Loading...
Resolution 2024-32967 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-32967 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, DIRECTING THE ADMINITRATION TO TERMINATE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2023-506-WG FOR NON- EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE WASTE HAULERS TO PROVIDE MULTI-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL AND TO PREPARE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR A "SINGLE HAULER" FOR SUCH SERVICES, TO AWARD AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO THE QUALIFIED PROPOSER HAVING THE MOST COMPETITIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL, INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO CUSTOMER PRICING, SUCH RFP TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE; AND, FURTHER, APPROVING THE EXTENSION, ON A MONTH-TO-MONTH BASIS, OF THE CONTRACT TERM FOR THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENTS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE NEW FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO BE AWARDED PURSUANT TO THE RFP BECOMES EFFECTIVE: (1) THE NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE WASTE CONTRACTOR AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND (A)WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA AND (B) WASTE CONNECTIONS OF FLORIDA, INC. (COLLECTIVELY, THE "FRANCHISE WASTE - CONTRACTORS") AND (2) THE SERVICE AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY AND THE FRANCHISE WASTE CONTRACTORS FOR ADDITIONAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES AND COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS AT CITY OWNED PROPERTIES, PARKS, RIGHTS OF WAY, AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES; AND FURTHER, APPROVING THE CITY MANAGER'S EXECUTION OF AMENDMENTS AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2023 TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS AND SERVICE AGREEMENT MEMORIALIZING THE APPROVED TERM EXTENSION. WHEREAS, on October 16, 2019, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2019-31056, extending the City's Non-Exclusive Franchise Waste Contractor Agreements with Waste Management Inc. of Florida and Waste Connections of Florida, Inc. for the provision of multi-family and commercial waste collection and disposal services in the City, as well as a new Service Agreement with each of the non-exclusive franchisees for municipal waste and recycling services,for a period of three(3)years, commencing as of October 1, 2019, and expiring on September 30, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Department engaged MidAtlantic Solid Waste Consultants (MSW) to assist staff with evaluating the current agreement structure and to provide recommendations for an open versus closed, exclusive versus non-exclusive waste contractor paradigm; and WHEREAS, in addition to surveying commercial collection systems in ten (10) South Florida municipalities, MSW sought to receive input from businesses and, although only a limited number of businesses responded, the issues that were important to the respondents were fairly consistent across the board and included: • Improving quality of service, including collection consistency • Improving hauler accountability • Adding clarity to contract pricing, including special charges • Decreasing traffic and the number of waste collection vehicles on the street • Increasing uniformity(i.e., more standard dumpsters and carts) • Receiving City support for customer service, enforcement and contract disputes WHEREAS, at the April 29, 2022, Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee (FERC) meeting, the City Administration presented MSW's findings, including and, among them, MSW recommended that the City transition to an exclusive franchise system for multi-family residential and commercial waste collection and disposal services and, in support of its recommendation, offered the following benefits the City could expect to derive by implementing a single-hauler system (MSW's presentation at the April 29, 2022 FERC meeting is attached hereto as Exhibit A): • Procurement process allows for competitive bidding • Prices should decrease for most businesses • Improved service level and pricing transparency • Improved operational efficiencies and economies of scale • Streamlined contract management and oversight • Improved hauler accountability • Less truck traffic on streets • Fewer greenhouse gas emissions WHEREAS, MSW also pointed out the arguments against implementing a single-hauler system,which included, limited customer choice, some customers may experience rate increases and the potential for the perception of reduced market competitiveness; and WHEREAS, the FERC directed MSW to expand its analysis to include additional municipalities,and to return to a future FERC meeting with its findings; and WHEREAS, MSW thereafter studied 139 municipalities in Miami-Dade County, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Pinellas County, Lee County, Collier County and Monroe County; and WHEREAS, MSW returned to the FERC meeting on May 27, 2022 and reported that 63% of the municipalities included in their review had an exclusive franchise system in place, whereas 16% had an open market system, 5% had a non-exclusive franchise system and 17% offered waste collection and disposal services directly(MSW's follow-up presentation at the May 27, 2022 FERC meeting is attached hereto as Exhibit B); and WHEREAS, the City Commission on July 20, 2022 via Resolution No. 2022-32228, approved Public Works' request to extend, on a month-to-month basis, the contract term of the Non-exclusive Commercial Franchise Waste Contractor Agreement and Service Agreement with Waste Management Inc. of Florida, and Waste Connections of Florida, Inc., for a period not to exceed twelve months through September 30, 2023; and WHEREAS, the item was heard and discussed at several additional FERC and City Commission meetings that took place between July 2022 and July 2023, culminating in a request by the Administration at the September 27, 2023 City Commission meeting for authorization to issue RFQ 2023-506-WG (the "RFQ") for the selection of qualified franchise waste haulers to provide multifamily residential and commercial waste collection and disposal services and the adoption by the Commission of Resolution No. 2022-32833 authorizing the issuance of the RFQ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolutions 2023-32617 and 2022-32833, the City Commission also authorized the month-to-month extension of the non-exclusive Franchise Waste Contractor Agreements and accompanying franchise fees, in-kind services, and other program contributions, as well as the Service Agreement for the collection of waste and recyclable materials at City- owned properties and rights of way, all of which were set to expire on September 30, 2023, until such time as the solicitation process of the RFQ was completed and the new contracts are in place; and WHEREAS, because this Resolution directs the administration to terminate the RFQ and issue a Request for Proposals ("RFP")for a single hauler, the month-to-month extensions should remain in effect until such time as a new franchise agreement is awarded pursuant to the RFP; and WHEREAS, the City has given further consideration to the desirability of pursuing an exclusive franchise/single waste hauler solution for multifamily residential and commercial waste collection and disposal services; and WHEREAS, in addition to the benefits afforded by an exclusive franchise system as previously reported by MSW at the April 29, 2022 FERC meeting, an exclusive franchise system would yield the following advantages: • Standardized collection costs • Stabilized yearly cost increases for users • More efficient routing of collection vehicles • Enhanced enforcement of health and safety laws as a result of having a single contractor to monitor • Easier supplemental customer support by the City (or possibly require the franchisee to have customer support staff dedicated exclusively to addressing the concerns of City customers to obviate or at least minimize the need for the City to have its own supplemental customer support team). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission direct the Administration to terminate Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2023-506- WG for Non-Exclusive Franchise waste haulers to provide multi-family and commercial waste collection and disposal and to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a "Single Hauler" for such services, to award an exclusive franchise for such services to the qualified proposer having the most competitive and comprehensive proposal, including with respect to customer pricing, such RFP to be reviewed and approved by the Mayor and City Commission prior to issuance; and, further, approving the extension, on a month-to-month basis, of the contract term for the following agreements until such time as the new franchise agreement to be awarded pursuant to the RFP becomes effective: (1) the non-exclusive franchise waste contractor agreements between the city and (a)Waste Management Inc. of Florida and (b)Waste Connections of Florida, Inc. (collectively, the Franchise Waste Contractors") and (2) the service agreement among the city and the Franchise Waste Contractors for additional solid waste collection services and collection of recyclable materials at city owned properties, parks, rights of way, and other public facilities and properties; and further,, approving the city manager's execution of amendments, effective as of October 1, 2023, to the franchise agreements and service agreement memorializing the approved term extension. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 53 day of /*al , 2023. Steven Meiner, Mayor ATTEST: MAR 1 5 2024 Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk I 111 i DAATED;,0 (Sponsored by Commissioner Laura Dominguez) w""N" ``` Co-Sponsored by Commissioner David Suarez APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE FOR EXECUTION . City Attorney A/2 Date Resolutions-R7 E MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Rafael A. Paz, City Attorney DATE: March 13, 2024 SUBJECT:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO TERMINATE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) 2023-506-WG FOR NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE WASTE HAULERS TO PROVIDE MULTI- FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL AND TO PREPARE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR A "SINGLE HAULER" FOR SUCH SERVICES, TO AWARD AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO THE QUALIFIED PROPOSER HAVING THE MOST COMPETITIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL, INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO CUSTOMER PRICING, SUCH RFP TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE; AND, FURTHER, APPROVING THE EXTENSION, ON A MONTH-TO-MONTH BASIS, OF THE CONTRACT TERM FOR THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENTS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE NEW FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO BE AWARDED PURSUANT TO THE RFP BECOMES EFFECTIVE: (1) THE NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE WASTE CONTRACTOR AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND (A) WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA AND (B) WASTE CONNECTIONS OF FLORIDA, INC. (COLLECTIVELY, THE "FRANCHISE WASTE CONTRACTORS")AND (2)THE SERVICE AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY AND THE FRANCHISE WASTE CONTRACTORS FOR ADDITIONAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES AND COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS AT CITY OWNED PROPERTIES, PARKS, RIGHTS OF WAY, AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PROPERTIES; AND FURTHER, APPROVING THE CITY MANAGER'S EXECUTION OF AMENDMENTS AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2023 TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS AND SERVICE AGREEMENT MEMORIALIZING THE APPROVED TERM EXTENSION. BACKGROUND/HISTORY Was this Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which, as defined in Code Sec. 2-481, includes a principal engaged in lobbying? No Page 537 of 1070 If so, specify name of lobbyist(s)and principal(s): N/A ANALYSIS The proposed Resolution was prepared at the request of the sponsor, Commissioner Laura Dominguez SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA N/A FINANCIAL INFORMATION N/A Is this a"Residents Right Does this item utilize G.O. to Know" item. pursuant to Bond Funds? City Code Section 2-14? No. No Legislative Tracking Office of the City Attorney Sponsor Commissioner Laura Dominguez and Co-sponsored by Commissioner David Suarez • ATTACHMENTS: Description ❑ Resolution ❑ Exhibit"A" ❑ Exhibit'B" • Page 538 of 1070 Exhibit A 2t MSW Presentation at April 29, 2022 FERC Meeting Page 543 of 1070 Commercial Solid Waste Services Franchise Agreement Miami Beach City Commission Finance & Economic Resiliency Committee April 29, 2022 w! f45w Midatlantic Solid Waste (MSW) Consultants • Founded in 2004 • Headquartered in Orlando with offices in Pennsylvania & Maryland • • Key Practice Areas: o Solid waste system planning o Material stream characterization .441114iN o Collection and facility operations fS14 So Recycling program optimization CONSULrraNTs cgo Solid waste user fee and rate studies 0o Procurement and contracting support 0 Project Overview: • MSW Consultants engaged by City in November 2021 to support 2022 re- bid of commercial solid waste franchise services. Key project tasks include: Benchmarking of Regional Cities �iyYA Business Outreach & Rate Analysis CD Procurement Support & Recommendations O MSW Miami Beach Solid Waste & Recycling Services Overview: Residential up to 8 Units = -6,700 Households • Includes single-family homes and residential structures up to 8 dwelling units • 2x week garbage;weekly yard trash;scheduled bulk (Waste Connections) • Weekly recycling (Coastal Waste & Recycling — through Miami-Dade County) • Drop-off services for bulk,yard trash,e-waste, etc. Commercial, incl. Multi-family 8+ units = -2,300 properties. Collection services from: • Dumpsters - • Compactors '• • Roll-out carts Commercial and multi-family properties contract directly with • haulers for service risw Miami Beach Commercial Solid Waste Service Providers: • Waste Management: • Waste Connections: o 6 I% of market share o 39% of market share o — I,400 properties or o —900 properties or accounts accounts • -o 0 WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC. m to CO O rie;b NISW ContractTerms & Selected Special Services: • Contract terms: • in-kind services: o Contracts initiated in October o Collections at 30+ City facilities 2014 o Public litter/recycling can o Price is negotiated between collections (approx. 1000 haulers and customers; City is containers) & special events not involved in setting fee collections containers • structure. o 3-year extensions in September • Other funding support: 2019 o $400,000 for illegal dumping o Contracts expire September programs 30,2022 o $90,000 for environmental -0o Staff to seek month-to-month education extensions to September 30, o $60,000 for 4 Household w2023,to facilitate procurement Hazardous Waste events o process o $25,000 for environmental oprograms MSW Benchrnarking: • Researched cities in: Q. West PaImlBeach o Miami-Dade County I Delray Bea a o Broward County Q " " ora B° " o" 5 • a� Tamarac • �Q ach • • Sundae o Palm Beach County ponl rr N rd.,e Devle N . Miami • r� • • • Evaluated • contracts and Hte•yeiho • N. M4ml • • •• C laml N " •' •Om! 1 T each 0:3pricing for I 0 cities W :KJNC ' w'';c�{r�y1 aE Homestead r:Te?tip' v O NiSVd Solid Waste Management System Approaches: Less Regulatory Control More Regulatory Control Open Market Non-Exclusive • Allows for larger • Can permit multiple • Franchisee is only number of franchisees who service provider and companies to compete for service has exclusive"right" compete • Can be organized by to provide service •solid waste geographic area `generators hire their • Current Miami sown hauler Beach system 0 Ali 0 0 1 rises Commercial Collection System Organization in Other Cities Cit Count Po•ulation Form of Re!ulation Boca Raton Palm Beach 97,422 Non-Exdusive Franchise Coral Gables Miami-Dade 49,248 Exclusive Franchise Coral Springs Broward I34,394 Exclusive Franchise Davie Broward 105,691 Exclusive Franchise Delray Beach Palm Beach 66,846 Exclusive Franchise Hialeah Miami-Dade 223,109 Open Market Miami Miami-Dade 442,241 Open Market Miami Beach Miami-Dade 82,890 Non-Exclusive Franchise North Miami Miami-Dade 60,191 Exclusive Franchise North Miami Beach Miami-Dade 43,676 Exclusive Franchise 1 Pgpano Beach Broward I I2,046 Exclusive Franchise Sumnise Broward 97,335 Exclusive Franchise cn Tagarac Broward 71,897 Exdusive Franchise Welt Palm Beach Palm Beach 117,415 Non-Exclusive Franchise ti Effie = Contracts and rates analyzed mil', frsSW Standard Commercial Container Rate Matrix pickups Per Week • Pricing matrix is best Container Container practice in commercial Type Size ix 2x 3x 4x 5x Dumpster 2yd $ $ $ $ $ solid waste services Dumpster 3 yd $ $ $ $ $ contracting Dumpster 4 yd $ $ $ $ $ Dumpster 6 yd $ $ $ $ $ Dumpster 8yd $ $ $ $ $ • Provides transparent framework for how services will be priced 0) 0 01 0 co 0 0 NISI"! Comparing Commercial Container & Compactor Rates 0. Commercial Containers Commercial Compactor Requires Standard Disposal Commercial Container City $ Charge Included? City Pricin:? Coral Gables $514 No Coral Gables Yes Coral Springs $442 No Coral Springs Yes Davie $275 No Davie No Delray Beach $266 No Delray Beach No North Miami $235 -$378 Yes North Miami Yes North Miami North Miami Beach Yes Beach $5 1 3 -$719 Yes Pompano Beach Yes Pompano Beach $337-$569 No or Sunrise Yes Sunrise $262 No o, Tamarac No Tamarac $320 No Wet Palm Beach Yes West Palm Beach N/A N/A 7/10 require haulers to use standard Compactor pricing consistent with rate matrix industry-standard but rates vary widely Comparing City Multi-Family Service Approaches • Four profiled cities include • Six cities treat multi-family multi-family dwellings as properties similar to separate customer class commercial establishments • Rates per-household: o Coral Gables o Delray Beach ($6.05/month) o Coral Springs o North Miami Beach o Davie ($I4.79/month) o North Miami o Pompano Beach o Sunrise ($I 6.44/month) o West Palm Beach co o Tamarac ($5. I 2/month) 0 • MSW Business Outreach: • MSW Consultants developed • Organizations contacted: I4-question survey to gather o Lincoln Road BID feedback on MF/C garbage and o Washington Avenue BID recycling services o Ocean Drive Association o Normandy Fountain Business • Request was for survey to be Association distributed to members o Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce '. v,: -.; Acr1 . . o Florida Restaurant& Lodging ""1Q° ''., 'if'y' Association (Miami-Dade County ' Ufa i' ;i w, s c ,.: :to. chapter) } o Miami Quality Management (property i ..�.;...,. . u_ mans ement firm). -=-� '.`=`�-• ` `. `::.. • Only 15 property or business • �r�R ai ,v._....,...-,.,...■ owner respondents a MI • Total potential audience of ,500+ 1.11111.11111.1.1.1111111. .iiI;, MSW Survey Responses: Existing Service What is Most Quality & Cost? Important? 9 8 r. 7 6 'y5� 5 43 x _ ► 2 II MI m Quality of Cost of Service? ni High-Quality Service Service? •Getting Lowest Price 3 Poor •Average ■Good ■Great •Ability to Select Hauler 0 NiSW Business Outreach: Qualitative Input • Improve quality of service, including collection consistency • Improve hauler accountability • Add clarity to hauler to property contract pricing, including special charges • Decrease traffic and the number of trucks on the street •w Increase uniformity (i.e., more standard dumpsters and carts) •E City support for contractor customer service, enforcement, 0 contract disputes sibs ��W Rate Analysis - Multi-Family : . • MSW Consultants obtained pricing pr information and hauler invoices from ,, . ,i,,; .,, :F property management firm ' ' ,b ` '. • 15 properties total;range in size from ` ' 6 to 21 dwelling units • Analyzed hauler invoices from 15 •:;,a, properties to review: ;n - 1' o Service levels (garbage & recycling) ;,y, . o Container types A o Charges and fees (including by type) o Costs 4 Per service 1vor ,_ti,,, .o. m ■ Per household �o Service capacity o s Garbage o • Recycling 0 sisiA msw Rate Analysis Multi-Family: • Rates for garbage and Garbage Low High Average recycling vary widely Cost/Month/Cubic Yard $20.05 $79.26 $44.69 • Many invoices include Cost/Month/HH $22.64 • $85.38 $43.27 Weekly Capacity(in Lbs.per HH) 6.8 40.7 23.6 supplemental charges: o Environmental Recycling Low High Average Cost/Month/Cubic Yard $25.82 $91.99 $50.40 o Administrative Cost/Month/HH $5.88 $24.89 $11.02 o Regulatory cost recovery Weekly Capacity(in Lbs.per HH) 1.82 5.10 2.6 o Fuel charges • Inconsistency in garbage and New franchise recycling capacity per HH agreement -o Low capacity in the form of should establish smaller containers or fewer capacity CD g pickups can lead to container standards 0 overflow or disposal of recyclables 0 hiS14 Commercial Procurement Support • Issue competitive procurement for • commercial services only ' • Change from non-exclusive system to u Dumpsters • • exclusive system o Commercial recycling must remain open- market, but exclusive hauler can still provide 41"': • • Compactors services • Sanitation Division to assume greater -responsibility for contractor management, ands. ,customer service, invoicing � Carts 4.MSW Consultants to draft procurement 0 documents and assist with evaluations Pros & Cons of Exclusive Collection: . 0 . Pro Con Ri Procurement process allows for [ Limited customer choice competitive pricing lxl Some rates may increase U Prices should decrease for most I_Xi Perceived reduction in market businesses competitiveness R Improved service level and pricing transparency CI Improved operational efficiencies & economies of scale C Streamlined contract management and oversight c] Improved hauler accountability R Less truck traffic on streets U Fewer GHG emissions Potential Bidding Market: South Florida Municipal Contracts Other Potential Market Waste Entrants Management Waste GFL - Environmental Connections ` WA,I !CON41:(110N%.IN(:. ����� Republic Services Waste& JJ's Waste & .. telyRecycling Recycling Coastal Coastal Waste & Weals!a Rcc cImq Recycling 1 iNASTE PRO) Waste Pro `ri FCC w Environmental Qnvlronmentell Services Services O MSN! Summary of Recommendations: IJAuthorize staff to procure commercial solid waste franchise services under an exclusive franchise system R1Authorize staff to negotiate month-to-month extensions not to exceed l 2 months with Waste 1anagement and Waste Connections to allow for Orocurement process to move forward �,W Other Options: I. Revert to open-market °°°"` °.4� for commercial collections: z; ;� a. City could license haulers c ._ 2. Maintain status quo Zone 2 approach with 2 non- Miami : -ach exclusive haulers 0 0 0 0 * 9CC!RI' UR.ATED * ThankYou & Questions sot John Culbertson Principal (407) 380-8951 Jculbertson@mswconsultants.com wisps! CONSULTRNTS CD Phil Bresee Senior Consultant (954) 604-9475 Pbresee@mswconsultants.com Exhibit B MSW Presentation at FERC May 27, 2022 Meeting Page 567 of 1070 Solid Waste Hauler Commercial Franchise Hauler Presentation BFA RISING 'ABOVE Update to April 29, 2022, FERC Meeting Takeaways from the Last Presentation • Low Response to the On-Line Survey ti • Only IS Responses Received x • Limited Municipality Data Sampling Reviewed • 13 Municipalities 2 Solid Waste Forum In-Person Public Meeting .-- ;4 Join the City of Miami Beach for a solid waste forum to discuss our commercial franchise waste hauler services for larger condominium, apartment buildings and businesses. Staff will be present to answer questions and collect input using a customer service survey. -:.i• . Thursday, June 23, 2022 from 6 PM to 7:30 PM r \` ' ' Miami Beach Golf Clubhouse -� . 2301 Alton Road r For more information, please contact Kevin Pulido at ., ., , kevinpulido©miamibeachfl.gov „ •1'',! ic' � f'..iBEACi I WWW.rniC1711be0ChfI.C.CV I„ ierjue l .'In•, ,,,,,l, nil in „In,.n.:,. 1uri:tc, grin ;(,rlytni t: 110h01.1:•Itu Itm n-duy rmoli:.r•I, rIU 10,1)• 1rt).••rlulh, 11 ulr re ••,S 1, 1 puiicm. will) li'i.ibt1111v, ;inr.;v •efyr.t,i..,r,minOLI(rh, 'i t.)',view wry de, umi niil v 1>rv;I(i1)01;.: ir, c:ny city;1,wi,r.ini] 1;itu,t:-milli i mill h..`; C;t4 2489:,ri•I:•r•letl 1 lot I:iif)mth 01 2 let .I:,iflo,ai IliEn , :)ti,>n •;'> -IY,.,r•Iti n ny rnlf vie 1 1 )I lorl,Jfl Rol-Tv°u•,vu•t) • • • Thirteen Municipalities Were Reviewed city „our. I'u tul.„iun harm of 12c'ul.tlion Boca Raton Palm Beach 97,422 Non-Exclusive Franchise Coral Gables Miami-Dade 49,248 Exclusive Franchise Coral Springs Broward 134,394 Exclusive Franchise Davie Broward 105,691 Exclusive Franchise ID Delray Beach Palm Beach 66,846 Exclusive Franchise CO al Hialeah Miami-Dade 223,109 Open Market cn V o, (Miami Miami Dade 442,241 Open Market O {Miami Beach Miami-Dade 82,890 Non-Exclusive Franchise (North Miami Miami-Dade 60,191 Exclusive Franchise North Miami Beach Miami-Dade 43,676 Exclusive Franchise Pompano Beach Broward 11.046 . Exclusive Franchise Sunrise Broward 97,335 Exclusive Franchise Tamarac Broward 71,897 Exclusive Franchise West Palm Beach Palm Beach 117,415 Non-Exclusive Franchise • . I . I 4 ' . Population by countyfor the cities reviewed POPULATION AND CITIES 3,000,000 Miami-Dade, 2,588,635 2,500,000 Broward, 1,928,018. ° • 91 Municipalities in Tri-County 2,000,000 NArea ! Palm Beach, 1,417,653 •048 Municipalities in Four 1,500,000 �I Pinellas, 964,416 °Additional Counties 1,000,000 Lee, 776,995 • Total of 139 Municipalities Collier, 382,680 Reviewed 500,000 Monroe, 83,411 30i8i3LLL . Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Pinellas Lee Collier Monroe •Population ■Total Cities 1 , 5 Number of Cities Reviewed Cities Reviewed Total Open Non County Population Exclusive City Cities Market Exclusive Miami-Dade 2,588,635 30 15 4 8 3 CO -,, Broward 1,928,018 28 3 1 21 3 w Palm Beach 1,417,653 33 1 2 25 5 O Pinellas 964,416 25 3 0 12 10 Lee 776,995 10 0 0 9 1 Collier 382,680 4 0 0 3 1 Monroe 83,411 9 0 0 9 0 Totals 8,141,808 139 22 7 87 23 16% 5% 63% 17% 6 Tn - CountyMarket By Percents e g TRI-COUNTY MARKET City 12% 2W: n Market , Open N co fl) Non-Exclusive V 8% O O v O Exclusive 59% ■Open Market •Non-Exclusive •Exclusive -City County Open Market Non-Exclusive Exclusive City Total Cities Tri Counties 19 7 54 11 91 21% 8% 59% 12% 100% 7 • Tn - County Market By Population TRI - COUNTY MARKET 1,800,000 1,600,000 1.5M 5 1,400,000 1.3M 0 •ia 1,200,000 1.0M c 1,000,000 0.8M Obi 800,000 CO 600,000 CD 0.4M Ol 400.000 0.2 M o 11aM NI IO_2j - O0.2Mal 200,000 O.1M M— 0 Open Non Exclusive Exclusive City v Market 0 AgreementType ■Broward IN Miami Dade County -Palm Beach County Broward Miami Dade Palm Beach Total Tri- County County County County County Open Market 371,767 1,535,985 2,142 r 1,909,894 Non Exclusive 58,714 838,728 217,301 ' 1,114,743 Exclusive 1,324,978 195,826 1,035,528 ' 2,556,332 City 172,559 18,096 162,682 ' 353,337 Total Population 1,928,018 2,588,635 1,417,653 5,934,306 8 Miami - Dade County City OPEn siv County Names Mulct Non Exclusive Franchise City Unincorporated 1,197,784 Bal Harbour 3,084 MIAMI- DADE COUNTY CRIES Biscayne Park 3,119 500•000 Coral Gables 50,193 Cutler Bay 45,478 450,000 Dotal 80,703 40a.000 Golden Beach 955 Z Hialeah 225,493 350,000 13 = Hialeah Gardens 23,055 N 0 Indian Creek 84 300,000 CO u Key Biscayne 14,815 250.000 (71 Medley 1,047 v W Miami 449,747 200,000 Cn Q O Miami Beach 82,785 --wictMiami Gardens 112,508 150000 O 0 Miami Lakes 30,857 p1 Miami Shores 11,548 loo.000 Miami Springs 13,851 50.000 North Bay Village 8,211 _ North Miami 60,175 I. I I 11 .1 1111 I. J ill Q North Miami Beach 43,749 ,ice9", et/ t (ir 41:4"�sb�Fp,(i,'_+Vt/." ,,c°41,4...40 Q' t� rp`P,i�' ,0 f,gyp'sb COpa-locka 16,570 `�0 �(,��'�di' YF 4 0.,,,, �sY`4°4 Z,. . �si1 4' t° C Palmetto Bay ff 24,499 O°Oe G es ' se4P 414104, e 0o�. ,i �3`F��?� y 11Pinecrest 18,419 South Miami 12,071 _ ■Open ■Nm Exclusive ■Exdusive Franchise +City Sunny Isles Beach 22,655 Market Surfside 5,593 Sweetwater 19,941 Virginia Gardens 2,371 Chart endudes unhxmporated MOM-lade Countywide?,has a population of 1,197,184 and B open nnAet West Miami 7,275 Total Service by Population 1,535,985 838,728 195,826 18,096 2,588,635 Total k of Cities 15 4 8 3 30 ' 9. • Broward County City Open County Names Market Non Exclusive FendLp City Unincorporated BC 17,079 Coconut Creek 57,871 Broward County Cities Cooper City 34,397 100.000 Coral Springs _ 134,558 180.000 Dania Beach 31,837_ Davie 106,199 tbo.o0o • Deerfield Beach 87,106 140.000 '0 rFort Lauderdale 186,076 120 000 Hallandale Beach 41,157 tQ Z Hillsboro Beach 1,986 100.000 CD D Hollywood 153,851 01 80,000 V 0 Lauderdale lakes 6,203 ~ V Lauderdale-by-the-Sea 36,647 60•000 i -s 0 Lauderhill 74,538 40.000 i _ 1 . 1111 C re lighthouse Point 30,499 _ 10 000 ' I I .O III Mrgate 58,714 136,007 4 lil • p St S � Ss b Mac ; kc;w 6yt Apo y North Lauderdale 44,855 �� t}`c�Ito gFo,i/? Alt1gt'T J�I,,' d`f/V° A��A 6a y; ,Q°i 0�r �et� ;V Oakland Park 44,2% d�a ol'e l t',0#4,F A�sY'�e51'�T' ' Q'`l'e ap,r° vs Hs 1 11 re Parkland 35,440 J, U' 40 ,� �1Y� �dS �, F CO Pembroke Park 6,222 , V` Pembroke Pines 170,857 'Open ■Non Exclusive •Exclusive Franchise r,City Plantation 92,628 Market Pompano Beach 113,144 - Southwest Ranches 7,675 Sunrise 97,359 Tamarac 72,509 Weston 68,305 Total Service by Population 371,767 58,714 1,324,978 172,559 1,928,018 ' Total I of Cities 3 1 21 3 28 i 10 Palm Beach County County Names Market Non Exclusive City Franchise SWA Zone 1-6 653,174 PALM BEACH COUNTY CITIES Belle Glade 16,893 Boca Raton 98,046 140,000 Boynton Beach 81,011 Delray Beads 66,948 120.000 Greenacres 44,549 rGulf Stream 949 Z Haverhill 2,193 100,000 N Highland Beach 4,300 CO D Juno Beach 3,862 80.000 r CD0 Us Jupiter 61,121 � V Lake Clarke Shores 3,562 • • Lake Park 9,039 �'0� I lake Worth Bead) 42,572 • O V Loxahatchee Groves 3,379 • --.1ao,aoa 0 W Mangonia Park 2,142 • North Palm Beach 13,167 Ca pan Ridge 1,828 20,000 . . C Pahokee 5,580 ' Palm Beach 9,253 - r I 1 s fa . I I I 1 . Q Palm Beach Gardens 59,755 t 15`,/ 6I j$`.61104-/,Jb Iis?/,6 jty 0 4.dh #81 4,07/ d Palm Beach Shores 1,330 _ 0 `,p40 c9'� 4.440 ° �5 y1 'of lc c �� ,.6'<>,p k 4,`,51 Royal Palm Beads 39,144 lb , F�` �} South Bay 4,924 �'� `S? ���a'\ Tequesta 6,152 ■Open ■Non Exclusive at Esdusive Franchise •City Wellington 61,768 Market West Palm Beach _ 119,255 Westlake 1,757 Total Service by Population 2,142 217,301 1,035,528 162,682 1,417,653 Chart exdudes SWA rSelld Waste Authority"zones 1.6 which has a population of 653,I74 and Is exclusive franchise. . Total#of Cities 1 2 P. 25 5 33 • 11 Other Florida Counties By Percentages _Other Counties - Open Market 6% City Non-Exclusive 25% co Cli co a Exclusive • 69% •Open Market •Non-Exclusive •Exclusive -City County Population SS of Cities Mkt Exclusive City Pinellas 964,416 25 3 12 10 Lee 776,995 10 0 9 1 Collier 382,680 4 0 3 1 Monroe 83,411 9 0 9 0 Totals 2,207,502 48 3 33 12 100% 6% 69% 2596 12 Other Florida Counties BY Population OTHER COUNTIES 500000 400000 300000 ID CD • ryCl 200000 CO . Q o 100000 N C a a t}i i • • I c� be, a4 \e5 00 ov eko Os ,oeb 9P Lea o'i ar o ae,e o t cr e`' o r r ac r o§ ee a r 0 s a s a r c Q 4 ` , e ° a e F Q e o t ' c o .Q, o . o 5 o ro o a ♦ Q 1 � C. � o y Q ♦ tQ° a f, c0 a a a s � �° ° e a J c a a e eC.°,e,�``°\5 +a Pe? c,0 Qe ..,°4, ya a s`Qo�a 0e a`..a`�0 ee`• ono� �0 cyr car ��0 ocOeO`aeeay°c0 cyr .ea 4b a`7a`Oe`e�rcyQi`e‘5�°cetia o c�0e eA �d`a�aa ��• �i a o` CP F �F c° �e e�\e C? an. o6. ,ec abe�4, QNo.4 k. tee �,rQ Qe Qe Q° as, x N� oI° co" 0° yea Jo`c Q 0 a`ac ` Qea Qea`Qeati ya �J yti yam' �a� ,kke�a`e �e�` �`a a'. `ea `c r °cQo awe °0 +° ,`cc Jc� J.4s. .1, •Open •Non Exclusive • Exclusive Franchise a City Market i 13 • Summary of Haulers with Exclusive Franchises HAULERS FOR CITIES WITH EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISES Marathon Advanced Coastal FCC Goode Keys Southern Republic Waste Waste County Exclusive Garbage Waste Pro Disposals Waste Environmental Company Sanitary Waste Seuices Connection Mgmt Sevice CD CD Miami-Dade 8 3 4 1 co Broward 21 2 3 10 6 Palm Beach 25 1 1 3 1 1 13 5 Pinellas 12 1 7 4 Lee 9 1 3 5 Collier 3 3 Monroe 9 1 1 4 3 Totals 87 3 3 3 1 1 4 1 4 10 40 17 %of 63% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 5% 1% S% 11% 46% 20% 14 • i•-••••*•!..4..44t.-A-- ,. .-•,,•„-,....; - .1 'l',rf-',,X,•:"•'? '•,••!'••. . •-,`••-••,•• '1.-14.-•,1'.‘i,1,:?-,•-•4*-4,...r-' ;:-.'• " r: •-'1.--.!'-'0. 1.-- •- ,• ..,''' .... '.• ‘..' '.. , 1, BEACH ...... . _ . RISING IP\ ABOVE ‘k ... I 4. . - AElli .- -mow- I _1 . . '-'"• . - .... .„ :.::: x• - - .., N, •••.%. •:••• . .. N 1 i:.::.... . .... \••• - •: .... . . '?- .-- -......, 6-. ."... .......... - -4e414f‘'-'`ia• 4 -... --... :2'1Z,\•:.:. A.., -.......- '•, ,,'',,(7.'-' AfrA01- '•,.- --".... -- o Thank you i 15 i