees to fund a review of the sanitary sewer system
in South Beach?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
The South Beach area of Miami Beach is presently undergoing significant growth and redevelopment. This
area south of Dade Blvd. is primarily served by two large sanitary sewer pump stations (PS), being PS-1
and PS-31. The City's Concurrency Management System (CMS) requires that the infrastructure capacity
be made available concurrent with the new development projects. The CMS computer model is reporting
failure of the sanitary sewer system capacity south of 5th Street; however, the Public Works Department
has not yet seen any physical evidence of such failure in the infrastructure. To resolve the issue, a study
needs to be conducted. A scope of services and cost proposal are included in this Agenda Item.
The Administration proposes the appropriation of $67,500 in Concurrency Administrative Fees to conduct a
Review of the South Beach Sanitary Sewer System to determine the remaining available capacity in PS-1
and PS-31 , above-mentioned. It is an appropriate use of the funds, since the resulting report will aid in
the review of the current level of service standard (LOS) for sanitary sewer used in the CMS. Since the
implementation of Concurrency Administrative Fees in April 2001, the fund has collected $185,924 to date.
The study will be conducted under Service Order NO.4 to Camp Dresser & McKee, pursuant to an existing
Professional Services Agreement with the City for Engineering Services/Sewer System Improvements.
The Administration recommends approval of the Resolution.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
IN/A
Financiallnfonnation:
Source of
Funds:
Approved
D
Finance Dept.
City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking:
I Amelia Johnson
F:\WORK\$TRAIAMELlA\CONCURRENCYlAdmFeeApprop.CIS.doc
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
C7P-
11-~-03
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To:
Mayor David Dermer and
Members of the City Commission
Date: November 25, 2003
From:
Jorge M. Gonzalez "..~
City Manager 0 ~ 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF
$67,500 IN CONCURRENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DETERMINE
THE REMAINING AVAILABLE CAPACITY IN SANITARY SEWER PUMP
STATIONS 1 AND 31. THE RESULTING REPORT WILL AID IN THE
REVIEW OF THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD FOR
SANITARY SEWER USED IN THE CITY'S CONCURRENCY
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
Subject:
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution
ANALYSIS
The City of Miami Beach currently operates a system of manifold pump stations that
transfer wastewater generated from the City and its four satellite customers to the Miami-
Dade Water and Sewer Department's Virginia Key Regional Facility. The capacity for
receiving and pumping wastewater flow at each station is a finite quantity, based on the
size of the pumping equipment and the condition of each pumping station.
The City is presently undergoing significant growth and redevelopment in the South Beach
area. This area south of Dade Boulevard is primarily served by two large pump stations
(PS): PS-1, located south of Flamingo Park; and PS-31 south of 3rd Street.
The City's Concurrency Management System (CMS) requires that the infrastructure
capacity be made available concurrent with the new development projects. The CMS
computer model is reporting failure of the sanitary sewer system capacity south of 5th
Street; however, the Public Works Department has not yet seen any physical evidence of
such failure in the infrastructure. To resolve the difference, the remaining available capacity
in PS-1 and PS-31 needs to be determined.
At the City's request, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. prepared the attached scope of
services and cost proposal to perform a Concurrency Review of the South Beach Sanitary
Sewer System. The Administration proposes to utilize $67,500 in Concurrency
Administrative Fees to fund the study, since the resulting report will aid in the review of the
current level of service standard for sanitary sewer, used in the CMS.
November 25, 2003
Commission Memorandum
Concurrency Admin. Fees for Sewer System Review
Page 2
The Concurrency Administrative Fee fund (collected when automated Concurrency
Statements are run for prospective development projects) is the appropriate source to fund
studies such as this, since no Concurrency Mitigation funds have been collected for
sanitary sewer purposes to date. In addition, Concurrency Mitigation funds should be
reserved for the implementation of projects andlor programs required in order for certain
development, redevelopment andlor use intensification projects to proceed. The City has
collected $185,924 in Concurrency Administrative Fees to date (ApriI2001-0ctober 2003).
Camp Dresser & McKee will be issued a Service Order No. 4 to conduct the study,
pursuant to an ongoing Professional Services Agreement (Engineering Services for
Citywide Sanitary Sewer System Improvements) it has with the City. It will take
approximately four months (120 days) to prepare and submit a draft report for the
Concurrency Review of the South Beach Sanitary Sewer System.
The Administration recommends approval of the Resolution.
JG/RM/FB/AJ
Attachments: Service Order No.4 to Camp Dresser & McKee
Scope of Services for the ReviewlSoBe Sanitary Sewer System
Cost Proposal
F:IWORK\$TRAIAMELlAICONCURRENCYlAdminFeeAppropriation.doc
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CAMP DRESSER & McKEE, INC.
Service Order No.4 for Professional Engineering
TO:
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 710
Miami, Florida 33131
(.;1
"'''"
,
, '1
DATE: August 12,2003
rn
<,.
-
~ C~)
Pursuant to the Agreement between City of Miami Beach and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
(Consultant) for Professional Services for Citywide Sanitary Sewer System Improvements
Project ("the Agreement"), you are directed to provide the following services:
Project Name: Currency Manaeement Review IPS 1 and 31)
Scope of Work: Attached
Calendar days to complete this work:
Estimated Construction Cost:
Fee for this Service Order:
120 days (draft report)
N/A
$67,500 Lump Sum
The above fee is a lump sum amount to be billed monthly based on the percentage of completion
method.
Basic Service
x
Additional Service
Reimbursable Expense
ACCEPTED:
City of Miami Beach
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
Fred H. Beckman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Date
Victor J. Pujals, P.E., DEE
Vice President
Date
N:\KM11"7.doc
15/15/2003
SERVICE ORDER NO.4
SCOPE OF WORK
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT REVIEW
BACKGROUND
The City of Miami Beach currently operates a system of manifolded pump stations that transfer
wastewater generated from the City and its four satellite customers to the Miami Dade Water
and Sewer Department's Virginia Key Regional WWTP. The capacity for receiving and
pumping this flow at each station is a finite quantity based on the equipment at each pump
station and the conditions that each station is required to meet at that time. Determining the
flow that the station serves or is committed to serve and subtracting that from the actual
capacity can determine the amount of capacity remaining to serve additional flow. Ensuring
that the transmission system has the capacity to serve the growth in an area is an important
statistic for the City to monitor.
At the present time, the City of Miami Beach is undergoing significant growth and
redevelopment in the South Beach area. This area south of Dade Boulevard is primarily served
by two large pump stations (No.1 and No. 31) as located in Figure 1. The purpose of this scope
of work is to determine the remaining available capacity in these two pump stations. This
project will serve as a model for determining the available capacity in the remainder of the
City's wastewater pump stations.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 - Data Collection
The primary source of data for this task is the City of Miami Beach Gravity Sanitary Sewer Flow
Capacity Analysis _ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (KHA). The purpose of this task is to update
the anticipated flows in this report for Basin 1 (Pump Station No.1) using the latest data from
the City's Planning Department. In addition to compiling the land use data and information on
proposed and approved developments, Consultant will review the latest record drawings for
both pump stations to determine the extent of the gravity sewer system that ties into each pump
station. This area or sewershed may include other smaller lift stations with collection systems of
their own. The analysis of the record drawings will include a determination of the possibility of
an interconnection between the area served by PS 1 and PS 31. This will be based on the
proximity of service areas, manholes, and depth of the facilities. Consultant will also collect
operating data from each pump station (run times, pressure and flow data) to determine the
current amount of usage at each pump station.
Task 2 - Analysis
Consultant will construct tables listing the DERM recommended flow for each land use as
defined by the County Land Use Code (CLUq. Consultant will analyze the projected build-out
flow for each sewershed based on the anticipated build-out from the Planning Department
permitted projects and current land uses. Consultant will determine a peak flow to each pump
station based on the average daily flow calculated for each sewershcd. This number will be
4 - 1
N:\J<M1140.doc
8/1512003
c
-.
>-
V1
::l
""
~
N
ci:i
PUMP STATION NO.
AND SERVICE AREA
"'
o
o
N
<Xl
o
..,
o
"-
"'
"-
<Xl
o
PUMP STATION NO. 31
AND SERVICE AREA
~
"
o
.0
-;;;
c..
I
CD
;l;
,/
!1
o
'3'
c..
-&
o
o
o
,/
c.:
1" = 1500'
....__- I
750 0 1500
COM
Figure No.1
PUMP STATIONS PS1 AND PS31
AND SOUTH BEACH AREA
verified by the run times and flows recorded at each station. This peak flow will then be
compared against the peak flow capacity of each pump station as determined by the force main
hydraulic model. A comparison will be made for the current stations and the stations once the
upgrades have taken place (including the South Point Booster). The results of the analysis will
be reported as a percentage of utilization.
Task 3 _ Evaluate Options for Interim Capacity
Consultant will determine the feasibility of a gravity interconnection between the two
sewersheds as an interim flow balancing measure until the pump station are upgraded.
Task 4 - Prepare Draft Letter Report
Consultant will prepare a letter report setting forth the assumptions, calculations, findings, and
recommendations from the concurrency management review. The report will present the
percentage of each pump station that is being utilized for present future conditions. Consultant
will provide the City with five copies of the draft letter report for review.
Task 5 - Review Meeting with the City
After City Staff has reviewed the draft letter report, Consultant will meet with staff to discuss
any review questions or comments concerning the draft prior to finalizing the report.
Task 6 - Prepare Final Letter Report
Consultant will prepare the finalleUer report incorporating the questions and comments
concerning the draft. Consultant will provide the City with 10 copies of the final letter report.
SCHEDULE
Upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) and of all the required data, Consultant will
complete and submit within 120 calendar days the Draft letter report (five copies) for review as
described in this Service Order. The Final letter report (10 copies) will be submitted within 21
calendar days of receiving the City's review comment.
PAYMENT AND COMPENSATION
Compensation for this effort will be a Lump Sum amount of $67,500 as calculated on the attached
worksheet. Invoicing will be monthly based on the percentage of completion method.
DATA TO BE PROVIDED BYTHE CITY
. Current Parcel map (GIS shape file)
. Zoning (electronic data file)
. Land Use (GIS shape file)
. Future Land Use (GIS shape file)
. Access to the Sewer Atlas and Record Drawings for the PS 1 and PS 31 service areas.
4-3
N:\KN1140.doc
1l/1512003
B
!I
~ H .. ~ iijH:i5 3: ::! .. ~ ~ ~ 5 .. .. ;:: :;: .. ~
;J; .. ~ 5 ;:: t:: i '"
. .
.,; . :i \Ii r.: r.,. N .,; !:! ::l ,.; .. '" ~.
'3 ~ ~
,2 ....'" .. ",1ft""'" .. '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. '"
.. ..
'3 ~ ~r;;gg: ~ ~ :Ii ;\ ~ 8 8 ~ g ~ 8 ~I~
. ~ ~:! :l! 0 ~ ~ ::! ~ ~ . ,,,,'N ---~.
o 0 <- .. . <- ~.,.IIt""""""IIt"'~"""'~ ..
"'': Ul
::l
~ ~ ,,88888;l18888
::! .. " ;! ;! $ 0 0 .. l:l ;! := Q~=.o~~cist-~ro;
~ ~ ~
;Ii s
ii lit lit lit lit 1ft 1ft lit ",..,."'1It U
~f '2 ::i i
~ 0 0" .. COCCI 0 ;! ;! 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. is
i!:CIC. ~ !
-;
.: ~ E! '"
.0 = lilll " 0 ~ ~ :< " $ . .. .. .. !i\ <I lIP '. <I <I <I <I <I <I <I '3
.:!.- l""l . . .. .. 0 is'
~~r;; .. .,;
... ,
Ul
i ::!
'" ..
<- ,,"0 " cocCi 0 0 .. l'l II 0 .. .. .. 5i .. 8..-:;: N:RNO =
'.. ~ ..
. .. N .. N !::.
"' .
Il
i ~ f 5 ~ t to 2! l'.t i
~ l
".. ,.; "" " .. "" " l'l i! " .. .. $ .. .. .. .. E.i -'1 l!.; ~ j {.a .3 ":
. 0 .. - N .. " is
"' :;; e..= e '; -il i '3
.Ii '" 0
...
is,!il .l'l III " " " .. ;! :!i ;! ..
, :! ~ N .. - .. .. .. . .. ..
ct i v; . ~
~ . 0
- is ~ jj '"
!l 1 .
H "! :!i .. , ..
;;; ,,"N .. MNNN .. .. .. .. N .. ~ .. ~ .
!ts :;; e ,
.. <5 ... .
~ ~
..
4
..
~
a
i
c
!
o
..
.,;
~
4
...
'3
o
..
,
Ul
~
..
.:!
i
~
1
-=
~
.
..
~
..
"
.;
..
.,;
..
~
'3
s
...
,
'"
"
.
..
~
'3
s
'"
.
Ul
"
~
~
,:
.
i
..
.
'"
~
..
=
...
'3
o
..
.
Ul
1;,
'~
3'
!1
!i
oS
"
.s
~
.
'"
5
..
4
~
>
"'
o
..;
i'
e -j
~ 0 .
~ i ~
.. 4 "
i!i .. 0
..~ ~
'a r~
c '2 ..
.:.&~
~,n
==Ji
'j 'j "
- - ~
H~
"
..
~
'3
s
-=
'^
,
:2
~
i i
.a Ii
Hd
,: ~.: ~
~ I ~ c..
.sJl~e
~ ! ~ ~
!! '@ ~
~U]
"
,,;
~
iJ
~
"
&.
.:!
jj
.3
,:
j
..
o
."
~
"
..
~
.c
!
.- ..
a "
,~ ~
:l-
_ 0
.. !!.
5~
"
.~
oS_
q
11 4
..-
~ ..
. z
::Ii 2
"0
~"
~~
. ...
~ e
o .
U"
~
...
'"
~
...
'"
~
'"
~
...
'"
~
...
'"
~
...
'"
::2
...
o
.
'"
~
a
.3
4
"
.
Q
~
!.
t
..
o
o
".
J
.
.
"
1
<
"
..
~
...~~
"
N
..-Nf"'I.
NNNN
ft