Loading...
Agreement with HNTB Corporation DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 2-0 2)3 3 t1 32 Contract No.19-109-03 l�1 S2J3 7—e• C z R { AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND HNTB CORPORATION FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2019-109-ND RESOLUTION NO. 2020-31132 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS . 4 ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES . 8 ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 12 ARTICLE 4. (INTENTIONALLY OMITTED) ..14 ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES . 14 ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 15 ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES ..16 ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS ..17 ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 17 ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT . 18 ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 19 ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS .20 ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 21 ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 21 ARTICLE 15. NOTICE .... 22 ARTICLE 16. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW .. 22 ARTICLE 17. INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT RIGHTS 24 ARTICLE 18. MISCELLANEUOS PROVISIONS 25 2 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A ............................................. 32 SCHEDULE B .................. 35 SCHEDULE C .36 SCHEDULED .................................................................................. 37 ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND HNTB CORPORATION FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES This Agreement made and entered into this 25 day of February , 20 25 (Effective Date), by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, (hereinafter referred to as City), and HNTB CORPORATION, a foreign profit corporation having its principal office at 715 Kirk Drive, Kansas City, MO 64105 (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on September 11, 2019, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was intended to prequalify traffic engineering consulting firms for future work as the need may arise; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 2020, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2020- 31132, respectively, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with HNTB Corporation, the third ranked proposer and, if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ; and NOW THEREFORE, City and Consultant, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions. The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement. Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents. The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES: "Additional Services"shall mean those services, in addition to the 4 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Basic Services in this Agreement, as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform, at the City's option, and which must be duly authorized, in writing, by the City Manager or his authorized designee, prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS: "Applicable Laws" means all laws, statutes, codes (including, but not limited to, building codes), ordinances, rules, regulations, lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, the Project Site or the Parties. BASIC SERVICES: "Basic Services"shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order. Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein) shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY(OR OWNER): The "City" shall mean the City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139. In all respects hereunder, City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity. In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including, but not limited to, its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits, Public Works Department permits, or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction, the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION: "City Commission" shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER: The"City Manager"shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing, including the Project Administrator, with respect to any specific matter(s) concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: "Construction Documents" shall mean the final (100% completed) plans, technical specifications, drawings, schematics, documents, and diagrams prepared by the architect/engineer of record for the Project,setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents. Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until(a)the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT: The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement, the "Consultant" shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities,agencies, boards,governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the professional has been engaged by City and who will perform(or cause to be performed through subconsultants acceptable to the City) all.Services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service 5 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Order. When the term "Consultant" is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers, employees, or agents of Consultants, and any other person or entity acting under the supervision, direction, or control of Consultant to provide any Services or similar professional services with respect to a Project("subconsultants"). The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity, except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement. Further, any subconsultant that may perform Services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities, agencies, boards, governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional services in connection with the Project. The subconsultants in Schedule "D", attached hereto, are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER: Consultant Service Order shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant(in substantial form as in Schedule A-1 attached hereto),that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services) which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order, and which may include studies or study activity, and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT: "Contract Amendment" shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City(as specified below)and executed between City and Consultant, covering changes, additions, or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation, authorizing a change in the Services, or the method and manner of performance thereof, or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02. The City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: "Contract Documents" shall mean this Agreement(together with all exhibits, addenda, Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto), and all Design Documents and Construction Documents. The Contract Documents shall also include, without limitation (together with all exhibits, addenda, and written amendments issued thereto), the Request for Qualifications (RFQ), instructions to bidders, bid form, bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any), the Contract for Construction, surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General, Supplementary, and other Conditions), Divisions 0-17 specifications, an approved Change Order(s), approved Construction Change Directive(s), and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION: "Contract for Construction" shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Consultant for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents, including, without limitation, a general Consultant, construction manager, design- builder or any other duly licensed construction Consultant selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. • CONSULTANT: "Consultant"shall mean the individual or individuals,firm, company, corporation, joint venture, or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. PROJECT: The "Project" shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant 6 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Service Order. PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR: The"Project Administrator" shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement, or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS: "Proposal Documents" shall mean the RFQ, together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any), which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof; provided, however, that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement, the Agreement shall prevail. Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement, except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel, its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein, and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES: "Schedules" shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A— Scope of Services Schedule A-1 —Consultant Service Order Schedule B— Consultant Compensation Schedule C— Hourly Rate Schedule Schedule D— Subconsultants SCOPE OF SERVICES:"Scope of Services"shall include the Project Scope, Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City), all as described in Schedule "A" hereto. SERVICES: "Services" shall mean all services, work, and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement, including services delineated as part of the Scope of Services. SOFT COSTS: "Soft Costs"shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including, without limitation, Consultant's Basic Services, Additional Services, surveys, testing, general consultant, financing, permitting fees and other similar costs, as determined by the City, that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. WORK: "Work" shall mean all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, tools, machinery, utilities, fabrication, transportation, insurance, bonds, permits and conditions thereof, building code changes and government approvals, licenses, tests, quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications, surveys, studies, and other items, work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction, installation, and functioning of the Project, together with all additional, collateral and incidental items, and work and services required for delivery of a completed, fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. 7 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA ARTICLE 2. BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project, specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project, Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws, whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in comparable projects in South Florida. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced, fully qualified, and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws) to perform the Services. Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various geotechnical related tasks, including geotechnical engineering reports, roadway reports, laboratory services, the obtaining and maintaining of all required permits, and Additional Services (as may be approved), all as further described in the Consultant Service Order; and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project, as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES: No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including,without limitation, any design errors or omissions (if applicable to the services performed by Consultant). Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any subconsultants), for the accuracy and competency of the Services, nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Services. Moreover, neither the City's inspection, review, approval or acceptance of, nor payment for, any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any subconsultant)of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement, or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct, unlawful acts, negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME: It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and, in this respect, the parties agree as follows: 8 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 2.7.1 Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant, which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof, and shall be in effect for three (3) years ("Initial Term"), plus two (2), one (1) year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager(Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term"). Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines, as set forth in the Consultant Service Order, including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement, and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project, the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator) in order to provide for the safe, expeditious, economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order. The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time, if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions, or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project). Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay; the requested adjustment(i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule; and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request(and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require), the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved, and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule. The Project Administrator's approval (if granted) shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive, professional, cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator, Consultant, and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted, or otherwise retained, to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement, and under a Consultant Service Order, in a competent, timely and professional manner, and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance, except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order(including the services performed by subconsultants), within the specified time period and specified cost. The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill, knowledge, and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consultant with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for, and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the 9 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City's requirements, the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws. The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services. In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have, the Consultant shall, at its expense, re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards. The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and for the cost of the re- performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, until twelve (12) months following final acceptance of the Work. The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant, in writing, of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.11 The City shall have the right, at any time, in its sole and absolute discretion, to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense) any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s). Whenever others are required to verify, review, or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including, without limitation, Consultants, other design professionals, and/or other consultants retained by the City), the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others' professional expertise to identify any discrepancies, errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards relating to comparable projects; or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws; or which are inconsistent with standards, decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement. Consultant will use reasonable care and skill, in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards, in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection. Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers, in writing. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner. The term "timely"shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances, taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which, under Florida Statutes, requires a license, certificate of authorization, or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s), it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate, in writing, within five (5) calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order, a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager"). The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing, coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services. Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator. Replacement (including reassignment) of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e. the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees, within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause 10 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1C1-1382862A08CDA therefore), to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager, or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project( including,without limitation, any subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge, furnish or make available to any third party(ies), any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project, without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator, unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services; or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws; or, in the course of judicial proceedings, where such information has been properly subpoenaed. Consultant shall also require subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services, as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order, do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project. If, during the course of performing work, services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order, Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order)which is, in the Consultant's reasonable opinion, outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order, then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator, in writing, and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services. If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator, said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order(whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services). Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work. Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish, maintain, and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City, upon request, with copies of any and all such documents and/or records. In addition, Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST, FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT, IN ANY WAY, BE CONSTRUED, INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS, A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION, NOR SHALL IT LIMIT, IN ANY WAY, THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM,ACTION, SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE,THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION, ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF 11 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS. INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES, OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: If applicable, the Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 100 of the City Code, as both may be amended from time to time, addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS: All services provided by subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview. Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement. Nothing , contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. The Consultant shall cause the names of subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its subconsultants' compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order. With respect to the performance of work by subconsultants, the Consultant shall, in approving and accepting such work, ensure the professional quality, completeness, and coordination of the subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall, upon the request of the City, submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation, standing, ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and subconsultants), including organizational documents, operating agreements and professional licensure documentation, and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the subconsultant with respect to the Project. However, the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section, the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse, waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including, without limitation, the professional licensure requirements. Any approval of a subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the subconsultant. Payment of subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant, and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3. THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator, who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents. The Project Administrator shall 12 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA be authorized (without limitation) to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project. The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents, provided, however, that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance, or to specifically direct or require compliance, shall in no way constitute a waiver of, or excuse, the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant, for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project. Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that, in making any such information available to Consultant, the City makes no express or implied certification, warranty, and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency, completeness or accuracy of such information. The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges, that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City, and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant. Such verification shall include, without limitation, visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project, where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition). Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time, in his/her sole discretion;the City Manager may furnish accounting, and insurance counseling services for the Project (including, without limitation, auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment, or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, the City, through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City,acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement, in writing, as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct, by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 The City Commission shall be the body to consider, comment upon, or approve any assignment, sale, transfer or subletting of this Agreement. Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.2 Contract Amendments shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended. 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement, the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary) requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made. Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents, the City Manager shall issue decisions and 13 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA authorizations which may include, without limitation, proprietary review, approval, or comment upon the schedules, plans, reports, estimates, contracts, and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7.1 The City Manager shall have prior reviewand approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide and render administrative (proprietary) decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement. In his/her discretion, the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant, the City Manager shall be authorized, but not required, to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided, however, that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement) may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all) shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 Contract Amendments shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended. 3.7.5 The City Manager may, in his/her sole discretion,form a committee or committees, or inquire of, or consult with, persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers, duties, and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s) under this Agreement, and, should such default remain uncured, in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review, evaluation, or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project, or portions thereof, detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City, and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED ARTICLE 5. ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant). The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required,; a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or a fee(in accordance with the rates in Schedule"C"hereto), with a "Not to Exceed" amount; Reimbursable Expenses (if any)with a "Not to Exceed" amount; 14 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable); the time required to complete the Additional Services; and an amended Project Schedule(if applicable). "Not to Exceed"shall mean the maximum cumulative fees allowable(or, in the case of Reimbursable Expenses,the maximum cumulative expenses allowable), which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator. The "Not to Exceed" amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or, in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses), and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets, (and, for Reimbursables, expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which do not currently exist, or which are not contemplated by the parties at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error, omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.2 Serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding, or legal proceeding, unless the subject matter at issue has arisen from the error omission, inadvertence, or negligence of Consultant. 5.2.3 Assistance in connection with bid protests, re-bidding, or re-negotiating contracts. 5.3 Additional services may be requested by the City using a Consultant Service Order(CSO). For each proposed Consultant Service Order, Consultant shall provide the City with a cost proposal on a lump sum or not-to-exceed basis, based on the fee schedule set forth in Schedule "C" hereto. Consultant Service Order shall be executed in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended. Any CSO not executed in accordance herewith shall be null and void. ARTICLE 6. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized, in advance, in writing, by the Project Administrator. Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator). Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement." Reimbursable Expenses may include, but not be limited to, the following: • Cost of reproduction, courier, and postage and handling of drawings, plans, specifications, and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its subconsultants, and courier, postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its subconsultants). • Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. • Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project(i.e. City permit fees). 15 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA ARTICLE 7. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order, "Schedule A-1" attached hereto, issued for a particular Project, shall be: $3,500 for Project Type"A", $5,800 for Project Type "B"and $6,800 for Project Type "C". 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45) calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Coordinator. Payments shall be made for Services satisfactorily performed. No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with Article 5 — Additional Services. Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub- contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto. Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request. No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION: During the Term of this Agreement, the City may, at its sole discretion, by written directive approved and executed by the City Manager, adjust the lump sum amount for Project Type "A", Project Type "B" and Project Type "C", to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) on a year to year basis. Such adjustment will be based on the cumulative change of the CPI since the Effective Date, for the Miami Urban Area, using the month and year of the Effective Date as the base month and year, as compared to the month and year of the beginning of the comparison year during the Term of this Agreement, or two percent (2%), whichever is lower. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Consultant. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT. Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner, but no more than once on a monthly basis, per project. Invoices shall identify/include the nature and extent of the work performed; Project Name, Project Type(A, B or C), lump sum amount and a copy of the original Service Order signed by the Project Manager. In the event sub-consultant work is used, the percentage of completion shall be identified. Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses. A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s)or Reimbursable Expense(s) shall accompany the invoice. 7.7.1 If requested, Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work(by employee category), and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). 7.7.2 The City shall pay Consultant within forty-five (45) calendar days from receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator. 7.7.3 Upon completion of the Services, Consultant's final payment shall require the prior written approval of the City Manager before disbursement of same. • 16 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA ARTICLE 8. CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books, records(whether financial or otherwise), correspondence, technical documents, and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager, or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]), during customary business hours. All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3)years after Consultant's completion of the Services. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries. Consultant shall also bind its subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9. OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes, correspondence, documents, plans and specifications, designs, drawings, renderings, calculations, specifications, models, photographs, reports, surveys, investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed) and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement, or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form, paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction, shall become the property of the City. Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form, as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty(30)days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30) days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be). However,the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing, In addition, the Consultant shall not disclose, release,or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager. The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option, the Consultant may be authorized, as an Additional Service, to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City; however, payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50% of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant. The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. 17 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS: The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project(or both),the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City, through the City Manager, may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon written notice to Consultant, in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith; (2) unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof; or (3) does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner. In the case of termination for cause by the City, the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30) day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City, the City, at its sole option and discretion, may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s), or otherwise. The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s) incurred by the City due to such termination. "Additional Cost" is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City, the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in, or can be calculated from, the City's initial written default notice). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2, the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared) by Consultant (including, without limitation, those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof). The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly, copy, and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause, the City through the City Manager, may also terminate this Agreement, upon fourteen(14) days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience,without cause, and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion) it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City. In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience, Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date(as set forth in the City's written notice), and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents(referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above). Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3, the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT: The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City, in the event that the City willfully 18 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof. In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant,the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided, however,that the City shall first be granted a thirty(30)day cure period(commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION: In the event of termination(whether for cause or for convenience), the Consultant shall immediately, upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination: (1) stop the performance of Services; (2) place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts, except for those which may have already been approved, in writing, by the Project Administrator; (3) terminate all existing orders and subcontracts; and (4) promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11. INSURANCE 11.1 The Consultant shall maintain the below required insurance in effect prior to awarding the Agreement and for the duration of the Agreement. The maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the Agreement and failure to maintain or renew coverage may be treated as a material breach of the Agreement, which could result in withholding of payments or termination of the Agreement. (a) Workers' Compensation Insurance for all employees of the Consultant as required by Florida Statute Chapter 440 and Employer Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. Should the Consultant be exempt from this Statute, the Consultant and each employee shall hold the City harmless from any injury incurred during performance of the Agreement. The exempt Consultant shall also submit (i) a written statement detailing the number of employees and that they are not required to carry Workers' Compensation insurance and do not anticipate hiring any additional employees during the term of this Agreement or(ii)a copy of a Certificate of Exemption. (b) Commercial General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 general aggregate. (c) Automobile Liability Insurance covering any automobile, if vendor has no owned automobiles, then coverage for hired and non-owned automobiles, with limit no less than$1,000,000 combined per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (d) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) Insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000. 11.2 Additional Insured - City of Miami Beach must be included by endorsement as an additional insured with respect to all liability policies (except Professional Liability and Workers' Compensation) arising out of work or operations performed on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's 19 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA insurance. 11.3 Notice of Cancellation - Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be cancelled, except with notice to the City of Miami Beach do EXIGIS Insurance Compliance Services. 11.4 Waiver of Subrogation — Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect the waiver of subrogation on the coverages required. However, this provision applies regardless of whether the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 11.5 Acceptability of Insurers — Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A:VII or higher. If not rated, exceptions may be made for members of the Florida Insurance Funds (i.e. FWCIGA, FAJUA). Carriers may also be considered if they are licensed and authorized to do insurance business in the State of Florida. 11.6 Verification of Coverage—Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable insurance language, effecting coverage required by this contract. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, required by these specifications, at any time. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH do EXIGIS Insurance Compliance Services P.O. Box 4668—ECM #35050 New York, NY 10163-4668 Kindly submit all certificates of insurance, endorsements, exemption letters to our servicing agent, EXIGIS, at: Certificates-miamibeachtu'�,riskworks.corn 11.7 Special Risks or Circumstances-The City of Miami Beach reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the vendor of his liability and obligation under this section or under any other section of this agreement. ARTICLE 12. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08, Florida Statutes, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, tothe extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of 20 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits, or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may issue thereon. Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City or its officers, employees, agents, and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent, reckless, or intentionally wrongful actions, errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions. In reviewing, approving or rejecting any submissions by the Consultant, or other acts of the Consultant, the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including, without limitation its subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers) under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS: It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error, an omission, or any combination thereof in the Consultant's performance of the Services will constitute an additional cost to\,the City that would not have been incurred without the error. The damages to the City for errors, omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant, including, without limitation, the direct, indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error, omission,or any combination thereof. Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors,omissions, or any combination thereof, the Consultant may appeal this determination, in writing, to the applicable Assistant City Manager. The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, conclusive and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable. In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator, the Consultant shall present any such objections, in writing, to the City Manager. The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager. This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed" amount of the fee paid to.Consultant under this Agreement, less any amount(s)actually paid to Consultant hereunder. Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement, with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed" fee under this Agreement, less any amount(s) actually paid by 21 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA the City to the Consultant hereunder.Accordingly,and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement, Consultant hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement, in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount" of Consultant's fees under this Agreement, which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s)actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection, or elsewhere in this Agreement, is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability, as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15. NOTICE All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Raul Aguila, Interim City Manager raulaquila a(�,miabeachfl.gov With a copy to: Transportation and Mobility City of Miami Beach 1688 Meridian Avenue, Suite 801 Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attn: Jose R. Gonzalez iosegonzalezAmiamibeachfl.gov All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: HNTB Corporation 161 NW 6th Street, Suite 1000 Miami FL, 33136 Attn: Gus Pego, PE gpegoahntb.com All notices mailed electronically to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted. ARTICLE 16. CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW 16.1 Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, as may be amended from time to time. 16.2 The term "public records" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011(12), which means all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of the physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. 16.3 Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes, if the Consultant meets the definition 22 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA of"Consultant" as defined in Section 119.0701(1)(a), the Consultant shall: (a) Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (b) Upon request from the City's custodian of public records, provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed, except asauthorized by law, for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (d) Upon completion of the Agreement, transfer, at no cost to the City, all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service. If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement,the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement, the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the City, upon request from the City's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. 16.4 REQUEST FOR RECORDS; NONCOMPLIANCE. • 16.4.1 A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City. If the City does not possess the requested records,the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request, and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time. 16.4.2 Consultant's failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement, and the City, at its sole discretion, may: (1) unilaterally terminate the Agreement; (2)avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement; and/or(3)avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. 16.4.3 A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s. 119.10. 16.5 CIVIL ACTION. 16.5.1 If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records relating to the City's contract for services, the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement, including reasonable attorneys' fees, if: (a) The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time; and (b) At least 8 business days before filing the action, the plaintiff provided written notice of the public records request, including a statement that the Consultant has not complied with the request, to the City and to the Consultant. 16.5.2 A notice complies with subparagraph(16.5.1)(b)if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent. Such notices must be sent by 23 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA common carrier delivery service or by registered, Global Express Guaranteed, or certified mail, with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery, which may be in an electronic format. 16.5.3 A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. 16.6 IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION: RAFAEL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 E-MAIL: RAFAELGRANADO(@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE: 305-673-7411 ARTICLE 17. INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT RIGHTS 17.1 Pursuant to Section 2-256 of the Code of the City of Miami Beach, the City has established the Office of the Inspector General which may, on a random basis, perform reviews, audits, inspections, and investigations on all City contracts, throughout the duration of said contracts. This random audit is separate and distinct from any other audit performed by or on behalf of the City. 17.2 The Office of the Inspector General is authorized to investigate City affairs and empowered to review past, present and proposed City programs, accounts, records, contracts and transactions. In addition, the Inspector General has the power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, require the production of witnesses and monitor City projects and programs. Monitoring of an existing City project or program may include a report concerning whether the project is on time, within budget and in conformance with the contract documents and applicable law. The Inspector General shall have the power to audit, investigate, monitor, oversee, inspect and review operations, activities, performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design, bid specifications, (bid/proposal) submittals, activities of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees, lobbyists, City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption. Pursuant to Section 2-378 of the City Code, the City is allocating a percentage of its overall annual contract expenditures to fund the activities and operations of the Office of Inspector General. 17.3 Upon ten (10)days written notice to the Consultant, the Consultant shall make all requested records and documents available to the Inspector General for inspection and copying. The Inspector General is empowered to retain the services of independent private sector auditors to audit, investigate, monitor, oversee, inspect and review operations activities, performance and 24 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA procurement process including but not limited to project design, bid specifications, (bid/proposal) submittals, activities of the Consultant its officers, agents and employees, lobbyists, City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption. 17.4 The Inspector General shall have the right to inspect and copy all documents and records in the Consultant's possession, custody or control which in the Inspector General's sole judgment, pertain to performance of the contract, including, but not limited to original estimate files, change order estimate files, worksheets, proposals and agreements from and with successful subconsultants and suppliers, all project-related correspondence, memoranda, instructions, financial documents, construction documents, (bid/proposal) and contract documents, back- change documents, all documents and records which involve cash, trade or volume discounts, insurance proceeds, rebates,or dividends received, payroll and personnel records and supporting documentation for the aforesaid documents and records. 17.5 The Consultant shall make available at its office at all reasonable times the records, materials, and other evidence regarding the acquisition (bid preparation)and performance of this Agreement, for examination, audit, or reproduction, until three (3)years after final payment under this Agreement or for any longer period required by statute or by other clauses of this Agreement. In addition: (a) If this Agreement is completely or partially terminated, the Consultant shall make available records relating to the work terminated until three (3,) years after any resulting final termination settlement; and (b) The Consultant shall make available records relating to appeals or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this Agreement until such appeals, litigation, or claims are finally resolved. 17.6 The provisions in this section shall apply to the Consultant, its officers, agents, • employees, subconsultants and suppliers. The Consultant shall incorporate the provisions in this section in all subcontracts and all other agreements executed by the Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 17.7 Nothing in this section shall impair any independent right to the City to conduct audits or investigative activities. The provisions of this section are neither intended nor shall they be construed to impose any liability on the City by the Consultant or third parties. ARTICLE 18. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 18.1 VENUE AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL: This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida, both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws. The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County, Florida, if in state court, and the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 25 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 18.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS: Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age, and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, marital or familial status, or age. 18.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT: In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act(Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), a person or affiliate who is a consultant, who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City, may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not bid on leases of real property to the City, may not be awarded or perform work as a Consultant, supplier, subconsultant, or subconsultant under a contract with the City, and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two, for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. For violation of this subsection by Consultant, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City, and pursue debarment of Consultant 18.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE: Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this subsection, City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement, without any liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover)the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. 18.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 18.5.1 The Consultant shall, during the Term of this Agreement, be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 18.5.2 Proiect Documents. In accordance with Section 119.071 (3) (b)(2), Florida Statutes, entitled "General exemptions from inspecting or copying public records," all building plans, blueprints, schematic drawings, and diagrams, including draft, preliminary, and final formats,are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s. 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. Information made exempt by this paragraph, with prior written approval from the City Manager, may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities; to a licensed architect, engineer, or Consultant who is performing work on or related to the Project; or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction. The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 18.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 18.5.2, the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal, State, and City procedures, as may be amended from time to time, by which the documents are handled, copied, and distributed which may include, but is not limited 26 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA to, each employee of Consultant and subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy, duplicate, or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager, in writing. 18.5.2.2 The Consultant and its subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 18.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 18.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time, and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 18.5.3 E-Verify 18.5.3.1 Consultant shall comply with Section 448.095, Florida Statutes, "Employment Eligibility" ("E-Verify Statute"), as may be amended from time to time. Pursuant to the E-Verify Statute, commencing on January 1, 2021, Consultant shall register with and use the E-Verify system to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees during the Term of the Agreement. Additionally, Consultant shall expressly require any subconsultant performing work or providing services pursuant to the Agreement to likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subconsultant during the contract Term. If Consultant enters into a contract with an approved subconsultant, the subconsultant must provide the Consultant with an affidavit stating that the subconsultant does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with an unauthorized alien. Consultant shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of the Agreement or such other extended period as may be required under this Agreement. 18.5.3.2 TERMINATION RIGHTS. 18.5.3.2.1 If the City has a good faith belief that Consultant has knowingly violated Section 448.09(1), Florida Statutes, the City shall terminate this Agreement with Consultant for cause, and the City shall thereafter have or owe no further obligation or liability to Consultant. 18.5.3.2.2 If the City has a good faith belief that a subconsultant has knowingly violated the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.1 but the Consultant otherwise complied with such subsection, the City will promptly notify the Consultant and order the Consultant to immediately terminate the Agreement with the subconsultant. Consultant's failure to terminate a subconsultant shall be an event of default under this Agreement, entitling City to terminate the Consultant's contract for cause. 18.5.3.2.3 A contract terminated under the foregoing Subsection 27 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 18.5.3.2.1 or 18.5.3.2.2 is not in breach of contract and may not be considered as such. 18.5.3.2.4 The City or Consultant or a subconsultant may file an action with the Circuit or County Court to challenge a termination under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 or 18.5.3.2.2 no later than 20 calendar days after the date on which the contract was terminated. 18.5.3.2.5 If the City terminates the Agreement with Consultant under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1, Consultant may not be awarded a public contract for at least 1 year after the date of termination of this Agreement. 18.5.3.2.6 Consultant is liable for any additional costs incurred by the City as a result of the termination of this Agreement under this Section 18.5.3. 18.6 FORCE MAJEURE: 18.6.1 A "Force Majeure" event is an event that (i) in fact causes a delay in the performance of the Consultant or the City's obligations under the Agreement, and (ii) is beyond the reasonable control of such party unable to perform the obligation, and (iii) is not due to an intentional act, error, omission, or negligence of such party, and (iv) could not have reasonably been foreseen and prepared for by such party at any time prior to the occurrence of the event. Subject to the foregoing criteria, Force Majeure may include events such as war, civil insurrection, riot, fires, epidemics, pandemics, terrorism, sabotage, explosions, embargo restrictions, quarantine restrictions, transportation accidents, strikes, strong hurricanes or tornadoes, earthquakes, or other acts of God which prevent performance. Force Majeure shall not include technological impossibility, inclement weather, or failure to secure any of the required permits pursuant to the Agreement. 18.6.2 If the City or Consultant's performance of its contractual obligations is prevented or delayed by an event believed by to be Force Majeure, such party shall immediately upon learning of the occurrence of the event or of the commencement of any such delay, but in no case within fifteen (15) business days thereof, provide notice of (i) of the occurrence of event of Force Majeure, (ii)of the nature of the event and the cause thereof, (iii)of the anticipated impact on the Agreement, (iv)of the anticipated period of the delay, and(v)of what course of action such party plans to take in order to mitigate the detrimental effects of the event. The timely delivery of the notice of the occurrence of a Force Majeure event is a condition precedent to allowance of any relief pursuant to this section; however, receipt of such notice shall not constitute acceptance that the event claimed to be a Force Majeure event is in fact Force Majeure, and the burden of proof of the occurrence of a Force Majeure event shall be on the requesting party. 18.6.3 No party hereto shall be liable for its failure to carry out its obligations under the Agreement during a period when such party is rendered unable, in whole or in part, by Force Majeure to carry out such obligations. The suspension of any of the obligations under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure event shall be of no greater scope and no longer duration than is required. The party shall use its reasonable best efforts to continue 28 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA to perform its obligations hereunder to the extent such obligations are not affected or are only partially affected by the Force Majeure event, and to correct or cure the event or condition excusing performance and otherwise to remedy its inability to perform to the extent its inability to perform is the direct result of the Force Majeure event with all reasonable dispatch. 18.6.4 Obligations pursuant to the Agreement that arose before the occurrence of a Force Majeure event causing the suspension of performance shall not be excused as a result of such occurrence unless such occurrence makes such performance not reasonably possible. The obligation to pay money in a timely manner for obligations and liabilities which matured prior to the occurrence of a Force Majeure event shall not be subject to the Force Majeure provisions. 18.6.5 Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary herein, in the event of a Force Majeure occurrence, the City may, at the sole discretion of the City Manager, suspend the City's payment obligations under the Agreement,and may take such action without regard to the notice requirements herein. Additionally, in the event that an event of Force Majeure delays a party's performance under the Agreement for a time period greater than thirty (30) days, the City may, at the sole discretion of the City Manager, terminate the Agreement on a given date, by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination. If the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, Consultant shall be paid for any Services satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination; following which the City shall be discharged from any and all liabilities, duties, and terms arising out of, or by virtue of, this Agreement. In no event will any condition of Force Majeure extend this Agreement beyond its stated term. Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation, unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 18.7 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: If applicable to the performance of Consultant's Services, the Consultant shall prepare, without added compensation, all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Documents prepared by Consultant, including documents prepared by its subconsultants. Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors, omissions, and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 18.8 ASSIGNMENT:The Consultant shall not assign,transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person,firm, association or corporation, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the City Commission, which consent, if given at all, shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion. However, the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by subconsultants, subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 18.9 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself, his/her partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. The Consultant shall afford the City(through the City Commission) the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 29 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 18.10 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES: In the performance of the Services prescribed herein, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries, wages, materials, equipment, Subconsultants, and other purchased services, etc., as necessary to complete said Services. 18.11 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 18.11.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide design and other services, and to include all necessary items for the proper completion of such services for a fully functional Project which, when constructed in accordance with the design, will be able to be used by the City for its intended purpose. The Consultant shall perform, as Basic Services, such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced, as necessary to complete the.Project. 18.11.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary, to any person, nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries, professional liability, or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 18.11.3 No acceptance,order, payment,or certificate of or by the City, or its employees or agents, shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 18.11.4 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein; and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly,the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 30 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals, attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: DocuSigned by: Kabul f. aratuth , 12-2 ‘---„, RAF2A1H36KNI DO, CITY CLERK DAN GELBER, MAYOR Date 2/25/2021 11:25 EST . Attest HNTB CORPORATION DocuSigned by: —DocuSignetl by: Lim 1sbtti AigUlti I P . DC88ABBOEC694FE... �A8563F8E604D448... Signature/Secretary Signature/Vice President Craig Denson Gus Pego Print Name Print Name Date 02/12/2021 APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE ja &F.R EXECUTION k., VCiz, City Attorney VDo in_ 31 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA SCHEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES PROJECT TYPE "A": • Attend the initial traffic methodology meeting. • Determine the impact based on trip generation using the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual for the proposed modifications/developments. • Review project site plan provided by the applicant as part of the initial and final submission to verify the design is in accordance with the City Public Works Department Standards and Transportation Department's Street Design Guidelines and that all modes of transportation are considered, and travel path conflicts are mitigated. • Assess loading and trash pick-up operations for the initial and final submission. • Determine the applicable Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies and review the integration of such strategies into the project. • Review of on-site and off-site vehicular circulation, including but not limited to signage and striping for the initial and final submission. Review the initial and final submission of the traffic impact study and provide comments within 5 days of the report submission. • Provide prompt input to Transportation and Mobility Department and Planning Department staff on the accuracy of the information provided in the studies as they relate to the impact to the existing City transportation system. Expected response time would be within five working days after receiving the traffic study. The peer reviewer will be required to visit the project site one (1) time prior to submitting the review of the study. The site visit date shall be documented with pictures and site notes to be included as part of the review memo to be submitted to the City. • Prepare a memorandum containing comments of the traffic study considering all pertinent information. • Discuss the results of the traffic impact study review with Transportation and Mobility Department staff and Planning Department staff. • Attend and participate a maximum of two (2) land-use board meetings including but not limited to Planning Board hearings to respond to questions regarding the peer review of the traffic impact study. PROJECT TYPE "B": • Project Type"B"shall include all of the items included in Project Type"A" listed above and shall also include the following services: o Validate/Assess travel demand growth based on the forecasted historical and long-range transportation plans as part of the traffic 32 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA study submittal. o Validate the traffic data collection as part of the traffic study submittal. o Validate existing condition analysis, future without project and future total transportation models to assess existing and future level of service conditions. o Validate the queue analysis for all intersections and driveways as part of the traffic study submittal. o Validate proposed roadway improvements submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer to mitigate possible traffic impacts. o Review study findings and recommendations as contained in the traffic study submittal. o Review of geometric and operational analysis of all options/alternatives proposed or considered contained in the traffic study submittal. o Prepare a memorandum containing comments of the traffic study considering all pertinent information. PROJECT TYPE "C": • Project Type "C" shall include all of the items included in Project Type "A" and "B" listed above and shall also include the following services: o Assessment of valet parking operation based on mechanical parking or automated parking systems as contained in the traffic study submittal. Familiarity with the operation of these parking systems is highly desirable. o Review self-parking and/or valet parking analysis as contained in the traffic study submittal. o Analyze ride-share vehicle operations and determine pick-up and drop-off locations as contained in the traffic study submittal. o Prepare and/or review maneuverability templates based on Transoft Solutions, Inc.Auto-Turn software to check on adequacy of turning radii as part of the proposed site circulation. o Prepare a memorandum containing comments of the traffic study considering all pertinent information. 33 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SCHEDULE A-1 CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND HNTB CORPORATION Service Order No. for Consulting Services. TO: HNTB CORPORATION DATE: Pursuant to the Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and Consultant for TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES(2019-109-ND)you are directed to provide the following Services: SCOPE OF SERVICES/ PROJECT TYPE: [ ]A [ ] B [ ] C • Per attached proposal dated , to be considered part of this Agreement. Project Name and No: Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Fee for this Service Order: $ The above fee is a Lump Sum OR a Not to Exceed (check one) Dept. Director Date Assistant City Manager Date Consultant Date City Manager Date 34 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA SCHEDULE B CONSULTANT COMPENSATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND HNTB CORPORATION Pursuant to scope of services Schedule A hereto the cost per Traffic Engineering Consulting project type(s) is as follows: TYPE A: $3,500.00 TYPE B: $5,800.00 TYPE C: $6,800.00 These services will be paid "Lump Sum" or"Not to Exceed" limit for provision of the Services, as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order issued for a specific Project. Additional services shall be paid in a"Lump Sum"or"Not to Exceed" limit, based on the hourly rate schedule set forth in Schedule "C" hereto. 35 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA SCHEDULE C ADDITIONAL SERVICES HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE For Traffic Engineering Consultant Services CATEGORIES HOURLY RATES Project Principal $ 275.00 Senior Project Manager $ 260.00 Senior Transportation Engineer $ 185.00 Senior Traffic Engineer $ 170.00 Senior Transportation Planner $ 170.00 Traffic Engineer $ 105.00 Transportation Planner $ 105.00 Senior CAD Technician $ 90.00 CAD Technician $ 75.00 Clerical $ 75.00 Administrative Assistant $ 75.00 36 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SCHEDULE D APPROVED SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANTS • No pre-approved sub-consultants submitted with proposal. 37 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RESOLUTION NO: 2020-31132 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE • CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2019-109-ND, FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE- QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES; FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; KIMLEY- HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; AND HNTB CORPORATION, THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. • WHEREAS, on September 11, 2019, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services; and WHEREAS, RFQ No. 2019-109-ND was released on September 13, 2019; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on September 23, 2019; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the City received a total of 19 proposals, including proposals from A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp.; Atkins North America, Inc.; Hailstone Economic, LLC; Lambert Advisory, L.C.; The Corradino Group, Inc.; Caftan Engineering Group, Inc.; Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.; Carnahan, Proctor and Cross, Inc.; Choice- Engineering Consultants, Inc.; Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc.; F.R. Aleman and Associates, Inc.; HBC Engineering Company; HNTB Corporation; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.; Kittelson & Associates, Inc.; Marlin Engineering, Inc.; McMahon &Associafes, Inc.; Metric Engineering, Inc.; Stanley Consultants, Inc.; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.; and • WSP USA, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the evaluation committee ("Evaluation Committee)" convened on November 21, 2019 to review and score proposals; and 'WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the top three (3) proposals was as follows: The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager is recommending that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants, and further authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer. DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor, and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services; authorize the Administration to establish a pool, of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services; further, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., the _ second ranked proposer; and HNTB Corporation, the third ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /5' day of /6141411-1.- 019. • Dan Gelber, Mayor ATTEST: kkfRafael'E. Gr nad , CiClerk • ` 'tit4 'APPROVED AS TO 47� \�\t �` i+� FORM&LANGUAGE ..• .i:''`y/ &FOR EXCUTION • PIC( INCQR� TED/ City Att_•;;:iy n <Dote • vSql!,..rv: -...r.“-PA... c-7/.. F:\PURC1Solicitations1201912019-109-ND RFQ Traffic Engineering_Consulting_Services110 - Award Documents\RFQ-2019-109-ND-Resolution FINAL.doc DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Resolutions-C7 R MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales,City Manager DATE: January 15,2020 c SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE•MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2019-109-ND FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution accepting the recommendation of the City Manager. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Many of the projects managed by the Transportation Department require traffic engineering services. Typically,the City has outsourced the required engineering services to qualified firms through a continuing contract established in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. In anticipation of the current contract's expiration of February 2020, the City issued the RFQ seeking to prequalify traffic engineering consulting firms for future work as they need may arise. The RFQ state that the City may award a pool of one (1) or more consultants eligible to be considered for future work. Prequalifying firms now prior to the work actually being identified streamlines the process of deploying a firm once the need arise. The firm is selected in accordance with the referenced statute, which requires the City to determine the best firm for the work and negotiate a consultant service order based on pm-negotiated rates.The described process used by the City is typical of how most cities across the state engage engineering services in accordance with statutory requirements. • ANALYSIS On September 11, 2019, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2019-109-ND for traffic engineering consultant services. On September 13, 2019, the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pm-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on September 23, 2019. One addendum was issued to address questions from bidders.The Procurement Department issued bid notices to all firms registered for the discipline with www.bidsync.com website, as well as other known bidders. In total,over 8,000 firms were notified of which 76 accessed the advertised solicitation. RFQ responses were due and received on October 28, 2019. The City received a total of 19 proposals from the firms included in Attachment A. Page 796 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA The Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager convened on November 21,2019,to consider proposals received: The Committee was comprised of Michael Belush, Chief of Planning and Zoning, Planning Department; Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, Assistant Director, Transportation Department; Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability, Planning Department; and Doraida Rodriguez, Traffic Engineer III, Department of Transportation Public Works, Miami-Dade County.The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine.Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the proposers being ranked by the Evaluation Committee in the following order(See Attachment A): 1st.The Corradino Group, Inc. 2nd.Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 3rd. HNTB Corporation • 4th. Caftan Engineering Group, Inc. 4th. McMahon&Associates, Inc. 6th. Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. 7th.Atkins North America,Inc. 8th. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 9th.Calvin,Giordano&Associates, Inc. 10th. Metric Engineering, Inc. 11th.Stanley Consultants, Inc. 12th. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. 13th. F.R.Aleman and Associates, Inc. 14th.Carnahan,Proctor and Cross, Inc. 15th.Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 16th.WSP USA, Inc. 17th.A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 18th. Choice Engineering Consultants, Inc. 19th.HBC Engineering Company A summary of the three top-ranked firms, based on the information provided by each firm, follows: • The Corradino Group, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm,The Corratiino Group, Inc.was established in 1970 and is headquartered in South Florida.The Corradino Group, Inc.has provided planning, engineering design, environmental and construction management services to government entities and the private sector for 49 years. Its success is built on delivering a quality product developed through the inclusiveness of the planning process and the effectiveness of communication. Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. was founded as a transportation firm in 1967 and is now one of the largest and fastest growing full- service consulting firms in Florida. As a transportation engineering, planning, landscape architecture, surveying, and environmental services firm, Kimley-Hom offers a wide range of Page 797 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA consulting services to local, regional,national,and international clients. Its staff will offer the City ' critical insights into practicalprogram approaches for ongoing traffic engineering'services. HNTB Corporation According to the information provided by the firm, HNTB Corporation was founded in 1914 and has built a reputation for excellence and innovation. HNTB represents four of the state's five expressway enterprises serving as a General Engineering Consultant or Project Manager for Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Central Florida Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and the Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority. They have provided general transportation and traffic engineering services to the City since May of 2018. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ,t • The cost of the related services,determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. CONCLUSION While the City is fortunate to have received such a robust response to the RFQ,the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department is insufficient to keep all firms busy and interested in City projects. When considering the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department, it appears that awarding to three(3)firms would provide a sufficient pool of resources while allowing for each firm to receive enough work to stay interested. After reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee process, I concur with the Evaluation Committee and find The Corradino Group, Inc., Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., and HNTB Corporation,the three top ranked firms respectively,to be the best qualified firms to establish a pre-qualified pool of consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services.These firms have strong teams with a wealth of knowledge in the City of Miami Beach and neighboring municipalities.The three(3)teams have direct familiarity with the City's boards, land-use regulations and/or the City's vision. Additionally, some of the prior experience provided by the firms demonstrated their ability to carry out innovative ideas, solutions, and recommendations. Further,each firm has performed well on prior projects with the City. For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services;authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer, and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. Applicable Area Citywide Js this a Resident Right to Does this item utilize G.O. Know item? Bond Funds? Yes No Strategic Connection Mobility-Increase multi-modal mobility citywide and connectivity regionally. • Page 798 of 1618 J DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Legislative Trackinv Transportation and Mobility/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description D Attachment A • Page 799 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA g111111111111 g : lb i +'0ngo.,,li il;ig5i . IP $ 0 1• .xl ! '� �' $ xxixx ��'oi.�_n.n` I aim 01 9 I �' alii v 1 j I �' 1 `' gI-Ig! 1 I I , o { e000000000 o ee o 0 o0 7y} •T7 22E22:18tO+l002l5 NiO1TNN 29 o r i 1 ' i , 1 I , ; I fa� 1 l 1 • 1 1 I 6 i i 0 0 o e o o a e o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 !oIOl0lololobolcIo.°I.t.,o IO:O'O1O 1010 ; Q 4 Ilii I : 11 i i I. 0 l .. . 1 i I ' _ ! / 1 I .I frl O I • • Im;m' , i : i I .. Ca iSSI>W+822:53010.11.12 L12122 NV i o 7e I 1 2 1,;ar„-4m�04fNVNV" Gmtrat ma Ranktnp 1 i I mm I 1 5 a$aIo 18•tAilnl� imsitmll:o 0 V;810 2 N V m 1 1 • • I , l - Ii 11 . ; 1111 1 i • = ;olol0�OIOIOIo!oIOlolol0 o alo:ola 0 0 - 2 • I _ 1111 ! i I i ! . I • i I { 3 o 1 I . I . -i IT .1 v v Iv m m a.I m .1.1�1 v v C O}Emo 2(ml�i 21228;8A. 12 4rmo2 VV n , i • I • : 3 X ito":vlaIel roltl w !m!"m O 8:-.18lmI � - 1 lm ml u m •o1u Ranking . i • , i f 1 14�'•tio,;:a.Ncm s,s1;:v a11mu l'ilmiijt�n IwI1°.l LHHl • • I00000 00000000 0000l0i0 % I. + ° ' I m QJ i 161 V N m AI{ViIINIa IJI N tW0 A1s 1--lia: 1 q OfI� j i 1 1 I I . i j • :-.1.,K9 j,m-dlmlN N m O-•:1;:.,5,-;-.1-,I0IY Ranid•'g OlmmmI 1 .. ! )mmm aO�1 oOl isigigssszit 0101010 m0 i • 5 i • i ( . ' ,I. 11 i1 0.0:010 0!0 o:oiololo!01e 0.0:0;0.0 ! 1 1I 1 t - 1 1 t 1 • 1 i i V•p•p�I�p Isla 100 OIO O O N:Pi0I0 O-at OlOIOjO Is!a ' 1 G?G?G? :,...4.,.,..,,..,,,,,,..„,,.....„, mE,i...toil Ranking I II. i,. 1111,011.111.0,11,1:t.:/�y OI(T N 00.tT•411N NI • iN alN•+0.01a1A CO N+N +ta,10•+Itp1g a I.,i • l , I I t 1 1 f I I l�-.�u�-.i.Ia hliyIM1Y1,010 w 1AI+mN•',..11'. Ranking Cnversheet Page 1 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Resolutions-C7 R MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales,City Manager DATE: January 15,2020 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2019-109-ND, FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES; FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC.,THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; AND HNTB CORPORATION, THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution accepting the recommendation of the City Manager. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Many of the projects managed by the Transportation Department require traffic engineering services. Typically, the City has outsourced the required engineering services to qualified firms through a continuing contract established in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. In anticipation of the current contract's expiration of February 2020, the City issued the RFQ seeking to prequalify traffic engineering consulting firms for future work as they need may arise.The RFQ state that the City may award a pool of one (1) or more consultants eligible to be considered for future work. Prequalifying firms now prior to the work actually being identified streamlines the process of deploying a firm once the need arise.The firm is selected in accordance with the referenced statute, which requires the City to determine the best firm for the work and negotiate a consultant service order based on pre-negotiated rates. The described process used by the City is typical of how most cities across the state engage engineering services in accordance with statutory requirements. ANALYSIS On September 11,2019,the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications(RFQ)2019-109-ND for traffic engineering consultant services. On September 13, 2019, the RFQ was issued. A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on September 23,2019.One addendum was issued to address questions from bidders. The Procurement Department issued bid notices to all firms registered for the discipline with www.bidsync.com website, as well as other known bidders. In total, over 8,000 firms were notified of which 76 accessed the advertised solicitation. RFQ responses were due and received on October 28,2019.The City received a total of 19 proposals from the firms included in Attachment A. The Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager convened on November 21,2019,to consider proposals received.The Committee was comprised of Michael Belush, Chief of Planning and Zoning, Planning Department; Josiel Ferrer-Diaz,Assistant Director,Transportation Department; Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability, Planning Department; and Doraida Rodriguez, Traffic Engineer III, Department of Transportation Public Works, Miami-Dade County. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the proposers being ranked by the Evaluation Committee in the following order(See Attachment A): 1st.The Corradino Group,Inc. 2nd.Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. 3rd.HNTB Corporation 4th.Caltran Engineering Group,Inc. 4th.McMahon&Associates,Inc. 6th.Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. 7th.Atkins North America,Inc. 8th.Marlin Engineering,Inc. 9th.Calvin,Giordano&Associates,Inc. 10th.Metric Engineering,Inc. 11th.Stanley Consultants,Inc. 12th.Kittelson&Associates,Inc. https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/C over Sheet.aspx?ItemID=15414&Me... 1/15/2020 Coversheet Page 2 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 13th.F.R.Aleman and Associates,Inc. 14th.Carnahan,Proctor and Cross,Inc. 15th.Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 16th.WSP USA,Inc. 17th.A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 18th.Choice Engineering Consultants,Inc. 19th.HBC Engineering Company A summary of the three top-ranked firms,based on the information provided by each firm,follows: The Corradino Group,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, The Corradino Group, Inc. was established in 1970 and is headquartered in South Florida.The Corradino Group, Inc.has provided planning,engineering design,environmental and construction management services to government entities and the private sector for 49 years. Its success is built on delivering a quality product developed through the inclusiveness of the planning process and the effectiveness of communication. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.was founded as a transportation firm in 1967 and is now one of the largest and fastest growing full-service consulting firms in Florida.As a transportation engineering,planning, landscape architecture,surveying,and environmental services firm,Kimley-Horn offers a wide range of consulting services to local, regional,national,and international clients. Its staff will offer the City critical insights into practical program approaches for ongoing traffic engineering services. HNTB Corporation According to the information provided by the firm,HNTB Corporation was founded in 1914 and has built a reputation for excellence and innovation. HNTB represents four of the state's five expressway enterprises serving as a General Engineering Consultant or Project Manager for Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Central Florida Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and the Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority.They have provided general transportation and traffic engineering services to the City since May of 2018. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. CONCLUSION While the City is fortunate to have received such a robust response to the RFQ, the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department is insufficient to keep all firms busy and interested in City projects. When considering the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department,it appears that awarding to three (3)firms would provide a sufficient pool of resources while allowing for each firm to receive enough work to stay interested. After reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee process,I concur with the Evaluation Committee and find The Corradino Group, Inc., Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.,and HNTB Corporation,the three top ranked firms respectively,to be the best qualified firms to establish a pre-qualified pool of consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services.These firms have strong teams with a wealth of knowledge in the City of Miami Beach and neighboring municipalities.The three(3)teams have direct familiarity with the City's boards, land-use regulations and/or the City's vision. Additionally, some of the prior experience provided by the firms demonstrated their ability to carry out innovative ideas,solutions,and recommendations. Further, each firm has performed well on prior projects with the City. For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.,as the second ranked proposer,and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer;and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. Applicable Area Citywide Is this a Resident Right to Does this item utilize G.O. Know item? Bond Funds? Yes No Strategic Connection Mobility-Increase multi-modal mobility citywide and connectivity regionally. Legislative Tracking Transportation and Mobility/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=15414&Me... 1/15/2020 Coversheet Page 3 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Description CI Attachment A D Resolution https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=15414&Me... 1/15/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA ATTACHMENT B SOLICITATION RFQ AND ADDENDA DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Procurement Department 1 V 1 I /-'�! �/ 1 IAtr 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES(the RFQ) October 18,2019 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by str ethrough and additions are underlined). 1. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet Exhibit B: Proposals Submitted for RFQ 2014-116-SR Exhibit C:Commission Memorandum for Issuance 2. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED: Q1. Is there an estimated budget and plan holders list available? Al: At the present time there is no estimated budget. Please refer to Exhibit A, for the Pre- Proposal Sign-in Sheet. Q2: I am looking for copies of the submitted (and winning RFQs)for the previous contract with regards to Traffic Engineering Consultant Services. A2: Please refer to Exhibit B, Proposals Submitted for RFQ 2014-116-SR. Q3: Will the City be uploading the sign-up sheet from the Pre-Submittal meeting last week regarding RFQ 2019-109-ND? A3: Please refer to Exhibit A, Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet. Q4: Will the City choose a pool of consultants? A4: Through this RFQ, the City seeks to create a pool of qualified firms that can expeditiously provide the City with traffic engineering consulting services when the need arises. Q5: Is the City looking for a complete team of consultants? A5: Don't understand the question.The service is for peer reviewing. Companies can submit by themselves or prime and subconsultant submission. Q6: Does the scope of services related to the bulleted items in Tab 3 on page 10? Is there more detailed scope of services? A6: The purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified firms (as determined by the City). Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. When the need for traffic engineering consulting services arises the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope and cost. RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/18/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA M I /� ' ( B E /\ C H Procurement Department /tel V 1 /"1 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q7: Is there a minimum and/or maximum of teams to be selected as part of the pool of consultants? A7: There is no minimum or maximum number of.teams the City intends to select as part of the pool of consultants. - . Q8: Are there any DBE commitment requirements?Wilt the selection criteria reflect this requirement? A8: There are no DBE commitment requirements. Q9: Has the selection committee been defined? Is it possible to share the members of the selection • committee? A9: Please refer to Exhibit C, Commission Memorandum for.Issuance. Q10: Is there an overall maximum contract amount of dollars awarded by consultant? A10: There is no overall maximum contract amount. However, the RFQ is issued pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes,which allows continuing contracts for future work provided that the assigned projects for design services are less than $2 million or for studies that are less than $200',000. Q11: Please provide the City's insurance requirements,they are not included in the RFQ. - All: As stated in Section 0100, Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions, 12. Negotiations, pg. 7 of the RFQ, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Q12: Appendix A2. Question.2. Conflict of Interest.Will the consultant be required to submit a separate form/document submittal, or will it suffice to include a note in the submittal? Al2: Proposer should use discretion when responding to Appendix A2.Question 2.Conflict • of Interest. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext. 26263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission, Potential pro osers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "No Bid F " .uestionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. Sic ely, Ob I lex Der rocurP ,ent Director • RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/17/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION, COMMISSION ITEM, AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA • RESOLUTION NO. 2020-31132 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE • CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2019-109-ND, FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE- QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES; FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC., THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; KIMLEY- HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; AND HNTB CORPORATION, THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. • WHEREAS, on September 1.1, 2019, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services; and WHEREAS, RFQ No. 2019-109-ND was released on September 13, 2019; and WHEREAS, a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on September 23, 2019; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the City received a total of 19 proposals, including proposals from A & P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp.; Atkins North America, Inc.; Hailstone Economic, LLC; Lambert Advisory, L.C.; The Corradino Group, Inc.; Caltran Engineering Group, Inc.; Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.; Carnahan, Proctor and Cross, Inc.; Choice Engineering Consultants, Inc.; Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc.; F.R. Aleman and Associates, Inc.; HBC Engineering Company; HNTB Corporation; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.; Kittelson & Associates, Inc.; Marlin Engineering, Inc.; McMahon & Associates, Inc.; Metric Engineering, Inc.; Stanley Consultants, Inc.; Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.; and • WSP USA, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the evaluation committee ("Evaluation Committee)" convened on November 21, 2019 to review and score proposals; and WHEREAS, the Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law, general information on the scope of services, and a copy of each proposal; and WHEREAS, the Committee's ranking for the top three (3) proposals was as follows: The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer; and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the qualifications of each firm, and having considered the Evaluation Committee's rankings, the City Manager is recommending that the Mayor and the City Commission authorize the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants, and further authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer. DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor, and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services; authorize the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services; further, authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., the second ranked proposer; and HNTB Corporation, the third ranked proposer; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this /5' day of J414/441 019. • Dan Gelber, Mayor ATTEST: f/z?IiRafael'E. G nadCiClerk <<` j 'APPROVED AS TO Th . FORM &LANGUAGE Frs-..` • &FOR EX CUTIQN s---7 : — pice_t. t' � "` 7 ,•..CORP ORA i.••i.IND/ ark City AI IC, ..:1 -0 + ‘ 1,; di..�' iv, f\ F:\PURC\Solicitations1201912019-109-ND_RFQ_Traffic_Engineering_Consulting_services\10 - Award Documents\RFQ-2019-109-ND-Resolution FINAL.doc C DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Resolutions-C7 R MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager DATE: January 15,2020 .t SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE.MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2019-109-ND FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution accepting the recommendation of the City Manager. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Many of the projects managed by the Transportation Department require traffic engineering services. Typically,the City has outsourced the required engineering services to qualified firms through a continuing contract established in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. In anticipation of the current contract's expiration of February 2020, the City issued the RFQ seeking to prequalify traffic engineering consulting firms for future work as they need may arise. The RFQ state that the City may award a pool of one (1) or more consultants eligible to be . considered for future work. Prequalifying firms now prior to the work actually being identified streamlines the process of deploying a firm once the need arise. The firm is selected in accordance with the referenced statute, which requires the City to determine the best firm for the work and negotiate a consultant service order based on pre-negotiated rates. The described process used by the City is typical of how most cities across the state engage engineering services in accordance with statutory requirements. ANALYSIS On September 11, 2019, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2019-109-ND for traffic engineering consultant services. On September 13, 2019, the RFQ was issued. A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on September 23, 2019. One addendum was issued to address questions from bidders.The Procurement Department issued bid notices to all firms registered for the discipline with wwwbidsync.com website, as well as other known bidders. In total,over 8,000 firms were notified of which 76 accessed the advertised solicitation. RFQ responses were due and received on October 28, 2019. The City received a total of 19 proposals from the firms included in Attachment A. Page 796 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA The Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager convened on November 21,2019, to consider proposals received. The Committee was comprised of Michael Belush, Chief of Planning and Zoning, Planning Department; Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, Assistant Director, Transportation Department; Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability, Planning Department; and Doraida Rodriguez, Traffic Engineer III, Department of Transportation Public Works, Miami-Dade County. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. .S The evaluation process resulted in the proposers being ranked by the Evaluation Committee in the following order(See Attachment A): 1st.The Corradino Group, Inc. 2nd. Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 3rd. HNTB Corporation 4th. Caltran Engineering Group, Inc. 4th. McMahon&Associates, Inc. 6th. Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. 7th.Atkins North America, Inc. 8th. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 9th.Calvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc. 10th. Metric Engineering, Inc. 11th. Stanley Consultants, Inc. 12th. Kittelson&Associates, Inc. 13th. F.R.Aleman and Associates, Inc. 14th.Carnahan, Proctor and Cross, Inc. 15th.Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 16th.WSP USA, Inc. 17th.A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 18th. Choice Engineering Consultants, Inc. 19th. HBC Engineering Company A summary of the three top-ranked firms, based on the information provided by each firm, follows: The Corradino Group, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, The Corradino Group, Inc.was established in 1970 and is headquartered in South Florida. The Corradino Group, Inc. has provided planning, engineering design, environmental and construction management services to government entities and the private sector for 49 years. Its success is built on delivering a quality product developed through the inclusiveness of the planning process and the effectiveness of communication. Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. was founded as a transportation firm in 1967 and is now one of the largest and fastest growing full- service consulting firms in Florida. As a transportation engineering, planning, landscape architecture, surveying, and environmental services firm, Kimley-Hom offers a wide range of Page 797 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA consulting services to local, regional, national, and international clients. Its staff will offer the City ' critical insights into practical program approaches for ongoing traffic engineering services. HNTB Corporation According to the information provided by the firm, HNTB Corporation was founded in 1914 and has built a reputation for excellence and innovation. HNTB represents four of the state's five expressway enterprises serving as a General Engineering Consultant or Project Manager for Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Central Florida Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and the Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority. They have provided general transportation and traffic engineering services to the City since May of 2018. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. CONCLUSION While the City is fortunate to have received such a robust response to the RFQ, the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department is insufficient to keep all firms busy and interested in City projects. When considering the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department, it appears that awarding to three (3)firms would provide a sufficient pool of resources while allowing for each fimi to receive enough work to stay interested. After reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee process, I concur with the Evaluation Committee and find The Corradino Group, Inc., Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., and HNTB Corporation,the three top ranked firms respectively, to be the best qualified firms to establish a pre-qualified pool of consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services.These firms have strong teams with a wealth of knowledge in the City of Miami Beach and neighboring municipalities. The three (3)teams have direct familiarity with the City's boards, land-use regulations and/or the City's vision. Additionally, some of the prior experience provided by the firms demonstrated their ability to carry out innovative ideas, solutions, and recommendations. Further, each firm has performed well on prior projects with the City. For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., as the second ranked proposer, and HNTB Corporation, as the third ranked proposer, and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. Applicable Area Citywide Js this a Resident Right to Does this item utilize G.O. Know item? Bond Funds? Yes No Strategic Connection Mobility-Increase multi-modal mobility citywide and connectivity regionally. • Page 798 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Legislative Tracking Transportation and Mobility/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: Description D Attachment A r < I Page 799 of 1618 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA rilifilifiliti 111. . 11 g nu. 81I. :TF1 ,1fl- U� 1 r. !tilh::IJ1Iti I'J� 91 1„1I ' 9 I I I i A I P Tin' 3 4 I 1n of M .13 f ., 0'0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 J V N Ip A tp yiP m m yq �gOj ,< oo I �'. V��i.W+Ntp+�o�aw NIPP,P iJV • g d 1 ! Y I 1 . 1 ! 1il ' � ! li O o a a a a a 0 o to a a a a o a a a a q Io IOIO010101010 O Oio 0I0 10:0'010 010 O Og r; I ; I I I i I i R i t . il - J , JI1 Qp SI 1 m i�pm mm • ki I�N SIR W1�N f0+fOiO fNil tJ 4'18;31 N N V Q f n 14Ain'-10+Ow"wtpV+ gePN ma Ranking ty I I I IR i �tpp m mm JJI I m �JI .,O 0NIO 0,611g�ImpIW• INItVii1.OI�'W: • m10N NW Y iIIIi . ` • f1 . . ' • II i ' IIi 111 1 1 iI 2' C ;oio 0101010i0!oi010'i0 O 01010 0 0 0 � 11 T,� II . 1 11 ! 7pr I M as1p Ip ` .asG c oiN1Vito V'mJmimmmNN0 .1NN V V O�NIP 10 W N P O V w m O N P to Z 1 IrrI wi+1VtA N NIr''I0 Im'+m, p.���� m O N-+04N, i0• I I 10 NI tJ N Olw Y I i+! - •• I ; ! 1 Q D N.0, 0• V ,o J1w,,lc,IV 0 4-4,-10 I Ica,.yNIm•.•PS CP S,uiN•10•A.W.,ImIN 01.0-4 i}Q I LI , I11 ' 1 I 010,00000000000 11 ' 10000 0 0 2. ffffff 1 § I.1 0 V 0 toi.1 a 0 v ii w v1 'V•0•V V Vl m w:V N 10 AIPI1�l0 wiN,fp A!�I�Im•P P 01V - 1 I1 i i t ::I.Ft N PMA 1011,,N fOl�+4:18;-•,I,-, 0„ Raidng Ii. I €18$8SI1§iii�388N$ ofolSlII 8 V.81; ) 1 I 1 11 I '; • !!!Illi I J I I • , . $ o•o1O.0 010 000iololoiolo,a a 0:0;0.0 i 1 •• I • . . 1 . 1 if 1 Igo tIZIEIo•N:inlalolf:,° it SIBISIE INig 1 i I L1•+:1 Yi1Y1 rSltpltp!NI-.Ntm` +ii11-.•IAi'p flanking N 01 II : 1 1 N•AIN1A:I�1•A•+I•.0 N N a:tT'wIN INIs 1•aai LP 1 . •AIN:+O.OiA'AIO N+N 14111p•+ftp I I I 1,I i 1,1 1 I . ! ! .- im;,1��,Alp O.ININIYlm.f/,0 „,,,,„:,..!...,..4!...,1flanking Coversheet Page 1 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Resolutions-C7 R MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales,City Manager DATE: January 15,2020 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 2019-109-ND, FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ESTABLISH A POOL OF PRE-QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS FOR SPECIFIC TASKS RELATING TO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES; FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC.,THE FIRST RANKED PROPOSER; KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., THE SECOND RANKED PROPOSER; AND HNTB CORPORATION, THE THIRD RANKED PROPOSER; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH EACH OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSERS UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution accepting the recommendation of the City Manager. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Many of the projects managed by the Transportation Department require traffic engineering services. Typically, the City has outsourced the required engineering services to qualified firms through a continuing contract established in accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes. In anticipation of the current contract's expiration of February 2020, the City issued the RFQ seeking to prequalify traffic engineering consulting firms for future work as they need may arise.The RFQ state that the City may award a pool of one (1) or more consultants eligible to be considered for future work. Prequalifying firms now prior to the work actually being identified streamlines the process of deploying a firm once the need arise. The firm is selected in accordance with the referenced statute, which requires the City to determine the best firm for the work and negotiate a consultant service order based on pre-negotiated rates. The described process used by the City is typical of how most cities across the state engage engineering services in accordance with statutory requirements. ANALYSIS On September 11,2019,the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications(RFQ)2019-109-ND for traffic engineering consultant services. On September 13, 2019, the RFQ was issued. A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on September 23,2019.One addendum was issued to address questions from bidders. The Procurement Department issued bid notices to all firms registered for the discipline with www.bidsync.com website, as well as other known bidders. In total, over 8,000 firms were notified of which 76 accessed the advertised solicitation. RFQ responses were due and received on October 28,2019.The City received a total of 19 proposals from the firms included in Attachment A. The Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager convened on November 21,2019,to consider proposals received.The Committee was comprised of Michael Belush, Chief of Planning and Zoning, Planning Department; Josiel Ferrer-Diaz, Assistant Director, Transportation Department; Rogelio Madan, Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability, Planning Department; and Doraida Rodriguez, Traffic Engineer III, Department of Transportation Public Works, Miami-Dade County. The Committee was provided an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Govemment Sunshine Law. The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal. The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ. The evaluation process resulted in the proposers being ranked by the Evaluation Committee in the following order(See Attachment A): 1st.The Corradino Group,Inc. 2nd.Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3rd.HNTB Corporation 4th.Caltran Engineering Group,Inc. 4th.McMahon&Associates,Inc. 6th.Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc. 7th.Atkins North America, Inc. 8th.Marlin Engineering,Inc. 9th.Calvin,Giordano&Associates,Inc. 10th.Metric Engineering,Inc. 11th.Stanley Consultants,Inc. 12th.Kittelson&Associates,Inc. https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=15414&Me... 1/15/2020 Coversheet Page 2 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 13th.F.R.Aleman and Associates,Inc. 14th.Camahan, Proctor and Cross,Inc. 15th.Stantec Consulting Services,Inc. 16th.WSP USA,Inc. 17th.A&P Consulting Transportation Engineers Corp. 18th.Choice Engineering Consultants,Inc. 19th.HBC Engineering Company A summary of the three top-ranked firms,based on the information provided by each firm,follows: The Corradino Group,Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, The Corradino Group, Inc. was established in 1970 and is headquartered in South Florida.The Corradino Group,Inc.has provided planning,engineering design,environmental and construction management services to government entities and the private sector for 49 years. Its success is built on delivering a quality product developed through the inclusiveness of the planning process and the effectiveness of communication. Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. According to the information provided by the firm, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.was founded as a transportation firm in 1967 and is now one of the largest and fastest growing full-service consulting firms in Florida.As a transportation engineering,planning, landscape architecture,surveying,and environmental services firm,Kimley-Hom offers a wide range of consulting services to local, regional,national,and international clients.Its staff will offer the City critical insights into practical program approaches for ongoing traffic engineering services. HNTB Corporation According to the information provided by the firm, HNTB Corporation was founded in 1914 and has built a reputation for excellence and innovation. HNTB represents four of the state's five expressway enterprises serving as a General Engineering Consultant or Project Manager for Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Central Florida Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and the Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority. They have provided general transportation and traffic engineering services to the City since May of 2018. FINANCIAL INFORMATION The cost of the related services, determined upon successful negotiations, are subject to funds availability approved through the City's budgeting process. CONCLUSION While the City is fortunate to have received such a robust response to the RFQ, the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department is insufficient to keep all firms busy and interested in City projects.When considering the amount of work anticipated by the Transportation Department,it appears that awarding to three (3)firms would provide a sufficient pool of resources while allowing for each firm to receive enough work to stay interested. After reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee process, I concur with the Evaluation Committee and find The Corradino Group, Inc.,Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.,and HNTB Corporation,the three top ranked firms respectively,to be the best qualified firms to establish a pre-qualified pool of consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services.These firms have strong teams with a wealth of knowledge in the City of Miami Beach and neighboring municipalities.The three(3)teams have direct familiarity with the City's boards, land-use regulations and/or the City's vision. Additionally, some of the prior experience provided by the firms demonstrated their ability to carry out innovative ideas,solutions,and recommendations.Further, each firm has performed well on prior projects with the City. For the reasons stated herein, I recommend that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution authorizing the Administration to establish a pool of pre-qualified consultants for specific tasks relating to traffic engineering services; authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with The Corradino Group, Inc., as the first ranked proposer; Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.,as the second ranked proposer,and HNTB Corporation,as the third ranked proposer;and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with each of the foregoing proposers upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. Applicable Area Citywide Is this a Resident Right to Does this item utilize G.O. Know item? Bond Funds? Yes No Strategic Connection Mobility-Increase multi-modal mobility citywide and connectivity regionally. Legislative Tracking Transportation and Mobility/Procurement ATTACHMENTS: https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=15414&Me... 1/15/2020 C versheet Page 3 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Description o Attachment A D Resolution https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=15414&Me... 1/15/2020 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F582607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA ATTACHMENT B SOLICITATION RFQ AND ADDENDA DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Procurement Department V 1 ( /�l �/ 1 I /""1 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES(the RFQ) October 18,2019 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by stFikethreugh and additions are underlined). 1. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A: Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet Exhibit B: Proposals Submitted for RFQ 2014-116-SR Exhibit C: Commission Memorandum for Issuance 2. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED: Q1: Is there an estimated budget and plan holders list available? Q g Al: At the present time there is no estimated budget. Please refer to Exhibit A, for the Pre- Proposal Sign-in Sheet. Q2: I am looking for copies of the submitted (and winning RFQs)for the previous contract with regards to Traffic Engineering Consultant Services, A2: Please refer to Exhibit B, Proposals Submitted for RFQ 2014.116-SR. Q3: Will the City be uploading the sign-up sheet from the Pre-Submittal meeting last week regarding RFQ 2019-109-ND? A3: Please refer to Exhibit A, Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet. Q4: Will the City choose a pool of consultants? A4: Through this RFQ, the City seeks to create a pool of qualified firms that can expeditiously provide the City with traffic engineering consulting services when the need arises. Q5: Is the City looking for a complete team of consultants? A5: Don't understand the question.The service is for peer reviewing. Companies can submit by themselves or prime and subconsultant submission. Q6: Does the scope of services related to the bulleted items in Tab 3 on page 10? Is there more detailed scope of services? A6: The purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified firms (as determined by the City). Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope. When the need for traffic engineering consulting services arises the City and the selected consultant will negotiate scope and cost. RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/18/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA /` IA Atv\ I BE /� C Procurement Department 1 VLJ /"'1 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Q7: Is there a minimum and/or maximum of teams to be selected as part of the pool of consultants? A7: There is no minimum or maximum number of teams the City intends to select as part of the pool of consultants. Q8: Are there any DBE commitment requirements?Will the selection criteria reflect this requirement? A8: There are no DBE commitment requirements. Q9: Has the selection committee been defined? Is it possible to share the members of the selection committee? A9: Please refer to Exhibit C, Commission Memorandum for Issuance. • Q10: Is there an overall maximum contract amount of dollars awarded by consultant? A10: There is no overall maximum contract amount. However,the RFQ is issued pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, which allows continuing contracts for future work provided that the assigned projects for design services are less than $2 million or for studies that are less than $200;000. Q11: Please provide the City's insurance requirements,they are not included in the RFQ. • All: As stated in Section 0100, Instructions to Respondents & General Conditions, 12. Negotiations, pg. 7 of the RFQ, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Q12: Appendix A2. Question.2. Conflict of Interest. Will the consultant be required to submit a separate form/document submittal, or will it suffice to include a note in the submittal? Al2: Proposer should use discretion when responding to Appendix A2.Question 2. Conflict• of Interest. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual namedbelow, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Delgado 305-673-7000 ext. 26263 nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential pro osers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFQ are requested to complete and return the "No Bid F " .uestionnaire with the reason(s)for not submitting a proposal. Si c:- ely, I lex Der, rocur ent Director RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/17/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-682862A08CDA Procurement Department 1 V ►.I/�1 V 1 IA4s 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov • 1 EXHIBIT A Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/17/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MEAMIB ErAC CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES „� - a-..�,' •'�.,er m=+> .F .y - --cw�.w-. .> `�t cts.-.7 ,'r� '4s .--T.c s'"'a-xat- rae.• aw*�S,c.hW.xF��.�{'._'S 3�� E t �1c Id'.tIIL cu 'nSre'R � a ¢ ' .,° i,''' h- a .F' a t�,' 4 t"" "•.k+' s.:i �§Lam'':t "ry+',-"°#n't�,� �i?.�iAti f1� 1� 'Fw• tie�` §'�,': ps r ..7 ' c..,.x nar�_,�t��., .. �=<_u'�.w�.au.ui�a�ey�,r,�a��_ za.<n*' .m�_.... -T�i,��,Jab�n ri.:•''��..,,»,M .�._, .,......U,3 Ke-.e., 3 i* �;..,. t..,n,.,t`_�'*�3ri,icv_i?_ �-'�,��.' �>,� a e)sor i r 113) CQs Dc-) c qi,.7 pi-M0142) 4 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMIBEACH • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH • PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING • SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES it 5t'Pt,o 'r 'i ,,. - r ] ¢ � +, • NAVA � qt., xL,' c�1ar" " } � :^r " . ,� 5 , � V x F .u" n * ,K: s " .a-. cy-ay �; s kt;> . x n? . Wr iy z 3&, e :.;,:r6417- 7.:,4 1 ` �N-TYEA xI 4 � EA . rx, .. L -• rt . :-' s u - E . .e. �, . . . . . a.a:_ '&., .ka.. zSI � � �I/s�� k`I ' U ' Lo 114. lF �C55, �"b 3, „ Pt k-� �vs Q�oc.Irtnsee.,Co AA_ c 7"3 -t s 1 �(th-. 14:6 ted i Cres ki va • 9 - KriS r kdv . cSSr Sf v - 1 :gall � o �� � 6-ix.,:, ewe-5 i � t A.\ soc.z,, g- ( C �a�e.5aCjjc 5D1 16'S . Gbvv� �3so2�7? 2 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA f Mi .. L Rff i.: C I I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 � TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES ri I �.a' -- ' xnz•,. 3^S r ax.2x ,� _ .i ,f -e-.-.F "" 'T4 ,t. fsk^..�a - �,c"'� -'•`:s? j'� "x - i r I ' �E , -�' t, c x 3 t. ➢s .gl.:*1 " ' '"�'Sru '-zo , x i N.�11 : ,��fk. ,fh, .:- .w.� ,-,i4,:‘._._ ._:-',k,i0 wo im `�3, o5:,,f uie ,`,2'P,-- .4 v e p '`,® v# -..s s- " «.x,„„ ,•r: +T G-c ,5,,,4a .. rc a _ yr x ,''� + .5..{ x .7'1t.� i c r 5 5.:4 1 a if.q ' , r t �-.w.' ft ,.-.ff�``. _ $ ;i3..?: .eh _ t ClI CIs ,iat-6 S` -ec, uvoiA\ti\D\ 30') 144F) 211 Gl'IA/ 1 E.4696:4 ‘;y6ona,,raiitt‘,6 l �. - p „, , Lo�.�.�€ /2/n I t.-ve 5 6.-1,- 4,1„G-G ,ter 36'0—"` 341257, ..--- tip" a 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Mi :iV .iBEi: Cl CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES - � . �� � 'Y+ ��-.. t ..�iR°"a� +'"� � ��p`aj''�'�'Tjr'�'.�' s j"�`�'�"""�Esc iv y ,.�' � 4.:,1 t o F ..z:, £ T �y',g t i - r`jn t. 5'it .;�ifouit-T b sib dery ?' �: { ��s� gym �,�'� 4 'ara� � a sP¢.,. mT.. 4Ant _ Fz�� � � � uyh� �3 Tr rt.�'`��s�J e�r ��^�1 ,d8° .t r X S ,`� a� t 'kk s� r. .�a'4� .' x '4 as t,gt i',_`sn,�,.� t i,4'{R.r,' .: I ntfiNgi �._. �r?;.,,�s�`�, �;:47,,:01;.„4 ...s 3� �+ kAl402/A- 14/ 4. id o lc� cs0 A:72 4re 44„), vN PS- 51V.-- c'I n ar Gr, a P . ��s� � �- (�u>��. � , Cor. israJ� 16.E 23L2241.c !/ ©Mar.kanaail hmiwy,hoin.c 1,6 . 1S9 -$�L� air Gan �IORrA�AA l7. e 1^S'K-s3�-s►oa {� . A13►�<0 WSKI v(+MG�k-HoRN,CLr� Apatoni DA6u•wcy,� 4 i DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MtAWUBE. CH . . CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES atifitupt.latri,14-1 9 .. - � � i1 ., '"` � Ts3i � Y ` ' e " k t � . � xo " � � vent Yr � L� .— . _ a t a »" „ - � d _* _ --, 41 s rP .l fj Zii Natalia Delgado Procurement- CMB 305-673-700011' nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Ext. 26263 c, .. .70,si-el Teforee6-iy,2 te4 MCyou "6931 C..1\ a�op (yck" 0,As. ,431/4-e-\ ..,_,..c7"---5-” . 3Q_...kk.k.extgs,-D C,4,4.t.tut (.7 . '.f°I'` -le re 6,9cte. ►. D)1 -- fry c". e� � CSC rnie ecv� Ce`�tad/Nv,cam_ A.t---� -73� s � t VA-1-81210 2io Ott'lc: k1Q - 3.1 7 r3 �//, veto.,tea{ cr0e l� INC• CSM d a i i s� y let AI -7-6� (Iry ,vg-766 . ///_____ ra Ipietn11-1878• Com , C rra. M t ti-P`c 7s-13$--5' SV(�G�Vt eSCGt+T f f jN[�i'3 T c iii •('Gw 111 / aoii�n P-trc-z- s Ars oc. oS_3i2 -31�io // S�SFl�1� C� ,rc��l S5AciA Qbpiuii iefts,ccon 3 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MMIBEA C . CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES X h.5r1^Yu 'f}C j hY' t - - gp, s 9�-. C T` a 5 a ''� 4 • '�'%"�•'* � a �i� U' 'o4-t ,4 s"K iA TO ` $" 4-7-,-,17P—,6,:,4, ,*.E.. .mac �. ,F :� .43.14,4,"..4t7::'; T ♦r"(.2,1171.44.61-,..-,_.. ( 'zg 1JA F P 3, tf- '*�°3 i Y +�-f 'ti ` ;-,'4 4 2�w dY• "'1 t ,,++��� ���b�� � f t$i �'�' {[,��-u,-a�' ,..� "'ra�r Re� � `�'�i'` �`3����.F � .u� ris �� ��_- � 3" �: ✓,.y r s •b d .) d7_:':"...... ,-»,a,,. s4� .. -= '�,+"' 5 x".$ � + a.41;1,75-w,.�'°'� _':::1):4-'-'--5441''1"4—' ,,, .i'a- c�.rw_ J.,. ¢ .-`��' r,, s�u,3;."-_�'cr-...a»�..�t�i. = +«. .e;i...e .e:j,.• P4��. mss., 'S-[.. ax.,.a <..aa�- .,.�:x».:�ax int r� G(rri � �`f a� i . v'�, co4•1 �7 'e� _. I 1 i i •j 2 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 TITLE: RFQ-2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES � ��,, 'f 4 '`K ,M,,.. . .a��x,.��n' ,� �. f .w!.'�33 ��f r� . .. .r� x�tx`:3 7 '�"� � n-7§ r 9 .rw; �..�'S '�:. F°:'-��,'i� %c '�'` f'�� pias '=�" 'i .�� -'' ":":`,x-�7-3xzz;. � „_.x„.?..,,,„,,,,;;;„;,:;: ,:,:,.,__::; ,;:,- � U l' 171-'11>':-4„.;.,-...‘,,,;„1„.'IS "'s x natu,ce r y�i a ,.G y- �^. 3 3 i �� ' - 1 z. -.?. t 'fit '�. ,f�, f '^ a:. x F�. e )'' rt '�. +� +e LYS 1 �a 1-' 'e r f 3�' , t�.:. �.i r ;'SS zr; j,,; gyp,.4 " v. r .�” 3t ,: ,s g >r 4 a. s `�' c it'IA �r e. �..,A. N..el'... _., .tr • 4",.R�*Y � F.�.•SM n a -^'3�.- Y" ,.`.t-+.. S=r+# : Ia yTW 1-1 A- �1 --1 f-A-1-40o 5 Inc - '>I-' p = SSoGltci� (1G Z- n Ler6s)r;e rYl�rnh� - c_,�i�S- �tr�zS6 / . i e..,,,,--i 1E i i���'rpe_oJr, .5-le") ~ f c�scE ✓✓�L�ecn^ C rrti. nt 6Lto65C. f1,11_2____\., i r )(div 1168- MitNIA4 J 1/4.)G3(&)e- u04 9G4 - I t_o�+ grit,-50416 Yi-- 1 66e- Kr-A r")orLc�,�/Pe .eve/ ! I aleX Q .,1ed i- Cirea4-ives q5y ; Pieresctn 8 GA at1 ed %i-cac 6ges . LI I2. O o e'. 1. - a .Va.OVO- ba.e., P ha iew61 4-7 01 a I- 0/,'ver, l orn os) 905- if_11),//sor . ,2. li °/ n i i I i 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MIA/vIBEACH • CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: September 23, 2019 • TITLE: RFQ-2019-109—ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES `7 i^'.� 5A EYS�?�5-R.i,y xyf�, .,c..t s, t tit ca ...*i..1.4,,„„_,.,_, .h� 3 „�tzcil�,a ,�".,y E,Cy,v .� F°�:, °-*1 u z � ,tt '�d5c!4 altir � �t'y+ ��4y t.=;« ��y��yy�;t -�. z�--�^."z1� .,-e^- � - ",�' #it -c�'-n c^: y3; x + -amu' 1 1. gthfa`:�1ivtt ,' t`' �r'a' f - ,.�„x t„,A ._ a.[i �T �,'` -�, y �rTj �-, I r� 'rbc. +ft �,a -.�[ k .� �. 5; s 4,142.41-14,4,,i. 7f S ”---=,- A1-''''-'441414' as,'. $4L Ai j: "�'-`'�+.si Y � ,+� ° ^xM'.. 3 `w A:��g�G a* � i .a�.. :3 -4 ,K,,- =i-, 7 ' r, ;, .4 "'z�'`';; a a-w T ''y'"S K° �, yrd s �- i '✓' . -4-;' ... �,�.0... ,P a o.�...,. ,. ���.� �..��:.."7�. �.. ,<„ a..tom ` ._ "% �.,�'2L..,.�' , �..arn�v�. �i. xL+"��,..,.mse� .�,�;�F� '�a ".` "*�-.-� Natalia Delgado Procurement- CMB 305-673-7000 ' nataliadelgado@miamibeachfl.gov Ext. 26263 • \lemic. 4,7' 47-S 3 -s-/y.04"9 ,.., SC,/4/eT77.'-/'� . ✓;4;e4/ 'C/9ne f/ 4-- a k\vss 0,1-\ -c�&e�'�r\'1 \--\\\/AS 34A0 to it ���- 090 t16ssaM.6tbk1 G to 10AG \ yJIPPornr o��,17 (q oup.0C3 i.. I l 1 • DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA M /1, n � 1BEACH Procurement Department A �/ 1 I 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov I 7 I { EXHIBIT B Proposals Submitted for RFQ ,2014-116-SR RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/17/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA I ATKI N S • ss 11_1.! -.tea' S '. < REQ vNn ` ' ; r _ Irv:- + Z flint,1 ' • • • Q>n n A A "„>r,zr- ..`--'_^ . .r,. ..� I "" l7 WV Q�WV W. 7 'Y 1 • t l .f� .� :.- : i i �, _-- • n -44,0 V, . -L,j7,' ":iJ. - . ' gum ...le me am se. OM MO cu 3 City of Miami Beach .� t Statement of Qualifications for - _ iraffkt. engineering ,__ ".-� t►► - h Consulting Services Y I,;t+_ „` -- 4-titti FF o ri eD Solicitation No. 2014-116-SR I April 3, 2014 _. - �s o m -1. --- - , = a . h5 ��. O , - N P1 - <` ti. — rF ....-_ , h f1 D o . . I co i.. r '' ' ,li I O = r • .. v", 1 - -..�\ 144 !�., • c....../ Plan Design Enable f It," j DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 7 Q CrD 3 o fD 3 c co F.• in cu fD rD Tab 1 : Cover letter and minimum qualifications requirements DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 1 1 . Cover letter and minimum qualifications requirements The Atkins team has the expertise and availability to perform the project. 1.1 Cover letter and table of contents The following pages include our cover letter, which includes Atkins' primary contact, and table of contents. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA worp.. RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services ( 2 A T K I N S Atkins North America, Inc. 2001 Northwest 107th Avenue Miami, Florida 33172 Telephone:+1.305.592.7275 Fax: +1.305.599.3809 www.atkinsglobal.com/northamerica April 3, 2014 Ms. Sandra M. Rico, Senior Procurement Specialist City of Miami Beach Department of Procurement Management 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 RE: Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2014-116-SR for Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Dear Ms. Rico and Selection Committee Members: Experienced, responsive, and committed—these characteristics define our approach to meeting your traffic engineering service needs. Atkins has reviewed and conducted many traffic impact studies for development projects throughout Miami-Dade and Broward Counties. We have worked with municipalities such as the City of Miami Beach (City)and City of Coral Gables to ensure that the highest standards of traffic engineering are taken into consideration during the planning and design of projects. The City has a unique historic and tourist character, which attracts visitors year round and increases the demand for new developments. Atkins understands the importance of implementing effective solutions to various transportation challenges, which arise from the City's dynamic nature. We will develop practical, yet out-of-the-box solutions tailored to address traffic conditions within the City. Some examples of traffic impact studies that we have reviewed for the City include the Saxony Redevelopment, 1155 Collins Avenue, Cadillac Hotel, Baoli restaurant, and Block 1 Hotel. Experienced.This project demands staff experienced with traffic engineering in urban development areas. Our team will be led by project manager, Darlene Fernandez, PE, who has worked for the Florida Department of Transportation and the City. Ms. Fernandez understands the sensitivities and needs of municipalities and the challenges presented by developments in small cities. Her prior experience reviewing traffic impact studies for the City's Public Works Department as part of the development review process makes her the ideal project lead for this effort. Our team also includes staff experienced and qualified in all technical elements required by the scope of services. Our combined team has experience working with planning and zoning review boards as well as traffic, transportation engineering, and planning personnel. Responsive.We understand that projects will be time sensitive when working with a developer and that municipalities have a responsibility to diligently move projects through the review process. We are focused on meeting all deadlines and providing quick turnarounds on all reports and documentation needed. Our experience with these types of studies will decrease the response time required to keep this project on schedule and on budget. Additionally, we will support the City's public involvement and public meeting process to ensure that the review process does not impede project progress. Committed.We are focused on the City's and residents' needs in the community. Atkins is committed to supporting the City as it explores the benefits and potential impacts of new developments and redevelopments. We will work closely with the City's leadership and staff to support their efforts to make the best decision. We are committed to always providing quality, cost-effective services and maintaining successful working relationships. We appreciate the opportunity to present our qualifications and express our strong desire to continue to develop a successful and long-lasting working relationship with the City. The proposer and primary contact for purposes of this solicitation are: Proposer: Atkins North America, Inc. Proposer primary contact: Darlene Fernandez, PE 2001 Northwest 107th Avenue ( Miami, Florida 33172 Tel: 305.514.3232 I Fax: 305.594.8616 I darlene.fernandez@atkinsglobal.com Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 678.247.2585 or john.hibbard@atkinsglobal.com. Sincerely, Atkins /airJ�'- 1o;n L. Hibbard, PE Vice President/Practice Manager 0001.039184.0414 Atkins ! SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 13 Table of contents 1. Cover letter and minimum qualifications requirements 1 • 1 .1 Cover letter and table of contents 1 • 1 .2 Response certification, questionnaire, and requirements affidavit (Appendix A) 4 • 1 .3 Minimum qualifications requirements 51 2. Experience and qualifications 63 • 2.1 Qualifications of proposing firm 63 • 2.2 Qualifications of proposer team 66 • 2.3 Financial capacity 77 3. Scope of services proposed 79 Appendix 85 • RFQ exceptions 85 • Insurance 85 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 4 1.2 Response certification, questionnaire, and requirements affidavit (Appendix A) As requested in the request for qualifications (RFQ), attached is our fully completed and executed Appendix A. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4F05-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 5 Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Sandra M. Rico 305.673.7000 x 6230 srico@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Atkins North America, Inc. No of Years in Business:54 No of Years in Business Locally:54 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: Post, Buckley, Schuh&Jernigan; PBS&J; PBS&J, an Atkins company;Atkins FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 4030 West Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 700 CITY:Tampa STATE:Florida ZIP CODE:33607 TELEPHONE NO.:813.282.7275 TOLL FREE NO.:800.477.7275 FAX NO.:813.282.9767 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS:2001 NW 107th Avenue CITY:Miami STATE:Florida ZIP CODE:33172-2507 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT:Darlene Fernandez, PE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.:305.514.3232 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.:800.597.7275 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL:darlene.fernandez@atkinsglobal.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 59-0896138 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116SR Appendix A—Page 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 6 1. Miami Beach Based(Local Vendor.Is proposer claiming Miami Beach based firm status? YES I NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming Miami Beach vendor status shall submit a Business Tax Receipt issued by the City of Miami Beach and the proof of residency requirement,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3747,to demonstrate that the Proposer is a Miami Beach Based Vendor. 2. Veteran Owned Business.Is ro oser claiming a veteran owned business status? YES ✓ NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal govemment,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 3. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposals must disclose,in their Statement of Qualifications,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates Please see attached. 4. References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. Please see attached. 5. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation.Has proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non- erformance by an •ublic sector agency? YES 0 NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 6. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Please see attached. 7. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request. The Code shall,at a minimum, require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including, among others, the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. Please see attached. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A—Page 2 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 7 8. Living Wage. Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code, as same may be amended from time to time, Proposer shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: • Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers(CPI-U)Miami/Ft. Lauderdale,issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding,no annual index shall exceed three percent(3%).The City may also,by resolution,elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year, if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposals'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option,immediately deem said proposer as non-responsive,and may further subject proposer to additional penalties and fines, as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required. By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 9. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks,the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals,to provide"Equal Benefits"to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses. The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach,Florida;and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? ,/ YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to domestic partners of employees? ./ YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other' section any additional benefits not already specified. Note: some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave; other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner, such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners _ Health �/ ✓ Sick Leave ✓ ✓ Family Medical Leave �/ ✓ Bereavement Leave If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control, (e.g., there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance. To comply on this basis, you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application (attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager, or his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 10. Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a proposal, Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A-Page 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 8 proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work;may not submit proposals,Statement of Qualifications,or replies on leases of real property to a public entity;may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor,supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 11. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 /176 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. Miami Beath REQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A-Page 4 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 9 DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion, the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications,as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is govemed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto, such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A-Page 5 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 10 PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification,Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Martin Brown Senior Vice President/Chief Information Officer Signature of is uthorized Representative: Date: T /eV;5,/ April 1,2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this 1st day of April ,2014,personally appeared before me Martin Brown who County of Miami-Dade ) stated that ( he is the Senior Vice President/chief Information Officer of Atkins North America,Inc., a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: •sx-+'ct — Notary blic for the State of'Florida Julia Forgione My Commission Expires: November 4.2015 . o.Z 1Voys, JULIA FORGIONE I ?°r `<,' Notary Public-State of Florida , 1•T. My Comm.Expires Nov 4,2015 ' :�,,'°F � Commission#EE 137344 ' Bonded Through National Notary Assn Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A-Page 6 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F582607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 111 CORPORATE RESOLUTION OF ATKINS NORTH AMERICA,INC. RESOLVED,that the below named officers are authorized to execute documents on behalf of Atkins North America,Inc.: L.Joe Boyer Chief Executive Officer/President Barry J.Schulz President/Chief Operating Officer William R.Winkler President Thomas F.Barry,Jr. Senior Vice President Steve J.Levin Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer Martin H.Brown Senior Vice President/Chief Information Officer Kenneth J.Burns,Jr. Senior Vice President W.Bradley Dennard Senior Vice President C.Ernest Edgar,IV Senior Vice President/General Counsel/Secretary Jorge C.Figueredo Senior Vice President Marvin N.Fisher Senior Vice President Richard W.Galloway Senior Vice President Michael C.Hogan Senior Vice President Donna M.Huey Senior Vice President Justin P.Jones Senior Vice President Amir Kangari Senior Vice President Robert S.Lawson Senior Vice President Steven C.Malecki Senior Vice President Eric S.McLaurin Senior Vice President Victor P.Poteat Senior Vice President David D.Quinn Senior Vice President Benton L.Rudolph Senior Vice President Ernesto Aguilar Vice President Dennis J.Ceams Vice President Jonathan H.McDonald Vice President Glenn F.Myers Vice President Darrell A.Nance Vice President FURTHER RESOLVED,that the following named officers are authorized to attest to the signatures of officers executing documents on behalf of Atkins North America,Inc: C.Ernest Edgar,IV Senior Vice President/General Counsel/Secretary James R. Steele,Jr. Vice President/Assistant Secretary Rene de los Rios Vice President/Assistant Secretary Jayanth Jayaram Vice President/Assistant Secretary This resolution is adopted as of October 8,2013 and remains in effect until a succeeding resolution is adopted. �l L. 'f �1 w C.Ernest Edgar,IV,Secretary Corporate Seal Zs SEAL cz c: 1960 IP 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 112 3. Conflict of Interest. All Proposals must disclose, MC Harry Associates in their Statement of Qualifications, the name(s) Mr. James W. Piersol, AIA, Principal of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family 2780 SW Douglas Road, Suite 302 member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who Miami, Florida 33133 is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. 305.445.3765 I jpiersol@mcharry.com Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any Scope of services City employee who owns, either directly or indirectly, Atkins conducted a traffic impact study and an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the alternative evaluation study for the Primary Learning Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. Center and iPreparatory Academy located in Atkins is not aware of any conflicts of interest. downtown Miami. As part of the traffic study, Atkins 4. References & Past Performance. Proposer shall reviewed and analyzed existing traffic conditions; submit at least three (3)references for whom the performed data collection, trip generation, trip proposer has completed work similar in size and distribution, and traffic assignments; analyzed nature as the work referenced in solicitation. existing and future conditions with the increase in enrollment; analyzed alternatives, and coordinated City of Coral Gables, Public Works with Miami-Dade County Public Schools (MDCPS) Ms. Yamilet Senespleda, PE, City Engineer and Miami-Dade County to ensure approval of the 2800 SW 72^d Avenue study. Miami, Florida 33155 305.460.5034 I ysenespleda@coralgables.com City of Coconut Creek Ms. Sheila N. Rose, AICP, Director, Department of Scope of services Sustainable Development Services include conducting and reviewing traffic 4800 West Copans Road impact studies, traffic counts, traffic calming and Coconut Creek, Florida 33063 parking issues, safety and operational studies, plans 954.973.6756 I srose@coconutcreek.net review, design, speed surveys, and intersection delay Scope of services studies within the City, among other services. Services include traffic engineering studies, general City of Miami Beach, Public Works engineering, planning services, cost-benefit analysis, Mr. Jose Gonzalez, PE, Transportation Manager land surveying, roadway design, and signal design, 1700 Convention Center Drive among other services. Miami Beach, Florida 33139 305.673.7080 josegonzalez@miamibeachfl.gov 6. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with, the Scope of services City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified Services include conducting and reviewing traffic in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. impact studies, developments of regional impact Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring (DRI), traffic circulation and parking issues, that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign developing conceptual improvement alternatives, Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall and the design of signal plans within the City, be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed among other services. therein, including disqualification of their Statement Synalovski Romanik Saye of Qualifications, in the event of such non- Mr. Manny Synalovski, AIA, LEED AP, Principal compliance. 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 500 Atkins is compliant with the City's Campaign Finance Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 954.961.6806 I msynalovski@synalvoski.com 2-490 of the City Code. Atkins has no campaign Scope of services contributions to the City of Miami Beach or any Services included the development of a traffic impact lobbyist working for the firm soliciting work with the study for 6372 Collins Avenue in the City of Miami City. Beach. The analysis included a determination of the Please note that The Atkins North America Holdings impact based on trip generation, a site visit, on-site Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WS and off-site traffic circulation including signage and Atkins plc. WS Atkins plc is a publicly-traded striping, evaluation of the sight distance triangle at corporation in the United Kingdom on the London the driveway, evaluation of the trip distribution and Stock Exchange (ATK). Atkins North America, Inc. traffic assignment based on the proposed circulation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Atkins North and an AutoTURN analysis for the accommodation America Holdings Corporation. The Atkins North of a loading zone within the property. Different America Holdings Corporation and Atkins North alternatives were evaluated including changes to the America, Inc. do not own shares in WS Atkins plc. site circulation. 0001,039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 113 7. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City We have included on pages 14-45 Atkins' Code of Resolution No. 2000-23879, each person or entity Conduct for business ethics and compliance. Atkins that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt will comply with all applicable governmental rules a Code of Business Ethics ("Code")and submit that and regulations including, among others, the conflict Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/ of interest, lobbying, and ethics provision of the City response or within five (5)days upon receipt of of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County. request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the 11. Acknowledgement of Addendum Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental We have included copies of Addendum No. 1 and rules and regulations including, among others, the No. 2 on pages 46-50. conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDAI 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 114 ATKI NS FAITHFUL GOULD Building for the future: K., Our values, principles, and standards 0 CO 4/ <'C/; Q Coo 4 - n v uoe ,,,,\, 081. iso Plan Design Enable DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA-4FD5 61C1-682862AOSCDA� 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services ( 15 Contents Message from CEO North America 3 Responsibilities to our fellow employees 17 Message from President of Faithful+Gould, Inc. 4 Safety,Health &Environment 17 Message from Operations Director of WS Atkins, Inc. 5 Drugs and alcohol 17 Diversity and fair treatment 17 Introduction 6 Workplace harassment 17 Employee privacy 18 Purpose and use of our code of conduct 8 Purpose and use of the code 9 Responsibilities to our shareholders 19 Asking questions and raising concerns 9 Use of company resources and assets 19 Where to go for help 9 Copyright 19 Violations and cooperating with internal investigations 10 Accuracy of books and records 20 Non-retaliation policy 10 Conflicts of interest 21 Note to employees 10 Records retention related to litigation or investigations 22 International trade 23 Responsibilities to our clients 11 Anti-money laundering 23 Quality performance 11 Communications with media 23 Gifts and entertainment 11 Honesty in communications and contracting 14 Responsibilities to our Gathering competitive information 14 suppliers and business partners 24 Anti-kickback and bribery policy 15 Government audits and investigations 15 Responsibilities to our communities where we live and work 25 Hiring government employees 16 Compliance with laws and regulations 25 Fair competition 16 Upholding professional standards 25 Organizational conflicts of interest 16 Respecting the environment 25 Community activities 25 Political activities and contributions 25 Lobbying 26 Acknowledgements&forms 27 Employee commitment 27 Thank you 28 Employee commitment form 29 Comments and suggestions 29 Where to go for help 31 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA 4FD5-61C1-682862A08CDA2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 116 Atkins Code of Conduct Building for the future: Our values, principles, and standards A message to all employees from our Chief Executive Officer As part of Atkins, we all have a responsibility to do what is right and to comply with the law. Our code of conduct for business ethics and compliance, 0(1:II Building for the future: Our values, principles,and standards, provides the guidelines to help us do that. Every employee of Atkins is required to behave in a manner that is consistent with the standards set forth in the code. If you do not understand something, you must seek counsel from your immediate supervisor, another manager or supervisor, our Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, or other company resources in Legal, Finance, or Human Resources. If an ethical dilemma or concern comes to your attention, it is your responsibility to let us know. How we conduct our business is every bit as important as what we do. We have worked hard to build and enhance our reputation, and I thank you for everything you have done to help us achieve that. Those we serve and partner with in the marketplace, as well as the communities where we live and work, have come to trust that we at Atkins will "do the right thing." Maintaining that trust is crucial to our continued success. I am confident that each one of you will follow the letter and the spirit of this code and help our company secure its bright future. Regards, L. Joe Boyer CEO, North America • _ The compass is commonly thought of as a device used to determine geographic direction. For Atkins,the compass represents the corporation's ethics and compliance program. It symbolizes Atkins'commitment to its code of conduct and the values, principles,and standards that provide direction for our employees in an increasingly �0F C O �� complex business environment.We all face ethical dilemmas in our professional decisions vQ and actions.The solutions are not always easy, but we do have choices—and when we \ G have questions,we can make integrity the compass that guides everything we do. U \ 3 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA 4FD5 61 C1-682862A08CDA� 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 17 A message from Paul Wood, President of Faithful+Gould, Inc. It is my pleasure to welcome you to Faithful+Gould, Inc.,one of the world's leading project consultancies. In: Faithful+Gould, Inc. is a great company to work for. Our success is built on hiring and then developing the very best people. Our standards are high, as are the rewards for those who join our team. The opportunity to draw from international expertise and work on some of the most demanding and prestigious construction challenges around the globe ensures career success. For this reason, it is important that we all do our part to ensure that our work is done ethically and in compliance with applicable rules and regulations. Should you encounter an issue as to ethical conduct, have a concern about how something is being done, or observe questionable practices, I encourage you to seek guidance in the Atkins Code of Conduct: Building for the future: Our values,principles,and standards for guidance,or by contacting your supervisor, HR representative, the Atkins Legal Department or the Whistleblower Hotline. Faithful+Gould will not permit retaliation when you make a report in good faith. Our work spans every environment and every sector and our staff are some of the world's leading experts, helping support clients with their knowledge and ability. As a member of the Atkins team,familiarize yourself with the Atkins Code of Conduct and refer to it from time to time.Together we are committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards and ensuring that Faithful+Gould continues its success. Sincerely, „re-0P. Paul G.Wood President, Faithful+Gould, Inc. 4 Bwiding for the future Our values,orfnoples,and standards Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA 4FD5-61C1-B82862AOSCDAo w 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 18 A letter from Kim Weninger, A Operations Director of WS Atkins, Inc. d WS Atkins, Inc. is a provider of high-end design and engineering for the oil it and gas, nuclear, renewables and power sectors.We deliver to our clients •I engineering solutions that draw on this experience interwoven with state of the art analysis techniques.We deliver innovative technical solutions for some F _i of the industry's greatest challenges. WS Atkins, Inc.operates in a highly regulated industry.We are expected to adhere to numerous,complex legal and regulatory standards. In addition,we must also operate within an ethical framework. If you have an ethical concern, you can look to the Atkins Code of Conduct for guidance.This small but ing powerful resource describes many situations you might encounter in a work environment, as well as appropriate ways you can handle these situations. If you have a question that is not addressed in the Atkins Code of Conduct or in company policy, I ask that you promptly speak with your supervisor, an HR representative,the company's Legal Department—or the Whistleblower Hotline where you can raise an issue anonymously.WS Atkins will not permit retaliation when you raise a concern in good faith. Every day, by acting ethically with our clients,our fellow employees,our shareholders and suppliers,we reaffirm the success of WS Atkins.And now, I invite you to turn the page and take a deeper look at into the Atkins Code of Conduct Very truly yours, /dg‘k4 '-' Kim Weninger Operations Director,WS Atkins, Inc. 5 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA 4FD5 B1C1-B82862A08CDAI 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 19 Introduction Atkins is made up of individuals with Clients.We provide professional a high regard for integrity. We are in services to our clients that help to a rapidly changing and demanding improve their quality of life through business environment. We face sustainable, quality infrastructure complex challenges that place great solutions. To this end,we are pressures on everyone. No matter fully committed to the pursuit of what financial or business goals the continuous quality improvement. We Company sets, our commitment to strive to satisfy client expectations at integrity must come first.As employees all times. We seek to build trust and of the Company,we will operate our to communicate honestly with our business in accordance with the highest clients. We are dedicated to honoring ethical standards and in full compliance our contracts and our commitments. with laws, regulations,and industry best Colleagues. Our success depends on practices.Above all,we pledge honesty the integrity, hard work, and loyalty and integrity in of our business dealings. of our employees. We value our Building for the future: Our employees and treat them with respect values, principles,and standards and dignity. We are fair and courteous (also referred to in this booklet as the in our dealings with one another. As "code" or "code of conduct")is a an organization,we aim to hire the statement of the principles, and key best people.We also strive to create a policies and procedures of Atkins that productive work environment where direct the conduct of our business we constantly encourage one another and our relationships with our key to achieve quality and excellence. stakeholders: our clients, colleagues, We are all responsible for creating a shareholders, and the communities positive, supportive work environment in which we live and work.They all that values diversity and promotes expect us to conduct our business open and honest communication. with integrity. We believe in developing and ' 7 /1 /I , tee,;:.:, 4. a it!' ♦ 1. • kV III ....A. .4 ../ei I 6 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents ili DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-61 C1-682862A08CDA� ,r 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 120 By working for the Company, we are agreeing to act in accordance with the spirit as well as the letter of this code and the Company policies and procedures that apply to your job. maintaining fair and mutually Each of us on the Atkins team— beneficial relationships with our including members of our Board of business partners and suppliers.We Directors,employees of subsidiary are committed to treating our suppliers entities, Company affiliates, and business partners with fairness, consultants,subconsultants,contract dignity,and respect. employees,and others—is responsible Company.As an organization,we for following the standards outlined have a number of responsibilities in the code when conducting business to our shareholders. Each of us is for or on behalf of the Company. By responsible for making proper and working for the Company,we are appropriate use of Company funds agreeing to act in accordance with and assets.We also are responsible for the spirit as well as the letter of this maintaining accurate and complete code and the Company policies and Company records and data and procedures that apply to our jobs. avoiding conflicts of interest. Each of us is responsible for our own Communities.We believe in the conduct. No one has the authority importance of the health and safety to make anyone violate our code. of the public and never sacrificing Any attempt to direct or otherwise quality for profit. Being a citizen of the influence any employee to commit global marketplace also means that a violation is itself a violation of our we are responsible for understanding code. Each of us has a responsibility the needs and challenges of the to properly report any violation or communities in which we live and reasonably suspected violation in work. In addition,we acknowledge accordance with this code.Alleged the responsibilities associated with violations will be investigated and our professions. appropriate action taken. • 7 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents irl DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B1C1-682862A08CDA2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 21 Purpose and use of our code of conduct Integrity test The integrity test can help you nn CO01pli,K9 make good decisions, especially wi,Ek Ek I EE r aid o in situations in which there kav all of s i.rLE of Corv� aK may be no specific policies or EkK dileormola � �oltCi s aKd Eo rvlk standards to guide you. If you apppli.Cabl lavas are unsure about an action or d ds s aid r 9ulaELoKs decision, ask yourself: as w IL as Ek CorvipaK 's values? Naw vac ) ; Would w(AKE I i f w r oK Eo r abouE k r c i vi,K9 Kd m acEi,oK or o s i,E f I ri.9kE: ofEkis aCELoK or d Ci,si,oK oK Ek d Cisi.oK? Would f roKE pa9 of Ek f I f o rl� K wspo p r Er aE d? Because our code and Company policies and procedures cannot address every legal or ethical issue we might face in the course of business, we all must use common sense and good judgment every day. 8 Building for the future Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B1C1-B82862A08CDA1 ,.r 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 22 v-`2 Purpose and use of the code Asking questions and We encourage you to first speak The laws and standards for business raising concerns with your direct supervisor or v manager if you have an ethics or 0 0 conduct are more demanding than The code is designed to serve as a compliance issue. Help or advice is a ever. Meeting those standards is the broad framework of the ethical and also available from: a right thing to do, and also improves legal principles that we are required the Company's performance.The code to abide by when acting on behalf •A senior manager or vice provides an introduction to important of the Company.We can learn more president, or another member laws and policies that everyone in the about these principles by referring to of management if: (1)your Company must follow. The purpose of Company policies and procedures, immediate supervisor is unable to the code is to help each of us: which address specific areas of resolve the issue, or(2)you are • Understand and follow the basic potential concern or risk.These uncomfortable speaking to your policies and procedures are on AXIS. supervisor about the issue. ethics and compliance rules that Because our code and Company A Human Resources apply to our jobs. policies and procedures cannot address • Know when and whom to ask representative; every legal or ethical issue we might • A member of the Legal for advice. face in the course of business,we g must use common sense and good Department; The code addresses general ethics judgment every day. • The Finance and Accounting and compliance concepts and Department; gives employees a broad outline Acting with integrity, honesty, and • Environment, Health, and of acceptable behavior. The policies fairness means speaking up when we: Safety Department; or and procedures that apply to our jobs . Are unsure about theer ro are based on the concepts in the p p Other Company resources. code.The Company's policies and course of action and need advice. procedures are constantly reviewed. • Believe that someone acting on Additionally, if you wish to escalate As they are revised and updated, and behalf of the Company is doing, a concern,we offer these resources: as additional policies and procedures or may be about to do, something • Our Chief Ethics and are implemented, they will be that violates the law or our Compliance Officer located incorporated into the code. standards of conduct. in the Tampa office by phone The code, in addition to the The Company encourages open (813.282.7275)or by email: Company's policies and procedures, discussion of ethics and compliance TPAEthics.na@atkinsglobal.com may be changed from time to time issues by all employees,supervisors, • The Company's Ethics and by the Company.Any changes will and managers. If we have any doubt Compliance Whistleblower be promptly communicated. For about the course to follow, we should Hotline(the Hotline) up-to-date information about changes ask for help and consult Company (800.587.5104), which is to the code, Company policies or resources to determine whether an available to you 24 hours a procedures, and other information action is proper. day, 7 days a week. If you are related to ethics and compliance, look for Ethics and Compliance on Where to go for help unsure about where to find help, uncomfortable about the Company's intranet(AXIS). If you are unsure of how to proceed using resources listed in the in a particular situation, if you have a code, or want to raise an issue business conduct question or concern, anonymously, the Ethics and or if you suspect wrongdoing, it Compliance Hotline is the is crucial to discuss the issue with resource to use. appropriate Company personnel. Resources are available to assist you. 9 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F582607-34AA-4FD5 61 C1-682862A08CDA. 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 23 The Hotline is operated by an Reporting suspected violations allows The Company may report the independent organization.A call the Company to investigate and take misconduct to the appropriate specialist will listen to your concern, prompt remedial action.You can authorities. The Company will make a detailed summary of the call, make reports by telephone,through cooperate with government and forward the information to the email, in person, or by contacting investigations as appropriate. Company's Ethics and Compliance the Ethics and Compliance Hotline. When we are notified of an external Department so that the matter can This policy is not intended to prohibit investigation,we will take prompt be addressed. If you wish to remain you from reporting violations of the action to preserve relevant anonymous,the Hotline will assign code or any laws or regulations to documents and data. a personal reference number so that external authorities. you can check back for a response Non-retaliation policy or provide more information. Giving Our Company is committed to your name, however, can help us look reviewing or investigating—and taking Any employee who in good faith into the matter more thoroughly.As appropriate action regarding— seeks advice, raises a concern,or explained below,the Company has all allegations of violations of its reports misconduct to internal points a firm policy against retaliation for policies and applicable laws.The of contact or external authorities is raising a concern in good faith. review and investigation will be kept doing the right thing.The Company confidential to the extent possible, understands that employees may The address below can be used to regardless of the outcome.We will not be willing to report ethics or mail your concern: take corrective action and make any compliance problems if they feel Ethics and Compliance Office necessary changes. Anyone violating they may be subjected to harassment 4030 W.Boy Scout Blvd.,Ste 700 our standards of conduct will be or retaliation by their supervisor or Tampa,FL 33607 subject to appropriate disciplinary coworkers.Accordingly, the Company action, up to and including will not permit retaliation of any Violations and cooperating termination of employment. kind against good-faith reports or with internal investigations complaints of violations of our code As employees,we have an obligation or other illegal or unethical conduct. If you believe that someone to cooperate fully with internal associated with the Company has investigations.This may include It is important to note that retaliation violated a provision of our code or providing information, documents, and can take many forms,with some any laws or regulations,you have a personal interviews when requested. being more obvious than others.The personal responsibility to bring the Failure to cooperate, including but Company will not demote, terminate, issue in good faith to the attention not limited to, misleading, lying, or otherwise discriminate against of one of the contacts listed above destroying or altering records, or failing employees for raising concerns. and on the previous page. "Good to respond promptly to requests for Additionally, colleagues should not faith" means that you have provided information by investigators is grounds alienate employees who have raised information that you believe to be for disciplinary action, up to and concerns; such employees should be honest and accurate even if you including termination of employment. treated with respect. are later proved to be mistaken. Any person, including supervisors or managers,who is found to have engaged in an act of retaliation against an individual in response to a good-faith report of a violation or 1 .t. suspected violation will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. k w { �,,,. , , Employees who believe they have f`, .. suffered retaliation for raising concerns .i Y 14.,h or asking a question should seek help ' i"'' immediately from one of the resources -at - listed previously. • ,> 4 Note to employees IP This code does not change the terms a. f: and conditions of our employment. Its '4 ` intent is to help each of us understand .11 xXI what is expected of us to be sure that "� we always act ethically and legally when representing the Company. " w Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID 4F562607-34AA-4FD5-B1D1-B82862A08CDAi 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 124 Responsibilities to lilt our clients 2 0 O/ 0 v a v o .4 .\ \\ i \ \ IL Quality performance practices used to strengthen business gift certificates.The potential list is As professionals,we have an relationships,our position is clear: endless,and these are just examples. ethical and legal to We will not solicit,accept or provide (For more information,see Corporate responsibility h public in general perform to gifts,favors,or entertainment if it will Policy#108.0, Business Ethics.) thobligate or appear to obligate the a standard of care consistent with person who receives it.We will never Ordinarily,we are permitted to pay that of the industries we serve and for and accept customary amenities, offer,accept,or provide to anyone the assignments we undertake. such as meals,as long as expenses Moreover,we must achieve our cash or cash equivalents(for example, are reasonable and associated with , bank hecks,traveler's clients'expectations as defined by our gift h checks,certificates money ordersc loans,stock,or a business purpose.A good test as contracts,and we must conform to stock options). to whether a gift or entertainment applicable laws.These requirements should be offered or accepted is to ask define the basic framework of quality We want to avoid even the appearance yourself if public knowledge of the gift performance,which includes quality of misconduct;therefore,we limit or hospitality would be embarrassing control,quality assurance,and the types of gifts and entertainment or would jeopardize important continuous quality improvement.(See (sometimes referred to as "business relationships with clients,employees, Corporate Policy#400.0,Quality.) courtesies")that we may offer or suppliers,or the general public. Quality performance is the backbone give to,or solicit or accept from, of the Company's Corporate Quality firms,agencies,and persons with Giving gifts and entertainment Initiative and is an expectation of the whom we do business. "Gifts The Company is committed to Company's employees. and entertainment" or"business effectively marketing its products courtesies" means anything of and services based on quality, price, Gifts and entertainment value, including but not limited to service,and reputation for integrity in We win projects or assignments based gifts,services, meals,entertainment, conducting its business.The Company's on the merits of our people,expertise, hospitality,transportation,use of funds or assets must not be used and services.While reasonable gifts vacation facilities, home improvements, for gifts to,or entertainment of, and entertainment are common membership fees or dues,tickets,and 11 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents fi DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA 4FD5-B1CI-B82862Ao8CDA1.4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 25 clients, suppliers, and subcontractors likely to be voided, and the Company The Company supports these rules, unless the following criteria are met: is likely not to be paid for goods or and employees are expected to comply • The business courtesy is not services provided.The Company with both the spirit and the letter of to influence or obligate recipient offerededt expressly prohibits phepexpenditure of any laws or regulations. Even though toiflenceto general theor recipc anyfunds for anypurpose that maygovernment employees are responsible with respect or as a quid pro quo(that constitute a violation of the law or for tracking and monitoring restrictions action,, offered for something regulation of any jurisdiction in which that apply to them, no employee of isin return somethingfor the businessyedcourtesy). the Company operates. the Company shall knowingly violate any applicable rules. If you are unsure • The business courtesy does not Gifts and entertainment for about what is or is not appropriate, violate any laws, regulations, or government officials and employees you must seek guidance from the standards of conduct of either What may be customary when Legal Department. our Company or the recipient's conducting nongovernmental, To avoid any appearance of impropriety, organization. It is our responsibility commercial business often may not and to avoid any questions as to to inquire about prohibitions be acceptable in doing business with or limitations of the recipient's government officials or employees and conduct underlaws and regulations, organization before offering any may be prohibited by the particularly the Compannyyhas adopted a policy cy business courtesy. Further, Company restrictive and complex rules and of entertainment andthhe givingon of employees have the dutyto the giving of gifts, practices that govern the acceptance gratuities, and favors to federal, state, inquire and seek the advice of the of meals, entertainment, gifts, or other and local government employees, Company's Legal Department in business courtesies. In fact, certain order to fullyunderstand anylocal agents, or officials. However, there commercial business practices, if may be some instances when the laws and regulations governing the applied in a government setting, Company may choose to provide a giving of gifts and/or entertainment. can lead to administrative or civil gift or entertainment to a government • The business courtesy is consistent penalties, or even criminal sanctions, official as a common business courtesy. with accepted business practices both for individual employees and In such cases,a gift may be given and does not exceed the norm for the Company. or entertainment may be provided in the context of the person Special laws apply to U.S. federal only if the criteria listed on this page giving or receiving the courtesy, government employees, including are met. is infrequent in nature, and is not members of Congress and their staffs. lavish or extravagant. Gifts and entertainment for foreign • In general, government personnel are government officials and employees Gifts and entertainment must be prohibited from accepting, and we are of foreign governments properly recorded in accordance prohibited from offering, any items with Company policy. having more than minimal monetary The general guidance regarding value.The prohibition includes meals, gifts and payments to government Some jurisdictions outside of the transportation, lodging, services, officials set forth previously applies United States more strictly regulate the conference fees, vendor promotional to both domestic and foreign giving of gifts to private individuals, training, and discounts not available to government officials. Company including clients and suppliers. In the general public. Similar restrictions employees must understand that other jurisdictions and under certain may apply to state and local officials additional restrictions on the provision circumstances in the U.S. as well, gift and employees, and to officials and of gifts or payments to foreign giving between private parties for a employees in other countries,who government officials are imposed corrupt purpose is unlawful. Contracts are directly or indirectly involved in by both U.S. and foreign laws. awarded under such circumstances are government procurements. The Company is committed to effectively marketing its products and services based on quality, price, service, and reputation for integrity in conducting its business. 12 Building for the future.Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents II DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA 4FD5-B1C1-B82862AOSCDA1.1 ..c 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 126 It is a violation of U.S. federal law Over the years, many non-cash While the FCPA permits small to corruptly influence or attempt to items have been the basis of federal facilitation payments, the UK Bribery influence foreign public officials in prosecutions, including travel Act 2010 does not.All facilitation order to improperly obtain or retain expenses, golf outings,automobiles, payments MUST be reviewed and any business advantage. Employees and loans with favorable interest approved in advance by the General should be particularly mindful of rates or repayment terms. If you Counsel/Chief Compliance Officer. the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act have questions about what may of 1977(FCPA)as amended by be permissible, contact the Receiving gifts and entertainment the International Anti-Bribery and Legal Department. Please note:Although the receipt Fair Competition Act of 1998. It is of gifts and entertainment may a violation both of this law and of Many foreign countries have be more common in the context an implemented their own laws Company y policy for an employee or that criminalize bribery of foreign of supplier relationships,these an agent of the Company directly or public officials in connection with guidelines are included here for indirectly, including by or through an international business no matter where reference and convenience. agent or representative or any other in the world the act of bribery occurs. Just as we have strict rules regarding person, to: In some cases, the laws of these the offering or providing of gifts • Give,offer, or promise anything of countries are stricter than U.S. laws, and entertainment,we must o value to a foreign public official, in that they have made it a criminal also be careful how we receive ;, government employee, politician,or offense for any of their citizens or them. Suppliers are vital to our candidate for public office, including employees of their companies to bribe, Company's success,which is why 2 a public international organization offer to bribe,or attempt to bribe any our relationships with them must a or political party,with the intent to person anywhere. Under the laws of be based entirely on sound business g o influence such official, politician, these countries, it is a crime to bribe decisions and fair dealing. Business political party,or employee in his or not only public government officials gifts and entertainment can build her official capacity, or; but also private-sector individuals. All goodwill, but they can also make • Induce such official, politician, employees should ensure that they it harder to be objective about the political party,or employee to comply with applicable criminal laws, person providing them. use his or her influence with his in every jurisdiction. No employee,or any person with or her government to assist the On July 1, 2011, the UK Bribery Act whom the employee has a close Company in obtaining or retaining 2010 took effect.This Act,while personal relationship*, shall solicit business,or; similar to the FCPA, is designed to cash, loans, or cash equivalents • Secure any improper advantage. tighten the UK's regulatory framework. of any amount, or any gifts or Payments need not be in cash to Any company with a UK office, with entertainment, or any other be illegal. employees who are UK citizens, preferential treatment from any of or providing any services to a UK the Company's actual or potential organization is covered by the Act. subcontractors, suppliers,or clients. QOur client has asked us to set up a working lunch for a group that will include both federal and state employees. The state employees are allowed to accept a reasonable lunch and will expect lunch to be provided. What should we do? AProvide a modest lunch (for example, sandwiches and chips), typically less than $20 per person, depending on the jurisdiction. For audit purposes, maintain in the files documentation of the meeting attendees and the cost of lunch. Federal employees will be required to pay for their own lunches; therefore, document actual costs and indicate that the federal employees paid for their individual lunches. Provide a basket, along with a suggested contribution *Persons in a"close personal amount, for federal employees to deposit their lunch payments. relationship"to you can include the following_spouse,same or opposite sex domestic partner,parents, stepparents,children,stepchildren, siblings,stepsiblings,nephews, nieces,aunts,uncles,grandparents, grandchildren,in-laws,and any person in your household 13 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents C, DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B1 C1-B82862AOSCDAI ..t 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 27 What are legitimate methods of gathering competitive information? AWe recognize that it is necessary and legal to gather competitive information fairly and honestly. Legitimate sources of competitive information can include newspapers, press accounts, information on the Internet or at trade shows, other public information, and conversations with clients who are not competitors and who are not discussing confidential or competitive information. • We as employees may accept • The offering of gifts, entertainment, Time sheets and expense reports common courtesies usually or other preferential treatment that Time sheets must be completed associated with accepted business materially exceeds nominal value truthfully and accurately.We must practices, provided: to an employee or any person with ensure that hours worked and costs -It is lawful to do so. whom the employee has a close are applied to the account for which personal relationship should be they were incurred. We must never -The acceptance is not for the promptly reported in writing by the submit, or direct or pressure any purpose of influencing a decision employee to his or her supervisor employee to submit,time charges or securing favorable treatment. and to the Chief Ethics and that do not accurately reflect actual -The acceptance will build Compliance Officer. Each employee time worked on a particular contract goodwill and encourage successful is personally responsible for orroect. ensuringthat his or her acceptance p business relations. p of such meals, refreshments, or In addition,our work as a government -The courtesies are not entertainment is proper and could contractor has special recordkeeping lavish or extravagant under not reasonably be construed in requirements. Our time records and the circumstances. any way as an attempt to secure expense reports, as well as other -The courtesies are not part of a favorable treatment. information we prepare, may be of frequent acceptance provided directly to the government patternHonesty in communications or may form the basis for a of personf coucourte sies firm.from the same and contracting representation or claim the Company oWe are committed to conducting our makes to the government. For more -The employee accepting the business fairly and honestly. We must: information, refer to Corporate Policy courtesies would feel comfortable 650.0,Timekeeping and Corporate knowing that his or her managers • Be honest, accurate, and truthful Policy 403.0, Expense Reports. and coworkers, as well as the in all statements, communications, public, know about the courtesies. and representations and properly Gathering competitive • Gifts in the form of cash, loans, manage our business and information contractual relations stocks, bonds, or similar types . To compete effectively in the of cash equivalents must not be • Exercise care to prevent any marketplace, it is necessary and accepted, regardless of amount. material or nonapproved changes legal to fairly and honestly gather or • It is that in from our contract obligations and receive government or competitive countries,s recognized due tot culturaltin certain customs, scope of work. information.We must compete refusal of personal gifts with a value • Ensure that services provided sfairly and honestly,raeceive, possess,wwill not materially in excess of nominal by the Company meet our usecit,informgatheation bucompetitors or value could result in embarrassing contract requirements. use information about or government information that we business situations or unintentional insult. The propriety of employees keeping such gifts for personal use should be discussed with the Company's Legal Department in each case promptly upon receipt. No gift, favor, or entertainment should be solicited, accepted, or provided if it will obligate or appear to obligate the person who receives it. 14 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA 4FD5 B1 C1-B82862A08CDAi .4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 28 We are committed to avoiding even the appearance of improper solicitation, possession, receipt, use, or transmittal of government or competitive information. should not have or that we have • Confidential or proprietary If you have reason to believe that gathered or received by inappropriate information gained through a bribe or kickback has been given means. Additionally,we will not association with another firm in or accepted, report it immediately give such information to others. a joint venture in which the joint to the Legal Department or Chief Solicitation, receipt, possession, venture agreement provides for Ethics and Compliance Officer. knowledge of, use, or transmittal of protection of this information. Government audits and certain government or competitive • Confidential or proprietary investigations information is a violation of the information in any form law, and some forms of information possessed by new hires from Our business is highly regulated, gathering can violate the law as well previous employers. and occasionally our personnel as our own Company standards. may come into contact with We are committed to avoiding If you are uncertain as to whether a government officials responsible even the appearance of improper solicitation, receipt, possession, use, for conducting audits or enforcing solicitation, possession, receipt, or release of nonpublic information is the law. For example,the U.S. use, or transmittal of government unauthorized, do not distribute or use government has the right to or competitive information.We will it until the question has been reviewed examine selected Company books, not solicit, receive, possess, use, and resolved by the Legal Department. records, and data. State and local or transmit: agencies may also have similar Anti-kickback and rights. It is the Company's policy • Any confidential or proprietary bribery policy to cooperate with government information belonging to someone We believe in safeguarding the investigations as appropriate. We else to which the Company is not will deal honestly with government integrity of the procurement process legitimately entitled from a client, for our clients. Therefore,we will officials and coordinate all requests competitor, or any other source. for information through the Legal not offer, solicit, give, or accept • In a federal or other government anything of value as a basis for giving, Department. Any information procurement, Source Selection obtaining, or retaining contracts or provided must be accurate, honest, Information(SSI)that is not publicly favorable treatment under contracts. and truthful. available,whether marked SSI or not. Such information includes competitor bid prices or proposed costs or prices; source selection or technical evaluation plans; While attending a conference, I overheard one of technical, cost, or price evaluations our competitors describe a new construction process of competitors' proposals; rankings theywill use for an upcoming project. Since they bids, proposals, or competitive range determinations; reports of will bid against us on the project, should I give this source selection panels, boards, or information to anyone? councils; or any other information marked as SSI. Under some circumstances, the Company could legally use this information. However, the rules regarding proper use are complex. Therefore, before using or disclosing the information to anyone within the Company, you should consult the Legal Department or Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer. 15 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents 41) DocuSign Envelope ID.4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B1C1-B82862A08CDAg 54 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services ! 29 QWe have just been notified that the U.S.government will be conducting an audit at our location. What should we do? AWe have adopted procedures for responding to federal, state, and local government inquiries or investigations into our business activities. First, contact the Legal Department immediately when you become aware of an inquiry, request for information, or investigation by any government entity. Second, be sure that records relevant to the inquiry are preserved. Third, when requested to furnish financial data to government auditors, responses are to be approved and provided by our President and Chief Financial Officer. Release of any other records and data requested by any government agency will be approved as appropriate by the Legal Department. Hiring government employees trade,or keep competitors out of the We want to safeguard the integrity marketplace. In addition,we will not: of the contracting process by never • Communicate with competitors causing or contributing to even the about controlling prices, appearance of favoritism in connection allocating markets, boycotting - with the hiring of current or former clients or suppliers,or limiting government employees. the sale of services. 1104 ..4 Strict rules may govern the hire, • Make false statements about attempt to hire,or discussion of our competitors. >� hiring certain employees of many . Improperly receive or use government agencies. Before discussing employment with any our competitors'proprietary current or former government information,including pricing employee,we must consult and information. receive prior written approval from Organizational conflicts the Legal Department and applicable of interest Business Unit Director. If a current or former government employee initiates The Company complies with laws any employment discussions,we must and regulations prohibiting immediately contact and obtain advice organizational conflicts of interest. from the Legal Department. We must take appropriate steps to recognize and avoid organizational Fair competition conflicts of interest in which the We believe our clients and society activities of one service or division of at large benefit from fair,free,and the Company may preclude another open markets.Therefore,we will service or division of the Company not engage in any practices that from pursuing a related opportunity. would "fix" prices, unfairly restrain If an organizational conflict of interest exists,we must disclose and mitigate such conflicts in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Strict rules may govern the hire, attempt to hire, or discussion of hiring certain employees of many government agencies. 16 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents Q DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B1C1-B82862AOSCDA, ..t 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 30 Responsibilities to our _, fellow employees Safety, health &environment The Company strives to provide its employees with a clean,safe, and healthy place to work. Each of i. us is responsible for,and shares in the benefits of,a safe and healthy �''•� work environment. Employees must understand the shared irOV jdr ' responsibilities of abiding by safety rules and practices,taking the necessary precautions to protect ."•, ft, ` :>„..A.IS,.`..t ourselves and coworkers,and reporting immediately any unsafe ` -llreip--ert-.4. 7 -' conditions, practices,or accidents. o 0 Our Safety, Health&Environment - il E Department maintains a compre- a 1 3 hensive site on AXIS which IIII: . details the elements of the Program, a` including our Safety, Health& c, Environment policies, procedures, and safety planning tools. Suspected drug or alcohol abuse, prohibited.This policy relates to all If you questions or want to should be reported to your supervisor, phases of employment, including If report an have questions onor unsafe a Human Resources representative, recruitment,hiring, placement, condition,unhealthy or ucnsafe your or our Chief Ethics and Compliance promotion,transfer,compensation, supervisor,odoimmediatelythe o Officer,or call the Ethics and benefits,training, educational, social, Health& eCompany's SSafety,tor or Compliance Hotline. For more and recreational programs,as well other Company Environment resources.To report information,refer to Corporate as the use of Company facilities. Our on accident, contact youre Policy 310.0,Substance Abuse; officers, managers, and supervisors at aand Safety,Hotline and also F+G Policy 21, Substance all levels are responsible for ensuring Health 8772022794.andEnvironment Abuse&Testing Policy. that the spirit and intent of this policy aare consistently practiced. Diversity and fair treatment Drugs and alcohol If you have questions on equal Company expects We support diversity in our workplace employment equity,or if you have The Company work able employeesto and among our clients and suppliers. observed or experienced any form of treport ti to and from performthWe have established a Corporate discrimination,contact the Company's their duties, s,and freeillegal drugs,controlled Diversity Advisory Council to help Equal Employment Opportunity influenceof of or strengthen our corporate commitment Officer in Human Resources or the substances,abuse prescribed alcohol.rto developing best practices in Legal Department.Also refer to The over-the-counterinterests our drugs,orts and other recruiting, retaining,and advancing Corporate Policy 225.0, Discrimination/ employees demand fulle attentiondandepeople of diverse backgrounds. Harassment/Retaliation. concentration. Reporting to work Discrimination against any employee Workplace harassment under the influence of any illegal or prospective employee,or the P drug orf e using making of disparaging comments or We are expected to conduct ourselves medication;oalcohol; improperlypr possysusinsing, criticisms,on the basis of race,color, in a manner appropriate to the religion,gender, national origin, workplace,to keepwork environments buying,or selling illegal drugs or p aamedical tillon or tlfree oothers controlled substances while ohe job al orientation,veteran status,or wthre respect and fairness.Workplaceon Company property the any other protected group is strictly harassment can be verbal, physical, and may result in immediate discharge. 17 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents ii DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA-4FD5 61C1-682862A08CDA1.1.4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 131 or visual,where the purpose ori effect is to create an offensive, E ` ` i ,��► hostile, or intimidating environment. ;{ - "**7.4 Sexual * ,- Sexual harassment, in particular, can include sexual advances, requests - • for sexual favors, unwanted physical t contact, or repeated and unwelcome sexual suggestions. Examples of other prohibited conduct include '• offensive racial, ethnic, religious, "' age-related, or sexual jokes or insults; • 7:1111111P; ° distributing or displaying offensive pictures or cartoons;and using , ). voicemail,email,or other electronic devices to transmit derogatory or • . It discriminatory information. If we observe or experience any form of harassment,we must report it immediately so that the Company can properly address it. Such reports What types of incidents must I report? may be made to a Human Resources representative, to the Company Atkins requires that any workplace injury, vehicle accident, Legal Department, or via the Hotline. property damage event, or environmental release be reported For more information, refer to Corporate Policy 225.0, Discrimination/ to your supervisor and the Safety, Health & Environment Harassment/Retaliation, and Corporate Department as soon as possible. All injuries and vehicle Policy 108.0, Business Ethics. accidents must be reported the same day they occur. In Employee privacy addition, any unplanned event in which any of the above We respect every employee's right to could have occurred, termed a Near Miss, must also be confidentiality of certain employment reported within 24 hours of the incident. records, including certain health information, as well as the privacy of All reporting to Safety, Health & Environment can be made personal activities outside of business via the Incident Reporting Hotline—877.202.2794. hours. Employees who are responsible These processes are summarized on our Incident Reporting for maintaining personal information, Wallet Card, which you are urged to print out and keep on and those who are provided access to such information, must not disclose your person at all times as a quick-reference guide. it inappropriately. While we respect an employee's right to privacy,we must also recognize I would like to ask a colleague out on a date. that there are situations where it may Is this acceptable? be necessary for the Company to access employee communications. It is acceptable if the colleague is not in a direct or indirect Our Company retains rights of access reporting relationship to you. You must use good judgment to all Company property, including computers and all communications, to ensure that if the offer is unwelcome, you do not pursue it email and voicemail messages, records, further or create a hostile or intimidating environment. and information created in the business setting, regardless of whether the individual considers the information or communication to be private. For additional information, see While we respect an employee's right to privacy, Use of the Company's Information we must also recognize that there are situations where Systems on the following page. it may be necessary for the Company to access employee communications 18 Building for the future Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B1C1-B82862AO8CDAix,.t 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 32 Responsibilities to I. our shareholders Use of company resources officers,and directors must maintain The ease with which we can share and assets the privacy of confidential information knowledge has many benefits, but it Our Company belong to entrusted to us by the Company or also creates risks for our company. our Company resources,anwe must tobe its subcontractors,clients,or joint We need to observe the rules responsible for their use. Company venture or other business partners, governing information sharing to resources include, but are not and may not disclose it unless written protect ourselves and Atkins from to,ouudfacilities, computers, authorization to do so is provided by copyright infringement. limited inventory, trade secrets, office supplies, a Company official with appropriate Atkins maintains an annual business y pp authority. Confidential information equipment,vehicles, products, copyright subscription through includes nonpublic information that confidential information, and funds. might be of use to our competitors the Copyright Clearance Center Additionally, our reputation and or harmful to the Company or our (CCC). This license enables company identity are among the Company's clients if disclosed. Keep documents employees to reuse and distribute most valuable assets.All employees lawfully obtained excerpts from are responsible for using good that contain confidential information copyright protected titles identified judgment to ensure that these protected and secure. from CCC's extensive catalog of resources are not misused or wasted. Copyright authorized works, in both print and Theft, carelessness, and waste have a digital formats, representing more direct impact on our profitability and, Copyright is defined by the U.S. than 10,000 registered publishers. ultimately,on our jobs. Also, misuse Copyright Office as "a form of or misappropriation of Company protection grounded in the U.S. We must always check first before assets may be considered criminal Constitution and granted by law for sharing or distributing copyrighted and can bring severe consequences. original works of authorship fixed in material. We can verify that a a tangible medium of expression." publication is covered under the o ., Protection of Company and other Copyright covers both published and copyright license by visiting the232 confidential information unpublished works. It includes literary, CCC copyright license at a Information is an important asset, and dramatic, musical, and artistic works, http://www.copyright.com. we each share a special responsibility such as poetry, novels, movies,songs, Select Verify Coverage and search o. tto protect our Company's confidential computer software, and architecture for the publication under the ce o information and the confidential to name a few. annual business license. information of others.All employees, I want to email an article from a professional journal to the members of my team before our next meeting. Is this okay? AThis is copyrighted material. You must first check to see if it is covered under our annual business license. If it is, you can print or email copies for your meeting. If not, you must obtain permission, and often pay a fee, for the right to use the material. 19 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA 4FD5 B1 C1-B82862A08CDAI .4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 33 QCan my manager access my email without informing me? AOur Company reserves the right to monitor email and other information systems as necessary; however, managers must have a valid reason to access an employee's email account and must obtain prior approval from the Legal Department and Human Resources. obligations. Excessive personal use of the systems is not acceptable. 'a.,r........M Communications that you have at work(including email, voicemail, network, and Internet access)are not necessarily private,and confidentiality cannot be assured. Our Company - ' reserves the right to monitor or make records of all such communications to verify that Company policies are being followed or for other reasons. The Company also reserves the right to disclose specific use of these systems to others. ' For more information, refer to Corporate Policy 501.0, Information Technology Security, and Corporate Policy 305.0, Personal Telephone Calls and Mail Facility. Use of information systems • Installing hardware or software Accuracy of books and records Information systems(hardware, by anyone other than appropriate All Company business information, software, and data that are stored, Information Technology personnel. documents, and electronic data, processed, and reported)are critical • Conducting for-profit, including internal or external to our business success. Examples non-Company business. correspondence, memoranda, or include desktop or laptop computers, communications of any type, must be telephones,file servers and networks, We are also expected to protect the prepared as completely, honestly, and email messages, and documents. security and confidentiality of our accurately as is reasonably possible and Everyone who uses our information information systems. in accordance with generally accepted systems is responsible for ensuringthat accounting principles and practices. y ph We must: Company business documents must be these resources operate as they should. p Y This means we must use these systems • Protect information used to access preserved and retained in accordance responsibly and primarily for legitimate Company information systems, with Company policy. Refer to business purposes. Company policy including user IDs, passwords, and Corporate Policy 226.0, Records prohibits the use of our information building-access key cards. Retention and Disposal. systems for: • Protect the confidentiality and Accounting and reporting • Engaging in communications security of our information systems, that might be considered illegal, especially our data. We make decisions based on information recorded at every level offensive, defamatory, harassing, • Protect information systems from of the Company. Inaccurate records obscene,vulgar, or otherwise damage, including physical damage lead to poor decisions and negative disruptive to normal business activity. and virus-caused damage. business consequences. Additionally, • Visiting inappropriate Internet sites. You mayuse the email, network, and our recordkeeping procedures are essential to ensure that costs are • Improperly disseminating Internet systems for incidental personal properly charged.All transactions copyrighted or licensed use, provided such use does not between the Company and outside materials or confidential and interfere with the Company's business individuals and organizations must be proprietary information. operations or your employment 20 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents Q DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA-4FD5 61C1-682862A08CDAl .4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 34 Theft, carelessness, and waste have a direct impact on our profitability and, ultimately, on all of our jobs. promptly and accurately entered in Outside employment with a We can never invest in a supplier our books in accordance with generally supplier or client.We may not be if we have any involvement in accepted accounting practices employed by, serve as a director of, the selection or assessment of, and principles. No undisclosed or or perform services for or represent or negotiations with,the supplier, unrecorded fund may be established in any way a supplier or client of or if we supervise anyone who for any purpose. the Company. (This includes any has such responsibility. Also,we We are expected to report to the person or organization that is seeking can never invest in a client if we Company when we reasonably to become a supplier or client.) are responsible for dealing with believe that any person has engaged Financial interests in other that client or supervise anyone in questionable accounting, businesses.We may not own, directly with such responsibility. management,or auditing practices. or indirectly, an interest in any business Corporate opportunities. We can contact the Finance and that does or seeks to do business with When the opportunity arises, Accounting Department, Legal the Company,or seeks to compete we owe a duty to the Company Department,or Chief Ethics and with the Company. However, it is to advance its legitimate interests. Compliance Officer with accounting usually not considered a conflict We may not take personally for or auditing concerns. Remember, of interest to make investments ourselves opportunities that are we have the option of voicing of no more than 1 percent of the discovered through the use of concerns anonymously, by calling outstanding securities of a public Company property, information, the Whistleblower Hotline. company, no more than $25,000 of a or position, or use Company privately owned company, or no more property, information, or position Conflicts of interest than 5 percent of your and/or your for personal gain. family members'total assets. A conflict of interest occurs when ° r. our private interest interferes,or even appears to interfere,with the interests of the Company as a whole. o r A conflict situation can arise when a"g we take actions or have interests that re ° may make it difficult for us to make I am planning an office event where wine and beer objective and fair decisions when will be served. Do I need to split out the alcohol costs performing our jobs. Conflicts of separately when I report the expenses? interest between personal and official responsibilities may arise in a variety of Yes. Because we do business with government entities, ways. Although we cannot list every we must make provisions for certain costs that cannot possible conflict of interest, below are some common examples that illustrate be charged to the government; for example, alcoholic actual, apparent, or potential conflicts beverages. These costs require special accounting of interest. treatment. Other examples include entertaining clients and Outside employment with a potential clients (such as tickets to sporting events, theater competitor.We may not compete tickets, golf tournaments), general advertising, first-class with the Company or consult with, airfare, and flowers or birthday cakes for employees. Please be employed in any capacity by, or note that government accounting rules are complex and perform services for or represent require careful attention. Questions should be directed to in any way a competitor of our Company. (This includes any person or the Finance and Accounting Department. organization that is seeking to become a competitor.) 21 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents 41 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDAi ..r 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 135 Many conflicts of interest can be resolved in a mutually acceptable way, but they must be addressed. Certain relationships.We may find Loans and guarantees. It is In addition,while the Company does ourselves in a situation where we have unlawful for the Company to extend not specifically prohibit employees a close relationship with a supplier, or maintain credit, arrange for the from engaging in outside business client, competitor,or employee of extension of credit,or renew an activities,employees and managers the Company. Such situations are not extension of credit in the form of a are expected to disclose to their necessarily prohibited, but we are personal loan to or for any director or supervisor and to the Chief Ethics required to disclose the situation to executive officer. and Compliance Officer, in a timely our supervisors and to the Chief Ethics Perhaps the most important word to manner, any actual or potential outside and Compliance Officer. In general, remember when it comes to conflicts employment,consulting, or other anyone with whom we have a close of interest and outside business business activities with any external relationship should not have any activities is "disclose". Disclosures business. Refer to Corporate Policy business dealings with us,with anyone must be timely.We have the obligation 108.0, Business Ethics. working in our business unit,or with to be transparent in our dealings on Records retention related to anyone who reports to us. In addition, behalf of the Company. we should never be in a situation litigation or investigations where we have the ability to hire, If we are ever in a situation in which If we learn of a subpoena,a supervise, affect terms and conditions someone might question our loyalty to pending or contemplated lawsuit, of employment, or influence the the Company,we must disclose it. or a government investigation, we management of anyone with whom It is our responsibility to voluntarily must immediately contact the Legal we have a close relationship, regardless report a conflict of interest without Department. We will retain and of whether that person is a Company the need for specific inquiry by the preserve all records that may pertain employee. We must also be careful Company.We may not engage in to or be relevant to the subpoena, the not to disclose confidential business any conduct involving a possible or litigation,or the investigation until information to anyone with whom apparent conflict of interest unless informed by our Legal Department we have a close relationship. Persons we receive prior written permission as to how to proceed. In addition, in a close relationship to us can from the Legal Department. Many once we have learned of a subpoena, include the following: spouse, same conflicts of interest can be resolved in lawsuit,or government investigation, or opposite sex domestic partner, a mutually acceptable way, but they we must take steps to preserve parents, stepparents, children, must be addressed. Failure to from destruction all relevant records stepchildren, siblings, stepsiblings, disclose a conflict may lead to that,without intervention,would nephews, nieces,aunts, uncles, disciplinary action. automatically be destroyed or erased grandparents, grandchildren, in-laws, (such as email or voicemail messages). and any person in our household. Destruction of such records, even if inadvertent, could seriously harm our Company. If we have questions regarding whether a particular record I am thinking of accepting a part-time job. pertains to a potential investigation, Do I need to disclose this? subpoena,or lawsuit, or how to preserve particular types of records, we must preserve the records AIf you think you may have a conflict of interest or an in question and ask the Legal appearance of a conflict of interest, or that others could Department for guidance. possibly believe an activity or relationship you are engaged For detailed instructions on records in is a conflict of interest, you must contact the Chief retention, refer to Corporate Policy Ethics and Compliance Officer or the Legal Department 226.0, Records Retention and Disposal. for appropriate review and resolution. 22 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA 4FD5 61 C1-682862AOSCDAI 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 36 International trade As responsible corporate citizens,we must comply with the laws concerning international trade. It is Company - policy to comply with applicable customs, anti-boycott, embargo, export, and trade control laws, rules, and regulations.The Company regularly verifies that its clients, potential clients, and business partners are not subject to a U.S. embargo, sanction, or transaction control. In international dealings,we must know and comply with export controls,trade -N restrictions, and other laws pertaining .lk- ' ., , :. .? .., , , , .. to conducting business internationally. . . . In some circumstances, a license may ,i .. .: be required for certain disclosures or ' •: . activities that take place in the U.S. If we are involved in international business,we must contact the without further modification. Items Only these spokespersons are Legal Department to make sure we requiring export licenses appear on the authorized to release information understand the standards applicable Commerce Control List in the Export to the public at appropriate to our business activities.Applicable Administration Regulations. times. Unless you have been .fur international trade regulations include: designated as a spokesperson, do International traffic in arms For more information, please see not respond to inquiries from the ° Anti-Boycott Policy 121.0 and p q o regulations, a U.S. law administered Anti Bribery Policy 122.0. press. In addition, our contractual by the U.S. Department of State that agreements often require that regulates the international transfers Anti-money laundering we obtain authorization from of certain military equipment or our clients prior to the release technology and may require prior Anti money laundering laws prohibit of certain information. All reporting, approval, and licensing by engaging in transactions when it is inquiries from the media should the Department of State. known that the funds involved were be forwarded immediately to the derived from illegal activities.We Company's Senior Vice President Export administration regulations, comply with applicable anti-money of Marketing &Communications, a federal law administered by the laundering laws, rules, and regulations the Company's President,or other U.S. Department of Commerce that of the U.S. and other countries having designated spokesperson. regulates exports of commercial and comparable laws. dual-use commodities and technology and may require prior Department Communications with media of Commerce reporting,approval, We want to provide open, accurate, and licensing. Dual-use items are and consistent communications to the products, software, and technical data public. To maintain the consistency developed for civil applications that and accuracy of this information, can also be used for military purposes corporate spokespersons are designated to respond to all inquiries. 23 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID.4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDAi .4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 37 Responsibilities to our suppliers and business partners We are committed to managing our Through my local Chamber of Commerce, I often subcontractor, subconsultant, and learn of new businesses in my town. Knowing how supplier relationships in a fair and difficult it is to start a business, I would like to consider reasonable manner, consistent with applicable laws and good business them as suppliers for our projects when appropriate. practices.When we select suppliers Is this a good idea? for professional services and make other purchasing decisions, these decisions must be based on sound It is important to select a supplier who has the qualifications business practices and fairness.We and experience to successfully carry out the terms of the promote quality based selection for agreement with Atkins. While supporting a new business is professional services to the maximum admirable, you must be confident that the new supplier will extent practicable. We will select pp subcontractors, suppliers, and vendors be able to follow through. The outcome of your project and on the basis of merit by comparing the reputation of Atkins can be affected, either positively or and evaluating price, quality, technical negatively, by the choice of suppliers. Performing thorough excellence, performance, and their due diligence is critical when selecting subcontractors, reputations for conducting business with honesty and integrity.We will subconsultants, and suppliers. base our purchasing decisions on suppliers'abilities to meet our needs and not on personal relationships and friendships. We will use the highest ethical 010000 standards in business practices, source selection, negotiation, determination of contract awards, and the administration of purchasing activities.We will not encourage a vendor or subcontractor to grant, and o we will not knowingly accept,any unlawful discount or price that does v not represent a fair market value or .c goods or services of similar quality a and quantity. Refer to Receiving Gifts and Entertainment on page 13,which is generally applicable in the context of relationships with suppliers and other business partners. We will base our purchasing decisions on suppliers' abilities to meet our needs and not on personal relationships and friendships. 24 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA-4FD5-61C1-B82862A08CDAl .4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 38 Responsibilities to our communities where we live and work Compliance with laws , and regulations ., ,`''.° .... We want to be a good corporate ,' citizen wherever we operate by + complying with applicable laws and ,,, regulations. Our business is highly regulated, and it is the responsibility of i, each of us to know and comply with � �. the laws and regulations applicable 4. to our iob responsibilities. If you need ii,;1 more information about the legal ✓ requirements of your job,contact your manager or the Legal Department. , Upholding professional standards , Many of us have a responsibility to be aware of and adhere to applicable professional standards of conduct, ranging from engineering to accounting to law.As an industry leader,we have responsibilities to help (See F+G Policy 7,Worldwide respective jurisdictions, and similar shape and guide our professions by: Environmental &Sustainability Policy.) laws exist in other countries. • Sharing knowledge and information Community activities Accordingly, while we are within our professional networks. encouraged to be actively involved We as employees are encouraged to in the political process,such activity • Actively supporting our professional participate in community organizations must be done on our own time,at associations and seeking leadership and activities; however,we should be our own expense,and with our own roles where appropriate. alert to conflicts of interest if holding facilities and equipment. Subject to • Seeking opportunities to encourage public office or serving on commissions certain limited exceptions permitted students to enter our professions or advisory groups. by law and authorized in advance and mentor them through the Political activities and and in writing by both the Chief educational process. contributions Executive Officer and Corporate Legal Counsel,we may not: Respecting the environment The Company strongly believes in • It is our policy to manage our business the importance of participating in civic expenditure corporate contribution or in an environmentally responsible affairs and the political process.We nyein tcenor localon with manner and to comply with federal, encourage our employees to exercise any federal, state, or local election, state, and local laws and regulations our right to vote and to support or in connection with any political a, relating to the protection of the candidates and parties of their choice. party or activity or any political action committee(PAC). :FE environment. Company offices and However; in the U.S.,federal law E facilities must implement processes prohibits corporations and government • Ask for or receive, directly or ° designed to comply with applicable contractors such as the Company from indirectly, reimbursement for c, o environmental laws. All facilities using Company facilities or assets any individual contribution or must have the necessary permits and to influence any federal election. expenditure with respect to any submit appropriate documentation to Local and state laws also govern federal, state, or local election or governmental agencies in an accurate political contributions, expenditures, other political activity or any PAC. and timely manner. and activities as they apply in their 25 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents Gil DocuSign Envelope ID 4F562607-34AA-4FD5 B1C1-682862AO8CDAr 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 39 • Use or permit another to use The Company has established and Lobbying Company facilities(for example, administers a PAC that may solicit It is the Company's policy to comply offices, meeting rooms,telephones, and accept contributions from with applicable laws and regulations stationery,email access,computers, certain employees and then use relating to lobbying and activities or faxes)in connection with any those funds to make contributions that support lobbying. Lobbying federal,state,or local election,or in and expenditures in connection with and lobbying activities at the federal connection with any political party federal,state,and local elections,as level are governed by the Lobbying or activity or PAC. permitted by law. Contributions to the Disclosure Act of 1995,as amended, • Engage in or ask another to Company PAC by eligible employees which requires,among other things, engage in any political activity, are entirely voluntary;those who do registration and regular filings with including soliciting contributions, not contribute will suffer no adverse the Clerk of the U.S. House of while on Company time or on effects or retaliation. Representatives and Secretary of the Company premises. For further information about U.S. Senate.The Act applies when • Attempt to influence or pressure, political activities, refer to Corporate lobbying members of Congress,their directly or indirectly,any colleague, and Policy Political 106.0, Contributions. For questions Executive Branch.Certain lobbying supplier,client,or business partner about political activities,contri- activities are prohibited altogether,and to make any political contribution butions,and expenditures,contact no lobbying activity may be charged to or expenditure,or support any the Legal Department. state or federal contracts. Each state political party or candidate. For example,we may not ask our has its own laws governing lobbying of subordinates to purchase tickets state officials. to a political fundraiser. No employee or of the Company may engage in any lobbying on behalf of the Company without the prior written authorization of both the Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Legal Counsel. For additional guidance,or for clarification on whether proposed activities are or are not lobbying, contact Corporate Legal Counsel. 26 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 61C1-882862AOSCDA� 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 40 Acknowledgements and forms Emr' 'ee commitment As this code makes clear,the Company's success depends upon every employee adhering to the law and performing with the highest standards of business conduct and integrity. Employees will receive the code,either in hard copy or digital format,and will be required to participate in training and awareness sessions on the Company's ethics and compliance program.We are expected to confirm our understanding of the requirement to act responsibly on behalf of the Company by: s 01A Ek *clk rit^9 Ea Ek arEici aEit4g i ti r sourc s a LabL sav<dad rs of ' p ri,aduc Erai,tliv.g wk v, w v.. d cotkd.ucE itn Ek caurs s otn Eki,cs i,vk f ormaEiatn or cad , iHcludi►n99 avta campliatnc guiaavkc abouE atn all palici s avkd Eopi.cs r L vatikE Eo Eki,caL coKc rti or prot aur s EkaE our jobs. L gal issu , or Ea Eo our jobs. r porE atny acEi.avi Eko.E app ars 1 i, i,t kcotn i,sE v.E vai,Ek Eke Comppav\ 's sEaKaards of co►kaucE, vaiEkauE f ar of r Ealicaotn. All employees must have a signed commitment form in their personnel file. • _ - The signature on the form acknowledges that we have received the Company's code of conduct,that we have read the code,that we understand the code, and that we commit to adhering to the obligations expressed above.After we have read and signed the form on page 29, it should be returned it to our Human Resources representatives. v E o E y O Q� 27 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents DocuSign Envelope ID:4F582607-34AA-4FD5 61C1-682862A08CDA1.1.r 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 41 Thank you Thank you to all of the employees • ,'k f" who contributed by reviewing drafts x' , a..:.�', and providing their comments and i \. \: \ �r'.� concerns to the Ethics and Compliance i ' ,'. ,, ., �, Office in the preparation of ;� 'v!�:�;�' ' Building for the future:Our values, �' l �•,, principles,and standards. We ,„ . continue to welcome your ideas for y q'. f future updates and have provided a ' form on the next page for you to do t 010111 010111r/� so. In addition,we benchmarked our0 code of conduct against those of , NM ,4 other organizations. We appreciate i _,r the time and effort they spent in '';j =, sharing their work with us. Mt Sifiri 2 'S P ' ' ' '''' --'. . .: 4! .,- 7.7 The Company's success depends upon every employee adhering to the law and performing with the highest standards of business conduct and integrity. 28 Building for the future:Our values,principles,and standards Return to table of contents 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862AO8CDA1.1.4 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 142 ee Em to � Employee I commitment form I have received Atkins Code of Conduct, Building Employee signature for the future:Our values,principles,and standards. I have read the code and understand the standards that apply to my job. I understand that it Printed name represents mandatory policies of the Company and affirm that I will: • Adhere to the standards of conduct in the code, Employee number including all policies and procedures that apply to my job. • Participate in periodic training courses on ethics and Office location compliance topics relevant to my job. • Use one of the resources available when I need information or guidance about an ethical concern Date or legal issue, or to report any action that appears inconsistent with the Company's standards of conduct. Comments and Please print. suggestions form Your feedback will help us with communications, i policies, and future revisions of the code of conduct. Please share with us your comments, suggestions, criticisms,or questions,either by returning this form I to the Ethics and Compliance Office or via email at TPAEthics.na@atkinsglobal.com Thank you! 29 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA1.r 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 143 Please send this form to: Your human resources representative Please send this form to: Ethics and Compliance Office 4030 W. Boy Scout Blvd.,Suite 700 Tampa, FL 33607 or send an email to: TPAEthics.na@atkinsglobal.com Return to table of contents Q DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA1.1 ,r 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 44 Where to go for help ti If you are unsure of how to proceed in a particular situation, if you have a business conduct question or concern,or if you suspect wrongdoing, it is crucial to discuss the issue with appropriate Company personnel. Resources are available to assist you. We encourage you to first speak with your direct supervisor or manager if you have an ethics or compliance issue.You may also get help or advice from: s ► . or wavna r or ritistissq. ,_.. .. ...... ._ .. _... . vi.c pr si,d �E,or aonoEk r n4 rv,b r of nnaena9 rvt KE Lf (1) our i,rvirvt dCaE sup jour Ls u►nabl Ourc.ki, f Eki,cs and Eor sole Ek i,ssu , or �.onnplta►nce Officer. (2) you ar u►nconn f orEabL sp aki,ln9 Eo your sup rvi,sor abouE Ek issu . our Hunnain sourc s . r pr s ►nEaEi.v , a he Corvipavk 's Ethics rv+ rv+b r of Ek L gal oa10d Connpli,a►nc parEnn vnE r spoinsi,bL Wki.sEL blow r HoELLK tor k y�►naticLva►nd .5 '7 5104 ccousnEi,inc parEnn +nE; vnvi,ro►nrvi KE, H oak wkck Ls availabl Eo ava Saf Ey parErn KE; you, 24 hours a day, or oEk r Lonnpainy 7 do,yS a w k, r sours S. 4inginsigaggiliiiiiiiiiiii If you are unsure about where to find help,uncomfortable about using resources listed in the code,or want to raise an issue anonymously,the Ethics and Compliance Hotline is a resource you are encouraged to use. 31 Atkins Code of Conduct Return to table of contents 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5 B101-B82862A08CDAo.t 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 45 G -O C0p October 2013 OP 0 2013 Atkins 08126.W2013 — --- DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 146 MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786-394-4002 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-116-SR FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES(the RFQ) March 27, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. ATTACHED: Pre-Proposal Conference Sign-in Sheet 2. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED: Q#1: Is Access Management a part of"Project A"? A#1 Yes. The peer reviewer should provide relevant access management comments as they apply to the project traffic study. Q#2: Does the traffic study review process, where improvements (recommendations) are proposed for the study, the Engineer (responsible for traffic study) most times does not consider possible right of way impacts and constructability/feasibility issues. Does City's reviewer handle such issues during the traffic study phase or during the design phase (after Development approval)? A#2: The traffic study peer reviewer only gets involved during the review phase of traffic studies. However, the peer reviewer should offer comments in relation to right-of- way impacts and constructability/feasibility issues if relevant as part of the review. The City typically coordinates the responses to the peer reviewer comments with the applicant's traffic engineer. If a satisfactory response is not provided, the City could make a recommendation to the Planning Board to include certain conditions as part of the Planning Board order if necessary. Q#3: Project B requests for Autoturn evaluation for checking adequacy of turning radii. Does the applicant provide CAD file of the same to the City's reviewer along with the traffic study? A#3: Yes, the City would request the applicant to provide CAD files of the site plan so that the peer reviewer would use it to evaluate adequacy of turning radii. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov Contact: Telephone: I Email Sandra M. Rico J 305-673-7000 ext.6230 SRico@miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Si e y, 4 Al:x I-nis Pr.curement Director RFU No.2014-116-SR Addendum#1 3/26/14 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 47 M1AMJ BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-POPOSAL MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE: March 13, 2014 RFP No.: RFQ 2014-116-SR TITLE: TRAFFIC ENGINEERINGCONSULTINGSERVICES COMPAN`i'(r:, .'`, -N/'v 11tl..!If1 A RiPfl1 fYer 1 r-.'s, F IL.AVVRCJJ7 r '/.t-PI'1V -Y-; �. Sandra Rico Procurement-City of Miami Beach 305-673-7000 786.394.4404 srico@mlam ibeachfl.cov ext. 6230 oo / s YaYt e. rnr�aot,•n.a. caw. los-rg4-o73r �C,,l6L fe/+.c r I lir /Cf2.t 2e 2A ?iY-6e'0-777/ 6.40. 77Pr "4"aro laza ejheh acro, (c ) g 3 111 AjAil ifedifIA—a—4—'0 111 .e- e- CoS5g72„--)19 CI o F C1�-�'PM/MfQ_"_"' CAj5)(o73- 75 5f7 )(E L •-1 (QM f AM f P # . .. ` LL t 4� ` 3.6#4..) KiQA�NC Fr!" J aL na ] 7-7C- L/Cv ✓ut' P�Z � n�,�y./� 1 .�S-Sly-31. 2 Vµ Z , .VI t'(/ LI , rr�22j,. (/'-J Mohoux la.i tI-ey L9g Batt -- in RFQ 2014-116-SR PAGE OF 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 148 tv\IAM1 BEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE—PROPOSAL MEETING SIGN—IN SHEET COMPANY-NAM; i NAME ('LEASE PRINT) E MAIL'ADDR SS � �i PI1dOt# . �Da I i\a R'erngrMI Ernineeilil (2199.--t n PSE — 463-- t t g9r2Q.l4c�� OW VG. /NC. Nor- xioZ RFQ 2014-116-SR PAGE OF 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 149 a.) MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeochll.gov DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT Tel: 305-673-7490 Fax: 786.394-4002 ADDENDUM NO.2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 2014-116-SR FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES(the RFQ) April 1, 2014 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers, or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City. The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only. 1. DELETE: Delete Section 0300-Tab 3 and Tab 4 in its entirety. TAB-3 •__• of-Services-Rrepesed Smit-d: . : • - ... - • •• - :..• •- - ..• . . : technical-requirements tlined Appendix--G;-Mif m-Requi ••-• ••- -- -. .• . . . . .. .. .il--and4astude-su , -applicable--whish--wits-anew-the Submit eta• . ..• . . ... . . ....• I. : ::.• .. •--• —, . . . . , information,-as-appusable;-whish--:: - - .. ••-• •- - •. - • - •. •tation--play prejest--timeline, 2. Insert: Insert new Section 0300-Tab 3 modified as follows. TAB 3 Scope of Services Proposed Submit detailed information addressing how proposer will achieve each portion of the scope of services and technical requirements outlined in Appendix C, Minimum Requirements and Specifications. Responses shall be in sufficient detail and include supporting documentation, as applicable, which will allow the Evaluation Committee to complete a fully review and score the proposed scope of services. Proposers shall submit detailed information on how proposer plans to accomplish the required scope of services, including detailed information. as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to: implementation plan, project timeline, phasing options,testing and risk mitigation options for assuring project is implemented on time and within budget. _ Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Management Department to the attention of the individual named below, with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranadoRmiamibeachfl.gov. ( Contact: Telephone: Email: [ Sandra M. Rico 1305-673-7000 ext. 6230 SRico@miamibeachfl.gov RFQ No.2014-116-SR Page 1 of 2 Addendum#2 4/1/14 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 50 Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Potential proposers that have elected not to submit a response to the RFP are requested to complete and return the "Notice to Prospective Bidders" questionnaire with the reason(s) for not submitting a proposal. Sincerely, —4111111. moor Al:x D-- P .curement Director RFQ No.2014-116-SR Page 2 of 2 Addendum#2 4/1/14 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services j 51 1.3 Minimum qualifications requirements Atkins has successfully conducted several similar projects for municipalities We have addressed each of the minimum including the City of Miami Beach, City of qualifications requirements below. Coral Gables, City of Miami, City of Fort Location Lauderdale, Miami-Dade Public Schools, Atkins' Miami office—address below— is located and Broward County. within Miami-Dade County. We have included our local business tax receipt on page 59. Client 2001 Northwest 107th Avenue City of Miami Beach Miami, Florida 33172 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Project team qualifications Mr. Xavier Falconi, Planning Department The following projects—completed within the past 305.673.7000 I xavierfalconi@miamibeachfl.gov 5 years—are similar in size, scope, and budget to Project duration (term of engagement) the services requested by the City. These projects March 2012—April 2012 (3 weeks) include Project Types A and B services as described in the RFQ. In addition, we have included letters of Saxony Development, Traffic Impact Study recommendation on pages 61-62. Review, Miami Beach, Florida City of Miami Beach General Traffic Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic Engineering Consultant, Miami Beach, impact study that was completed by Kimley-Horn Florida (December 2009—Present) and Associates for the City of Miami Beach. The project consisted of a proposed redevelopment with Services include conducting and reviewing traffic a 210-room hotel, 57 residential condominiums, impact studies, DRIs, traffic circulation and parking 3,000-square-foot nightclub, 1,500-square-foot issues, developing conceptual improvement bar, 450-square-foot pool bar, and 673 restaurant alternatives, designing signal plans within the city, seats contained within four restaurants. Additionally, and updating the bicycle master plan, among other a 295-space mechanical parking garage, 18-room services. Projects under this contract include the boutique hotel, 7,551-square-foot ballroom, and following: 12,889 square feet of retail were analyzed for this proposed development. The analysis included 1155 Collins Avenue, Traffic Impact Study review of trip generation, intersection capacity Review, Miami Beach, Florida analysis including review of microsimulation files, Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic review of traffic counts, trip distribution, future impact study that was completed by Kimley-Horn background traffic, planned network improvements, and Associates for the City of Miami Beach. The maneuverability analysis for proposed valet-only project consisted of a proposed development with mechanical parking garage, review of valet operation a 15,301-square-foot retail store and 58-space analysis, and preparation of a memorandum mechanical parking garage. The analysis included documenting the findings of the traffic study review. review of trip generation, intersection capacity Role and assigned responsibilities analysis including review of microsimulation files, As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all review of traffic counts, future background traffic, aspects of the study review including implementation planned network improvements, maneuverability and follow-up with client on all comments analysis for proposed valet-only mechanical parking addressed, attendance at presentations and Planning garage, review of valet operation analysis, and Board meetings, and coordination with client. preparation of a memorandum documenting the Client findings of the traffic study review. City of Miami Beach Role and assigned responsibilities 1700 Convention Center Drive As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all Miami Beach, Florida 33139 aspects of the study review including implementation Mr. Xavier Falconi, Planning Department and follow-up with client on all comments 305.673.7000 I xavierfalconi@miamibeachfl.gov addressed, attendance at presentations and Planning Project duration (term of engagement) Board meetings, and coordination with client. February 2012—February 2012 (2 weeks) 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 52 Cadillac Hotel, Traffic Impact Study Review, Role and assigned responsibilities Miami Beach, Florida As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic aspects of the study review including implementation impact study that was completed by Kimley-Horn and follow-up with client on all comments and Associates for the City of Miami Beach. The addressed, attendance at presentations and Planning project consisted of a proposed redevelopment Board meetings, and coordination with client. with an 84-room hotel expansion to the existing Client 263-room Cadillac Hotel. The hotel expansion also City of Miami Beach included the construction of a 68-space mechanical 1700 Convention Center Drive valet parking garage. The analysis included review Miami Beach, Florida 33139 of trip generation, intersection capacity analysis Mr. Xavier Falconi, Planning Department including review of microsimulation files, review of 305.673.7000 I xavierfalconi@miamibeachfl.gov traffic counts, future background traffic, planned Project duration (term of engagement) network improvements, review of valet operation December 2011—February 2012 (8 weeks) analysis and mechanical parking garage queuing analysis, and preparation of a memorandum Terminal Isle, Traffic Impact Study, Miami documenting the findings of the traffic study review. Beach, Florida Role and assigned responsibilities Atkins conducted a traffic impact study for the As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all proposed relocation of towing storage facilities to aspects of the study review including implementation Terminal Island. The site is the location of an existing and follow-up with client on all comments City of Miami Beach facility currently in use by fleet addressed, attendance at presentations and Planning management operations and the sanitation division. Board meetings, and coordination with client. Terminal Island also includes other land uses such as Client the U.S. Coast Guard station, Florida Power & Light City of Miami Beach (FPL) station, cargo terminal, water pump station, 1700 Convention Center Drive Fisher Island ferry terminal, and 266-space surface Miami Beach, Florida 33139 parking lot. The analysis included a determination Mr. Xavier Falconi, Planning Department of the impact based on trip generation, a site visit 305.673.7000 I xavierfalconi@miamibeachfl.gov during a.m. and p.m. peak hours, on-site and off-site Project duration (term of engagement) traffic circulation, evaluation of trip distribution and November 2010—January 201 1 (8 weeks) traffic assignment based on proposed circulation, evaluation of background growth for future SLS Hotel South Beach, Transportation volumes, intersection operational analysis for existing Impact Study Review, Miami Beach, Florida conditions and future alternatives, intersection queue analysis, roadway link analysis, and review of existing Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic mass transit service at Terminal Island. Existing impact study that was completed by David Plummer bus service, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities were and Associates for the City of Miami Beach. The inventoried at the site to assess connectivity to the project consisted of the SLS Hotel South Beach City's transportation system. (formerly known as the Ritz Plaza Hotel) located at Role and assigned responsibilities 1701 Collins Avenue. The hotel portion (140 rooms) As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all of the project was previously approved. The applicant aspects of this study including implementation and had requested a conditional use permit for approval preparation of technical memorandum, attendance of ancillary uses within the property including several at presentations and City meetings, and coordination restaurants and lounges. The uses were open to the with client. general public. The analysis included review of trip generation, intersection capacity analysis including Client review of microsimulation files for existing and future City of Miami Beach conditions, trip distribution and traffic assignment, 1700 Convention Center Drive review of traffic counts, future background traffic, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 planned and committed network improvements, Mr. Jose Gonzalez, Transportation Manager review of valet operation stacking and queuing 305.673.7000 I jose.gonzalez@miamibeachfl.gov analysis, review of valet circulation, and preparation Project duration (term of engagement) of a memorandum documenting the findings of the August 2011—January 2012 (4 months) traffic study review. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 53 City of Coral Gables Traffic Engineering Consultant, Coral Gables, Florida (May Atkins is focused on meeting all 2012—Present) deadlines and providing quick Services include conducting and reviewing traffic turnarounds on all reports and impact studies, traffic counts, traffic calming and documentation needed. parking issues, safety and operational studies, plans review, design, speed surveys, and intersection delay studies within the city, among other services. Projects Role and assigned responsibilities under this contract include the following: As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all Chase Bank, LeJeune Road and 40th Street, aspects of the study review including implementation Traffic Impact Study Review, and follow-up with client on all comments Coral Gables, Florida addressed, attendance at presentations and City Commission meetings, and coordination with client. Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic Client impact study that was completed by Traf Tech for City of Coral Gables the City of Coral Gables. The project consisted of 2800 SW 72nd Avenue a vacant lot that previously had a gas station, and Miami, Florida 33155 the proposed development is a new branch bank Ms. Yamilet Senespleda, City Engineer of 4,120 square feet and two remote drive-through 305.460.5034 I ysenespleda@coralgables.com lanes. The analysis included review of trip generation, intersection capacity analysis including review of Project duration (term of engagement) microsimulation files, review of traffic counts, May 2013—June 2013 (3 weeks) queuing analysis for drive-through lane, and traffic 6372 Collins Avenue, Traffic Impact Study, circulation and trip distribution analysis. Miami Beach, Florida Role and assigned responsibilities As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all Atkins conducted a traffic impact study of a aspects of the study review including implementation proposed development with 19 residential units and follow-up with client on all comments for the developer. The existing land use consisted addressed, attendance at presentations and City of four residential units. The analysis included Commission meetings, and coordination with client. a determination of the impact based on trip generation, a site visit, on-site and off-site traffic Client circulation including signage and striping, evaluation City of Coral Gables of the sight distance triangle at the driveway, and 2800 SW 72nd Avenue evaluation of trip distribution and traffic assignment Miami, Florida 33155 based on proposed circulation. An AutoTURN Ms. Yamilet Senespleda, City Engineer analysis was also conducted for the accommodation 305.460.5034 I ysenespleda@coralgables.com of a loading zone within the property. Different Project duration (term of engagement) alternatives were evaluated including changes to the August 2012—November 2013 (3 months) site circulation to determine whether a loading zone could be accommodated. Aloft Hotel, 2524 LeJeune Road, Traffic Role and assigned responsibilities Impact Study Review, Coral Gables, Florida As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic aspects of this study including implementation and impact study that was completed by Richard preparation of technical memorandum, attendance Garcia and Associates for the City of Coral Gables. at presentations and Planning Board meetings, The project consisted of a site occupied with an and coordination with client and the City of Miami apartment complex and was redeveloped to include Beach. a hotel and retail space. The analysis included review Client of trip generation, intersection operational analysis Synalovski Romanik Saye including review of microsimulation files, review of 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 500 traffic counts, trip distribution and traffic assignment, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 future background traffic, planned network Mr. Manny Synalovski, Principal improvements, and preparation of a memorandum 954.961.6806 I msynalovski@synalvoski.com documenting the findings of the traffic study review. Project duration (term of engagement) January 2014—February 2014 (3 weeks) 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 154 U.S. Southern Command (SouthCom) enrollment; analyzed alternatives; and coordinated Headquarters, Traffic and Parking Study, with MDCPS and Miami-Dade County to ensure Doral, Florida approval of the study. Atkins professionals provided civil/site engineering Role and assigned responsibilities and design services as part of the Hensel Phelps As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for design-build team for a new $265 million complex all aspects of this study including implementation, on 55 acres of land that will serve as the SouthCom attendance at presentations, and coordination with headquarters. Providing 630,000 square feet client. of office space and accommodations for 2,800 Client personnel, the new facilities enabled all activities MC Harry Associates to be consolidated into one complex. The facility 2780 SW Douglas Road, Suite 302 consisted of three main buildings and three Miami, Florida 33133 outbuildings as well as parking for more than Mr. James W. Piersol, Principal 2,500 vehicles. Additional features include a child 305.445.3765 I jpiersol@mcharry.com development center, fitness center, and warehouse. Project duration (term of engagement) Atkins was selected to perform planning and traffic April 2012—October 2012 (6 months) engineering and parking services, which included extensive data collection and analysis efforts with Broward County Continuing Engineering the study area. More than 40 signalized intersections Services for Transportation and General were included. The analysis included traffic counts, Engineering Services, Broward County, traffic impact study, level-of-service analysis, signal Florida (May 2013—Present) plan design, and presentations. We completed this Services include roadway engineering, drainage, project on time and generated operational and geometric improvement recommendations. signalization and traffic engineering, signing and pavement marking plans, intelligent transportation Role and assigned responsibilities system (ITS), public involvement, and construction As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for administrative services, among other services. all aspects of this study including implementation Projects under this contract include the following: of quality control measures, attendance at presentations, and coordination with client. Hiatus Road Traffic Study, Broward County, Client Florida Hensel Phelps Construction Co. Atkins conducted a traffic study, which provides 6557 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 1 improvements to Hiatus Road from Sunrise Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32822 to Oakland Park Boulevard. Hiatus Road will be a Mr. Joseph Giunta, Project Manager new roadway connection between Sunrise Boulevard 305.482.0182 I jgiunta@henselphelps.com and Oakland Park Boulevard. This will provide a Project duration (term of engagement) north-south connection. It will alleviate some traffic January 2009—June 2009 (6 months) on Flamingo Drive and Nob Hill Road. The project includes traffic engineering services related to Primary Learning Center and iPreparatory the traffic flow modification on Hiatus Road from Academy, Traffic Impact Study, Miami-Dade Sunrise Boulevard to Oakland Park Boulevard and County, Florida the evaluation of a street closure on the northern Atkins conducted a traffic impact study and end of the project. The analysis consisted of data alternative evaluation study for the Primary Learning collection, trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment, traffic forecasting, the evaluation of Center and iPreparatory Academy located in Broward County SERPM model to determine the downtown Miami. The Primary Learning Center isgrowth factor with and without the project, field an elementary magnet school, and iPreparatory observations during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods, Academy is a magnet high school. MDCPS wanted and the technical memorandum documenting the to conduct a study to determine the traffic impacts for future expansion of both schools including an findings and recommendations from the study. evaluation for a pick-up and drop-off area, among Role and assigned responsibilities other alternatives. As part of the traffic study, Atkins As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for all reviewed and analyzed existing traffic conditions; aspects of this study including the traffic analysis, performed data collection; reviewed trip generation, implementation and preparation of technical trip distribution, and traffic assignments; analyzed memorandum, QA/QC, and coordination with client. existing and future conditions with the increase in 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 155 Client Broward County Engineering Atkins project manager, Darlene M. 1 N University Drive, Suite 300B Fernandez, P.E. has been a pleasure to Plantation, Florida 33324 work with. She understands the needs Ms. Ailyn Costa, PE, Design Section Manager of local, federal and State agencies and 954.577.4627 I acosta@broward.org the issues that need to be addressed Project duration (term of engagement) to achieve the right recommendations October 2013—December 2013 (2 months) within the standards, policies and Broward County Convention Center and guidelines that govern this type of Hotel Expansion Traffic Study, Broward work. She is easy to work with, always County, Florida provides prompt responses on any requests and submits all work on time. Atkins conducted a traffic study to determine the Yamilet Senespleda, PE existing Broward County Convention Center traffic prior to the hotel expansion. The analysis included City Engineer, City of Coral Gables evaluating existing and future traffic conditions, traffic data collection, adjustments to the traffic data contract with the City of Miami Beach and City of with the peak season factor, and operational analysis Coral Gables and has successfully provided various of eight intersections on SE 17th Street with and transportation and traffic engineering services to the without the convention center traffic. City. She has consistently met the City's schedules, Role and assigned responsibilities even when presented with limited a time frame to As prime consultant, Atkins was responsible for get the project completed. all aspects of this study including implementation Ms. Fernandez served as a project manager for the and preparation of technical memorandum, QA/ Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District QC, attendance at meetings with the County, and Six Traffic Operations Department for more than coordination with client. 4 years. She also served as acting transportation Client manager for the City of Miami Beach Public Works Broward County Engineering Department. Ms. Fernandez understands key traffic 1 N. University Drive, Suite 300B and transportation issues in highly urbanized areas Plantation, Florida 33324 and has experience conducting, analyzing, and Ms. Ailyn Costa, PE, Design Section Manager reviewing traffic studies for FDOT and the City 954.577.4627 I acosta@broward.org of Miami Beach Public Works Department. She Project duration (term of engagement) understands the sensitivities and needs of local October 2013—December 2013 (2 months) municipalities. More importantly, Ms. Fernandez understands the transportation challenges presented Project manager experience by dense urban environments and small cities. She Atkins has assembled a team of highly qualified also has experience handling design build projects, professionals who are intimately familiar with the which incorporate her understanding of design issues City's needs and procedures and who can ensure that may arise from an alternative proposed for that all assignments are completed on time, within implementation. Her effective project management budget, and at the highest level of technical skills are further strengthened by her strong technical excellence. background and hands-on approach. She remains personally involved on assignments from the project Darlene Fernandez, PE, our proposed project start through completion, providing the team with manager is a proven, effective, and experienced supervision, guidance, and quality control. project manager. She is a transportation and traffic engineer with more than 11 years of experience Her project experience includes the following: in traffic operations, transportation planning, and Chase Bank, LeJeune Road and 40th Street, project development and engineering (PD&E) studies and is committed to completing assignments to Traffic Impact Study Review, Coral Gables, the City's satisfaction. She is responsible for traffic Florida engineering analyses; supervision and production Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic of signal timing plans; traffic operations and traffic impact study that was completed by Traf Tech for impact studies; macro- and microsimulation traffic the City of Coral Gables. The project consisted of modeling; access and parking studies; and plans a vacant lot that previously had a gas station, and review. Ms. Fernandez is currently managing a similar the proposed development is a new branch bank 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 156 of 4,120 square feet and two remote drive-through lanes. The analysis included review of trip generation, Atkins is committed to allocating the intersection capacity analysis including review of resources necessary to complete this microsimulation files, review of traffic counts, project, and we have the capacity to queuing analysis for drive-through lane, and traffic perform the work on time and within circulation and trip distribution analysis. budget. Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of this study review including implementation and follow-up with client on all comments addressed, attendance of the sight distance triangle at the driveway, and at presentations and City Commission meetings, and evaluation of trip distribution and traffic assignment coordination with client. based on proposed circulation. An AutoTURN analysis was also conducted for the accommodation Client of a loading zone within the property. Different City of Coral Gables alternatives were evaluated including changes to the 2800 SW 72nd Avenue site circulation to determine whether a loading zone Miami, Florida 33155 could be accommodated. Ms. Yamilet Senespleda, City Engineer 305.460.5034 I ysenespleda@coralgables.com Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of this study including implementation and preparation of Project completion technical memorandum, attendance at presentations November 2013 and Planning Board meetings, and coordination with 100 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida client and the City of Miami Beach. Atkins conducted peer review services for a traffic Client impact study that was completed by Kimley-Horn Synalovski Romanik Saye 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 500 and Associates for the City of Coral Gables. The Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 project consisted of a mixed-use development consisting of residential and retail uses. The proposed 9MManny I msynalovski@synalvoski.com Principal 54.961.680066 development will consist of a 188-unit high-rise 95ynlovski@synalvoski.com apartment building and 3,000 square feet of Project completion specialty retail space. The analysis included review of February 2014 trip generation, intersection capacity analysis, review Broward County Convention Center and of traffic counts, review of traffic circulation and trip Hotel Expansion Traffic Study, Broward distribution analysis, and traffic assignment. p Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of this County, Florida study review including implementation and follow- Atkins conducted a traffic study to determine the up with client on all comments addressed, quality existing Broward County Convention Center traffic assurance/quality control (QA/QC), attendance at prior to the hotel expansion. The analysis included meetings, and coordination with client. evaluating existing and future traffic conditions, Client traffic data collection, adjustments to the traffic data City of Coral Gables with the peak season factor, and operational analysis 2800 SW 72nd Avenue of eight intersections on SE 17 Street with and without the convention center traffic. Miami, Florida 33155 Ms. Yamilet Senespleda, City Engineer Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of this 305.460.5034 I ysenespleda@coralgables.com study including implementation and preparation Project completion of technical memorandum, QA/QC, attendance at January 2014 meetings with the County, and coordination with client. 6372 Collins Avenue, Traffic Impact Study, Client Miami Beach, Florida Broward County Engineering Atkins conducted a traffic impact study of a 1 N. University Drive, Suite 300B proposed development with 19 residential units Plantation, Florida 33324 for the developer. The existing land use consisted Ms. Ailyn Costa, PE, Design Section Manager of four residential units. The analysis included 954.577.4627 acosta@broward.org a determination of the impact based on trip Project completion generation, a site visit, on-site and off-site traffic December 2013 circulation including signage and striping, evaluation 0001.039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 57 Krome Avenue Truck Bypass Study, FDOT Client District Six, Miami-Dade County, Florida FDOT District Six While employed with another firm, Ms. Fernandez 1000 NW 111th Avenue conducted a traffic study for FDOT to review Miami, Florida 33172 alternate options for a dedicated truck bypass on Mr. Khalil Maarouf, El, Project Manager Krome Avenue. The project included preparing a 305.470.5100 khalil.maaroufQdot.state.fl.us study documenting the requirements for preliminary Project completion design including existing conditions, typical sections, September 2010 right-of-way requirements, traffic control plans, environmental impacts, and costs improvements for Hiatus Road Traffic Study, Broward County, the truck bypass on SR 997/Krome Avenue from Florida Flagler Avenue to SW 316th Street. Also, the project Atkins conducted a traffic study, which provides included a traffic operational analysis of more than improvements to Hiatus Road from Sunrise Boulevard 40 signalized intersections in the City of Homestead to Oakland Park Boulevard. Hiatus Road will be a and traffic forecast for the opening year and design new roadway connection between Sunrise Boulevard year. There were eight alternatives presented to the and Oakland Park Boulevard. This will provide a community, City of Homestead, and FDOT. north-south connection. It will alleviate some traffic Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of on Flamingo Drive and Nob Hill Road. The project the study analysis including implementation and includes traffic engineering services related to follow-up with client, attendance at presentations the traffic flow modification on Hiatus Road from with homeowners and the City of Homestead, and Sunrise Boulevard to Oakland Park Boulevard and coordination with client. the evaluation of a street closure on the northern Client end of the project. The analysis consisted of data FDOT District Six collection, trip generation, trip distribution and traffic 1000 NW 111th Avenue assignment, traffic forecasting, the evaluation of Miami, Florida 33172 Broward County SERPM model to determine the Mi Ms. Jeannine 3317 de, El, Project Manager growth factor with and without the project, field 305.470.5100 � Jeannine.gaslonde�dot.state.fl.us observations during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods, and the technical memorandum documenting the Project completion findings and recommendations from the study. March 2010 Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of this Districtwide Traffic Operations Studies, study including the traffic analysis, implementation FDOT District Six, Miami-Dade County, and preparation of technical memorandum, QA/QC, Florida and coordination with client. While with another firm, Ms. Fernandez served Client as traffic operations analyst for this contract. She 1 N University County Drive,Engineeringuite performed advanced traffic engineering analysis; 1 N Suite 300B Plantation, Florida 33324 analyzed traffic data using traffic models such as Synchro/Sim Traffic, CORSIM, and Highway Capacity Ms. Ailyn Costa, PE, Design Section Manager 954.577.4627 Software (HCS); prepared traffic engineering studies acosta@broward.org according to current practice; performed traffic Project completion engineering analysis and prepared traffic safety and December 2013 operational studies; provided justification for traffic Availability and license control devices and prepared the necessary traffic regulations; reviewed and analyzed engineering Availability of staff is based on not only quantity, but reports prepared by consultants, other departmental also on committing the right staff at the right time units, and other agencies; used geographic for the right task. Atkins is committed to allocating information systems (GIS) application for traffic the resources necessary to complete this project, and analysis; and developed minor design projects for we have the capacity to perform the work on time traffic operations. and within budget. Ms. Fernandez was responsible for all aspects of this Atkins makes the commitment that all key personnel study analysis including implementation and follow- will be dedicated and available as necessary to meet up with client and coordination with client. the City's needs. Based on our current and projected staff workload, we can immediately proceed with the City's assignments. We are interested in and excited about this project. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins ISO ? for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 58 Effective project management will allow current staff These communication networks enable our project and company workloads to be adjusted to stay on managers to coordinate the resources of our entire schedule. Our commitment and additional support firm to complete assignments. available throughout our network of offices present Ms. Fernandez will be 70 percent available for this the City with a responsive and available project team. project. She is fully committed to the City and will be Atkins has 16 offices in Florida. The support available 24/7 via phone or email. provided by our Florida offices is further facilitated Ms. Fernandez is a Florida licensed professional by Atkins' immediate and fluid communication engineer—License No. 76507. A copy of her license network among offices as well as our common is included on page 59. We have also included organizational structure and management hierarchy. Atkins' Florida licenses on page 60. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services ' 59 000524 Local Business Tax Receipt Miami-Dade County, State of FloridaLBT -THIS IS NOT A BILL-DO NOT PAY 6796545 BUSINESS NAME/LOCATION RECEIPT NO. EXPIRES ATKINS NORTH AMERICA INC RENEWAL SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 2001 NW 107 AVE 1597179 Must be displayed at place of business DORAL FL 33172 Pursuant to County Code Chapter 8A-Art.9&10 OWNER SEC.TYPE OF BUSINESS PAYMENT RECEIVED ATKINS NORTH AMERICA INC 212 P.AJCORP/PARTNERSHIP/FIRM BY TAX COLLECTOR Employee(s) 259 024 $1 1 65.50 08/14/2013 FPPU06-1 3-003488 This Local Business Tax Receipt only confirms payment of the Local Business Tax.The Receipt is not a license, permit,or a certification of the holder's qualifications,to do business. Holder must comply with any governmental or nongovernmental regulatory laws and requirements which apply to the business. The RECEIPT NO.above must be displayed on all commercial vehicles-Miami-Dade Code Sec 8a-276. For more iefo,mation,visit www,miam dyTle.nov/taxcollector tate oFlorida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Darlene Marie Fernandez, P.E. I BPE I)tllit11it r\S lI I is licensed as a Professional Engineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration: 2/28/2015 P.E. Lic.No: Audit No: 228201532902 ID 76507 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 60 ATKINS Engineering -_ State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Atkins North America, Inc. A is outhoriied under rhe provisions of Section 471.023,Florida Statutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engineer,duly licensed under Chapter 471,Florido Statutes. Expiration:2!28/2015 CA Lic.No: Audit No: 228201503309 Certificate of Authorization 24 Architecture STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ❑■ :l; El BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE&INTERIOR DESIGN r�r:A • .`Tii-4 i LICENSE NUMBER 1 Y 7r1, AAC000723v�y 1' The ARCHITECT CORPORATION ;�' o., Named below IS CERTIFIED 0 :•... Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date: FEB 28,2015 A40KINS 30WBOYTH SOTBOA UINV 4030 W BOY SCOUT BOULEVARD SUITE 700 ligr TAMPA FL 33607 81180!101 RICK SCOTT ISSUED. 01002013 SEG B u3010$0000552 KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW SECRETARY Surveying 1'T� Department artment of AgConsumertnre and Consumer Servicess` _ � Division of Consumer Services License No.:LB24 •v 4 i'�`�Y Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers -.�,-_ 2005 Apalachee Pkway Tallahassee,Florida 32399.6500 Expiration Date February 28,2015 Professional Surveyor and Mapper Business License Under the provisions of Chapter 472.Florida Statutes ATKINS NORTH AMERICA,INC. ATTN:LEGAL DEPT.4030 W BOY SCOUT BLVD STE 700 /J TAMPA.FL 33607-5713 G. 'to. e-w...� ADAM H.PUTNAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE Landscape RICK SCOTT,GOVERNOR STATE OF FLORIDA KEN LAWSON,SECRETARY Architecture DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION ■ BOARD OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ti.f.• • ❑ LICENSE NUMBER •r}I r y LCC000052 -S The LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BUSINESS _ i• ?u Named below HAS REGISTERED • \_ `� T ❑ {,la Under the provisions of Chapter 481 FS. Expiration date. NOV 30.2015i \;, ATKINS NORTH AMERICA.INC �\ HEATHER MADONNA V,, `\ 4030 W BOY SCOUT BLVD STE 700 ii lat.N. \\\I' TAMPA FL 33607 -.4,11%... 7-•:\� ‘S.I.:::i.,.` M1 i 500.1 ti:..4� \Vs \1V. ISSUED: 11142013, SEQO L1311140001010 0001.039184.0414 ' Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 61 m MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Reach,Florida 33139,www.miamibeachf gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tel 305 673 7080,Fax 305.673 7028 March 26. 2014 Reference Letter Atkins Global, Inc. To whom it may concern Atkins Global, Inc. has provided professional traffic engineering and traffic planning consulting services for the City of Miami Beach Atkins Global, Inc. completed has various traffic studies for the City in the last three (3) years. including Drexel Avenue Closure and Dade Boulevard Intersection Level of Service Analysis For these studies, Atkins Global. Inc performed traffic engineering tasks and extensive public outreach. Currently,Atkins Global, Inc.is performing the Bicycle Master Plan Update for the City of Miami Beach The Bicycle Master Plan Update effort includes significant planning, traffic engineering, and public outreach components Atkins has provided exemplary level of service to the City of Miami Beach showing proficient responsiveness, readiness. knowledge. Atkins Global. Inc. is currently part of the professional service rotational list for the City Atkins obtained the contract via a competitive process.Atkins Global, Inc. has shown willingness to negotiate with the City of Miami Beach and has provided competitive industry prices. Sincerely. • osiel Ferrer-Diaz E.I. Transportation Coordinator a.. --n:r.m^ci c.•. d ng exceiktnt public servce and t o/i who fhe work.and p'a. ,. ur vibrant rropua' ' , -nmmunrh 0001.039184.0414 AtkinsSO for the Ci of Miami Beach, Florida I Q DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services ! 62 , �' The City of Coral Gables 't.i)Rlt! Public Works Department March 19,2014 2800 SW 72 AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33155 Re: Reference Letter for Services provided by Atkins To Whom It May Concern: Atkins has been the Professional Traffic Engineering Consultant for the City of Coral Gables since May 2012. They are responsible for all types of services in traffic engineering which include but are not limited to speed surveys,traffic counts,traffic impact studies, safety studies, level of service analysis, presentations to the public and City officials, and plans review and design. As part of the work,Atkins coordinates with other agencies and applicants as necessary to provide timely engineering decisions and direction to resolve issues that arise from traffic studies. The Atkins team is highly responsive and provides a quick turn around on all projects. They have been sensitive to the City's needs and submit their work with high quality. Atkins is always willing to go a step beyond their duties to complete all tasks. This team has demonstrated flexibility on budget constraints and there have been no issues with negotiations on any task order as part of this contract. Atkins project manager, Darlene M. Fernandez, P.E. has been a pleasure to work with. She understands the needs of local, federal and State agencies and the issues that need to be addressed to achieve the right recommendations within the standards,policies and guidelines that govern this type of work. She is easy to work with, always provides prompt responses on any requests and submits all work on time. If you need further information,I may be reached at 305-460-5034. Sincerely, Yamilet Sen-spleda,P.E. City Engineer P.O.Box 141549 CoRAL.GABLES,ROMA 33114-1549 PHONE(305)460-5000 FAX(305)460-5080 0001.039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Mil' eac orida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4F05-B1C1-B82862A08CDA .. C " Di m x -r10 n rD Dl -, O � to (D Dl a Tab 2: Experience and qualifications DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 163 2. Experience and qualifications The Atkins team's projects highlight the cost-effective and proven delivery you can expect to receive—demonstrating our ability to communicate, coordinate, and exceed your project goals. 2.1 Qualifications of proposing firm Overview and history Atkins' high volume of repeat business— Atkins has served the engineering needs of Florida nearly 90 percent—is a reflection of our communities since the firm was founded in Miami, sincere commitment to client service. Florida, in 1960. Our corporate structure allows us to draw upon the technical resources of our entire firm, as needed, to successfully accomplish any assignment. In south Florida, Atkins has Atkins continues to promote the philosophy of our approximately 200 employees. This means we can founders by stressing the relentless pursuit of quality provide individualized local service and world-class and excellence in the services we provide. As one of technology to all of our clients. the nation's largest multidisciplinary consulting firms, Being Florida based, much of our experience we offer core services in engineering, surveying isand mapping, construction management, program drawn from solving problems unique to the Southeast. Our large volume of repeat business management, planning, scientific disciplines, reflects the firm's commitment to: architecture, landscape architecture, and information technologies. •Professionally completing assignments on time and Our clients represent a mix of public and private within budget. sectors and include municipalities and counties; state •Seeking innovative, but practical solutions to departments of transportation; land developers; problems when more traditional approaches do not airports; power utilities; toll road agencies; meet the client's needs. contractors; and other regional, state, and federal Atkins is one of America's leading providers of agencies. We aim to be a single source solution engineering, planning, architecture, construction, through the provision of world-class technology and environmental, and program management services personal service on all of our projects, whether large and has approximately 2,700 employees and 70 or small. offices nationwide. Our professionals offer the deep-rooted commitment Atkins has the capacity to provide complete services of residents who live and work in the area and to clients beginning with problem definition and offer specialized expertise in their respective continuing through field studies, site evaluations, areas of practice. Many are recognized nationally preliminary design, final design, construction and internationally as technical leaders for their administration, and start-up assistance. Staff contributions to the communities with whom they specialty groups and technical experts work in have worked. Together, they offer the City a unique concert with the regional offices close to the project breadth and depth of experience, which stems from site to provide a thorough and coordinated approach their involvement with projects for the City as well as to solving specific problems to satisfy client needs. other coastal communities and urban environments across the United States. No matter what the scope of a project may be— large or small; planning, design, or construction; or Atkins' high volume of repeat business—nearly 90 project management or technology-driven—Atkins is percent—is a reflection of our sincere commitment committed to providing comprehensive services that to client service. Our professional experts work will help clients meet their goals. As the challenges together to provide complete services to clients facing our clients have multiplied and driven them from project initiation to closeout. Using proven into uncharted territory, we have expanded our communications strategies, we seek to understand menu of services to respond accordingly, focusing on client objectives and goals to achieve success on innovation and excellence. every project. The strong rapport and strategic partnerships we form with clients result in maximum 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 164 efficiency, productivity, and long-term benefits with an eye toward total requirements—short- during project assignments and long after project term and long-term. Our experience encompasses completion. the ability to coordinate numerous disciplines We are confident our team's many years of from a project's inception through its design and experience with similar projects has provided them construction, a task which is frequently required in with the expertise and skills required to assist the a traffic engineering assignment. Our coordination City with its key intended outcome of maintaining efforts often expand into periodic field reviews and and improving traffic flow conditions citywide. refinements on behalf of our clients. Atkins is committed to providing the City with a We apply numerous traffic models in operational responsive team of professionals who are dedicated and design analyses to ensure cost efficiency. Atkins to delivering the quality services our clients expect maintains a full complement of state-of-the-art traffic from us. To best respond to the City's needs, all engineering software including VisSim, Synchro, and work assignments for this project will be managed HCS 2010, which allows our staff to evaluate and from our Miami office. Our proposed staff will be design operating systems; evaluate safety aspects; available for all work assignments and is prepared and refine parking, access, and circulation systems to be available to the City's staff throughout the for any number of clients in various development duration of the program. categories. The software also enables our engineers to accurately evaluate the existing traffic operational Transportation systems and examine various alternative scenarios to Atkins is a recognized leader in creating solutions recommend the optimal solution. to today's complex urban and rural transportation Transportation planning problems. We provide clients with a complete range of transportation disciplines needed for timely Transportation planning requires that existing and and successful completion of any transportation future conditions be evaluated in a comprehensive assignment. Our staff includes specialists in the manner to determine the impact of transportation following areas: projects on the natural environment and general public. Our staff has a wealth of experience •Traffic engineering developed through years of performing a range of •Traffic and corridor studies and reviews transportation planning studies involving all modes •Transportation planning and roadway design of travel under various development conditions: •Bike/pedestrian planning rural, suburban, and urban. •Mobility plans Atkins' transportation planning experience includes the conception of future facilities during regional •Concurrency management long-range planning processes; development of •Signalization and lighting staging and implementation guides during master •ITS/tolls planning activities; and the location, development, •Multimodal/transit systems and environmental assessment of corridors. In •Information solutions addition, Atkins' planning experts have developed specialized expertise in hurricane evacuation •Program management planning analysis used by clients throughout •Constructability/construction management the United States in developing natural disaster •Transportation financing and strategic planning response plans; pavement management system •Cost estimating implementation used to plan advanced programming of capital improvement funding; and feasibility •Surveying analyses for transportation projects, with particular •Structural design success in the area of toll feasibility projects. •Right-of-way property acquisition and relocation By maintaining a network of transportation •Aviation planning staff throughout our organization, Atkins' professionals are involved in a variety of challenging Traffic engineering project activities. Specific areas of expertise include: Today's traffic engineer must be aware of a •Land-use planning. multitude of techniques—some new and innovative •Origin-designation surveys. and others tried and true. Experience is the key to .Travel characteristics surveys. providing successful traffic engineering solutions. Our distinctive solutions to traffic engineering •Long-range transportation plans (LRTP). challenges are developed by investigating possibilities •Travel demand forecasts, model development 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-682862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 165 •City of Miami Beach General Traffic Engineering Consultant, Miami Beach, Florida Atkins is a recognized leader in creating -1155 Collins Avenue, Traffic Impact Study Review, solutions to today's complex urban and Miami Beach, Florida rural transportation problems. —Saxony Development, Traffic Impact Study Review, Miami Beach, Florida —Cadillac Hotel, Traffic Impact Study Review, and validation, and management/congestion Miami Beach, Florida management systems. —SLS Hotel South Beach, Transportation Impact •Alignment studies. Study Review, Miami Beach, Florida •Alternatives analysis. —Terminal Isle, Traffic Impact Study, Miami Beach, •Traffic impact studies. Florida •Development impact analysis. •City of Coral Gables Traffic Engineering Consultant, •Regional and subarea transportation planning. Coral Gables, Florida •Suburban mobility initiatives. —Chase Bank, LeJeune Road and 40th Street, Traffic Impact Study Review, Coral Gables, Florida •Public participation and interagency coordination. —Aloft Hotel, 2524 LeJeune Road, Traffic Impact •Pavement management systems studies. Study Review, Coral Gables, Florida •Hurricane evacuation planning. •6372 Collins Avenue, Traffic Impact Study, •Master planning (multimodal). Miami Beach, Florida Relevant experience •SouthCom Headquarters, Traffic and Parking Study, We understand the importance of delivering quality Doral, Florida project reports and contract documents within •Primary Learning Center and iPreparatory Academy, established time frames. Our history of completing Traffic Impact Study, Miami-Dade County, Florida jobs on time, within budget, and in a professional •Broward County Continuing Engineering Services manner has led to a business base consisting largely for Transportation and General Engineering of repeat clients. We have included our similar Services, Broward County, Florida project experience in Tab 1. The projects included —Hiatus Road Traffic Study, Broward County, follow. Per the RFQ, for each project we included a Florida project description, agency name, agency contact, —Broward County Convention Center and Hotel contact telephone and email, and years and term of Expansion Traffic Study, Broward County, Florida engagement. • 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 166 2.2 Qualifications of proposer team Gerald Bolden, PE, PTOE Paramount to achieving project success is assembling Project traffic engineer a strong project team that can efficiently and Mr. Bolden has more than 17 years effectively support the City. We have accomplished 0 of experience in traffic engineering, this with team members who have the qualifications transportation planning, and and experience to perform all anticipated work, as functional design. His specific shown on our organizational chart (Figure 1). Each experience includes traffic signal brings a proven track record and the capacity to design; traffic signal operations maintain aggressive schedules and produce excellent and timing; capacity analysis and results. modeling using HCS, CORSIM, and Synchro; traffic Highlights of our team members' qualifications and impact studies; corridor studies; ITS planning and experience follow. Resumes are included at the end design; roadway safety audits; interchange studies; of this section. intersection geometric designs; workzone traffic John Hibbard, PE control plans; and cost estimates. Principal-in-charge Joe Perri Mr. Hibbard is a vice president Project traffic engineer and division manager with Mr. Perri has 23 years of Atkins' regional ITS division and expertise in traffic engineering is responsible for overseeing the and ITS. He has been involved growth of Atkins' ITS practice. with the preparation of various He has 26 years of experience traffic engineering design plans managing the development of ITS including signalization, signing A plans for urban freeway and rural ITS design projects. and pavement marking plans, His background includes the planning, design, and minor roadway design. Mr. Perri has managed implementation, operation, and management of ITS several districtwide traffic operations and ITS from agency and private-sector perspectives. contracts for FDOT for which he assigned resources to various projects and managed project schedules. Paul Mannix, PE, PTOE His experience in ITS includes planning, analysis, QA/QC design, integration, and construction engineering Mr. Mannix has more than and inspection (CEI). 19 years of experience and Patrick Nevah, PE serves as southeast regional Project traffic engineer manager for the traffic and ITS group for Atkins' ITS sector in Mr. Nevah has 9 years of the company's central Florida experience as lead designer, "' en location. His experience includes project�. engineer, and engineer- extensive traffic signal design and traffic engineering .L.-- of-record for projects including study development as well as signing and pavement signalization and signing and marking design, plus ITS planning, design, ip pavement markings, turnpike construction, operations, and maintenance. and interchange ITS, minor districtwide roadway work, and traffic engineering Darlene Fernandez, PE studies. His expertise includes the development Project manager of specifications, technical special provisions, Ms. Fernandez has more than technology review of new products, cost estimates, 11 years of experience in traffic typical section packages, and pavement design. ilitilia operations analysis, traffic Jeremy Bourdon, PE modeling, access management, Design engineer and traffic signalization design including signing and pavement Mr. Bourdon is the transportation markings, transportation manager in Atkins' Miami office. :.. ,41 planning, design, construction management, and He has 17 years of transportation project management. She is proficient in Synchro/ experience and is responsible SimTraffic, HCS, GIS applications, and MicroStation. for project management; staff it management; preparation of plans, schedules, staff-hour estimates, and job 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-682862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 167 Figure 1. Project organizational chart City of Miami Beach Principal-in-Charge John Hibbard, PE* Project Manager QA/QC Darlene Fernandez, PE Paul Mannix, PE, PTOE Project Traffic Engineers Gerald Bolden, PE*+, PTOE Joe Perri Patrick Nevah, PE Design Engineer Jeremy Bourdon, PE Senior Planners *Registered PE in state other Wiley Page Jr., AICP Wiatt Bowers, AICP than Florida *Florida PE application in process budgets; performance of preliminary engineering (MPO), Baker County, and the City of Jacksonville design; oversight of final plans and reports; and Beach. Mr. Page has managed the development and coordination of work with other engineers and implementation of numerous plans and programs professionals. including a study to examine the development of 75,000 acres in Bay County, which includes a new AICP Wiley Page Jr., international airport. Senior planner Mr. Page is the senior Wiatt Bowers, AICP transportation planning group Senior planner manager for Atkins' Florida Mr. Bowers is a senior statewide transportation planning transportation and land use group. He has 23 years of planner with nearly 20 years of experience in the area of urban and Alleis experience. His primary areas of regional transportation planning. expertise include corridor studies His responsibilities include managing several general and master plans, development support contracts where Atkins provides on-call of LRTPs, travel demand services for clients such as FDOT, Florida/Alabama modeling, transit planning, traffic impact studies for Transportation Planning Organization (TPO), DRIB and other large projects, concurrency studies, Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization and mobility plans. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 68 Education John Hibbard, PE M.S., Civil Engineering, Georgia Institute of Principal-in-Charge Technology, 1986 B.C.E., Civil Engineering, John Hibbard is a vice president and division manager with Atkins' regional ITS Georgia Institute of division and is responsible for overseeing the growth of Atkins' ITS practice. He Technology, 1985 has 26 years of experience managing the development of ITS plans for urban Registrations/licenses freeway and rural ITS design projects. His background includes the planning, Professional engineer: design, implementation, operation, and management of ITS from agency and Georgia 20237, 1992 private-sector perspectives. Washington 43583, On-Call ITS Services, Maricopa County Department of Transportation 2007 (MCDOT), Maricopa County, AZ. As project manager, provided overall Mississippi 18421, 2008 project direction. This contract with MCDOT involved on-call ITS services on Texas 101475, 2008 an as-needed basis. Services under this multiyear contract include ITS concept Nevada 021099, 2011 planning, master planning, communications planning and design, and arterial Tennessee 00106855 advanced traffic management system (ATMS)/ITS design. Past activities under Honors and awards this contract have included support for development of ITS concepts for Recipient, Karl Bevins deployment in association with the expansion and modification of Phoenix's Outstanding Traffic Engineer Sky Harbor International Airport and development of an ITS concept report for Award, Georgia Section, MC85, a major east-west corridor in Maricopa County. Institute of Transportation ATMS Feasibility Study and Implementation Plan, Osceola County, Engineers (ITE), 2011 Kissimmee, FL. As principal-in-charge, provided overall project direction Recipient, Joseph M. Thomas and gave advice and technical direction to design staff. This project for Young Member Award, Osceola County consisted of a feasibility study for an ATMS for the County Southern District, ITE, 1998 and development of an implementation plan. The study evaluated the current system, determined the County's future needs, and formulated Professional affiliations an implementation strategy for the ATMS that integrated the County's Intelligent Transportation computerized signal system and selected ITS components including dynamic Society of America (ITSA), message sign (DMS) systems, video monitoring, incident detection, and Georgia Chapter Director regional center-to-center communication. Atkins led coordination with local ITE and regional agencies to develop an implementation plan. National Committee on Countywide ITS Program Management Services, Sarasota County, Uniform Traffic Control Sarasota County, FL. Plan reviewer responsible for QA/QC services for Devices, Secretary ITS plans and specifications development. This contract with Sarasota County involved providing system management services for the $15 million, countywide ATMS deployment including the continued maintenance of the project system engineering management plan, stakeholder coordination, and development of a concept of operations and requirements traceability verification matrix that will form the basis for final plans. Final plans addressed modification to signal controllers, addition of closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, addition of arterial DMSs, and deployment of a fiber telecommunications network to support these devices. City of Arlington Entertainment District ITS Services, City of Arlington (TX), Arlington,TX.As a technical expert resource, participated in the software evaluation effort, reversible lane system design, portable DMS specification development, and development of the traveler information system. This project for the City of Arlington involved ITS implementation for venues in the Arlington Entertainment District. Tasks included an accelerated deployment for the design and installation of devices (CCTV cameras, portable DMSs, and permanent DMSs), reversible lane systems implementation, development of phone-based traveler information systems, quantity/cost estimates, and location selection assistance for the event traffic management center. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 69 Education Paul Mannix, PE, PTOE M.S., Civil Engineering QA/QC Emphasis), University of Wyoming, 1995 B.S., Civil Engineering, Paul Mannix has more than 19 years of experience and serves as southeast Montana State University, regional manager for the traffic and ITS group for Atkins' ITS sector in the 1993 company's central Florida location. His experience includes extensive traffic Registrations/licenses signal design and traffic engineering study development as well as signing and Professional engineer: pavement marking design, plus ITS planning, design, construction, operations, Florida 57712, 2001 and maintenance. Colorado 35289, 2001 1-75 Smoke and Fog Protection ITS Deployment, FDOT District Two, Utah 369569, 1999 Alachua County, FL. Project manager and engineer-of-record for this project Certifications that consisted of the design of ITS devices along the SR 93 (1-75) corridor Professional Traffic and the SR 25 (US 441) corridor in Alachua County. The project limits along Operations Engineer, 890, SR 93 (1-75) are from the Alachua/Marion County line to the Archer Road 2002 interchange, a distance of approximately 11 miles. The project limits along Advanced Maintenance of SR 25 (US 441) are from SW 109th Place to SW 63rd Avenue, a distance of approximately 2.5 miles. The work includes microwave vehicle detection Traffic (MOT) Certification, systems (MVDS), DMSs, CCTV cameras, road weather information systems FDOT, 2009, 2013 (RWIS), fiber-optic and wireless communications, and other incidental Honors and awards construction within the project limits. Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Lake Nona Boulevard at Narcoossee Road Signal, Myrtle Creek FLIGHT School Management Improvement District, Orlando, FL. As project manager and engineer- Program of-record, managed the overall project design and all other efforts on the Florida's Turnpike project to provide final constructible plans for bidding to a contractor. This Enterprise FLIGHT II School project consisted of the design of a new traffic signal at the intersection and Management Program included a mast arm signal, signing and striping, interconnect to an existing Atkins Leadership Program fiber-optic system, and coordination of utilities and a close railroad crossing for preemption. Graduate Maintenance Management and Traffic Operations Engineering Professional affiliations Management Consultant Services, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), International Bridge, Tunnel Ocoee, FL. Served as a dedicated on-site staff member to FTE through this and Turnpike Association contract for more than 9 years. Mr. Mannix started his time at FTE by managing ITE the traffic engineering group for 4 years. The group, located in Ocoee and ITSA, Florida Fort Lauderdale, is responsible for all of the existing signing and striping on the Turnpike roadway system, as well as reviewing the signing, striping, and Software maintenance-of-traffic plans for all future Turnpike construction projects. In HCS addition, this group conducts various traffic engineering studies, crash analysis, ITE Trip Generation evaluates all fatal crashes, and analyzes and responds to customer complaints relating to traffic engineering issues on Florida's Turnpike roadways. SunGuide®TMC Software Mr. Mannix has also held the ITS planning and design engineer positions for (Configuration) FTE. He was responsible for managing updates to the Turnpike's ITS business plan outlining. Mr. Mannix also managed an aggressive ITS program that included five major design-bid-build deployment projects in addition to eight design-build projects over a 5-year period. These projects deployed a 500-mile fiber-optic system, 49 mainline DMS, 41 arterial DMS, nine highway advisory radio (HAR), 548 CCTV cameras, and more than 1,300 detection devices on the Turnpike roadway system. Finally, Mr. Mannix served as traffic and ITS engineering program manager. In this role, he oversaw the traffic engineering, ITS deployment, ITS systems, and ITS maintenance sections of the Turnpike. These groups provide traffic engineering services as well as the planning, design, maintenance, and back room operations of the Turnpike's ITS devices. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 170 Education Darlene Fernandez, PE B.A., Civil Engineering, er Manaect Florida International Project 9 University, 2005 Registrations/licenses Darlene Fernandez has more than 11 years of experience in traffic operations Professional engineer: analysis, traffic modeling, access management, and traffic signalization design Florida 76507, 2013 including signing and pavement markings, transportation planning, design, Software construction management, and project management. She is proficient in Synchro 8 Synchro/SimTraffic, HCS, GIS applications, and MicroStation. HCS General Traffic Engineering Consultant, City of Miami Beach, FL. Services include conducting and reviewing traffic impact studies, DRIs, traffic circulation MicroStation and parking issues, developing conceptual improvement alternatives, and GIS designing signal plans within the city, among other services. CORSIM West Avenue PD&E Study, City of Miami Beach, FL. Served as project manager. Project included managing a PD&E study documenting the requirements for preliminary design including existing conditions, typical sections, right-of-way requirements, traffic control plans, environmental impacts, and costs improvements for a low-level bridge over the Collins Canal at West Avenue. Managed the work from the consultant, FDOT, and permitting agencies involved on this project. Traffic Engineering Consultant, City of Coral Gables, FL. Services include conducting and reviewing traffic impact studies, traffic counts, traffic calming and parking issues, safety and operational studies, plans review, design, speed surveys, and intersection delay studies within the city, among other services. Districtwide Traffic Operations Studies, FDOT District Six, Miami-Dade County, FL. As project manager/traffic operations analyst, performed advanced traffic engineering analysis using in-house resources. Analyzed traffic data using traffic models such as TEAPAC, Synchro/SimTraffic, CORSIM, and HCS. Prepared traffic engineering studies according to current practice. Performed traffic engineering analysis and prepared traffic safety and operational studies. Provided justification for traffic control devices and prepared the necessary traffic regulations. Reviewed and analyzed engineering reports prepared by consultants and other departmental units and agencies. Developed minor design projects for traffic operations. Used GIS application for traffic analysis. Krome Avenue Truck Bypass Study, FDOT District Six, Miami-Dade County, FL. Project includes preparing a study documenting the requirements for preliminary design including existing conditions, typical sections, right- of-way requirements, traffic control plans, environmental impacts, and cost improvements for the truck bypass on SR 997/Krome Avenue from Flagler Avenue to SW 316th Street. Miami-Dade Signal Retiming, Miami-Dade Signal Retiming Study, Miami-Dade County, FL. Served as project engineer. Project involved retiming several signalized intersections along three corridors in Miami-Dade County: Collins Avenue, US 1/South Dixie Highway, and NW 103rd Street. Project also consisted of developing four timing plans for the traffic control sections along the corridor. PD&E Studies, SR 968 Flagler Street and SW 1St Street from 27th Avenue to Miami River, FDOT District Six, FL. Provided project engineering services. Conducted level-of-service analysis at signalized intersections throughout the project; performed crash and safety analysis, traffic modeling, and analysis; and was responsible for the data collection efforts and field reviews within the project limits. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 171 Education Gerald Bolden, PE, PTOE B.S., Civil Engineering, jTraffic Engineer Auburn University, 1996 Projectg Registrations/licenses Professional engineer: Gerald Bolden has more than 17 years of experience in traffic engineering, Tennessee 106514, 2001 transportation planning, and functional design. His specific experience includes Alabama 24234, 2001 traffic signal design; traffic signal operations and timing; capacity analysis and Florida application in modeling using HCS, CORSIM, and Synchro; traffic impact studies; corridor process studies; ITS planning and design; roadway safety audits; interchange studies; Certifications intersection geometric designs; workzone traffic control plans; and cost Professional Traffic estimates. Operations Engineer 1180, Traffic Impact Studies,Various Developers and Agencies, Multiple 2003 Locations. Project manager and lead engineer responsible for the completion Professional affiliations of traffic impact studies in various states throughout the Southeast. The ITE studies ranged from small residential or retail developments to large mixed- use developments. Tasks included traffic data collection, trip generation, ITSA, Secretary, Tennessee capacity analyses using HCS and Synchro, traffic signal warrant analyses, and Chapter(2011-12) development of mitigation measures with engineer's opinion of probable cost. Software Broward County Convention Center Traffic Study, Broward County, HCS FL. Lead engineer responsible for the completion of the traffic study for the CORSIM existing Broward County Convention Center. Tasks included coordination of traffic data collection for 14 intersections and 16 roadway segments, traffic Synchro data adjustments, trip distribution analyses, capacity analyses using Synchro Highway Capacity Manual along SE 17th Street, and a final report. Workshop, University of Metro Top Intersections, Nashville, TN. Project manager responsible for Tennessee Transportation leading the evaluation and design for 34 intersections identified by Metro as Center, 1997 high-crash locations. This project included updating crash data, proposing Traffic Signal Workshop, safety mitigation strategies and recommended improvements, developing final Northwestern University design plans, assisting with bid packages for the improvements, and providing Traffic Institute, 1998 CEI services once projects were let to construction. National ITS Architecture, Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Continuing Traffic FHWA, ITS Software Engineering Services, Statewide, TN. Project manager/lead engineer. Acquisition, 2000 Continuing services contract with TDOT for traffic signal, roadway lighting, and Video for Traffic ITS design services. The scope of projects included traffic signal design, signal Management, Supported by phasing and timing, fiber-optic communications design, geometric design, and FHWA, 2001 interchange lighting. Traffic Simulation Using Cool Springs Area ITS Expansion, Franklin,TN. Project manager/lead CORSIM, 2002 engineer. Design of the City of Franklin ITS expansion project in the Cool Springs area. The scope included layout of more than 9.5 miles of new fiber- Planning and Functional optic conduit, interconnection of 32 signalized intersections, and 12 CCTV Design of Freeways and cameras. Interchanges, 2002 Central Business District Signal Timing and Circulation Study, City of ITS Standards Training, Franklin,TN. Project engineer. Provided traffic data collection, evaluation, FHWA and TDOT, 2003 analyses, signal timing plan development, and field implementation of multiple Roadway Paving Inspection time-of-day timing plans, along with a before and after travel time study for 14 Workshop, Metro Nashville signalized intersections within the central business district. Public Works, 2003 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 172 Education Joe Perri A.A.S., Civil Engineering, • State University of New Project Traffic Engineer York, 1990 Professional affiliations Joe Perri has 23 years of expertise in traffic engineering and ITS. He has been ITE involved with the preparation of various traffic engineering design plans Software including signalization, signing and pavement marking plans, and minor PASSER roadway design. Mr. Perri has managed several districtwide traffic operations HCS and ITS contracts for FDOT for which he assigned resources to various projects and managed project schedules. His experience in ITS includes planning, Synchro analysis, design, integration, and CEI. MicroStation Brevard County System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP), Brevard GEOPAK County, FL. Project manager responsible for the development of a SEMP for the Brevard County countywide ATMS project. CORSIM Sarasota Countywide Emergency Signal Preemption Devices Installation GuideSign Design Services, Sarasota, FL. Project manager for an on-call assignment with the Sarasota County library services contract. Atkins has been tasked with developing plans to equip an estimated 200 intersections and 86 emergency vehicles with a GPS-based emergency signal preemption system in Sarasota County. Atkins is responsible for identifying functional and operation requirements of the system. Atkins developed construction plans, signal timing modifications, specifications, and a contract booklet for a competitively bid countywide emergency signal preemption system that includes field and in- vehicle equipment. Atkins is working with FDOT District One, Sarasota County, City of Sarasota, City of Venice, City of Northport, and Sarasota County Fire Department. Orange County Phase IIB ATMS Deployment, Orange County, FL. Project manager on this federally funded design-build (D-B) project, which encompasses 40 miles of roadway along several corridors. This project, which expands the existing Orange County ATMS, includes the installation of Layer 3 master hubs, CCTV, aerial and underground fiber-optic communications, wireless communications, replacement of the intersection controllers to Ethernet-based communication controllers, extensive utility coordination, railroad permitting, and signalization reconstruction of five intersections. Work in the Orange County traffic management center (TMC) includes the installation of two new servers with TACTICS traffic control central system software and video management software and upgrades to four operator workstations within the TMC. The D-B team is responsible for the configuration of the TMC servers database and final communication connection to the core switches. 1-75 Fog and Smoke Detection System, Alachua County, FL. Served as a designer for this deployment, which included the installation of RWIS devices for fog detection, CCTV cameras, thermal imaging cameras, DMSs, travel time devices, flashing beacons, and wireless communications. The project consisted of the installation of a new 96-ct backbone along 1-75 with wireless links to DMS and CCTV devices along US 441. The project included environmental coordination, as there were wetlands and gopher tortoises within the project limits. Additional work included utility coordination, structural design, geotechnical borings and analysis, guardrail design, and power subsystem design. Coordination with the City of Gainesville was conducted for connection to their ATMS in order to provide control for this deployment. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 73 Education Patrick Nevah, PE B.S. Civil Engineering, Project Traffic Engineer University of SouthhFlorida, 2004 Registrations/licenses Patrick Nevah has 9 years of experience as lead designer, project engineer, Professional engineer: and engineer-of-record for projects including signalization and signing and Florida 72369, 2011 pavement markings, turnpike and interchange ITS, minor districtwide roadway work, and traffic engineering studies. His expertise includes the development of specifications, technical special provisions, technology review of new products, cost estimates, typical section packages, and pavement design. Yates Road at West Pipkin Road Intersection Improvements Traffic Study, Alternative Analysis and Design Services, Polk County, FL. Project engineer responsible for the design of signalization and signing and pavement marking plans for a new intersection using a diagonal strain pole signal system with presence and advance loops. Using electrical wood pole on one side due to roadway widening occurring within the next 3-5 years. Prepares plans and coordinates requirements with the maintaining agency. SR 189 (Beal Parkway), Okaloosa-Walton Transportation Planning Organization, Okaloosa County, FL. Lead engineer in producing a corridor management plan (CMP) for SR 189 (Beal Parkway). The study corridor consisted of five signalized intersections along 1.5 miles from SR 393 (Mary Esther Boulevard) to SR 188 (Racetrack Road). The CMP developed recommendations to reduce the level of service rating from an 'F' to a 'C' on a very busy commercial district. Districtwide Traffic Operations Safety Studies Consultant, FDOT District Five, FL. Project engineer for districtwide studies contract involved in qualitative assessments, left-turn phase warrants, signal warrant analysis, intersection delay studies, and crash analysis. Engineer-of-record for more than a dozen task work order studies during this contract. SR 19, FDOT District Five, Lake County, FL. Project engineer assisting in the signal warrant analysis and intersection delay study of SR 19 and CR 450 in Umatilla. Provided a report with the necessary documentation determining that a signal was not warranted at that time. While warrant 1 and warrant 2 were met, the operational and safety deficiencies observed would not be eliminated with the installation of a signal at the intersection of SR 19 and CR 450. It was determined that the operational deficiencies at the intersection were due mostly to the proximity of the Hatfield Drive intersection (less than 60 feet). To improve the operational and safety deficiencies between SR 19 and CR 450, it was recommended to provide a right-in/right-out situation for Hatfield Drive. Recommendations for improvement were developed based on field observations, traffic counts, and crash data. SR 434 at Artesia, FDOT District Five, Seminole County, FL. Project engineer assisting in the qualitative assessment and signal warrant analysis at the intersection of SR 434 and Artesia. Provided a report with the necessary documentation determining that a signal was not warranted at that time. While warrants 1 and 2 were satisfied, there were no observed operational or safety problems at the intersection. The delay for the eastbound traffic on Artesia Street was proposed to be mitigated through the installation of a right- turn lane. Recommendations for improvement were developed based on field observations, traffic counts, an intersection delay study, and crash data. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins 1 SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 74 Education Jeremy Bourdon, PE B.S., Civil Engineering, Design Engineer Michigan State University, 9 9 1996 Registration/licenses Jeremy Bourdon is the transportation manager in Atkins' Miami office. He Professional engineer: has 17 years of transportation experience and is responsible for project and Florida 59933, 2003 staff management; preparation of plans, schedules, staffhour estimates, and Certifications job budgets; performance of preliminary engineering design; oversight of Specification Package final plans and reports; and coordination of work with other engineers and Preparation (FDOT Certified) professionals. Advanced Maintenance of SR 874/Don Shula Expressway, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, Traffic (FDOT Certified) Miami-Dade County, FL. Engineer-of-record for traffic control on this widening and resurfacing project. This design-build project includes roadway and bridge widening, signing and marking, roadway milling and resurfacing, reconstruction, ITS, traffic control, drainage, lighting, utility adjustment, and public involvement. Coordination for improvements over and across CSX railroad were part of the scope of services. SR 90/Tamiami Trail from West of Loop Road to West of Everglades Preserve (9 miles), FDOT District Six, Miami-Dade County, FL. Project manager for the resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation (RRR) project located in western Miami-Dade County. The project scope includes milling and resurfacing, pavement striping, and drainage improvements. SR 5/US 1/Overseas Highway(MM47-MM48) (1 mile), FDOT District Six, Monroe County, FL. Project manager for the RRR project located in the city of Marathon. The project scope includes milling and resurfacing, pavement striping, drainage improvements, and widening for a 10-foot hurricane evacuation shoulder. SR 860/Miami Gardens Drive (2.82 miles), FDOT District Six, Miami-Dade County, FL. Engineer-of-record for traffic control for this ride-only project. The project consists of milling and resurfacing, minor widening, intersection modification, and drainage improvements that address corridor deficiencies. 1-275, Segment 2A, FDOT District Seven, Hillsborough County, FL. Assistant project manager and roadway engineer for stage three of this concrete reconstruction and repair project($110 million), which involved creating designs for the interim and ultimate configuration of 1-275 in Tampa. Coordinated the efforts of 17 consultants on stage two of the project. Coconut Creek Educational Corridor (1.5 miles), City of Coconut Creek, Broward County, FL. Project manager and engineer-of-record for this RRR project, which included milling and resurfacing, divided median construction, and pedestrian and bicycle enhancements. The project is Local Agency Program (LAP)funded and will be constructed in multiple phases. The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Broward County and involves FDOT oversight and is being designed on behalf of the City of Coconut Creek. Spencer Avenue Extension (0.15 mile), Sarasota County, FL. Project manager and engineer-of-record for this new rural alignment. Oversees the project's day-to-day operations including oversight of technical issues, plans production, adherence to schedule, QC compliance, client coordination, and all other contractual obligations. This project included right-of-way acquisition, Joint Powers Authority (JPA)water plans, and community involvement. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 175 Education Wiley Page Jr., AICP M.P.A., Public Administration, University of Senior Planner West Florida, 1997 B.S., Economics, Florida Wiley Page is the senior transportation planning group manager for Atkins' State University, 1990 Florida statewide transportation planning group. He has 23 years of experience Certifications in the area of urban and regional transportation planning. His responsibilities American Institute of include managing several general support contracts where Atkins provides Certified Planners (AICP), on-call services for clients such as FDOT, the Florida/Alabama Transportation 014162, 1998 Planning Organization (TPO), Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization affiliations (MPO), Baker County, and the City of Jacksonville Beach. He also leads Professional the development of LRTPs, DRIs, site impact studies, concurrency analysis, Southeastern thn Association transportation policy analysis, preparation and forecasting of socioeconomic oTransportation Highway y andils data, transportation modeling, production of scopes of work, preparation of technical documentation, and level-of-service analysis. Mr. Page has managed American Planning the development and implementation of numerous plans and programs Association, AICP including a study to examine the development of 75,000 acres in Bay County, Society of American Military which includes a new international airport. Engineers West Florida Regional Planning Council, General Planning Consultant, Pensacola, FL. Overall project manager for this contract, which provides staff support services to the Florida/Alabama, Okaloosa/Walton, and Bay County TPOs. Under this contract, Atkins completed updates of the 2035 LRTP for the Florida/Alabama TPO and the Okaloosa-Walton County TPO, developed updates for the US 90 and US 98 corridor master plans, updated the project priorities for all three TPOs, updated the FY14-18 transportation improvement programs for all three TPOs, performed a corridor master plan for Gulf Beach Highway, and updated the Florida/Alabama bicycle and pedestrian master plan. Atkins also developed a study to determine the feasibility of bonding selective state and federal funds to advance capacity projects in the work program. Hillsborough MPO, General Planning Consultant, Tampa, FL. Project manager for this contract, which provides support to the Hillsborough MPO. Under this contract, Atkins has completed numerous corridor studies including a multimodal of SR 60 in Brandon, Florida, and a complete streets analysis of SR 39 in Plant City, Florida. In addition, assisted MPO staff in the development of a regional public participation plan and will be developing the documentation for the 2040 LRTP update. Gainesville Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization (MTPO) 2040 LRTP Update, Gainesville, FL. Serving as project manager and will be leading the team through the process. Atkins was recently selected to complete the 2040 LRTP update by the Gainesville MTPO. LRTP Project Costing Tool, FDOT District One, Bartow, FL. Assisting in the development of a spreadsheet-based tool that will be used by MPOs in the development of their needs and cost affordable plans in the upcoming round of LRTP updates in FDOT District One. This tool allows MPOs to quickly develop detailed cost estimates for projects, funding, and programming scenarios. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins ( SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 176 Education Wiatt Bowers, AICP M.S., Urban & Regional Senior Planner Planning, Florida State University, 1996 B.A., Broadcast Journalism, Wiatt Bowers is a senior transportation and land use planner with nearly 20 Temple University, 1993 years of experience. His primary areas of expertise include corridor studies and Certifications master plans, development of LRTPs, travel demand modeling, transit planning, AICP, Florida, 013748, 1998 traffic impact studies for DRIs and other large projects, concurrency studies, Professional affiliations and mobility plans. AICP Biscayne Landing Traffic Impact Study, Oleta Partners, North Miami, FL. Urban Land Institute (ULI) Conducted traffic impact assessment for proposed mixed-use development in North Miami. The study involved analyzing a major roadway corridor American Planning for multiple phases of the project, identifying potential transportation Association, Vice Chair, First enhancements to mitigate impacts, and coordinating with public review Coast section agencies and partners. ITE Collins Street(SR 39) Complete Street Plan, Hillsborough MPO, Plant Software City, FL. This study involves developing a concept plan for the conversion of SR FSUTMS/TRANPLAN 39 from a state arterial to a local roadway in the heart of Plant City. Ideas being developed include removing travel lanes, adding on-street parking, enhancing Cube Voyager bicycle facilities, and developing a cohesive landscape/streetscape plan for the HCS 2-mile corridor. Synchro Clay Transit Vision, North Florida TPO, Clay County, FL. Project manager on study to identify short- and long-range enhancements to transit services in GIS software Clay County. The effort included outreach to stakeholders, on-board surveys, Professional development analysis of possible funding sources, and prioritization of improvement projects. Mr. Bowers has participated Multimodal Transportation Concurrency Manual, City of Temple in several FDOT DRI Terrace, FL. Project manager for the development of a concurrency ordinance modeling workshops as a and manual to implement a multimodal transportation district (MMTD) guest instructor. encompassing the entire city. The project also involved coordination with FDOT and Florida Department of Community Affairs on implementation of the MMTD. Blanding Boulevard Corridor Master Plan, North Florida TPO, Clay County, FL. Project manager on study, which examined roadway capacity and safety issues. Developed short-, mid-, and long-term recommendations to enhance mobility and connectivity in the area and identified opportunities for redevelopment/placemaking. Parking Garage Traffic Impact and Circulation Study, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Project manager on a traffic impact study for a proposed parking garage on campus. The study involved collecting existing data, developing future traffic, and analyzing circulation for two potential sites. Additional services included developing conceptual layouts and cost estimates for each site. The project also involved developing concepts and renderings for potential modifications to the Archer Road corridor through the campus. Tampa Bay Intermodal Centers Study, FDOT District Seven, FL. Assisted in the evaluation of regional travel demand patterns and the identification of potential intermodal sites in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. The study also involved development of project traffic at the preferred locations and participation in public hearings, workshops, and agency coordination. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 77 2.3 Financial capacity As per the RFQ, we requested that Dun & Bradstreet submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) directly to Ms. Sandra M. Rico. We have included our receipt for this request on the following page. 111611 . • 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 78 Order Summary Page 1 of 1 Help I Home • Dun & Bradstreet Government Solutions D&B Contractor Management Portal Decide with Confidence Mir I Step 3 of 3 View Registration Status 1 Find Your Company D&B Supplier Certification Receipt 2 Provide Payment Date Time Company D-U-N-S Product Cost Information 03- 14:26:29 ATKINS 050439223 Supplier Sub $91.95 25- NORTH Portal Total 3 View Registration Status 2014 AMERICA, Registration INC. Product- Yearly Tax $0.00 Total Cost $91.95 For further information or clarification Please contact our Customer Resource Group by clicking on the Customer Support link at the bottom of the page. Print Back To progress through the portal, Powered By® Customer Support Privacy Policy Help use the available navigation buttons.Do not use the back or forward buttons on your browser window https://suppli erportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SpRegistrationReceiptV iew?lang... 3/25/2014 0001.039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Tab 3: Scope of services proposed w a0 0 tD aN DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 179 3. Scope of services proposed A clear understanding of the project requirements and our previous experience on similar projects has enabled Atkins to assemble a team tailored to tackle any challenges. Atkins is currently working with the Figure 2. QC process Step 5 City under a similar contract and has demonstrated its commitment to the City Step 4 Verify in providing efficient, quality, and timely corrections services that exceed the City's expectations. Step 3 Incorporate QCR Atkins has delivered each assignment on Resolve corrections time and within budget and has provided comments Linatorl IP support to City staff as requested in meetings Step 2 LTP-QCR LTP and presentations to the City Commission, StepReview 1 Planning Board, and other stakeholders. (identify This experience demonstrates our approach Prepare corrections) to providing services to the City on this for review QCR contract as well. Our designated project LTP manager, Darlene Fernandez, PE, will Lead technical professional (LTP) • QC reviewer(QCR) continue to serve the City on this contract. She is supported by the key staff indicated in Figure 1 as well as a large pool of Management philosophy engineering, technical, and administrative personnel With Atkins' management philosophy, our clients and resources. enjoy a close working relationship with our firm. This As a hands-on project manager, Ms. Fernandez approach ensures that the project will be executed will not only assign the responsibility to the key in accordance with the client's goals and that the staff in charge of the appropriate assignment but resulting products will be delivered on time, within will also work with them to ensure that adequate budget, and in the best form for the client's use. quality resources are dedicated to the production Atkins prides itself on a reputable record of timely and completion of the assignment and that the completion of studies, design, and construction work will be accomplished within the agreed-upon services. This is the result of effective project schedule. Additionally, it is the responsibility of the management based on three key principles: project manager to ensure that each assignment is •Understanding the client's goals and mutually quality controlled/peer reviewed by senior technical agreeing on ways to meet them. staff. Our assigned QA/QC officer Paul Mannix, PE, PTOE, will follow the formal five-step Atkins QC •Team coordination achieved by assigning process shown in Figure 2. Once the five-step QC hands-on management responsibility for each process is followed on each document generated, project to a departmental project director and/ this process and the documentation are further or project manager of the firm, or in the case of reviewed and checked off by Mr. Mannix. larger projects, to two or more senior-level staff. Atkins has successfully conducted several similar This process facilitates proper communication projects for municipalities including the City of Miami flow, whether formal or informal, through regular Beach, City of Coral Gables, City of Miami, City of meetings with the client and project team. The client will also maintain communication with the in Fort Lauderdale, Miami-Dade Public Schools, and house project team through regular meetings and Broward County. Atkins has also worked directly Periodic progress reports. with FDOT on several districtwide projects including traffic engineering services, access management •Accountability resting on the assumption that the studies, and safety reviews and recommendations client is an integral part of the project team and, in studies. We are thoroughly familiar with FDOT's fact, its most important member. The client plays a requirements, standards, and expectations. vital part in the success of the project by meeting frequently with the project team and by supplying information and direction, as required. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 180 Atkins professionals understand the importance of providing consulting services on time and within established budgets. Atkins' management strategy Our team offers an organization that will be based upon a simple, but important, premise. is flexible and responsive to the City's Specifically, each segment of a project must be needs. organized, directed, and controlled to ensure its timely completion within the allowable budget. Atkins fully understands that this requirement is based upon real-world conditions and that any One of the major attributes of our team is the fact other outcome would result in administrative and that we have successfully performed consulting budgetary hardships. services for the City in the past. Equally important Projects will be managed closely and coordinated is the fact that our team has successfully worked with the staff throughout the course of each project. together on previous projects. The benefit to Atkins will respond quickly and efficiently to needs, the City is that there will be no learning curve questions, and review comments and incorporate for our proposed project team on this project. any necessary changes. Because of our team's experience working with city governments and the quality of the proposed Implementation plan Atkins team, we have every reason to expect that Our team offers an organization that is flexible and our relationship with the City will be successful and responsive to the City's needs and is experienced mutually rewarding. in extensive and complex management and We envision our role very clearly—we will continue construction programs. Assembling a team to be an extension of the City's staff, working of professionals with ever-changing specialty as a single entity to accomplish common goals. requirements is a signature of our proposed project With this concept in mind, we will continue to manager, Ms. Fernandez. She has the full resources familiarize ourselves with your existing personnel of the team's multidisciplinary staff available to her and operations and procedures in order to develop for these projects. appropriate "links" for each assignment. Our goal is The team proposes the following management to develop a system that will allow our team to blend control tools: seamlessly with the City's operations. •Written authorizations that initiate and control QA/QC - testing and risk active work. mitigation •Daily tracking and analysis of labor hours Atkins is sensitive to the need to accurately plan expended. and budget for the scope of services. This goal will •A project coordination meeting, wherein attention be achieved through the use of Atkins' in-house is focused on significant and critical issues and on QC program designed to accomplish two major those staff managers assigned responsibility for objectives: resolving them. •Provide senior-level technical guidance throughout •Incremental work scopes, schedules, and budgets, the project each discretely assigned to a specific unit. •Eliminate redundant work and miscommunicated •Effective management action to bring attention efforts to a work task or decision that is at odds with the work plan or schedule, i.e., "workaround" program Our approach to these objectives is based upon the and risk management assessment. following procedures: Our project manager will control technical work •A QA team will provide guidance and independent being performed, while the City monitors and review of all work. At the early stages of each reviews in-progress and completed work. project phase, the QA team will be asked to The most important key to success will be an comment on the proposed tasks before work excellent working relationship between the City begins. This will prevent misdirected efforts. and the Atkins team. We must be candid with each •Following the completion of each major work other about work progress including technical, cost, segment, the QA team will review draft materials and schedule issues. We expect and will encourage before final production. a cooperative, ongoing, and close-sharing of •The project manager will have a complete information between City staff and the Atkins team. understanding of the project and will have the The basic premise of our management philosophy is authority to control technical production activities. that there will be no surprises. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 81 •The best-suited staff will be assigned to the Scope of services requirements specific tasks, and as few personnel as possible will be used. This will minimize the opportunity Atkins reviewed the scope of services in detail and for miscommunication as well as redundant and summarized below how we will achieve each portion inefficient work. of the scope for Project Types A and B. We have also included other considerations not included as part of •All work transmitted between technical participants the scope requirements. In addition, we addressed and the client will go through the project manager. compliance with the minimum requirements in •The project manager will conduct frequent, if not Tab 1. Since we have worked on many similar daily, discussions with technical leaders to assess projects with the City, we understand the challenges the project status and maintain direct control over and other factors that have to be reviewed and taken work priorities. into consideration when conducting a traffic impact Project timeline and phasing study review. options Project type A For the scope of services, the City specified that the Review of traffic impact studies by land project timeline will not exceed 5 working days. developers for proposed projects Typically, the Planning Board has a tight schedule, The City will receive a traffic impact study from and meeting agendas have to be printed at least a week in advance, and staff needs to prepare a report a land developer for review once the City has internally prior to agenda review. To accomplish that made this a requirement as part of their submittal goal, we have provided a sample project timeline and for a permit with the Planning Department. This phasing option for Project Types A and B: includes new developments and redevelopments of properties. Once the City receives the traffic impact •Day 1: Atkins will conduct site visit and begin study, they will forward it to the traffic engineering report review. consultant for a peer review. •Day 2: Atkins will finalize report review to include items as specified by the City. Provide prompt input to Planning •Day 3: Atkins will submit the draft memo to the Department staff on the accuracy of the City. The City will forward comments to the traffic information provided in the traffic report engineering consultant to respond to comments The City will expect a quick turnaround on each peer and make edits, as necessary. review. The expected response time will be within 5 •Day 4: Atkins will set up a conference call with the working days after receiving the traffic study. Atkins traffic engineering consultant and City to discuss has the expertise and availability to accommodate any comments that they may not agree with or the City in the time period required for peer review. need further clarification. This will avoid multiple We understand that due to the tight schedule for back-and-forth with the City and consultant and submittals to the Planning Board, it is very important save time. The traffic engineering consultant will to meet this requirement. This time frame will also respond to comments and send to Atkins for final include reviews with the traffic engineer and the review. implementation of comments, if needed. A site •Day 5: Atkins will send the final memo to the City visit will also be conducted prior to the traffic study for final approval. review. Atkins proposes phasing options to ensure that the Determine the impacts based on trip tasks will be completed within the timeline. The generation initial report review and site visit will occur in two Atkins staff will review the ITE trip generation different phases but on the same day. Depending manual for the type of land use and size that is being on the type of review, if an AutoTURN analysis is used for a particular project. Atkins will check that needed, the AutoTURN file will also be forwarded the appropriate assumptions were made for the land to our civil group on the first day. QA/QC will occur use and whether the traffic engineer used a fitted on Day 2 prior to sending out the draft memo curve equation (if applicable) or the average rate for to the City on Day 3. On Day 2, if Atkins finds a the calculation of additional trips for the a.m. and conflict with the proposed recommendations and p.m. peak periods. alternatives, we will notify the City immediately to discuss right away. On Day 4, while the traffic Validate/assess travel demand growth engineering consultant is finalizing comments, Atkins will begin working on the final memo to be ready to To assess the growth rate in a particular area, we will submit to the City on Day 5. need to gather available historical data around the 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 182 area and review the LRTPs, which include all future projects. We will request any data the City may have We envision our role very clearly—we from past projects for traffic counts near the site as will continue to be an extension of the well as a review of the Florida traffic information CD produced by FDOT, which has historical data City's staff, working as a single entity to for specific sites throughout Miami-Dade County, accomplish common goals. and compare the years. Traffic volume comparison from the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) and the Southeast Florida Conduct a field visit Regional Planning Model (SERPM) should also be Field visits are very important for the review of any checked to determine the appropriate growth factor. traffic study. It is important for us to understand Validate traffic data collection the way the area operates and note any conflicts that may be an impact to traffic. The field review We will review all traffic data collected in the traffic will also help to assess the microsimulation files that study. We will check for the dates in which the are submitted to confirm that they show real-time traffic data was produced and verify that it was not operating conditions. The date and time of the visit done on non-school days. Typically, traffic counts will be noted as part of the technical memo sent to should be collected Tuesday through Thursday. the City for review. However, there are times depending on the type of development that the counts should be collected on Review study findings and a weekend. For example, a hotel or bank may have recommendations more traffic demand on a Friday than a Tuesday. The The study findings and recommendation will be traffic counts should also have the FDOT peak season reviewed. All recommendations have to be feasible conversion factor applied to all traffic data. The peak and meet the City's standards. period that was used needs to be confirmed with the traffic data. Prepare a memorandum with comments Validate microsimulation runs Immediately following the review, a technical The City will receive the raw files from the traffic memorandum will be prepared to the City for engineering consultant for the microsimulation that submittal to the traffic engineering consultant. was done for the study. The files can be in Synchro The draft memorandum will be completed within or HCS 2010 format. We will check that the models 3 days of receiving the study to ensure the traffic were calibrated with real field conditions and that engineering consultant has time to review and the data was properly inputted into the model. respond to comments prior to the 5-day time period. Validate queue analysis for intersections Participate and attend meetings including and driveways the Planning Board meeting and meeting with City staff Depending on the amount of new trips based on the trip generation model, a queuing analysis will Atkins has prior experience working with the be reviewed to make sure that it does not block any Planning Board. We will be ready to answer driveways or parking spaces within the property. If questions regarding the traffic study produced by an operational analysis is conducted as part of the the traffic engineering consultant. We will also be study, the intersection queue is already calculated as available at any time to have a conference call with part of the Synchro reports. the City to discuss comments or questions regarding the study. Validate proposed roadway improvements to mitigate possible traffic impacts Review of on-site and off-site vehicular circulation All alternatives proposed by the traffic engineering consultant will be reviewed for safety and The vehicular circulation has to be reviewed to operational conflicts. Atkins will confirm that the determine how vehicles will ingress and egress the increase in traffic due to a proposed development project site. This is important for the determination or redevelopment will not increase the traffic of any impacts at the intersections due to the significantly or have any major impacts at nearby increase in traffic. The on-site circulation has to be intersections. All traffic should be addressed reviewed for the need of traffic signage and striping internally within the property including traffic to avoid driver confusion and any conflicts with circulation and parking. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 83 parking. The off-site circulation will be reviewed conduct this type of analysis and provide feedback to ensure there are no significant impacts to on the impacts, if any, of vehicles and trucks. neighboring intersections. Project type B Review transportation demand 1 yP management (TDM) plan Review of geometric and operational The City has expressed its desire to have this included analysis of all options/alternatives proposed as part of the analysis of the traffic impact study peer reviews. There are many new developments Atkins will review the operational analysis completed in the City, and they want to ensure that they are by the traffic engineer. There should be existing meeting the TDM's goals. TDM is a general term for conditions, future conditions without project, strategies that increase the overall transportation and future conditions with project analyzed for system efficiency by encouraging a shift from single all intersections that will be affected by the traffic vehicles to more transit, shifting vehicles out of peak circulation of the proposed development. periods, bicycle, and pedestrian use. This supports Assessment of valet parking operation the urban mobility plan focus on moving goods based on mechanical parking and rather than motor vehicles. The ultimate goal of automated parking systems the TDM is to reduce auto trips by increasing travel options by providing information to encourage and Some traffic studies require a valet operations help individuals modify their travel behavior or by analysis for self-parking or mechanical parking. reducing the physical need. For example, providing We will review the methodology from ITE's pedestrian access and bicycle racks encourage people Transportation and Land Development manual. The to use other forms of transportation other than a queues will be reviewed to make sure that there are vehicle. no impacts within the property or spillback into any Other considerations major road. The traffic engineering consultant will have to recommend the number of employees used Based on past experience, there are other as valet operators based on the analysis. considerations that need to be reviewed and addressed that were not specified in the scope Consider additional feasible alternatives not requirements for a complete peer review of a traffic included in the study study. Atkins will assess the recommendations provided •Committed developments. Committed by the traffic engineering consultant. However, developments should be addressed in all reports we will also consider other possible alternatives to determine whether any neighboring properties that may be less of an impact to the network and have a committed development that would impact nearby driveways. One example is the site circulation future traffic patterns. proposed by a developer. At times, changing the •Loading zones, delivery trucks, and trash traffic circulation proposed by the developer will help pickups. From past experience, this has always with the operation of the driveways and intersections been something the Planning Department would and avoid safety and operational conflicts. like to accommodate, if possible. They want to Review of self-parking and/or valet parking ensure that delivery trucks and waste pick-up has a assumptions way to access the property without impacting any major roadways. Loading zones are preferred to Based on the queuing analysis, we will determine be accommodated onsite, but there are challenges whether the total number of valet operators is accomplishing this with limited space and causing sufficient for the queue of that development. Self- any loss in parking. parking will be evaluated to determine whether there •Trip distribution and traffic assignments. will be any negative impact on the time it takes for Trip distribution and traffic assignments have to someone to find parking and not impact the queue. be evaluated for most traffic studies. This can Run AutoTURN templates be accomplished by the origin and destination of turning movement counts collected at study The City will submit to Atkins the AutoCAD file for intersections or by using the Miami-Dade County the review of an AutoTURN analysis to confirm that cardinal distribution. The percentages will then be vehicles and trucks have sufficient turning radii to calculated for each movement, and the increase enter and exit the property without any impacts to in traffic will be projected for the neighboring parking or through vehicles on major roadways. intersections and project driveways. Atkins has a large civil group that is available to 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DowSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 84 •Access management. All sites will be reviewed for access management standards conformance. Recommendations will be made as part of the Atkins prides itself on a reputable record alternative to help achieve compliance within the of timely completion of studies, design, standards. and construction services. •Constructability/feasibility issues. All alternatives will be reviewed for any constructability issues. We will verify that none of the recommendations proposed by the developer has •Coordination with FDOT and the County. From any right-of-way conflicts and/or constructability past experience, there have been many times when issues. a development is within an FDOT or County road. •Sight distance evaluation. A sight distance There will be times coordination will take place evaluation should be considered for all driveways with both agencies when there are alternatives that and intersections for the development. We will impact their roads. Coordination is important in ensure that they meet FDOT's design standards order to avoid any surprises later in the process and based on the design speed of the roadway and not be able to implement a recommendation or number of lanes. alternative as noted in the traffic study. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-882862A08CDA Appendix co co X DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 85 Appendix Atkins is committed to providing comprehensive services that will help the City meet its goals. RFQ exceptions Atkins respectfully requests that the City considers the modifications to the RFQ on page 86. Insurance Please see attached insurance certificate on pages 87-94. I yi 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 186 See Fla. Stat. §§725.06 and 725.08 which states design consultants and professionals are only required to indemnify a public agency "to the extent"of its negligent act,error,etc. 26. ASSIGNMENT. The successfu proposer shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract, including any or all of its right, title or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any person,company or corporati'in,without the prior written consent of the City. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND R•GULATIONS. The proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, and inspection fees required to co •fete the work and shall comply with all applicable laws. 28.OPTIONAL CONTRACT SAGE.When the successful proposer(s)is in agreement,other units of government or non-profit agencies may el rticipate in purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of government or non-profit a••ncy. 29.VOLUME OF WORK 0 BE RECEIVED BY CONTRACTOR. It is the intent of the City to purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation from the contractor. However, the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from state or other governmental contract, or on an as-needed basis through the City's spot arket purchase provisions. Insert:to the proximate extent such is caused by the negligent act,error,or omission of contractor in 30. DISPUTES. In th, event of a conflict between the do uments,the order of priority of the documents shall be as follows: Insert:reasonable A. Any contra. or agreement resulting from the aw rd of this solicitation;then B. Addendu issued for this solicitation,with the I test Addendum taking preceden then C. The solici .tion;then D. The pros►ser's proposal in response to the s icitation. 31. INDEMNIFICATION. The contractor shall inde nify and hold harmless the Ci and its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities from any and all liabil ty, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, which the City or its officers, employee , agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of daims, demands,suits,causes of actions or proceedings : :• ' : : -: • - : ' ' : :• : , - : ' : : : - • '-: :-- the performance of the agreement by the contractor or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors. -- -- -- - -- -- - - -- --- - - ----'-- -- . . . . .. : .-• •-- , . .•: -- -• . . - -- . . The contractor expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by the contractor shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify,keep and save harmless end-defend the City or its officers, employees, agents and instrumentalities as herein provided.The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 32. CONTRACT EXTENSION. The City reserves the right to require the Contractor to extend contract past the stated termination date for a period of up to 120 days in the event that a subsequent contract has not yet been awarded.Additional extensions past the 120 days may occur as needed by the City and as mutually agreed upon by the City and the contractor. 33. FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW. Proposals are hereby notified that all Bid including,without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes,and s.24(a),Art. 1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty (30) days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Contractor agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to(a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b)provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in RFQ 2014-116-SR 9 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 187 ACRO® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE Page 1 of 2 04/TE 03/2' THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAMF Millis of New York, Inc. PHONE FAX c/o 26 Century Blvd. A/C NO FXTI 877-945-7378 (A/C Nor 888-467-2378 P. 0. Box 305191 A ORFSS certificatesOwillis.com Nashville, TN 37230-5191 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAICN _INSURERA:Greenwich Insurance Company 22322-001 INSURED INSURER B.American Guarantee a Liability Insurance 26247-001 Atkins North America, Inc. 2001 NM 107th Avenue INSURER C:Underwriter'a at Lloyds 15792-001 Miami, FL 33172-2507 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F'. COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:21465341 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT VITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN.THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POUCIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. OMR ADD%SUBP. POLICY EFF POUCYEXP ITR TYPE OF INSURANCE NBRf1 NNn POLICY NUMBER 4,mainIVY Y1 LIMITS A GENERALLIABILITY Y CGG740901603 4/1/2014 4/1/2015 EACHOCCURRENCEGE $ 1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABILRY DAMAGET(EaoxTurcncel S 300,000 PREMISES CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) E 10,000 X Contractual Liability PERSONAL BADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE S 2.000.000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG f 2,000,000 POUCY X I JF 0. n LOC S A AUTOMOBILEUABIUTY 1 b' CAH740901703 4/1/2014 4/1/2015 Oa BNEDINGLE LIMIT $ 2,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) S X ALLOWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) X HIRED SU TOS AUTOS X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTOS (Per*cadent) S B R UMBRELLA use X OCCUR AUC924234902 4/1/2014 4/1/2015 EACH OCCURRENCE S 1.000.000 EXCESS UAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE S 1.000.000 DED I (RETENTIONS S A WORKERS COMPENSATION CWG740901503 4/1/2014 4/1/2015 E I vucsrAT(i I IDTH- ANDEMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ,1� TORYIIMRft FR ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Yrr� N/A _E.L EACH ACCIDENT S 1,000,000_ _ OFFICER/MEMBER� EXCLUDED, IN.ndsesaibeonder E.L DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE S 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT S 1,000,000 C Professional B080111209P14 4/1/2014 4/1/2015 $1,000,000 Bach Claim & Liability-Claims Made $1,000,000 Annual Aggregate 11/11/1961 Retrodate DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(Attach Acord 101,Additonel Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) Greenwich Insurance Companies Beet Rating A XV American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company Best Rating A+ XV Underwriters at Lloyd's London AM Best Rating: A XV. Professional Liability policy written on claims-made basis. There are no Deductibles or Self-Insured Retentions on the General Liability, Automobile Liability. Workers Compensation and Umbrella coverages. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. City of Miami Beach AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE City Manager's Office 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, FL 33139 Co11:4379520 Tp1:1788122 Cert:21465341 IJ1988-2010ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 0001.039184.0414 IIPF Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 88 AGENCY CUSTOMERID: 33004588 LOC#: �� ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Paged of_2_ AGENCY NAMED INSURED Atkins North America, Inc. Willis of New York, Inc. 2001 NW 107th Avenue POLICY NUMBER Miami, FL 33172-2507 See First Page CARRIER NAIC CODE See First Page EFFECTIVE DATE: See First Page ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM ISA SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: 25 FORM TITLE: CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES SOLICITATION No. 2014-116-SR The City of Miami Beach, Florida is included as an Additional Insured as respects to General Liability. ACORD 101(2008101) Co11:4379520 Tp1:1788122 Cert:21465341 ©2008ACORDCORPORATION.Allrightsreserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4F D5-B 1 C 1-B82862A08C DA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 189 POLICY NUMBER: CGG740901603 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s): Location(s)Of Covered Operations ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHOM YOU VARIOUS AS REQUIRED PER WRITTEN HAVE AGREED,THROUGH WRITTEN CONTRACT, CONTRACT. AGREEMENT OR PERMIT, EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE LOSS,TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above,will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these include as an additional insured the person(s) or additional insureds, the following additional exclu- organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only sions apply: with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury' or damage" or "personal and advertising injury' "property damage"occurring after. caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 1. All work, including materials, parts or equip- ment furnished in connection with such work, 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your on the project (other than service, maintenance behalf; or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location of the the additional insured(s) at the location(s) desig- covered operations has been completed,or nated above. 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its in- tended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor en- gaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. V Q CG 20 10 07 04 ©ISO Properties, Inc., 2004 Page 1 of 1 0 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 190 POLICY NUMBER:CGG740901603 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 2037 07 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED-OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS- COMPLETED OPERATIONS This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s}: Location And Description Of Completed Operations ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHOM VARIOUS AS REQUIRED PER WRITTEN YOU HAVE AGREED,THROUGH WRITTEN CONTRACT. CONTRACT, AGREEMENT OR PERMIT, EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE LOSS,TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE. Information required to complete this Schedule,if not shown above,will be shown in the Declarations. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for"bodily injury"or"property dam- age" caused, in whole or in part, by "your work" at the location designated and described in the sche- dule of this endorsement performed for that addi- tional insured and included in the "products- completed operations hazard". CG 20 37 07 04 ©ISO Properties,Inc., 2004 Page 1 of 1 D 0001.039184.0414 AtKins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 1 91 POLICY NUMBER:CGG740901603 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 02 2410 93 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EARLIER NOTICE OF CANCELLATION PROVIDED BY US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: . COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Number of Days'Notice 90 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this Schedule will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) For any statutorily permitted reason other than Policy Condition or as amended by an applicable nonpayment of premium, the number of days state cancellation endorsement, is increased to the required for notice of cancellation, as provided in number of days shown in the Schedule above. paragraph 2. of either the CANCELLATION Common CG022410 93 Copyright,Insurance Services Office, Inc.,1992 0001.039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 192 POLICY NUMBER:CAH740901703 XIC4051007 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. CANCELLATION BY US This endorsement modifies insurance provided u.nder the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM BUSINESS AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by the endorsement. Changes In Conditions The number of days required for notice of cancellation by us for any reason other than nonpayment of premium, as provided in either paragraph 2. of the CANCELLATION Common Policy condition or as amended by an applicable state cancellation endorsement, is extended to the number of days shown in the Schedule below: SCHEDULE Number of Days' Notice:90 All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged. (/ (Authorized Representative) XIC 405 1007 s 2007, XL America, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Office, Inc.,with its pennission. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR: Traffic Engineering Consulting Services 193 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY we 99 0110 (Ed.1/08) THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICy_ PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EARLIER NOTICE OF CANCELLATION PROVIDED BY US ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: WORKERS'COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY Number of Days Notice:90 (If no entry appears above,information required to complete this Schedule will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement) For any statutorily permitted reason other than nonpayment of premium, the number of days required for notice of cancellation, as provided in PART SIX '"" CONDITIONS, D. Cancelation of the Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Insurance Policy or as amended by an applicable state cancellation endorsement,is increased to the number of days shown in the Schedule above. All other terms and conditions remain the same. This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. (The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective April 1,2014 Policy No.CWG740901503 Endorsement No. Insured ATKINS US HOLDINGS INC. Insurance CompanyGreenwich Insurance Compptersignedby we 99 0110 Ed. 1/08 ©2007 XL America,Inc. 0001.039184.0414 Atkins SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RFQ 2014-116-SR:Traffic Engineering Consulting Services I 94 Willis Limited FINEX Global WIIIIS CONTRACT ENDORSEMENT INSURED: WS Atkins Plc and as more fully defined in the contract PERIOD: 1 Apri12014to 31 March 2015 TYPE: Insurance of UK PI Generic Primary UNIQUE MARKET REFERENCE: B080111209P14 ENDORSEMENT REFERENCE: 0002 EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 Apri12014 local standard time at the address of the Insured. It is hereby noted and agreed that with effect from the effective date above the following General Condition is added to the policy: "If INSURERS cancel this policy prior to its expiry date by notice to the INSURED for any reason,INSURERS will send written notice of cancellation to the persons or organizations listed in the schedule to becreated and maintained by the INSURED (the "Cancellation Notice Schedule")at least 30 days prior to the cancellation date applicable to the policy. This notice will be in addition to any notice to the INSURED. The INSURED will provide an updated copy of the Cancellation Notice Schedule to Insurers on a monthly basis. The notice referenced in this endorsement is intended only to be a courtesy notification to the person(s) or organization(s) named in the Cancellation Notice Schedule in the event of a pending cancellation of coverage. INSURERS have no legal obligation of any kind to any such person(s) or organization(s). Any failure to provide advance notice of cancellation to the person(s) or organization(s)named in the Cancellation Notice Schedule will impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon INSURERS,will not extend any policy cancellation date and will not negate any cancellation of the policy. INSURERS are not responsible for verifying any information in any Cancellation Notice Schedule, nor are INSURERS responsible for any incorrect information that the INSURED may use." All other terms and conditions remain unaltered. Willis Limited WUv1081!l Willis Internal Rei 0002 ,T,(k• 0001.039184.0414 Atkins I SOQ for the City of Miami Beach, Florida DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA CITY OF MIAMI BEACH TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES SOLICITATION # 2014-116-SR APRIL 3rd, 2014 immoimmimmosimw Numummimmir SUBMITTED BY: FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 8750 NW 36th STREET SUITE 670 MIAMI, FL 33178 COPY "-FIE "ENGINEERING FOGram" DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS Solicitation 4:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services TAB 1. COVER LETTER & MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Page 1.1 COVER LETTER 1 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE, &AFFIDAVIT 2 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS 9 TAB 2. EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATION 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM 15 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM 18 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY 31 TAB 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES PROPOSED 32 Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach SR 1.1 COVER LETTER Solicitationing Consulting2nServices Traffic Engineering Services CONTACT NAME AND ADDRESS April 4, 2014 RESPONSIBLE OFFICE: City of Miami Beach Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. (FTE) Department of Procurement Management 1700 Convention Center Drive 8750 NW 36th Street, Suite 670 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Miami, FL 33178 Ph: (305) 463-8411 Evaluation Committee, Fax: (305 -8744 Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. (FTE) is AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV"' pleased to submit this Request for Qualifica- Oliver Rodrigues, PE, PTOE tions packet to provide Traffic Engineering ser- Senior Vice President vices as described in the scope of services. FTE Phone (305) 463-8411 Ext. 102 has put together a project team of personnel Email: oliver@fteinc.net with exceptional levels of expertise. FTE is a certified DBE firm with the Florida De- partment of Transportation (FDOT) and a certi- fied MBE firm with the Florida Department of Management Services. FTE is approved and certified to provide professional engineering services since 1990. In addition, the firm is prequalified with FDOT and Miami Dade County to provide traffic engineering services. The proposal was prepared in accordance with the evaluation criteria and demonstrate the follow- ing reasons for selecting FTE. • FTE qualifications including ability of firm's professional personnel to perform services • Extensive experience with traffic engineering • Understanding of the scope of work for the planning department •Willingness to meet any minority business enterprise procurement goals, if any are set •Commitment to perform the work • Experience with various municipalities •Availability of staff We are excited about the opportunity to serve the City of Miami Beach. Sincerely, diver rtuur agues, rr=, r I l./r= Senior Vice President Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 1 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.2 RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE, &AFFIDAVIT Solicitation It:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services RESPONSE CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE, & AFFIDAVIT Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) �,M„J Page 2 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: Sandra M.Rico 305.673.7000 x 6230 srico@miamibeachfl.gov STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION, QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT Purpose: The purpose of this Response Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposals of certain solicitation and contractual requirements, and to collect necessary information from Proposals in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated. This Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. 1. General Proposer Information. FIRM NAME: Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. (FTE) No of Years in Business: 25 No of Years in Business Locally: 10 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): 8250 Pascal Drive CITY: Punta Gorda STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33950 TELEPHONE NO.: 941-369-2818 TOLL FREE NO.: 1-800-639-4851 FAX NO.: 941-639-4851 FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: 8750 NW 36th Street, Suite 670 CITY: Miami STATE: Florida ZIP CODE: 33178 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: Oliver Rodrigues, PE, PTOE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: 305-463-8411 x 102 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: 1-800-639-4851 X 102 ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: oliver@fteinc.net FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: 65-0183924 The City reserves the right to seek additional information from proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals, client information,financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A-Page 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 1.Miami Beach Based(Local)Vendor.Is proposer claiming Miami Beach based firm status? YES x NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming Miami Beach vendor status shall submit a Business Tax Receipt issued by the City of Miami Beach and the proof of residency requirement, as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3747, to demonstrate that the Proposer is a Miami Beach Based Vendor. 2.Veteran Owned Business.Is proposer claiming a veteran owned business status? YES x NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government, as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 3. Conflict Of Interest. All Proposals must disclose, in their Statement of Qualifications, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member(spouse, parent, sibling, and child) who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposals must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposals must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposals must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates FTE does not have any conflict of interest. 4.References&Past Performance.Proposer shall submit at least three(3)references for whom the proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:For each reference submitted,the following information is required: 1)Firm Name,2)Contact Individual Name &Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. Firm Name:City of Miami Beach Contact Individual Name&Title:Xavier Falconi,PE,Project Manager Address:Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,FL 33139 Telephone:(305)673-7000 x 6129 Contact's Email:XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Narrative on Scope of Services Provided:Peer reviewed traffic impact studies for various applications within the City of Miami Beach. Firm Name:City of Coconut Creek Contact Individual Name&Title:Osama Elshami,PE,Director Address:4800 West Copans Road,Coconut Creek,FL 33063 Telephone:(954)973-6786 Contact's Email:OElshami@coconutcreek.net Narrative on Scope of Services Provided: Performed traffic calming improvements for NW 42 Avenue, City of Coconut Creek. Peer reviewed traffic impact study of Seminole Casino,City of Coconut Creek. Firm Name:City of North Port Contact Individual Name&Title:Benjamin E.Newman,PE,Project Manager Address:4970 City Hall Blvd,North Port,FL 34286 Telephone:(941)429-7086 Contact's Email:bnewman@cityofnorthport.com Narrative on Scope of Services Provided: Performed transportation impact analysis reviews of proposed developments in the City of North Port. 5. Suspension, Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has proposer ever been debarred, suspended or other legal violation, or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by any public sector agency? YES x NO Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A—Pape DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is"YES,"Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 6. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposals are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposals shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including disqualification of their Statement of Qualifications,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation. For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly, of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. FTE or any of its employees have not contributed to any candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 7. Code of Business Ethics.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Division with its proposal/response or within five(5)days upon receipt of request.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Proposer,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among others,the conflict of interest,lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall submit firm's Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt, as required in the ordinance, the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. FTE will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 8.Living Wage.Pursuant to Section 2-408 of the Miami Beach City Code,as same may be amended from time to time,Proposer shall be required to pay all employees who provide services pursuant to this Agreement,the hourly living wage rates listed below: Commencing with City fiscal year 2012-13(October 1,2012),the hourly living rate will be$11.28/hr with health benefits,and$12.92/hr without benefits. The living wage rate and health care benefits rate may, by Resolution of the City Commission be indexed annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, issued by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent (3%). The City may also, by resolution, elect not to index the living wage rate in any particular year,if it determines it would not be fiscally sound to implement same(in a particular year). Proposals'failure to comply with this provision shall be deemed a material breach under this proposal, under which the City may, at its sole option, immediately deem said proposer as non-responsive,and may further subject proposer to additional penalties and fines,as provided in the City's Living Wage Ordinance, as amended. Further information on the Living Wage requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document, Proposer agrees to the living wage requirement. 9.Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and Employees with Domestic Partners.When awarding competitively solicited contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more calendar work weeks, the Equal Benefits for Domestic Partners Ordinance 2005-3494 requires certain contractors doing business with the City of Miami Beach,who are awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide "Equal Benefits" to their employees with domestic partners, as they provide to employees with spouses.The Ordinance applies to all employees of a Contractor who work within the City limits of the City of Miami Beach, Florida; and the Contractor's employees located in the United States, but outside of the City of Miami Beach limits, who are directly performing work on the contract within the City of Miami Beach. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A-Pape DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? x YES NO B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with (same or opposite sex)domestic partners`or to domestic partners of employees? x YES NO C. Please check all benefits that apply to your answers above and list in the "other" section any additional benefits not already specified. Note:some benefits are provided to employees because they have a spouse or domestic partner, such as bereavement leave;other benefits are provided directly to the spouse or domestic partner,such as medical insurance. BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees with Employees with Provide Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health x x Sick Leave x Family Medical Leave x x Bereavement Leave x x If Proposer cannot offer a benefit to domestic partners because of reasons outside your control,(e.g.,there are no insurance providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage)you may be eligible for Reasonable Measures compliance.To comply on this basis,you must agree to pay a cash equivalent and submit a completed Reasonable Measures Application(attached)with all necessary documentation.Your Reasonable Measures Application will be reviewed for consideration by the City Manager,or his designee.Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final.Further information on the Equal Benefits requirement is available at www.miamibeachfl.gov/procurement/. 10.Public Entity Crimes.Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time,states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal, proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, Statement of Qualifications, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier,subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT:No additional submittal is required.By virtue of executing this affidavit document,proposer agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. 11.Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposer or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposals are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addendum may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt OR Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 OR Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A—Pape DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA DISCLOSURE AND DISCLAIMER SECTION The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the City of Miami Beach (the"City")for the recipient's convenience. Any action taken by the City in response to Statement of Qualifications made pursuant to this solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant to such Statement of Qualifications, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. In its sole discretion,the City may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving Statement of Qualifications, may accept or reject Statement of Qualifications,and may accept Statement of Qualifications which deviate from the solicitation,as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any party or parties submitting Statement of Qualifications in response to this solicitation. Following submission of Statement of Qualifications, the applicant agrees to deliver such further details, information and assurances, including financial and disclosure data, relating to the Statement of Qualifications and the applicant including, without limitation, the applicant's affiliates,officers,directors,shareholders,partners and employees,as requested by the City in its discretion. The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of prospective Proposals. It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this solicitation. Any reliance on these contents,or on any permitted communications with City officials,shall be at the recipient's own risk. Proposals should rely exclusively on their own investigations, interpretations,and analyses.The solicitation is being provided by the City without any warranty or representation,express or implied, as to its content, its accuracy,or its completeness. No warranty or representation is made by the City or its agents that any Statement of Qualifications conforming to these requirements will be selected for consideration, negotiation, or approval. The City shall have no obligation or liability with respect to this solicitation,the selection and the award process,or whether any award will be made.Any recipient of this solicitation who responds hereto fully acknowledges all the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer, is totally relying on this Disclosure and Disclaimer,and agrees to be bound by the terms hereof.Any Statement of Qualifications submitted to the City pursuant to this solicitation are submitted at the sole risk and responsibility of the party submitting such Statement of Qualifications. This solicitation is made subject to correction of errors,omissions,or withdrawal from the market without notice. Information is for guidance only,and does not constitute all or any part of an agreement. The City and all Proposals will be bound only as, if and when a Statement of Qualifications, as same may be modified, and the applicable definitive agreements pertaining thereto, are approved and executed by the parties, and then only pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreements executed among the parties.Any response to this solicitation may be accepted or rejected by the City for any reason,or for no reason,without any resultant liability to the City. The City is governed by the Government-in-the-Sunshine Law, and all Statement of Qualifications and supporting documents shall be subject to disclosure as required by such law. All Statement of Qualifications shall be submitted in sealed proposal form and shall remain confidential to the extent permitted by Florida Statutes, until the date and time selected for opening the responses. At that time, all documents received by the City shall become public records. Proposals are expected to make all disclosures and declarations as requested in this solicitation. By submission of a Statement of Qualifications,the Proposer acknowledges and agrees that the City has the right to make any inquiry or investigation it deems appropriate to substantiate or supplement information contained in the Statement of Qualifications, and authorizes the release to the City of any and all information sought in such inquiry or investigation. Each Proposer certifies that the information contained in the Statement of Qualifications is true,accurate and complete,to the best of its knowledge,information,and belief. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything contained in the solicitation,all Proposals agree that in the event of a final unappealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction which imposes on the City any liability arising out of this solicitation, or any response thereto, or any action or inaction by the City with respect thereto,such liability shall be limited to$10,000.00 as agreed-upon and liquidated damages. The previous sentence, however, shall not be construed to circumvent any of the other provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer which imposes no liability on the City. In the event of any differences in language between this Disclosure and Disclaimer and the balance of the solicitation, it is understood that the provisions of this Disclosure and Disclaimer shall always govern. The solicitation and any disputes arising from the solicitation shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A—Page 5 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA PROPOSER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that: I,as an authorized agent of the Proposer,am submitting the following information as my firm's proposal; Proposer agrees to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto, and the Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement; proposer agrees to be bound to any and all specifications, terms and conditions contained in the solicitation, and any released Addenda and understand that the following are requirements of this solicitation and failure to comply will result in disqualification of proposal submitted; Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal; proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; all responses, data and information contained in this proposal, inclusive of the Statement of Qualifications Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Oliver Rodrigues, PE, PTOE Senior Vice President Signature of - 's Authorized Representative: Date: 03/31/2014 State of FLORIDA ) On this 31 day of March ,2014 personally appeared before me Oliver Rodrigues who County of Miami Dade ) stated that (s)he is the Senior Vice President of FTE , a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: Paula Olano ` • Notary Public for the Sta e of Flori a My Commission Expires: 05-08-2015 • 4etlitifii, PAULA OLANO MY COMMISSION#EE091118 EXPIRES May 08,2015 (407)X96-0153 FlorldaNaaryse,—ce,corn Miami Beach RFQ 2014-116-SR Appendix A—Page 6 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services FTE QUALIFICATIONS FTE is a Florida corporation founded in 1989. with locations in Chipley, Miami, Punta Gorda, Tampa, and Tallahassee. The office in charged of the City of Miami Beach contract is the Miami office locat- ed within Miami-Dade County. Local Business Tax Receipt Miami—Dade County, State of FloridaLBT -THIS IS NOT A 811L-DO NOT PAY 4284295 BUSINESS NAME/LOCATION RECEIPT NO. EXPIRES FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING INC RENEWAL SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 8750 NW 36 ST 670 4473021 Must be displayed at place of busuness DORAL FL 33178 Pursuant to County Code Chapter 8A-Art.9&10 OWNER SEC.TYPE OF BUSINESS PAYMENT RECEIVED EL IRANSPORTAIION ENGINEERING INC 212 P.A./CORP/PARTNERSHIP/FIRM BY TAX COLLECTOR EB7924 Employee(s) 1 $45.00 09/10/2013 ECHECK-13-007320 This local Business Tao Receipt only confirms payment of the Local Business Tax.The Receipt is not a license. permit.ora certification of the holders qualifications.to do business. Holder must comply with any governmental or nongovernmental regulatory laws and requirements which apply to the business. The RECEIPT NO.above must be dtspleyed on ell commercial vehicles-Miami-Dade Code Sec the-216. For more itnormetion.visit www.miamiderte.govfaocoffecfer Local Business Tax Receipt LBT Miami—Dade County, State of Florida -THIS IS NOT A BILL-DO NOT PAY 5581237 BUSINESS NAME/LOCATION RECEIPT NO. EXPIRES DEVAGUPTAPU RAVIKUMARV RENEWAL SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 8750 NW 36 ST 670 5821088 Must be displayed at place of buarnrsa DORAL FL 33178 Pursuant to County Code Chapter 8A-Att.9&10 OWNER SEC.TYPE OF BUSINESS DEVAGUPTAPU RAVIKUMAR V 212 PROFESSIONAL PAYMENT RECEIVED PE53150 BY TAX COLLECTOR $60.00 09/10/2013 ECHECK-13-007320 This Local Rosiness Tax Receipt only confirms payment of the Local Business Tax. the Receipt is note license, permit.ora certification of the holders qualifications,to do business.Holder must comply with any guvemmental or nongovernmental regulatory laws and requirements which apply to the business. The RECEIPT NO.above must be displayed on all commercial vehicles-Miami-Dade Cade Sec 8a-276. For more information,visit wwwY miemidyda.gay/laacollaclot Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) �� Page 9 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services PROJECT TEAM QUALIFICATIONS LIST OF SIMILAR PROJECTS Client: City of Miami Beach Project: General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services • 49-53 Collins Avenue Traffic Impact Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the development of"a proposed robotic parking garage with ancillary commercial uses." The project site is located at 49-53 Collins Avenue. Completed Date: 2011 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • Seville Hotel Traffic Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the development of"The Seville Hotel" a proposed re-development of at Collins Ave- nue/SR A1A between 29th Street and 30th Street. Completed Date: 2011 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • Parc Place Traffic Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the Parc Place development. The development is located at Collins Avenue/SR A1A between 20th Street and 21st Street. It will include two restaurants with 640 seats, 7,920 square-feet lounge, 18,412 square feet of retail space and 52 residential units. Completed Date: 2011 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • Sunset Palau Traffic Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the Sunset Palau Project. The development is located at 1201-1225 20th Street. It will include a residential condominium with 70 dwelling units, 8,298 square feet of retail and 4,758 square feet of quality restaurants. Completed Date: 2012 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 10 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • Block 51 Parking Garage Peer Review, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the Traffic Operations Analysis for the Block 51 Parking Garage development. The Block 51 development is part of the approved Portofino DRI. Block 51 consists of 32 residential condominium units, 13,064 square-feet of quality restaurant and 6,836 square-feet of retail space. The parking gar- age for the project will be served by mechanical lifts and will also be partially operated by valet attendants. Completed Date: 2012 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • Traffic and Pavement Assessment, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a traffic and pavement assess- ment to determine the most suitable and cost-effective approach to extend the service life of existing roadways and enhance safety for the traveling public. Completed Date: 2013 Contact:Jose A Gonzalez, PE Phone: (305) 673-7080 Ext. 6768 Email: josegonzalez@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Public Works Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • 600 Alton Road Traffic Impact study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the 600 Alton Road Project. Completed Date: 2013 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • 120 Ocean Drive Traffic Impact Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic study for the 120 Ocean Drive Project. The development consists of 10 residential units, and 625 square feet of specialty retail. Completed Date: 2013 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 11 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services • 237 20th Street-Sweet Liberty Bar Traffic Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a of a Traffic Im- pact Study(TIS)for the 237 20th Street—Sweet Liberty Bar.This site was part of the Parc Place develop- ment that was approved by the City's Planning Board. Under the Parc Place's TIS,the 237 20th street space was analyzed as a retail space(Land use code 814).The space is now intended to be use for a bar that also serves food.The purpose of the new study was to update the Parc Place developments'TIS to account for the intended new use. Completed Date: 2013 Contact:Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • 2912 Collins Avenue Traffic Impact Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the 2912 Collins Project.The development consisted of 150 hotel rooms, 168 seats for quality restaurant, 881 square feet of retail (ancillary to the hotel use), 175 parking spaces for the Marriot Hotel, and 133 parking spaces for the proposed project. Completed Date: 2013 Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime • Crown/Roosevelt Hotel -4041 Collins Avenue Traffic Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the Roosevelt/Crown Hotel Project. The development consisted of 310 hotel rooms, 342 seats for quality restaurant, and 3,000 square feet of spa. Completed Date: 2013 Contact:Xavier Falconi, PE Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Address: Planning Department 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 FTE Role: Prime Client: City of Coconut Creek Project: City of Coconut Creek General Professional Engineering Services • Seminole Tribe Traffic Impact Study: Performed a Traffic Impact Study Peer Review for the Sem- inoles Tribe of Florida Casino Expansion Phase II. FTE provided a Peer Review of a performed Traffic Impact Study. Completed Date: 2012 Contact: Osama Elshami, PE, Assistant Director Phone: (954) 973-6786 Email: OElshami@coconutcreek.net Address: City of Coconut Creek, 4800 West Copans Road, Coconut Creek, FL 33063 FTE Role: Prime Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 12 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services PROJECT MANAGER EXPERIENCE CLAUDIA LAMUS, PE Claudia has 10 years of experience in the fields of traffic and transportation engineering. She has performed a variety of projects for clients throughout Florida. Claudia's availability percentage of time to provide the services described in the scope of services is 60%. Project List: Client Name: City of Miami Beach, General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services Project Name: 600 Alton Road Traffic Impact study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the 600 Alton Road Project. - Complete Date: 2013 _ "g* r Role: Project Manager ;fa:7;f-71, 4. Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE, Project Manager " -+ wa Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 • e • -= Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov 161=6., �-' Client Name: City of Miami Beach, General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services Project Name: Block 51 Parking Garage Peer Review, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the Traffic Operations Analysis for the Block 51 Parking Garage development. The Block 51 develop- ment is part of the approved Portofino DRI. Block 51 consists of 32 residential condominium units, 13,064 square-feet of quality restaurant and 6,836 square-feet of retail space. The parking garage for the project will be served by mechanical lifts and will also be partially operated by valet attendants. Complete Date: 2012 Role: Project ManagerBISCAYNE COURT' Contact:Xavier Falconi, PE, Project Manager - Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Ma `° T Client Name: Client Name: City of Miami Beach, General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engi- neering Services Project Name: 2912 Collins Avenue Traffic Impact Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the 2912 Collins Project.The development consisted of 150 hotel rooms, 168 seats for quality restaurant, 881 square feet of eti, _ retail (ancillary to the hotel use), 175 parking spaces for the ' • h Marriot Hotel, and 133 parking spaces for the proposed pro ►„ <f ` ject. Complete Date: 2013 Role: Project Manager Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE, Project Manager Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 13 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 1.3 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS Solicitation 4:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Client Name: Client Name: City of Miami Beach, General Transpor tation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services • Project Name: 120 Ocean Drive Traffic Impact Study, Miami } - '' `' maw Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic study for the 120 Ili -3: f I sr Ocean Drive Project.The development consists of 10 residential )L7 , ;� units, and 625 square feet of specialty retail. ; Vii.. AMR Complete Date: 2013 pow Role: Project Manager Ia, , - .- Contact: Xavier Falconi, PE, Project Manager rr. L Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129MIND Email: XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov ,- Y��IyiA.••••• .. Client Name: Client Name:City of Miami Beach, General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engi- neering Services Project Name: Sunset Palau Traffic Study, Miami Beach, FL: Performed a peer review of the traffic impact study for the Sunset Palau Project. The development is located at 1201-1225 20th Street. It will include a residential condominium with 70 dwelling units, 8,298 square feet of retail and 4,758 square feet of quality :f a restaurants. ,4 :ye ,.. Complete Date: 2012 — Y, Role: Project Manager Contact:Xavier Falconi, PE, Project Manager Phone: (305) 673-7000 x 6129 Email:XavierFalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Professional Engineering Certification • State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Attests that Claudia M. Lamus, P.E. is licensed as a Professional ngineer under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes Expiration:2/28/2015 P.E.tic.No: Audit No: 228201524325 72303 Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 14 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services FTE QUALIFICATIONS FTE is a Florida corporation founded in 1989 by Nannette Hall, P.E. Ms. (,11,,;,,,/•jc?,;,ti, Hall was a former Traffic Operations Engineer with FDOT District One and a Minority,Women&Florida Veteran former Transportation Manager with the City of Tampa. The firm provides Business Certification services in Highway Design, Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, F,,,,,,,,,,,UsInc GIS, Land & Sports Development, Survey & Mapping, and Construction In- spection. We have worked with several municipalities in Florida. FTE is an ,„q,„, -„,,,�,,, industry leader in traffic engineering and is recognized for its state of the ��� TETWIS art technology. FTE has provided services in a prime role for two FDOT . Districtwide Safety Studies contracts, three Districtwide Traffic Studies contracts, seven Districtwide Data Collection contracts, one Districtwide Minor Design contract and numer- ous Countywide Data Collection and Traffic Engineering contracts. The firm is a certified DBE firm with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and a certified MBE firm with the Florida Department of Management Services. FTE is prequalified with FDOT to offer the following services: • Project Development and Environmental (PD&E)Studies `T• FM./4..rrl P..m....a.. • Major& Minor Highway Design • Traffic Engineering Studies • Traffic Signal Timing• Signing& Pavement Marking • Signalization _ =- -=-�'- • Highway Lighting • Survey and Mapping • Construction Engineering Inspection • Systems Planning • Subarea/Corridor Planning - i. -- • Transportation Statistics. s --—----- FTE is certified with Miami Dade County in the following technical categories: • Urban Area & Regional Transportation Planning a — • Mass& Rapid Transit Planning r, = • Highway Design WNW w ,._. WWW.WW. .:g • Traffic Engineering Studies - -- — = = • Traffic Counts '” WWIWWI • Traffic Calming _ _..._•_ _ ._ • Traffic Signal Timing : W10. WWI r..�.__.. • Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization • Lighting • Signalization • General Civil Engineering. Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 15 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services EXPERIENCE Project: City of Miami Beach General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services Client: City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, FL 33139 Contact: Xavier Falconi, Project Manager Telephone: (305) 673-7080 Facsimile: (305) 673-7559 Email: xavierfalconi@miamibeachfl.gov Date of Contract: 2010— Ongoing Project: City of Coconut Creek General Professional Engineering Services Client: City of Coconut Creek, 5295 Johnson Road, Coconut Creek, FL 33073 Contact: Osama Elshami, PE, Assistant Director Telephone: (954) 973-6786 ' Facsimile: (954) 571-4146 `ii Vik . Email: OElshami@coconutcreek.net F'i'`, Date of Contract: April 2012— October 2012 Project: City of Bonita Springs Traffic Circulation Study Client: City of Bonita Springs, 9101 Bonita Beach Road, Bonita Springs, FL �• spitii.. 34135 f= Contact: Matt Feeney, Public Works Director - Telephone: (239) 949-6246 Facsimile: (239) 949-6245 . Email: matt.feeney@cityofbonitasprings.org Date of Contract: 2009— 2010 Project: Miami Dade County Data Collection and Miscellaneous Traffic Engineering Client: Miami Dade County, 111 NW 1st Street, 21st Floor, Miami, FL 33128 Contact: David Hays MIAMI DE Telephone: 305-375-1019 COUNTY Facsimile: 305-372-6064 Email: hays@miamidade.gov Date of Contract: 2005-2010 Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 16 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM Solicitation u:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Project:Town of Surfside Parking Lot Improvements Client: Town of Surfside �URFSI E��� 0 Contact: Bill Evans �� �; Telephone: (305) 861-4863 h Email: bevans@townofsurfsidefl.com 1`; FI.DRID� 5�� Date of Contract: 2010-2012 Project: Charlotte County Transportation Engineering Services Client: Charlotte County, 8500 Murdock Circle, Suite 344, Port Charlotte, FL 33948 Contact: Tara Musselman Telephone: 941-743-1378 14* Email:Tara.Musselman@charlottefl.com T. Date of Contract: 2012 - 2013 Name: City of Punta Gorda Professional Engineering Services 4U Address: 326 W. Marion Ave, Punta Gorda, FL 33950 ti Contact: Mark Gering, PE, City Engineer �•, Telephone: (941) 575-5050 �r ;} Facsimile: (941) 575-5044of Email: MGering@pgorda.us Date of Contract:August 2012—October 2012 Project: City of North Port Professional Consultant/Engineering Services GF�� Client: City of North Port, 4970 City Hall Blvd, North Port, FL 34286 •�► '�y Contact: Benjamin E. Newman, Project Manager ;1:A Ci Telephone: (941) 429-7086 -4 Facsimile: (941) 429-7164 • "7......t4r '°° • Email: bnewman@cityofnorthport.com NIR ! Date of Contract: Ongoing Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 17 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic t ngineering Consulting Services KEY STAFF This section includes Organizational Chart and resumes of key personnel assigned to the City of Miami Beach Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 18 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA • City of Miami Beach 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER TEAM Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Organizational Chart City of Miami Beach Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Solicitation No. 2014-116-SR '''' E City of Miami Beach PRIME CONSULTANT ea FTE Project Manager Claudia Lamus, PE -60%* QA/QC Manager Oliver Rodrigues. PE. PTOE -40%* Review: Review: Trip Generation Parking Operation Travel Demand Forecast Vehicle Circulation 11111 Micro-Simulation Claudia Lam us, PE -60%* Claudia Lamus, PE -60%* Megan Mecham, El -60%* Megan Mecham, El - 60%* Ravi Kamarajugadda, GISP -40%* Sijong Jo, PhD. -60%* Ravi Kamarajugadda, GISP -40%* Review: Attend: Geometric Design Planning Board Hearing Carlos Borges -60%* Claudia Lamus, PE -60%* Claudia Lamus, PE 60%* Oliver Rodrigues, PE, PTOE -40%* Percentage of Availability Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) -"f TE --..w.—„,_,,-----,„....___ ____----FTE ' Page 19 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA CLAUDIA LAMUS, PE Project Manager 1 Senior Transportation Engineer Key Qualifications Mrs. Lamus has over ten years of experience in traffic operations, safety studies, transportation planning, and traffic impact studies. Mrs. Lamus has prepared and reviewed technical reports for FDOT Districts Four and Six as well as various cities and counties. Key Projects City of Miami Beach Traffic Impact Studies; City of Miami Beach, (2011 — Ongoing) Senior Transportation Engineer - FTE is providing professional services general transportation planning and traffic engineering consulting services, on as needed basis, for the City of Miami Beach, pursuant to RFQ No.55-08/09, general Years of Experience transportation planning and traffic engineering consulting services. Claudia has 2 Years with FTE performed and reviewed various traffic impact studies and under this contract. 8 Years with Other Firm Reference:Xavier Falconi,City of Miami Beach, 305-673-7000 Ext.6129 Education Transportation Statistics Support No.3,Contract No.C-8T89, FPID 408199-1-12, B.S.,Civil Engineering,Florida FDOT District Six (2011 — On-going) Senior Transportation Engineer - FTE is International University,2001 responsible for In-house support, statewide district coordination and involved in the following programs: roadway jurisdictional transfers, urban boundaries, functional M.S.,Civil Engineering,Florida classification, and NHS designations, RCI, SLD's, HPMS development, traffic count International University,2004 stations program, TTMS and PTMS implementation, work program, project traffic Professional Registrations forecasting, Database management, and LOS. Claudia has prepared various ESAL Professional Engineer,FL No. reports under this contract. Reference: Neil Lyn, FDOT D6, 305-470-5373 72303 US-1/South Dixie Highway (Bus way) PD&E Study; MDX Authority (2011-On- Professional Registrations going) Senior Transportation Engineer - Currently a sub consultant for the Miami Institute of Transportation Dade Expressway Authority. Performing an evaluation of existing travel and Engineers geometric conditions, crash history,and travel time along the project corridor.Claudia is preparing design traffic to evaluate lane alternatives. Reference:Carlos Cejas, PE; Gannett Fleming,786-845-9540. Congestion Mitigation Study at Kings Highway and Sandhill Boulevard, Charlotte County, (2013-On-going) Senior Transportation Engineer — Claudia is preparing the development of a traffic study to create various alternatives for congestion mitigation at the intersection of Kings Highway at Sandhill Boulevard and the surrounding area. Reference: Venkat Vattikuti, P.E., PTOE; Charlotte County, 941-623-1064 Kendall Drive Transit Signal Priority Pilot Study, Miami Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL (2012-2013): Senior Transportation Engineer— Claudia was in charge of preparing a Traffic study to assess the impact of bus priority as part of a pilot program initiated by Miami Dade County MPO. The corridor Kendall Dr. from 137 Ave. to SW 127 Ave. was analyzed using VISSIM. Reference: Jitender Ramchandani,AICP,HNTB,305-551-8100 Resume—Claudia Lamus,PE Page 20 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA South Florida Regional Transportation Authority(SFRTA)Tri-Rail Transit Development Plan-On Board Ridership Survey, Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, FL (2013-On-going): Senior Transportation Engineer — As a subconsultant, FTE conducted an on-board travel survey of SFRTA Tri-Rail riders for the purpose of capturing travel patterns,socio-economic characteristics,and customer opinions and preferences.The primary goal of this survey effort is to gather information related to current ridership patterns and identify areas for improvements to support SFRTA's FY 2014- 2023 Transit Development Plan(TDP), Major Update.Claudia was in charge of coordinating the on-board surveys as well as the database created for the project.Reference:Odalys Delgado,AICP;HNTB,305-551-8100 Seminole Tribe Traffic Impact Study, City of Coconut Creek (2012-2013): Senior Transportation Engineer — Claudia performed a Traffic Impact Study Peer Review for the Seminoles Tribe of Florida Casino Expansion Phase II. Reference:Osama Elshami,PE;City of Coconut Creek,954-973-6786 Flagler Street and NW 74 Avenue Crash Analysis, Traffic Operations & Safety Studies, FDOT District Six (2012): Senior Transportation Engineer—Claudia performed a fatal crash analysis and provided recommendations for the intersection of Flagler Street and NW 74 Avenue. Reference:Winston Harris, PE, PTOE; RS&H, 954-236-7369 Traffic Studies, City of North Port, FL (2013 - On-going): Senior Transportation Engineer—Claudia performed four traffic studies and provided recommendations for following locations in the City of North Port:Chamberlain Boulevard from North Cranberry Boulevard to Hillsborough Boulevard; New London Street and Acosta Avenue Intersection; East Price Boulevard and Yorkshire Boulevard; Purdue Street and Geranium Avenue.Reference: Daniel Waldrom,City of North Port, 941-240-8097 SR 87 Connector PD&E Study, FDOT District Three, (2013-Ongoing): Senior Transportation Engineer—Claudia is performing a peer review of the Operational Analysis submitted as part of the DTTM for a new roadway facility that will directly link SR 87S with SR87N in the vicinity of the City of Milton in Santa Rosa County. Reference:Harold Watters, PE; FDOT D3,850-836-5777 SR 874/Don Shula Expressway Ramp Connector (PD&E) Study (2010-2012): RJB Project Engineer — Claudia was in charge of preparing an Interchange Justification Report (IJR) as part of the PD&E process. The study assesses the existing and future traffic operations of the interchange using Synchro and Corsim software. Reference: Sonia Shreffler, PE, PTOE; Metric Engineering, 305-235-5098 Ext. 117 1-75/Griffin Road Interchange (2007-2010): RJB Project Engineer— Claudia prepared an Interchange Operational Analysis Report(IOAR)for the interchange at Griffin Road and 1-75 in Broward County.The study included signalized intersection analysis, weaving analysis, queuing analysis, ramp analysis, interchange capacity analysis and crash analysis. Reference:Julio Delgado, FDOT D4,954-777-4390 NW 87th Avenue Traffic Study (2005-2007): RJB Project Engineer—Claudia prepare a traffic study to determine the optimal geometrics, traffic operations and signal warrants for 8 intersections. Reference: Ana Arvelo, PE, FDOT D6, 305-470-5210 Resume—Claudia Lamus,PE Page 21 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA OLIVER RODRIGUES, P.E., PTOE Senior Vice President Key Qualifications Oliver has more than 22 years of experience in the area of transportation planning and traffic engineering. He has performed a variety of projects for clients throughout Florida. He conducted various transit ridership studies and corridor feasibility studies. Oliver provides traffic engineering services and performs qualitative assessment and recommends mitigation measures. He also prepares design plans for signing and pavement markings,decorative street lighting,and signalization. Key Projects HART Transit Emphasis Corridor Improvements Planning,Hillsborough County,FL Years of Experience (2007-2008): Project Engineer at Bayside Engineering—As a subconsultant, evaluated 12 Years with FTE; 10 Years existing conditions at bus stops and crosswalks for the initial bus rapid transit (BRT) with Other Firms improvements. This included a north-south corridor from Downtown Tampa to USF Telecom Park, and an east-west corridor from the West Shore Business District to Education Netpark. B.S., Civil Engineering, University, South Florida, HART Nebraska Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Study, Tampa, FL (2009-2010): Project 1991 Engineer at Bayside Engineering - Performed traffic engineering services and ridership surveys for the development of conceptual and feasibility plans for a bus rapid system. Professional Registrations Pinellas County MPO, Clearwater Beach, FL (2007-2008): Project Engineer at Professional Engineer, FL No. Bayside Engineering - As a subconsultant, conducted a travel survey of tourist and 50646 employees. The project evaluated a bus rapid transit route as a near term alternative and Professional Traffic a higher level transit system as a long term alternative. Identified bus and route Operations Engineer No. 1765 treatments,and station locations. Professional Affiliations Kendall Drive Transit Signal Priority Pilot Study, Miami Dade MPO General Institute of Transportation Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL (2012-2013): Project Manager - The MPO Engineers initiated this pilot study to assess the impacts of Bus priority at selected intersections Florida Engineering Society within the corridor. In order to best analyze the impacts of TSP along the corridor, including any impacts on the signal coordination system, the Kendall Drive segment of American Society of Highway SW 137th Avenue to SW 127th Avenue was selected as the study area for this project. Engineers The purpose of this study was to assess the impacts of bus priority. Reduction in bus control delay and bus travel time,minimal delay to non-transit vehicles were the Measures of Effectiveness(MOE)for this study.FTE is a subconsultant providing traffic engineering and data collection services,and report preparation. US-1/South Dixie Highway (Busway) Study, Miami Dade Expressway Authority (MDX), Florida(2011-0n-going): Project Manager- FTE is currently providing services as a sub consultant for the Miami Dade Expressway Authority. The services include:data collection,Crash Data Analysis,Inventory of existing signage along the project study area, Origin Destination Survey,Travel Time Survey Information and Analysis,Auto-Occupancy Study, Modeling through Trip Development, Defining Target Travel Times, Development of Design Traffic, Travel Time Validation, and managing Lanes Concepts Alternatives Testing. Douglas Road Transit Corridor Study, Miami-Dade MPO General Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL (2013-0n-going): Project Manager-As a subconsultant, FTE evaluated travel characteristics for a potential new route along the Douglas Road Resume—Oliver Rodrigues,P.E.,PTOE Page 22 ./ DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Corridor from the Miami Intermodal Center(MIC)to Coral Gables/Coconut Grove area. Evaluated travel time and speed, identified operational deficiencies,prepared technical memorandum. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) Tri-Rail Transit Development Plan - On Board Ridership Survey, Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, FL (2013-On-going): Project Manager — As a sub- consultant, FTE conducted an on-board travel survey of SFRTA Tri-Rail riders for the purpose of capturing travel patterns, socio-economic characteristics, and customer opinions and preferences. The primary goal of this survey effort is to gather information related to current ridership patterns and identify areas for improvements to support SFRTA's FY 2014-2023 Transit Development Plan(TDP), Major Update. Miami Dade County MPO GPC, Miami Beach Transit Planning Study, Miami Beach, FL (2011-Ongoing): Project Manager-Currently a sub consultant for the Miami Dade MPO. FTE performed transit survey distribution to Hotels and residents through North and Middle Miami Beach, as well as,surveys results data entry. City of Miami Beach Traffic Impact Studies; City of Miami Beach, FL(2010-Ongoing): Project Manager-FTE is providing professional services the City of Miami Beach General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering consulting services. FTE has performed various traffic impact studies under this contract, as well as, a pavement assessment to determine the most suitable and cost-effective approaches to extend the service life of existing roadways and enhance safety for the traveling public. Resume—Oliver Rodrigues,P.E.,PTOE Page 23 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SIJONG JO, PH.D. Senior Transportation Engineer Key Qualifications Dr. Jo has an extensive background in all phases of traffic engineering and transportation modeling. He is especially proficient in computer modeling, traffic operation analysis, traffic and revenue forecasts and authored several publications. Dr. Jo has also spearheaded the completion of numerous traffic engineering assignments in the United States and in several foreign countries. Dr. Jo has strong technical and computer skills and extensive experience in all phases of Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) feasibility studies in Asia including Korea, Vietnam and Pakistan. He is highly proficient in traffic engineering and transportation planning with special emphasis in simulation software and demand forecast models, including CORSIM, VISSIM, HCS, TRANSYT-7F, SIDRA, Cube, Emme/2, TRANPLAN and TransCAD. Significant computer programming skills using Visual Years of Experience Basic and Fortran as well as GIS. 1 Year with FTE 17 Years with Other Firms Key Projects US-1/South Dixie Highway (Busway) Study, Miami Dade Expressway Authority Education (MDX), (2011-0n-going): Senior Transportation Engineer - Engineering Analysis Ph.D.,Civil Engineering, and Reports, Crash Data, Design Traffic,Travel Time Validation, Street Traffic Impact Florida International Analysis Parameters, Design Traffic Technical Memorandum, Meetings, Access University,2001-2003 Management, Quality Assurance, Public Involvement, and Public Meetings. Dr. Jo has been instrumental in creating the VISSIM model for the network containing over Ph.D., Civil Engineering(all 100 intersections. Reference:Carlos Cejas, PE;Gannett Fleming, 786-845-9540. requirements met except Congestion Mitigation Study at Kings Highway and Sandhill Boulevard, dissertation), University of Charlotte County, (2013-0n-going) Senior Transportation Engineer- Development Florida, 1989-1993 of a traffic study to create various alternatives for congestion mitigation at the M.S.,Civil Engineering,Seoul intersection of Kings Highway at Sandhill Boulevard and the surrounding area. Dr Jo National University, 1985 performed travel demand forecasting using SMCC model. Reference: Venkat 1987 Vattikuti, P.E., PTOE;Charlotte County,941-623-1064 Kendall Drive Transit Signal Priority Pilot Study, Miami Dade MPO General B.S., Civil Engineering,Seoul Planning Consultant, Miami-Dade, FL (2012-2013): Senior Transportation Engineer— National University, 1981- As part of a traffic study to evaluate the impact of bus priority for a pilot program initiated 1985 by Miami Dade County MPO; Dr.Jo analyzed Kendall Dr. corridor from 137 Ave.to SW 127 Ave.using VISSIM.Reference:Jitender Ramchandani,AICP,HNTB,305-551-8100 Golden Glades Interchange PD&E study in Miami-Dade County, FDOT District Six, (2011-2012): Metric Engineering Senior Traffic Engineer/Transportation Planner, Dr. Jo performed operational analysis of freeway, ramps and urban street using CORSIM, SYNCHRO and HCS. 1-395 PD&E Study in Miami-Dade County, FDOT District Six, (2006-2008): Metric Engineering Senior Transportation Engineer — Dr. Jo performed travel demand forecast using TRANPLAN, operational analysis of freeway and urban street using CORSIM and SYNCHRO. Reference:Vilma Croft, FDOT D6, 305-470-5400 SR-836 PD&E Study from NW 17th Ave Interchange to Midtown Interchange in Miami-Dade County, FDOT District Six, (2003-2004): Metric Engineering Senior Transportation Engineer — Dr. Jo performed travel demand forecast using TRANPLAN, operational analysis of freeway and urban streets using CORSIM and SYNCHRO. Reference:Vilma Croft, FDOT D6,305-470-5400. Resume—Sijong Jo,Ph.D. Page 24 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA CARLOS BORGES Design Engineer Key Qualifications years has 15 years of professional experience in Roadway Design, Structures Design, and Traffic Engineering. His experience includes preparing design plans for .,fir, ` roadway, traffic signalization, signing and pavement marking and street lighting, projects. He has experience preparing specification packages and cost estimates. Carlos has coordinated with utility companies and maintaining agencies, as well as coordination during construction services relating to request for information and shop YN: drawing approval. He has training in Basic Lighting and Electricity as well as computer/software skills in Microstation XM, Geopak, GuideSign, AutoTurn, and Visual Lighting. Years of Experience Key Projects 2 Years with FTE NW 42nd Avenue Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Improvements, City of Coconut 13 Years with Other Firms Creek, FL (2012-2013): Design Engineer- Design and development of construction Education contract documents for the addition of curb and gutter and the enhancement of B.S.,Civil Engineering,University of the multiuse trail system with ADA compliant features. Develop signing and marking Havana,Cuba,1990 plans for a pedestrian mid-block crossing with flashing beacon. Professional Certifications SR 5 /US 1 from Beach Rd to CountyLine Rd, FDOT District 4, Palm Beach •Basic Lighting&Electrical Signalization Design County, FL (2012-On-going): Design Engineer- Design and prepare complete set •GIS Applications&Mapping of construction plans for Milling and resurfacing the existing 6-lane urban, divided •Roadway Characteristic Inventory arterial along SR-5/US 1 from Beach Rd to County Line Rd in Palm Beach County, to (RCI) extend the service life of the existing roadway. Includes the analysis of existing •SysteHighmay Performance Monitoring m(HPMS) pavement conditions, roadway slopes, geometry, clear zone, signalized intersections and appropriate implementation of analysis. Pedestrian ramps shall be upgraded as Technical Skills necessary. Upgrade pedestrian detectors and signals •Microstation XM •Geopak SR-953/LeJeune Rd from SE 11 Place To N Of SR 9341E 25 St, FDOT District 6, •GuideSign •AutoTurn FL (2010-2013): Design Engineer - Provided design services for signing and pavement markings and signalization improvements along LeJeune Road. Updated existing signs to MUTCD 2009 standards. Close coordination with roadway design and maintaining agencies for signalization and transit facilities along the corridor. Midway Blvd Phase 2 Roadway Design (Scotten Street to Kings Hwy), Charlotte County, FL(2012-On-going): Design Engineer-FTE is providing lighting and signal design services to complete the design and reconstruction of Midway Boulevard, a two-lane roadway,to a four-lane urban arterial from Scotten Street to Kings Highway, a distance of approximately 2.12 miles, located in Charlotte County. CR 771 (Gasparilla Road) Improvements (SR 776 to Rotonda Blvd East), Charlotte County, FL (2012-On-going): Design Engineer - FTE is obtaining and developing intersection traffic data as required to design and provide intersection control plans utilizing the following tasks: Data Collection (8-hour turning movement counts and 24-hour approach counts at five locations along CR 771); Signal Warrant Analysis; Traffic Analysis; technical memorandum preparation; Develop Design Alternatives; Lighting;and Signalization. Resume—Carlos Borges low. o, Page 25 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA US 41 Multi-Use Recreational Trail (MURT) Decorative Lighting Design (LAP Funding), FDOT District 1, FL (2011-On-going): Design Engineer - FTE is currently working with FDOT District 1 and City of Punta Gorda to complete the decorative lighting design for the MURT along US 41. Burnt Store Lakes Lighting Design, Charlotte County, FL (2011-2012): Design Engineer- FTE is providing a set of decorative lighting plans for multiple roadways within the MSBU. The scope involved public involvement, coordination with the MSBU,County,and FP&L. SR 112 (Airport Expressway), MDX - Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, FL (2010-2011): ADA Engineering Designer - Project extension of 3 miles of SR 112 including connection west to NW 27 Avenue. Participated and assisted in the design of the safety and infrastructure improvements,widening, milling and resurfacing of the highway and all ramps, signalization, pavement markings, lighting, ITS and drainage. Involvement also included the design of MOT,and cost estimate construction. SR 112 Off System Signage - MDX - Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, FL (2010-2011): ADA Engineering Designer - Signing Project to replace all existing signage approaching the new tolling system, responsibilities includes all Guidesigns, proposed overead structures,signing plans,quality control and quantities. NW 25 Street Roadway Reconstruction and New Construction of Viaduct, Miami-Dade County, FL (2000- 2002): Marlin Project Engineer- Responsible for preparing contract plans Traffic Control and the Lighting, Signing and Markings components for this major urban reconstruction project. District wide Railroad Services, FDOT District 4, FL, (2008-2010): Marlin Engineering Project Engineer-SR 706 Indiantown Road, SR 822 Sheridan Street, SR 736 Davie Blvd. railroad crossings at F.E.C. Railway. In charge of coordination with governmental agencies, design traffic, traffic control plan and detour for road closure. Inspection of traffic control by barricades by sub-contractor. Pedestrian Corridor Improvements, FDOT District 6, FL (2004-2006): Marlin Engineering Project Engineer - Preparing roadway, signing and markings, and signalization plans for several state corridors within Miami- Dade County. This included minor pedestrian improvements to 61 select intersections within the seven corridors as recommended by a Safety Report performed by the District's Traffic Operation Office. Resume—Carlos Borges Page 26 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA RAVI KAMARAJUGADDA, GISP GIS Specialist 1 Transportation Engineer Key Qualifications Ravi has over thirteen years of experience and is responsible for traffic engineering projects. His expertise includes traffic operations and safety studies, GIS projects, planning, and several traffic analysis studies. He provides GIS support services for FDOT. Additional responsibilities include data collection, signal warrant analysis, intersection analysis,crash analysis,and speed studies. Key Projects D-1 Districtwide Access Management, C-9366, FMN 409278-1-32-03 (2011- Ongoing): FTE provided data collection services on US 41 in Lee County as a Years of Experience subconsultant to PB Americas. 13 Years with FTE D-1 Districtwide Miscellaneous Traffic Operations and Safety Studies, C-6605, Education FMN 198052-1-32-01 (1997-2002): FTE provided services for Signal Warrant B.S., Civil Engineering, Analysis, Intersection Analysis, Arterial Study, Composite Study. Tasks included SR Nagarijuna University, India 45 (US 41) from North of 69th Street to SR 684 (Cortez Road) Manatee County 1993 Safety Improvement Evaluation; Charlotte County Off-System Sidewalk Improvement Study; 1-75 Aerial Survey; Turn Lane Feasibility Study on US Bus 41 at 21st Street; Professional Certifications US 17 at Regent Road Safety Improvement Evaluation; Districtwide Crash Locations • Sign Installation& Studies, Fatal Crash and Skid Reviews; SR 25 (US 27) at US 192 Safety Evaluation Inspection Study, Phase II; 8-hour Turning Movement Counts and Pedestrian Counts; . Guardrail Installation& Intersection Analysis for SR 780/Fruitville Road at Beneva Road (and to the west); Inspection Safety Engineering Analysis. • Concrete Field Technician: D-3 Districtwide Miscellaneous Traffic Count Services, RFP-DOT-09110-3012RY, Level 1 B-DQ40, FMN 220984-1-32-14 (2010-2012): FTE is providing services throughout • Asphalt Paving Technician: the District including intersection traffic counts, eight (8) hour turning movement Level 1 counts, ten (10) hour turning movement counts, twelve (12) hour turning movement • Intermediate Maintenance counts, twenty-four (24) hour traffic counts (approach), vehicle speed studies, of Traffic intersection delay studies, vehicle gap size, intersection topography, and travel time • Concrete Field Testing and delay studies. Technician Grade 1 • Nuclear Gauge Safety Class D-6 Districtwide Traffic Operations Studies, C-8837, FMN 409521-1-32-01 (2003- • GISP Certification 2007): The project included Qualitative Assessments, Signal Warrant Analysis, . Post Graduate Diploma in Intersection Analysis, Arterial Analysis, Left Turn Phase Warrant Analysis, & Computer Application Supplemental Tasks. The task work orders included turning movement counts, . Oracle(DBA) volume and classification counts, intersection delay studies, intersection qualitative • Visual Basic Certified assessment, arterial qualitative assessment, left turn signal warrant study,fatal crash • Java Certified reviews, RRR safety reviews, signal warrant analysis, sight distance studies, and - ESRI ARCGIS 10 preparation of technical memorandums. Deployment D-6 Traffic Operations & Safety Studies, C-8Z25, FMN 250650-2-32-01 (2012): • AutoCAD Certified FTE provided subconsultant services to RS&H including technical memorandum, • Planning Roadway Data fatal crash analysis,data collection,collision diagrams. Collection • RCI Fundamentals 101, D- 7 Districtwide Signal Retiming: Subconsultant to Albeck Gerken, Inc. FTE's 102, 103 scope of services includes seven-day bidirectional approach counts and eight-hour • RCI Office Class turning movement counts. • RCI Field Class Midway Blvd Phase 2 Roadway Design (Scotten Street to Kings Hwy), Charlotte • RCI Advanced County, FL (08/06/2012-Ongoing): FTE is providing lighting and signal design • HPMS services to complete the design and reconstruction of Midway Boulevard, a two-lane Resume—Ravi Kamarajugadda,GISP Page 27 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA roadway, to a four-lane urban arterial from Scotten Street to Kings Highway, a distance of approximately 2.12 miles, located in Charlotte County. Reference:Andy Wickerson, Giffels Webster Engineers, Inc. (941)475-7981. CR 771 (Gasparilla Road) Improvements (SR 776 to Rotonda Blvd East), Charlotte County, FL (05/2412012- Ongoing): FTE is obtaining and developing intersection traffic data as required to design and provide intersection control plans utilizing the following tasks: Data Collection (8-hour turning movement counts and 24-hour approach counts at five locations along CR 771); Signal Warrant Analysis; Traffic Analysis; technical memorandum preparation; Develop Design Alternatives; Lighting;and Signalization. Reference: Ryan K. Bell, P.E.,Johnson Engineering, Inc.(239)334-0046. Lee County Signal Retiming. CN-10-06, Lee County Project No 6066, FPN 414084-1 (Subconsultant to VANUS Group of Gannett Fleming [2010- Present]: FTE's scope of services include signal assessment, "Before" system assessment,eight-hour turning movement counts,seven-day counts and classification, methodology and draft timing plan reports, final timing plans, preparing the system database, fine-tuning, "After" system assessment, peak season travel time evaluations. The peak season and off peak season timings are developed for US 41 Corridor over four(4)zones Charlotte County Signal Retiming. WO#70, RLI #2006000002 [2010- Present]: FTE's scope of services includes signal assessment, "Before" system assessment, eight-hour turning movement counts, seven-day continuous traffic counts, data analysis and documentation, methodology and draft timing plan reports, final timing plans, system timing implementation and fine tuning, preparing the system database,fine-tuning, "After"system assessment.The peak season and off peak season timings are developed for Kings Highway Corridor. Lee County Data Collection & Misc. Traffic Engineering Services: The scope of this project was to provide specific professional services to the Department throughout Lee County. Assignments have included Traffic Volume Data Collection, One-way Tolling Test Program, Signal Warrant Analysis, Signal Design, Traffic Circulation Study, and Pedestrian Access Improvements. City of Bonita Springs Traffic Data Collection and Studies:Traffic Data Collection (25 locations), Spot Speed Studies (11 locations), Speed Limit Evaluation (11 locations), Stop Sign Evaluation Studies(19 locations), Sight Distance Studies (10 locations), Signal Warrant Analysis, Existing Conditions Evaluation, Video Data Collection (10 roadways), Collision Diagrams (30 locations), Travel Demand Model (FSUTMS) Calibration, FSUTMS runs for 2 years and 8 alternatives, Travel Demand Model runs for Corridor Feasibility Studies (21 scenarios), Review of Traffic Impacts from Proposed Developments, Concurrency Issues, GIS Mapping, Intersection Improvement Evaluation, Interchange Evaluation, Roadway Classification, Public Involvement. Miami Dade County Data Collection and Misc. Traffic Engineering Services: Provide miscellaneous traffic engineering services including 469 traffic counts, signal design at 17 locations, safety studies, design of traffic circles, traffic studies,signal warrant analysis,and Area Planning. Traffic Engineering Services, Charlotte, Lee, Collier, Sarasota, Manatee, and Miami-Dade County, Florida: Project engineer: Provide general engineering services in support for local traffic studies. Tasks for commercial developments, office, library, medical facilities include traffic studies, signal warrant studies, intersection analyses, sight distance studies, gap studies,delay studies,as well as traffic data collection, including vehicle counts and turning movement counts. Neighborhood Speed Reduction Signing, Tampa, Florida: Project Engineer for tasks including collecting speed limit information in various locations in the City of Tampa and preparing a report for Speed Reductions. Resume—Ravi Kamarajugadda,GISP Page 28 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MEGAN MECHAM, El Engineer Key Qualifications .4 Megan is a Civil Engineer with a Master Degree from Oregon State University.As an Engineering Intern, Megan has performed a traffic impact analysis for a proposed development; designed vertical and horizontal alignments for a new road using AASHTO standards; drafted roadway profiles for alignment; managed a project to develop a future corridor plan; drafted the preliminary design for a roundabout; designed the signal timing plan for a four-intersection corridor; and optimized a traffic ' ' calming plan for a local neighborhood in Corvallis, OR. • Key Projects Transit Development Plan Major Update, Miami Dade Transit, (2013—Ongoing): Engineer-Currently a sub consultant for Miami-Dade Transit(MDT). Assisting in the Y 1 eaYearrs owithf ExFTErpeience Transit Development Plan Major Update by gathering and analyzing census and MDT 2 Years with Other Firms user data, developing GIS maps of municipalities' local bus/trolley routes, and researching master plans of other transportation agencies. Reference: John F. Education Lafferty, Parsons Brinkerhoff, 305-261-4785 B.S.,Civil Engineering,University of Idaho,2010 Beach Corridor Traffic Connection Study, (2013 — Ongoing): Engineer - M.S.,Civil Engineering,Oregon State Assisting in the update of a 2003 Environmental Impact Statement by researching University,2012 census data and construction/development in downtown Miami and Miami Beach. Professional Registrations Reference:Carlos Cejas, PE; Gannett Fleming, 786-845-9540. Engineer Intern,E-7332 Districtwide Modal Development Consultant; FDOT District 4, (2013—Ongoing): Engineer - Currently a sub consultant for FDOT District 4. FTE is collecting and analyzing yearly pedestrian and bicycle counts throughout the district. FTE is also collecting vehicle delay data at railroad crossings in Districts 4 and 6. Reference: Jessica Vargas;Tindale-Oliver,954-489-2748 US-1/South Dixie Highway (Bus way) PD&E Study, MDX Authority, (2010 — Ongoing): Engineer - Currently a sub consultant for the Miami Dade Expressway Authority. Performing an evaluation of existing travel and geometric conditions,crash history, and travel time along the project corridor. She is assisting with traffic design to evaluate lane alternatives. Reference: Carlos Cejas, PE; Gannett Fleming, 786- 845-9540. Tolled Managed Highways with Rapid/Enhanced Bus Routes and Ridership Study: Miami-Dade MPO, (2013): Engineer - Currently a Sub consultant for the Miami Dade MPO. Researching the use of toll revenues by various tolling agencies/authorities across the United States. Reference: Carlos Cejas, PE; Gannett Fleming, 786-845-9540. Districtwide Transportation Statistics- Federal Functional Classification, FDOT District 1, (2013—2014): Engineer- FTE is performing services to support the State Planning and Transportation Statistics (TranStat) Office, as specifically related to federal Highway Administration (FHWA) procedures for designating urban boundaries, and determining federal functional classification designators (federal aid system assignments) for all public roads in District One. Reference: Ron Gruver; FDOT District One, 863-519-2547 Resume—Megan Mecham,El Page 29 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 35th Street Corridor Study (Corvallis, OR), Oregon State University Transportation Planning Class, (2011- 2011): Project Manager - Managed approximately 12 people on four specialty teams to develop alternatives to expand the 35th Street Corridor that borders the western edge of Oregon State University's campus. Alternatives included signalizing intersections, constructing a raised median and roundabouts, and using a combination of signalized intersections and roundabouts. Proximity to campus required special consideration of pedestrians and bicyclists in addition to possible future transit routes. Reference: Katharine Hunter-Zaworski, P.E., Ph.D.; Oregon State University, 541-737-4982 Parking Lot Redesign, Idaho National Laboratory, (2010-2010): Engineering Intern - Redesigned Willow Creek Building parking lot to increase safety of pedestrians and discourage speeding vehicles. Reference: Stephanie Austad, P.E., Idaho National Laboratory, 208-526-2054 Resume—Megan Mecham,El Page 30 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 2.3 FINANCIAL CAPACITY Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Supplier Qualification Report (SQR) A Supplier Qualification Report (SQR)from Dun & Bradstreet was directly submitted to Ms. Sandra M. Rico, Senior Procurement Specialist. Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) �. Page 31 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Solicitation tt:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services APPROACH TO THE SERVICES A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is an important tool in the overall development planning process. It pro- vides the City with information to evaluate the impact of a proposed development with respect to the need for roadway/intersection capacity, operations and safety improvements, as well as to identify the required mitigation measures for any impacts identified. FTE and the proposed PM, Claudia Lamus, has performed and reviewed numerous TIS for multiple municipalities including the peer review for 11 developments for the City of Miami Beach. FTE prepares and reviews impact studies following the guidelines set in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice, the ITE's Parking Generation and FDOT's Transportation Impact Handbook. FTE acknowledges that the TIS prepared and presented to the City of Miami Beach are program- matic as the development applications are reviewed by the Planning Board. Therefore, a review of the TIS must be turned around within 5 days. From our previous experience, we clearly understand that the following requirements are critical for a TIS, which enables the FTE team to conduct the review of TIS submitted to the City and make recommendations. FTE knows the importance of the accuracy of these peer reviews since City staff will have to defend our assessment before the Plan- ning Board. The Methodology Development process usually begins when the applicant (developer) contacts the City to discuss the proposed development. Prior to conducting any TIS, it is necessary for the devel- oper and the City staff to agree to a methodology to establish the minimum technical responsibili- ties and analyses that will be required. It is FTE's experience that the involvement of the reviewer in this phase is highly beneficial. However, if the methodology has been agreed to by the City prior to the reviewer's involvement, FTE will carefully review the agreed upon methodology and verify that all the expectations and requirements from the City are being met. Review of the Trip Generation —FTE will review the impacts based on the trip generation.Trip gen- eration involves estimating the number of trips that will be produced from or attracted to the pro- posed development. Based on the land use category, FTE will review that the trip generation calcu- lations were obtained based on the latest ITE's Trip Generation Manual. FTE will also check that the estimates obtained from this source are reasonable as they are based on national data and may not take into account special features that the local development may have. Additionally, the estimated trips could be reduced to derive net new external trips based on a multi- modal reduction, internal capture for multi-land use developments or pass-by-trips for retail devel- opments. FTE will also check for reasonableness of these reductions. Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 32 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Trip Distribution -The purpose of trip distribution is to allocate the trips generated to origin and destination traffic analysis zones. Trip distribution can be estimated using a number of different methodologies reflecting either model or manual methods, such as the latest Miami-Dade Long Range Transportation Plan Directional Trip Distribution Report, the Miami-Dade's MPO's adopted travel demand model (currently SERPM), existing traffic flows, or professional judgment. Whether a manual or modelling method is used, FTE will verify the reasonable- ness of the trip distribution process and that it is properly docu- mented and summarized in a figure that illustrates the percentage 4111' of total site trip generation that occurs in each zone. FTE will also verify that the distribution of external trips from the site adds up to 100%. Trip Assignment - Trip assignment involves determining the amount of traffic that will use each route on the roadway network and each access point to the propose site. Trip assignment deter- mines the number of site-generated turning and through movements at each intersection and road- way segment of the study area network. X241 2 FTE will verify that the trip assignment was performed JILL, Z236' J L r after analyzing the multiple paths between origins and °42A qtr • �� 4 • 17,^Street • destinations as well as driver tendencies and local 45a' all patterns in developing logical travel routes. For example: drivers have the tendency to use the first convenient Fest Food driveway, drivers may tend to use back/local connections L 1e estaurenr or major travel routes, restrictions such as left turns at 19 specific hours, etc. o � m a Trip assignment, by its nature, will reflect driver tenden- cies behavior; therefore the process can reflect a complex decision process. FTE will verify proper documentation of the assumptions and decisions made in developing the trip assignment. FTE will work proactively with the City staff and the developer's representative to ensure trip assignment assumptions are reasonable and reflec of local conditions. Travel Demand Growth - Background traffic serves as the base condition in determining the im- pacts of development on the transportation system in future years. It is comprised of two elements: natural growth, or the expected increase from overall growth in through traffic; traffic from other developments in the study area that have been approved but are not yet constructed or operation- al. FTE will work with the City staff to identify and verify that all the committed projects near the study area that could impact the travel patterns have been taken into account and that the growth rates estimated either by the historical trend analysis or using the Miami-Dade MPO's adopted trav- el demand model are reasonable and appropriate for the study area. Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 33 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Solicitation 4:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services Validate the traffic data collection - FTE will review all the data collected for the study. This in- cludes traffic volumes, geometry, signal timing, etc. FTE will verify that all traffic data was taken from new or recent counts, that they were collected on a typical week day, whether weekend counts are necessary (due to the unique characteristics of the City of Miami Beach), and whether counts near schools were collected while they were in session. FTE will also verify that all neces- sary traffic factors were applied to the field data as established in the FDOT's Project Traffic Fore- casting Handbook and that the data collection process is properly documented and included with- in the report. Field Observations - for each TIS, FTE will conduct a field review of traffic and circulation within the study area. The field visit will consist of driving the study area roadways and observing the study intersection operations during the peak commute periods. Field observations will help in identifying issues such as the effect of on-street parking, pedestrian and bicycle safety issues, sight distance problems, queuing and storage length, the effect on transit operations and truck routes, etc. The field visit date and time and its findings will be documented as part of the review process of the TIS. Operational Analysis - Operational analysis plays an important role of a complete TIS, . FTE's per review will serve to ensure that operational issues are not bypassed in the TIS. FTE will verify that the Level of Service (LOS) analysis is performed along each of the roadways and intersections identified in the methodology. The LOS analysis for the existing and future condi- tions will help determine whether the transportation system will operate acceptable with the ad- ditional site generated trips or if it is being deteriorated and mitigations are required. As part of the LOS analysis review, FTE will validate the micro-simulation models. FTE will verify that the simulation models were developed following the procedures outlined in the Highway Ca- pacity Manual and using the latest available and approved software (Synchro, etc.). FTE will verify that all the model inputs, including geometry, signal timing, volumes, etc., were entered correctly and that all model outputs are summarized and interpreted appropriately. In addition to the LOS analysis, FTE will review whether the preparer of the TIS has consider all op- erational constraints of the project. Some of the issues/constraints that FTE will be looking for as part of the operational analysis reviews are: • Need and/or adequacy of left-turn pocket storage capacity • Need and/or adequacy of right-turn storage capacity • Median island or channelization island movement restrictions • proposed layout of internal circulation • Proper access and circulation of the anticipated vehicle mix such as delivery trucks. This in- cludes the review of the computer generated vehicle turning path plans, and the review of proper access and circulation for service vehicles such as garbage trucks • Need and/or adequacy of acceleration/deceleration lanes Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) t: Page 34 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Solicitation#:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services • Residential neighborhood impacts W�SOU • Need for a new signal or stop signs and signal or stop sign 1 ♦; �. warrant study r . _ WAY%Alm 11 • Effect of signalization on existing signal coordination plans ,i s'"1 • Justification for and feasibility of any signal phasing or lane r _ �l configuration changes at intersections • Drive-through use your • Truck turning template analysis • Proper site access • Adequacy of the proposed driveways to serve project gen- ow erated traffic 1°[Il PT- Assessment of the parking operations - FTE will review all the details of the parking facility including the ingress, egress, and --mi — circulation within the parking facility. For valet parking opera- tions, FTE will verify that number of spaces proposed to stack u vehicles at the valet parking stands and that the required num- - -- ber of valet attendants are sufficient to ensure that the parking operations do not cause excessive stacking, waiting, or backups on to the public right-of way. Similarly,the operations plan for all mechanical parking or automated parking systems will be ana- lyzed to ensure that they satisfy the operational need of the project. FTE has had the opportunity to already review several of this mechanical parking systems proposed within the City of Miami Beach. FTE will review that the TIS identifies solutions and recommendations to address any issues or traffic impacts derived by the proposed development. Additionally, FTE's wide range of expertise allows us to consider the geometric components of the proposed layouts as well as to develop ad- ditional alternatives and offer comments on issues such as right-of way impacts and constructabil- ity. FTE brings to the City an experienced design team that is fully knowledgeable of, and experi- enced with, design procedures and requirements. Through years of experience, we have an under- standing of key challenges of typical civil engineering projects and are completely familiar with FOOT Plans Preparation Manual and the Design Standard Indexes. FTE will prepare for the City staff a memorandum with all the comments resulting from our review and will work diligently with the City staff and the developer to resolve all issues. FTE will make ourselves available to the City staff and the applicants to discuss and resolve any issues satisfacto- rily and in a timely manner so that the project can be presented to the Planning Board. Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) ". Page 35 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Solicitation ft:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services UNDERSTANDING The FTE Team consists of highly experienced personnel who have a proven track record of superior service. FTE's primary goal of this contract will be to coordinate with its professional team mem- bers in the support of the City. FTE has a successful history in meeting schedule and budget since we began. Our success and di- versity of services demonstrate we have completed our projects on time and within budget. Our contracts with public sector clients have defined services, fees, and contractual time for comple- tion. FTE relies on communication and effective leadership to reach our goal of bringing a project in on time and within budget. We are committed to following this philosophy to ensure the success of this contract. SCHEDULE The first step we must take is to meet with the client to collaborate on a project schedule. Once eve- ryone conveys all the peripheral elements of the project, we can begin to plan and implement a real- istic and workable schedule. Effective project schedules are created by determining every task re- quired for the project, what resources are necessary to complete the task, and how to execute each task. The task list is then prioritized with the interdependencies between the tasks identified and documented within the proposed project schedule. Every employee working on a project takes per- sonal responsibility in completing their portion of the task accurately and on time. We believe in documented accountability rather than the assumed accountability. We are very serious about our reputation as a firm in providing quality services. We will assure that appropriate resources are allo- cated to the contract. Resource allocation is key in ensuring that the project schedule stays on its course. BUDGET Our public sector contracts have been either lump sum or not to exceed fees. We are motivated to provide the contracted services within budget. Our quality control process has enabled FTE to re- main competitive. QUALITY CONTROL FTE has adopted a Quality Control Plan that uti- QUALITY CONTROL TRACKING STAMP lizes the principals in the Shewhart Cycle which was developed by Walter Shewhart, an Ameri Submittal Quality Control MaAwe can physicist, engineer, and statistician. FTE ex °Rw'"'`roMiLEAD PMOfESS101t#l(MearlrMxoMcl4rd Date panded on this model and created a plan that u+Eccolac MEvtEw►a«•«t-Yeakmmanich...chaos-IRA MIN allows one to develop Quality Control practices on a company wide scale and for specialized pro- concuRREncE.om TOR(Nue Pen•Chrcito.wm•atom„.,n) ate jects. This Plan consists of four phases: Plan, Do, Check and Act. FTE uses a Quality Control stamp C"A"GE lNcoaPOMATtaN(e1 w144"."f) carr to track and document the review process, simi- VEltItKATION(limen Pen Check or Green pen regnant) ate lar to that used by FDOT In-House Design staff. This is to be used on all project work, including Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) Page 36 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA City of Miami Beach 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES Solicitation 4:2014-116-SR Traffic Engineering Consulting Services studies, plans, reports, design documents, surveys, estimates, and calculations. It is very important to have the most qualified people in the checking process. They must know their role and schedule the time for their participation. An important step in the overall QA/QC process is documentation. We document the materials reviewed for each submittal, and retain all check prints, design memo- randa, reports, and calculations. The FTE Team will make our QC documents available to the client with each submittal, recognizing that the client may not require submittal of the QA/QC plans. This step assures that we are following the plan prepared at the onset of the project. Submitted By: Florida Transportation Engineering,Inc.(FTE) _.___ Page 37 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA "ENGINEERING FOR A WORLD 1N MOTION" WWW.FTEINC.NET DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA n /� I /� ' ' I B AC H H Procurement Department' v , /"�' �/ 1 1755 Meridian Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 www,miamibeachfl.gov EXHIBIT C Commission Memorandum for Issuance 1 RFQ No.2019-109-ND Addendum#1 10/17/2019 Coversheet Page 1 of? DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA KO, Competitive Bid Reports-C2 B MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jimmy L.Morales,City Manager DATE: September 11,2019 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2019-109-ND FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION The administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the issuance of RFQ 2019-109-ND for traffic engineering consulting services. ANALYSIS The Transportation Department manages a number of projects and services for which traffic engineering services are required, including but not limited to: analysis of proposed methodologies and site plans,trip generation studies, simulations,queueing and circulation studies,transportation plans,as well as any other required services within the traffic engineering discipline.Through this RFQ, the City seeks to create a pool of qualified firms that can expeditiously provide the City with traffic engineering consulting services when the need arises.The RFQ is issued pursuant to Section 287.055,Florida Statutes,which allows continuing contracts to pools of firms for future work providing that the assigned projects are for design services for projects less than$2 million or for studies less than$200,000. • SPECIFICATIONS. Please Reference, Appendix C, Page 19, RFQ 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services (attached). •SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. Please Reference Section 0300, Page 9, RFQ 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services(attached). •CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION. Please Reference Section 0400, Page 11, RFQ 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services(attached). Following the receipt of proposals an Evaluation Committee will review proposals in accordance with the criteria established in the RFQ. I am considering appointing the following individuals to serve on the Evaluation Committee: •Michael Belush,Chief of Planning and Zoning,Planning Department,City of Miami Beach •Josiel Ferrer-Diaz,Assistant Director,Transportation Department,City of Miami Beach •Rogelio Madan,Chief of Community Planning and Sustainability,Planning Department,City of Miami Beach •Doraida Rodriguez,Traffic Engineer III,Department of Transportation Public Works,Miami-Dade County I am also considering the following individuals as alternates: •Firat Akcay,Transportation Analyst,Transportation Department,City of Miami Beach -Alejandro Garavito,Senior Planner,Planning Department,City of Miami Beach CONCLUSION The City Manager recommends that the Mayor and Commission authorize the issuance of the RFQ 2019-109-ND for Traffic Engineering Consultant Services. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Ensure Comprehensive Mobility Addressing All Modes Throughout The City FINANCIAL INFORMATION It is not anticipated that grant funding will be utilized for this project. Legislative Tracking Transportation/Procurement https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=14412&Me... 9/13/2019 �.� Cnversheet Page 2 of DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA g ocu�-vi s OF xc nd „ 440„„..° "Pia Description n Draft RFQ https://miamibeach.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=14412&Me... 9/13/2019 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: PAGE 0100 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 2 0200 GENERAL CONDITIONS 5 0300 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS & FORMAT 8 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION 10 APPENDICES: PAGE APPENDIX A PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION and QUESTIONNAIRE 11 APPENDIX B "NO BID" FORM 16 APPENDIX C MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS & SPECIAL CONDITIONS 18 RFQ 2019-109-ND 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0100 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS 1. GENERAL. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Miami Beach, Florida(the"City"), as the means for prospective Proposer to submit their qualifications, proposed scopes of work and Statement of Qualifications (the "proposal") to the City for the City's consideration as an option in achieving the required scope of services and requirements as noted herein. All documents released in connection with this solicitation, including all appendixes and addenda, whether included herein or released under separate cover, comprise the solicitation, and are complementary to one another and together establish the complete terms, conditions and obligations of the Proposer and, subsequently, the successful proposer(s)(the"contractor[s]") if this RFQ results in an award. The City utilizes BidSync www.bidsync.com) for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment, including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through BidSync must register immediately with BidSync to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2. PURPOSE. The Transportation Department manages a number of projects and services for which traffic engineering services are required, including but not limited to: analysis of proposed methodologies and site plans, trip generation studies, simulations, queueing and circulation studies, transportation plans, as well as any other required services within the traffic engineering discipline. Through this RFQ, the City seeks to create a pool of qualified firms that can expeditiously provide the City with traffic engineering consulting services when the need arises. The RFQ is issued pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, which allows continuing contracts to pools of firms for future work providing that the assigned projects are for design services for projects less than $2 million or for studies less than$200,000. THIS RFQ, AND ANY RESULTING CONTRACT, IS ISSUED AND GOVERNED BY SECTION 287.055, FLORIDA STATUTES 3. SOLICITATION TIMETABLE. The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows: Solicitation Issued September 13, 2019 Pre-Submittal Meeting September 23, 2019 @ 10:00 a.m. ET Deadline for Receipt of Questions October 17,2019 @ 5:00 p.m. ET Responses Due October 28,2019 @ 3:00 p.m. ET Evaluation Committee Review TBD Proposer Presentations i TBD Tentative Commission Approval Authorizing Negotiations TBD Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 4. PROCUREMENT CONTACT. Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: Procurement Contact: Telephone: Email: Natalia Del•ado 305-673-7000 x6263 nataliadel•ado• miamibeachfl.•ov dditionally, the City Clerk is to be cosied on all communications via e-mail at: RafaelGranado• miamibeachfl.•ov; or via facsimile: 786-394-4188. 2 RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH The Bid title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence. All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0200-3. All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Proposers in the form of an addendum. 5. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S). Only if deemed necessary by the City, a pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s) may be scheduled. A Pre-PROPOSAL conference will be held as scheduled in Anticipated RFQ Timetable section above at the following address: City of Miami Beach Procurement Department Conference Room 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Attendance (in person or via telephone) is encouraged and recommended as a source of information, but is not mandatory. Proposers interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Submission Meeting via telephone must follow these steps: (1) Dial the TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1-877-873-8018 (Toll-free North America) (2) Enter the MEETING NUMBER: 6312925 Proposers who are interested in participating via telephone should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate via telephone. 6. PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS. Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Proposers are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect, including any information received at pre- submittal meeting or site visit(s). The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions. Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation. Addendum will be released through BidSync. Any prospective proposer who has received this RFQ by any means other than through BidSync must register immediately with BidSync to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ. Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal. Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 7. CONE OF SILENCE. This RFQ is subject to, and all proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Cone of Silence Requirements, as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein, including rendering their response voidable, in the event of such non-compliance. Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION. After proposal submittal, the City reserves the right to require additional information from Proposers (or Proposer team members or sub-consultants) to determine: qualifications (including, but not limited to, litigation history, regulatory action, or additional references); and financial capability (including, but not limited to, annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). 9. PROPOSER'S RESPONSIBILITY. Before submitting a response, each Proposer shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations, evaluations, and examinations, as it deems necessary, to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract. Ignorance of such conditions and requirements, DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA N1iAMi BEACF- and/or failure to make such evaluations, investigations, and examinations, will not relieve the Proposer from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract, and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Proposer. 10. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. 11. DETERMINATION OF AWARD. The final ranking results of the evaluation process will be considered by the City Manager who may recommend to the City Commission the Proposer(s) s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals. The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the scoring results identified herein and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369, including the following considerations: (1)The ability, capacity and skill of the Proposer to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Proposer can perform the contract within the time specified, without delay or interference. (3) The character, integrity, reputation,judgment, experience and efficiency of the Proposer. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5) The previous and existing compliance by the Proposer with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation. The City Commission may also, at its option, reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City, or it may also reject all Proposals. 12. NEGOTIATIONS. Following selection, the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Proposer. Notwithstanding the preceding, the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Proposer in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract. It is also understood and acknowledged by Proposers that no property, contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to; approved by the City; and executed by the parties. DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0200 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.GENERAL DISCLAIMERS. 5.COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LAWS. a.The solicitation referenced herein is being furnished to the recipient by the This RFQ is subject to,and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar City of Miami Beach(the"City")for the recipient's convenience.Any action with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 taken by the City in response to Proposals made pursuant to this solicitation, through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award pursuant ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform to such Proposals,or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or cancelling laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be without prescribed therein,including disqualification of their responses,in the event of any liability or obligation on the part of the City.In its sole discretion,the City such non-compliance. may withdraw the solicitation either before or after receiving proposals,may accept or reject proposals,and may accept proposals which deviate from the 6.CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS.Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-37379, solicitation, as it deems appropriate and in its best interest. In its sole the Proposer shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that discretion,the City may determine the qualifications and acceptability of any Code to the Procurement Division with its response or within five(5)days upon party or parties submitting Proposals in response to this solicitation. receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among b.The information contained herein is provided solely for the convenience of others,the conflict of interest,lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami prospective Proposers.It is the responsibility of the recipient to assure itself Beach and Miami Dade County. that information contained herein is accurate and complete.The City does not provide any assurances as to the accuracy of any information in this 7. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). Call 305-673-7490 to solicitation. Any reliance on these contents, or on any permitted request material in accessible format;sign language interpreters(five(5)days communications with City officials, shall be at the recipient's own risk. in advance when possible), or information on access for persons with Proposers should rely exclusively on their own investigations,interpretations, disabilities. For more information on ADA compliance, please call the Public and analyses. The solicitation is being provided by the City without any Works Department,at 305-673-7000,Extension 2984. warranty or representation,express or implied,as to its content,its accuracy, or its completeness.No warranty or representation is made by the City or its 8. POSTPONEMENT OF DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS. The agents that any Proposal conforming to these requirements will be selected City reserves the right to postpone the deadline for submittal of proposals and for consideration,negotiation,or approval. will make a reasonable effort to give at least three(3)calendar days written notice of any such postponement to all prospective Proposers through BidSync. c.Bidders are hereby advised that this solicitation is subject to the following ordinances/resolutions, which may be found on the City Of Miami Beach 9. PROTESTS. Proposers that are not selected may protest any website:http://web.miamibeachfl.qov/procurement/scroll.aspx?id=79113 recommendation for selection of award in accordance with the proceedings •CONE OF SILENCE—SECTION 2-486 established pursuant to the City's bid protest procedures, as codified in •PROTEST PROCEDURES—CODE SECTION 2-371 Sections 2-370 and 2-371 of the City Code(the City's Bid Protest Ordinance). •DEBARMENT PROCEEDINGS-SECTIONS 2-397 THROUGH 2-485.3 Protest not timely made pursuant to the requirements of the City's Bid Protest •LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE OF FEES-SECTIONS 2- Ordinance shall be barred. 481 THROUGH 2-406 •CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENDORS—SECTION 2487 10.JOINT VENTURES I SINGLE PURPOSE ENTITY. Joint Ventures are not •CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS—SECTION 2-488 allowed. Proposals shall be submitted only by the prime contractor.Proposals may, however, identify other sub-contractors or sub-consultants to the prime •FALSE CLAIMS ORDINANCE—SECTION 70-300 Proposer who may serve as team members. •ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS,FAVORS&SERVICES—SECTION 2-449 11. VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE. Pursuant to City 2.PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME.A person or affiliate who has been placed on the Code Section 2-374, the City shall give a preference to a responsive and convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crimes may not responsible Proposer which is a small business concern owned and controlled submit a proposal on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise. entity, may not submit a proposal on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit a 12. AGREEMENT BY BIDDERS. Any individual that submits a proposal in proposal on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or response to this solicitation agrees to the following: perform work as a contractor, supplier, sub-contractor, or consultant under a Any action taken by the City in response to Proposals made pursuant to this contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public solicitation,or in making any award,or in failing or refusing to make any award entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Sec. 287.017, for pursuant to such Proposals, or in cancelling awards, or in withdrawing or CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on cancelling this solicitation,either before or after issuance of an award,shall be the convicted vendor list. without any liability or obligation on the part of the City. 3.COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S LOBBYIST LAWS.This RFQ is subject The City may,at its sole and absolute discretion,reject any and all,or parts of to, and all Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with, all City any and all,responses;re-advertise this RFQ;postpone or cancel,at any time, lobbyist laws. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all City this RFQ process;or waive any irregularities in this RFQ,or in any responses lobbyist laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, received as a result of this RFQ. as prescribed therein, including, without limitation, disqualification of their responses,in the event of such non-compliance. Reasonable efforts will be made to either award the proposer the contract or reject all proposals within one-hundred twenty (120) calendar days after 4.DEBARMENT ORDINANCE:This RFQ is subject to,and all proposers are proposal opening date.In accordance with Section 47 below,a Proposer may expected to be or become familiar with, the City's Debarment Ordinance as withdraw its proposal after expiration of one hundred twenty (120) calendar codified in Sections 2-397 through 2-406 of the City Code. days from the date of proposal opening, by delivering written notice of withdrawal to the Procurement Department. 5 RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH with this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 13. COSTS INCURRED BY PROPOSERS. All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of Proposals,or any work performed in connection Where contractor is required to enter or go on to City of Miami Beach property therewith, shall be the sole responsibility(and shall be at the sole cost and to deliver materials or perform work or services as a result of any contract expense)of the Proposer,and shall not be reimbursed by the City. resulting from this solicitation,the contractor will assume the full duty,obligation and expense of obtaining all necessary licenses, permits, and insurance, and 14.RELATIONSHIP TO THE CITY. It is the intent of the City,and Proposers assure all work complies with all applicable laws.The contractor shall be liable hereby acknowledge and agree,that the successful Proposer is considered to for any damages or loss to the City occasioned by negligence of the contractor, be an independent contractor,and that neither the Proposer,nor the Proposer's or its officers,employees,contractors,and/or agents,for failure to comply with employees, agents, and/or contractors, shall, under any circumstances, be applicable laws. considered employees or agents of the City. 23.SPECIAL CONDITIONS.Any and all Special Conditions that may vary from 15. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY. In compliance with Chapter these General Terms and Conditions shall have precedence. 442, Florida Statutes, any toxic substance listed in Section 38F-41.03 of the Florida Administrative Code delivered as a result of this proposal must be 24.NON-DISCRIMINATION.The Proposer certifies that it is in compliance with accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet(MSDS)which may be obtained the non-discrimination clause contained in Section 202,Executive Order 11246, from the manufacturer. as amended by Executive Order 11375, relative to equal employment opportunity for all persons without regard to race,color,religion,sex or national 16. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right to origin. In accordance with the City's Human Rights Ordinance, codified in consider a Proposer's history of citations and/or violations of environmental Chapter 62 of the City Code,Proposer shall prohibit discrimination by reason of regulations in investigating a Proposer's responsibility,and further reserves the race,color, national origin, religion, sex, intersexuality,gender identity,sexual right to declare a Proposer not responsible if the history of violations warrants orientation,disability,marital and familial status,age,ancestry, height,weight, such determination in the opinion of the City. Proposer shall submit with its domestic partner status,labor organization membership,familial situation,and proposal, a complete history of all citations and/or violations, notices and political affiliation. dispositions thereof.The non-submission of any such documentation shall be deemed to be an affirmation by the Proposer that there are no citations or 25. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPETENCY. The City may consider any violations.Proposer shall notify the City immediately of notice of any citation or evidence available regarding the financial, technical, and other qualifications violation which proposer may receive after the proposal opening date and and abilities of a Proposer,including past performance(experience)in making during the time of performance of any contract awarded to it. an award that is in the best interest of the City,including: A. Pre-award inspection of the Proposer's facility may be made prior to the 17. TAXES. The City of Miami Beach is exempt from all Federal Excise and award of contract. State taxes. B. Proposals will only be considered from firms which are regularly engaged in the business of providing the goods and/or services as described in this 18. MISTAKES. Proposers are expected to examine the terms, conditions, solicitation. specifications, delivery schedules, proposed pricing, and all instructions C. Proposers must be able to demonstrate a good record of performance for pertaining to the goods and services relative to this RFQ. Failure to do so will a reasonable period of time, and have sufficient financial capacity, be at the Proposer's risk and may result in the Proposal being non-responsive. equipment,and organization to ensure that they can satisfactorily perform the services if awarded a contract under the terms and conditions of this 19.PAYMENT.Payment will be made by the City after the goods or services solicitation. have been received, inspected, and found to comply with contract, D. The terms "equipment and organization", as used herein shall, be specifications, free of damage or defect, and are properly invoiced. Invoices construed to mean a fully-equipped and well-established company in line must be consistent with Purchase Order format. with the best business practices in the industry,and as determined by the City. 20. COPYRIGHT, PATENTS & ROYALTIES. Proposer shall indemnify and E. The City may consider any evidence available regarding the financial, save harmless the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and its officers, employees, technical, and other qualifications and abilities of a Proposer, including contractors, and/or agents, from liability of any nature or kind, including cost past performance (experience), in making an award that is in the best and expenses for,or on account of,any copyrighted,patented,or unpatented interest of the City. invention, process,or article manufactured or used in the performance of the F. The City may require Proposer to show proof that it has been designated contract,including its use by the City of Miami Beach,Florida. If the Proposer as authorized representatives of a manufacturer or supplier,which is the uses any design,device or materials covered by letters,patent,or copyright,it actual source of supply. In these instances, the City may also require is mutually understood and agreed,without exception,that the proposal prices material information from the source of supply regarding the quality, shall include all royalties or cost arising from the use of such design,device,or packaging,and characteristics of the products to be supply to the City. materials in any way involved in the work. 26.ASSIGNMENT.The successful Proposer shall not assign,transfer,convey, 21. DEFAULT. Failure or refusal of the successful Proposer to execute a sublet or otherwise dispose of the contract,including any or all of its right,title contract following approval of such contract by the City Commission, or or interest therein, or his/her or its power to execute such contract, to any untimely withdrawal of a proposal response before such award is made and person,company or corporation,without the prior written consent of the City. approved, may result in a claim for damages by the City,and may be grounds for removing the Proposer from the City's vendor list. 27. LAWS, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. The Proposer shall obtain and pay for all licenses,permits,and inspection fees required to complete the work 22.MANNER OF PERFORMANCE.Proposer agrees to perform its duties and and shall comply with all applicable laws. obligations in a professional manner and in accordance with all applicable Local, State,County,and Federal laws,rules, regulations and codes. Lack of 28. OPTIONAL CONTRACT USAGE. When the successful Proposer is in knowledge or ignorance by the Proposer with/of applicable laws will in no way agreement,other units of government or non-profit agencies may participate in be a cause for relief from responsibility. Proposer agrees that the work and purchases pursuant to the award of this contract at the option of the unit of services provided shall be provided by employees that are educated, trained, government or non-profit agency. experienced, certified, and licensed in all areas encompassed within their designated duties. Proposer agrees to furnish to the City any and all 29.VOLUME OF WORK.To the extent applicable,it is the intent of the City to documentation, certification, authorization, license, permit, or registration purchase the goods and services specifically listed in this solicitation. However, currently required by applicable laws, rules,and regulations. Proposer further the City reserves the right to purchase any goods or services awarded from certifies that it and its employees will keep all licenses, permits, registrations, State or other governmental contracts,or on an as-needed basis through the authorizations,or certifications required by applicable laws or regulations in full City's spot market purchase provisions. force and effect during the term of this contract. Failure of Proposer to comply DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH 30.DISPUTES.In the event of a conflict between the documents,the order of Proposals without a contract award. Letters of withdrawal received after the priority of the documents shall be as follows: Proposal due date and before said expiration date, and letters of withdrawal A. Any contract or agreement resulting from the award of this solicitation; received after contract award will not be considered. then B. Addendum issued for this solicitation,with the latest Addendum taking 36.EXCEPTIONS TO RFQ.Proposers must clearly indicate any exceptions precedence;then they wish to take to any of the terms in this RFQ,and outline what,if any, C. The solicitation;then alternative is being offered. All exceptions and alternatives shall be D. The Proposer's proposal in response to the solicitation. included and clearly delineated,in writing,in the Proposal. The City,at its sole and absolute discretion, may accept or reject any or all exceptions 31. INDEMNIFICATION.The Proposer shall indemnify and hold harmless the and alternatives. In cases in which exceptions and alternatives are City and its officers,employees,agents and instrumentalities from any and all rejected,the City shall require the Proposer to comply with the particular liability, losses or damages, including attorney's fees and costs of defense, term and/or condition of the RFQ to which Proposer took exception to(as which the City or its officers,employees,agents or instrumentalities may incur said term and/or condition was originally set forth in the RFQ and any as a result of claims,demands,suits,causes of actions or proceedings of any exhibits or Addenda thereto). kind or nature arising out of,relating to or resulting from the performance of the agreement by the Proposer or its employees, agents, servants, partners, 37. ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS, FAVORS, SERVICES. Proposers shall not principals or subcontractors. The Proposer shall pay all claims and losses in offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or employee,or agent of the City,for the purpose of influencing consideration of actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, this Proposal. Pursuant to Sec.2-449 of the City Code,no officer or employee including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and of the City shall accept any gift, favor or service that might reasonably tend attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Proposer expressly improperly to influence him in the discharge of his official duties. understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by any agreement with the City or otherwise provided by the Proposer shall in no way 38. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. City reserves the right to request limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend the supplemental information from Proposers at any time during the RFQ City or its officers,employees,agents and instrumentalities as herein provided. solicitation process,unless otherwise noted herein. The above indemnification provisions shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Balance of Paste Intentionally Left Blank 32.FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW.Proposers are hereby notified that all Proposals including, without limitation, any and all information and documentation submitted therewith, are exempt from public records requirements under Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes,and s.24(a),Art.1 of the State Constitution until such time as the City provides notice of an intended decision or until thirty(30)days after opening of the proposals, whichever is earlier. Additionally, Proposer agrees to be in full compliance with Florida Statute 119.0701 including, but not limited to, agreement to (a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the public agency in order to perform the services; (b) provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the public agency would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law;(c)Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law;(d)Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the Proposer upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 33.OBSERVANCE OF LAWS.Proposers are expected to be familiar with,and comply with,all Federal,State, County,and City laws,ordinances,codes,rules and regulations,and all orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having jurisdiction or authority which,in any manner, may affect the scope of services and/or project contemplated by this RFQ(including,without limitation,the Americans with Disabilities Act,Title VII of the Civil Rights Act,the EEOC Uniform Guidelines,and all EEO regulations and guidelines). Ignorance of the law(s)on the part of the Proposer will in no way relieve it from responsibility for compliance. 34.CONFLICT OF INTEREST.All Proposers must disclose,in their Proposal, the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further, all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. 35. MODIFICATION/WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS. A Proposer may submit a modified Proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted Proposal up until the Proposal due date and time. Modifications received after the Proposal due date and time will not be considered.Proposals shall be irrevocable until contract award unless withdrawn in writing prior to the Proposal due date,or after expiration of 120 calendar days from the opening of DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0300 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1. SEALED RESPONSES. One original Proposal (preferably in 3-ring binder) must be submitted in an opaque, sealed envelope or container on or before the due date established for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, ten (10) bound copies and one (1) electronic format (CD or USB format) are to be submitted. The following information should be clearly marked on the face of the envelope or container in which the proposal is submitted: solicitation number, solicitation title, Proposer name, Proposer return address. Proposals received electronically, either through email or facsimile, are not acceptable and will be rejected. 2. LATE BIDS. Phase I Proposals are to be received on or before the due date established herein for the receipt of Bids. Any Bid received after the deadline established for receipt of proposals will be considered late and not be accepted or will be returned to Proposer unopened. The City does not accept responsibility for any delays, natural or otherwise. 3. NON-RESPONSIVENESS. Failure to comply with the following requirements shall result in a determination of non-responsiveness. Non-responsive proposals will not be considered. 1. Failure to submit a signed copy of Appendix A-1. 4. OMITTED OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. With exception of the Proposal Certification Form (Appendix A-1) and the Cost/Revenue Proposal, if applicable, the City reserves the right to seek any omitted information/documentation or any additional information from Proposer or other source(s), including but not limited to: any firm or principal information, applicable licensure, resumes of relevant individuals, client information, financial information, or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the Proposer to perform in accordance with contract requirements. Failure to submit any omitted or additional information in accordance with the City's request shall result in proposal being deemed non-responsive. 5. PROPOSAL FORMAT. In order to maintain comparability, facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of proposals, it is strongly recommended that proposals be organized and tabbed in accordance with the tabs, and sections as specified below. Hard copy submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references. Electronic copies should also be tabbed and contain a table of contents with page references. Cover Letter& Minimum Qualifications Requirements 1.1 Table of Contents. The table of contents should indicate the tabs, sections with tabs and page numbers to facilitate the evaluation committee's review. 1.2 Proposal Certification Form (Appendix A-1). Failure to submit the Proposal Certification Form with the Proposal shall result in Proposal being deemed non-responsive. 1.3 Questionnaire&Requirements Affidavit(Appendix A-2). TAB 2 Experience&Qualifications 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm. Submit detailed information regarding the relevant experience and proven track record of the firm and/or its principals in providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies. For each project that the Proposer submits as evidence of similar experience for the firm and/or any principal, the following is required: project description, agency name, agency contact, contact telephone & email, and year(s) and term of engagement. For each project, identify whether the experience is for the firm or for a principal (include name of principal). RFQ 2019-109-ND 8 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH 2.2 Qualifications of Proposer's Team. Provide an organizational chart of all personnel and consultants to be used for this project if awarded,the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein and each team members' qualifications. A resume of each individual, including education, experience, and any other pertinent information,shall be included for each team member to be assigned to this contract. TAB 3 Approach and Methodology Submit detailed information on the approach and methodology that the Proposer and its team has used in past engagements in providing the services described herein, including detailed information, as applicable, which addresses, but need not be limited to, its approach and methodology to the following: • Review of on-site and off-site vehicular circulation, including appropriate signage, striping, and valet parking operations at a minimum • Validate/assess travel demand growth based on the forecasted historical and long-range transportation plans • Validate micro-simulation runs to assess existing and future level of service conditions • Validate proposed roadway improvements to mitigate possible traffic impacts • Analyze ride-share vehicle operations and determine pick-up and drop-off locations • Determine the impact based on trip generation using the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation Manual for the proposed modifications/developments • Determine the applicable Transportation Demand Management(TDM)strategies and review the integration of such strategies into the project • Participate and attend meetings including attending a Planning Board hearing to respond to questions on the review of the traffic study • Assessment of valet parking operation based on mechanical parking or automated parking systems Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA MIAMI BEACH SECTION 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION 1. Evaluation Committee. An Evaluation Committee, appointed by the City Manager, may meet to evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the qualitative criteria set forth below. City staff will assign points for the quantitative criteria. It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee is advisory only and does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager or the City Commission. The results of Step 1 & Step 2 Evaluations will be forwarded to the City Manager who will utilize the results to make a recommendation to the City Commission. a. In the event that only one responsive proposal is received, the City Manager, after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFQ, may, without an evaluation committee, recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations. b. The City, in its discretion, may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee in the evaluation of proposals. 2. Qualitative Criteria. Responsive proposals shall be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria. Step 1 -Qualitative Criteria Maximum Points Experience and Qualifications 60 Approach and Methodology 40 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 1 POINTS 100 3. Quantitative Criteria. Following the results of the evaluation of the qualitative criteria by the Evaluation Committee,the Proposers may receive additional points,to be added by City staff, as follows. Step 2-Quantitative Criteria Maximum Points Veterans Preference 5 TOTAL AVAILABLE STEP 2 POINTS 5 4. Determination of Final Ranking. The sum of qualitative and quantitative scores will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Proposer Proposer Proposer A B C Ste. 1 Points 82 76 80 Committee Ste. 2 Points 22 15 12 Member 1 Total 104 91 92 Rank 1 3 2 Ste. 1 Points 79 85 72 Committee Ste. 2 Points 22 15 12 Member 2 Total 101 100 84 Rank 1 2 3 Ste. 1 Points 80 74 66 Committee Ste. 2 Points 22 15 12 Member 2 Total 102 89 78 Rank 1 2 3 Low Aggregate Score 3 7 8 Final Ranking' 1 2 3 RFQ 2019-109-ND 10 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX A M I AA Al Br Proposal Certification and Questionnaire & Requirements Affidavit RFQ No . 2019- 109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX Al -PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM This document is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM WITH ITS PROPOSAL SHALL RESULT IN THE PROPOSAL BEING DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 EXT.26263 NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.COM PROPOSERS NAME: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS: NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS): CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE NO.: TOLL FREE NO.: FAX NO.: FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT: ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.: Except as stipulated in General Condition 36, Proposer agrees: to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all specifications, attachments,exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto;to be bound, at a minimum, to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained herein or Addenda; that the Proposer has not divulged, discussed,or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal;that proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; that all responses, data and information contained in the proposal are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX A2-QUESTIONNAIRE AND REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT FORM The purpose of this Proposal Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposers of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,and to collect necessary information from Proposers in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated.Attach any requested information. Name of Proposer's Authonzed Representative: Title of Proposer's Authonzed Representative: Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: 1. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director,agent, or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%) percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse, parent,sibling, and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 2. References& Past Performance. Proposer shall attach at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 3. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non erformance by anpublic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 4. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA • .•! e .. 2. Effective January 1,2019, covered employees must be paid a living wage rate of no less than$11.70 per hour with health 3. Effective January 1, 2020, covered employees must be paid a living wage rate of no less than$11.78 per hour with health of Labor Statistics. Notwithstanding the preceding, no annual index shall exceed three percent (3%). The City may also, by portal,LCP Tracker(LCPTracker.net). - - YES NO 6. _ •• ., .. ... .. • •. .. e. .. . - A. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with spouses or to spouses of employees? YES NO 2. •• .•.. YES NO BENEFIT Firm-Provides-for Firm-Provides-for Faun-does-not Employees--with Em itch Provide Benefit Spouses Health Sisk-Leave Family-Medical Leave his designee. Approval is not guaranteed and the City Manager's decision is final. Further information on the Equal Benefits DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA 7. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375,the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi, as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375.Failure to agree shall result in proposal disqualification. YES NO 8. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements. The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, BidSync.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank DocuSign Envelope ID.4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX B " No Bid " Form RFQ No. 2019- 109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1 755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 Note: It is important for those vendors who have received notification of this solicitation but have decided not to respond, to complete and submit the attached "Statement of No Bid." The "Statement of No Bid" provides !the City with information on how to improve the solicitation process. Failure to submit a "Statement of No Bid" may result in not being notified of future solicitations by the City. DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Statement of No Bid WE HAVE ELECTED NOT TO SUBMIT A STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AT THIS TIME FOR REASON(S) CHECKED AND/OR INDICATED BELOW: Workload does not allow us to submit a proposal Insufficient time to respond _ Specifications unclear or too restrictive Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet service requirements _Unable to meet insurance requirements Do not offer this product/service OTHER. (Please specify) We do_do not_want to be retained on your mailing list for future proposals of this type product and/or service. Signature: Title: Legal Company Name: Note: Failure to respond, either by submitting a proposal or this completed form, may result in your company being removed from our vendors list. PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: NATALIA DELGADO STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS #2019-109-ND 1755 MERIDIAN AVENUE, 3rd FLOOR MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX C mIAAAIBEAri Minimum Requirements & Special Conditions RFQ No. 2019- 109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami Beach, Florida 33139 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA C1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements. Intentionally Omitted. C2.Special Conditions. 2.1 Term of Contract. It is expected that any resulting agreement shall be valid for a term of three (3) years from the effective date. The City Manager may approve two (2) additional one (1) year renewal periods based on satisfactory performance 2.2 Final Master Contract. Upon approval of selection by the City Commission, negotiations between the City and the selected Proposer(s) will take place to arrive at a mutually acceptable Master Agreement that will govern the terms and conditions of all future Consultant Service Orders (CSO)that may be issued for future projects. 2.3 Required Certifications. Project managers must be licensed Professional Engineers in the State of Florida. 2.4 Licensure.The Prime Proposer(Engineering Firm) shall hold a"Certificate of Authorization" by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations, as applicable. 2.5 Change of Project Manager. A change in the Consultant's project manager (as well as any replacement) shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager). Replacement(including reassignment)of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee(i.e. the City project manager). 2.6 Sub-Consultants. The Consultant shall not retain, add, or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager, in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution. Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub-consultants shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant. DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA ATTACHMENT C CONSULTANT'S RESPONSE TO THE RFQ De.-"L. C_.:...".._._ DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS DIVISION of ft# z . CORPORATIONS an official State of Florida website Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Previous On List Next On List Return to List Entity Name Search No Events No Name History Detail by Entity Name Foreign Profit Corporation HNTB CORPORATION Filing Information Document Number F92000000884 FEI/EIN Number 43-1623092 Date Filed 12/23/1992 State DE Status ACTIVE Principal Address 715 KIRK DRIVE KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 Changed: 04/28/2003 Mailing Address PO BOX 412197 KANSAS CITY, MO 64141 Changed: 03/29/1994 Registered Agent Name &Address COGENCY GLOBAL INC. 115 North Calhoun St. Suite 4 Tallahassee, FL 32301 Name Changed: 05/09/2012 file:///miamibeach.gov/.../Solicitations/2019/2019-109-ND_RFQ_Traffic_Engineering_Consulting_Services/15-%20Agreements/HNTB%20Corp.html[5/13/2020 4:11:52 PM] DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Address Changed: 07/07/2015 Officer/Director Detail Name&Address Title Director Hammond, Harvey K., Jr. 11414 WEST PARK PLACE, STE. 300 MILWAUKEE, WI 53224 Title Treasurer, Secretary DENSON, CRAIG W 715 KIRK DRIVE KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 Title Asst. Secretary Beshoner, Benjamin C. 715 KIRK DRIVE KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 Title Director Migneron, Chris 715 KIRK DRIVE KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 Title Director Yarossi, Paul A 350 Fifth Ave., 57th Floor New York, NY 10118 Title Asst. Secretary Staska, Scott H. 715 Kirk Drive Kansas City, MO 64105 Title Asst. Secretary Marcus, Chad E. 610 Cescent Executive Crt., Ste. 400 Lake Mary, FL 32746 Title President, Chairman, Director file:///miamibeach.gov/.../Solicitations/2019/2019-109-ND_RFQ_Traffic_Engineering_Consulting_Services/15%20Agreements/HNTB%20Corp.html[5/13/2020 4:11:52 PMI DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Slimp, Robert J. 191 Peachtree St., NE Ste. 3300 Atlanta, GA 30303 Title VP O'Grady, Thomas D 715 Kirk Drive Kansas City, MO 64105 Title VP Tomasini, Brandon R. 9601 McAllister Freeway, Ste. 1001 San Antonio, TX 78216 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2018 03/02/2018 2018 12/13/2018 2019 04/02/2019 Document Images 04/02/2019--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format J 12/13/2018--AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format J 03/02/2018—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/16/2017—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format J 03/23/2016--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/04/2015--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 09/05/2014--AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2014—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 12/10/2013—AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/29/2013—ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/09/2012--Reg. Agent Change View image in PDF format 03/19/2012--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2011 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2010--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/13/2009--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/21/2009--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/24/2008--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format tile:///miamtbeach.gov/.../Solicitatlons/2019/2019-109-ND_RFQ_Traffic_Engineering_Consuhing_Services/15-%20Agreements/HNTB%20Corp.html[5/13/2020 4:11:52 PM] DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 04/25/2007--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/17/2006--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/18/2005--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format J 04/27/2004--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format J 08/13/2003--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/28/2003--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/06/2002--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 07/02/2001 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/08/2000--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/23/1999--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/01/1998--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format J 04/16/1997--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/30/1996--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/18/1995--ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Previous On List Next On List Return to List Entity Name Search Searcn No Events No Name History Florida Department of State,Division of Corporations file:///miamibeach.gov/.../Solicitations/2019/2019-109-ND_REQ_Traffic_Engineering_Consulting_Services/15%20Agreements/HNTB%20Corp.html[5/13/2020 4:11:52 PM] DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-882862A08CDA MIAMIBEACH GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES • RF02019-109-ND INTB DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA rD 0 r (D rort 3 3 d 0 N _D SECTION 1 Cover Letter & Minimum Qualifications R DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 1 .1 Table oe of Contents Docovign Envelop.ID-4F5a2607-s4AA.F05.BICI.aa2aa2AOSCOA Ni.), • • °` COVER LETTER AND o t;� MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS • jt REQUIREMENTS v, immi Oo 28.2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS RE:NFO NO.2019409-N0,GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES Tab 1.Cover Letter and Minimum Qualifications Requirements Dam Me.Delgado, 1.1 Table of Contents.....__.__._.___._..._._.__._01 HNTB Corporation is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Miami Beach for the Miami Beach Traffic Engineering Consultant Services,Solicitation 2019-109-ND.HNTB understands and 12 Proposal Certification Form(A-I).__.___.____..03 is able to support you with an interdisciplinary team of expert professionals to provide quality reviews on a fast-tracked schedule.We understand the City's goals expressed in the request for qualifications and in response we have tailored a team of professionals who are committed to technical excellence and smart solutions. The HNTB team possesses a wide range of expertise in performing and reviewing both traffic and transportation tasks.We have supplemented our team with CALTRAN Engineering Group to Tab 2.Experience And Qualifications provide additional depth of resources for this project.We have practical and innovative solutions and the depth of resources to support and complete multiple assignments simultaneously 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm.._....__._. .35 within short time frames.Locally in South Florida.HNTB has provided and/or continues to provide similar study review services to the City of Miami,MiamrDade County Transportation and Public Works,Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO),Miami Dade Aviation Department,Broward County MPO and the Florida Department of Transportation Districts 4 and 6. 22 Qualifications of Proposer's Team._........_._.....42 HNTB prides itself on serving municipal,state and federal government as opposed to private entities which eliminates any conflict of interest both real and perceived. Tab 3.Approach And Methodology With this extensive study review experience.HNTB's team will hit the ground running with relevant,effective and efficient reviews drawing from their wealth of review experience.Our seasoned 30 Approach and Methodology._ ......................62 team will be led by our project manager,Rafiq Algasem,PE,PTOE,who has successfully managed several similar projects for many municipalities,including but not limited to the City of Miami Beach.Miami,Coral Gables,Doral,Homestead,Fort Lauderdale,Oakland Park,Sunrise and Lauderhill.Rafiq is very familiar with the challenges facing the City and the concerns of its residents and is extremely knowledgeable of the City's transportation system.He may assign certain review tasks or subtasks on this project to the appropriate review expert on the team but Rafiq will be personally involved on each and every assignment in coordinating,reviewing and ensuring each task order receives quality review and is delivered on time and within budget. HNTB;protect team offices are located in Downtown Miami,a 20-minute drive from Miami Beach City Hall and we will be available at short notice to meet with City staff when requested and to attend various Board meetings as necessary. We pledge our full commitment to help Miami Beach ensure quality reviews on time and within budget,as well as develop innovative ideas to ensure safer and better operating traffic conditions to your full satisfaction while serving as your trusted consultant. Sincerely, 4 Gus Pego,PE Principal-in-Charge HNTB Corporation TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICE.I RFO 8019-109-N0 1 / ir rI,y lc •■ Ili ,ted T- :k• d ,- .`�.I 4 le .111";:-V-.1.•- '' _09 !COME BENCH V k�I. AY- it' .A7 f � 1111 .. ill I�+X } :lIIii��jl - is i F�AI7I.� � -!- }�P YDS A7 I f - I - ,;,,in. ..'77t�tYYi L iii4r • • _ ` VA. 5!3. 1 y,. I r ,,i f i-/ _f. --V--%,,,, _ il prq T • ,I , , ; -!i_� 11 - •: a ."7-, E!i r;� lot a - 1 - „ - Li 1 iii _1 fit!\ .5 L s�- i �'Ii.. _ t. _ . ren-c, , ;-t ` ' '� s ' II T+ -.1�. � 1� ': pg t, 'r • sit" �•> IIP ,j: c '.SNR ... a >�. , _1 " 4 p, A - , • i• i 111 f + +lF ms's `�i 777 r.i. .TY .L. a-: 4. 2 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICER I R/02019-lO9-RD DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 1 .2 Pr r i •ica •ion Form 0 osa e (Appendix A-1 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F582607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX Al -PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM This document is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and executed. FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION FORM WITH ITS PROPOSAL SHALL RESULT IN THE PROPOSAL BEING DEEMED NON-RESPONSIVE. ' Solicitation No: Solicitation Title: RFQ 2019-109-ND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES Procurement Contact: Tel: Email: NATALIA DELGADO 305-673-7490 EXT.26263 NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.COM PROPOSER'S NAME: HNTB Corporation NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS: 105 years NO.OF YEARS IN BUSINESS LOCALLY: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: 65 years 4531 OTHER NAME(S)PROPOSER HAS OPERATED UNDER IN THE LAST 10 YEARS: N/A FIRM PRIMARY ADDRESS(HEADQUARTERS):715 Kirk Drive CITY: Kansas City STATE: MO ZIP CODE: 64105 TELEPHONE NO.: (816)472-1201 TOLL FREE NO.: N/A FAX NO.: N/A FIRM LOCAL ADDRESS:161 NW 6th Street,Suite 1000 CITY:Miami STATE: FL ZIP CODE: 33136 PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS ENGAGEMENT:Gus Pego,PE ACCOUNT REP TELEPHONE NO.: (305)551-8100 ACCOUNT REP TOLL FREE NO.: N/A ACCOUNT REP EMAIL: gpego@HNTB.com FEDERAL TAX IDENTIFICATION NO.:43-1623092 Except as stipulated in General Condition 36, Proposer agrees: to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document, inclusive of this solicitation, all specifications,attachments, exhibits and appendices and the contents of any Addenda released hereto; to be bound, at a minimum, to any and all specifications,terms and conditions contained herein or Addenda; that the Proposer has not divulged,discussed, or compared the proposal with other Proposals and has not colluded with any other proposer or party to any other proposal;that proposer acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws; that all responses, data and information contained in the proposal are true and accurate. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Gus Pego,PE Vice President Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: 4 Date: 10/25/2019 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 1 .3 Questionnaire Re uiremen s Affidavit ( A-2 ) DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA APPENDIX A2-QUESTIONNAIRE AND REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT FORM The purpose of this Proposal Certification, Questionnaire and Requirements Affidavit Form is to inform prospective Proposers of certain solicitation and contractual requirements,and to collect necessary information from Proposers in order that certain portions of responsiveness, responsibility and other determining factors and compliance with requirements may be evaluated.Attach any requested information. Name of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Title of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Gus Pego,PE Vice President Signature of Proposer's Authorized Representative: Date: 10/25/2019 1. Veteran Owned Business.Is Pro oser claiming a ran owned business status? YES vetNO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers claiming veteran owned business status shall submit a documentation proving that firm is certified as a veteran-owned business or a service-disabled veteran owned business by the State of Florida or United States federal government,as required pursuant to ordinance 2011-3748. 2. Conflict Of Interest.All Proposers must disclose, in their Proposal,the name(s)of any officer,director, agent,or immediate family member(spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Further,all Proposers must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposers must disclose the name(s) of any officer, director, agent, or immediate family member (spouse,parent, sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach. Proposers must also disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten(10%)percent or more in the Proposer entity or any of its affiliates 3. References & Past Performance. Proposer shall attach at least three (3) references for whom the Proposer has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: For each reference submitted, the following information is required: 1) Firm Name, 2) Contact Individual Name&Title,3)Address,4)Telephone,5)Contact's Email and 6)Narrative on Scope of Services Provided. 4. Suspension,Debarment or Contract Cancellation. Has Proposer ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by an u lic sector agency? YES NO SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: If answer to above is "YES," Proposer shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s). 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions.Proposers are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws, as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the City Code. Proposers shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with, and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of their Proposals,in the event of such non-compliance. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Submit the names of all individuals or entities (including your sub-consultants) with a controlling financial interest as defined in solicitation.For each individual or entity with a controlling financial interest indicate whether or not each individual or entity has contributed to the campaign either directly or indirectly,of a candidate who has been elected to the office of Mayor or City Commissioner for the City of Miami Beach. 6. Code of Business Ethics. Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23879,each person or entity that seeks to do business with the City shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics("Code")and submit that Code to the Procurement Department with its proposal/response or within five (5) days upon receipt of request. The Code shall, at a minimum, require the Proposer, to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among others,the conflict of interest, lobbying and ethics provision of the City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer shall attach its Code of Business Ethics. In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics, Proposer may submit a statement indicating that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics, available at http://www.miamibeachfl.Qov/city-hall/procurement/procurement-related-ordinance-and-procedures/ 4 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA care benefits of at least$2.71 per hour,or a living wage rate of no less than$11.14 per hour without health care benefits. Y-ES P!•9 8. _ .: .. contracts valued at over$100,000 whose contractors maintain 51 or more full time employees on their payrolls during 20 or more with the City of Miami Beach, who arc awarded a contract pursuant to competitive proposals, to provide"Equal Benefits"to their YES N8 B. Does your company provide or offer access to any benefits to employees with(same or opposite sex)domestic partners*or to Y€S NO- BENEFIT 9BENEFIT Firm Provides for Firm Provides for Firm does not Employees-1A4 Employees-444 Provide-Benefit Spouses Domestic Partners Health Sick L ave Family-Medisal-Leave Bereavement Leave providers in your area willing to offer domestic partner coverage) you may be eligible for R asonable Measures compliance. To GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 5 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA 9. Public Entity Crimes. Section 287.133(2)(a), Florida Statutes,as currently enacted or as amended from time to time, states that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity;may not submit a proposal,proposal,or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit proposals, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor,or consultant under a contract with any public entity;and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees to the requirements of Section 287.133, Florida Statutes, and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list.Failure to agree shall result in roposal disqualification. YES NO 10. Non-Discrimination. Pursuant to City Ordinance No.2016-3990, the City shall not enter into a contract with a business unless the business represents that it does not and will not engage in a boycott as defined in Section 2-375(a)of the City Code, including the blacklisting, divesting from,or otherwise refusing to deal with a person or entity when such action is based on race, color, national origin,religion,sex,intersexuality,gender identity,sexual orientation,marital or familial status,age or disability. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2-375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code.Failure to agree shall result' proposal disqualification. YES NO 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or Services from North Carolina and Mississippi. Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375,the City of Miami Beach, Florida, prohibits official City travel to the states of North Carolina and Mississippi,as well as the purchase of goods or services sourced in North Carolina and Mississippi. Proposer shall agree that no travel shall occur on behalf of the City to North Carolina or Mississippi, nor shall any product or services it provides to the City be sourced from these states. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Resolution 2016-29375.Failure to agree shall result in proposal disqualification. I YES NO 12. Fair Chance Requirement. Pursuant to Section 2-376 of the City Code,the City shall not enter into any contract resulting from a competitive solicitation,unless the proposer certifies in writing that the business has adopted and employs written policies,practices, and standards that are consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance,set forth in Article V of Chapter 62 of the City Code("Fair Chance Ordinance"),and which,among other things,(i)prohibits City contractors,as an employer,from inquiring about an applicant's criminal history until the applicant is given a conditional offer of employment; (ii)prohibits advertising of employment positions with a statement that an individual with a criminal record may not apply for the position, and (iii) prohibits placing a statement on an employment application that a person with a criminal record may not apply for the position. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT: Proposer certifies that it has adopted policies, practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance. Proposer agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request. Proposer further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract,and shall entitle the City to the immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition to any damages that may be available at law and in equity.Failure to agree shall result in pro osal disqualification. YES NO 13. Acknowledgement of Addendum. After issuance of solicitation, the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation which may provide additional information to Proposers or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every Proposer having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system, PublicPurchase.com. However, Proposers are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the Proposer has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation. Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Initial Confi Initial to Confirm Initial to Confirm ceip Receipt _ Receipt 1) Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 6 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA QUESTIONNAIRE & REQUIREMENTS AFFIDAVIT strategies to minimize impact on Key Biscayne traffic. HNTB (APPENDIX A-2) worked hand-in-hand with the Village, City of Miami, Miami- 1. Veteran Owned Business. HNTB Corporation is not a Dade County and police during the three-day festival to adjust veteran owned business. and adapt traffic operation,circulation and parking to minimize the intense traffic impact. This effort was hailed as a success 2. Conflict of Interest. HNTB Corporation does not have any beyond residents and media expectations. conflicts of interest with the City of Miami Beach. d. Broward County Metropolitan Planning Organization 3.References&Past Performance. James Cromar,Strategic Initiatives Deputy Executive Director a. City of Miami Beach 100 West Cypress Creek Road,Fort Lauderdale,FL 33309 Josiel Ferrer-Diaz,PE,Assistant Director (954)876-0038;cromarj@browardmpo.org 1688 Meridian Avenue,Suite 801,Miami Beach,FL 33139 Scope of Services Provided: HNTB has studied the location (305)673-7000,Ext.6831;josielferrer@miamibeachfl.gov for several mobility hubs with the goal of creating multimodal Scope of Services Provided: Under the current planning and transit-oriented mobility hubs that facilitate and encourage traffic engineering contract, HNTB has performed several the use of sidewalks,bicycles and transit.HNTB's role includes tasks including, reviews of traffic studies. The City of Miami reviewing all existing studies, planned developments, planned Beach requested HNTB review the Bayshore Neighborhood future improvements and then developing plans to encourage traffic calming study to address cut-through traffic during transit-oriented developments and multimodal transportation Art Basel and identify potential solutions. Additionally, a new to reduce the dependency on personal vehicle use. traffic circle was developed by HNTB to improve safety and operation at the intersection of Chase Avenue and W. 34th e. Seminole Tribe of Florida Street. Finally, HNTB studied two schools in Miami Beach and Dave Miller,Senior Vice President recommended safety improvements consisting of geometric 6363 Taft Street,Suite 309,Hollywood,FL 33024 and operational changes. (954)5855652;dave.miller@seminolehardrock.com Scope of Services Provided: Seminole Tribe of Florida has b. City of Miami been redeveloping the Hollywood Gaming facility through Collin Worth,Bicycle Coordinator and Transportation Analyst the addition of hotel rooms, a convention facility and new 444SW2Avenue,8thFloor,Miami,FL33130 entertainment venues, including a concert stage, beach (305)416-1022;cworth@miamigov.com resort,restaurants and retailers.HNTB assisted in quantifying Scope of Services Provided: HNTB has reviewed development traffic impacts, estimated the need for parking, as well as traffic impact studies on an on-going basis for the City of Miami recommended geometric and operational improvements, since 2013.In 2016,HNTB was reselected and continues in this including a potential new interchange with Florida's Turnpike. capacity assisting the City as it goes through tremendous redevelopment growth.This contract will continue through May f. Miami-Dade Expressway Authority 2022.Reviews completed include data collection and analysis, ClaudioDiaferia,Deputy Director of Engineering parking, safety enhancements, geometric, maneuverability 3790 NW 21 Street Miami,FL 33142 within and around proposed development, parking need and (305)637-3277 X2113;cdiaferia@mdxway.com provisions,parking queuing including valet when present. Scope of ServicesProvided:HNTBhasbeenservingasthegeneral transportation consultant for the Miami-Dade Expressway c. Village of Key Biscayne (MDX)Authority since 2010.HNTB reviews all studies for system Andrea Agha,Village Manager improvements to address safety and operational deficiencies 88 West McIntyre Street,Suite 210,Key Biscayne,FL 33149 prepared by other consultants, including traffic, safety and (305)365-5514;aagha@keybiscayne.fl.gov operational. HNTB then recommended improvements to Scope of Services Provided: Key Biscayne selected HNTB mitigate concerns. Additionally, HNTB has also conducted to assist in reviewing the 2019 Virginia Key Ultra Festival traffic operational and safety studies on MDX facilities. proposed traffic circulation, parking, shuttle bus operation, taxis and Transportation Network Companies (Uber and Lyft) access locations and other safety, geometric and operational GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 7 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Miami-Dade County Transportation and Public Works 6. Code of Business Ethics.HNTB Corporation is committed Kiranmai Chirumamilla,Principal Planner to full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, 701 NW 1st Court,Suite 1500,Miami,FL 33136 whether imposed by local,state,federal or other governmental (786)469-5283;kiranmai.chirumamilla@miamidade.gov authority. HNTB requires all employees to be honest, ethical Scope of Services Provided: HNTB has an on-going contract and lawful in conducting HNTB's business. Employees must that includes performing and reviewing various types of comply with all applicable laws, regulations and professional engineering studies. One of the reviews being conducted by canons in the performance of their duties at HNTB.Employees HNTB is the Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Development are expected to be knowledgeable regarding the laws, and Environment Study which includes traffic conditions for regulations and professional canons applicable to their position the alternatives being considered. and duties.No one has the authority to approve illegal activity and such behavior cannot be justified because it was directed q. Florida Department of Transportation District4 or requested by a superior. If a request for improper action Zoryana Fedyushko,Quality Assurance Coordinator is received, it should be reported to HNTB's Business Integrity 3400 West Commercial Boulevard,Fort Lauderdale,FL 33309 Office,even if the request is declined.Employees are encouraged (954)777-4329;zoryana.fedyushko@dot.state.fl.us to seek guidance from the Business Integrity Office if they are Scope of Services Provided:HNTB reviews a series of task-work uncertain about the legality of any conduct. HNTB employees orders for the Districtwide Plans Review contract, including must comply with this policy and report any violations. See traffic signalization plans, maintenance of traffic and signing attached Code of Business Ethics on following pages. and pavement markings. 7. Living Wage.Not applicable per RFQ 2019-109-ND. h. Florida Department of Transportation District 6 Javier Rodriguez,PE,TSMSO Program Engineer 8. Equal Benefits for Employees with Spouses and 1001 NW 111 Avenue,Miami,FL 33172 Employees with Domestic Partners. Not applicable per RFO (305)640-7307;javier.rodriguez2@dot.state.fl.us 2O19-1O9-ND. Scope of Services Provided: HNTB supports the Department in developing and advancing the TSM&O program. Our team is 9. Public Entity Crimes. No additional submittal is required responsible for developing the TSM&O strategic plan; TSM&O per RFQ 2019-109-ND. mainstreaming presentations and outreach material;coordinating activities of the District 6TSM&O team with Central Office and other 10. Non-Discrimination. No additional submittal is required regional agencies and stakeholders;developing and implementing per RFQ 2019-109-ND. the districtwide signal retiming initiative; and overseeing the districtwide work zone/maintenance of traffic support initiatives; 11. Moratorium on Travel to and the Purchase of Goods or and Keys COAST Connected Vehicle Pilot project. Services from North Carolina and Mississippi.No additional submittal is required per RFQ 2019-1O9-ND. 4. Suspension, Debarment Or Contract Cancellation. HNTB Corporation has never been debarred,suspended or other legal 12. Fair Chance Requirement. No additional submittal is violation,or had a contract canceled due to non-performance required per RFQ 2019-109-ND. by any public sector agency. 5. Vendor Campaign Contributions. Not applicable. HNTB 13. Acknowledgment of Addendum. HNTB Corporation Corporation(including subconsultants)agrees to the expectation acknowledges sole responsibility for assuring receipt of all to be or become familiar with, the City's Campaign Finance addendum issued pursuant to solicitation. HNTB Corporation Reform laws,as codified in Sections 2-487 through 2-490 of the has received all addendum(s)released by the City pursuant to City Code.HNTB shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all this solicitation and noted signature in Appendix A-2. applicable provisions of the City's Campaign Finance Reform laws are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions, as prescribed therein,including disqualification of our proposals, in the event of such non-compliance. 8 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2O19-1O9-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA ATTACHMENT 6. CODE OF BUSINESS ETHICS CODE OF INTEGRITY :INTB GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 9 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO For more than 100 years,our clients,communities,and employees have experienced firsthand that HNTB is a company of integrity.It is a cornerstone of the HNTB Vision and essential to the continued success of our business.In fact,our ability to reach our goal of being the dominant U.S.transportation firm hinges on our reputation and integrity. We set exceptionally high standards and expect honesty and integrity from our employees in everything we do.And in turn,employees have expected the same from HNTB.It's one of the reasons many professionals come to work with us. Through our Business Integrity program,we carry those expectations forward with our Code of Business Integrity.This code,a natural outgrowth of HNTB's Vision and core values,does not replace our Core Integrity Policies;it strives to give an overview of our Business Integrity philosophy and summarizes our policies in easy-to-read understandable language,using real-life examples.We hope you will use it as a resource for information and guidance. It's vital that each of us remember that we are all responsible for HNTB's reputation. We are all accountable for honest and ethical behavior and simply doing the right thing. This is what has made HNTB an industry leader and a place where we all are proud to work. Rob Slimp Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 10 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 GUIDANCE AND REPORTING 6 PERSONAL INTEGRITY 7 LAWFUL AND ETHICAL CONDUCT 7 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND NO HARASSMENT 7 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 8 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 8 WORKPLACE VIOLENCE 9 DRUG ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM 9 USE OF TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES 9 EMPLOYEE PRIVACY 10 PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE 10 INTEGRITY IN BUSINESS MATTERS 11 PROTECTION OF ASSETS 11 CONFIDENTIAL AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OWNERSHIP 12 HONESTY IN BUSINESS DEALINGS 13 ACCURATE RECORDS AND FINANCIAL REPORTS 14 RECORDS RETENTION 14 TIMEKEEPING AND EXPENSE 14 INTEGRITY IN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS 16 GIFT GIVING 16 GIFT RECEIVING 17 BRIBERY AND KICKBACK PROHIBITION 18 PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 18 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 19 COMPANY LOBBYING 20 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND ACTIVITY 20 COMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT INTEGRITY 21 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONDUCTING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 23 FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT 23 EXPORT CONTROLS 24 ECONOMIC SANCTIONS 24 ANTIBOYCOTT LAWS AND REGULATIONS 25 COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS 25 Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 11 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA HNTB Vision Doctrine Sustalnablllty Strategic planning and implementation Leadership development Differentiating competitive advantage:Discover-Deliver Profitable Growth Client focus Unity of purpose Focus on relationships Optimizing sales,revenue,earnings,cash Continuous improvement Best Business Technical excellence and innovation Provide a learning environment Sophisticated business practices Communications A clearly understood,effective organization Consistent Delivery 4 for 4: Quality work On time On budget To the client's satisfaction on every project Philosophy ■ Take personal responsibility for making success happen • Expect more of yourself in everything you do • Discover what is really important in any situation • Collaborate for the benefit of everyone • Build relationships Culture ■ Integrity is Technical excellence is Respect for others • Continual development of all employees • Commitment to our professions Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 12 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA INTRODUCTION WHAT IS THE CODE OF BUSINESS INTEGRITY? The Code of Business Integrity has been created as an outgrowth of HNTB's core values and the HNTB Vision.The Code acts as the cornerstone of HNTB's commitment to conduct business with the highest standard of integrity in everything we do.It is a tool that brings ethics and compliance together to complement the culture HNTB has developed for more than 100 years. Your hands and mind You should use the Code as a resource when you need information make HNTB's mark or guidance in making a decision.It is designed to alert you to on the community. situations where you may need to obtain guidance.The mere fact that But it's your heart something might be legal doesn't always mean it is the ethical thing and commitment to do.Remember,however,the Code does not address every subject that spark our or situation,nor can it address every rule,law or policy.If you have a reputation. question or need additional guidance,please refer to HNTB's Intranet LIVE THE where the full policies and procedures are published or contact the HNTB VISION Business Integrity Office,your Division Human Resources Director or your supervisor. AS AN EMPLOYEE, WHAT ARE MY RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE CODE OF BUSINESS INTEGRITY? HNTB's success depends on our reputation.As an employee of HNTB,you are required to read,understand and follow our Code and the underlying policies and procedures.If you have a question about whether or not you are doing the right thing or making the right decision,you should seek guidance from the Code,your supervisor,Human Resources or the Business Integrity Office.Any suspected violations of the Code should be reported in accordance with guidelines discussed later. If you are a supervisor,you are expected to lead by example,living up to the standards set forth in the Code.This includes providing guidance to employees, supporting those who report violations,and never taking or allowing retaliation against an employee for reporting a suspected violation. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 13 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA DECISION MAKING If you are unsure if you are doing the right thing—ask yourself the following: HOW DOES THE HOTLINE WORK? • Is my action in line with HNTB's values? Below are answers to frequently asked questions about HNTB's Integrity Hotline: • Would I want to read about my action on the front page of a morning newspaper or as an Internet headline? • The hotline is open 24/7. • Would I feel comfortable telling my family or my • It is staffed by third-party supervisor about my action? specialists. HNTB does not • Calls are not screened retaliate against • Would I feel confident explaining my action to a or recorded those who government investigator? - report concerns • Would my client react negatively if he or she found • There is no caller ID. in good faith. out about my action? • You have the option to remain • After taking such action,could I sleep at night? anonymous.If so,you will receive a unique ID number GUIDANCE AND REPORTING to guarantee your anonymity. .. We all have a duty to report actual or suspected • HNTB prohibits retaliation violations of laws,regulations or the Code of Business against any employee who Integrity.If you become aware of misconduct,suspect reports a violation in it may be occurring or have a question about what good faith. is the right thing to do,you may contact any of the following resources: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? After you have called HNTB's Integrity Hotline,a • Your supervisor—if not directly involved in summary of your conversation will be delivered to the issue HNTB's Business Integrity Office within 24 hours. • Your Division Human Resources Director If you prefer anonymity,you do not need to provide your name and other identifiers.Upon receipt of that • HNTB Business Integrity Office report,the Business Integrity Office will work to fully • HNTB Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or investigate your report and take appropriate action. www.hotline-services.com CODE VIOLATIONS Officers and leadership personnel who become aware Violations of the Code of Business Integrity will be of an allegation must immediately report the situation subject to disciplinary action,including termination. to Human Resources,the Business Integrity Office In some instances,violations may be severe enough or the HNTB Integrity Hotline.For more information that HNTB might be required to report them to the please see the Integrity Reporting Policy. proper authorities,which may lead to civil and/or criminal liability. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 14 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA I PERSONAL INTEGRITY • When it comes to HNTB's integrity and reputation,everyone is held to the highest ethical standards.Nothing justifies unethical conduct. Integrity is about doing the right thing in every situation.If you know it is wrong,don't do it.If you are in doubt,ask.Each of us has a responsibility to do the right thing and set an example of honesty and respect for others and compliance with the various laws that govern HNTB and its employees. Everyone is encouraged to contribute to our growth and success.One of our greatest strengths is having the right people in the right positions. We achieve this by striving to provide a work environment where all team members have the opportunity to reach their full potential and contribute to HNTB's success.HNTB is dedicated to supporting a culture of diversity and inclusion. LAWFUL AND ETHICAL CONDUCT HNTB is committed to full compliance with all applicable laws,regulations and professional canons.We require all employees to be honest,ethical and lawful in conducting HNTB's business.As an HNTB employee,you are expected to understand and follow all laws,regulations and professional canons applicable to your position and duties.This includes HNTB's policies and procedures.There is no tolerance for illegal activity at HNTB;no one,including your superiors,has the authority to approve or direct it.For additional information,see our Lawful and Ethical Conduct Policy. Remember— This policy is 24/7— PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND NO HARASSMENT Professional conduct Everyone wants and deserves a workplace where they are respected and does not end when appreciated.HNTB strives to create an environment that is free from harassment you leave work at and unprofessional conduct so that each employee is afforded the opportunity to the end of the day. If perform to the best of his or her ability.Because of this,HNTB will not tolerate you go to dinner with anyone engaging in harassing or unprofessional behavior;this includes,but is not limited to,unacceptable conduct by employees,managers,supervisors,clients, industry colleagues, subconsultants and vendors.In some instances,what might be considered offensive remain professional. and harassing to one individual may not be to another.As a representative and Your actions are a employee of HNTB,you must use good judgment and professionalism to avoid any reflection of HNTB no appearance of unsuitable or inappropriate behavior.We expect our leaders and those matter what situation with management responsibilities to lead by example and to act professionally and you are in. with integrity at all times. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.orq/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 15 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Harassment is a form of discrimination and has no will not experience retaliation for making a good place at HNTB.Harassment can come in all forms, faith report.For additional information,see our including an oral statement,written statement, Professional Conduct and No Harassment Policy. Harassment physical act or even maintaining a hostile work has no place environment.Conduct that may be considered sexual EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY harassment includes unwelcome sexual advances, HNTB strictly prohibits discrimination against any at HNTB. Help requests for sexual favors and other verbal or physical of support and conduct of a sexual nature that is unwelcome. employee color,or applicanton,gender,for enational origin,because b maintain an race, religion, national disability, Some examples of harassment are: citizenship status,marital status,age,genetic environment information,sexual orientation,veteran status or any free from . Emailing inappropriate jokes to your co-workers other status protected by federal,state or local law harassment. that include improper references to race,religion, Employment decisions such as hiring,transfers, sexual orientation or gender promotions,training,terminations,compensation, • Offensive language or slurs benefits and other terms of employment must always Bullying or teasing be based on the employees'qualifications,experience, • competence and performance,and not on the Whether you are the person being harassed or an individual's protected characteristics. observer of the harassment,you have an obligation If you know or suspect that to report it to your supervisor,Human Resources, discriminatory behavior the Business Integrity Office or the HNTB has taken place,report it - Integrity Hotline.As an observer it is your personal immediately to your supervisor, responsibility to help support and maintain an Human Resources or the HNTB ~ 0 environment free from harassment.Ignoring behavior Integrity Hotline.You will will not make it go away nor is ignorance a defense. not experience retaliation for - , HNTB provides the proper channels for this behavior making a good faith report. . , to be reported,and you can remain anonymous.You For additional information, , see our Equal Employment fj '1 Opportunity Policy. .,• `- oQuestion OCCUPATIONAL An HNTB employee is working on a project where she is in the same office with the client.One of the client's project managers routinely SAFETY AND HEALTH _______________________ comes up to her and rubs her shoulders when she is working at her The well-being of people desk.She doesn't want to jeopardize HNTB's relationship with the client, employed at HNTB is a major but the project manager's behavior is making her uncomfortable.What priority both in the office and at should she do? the work site.HNTB recognizes that it has a primary 0 Answer responsibility to prevent accidents by demonstrating HNTB does not tolerate this type of behavior,whether from an HNTB a genuine commitment to safety.HNTB is dedicated employee or a client.The HNTB employee should either let the client's to achieving high safety performance in its project manager know she Is uncomfortable with this behavior and operations and minimizing risk through continuous that their relationship is strictly professional or she should discuss improvement. with her supervisor and/or Division HR Director or contact the Business Integrity Office. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 16 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA HNTB believes that a safe work environment and WORKPLACE VIOLENCE strong safety program helps us secure business,recruit As part of HNTB's commitment to employees' the best talent and preserve our exceptional workforce. well being and safety,there is zero tolerance for Maintaining a safe work environment includes workplace violence.Violent behavior and dangerous At HNTB, everything from keeping your cubicle free of fall weapons have no place at HNTB.Employees who safety is hazards and wiping up a spill on the lunchroom floor, are violent or make threats of violence will be everyone's to ensuring the proper safety harness is worn during a disciplined accordingly including termination. responsibility. bridge inspection.An accident can happen anywhere For additional information,please see our at any time.Maintaining a safe work environment Workplace Violence Policy. and being aware of potential hazards is everyone's responsibility. DRUG AND ALCOHOL-FREE WORKPLACE Drug and alcohol abuse can pose a serious threat to Another safety issue that has taken on increased the safety,health,morale and productivity of HNTB. importance the last few years is the risks associated HNTB's policy is to maintain a drug-free workplace. with text messaging,emailing or using smart All HNTB employees must strictly comply with devices while driving.The federal government company policies regarding the abuse of alcohol and now bans contractor employees from such activity the possession,sale and use of illegal substances or when performing any work for or on behalf of the face disciplinary action.This can include termination government.The ban applies to all vehicles,whether of employment.For additional information on our owned by the government,HNTB or a private Drug Abuse and Alcoholism Policy and Employee individual.If you need to use a PDA(personal digital Assistance Program(EAP),including reporting assistant)while driving,pull your vehide over to the requirements,please contact your Division Human side of the road or into a parking lot before doing so. Resources Director. For additional information,see our Occupational Safety and Health Policy,contact HNTB's safety Alcohol may,at times,be served responsibly at director or go to our intranet HNTB Safety website company functions such as holiday parties,company to access HNTB's safety manual and safety fact sheets. picnics or social activities.Employees are expected to demonstrate reasonable and responsible use of alcohol at all company-related events,functions and situations, including industry dinners and other functions that may take place off HNTB premises. USE OF TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES HNTB relies on its vast computer and technology 0 Question resources to conduct business.These resources are to need need safety equipment to start working on a project.Is there any equipment that has been specified and if so,how do we get it? be used for legitimate business purposes only.As a convenience to employees,HNTB allows occasional 0 Answer personal use of its computer resources as long as The HNTB Safety Office has evaluated a large array of safety equipment such use does not interfere with the employee's that is listed on the HNTB Safety website for easy ordering.Safety job responsibilities or with any project or business equipment includes:hard hats,reflective vests,vehicle beacon lights, use,monopolize HNTB's technology resources or fall equipment,confined space equipment,safety eye wear,first aid kits, fire extinguishers,personal floatation devices,and more. violate any company policy Common sense and good judgment should govern both business and Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 17 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA personal use.Employees must remember,this use is This obligation also extends to each employee.You a privilege and,if abused,there will be disciplinary have an obligation to maintain the confidentiality of actions.Technology resources are company property; personal information you have access to based on as such,employees and other users waive all rights of your position or otherwise acquire.For example, privacy in anything they create,store,send or receive you cannot forward information that you obtain on HNTB's technology resources,which includes from HNTB's employee directory to anyone outside computers,servers,cell phones,Blackberries, of HNTB without permission of the HNTB employee. PDAs,etc. For additional information,see our Employee Privacy Policy. HNTB takes this very seriously and employs methods to monitor the content of what is being viewed, PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE sent,received or stored on HNTB's technology resources.Material that is fraudulent,embarrassing, All architects,engineers,planners and other sexually explicit,profane,obscene,intimidating, professionals must ensure that their professional defamatory or may be construed as harassment or license,registration and any other certification disparagement may not be sent by email or any other requirements have been met and are maintained in form of electronic communication(e.g.,bulletin board good standing as required by any jurisdiction having systems,newsgroups,chat groups,etc.)or be displayed authority over the work performed by that particular professional.As professionals,each of us is required to on or stored in HNTB's technology resources.HNTB also prohibits sharing this type of information by any uphold the integrity of our profession,which includes other means,such as by printing it out or showing respecting our ethical and moral obligations. it to another person on a computer monitor.Users encountering or receiving this kind of material should )Question immediately report the incident to their supervisor, An HNTB employee is transferred to a project to replace another Human Resources or to the Business Integrity Office. employee who recently left the company.The employee has a set of For additional information,please see our Use of plans in front of her that need to be signed and sealed on this project. Technology Resources Policy. Should she sign and seal the plans knowing she was not directly involved? EMPLOYEE PRIVACY 0 Answer HNTB respects the privacy of each employee.In the First,she should be aware of the laws in the state which govern the normal course of business,HNTB may obtain certain project and her license,and know where to go to research.If the state information of a private or confidential nature.HNTB licensing laws say no,she should not sign and seal the plans.Violating will take steps to maintain the confidentiality of such state licensing laws will not only put HNTB at risk,but it also puts your employee information,consistent with privacy laws individual license at risk.You are responsible to know and practice the and business needs.HNTB,however,retains its right expected ethical conduct associated with your professional registration. to obtain and use confidential employee information when the company believes it to be necessary or appropriate,in accordance with sound judgment and You should never feel pressure to do something good business practice. unethical or illegal;this includes pressure from your superiors,peers and clients.Illegal and unethical activity puts everything and everyone at risk.When in doubt,contact your supervisor,your Division HR Director or the Business Integrity Office. For additional information,see our Professional Licensure Policy. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 18 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA " 0 INTEGRITY IN BUSINESS MATTERS It is important that we all work together to conduct business honestly and with the highest integrity.Everyone is expected to be truthful in all dealings.This includes everything from billing time to preparing a Respect HNTB's proposal.Not only must we be honest in our record keeping,but also assets. We are mindful of protecting assets,whether tangible or intangible. all responsible PROTECTION OF ASSETS for our Protecting HNTB's assets is everyone's responsibility.HNTB is committed to continued the efficient and proper use of HNTB assets and resources and those of our success. clients,subconsultants and business partners.HNTB prohibits theft and/or misappropriation of property. This applies not only to physical property,such as equipment and materials,but also to intangible property,such as data,information systems and software.Further, because of U.S.controls on the export of information,even giving someone who is not authorized access to HNTB systems can result in violations of U.S.law. 0 Question An employee is in charge of buying gift cards for a special recognition program at HNTB.In doing so,the employee decides to buy an extra gift card for herself, believing that doing so is harmless and knowing that no one will ever know.Is this improper? 0 Answer Yes.This is a direct violation of company policy.Don't make the mistake of thinking something is proper if it will go unnoticed or may slip through the cracks. Not only is buying the gift card for herself unethical,it also is illegal.It is your responsibility to do the right thing,even when you think no one is looking. 0 Question An employee is going on a business trip to Florida and decides to take his family along.In doing so he has booked a more expensive room and ordered more from room service.On other areas of the trip,he cuts back on his expenses,so that the total amount of the trip is in line with what he otherwise would have spent.He later decides to add those extra,family-related expenses to his expense report,reasoning that there was no net cost to HNTB.It is just a few hundred dollars,what can it hurt? 0 Answer Not only is this a violation of company policy,it is an illegal act.The fact that the overall cost was not unreasonable does not justify billing HNTB for non- business expenses. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com i http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 19 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Prohibited conduct can include anything from • Proposals improper management of business expenses to • Contractual agreements intentional physical damage or destruction of property. The Q&A scenarios on the previous page are obvious • Financial documents Have a doubt violations of HNTB policyand are considered about what is Litigation matters unethical.In some circumstances,however,employees allowable?Ask may not be sure if an expense is allowable.If in doubt, • Pay and employment practices your supervisor ask your supervisor or contact the Business Integrity • Personnel files or contact the Office for further assistance. Business Integrity Work in progress Office for assistance. If you observe or become aware of the • Completed work that is covered by a client HNTB consistently misappropriation of HNTB assets or theft,you have confidentiality agreement a personal responsibility to report it.HNTB will monitors expenses. not retaliate against anyone who in good faith • Architectural and engineering drawings,plans reports misappropriation of HNTB assets or theft. and designs For additional information,see our Protection of • Technology,know-how,methodologies,patentable Assets Policy. information,copyrightable information and trade secrets CONFIDENTIALITY AND INTELLECTUAL An important part of HNTB's success is dependent PROPERTY OWNERSHIP upon its ability to develop and use proprietary HNTB is committed to protecting the proprietary and information and protect its intellectual property. confidential information of HNTB and its clients,as Intellectual property consists of our technologies, well as other parties'information in our possession methodologies,patents,trademarks,trade secrets, or that we have access to.Employees are expected to software and copyrights—our know-how that gives protect this information and not disclose it to third us our competitive edge.There are two common parties both during misperceptions regarding intellectual property: Lesson Learned and after employment with HNTB. I. Assuming a client owns the intellectual property related to HNTB's deliverables simply because it A client provided HNTB with a rendering that Proprietary or paid for the deliverables. was created by another consultant.The confidential client asked that we make our design look information of HNTB The client only owns the hard copy deliverables. like the rendering.HNTB honored the client's is an important asset HNTB owns all intellectual property developed on request and made some aspects of the that we do not want to company time or with company resources unless it design look like the rendering.The consultant give away.Examples is a"works made for hire"or we assign it to a client who originally created the rendering filed a of proprietary or third party under a contract. copyright infringement lawsuit against HNTB. and confidential 2. Assuming a client has a license to use intellectual Employees are required to verify the client information of HNTB property it provides to HNTB. either owns or has a license to use any include nonpublic materials or information the client or another information such as: If we use someone else's intellectual property in the party provides to HNTB.If we do not,we may performance of our services and we do not have • Marketing and be involved in an infringement claim. a written license to use it,HNTB can be sued for business plans infringement.Proper contract language can mitigate • List of clients this risk to HNTB. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 20 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA There are special considerations when Intellectual Property is used for a federal client or developed 0 Dilution under a U.S.government contract.HNTB is required An employee has created software on his own time with his own to include special language in our proposal on these resources.Does he have to assign those rights over to HNTB? projects.Please consult the director of Intellectual 0 Answer Property for additional guidance. No-as long as it was not created on HNTB's time or with HNTB's resources,the inventor retains the ownership.The HNTB Intellectual For additional information,see our Confidential and Property and Confidentiality Agreement that you signed when you were Intellectual Property Ownership Policy or go to hired does not address invention activities done entirely on your own time HNTB's Intellectual Property website. and entirely with your own money and resources. HONESTY IN BUSINESS DEALINGS HNTB is committed to conducting all business learn that one of these events has occurred,we must with the highest degree of integrity.This applies follow the Mandatory Disclosure Rule and disclose to everyone.This expectation what we have discovered to the U.S.government includes being truthful in all immediately.If you feel that a false claim has occurred dealings.HNTB employees and disclosure is required,you must contact the should never make a false or Business Integrity Office immediately for further Everyone fraudulent statement;cover guidance.Violations of the FCA and/or failures makes mistakes. • ' up a material fact or use a to disclose can result in contract termination and Choosing to do document knowing it contains debarment from future government contracting.It can the right thing '' I, any materially false,fictitious or even result in civil and/or criminal action being taken in response to fraudulent statement or entry. against HNTB and its employees.HNTB will disclose the mistake is 1 any intentional or unintentional false claim to the what integrity is There will be instances where appropriate authorities. all about. Do the a statement has been made,in • good faith,and the statement is Even though the guidance above on false claims right thing and 1 _. - later found to be false.In such an relates to U.S.government contracts,HNTB expects gain respect. instance,HNTB may need to take the same diligence and truthfulness from every \ ""t,.. 00.111 immediate action to rectify the employee on every project regardless of a client's rules mistake by taking the appropriate and regulations. steps to correct the record with respect to the false What is a"claim"under the False Claims Act?A statement.This cannot occur unless HNTB is notified claim is an invoice,proposal,certification,even your promptly whenever an employee discovers such a timecard.HNTB expects everyone to have honesty situation. and integrity in all business dealings. This expectation extends further in complying with Other examples of false reporting and the False Claims Act(FCA)when working with misrepresentation include: the U.S.government.In accordance with this act, we cannot submit a false claim for payment,make - You state a contract change will be significant when materially false,fraudulent or inaccurate statements, it actually will have minimal impact conceal or omit a material fact or knowingly retain an - You realize you accidentally overbilled a client and overpayment received from the U.S.government.If we don't do anything about it Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 21 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA - You make a false certification statement,such as RECORDS RETENTION on an Organizational Conflict of Interest or Small The intent of HNTB's Records Retention Policy is to Business Certification ensure that all records necessary for business and legal It is important to remember that a violation of this reasons will be retained for a period of time that will policy could result in severe consequences including reasonably assure their availability when needed,but financial loss and exdusion from future projects.Dont for no period of time longer than reasonably necessary be afraid to come forward and disclose an error or If you receive an HNTB directive that documents honest mistake.Submitting a cost associated with a in your possession are relevant to an investigation, change order in good faith and later discovering it is litigation or an audit,follow the guidelines set forth technically inaccurate is an honest mistake.Disclosure the notification and do not destroy,alter or conceal of the error will most likely gain respect from the any document covered under the notification.For client.It keeps HNTB's reputation of integrity in the additional information,please see our Records marketplace intact.For additional information,please Retention Policy. see our Honesty in Business Dealings Policy. TIMEKEEPING AND EXPENSE ACCURATE RECORDS AND Truthful and accurate timekeeping and expense FINANCIAL REPORTS reporting provides for consistent and fair treatment HNTB's records and financial reports are used by of costs for the firm's stakeholders:employees,clients HNTB leaders,individual shareholders,the ESOP and shareholders. Trustee,HNTB lenders and independent analysts in The full and proper Timekeeping Rules evaluating HNTB's financial capabilities and results. recording of hours worked It is critical that they remain uncompromised.All and expenses incurred are - Record all time spent for the benefit of HNTB employees must be truthful in recording and everyone's responsibility. the company or a client on a daily basis. reporting their financial transactions. HNTB is committed to its stakeholders to accurately — Record authorized time and expenses This includes everything from individual accounting accurately and in accordance with law transactions,such as charging to an inappropriate account for all labor and and the HNTB Policies. account,misrepresenting an expense item in order to expenses on projects and draw less attention to it or to make it more palatable overhead activity in order - Obtain appropriate approval for hours to leadership and/or external personnel(client staff or to fairly pay employees for and expenses incurred and resolve any valuation experts),to making inaccurate statements their labor and appropriately questions with supervisor. or assertions that could influence our stock price. invoice the client for services No employee should ever feelpressured to alter received.Employees are - When corrections are warranted,they accountable for reporting must be appropriately documented, financial data for any reason not related to actual approved and resolved. time and expenses that financial performance. honestly reflect their costs incurred on behalf of the - Timely and thorough supervisory review Financial information,whether good or bad,must of employee timecards and expense be reported accurately and timely.For additional fine.The manager or reports assures complete and accurate information,please see our Accurate Records and supervisor is responsible business transactions. Financial Reports Policy. for review of timecards and expense reports to ensure — Resources:Manager or supervisor, that only approved expenses timekeeping policies,HNTB Business Integrity Office and Timecard Training. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 22 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA are included.Leadership must also promote an atmosphere in which issues,concerns and mistakes can be addressed in a fair and open manner. Compliance with HNTB Timekeeping and Expense Policies provide for: • Consistent and fair treatment of costs for employees,clients and stakeholders • Accurate timecards and invoices in accordance with contractual requirements and applicable laws and regulations • Overall integrity of the timekeeping and accounting systems • Sound cost information upon which 0 Question to base management decisions An HNTB employee was assigned to a project that required additional effort due to project issues and client deadline demands.She worked a For additional information,see our total of 55 approved hours for the week.However,there were only 40 Timekeeping and Expense Policy. hours of budget remaining.She recorded 40 hours for the project and donated the remaining hours,rationalizing that she could have been more efficient with her time.Has she appropriately accounted for her time? 0 Answer No.All time worked for the benefit of the company or a client must be recorded to maintain equity among stakeholders and support management's ability to assess the profitability of company operations. Q Question An HNTB employee just lost a very close family member in an auto accident.Her supervisor thought it would be nice to send flowers to the employee's home expressing his and her co-workers'profound sympathy. The supervisor ordered the flowers using a personal credit card.The price of the flowers,including tax and delivery,roughly equaled two hours of his HNTB wages.In order to not be burdened with filling out an expense report and having his boss approve it,the supervisor simply added two hours to his timecard that week(showing 10 hours worked on a day when he only worked 8 hours).He felt that he would receive the same amount of money by doing this as he would have had he submitted an expense report.Are his actions appropriate? 0 Answer No.This is not an honest representation of costs incurred and is in direct violation of HNTB policies.He also may have violated a variety of laws and regulations.Even though he assumed the company would"come out even",it does not make it right. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com j http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 23 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA ' INTEGRITY IN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS In order to continue building and maintaining HNTB's reputation of integrity and quality,HNTB expects all employees to conduct business with the highest integrity and ethical standards.This includes respect There are for our clients and other third parties we work with,as well as respect hundreds of for HNTB. government BUSINESS GIFTS AND GRATUITIES jurisdictions, and their laws and GIFT GIVING regulations are all Business courtesies and gratuities can help facilitate the building of and maintenance different. HNTB of business relationships.HNTB expects all employees to use good judgment when has resources offering a business courtesy or gratuity.The reason for offering the business courtesy t0 tell you what or gratuity should be transparent and the value moderate.If a gift,gratuity,meal the rules are. or entertainment is offered to clients or potential clients to influence their business Ignorance is decisions,it is against HNTB policy.Offering gifts,gratuities, entertainment and meals is generally discouraged in other settings n0 excuse. as well,but in the rare instance where it is deemed appropriate,it should be of nominal value,infrequent and unsolicited.Gifts of cash or cash equivalents are strictly prohibited. t; '' HNTB employees should never give or offer a business courtesy or gratuity that: • Could be perceived as a conflict or appear to give an unfair business advantage • Gives an appearance of impropriety or may cause embarrassment to HNTB or the recipient • Violates applicable laws or regulations 4141/4•4( 41 1.7 0 Question You unexpectedly run into a client at a professional society meeting and want to extend an invitation to have lunch,but you haven't had the opportunity to review the rules in advance.What do you do? 0 Answer Do not offer to buy lunch at that time.You can let the client know that you would like to buy lunch,but that you are uninformed of the applicable rules and that you would be happy to buy next time,if allowed. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 24 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA HNTB employees must also recognize that government employees are governed by strict rules 0 Question and regulations relating to the acceptance of gifts and A vendor offers a few HNTB employees tickets to a local minor league gratuities.It is important to know that paying for a baseball game to sit with the vendor and some other clients in a suite. government employee's lunch or dinner is usually Is it proper for the employee to go? considered a gift.If a government employee accepts 0 Answer such a gift,it could jeopardize his or her job.In some In most cases,yes,the vendor will be present along with other clients jurisdictions,it is against the law for immediate of the vendor.There would be no appearance of impropriety,as it is an family members of HNTB employees to give gifts opportunity for you to develop legitimate business relationships and and gratuities to certain government officials and discuss business. employees. HNTB works with hundreds of public sector clients. Before offering a gift or taking a dient to lunch,it is Wh Question What if the vendor and other clients will not be present? Is it still best to know the specific laws that pertain to the client proper for the HNTB employees to accept the tickets? by contacting the HNTB government relations staff 0 Answer or by going to the intranet under Market Sectors& No,there is no legitimate business purpose and it would give the Services/Government Relations and you will be given appearance of the vendor offering an unfair business advantage. information on these restrictions,including a login and password to a law firm that advises us of specific state and local laws on gift giving. GIFT RECEIVING No business courtesies,gifts and gratuities may be The same rules apply for gift receiving.HNTB offered or given to federal officials and employees or employees should never accept a gift that is in foreign government officials and employees.If you are violation of applicable laws or regulations or could be contemplating taking an action that may be contrary perceived as a conflict of interest.In general,do not to this direction,you must discuss the matter with the accept a gift if it: Business Integrity Office before taking the action. Where foreign officials and employees are concerned, Compromises or appears to compromise sound the FCPA policy provisions noted later in this Code business judgment need to be scrupulously followed. • Is given by the gift giver in the expectation of some Remember,some private sector clients also have strict kind of return favor gratuity rules and policies and gift giving or lunch • Compromises your ability to perform your job in buying may be viewed as a conflict of interest by an effective and objective manner these clients. • Gives an unfair business advantage Say thank you with 4for4.The best way to show your • Is cash or a cash equivalent-e.g.gift cards appreciation is to perform your work to the best of your ability.Deliver quality services on time,on • Has a fair market value of$100 or more in any one budget and to the client's satisfaction.For additional instance or totals more than$300 in the course of a information,see our Gift Giving Policy. year from any one vendor,unless you have approval from your supervisor and office leader to do so Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 25 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F582607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA If the gift seems inappropriate,it probably is.If you • A prime contractor pays us only a portion of our fee are offered a gift,gratuity or entertainment,including and keeps the rest as an administrative surcharge meals,it must relate to HNTB's legitimate business. without the consent of the federal client For additional information,see our Gift Receiving A perceived Policy. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST conflict of BRIBERY AND KICKBACK A conflict of interest occurs when an activity,financial interest can interest or relationshipinterferes withprofessional PROHIBITIONS be just as HNTB and its employees must not engage in judgment and objectivity.Conflicts of interest are not damaging to unusual,especially in large companies.A conflict of our reputation bribery or kickbacks of any kind whatsoever.HNTB p interest is not necessarily unethical,as long as it is employees are prohibited from offering,giving, as the existence soliciting or receiving anything of value or from identified early in the process and correctly reported of an actual as a possible conflict.No one should ignore the bestowing or receiving any kind of favored treatment possibility that a conflict of interest is present or may conflict. when interacting with government personnel, be perceived to be present.With timely disclosure and foreign government officials,prime contractors or resolution,conflicts are not subcontractors(either directly or through third always negative. parties)for the purpose of obtaining or retaining Example business.Such actions are illegal,unethical and against As discussed below,there are HNTB's values. two distinct types of conflicts An HNTB employee's father owns an of interest—personal actuarial consulting business.The While most of us understand what a bribe is,a conflicts of interest and employee is in charge of hiring and paying kickback is less well understood.The federal Anti- organizational conflicts a consultant to assist with a project and Kickback Act prohibits HNTB and its employees from of interest. she feels her father's business would be accepting,soliciting or offering bribes,kickbacks the best choice.However,she knows if or any other form of improper payment made in PERSONAL she hires him,others would perceive her order to obtain a contract,commercial benefit or CONFLICTS OF decision as a personal conflict of interest. other favorable consideration or treatment.Under INTEREST She decides to take herself out of the the act,the term"kickback"means any money,fee, hiring process and asks her supervisor, commission,credit,gift,gratuity,thing of value or A personal conflict of an unbiased third party,to interview the compensation of any kind that is provided, interest occurs when an candidates and make the final decision. directlyor indirectly,to anyindividual or entityfor HNTB employee has a The supervisor hires the employee's father y financial interest,personal because he is the best candidate for the the purpose of obtaining or rewarding favorable job,based on merit,qualifications and activity or relationship treatment in connection with a contract or other cost.The supervisor also agrees to review commercial benefit. that could impair,or could and approve invoices submitted by the reasonably be perceived to actuarial business. Any violation of this policy may subject HNTB and impair,the employee's ability the offending employee to harsh criminal and civil to act impartially and in This is a positive example of how to penalties.For additional information,see our HNTB's or the client's best disclose and successfully mitigate a Bribery and Kickback Prohibitions Policy. interest.The conflict exists personal conflict of interest.The other because the individual is or option is to completely eliminate the Examples of a kickback include: could be influenced by his or personal conflict of interest by removing • An entity promising to award HNTB business only her own personal interests or the father as a candidate due to an if we are willing to give them a cut appearance of impropriety. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 26 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA relationships when making decisions on behalf of in pursuing a particular project;performing services HNTB.It doesn't matter that a situation didn't actually on one job that might prohibit us from proposing on influence your judgment,what matters is what a another job;serving two clients in competition with reasonable observer might conclude. each other;and working for a contractor client while If it doesn't feel quite right,it probably isn't and you representing the owner in another project involving that contractor.All of these potential conflicts can be should reach out to your supervisor or the Business mitigated and managed to the client's satisfaction if Integrity Office for guidance.Disclosure is key when identified early and disclosed timely. it comes to perceived or actual conflicts of interest. Your job will not be in jeopardy if you disclose a Potential organizational Examples personal conflict of interest,and conflicts of interest WNW HNTB will work with you to should be identified mitigate or eliminate the conflict. early in the pre-proposal HNTB hires an engineer that worked for If you do not disclose,however, stage.At that time HNTB the company that drafted an RFP we -� are now proposing on.In this scenario, — your employment with the can evaluate whether or HNTB would have an unfair competitive rk company could be jeopardized, not a conflict is present advantage if that engineer provided as could HNTB's ability to be and how we can still HNTB RFP information that only he/ PO. MI, awarded future contracts.For pursue the job and she would know as a former employee additional information,see our determine next steps. of the company,information that is not .- Personal Conflict of Interest In most cases,if caught available to the public and could give -.1.441 Policy. early,an organizational us the knowledge needed to win the lir conflict of interest can be job.In this instance,it may be possible ORGANIZATIONAL disclosed and properly to successfully mitigate the conflict by CONFLICTS resolved.At the first putting an ethical wall in place that would iiil OF INTEREST sign ofanorganizational prevent the engineer from disclosing such !r* information to HNTB or assisting with the An organizational conflict of conflict of interest, proposal in a way that could be perceived interest occurs when a circumstance,relationship contact the Business as a conflict. or event impairs or is perceived to impair HNTB's Integrity Office for ability to perform work impartially and objectively or assistance.For additional ves HNTB an unfair business advanta e A conflict information,please see our HNTB has the opportunity to pursue gl g a$25,000 task order from FEMA to of interest,especially if undisclosed,can preclude Organizational Conflict evaluate a hurricane damaged bridge. I-INTB from competing for projects,or worse case, of Interest Policy. At the same time another office is in lose a project in which we are already involved. discussions with the state DOT about An organizational conflict of interest is not always Common misperceptions: designing that same bridge for a$25 negative.With timely disclosure to the client and other • Organizational conflicts million fee should FEMA provide funding affected parties,HNTB can work to mitigate and avoid of interest only pertain for its replacement. Atc this point HNTB the conflict,allowing HNTB to remain on the job. to the federal market. needs to evaluate the ont ,RFP language and client organizationalact There are many scenarios where HNTB can be in False,all levels of conflict of interest policies to ensure a position where an actual,potential or perceived government now have that proper disclosures are made and conflict exists.These include hiring client personnel regulations preventing mitigation procedures are implemented. or competitor personnel who possess information that organizational conflicts We don't want a potential conflict to could give HNTB an unfair competitive advantage of interest. preclude us from the$25 million fee. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.orq/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 27 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Example . If I bring a potential laws can result in civil and criminal penalties for both The son of a fairly high-ranking conflict of interest to employees and the company. Department of Transportation official my client's attention,it has just completed his second year of will make him angry. Because each jurisdiction sets its own lobbying a civil engineering program at the local We have found that registration and disclosure requirements,employees university and he is seeking a summer disclosure increases must understand and comply with all lobbying laws internship.During a casual conversation, the client's trust in for each jurisdiction before undertaking any covered the DOT official informs you that her son HNTB and confirms lobbying activity.In some jurisdictions,employees is looking for summer work,and that hemay be required to register as a lobbyist before making our reputation of high has an interest in HNTB.You have met the a single contact with a public official. Employees who son before,and he has a pleasant attitude integrity and ethical have questions should contact HNTB Government and you know that he is an excellent standards. Relations personnel.Summaries of regulations and student. You agree to do what you can for • As long as I tell someone laws for many jurisdictions are available on the him.Could this be considered a"business within the client's HNTB Government Relations intranet site.For influencing"action or conflict of interest? organization about the additional information,please see our Company If the end result is a job with HNTB,the conflict of interest and Lobbying Policy. answer is yes,it could have an appearance he/she says it isn't a of a conflict of interest that could give conflict,we don't need POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS HNTB an unfair competitive advantage to worry about it.Not AND ACTIVITY when pursuing work with the DOT client. true,you must alert a HNTB encourages all employees to exercise their It is also something that could embarrass decision-maker within individual rights to vote and to support political HNTB and the DOT official if it was the client's organization, candidates or parties. discovered by and reported someone who has the in the media. authority to approve a Local,state and federal laws may impose restrictions waiver of the conflict. on campaign activity by employees during business hours and/or when you arc charging time to HNTB. COMPANY LOBBYING In addition,many jurisdictions prohibit or limit the HNTB employees who seek to influence the actions of use of company resources to support a candidate or a public employees and elected officials must understand ballot initiative.No company funds,assets,property or and comply with all"lobbying"laws.Broadly defined, other things of value will be loaned or made available "lobbying"may include any activity that urges a to any party,committee or candidate unless such public official to take some action or make a certain activities are allowed under relevant laws. decision.Both HNTB and individual employees may HNTB's PAC and employees often make decisions on be responsible for publicly disclosing details of their which candidate to support based on the candidate's lobbying activities.Employees who exceed certain public policy positions,including support for lobbying thresholds may also be required to register infrastructure projects.However,employees should as lobbyists. be careful not to make a campaign contribution in an Lobbying is a legal activity.However,employees who attempt to influence or thank a public official for any seek to influence government action must be aware of specific government vote or action. and comply with all applicable lobbying laws in their The HNTB PAC may legally make campaign relevant jurisdiction.Violations of lobbying contributions under strict circumstances.Only Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 28 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA designated officers of the HNTB PAC may authorize COMPLIANCE WITH a contribution from the HNTB PAC.Approval by PROCUREMENT INTEGRITY PAC officials must be obtained before making any While many of our clients may have specific commitment to contribute on behalf of the HNTB requirements pertaining to procurement integrity,the PAC.Employees who wish to contribute to the HNTB federal government requires HNTB to comply with PAC may do so on a voluntary basis.No coercion or the Procurement Integrity Act.The intent of this law Any contributions discriminatory treatment may attempt to influence is to protect the federal agency procurement process, from the PAC or or retaliate against an employee who chooses not to specifically by ensuring government business is corporate funds participate in the HNTB PAC.Any contributions conducted in a manner above reproach,with complete from the PAC or corporate funds must be approved impartiality and no preferential treatment.The act must be approved in advance. has two parts,the first being disclosure of confidential in advance. Some jurisdictions may also have and source selection information.The second being "pay-to-play"laws which prohibit employment or compensation discussions with U.S. or restrict personal contributions government employees.We are prohibited from to elected officials by employees disclosing or improperly obtaining non-public of companies which are seeking information submitted as part of a bid or proposal on or currently doing business with a U.S.government contract.If HNTB is assisting the t° a government department or U.S.government with source selection,as that term is agency.Allowable contributions defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation(FAR) j1 may also be required to be and its accompanying guidance,we are prohibited publicly disclosed by filing from disclosing information we are given during f periodic reports,or as part of that process otherwise known as"Source Selection Information:'In addition,even if we are not assisting �''- ! the proposal process to secure with a source selection,we are prohibited from ~ r business opportunities.Employees seeking or obtaining such information from an r r should be aware that making routside source.HNTB can also receive confidential r prohibited personal contributions, information accidentally,such as a Contracting including contributions by Officer for the U.S.government sends out a immediate family members,may disqualify HNTB from submitting a proposal with a certain agency for competitor's information mistakenly.If this occurs a specified amount of time.Additional penalties also you not read the information and shouldmay be imposed. immediately contact the Business Integrity Office for guidance.Do not transmit,forward or disclose Employees must comply with all applicable laws what you have received to anyone internal or external and regulations governing political contributions. to the company. Employees must maintain the highest ethical standards The second part of this Act restricts HNTB when making individual or PAC contributions to ensure that no appearance of impropriety is conveyed. from engaging in ensa Bions about employment Employees with any questions should contact or providing compensation in any form to a U.S. HNTB Government Relations.For additional government employee who has or is engaged in information,please see our Political Contribution acquisition activities for any procurement and Activity Policy. involving HNTB. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFC) 2019-109-ND 29 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Consequently,HNTB employees should not engage in employment discussions of any kind with any current Remember, or former U.S.government employee without the before talking prior approval of the Human Resources Department. If contacts are made or discussions initiated for this to a federal, state purpose by a government employee,employees should or local employee contact the talent manager in Human Resources about employment immediately for further guidance. at HNTB, get appropriate Similar or even more stringent requirements approval—just may be adopted by other HNTB clients through state,municipal or local laws or within contract engaging someone requirements.It is important that you are either in a job opportunity knowledgeable of these requirements,or that you discussion is reach out to the Business Integrity Office for advice violating the policy. and/or approval. You cannot have a Career discussion. For additional information,please see our Compliance with Procurement Integrity Policy. Examples You are providing substantial input on a proposal for a procurement with a federal agency.Over the years,you have had contact with the government official responsible for the procurement. a. Can you"bounce"a few numbers off him before finalizing your input? No,not if it is a competitive federal procurement. b. You bump into him outside the office.Can you casually discuss with him the direction your competitors'proposals are taking? No,this is a clear violation of the law. You would like to hire a former federal official who worked on a contract similar to the one you are currently working on.You approach him for a discussion.Can you begin discussing the particulars of a job you'd like him to fill? No,you need to work with Human Resources to determine whether these discussions should take place. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 30 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA e SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR CONDUCTING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS When conducting business with foreign entities and individuals, HNTB must comply with U.S.and foreign laws and regulations. In a three-year As representatives of the firm,employees must be knowledgeable period,individual of regulations applicable to their job duties and conduct themselves prosecutions appropriately.The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act(FCPA),Export and enforcement Controls,Anti-boycott and Economic Sanctions laws are among the actions have many U.S.rules that require our compliance.Information detailing increased over U.S.law,as well as HNTB policy,governing each of these items may be 200 percent and found within the HNTB International Handbook. fines and penalties have increased FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (FCPA) over 600 percent. The FCPA prohibits the offer or giving of anything of value to any foreign official for Last year, the the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or otherwise securing an improper U.S.government advantage."Anything of value"includes both tangible items(cash,trips,excessive assessed per diems,entertainment,offers of employment,meals,and so forth)and intangible $3 billion in gifts to a charity of the official's choosing.A foreign official may include not only penalties for traditional government officials,such as legislators,judges or regulators,but also any employee of a foreign government-owned or operated entity,such as an employee of violations a company that is partially owned by a foreign government. of the FCPA, export controls Violation of this law can result in extremely negative consequences to both HNTB and economic and to the individuals involved.The rules governing gifts and entertainment to sanctions laws foreign officials are complicated,and the normal rules regarding what is proper and regulations. entertaining do not necessarily provide concrete guidance;therefore,all payments, gifts and entertainment given to any foreign official must be approved in advance by the Business Integrity Office.This includes even so-called"grease"or facilitating payments(payments made for routine governmental action,such as paying to have a data line installed).The U.S.Department of Justice Lesson Learned and the Securities Exchange Commission have become extremely aggressive in FCPA enforcement Several medical device and pharmaceutical companies actions,so HNTB's policy is to approve any payments have been prosecuted under the FCPA for entertaining to foreign officials only after careful consideration doctors employed by foreign government-owned that the payment is not being made in return for hospitals.In at least one case,simply purchasing lunch governmental action that would create an FCPA for a doctor was considered a bribe and subjected the violation.For additional information,please see our company to prosecution by the U.S.government. In Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Policy. none of these cases was the foreign"official"operating in a traditional government capacity. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com i http://Intranet.hntb.org/sites/Integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFC) 2019-109-ND 31 DocuSign Envelope ID.4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA EXPORT CONTROLS export control implications for a project and to obtain Conducting international business transactions the proper authorization before the transfer of any and dealing with non-U.S.persons are activities controlled item occurs.For additional information, that require HNTB to comply with multiple U.S. please see our Export Controls Policy. export control laws. An export includes not only the shipment or transmission of controlled goods to ECONOMIC SANCTIONS a foreign country or person,but also the export of In order to administer its foreign trade policy,the U.S. services or information.Even the oral,written or visual government maintains a list of sanctioned countries disclosure to a foreign national that takes place within and individuals with whom HNTB and its employees the United States can qualify as an export.Typical are prohibited or severely restricted from conducting items that HNTB possesses that could be restricted business.Restrictions can be both with regard to the for export include software,instructions,engineering governments of sanctioned countries(such as Cuba, designs,plans,photographs,diagrams,blueprints Iran and the Sudan)and with regard to persons who and manuals. are engaged in sanctioned activities(such as terrorism, proliferation or weapons of mass destruction,and If you are considering any business activity with narcotics trafficking).You are personally responsible foreign nationals(non-U.S.persons)or entities, for ensuring that HNTB only conducts business with please contact the Business Integrity Office to fully those entities or individuals deemed acceptable under discuss your project and/or interaction with these the law.Because the government list of sanctioned nationals/entities. parties is dynamic,you must take action on each Many items and information can be lawfully project or transaction with a foreign party to ensure transferred once the U.S.government has reviewed that its name does not appear on a sanctions list. the specifics and granted an export license.You are (Note:you may never place reliance on a prior review expected to make use of the Business Integrity Office of the list). to ensure a complete understanding of possible For countries: http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/enforcement/ofac/ programs/index.shtml OQuestion For entities/individuals: Juanita is preparing to travel outside of the U.S.and has decided that she must take her laptop computer along.The laptop contains http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/ software that HNTB has used to design many of its U.S.projects. liststocheck.htm While Juanita is aware that the information is considered both If you discover that your prospective client appears sensitive and company proprietary,she does not plan to share any of it while on her trip.Should Juanita take her laptop on the trip or on one of these lists,immediately contact the leave it in the United States? Business Integrity Office for further instruction. For additional information,please see our Economic 0 Answer Sanctions Policy. Juanita must first coordinate with a member of the Business Integrity Office.A decision will be reached as to whether she must remove all or a portion of the sensitive software before her trip begins.If Juanita determines that a portion of the included material is essential to her trip,a U.S.export license may need to be obtained before she leaves the country. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx 32 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID'4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA ANTIBOYCOTT LAWS COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS AND REGULATIONS Both HNTB and the federal government have a Antiboycott laws and regulations prohibit U.S. "zero tolerance policy"regarding trafficking in companies from participating in certain types persons. Employees are prohibited from:(1) of boycotts and other restrictive trade practices engaging in any form of trafficking in persons against countries considered"friendly"to the U.S. during the period of performance of a contract;(2) government.Antiboycott laws apply to all boycotts procuring commercial sex acts during the period of imposed by foreign countries that are unsanctioned by performance of a contract;and(3)using forced labor the United States,which currently is the Arab League in the performance of a contract.A violation of this boycott of Israel.Most notably,the U.S.antiboycott policy may result in disciplinary action,up to and restrictions prohibit both agreements to participate including termination.In addition,if an employee in the boycott(such as by agreeing that HNTB will becomes aware of a violation of this policy by an not use Israeli subcontractors)or by merely providing employee,subcontractor or subcontractor employee, information in support of the boycott(such as the employee must notify his or her supervisor or the providing information regarding the nationalities of Business Integrity Office.For more information,see HNTB senior management).An example of an item Combating Trafficking in Persons Policy. of concern is language contained within a Request for Proposal(RFP)or a contract asking HNTB to represent or certify that it has never done(or will never do)business with a firm or person from Israel.You must thoroughly review solicitations (particularly from foreign entities)to identify any language/request of this nature,and if found,to immediately report the matter to the Business Integrity Office.Under no circumstance may you knowingly honor such a request,i.e.,execute a document containing such language. In addition to prohibiting participation or support of the Arab League boycott of Israel,U.S.regulations also require that HNTB report any such requests to U.S.government officials each quarter.This only can occur if HNTB is consistently notified if it receives any such requests.For additional information,please see our Antiboycott Laws and Regulations Policy. For further details regarding matters involving the Integrity in Conducting Business Internationally, please consult the HNTB International Handbook. Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com I http://intranet.hntb.org/sites/integrity/SitePages/Home.aspx GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFC) 2019-109-ND 33 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA CODE OF BUSINESS INTEGRITY HNTB Integrity Hotline 1(855)252-7606 or www.hotline-services.com 1it In�: 309ebtal Recycled Aber C 2011 HNTB Companies.An rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited. 34 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 2 Experience & Qualifications rnrD rD rD O DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 2.1 ProposingFirm ua iHca ions o DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Founded in 1914, HNTB has built a reputation for excellence and innovation. HNTB is the planner, designer and construction manager for$11 billion of infrastructure annually across the U.S. We understand the issues that affect a client's ability to complete complex infrastructure projects and programs. We have a proven track record of excellent service across the country with clients on a federal, state and local level. In addition, HNTB represents four of the state's five expressway enterprises serving as a General Engineering Consultant or Project Manager for Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Central Florida Expressway Authority, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority and the Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority. EXPERIENCE AND HNTB is known as an expert in the transportation industry and provides the following projects to support our claim. The following QUALIFICATIONS pages detail our range of experience to successfully execute the City's vision for Miami Beach and speak to HNTB's successful history with projects similar to the scope of service identified in the solicitation. We look forward to the opportunity to continue supporting the City of Miami Beach. 2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSING FIRM FIRM EXPERIENCE GENERAL i. ., TRANSPORTATION AGENCY NAME: _ PLANNING AND TRAFFIC City of Miami Beach . ENGINEERING SERVICES AGENCY CONTACT: •_ • : .� , _ • Josiel Ferrer-Diaz,PE Miami Beach selected HNTB on the General CONTACT TELEPHONE: Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering (305)673-7000,ext 6831 Consultant Services - 2017-126-KB and ranked first amongst 17 consultants. HNTB has completed several challenging task work order assignments, including a CONTACT EMAIL: traffic study for the Bayshore neighborhood to address event cut-through traffic. josielferrer@miamibeachfl.gov Traffic observation and data collection during the Art Basel event were analyzed YEAR(S)AND TERM OF supplemented by historical StreetLightTM database. Traffic calming strategies were ENGAGEMENT:2017-Ongoing evaluated and a series of traffic circles were recommended.Another task-work order was issued to study residents' concerns regarding safety due to speeding vehicles along Chase Avenue in the vicinity of W.34th Street.To improve safety and simplify operation, a new traffic circle was proposed at Chase Avenue and W.34th Street to address the speeding concern and complex geometry. At Miami Beach Senior High School two concepts were developed to provide safe student drop-off and pick-up areas to address vehicles stopping illegally and blocking through lanes on Dade Boulevard.Other tasks included data collection at various locations. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 35 DocuSign Envelope ID.4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA l ... _ .__ ...... ...,, I. . . I:.. I . .. , _ . . , � . .... • �. . , . ... , .. . . :� ,,...__ y A7c... '. • ?•fi .a�. —.rt '10-14- _r .. • • 3 - .. , ' - '^ .,r •n.tu::b.'4•tt!` ,.�dC -ti.t...,.as .. . ... t.: T CITY OF MIAMI TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT SERVICES FIRM EXPERIENCE Task-work order based contract focused on providing traffic engineering, planning, environmental,financial analysis,operations planning and public outreach services to AGEN : ' , the City of Miami. HNTB has provided multiple reports for public private partnership • • opportunities associated with transit within the City, as well as assisted with the ityofMiami • planning and operation for the expansion of the Miami Trolley System. The system A . ... OWTACT• has 44 vehicles with more than 400 stop locations and serving an estimated half '. ollin Worth million local residents on a monthly basis.HNTB was also tasked to develop and review • potential plans for a Multimodal Transportation Impact Fee program. •:r ELEP , . (305)416-1022 . HNTB has been reviewing development traffic impact studies on an ongoing basis for the City of Miami. In 2016, HNTB was reselected and continues to date this ,* r , ..,,, ! review as Miami goes through tremendous redevelopment growth.This contract will cworthcdmiamigov.com continue through May 2022. Review includes all steps starting from data collection, data analysis,parking,safety features,geometric, maneuverability within and around • proposed development, parking need and provisions, parking queuing including valet ' 2008-2016; when present. Reselected 2016-2022 36 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID 4F582607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA k 'r ii' - MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACT , . i / HNTB has been serving as an extension of the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) staff and aiding in the development and administration of transportation improvements throughout Miami-Dade County since 2007. HNTB provides a wide FIRM EXPERIENCE range of engineering, planning, design, environmental, right of way, architectural, landscape architecture, technical management and administrative services on the MDX system. Miami-Dade Expressway Authority HNTB currently assists MDX in the development of their five-year work program on an annual basis.HNTB staff have also assisted MDX in the development of a visioning , process and developing a strategic master plan and resultant visioning document. ayra Diaz _. _. The MDX Master Transportation Plan required the inclusion of data and information r , - ' , Pt,E: from MDX's five-year program in the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) (305)637-3277 Ext.2118 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan. The strategic planning process entailed coordination and facilitation with other agency stakeholders in the region and the successful development of consensus on a set of Tier 1 and Tier 2 priority projects. mdiaz@mdxway.com YEAR(S) AND,._•,: F, ENGAGEMEN i 2007-Ongoing FIRM EXPERIENCE ......... MIAMI-DADE MPO GENERAL AGENCY NAME: PLANNING CONTRACT Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning a 1-a • • •. Organization _. ' ' HNTB was selected to manage this work order- • based general planning services contract. AGENCY CONTACT: Alli ' Specific work orders included completing Jesus Guerra aesthetics design guidelines document CONTACT TELEPHONE: for county transportation projects, origin- (305)375 2069 destination surveys of the 95 Express bus routes, an evaluation process for school crossing guards,a bike to transit system improvements study,complete streets study CONTACT EMAIL: and bus rapid transit implementation plans for various corridors.HNTB also reviewed jguerra®miamidadempo.org several studies conducted by others related to transportation, planning and traffic YEAR(S)AND TERM OF engineering. ENGAGEMENT:2009-2015 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 37 on innuni DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA W AFT}RO.S f" Broward l'IP& IXt�fi yt0lM9 Y,•m.,�N.una O.Y..•w.en rAtZ<Y..., ,a_, woo en em. fz - — ,, _ iii PASS.Pins MunintalF1 Fromm L r DRAFT 7/15/20.9 ri: wfo.,�,dMP® — a" --�iba�•\,�r4.*!!�- COMPOSITE FRAMEWORKl 1 ▪is As se la ' 4- rr. /d .._,.. ` / .ems \ Z _ , ,... , .4.07 ''•` _ ............ hili.--f • 3,▪Y «rle nissinsnist OA ns .<... E- -� .... :M*ineverninitin. C,1 dy+ wM *&pAn 5.5 , _, 117. ' k aas swan* Ar •Y•nr warn — •, BROWARD COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MOBILITY HUBS FIRM EXPERIENCE HNTB was awarded a contract with the Broward MPO to study and develop mobility hub master plans for various cities.A Mobility Hub is a transit access point with frequent transit service, high development potential and is a critical point for trip generation Broward Metropolitan Planning or transfers within the transit system. The end goal of the Master Plan is defining the investment of MPO funds for Mobility Hub improvements that complement future Organization infrastructure improvements and private development proposed within the planning T •_� CT: area. HNTB has developed ideas for potential project elements with a focus on .JamesCromar T' pedestrian and bicycle connections, secure and comfortable places to wait for transit, safe and easy transfers between routes,and additional multimodal improvements which f r, ONE: would enhance activities around the Mobility Hub areas. These investments in public 954)876-0038 . . . spaces provide the framework for private investment in places where people live,work CoR T EMAIL: and play.These improvements were implemented in the cities of: omarj®browarsmpo.orcf • • City of Hollywood YEAR(S) ' D - • OF • City of Coral Springs ENGAGEMEN 2016-Ongoing • City of Pembroke Pines • City of Plantation • City of Sunrise 38 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-682862A08CDA ,, t, - FDOT DISTRICT 4 DISTRICTWIDE TRAFFIC ISTUDIES AND PLANS REVIEW •, ' v + 'jN . HNTB reviews a series of task-work orders under the Districtwide Plans Review e.. r '' : contract. Our reviews included roadway design, structural elements, bridge design, drainage,traffic signalization plans,maintenance of traffic and signing and pavement FIRM EXPERIENCE marking plans prepared by other consultants and in-house staff to ensure adherence to standards, proper safety and operational parameters. To date, over 30 task-work orders have been reviewed, several of which were reviewed simultaneously within short-time frame.HNTB developed and refined a review and quality control process to Florida Department of Transportation ensure consistent quality reviews that were checked, verified and delivered on time, District 4 within budget and to the client's complete satisfaction. CY . 'TA T': Zoryana Fedyushko • EPHONE: (954)777-4329 ' • CONTAC- zoryana.fedyushko@dot.state.fl.us YEAR(S) AND.1 ENGAGEMEN '',. •.:.-- •,._... .__ FIRM EXPERIENCE FDOT DISTRICT 6 AGENCY NAME: 1 figillW TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Florida Department of Transportation i MANAGEMENT AND District 6 „` • ItWh' xd OPERATIONS AGENCY CONTACT: • NV Javier Rodriguez,PE Since 2009, HNTB Corporation has been a partner with the Florida Department of Transportation CONTACT TELEPHONE: (FDOT) serving as the representative on the (305)640-7307 Statewide TSM&0 Program.The FDOT District 6 TSM&O program represents a broad range of operations and management activities that are deployed to improve transportation CONTACT EMAIL: system performance, particularly to achieve the highest level of utility from available javier.rodriguez@dot.state.fl.us infrastructure and resources.Many of those activities have demonstrable success,while YEAR(S)AND TERM OF others reflect activities that have been updated.HNTB's scope activities include providing ENGAGEMENT:2009-Ongoing technical support in areas of strategic and business planning, studies and conceptual . plans,deployment,and operations and maintenance. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 39 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA PRINCIPAL EXPERIENCE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ,,,in'«'r"r"+' CONSULTING SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS City of Miami Beach ` Our proposed project manager, Rafiq Alqasem, PE, PTOE, served as the project manager on this project for the entire duration of this contract.The scope of services Josiel Ferrer-Diaz,PE provided to the City included data collection, transportation planning studies and .,, 4ni traffic operations studies. Many of these services provided resulted in operational (305)673-7000,ext 6831 and geometric improvements that were then taken to the next phase of improving operational efficiencies through implementing modifications such as signal timings, w+i1: signing and markings, design modifications to intersections with si nalization, josielferreri miamibeachfl.gov pedestrian ramps, minor lane reassignments and widenings to add turning lane • - pockets. Rafiq also conducted numerous transportation planning,traffic engineering YEAR(S) AND • and geometric improvement technical reviews on an as-needed basis as directed by ENGAGEM ;; 2006-2012 ) the City. PRINCIPAL EXPERIENCE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC AGENCY NAME: CONSULTING SERVICES ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS City of Miami Beach AGENCY CONTACT: This project was a re-selection from the City of Miami Beach on behalf of Rafiq Algasem's, Josiel Ferrer-Diaz,PE PE,PTOE,superior performance on the prior project,General Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Services on an "As Needed Basis", with the City. CONTACT TELEPHONE: Our proposed project manager, Rafiq Alqasem continued to serve as the project (305)673-7000,ext 6831 manager on this project until his transition to HNTB.The scope of services provided CONTACT EMAIL: to Miami Beach included data collection, conducting several transportation planning josielferrer@miamibeachfl.gov assignments, traffic operational studies, reviews of technical traffic impact studies submitted by land developers for proposed projects and some minor geometric design YEAR(S)AND TERM OF work orders. ENGAGEMENT:2012-2013 40 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA PRINCIPAL EXPERIENC CITY OF OAKLAND PARK CITYWIDE TRAFFIC CALMING STUDY AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN City of Oakland Park • • The Citywide Traffic Calming Study evaluated the causes for the cut through traffic and ..A, N T GO TAC s developed recommendations to mitigate traffic and reduce the impact on residential Ann Perrotta streets. Our proposed project manager, Rafiq Alqasem, PE, PTOE, worked intimately ELEPHONE: with the 29 residential communities that comprise the City to develop community (772)678-665 specific recommendations to calm traffic in their neighborhood and continues to maintain connections in the local community. The City of Oakland Park issued a ti.0 •i „ Certificate of Appreciation to Rafiq Alqasem,PE, PTOE,for the successful completion arperrotta2003@yahoo.com of this project. YEAR(S)AND,.: ENGAGEMEN' 2003-2009 - s PRINCIPAL EXPERIENCE CITY OF OAKLAND PARK DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AND REVITALIZATION AGENCY NAME: City of Oakland Park Our proposed project manager,Rafiq Alqasem,PE, PTOE,served as project manager AGENCY CONTACT: for the City of Oakland Park on the Redevelopment and Revitalization Project which Ann Perrotta resulted in a certificate of recognition from the City.The Downtown Redevelopment and Revitalization Plan developed and recommended mixed land uses and densities CONTACT TELEPHONE: for pedestrian,bicycle and transit use to encourage revitalization and resulted (772)678-6653 in reduced vehicular traffic.The City of Oakland Park issued a Certificate of CONTACT EMAIL: Appreciation to Rafiq Alqasem, PE,PTOE,for the successful completion of this arperrotta2003@yahoo.com project. YEAR(S)AND TERM OF ENGAGEMENT:2003-2008 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 41 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 2.2 Qualifications oProposer'sTea m O wSpn Envelope ID.4F502607-11M.FDSBICI.0a2862AoaCOA MIAMI BEACH PROJECT MANAGER QUALITY CONTROL PROJECT MANAGER PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE Vilma Croft,PE Rafiq Alqasem,PE,PTOE Gus Pego,PE • R R • • R R • TRAFFIC DEMAND PLANNING MULTIMODAL TRANSIT TRAFFIC OPERATIONS FORECASTING ITS SAFETY MICROSIMULATION ROADWAY Dan Beaty,AICP Christopher Gratz,AICP John Kulpa,Ph.D. Ytve Gurrera,PE Girish Kumar,PE,PTOE Omar AI-Sahili,PE Ytve Gurrera,PE Dominic Vanchure,PE Omar AI-Sahili,EI Juan Calderon,PE,PTOE,PTP• CALTRAN Engineering Group,Inc. ;L_..., — 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPOSER'S TEAM 1411, THE NNTB TEAM • - HNTB has assembled an exceptional group of professionals Alternatively,If the traffic study is basic and a face-to- ., - that will work closely With the City of Miami Beach's staff face is unnecessary,then Rafiq will contact the City's -Tf _ - to ensure complete contract success.The team has the Project Manager and discuss the project over the phone. 1 depth of experience,quality of management,technical Rafiq will be involved in every assignment received by expertise, state-of-the-art resources and exemplary HNTB for this project. quality assurance/control procedures in place to provide 1 �-- - the City with the services it expects and requires. study generally reviews arepurelyhrafl c operation omost o the traf whichl It is expected t -�e `. ft -- The services HNTB will provide to the City of Miami Beach means that they can be reviewed and checked by one em ..- under this project involves reviewing traffic studies of our traffic operation staff who will report his or her �*� conducted by developers' traffic consultants, as well recommendation and comments to Rafiq. 4 ;;S •-•''''';'''''''.''~ t as in-house staff.As such,HNTB will work closely with For those traffic studies that may involve and require City staff and act as extension of the City staff If and specialized expertise such as ITS,transit,travel demand _y - when requested including appearing in front of the City ,_______ ,� ,-- forecasting, Rafiq will coordinate with subject matter - -SN Planning Board to address.explain and defend traffic ;cY)raa , -i, expert(s) and seek his or her review comments and +- t - •�—. - study review comments. recommendations. I,' ^" - '�'sfq As soon as a traffic study review is requested by the City, I I it •I`' Project Manager,HNTB's Project Manage,Rafiq Alqasem will meet face-to-face with the City. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I NFO■OIR-INS-NO Sl DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Gus Pego is responsible for delivery of HNTB's services to transportation, transit and municipal clients, boasting 40 years of experience in the transportation industry. He has experience in all phases of transportation, including planning, design, construction, maintenance, operations, intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and administration. Gus has demonstrated a commitment to transportation engineering in Florida, as well as public service throughout his career.Prior to joining HNTB,Gus served as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6 Secretary, leading and managing the planning, development and implementation of a$3.5 billion (B), five-year transportation program. Gus had extensive involvement in the development of the 1-395 design-build (DB) GUS project as well as the development, implementation and construction of the PEGO, PE Port Miami Tunnel, a DB operate and maintain concession project. FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI, FL I Chief the District's ITS program.Directed the Administrative Officer leading and development of the District's Continuity of PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE managing the planning,development Operation Plan and served as a public and and implementation of a$3.5B,five-year intergovernmental liaison. transportation program.Communicated HNTB Corporation goals and objectives and met or exceeded FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI,FL I District all performance standards established by Maintenance Engineer who planned and rears of Experience the Florida Transportation Commission implemented the District Maintenance 40 Years and the Department's Executive Board. Program.Supervised maintenance of Negotiated,coordinated and partnered 680 centerline miles of highway and 904 EDUCATION with governmental and private entities bridges,and effectively integrated in- B.S., Civil Engineering, to facilitate the implementation of cost house and contract maintenance programs. University of Florida,1978 effective transportation infrastructure. Exceeded maintenance program objectives Efficiently managed resources,such and implemented in-house emergency as budget and staff,and effectively led efforts during Hurricane Andrew.Served as r'nUr t��lur�Nt r<tuIJ I hr+i IONS a public and intergovernmental liaison. Professional Engineer-Florida (1984) communications to a diverse workforce of 503 employees,consultants and FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI,FL I Production contractors.Served as Department Engineer who managed preliminary representative to all groups and engineering design activities for in- organizations,including the Metropolitan house projects and production support Planning Organization and the Miami-Dade services for project delivery.Assisted Expressway Authority,and effectively in work program development and communicated with elected officials and conducted public informational hearings the public to receive input and discuss and meetings.Served as a public and department programs and district projects. intergovernmental liaison. FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI, FL I Director of FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI, FL I Assistant Transportation Operations who delivered Leader Design and Squad Leader who a construction program totaling more prepared contract design plans and than$1B.Sustained superior maintenance specifications for roadway improvements. performance conditions ratings and led Prepared cost estimates,engineering the development and implementation of reports and developed schedules. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 43 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Rafiq Algasem brings 40 years of experience as a talented transportation engineering manager with hands-on experience working in the transportation industry with a focus on transportation planning, traffic engineering and intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Currently, Rafiq leads diverse teams of professionals in Miami to collaborate and develop out-of-the-box solutions to complex challenges in fast-paced environments. He will match his past experience working with the City of Miami Beach with knowledge of best practices nationwide to help Miami Beach to meet its vision for the future. GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING for microsimulation of the existing and the AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING proposed alternatives for this major east- RAFIQSERVICES ON AS-NEEDED BASIS,CITY west corridor. ALQASEM, PE, PTOE OF MIAMI BEACH, MIAMI BEACH FL Project Manager who led the team in TRI-RAIL DOUBLE TRACKING,SOUTH conducting and providing numerous FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT MANAGERtransportation planning and traffic AUTHORITY,WEST PALM BEACH TO MIAMI, engineering studies under two consecutive FL Project Manager for the assessment contracts,performed a large number of of required signalized intersection HNTB Corporation reviews of various studies and developed improvements,including geometric, recommendations for the City.Intimately operational and ITS.Responsible for signal years UI LApel lerlce involved in public workshops and preemption need and/or modification of 40 Years public presentations,as well as project existing preemption at 72 at-grade rail discussions and recommendation defenses crossings along the Tri Rail corridor.Work LUULMt ION at City Commission meetings,as requested. involved extensive coordination with FDOT, M.S.,Transportation Engineering, counties and cities in addition to all other ACCESS MANAGEMENT,FLORIDA team members. University of Florida,1987 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION M.S.,Construction Engineering, (FDOT)DISTRICT 4,DISTRICTWIDE, FL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC CALMING STUDY,CITY University of Florida,1986 Project Manager for more than seven OF OAKLAND PARK,OAKLAND PARK, FL B.S., Civil Engineering, years who developed access management Project Manager who led a team to study University of Leeds,1981 strategies and recommendations for the and engage with the community for the 29 District Office that would provide users different residential neighborhoods that PROFESSIONAL REGIS i IAN I VIYJ accessibility while improving safety and made up the City of Oakland Park.Each Professional Engineer-Florida (1989) mobility. neighborhood was studied independently and a range of potential traffic calming Professional Traffic Operations TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SAFETY measures were developed and presented Engineer- Florida MANAGEMENT, FDOT DISTRICT 4, to the neighborhood residents in a series DISTRICTWIDE, FL I Project Manager who of meetings.Recommended traffic calming developed recommendations for the measures were finalized and recommended District Office that would improve traffic for design and installation.This study was operations and safety strategies for all highly controversial at the start of the roadway users,particularly at locations project but gained community support with crash rates. through engaging the community.Rafiq was awarded a Certificate of Appreciation SR 836 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT from the City Commission for this effort. ALTERNATIVES, MIAMI,FL I Ouality Control and Supervision of the study responsible 44 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34M-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA RAFIQ ALQASEM, PE, PTOE PROJECT MANAGER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT,CITY OF OAKLAND PARK, DRAWBRIDGE OPERATIONS MICROSIMULATION,U.S.COAST OAKLAND PARK,FL I Project Manager who recommended mixed GUARD(USCG), FL I Project Manager who managed this land uses and developed densities that will help in revitalizing project which examined maximizing the efficiency of operating the downtown area,generate multi-modal transportation use drawbridges in the South Florida area where heavy vehicular and reduce the vehicular traffic that would be generated.The traffic shares the bridge operation with heavy marine vessel goal is to avoid traffic congestion that would negatively impact traffic.The timing and duration of lifting these bridges were the City and the major state arteries,including Oakland Park studied to optimize the operation system wide for both roadway Road and Dixie Highway,that are already over capacity during and marine traffic. peak hours.Rafiq received a Certificate of Appreciation from the City Commission for this project GENERAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES,VARIOUS CLIENTS, SR 826 EAST WEST ITS,FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI,FL I Project VARIOUS CITIES,U.S.AND PUERTO RICO I Project Manager for Manager for the short range ITS feasibility and implementation services including conducting and reviewing transportation along the 8-mile expressway section connecting Interstate-95 planning and traffic engineering and parking studies,reviewing (1-95)and 1-75.Incident detection techniques,closed-circuit TV permit studies,development of regional impacts,traffic impact cameras,variable message signs,diversion routes,highway studies,traffic circulation and traffic calming studies,developing advisory radio and a combination of spread-spectrum radio were conceptual improvement alternatives and the design of many recommended for this corridor. signal plans among other services. DISTRICTWIDE SIGNAL INSPECTION AND SIGNAL TIMING PLANS, POST HURRICANE GEORGE RECOVERY, PUERTO RICO HIGHWAY FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI,FL I Project Manager responsible for AND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,PR I Project Manager for data collection,signal inventory,signal timing plan development, this large multi-discipline project,with a budget of over$2.5 installation and fine tuning of a districtwide project with FDOT. million.Developed a program to inventory and design signs in Computer software utilized include HCS and SYNCHRO. Puerto Rico,post Hurricane George.Project was completed in nine months. PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL(PD&E), FOOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI,FL I TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND PARKING STUDY,SAN JUAN ARENA, Supervisor for this PD&E study examining bridge and tunnel SAN JUAN,PR I Project Manager of this 22,000 seat,state-of- alternatives extensively. the-art arena in the Hato Rey area for all traffic circulation, traffic improvements,ITS implementations,parking demand SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA,HARD ROCK HOLLYWOOD, and recommended supply as well as developing the automated HOLLYWOOD, FL I Project Manager for all traffic operated issues parking system. and geometric improvement and recommendations.Responsible for developing parking needs for future expansion facilities and valet parking plan development to ensure a safe,efficient and enjoyable experience for patrons that minimized delay. PARKING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR BODWITCH POINT PARK IN LEE COUNTY,FL I Project Manager who conducted traffic impact analysis and determined parking needs.Various remote parking locations were studied in conjunction with a transit system to serve the park's visitors and the surrounding community. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 45 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Vilma Croft brings 35 years of experience in the transportation sector. Vilma brings experience in design management of all types of rural and urban design transportation projects, including roadway and interstate reconstruction projects, pavement only, and ride only projects. Vilma is a senior manager with knowledge of the PD&E Manual, Plans Preparation Manual, AASHTO Design Standards, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Indexes of the Roadway and Traffic Design Standards. SR 90/SW 8TH/SW 7TH STREET PD&E SR 836 PD&E STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6, STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI, FL I MIAMI, FL I Project Manager responsible Project Manager responsible for the for the completion of the NEPA VILMA completion of the National Environmental documentation for FHWA approval for CROFT, PE Policy Act(NEPA)documentation for SR 836 from NW 17th Avenue to the 1-95 Federal Highway Administration(FHWA) Interchange.FHWA originally assigned approval.Categorical Exclusion(CE)for an EIS Class of Action,which was QUALITY CO N T R O L safety and operational improvements later downgraded to an EA.Prepared along the SR 90 one-way pairs from SW documentation for FHWA concurrence 27th Avenue to Brickell Avenue,including to further downgrade project from an HNTB Corporation improvements to the 1-95 interchange. EA to a CE Type 2 due to reduced ROW and environmental impacts.Completed 1-95 SW 10TH STREET PD&E STUDY, CE for widening the mainline and new Tedi s of Lxpel lefCe FDOT DISTRICT 4, FORT LAUDERDALE, 35 Years ramp connections to 1-95 north and FL Project Manager responsible for the south.This project required a Systems completion of the NEPA documentation for Interchange Modification Report(SIMR)and EDUCATION capacity and operational improvements close coordination with the Miami Dade B.S., Civil Engineering along 1-95 from just south of SW 10th Expressway Authority. University of Florida,1984 Street to just north of Hillsboro Boulevard. This study also includes improvements SR 93/1-75 PD&E STUDY SR 826/PALMETTO PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS along both SW 10th Street and Hillsboro EXPRESSWAY, FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI- Professional Engineer Florida (1989) Boulevard. DADE AND BROWARD COUNTIES, FL I Project Manager responsible for SR KROME AVENUE SOUTH PD&E STUDY, FDOT 93/1-75 from the Miami-Dade/Broward DISTRICT 6,MIAMI, FL I Project Manager County Line to the Palmetto Expressway. responsible for the completion of the NEPA Also,coordinated completion of NEPA documentation for FHWA approval and documentation with FDOT District 4 an EIS for reconstruction from SW 296th for the SR 93/1-75 PD&E study from the Street to SW 136th Street,approximately Miami-Dade/Broward County Line to 1-595 10 miles from two lanes to four lanes for FHWA approval.This project required divided.Also,responsible for coordinating extensive coordination with District 4 and FOOT and FHWA legal review.This project Florida's Turnpike Enterprise throughout. entailed extensive project coordination One SIMR was prepared for both Districts 4 and public involvement to minimize ROW, and 6 projects.Extensive cultural access management and environmental resources coordination was required to impacts. develop avoidance alternatives for tribal burial site found within the proposed Miami Gardens Interchange. 46 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA VILMA CROFT, PE QUALITY CONTROL 1-395 PD&E STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI, FL I Project NW 12TH AVENUE BRIDGE PD&E STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI, Manager responsible for the completion of the NEPA FL I Project Manager responsible for securing LOCA for the documentation for FHWA approval.Led the EIS from just west of replacement of the Historic Bridge.This project required 4(F) the SR 836/1-95/1-395 Interchange to the MacArthur Causeway coordination with SHPO. Bridge,covering approximately 1.5 miles of interstate.This study entailed extensive project coordination to minimize SOMBRERO BEACH ROAD PD&E STUDY FROM AVENIDA impacts to the Overtown community and was featured by PRIMICERIA TO SOMBRERO BOULEVARD,FDOT DISTRICT 6, the Transportation Research Board for outstanding public MARATHON, FL I Project Manager responsible for completing involvement efforts. NEPA documentation for FHWA approval for Cat-Ex for the reconstruction of a 2 lane off state highway system in 1-395 RECONSTRUCTION, FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI, FL I coordination with the City of Marathon. Project Manager responsible for the completion of concept plans and request for proposal for the design build finance OVERSEAS HIGHWAY(US-1) LOWER MATECUMBE KEY TURN delivery of 1-395 from west of SR 836/1-95/1-395 Interchange to LANES PD&E STUDY,VILLAGE OF ISLAMORADA,FL FROM MM the MacArthur Causeway Bridge.Responsible for ROW maps, 73 TO MM 78, FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI, FL I Project Manager intelligent transportation systems,drainage,utility relocations, responsible for securing LDCA approval by FHWA for turn lane a signing master plan,permits,structures,risk analysis improvements. and maintenance of traffic plans.Managed extensive public OVERSEAS HIGHWAY(US 1) GRASSY KEY TURN LANES involvement with stakeholders,elected officials,Miami-Dade PD&E STUDY FROM MM 57.4 TO MM 59.9,FDOT DISTRICT 6, County,City of Miami,Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing MARATHON, FL I Project Manager responsible for securing Arts,Downtown Development Authority,the neighborhood of LDCA approval by FHWA for turn lane improvements at six Overtown,and the media for project coordination and selection intersections on the Overseas Highway. of a signature bridge design.Efforts included interviews with the Miami Herald,Huffington Post and Spanish radio stations. BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/SR 5/US 1 PD&E STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6, Spanning approximately 1.5 miles of interstate,this project MIAMI,FL I Project Manager responsible for the preparation of featured 13 Category 2 bridges,including a signature design for the Preliminary Engineering Report for completion of the NEPA the main span.The project required four design exceptions and documentation for FHWA approval.Cat-Ex for reconstruction eight design variations. from a four-lane undivided to a four-lane divided section. SR 9A/I-95/NW 14TH STREET PD&E STUDY, FDOT DISTRICT 6, SR 7 CORRIDOR EXTENSION FROM OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD TO MIAMI, FL I Project Manager responsible for the NEPA NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD PD&E STUDY, FDOT DISTRICT 4,WEST documentation for a Categorical Exclusion Type II(Cat-Ex)for PALM BEACH, FL I Project Manager responsible for the NEPA new access ramps to and from 1-95 south at NW 14th Street.This documentation for EIS for the extension of SR 7.This project project required extensive public involvement in the Overtown required extensive coordination with Palm Beach County in an community,however,it was dropped from the Work Program due effort to exchange the FOOT-owned 200-foot wide alignment to controversy in Overtown. with the county owned right of way preserved for transportation purposes.DOT owned alignment was primarily high quality NW 87TH AVENUE PD&E STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI, FL I wetlands which required continuous coordination with SFWMD. Project Manager responsible for completion of the EA and FONSI for LDCA approval for a 3 mile segment of NW 87th Avenue from NW 58th Street to NW 103rd Street.The Study included a new bridge crossing over the Miami Canal and a new FEC crossing. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 47 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Dan Beaty brings 26 years of experience in travel demand modeling and a wealth of knowledge in modeling to any project. He has also produced a methodology to incorporate autonomous, connected, electric and share use vehicles (ACES) for the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT)into the model stream. He has worked extensively on the SERPM forecasting tool - version 7071 and has setup/configured multiple computer systems to run 7071. He is very familiar with the operations of version 7071 and understands the impacts it can have on model run output. PALMETTO EXPRESSWAY(SR 826) alternatives development,analysis and DAN MULTIMODAL INTERSTATE MASTER PLAN, cost comparisons;environmental studies MIAMI,FL I Lead Travel Demand Modeler and review or preparation of various BEATY, AICP who conducted highway and transit environmental documents from categorical network editing and coding,alternative exclusions to a supplemental EIS;regional TRAFFIC DEMAND testing and summarized highway and traffic modeling and micro-simulation FORECASTING transit model results.Work on the Palmetto analysis;express lane network and access Expressway included high-occupancy planning;concept design of express vehicle modeling and the use of a nested lane systems and complex interchanges; HNTB Corporation logit mode choice model. program sequencing;work programming; cost and schedule management; tears 01 Lxpei fence OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE,TAMPA BAY and design build RFP development, 26 Years NEXT(TB NEXT)AND FDOT DISTRICT 7, procurement support. HILLSBOROUGH,POLK,AND PINELLAS EDUCATION COUNTIES, FL I Travel Demand Modeling GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Lead and ELToD Oversight for this program. (GEC), FDOT DISTRICT 3, DISTRICTWIDE, M.S., Urban & Regional Planning, As Owner's Representative,HNTB supports FL I Intermodal Systems Development Lead Florida State University,1992 FDOT District 7 in all aspects of public for this five-year GEC in which HNTB is B.S., Political Science, involvement,planning,environmental providing a variety of engineering services Florida State University,1990 studies,concept development,traffic to the District.Specializing in travel analysis,preliminary engineering and demand modeling and traffic,provided i KUrLJJIUNAL rrLUf51 iiAl IONS design-build procurement.The TB NEXT consistent and dependable traffic forecasts American Institute of Certified program includes modernization of and analysis on many District projects. Planners(1995) 90 miles of interstate in nine project segments,encompassing four systems 9TH AVENUE INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION interchanges and over 200 lane miles of REPORT, FDOT DISTRICT 3,ESCAMBIA proposed tolled express lanes.The program COUNTY, FL(Project Manager responsible also covers integration of multi-modal for traffic analysis and all meetings with transportation projects,local road system the agencies and District's Interchange enhancements and complete streets Review Committee.This project ran implementation.The TB NEXT program concurrently with the re-evaluation of I-10 cost is estimated at approximately$7 in Escambia County. billion.HNTB services include:program GULF COAST PARKWAY PROJECT management;project management; DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT(PD&E) public involvement and stakeholder STUDY, FDOT DISTRICT 3, BAY COUNTY, engagement;supporting District 7's FL I Traffic Lead for this project providing workforce development initiative;extensive PD&E services on an environmental impact 48 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA DAN BEATY, AICP TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECASTING statement(EIS)for the Gulf Coast Parkway,a proposed new study.The study involved extensive use of the FDOT statewide 35-mile highway connecting US 98 in Gulf County with US 231 model,in conjunction with FSUTMS model results for Tallahassee in Bay County.Phase I of the study included the completion of and Fort Walton Beach,as well as growth trend projections of a corridor analysis and the efficient transportation decision annual average daily traffic(AADT). making programming screen.Phase II will include conceptual designs,the final EIS,development of conceptual mitigation 1-10 MASTER PLAN, FDOT DISTRICT 2, NORTHEAST, FL I Task measures and the selection of an alignment for design. Manager for the I-10 Corridor between the Madison County line and 1-292 in Duval County.Accomplished travel demand GULF TO BAY HIGHWAY PD&E STUDY,OPPORTUNITY FLORIDA, forecasting for numerous conceptual mobility enhancement GULF AND BAY COUNTIES, FL I Traffic Lead involved a PD&E alternatives,documented the traffic forecasting methodology study of the proposed Gulf to Bay Highway.The study provided and existing/projected traffic volumes,assisted in project support and documentation for Opportunity Florida to reach a coordination and produced design hour traffic volumes for all decision on the type,design and location of improvements for interchanges analyzed in this study.The study involved use of this transportation facility. FDOT statewide model,in conjunction with urban FSUTMS model results,as well as growth trend projections of AADT. 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE,TALLAHASSEE-LEON COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO), 1-4 ULTIMATE PD&E, FDOT DISTRICT 5,SEMINOLE TO POLK TALLAHASSEE,FL I Task Manager on the Tallahassee-Leon COUNTY, FL I Lead Travel Demand Modeler responsible for all County MPO 2020 Transportation Plan Update,the focus of which travel demand modeling and design hour traffic development. was to correct travel demand models through extensive review This project was very complex from both a design traffic and and update of all model inputs and outputs. modeling perspective.It enabled us to look at splits between BROWARD URBAN STUDY AREA MODEL VALIDATION,BROWARD general use and express lanes.Looking at peak periods instead of only a design hour allowed for a better understanding of COUNTY, BROWARD,FL I Project Manager responsible for traffic flow into and out of the express lanes.1-4 Ultimate is an analyzing and updating the highway and transit networks for important project for Central Florida.The 21 mile makeover— full compatibility with the new"two digit"facility type and from west of Kirkman Road in Orange County to east of State area-type coding methodology for Florida Standardized Urban Road 434 in Seminole County—is transforming the region Transportation Modeling Software(FSUTMS). to better connect our communities,boost our economy and LRTP 2020 PLAN, BROWARD COUNTY,COUNTRYWIDE, FL I Lead improve everyone's quality of life. Travel Demand Modeler who assisted with the Broward County CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING MODEL APPLICATION LRTP,coded the needs and cost feasible plan highway and IMPROVEMENT PLAN, FDOT DISTRICT 5,DISTRICTWIDE, FL I transit networks,performed air quality analysis and created the Travel Demand Modeler for implementation of graphical user conformity determination report. interface and subarea applications for both the daily and time of 1-10 MULTIMODAL INTERSTATE MASTER PLAN,FDOT DISTRICT 3, day CFRPM 6.0 models. NORTHWEST,FL I Deputy Project Manager and Travel Demand Modeler who completed work on the Multi-modal Interstate Master Plan for the I-10 Corridor between Okaloosa and Jefferson Counties.Accomplished travel demand forecasting for five conceptual mobility enhancement alternatives,documented the traffic forecasting methodology and existing/projected traffic volumes,assisted in project coordination and produced design hour traffic volumes for nine interchanges analyzed in this GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 49 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Christopher Gratz is a certified urban planner with 22 years of municipal planning experience with expertise in code compliance,communicating complex matters effectively to diverse audiences, comprehensive planning, historic • preservation, ordinance composition, permit reviews, policy and process analysis,presentations, public hearings, public participation, reports, research and data analysis, site plan review, urban design and zoning administration. COMMUNITY PLANNER,CORAL SPRINGS, CITY OF OAKLAND PARK,OAKLAND FL I Land Development Compliance Planner PARK, FL I Senior Planner and Zoning for the Planning and Zoning department Reviewer for the Development Review CHRISTOPHER for several cities on an as-needed basis. Committee,Chair of the Neighborhood Duties primarily include providing Traffic Committee,liaison to the GRATZ, AICP assistance and information to the public Planning and Zoning Board,liaison to regarding local zoning codes,building the Board of Adjustment,Liaison to permit and site plan reviews,zoning the Historic Preservation Board and inspections,advising code enforcement Historic Preservation Officer.Managed officers,project coordination,research, the development entitlement process document preparation,staff reports, by coordinating and reviewing every HNTB Corporation presentations,comprehensive planning, type of development application from land development code amendments, concept to construction.Provided zoning Years of txperience grants,and making presentations to information;prepared amendments to the 22 Years advisory board and elected officials at City Code;worked with code enforcement public hearings. and property owners to resolve violations; EDUCATION review building permits and all business M.S.Geography and Regional THE PRESERVE AT RIVERWALK,CITY OF tax receipts.Managed the traffic calming BRADENTON, FL I Successfully reviewed ro ram and budget and assisted in Planning, Indiana University of and processed all Planning and Zoning program g g Pennsylvania,1996 preparing the division budget.Participated entitlements for this controversial and in the preparation of RFPs,as a member B.S., Environmental Studies, complex mixed-use redevelopment project Slippery Rock University,1993 with over 200 dwelling units and 10,000 of the consultant selection committee for contract services and managed the square feet of retail and office space work of consultants.Coordinated and r'rvur LJJIUi AL in.u13I KAI TUNS using the City of Bradenton's Form Based reviewed traffic and noise impact analysis American Institute of Certified Code.Developed a comprehensive plan by consultants.Represented the City at Planners (2008) involving trading an existing City park for meetings with neighborhood associations, new park land along a river,amendments business owner groups,County and State to the Future Land Use Plan Map,land use agencies.Completed special projects changes,plat reversions,right-of-way assigned directly by the City Manager, vacations,and a special area plan in which including grant applications.Supervised, the City prevailed in a law suit. develop assignments for and mentor GRAND PALMS, CITY OF BRADENTON, FL I interns and provided direction to permit Reviewed and processed all planning and technicians and administrative staff. zoning entitlements including site plan TOWN OF DAVIE, DAVIE,FL I Planner II approval,vacation right of way,and art. who performed specialized research The project included 96 units of affordable work in assembling and analyzing social, housing constructed with tax credits. economic,land use,and other data to 50 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA CHRISTOPHER GRATZ, AICP PLANNING support the activities of the town planning and zoning program. plans and policies to meet the needs of the community.Assisted Reviewed requested changes to the town's comprehensive land with code enforcement matters.Responsible for resolving land use plan,reviewed and coordinated site plan reviews,plats, use and development issues and conflicts.Worked directly with plat note amendments,developer's agreements,delegation the Planning Commission,City Council and other local boards requests,processed variances,rezoning applications,special and provided relevant report information to these bodies as permits and vacations of right-of-way and easements. well as City Council and coordinates applicable agenda items Prepared and presented reports to the planning and zoning for processing.Performed required on-site inspections for board and site plan committee.Provided expert testimony at compliance with development plans and provided technical and code compliance hearings,assisted the public at the counter, professional advice;presentations to boards,commissions,civic responded to inquiries made by the media,and represented groups and the general public.Provided information on land use the town at intergovernmental meetings.Established and applications,ordinances,Euclidean and Form-Based Codes,plans maintained effective working relationships with citizens, and related planning programs or regulations to architects, developers,lawyers,and politicians.Provided direction to permit engineers,developers,contractors,owners,community groups technicians,administrative staff,advised planning and zoning and interested persons.Prepared a variety of studies,reports, managers and mentored junior planners. and related information for planning and zoning decision- making purposes;coordinates department activities with other BROWARD COUNTY,BROWARD, FL I Planner prepared data city departments and outside agencies as needed.Supervised for the county demographer and researched demographic Zoning Technician and GIS Planner.Assisted in the development information requests.Corrected boundaries for census 2000. and implementation of zoning,subdivision regulations,capital Responsible for verification of compliance determinations and improvement plans,land use plans,annexation studies and reviewing plans for compliance with the Future Unincorporated codes to meet the City's needs. Area Land Use Map Series.Represented the division at civic association and intergovernmental meetings,coordinated the CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PA I Historic Preservation Planning efforts of eight(8)separate agencies to provide traffic calming Intern,performed administrative duties,including meetings assistance for residents.Participated in the development of with property owners,prepared documents for Historic requests for letters of interest and evaluated qualifications Review Commission Meetings,maintenance of files,prepared to determine budget scope for services for local area studies. correspondence,revised the format of the Historic Review Created and maintained a database for section project Commission's District Design Guidelines;compiled for the use in tracking system.Researched and complied the county's training future interns,a manual of procedures and documents intergovernmental coordination element which was found in showing how the City administers its Historic Preservation compliance. Ordinance. CITY OF BRADENTON, BRADENTON, FL I Development Services and Zoning Manger and Acting Planning and Community Development Director who performed a variety of routine and complex administrative,technical and professional work in the areas of development services,planning programs,zoning, redevelopment,and implementation of land use and related municipal plans and policies.Reviewed and processed site plans,subdivision plans,land use atlas amendments,planned development projects,variances,and special uses permits. Performed studies and assessments of current and potential alternative lands uses as well as the preparation of land use GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 51 DocuSign Envelope ID 4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA John Kulpa, Ph.D. is a senior program manager with 39 years of experience in traffic analysis, transit, rail, highway development and large-scale multi- discipline and multi-modal transportation programs. His experience covers the • entire range of transportation systems management and planning techniques including transit operations, demand management strategies, parking management and facility design, congestion management, implementation of traffic improvements and innovative technologies. • t, 1"t MIAMI DADE COUNTY GENERAL and ride facility at Florida International JOH ENGINEERING CONSULTANT,DEPARTMENT University and Tamiami Station at SW OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC 147th Avenue.Both facilities will provide KULPA, PH.D. WORKS, MIAMI,FL I Project Manager alternative transit hubs and connections who led a team of consultants to develop to support the development of the Bus the environmental documentation and Express Rapid Transit network being MULTIMODAL TRANSIT operating scenarios for the 20-mile- developing throughout Miami-Dade County. long SMART plan corridor running from the existing Dadeland South Metrorail NW 27TH AVENUE CORRIDOR PD&E STUDY, HNTB Corporation FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI,FL I Deputy station to Florida City.Tasks included alignment definition,screening of Project Manager for this study that follows Years of Experience alternatives,station site identification, upon the Record of Decision secured from 39 Years environmental analysis,cost-estimating, the FTA in 2007 for elevated heavy rail in and public outreach.Identified an the corridor.Alternatives included Bus EDUCAI ION innovative alternative for the project that Rapid Transit and a heavy rail extension Ph.D., Business Management, included the introduction of connected both at-grade and elevated in the original LaSalle University,1997 and autonomous vehicle technology in 2007 configuration.Led the transit the future.Secured locally preferred planning and operational evaluation tasks, M.S., Urban and Environmental as well as the layout of several operational Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic alternative in August 2018. scenarios. Institute,1980 GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT B.A., Political Science, (GEC)TRANSIT AND MULTIMODAL KENDALL CORRIDOR PD&E STUDY, FDOT New York University,1979 SUPPORT,FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI,FL DISTRICT 6, MIAMI, FL Deputy Project Senior Consultant who supported the Manager evaluating various transit Prime consultant in the evaluation of alternatives to develop along a heavily various PD&E efforts and special studies congested 10 mile long corridor.This is such as the introduction of at-grade rail one of the key corridors for developing service in various urban contexts to inform the SMART plan in Miami and alternatives the process for the Miami-Dade corridors include Bus Rapid Transit,Light Rail and under development. Heavy rail transit both at-grade and elevated. PARK AND RIDE FACILITY DESIGN IN SUPPORT OF MDX EXPRESS BUS EAST AND WEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR SERVICES,MIAMI DADE DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT, TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS, MIAMI,FL I Senior Consultant who MIAMI,FL Project Manager whose supported the development of final design responsibilities entailed leading a team plans for both the Panther Station park of 18 subconsultants in concert with the 52 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA JOHN KULPA, PH.D. MULTI-MODAL TRANSIT program manager under the direction of Miami-Dade Transit UPTOWN HOUSTON DEDICATED BUS LANES AND TRANSIT for this 12-mile-long rail transit corridor study running through CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS,UPTOWN HOUSTON, the heart of Miami-Dade County.Tasks included alignment HOUSTON,TX I Project Manager who developed the definition,screening of alternatives,station site identification, environmental documentation for a two-mile-long dedicated environmental analysis,cost-estimating and public outreach. busway to provide frequent and efficient bus service to the Uptown Houston area.Received a categorical exclusion for the NORTH CORRIDOR METRORAIL EXTENSION,SUPPLEMENTAL dedicated bus lanes in March of 2014 from the FTA and anticipate DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (SDEIS), MIAMI- a categorical exclusion finding from the FTA on the Uptown- DADE TRANSIT,MIAMI,FL I Project Manager responsible for Bellaire Transit Center in the spring of 2015. the development of a SDEIS for this 9.5-mile-long,rail-transit, corridor study running from the existing Metrorail line north AUSTIN TO SAN ANTONIO PASSENGER RAIL ENVIRONMENTAL along 27th Avenue to the Broward County line.Tasks included IMPACT STATEMENT(EIS)/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, coordinating the development and review of a SDEIS to meet FTA LONE STAR RAIL DISTRICT,SAN MARCOS,TX I Project Manager and Miami-Dade requirements.Secured a record of decision from responsible for leading the alternative alignment definition the FTA in April 2007. and EIS for this 117-mile-long rail segment planned for the existing Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR)freight rail corridor. TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES,CITY Key tasks included:alignment definition,screening of OF MIAMI, FL I Project Manager who supported the city in alternatives,station site identification,conceptual engineering, developing the streetcar and downtown trolley circulator environmental analysis,cost-estimating,financial planning, services.Worked closely with city staff to coordinate the design interagency coordination,UPRR interface and public outreach. of a ten-mile-long streetcar system to connect key areas of Responsibilities entailed leading a multidisciplinary team of 18 Miami with the downtown.Key challenges included utility subconsultants under the direction of the Lone Star Rail District. coordination and coordinating the on-street streetcar operation with vehicular traffic,pedestrians,bicyclists and on-street GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT FOR TRANSIT SERVICES,VIA parking considerations. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT,BEXAR COUNTY,SAN ANTONIO,TX Project Director whose responsibilities entailed leading a varied GEC,MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY, MIAMI, FL Iteam of transit professionals,architects,designers,and planners Transportation Planner who supported the GEC team in in a series of assignments to develop transit services in VIA's developing project specific visioning plans,concept reports service area of Bexar County,Texas.Key tasks included:the and a managed lanes study for the expressway system.Tasks development of a 2035 System Plan which could include various included:evaluating transit and freeway improvement options, transit modes including Bus Rapid Transit,streetcar,light rail, BRT option for the Dolphin Expressway,park-and-ride facility express buses and high occupancy vehicle/high occupancy toll design and the evaluation of managed high occupancy vehicle lanes on freeway segments;the development of an initial starter and toll lanes. segment feasibility study for a fixed rail streetcar system in the CENTRAL CORRIDOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY downtown core of San Antonio;and an evaluation of current ENGINEERING,CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION paratransit services in Bexar County operated by VIA.All these AUTHORITY,AUSTIN,TX I Senior Consultant who provided quality assignments involve close coordination with VIA,the City of San assurance,quality control and technical review of alternative Antonio,Bexar County,and a myriad of federal,state,and local operating scenarios and Federal Transit Administration(FTA) agencies,as well as a very robust public involvement element coordination on Small Starts application and process. with multiple workshops,summits and public outreach meetings. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 53 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Ytve Guerrera has 20 years of experience in transportation engineering, planning, design and project management. Ytve's primary areas of focus have been project development, transportation planning, corridor analyses and traffic engineering. Ytve is proficient in VISSIM, SYNCHRO/SIMTRAFFIC, CORSIM, HCS, LOSPIan, AutoCAD, MicroStation, MS Access, FORTRAN and JAVA computer applications. 44ti lose GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES(GEC),MIAMI-DADE SERVICES,MIAMI-DADE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY(MDX),MIAMI, METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION YTVE FL�Traffic Project Manager responsible for (MPO), MIAMI,FL I Project Manager multiple projects in the areas of project responsible for overseeing a variety of task GUERRERA, PE development,transportation planning and work orders that consider complex traffic traffic and revenue studies.Supported engineering analysis. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/ the development and execution of the MICROSIMULATION planning program.The program includes ATLANTIC GREENWAY NETWORK MASTER preparation of project development and PLAN REVIEW SERVICES,CITY OF MIAMI environment(PD&E)project cost estimates, BEACH, MIAMI BEACH, FL Senior Project HNTB Corporation scope of work development,procurement Engineer responsible for reviewing the preparation,contract negotiations, Atlantic Greenway Network Master Plan in Years of Experience management of PD&E consultant work in order to determine whether the document 20 Years the completion of projects,updates to the included most of the guidelines currently long range transportation plan(LRTP), available to perform this type of study. EDUCATION traffic analysis,and coordination with DISTRICTWIDE PLAN REVIEW M.S. Civil Engineering, traffic and revenue consultants in the SERVICES,FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Florida International University,2004 development of open road tolling(ORT) TRANSPORTATION (FDOT)DISTRICT 4, B.S., Civil Engineering, plans for the system. DISTRICTWIDE, FL 1 Senior Project Engineer University of Miami,1999 SR 874 AT SW 72ND STREET INTERCHANGE who reviewed the traffic signalization plans JUSTIFICATION REPORT, MDX, MIAMI, FL for the intersection of 1-75 at Griffin Road PROFESSIONAL REGISI RAI IONS Traffic Engineering Project Manager for in order to ensure that the design complied Professional Engineer- Florida (2011): the proposed interchange with SR 874 at with all FDOT standards and specifications. Georgia (2011) SW 72nd Street following state and federal TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES,MIAMI guidelines.The study area extends along WORLD CENTER, MIAMI, FL I Senior Project three miles of SR 874 from south of Kendall Engineer who reviewed the traffic study Drive to SR 826.Six interchange concepts developed.The review included assessment with three alternatives were analyzed with of the Draft Traffic study already developed HCS,SYNCHRO and CORSIM. and review of electronic data available that TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SUPPORT could be used to complete the analysis. SERVICES,CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI,FL I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVIEW SERVICES, Project Manager responsible for managing SLS HOTEL SOUTH BEACH,MIAMI,FL and overseeing the development of several Senior Project Engineer responsible work orders that consider transportation for reviewing the methodology and improvements and traffic analysis for calculations of trip generation and traffic different areas within the jurisdiction of distribution developed for the SLS Hotel the City of Miami. South Beach. 54 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA YTVE GUERRERA, PE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/MICROSIMULATION DISTRICTWIDE PD&E TRAFFIC CONSULTANT,FDOT DISTRICT 6, for reasonableness the K30 and D30 factors used to reduce MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I Lead Traffic Engineer,Task Manager the average daily volumes obtained from the travel demand and Project Manager for various task work orders that have forecasting model to peak hour volumes.Calibrated simulation ranged from development of Scoping Reports to traffic analysis files based on existing traffic conditions that served as the base of different alternatives for roadways improvements to be for the simulation of future conditions implemented at the 1-95 Golden Glades Interchange with SR 826/ PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL 1-395 TO PORT BOULEVARD, FDOT Palmetto Expressway. DISTRICT 6, MIAMI, FL I Lead Traffic Engineer and Task Manager DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CIRCULATOR STUDY, DOWNTOWN for the traffic analysis of the internal roadways within the Port DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(DDE), FORT LAUDERDALE, FL I Lead of Miami.Responsible for developing a traffic data collection Traffic Engineer and Task Manager for the traffic simulation plan for the various roadways located within the Port of analysis to be included in the Environmental Assessment Report Miami,which required seven-day traffic counts.Processed and developed for this multi-modal study.Analyzed existing and summarized all the data collected for reasonableness.Led the future traffic conditions using VISSIM as the microsimulation development of VISSIM models for existing conditions during package and evaluated alternative proposed alignments of the peak hours within the Port of Miami and prepared the a future rail transit system in Downtown Ft.Lauderdale.The Traffic Technical Memorandum submitted to FDOT District 6.This proposed improvements are multi-modal in nature as they information was used to determine the traffic operations within include bus,rail and roadway improvements. the Port of Miami once the proposed Tunnel is implemented. DISTRICTWIDE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SHORT RANGE PROJECT 1-75 PD&E STUDY FROM MOCCASIN WALLOW ROAD TO FLETCHER DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT,FDOT DISTRICT 6,DISTRICTWIDE, AVENUE, FDOT DISTRICT 7,TAMPA, FL I Lead Traffic Engineer and FL I Project Engineer and Assistant Project Manager to cover Task Manager for the Traffic Analysis of the southern portion a range of miscellaneous tasks such as developing ESALs of this 40-mile project for 1-75(from Mocasin Wallow Road to calculations,performing intersection analyses and assisting SR 301).Task Manager for the Miami office who coordinated the Department with the assessment of the current Traffic with two other responsible offices.The traffic analysis was Monitoring Program.Assisted the Department with the completed using different types of traffic analysis software Enhanced Pavement Management System which includes such as HCS,Synchro and VISSIM.The traffic analysis required reviewing the roadway segments that have been selected to the evaluation of Existing Conditions along the corridor,as undergo pavement rehabilitation in order to identify additional well as the evaluation of the No-Build option together with deficiencies that should be resolved in conjunction with three Build Alternatives for the year 2030.Evaluation of future pavement rehabilitation.The objective of this task is to develop improvements was required in order to accommodate future more accurate cost estimates that will account for repair and traffic demand. construction of additional roadway features that need to be addressed in the resurfacing,restoration and rehabilitation DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CIRCULATOR STUDY, DOWNTOWN projects. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(DDE),FORT LAUDERDALE, FL I Lead Traffic Engineer and Task Manager for the traffic simulation MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT INTERMODAL CENTER analysis to be included in the Environmental Assessment Report TRAFFIC SIMULATION STUDY,FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI,FL I developed for this multimodal study.Analyzed existing and Project Engineer responsible for reviewing and processing the future traffic conditions using VISSIM as the microsimulation traffic counts received from the field.Calculated and balanced package and evaluated alternative proposed alignments of the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes for a future rail transit system.The proposed improvements are existing conditions.Developed peak and daily traffic volume multimodal in nature as they include bus,rail and roadway ratios and directional distribution factors in order to check improvements. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 55 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Girish Kumar is highly experienced and proficient in the development and review of design plans and systems engineering reports for transportation management and operation strategies, such as adaptive signal control, retiming, active traffic management, traffic incident management, transit signal priority and connected vehicle technology. Girish has also provided reviews for Concept of Operations and intelligent transportation systems (ITS) functional requirements for transit corridors. No-44 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE framework developed for the region is GIRISH AND OPERATIONS(TSM&O)TECHNICAL expected to serve as a model throughout SUPPORT SERVICES,FLORIDA the country.The RCTO will facilitate the KUMAR, PE, PTOE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION deployment of each individual managed (FDOT)DISTRICT 6, MIAMI-DADE AND lanes facility as a part of an overall MONROE COUNTIES,FL I Project Manager interconnected multi-jurisdictional network responsible for supporting the Department to function and operate as a seamless, in developing the TSM&O Program. region-wide network of unobstructed Responsible for developing the TSM&O managed lanes utilizing variable toll and HNTB Corporation strategic plan document;developing congestion pricing strategies. the TSM&0 presentations and outreach rears of Lxperience materials;coordinating activities of SR 90/SW 8TH STREET ASCT PILOT 30 Years the District 6 TSM&O team with Central PROJECT,FDOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI-DADE Office TSM&O task team,Federal Highway COUNTY, FL Chief Engineer responsible EDUCATION Administration,Miami-Dade Transportation for overseeing the development of the M.S.,Civil Engineering, Planning Organization(TPO),Miami-Dade Pilot Project procurement documents Florida Institute of Technology,1993 County Department of Transportation for the deployment of an adaptive signal and Public Works(DTPW)and other control system along SW 8th Street from B.S., Civil Engineering, SW 67th Avenue(east of SR 826/Palmetto Indian Institute of Technology,1990 regional stakeholders,SW 8th Street and NW 119th Street adaptive signal control Expressway)to SW 142nd Avenue(west of technology(ASCT)pilot projects planning SR 821/Florida's Turnpike)This 7.5 mile and f'KOrtSSiuNAL KtiilSi RAI IONS and procurement document development, 29-signalized intersection corridor is the Professional Engineer- Florida (1997) developing and implementing the largest ASCT Pilot Project deployment in Professional Traffic Operations districtwide signal retiming initiative and Florida and the first deployment in Miami- Engineer(2000) overseeing the districtwide work zone/ Dade County. maintenance of traffic(MOT)support SR 924/NW 119 STREET ASCT PILOT initiatives. PROJECT,FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI-DADE REGIONAL CONCEPT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTY,FL I Chief Engineer responsible OPERATIONS(RCTO),FDOT DISTRICT 6, for overseeing the development of the Pilot MIAMI, FL QA/OC Advisor for the Project procurement documents for the development of a RCTO document deployment of an adaptive signal control for a managed lane network(MLN)in system along NW 119th Street from eastern South Florida.The MLN RCTO will be a terminus of SR 924 Gratigny Parkway(west groundbreaking effort which is partially of NW 32nd Avenue)to NW 5th Avenue funded by FHWA's Value Pricing Pilot (east of 1-9 5)and along SR 9/NW 27th Program,and as such the foundational Avenue from NW 110th Street to NW 119th Street.This three-mile and 15-signalized 56 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862AO8CDA GIRISH KUMAR, PE, PTOE intersection corridor includes next generation traffic signal of alignment alternatives,associated environmental analyses controllers upgrade,new video detection system,new fiber optic and supporting technical documents.The Fiesta Way Bridges cable based communications system and more. connect the residents of the finger islands over the canals to the City of Fort Lauderdale. SR 5/US 1/OVERSEAS HIGHWAY AT BLIMP ROAD, FDOT DISTRICT 6, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I Project Manager DISTRICTWIDE GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT(GPC) responsible for the preparation of a safety study investigating SYSTEMS,FDOT DISTRICT 4,FORT LAUDERDALE,FL I Technical existing roadway and traffic conditions within the Cudjoe Curve Advisor to the team for this work-order based contract.Oversaw along US 1.Components of the study included,data collection, work related to project traffic development,interchange field observations,sight distance analysis,guardrail analysis, operations analysis,travel demand forecasting using the lighting justification,crash data review and preparation of safety Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure study with recommendations. and GIS database development and mapping,among other NE 36TH STREET(SR 25)AT NE 1ST AVENUE RECTANGULAR miscellaneous,system level planning activities.Served as project engineer,task manager,project manager and RAPID FLASH BEACON (RRFB) EVALUATION,FDOT DISTRICT 6, technical advisor on various GPC teams over a nine-year MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL I Project Manager responsible for period.Performed,oversaw and peer reviewed project traffic the preparation of a technical memorandum investigating development,PD&E Design Traffic Technical Memorandum, the effectiveness of recently installed high emphasis marked interchange operations analysis,travel demand forecasting crosswalks and RRFB at this intersection.Components of the and GIS database development and mapping,among other project included field observations pertaining to compliance of miscellaneous planning activities. drivers and pedestrians to the RRFB augmented crosswalks. DISTRICTWIDE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY STUDIES, DISTRICTWIDE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY STUDIES, FOOT DISTRICT 6,MIAMI-DADE AND MONROE COUNTIES,FL FDOT DISTRICT 4, DISTRICTWIDE, FL I Safety Studies Team Project Manager for this task-work order based contract who Leader and Project Manager on this work-order based contract. performed numerous intersection and arterial studies.Studies Provided technical consultations and QA/QC on several task word involved data collection,crash data analysis,traffic operational order assignments. analysis,conceptual design,evaluation of improvement DISTRICTWIDE ITS TECHNICAL CONSULTANT,FDOT DISTRICT 6, alternatives and benefit-cost analysis.Recently completed MIAMI-DADE AND MONROE COUNTIES, FL I Project Manager, assignments include LeJeune Road Access Management Study, Director and QA Manager for District 6 ITS services who led NW/NE 163rd Street Access Management and Safety Study,SW 1st all major ITS projects/initiatives in the District.Some major Street Arterial Study,Collins Avenue/13th Street Signal Warrant accomplishments include 1-75,1-195,1-395,SR 826,US 1(Keys), Analysis and SW 8th Street Study.Research and statistics-related 95 Express Phase 1 ITS deployments,Miami-Dade TIM program, assignments include evaluation of districtwide fatal crashes and SR 826 Incident Operation Plans,SunGuide®Incident Response fixed-object crashes. Manual,development of the Road Ranger Resource Guide and GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES, MIAMI DADE various procurement documents,including the performance EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY(MDX),MIAMI,FL I Project Advisor based ITS maintenance contracts. and Lead Traffic Engineer since 2006 who has been involved in LAS OLAS BRIDGES PD&E SERVICES, FDOT DISTRICT 4, BROWARD numerous planning,travel demand forecasts,traffic analysis, COUNTY, FL I Senior Traffic Engineer for this study to evaluate and safety studies on MDX's five roadways comprising more than the replacement of the existing low-level bridges.The study will 33 centerline miles of some of the busiest tolled expressways involve preliminary engineering design,including the evaluation and interchange systems in Florida. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 57 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Juan Calderon has 20 years of experience in traffic and transportation engineering and has been involved in managing multiple traffic and planning 11::.' :, engineering projects with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Within FDOT related contracts, he has participated actively in preliminary engineering reports, design projects, planning, development of alternatives, conceptual designs, corridor studies, simulation, GIS, as well as, managing 11004 projects that encompassed traffic impact studies, traffic circulation, modeling, and traffic forecasting. IRON TRIANGLE, MIAMI,FL I This project development,provides documentation for JUAN intends to provide alternatives for the Design Traffic Technical Memorandum. improvements at the interchange of SR 112/ CALDERON, PE, PTOE, PTP LeJeune Road/Okeechobee Road.As part DISTRICTWIDE DATA COLLECTION, FOOT of the tasks assigned includes evaluation DISTRICT 4,MIAMI, FL Project Manager of existing conditions,traffic data responsible for the supervision of the TRAFFIC OPERATIONS collection including big data evaluation traffic data collection and analysis for for origin-destinations(HERE,Bluetooth the Statistics Unit in the Planning Office. and Streetlight),operational analysis Project's assignments include 24,48 CALTRAN Engineering Group, Inc. microsimulation model development, and 72 hrs.Traffic counts,researching provide documentation for the Design and recording data into the Roadway rears of txpetlence Traffic Technical Memorandum(DTTM). Characteristics databases,Straight 20 Years Conceptual improvements assessment Line Diagrams(SLD),traffic counts, for Tier 1 and Tier 2 including long and jurisdictional transfers and GIS services. LOUCAI ION short term improvements;Provide final TRAFFIC OPERATIONS DISTRICTWIDE DATA M.S.,Civil Engineering, recommendations,assist in cost estimates COLLECTION SERVICES,FOOT DISTRICT 4, Florida International University,1999 and support in public involvement. FL I Project Manager providing consulting B.S., Civil Engineering, TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS SUPPORT services to assure uniform procedures for University Santo Tomas,1997 NO.1 AND 3,FOOT DISTRICT 6,FL I the inspection and reporting of District Responsible for providing engineering Maintenance Office contracts,agreements, FKUr LJz iUNAL KLGIS I KAI IONS services to support the Transportation and permits.Services provided include, Professional Engineer- Florida Statistics Unit of the Planning but are not limited to,maintenance, (2002) Environmental Management Office engineering,inspection and contract Professional Traffic Operations District 6 by performing the following administration for the miscellaneous Engineer (2004) services PTMS design,traffic data maintenance projects assigned. Professional Transportation Planner collection(over 2,000 traffic stations DOWNTOWN MIAMI COMPLETE STREETS, and over 1,000 miles of road inventories) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,MIAMI, FL in charge of enhanced pavement Project Manager responsible for traffic- management program and reporting. engineering services to complete a 1-95 CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY, MIAMI, feasibility study to apply a Complete Street FL Responsible for all traffic data concept to SW/SE 1st Street,between collection including big data evaluation SW 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard. (HERE,Bluetooth and Streetlight)for origin- Tasks included provided an existing destinations.Documentation of existing condition analysis,traffic analysis for conditions,and support of operational no built and built conditions and transit analysis microsimulation model system operation analysis. 58 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA JUAN CALDERON, PE, PTOE, PTP TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GABLES COMPREHENSIVE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN, maintained.Conducted field reviews to cross check against CITY OF CORAL GABLES, FL I Project Manager responsible for if work needs are completed adequately.Also,assisted in GIS the evaluation of multimodal projects and transportation traffic efforts and data collection for legal purposes. calming plan with the vision to support the City developing a framework and analysis of existing and future conditions, GPC-V09 COMPLETE STREETS,MIAMI DADE METROPOLITAN civic engagement and putting ideas into action as well as a PLANNING ORGANIZATION, FL I Responsible for the development recommendation and prioritization of funding. of the latest Miami-Dade Complete Street Manual with responsibilities that included right-of-way widths assessments SR 708/BLUE HERON BLVD AND AVENUE SOUTH, FDOT and level of service calculations for the three corridors DISTRICT 4, FL I Project consisted of intersection improvement identified for existing and future conditions that are were at Blue Heron and Avenue South.Currently the intersection has included in the manual as sample projects(SW 27th Avenue sub-standard curb radius at all four corners.Responsibilities to between NW 11th Street and US 1;NW 7th Avenue between NW this modification included new mast arms and lighting poles. 119th Street and NW 12th Street and Miami Avenue between NW 42nd Street and the Miami River). TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SAFETY STUDY,C9845, FDOT DISTRICT 4, FL I Project Manager responsible for providing DISTRICTWIDE FREIGHT AND LOGISTICS CONSULTANT, C9D04, traffic engineering services to the department through traffic FDOT DISTRICT 6,FL I Project Manager responsible for assist operations and safety studies such as ramp safety studies,spot FDOT District 6 to evaluate freight plans,to develop freight speed studies,safe curve speed studies,gap studies. strategies with the objective to incorporate within future or ongoing projects.Review and collect data related to freight DISTRICTWIDE MODAL DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES, project.Perform plans reviews.Perform audits to transit,airport FDOT DISTRICT 4, BROWARD AND PALM BEACH COUNTIES, and seaport projects and coordinate with District and private FL I Collected data for assessing at-grade rail crossing traffic stakeholders,as necessary. delay impacts using video cameras.Each crossing utilized from three to four cameras,depending on their complexity and sight TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STUDIES,C8W68,FDOT DISTRICT 6, FL distances.Observations made regarding the overall operation Project Manager responsible for providing traffic engineering of the railway crossings were updated.The data collected was services to the department through traffic operations and safety reviewed and summarized,as well as the video data of the studies such as turning movement counts,intersection approach locations assigned.Data analysis produced the statistics for counts,travel time and delay,spot speed studies amongst each crossing location.Statistics collected included delay per others along Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. gate closing event(vehicle-minutes),and average number of vehicles in the queue,among others.These statistics were DISTRICTWIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT aggregated to be compared by railroad corridor and by county. SERVICES,MIAMI DOWNTOWN FREIGHT TRAFFIC DATA The number of engines and rail-cars was collected. COLLECTION, FDOT DISTRICT 6, FL I Project Manager responsible for providing traffic engineering services to the department. MAINTENANCE AND PERMIT INSPECTION,CONTRACT NO. Recent task includes a task work order to provide traffic data C9G32, FDOT DISTRICT 6, FL I Project Manager overseeing all collection services as part of the Miami Downtown Freight Traffic on-site activities.Provided on-site support in the collection of Data Collection within Miami-Dade County. Maintenance RCI features.Quality control of data collected as well as data inputted into the RCI mainframe to ensure accuracy GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFC) 2019-109-ND 59 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA Omar Al-Sahili brings six years of experience in transportation and highway engineering and specializes in the preparation of safety performance studies using the predictive analysis method. Omar's experience includes the development of safety performance functions and crash modification factors by analyzing the historical crash data on the roadway networks and linking the various roadway geometric conditions with the probability of crash occurrence. Therefore, by understanding the contributing roadway conditions that increase the likelihood of a crash, the proper safety countermeasures are proposed to improve the safety conditions on the roads. 1-395/SR836 INTERCHANGE DESIGN- interchange access requests and OMAR BUILD(DB)PROJECT IN DOWNTOWN interchange justification reports for AL-SAHILI, El MIAMI FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF interstates and limited access facilities in TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) DISTRICT 6, South Florida.Prepared project schedules, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/ MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL I This project's time frames,long range estimates, SAFETY scope includes performing plan reviews quantity estimates and pay items for for District 6 for the proposed I-395\SR836 projects.Reviewed shop drawings, DB project.Responsible for preparing a submittal and revisions to be released for HNTB Corporation safety performance study for the request construction.Prepared traffic control plans for proposal design using the predictive for work zones,freeway design submittals, Years or Lxper fence analysis method from the Highway Safety pavement design reports,site inventory 6 Years Manual to evaluate the safety measures of visits and performing data collection tasks. the proposed design against the proposed alternative technical concepts developed TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING EDUCATION SERVICES, NATIONAL CENTER OF by the DB team. M.S.,Transportation and Highway SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,WEST BANK, Engineering, University of Central 1-95 SW 10TH STREET PD&E STUDY, FDOT JERUSALEM I Transportation Engineer Florida, 2017 DISTRICT 4,FORT LAUDERDALE, FL I who was responsible for a variety of B.S., Civil Engineering, Roadway Engineer who supported the transportation and planning tasks. An-Najah National University, 2014 completion of the NEPA documentation for Prepared design plans for intersections, capacity and operational improvements highways,roundabouts and neighborhoods. -r Ur . luNAL ntGiJ i KNI IUN along 1-95 from just south of SW 10th Completed Traffic Impact Assessment Engineering Intern Florida (2017) Street to just north of Hillsboro Boulevard. studies for multi-use retail,and university The project also includes improvements campus developments.Developed along both SW 10th Street and Hillsboro transportation system managements Boulevard. and long-term transportation plans to improve accessibility,reduce congestion VARIOUS PROJECTS, FDOT DISTRICTS 4 and enhance traffic safety for the study AND DISTRICT 6,DISTRICTWIDE,FL I urban areas.Prepared strategic and Roadway Engineer for various freeway physical development plans to allocate and Interstate design projects in the appropriate transportation infrastructure South Florida region.Participated in the improvements(design of future roadway plan production process and preparing network)and land use for a 20-year period. the appropriate plans for each phase of the submittal.Reviewed and prepared 60 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA Dominic Vanchure has extensive experience reviewing development plans that intersect or encroach into the public right-of-way and developed a set of guidelines and work flows for review of the proposed site plans. This included • traffic reports, signal warrants, pavement designs, geotechnical reports, site A plans, drainage reports, maintenance of traffic plans, and right-of-way maps. He has reviewed more than 100 permit applications for the Florida Department ik le of Transportation, all of which were unique and ranged in complexity. 4 9 SR 76/KANNER HIGHWAY FROM CR-711/ crossing design,and driveway tie-ins. PRATT WHITNEY ROAD TO SOUTHWEST Other responsibilities included plan sheets, DOMINIC LOCKS ROAD, FDOT DISTRICT 4,STUART, pavement design report,typical section VANCHURE, PE FL I Project Designer responsible for package,community awareness plan, roadway horizontal and vertical geometric engineering report,the preliminary right of design,intersection design and related way documentation.This project consisted ROADWAY plan sheets,driveway tie-ins,and gravity of widening Johnson Street for 1.7 miles to walls.Responsible for 3D design modeling accommodate bike lanes and sidewalks on of roadway geometry of main alignment both sides of the minor arterial. HNTB Corporation and side streets,intersection plateauing NORTHEAST 9TH STREET AT A1A and swales and driveway tie-ins/swales. This project consisted of complete PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,FDOT DISTRICT 4, Years or Experience reconstruction to raise the road three feet, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL I Project 5 Years widening from two to four travel lanes,the Designer responsible for the design addition of a median and median left-turn of elevated pedestrian patio/access to EDUCATION lanes,drainage and utility relocations. local businesses.The project involved B.S., Civil Engineering, a complete 3D design of the area to Florida State University, 2012 I-75/SR-93 AT GRIFFIN ROAD alleviate the Americans with Disabilities M.E., Structural Engineering, INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS,FDOT Act noncompliance.Responsible for design Florida State University,2013 DISTRICT 4, BROWARD COUNTY,FL I and respective detailed plans of pedestrian Project Designer responsible for quantity ramps,steps,gravity walls,handrails, estimates,drainage map,proposed sidewalks,grading plan,demolition PkOr ES�IOivAL Rt61I RAI IONS drainage structure locations,plan sheets. plan,and utility coordination within an Professional Engineer- Florida (2016) Project included widening and partial extremely limited project area. reconstruction of the northbound 1-75 on- off ramps,construction of new acceleration SR-810/HILLSBORO BOULEVARD FROM lane,a bridge widening,modification of the MILITARY TRAIL TO SR-5/US-1,FDOT off-ramp;milling,resurfacing and widening DISTRICT 4,CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, of Griffin Road for the addition of buffered FL Project Designer responsible for bike lanes and sidewalk;the construction design calculations,plan sheets,and of dual left-turn lanes. quantity estimates for mast arm signal structures and cantilever sign structure. JOHNSON STREET FROM NORTH 30TH Other responsibilities include special ROAD TO NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY/US-1, pavement marking detail sheets and FDOT DISTRICT 4,CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, maintenance of traffic quantities for this FL I Project Designer responsible for 2.8 mile widening and resurfacing project roadway horizontal and vertical geometric of an urban arterial multi-lane highway. design,intersection designs,railroad GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 61 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA SECTION 3 Approach & Methodology 0 R'+ rD rt 0 0 0 0 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA HNTB provides traffic and transportation engineering review services like this project to the City of Miami, Miami-Dade County, Miami Dade County Expressway Authority, Miami Dade Aviation Department, FDOT Districts 4 and 6. Having previously conducted and reviewed numerous traffic studies, our team has the expertise and experience to provide effective traffic study reviews and offer ideas or concepts for consideration and review to enhance safety APPROACH AND and operations. METHODOLOGY The HNTB Team understands the importance of a comprehensive and accurate traffic study to provide a base of information upon which to develop cost-effective means to improve safety and operational efficiency. Technology is INTRODUCTION: playing a bigger role in how these solutions are The City of Miami Beach continues to promote, deployed in a progressively advanced approach encourage and support real estate development, of connecting vehicles with traffic signals and both new and redeveloped, and to ensure each other while maintaining safety as the negative transportation impacts are avoided, driving factor. With extensive experience in both minimized and mitigated. The City also producing and reviewing various levels of traffic promotes and encourages the use of transit, impact studies, we are cognizant of the potential bicycles and pedestrian facilities to reduce impacts a development may have on state the negative impact of the personal vehicle and local street networks. For example, HNTB use. However, it is becoming increasingly prepared a site selection analysis for the City of important that new innovative approaches and Miami for Marlins Park and followed that up with strategies are developed to address and mitigate a detailed study of parking conditions in Little current and future traffic challenges as traffic Havana coupled with a traffic management impacts continue to escalate due to increased plan for event operations at the stadium. Many development and as the number of visitors to of HNTB's traffic and transit management the City as a premier international destination recommendations have been implemented in continues to increase. managing traffic flows to and from events at this major sports venue. To assist in reviewing proposed development's traffic impact studies and in evaluating proposed The focus of this project is reviewing technical mitigation measures for negative transportation traffic impact studies performed by developers' impacts, the City will be selecting a pool of traffic consultants as well as peer review of consultants. studies conducted by the City of Miami Beach staff to ensure a safe and efficient multi-modal HNTB prides itself on providing engineering transportation system operating at acceptable services predominantly to government agencies levels of service in the City of Miami Beach to the as opposed to private developers including benefit of the city residents and visitors. Traffic cities, counties, state and federal transportation Control Measures (TCM) will be considered during agencies which removes the concern of any traffic study reviews to assist the developer to conflict of interests. Locally in South Florida, consider implementing physical improvements 62 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFD 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F562607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA and/or strategies to encourage people to use public transportation, car and van pools, bicycles, and encourage people to walk by providing and THE HNTB TEAM connecting sidewalks with safe and adequate crosswalks. As an example, HNTB recently supported the Village of Key Biscayne with the evaluation of the potential traffic impacts of the ULTRA music festival held on HNTB Corporation has Virginia Key. We developed and recommended specific mitigation measures and traffic management strategies to address those impacts. selected a diverse and During the ULTRA music festival, HNTB assisted the Village, City of quality team on this Miami, Miami-Dade County in adopting traffic control strategies real-time project for the City of to keep traffic flowing and minimize negative impacts. Miami Beach. Committed to exceeding the City's REVIEW PROCESS expectations, our Rafiq Alqasem, PE, PTOE, will serve as the project manager for HNTB approach to project on this project. He is a hands-on project manager who will be engaged planning, management in every traffic review received from the City and will be working with all and staffing is to provide team members who may be assigned to review the documents to ensure the right professionals and consistent quality review for every project. Rafiq has been reviewing traffic bolster their work with impact studies on an on-going basis for over 25 years and has been leading a deep bench of support a team that is engaged in reviewing a large number of new developments and guidance. HNTB in the City of Miami including Miami World Center, Miami Freedom Park and Miami City Center to just name a significant sizable few developments. follows a sophisticated If specialized experts are needed in a certain study review, such as ITS, 4for4 process quality roadway design or others, Rafiq will engage the right expert(s) in all reviews work, on time,and on and will also ensure that all issues are properly addressed providing quality budget, delivered to comments, completed on-time, within task budget and completely to the the client's satisfaction City's full satisfaction. on every project as our commitment to consistent As soon as the City's Project Manager contacts HNTB's Project Manager performance. requesting a review of a traffic impact study, a face-to-face meeting or a telephone conversation will be scheduled to discuss the study to be reviewed. HNTB's offices are in the City of Miami, a short distance away from the MacArthur Causeway and typically 20 minutes to the City of Miami Beach City Hall. FIELD OBSERVATION To truly understand existing geometric and operational conditions at any traffic study location, the reviewer should go out to the project site and observe traffic operating under peak conditions. Based on the outcome of the meeting with the City of Miami Beach's project manager, a field investigation may be necessary to observe existing traffic conditions with focus on safety and operations, such as vehicle mix, travel speeds, traffic control operations and existing geometric conditions, such as horizontal/vertical curves, grades, skew, median width, visibility, pavement conditions, etc. TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING The HNTB Team has extensive experience with travel demand forecasting models, particularly locally with Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM) Version 8, which applies to Miami Beach. Future background traffic conditions are defined as expected traffic conditions on the roadway network in a specific future year without the construction of the subject development under review; while future area growth on the transportation network is determined based upon historical growth trends, GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 63 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA as well as comparisons between the 2010 and whether pedestrian and bicycle traffic is likely to 2040 traffic volumes from the SERPM tool. impact the road's level of service and the type Forecasting steps are: of control needed to ensure safe and efficient crossings. 1. Network and trip table development 2. Operation of travel demand It is expected that the traffic study under review should have a multi-modal estimate which 3. Model calibration should be justified. One way to estimate the 4. Model validation percentage breakdown of the various modes for 5. Coordination with base models any proposed development in any area is to use Travel demand forecasting requires dedicated the US Census Means of Transportation to Work experts who are specialized almost exclusively data and apply reasonable engineering judgment in this area. HNTB's Dan Beaty has extensive to account for any changes that have occurred or hands-on knowledge in SERPM and other are planned to occur such as a new bus service forecasting tools and will serve as the go-to for or bus stop. our team where his expertise is needed to verify Once the various multi-modal trips are and validate projected traffic volumes. generated, they will need to be distributed correctly based on turning movement counts TRIP GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION, collected at the study area intersections and MODE CHOICE & TRIP ASSIGNMENT on an interpolated cardinal distribution for For estimating a development impact, the the project site's traffic analysis zones (TAZs) utilization of the latest revision of the Institute of obtained from Miami-Dade Transportation Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Planning Organization (TPO) 2040 Cost Feasible Manual (TGM) is necessary. The latest TGM Plan travel demand model 2010 and 2040 data. edition released by ITE is the tenth (10th) edition. Proper use of the TGM along with a CRASH ANALYSIS good dose of engineering judgment is critical Analyzing crash data is another critical element in estimating trips, including person trips, that for many traffic engineering studies. An analysis would be broken down to pedestrians, bicycles, of crash records, including police reports, is transit and vehicular trips. It is surprising to important for identifying abnormal/predominant review numerous studies that only use the TGM crash patterns, probable causes and to develop to generate vehicular traffic while completely suitable crash countermeasures for a study ignoring the pedestrian, bicycle and transit trips. location. Experience plays a significant role in Particularly with the focus on multi-modal and developing a keen eye in identifying potential emphasizing mobility for all users, it is critical causes for crashes. Rafiq has previously that users of all potential transportation modes managed an FDOT Districtwide Operation Safety for any given development are estimated and contract for ten (10) years and is thoroughly these estimates must be used in the study to familiar with cause and effect of crash types address not only the impact of each mode users and so is Omar Al-Sahili who has four years of but also the impact of the interaction of these intense experience in safety. Our team has the modes within the area of study. One example is experience to identify potential causes for high- the number of pedestrians and bicycles that are crash locations and the alternatives remedies. projected to cross the road in front of vehicular We will be looking for appropriate and effective traffic that must be included in the analysis. The solutions to be proposed by traffic impact studies same applies to where bus stops may be located where high-crash locations are present. We will in relation to the proposed development and propose such remedies if the study does not. 64 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA EXAMPLES OF INNOVATIVE It is crucial to evaluate both cost-effective and innovative solutions to increase both safety and capacity. SOLUTIONSConsideration would be given to roundabouts, access management, signal retiming and innovative intersection treatments to address the needs of all users. A few recent examples of innovative solutions that were recommended by HNTB in Miami Beach are: • The Bayshore neighborhood was concerned • Miami Beach Senior High School traffic about speeding traffic on Chase Avenue operation was studied at the request of between Alton Road and W 37th Street, so the City of Miami Beach by HNTB. It was the City of Miami Beach requested HNTB to observed that due to the difficulty and study this area and examine the geometric congestion at the entrance to this school, and operational conditions at the many vehicles dropped-off and picked-up intersections of Chase Avenue and W 34th students by stopping on Dade Boulevard. Street. HNTB recommended converting These vehicles illegally blocked the moving the large triangular raised island into a traffic and presented unsafe conditions for roundabout which will force traffic on students and other vehicles. Crash history Chase Avenue to reduce its speed and also confirmed a significant number of improve the operation on W 34th Street by accidents on Dade Boulevard for stopped eliminating the two back-to-back stops and vehicles. HNTB generated two options to improve pedestrian safety at designated create a safe drop-off/pick-up area for crossings. See Figure 1. these vehicles as shown in Figure 2. Figure 1 Figure 2 Chase Avenue at W 34th Street Miami Beach Senior High School Traffic Circulation Improvement Plan t.44kk., ----(-- , 7.4 ''' % ..'-: ;'' . timp'- 00( ''''' *..4 4. ill° � .i,,Existing �, o ' 7 "let—., Existing W. __,z. Illikiiiii4 --• ‘,,,,,f - r ...- .,.. ----,-,--- ', , 1 I wY` ` / L �, AAA, , .t ' >< x a „ill 4 . , : ,,,, , 4,,, ,,,,..-/ ,, , Iti w k s. ,�� rte._ It [ntrze iit* r i3. ti. f f.r ,vie,, A MIAMI BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ' Proposed MINTS �.. ) p TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN AT DADE BLVD. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND 65 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA LEVEL OF SERVICE & MEASURES OF review all information resulting from the analysis, PERFORMANCE both input and output, to ensure traffic studies It is expected that traffic impact studies address correctly apply the appropriate parameters. the level of service (LOS) analysis before and after the proposed development and report other Ytve Guerrera will lead our microsimulation measures of effectiveness (MOE's) to properly group with 20 years of experience in reviewing evaluate the current and expected performance microsimulation models for many projects of recommended improvement strategies. The including for Miami Dade Expressway Authority service level analysis should follow acceptable (MDX) at signalized intersections and standards, including procedures specified in interchanges. the Highway Capacity Manual which also could TRANSPORTATION DEMAND include signal timing and phasing optimization to MANAGEMENT provide for optimal signal operation within the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) existing constraints. strategies integrated into transportation planning As a collective, our team understands the are crucial to the delivery of a sustainable underlying principles and methodologies used urban transportation system. This also applies in traffic models to generate results and believe to the daily management and operation of selecting the correct simulation and analysis tool transportation services and infrastructure. for the job is critical. We also fully understand the Some of the key TDM strategies for Miami Beach strengths and limitations of these tools, as well include expanding the supply and availability of as how and when to appropriately utilize them. more sustainable transportation alternatives, reducing the demand for unsustainable modes TRAFFIC MICROSIMULATION like the automobile, providing incentives for It is expected that traffic impact studies will undertaking sustainable travel habits while utilize available microsimulation tools such as imposing a higher cost on the use of the Synchro, Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and automobile such as higher parking fees. others less common, such as VISSIM. Our team continues to perform development and The microsimulation tools generally provide planning/traffic study reviews with a keen eye more accurate analysis for levels of service laser-focused on identifying project-specific TDM and other measures of effectiveness, especially strategies. One of these TDM strategies includes under heavy traffic demands approaching or pedestrian-oriented design elements, such as even exceeding capacity of corridors and/or wide sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and street intersections. trees. Another strategy is providing bicycle- friendly facilities, including secure bike storage Our team has used microsimulation analysis and showers, as well as bike lanes and multi-use tools for many years on a consistent basis and trails. Based on the traffic studies examined, we fully understands the impact of potentially will recommend TDM strategies to the City if the changing any default parameter in the tool on traffic study reviewed does not. the results of the analysis. It is important to know how and when to modify certain default QUEUING AND PARKING ANALYSIS parameters to better represent existing and/ A proper queuing analysis is very important or future conditions. However, clearly making to ensure developments do not cause traffic inappropriate changes to default parameters backups and negative impacts to adjacent could potentially change the outcome of the corridors and intersections. Estimating queue LOS's and MOE's significantly. Our team will lengths generally begins at the trip generation 66 GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFQ 2019-109-ND DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA step for peak hours. Engineering judgment should always be applied in special situations where the Trip Generation Manual does not provide appropriate rates. Also conducting trip generation studies at one or more similar land use facilities or facilities could certainly help generate more applicable rates. The number of parking spaces required should be provided by the development or show alternative accommodation for parking. Also, if mechanical parking is used, the processing rate and processing time for each vehicle must be taken into consideration as vehicles arrive and have to wait to be processed the resulting queue must be accommodated within the development and not spill onto the roadway network. Similarly, it is critical that traffic impact studies properly estimate development's parking demand and ensure that the proposed development accounts for it, either on-site or off-site or a combination. It is expected that the latest edition of the ITE's Parking Generation Manual (PGM) is utilized to estimate parking demand, however, not all land use types provide adequate parking rates. Where the ITE PGM does not provide a suitable rate, other similar developments should be reviewed to generate a reasonable parking rate along with a healthy dose of engineering judgment. An entry gate queuing analysis is expected for any parking facility with an entry gate for both AM and PM peak periods. The analysis is expected to examine the 95th percentile queues at the entry gate. The analysis could be conducted based on the ITE Transportation and Land Development Report. We recently, reviewed a traffic study for a proposed private school in the City of Miami that had no buses and did not allow children to walk or bicycle into or out of school for safety reasons. The traffic study used the ITE TGM's rate for public schools which was based on studies of several public schools that had many students use buses as well as walk and bicycle to and from school. The traffic study then designed the school and the students drop-off/pick-up area to only meet the low rate. If the school was constructed as designed, queuing vehicles would not only spill out into the two-lane, two-way adjacent streets but would have caused these streets to be blocked completely for the duration of drop-off and pick-up every day. We know from experience that private schools generate significantly higher vehicular trips and asked the reviewer to study similar public schools in the area and then apply these rates instead of using the ITE rates. MANEUVERABILITY ANALYSIS Internal circulation and access point maneuverability analysis is typically expected to ensure the development's proposed access points, as well as the internal circulation design, is adequate for safe and efficient traffic circulation. Vehicular conflict points and ease of maneuverability will be examined for all types of vehicles expected, including passenger vehicles and garbage trucks, as well as any larger vehicles, such as delivery trucks. The City of Miami Beach expects traffic studies for the developments to perform such analysis correctly. DOCUMENTATION Once data is collected and an analysis is conducted, the results of the analysis are expected to be clearly documented and summarized in a concise report. The report is expected to include supporting documentation, including but not limited to text, tables, charts and graphs, along with site plans and other graphics, as necessary. In summary, the HNTB team will work with the City of Miami Beach's staff and the developer's consultant, where applicable, to define the methodology prior to the initiation of the traffic study. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 67 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1C1-B82862A08CDA The project team will then review the study and cover all the issues mentioned above to ensure that every aspect of the proposed development was properly analyzed and that needed mitigation measures were developed, evaluated and recommended. Our team will not only identify the deficiencies in the study, but also propose potential solutions and demand management strategies to assist the developer and Miami Beach to mitigate negative impacts and improve safety and operation of the transportation system. WHY HNTB HNTB understands that Miami Beach is a key epicenter for travelers and residents in the entire South Florida region. As one of the fastest- growing cities in the region, we understand the challenges that Miami Beach faces to maintain its economic competitiveness while continuing to offer a high quality of life. Key to the City's economic vitality and quality of life is a robust multimodal transportation system that provides mobility for existing and future residents and visitors alike. HNTB understands how to perform traffic and transportation analyses in support of such efforts. Thorough and accurate traffic and transportation studies form the backbone of effective project development and implementation. HNTB is well versed in the transportation issues and concerns that are foremost in the City's mind and we can provide the City with a wealth of local and national talent and experience. We stand ready to help the City develop innovative traffic solutions and provide solid traffic and transportation technical support through this on-call assignment. GENERAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES I RFO 2019-109-ND 68 DocuSign Envelope ID:4F5B2607-34AA-4FD5-B1 C1-B82862A08CDA HNTB CORPORATION 161 N.W. 6TH STREET SUITE 1000 MIAMI, FL 33136