Loading...
2004-25543 Reso RESOLUTION NO, 2004-25543 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH PERKINS AND WILL, INC,. IN THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $1,200,788 FOR THE PROVISION OF PLANNING, ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES REQUIRED TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE MUL TI- PURPOSE MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITY PROJECT AND FURTHER APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THIS AMOUNT ALONG WITH $299,813 FOR ASSOCIATED CIP OFFICE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CHARGES, FROM THE PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND, WHEREAS, on September 101h, 2003, the Mayor and City Commission approved Resolution No. 2003-25332, authorizing the execution of a Development Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and the New World Symphony (NWS) for the development of a portion of the Washington Avenue and 1 ih Street surface parking lots for construction of an educational, performance and internet broadcast facility with an exterior screen ("Soundspace"), and an approximately 320-space (+/-) public parking garage facility (the NWS Project); and WHEREAS, in approving the execution ofthe Agreement, the City Commission also directed that the Administration should proceed with developing a new Multipurpose Municipal Parking Facility (MMPF) on the site of the current City Hall surface lot to provide replacement parking for the NWS Project; and WHEREAS, the MMPF must be completed, or an alternate acceptable replacement parking location must be identified, prior to the NWS's anticipated commencement of the NWS Project construction in early 2008; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2003, the City Commission authorized the issuance of Request for Qualifications No. 69-02/03 for Architectural, Engineering, Design, and Construction Administration Services needed to Plan, Design, and Construct a Multipurpose Municipal Parking Facility on the Current Site of the City Hall Surface Parking Lot (the RFQ).; and WHEREAS, RFQ responses were received and ranked by an Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager; and WHEREAS, the Administration recommended that the City Commission authorize negotiations with the second-ranked firm of Perkins and Will over first-ranked Zyscovich Inc., since both firms are equally qualified but Zyscovich Inc. has done a significant amount of work for the City, while Perkins and Will has not done any work for the City; and ~ WHEREAS, the City Commission on February 4,2004 approved Resolution No. 2004-25479, selecting and authorizing the Administration to negotiate an agreement with Perkins and Will, in accordance with the Administration's recommendation; and WHEREAS, City and URS Program Management staff met three times with Perkins and Will to negotiate the MMPF project scope and fee; and WHEREAS, during the meetings it was determined that the exact number of parking spaces and amount of retail/office square footage in the MMPF project will not be finalized until the project planning phase has been completed and Perkins and Will's fee for construction design and administration varies substantially depending on these two variables; and WHEREAS, staff negotiated two fee options: Option One which provides for a total professional services fee of $1,200,788 based on a project with 480 parking spaces, 20,000 square feet of office/retail, a pedestrian bridge to City Hall, and required site improvements and utility extensions with an approximate construction cost of $9,085,250; Option Two which provides for a total professional services fee of $1 ,368,768 based on a project with 600 parking spaces, 50,000 square feet of office/retail, a pedestrian bridge, and site and utility improvements with an approximate construction cost of $14,761,250; and WHEREAS, the Administration recommends that the City Commission approve Option One in the amount of $1,200,788, and appropriate funding for this amount and the associated $299,813 for CIP Office management costs from the Parking Enterprise Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby approve and authorize the execution of an agreement with Perkins and Will, Inc., in the not to exceed amount of $1,200,788, for the provision of planning, architecture, landscape architecture, and engineering services required to design and construct the Multi-purpose Municipal Parking Facility project, and further appropriating funds in this amount, along with $299,813 for associated CIP Office project management charges, from the Parking Enterprise Fund. PASSED and ADOPTED this 14th, day ,2004. ~f CITYClER- ~ T:\AGENDA 12004\Apr1404\Regular\mmpfre5o.doc APPROVED Ml'O FORM & LANGUAGI & fOR EXECUnON ;lIf( ~ 'i.~Oy City . 0.. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY m Condensed Title: A resolution authorizing the execution of an agreement with Perkins and Will, Inc. in the amount of $1,200,788 for the provision of planning, architecture, landscape architecture, and engineering services required to design and construct the Multi-purpose Municipal Parking Facility (MMPF) project and appropriating said amount along with $299,813 in CIP Office project management charges from the Parking Enterprise Fund. Issue: Should the Mayor and City Commission authorize the execution of a professional services agreement with Perkins and Will, Inc. in the not to exceed amount of $1 ,200,788 for the provision of professional services required to design and construct the MMPF project and appropriate this amount along with $299,813 in associated CIP Office proiect manaoement? Item Summarv/Recommendation: In keeping with commitments made through the City's approval of the New World Symphony expansion project, the City needs to provide replacement parking in the form of a new MMPF on the current City Hall surface lot. The current schedule calls for substantial completion of the MMPF by November 2007 and final completion by February 2008. On September 10, 2003, the City Commission authorized the issuance of RFO No. 69-02/03 for Architectural, Engineering, Design, and Construction Administration Services needed to Plan, Design, and Construct the MMPF. On February 4,2004, the City Commission authorized the Administration to negotiate with Perkins and Will Inc. to provide required professional services for the project. City and URS Program Management staff met three times with Perkins and Will to negotiate project scope and fee. Since the exact number of parking spaces and amount of retail/office square footage in the project will not be determined until the completion of the planning phase, and Perkins and Will's fee varies significantly depending on the finalization of these two project elements, staff negotiated two options. Option One provides for a fee of $1,073,806, based on a project with 480 parking spaces, 20,000 square feet of office/retail, a pedestrian bridge to City Hall, and required site improvements and utility extensions with an approximate construction cost of $9,085,250; this scope of work is consistent with the intent of the project RFO. Option Two provides for a fee of $1,241,786 based on a project with 600 parking spaces, 50,000 square feet of office/retail, a pedestrian bridge, and site and utility improvements with an approximate construction cost of $14,761,250; this scope is consistent with the maximum build out of the project as described in the project RFO. In addition, staff negotiated a traffic consultant fee of $52,685 and a cost estimator's fee of $37,864, as well as a fee of $36,433 for the planning of required Meridian Avenue improvements; the design fee for the latter project element will be negotiated once the scope of work is defined in the planning process. The Administration recommends Commission approval of the Option One agreement with Perkins and Will in the amount of $1,200,788 and the appropriation of this amount, along with the associated CIP Office project management fee of 3.3% of the construction budget ($299,813) from the Parking Enterprise Fund. If it is determined during the planning process that the number of parking spaces and square footage needs to be increased, an additional services agreement will be negotiated with Perkins and Will based on the upper project scope limit and associated fee established in Option Two. Advisory Board Recommendation: I N.A. Financial Information: Source of Funds: :\AGENDA\2004\Apr1404IRegularlmmpfawardsum.d c AGENDA ITEM DATE R7E <{ -I<{ -Or CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: From: Mayor David Dermer and Date: April 14, 2004 Members of the City Commission Jorge M. Gonzalez \ I/V'-~ City Manager 0 U A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH PERKINS AND WILL, INC, IN THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $1,200,788 FOR THE PROVISION OF PLANNING, ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES REQUIRED TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE MUL TI- PURPOSE MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITY PROJECT AND FURTHER APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THIS AMOUNT ALONG WITH $299,813 FOR ASSOCIATED CIP OFFICE PROJECT MANAGEMENT CHARGES FROM THE PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND, Subject: ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. FUNDING: Funding for the agreement with Perkins and Will and the associated CIP Office charges in the total amount of $1,500,601 is available from the Parking Enterprise Fund. BACKGROUND: On September 10th, 2003, the Mayor and City Commission approved Resolution No. 2003- 25332 authorizing the execution of a Development Agreement between the City of Miami Beach and the New World Symphony (NWS) for the development of a portion of the surface parking lot, bounded by 17'h Street to the north, North Lincoln Lane to the south, Washington Avenue to the east and Pennsylvania Avenue to the west, for construction of an approximately 50,000 square foot educational, performance and internet broadcast facility with an exterior screen ("Soundspace"), and an approximately 320-space (+/-) public parking garage facility. In approving the execution of the Agreement, the Commission also directed that the Administration should proceed with developing a new Multipurpose Municipal Parking Facility (MMPF) on the site of the current City Hall surface lot. Throughout the negotiations with the NWS, the Administration has consistently stated that replacement parking must be built before displacement of either 17th Street surface parking lot. The City Commission Memorandum April 14, 2004 Award of Multi-purpose Municipal Parking Facility AE Services to Perkins and Will Page 2 of 3 Municipal Multipurpose Parking Facility must be built and completed, or an alternate acceptable replacement parking location must be identified, prior to NWS's commencement of project construction. The current schedule calls for substantial completion of the MMPF by November 2007 and final completion by February 2008. On September 10, 2003, the City Commission authorized the issuance of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 69-02/03 for Architectural, Engineering, Design, and Construction Administration Services needed to Plan, Design, and Construct a Multipurpose Municipal Parking Facility on the current site of the City Hall Surface Parking Lot. The RFQ was issued on September 29, 2003 and 13 proposals were received by the October 31, 2003 response deadline. An Evaluation Committee appointed by the City Manager met twice to review and rank the RFQ responses and subsequently ranked Zyscovich Inc. first and Perkins and Will second. The City Manager exercised his due diligence and reviewed the proposals submitted by Zyscovich and Perkins & Will, as well as copies of their respective presentations, and the results of the reference checks conducted by the Procurement Division and URS. It was evident from the documentation reviewed that both firms were equally competent and qualified to perform the services required for this project. Since the selection of the most qualified Architectural and Engineering firm is governed by the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA), Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, the City Manager must also consider the volume of work previously awarded by the City, to ensure an equitable distribution of City projects~ Inasmuch as Perkins & Will has not previously been awarded a City contract, and considering the experience and qualifications of the Perkins & Will team, the City Manager recommended Perkins & Will as the top ranked firm. At their meeting on February 4, 2004, the City Commission approved Resolution 2004-25479 authorizing the Administration to negotiate with Perkins and Will to set fees for the required professional services. City and URS Program Management staff met three times with Perkins and Will to negotiate the project scope and fee. The exact number of parking spaces and amount of retail/office square footage in the project will not be determined until the project planning phase has been completed. Perkins and Will's fee for construction design and administration varies depending on these two variables. Staff considered negotiating only the planning phase fee at this time. However, this option was rejected as it would require a second fee negotiation and approval period which could delay the project. In an effort to keep the project on its ambitious implementation schedule, staff negotiated two fee options. Option One (Exhibit A) provides for a professional services fee of $1,073,806 (including $57,000 in reimbursables) based on a project with 480 parking spaces, 20,000 square feet of office/retail, a pedestrian bridge to City Hall, and required site improvements and utility extensions with an approximate construction cost of $9,085,250 (Exhibit B). This scope of work, which is detailed in Attachment A, is consistent with the intent of the project RFQ. Option Two (Exhibit C) provides for a professional services fee of $1 ,241 ,786 (including $57,000 in reimbursables) based on a project with 600 parking spaces, 50,000 square feet of office/retail, a pedestrian bridge, and site and utility improvements with an approximate City Commission Memorandum April 14, 2004 Award of Multi-purpose Municipal Parking Facility AE Services to Perkins and Will Page 3 of 3 construction cost of $14,761,250 (Exhibit D). This scope of work is consistent with the maximum build out of the project as described in the project RFQ. In addition to the design fee, staff negotiated a traffic consultant fee of $52,685 (Exhibit E), a cost estimator's fee of $37,864 (Exhibit F), and a fee of $36,433 (Exhibit G) for the planning of Meridian Avenue improvements which will be implemented as part of the project. The design fee for the latter project element will be negotiated once the scope of work is defined in the planning process; this two-step negotiation process for the streetscape improvements will not delay progress on the facility itself. With all of these associated costs included, the total Perkins and Will fee would be $1,200,788 for Option One and $1,368,768 for Option Two, In addition to Perkins and Will's fees for professional services for this project, the Commission has previously approved $1,003,882 for program management services to be provided by URS Corporation for the project. There is also a need to fund the City's own project management for the project which is provided by the CIP Office. The CIP management charge is typically 3.3% of the construction budget which for this project would amount to $299,813. This funding needs to be appropriated along with the total Perkins and Will fee of $1,200,788 for a total appropriation of $1,500,601. Funding in this amount is available from the Parking Enterprise Fund. CONCLUSION: The Administration recommends that the Commission approve the Option One agreement with Perkins and Will in the amount of $1,200,788 and appropriate funding forthis amount and the associated $299,813 for CIP Office management costs from the Parking Enterprise Fund. If it is determined during the planning process that the number of parking spaces and square footage needs to be increased. an additional services agreement will be negotiated with Perkins and Will based on fees already established for the upper project scope limit defined in Option Two. T:\AGENDA\2004\Apr1404\Regularlmmpfawardmemo.doc