Resolution 2025-33513RESOLUTION NO.2025-33513
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA AND BROOKS +SCARPA ARCHITECTS,
INC.,FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE TO PROVIDE
UPGRADES TO STRING LIGHTS,TREE LIGHTING AND
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LPR CAMERAS,FOR THE 41ST STREET
CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION PROJECT,FOR A NOT TO EXCEED
AMOUNT OF$391,277.18.
WHEREAS,on September 2,2021,pursuant to the Request for Qualifications
(RFQ)No.2021-196-ND,the City Commission adopted Resolution No.2021-31838
approving and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with Brooks
+Scarpa Architects (B+S)for Architectural and Engineering Design Services,for the 41 st
Street Corridor Revitalization project in the amount of $1,664,012.62;and
WHEREAS,on March 29,2022,the City issued Notice to Proceed to B+S to start
the design of the Project,and prepared updated concept drawings,30%design
documents,which were compliant with the scope identified in the Conceptual Design;and
WHEREAS,on November 15,2022,the project received favorable support from
FOOT since the 41 st Corridor is state-owned road and requires their approval;and
WHEREAS,on July 5"2023 the 30%design documents were presented to the
Design Review Board (ORB)for advisory review and received a favorable
recommendation;and
WHEREAS,subsequent meetings with FOOT,at the 30%and 60%design
phases,yielded several comments warranting significant design changes,B+S prepared
updated 60%design documents incorporating comments received from the community,
neighborhood committees,City staff and FOOT;and
WHEREAS,on July 2,2024,the 60%Design Documents,reflecting the FOOT
requested design modifications were presented to ORB on an advisory basis,where they
provided favorable comments with recommendations,including;
•Explore utilizing other bright colors (besides Miami Beach pink)for the canopy
structures.
•Miami Beach pink is acceptable for the sidewalk pavement and furniture that
emerges from the sidewalk.
•Miami Beach pink sidewalks should have the same branding features as the gray
sidewalks
•Utilize the proposed canopy structures to provide shade
•Utilize the proposed canopy structures to call attention to and embrace the palm
trees or shade trees
•Option 2 regarding lighting (up and down light for every other Royal Palm tree)is
recommended
•Recommend increasing the number of shade trees and widening sidewalks,
including a reduction in the number of on-street parking
•Recommend signage be provided for navigation to adjacent parking garages and
surface lots.
•Although not in the existing scope,recommend replacing the existing acorn lamp
posts with a more contemporary type of lighting
•Explore relocating either the utility pole or Starchild art piece at Liebman Square,
as they conflict with each other;and
WHEREAS,staff requested direction from the City Commission on the additional
scope of work requested by ORB,the BID and Blue Ribbon Committee,which was not
included the original scope of work;and
WHEREAS,on December 11,2024,the City Commission adopted Resolution No.
2024-33446,approving the design for the 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization Project,
directing staff to include the up-lights at every other Royal Palm tree to light the fronds,
provide the electrical infrastructure for LPR cameras,include the replacement of the
temporary string lights with permanent string lights and the required permanent
infrastructure with the funding for the additional scope to be requested through the Fiscal
Year 2026 Capital Budget process;and
WHEREAS,B+S has submitted a negotiated proposal for the additional
Architectural and Engineering (NE)services to incorporate the additional scope directed
by the City Commission to add string lights at each palm with permanent infrastructure,
up lights at every other palm,infrastructure for LPRs,coordinate the PWD water main
replacement project with the corridor revitalization project,identify easements and
coordinate easement approval with affected property owners,and provide photometric
analysis of existing City and FOOT lighting along the corridor as requested by FOOT;and
WHEREAS,this Amendment No.1 includes the above additional NE services for
41 st Street Corridor Revitalization Project in the amount of $391,277.18;and
WHEREAS,City staff has reviewed the negotiated proposal for the additional
design,permitting,bidding and construction administration services and found it
reasonable for the effort required from the consultant;and
WHEREAS,this Amendment No.1 will revise the total contract amount to
$2,055,289.80.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA that the Mayor and City
Commission approve and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute
Amendment No.1 to the Agreement between the City Of Miami Beach,Florida And
Brooks +Scarpa for the provision of additional architectural and engineering services for
additional scope to provide upgrades to string lights,tree lighting and infrastructure for
LPR cameras,for the 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization Project,for a not to exceed
amount of$391,277.18.
PASSED and ADOPTED this _?@__day t _fer«y ,2025.
ATTEST:
MAR 0 3 2025
Rafael
Steven Meiner,Mayor
APPROVED AS TO
FORM &LANGUAGE
&FOR UTION
z8 /2ozs
Date
Resolutions -C7 B
MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
FROM:Eric Carpenter,City Manager
DATE:February 26,2025
TITLE:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THECITY OF
MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA AND BROOKS
+SCARPA ARCHITECTS,INC.,FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE TO
PROVIDE UPGRADES TO STRING LIGHTS,TREE LIGHTING AND
INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LPR CAMERAS,FOR THE 41ST STREET CORRIDOR
REVITALIZATION PROJECT,FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF$391,277.18.
RECOMMENDATION
The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission (City Commission)adopt
the Resolution.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
On September 2,2021,pursuant to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ)No.2021-196-ND,the
City Commission adopted Resolution No.2021-31838 approving and authorizing the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute an Agreement with Brooks +Scarpa Architects (B+S)for Architectural and
Engineering Design Services,for the 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization project (Project)in the
amount of $1,664,012.62.
On March 29,2022,the City issued Notice to Proceed to B+S to start the design of the Project.
B+S has worked to prepare updated concept drawings,and 30%design documents,compliant
with the scope identified in the Conceptual Design,and the conditions identified by the City
Commission.B+S along with City staff have conducted public engagement meetings and have
presented the Project to the Mayor's 41 st Street Blue Ribbon Committee (Blue Ribbon
Committee).The 41 st Street Corridor is a state-owned road and therefore,B+S initially submitted
schematic plans to FOOT on November 15,2022,and received favorable support for the Project.
The 30%design documents were presented to the Design Review Board (ORB)for advisory
review and received a favorable recommendation during the July 5,2023,ORB meeting.
Subsequent meetings with FOOT,at the 30%and 60%design phases,yielded several comments
warranting significant design changes.B+S prepared updated 60%design documents
incorporating comments received from the community,neighborhood committees,City staff and
FOOT.Many of the design elements previously proposed within the street portion of the right-of-
way,were rejected by FOOT during subsequent reviews and therefore removed from the scope
of work,and replaced with additional design elements along the corridor,as allowed,and at the
intersection of Pine Tree Drive and 41 st Street,at Lieberman Square.
In May 2024,the updated 60%design documents including the material changes,were submitted
for another round of review by City staff,FOOT and the ORB.
Page 377 of 1310
The Project includes design elements to enhance the pedestrian experience with new,widened
concrete sidewalks,the relocation of trees and hardscape or lighting that obstruct the pathway,
new fixed outdoor seating walls at four (4)mid-block locations,strategically placed bike racks,
alteration of limited on-street parking spaces to create more sidewalk area,planting of native
canopy trees with the required irrigation,incorporation of public art in the form of canopy structures
and gateway features,and the creation of a public space at the intersection of 41 st Street and
Pine Tree Drive,at Henry Liebman Square.
A separate and independent project,under the purview of Public Works (PWD),utilizing separate
funding,for the replacement of existing water transmission and distribution lines along 41 st Street
is currently in the permitting phase.To minimize disruptions to the community,CIP will manage
the construction of the utility replacement project,to occur concurrently with this Project.
On July 2,2024,the 60%Design Documents,reflecting the FOOT requested design modifications
were presented to ORB on an advisory basis,where they provided favorable comments with
recommendations.The ORB recommendations included the following:
•Explore utilizing other bright colors (besides Miami Beach pink)for the canopy structures.
•Miami Beach pink is acceptable for the sidewalk pavement and furniture that emerges
from the sidewalk.
•Miami Beach pink sidewalks should have the same branding features as the gray
sidewalks.
•Utilize the proposed canopy structures to provide shade.
•Utilize the proposed canopy structures to call attention to and embrace the palm trees or
shade trees.
•Option 2 regarding lighting (up and down light for every other Royal Palm tree)is
recommended.
•Recommend increasing the number of shade trees and widening sidewalks,including a
reduction in the number of on-street parking.
•Recommend signage be provided for navigation to adjacent parking garages and surface
lots.
•Although not in the existing scope,recommend replacing the existing acorn lamp posts
with a more contemporary type of lighting.
•Explore relocating either the utility pole or Starchild art piece at Liebman Square,as they
conflict with each other.
In consideration of ORB advisory review and recommendations,and input from the community,
the 41 st Street Business Improvement District (BID)and the Blue Ribbon Committee,staff
presented the 60%design documents to the City Commission,highlighting changes since the
approval of the AECOM conceptual design and additional scope that was not factored into the
initial project scope or budget.
Staff requested direction from the City Commission regarding the inclusion of additional scope as
the Project moves towards the 90%design.The additional scope of work requested by the
community,ORB,the BID and the Blue Ribbon Committee,includes:
•Replacement of the string lights,with permanent up and down lights,at every other palm
tree,and providing the appropriate electrical infrastructure.
•Providing infrastructure,including underground conduit for power and data,new service
racks in alley with associated panels and electrical service for nine (9)license plate
readers (LPR),as required by the Miami Beach Police Department.
•Replacing 44 existing city owned,acorn light fixtures and poles,with more contemporary
type of lighting.
Page 378 of 1310
ANALYSIS
On December 11,2024,the City Commission adopted Resolution No.2024-33446,approving the
design for the 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization Project,directing staff to include the up lights at
every other Royal Palm tree to light the fronds,and providing the electrical infrastructure for LPR
cameras.They also directed staff to include the replacement of the temporary string lights with
permanent string lights with the required permanent infrastructure.The City Commission did not
accept the ORB recommendation to replace the acorn light fixtures with a more modern light
fixture.Funding for the additional scope will be requested through the Fiscal Year 2026 Capital
Budget process.
B+S has submitted a negotiated proposal for the additional Architectural and Engineering (AVE)
services to incorporate the additional scope directed by the City Commission in resolution 2024-
33446.The proposal also includes services required to coordinate the PWD water main
replacement project with the corridor revitalization project,identify easements and coordinate
easement approval with affected property owners,and for photometric analysis of existing City
and FOOT lighting along the corridor as requested by FOOT.
This Amendment No.1(Exhibit A)includes the above additional A/E services for the 41st Street
Corridor Revitalization Project in the amount of $391,277.18.The total revised contract amount
is $2,055,289.80.
City staff has reviewed the negotiated proposal for the additional design,permitting,bidding and
construction administration services and found it reasonable for the effort required from the
consultant.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
The total Amendment is for a not-to-exceed amount of $391,277.18,subject to the approval of
the fourth capital budget amendment to the FY 2025 Capital Budget.
Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate?
(FOR ORDINANCES ONLY)
If applicable,the Business Impact Estimate (BIE)was published on:
See BIE at:https://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/meeting-notices/
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
$391,277.18 Subject to approval of the fourth capital budget amendment to the FY 2025 Capital
Budget.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends that the City Commission approve the resolution.
Applicable Area
Middle Beach
Page 379 of 1310
Is this a "Residents Right to Know"item,
pursuant to City Code Section 2-17?
Yes
Is this item related to a G.0.Bond
Project?
Yes
Was this Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which,as defined in Code Sec.2.481,
includes a principal engaged in lobbying?No
If so,specify the name of lobbyist(s)and principal(s):
Department
Capital Improvement Projects
Sponsor(s)
Cg-sponsor(s)
Condensed Title
Execute Amendment 1,PSA for 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization Project.GIP
Previous Action (For City Clerk Use Only)
Page 380 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT NO.1
TO
TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF NIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA AND
BROOKS +SCARPA ARCHITECTS,INC.
DATED,MARCH 15,2022
FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING
SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE ro PROVIDE UPGRADES TO STRING
LIGHTS,TREE LIGHTING AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LPR CAMERAS,FOR A
NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $391,277.18
This Amendment No,1to the Agreementis made and entered this day of
2025,by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BACH,a municipal corporation existing under the
laws of the State of Florida (the "City"),having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center
Drive,Miami Beach,Florida 33139,and BROOKS +SCARPA ARCHITECTS,INC.,a Florida
Corporation,having its principal office at 1147 NE 7W Avenue,Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304
"Contractor"),
RECITALS
WHEREAS,on September 2,2021,pusuant to the Request for Qualifications (RFQ)No.
2021-196-ND,the City Commission adopted Resolution No.2021-31838 approving and authorizing
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with Brooks +Scarpa Architects (B+S)for
Architectural and Engineering Design Services,for the 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization project in
the amount of $1,664,012.62;and
WHEREAS,on March 29,2022,the Cityissued Notice to Proceed to B+S to start the design
of the Project,and prepared updated concert drawings,30%design documents,which were
compliant with the scope identified in the Conceptual Design;and
WHEREAS,on November 15,2022,the roject received favorable support from FDOT since
the 41 st Corridor is state-owned road and requires their approval;and
WHEREAS,on July 5"2023 the 30%design documents were presented to the Design
Review Board (ORB)for advisory review and received a favorable recommendation;and
WHEREAS,subsequent meetings with [DOT,at the 30%and 60%design phases,yielded
several comments warranting significant design changes,B+S prepared updated 60%design
documents incorporating comments received from the community,neighborhood committees,City
staff and FOOT;and
WHEREAS,on July 2,2024,the 60%Design Documents,reflecting the FOOT requested
design modifications were presented to ORB or an advisory basis,where they provided favorable
comments with recommendations,including;
•Explore utilizing other bright colors (besices Miami Beach pink)for the canopy structures.
•Miami Beach pink is acceptable for the sidewalk pavement and furniture that emerges from
the sidewalk.
•Miami Beach pink sidewalks should have the same branding features as the gray sidewalks
•Utilize the proposed canopy structures tc provide shade
Page 381 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
•Utilize the proposed canopy structures o call attention to and embrace the palm trees or
shade trees
•Option 2 regarding lighting (up and fown light for every other Royal Palm tree)is
recommended
•Recommend increasing the number of shade trees and widening sidewalks,including a
reduction in the number of on-street parkng
•Recommend signage be provided for navgation to adjacent parking garages and surface lots,
•Although not in the existing scope,reconmend replacing the existing acorn lamp posts with
a more contemporary type of lighting
•Explore relocating either the utility pole or Starchild art piece at Liebman Square,as they
conflict with each other;and
WHEREAS,staff requested direction fr011 the City Commission on the additional scope of
work requested by ORB,the BID and Blue Ribton Committee,which was not included the original
scope of work;and
WHEREAS,on December 11,2024,the City Commission adopted Resolution No.2024-
33446,approving the design for the 41 st Street Corridor Revitalization Project,directing staff to include
the up-lights at every other Royal Palm tree to liht the fronds,provide the electrical infrastructure for
LPR cameras,include the replacement of the tenporary string lights with permanent string lights and
the required permanent infrastructure with the funding for the additional scope to be requested
through the Fiscal Year 2026 Capital Budget precess;and
WHEREAS,B+S has submitted a negaiated proposal for the additional Architectural and
Engineering (NE)services to incorporate the alditional scope directed by the City Commission to
add string lights at each palm with permanet infrastructure,up lights at every other palm,
infrastructure for LPRs,coordinate the PWD Nater main replacement project with the corridor
revitalization project,identify easements and ccordinate easement approval with affected property
owners,and provide photometric analysis of exsting City and FOOT lighting along the corridor as
requested by FOOT;and
WHEREAS,this Amendment No.1 inclules the above additional A/E services for 41 st Street
Corridor Revitalization Project in the amount of $391,277.18;and
WHEREAS,City staff has reviewed tte negotiated proposal for the additional design,
permitting,bidding and construction administraion services and found it reasonable for the effort
required from the consultant
WHEREAS,this Amendment No.1will revise the total contract amount to $2,055,289.80.
1.ABOVE RECITALS
The above recitals are true and ccrect and are incorporated as a part of this
Amendment No.1.
2.MODIFICATIONS
(a)The Agreement is amened,as provided he rein and in Schedule "A"
attached hereto.
(b)In consideration for the sevices to be performed under this Amendment No.
1,City shall pay Consultant the not-toexceed amount of $391,277.18 as provided in
Schedule "B",attached hereto,
Page 382 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
3.OTHER PROVISIONS.
All other provisions of the Agreement,as amended,are unchanged and shall remain in full
force and effect.
4.RATIFICATION.
The City and Consultant ratify the terms of the Agreement,as amended by this
Amendment No.1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No.1 to be executed
in their names by their duly authorized official as of the date first set forth above.
ATTEST:
EricCarpenter,City Manager
Rafael E.Granado,City Clerk
ATTEST:
Secretary
Print Name
CONSUL TANT:
Brooks +Scarpa Architects,Inc.
President
Prirt Name
Page 383 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
SCHEDULE A
BROOKS 4SCARPA
Jan 28,2025
Attn:
Colette Satchell
Senior Project Manager
Capital Improvement Projects Office
1700 Convention Center Drive,
Miami Beach,FL 33139
305.673.7071
ColetteSatchell@miamibeachfl.gov
Herman Fung
Project Manager
Capital Improvement Projects Office
1700 Convention Center Drive,
Miami Beach,FL 33139
305.673.7071
HermanFung@miamibeachfl.gov
Re:Additional Scope for the 41st Street Revitalization Projct (21015.0)
Dear Colette and Herman,
1147 NE 7TH AVENUE
FORT LAUDERDALE,FL
333041T.(954)683 1236
Brooks+Scarpa requests additional funds to include additical scope in the project as requested.This request will
cover the cost of incorporating the additional scope into the project costs under the current scope of work.The
following are the scope of work items that are included in tte project scope:
1)Additional FOOT Permitting Requirements
•Grading analysis,as requested by FOOT.
o FDOT did not permit the design tam to modify drainage patterns in the corridor,which led
to extraordinary coordination anl redesign to achieve the required grading.
•Identification of required easements and reparation of easement package for CMB and FDOT's
use/reference.
•Preparation of electric lighting point-by-pint calculations for existing street lighting as requested by
FOOT.The purpose of the photometric cal:ulations is to demonstrate to FOOT that the proposed
trees will not adversely affect the existing ighting illumination.The lighting consultant will only
perform photometric calculations at isolat!d conflict locations.
o Includes ongoing communicationwith FOOT to gather technical information related to
existing conditions and approvedlighting standards.
2)Additional lighting scope
•Consideration of upgrading pede trian lighting to more modern fixtures involved updating
renderings and preparing a prelininary ROM cost for the upgraded pedestrian light.Note:
The City of Miami Beach Commision ultimately vetoed the upgraded fixture and decided to
keep the current acorn light.
•Installation of permanent string lght fixtures and the infrastructure to make string lights on
every Royal Palm Tree in the corrdor permanent.
1of 3
Page 384 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
SCHEDULE A
•Installation of Uplights as directe!by the City Commission
3)Incorporation of LPRs
•FDOT advised infrastructure for LPRs shoud be incorporated at this stage.However,the LPR
equipment will be installed under a future permit.The following tasks will be required for the future
LPR permit:
•Scope per Miami Beach Police:
1.Provide a set of plans signed andsealed for the FDOT permit.
2.Design team to review locations ,f the LPRs within the Right of Way as defined in FDOT
guidelines.
3.Design of the LP Rs to include thefollowing:
a.Empty Conduit:
b.Handholes
c.Pole's base
d.Pole's details
e.Pole's wind loal calculation
f.Panel Schedule
g.LPR Enclosure pecs (to be provided by MBPD)
h.License Plate Rader Camera Detail (to be provided by MBPD)
4.Assist the City through the genenl use permit process as defined in FOOT guidelines.
5.MBPD will provide a formal letterrequesting the installation of LPRs in this project and
authorizing the design team as He individual to submit the permit application on behalf of
the City.
4)Interweaving the concurrent water main utilityproject.
•Interweaving and coordinating the concurently running utility project as we go from 60%to
Closeout.
Reviewing plans from the water main projct,coordinating site features,and adjusting drawings as
required
•Excludes water main project under Steinberg bridge.
5)Additional Meetings
•Includes 10 meetings
6)Survey
•Perform updates to the survey at the 90%Design Phase.
o The surveyor will update and revse the previous survey to accurately reflect any changes or
removal of significant aboveground improvements within the survey limits.
Page 385 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
SCHEDULE A
Financial Allocation
We are requesting $376,277.18 as additional funds for the iems listed above,plus a not-to-exceed fee of $15,000 for
any required meetings which are not included in our curren contract.See Exhibit B for the proposed allocation of
funds.
Tota l Finan ci al Alloc ation Su m m ary
Task Funds
Proposed Additional Service (Items 1-6 above)$376,277.18
Anticipated additional meetings (10 meetings)$15,000.00 (Not to exceed)
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Huber,FAIA,ASLA,NCARB,LEEDap,WEDG,Principal Brooks+Scarpa Architects
CC:Isabella Pedrosa,Project Designer,Brooks +Scarpa Archtects
Page 386 of 1310
EXHIBIT ASUMMARY
NOTES £XHIT
rooks +Scarpa Archtiects,Inc.ANHOUR ESTI MATES (Additional Services]
1147 NE 7h Ave.1015041:Street Corridor evtalzaten Project
Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304 dtnai Scope
Office (954)683-1236 REV January I4,2025
$TANTEC.,BROOKS +SCARPA,HLBA,MASU EN,LONGITU DOt
I
Senior I I I9roe¢t Project Senior Senior Landscape Senior CA D/CAO/drnun
rcpa'Marater Architect Eguree Architect Technician I Designer !Techrca Assistant Ts Tota'iI$200.0 $174.00 !$165.00 $165.00 $165.00 $125.00 !$113.00 $70 02 I $44.56
6ox pun porersand Perretibeitta
Additioral FDOT Permitting Requirements +outs 63 144 6 50 35 100 183 80 I 4
Rate $12.600 00 $25.056 00 $990.00 I $8.250 00 $5,775.00 $12,500.00 $20,679 00 $5,601 60 I $17824 $91,629.84
Additional Lighting Scope Hours 27 145 10 75 10 65 75 50
Rate $5,400.00 $25,230 .00 $1.650 00 $12,375.00 $1,650 00 $8,125.00 $8.475.00 !$4,201 20 sooo $67,106.20 I
Incorporation of PRs Scope +ours 36 104 10 35 65 45 40
Rate $7,200 00 $18.096.00 $1.550.00 $5.775 00 $0.00 $8,125.00 $5,085.00 $2,800 80 $0 00 $48,731.80
Coordinating Utityroget outs 8 18 I
See rotes in individual consultant fee breakdown i Ratel $1.600.00 $3,132.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 '$0 00 $0.00 ,$0.00 $4,732.00
Additiorat Meers +urs ID 7 I I I l 'See notes n indidual consultant fee breakdown Rate $2.000.00 $1,218.00 $0 00 $165 00 I $0 00 $125.00 I $0.00 $70.02 I SO DO $3,578.02
TOTAL $215,777.86
90%DesinDocurents
Additional DOT Permuting Requirements Hours l I I
Rate 50 00 $0 00 $000 $0 00 I $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 I
Additional Lighting Scope ours 12 80 10 10 I ID 10 I 100 50 2
I I !I I
I I
See rotes n individual consultant fee breakdown .J $2.400 00 $13.920.00 $1.650.00 I $1.650.00 $1.650.00 $1,250.00 $11,300.00 $3,501 00 $s9 12 I $37.410.12 II
Incorporation f (PR5 5cope +ours 6 20 30 5 31 18 I
Rate $1,200 .00 $3,480 00 $0 00 $4,950 00 $0.00 $625 00 $3,503.00 ;51.26036 I $0.00 $15,018.36
Cordinating t it rot H U TS 9 30 30 5 59 18 I 2
Rate $1.800.0 $5.220.00 $0.00 $4,950.00 $0 00 $625.00 $6,667 00 $1.260 36 I $89.12 s 20.611.48
Addition al Meetings Hours I
Rate $0.00 $0 00 I $0 00 $0 00 50.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00
Survey /Survey Coordnaton Hours 16 I 103 6.2 7 I I
See notes in indiduai consultant fee breaidown Rate $3.200.00 $17.922.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $715.00 $791 00 I $0 00 sooo $22,688.00
TOTAL]$95,727.96
1,Ceesttrutie pout3,gin
Additiorai DOT oermittinz Req uirements tours I I
Rate 0 D D 0 0 0 0 D I 0 I
Additional Lighting Scooe Hours ID 2s 15 20 35 I I
Rate $2.000 00 $4,350 00 $2,475 00 I $0 00 $3,300 00 $0 00 I $3.955.00 $0.00 I $44 .56 $16,124.56
incor po ra t on of 1PRs 5cope +ours 5 16 18 20 I 2
Rate $1.000 00 $2,784.00 $0.00 $2,970.00 $0.00 $0 00 $2,260 00 $0 00 i $89.12 $9,103.12
Coo rd ina ti n g Utility Proj ect ours 4 16 18 34 I
Rate $800.00 $2,784 00 $0 00 $2,97000 $0.00 I $0.00 $3,842.00 $0 00 i $0.00 $10,396.00
Additional Meetings +our$I
ate $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 I $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00
TOTI $35,623.68
Construction drinistratlion
Ad dition al FDgT erm uti ng Req uirements Hour's I
Rate $0 00 sooo $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 i $0.00 $0.00
Additional Lig hti n g Scope Hours 3 10 6 I I
a te $600 00 $1,740.00 $0.00 I $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $678 00 I $0 00 544 56 I $3,062.56
ncororation gt P Rs Sope Hours 5 35 18 26 I 2
Rate $1,000.00 $6,090 .00 $0 00 $2,970 00 $0.00 $0 00 I $2,938 00 !$0.00 $89.12 $13,087.12
Coordinating Utility Project +ou rs 5 35 18 26
Rate $1,000 00 $6,090 00 $0 00 $2.970.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,938.00 I $0.00 !$0.00 '$12,998.00
Addition3 Meetings Hours
Rate $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 0 00 $0.00 $0.20 $0.00 $0.00
Survey /Survey Coordination +lour$C D D I
Rate $$0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 !$0 00 $0.00
TOTAI $29,147.6a
SCHED ULE A
STANT,ROOKS +SCARPA,HS,MASUrN,owGrruor rorA/_$37627.1s ]
Page 387 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
B+S
SCHEDULE A
/NO TEs ROOKS +SCARPA
I
I I Senor IIocPro)et Ser.or Senwor Landscape Seno A0DOI CAD!Air.n
r rc ii Mara?e Arzu?et t nee I Ar"tet I Ihm€9 Desue T"nan Ass+stat as«"0al
$200¢I $17400 5165.30 $165.00 $165.00 $12500 5113.00 570.02 $44 55
Den Duetsand Perrott $btta I
Additional DOT eerur.g eq unerems]+our 29 45 6 I 35 I I 119 !I I
Rate $5.8000 $7,830 00 $99000 S000 $5,775 00 I $0 00 $13,447 20 i 50 00 $44 56 $33,886 56
Additional Lighting Sc0el Hut 10 so 10 I 10 I I I I
a;e $2.000 O $8.700 00 $1,550.00 $0 00 $1,650 00 I S000 I $0 00 s0 00 $0.00 $14,000 .00
incorporaton ot 1?Rs 5ope]Hour 16 59 iO I I I I
i Rate $1,200O $10,266.00 $1.550.00 50 00 S000 S000 I S000 I 0 00 I 50 00 $15.116.00
ekde2 hours tr ccorcapon meet"ztrproe:rs,Coord ratng tit Pro»et ]Hu 10 I I I I
rdudes tour for ianreewtoroo,ecncal,Hu0es 2 I
I I Itourstorcoordinationmeetgfoeprojectmanager,induces 8 I Itoursftpareview,coordination ad adreegtv asks for
roe!r31age Ratel $600 ¢$174000 $O 00 S000 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 50 00 s0 00 $2.340 .00
ddrt oral Meetinas l Hours l I 5 I I I I
I !I !II±des hours fr past cord.naun reetrgs Rae $1.0000 $870 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 50 00 $0 00 $1,870.00
TOTAL $67,212.56
94DeDocents
Add itional Da T rutting Requ iremen ts]Mou$I I I I I
I Rate I I I I I I
+nudes burs'or coordrarng add:9lgtg ope /tr'g ddtonat Lt Scope'Hour I 20 10 I 10 I I 20 I I
gets,@etas.oorcirw.iggtsserent att 2d :a I I I2enudedtoacheeerequiredfight/eeis n corridor,I I I
f.ng au-iht placement ate $400.¢$3.480.00 $1.650.00 $0.00 $1,552 00 $0.00 $2.260 00 $0 00 $44 56 $9,484.56
Incorportaton of PRs Sco pel Houts I I I I
I ate]I I !
ordnatg ttrty Project]Hour 2 I 14 I I
ate $400 ¢$1.044 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 50 00 I $1,582 00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,026.00
Additional Meetings ]Hur 0 0 I I I
I Rate $0 0 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 I $0.00 I 50 00 !$0.00 $0.00
Sue or .ration]Hou!$1 I 7 !I
I Rate $200.¢$52200 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 sooo I $791.00 I 50.00 I sooo $1,513.00
TOTAI $14,023.56
Let.ruction Doesd tiding
Additional +DOT ermttn Requirements Hour$I I I
!ate I 0 I I
Addtoat Lignting Scooe]Hur3 10 25 15 20 I 15 I I l
I Rate $2,000 O $4,350 00 $2,475.00 i $0 00 $3.300 00 sooo $3,955 00 $0 00 '$4456 $16,124.56
incorportaton of Rs Sco pe]Houts I I I
I Rate 5400 $1.044 00 50 00 50 00 $0 00 0 00 50 00 sooo 50 00 $1,444 .00
Coordrating Utility Project Houri 6 I 14 I I 1 I
3te $400 0 $1.044 00 $O 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 I $1.582.00 $0.00 I $0.00 $3,026.00 t
Addit ion.gt Mtin «Hours 0 0 I 0 I I I
Rate $0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 S000 I $0 00 I sooo I $0.00
TOTAL]$20,594.56
netrueten heinitration
Additional OT errvrting Requirements]Hur I I I I I
I Rate 0 0 50 00 $0 00 $0 00 I $0.00 50 00 I $0 00 !$0 00 I $0 00 I
dtoral LghtScopel Hour i 3 10 I I I I I
I Rate S600¢$1.74000 $0 00 50 00 $000 $0 00 $67 00 $000 $4456 1 $3,062.56
rcorporation of LPRs $0e]Hur$25 I I I I
3te $5000 $4350 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 I $67 00 $0 00 $0 30 $5.628.00
Coo rdinating Utlty Project ]Hours 3 I 25 I 6 I I
I Rate $600.0 I $4.350.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 sooo I $678.00 I $0.00 I s0.00 $5,628.00 I
Ad drton at Meet inasl Hu t5 I I I I I
I Rate $0 9 I 50 00 $0 00 $0 00 S000 $0 00 I $0 00 50 00 $0 00 $0.00
TOTAL $14,318.56 I
s+s AroA scot TOTAL[_$11619.24_
Page 388 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
STANTEC
SCHEDULE A
STANTEC
I 5erg I IroyetPro,ect Senior Senor Landscape Seo CA0 /CAI Admin,I
is.pa Ma-aper Arch tect #rg.reer Ar0te Technician Designer 7ehrcian Ass·stat as«Tatal
I $200.0 $174.00 $165.00 I $165.00 $165.00 $125.00 $113.00 I $70.02 I $44.56
0 DeanDeetsand Perritt tittad
ddiugal FDOT emitting Recuirerents Hou rs 30 80 50 100 0 80 l
ate $6.000 .0 $13,920.00 $0.00 $8.250 00 $0.00 $12,500 00 $0.00 $5.601.60 S44.56 $46,316.16
Additional Ligh ting Scope Hor3 15 85 75 65 50 60
3ate $3.000 0 $14,790 00 $0 00 $12.37500 $0 00 $8,125 00 $5 650 00 $4,201 20 50 00 $48,141.20 I
Incorporation of {Rs SOpe Hours 20 45 35 65 45 40 I
ate $4.0000 $7,830.00 $0 00 $5.715.00 $0.00 $8.125.00 $5.085.00 $2,800 80 $0.00 $33,615.80
ngge 2 o rs for coordinator reet.gr proect ordinating tutu#sty pro Hours I
prinopai,tncdudes 3 hour for plan revoew tor project Ipncpal,Includes 10 /curs tr plan revew,coordraton
and2gmsate tasis tor roe maier 8ate $1.000 .0 $1.392.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 50.00 50 00 5000 $2,392.00
Ad dition3i Meeting;Hour I I
des tors 'or as cord utin meetings ate $1,000 0 $348.00 $0.00 $165.00 50.00 $123.00 $0.00 $7002 $0 00 I $1,708.02
To0Tau/$132,173.1
90%penDoreen
dd onai #DO T er ring Requirere nts]Hour I I
ate I
Coordinatrg 'ght p'acem ent with 3ddtinl scope induded Additional Lighting Sco pe Hours I 10 10
to acheiewe required ght'eve's in corridor.fr3iing upo
lght'aceme t Rate $0 00 $0 00 50 00 I $1,650 00 S000 $1.250 00 sooo 50 00 $0.00 $2,900.00
corporation of Ps 5cope Hou'20 I 30 31 18
ate $1,200.0 $3.480.00 $0 00 $4.950.00 $0.00 $625.00 $3,503.00 $1,260.36 $0.00 $15,018.36
ordinating Utility Project Hours 6 20 JO 5 l1 1 l
3ate $1,2000 $3,480 00 $0 00 I $4,950 00 $0 00 $623.00 $3,50 3.00 $1,260.36 $44 56 s 15,062.92
Additional Mt Hours I I
8ate I c
roru $32,981.28
10i,ttrtieom Douet
Additional #DOI Permitting Requirements Houf1
9ate
Additional Light ing Scope Hours
ate 0
Insration of {s 5ope Hours 3 10 1s 20
ate $600.0 $1.740.00 $0.00 $2,970 00 $0 00 $0 00 $2,260.00 $0 00 $89 12 $7,659.12
Coordinating ulty Pro;ect Hour 2 10 18 20
Rate $400 0¢$1.740 00 5000 $2.970 00 $0 00 $000 $2,260 00 $0 00 $0 00 I $1,370.00
Additiona l Meeti ngs Hours
ate $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00ror,$15.029.12
anatrotie dtitrton
Addrt onat F DOT Permitting Requirements Hours
ate
Additional Lighting Scope Hours
Rate
Incorporation of [PRs 5ope Houf$10 1s 20
ate $400 0€$1,740.00 $0 00 I $2.970.00 50.00 $0.00 52,260.00 $0 00 $8912 $7,459.12
ordinatint utility Project Hou rs 10 I 18 20 I
2ate $400 0C $1,740.00 $0 00 I $2,970 00 $0 00 $0.00 $2.260 00 $0.00 I $7,370.00
Additional Meeti ngs Hour 0 I I I
ate $200 0Cc I $0 00 $0 00 I $0 00 5000 $0.00 $0 00 5$0 00 $0 00 $0.00 I
TOTA,$14,429.12 I
sNTtcAoorTO NA scot TOTAL'_$19s,012.70'
Page 389 of 1310
EXHIBIT A
HLB
SCHEDUIE A
NOTS Ht8
I nrec
ADDI
es ne'ass 'Adrr.
52000 $174 3 $165 00 5165 00 $165 00 5125 00 $11300 570 02 $44 56
Add tori $QI ermiring Rarere nts +curs/3 15
ate,$60a0 $2,610.00
Additional lighting Scape{Hout 10
3ute $4000 $1.740 30
ncorporatvon ofRs Scope Hours
8ate
Additional Meetings.Hours/
I
$0.00 50.00 $0 00 I 5000
I
50 00 $0 00 $0 00 I $0 00
I
I I
I I
I 'I I
I
50
$5.650.00 50 00
25
52,825 00 50 00
I'
I I
0 I 0 I
80 I 50 I
$9.040.00 $3.501 00 I
I
I
54455 $8,904.56
I
$0 00 $4,965.00 'I
I
TOTAL,$13.099.$6 I
0%Deign Duree
Adt/tori FD0T ermttinz Reauirerents ou rs
In€lades hours fer detailing additional hghting cope (string lights).daioagmimggo]jtlI"lilmin=itll
and coordinating detats wth ahtect,adys!gntpaerent [l
ah2ddrionat scencdedtoachreera,red kgtie/«
rrdor,fnalzzu zhtpiacement at¢
nc orpor ation 3f 1R s Scope Hour
Cord/raging Utility Project Hours]
I I
0 I 0 I
1€60 I!
$2.0000 $10.440 00 I 50 00
I
I
ate'
dd torat Meetings{+oursi
I
I
I
I
$0.00 $0 00 !3 00
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
$4456 $25,025.56I I
I
I
I
TOTAL}$25.025.56
,{trtiDotg.lg
Add.tiara!$DOT gritting Requirements Hours I
I
corportaton of Ls Scope Hours
?ate
Coordinating Uti ty Project +ours
ate
ate/
T0TAU $0.00
onestrctee diitrtie
Mo anti¢uti additiona l so oe.
Attonz FDf perm ute Pequirren ts Hurt
ate
Ado /tuna /tghting Scopel ou rs
incorportation af Rs Scope Hour
ordnatn tilt rot ors
ate I
Add ion 2/Meet ing s ou rs I I I
ate I
TOTA}$0 00 [
HgAOtTIONALsc0 TOTAL]_$38.995_12
Page 390 of 1310
SCHEDUIE A
EXHIBIT A
MASUEN
MASU EN NOTES
Senior
Project Project Sen.or Senior Landscape Senior CAD /CAD/Ad min.
inc pal Manager Architect ngineer Architect Technician Designer Technician Assistant 1ask Total
$200.0 $174.0 $165.0 165.00 $165.00 $125.00 Slll.00 $70.02 $44.56
609 Din Dcurents and Permit Submittal
Additional FDOT Permitting Requirements Hours 1 4 14 I
Rate $200.00 $696.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $1.582.00 $0.00 $44.56 $2,522.56
Additional Lighting Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incorportation of Rs Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coordinating Utility roiect Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Additional Meetings Htours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAi $2,522.56
90%Design Documents
Additional FDOT Permitting Requirements Hours
Rate
Additional Lighting Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incorportation of LPRs Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coordinating Utility Project Hours I 4 14 I
Rate 5200.00 $696 00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $1,582.00 SO 00 $44.56 $2,522.56
Additional Meetings Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAi $2,522.56
100%ConstructionDocumentsA,idding
Additional FDOT Permitting Requirements Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Additional Lighting Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incorporation ofRS Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coordinating Utility Project Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No anticpa ted
Additional Meetings Hours additional
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 scope.
TOTAL $0.00
Construction Administration
Additional FDOT Permitting Requirements Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Additional Lighting Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incorportation of PRs Scope Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coordinating Utility Project Hours
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No anticpa ted
Additional Meetings Hours additional
Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $cope.
TOTAL $0.00
MASU EN ADDITIONAL SCO PE TOTAL]_$5045.12
Page 391 of 1310
SCHEDULE A
EXHIBIT A
LONGITUTDE SURVEYOR
NOTES /LONGTUoE
I I I I I I l St!nior l l i IroetProjc!Senior Se/v0 Senior ADO/CAI Adm.,I I
re al Maae I rte.inree z Tehrwcan Jene I Iehrc.an i A865tat [as«Iota II$200.0 i $174.00 I $165.00 I $165.00 7 $165.00 I $125.00 $113.00 I $70.02 544.56
0,Due Dents and Perrett Stat
Survey]Hours I l 1 7 I l I I I I
Mo antic.pated additional scope.I Ratel 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 3 I 0 I
TOTAL $0.00
90,n.a Doceti
Survey]+ours 15 I 100 I I I I 62 I I I I
$13.825 0 sill not bied from oredes chase I Ratel $3.000.00 ls17.4oooo l $0 00 50.00 I $0.00 I 5775 00 I $000 I $0 00 I $0.00 I $21,175.00
TOTA]$21,175.00
100%,Cottruction DOocurents #Aildi
sunwed Hoursl I I I T 1 I I I I
Mo anti€pated additional scope.I Ratel 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 7 0 I 0 I 0 :0 0 I
TOTAL!$0.00
Construction Atr vi ation
Survey!Hoursl 0 I 0 I I I I I 0 I I IIRatel5000I$0 00 I $0 00 I 50.00 I $0.00 I $0 00 l $0.00 I $0 00 I 50.00 I $0.00
Tora!$0.00
owGrruotoorowt scot TOTAL]$21,175.00I
Page 392 of 131 O
SCHEDULE B
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY
NOTES ExHuT
rooks +Scarpa Archtiects,Inc.NHOUR ESTIMATES {Additional Series }
1147 NE 7th Ave.1015241st Street Cardo ?es.ta'/zatuon ?roe"
Fort Lauderdale,FL 33304 dtonal 5ope
O#le (954)683-1236 8Ev January 14,2025
STANTEC,ROOKS +SCARPA ,HLA,MASUEN,LON GITU DE
Senor I
roe?Project Senor 5e 10°Landscape Senor CA!CADOI 4drin.
ria l Marage Architect nginee Architect Technician esigner Tech«ciar Assistant Task Total
$200.00 $17400 $165.00 $165 00 I $165.00 $125.00 $113.00 $7002 I $44 56 I
609,pg Dotts arid hermit Submittal
ddtonat #DOT Permitting Requirements +ours 63 144 s so 35 100 183 80 4
ate $12.600.00 $25,056.00 $990.00 $8.250 00 $5,775.00 $12,500.00 $20.679.00 $5.601.60 $178 24 $91,629.84
Additional ghtirg Scope ours 27 145 10 75 10 65 75 60
ate $5,400 00 $25,230 00 $1.550 00 $12.375.00 $1.650.00 $8,125.00 $8,475300 $4,201.20 $0 00 $67,106.20
ncorportaton of Rs Soe ours 36 104 10 35 65 45 40
ate $1.200 00 $18,096.00 $1,65000 $5,775.00 $000 $8,125 00 $5,085.00 $2.800 80 $0.00 $48,731.80
Coordinating Utility ?roe ours 8 18
Sects in ind.dual onslta:he rdwn ate $1.600.00 53,132 00 $0.00 $0 00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000 $0.00 $4,732.00
Additional Meetings +lour$10 7 1 1 1
See oes in inddual consultant fee breakdown ate $2.000.00 $1,218 00 $000 $165.00 $0 00 $125 00 $0.00 $70.02 $0.00 $3,578.02
TOTI $215,777.96
90%tun currents
Additional OT ermniting Requirements +our
ate 0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 5000 $0 00 SO 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00
Additional Lighting Scooe ours 12 80 10 10 10 10 100 so 2
See rotes in rd»dual consultant fee re2down 8at¢$2,400 00 $13,920.00 $1.650 00 51.650.00 $1,650.00 $1.250.00 $11,300.00 $3,501 00 $89 12 $37,410.12
Ineorpo rtaton ot PR Scope tours 6 20 30 s 31 18
ate $1.200.00 $3,480.00 $0.00 $4,950.00 $0 00 $625 00 $3,503.00 $1.260.36 $0.00 $15,018.36
Coordinating Utiiitv Project +ours 9 30 30 5 $9 18 2
ate $1.$00 00 $5,22000 $0.00 $4.950.00 0 00 $625 00 $6,667 00 $1.250 36 $89 12 $20,611.48
Add:tonal Meeting +u r
at¢$0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $000 $0 00 5000 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00
Survey/'Survey Coordination out$16 103 6.2 7
See notes in urddual consultant fee breakdown ate $3,200 00 $17,92200 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $775 00 $791.00 $0 00 $0 00 $22,688.00
Toru $95,727.96
lg0 Contrctin DOoets bidding
Additional £OT permitting Requirements +ours
at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Additional Lighting Scooe +lours 10 25 15 20 35 I
ate $2.000 00 $4.350.00 $2,475.00 5000 $3,300 00 5000 $3,955 00 $0 00 $44 56 $16,124.56
In/o tin PR So,e ours 5 16 18 20 2
ate $1,000 00 $2,784.00 $000 $2.970.00 $0 00 $0.00 $2,260 00 $0 00 $89 12 $9,103.12
Coordinatmt utility roiect ours 4 16 18 34
ate $800.00 $2,784.00 $0.00 $2,970.00 $0 00 $0 00 $3,842.00 $0 00 $0.00 $10,396.00
Additional Meetings lou rs
ate $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00
TOTA $35,623.68
Constructiondeinitrattien
Additional FDOT Permitting Requirements +ours
ate 5000 $0 00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $000 5000 $0 00 $000 $0.00
Additional ghting Scope ours 3 10 6 1
ate $600 00 51,74000 $000 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $678 00 $0 00 $44 56 $3,062.56
Incorporation af Rs Scope ours 5 35 18 26 2
ate $1.000 00 $6,090.00 $0.00 $2,970 00 $0 00 $0 00 $2.938 00 $0 00 $89 12 $13,087.12
Coordinating Utility roiect ours 5 35 18 26
ate $1,00000 $6,090 00 $0.00 $2.970 00 5000 50.00 $2,938 00 $0 00 $0 00 5 12,998.00
Additional Meetings ours
a¢$0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00 5000 5000 $0.00
Survey/Survey Coordination +lours 0 0 0
Rate $0 00 $0 00 $0 00 SO 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0 00 $0.00
rOu $29.147.68
s1Arc,goos •sA.Ha,MsurN._oG@rue_rou[_$32mus]
Page 393 of 1310