Zyscovich Draft Vision Plan Powerpoint Presentation to Panel 12-17-21DISTRICTMIAMIBEACH
ARTDECOCULTURAL
VISION
Miami Beach, FL | April 7, 2021
Landscape Improvements
MXE DISTRICT
Miami Beach, FL | April 7, 2021
Landscape Improvements
MXE DISTRICT
Miami Beach, FL | April 7, 2021
Landscape Improvements
MXE DISTRICTMiami Beach, FL | April 7, 2021
Landscape Improvements
MXE DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
MAYOR’S ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT PANEL MEETING
DECEMBER 17, 2021
2
Agenda
1. Responsive Management of Public Spaces – 15 mins Bernard Zyscovich; Jerome Barth
o What does it look like?
o How does the management entity act?
o What is the relationship to the public sector?
o What can it look like here?
2. Expand The Landscape and Create a Great Park and Public Spaces – 20 mins Bernard Zyscovich; Jungles
o Reimagining Lummus Park
o Schematic Program Diagram
o Lummus Park Concept Plan and Keys for Implementation
3. Create a Comprehensive Transit and Mobility Plan – 30 mins Bernard Zyscovich; Kittleson
o Overall District
o Ocean Drive – Park + Pedestrian Street
o Collins Avenue – Shared Transit Street
o Washington Avenue – District Access Transit Street
o 5th Street + Lincoln Road – Transit Plaza/ Transfer Station
o East/ West Connection – One Way Streets
o Alleyways
4. Zoning and Incentives – 20 mins Bernard Zyscovich; Paul Lambert
5. Q & A – 40 mins
6. Closing Remarks – 10 mins Bernard Zyscovich; CMB
3
THANK YOU...
4
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT1OF PUBLIC SPACES
5
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACESWHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE?
Bryant Park
BEFORE
City Management
AFTER
Conservancy
Direct Jobs 2 120
Annual Budget $250,000 $25,000,000
Percentage paid from
Taxpayer
100%0%
Visitors per Year 200,000 8 million
Serious Crimes per
Year
1,000 0Bryant Park
BEFORE –City Management AFTER –Conservancy
6
Town Square —Let’s Make Your Space Great
Clean &
Litter-Free
Safe, Orderly
Behavior
Multiple Activities &
Diverse Audiences Branding &
Placemaking
Individuals Who
Feel Ownership
Plants &
Horticulture
Well-Maintained
Infrastructure
7
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACESHOW DOES THE ENTITY ACT?
• Daily presence -Understand normal conditions and behaviors
• Respond to immediate conditions -Not tied to a business plan or schedule -Learn what needs to get done over time
• Hyper-local -Different tactics block to block -Can move between public and private boundary
• Communicative -Direct communication with stakeholders
CITY MANAGEMENT
1) Empty street trash cans Mon/Wed/Fri at 8am
CONSERVANCY
1) Empty street trash cans throughout every day, with additional staff during peak hours.
2) Observe trash along curb at 8am. Remove trash at 8am.
3) Observe graffiti on light pole at 8am. Remove graffiti before end of day.
Dynamic in its Problem Solving EXAMPLE: Tactics to ensure cleanliness
8
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACESWHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR?
Public sector manages relationships instead of services:
• Overall strategy and orientation• Alignment with city policies• Legitimacy in eyes of public• Capital financing and start-up costs• Board presence and long-term accountability• Search (audits…) and Rescue (if necessary)• Right balance of competencies transfer
Management entity applies private sector methods with public purpose:
• Ownership mindset: Discipline & flexible timing in execution• Multi-year budget and fund retention• Even levels of service – countercyclical• Control over staff & no legacy of labor negotiations• Market-based pricing, flexibility of staffing & best price-to-quality ratio procurement
• Hyper-local knowledge, bridging different worlds• Project controls & resource optimization• Ability to experiment• Clear responsibilities (metrics)• Public strategy & communication• Information exchange & optimization of processes
What are the key elements?
• Defined district boundaries• Private funding(value capture)• Diverse board composition• Approval and oversight by the City• Independent day to day managementand finances
Genesis Story
PPP
Genesis Story
9
Management entity conducts public-facing operations. Quick to respond. City focuses on large-scale operations.
EXAMPLE: Sanitation Roles EXAMPLE: Safety Roles
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACESWHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR?
Safety ambassadors monitor behavior, inform the public about expectations and provide first-grade interventions. Police step in when needed.
10
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACESWHAT CAN IT LOOK LIKE HERE?
Create and manage systems to respond to:
• Delivery logistics
• Guest and tourism experiences
• Programming and event management
• Park and street life programming
• Neighborhood signage and marketing
• Hotel bookings
11
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Feet
N
RESPONSIVE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SPACESWHAT CAN IT LOOK LIKE HERE?
12
EXPAND THE LANDSCAPE AND CREATE2A GREAT PARK AND PUBLIC SPACES
13
29.7TOTALACRES+/-
14.5Acres
15.0Acres
4 8 .8 % A R E A B E T W E E N D U
N
E
A
N
D
S
E
A
W
A
L
L
5
0
.
5
%
A
R
E
A
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
O
C
E
A
N
D
R
I
V
E
A
N
D
S
E
R
PENTINE WALL
NEXPAND THE LANDSCAPE AND CREATE A GREAT PARK AND PUBLIC SPACESREIMAGINING LUMMUS PARK
14
SCHEMATIC PROGRAM DIAGRAM
LEGEND
Beach Access
Beach Dune Lawn With Coconuts Major Circulation
Lawn With Coconuts Structures Ocean Drive
Event SpaceExisting Wall
Programmable SpaceBeachwalk
Beach Dune Existing Wall Beach Walk
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
Visitor Center Muscle Beach Ocean Drive
10
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
8t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
6t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
12
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
14
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
Proposed Playground Lawn w/ Coconuts Catwalk
Programmable
Space Major Circulation Volleyball Courts
Programmable
Space
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
Se
c
t
i
o
n
3
Se
c
t
i
o
n
4
N
LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS
15
1. Improve the City’s connection with the Park and the ocean.
2. Increase resiliency and enhance ecosystems.
3. Improve north to south connectivity.
4. Activate and refine park programming.
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
SE
A
O
A
T
S
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
EL. 13’-00”
EL. 9’-00”EL. 6’-00”
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
R
O
W
L
I
N
E
WE
S
T
E
R
N
M
O
S
T
E
D
G
E
OF
S
E
R
P
E
N
T
I
N
E
W
A
L
L
EA
S
T
E
R
N
M
O
S
T
E
D
G
E
OF
S
E
R
P
E
N
T
I
N
E
W
A
L
L
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
L
I
N
E
LUMMUS PARKOCEAN DRIVE MULTIPURPOSE AREA DUNES BEACH
Existing
SE
A
O
A
T
S
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
L
I
N
E
+28’
+/- 380’
LUMMUS PARK DUNES BEACH
OC
E
A
N
D
R
I
V
E
Proposed
LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTSLUMMUS PARK CONCEPT PLAN AND KEYS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
16
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
O
U
T
H
10
t
h
S
t
.
Ocean Drive Ocean DriveOcean Drive
14
t
h
S
t
.
5t
h
S
t
.
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
SE
C
T
I
O
N
4
SE
C
T
I
O
N
3
SE
C
T
I
O
N
2
SE
C
T
I
O
N
1
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
N
O
R
T
H
LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTSLUMMUS PARK CONCEPT PLAN AND KEYS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
N
17
18
LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTSLUMMUS PARK - SOUTH N
1
3
229
10
13
12 12
12 1213
11
11
9
5
8 8
5
6
7
Ocean Drive Ocean Drive
5t
h
S
t
.
6t
h
S
t
.
7t
h
S
t
.
8t
h
S
t
.
9t
h
S
t
.
1. Culdesac Turn-Around
2. Beach Access
3. Open Plaza
4. Native Vegetation
5. Pavilions
6. Volleyball/ Large Events
7. Muscle Beach
8. Boardwalk
9. Native Dune
10. Maintenance/Storage
11. Outdoor Dining
12. Street-end Plazas
13. Coconut Palm Groves
LEGEND
Dense Native Planting
Coconut Groves
Dune Planting
Permeable Paving
Play Surface
Sand
Water Feature
SE
C
T
I
O
N
1
11
11
11
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
O
U
T
H
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
19
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
DI
N
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
OC
E
A
N
D
R
I
V
E
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
BE
A
C
H
W
A
L
K
P
A
T
H
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
D
U
N
E
BE
A
C
H
EV
E
N
T
&
S
P
O
R
T
S
A
R
E
A
SITE SECTION 1
20
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - EXISTING CONDITIONSIDEWALK
21
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - PROPOSEDEXPANDED SIDEWALK
22
2
2
3
5 5
3 3 3
10
12
10
11
13
14 14 14 14
15
13 13
11
6
88 8 8
87
9
9
1 144
9t
h
S
t
.
10
t
h
S
t
.
11
t
h
S
t
.
12
t
h
S
t
.
Ocean DriveOcean Drive
1. Boardwalk
2. Topographic Trail - Natural Amphitheater
3. Landscape Pocket - Art Moments
4. Ocean Lookout
5. Overlook Structures - Stage
6. Open Air Plaza
7. Existing Lifeguard Headquarters/ Exhibition
8. Coconut Palm Groves
9. Elevated Catwalk
10.Beach Access
11. Native Dune
12.Playground - Splashpad
13. Street-end Plazas
14. Outdoor Dining
LEGEND Dense Native Planting
Coconut Groves
Dune Planting
Permeable Paving
Play Surface
Sand
Water Feature
SE
C
T
I
O
N
2
SE
C
T
I
O
N
3
14
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
O
U
T
H
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
N
O
R
T
H
LUMMUS PARK - CENTER N
LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTS
15. Open Space/ Stage Area
16. Relocated Lifeguard Headquarters
17. Not-for-profit Organization
1716
23
| LUMMUS PARK CONCEPT - 10TH ST STREET-END OPTION 1ART DECO MUSEUM BUILDING AND PLAZA
24
| LUMMUS PARK CONCEPT - 10TH ST STREET-END OPTION 2OPEN PLAZA/ STAGE
25
Public Art and Open Plaza at St. Pete Pier
26
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
DI
N
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
OC
E
A
N
D
R
I
V
E
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
DU
N
E
E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
NA
T
I
V
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
AR
T
N
O
D
E
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
D
U
N
E
BE
A
C
H
SITE SECTION 3
SITE SECTION 2
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
DI
N
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
OC
E
A
N
D
R
I
V
E
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
CA
T
W
A
L
K
AR
T
N
O
D
E
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
PL
A
Z
A
RE
S
T
R
O
O
M
S
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
D
U
N
E
BE
A
C
H
27
LUMMUS PARK CONCEPTSLUMMUS PARK - NORTH N
5
6
996
10 10
10
6
6
333
2
4
4
4
1
5
7
8
1
12
t
h
S
t
.
13
t
h
S
t
.
14
t
h
S
t
.
15
t
h
S
t
.
Ocean Drive
Ocean Drive
1. Boardwalk
2. Topographic Trail
3. Landscape Pocket - Art Moments
4. Beach Access
5. Playground - Splash Pad
6. Coconut Palm Groves
7. Dog Park
8. Hammock Area
9. Street-end Plazas
10. Outdoor Dining
LEGEND
Dense Native Planting
Coconut Groves
Dune Planting
Permeable Paving
Play Surface
Sand
Water Feature
SE
C
T
I
O
N
4
10
1
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
N
O
R
T
H
28
SITE SECTION 4
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
DI
N
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
OC
E
A
N
D
R
I
V
E
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
LU
M
M
U
S
P
A
R
K
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
BE
A
C
H
W
A
L
K
P
A
T
H
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
D
U
N
E
BE
A
C
H
DO
G
P
A
R
K
29
CREATE A COMPREHENSIVE3 TRANSIT AND MOBILITY PLAN
30
Mobility District
[Alton+Dade]
Flamingo Park Historic District
Limited AccessCultural District
OVERALL DISTRICTTRANSIT AND MOBILITY
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
Co
l
l
i
n
s
A
v
e
Oc
e
a
n
D
r
N
31
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE BOARDWALK
LUMMUS PARK ATLANTIC OCEAN
10TH ST
9TH ST
OC
E
A
N
D
R
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
8TH ST
SEA OATS
EA
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
SIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALK1 MINUTE WALK(approx. 300’)1 MINUTE WALK(approx. 300’)SIDEWALK
WE
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
SIDEWALK
FIR
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
FIR
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
LUMMUS PARKOCEAN DRIVECOLLINS AVE WASHINGTON AVE 15’38’40’12’34’34’5’10’10’10’10’134’20’-3”142’25’25’20’50’320’MULTIPURPOSE AREA BEACH ATLANTIC OCEANEL. 13’-00”EL. 9’-00”EL. 0’-00”EL. 6’-00”EXISTING ROW LINE WESTERNMOST EDGE OF SERPENTINE WALL EASTERNMOST EDGE OF SERPENTINE WALL EROSION CONTROL LINEMIAMI BEACH SECTION Scale 1/64” = 1’-0”
OC
E
A
N
R
E
S
C
U
E
ACCESS0 25’50’100’
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
BO
A
R
D
W
A
L
K
LUMMUS PARK ATLANTIC
OCEAN
10TH ST
9TH ST
OC
E
A
N
D
R
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
8TH ST
SE
A
O
A
T
S
EA
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
1 MINUTE WALK(approx. 300’)1 MINUTE WALK(approx. 300’)
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
WE
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
FI
R
E
L
A
N
E
L
I
N
E
LUMMUS PARKOCEAN DRIVECOLLINS AVE WASHINGTON AVE
15’38’40’12’34’34’5’10’10’10’10’134’20’-3”142’25’25’20’50’320’
MULTIPURPOSE AREA BEACH ATLANTIC OCEAN
EL. 13’-00”
EL. 9’-00”
EL. 0’-00”
EL. 6’-00”
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
R
O
W
L
I
N
E
WE
S
T
E
R
N
M
O
S
T
E
D
G
E
OF
S
E
R
P
E
N
T
I
N
E
W
A
L
L
EA
S
T
E
R
N
M
O
S
T
E
D
G
E
OF
S
E
R
P
E
N
T
I
N
E
W
A
L
L
ER
O
S
I
O
N
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
L
I
N
E
MIAMI BEACH SECTION
Scale 1/64” = 1’-0”
OC
E
A
N
R
E
S
C
U
E
AC
C
E
S
S
0 25’50’100’
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
A
C
C
E
S
S
WASHINGTON AVE 5TH ST TO 17TH ST
[1.25 MILES]
5TH ST TO 17TH ST
[1.25 MILES]
5TH ST TO 15TH ST
[0.9 MILES]
COLLINS AVE
Transportation Priority: District Access/ All modes
Ownership: Miami-Dade County
AADT (2019) : 23,000
AADT (2020) : 14,100
Future AADT (2035) : 22,818
Current Number of Lanes: 3 (2 through lanes plus left-turns at intersections)
Functional Classification: Major Collector (Urban)
Florida Context: N/A
Study Area Priorities:
• Regional transit connections• Multimodal connections• Access to Art Deco Cultural District
Transportation Priority: Local Circulation/ Access
Ownership: FDOT
AADT (2019) : 12,900
AADT (2020) : 14,500
Future AADT (2035) : 20,011
Current Number of Lanes: 3 (2 through lanes plus left-turns at intersections)
Functional Classification: Principal Arterial (Other Urban)
Florida Context: C-5
Study Area Priorities:
• Circulation• Hotel pick-ups and drop-offs• Deliveries• Walking, biking, local transit
Transportation Priority: Walking + Greenspace
Ownership: City of Miami Beach
AADT (2019) : N/A
AADT (2020) : N/A
Future AADT (2035) : N/A
Current Number of Lanes: 0
Functional Classification: Local
Florida Context: N/A
Study Area Priorities:
• Cultural venue, park, beach & resident access• Hotel pick-ups and drop-offs• Deliveries• Strolling
OCEAN DR
LO
C
A
L
C
I
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
/
P
A
R
K
STUDY CORRIDOR SUMMARYACCESS
32
Ocean DrPark + Pedestrian Street
33
WALK
15’
WALK LUMMUS PARK
10’
PARK
7’
EXTENDED
SIDEWALK AUTO
15’10.5’
63’ ROW +/-
WALK
15’
WALK LUMMUS PARK
10’
VALET
PARK7’
PARK
7’
AUTO AUTO
10.5’10.5’
63’ ROW +/-
Existing / Pre-Pandemic Existing / During Pandemic Existing / During Pandemic Images
_Pedestrianization of street
_Extended sidewalk on west side
_1 travel lane northbound
_1 travel lane southbound
_Parking/Valet/Drop-off zone
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTSEXISTING CONDITIONS
40%60%100%
34
PROPOSED PARK + TWO-WAY LIMITED ACCESS STREET
+24’
SEATINGWALK PLANT
22’10’8’
WALK LUMMUS
PARK15’
CURB-
SIDE
DR
O
P
-
O
F
F
8’
AUTO AUTO
10’10’
86’ ROW +/-
_1 travel lane northbound
_1 travel lane southbound
_Curbside on West side
_Shared bike
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 1
[Curbside]
64%36%
[No Curbside]
73%27%
35
DR
O
P
-
O
F
F
+24’
SEATINGWALK PLANT
22’10’8’
WALK LUMMUS
PARK15’
CURB-
SIDE8’
AUTO BIKE
10’10’
86’ ROW +/-
_1 travel way southbound street
_Curbside on west side
_Two-way bikeway
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 2PROPOSED PARK + ONE WAY LIMITED ACCESS STREET
Curbside
76%24%
No Curbside
85%15%
36
SEATINGWALK WALK/ EMERG.
23’20’20’
LUMMUS PARK
63’ ROW +/-
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 3PROPOSED PARK + PEDESTRIAN ONLY STREET
_Pedestrian street
_Center seating area 100%
37
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS[PARK + LIMITED VEHICLE ACCESS STREET]
Existing Street
38
PROPOSED PARK + TWO-WAY LIMITED ACCESS STREET| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 1
39
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 2PROPOSED PARK + ONE WAY LIMITED ACCESS STREET
40
| OCEAN DRIVE CONCEPTS - OPTION 3PROPOSED PARK + PEDESTRIAN ONLY STREET
41
42
Collins AveShared Transit Street
O1 O2A O2BLater Phase Later PhaseInterim
Two-Way Collins Avenue
Circulator connection between
Washington Ave and Collins Ave
Monorail connection in place, circulator moves
to Washington Ave, with transfer station between
Lenox Ave and Michigan Ave
Monorail connection in place, circulator moves
to Washington Ave, with transfer station between
Washington Ave and Collins Ave
Two-Way Collins Avenue Two-Way Washington Avenue
| LOCAL CIRCULATOR N
No Curbside
67%33%
40%60%
CURB-
SIDE
CURB-
SIDE8’8’
WALKWALK
12’12’
WOONERF
20’
60’ ROW +/-
WALKWALK
6’6’
PARKPARK
8’8’
AUTO
11’
AUTOAUTO
9’9’
TU
R
N
I
N
G
LA
N
E
60’ ROW +/-
Co
l
l
i
n
s
Existing Proposed - Two-Way Circulator Collins Avenue
Existing
Proposed
_2 bi-directional travel lanes
_Circulator street with woonerf
_Wider sidewalks
_Sharrow lanes
_Parking/ transit stop areas
_2 bi-directional travel lanes
_Shared turning lane
_On-street parking both direction
_Sharrow lanes
| COLLINS AVENUESHARED TRANSIT STREET
Currently, Collins Avenue has two (2) 6 ft sidewalks, two (2) bi-directional sharrow travel
lanes, one (1) shared turning lanes and on street parking on both directions.
20%80%
Curbside
45
NACTO: Shared Transit Street
Two-Way Circulator Collins Avenue
| COLLINS AVENUE[SHARED TRANSIT STREET]
46
Co
l
l
i
n
s
| COLLINS AVENUE
Two-Way Circulator Collins Avenue - Existing Street
[SHARED TRANSIT STREET]
Existing Street
47
Co
l
l
i
n
s
Two-Way Circulator Collins Avenue - Proposed Street
| COLLINS AVENUE[SHARED TRANSIT STREET]
Proposed Street
48
District Access Transit StreetWashington Ave
WALK
12’
WALK
12’
BIKE
8’
BIKE
8’
PARK
10’
PARK
8’
AUTO
10’
MEDIAN/
TURN14’
AUTO
10’
100’ ROW +/-
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
WALK
12’
WALK
12’
BIKE BIKEPARK
6’7’8’
TRANSIT
11’
AUTO
11’
AUTO
11’
100’ ROW +/-
STOP/
TURN/
MEDIAN11’
TRANSIT
11’
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
Future: when transit is in place and there is a demand of 12+ buses per hour, Washington
Ave should be reconfigured to have a dedicated transit lane
Existing - Result of the Pilot Project
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
LONG TERM VISION:
_2 bi-directional travel lanes
_Dedicated bus lanes
_Transit stop/median/turning lanes adjacent to
dedicated bus lane
_On-street parking/ drop-off zone on East side
_Bike lanes
_2 bi-directional travel lanes
_Median/ turning lane
_On-street parking
_Bike lanes
| WASHINGTON AVENUEDISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET
40%60%
48%52%
50
EXISTING
N| WASHINGTON AVENUE[DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET]
1
0
T
H
S
T
1
1
T
H
S
T
WASHINGTON AVE
51
DEDICATED TRANSIT
LOADING LOADINGDROP-OFFDROP-OFF
DEDICATED TRANSIT
1
0
T
H
S
T
1
1
T
H
S
T
NACTO: Dedicated Median Bus Lanes
PROPOSED
N| WASHINGTON AVENUE[DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET - LONG TERM VISION]
WASHINGTON AVE
52
| WASHINGTON AVENUE[DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET]
Existing Street
53
Proposed Street
| WASHINGTON AVENUE[DISTRICT ACCESS TRANSIT STREET]
54
Transit Plaza/Transfer Stations5th St + Lincoln Road
55
5th Street
PED
12’ +/-
PED
30’ +/- VARIES
BIKE BIKE
5’5’
AUTO AUTOAUTOAUTO AUTO AUTO
10.5’10.5’10.5’10’10.5’10.5’10.5’
MEDIAN
6’
140’ ROW +/-
STRIPES
| 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION
5th Street
EXTEND END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL - BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND COLLINS
PED
12’ +/-
PED
30’ +/- VARIES
AUTO AUTO TRANSIT
15’15’12’
MONORAIL STATION
28.5’ +/-
140’ ROW +/-
BIKE BIKE
8’8’
Proposed
Existing
43%57%
65%35%
56
Existing
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
5TH ST
OC
E
A
N
D
R
Proposed
MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL STATION
N
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
5TH ST
| 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTIONEXTEND END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL - BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND COLLINS
57
OC
E
A
N
D
R
5th Street
| 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing
EXTEND END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL - BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND COLLINS
58
5th Street
Proposed
| 5TH STREET CIRCULATOR CONNECTION PROPOSEDEXTEND END OF MIAMI BEACH MONORAIL - BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND COLLINS
59
5th Street
Existing
SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3
ZONE A
[Existing]
+ 3 lanes westbound
+ 2 lanes and 2 turning lanes eastbound
+ Bike lanes each direction
ZONE B
[Existing]
+ 3 lanes and 1 turning lane westbound
+ 2 lanes and 1 turning lane eastbound
+ Bike lanes each direction
ZONE C
[Existing]
+2 lanes + 1 turning lane westbound
+ 2 lanes eastbound
+ NO Bike lanes
| 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA EXISTING - INTERIM CONDITION
N
TRANSIT PLAZA: VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
C
T
OC
E
A
N
D
R
OC
E
A
N
C
T
5TH ST
60
5th Street
SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3
Proposed
ZONE A
[Existing]
+ 3 lanes westbound
+ 2 lanes and 2 turning lanes eastbound
+ Bike lanes each direction
ZONE B
[Existing]
+ 1 lane and 1 turning lane westbound
+ 1 lane and 1 turning lane eastbound
+ Circulator stop eastbound
+ Bike lanes each direction
ZONE C
[Existing]
+ 1 lane westbound
+ 1 lane eastbound
+ Bike lanes each direction
| 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA PROPOSED - INTERIM CONDITION
N
TRANSIT PLAZA: VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
C
T
OC
E
A
N
D
R
OC
E
A
N
C
T
5TH ST
61
| 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA EXISTING - INTERIM CONDITION
Existing
TRANSIT PLAZA: VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE
62
| 5TH STREET TRANSIT PLAZA PROPOSED - INTERIM CONDITION
Proposed
TRANSIT PLAZA: VEHICULAR LIMITED ACCESS ZONE
63 Existing SECTION 1
PED
28’ +/-
PED
15’ +/-
MEDIAN
9’
AUTO AUTOAUTO AUTO
11’11’11’11’
| LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT EXISTING CONDITIONS
N
TRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION
LINCOLN RD
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
JA
M
E
S
A
V
E
64
PED
18’ +/-
PED
18’ +/-
AUTO AUTO
11’11’
TRANSIT TRANSIT
11’11’
TRANSIT
STOP
TRANSIT
STOP8’8’
Proposed
| LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT PROPOSED
N
TRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION
SECTION 1
LINCOLN RD
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
JA
M
E
S
A
V
E
65 16TH ST MALL. DENVER
| LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPTTRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION
66
| LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT
TRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION
Existing
67
WOONERF + NEW BUS HUB AT LINCOLN ROAD, WASHINGTON AVE AND COLLINS AVE
| LINCOLN RD/ WASHINGTON AVE/ COLLINS AVE CONCEPT
Proposed
TRANSIT MALL: TRANSFER STATION
68
ONE WAY STREETSEAST/WEST STREETS
69
| EAST- WEST CONNECTIONSEXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW
N
70
| EAST- WEST CONNECTIONSPROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW
N
WALK WALK
9’9’
PARK PARK
7’7’
AUTO AUTO
9’9’
54’ ROW +/-
EA
S
T
-
W
E
S
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
EA
S
T
-
W
E
S
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
WALK WALK
16’9’
BIKE CURB-
SIDE8’7’
AUTO
10
54’ ROW +/-
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
_One travel lane
_On-street parking/ drop-off zone/ loading area
on South side
_Protected bike lane on North side
_Wider North side sidewalk with planting areas
_Two bi-directional travel lanes
_On-street parking
_Sidewalks
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS
ONE-WAY STREET
35%65%
63%37%
72 Existing
SECTION 1
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
OC
E
A
N
D
R
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
C
T
OC
E
A
N
C
T
N| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS EXISTING CONDITIONTWO-WAY STREET
73
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS PROPOSED OPTION 1
SECTION 1
ONE-WAY STREET LIMITED VEHICLE ACCESS
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
CO
L
L
I
N
S
C
T
OC
E
A
N
C
T
OC
E
A
N
D
R
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
Loading
One-way
street
Valet zoneWider turning
radius for
access to
alley
Left-side bike lane improves
motorists and bicyclists visibility
by having the bike lane on the
driver’s side and minimizes
door zone conflicts.
Loading zone
with time
restrictions
Drop-off zoneWider
sidewalks
allows for
planting areas
C
C
Beginning of
Restricted Zone
Proposed
N
74
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS PROPOSED OPTION 2
SECTION 1
ONE-WAY STREET PEDESTRIAN ONLY
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
Loading Loading
(Small)
Wider turning
radius for
access to
alley
Wider
sidewalks
allows for
planting
areas
Valet/
Drop-off
zone
Pedestrian
only zone
C
C
Beginning of
Restricted Zone
Proposed
Loading zone
with time
restrictions
Valet/
Drop-off
zone
Left-side bike lane improves
motorists and bicyclists
visibility by having the bike
lane on the driver’s side and
minimizes door zone conflicts
OC
E
A
N
D
R
CO
L
L
I
N
S
C
T
OC
E
A
N
C
T
N
75
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS PROPOSED OPTION 3
SECTION 1
ONE-WAY STREET PEDESTRIAN ONLY
CO
L
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
WA
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
Loading
C
C
Proposed
Valet/
Drop-off
zoneLoading zone
with time
restrictions
Wider turning
radius for
access to
alley
Left-side bike lane improves
motorists and bicyclists
visibility by having the bike
lane on the driver’s side and
minimizes door zone conflicts
Wider
sidewalks
allows for
planting
areas
Pedestrian
only zone
Beginning of
Restricted Zone
OC
E
A
N
D
R
CO
L
L
I
N
S
C
T
OC
E
A
N
C
T
N
76
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS EXISTING CONDITIONTWO-WAY STREET
77
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS INTERIM CONDITION (PILOT PROJECT)ONE-WAY STREET
78 Proposed
| EAST - WEST CONNECTIONS PROPOSEDONE-WAY STREET LIMITED VEHICLE ACCESS
| ALLEYWAYS
Option A:
PROS: Regulate bigger setbacks on reconstruction or new projects
(5ft setback)
CONS: It can take a long time before the alley gets wider
Option B: Keep the same rear building line, but needs to start
developing the alleyway and opening up the back of the buildings for
better loading, garbage, and other uses.
Option A
Option B
APPROACH
AL
L
E
Y
AL
L
E
Y
5’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
0’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
5’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
0’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
80
4ZONINGINCENTIVES
81
| CRA OVERLAY ON THE MXE DISTRICT
CRA and MXE Overlap Zone
Overlap
N
Ocean DrPark + Pedestrian Street
82
4
2
2
3 2 4
3 4 2
4
4
3 4 4 4
4
3
3
3 2
4
1
0
T
H
S
T
9
T
H
S
T
8
T
H
S
T
7
T
H
S
T
6
T
H
S
T
1
2
T
H
S
T
1
3
T
H
S
T
1
4
T
H
P
L
1
4
T
H
S
T
1
1
T
H
S
T
OCEAN DR
LUMMUS
PARK
COLLINS AVE
WASHINGTO
N
A
V
E
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK BUILDINGS BELOW 50’
BUILDING HEIGHT < 50’
2 LEVELS
3 LEVELS
4 LEVELS
83
1
0
T
H
S
T
9
T
H
S
T
8
T
H
S
T
7
T
H
S
T
6
T
H
S
T
1
2
T
H
S
T
1
3
T
H
S
T
1
4
T
H
P
L
1
4
T
H
S
T
1
1
T
H
S
T
OCEAN DR
LUMMUS
PARK
COLLINS AVE
WASHINGTO
N
A
V
E
SAME OWNERSHIP BUILDINGS
ON OCEAN DR
SAME OWNERSHIP BUILDINGS
ON OCEAN DR& COLLINS AVE
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OWNERSHIP PARCEL ANALYSIS
| ZONING TESTING
4
2
2
3 2 4
3 4 2
4
4
3 4 4 4
4
3
3
3 2
4
84
85
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
• 5’ REAR SETBACK
• RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING ALLOWED ONLY AT THE REAR
AND IF THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS RENOVATED
• FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS CAN BUILD UP TO
THE SAME NON CONFORMITY
• MAX HEIGHT 50’ OR 1 LEVEL, WHICHEVER IS LESS FOR
MID-BLOCK BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
• 70’ - 80’ FRONT SETBACK ON ROOF TOP ADDITIONS
• BUILDING LENGTH SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 150 FEET FOR
PARCELS THAT ARE WIDER THAN 150 FEET.
• ENCOURAGE GUEST ROOFTOP USES
• ALLOWED ROOF TOP USES: HOSPITALITY SUITE / AMENITIES
• POTENTIAL BONUS FAR (REFERENDUM?): HOSPITALITY SUITE /
AMENITIES AND ADDITIONAL HOTEL KEYS
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION/
RENOVATIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS
OC
E
A
N
C
T
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
OC
E
A
N
C
T
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
OC
E
A
N
D
R
OC
E
A
N
D
R
N
Scale 1/16” = 1’
THE LESLIE HOTEL
MECH
OFFICE
TOTAL AREA: 2,029 SF
TOTAL AREA: 2,029 SF
STG
STGKITCHEN
LA
U
N
D
R
Y
RESTROOMS GYM LOUNGE
VIRTUAL ROOMS
OFFICE
STGSTG
LA
U
N
D
R
Y
WC GYM LOUNGE
KITCHEN
LOT AREA: 130’ X 55’ = 7,150 SF
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,286 SF
TOTAL FAR: 2.41
35 KEYS (Avg. 200 SF/Key)
LOT AREA: 130’ X 55’ = 7,150 SF
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,160 SF
TOTAL FAR: 2.40
24 KEYS (Avg. 258 SF/Key)
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
TOTAL IMPROVED AREAS
DEMOLISHED: 3,650 SF (21.1% of building)
DEMOLISHED
130’
130’
55
’
55
’
5’
5’
5’
5’
5’
17
’
8
”
17
’
8
”
4’
1
0
”
17
’
9
”
17
’
5
”
5’
86
OC
E
A
N
C
T
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
OC
E
A
N
C
T
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
OC
E
A
N
D
R
OC
E
A
N
D
R
N
Scale 1/16” = 1’
CAVALIER HOTEL
LOT AREA: 130’ X 50’ = 6,500 SF
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,489 SF
TOTAL FAR: 2.69
46 KEYS (Avg. 153 SF/Key)
LOT AREA: 130’ X 50’ = 6,500 SF
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,420 SF
TOTAL FAR: 2.68
25 KEYS (Avg. 350 SF/Key)
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
TOTAL IMPROVED AREAS
DEMOLISHED: 5,132 SF (29% of building)
DEMOLISHED
TOTAL AREA: 2,498 SF
TOTAL AREA: 2,297 SF
MECH
MECH
LAUNDRY KITCHEN
KITCHEN
OFFICE
STG
OFFICE
WC
WC
EMPLOYEE ROOM
EMPLOYEE ROOM
STG MAINT.
130’
130’
50
’
50
’
4’
8
”
4’
8
”
5’
5’
1
”
5’
1
”
17
’
7
1
/
2
”
17
’
7
1
/
2
”
5’
87
88
| ZONING TESTING
RECONSTRUCTION TESTING
AL
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
AL
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
OC
E
A
N
D
R
OC
E
A
N
D
R
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
ROOF TOP ADDITION
RECONSTRUCT
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
5’
70’ FRONT SETBACK FOR ROOF TOP ADDITIONS
70’ EXISTINGBUILDING RENOVATIONBUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
35 KEYS (Avg. 200 SF/Key)
TOTAL FAR: 2.40
LOT AREA: 130’ X 55’ = 7,150 S
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,286 SF
22 KEYS (Avg. 370 SF/Key)
TOTAL FAR: 2.40
LOT AREA: 130’ X 55’ = 7,150 SF
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,139 SF
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
EXISTING MAX 50’ HEIGHT
POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION AT 70’
130’
130’
9’
10
’
-
6
”
19
’
-
6
”
10
’
-
6
”
12
’
-
8
”
12
’
-
4
”
9’
10
’
-
6
”
10
’
-
6
”
12
’
-
8
”
Basement Level-5’-0”
Grade
-2’-0”
Lobby Level0’-0”
Second Floor Level14’-6”
Third Floor Level25’-0”
Top of Structure37’-8”
Top of Addition
50’-0”
Mezzanine Level
+4’-0”
Basement Level
-5’-0”
Grade-2’-0”
Lobby Level
0’-0”
Second Floor Level
14’-6”
Third Floor Level
25’-0”
Top of Structure37’-8”
Mezzanine Level+4’-0”
89
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
57%
OF BUILDING
AREA
OCEAN D
R
OCEAN D
RLUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
LUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
OCEAN C
T
OCEAN C
T
BA
S
E
M
E
N
T
LE
V
E
L
1
LE
V
E
L
2
LE
V
E
L
3
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
70’
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
Maximum building
envelope that can
never be filled
Potential building
reconstruction represents up
to 57% including basement
50’ HEIGHT
EXISTING POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION
- RECONSTRUCT BEYOND 70’
13
0
’
55’55’
13
0
’
13
0
’
90
Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net
Basement 1,047 SF 890 SF
Ground Level 2,159 SF 1,835 SF
Level 2 2,418 SF 2,055 SF
Level 3 2,418 SF 2,055 SF
Basement 646 SF 549 SF
Ground Level 1,292 SF 1,098 SF
Level 2 2,475 SF 2,104 SF
Level 3 2,475 SF 2,104 SF
Addition Level 4 2,209 SF 1,878 SF
17,139 SF 14,568 SF
2.40
2.40TOTAL FAR EXISTING
TOTAL KEYS 22 Units
OCEAN DRIVE ‐ Leslie Hotel at 70'
[BASE FAR]
Renovate
Existing
Reconstruct
Existing
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FAR PROPOSED
70 FT SETBACK
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
50’
H
E
I
G
H
T
OCEAN D
R LUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
OCEAN C
T
+ one (1) floor
= 2.40 FAR
70’ EXISTINGBUILDING RENOVATIONBUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED
ROOF TOP ADDITION
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR*
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
55’
13
0
’
5’
70’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
91
Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net
Basement 1,047 SF 890 SF
Ground Level 2,159 SF 1,835 SF
Level 2 2,418 SF 2,055 SF
Level 3 2,418 SF 2,055 SF
Basement 646 SF 549 SF
Ground Level 1,292 SF 1,098 SF
Level 2 2,475 SF 2,104 SF
Level 3 2,475 SF 2,104 SF
Level 4 2,209 SF 1,878 SF
Level 5 2,209 SF 1,878 SF
19,348 SF 16,446 SF
2.40
2.70
TOTAL FAR EXISTING
TOTAL KEYS 26 Units
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FAR
Addition
Renovate
Existing
Reconstruct
Existing
OCEAN DRIVE ‐ Leslie Hotel at 70'
[BONUS FAR]70 FT SETBACK
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
50’
H
E
I
G
H
T
OCEAN D
R LUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
OCEAN C
T
+ two (2) floors
= 2.70 FAR
70’ EXISTINGBUILDING RENOVATIONBUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED BONUS FAR
ROOF TOP ADDITION
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* + 0.30 BONUS FAR
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
55’
13
0
’
70’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
5’
92
70 FT SETBACK
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
LUMMUS PARKPROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40’
PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10’
+ one (1) floor
= 2.40 FAR
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR*
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
93
+ two (2) floors
= 2.70 FAR
70 FT SETBACK
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
LUMMUS PARKPROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40’
PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10’
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* + 0.30 BONUS FAR
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
94
70 FT SETBACK
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
O
C
E
A
N
D
R
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR*
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
95
70 FT SETBACK
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
O
C
E
A
N
D
R
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* + 0.30 BONUS FAR
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
96
| ZONING TESTING
RECONSTRUCTION TESTING
AL
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
AL
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
OC
E
A
N
D
R
OC
E
A
N
D
R
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
ROOF TOP ADDITION
RECONSTRUCT
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
5’
80’ FRONT SETBACK FOR ROOF TOP ADDITIONS
80’ EXISTINGBUILDING RENOVATIONBUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
35 KEYS (Avg. 200 SF/Key)
TOTAL FAR: 2.40
LOT AREA: 130’ X 55’ = 7,150 S
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 17,286 SF
22 KEYS (Avg. 370 SF/Key)
TOTAL FAR: 2.40 or less
LOT AREA: 130’ X 55’ = 7,150 SF
TOTAL GROSS BUILDING AREA: 16,737 SF
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
EXISTING MAX 50’ HEIGHT
POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION AT 80’
130’
130’
9’
10
’
-
6
”
19
’
-
6
”
10
’
-
6
”
12
’
-
8
”
12
’
-
4
”
9’
10
’
-
6
”
10
’
-
6
”
12
’
-
8
”
Basement Level-5’-0”
Grade
-2’-0”
Lobby Level0’-0”
Second Floor Level14’-6”
Third Floor Level25’-0”
Top of Structure37’-8”
Top of Addition
50’-0”
Mezzanine Level
+4’-0”
Basement Level
-5’-0”
Grade-2’-0”
Lobby Level
0’-0”
Second Floor Level
14’-6”
Third Floor Level
25’-0”
Top of Structure37’-8”
Mezzanine Level+4’-0”
97
OCEAN D
R
OCEAN D
RLUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
LUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
OCEAN C
T
OCEAN C
T
BA
S
E
M
E
N
T
LE
V
E
L
1
LE
V
E
L
2
LE
V
E
L
3
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
80’
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
Maximum building
envelope that can
never be filled
Potential building
reconstruction represents up
to 43% including basement
50’ HEIGHT
EXISTING POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION
43%
OF BUILDING
AREA
13
0
’
55’55’
13
0
’
13
0
’
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT BEYOND 80’
98
Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net
Basement 1,299 SF 1,104 SF
Ground Level 2,663 SF 2,264 SF
Level 2 3,084 SF 2,621 SF
Level 3 3,084 SF 2,621 SF
Basement 394 SF 335 SF
Ground Level 788 SF 670 SF
Level 2 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
Level 3 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
Addition Level 4 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
16,739 SF 14,228 SF
2.40 or less
2.40
OCEAN DRIVE ‐ Leslie Hotel at 80'
[BASE FAR]
Renovate
Existing
Reconstruct
Existing
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FAR PROPOSED
TOTAL FAR EXISTING
TOTAL KEYS 22 Units
50’
H
E
I
G
H
T
OCEAN D
R LUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
OCEAN C
T
+ one (1) floor
= 2.40 or less FAR
80’ EXISTINGBUILDING RENOVATIONBUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED
ROOF TOP
ADDITION55’
13
0
’
5’
80’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
80 FT SETBACK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR*
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
99
Lot Area 7,150 SF Gross Net
Basement 1,299 SF 1,104 SF
Ground Level 2,663 SF 2,264 SF
Level 2 3,084 SF 2,621 SF
Level 3 3,084 SF 2,621 SF
Basement 394 SF 335 SF
Ground Level 788 SF 670 SF
Level 2 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
Level 3 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
Level 4 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
Level 5 1,809 SF 1,538 SF
18,548 SF 15,766 SF
2.40
2.60
OCEAN DRIVE ‐ Leslie Hotel at 80'
[BONUS FAR]
Renovate
Existing
TOTAL KEYS 25 Units
Reconstruct
Existing
Addition
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FAR
TOTAL FAR EXISTING
50’
H
E
I
G
H
T
OCEAN D
R LUMMU
S
P
A
R
K
OCEAN C
T
+ two (2) floors
= 2.60 FAR
BONUS FAR
80’ EXISTINGBUILDING RENOVATIONBUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
FAR REMOVED FAR RELOCATED
ROOF TOP
ADDITION55’
13
0
’
5’
80’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
80 FT SETBACK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* + 0.20 BONUS FAR
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
100
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR*
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
LUMMUS PARKPROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40’
PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10’
+ one (1) floor
= 2.40 or less
80 FT SETBACK
101
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
LUMMUS PARK
+ two (2) floors
= 2.60 FAR
PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 40’
PROPOSED SIDEWALK AT 10’
80 FT SETBACK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* + 0.20 BONUS FAR
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
102
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
OC
E
A
N
D
R
80 FT SETBACK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR*
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
103
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
OCEAN DRIVE MID-BLOCK
OC
E
A
N
D
R
80 FT SETBACK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.40 FAR* + 0.20 BONUS FAR
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
MODERN MEETS HISTORIC - ONE STORY ADDITIONS
| ZONING TESTING
104
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
MODERN MEETS HISTORIC - TWO STORY TERRACING ADDITIONS
| ZONING TESTING
105
Collins AveOFFICE AND RETAIL
106
• 5’ REAR SETBACK
• MAX HEIGHT 75’ OR 2 LEVELS, WHICHEVER IS LESS FOR
MID-BLOCK BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION
• 70’ FRONT SETBACK ON ROOF TOP ADDITIONS
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
ZONING CONSIDERATIONS :
107
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
COLLINS
A
V
E
COLLINS
A
V
E
OCEAN C
T
OCEAN C
T
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
70
’
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
Maximum building
envelope that can
never be filled
75’ HEIGHT
EXISTING POTENTIAL RECONSTRUCTION
- RECONSTRUCT BEYOND 70’
150’150’
14
0
’
14
0
’
14
0
’
108
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
COLLINS
A
V
E
OCEAN C
T
ROOF TERRACES
- RECONSTRUCT BEYOND THE 70’
ROOF TERRACE: 14,510SF
% OF LOT AREA: 69%
150’
14
0
’
109
Lot Area 21,000 SF Gross Net
Ground Level 8,400 SF 7,140 SF
Level 2 8,400 SF 7,140 SF
Level 3 5,600 SF 4,760 SF
Ground Level 9,100 SF 7,735 SF
Level 2 9,100 SF 7,735 SF
Level 3 5,850 SF 4,973 SF
Level 4 2,990 SF 2,542 SF
Level 5 2,990 SF 2,542 SF
52,430 SF 44,566 SF
2.50 2.12
Addt Retail 9,100 SF 7,735 SF
Addt Office 20,930 SF 17,791 SFTOTAL
Addition
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
Renovate
Existing
Reconstruct
Existing
COLLINS AVE ‐ MID‐BLOCK
TOTAL FAR PROPOSED
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.5 FAR
COLLINS
A
V
E
OCEAN C
T
75
’
H
E
I
G
H
T
+ two (2) floors
= 2.50 FAR
70
’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
150’
14
0
’
110
Lot Area 21,000 SF Gross Net
Ground Level 8,400 SF 7,140 SF
Level 2 8,400 SF 7,140 SF
Level 3 5,600 SF 4,760 SF
Ground Level 9,100 SF 7,735 SF
Level 2 9,100 SF 7,735 SF
Level 3 6,500 SF 5,525 SF
Level 4 3,550 SF 3,018 SF
Level 5 3,550 SF 3,018 SF
Level 6 3,550 SF 3,018 SF
57,750 SF 49,088 SF
2.75 2.3375
Addt Retail 9,100 SF 7,735 SF
Addt Office 26,250 SF 22,313 SF
COLLINS AVE ‐ MID‐BLOCK
Renovate
Existing
Reconstruct
Existing
Addition
TOTAL
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FAR PROPOSED
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK - RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.75 FAR
COLLINS
A
V
E
OCEAN C
T
75
’
H
E
I
G
H
T
+ three (3) floors
= 2.75 FAR
70
’
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
150’
14
0
’
111
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.5 FAR
+ two (2) floors
= 2.50 FAR
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
112
+ three (3) floors
= 2.75 FAR
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.75 FAR
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
113
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.5 FAR
COL
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
114
- RECONSTRUCT AT BASE 2.0 FAR + BONUS 0.75 FAR
COL
L
I
N
S
A
V
E
| ZONING TESTING
MXE - SUMMARY TESTING FAR AND HEIGHT
COLLINS AVENUE MID-BLOCK
115
*FAR IN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS
SUMMARY OF OCEAN DRIVE AND COLLINS AVENUE ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
COLLINS AVENUE
OCEAN DRIVE
- reconstruction at 70’ stepback
- reconstruction at 80’ stepback
2.40 BASE FAR* + 0.30 BONUS FAR 5 LEVELS at 50’ height, including basement (+1 BONUS LEVEL if approved by referendum)
2.40 BASE FAR* + 0.20 BONUS FAR 5 LEVELS at 50’ height, including basement (+1 BONUS LEVEL if approved by referendum)
- reconstruction at 70’ stepback
2.0 BASE FAR + 0.50 BONUS FAR 5 LEVELS at 63’ height
2.0 BASE FAR + 0.75 BONUS FAR 6 LEVELS at 75’ height
116
| ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
117
ZONING TOOLS
1. “SUNSET PROVISIONS”
2. PARTIAL OR COMPLETE WAIVING OF PARKING IMPACT FEES.
3. INCREASE FAR + HEIGHT FOR FIRST 2-3 CATALYST PROJECTS.
DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES
1. INCENTIVES IN HEIGHT + FAR [PAY TOWARDS PUBLIC PURPOSE FUND AND/OR ARTS FUNDING SOURCE ]
2. INCENTIVES WOULD APPLY ONLY TO HOSPITALITY, OFFICE AND PERFORMING ARTS USES,
3. NO PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR OFFICE USE ALONG COLLINS AVENUE.
4. ALLOW OFFICE AS CONVERSIONS OF INTERIOR BUILDINGS WHILE MAINTAINING HISTORIC COMPONENTS ALONG
COLLINS AVENUE.
5. ALLOW OFFICE COMMON AREAS IN GROUND FLOOR OF BUILDINGS ALONG COLLINS AVENUE.
DEVELOPER INVESTMENTS
1. NORTH-SOUTH BUILDING AGGREGATION ALONG COLLINS AVENUE ALLOWS FOR CONTINUOUS BUILDING FOOTPRINT.
2. “BUYOUT” OF CONDOMINIUM BUILDING (SINGLE OWNER APPROACH), PROVIDES ACCESS TO INCENTIVES.
| ZONING CONSIDERATIONS
118
Q & A5
119
CLOSING6REMARKS
120
THANK YOU!