Loading...
LTC 013-2025 Injunction in Clevelander Ocean LP et al. v. City of Miami Beach et al.,MIAMI BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY and CITY MANAGER LTC# LETTER TO COMMISSION TO: FROM: DATE: Honorable Mayor Steven Meiner and Members of the City Commission Ricardo J.0...009ico,City Attorney and E)iy T,F City ManagertJtksCi January 9,202s " SUBJECT:Injunction in Clevelander Ocean LP et al.v.City of Miami Beach et al., Requiring Ocean Drive Reconfiguration The purpose of this Letter to Commission (LTC)is to advise you of the recent oral ruling by Judge Beatrice Butchko Sanchez in the case of Clevelander Ocean LP et al.v.City of Miami Beach et al.,Case No.2021-11642-CA-01 (11th Jud.Cir.)(the "Lawsuit"),requiring the City to return Ocean Drive between 5"Street and 14"Place to its pre-COVID-19 configuration. The plaintiffs in the Lawsuit are the owner of the Cleveland er hotel property,the operator of the Clevelander hotel (together with the owner,the "Clevelander Parties"),and the owner of the Essex House hotel.Among other claims,the Clevelander Parties allege in the Lawsuit that (1)the closure of Ocean Drive to vehicular traffic between 13 Street and 14"Place,and (2)the closure of Ocean Drive's northbound lane to vehicular traffic between 5 Street and 13"Street,are both unauthorized by Miami-Dade County (the "County")and therefore illegal.The Clevelander Parties therefore requested in the operative Complaint in the Lawsuit that the Court enter both a temporary and permanent injunction requiring Ocean Drive to be restored to its pre-COVID-19 condition. The City filed a Motion to Dismiss the operative Complaint,including the claims relating to the Ocean Drive configuration,arguing that those claims are barred by sovereign immunity,that the County had previously granted temporary permits for the closures,that the Clevelander Parties lack standing to enforce the County's traffic laws,and that the Clevelander Parties otherwise failed to state any plausible legal claim.The City was advised that the earliest Judge Butchko Sanchez could hear the Motion to Dismiss would be February 26,2025.Even though the Motion to Dismiss remains pending,the Clevelander Parties filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ("MPSJ")on the Ocean- Drive-related claims and unilaterally set it to be heard on January 8,2025.The City asked Judge Butchko Sanchez to wait to decide the MPSJ until after she could hear argument on the City's Motion to Dismiss,but Judge Butchko Sanchez denied that request and proceeded with the hearing on the MPSJ on January 8 013-2025 During the hearing,counsel for the Clevelander Parties presented deposition testimony from the County's corporate representative characterizing the road closures as "unsafe" and "unauthorized."Counsel for the Clevelander Parties also presented the letter (see attached)dated January 7,2025,from the County Department of Transportation and Public Works ("DTPW"),directing the City to "remove in a safe and controlled manner all barriers installed on,along,or nearby Ocean Drive which impede general vehicular traffic between 13 Street and 14 Place and Ocean Drive"and noting that "DTPW encourages the City to pursue a parallel application for the existing one-way condition on Ocean Drive from 5 Street to 14h Place ...[and]to pursue other concepts in the future in collaboration with DTPW to enhance pedestrianization and contextual urban design opportunities on Ocean Drive." Over the City's strenuous objection,Judge Butchko Sanchez orally granted the Clevelander Parties'MPSJ and declared she would be entering an injunction order requiring the City to "reopen"Ocean Drive between 5"Street and 14 Place no later than Wednesday,January 15,2025,at 5:00 p.m. Judge Butchko Sanchez is expected to enter a written order confirming her oral ruling sometime within the next few days,although she is not under any specific deadline to enter the order.We will keep you advised of this and related developments. It is imperative that whatever changes are made must be consistent with the safety standards and codes of the authority having jurisdiction,the DTPW.To that end,the City Attorney's Office and the City Administration are working diligently with the County on next steps and all possible avenues for an outcome that continues to provide safe transportation options for our residents,business owners and visitors,while complying with lawful mandates. ••&is@iii» January 7,2025 Department of Transportation and Public Works Office of the Director 701 NW 1st Court •17Floor Miami,Florida 33136 Eric Carpenter,P.E.,City Manager City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,FL 33139 RE:Ocean Drive Temporary Pedestrian Plaza (DR 2024002764) Dear Mr.Carpenter: Since our correspondence on August 23,2024,the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW)has been in close coordination with the City of Miami Beach (the "City")Department of Transportation in relation to the Ocean Drive pedestrian plaza that is currently in place along Ocean Drive between 13 Street and 14"place. Our staff has been monitoring the progress of the pedestrian plaza and has provided comments to City staff working to identify possible solutions to address the operational and safety issues identified with the subject closure to vehicular traffic of portions of Ocean Drive.The City has complied with all submission timelines stipulated in the letter;however,as of the date of this letter,the County has not given its final approval for the subject closure due to significant concerns regarding traffic operations and safety arising from the road closure.The closure of portions of Ocean Drive to vehicular traffic and re-routing of general traffic continues to be at the forefront of our concern.The County has identified and communicated with City staff regarding various safety hazards that are created by the City's closure of portions of Ocean Drive to vehicular traffic.By way of example,the closure of Ocean Drive to vehicular traffic between 13Street and 14"Place limits access for emergency vehicles to reach the surrounding area and creates several conflict points for pedestrians and motorists.The concerns with safety and traffic operations are further documented in the testimony from DTPW Traffic Engineering Division staff during deposition on the Clevelander Ocean LP filing (Case No.:2021-11642-CA-22). Pursuant to sections 2-95.1 and 2-96.1 of the Code of Miami-Dade County,the City is hereby directed to remove in a safe and controlled manner all barriers installed on,along,or nearby Ocean Drive which impede general vehicular traffic between 13"Street and 14place and Ocean Drive. By way of this letter,DTPW encourages the City to pursue a parallel application for the existing one-way condition on Ocean Drive from 5""Street to 14""Place as this concept was temporarily approved by DTPW with conditions that have not been met to date including a post-implementation traffic analysis of the one-way operation.The County also encourages the City to pursue other concepts in the future in collaboration with DTPW to enhance pedestrianization and contextual urban design opportunities on Ocean Drive. Should you have any questions or require additional information,please contact me at any time. Sincerely, Josiel ·errer-Diaz,P.E.,Interim Director and CEO Department of Transportation and Public Works c:Jimmy L.Morales,Chief Operating Officer,Miami-Dade County Miguel Soria,P.E.,Assistant Director,DTPW Yamilet Senespleda,P.E.,Chief of Traffic Engineering,DTPW