Loading...
2004-25490 Reso RESOLUTION NO. 2004-25490 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, REJECTING ALL PROPOSALS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 16-02/03 FOR THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE SOUTH POINTE PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, on November 8, 1994, the citizens of the City of Miami Beach approved the issuance of $15 million in general obligation bonds for park improvements (Parks Bond); and WHEREAS, the City's consultant, Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. (B&A), prepared a Master Plan that addressed the needs of twenty (20) City parks of various sizes, as well as improvements for the boardwalk and bike paths; the City Mayor and City Commission adopted the Master Plan on June 19, 1996; and WHEREAS, B&A completed substantial planning efforts, but work on design and construction documents never began; and WHEREAS, at that time, City staff and B&A agreed to terminate the firm's services with regard to South Pointe Park; and WHEREAS, once B&A's services had been terminated for South Pointe Park, there was a need to issue a Request for Qualifications for Professional Services, including architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, and construction administration services, to complete the planning, construction design, and construction of improvements to South Pointe Park and on November 13, 2002, the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 16-02/03 for the aforestated services (the RFQ); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was issued by the City's Procurement Division on December 12,2002; the deadline for RFQ submittals was January 31,2003, and 11 proposals were received from consultants; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2003, the City Manager issued LTC No. 24- 2003, which appointed the Evaluation Committee for this RFQ; the Committee convened on March 3, 2003 to evaluate proposals, and if needed, shortlist firms; and WHEREAS, at approximately the same time that the Committee met, the City began considering options for settling land use and zoning legal conflicts in South Pointe (the South Pointe Settlement); and WHEREAS, for this reason, the City delayed the second meeting of the Evaluation Committee, with the intent of finalizing the South Pointe Settlement before selecting a design firm; it was the City's expectation that this settlement would be reached in several months; and WHEREAS, on March 14, 2003, all firms that submitted proposals were sent a letter informing them that the evaluation process for the RFQ had been postponed until further notice; and WHEREAS, due to this indefinite postponement, on May 6, 2003, the City requested a ninety (90) day extension of the proposals submitted pursuant to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, efforts to complete the South Pointe Settlement continued over the Summer and into the Fall of 2003, but no conclusion was reached; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 2003, the City requested and received an additional ninety (90) day time extension from proposers who responded to the RFQ; and WHEREAS, at this time, the City has not concluded the South Pointe Settlement, and the City needs to resolve these issues before moving forward with the selection of an AlE firm to design the South Pointe Park Improvements; and WHEREAS, as the conclusion of the South Pointe Settlement may take several more months, or longer, the proposers that responded to the RFQ cannot hold guarantee the terms of their proposals indefinitely. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission herein accept the recommendation of the City Manager to reject all proposals received in response to Request for Qualifications No. 16-02/03 for the Planning, Design, and Construction Administration Services needed to Complete the S th Pointe Park Improvement Project. ATTEST: ~6 r{lL~ CITY CLERK T:\AGENDA\2004\Feb2504\Consent\RFQ rejection RESO.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION <- 2,-/7--01 A - CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY lD ....... Condensed Title: Request to Reject all Proposals Received in Reference to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 16-02103 for the Services Needed to Complete the South Pointe Park Improvement Project. Issue: I Shall the Commission reject RFQ proposals submitted for RFQ No. 16-02/03 Item Summary/Recommendation: On November 13, 2002, the City Commission approved a Commission Memo authorizing the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 16-02/03 for the Planning, Design, and Construction Administration Services needed to complete the South Pointe Park Improvement Project. On January 27,2003, the Office of the City Manager issued LTC No. 24-2003 which appointed the Evaluation Committee for this RFQ. The Committee convened on March 3, 2003 to evaluate proposals, and if needed, shortlist firms. Consensus from the Evaluation Committee was to shortlist the firms to 5 out of the 11 that submitted proposals. At approximately the same time that the Committee met, the City began considering options for settling land use and zoning legal conflicts in South Pointe. Some of the options considered would involve the City receiving title to additional land adjacent to South Pointe Park. If the City did receive this land, it would be in the City's best interest to add the land to South Pointe Park and have the same firm that is chosen to design South Pointe Park Improvements to design improvements to the added land. For this reason, the City delayed the second meeting of the Selection Committee with the intent of completing the South Pointe legal settlement before selecting a design firm. It was the City's expectation that this settlement would be reached in several months. On March 14, 2003, all firms that submitted proposals were sent a letter informing them that the evaluation process for RFQ 16-01/02 had been postponed until further notice. Due to this indefinite postponement, on May 6, 2003 the City requested a 90 day extension of the RFQ validation from all proposers. Efforts to complete the South Pointe settlement continued over the Summer and into the Fall of 2003, but no conclusion was reached. On October 12, 2003, the City requested an additional 90 day time extension of the RFQ, and all proposers agreed to extend the RFQ submittal for an additional 90 days. At this time, the City has still not reached a settlement on the South Pointe land use and zoning conflicts. The City needs to resolve this issue before moving forward with the selection of an AE firm to design South Pointe Park Improvements. This resolution may take several more months or longer, and the firms that responded to the RFQ cannot hold their proposals valid indefinitely. Therefore, the Administration recommends that all RFQ proposals for RFQ 16-01/02 be rejected, and a new RFQ to be re-issued after the City has determined whether or not additional land will be added to South Pointe Park. REJECT ALL RFQ PROPOSALS Advisory Board Recommendation: I Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Approved Funds: 1 D 2 Finance Dept. Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin Tim Hemstreet, CIP Director Manager City Manager GL "'Vii ,....L J.- ~"v"I/..-J AGENDA ITEM DATE C7D ;'-J,5 -cJ-'f CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 www.ci.miami-beach.fl.us COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: From: Mayor David Dermer and Members of the City Commission Jorge M. Gonzalez 1v-~' City Manager O. t1 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, REJECTING ALL PROPOSALS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 16-02/03 FOR THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE SOUTH POINTE PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Date: February 25, 2004 Subject: ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS: On November 8, 1994, the citizens of the City of Miami Beach approved the issuance of $15 million in general obligation bonds for park improvements (Parks Bond). Bermello, Ajamil and Partners, Inc. (B&A) prepared a Master Plan that addressed the needs of twenty (20) parks of various sizes, and improvements for the Boardwalk and bikeways. The Mayor and City Commission adopted the Master Plan on June 19, 1996. B&A completed substantial planning efforts but work on design and construction documents never began. At that specific time, City staff and B&A have agreed to terminate the firm's services in regard to South Pointe Park. This action was undertaken through a separate Commission resolution which also provides a detailed history of all the actions that have affected the work on this design contract and addresses substantial additional changes to the B&A contract. Once B&A's services had been terminated for South Pointe Park, there was a need to issue a Request for Qualifications for Professional Services including architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, and construction administration services to complete the planning, construction design, and construction of improvements to South Pointe Park. Approximately $5.2 million is allocated for the project. On November 13, 2002, the City Commission approved a Commission Memo authorizing the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 16-02/03 for the Planning, Design, and Construction Administration Services needed to complete the South Pointe Park Improvement Project. RFQ No. 16-01/02 Page Two February 25, 2004 The RFQ was issued by the City's Procurement Division on December 12, 2002. The deadline for RFQ submittals was January 31,2003, and 11 proposals were received from Consultants. On January 27, 2003, the Office of the City Manager issued LTC No. 24-2003 which appointed the Evaluation Committee for this RFQ. The Committee convened on March 3, 2003 to evaluate proposals, and if needed, shortlist firms. Consensus from the Evaluation Committee was to shortlist the firms to 5 out of the 11 that submitted proposals. At approximately the same time that the Committee met, the City began considering options for settling land use and zoning legal conflicts in South Pointe. Some of the options considered would involve the City receiving title to additional land adjacent to South Pointe Park. If the City did receive this land, it would be in the City's best interest to add the land to South Pointe Park and have the same firm that is chosen to design South Pointe Park Improvements to design improvements to the added land. For this reason, the City delayed the second meeting of the Selection Committee with the intent of completing the South Pointe legal settlement before selecting a design firm. It was the City's expectation that this settlement would be reached in several months. On March 14, 2003, all firms that submitted proposals were sent a letter informing them that the evaluation process for RFQ 16-01/02 had been postponed until further notice. Due to this indefinite postponement, on May 6, 2003 the City requested a 90 day extension of the RFQ validation from all proposers. Efforts to complete the South Pointe settlement continued over the Summer and into the Fall of 2003, but no conclusion was reached. On October 12, 2003, the City requested an additional 90 day time extension of the RFQ, and all proposers agreed to extend the RFQ submittal for an additional 90 days. CONCLUSION At this time, the City has still not reached a settlement on the South Pointe land use and zoning conflicts. The City needs to resolve this issue before moving forward with the selection of an AE firm to design South Pointe Park Improvements. This resolution may take several more months or longer, and the firms that responded to the RFQ cannot hold their proposals valid indefinitely. Therefore, the Administration recommends that all RFQ proposals for RFQ 16-01/02 be rejected, and a new RFQ to be re-issued after the City has determined whether or not additional land will be added to South Pointe Park. T:\AGENDA\2004\Feb2504\ConsentlRFQ16rejectionMemo.doc