2004-3439 Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-3439
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS OF THE MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE; AMENDING CHAPTER
142, "ZONING DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS"; AMENDING SECTION 142-
1161, "HEIGHT REGULATION EXCEPTIONS"; AMENDING SECTION 142-
1161(0). "ROOFTOP ADDITIONS" BY MODIFYING THE PROHIBITION OF
ROOFTOP ADDITIONS OF MORE THAN ONE STORY IN THE NORTH BEACH
RESORT HISTORIC DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, REPEALER.
SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board and the Planning Board of the City of
Miami Beach, Florida, have recommended approval of the North Beach Resort Historic
District in that general area of Collins Avenue between the 6000 block of Collins Avenue
and 71"' Street, and the City Commission is currently considering the historic designation
of said district; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission deem that it is in the best interest of
historic preservation within Miami Beach to amend the Land Development Regulations of
the City Code to address concerns related to future rooftop additions in the North Beach
Resort Historic District;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT DULY ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 142-1161 OF THE CITY CODE.
That Chapter 142, Section 142-1161 entitled "Height Regulation Exceptions" of the
Land Development Regulations of the City Code of Miami Beach, Florida, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
*
*
*
(d) Rooftop additions.
(1) Restrictions. There shall be no rooftop additions to existing structures in the
following areas: oceanfront lots within the Miami Beach Architectural District in
the RM-3 or CD-3 zoning districts; non-oceanfront lots fronting Ocean Drive in
the MXE zoning district. No variance from this provision shall be granted.
(2) Additional regulations. Existing structures within an historic district shall only be
permitted to have habitable one-story rooftop additions (whether attached or
detached), with a maximum floor to ceiling height of 12 feet. except as
hereinafter provided. No variance from this provision shall be granted. The
additions shall not be visible when viewed at eye level (5'--6" from grade) from
1
the opposite side of the adjacent right-of-way; for corner properties, said
additions shall also not be visible when viewed at eye level from the diagonal
corner at the opposite side of the right-of-way and from the opposite side of the
side street right-of-way. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the line-of-sight
requirement may be modified as deemed appropriate by the historic preservation
board based upon the following criteria: (i) the addition enhances the
architectural contextual balance of the surrounding area; (ii) the addition is
appropriate to the scale and architecture of the existing building; (iii) the addition
maintains the architectural character of the existing building in an appropriate
manner; and (iv) the addition minimizes the impact of existing mechanical
equipment or other rooftop elements. The placement and manner of attachment
of additions (including those which are adjacent to existing structures) are subject
to historic preservation board approval.
(3) Collins Waterfront Historic District. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of
subsection 142-1161 (d)(2), certain types of existing structures located within the
Collins Waterfront Historic District may be permitted to have habitable rooftop
additions (whether attached or detached) according to the following
requirements:
a. Height of rooftop additions permitted for structures of five stories or less:
1. Existing buildings of five or less stories may not have more than a
one story rooftop addition, in accordance with the provisions of
subsection 142-1161(d)(2).
b. Height of rooftop additions permitted for hotel structures of greater than
five stories:
1. For those structures determined to be eligible by the historic
preservation board for rooftop additions of greater than one story
in height according to the provisions of subsection &.- @ below,
one story is allowed per every three stories of the existing building
on which the addition is to be placed, to a maximum of four
additional roof-top addition stories, with a maximum floor to floor
height of 12 feet, and a maximum floor to roof deck height of 12
feet at the highest new story. The additional stories shall only be
placed on the underlying structure creating the eligibility for an
addition.
2. Rooftop additions permitted under this subsection, which are
greater than one story, shall be for the sole purpose of hotel
development. A restrictive covenant in a form acceptable to the
city attorney committing the property to such hotel use, subject to
release by the historic preservation board when such board
determines that the restriction is no longer necessary, shall be
recorded prior to the issuance of any building permit for a roof-top
addition greater than one story.
ffi North Beach Resort Historic District. Notwithstandina the foreaoina provisions of
Section 142-1161 (d)(2), existina structures located within the North Beach
2
Resort Historic District may be permitted to have habitable rooftop additions
(whether attached or detached) accordino to the followino re~uirements:
a. Existino buildinos of five (5) or less stories may not have more than a one
storv rooftop addition. in accordance with the provisions of subsection
142-1161 (d)(2).
b. For those structures determined to be elioible bv the historic preservation
board for rooftop additions of oreater than one storv in heioht. accordino
to the provisions of subsection (5) below. existino buildinos of six (6) or
more stories may have a two (2) storv rooftop addition with a maximum
floor to floor heioht of 12 feet. and a maximum floor to roof deck heioht of
12 feet at the hiohest new storv. The additional stories shall on Iv be
placed on that portion of the underlvino structure creatino the elioibilitv for
an addition.
(5) &.- Design and appropriateness guidelines. In determining if existing structures are
eligible for rooftop additions, the historic preservation board, in addition to any
and all other applicable criteria and guidelines contained in these Land
Development Regulations, shall consider whether:
a. .:k The design of an existing structure (or part thereof) to which a new
rooftop addition is to be attached is of such nature or style that it does not
contain any significant original architectural crown element(s) or other
designed composition of significant architectural features, nor does the
overall profile of the structure including its rooftop design features have a
distinctive quality that contributes to the special character of the historic
district, as determined by the historic preservation board. Significant
rooftop or upper facade elements or features may include but shall not be
limited to towers, domes, crowns, ziggurats, masts, crests, cornices,
friezes, finials, clocks, lanterns, original signage and other original
architectural features as may be discovered.
b. 2.- The proposed rooftop addition shall be designed, placed and attached to
an existing structure in a manner that:
.L h Does not obscure, detract from, or otherwise adversely impact
upon other significant architectural features of the existing structure,
inclusive of significant features that are to be, or should be, restored or
reconstructed in the future;
2. ih Maintains the architectural contextual balance of the surrounding
area and does not adversely impact upon or detract from the surrounding
historic district;
3 ...
-,-1Ih-
Is appropriate to the scale and architecture of the existing building;
4.iv,
Maintains the architectural character of the existing building in an
appropriate manner;
3
5. >,f; Does not require major demolition and alterations to existing
structural systems in such manner as would compromise the
architectural character and integrity of the existing structure; and
6. vh- Minimizes the impact of existing mechanical equipment or other
rooftop elements.
c. G. The placement and manner of attachment of additions (including those
which are adjacent to existing structures) are subject to the historic
preservation board granting a Certificate of Appropriateness for any
demolition that may be required as well as for the new construction.
d. e-, The entire structure shall be substantially rehabilitated, in aGGordanoo
'.\lith tho Socretary of tho Intorior Standards.
e. f,. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the overall height of any structure located
in the Collins Waterfront Historic District or the North Beach Resort
Historic District may not exceed the height limitations of the underlying
zoning district. No additional stories may be added under this section
through height variances from the underlying zoning district regulations.
t ~ No variance from this provision shall be granted.
SECTION 2. REPEALER.
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are
hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the
remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity.
SECTION 4. CODIFICATION.
It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission, and it is hereby ordained that
the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the land Development
Regulations of the City Code of Miami Beach, Florida. The sections of this Ordinance may
be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention, and the word "Ordinance" may
be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word.
4
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect ten days following adoption.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of
ATTEST:
~(J~
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION:
~fII-
:z -7-011
DATE
First Reading: February 25, 2004
Second Reading: March 17, 2004
(Ordinance No. 20 -3439)
Verified By:
Underscore denotes new language.
Striko thro\;l€lh denotes deleted language.
T: lAG EN DA 12004 1M a, 1 704 IRegula,lN BR H Drooftopord. 2nd Rdg. doc
5
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
m
Condensed Title:
Second Reading Public Hearing - Proposed Amending Ordinance for Rooftop Additions in the North Beach
Resort Historic District.
Issue:
The Administration is requesting that the Mayor and City Commission consider the proposed amending
ordinance for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District.
Item Summa IRecommendation:
Adopt the proposed amending ordinance on second reading public hearing by approving the companion
ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District (as adopted on first
readin b the Cit Commission on Februa 25, 2004 .
Advisory Board Recommendation:
On December 9, 2003, the Historic Preservation Board approved a motion (6 to 0; 1 absence) to
recommend approval of the proposed amending ordinance for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort
Historic District. This ordinance amendment would allow certain existing buildings of six or more stories to
have a two story rooftop addition with a maximum floor to floor height of 12 feet and a maximum floor to
roof deck height of 12 feet at the highest new story.
On January 27,2004, the Planning Board approved a motion (5 to 1; 1 absence) to recommend approval of
the proposed amending ordinance for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District with
modifications. This ordinance amendment would allow certain existing buildings six or more stories in
height to have a one story rooftop addition with a maximum floor to ceiling height of 16 feet.
On February 25, 2004, the Mayor and City Commission approved (6 to 0; 1 absence) the companion
ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District, as recommended bv
the Historic Preservation Board, on first reading and scheduled a second reading public hearing for March
17,2004.
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1
D 2
3
4
Finance Dept. Total
Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin :
William H. Cary, Assistant Planning Director; Shannon M. Anderton, Senior Planner
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM f(2)C:
DATE 3-/7-0((
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
From:
Mayor David Dermer and Date: March 17,2004
Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez ~ ~/
City Manager U SECOND READING PUBLIC HEARING
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS OF THE MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE; AMENDING CHAPTER 142,
"ZONING DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS"; AMENDING SECTION 142-1161,
"HEIGHT REGULATION EXCEPTIONS"; AMENDING SECTION 142-1161(D),
"ROOFTOP ADDITIONS" BY MODIFYING THE PROHIBITION OF ROOFTOP
ADDITIONS OF MORE THAN ONE STORY IN THE NORTH BEACH RESORT
HISTORIC DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, REPEALER,
SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
To:
Subject:
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the proposed
amending ordinance on second reading public hearing by approving the companion ordinance
amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District (as adopted on first
reading by the City Commission on February 25,2004).
BACKGROUND
On August 12, 2003, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed a proposal for the designation of the
North Beach Resort Historic District, which would create an historic district along the Collins Avenue
corridor (roughly from the 6000 block of Collins Avenue to the centerline of 71 st Street). During the
discussion on the issue, the Historic Preservation Board expressed its agreement that significant
flexibility be retained in the development regulations for the proposed district in order to permit the
type of quality redevelopment necessary to stimulate the economic growth of the area.
One area identified for possible action was the existing rooftop addition regulations in historic
districts. The existing regulations would only permit a one story rooftop addition with a maximum
floor to ceiling height of 12 feet in the proposed North Beach Resort Historic District. The Board
noted that historic districts within the City could vary as to the essential character and building
typology present, therefore necessitating flexibility in the development regulations for different
districts. The Board further noted that when the Collins Waterfront Historic District was adopted by
the City Commission on January 31,2001, the Commission also adopted a companion ordinance
amendment to enable existing buildings within the district to have a rooftop addition of greater than
one story in height based upon the height, configuration, and design of the existing building.
On August 12, 2003, the Historic Preservation Board approved the preparation of a companion
ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the proposed North Beach Resort Historic District for
presentation to the Planning Board and City Commission along with the Designation Report. The
Planning Department prepared the proposed ordinance and presented it to the Historic
Commission Memorandum of March 17, 2004
Second Reading Public Hearing - Rooftop Additions in the Proposed North Beach Resort Historic District
Page 20f5
Preservation Board for discussion purposes on November 12, 2003. The Board expressed no
concerns.
On December 9,2003, the Historic Preservation Board approved a motion (6 to 0; 1 absence) to
recommend approval of the companion ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North
Beach Resort Historic District. The proposed ordinance amendment, as recommended by the
Historic Preservation Board. would modify the restrictions on rooftop additions to allow certain
existing buildings of six or more stories to have a two story rooftop addition with a maximum floor to
floor height of 12 feet, and a maximum floor to roof deck height of 12 feet at the highest new story.
The additional stories may only be placed on that portion of the underlying structure creating the
eligibility for an addition. Existing buildings of five stories or less may not have more than a one
story rooftop addition.
On December 2, 2003, the Planning Board continued the proposed rooftop addition companion
ordinance for the North Beach Resort Historic District to the January 27,2004, meeting due to the
loss of a quorum.
On January 27, 2004, the Planning Board approved a motion (5 to 1; 1 absence) to recommend
approval of the companion ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort
Historic District with modifications. The proposed ordinance amendment, as recommended by the
Plannina Board, would modify the restrictions on rooftop additions to allow certain existing buildings
of six or more stories in height to have a one story rooftop addition with a maximum floor to ceiling
height of 16 feet. The rooftop addition may be placed in its entirety only atop the portion of the
structure that is six stories or greater.
On February 25, 2004, the Mayor and City Commission approved (6 to 0; 1 absence) the
companion ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District,
as recommended by the Historic Preservation Board, on first reading and scheduled a second
reading public hearing for March 17,2004.
ANALYSIS OF THE AMENDING ORDINANCE
In reviewing a request for an amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code or
a change in land use, the Planning Board shall consider the following:
1. Whether the proposed change is consistent and compatible with the comprehensive plan and
any applicable neighborhood or redevelopment plans.
Consistent - The proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan, and it
would be consistent with the designation of the area as the North Beach Resort Historic District.
2. Whether the proposed change would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent or nearby
districts.
Not applicable
3. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
Consistent - The proposed ordinance seeks to allow development that is more in keeping with
the existing neighborhood character of the proposed North Beach Resort Historic District along
the east side of Collins Avenue. It should be noted that any new development under the
Commission Memorandum of March 17, 2004
Second Reading Public Hearing - Rooftop Additions in the Proposed North Beach Resort Historic District
Page 3 of 5
provisions of this ordinance is subject to the approval of the Historic Preservation Board.
Rooftop additions may not be permitted if they would negatively impact the design of an existing
structure and its significant architectural features or detract from the special character of the
surrounding historic district.
4. Whether the proposed change would tax the existing load on public facilities and infrastructure.
Consistent - The proposed change could slightly increase the allowable development in the
area of the proposed historic district; however, the amount of new development that would be
permitted under the provisions of the proposed ordinance is nominal.
5. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the
property proposed for change.
Not applicable
6. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change
necessary.
Consistent - Currently, rooftop additions in the area of the proposed historic district are
regulated solely by the development regulations for the applicable zoning district. If the
proposed historic designation is adopted, additional regulations applicable only to historic
districts will apply. The proposed change designating this area as an historic district makes
passage of this ordinance important in order to provide the necessary flexibility to the Historic
Preservation Board to review proposed new developments.
7. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood.
Consistent - The proposed amendment should not adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
8. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion beyond the
levels of service as set forth in the comprehensive plan or otherwise affect public safety.
Consistent - The proposed change could have a very minor impact upon traffic circulation
which may affect levels of service (LOS); however, as stated above, any development project
proposed for construction which involves a rooftop addition as envisioned under this provision
will be required to mitigate these impacts within the context of the City's Concurrency
Management System.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
Consistent - The proposed change may slightly reduce access to light and air if development
projects are undertaken utilizing this provision. However, as noted above, the ordinance
requires careful Historic Preservation Board review of any proposed rooftop additions under this
provision, which should protect against significant reduction of light and air corridors.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Commission Memorandum of March 17, 2004
Second Reading Public Hearing - Rooftop Additions in the Proposed North Beach Resort Historic District
Page 4 of 5
Consistent - Staff is of the opinion that property values in the subject area would actually be
favorably affected by the proposed amendment because it provides the ability to add a
reasonable amount of additional space to certain existing buildings.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Consistent - The proposed amendment will provide additional flexibility and help to facilitate
development throughout the proposed North Beach Resort Historic District.
12. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with
existing zoning.
Not Applicable
13. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the city for the proposed use in a district
already permitting such use.
Not Applicable
STAFF ANALYSIS
Currently, the Land Development Regulations of the City Code restrict rooftop additions to one story
with a maximum floor to ceiling height of 12 feet in all of the City's historic districts except for the
Collins Waterfront Historic District. The proposed ordinance amendment, as recommended by the
Historic Preservation Board, would permit rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic
District of up to two stories based upon the following formula. Existing buildings of five (5) or less
stories may not have more than a one story rooftop addition. For those structures determined to be
eligible by the Historic Preservation Board for rooftop additions greater than one story in height (see
Design and Appropriateness Guidelines in the new Section 142-1161 (d)(5) in the attached
proposed amending ordinance), certain existing buildings of six or more stories may have a two
story rooftop addition with a maximum floor to floor height of 12 feet, and a maximum floor to roof
deck height of 12 feet at the highest new story. The additional stories may only be placed on that
portion of the underlying structure creating the eligibility for an addition. The proposed ordinance
amendment would provide a suitable level of flexibility to renovate and adapt certain existing
buildings in the district to better meet current operation, social, and economic needs.
The Planning Board recommended approval of the companion ordinance amendment for rooftop
additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District with modifications at its January 27, 2004,
meeting. The proposed ordinance amendment, as recommended by the Plannina Board, would
modify the restrictions on rooftop additions to allow certain existing buildings of six or more stories
in height to have a one story rooftop addition with a maximum floor to ceiling height of 16 feet
(rather than the currently permitted one story rooftop additions with a maximum floor to ceiling
height of 12 feet). The rooftop addition may be placed in its entirety only atop the portion of the
structure that is six stories or greater. The Administration believes that the ordinance amendment
recommended by the Planning Board may not provide an adequate level of flexibility to best meet
the modern operational and economic needs of certain existing buildings in the North Beach Resort
Historic District.
Commission Memorandum of March 17, 2004
Second Reading Public Hearing - Rooftop Additions in the Proposed North Beach Resort Historic District
Page 50f5
CITY COMMISSION ACTION
On February 25, 2004, the Mayor and City Commission approved (6 to 0; 1 absence) the
companion ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort Historic District,
as recommended bv the Historic Preservation Board, on first reading and scheduled a second
reading public hearing for March 17,2004.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, based upon the above analysis, the Administration recommends that the Mayor and City
Commission adopt the proposed amending ordinance on second reading public hearing by
approving the companion ordinance amendment for rooftop additions in the North Beach Resort
Historic District (as adopted on first reading by the City Commission on February 25,2004).
JMG:C~JGG:WHC:SMA
F:IPLANI$HPBINBRESORnNBRHDrooftopord.CC2ndrdgmemo.doc
T:\AGENDAI2004\Mar1704\Regular\NBRHDrooftopord.CC2ndrdgmemo.doc
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
DlJdo Ilo!-I (now IIw RItz CwIlonI- 1_ CoIl... A.........
DlLIdo Hotel (now IIw RItz c.llon) - 1_ CoIl... Avenue
.~',,'~~.] ,', ,';,~
~, .' I
, ~" I
m1;.ii.., ,i
J ' ,<
. - ,~,;, ;~~J",
!' - ?:J1 ...~
,- _..:' '~
.' ~' t, . : ~
fe::"
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
Allleon Holel (Ielerllw Comfor1Inn end now 10 __ c:.to.neI-1261 CoIIIne A....n..
Propoud Twc>8IOf)' _op Addition Approved .., lIw Hletorlc .....ervetlon Board
Allleon Hotel (_lIw Comfor1Inn end now 10 __ c.beneI- W1 ~ A.........
Propoud Tw....1oIy ~ Addition Approved .., lIw Hletorlc .......,,1II1on Board
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
Netlwr_ _1-1330 0001.. DrIve
_Igh _1- 1773 Co.... Av....
1
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
T,"- .-. - 801 eo.... Av.....
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
~..l"- - .11 Ooeen Drlve
EXAMPLES OF ROOFTOP ADDITIONS IN MIAMI BEACH'S HISTORIC DISTRICTS
Ilert>lIon'-' - 530 Ooeen Drive
(
; L.iiiii:: ~:..~~ ' ,.,. j
\~~ . ",'ij'
~l J t,- f' \
:- r~,-,-, J
_/~. ..
2
~
~
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
I
II
~.
,~
;,lEI
NOTICE IS HEREBY given that a pUblic hearing will be held by the Mayllr and
City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, in the Commission
Chambeis, 3rd floor, City Hall, 1700 Convention Center DriVe, Miami Beach,
Florida, on Wednesday, March 17, 2004, at 5:01 p.m" to consider the
following: '
Ari Ordinance Amending The Land Development Regulations Of The Mi_}'
Beach City Code; Amendln~ Chapter 142" "Zoning' Districts AIIt;,:
Regulations"Amending Section 142-1161, "Height RegulatlWl";:i
Exceptions.Amending Section 142-1161(D), "Rooftop Additions.' By,'
Modifying The prohlbnion Of Rooftop Additions Of More Than One Story In '
The North Beach Resort Historic District; Providing For COdfficatlon, Repeater,
Severability, And An Effective Date. .
Inquiries may be directed to the Plann'ing Department at (305)673.-7550.
INTERESTED PARTIES 'are invned to appear' at 'this meeting, or be
represented by an agent, or to express their views in writing addressed to the
City Commission, c/o the City Clerk, ,1700 Convention Center DrIve, 1 st Floor,
City Hall, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. Copies of this ordinance are available
for public inspection during normal business hours In the,city ClerK's 0fIlce.
1700 Convention Center Drive, 1 st Floor, City Hall, Miami Beach, AorIda
33139. This meeting may be continued and under such circumstances
addnlonallegal notice would not be provided. c,
Robert E. Parcher: 'City Clerk
City of Miami Beach ,
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Fla. Stat." the City hereby advises the Public
that: ff a parson decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission
wnh respect to any matter considered at its meeting or Its hearing, such person
must ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record '
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be basee!'
This notice does not constllute consent by the City for the Introduction or .
admission of otherwise inadmissible or Irrelevant evidence, nor does. II
authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowed by law.
To request this matarial In accessible formet, sign lenguage Interpreters,
Information on access for persons with disabilities, and/or any accommodation
to review any document or participate in any city-sponsored proceeding, please
contact 305-604-2489 (voice), 305-673-7218(TTY) five days in advance to
inlliate your request. TTY users may also call 711 (Florida Relay Service).
Ad #252
~
m
i
~
';;
o
'. )>
.~. ....
J:
'.
2
:'"
~
101: