The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution 2021-31744 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-31744 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAY 24, 2021 CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP ON BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH. WHEREAS, in April 2016, the City Commission adopted the Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP) and Street Design Guide as part of the adoption of the Transportation Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the BPMP is based on a 20-year implementation horizon and categorizes projects into three priority levels; and WHEREAS, since 2016, the Transportation and Mobility Department has focused on advancing 38 Priority 1 BPMP projects intended to close gaps in the current bicycle network and improve safety and comfort of existing facilities within five years of plan adoption (2016 —2021); and WHEREAS, 88%of BPMP Priority 1 projects are either completed or in the design or construction phase, and the City continues to advance the implementation of BPMP projects and deploy quick-build/interim projects to improve bicycle safety and comfort in short-order; and WHEREAS, at the February 19, 2021 Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee (FERC) meeting, the Administration provided an update on the BPMP projects and a preliminary review of the Cambridge, Massachusetts Cycling Safety Ordinance adopted in 2019 and an ordinance amendment adopted in 2020; and WHEREAS, at the meeting, the FERC Committee recommended that the Administration research leading international cities on the forefront of cycling, including Copenhagen, Amsterdam, and Stockholm, as case studies to identify best practices and opportunities to model the City's policy and implementation strategies; and additionally, conduct a thorough review of the Cambridge Cycling Safety Ordinance, and conduct a City Commission workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety; and WHEREAS, at the April 21, 2021 City Commission meeting, the Mayor and City Commission accepted the recommendation of the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee, directing the Administration to conduct a Commission workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety to be scheduled on May 24, 2021; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2021, the City Commission hosted a workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety wherein both the BPMP and the Cambridge Cycling Safety Ordinance were discussed in detail, including identifying challenges and opportunities related to adopting a similar ordinance in Miami Beach; and WHEREAS, at the City Commission Workshop on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety held on May 24, 2021, the Administration presented insight on the challenges and opportunities associated with advancing bicycle-pedestrian projects in Miami Beach as well as innovative mobility policies and implementation strategies employed by leading international and national cities and their applicability to Miami Beach; and WHEREAS, at the City Commission Workshop, the City Commission recommended that the Administration take the following action: • decouple short-term bicycle-pedestrian projects from long-term neighborhood improvement projects and provide the economic impact of decoupling projects to address safety issues; • refer an item to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee to discuss bicycle-pedestrian projects that could be de-coupled and the reasons set forth; and • collect data, including crash data, to track progress on mode-shift and measure effectiveness of bicycle-pedestrian projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendations of the May 24, 2021 City Commission Workshop on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety in the City of Miami Beach. PASSED and ADOPTED this 23rd day June, 2021. ATTEST: Dan Gelber, Mayor (40/2.62-sti _,4/ Rafael E. r nado, City Clerk \INCORIVATED..` �R••.� ...:tib= 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION City Attorney = Date Resolutions-C7 U MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Alina T. Hudak, City Manager DATE: June 23, 2021 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAY 24, 2021 CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP ON BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH. RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution accepting the recommendations of the May 24, 2021 City Commission Workshop on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety in the City of Miami Beach. BACKGROUND/HISTORY At the February 19, 2021 Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee meeting, at the request of Commissioner Ricky Arriola, the Administration provided an update on the Bicycle- Pedestrian Master Plan projects and a preliminary review of the Cambridge, Massachusetts Cycling Safety Ordinance. At the meeting, the Committee recommended that the Administration research leading international cities on the forefront of cycling, including Copenhagen, Amsterdam, and Stockholm, as case studies to identify best practices and opportunities to model policy and implementation strategies. Furthermore, the Committee recommended that the Administration conduct a Commission workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety wherein both the Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan and the Cambridge Cycling Safety Ordinance could be discussed in greater detail, including identifying challenges and opportunities related to potentially adopting a similar ordinance in Miami Beach. At the April 29, 2021 City Commission meeting, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 2021-21675 accepting the recommendation of the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee to conduct a Commission workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety on May 24, 2021. On May 24,2021,the City Commission hosted a workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety. At the workshop, City staff presented a PowerPoint (attached). The presentation included a background on the City's adopted 2015 Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP), Transportation Master Plan, and Street Design Guidelines; a status update on the implementation of master plan projects; case studies of various international and national cities on the forefront of bicycle mobility and key takeaways on innovative policies and implementation Page 460 of 1884 strategies; and challenges and opportunities in Miami Beach, including advancing quick-build bicycle-pedestrian projects in advance of long-term neighborhood improvement projects. After discussion, the City Commission recommended that the Administration take the following actions: • Decouple short-term bicycle-pedestrian projects from long-term neighborhood improvement projects and provide the economic impact of decoupling projects to address safety issues. • Refer an item to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee to discuss bicycle- pedestrian projects that could be decoupled and the reasons set forth. • Collect data, including crash data, to track progress on mode-shift and measure effectiveness of bicycle-pedestrian projects. SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA Based on the 2019 Resident Survey, 73% of residents are concerned or dissatisfied with pedestrian safety (vehicle yielding to pedestrians) when crossing the street at an intersection. Based on the same survey, while 64%of residents feel somewhat safe when riding their bicycle in the City, 37% of residents feel unsafe. 47% of residents responded that at least one person in their household regularly rides a bike. 33% of residents consider bicycling the most viable alternative to using cars for trips within Miami Beach. CONCLUSION The Administration is aggressively looking for ways to advance the implementation of master plan projects, including deploying quick-build/temporary projects to improve bicycle safety and comfort and close gaps in the bicycle network in short order. At the City Commission workshop on bicycle and pedestrian safety on May 24, 2021, the Administration presented insight on the challenges and opportunities associated with advancing bicycle-pedestrian projects in Miami Beach as well as innovative mobility policies and implementation strategies employed by leading international and national cities and their applicability to Miami Beach. The Commission's recommendation to decouple short-term bicycle-pedestrian master plan projects from long-term neighborhood improvement projects, if feasible and pending further review and discussion by the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee and the City Commission, will allow the Administration an opportunity to move forward with planned projects, close gaps in the network, improve safety, and ultimately build-out the proposed bicycle-pedestrian network in a more expeditious manner. Applicable Area Citywide Is this a"Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O. to Know" item.pursuant to Bond Funds? City Code Section 2-14? No No Strategic Connection Mobility- Improve the walking and biking experience. Page 461 of 1884 Legislative Tracking Transportation and Mobility Sponsor Commissioner Ricky Arriola ATTACHMENTS: Description Presentation for the May 24, 2021 Commission Workshop on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety in Miami Beach Page 462 of 1884 .4 ( _ 4 k i nt t i. S k a; i ce. ty�q� i � � x 4 -t:'7;-,''' ,1,3 'Et 3._Y _ �I l�a 1,1-,-4.4' , „,-.'74:,-..=,- ¢ .,r y t _ _. y -� Tit, ,.. tr. ...•'44.):r.::-r_ `# e -• • 6. ��4 ; ate _€ - ,: • 'l S r i- ! • � ,t _ uc -c.,".s..,,,,.,.'- : ...', -4,?:•nt 7 • -;,--..-.4.--- I:, --,v,:r,,, ,,-, r , ..wR,..,,,.-4- --:•.,.m.L.:E..,.,,,,,-. t= ..,..- ----C-4-tv--'Jr'-='?-' -= •;t--4 irk---z,,E,..-f: i iss,... ...,, , 7- .. .).., • ....le- _....... IIMIllimi-..g, _ _ = •• Wit. F a3 id' s-`. �. ��3-4. iii ;: - - t {l ---'117.'..; 14:'• - � _ '' I ,. Ali � _ - 1 j �• Yly -1 g iw. „. .7I ti ..,..,,,,..„,,,i_ _ i - ; r; . - #tet 1 •' ice -. I ¢:4N, ,+\ •tet ( f 3 s v • -.71,-..11._-:11,tAa'�. V” Y i 1. tZ `,�.A. 3 x tJ. - s�` t t ri ix. r '--7+F !'� - t r �..� :e f* ' -mow f; .-A-,..:,:,:,, t E.t . . -t-,,,,.,,;:.::.,-F.•171.7:14.1-4.,ii$:-$7'..-.'..:,4,1,t,i''' ... • ..,77::, i. ' 8 . Meeting Agenda • Introduction and Purpose of Workshop ; • Bicycle-Pedestrian MasterZ:!: : r ▪ urnt tus of Bicycle- Plan Implementation ::r 4 • Assessment of Leading International and t, National Cities �;. ....,3 • City of Cambridge, MA Cycling Safety Ordinance Y c • Potential Quick-Build Pilots • Challenges and Opportunities in Miami p Beach .-- • Discussion . „ Page 464 of 1884 A Purpose ofWorkshop CITY 01 MIAMI BtAC11 P P BICYCIt P1)5STRI411 MASTtR PTAH • Provide background and status of the -_ Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan x I projects _ • Present progressive policy and implementation strategies from other cities 4I 7,- • Discuss City of Cambridge, MA I Cycling Safety Ordinance and - 4 f appropriate approach for Miami Beach - �.g g- • Present current challenges and discuss x� opportunities to implement bicycle- pedestrian projects quicker ® Page 465 of 1884 3 CITY Of 1114111 B[ C11 Intended Outcomes SRI . II1 S tR PLA BICY It PtK T A T • Obtain your input and _-: ::= : 1 recommendations on: __ I r o Strategic approach to master plan project - I implementation (short and long-term) _ ' o Pursuing an ordinance that ties ._ implementation of bicycle/pedestrian j roects to the City's Neighborhood , , rs. Improvement/Resilience Program _-,,.., -.-....... — - - ,',Pr o Resources needed to expedite master plan project development and -' implementation ? o Progressive ideas for the master plan update [ 48 • Pape 466 of 1884 4 2019 Community Survey Results City of Miami Beach 2019 Resident Survey • 37% of residents feel unsafe riding bike in the City • 25% of residents walk or bike as their primary mode of transportation • 33% of residents consider biking as the most viable alternative to driving • 53% of households have someone Findings Report- regularly riding a bicycle Weighted Results • 74% of residents feel unsafe when crossing the street at an intersection Submitted to the City of Miami Beach,Florida �e 725 W Freatier lam *ti� �. ETC Olathe,Kamm 66051 INSTITUTE Page 467 of 1884 May 2019 • • - ,,t,\,',. -. ..,.f'.,., -..,.. • • t% rf-,1-,611-.-.7-------. '..,- - .;.:;0!?,,,V . . ' ..,...:,-,•'- 0 .,,,,,,, ,. ..: .,........,... •.. ,.. .... . . . • ma"A494°Bed n••-(.';'‘.' :.' •.:'• ..MH-•.''.••' ,,:. •' •, ,,,f-1:17--. 9 I r.._-• ..-.:-v,....14 -- ------,,-.4 • ". , , '..-1. - ,.iiWy-.--_ -_-,- WS , --::.4'. 3 ::: •-•"." 41,1:.:.",,. .•' •.'•' C,-1 -,,1 • r',---'-':',t .: ., : '."''..... .. ,. .,.....- ,..4 0 .„ ,''' ••• f.. 7, .-:-; .4 pg -:..,1*._Q: ....:. - ...:.,:::ow,),..;.!::-..- .-., .•:;,! .5-=-4----.-7 1 .v.1 :.-A, k-A- ,Y,1--,'s.r, •_:..,:-',- ,,,:'',f•••• • •'-' 7-7-----, ItA'=_ .' ,I-t,-.-4-,:-,-A,-.:4_,,_,-, 15.,1 n, f--,1...',-4, . • • ..::',.I ,;.?r,.::.... • " -itSVFX-14..;---‘ --=--: - W '7,7.7,T,&' • ..''''';,,.W::. 0. .-, ,- „.:Ki.:1 -3.,p„ -.,-_, 4 m., ••;•:re; ......,.•,„;.,• ;. .•__.:4.,- , ---444-FT4 •:.• , -,44-41`,1, .';''W''. ---,----:•'• ..,..:-..,-,.,,...- .,./..,.,•2„.. • ...•••,.•••••, 63 N 't,.-R.,--4-1 -- . w. :t515,,,.:,::•.. -: ....t:.,...:-,,.. .-fk--41--; .. ., S-A .,:..i,f.::1 .•:-:.i: .w.-1,`.. .'' ,..! ;' -'",•.."1";'.:.4: ---,a,*,,,,...,t, ,, 1,-;,,, ,,..5:w4fizsziki.54 A.—.-= :, ,.;,:4.47-1.,AS':.±?,4 .5.. '''.. • ..!. .''',''.::':' t'dr'- : ;•-'1...::-•-•.,.0-, Al: -'-'--:- .V...,1 ..,t_..-7,, .":7_,‘ •::,7.:.:.4-.: ;::::... ... . ..,..,. . .. , -. . ,.:::r-:i ...,-'''' =.';';12 ;:1::',;i ..:•:.:;;. ..:.;... :*'- ..,. .„.•,-. . 7 - -,., -,!!.•Fs 4111! '-.,-..:,';'' ''''' . :•.-tie,-7-- ..- .:. i.:,?„;j,.,,,y ar.. . :_. ..-..„.==-3- _ '• -.,', 7:.- - -- IL-5,&,,,4_:',4i, .• m,-, ,, ::. , ,. s 0;4 ' * ''''' : e.... .. 47,15, , 4..--. •-,.----r- r',,f+-r,- , - . , 1...'SM-. ,,_ .--V1,1, '-'-',,,-+I., .-_-,' 1..,.. ,:';': - •; . ._-, .. . .. ., . -._ - -4•Qr7;e4.-,.' 4..*.;Te;;L-4-4, ,--- -7,- -T•---,-:,•____,--...-. ,i,-..,:::.,...,..,.. . . . "fw•-217.--- • -- --,-,•- ,,,..t„,„.,.,.,;,..,,.:•••.,.,.....,. • ...,;-.-.1'•,..„:. /4...,:.,:y.auk. ., ..044 i. .::.:-:,ii.,,,•'..;.'.•••'.: 1-3''',m,___,:- ,-.-•-•?-',iiii:-Ii-if*---;,---1„1.7":3;%,_,,''t14'1.' 76t.': '•E-'1'''4',--;;3-7,2-=' ,,:-„, S : .r:' *trit J a! "i.-',E:c.;:'.,:',1.:.,;::::::•:- 144.10.,'- 1,-;$,A.'t•gi-,1 --- • ---v---- ..,------ -,----: faz*--,N,,,, ±- - #.: _,--. .,:- t'.. - :- ..: ,,,... ;E:ki4 ::::..... 2 .„,„:.„..,:. :...... „.„.„„f.„..c.,..._. .„.„.„. : .... „.. 4...4Pil ----- F:'''-'1-44 :- .:'-'t4t-1-',-.-.14-Z---tillPt44.'i,: it---V.:: ::' ::'-::-';g:''..:• •.• -';',..,.'•,••:......: - ,,‘-,-,,t• ::.. : - ...-....,.:...7..... ':'.7:::::... • U,_ .--4!;;t"7'4a`et*4,1%*:-, --1_,L1 • ,,-t,,.,"Z;=•;-4-"'''''-: PSE.*:11,-Er.,",:.°.., -...•- .•,- 7,-1 11 ::, _____,,,,,,. , _,..-,,,,,, ,,. , fr7.---77:,'Z'',77,--- S4-:.-:.Viil'-,r-1A1f-Pa•• 4,3Si, - - .—' • ,1,4-1.:'-=:',,---------:-".'-'"'. .___.- ..,,,Koo•-- . -_--- ..,—•:‘ ,.---1re1_,,,..--, ,-, --,,;;..,•7.,-L• --T,.,.-a•-.Am.*,-,-,.,-,•',--."~„.,2-414. .: ,-.!,,;7-;"-- -.;-.-,:•-;..;---.. .--?.•=.*7-2 ,WA'`.417-2-2, ' .14'1,41.,A,-----:T-r---'..A.:=7:- :'..- ,i-----,---',- --,4,''.;.':!' "-. 1.---,4,1-"i,-":7-V:?ftt. -.,-------=--- i--• - 4 -:"... •---1"-•-•' -,,: -.••'- .t.,,Aleit*Xe. -__"------T*,ne-;, _,--- -.-...i4,-- •-•k_,•,•,„ „X,,,-. 7:177• • a.;--7-4,--,. :-.4,-; :43_,- • • -..--.-rhie :-,, , ,:-A- • .--A''''. ' 4-4? • •••- -.... ,,.„..,.... ...,..„, %.••••: .•• , . ... --; -; ..,.-. ,..., Overall Transportation _ (�1r Of MIAMI BtA(� P _ ABK7(tt P{ [5IRIAn mASitR P14 1 F t • • • 0 F %J Context k. I • 3 concurrent planningefforts: 1 fi ° { i - Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan , j , k ... • ' - Street Design Guidelines 3 t �. r1 -Transportation Master Plan ::� • Goal — Make it easy and safe for people to walk, bike, and take -- -- Strong and Fearless 1% "177 transit ; '' g_ —— — . Enthused and Confident-6% • Expand use of protected bicycle _ - facilities and dedicated transit lanes ' .._ �t `F Inleresjad,But Coricernod-60Y :, • Shift away from car use as the 4'y` dominant mode for residents and i Nolnterest-33°Gc visitors — modal p,i9ratIm e °,�s,.,m. b. Why Is This Important? Per the 2012 American 14% AAA A Community Surveys: 5% 02VbdibM9M9eVb • 30% of all residents and 10% ®®®®®®®®®® employees on Miami Beach 59% kk k k kkikk k k k are walking, biking or taking transit. • Including tourists, the number jumps to 45%. • South of Dade Blvd that 8% * A A A A A '^A A number jumps above 50%! Page 470 of 1884 8 Policy Through The Master Plan RESOLUTION NO. 2015-29083 • First in southern United States to adopt a A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY pedestrian first modal hierarchy OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE MODE HIERARCHY PRESENTED AT THE MARCH 18,2015 CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP ON TRANSPORTATION. • Increase walk/bike/transit mode-share WHEREAS,given the existing traffic congestion,the high number of special events,and the limited capacity in the City of Miami Beach's transportation network,residents and visitor from 30% to 55% in 15 years have experienced an increased level of difficulty moving though the City,and • Targets based on comparisons with other cities, street network, land use,and intersection density • l ft Individual projects will not in themselves .. � .. � � k•• ;.. drive the change, but together theywill R � a g NS Pt 2015 2025 SA m n n 2035 add up • Ratio of people space to car space is a measurable variable that drives change Page 471 of 1884 9 • • I WM ._ BPMP Background ��" "° ; y .4awb +Iw.ibr ! y- �.. w. I • Three tier strategy — ° �-�--�- o Closing the gaps — 5 Years ..c...v.„...,. ;l. ��.........G. JJi.�a.iryA % . .. °.r..ea*N,r�ah / ai.. : ..fwM Ca.,2 oKna. a., � o Short term (tactical) - I 0 Years 23 7 5%EL, a'. o Long term (aspirational) - 20 Years6 :4. - • Each tier tied to modal goals = J !' , ' P protected bike ��\® � • Focus on expanding 16 STREET PROTECTED LANE DADE BOULEVARD SHARED PATH lanes . .. : M: o Short term — modular separators/ N�` delineators/planters . _. . o Long term — grade separated Page 472 of 1884 10 Miami Beach Street Design Guidelines • Design standards for streets for k 1=tt ' people and not just cars I _ I 1 n+ a sii, r • Tool-kit be used by all MB .•• y2 1 _ I departments across all I m f rr projects/streets '1..•..: :_ .• o .1.,-,.. : _I, -E -io .4 • Guidelines for bike, pedestrian and L... .. open space projects • ' u' . Fig.2.18 Pedestrian Midhlock crossing. Fig.2.19 In pavement beacons Fig.2.20 Offset pedeseion midblock crossing. • Provided a complete streets frame- TYPICAL TREATMENTS a Automatic sensor laactivate MID.8LOCKCROSSINGS I Raised Median/Nose crosswalk(optional) work for the City 7 street Trees ° Cont cell panel orAC powered Midbkzk pedesh ion crossings shall be 3 Raised/Hi h Visibility Crosswalk to Control unit based on Nonage«cess and pedestrian e y it Embedded amber LED strobe lights movementTdesire lines. 4ge Audible/Dynamic Pedestrian signets (con be ton croseen sswalk00 of away] • include curls overhead,iion where Solo.RRFB pedestrian flashing i� Push button crosswalk«tivaar • Provide curb extension where o ] there is on street parking to en- beacon(optional] (optional) hoots pedestrian visibility. Pedestrian Priority Zones 7 Offset crosswlk forces pedestrians to • Provide raised crossings al high face oncoming traffic before crossing. traffic areas. Page 473 of 1884 II - - -:: "il':''•:- •:••:-•,:..-!•);:ifi;• •__, , . • -..7.7-:. :••••• ---••• .,, .„, ;,•-: •,;•:,•;• ,. -' :.•g.:4-if,',,.•;•••,,.. • :';••4 1,.t;P:a :••-. • " '•4, -;•:k'f!:.; ';'2!•'I''•• •., ; .••-;•; .:.g?',''.,:,,.'..', ,:.••••••••,.,-;-3;';;; --,.: ;-:T.•,• ••••:•";- :, ••.:- ', '-i?,'ji.:-:',7•••• ...-.'. ,,,--rz •`;}:): .;:-.'::.'... •.:'.. •• .-. i.: 'i.:.aN:i.1;,••f.::: f::_:'.. • ..,_',g, .1.R2,'g.::....'7'''-' '!-..(.1:1-;-1•0:.--.::%:;::.., -..., .,'''2.:'‘.f.li :,,.;. .: ...' '. .7"-:::'';,;:V.-'_ '•:.:.,:, !::-: .. '. .:.__:;:,,,r, .:„:•,.....:-- A 1-::*_:: ..,,,.,v. :•:, : :• . f,..k; ••-,,,:Z.>-:.:731,::.f-..,;.:.,.'- .,..,„,.-,, :fit:v;g:'t... :..*.- -f... :.'-:-:;'65;2:..,:;:':..::..--..•..:.,-;,::::.t .V,:...,i:::.:': . .,•.: :: :•.,'•'',•';§,:1:::-.:::• '''' .. -::.•..,! :'';';'4::',;. ;:. . ,..--.. :_ '4'Z'''"- %:''• •:-,.. -..• '; :•. :"!'.7.-'1.q,q'•::::.--- '''.. '7• ., ....:::,7•••••'.?if,,•3;',.•:: ': .:::-.: i.,.•:;';'::-:::3:8: •',": ,:,,,-::•.-• •'.••''!i' .,..'rV77,:','.:7•.:7.V• ,..'.::.'...':•::k;...-. 1:';'--..,*• •.•-:: •••:,,,,,','_.:- -%.---- .:.:,„:;',,:.,,,7i.:::.-:. . •. - ---, ,. • ' , ,._ ___, ...,,::._.„--._=,-,,x.„,:;-_,,77:-:,..p,..:*:,.- 4-0,,ztt.- .4.„-.7,4.,,::::,,,,_;-- ...— '.,-:_r_ __,..,,,,,....-7'' '.'''''',,,,-U>,11%.'r,,,-.'"ii.:Tgr .,0,. .-If-:::---.___,.. .24-47-,.:-_,:f:- .i.,:„."),:r--_:-•-;,_t•,-.&!,4„,_•,,,,tts-1,-,, 27----._,.,•••,..____,,,,,=.... •-0,,k4:40.7.:.;----,---cr.4 , 1.,,,., l•--—'•-..ir- -4:e"-----------14 -24, ---_--,;_:::2-.%,•A-_,- - -- :-.---- -..,---...*,-..-7-_,..-- .A.-.! _._ . -.,-;:_, ---:,,_,..,•: !.,„„ ;___,,e,w.r_-n--a•-770- 4_,_,.:,____._-_ - ---e-------'• - - '''-' ' •,-;:'! ..._•.,. • -...--R • . -,„:„ -., 4, ''--,-:-_----. . 2!-•;•-,-5+0 :. .,,,,,,wc- :-.-x -wf-rtg':';---'t -,.:,.,--_ -,,,,,,,,-4,,,;K:,-- .5, .-1 :„...•_• ••L....• --__ • • - ,- ,,,,•••••,.:1--1-,-.5443*A,zw•;:-k___w,:•!,:,•t_ •;,,, I1:.,_--- -142 '-:-;,i;. . .'..., i7kg?•'-' ''•••- . • .--k•w-:', :-,:t:i--: - ---,';-•!1',....' , -, ••••.,- ' :-."---- --ftf-g'-,M' -'5--=• -1ve• •F$44,7kiX.4-'4K-Ar:e.t.':.1,4 . • '•'-':•,' :•:•:.:V".'''''.., . • .:.;"•igj .. '.-•..,:,-- -,•••:•:'. ..'•••••-,•• .::::.,:• --,•--1;.±.- 'T.-,7--"k•:";:g---!••,,::_-'-----.-r.:-Z--"t0 ti-illf.ft -r '77-fl-- Ri.,'-`4 `,4i1.:n..-f0--- -L': -;-' .4 .s".:-f:Y.' • •••t•'','•::t •,-,;i4.: , ..:••::: ,,.,.:.:;•.,At-.:-.: ':.'':' ,-.7"--1 -7-. r. '7• ss.; ir-.4,-.1.---,-- --,-, w,1_,. cr!rakyrv,. ..f.,:--;._•-4_,,;-'--. *.• .- ,. ....: ..,; :,i ;:•-(,, .tisitot• . ?,,1 .t.„-__,,,k.- , 1 ii,-•-• - --, r-zttoft.,•,--,. • ,,,--4.:. t-pek r4 egi '''''' ' • S Ilia: - ------ _ 4,. ''!- - , - ------ -. • A- • • " .. . . .. . ''. .11 .1-7.`'-' . 4 -:*,_•77,__ ,..,",,_.7_,-1 „,:-.,..74,,:„X,--w- .?,.;. : rg.-!=:_:f._'.1i, e e - - - - - 14-1;;i gho ::... . ' w..411,,,5,,. -43-,;• -,-L-...---- K'g•-,-,.-, ,..• •' y •i•,';:,:-,• ••••••,•-,:., .-',-.i_lr.-v..7 ,.1,i; L---- -r40-,, ,,,,'„,,,----,-:---• p4-::-2 , ,,.;::,,.,: .- ..•.... :,:7... ",--:z :•':--:.":' ::: • ',:.;',.•-:.••. g • ' ‘..s:--ife::1:,--k---__S-,.-7-:,-..4--,Z-,,--.,r.44,IT• •..•'.•,'.:-.•'.",..'-;:-:.:::•.1!"',.!:,:.:.',. l-- .-:• :- T u.,;'..•:,..'.-,,.;r r,• .. en•,:.-. • :•..-•:•1•-•4:•:-• - .-- ,-'-, . ZI-'7o., .-4-,:'-':-71. -1-' ozrv,'-'''• !:-"4-4.7.1- -. -'-..2 --....;::- -.--'•-. '-, r,t,it i v 4.,.,, v4 4:-,1,;U:,•:.-5. e'-. • l'_ 4-...g--- n c:7i p'ihr&).,:•-4•:4r.-1-Z•-;37--,,ak7'e'gti,-i*417',---,.-I-,k-,--Lt--zra':,'- ,,:•--'•-..--:.'.,-..:,•:-:.•-:':-.:';-'::,,7'•4•'1:.:•.'.: ': .::'.:-•• ..N,•.a'••-.X•.:!';‘':',,':.:;';-f: ,,.:.-':c;:,•i;.,,c':.•:i:"::.'-...,•.•.•;-.; .!: ::, ,-;..;...:7,:,... .•-,.,.y.,. -.44z,,..,,F..7,7---,-,:-•f,,--": ;4'0..'. '.4-.:,.',X-1,-,--'--4P*/ - mw .4A „ : .. •••:-..--"':: 4:'.ir7 i V?,',',0-:i%;!.•.„_.1,5 4•1-11- 0 '„,-:'-:-,47, :V : i:_.'L, -•-c '; :''- . • •''' :':. -.''''', -:'-'''::, t-„:,-;'''', . '''''':,... .a•;•:,,;.+:::,;;•:• 14— -,- -,--r.,litill • --,-.--,- •.Y ,—-- •• • -4 ,- . '--,-.4i-c.7-; ,‘..‘-re„. .,-,,„:1I. ••.r g-, 4 4174 :;',iTi:::'••:.'i.. ....... ,.•,..::.••:i: -.- ;;,iJ.'!,•;z",:;:•...: ti 44 fz:E.•-z__- -'•:,•-iti .ti-5;1 t .•,.• • • 3:E;KW27-'::•-••-•. • :: ...-:':--:4,- ,•••••-: `41. -g -'7- 11----,-1:' '-- M..' M_V,:, •:... • ••- .••.:•:.';i:::',,' • :••.*: rp,_.4 . --..-=-.:: ,..404 --,,...--ti: ;-•:- ,,•.: .1M-:!•:',. • • :.:;:!:V. ':-••:••'.• ri' • ' P-- --ii-N.::::' i'..04 0 . -- •7- ' _,-,,Z.r7;,, ':::::,3-(-:. • • --.. ::, .e.1.- '- &4-0 _,-- ,-, ,f--g-'::,,,-;:..'” ;4! ±--; .....:.;. - .,-,-:::.:?•,,,,-.? .. • ... .- - :•:-,q;:; „.... :q--_,-,.i•Fi- ;'2.,..'• . . . :....,:-..--:::: n,7 4 11-p .----- -%;.,.ti--c_ cV:- 7: : -1 ••-- ,..,.. •',,'•'.:••:W'2.':,. .-' • *:•'.'' '' ,.;:-:' .-:.: • •• :": ';• . , . -.-•. Tr-41M •:• T- r, '-'------- * . ,..,,... ; __ - ;..,..1,V, . ,---,• :•;• =7- 214_ An -• ''''' • BPMP — Project Implementation Process • Project development is divided _ )NN. into phases from Planning to F�t- no , .rt°;,�� Construction Planning Public Involvement Funding Allocation • Some projects can move directly into design while others require feasibility and :_ _ le — mo traffic studies prior to design ' '' N _ ,t , ; _ LE'd Construction Permitting Design Page 475 of 1884 13 BPMPProgress Since BPMP Progress Chart 20 16 Adoptions. _ • 46 bicycle projects (32.47 Miles) identified ' - ---.0: 4', in Phase I BPMP Project Bank and Priority -, I Transportation Master Plan t '~• • i :.$ • Project Status—as of May 202 I E, Complete • Quick-Build and Pilot Projects - 7.55 Miles -. - •Construction --.-.14--- �� Design • Green Bike Lanes— 11.25 Miles CitintilOte ,_ ■Noc Commenced 1 -1 • Completed Projects—6.73 Miles .y:' ` e Planning 7 s ■Not Feasible • Construction— 1.15 Miles L 2!: • Design— 10.88 Miles - • Planning—9.47 Miles `-''t:_ • Not Feasible—0.3 I Miles - o • • Not Commenced— 1.06 Miles 7 • 89% of Priority I projects are either completed or in development Page 476 of 1884 14 1 BPMP Project Funding : r Y YNR - -� Not E x Funded/Partial v _ Funding • 48% of Priority I projects are not funded y�g �- F ,- '� 48°r° or partially funded in the 5-year capital n plan t, P{>5.is BPMP • Many bicycle/pedestrian projects are F.} `f ,` Project programmed in the capital plan as _: f Funding separate above-ground enhancements :8 . .x _ tied to neighborhood improvement projects �� s� E `' -- • City has been able to leverage over $8 z e f Million in grant funding - . 5 • No funding allocated for pilot or short- �-_ term project implementation or maintenance Page 477 of 1884 15 BPMP Partial) Funded Projects 1'`�'`t!I '\/\"\! BEACH y � • Partially funded projects depend on neighborhood RISING improvement projects for implementation and cannot be implemented as stand-alone ABOVE • Strategy relies on economies of scale to reduce project cost and neighborhood impact • Key partially funded projects include: • North Bay Road Neighborhood Greenway—3.25 Miles '` • Meridian Avenue Shared Use Path—0.7 Miles • 51st Street Neighborhood Greenway—0.4 Miles • Tatum Waterway/Byron Avenue Protected Bike Lanes—0.8 Miles • I Oth Street Neighborhood Greenway—0.7 Miles • South Beach Pedestrian Priority Zones • Alton Road/South Pointe Drive Protected Bike Lanes—0.78 Miles • Dickens Avenue/Park View Island Shared-Path—0.4 Miles • Pine Tree Drive/LaGorce Drive Protected Bike Lanes—4.32 Miles • West Avenue Protected Bike Lanes— 1.3 Miles • 72nd Street/73rd Street Protected Bike Lanes—0.7 Miles • Royal Palm Neighborhood Cya840.75 Miles 16 • • Miami Beach — City of Firsts ,1 __..... -_ ��r . • 2015 — First City in the southeast U.S.to adopt ate. new modal hierarchy prioritizing pedestrians • 2015 and 2016 — First municipality in Miami-Dade County to paint existing bike lanes green • 2018 — First protected bike lane in Miami-Dade County (West Avenue) • 2020 - First lane repurposing project in Miami- Dade County (Meridian Avenue) I • 2021 — First bicycle box in Miami-Dade County (West Avenue/17 Street intersection) Temporary Pilot Projects t , • 2020 - First parking-protected bike lanes in Miami- Dade County (Washington Avenue) • 2020 - First slow streets pilot program (Flamingo Park neighborhood) Page 479 of 1884 17 ---72\ r Mr3:: jilk k ...,. 63rd Street—0.7 Miles _ s __ Key Gaps in the a , _ .. J J Network �o • Given its geographic = . ..t.,:'.1'-' - characteristics, Miami Beach :=�— 1 has critical gaps in its Pine Tree Drive/LaGorce - 1 m- f g P Drive—4.32 Miles ` 11111v-- I bicycle network • Addressing gaps requires =: "� ; '1/p, pyo i 1�►tr71 3 ade-offs --. .. .---� IC. • Not addressingthese gaps - ' - 'P � ._._. vic �® .s 14 / :.: will result in an incomplete • Dade Boulevard—0 3 Miles - ' p and unsafe network , a Eer y ., : ® 1 S2 ni, _ -w / Z ...Y imp. �` Page 480 of 1884 f s F ';',7----7.--� A .. . . . ,, . Assessment o Leadin • . _ • . -,. .,.... ....._., :.t...„.„_, 9 . •, -.'-'''' ., , =,..- 11'1,•-,-.-17:„--4. -1...- ..,:.,„_.... .,,,... --_. .==0.:.::: 1 ii W., —. 1,'" r-:,•_= - , -i, ---'• '' et--,:' , , .. .... , ._, .. . PV. • .-- - - ''- '- ''-'. - ' - ern a. ,_., ,,• 0 - 43 - ---. - zi _ 1 UP 11 .• 7.i-: _Iat,, ;igtft,. ,7r:- _..1.1,.__r:-.._ .,----11 -r; ra • V rei 1 i li - - ' '- -• . ' '-°'''•--. ' --- ---,• • • Ilt;.4.L. .L"r.:,- ' -,....7.i-:,1 L., ''.. '.-i-fic.-!. .. ••••" .'. -, • •.::rf::=1•7 ''' ',r f.' -11" • 4. 4 ',A ! •--,.: ,,•!4746.-.":4*..-7 Y __. --5.-4,-,ti;r:----f--v4n: . :..... 7. :• =4.- - •••-• ,---..=•'=-=4.,_=.-='-=1,' • '• i- " ',':' ',I r ..•.1,0 I!..P " h.0...).• •'-'- - f. -'=:`,-a•-:'.''-:;-.. r'--t%' ' ' '- --FPL;:i-,--, 1-:Tv: '',' :,- '.'" .-,V!--'.4'• '":•'"-:'Z'''''''----, .rr, 4.;,'' "' •;*-, ''. -H. .'. . '- i At -.- - ..; ..:'' :-.,! i•ii..41-1..., : 1 ,,t7W,T-1,":".,1',A.r. L„I''"'•-_-A.-•:,.t7-7-.17.-4, ..---=.-,,,,i0,'__ • ':''314.r,„ , . -.- 1 I 1 i'Al .11 .._. ' ., if 1 '•lb, . — ----7--_,. ' '-, c,-..-11,--:'7.-k-t,-. --!' '.-. .i..*t: 10. ' - A.3 •'i.:',_a ---:'=-•••• -:-=r:,1 •--',:. T 4. if 7.Y A -, fl-...t,,--''rri.f'tf.' ''-'1-•:,-;,.._.. _ ---'11- ,-- '.' ..l..,*:, -,,--'"-:-., •,..,-V- • ' 0_;„‘_,____ ,,:.„, i.: • k* , nt.- -.-.1, rs; it :=4,11,1-iI,„ _q4;._14,41-7i: ,r_flwsoik-Aiftii; ..." ,_:-- -- ,' ''W' :, Z-.,---.. ..-:,-.1, -- '; -- • • • „,--- ----.' ...,-z., , • --• --,41.10110E-7,--71‘riatkief :-_--- 0-....--- ..•• •-:•-•. . --".•:' --- N V*7.;_i. .;,,wz=1: -.-7--:i,' , - ' ..;.'"h''';'' : :.i..,V*.:7T if . ' . . - 'AMU I,. -AV' ---,_ ,:ta i ' . •i'-7-;:Tr- SP' -I , MR - -- ” , - - ...,, . "f 111k. . ,:„ . • .•7 •?=:r .r.•.- = r --•-• „t=4-.-_,. ' s •.'''''' . . ' ••.' ,,..:.- . , - ,==-:.-: . , _ t•-• ': ..: • '''''L. 1 . =_-_-_--..„••. - • • — . _ - —- =• ___,..... ,-- •• - - ' ..; , , .„ 4- \\ .. . ,e•_-„:'-t: /1-- r_.";:_'-.,..'1-4").-141,,._ '4,4IvV•:-,-i"y:-,,_T—:' - Q ,:.*:.:.-:- ...`1.-.,:..,„N-..'_„r.,,.,4•-r.„„.-jr,, '4.i,C -,-- •-,--,'4 . .i i k•--4••'• 2",,„,,:„'..;.•.,6-,M7.,:7:7,.,;_,'_:•::-):,•.._7...7-.,--,r--7,,-4,,----i•...i-_-.=0-:--,.,'.4,.-,-.-_-._.-V::,__—.i 1 .',...- . -. r...-.7i.. ;••.•,.,•,: •,.,..- ---.€----:-;----- . -I--'. -- • -i-- .':: ' -"--g'4 WY:---.,44 --rt:I.'-iaz!'stgi,,,.Y''',-. -_,-, . • . . — - .. . . ,-.,--e...;.,-;; ,.... ;;•::.:'-;-..,- :,-.-- ---. , "--7,4' ,,•'(--1;1:- .:•:--,. ..".. Ait I' ' "----''.,' -- .'- -."'fl---' • 19 —• -..,:V.:c:. .... •••':. • ,17.',,. h •.• .. .. :•,-,,. .....fii: ,._ 1:::,.---,,,,.i,-..,, .,•_:,..N4, „.,,. .0-47,-„,_-,,..--•-..-:•••E.::: ,--.••_.,-;: t„,7_,,, ...:._, 1.::_. .-.. ,z...-t,„1,-.: •• . • Assessment Details • City's consultant conducted in-depth assessments of Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Stockholm, and Santa Monica, California • Research concentrated on progressive policy, design innovation, leading edge projects, ._ v,-,fL} i , implementation approach, and ' education practices .. . - ' • Innovative practices were compared 1 ' t,! - - to Miami Beach current policies and strategies to develop a technical memo on lessons learned Page 482 of 1884 20 .try _ Engagement Strong advocacy and public engagement at the Continue to work with bike advocates and the forefront supported by political will community at-large to help set policy and implement the master plan Implementation Continue Pilot&Demonstration Project Utilize Pilot&Demonstration projects Implementation in advance of permanent/high-cost projects Case Study Align with resurfacing) stormwater/wastewater projects Allocate funding for bike infrastructure within utility and resilience projects Take-Aways Implement Solar powered bike facilities+Install bike counters&Implemented"Green Wave" Fund permanent bike counter program technology Program Foster TDM strategies Continue the City's TDM efforts Offer subsidized&complimentary bike Develop a bike plan for special events+Encourage amenities—parking maintenance,valet biking through free bike valet parking+ maintenance Policy Limit on-street parking+implement car free Reduce on-street parking and increase availability of off- zones street parking.Leverage private parking facilities. Page 483 of tssafmplement congestion pricing Explore congestion pricing or cordon tolls with state and county government • • 40.:.-- -',-i,„. , ..• '.:-.;:!... °.' ..,. . _..,...,... . •__-_- . . -- ,--.,-. -- • - ---- ,..... .. . `-• - 3 • .2 -, :_6411.14.3Z,7•'- ..' . -1-'--.:1;',:-.1. - '' • -'- /.. • . ,___,,• :•-•,,,,,.7'g s. •-•,,-1 c I 1 _ .,_ . - :. i4; _, r..._ • le, ..,a.,-.• . . :Y, /- ' : -40 it, . . ,.. .,.4. ,.. -' . . .. re ....... ... '-"i".j..;4-,,--.. t a -- - , . - . . . — . . , , •..-,--,. . -,,.- - •, .,_ . ... .. i - : •, _ . . .-.. -.. gm. Li 1 It, ... — 'j • i s 11 --- ' • z-r- , . N.-./to — ' - --..••;1,k--,,. .. - ....7,;: .-,, . .. , - 4-.7 - .i----:---.±.-:,-3--. ---7',,,'-' -:,.'--..,:::!`'i-r-,-.','....'•---. ' ,i-. - i , t.7.-_,' ..__ . . 4t,,.: • ,,,:., .....-:-.:;-....7±77--- - , ,.'-':'',',- - ',.". ___ . I , .. I, " ' • • ----.3,--_ -6.-.377 • ;-0,-4...-, - 4; .. --•• - --" it :_.- ..- ,-.-i• -_,..- -' -1161---113.1\-'"4,1 -..k• ..,--:-.? r ,4 t .-.-. ;-.`1.7) ...!'-,'-'1'iiz•':is•-••;%4W.:::-. . , . .. • , ..: : ., . -. _. .__ , . • xx,'143 ,__ , -. .,.-„i.-.4,,__- _, ,,; .,6t.,--• ..---:-.;-.1 t-4, . . ----.-.:,--:_,,, ,,.,_,..=.-- ;7.-4:-.-''' - - -5,.'''-1-•• -4.;.,--r4244f4,X-"U-. .....•:.• .. ..-, - , ;._ •.,),........,:•...,-• ' ,-..',..• _=. ; . • ...-,-•-„--.'4. -'2.I. '.It..--4,.--, , •`.-IV-ft.-4'-e,'3•fr'''--' :.,............ .."' . .-.. . • .''i' : % .--y,.• "V" .-....9-iv.,A..;LI,' . .,:•,a .--- ..,,. -., , .-... .--z...,.-,---4' Ti'- -, ..'' ,..1/Pr'"----.,'•V" ... ,:-":'•-•';• .; s- 'i,'••• I• . ..,k..4.-, • . .-‘7.- -,A,. ' ' '..•.;.''-:7W".t-l'- „s• tt-",-4. !II'.-I , --„ ' pap.s Cycli • c _...A ; .. _•.---r-g'`,,,"..-44 c.-'144'-,-;.--•; 1/4 •-,..i. . • . . . •._ -_,:•.•:„.„:„•-•__.,...._..... ......;„•,•:-..,,.... .-:....-.,,,,,s.„-.„ .4._ ' • _•_-;_,,••-.-„,•:„.„-_,..„ ..1....t... ,../..4 3:?-1,,---' -'-... .i..,t+,--;7'•.l";:. '1.-A.,1•';t'-':',0,-,A e-----,-- ---A .--4'.,•-•:.. atk--,,:ir .:,-:4,,,._--A7.f..?,:zt.s-Ail, • .. .. .„,.-. ...,,.. .z.„...„•_,--4,.., -..,., .-, . ) . . , -.. ,, . .-,"..-„---- . . -_,,,.„-- '-- ;-. -•---37•-•."*"-.----r;r• j jf-e--'--;-'," 2,a- '.=.65.-.---",--',4 ,,.. . . _. .. .-41.5-4irk,,,--1...--Rt.,--7-'7'...-2-: •.--12.,..7.14-,:i!--- -.. ---7-::.:°'---4-4-,.-%,...-t..!,.,.::; -;:;,.. - -. , . ,. . . • '14*--. -•;4`.- --`_.------.--,7-,--•-•At-1,•:;•-';!-:4..:•'-:--'--;r --'--,' -'' --:.-J-.-- • —.-.-‘-',1-.' ----.:L'A-;•,__.'s ,•-•..-4,1%-,-.4,-.N.E.4 .1-.••••...:,,,1-..W.4.,..,,.,f:,--,? • . ...--71'.,b•- -J-J--t':-..I--r44-•-..fic.,-R-?.--J-'-","---_":-_--.; -,-,4:-..-- _ `4-Je-/4 - . . .. ' " - -- • :-- ---4"--...;,•-Y"-e--',„..“,-',Z _-...,-t,%•*.-_-,V;e:-3.,-;-.2-...i7.,..'1',-.K-..-.Y'.-:_.:%4-..-4--,:,-/.-.•-•.-r,-•`_*-- • . .- ..-"Y-_-4-7...:-4, •-i.- .-`..--11,.1. .'-':- '.-.-'4. -sr----4..-A-V- .,--,-f'‘ -•- -' - -- 4.,--4,'4,- ---'-; -- -''''•,:zri.--.-TI,-:''-.:--“i-..:..`,t-',--,•-•:---....".•4'...f.-4,,-;',..-•;,:-...' .. , , .i,-..--;,•=,-,.---r4F.=--.-i,----1.,i---',,-,,'i'-V.-r.-,.-'f3-:#i-.,.,..'t.,i•,I.'-1r'4..-•i,4-1: "•.:..4:-.,.f--.'-.e:._:,:-':;'•--.••'•;...-:-e,.-"'-'1..7'_'.-...-.,....,..'...,,.-.'.'.',.',,,..;:..2Y..:,1'-1.:.-.0.Lf'.-i,':.....t:...'.,;'''-_,A.:•--.i.'''::.,'t'.,-•':'-.-:-..!:-,4":7:j::-;&.','.‘i.,-:!f.;.-,-'Z-%-t.!I'"'1..PA..'..1.7.'..--.=-.! '•:,..'; .'.,- ;_•...,;:g -,'7-3'.g---.4.74",,,,..-..-:: •_--.1_,. ,, .,...'-1..;_.. 74-,v,....„4.;...•, - •( ._. • ., - .- •',.;..,•';..''.-‘,..:.'-P7.,',,,'.. -1..,'S.,C..---::.- ...'.,.. - " '.•'., V-- : F4),-9'N'r.r..-:±.-".,t•..-.-''' .-:?'.‘F.7'...1--.''.'......'....''."....'-'-=;'"."',,,4'.'e.**,'-"‘ .- \7,17 k.;:..,-;..',..j.*-".:'.---","(;'...,-:: .... -:.-_,-2,'-'4.f!'•'.."-..--:..'...,'=.'-';':.-7.r.,-,-':±....-..-- ', . \\\... ,. ... '--.'-'''.7::-.'•-•••- •.--:...,'71'.....,*;'r-•'.-..:.:.r'-.......5.- 14."''-' -.. • . . . .. a . ---'"-. ' - • —-' - ' '.e' . . .- • 22 .. . .. . .. • . ••• -,... ,..--- , ----s.,- . . , ---: ____.• Page 484 of 1884 •,-:?' Cycling Safety .of. . Ordinance History , t;. _t. - . ti • . Origins , . hi,r ,• •2015 Bicycle Plan ` ' •2018 Sidewalk/Street Plan Impetus _a •Advocacy groups recognized slow progress in Bicycle Plan ,=6 „� ---Ni Original Ordinance - •Passed in 2019 �- •Ties protected bike lanes to Reconstruction Via Sidewalk/Street sv" . -' Plan , Ordinance AmendmentVision "'� •Install 25 mi of separated bike facilities in 6-8 years along specific corridors Ordinance Amendment Results •Quick Build vs.Permanent Construction =; `�� t h-,7-=';_- } ,.„off •Set Construction Schedule Page 485 of 1884 _:. men.. 23 Ordinance Highlights 2019 Ordinance • Mandates that any"Sidewalk and Street Reconstruction Plan" shall include improvements - to comply with the Cambridge Bicycle Plan and Pedestrian Plan • Established that compliance was not l - . Ott 1 required only if the City Manager can ��` . .- demonstrate that the project is impractical due to r "` �; " physical features or financial constraints F iiiLLL.. i �• 2020 Amendment q• ' ` , I • Sets specific deadlines for the implementation of - , ,_ protected bicycle facilities on certain corridors :- -. _=_}`tom.. • Introduces temporary projects when permanent projects are far in the future - = `y.-_' • Sets deadlines for implementation of temporary - projects • Assigns final decision authority on implementation timeline and possible extensions to the City Council Page 486 of 1884 24 Lessons Learned and Take-Aways • Strong political will ensure plan implementation __ • Codifying that every neighborhood - improvement or road-way corridor project includes bicycle-pedestrian master plan recommendations to ensure network build-out - • Mandating the Miami Beach Street Design -- = - Guideline is applied on every neighborhood - " improvement project at DCP stage to ensure cohesive inclusion of bicycle-pedestrian �' "' „- improvements - - =wiiiim -- ,Z • When possible, fund and separate "filling the gap" projects from major infrastructure ' 1111 Ammo projects which tend to be delayed • Fund and pursue the demonstration & pilot _ =,"'' `t'`- project model Page 487 of 1884 25 :mois , - - ., • }.. • • �. 'l` _ ^m .. r scow F ,� . 444 Galles =_ . - ,. {_ 1 :' lentos T �' • t2 . + k '1 ;.„-‘1,1—� tip .,. 'rra µms- _ �s -te - : - --7,-,-. --',--,-,,,,. ..-_-; .: .. .r , 'E ROAD_ �f '. - wry � : SHA _ _ ' L3Cu TRAFFIC 34- . ONLY '=�}- "`4; t ,.. - _ y`-. s _-- F .- ;#* 4 ,s, 3 -tip ry r - ,fit t0. t �0' . _' IzT y`f' j( 7 'x . 5 C4 [r$v , . Aa•„K `�.. mo " f c : Y irx- w _ How do we get there? Accelerating Project Delivery Demonstration Pilot Interim Design Permanent , - . .,_, ,...it , , I ---� _-' Nitob, '.__ -1-----.410111--‘---- 411111111111 • 'gill 7'! Up to I Month Up to I Year Up to 5Years 5+Years $ $$ $$$ $$$$ Material Durability ► Public Inputo. Investment .- Evaluation Page 489 of 1884 27 Demonstration and Pilot Temporary Pilot Washington Avenue Project Benefits a .v 9 it • Pilot and temporary projects help advance the BPMP network with low impact materials — v • Reduce cost while achieving ... . immediate safety and connectivity — - benefits Coral Gables Example ' . • Refine design and test design , I i I j treatments without great investment s • Achieve community acceptance prior �A_ ' to investing in permanent a construction - _ Page 490 of 1884 28 Tactical Urbanism - - - - -= = `, , • Temporary low-cost changes to the built environment to address transportation or social needs of the tii ! community E:, • Projects are typically implemented as part of community events ; Rue Vendome Plaza St ` • The City has already been - . Flamingo Neighborhood Slow Streets implementing tactical urbanism — Rue Vendome Plaza and Slow Streets _ - • There is no current procedure or T •a. 5 : rem: guide for Tactical Urbanism in Miami- { °rye Iv Dade Countyand these projects must f� I __. s a,- , _i b .- ,7 -'-tee r 7+ K' follow the same permitting process as - '" Y permanent projects ._sem. _°_ r` . .:,= Page 491 of 1884 29 4 ' g .y { Y i'r i. d1r- Pilot Funding • No funding approved in FY 2021 — -= t • FY 2022 budget enhancements requested for ` o Maintenance of existing pilots ($223,000) . _ i.44r... ■ Flamingo Park neighborhood slow ,a-,:„ 1 VF streets . • Washington Avenue bike lanes ^4 o Implementation of new pilots - u ($79,000) - ■ PennsylvaniaAvenue bike lanes �� = ` k • Bicycle parking islands = f Wi = zr., J Vgir t: . , Page 492 of 1884 30 __....-- . -&-- . ,,,- I rz: .•-_.._.- ,- _;... _--:.. ..,...„...k.„ _.....zi, Kim,lot ofiBd .,, , roi.b. , ,, - --_-. -TF,---.7! - - .,-,-..z. .:;1,7?-- -7-'-•-__,._ 'N'Ll, ,''•. --f i-,_-- ""' - .-%-. .' _ -,4101-;_,..------, 1,7 11 11 - — :`: ,,4---g f'' !::'i—2 c.-.7--;*;•14_ . ..,:„,,,,A..-5:-?,.%z AR- ___-_ __,_,„:-..„1.-- __ . . ...--'. . 4 -- := ,.--3,.. ,-. P,•_:_:..-- - i • f'.- .--.--: .c . .' _,,,_ _ , -:k .0„ '.'2'. ,• ,.. a:-,:' -= I . . = 1 "- -. ..., . , , ....I - " .." -- ; '.-, EW - ., . . . • a L , '1 6.: - - ___„ 5' ,------.,-77-,--5-,..‘---- 5. itisoiti " •,..-... '' t.:4-:- .---X7'c'''';'-,,,.• ,,. 'IA .,.....,,,,, ,,,,„,.:._• --T. ,, ---=---,_ 4-1-V_Cx: :.2.- ----- *.k': . . . .--- ., , ;‘ 4: ,-..--: V. 1". .'-'' = - - ---,-___„:„: 1 .42, airro---,..r, -. .,..4 :9- - • 1 -_47, -• -f-- .. - • -.IM.-i----•-... A ...-_--,•& • -'4= - . rerlige-'• ..----71v .-.1; __ -,, _ -- '''‘,. - -.7-r.___'-'_ OP 4- _ .... , •4,^-..f 7 • --, ,,,.., /\/ --,3,,,---f*: --. 1.„_-.. •A„ ,,..-—.."`4,-,,-1•-,--1.,yz N ..,--S%%,. ..._ , '..i,' ,"-:-Pe. .- ' % ...m.....--,- ..-.1". „.,.._ -- if , , -.-•-• --isi,........., -.---.....• --1:4„,, -%,,,,-.4-.„_ ' ,.-,-. .... * - - _,„..,,i,„_f_,_.-.__4,._ ft..,ii-e - •Ns..-,,,.?-)k,,,,..„,,,---...:1,-: -,V:-.•=;-: "*--,-1.71"A ' ' ‘ ..„..x.,_ „. . ,.. _ , , Tilt-a al - • - r . .4,;•.-Ate,i,:, .„-4.-.-t- _ - - 1 - A - 0 l' .i.„ . . ... ,,_, Alw* .., _-'-', ...- 7,-Ve, .' , -„, • •••-,. --7,I,-,2---=; --F elvti li. , = , .. .:....--.....c.i:: --„, -. , -.,-_,*--_- . , , _ .‘ r , . _ ... .4-i ....'.*-... ''-.Z"..' '-. --44i,W,-,- ) -. .. '--- '- 1--7 ••• : ... - - I- -.1-. i 1# 4 4.- „„.. a i .-7,1-- .',.' _4.... 'Ll 4t , ....,.. - _ --_,±.. ,,-.. ,. ,, _ ,,,:lf ,Lil..,t,-A:IV -4 0 0 C lc ar.117:44.° --"t7 I ',.. -,- - - - , . -4..„„i'4•1----:v--:'•-,1_:"""-.z•-•.- -, ,-- -,,..- - -, •-•,,w- - 1 l'_ . .-- ,,,---.--_,-,t - • - I'i 4, .0 • - _446.- • -,..:- t. , tibi%;___74.„- ,...... . .,---_,-.,,,-,-- 4- -, . ; I,. '' --.;,- .tI- se. t' 1.- -?:,..- . ,•- _. A _.k-s __ - -..... _,,-.. 1-`'L:CL:- ,-,. ' -1.1=`-144t.orte -7- ' .!,,. -.. "kl...m•ff ;-- -1;17A • ..‘•:. . ,..; ' - •• lir ',...- ..,-' --,-, ° - V 4 ,••,#:'' ' , ,i- - ' ...e-,---, •• , ...tkii, ; , • , f--• I. jo,..-,- •,,i., , , , .473..r.- . ...-,- ___ ,-_- • : , ---, sl , ,_ • _. - 4 - 7 j-_.;,i, .._ .. , —,. _ .._.: North Beach Pedestrian sj w :. �.' Improvements ,.�; Lae • Project is not included in the adopted z--== i.;..__ Master Plan ; ,�� i X11 I,� ri a • • Implement painted bulb-outs and planters at intersections within Biscayne - _► ri Beach neighborhood to reclaim - 4 pedestrian space at intersectionsA - A` • Monitor and experience safety benefits _ at low cost t' '' .. w • No significant challenges and no parking _ ,.- _: impacts expected wai, ,;. • Pilot cost - $75,000 � �` -' '7 �:� , r t 7_ ,- R , Page 494 of 1884 32 Pine Tree Drive/LaGorce Drive Protected Bike Lanes - Ai • Priority I in the BPMP • Purpose: create protected bike lanes to close *do; jjIj • ' this critical north-south gap in the network T : _ , J c �,v , _ „ .....• „a— 1 .'Q4be' r Me •-r-+'r t! .ra bY_ &UT, P 4s P. 54W. • Contributes to improving corridor safety by _ _ . introducing a bike lane through lane reduction "'` • " • - and reducing vehicular speeds i ., Y • Challenge: lane repurposing - Pine Tree Drive _ is a Principal Collector under County jurisdiction _ _ __ • Opportunity: initiate demonstration project ---` =' : -� _ ` to test bike lanes while City conducts a - _z u comprehensive feasibility analysis • Pilot Cost: IOO,OOVage 495of1884 33 South Beach Promenade • Project is not included in the adopted � � ; . ,, . ,,;, al � - _ twt Master Plan = Wit„ _ , ,, di • Create enhanced pedestrian ' ' ter. �` connection linking Lincoln Road, ; ___ 'y =; _ Espanola Way, and Ocean Drive ,i f • Project is undergoing a comprehensive f, . f5, -Air planning analysis ----' - ,--- 4,- i li---,,- „,,-, • Opportunity: tactical urbanism to f _ : E> advance implementation, measure - P : effectiveness, and achieve results at % _ f IOW cost _ _ _- • :44f: r .s • , .. • Challenge: relocation of on-street = parking on Drexel Avenue , • Pilot Cost: $ 150,OOGe496of1884 34 f 'r--74410q. 'e-T�3 0 7f�- E' �" »• - iN' .*l" �i liii IV vi ZS' MP III If • � � mar Hsik€tri'' •i, , r -. '•x �. \� 'Om t.1 - Hila i- { g t { ::•-'7,..,;,..-N-,,.,t. �NM� a' _ fyt Ti '�+ - 4 aT;j11 .-a.ree. ' j• -.� _ u - Ar \ �.a�'. 15.4 r o Y . t i ae1 - f,,„.}:. '.R W., ,erAVW �. 4 .0.'”' r'6, --,� `.4 ^�I ?'. 'Ix X5-, �:� std .. ! 5{{y • 3.fy • 1 p ISL /��_ • J4i -a,'I.- ,IS K f • 4,- = r 1 -J'14. -,.;/,'� ,....1. we,,..- iR Si'• 7.1_,%.„,%l ti-A. Zf}ice y.,a W 6 -i_ ,+: . ,ey- k " , 1"..:-• 3.rS .' ,�1" .a.•:,41.;:,,,,,,,./.,,- ,°'•?.• ..�•rter,.,...',..!. ..•aye ^}W ..'tom Y r.>-F y 4 Oki',rte 1 Ati s i ie . :j 1+ -,/+",. -'• e '' -,..,,,,,1:";'-- .44.. .'.. i ,;;n, a r r T ,-- J-.:'IA ,, cc ,,ti... ,fig q 7 _ ,6 i. J1 } �. 4-4.4%, �g „-1'--,�.a1 ., 5, ,- f fir,'` 4. `" -. s ', Ate. �,q - d,.;,,r,..„,..ii,. �.� ' -; `,0 , ro' �c.', "t s3,`. Current Challenges: Limited Right-of-Way and Competing Interests • Given our built-out environment and N limited right-of-way, many master plan projects depend on trade-offs to secure implementation =� = • Design trade-offs can include: o Narrowing travel lanes v o Repurposing travel lanes -'''` • o Impacts to on-street parking j = • Successful example of design trade-off o Meridian Avenue Protected Bike Lanes 1 North Beach Greenways (81 n Street) Proposed Parking Repurposing/Relocation Page 498 of 1884 36 Current Challenges: Status of Neighborhood Improvement Projects and Resilience Program • All case study cities had a strong tie between the neighborhood Flood Mitigation Results 18th Street and Bay Road reconstruction program and � _ -- bicycle/pedestrian plans ,,_ _ ri 1 • Miami Beach's Integrated Water 1,-' Management Plan does not have \ _* , =' specific years for implementation of " projects which affects el _ i t ' - - bicycle/pedestrian project - , - - - development . _ _ - • Street Design Guidelines best- •- /19 practices are not consistently BEFORE `` '�h"4`°'°'""' ' ` " `$hN"w'°'u incorporated in neighborhood improvementrojects due to feasibility,funding , or permitting Page 499 of 1884 37 Current Challenges: Jurisdiction Issues and Permitting • City must secure permits from County and/or FDOT for any modifications to streets including bicycle and pedestrian improvements • Extensive permitting process significantly delays projects . • No design guidelines or expedited permit process at County or FDOT for pilot/demonstration projects which makes quick-build projects not so quick to build Meridian Avenue Protected Bike Lanes Project Duration Project Phase 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days 60 Days Planning and Traffic Study -:` '�: Miami-Dade County Study Approval 240 Days Design _= _: .. ..... Miami-Dade Plans Approval I 300 Days.......... Construction tl ��' Total Project Duration -2 1/2 Years Page 500 of 1884 38 N ' Traffic Engineering/Operations and Current Challenges: Limited .�. Traffic Signals _ Department Resources , _y a h_ , • Adopted master plan includes 46 Priority 1;` r ' I projects totaling over $50 Million -- • Prior to COVID, Department had I I -_. FTEs with 3.5 FTEs assigned to master _ i_ plan implementation Transit Operations . .. • Due to COVID financial impact, 2 FTEs w -,� .w were eliminated this fiscal year � : ..--, • Currently, Department has total of 9 FTEs • Based on Department's current Program Budget, only 1.8 FTEs are responsible for - x �i the development of 40+ bicycle/ �- ` pedestrian projects - ps.-� , • Submitted an FY 2022 budget '` ' enhancement request to recover the 2 ` ., �) I 21 ' FTEs eliminated during COVID 1 -- _ + +.Z Page 501 of 1884 Bike/Ped Planning and Implementation 12 VP Topics for Discussion i • Strategic approach to funding and implementation of master plan projects (short and long-term) . • • Pursue a cycling safety ordinance to ensure accountability for timely 0 implementation of projects • Limited resources: staffing and funding INTAP needs • Master plan update focusing on short- term/quick-build projects and other progressive ideas • Collaborate with the County to develop 010 slob a process to expedite implementation of bicycle/pedestrian projects, including _ quick-build and pilots Page 502 of 1884 ±------7-Z-=',- A1' S 40