Mayor's ADCD Panel Final Report (2-18-22) adopted
FINAL REPORT OF THE
MAYOR’S ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT PANEL
Panel Members:
Jonathan Plutzik, Chair
Jonathan Freidin, Vice-Chair*
Nisi Berryman
Nicole Bostick***
Daniel Ciraldo
Ricardo Dopico**
Tom Donall
Kim Kovel
Robin Jacobs
Jane Krupp
Marc Lawrence
Dawn McCall*
Salem Mounayyer
Jennifer Roberts
Curtis Slipman
John Stuart
Ricardo Tabet*
Last meeting attended:
*December 15, 2021
** October 29, 2021
*** June 4, 2021
Page 2 of 8
FINAL REPORT OF THE
MAYOR’S ART DECO CULTURAL DISTRICT PANEL
FEBRUARY 18, 2022
Background
Mayor Dan Gelber established the Mayor’s Art Deco Cultural District Panel (the “Panel”) on
December 7, 2020 to assist the City’s urban design and planning consultant, Zyscovich Architects
(the “Consultant” or “Zyscovich”), in the Consultant’s preparation of a comprehensive land use,
mobility and economic development planning study (the “Vision Plan” or “Zyscovich Plan”) for
the Mixed-Use Entertainment/Art Deco Cultural District (the “ADCD” or the “District”), as
authorized pursuant to City Commission Resolution No. 2020-31388. The Mayor appointed
Jonathan Plutzik as Chair and Jonathan Freidin as Vice-Chair.
Panel Mission
The Panel was created pursuant to the Mayor's authority to establish boards or committees under
Section 2-27(b)(2) of the City Code. The mission of the Panel is to study and make
recommendations as to how to improve the experience for residents and visitors of the District.
Summary of Activities
On January 8, 2021, the Panel convened the first of twenty-two (22) meetings. Each meeting was
publicly noticed and benefited from robust public comment and participation, ensuring that the
Panel helped foster active community engagement in the development of the Consultant’s final
work product. At every Panel meeting, during its 15-month tenure, the Panel received
presentations and updates from subject matter experts including from the Consultant team
(Zyscovich, Town Square Corp., Kittelson & Associates, Lambert Advisory, Gehl and Raymond
Jungles Landscaping), multiple City staff, and guest speakers including urbanist Richard Florida.
Initial meetings of the Panel included presentations and discussions regarding Ocean Drive traffic
configuration options and side street challenges, enhancement of public safety measures, proposed
amendments to the Land Development Regulations, and the Consultant’s proposal for expansion
of Lummus Park.
• On January 22, 2021, Zyscovich led a discussion regarding alternative pilot options for
consideration regarding vehicular traffic on Ocean Drive. The alternative options proposed
various iterations of a one-way southbound street, including different traffic access points,
incorporation of pedestrian zones, and use of access limitation devices. While the Panel
did not have complete unanimity regarding the re-introduction of vehicles, the Panel
articulated a general preference for prioritizing the pedestrian experience of Ocean Drive.
The Panel appreciates the continued pursuit of a pedestrian and bicycle rich emphasis for
the entire ADCD reflected in the final Zyscovich Plan.
• Zyscovich also introduced the concept of more than doubling the size of Lummus Park by
utilizing the park area between the dune and coral rock wall and extending the reach of the
park up to the Ocean Drive buildings by removing street curbs and harmonizing the grade
Page 3 of 8
of the street and park. Although this preliminary concept requires much further analysis,
the Panel is very enthusiastic about the idea of enlarging the public park and enhancing the
public’s use of the space. The Panel encourages the City Commission to consider
immediately authorizing the development of an RFQ for Lummus Park expansion design.
• On February 12, 2021, Zyscovich led a discussion amongst the Panel and staff from the
City’s Parking and Transportation Departments regarding east-west side streets
intersecting Collins Avenue and Ocean Drive. The Panel encouraged the Consultant to
examine and seek methods for alleviating utilization and access issues experienced with
these side streets including: commercial loading and existing designated zones conflicting
with other uses; negative impacts on traffic, access, and circulation on side streets; parking
and rideshare concerns; valet parking operations; directional signage; lighting; and trash
collection. The Panel believes that further examination of the Zyscovich recommendation
to consider making the streets that terminate on Ocean Drive one way east or west is worthy
of immediate additional study.
• Planning Department staff also introduced proposed amendments to Chapter 142 of the
Land Development Regulations and Zyscovich began the discussion with the Panel
regarding how modification of zoning and land use regulations could help encourage
and/or deter activities and uses in the District. The Panel acknowledged how the District’s
aged, historic building stock presented limitations and expressed interest in examining
proposed amendments that could positively impact activities and/or encourage investment
and adaptive reuse of buildings. The Panel was clear in its view that the historic façade
architecture and related interior public spaces on Ocean Drive and in much of the ADCD
is sacrosanct. It was historically protected by a determined group of citizens and has
critically shaped our community, lifestyle and brand and it is essential that we embrace its
continuing iconic role in defining our future.
In February and March 2021, at the request of Chair Plutzik, the Panel assisted the City
Administration in compiling “Quick Wins” suggestions, a diverse list of over 100 short-term,
actionable items aimed at improving the appearance and quality of life within the ADCD. Over
the remainder of the Panel’s term, members of the City Administration returned to provide
progress reports on implementation of feasible Quick Wins measures throughout the ADCD,
including updates and progress reports on various relevant matters impacting the District, such as
the Ocean Drive right-of-way configuration, high impact events, cultural activations and
programming, and marketing and branding initiatives. The Panel continues to believe there are
many other opportunities for “Quick Wins” in the ADCD. It is essential that we keep after such
opportunities to improve conditions, many seeming superficial or cosmetic but critically important,
in the ADCD every day. We don’t have “broken windows”, but the same motivation applies.
The Consultant team delivered several in-depth workshops and presentations on analysis of the
planning concerns underpinning the Consultant’s scope, including focused workshops featuring
the expertise of sub-consultants.
Page 4 of 8
• On March 12, 2021, sub-consultant Kittelson & Associates offered a presentation on
Transportation and Mobility Initial Observations, highlighting initial findings from
mobility analysis on topics including transit routes, planning for modal priorities and
multimodal facilities, safety issues and opportunities, and curb management. The Panel
displayed interest in the pre-COVID-19 statistical data demonstrating decreasing
dependence on automobiles in favor of bicycle and pedestrian movement.
• On March 26, 2021, sub-consultants Gehl Architects and Town Square presented a
workshop on Street Life and Programming, including an introduction to the concept of an
independent management entity for Lummus Park such as a conservancy. The Panel
embraced concepts presented in the workshop including the need to identify shared
priorities to guide ADCD planning, consideration of effective management models for
Lummus Park, and building awareness for “putting people first” in the design process. To
achieve our placemaking objectives in the ADCD, the Panel encourages the City
Commission to explore best practices concerning governance. The Panel attached value to
the input of Zyscovich team member and placemaking expert Jerome Barth in this process.
We encourage the Commission to explore Conservancy models for the management of
Lummus Park, Ocean Drive, and the greater ADCD.
• On April 23, 2021, Zyscovich and sub-consultant Lambert Advisory led a workshop on
Retail, Tourism, and Entertainment Potential. The Panel discussed the office market as it
relates to the District, how to encourage certain uses and business operations, and how an
expansion of the Lummus Park footprint could benefit the economic vitality of Ocean
Drive.
• On May 21, 2021, Bernard Zyscovich led an intensive workshop on Urban Design, Open
Space, Mobility, and Transit, held in person at the historic Collins Avenue facing Carlton
Hotel which in 2017 was made part of the Ocean Drive facing Betsy Hotel complex. As
Zyscovich presented the vision for the character of the District, the Panel generally
expressed support for Zyscovich’s identified objectives, such as protecting the District’s
history and character; rebalancing hotels, the hospitality industry, and residential activities;
expanding the landscape to create a great park and public spaces; enhancing the character
of the street scenes; and managing density to welcome all people. During a subsequent
discussion on June 4, 2021, members of the Panel agreed that access control tactics such
as congestion price or physical barriers like bollards deem further exploration. The Panel
endorses the exploration of a congestion traffic pricing program for the ADCD. Whatever
balance the Commission ultimately strikes concerning vehicular vs pedestrian activity,
using modern technology tools to effectively manage ADCD vehicular traffic is an
essential long-term priority.
• On June 18, 2021, Zyscovich and sub-consultant Lambert Advisory presented a workshop
on Land Use and Zoning considerations including discussion with the Panel of east-west
connections in the District, activation of alleyways, and responsive management of public
spaces. The Panel embraced the need to focus on east-west connections and advocated for
Page 5 of 8
greater consideration for the shared dynamic among bicycles and vehicles with pedestrians
in the street.
On June 23, 2021, approximately halfway through the Panel’s initial term, Zyscovich prepared a
draft conceptual plan based on the Panel’s input from the preceding workshops and presented the
draft concept as a progress report to the City Commission. The presentation summarized the
discussions and topics of the committee to date and presented an outline of the Consultant’s
proposed study concepts and recommendations. The City Commission was generally receptive to
the Consultant’s bold direction and ideas surrounding urban planning and Lummus Park and
offered support for the transformative nature of his vision.
During ongoing discussions regarding the Consultant’s conceptual plan and concerning
presentations made by members of the City Administration at subsequent meetings, the Panel
voted to adopt the following motions:
• July 2, 2021: Recommended that the City supports the Panel’s efforts by obtaining
empirical data, such as conducting a statistical survey, of the community’s perceptions
about existing conditions on Ocean Drive and the various transportation and mobility
options proposed, including specifically whether to include vehicular traffic.
• July 16, 2021: To express support for the City Commission’s initiatives and the allocation
of funding for cultural activations in Lummus Park and elsewhere in the District.
Recognizing the important role of placemaking, cultural activations should be community-
building and based on an educational or not-for-profit ideology.
• October 29, 2021: In response to the October 27, 2021, direction by the City Commission
regarding the Restaurant Recovery Outdoor Seating Pilot Program, the Sidewalk Café
Permit Program, and the Ocean Drive Interim Reconfiguration, the Panel recognizes the
complexity involved in removing existing cafés from the right-of-way and installing new
parklets when Art Basel and the holidays are soon approaching. The Committee encourages
the City Manager to carefully consider potential adverse impacts, to avoid construction
during high impact periods, and perhaps refrain from implementation until after the New
Year’s holiday.
On December 17, 2021, Bernard Zyscovich delivered to the Panel a presentation on the draft
Vision Plan findings and provided the committee an opportunity to offer final input and
commentary. Accordingly, the Consultant revised its report to incorporate suggestions made by
the Panel, including: improving the description of the “Responsive Management of Public Spaces”
section; modifications to the proposed landscape scheme options and updating renderings to better
depict retention of the existing coconut palm canopy; illustrating potential options for installing
public art and an urban plaza at the street end at 10th Street; as well as enhancing the persuasiveness
of the visioning through the addition of new renderings and aerial images depicting the “before
and after” transition from existing to proposed conditions.
Page 6 of 8
Summary Recommendations and Observations
The Panel has spent 15 months listening, discussing, evaluating, and participating in the
development of the issues and underpinnings of the Vision Plan. The Panel recognizes that the
Vision Plan is not intended to address any one underlying issue or element of planning, nor does
it purport to deliver distilled design specifications. Therefore, its composite elements will require
substantial further honing and analysis for the conceptual vision to be implementation ready.
The Panel commends the efforts of the Zyscovich-led team to produce a holistic and long-term
conceptual vision for use going forward as a tool in the City’s efforts to reimagine the District and
improve the status quo. The Panel salutes the Zyscovich vision of a substantially expanded
Lummus Park, east to the dunes, west to the historic Ocean Drive facades and integrated in the
side streets extending to the east side of Washington Avenue. The vision of the flexible meandering
pathway to allow for an enhanced and enlarged promenade area is also of interest to the Panel. The
final Zyscovich report is, of course, simply a vision, not a final plan. Much careful thought must
be given to the definition of a comprehensive landscaping plan and Lummus Park programming
consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Enhancement of ocean views from Ocean Drive
properties and the park is a priority. We note that strong views were expressed by certain Panel
members concerning the importance of preserving substantially all of the existing historic palm
tree canopy in the park.
Given the comprehensive structure and conceptual nature of the Vision Plan, the Panel endorses
the Vision Plan as a collection of recommendations that are worthy of serious consideration. While
the Panel respectfully refrains from an explicit endorsement of all aspects of the Vision Plan, the
Panel does encourage the City Commission to move expeditiously to identify areas that merit
immediate further planning focus. While there remain many issues to be considered, including
critical budgetary ones, the Panel finds immediate and expedited consideration of (i) Ocean Drive
reconfiguration, (ii) Lummus park expansion (iii) side street reimagination and (iv) further study
of governance options, to be particularly compelling.
• The Panel was clear in its view that the historic façade architecture and related interior
public spaces on Ocean Drive and in much of the ADCD is sacrosanct. It was historically
protected by a determined group of citizens and has critically shaped our community,
lifestyle and brand and it is essential that we embrace its continuing iconic role in defining
our future.
• The Panel noted the unique and profoundly important environmental issues that the City
confronts. Sensitivity to environmental resiliency must be kept in mind in all we choose
to do.
• While the Panel did not have complete unanimity regarding the re-introduction of vehicles,
the Panel articulated a general preference for prioritizing the pedestrian experience of
Ocean Drive. The Panel appreciates the continued pursuit of a pedestrian and bicycle rich
emphasis for the entire ADCD reflected in the final Zyscovich Plan.
• Although this preliminary concept requires much further analysis and consideration for
budgetary funding, the Panel is very enthusiastic about the idea of enlarging the public park
and enhancing the public’s use of the space. The Panel encourages the City Commission
Page 7 of 8
to consider immediately authorizing the development of an RFQ for Lummus Park
expansion design.
• Much careful thought must be given to the definition of a comprehensive landscaping plan
and Lummus Park programming consistent with the character of the neighborhood.
Enhancement of ocean views from Ocean Drive properties and the park is a priority. The
preservation of key sightlines, looking both east and west in the ADCD were important.
• We note that strong views were expressed by certain Panel members concerning the
importance of preserving substantially all the existing historic palm tree canopy in the park.
Similarly, certain panel members expressed the need for creating more significant shade
opportunities in the park than currently exist.
• The Panel highlights the critically important role of placemaking and cultural activations
in Lummus Park and throughout the ADCD. Consequently, anticipating such cultural
activations in the next phase detailed planning process is essential.
• The Panel believes that further examination of the Zyscovich recommendation to consider
making the streets that terminate on Ocean Drive one-way east or west is worthy of
immediate additional study. Optimization of drop-off, deliveries, and parking remains a
critically high priority. The Panel advocated for greater consideration for the shared
dynamic among bicycles and vehicles with pedestrians in the side streets.
• To achieve our placemaking objectives in the ADCD, the Panel encourages the City
Commission to explore best practices concerning governance. The Panel attached value to
the input of Zyscovich team member and placemaking expert Jerome Barth in this process.
We encourage the City Commission to explore Conservancy models for the management
of Lummus Park, Ocean Drive, and the greater ADCD.
• The Panel discussed the office market as it relates to the District, how to encourage certain
uses and business operations, and how an expansion of the Lummus Park footprint could
benefit the economic vitality of Ocean Drive. Similarly, economic and business
sustainability must be central to all we undertake in the ADCD.
• The Panel endorses the exploration of a congestion traffic pricing program for the ADCD.
Whatever balance the City Commission ultimately strikes concerning vehicular vs
pedestrian activity, using modern technology tools to effectively manage ADCD vehicular
traffic is an essential long-term priority.
• The Panel continues to believe there are many other opportunities for “Quick Wins” in the
ADCD. It is essential that we keep after such opportunities to beautify and improve
conditions, many seeming superficial or cosmetic but critically important, in the ADCD
every day. We don’t have “broken windows”, but the same motivation applies. Clean and
safe remain a continuing priority, short and long term. Similar attention to every design
detail is critical as the City Commission considers pursuing elements of the Zyscovich
Vision Plan.
Page 8 of 8
Acknowledgments
The Panel commends the City Commission’s engagement of a multidisciplinary professional
consultant group led by Bernard Zyscovich and Zyscovich Architects to provide comprehensive
planning recommendations for the Art Deco Cultural District. The ADCD District is the center of
the city’s tourism and culture urban district, blending residential, commercial, and recreational
uses and activities. Zyscovich assembled a consummate team of technical experts to analyze the
District’s challenges and opportunities and propose innovative solutions for improving mobility,
aesthetics, economic vitality, and the public realm.
The Panel gratefully acknowledges the support of the City Manager’s team during this process,
with a particular salute to the professionalism of the Economic Development Department.
The Panel transmits this report to the Mayor and City Commission with the recommendation that
key elements of the Zyscovich Plan advance to the next step of planning, design, and
implementation.
Approved and submitted February 18, 2022