Resolution 2022-32230 RESOLUTION NO 2022-32230
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)
BETWEEN THE CITY AND 3425 COLLINS, LLC (DEVELOPER), BASED UPON
THE ESSENTIAL TERMS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION AND PURSUANT
TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION
BOARD CONSOLIDATED ORDER, DATED MAY 25, 2021 (FILE NO. HPB20-
0441), INVOLVING JACK STEWART'S "APOLLO" MURAL; SAID MOU
REQUIRING DEVELOPER, AT ITS SOLE COST, TO RESTORE, TRANSPORT
AND INSTALL THE FULLY RESTORED MURAL ON THE NEW BUILDING FOR
FIRE STATION NO. 1.
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2021, an application was filed by 3425 Collins, LLC ("The
Developer") requesting modifications to a previously issued Certificate of Appropriateness for the
partial demolition, renovation and restoration of the existing 16-story hotel building, including the
total demolition of the 1955 south addition, and the construction of a new residential 16-story
detached ground level tower addition, and modifications to the site plan; and
WHEREAS, a mosaic tile mural entitled "Apollo" was introduced on the site in 1955,
concurrently with the construction of the previously existing Melvin Grossman designed south
addition; and
WHEREAS, the mural, created by artist Jack Stewart has approximately 92' in length by
17' in height, and was primarily located along the west elevation with a portion extending along
the south elevation, wrapping the corner; and
WHEREAS, in 2014, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the
demolition of the south addition inclusive of the artistic mural; and
WHEREAS, the mural was subsequently removed and relocated to a storage facility and
the 1955 addition was demolished; and
WHEREAS, approval of the Historic Preservation Board Consolidated Order dated May 25,
2021, required certain conditions be met by the Developer, including the donation of the Jack
Stewart "Apollo" mural to the City and covering all associated cost for its relocation and restoration;
and
WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new residential tower, the
Developer shall return to the Historic Preservation Board to present the final plan for the restoration
of the mural, including the specific location where it will be installed; and
WHEREAS, in July 2021, the Developer engaged the services of RLA Conservation to
assess the current condition of Apollo and recommend a conservation plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has considered a number of options in terms of locating the Apollo
mural on a City property; however, given the size of the mural, placement on an existing facility has
been challenging; and
WHEREAS, the Administration recommends that the best option would be for the Developer
to install the mural as an integrated architectural feature at the new Fire Station No. 1, once
completed; and
WHEREAS,the City and the Developer mutually agree upon the essential terms of the MOU,
which include requiring the Developer, at its sole cost, to undertake all aspects of restoring the
mural; conservation services; design and engineering fees; and upon completion of the restoration
and acceptance by the City of the condition of the restored mural, transporting the mural to a storage
location, designated by the City Manager's designee; transporting the mural from the City's storage
location to Fire Station 1; and installing the mural on the location of the new building for Fire Station
No. 1, to be designated by the City Manager's designee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FLORIDA that the Mayor and City Commission
hereby approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the City and 3425 Collins, LLC (Developer), based upon the essential terms set forth in this
Resolution and pursuant to the requirements of the City's Historic Preservation Board Consolidated
Order, dated May 25, 2021 (File No. HPB20-0441), involving Jack Stewart's "Apollo" mural; said MOU
requiring Developer, at its sole cost, to restore, transport and install the fully restored mural on the new
building for Fire Station No. 1.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of July 2022.
112—z "---_____.
DAN GELBER, MAYOR
ATTEST: JUt 2 5 2022
;B c�' 3
RAFAEL E. GRANADO, CITY CLERK ` '•
INCORP HAIM
14,5
._
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
7—ro-D-Z
City Attorney (�,,� Date
Resolutions -C7 S
MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
FROM: Alina T. Hudak, City Manager
DATE: July 20, 2022
SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)
BETWEEN THE CITY AND 3425 COLLINS, LLC (DEVELOPER), BASED
UPON THE ESSENTIAL TERMS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION AND
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S HISTORIC
PRESERVATION BOARD CONSOLIDATED ORDER, DATED MAY 25, 2021
(FILE NO. HPB 20-0441), INVOLVING JACK STEWART'S "APOLLO"
MURAL; SAID MOU REQUIRING DEVELOPER, AT ITS SOLE COST, TO
RESTORE, TRANSPORT AND INSTALL THE FULLY RESTORED MURAL
ON THE NEW BUILDING FOR FIRE STATION NO. 1.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt this Resolution.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
On May 11, 2021, an application was filed by 3425 Collins Avenue, LLC ("The Developer")
requesting modifications to a previously issued Certificate of Appropriateness for the partial
demolition renovation and restoration of the existing 16-story hotel building, including the total
demolition of the 1955 south addition, and the construction of a new 16-story detached ground
level addition. Specifically, the Developer requested approval of a redesigned new detached
ground level tower addition and modifications to the site plan. Approval of the Certificate of
Appropriateness required several conditions, including the following related to Jack Stewart's
Apollo mural (Attachment 1):
HPB20-0441 (Page 2 of 11)
C. The project would remain consistent with the criteria and requirements of section 118-564
and 133-50(a)if the following conditions are met:
b. The Developer has proffered to donate the Jack Stewart `Apollo"mural to the City
covering all the cost for its relocation and restoration. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit for the new residential tower, the Developer shall return to the Board to
present the final plan for the restoration of the mural including the specific location
Page 458 of 1502
where it will be installed.
A mosaic tile mural entitled Apollo was introduced on the site (3425 Collins Avenue) in 1955
concurrently with the construction of the previously existing Melvin Grossman designed south
addition. The mural, created by artist Jack Stewart, was primarily located along the west
elevation with a portion extending along south elevation, wrapping the corner. In 2014, the
Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved the demolition of the south addition
inclusive of the artistic mural. The mural was subsequently removed and relocated to a storage
facility and the 1955 addition was demolished. The Developer has submitted a letter dated
October 13, 2020 proffering to donate the mural to the City including covering all the cost for its
relocation and restoration (Attachment 2).
ANALYSIS
In July 2021, the Developer engaged the services of RLA Conservation to assess the current
condition of Apollo (Attachment 3). RLA Conservation's conservators Rosa Lowinger and
Caroline Dickensheets performed an assessment of the mosaic on July 22, 2021. A second
assessment, conducted by Dickensheets in conjunction with engineer Douglas Wood and Gal
Bensaadon of Red Door Construction was carried out on August 6, 2021.
At the time of the onsite inspections, the mosaic was found to be in very poor condition at the
storage site. The pieces are fracturing, tesserae have been lost, aluminum elements have been
bent and exhibit corrosion, and there is general dirt, grime, and bio-growth on elements. That
said, the mosaic remains a viable artwork that is fully conservable. Time, however, is of the
essence. The elements need to be rescued, cleaned and prepared for conservation sooner
rather than later or risk additional losses that will result in increased treatment costs and possible
irreparable damage. In response, the Developer has continued work with RLA Conservation
and has entered Phase II of restoration efforts (Attachment 4).
The City has considered a number of options in terms of locating the Apollo mural on a City
property. Several options were explored, including the facade of the Scott Rakow Youth
Center. However, given the size (approximately 92' in length by 17' in height) of the mural, placement
on an existing facility has been challenging. The Scott Rakow Youth Center facade, which was
proposed as a potential location at the February 9, 2021 Historic Preservation Board Meeting, is not
large enough to accommodate the mural.Administration recommends the best option would be for the
Developer to install the mural as an integrated architectural feature at the new Fire Station No. 1.
Attached to this report is a preliminary image of how this could potentially be accomplished
(Attachment 5).
In order to proceed with the restoration and site preparation, the City and the Developer must
enter into a Memorandum of Understanding, which requires the Developer, at its sole cost, to
undertake all aspects of restoring the mural, including, but not limited to, transportation,
conservation services, storage, design and engineering fees, and installation of the mural.
SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA
N/A
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
N/A
Page 459 of 1502
Amount(s)/Account(s):
N/A
Applicable Area
South Beach
Is this a "Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O.
to Know" item, pursuant to Bond Funds?
City Code Section 2-14?
No No
Strategic Connection
Prosperity - Market and promote Miami Beach as a world class arts, culture, and quality
entertainment destination.
Legislative Tracking
Tourism and Culture
Sponsor
Commissioner Alex Fernandez
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
o Attach. 1 HPB20-0441
o Attach. 2 Letter Proffering Mural to City Oct. 2020
o Attach. 3 RLA Assessment Phase 1
o Attach. 4 RLAAssessment Phase 2
o Attach. 5 Fire Station No 1 Rendering with Apollo
o Resolution
Page 460 of 1502
CFN:20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3173
DATE:06/04/2021 03:04:55 PM
HARVEY RUVIN,CLERK OF COURT,MIA-DADE CTY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
City of Miami Beach, Florida
MEETING DATE May 11, 2021
PROPERTY/FOLIO: 3425 Collins Avenue 02-3226 001-1440
FIE. NO: HPB2U-0441
IN RE: An application has been filed by 3425 Colins, LLC requesting modifications
to a previously issued Certificate of Appropriateness for the partial
demolition renovation and restoration of the existing 16-story hotel building,
including the totai demolition of the 1955 south addition, and the
construction of a new 16-story detached ground level addition. Specifically,
the applicant is requesting approval of redesigned site and landscape plans
including the introduction of several structures within the front and rear of
the site and variances from the requirements of the Oceanfront and Dune
Preservation overlay districts and a variance to reduce the required front
setback.
LEGAL Lots 1 through 8 inclusive, and the 16.00 foot Alley all in Block 21,
AMENDED PLAT OF OCEAN FRONT PROPERTY OF THE MIAMI
BEACH SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat
Book 5, Pages 7 and 8, of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County,
Florida.
CONSOLIDATED ORDER
The City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT,
based upon the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing
and which are part of the record for this matter
I. Certificate of Appropriateness
A. The subject site is located within the Collins Waterfront Local Historic District.
B. Based on the plans and documents submitted with the application, testimony and
information provided by the applicant, and the reasons set forth in the Planning
Department Staff Report, the project as submitted:
1. Is consistent with Sea Level Rise and Resiliency Review Criteria in Section 133-50(a)
of the Miami Beach Code.
2. is consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 11 8-564tai 1
of the Miami Beach Code.
3. is not consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria 'e" in Section 118-
64(02)of the Miami Beach Code.
4. Is consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria :n Section 1 i8-564(a)(3) of
the Miami Beach Code.
Page 461 of 1502 ,
CFN:20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3174
Page 2 of 11
HP1320 0441
Meeting Date: May 11. 2021
5. Is consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(f0(4)of the
Miami Beach Code.
C. The project would remain consistent with the criteria and requirements of section 1 1b-504
and 133-50(a)if the following conditions are met.
1. Revised elevation, site plan and floor plan drawings shall be submitted and. at a
minimum, such drawings shad incorporate the following:
a. The Board acknowledges and accepts the applicant's proffer to pay for nine (9)
injection wells at a total estimated value of$225,000, in a continuous system with
a total capacity of 18,000 GPM, which will provide water quality treatment for 27
acres in the Indian Creek drainage basin. The City shall select the sites for the
injection wells and conduct all construction work and the applicant shall finalize
e
such agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the new tower design.
b. The applicant has proffered to donate the Jack Stewart :.Apollo' mural to the City
including covering all the cost for its relocation, installation and restoration. Prior
to the issuance of a buildings permit for the new residential tower,the applicant shall
return to the Board to present the final plan for the restoration of the mural including
the specific location where it will be installed.
c. Final details of all exterior surface finishes and materials of the new residential
tower, including samples, shall be submitted, in a mariner to be reviewed and
approved by staff consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or
the directions from the Board.
d. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of the basement below
the existing Versailles Hotel building, the structural engineer of record shall submit
a letter to the Planning Department that includes a construction schedule
identifying events that render the historic building most vulnerable during the
excavation and demolition phases. The structural and/or shoring engineer of
record, or a designee licensed as a structural engineer in the State of Florida, shall
provide ansite supervision dunng these times. The engineer of record, or designee,
shall notify the Planning Department no iater than the next business day if there is
an indication of structural failure during this phase of construction.
a. No more than two curb cuts be-shall be permitted along the Collins Avenue
property line with the northern curb cut riot to exceed 12'-O" in width and the
southern curb cut not to exceed 24 0' in width, in a manner to he reviewed and
approved by staff consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or
the directions from the Board.
f. The design of the eastern extension shall be consistent with the pans entitled
'Amen Hotel & Residences", as prepared by Revuelta Architecture International,
dated January 12, 2021. The final details and materials of the new eastern
extension of the Versailles building, inclusive of balconies and guardrails shall be
Page 462 of 1502 „�'�>
CFN: 20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3175
Page 3 of 11
HPB20-•0441
Meeting Date: May 11, 2021
submitted, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff consistent with the
Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions from the Board. The
applicant shall explore more substantially designed column encasements. For the
columns located on the balcony projections.
g. The design of the porte cochere shall be consistent with the plans entitled "Amen
Hotel & Residences", as prepared by Revuelta'Architecture international, dated
January 12, 2021. Final details and materials of the porte-cochere on the west side
of the Versailles building shall be submitted, in a manner to be reviewed and
approved by staff consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or
the directions from the Board. All lighting and any required sprinkler systems shall
be completely recessed into the structure.
h. .The interior design, including but not limited to materials, finishes and lighting
elements of the new lobby of the Versailles huiiding, as shown in the plans dated
February 10, 2020, shall be further developed, in a manner to be reviewed and
approved by the Board prior to the issuance of a Building Permit or a revision to
any active Building Permit.
J. The design of the rooftop addition shall be consistent with the plans entitled'Amen
Hotel & Residences', as prepared by Revuelta Architecture international, dated
January 12, 2021. Final details and materials of the proposed rooftop addition shall
be submitted, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff consistent with
the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions from the Board.
The rooftop addition shall have a maximum floor to ceiling height of 12'--0 .
j. The loading space proposed to be located at the drop off area for the new
residential tower along Collins Avenue shall not be permitted. All loading spaces
required for the new residential tower shall be located internal to the structure.
k. Any kitchen equipment and venting systems associated with the ground level cafe
shall be chased internally through to the roof.
1. The maximum FAR for the project site shall riot exceed 3.0.
re, The facades of the existing building shall be fully restored to the greatest extent
possible, with the exceptions noted on the plans, in a manner to be reviewed and
approved by staff consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or
the directions from the Board.
ei. The original historic 'Versailles' signage located on the west elevation shall be
recreated to the greatest extent possible, according to available historic
documentation, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff consistent with
the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions from the Board.
o. Final design and details of the proposed entrance on the ground level of the north
side of the Versailles building shall be provided, in a manner to be reviewed and
approved by staff consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or
Page 463 of 1502 f" ;
FJl
CFN: 20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3176
Page 4 of 11
HPB20 0441
Meeting Date: May 11, 2t)21
the directions from the Board. The original windows to the west of the proposed
entrance shall be reintroduced to the greatest extent possible and the design of
the north entrance shad be consistent with the plans presented at the January 12,
2021 meeting.
p. Final details of all exterior surface finishes and materials for the historic Versailles
tower and the new residential tower, including samples, shall be submitted, in a
manner to be reviewed and approved by staff consistent with the Certificate of
Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions from the Board.
q. A museum quality historic analysis and display of the existing historic structure,
inclusive of a photographic and written description of the history and evolution of
the original building and its changes of use over time, shall be submitted to and
approved by staff, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or a
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy; such historic analysis shall be displayed
prominently within the public area of the historic structure, in a location to be
determined by staff.
r. All roof-top fixtures: air-conditioning units and mechanical devices shall be clearly
noted on a revised roof plan and elevation dray ings and shall be screened from
view, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff, consistent with the
Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions from the Board.
s. 'There shall be no TCC) or CO issued for the new residential tower portion of the
project until the exterior and public interior restoration, as approved by the Board,
of the Contributing structure on the site is substantially complete. Staff will perform
an inspection of the property to ensure substantial completeness of the approved
restoration prior to the approval of any TCO or CO for the new residential tower.
t. The applicant shall take every precaution to protect the adjacent structures during
construction, consistent with applicable strategies outlined :n the National Park
Service Preservation Tech Notes Bulletin entitled Temporary Protection, Number
3, Protecting a Historic Structure during Adjacent Construction, dated July 2001.
U. If the applicant proceeds with construction of additional basement area, the
applicant shall implement comprehensive stormwater management and
floodproofing systems in consultation with the Building and Public Works
Departments. The systems shall incorporate the following:
I. The stormwater management system shall be designed in accordance with the
0125-year storm event criteria, as determined by the Building Official.
ii. The stormwater management system shall include a combination of bio-swages
and/or rain gardens, exfiltration trenches, and stormwater injection wells.
iii. A conventional cistern shall be provided to collect and store runoff frorrl roof
and deck drains and shall include an overflow system to divert runoff to the
drainage wells.
Page 464 of 1502 f"'s
CFN:20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3177
Page 5 of 11
HPS2O-0441
Meeting Date.. May 11, 2021
iv. The existing and proposed basement area shall be dry floodproofed to BFE
+1 . The basement driveway entrance and exit shall be dry fioodproofed to BFE
+4.
v. Sump pumps shall be provided in the basement and shall have the capacity to
remove accumulated water, as well as all vapor and seepage of water during
a flooding event.
vi. Ali construction materials below BFE +1 shall be flood damage resistant.
vii. A Fioodproofing Emergency Operations Plan and a Floodproofinc Inspection
and Maintenance Pian shall be filed with the Building Department.
v. The applicant shall submit an engineering analysis confirming that the basement
area could be modified to expand water management capacity at a future point in
time where the basement is compromised and can no longer serve other functions,
in a manner to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. in
consultation with the Building and Public Works Departments.
w. Final design and details of the proposed front yard guardhouses and rear yard
accessory structures shall be provided. in a manner to be reviewed and approved
by staff, consistent. with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the
directions from the Board.
x. The outdoor bar counter shall be screened in a manner that it is not visible from
any point along the property line adjacent to any right-of-way including the public
Beachwa€k.
Within the Dune Preservation Overlay District, any walkway. ramp or deck shall
be constructed of wood material on v. Any wood deck shall be setback a minimum
of 10.-0"from the erosion contra? line.
x. The area within the Dune Preservation Overlay District shall have a minimum
required open space of 80%. The open space shall consist of natural landscape,
sand beach and may also incorporate artificial turf for up to 50%of the open space
requirement. Any artificial turf shall not be located within a required side yard.
aa. Within the Oceanfront Overlay District. any deck shall be setback a minimum of
10'-0"from the bulkhead tine,
bb. The area within the Oceanfront Overlay District shall have a maximum required
lot coverage of 50%. A minimum of 50%of the area shall be open to the sky and
landscaped
2. In accordance with Section 118-395tb f2; of the City Code, the requirement pertaining to
an existing structure's setbacks and parking credits, is hereby waived, to allow for the
reconstruction of the original floor slabs.
Page 465 of 1502
CFN:20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3178
Page 6 of 11
HPB2O-044I
Meeting Date: May 1, 2021
3. Site plan approval is contingent upon meeting Public School Concurrency requirements.
Applicant shall obtain a valid School Concurrency Determination Certificate (Certificate)
issued by the MiamiDade County Pudic Schools. The Certificate shall state the number
of seats reserved at each school level. In the event sufficient seats are not available, a
proportionate share mitigation pan shall be incorporated into a tri-party development
agreement and duly executed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
4. A revised landscape plan, prepared by a Professional Landscape Architect, registered in
the State of Florida, and corresponding site plan, shall be submitted to and approved by
staff. The species type, quantity, dimensions: spacing, location and overall height of all
plant material shall be clearly delineated and subject to the review and approval by staff,
consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions from the
Board. At a minimum, such plan shall incorporate the following:
a. Street trees shall be required along 35th Street and Collins Avenue, if feasible, in
a manner to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department.
b. A fully automatic irrigation system with 100% coverage and an automatic rain
sensor in order to render the system inoperative in the event of rain. Right-of-way
areas shall also be incorporated as part of the irrigation system.
c. Any overhead utilities located in the adjacent public right-of-ways. shall be placed
underground, if feasible, and subject to the review and approval of the Public
Works Department.
d. A view corridor shall be created by maintaining a minimum of 50% of the required
rear.yard setback open and unencumbered,apart from landscaping and decorative
open picket fences. from the erosion control line to the rear set tacit Inc.
e. All shrubs, hedges, low planting and ground cover, and any non-tree proposed to
be located within the front yard of the propert , shall not exceed 42" in height at
maturity.
f, The front yard landscaoing.planshall be further developed in a more forma , less
dense manner that preserves views to the Versailles Hotel.
gr Finaldetails of tha....prgosed planting ytem_.for the guardhouses shall be
provided.
h. The project design shall minimize the potential for a project causing a heat island
effect on site.
i. Cool pavement materials or porous pavement materials shall be utilized.
:. The use of Silva Ceils or approved equal shouldbe .specified for canopy shade
trees.planted in areas where rooting space:may be limited,inclusive of street trees.
Page 466 of 1502 Y
CFN: 20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3179
Page 7 of 11
FHPB2O-044'1
Meeting Date. May 11, 2021
in accordance with Section 118-537, the applicant, the ow ner(s) of the subject property,
the City Manager; Miami Design Preservation League, Dade Heritage Trust, or an affected
person may appeal the Board's decision on a Certificate of Appropriateness to a special
master appointed by the City Commission.
U. Variance(s)
A. The appicar'_fiied an. appiicati n wtth._the Planning Department for the following
variance(s); . ........ .._
1. A variance to reduce by 5'-2"the required setback of 15:-0' from the side property
line in order to construct a walkway with guardrails at 9'-10" from the north side
property line on the Dune Preservation Overlay District. (Variance request
withdrawn by applicant)
A variance to reduce by 10-9`the required setback of 15 -0'from the side property
line in order to construct a walkway with guardrails at 4`-3" from the south side
property line on the Dune Preservation Overlay District. (Variance request
withdrawn by applicant)
3. A variance to reduce by 5'-2"the required setback of 15'-0" from the side property
line in order to construct a walkway with guardrails at 9'-1O" from the north side
property line on the Oceanfront Overlay District. (Variance request withdrawn by
applicant]
4. A variance to reduce by 10'-9::the required setback of 15-0"from the side property
line in order to construct a walkway with guardrails at 4`-3" from the south side
property line on the Oceanfront Overlay District. (Variance request withdrawn by
applicants
5. A variance to exceed the required number of one (1)dune crossing for a site with
less than300 linear feet of frontage in Order to providetwo 21a.lu e crossi€1rs n
iheDune Preservation Overlay District.
6. A variance to reduce by 10'-8"the required setback of 20'-0"from the front oroperty
line in order to construct a guardhouse structure at 9'-4" from the west property
• line.
B. The applicant.has submitted plans and documents with the application that satisfy Article
1,Section 2 of the Related Special Acts,allowing the granting of a variance if the Board
finds that practical difficulties exist with respect to implementing the prmposed proieccat
the subject property.
The applicant has submittedpfansand documents with the application that-also indicate
the following,;as they relate to the requirements of Section 118-353(d.)AMiami Beach City
•
Page 467 of 1502
CFN: 20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3180
Page 8 of 11
H PB20-0441
Meeting Date: May 11, 2021
That special conditions andcircumstances exist which are peculiar to the land structure,
or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in
the same zoning district
hat thespecial conditions and circumstances do not result from the action of the
applicant,
That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant ani special privi€ege
that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning
district,
That literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms
of this Ordinance and would work unnecessary, nd undue hardship on the applicant;
That the.variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable
use of the land, building or structure.,
That the granting of the variance will be in harmony the general intent and purpose
of this Ordinance and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or
otherwise detrimental to the public-welfare. and
That the ranting of this request is consistent with the comprehensive plan and does not
reduce the levels of service as set forth in the plan.
C. The Board hereby grants the requested variance(s)#5 and#6. and imposes the following
condition based on Its authority in Section 118-354 of the Miami Beach City Code:
1. Substantial modifications to the plans submitted and approved as part of the
application, as determined by the Planning Director or designee, may require the
applicant to return to the Board for approval of the modified plans,even if the
modifications do not affect variances approved by the 3oard..
The decision of the Board regarding variances shall be final and there shall be no further
review thereof except by resort to a court of competent jurisdiction by petition for writ of
certiorari,
lll. General Terms and Conditions applying to both `l. Certificate of Appropriateness'and
`il. Variances'noted above.
A. This Fnal Order consolidates ail conditions and requirements for Certificate of
Appropriateness approval as same are contained herein, in the Orders dated November
14, 2014 (HPB 7490), March 8, 2016 (HPB 7490),and-January 12, 2021 (HPB20-0389),
and February 9. 2021 (HPB20-0430) and May 11, 2021 (HPB21-0451). Accordingly, this
Order shall serve as the Final Order for the proposed project In the event of a conflict
between the provisions hereof and those of the previous Orders, the provisions hereof
shall control.
f Page 468 of 1502 Y
CFN:20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3181
Page. 9 of 11
HP820.0441
Meeting Date: May 11, 2021
B. A Construction Parking and Traffic Management Plan (CP T MP) shall be approved by the
ParkingChapter 1 06 Article € Division 3 of the City Code, prior to
arki: e Director pursuant to C,. no;� .i A.�r,�,e .# f�iv.�.on ��
the issuance of a Budding Permit.
C. Where one or more parcels are unified for a single development, the property owner shall
execute and record a unity of title or a covenant in lieu of unity of title, as may be
applicable, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
D. Applicant agrees that in the event Code Comp is tce receives complaints of unreasonably
loud noise from mechanical and!or electrical equipment, and determines the complaints
to be valid, even if the equipment is operating pursuant to manufacturer specifications,the
applicant shall take such steps to mitigate the noise with noise attenuating materials as
reviewed and verified by an acoustic engineer: in a manner to be reviewed and approved
by staff consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria and/or the directions
from the Board.
F. A copy of all pages of the recorded Final Order shall be scanned into the plans submitted
for building permit and shall be located immediately after the front cover page of the permit
plans.
F. The Final Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, prior to
the issuance of a Building Permit.
G. Satisfaction of all conditions is required for the F:=anning Department to Give its approval
on a Certificate of Occupancy; a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or Partial Certificate
of Occupancy may also be conditionally granted Planning Departmental approval.
H. The Final Order is not severable, and if any provision or condition hereof is held void or
unconstitutional in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction, the order snail he
returned to the Board for reconsideration as to whether the order meets the criteria for
approval absent the stricken provision or condition, and/or it is appropriate to modify t►3e
remaining conditions or impose new conditions.
1. The conditions of approval herein are binding on the applicant, the property's owners,
operators, and ail successors in interest and assigns.
,J. Nothing in this order authorizes a violation of the City Code or other applicable law, nor
allows a relaxation of any requirement or standard set forth in the City Code.
K. All applicable FPL transformers or vault rooms and backflow prevention devices shall be
located within the budding envelope with the exception of the valve (Ply/) which may be
visible and accessible from the street.
L. Upon the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Completion, as
applicable, the project approved herein shall be maintained in accordance with the plans
approved by the board and shall be subject to all conditions of approval herein, unless
otherwise modified by the Board. Failure to maintain shall result in the issuance of a Code
Page 469 of 1502
CFN: 20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3182
Page 10 of 11
-IPB20 0441
Meeting Date: May 11, 2021
Compliance citation, and continued failure to comply may result in revocation of the
Certificate of Occupancy, Completion and Business Tax Receipt.
M. The applicant agrees and shall be required to provide access to areas subject to this
approval (not including private residences or hotel rooms) for inspection by the City (i.e.:
Planning, Code Compliance, Building Department, Fire Safety), to ensure compliance with
the plans approved by the Board and conditions of this order.
N The relocation of any tree shall be subject to the approval of the Environment &
Sustainability Director and/or Urban Forester, as applicable.
O. The applicant shall comply with the electric vehicle parking requirements, pursuant to Sec.
130-39 of the City Code, as applicable.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the evidence, information,
testimony and materials presented at the public hearing, which are part of the record for this
matter, and the staff report and analysis, which are adopted herein, including the staff
recommendations, which were amended and adopted by the Board, that the application is
GRANTED for the above-referenced project subject to those certain conditions specified in
Paragraph I, Il,ili of the Findings of Fact, to which the applicant has agreed.
PROVIDED. the applicant shall build substantially in accordance with the plans entitled "plans
entitled "Versailles' as prepared by Nichols Brosch Wurst Wolfe & Associates, Inc, dated
September 22, 2014, plans entitled 'Versailles' as prepared by Nichols Brosch Wurst Wolfe &
Associates, Inc, dated January 25, 2016, plans entitled "Amain Resort at the Historic Versailles
Hotel": as prepared by Revuelta architecture international, dated February 10,2020, plans entitled
"Amen Hotel & Residences as prepared by Revuelta Architecture International. dated January
12, 2021, ai-plans entitled "Amen Hotel & Residences", as prepared by Revuelta Architecture
International, dated February 0,2021,and plans entitled,Amen Hotel&Residences",as prepared
by Revuelta Architecture International, dated May 11. 2021, and plans entitled 'Anzac Hotel &
Residences', as prepared by Rovuelta Architecture international, dated May_ 11 ..:2021,, as
approved by the Historic Preservation Board, as determined by staff.
When requesting a building permit,the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit shah
be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions
set forth in this Order. No building permit may be issued unless and until all conditions of approval
that must be satisfied prior to permit issuance, as set forth in this Order, have been met.
The issuance of the approval does not relieve the applicant from obtaining all other required
Municipal, County andior State reviews and permits, including final zoning approval. If adequate
handicapped access is not provided on the Board-approved plans, this approval does not mean
that such handicapped access is not required. When requesting a building permit,
the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit shall be consistent with the plans
approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order:
If the Full Building Permit for the project is not issued within eighteen (18) months of the meeting
date at which the original approval was granted, the application will expire and become null and
void, unless the applicant makes an application to the Board for an extension of time, in
accordance with the requirements and procedures of Chapter 118 of the City Code; the granting
Page 470 of 1502
CFN:20210396741 BOOK 32546 PAGE 3183
Page 11 of 11
HPB20.0441
Meeting Date: May 11, 2021
of any such extension of time shall be at the discretion of the Board if the Full Building Permit
for the project should expire for any reason (including but not limited to construction not
commencing and continuing, with required inspections, in accordance with the applicabe Building
Code), the application will expire and become null and void,
In accordance with Chapter 118 of the City Code, the violation of any conditions and safeguards
that are a part of this Order shall be deemed a violation of the land development regulations of
the City Code, Faiiure to comply with this Order shall subject the application to Chapter 118 of
the City Code, for revocation or modification of the application.
Dated this �: day of a f° E ' , 20 .
t
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
THE CITY OEM ANI I BEACH, FLORIDA
DEBt1HAFt,a-ACKE i
HISTORIC PRESERVATION & ARCHITECTURE OFFICER
FOR THE CHAIR
STATE OF FLORIDA i
)SS
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ea' day of
ft,{ 20'14 by Deborah Tackett, Historic Preservation & Architecture
Officer, Planing Department, City of Miami Beach, Fonda,i a Florin • Municpal Corporation, on
behalf of the corporation. She is personally brio , to i. e. ;'
1
;_yc.MMssi: i#sal i2$1 ARY PUB C
j`� r<? x;< _S:ALK.i aa, .arm-Dade C,i unty_ Florida
1' .;.IP' e�;;: q ti t.ktA3tfunno I My commission expires. Art►t. . 3.2.024
Approved As To Form: /
City Attorney's Office: ( StAdifils 14 )
�s3 l 11
Filed with the Clerk of t o Hist . Preservation Board on F� 1 •� ( 5/25/21
v t,
e
Page 471 of 1502 .•,` :'f
aker man Akerman LLP
Three Brickell City Centre
98 Southeast Seventh Street
Suite 1100
Miami,FL 33131
Tel: 305.374.5600
Fax 305.374.5095
October 13, 2020
Thomas Mooney
Director of Planning
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Drive
Miami Beach, FL 33139
RE: HPB20-0430 — conditions related to COA for modifications to the previously
approved COA for a new design for the detached ground floor addition
Dear Mr. Mooney,
Our firm represents 3425 Collins, LLC ("Owner") the owner of the parcel of land located
at 3425 Collins Avenue (the "Property"), which is the subject of a pending land use board
application, HPB20-0430 (the "Pending Application"), currently scheduled for the December 8,
2020 agenda of the Historic Preservation Board ("HPB").
We agree to two conditions that could be placed into the Certificate of Appropriateness
("COA") for the Pending Application. The two conditions that we agree to include in the COA
are as follows:
1. Applicant shall pay for nine (9) injection wells at a total estimated value of $225,000,
in a continuous system with a total capacity of 18,000 GPM, which will provide water
quality treatment for 27 acres in the Indian Creek drainage basin. The City shall select
the sites for the injection wells and conduct all construction work.
2. Applicant shall donate to the City and pay for the repair and installation of the Jack
Stewart "Apollo" mural at a location of the City's choice. The obligation in this condition
shall expire five (5) years from the date of the issuance of the COA.
Please include this letter in the application files for the Pending Application.
Sincere) ,
Neisen O. asdin
55009745;2 Page 472 of 1502
PROPOSAL FOR PHASE I WORK
Jackson Stewart's Apollo Mural
Development of Scope
June 30, 2021
i
d
it t
ut -
i all
I iiii I Re�aim
i. Nes...,
sets •y.-
r
,.- -.. le \ \
.
,fir. -
Z
\ \ 1
Figure 1
Prepared for:
Josh Carden and Brandi Reddick ! Cultural Affairs/Art in Public Places Coordinator
Tourism and Culture Development
1755 Meridian Ave, Suite 500, 5th Floor
Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.673.7577 ext. 26127
joshuacarden@miamibeachfl.gov
BrandiReddick@miamibeachfl.gov
Prepared by:
RLA Conservation, Inc.
852 NW 71 S` Street
Miami, FL 33150
Page 473 of 1502
C f
Art re
INTRODUCTION:Jack Stewart's Apollo is a 90-foot-long mosaic mural was originally installed on
the historic Miami Beach Versailles Hotel. This artwork was removed upon the demolition of the
hotel and has remained in storage since 2014. It is currently in poor condition, exhibiting loss of
tesserae, damage to metal members and possible concrete cracking. That said, RLA Conservation,
the lead conservators for this project, believe this remains a conservable and exhibitable artwork.
This opinion is based on extensive work with relocating and repairing 20`h century mosaics in
Florida, California and Texas and publications referencing iconic projects.'
The luxury hotel group Aman has proposed funding and the conservation of and reinstallation of
the mosaic at the Scott Rakow Youth Center in Miami Beach as part of a development agreement
with the City of Miami Beach. This proposal provides an estimate for Phase I of this project, the
initial development of scope of work (SOW) including the participation of a structural engineer,
general contractor, and mosaic conservation specialist. This work, if accepted, is designed to be
phase I of a project and not intended to produce construction documents. Those will be part of the
second phase of work, which will be priced in conjunction with this phase. Moreover, it is
understood that the putting together the SOW, RLA et al will be allowed to continue to work on
this project if so desired by the Aman Group. In other words, acceptance of this proposal
acknowledges that RLA et al will be allowed to bid on and/or undertake the subsequent work to
save the mosaic.
PROPOSED WORK: RLA Conservation of Art + Architecture will provide overall management and
coordination of the SOW development with the participation of an engineer and contractor. The
proposed engineer is Douglas Wood of Douglas Wood Engineering. The contractor is Gal
Bensaadon of Red Door Construction. Both are respected Miami Dade County-based practitioners
with over 10 years of experience in similar work. Moreover, the three participants in this proposal
have worked together extensively on historic preservation projects. RLA will develop the scope for
all actual work required to perform the restoration of the mural. To develop a scope, the following
steps are proposed:
1. A site visit to the location of the mosaic mural with the engineer, contractor, and
conservator teams. RLA's team will include participation by both RLA President and Chief
Conservator Rosa Lowinger and Architectural Conservator Caroline Dickensheets. As part
of this site visit, RLA will undertake documentation of the mosaic with detailed photos and
provide a condition report on the current state of the mosaic. This will be used to inform
the SOW.
2. Visit to the proposed relocation site at the Scott Rakow Youth Center.
3. 1-2 phone call meetings, lasting no more than 1 hour each.
4. Initial investigation into engineering and contracting requirements.
See Lowinger, Rosa,Christina Varvi,and Kelly Ciociola(2020)Logistical Challenges in the Relocation of Monumental,
Modern Architectural Artworks, Studies in Conservation, 65:sup1, P192-P198, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2020.1780855
Page 1 2
Los Angeles Studio: 5418 Packard Street • Los Angeles, CA 90019
Miami Studio: 852 NW 71"t Street Miami, FL 33150
323.377.8425 • 305.573.7011
Page 474 of 1502 http://rlaconservation.com
C f
Art re
5. Preparation of a condition report by RLA.
6. Preparation of a Phased Scope of Work with calculated ballpark cost estimates for all
known aspects of the work, and caveats where unknowns are found.
7. A timeline for undertaking the work.
DELIVERABLES: RLA will compile the findings and provide the proposal outlining the proposed
scope of work, suggested project timeline, and specifications for conservation work, and
anticipated costs for all phases, including producing engineering drawings, developing methods of
attachment, determining whether the concrete bed needs to be repoured, and other aspects of the
actual work.
COST ESTIMATES FOR PHASE I:
Engineer: $800.00- $1,200.00
Contractor: $700.00- $1,000.00
Conservator: $2,500.00
Total Estimated Cost of this Phase: Not to exceed $3,700.00
Thank you for the opportunity to care for your collection. Please do not hesitate to contact us with
any further questions.
Proposal Prepared by: Proposal Reviewed, Edited, and Approved by:
//12 CD -
Caroline Dickensheets, Architectural Conservator Rosa Lowinger, President & Chief Conservator
PLEASE NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF RLA CONSERVATION OF ART&ARCHITECTURE AND MAY NOT BE
SHARED WITH ANY OTHER PARTIES OR INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RLA CONSERVATION OF ART&
ARCHITECTURE OR USED TO CREATE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)TO SOLICIT WORK FROM ANOTHER CONSERVATION FIRM.
Accepted by:
(sign & print name) Date
Page 1 3
Los Angeles Studio: 5418 Packard Street • Los Angeles, CA 90019
Miami Studio: 852 NW 71' Street • Miami, FL 33150
323.377.8425 • 305.573.7011
Page 475 of 1502 http://rlaconservation.com
PROPOSAL FOR PHASE II WORK
Jackson Stewart's Apollo Mural
Conservation of the Mosaic
Revised 2.2.2022
r r` at
t =7y r....
ev
tti
i 1 ---- - .
TI J
N. •
-- � ., t
t
\ 1
Figure 1
Prepared for:
Josh Carden and Brandi Reddick I Cultural Affairs/Art in Public Places Coordinator
Tourism and Culture Development
1755 Meridian Ave,Suite 500, 5th Floor
Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.673.7577 ext. 26127 joshuacarden@miamibeachfl.gov BrandiReddick@miamibeachfl.gov
Prepared by:
RLA Conservation, Inc.
852 NW 71St Street
Miami, FL 33150
Page 476 of 1502
71.
C• cf
Art , .. r.. re
INTRODUCTION:Jack Stewart's Apollo is a 90-foot-long mosaic mural originally installed on the historic
Miami Beach Versailles Hotel. This artwork was removed upon the demolition of the hotel and has
remained in storage since 2014. It is currently in poor condition, exhibiting loss of tesserae, damage to
metal members and possible concrete cracking. That said, RLA Conservation, the lead conservators for
this project, believe this remains a conservable and exhibitable artwork. This opinion is based on
extensive work with relocating and repairing 20th century mosaics in Florida, California and Texas and
publications referencing iconic projects.'
The luxury hotel group Aman has proposed funding and the conservation of and reinstallation of the
mosaic at the Scott Rakow Youth Center in Miami Beach as part of a development agreement with the
City of Miami Beach.This proposal provides an estimate for Phase 11 of this project, the initial
conservation of the mosaic's elements, an inventory of all items, and moving them to a more
appropriate storage place until such time as a proper installation site can be determined.
BACKGROUND: RLA Conservation's conservators Rosa Lowinger and Caroline Dickensheets performed an
assessment of the mosaic on July 22, 2021. A second assessment, conducted by Dickensheets in
conjunction with engineer Douglas Wood and Gal Bensaadon of Red Door Construction was carried out
on August 6, 2021. At the time of the second assessment, it became clear that the wall selected for
installation at the Scott Rakow Youth Center in Miami Beach was not big enough to accommodate the
mosaic. Therefore, new thoughts on how to proceed with conservation are being currently considered.
At the time of the onsite inspections,the mosaic was found to be in very poor condition at the site.The
pieces are fracturing, tesserae have been lost, aluminum elements have been bent and exhibit
corrosion,and there is general dirt,grime,and biogrowth on elements.That said, the mosaic remains a
viable artwork that is fully conservable.Time, however, is of the essence. The elements need to be
rescued, cleaned and prepared for conservation sooner rather than later or risk additional losses that
will result in increased treatment costs and possible irreparable damage.
The new plan of action put forth below addresses the conservation of the artwork's elements
themselves.This is a necessary step in preparation for installation. In other words, doing this step will
not result in redundancy. This work needs to happen to mitigate the poor removal and storage phases
that have taken place so far.
PROPOSED WORK FOR PHASE II:Phase II will address the repair and inventory of the mosaic.This version of
the proposal is updated to include moving of the mosaic to the Bakehouse site or another site nearby.
The following is proposed:
1. Assess and inventory all of the elements. Use a diagram of the installed artwork to try to piece
together where everything goes.Assign a number to each item.
See Lowinger,Rosa,Christina Varvi,and Kelly Ciociola(2020)Logistical Challenges in the Relocation of Monumental,Modern
Architectural Artworks,Studies in Conservation,65:sup1,P192-P198, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2020.1780855
Page 2
_os Angeles Studio: 5418 Packard Street • Los Angeles, CA 90019
Miami Studio: 852 NW 71- Street • Miami, FL 33150
323.377.8425 • 305.573.7C:1
Page 477 of 1502 http://rlaconservation.com
C• --_ of
Art re
2. Photograph each element and sort the pieces so mosaics and aluminum pieces are separated
and carefully catalogued. Determine if any items are missing.
3. Remove weeds and spray for wasps then gather all tesserae for re-use.
4. As the work is no longer able to be worked on at the site in question, devise a plan,together
with an art handling firm, for safe transfer of the artwork to a new location. At present the
Bakehouse at NW 32ntl Street near 5th Avenue is offered. This site will require placing the
elements on concrete blocks to prevent flooding of the mural. We will require fencing and a job
box to safeguard tools and materials.
5. Set up a platform for work on the mosaics and aluminum elements. Using a forklift, move the
mosaic elements so they are able to be worked on.
6. Clean all of the elements using a conservation grade detergent, low pressure water, and
fungicides to remove biogrowths.
7. Reset loose tesserae and source new tesserae to replace missing ones.
8. Perform preliminary repairs to the concrete in preparation for being able to turn the mosaics.
9. Using a forklift, move and turn the mosaics for work on the backs.
10. Remove corrosion from all aluminum elements.
11. Straighten bent aluminum elements and repair connectors.
12. Identify any elements that are missing and provide any additional costs and strategy for their
replacement or refabrication. This to include hardware, mosaic elements, and aluminum
fragments.The costs of these will be added to the base cost, an allowance is given below.
13. Once elements are conserved, safeguard them in a covered area until they can be installed.The
cost of this will need to be calculated separately once we know where the items are going and
who will move them.
14. Prepare conservation notes for installation.
15. Meet with possible installers and engineering and hopefully help identify the wall where the
pieces will be mounted.
PROPOSED RLA COSTS OF PHASE II:
These costs are being revised to account for moving the artwork to a new site at the Bakehouse and
working from the RLA studios than at the original site. Costs are based on the following rates: Chief
Conservator-$200.00 per hour; Staff Conservators-$165.00 per hour;Technicians: $95.00- $110.00 per
hour;Admin- $65.00 per hour. Note that the revised cost includes the conservation time and labor to
assist with the move to a new site. The cost of the move itself will be calculated separately after
receiving estimates from qualified art handling firms. We are allowing a contingency for this.
• Labor:
Conservators: $50,000.00-$65,000.00
Technicians: $120,000.00-$150,000.00
Page 1 3
cos Angeles Studio: 5418 Packard Street • Los Angeles, CA 90019
Miami Studio: 352 `:A 71— Street • Miami, FL 33150
323.377.8425 • 305.573.7011
Page 478 of 1502 http://rlaconservation.com
C. •f
Art . re
Admin/ Insurance: $3,000.00-$4,000.00(note: This is only for RLA's liability and
workman's compensation plus naming Bakehouse as co-insured. The artwork itself will need to be
insured by the City for theft or damage .)
• Materials: $5,000.00+ replacement parts (allowance for replacements$5,000.00)
• Equipment(forklift rental,tables, lighting, welding, and rental of fencing for 12 months): allow
$10,000.00-$15,000.00.
This cost assumes that water and electricity will be available at no charge at the Bakehouse
worksite.
• Documentation, report, research,supervision of move, meetings: $6,000.00
Total Estimated Conservation Cost of Phase II Treatment: $199,000.00- $250,000.00
Additional Costs(not to RLA):
1. For moving the artwork to the Bakehouse will need to be calculated, but we are including an
allowance of$25,000.00.To be revised as needed.
2. Final installation range between $70,000.00-$90,000.00 depending on the location selected
and the engineering requirements, including whether the wall itself needs engineering. This will
require revision.
Proposal Revised by: l r
/ram' //, l •
Caroline Dickensheets, Conservator Rosa Lowinger, President & Chief Conservator
PLEASE NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF RLA CONSERVATION OF ART&ARCHITECTURE AND
MAY NOT BE SHARED WITH ANY OTHER PARTIES OR INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RLA
CONSERVATION OF ART&ARCHITECTURE OR USED TO CREATE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL(RFP)TO SOLICIT WORK FROM
ANOTHER CONSERVATION FIRM.
Page i 4
Los Angeles Studio: 5418 Packard Street • Los Angeles, CA 90319
Miami Studio: 852 NW 71" Street • Miami, FL 33150
323.377.8425 • 305.573.7011
Page 479 of 1502 http://rlaconservation.com
!
, 1
, -,---..„--;-„,:.----
r. 11 it°
. . r
. _
.=_„._....„-
Illtp,",„t
, i.,
v,
_. .
, ' •t 111 .
1111
11 1
---.. .,f.,....
4
4 f •
... •
ant
•1.
' 1
imirm...0
•,4
.',..:
..:,.
1...
-,...17.,
(IIIIIIt Ili' I
I
IIIIIIrk
(
10
:._-,.. . .
.....:,=s'
, .
. ,
i
1
' .
_ ..
11....
.•
... ,e:71---
-
1 1
-;.,-_
.,:*._-,_
&•'-
-
9
9
9
,....::......-::',..,.- _
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
6
t 6
il.ff
I
'
- = --. -.:T -
••1
-,,„ :,. •
/,
I,
:-----",-- '.
/
I..._