Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agreement with BCC Engineering, LLC
Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 20 24-33356 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND BCC ENGINEERING,LLC FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO.2024-234-ND RESOLUTION NO.2024-33356 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-A D6360D05E8A Contract No.24-234-0 I TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE ARTICLE 1.DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2.BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 144 ARTICLE 4.RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 14 ARTICLE 5.ADDITIONAL SERVICES 187 ARTICLE 6.REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7.COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8.CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9.OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS...............................................21 ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11.INSURANCE.................................................................................................23 ARTICLE 12.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 254 ARTICLE 13.ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 265 ARTICLE 14.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 265 ARTICLE 15.NOTICE 275 ARTICLE 16.FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW 316 ARTICLE 17.INSPECTOR GENERA L AUDIT RIGHTS 28 ARTCILE 18.MISCELLANEUS PROVISIONS 29 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 36 SCHEDULE 8 38 SCHEDULE C 39 2 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-A D6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 ATTACHED SEPARATELY. ATTACHMENT A:Resolution and Commission Award ATTACHMENT B:Addenda and Request for Qualifications (RFQ)Solicitation ATTACHMENT C:Consultant Proposal Response to RFQ and Sunbiz 3 2024-3335 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-02 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR LIVING SHORELINES r,'}nntL,h This Agreement made and entered into this ("Effective Date")by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida,having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida,33139,(hereinafter referred to as "City"),and CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,a Florida Corporation having its principal office at 201 Alhambra Circle,Suite 601,Coral Gables,Florida 33134 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). WIT NE SETH: WHEREAS,on January 31,2024,the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No.2024-234-ND-Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines (the "RFQ");and WHEREAS the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering consulting firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA)for future work as the need may arise;and WHEREAS,on November 20,2024,the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2024-33356,authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC. as the primary Consultant for Living Shorelines and,if successful,execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ;and WHEREAS,City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFO. NOW THEREFORE,Cily and Consultant,in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained,agree as follows: ARTICLE 1.DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions.The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement.Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents.The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein. 4 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-0I ADDITIONAL SERVICES:"Additional Serv ices"shall mean those services,other than the Basic Serv ices and hourly rates in this Agreement,as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order,which the Consultant shall perform solely,at the City's approval,and which must be duly authorized,in writing,by the City Manager or City Commission,in accordance with City policy. APPLICABLE LAWS:"Applicable Laws"means all laws,statutes,codes (including,but not lim ited to,building codes),ordinances,rules,regulations,lawful orders and decrees of govern m ental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project,the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID:"Base Bid"shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recom m ended by the Consultant (and appro ved by the City)as being within the Construction Cost Budget."Base Bid"shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES:"Basic Services"shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement,as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order.Any Serv ices not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein)shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER):The "City"shall mean the City of Miami Beach,a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida, 33139.In all respects hereunder,City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity.In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a govern mental body including,but not limited to,its regulatory author ity for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits,Public Works Departm ent permits,or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction,the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION:"City Com mission"shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER:The "City Manager"shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing,including the Project Administrator,with respect to any specific m atter(s)concern ing the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserv ed to the City Commission under this Agreement,or to regulatory or adm inistrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET:The "Construction Cost Budget"shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"),as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:"Construction Documents"shall mean the final (100% com pleted)plans,technical specifications,drawings,schematics,documents,and diagrams prepared by the architect/engineer of record for the Project,setting forth in detail the requirem ents for the construction of the Project.The Construction Documents shall set forth in 5 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC38 -9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD 6360D05E8A Contract No.24-234-01 full all details necessary to com plete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Docum ents.Construction Docum ents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a)the Consultant has subm itted com pleted Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and appro ved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the pro cedures as otherw ise provided by the Contract Docum ents. CONSUL TANT:The named entity on page 1 of this Agreem ent,the "Consultant"shall mean the qualified and pro perly pro fessionally licensed pro fessional in the State of Florida and as otherw ise required by any entities,agencies,boards,govern mental authorities and/or any other pro fessional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through subconsultants acceptable to the City)all Services required under this Agreem ent and/or Consultant Serv ice Order.When the term "Consultant"is used in this Agreem ent it shall also be deem ed to include any officers,employees,or agents of Consultants,and any other person or entity acting under the superv ision,direction,or control of Consultant to pro vide any Serv ices or sim ilar pro fessional serv ices with respect to a Project ("subconsultants").The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity,except as otherw ise perm itted in this Agreem ent.Further,any subconsultant that may perform Serv ices on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed professional in the State of Florida and as otherw ise required by any entities,agencies,boards,govern m ental authorities and/or any other pro fessional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional services in connection with the Project.The sub-consultants in Schedule "D'attached hereto,are hereby appro ved by the City Manager fo r the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER:Consultant Service Order (CSO)shall mean the work order issued,in writing,by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule "A"attached hereto),that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Serv ices)which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such CSO ,and which may include studies or study activity,and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes.CSO s must be appro ved pursuant to Contract Approval Authority Pro cedures 03.02 and 03.03.CSO s for Major Construction Projects shall be appro ved by City Com m ission. CONTRACT AMENDMENT:"Contract Amendm ent"shall mean a written modification to the Agreem ent appro ved by the City (as specified below)and executed between City and Consultant,covering changes,additions,or reductions in the term s of this Agreem ent including, without lim itation,authorizing a change in the Services,or the method and manner of performance thereof,or an adjustm ent in the fee and/or com pletion dates.Changes to a CSO shall not be considered a contract am endm ent. Contract Am endm ents shall be approved in accordance with Section 2-369 of the City Code and Contract Appro val Authority Procedure 03.02.Notwithstanding,the City Manager reserv es the right to seek and obtain the concurrence of the City Com m ission for approval of any such Contract Am endm ent. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:"Contract Docum ents"shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits,addenda,Consultant Service Orders,and written amendm ents issued there to)and all Design Docum ents and Construction Docum ents.The Contract Docum ents shall also include, without lim itation (together with all exhibits,addenda,and written am endm ents issued thereto), 6 Docusign Envelope ID:182EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-0 I the Request for Qualifications (RFO),instructions to bidders,bid form,bid bond,Design Criteria Package (if any),the Contract for Construction,surety payment and performance bonds, Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General,Supplementary,and other Conditions), Di visions 0-17 specifications,an approved Change Order(s),approved Construction Change Directive(s),and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CO NTRA CT FOR CONSTRUCTION:"Contract for Construction"shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Consultant for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Docum ents,including,without limitation,a general Consultant,construction manager,design- builder or any other duly licensed construction Consultant selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CO NTRA CTOR:"Contra ctor"shall mean the individual or individuals,firm,company, corporation,joint venture,or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Docum ents. DESIG N CRITERIA PACKAGE or DCP:"Design Criteria Package"means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project,prepared for the purpose of furn ishing suffi cient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal,or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract.The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project,including the legal description of the site,survey information concerning the site,interior space require m ents,material quality standards,schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project,cost or budget estimates,design and construction schedules,site developm ent requirements,provisions for utilities,stormwater retention and disposal,and parking requirem ents applicable to the project. DESIG N DOCUMENTS:"Design Documents"means all plans,drawings specifications, schem atics and all other docum ents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size,configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary fo r the final preparation of the 100%completed,permitted Construction Docum ents in accor dance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including,without limitation,all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate.Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents,until (a)the Consultant has submitted completed Design Docum ents to the City and (b)they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Docum ents.However,approval by the City shall not in any way be construed,interpreted and/or deem ed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Docum ents are constructible,in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. MAJO R CO NSTRUCTION PROJECT:"Major Construction Project"means any building construction,improvem ent,or dem olition with a value of $5 million or greater,or as amended. PRO JECT:The "Project"shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost:The "Project Cost"shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project, as described in the Consultant Service Order (CSO) Project Scope:The "Project Scope"shall mean the description of the Project.as 7 Docusign Envelope ID:182EC388-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 described in the Consultant Serv ice Order (CSO). PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR:The "Project Administrator"shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreem ent (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreem ent,or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS:"Proposal Documents"shall mean the RFQ,together with all amendm ents or addenda thereto (if any),which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement and made a part hereof;provided,however,that in the event of an express conflict betw een the Proposal Docum ents and this Agreement,the Agreement shall prevail.Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreem ent,except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel,its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein,and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with all representations made therein. SCHEDULES:"Schedules"shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: SCHEDULE A--Consultant Service Order SCHEDULE B-Hourly Rate Billing Schedule SCHEDULE_C Approved Subconsultants SCHEDULE D-Anti-Human Trafficking Certification SCOPE OF SERVICES:"Scope of Services"shall include the Project Scope,Basic Services, and any Additional Serv ices (as approved by the City),all as described in Schedule "A"hereto. SERVICES:"Serv ices"shall mean all services,work,and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement,including services delineated as part of the Scope of Services. SOFT COSTS:"Soft Costs"shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including,without limitation,Consultant's Basic Services,Additional Services,surveys, testing,general consultant,financing,permitting fees and other similar costs,as determined by the City,that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. WORK:"W ork"shall mean all labor,materials,equipment,supplies,tools,machinery,utilities, fabrication,transportation,insurance,bonds,permits and conditions thereof,building code changes and govern m ent approvals,licenses,tests,quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications,surveys,studies,and other items,work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction,installation,and functioning of the Pro ject,together with all additional,collateral and incidental items,and work and services required fo r delivery of a com pleted,fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Docum ents. 8 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST:The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost"shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI)format or other format approved by the Project Administrator,which includes the Consultant's estim ated total construction cost to the City of the W ork for the Pro ject (as established in the Contract Docum ents ,as they may be amended from time to tim e).The Statem ent of Pro bable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each elem ent of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees,general conditions and construction contingency for the Pro ject.Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK:"W ork"shall m ean all labor,materials,equipm ent,supplies,tools,machinery,utilities, fabrication,transportation,insurance,bonds,permits and conditions thereof.building code changes and govern ment approvals,licenses,tests,quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications,surv eys,studies,and other items,work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction,installation,and functioning of the Pro ject,together with all additional,collateral and incidental item s,and work and services required fo r delivery of a completed,fully functional and functioning Pro ject as set forth in the Contract Docum ents. ARTICLE 2.BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The PRIM E CO NSUL TANT FO R SEAW ALLS shall provide Basic Services fo r the Pro ject,specifically described in the Consultant Serv ice O rder ("CSO ")and in accordance with the billing rate schedule attached hereto as Schedule "B". 2.2 The Serv ices will be com m enced by the Consultant upon re ceipt of a written CSO signed by the City M anager or the Pro ject Adm inistra tor.Consultant shall countersign the CSO upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City.CSO s shall be executed in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Pro cedure 03.02 or as amended.Any CSO not executed in accordance herewith shall be null and void. 2.3 As it relates to the Serv ices and the Project,Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall com ply with all Applicable Laws.The Consultant agrees to com ply with all Applicable Laws,whether now in effect or as may be am ended or adopted from tim e to time and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Serv ices required under this Agreem ent shall be perform ed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in com parable pro jects in South Florida.Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced.fully qualified.and pro perly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws)ta perform the Services.Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible fo r the technical accuracy of the Services. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks,incl uding planning, design,bidding/award,preparation of a DCP,studies,construction adm inistra tion,and Additional Services (as may be appro ved),all as further described in the Consultant Serv ice O rder;and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with re spect to the Project.as set forth in the G eneral Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 9 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES:No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including,without limitation,any design errors or omissions (if applicable to the services performed by Consultant).Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any subconsultants),for the accuracy and competency of the Services,nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Services.Moreover,neither the City's inspection,review,approval or acceptance of,nor payment for,any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any subconsultant)of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement,nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement,or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement.The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct,unlawful acts,negligent acts,errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME:It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and,in this respect,the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term:The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant,which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof,and shall be in effect for three (3)years ("Initial Term"),plus two (2),one (1)year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term").Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines,as set forth in the Consultant Service Order,including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7 .2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement,and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project,the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator)in order to provide for the safe,expeditious,economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order.The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time,if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions,or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project).Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay;the requested adjustment (i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule;and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. 10 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require),the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved,and authorize that the appro priate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule.The Project Administrator's appro val (if granted)shall be in writing. 2.7.5 For any CSO executed prior to the expiration or termination of the Agreement, the pricing,terms and conditions established herein shall surv ive the expiration or termination of the Agreem ent until the requirem ents of the CSO have been com pleted. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive,professional,cooperative working relationship with the Project Adm inistrator,Consultant,and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted,or otherw ise retained,to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agre em ent,and under a Consultant Service O rder,in a com petent,tim ely and professional manner,and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its perform ance,except to the ext ent that acts or om issions by the City m ake such performance im possible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible fo r the professional quality,technical accuracy, com pleteness,performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreem ent and under the Consultant Serv ice O rder (including the services performed by subconsultants),within the specified tim e period and specified cost.The Consultant shall perform the Serv ices utilizing the skill,know ledge,and judgm ent ordinarily possessed and used by a pro ficient consultant with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Serv ices in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for and shall represent to City that the Serv ices conform to the City's requirem ents,the Contract Docum ents and all Applicable Laws.The Consultant shall be and rem ain liable to the City fo r all dam ages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or erro rs or om issions in the perform ance of the Serv ices.In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have,the Consultant shall,at its expense,re-perform all or any portion of the Serv ices to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards.The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacem ent or repair of any defective materials and equipm ent and for the cost of the re- performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreem ent,until tw elve (12)months following final acceptance of the W ork.The Project Adm inistrator shall notify the Consultant,in writing,of any deficiencies and shall appro ve the method and tim ing of the correct ions. 2.11 The City shall have the right,at any tim e,in its sole and absolute discretion,to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense)any or all parts of the Serv ices and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s).W henever others are required to verify,review ,or consider any Serv ices performed by Consultant (including,without lim itation, Consultants,other design pro fessionals,and/or other consultants retained by the City),the intent of such re quirem ent is to enable the Consultant to receive input fro m others'pro fessional expertise to identify any discrepancies,errors or om issions that are inconsistent with industry standards relating to com parable projects;or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws;or which are inconsistent with standards,decisions or appro vals pro vided by the City under this Agreem ent.Consultant will use re asonable care and skill,in accordance and consistent with custom ary pro fessional standards,in responding to item s identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection.Consultant shall receive com m ents from reviewers,in writing. 11 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD63605E8A Contract No.24-234-0 I Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner.The term "timely"shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances,taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2 .12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which,under Florida Statutes,requires a license,certificate of authorization,or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s),it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate,in writing,within five (5)calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order,a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager").The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing,coordinating and administrating all aspects of the Services.Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement)shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator.Replacement (including reassignment)of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e.the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees,within fourteen (14)calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore),to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager,or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project (including,without limitation,any subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge,furnish or make available to any third party(ies),any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project,without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator,unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services;or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws;or,in the course of judicial proceedings,where such information has been properly subpoenaed.Consultant shall also require subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services,as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order,do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project.If, during the course of performing work,services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order,Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order)which is,in the Consultant's reasonable opinion,outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order,then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator,in writing,and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services.If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator,said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services).Mere 12 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work.Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish,maintain,and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City,upon request,with copies of any and all such documents and/or records.In addition,Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST,FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION,FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSUL TANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT,IN ANY WAY,BE CONSTRUED,INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS,A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSUL TANT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION,NOR SHALL IT LIMIT,IN ANY WAY,THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RAISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM,ACTION,SUIT ANDIOR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE,THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION,ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS.INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES,OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT.IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2 .18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS:If applicable,the Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575,Florida Statutes,and Chapter 100 of the City Code,as both may be amended from time to time,addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS:All services provided by any subconsultant shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview.Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement.Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the subconsultants. The Consultant shall not replace any subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager,in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution.The Consultant shall cause the names of subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its 13 Docusign Envelope ID:1B82EC388-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-0l subconsultants'com pliance with the requirem ents of this Section and any other provision of the Agreem ent and/or Consultant Serv ice Order.W ith respect to the performance of work by subconsultants,the Consultant shall,in approving and accepting such work,ensure the professional quality,com pleteness,and coordination of the subconsultant's work. For basic services in accordance with the hourly rates established herein,the Consultant shall not retain,or add any subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager or City Com mission,in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any pro posed substitution.The Consultant shall cause the names of subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Serv ices to be inserted on the plans and specifications.For additional or ancillary services in accordance or not with the hourly rates established here in,the Consultant shall not retain or add any subconsultant without the written approval of the City Manager or City Com mission,in accordance with City policy. The Consultant shall,upon the request of the City,subm it to the City such documentation and inform ation as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation,standing,ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and subconsultants),including organizational docum ents,operating agreements and professional licensure documentation,and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the subconsultant with respect to the Project.However,the City's failure to request such docum entation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section,the Agreem ent and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse,waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirem ents set forth therein including,without limitation,the professional licensure requirem ents.Any approval of a subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by the subconsultant.Payment of subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator,who shall be the City's authorized representa tive to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's appro val under the Contra ct Docum ents.The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without lim itation)to transmit instructions,receive information,and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Serv ices and the Project.The Project Adm inistrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Docum ents,pro vided,however,that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncom pliance,or to specifically direct or require com pliance,shall in no way constitute a waiver of,or excuse,the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Docum ents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant,for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project.Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that,in making any such infor mation available to Consultant,the City makes no express or im plied certification,warra nty,and/or representation as to the accuracy or com pleteness of such information and assum es no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the suffi ciency,completeness or accuracy of such information.The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges,that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furn ished by the City,and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy 14 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 and applicability of all such information used by Consultant.Such verification shall include, without lim itation,visual exam ination of existing conditions in all locations encom passed by the Pro ject,where such exam ination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or dem olition).Surv ey info rmation shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any tim e,in his/her sole discretion,the City Manager may furnish accounting,and insurance counseling services fo r the Project (including,without lim itation,auditing serv ices to verify the Consultant's applications for payment,or to ascertain that Consultant has pro perly remitte d paym ent due to its subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observ es or otherw ise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project,or non-conformance with the Contra ct Docum ents,the City,thro ugh the Project Adm inistra tor, shall give prom pt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City,act ing in its proprietary capacity as O wner and not in its regulatory capacity , shall render any adm inistrative appro vals and decisions required under this Agreement.in writing,as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Serv ices and of the W ork. 3.6 The City Comm ission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct,by passage of an enabling resolution or am endm ent to this Agreement: 3.6.1 The City Com m ission shall be the body to consider,comm ent upon,or approve any assignm ent,sale,transf er or subletting of this Agreem ent.Assignm ent and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate consultant. 3.6.2 Contract Amendm ents shall be approved in accordance with Contract Appro val Author ity Pro cedure 03.02 or as amended. 3.7 Except where othe rw ise expressly noted in this Agreem ent,the City Manager shall serv e as the City's prim ary repre sentative ta whom adm inistrative (proprietary)requests fo r decisions and appro vals required hereunder by the City shall be made.Ex cept where otherw ise expressly noted in this Agreem ent or the Contract Docum ents,the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include,without lim itation,pro prietary review,appro val,or comm ent upon the schedules,plans,reports,estim ates,contracts,and other docum ents subm itted to the City by Consultant. 3.7 .1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacem ents)and of any subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide and render adm inistrative (pro prietary )decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreem ent which are not otherw ise expressly provided for in this Agreem ent.In his/her discretion,the City M anager may also consult with the City Com m ission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant,the City Manager shall be authorized,but not required,to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; pro vided,however,that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreem ent)may not be increased without the prior appro val of the City Com m ission, 15 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 which approval (if granted at all)shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 Contract Amendm ents shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended. 3.7.5 The City Manager may,in his/her sole discretion,form a committee or com m ittees,or inquire of,or consult with,persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers,duties,and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s)under this Agreement,and,should such default remain uncured,in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review,evaluation,or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project,or portions thereof,detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City,and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4.RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project,as set forth mn the Consultant Service Order.Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded.As part of the Basic Services,Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget.Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates,cost-saving alternatives, and implem entation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items,as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2.Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of com pletion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents,unless otherw ise specified in a written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1.At com pletion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Docum ents as may be specified by the Project Administrator),Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Pro bable Construction Cost,which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%)of the Construction Cost Budget.If at the foregoing stage of design,the Consultant's Statement of Pro bable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%),then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform to the Consultant's estim ated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%)of the City's Construction Budget.Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications,Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design 16 Docusign Envelope ID:182EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD63605E8A Contract No.24-234-01 Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.2.A the 30%and 60%completion of the Design Documents,Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost.which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%)of the Construction Cost Budget.If at the foregoing stages of design,the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant.Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform to the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%)of the City's Construction Budget.Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications,Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3.At the 90%stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents,Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%)of the Construction Cost Budget.If at the foregoing stages of design, the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant.Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform to the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%)of the City's Construction Budget.Upon obtaining the City's approval, Consuttant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90)days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design),as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4.To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget,each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees,general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3.Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto,represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry,provided,however,that Consultant cannot (and does not)guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s)prepared (or otherwise provided)by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant,and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope,construction schedule,sequence of Work,or such other action,as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost,and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including,without limitation,the Construction Documents)within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90)days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), 17 Docusign Envelope ID:1B82EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-0I and shall pro vide re-bidding services,as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City,as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City,in order to bring any resulting,responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%)of the Consultant's final updated Statem ent of Probable Cost. 4.5.The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary,and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure)which are beyond the control of the parties.Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Com m ission approval which,if granted at all,shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Com m ission.The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and,if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded,the City Commission may,at its sole and absolute discretion,terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Serv ices)without any further liability to the City. 4.6.The City Com mission may,at its sole and absolute discretion,and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 thro ugh 4.5 above,separately elect any of the following options.(1)approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget;(2)reject all bids,and (at its option)authorize rebidding of the Project;(3)abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Serv ices without any further liability to the City;(4)select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5.ADDITIONAL SERVICES 5.1 Additional Serv ices shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to com m encem ent of any such additional work by Consultant).The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required;a lump sum to be negotiated at the tim e of the request for additional services or a fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto),with a "Not to Exceed"am ount;Reimbursable Expenses (if any)with a "Not to Exceed" am ount;the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable);the time required to complete the Additional Services;and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable)."Not to Exceed"shall mean the maximum cumulative fees allowable (or,in the case of Reimbursable Expenses,the maxim um cumulative expenses allowable),which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator.The "Not to Exceed"amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or,in the case of Reimbursables, fo r the expenses),and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, fo r Reimbursables,expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Serv ices include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals:Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities,and surveys or inventories in connection with construction perform ed by City. 5.2.2.Unforeseen Conditions.Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding conditions determ ined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and 18 Docusign Envelope ID:1B82EC38 -9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 causes resulting from error,omission,inadvertence,or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3.City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents:Making revisions to Construction Docum ents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements,when such revisions are inconsistent with written appro vals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the contro l of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness:Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testim ony,preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own nam e,that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the perform ance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Pro curement:Assistance in connection with bid protests,re-bidding,or re- negotiating contracts (except fo r Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof,which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6.Models:Preparing professional perspectives,models or renderings in addition to those pro vided fo r in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherw ise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the pro vision of Basic Services. 5.2.7.Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection:Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services,provided that Consultant,as part of the Basic Serv ices,shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observ ed in the W ork. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys &Testing:Environmental investigations and site evaluations,provided,however,that surveys of the existing structure required to com plete as-built docum entation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering.Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. 5.3 Additional services may be requested by the City using a Consultant Service Order (CSO ).For each proposed Consultant Serv ice Order,Consultant shall provide the City with a cost proposal on a lum p sum or not-to-exceed basis,based on the fee schedule set forth in Schedule "C"hereto.Consultant Service Order shall be executed in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedures 03.02 and 03.03 or as amended.Any CSO not executed in accordance herewith shall be null and void. Except as specified herein,serv ices that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. Reim bursable Expenses and/or Contingency are allowance(s)set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures (no markups allowed)made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project,provided such expenses are authorized in advance by the City.The Reimbursable Expenses and/or Contingency allowance(s),as specified herein,belongs to,and shall be controlled by the City (i.e.unused portions will be retained by the City and shall not be paid to Consultant). 19 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 Notwithstanding the above,any Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized,in advance,in writing,by the City Manager or corresponding Department's Director.Invoices or vouchers for Reim bursable Expenses shall be submitted to the corresponding Department's Director (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material required to support the amount invoiced,and as requested by the corresponding Department's Director).Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement."Only actual amounts incurred and paid (requiring pro of of payment)by the Consultant shall be invoiced,without any markups and/or additions. ARTICLE 6.REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reim bursable Expenses must be authorized,in advance,in writing,by the Project Administrator.Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator).Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the am ounts and items claim ed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement."Reimbursable Expenses may include,but not be limited to,the following: •Cost of repro duction,courier,and postage and handling of drawings,plans, specifications,and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its subconsultants,and courier,postage and handling costs betw een the Consultant and its subconsultants). •Costs for repro duction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. •Perm it fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e.City perm it fees). •All travel shall be pre-approved and reimbursed in accordance with City Administrative Order 0D.20.02,current or as amended. ARTICLE 7.COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7.1 Consultant's "Lump Sum"or "Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services,or portions thereof,as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order attached hereto as Schedule "A",issued for a particular Project,shall be negotiated betw een the City and Consultant,and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Paym ents for Services shall be made within forty-five (45)calendar days of receipt and appro val of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator.Payments shall be made in pro portion to the Services satisfactorily performed,so that the payments for Servi ces never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice).No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work.In addition to the invoice,the Consultant shall,for Hourly Rate authorizations,submit a progress report giving the percentage of com pletion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 20 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly billing rates set forth in Schedule "B,"attached hereto.Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request.No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto,up to the "Not to Exceed"Reimbursable allowance amount set forth in Schedule A-1 or Consultant Service Order (as applicable).Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request.No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7 .5 ESCALATION:The initial hourly rates set forth in Schedule B shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement.Ninety (90)days prior to expiration of the Initial Term,the City Manager may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year. Cost adjustments should be limited to changes in the applicable Bureau of Labor Statistics index for the local region or other verifiable evidence of price increases.The Contractor's adjustment request must substantiate the requested increase.The City of Miami Beach, through its city manager,reserves the right to approve a requested adjustment or may terminate the Agreement and readvertise for bids for the goods or services. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Consultant. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT.Consultant shall invoice the Project Administrator in a timely manner,but no more than once on a monthly basis,per project. Invoices shall identify/include the nature and extent of the work performed;the total hours of work performed by employee category;and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith.In the event sub-consultant work is used,the percentage of completion shall be identified.Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses.A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s)or Reimbursable Expense(s)shall accompany the invoice. Invoices shall be submitted to the City at the following address: Accounts Payable:payables@miamibeachfl.gov 7.7.1 If requested,Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category},and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8.CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books,records (whether financial or otherwise),correspondence,technical documents,and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager,or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 ["Notices"]),during customary business hours.All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3)years after Consultant's completion of the Services.Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and 21 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries.Consultant shall also bind its subconsultants to the requirem ents of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9.OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 AII notes,correspondence,documents,plans and specifications,designs,drawings, renderings,calculations,specifications,models,photographs,reports,surveys,investigations, and any other docum ents (whether completed or partially completed)and copyrights thereto for Services performed or pro duced in the performance of this Agreement,or related to the Project. whether in its native electronic form,paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction,shall become the pro perty of the City.Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form,as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30)days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30)days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be).However,the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing,In addition,the Consultant shall not disclose,release,or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager.The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.Nothing contained herein shall be deem ed to exclude any document from Chapter 119,Florida Statutes. 9.2 The Consultant is perm itted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written appro val of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option,the Consultant may be authorized,as an Additional Service,to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City;however,payment to the Consultant fo r such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50%of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without perm ission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant.The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS:The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its perform ance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may term inate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10 .2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE:The City,through the City Manager,may terminate this 22 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360O5E8A Contract No 24-234-0 l Agreement for cause,upon written notice to Consultant,in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith;(2)unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof;or (3)does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner.In the case of termination for cause by the City,the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City,the City,at its sole option and discretion,may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s),or otherwise.The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s)incurred by the City due to such termination."Additional Cost"is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City,the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in,or can be calculated from,the City's initial written default notice).Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2,the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2,the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared)by Consultant (including,without limitation,those referenced in subsection 9.1 hereof).The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly,copy,and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE:In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause,the City through the City Manager,may also terminate this Agreement.upon fourteen (14)days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience,without cause,and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion)it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City.In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience,Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice),and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above).Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3,the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULTANT:The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause,upon thirty (30)days prior written notice to the City,in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof.In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant,the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided,however,that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 23 D o cusig n Envelope ID :1B 2EC 3B8-9C D 9-4 75F-99C 9-A D 6360D 5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION:In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience ),the Consultant shall immediately,upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination:(1)stop the performance of Services;(2)place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts,except for those which may have already been approved,in writing,by the Project Adm inistrator;(3)term inate all existing orders and subcontracts;and (4)promptly assemble all Project docum ents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11.INSURANCE 11.1 The maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the Agreement and failure to maintain or renew coverage may be treated as a material breach of the Agreement,which could result in withholding of payments or termination of the Agreement. 11.2.Workers'Com pensation Insurance for all em ployees of the Contractor as required by Florida Statute Chapter 440 and Employer Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.Should the Contractor be exem pt from this Statute,the Contractor and each employee shall hold the City harm less from any injury incurred during perform ance of the Contract.The exem pt contractor shall also submit (i)a written statement detailing the num ber of em ployees and that they are not required to carry Workers' Com pensation insurance and do not anticipate hiring any additional employees during the term of this contra ct or (ii)a copy of a Certificate of Exemption. 11.3.Com m ercial General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis,including pro ducts and com pleted operations,pro perty dam age,bodily injury and personal &advertising injury with lim its no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence,and $2,000,000 general aggregate. 11.4 .Autom obile Liability Insurance covering any automobile,if consultant has no owned automobiles,then coverage for hired and non-owned automobiles,with lim it no less than $1,000,000 combined per accident for bodily injury and property dam age. 11.5.Professional Liability (Errors &Omissions)Insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession,with limit no less than $1,000,000. 11.6 Additional Insured -City of Miam i Beach must be included by endorsement as an additional insured with respect to all liability policies (except Professional Liability and Workers' Com pensation)arising out of work or operations performed on behalf of the Consultant including materials,parts,or equipm ent furnished in connection with such work or operations and autom obiles owned.leased,hired or borro wed in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance. 11.7 Notice of Cancellation-Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled,except with notice to the City of Miami Beach c/o EXIGIS Insurance Com pliance Services. 24 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-0 I 11.8 Waiver of Subrogation -Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect the waiver of subrogation on the required coverages.However,this provision applies regardless of whether the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 11.9 Acceptability of Insurers -Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A:VII or higher.If not rated,exceptions may be made for members of the Florida Insurance Funds (i.e.FWCIGA,FAJUA).Carriers may also be considered if they are licensed and authorized to do insurance business in the State of Florida. 11.10 Verification of Coverage -Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and arnendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable insurance language,effecting coverage required by this contract.All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.However,failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them.The City reserves the right to require complete,certified copies of all required insurance policies,including endorsements,required by these specifications.at any time. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH c/o EXIGIS Insurance Compliance Services P.O.Box 947 Murrieta,CA 92564 Kindly submit all certificates of insurance,endorsements,exemption letters to our servicing agent,EXIGIS,at: Certificates-miamibeach@riskworks.com 11.11 Special Risks or Circumstances -The City of Miami Beach reserves the right to modify these requirements,including limits,based on the nature of the risk,prior experience, insurer,coverage,or other special circumstances. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the vendor of his liability and obligation under this section or under any other section of this agreement. ARTICLE 12.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08,Florida Statutes,the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents,and instrumentalities, from liabilities,damages,losses,and costs,including,but not limited to,reasonable attorneys' fees,to the extent caused by the negligence,recklessness,or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims,suits,or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable,including appellate proceedings,and shall pay all costs,judgments,and attorney's 25 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD636005E8A Contract No.24-234-01 fees which may issue thereon.Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify,keep,and save harmless and defend the City or its officers,employees,agents,and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent,reckless,or intentionally wrongful actions,errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions.In reviewing,approving or rejecting any submissions by the Consultant,or other acts of the Consultant,the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including,without limitation its subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers)under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13.ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS:It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error,an omission,or any combination thereof in the Consultant's performance of the Services will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error.The damages to the City for errors,omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant,including,without limitation,the direct,indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error,omission,or any combination thereof.Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors,omissions,or any combination thereof,the Consultant may appeal this determination,in writing,to the Project Administrator.The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final,conclusive,and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable.In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator,the Consultant shall present any such objections,in writing,to the City Manager.The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager.This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement,so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed"amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement,less any amount(s)actually paid to Consultant hereunder.Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement,with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement,less any amount(s)actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly,and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement,Consultant 26 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement,in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount"of Consultant's fees under this Agreement,which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s)actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection,or elsewhere in this Agreement,is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability,as set forth in Section 768.28,Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15.NOTICE Until changed by notice in writing,all such notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: Public Works Engineering Department City of Miami Beach 140 MacArthur Cswy, Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attn:Bradford Kaine,Interim Public Works Director Ph:305-673-7616 ext.3541 Email:BradfordKaine@miamibeachfl.gov With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attn:Eric Carpenter,City Manager Email:EricCarpenter@miamibeachfl.gov All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: BBC Engineering,LLC Attn:Victor H.Herrera,P.E. 6401 SW 87"Avenue,Suite 200 Miami FL,33173 Ph:305-670-2350 Email:Vherrera@bcceng.com All notices mailed electronically to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted. ARTICLE 16.CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW 16.1 Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119,Florida Statutes,as may be amended from time to time. 27 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 16.2 The term "public records"shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011(12),which means all documents,papers,letters,maps,books,tapes,photographs,films,sound recordings.data processing software,or other material,regardless of the physical form, characteristics,or means of transmission,made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. 16.3 Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes,if the Consultant meets the definition of "Consultant"as defined in Section 119.0701(1)(a),the Consultant shall: (a)Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (b)Upon request from the City's custodian of public records.provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119,Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (c)Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed,except as authorized by law,for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (d)Upon completion of the Agreement.transfer,at no cost to the City,all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service.If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement,the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements.If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement,the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records.All records stored electronically must be provided to the City,upon request from the City's custodian of public records,in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. 16.4 REQUEST FOR RECORDS;NONCOMPLIANCE. 16.4.1 A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City.If the City does not possess the requested records,the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request,and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or' copied within a reasonable time. 16.4.2 Consultant's failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement,and the City,at its sole discretion,may:(1) unilaterally terminate the Agreement;(2)avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement;and/or (3)avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. 16 4.3 A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s.119,10. 16.5 CIVIL ACTION. 16.5.1 If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records 28 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD63605E8A Contract No.24-234-01 relating to the City's contract for services,the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement,including reasonable attorneys'fees,if: (a)The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time;and (b)At least 8 business days before filing the action,the plaintiff provided written notice of the public records request,including a statement that the Consultant has not complied with the request,to the City and to the Consultant. 16.5.2 A notice complies with subparagraph (16.5.1 )(b)if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent.Such notices must be sent by common carrier delivery service or by registered,Global Express Guaranteed,or certified mail,with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery,which may be in an electronic format. 16.5.3 A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. 16.6 IF THE CONSULTANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119,FLORIDA STATUTES,TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT,CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION:RAFAEL E.GRANADO,CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA 33139 E-MAIL:RAFAELGRANADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE:305-673-7411 ARTICLE 17.INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT RIGHTS 17.1 Pursuant to Section 2-256 of the Code of the City of Miami Beach,the City has established the Office of the Inspector General which may,on a random basis,perform reviews, audits,inspections,and investigations on all City contracts,throughout the duration of said contracts.This random audit is separate and distinct from any other audit performed by or on behalf of the City. 17.2 The Office of the Inspector General is authorized to investigate City affairs and empowered to review past,present and proposed City programs,accounts,records,contracts and transactions.In addition,the Inspector General has the power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths,require the production of witnesses and monitor City projects and programs. 29 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CO9-475F-99C9-BAD6360O5E8A Contract No.24-234-0l Monitoring of an existing City project or program may include a report concerning whether the project is on time,within budget and in conformance with the contract documents and applicable law,The Inspector General shall have the power to audit,investigate,monitor,oversee,inspect and review operations,activities,performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design,bid specifications,(bid/proposal)submittals,activities of the Consultant,its officers,agents and employees,lobbyists,City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption.Pursuant to Section 2-378 of the City Code,the City is allocating a percentage of its overall annual contract expenditures to fund the activities and operations of the Office of Inspector General. 17.3 Upon ten (10)days written notice to the Consultant,the Consultant shall make all requested records and documents available to the Inspector General for inspection and copying.The Inspector General is empowered to retain the services of independent private sector auditors to audit,investigate,monitor,oversee,inspect and review operations activities, performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design,bid specifications,(bid/proposal)submittals,activities of the Consultant its officers,agents and employees,lobbyists,City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption. 17.4 The Inspector General shall have the right to inspect and copy all documents and records in the Consultant's possession,custody or control which in the Inspector General's sole judgment,pertain to performance of the contract,including,but not limited to original estimate files,change order estimate files,worksheets,proposals and agreements from and with successful subconsultants and suppliers,all project-related correspondence,memoranda, instructions,financial documents,construction documents,(bid/proposal)and contract documents,back-change documents,all documents and records which involve cash,trade or volume discounts,insurance proceeds,rebates,or dividends received,payroll and personnel records and supporting documentation for the aforesaid documents and records, 17.5 The Consultant shall make available at its office at all reasonable times the records, materials,and other evidence regarding the acquisition (bid preparation)and performance of this Agreement,for examination,audit,or reproduction,until three (3)years after final payment under this Agreement or for any longer period required by statute or by other clauses of this Agreement.In addition: (a)If this Agreement is completely or partially terminated,the Consultant shall make available records relating to the work terminated until three (3)years after any resulting final termination settlement;and (b)The Consultant shall make available records relating to appeals or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this Agreement until such appeals, litigation,or claims are finally resolved. 17.6 The provisions in this section shall apply to the Consultant,its officers,agents, employees,subconsultants and suppliers.The Consultant shall incorporate the provisions in this section in all subcontracts and all other agreements executed by the Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 17.7 Nothing in this section shall impair any independent right to the City to conduct audits or 30 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 investigative activities.The provisions of this section are neither intended nor shall they be construed to im pose any liability on the City by the Consultant or third parties. ARTICLE 18.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 18.1 VENUE AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL:This Agreement shall be governed by,and construed in accordance with,the laws of the State of Florida,both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County,Florida,if in state court,and the U.S.District Court,Southern District of Florida,in federal court.BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT ANO CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO,OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 18.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS:Consultant agrees that it will not discrim inate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race,color,national origin,religion,sex,gender identity,sexual orientation, disability,marital or fam ilial status,or age,and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are em ployed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color,national origin,religion,sex,gender identity,sexual orientation,disability,marital or familial status,or age. 18.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT:In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133,Florida Statutes),a person or affiliate who is a consultant,who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City,may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work,may not bid on leases of real property to the City,may not be awarded or perform work as a Consultant, supplier,subconsultant,or subconsultant under a contract with the City,and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017,Florida Statutes,for Category Two,for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.For violation of this subsection by Consultant,City shall have the right to term inate the Agreement without any liability to City,and pursue debarment of Consultant 18.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE:Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant,to solicit or secure this Agreement.and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person,company, corporation,individual or firm,other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee,com m ission,percentage,gift,or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.For the breach or violation of this subsection,City shall have the right to term inate the Agreement.without any liability or,at its discretion,to deduct fro m the contract price (or otherw ise recover)the full amount of such fee,commission, percentage,gift,or consideration. 18.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 18.5.1 The Consultant shall,during the Term of this Agreement,be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project 31 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 18.5.2 Project Documents.In accordance with Section 119.071 (3)(b)2),Florida Statutes,entitled "General exemptions from inspecting or copying public records,"all building plans,blueprints,schematic drawings,and diagrams, including draft,preliminary,and final formats,are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1),Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s.24(a),Article I of the State Constitution.Information made exempt by this paragraph,with prior written approval from the City Manager,may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities;to a licensed architect, engineer,or Consultant who ls performing work on or related to the Project;or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction.The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 18.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 18.5.2,the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal,State,and City procedures,as may be amended from time to time,by which the documents are handled,copied,and distributed which may include, but is not limited to,each employee of Consultant and subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy,duplicate,or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager,in writing. 18.5.2.2 The Consultant and its subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 18.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 18.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time,and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 18.5.3 E-Verify 18.5.3.1 Consultant shall comply with Section 448.095,Florida Statutes, "Employment Eligibility"("E-Verify Statute"),as may be amended from time to time.Pursuant to the E-Verify Statute,commencing on January 1,2021,Consultant shall register with and use the E-Verify system to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees during the Term of the Agreement.Additionally, Consultant shall expressly require any subconsultant performing work or providing services pursuant to the Agreement to likewise utilize the U.S.Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subconsultant during the contract Term.If Consultant enters into a contract with an approved subconsultant,the subconsultant must provide the Consultant with an affidavit stating that the subconsultant does not employ,contract with,or subcontract with an unauthorized alien. Consultant shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of 32 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C09-BAD6360D05E8A Contract No.24-234-01 the Agreement or such other extended period as may be required under this Agreement. 18.5.3.2 TERMINATION RIGHTS. 18.5.3.2.1 If the City has a good faith belief that Consultant has knowingly violated Section 448.09(1),Florida Statutes,the City shall terminate this Agreement with Consultant for cause,and the City shall thereafter have or owe no further obligation or liability to Consultant. 18.3.5.2.2 If the City has a good faith belief that a subconsultant has knowingly violated the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.1 but the Consultant otherwise complied with such subsection,the City will promptly notify the Consultant and order the Consultant to immediately terminate the Agreement with the subconsultant. Consultant's failure to terminate a subconsultant shall be an event of default under this Agreement,entitling City to terminate the Consultant's contract for cause. 18.5.3.2.3 A contract terminated under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 or 18.5.3.2.2 is not in breach of contract and may not be considered as such. 18.5.3.2.4 The City or Consultant or a subconsultant may file an action with the Circuit or County Court to challenge a termination under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 or 18.5.3.2.2 no later than 20 calendar days after the date on which the contract was terminated. 18.5.3.2.5 It the City terminates the Agreement with Consultant under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 Consultant may not be awarded a public contract for at least 1 year after the date of termination of this Agreement. 18.5.3.2.6 Consultant is liable for any additional costs incurred by the City as a result of the termination of this Agreement under this Section 18.5.3. 18.6 FORCE MAJEURE: 18.6.1 A "Force Majeure"event is an event that (i)in fact causes a delay in the performance of the Consultant or the City's obligations under the Agreement,and (ii)is beyond the reasonable control of such party unable to perform the obligation,and (iii)is not due to an intentional act,error,omission,or negligence of such party,and (iv)could not have reasonably been foreseen and prepared for by such party at any time prior to the occurrence of the event.Subject to the foregoing criteria,Force Majeure may include events such as war,civil insurrection,riot.fires,epidemics,pandemics,terrorism, sabotage,explosions,embargo restrictions,quarantine restrictions,transportation accidents,strikes,strong hurricanes or tornadoes,earthquakes,or other acts of God which prevent performance.Force Majeure shall not include technological impossibility, inclement weather,or failure to secure any of the required permits pursuant to the Agreement. 33 Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 18.6.2 If the City or Consultant's performance of its contractual obligations is prevented or delayed by an event believed by to be Force Majeure,such party shall immediately upon learning of the occurrence of the event or of the commencement of any such delay, but in no case within fifteen (15)business days thereof,provide notice of (i)of the occurrence of event of Force Majeure,(ii)of the nature of the event and the cause thereof,(iii)of the anticipated im pact an the Agreem ent,(iv)of the anticipated period of the delay,and (v)of what course of action such party plans to take in order to mitigate the detrim ental effects of the event.The tim ely delivery of the notice of the occurrence of a Force Majeure event is a condition precedent to allowance of any relief pursuant ta this section;however,receipt of such notice shall not constitute acceptance that the event claim ed to be a Force Majeure event is in fact Force M ajeure,and the burden of proof of the occurrence of a Force Majeure event shall be on the requesting party. 18.6.3 No party hereto shall be liable for its failure to carry out its obligations under the Agreem ent during a period when such party is rendered unable,in whole or in part,by Force Majeure to carry out such obligations.The suspension of any of the obligations under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure event shall be of no greater scope and no longer duration than is required.The party shall use its reasonable best efforts to continue to perform its obligations hereunder to the extent such obligations are not affected or are only partially affected by the Force Majeure event,and to correct or cure the event or condition excusing performance and otherw ise to remedy its inability to perform to the extent its inability to perform is the direct result of the Force Majeure event with all reasonable dispatch. 18.6.4 O bligations pursuant to the Agreem ent that aro se before the occurrence of a Force Majeure event causing the suspension of perform ance shall not be excused as a result of such occurrence unless such occurrence makes such performance not reasonably possible.The obligation to pay money in a tim ely m anner for obligations and liabilities which matured prior to the occurrence of a Force Majeure event shall not be subject to the Force Majeure provisions. 18.6.5 Notw ithstanding any other pro vision to the contrary herein,in the event of a Force Majeure occurrence,the City may,at the sole discretion of the City Manager, suspend the City's paym ent obligations under the Agreem ent,and m ay take such action without regard to the notice requirements herein.Additionally,in the event that an event of Force Majeure delays a party 's performance under the Agreement fo r a tim e period greater than thirty (30)days,the City may,at the sole discretion of the City Manager, term inate the Agreement on a given date,by giving written notice to Consultant of such term ination.If the Agreem ent is term inated pursuant to this Section,Consultant shall be paid for any Services satisfactorily performed up to the date of term ination;following which the City shall be discharged fro m any and all liabilities,duties.and term s arising out of,or by virtue of,this Agre em ent.In no event will any condition of Force Majeure extend this Agreem ent beyond its stated term .Any tim e extension shall be subject to mutual agreem ent and shall not be cause fo r any claim by the Consultant fo r extra com pensation,unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 34 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 18.7 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:If applicable to the performance of Consultant's Serv ices,the Consultant shall prepare,without added compensation,all necessary supplem ental docum ents to correct errors,omissions,and/or ambiguities which may exist in the Contract Docum ents prepared by Consultant,including documents prepared by its subconsultants.Com pliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors,omissions,and/or ambiguities in the Contra ct Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 18.8 ASSIGNMENT:The Consultant shall not assign,transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person,firm ,association or corporation,in whole or in part,without the prior written consent of the City Commission,which consent,if given at all,shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion.However,the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Serv ices to be performed by subconsultants,subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 18.9 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:The Consultant and the City each binds him self/herself,his/her partners,successors,legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners,successors,legal representatives,and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement.The Consultant shall afford the City (thro ugh the City Commission)the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 18.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES:In the performance of the Services prescribed herein,it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries,wages,materials,equipment,subconsultants,and other purchased services,etc.,as necessary to com plete said Services. 18.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 18.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide all necessary items for the pro per completion of the Services.The Consultant shall perform,as Basic Services,such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced,as necessary to com plete the Project. 18.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary,to any person,nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreem ent to maintain a suit for personal injuries,professional liability,or property dam age pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 18.10.3 No acceptance,order,payment,or certificate of or by the City,or its employees or agents shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to dam ages herein provided. 18.10.4 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence,conversations,agreements,or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein;and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreem ents,or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document.Accordingly,the parties agree that no deviation from the 35 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC38 -9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D05E8A Contract No.24-234-01 terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written.It is further agreed that no modification,amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. 1811 CONTRACTOR'S COMPLIANCE WITH ANTI-HUMAN TRAFFICKING LAWS Contractor agrees to comply with Section 787.06,Florida Statutes,as may be amended from time to time,and has executed the Certification of Compliance with Anti-Human Trafficking Laws,as required by Section 787.06(13).Florida Statutes,a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 36 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D05E8A Contract No.24-234-02 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Ihe parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals,attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY: ttest Ra@in £.Graiaao.ciycer CONSULT ANT: CUMMlrrr_ERG~-INC. {iJ:,u"'IPresid•nO Jannek Cederberg,PE Print _January 30,2025 Date 37 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EXECUTION ollG Date Docusign Envelope ID:1 B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 SCHEDULE A CONSULT ANT SERVICE ORDER {CSO) CONSUL TANT SERVICE ORDER A/E Services E III EI )r I The City awarded the continuing contract for AIE services for a project whose estimated cost of construction does not exceed $7 5 mdlion The City awarded the continuing contract tor the study,planning activity.or other serices whose costs are estimated not to exceed $500.000 City.awarded project-specific contracts are not subject to CCNA limitations (or continuing contracts ly aeptrg the CS0 Consulta nt agrees to prowde seres pursuant to the attached proposal da ted and he terms,oon0ton s,and rates establis hed n the abve-referenced contract be tween he Ny and the Con sulta nt Con sultan t epb othy agre es tut no h er terms ad condtona h ad pby to the wo rk regardles s sf tether said oher terms and odetsnu are rduded hr ean or an any attachment to tha CSO Any devotion tom the scope of wok ag reed to herein shu ll equine »cha nge order appowed ty the Cy Estimated calendar days to complete the work Total amount ot otqnal C SO Iotal amount of ali previous Amendments 4 Total amount thus Amendment ,,Iota)mount for Enpoperent 6 Fee tor ancillary items for this Service Order c count ode A pproval of Mew Subconsuttants: If ane w subc on sulta nt is beg ad ded City M ana ger app roval rs req ui re d a Ea Notes Fo r City (M am e )Signature Date Project Admin 0ept Director procurement A/DCM CM m mLeadProjectAdmin. by tl gtlg.con»ut ts nt kc no w dgoa t at tri g to iu pot va d a d no wo n n ay coenn oc a t thy hn r M ud s pur s e otor tor th e 38 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360O5E8A Contract No.24-234-01 SCHEDULE B CONSUL TANT HOURLY RATE BILLING SCHEDULE TITLES HOURLY RATES Administrative Assistant $57.25 Assistant Engineer,Environmental $147.75 Associate Engineer $128.48 CAD Technician $89.96 CADD/Designer $145.18 Clerical $57.25 Coastal Engineer I $161.99 Coastal Engineer II $188.87 Environmental Engineer $165.20 Environmental Permit Specialist $89.96 Environmental Specialist $89.96 Environmental Technician $106.32 Grant Coordinator (Coastal Engineering)$210.71 Project Engineer $165.20 Project Manager $196.28 Project Principal $245.35 Project Scientist $171.74 Senior Engineer $196.28 Sr Coastal Engineer II $244.12 Structural Engineer $165.20 Structural Special Inspector $155.39 39 Docusign Envelope ID:1B2EC3B8-9CD9-475F-99C9-BAD6360D5E8A SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUB-CONSULTANTS 1.GCES Engineering Services 2.Miller Leg (MLA) 3.INT 40 Contract No.24-234-0l Contract No.24-234-01 SCHEDULED ANTI-HUMAN TRAFFICKING CERTIFICATION Affidavit of Compliance with Anti-Human Trafficking Laws Contract Number and Title: RFQ-2024-234-01-ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES Pursuant to section 787.06(13),Florida Statutes,this portion of the form must be completed by an officer or representative of the nongovernmental entity executing,renewing,or extending a contract with a governmental entity. Name of entity does not use coercion for labor or services as defined in section 787.06,Florida Statutes. Under penalties of perjury,I declare that I have read the foregoing statement and that the facts stated in it are true. Entity Name:B3 @ +m i "9 ,c- Representative/Officer's Printed Name: Representative/Officer's Title'/o- Signature:}jh }err- 41 Date: ATTACHMENT A RESOL UTION &COMMISSION AWARD MEMO RESOLUTION NO.2024-33356 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND,FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS; FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT & NICHOL,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS,on April 3,2024,the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of the Request for Qualifications (RFQ)No.2024-234-ND for Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines;and WHEREAS,Request for Qualifications No.2024-234-ND (the "RFQ")was released on April 4,2024;and WHEREAS,a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on April 17,2024;and WHEREAS,on May 28,2024,the City received proposals from the following firms for seawalls and living shores: Seawalls: •BCC Engineering,LLC •Cummins Cederberg,Inc. •GHD Services Inc. •Stantec Consulting Services Inc. •R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. •Kimley-Horn.and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: •Cummins Cederberg,Inc. •Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. •GHD Services Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc.;and WHEREAS,on May 29,2024,The City Manager,via Letter to Commission No.209- 2024,appointed an Evaluation Committee consisting of the following individuals:Eugene Egemba,Principal Engineer,Public Works Engineering Department;Matthew Lepera, Construction Manager,Public Works Engineering Department;Mariela Paez Castillo,Principal Engineer,Public Works Engineering Department;Lindsey Precht,Assistant Director, Environment and Sustainability Department;and Adalberto Viciedo,Chief Structural Engineer, Building Department;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Committee convened on June 17,2024,to review and score the proposals;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Committee received an overview of the project,information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance and the Government Sunshine Law,general information on the scope of services,and a copy of each proposal;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Committee process resulted in the ranking of proposers as follows: Seawalls: 1"ranked (tie)--BCC Engineering,LLC 1ranked (tie)-Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 3'ranked -GHD Services Inc. 4"ranked -Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5 ranked -R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. 6"ranked -AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 7th ranked -Kimley-Hom and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: 1°ranked (tie)-Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 1st ranked (tie)--Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. 3°ranked -GHD Services Inc. 4 ranked --AECOM Technical Services,Inc.;and WHEREAS,after reviewing all of the submissions and the Evaluation Committee's rankings and commentary,the City Manager,for the reasons set forth in the accompanying commission memorandum,reco mmended at the July 24,2024 Commission meeting that the Mayor and City Commission authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering,LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prim e/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent with BCC Engineering,LLC,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cumm ins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the seco nd best qualified consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the third best qualified co nsultant for seawalls;and further authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the seco nd best qualified co nsultant for living shorelines;further,if the Administration is not successful in neg otiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines;and further authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the Adm inistration;and WHEREAS,during the July 24,2024,Commission meeting,Commissioner Fernandez separated item C2 F from the Consent Agenda and referred it to the Finance and Econom ic Resiliency Committee (FERC)for further discussion;and WHEREAS,at the September 20,2024,FERC meeting,Co mmissioner Fern andez motioned to defer the item to the October 18,2024,meeting,requesting the Administration's final recom m endation,and it was unanimously approved;and WHEREAS,as requested by the Committee,the Administration reviewed its recom mendation and,at the October 18,2024,FERC meeting,confirmed that the recommendation was accurate and would remain unchanged;and WHEREAS,after discussion,FERC approved a recommendation to the City Commission to appro ve the City Manager's recom mendation from the July 24,2024, Comm ission meeting,pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234-ND for engineering services fo r seawalls and living shorelines. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager,pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)No.2024-234-ND for Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines;authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering, LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with BCC Engineering,LLC,authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls;and further authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for living shorelines;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines;and further authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this {0 day or _lveore 2024. ATTEST:7 N0V 2 2 2024 APPROVED AS TO FORM &LANGUAGE &FOR EX ECUTION ~,,J,&f ~Z.,.f- c)Md6#re,ea bate Rafael E.Granado,City Clerk_ Procurement Requests -C2 B MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM:Eric Carpenter,City Manager DATE:November 20,2024 TITLE:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER,PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)2024-234- ND FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES. (PUBLIC WORKS) RECOMMENDATION The City Administration ("Administration")recommends that the Mayor and City Commission ("City Commission")approve the Resolution. The solicitation is currently under the cone of silence BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City of Miami Beach is investing in infrastructure to reduce flood risk and adapt to climate change.As part of its resilience efforts,the City has updated multiple land use codes for new construction to address stormwater retention and setbacks and to increase base flood and freeboard requirements.Most recently,the City adopted an Ordinance entitled "Resiliency Standards for Tidal and Flood Protection",requiring all new seawalls,and those being reconstructed,to have a minimum elevation of 5.7 ft.North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVO 88). The City of Miami Beach has approximately 55 miles of seawalls,of which approximately 50 miles are privately owned,and 5 miles are City-owned.To optimize the benefits of the seawall program, the Public Works Department developed a methodology to prioritize the reconstruction of approximately 2.8 miles of City-owned seawalls within the next 10 years.Factors such as elevation,location,and condition of each seawall were used to develop the initial ranking of each seawall. The initial rankings were then adjusted to capture the benefits derived from contiguous private seawall segments.Essentially,by optimizing the elevation of public seawalls adjacent to extended private seawall segments,the City can mitigate additional flooding and encourage residents to reconstruct their seawalls.Thus,the ultimate focus of the seawall prioritization was to establish a continuous storm surge and overland flooding barrier throughout the City. The seawall prioritization was approved and adopted in 2021,and since then,the City has been working on executing the design and construction of prioritized segments.In 2021,the City also identified the most viable locations for implementing a living shoreline within existing City-owned shoreline segments.Living shoreline projects may utilize a variety of structural and organic materials,such as wetland plants,submerged aquatic vegetation,oyster reefs,sand fill,and stone. The City is interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above,to continue to carry out the Page 48 of 1993 planned improvements to the prioritized seawall segments.These planned improvements include a combination of conventional seawalls,hybrid seawalls,and living shorelines.The intent is to maximize sustainable and resilient solutions for our City. Accordingly,the Administration developed RFQ 2024-234-ND seeking proposals for the desired services. ANALYSIS On April 3,2024,the Mayor and the City Commission authorized the issuance of RFQ No.2024- 234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines.On April 4,2024,the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting a response was held on April 17,2024.One addendum was issued,and 101 prospective bidders accessed the advertised solicitation.RFQ responses were due and received on May 28,2024. The City received proposals from the following firms for seawalls and living shorelines: Seawalls: BCC Engineering,LLC Cummins Cederberg,Inc. •GHD Services Inc. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. •R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. •Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: •Cummins Cederberg,Inc. Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. GHD Services Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. On May 29,2024,the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via L TC #209-2024. The Evaluation Committee convened on June 17,2024,to consider the proposals received.The Committee was comprised of Eugene Egemba,Principal Engineer,Public Works Engineering Department;Matthew Lepera,Construction Manager,Public Works Engineering Department; Mariela Paez Castillo,Principal Engineer,Public Works Engineering Department;Lindsey Precht, Assistant Director,Environment and Sustainability Department;and Adalberto Viciedo,Chief Structural Engineer,Building Department. The Committee was provided an overview of the project,information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance,and the Government Sunshine Law.The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal.The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ.The results of the Evaluation Committee process are detailed in Attachment A and resulted in the following rankings Seawalls: 1st ranked (tie)-BCC Engineering,LLC 1st ranked (tie)-Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 3rd ranked --GHD Services Inc. 4th ranked -Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5th ranked -R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. 6th ranked -AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 7th ranked -Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: 1st ranked (tie)-Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 1st ranked (tie)--Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. 3rd ranked -GHD Services Inc. Page 49 of 1993 4th ranked -AECOM Technical Services,Inc. The Evaluation Committee process resulted in a tie for top rank for seawalls and living shorelines. BCC Engineering,LLC and Cummins Cederberg,Inc.were tied top-ranked in the seawall category.Cummins Cederberg,Inc.and Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.were tied top-ranked in the living shorelines category.After reviewing the submissions,the Evaluation Committee's rankings and commentary,and the City's experience with the tied firm s,the Administration recommends that the City negotiate with BCC Engineering as the best-qualified firm to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawall projects and Cummins Cederberg as the best-qualified firm to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shoreline projects. Awarding the contract to a single consultant for each discipline,such as the seawall and living shorelines,ensures continuity and cohesion throughout the project.When the City collaborates with consultants with a proven track record of successful work,it promotes a seamless workflow and consistency in quality.This approach will minimize potential communication issues and design misalignments that can arise from involving multiple consultants.In addition,having one consultant will foster trust and mutual understanding,which are crucial for efficiently addressing any challenges that may emerge during the project. While splitting the contract among multiple consultants might introduce diverse perspectives,the complexities of coordinating and integrating different consultants can lead to delays and inconsistencies in the final designs.Therefore,the benefits of maintaining continuity and cohesion with experienced,trusted consultants significantly outweigh the advantages of dividing the contract among several consultants.BCC Engineering and Cummins Cederberg have both demonstrated their ability to deliver outstanding results,and their selection as the sole consultants will be advantageous to the City. Lastly,the available workload and the volume of projects do not justify the engagement of two consultants at this time.The prime/lead consultants in each category should be able to complete all the designs as envisioned in the City's seawall prioritization plan. SEAWALLS The Evaluation Committee deemed BCC Engineering,LLC (BCC Engineering)as one of the best- qualified firms to provide engineering services for seawalls.The Evaluation Committee noted that BCC Engineering has not only completed similar projects for other municipalities in Florida but has also successfully completed various seawall projects for the City.This experience demonstrates a thorough understanding of the City's initiatives.The Evaluation Committee also highlighted BCC Engineering's familiarity with South Florida's structural landscape,which has been beneficial for past projects and will continue to be advantageous for future seawall projects.Finally,the approach and methodology outlined by BCC Engineering's Proposal was detailed and included a seawall evaluation matrix that is used to determine optimal solutions and a quality control and quality management plan that can reduce the workload for City staff. BCC Engineering,founded in Miami in 1994 as a local Florida-based firm ,has steadfastly dedicated itself to fulfilling the demands of both the private and public sector clientele.Its expertise lies in the realm of structural,planning,design,and construction management,encompassing a wide spectrum of services,including civil,environmental,site development,traffic engineering, multi-modal transit,complete streets,and highway engineering projects.Today,BBC Engineering is an award-winning firm with 385 employees and has delivered over $6 billion in 100+projects to date.Finally,BCC Engineering has assessed,repaired,and replaced Florida seawalls in Fort Lauderdale,Sarasota,and Miami-Dade County.All references provided positive feedback. The Evaluation committee also deemed Cummins Cederberg,Inc.(Cummins Cederberg),tied top-ranked proposer,and GHD Services Inc.,third-ranked proposer,well qualified and should be considered if the negotiations with BCC Engineering are not successful. Page 50 of 1993 Cummins and Cederberg,founded over 10 years ago,is an engineering firm that has and continues to exclusively focus on coastal and m arine pro jects.Its professional team is comprised of coastal engineers,m arine structural engineers,m arine biologists,regulatory and policy experts, m arine sci e ntists,and surv eyo rs w ith proven experience in all facets of coastal engine ering, environm ental planning,and regulatory fr am ew ork.C um m ins C ederberg has significa nt expe rie nce w ithin the C ity of M iam i Beach,w ith m ore than 40 w aterfront project s over the last 10 years,and the C ity has been satisfied w ith its w ork and offered positive feedback.F ina lly,its portfolio show cases a range of innovative and resilient seaw all pro ject s in B o ynton Beach, Pom pano B each,and H ighland B each,am ong others .A ll references pro vided positive feedback. G H D S e rv ices Inc.,establishe d in 19 28,is one of the w orld's leading pro fessional serv ices com pa nies.It operates in the glo bal m arkets of w ater,energy and resources,environm ent, property and buildings,and transport ation.It pro vides engineering,environm e ntal,advisory , digital,and construction serv ices.It has com pleted seaw all project s for Bisca yne Bay,the C ity of M iam i,and Indian C reek V illage ,am ong others.A ll references provided positive feedback. LI V IN G S H O R E LI N E S T he Evaluation C om m ittee deem e d C um m ins C ederb erg as one of the best-qualified firm s to provide eng ineering serv ices for living shorelines.T he E valuation C om m ittee noted that C um m ins C ederb erg has extensive local experie nce,incl uding living sho reline projects for the C ity at B each V iew Park,M id B each P ark,and W est 40th S treet.A dditionally,the C om m itt ee recognized that C um m ins C ede rberg conduct ed a C ityw ide living shoreline viability assessm e nt, w hich w as im plem ented and he lped secure a R esilie nt Flo rida G rant to fund the design, perm itt ing ,a nd constru ctio n of three living shoreline segm ents.C onsequently,it w ould benefit the C ity to have C um m ins C ederberg continue to support fu ture innovative,fundable ,and perm itt able living shoreline projects.Finally,the E valuatio n C o m m itt ee highlighted C um m ins C ede rb erg's com prehensive know ledge of the local pro cedures,regulatory pe rm itt ing requirem e nts,and innovative so lutions,such as 3D -printed artificial reef m odels and 3D habitat units,w hich contribute to building resilie nt and sustainable living shorelines. C um m ins and C ederberg,founded over 10 years ago ,is an engineering firm that has and continue s to exclusively focus on coastal and m arine pro jects.Its pro fessional team is com prised of coastal engineers,m arine structural engineers,m arine bio logists,regulatory and policy experts, m arine scie ntists,and surv eyors w ith pro ven experience in all facets of coastal engineering, environm ental planning,and regulatory fra m ew ork.C um m ins Cederberg has significant experie nce w ithin the C ity of M iam i Beach,w ith m ore than 40 w aterfront pro jects over the last 10 years,and the C ity has been satisfied w ith its w ork and off ered positive feedback.F inally,it has a de e p understanding of the unique coastal challe nges and enviro nm ental conditio ns characteristic of M iam i-D ade C o unty as it has com pleted living shoreline pro jects for the C ity of M iam i,the C ity of W est Palm Beach,and K ey B isca yne .A ll references provided positive feedback. T he Evaluation com m itt ee also deem ed M offatt &N icho l,Inc),tied top-ranked pro poser,and G H D S erv ices Inc.,third-ranked pro poser,w ell qualified and should be co nside red if the negotiatio ns w ith C um m ins and C ederberg are not successful. M o ff at &N icho l,Inc.w as founde d in Long Beach,C aliforn ia ,in 19 45 to pro vide design engineering serv ices to the evolving m aritim e industry ;m aking it one of the first engineering firm s in the w orld to em brace the concept of m o dern coastal engineering .It opened its M iam i offi ce in 19 94 and has since opened eight other offi ces.The firm curr ently has over 10 0 personne l,of w hich over 25 are coastal/m aritim e engineers and scientists.Its vast local experience incl udes being a part ne r and advisor to M iam i-D a de C ounty as the U S A rm y C orps of Engineers (U S A G E )m oves fo rw ard w ith the next phase of the B ack B ay C oastal S torm R isk M anagem ent (C S R M )study, advising N o rth B ay V illage on the planning of their Isla nd W alk project,and develo ping the draft tida l barrie r ordina nce fo r the V illage of Key Bisca yne .A ll references provided po sitive feedback. P age 51 of 19 93 GHD Services Inc.,established in 1928,is one of the world's leading professional services companies.It operates in the global markets of water,energy and resources,environment, property and buildings,and transportation.It provides engineering,environmental,advisory, digital,and construction services.It has completed living shoreline projects for Biscayne Bay,the City of Miami,and Ponce Inlet,among others.All references provided positive feedback. A Resolution to award RFQ 2024-234-ND was presented at the July 24,2024,Commission meeting.During this meeting,Commissioner Fernandez separated item C2 F (Attachment 8) from the Consent Agenda and referred it to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee (FERC)for further discussion (Attachment C).At the September 20,2024,FERC meeting, Commissioner Fernandez motioned to defer the item to the October 18,2024,meeting, requesting the Administration's final recommendation.Commissioner Magazine seconded the motion,and it was unanimously approved (Attachment D).As requested by the Committee,the Administration reviewed its recommendation and,at the October 18,2024,FERC meeting, confirmed that the recommendation was accurate and would remain unchanged. FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT The Public Works Department has budgeted $1,000,000 for these services.Fees will be established through the negotiation process.Services pursuant to the award of this RFQ shall be subject to successful negotiations and the availability of funds approved through the City's budgeting process.It is not anticipated that grant funding will be utilized for this project. Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate? (FOR ORDINANCES ONLY) If applicable,the Business Impact Estimate (BIE)was published on: See BIE at:https://www .miamibeachft.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/meeting-notices/ FINANCIAL INFORMATION 433-0815-061357-29-418-564-00-00-00-l1,000,000 29020 CONCLUSION On October 18,2024,after discussion,FERC approved a recommendation to the City Commission (Attachment E)to approve the City Manager's recommendation from the July 24, 2024,Commission meeting,pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234 -ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines. Based on the foregoing,it is recommended that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution accepting the City Manager's recommendation pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering,LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with BCC Engineering,LLC, authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc., authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls;and further authorizing the Page 52 of 1993 A dm inistration to enter into negotiations w ith C um m ins Cederberg,Inc.,as the pro poser determ ined to be the be st qualified to serv e as the prim e/lead consultant fo r living shorelines; further,if the A dm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent with Cum m ins C ederberg,Inc.,authorizing th e A dm inistration to enter into negotiations with M offatt &Nichol, Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the second best qualified consultant for living shorelines; further,if the A dm inistration is not successfu l in negotiating an agreem ent w ith Moffatt &Nichol, Inc.,authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiations with G HD Serv ices Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines.The Resolution also authorizes the C ity M anager and C ity C lerk to execute agreem ent(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the A dm inistration. Applicable Area C ityw ide Is this a "Residents Right to Know"item, pursuant to City Code Section2.172 No ts this item related to a G.O.Bond Project? No Was this Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which,as defined in Code Sec._2481, includes a principal engaged in lobbying?No If so,specify the nam e of lobbyist(s)and principal(s): Department Pro curem ent Sponsor(s} Co-sponsor(s) Condensed Title Award RFQ 2024-234-ND,Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines.PW/PR Page 53 of 1993 RFQ 2024-234 0 • En9lnoet1n8sOrvi::csforSNWillll eug,noEaomba I MIUhawl.apora r M.lri•lePou.Clttuno I UntboyPncht I AdalbfflnYlc\odg I Low f 4wig s»onto [[,,[],-•l l..l].[jg]%%7g"" Qualitathv»Quantita tuve Subtotal Qualttati vo Quant/tutho 8ubtotat Qualitative Quant'tat/v oe Subtota l Quslttathvo Quantitathve Subtota l Qualitathve Quantitatlve Subtotut -2E I±'±}=I±E±li#4'tag#Ant ill:if#f#±? Quantltuyo Polnts Volume o!Volume ot Vtan 's foll Guantitlv York Work Poirts Pints (Volume ot ark +Y«torn's) h dw.a l tre e $t94 t at ¢@z5cl];I L -; ottu on e $g u t.n o-·-.-- Page 54 of 1993 Prcpost RFQ 2024-234-ND l el el el eEngle@ringSericeforSeawalls.fog»Eemta [@,MatthrwLapora [Maret Par Caalto []'Lunday Pracht [gl Adstbsro Veckdo lg and LUvlng Shorines [[[i[rle[.,[a[,-.{& Qualtuthvas Quantltuthe Subtotal Qualtathv»QuartututNe Subtotal Qualrtzthvo Quantuthvo Subtotal Quafitutwve Quantitutvo 8ubtotal Qualitutwv»Quantitatlvo Subtotals#ft±##±#t t±lier±ft±± e-.,[ggrogato Teal»e Propoeo Quayalvg Polty votimsot ]Volumes!]Pean's ]Ttat quaitutwoWorkWorkPointsPolnts(Velumo e!Wark+Vturan's) i.uo.=,__..._...~__.nu•..1---·--1-~·---·'Svec».us ,t.MM!].s -+227=gem14--1;+} ~---•..t...._----·--=iL-'-!!~1!1----·---..l__-0 I _!,__ y wee 4Cope _i _'ts.tu 1 2[aew e-wen [4mmml_!L.s h - Page 55 of 1993 C2 FA RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND,FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING, LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL, INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION.(PUBLIC WORKS) Applicable Area: Page 56 of 1993 Procurement Requests -C2 F MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM:Rickelle Williams,Interim City Manager DATE:July 24,2024 TITLE:A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND,FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING, LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH sec ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH.MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL, INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION.(PUBLIC WORKS) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution accepting the City Manager's recommendation pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering,LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with BCC Engineering,LLC,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into Page 57 of 1993 negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls;and further authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the second best qualified consultant for living shorelines;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified co nsultant for living shorelines.The Resolution also authorizes the City Manager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. The solicitation is currently under the cone of silence. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The City of Miami Beach is investing in infrastructure to reduce flood risk and adapt to climate change.As part of its resilience efforts,the City has updated multiple land use codes for new construction to address stormwater retention and setbacks and to increase base flood and freeboard requirements.Most recently,the City adopted an Ordinance entitled "Resiliency Standards for Tidal and Flood Protection",requiring all new seawalls,and those being reconstructed,to have a minimum elevation of 5.7 ft.North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). The City of Miami Beach has approximately 55 miles of seawalls,of which approximately 50 miles are privately owned,and 5 miles are City-owned.To optimize the benefits of the seawall program, the Public Works Department developed a methodology to prioritize the reconstruction of approximately 2.8 miles of City-owned seawalls within the next 10 years.Factors such as elevation,location,and condition of each seawall were used to develop the initial ranking of each seawall. The initial rankings were then adjusted to ca pture the benefits derived from contiguous private seawall segments.Essentially,by optimizing the elevation of public seawalls adjacent to extended private seawall segments,the City can mitigate additional flooding and encourage residents to reconstruct their seawalls.Thus,the ultimate focus of the seawall prioritization was to establish a continuous storm surge and overland flooding barrier throughout the City. The seawall prioritization was approved and adopted in 2021,and since then,the City has been working on executing the design and construction of prioritized segments.In 2021,the City also identified the most viable locations for implementing a living shoreline within existing City-owned shoreline segments.Living shoreline projects may utilize a variety of structural and organic materials,such as wetland plants,submerged aquatic vegetation,oyster reefs,sand fill,and stone. The City is interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above,to continue to carry out the planned improvements to the prioritized seawall segments.These planned improvements include a co mbination of conventional seawalls,hybrid seawalls,and living shorelines.The intent is to maximize sustainable and resilient solutions for our City. Accordingly,the Administration developed RFQ 2024-234-ND seeking proposals for the desired services. ANALYSIS On April 3,2024,the Mayor and the City Commission authorized the issuance of RFQ No.2024- 234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines.On April 4,2024,the RFQ was issued.A voluntary pre-proposal conference to provide information to proposers submitting Page 58 of 1993 a response was held on April 17,2024.One addendum was issued,and 101 prospective bidders accessed the advertised solicitation.RFQ responses were due and received on May 28,2024. The City received proposals from the following firms for seawalls and living shorelines: Seawalls: BCC Engineering,LLC •Cummins Cederberg,Inc. •GHD Services Inc. •Stantec Consulting Services Inc. -R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. •Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: •Cummins Cederberg,Inc. •Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. GHD Services Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. On May 29,2024,the City Manager appointed the Evaluation Committee via L TC #209-2024. The Evaluation Committee convened on June 17,2024,to consider the proposals received.The Committee was comprised of Eugene Egemba,Principal Engineer,Public Works Engineering Department;Matthew Lepera,Construction Manager,Public Works Engineering Department; Mariela Paez Castillo,Principal Engineer,Public Works Engineering Department;Lindsey Precht, Assistant Director,Environment and Sustainability Department;and Adalberto Viciedo,Chief Structural Engineer,Building Department. The Committee was provided an overview of the project,information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance,and the Government Sunshine Law.The Committee was also provided with general information on the scope of services and a copy of each proposal.The Committee was instructed to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ.The results of the Evaluation Committee process are detailed in Attachment A and resulted in the following rankings Seawalls: 1st ranked (tie)-BCC Engineering,LLC 1st ranked (tie)-Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 3rd ranked -GHD Services Inc. 4th ranked -Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5th ranked --R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. 6th ranked -AECOM Technical Services,Inc. 7th ranked --Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: 1st ranked (tie)-Cummins Cederberg,Inc. 1st ranked (tie)--Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. 3rd ranked -GHD Services Inc. 4th ranked -AECOM Technical Services,Inc. The Evaluation Committee process resulted in a tie for top rank for seawalls and living shorelines. BCC Engineering,LLC and Cummins Cederberg,Inc.were tied top-ranked in the seawall category.Cummins Cederberg,Inc.and Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.were tied top-ranked in the living shorelines category.After reviewing the submissions,the Evaluation Committee's rankings and commentary,and the City's experience with the tied firms,the Administration recommends that the City negotiate with BCC Engineering as the best-qualified firm to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawall projects and Cummins Cederberg as the best-qualified firm to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shoreline projects. Page 59 of 1993 Awarding the contract to a single consultant for each discipline,such as the seawall and living shorelines,ensures continuity and cohesion throughout the project.When the City collaborates with consultants with a proven track record of successful work,it promotes a seamless workflow and consistency in quality.This approach will minimize potential communication issues and design misalignments that can arise from involving multiple consultants.In addition,having one consultant will foster trust and mutual understanding,which are crucial for efficiently addressing any challenges that may emerge during the project. While splitting the contract among multiple consultants might introduce diverse perspectives,the complexities of coordinating and integrating different consultants can lead to delays and inconsistencies in the final designs.Therefore,the benefits of maintaining continuity and cohesion with experienced,trusted consultants significantly outweigh the advantages of dividing the contract among several consultants.BCC Engineering and Cummins Cederberg have both demonstrated their ability to deliver outstanding results,and their selection as the sole consultants will be advantageous to the City. Lastly,the available workload and the volume of projects do not justify the engagement of two consultants at this time.The prime/lead consultants in each category should be able to complete all the designs as envisioned in the City's seawall prioritization plan. SEAWALLS The Evaluation Committee deemed BCC Engineering,LLC (BCC Engineering)as one of the best- qualified firms to provide engineering services for seawalls.The Evaluation Committee noted that BCC Engineering has not only completed similar projects for other municipalities in Florida but has also successfully completed various seawall projects for the City.This experience demonstrates a thorough understanding of the City's initiatives.The Evaluation Committee also highlighted BCC Engineering's familiarity with South Florida's structural landscape,which has been beneficial for past projects and will continue to be advantageous for future seawall projects.Finally,the approach and methodology outlined by BCC Engineering's Proposal was detailed and included a seawall evaluation matrix that is used to determine optimal solutions and a quality control and quality management plan that can reduce the workload for City staff. BCC Engineering,founded in Miami in 1994 as a local Florida-based firm,has steadfastly dedicated itself to fulfilling the demands of both the private and public sector clientele.Its expertise lies in the realm of structural,planning,design,and construction management,encompassing a wide spectrum of services,including civil,environmental,site development,traffic engineering, multi-modal transit,complete streets,and highway engineering projects.Today,BBC Engineering is an award-winning firm with 385 employees and has delivered over $6 billion in 100+projects to date.Finally,BCC Engineering has assessed,repaired,and replaced Florida seawalls in Fort Lauderdale,Sarasota,and Miami-Dade County.All references provided positive feedback. The Evaluation committee also deemed Cummins Cederberg,Inc.(Cummins Cederberg),tied top-ranked proposer,and GHD Services Inc.,third-ranked proposer,well qualified and should be considered if the negotiations with BCC Engineering are not successful. Cummins and Cederberg,founded over 10 years ago,is an engineering firm that has and continues to exclusively focus on coastal and marine projects.Its professional team is comprised of coastal engineers,marine structural engineers,marine biologists,regulatory and policy experts, marine scientists,and surveyors with proven experience in all facets of coastal engineering, environmental planning,and regulatory framework.Cummins Cederberg has significant experience within the City of Miami Beach,with more than 40 waterfront projects over the last 10 years,and the City has been satisfied with its work and offered positive feedback.Finally,its portfolio showcases a range of innovative and resilient seawall projects in Boynton Beach, Pompano Beach,and Highland Beach,among others.All references provided positive feedback. Page 60 of 1993 GHD Services Inc.,established in 1928,is one of the world's leading professional services com panies.It operates in the global markets of water,energy and resources,environment, property and buildings,and transportation.It provides engineering,enviro nmental,advisory , digital,and construction services.It has completed seawall project s for Biscayne Bay,the City of Miam i,and Indian Creek Village,am ong others.All references provided positive feedback. LIVING SHO RELINES The Evaluation Committee deemed Cummins Cederberg as one of the best-qualified firms to provide engineering services for living shorelines.The Evaluation Committee noted that Cum m ins Cederberg has ext ensive local experience ,including living shoreline projects for the City at Beach View Park,M id Beach Park,and West 40th Street.Additionally,the Committee recognized that Cum mins Cederberg conducted a Citywide living shoreline viability assessment, which was implemented and helped secure a Resilient Florida Grant to fund the design, permitting,and construction of three living shoreline segments.Consequently,it would benefit the City to have Cummins Cederberg continue to support future innovative,fundable,and permittable living shoreline projects.Finally,the Evaluation Committee highlighted Cummins Cederberg's com prehensive knowledge of the local procedures,regulatory permitting requirem ents,and innovative solutions,such as 3D-printed artificial reef m odels and 30 habitat units,which contribute to building resilient and sustainable living shorelines. Cum m ins and Cederberg,founded over 10 years ago,is an engineering firm that has and continues to exclusively focus on coastal and marine projects.Its professional team is com prised of coastal engineers,m arine structural engineers,marine biologists,regulatory and policy experts, marine scientists,and surveyors with pro ven experience in all facets of coastal engineering, environm ental planning,and regulatory framework.Cum m ins Cederberg has significant experience within the City of Miam i Beach,with more than 40 waterfront projects over the last 10 years,and the City has been satisfied with its work and offered positive feedback.Finally,it has a deep understanding of the unique coastal challenges and environmental conditions characteristic of Miam i-Dade County as it has com pleted living shoreline pro jects for the City of Miam i,the City of W est Palm Beach,and Key Biscayne.All references pro vided positive feedback. The Evaluation com m ittee also deem ed Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,tied top-ranked proposer,and G HD Services Inc.,third-ranked proposer,well qualified and should be considered if the negotiations with Cum m ins and Cederberg are not successf ul. Moffat &Nichol,Inc.was founded in Long Beach,California,in 1945 to provide design engineering serv ices to the evolving maritim e industry ;making it one of the first engineering firms in the world to em brace the concept of modern coastal engineering.It opened its Miam i offi ce in 1994 and has since opened eight other offi ces.The firm currently has over 100 personnel,of which over 25 are coastal/m aritim e engineers and scientists.Its vast local experience includes being a partner and advisor to Miami-Dade County as the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAG E)moves forw ard with the next phase of the Back Bay Coastal Storm Risk Managem ent (CSRM )study, advising North Bay Village on the planning of their Island W alk project ,and developing the draft tidal barrier ordinance for the Village of Key Biscayne.All references provided positive feedback. G HD Serv ices Inc.,established in 1928,is one of the world's leading professional serv ices com panies.It operates in the global markets.of water,energy and resources,environm ent, property and buildings,and transportation.It pro vides engineering,enviro nm ental,advisory , digital,and construction services.It has completed living shoreline projects for Biscayne Bay,the City of Miam i,and Ponce Inlet,am ong others.All references provided positive feedback. FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT The Public W orks Department has budgeted $1,000,000 for these serv ices.Fees will be established thro ugh the negotiation process.Services pursuant to the award of this RFQ shall be Page 61 0f 1993 subject to successful negotiations and the availability of funds approved through the City's budgeting process.It is not anticipated that grant funding will be utilized for this project. Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate? (FOR ORDINANCES ONLY) The Business Impact Estimate (BIE)was published on .See BIE at: https://www .miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/meeting-notices/ FINANCIAL INFORMATION 433-0815-061357-29-418-564-00-00-00- 29020 CONCLUSION $1,000,000 Based on the foregoing,it is recommended that the Mayor and City Commission approve the Resolution accepting the City Manager's recommendation pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines,authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiations w ith BCC Engineering,LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serv e as the prim e/lead consultant for seaw alls;further,if the A dm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent w ith B C C E ngineering,LLC , authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiations w ith C um m ins C ederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the second best qualified consultant for seaw alls;fu rther,if the A dm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent w ith C um m ins C ederberg,Inc., authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiations w ith G H D S erv ices Inc.,as the pro poser determ ined to be the third best qualified consultant for seaw alls;and furt her authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiations w ith C um m ins C ederberg,Inc.,as th e pro poser determ ine d to be th e best qua lified to se rv e as the prim e/lead consultant for living shorelines; furt her,if the A dm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent w ith C um m ins C ederberg,Inc.,authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiations w ith M off att &N ichol, Inc.,as the proposer determ ine d to be the second best qualified consultant for living shorelines; further,if the A dm inistration is not successfu l in negotiating an agreem ent w ith M off att &N ichol, Inc.,authorizing the A dm inistration to enter into negotiatio ns w ith G H D S erv ices Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines.The R esolution also authorizes the C ity M anager and C ity C lerk to execute agreem e nt(s)upon the conclusio n of successful ne gotiations by the A dm inistration. Applicable Area C ityw ide Is this a "Residents Right to Know"item, pursuant to City Code Section 2-17? N o Is this item related to a G.O.Bond Project? N o Was this Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which,as defined in Code Sec.2-481, includes a principal engaged in lobbying?No Page 62 of 19 93 If so,specify the name of lobbyist(s)and principal(s): Department Procurement Sponsor(s) Co-sponsor(s) Condensed Title Award RFQ 2024-234-ND,Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines PW/PR Page 63 of 1993 ATTACHMENT A -SEAWAL.S RFQ 2024-234-0 {+z ~Mariela Par Castillo .,ta a Low gEng/neer/ng 8arias far Segal/g Eugono Egomba Matthew Lepera .Llndsoy Precht 5 Adattorto Vtcheda .2 5 2 3 c\and Luing shone,Ge .i !4 3 5laQualitatvoQuantltat/ve Subtotal QualitatMve Quatttatlve I 8ubtotal Quaftatlva Quantltatlve 8btotal Qualltatha {Quant/tathvo Subtotal Qualitative Quantitatvo [Subtotal[GSEahors.tc 89 3 92 2 96 3 99 1 75 3 7 4 91 3 4 1 90 3 I 93 2 10 1 «{c,3@rpgrg.I¢91 ,·--~t #%'8.--2-9 5 3 08 2 UU t 3 0 2 a 1s»2,10 1G\1DS9riv»Jc -+Pa 5 4 ,a6 2 70 5 15.5 2 I 5 a7 H4 96.-?4 191 I1 !+St39.ansngSorvlsIo .-8 7 1 n 3%----1 £6 97 a 0 1 5 I 'AA !$H-2-86-[R,90hr.4many.los,--77 5 o 5 R7 5 40 5 45 7 7 5 e3 ,¢±#-4 27 ,S[A£QM.T nnlalSorvig,Is.A6 0 5 5,90 0 a0 4 73 D 7a 16 74 'D 74 7 %6 28 6(Kimler-omand Asoxiotos.In.,-78 0 78 7 2 0 82.1 97 0 97 11 79 n r8 ,6 0 81 7 30 T Quantitat ivo Polnt Prop0osor Valuma of Vokra of Vetern's Tot/Quant'tuthvo Wort Work Palts Palla (Votumo ol Work +Veteran's) .MJesevees.t 3.m1.411 '''·-,,,1.11 .n+1 gee eSmee.±...4.1mt,1n.±.---·3 0E·-$0 P9Moe,he t @.1a 3.34 0 ~·-±.1my»u .'e r21.mes .J 1..222199 $t Page 64 of 1993 ATTACHMENT A-LIVING SHORELINES RF0 2024-234D0 g a ..5 .., Englneoring Servicos for Seawalls Eugene Egomba Mathew Lopoa""".Ma rola Peaz Castlllo Lindsey Precht •Adalberto Vcledo #tow 8 52 5 R2 rs#aandLingshore!in@g ~i 5 5 Qualitatlvo Quantitatlvo Subtotal Qual itatlvo Quantita tive Subtotal qual itatlvo aumntluthvo 8u±total Quall tat/va {Quant/tattve subtotal Qul itatlvo Q uan ti tot Nv o [8ubtotal « CummlrsCogorbgg,Inc.-..89 3 %2 2 94 3 97 ,99 3 02 1 90 3 03 9 93 -;L3./?}+! ; !!iilll..fil<h<>I...LI)!;.___on 5 =1 8 5 --~09 ,97 90 5 95 1 ""4¢ 2 Sorvig lc,·ss 5 a0 4 %%?2 ~---K 100 82 ,-87 3 92 5 g7 2 13 2 QM Tohnical Sams,I o,_-+91-9 g1 3 r-a 4 74 n 74.-'74 n 74 4 an n I 10 4 1 4 Quantitativo Polntg Prop0user Volume at Volume of Votoran's Tatu!Quant/tatlvo Work Work Points Polnts [Volume ofWork +Veteran's) our-g ypq gr 'm [SeoGett.h ,gt19as1 'lune.'4Must ..9 Page 65 of 1993 0MB Available Balances as of 7/15/2024 RFQ for Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines Procurement Requests -C2 {{item.number}} MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: TITLE: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission Rickelle Williams,Interim City Manager July 24,2024 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER,PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RF0)2024-234- ND FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES (PUBLIC WORKS) FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT The Public Works Department has budgeted S1,000,000 for these services.Fees will be established through the negotiation proces s.Services pursuant to the award of this RFQ shall be subject to successful negotiations and the availability of funds approved through the City's budgeting process.It is not anticipated that grant funding will be utilized for this project. Does_thts_Ordinancg rgqulrgausingss impact Estimate? (FOR ORDINANCES ONLY) The Business Impact Estimate (BIE)was published on.See BIE at: httpsyAyyy_miamibeachf.govict-hall/city_c!erk/meeting-notices! FINANCIAL INFORMAT1gN ~33-0815-061357-29418-564~~0-I[29020 [S1,000,000----------~ ccount t tear Comparison A-rows«rs«a rs: s-0,M2 > _CJ . •DO Account Net» ·7616 .a ',135.70304 0 00 3 1,615,p948 15.007.792 96.27.s 'mg. as9.- 1,101,11.64 3182 31.000 .00 t +sz00 o0 '. os 's' 13,400 00 264.090 9,_y oo A! 479 309 04 3721 151,950 00 t2 220,000 00 I '•171950 00 so.5s00 _ 0o. 311.000.00 16.39 00 Iz 06 M 00 ' co '!» .00 .GO 00 ta 972485.a4 'as 00 1,0/2,485 84 ·9»s a 16.527.ss +z.37 90 ._a' 1,101,161 64 44 1' Page 66 of 1993 RESOLUTION NO._ A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND,FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS; FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC., AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT & NICHOL,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. WHEREAS,on April 3,2024,the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of the Request for Qualifications (RFO)No.2024-234-ND for Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines;and WHEREAS,Request for Qualifications No.2024-234-ND (the "RFQ")was released on April 4,2024;and WHEREAS,a voluntary pre-proposal meeting was held on April 17,2024;and WHEREAS,on May 28,2024,the City received proposals from the following firms for seawalls and living shores: Seawalls: •BCC Engineering,LLC •Cummins Cederberg,Inc. Page 67 of 1993 •G HD Serv ices Inc. •Stantec Consulting Services Inc. •R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. •AECOM Technical Services,Inc. •Kimley-Hom and Associates,Inc. Living Shorelines: •Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc. •Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. •G HD Serv ices Inc. •AECO M Technical Serv ices,Inc.;and WHEREAS,on May 29,2024,the City Manager,via Letter to Commission No.209- 2024,appointed an Evaluation Com m ittee consisting of the following individuals:Eugene Egem ba,Principal Engineer,Public W orks Engineering Department;M atthew Lepera, Constru ction M anager,Public W orks Engineering Department;M ariela Paez Castillo,Principal Engineer,Public W orks Engineering Department;Lindsey Precht.Assistant Director, Enviro nm ent and Sustainability Department;and Adalberto Vi ciedo,Chief Structural Engineer, Building Departm ent;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Comm ittee convened on June 17,2024,to review and score the proposals;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Com m ittee received an overv iew of the project,information relative to the City's Cone of Silence O rdinance and the G overn ment Sunshine Law,general information on the scope of serv ices,and a copy of each proposal;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Com m ittee was instru cted to score and rank each proposal pursuant to the evaluation criteria established in the RFQ ;and WHEREAS,the Evaluation Com m ittee process resulted in the ranking of pro posers as fo llows: Seawalls: 1"ranked (tie)-BCC Engineering,LLC 1"ranked (tie)-Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc. 34 ranked -G HD Serv ice s Inc. 4"ranked --Stantec Consulting Serv ices Inc. 5"ranked -R.J.Behar &Company,Inc. 6"ranked --AECO M Technical Serv ices,Inc. 7th ranked -Kim ley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Li ving Shorelines: 1°'ranked (tie)-Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc. 1st ranked (tie)--Moffatt &Nichol,Inc. 34 ranked -G HD Serv ice s Inc. 4"ranked -AECO M Technical Serv ices,Inc.;and WHEREAS,after reviewing all of the subm issions and the Evaluation Com m ittee's rankings and com m entary ,the City Manager,for the reasons set forth in the acc om panying com m ission mem orandum ,recom mends that the M ayor and City Com m ission authorize the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering,LLC,as the pro poser determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prim e/lead consultant fo r seawalls;further,if the Adm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with BCC Engineering,LLC, Page 68 of 1993 authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg,Inc.,as the pro poser determ ined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls;further,if the Adm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent with Cum mins Ce derberg,Inc., authorizing the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with G HD Services Inc.,as the pro poser determ ined to be the third best qualified consultant fo r seawalls;and further authorizing the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with Cumm ins Cederberg,Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the best qualified to serv e as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines; further,if the Adm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc.,authorizing the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with M offatt &Nichol, Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second bes t qualified consultant fo r living shorelines; further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with M offatt &Nichol, Inc.,authorizing the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with G HD Services Inc.,as the pro poser to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines;and further authorizing the interim City Manager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the Adm inistration. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEA CH,FLORIDA,that the Mayor and City Com m ission hereby accept the recom m endation of the City Manager,pursuant to Request for Q ualifica tions (RFQ )No.2024-234-ND for Engineering Serv ices for Seawalls and Li ving Shorelines;authorize the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering,LLC, as the pro poser determ ined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Adm inistration is not successfu l in negotiating an agreement with BCC Engineering,LLC,authorize the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc.,as the pro poser determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls;further,if the Adm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent with Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc.,authorize the Adm inistra tion to enter into negotiations with G HD Serv ices Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls; and further authorize the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg, Inc.,as the pro poser determined to be the best qualified to serv e as the prime/lead co nsultant for living shorelines;further,if the Adm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreem ent with Cum m ins Cederberg,Inc.,authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,as the proposer determ ined to be the second best qualified co nsultant for livi ng shorelines;further,if the Adm inistration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,authorize the Adm inistration to enter into negotiations with G HD Serv ice s Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified co nsultant fo r living shorelines;and further authorize the interim City M anager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the concl usion of successful negotiations by the Adm inistration. PASSED AND ADOPTED this dayof 2 024. Steven Meiner,Mayor ATTEST: Rafael E.G ranado,City Clerk APPRO VED AS TO FO RM &LA NG UAG E &FO~ECUTIO N h//zez-~~~---City Attorney :a Date Page 69 of 1993 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY RICARDO J.DOPICO City Attorney F L 0 R D A Telephone: Facsimile: (305)673-7470 (305)673-7002 July 23,2024 Via e-Mail:dmoscoso@beckerlawyers.com David J.Moscoso,Esq. 2525 Ponce De Leon Boulevard,Suite 825 Coral Gables,FL 33134-6051 RE:Response to Bid Protest Relating to Request for Qualifications No.2024-234- ND,Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines (the "RFQ")on behalf of Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.(the "Client"or "Moffatt"),pursuant to Section 2- 371 (2)of the City of Miami Beach Code. Dear Mr.Moscoso: The City has reviewed the bid protest you filed on July 19,2021 on behalf of your Client. Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.("Moffatt"),with regard to the City Manager's award recommendation pursuant to the RFQ.After reviewing the particulars upon which Moffatt's protest has been submitted,the City hereby rejects Moffatt's protest and,in support thereof,finds as follows. Background Moffatt's protest claims "[t]he City Manager's decision to recommend an award of the RFQ to Cummins Cederberg was not exercised upon clearly defined criteria and is arbitrary and capricious,"and also that the City Manager "failed to provide a clearty defined criteria for deciding an award recommendation in the event of a tie between two proposers for the RFQ and made its decision based on criteria which was established outside of the RFQ specification."Moffatt further argues the City Manager considered factors outside of the RFQ specifications and in the process gave preference to the recommended bidder. The City Manager's Authority and the Role of the Evaluation Committee Moffit's protest mischaracterizes the City Manager's award process and fails to acknowledge the City Manager's broad discretion in making an award recommendation,as outlined in the RFQ.To describe the City Manager's award recommendation as a "tie breaker"misconstrues the roles of the City Manager and the Evaluation Committee.In making an award recommendation,the City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the 1700 Convention Center Drive Fourth Floor -Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Page 70 0f 1993 David J.Moscoso,Esq. July 23,2024 Page2 Evaluation Committee's rankings.Rather,the City Manager's recommendation is intended to encompass a holistic assessment of each bidder's overall qualifications. The City Manager's authority and discretion in recommending an award to the Mayor and City Commission is granted by Section 2-369 of the City of Miami Beach City Code,which is referenced in Section 0100,12 (Determination of Award)of the RFQ.Section 2-369 of the code states "[i]n determining the ...best bidder ...[the City Manager shall consider]"'the following: (1)the ability,capacity and skill of the Bidder to perform the contract; (2)whether the bidder can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference; (3)the character,integrity,reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Bidder; (4)the quality of performance of previous contracts;and (5)the previous and existing compliance by the Bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. Furthermore,Section 0100,12,of the RFQ clearly states that the City Manager's recommendation need not align strictly with the Evaluation Committee's findings and,in addition to the factors listed in Section 2-369,may consider other information deemed relevant in making a recommendation to City Commission.Thus,consideration of a bidder's performance under previous contracts was not arbitrary and capricious,nor should information included in the RFQ and City Code be described as "an unwritten bias"or as a consideration that was not identified in the RFQ specifications. By placing too much emphasis on the results of the Evaluation Committee,Moffatt incorrectly conflates its favorable Evaluation Committee ranking with a guaranteed outcome.Moffatt disagrees with the results of the RFQ and finds that its own credentials provide no rational basis for an award to anyone other than itself.However,Florida courts have repeatedly made clear that,in reviewing challenges to a public agency's procurement decisions,a "public body has wide discretion"in the bidding process and "its decision,when based on an honest exercise"of the discretion,should not be overturned "even if it may appear erroneous and even if reasonable persons may disagree."Department of Transportation v. Groves-Watkins Constructors,530 S0.2d 912,913 (Fla.1988)(quoting Liberty County • Baxter's Asphalt &Concrete,Inc.,421 So.2d 505 (Fla.1982))(emphasis in original)."[The] sole responsibility is to ascertain whether the agency acted fraudulently,arbitrarily,illegally, or dishonestly."Groves-Watkins,530 So.2d at 914.The City Manager made an award recommendation clearly within her discretion and in accordance with the terms of the RFQ and City Code. 'Because this solicitation is a request for qualifications,where prices and bids are not collected, certain references to "price"and the "lowest"bidder have been omitted from the quoted language for the avoidance of confusion. 1700 Convention Center Drive Fourth Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Page 71 of 1993 David J.Moscoso,Esq. July 23,2024 Page3 For the reasons set forth above,the City denies Moffatt's protest.Moffatt may appeal this decision by filing an original action in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County,Florida,in accordance with the applicable court rules.Any action not brought in good faith shall be subject to sanctions including damages suffered by the City and attorney's fees incurred by the City in defense of such wrongful action. Sincerely, Ricardo J.Dopico City Attorney cc:Mayor Steven Meiner and Members of the City Commission Rickelle A.Williams,Interim City Manager Rafael Granado,City Clerk Kristy Bada,Interim Procurement Director 1700 Convention Center Drive Fourth Floor-Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Page 72 of 1993 David J.Moscoso Attorney at Law Phone:305.260.1003 Fax:305.442.2232 dmoscoso@beckerlawyers.com Becker &Poliakoff 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd,Suite 825 Coral Gables,FL 33134 July 19,2024 Via electronic mail:Rickelleyilliamns@miamibeachf]_gov Becker Re:Bid protest letter to the City Miami Beach (the "City")on behalf of Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.(the "Client"or "Moffat"),pursuant to Section 2-371(2)of the City of Miami Beach Code.Providing the City with notice of deviations from the competitive solicitation guidelines and violations of established case law precedent in Florida. Dear Ms Williams: The undersigned firm has the privilege of representing Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.("Moffatt" or "Client").Our Client has asked us to provide you with a letter detailing several instances in which the City has failed to uphold its duties under the Code and established case law. Supporting documentation in favor of the claims made on behalf of D.L Porter Constructors,Inc. is submitted with this response. I.BACKGROUND The City of Miami Beach (the "City"or "Miami Beach")issued a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ),RFQ No.2024-234-ND,titled "Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines"in April of 2024.On July 17,2024 the City issued an Award Notification pursuant to the RFQ.The Award Notification notified Moffett that the City Manager will be recommending to the Mayor and City Commission at its July 24,2024 meeting for the Commission approve a resolution accepting two recommendations,one for engineering services for seawalls and another for engineering services for living shorelines,and to approve the administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering,LLC for seawalls and Cummins &Cederberg,Inc.for living shorelines. The Evaluation Committee process resulted in a tie for top rank for seawalls and living shorelines.BCC Engineering,LLC and Cummins Cederberg,Inc.("Cederberg")were tied top- ranked in the seawall category.Cummins Cederberg,Inc.and Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.were tied top-ranked in the living shorelines category.After reviewing the submissions,the Evaluation Committee's rankings and commentary,and the City's experience with the tied firms,the Administration recommended that the City negotiate Cummins Cederberg as the prime/lead consultant for living shoreline projects. www.beckerlawyers.com Florida [New Jersey [New York ]Washington,D.C. Page 73 of 1993 2 The Evaluation Committee deemed Cummins Cederberg as one of the best-qualified firms to provide engineering services for living shorelines.The Manager's position expressed in the Award Notification is that it would benefit the City to have Cummins Cederberg as the awardee based on their past experience in working with the City and their experience in local projects.However,the Evaluation Committee also deemed Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,as a tied top- ranked proposer and noted Moffat &Nichol,Inc.also has several local projects which were specific to shorelines. Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.submits this letter on July 19,2024. II.LEGALSTANDARD Although public authorities have wide discretion in awarding public contracts through a competitive procurement process,that discretion,"must be exercised based upon clearly defined criteria,and mav not be exercised arbitrarilv or capriciouslv."Liberty County v.Baxter 's Asphalt &Concrete,Inc.,421 So.2d 505 (Fla.1982)(emphasis added); Emerald Correctional Management v.Bay County Bd.Of County Commissioners,955 So.2d 647 (Fla.1st DCA 2007).Public authorities cannot exercise that discretion in a manner that is arbitrary,capricious,dishonest,fraudulent,unreasonable,or in any other way that would subvert or undermine the purpose and object of competitive bidding.D.O.T.v.Groves-Watkins Constructors,530 S0.2d912,913-14 (Fla.1988);Caber Systems v.Department of General Services,530 So.2d 325,336 (Fla.1st DCA 1988).A contract let without regard to required bidding is void and payments may be enjoined.Wester v.Belote,103 Fla.976,138 So.721 (1931).A public entity may not reserve the right to modify the specifications,because to do so would permit favoritism and prevent an equal comparison of bids.Id. No fair comparison of bids may be made unless all bidders are responding to the same specifications.When an invitation to bid lacks definite specifications,a trio of bid violations occurs:each bidder is free to submit bids on what amounts to the bidder's own scope of the work;the agency cannot make an adequate evaluation;and the agency must arbitrarily choose the successful bidder.·Any one of the foregoing defects will render a contract void Id.;Glastein v.City of Miami,399 So.2d 1005 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). A public entity may not avoid the competitive bidding requirement of its charter by amending a contract properly let through competitive bidding.Robert G.Lassiter &Co.v. Taylor,99 Fla.819,128 128 S0.14 (1930),69 A.L.R.689. Material variances are those that give one bidder a substantial advantage over the other bidders and restrict competition.Nonmaterial variances are those that do not affect price,give one bidder an advantage or benefit not enjoyed by other bidders,or adversely affect the interests of the agency.Tropabest Foods,Inc.wv.State,Dept.of General Services,493 So.2d 50 (Fla.1st DCA 1986). "A capricious action is one taken without thought or reason or irrationally.An arbitrary decision is one not supported by facts or logic."Agrico Chem.Co.v.Dep 't of Envr.Reg.,365 Page 74 of 1993 '1 So 2d 759 763 (Fla.Ist DCA 1978)In_the_contract_procurement_contet._whether an_action a_arbitrary_or capricious depends upon_hgtherthe_guarding authority complied_ith it_o n_proposal criteria_See_Acad Express_LL__Brouard _it53So3D[I88_Ela_Athy DC_A201]Emphasis added) If an agency fails to observe pre-established specifications,or its code,"that action will render meaningless the basis upon which bids were initially sought,and so must be deemed arbitrary.illegal,fraudulent,or dishonest."MI Telecommunications Corp.v Dept of Corrections,1995 WL 1053092 Fla Di Admin Hrgs )Emphasis added) Ill.PROTEST A.The City Manager's decision to recommend an award of the RFO to Cummins Cederberg was not exercised upon clearly defined criteria and is arbitrary and capricious. a.The City Manager failed to provide a clearly defined criteria for deciding an award recommendation in the event of a tie between two proposers for the RFO and made its decision based on criteria which was established outside of the RFQ specifications. The specifications for the RFQ were provided to all Bidders at the same time on April 04. 2024 The specifications for this RF W provided clear proposal evaluation criteria in Section 0400 of the RFO guidelines,titled "Proposal Evaluation"Section 0400 provided a clearly defined evaluation criteria in sub-section 7 of the Proposal E valuation Criteria.titled Determination of Final Ranking"The evaluation criteria for a determination of final ranking provided to all Bidders was as follows 7 DETERMINATION OF FINAL RANKING Ihe sum of the evaluation cntena points will be converted to rankings n accordance wth the example below aer A Bidder Bidder C Quaitate Points 82 74 80 onmrwttee Quanttattve Punts s 5 a Merer t Toal 37 73 30 tank 4 3 2 2uatat ve Punt 32 3 72 Comnmttee Quanttat«e Pont 5 5 0 emnber 2 Tctat 87 90 72 Rani 1 2 3 Qusi4taste Pants 90 74 66 C arrrttee Qu snttat e Punts»£€3 2 ember 2 Tora!95 rg 66us123 ow Aggregate Score J 9 8 Final Ranking'1 a 1 The determination of final rankings also notes that the results of the proposal evaluation process in accordance with Section 0400 does not represent an award recommendation and that the City Manager may use any other information he deems appropriate to develop an award Page 75 of 1993 recommendation to the tty ommtsston,which may differ from the results of the proposal evaluation process and final rankings"No further elaboration,specification,or definition for the City Manager s criteria for developing the award recommendation was provided to the Bidders Following the Evaluation Committee 's sum of the evaluation criteria points.Moffet and Cederberg were determined to be in a tie even though Moffet was given more first place votes by the Committee Members.However.because the RF)specifications provide that the Evaluation Committee s decrston is not an award recommendation.the scores were simply passed to the City Manager and the Evaluation Committee s participaton in the competitive process ended The City Manager then proceeded to break the tie and make an award recommendation to Cederberg based on the fact their significant experience with the City of Miami Beach and their "deep understanding of the unique coastal challenges and environmental conditions characteristic of Miami-Dade County"However,nothing contained in the RFQ specifications provided a local bidder preference.nor were any requirements set forth indicating that proposers should tailor their bids toward a focus on local project Moreover.even if the Bidders would have known that an unwritten bias in favor of experience with local projects existed,multiple members of the Evaluation Committee.including those who ranked Moffatt &Nichol above Cederberg noted specifically the breadth of Moffatt's local experience and their familiarity with local permitting.Moreover unlike Cederberg.all the projects submitted by Moffet &Nichol were focused exclusively on shoreline projects As such Moffet &Nichol's projects included 1 their proposal were both more narrowly tailored and locally focused specifically for the engineering services sought by the City There simply is no rational basis by which the City Manager could have arrived that Cederberg was better suited to be awarded the engineering services for the living shoreline portion of the RFO Even if the consideration of Cederberg s history in working with the City of Miami Beach was a factual basis by which the City could determine that one Bidder displayed a more robust record of know ledge.performance.and aptitude for the shoreline portion of the RFQ.to make the decision based on that criteria would be to rely on a series of factors not contemplated by the RF)guidelines.it deprives all bidders of a fan opportunity to compete by gmng an unwritten advantage based on a criteria which no bidders could have tailored their bids to reflect Because the City Manager relied on the local history and preference for a bidder with local experience as criteria in awarding this RF)and because there is no clearly defined standard for the evaluation of such,the Bidders in th RF)were prevented from competing on an even playing field and the decision to make an award recommendation is based on an arbitrary and capricious standard The RF)for the living shoreline portion of the RF should be reissued for Page 76 of 1993 5 competitive solicitation.with a clear indication of procedure in the event of a tie and a clear methodology of scoring for Bidders regarding experience with local shoreline projects B.Conclusion. The City of Miami Beach issued an RF)for engineering services for a living shoreline ,,-4-.~with a clearly identified RFQ approach and methodology The Evaluation Committee for this RF reviewed proposal submitted by Bidders based on a clearly defined criteria and standards The scoring provided bv the Evaluatuon Committee resulted in a tie for two bidders in this process.The Manager proceeded to break the tie by making a recommendation to award Cederberg based on their familiarity and experience in local shoreline projects The Evaluation Committee provided in their notes an emphasis on Moffett 's experience and familiarity with local shoreline projects as a rationale for their high scores.The City Manager clearly did not rely on the experience and familiarity with local shoreline projects as the criteria for breaking the tie. however even if she did,and to the extent she did.doing so would constitute a reliance on an undefined and unspecified criteria which should be deemed as arbitrary a and capricious based on Florida case law Because the City Manager s award recommendation is based on an arbitrary and capricious application of undefined criteria,the RF)recommendation should be denied and the Commission should either award Moffett &Nichol the living shoreline engineering services or rebid that portion of the RFO Respectfully submitted David J Moscoso DJM Page 77 0f 1993 ACTION:Resolution 2024-33164 adopted.Bradford Kaine and Kristy Bada to handle. C2 D A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER,OR DESIGNEE,TO SELECT, NEGOTIATE,AWARD,AND REJECT ALL BIDS,CONTRACTS,AGREEMENTS,AND GRANT APPLICATIONS;RENEW EXISTING CONTRACTS WHICH MAY EXPIRE;ANO TERMINATE EXISTING CONTRACTS,AS NEEDED,FROM THE LAST COMMISSION MEETING ON JULY 24,2024,UNTIL THE FIRST REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 11,2024,SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION BY THE CITY COMMISSION AT ITS FIRST REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 11,2024.JOINT CITY COMMISSION,RDA,AND NBCRA Applicable Area·Citywide Procurement ACTION:Resolution 2024-33165 adopted.Kristy Bada to handle. C2 E A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER PURSUANT TO INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE NO.2024-289-ND,FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR PHASE I WITH RHYTHM ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE TOP- RANKED PROPOSER:FURTHER.IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH RHYTHM ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH 360 NETWORK SOLUTIONS,LLC,AS THE SECOND-RANKED PROPOSER;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH 360 NETWORK SOLUTIONS,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GRIDMATRIX INC,AS THE THIRD-RANKED PROPOSER;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR PHASE I UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION.(TRANSPORTATION) Applicable Area:Citywide Procurement Mayor Steven Meiner Commissioner David Suarez Vice-Mayor Laura Dominguez ACTION:Resolution 2024-33166 adopted.Jose Gonzalez and Kristy Bada to handle. C2 F A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO 2024-234-ND.FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULT ANT FOR SEAWALLS,FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG, INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER.IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED Page 5 of 126Page78of1993 CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSUL TANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES; FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSUL TANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION.(PUBLIC WORKS) Applicable Area:Citywide Procurement 7.06:22 p.m. ACTION:The Item was referred to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee, The Item was separated from the Consent Agenda by Commissioner Fernandez. Commissioner Fernandez motioned to refer the ltem to the Finance Committee,seconded by Mayor Meiner.Vote:7-0.Jason Greene is to place on the Committee Agenda pending list.Kristy Sada to handle. Commissioner Fernandez stated that he separated this Item for further discussion but would like to refer this Item to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee Commissioner Fernandez motioned to refer the Item to the Finance Committee,seconded by Mayor Meiner Vote:7-0. Handouts or Reference Materials 1 Letter from David J.Moscoso,dated July 19,2024,Addressed to Interim City Manager Rickelle Williams,RE.Bid Protest letter to the City of Miami Bech (the "City")on behalf of Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.(the Client or "Moffat),pursuant to Section 2-371(2)OF THE City of Miami Beach Code.Providing the City with notice of deviations from the competitive solicitation guidelines and violations of established case law precedent in Florida 2 Letter from City Attorney Ricardo J.Dopico,dated July 23,2024,Addressed to David J. Moscoso.Esq..RE Response to Bid Protest Relating to Request for Qualifications No 2024-234-ND.Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines (the "RFQ")on behalf of Moffat &Nichols,Inc.(the "Client or "Moffatt'),pursuant to Section 2-371(2)of the City of Miami Beach Code C2 G REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ROUTINE RENEWAL OPTIONS,TASK ORDERS CHANGE ORDERS,OR CONTRACT AMENDMENTS FOR CITY-AWARDED CONTRACTS Applicable Area:Citywide Procurement ACTION:The request was approved.Kristy Sada to handle. Page 6 of 126Page79of1993 NEW BUSINESS 18 MIAMI BEACH COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM TO Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee Members FROM.Enc Carpenter.City Manager DATE September 20.2024 TITLE DISCUSS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO 2024-234-ND,FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES;AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSUL TANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC ..AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS,FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC ..AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG.INC ,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES:FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL. INC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION (PUBLIC WORKS) RECOMMENDATION At the July 24,2024 Commission meeting Commissioner Fernandez separated item C2 F (Attachment A)from the Consent Agenda and referred it to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee for further discussion (Attachment B) This solicitation is currently under the cone of silence Page 80 0t 1993 BACKGROUND/HISTORY Please see the attached July 24,2024 Commission meeting memorandum ANALYSIS Please see the attached July 24,2024 Commission meeting memorandum FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT Please see the attached July 24,2024 Commission meeting memorandum Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate? (FOR ORDINANCES ONLY) The Business Impact Estimate (BIE)was published on. See BIE at:https_//wwywmuamibeachfl_gov/city _hall/city clerk/meeting-notices/ FINANCIAL INFORMATION Please see the attached July 24 2024 Commission meeting memorandum CONCLUSION Please see the attached July 24,2024 Commission meeting memorandum Applicable Area Citywide Is_this_a"Residents Right to Knowy"item, pursuant to City Code Section 2-17? No Is this item related to a G.O.Bond Project? No yas_this Agenda_Item_initially_requestedbya_lobbyistwyhch,as_defined_in_Code_Sec_2.481, includes a principal engaged in lobbying?No If so,specify the name of lobbyist(s)and principal(s) Department Procurement Sponsor(s) Co-sponsor(s] Page 81 0f 1993 Condensed Title Award RFO 2024-234-ND,Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines PW/PR Page 82 0f 19923 OLD BUSINESS 5 MIAMI BEACH COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM TO FROM DATE TITLE Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee Members Eric Carpenter,Executive Director October 18.2024 DISCUSS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH.FLORIDA,ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO 2024-234-ND.FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES:AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME LEAD CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS,FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG.INC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULT ANT FOR SEAWALLS,FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS:AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG.INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSUL TANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL INC AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES,AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT(S)UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION (PUBLIC WORKS) RECOMMENDATION The City Administration ("Administration")recommends that the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee (FERC"or Committee )approve the City Manager's recommendation from the July 24 2024 Commission meeting,pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234-ND tor engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering.LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with BCC Engineering.LLC,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg Inc as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls further if the Administration is not successful in negotiating Page 85 0f 1993 an agreement with Cummins Cederberg.Inc authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Serces Inc..as the proposer determined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls,and further authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg.Inc,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines,further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg.Inc,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for living shorelines:further,if the Administration is not successful mn negotiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol.Inc..authorizing the Administration to enter into negotations with GHD Serices Inc.as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines The item also authorized the City Manager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. This solicitation s currently under the cone of silence BACKGROUND/HISTORY At the July 24.2024.City Commission meeting.Commissioner Alex Fernandez separated item C2 F (Attachment A)from the Consent Agenda and referred it to FERC for further discussion (Attachment B).At the September 20,2024,FERC meeting.Commissioner Fernandez motioned to defer the item to the October 18,2024,meeting.requesting the Administration's final recommendation Commissioner Magazine seconded the motion,and t was unanimously approved (Attachment C) ANALYSIS At the July 24.2024.Commission meeting.the City Manager presented to the City Commission in item C2 F a recommendation pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ)2024-234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines,which requested to authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering.LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls,further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement wath BCC Engineering.LLC authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg.Inc,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls,further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg.Inc authonzing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Serices Inc,as the proposer determined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls.and further authonzing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg.Inc,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines. further,if the Administration is not successful mn negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg Inc,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol, Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for living shorelines further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol, Inc.authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for lung shorelines (Attachment A) During the FERC Committee meeting.Commissioner Fernandez introduced the tem and mentioned that two (2)consultants were tied as the top-ranked Bidders mn the living shoreline category Additionally.it was stated that Moffatt &Nichol,Inc was top-ranked by three (3)of the five (5)Evaluation Committee members,and Cummins Cederberg.Inc was top-ranked by two (2)of the five (S5)Evaluation Committee members t is important to note that the final ranking of the Evaluation Committee members consisted of Page 86 0f 1993 qualitative and quantitative critena The qualitative criteria points assigned by the committee members were based on the experience and qualifications of the proposed firm and team,as well as its approach and methodology The quantitative criteria points were assigned by the Procurement Department for Veterans Preference and the Consultant's volume of work awarded by the City in the last three (3)years The points assigned by the evaluation committee members for the qualitative criteria are as follows. RFQ 2024-234-ND Eugene Matthew Mariela Lindsey AdalbertoEngineeringServicesforPaez Living Shorelines Egemba lePera Castillo Precht Viciedo Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative Cummins Cederberg. Inc 89 94 99 90 93 Moffatt &Nichol,Inc 90 88 92 90 95 GHD Services Inc 85 89 95 82 92 AECOM Technical Serices,Inc 91 84 74 74 90 The points assigned by the Procurement Department for the quantitative cntena are as follows RFQ 2024-234-ND Eugene Matthew Mariela Paez Lindsey AdalbertoEngineeringServicesEgembaLePeraCastilloPrechtViciedoforLjyingShorelines Quantitative Quantitative Quantitative Quantitative Quantitative Cummins Cederberg.Inc 3 3 3 3 3 Moffatt &Nichol,Inc 5 5 5 5 5 GHD Services Inc 5 5 5 5 5 AECOM Technical Services,Inc 0 0 0 0 0 The final ranking of the combination of the qualitative and quantitative criteria points are as follows RFQ 2024-234-ND Low 0 Engineering Services for trying c Aggregate GShorelinesCTotals0r Cummins Cederberg.Inc 9 4 Moffatt&Nichol,Inc 9 1 GHD Ser«ces Inc 13 3 AECOM Technical Services,Inc 19 4 Pursuant Section 2-369 of the City of Miami Beach City Code '[]n determining the best bidder [the City Manager shall consider]the following (1)the ability,capacity and skill of the Bidder to perform the contract (2)whether the Bidder can perform the contract within the time specified without delay or Interference Page 87 of 1993 (3)the character,integnty.reputation judgment.expenence and efficiency of the Bidder (4)the quality of performance of previous contracts,and (5)the previous and existing compliance by the Bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract Thus,after considering the above,reviewing the submissions,the Evaluation Committee s scoring and rankings,and commentary,and the City's experience with the tied firms,the City Manager recommended to the City Commission for the City to negotiate with BCC Engineering as the best- qualified firm to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawall projects and Cummins Cederberg as the best-qualified firm to serve as the prime/lead consultant for ling shoreline projects As requested by the Committee,the Administration has reviewed the recommendation and confirmed that it is accurate and will remain unchanged This conclusion was reached after a thorough reassessment of the evaluation criteria,scoring process,and the City's prior experience with the firms The Administration reaffirms that BCC Engineering.LLC s the most qualified to lead seawall projects.and Cummins Cederberg.Inc is the most qualified to lead living shoreline projects This review considered all factors,including the tied rankings and the qualitative and quantitative evaluation criteria Therefore.the Administration stands by its initial recommendation to proceed with negotiations as outlined in item C2 F (Attachment A ) FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT The Public Works Department has budgeted $1,000,000 for these services Fees will be established through the negotiation process Services pursuant to the award of this RFQ shall be subject to successful negotiations and the availability of funds approved through the City's budgeting process Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate?No (FOR ORDINANCES ONLY) The Business Impact Estimate (BIE)was published on . See BIE at:htts//ywwmamibeachtl_goy/city_-hallycity_clerk_meeting-noticesy FINANCIAL INFORMATION 433-0815-061357-29-418-564-00-00-00-29020 CONCLUSION $1 000.000 It rs recommended that the FER,approve the City Manager s recommendation from the July 24, 2024 Commission meeting.pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFO)2024-234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines.authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with BCC Engineering.LLC,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for seawalls;further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement wth BCC Engineering LLC authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations wth Cummins Cederberg.Inc as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for seawalls further,if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg.Inc ,authonzing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Seruces Inc as the proposer determined to be the third best qualified consultant for seawalls,and further authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with Cummins Cederberg.Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the best qualified to serve as the prime/lead consultant for living shorelines,further,if the Administration is not successful mn negotiating an agreement with Cummins Cederberg Inc authonzing the Administration to enter Page 88 of 1993 into negotiations with Moffatt &Nichol.Inc.,as the proposer determined to be the second best qualified consultant for Irving shorelines,further if the Administration is not successful in negotiating an agreement with Moffatt &Nichol,Inc.,authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with GHD Services Inc.,as the proposer to be the third best qualified consultant for living shorelines The item also authorized the City Manager and City Clerk to execute agreement(s)upon the conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration Applicable Area Citywide lsthis_a"Residents Right_to Know item pursuant to City Code Section 2-172 No Is this item related to a G.O.Bond Project? No Was_this_Agenda_ltem_initially_requested by a lobbyist which,_as defined_in_Code Sec._2481 includes a principal engaged in lobbying?No If so,specify the name of lobbyists)and principal(s) Department Procurement Sponsor[S] Commissioner Alex Fernandez Co-sponsor(s] Condensed Title Discuss a Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach,Florida, accepting the recommendation of the City Manager to authorize negotiations relating to Request for Qualifications No 2024-234-ND for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines Page 89 of 1993 ESTIMATE FOR TRAPPING,AND SPAYING OR NEUTERING ALL COMMUNITY CATS WITHIN MIAMI BEACH OVER A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS,WITH THE PLAN TO BE PRESENTED TO THE FINANCE AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCY COMMITTEE ("FERC")AT ITS JULY 26,2024 MEETING Applicable Area:Citywide Public Works Commissioner David Suarez May 15,2024-C7 AJ ACTION: Item was not heard and will be heard at the November 8.2024 FERC meeting OB 4 DISCUSS NEXT STEPS AND FUNDING FOR THE PINE TREE DRIVE AND 46 STREET TRAFFIC CIRCLE PROJECT. Applicable Area:Middle Beach Capital Improvement Projects Capital Improvement Projects June 26.2024-C4 AF ACTION: Item was not heard and will be heard at the November 8.2024 FERC meeting. OB 5.DISCUSS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA.ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024 234-ND,FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH BCC ENGINEERING,LLC,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG.INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS;FURTHER IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR SEAWALLS:AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG. INC,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE BEST QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS THE PRIME/LEAD CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES,FURTHER,IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH CUMMINS CEDERBERG,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL INC.,AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE SECOND BEST QUALIFIED CONSUL TANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES;FURTHER.IF THE ADMINISTRATION IS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN NEGOTIATING AN AGREEMENT WITH MOFFATT &NICHOL,INC.,AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH GHD SERVICES INC AS THE PROPOSER DETERMINED TO BE THE THIRD BEST QUALIFIED CONSULTANT FOR LIVING SHORELINES,AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT{S) UPON THE CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS BY THE ADMINISTRATION. (PUBLIC WORKS) Applicable Area Citywide Procurement Page 2 of 10 Page 90 0f 1993 Vice-Mayor Fernandez July 24,2024-C2 F ACTION: Item lo be heard at Commission with a favorable recommendation to accept the City Manager's recommendation relating to requests for qualifications NO 2024-234-N for engineering services for seawalls and living shorelines NEW BUSINESS NB1 DISCUSS THE DESIRE ABILITY.FEASABILITY,AND COST OF CONSTUCTING A CHILDREN'S PARK AT THE EUCLID CIRCLE ON LINCOLN ROAD. Applicable Area.South Beach Facilities and Fleet Management Commissioner David Suarez June 26.2024-C4 M ACTION. ltem deferred to the November 8 2024 FERC meeting NB2 EXPLORE CREATION OF AN EMPTY SPACE RE-UTILIZATION INITIATIVE TO SET UP AS PHOTO SHOOT STUDIOS FOR ASPIRING ARTISTS/PHOTOGRAPHERS (ON CITY-OWNED PROPERTY) Applicable Area:South Beach Facilities and Fleet Management Commissioner Joseph Magazine June 26,2024-C4 K ACTION: Item was not heard and will be heard at the November 8.2024 FERC meeting. NB 3 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,DIRECTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO EXPLORE FEASIBLE STRATEGIES FOR CREATING AND EXPANDING "GREEN ROOFS",AS WELL AS INCORPORATING GREENERY ANO LANDSCAPING ON CITY BUILDINGS,AND PRESENT ITS FINDINGS TO THE LAND USE AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE AND THE FINANCE AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCY COMMITTEE WITHIN 90 DAYS OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS RESOLUTION. Applicable Area Citywide Facilities and Fleet Management Commissioner Joseph Magazine Commissioner David Suarez Commissioner Tanya Bhatt May 15,2024-C7 BH ACTION: ltem was not heard and will be heard at the November 8.2024 FER meeting NB 4 DISCUSS ESTABLISHING A MATCH FUNDING PROGRAM TO INCENTIVZE BUILDING OWNER PARTICIPATION IN THE HULANICKI ART DECO PASTEL COLORS INITIATIVE Applicable Area Citywide Economic Development Page 3 of 10 Page 91 0f 1993 ATTACHMENT B ADDENDUM AND RFQ SOLICITATION MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,34 Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES May 13,2024 This Addendum to the above-referenced RFQ is issued in response to questions from prospective proposers,or other clarifications and revisions issued by the City.The RFQ is amended in the following particulars only (deletions are shown by strikethrough and additions are underlined). I.REVISION:RFQ DUE DATE AND TIME.The deadline for the electronic receipt of bids through Periscope S2G is extended until 3:00 pm,on Tuesday,May 28,2024. All bids received and time stamped through Periscope S2G prior to the bid submittal deadline shall be accepted as timely submitted.Bids cannot be submitted after the deadline established for receipt of proposals.Hard copy bids or bids received electronically,either through email or facsimile,submitted prior to or after the deadline for receipt of bids are not acceptable and will be rejected.Late bids cannot be submitted,bidders are cautioned to plan sufficiently.The City will in no way be responsible for delays caused by technical difficulty or caused by any other occurrence. II.REVISION.DELETE Section 0300,Proposal Submittal Instructions and Format,Subsection 4.Electronic Proposal Format,Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications of the Firm and Team in its entirety and REPLACE with Exhibit B:Revised Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications of the Firm and Team. Ill.ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A:Pre-Proposal Sign-in Sheet. Exhibit B:Revised Tab 2 Experience &Qualifications of the Firm and Team. IV.RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED: Q1:In Appendix B of the RFQ,In Section 9.1 of the Sample Agreement,would the City consider adding "upon payment to Consultant pursuant to the payment terms of this Agreement",to the end of the provision? A1:Refer to Section 0200 General Conditions,Solicitations Terms &Conditions -Goods and Services,Subsection 13 Exceptions to Solicitation.However,the purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City)firm for the project.Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope or cost.Rather,as required per the RFQ,proposers are to submit their qualifications and approach as indicated in Section 0300.After selection,the City and the selected firm will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. 1 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3+Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov 02:As written in Appendix B of the RFQ,the second paragraph in Section 12.1 of the Sample Agreement is not in compliance with F.S.725.08.Would the City please delete the second paragraph of Section 12.12 A2:Refer to Section 0200 General Conditions,Solicitations Terms &Conditions -Goods and Services,Subsection 13 Exceptions to Solicitation.However,the purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City)firm for the project.Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope or cost.Rather,as required per the RFQ,proposers are to submit their qualifications and approach as indicated in Section 0300.After selection,the City and the selected firm will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q3:Under tab 2.1 it says that seawalls or living shorelines need to be at least 400 continuous linear feet.Could we present projects featuring shorelines of less than 400 LF,or are they required to have a continuous length of at least 400 LF? A3:Please refer to Section II.Revision. Q4:If we are submitting 2 different proposals,please can you clarify the instructions on how we will need to submit the proposals.Do we attach them as 2 separate PDF files or should they be in the same document? Or do we submit twice? A4:Attach 2 separate PDF files. Q5:Section 2.1 and 2.2.1 are asking for the same information.Should we list the requested experience twice or is that an error? AS:The experience that is to be submitted for Tab 2,Section 2.1 is that of the proposing firm. The experience that is to be submitted for Tab 2,Section 2.2.1 is that of the proposing firm's team (personnel and subconsultants).If the experience is overlapping,please submit it under both sections. Q6:Under tab 2.1 it says to submit at least 3 projects performed within the last 10 years.Is there a limit as to how many projects we can include? A6:No. Q7:Under tab 2.2.1 it says to submit at least 2 projects performed with the last 10 years.Is there a limit as to how many projects we can include? A7:No. QB:Which tab should we include license/certifications? AS:Bidder (defined as the Firm)does not need to submit copies of licenses/certifications for the Bidder.However,licenses/certifications of the prime Bidder's personnel and subconsultants shall be included in Tab 2,Section 2.2. 2 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQ UEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SER VICES FOR SEAW ALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,34 Flor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www .miamibeachfl.gov Q9:To adequately address the City's answers to bidder questions,particularly to allow time to respond to the question regarding the number of packages required to be submitted,we respectfully request the due date be extended by a minimum of two weeks. A9:Please refer to Section I.Revision. Q10:Can the City please confirm bidders do not need to provide copies of professional licenses in their proposals per item 6 on page 14? A10:See response to QB above. Q11:Can the City please confirm that bidders are not required to submit proposals for both the seawalls and living shorelines contracts but can submit a proposal for one service (for example,living shorelines only)and still be considered for selection?Can the City please confirm that if only one package is submitted,the firm will not be precluded from consideration? A 11:Bidders may submit proposals for seawalls,living shorelines,or both.Bidders are not required to submit proposals for both categories of work. Q12:As currently worded,we believe that the indemnity provisions within Section 17 (PDF page 6 of the RFQ), Article 12 (PDF page 39 of RFQ),and section T of Exhibit A (PDF page 77 of RFQ)are not in compliance with FL Statute 725.08 and are unenforceable;in addition,the City is requiring indemnification of entities that are not being contracted with.Would the City reword these sections to conform with the statute?Suggested language per FL Statutes 725.08:"The design professional shall indemnify and hold harmless the City,and its officers and employees,from liabilities,damages,losses,and costs,including,but not limited to,reasonable attorneys'fees,to the extent caused by the negligence,recklessness,or intentionally wrongful conduct of the design professional and other persons employed or utilized by the design professional in the performance of the contract." A12:Refer to Section 0200 General Conditions,Solicitations Terms &Conditions -Goods and Services,Subsection 13 Exceptions to Solicitation.However,the purpose of this RFQ is to select the best qualified (as determined by the City)firm for the project.Responses pursuant to the RFQ are not to include scope or cost.Rather,as required per the RFQ,proposers are to submit their qualifications and approach as indicated in Section 0300.After selection,the City and the selected firm will negotiate scope,terms,and cost. Q13:Should project experience be listed in section 2.1 or 2.2.1 within the proposal?The request is duplicated in these two sections within the RFQ. A13:See response to Q5 above. Any questions regarding this Addendum should be submitted in writing to the Procurement Department to the attention of the individual named below,with a copy to the City Clerk's Office at RafaelGranado@miamibeachfl.gov MIAMI BEACH Contact: Natalia Del ado Telephone: 305-673-7000 ext.26263 miamibeachfi.ov 3 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES MIAMI BEACH PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,36 Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Proposers are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this addendum as part of your RFQ submission. Sincerely, Kristy l.im Chief Procurement Officer 4 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES MIAMI BEACH EXHIBIT A PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,34 Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov Pre-Proposal Sign-In Sheet 5 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES NIA/NAIBEACH CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PRE-BID MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET DATE:Wednesday,April 17,2024 TIME:3:00PM BID NO.AND TITLE:RFQ 2024-234-ND,ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES NAME TITLE COMPANY Email PHONE NATALIA DELGADO CONTRACTING OFFICER CMB NATALIADELGADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV 305-673-7000 X26263 GIANCARLO PENA ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER CMB GiancarloPena@miamibeachfl.gov 305-673-7000 X26343 Kaimrajh,Teresa PLANNING AND DESIGN MANAGER CMB Teresa Kai mraih@mia mi beach fl.gov 305-673-7000 X26193 Enrique M Zuniga 305 CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC ezuniga@305consult.com (786)409-5548,Ext 102 SALLY PEREZ PURSUIT MANAGER BCC ENGINEERING sallyperez@bcceng.com 305.670.2350 Christian Aquino BCC ENGINEERING caquino@bcceng.com Bob Forand BCC ENGINEERING bforand@bcceng.com Kyle Bechtelheimer CLIENT SERVICES MANAGER CPH kbechtelheimer@cphcorp.com 305.274.4805 (Ext.3610) Cherie Fromson MARKETING COORDINATOR CUMMINS CEDERBERG cfromson@Cummins@Cederberg.com 1 561-767-4946 DIRECTOR,SUSTAINABILITY AND Carmen Olazabal RESILIENCE EXP carmen.olazabal@exp.com 1.786.774.5388 JESSE DAVIS GHD Jesse.Davis@ghd.com MELISSA BURNS GHD Melissa.Burns@ghd.com JULIANNA CAMPBELL SENIOR PROPOSAL MANAGER GHD Julianna.Campbell@ghd.com 1317 291 6643 JOSE MORALES GHD Jose.Morales@ghd.com Morteza Khatib PRINCIPAL GREEN COAST ENGINEERS morteza@greencoastengineers.com 305-213-5951 CARA PASQUALE DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MILLER LEGG cpasquale@millerlegg.com,(9541 628 3609 Tim Blankenship MOFFATT &NICHOL tbla n kenship@moffattnichol .com Amanda Caparro MOFFATT &NICHOL acaparro@moffattnichol.com Vanessa Benzecry MOFFATT &NICHOL vbenzecry@moffattnichol.com Lynne Boucher PROPOSAL MANAGER MOFFATT &NICHOL lboucher@moffattnichol.com 757.217.0887 Kimberly Schmidt SENIOR MARKETING MANAGER NOVA CONSULTING kschmidt@nova-consulting.com 305.436.9200 COLIN HENDERSON NOVA CONSULTING chenderson@noya-consulting.com Erin A.Hague NATIONAL PRACTICE LEAD TETRA TECH erin.hague@tetratech.com 1 (561)536-0011 Justin Almojuela BUILDINGS MARKETING COORDINATOR WGI Justin.Almojuela@wginc.com 407.581.1221 JEFFREY BERGMANN WGI Jeffrey.Bergmann@wginc.com BRITNEY COOPER WGI Britney.Cooper@wginc.com Amanda Montgomery WGI Amanda.Montgomery@wginc.com Kristen Nowicki WGI Kristen.Nowicki@wginc.com Francis Nunez JUNIOR MARINE ENGINEER Bermello Ajamil &Partners francis._nunez@woolpert.com +1 212.334.2050 Lori Cox HBC LCOx@HBCEngineeringCo.com Miguel Villegas HBC MVillegas@HBCEngineeri ngCo.com CARL REYES KIMLEY HORN Carl.Reyes@kimley-horn.com Kierra Bryant SRS ENGINEERING Kierra@srs-corp.com TYLER HACKETT DEWBERRY thackett@Dewberry.com Derry Behar R.J.BEHAR dbehar@rjbehar.com JESSICA PEREZ STANTEC jessica.perez@stantec.com LESLIE ALVAREZ STANTEC leslie.alvarez@stantec.com MIAMI BEACH EXHIBIT B PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3d Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www .miamibeachfl.gov Revised Tab 2 Experience and Qualifications of the Firm and Team 6 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES MIAMI BEACH Ex erience &Qualifications of the Firm and Team PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,34 Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm.Submit detailed information regarding the relevant experience and proven track record of the firm or its principals in providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies.Submit at least three (3) projects performed within the last ten (10)years as evidence of the requested experience. Bidders shall include prior experience which exemplifies experience with the following. a.Seawalls or Living Shorelines.Experience must include assessment,design,permitting,bidding services,and construction services. b.Public Outreach. c.Projects involving state and federal grant funds. d.Projects involving challenging environmental conditions or unique design requirements. e.Innovative solutions or approaches to enhance a project's sustainability or efficiency. f.Use {design,permitting,and implementation)of cutting-edge technology g.Local {defined as Miami Dade County)environmental conditions,regulatory constraints,and community expectations. 2.2 Qualifications of Bidder Team.Provide an organizational chart of all the prime Bidder's personnel and subconsultants,if applicable,each team members'qualifications and the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein.A resume of each individual,including education,licensure,relevant experience,and any other pertinent information,shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.2.1 Project Experience.Submit detailed information regarding the relevant experience and proven track record of each team member in providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies.Submit at least three (3)projects performed within the last ten (10)years as evidence of the requested experience. Bidders shall include prior experience which exemplifies experience with the following. a.Seawalls or Living Shorelines.Experience must include assessment,design,permitting,bidding services,and construction services. b.Public Outreach. c.Projects involving state and federal grant funds. d.Projects involving challenging environmental conditions or unique design requirements. e.Innovative solutions or approaches to enhance a project's sustainability or efficiency. f.Use {design,permitting,and implementation)of cutting-edge technology g.Local (defined as Miami Dade County)environmental conditions,regulatory constraints,and community expectations. 2.3 Evidence of Prior Working Experience:If sub-consultant(s)/sub-contractor(s)are included in the proposal, submit evidence that the proposed team has successfully collaborated on prior projects.For each project,submit the roiect descri tion,a enc name,a enc contract,contact tele hone &email,ears ,and term of en a ement. 7 ADDENDUM NO.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO.2024-234-ND FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR SEAWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES MIAMI BEACH Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2024-234-N D Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines TABLE OF CONTENTS SOLICITATION SECTIONS: 0100 INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS 0200 GENERAL CONDITIONS 0300 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS &FORMAT 0400 PROPOSAL EVALUATION APPENDICES: APPENDIX A SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPENDIX B SAMPLE CONTRACT APPENDIX C INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX D SEAWALL AND SHORELINE PRIORITIZATION LIST APPENDIX E CITYWIDE PROCEDURE NO.16.06 PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRA NTS AND PROJECTS APPENDIX F 2CFR APPENDIX II TO PART 200 SECTION 0100 MIAMI BEACH INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS &GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.GENERAL.This Request for Qualifications (RFQ)is issued by the City of Miami Beach,Florida (the "City"),as the means for prospective Bidders to submit proposals for the City's consideration in evaluating qualifications to select a firm with whom it may negotiate an agreement for the purpose noted herein. The City utilizes Periscope S2G (formerly known as BidSync)(www.periscopeholdinqs.com or www.bidsync.com)for automatic notification of competitive solicitation opportunities and document fulfillment,including the issuance of any addendum to this RFQ.Any prospective Bidder who has received this RFQ by any means other than through Periscope S2G must register immediately with Periscope S2G to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ.Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal submitted. 2.BACKGROUND. The City of Miami Beach is investing in infrastructure improvements to reduce flood risk and adapt to climate change.As part of its resilience efforts,the City has updated multiple land use codes for new construction to address stormwater retention and setbacks and to increase base flood elevation and freeboard requirements.Most recently, the City adopted an ordinance entitled "Resiliency Standards for Tidal and Flood Protection",requiring all new seawalls to have a minimum elevation of 5.7 ft.North American Vertical Datum (NAVO). The City of Miami Beach has approximately 55 miles of seawalls of which approximately 50 miles are privately owned,and 5 miles are City-owned. To optimize the benefits of the seawall program,the Public Works Department developed a methodology to prioritize the reconstruction of approximately 2.8 miles of City-owned seawalls within the next 10 years.Factors such as elevation,location,and condition of each seawall were used to develop the initial ranking of each seawall. The initial rankings were then adjusted to capture the benefits derived from contiguous private seawall segments. Essentially,by optimizing the elevation of public seawalls adjacent to extended private seawall segments,the City can mitigate additional flooding and encourage residents to reconstruct their seawalls.Thus,the ultimate focus of the seawall prioritization was to establish a continuous storm surge and overland flooding barrier throughout the City. The seawall prioritization was approved and adopted in 2021 (See Appendix D),and since then,the City has been working on executing the design and construction of prioritized segments. In 2021,the City also identified the most viable locations for implementing a living shoreline within existing City- owned shoreline segments (See Appendix D).A "Living Shoreline"is a technique that uses a suite of bank stabilization and habitat restoration techniques to reinforce the shoreline,minimize coastal erosion,and maintain coastal processes while protecting,restoring,enhancing,and creating natural habitat for fish and aquatic plants and wildlife.Living shoreline projects may utilize a variety of structural and organic materials,such as wetland plants, submerged aquatic vegetation,oyster reefs,sand fill,and stone.The use of innovative hybrid seawall systems is also currently being evaluated by the City. The City is interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience to continue to carry out the planned improvements to the prioritized seawall segments.These planned improvements include a combination of conventional seawalls,hybrid seawalls,and living shorelines.The intent is to maximize sustainable and resilient solutions for our City. 3.PURPOSE. The purpose of this RFQ is to select a prime consultant(s)for seawalls and living shorelines.Bidders may submit a proposal for seawalls or living shorelines,or both.A firm interested in being considered for seawalls and living shorelines must submit two separate proposals -one proposal for seawalls and a separate proposal for shorelines. MIAMI BEACH The City may make an award to a qualified consultant(s)that can act in the capacity of the City's prime consultant(s) for both seawall and living shoreline projects to perform the scope of work outlined below or any required services to facilitate the seawall and living shoreline program.The City may also award seawalls to one consultant(s)and living shorelines to another consultant(s). The selected consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City through the decision- making process of making its seawall and living shoreline systems resilient,environmentally responsible, dependable,and future-proof while ensuring any requirements stemming from state and/or federal grant funding are met.While the City intends to make an award to a single consultant for conventional seawalls and living shorelines,it reserves its right to award to multiple consultants if it deems it is in its best interest.Additionally,the City reserves the right to engage other consultants,through other means,to assist the City in its city's infrastructure improvement endeavors. Consultant(s)shall be selected in accordance with the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act for related projects as defined in Section 287.055(2)/(0)(2),Florida Statutes (i.e.,a grouping of substantially similar construction, rehabilitation,or renovation activities).As the selection shall be specific to the work detailed herein,the value of the work awarded shall not be limited to the limits established pursuant to Section 287.055(2)(9),Florida Statutes. 3.1 Interested Parties.The_City desires to receive proposals from qualified firms that can provide professional services,in accordance with Section 287.055,Florida Statutes,commonly referred to as the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA).Interested parties are invited to submit proposals in accordance with Section 0300.A pre-proposal conference will be held in accordance with Section 0100, Sub-sections 5 and 7.All proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria found in Section 0400. Proposals will be evaluated against other "like"proposals.For example,proposals submitted for seawalls will be evaluated against other proposals for seawalls,and proposals submitted for shorelines will be evaluated against other proposals for shorelines.The option to award one or multiple prime consultants by option or for both options shall be at the City Commission's sole discretion. THIS RFQ,AND ANY RES UL TING CONTRACT,IS ISSUED AND GOVERNED BY SECTION 287.055,FLORIDA STATUTES. 4.STATEMENT OF WORK REQUIRED. The consultant will provide subject matter expertise to the City on its seawall and living shoreline prioritization work. The consultant must have a team of qualified individuals who can guide the City through the decision-making process of making its seawall and living shoreline systems resilient,environmentally responsible,dependable,and future proof.The City is interested in partnering with the most innovative and solutions-oriented engineers in the field dedicated to resilience and Miami Beach Rising Above.The services described in subsequent items may be awarded in the future to the seawall and shoreline locations in the prioritization list,Appendix D.The City may add or remove seawalls or shorelines to the prioritization lists as deemed necessary upon approval of the City Manager. I.Assessment,Design,Permitting,Bidding Services,and Services during Construction for: II.Updating of the Seawall and living shorelines prioritization Plan. Ill.Site Investigation and Feasibility Studies. IV.Geotechnical,Coastal,and Environmental Engineering Services V.Risk Assessment and Mitigation VI.Project Documentation and Reporting VII.Maintenance and Rehabilitation MIAM I BEACH 5.ANTICIPATED RFQ TIMETABLE.The tentative schedule for this solicitation is as follows· RFQ Issued April 4,2024 Pre-Proposal Meeting April 17,2024@ 3:00 p.m.ET Join on your computer or mobile app Join the meeting now Or call in (audio only) +1 786-636-1480 United States,Miami Phone Conference ID:598 220 692# Deadline for Receipt of Questions May 3,2024 @ 5:00 p.m.ET Responses Due May 20,2024 @ 3:00 p.m.ET Join on your computer or mobile app Join the meeting now Or call in (audio only) +1 786-636-1480 United States,Miami Phone Conference ID:163 733 815# Evaluation Committee Review TBD Tentative Commission Approval TBD Contract Negotiations Following Commission Approval 6.PROCUREMENT CONTACT.Any questions or clarifications concerning this solicitation shall be submitted to the Procurement Contact noted below: The Proposal title/number shall be referenced on all correspondence.All questions or requests for clarification must be received no later than fifteen (15)calendar days prior to the date proposals are due as scheduled in Section 0100-5.All responses to questions/clarifications will be sent to all prospective Bidders in the form of an addendum. 7.PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING OR SITE VISIT(S}.A pre-proposal meeting or site visit(s)may be scheduled. Attendance for the pre-proposal meeting shall be via web conference and recommended as a source of information but is not mandatory.Bidders interested in participating in the Pre-Proposal Meeting must follow these steps: Join on your computer or mobile app Join the meeting now Or call in (audio only) +1 786-636-1480 United States,Miami Phone Conference ID:598 220 692# Bidders who are participating should send an e-mail to the contact person listed in this RFQ expressing their intent to participate. 8.PRE-PROPOSAL INTERPRETATIONS.Oral information or responses to questions received by prospective Bidders are not binding on the City and will be without legal effect,including any information received at pre- MIAMI BEACH submittal meeting or site visit(s).The City by means of Addenda will issue interpretations or written addenda clarifications considered necessary by the City in response to questions.Only questions answered by written addenda will be binding and may supersede terms noted in this solicitation.Addendum will be released through Periscope S2G.Any prospective Bidder who has received this RFQ by any means other than through Periscope S2G must register immediately with Periscope S2G to assure it receives any addendum issued to this RFQ.Failure to receive an addendum may result in disqualification of proposal.Written questions should be received no later than the date outlined in the Anticipated RFQ Timetable section. 9.CONE OF SILENCE.This RFQ is subject to,and all bidders are expected to be or become familiar with,the City's Cone of Silence Requirements,as codified in Section 2-486 of the City Code.Bidders shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all applicable provisions of the City's Cone of Silence are complied with,and shall be subject to any and all sanctions,as prescribed therein,including rendering their response voidable,in the event of such non- compliance.Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov 10.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION.After proposal submittal,the City reserves the right to require additional information from Bidders (or Bidder team members or sub-consultants)to determine:qualifications (including,but not limited to,litigation history,regulatory action,or additional references);and financial capability (including,but not limited to,annual reviewed/audited financial statements with the auditors notes for each of their last two complete fiscal years). 11.BIDDER'S RESPONSIBILITY.Before submitting a response,each Bidder shall be solely responsible for making any and all investigations,evaluations,and examinations,as it deems necessary,to ascertain all conditions and requirements affecting the full performance of the contract.Ignorance of such conditions and requirements,and/or failure to make such evaluations,investigations,and examinations,will not relieve the Bidder from any obligation to comply with every detail and with all provisions and requirements of the contract,and will not be accepted as a basis for any subsequent claim whatsoever for any monetary consideration on the part of the Bidder. 12.DETERMINATION OF AWARD.The City Manager may appoint an evaluation committee to assist in the evaluation of proposals received.The evaluation committee is advisory only to the city manager.The city manager may consider the information provided by the evaluation committee process and/or may utilize other information deemed relevant.The City Manager's recommendation need not be consistent with the information provided by the evaluation committee process and takes into consideration Miami Beach City Code Section 2-369,including the following considerations: (1)The ability,capacity and skill of the Bidder to perform the contract. (2)Whether the Bidder can perform the contract within the time specified,without delay or interference. (3)The character,integrity,reputation,judgment,experience and efficiency of the Bidder. (4)The quality of performance of previous contracts. (5)The previous and existing compliance by the Bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. The City Manager may recommend to the City Commission the Bidder(s)s/he deems to be in the best interest of the City or may recommend rejection of all proposals.The City Commission shall consider the City Manager's recommendation and may approve such recommendation.The City Commission may also,at its option,reject the City Manager's recommendation and select another Proposal or Proposals which it deems to be in the best interest of the City,or it may also reject all Proposals. 13.NEGOTIATIONS.Following selection,the City reserves the right to enter into further negotiations with the selected Bidder.Notwithstanding the preceding,the City is in no way obligated to enter into a contract with the selected Bidder in the event the parties are unable to negotiate a contract.It is also understood and acknowledged by Bidders that no property,contract or legal rights of any kind shall be created at any time until and unless an Agreement has been agreed to;approved by the City;and executed by the parties. M IAM I BEACH 14.E-VERIFY.As a contractor you are obligated to comply with the provisions of Section 448.095,Fla.Stat., "Employment Eligibility."Therefore,you shall utilize the U.S.Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Contractor during the term of the Contract and shall expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the Contract to likewise utilize the U.S.Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the Contract term. 15.PERISCOPE S2G (FORMERLY BIDSYNC).The Procurement Department utilizes Periscope S2G,Supplier-to- Government electronic bidding (e-Bid)platform.If you would like to be notified of available competitive solicitations released by the City you must register and complete your vendor qualifications through Periscope S2G,Supplier-to- Government www.bidsync.com/Miami-Beach.Registration is easy and will only take a few minutes.For detailed instructions on how to register,complete vendor qualifications and submit electronic bids visit https://www.miamibeachft.gov/city-hall/procurement/for-approval-how-to-become-a-vendor/. Should you have any questions regarding this system or registration,please visit the above link or contact Periscope S2G,Supplier-to-Government at support@bidsync.com or 800.990.9339,option 1,option 1. 16.HOW TO MANAGE OR CREATE A VENDOR PROFILE ON VENDOR SELF SERVICE (VSS).In addition to registering with Periscope S2G,the City encourages vendors to register with our online Vendor Self-Service web page,allowing City vendors to easily update contacts,attachments (W-9),and commodity information.The Vendor Self-Service (VSS)webpage (https://selfservice.miamibeachft.qov/vssNendors/default.aspx)will also provide you with purchase orders and payment information. Should you have any questions and/or comments,do not hesitate to submit them to vendorsupport@miamibeachft.gov . 17.SUPPLIER DIVERSITY.The City has established a registry of LGBT-owned businesses,as certified by the National LGBT Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC)and small and disadvantaged businesses,as certified by Miami- Dade County.See authorizing resolutions here. If your company is certified as an LGBT-owned business by NGLCC,or as a small or disadvantaged business by Miami-Dade County,click on the link below to be added to the City's supplier registry (Vendor Self-Service)and bid system (Periscope S2G,Supplier-to-Government).These are two different systems and it is important that you register for both. Click to see acceptable certification and to register:https://www.miamibeachft.gov/city-hall/procurement/how-to- become-a-vendor/. 17.INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees that it will indemnify and hold the Federal Government,its employees and/or their contractors,the State of Florida,its employees and/or their contractors,the County,its employees and/or their contractors,and the Municipality and its employees and/or their contractors harmless from liability to third parties for claims asserted under such contract for any work performed. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank SECTION 0200 M IA M I BEACH GENERA L CONDITIONS FORMAL SOLICITATIONS TERMS &CONDITIONS -GOODS AND SERVICES.By virtue of submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation,Bidder agrees to be bound by and in compliance with the Terms and Conditions for Services (dated 10.27.22),incorporated herein,which may be found at the following link: https://yy.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/procurement/standard-terms-and-conditions/ SOLICITATION TERMS &CONDITIONS -GRANTS AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.By virtue of submitting a bid in response to this 1TB,Bidder agrees to be bound by and in compliance with the Contract Provisions for Federal Awards (dated 8/20/20),incorporated herein,located at: https://yyy.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/procurement/standard-terms-and-conditions/ Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank SECTION 0300 MIAMI BEACH PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMAT 1.ELECTRONIC RESPONSES (ONLY).Proposals must be submitted electronically through Periscope 2G (formerly BidSync)on or before the date and time indicated.Hard copy proposals or proposals received through email or facsimile are not acceptable and will be rejected. A Bidder may submit a modified proposal to replace all or any portion of a previously submitted proposal until the deadline for proposal submittals.The City will only consider the latest version of the bid. Electronic proposal submissions may require the uploading of attachments.All documents should be attached as separate files in accordance with the instructions included in Section 4,below.Attachments containing embedded documents or proprietary file extensions are prohibited.It is the Bidder's responsibility to assure that its bid,including all attachments,is uploaded successfully. Only proposal submittals received,and time stamped by Periscope S2G (formerly BidSync)prior to the proposal submittal deadline shall be accepted as timely submitted.Late bids cannot be submitted and will not be accepted. Bidders are cautioned to allow sufficient time for the submittal of bids and uploading of attachments.Any technical issues must be submitted to Periscope S2G (formerly BidSync)by contacting (800)990-9339 (toll free)or S2G@periscopeholdings.com.The City cannot assist with technical issues regarding submittals and will in no way be responsible for delays caused by any technical or other issue. It is the sole responsibility of each Bidder to ensure its proposal is successfully submitted in Periscope S2G prior to the deadline for proposal submittals. 2.NON-RESPONSIVENESS.Failure to submit the following requirements shall result in a determination of non- responsiveness.Non-responsive proposals will not be considered. 1.Bid Submittal Questionnaire (submitted electronically). 3.OMITTED OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.Failure to complete and submit the Bid Submittal Questionnaire (submitted electronically)with the bid and by the deadline for submittals shall render a proposal non-responsive.With the exception of the Bid Submittal Questionnaire (completed and submitted electronically),the City reserves the right to seek any omitted information/documentation or any additional information from Bidder or other source(s),including but not limited to:any firm or principal information,applicable licensure,resumes of relevant individuals,client information,financial information,or any information the City deems necessary to evaluate the capacity of the Bidder to perform in accordance with contract requirements.Failure to submit any omitted or additional information in accordance with the City's request shall result in proposal being deemed non-responsive. 4.ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL FORMAT.In order to maintain comparability,facilitate the review process and assist the Evaluation Committee in review of proposals,it is strongly recommended that proposals be organized and tabbed in accordance with the tabs,and sections as specified below.The electronic submittal should be tabbed as enumerated below and contain a table of contents with page references.The electronic proposal shall be submitted through the "Line Items"attachment tab in Periscope S2G. TAB 1 Cover Letter &Table of Contents Cover Letter and Table of Contents.The table of contents should indicate the tabs,sections with tabs and page numbers to facilitate the evaluation committee's review.The cover letter must be signed by a principal or agent able to bid the firm and contain the following: (a)Prime Bidder.Include the name and location of the Prime Bidder,Primary Bidder's Representative for the RFQ,and Re resentatives Contact information. M IAM I BEACH (b)Select Seawalls or Shorelines.Bidder must indicate in the Bid Notes Section in PeriscopeS2G whether the proposal is being submitted for seawalls or for shorelines. Bidders may submit a proposal for seawalls or living shorelines.However,a firm interested in being considered for seawalls and living shorelines must submit two separate proposals -one proposal for seawalls and a separate proposal for shorelines. TAB2 ,erience &Qualifications of the Firm and Team 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm.Submit detailed information regarding the relevant experience and proven track record of the firm or its principals in providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation, including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies.Submit at least three (3) projects performed within the last ten (10)years as evidence of the requested experience. Bidders shall include prior experience which exemplifies experience with the following. a.Seawalls or Living Shorelines.Experience must include assessment,design,permitting,bidding services, and construction services of at least 400 continuous linear feet in length. b.Public Outreach. c.Projects involving state and federal grant funds. d.Projects involving challenging environmental conditions or unique design requirements. e.Innovative solutions or approaches to enhance a project's sustainability or efficiency. f.Use (design,permitting and implementation)of cutting-edge technology g.Local (defined as Miami Dade County)environmental conditions,regulatory constraints,and community expectations. 2.2 Qualifications of Bidder Team.Provide an organizational chart of all the prime Bidder's personnel and subconsultants,if applicable,each team members'qualifications and the role that each team member will play in providing the services detailed herein.A resume of each individual,including education,licensure,relevant experience,and any other pertinent information,shall be included for each respondent team member to be assigned to this contract. 2.2.1 Project Experience.Submit detailed information regarding the relevant experience and proven track record of each team member in providing the scope of services similar as identified in this solicitation,including experience in providing similar scope of services to public sector agencies.Submit at least three (3)projects performed within the last ten (10)years as evidence of the requested experience. Bidders shall include prior experience which exemplifies experience with the following. a.Seawalls or Living Shorelines.Experience must include assessment,design,permitting,bidding services, and construction services of at least 400 continuous linear feet in length. b.Public Outreach. c.Projects involving state and federal grant funds. d.Projects involving challenging environmental conditions or unique design requirements. e.Innovative solutions or approaches to enhance a project's sustainability or efficiency. f.Use (design,permitting and implementation)of cutting-edge technology g.Local (defined as Miami Dade County)environmental conditions,regulatory constraints,and community expectations. 2.3 Evidence of Prior Working Experience:lf sub-consultant(s)/sub-contractor(s)are included in the proposal, submit evidence that the proposed team has successfully collaborated on prior projects.For each project,submit the project description,agency name,agency contract,contact telephone &email,year(s),and term of en a ement. TAB 3 M IAM I BEACH roach and Methodolo 3.1 Submit detailed information on the proposed approach and methodology that the Bidder and its team have successfully utilized on previous engagements to accomplish a similar scope of work.The information to be provided within this tab should address,but need to be limited to the following: 1.Site Investigation and Feasibility Studies: •Conducting site surveys and investigations to assess the geological and environmental conditions. •Performing feasibility studies to determine the viability of a project. 2.Project Planning and Design: •Developing project plans,specifications,and design drawings. •Creating structural designs for infrastructure. 3.Bidding and Construction Management: •Assisting with the bidding phase of the project,including assisting with responding to request for information or clarifications from bidders. •Overseeing the construction process to ensure compliance with design plans and specifications. •Managing construction schedules,budgets,and resources. 4.Geotechnical Engineering: •Analyzing soil and rock conditions to determine their impact on construction projects. •Recommending appropriate foundations and earthworks. 5.Coastal Engineering: •Designing structures such as seawalls or living shorelines to ensure they are safe and stable. •Analyzing the structural integrity of existing structures and recommending repairs or modifications. 6.Environmental Engineering: •Addressing environmental concerns related to construction projects. 7.Risk Assessment and Mitigation: •Identifying potential risks associated with projects and developing strategies to mitigate them. •Ensuring compliance with safety regulations and standards. 8.Project Documentation and Reporting: •Generating reports,drawings,and documentation for clients,regulatory authorities,and other stakeholders. •Keeping detailed records of project progress and changes. 9.Maintenance and Rehabilitation: •Developing plans for the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. •Assessing the condition of structures and recommending repairs or upgrades. 10.Other Value-Added Services: •Describe any other value-added service that the Bidder can provide that will increase the success of the project. 3.2 Supplier Diversity.Submit details on plans to contract with small and minority businesses,women's business enter rises,and labor sur lus area firms. SECTION 0400 M IAM I BEACH PROPOSAL EVALUATION 1.EVALUATION COMMITTEE.An Evaluation Committee,appointed by the City Manager,may meet to evaluate each Proposal in accordance with the qualitative criteria set forth below.In doing so,the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals received,with or without requiring presentations.It is important to note that the Evaluation Committee is advisory only and does not make an award recommendation to the City Manager or the City Commission.The City Manager will utilize the results to take one of the following actions: a.In the event that only one responsive proposal is received,the City Manager,after determination that the sole responsive proposal materially meets the requirements of the RFQ,may,without an evaluation committee,recommend to the City Commission that the Administration enter into negotiations;or b.The City Manager may recommend that the City Commission authorize negotiations or award a contract to one or more firms in accordance with Section 0100,Sub-section 12;or c.The City Manager may Recommend that the City Commission short-list one or more firms for further consideration by the Evaluation Committee;or d.The City Manager may recommend to the City Commission that all firms,if more than one (1)responsive submittal is received,be rejected. 2.PRESENTATIONS BY SHORT-LISTED FIRMS.If a short-listing of firms responding to this RFQ is approved,the short-listed firms may be required to make presentations to and be interviewed by the Evaluation Committee.In further considering the short-listed firms,the Evaluation Committee will utilize the criteria set forth in Sub-section 4 below. 3.TECHNICAL ADVISORS.The City,at its discretion,may utilize technical or other advisers to assist the evaluation committee or the City Manager in evaluating proposals. 4.EVALUATION CRITERIA.Responsive,responsible proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria: Qualitative Criteria M ·p ·t (p •t A •d b E I t·C ·tt )aximum om 5oIntsssignety·valuauon ommrtee Experience and Qualifications of Proposing Firm Experience and Qualifications of the Team Approach and Methodology 40 30 30 TOTAL AVAILABLE POINTS for Qualitative Criteria 100 Quantitative Criteria M ·p ·t··ax1mum 'omn.s(Points Assigned by Procurement Department) Veterans Preference Prime Bidder Volume of Work (0-5 Points).Points awarded to the Bidder for volume of work awarded by the City in the last three (3)years in accordance with the following table: I Less than $250,000 I 5 I 5 5 MIAMI BEACH $250,000.01 -$2,000,000 Greater than $2,000,000 5.QUALITATIVE CRITERIA.The Evaluation Committee shall review responsive,responsible proposals and assign points for the qualitative factors only.The Evaluation Committee shall not consider quantitative factors (e.g.veteran's preference)in its review of proposals.The Evaluation Committee shall act solely in an advisory capacity to the City Manager.The results of the Evaluation Committee process do not constitute an award recommendation.The City Manager may utilize,but is not bound by,the results of the Evaluation Committee process,as well as consider any feedback or information provided by staff,consultants or any other third-party in developing an award recommendation in accordance with Section 0100,Sub-section 10.In its review of proposals received,the Evaluation Committee may review and score all proposals,with or without conducting interview sessions,in accordance with the evaluation criteria. 6.QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA.Following the results of the evaluation of the qualitative criteria by the Evaluation Committee,the Bidders may receive additional points,to be added by City staff. Veterans'Preference points will be assigned in accordance with Section 2-37 4 of the City Code. 7.DETERMINATION OF FINAL RANKING.The sum of the evaluation criteria points will be converted to rankings in accordance with the example below: Bidder A Bidder B Bidder C Q ualitative Points 82 74 80 C om m itt ee Q uantitative Points 5 5 0 M em ber 1 Total 87 79 80 R ank 1 3 2 Q ualitative Points 82 85 72 C om m itt ee Q uantitative Points 5 5 0 M em be r 2 Total 87 90 72 Rank 1 2 3 Q ualitative Points 90 74 66 C om m itt ee Q uantitative Points 5 5 0 M em ber 2 Total 95 79 66 Rank 1 2 3 Low A ggregate Score 3 7 8 Final R anking*1 2 3 It is important to note that the results of the proposal evaluation process in accordance with Section 0400 does not represent an award recommendation.The City Manager will utilize the results of the proposal evaluation process,and any other information he deems appropriate,to develop an award recommendation to the City Commission,which may differ from the results of the proposal evaluation process and final rankings. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank MIAMI BEACH APPENDIX A MIAMI BEACH Special Conditions 2024-234-ND ENGINEERING SERVICES FO R SEWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3d Floor Miam i Beach,Florida 33139 MIAMI BEACH 1.TERM OF CONTRACT.The term of the Agreement resulting from this RFQ shall be for an initial term of three (3)years. 2.OPTION TO RENEW.The City,through its City Manager,will have the option to extend for one (1)two-year renewal term or two (2)one-year renewal terms at the City Manager's sole discretion.The successful contractor shall maintain,for the entirety of any renewal period,the same cost,terms,and conditions included within the originally awarded contract.Continuation of the contract beyond the initial period,and any option subsequently exercised,is a City prerogative,and not a right of the successful contractor. 3.ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS.This RFQ,including the attached Contract,contains all the terms and conditions applicable to any service being provided to the City resulting from award of contract.By virtue of submitting a proposal,consultant agrees not to require additional terms and conditions at the time services are requested,either through a separate agreement,work order,letter of engagement or purchase order. 4.CHANGE OF PROJECT MANAGER.A change in the consultant's project manager (as well as any replacement)shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (who in this case shall be an Assistant City Manager).Replacement (including reassignment)of an approved project manager or public information officer shall not be made without submitting a resume for the replacement staff person and receiving prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e.the City project manager). 5.SUB-CONSULTANTS.The consultant shall not retain,add,or replace any sub-consultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager,in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution.Any approval of a sub-consultant by the City Manager shall not in any way shift the responsibility for the quality and acceptability by the City of the services performed by the sub-consultant from the Consultant to the City. The quality of services and acceptability to the City of the services performed by sub- consultants shall be the sole responsibility of consultant. 6.LICENSURE.consultant shall hold a "Certificate of Authorization"by the State of Florida, Division of Business and Professional Regulations,as applicable,at the time of bid. 6.1 Throughout the term of any resulting agreement,the consultant shall assure that all work on any City project is performed by licensed individuals,in accordance with the requirements of the State of Florida at the time of bid. MIAMI BEACH APPENDIX B M IAM I BEACH Sample Contract 2024-234-N D ENG IN EERIN G SERVICES FOR SEWALLS AND LIV IN G SHORELINES BY VIRTUE OF SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL THE FIRM HEREBY TAKES NO EXCEPTIONS TO THE TERM AND CONDITIONS NOTED IN THIS SAMPLE CONTRACT PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 M eridian Avenue,3d Floor M iam i Beach,Florida 33139 AGREEMENT BETW EEN CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND FOR RESOLUTION NO.xxxxxxx 1 DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE 1.DEFINITIONS 4 ARTICLE 2.BASIC SERVICES 9 ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 144 ARTICLE 4.RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTON COST 154 ARTICLE 5.ADDITIONAL SERVICES 177 ARTICLE 6.REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 19 ARTICLE 7.COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 20 ARTICLE 8.CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 21 ARTICLE 9.OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 21 ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 22 ARTICLE 11.INSURA NCE 23 ARTICLE 12.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 244 ARTICLE 13.ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 255 ARTICLE 14.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 255 ARTICLE 15.NOTICE 265 ARTICLE 16.FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW 306 ARTICLE 17.INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT RIGHTS 28 ARTCILE 18.MISCELLANEUS PROVISIONS 29 SCHEDULES: SCHEDULE A 36 SCHEDULE B 38 SCHEDULE C 39 2 ATTACHED SEPARATELY: ATTACHMENT A:Resolution and Commission Award ATTACHMENT B:Addenda and Request for Qualifications (RFQ)Solicitation ATTACHMENT C:Consultant Proposal Response to RFQ and Sunbiz 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND 300 ENGINEERING GROUP,P.A. FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SPECIALIZED CATEGORIES "AS-NEEDED"BASIS This Agreement made and entered into this (Effective Date),by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida,having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach, Florida,33139,{hereinafter referred to as City),and XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.,a Florida corporation having its principal office at MMXX (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WIT N E S S ET H: WHEREAS,on [DATE],the City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications No.XXXX-XXX-XX xxxxxxxxxxxx"(the RFQ);and WHEREAS the RFQ was intended to provide access to architectural and engineering consulting firms in accordance with the Florida Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act for future work as the need may arise;and WHEREAS,on [DATE],the City Commission approved Resolution No.xxxx-xxxx, authorizing the City to enter into negotiations with [COMPANY NAME]and,if successful, execute an agreement with the Consultant pursuant to the RFQ;and WHEREAS,City and the Consultant have negotiated the following agreement pursuant to the RFQ;and NOW THEREFORE,City and Consultant,in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained,agree as follows: ARTICLE 1.DEFINITIONS 1.1 Definitions.The definitions included in this Section are not exhaustive of all definitions used in this Agreement.Additional terms may be defined in other Contract Documents.The following terms shall have the meanings specified herein unless otherwise stated herein: ADDITIONAL SERVICES:"Additional Services"shall mean those services,in addition to the Basic Services in this Agreement,as described in Article 5 and the Consultant Service Order, which the Consultant shall perform,at the City's option,and which must be duly authorized,in 4 writing,by the City Manager or his authorized designee,prior to commencement of same. APPLICABLE LAWS:"Applicable Laws"means all laws,statutes,codes (including,but not limited to,building codes),ordinances,rules,regulations,lawful orders and decrees of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project,the Project Site or the Parties. BASE BID:"Base Bid"shall mean the elements contained in the Construction Documents recommended by the Consultant (and approved by the City)as being within the Construction Cost Budget."Base Bid"shall not include additive alternates or deductive alternates. BASIC SERVICES:"Basic Services"shall include those services which Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement,as described in Article 2 and the Consultant Service Order.Any Services not specifically enumerated as Additional Services (as defined herein)shall also be considered Basic Services. CITY (OR OWNER):The "City"shall mean the City of Miami Beach,a Florida municipal corporation having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach,Florida, 33139.In all respects hereunder,City's obligations and performance is pursuant to City's position as the owner of the Project acting in its proprietary capacity.In the event City exercises its regulatory authority as a governmental body including,but not limited to,its regulatory authority for code inspections and issuance of Building Department permits,Public Works Department permits,or other applicable permits within its jurisdiction,the exercise of such regulatory authority and the enforcement of any Applicable Laws shall be deemed to have occurred pursuant to City's regulatory authority as a governmental body and shall not be attributable in any manner to City as a Party to this Agreement. CITY COMMISSION:"City Commission"shall mean the governing and legislative body of the City. CITY MANAGER:The "City Manager"shall mean the chief administrative officer of the City. The City Manager shall also be construed to include any duly authorized representatives designated by the City Manager in writing,including the Project Administrator,with respect to any specific matter(s)concerning the Services and/or this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Commission under this Agreement,or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). CONSTRUCTION COST BUDGET:The "Construction Cost Budget"shall mean the amount budgeted and established by the City to provide for the cost of construction of the Work for the Project ("Construction Cost"),as set forth in the Consultant Service Order. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS:"Construction Documents"shall mean the final (100% completed)plans,technical specifications,drawings,schematics,documents,and diagrams prepared by the architect/engineer of record for the Project,setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project.The Construction Documents shall set forth in full all details necessary to complete the construction of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents.Construction Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents, until (a)the Consultant has submitted completed Construction Documents to the City and (b) they have been reviewed and approved by the City and any agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as otherwise provided by the Contract Documents. 5 CONSULTANT:The named entity on page 1 of this Agreement,the "Consultant"shall mean the qualified and properly professionally licensed professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities,agencies,boards,governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the professional has been engaged by City and who will perform (or cause to be performed through subconsultants acceptable to the City)all Services required under this Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order.When the term "Consultant"is used in this Agreement it shall also be deemed to include any officers,employees,or agents of Consultants,and any other person or entity acting under the supervision,direction,or control of Consultant to provide any Services or similar professional services with respect to a Project ("subconsultants").The Consultant shall not be replaced by any other entity,except as otherwise permitted in this Agreement.Further,any subconsultant that may perform Services on behalf of the Consultant shall be a qualified and properly professionally licensed professional in the State of Florida and as otherwise required by any entities,agencies,boards,governmental authorities and/or any other professional organizations with jurisdiction governing the professional practice area for which the subconsultant has been engaged by Consultant to perform professional services in connection with the Project.The subconsultants in Schedule "D",attached hereto,are hereby approved by the City Manager for the Project. CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER:Consultant Service Order (CSO)shall mean the work order issued by the City to Consultant (in substantial form as in Schedule A attached hereto),that specifically describes and delineates the particular Services (Basic Services and/or Additional Services)which will be required of Consultant for the Project that is the subject of such Consultant Service Order,and which may include studies or study activity,and/or professional services as defined in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes. CONTRACT AMENDMENT:"Contract Amendment"shall mean a written modification to the Agreement approved by the City (as specified below)and executed between City and Consultant,covering changes,additions,or reductions in the terms of this Agreement including, without limitation,authorizing a change in the Services,or the method and manner of performance thereof,or an adjustment in the fee and/or completion dates. Contract Amendments shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02.The City Manager reserves the right to seek and obtain concurrence of the City Commission for approval of any such Contract Amendment. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:"Contract Documents"shall mean this Agreement (together with all exhibits,addenda,Consultant Service Orders and written amendments issued thereto),and all Design Documents and Construction Documents.The Contract Documents shall also include,without limitation (together with all exhibits,addenda,and written amendments issued thereto),the Request for Qualifications (RFQ),instructions to bidders,bid form,bid bond, Design Criteria Package (if any),the Contract for Construction,surety payment and performance bonds,Conditions of the Contract for Construction (General,Supplementary,and other Conditions),Divisions 0-17 specifications,an approved Change Order(s),approved Construction Change Directive(s),and/or approved written order(s)for a minor change in the Work. CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION:"Contract for Construction"shall mean the legally binding agreement between City and Consultant for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents,including,without limitation,a general Consultant,construction manager,design- 6 builder or any other duly licensed construction Consultant selected pursuant to any other procurement methodology available under Florida law. CONTRACTOR:"Contractor"shall mean the individual or individuals,firm,company, corporation,joint venture,or other entity contracting with City for performance of the Work covered in the Contract Documents. DESIGN CRITERIA PACKA GE or DCP:"Design Criteria Package"means concise, performance-oriented drawings or specifications of a design-build Project,prepared for the purpose of furnishing sufficient information to permit design-build firms to prepare a bid or a response to a City request for proposal,or to permit the City to enter into a negotiated design- build contract.The Design Criteria Package must specify performance-based criteria for the design-build Project,including the legal description of the site,survey information concerning the site,interior space requirements,material quality standards,schematic layouts and conceptual design criteria of the project,cost or budget estimates,design and construction schedules,site development requirements,provisions for utilities,stormwater retention and disposal,and parking requirements applicable to the project. DESIGN DOCUMENTS:"Design Documents"means all plans,drawings specifications, schematics and all other documents which set forth in full the design of the Project and fix and describe in detail the size,configuration and character of the Project concerning all items of the Project necessary for the final preparation of the 100%completed,permitted Construction Documents in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents including,without limitation,all architectural and engineering elements as may be appropriate.Design Documents shall not be part of the Contract Documents,until (a)the Consultant has submitted completed Design Documents to the City and (b)they have been reviewed and approved by the City and agencies having jurisdiction in accordance with the procedures as provided by the Contract Documents.However,approval by the City shall not in any way be construed,interpreted and/or deemed to constitute a waiver or excuse Consultant's obligations to ensure the Design Documents are constructible,in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with the Contract Documents. PROJECT:The "Project"shall mean that certain City capital project described in the Consultant Service Order. Project Cost:The "Project Cost"shall mean the estimated total cost of the Project,as described in the Consultant Service Order (CSO) Project Scope:The "Project Scope"shall mean the description of the Project,as described in the Consultant Service Order (CSO). PROJECT ADMINISTRA TOR:The "Project Administrator"shall mean the individual designated by the City Manager who shall be the City's authorized representative to issue directives and notices on behalf of the City with respect to all matters concerning the Services of this Agreement (exclusive of those authorizations reserved to the City Manager or City Commission under this Agreement,or to regulatory or administrative bodies having jurisdiction over the Project). PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS:"Proposal Documents"shall mean the RFQ,together with all amendments or addenda thereto (if any),which is incorporated by reference to this Agreement 7 and made a part hereof;provided,however,that in the event of an express conflict between the Proposal Documents and this Agreement,the Agreement shall prevail.Consultant's proposal in response to the RFQ is included for reference purposes only and shall not be incorporated as part of this Agreement,except with respect to Consultant's representations regarding the qualifications and experience of Consultant and its key personnel,its commitment to provide the key personnel listed therein,and its capability to perform and deliver the Services in accordance with this Agreement and consistent with the all representations made therein. SCHEDULES:"Schedules"shall mean the various schedules attached to this Agreement and referred to as follows: Schedule A-Consultant Service Order Schedule A-1 --Consultant Compensation Schedule B-Hourly Rate Schedule Schedule -Approved Subconsultants SCOPE OF SERVICES:"Scope of Services"shall include the Project Scope,Basic Services, and any Additional Services (as approved by the City),all as described in Schedule "A"hereto. SERVICES:"Services"shall mean all services,work,and actions by the Consultant performed pursuant to or undertaken under this Agreement,including services delineated as part of the Scope of Services. SOFT COSTS:"Soft Costs"shall mean costs related to the Project other than Construction Cost including,without limitation,Consultant's Basic Services,Additional Services,surveys, testing,general consultant,financing,permitting fees and other similar costs,as determined by the City,that are not considered as direct costs for the construction of the Project. WORK:"Work"shall mean all labor,materials,equipment,supplies,tools,machinery,utilities, fabrication,transportation,insurance,bonds,permits and conditions thereof,building code changes and government approvals,licenses,tests,quality assurance and/or quality control inspections and related certifications,surveys,studies,and other items,work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction,installation,and functioning of the Project,together with all additional,collateral and incidental items,and work and services required for delivery of a completed,fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST:The "Statement of Probable Construction Cost"shall mean the detailed estimate prepared by Consultant in Construction Standard Index (CSI)format or other format approved by the Project Administrator,which includes the Consultant's estimated total construction cost to the City of the Work for the Project (as established in the Contract Documents,as they may be amended from time to time).The Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element of the Project and include a breakdown of the fees,general conditions and construction contingency for the Project.Costs shall be adjusted to the projected bid date to take into account anticipated price escalation. WORK:"Work"shall mean all labor,materials,equipment,supplies,tools,machinery,utilities, fabrication,transportation,insurance,bonds,permits and conditions thereof,building code changes and government approvals,licenses,tests,quality assurance and/or quality control 8 inspections and related certifications,surveys,studies,and other items,work and services that are necessary or appropriate for the total construction,installation,and functioning of the Project,together with all additional,collateral and incidental items,and work and services required for delivery of a completed,fully functional and functioning Project as set forth in the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2.BASIC SERVICES 2.1 The Consultant shall provide Basic Services for the Project,specifically described in the Consultant Service Order. 2.2 The Services will be commenced by the Consultant upon receipt of a written Consultant Service Order signed by the City Manager or the Project Administrator.Consultant shall countersign the Consultant Service Order upon receipt and return the signed copy to the City. Consultant Service Orders shall be executed in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended.Any CSO not executed in accordance herewith shall be null and void. 2.3 As it relates to the Services and the Project,Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is knowledgeable of and shall comply with all Applicable Laws.The Consultant agrees to comply with all Applicable Laws,whether now in effect or as may be amended or adopted from time to time and shall further take into account all known pending changes to the foregoing of which it should reasonably be aware. 2.4 The Consultant warrants and represents to the City that all of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standard of care normally exercised in comparable projects in South Florida.Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is experienced,fully qualified,and properly licensed (pursuant to Applicable Laws)to perform the Services.Consultant warrants and represents to the City that it is responsible for the technical accuracy of the Services. 2.5 The Consultant's Basic Services may consist of various tasks,including planning, design,bidding/award,preparation of a DCP,studies,construction administration,and Additional Services (as may be approved),all as further described in the Consultant Service Order;and shall also include any and all of Consultant's responsibilities and obligations with respect to the Project,as set forth in the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 2.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES:No action or omission by City shall waive or excuse Consultant's obligations under the Agreement and/or other Contract Documents and that Consultant shall remain fully liable for all work performed by Consultant including,without limitation,any design errors or omissions (if applicable to the services performed by Consultant).Written decisions and/or approvals issued by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Consultant (or any subconsultants),for the accuracy and competency of the Services,nor shall any City approval and/or decisions be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for a defect, error or omission in the Services.Moreover,neither the City's inspection,review,approval or acceptance of,nor payment for,any Services required under the Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Consultant (or any subconsultant)of its obligations and responsibilities under the Agreement,nor constitute a waiver of any of the City's rights under the Agreement,or of any 9 cause of action arising out of the performance of the Agreement.The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City in accordance with Applicable Laws for all damages to City caused by any failure of the Consultant or to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement or by the Consultant's misconduct,unlawful acts,negligent acts,errors or omissions in the performance of the Agreement. 2.7 TIME:It is understood that time is of the essence in the completion of the Project and,in this respect,the parties agree as follows: 2.7.1 Term:The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by the City and Consultant,which shall be the Effective Date referred to on page 1 hereof,and shall be in effect for three (3)years ("Initial Term"),plus two (2),one (1)year renewal options, to be exercised at the sole discretion of the City Manager (Initial Term and any renewals shall be collectively referred to as the "Term").Notwithstanding the preceding Term, Consultant shall adhere to any and all timelines and/or deadlines,as set forth in the Consultant Service Order,including the time for completion of the work and/or services for such Project (as set forth in the particular Consultant Service Order). 2.7.2 The Consultant shall perform the Services as expeditiously as is consistent with the standard of professional skill and care required by this Agreement,and the orderly progress of the Work. 2.7.3 Recognizing that the construction of other projects within the City may affect scheduling of the construction for the Project,the Consultant shall diligently coordinate performance of the Services with the City (through the Project Administrator)in order to provide for the safe,expeditious,economical and efficient completion of the Project, without negatively impacting concurrent work by others. 2.7.4 The Services shall be performed in a manner that shall conform to the Consultant Service Order.The Consultant may submit requests for an adjustment to the Consultant Service Order completion time,if made necessary because of undue delays resulting from untimely review taken by the City (or authorities having jurisdiction over the Project) to approve the Consultant's submissions,or any other portion of the Services requiring approval by the City (or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project).Consultant shall immediately provide the Project Administrator with written notice stating the reason for the particular delay;the requested adjustment (i.e. extension)to the Project Schedule;and a revised anticipated schedule of completion. Upon receipt and review of Consultant's request (and such other documentation as the Project Administrator may require),the Project Administrator may grant a reasonable extension of time for completion of the particular work involved,and authorize that the appropriate adjustment be made to the Project Schedule.The Project Administrator's approval (if granted)shall be in writing. 2.8 Consultant shall use its best efforts to maintain a constructive,professional,cooperative working relationship with the Project Administrator,Consultant,and any and all other individuals and/or firms that have been contracted,or otherwise retained,to perform work on the Project. 2.9 The Consultant shall perform its duties under this Agreement,and under a Consultant Service Order,in a competent,timely and professional manner,and shall be responsible to the City for any failure in its performance,except to the extent that acts or omissions by the City 10 make such performance impossible. 2.10 The Consultant is responsible for the professional quality,technical accuracy, completeness,performance and coordination of all Services required under the Agreement and under the Consultant Service Order (including the services performed by subconsultants),within the specified time period and specified cost.The Consultant shall perform the Services utilizing the skill,knowledge,and judgment ordinarily possessed and used by a proficient consultant with respect to the disciplines required for the performance of such Services in the State of Florida. The Consultant is responsible for and shall represent to City that the Services conform to the City's requirements,the Contract Documents and all Applicable Laws.The Consultant shall be and remain liable to the City for all damages to the City caused by the Consultant's negligent acts or errors or omissions in the performance of the Services.In addition to all other rights and remedies which the City may have,the Consultant shall,at its expense,re-perform all or any portion of the Services to correct any deficiencies which result from the Consultant's failure to perform in accordance with the above standards.The Consultant shall also be liable for the replacement or repair of any defective materials and equipment and for the cost of the re- performance of any non-conforming construction work resulting from such deficient Services (i) for a period from the Effective Date of this Agreement,until twelve (12)months following final acceptance of the Work.The Project Administrator shall notify the Consultant,in writing,of any deficiencies and shall approve the method and timing of the corrections. 2.11 The City shall have the right,at any time,in its sole and absolute discretion,to submit for review to other consultants (engaged by the City at its expense)any or all parts of the Services and the Consultant shall fully cooperate in such review(s).Whenever others are required to verify,review,or consider any Services performed by Consultant (including,without limitation, Consultants,other design professionals,and/or other consultants retained by the City),the intent of such requirement is to enable the Consultant to receive input from others'professional expertise to identify any discrepancies,errors or omissions that are inconsistent with industry standards relating to comparable projects;or which are inconsistent with Applicable Laws;or which are inconsistent with standards,decisions or approvals provided by the City under this Agreement.Consultant will use reasonable care and skill,in accordance and consistent with customary professional standards,in responding to items identified by other reviewers in accordance with this subsection.Consultant shall receive comments from reviewers,in writing. Consultant shall address comments forwarded to it in a timely manner.The term "timely"shall be defined to mean as soon as possible under the circumstances,taking into account the timelines of the Project schedule. 2.11.1 The Consultant is advised that a performance evaluation of the Services rendered throughout this Agreement will be completed by the City and kept in the City's files for evaluation of future solicitations. 2.12 Consultant agrees that when any portion of the Services relates to a professional service which,under Florida Statutes,requires a license,certificate of authorization,or other form of legal entitlement to practice and/or perform such Service(s),it shall employ and/or retain only qualified duly licensed certified personnel to provide same. 2.13 Consultant agrees to designate,in writing,within five (5)calendar days after receiving a fully executed Consultant Service Order,a qualified licensed professional to serve as its project manager (hereinafter referred to as the "Project Manager").The Project Manager shall be authorized and responsible to act on behalf of Consultant with respect to directing,coordinating 11 and administrating all aspects of the Services.Consultant's Project Manager (as well as any replacement)shall be subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager or the Project Administrator.Replacement (including reassignment)of an approved Project Manager shall not be made without the prior written approval of the City Manager or his designee (i.e.the Project Administrator). 2.13.1 Consultant agrees,within fourteen (14)calendar days of receipt of written notice from the City Manager or the Project Administrator (which notice shall state the cause therefore),to promptly remove and replace a Project Manager,or any other personnel employed or otherwise retained by Consultant for the Project (including,without limitation,any subconsultants). 2.14 Consultant agrees not to divulge,furnish or make available to any third party(ies),any non-public information concerning the Services or the Project,without the prior written consent of the City Manager or the Project Administrator,unless such disclosure is incident to the proper performance of the Services;or the disclosure is required pursuant to Florida Public Records laws;or,in the course of judicial proceedings,where such information has been properly subpoenaed.Consultant shall also require subconsultants to comply with this subsection. 2.15 The City and Consultant acknowledge that the Services,as described in the Agreement and the Consultant Service Order,do not delineate every detail and minor work task required to be performed by Consultant to complete the work and/or services described and delineated under a Consultant Service Order issued to Consultant by the City for a particular Project.If, during the course of performing work,services and/or tasks on a particular Consultant Service Order,Consultant determines that work and/or services should be performed (to complete the Project delineated under such Order)which is,in the Consultant's reasonable opinion,outside the level of effort originally anticipated in the Consultant Service Order,then Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Administrator,in writing,and shall obtain the Project Administrator's written consent before proceeding with such work and/or services.If Consultant proceeds with any such additional work and/or services without obtaining the prior written consent of the Project Administrator,said work and/or services shall be deemed to be a Basic Service under this Agreement and shall also be deemed to be within the scope of services delineated in the Consultant Service Order (whether or not specifically addressed in the Scope of Services).Mere notice by Consultant to the Project Administrator shall not constitute authorization or approval by the City to perform such work.Performance of any such work and/or services by Consultant without the prior written consent of the Project Administrator shall be undertaken at Consultant's sole risk and liability. 2.16 Consultant shall establish,maintain,and categorize any and all Project documents and records pertinent to the Services and shall provide the City,upon request,with copies of any and all such documents and/or records.In addition,Consultant shall provide electronic document files to the City upon completion of the Project. 2.17 THE CITY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO ASSIST,FACILITATE AND/OR PERFORM IN ANY WAY THE CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRA CT DOCUMENTS.THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION,FACILITATION AND/OR ASSISTANCE TO THE CONSULTANT SHALL BE AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION AND SHALL NOT,IN ANY WAY,BE CONSTRUED,INTERPRETED AND/OR CONSTITUTE AN ASSUMPTION BY THE CITY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS,A WAIVER OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS AND/OR EXCUSE ANY BREACH BY CONSULTANT OF 12 ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.THE PARTICIPATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY FROM DECLARING CONSULTANT IN DEFAULT FOR CONSULTANT'S FAILURE TO PERFORM SUCH OBLIGATION,NOR SHALL IT LIMIT,IN ANY WAY,THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND REMEDIES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.THE CONSULTANT EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES NOT TO RA ISE OR ASSERT AS DEFENSE TO ANY CLAIM,ACTION,SUIT AND/OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF A SIMILAR NATURE,THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION,ASSISTANCE AND/OR FACILITATION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSULTANT'S OBLIGATIONS.INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,ASSISTING WITH OBTAINING PERMITS OR WITH COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES,OR OTHER MATTERS RELATED TO THE PROJECT.IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS SECTION AND/OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR OTHER CONTRA CT DOCUMENTS,THIS SECTION SHALL GOVERN. 2.18 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS:If applicable,the Consultant shall comply with the requirements of Section 255.2575,Florida Statutes,and Chapter 100 of the City Code,as both may be amended from time to time,addressing applicable Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)compliance requirements. 2.19 SUBCONSULTANTS:All services provided by subconsultants shall be consistent with those commitments made by the Consultant in its Proposal and during the competitive solicitation selection process and interview.Such services shall be undertaken and performed pursuant to appropriate written agreements between the Consultant and the subconsultants, which shall contain provisions that preserve and protect the rights of the City under this Agreement.Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between the City and the subconsultants. The Consultant shall not retain,add,or replace any subconsultant without the prior written approval of the City Manager,in response to a written request from the Consultant stating the reasons for any proposed substitution.The Consultant shall cause the names of subconsultants responsible for significant portions of the Services to be inserted on the plans and specifications. The Consultant shall be ultimately responsible for ensuring the Consultant's and all of its subconsultants'compliance with the requirements of this Section and any other provision of the Agreement and/or Consultant Service Order.With respect to the performance of work by subconsultants,the Consultant shall,in approving and accepting such work,ensure the professional quality,completeness,and coordination of the subconsultant's work. The Consultant shall,upon the request of the City,submit to the City such documentation and information as the City reasonably requests to evidence the creation,standing,ownership and professional licensure of the Consultant (and subconsultants),including organizational documents,operating agreements and professional licensure documentation,and copies of the Consultant's contracts with the subconsultant with respect to the Project.However,the City's failure to request such documentation or evidence and/or failure to enforce in any way the terms and provisions of this Section,the Agreement and/or any other Consultant Service Order during the Project does not excuse,waive and/or condone in any way any noncompliance of the requirements set forth therein including,without limitation,the professional licensure requirements.Any approval of a subconsultant by the City shall in no way shift from the Consultant to City the responsibility for the quality and acceptability of the services performed by 13 the subconsultant.Payment of subconsultants shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant and shall not be cause for any increase in compensation to the Consultant for payment of the Services. ARTICLE 3.THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The City Manager shall designate a Project Administrator,who shall be the City's authorized representative to act on City's behalf with respect to the City's responsibilities or matters requiring City's approval under the Contract Documents.The Project Administrator shall be authorized (without limitation)to transmit instructions,receive information,and interpret and define City policies and decisions with respect to the Services and the Project.The Project Administrator shall have full authority to require the Consultant to comply with the Contract Documents,provided,however,that any failure of the Project Administrator to identify any noncompliance,or to specifically direct or require compliance,shall in no way constitute a waiver of,or excuse,the Consultant's obligation to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 3.2 The City shall make available to Consultant,for the convenience of the Consultant only, information that the City has in its possession pertinent to the Project.Consultant hereby agrees and acknowledges that,in making any such information available to Consultant,the City makes no express or implied certification,warranty,and/or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information and assumes no responsibility whatsoever with respect to, the sufficiency,completeness or accuracy of such information.The Consultant understands, and hereby agrees and acknowledges,that it is obligated to verify to the extent it deems necessary all information furnished by the City,and that it is solely responsible for the accuracy and applicability of all such information used by Consultant.Such verification shall include, without limitation,visual examination of existing conditions in all locations encompassed by the Project,where such examination can be made without using destructive measures (i.e. excavation or demolition).Survey information shall be spot checked to the extent that Consultant has satisfied itself as to the reliability of the information. 3.3 At any time,in his/her sole discretion,the City Manager may furnish accounting,and insurance counseling services for the Project (including,without limitation,auditing services to verify the Consultant's applications for payment,or to ascertain that Consultant has properly remitted payment due to its subconsultants or vendors). 3.4 If the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project,or non-conformance with the Contract Documents,the City,through the Project Administrator, shall give prompt written notice thereof to the Consultant. 3.5 The City,acting in its proprietary capacity as Owner and not in its regulatory capacity, shall render any administrative approvals and decisions required under this Agreement,in writing,as reasonably expeditious for the orderly progress of the Services and of the Work. 3.6 The City Commission shall be the final authority to do or to approve the following actions or conduct,by passage of an enabling resolution or amendment to this Agreement: 3.6.1 The City Commission shall be the body to consider,comment upon,or approve any assignment,sale,transfer or subletting of this Agreement.Assignment and transfer shall be defined to also include sale of the majority of the stock of a corporate 14 consultant. 3.6.2 Contract Amendments shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended. 3.7 Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement,the City Manager shall serve as the City's primary representative to whom administrative (proprietary)requests for decisions and approvals required hereunder by the City shall be made.Except where otherwise expressly noted in this Agreement or the Contract Documents,the City Manager shall issue decisions and authorizations which may include,without limitation,proprietary review,approval,or comment upon the schedules,plans,reports,estimates,contracts,and other documents submitted to the City by Consultant. 3.7 .1 The City Manager shall have prior review and approval of the Project Manager (and any replacements)and of any subconsultants (and any replacements). 3.7.2 The City Manager shall decide and render administrative (proprietary)decisions on matters arising pursuant to this Agreement which are not otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement.In his/her discretion,the City Manager may also consult with the City Commission on such matters. 3.7.3 At the request of Consultant,the City Manager shall be authorized,but not required,to reallocate monies already budgeted toward payment of the Consultant; provided,however,that the Consultant's compensation (or other budgets established by this Agreement)may not be increased without the prior approval of the City Commission, which approval (if granted at all)shall be in its sole and reasonable discretion. 3.7.4 Contract Amendments shall be approved in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended. 3.7.5 The City Manager may,in his/her sole discretion,form a committee or committees,or inquire of,or consult with,persons for the purpose of receiving advice and recommendations relating to the exercise of the City's powers,duties,and responsibilities under this Agreement or the Contract Documents. 3.7.6 The City Manager shall be the City Commission's authorized representative with regard to acting on behalf of the City in the event of issuing any default notice(s)under this Agreement,and,should such default remain uncured,in terminating the Agreement (pursuant to and in accordance with Article 10 hereof). 3.8 The City's review,evaluation,or comment as to any documents prepared by or on behalf of the Consultant shall be solely for the purpose of the City's determining for its own satisfaction the suitability of the Project,or portions thereof,detailed in such documents for the purposes intended therefor by the City,and may not be relied upon in any way by the Consultant or any other third party as a substantive review thereof. ARTICLE 4.RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 4.1 The City shall establish a Construction Cost Budget for the Project,as set forth in the 15 Consultant Service Order.Consultant shall design the Project so that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project is not exceeded.As part of the Basic Services,Consultant shall design and/or re-design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget in accordance with this Article 4, making all revisions necessary to maintain the Construction Cost Budget.Consultant shall attend meetings with the City to review and discuss cost estimates,cost-saving alternatives, and implementation or revision of the Design Documents and Construction Documents to address such items,as necessary to meet the established budget parameters set forth in the City Construction Budget. 4.2.Consultant shall provide and/or update the Statement of Probable Construction Cost at each stage of completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents,unless otherwise specified in a written directive of the Project Administrator. 4.2.1.At completion of the conceptual design (at such stage of completion of the Design Documents as may be specified by the Project Administrator),Consultant shall provide the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost,which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus fifteen percent (+/-15%)of the Construction Cost Budget.If at the foregoing stage of design,the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than fifteen percent (15%),then the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant. Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform to the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within fifteen percent (15%)of the City's Construction Budget.Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications,Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.2.At the 30%and 60%completion of the Design Documents,Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost,which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus ten percent (+/-10%)of the Construction Cost Budget.If at the foregoing stages of design,the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than ten percent (10%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant.Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform to the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within ten percent (10%)of the City's Construction Budget.Upon obtaining City's approval of any proposed modifications,Consultant shall incorporate such modifications within the Design Documents as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.3.At the 90%stage completion of the Design Documents and at completion of the Construction Documents,Consultant shall update its Statement of Probable Construction Cost, which must include an estimated Construction Cost for the Project within a range of plus or minus five percent (+/-5%)of the Construction Cost Budget.If at the foregoing stages of design, the Consultant's Statement of Probable Construction Cost exceeds the City's Construction Budget by more than five percent (5%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant.Consultant shall then identify the cause(s)for the difference and recommend in writing for the City's approval any modification in the Design Documents necessary to conform to the Consultant's estimated total costs in the Statement of Probable Construction Cost to within five percent (5%)of the City's Construction Budget.Upon obtaining the City's approval, 16 Consultant shall promptly modify the Design Documents or Construction Documents within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90)days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design),as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City. 4.2.4.To ensure that the Construction Cost shall not exceed the City's Construction Budget,each Statement of Probable Construction Cost shall be in sufficient detail to identify the costs of each element and include a breakdown of the fees,general conditions and a reasonable and appropriate construction contingency. 4.3.Consultant shall certify and warrant to the City that the Statement of Probable Construction Cost and any update thereto,represents Consultant's best judgment of the Construction Cost for the Project as an experienced design professional familiar with the construction industry,provided,however,that Consultant cannot (and does not)guarantee that bids or negotiated prices will not vary from any estimates of Construction Cost or other cost evaluation(s)prepared (or otherwise provided)by Consultant. 4.4 If the lowest and best Base Bid exceeds the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost by more than ten percent (10%),the Project Administrator shall provide notice thereof to the Consultant,and the Consultant shall re-design the Project within the Project Scope,construction schedule,sequence of Work,or such other action,as deemed necessary, to reduce the Statement of Probable Construction Cost,and Consultant shall provide any required revisions to the Contract Documents (including,without limitation,the Construction Documents)within the time period specified by the Project Administrator (which time period for completion shall not exceed ninety (90)days from the date Consultant is notified to re-design), and shall provide re-bidding services,as many times as may be reasonably requested by the City,as part of the Basic Services and at no additional cost to the City,in order to bring any resulting,responsive and responsible bids within ten percent (10%)of the Consultant's final updated Statement of Probable Cost. 4.5.The Construction Cost Budget shall not be exceeded without fully justifiable, extraordinary,and unforeseen circumstances (such as Force Majeure)which are beyond the control of the parties.Any expenditure above this amount shall be subject to prior City Commission approval which,if granted at all,shall be at the sole and reasonable discretion of the City Commission.The City Commission shall have no obligation to approve an increase in the Construction Cost Budget and,if such Construction Cost Budget is exceeded,the City Commission may,at its sole and absolute discretion,terminate this Agreement (and the remaining Services)without any further liability to the City. 4.6.The City Commission may,at its sole and absolute discretion,and without relieving Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement to design the Project to the Construction Cost Budget as set forth in Sections 4.1 through 4.5 above,separately elect any of the following options:(1)approve an increase to the Construction Cost Budget;(2)reject all bids,and (at its option)authorize rebidding of the Project;(3)abandon the Project and terminate the remaining Services without any further liability to the City;(4)select as many deductive alternatives as may be necessary to bring the lowest and best bid within the Construction Cost Budget. ARTICLE 5.ADDITIONAL SERVICES 17 5.1 Additional Services shall only be performed by Consultant following receipt of written authorization by the Project Administrator (which authorization must be obtained prior to commencement of any such additional work by Consultant).The written authorization shall contain a description of the Additional Services required;a lump sum to be negotiated at the time of the request for additional services or a fee (in accordance with the rates in Schedule "C" hereto),with a "Not to Exceed"amount;Reimbursable Expenses (if any)with a "Not to Exceed" amount;the amended Construction Cost Budget (if applicable);the time required to complete the Additional Services;and an amended Project Schedule (if applicable)."Not to Exceed"shall mean the maximum cumulative fees allowable (or,in the case of Reimbursable Expenses,the maximum cumulative expenses allowable),which the Consultant shall not exceed without further written authorization of the Project Administrator.The "Not to Exceed"amount is not a guaranteed maximum cost for the additional work requested (or,in the case of Reimbursables, for the expenses),and all costs applicable to same shall be verifiable through time sheets (and, for Reimbursables,expense reviews). 5.2 Additional Services include the following: 5.2.1 Appraisals:Investigation and creation of detailed appraisals and valuations of existing facilities,and surveys or inventories in connection with construction performed by City. 5.2.2.Unforeseen Conditions.Providing additional work relative to the Project which arises from subsequent circumstances and causes which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement (excluding conditions determined by all prior studies available to Consultant and excluding circumstances and causes resulting from error,omission,inadvertence,or negligence of Consultant). 5.2.3.City-Requested Revisions to Construction Documents:Making revisions to Construction Documents resulting in or from City-requested changes in Scope of Work involving new program elements,when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given by City and/or are due to causes beyond the control of Consultant. 5.2.4 Expert Witness:Except insofar as the Consultant is required by legal process or subpoena to appear and give testimony,preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any state or federal court action to which the Consultant is not a party in its own name,that is not instituted by the Consultant or in which the performance of the Consultant is not in issue. 5.2.5 Procurement:Assistance in connection with bid protests,re-bidding,or re- negotiating contracts (except for Contract Document revisions and re-bidding services required under Section 4.4 hereof,which shall be provided at no additional cost to City). 5.2.6.Models:Preparing professional perspectives,models or renderings in addition to those provided for in this Agreement except insofar as these are otherwise useful or necessary to the Consultant in the provision of Basic Services. 5.2.7.Threshold Inspection/Material Testing and Inspection:Providing threshold inspection services and material testing/special inspection services,provided that 18 Consultant,as part of the Basic Services,shall report on the progress the Work, including any defects and deficiencies that may be observed in the Work. 5.2.8 Pre-Design Surveys &Testing:Environmental investigations and site evaluations,provided,however,that surveys of the existing structure required to complete as-built documentation are not additional services. 5.2.9 Geotechnical engineering.Providing geotechnical engineering services or site surveys. 5.3 Additional services may be requested by the City using a Consultant Service Order (CSO).For each proposed Consultant Service Order,Consultant shall provide the City with a cost proposal on a lump sum or not-to-exceed basis,based on the fee schedule set forth in Schedule "C"hereto.Consultant Service Order shall be executed in accordance with Contract Approval Authority Procedure 03.02 or as amended.Any CSO not executed in accordance herewith shall be null and void. Except as specified herein,services that are required for completion of the Construction Documents shall be part of Consultant's Basic Services. Reimbursable Expenses and/or Contingency are allowance(s)set aside by the City and shall include actual expenditures (no markups allowed)made by the Consultant in the interest of the Project,provided such expenses are authorized in advance by the City.The Reimbursable Expenses and/or Contingency allowance(s),as specified herein,belongs to,and shall be controlled by the City (i.e.unused portions will be retained by the City and shall not be paid to Consultant). Notwithstanding the above,any Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized,in advance,in writing,by the City Manager or corresponding Department's Director.Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the corresponding Department's Director (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material required to support the amount invoiced,and as requested by the corresponding Department's Director).Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement."Only actual amounts incurred and paid (requiring proof of payment)by the Consultant shall be invoiced,without any markups and/or additions. ARTICLE 6.REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 6.1 Reimbursable Expenses must be authorized,in advance,in writing,by the Project Administrator.Invoices or vouchers for Reimbursable Expenses shall be submitted to the Project Administrator (along with any supporting receipts and other back-up material requested by the Project Administrator).Consultant shall certify as to each such invoice and/or voucher that the amounts and items claimed as reimbursable are "true and correct and in accordance with the Agreement."Reimbursable Expenses may include,but not be limited to,the following: •Cost of reproduction,courier,and postage and handling of drawings,plans, specifications,and other Project documents (excluding reproductions for the office use of the Consultant and its subconsultants,and courier,postage and handling costs between the Consultant and its subconsultants). 19 •Costs for reproduction and preparation of graphics for community workshops. •Permit fees required by City of Miami Beach regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over the Project (i.e.City permit fees). ARTICLE 7.COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 7 .1 Consultant's "Lump Sum"or "Not to Exceed"fee for provision of the Services,or portions thereof,as may be set forth and described in the Consultant Service Order attached hereto as Schedule "A",issued for a particular Project,shall be negotiated between the City and Consultant,and shall be set forth in the Consultant Service Order. 7.2 Payments for Services shall be made within forty-five (45)calendar days of receipt and approval of an acceptable invoice by the Project Administrator.Payments shall be made in proportion to the Services satisfactorily performed,so that the payments for Services never exceed the progress percentage noted in the Consultant's Progress Schedule (to be submitted with each invoice).No mark-up shall be allowed on subcontracted work.In addition to the invoice,the Consultant shall,for Hourly Rate authorizations,submit a progress report giving the percentage of completion of the Project and the total estimated fee to completion. 7.3 Approved Additional Services shall be compensated in accordance with the hourly billing rates set forth in Schedule "B,"attached hereto.Any request for payment of Additional Services shall be included with a Consultant payment request.No mark-up shall be allowed on Additional Services (whether sub-contracted or not). 7.4 Approved Reimbursable Expenses shall be paid in accordance with Article 6 hereto,up to the "Not to Exceed"Reimbursable allowance amount set forth in Schedule A-1 or Consultant Service Order (as applicable).Any request for payment of Reimbursable Expenses shall also be included with Consultant's payment request.No mark-up shall be allowed on Reimbursable Expenses. 7.5 ESCALATION:The initial hourly rates set forth in Schedule B shall remain constant for the Initial Term of the agreement.Ninety (90)days prior to expiration of the Initial Term,the City Manager may consider an adjustment to the preceding year's unit costs for the subsequent year.Any such adjustments,if any,shall be based on a corresponding increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers;U.S.City average (1982-84=100),as established by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI"),or material adjustments to the scope or requirements of the RFQ by the City,including (but not limited to)living wage increases,provided,however,that in no event shall any annual increase exceed three percent (3%).In the event that the City Manager determines that the requested increase is unsubstantiated,the Consultant agrees to perform all duties at the current cost terms. 7.6 No retainage shall be made from the Consultant's compensation on account of sums withheld by the City on payments to Consultant. 7.7 METHOD OF BILLING AND PAYMENT.Consultant shall invoice the Project 20 Administrator in a timely manner,but no more than once on a monthly basis,per project. Invoices shall identify/include the nature and extent of the work performed;the total hours of work performed by employee category;and the respective hourly billing rate associated therewith.In the event sub-consultant work is used,the percentage of completion shall be identified.Invoices shall also itemize and summarize any Additional Services and/or Reimbursable Expenses.A copy of the written approval of the Project Administrator for the requested Additional Service(s)or Reimbursable Expense(s)shall accompany the invoice. Invoices shall be submitted to the City at the following address: Accounts Payable:payables@miamibeachfl.gov 7.7.1 If requested,Consultant shall provide back-up for past and current invoices that records hours for all work (by employee category),and cost itemizations for Reimbursable Expenses (by category). ARTICLE 8.CONSULTANT'S ACCOUNTING AND OTHER RECORDS 8.1 All books,records (whether financial or otherwise),correspondence,technical documents,and any other records or documents related to the Services and/or Project will be available for examination and audit by the City Manager,or his/her authorized representatives, at Consultant's office (at the address designated in Article 15 [Notices"]),during customary business hours.All such records shall be kept at least for a period of three (3)years after Consultant's completion of the Services.Incomplete or incorrect entries in such records and accounts relating personnel services and expenses may be grounds for City's disallowance of any fees or expenses based upon such entries.Consultant shall also bind its subconsultants to the requirements of this Article and ensure compliance therewith ARTICLE 9.OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS 9.1 All notes,correspondence,documents,plans and specifications,designs,drawings, renderings,calculations,specifications,models,photographs,reports,surveys,investigations, and any other documents (whether completed or partially completed)and copyrights thereto for Services performed or produced in the performance of this Agreement,or related to the Project, whether in its native electronic form,paper or other hard copy medium or in electronic medium, except with respect to copyrighted standard details and designs owned by the Consultant or owned by a third party and licensed to the Consultant for use and reproduction,shall become the property of the City.Consultant shall deliver all such documents to the Project Administrator in their native electronic form,as required in the Consultant Service Order within thirty (30)days of completion of the Services (or within thirty (30)days of expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement as the case may be).However,the City may grant an exclusive license of the copyright to the Consultant for reusing and reproducing copyrighted materials or portions thereof as authorized by the City Manager in advance and in writing,In addition,the Consultant shall not disclose,release,or make available any document to any third party without prior written approval from the City Manager.The Consultant shall warrant to the City that it has been granted a license to use and reproduce any standard details and designs owned by a third party and used or reproduced by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to exclude any document from Chapter 119,Florida Statutes. 21 9.2 The Consultant is permitted to reproduce copyrighted material described above subject to prior written approval of the City Manager. 9.3 At the City's option,the Consultant may be authorized,as an Additional Service,to adapt copyrighted material for additional or other work for the City;however,payment to the Consultant for such adaptations will be limited to an amount not greater than 50%of the original fee earned to adapt the original copyrighted material to a new site. 9.4 The City shall have the right to modify the Project or any components thereof without permission from the Consultant or without any additional compensation to the Consultant.The Consultant shall be released from any liability resulting from such modification. 9.5 The Consultant shall bind all subconsultants to the Agreement requirements for re-use of plans and specifications. ARTICLE 10.TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 10.1 TERMINATION FOR LACK OF FUNDS:The City is a governmental entity and is subject to the appropriation of funds by its legislative body in an amount sufficient to allow continuation of its performance in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event there is a lack of adequate funding either for the Services or the Project (or both), the City may terminate this Agreement without further liability to the City. 10.2 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE:The City,through the City Manager,may terminate this Agreement for cause,upon written notice to Consultant,in the event that the Consultant (1) violates any provision of this Agreement or performs same in bad faith;(2)unreasonably delays the performance of the Services or any portion thereof;or (3)does not perform the Services or any portion thereof in a timely and satisfactory manner.In the case of termination for cause by the City,the Consultant shall first be granted a thirty (30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of the initial written notice of default from the City). 10.2.1 In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause by the City,the City,at its sole option and discretion,may take over the remaining Services and complete them by contracting with another consultant(s),or otherwise.The Consultant shall be liable to the City for any additional cost(s)incurred by the City due to such termination."Additional Cost"is defined as the difference between the actual cost of completion of the Services, and the cost of completion of such Services had the Agreement not been terminated. 10.2.2 In the event of termination for cause by the City,the City shall only be obligated to pay Consultant for those Services satisfactorily performed and accepted prior to the date of termination (as such date is set forth in,or can be calculated from,the City's initial written default notice).Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant to this subsection 10.2.2,the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.2.3 As a condition precedent to release of any payment which may be due to Consultant under subsection 10.2.2,the Consultant shall promptly assemble and deliver to the Project Administrator any and all Project documents prepared (or caused to be prepared)by Consultant (including,without limitation,those referenced in subsection 9.1 22 hereof).The City shall not be responsible for any cost incurred by Consultant for assembly,copy,and/or delivery of Project documents pursuant to this subsection. 10.3 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE:In addition to the City's right to terminate for cause,the City through the City Manager,may also terminate this Agreement,upon fourteen (14)days prior written notice to Consultant,for convenience,without cause,and without penalty, when (in its sole discretion)it deems such termination to be in the best interest of the City.In the event the City terminates the Agreement for convenience,Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the termination date (as set forth in the City's written notice),and for Consultant's costs in assembly and delivery to the Project Administrator of the Project documents (referenced in subsection 10.2.3 above).Upon payment of any amount which may be due to Consultant pursuant this subsection 10.3,the City shall have no further liability to Consultant. 10.4 TERMINATION BY CONSULT ANT:The Consultant may only terminate this Agreement for cause,upon thirty (30)days prior written notice to the City,in the event that the City willfully violates any provisions of this Agreement or unreasonably delays payment of the Services or any portion thereof.In the event of a termination for cause by Consultant,the City shall pay Consultant for any Services satisfactorily performed and accepted up to the date of termination; provided,however,that the City shall first be granted a thirty (30)day cure period (commencing upon receipt of Consultant's initial written notice). 10.4.1 The Consultant shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for convenience. 10.5 IMPLEMENTATION OF TERMINATION:In the event of termination (whether for cause or for convenience),the Consultant shall immediately,upon receipt of the City's written notice of termination:(1)stop the performance of Services;(2)place no further orders or issue any other subcontracts,except for those which may have already been approved,in writing,by the Project Administrator;(3)terminate all existing orders and subcontracts;and (4)promptly assemble all Project documents (for delivery to the Project Administrator). ARTICLE 11.INSURANCE Insurance requirements will be determined on a project by project basis at the time of Consultant Service Order (CSO). 11.1 The maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the Agreement and failure to maintain or renew coverage may be treated as a material breach of the Agreement,which could result in withholding of payments or termination of the Agreement. 11.2 Additional Insured -City of Miami Beach must be included by endorsement as an additional insured with respect to all liability policies (except Professional Liability and Workers' Compensation)arising out of work or operations performed on behalf of the Consultant including materials,parts,or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned,leased,hired or borrowed in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance. 11.3 Notice of Cancellation -Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be cancelled,except with notice to the City of Miami Beach c/o EXIGIS Insurance Compliance Services. 23 11.4 Waiver of Subrogation -Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect the waiver of subrogation on the coverages required.However,this provision applies regardless of whether the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 11.5 Acceptability of Insurers -Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current AM. Best rating of A:VII or higher.If not rated,exceptions may be made for members of the Florida Insurance Funds (i.e.FWCIGA,FAJUA).Carriers may also be considered if they are licensed and authorized to do insurance business in the State of Florida. 11.6 Verification of Coverage -Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements,or copies of the applicable insurance language,effecting coverage required by this contract.All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.However,failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them.The City reserves the right to require complete,certified copies of all required insurance policies,including endorsements,required by these specifications,at any time. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST REA D: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH c/o EXIGIS Insurance Compliance Services P.O.Box 4668 -ECM #35050 New York,NY 10163-4668 Kindly submit all certificates of insurance,endorsements,exemption letters to our servicing agent,EXIGIS,at: Certificates-miamibeach@riskworks.com 11.7 Special Risks or Circumstances -The City of Miami Beach reserves the right to modify these requirements,including limits,based on the nature of the risk,prior experience, insurer,coverage,or other special circumstances. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the vendor of his liability and obligation under this section or under any other section of this agreement. ARTICLE 12.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 12.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Section 725.08,Florida Statutes,the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers,employees,agents,and instrumentalities, from liabilities,damages,losses,and costs,including,but not limited to,reasonable attorneys' fees,to the extent caused by the negligence,recklessness,or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith and shall investigate and defend all claims,suits,or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City,where applicable,including appellate proceedings,and shall pay all costs,judgments,and attorney's 24 fees which may issue thereon.Consultant expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Agreement or otherwise provided by Consultant shall in no way limit its responsibility to indemnify,keep,and save harmless and defend the City or its officers,employees,agents,and instrumentalities as herein provided. 12.2 The Consultant agrees and recognizes that the City shall not be held liable or responsible for any claims which may result from any negligent,reckless,or intentionally wrongful actions,errors or omissions of the Consultant in which the City participated either through review or concurrence of the Consultant's actions.In reviewing,approving or rejecting any,submissions by the Consultant,or other acts of the Consultant,the City in no way assumes or shares any responsibility or liability of the Consultant (including,without limitation its subconsultants and/or any registered professionals (architects and/or engineers)under this Agreement). ARTICLE 13.ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 13.1 ERRORS AND OMISSIONS:It is specifically agreed that any construction changes categorized by the City as caused by an error,an omission,or any combination thereof in the Consultant's performance of the Services will constitute an additional cost to the City that would not have been incurred without the error.The damages to the City for errors,omissions or any combinations thereof shall be calculated as the total cost of any damages or incremental costs to the City resulting out of the errors or omissions by the Consultant,including,without limitation,the direct,indirect and/or consequential damages resulting from the Consultant's errors and/or omissions or any combination thereof. Damages shall include delay damages caused by the error,omission,or any combination thereof.Should the Consultant disagree that all or part of such damages are the result of errors,omissions,or any combination thereof,the Consultant may appeal this determination,in writing,to the Project Administrator.The Project Administrator's decision on all claims, questions and disputes shall be final,conclusive,and binding upon the parties hereto unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or unreasonable.In the event that the Consultant does not agree with the decision of the Project Administrator,the Consultant shall present any such objections,in writing,to the City Manager.The Project Administrator and the Consultant shall abide by the decision of the City Manager.This paragraph does not constitute a waiver of any party's right to proceed in a court of competent jurisdiction after the above administrative remedies have been exhausted. ARTICLE 14.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The City desires to enter into this Agreement only if in so doing the City can place a limit on its liability for any cause of action for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement,so that its liability for any such breach never exceeds the "not to exceed"amount of the fee paid to Consultant under this Agreement,less any amount(s)actually paid to Consultant hereunder.Consultant hereby expresses its willingness to enter into this Agreement,with Consultant's recovery from the City for any damages for action for breach of contract to be limited to Consultant's "not to exceed"fee under this Agreement,less any amount(s)actually paid by the City to the Consultant hereunder. Accordingly,and notwithstanding any other term or condition of this Agreement,Consultant 25 hereby agrees that the City shall not be liable to Consultant for money damages due to an alleged breach by the City of this Agreement,in an amount in excess of the "not to exceed amount"of Consultant's fees under this Agreement,which amount shall be reduced by any amount(s)actually paid by the City to Consultant hereunder. Nothing contained in this subsection,or elsewhere in this Agreement,is in any way intended to be a waiver of the limitation placed upon City's liability,as set forth in Section 768.28,Florida Statutes. ARTICLE 15.NOTICE Until changed by notice in writing,all such notices and communications shall be addressed as follows: All written notices given to City by Consultant shall be addressed to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attn:Alina Hudak,City Manager Email:alinahudak@miamibeachfl.gov With a copy to: City Manager's Office City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Attn:Eric Carpenter,Assistant City Manager Email:ericcarpenter@miamibeachfl.gov All written notices given to the Consultant from the City shall be addressed to: All notices mailed electronically to either party shall be deemed to be sufficiently transmitted. ARTICLE 16.CONSULTANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA PUBLIC RECORDS LAW 16.1 Consultant shall comply with Florida Public Records law under Chapter 119,Florida Statutes,as may be amended from time to time. 16.2 The term "public records"shall have the meaning set forth in Section 119.011 (12),which 26 means all documents,papers,letters,maps,books,tapes,photographs,films,sound recordings,data processing software,or other material,regardless of the physical form, characteristics,or means of transmission,made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business of the City. 16.3 Pursuant to Section 119.0701 of the Florida Statutes,if the Consultant meets the definition of "Consultant"as defined in Section 119.0701(1 )(a),the Consultant shall: (a)Keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service; (b)Upon request from the City's custodian of public records,provide the City with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Chapter 119,Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law; (c)Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed,except as authorized by law,for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the Agreement if the Consultant does not transfer the records to the City; (d)Upon completion of the Agreement,transfer,at no cost to the City,all public records in possession of the Consultant or keep and maintain public records required by the City to perform the service.If the Consultant transfers all public records to the City upon completion of the Agreement,the Consultant shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements.If the Consultant keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Agreement,the Consultant shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records.All records stored electronically must be provided to the City,upon request from the City's custodian of public records,in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the City. 16.4 REQUEST FOR RECORDS;NONCOMPLIANCE. 16.4.1 A request to inspect or copy public records relating to the City's contract for services must be made directly to the City.If the City does not possess the requested records,the City shall immediately notify the Consultant of the request,and the Consultant must provide the records to the City or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time. 16.4.2 Consultant's failure to comply with the City's request for records shall constitute a breach of this Agreement,and the City,at its sole discretion,may:(1) unilaterally terminate the Agreement;(2)avail itself of the remedies set forth under the Agreement;and/or (3)avail itself of any available remedies at law or in equity. 16.4.3 A Consultant who fails to provide the public records to the City within a reasonable time may be subject to penalties under s.119.10. 16.5 CIVIL ACTION. 16.5.1 If a civil action is filed against a Consultant to compel production of public records relating to the City's contract for services,the court shall assess and award against the Consultant the reasonable costs of enforcement,including reasonable attorneys'fees,if: 27 (a)The court determines that the Consultant unlawfully refused to comply with the public records request within a reasonable time;and (b)At least 8 business days before filing the action,the plaintiff provided written notice of the public records request,including a statement that the Consultant has not complied with the request,to the City and to the Consultant. 16.5.2 A notice complies with subparagraph (16.5.1)(b)if it is sent to the City's custodian of public records and to the Consultant at the Consultant's address listed on its contract with the City or to the Consultant's registered agent.Such notices must be sent by common carrier delivery service or by registered,Global Express Guaranteed,or certified mail,with postage or shipping paid by the sender and with evidence of delivery,which may be in an electronic format. 16.5.3 A Consultant who complies with a public records request within 8 business days after the notice is sent is not liable for the reasonable costs of enforcement. 16.6 IF THE CONSUL TANT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119,FLORIDA STATUTES,TO THE CONSULTANT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT,CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ATTENTION:RA FAEL E.GRANADO,CITY CLERK 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH,FLORIDA 33139 E-MAIL:RAFAELGRA NADO@MIAMIBEACHFL.GOV PHONE:305-673-7411 ARTICLE 17.INSPECTOR GENERA L AUDIT RIGHTS 17.1 Pursuant to Section 2-256 of the Code of the City of Miami Beach,the City has established the Office of the Inspector General which may,on a random basis,perform reviews, audits,inspections,and investigations on all City contracts,throughout the duration of said contracts.This random audit is separate and distinct from any other audit performed by or on behalf of the City. 17.2 The Office of the Inspector General is authorized to investigate City affairs and empowered to review past,present and proposed City programs,accounts,records,contracts and transactions.In addition,the Inspector General has the power to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths,require the production of witnesses and monitor City projects and programs. Monitoring of an existing City project or program may include a report concerning whether the project is on time,within budget and in conformance with the contract documents and applicable 28 law.The Inspector General shall have the power to audit,investigate,monitor,oversee,inspect and review operations,activities,performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design,bid specifications,(bid/proposal)submittals,activities of the Consultant,its officers,agents and employees,lobbyists,City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption.Pursuant to Section 2-378 of the City Code,the City is allocating a percentage of its overall annual contract expenditures to fund the activities and operations of the Office of Inspector General. 17.3 Upon ten (10)days written notice to the Consultant,the Consultant shall make all requested records and documents available to the Inspector General for inspection and copying.The Inspector General is empowered to retain the services of independent private sector auditors to audit,investigate,monitor,oversee,inspect and review operations activities, performance and procurement process including but not limited to project design,bid specifications,(bid/proposal)submittals,activities of the Consultant its officers,agents and employees,lobbyists,City staff and elected officials to ensure compliance with the contract documents and to detect fraud and corruption. 17.4 The Inspector General shall have the right to inspect and copy all documents and records in the Consultant's possession,custody or control which in the Inspector General's sole judgment,pertain to performance of the contract,including,but not limited to original estimate files,change order estimate files,worksheets,proposals and agreements from and with successful subconsultants and suppliers,all project-related correspondence,memoranda, instructions,financial documents,construction documents,(bid/proposal)and contract documents,back-change documents,all documents and records which involve cash,trade or volume discounts,insurance proceeds,rebates,or dividends received,payroll and personnel records and supporting documentation for the aforesaid documents and records. 17.5 The Consultant shall make available at its office at all reasonable times the records, materials,and other evidence regarding the acquisition (bid preparation)and performance of this Agreement,for examination,audit,or reproduction,until three (3)years after final payment under this Agreement or for any longer period required by statute or by other clauses of this Agreement.In addition: (a)If this Agreement is completely or partially terminated,the Consultant shall make available records relating to the work terminated until three (3)years after any resulting final termination settlement;and (b)The Consultant shall make available records relating to appeals or to litigation or the settlement of claims arising under or relating to this Agreement until such appeals, litigation,or claims are finally resolved. 17.6 The provisions in this section shall apply to the Consultant,its officers,agents, employees,subconsultants and suppliers.The Consultant shall incorporate the provisions in this section in all subcontracts and all other agreements executed by the Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 17.7 Nothing in this section shall impair any independent right to the City to conduct audits or investigative activities.The provisions of this section are neither intended nor shall they be construed to impose any liability on the City by the Consultant or third parties. 29 ARTICLE 18.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 18.1 VENUE AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL:This Agreement shall be governed by,and construed in accordance with,the laws of the State of Florida,both substantive and remedial, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.The exclusive venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Miami-Dade County,Florida,if in state court,and the U.S.District Court,Southern District of Florida,in federal court.BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT AND CITY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO,OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 18.2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT GOALS:Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment for work under this Agreement because of race,color,national origin,religion,sex,gender identity,sexual orientation, disability,marital or familial status,or age,and will take affirmative steps to ensure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during employment without regard to race, color,national origin,religion,sex,gender identity,sexual orientation,disability,marital or familial status,or age. 18.3 PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES ACT:In accordance with the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287 .133,Florida Statutes),a person or affiliate who is a consultant,who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to the City,may not submit a bid on a contract with the City for the construction or repair of a public building or public work,may not bid on leases of real property to the City,may not be awarded or perform work as a Consultant, supplier,subconsultant,or subconsultant under a contract with the City,and may not transact business with the City in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017,Florida Statutes,for Category Two,for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.For violation of this subsection by Consultant,City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without any liability to City,and pursue debarment of Consultant 18.4 NO CONTINGENT FEE:Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant,to solicit or secure this Agreement,and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person,company, corporation,individual or firm,other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee,commission,percentage,gift,or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.For the breach or violation of this subsection,City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement,without any liability or,at its discretion,to deduct from the contract price (or otherwise recover)the full amount of such fee,commission, percentage,gift,or consideration. 18.5 LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 18.5.1 The Consultant shall,during the Term of this Agreement,be governed by all Applicable Laws which may have a bearing on the Services involved in the Project. 30 18.5.2 Project Documents.In accordance with Section 119.071 (3)(b)(2),Florida Statutes,entitled "General exemptions from inspecting or copying public records,"all building plans,blueprints,schematic drawings,and diagrams, including draft,preliminary,and final formats,are exempt from the provisions of Section 119.07(1 ),Florida Statutes (inspection and copying of public records), and s.24(a),Article I of the State Constitution.Information made exempt by this paragraph,with prior written approval from the City Manager,may be disclosed to another entity to perform its duties and responsibilities;to a licensed architect, engineer,or Consultant who is performing work on or related to the Project;or upon a showing of good cause before a court of competent jurisdiction.The entities or persons receiving such information shall maintain the exempt status of the information. 18.5.2.1 In addition to the requirements in this subsection 18.5.2,the Consultant agrees to abide by all applicable Federal,State,and City procedures,as may be amended from time to time,by which the documents are handled,copied,and distributed which may include, but is not limited to,each employee of Consultant and subconsultants that will be involved in the Project being required to sign an agreement stating that they will not copy,duplicate,or distribute the documents unless authorized by the City Manager,in writing. 18.5.2.2 The Consultant and its subconsultants agree in writing that the Project documents are to be kept and maintained in a secure location. 18.5.2.3 Each set of the Project documents are to be numbered and the whereabouts of the documents shall be tracked at all times. 18.5.2.4 A log is developed to track each set of documents logging in the date, time,and name of the individual(s)that work on or view the documents. 18.5.3 E-Verify 18.5.3.1 Consultant shall comply with Section 448.095,Florida Statutes, "Employment Eligibility"("E-Verify Statute"),as may be amended from time to time.Pursuant to the E-Verify Statute,commencing on January 1,2021,Consultant shall register with and use the E-Verify system to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees during the Term of the Agreement.Additionally, Consultant shall expressly require any subconsultant performing work or providing services pursuant to the Agreement to likewise utilize the U.S.Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subconsultant during the contract Term.If Consultant enters into a contract with an approved subconsultant,the subconsultant must provide the Consultant with an affidavit stating that the subconsultant does not employ,contract with,or subcontract with an unauthorized alien. Consultant shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of the Agreement or such other extended period as may be required 31 under this Agreement. 18.5.3.2 TERMINATION RIGHTS. 18.5.3.2.1 If the City has a good faith belief that Consultant has knowingly violated Section 448.09(1 ),Florida Statutes,the City shall terminate this Agreement with Consultant for cause,and the City shall thereafter have or owe no further obligation or liability to Consultant. 18.3.5.2.2 If the City has a good faith belief that a subconsultant has knowingly violated the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.1 but the Consultant otherwise complied with such subsection,the City will promptly notify the Consultant and order the Consultant to immediately terminate the Agreement with the subconsultant. Consultant's failure to terminate a subconsultant shall be an event of default under this Agreement,entitling City to terminate the Consultant's contract for cause. 18.5.3.2.3 A contract terminated under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 or 18.5.3.2.2 is not in breach of contract and may not be considered as such. 18.5.3.2.4 The City or Consultant or a subconsultant may file an action with the Circuit or County Court to challenge a termination under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 or 18.5.3.2.2 no later than 20 calendar days after the date on which the contract was terminated. 18.5.3.2.5 If the City terminates the Agreement with Consultant under the foregoing Subsection 18.5.3.2.1 Consultant may not be awarded a public contract for at least 1 year after the date of termination of this Agreement. 18.5.3.2.6 Consultant is liable for any additional costs incurred by the City as a result of the termination of this Agreement under this Section 18.5.3. 18.6 FO RCE MAJEURE: 18.6.1 A "Force Majeure"event is an event that (i)in fact causes a delay in the performance of the Consultant or the City's obligations under the Agreement,and (ii)is beyond the reasonable control of such party unable to perform the obligation,and (iii)is not due to an intentional act,error,omission,or negligence of such party,and (iv)could not have reasonably been foreseen and prepared for by such party at any time prior to the occurrence of the event.Subject to the foregoing criteria,Force Majeure may include events such as war,civil insurrection,riot,fires,epidemics,pandemics,terrorism, sabotage,explosions,embargo restrictions,quarantine restrictions,transportation accidents,strikes,strong hurricanes or tornadoes,earthquakes,or other acts of God which prevent performance.Force Majeure shall not include technological impossibility, inclement weather,or failure to secure any of the required permits pursuant to the Agreement. 32 18.6.2 If the City or Consultant's performance of its contractual obligations is prevented or delayed by an event believed by to be Force Majeure,such party shall immediately upon learning of the occurrence of the event or of the commencement of any such delay, but in no case within fifteen (15)business days thereof,provide notice of (i)of the occurrence of event of Force Majeure,(ii)of the nature of the event and the cause thereof,(iii)of the anticipated impact on the Agreement,(iv)of the anticipated period of the delay,and (v)of what course of action such party plans to take in order to mitigate the detrimental effects of the event.The timely delivery of the notice of the occurrence of a Force Majeure event is a condition precedent to allowance of any relief pursuant to this section;however,receipt of such notice shall not constitute acceptance that the event claimed to be a Force Majeure event is in fact Force Majeure,and the burden of proof of the occurrence of a Force Majeure event shall be on the requesting party. 18.6.3 No party hereto shall be liable for its failure to carry out its obligations under the Agreement during a period when such party is rendered unable,in whole or in part,by Force Majeure to carry out such obligations.The suspension of any of the obligations under this Agreement due to a Force Majeure event shall be of no greater scope and no longer duration than is required.The party shall use its reasonable best efforts to continue to perform its obligations hereunder to the extent such obligations are not affected or are only partially affected by the Force Majeure event,and to correct or cure the event or condition excusing performance and otherwise to remedy its inability to perform to the extent its inability to perform is the direct result of the Force Majeure event with all reasonable dispatch. 18.6.4 Obligations pursuant to the Agreement that arose before the occurrence of a Force Majeure event causing the suspension of performance shall not be excused as a result of such occurrence unless such occurrence makes such performance not reasonably possible.The obligation to pay money in a timely manner for obligations and liabilities which matured prior to the occurrence of a Force Majeure event shall not be subject to the Force Majeure provisions. 18.6.5 Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary herein,in the event of a Force Majeure occurrence,the City may,at the sole discretion of the City Manager, suspend the City's payment obligations under the Agreement,and may take such action without regard to the notice requirements herein.Additionally,in the event that an event of Force Majeure delays a party's performance under the Agreement for a time period greater than thirty (30)days,the City may,at the sole discretion of the City Manager, terminate the Agreement on a given date,by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination.If the Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section,Consultant shall be paid for any Services satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination;following which the City shall be discharged from any and all liabilities,duties,and terms arising out of,or by virtue of,this Agreement.In no event will any condition of Force Majeure extend this Agreement beyond its stated term.Any time extension shall be subject to mutual agreement and shall not be cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation,unless Additional Services are required and approved pursuant to Article 5 hereof. 18.7 CORRECTIONS TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:If applicable to the performance of Consultant's Services,the Consultant shall prepare,without added compensation,all necessary supplemental documents to correct errors,omissions,and/or ambiguities which may exist in the 33 Contract Documents prepared by Consultant,including documents prepared by its subconsultants.Compliance with this subsection shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from any liability resulting from any such errors,omissions,and/or ambiguities in the Contract Documents and other documents or Services related thereto. 18.8 ASSIGNMENT:The Consultant shall not assign,transfer or convey this Agreement to any other person,firm,association or corporation,in whole or in part,without the prior written consent of the City Commission,which consent,if given at all,shall be at the Commission's sole option and discretion.However,the Consultant will be permitted to cause portions of the Services to be performed by subconsultants,subject to the prior written approval of the City Manager. 18.9 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:The Consultant and the City each binds himself/herself,his/her partners,successors,legal representatives and assigns to the other party of the Agreement and to the partners,successors,legal representatives,and assigns of such party in respect to all covenants of this Agreement.The Consultant shall afford the City (through the City Commission)the opportunity to approve or reject all proposed assignees, successors or other changes in the ownership structure and composition of the Consultant. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. 18.9 PROVISION OF ITEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SERVICES:In the performance of the Services prescribed herein,it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide all salaries,wages,materials,equipment,subconsultants,and other purchased services,etc.,as necessary to complete said Services. 18.10 INTENT OF AGREEMENT: 18.10.1 The intent of the Agreement is for the Consultant to provide all necessary items for the proper completion of the Services.The Consultant shall perform,as Basic Services,such incidental work which may not be specifically referenced,as necessary to complete the Project. 18.10.2 This Agreement is for the benefit of the parties only and it does not grant rights to a third party beneficiary,to any person,nor does it authorize anyone not a party to the Agreement to maintain a suit for personal injuries,professional liability,or property damage pursuant to the terms or provisions of the Agreement. 18.10.3 No acceptance,order,payment,or certificate of or by the City,or its employees or agents shall either stop the City from asserting any rights or operate as a waiver of any provisions hereof or of any power or right herein reserved to the City or of any rights to damages herein provided. 18.10.4 This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence,conversations,agreements,or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein;and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements,or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document.Accordingly,the parties agree that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements whether oral or written.It is further agreed that no modification,amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless memorialized in written 34 document approval and executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith. [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 35 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have hereunto caused these presents to be signed in their names by their duly authorized officers and principals,attested by their respective witnesses and City Clerk on the day and year first hereinabove written. Attest RAFAEL E.GRANADO,CITY CLERK Date _ CONSULTANT: Signature/President Print Date 36 CITY OF MIAMI BEACH: DAN GELBER,MAYOR SCHEDULE A CONSULTANT SERVICE ORDER Service Order No. TO:[Consultant] for services described herein PROJECT NAME:_ DATE: Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Miami Beach and [Consultant],for [Name of Project]RFQ-2020-096-ND,you are directed to provide the following services: SCOPE OF SERVICES: Per attached proposal dated ,(o be considered part of this Agreement. Estimated calendar days to complete this work: Original Service Order Amount: Total From Previous Additional Service Orders: Fee for this Service Order is Lump Sum/Not to Exceed amount of: Total Agreement to Date: $ $ $ $ Days Dept.Director Assistant City Manager City Manager Date Date Date 37 Consultant Date SCHEDULE A-1 CONSULTANT COMPENSATION Schedule of Payments Planning Serv ices Design Serv ices* Bidding and Award Serv ices Construction Administration Reim bursable Allowance*** $XXXXXXXX $XXXXXXXX $XXXXXXXX $XXXXXXXX $XXXXXXXX Note*:These serv ices will be paid lump sum based on percentage complete of each phase as identified in the individual tasks. Note :Construction Adm inistration will be paid on a monthly basis upon comm encement of construction. In the event that,through no fault of the Consultant,Construction Administration serv ices are required to be extended,which extension shall be subject to prior City approval,and what shall be at the City's sole discretion,the Consultant agrees to extend said serv ices for $XXXXXX ,per m onth,for the duration required to complete the Project. Note***:The Reim bursable Allowance belongs to the City and must be approved in w riting,in advance,by the Project Adm inistrator.Unused portions will not be paid to the Consultant. 38 SCHEDULE B CONSUL TANT HOURLY RATE SCHEDULES 39 SCHEDULE C APPROVED SUBCONSUL TANTS 40 MIAMI BEACH APPENDIX C MIAMI BEACH Insurance Requirements 2024-234-ND EN GINEERING SERVICES FO R SEWALLS AND LIVING SHO RELINES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3d Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 MIAMI BEACH INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The consultant shall maintain the below required insurance in effect prior to awarding the contract and for the duration of the contract.The maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract and failure to maintain or renew coverage may be treated as a material breach of the contract,which could result in withholding of payments or termination of the contract. A.Workers'Compensation Insurance for all employees of the Contractor as required by Florida Statute Chapter 440 and Employer Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.Should the Contractor be exempt from this Statute,the Contractor and each employee shall hold the City harmless from any injury incurred during performance of the Contract. The exempt contractor shall also submit (i)a written statement detailing the number of employees and that they are not required to carry Workers' Compensation insurance and do not anticipate hiring any additional employees during the term of this contract or (ii)a copy of a Certificate of Exemption. B.Commercial General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis,including products and completed operations,property damage,bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence,and $2,000,000 general aggregate. C.Automobile Liability Insurance covering any automobile,if consultant has no owned automobiles,then coverage for hired and non-owned automobiles,with limit no less than $1,000,000 combined per accident for bodily injury and property damage. D.Professional Liability (Errors &Omissions)Insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession,with limit no less than $1,000,000. Additional Insured -City of Miami Beach must be included by endorsement as an additional insured with respect to all liability policies (except Professional Liability and Workers' Compensation)arising out of work or operations performed on behalf of the contractor including materials,parts,or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned,leased,hired or borrowed in the form of an endorsement to the contractor's insurance. Notice of Cancellation -Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be cancelled,except with notice to the City of Miami Beach c/o EXIGIS Insurance Compliance Services. Waiver of Subrogation -Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect the waiver of subrogation on the coverages required.However,this provision applies regardless of whether the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. Acceptability of Insurers -Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best rating of A:VII or higher.If not rated,exceptions may be made for members of the Florida Insurance MIAMI BEACH Funds (i.e.FWCIGA,FAJUA).Carriers may also be considered if they are licensed and authorized to do insurance business in the State of Florida. Verification of Coverage -Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements,or copies of the applicable insurance language,effecting coverage required by this contract.All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.However,failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor's obligation to provide them.The City reserves the right to require complete,certified copies of all required insurance policies,including endorsements,required by these specifications,at any time. CERTIFICATE HOLDER MUST READ: City of Miami Beach c/o Exigis Insurance Compliance Services P.O.Box 947 Murrieta,CA 92564 Kindly submit all certificates of insurance,endorsements,exemption letters to our servicing agent, EXIGIS,at: Certificates-miamibeach@riskyorks.com Special Risks or Circumstances -The City of Miami Beach reserves the right to modify these requirements,including limits,based on the nature of the risk,prior experience,insurer,coverage, or other special circumstances. Compliance with the foregoing requirements shall not relieve the consultant of his liability and obligation under this section or under any other section of this agreement. Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank MIAMI BEACH A PPENDIX D M AMI BEACH Seawall and Shoreline Prioritization List 2024-234-ND EN G INEERING SERVICES FO R SEWALLS AND LIV ING SHORELINES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3d Floor M iami Beach,Florida 33139 MIAMI BEACH SEAWALL PRIORITIZATION LIST Tatum Waterway Pedestrian Bridge Palm Island Park 44h street end 436 St Street End W 428 St Street End Bayside Ln Bayside Ln Street End Ray St Street End Bonita Dr Street End South 7251 Collins Ave 7600 Tatum Waterway Dr Fairway Dr Street End Rue Granville Street End North N Biscayne Point Rd Street End West 4119 Indian Creek Dr Tatum Waterway Pedestrian Bridge Bay Dr Street End 1 Di Lido Ter Street End West Rue Versailles Street End Noth 6860 Indian Creek Dr Alton Rd To Michigan Ave 17 St To West Ave West Ave To Alton Rd West Hagen St Street End Mitchell St Street End Henedon Ave Street End North Vardon St Street End Wayne Ave Street End Jones St Street End Henedon Ave Street End South Normandy Dr Street End 538 West Ave 25-Street End Rue Notre Dame Street End South W 56/St Street End 800 S Pointe Dr Pine Tree Dr And W 63 St 798 S Pointe Dr Trouville Esplanade Street End South Sarazen St Street End S Shore Dr Street End Sunset Lake Park 24-Street End Rue Granville Street End South W 59/St Street End Flamingo Dr Street End Rue Versailles Street End South 390 Alton Rd Rue Bordeaux Street End 50 S Washington Ave 32-Street End N Meridian Ave To Prairie Ave South Point Park Pine Tree Park Washington Ave Street End Liberty Ave Street End SHORELINE PRIORITIZATION LIST Bayside Lane Julia Tuttle Causeway and Alton Road South West 40th Street Parking Lot Pine Tree Park Indian Beach Park 6860 Indian Creek Drive Park View Island Canal Beach View Park and Fire Station #3 North Bay Road -North End South Pointe Park MIAMI BEACH APPENDIX E MIA M BEACH Citywide Procedure No. 1 6.06 Procurement Requirements for Federally Funded Grants and Projects 2024-234-ND EN GINEERING SERVICES FOR SEWALLS AND LIVING SHO RELINES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3d Floor Miam i Beach,Florida 33139 DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FD EF-4660-B6C5-14 708A233969 DATE ISSUED:Page:1 SEQUENCE MIA NAPE A I MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT I.PURPOSE.The purpose of this procedure is to comply with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200) adopted by the United States Office of Management and Budget.Compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 is a requirement of federally funded grants.This Procedure includes the following exhibit: •Exhibit A-Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards II.APPLICABILITY.This procedure is applicable to the expenditure of any funds,typically generated through federal grants or reimbursements,to which the 2 CFR,Part 200,requirements are applicable.The requirements stated herein shall be strictly adhered to by all employees,regardless of department,who are involved in the procurement of goods and services to which the aforementioned regulations are applicable, including but not limited to:all employees involved in procurement activities (e.g.seeking quotes, submitting requisitions,receiving materials,processing invoices)or the administration of a City contract (e.g.,contract or project managers);evaluation committee members;and consultants and technical advisors. A.City's Procurement Regulations.In addition to any requirement stipulated herein,purchases funded by federal grants shall be in compliance with the City's own procurement regulations, including the requirements of Procedure PO.16.02. Ill.CODE OF ETHICS.All employees shall strictly adhere to City Procedure PO.03.01,Code of Ethics for Employees with Procurement Responsibilities,and the Miami-Dade County Conflict of Interest and Code of Ethics Ordinance (Section 2-11.1). IV.ALLOWABLE FEDERAL PROCUREMENT METHODS (2 CFR §200.320).Absent specific approval from the awarding federal agency (which may also be in the financial assistance agreement or funding agency program regulations),only the following five (5)methods of procurement may be used.Note that the methods and thresholds included herein may vary from the City's regular procurement regulations. 1.Micro Purchase.Micro purchases are small purchases made without the need for competition where the purchase price does not exceed $3,000 in the aggregate (or $2,000 for construction services covered by the Davis-Bacon Act). 2.Small Purchase Procedures (Quotes]_Quotes are normally allowed for purchases of goods and services,and construction services under $100,000.Federal regulation requires an "adequate"number of quotes,but as guidance,it is recommended that a minimum of three (3)quotes should be obtained.A no-bid or no-response does not count as a quote for obtaining multiple competitive quotes. a.For construction-related projects in excess of $3,000,the applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act must be confirmed prior to seeking quotes.Construction services is defined by the Davis Bacon Act as the construction,alteration,or repair (including painting and decorating)of public buildings or public works. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225O-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A233969 DATE ISSUED:Page:2 SEQUENCE N AI A A pr AL)MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT 3.Formal Sealed Invitations to Bid (1TB).For the purchase of goods and services,and construction services greater than $100,000 where cost is the primary determinant for award, an 1TB may be used.City 1TB procedures and standard practices apply.Cost analysis required when greater than $150,000. 4.Requests for Proposals (RFP).For the purchase of goods and services,and construction services greater than $100,000 where a combination of qualifications,proposed scope and cost are the determinants for the award,an RFP may be utilized.City RFP procedures and standard practices apply.Cost analysis required when greater than $150,000. S.Requests for Qualifications (RFQ).An RFQ may only be used for architectural,engineering, landscape architectural,and surveying services,or services performed by any architect, professional engineer,landscape architect,or registered surveyor and mapper in connection with his or her professional employment or practice (See Section 287.055,Florida Statutes) where qualifications is primary the determinant for the award.City RFQ procedures and practices apply.Typically,the RFQ is used for awards in excess of $35,000.For other goods or services,an RFQ may not be utilized.Cost analysis required when greater than $150,000. a.The use of continuing contracts must be approved by the awarding agency prior to use. 6.Non-Competitive Proposals.Non-competitive proposals are discouraged and are only be allowed only where: (i)the item is available from only one source, (ii)public exigency (urgency)or emergency will not allow the delay for a competitive solicitation, (iii)the federal awarding agency approves a written request,or (iv)after solicitation of a number of sources,competition is not obtained. The awarding agency should be notified for approval any time the City intends to enter into a non-competitive contract. 7.Purchases Pursuant to Piggyback Contracts are Discouraged.The use of piggyback contracts is strongly discouraged by FEMA and should be avoided.Piggybacking requires prior approval of the Procurement Department after confirming the following: a.The original contract contains appropriate assignability provisions that permit the assignment of all or a portion of the specified deliverables under the terms originally advertised,competed,evaluated,and awarded,or contains other appropriate assignment provisions. b.The vendor has,in writing,agreed to transfer all contractual rights of the contract to the City through assignment. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A233969 DATE ISSUED:Page:3 SEQUENCE N [/A N pr Ar I MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT c.The original contract was procured in compliance with 2 C.F.R.§§200.318-200.326. d.The contract price has been analyzed and determined to be fair and reasonable. e.The contract contains all the federally required contract provisions. f.The scope of work to be performed falls within the scope of work under the original contract and there are no changes to the contract that fall outside of what was reasonably considered by the parties when they entered into the contract. g.The scope of the assigned contract originally procured by the assigning party does not exceed the amount of property and services required to meet the assigning party's original,reasonably expected needs.The federal regulations require the recipient or subrecipient to have procurement procedures that preclude it from acquiring property or services it does not need.Therefore,a contract would have an improper original scope if the original party added excess capacity in the original procurement primarily to permit assignment of those contract rights to another entity.Moreover,an assignable contract with an overbroad scope of work may lead to unreasonable pricing and thus should not be used. h.The quantities the assigning party acquired,coupled with the quantities the acquiring grantee or subgrantee seeks,do not exceed the amounts available under the assigning entity's contract. V.ADVERTISEMENT (2 CFR §200.320).Formal solicitations (i.e.,1TB,RFP,RFQ)issued pursuant to this procedure,not exceeding an estimated value of $500,000,shall be publically advertised at least once in a newspaper of general circulation at least 21 days prior to the deadline for receipt of bids or proposals. Formal solicitations (i.e.,1TB,RFP,RFQ)issued pursuant to this procedure,exceeding an estimated value greater than $500,000,shall be publicly advertised at least once in a newspaper of general circulation at least 30 days prior to the deadline for receipt of bids or proposals. VI.GEOGRAPHICAL PREFERENCES PROHIBITED (2 CFR §200.320).The use of statutorily or administratively imposed state or local geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals is prohibited except where applicable federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage such a preference. VII.COST PLUS A PERCENTAGE OF COST MET HOD OF CONTRACTING PROHIBITED (2 CFR 200.323).The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting may not be used. VIII.TIME AND MATE RIALS MET HOD OF CONTRACTING DISCOURAGED (2 CFR 200.318(j)(1)).The City may only use time and material type contracts after a determination that no other contract is suitable. When such a determination has been made,the contract must include a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk.Additionally,no time or material reimbursement may be based on a cost plus method (See Sec.VII). DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-147084233969 DATE ISSUED:Page:4 SEQUENCE A ]jjDEjr I MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT IX.BOND REQUIREMENTS (2 CFR §200.325).Notwithstanding Florida law or City practice,at a minimum for construction or facility improvement contracts or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $150,000),the following requirements must be met: A .A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent (5%)of the bid price.The "bid guarantee"must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond,certified check,or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will,upon acceptance of the bid,execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified. B.A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. C.A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. X.FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION (2 CFR §200.319).Federal regulations regarding procurement transactions funded with federal financial assistance require such transactions to be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition.This means: A.In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage,contractors that develop or draft specifications,requirements,statements of work, and invitations for bids or requests for proposals shall be excluded from being considered for award of such procurements. B.Solicitations shall incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material,product,or service to be procured.Such description must not,in competitive procurements,contain features which unduly restrict competition.The following situations are specifically listed in federal regulations as situations considered to be restrictive of competition and must be avoided: 1.Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business; 2.Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; 3.Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; 4.Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; 5.Organizational conflicts of interest; 6.Specifying only a "brand name"product instead of allowing "an equal"product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement;and 7.Any other arbitrary action in the procurement process. C.The solicitation shall identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. D.When a Request for Proposals (RFP)method of solicitation is used,the RFP must identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance.The RFP solicitation shall contain in writing the method for conducting the technical evaluation and any other necessary evaluations of the proposals received.These evaluations may be conducted by the advisory committee appointed to review the proposals (or by a subcommittee thereof)or by a separate technical committee, as set forth in the RFP. D o cuS ign Envelope ID :AB30225D -FD EF-4660-86C 5-1470842 33969 DATE ISSUED:Page:5 SEQUENCE 1 A R 1n r AI I MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT XI.SPECIFICATION REVIEW.Specifications for the purchase of materials,supplies,equipment and services should permit open and competitive bidding.Requestors are responsible for assuring that the purchase of unnecessary or duplicative items is avoided.Consideration will be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase.Where appropriate,an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives,and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach. XII.CONTRACTING WITH SMALL AND MINORITY BUSINESSES,WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES,AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA FIRMS.(2 CFR §200.321).The City must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses,women's business enterprises,and labor surplus area firms are used when possible.Affirmative steps must include: A.Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists; B.Assuring that small and minority businesses,and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; C.Dividing total requirements,when economically feasible,into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses,and women's business enterprises; D.Establishing delivery schedules,where the requirement permits,which encourage participation by small and minority businesses,and women's business enterprises; E.Using the services and assistance,as appropriate,of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and F.Requiring the prime contractor,if subcontracts are to be let,to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (1)through (5)of this section. XIII.RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (2 CFR §200.322).The City and its contractors shall comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable,consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition,where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired by the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000;procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery;and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A2 33969 DATE ISSUED:Page:6 SEQUENCE +ALA AMID E X I MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)maintains a list of items which can be made with or use recovered (recycled)materials.(40 CFR,Part 247).For solicitations regarding the purchase or acquisition of those items for which guidelines have been adopted by the EPA,the requesting City department or division shall specify in its specifications the use of recovered materials and the highest percentage of recovered materials that reasonably may be required consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition.Federal law does not require the procurement of goods that (i)are not reasonably available within a reasonable amount of time,(ii)fail to meet reasonable performance standards,or (iii)are only available at an unreasonable price.Upon the conclusion of any contract requiring the use of recovered materials of an EPA listed item,the project manager from the requesting City department or division shall obtain a statement from the Contractor regarding the actual percentage of recovered materials utilized in the completion of the contract. XIV.CONTRACT COST AND PRICE (2 CFR §200.323). A.Cost or Price Analysis is Required.A cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the federal Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $150,000)shall be completed.The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation,but as a starting point,the requesting department must make or receive independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. B.Negotiation of Profit Requirement.The City must negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all cases where cost analysis is performed.To establish a fair and reasonable profit,consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed,the risk borne by the contractor,the contractor's investment,the amount of subcontracting,the quality of its record of past performance,and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work. XV.AWARD TO RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTORS (2 CFR S200.318).Consistent with Section 2-369 of the City Code,the City may only award contracts to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of the proposed procurement.In determining whether a contractor is responsible,consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity,compliance with public policy,record of past performance,and financial and technical resources.A contract may not be awarded to a party listed on the government-wide Excluded Parties List System in the System for Award Management (SAM)or to a party listed on the State of Florida's or City's suspended or debarred lists. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A2 33969 DATE ISSUED:Page:7 SEQUENCE AINA APE ALI MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT X V I.CO N T RA CT PRO V ISIO N S.All agreements awarded pursuant to this procedure shall,at a minimum, contain the contract provisions in Exhibit A entitled Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts under Federal Awards.The requesting City department or division shall provide the Procurement Department with any additionally required State or federal terms and conditions that must be included in the solicitation and the contract pursuant to a particular grant or award.In addition,the Byrd Anti- Lobbying Amendment Certification and Suspension and Debarment Certification are required as part of the solicitation or the contract. X V II.CO N T RA CT O V ERSIG H T.The City department or division which requested a solicitation or contract be issued or entered into by the Procurement Department shall be primarily responsible for maintaining diligent oversight over the contract and the contractor to ensure that the contractor performs in accordance with the terms,conditions,and specifications of its contract or purchase order.Written notice shall be provided to the Procurement Department of any situation in which a contractor is not performing in accordance with the terms,conditions,and specifications of its contract or purchase order for appropriate action,which action may be up to and include contract termination. XV III .PRO CU R EM EN T FILE (2 CFR 5200.318).For contracts awarded which are funded in part or in whole by State or federal financial assistance,the Procurement and Contracts Division project file shall contain the history of the procurement to include: A.A copy of the solicitation and all addenda thereto,if any; B.A copy of the publication or advertisement of the solicitation (if applicable); C.Copies of the quotes,bids,proposals or responses received; D.A copy of the Quote/Bid tabulation or selection committee meeting minutes; E.A copy of the Council Agenda item approving the contract (if required); F.A copy of the resulting contract and/or purchase order; G.Copies of any required bonds and/or certificates of insurance;and H.For federally funded procurements and contracts,the rationale for the method of procurement,selection of contract type,contractor selection or rejection,and the basis for the contract price. l.A screenshot or other documentation reflecting that the party awarded a contract was not listed on the government-wide Excluded Parties List System in the System for Award Management (SAM) or on the State of Florida's or City's suspended or debarred lists. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A2 33969 DATE ISSUED:Page:8 SEQUENCE »ALA AREA[I MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT XVIIII.REFERENCE.This procedure is based on the requirements of the "Procurement Standards"(2 CFR §200.317 through §200.326,and Appendix II)of the "Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards"(2 CFR Part 200)adopted by the Office of Management and Budget,available via the following link: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title02/2cfr200 main 02.tpl In the event of any conflict between standard City policy or practice and the federal Procurement Standards (now or as may be amended in the future),the federal Procurement Standards shall supersede for any procurement involving federal funds. D ocuS ign Envelope ID :AB30225D -FD EF-4660-B6C 5-147084 233969 DATE ISSUED:Page:9 SEQUENCE A AI A A ]I r A y MARCH 2018 Of:8 NUMBER: DATE UPDATED:PO.16.06 CITYWIDE PROCEDURE AUGUST 2020 SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND PROJECTS. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: PROCUREMENT Prepared by: ~DocuSigned by: ±-2-Procurement Director Reviewed by: Grants and Intergovernmental Affairs Director G DocuSigned by:s 1042 4C-493DZ4 4E Chief Learning and Development Officer ~ DocuSigned by: +.Ta E9ACO518F 2AA 41A. Assistant City Manager Approved by:G...8/31/2020 I 1:43 PM EDT C·t 0:>,jlCA18194070496 ...ry 1Ianager Date DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A233969 I EXHIBIT A Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards The following provisions shall be applicable to the Contract and shall supersede any conflicting provisions contained elsewhere in the Contract. A.BREACHES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION.For all purchases in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold,currently $150,000,the following provisions shall apply: (1)Disputes and Remedies -Disputes arising in the performance of this Contract which are not resolved by the Contractor and the City's project manager or contractor manager,shall be referred,in writing,to the authorized representative of the City Mayor for a decision.If there is a disagreement among the parties regarding the decision of the City Mayor's representative, then either party may submit any claim,counterclaim,dispute and other matters in question between the City and the Contractor arising out of or relating to this Contract or its breach to a court of competent jurisdiction within The City of Miami Beach. (2)Performance During Dispute -Unless otherwise directed by the City,Contractor shall continue performance under this Contract while matters in dispute are being resolved. (3)Claims for Damages -Should either party to the Contract suffer injury or damage to person or property because of any act or omission of the party or of any of his employees,agents or others for whose acts he is legally liable,a claim for damages therefore shall be made in writing to such other party within a reasonable time after the first observance of such injury of damage. B.TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE The City,at its sole discretion,reserves the right to terminate this Contract without cause upon thirty (30)days written notice.Upon receipt of such notice,the Contractor shall not incur any additional costs under this Contract.The City shall be liable only for reasonable costs incurred by the Contractor prior to notice of termination.The City shall be the sole judge of "reasonable costs." C.DEFAULT;REMEDIES;TERMINATION FOR CAUSE The City reserves the right to terminate this Contract,in part or in whole,or place the Contractor on probation,or to avail itself of all other remedies available at law and equity,inclusive injunctive relief and specific performance,in the event the Contractor fails to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions stated herein.Following breach of the Contract by the Contractor,the City shall provide written notice specifying the breach to the Contractor and advising the Contractor that the breach must be cured immediately or this Agreement may be terminated by the City.The City reserves the right to avail itself of any and all remedies available at law or at equity,including claims for damages and injunctive relief.The City further reserves the right to suspend or debar the Contractor in accordance with the appropriate City ordinances,resolutions and/or administrative/implementing orders.The vendor will be notified by letter of the City's intent to terminate if,following the initial notice of breach, the Contractor fails to timely or adequately and to the satisfaction of the City cure said breach.In the event of termination for default,the City may procure the required goods and/or services from any source and use any method deemed in its best interest.All re-procurement costs shall be borne by the terminated Contractor. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225O-FDEF-4660-86C5-14708A2 33969 2 EXHIBIT A D.EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (1)In connection with the performance of this Contract,the Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,religion,color,sex,age,disability,ancestry, marital status,pregnancy,sexual orientation,veteran's status,or national origin.The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed,and that employees are treated during employment,without regard to their race,religion,color,sex,age,disability,ancestry,marital status, pregnancy,sexual orientation,veteran's status,or national origin.Such action shall include,but not be limited to,the following:employment,upgrading,promotion,demotion or transfer,recruitment or recruitment advertising,layoff or termination,rates of pay or other forms of compensation,and selection for training,including apprenticeships.Contractor further agrees to insert a similar provision in all subcontracts,except subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials.The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places,available to employees and applicants for employment,notices to be provided by MDC setting forth the provisions of this Equal Opportunity clause. (2)The Contractor shall,in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor,state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,color,religion,sex,sexual orientation,gender identity,or national origin. (3)The Contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about,discussed,or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant.This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information,unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge,in furtherance of an investigation,proceeding,hearing,or action,including an investigation conducted by the employer,or is consistent with the Contractor's legal duty to furnish information. (4)The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding,a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers'representatives of the Contractor's commitments under this section,and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5)The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24,1965,and of the rules,regulations,and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6)The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24,1965,and by rules,regulations,and orders of the Secretary of Labor,or pursuant thereto,and will permit access to his books,records,and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules,regulations, and orders. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14 708A233969 3 EXHIBIT A (7)In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the Equal Opportunity clauses of this Contract or with any of the said rules,regulations,or orders,this contract may be canceled,terminated,or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24,1965,and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24,1965,or by rule,regulation,or order of the Secretary of Labor,or as otherwise provided by law. (8)The Contractor will include the provisions of this Equal Opportunity clause in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules,regulations,or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24,1965,so that such provisions will be binding upon each of Contractor's vendors and subcontractors.The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the City may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions,including sanctions for noncompliance. E.DAVIS-BACON ACT,AS AMENDED (40 U.S.C.5 3141-3148)and COPELAND "ANTI-KICKBACK"ACT (18 USC $40 U.S.C.3145).The Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act only apply to the emergency Management Preparedness Grant Program,Homeland Security Grant Program,Nonprofit Security Grant Program,Tribal Homeland Security Grant Program,Port Security Grant Program,and Transit Security Grant Program.They do not apply to other FEMA grant and cooperative agreement programs,including the Public Assistance Program.Accordingly,if applicable to this Contract: (1)All prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C.5$3141-3144,and 3146-3148)as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5,"Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction"). a)In accordance with the statute,and if applicable,the Contractor must pay all laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work,unconditionally and not less often than once a week,and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to 29 CFR part 3),the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof)at rates not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor.In addition,contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.The City will attach a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor to this form. b)Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under section 1(b)(2)of the Davis-Bacon Act on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages paid to such laborers or mechanics,subject to the provisions of paragraph (a)(1)(iv)of 29 CFR $5.5;also,regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period (but not less often than quarterly)under plans,funds,or programs which cover the particular weekly period,are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period.Such laborers and mechanics shall be paid the appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed,without regard to skill,except as provided in 29 CFR 5 5.5(a)(4). c)Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one classification may be compensated at the rate specified for each classification for the time actually worked therein:Provided,that the employer's payroll records accurately set forth the time spent in each classification in which work is performed.The wage determination (including any additional classification and wage rates conformed under paragraph (a)(1)(ii)of 29 CFR §5.5)and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH- 1321)shall be posted at all times by the Contractor and its subcontractors at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can be easily seen by the workers. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14 708A2 33969 4 EXHIBIT A (2)The Contractor shall comply with 18 U.S.C.§874,40 U.S.C.§3145,and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt.3 as may be applicable,which are incorporated by reference into this Contract. Contractors and Subcontractors are prohibited from inducing,by any means,any person employed in the construction,completion,or repair of public work,to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled.The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause in these subparagraphs (G)(1)and (2),and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include this clause in any lower tier subcontracts.The Contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with this clause.A breach of this clause may be grounds for termination of the Contract,and for debarment as a contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 C.F.R.§5.12. F.CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT OF 1962,40 U.S.C.§§3702 AND 3704. If applicable,the Contractor and all of its subcontractors shall comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act of 1962,40 U.S.C.§§3702 and 3704,requiring that mechanics and laborers (including watchmen and guards)employed on federally assisted contracts be paid wages of not less than one and one-half times their basic wage rates for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in a workweek.In the event of any violation of the preceding clause,the Contractor and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages.In addition,the Contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the City for liquidated damages.Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic,including watchmen and guards,employed in violation of the clause set forth herein,in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required.The City shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld,from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor,or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act,which is held by the same prime contractor,such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided herein.The Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts this clause set forth in subsection (Fl herein also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include this clause in any lower tier subcontracts.The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in herein. G.RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AWARD. If the Federal award meets the definition of "funding agreement"under 37 CFR §401.2 (a)and the City wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties,assignment or performance of experimental,developmental,or research work under that "funding agreement,"the City must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, "Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants,Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,"and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A4233969 5 EXHIBIT A H.THE CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1955,as amended,42 U.S.C.§§7401-7671q and the FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT,as amended,33 U.S.C.9S 1251-1387. (1)The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards,orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act,as amended,42 U.S.C.5 7401 et seq.and issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,as amended,33 USC §1251 et.seq. (2)The Contractor agrees to report each violation to the City and understands and agrees that the City will,in turn,report each violation as required to assure notification to the City,Federal Emergency Management Agency,and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office. (3)The Contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. I.ENERGY CONSERVATION. Contractor agrees to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the State energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C.Section 6321 et seq.)and (42 U.S.C.6201). J.CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT,SUSPENSION,INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION. (1)This Contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R.pt.180 and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000. As such the Contractor is required to verify that none of the Contractor,its principals (defined at 2 C.F.R.5 180.995),or its affiliates (defined at 2 CF.R.$180.905)are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R.S 180.940)or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R.§180.935).The Contractor must comply with 2CF.R.pt.180,subpart C and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000,subpart C and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the City.If it is later determined that the Contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R.pt.180,subpart C and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000,subpart C,in addition to remedies available to the City,the Federal Government may pursue available remedies,including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment.The Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R.pt.180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000,subpart C and shall include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions. (2)By signing and submitting this form,the Contractor shall also execute and provide the City with,and require all lower tiered contractors to also execute,the certification set out in "Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension,Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower tier Covered Transaction"attached hereto.The Contractor shall require all lower tier participants to agree that they:a.shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred,suspended,declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction,unless authorized in writing by the City;and ii.they will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion",and the certification form,without modification,in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.The Contractor may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred,suspended,ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction,unless it knows that the certification is erroneous.The Contractor may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals.The Contractor may,but is not required to check the Non- procurement List issued by U.S.General Service Administration.Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of system of records in order to render DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-14708A233969 6 EXHIBIT A in good faith the certification required by this clause.The knowledge and information of the Contractor and any other participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. If the Contractor or any other lower tier participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended,debarred,ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction,in addition to all remedies available to the Federal Government,the City may pursue available remedies including suspension and/or debarment. K.BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Contractors who apply or bid for or have received an award of $100,000 or more shall file the required certification.Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a member of Congress,officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract,grant,or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C.§1352.Each tier shall also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award.Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient. L.RECYCLEDPRODUCTS/RECOVERED MATE RIALS The Contractor agrees to comply with all the requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C.$6962),including but not limited to,the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247,and Executive Order 12873,as they apply to the procurement of the items designated in Subpart B of 40 CFR Part 247.AII goods and/or services to be purchased as a result of any award under this Contract shall be in accordance with all applicable governmental standards,including,but not limited to those issued by the Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),the National Institute of Safety Hazards (NIOSH),and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor and vendors to be regularly informed to conform to any changes in standards issued by any regulatory agencies that govern the commodities or services applicable to this solicitation,during the term of any contract resulting from this solicitation.In the performance of this Contract,the Contractor shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired: (1)Competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; (2)Meeting Contract performance requirements;or (3)At a reasonable price. Information about this requirement,along with the list of EPA-designated items,is available at EPA's Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site,https://www.epa.gov/smm/regulatory- background-comprehensive-procurement-guideline-program-cpg. M.CONTRACTING WITH SMALL AND MINORITY BUSINESS,WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES,AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA FIRMS,C.F.R.S 200.321(G). Pursuant to C.F.R.200.321 (g),the City will take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses,women's business enterprises,and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. Affirmative steps must include: (1)Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists; (2)Assuring that small and minority businesses,and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (3)Dividing total requirements,when economically feasible,into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses,and women's business enterprises; DocuSign Envelope ID:AB30225D-FDEF-4660-B6C5-1470842 33969 7 EXHIBIT A (4)Establishing delivery schedules,where the requirement permits,which encourage participation by small and minority businesses,and women's business enterprises; (5)Using the services and assistance,as appropriate,of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce;an (6)Requiring the prime contractor,if subcontracts are to be let,to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (1)through (5)above. N.ACCESS TO RECORDS.In addition to the provisions contained in the Contract,the following access to records requirements apply to this Contract: (1)The Contractor agrees to provide the City,the FEMA Administrator,the Comptroller General of the United States,or any of their authorized representatives access to any books,documents, papers,and records of the Contractor which are directly pertinent to this Contract for the purposes of making audits,examinations,excerpts,and transcriptions. (2)The Contractor agrees to permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed. (3)The Contractor agrees to provide the FEMA Administrator or his authorized representatives access to construction or other work sites pertaining to the work being completed under the Contract. 0.PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OF FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OF RELATED ACTS.The Contractor hereby acknowledges that 31 U.S.C.Chap.38 (Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements)applies to the Contractor's actions pertaining to the Contract. P.OHS SEAL,LOGO,AND FLAGS.The Contractor shall not use the DHS seal(s),logos,crests,or reproductions of flags or likenesses of DHS agency officials without specific FEMA pre-approval. Q.COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW,REGULATIONS,AND EXECUTIVE ORDERS.This is an acknowledgement that FEMA financial assistance may be used to fund all or a portion of the Contract. The Contractor will comply with all applicable Federal law,regulations,executive orders,FEMA policies, procedures,and directives. R.NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT The Federal Government is not a party to this Contract and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the non-Federal entity,Contractor,or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the Contract. S.CHANGES The Contract may be modified by mutual consent,in writing through the issuance of a modification to the Contract. T.INDEMNIFICATION For any work performed on Federally funded projects,the Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Federal Government,its employees and/or contractors,the County,its employees and/or contractors,and the City and its employees and/or contractors from liability to third parties for claims asserted under the contract. U.E-VERIFY.The Contractor shall utilize the U.S.Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Contractor during the term of the Contract and shall expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the Contract to likewise utilize the U.S.Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the Contract term. MIAMI BEACH APPENDIX F MIAMI BEACH 2CRF Appendix II to Part 200 2024-234-ND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SEWALLS AND LIVING SHORELINES PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT 1755 Meridian Avenue,3d Floor Miami Beach,Florida 33139 Appendix II to Part 200,Title 2 (up to date as of 5/02/2023) Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Fe... This content is from the eCFR and is authoritative but unofficial. Appendix II to Part 200,Title 2 Title 2 -Grants and Agreements Subtitle A-Office of M anagem ent and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements Chapter II -Office of M anagem ent and Budget Guidance Part 200 -Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Aw ards Source:85 FR 49543,Aug.13,2020,unless otherwise noted. Source:85 FR 49539,Aug.13,2020,unless otherwise noted. Authority:31 U.S.C.503 Source:78 FR 78608,Dec.26,2013,unless otherwise noted. Appendix II to Part 200-Contract Provi sions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Aw ards In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity,all contracts made by the non- Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following,as applicable. (A)Contracts for more than the simplified acquisition threshold,which is the inflation adjusted amount determined by the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils)as authorized by 41 U.S.C.1908,must address administrative,contractual,or legal remedies in instances where contractors violate or breach contract terms,and provide for such sanctions and penalties as appropriate. B)AII contracts in excess of $10,000 must address termination for cause and for convenience by the non- Federal entity including the manner by which it will be effected and the basis for settlement. (C)Equal Employment Opportunity.Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60,all contracts that meet the definition of "federally assisted construction contract"in 41 CFR Part 60-1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60-1.4(b),in accordance with Executive Order 11246, "Equal Employment Opportunity"(30 FR 12319,12935,3 CFR Part,1964-1965 Comp.,p.339),as amended by Executive Order 11375,"Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,"and implementing regulations at 41 CFR part 60,"Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs,Equal Employment Opportunity,Department of Labor." (D)Davis-Bacon Act,as amended (40 U.S.C.3141-3148).When required by Federal program legislation,all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C.3141-3144,and 3146-3148)as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5,"Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction").In accordance with the statute,contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor.In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation.The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination.The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland "Anti-Kickback"Act (40 U.S.C.3145),as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 2 CFR Appendix-II-to-Part-200(D)(enhanced display)page1of3 Appendix II to Part 200,Title 2 (up to date as of 5/02/2023) Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Fe ...2 CFR Appendix-II-to-Part-200(E} 3,"Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States").The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing,by any means,any person employed in the construction,completion,or repair of public work,to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled.The non- Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. (E)Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C.3701-3708).Where applicable,all contracts awarded by the non-Federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C.3702 and 3704,as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5).Under 40 U.S.C.3702 of the Act,each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours.Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week.The requirements of 40 U.S.C.3704 are applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary,hazardous or dangerous.These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market,or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. (F)Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement.If the Federal award meets the definition of "funding agreement"under 37 CFR S 401.2 (a)and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental,developmental,or research work under that "funding agreement,"the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401,"Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,"and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. (G)Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.7401-7671q.)and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.1251-1387), as amended-Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 must contain a provision that requires the non-Federal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards,orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.7401-7671a)and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C.1251-1387).Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (H)Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)-A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM),in accordance with the 0MB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp.,p.189)and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp.,p.235),"Debarment and Suspension."SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred,suspended,or otherwise excluded by agencies,as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. (I)Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C.1352)-Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the required certification.Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a member of Congress,officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract,grant or any 2 CFR Appendix-Il-to-Part-200(1}(enhanced display}page2of3 Appendix II to Part 200,Title 2 (up to date as of 5/02/2023) Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Fe ...2CFR Appendix-II-to-Part-200(J) other award covered by 31 U.S.C.1352.Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award.Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non-Federal award. ))See$200.323. (K)See$200.216. L)See $200.322. [78 FR 78608,Dec.26,2013,as amended at 79 FR 75888,Dec.19,2014;85 FR 49577,Aug.13,2020] 2CFR Appendix-II-to-Part -200(L)(enh anced display)page 3of3 ATTACHMENT C SUNBIZ &PROPOSAL RESPONSE TO RFQ th»2 D/IO of CREATIJ a utliciujl t at vi Fl»i(a w+tree DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Department of State I Division of Corporations /Search Records /Searchby EEL/EIN Number I Detail by FEI/EIN Number Florida Limited Liability Company BCC ENGINEERING,LLC Filing Information Document Number L19000118381 FEI/EIN Number 65-0540100 Date Filed 05/08/2019 Effective Date 03/15/1994 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event LC AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 04/29/2020 Event Effective Date NONE Principal_Address 6401 SW 87 AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Mailing Address 6401 SW 87 AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Registered Agent Name &Address MUNOZ,JOSE A 6401 SW 87 AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Authorized Person(s)Detail Name &Address Title CEO,SECRETARY MUNOZ,JOSE A 6401 SW 87TH AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Title EVP MILLAN,ARIEL 6401 SW 87TH AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Title CFO RODRIGUEZ,LUIS 6401 SW 87TH AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Title VP HERRERA,VICTOR 6401 SW 87TH AVE STE 200 MIAMI,FL 33173 Annual Reports Report Year 2022 2023 2024 Filed Date 01/12/2022 01/16/2023 01/16/2024 Document Images 01/16/2024 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/16/2023 --ANNUAL REPORT 01/12/2022 --ANNUAL_REPORT 09/22/2021 -AMENDED ANNUAL REP ORI 01/31/2021 --ANNUAL REPORT 04/29/2020 --LC Amendment 01/22/2020 --ANNUAL REPORT 05/28/2019 --LC Amendment 05/08/2019 --Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format BID SUBMITTAL QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION 1 -BID CERTIFICATION FORM This document is a REQUIRED FORM that must be submitted fully completed and submitted Solicitation No: BID NUMBER Solicitation Title: PROJECT TITLE BID D E R 'S NA M E :B C C Eng ineering LLC N O .O F YEA R S IN BU S IN E S S :30 I NO .OF YEARS IN BUSIN ESS LOCALLY:30 I NO .O F EM PLOYEES:379 O TH E R N A M E (S )BID D E R HA S O P E RA TE D UN D E R IN TH E LA ST 10 YEA R S:BC C Engineering,Inc. B ID D E R PR IM A R Y A D D R E S S (H E A D Q U A R TE R S ):6401 SW87th Avenue Suite 200 CITY ;Miam i STAT E :Florida I ZIP CO D E:33173 T E LE P H O N E NO .:3056702350 TO LL FR E E N O .:NIA FAX N O ..305-670-2351 BID D E R LO C A L A D D R ES S :640 1 SW 87th A venue Suite 200 CITY:Miami STATE :Flo rida I ZIP CO D E:33173 PR IM A R Y AC C O U N T R E P R E S E N TATIV E FO R TH IS EN G A G E M E N T:Vi ctor H.Herr era,PE A C C O U N T R E P TELE P H O N E NO .:3056 702350 A C C O U N T R E P TO LL FR E E NO .NIA A C C O U N T R E P EM A IL:V Herr era@ bcceng.com FE D E RA L TAX ID E N T IFIC A TIO N NO .:65-0540100 By virtue of submitting a bid,bidder agrees:a)to complete and unconditional acceptance of the terms and conditions of this document and the solicitation,including all addendums specifications,attachments, exhibits,appendices and any other document referenced in the solicitation c)that the bidder has not divulged,discussed,or compared the proposal with other bidders and has not colluded with any other bidder or party to any other bid;d)that bidder acknowledges that all information contained herein is part of the public domain as defined by the State of Florida Sunshine and Public Records Laws;e)if bid is accepted,to execute an appropriate City of Miami Beach document for the purpose of establishing a formal contractual relationship between the bidder and the City of Miami Beach,Florida,for the performance of all requirements to which the bid pertains;and f)that all responses,data and information contained in the bid submittal are true and accurate. The individual named below affirms thats/he:is a principal of the applicant duly authorized to execute this questionnaire,and that the contents of said document(s)are complete,true,and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. Name and Title of Bidder's Authorized Representative: Victor H.Herrera,PE Signature of Bidder 's Authorized Representative: Victor H.Herrera,PE SECTION 2 -ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDUM After issuance of solicitation,the City may release one or more addendum to the solicitation,which may provide additional information to bidders or alter solicitation requirements.The City will strive to reach every bidder having received solicitation through the City's e-procurement system.However,bidders are solely responsible for assuring they have received any and all addendum issued pursuant to solicitation.This Acknowledgement of Addendum section certifies that the bidder has received all addendum released by the City pursuant to this solicitation.Failure to obtain and acknowledge receipt of all addenda may result in proposal disqualification. Enter Initial Enter Initial Enter Initial to to Confirm to Confirm Confirm Receipt Receipt Receipt VH Addendum 1 Addendum 6 Addendum 11 Addendum 2 Addendum 7 Addendum 12 Addendum 3 Addendum 8 Addendum 13 Addendum 4 Addendum 9 Addendum 14 Addendum 5 Addendum 10 Addendum 15 If additional confirmation of addendum is required,submit under separate cover. SECTION 3 -CONFLICT OF INTEREST All bidders must disclose the name(s)of any officer,director,agent,or immediate family member (spouse,parent,sibling,and child)who is also an employee of the City of Miami Beach.Further,all bidders must disclose the name of any City employee who owns,either directly or indirectly,an interest of ten (10%)percent or more in the bidder entity or any of its affiliates. FIRST AND LAST NAME RELATIONSHIP 1 Not Applicable Not Applicable 2 Not Applicable Not Applicable 3 Not Applicable Not Applicable 4 Not Applicable Not Applicable 5 Not Applicable Not Applicable 6 Not Applicable Not Applicable SECTION 4 -FINANCIAL CAPACITY At time of request by the City,bidder shall request that Dun &Bradstreet submit its Supplier Qualifier Report directly to the City,with bid or within three (3)days of reguest.Bidder shall arrange for Dun &Bradstreet to submit a Supplier Qualification Report (SQR)directly to the City.No proposal will be considered without receipt (when requested),by the City,of the SOR directly from Dun &Bradstreet.The cost of the preparation of the SQR shall be the responsibility of the bidder.The bidder shall request the SQR report from D&B at: https://supplierportal.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/serylet/SupplierPortal? storeld=11696 Bidders are responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in its SQR. It is highly recommended that each bidder review the information contained in its SQR for accuracy prior to submittal to the City and as early as possible in the solicitation process.For assistance with any portion of the SQR submittal process,contact Dun &Bradstreet at 800-424-2495. SECTION 5 -REFERENCES AND PAST PERFORMANCE Project No. Project Title BID NUMBER PROJECT TITLE Bidder shall submit at least three (3)references for whom the bidder has completed work similar in size and nature as the work referenced in solicitation.Bidder may submit additional references as part of its bids submittal. Reference No.1 Firm Name:BCC Engineering,LLC Contact Individual Name and Title:Giancarlo Pena,PE,Project Manager Address:1700 Convention Ctr Dr#4,Miami Beach,FL 33139 Telephone:305-673-7490 Contact's Email:GiancarloPena@miamibeachfl.gov Narrative on Scope of Services Provided,Project Budget,and Project Dates: Various Seawall Replacements:This project is a task work order for the ongoing City of Miami Beach Professional Architectural and Engineering Services (A&E)in specialized categories on an "as needed-basis"Contract.The project involves civil engineering services associated with on-site modifications caused by the replacement of the seawalls throughout the City.New seawalls will replace existing seawalls in bad structural condition.The structural system will consist in prefabricated concrete panels and precast piles.2020-Ongong.Fee:$346K. Reference No.2 Firm Name:BCC Engineering,LLC Contact Individual Name and Title: Address:Camden Mills,PE,Capital Projects Engineer Telephone:(941)263-6138 Contact's Email:camden.mills@sarasotafl.gov Narrative on Scope of Services Provided,Project Budget,and Project Dates: City-Wide Bridge Rehabilitation &Seawall Hazard Mitigation:The City required the ability to engage structural engineering services on an as-needed basis throughout the life of the contract.Services could range from general consultation,to specific assignments required to support projects such as safety projects and Complete Streets,to services such as scoping,cost estimates,updating load ratings,and general support of the City's Planning Department.As a result,this TWO involved establishing a contract to enable the City to engage structural engineering and inspection services on an as-needed basis.2022-Ongoing,Fee:Varies,this is a task work order contract. Reference No.3 Firm Name:BCC Engineering,LLC Contact Individual Name and Title:Pablo Orozco,PE,Project Manager Address:1000 NW 111th Ave,Miami,FL 33172 Telephone:305-470-5370 Contact's Email:Pablo.Orozco@dot.stae.fl.us Narrative on Scope of Services Provided,Project Budget,and Project Dates: (SR)5/US 1/Overseas Highway/Old 7 Mile Bridge Rehabilitation Project:This project involves repairs to the major concrete bridge structure carrying SR5/Overseas Highway Over Channel 5 in the Florida Keys.The 4923' long bridge supports 2 traffic lanes and critical utilities.BCC investigated the existing bridge and field conditions.BCC prepared design construction documents,and plans for the rehabilitation of the bridge substructure.One innovative aspect of the project involved the use of thermal scanning and imagery to assess the existing conditions and map deficiencies.This enabled the creation of project-specific repair details and accurate quantity calculations required to avoid overruns and delays during construction.2015-2025 (Est.). Fee:$1.lM SECTION 6 -SUSPENSION,DEBARMENT,OR CONTRACT CANCELLATION Has bidder ever been debarred,suspended or other legal violation,or had a contract cancelled due to non-performance by any public sector agency? [C]Es [@@]No If answer to above is "YES,"bidder shall submit a statement detailing the reasons that led to action(s): SECTION 7 -SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Resolution 2020-31519,the City is tracking the Small and Disadvantaged Businesses,as certified by Miami-Dade County that have been certified as Small or Disadvantaged Business by Miami-Dade County. Does bidder possess Small or Disadvantaged Business certification by Miami-Dade County? [C]YEs [t@]No S.ION8 3B T BJSNFSS 'NTERPRISE ·-rEICATION Pursuant to Resolution 2020-31342,the City is tracking the utilization of LGBT owned firms that have been certified as an LGBT Business Enterprise by the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC). Does bidder possess LGBT Business Enterprise Certification by the NGLCC?[C ]vs [@]No SECTION 9 -BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT CERTIFICATION FORM APPENDIX A,44 C.F.R.PART 18-CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING Certification for Contracts,Grants,Loans,and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned Contractor certifies,to the best of his or her knowledge,that: 1.No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the extension,continuation,renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement. 2.If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,"in accordance with its instructions. 3.The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts,subgrants,and contracts under grants,loans,and cooperative agreements)and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31,U.S.C.§1352 (as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995).Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The undersigned Contractor certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and disclosure,if any.In addition,the Contractor understands and agrees that the provisions of 31 U.S.C.§3801 et seq.,apply to this certification and disclosure,if any. By virtue of submitting bid,bidder certifies or affirms its compliance with the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment Certification. Name and Title of Bidder's Authorized Representative: Victor H.Herrera,PE Signature of Bidder 's Authorized Representative: Victor H.Herrera,PE SECTION 10-SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT CER fl Fl CATION The Contractor acknowledges that: (1)This Contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R.pt.180 and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000. As such the contractor is required to verify that none of the Contractor,its principals (defined at 2 C.F.R.§180.995),or its affiliates (defined at 2 CF.R.S 180.905)are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R.§180.940)or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R.§180.935). (2)The Contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R.pt.180,subpart C and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000,subpart C and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (3)This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the City.If it is later determined that the Contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R.pt.180,subpart C and 2 C.F.R.pt. 3000,subpart C,in addition to remedies available to the City,the Federal Government may pursue available remedies,including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. (4)The Contractor agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R.pt.180,subpart C and 2 C.F.R.pt.3000,subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer.The Contractor further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions." By virtue of submitting bid,bidder certifies or affirms its compliance with the Suspension and Debarment Certification. Name and Title of Bidder's Authorized Representative: Victor H.Herrera,PE Signature of Bidder's Authorized Representative: Victor H.Herrera,PE SECTION 11 -CONE OF SILENCE Pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code,all procurement solicitations once advertised and until an award recommendation has been forwarded to the City Commission by the City Manager are under the "Cone of Silence."The Cone of Silence ordinance is available at https:_//library.municode.com/fl/miami beach/codes/code of ordinances? nodeld=SPAGEOR CH2AD ARTVIISTCO DIV4PR S2-486COSI Any communication or inquiry in reference to this solicitation with any City employee or City official is strictly prohibited with the of exception communications with the Procurement Director,or his/her administrative staff responsible for administering the procurement process for this solicitation providing said communication is limited to matters of process or procedure regarding the solicitation.Communications regarding this solicitation are to be submitted in writing to the Procurement Contact named herein with a copy to the City Clerk at rafaelgranado@miamibeachfl.gov . By virtue of submitting bid,bidder certifies that it is in compliance with the Cone of Silence Ordinance,pursuant to Section 2-486 of the City Code. SECTION 2-CODE OH BUSINESS ETHICS Pursuant to City Resolution No.2000-23789,the Bidder shall adopt a Code of Business Ethics prior to executing a contract with the City.The Code of Business Ethics shall be submitted to the Procurement Department with its response or within three (3)days of request by the City.The Code shall,at a minimum,require the Bidder,to comply with all applicable governmental rules and regulations including,among others,the conflict of interest,lobbying and ethics provision of the City Code.In lieu of submitting Code of Business Ethics,bidder may indicate that it will adopt,as required in the ordinance,the City of Miami Beach Code of Ethics,available at http://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city- hall/procurement/procurement-related-ordinance-and-procedures] Bidder will submit firm's Code of Business Ethics within three (3)days of request by the City? &@ ]YES D I NO Bidder adopts the City of Miami Beach Code of Business Ethics?[]Yes []No SECTION 13-LOBBYIST REGISTRATION &CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS This solicitation is subject to,and all bidders are expected to be or become familiar with, all City lobbyist laws,including lobbyist registration requirements and prohibition on campaign contributions,including: •Lobbyist Registration Requirements sections 2-397 through 2-485.3 of City Code (https://library.municode.com/fl/miami beach/codes/code of ordinances? nodeld=SPAGEOR CH2AD ARTVIISTCO DIV3LO) •Campaign Contribution Requirements sections 2-487 and 2-488 of City Code (https://library.municode.com/fl/miami beach/codes/code of ordinances? nodeld=SPAGEOR CH2AD ARTVIISTCO DIV5CAFIRE) By virtue of submitting bid,bidder certifies or affirms that they have read and understand the above Lobbyist Registration &Campaign Contribution Requirements. SECTION 14-NON-DISCRIMINATION The Non-Discrimination ordinance is available at: https://library.municode.com/fl/miami beach/codes/code of ordinances? nodeld=SPAGEOR CH2AD ARTVIPR DIV3COPR S2-375NSCCOREWA By virtue of submitting bid,bidder agrees it is and shall remain in full compliance with Section 2- 375 of the City of Miami Beach City Code. SECTION 15 -FAIR CHANCE REQUIREMENT The Fair Chance Ordinance No.2016-4012 is available at: https://library.municode.com/fl/miami beach/codes/code of ordinances? nodeld=SPAGEOR CH62HURE ARTVFACHOR By virtue of submitting bid,bidder certifies that it has adopted policies,practices and standards consistent with the City's Fair Chance Ordinance.Bidder agrees to provide the City with supporting documentation evidencing its compliance upon request.Bidder further agrees that any breach of the representations made herein shall constitute a material breach of contract, and shall entitle the City to the immediate termination for cause of the agreement,in addition to any damages that may be available at law and in equity. SECTION 16 PUBLIC E TITY CRIMES Please refer to Section 287.133(2)(a),Florida Statutes,available at: https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/287_133 By virtue of submitting bid,bidder agrees with the requirements of Section 287.133,Florida Statutes,and certifies it has not been placed on convicted vendor list. SECTION 17 VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PREFERENCE Pursuant to City of Miami Beach Ordinance No.2011- 3748,https://library.municode.com/fl/miami beach/codes/code of ordinances? nodeld=SPAGEOR CH2AD ARTVIPR DIV3COPR S2- 374PRPRPRVECOGOCOSE the City shall give a preference to a responsive and responsible bidder which is a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or which is a service-disabled veteran business enterprise,and which is within five percent (5%)of the lowest and best bidder,by providing such bidder an opportunity of providing said goods or contractual services for the lowest responsive bid amount.Whenever,as a result of the foregoing preference,the adjusted prices of two (2)or more bidders which are a small business concern owned and controlled by a veteran(s)or a service-disabled veteran business enterprise constitute the lowest bid pursuant to an 1TB,RFP,RFQ,ITN or oral or written request for quotation,and such bids are responsive,responsible and otherwise equal with respect to quality and service,then the award shall be made to the service-disabled veteran business enterprise. Is the bidder a service-disabled veteran business enterprise certified by the State of Florida?[C]YEs [@@ ]No Is the bidder a service-disabled veteran business enterprise certified by the United States Federal Government? []YEs [z ]No SECTION 18-MORATORIUM ON TRAVEL TO AND THE PURCHASE OF GOODS OR SERVICES FROM MISSISSIPPI Pursuant to Resolution 2016-29375,the City of Miami Beach,Florida prohibits the purchase of goods or services sourced in Mississippi.Are any of the products for which the applicant is seeking to be prequalified sourced in Mississippi? If yes,explain. D I YES ]No "P799E/9/7WEEP « MIAMI BEACH P -p r "4"_g "~gH a s pt u th g $e e he sos ls#itssicks ?is.i 83] SOLICITATION 2024-234-ND r•. •·.,.IM----- ¥i e #e ''Iy--- l-{- COVER LETTER 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS o»oar ±IRINEEERI0 E.II±85 YUE±III3WIU LIU SILIS 3±Irr »3024-±34-3) be TAB 1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS M ay 28,20 24 N atalia Delgado,CPPB,Contracting O fficer City of M iami Beach,1700 Convention Center Drive, M iam i Beach,FL 33139 RE:Engineering Services for Seawalls and Living Shorelines 2024-234-ND Dear M s.Delgado and M em bers of the Evaluation Committee, BCC Engineering (BC C )looks forw ar d to once again collaborating w ith the City of M iami Beach (the City)in support of its seaw all prioritization.W e hope that this proposal leaves the City w ith three lasting impressions: Q BCC has a thorough understanding of the City's needs and the critical importance of seawalls with respect to City initiatives such as resiliency,environmental responsibility,and community.W e are eager to co ntribute our expertise in resilient systems,dependability,and future -pro of engineering designs to support the City's efforts towar ds a more sustainable and resilient future. Q Seawall repair and replacement and coastal infrastructure is "what we do".BCC has held continuing service 5-year FDO T Structure M aintenance contracts for over a decade.W e currently hold FDOT Structures Maintenance contra cts in District s l,3,and 6.W e have assessed,repaired,and replaced Florida seawalls from the Panhandle to Tampa Bay dow n through the Keys. Q Miami is our home.This is where we live,work,and play.Simply stated,we will take ow nership of this contract like no other firm can.To us,this contra ct is personal.W e are proud to say that.And we would be honored to continue to uphold our shar ed quality of life thro ugh this contract. BCC,fo unded in M iami in 19 94 as a local Florida-based firm,has steadfastly dedicated itself to fulfilling the demands of both our private and public sector clientele.O ur expertise lies in the realm of structura l,planning,design,and construction management, encom passing a w ide spectrum of services including civil,enviro nmental,site development,traffi c engineering,multi-modal tra nsit,com plete streets,and highw ay engineering pro ject s.Th e City's commitment to partnering with innovative and solutions- oriented engineers aligns perfectly w ith our values and capabilities. W e recognize the significance of the recently adopted Resiliency Standar ds ordinance,which mandates minimum elevations for new seaw alls to enhance coastal resilience and mitigate the effects of tidal flooding.BCC is well-versed in these standards, having provided similar services for the City previously,most recently Miami Beach's Jefferson Street End Seawall,and is prepar ed to ensure compliance w hile incorpora ting innovation and maximizing sustainable solutions for the City. BCC is fa miliar w ith the City's "M iami Beach Rising Above"progra m,which encompasses a w ide array of initiatives,from gra nts pro moting sustainability and enviro nmental stew ar dship to climate science studies,climate adaptation strategies, CLIMATE MITIGATION and private property adaptation programs.W e look for ward to working in para llel w ith the City on opportunities related to living shore lines as well,as evidenced by successful projects like the Brittany Bay Park seaw all rehabilitation,w here we can integra te similar structura l seawall designs alongside natura l shoreline enhancements to protect habitats and enhance coastal resilience in other areas of the City. MIAM BEACH RISING ABOVE /MA TE SCIENCE CLIMATE ADAPTATION W e understand the importance of co llabora tion w ith local non-pro fit organizations,academic institutions,and other stakeholders, as outlined in the City's par tnerships w ith organizations like Florida International University and the Urban Land Institute.Our firm is co m m itted to w orking closely w ith the City and its chosen partners to develop tailored solutions that address Miami Beach's unique strengths and vulnera bilities. MIAMI BEA C H 0 «roso s EIIIEEE-III)8IV3J 1#3III15 II)1JIU SIII1IE} 39±Irr0y ±9 2 4 234 -3/) beengng TAB 1 COVER LETTER AND TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.J As par t of BCC's dedication to the City,w e w ill be dedica ted to these pillars of resiliency as we pro vide professional engineering solutions as detailed w ithin the scope of services outlined in bid document number 2024-234-ND:e $ % Dedication to Resilience:BC C w ill prioritize designs and solutions which enhance the resilience of Miami Beach's coastal areas,ensuring infrastructure is poised to withstand the impacts of climate change,sea-level rise,and extrem e w eather events. Dedication to Innovation and Solutions:BC C w ill bring innovative approaches and technologies to the table, constantly seeking new w ays to improve seaw all infrastructure,enhance flood protection,and address environm ental concerns. Dedication to Clim ate Change A daptation:Recognizing the urgency of climate change,BCC will focus on developing adaptive strategies and solutions that help the City of M iami Beach adapt to changing environmental conditions,including rising sea levels and increased flood risks. rLrl Dedication to Establishing O verland Flooding Barriers City-w ide:The firm will work towar ds establishing a ..ed._comprehensive netw ork of storm surge and overland flooding bar riers,integrating these barriers into the urban landsca pe w hile maxim izing their effectiveness and sustainability.%qQ Dedkat;on to Cl;mate M;1;gat;on,lo addmao ta adaptafoo ellmts,we will soppa,i ioitialives aimed at mitigaliog the effects of clim ate change,such as promoting green infrastructure,and implementing sustainable practices in .seaw all design and construction. @ Dedication to City's Resiliency Standards and Tidal Flood Protection:BCC will adhere to the City's resiliency standar ds fo r tidal flood protection,ensuring all designs and projects meet elevation requirements and contribute to the overa ll resilience of the City of M iami Beach's coas tal ar eas. As the City looks tow ards the future,including policy changes,public projects,and green infrastructure initiatives,the BCC Team is ready to contribute its expertise and innovative thinking to help M iami Beach achieve its resilience goals.O ur track record of successful projects -w hich w ill be evidenced in our pro posal,our lasting partnerships with our complete Team of experts,and our dedication to environm ental stew ar dship,make us the dependable and fo rw ar d-thinking trusted advisor the City needs. W e look fo rw ard to the opportunity to collabora te and contribute to the success of the City of M iami Beach.W e are excited about the potential par tnership and the positive impact w e can make together. %(A)PRIME BIDDER................... ")(Gfol)fa [)rf@))'ET (@l ': •••••engneenng B)SELECTION BCC Engineering,LL C l'-6401 SW 87 Ave,Suite 200,M iami,FL 33173 Victor H.Herrera,PE,Senior Vice President---~---~--------'- Phone:305-670-2350,Email:VHerrera @ bcceng.co m errera ,PE Senior Vice President BC C Engineering,LLC M IA M I BEA C H «no«soar EI0IIEEE7If$III%E8 10LJ±I'IAII3 II)LJ)I)EL} »9±4 n o»±9±4-±34-340 TABLE OF CONTENTS be COVER LETT ER &TABLE OF CONTENTS l Cover Letter 1 Table of Contents 3 EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM 4 2.1 Qualifications of Proposing Firm 4 2.2 Qualifications of the Bidder Team:Organizational Chart.13 2.2 Qualifications of the Bidder Team:Team Resumes 14 2.2.1 Qualifications of the Bidder Team:Project Experience 64 2.3 Evidence of Prior Working Experience 66 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 68 3.1.1 Site Investigation and Feasibility Studies 68 3.1.2 Project Planning and Design 71 3.1.3 Bidding and Construction Management 87 3.1.4 Geotechnical Engineering 90 3.1.5 Coastal Engineering 91 3.1.6 Environmental Engineering 92 3.1.7 Risk Assessment and Mitigation 93 3.1.8 Project Documentation and Reporting 94 3.1.9 Maintenance and Rehabilitation 95 3.1.10 Other Value-Added Services 98 3.2 Supplier Diversity 100 MIAMVBEACH e ngine e ring GETTING THEREJUSTGOTEASIER' -~•. ,s +nt .•si MIAMI BEACH '----..__..-.,----..,.-~ fl {ji lt +e e E '.-'.::--_..~-•~ III 8%.) SOLICITATION 2024-234-ND f ? \\ al .h;'sk i ",g:+iiEE;i %9a#?$±gig$Eh3 "@2l k s ;£••- :+'±ii$jg3k,)''lgg839$$,#$ii3jg#pg,==.oSt;;'ks »is.." ff3%3 TE%####$"5 3,,7e •"r",'-+.E3;cs EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS 0F THE FIRM AND TEAM woo»cs EIIIEI }RI;GI#SAILS IJ LIIIJ IBELIE; 30!1Sf »2924-234-)9 be TAB 2 EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONT.J and load ra tings fo r many structure pro jects thro ughout the year s,including bridge design spanning var ious types such as short span flat slab bridges,AASHTO girder,and Florida-I Beam (FIB)bridges.His experience includes seaw all projects, including serving as the Engineer for approximately 1,000 feet of new seaw all along SR A 1 A (South Roosevelt Boulevar d)in Key W est,Florida,w here he designed a cantilevered steel sheet pile wall to w ithstand w ave im pact fo rces and scour from storm events.His expertise extends to other structura l pro jects such as the afo rementioned How ar d Fra nkland Bridge replacement pro ject w here he serves as the Principal-in-C har ge.M r.Raymat has served as Engineer-of-Record on over 60 bridges and as the Lead Structures Engineer on major design-build pro jects exceeding $1.4 billion,show casing his comprehensive experience in infrastructure development and resilience. STRUCTURES QUALITY CONTROL William "Bill"Junkin,PE (BCC) M r.Junkin's extensive engineering journey began in 1975 after gra duating from Louisiana State University.He star ted at Intern ational Paper Company,contributing to major industrial w astew ater tre atment facility designs in M ississippi.M oving to the Louisiana Depar tment of Transportation and Development in 1976,he honed his skills in bridge design,later tra nsitioning to the private sector w here he managed var ious tra nspor tation and public w orks pro ject s in Louisiana and Florida.W ith over 33 year s of experience in bridge design,including fixed and m ovable bridges,he joined G LF Construction in 2009,furthering his expertise in engineering activities,technical support,and tem porar y w orks for bridge and mar ine pro jects.His structura l designs encompass diverse bridge types,including prestressed and post-tensioned girder spans,box girder spans,and var ious substructure designs using co ncrete,steel,and drilled shafts. He brings over 45 year s of experience to the team. COASTAL ENGINEERING QUALITY CONTROL Michael Krecic,PE {INT) M r.Krecic has extensive experience in coastal engineering and design,as demonstra ted by his involvement in severa l significant pro jects.For example,in the Phased Design Build pro ject w ith the Florida Department of Transportation (FDO T),he oversaw the installation of seaw alls along SR A 1 A to safeguar d against hurricane surges.Th is pro ject involved detailed analyses of historical beach pro files,shoreline changes,and simulations of storm responses with sea level rise considera tions.Additionally, he served as the Project Manager and Coastal Engineer for the Liberty St.Mar ina Coastal Engineering Design Support and Flushing Study in Jacksonville,FL.Here,he developed wave and hydrodynamic conditions fo r a new mar ina,ensuring compliance with enviro nmental regulations by assessing tidal circulation (flushing)of the pro posed basin.In another relevant project for the City of Jacksonville,M r.Krecic designed a rock revetment fo r placement under and adjacent to the O CEARCH pier in Mayport along the St.Johns River,showcasing his expertise in coastal pro tection and engineering solutions. Th ese projects collectively highlight M r.Krecic's leadership, comprehensive skills,and dedication to ensuring the resilience and functionality of co astal infrastructure in challenging enviro nmental conditions.a ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST Dylan Larson,SPWS,CEP,GTA {MLA) M r.Lar son,with 30 year s of experience in enviro nmental consulting experience in South Florida,excels in directing biological and ecological studies for var ious projects.He led a benthic natura l resource survey for seawall replacements in M iami Beach,ensuring compliance with enviro nmental regulations and developing mitigation measures for co ra ls and seagra sses.At E.G.Sew ell Par k in Miami,he coordinated a comprehensive redevelopment,integra ting landsca pe ar chitecture,civil engineering,and ecological enhancements. Additionally,he managed a five-year mitigation monitoring pro gra m at River Par k M ar ina in Port St.Lucie,overseeing exotic species removal and shoreline protection.His expertise ensures sustainable development while preserving natural resources. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST William Mohler,PWS,CA,TRAQ,CLI (MLA) M r.M ohler is a seasoned enviro nmental consultant with extensive experience in enviro nmental document prepar ation, ecological monitoring and assessment,compliance monitoring, and geographic info rmation systems (G IS).Recently,he has led significant projects such as conducting a benthic natura l resource survey for seaw all replacements in M iami Beach, w hich involved documenting cora ls and seagrasses and M IAM I BEACH o «soar ±IEEE»I ±)IVE;IBSEN!III9S III LJLU 'III 39!IHI1II 2924-234 ID TAB 2 EXPERIENCE 6 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONTJ ensuring regulatory compliance w ith the DERM Class I Coastal Resources Permit.He also managed the temporar y relocation and post-relocation monitoring of co ra ls for the N Bay Road and 48th Street End Seaw all project,ensuring the co rals' stability and survival.Additionally,M r.O ra nge provided critica l assessments and recomm endations fo r mangrove removal during the boar dw alk replacem ent on Deerfield Island,ensuring compliance w ith South Florida W ater M anagement District (SFW M D )regulations.His w ork consistently demonstrates a comm itment to balancing environmental preservation w ith infrastructura l developm ent.Ta tum Waterw ay Pedestrian Bridge PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER A lejand ro M o ntene gro,PE (G C ES ) M r.M ontenegro,w ith over 30 year s of expertise in G eotechnical Engineering,M aterials Testing,and Engineering Inspection,has managed a w ide ar ra y of pro jects in both the public and private sectors.He has held var ious positions including O ffice M anager,Division M anager,and Executive M anager at major engineering consulting firms in South Florida. His pro ject portfolio spans subsurfa ce explora tion,foundation isl< studies,and construction material testing for diverse structures such as bridges,roadw ays,airports,and high-rise buildings.As the fo under and President of GC ES Engineering Services,M r. M ontenegro oversees geotechnical and construction material testing projects,notably managing contracts in M iami-Dade County since 1999 O U R TEA M 'S CO M M ITM EN T O ur dedica ted Team has already analyzed the City's priority list for seaw all repairs,dem onstrating our commitment and understanding of the community's needs. 390 A lton Rood TEA M O RG A N IZ A TIO N A L CH A RT &RESU M ES Foirw a.D rive Street End Please see pages 13-6l for our Team's organizational chart and resumes. M IA M I BEACH 0o M IA M I BEACH 3I0LIE±II0J S3IV8 ILL'III}ADJ LJIII8IEAILS--' $G }¢A 7)2 .3 33J/Sf) 1572 %.-,bc TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONT) Th e fo llow ing ta ble o utlines our experience,alo ng w ith sim ilar relevant pro ject experience related to the scope of our w ork.Th e subsequent pages delve deeper into the details of the most relevant pro jects co m p leted by BC C Eng ineering,providing com prehensive insights into our capabilities and accom plishm ents. #%#4EC7CT"JEE.FEE-TEI 003-2006 IZEIISII c I e g DEP Seawall A orina Proara t per.el 2 Fort La uderd a le Seaw all M a ster Pla n l Bob Forond,PE,FRSE l 2016 _2017]✓✓Fort Lauderdale,FL Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE Terminal Island Seawall Design Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE 2021-2022 ✓✓✓✓✓✓Miami Beach,FL Guslovo Llonos,PE Bello Isla Seowoll ].·1 ·l ✓✓✓✓d ,,A h,FL Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE 2017-2019iamieach,[ 4FleetManagementSeawallAssessment&Replacement,Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE 9917.2018 ✓✓✓✓✓M ia m i Beach,Fl G ustavo Llanos,PE j S Seowall Replacement 48'"Street and 29'Street,·1•Ch..A .PE SI FRSE_l __-2021-•✓✓✓✓✓Miami Beach,FL wistian Aquino,:,'O ngoing .-. 7 V a riou s Sea w all Re pla cem ents Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE 2020-✓✓✓✓✓M ia m i Bea ch,FL Ongoing B Civil Design for Brickell &Coconut Grove Sea.walls between!Ch ••A -PE SI FRSE ·1 2024-I ✓✓✓✓✓SE 25 Rd to Matheson Ave &Biscayne Bay,Miami,FL ristian Aquino,-,Ongoing -···-··········'-··-·-···--····-··-··-•• toward Frankland Bridge Seawalls Design-Build,Gustavo Llanos,PE 20201 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Tampa/St.Petersburg.FL 2025 (Et.) JO Okeechobee Raad Bulkhead Wall•,[-Bob Forand,PE,FRSE -__1_·_-1998-2000 1 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Miami-Dode County,Fl -• 44 le Jeune Road Bulkhead wall",Bob Forand,PE,FRSE j 1998-2001 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Miami-Dade County,Fl o M ia m i River G reenw ay s Sea w all,I Christion-Aquino,PE,SI,FRS~_2009 -2014 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Miami,Fl lJ Normandy Shores Seawall,Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE 2013-2014 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓M ia m i Beach,FL 14 Palmetto Expressway Section 5 Canal Bulkhead Woll,·1 Gustavo Llonos,PE -12009-2016 l ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓DB',Miami-Dade County,FL 4 SR997 /Krome Ave from Kendall Dr to 8"St,Gustovo Llanos,PE 2007-2009 ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓Miami,FL I ity-Wide Bridge Rehabilitation &Gustavo llanos,PE ] 2022-✓✓✓✓✓✓Se aw a ll H a zard M itiga tio n,Sara sota,FL ,Ongoing "Steel sheet pile bulkhead wall along the Miami Canal ]""Bulkhead wall along o canal MIAMI BEACH ·1 ,,....--'.,11.ll73,i •' vi ' pif@I.·........._·.•-.-.·~~ a #ff"",a%I''•.•2 JkA "•,II -,..-.-·"p Ea 9£ k , ~•. r 9$3,g,/@-ug-es ;2Ng2 Pqf.y,_ •"!,,~;.:...-,-~·:_,...---~ i s±! as;-.ae. - : , 1 ·- Beg' o MIAMI BEACH 3II0ILE:±III9 $3IE38 3JI83ZILL58IIJ LJIII IEE 32W:+7J#rs 3v33 933 r» Ho 1 TAB 2 EXPERIENCE 6 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM CONT) 0-LILL,III.I7.9ill) Statewide,FL 'v --~ G-''i'i IM LIEA3I.IE SI'LLIV3 Aul! Ft.Lauderdale,FL Project Description BCC personnel served in the capacity of Stoff Augmentation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection [FDEP)Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems.In this copocity,staff was responsible regulatory review of all applications that involved armoring ([seawall,revetments, geotubes,and other rigid coastal structures).Additional responsibilities consisted of: •Coordinating with local,state,and federal environmental agencies,as well as project professionals in processing permits. Reviewing and issuing permits far construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCC). •Providing impact assessments for proposed activities and long-term effects on the beach/ dune system. Monitoring coastal construction and related activities in five counties (Volusia,Flagler,St Johns,Duval,and Nassau). •Providing site inspections for existing and proposed construction sites. •Reviewing all armoring applications statewide,including seowalls,revetments,geotubes, and all other rigid coastal structures. •Providing emergency assistance to W alton County following hurricane Dennis to provide damage assessment as well as approach strategy tor reconstruction. Coordinating with Florida fish and W ildlife Conservation Commission,U.S.Fish and W ildlife,and the State of Florida on handling regulatory issues with the construction of rigid structures in the Panhandle. Agency Name:FDEP Agency Contract:Not Applicable Agency Contact:Celoro Jackson ]850-921./757 ]Celora.o jackson@dep.state.fl.us BCC Role:Personal experience for Victor H.Herrera,PE Term of Engagement:2003 -2006 RELEVANCY RESILIENCY SEA LEVEL RISE COASTAL LOCATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ]SCOUR COUNTERMAsuRs [ ]FORTIFY EXISTING SEAwAus ] ASSESSMENI INSPECTION Project Description The City owns approximately 4.3-miles of seawall structures and 2.0 miles of natural banks. This task work order,under the City of Fort Lauderdale's Continuing Structural Services Contract awarded lo BCC,required the assessment of the comprehensive needs of these structures and banks,and development of o Seawall Master Plan throughout the City. The Plan consisted of individual assessment reports for each component,as well as a report summarizing the findings and recommendations to include feasible solutions,impacts,and cost estimates.Seawall assessments included:Inspection of existing structures (above and below water),and recommendations for the seawall infrastructure in need of rehabilitation or replacement.The Plan also addressed potential structural modifications and bank needs to address the challenges associated with Sea level Rise (SLR) Agency Name:City of Fort Lauderdale Agency Contract:RFQ 456-11637 Agency Contact:Brandy Leighton,PE [954-828-5326 {Bleighton@fortlauderdole.gov BCC Role:Prime Term of Engagement:2016 -2017 MIAMI BEACH RELEVANCY RESILIENCY SEA LEVEL RISE REPAIR VS.REPLACEMENT INSPECTION ASSESSMENT COST ESTIMATES SEAWALL PRIORITIZATION DEVELOP CITY SEAWALL STANDARDS o MIAMI BEACH 3III:±RI9 3±1II8 3II3NILL±AM ss.mr=TS7777%"lk#It5JI)!,dli.3 be TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM lCONT.J 1#0IMM,IIIMAI Miami Beach,FL AL$.IE.A $I#IL Miami Beach,FL Project Description The project consists of providing approximately 1,300 linear feet of new seawall at Terminal Island.The project was completed in two phases.Phase l included the preliminary plans for pricing.Phase ?consisted of the preparation of permit plans and final design.The approximately 50-ft of retained wall height required o king pile system with an anchored deadman system.Layout of the anchors and deadman required significant coordination with the building designer to provide envelopes or areas for the future building foundations to be constructed.Interaction of the future building foundations also required coordination to ensure the wall anchorage and the building foundations did not negatively impact one another. Agency Nome:Kearns Construction Company Agency Contract:Not Applicable Agency Contact:John Kearns [305-461-0310 ]jkearns@kearnsconstruction.com BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2021-2022 RELEVANCY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROJECT I RESILIENCY IN SPEC HON ASSES5MENI REPAIR VS.REPLACEMENI CONSTRUCTABIITY COST ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION Project Description As part of the design of the new development project,BCC assessed the existing wall and provided design,construction administration,and inspections for the new steel sheet pile wall The new wall provided resiliency for sea level rise and protection for the new complex. Agency Name:Euro American Group Agency Contract:Not Applicoble Agency Contact:Angel Torres I 305-674-1818 BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2017 -2024 MIAMI BEACH RELEVANCY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROJECT RESILIENCY COASTAL EXPOSURE INSPECTION ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTABILITY COST ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION o MIAMI BEACH ±IIE:±II0.±3I8,3I8IILLSAIL II9SIIEIIIE; 737Fr 3Y3333. ·,%, TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONT) .,3% g@egg@,/1J117 ,8 /2133pp@13,/,73f7°re bl'!l#}}is}lid&it!'!j'Ill/ll Miami Beach,FL l.II$$.MALL[ELIE«ERIE Miami Beach,FL 77 jw nn TVT nTf :f'a %q4y .',i. 1iMB3II/'Sa4MIL Project Description The Fleet Management facility is located on Terminal Island.The rear of the building is adjacent to Government Cut and has an existing steel sheet pile seawall of approximately 200'The existing seawall was designed with tie backs that extended into the existing building.The existing concrete walkway between the building and seawoll had significant settlement and had a segment that collapsed. BCC Engineering was requested to assess the existing conditions and upon our assessment from land and water,it was determined that the soil beneath the walkway had completely washed away.Ihe existing steel sheet pile had completely weathered away along the waterline for the entire length of the seawall which allowed for washout of the soil.Damage to the existing building wall was also encountered.Based on our field assessment and report,it was recommended a new seowall be immediately constructed. BCC provided structural design,construction administration,and CEl services for a new king pile seawall.The seawall was installed immediately in front of the exist seawall and had a maximum pile depth of 63'The seawall was constructed with additional,sacrificial steel thickness,and additional coatings for increased service life. Agency Name:City of Miami Beach Agency Contract:RFQ No.2014-346-YG /Resolution No.2015-29068 Agency Contact:David Gomez ]305-673-7071 ]Dovidgomez@miamibeachfl.gov BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2017-2018 RELEVANCY [CY or MAM1EACH PROJECT [ RESILIENCY COASTAL EXPOSURE INSPECTION A5$ESSMENI CONSTRUCTABIITY .OST ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION Project Description This project is a task work order for the ongoing City of Miami Beach Professional Architectural and Engineering Services (A&E)in specialized categories on an "as needed-basis"Contract. The project involves civil engineering services associated with on-site modifications caused by the replacement of the seawalls throughout the City.New seawalls will replace existing seawalls in bad structural condition.The structural system will consist in prefabricated concrete panels and precast piles.Seawall locations include. •Western terminus of 13th Street (Lennox]at Biscayne Bay •Northern terminus of Jefferson Street at Dade (Collins)Canal •Northern terminus of Rue Notre Dame at Normandy Waterway •Northern terminus of Irouville Esplanade at Normandy Waterway •Northern terminus of Bonito Drive at Indian Creek •Southern terminus of Gorden Avenue at Biscayne Waterway •Northern terminus of Indian Creek Drive at Indian Creek. Agency Name:City of Miami Beach Agency Contract:RFQ No.2014-346-YG /Resolution No.2015-29068 Agency Contact:Giancarlo Peno,PE ]305-673-7490 ]GiancarloPeno@miamibeochfl.gov BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2020 -Ongoing MIAMIBEACH RELEVANCY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROJECT RESILIENCY COASTAL EXPOSURE STREET TERMINUS SEAWALLS INSPECTION/ASSESSMENT INNOVATIVE MATERIALS CONSTRUCTABIITY CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION 0 MIAMI BEACH 3IIE±II).±LIE±83IL3MIIILLSIIILILI0±III 333/92 ho <, TAB 2 EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONTJ EI0)EMI LI'ALLI 3II $#0/EL4$9J33 1085)0I\00) Pinellas &Hillsborough Counties,FL III IA 833/0$9332%4I. Miami-Dade County,F Project Description This high-profile design-build project includes the design and construction of the replacement for the existing NB 1-275 (SR 93)Howard Frankland Bridge over Old Tompo Boy and removal of the existing Northbound 1960's existing bridge.The project undertakes major additions and changes to the existing roadway by adding express lanes,improving roadways,enhancing safety,adding capacity,mobility,and accommodating future light roil.The new bridge is over 3 mi long,located in a highly sensitive environment,subject to vessel collision forces,and has unique soil conditions. The following ore some highlights of the new bridge structure: l,OOO LF of seawall comprised of cantilevered and anchored sheet pile,as well as anchored king-pile systems. •Largest bridge in the state of Florida with over 2.6 mi.square feet of bridge deck are0 •113 spans consisting of 1726 Florido-I beams totaling over 241,000 LF 44 hammerhead piers for the high-level spans,&180 multi-column piers for the low-level spans 3006 -30-inch square prestressed concrete piles with varying lengths of 62 f1to 220 f Designed for vessel collision forces up to 2000 kips Four full span highly aesthetic scenic overlooks to enhance pedestrian experience •Pier mounted overhead sign structures •Includes two single-span shared use path bridges,o 1040 h long elevated walkway structure,temporary and permanent walls,overhead sign structures,and toll facilities. Agency Name:Florido Department of Transportation District 7 Agency Contract:E7R 10 Agency Contact:Liz Winters ]813-849-7509 ]Elizabeth.winters@dot.state.fl.us BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2020 lo 2025 (Est.) RELEVANCY RESILIENCY SEA LEVEL RISE COASTAL LOCATION ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS INNOVATIVE MATERIALS SUPPORTS CRITICAL TRANSPORTATION FACILITY DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PUBIIC INVOLVEMENT Project Description The scope of services for this project encompassed planning,public engagement,design, and post-design support for developing comprehensive construction plans across six distinct County-owned parcels.These plans contribute to the seamless expansion of the Miami River Greenway Network.Specifically,the project involved creating o 23'-0"wide pedestrian/ bicycle shared river-walk with integrated lighting,landscaping,and hardscape features like benches and trash receptacles.Additionally,it entailed seawall design,drainage considerations, traffic management,utility assessments,geotechnical analysis,lighting strategies,permit acquisition,cost estimation,detailed landscape architecture,and all other necessary elements for a fully realized project.BCC staff designed sheet pile walls to creote sidewalks along River, coordinated sheet pile with the existing Metromover and Metrorail piers and existing FPL utilities. Agency Name:Miami-Dode County Deportment of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) Agency Contract:E07-PW-04GOB Agency Contact:Jim Sumisloski ]305-375-2724 ]Jim.Sumislaski@kimley-horn.com BCC Role:Subconsultant Term of Engagement:2014 -2019 RELEVANCY I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROJECT I RESILIENCY SEA LEVEL RISE COASTAL LOCATION ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING URBAN SETTING DESIGN CONSTRUCTION MIAMI BEACH @ MIAMI BEACH 3I0LIE±III98IE3s8 3LILIES.IIIIIEEE:ILESJ7r29V30093/333/V3 ••-•Thre. TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONT.J #4lIII0)$358#I013 3[SIB}-3III4+.III #JAL RABB.AIII) Miami-Dade County,FL $I3\9ID//RISE MIIAIE RIZAKI«LL.IE TOSI SIT Project Description This $559 million-dollar DB project,known as Palmetto Section 5,consisted of the reconstruction of one of the busiest interchanges in Florido.With over 500,000 vehicles traversing the facility on a daily basis,it took skilled coordination and oversight to build this four-level system-to- system interchange consisting of 47 bridges,including four segmental directional flyover ramps. This project was the last and largest section of the Palmetto Expressway Improvement Program [Entire program wos l?Sections].Ihe primary objective oh the project was to increase copacity along the Palmetto Expressway (SR 826]and the Dolphin Expressway (SR 836)while enhancing existing ramp connections and creating connections that did not exist before. BCC was the Engineer of Record responsible for developing the structural design for the project, which included 4/new bridge structures as well as an extensive amount ot permanent and temporary walls,and overhead sign structures.Structural improvements included. •2,500 LF of new bulkhead well including both cantilevered ond anchored sheet pile walls for the realignment of the Northline Canal.Anchoring system was made up of a concrete deodmon slob lied with steel rods •MSE Walls up to 40 feet in height,and temporary walls 4 Segmental flyover Bridges,4 Steel Plate Girder Bridges &39 Florido-I Beam Bridges Over 40 overhead sign structures BCC was the Lead Designer for this project,and provided design services for Structures, Highwoy,Signing &Pavement Markings,I,Lighting,Drainage,&Environmental Permitting Agency Name:Florida Department of Transportation District 6 Agency Contract:E6F6 l Agency Contact:Mario Cabrero,PE [305-640-7445 \Mario.cabrera@dot.state.fl.us BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2009-2016 RELEVANCYIMIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROJEC C COMPLEX HYDRAULIC ASPECTS MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE HIE-BAK WAUS ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIIN COORDINATION DE SIGN CONSTRUCTON PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Project Description The project encompassed the complete reconstruction of SR 997,encompassing Krome Avenue and SW 177 Avenue,stretches from just south of Kendall Drive to north of Tamiami Trail.This comprehensive project involved expanding the existing two-lane undivided segment into a divided four-lane thoroughfare.Additionally,enhancements included widening the existing bridge located just north of Tamiami Trail to align with the typical section north of the Trail.As pant of the structures scope of wokr,BCC oversaw the design of two bulkhead walls featuring o king pile system. Agency Name:Miami-Dode County Deportment of Transportation &Public Works Agency Contract:C8N45 Agency Contact:Adriano Monzonares,PE I 305-470-5283 I Adriana.manzanores@dot.state.flus BCC Role:Prime Consultant Term of Engagement:2007-2009 MIAMI BEACH RELEVANCY MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROJECT HYDRAULICS/SCOUR MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE TIE-BACK WALLS ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING COORDINATION DESIGN CONSTRUCTION o MIAMI BEACH 3III:±II9 $III±8 3LIS±IIIILSII)LIB;I be~. 33 ·9 3)3 33.y 2.2 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART SB89,SILL)NJ Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE (BCC)den Bob Forand,PE,FRSE (BCC)de Gus Llanos,PE (BCC) Cory Salzano,PE (BCC)er Richard Pick,PE (BCC)er Chuan Chen,PE (BCC) GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) SungRyong Han (BCC)de Jean Pierre Valle,EI,CFM (BCC) Carlos Marales (BCC) Mohammad Shokri,PhD (BCC) SU77IM eIIII COASTAL ENGINEERING0ND)UTILITY COORDINATIONCC) Mark Gosselin,PhD,PE icardo "Rick"Duran,CGC Michael Trodnak," =r al 1-- ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (MLA) Dylan Larson,SPWS,CEPr William Mohler,PWS,CA GE0TECHNICAL 6CES) BCC BCC Engineering,LLC GCES GCES Engineering Services,LLC MLA Miller,Legg &Associates,Inc.INT INTERA,Inc. MGV Manuel G.Vera &Associates,Inc.MRG Media Relations Group,LLC SURVEYINGMGV) Alejandro Montenegro,PE Manry Vera Jr,PSM d ,,L Sowers,PSM Carlos Alonso,PS SUBSURFACE UTILITYENGINEERINGMGV) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENTMRG) Dayana Sanjurjo Isela Carmial be wLetcc ,M4.S.VEA &ASSOCIATES «a ~SEAWALL EXPERIENCE INTERA Do Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSEl 19 Victor H.Herrera,PE 2] Daniel Raymat,PE 24 William "Bil"Junkin,PE 49 Michael Krecic,PE 30 Bob Forand,PE,FRS~-i-_2~-, Gus llanos,PE 16 Cory Salzano,PE 15 Richard Pick,PE 9 Chuan Chen,PE 6 SungRyong Han 30 Jean Pierre Valle,El,CFM 8 Mark Gosselin,PhD,PE 34---Michael Trudnak,PE 28 Alejandro Montenegro,PE 34 Manny Vera Jr.,PSM _40 Carlos Alonso,PSM 27----Ricardo "Rick"Duron,CGC 22 Dylan Larson,SPWS,CEP 30 William Mohler,PWS,CA 16 Mark Sowers,PSM 36 Carlos Morales 25 Mohammad Shokri,PhD 11 Dayana Sanjurjo Isela Carmiol sgeenng MLAMIBEACH 19»l co ««sos+±IIIEEE#IIJ SJ8 YU)2III5II)I)IIJ 1 JI} »9!1Sn»3924-234-3) bcengineIng FIRM BC C Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 19 EDUCATION M S Civil Engineering, 2008,University of M iami BS Civil Engineering, 2007,University of M iami REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer Florida N o.74647,2012 Texas N o.141819,202 Special Inspector N o. 74647,2021 CHRISTIAN AQUINO,PE,SI,FRSE PROJECT MANAGER,STRUCTURES ENGINEER M r.Aquino has l9 year s of experience and currently serves as Director of the Building Structures Depar tment.During this time,He has been involved in design development through co nstruction administra tion for a var iety of pro ject types in the private and public sector throughout Florida such as residential (single and multi-fa mily),commercial,mixed-use,waste/wastewater treatment, municipal,institutional,par ks and recreation,and highway (sign structures and bridges).Mr.Aquino also has experience in repair and rehabilitation projects using conventional and innovative solutions. His M aster's thesis focused on co ncrete rehabilitation of damaged and structura lly deficient concrete bridge girders using carbon fiber.M r.Aquino has also performed in-situ load tests on balconies to determine any structural deficiencies and repair needs. REL EVANT EXPERIENCE SEAWALL REPLACEMENT AT 48TH ST AND 29TH ST I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Th is pro ject w as completed as par t of BCC's Professional A&E Services Agreements with the City of M iami Beach.The replacements will consist of new preca st panel and pile seawalls at 48th St and N orth Bay Rd (±60'and 29th St and Flamingo Dr (±40').BCC is also providing permitting services (M B Building Dept.,SFW M D and the MDC RER),a benthic survey and geotechnical report for each seaw all (pro vided by the supporting subconsultant team),structural and civil engineering services for the pro ject.Services also include bidding support,construction administration support and project closeout services. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES -STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I BCC was tasked with a var iety of assignments, including planning,design,bidding,and construction administration for the Fleet Management Facility on Terminal Island.The project involved assessing and addressing severa l issues,such as a deteriorated steel sheet pile seaw all,collapsed co ncrete walkway,and damaged building wall.After determining that the existing seaw all had weathered away,leading to soil washout,BCC recommended and implemented the construction of a new king pile seawall.This new seawall,installed immediately in front of the old one,featured increased durability with sacrificial steel thickness and coatings for a longer service life. FLEET MANAGEMENT SEAWALL ASSESSMENT &REPAIR I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Th e Fleet M anagement Facility on Terminal Island had a 200-foot steel sheet pile seawall next to G overn ment Cut,with tie backs into the building.The seawall had a deteriorated co ncrete walkway and settlement issues.BCC Engineering assessed the site,finding washed-away soil under the walkway and w eathered sheet piles ca using soil was hout and building wall damage.They recommended and built a new king pile seaw all in front of the old one,with a maximum depth of 63 feet. SEAWALL MASTER PLAN (RESILIENCY STUDY)I CITY OF FT.LAUDERDALE I FT.LAUDERDALE,FL I DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER I Th e City ow ns appro ximately 4.3 miles of seawall structures and 2.0 miles of natural banks.Th is task work order required the assessment of the co mprehensive needs of these structures and banks,and development of a Seawall Master Plan.Th e Plan consisted of individual assessment reports fo r each co mponent,as well as a report summar izing the findings and recommendations to included feas ible solutions,impacts,and co st estimates.Seawall assessments included inspection of existing structures (above and below water),and recommendations for the seawall infrastructure in M IAM I BEAC H «oooo EIIEERII)8II5 HD)SJ)IL3 II)1)I)I8LILI3 J9!Iff y 2924-234-3/9 be need of rehabilitation or replacement.The Plan also addressed potential structural modifications and bank needs to address the challenges associated with Sea Level Rise (SLR).BCC completed the assignment on an aggressive four-month schedule in order to have the report finalized so projects could be budgeted for the Fiscal Year. MIAMI RIVER GREENWAYS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS IDTPWJ I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FL I PROJECT ENGINEER I Scope of services included planning, public involvement,design,and post-design services in the preparation of complete construction plans for six separately County-owned parcels which will provide continuity to the Miami River Greenway Network.The project included the construction of a 23'-0"wide pedestrian/bicycle shared use river-walk,including lighting,landscaping,and hardscape elements such as benches and trash receptacles.The project also included seawall design,drainage,maintenance of traffic, utility impacts,geotechnical,lighting,permits,cost estimates, landscape architecture details,and all of the necessary incidental items for a complete project. KEV WEST BIGHT SEAWALL I CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES I KEY WEST, FL I PROJECT MANAGER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Project Manager and Engineer-of-Record responsible for inspections and report preparations.Project consisted of performing a Structural Condition Assessment of approximately 1,800 linear feet of the existing seawall in the Historic Seaport at Key West Bight and provide repair recommendations. MIAMI WOMAN'S CLUB SEAWALL AND BA'WALK (PROJECT NO.8-30731) -MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT I CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTMENT DF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM I MIAMI,FL I PROJECT ENGINEER I These services were provided under BC C's Continuing Services Contract with the City of Miami.The project involved seawall improvements and the construction of a new walkway behind the Miami Woman's Club.The structural work included designing an elevated concrete walkway connecting the Doubletree Hotel and Margaret Pace Park,supported by bay floor piles.Services encompassed project management, engineering analysis,and plan preparation for the seawall improvements and walkway construction,including seawall reconstruction,drainage design,coordination with utilities, pedestrian lighting,and installation of hardscape elements. SR 826/SR 836 NORTHLINE CANAL BULKHEAD WALLS -SECTION 5 DESIGN- BUILD I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I PROJECT ENGINEER I This project includes the reconstruction of SR 826 from south of Flagler Street to north of NW 12th Street and SR MIAMI BEACH CHRISTIAN AQUINO,PE.,SI,FRSE PROJECT MANAGER,STRUCTURES ENGINEER 836 from east of NW 87th Avenue to west of 57th Avenue.The SR 826/SR 836 Interchange is a four-level System-to-System Interchange with direct connectors that provide for traffic movements in all directions between the two expressways. The project also includes the reconstruction of two service interchanges,the reconstruction of NW 12th Street and the realignment of the North Line Canal.The project includes 47 new bridge structures (four Concrete Segmental Flyovers, seven Steel Plate Girder,and 36 FIB)as well as an extensive amount of permanent and temporary walls,and sign structures. Responsibilities included the design of2]Bridges (19-Florida-l Beam (FIB)Bridges -Category l and 2-Steel Plate Girder Bridges -Category 2),MSE walls up to 40 feet in height, temporary walls,anchored bulkhead walls for the realignment of the Northline Canal,and over 40 overhead sign structures. The Florida-I Beam (FIB)bridges utilized all different types of Florida-I Beam sizes and bridges consisting of single span and multi-span bridges with span lengths varying between 71 feet to 170 feet Several bridges are complete replacements of the existing bridges and required phased construction. MIAMI BEACH CITYWIDE BRIDGE ASSESSMENT I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH.FL I PROJECT MANAGER &EOR I BCC was contracted to develop an assessment report,repair forecasts,and budgets for nineteen (19)bridges throughout the City that may require repair.The bridges identified have sufficiency ratings greater than 70 and are not required to undergo extensive rehabilitation. The assessment report developed will help facilitate the City in prioritizing repairs and create a l0-year capital plan to fund the rehabilitation projects. MIAMI BEACH LUMMUS PARK I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH. FL I PROJECT MANAGER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I BCC provided structural design services to upgrade the wellness circuit in Lummus Park.The equipment consists of a 20-foot steel container.Since the site is in a historic district,a submittal of the proposed work was submitted to the Historical Preservation Board as required Upon approval from the Historical Preservation Board,BCC prepared,signed and sealed calculations demonstrating whether the proposed equipment required foundations/soil anchors to resist Category 5 wind loads.Structural plans and details for foundations/soil anchors a wind calculation that illustrated stability of the equipment was submitted for building department review and approval. «roar EIIEERIIr $JI3 HJ3III.II I5 lJ LIJJ 3tty JO!IHfSr04 2924-234-3)D) FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 21 EDUCATION BS in Civil Engineering, 2004,Florida State University REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Engineer, Florida N o.71164,2010 Pro fessional Engineer, Alabam a N o.30849, 2009 Pro fessional Engineer, Georgia N o.047786, 2021 Professional Engineer, Texas N o.142487,2021 Professional Engineer, Puerto Rico N o.28402, 2021 VICTOR H.HERRERA,PE PRIN CIPAL-IN -CHARG E M r.Herrera has 2l years of combined experience in construction management and civil engineering design.He has experience in coastal design,land development,utility design,and progra m management/ow ner's representative,fo r both public and privately held projects.In these roles, Victor has been responsible for contract management,sub-consultant/contractor oversight,project scheduling,regulatory compliance and permitting,and design-build management. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE FDEP SEAWALL ARMORING PROGRAM I FDEP I STATEWIOE,FL I PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I BCC personnel served in the ca pacity of Staff Augmentation with the Florida Depar tment of Environmental Protection (FD EP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems.In this ca pacity,staff was responsible regulatory review of all applica tions that involved ar moring (seawall,revetments,geotubes,and other rigid co astal struct ures).Additional responsibilities consisted of: •Coordinating with local,state,and federa l environmental agencies,as well as project professionals in processing permits. •Review ing and issuing permits for co nstruction seawar d of the Coastal Construction Control Line (C C C L). •Pro viding impact assessments for pro posed activities and long-term effects on the beach/dune system. •M onitoring coastal construction and related activities in five co unties (Volusia,Flagler,St.Johns, Duval,and Nassau). •Pro viding site inspections for existing and proposed construction sites. •Review ing all armoring applications statewide,including seawalls,revetments,geotubes,and all other rigid coastal structures. •Providing emergency assistance to W alton County following Hurrica ne Dennis to provide damage assessment as well as approach strategy for reconstruction. •Coordinating with Florida Fish and W ildlife Conservation Commission,U.S.Fish and Wildlife, and the State of Florida on handling regulatory issues with the construction of rigid structures in the Panhandle. NORTH BAY VILLAGE STORMWATER MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT I NORTH BAY VILLAGE,FL I NORTH BAY VILLAGE, FL I PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I Th e Village is a coastal municipality in Miami-Dade County,surrounded by the Bisca yne Bay Aquatic Preserve.It comprises three man-made islands:North Bay Island, Har bour Island,and Treasure Island,with a population of around 9,10 0 residents.The Village faces challenges such as rising sea levels,groundwater,and rainfall,as well as threats from hurricanes. BC C is developing a comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SW MP)to protect infrastructure, impro ve stormw ater quality,and increase community resilience,including assessing the existing system,analyzing future co nditions,and developing a prioritized capital improvement plan and funding alternatives. CITY OF DORAL -VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT I CITY OF DORAL I DORAL,FL I PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I As part of this Service O rder,BCC Engineering,LLC.(BCC)will support the City of Doral (City)in completing the M IAM I BEACH 0 «rs»sos EI.IEE±III0 E.I3 I)3AIL3MIU LI)II)I1IE3 ¥0!1H f ±024-234-31 Vulnera bility Assessm ent [VA),per s.380.093,FS.,w hich will identify ar eas w ithin the City most susceptible to damage from an increase in sea-level and groundw ater rise.Th is Service O rder w ill be an integral par t of the Continuing Pro fessional Engineering Services Agreement (RFQ N o.2019-05)betw een the City and BC C. PARKS BONO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES I CITY OF DORAL I DORAL, FL I PRE-CONSTRUCTION DIRECTOR I BC C is part of the Pro gram M anagem ent Team fo r the City of Dora l Par ks Bond Progra m, funded by a $150 million Genera l O bligation Par ks Bond. Th e bond supports pro jects including par k construction,green spaces,sports fields,play ar eas,an aquatic facility,community center,cultura l am enities,and safety features acro ss var ious parks .M r.Herrera ,as pre-construction director,oversees RFO s,RFPs,and negotiations w ith consultants/contra ctors. He has finalized a $20M CM @Risk G M P fo r the first phase of the Bond's signature project and is managing the solicitation for a $5M Pedestrian Bridge.BC C pro vides pre-construct ion services,pro ject managem ent,and coordination for the 8 project s slated for construction. DORAL CULTURAL ARTS CENTER I CITY OF DORAL I DORAL,FL I PRINCIPAL- IN-CHARGE I Th e building w ill include a lar ge art gallery space, a flexible m ulti-purpose room,multiple outdoor courtyar ds,a ca tering ar ea,dedica ted vehicular dro p-off ar ea and public restroom s.Th e pro ject w ill enhance the existing par k site am enities w ith addition of an accessible ro oftop plaza,an amphitheater,and public gar den spaces.Provided pro ject adm inistration services,including design and construction meetings,genera l project coordination,documentation of all aspect of the project,perfo rmed site inspections,maintained meeting notes,and monitored pro ject progress. CITY OF MIAMI -DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE FOR REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION OF CITYWIDE ROADS I CITY OF MIAMI I MIAMI,FL I PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I Th is City of M iami project includes,but is not limited to,developing a Design Criteria Package that addresses drainage im provem ents,stormw ater modeling, reconstruct ion,milling and resurfacing,sidew alks,America ns w ith Disabilities Act (ADA)co m pliant ra mps,curbs and/or gutters,pavement markings and striping,roadw ay signage, utility coordination,and lim ited landscaping services.Th e scope of services also includes surveying,geotechnical investigations and testing,and related services necessar y for the prepar ation of the Design Criteria Package for a var iety of different streets and intersections located throughout the City of M iami that are currently in very poor conditions and require reconstruction MIAMI BEACH VICTOR H.HERRERA,PE PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE and/or repairs.As principal,Victor is responsible for the overall execution of the pro ject. VILLAGE OF KEV BISCAYNE -CONTINUING ARCHITECTURAL 6 ENGINEERING SERVICES I VILLAGE OF KEV BISCAYNE I KEV BISCAYNE,FL I PRINCIPAL-IN- CHARGE I BCC was involved in coordinating with the Village of Key Biscayne,M iami-Dade County,M iami-Dade Transit,and other relevant entities to gather available existing data to be evaluated as par t of the design of the impro vements including (As-Built Plans,Right-of-way Maps,Dra inage maps,etc.). BCC w as involved in Roadw ay Design,Dra inage Evaluation, Signing &Mar king,Signalization,Lighting and conducted field review s to visually assess existing conditions,confirm measurements and co nstraints to account fo r in the design of the improvements. CRANDON BLVD IMPROVEMENTS TWO 1 I VILLAGE OF KEV BISCAYNE I VILLAGE OF KEV BISCAYNE I PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I Cra ndon Boulevard is a fo ur-lane divided roadway with 30 mph posted speed limit.The corridor is severely co ngested at several intersections along the corridor.W hile the list of reco mmended impro vements is substantial,the Village of Key Biscayne desires to address improvements in phases such as design of an exclusive right turn lane and extension of left-turn lane at a couple of intersections along Cra ndon Boulevar d.Along with that,engineering evaluation and analysis was performed to review access restriction at a roundabout and an unsignalized intersection,review new entrance to the condominium complex, evaluation of crossw alk removal and corridor level speed limit reduction. PALMETTO ISLAND ROADWAY 6 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SW 70TH AVE BETWEEN SW 128TH STREET TO SW 133RD STREET I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I PINECREST,FL I PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE I BCC Engineering is handling professional engineering services for roadw ay and dra inage impro vements along SW 70th Ave. betw een SW 128th St.to SW 133rd St.Th eir work includes design,permitting,and post-design services,with a focus on incorpora ting sea-level and groundwater projections from the 2015 Stormw ater M aster Plan.Th is plan utilized pro jections from the 2015 Southeast Florida Climate Compact and the 2014 Hydro logic Conditions in urban Miami-Dade County to predict gro undw ater levels.Th e project also involves refining the co nceptual design to improve stormwater runoff collection, avoid utility conflicts,determine exfiltration trench lengths,and evaluate backflow preventers fo r the C-100 Canal stages. assoc :NIIIEERII5S±II +UJSZIII3 JIU I'II#ELIE3 39±/Hr31104 2924-234-3)D) be FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 24 EDUCATION BS in Civil Engineering, 2000,Florida Intern ational University REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Engineer, Florida N o.63111 ,2005 Professional Engineer, Georgia N o.043845, 2018 Professional Engineer, South Carolina No. 36833,2019 Pro fessional Engineer, Texas N o.134921,2019 DANIEL RAVMAT,PE Q UALITY ASSURAN CE M ANAG ER M r.Raymat has 24 years of experience as a Structura l Engineer.During which time,he has specialized in final design,plans production and load ratings for FO OT structure pro jects.He has been involved in preliminar y designs during PD&E studies,prepar ation of Bridge Development Reports,final design and prepara tion of specifications,bidding,and construction phase services. His bridge design experience encompasses both minor and major bridge structures,including short span flat slab bridges,AASHTO girder and Florida-I Beam (FIB)bridges,Florida U-Beam bridges, and continuous steel plate I-girder and steel plate box girder bridges.He has served as Engineer- of-Reco rd on over 60 bridges and has served as the Lead Structures Engineer on over $1.4 billion of major design-build pro jects.His design experience also includes design of retaining walls,sign structures,signal structures and box culverts. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE F-275 HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE I FOOT DISTRICT 71 TAMPA,FL I LEAD STRUCTURES ENGINEER I The primary goal of this project is to design and construct the replacement for the existing NB 1-275 (SR 93) How ard Fra nkland Bridge over O ld Ta mpa Bay in Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties and remove the existing Northbound 1960's exiting bridge.The Project undertakes major additions and changes to the existing roadw ay system by adding express lanes,improving existing roadways,enhancing safety,adding capacity and mobility,and accommodating future light rail.The new bridge will be over 15,000 ft long,with 143-ft spans matching the pier locations of the 1990's bridge,enhancing boater safety and aesthetics of the bridge structures.As an added value,our design reconfigures the scenic overlooks making them 4.5 times lar ger than the RFP Concept providing significantly enlarged shaded seating area and refuge for maintenance vehicles,as well as an uniform look for all the piers across the bridge,this not only enhances the aesthetics,but also improves the safety of the boaters navigating. MIAMI RIVER GREENWAYS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS IDTPWI I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER I Sco pe of services included planning,public involvement, design,and post-design services in the prepar ation of co mplete construction plans for six separately County-ow ned par cels which will provide co ntinuity to the M iami River Greenway Network.The project included the co nstruction of a 23'-0"wide pedestrian/bicycle shared use river-walk,including lighting,landscaping,and hardscape elements such as benches and trash receptacles.The project also included seawall design,dra inage,maintenance of traffic,utility impacts,geotechnical,lighting, permits,cost estimates,landscape architecture details,and all of the necessar y incidental items for a co mplete project. SR A 1 A SOUTH ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD I FOOT DISTRICT 61 MONROE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER I Design Engineer for approximately 1000 feet of new seawall along SR A 1 A (South Roosevelt Boulevar d) in Key W est,Florida.Th e preferred alternative based on co nstructability issues and mitigation of enviro nmental impacts was a ca ntilevered steel sheet pile wall.W all Heights exceeded fifteen feet in height,and the wall was designed for wave impact forces and scour associated with different storm events.Th e project also included the removal and reconstruction of a concrete par apet along an existing bridge as well as the extension of an existing box culvert. M IA M I BEAC H «coo+EIIEIJJSIIVE3 7)III3MIU LIIV SELIE; 30±4Hf03y 294-234-34D9 NW 87TH AVENUE OVER MIAMI CANAL I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Engineer-of-Record for the design of a new continuous three span flat slab bridge over the Miami Canal.Overall bridge length is 145'-0"with spans of 44'-7",55'-9"and 44'-7".The bridge is 13O-6" wide with a skew of 49°12'15"measured from the baseline. The bridge design included curved returns for heavy truck m ovements between Okeechobee Road and South River Drive.Th e bulkhead w all consists of an anchored steel sheet pile w all designed to provide SFWMD maintenance access to the canal. M-PATH KENDALL BULKHEAD WALLS ALONG SNAPPER CREEK CANAL I CLIENT I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Engineer- of-Reco rd fo r the design of tw o bulkhead w alls along the Snapper Cre ek Canal.Th e Snapper Creek Canal runs between a l4-story apar tm ent building and a M etrora il par king gar age building.Th e appro xim ate lengths of the bulkheads ar e 482 feet and 380 feet and shall pro vide for a pedestrian w alkw ay along both sides of the ca nal fo r the residents.Th e bulkheads consist of cantilevered sheet pile w alls w ith a cast in place ca p. Th e cast in place cap w as designed to overhang the sheet pile w alls 2 feet to 6 feet. SR 826 (PALMETTO EXPRESSWAY]IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM,SECTION 5-DESIGN-BUILD I FOOT DISTRICT 61 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Th is project includes the reco nstruct ion of SR 826 from south of Flagler Street to north of N W 12#h Street and SR 836 fro m east of N W 87th Avenue to w est of 57th Avenue.Th e SR 826/SR 836 Interchange is a fo ur-level System-to-System Interchange w ith direct connectors that pro vide fo r tra ffic m ovem ents in all directions betw een the tw o expre ssw ays.Th e pro ject also includes the reconstruct ion of tw o service interchanges,the reconstruction of NW 12th Street and the realignm ent of the N or th Line Canal.Th e project includes 47 new bridge structures (fo ur Concrete Segm ental Flyovers,seven Steel Plate G irder, and 36 FIB)as w ell as an extensive amount of permanent and tem porar y w alls,and sign struct ures.Responsibilities included the design of 21 Bridges (19-Florida-I Beam (FIB)Bridges - Category l and 2-Steel Plate G irder Bridges -Category 2), M SE w alls up to 40 feet in height,temporar y w alls,anchored bulkhead w alls for the realignment of the N orthline Canal,and over 40 overhead sign structures.Th e Florida-I Beam (FIB) bridges utilized all different types of Florida-I Beam sizes and bridges consisting of single span and multi-span bridges w ith span lengths var ying betw een 71 feet to 170 feet. M IA M I BEA C H DANIEL RAYMAT,PE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER FIU PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 0VER SR9O/SW 8TH STREET 6 C-4 CANAL WEST OF SW 109TH AVENUE I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I SWEETWATER,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I After the collapse of the pedestrian bridge in 2018,FD O T and FIU have entrusted BC C Engineering to perfo rm the redesign of this w ell needed,high-pro file urban infrastructure project that w ill provide a safe connection betw een FIU Campus and City of Sw eetw ater w ith a "Signature" Pedestrian Bridge over SW 8th Street and Ta m iam i Canal.Th e 290 f long "Signature"bridge consists of a tw o-span (191 '- 99')co ntinuous steel girder cable stayed struct ure supported by single column piers at the ends and 14 8-ft tall dual pylons connect ed by an integra l post-tensioned co ncrete cro ss beam as the intermediate support.Th e dual pylons w ith cables were added as a redundant m eas ure to pro vide additional load ca rrying ca pacity and to enhance the aesthetics of the bridge SR 826/1-75 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT -DESIGN-BUILD I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND ENGINEER- OF-RECORD I Project includes the addition of approxim ately l3 miles of Express Lanes to be co nstruct ed -l O miles along the SR 826 (Palm etto Expressw ay)and three miles on 1-75 (SR 93) Th e im pro vem ents co nsist of w idening both SR 826 and 1-75, reconstruction on SR 826,new co nstruction in the median of 1-75,and an elevated connect ion from the Express Lanes on SR 826 to the Express Lanes on 1-75.Structura l impro vements include l4 bridge w idenings (America n A ssociation of State Highw ay and Tra nsportation O ffi cials (AA SHTO )Beams and steel girders),four new bridges,retaining w alls,88 sign struct ures,and noise bar rier w alls.Th e Express Lanes co nnect ion betw een SR 826 and 1-75 consists of a fo ur-span continuous steel box girder bridge w ith m ultiple steel integra l pier caps (four spans at 177'-0",271'-9",214 '-6"and 182'- 0").Th e rem aining three new bridges consist of FIBs,tw o of w hich are tw o spans w ith piers fo unded on spread footings. SR 836/1-395 FROM WEST OF 1-95 TO MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY BRIDGE I CLIENT I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER I BCC is supporting FDO T in the co ncept developm ent,procurem ent, and design phases of the project,including prepar ing the prelim inar y geom etric design for the entire 1-395 co rridor reco nstruction.Th e project aim s to improve mainline operations, reduce congestion on surface streets,and enhance access to the Performing A rts Center and dow ntow n M iami.BC C is also review ing roadw ay,traffi c control,signing,pavem ent m ar king, and signalization plans subm itted by the Designers on behalf of the Depar tment. «s o ENI8IIEE7III9 E3JI31 YU±I'III5 A/I)LIU 3I)LIE3 30!Hr!n04 3924-2 34-3)0 be engineering FIRM BC C Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 49 EDUCATION BS in Civil Engineering, 1975,Louisiana State University REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer, Florida N o.43707 1990 Professional Engineer, G eorgia N o.0472 12, 2021 Professional Engineer, Louisiana N o.18313, 1979 Professional Engineer, Texas N o.1410 27,2021 Professional Engineer, Structural Engineer G eorgia N o.0011 92, 2021 WILLIAM "BILL"JUNKIN,PE QUALITY CONTROL STRUCTURES After completing his undergraduate engineering studies at Louisiana State University in 1975,Mr. Junkin began his career at International Paper Company,working on a major industrial wastewater treatment facility.He later joined the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development as a bridge design engineer,where he was involved in designing many major fixed and movable bridges In 1981,he moved to the private sector,co ntinuing to work on bridge design and management of tra nsportation projects in Louisiana and Flor ida.M r.Junkin joined GLF Construction in 2009,where he managed engineering activities for permanent and temporar y works,including the design of bridges and marine projects.Thro ughout his car eer,M r.Junkin has been extensively involved in designing various types of bridge superstructures and substructures,as well as co nducting related bridge and tra nsportation act ivities such as vessel collision studies,scour studies,and bridge inspections RELEVANT EXPERIENCE TERMINAL ISLAND SEAWALL I KEARNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY I MIAMI-DADE,FL I STRUCTURAL 0A/QC I This project co nsisted of 1300 linear feet of new seawall at Terminal Island.BCC provided the design of the seaw all and plan pro ductions suitable for the building department. 1-275 HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE I FOOT DISTRICT 71 TAMPA,FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL &BRIDGE ENGINEER;MARINE BULKHEAD 0ESIGN G PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DESIGN,BRIDGE FOUNDATION DESIGN I At the time of award,this project w as the lar gest District 7 design-build pro ject ever let for construction and the largest bridge ever co nstructed in the state of Florida.Th e primar y goal of this project is to design and construct the replacement for the existing NB 1-275 (SR93)Howar d Frankland Bridge over Old Ta mpa Bay in Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties and remove the existing Northbound 1960's exiting bridge.The Project undertakes major additions and changes to the existing roadway system by adding express lanes, improving existing roadw ays,enhancing safety,adding capacity and mobility,and acco mmodating future light rail.Th e new bridge will be over 15,000 f long,with 143-ft spans matching the pier loca tions of the 1990's bridge,enhancing boater safety and aesthetics of the bridge structures.As an added value,our design reco nfigures the scenic overlooks making them 4.5 times larger than the RFP Concept pro viding significantly enlar ged shaded seating area and refuge for maintenance vehicles, as well as an uniform look for all the piers acro ss the bridge,this not only enhances the aesthetics,but also impro ves the safety of the boaters navigating. CITY-WIDE BRIDGE REHABILITATION SERVICES TASK WORK ORDER NO.1-B8RIDGE NO.175760 AZINGER WAY OVER MAIN CANAL B LOAD RATING EVALUATION,21-72AO I CITY OF SARASOTA I SARASOTA,FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER; QC REVIEWER I Th is Ta sk W ork O rder involved the bridge serving as sole access to the Bobby Jones Golf Club.Th e bridge is a 70-fo ot long,2-span,concrete slab unit bridge constructed in 1976.It is supported by pile abutments and an intermediate pile bent located in the center of the ca nal.The bridge has a Sufficiency Rating 6f 50.9,a Health Index of 98.64,and is Functionally Obsolete.The bridge supports tw o lanes of tra ffic,a sidewalk,and several utilities.The bridge was posted for 28 To ns,and the golf course was undergoing a major improvement project that would subject the bridge to increased truck traffic for a period of several months.As a result,the City requested that BCC evaluate the existing load rating,and take posting avoidance measures if possible.BCC evaluated the existing load rating and performed an updated load rating with current criteria for the bridge M IAM I BEACH «ossocs ±AI0IEEE»I)$II3 #JILLI8 AIU LIJIIJ SILIS J9!III0»±924-234-/D CITY-WIDE BRIDGE REHABILITATION SERVICES TASK WORK ORDER NO.4 - SERENA ST.PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ANO SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS,21-7240 I CITY OF SARASOTA I SARASOTA,FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Th is pro ject consists of the design of a new pedestrian bridge extending from Serena Street right-of-w ay to the shopping plaza w est of Beneva Road.Th e bridge needs to cro ss over a County-ow ned dra inage ca nal.Sidew alk improvements necessar y to connect the street ta the pedestrian bridge ar e also included.Additional optional services for sidew alk extensions along Serena Street,Bailey Road and along the eastern bank of the dra inage canal west of the shopping plaza w est of Beneva Road w ill also be considered.Sidewalk w ork includes tie-in connections at the new pedestrian bridge over County Canal,including all necessar y har dw ar e to meet A DA requirements.Th e sidew alk analysis shall include back- of-sidew alk pro files,and a matrix of impacts with breakdow n of cost and supporting documentation.Th e scope of work includes roadw ay engineering,dra inage and permitting,a lighting design analysis report,aerial photography,analysis of the existing hydra ulic models,and other services as specified by the City. STATEWIDE STRUCTURES REVIEW I FOOT CENTRAL OFFICES I STATEWIDE, FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER;PLANS REVIEW I BCC will be pro viding Consultant engineering services fo r the design and review of structures statew ide including expertise in the design and review of signature bridges,ra il bridges,segmental co ncrete bridges,ar ch bridges,steel box or steel I-girder superstructures,alternative bridge superstructures,bridges substructures including the effect s from ship impact and scour, ca ble system s,pro jects using innovative products or materials, and bridges w ith unique geotechnical conditions O ther ca pabilities necessar y may include cost saving engineering evaluations,construction cost estimating of complex structures based on bridge production ra tes,innovative material uses, specialized erection equipment,geotechnical foundation evaluations,special designs requiring expertise in finite element analysis,mechanical and electrica l designs for bas cule bridges, specifica tion development,standar ds development,and other activities as assigned by the Depar tment. LAKE ORANGE EXPRESSWAY SEGMENT 2 I CENTRAL FLORIDA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY I LAKE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER;BULKHEAD WALL REVIEW I Th is pro ject includes appro ximately 2 miles of new tolled limited access facility design,along with a new interchange at Lake CR 455,and the design of a portion of CR 455,a new ar terial roadw ay Th e project includes multiple bridges for the interchange and fo r an overpass at Cook Road. M IA M I BEA C H WILLIAM E.JUNKIN,PE,SE QUA LITY CO NTRO L STRUCTURES Design elements include roadway,drainage,structures,tolling, intelligent transportation systems design and signing and pavement markings.The project will be designed to co nform with CFX's Sustainable Design initiative.Coordination with major landowners and Lake County will be required to ensure the design is compatible with this rapidly developing co rridor. Th e 2 bridges over Cook Rd consist of single span FIB-36" superstru ctures supported on 18"PS co ncrete pile bents with M SE walls.The 2 bridges over CR 455 co nsist of single span FIB-78"superstructures supported on 24"PS concrete pile bents with M SE walls. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS -E2O -DTPW-02 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Continuing Services Contract involving miscellaneous Ta sk W ork Order (TW O )assignments including inspections and evaluations,scoping reports,bridge repairs, structura l steel painting,cathodic protection systems,and bridge replacements.Projects also included maintenance of traffic, public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing,pavement mar kings,phased construction,environmental permitting, Specifications,and Technical Special Provisions.Post design services included review of shop drawings,Requests for Information (RFl's),material certification,and on-call support to the contractor during construction. DISTRICTWIDE STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 1 I LEE, CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,MANATEE COUNTIES,FL I SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:PLANS REVIEW,BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN, BRIDGE LOAD RATINGS I Project M anager and Engineer-of-Reco rd for 315 miscellaneous Task W ork Order assignments including plans reviews,Resurfacing,Restoration,and Rehabilitation (3R)evaluations,miscellaneous structure design,and structural design support of District staff. CURTISS PARKWAY OVER MIAMI IC-61 CANAL REPAIR/REHABILITATION AND PAINTING BRIDGE NO.874130 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER OF RECORD I The pro ject involved repairing a historic l 05-foot long,2-span steel W ar ren pony truss bridge built in 1924,originally a movable bob-tail swing span bridge later locked down permanently.Deficiencies included co ating system failure,structural steel corrosion,concrete damage, and settlement of the west approach slab.Repairs included repainting,structural steel repairs,concrete repairs,and pressure grouting of voids under the north approach slab,with an updated load rating. v«roar ±IIElIU 3JI:HUJS:IIIIS MIU LJJIJ JULI; »0!1Hr!HI9y 2924 204-3)) be FIRM BC C Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 26 EDUCATION BS A rchitect ura l Engineering 1996, University of M iam i REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Engineer, Florida N o.58611, 20 0 2 Professional Engineer, Georgia N o.043811 , 2018 Pro fessional Engineer, South Caro lina N o. 36851,2019 BOB FORAND,PE,FRSE STRUCTURES ENGINEER M r.Fora nd has worked in the design and management of structural projects for over 26 year s. Pro jects that Mr.Fora nd has designed or managed include retaining walls,bulkhead walls,overhead sign structures,mast ar m signals,and noise barrier walls,bridge projects to include cast-in-place, precast slab unit,AASHTO beam,and Florida-I Beam (Fl B)bridges,as well as repairs,widenings, rehabilitation,and load ratings.M r.Forand has also designed or managed condensed schedule projects to include Design-Bid,Design-Build,Ta sk W ork Order contracts,and on-ca ll post design contra ctor support services.M r.Fo rand works closely with the project team during all project phases to ensure compliance with design criteria as set forth per client needs and industry standards. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SEAWALL MASTER PLAN (RESILIENCY STUDY)I CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE I FORT LAUDERDALE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Th e City owns approximately 4.3 miles of seawall structures and 2.0 miles of natural banks.Th is task work order required the assessment of the comprehensive needs of these structures and banks,and development of a Seawall M aster Plan.The Plan co nsisted of individual assessment reports for each component,as well as a report summar izing the findings and reco mmendations to included feasible solutions,impacts,and cost estimates.Seawall assessments included inspection of existing structures (above and below water),and reco mmendations for the seaw all infras tructure in need of rehabilitation or replacement.The Plan also addressed potential structural modifications and bank needs to address the challenges associated with Sea Level Rise (SLR).BCC completed the assignment on an aggressive four-month schedule in order to have the report finalized so pro jects co uld be budgeted for the Fiscal Year . Professional Engineer,SR 953 !LEJEUNE ROADJ IMPROVEMENTS I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I DESIGN ENGINEER I Designed Texas N o.134473,2019 and Load Rated tw o tw in continuous four-span ca st-in-place deck bridges supported on pile bents to replace an existing bridge structure.The bridges were at a 45 degree skew and required tieback retained steel sheet pile bents utilizing prestressed pile anchors.Designed two tieback steel sheet pile bulkhead w alls with decorative planter caps.The project also included phase co nstruction for the removal of the existing bridge structure.Designed per the AASHTO Standard Specifications and the FD O T Structural Design G uidelines. PINELLAS COUNTY REST AREA DESIGN-BUILD PHASE II SEAWALL REPAIR I FOOT D 11 PINELLAS COUNTY,FL I FOOT OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT MANAGER I Th is Design-Build project involved reco nstruction of the 1-275 Sunshine Skyw ay Rest Area buildings and sites in M anatee and Pinellas Counties.Improvements to the Rest Area facilities including Rest Area building,fixtures,and equipment,automobile and truck par king areas,interior circulation roadways,site amenities,sidewalks,utility connections and construction of stormw ater management systems.The pro ject also included repair the existing seawall and adding erosion protection along the seawall on the M anatee County end of the Skyway.The Depar tment promoted the use of innovative design concepts,components,details,and construction techniques for this project per Chapter 26 of the FD O T Plans Preparation Manual.As a result,the project included precast construction of the Rest Area buildings and the use of Glass Fiber Reinforcing Bar s fo r the seaw all ca p replacement.BCC served as Owner's Representative for this assignment, pro viding Plans Review services during the design phase,and Cost Savings Initiative (CS!)review and recommendations during the design and construction phase. M IAM I BEACH 0 «nos+:I8IIEE:III)E.III,J 7)ESL)III;JIU LJ)II)LIB3 39±1Ht»n o»292 4 -2 24-3)9 SR 25 US 27 /OKEECHOBEE ROADJ STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS I FOOT DISTRICT 61 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURAL DESIGNER FOR THE BULKHEAD WALL,SIGNING,ANO SIGNAL STRUCTURES ANO THEIR FOUNDATIONS I Project included over two miles of cantilevered steel sheet pile bulkhead wall adjacent to a busy roadway in an area traversed with multiple overhead and buried utilities and drainage structures,and the replacement of the existing 4th Avenue bascule bridge over the Miami Canal with a fixed-span AASHTO beam structure.The project also required the design of three FDOT Standard mas t arms and one FDOT Standard overhead sign structure,the foundations of which were made integral with the bulkhead wall by means of a pile cap and continuous sheeting.The bulkhead wall also incorporated a decorative planter cap and a traffic railing barrier at the edge of pavement. NW 12TH STREET BULKHEAD WALL I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS (DTPW)I MIAMI-DAE COUNTY, FL I DESIGNER OF RECORD I 35-foot high tie-back steel sheet pile bulkhead wall utilizing prestressed concrete pile anchors. Anchor detailing involved preforming and grouting of pile holes required to penetrate buried construction debris indicated by the project borings.The project also involved Post Design services during construction to include rapid-response review of a Contractor-proposed redesign of the anchor system to incorporate steel sheeting in lieu of the prestressed concrete piling.Design was in accordance with the AASHTO Standard Specifications and the FDOT Structural Design Guidelines ST.JOHNS SHIPBUILDING SHIPYARD BULKHEAD WALL IMPROVEMENTS I GliG SHIPPING,LLC I PUTNAM COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I 2,600 feet of anchored steel sheet pile bulkhead wall.The project required special design considerations in order to enable new construction directly adjacent to high-load launch rails while maintaining the operation of those rails as part of a fully functioning in-service shipyard.Post design services included rapid-response support to the contractor during construction and close co ordination with Putnam County to keep construction on-track. DISTRICTWIDOE STRUCTURES REPAIR/REHAB PLANS PREPARATION I FOOT DISTRICT 61 MIAMI-DADE ANO MONROE COUNTIES,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Continuing Services Contract involving miscellaneous Task Work Order (TW O)assignments to date including inspections and evaluations,scoping reports,bridge repairs (bridge deck cracking,spall repairs,slope stabilization.),structural steel painting,cathodic protection systems,safety and geometry improvements,bridge approach improvements,wingwall MIAMI BEACH BOB FORAND.,PE,FRSES STRUCTURES ENGINEER repairs and reconstruction,and scour countermeasures.Projects also included maintenance of traffic,public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing,pavement markings,phased construction,and Technical Special Provisions.Post design services included review of shop drawings,Requests for Information (RFl's),material certification,and on-call support to the contractor during construction.. BRIDGE ENGINEERING DESIGN -CONTINUING SERVICE I FOOT DISTRICT 1 I LEE,CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,MANATEE COUNTIES,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I This is a Continuing Services Task Work Order contract to support the District Structures Maintenance Office in administering the Maintenance program for Category I and II bridges and ancillary structures.The 5-year contract includes technical support services like structural,electrical, and mechanical engineering design,maintenance of traffic, drainage,and geotechnical services for minor and major repairs.Tasks range from routine inspections to emergency response,with services including repair plans,specifications, cost estimates,permitting,post-design support,field reviews, shop drawings,and As-Built Plans preparation.Services also cover coatings evaluation and design for concrete and steel structures,and special investigations like post-tension,wave vulnerability,corrosion,structure deficiencies,and cost-benefit analysis. STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 1 I LEE,CHARLOTTE, OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,MANATEE COUNTIES,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I This is a Continuing services Task Work Order (TWO)based contract involving miscellaneous TWO assignments including plans reviews,Resurfacing,Restoration,and Rehabilitation (3R)evaluations,miscellaneous structure design,and structural design support of District staff.The general objective of this contract is for the consultant to support the District Structures Office in the administration of the Structures program.This is a 5-year continuing services contract involving consultant services required for structural engineering tasks necessary for production of complete construction plans.The Consultant is required to provide any various engineering tasks in support of the District Structures Program.BCC is serving as Prime Consultant providing contract management and structures design services as well as support services such as Roadway, S&PM,and TTCP.This is the second consecutive 5-year cycle that BCC has been entrusted by FDOT to deliver this important contract. «roo d :AIUIIEEE5III)E.)JI:3 7)#3ZIIAIEJ »I)L)III)/LI} 30!I+ff10»29 4-334-349 be 9 FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 16 EDUCATION MS Civil Engineering 2008,University of Florida BS Civil Engineering 2006,University of Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer, Florida No.73518,2011 Professional Engineer, Georgia No.045374, 2019 Professional Engineer, Texas No.136811,2020 GUS LLANOS,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER Mr.Llanos,with 16 years of experience as a Structural Engineer,has held management positions and specialized in final design and plans production for FDOT bridge projects.His expertise encompasses various bridge designs,including short span flat slab bridges,AASHTO girder and Florida-I beam bridges,post-tensioned structures,and continuous steel plate girder bridges.Additionally,he has significant experience in the design of retaining walls and miscellaneous support structures. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE TERMINAL ISLAND SEAWALL DESIGN I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I The project consists of providing approximately 1,300 linear feet of new seawall at Terminal Island.The project was completed in two phases.Phase l included the preliminary plans for pricing.Phase 2 consisted of the preparation of permit plans and final design.The approximately 50-ft of retained wall height required a king pile system with an anchored dead man system.Layout of the anchors and dead man required significant coordination with the building designer to provide envelopes or areas for the future building foundations to be constructed.Interaction of the future building foundations also required coordination to ensure the wall anchorage and the building foundations did not negatively impact one another. FLEET MANAGEMENT SEAWALL ASSESSMENT G REPAIR I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PROJECT MANAGER 6 ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I The Fleet Management Facility is located on Terminal Island.The rear of the building is adjacent to Government Cut and has an existing steel sheet pile seawall of approximately 200'.The existing seawall was designed with tie backs that extended into the existing building.The existing concrete walkway between the building and seawall had significant settlement and had a segment that collapsed.BCC Engineering was requested to assess the existing conditions and upon our assessment from land and water,it was determined that the soil beneath the walkway had completely washed away.The existing steel sheet pile had completely weathered away along the waterline for the entire length of the seawall which allowed for washout of the soil.Damage to the existing building wall was also encountered.Based on our field assessment and report,it was recommended a new seawall be immediately constructed.BCC provided structural design,construction administration, and CEI services for a new king pile seawall.The seawall was installed immediately in front of the exist seawall and had a maximum pile depth of 63'.The seawall was constructed with additional, sacrificial steel thickness,and additional coatings for increased service life CITY-WIDE BRIDGE REHABILITATION 6 SEAWALL HAZARD MITIGATION I CITY OF SARASOTA I SARASOTA,FL I PROJECT MANAGER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I The City required the ability to engage structural engineering services on an as-needed basis throughout the life of the contract.Services could range from general consultation,lo specific assignments required lo support projects such as safety projects and Complete Streets,to services such as scoping,cost estimates,updating load ratings,and general support of the City's Planning Department.As a result,this TWO involved establishing a contract to enable the City lo engage structural engineering and inspection services on an as-needed basis.This TWO was used for the following: Partial Seawall Replacement -Prepare the design and plans for the partial replacement of an existing seawall located immediately west of Bridge No.175550. MIAMI BEACH € sos ±III.IEE3I0 $3J)I0%8 HJ)$:J)ILL8 III)LJ'JIU 3ELI3 JO!III0»2944-234-3)D) be engno mg Bird Key Seawalls -Several existing seawalls on Bird Key Island were noted to have depressions in the fill and slope pavement behind the walls.Topside as well as underwater inspections were performed.BCC has been tasked with preparing a remediation plan to address the seawall deficiencies. Ringling Park Seawall -Areas behind the existing seawall were noted to have depressions in the fill behind the wall.Topside as well as underwater inspections have been performed.BCC has been tasked with preparing a remediation plan to address the seawall deficiencies. 656 S Owl Drive Post-Design Services Seawall Replacement --This assignment provided post-design services for the seawall replacement at Bridge No. 175550.BCC provided support services through the procurement of the contract. HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE SEAWALLS DESIGN-BUILD I FOOT DISTRICT 7 I TAMP 6 ST.PETERSBURG,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I This high-profile design-build project includes the design and construction of the replacement for the existing NB1-275 (SR 93)Howard Frankland Bridge over Old Tampa Bay and removal of the existing Northbound 1960's existing bridge.The project undertakes major additions and changes to the existing roadway by adding express lanes,improving roadways,enhancing safety, adding capacity,mobility,and accommodating future light rail. The new bridge is over 3 mi.long,located in a highly sensitive environment,subject to vessel collision forces,and has unique soil conditions.The following are some highlights of the new bridge structure: •11,000 LF of seawall comprised of cantilevered and anchored sheet pile,as well as anchored king-pile systems. •Largest bridge in the state of Florida with over 2.6 mi. square feet of bridge deck area •113 spans consisting of 1726 Florida-I beams totaling over 241,000 LF •44 hammerhead piers for the high-level spans,&180 multi-column piers for the low-level spans •3006 -30-inch square prestressed concrete piles with varying lengths of 62 ft to 220 ft. •Designed for vessel collision forces up to 2000 kips MIAMI BEACH GUS LLANOS,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER •Four full span highly aesthetic scenic overlooks to enhance pedestrian experience •Pier mounted overhead sign structures •Includes two single-span shared use path bridges,a 1040 ft long elevated walkway structure,temporary and permanent walls,overhead sign structures,and toll facilities. PALMETTO SECTION 5 DESIGN-BUILD NORTHLINE CANAL RELOCATION I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Th is $559 million-dollar DB project,know n as Palmetto Section 5, consisted of the reconstruction of one of the busiest interchanges in Florida.W ith over 500,000 vehicles tra versing the fa cility on a daily basis,it took skilled coordination and oversight to build this four-level system -to-system interchange consisting of 47 bridges,including four segmental direct ional flyover ramps. Th is project w as the last and lar gest sect ion of the Palmetto Expressw ay Im pro vem ent Progra m (Entire progra m w as 12 Sections).Th e prim ary objective of the project w as to increase capacity along the Palm etto Expressw ay (SR 826}and the Dolphin Expressw ay (SR 836}w hile enhancing existing ram p connections and creating connect ions that did not exist before. •BCC w as the Engineer of Record responsible for developing the structura l design fo r the project,w hich included 47 new bridge structures as w ell as an extensive am ount of permanent and tem pora ry w alls,and overhead sign structures.Structura l im provements included: •2,500 LF of new bulkhead w all including both ca ntilevered and anchored sheet pile w alls fo r the re alignm ent of the N orthline Canal.Anchoring system w as made up of a concrete deadman slab tied w ith steel ro ds •M SE Walls up to 40 feet in height,and temporar y w alls •4 Segm ental Flyover Bridges,4 Steel Plate G irder Bridges &39 Florida-I Beam Bridges •O ver 40 overhead sign struct ures •BCC w as the Lead Designer fo r this pro ject,and provided design services for Structures,Highw ay, Signing &Pavem ent M ar kings,ITS,Lighting,Dra inage,& Enviro nmental Permitting «noon I.IEE3III)S:JIVE;7J;2III1S MI)1III)I1JI3 30±1n!no4 39 24-29 4-3)) bc FIRM BC C Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 15 EDUCATION M S in Civil Engineering, 2009 University of Florida BS in Civil Engineering, 2007,University of Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Engineer, Florida N o.75451,2013 CORY SALZANO,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER M r.Salzano specializes in structural engineering with a focus on FD O T bridge projects and buildings.Project structure types include mast arms,strain poles,sign structures,retaining walls, mechanica lly stabilized ear th (M SE)walls,and bridges;America n Association of State Highway and Transportation O fficials (AASHTO)beam,Florida-I Beam (FIB),bridge widenings;as well as bridge substructure types to include driven pile,drilled shaft,and spread footing foundations.He has also performed structura l analysis,inspections,and studies involving hurrica ne-induced effects on building envelope and structura l core components.M r.Salzano's vertical structure experience extends to forensics analysis and serving as Team Leader for a pilot Coastal Monitoring Program that quantified the resultant load effects of Florida windstorm forces.M r.Salzano is proficient in various structural design and analysis computer applica tions such as MathCAD,RCPier,CO N SPAN LA,and SAP 2000.His experience encompasses the spectrum of engineering support services to include construction supervision for a range of structures brings a unique blend of technica l expertise and pra ctical know how to the project team. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SEAWALL MASTER PLAN [RESILIENCY STUOYJ I CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING SERVICES I BROWARD COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Structura l Engineering Services for City of Fort Lauderdale-ow ned structures,including design,assessments,inspections,and co ordination for var ious projects.The contra ct covers all types of city-owned structures,from infrastructure to waler/ w astew ater facilities,with services such as structural inspection,condition assessment,and design of new structures or rehabilitation of existing ones using conventional and advanced materials.BCC Engineering was selected as a lar ge firm for task orders with estimated co sts up to $200,000 for design or $2,000,000 for construction.Th e contract focuses on innovative and sustainable designs, considering the City's vulnera bility to climate change and sea level rise.It is initially a two-year contra ct w ith the option to renew for two successive one-year increments. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE PROJECT ND.P 12212 SEAWALL MASTER PLAN I CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE I FORT LAUDERDALE,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Th e City owns approximately 4.3 miles of seawall structures and 2.0 miles of natura l banks .Th is task work order required the assessment of the comprehensive needs of these structures and banks,and development of a Seawall Master Plan.The Plan consisted of individual assessment reports for each component,as well as a report summarizing the findings and reco mmendations to included feasible solutions,impacts,and cost estimates.Seawall assessments included inspection of existing structures (above and below water),and reco mmendations for the seaw all infrastructure in need of rehabilitation or replacement The Plan also addressed potential structura l modifica tions and bank needs to address the challenges associated with Sea Level Rise (SLR).BCC completed the assignment on an aggressive four-month schedule in order to have the report finalized so pro jects co uld be budgeted for the Fisca l Year. SR A 1A BRIDGE NO.860011 OVER HILLSBORO INLET I FOOT DISTRICT 4 I BROWARD COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Th is District 4 project involves extensive upgra des to the bascule bridge carrying SR Al A over Hillsboro Inlet,along with several roadway-related safety and operational improvements.The bridge is a cr ucial link betw een the City of Lighthouse Point,the City of Pompano Beach,and the open ocean,heavily used by pedestrians and bicyclists.The pro ject considers the enviro nmentally sensitive M IAM I BEACH ro«a ±I0IEE:IIIJ3III5 ISIIIII3MIU LJII 1IE3 J !A+ff04 ±024-234-3/9 ar ea (O utstanding Florida Waters),includes ar chitectura l enhancem ents,and carefully manages lighting to pro tect sea turtle nesting.It also addresses unique challenges like m aintaining traffic flow ,construct ing an elevated view ing platfo rm ,and ensuring structura l integrity w hile accommodating fishing activities.Services include outreach and co mmunity engagement to clar ify engineering aspects and improve loca l emergency access. SR 826 [PALMETTO EXPRESSWAY)FROM I-75 TO NORTH OF CANAL C-8 I FOOT DISTRICT 61 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ac REVIEWER I Th is project aim s to alleviate congestion on the SR 826 corridor by enhancing capacity and system connectivity,impro ving safety,and providing additional travel options over a 2-mile stretch from 1-75 to north of the Canal C-8 bridge.It includes adding Express Lanes,auxiliar y lanes,reco nstructing the mainline,and enhancing existing interchanges.Challenges include ra ising the mainline by over 8 feet to acco mmodate tw o vehicular underpasses required by the Tow n of M iami Lakes,necessitating car eful M aintenance of Tra ffic and Phased Construct ion plans.Th e project involves fifteen bridge structures, including w idenings of at-grade canal crossings,new long- span curved braided ramps,mainline bridge replacements, and new bridges to connect the City of M iami Lakes.BC C is responsible for severa l structures,including a new steel plate girder bridge,a bridge replacem ent over NW 154th Street, a retro fit of a bridge over N W 13 8th Street,and the design of numero us mast ar m and overhead sign structures. DISTRICT WIDE STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 11 LEE,CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,AND MANATEE COUNTIES, FL I PROJECT ENGINEER I Project Engineer for this contract w hich involved 536 m iscellaneous Ta sk W ork O rder assignments including plans review s,Resurfa cing,Restoration,and Rehabilitation (3 R)evaluations,miscellaneous structure design, and structura l design support of District staff.Assignments also include maintenance of tra ffic (M O T),public involvement (m eetings,outreach),signing,pavement mar kings,phased construct ion,and Technica l Special Provisions.Post design services included review of shop draw ings,RFl's,material certifica tion,and address of unfo reseen conditions during construct ion. DISTRICT-WIDE STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 1 I LEE,CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,AND MANATEE COUNTIES, FL I PROJECT ENGINEER I M iscellaneous Ta sk W ork O rder assignments include plans review s,resurfacing,restoration,and rehabilitation (3R)evaluations,miscellaneous structure design, MIAMIBEACH CORY SALZANO,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER and structural design support of district staff.Assignments also include maintenance of traffic,public involvement (meetings, outreach),signing,pavement markings,phased construction, and technical special provisions.Post design services include review of shop dra w ings,RFl's,material certification,and addressing unfo reseen co nditions during co nstruction. CONTINUING SERVICES DESIGN CONSULTANT CONTRACT I FOOT DISTRICTlILEE,CHARLOTTE.OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA.AND MANATEE COUNTIES.FL I STRUCTURE SUPPORT TEAM LEAD I Th is is a 5-year,$5M Ta sk W ork O rder (TW O )-driven contract with a limit of $500k per TW O .BCC serves as an extension of District Four's staff to deliver a wide ra nge of assignments on any schedule.Th is Continuing Services Contract includes multiple,concurrent TW Os,focusing on the production of a complete set of contract documents,conceptual plans,or component plans for minor pro jects,such as 3R,PO P,Ride-O nly,safety,signal/ lighting upgrades/retrofits,Complete Streets,mobility,railroad dynamic envelope installation,ITS/TSM &O improvement, landsca ping,operational impro vements,and minor bridge rehabilitation projects,or plans review,or RFP /criteria package development.The contract may also be used for in-house staff support services. SR 823 /FLAMINGO ROAD LIGHTING I FOOT DISTRICT 4 I BROWARD,FL I ENGINEER OF RECORD I Th is pro ject is a RRR that includes widening for a right turn lane on Pembroke Road at the southwest co rner of the Pembro ke Road and Flamingo Road Intersection.This w idening causes the requirement of mast ar m relocation. Th e project scope also includes signalization improvements, pedestrian upgrades,and lighting retrofit at each intersection. DISTRICTWIDE STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 41 BROWARD,INDIAN RIVER,MARTIN,PALM BEACH.ST.LUCIE,COUNTIES,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Continuing Services Contract involving var ious miscellaneous Ta sk W ork Order as signments including plans review s,Resurfacing,Restora tion,and Rehabilitation (3R)evaluations,miscellaneous structure design,and structural design support of District staff.Assignments also include maintenance of traffic (M OT),public involvement (meetings, outreach),signing,pavement mar kings,phased co nstruction, and Technica l Special Provisions.Post design services included review of shop dra w ings,RFl's,material certification,and address of unforeseen conditions during co nstruction. «rose6 ±I IIEEEII9 SE.I I3 YI#ZIJI II3 II)LJ)ID LIE3»9!Ir !r»±924-234-3)) be FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 9 EDUCATION M S in Civil Engineering, 2014,University of Florida BS in Civil Engineering, 2013,University of Florida REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer, Florida N o.84339, 2017 RICHARD PICK,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER M r.Pick has 9 year s of experience in Transportation Structure design.His abilities encompass a broad range of skills sets in structural design.His project experience includes structural analysis, bridge load ra tings,and detailing.He is proficient in var ious structural design and analysis computer applica tions such as MathCad,CO N SPAN LA,Atlas,CSI Bridge,and SAP 2000. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE DISTRICT WIDE STRUCTURES REPAIR/REHABILITATION PLANS PREPARATION I FOOT OISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE AND MONROE COUNTIES,FL I PROJECT ENGINEER AND ENGINEER-OF-RECORD I Continuing Services Contract involving 6 miscellaneous Ta sk W ork O rder (TW O )assignments to date including inspections and evaluations, scoping reports,bridge repairs (bridge deck cra cking,spoil repairs,slope stabilization...),structural steel painting,cathodic protection systems,safety and geometry improvements,bridge approach improvements,w ingw all repairs and reconstruction,and scour countermeasures.Projects also included maintenance of traffic,public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing,pavement markings,phased construction,and Technical Special Pro visions.Post design services included review of shop drawings, Requests for Information (RFI's),material certification,and on-call support to the co ntractor during construction. SR 5/0VERSEAS HWY 0VER LIGNUM VITAE CHANNEL REPAIR/REHABILITATION BRIDGE ND.900096 I FOOT OISTRICT 6 I MONROE COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER OF RECORD I Project involved repairs to a 902-foot long AASHTO girder bridge supporting the Overseas Highw ay in the Florida Keys.The project also included installation of cathodic pro tection (galvanic cell drilled shaft jackets),and rehabilitation of the bridge such as spoil repairs,epoxy cra ck injection,and methacrylate bridge deck sealer.Additional considerations included the environmentally sensitive area (Florida Keys M arine Sanctuary).Mr.Fora nd managed all aspect s required to restore the ca pacity of the structure an deliver a successful project.The importance of this structure cannot be overstated.O verseas Highway is a unique lifeline to the Florida Keys,and pro vides the only means of access fo r goods,services,and tourism critica l to the local economy. Uninterrupted traffic (vehicular ,pedestrian,and bicyclist)flow and structura l redundancy were critical aspects of the pro ject,particularly considering the bridge's unprotected exposure to storm events, surges,w ave forces,and scour.Th e bridge also supported the 30-inch water main servicing the Keys.N on-redundant bent columns required special phasing of the column/drilled shaft repairs to ensure that the reduced cro ss section during repairs would support vehicular load without costly and enviro nmentally disruptive tempora ry support measures.Design was completed on schedule and Letting Date met. SR 934/NE 79TH ST OVER INTRACDASTAL CANAL FENDER SYSTEM REPLACEMENT BRIDGE N0S.870085 6 870551 I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER OF RECORD I This project involved replacement of the existing fender system for a 1,025-foot long bascule bridge carrying NE 79th St traffic over the lntracoastal Canal.Key considera tions included phasing the fender system replacement to limit roadway closures, considering fender pile removal/installation for this mid-level bridge required the bascule leaf to be maintained in the open position.Project also involved enviro nmentally sensitive areas and submerged resources (seagra sses).Design was completed on schedule and Letting Date met. M IAM I BEA C H «woos ±IIEE±II8 SE.II3J 7I#JI8I)LIIIJJI1JI; 39 !1 fry 394-234-3)D be SR 886/PORT BOULEVARO 0VER INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY REPAIR/ REHABILITATION BRIDGE NOS.875000 6 875001 I FOOT OISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I ENGINEER OF RECORD I Th e Port Boulevar d Bridge is loca ted betw een the City of M iami and Port of Miami. Th e bridge serves as a vital link betw een Miami and the Port, considering that the M iami Tunnel is the only alternative route. Th is project is multi-faceted and high-profile.Th e 2,521-foot- long bridge supports five traffic lanes,a sidew alk,and critica l utilities.Vertical clear ance at the main channel is 65'-3".Th e 16 spans ar e com prised of precast concrete segments assembled in tw o units.Each bridge utilizes double-box precas t segments. Th e substructure uses tw in fluted hammerhead piers supported founded on a concrete cap and 18"prestressed concrete piles.BC C Engineering investigated the existing bridge condition,existing field conditions,the latest bridge inspection re ports,and as-built plans,and prepared design construction docum ents,plans and technical special provisions for the rehabilitation of the bridge,as w ell as replacement of the east appro ach slab w hich had undergone settlement due to loss of fines creating voids w ithin the bridge appro ach MSE W all mass.Key considera tions included vehicular and pedestrian M O T co nsidering the phased co nstruction required to replace the approach slab and install new expansion finger joints. Design w as com pleted on schedule and Letting Date met. SR 934/NE 79TH ST OVER EAST BISCAYNE BAY BRIDGE NOS.870084 & 870550 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND COST ESTIMATE I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-ADE COUNTY,FLI ENGINEER OF RECORD I Th is project involves tw o tw in bridges,Bridge N os.870084 and 870550, co nnecting N orth Bay Island and Treasure Island in North Bay Village,M iam i-Dade County.Th e 509-foot-long bridges,built in 1971,carry N E 79th Street over East Bisca yne Bay.Bridge N o.870084 handles w estbound traffic,while Bridge No. 870550 handles eastbound traffic.Both bridges are currently Struct ura lly Deficient.During bridge repairs under the Asset M aintenance contract ,significant deficiencies were found in the superstructure underside,including steel stra nds with l 00%section loss extending up to 1 /3 of the span length. SR 826 I PALMETTO EXPRESSWAY)FROM I-75 TO NORTH OF CANAL C-8 I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER BRIDGES 3 AND 8 ]Th is project relieves co ngestion on the SR 826 corridor by increasing capacity and improving system connectivity,enhancing safety by addressing opera tional, structura l,and functional deficiencies,and providing additional tra vel options fo r over 2 miles from 1-75 to north of the Canal C-8 bridge.Im provements co nsist of the addition of Express Lanes,auxiliar y lanes,reconstruction of the mainline,and MIAMI BEACH RICHARD PICK,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER improvements to the existing interchanges.This urban heavily travelled limited-access facility involves many constraints, challenges,and commitments.Notably,the Town of Miami Lakes required the addition of two vehicular underpasses requiring that the mainline be raised by over 8 feet in order to provide the required vertica l clear ances below,requiring enhanced Maintenance of Traffic and Phased Construction considera tions.Th e project involves fifteen bridge structures including widenings of at-grade canal crossings,new long- span curved braided ramps,mainline bridge replacements, and new mainline bridges required to co nnect the City of M iami Lakes.Structures for which BCC is responsible include Bridge No.2-A new ?-span steel plate girder with an integral steel straddle bent;Bridge No.3--Replacement of the existing 2-span bridge carrying SR 826 over NW 154th Street;Bridge No.8-A complicated retrofit involving partial removal of the existing 3-span bridge carrying SR 826 over NW 138th Street; and the design of 18 mast ar m structures and 26 overhead sign structures including DM S panel,span and cantilever. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PROJECTSIMIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER I Continuing Services Contract involving miscellaneous Ta sk Work Order (TW O )assignments including inspections and evaluations, scoping reports,bridge repairs,structural steel painting, ca thodic protection systems,and bridge replacements.Projects also included maintenance of traffic,public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing,pavement markings,phased co nstruction,enviro nmental permitting,Specifications,and Technica l Special Provisions.Post design services included review of shop dra wings,Requests for Information (RFl's), material certification,and on-ca ll support to the contractor during co nstruction. CURTISS PARKWAY OVER MIAMI (SFWMD C-6)CANAL REPAIR/ REHABILITATION AND PAINTING BRIDGE I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURES ENGINEER I Project involved repairs to a 111'long historic 2-span steel thru-truss bridge structure built in 1941.The bridge was constructed as a movable swing span bridge,with the bridge locked down permanently and used as a fixed bridge since 2003.The bridge car ries two lanes of traffic and no sidewalks.Deficiencies included coating system failure,active co rrosion of the structural steel,co ncrete cracks/ delaminations/spalls,and settlement of the west approach slab. wo os ZIIEE:RlIJ 3II3 HJ }J AVIS I»IJ LIIV SUB 1II»9!1Hf»±924-234-3) FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 5 EDUCATION M S in Civil Engineering, 2017,University of South Florida CHUAN CHEN,PE STRUCTURES ENGINEER M r.Chen received his M aster of Technology in Civil Engineering from the University of South Florida, w ith a concentration in Structures.His relevant coursework while at USF included concrete design, pre-stressed co ncrete design,concrete bridge design,steel design and masonry design.He has experience in severa l internships in China.He has 4 years of experience as a structural engineering designer and l year as a structural engineer.In the 5 years,he has par ticipated in final design, pro posal and plans production for FD OT bridge pro jects.His work includes designing Bridges,Walls and M iscellaneous structures and developing design dra wings,and executing quality control for designs and dra w ings including shop dra wing. BS in Civil Engineering, 2014,N ortheast Fo restry TERMINAL ISLAND SEAWALL I KEARNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY I MIAMI-DADE,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I This RELEVANT EXPERIENCE University REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Engineer, Florida N o.93 871. 2022 Engineer Intern, Califo rnia N o.164591, 2018 pro ject consisted of 1300 linear feet of new seawall at Terminal Island.BCC provided the design of the seaw all and plan productions suitable for the building department. F-275 HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE I FOOT DISTRICT 7 I TAMPA,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGNER I The primar y goal of this project is to design and co nstruct the replacement for the existing NB 1-275 (SR 93)H ow ard Frankland Bridge over O ld Ta mpa Bay in Pinellas and Hillsboro ugh Counties and remove the existing Northbound 1960's exiting bridge.The Project undertakes major additions and changes to the existing roadw ay system by adding express lanes,improving existing roadways,enhancing safety,adding capacity and mobility,and accommodating future light rail.The new bridge will be over 15,000 ft long,with 143-ft spans matching the pier locations of the 1990's bridge,enhancing boater safety and aesthetics of the bridge structures.As an added value,our design reconfigures the scenic overlooks making them 4.5 times lar ger than the RFP Concept providing significantly enlarged shaded seating area and refuge fo r maintenance vehicles,as well as an uniform look for all the piers across the bridge,this not only enhances the aesthetics,but also improves the safety of the boaters navigating. D 1 BRIDGE ENGINEERING DESIGN -CONTINUING SERVICES I FOOT DISTRICT 1/WSP I LEE,CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE, SARASOTA,AND MANATEE COUNTIES,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Th is is a general co ntinuing services co ntract for BC C to provide var ious engineering services.This includes designing and preparing co ntract documents such as plans,specifications,and engineering analysis in accordance with FDOT policies. Additionally,BCC w ill review and update the Plan of Action for 93 bridges with scour critical or unknow n foundations. CITY-WIDE BRIDGE REHABILITATION CCNA CONTINUING SERVICES CONTRACT I CITY OF SARASOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I SARASOTA COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Structural Engineering co nsulting engineering services relative to the prepara tion of dra wings,specifications,permits,and other documents needed for the City of Sara sota to rehabilitate and maintain bridges and box culverts city-wide.Bridge projects required structural engineering investigation,design and/or testing resulting in all drawings, specifica tions,permits,and other documents needed for the City to obtain bids for rehabilitation of var ious bridge structures city-w ide.Inspection services included in-depth surveys and inspections to determine the integrity of all bridge structural components including co ndition of steel and masonr y components,support structure integrity,underwater scour review,headwall,seawall and approach slab stability determinations using non-invas ive and non-destructive testing methods as M IAM I BEA C H 0 woos ±IIIEEE,II IE3 3JAL'I.A ILIS IJ LI)IILI3 39!11 131194 2924-234-3)) be engi neering necessar y.Additional struct ura l services involved developing a maintenance plan for each structure being repaired,and Post Design Services such as RFl's,M aterial Submittal Review s, and on-site monitoring during co nstruction.Support services included Utility Coordination,Hazar dous Materials Testing, Environmental Permitting,Coastal Engineering,and Public Involvement.Th e contra ct included specific assignments as well as severa l assignm ents structured on an "as-needed"basis in order to enable the City to engage BCC for services ra nging from general consulting to emergency support requiring immediate response and deployment on site. EMERGENCY INSPECTION AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES I CITY OF SARASOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I SARASOTA COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Th is Ta sk W ork O rder (TW O )established a co ntra ct to enable the City to quickly engage structura l engineering and inspect ion services fo r rapid response in emergencies, such as storm events.Th e co ntra ct budget of $l 00,000 also allow s for engagement of specialty subco nsultants,including inspect ion divers and coastal engineers.The TW O was utilized for Assignm ent 1 during Hurricane N icole in November 2022, w hen the Saprito Pier w as impacted by a recreational vessel. BCC perfo rmed a visual inspection to verify the pier's structura l integrity,pro viding an assessment report w ithin 24 hours and allow ing the pier to remain open CITY OF SARASOTA PURCHASE ORDER NO.PD-22 1711 GENERAL CONSULTING SERVICES I CITY DF SARASOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I SARASOTA COUNTY.FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I The City needed structura l engineering services on an as-needed basis for var ious pro jects, including safety pro jects,Complete Streets initiatives,and genera l support fo r the Planning Depar tment.Th is Ta sk W ork O rder (TW O )established a contra ct to facilitate these services. The TW O w as utilized for several assignments,including prepar ing design and plans for the par tial replacement of a seaw all near Bridge N o.175550,inspecting and preparing remediation plans fo r seaw all deficiencies on Bird Key Island and Ringling Par k. CITY OF SARASOTA GENERAL CONSULTING SERVICES SERENA ST.PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS I CITY OF SARASOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I SARASOTA COUNTY,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I Th is pro ject is fo r the design of a new pedestrian bridge extending from Serena Street right-of-w ay to the shopping plaza west of Beneva Road.Th e bridge needs to cro ss over a County-owned dra inage canal.Sidew alk impro vements necessar y to connect the street to the pedestrian bridge ar e also included.Additional optional services for sidew alk extensions along Serena Street, M IAM I BEA C H CHUAN CHEN,PE STRUCTURES ENG INEER Bailey Road and along the eastern bank of the dra inage ca nal west of the shopping plaza west of Beneva Road will also be considered.Sidewalk work includes tie-in connections at the new pedestrian bridge over County Canal,including all necessar y hardwar e to meet ADA requirements.The sidewalk analysis shall include back-of-sidewalk profiles,and a matrix of impacts with breakdown of cost and supporting documentation. Th e scope of work includes roadway engineering,drainage and permitting,a lighting design analysis report,aerial photography,analysis of the existing hydra ulic models,and other services as specified by the City. STATEWIDE STRUCTURES REVIEW I FOOT CENTRAL OFFICES I STATEWIDE,FL I CATEGORY 2 BRIDGE PLANS AND DESIGN REVIEWER I BCC is providing Category 2 Structures Reviews as assigned by the Structures Design O ffice.BCC is also providing the Independent Depar tment Review (!DR)for the steel box Flyover Ramp on the Dow ntown Interchange Project. CR 664 OVER LITTLE PAYNE CREEK I FOOT DISTRICT 11 HARDEE COUNTY FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I The Little Payne Creek Bridge,a historic off-system bridge near US 17 along CR 664,is structurally deficient and scour critical.This federa lly funded project aims to replace the 1915-built,three-span continuous concrete spandrel ar ch structure to meet current design and safety standar ds.The new bridge will have two ]l-foot travel lanes,5-foot shoulders, and 36-inch single slope traffic railings,matching the existing bridge's profile to avoid Right-of-W ay acquisition.Other work includes pavement preservation,reconstruction of bridge appro aches,and general safety enhancements,with the bridge closure and detour planned for the replacement. DISTRICTWIDE STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 11 LEE,CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,AND MANATEE COUNTIES,FL I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER I 536 Tas k W ork Order assignments to date including plans reviews,Resurfacing,Restoration,and Rehabilitation (3R)evaluations,miscellaneous structure design, and structura l design support of District staff.Assignments also include maintenance of traffic (M OT),public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing,pavement markings,phased construction,and Technica l Special Provisions.Post design services included review of shop drawings,RFl's,material certification,and address of unforeseen co nditions during construction. o »soc ZIIE:±III0J 3JI3 710$II113 II)1III)LIE8 39±1+fr0y 29 2 4 -2 34-3)) be FIRM BC C Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 EOUCATION M S in Civil Engineering, 1998,University of Florida M S in Construction M anagement,1997, Southern Polytechnic University,Korea BS in Civil Engineering, 1994,Keimyung University,Korea SUNGRYONG HAN GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS)SPECIALIST M r.Han is a Senior Planner and Lead Technical professional for Travel Demand Modeling and is responsible for long range tra nsportation planning,subar ea/corridor planning,land use planning, project development and enviro nmental (PD&E}studies,geographic information system (GIS}projects, and tra ffic engineering studies.He has completed work on converting the state's transportation models to Citilabs'Cube Voyager softwar e.In addition to the Cube Voyager software he has experience with var ious other tra ffic engineering and GIS software,including Highway Capacity Softwar e (HCS), Synchro ,VISSIM ,Florido Standar d Urban Tra nsportation Model Structure (FSUTMS},ArcGIS,and Tra nsCAD.His work has gained him credibility and an outstanding relationship with the client RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SEAWALL MASTER PLAN !RESILIENCY STUOYJ I CITY OF FORT LAUOEROALE I FORT LAUOEROALE,FL I 6IS SPECIALIST I Th e City ow ns appro ximately 4.3 miles of seawall structures and 2.0 miles of natural banks.This task w ork order required the as sessment of the comprehensive needs of these structures and banks, and development of a Seaw all Master Plan.The Plan consisted of individual assessment reports for each component,as well as a report summar izing the findings and recommendations to included feasible solutions,impacts,and co st estimates.Seawall assessments included inspection of existing structures (above and below water),and reco mmendations for the seawall infrastructure in need of rehabilitation or replacement.Th e Plan also addressed potential structural modifications and bank needs to address the challenges associated with Sea Level Rise (SLR).BCC co mpleted the assignment on an aggressive four-month schedule in order to have the report finalized so projects could be budgeted for the Fiscal Year . TAMPA BAY REGIONAL TRAVEL SURVEYS I FOOT DISTRICT 7 I TAMPA,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER AND SENIOR PLANNER I Review ed Ta mpa Bay Regional Travel Surveys -Household Travel Survey (TB HTS)data files and external passive O rigin-Destination (O -D)table data files;wrote R script code to develop tour file based on trip file from TB HTS;updated R scripts to generate TB HTS summary results for TB RABM calibration purpose,and co mpar ed them with the current TB RABM summar y results;used ArcG IS to show the difference in extern al trips between passive 0-D data and TB RPM;prepared related presentation files. COLLIER MPO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT AND ACTION PLAN I TINDALE OLIVER 6 ASSOCIATES I COLLIER COUNTY,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER AND SENIOR PLANNER I Th is project aims to provide a thorough system assessment to identify where priority investments should be made.Th e performance report w ill include an analysis of newly implemented CM S/ITS pro jects based on the performance measures identified in the CM P as specifically assigned to each funded project -Responsible for study resear ch,data source comparison,data cleaning and data processing,generating speed map w ith ArcG IS. FOOT DISTRICT 2-GENERAL PLANNING CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 21 DISTRICTWIDE,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER I Th e Department requires the professional services of a Consultant to act as an extension of the Depar tment by providing technica l personnel to perform services to support the Planning Depar tment,w ith systems planning activities.Th e work may involve (but is not limited to):FSUTMS / Cube M odeling Activities,Evaluations fo r and to the SIS,Project Traffic Reports,Planning for ITS Facilities M IAM I BEACH «r oar ±AI8III:EII5 3:3II3 1#3III1$I L'JIU LIE3»9!II!no 2924-234-3)) be 9 SUNGRVON HAN GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS)SPECIALIST and Equipment,Preliminary Safety Analyses,Congestion Management Analysis,Development /Maintenance of the Scenic Highway/Enhancement Programs,Plan Review / Recommendations of Local Government Comprehensive Plans (LGCP)/Development of Regional Impacts (DRI),GIS mapping /Public Involvement activities,as they specifically relate to the above efforts,and other related incidental tasks. The Department will provide a designated FDOT Project Manager for each assignment authorized under this contract; however,the Consultant will minimize the Department's need to apply its own resources to assignments authorized by Task Work Order (TWO)to the Consultant. FLORIDA STATEWIDE MODEL DEVELOPMENT I FOOT CENTRAL OFFICE/ CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS,INC.I TALLAHASSEE,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER AND SENIOR MODELER I Project Manager responsible for developing new Florida statewide model Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ)structure,GIS based highway and multi- modal networks,and socio-economic data.Project tasks also include new application development,report,network calibration and validation. 1-195/SR 112 CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY FROM 12TH AVENUE TO SR 907 /ALTON ROAD I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER AND SENIOR PLANNER I I-195 is a vital limited access facility in Miami-Dade County carrying approximately 130,000 vehicles daily.It provides a direct connection to Miami International Airport (via State Road 112 [SR 112]) from Interstate 95 (1-95)and the densely populated areas of Miami Beach.The corridor provides interchange access to several neighborhoods recently experiencing significant growth including the Design District,Midtown,and Wynwood in the City of Miami.The objective of this Planning Study is, through a process of collaborative stakeholder coordination, identify and develop multi modal improvements within the 1-195 study corridor to address future mobility and safety needs. These needs include;the need for more direct access to the 1-95 express lanes for areas along 1-195 east of 1-95,need for improvements within the 1-195 Midtown Interchange areas (at N Miami Avenue and at Biscayne Boulevard),the need to determine the feasibility of a separated bicycle /pedestrian path along the Julia Tuttle Causeway connecting between the City of Miami and City of Miami Beach and,the need for long term improvements within the SR 112/Alton Road Interchange area in the City of Miami Beach. I-75/SR 826 MANAGED LANES INVESTMENT GRADE TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY I FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE I BROWARD AND MIAMI-DADE MIAMI BEACH COUNTIES,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER AND SENIOR MODELER I Project QA/QC Coordinator responsible for coordinating and overseeing sub-area modeling,investment grade traffic estimation,and toll choice modeling implementation for a 34-mile managed lane section on the 1-75 and SR 826 to the Florida Turnpike,managed lane alternative analysis including analysis and evaluation of Bluetooth Origination-Destination (OD)data and the stated/revealed preference survey during the investment grade study. SR 836/1-395 FROM WEST 0F 1-95 T0 MACARTHUR CAUSEWAY BRIDGE I FOOT DISTRICT 61 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR MODELER I BCC is providing support services on behalf of FDOT for the concept development,procurement,and design phases of this project. BCC prepared the preliminary geometric design for the reconstruction of the entire 1-395 corridor,from the original terminus at the west side of the I-95/Midtown Interchange (I-95/SR 836/1-395)to the original corridor terminus at the West Channel Bridges of US 41/MacArthur Causeway.This project was developed to improve mainline operations along 1-395,reduce congestion on the surface streets below and provide enhanced access to the Performing Arts Center and surrounding areas of downtown Miami.BCC is also reviewing on behalf of the Department the roadway,traffic control,signing and pavement marking,and signalization plan components as submitted by the Designers. SW 87TH AVENUE AND 8TH STREET PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E)STUDY -DISTRICT WIDE PLANNING AND PD6E CONSULTANT SUPPORT CONTRACT I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I TASK MANAGER AND SENIOR PLANNER I Responsible for the development of a sub-area travel demand model and concept traffic to assess the PD&E study area.The assessment focused on the impact of alternatives to provide reliable forecast of future traffic conditions.Project responsibilities included data management,quality control,schedule adherence and project coordination. HOMESTEAD EXTENSION OF FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE IHEFTJ AND NW 25TH STREET CONNECTIONS/NW 25TH STREET VIADUCT EXTENSIONS TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY I FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGER AND SENIOR MODELER I Project Manager responsible for project coordination,data management,travel demand model development and validation,sub-area model development,socio-economic data conversion and updates,land use alternative development and test,alternative analysis for trucks,and revenue and traffic analysis. € «aeons ±IUIIEZRI9 YE3JIE3 #DJ1SJIII3;I)LJJIIV JI1II 30±If!r04 2924-234-34) be FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 8 EDUCATION M S in W ater Resources Engineering,2019, University of Puerto Rico BS in Civil Engineering, 2016,University of Puerto Rico REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Engineering Intern Texas N o.70600,2020 JEAN PIERRE VALLE,El,CFM G EO G RA PHIC IN FO RMATIO N SYSTEM S (G IS )SPECIA LI ST M r.Jean Pierre Valle is a Civil Engineer with a Master's Degree in Environmental and W ater Resources Engineering.As a graduate student,he worked with NO AA at the National Water Center and the Ear th System Resear ch Labora tories.He has three years of experience working with hydro logic and hydra ulic design in his professional career. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE VILLAGE OF PINECREST GEC I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I MIAMI FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Th is is a continuing ar chitectural and engineering services contract with Village of Pinecrest.Several Task Work Orders ar e:Drainage Project Phase I:SW 70th Avenue between SW 128th street to SW 133rd street, 100DN -1W drainage improvements -Phase 2:SW 73rd court between SW 10 4th street to SW 98th street,SW 100th street from SW 73rd court to SW 72 nd Ave and SW 98th street from SW 73rd CT to SW 72 nd Ave and SW 98th street from SW 73RD CT to SW 72 nd Ave,C 100DN-1W Drainage Impro vements Phase 1:SW 71 st Avenue between SW 104th street to SW 101 st street and SW 72 nd avenue betw een SW 104th street and SW 98th street,Vulnerability Assessment and Basin C 1 00A E-2 Dra inage Impro vements. VILLAGE OF PINECREST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT TWO #4 I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I MIAMI,FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Th is is Ta sk W ork Order #4 for Village of Pinecrest.Th is task is a vulnera bility assessment w hich w ill identify ar eas within the Village most susceptible to damage from an increase in sea-level and groundw ater rise. C 100N-1W DRAINAGE DESIGN -PHASE 2 TWO #2 I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I MIAMI.FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Th is is Ta sk W ork O rder #2 for Village of Pinecrest C lO 0DN-1 W drainage improvements -Phase 2: SW 73rd court betw een SW 104th street to SW 98th street,SW 100th street from SW 73 rd court to SW 72 nd Ave and SW 98th street from SW 73rd CT to SW 72 nd Ave and SW 98th street from SW 73RD CT to SW 72 nd Ave. CITY OF SARASOTA:CITY-WIDE BRIDGE REHABILITATION CCNA -INSPECTION OF STRUCTURE 175620 SEAWALL I CITY OF SARASOTA I SARASOTA,FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I The City of Sar asota required the ability to engage structura l engineering services on an as-needed basis throughout the life of the contract. Services could ra nge from general consultation,to specific assignments required to support projects such as safety pro jects and Complete Streets,to services such as sco ping,cost estimates,updating load ratings,and genera l support of the City's Planning Depar tment.As a result,this TW O involved establishing a contract to enable the City to engage structural engineering and inspection services on an as-needed basis.Th is TW O was used for the following:Assignment 1 Par tial Seawall Replacement -Prepar e the design and plans fo r the par tial replacement of an existing seawall located immediately w est of Bridge No.175550,Assignment 2 Bird Key Seawalls -Several existing seawalls on Bird Key Island were noted to have depressions in the fill and slope pavement behind the walls.Topside as w ell as underw ater inspections were performed.BCC has been tasked with preparing a remediation plan to address the seaw all deficiencies and Assignment 3 Ringling Par k Seawall-Areas behind the existing seaw all were noted to have depressions in the fill behind the wall.Topside as well as underw ater inspections have been performed.BCC has been tasked with preparing a remediation plan to address the seaw all deficiencies. M IA M I BEAC H € w«so +EIEE±II9 $J I3 7I#SEAL'III3 MIU LJIID LIE; 30 ±4 11yr)±9 2 4-394-3)) be engineering JEAN PIERRE VALLE,El,CFM GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS)SPECIALIST CITY OF DORAL -VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT I CITY OF DORAL I DORAL, FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I As par t of this Service O rder, BC C Engineering,LLC.(BC C )w ill support the City of Doral (C ity)in com pleting the Vulnerability Assessment [VA),per s. 380.093,ES.,w hich w ill identify ar eas w ithin the City most susceptible to damage from an increase in sea-level and gro undw ater rise.Th is Service O rder w ill be an integra l par t of the Continuing Pro fessional Engineering Services Agreement (RFQ N o.2019-05)betw een the City and BCC. CITY OF LAUDERHILL MISC PROF SERVICES I CITY OF LAUDERHILL I LOCATION I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Th is continuous engineering professional services contract consists of providing technical services,and prepar e studies,conceptual renderings, prelim inar y and final designs,specifica tions and bidding docum ents,opinion of construction cost,assist during the bid process and aw ard of contracts,perform evaluations, inspections,repairs,as w ell as services during construction of any im provement pro ject. CITY OF LAUDERHILL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT I CITY OF LAUDERHILL I LAUDERHILL,FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Th e City of Lauderhil developed a Stormw ater M anagement and Flood Protection M aster Plan (SM FPM P)for evaluating drainage conditions w ithin the City's five (5)primar y drainage basins.Th e City of Lauderhill Vulnera bility Assessment (Project)(VA)will expand the SM FPM P to meet the requirements of s.380.093(3)(c),F.S. Th is includes determining the specific risks posed by flooding due to sea level/groundw ater rise and increased frequency, dura tion,and intensity of rainfall events.As par t of this effort,the VA will identify critical and regionally significa nt infrastructure, ow ned and/or maintained by the City,that is susceptible to flooding. DISTRICT WIDE STRUCTURES DESIGN CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 1 I LEE, CHARLOTTE,OKEECHOBEE,SARASOTA,MANATEE COUNTIES,FL I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Th is contra ct co nsists of 133 miscellaneous Ta sk W ork O rder assignments including plans review s, Resurfa cing,Restoration,and Rehabilitation (3R)evaluations, m iscellaneous structure design,and structura l design suppor t of District staff Assignments also include maintenance of traffic (M O T),public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing, pavement mar kings,phased construction,and Technica l Special Pro visions.Post design services included review of shop dra w ings,RFl's,material certifica tion,and address of unforeseen co nditions during co nstruction. M IAM I BEACH LBJ EAST 1-635 EXPANSION I TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I DALLAS COUNTY,TX I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I This project consisted of a reconstruction and improvement of 11.2 mile section of 1635 in Dallas County.Developed hydrologic analysis using HEC-HM S and performed hydra ulic calculations using HY-8.Assisted in the prepar ation of the final report and created maps and exhibits. WATER CONTROL MANUAL I UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS I FORT WORTH DISTRICT,TX I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Project consisted of the update of the W ater Control Manuals for multiple Dams in the Texas and Arkansas region.The goal of the Water Control Manuals is to provide a guideline that specifies how a reservoir is operated.W orked on the update of the W ater Control Manual for the Felsenthal Lock and Dam located in Arkansas.Responsibilities included research of data such as topography,geology and soils,sediments,climate, historic storms and floods in the area,and water quality.A new manual and exhibits were created to reflect current conditions of the Dam.O ther W ater Control Manuals were also updated, but the tasks were limited to specific changes in the exhibits or tables. PROJECT CONNECT -ORANGE LINE I TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I CITY OF AUSTIN,TX I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I Pro ject co nsisted in the design of the new north to south light roil line that will serve the central spine of Austin from North Lamar to Stassney Lane.Performed hydro logic analysis to determine peak flows for the crossings along the 20 miles of the proposed light ra il alignment.Assisted in the hydra ulic modeling (HEC- RAS),the design sheets,and the writing of the final report. LOOP 1604 EXPANSION I TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I BEXAR COUNTY,TX I WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER I The project consisted of the improvement of a 17.5 mile section of Loop 1604 from 0.38 miles north of FM 1303 to FM 1346 in Bexar County,Texas. Performed hydrologic (HEC-HM S)and hydraulic modeling (HEC-RAS).Par ticipated in the collection and preprocessing of the GIS datasets.Assisted in the writing of the report and created exhibits. oosoor ±IIEE3III0 $JI3 #1JAL13 AI)III)LIE3 39±tr3no4 2024-234-3) RICARDO "RICK"DURAN,CC UTILITY CO O RDIN ATO R FIRM BC C Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 22 EDUCATION M r.Dura n is a Certified Genera l Contractor with over 2l year s of experience providing utility coordination for var ious agencies including the Florida Department of Transportation (FD OT)and Turn pike,M iami-Dade County,Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (M DX),City of Miami Beach, City of Fort Lauderdale,Bro war d County and Ora nge County.M r.Dura n has been part of FDOT's District 6 M aintenance O ffice as a Permit Specialist.His expertise includes the review of permits, project coordination and scheduling.M r.Duran is very familiar with the State's utility design and BA in English Literature,,.,:d a..·d eli.M D :.3BCC H +h D,:..··M r ••construction criteria an permitting guilelines.r.uranis partot s Iglw ay 'vision in 1am . 2001,Florida International RELEVANT EXPERIENCEUniversity REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS FL Certified G eneral Contra ctor,CG C N o. 1522689,2014 DISTRICT WIDE UTILITY COOROINATION SERVICES I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Provided Utility Coordination Services as Senior Utility Coordinator for this project and completed numero us major roadw ay pro jects under the contract while in accordance with FDOT's standards,policies and procedures.M r.Dura n was also familiar with FDOT's utility agreements.Tasks have included all phases of utility negotiations and relocation (electric,teleco mmunica tions/cable, w ater/sew er,gas/fuel). DISTRICT WIDE UTILITY COOROINATION PRODUCTION SUPPORT I FOOT DISTRICT 4 I DISTRICT WIDE,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Provided Utility Coordination Services as Senior Utility Coordinator for this project on a task w ork order basis in accordance with FD O T's standar ds,policies,and procedures.Assisted with prepar ation and presentation of the District Utility Coordination Process W orkshop in conjunction with the District Utilities O ffice. CITY OF MIAMI -DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE FOR REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION OF CITYWIDE ROADS I CITY OF MIAMI I MIAMI,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Th is City of M iami project may include,but is not limited to, developing a Design Criteria Package that addresses drainage improvements,stormwater modeling, reconstruction,milling and resurfacing,sidewalks,Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)compliant ramps,curbs and/or gutters,pavement mar kings and striping,roadway signage,utility coordination, and limited landsca ping services.Th e Scope of Services also include surveying,geotechnical investigations and testing,and related services necessar y for the preparation of the Design Criteria Package for a var iety of different streets and intersections located throughout the City of Miami that ar e currently in very poor conditions and require reco nstruction and/or repairs. PD&E I-195/SR 112 FROM NW 12 AVE T0 SR-9 I METRIC ENGINEERING I MIAMI,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Th is project proposes traffic opera tional,capacity and multimodal improvements along interstate 195 (I-195)/SR 112/Julia Tuttle Causeway co rridor from NW 12th Avenue to SR 907 /Alton Road and w ithin the surrounding ra mp terminal areas.Another project objective is to improve bicycle and pedestrian co nnectivity through the implementation of a protected and separ ated shar ed use path along the Julia Tuttle Causeway between the City of Miami and the City of Miami Beach.Located w ithin the cities of Miami and M iami Beach in Miami-Dade County,the co rridor provides interchange access to several neighborhoods recently experiencing significa nt gro wth including the Design District ,M idtow n,and W ynwood in the City of M iami.Additionally,the corridor is vital in providing a direct connection betw een Miami International Airport (M IA)via SR 112,1-95,and the densely populated ar eas of Miami Beach.Travel demand in this corridor is expected to increase over the next M IAM I BEACH as»+±IOI,I EE»I5 SE3II3 YU#;JA ILS III)LJJIV )LB3 39!I f»n+04 2924-234-3JD) be ngreemng 30 year s due to co ntinued grow th that is being planned within the tw o cities and greater M iami-Dade County."BCC led the successful co mpletion of the 1-195 Corridor Planning Study w hich established initial purpose &need,project feasibility and potential solutions.BC C is a major partner on the PD&E team focused on refining the project's purpose and need,further developing multi modal solutions to address mobility and safety issues,and fa cilitating extensive stakeholder coordination to ensure equitable par ticipation in the development of those solutions to obtain pro ject loca tion and design co ncept acceptance.BCC is pro viding the pro ject team with diverse support including concept development support (roadw ay and structures),tra ffic and safety analysis support and stakeholder coordination as w ell as serving as technical project advisor. DESIGN BUILD OPERATION 6 MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR AN ITS 6 SMART PARKING SYSTEMS I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I BCC is the pro ject prim e ITS designer and Design Project Manager.Th e project consisted of the Installation of Closed-Circuit Television Cam eras (C CT V),M icrow ave Vehicle Detectors (M VDS), Dynam ic M essage Signs (D M S),Travel Time Bluetooth sensors, a M icrow ave w ireless communications netw ork,Par king Counters w ith loca l availability parking count LED info rmation sign on all main ro ads and public parking gar ages within the City of M iami Beach.Th e scope also included the design for a Regional Central Contro l Center and Custom ITS/ATM S control Softw ar e.BC C's responsibilities included Design Project M anagement,ITS Design,M iscellaneous Structura l Design, Utility Coordination,Electrica l Calculations,Tra ffic Contro l, and plans production. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH DESIGN/BUILD/OPERATION G MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR AN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ANO SMART PARKING SYSTEM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Th is design-build/operation & maintenance project requires city-w ide impro vements for a new intelligent tra nsportation system (ITS),including CCTV cameras, Advanced Dynam ic M essage Signs (ADM S)and associated infrastruct ure im pro vements.M r.Duran is responsible for providing outreach to existing utility agencies within the pro ject lim its and ensuring co nflicts w ill not ar ise with the pro posed im provem ents.In addition,service points fo r the ADM S devices w ere co ordinated w ith Florida Pow er &Light to ensure load dem ands can be met. MIAMI BEACH RICARDO "RICK"DURAN,CGC UTILITY COORDINATOR ITV OF MIAMI -DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE FOR REPAIR ANO RECONSTRUCTION OF CITYWIDE ROADS I CITY OF MIAMI I MIAMI,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Th is City of Miami project may include,but is not limited to,developing a Design Criteria Package that addresses dra inage improvements,stormwater modeling,reconstruction, milling and resurfacing,sidewalks,America ns with Disabilities Act (ADA)co mpliant ramps,curbs and/or gutters,pavement mar kings and striping,roadway signage,utility coordination, and limited landscaping services.The Sco pe of Services also include surveying,geotechnical investigations and testing,and related services necessar y for the prepar ation of the Design Criteria Package for a variety of different streets and intersections loca ted throughout the City of Miami that are currently in very poor conditions and require reconstruction and/or repairs. BCC Engineering is providing utility co ordination services for development of the City's design criteria package.Main Project Responsibilities:M r.Duran is responsible for obtaining preliminary utility information for implementation onto co ncept plans,co ordinate initial co ntact transmittal to Utility Companies and meet production schedules,assist EOR in identifying all existing utilities and coordinate any new installations,assisting EO R with identifying utility conflicts. 04 CONTINUING SERVICES DESIGN CONSULTANT CONTRACT I FOOT DISTRICT 4 I BROWARD,FL I SENIOR UTILITIES COORDINATOR I Th is is a 5-year, $5M Ta sk W ork Order (TW O )-driven co ntract with a limit of $500k per TW O .BCC serves as an extension of District Four's staff to deliver a wide range of assignments on any schedule.This Continuing Services Contract includes multiple, concurrent TW O s,focusing on the production of a complete set of contract documents,conceptual plans,or component plans for minor pro jects,such as 3 R,PO P,Ride-Only,safety,signal/ lighting upgrades/retrofits,Complete Streets,mobility,railroad dynamic envelope installation,ITS/TSM &O improvement, landscaping,operational improvements,and minor bridge rehabilitation projects,or plans review,or RFP /criteria package development. «no«a+±I)INIEEIII0 $E3JI:BJ YUE;EZJIAII;IJ LI)I)L IE 19±4Irr»2v24-234-/) be FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 25 EDUCATION BS in Architectural Engineering,2015, University of Miami REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE),Vice President of University of Miami Student Chapter 1998-1999 National Society of Architectural Engineers, Treasurer of University of Miami Student Chapter, 1997-1998 CARLOS MORALES RESILIENCY SPECIALIST Mr.Morales is BCC's Civil Division Manager.He is a seasoned professional with 25 years of experience,known for his proactive approach and creative problem-solving skills.He excels in dynamic environments,and making confident decisions under pressure.A collaborative leader,he fosters team growth while efficiently managing multiple projects and building lasting client relationships. His passion for creative problem-solving is matched by his ability to make confident decisions even in high-pressure situations,allowing him to excel in dynamic environments.Mr.Morales takes great pride in his role as a collaborative team leader who not only provides guidance but also fosters the professional and personal growth of team members.His proficiency in efficiently managing multiple projects and teams is complemented by his skills in nurturing enduring relationships with clients and consultants.Together,these qualities form a solid foundation for consistently delivering outstanding results and contributing to the success of every endeavor he is involved in. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 72NO &PARK I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER I The project consisted of the development of a 32-story mixed-use high-rise located in the City of Miami Beach.Stormwater management was successfully implemented through two drainage wells and a specialized exfiltration trench with a sand filter,specifically designed for the garage area drain.The determination of the finished floor elevation (FFE)was coordinated with the City of Miami Beach,which planned to raise the roads in the future as part of the North Beach Project.Consequently,the FFE was established two feet higher than the existing road level,and to achieve a seamless transition,the harmonization of the right-of-way (ROW)involved the implementation of a series of steps and ramps.In addition to the stormwater management components,the project encompassed the installation of two sanitary sewer manholes and approximately 500 linear feet of 12-inch DIP watermain.This comprehensive approach ensured compliance with city standards and regulations,addressing various infrastructure aspects to support the successful development of the high-rise. TOWN CENTER GATEWAY I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER I The project involved the development of a 28-story mixed-use high-rise located in the City of Miami Beach. Stormwater management was successfully implemented through two drainage wells and a specialized exfiltration trench with a sand filter,specifically designed for the garage area drain.The determination of the finished floor elevation (FFE)was coordinated with the City of Miami Beach,which planned to raise the roads in the future as part of the North Beach Project.Consequently,the FFE was established two feet higher than the existing road level,and to achieve a seamless transition,the harmonization of the right-of-way (ROW)involved the implementation of a series of steps and ramps.In addition to the stormwater management components,the project encompassed the installation of two sanitary sewer manholes and approximately 500 linear feet of 12-inch DIP watermain.This comprehensive approach ensured compliance with city standards and regulations,addressing various infrastructure aspects to support the successful development of the high-rise. JEFFERSON PLAZA I PRIVATE I NORTH MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER I Developed for a private client,the project entailed the development of an 18-acre site for multiple big-box retail stores along with several outparcels.The design encompassed various components,including surface parking lot MIAMI BEACH 0 «woo.as IE±II9 SE)IEE3 I#}JINESIJ LIIV SIB1IE3 30±1I1Mr1y 2924-234-19 design,stormwater mitigation,a watermain extension,and a wastewater pump station specifically developed for the City of North Miami Beach.Stormwater management was addressed through a network of exfiltration trenches designed to handle the 5-year-l-day storm event.To comply with Miami-Dade County Fire Department regulations,a 12-inch watermain extension was incorporated into the design Additionally,the wastewater system design adhered to North Miami Beach Standards and required the installation of a wastewater pump station.This comprehensive approach to the project ensured not only compliance with regulatory standards but also effective infrastructure design to support the development of big-box retail and outparcels on the 18-acre site. ABBOTT AVENUE STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS I TOWN OF SURFSIDE I SURFSIDE,FL I SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER I The project was divided into two phases.Phase I consisted of providing comprehensive civil engineering services of the existing stormwater drainage condition of Abbott Avenue,spanning from 90th Street to 96th Street.The scope of services encompasses the evaluation and assessment of the current stormwater drainage conditions,as well as the preparation of a detailed report offering viable options to mitigate issues associated with ponding and standing water.The report included a review and evaluation of all existing pertinent information and materials,including plans, narratives,calculations,and the ICPR model.Furthermore, the design furnished a findings and conclusion report, appraising the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of previously proposed solutions.Phase II co nsisted of a series of drainage improvements,which included the design of two underground stormwater pump stations located at the intersections of Abbott Avenue with 9lst Street and 92nd Street.Each pump station was designed to discharge into three stormwater injection wells,with an additional overflow connection leading to the intercoastal waterway.To regulate the flow,a control structure with a flap gate was incorporated to ensure that the stormwater would not reach the intercoastal until the desired design pressures were achieved. GROVE ISLES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS I GROVE ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION I MIAMI,FL I SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER I The scope of work generally consisted of preparation of a detailed existing stormwater system evaluation,preparation of improvement options (with construction costs and schedules),public MIAMI BEACH CARLOS MORALES RESILIENCY SPECIALIST workshops and presentations to the community,once an option was selected construction documents and permitting for the stormwater system rehabilitation was underway,bid procurement assistance (including preparing bid documents, bid itemization schedule,bid advertisements and invitations, pre-bid meeting,pre-qualifying contractors,bid tabulation and review for selection)and construction management.Grove Isle was built in the early 1970s and encompasses most of the 20- acre man made in-fill island dredged out of Biscayne Bay in the 1920's.A multiple basin analysis and testing of the pre- existing drainage wells was performed.Based on a detailed evaluation and the poor condition of the pre-existing drainage wells it was determined that they would need to be abandoned and replaced with new wells. EAGLE BANK I PRIVATE I BAY HARBOR ISLAND,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I The project,commissioned by a private client,involved the construction of a bank located in Harbor Island The civil design was comprehensive,covering the stormwater system, paving and grading,as well as water,fire,and sewer services. The stormwater system incorporated a control structure and drainage well for effective water management.The design of water,fire,and sewer services adhered to the MD WASD Standards,ensuring compliance with regulatory and safety requirements.This approach aimed to create a well-integrated and compliant infrastructure for the bank construction. MIAMI DADE COUNTY EDP -MULTIPLE STORMWATER PUMP STATIONS I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DTPW I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER I Developed for Miami-Dade County DTPW,the project focused on the improvement designs for six stormwater pump stations across the County.This initiative involved upgrading the pump stations by replacing telemetry sensors, implementing a SCADA system,adjusting pump run times,and constructing additional louvers,trash racks,sluice gates,and gate actuators.Throughout the project,extensive coordination efforts were undertaken with both the equipment manufacturer and the county.This collaborative approach ensured seamless integration of the upgraded components,enhancing the overall efficiency and performance of the stormwater pump stations. The improvements aimed at modernizing and optimizing the infrastructure,aligning with Miami-Dade County's commitment to effective stormwater management. 0 sass ±IIIEIEI0 )I3 HI3I.III8 III LJJIU 3LIE; 39±1Ifft»3934-234-3/9 FIRM BCC Engineering,LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 11 EDUCATION PhD in Water Resources Engineering,2021, University of Central Florida MS in Geology- Hydrogeology 2017, West Virginia University MS in Geology- Hydrology,2012, Shahrood University of Technology BS in Geology,2009, University of Tehran MOHAMMAD SHOKRI,PHO RESILIENCY SPECIALIST Mr.Shokri has received his PhD in Civil-Water Resources Engineering from the University of Central Florida.He has several years of experience combined while acquiring his PhD program,Masters degrees (Geology-Hydrology),and Bachelor degree (Geology).Dr.Shokri's experience includes stormwater hydrology,management,and treatment;karst hydrology;and hydrogeology in diverse geographical areas (Florida,West Virginia,and Iran). RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CITY OF D0ORAL -VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT I CITY OF DORAL I DORAL,FL I LEAD RESEARCH/PROJECT ENGINEER I As part of this Service Order,BCC Engineering,LLC.(BCC)will support the City of Doral (City)in completing the Vulnerability Assessment (VA),per s.380.093,F.S.,which will identify areas within the City most susceptible to damage from an increase in sea-level and groundwater rise.This Service Order will be an integral part of the Continuing Professional Engineering Services Agreement (RFQ No.2019-05)between the City and BCC. VILLAGE OF PINECREST GEC I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I MIAMI,Fl I LEAD RESEARCHER/PROJECT ENGINEER I This is a continuing architectural and engineering services contract with Village of Pinecrest.Several Task Work Orders are:Drainage Project Phase I:SW 70th Avenue between SW 128th street to SW 133rd street,lO0DN-l W drainage improvements -Phase 2:SW73rd court between SW 104th street to SW 98th street,SW 100th street from SW73rd court to SW 72nd Ave and SW 98th street from SW 73rd CT to SW72d Ave and SW 98th street from SW 73RD CT to SW 72nd Ave,ClO0DN-1 W Drainage Improvements Phase 1:SW71st Avenue between SW 104th street to SW 101 st street and SW 72nd avenue between SW 104th street and SW 98th street,Vulnerability Assessment and Basin C lO0A E-2 Drainage Improvements. C 1000N-1W DRAINAGE DESIGN -PHASE 1 TWO #3 I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I MIAMI,Fl I LEAD H&H MODELER/PROJECT ENGINEER I This is Task Work Order #3 for Village of Pinecrest C 1 00DN-l W Drainage Improvements Phase 1 :SW 71 st Avenue between SW 104th street to SW 101st street and SW 72 nd avenue between SW l 04th street and SW 98th street.This project includes the design,permitting,and post- design services for the required roadway and drainage improvements.Phase l of this project includes a total of 3,890 linear feet of roadway and drainage improvements. VILLAGE OF PINECREST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT I VILLAGE OF PINECREST I MIAMI,FL I LEAD RESEARCHER/ PROJECT ENGINEER I In response to Florida's vulnerability to flooding and climate-related challenges,the Florida Legislature initiated the Resilient Florida (RF)Grant Program during the 2021 regular session. This program,managed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP),aims to assist local governments in conducting Vulnerability Assessments (VAs)addressing risks related to flooding, sea-level rise,and climate change.Acknowledging its susceptibility to these issues,the Village had previously undertaken a Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP)in 2015.Now,as part of the RF Grant Program,the Village has secured funding to assess the impacts of flooding on critical assets.BCC Engineering,LLC,has been engaged to develop a comprehensive VA,analyzing the effects of sea- level rise,groundwater rise,and increased rainfall on significant assets within the Village,aligning with statutory requirements.This assessment utilizes the latest available data and integrates existing hydrologic and hydraulic models from the SWMP report. MIAMI BEACH «roar ±1IIEEE»I0 IE;BJ ZIIIIS II LB)II)SI-LI 9!AI)rt04 2924-2)4-3)9 be CITY-WIDE BRIDGE REHABILITATION SERVICES TASK WORK ORDER NO.4 - SERENA ST.PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS I CITY OF SARASOTA I SARASOTA,FL I WATER RESOURCE ENGINEER I Th is project consists of the design of a new pedestrian bridge extending from Serena Street right-of-w ay to the shopping plaza west of Beneva Road.Th e bridge needs to cro ss over a County-owned drainage ca nal.Sidew alk improvements necessary to connect the street to the pedestrian bridge ar e also included.Additional optional services for sidew alk extensions along Serena Street, Bailey Road and along the eastern bank of the drainage canal w est of the shopping plaza w est of Beneva Road will also be co nsidered.Sidew alk w ork includes tie-in connections at the new pedestrian bridge over County Canal,including all necessar y hardw are to meet ADA requirements.Th e sidewalk analysis shall include back-of-sidew alk profiles,and a matrix of impacts w ith breakdow n of cost and supporting documentation. Th e scope of w ork includes ro adw ay engineering,drainage and perm itting,a lighting design analysis report,aerial photogra phy,analysis of the existing hydraulic models,and other services as specified by the City. NORTH BAY VILLAGE STORM WATER MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT I NORTH BAY VILLAGE,FL I NORTH BAY VILLAGE,FL I WATER RESOURCE ENGINEERING DESIGNER I The Village,loca ted in M iami-Dade County,is a co astal municipality built on fill in Biscayne Bay, surro unded by an O utstanding Florida W ater (O FL)and within the Bisca yne Bay Aquatic Preserve.Comprising three man- made islands-N orth Bay Island,Har bour Island,and Treasure Island-the Village features a mix of single-fa mily homes,multi- fa mily dw ellings,and institutional buildings.W ith a population of around 9,]00 residents and co vering approximately 0.97 squar e miles,the Village faces challenges from rising sea levels, groundw ater,increased rainfall,and threats from hurricanes and storm surges.Additionally,the Village's infrastructure, including seaw alls and stor mw ater systems,is aging,leading to issues such as sunny-day flooding and standing water post- rainfa ll.To address these challenges and enhance community resilience,the Village has enlisted BCC to develop a com prehensive Stormw ater M aster Plan (SW M P).Th e SW M P aim s to protect infrastructure,improve stormw ater quality,and develop a prioritized capital improvement plan with funding altern atives by evaluating existing systems,analyzing future co nditions,and proposing strategies and policies. CITY OF LAUDERHILL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD PROTECTION MASTER PLAN I CITY OF LAUDERHILL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES I LAUDERHILL,FL I WATER RESOURCE ENGINEERING DESIGNER I The City falls within the boundar ies of M IAM I BEA C H MOHAMMAD SHOKRI,PHO RESILIENCY SPECIALIST the South Florida W ater Management District (SFW M D)C-12 East,C-12 W est and C-13 W est Basins.The existing drainage facilities within the City consist of canals and lakes that are inter- connected by culverts,bridges and control structures,which ultimately outfall to SFW M D'C-12 (i.e.North Fork New River) and C-13 (i.e.,Middle River)canals.These canals originate near the conservation areas in the west and primarily flow in a westerly direction,prior to the dischar ging into the Bay to the east.The allowable dischar ge to and for these canals based on SFW M D's 25-year 72-hour design storm event is regulated and limited to 90.6 and 75.9 cubic feet per second per square mile (CSM )for the C-12 and C-13 canal,respectively.To better assess the current and future flood protection level of services (FPIOS),o fully integrated one-dimensional (l D)and two- dimensional (2D)hydrologic/hydraulic (H&H)model will be developed.The softwar e for this effort consists of Streamline Technologies Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing M odel (ICPR4 ).BCC works closely with the City in identifying and evaluating feasible stormwater management practices to address areas that are not meeting the required FPLOS.This SM FPM P will include a short-range (5-year),mid-range- ra nge (l 0-year s),and long-range (15-year s)stormwater CIP that will take into consideration sea level and groundwater rise projections and the City's capital budget to address current high priority stormwater problem areas in a systematic manner, maximizing benefits per unit cost.This SM FPM P will also include preliminary conceptual schematics with planning-level co st estimates for the high-priority projects that will be included in the stormwater CIP. CITY OF LAUDERHILL STORM WATER SERVICES 20-YEAR NEEDS ASSESSMENT SUPPORT I CITY OF LAUDERHILL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES I LOCATION I LEAD HliH MODELER/PROJECT ENGINEER I BCC was contracted by the City of Lauderhill to assist in collecting and analyzing the necessar y data to complete the needs analysis.As par t of this,BCC created a summar y description of the City's stormwater management system;estimated quantities for City stormwater facilities, where applicable,including buried canal cross-culverts, buried pipes/storm drains,open ditches/conveyances (lined &unlined),storage or treatment basins [i.e.,wet or dry ponds), gro ss pollutant separ ators [i.e.,sediment tra ps,baffle boxes, etc.),stormwater treatment wetland systems,catch basins/ inlets,manholes,and exfiltration trenches.In addition,BCC estimated future stormwater facility expansions and respective costs for flood pro tection projects. 0o «assoc ±I)IEEE:III0 $EJIVEY YI SI'IAIIIS MIU LJIJIUII-LIS 30!Hr 2924-234-3/D9 bemneenng FIRM IN TERA,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 EDUCATION M S in Coastal and O ceanographic Engineering,University of Florida,1995 BS in M athem atics/ Applied Physics, M ar ietta College,1993 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Engineer, FL N o.57509,2001 Professional Engineer, M S N o.17411 ,2006 Pro fessional Engineer, LA N o.34065,2008 Pro fessional Engineer, N Y N o.090705,2012 (Inactive) Pro fessional Engineer, TX N o.113 783,2013 MICHAEL KRECIC,PE QUALITY CONTROL COASTAL ENGINEERING M r.Krecic's project experience includes design ot coastal structures [revetments,breakwaters, seaw alls,and groins)and construction tor urban waterfro nts,mar inas,and other projects. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PHASED DESIGN BUILD-SR A 1A EMERGENCY SEAWALL PROJECT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I FLAGLER AND VOLUSIA COUNTIES,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/COASTAL ENGINEER I Th e FD OT would like to install two seaw alls along SR Al A to protect the roadway from Atlantic Ocean hurrica ne surges and waves. O ne segment extends from the S.Central Avenue in Flagler County to one-half mile north of High Bridge Road in Volusia County (approximately 7,000 feet [f]).The other segment extends approx. 2,300 ft from Marlin Drive to Sunset Drive in Volusia County.Analyses included assessing historical beach profiles and shoreline changes,simulating shoreline responses to 50-year storms (with sea level rise)utilizing USACE's cross-shore ero sion model (SBEACH),and estimating local scour. LIBERTY ST.MARINA COASTAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SUPPORT AND FLUSHING STUDY I CITY OF JACKSONVILLE I JACKSONVILLE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/COASTAL ENGINEER I Developing wave and hydrodynamic conditions for daily and extreme conditions for a proposed new marina at the old county co urthouse par king lot, w hich was pile-supported over the St.Johns River.Additionally,assessing tidal circulation (flushing) of the pro posed basin to meet environmental regulatory requirements. OCEARCH PIER SHORELINE REVETMENT I CITY OF JACKSONVILLE I JACKSONVILLE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/COASTAL ENGINEER ]Designing a rock revetment for placement under and adjacent to the recently-constructed O C EARCH pier in M ayport along the St.Johns River. INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW OF THE MIAMI-DADE,FLORIDA COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT STUDY I U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING CENTER OF EXPERTISE,BALTIMORE DISTRICT, BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE I MIAMI-DADE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/COASTAL ENGINEER I Reviewed proposed tentatively selected plan,which includes beach nourishment (generally in hot spots). FLORIDA YACHT CLUB DESIGN-BUILD ROCK BREAKWATER WAVE MODELING AND ANALYSIS I FLORIDA YACHT CLUB I JACKSONVILLE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/SENIOR ENGINEER I As subcontractor,assessed rock stability,needed crest w idth and elevation,and wave transmission of rock breakwater,selected in lieu of a pile- supported vertical wave bar rier,to protect an existing marina.Evaluated marina basin disturbance (tra nquility)via CGW AVE wave model. 1-275 AT SUNSHINE SKYWAY SEAWALL PHASE II -WAVE ATTENUATION DEVICE DESIGN-BUILD I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MANATEE COUNTY,FL]PROJECT MANAGER/SENIOR ENGINEER]Project includes design, permitting,and construction of two breakwaters loca ted approximately 200 feet offshore the south Skyw ay fishing pier access road.Th e breakwaters intend to limit wave energy reaching the recently repaired seaw all and fishing pier access road and pro vide an area for seagrasses to grow behind the breakw ater as future environmental impact mitigation.Assessed stability of the devices under extreme conditions,resistance to settling and shifting,attenuation of wave energy at the existing seawall under different surge events,and sco ur at the breakwater ends. US 1 SHORELINE STABILIZATION STUDY I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -DISTRICT 51 REVARD COUNTY, FL I PROJECT MANAGER/SENIOR ENGINEER I As subcontractor,led feasibility study to identify alternatives M IA M I BEACH «ooocs ±I,III:EIII9 SE.II3 HI SL'IAII5III)LJJJ #1IE3 39!I r3no»39 2 4-234-) be ngineerin g that address ero sion occurring along an appro ximate 1.9-mile- long sect ion of ro adw ay embankment betw een US 1 and the Indian River Lagoon.Identified areas needing protection based on bank slopes steeper than design,distance from edge of pavem ent to shoreline,50-and 100-year wave energies along the shoreline,and ar eas w ith existing shoreline protect ion.Exam ined alternatives included revetments, near shore breakw aters,sills,and bulkheads constructed from a var iety of materials.Based on feasibility-level resolution to three subject s:engineering design,enviro nmental constra ints, and pro ject co sts,W AD sills appear most appropriate. TIMES-UNION BULKHEAD REPLACEMENT I CITY OF JACKSONVILLE I JACKSONVILLE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/SENIOR ENGINEER I As a subcontractor,determined 25-,50-,and 10 0-year hydro dynam ic co nditions (via ADC IRC and SW AN modeling) and provided scour depths,w ave forces,and wave overlapping ra tes for bulkhead lining the north bank of the St.Johns River from near the Acosta Bridge to the Hyatt Regency hotel. Wh ile the co nditions assessment included six segments (CSX, Tim es-Union,Jacks onville Landing,M ain St.Bridge,Landing Par king Lot,and Coastline Drive),this contract only covered replacem ent of the Times-Union bulkhead. POST-HURRICANES MATTHEW 120161 AND IRMA 120171 DUNE RESTORATION AND SEAWALL INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION I FLAGLER COUNTY I FLAGLER COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/SENIOR ADVISOR ]As a subcontra ctor,served as overa ll Q uality Assurance/ Q uality Contro l (Q A/Q C )lead on 1l.5-mile dune restoration project from the co unty line to the north end of Flagler Beach. Sand originated from tw o sand pro cessing (upland)plants located 50-60 miles from the sites.M anaged onsite beach observer.Served in similar ro le for Painters Hill vinyl seaw alls project,w hich includes an 815-ft section and a 433-ft section connect ing to an existing vinyl w all. U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MODEL CERTIFICATION REVIEW OF THE GENERATION II COASTAL RISK MODEL I BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, FL I U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS I PROJECT MANAGER/COASTAL ENGINEERING SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT I Evaluated the technica l quality,system quality,and usability of the Generation II Coastal M IA M I BEA C H MICHAEL KRECIC,PE Q UA LITY CO N TRO L CO A STA L EN G IN EERIN G Risk Model in accordance with USACE model certification/ review guidelines.The desktop model analyzes non-sacrificial coastal protection systems ([e.g.,seawalls and bulkheads)in a risk-based life cycle co ntext to help support the USACE in making decisions about proposed alternatives. SR A 1A FLAGLER COUNTY SEAWALL EXTENTS EVALUATION (SEGMENT 3)I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -DISTRICT 51 FLAGLER COUNTY,FL I SENIOR ENGINEER I In support of the FDOT PD&E study,evaluated the alongshore extents of a planned,one- mile-long seawall to protect the roadway (just north of Flagler Beach)following damage sustained during Hurrica ne M atthew (2016).Analyses centered on long-term shoreline changes and cross-shore ero sion modeling (SBEACH). Findings suggest possibly extending the wall alongshore south an additional 3,000 feet may prove warranted in the future.For the design phase,also estimated scour fronting the seawall and made reco mmendations for possible toe protection measures. Prepar ed roadway vulnera bility study with CCCLa model. Par ticipated in FDEP CCCL permitting meetings and weekly teleconferences. SR A 1A STEEL SHEET PILE WALL SCOUR DEPTH AND BEACH FILL EVALUATION I FLORIOA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I CITY OF Fl LAUDERDALE, FL I SENIOR ENGINEER/ENGINEER OF RECORD I Quantfied potential erosion and toe scour that an SR Al A seawall might experience to aid in design of a FDOT seawall proposed in response to erosion caused by Hurricane Sandy and Thanksgiving Day storm.For the City of Ft.Lauderdale,evaluated dune/beach fill alternatives placed in co njunction with FD OT seawall. Evaluations performed included SBEACH cross-shore erosion modeling.Calculated horizontal wave forces on seawall for final design.Delivered analyses to meet the expedited design schedule to ensure construction completion before the start of mar ine turtle nesting season.Coordinated closely with FDOT,the city,and their consultants to eliminate any potential schedule delays Permitting agencies approved the analyses without revision. ..CD «reoca ±IIEE7III 3JI3 {#SL)I II3 JI)))I)tI3 30!1Hr!ny 29 24 -2 34-31 ) be en9 g FIRM IN TERA ,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 34 EDUCATION PhD in Coastal and O ceanographic Engineering,University of Florida,1997 M S in N aval Architect ure and O ffshore Structures, University of California at Berkley,1992 BA in Engineering Science,Dar tmouth College,1990 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer (C iil),FL N o.54594, 1999 Professional Engineer (C ivil),LA N o.32466, 2006 Professional Engineer (C iil),SC N o.338455, 2020 MARK GOSSELIN,PHO,PE CO ASTAL EN G IN EER Dr.G osselin has served as pro ject manager on hundreds of sco ur and hydra ulics assessments of bridges and coastal structures throughout the co untry. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SANIBEL CAUSEWAY BRIDGE,LEE COUNTY,EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - DISTRICT 1 I LEE COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Project manager for the emergency and permanent repair pro ject to address the damage done to the Sanibel Island Causew ay corridor during the landfa ll of Hurricane Ion.Project involved forensic investigation into the mechanisms causing the failure, hindca sting Hurricane Ian,and developing the design of the protection fo r the seawalls and roadway throughout the project.W ork included both design build projects let fo r the co rridor. 1-275 AT SUNSHINE SKYWAY SEAWALL PHASE II -WAVE ATTENUATION DEVICE DESIGN-BUILD I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -DISTRICT 1 I MANATEE COUNTY,FL I QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER I Project includes design, permitting,and construct ion of tw o breakw aters loca ted approximately 200 feet offshore the south Skyw ay fishing pier access ro ad.Th e breakw aters intend to limit wave energy reaching the recently repaired seaw all and fishing pier access road and provide an area for seagra sses to grow behind the breakw ater as future environmental impact mitigation.Review ed all technica l work associated with the design and final documentation. HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE OVER OLD TAMPA BAY DESIGN BUILO I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -DISTRICT 1/TAMPA,FL I QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER I Q uality Control Reviewer for the Bridge Hydraulic Report supporting the replacement bridge design.Th is project involved co astal and hydra ulic support for the design of the replacement bridge.Th at includes developing the design hydraulic and wove conditions by applying an America n Association of State Highw ay and Transportation O fficials (AASHTO) Level 3 analysis,calculating the design scour at the bridge foundations and seawalls,developing the design w ave crest elevation,ca lculating w ave fo rces on the seawall,and the conceptual design of the shoreline/abutment pro tection.Th e Level 3 analysis employed a coupled SW AN+ADCI RC model driven by the historica l hurrica nes of record.Applying extremal analysis to the results from those sim ulations pro vided the input for the sco ur calculations,the development of the design wove crest, w ave fo rces,shoreline/abutment pro tection. HYDRAULIC AND SCOUR ANALYSIS FOR THE BEACH CORRIDOR RAPIO TRANSIT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY I MIAMI.FL I QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER I Provided quality co ntrol review for a project involving the design of a new bridge fo r a light rail connect Downtow n Miami with M iami Beach.To connect the tw o locations,the new bridge will cross the lntrocoastal W aterway Channel, parallel the M ain Channel at the Port of M iami,and cross Meloy Channel.Bridge fo undations located in these w aterw ays w ill be subject to local sco ur during hurricane events.Project involved 2D SW AN +ADCI RC modelling to simulate the hydraulics associated with hurricane storm surge and scour calculation. SR A 1A ROADWAY PERMANENT REPAIRS -SEGMENTS 1 6 3,DISTRICT 5 I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I FLAGLER COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Provided oversight of coastal engineering efforts,the report review ,and coordination w ith permitting efforts Pro ject involved the support of design of the seawall M IAM IBEA C H ««soi EIIEEE»IU E I3 TU)II I5 III)LJIJI0LI 39!1I r!no»29 24 -2 9 4-¥) bc in segm ent 3 (north end of the pro ject)via beach erosion modeling and a risk evaluation of a proposed revetment system in segm ent 1 (south end of the pro ject). BOULEVARD OF THE ARTS LIVING SHORELINE ANO SHORELINE PROTECTION DESIGN I CITY OF SARASOTA I SARASOTA,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I The city requested a conceptual design of the revetment shoreline protection at 1000 Boulevar d of the Arts and adjacent riprap breakw ater at 10 01.Th e intent of the breakw ater is to protect mangro ve plantings along the 10 01 pro perty creating a living shoreline.W ork fo r the project involved development of design w ave and surge cr iteria,sizing the ar mor stone protection fo r both the shoreline pro tection and the breakw ater,and determ ining both the horizontal and vertical extents of the coastal structures.All design ca lculations and recommendations w ere documented in a Coastal Engineering Design Report. SEAWALL MASTER PLAN !RESILIENCY STUOYJ I CITY OF FORT LAUOEROALE I FORT LAUOEROALE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Th e City of Fort Lauderdale issued a task w ork order under its Structural Engineering Consultant Services co ntract to develop a M aster Plan for all city ow ned seaw alls and shoreline.Th e master plan included inspection of all as sets,identification of any deficiencies or vulnera bilities,and the development of recom mendations to address these deficiencies.Responsible for the inspection of all city ow ned shorelines.Inspected shorelines at eight individual shoreline loca tions totaling approximately three m iles.Additional responsibilities included assessing shoreline vulnera bility,identifying corrective actions and providing recom m endations to address potential vulnera bility follow ing sea level rise w ithin a 25-and 50-year time frame. VENETIAN CAUSEWAY FROM NORTH BAYSHORE DRIVE IN MIAMI TO PURDY AVENUE IN MIAMI BEACH PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ANO ENVIRONMENT STUDIES I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER I Provided a quality control review for a project investigating replacement of tw elve bridges along Venetian Causew ay in M iami, M IAM I BEACH MARK GOSSELIN,PHD,PE COASTAL ENGINEER Florida as part of a PD&E studies for the FD OT.The project involved the calculation of the 50-,100-,and 500-year return period storm surge and wave climate via an application of the ADCI RC +SW AN softwar e.Additional work involved calculation of scour at the existing and proposed alternative,as well as the calculation of the wave forces on both the existing and pro posed superstructures. REHABILITATION OF BEAR CUT BRIDGE ON THE RICKENBACKER CAUSEWAYIMIAMI-DADE COUNTY I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER I Provided management oversight for the design-build project involving development of the design hydra ulic and sco ur par ameters at the bridge for a widening project.The hydraulic analysis included an application of ADCIRC to determine the 50-,100-,and 500-year return period storm surge conditions at the bridge crossing.The project also involved application of the FDOT rock sco ur procedure to determine the local scour in the near -surface rock layer.Testing of the rock indicated that the scour resistant material would produce less scour,which resulted in lower design embedment depths for the widened portion substructure. COASTAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF THE PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -DISTRICT 6 I MIAMI,FL I ENGINEER OF RECORD I Provided project management and served as engineer of record for the coastal engineering aspects of the design for the Port of M iami Tunnel connecting Dodge and W atson Islands.Th e project involved developing,ca librating, and simulating the 50-,10 0-,and 500-year return period hurricane genera ted surge elevations and wave climate.The pro ject also involved estimating wave forces and overtopping rates for a temporar y co nstruction wall under multiple return period conditions,development of shoreline protection at the construction site,and flood elevations at the port operations facilities. «osaca EI0IIEE3III0 EL)JIVE3 1JI!III3 MIU LJIJ SILE3 39!1I !ny ±924-234-)0 FIRM INTERA,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 28 EDUCATION MS in Coastal Engineering,University of Florida,1997 BS in Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University,1995 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer,FL No.58200,2002 Professional Engineer,TX No.103882,2009 MICHAEL TRUDNAK,PE COASTAL ENGINEER Michael Trudnak is a Coastal Engineer with over 26 years of experience focusing on coastal process analyses and developing beach and inlet management solutions. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE BEACH RESTORATION DESIGN AND PERMITTING SERVICES I VOLUSIA COUNTY I VOLUSIA COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/ SENIOR COASTAL ENGINEER I Currently directing the completion of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)and U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)permit modification requests for two separate projects to allow beach placement of beach quality dredge materials.The first project will place approximately 600,000 cy of material along 5 miles of New Smyrna Beach;the fill material will be transported via hydraulic pipeline from Florida Inland Navigation District's (FIND) Maintenance Spoil Area (MSA)434/434C South (a k a.Rattlesnake Island)The second project will place up to 700,000 cy of material along segments of Ponce Inlet,Wilbur-By-The-Sea,Daytona Beach Shores,and Daytona Beach;the fill material will be trucked from an on-beach stockpile of inlet and ICWW maintenance dredge material that USACE's dredging contractor will construct.Work involves beach fill design,environmental assessments and surveys,state and federal permitting,and close coordination with several government entities including USACE,FIND,FDEP,and the County. ALPINE GROVES PARK SHORELINE RESTORATION I ST.JOHNS COUNTY I ST.JOHNS COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/ SENIOR COASTAL ENGINEER I Hurricanes Matthew (2016)and Irma (2017)caused severe erosion of the shoreline and geologically unique bluff (-17'high)of Alpine Groves Park,located along the eastern shoreline of the St.Johns River,producing a near vertical escarpment along the majority of the park's un-protected shoreline and undermining and falling several large diameter historic oak trees.Provided design and permitting services and bidding assistance for a hard shoreline stabilization structure to restore and prevent further erosion of the bluff The selected design,best meeting the County's goals and objectives,consists of a rock rip rap revetment designed to minimize impacts to existing wetland vegetation,prevent bluff erosion,and minimize future maintenance requirements.Conducted a site assessment including mapping/characterization of environmental resources and a wetland delineation survey;project design,from conceptual design thru final design,for a shoreline revetment and bluff restoration,including fill and grading and native plantings;permitting,via the USACE and the St.Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD);developed technical specifications and construction drawings;prepared an Opinion of Probable Cost;and assisted with bidding,Contracted to provide construction administration services for project construction,anticipated to commence late winter 2024. T-HEAD GROIN DESIGN FOR PUERTO LOS CABOS I PUERTO LOS CABOS I CABO SAN LUCAS,B.C.S.,MEXICO I PROJECT MANAGER/LEAD COASTAL ENGINEER I As project manager and lead coastal engineer,developed a T-Head groin field design to address severe erosion downdrift of the jettied port entrance.Established design conditions by developing an ADC I RC +SWAN model of the Eastern Pacific to hindcast Hurricane Odile and simulate the prior 34-years of wave climate at the project site,designed the groin field layout and structure elevations,and recommended armor stone sizes. MIAMI BEACH o QUEENS HARBOUR YACHT 6 COUNTRY CLUB LIVING SHORELINE PROJECT I QUEENS HARBOUR YACHT G COUNTRY CLUB I JACKSONVILLE,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/LEAD COASTAL ENGINEER I Designed and permitted a living shoreline consisting of oyster shell filled gabions and spartina plantings along 1,000 ft of marsh shoreline to reduce siltation in the Queens Harbour Yacht &Country Club's entry channel and mitigate chronic marsh erosion along the north bank of the channel.Coordinated with Florida Department of Environmental Protection,Division of State lands,client, and surveyor to execute a boundary line agreement and private sovereign submerged lands easement.Assisted with bid administration and executing the construction contract. Currently providing construction administration services. HERNANDO COUNTY ARTIFICIAL REEF PROGRAM I HERNANDO COUNTY I CITRUS COUNTY,FL I LEAD COASTAL ENGINEER I Under subcontract to Water &Air Research,Inc.,developed conceptual designs for 15 potential artificial reef sites,including 8 nearshore sites located approximately 9 miles offshore of Hernando Beach, 3 midshore sites approximately 13-15 miles offshore,and 4 offshore sites approximately 19 miles offshore.To assess the stability of manufactured concrete reef modules and limestone boulders at the various reef sites under 25-,50-,and 100-yr storm conditions,I NT ERA applied the SWAN wave propagation model to analyze the storm wave climate,calculated design wave forces acting on the proposed reefs,evaluated which reef modules can withstand based on weight,geometry,and other design elements the wave forces,and calculated suitable limestone boulder sizes.Computed scalable conceptual-level cost estimates for the mobilization,material,and construction of the conceptual artificial reef designs.Summarized results in a report to facilitate discussions regarding selection of the top ten preferred sites and reef designs to carry into the permitting phase. CITRUS COUNTY ARTIFICIAL REEF PROGRAM I CITRUS COUNTY I CITRUS COUNTY,FL I LEAD COASTAL ENGINEER I Reviewed the characteristics of 20 potential artificial reef sites and identified the 10 most suitable sites for further evaluation.Computed a feasibility- level cost estimate including mobilization,materials,and MIAMI BEACH MICHAEL TRUDNAK,PE COASTAL ENGINEER construction costs of the proposed artificial reefs. SUMMER HAVEN REVETMENT DESIGN-BUILD I ST.JOHNS COUNTY I ST. JOHNS COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/SENIOR COASTAL ENGINEER I This Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)- funded project consists of restoring an existing rock revetment along the Atlantic Ocean shoreline after damages incurred during Hurricane Matthew.In lieu of the revetment,INTERA recommended the contractor propose a seawall with some additional rock to reduce costs and meet the FEMA funding restrictions.Calculated scour,toe berm rock sizes,and wave overlapping rates (to assist others'drainage analysis). FORT PIERCE SHORE PROTECTION PROJECT SECTION 203 FEASIBILITY STUDYIST.LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT I ST.LUCIE COUNTY,FL I PROJECT MANAGER/LEAD COASTAL ENGINEER I As project manager and lead coastal engineer,prepared a Section 203 Feasibility Study to extend the federal authorization 50 years and determine the National Economic Development Plan to decrease non- uniformity of shoreline erosion and increase the nourishment interval.This was the first study in the nation prepared by the non- federal interest for direct submission to the Assistant Secretary of the Army Civil Works (ASACW)under authorization of Section 203 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act (WRDA)of 2014.The study was approved by Office of Management and Budget,USACE Headquarters,and ASACW and currently awaits federal authorization in the next WRDA bill. ECONOMIC AND NATURAL RESOURCE BENEFITS STUDY I TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE I AUSTIN,TX I PROJECT MANAGER/LEAD ENGINEER I Assisted the Texas General land Office (GlO)with compliance of their legislative requirement to report the economic and natural resource benefits derived from Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act (CEPRA)construction projects every biennium. Supervised and performed benefit analyses for numerous shore protection and environmental restoration construction projects. Economic and financial benefits included those associated with commercial and recreational fishing,water quality, carbon sequestration,ground water recharge,property values, recreation,out-of-state visitor spending,and storm protection. «moo6o ±IEEE533JIVE3 1/J3III18 I)1)II)ltIE3 10±11fry 2924-234-)) begneerng FIRM GCES Engineering Services,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 34 EDUCATION MS in Engineering (Geotechnical) University of Detroit, Michigan,1991 BS in Civil Engineering, 1986 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer, Florida No.59426 ALEJANDRO MONTENEGRO,PE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER Mr.Montenegro has over 30 years of professional experience in the fields of Geotechnical Engineering,Materials Testing &Engineering Inspection,with a strong history of projects related experience in the public and private sector.During his many years of professional experience,Mr. Montenegro held numerous positions including Office Manager,Division Manager,Department Manager,QC Project Manager,Project Geotechnical Engineer and Staff Engineer.He also assumed executive management positions during a period of eleven years in charge of two major engineering/ construction consulting firms in South Florida. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SEAWALLS I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I GCES performed geotechnical exploration for the design of the seawall replacements.The work included Standard Penetration Test (SPT)borings to provide design and construction recommendations. SEAWALL REPLACEMENT AT 48TH ST ANO 29TH ST I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I This project was completed as part of BCC's Professional A&E Services Agreements with the City of Miami Beach.The replacements will consist of new precast panel and pile seawalls at 48th St and North Bay Rd (±60')and 29th St and Flamingo Dr(±40')CC is also providing permitting services (MB Building Dept.,SFWMD and the MDC RER),a benthic survey and geotechnical report for each seawall (provided by the supporting subconsultant team),structural and civil engineering services for the project.Services also include bidding support,construction administration support and project closeout services. NORTH BAY VILLAGE SEAWALLS I NORTH BAY VILLAGE I NORTH BAY VILLAGE,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Project consisted of a single 40-foot diameter tank adjacent to two 80 foot diameter tanks.A total of two SPT borings were drilled at the project sites.This report describes the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings,analyzes and evaluates the test data,and provides recommendations regarding the geotechnical design and construction of foundations for the proposed bulkhead. REPLACEMENT BULKHEAD AND DOCK DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INN ON THE BAY I PRIME ENGINEERING,INC I BROWARD COUNTY,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Completed a subsurface exploration at the Port Everglades tank farm for the constructing of l6 new tanks ranging in diameter from 80 feet to 150 feet.The work included Standard Penetration Test (SPT)borings,ex-filtration tests,a description of the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings,analyzed and evaluated the test data,and provided design and construction recommendations for earthwork and foundations for the proposed aboveground storage tanks and containment wall. PORT OF MIAMI -NORTH CRUISE BLVD.EXTENSION-PHASE IIB,FLYOVER BRIDGE I PORT OF MIAMI I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Project consisted the construction of a new flyover bridge structure at the Port of Miami.Geotechnical services included field exploration and laboratory testing and foundation design of the proposed structure.Several foundation alternatives were evaluated including shallow foundations,square precast prestressed concrete (SPC)piles,steel piles,straight sided drilled shafts and auger cast pile (ACP).Auger cast piles alternative was the preferable foundation system for the project. MIAMI BEACH «aoa ±IUIIEIIIJ YE-JI:BJ YI 'ZIAIIJ AII)LJIIIE1III3 39!Irr4 294-234-3)) be gineerin g PORT OF MIAMI CRUISE TERMINAL B ANO C CONVERSION TO "C"I PORT OF MIAMI I MIAMI-OAOE COUNTY,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Project consisted of the construction of new runw ays,renovations of existing runw ays extension and construction new canvas canopy structures.Responsible for the geotechnical exploration required to explore and evaluate the subsurface conditions at Cruise Terminals B and C.Geotechnical recommendations included deep fo undations for new runw ays and existing runw ays extension and for the proposed canvas canopy in front of the term inals. PORT MIAMI BASIN 9141 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION I PORT OF MIAMI I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I E 15- SEA-02 -Defining soil design par ameters (i.e.unit weights, angle of friction and earth pressure co efficients)fo r design of temporar y shoring system for gra vity pipelines,force mains, storm dra ins and ca tch basins excavations. PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL I BOUYGUES CIVIL WORKS FLORIDA [BCWFJ I MIAMI, FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Th e pro ject consisted of constructing soil-cement panels using utter soil mixing (CSM )technique. W orks involves laboratory services,including Triaxial tests, Unconfined Compression,hydrometer,specific gravity and field services including grout sampling \testing and core of co mpacted limerock material above the tunnel. M IA M I BEA C H ALEJANDRO MONTENEGRO,PE G EO TEC H N IC A L EN G IN EER PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL WATSON ISLAND SUPPORT OF EXCAVATION I MALCOLM DRILLING I MIAMI,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Provided geotechnical drilling services (Borehole Inclination and Direction Services)during the co nstruction of the Cutter Soil Mixing W all (CSM )Field services included verifica tion drilling, field fa lling head permeability and field instrumentation such as inclinometers and video flat project 360°camera. PORT OF MIAMI TUNNEL I NICHOLSON CONSTRUCTION CO.I MIAMI,FL I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I The project consists of constructing soil- cement panels using utter soil mixing (CSM }technique.Works involves laboratory services,including Unconfined Compression and Triaxial test to at different confining stress levels in order to develop a Mohr-Stress Envelope and determine the angle of internal friction of the Bentonite/Cement for specified intervals. DEEP WATER DOCKING I PORT OF PUERTO CABELLO I PETROLEUM OF VENEZUELA (PVSA)EL PALITO REFINERY,VENEZUELA I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Foundation design for the ship mooring structures for the PDVSA dock refinery.Foundation subjected to lateral loads and very high axial and uplift loads.W ork also included overseeing pier modifications,co nstruction and repairs and bulkhead replacements. DEEP WATER DOCKING I PORT OF PUERTO CABELLO I PETROLEUM OF VENEZUELA PVSA)EL PALITO REFINERY,VENEZUELA I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I Senior supervising geotechnical engineer for the offshore geotechnical investigation and responsible for the engineering analyses including ultimate pile ca pacity and lateral load analysis under static and cycle conditions. 0o «o»soc+ENIIIEEE.II)SEID;10)III18 III)1JIU IE1I3;»9!IHtnty 2024-294-3/9 FIRM Manuel G.Vera & Associates,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 41 EDUCATION BS,Legal Studies,Nova Southeastern University, 1994 Associates of Science, Land Surveying,Miami Dade College,1988 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Surveyor and Mapper,Florida No.LS5291,1994 MANNY VERA JR.,PSM PROJECT SURVEYOR Mr.Vera Jr.has managed a variety of survey contracts and projects for multiple contracts in both the public and private sectors.He possesses extensive experience in the management and coordination of survey projects involving various techniques such as Aerial Surveys,Conventional Ground Surveying,and Utilities Designation,among others. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SEAWALLS I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV performed surveying services,which included establishing Horizontal and Vertical control on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone,and North American Datum (NAD)6f 1983/2011 Adjustment,as well as on NAVD88 vertical datum.The topographic survey located all above-ground features and improvements within the survey limits,including fences,walls,buildings,appurtenances, visible above-ground utilities,drainage structures,seawalls,top of seawalls,and canal soundings. The wet face of each seawall was identified either by actual survey or by clearly measuring the lip of the seawall cap and the wet face.The rights-of-way were established within the survey limits,and R/W lines were depicted on the Topographic Survey. BEACH VIEW PARK,5301 COLLINS AVE I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV performed surveying services at Beach Park View,which included a Boundary Survey,the Placement of Monuments at all major corners of the property's boundary,the establishment of Right- of-Way lines in accordance with Right of Way Maps,the Surveying of Platted and/or dedicated Right-of-Ways where applicable,the identification of Flood Zone Designations,a Topographic Survey,Elevation measurements,the establishment of the Coastal Construction Control Line,and the establishment of Benchmarks PIPELINE CROSSINGS SURVEY I AECOM I MIAMI BEACH,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV was responsible for performing Design Survey and SUE services,including Topographic survey,DTM survey, Horizontal and Vertical Control survey,Bathymetric survey,Submerged Sovereign Lands Assessments, Underground Utilities Survey,and Subsurface Utility Designating and Locating conditions.Work zone survey safety was provided as required by applicable standards. SMALL DIAMETER PIPELINE SURVEY I AECOM I MIAMI BEACH,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV was responsible for performing Design Survey and SUE services,including Topographic survey,DTM survey,Horizontal and Vertical Control survey,Bathymetric survey,Underground Utilities Survey,and Subsurface Utility Designating and Locating conditions.Work zone survey safety was provided as required by applicable standards. NORMANDY ISLE GENERATOR G WATER PUMP STATION I AECOM I MIAMI BEACH,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV was responsible for providing Design Survey and Underground Utilities services.The scope of work included Horizontal control locating on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone,and North American Datum (NAD)of 1983 /1990 Adjustment,Vertical Control locating on the NAVO 88 vertical datum,alignment,and existing right-of-way lines.Additionally,MGV was responsible for preparing topographic and digital terrain 3D models (DTM),locating topographic features such as existing lighting,pavement markings,trees,pedestrian ramps,driveways,visible MIAMI BEACH «woos+±IIE3III0II,J YU1LI.III3JIU LU'II SELIE3 39!Ir!fy 2924-234-3) above-gro und utilities,sodded and paved areas,dra inage structures (including rim/gutter elevations),etc.For Subsurfa ce Utility Designations-Q uality Level B,M G V designated know n existing toneable and non-toneable subsurfa ce utilities, including gro und-penetrating ra dar (G PR),and implemented W ork Zone Safety measures as required by M iami-Dade County and FD O T standar ds. SR9O /TAMIAMI TRAIL FILL PAD REMOVAL AT 5 SITES WITHIN ENP I HDR I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MG V was tasked w ith co nducting a Design Survey fo r five (5)sites along SR90/Ta miam i Tra il.Th e scope of services included Horizontal and Seco ndary Vertical surveys,as well as To pogra phic and DTM surveys for these five sites,w ith the survey ar ea extending approxim ately l O feet beyond the site boundar ies Furthermore, M G V ensured the precise identification and inco rporation of all w etlands'stakes and lines established by H DR into the topogra phic survey.Any necessar y line cutting to facilitate the survey process w as car ried out as needed. COMMUTER RAIL FEC NE CORRIDOR I PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I M GV w as responsible for pro viding Survey and Subsurface Utility Engineering services for the project limits requested by the County,w hich included l5 side streets,5 par ks,5 bridges cro ssing canals,and 6 bridge cro ssings.Th e scope of services encompassed the establishment of Horizontal Project Netw ork Control (H PN C )on the Florida State Plane coordinate system, East zone,and N orth America n Datum (N AD)of 1983 /2011 Adjustm ent,as w ell as the establishment of horizontal values (X,Y,Z)It also involved establishing Vertical Project Control N etw ork on the N AVD 88 vertical datum,recording elevations in M obile LiDAR,setting,locating,maintaining,and establishing M obile LiD AR tar gets.The tasks extended to performing a 3D topogra phic/DTM Survey,conducting a Bridge survey using 3D High-Definition laser technology,surveying up to 50 com pleted geotechnica l bores,and providing horizo ntal and vertical (X,Y,Z)values Finally,MG V was responsible for perfo rm ing the Sectional/G rant Survey and Subdivision Loca tions as needed to establish the right of way and pro viding up to 300 quality Level A locates (test holes) DISTRICT WIDE MISCELLANEOUS LOCATION SURVEY CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 6 I DISTRICTWIDE,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I Ta sk driven co ntract performing miscellaneous Loca tion Surveys in M iami-Dade and M onroe Counties,and all municipalities within the district.M G V is responsible for all necessar y professional surveying and mapping services to support topographic and M IA M I BEACH MANNY VERA JR.,PSM SURVEYOR mapping projects.Most of these services utilize a co mbination of mobile surveying and mapping technologies with GNSS and conventional survey technologies for ground control, quality assurance,and supplementar y topographic map data when necessary.Th e surveys will include,but not be limited to:terrestrial mobile LiDAR surveying &mapping,ground control,scheduling of activities,drainage information,design level surveys,specific purpose surveys,acquisition parcel stakeout,project co ntrol network,right of way control survey maps,acquisition right of way maps,maintenance maps, retracement,reco very,and analysis of historical baselines of survey,boundary surveys,par cel sketches,legal descriptions, and properties title analysis. VILLAGE OF PINECREST KENDALL DRIVE I KIMLEY-HORN I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I CHIEF SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV was responsible for providing Design Survey and Subsurface Utility designating and locating services.Scope of services included:Horizontal and Vertical control,Survey Baseline and Right of Way, To pographic survey was performed from right of way to right of way and l O'south of the south right of way along the project limits.Survey will extend approximately 50-ft along intersecting side-streets.All above ground features and improvements, break-lines,high and low points will be located with sufficient density of points to create a DTM .All topogra phic features will be located including existing lighting,pavement markings, trees,pedestrian ramps,driveways,visible above ground utilities,sodded and paved areas,pedestrian ramps,drainage structures,etc.The incoming bus driveway area is located on the west side of the station,and it is under the existing station gar age structure.M GV also provided Utility Designates/scans for up to 4 areas (quadrants for mast arms or 10'radius sca ns for dra inage structures).Once the design team reviewed the Utility Designates,MGV pro vided up to 25 Utility Locates (Test Holes)on specific utility co nflicts as identified by the EOR.A dra inage survey was perfo rmed and identified the type of structure,rim elevation,pipe invert elevation,pipe materials, direction,size,and condition.Sectional/Grant Survey and Subdivision loca tions,W ork Zone Safety,as well as Project Network Control Sheets were provided. «soc ±III±II0 ±.3)JI:35 11.L')\01J 4/I)L)JIU 3'UELIE3»9±1crfrto»u92 4-234-34D FIRM M anuel G .Vera & A ssociates,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 27 EDUCATION BS Civil Engineering, Florida International University,2007 AS Land Surveying, M iami Dade College, 2003 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Pro fessional Surveyor 8 M apper,Florida License N o.:LS6669, 2008 Engineering Intern, Florida License N o.: 1100011603,2007 CARLOS ALONSO,PSM SURVEYOR M r.Alonso is proficient in CAICE,G EO PAK,Micro Station,AutoCAD,Trimble,GPSurvey,Trimble Geomatics O ffice,Hector,EFBP,Terramodel,as well as numero us other survey and office software. In addition,he has field experience with severa l instruments and data collectors.Mr.Alonso is up to date w ith current technology and is well-tra ined in the latest technology,including Laser Scanning. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SEAWALLS I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV performed surveying services,which included establishing Horizontal and Vertical control on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,Ea st Zone,and North American Datum (NAD)of 1983/2011 Adjustment,as well as on NAVD88 vertical datum The topographic survey located all above-ground features and improvements within the survey limits,including fences,walls,buildings,appurtenances, visible above-gro und utilities,dra inage structures,seawalls,top of seawalls,and canal soundings. Th e w et face of each seawall was identified either by actual survey or by clear ly meas uring the lip of the seaw all cap and the wet face.Th e rights-of-way were established within the survey limits,and R/W lines w ere depicted on the To pographic Survey. HIGH SCHOOL PEDESTRIAN I KIMLEY-HORN I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV was responsible for providing Design Survey and Subsurface Utility Location services.Th e scope of services included Horizontal and Vertical Control,Survey Baseline and Right of Way,Topographic Survey, and DTM 3D-M odeling,which was performed from the center of the canal to the Northwesterly Right of w ay line of Dade Boulevard.M GV also provided Utility Designation and Location services for design purposes only.A dra inage survey was conducted,identifying the type of structure,rim elevation,pipe invert elevation,pipe materials,direction,size,and co ndition.Additionally,Bridge Survey,Sectional/G ra nt Survey,and Subdivision Location services were provided,along with Work Zone Safety measures and Project Network Control Sheets. BEACH VIEW PARK,5301 COLLINS AVE I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,Fl I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I M G V performed surveying services at Beach Par k View,which included a Boundary Survey,the Placement of M onuments at all major corners of the property's boundary,the establishment of Right- of-W ay lines in acco rdance with Right of W ay Maps,the Surveying of Platted and/or dedicated Right-of-W ays where applicable,the identification of Flood Zone Designations,a To pographic Survey,Elevation measurements,the establishment of the Coastal Construction Control Line,and the establishment of Benchmar ks. PIPELINE CROSSINGS SURVEY-TASK #1 I AECOM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV w as responsible for performing Design Survey and SUE services,including Topographic survey, DTM survey,Horizontal and Vertica l Contro l survey,Bathymetric survey,Submerged Sovereign Lands Assessments,Underground Utilities Survey,and Subsurface Utility Designating and Locating co nditions.W ork zone survey safety was pro vided as required by applicable standards. SMALL DIAMETER PIPELINE SURVEY -TASK #2 I AECOM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,Fl I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I M G V w as responsible fo r performing Design Survey ond SUE services,including Topographic survey, DTM survey,Horizontal and Vertical Control survey,Bathymetric survey,Underground Utilities M IA M I BEA C H ooosos EIIIEEEIIIJ S:II I3 JS:IAIII8 JI)LIU I1IE; 30±It ri0y 2024-234-3/9 Survey,and Subsurfa ce Utility Designating and Locating conditions.W ork zone survey safety was provided as required by applica ble standar ds. NORMANDY ISLE GENERATOR G WATER PUMP STATION I AECOM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV was responsible fo r providing Design Survey and Underground Utilities services.Th e sco pe of w ork included Horizontal control locating on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,Ea st Zone,and N orth American Datum (N AD)of 1983 /1990 Adjustment,Vertical Control locating on the NAVD 88 vertica l datum,alignm ent,and existing right-of-w ay lines Additionally, M G V was responsible fo r prepar ing topographic and digital terra in 3D models (DTM ),locating topographic features such as existing lighting,pavement mar kings,trees,pedestrian ra mps, drivew ays,visible above-ground utilities,sodded and paved ar eas,dra inage structures (including rim/gutter elevations), etc.For Subsurfa ce Utility Designations-Q uality Level B, M G V designated know n existing toneable and non-toneable subsurface utilities,including gro und-penetrating radar (GPR), and im plemented W ork Zone Safety measures as required by M iam i-Dade County and FD O T standar ds. MEDICAL CAMPUS PARKING GARAGE FORCE MAIN I CHEROKEE ENTERPRISES,INC I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I M G V provided all aspect s of Construction Surveying including the stake out,field as-built and as-built plans of the Force M ain approved by M iami-Dade County Water and Sew er Depar tment.Force M ain services included:layout of proposed pipe at 100 feet intervals including valves,bends, etc.;as-built pipe at maximum of 5-feet intervals;prepar e as-built plans fo r W ASD appro val.Some of the co nstruction surveying services provided include:horizontal and vertical co ntrol pro ject netw ork;layout drainage structures;layout light poles,w iring pull boxes;layout roadw ay ear thw ork (berms, embankments);layout roadw ay base /blur tops;layout concr ete pavem ent at intersections;layout curb and gutter (1600 LF);layout drivew ays;layout sidew alks and path;layout single support signs;layout signalization and traffic monitoring site;layout guar d rails;layout overflow structures and rip-raps; layout Landsca pe;miscellaneous M O T layouts;prepare final roadw ay as-built;and reestablish primar y netw ork control. MIAMI BEACH CARLOS ALONSO,PSM SURVEYOR DISTRICTWIDE MISCELLANEOUS LOCATION SURVEY CONSULTANT I FOOT DISTRICT 61 DISTRICTWIDE,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I Task driven contract performing miscellaneous Location Surveys in M iami-Dade and M onroe Counties,and all municipalities within the district.M GV is responsible for all necessary professional surveying and mapping services to support topographic and mapping projects.M ost of these services utilize a combination of mobile surveying and mapping technologies with GNSS and conventional survey technologies for ground control, quality assura nce,and supplementar y topographic map data when necessar y.The surveys will include,but not be limited to:terrestrial mobile LiDAR surveying &mapping,ground control,scheduling of activities,drainage information,design level surveys,specific purpose surveys,acquisition parcel stakeout,project co ntrol network,right of way control survey maps,acquisition right of way maps,maintenance mops, retra cement,recovery,and analysis of historical baselines of survey,boundary surveys,parcel sketches,legal descriptions, and pro perties title analysis. MIAMI TO MIAMI BEACH LIGHT RAIL /MODERN STREETCAR [MIAMI BEACH CORRIDOR CONNECTOR)PD&E I PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP,INC I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I Project Limits:M iami Transit Connector from Alton Road and 5th Street in Miami Beach west along the Macarthur Causeway (1-395), south along Biscayne Boulevar d to Government Center station and north along NW /NE 1st Avenue and North Miami Avenue to NE 41 st Street in Midtown M iami.MG V is performing adequate resear ch to graphically establish the existing right of way fo r planning purposes of the Miami portion of the project limits,and design survey tasks will be performed:horizontal pro ject network co ntrol;survey baseline and right of way; topographic/DTM survey performed along the MacArthur Causeway;topographic (2D)survey will be performed from right of way to right of way and will extend to the radius return on all intersecting side-streets along the project limits;sectional survey and subdivision locations for survey bas eline and right of way lines;miscellaneous survey locating vertical clearances over pavement signaling mast arms,bridges and signs;PNC sheets with horizontal values only,as well as station and off-set for the entire project limits;and pro vide work zone safety. a»soar ±III1IEE±RIJS±II3 71;LIII18 II)LI)II)ULJ0IE3 39!I+r!no1 2024 294-3) FIRM M anuel G .Vera & Associates,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 36 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Land Surveying, University of Florida, 1988 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Surveyor and M apper,Florida N o.LS5266,1993 MARK SOWERS,PSM SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING SPECIALIST M r.Sow ers is a Professional Surveyor &M apper with 36 year s of experience throughout the state of Florida.His responsibilities include managing field opera tions,establishing standards for consultants, and co nducting final quality assura nce/quality control of all delivera bles before client submission.He is proficient in the latest industry technology and skilled in developing and implementing successful management stra tegies. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SEAWALLS I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I MGV performed surveying services,which included establishing Horizontal and Vertical control on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,Ea st Zone,and North America n Datum (NAD)6f 1983/2011 Adjustment,as w ell as on NAVD88 vertical datum.The topographic survey located all above-ground features and improvements within the survey limits,including fences,walls,buildings,appurtenances, visible above-ground utilities,dra inage structures,seawalls,top of seawalls,and ca nal soundings. The w et face of each seaw all was identified either by actual survey or by clearly measuring the lip of the seaw all ca p and the wet fa ce.Th e rights-of-way were established within the survey limits,and R/W lines w ere depicted on the To pogra phic Survey. PIPELINE CROSSINGS SURVEY -TASK #1 I AECOM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/ SUE DIRECTOR I M GV was responsible for performing Design Survey and SUE services,including To pogra phic survey,DTM survey,Horizontal and Vertical Control survey,Bathymetric survey, Submerged Sovereign Lands Assessments,Underground Utilities Survey,and Subsurface Utility Designating and Locating conditions.Th e work zone survey safety was provided as required by applica ble standar ds. SMALL DIAMETER PIPELINE SURVEY -TASK #2 I AECOM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/ SUE DIRECTOR I M G V was responsible fo r perfo rming Design Survey and SUE services,including To pographic survey,DTM survey,Horizontal and Vertical Control survey,Bathymetric survey, Underground Utilities Survey,and Subsurface Utility Designating and Locating co nditions.The work zone survey safety was pro vided as required by applica ble standards. NORMANDY ISLE GENERATOR &WATER PUMP STATION I AECOM I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/SUE DIRECTOR I M GV was responsible for pro viding Design Survey and Underground Utilities services.The scope of work included Horizontal control locating on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone,and North American Datum (NAD)of 1983 /1990 Adjustment, Vertica l Control locating on the NAVD 88 vertica l datum,alignment,and existing right-of-way lines. Additionally,MG V w as responsible for prepar ing topographic and digital terrain 3 D models (DTM), loca ting topogra phic features such as existing lighting,pavement mar kings,trees,pedestrian ramps, drivew ays,visible above-gro und utilities,sodded and paved areas,drainage structures (including rim/gutter elevations),etc.Fo r Subsurface Utility Designations-Q uality Level B,MGV designated know n existing toneable and non-toneable subsurface utilities,including ground-penetrating radar (G PR),and implemented W ork Zone Safety measures as required by Miami-Dade County and FD OT standar ds. M IAM I BEACH «nos EIIIE-III0 $IE3 HJ SJIIIL3 JIU LI'III)"IIIELI3 J9!If0 2924·234-349 be DISTRICT WIDE MISCELLANEOUS LOCATION SURVEY CONSULTANT I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6 I DISTRICTWIDE,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/SUE DIRECTOR I Ta sk driven contract perform ing miscellaneous Location Surveys in M iami-Dade and M onr oe Counties,and all municipalities within the district. M G Y is responsible for all necessary professional surveying and mapping services to support topographic and mapping pro jects.M ost of these services utilize a combination of mobile surveying and mapping technologies with G N SS and conventional survey technologies fo r gro und contro l, quality assurance,and supplementar y topographic map data w hen necessar y.Th e surveys w ill include,but not be limited to:terrestrial mobile LiDAR surveying &mapping,gro und co ntrol,scheduling of activities,dra inage information,design level surveys,specific purpose surveys,acquisition par cel stakeout,project contro l netw ork,right of w ay co ntrol survey maps,acquisition right of w ay maps,maintenance maps, retracem ent,recovery,and analysis of historical baselines of survey,boundar y surveys,par cel sketches,legal descriptions, and pro perties title analysis. VILLAGE OF PINECREST KENDALL DRIVE I KIMLEY-HORN I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/SUE DIRECTOR I M G Y w as responsible for pro viding Design Survey and Subsurface Utility designating and loca ting services.Sco pe of services included:Horizontal and Vertica l control,Survey Baseline and Right of W ay,To pogra phic survey was performed from right of w ay to right of w ay and 10'south of the south right of way along the pro ject limits.Survey w ill extend appro ximately 50- ft along intersecting side-streets.All above ground features and impro vements,break-lines,high and low points will be loca ted w ith sufficient density of points to create a DTM .All topographic features w ill be loca ted including existing lighting, pavement markings,trees,pedestrian ramps,driveways,visible above ground utilities,sodded and paved areas,pedestrian ram ps,drainage structures,etc.Th e incoming bus drivew ay ar ea is located on the w est side of the station,and it is under the existing station gara ge structure.M G Y also pro vided Utility Designates/scans for up to 4 ar eas (quadrants for mast arms or 10'ra dius sca ns fo r drainage structures).O nce the design team review ed the Utility Designates,M G V provided up to 25 Utility Locates (Test Holes)on specific utility co nflicts as identified by the EO R.A drainage survey w as perfo rmed and identified the type of structure,rim elevation,pipe invert elevation,pipe materials,direction,size,and co ndition.Sectional/Gra nt Survey and Subdivision locations,W ork Zone Safety,as well as Project N etw ork Control Sheets were pro vided. MIAMI BEACH MARK SOWERS,PSM SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING SPECIALIST DESIGN-BUILD CRITERIA PACKAGE FOR THE DADELAND SOUTH INTERMODAL STATION PROJECT I AECOM I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/SUE DIRECTOR I MGY was responsible for the establishment of horizontal (NAD 83/90)and vertical control (NAVD 88)networks.The survey baseline and right of way were established along the South-Dade Transitway and all intersecting side streets.To pographic and DTM Survey was performed from right of way to right of way along the project limits and all intersecting side-streets.Check cross sections were performed.A drainage survey was performed within the project limits,and identified the type ot structure,rim elevation,pipe invert elevation,pipe materials,direction,size,and condition. Th e survey co nsisting of field locations of section corners,one- fourth-section co rners,and fractional co rners as well as block closures,monument lines,etc.,was performed to establish the right of way lines along all intersecting side-streets.W ork zone safety was provided,and PNC sheets were prepared.A bridge survey was also performed on the Northbound entrance to SR 826 over the existing transit corridor and the Metrorail bridges over Doiron Drive.MGY also provided Utility Designates (Horizontal M apping)thro ughout the project limits.Utility scans were performed within a 5'radius of each proposed boring loca tion,including one exploratory test hole completed at the approximate boring location as well as one test hole on each utility detected within 5'radius.A total of 20 test holes were performed in the following boring locations:Bor ings for bridge 6 (B-1 to B-6),Borings for walls 2 (W B-1 and W B-2),and Percolation Tests 2(P-1 and P-2) CONTINUING SERVICES FOR SURVEY,MAPPING,AND SUE I DISTRICTWIDE, FL I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 4 I SENIOR SURVEYOR AND MAPPER/SUE DIRECTOR I Tas k driven co ntract perfo rming miscellaneous Survey and Mapping services in Browar d,Indian River,Mar tin,Palm Beach,and St.Lucie Counties,and all municipalities within the district.Services include,but are not limited to:Field Surveys,Historical Baseline and Existing Right of W ay Determination,Global Positioning System (GPS)Surveys,Monumentation Surveys,Bathymetric Surveys (which includes single beam,multi beam and side sca nner sonar ca pabilities),Utility Designation and Excavation (including Underwater Utilities),Tree Surveys {trees identified by an Arborist or Landscape Architect),Right of Way Control Survey M aps,Right of W ay Maps,Maintenance Maps,Right of W ay M onumentation M aps,Boundar y Surveys,Quality Assurance Reviews,Expert W itness Testimony,Title Sear ch Plotting Maps,Title Document Review and Analysis,Sketches, Parcel Staking,and Legal Descriptions. oooar EIIEEE0 $EI;71JS2LIA\VISWU IJI IEE 30 !1I n 10 $4 20 24 -234-34 D9 beengineeInc FIRM M iller,Legg & Associates,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 30 EDUCATION M BA,N ova Southeastern University, 1998 BS in Biology and Business Adm inistration, University of W isconsin, Stevens Point,1994 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Senior Professional W etlands Scientist,2020 Certified Enviro nmental Pro fessional,1994 A uthorized Gopher To rtoise Agent,2012 DYLAN LARSON,SPWS,CEP EN V IRO N M ENTAL ENGIN EERING SPECIALIST M r.Lar son has deca des of South Florida experience in enviro nmental consulting and is responsible fo r directing studies and investigations on biological and eco logica l aspects of the firm's projects. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SEAWALL REPLACEMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FOR 48TH STREET ANO N.BAY ROAD ANO FLAMINGO DRIVE AT 29TH STREET I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH.FL I PRINCIPAL I Miller Legg performed a benthic natural resource survey along and adjacent to two existing seawalls for 48th Street at N.Bay Road and Flamingo Drive at 29th Street in Miami Beach to document corals,seagrasses and any other natural resources located within the area.Th is information will be used to develop avoidance and minimization measures associated with seaw all re placement and project design and applica tion for DERM Class I Coastal Resources Permit with a Special Conditions including a Cora l Relocation Plan,and any other necessary environmental permits if impacts are unavoidable.The project loca tion also falls within the N ational M ar ine Fisheries Service (N M FS)critica l habitat for the Johnson's sea grass,therefore,there is potential fo r this species to be present within the survey area. E.G.SEWELL PARK I CITY OF MIAMI I MIAMI.FL I PRINCIPAL I Miller Legg is under co ntract with the City of M iami for progra m development,pre-design,master planning design including public involvement w orkshops,co nstruction documents and construction administration services for Sewell Park,a 10.33- acr e park on the Miami River.Th e program will be an open passive park with elements including passive walkw ays through par k and preserve areas,pavilions,an eco trail,baywalk,hardsca pe, floating docks,kayak launch,seaw all/living shoreline,wayfinding and historical information signage. Th e scope of services includes landscape architecture,irrigation,civil engineering,topographical surveying,SUE,certified ar borist,structural engineering,electrica l engineering,geotechnica l engineering,archeological,permitting,bidding assistance and limited co nstruction administration. M iller Legg has performed a bathymetric survey for the seawall component.The civil sco pe entails gra ding,drainage and utilities work.Th e firm will also conduct a Bonneted Bat survey.The firm is assisting the City to gather community stakeholder input during the design process.Government agency permitting will be coordinated with M iami-Dade County DERM ,WASD and SFW M D. WEST LAKE PARK PHASE 4 I BROWARD COUNTY PARKS ANO RECREATION DEPARTMENT I DANIA BEACH.FL I PRINCIPAL I M iller Legg was again selected to pro vide both environmental and engineering services for this 1,500- acre Brow ar d County and State-owned tidal estuarine park in Hollywood,this time for the fourth (4th) segment.Th e scope of services includes mitigation design and dredge and fill permitting through US Army Corps of Engineers (USACO E)and Florida Fish and W ildlife Conservation Commission (FW CC )to encoura ge natural/pioneer mangro ve pro pagation,preservation of existing mangroves, negotiation of permit modifications through Browar d County Environmental Protection Department (BC EPD),South Florida W ater M anagement District (SFW M D)and USACOE services.Specific tas ks being provided for this segment ar e the following:W etland Determination,Seagrass Surveys, Environmental Resource Permitting (USACO E,SFW M D),Restoration Design,Civil Engineering, Surveying,Soil Disposal Coordination and Administration and Planting (over 63,000 plants)Review &Rip Rap &M ar ine W etland Protection Design.Miller Legg will provide compliance monitoring services for a five-year period after construction co mpletion. M IA M I BEACH «no6or EIIIEEIIIJ 5JI,J 7#;III13 .I)LI)I0 LIE; 30!1Hr»ny 3924 234-34 WEST LAKE PARK PHASE II -ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I BROWARD COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I DANIA BEACH,FL I PRINCIPAL I Miller Legg has been working with Broward County on numerous phases of restoration at West Lake Park over the past 20 years West Lake Park is a±1500-acre estuarine park that sits along 3 miles of the lntracoastal Waterway {ICWW). The firm has provided both environmental and engineering services for necessary mitigation for the Port Everglades and Ft.Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport expansion projects.One of the largest portions of the project at the Park was the design,permitting (including dredge and fill), construction oversight,and monitoring of mangrove,seagrass, maritime hammock,and mud flat restoration within the Park. Baseline studies were performed,including water quality and hydrologic monitoring,benthic assessments,and seagrass and bathymetric surveys.Then a mitigation plan was developed along with a detailed management plan The mitigation plan was then permitted through the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, South Florida Water Management District,and Broward County. SL-15 MITIGATION AREA AND SR 732/JENSEN BEACH CAUSEWAY IMPROVEMENTS I FOOT DISTRICT 4 I ST.LUCIE COUNTY I SENIOR SCIENTIST I Miller Legg was responsible for the identification and survey of proposed seagrass creation area consisting of a ten- acre island within Indian River Lagoon on Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)land under a Florida Inland Navigational District easement.Miller Legg coordinated restoration efforts through multiple agencies including FDEP, South Florida Water Management District and the US Army Corps of Engineers.This included field evaluation,ranking and prioritization of suitable areas to mitigate.Field evaluations were done to classify the island vegetation and use as well as a seagrass survey in the island vicinity.Services provided included:jurisdictional determination,mitigation design, permitting,Essential Fish Habitat Assessment,construction plan development,public involvement and agency coordination. MIAMI BEACH DYLAN LARSON,SPS,CEP ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SPECIALIST RIVER PARK MARINA I PORT ST.LUCIE I ST.LUCIE COUNTY I CHIEF SCIENTIST I For this St.Lucie County River Park Marina located in Port St.Lucie,Miller Legg provided mitigation monitoring services at the preserve area along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River for a period of five years Mitigation monitoring is a permitting requirement of the FDEP and USACE and includes specific task requirements such as quarterly monitoring reports for one year and semi-annually for years two to five.In addition to the monitoring,our biologists provided vegetation clearing oversight for removal of exotics.The project also included 0.32 acres of shoreline rip rap protection,fishing platform,and fixed and floating dock components.Approximately five acres of mixed hardwood wetlands were placed under a conservation easement and the shoreline was planted with native vegetation such as mangroves and leather fern.Nuisance and exotic species were also removed as part of the project improvements. PORT EVERGLADES TURNING NOTCH I BROWARD COUNTY I FORT LAUDERDALE,FL I PRINCIPAL I Miller Legg is a subconsultant to Bergeron Land Development for this two-step Port Everglades Turning Notch Mangrove Wetland Creation Project.The overall goal of the project is to lengthen the existing deepwater turn-around area for cargo ships from 900 feet to 2,400 feet to allow for up to five new cargo berths.A critical part of the Southport Turning Notch Extension included replacing 8.7 acres of an existing mangrove conservation easement with creation of a l6.5-acre mangrove habitat with approximately 70,000 new mangroves and transitional plants from an existing upland.During this wetlands restoration construction, the firm provided field support services tor environmental and engineering permit compliance,protected species observation, including mangroves and manatees,water quality monitoring, turbidity monitoring,erosion control inspection,plan review, environmental administration and reporting,and mangrove and upland planting oversight.Miller Legg was also responsible for reviewing post-construction compliance monitoring for a 5-year period.This was an enabling project for the $437 million Port Everglades Southport Turning Notch Expansion project. «r»sos ±IIE-IJ3EI'JI,Z83 JI'III18 I)LIIV I 1IE3 39!Inf!no)2924-234-3)) FIRM Miller,Legg & Associates,Inc. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE I6 EDUCATION BS in Ecology,Minor in Geography,Florida Atlantic University,2008 REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Wetlands Scientist,2021 Certified Arborist,2014 WILLIAM MOHLER,PWS,CA,TRAD,CLI ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SPECIALIST Mr.Mohler has significant experience in environmental consulting including environmental document preparation,ecological monitoring and assessment,compliance monitoring,and geographic information systems (GIS). RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SEAWALL REPLACEMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FOR 48TH STREET AND N.BAY ROAD AND FLAMINGO DRIVE AT 29TH STREET I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SCIENTIST I Miller Legg performed a benthic natural resource survey along and adjacent lo two existing seawalls for 48th Street al N.Bay Road and Flamingo Drive al 29th Street in Miami Beach to document corals,seagrasses and any other natural resources located within the area.This information will be used lo develop avoidance and minimization measures associated with seawall replacement and project design and application for DERM Class I Coastal Resources Permit with a Special Conditions including a Coral Relocation Plan,and any other necessary environmental permits if impacts are unavoidable.The project location also falls within the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)critical habitat for the Johnson's seagrass,therefore, there is potential for this species to be present within the survey area.Miller Legg is a subconsultant lo BCC Engineering under their Professional Architectural and Engineering Services in Specialized Categories "As Needed"Contract SEAWALL 48TH STREET CORAL RELOCATION I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I SENIOR SCIENTIST I Miller Legg is temporarily relocating corals during N Bay Road and 48th Street End Seawall project.Once construction is complete,and the turbidity curtains are removed,the biologists will survey the new riprap to determine a location that will afford the coral the best chance for stability and long-term survival.The coral will be placed within the riprap so that its orientation and depth are comparable with its original position.A post relocation report will be completed,including a site plan that identifies the relocated coral,pre-and post-locations of the coral,and the anticipated survivability.In addition, Miller Legg will prepare a one week,one month and six months post relocation coral monitoring reports. E.G.SEWELL PARK I CITY OF MIAMI I MIAMI,FL I SENIOR SCIENTIST I Miller Legg is under contract with the City of Miami for program development,pre-design,master planning design including public involvement workshops,construction documents and construction administration services for Sewell Park,a l 0.33- acre park on the Miami River.The program will be an open passive park with elements including passive walkways through park and preserve areas,pavilions,an ecotrail,baywalk,hardscape, floating docks,kayak launch,seawall/living shoreline,wayfinding and historical information signage. The scope of services includes landscape architecture,irrigation,civil engineering,topographical surveying,SUE,certified arborist,structural engineering,electrical engineering,geotechnical engineering,archeological,permitting,bidding assistance and limited construction administration. Miller Legg has performed a bathymetric survey for the seawall component.The civil scope entails grading,drainage and utilities work.The firm will also conduct a Bonneted Bat survey.The firm is assisting the City to gather community stakeholder input during the design process.Government agency permitting will be coordinated with Miami-Dade County DERM,WASD and SFWMD. MIAMI BEACH «w oo +±III)I EEE-III)±IV3 HJ1III8 JI)III)EL IE 50!I+fyn»394-234-3) be WEST LAKE PARK PHASE 4 I BROWARD COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I DANIA BEACH,FL I SENIOR SCIENTIST I Miller Legg was again select ed to provide both enviro nmental and engineering services fo r this 1,500-acre Bro w ar d County and State-owned tidal estuar ine par k in Hollyw ood,this time for the fourth (4th) segm ent.Th e scope of services includes mitigation design and dredge and fill permitting thro ugh US Army Corps of Engineers (USACO E)and Florida Fish and W ildlife Conservation Com mission (FW C C }to enco ura ge natural/pioneer mangro ve propagation,preservation of existing mangroves, negotiation of permit modifications thro ugh Brow ard County Environm ental Pro tect ion Department (BC EPD),South Florida W ater M anagem ent District (SFW M D)and USACO E services. Specific tasks being provided for this segment are the follow ing: W etland Determination,Seagra ss Surveys,Environmental Resource Perm itting (USACO E,SFW M D),Restor ation Design, Civil Engineering,Surveying,Soil Disposal Coordination and Administra tion and Planting (over 63,000 plants)Review & Rip Rap &M ar ine W etland Protect ion Design.Miller Legg will pro vide com pliance monitoring services fo r a five-year period after construction completion. WEST LAKE PARK PHASE II -ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I BROWARD COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I DANIA BEACH,FL I SENIOR SCIENTIST I M iller Legg has been w orking with Brow ar d County on num erous phases of restoration at W est Lake Par k over the past 20 year s.W est Lake Par k is a ±1500-acre estuarine par k that sits along 3 miles of the lntra co astal W aterw ay (ICW W ). The firm has provided both enviro nmental and engineering services for necessar y mitigation for the Port Everglades and Ft.Lauderdale-H ollyw ood International Airport expansion pro ject s.O ne of the lar gest portions of the project at the Par k w as the design,permitting (including dredge and fll), construction oversight,and monitoring of mangrove,seagrass, mar itim e hammock,and mud flat restoration within the Park. Baseline studies w ere performed,including water quality and hydrologic monitoring,benthic assessments,and seagra ss and bathym etric surveys.Then a mitigation plan was developed along w ith a detailed management plan.The mitigation plan w as then perm itted through the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, South Florida W ater M anagement District,and Broward County. M IA M I BEA C H WILLIAM MOHLER,PWS,CA,TRAO,CU EN V IRO N M EN TA L EN G IN EERIN G SPEC IA LIST PORT EVERGLADES TURNING NOTCH I FORT LAUDERDALE,FL I BROWARD COUNTY I SENIOR SCIENTIST I M iller Legg is a subconsultant to Bergeron Land Development for this two-step Port Everglades Turning Notch Mangrove W etland Creation Project.The overall goal of the pro ject is to lengthen the existing deepwater turn-aro und area for car go ships from 900 feet to 2,400 feet to allow for up to five new car go berths.A critica l part of the Southport Turning Notch Extension included replacing 8.7 acres of an existing mangrove conservation easement with creation of a 16.5-acre mangro ve habitat with approximately 70,000 new mangroves and transitional plants from an existing upland.During this wetlands restoration co nstruction, the firm provided field support services for environmental and engineering permit compliance,protected species observation, including mangroves and manatees,water quality monitoring, turbidity monitoring,erosion control inspection,plan review, environmental administration and reporting,and mangrove and upland planting oversight.M iller Legg was also responsible for reviewing post-construction compliance monitoring for a 5-year period.Th is was an enabling project for the $437 million Port Everglades Southport Turning Notch Expansion project. DEERFIELD ISLAND BOARDWALK MANGROVE ASSESSMENT I BROWARD COUNTY I DEERFIELD BEACH,FL I SCIENTIST I Browar d County Parks and Recreation Division planned to replace the existing old boardwalk on Deerfield Island located at the lntraco astal W aterway and the Hillsboro Canal in the City of Deerfield Beach.Due to the dense growth of mangroves present along the boar dwalk area and through the mangrove wetland, Miller Legg was retained to pro vide an assessment of the extent of removal of mangrove trees and type of mangrove structure (branches,twigs,limbs,foliage,roots)removal required to provide clear ance for work access to remove the old boar dwalk structure and replace with the new structure, and to provide pedestrian access.Services provided included mangrove trimming recommendations,certified arborist review, compliance with South Florida Water Management District (SFW MD)permitting. «woos EI)III:EII9 SE)IES HJ SIAIIIJ MI)LJ)II)LE3 »±Pf!n1»94-234-3)9 be FIRM Media Relations Group, LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 19 EDUCATION Associates of Art, International Fine Arts College,Miami,FL, 2003 Bachelor of Fine Arts, Interior Design,Art Institute of Fort Lauderdale,FL,2005 DAYANA SANJURJO PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SPECIALIST Dayana Sanjurjo is a public information and communications professional with more than l9 years of professional experience on multiple complex campaigns,contracts and initiatives on numerous Planning,Project Development and Environment (PD&E),Design-Build,and Construction projects for the Miami-Dade DTPW,Miami-Dade WASD,the City of Miami Beach and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).Being fully bilingual,she is highly skilled in stakeholder research, communicating to the public in English and Spanish,and planning and participating in community outreach activities. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE 1 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PUBLIC INFORMATION LIAISON I Mrs. Sanjurjo leads Pl efforts for this Design/Build construction project of various improvements along l Street from Alton Road to Washington Avenue.She coordinates and staff's multiple meetings with SOFNA members and other major key stakeholders from the South of Fifth area.She continues to do door to door distributions,stakeholder coordination,meeting summaries and maintains a stakeholder database specific to this project. ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CAMIJ WATER METER UPGRADES PROJECT I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH, FL I PUBLIC INFORMATION LIAISON I Media Relations Group (MRG)was contracted by the City to assist with the communicational campaign aspect and community outreach to prepare and inform stakeholders about the ongoing upgrade of the water meters to the AMI (Advanced Metering Infrastructure) technology.Responsibilities include developing public involvement plans in close coordination with the City's Neighborhood Affairs Division staff,developing project-related informational materials, collateral production and communicating project information and addressing citizen/stakeholder concerns. PUBLIC INFORMATION OUTREACH SERVICES FOR RIGHT OF WAY AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I PUBLIC INFORMATION LIAISON I Mrs.Sanjurjo is responsible for developing public involvement plans in close coordination with the City's Neighborhood Affairs Division staff,developing project-related informational materials,bilingual collateral production and communicating project information and addressing citizen/stakeholder concerns,among other tasks. BROAD CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PDEE STUDY I ATKINS-REALIS I TOWN OF BAY HARBOR ISLANDS,FL I COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I Mrs.Sanjurjo is the Community Outreach Specialist for this project. She currently assists the Public Information Manager with all aspects of public involvement as part of this study. VILLAGE OF MIAMI SHORES BAYFRONT PARK ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES I CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I Mrs.Sanjurjo is the lead Community Outreach Specialist on this contract,responsible for all public outreach efforts and project related collateral dissemination. TOWN OF MEDLEY [MULTIPLE PROJECTS)I TOWN OF MEDLEY I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I PUBLIC INFORMATION LIAISON I Mrs.Sanjurjo attended stakeholder and client meetings,conducted site visits and door-to-door distributions of project information,she also attended progress meetings as part of the outreach efforts for these construction projects. MIAMI BEACH ossoar ±IIIEERIIIJ $:JI3 1JI;III3AIU LI EE1JES J9!II!rI0»2924-234-3)D)en%I,, be FIRM Media Relations Group, LLC YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 10 EDUCATION BS in Public Relations, Advertising and Applied Communication,Florida International University, 2021 ISELA CARMIOL PUBLIC RELATIONS SPECIALIST Isela Carmiol has over ten years of professional experience specializing in communications management,administration,and professional language education.As an English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL)tutor at Miami-Dade College in Homestead,she provided tutoring to ESOL learners through conversation practice and one-on-one tutoring as well as taught a basic computer and technological skills to adult students.She also trained Company Executives in developing English language skills and created and implemented daily lesson plans and assignments to effectively stimulate language learning while working as an English Instructor in San Jose,Costa Rica. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE FOOT SUNGUIOE TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CENTER (TMC)I AECOM I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I ASST.PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER I Ms.Carmiol assists MRG's ITS Community Outreach Specialist,who worked alongside FDOT ITS Management Staff,to disseminate material via industry publications and interact directly with the public as the customer service and online outreach coordinator. ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE !AMIJ WATER METER UPGRADES PROJECT I CITY OF MIAMI BEACH I MIAMI BEACH,FL I ASST.COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I Ms.Carmiol assists all of MRG's Senior Community Outreach Specialists with conducting door to door distributions and staffing Spanish speaking community events. BROAD CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PDGE STUY I ATKINS·REALIS I TOWN OF BAY HARBOR ISLANDS,FL I COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I Ms.Carmiol currently assists the Lead Community Outreach Specialist and the Public Information Manager with all aspects of public involvement as part of this study. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY VISION ZERO INITIATIVE I BCC ENGINEERING/CONSOR I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I The Miami-Dade DTPW has committed to eliminating traffic deaths and serious injuries within their transportation network by 2040 through their Vision Zero Program.MRG is leading the public engagement efforts for this life saving initiative and continues to engage numerous communities to expand awareness.Ms.Carmiol assists the Public Involvement manager and conducts outreach by neighborhood and one on one surveying as well as attending municipal events. FOOT DISTRICT SIX I·195/SR 112 FROM NW 12TH AVENUE TO SR 907/ALTON ROAD PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL (PGE)STUDY I METRIC ENGINEERING I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY.FL I COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I Ms.Carmiol assists the Lead Community Outreach Specialist in coordinating public involvement efforts as part of this study.Activities include disseminating trilingual fliers for a kick-off meeting, conducting door to door distributions,venue vetting and selection,as well as performing calls to key stakeholders.She is currently assisting in planning for an Alternatives Public meeting scheduled for early-2024. VILLAGE OF MIAMI SHORES BAYFRONT PARK ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES I CHEN MOORE AND ASSOCIATES I MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FL I COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST I Ms.Carmiol assists the lead Community Outreach Specialist with the development of project related materials and collaterals for dissemination to the public. MIAMI BEACH 0 MIAMI BEACH 3IIEE0:II8 3I SI!ILL5IJLI0EI±Is 4933 3J30: !be TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONTJ I LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS e-~-~ STATE OF FLORIDA AB BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS nwortssiorutcan «a«kl«[s o uor e PROVISIONSOFCHAPTER A71,FLORIASTATUTES ",3 e <H ERRERA,VICT OR H. !~. Gr-~ STATE OF FLORIDA At BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS rt Portsssos«t vcair res so uo«Tt PROVISIONSOF CHAPTER 471,FLORIDA STATUTES cut scrow uMetre no [a,,3j A QU INO,CHRIST ANi ---- STATE OF FLORIDA At .":-.PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER A71,FLORBA STATUTES dlet?i var.owner.i> &--~MW¥STATE OF FLORIDA A BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSItSr,TH PROFESSIONALENGINEER HREN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER A471.FLORIDASTATUTES 5];1 AJUNKIN,WILLIAM EMILEv.e s oc occ. EXPIRATION DATE:FE8RUA Y 28,2025 ,,7¢.« Gerion.+aa,1 PARATHON DATE.FEBRUARY 24,2025 h as et res lee at bfrid.a,nettom '2 ExPRATION DATE FEBRUARY 28,2025 hoes eerhy lees,nlee at Midi.at,iretr atasrs1 xPIRA TON DATE-FEBRUARY 28,2025 n os eerily rees,nine tt Myriot.ittoe Do ot alter his,gentinany horn f ir lose.ti nletl or aye ther than the lee to this,ireno po not a.er this den t in any horn Thi yr lien..mi nlawful he atone-other than theeosee to one phis do meno t. Do not alter this,torren t inmo hone Th ir lone.min.bu tut toe pyre tr tho theknee to u this,d rent Victor H.Herrera I PE71164 Christian Aquino I PE74647 Daniel Raymat I PE631ll William "Bill"Junkin I PE43707 e -•-~=-- STATE OF FLORIDA AB ~----le STATE OF FLORIDA MN ----- STATE OF FLORIDA A ~~----bi8 STATE OF FLORIDA Ar BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS rt Portssiort van rr s cosro uNon PROVISIONS Or CHAPTER 471,FLORIASTATUTES 8. l FORAND,ROBERTEDWARD JR. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS rorssoucar rsscspo owoc rt PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER A71,FLORIDA STATUTES '.... l sALzNo.coRY To»As4. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS rt rores.srootwee rrses«o urots m PROVISIONSOF CO-APTER 471.FLORIASTATUTES .':) -«£ PIC K,RICHAR D JACOBs BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS r«rorsoon«aal aco oon« PROVIONS OF CHAPTER471.FLORIDASTATUTES3 'CHEN,CHUAN5 .> (asirs so.rs.s XPARA TION DATE.FERUAY 28,2025 haps ony #arosenee at hfirid.atitwee ¢,-e...g PIRA TION DATE:FEBRUARY 28,2025 h a enitlrnoes,lee 9 M#fill,keten 22.z 2,oosro«a.rsss] EXPIRATION DATE.FEBRUARY 28,2025 #he.rsritlee neeatrid.atiereto PARA1ION DATE.FEBRUARY 28,2025 kw.er hy heroes lone at Myflorid.at.i rtten Do not hter this doureno t ino any form This,i»or krone librettul for yore other than the ire«e to use tis dotonenot. Do not alterthis do uren t in any form ts hr lone.linolehl for anyone other than the line to gsthis dot urent Donot alter this document in any torn Thi s is your ere.ht is unlonwetu l tot any one other than the foresee to owe this doorer t. Do not alter ths douareno t in any form Thisi your kaenose ,ti unlawful tor anyone other than the keenerto re this do orrert. Bob Forand I PE58611 Cory Salzano I PE75451 Richard Pick I PE84339 Chuan Chen I PE93871 MIAMI BEACH 0 MIAMI BEACH 3III:±II Is8,3LS±I!III8 .LIL LII0SIIELIES f bc33.V TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONT)I LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS --··-- STAIE OF FLORIA A e-·--~ STATE OF FLORIDA A --·-·- STATE OF FLORIDA A ~~.~~'STATE OF FLORIDA MA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS t »Ht WROESONIPANEKHt$UNMok It FOVONs or Hauf471,HOR strums GOSSELIN,MARK STEVEN• 4UCNS(NUMtt4594 XRAIONOAT£.F6RUAY 2a,202$ l o wryig ere tr t Mt rod.ti«rt BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS Ht ++s#At fut r#+stst t ut k + +ovsON$o»cu 471.00M$11Un5 .,:S.TRUDNAK,MICHAEL EDWARD ,»> r5 Gass soi +sca EXIRATON DATE:HHBRuAY 2,202 OARD or PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS Ht PRon tsstout vc.a w or{gosto uwok rt PROVO$orCOwTK 471.+UQSTUTES '.i:.KRECIC.MICHAELR.?I r r ,p#.- Geniaso666 PARATMON DATE.FEBRUARY284 2025 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS orssso.oak naalo co owoo n« PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER A71,FLORIDA STATUTES>,»; t +;].A MO NTENEGRO,ALEJANDRO R.±°M s z%-Lssiro ws rsrs» EPIRATONDATE:.FEBRUARY28.2025 noonerr hereoelee at Medo.reten Tsii ore one.tt is onioned le aeon other tan e enc to e the do.rent Donot alter this,iotarent inany fer This your kere.ti uniontut tor yore other than the kenet to one this do rent Mark Gosselin I PE54594 Mike Trudnak I PE58200 Michael Krecic I PE Alejandro Montenegro I PE59426 c----STATE OF FLORIDA MA 6e load.heath oot«de ore al toe etorloandtaro«ions ea o lipt::7z2-•.sass 8 :.:".7-«ant#loot ortoot±a8iotaiipofat.ea bro±Mao t+«nw.L$2» lo»eratoe,Lode lloay 2 Mp e tiara lipread ta hrr ad rherotoilteerokra ioard a lroroat arrors atape jg,alau Mo Piao Tadta.an,Frida $2)99.ai Lese No LS9 pato Mute February #.202 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS t ores«owtwca rrls oso woos m PROV5IONS OF CHAPTTR 471,FLORIASTATUTES # LLANOS,GUSTAVO A Professional Surveyor and Mapper License i.titler pooooomsfthemeat«ti#hara r4kk 4 »4»isw;fr4r«,«,kt n to.#4po na al not «hat p i trot po»ti«of 4rat1ti' Professional Surveyor and Mapper License taint porous #papal ±au9tr Mt#I t6 #AMk ps war srti,+up =5 autos,rst«or#grad 4aura4» Professional Surveyor and Mapper License ndr he prewons ofhoper 472 FurlStates 9%"°MAMt,+.17140 >5 wILION 4/Mrs0A0Mrsswotow ootu t«.Mt.u [usroo ro» P BA TION DATE.FEBRUARY 28,202$ hata th#foil,ret Mark Sowers I LS5266 Manuel G.Vera Jr.I LS5291 Carlos Alonso I LS6669 Donoter this,douet i any ton Ts,i heme linbnw fol tor anyone her thane the lee to gs this,dunen t Gus Llanos I PE73518 MIAMI BEACH 0 MIAMI BEACH I:II0 $IE3,3IL±III MILIII)IE±ILE3TFS)9 3033-933 y H, TAB 2 EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM CONT) 2.2 Q U A LIFIC A TIO N S O F TH E BID D ER TEA M The following table outlines our subconsultant Team's experience. PEE4LELLE EETT.ANEW I3II'IIIII vey along and adjac N.Bay Road and Flamingo Drive at 29 Street in Miami Beach to document corals,seagrasses and any other natural resources located within the area.This information was used to develop avoidance and minimization measures associated .-..-u ~::1 I with seawall replacement and project design and application for DERM Class I Permit including Stony Corals for relocation permit plans,obtain environmental permits and approvals via general permits and exemptions from USACOE JAXBO and ··'l Seawall Replacement at SFWMD 1ii",_48"ST and 29 ST GCES performed geotechnical exploration for the design of the seawall replacements.The work included Standard Miami Beach,FL Penetration Test (SPT)borings lo provide design and construction recommendations. MGV performed surveying services,which included establishing Horizontal and Vertical control on the Florida State I Plone Coordinate System,East Zone,and North American Datum (NAD)of 1983/2011 Adjustment,as well os an NAV88 vertical datum.The topographic survey located all above-ground features and improvements within the survey limits,including fences,walls,_buildings,appurtenances,visible above-ground utilities,drainage structures,seawalls,top I of seawalls,and canal soundings ent to two existina seawalls tor 48th Street a Various Seawall Replacements Miami Beach,FL GCES performed geotechnical exploration for the design of the seawall replacements. MGV was responsible for designating (horizontally mark on the surface)known existing toneable and non-loneable I subsurface utilities found within 6 "Scan"areas depicted on the plans provided by the client utilizing electromagnetic geophysical prospecting equipment,including ground penetrating radar (GPR).MGV also performed up to 215 utility locates (test holes)on potential utility conflicts as identified on the plans provided by the client. Beach View Park 4 a Soundscape New World Symphony Campus MGV performed surveying services at Beach Park View,which included a Boundary Survey,the Placement of Monuments I at all major corners of the property's boundary,the establishment of Right-of-Way lines in accordance with Right of Way Maps,the Surveying of Platted and/or dedicated Right-of-Ways where applicable,the identification of Flood Zone Designations,a Topographic Survey,Elevation measurements,the establishment of the Coastal Construction Control Line, and the establishment of Benchmarks MGV was responsible for providing Design Survey services.The scope of work included establishing horizontal and Vertical Control,performing Cross Sections on a 50 h grid,and conducting Topographic Survey /DIM 3D-Modeling.This involved locating all above-ground features and improvements,break-lines,high and low points,as well as topographic features such as existing lighting,pavement markings,trees,pedestrian ramps,driveways,visible above -ground utilities, sodded and paved areas,and drainage structures {including rim/gutter elevations),etc wee Giancarlo Pena,PE 2021 -ca City of 305-673-7490 OngoingMiamiBeachGpena@miamibeachfl.gov .MG.VERA \~-~11.ASS OCIATES,IIIC. @ ._Giancarlo Pera,PE 2020- 305-673-7490 Ongoing,MG.VERA Miami 8eoch Gpena@miamibeachfl.gov ,~&ASSOCIATES,Inc\. Giancarlo Peno,PE 2021-_MG VERA City of Miami I 305-673-7490 2022BeachGpena@miamibeachfl.govJass50CITES IT Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE,MG.VE I sec 305-670-2350 20228ASSOCIATESEngineeringCaquino@bcceng.com e:·- Phased Design Build (DB)SR AIA Emergency Seawall Project Flagler and Volusia Counties,FL 6 1-275 at Sunshine Skyway Seawall Phase II -Wove Attenuation Device DB" Manatee County,FL The FDOT is installing two seawalls along SR Al A to protect the roadway from Atlantic Ocean hurricane surges and waves.One segment extends from the S Central Avenue in Flagler County to one-half mile north of High Bridge Road in Volusia County (approximately 7,000 feel [ft]).The other segment extends approx.2,300 ft from Marlin Drive to Sunset Drive in Volusia County.INTERA is supporting the design build team in the coastal engineering aspects of the project including assessing historical beach profiles and shoreline changes,simulating shoreline responses to 50-year storms (with sea level rise)utilizing USACE's cross-shore erosion model (SBEACH),and estimating local scour. The design build project includes design,permitting,and construction of two breakwaters located approximately 200 feet offshore the south Skyway fishing pier access road.INTERA assessed the stability of the devices under extreme conditions,resistance to settling and shifting,attenuation of wave energy at the existing seawall under different surge events,and scour at the breakwater ends.l INTERA INTERA FDOT D5 FDOT DI Catalina Chacon 386-943-5039 Catalina.Chacon@dot.state.fl.us / Brent Setchell 863-519-2557 Brent.Setchell@dot.state.fl.us 2023 - Ongoing I 2022 -2023 "BCC Engineering job.MIAMI BEACH 0 MIAMI BEACH 3III:III9LI33 3JR)3IE1LL,AJLJILI8 IE LILES 333 y bc3 TAB 2 EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM [CONTJ 2.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE BIDDER TEAM The following table outlines our subconsultant Team's experience. 2.2.1 0QUALIFICATIONS OF BIDDER TEAM no»crawtam i.be%%g@gij%#gig@e fa@jjg2is±gift±ish;sreno ff3d....1not NY'oorcomer .uus._ w Witlllll it±t ie;<.sf&e;g j.±ski:kg#s&&,f '&.3let:is.'sis.lhiiaiilk.at •tz±±$±±i c e±.f.llti tl i i sill MME [i.hoistittitell[ENGAGEMENT Ee-Hess and Bridae eowalls DB p,,«llas and Miller Legg is under contract with the City of Miami for program development,pre-design,master planning design including public involvement workshops,construction documents and construction administration services for Sewell Park, a 10.33-acre park on the Miami River The program will be an open passive park with elements including passive walkways through park and preserve areas,pavilions,an eco trail,baywalk,hardscape,floating docks,kayak launch, I seawall/living s~oreline,wayfinding and historiccd informa~i~n signage.~iller L~gg has ~erforrned w_~t~and delineati~ns and a bathymetric survey for the seawall component.The civil scope entails grading,drainage and utilities work The firm has also conducted a Bonneted Bat survey.The firm is assisting the City to gather community stakeholder input during the design process.Government agency permitting will be coordinated with Miami-Dade County DERM,WASD and SFWMD. Las'ea wueoea City of Miami Marisol Martinez 305-416-1219 Mmartinez@miamigov.com Ongoing Liz Winters FDOT D7/813-849-7509 Elizabeth.winters@dot.state.fl.us 2020- 2025 (Et.) I A5 part of the northbound bridge replacement of the Howard Frankland Bridge,Miller Legg provided landscape architecture support for the largest bridge replacement project in Florida.Specific services tor this project included providing a Landscape Opportunity Plan,outlining potential areas for the landscape to have impacts and to make sure there were no conflicts with other utilities.Miller Legg provided these landscape architectural services as a subconsultant to the Archer Western/Traylor Bros./BCC Engineering team. INTERA supported the BCC design build Team by providing a Bridge Hydraulics Report,and scour calculation services. This service included the identification ot erosion and deposition areas.Calculations involved the application of CMS I Flow driven by results from the ADC I RC modeling.Calculation of long term scour and local scour al the proposed bridge piers employed methodologies outlined in the FDOT Scour Manual and HEC-18.They also developed 2-year hydraulic design conditions for temporary structures. INTERA Advanced Meterin I MRG was contracted by the ~ity to assist with the communication campaign and community ~utreach to prepare and inform 1 f (AMI~W stakeholders about the ongo,ng upgrade of the waler meter;to the AMI (Advanced Metering lnfroslructure)technology. ;rast~ctured ater Responsibilities include developing public involvement plans in close coordination with the City's Neighborhood Affairs ~te~8 pg~a F~s Division staff,developing project-related informational materials,producing collateral,communicating proiect information, Miami each,l and addressing citizen/stakeholder concerns. RelE7 al Desia Dade Co (SR)5/US 1/Overseas Highway/Old7 Mile Bridge Rehabilitation Project" The project consists of the design,permitting,and construction of improvements at Miami Shores Village (Village)Bayfront Park.MRG is a subconsultant of CMA,providing public involvement services such as producing project fact sheets, managing stakeholder databases,preparing a Community Awareness Plan [CAP),coordinating public meetings,and managing stakeholder inquiry requests. MRG led all Pl efforts in preparation for the FDOT District Six Old Seven Mile Bridge Ribbon Cutting Ceremony,which included a Ribbon Cutting Ceremony Plan,media kits,press releases,multiple and inter-agency coordination effort, among other items.This project consisted of repairing the bridge to restore connectivity between Knights Key and Pigeon Key,while creating a recreational area with sate bicycle and pedestrian conditions.Since its reopening,the bridge has attracted thousands of residents and transients which brings enormous historical and economic value to the community. MRG's collaborative efforts with Monroe County,City of Marathon,the Department of Environmental Protection,the Pigeon Key foundation,Friends of Old Seven,the Monroe Tourist Development Authority,the Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce and many others led to a successful event in January 2022 0@ 0@ @@ I City of Miami I Kevin Pulido Beach 305-673-7575 2112Public··· I f ..Kevmpul1do@m1am1beachfl.gov jnormation Serv;ce;I Patrick Kaimroih,PE 786-453-9184 PKaimraih@chenmoore.com Chen Moore &Assoc. FDOT District 6 Tish Burgher 305-470-5277 Tish.Burgher@dot.state.fl.os 2020- Ongoing 2023- Ongoing 2017- 2022 'B8CC Engineering job.MIAMI BEACH 0 MIAMI BEACH I II-II9 }IE$3J}AI!IILLSII)@:#I r "be TAB 2 EXPERIENCE G QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM [CONT.)I 2.3 EVIDENCE OF PRIOR WORKING EXPERIENCE D O ur Team's history of collaboration and fa miliarity with each other's strengths/areas oh expertise ensures seam less coordination and the delivery of compre hensive engineering services as per the scope of w ork. With 70 projects worked on collectively ([those relevant to this project are displayed below/on the page that follows),including 5 with GCES,26 with Manuel G.Vera &Associates,8 with lntera,17 with Miller,Legg &Associates,and 14 with Media Relations Group,our collective expertise inspires co nfidence in our ability lo deliver exceptional results,fostering a successful partnership for project success. •,owo~,rnokOod o,;d,-Soow~~~~~~:~~~I~ • CITY OF SARASOTA , City-Wide Bridge Rehabilitation &/ Seawall Hazard Mitigation/Repairs '~ ~a..er hi(.~.MIAMl·OADE WATER &SEWER DEPARTMENT ~ Silver Bluff Neighborhood Im provem ents [ 4 Il ~I i,\.i '4 ~:~c~~!1°!:~e~~~~D:;r~ices Continuing,.,C Seawall Master Plan q ' FO OT DI STRICT 6 .:\ Palmetto Expressway Section 5 Canal lg Bulkhead W alls DB PROJECTS COMPLETED TOGETHER 5 COMPLETEDWITHGCES 8 COMPLETEDWITHINT 14 COMPLETEDWITHMRG 17 COMPLETEDWITHMLA 2 6 COMPLETEDWITHMGV '- ~~CITYOFMIAMIBEACH @·.Seawall Replaiplacement at 48"ST hlr i e/sr&29srl ....:"••••hosr.w;oo /DTYOFMIAMIBE 8..•Various s ACH•de seawall Replacements MIAMIBEACH .0 MIAMI BEACH £III±±I0.I8 3I 3IL'III IIJJI)IELILE 3·13+737F/5 2)23 234 'VG [__nc...... TAB 2 EXPERIENCE &QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM AND TEAM (CONT)I 2.3 EVIDENCE OF PRIOR WORKING EXPERIENCE [CONT.l Seawall Replacement at 48"ST and 29 ST Miami Beach,Fl ,voes»s.an own » "a The project area was primarily residential lying within the City of Miami in a neighborhood known as Silver Bluff The existing water services were 2-inch,2 '-inch,and 3-inch lines that ran within the public right-of-way and connected lo distribution lines tho!ran along rear property easements.Many of the properties were served by backyard meters.BCC's design services included utility coordination and verification that the proposed water mains and services were not in conflict with the existing underground transmission and distribution lines. This high-profile DB project includes the design and construction of the replacement for the existing the bridge over Old Tampa Bay ond removal of the existing NB 1960'existing bridge.The project undertakes major additions and changes to the existing roadway system by adding express lanes, enhancing safety,adding capacity and mobility,and accommodating future light rail.1,000 LF of [seawall comprised oh cantilevered and anchored sheet pile as well as anchored king-pile systems. I s ·5c ,This $559 million-dollar DB project consisted of the reconstruction of one of the busiest interchanges in Palmetto Expressway iection .anal Florida.With over 500,000 vehicles traversing the facility on a daily basis,it took skilled coordination {5 Bulkhead Walls DB and oversight to build this four-level system-to-system interchange consisting of 47 bridges,including Mi ·-Dade C FL four segmental directional tlyover ramps.2,500 LF of new bulkhead wall including both cantilevered iami-Dade ounty,and anchored sheet pile walls for the realignment of the Northline Canal. f-I;~~tu·;~I-En;ne~·;i~•;··S:-;·vices The City-~:ns approximatel;·4_3 mi.of seawall structures and 2.0 miles of natural banks.This task 6 Continuing Seawall Moster Pion work order,under the City of Fort Lauderdale's Continuing Structural Services Contract awarded I 'to BCC,required the assessment of the comprehensive needs of these structures and banks,and font Lauderdale,fl development of a Seawall Master Plan throughout the City. BCC has performed over 650 miscellaneous Task Work Order structural assignments including plans reviews,3R evaluations,miscellaneous structure design,and structural design support ot District staff.Assignments also included MOT,public involvement (meetings,outreach),signing, pavement markings,phased construction,and Technical Special Provisions. The BCC Team is performing thorough inspections and evaluations of several seawall projects throughout the City.The Team is identifying the specific problems affecting each seawalls.Tasks involve preparing detailed designs and remediation plans tailored to address the identified deficiencies, ensuring long-term durability and effectiveness of the seawalls in protecting their respective areas from erosion and water-related damage. This project involves repairs to the major concrete bridge structure carrying SR5/Overseas Highway Over Channel 5 in the Florido Keys.The 4923'long bridge supports 2 traffic lanes and criticol utilities.BCC investigated the existing bridge and field conditions.BCC prepared design construction documents,and plans for the rehabilitation of the bridge substructure.One innovative aspect of the project involved the use of thermal scanning and imagery to assess the existing conditions and map deficiencies.This enabled the creation ot project-specific repair details and accurate quantity calculations required to avoid overruns and delays during construction. Silver Bluff Neighborhood 3 Improvements Miami-Dade County,Fl r··-·•----- 4 I Howard Frankland Bridge Seawalls OB Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties,FL 7 Structures Design Districtwide,FL -iC~-~~~-.Br~dge Re~o~it:iM ~ 1 8 Seawall Hazard Mitigation Sarasota,FL ···-·---··----- lchannel 5 Bridge Rehabilitation9MonroeCounty,FL I This project was completed as port of BCC's Professional A&E Services Agreement;with the City of Miami Beach.The replacements will consist of new precast panel and pile seawalls at 48 St and North Bay Rd (±60')and 29 Si and Flamingo Dr (±40')BCC is also providing permitting services (MB Building Dept,SFWMD and the MDC RER),a benthic survey and geotechnical report for each seawall (provided by the supporting subconsultant team),structural and civil engineering services for the project- This project is a task work order for the ongoing City of Miami Beach Professional A&E in specialized categories The project involves civil engineering services associated with on-site modifications caused by the replacement of the seawalls throughout the City New seawalls will replace existing seawalls in bad structural condition City of I Giancarlo Pena,PE I 2021- Miami Beach 305-673-7490 %***Gpena@miamibeachfl.gov Ongoing ---- City of I Giancarlo Pera,PE I 2020-ltMiamiBeach305-673-7490 trGpena@miamibeachfl.gov Ongoing M•--D d Wt I Rey Abreu lformerlyw/WASDt)2007_ 1 *am-a e a er 305-631-2208 &Sewer Dept.Reynaldo.Abreu@exp.com 2009 ----- ue winers 2029- FDOT D7 ]813-849-7509 2025 (Eu.)[ Elizabeth.winters@dot.state.fl.us.'S! Mario Cabrera,PE I 2009-l%FDOT D6 ]305-640-7445 2016Mario.Cabrera@dot.state.fl.us City of I Brandy Leighton,PE I 2016-lt954-828-5326FortLauderdaleBleighton@forlauderdale.gov l 2017 Andra Diggs,PE I 2013-itFDOTDI407-264-3988 2018AndraDiggs@dot.state.fl.us --- Comden Mills,PE 1 2022-l#City of Sarasota 1 863-519-2300 OngoingComden.mills@sarasotall.gov Pablo Orozco,PE 305-470-5370 2015-/FDOT D6 I ,oS.o,o=©d o>••"H "'2025 (Es1.) MIAMI BEACH * ** ** * * * * o engineering OETTING THEREJUSTGOTEASIER' -·,,_:-~~-- - MIAMI BEACH '--•--·••-.-.•-;1111111111 k##·e -+g gt j .••.·-··t, $a -ld SOLICITATION 2024-234-ND /I'I APPROACH Ii METHODOLOGY ' «so EIIIEE7III0 SE-JI3 HD)#AILI.III3 MIU III SIU:LIE; 3 0 !M+y r 0 y 94 -2 94-3¥D TAB33.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3.1.1 SITE INVESTIGATION &FEASIBILITY STUDIES: Th e BC C Team is intimately fam iliar and experienced w ith site investigation and feasibility studies fo r a w ide ra nge of South Florida structures ra nging from vertical structures to bridges and seaw alls.Perhaps the best example of our experience specific to seaw alls is the City of Fort Lauderdale Seaw all M aster Plan (SM P).Th at project involved appro ximately 4.3 miles of city-ow ned seaw all struct ures and 2.0 miles of natura l banks. Structure locations ra nged from the lntra coastal Waterw ay to residential neighborhoods such as the Las O las Isled,and high- tra ffic areas such as along the N ew River in dow ntow n Fort Lauderdale.Seaw all types ranged from concrete soldier pile/ panel,steel sheet pile,and cora l rock/slurry.Seaw alls supported infrastructure ranging from iconic facilities such as the Sw imming Hall of Fam e,historic parks,to running alongside or at the end of public streets or drivew ays.Th e SM P required extensive site investigation and data collection on a regional scale to assess the structura l,geologica l,and enviro nmental conditions as w ell as right-of-w ay and ow nership.Th is investigation w as then used to support an extensive feasibility study at the hear t of the SM P.The study included design,construction,and permitting cost estimates and schedules for seaw all repair and replacem ent alternatives,City Seaw all Standar ds,and seaw all prioritization forecast out 20 years so that the City could plan and budget needed pro ject s.SM P documentation also consisted of individual in-depth seaw all inspection reports detailing the above and below -w ater condition of each seaw all component,as w ell as a report including an executive level summ ar y of findings,recom m endations,and feasibility of solutions based on fa ct ors such as impacts,use of innovation w here appro priate minimizing disruption,resiliency,and co st. Th e SM P also addressed challenges associated w ith Sea Level Rise (SLR)such as potential structura l modifica tions,bank/ shoreline stabilization,raising seaw all heights,and alignment w ith the City's Residential Seaw all O rdinance outlining criteria for w hen residential seaw alls require raising to mitigate SLR. Lastly,BCC completed the SM P assignment on an aggressive fo ur-m onth schedule in order to have the report finalized so pro jects could be budgeted for the next Fisca l Year . Th e pro cess utilized on the SM P w ill be similar to the one w e envision for this contra ct and the City of M iami Beach. Th e follow ing details the key steps of our approach and methodology for site investigations and feasibility studies. Kickoff Meeting O ur Team's first action w ill be to perfo rm a desktop review of available information.Fo r seaw all projects,w e prefer to perform M IA M I BEA C H a joint field review with City staff,and then pull together senior Team members for a Kickoff Meeting to engage the City staff and/or consultants to discuss overa ll approach and the City's vision and goals.At that time,our Team will also introduce solutions that introduce innovation where appropriate,minimize cost and impacts,and maximize seawall service life. Technical Assessments and Gather Information Existing Information:Compiling all existing information such as w all locations,existing plans and SLR data will be critical for creating our plan of action for each pro ject.Identifying community and public stakeholders along with important pro perties/fa cilities abutting the pro ject will be identified and documented.A central filing location such as Pro jectW ise w ill house all info rmation gathered to fa cilitate access for all Team members.Desktop reviews also help confirm latest field conditions and access.Review of this information will also help the development of a uniform Condition Assessment System and Naming Convention that could be used to establish and document the City's seaw all inventory. Field Evaluations:Field evaluations will include "top side"inspection as well as subaqueous inspections completed by our specialized underwater inspector/divers.Our approach to quality inspections begins before the team is mobilized.Pro per planning establishes a "ro admap" fo r the inspection pro cess,which is needed to ensure the overa ll quality,efficiency,and most importantly,safety of those involved.O ur Team is very familiar with maintaining safety including strong currents and high traffic areas such as the intracoastal waterw ays and will use extreme caution when underw ay and opera te at Idle Speed/No W ake throughout the entirety of the pro ject to ensure the safety of our personnel and to ensure the safety of any manatees or other mar ine life loca ted within the area.W e understand the importance of keeping a safe distance (over 50ft)away from any manatee and w ill follow all FW C's rules and regulations if one is encountered during the inspection process. O ur Team will utilize a prepared inspection field book to organize and collect field data to ensure a comprehensive inspection. Th is field book will include checklists that are required to be filled out prior to leaving the site to ensure all data is co llected and avoid the need for return visits.During this planning phase, o Subaqueous inspections. «rs«oar ±I.IEE±II .)IJ HJ~SzJIIIJ I)LIU 3LIE8 »9±1troy 2924-234-3) bc TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J our Team w ill update our current field inspection template and Q A checklist w ith this contra ct's sco pe para meters and any special inspection provisions.Th e inspection site w ill then be assessed for additional inspect ion equipment needed (N DT equipm ent,sounding equipment,access equipment,etc.)as w ell as co nditions pertinent to the dive team.A site-specific dive opera tion plan w ill also be created and address anticipated site conditions. W hile w e use innovation such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV's,drones), GPR,and thermal imagery to gather intelligence, w hen it comes to seaw all inspect ions,be believe "the old w ays are the best w ays"and nothing beats engineers in the field to put eyes on the structure.O ur •hands-on inspect ion teams ar e comprised of multiple individuals fo r safety and efficiency.Above-w ater teams ar e comprised of the responsible Professional Engineer (assessment),a Junior Engineer (docum entation),and a boat captain.Th e seaw all is thoro ughly inspected,cra ck w idths and lengths measured,and hamm er sounding used to delineate deficiencies that may not be visible from surfa ce defe ct s.Dive teams are comprised of Certified Bridge Inspectors w ith the responsible Lead Diver (assessm ent),support Diver (safety and assistance),and a boat captain.O ne innovative aspect our above-w ater team has found effective is to utilize a laptop containing the inspection report spreadsheet tem plate to populate the inspect ion report in real tim e as the inspection pro gresses.Th is includes conditions as w ell as deficiency dimensions and repair limits used to calculate repair quantities and construction co sts.In this w ay, the dra ft inspection report pro duction begins the second w e put boots on the ground and is completed as soon as our inspection team returns to the office and receives the underw ater inspection intelligence.Th is process has been performed on many of our seaw all inspection projects and has pro ven to increase our overall turnaro und tim e on inspection reports and impro ve the quality of our delivera bles. ¥.' a Staff gathering data in the field. Survey:W e will prepar e a "Specific Purpose Survey"to support the seawall design and plans.Notably,City of Miami Beach Seawalls often abut private pro perty. Th erefore,our focus early on will be to resear ch Right-of- W ay info rmation in order to avoid creating a "gap"betw een the City seawall and the private seaw all.O ur survey effort will utilize innovative and technologically advanced solutions such UAV's to pick up pertinent information.As a result,coordination with stakeholders such as the Port of M iami,US Coast G uar d Miami Sector,and Miami International Airpor t will be important early on.W e will first coordinate our appro ach closely with the City Surveyor and Pro ject Management.Th en,for flight restricted areas such as the airport or port,our FAA-certified UAV pilots obtain security clear ances,and employ Terrestrial Li DAR and ro botics. O ur Team hos had outstanding results with this appro ach on lar ge sca le,regional projects such as this were the use of this innovation improves safety,establishes a documented photographic record of conditions,and reduces project schedule. W e combine these methods with use of GPS and co nventional survey to "fill in any gaps"and provide comprehensive survey information with speed,accura cy,and efficiency.In the ca se of a feasibility study,design-level accura cy may not be required. How ever,using our approach,design level of accuracy can be achieved with minimal additional effort,pro viding the City with optimal value.More importantly these technologies allow us to place safety at the forefro nt of our work plan by reducing risks to the public and our M O T-trained survey technicians. Environmental:Ascertaining the enviro nmental permitting needs is one of the key steps in seawall investigation.W e will evaluate each seaw all to determine the appro priate level of permitting required by the South Flor ida W ater Management District (SFW M D),U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)and/ or the Florida Depar tment of Enviro nmental Protection (FD EP). It is anticipated that many of the seawalls should qualify for an exemption with SFW M D under Chapter 62-330.051 (12), w hich would also qualify for Section 404 approval under the State Progra mmatic Genera l Permit VI (SPGP VI).For seawalls that do not qualify under the exemption criteria of the SPGP VI, individual permits with the respective agencies will be required. W e w ill hold pre-application meetings or coordinate early with Sample LiDor still. MIAMI BEA C H socs ±JI0ILE±III5$:III8 7ZIIIIJ III)LJI JI)LIB3 39±Ir!no4 39±4-224-3JD9 TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY [CONT.J be the permitting agencies to confirm the permitting requirements and appro priate level of permitting needed.O ur Team has extensive experience w orking w ith local,state,and federal permitting agencies for pro jects of all sizes,and understands the needs of these agencies w hen submitting the permit applications.W e review project permits w ith the City at the project kickoff meeting,and coordinate all permitting submittals w ith City staff prior to submitting to agencies. G eotechnical:O ur geotechnical approach to this pro ject is to provide support to the design Team during the seaw all investigation process,including assisting w ith evaluating failure mechanisms and assisting w ith design recommendations for replacement w alls.If needed to verify cause and origin of wall fa ilure or fa r new w all design soil para meters,soil borings (on land or over w ater)may be co mpleted.N ew sea walls are usually installed in front of the existing w alls.In our experience, aging sea w alls often fail fo r one of the follow ing reasons: •Inadequate w all em bedm ent into the soil [soil loss under the wall or leaning w all).Probing along the base of the w all can som etimes verify shallow w all em bedm ent. Depressions behind the seaw all may be observed and indicative of loss of fines. •Deteriora ted sealer or cracks/gaps in wall or segment joints (soil loss thro ugh w all).Evidence often observed as depressions behind w alls at w all joints or visible cra cks/ gaps in front of w all.A soil delta may be visible in the w ater in front of w all at joints. •Buckling failure (w all bow s outw ard,structura l fa ilure or loss of latera l resistance/tie-backs).In this case,the wall is no longer in alignment w ith near by w all segments and has pushed outw ard. Coastal Engineering and Hydraulics:BCC and lntera Incorporated (lntera ),in particular,have a long history working together addressing seaw alls having w orked on the SM P as w ell as the How ar d Fra nkland Bridge project.lntera will begin w ith data collection of the different SLR scenarios currently published.Th is includes the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Clim ate Change (IPCC)recommendations.O ther data co llection w ill include w ind records,historical hurricane activity M IAM I BEACH and measured gage and high water mar k data.The Team will then meet with City to discuss the different projections as well as the desired goals regarding design frequencies,time horizons, risks regarding overtopping rates and integration with existing stormwater systems.The next task involves developing different design scenarios as combinations of SLR combined with waves generated by either hurricanes or seasonal fronts as well as the contribution of tides and storm surge.Th e wave climate at the ar eas of interest can then be evaluated either deterministically or probabilistically through performing Monte Car lo simulations and determining the expected value of the wave climate experienced over the structure's specified lifetime associated with a specific return period (probability of occurrence).From the genera ted simulations,the walls'reco mmended heights can optimized to satisfy the design criteria.Notably,care must be taken to ensure that the wall heights do not adversely affect neighboring properties as per FEM A regulations.This would require additional wave modeling once the optimized height has been developed and possible modification to the recommendations so as not to violate FEM A recommendations. Seaw all Altern atives A key step in the feasibility evaluation is determining the optimal solution,ranging from repair,rehabilitation and strengthening to replacement.The basis hinges on identifying the root cause of the issue or deficiency,meeting the project need,and confirming the seawall service life goal.Understanding the site- specific conditions,wall orientation,ground conditions (loss of fill behind walls),the results of hammer soundings during inspections,and the adjacent and abutting pro perties and community are all key in determining the optimal project path. Shoreline protection options include ripra p,steel sheet pile, concrete panels,vinyl panels,and living shorelines.The appropriate selection of a seawall or shoreline protection will depend on the unique chara cteristics of the site.Factors such as SLR,tidal forces/wave action,enviro nment,scour requirements,and constructability help in determining the appropriate seawall for a specific site.Early coordination between the Structures,Coastal,and Geotechnical Engineers is par amount in determining the key design factor s for the sites and selecting an appropriate shoreline protection.With so many moving par ts during the feasibility analysis,it is important to capture info rmation logically to document design decisions and ar rive at the optimal solution.One tool we use during the feasibility phase is the below Seawall Evaluation Matrix shown as an example exercise.Th is matrix uses a point system Cracks observed in a seawall. «n o»«±I,IEEE S E)I E;7I#SL'III}AIU LJII SILIB3 JO!I+ry nI0 4 2924-234-34 9 be TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.) to distinguish preferred seaw all candidates from those that are less optim al,helping to hone the pro ject direct ion at an ear ly stage and maximize effi ciency.Based on this matrix and our holistic review of the site,the leading shoreline pro tection for this exam ple is steel sheet pile seaw alls.O nce the Coastal Engineer concludes their thorough evaluation of the sites,the matrix w ill be expanded w ith additional key design issues and shoreline protection options to determine the appropriate solutions.In this w ay,effort ca n be made to incorpora te living shorelines to maximize enviro nm ental responsibility. 3.1.2 PROJECT PLANNING AND DESIGN: O nce the planning aspect discussed in Section 1 is completed, the project moves into the production phase.Th e preparation of technica lly sound,high-quality,structural Plans and Specifications is BCC's strength.In the past 10 years,BCC has designed and detailed 697 infrastructure structures ranging from bridges to miscellaneous transportation structures to seaw alls.Th is planning and design experience has ingrained in us the necessary skill set to deliver this seawall pro ject.W e sEw Au n ow .Ek#% ISSUE I STRUCTURE TYPE DURABILITY ENVIRONMENT MAINTENANCE RESISTS SCOUR/ SURGE CONSTRUCTABILITV DESIGNCONSTRUCTION COSTAESTHETICS TOTAL CONCRETE PILE / PANEL CONCRETE SHEET PILE STEEL SHEET PILE CAST IN PLACE VINYL SHEET PILE KEV FACTORS 2 2 2 2 3 2 t 2 3 1 3 2 '2 2 1 3I. 1 '·2 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 l .2 1 3 2 l ;.. 2 3 3 1 2. 2 3 2 1 3 12 14 19 9 16 I ! Difficult to install Constructabiltiy Difficult to install ! M ultiple in har d soil layers,Commonly issues include in hard soil layers,construction steps,does not tolerate accepted as the excavation,does not tolera te i preferred wall type IrequiresripraptoI resist scour.lar ge bending fo r this applica tion.dew atering,on-site lar ge bending moments.workmanship.moments. to -------------- Th e real pow er of this matrix is it helps avoid a co mmon pitfall of planning and feasibility studies.Specifically,studies can lack in true "feasibility."Th is is not an issue w ith our seaw all feasibility studies,because our feasibility evaluations are performed by structura l Pro fessional Engineers w ho have designed and constructed seaw alls thro ughout Florida.To that end,w e find that our experience constructing and repairing a w ide ra nge of seaw alls in a w ide ra nge of locations and conditions has tra nslated extremely w ell to adapting our seaw all designs to accommodate construct ion aspects such as shallow w ater, lim ited access,presence of utilities or submerged resources, and har d soil layers/profiles.In this w ay,considering constructability and how the seaw all structura l system comes together is a key fa ctor ensuring that our seaw all feasibility evaluations get "real w orld"results. find successful plan delivery comes down to two key aspects: •First,"it star ts at the top"with the assignment of a Pro ject M anager who has seaw all experience and ensures accountability of the design team. •Second,a disciplined appro ach is used to fo llow the plans production process,obtaining information at the right time,and ensuring interim deadlines as well as the final deadline are met. Th e text that follow s summar izes,in more detail,our approach to delivering plans,specifications,and design drawings for the City's seaw alls. M IAM I BEAC H «nos :II%INIEIIJ SI}#JS:III;IJ LI)II)JI1IE; 30!1Mr0»2924-234-3ID TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONTJ be Project Management BC C's proposed PM ,Christian Aquino,PE,SI,FRSE,is the BCC Team's sole point of contact.Christian has designed and managed infrastructure structura l projects fo r over 19 year s and served as the Engineer-of-Record for important City of M iami Beach seaw all contracts such as the Fleet M anagement Seaw all Assessm ent and Repair,N ormandy Shores Par k Seaw all,and the Jefferson Street End Seaw all,as w ell as the Cityw ide Bridge Assessm ents and the Star Island Bridge Repair.It is Christian's philosophy that the City PM should never need to ask Christian the status of any item for the life of the contract,such as a m iscellaneous requests/emails,cost updates,schedule updates,or invoices.Christian alw ays keeps the City PM in the loop,and "over communica tes",such as informing the City PM of key schedule milestones and drivers and any additional needs.To keep the entire Team in the loop and maintain all information accessible,our FTP disseminates info rmation,files ar e kept on ProjectW ise,and Zoom/Teams,used routinely.Bi- w eekly Team meetings further avoid the potential for disconnects and schedule slips. A dditionally,the Schedule Control tool Christian finds most helpful to pull all this together is the weekly M onday morning BC C Struct ures M eeting after w hich everyone walks out accountable.Christan uses 30/60/90-day lookaheads to avoid surprises and red flags critica l items,such as key interim deadlines,or information needed from others,to ensure things stay on tra ck. Kickoff Meeting O ur Team's first action w ill be to perfo rm a desktop review of available information.For seaw all pro jects,we prefer to perform a joint field review w ith City staff,and then pull together senior Team members for a Kickoff M eeting to engage the City staff and/or consultants to discuss overa ll appro ach and the City's vision and goals.At that time our Team will also intro duce solutions that introduce innovation w here appro priate,minimize co st and impacts,and maximize seaw all service life. Community Outreach In our experience,M iami Beach residents ar e extremely aw ar e of,and sensitive to,seaw all w ork.W hile they understand that seaw all w ork is necessary to maintain stability and boundaries, it is important to minimize disruption and construction exposure, M IAM I BEACH and maintain access and services.Our community outreach appro ach for seawall pro jects is aimed at informing,educating, and updating using a consistent,technically sound message. Our Engineers embrace an active role in community outreach. O ur Engineer of Record provides full support and attends all public meetings.Occasionally the City Council may require updates.So our Engineer of Reco rd also participates in City Council Meetings should the City Engineer or Project Manager require it. At the onset of a project,our first task will be to identify and notify each of the affected stakeholders of the proposed improvements and give the opportunity to provide feedback. Notifications can include a mailed newsletter to the property owners and tenants,emails to elected officials,social media posts,and newspaper or other public advertisements.Our Team has web designers that currently operate and maintain pro ject websites.W e will develop the project website to keep the public informed on the project,and the website will be listed on notifications to stakeholders.Our team has conducted dozens of public meetings,workshops and public hearings.W e can also have small group meetings with stakeholders and be included as part of regular meetings that the stakeholders may already conduct.W e have done this on several projects,and it gives the stakeholders the opportunity to ask questions related solely to the project or impacts that are associated with their gro up,as opposed to being part of a larger public meeting. O ur team will also work closely with the City to develop a community outreach and public involvement plan that best suit your needs. Approach to the Plans Production Process: City Seawall projects follow a specific process from concept to completion that requires specific and timely actions on the part of the design team in order to deliver the project on schedule. Below,we have outlined the 10 steps of a typical City seawall pro ject. 1.Scoping.Experienced staff visit site and review data.Meet with the City PM to confirm the City's sco ping/co st estimate as sumptions and any new factors. 2.Negotiations.Update the design Team per Step (1)and co mpile the SHE.Complete negotiations within 1 week Receive Notice to Proceed.Complete sub co nsultant Agreements. Disciplines finalize their Staff Hour Estimate (SHE),providing detailed co mments and backup. 3.Project Kickoff.All disciplines and specialists involved. «socs ±AILEE±RINI9 $JIVE3 HJ#'±I'IAIII8 II)LI'JI)JULIE3 30±1rry 2u24-234-3/9 TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY [CONT.J Submit schedule and Q uality Control Plan.Factors confirmed up front include criteria,third-par ty involvement,permits,need fo r permitting sketches,co nstructability.Keep City PM in the loop moving forw ar d. 4.Inspect ion.Th e basis for the Plans.Prepar e sketches to aid the Field Review .Experienced staff and specialists.Review all available information.Schedule and complete inspections. Focus on safety. 5.Inspection M em o.Document inspection findings and pro vide to City PM in order to confirm scope or red flag any scope changes stemming from the field review . 6.Plans Production.Seaw all projects are relatively stra ightfo rw ar d and do not require an abundance of phase subm ittals.Typica lly,w e fo llow a 30%/90%/100%Submittal Schedule.O ne thing that has helped the City's seaw all pro ject pro cess im mensely is BC C prepared the standard of what the seaw all plan set should look like.Th is includes plan content, fo rm at,ar rangement,minimum info rmation to be included,and com mon/standar d details then ensure longevity and minimize future maintenance. For example,many City seaw alls are located at the end of streets,requiring special considera tions and "w ra p around"w all end treatments to ensure stability of adjacent w alls and shoreline abutting each end of the seaw all.All this was done w ith close coordination w ith the City until the final product had the appear ance and co ntent that the City wanted.We look fo rw ard to continuing to build off that experience with this project! At the 30%phase,w e begin the utility coordination as well as the perm itting process w ith DERM ,Army Corps,etc.since the enviro nmental permitting is on the schedule's critical path.Also, at 30%,the w all geometry,limits,etc.is laid out.W e like to bring the "30%Submittal"up to "60%Submittal"completion, so pertinent details and all pay items,quantities,and costs.Th is goes a long w ay in expediting the design schedule for City of M iami Beach seaw all projects. At 100%,w e provide the signed and sealed plans and calculations,as w ell as a schedule and cost estimate to help the City prepare the bid documents.Given the fluctuation in cost, w e confirm cost escalation and pro vide interim quantity/co st updates as needed. M IAM I BEA C H W e have also helped prepar e bid documents packages,such as recently for the Town of Bay Har bor Islands Broad Causeway bridge repair.The City issues typical front-end Specifications, and we use the Plans to specify all else,such as concrete,steel, etc.,proving TSP's where necessar y,for example,Cathodic Protection. Th ro ughout this entire process,we do the little things right to make the City PM 's job easier.W e acquire existing information ourselves.BCC's W eekly Production Meetings,and Bi-Weekly Team meetings,ensure progress.W e also schedule time for Q uality Control,using checklists for each Phase to ensure completeness.W e take the lead in all meetings and distribute minutes.Invoices include Progress Reports,schedule,and payout curves. 7.Quality Control.All work products (plans,memos, specifications,estimates,etc.)prepared as part of this contract will be prepar ed in acco rdance with a documentable Quality Control (Q C)Plan that assures accountability,accuracy, completeness,legibility, application of appropriate design criteria,and good engineering practice.BCC will prepar e a contract specific Quality Management Plan (Q M P)that addresses the specific review process for each type of document and assigns specific reviewers to each task.BCC QC reviewers are highly experienced experts in their field.W e have identified which staff shall be responsible for QC for the major disciplines on this contract in our organizational chart.All sub consultants will be required to use BCC QM P for the contract.It is important to note that the Q M P will be specific to each TW O and considered a "living document"capable of being adjusted should the TW O needs change,i.e.a discipline added to the TW O,or a change in subconsultant staffing requiring confirmation of,and plugging in another qualified individual.Our QM P and processes go beyond the typica l 5-step QC process (i.e.Review,Comment, Resolution,Implementation,Verification check on plans). O ur QM P includes reviews for global/micro level issues by senior specialists,BCC's in-house CEI group reviews for constructability,and a QA of subs'work.Fro m the onset of any Ta sk W ork O rder (TW O)we will assign QC Reviewers per the contract QM P and include time in the schedule for QC reviews and co mment implementation and backcheck.Our QC also includes lessons learned.W eekly Meetings use "Experience o «r«sos»+EI0IIEEILJ$:III:3 1I)3 III18 AU LJJJ 3I0)1III; 39!!Aryn4 3924-234-31 bc gineerng TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J QUALITY CONTROL TRACKING STAMP PHASESUBMITTAL REVIEW Lad Tc.hie.t #rteto ADO teiia Gaalty trel ho e .# al t orel tar (g.) PROOUCTON CHE CN G COMPLETEREADYFORactvwATP CONCURRENCE LTP Agree (Red Chi 1 Dugre 4Red x-Ou vERcA nON Oc Cort GeeCh io lot Gen de 4,#ea ] QUALITY ASSURuANCE (QcMy BCC ENGINEERING,LLC BCC Structures' Innovative QC Border File avoids clutter on QC Prints! STEP 1 STEP2 STEP3 STEP4 STEP5 PRODUCTIONCHECKINGCOMPLETELIP) OC REVIEW(OCR) CONCURRENCE WITHCOMMENTSLIP) IMP.LEMENTATIOA(NCR mane lj Shar e"agenda items to ca pture know ledge gained from past experiences and shar e it w ith all staff.For example,after a "Shar e"including FDO T M ara thon O pera tions "Hot Issues," w e updated the Channel 5 Bridge Rehabilitation plan notes to m itigate varying conditions such as existing drilled shaft casing and shaft diam eters.W e take the same approach with the City's seaw alls,gleaning construction experience statew ide to fo ld into our seaw all designs. Here also,BC C w ent beyond the norm and developed mechanisms specifically designed to capture know ledge. BC C developed he "BC C SDG ",a structures Know ledge Base aligned in subject matter w ith the Sections of the FD OT "Structures Design G uidelines,"including items such as softw ar e nuances,non-Standard designs/details,and Florida-I Beam cam ber coefficients used to avoid beam sag in all our projects, to nam e a few .Staff apply the BC C SDG insights into design/ Q C on a w eekly routine. BCC has also gained valuable construction experience,and a deep appreciation for responsiveness,thro ugh completing $6B of FD O T Design-Build project s,mostly in M iami-Dade County. W e find our extensive Design-Build experience has tra nslated extre m ely w ell to BC C 's continuing services structures contracts, w hich require responsiveness,sound engineering,and viable solutions in an extremely short timeframe.Tying together the Q C Pro cess is our dated/initialed tracking stamp (including elect ronic/BlueBeam version)affixed to each delivera ble to docum ent that the Q C Pro cess from document origination to Q uality Assura nce has been co mpleted,by whom,and on w hat date.Yet again,BC C Structures w ent beyond the typical "tracking stamp"documentation.Specifica lly,BCC Structures developed an innovative Quality Contro l CADD Cell that runs up the vacant space on the side of the plan sheet border,saving space and avoiding clutter on the plan sheet. 8.Plans Review s.W e provide the City with a plan set PDF at each phase,and Public W orks reviews internally and provides comments in the form of plan mar kups.So we provide written responses and return them to the City to confirm that the City is satisfied with how we propose that review comments and markups be addressed in the Plans.W e also ensure phase review comment close out by incorporating a backcheck of City co mments/mar kups into the Quality Control process. 9.Advertisement.Review Pre-Bid questions and draft Pre-Bid responses for City concurrence ASAP. 10.Post Design Services.Review Materials Submittals and conduct Field Reviews as needed.Acknowledge RFl's immediately and respond/resolve within l day.We attend the PreCon M eeting,emphasizing any key aspects of the project. Our role is support,bringing expertise to the table to support construction and keep the pro ject on schedule. Our approach to project planning and design may be best exemplified by our recent Jefferson Avenue End Seawall project with the City of Miami Beach.For this project,we co mpleted the planning,design,and construction of a replacement seawall that include the exact same work mix that can be expected for this contract!Following are several before/after photos that "tell the story"of transforming a long term maintenance issue into a resilient new structure incorporating innovative ideas and materials. M IAM I BEACH o nI-s7<Lalraltr 3 alrc:::, La.alo=zc:::,2-ccolococor-I-1-U=c:iarrrc2eruocc<-. LU a.erco--C"':> 3 '<CCI »35=s'Ptai.i MIAMI BEACH 3IIE.±I0Is8 3ASAI'IIIISII LILI)IE4IE8 '5: TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY lCONT.1 I BEFORE Ii AFTER EXHIBITS RRti -~--,~..•••• $J f a [7ow.an..- #a±EA#k##l 4./FORTIFIES CANA& SLOPES '. DI ENO WALL WRAP-AROUNDTREATMENTMAINTAINSCONTINUITYWIT ,go""· ·:y/·f':.~'.••--,.... MAINTAININTEGRITYOFEXISTINGSEAWALL I MIAMI BEACH 0 •9 enI-s7><Lalr.alter 3 Lalro.a.la.lCIQ y-.,_:acoe-ccolococo:::cI-al==c::3aerr-r corOC)<<•o-. LLI a-.rco-5 co v3<1 co>£ aI.«, •2..s %%.3±no » _-"---~~-···•·. E:::; Gu ±2oznoralrrLu4oo.H •erL!Ioza>no==33arg -E-z=!::-ct=tead€.3 er r:,A.5 $r3.LU· ::::,.~aLu.IYr7I 2 #e ,· h-F£ $ ,-. LuLu ,Lal,g4..s «rs.soc EI.IEEE7III9 3)IE3 11JZIIAII8 I)LJJ 3E LI3 J9!Ir3f4 20 24 -234-3) be TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J BC C PRO A CTIV EL Y W O RK IN G TO M EET YO UR NEED S! We have already begun work!W e opened up a project file for each seawall identified in the RFQ,and began populating it w ith available documentation and inspection information.Specifically,we visited every single seawall location identified in the RFQ .Th e seaw alls ar e summar ized in the below table.O f the 56 seawalls identified in the RFQ,we identified 8 seawalls that can be considered representative of the overall conditions we can expect on this contract in terms of seawall type,age,surroundings, deteriora tion,and key aspect s.O ur Team then performed an initial assessment of the seawall and key issues driving the solution required at each location.Th ose 8 loca tions are featured in yellow outline in the below table,and the initial assessment detailed further on the fo llow ing pages. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SEAWALLS I :•7600 TATUM I BAY DRIVE6860NOIANCEEKwir@iiivtSi#ref ii -55HENEDONAVENUEIJONESSTREETENOSOUTHrt- BAYSIDE LANE VARDENSTREETEND BAYSIDE LANE FAIRWAY DRIVE HAGEN STREET END HENEDON AVENUE HENEOON AVENUESTREETENDSTREETENDBRIDGE I NORTH ! 04,,9 l,$274}$M2"ME±E es«nrao wsrs«era»o ssoesoo Irs«row "q]I9"f [j22",$?2},,%g"TI hsrsmer ao/son tao-,zstrao 'zswnrao,arserao!I CREEK DREEL., RUE VERSAILLES 1ST DI LIDO TERW42NDSTREETENDSTREETENDSOUTHSTREETENOWEST 2 4 STREET ENO }if 1 390 ALTON R0A0 /538 WEST AVENUE /798 S PP0ONIE ORIVE/800 S 0NIE DRE I 'em4al .'•'.nw-< @ d FLAMINGO DRIVEEND t%!'u w ow ,#%#a%,#rear 4 "%,"17STREET TOWESTAVE IGARDENAVENUEJEFFERSON AVENUE MIAMI BEACH ru<1LUc><= t-ciciE><I ru<<UJc-<1> O I-o:::c><Lal ,....paoe-cc::, lcoc::ic::,:::cI-.l=raer:::crc0eruc::,•<(o.a.LLI erco..... 5 O 3<<a::i 5 £ ru<<LLIco 5<> ~a5:c><a.I Lr I-ii:iE><Lal-i--:ao2-colocoo::r::I-a.l::E c:::iaer::r::r c2eruoa:<(o.•LLI erc,---o 3<cc>£ o I- CICI:::c><al=ac::::,>-cDc::::, looco:::ce.l=Clzer.:::crc2zuo•<<co.a.LI rco-5 O 3<<CICI 5 = ....... !:::gerXkl=acoe>-cc:::>loc::::ior-1--al:=!!: c:I=Irrrc.2ruc:::>o<ca-.o.UJ erc..... 5 3co<4 co>± =fl \ l s_,#r o co I- CC:::c<al o o sooa ±I)IE3II9 8:IV3 HBSZIIAII3II LJISELIE; 39!III01 2024-234-3)9 TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J be 3.1.3 BIDDING &CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT: W e appro ach municipal seaw all projects w ith the mindset of a Designer/Constructor.O ur job is not done until the City aw ar ds the job,constructs the job,and accepts the project as complete. W e also recognize that,compared to FDOT or County projects, m unicipal seaw all pro ject s require an enhanced level of support during the bidding and co nstruction process.In this w ay,w e consider responsive,steadfast support throughout Bidding and Post Design/Construction Management as a key driver to deliver the pro ject on schedule and within budget. Bidding Services Bidding services (services during the bidding processes) extend from responsiveness w hen addressing bid questions and requests fo r info rmation/clarification to completing the bid package.BC C has performed both services in the exact same capacity as this pro ject.M ost recently,for the FD O T District 6 Bridge Repair/Rehabilitation Plans Prepar ation contract,BCC provided response to Contractor bid questions for 25 bridge repair projects.During the bidding phase,it is important to respond to questions and information requests as soon as possible.Additionally,it is critica l that multiple perspectives be used to prepar e w ritten responses.BC C focuses on answering the direct question being posed,often consulting internally with our in-house Construction Engineering Inspections (CEI)ar m as w ell as BC C structures staff w ho also formerly worked as Contractors so offer a unique "C ontractor's side"perspective. BC C then provides a dra ft w ritten response,and the reasoning behind it,to the City Project M anager so that the City can finalize and issue the response.Should a follow up question be posed,the follow up question is addressed w ith the same level of urgency. Bid Package services (preparation of the bid package for advertisem ent)extend from pro viding support to City staff that ar e preparing the bid package,to prepar ing all aspects of the bid package to be posted w ith the pro ject advertisement.BCC recently supported County staff in this w ay as par t of the M iami Dade County Depar tment of Transportation and Public W orks Bridge Rehabilitation co ntra ct.For that contract,provided info rmation such as the pro ject description/scope,anticipated w ork activities,and stipulations to ensure traffic flow for tw o bridge repair projects in close pro ximity to one another that the County decided to advertise as a bundle.Additionally, BC C recently prepared the complete bid package for the To w n of Bay Har bor Islands Kane Conco urse Bridge O ver Indian Creek Bridge N o.875103.Key co mponents of the bid M IA M I BEA C H package included Contract Plans,Contract Specifications, Advertisement for Bids,Instructions to Bidders,Proposal,Bid Bond,Notice of Intent to Award,Agreement (Owner/Contractor Contract),Perfo rmance Bond,Notice to Proceed,General Conditions,Supplementar y Conditions,Cone of Silence, Collusion,Sworn Statement,and Technical Specifications. Construction Management Services BCC has a complete understanding of the Construction Management services required by the City of Miami Beach based on a thorough review of the Request for Qualifications (RFQ )and our experience managing construction of similar pro jects for the City.Typica lly,the BCC Project M anager and seawall Engineer of Record take the lead on Construction M anagement.However,should it be required, BCC's in-house CEI division provides additional resources. Th e following are the key points of our Construction Management Plan: ►Communication:At the core of any successful project is co mmunication between the client and consultant staff.Mr. Christian Aquino,PE (BCC Project Manager)will deliver the Construction Management scope of work.Mr.Aquino will: •Serve as the single point of contact on all CEI Services •Maintain continuous co mmunication with the City to ensure City expectations are being met •Personally perfo rm inspections and oversight •If needed,commit additional highly co mpetent,trained, and experienced CEI inspection and management pro fessionals •Review the funding sources for each project to identify any specific reporting or documentation requirements •Ta ke a pro active appro ach in identifying potential issues and presenting early resolutions •Utilize pro ject management tools such as Primavera, pro jectTracker®,and Deltek Vision to assure projects are delivered on time and on budget •Pro vide the City with up-to-date information on the status of all assigned work •Provide the City with updates on on-going work order and overa ll co ntract budgets,limiting amounts,funds expended to date,remaining funds versus commitments, etc. o «wo o+±III,IEEE3II9 3±III3 YU'III.IS A»IJ LI)II)ELI/I3 9!I+rf1)3924-±34-3)9 TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J be ►CEI Services Plan:We will analyze and evaluate the construction scope of work,constructability,biddability, sequence of construction,maintenance of traffic,utilities, environmental impacts,and permitting.CE!Services required by the City may not require continuous daily on-site inspections and that inspections may be limited to bi-weekly and/or during key construct ion events.BCC will tailor the proposed CE!Services to the specific needs of each project.BCC will then present the City with a proposed CE!Services Plan that will include staffing recommendations based on the proposed scope of services. ►Project Construction Kick-Off Meeting:BCC may lead the Construction Kick-Off Meeting with the City's Project M anager,the selected Contra ctor,assigned CE!staff,and key shar eholders.Th e pro ject scope of w ork w ill be discussed in detail including the pro ject purpose and goals,the pro posed im provements,permitting requirem ents,and any special co nsidera tions.Administra tive functions shall also be discussed such as m onthly pay applications,shop dra w ings,and requests for information (RFl's).Additional considera tions shall be discussed including key pro ject issues,sub-contractors,Team mem ber roles and responsibilities,and City expectations. Th e planning and scheduling of the Construction Kick-O ff M eeting w ill be coordinated w ith the City's Pro ject M anager. ►Project Schedule:Th e submittal,review ,and acceptance of a detailed schedule is essential for measuring construction progress.BCC w ill coordinate w ith the select ed Contractor to submit the Schedule w ithin 30 days of the aw ard of the Construct ion Contra ct and prior to the Pro ject Construct ion Kick-O ff M eeting.BC C w ill then review the schedule fo r critical com ponents such as the N otice to Proceed Date,contract dura tion,utility relocations,shop dra w ing subm ittals,material pro curem ent,M aintenance of Tra ffic (M O T)sequencing,m ajor activities,and logical predecessor-successor relationships. Critical ltemsofW ork (Cl O W )w ill beclearlyidentified fortra cking. ►Project Coordination and Public O utreach:Th e City of M iami Beach has a diverse gro up of key stakeholders that could include residents,schools,and influential businesses. BC C w ill assist the City's Project M anager w ith co ordinating w ith critical stakeholders prior to the start of any pro ject to explain the upcoming opera tions,schedule,and anticipated im pacts.Although these individuals may have been involved in the pro ject from early on,this coordination w ill help establish realistic expectations that m ay be communicated to other stakeholders.Stakeholders may also be invited to the Project Construct ion Kick-O ff M eeting and any scheduled Pre- O pera tion M eetings.W e w ill assist the City's Project M anager M IA M I BEA C H in fa cilitating any Public W orkshops or City Comm ission W orkshops that m ay be required.W e find our involvem ent in such w orkshops is very helpful in answ ering co nstruction- related questions related to schedule,noise,and dust concern s. ►Unfo reseen Issues:Unforeseen field issues that cannot be resolved at the field level require responsiveness.Upon being informed of an unfo reseen issue,M r.Aquino imm ediately visits the pro ject site to w itness the issue first-hand and seek input.A thorough review of the contra ct docum ent w ill then be performed to assist in fo rmulating an appropriate resolution recomm endation to the City.A ny open issues ar e also discussed at every progress m eeting including the fo llow - up actions required from every responsible party.Th e goal is to quickly identify and resolve unfo reseen field issues before im pacting the pro ject schedule and budget,and maintain accountability and action.Th is appro ach to identifying and resolving unforeseen and design issues has pro ven to be the single most effect ive w ay of mitigating tim e and cost impacts. ►Change O rders:W hen unfo reseen issues ar e identified that w ill require a Change O rder to the Contra ctor's contra ct ,BC C w ill ensure that the payments requested of the City ar e fa ir and justified.BC C w ill immediately request a Change O rder Request (C O R)from the Contra ctor w hile co ncurrently pro ducing an Engineer's Estim ate (EE).BC C w ill estimate the labor,m aterials, and equipment required to complete the extra w ork.Labor ra tes and burden shall be estimated based on industry ra tes gathered during BC C's substantial recent experience in managing construction contract s.Th e Contractor's act ual labor rates and burden ra tes m ay be used if certified by an O fficer of the Firm.Equipment ra tes shall be based on published Equipment W atch Rental Rate Blue Book.M aterials costs w ill be estimated based on actual price quotes fro m an extensive collection of vendor s BC C has assembled.Utilizing these resources,and our experience,an EE w ill be assem bled fo r the extra w ork. O nce the Contra ctor has subm itted their CO R,the EE w ill be utilized to negotiate the price until the City has received a fa ir and justifiable Change O rder amount fo r the extra w ork. ►CEI Inspect ion Staff :O nce construct ion begins,BC C w ill coordinate w ith the City's Pro ject M anager for the addition of CEI staff based on the pro ject needs and the agreed-to budget.In co ordination w ith the City,BC C w ill only subm it personnel approval requests w hen w ar ra nted by on-going construct ion act ivities and o «rs»a a»:IIIEEIIJS:RI,}1UZI'IAVISMIU JIS IL I S »0!IHy r Iy 20 24-234-3¥) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT) be w ill reduce staff hours,or positions outright,as sco pe co mponents are advanced and co mpleted.Th e goal is the efficient use of the City's budget w hile meeting the quality dem ands of the project.Th rough the life of the contra ct,BCC w ill pro vide the City's Project M anager w ith an updated monthly CEI Availability and Tra ining M atrix.Th is w ill pro vide the City's Pro ject M anager w ith an updated and easy to read matrix of the qualified and available CEI staff available to serve the City's needs. ►Maintenance of Traffic [MOT):Th e Proper Installation of M O T Devices is essential for safe and effi cient tra nsit through any co nstruction project undertaken by the City.BC C w ill take a systematic approach to ensure that proper M O T planning and installation is accomplished on every assigned pro ject to minimize any further inconvenience to the public.Pre-O peration M eetings w ill be held w ith all interested par ties such as the City's Pro ject M anager,the City of M iami Beach Police Department, Fire Rescue,and any other affected businesses or residents. ►Contractor Payments:On a m onthly basis,the Contractor shall submit to BC C a Payment Certificate for the w ork accomplished during the recently co mpleted w ork period. BC C w ill review the Payment Certifica te and w ill evaluate the requested quantities of w ork and their co rresponding value.BCC w ill recom mend appro val or rejection of the Payment Certificate to the City's Project M anager based on BCC's field observations and the results of any testing required by the Contra ct Documents.W e w ill im mediately conduct a meeting w ith the Contra ctor to discuss any exceptions taken to their subm itted Payment Certificate with the goal of expediting the re-subm ittal of a Payment Certificate agreeable to all par ties.Th is same procedure w ill be utilized thro ugh the execution of the Contractor's final Payment Certificate. ►As-Builts:During construction BC C shall ensure that the Contract or is m aintaining an As-Built set of plans documenting all field changes and modifica tions.Th is set of As-Built documents shall be review ed at least monthly w ith the Contractor to ensure that any deviations from the approved design documents are being recorded in a timely,accura te,and com plete fa shion. O nce construction has been com pleted,BC C shall tra nsmit the Contract ors A s-Built documentation to the EO R so that they m ay revise the original design documents to "Final As-Builts." ►Substantial Completion,Final Acceptance,and Project Closeout:O nce the pro ject scope of work has been completed,the Contractor shall submit a Contractor's Request for Substantial Completion Inspection.BCC shall perform a thoro ugh examination of the pro ject site and will recommend execution of a Certifica te of Acceptance fo r Substantial Completion if the pro ject has been fo und to be substantially complete as per the Contract Documents.BCC will then coordinate with the City's Project Manager and representatives for the City's Public W orks Depar tment to schedule and conduct the Substantial Compliance Inspection.During this inspection, a Punch List will be generated listing all deficiencies and discrepancies noted in the W ork requiring co rrection by the Contractor.Th e Punch List will also include any initial star t-up, testing,adjustment,and balancing of any specialty equipment and/or systems;tra ining of City personnel in the operation and maintenance of said specialty equipment and/or systems; and the final cleaning and debris removal of the pro ject site.BCC will track the co mpletion of the Punch List items and will notify the City's Project Manager when the pro ject site is ready fo r Final Acceptance. Prior to the execution of a Certificate of Final Acceptance and the Contractor's final Payment Certificate,BCC will ensure that all final documentation has been submitted,reviewed,and accepted.Final documentation will all warranties,opera ting and maintenance manuals,As-Built information,and any other documents required by the Contract Documents.O nce all documentation has been received and approved,BCC will recommend the execution of a Certificate of Final Acceptance and the Contractor's final Payment Certificate. ►Budget Monitoring and Control:Adhering to the established CEI Services budget is vital in providing value to the City.At the star t of each assigned construction pro ject, BCC's Project M anager will meet with the assigned CEI staff to ensure that the Scope has been effectively communicated and that each staff member understands the requirements of their assignment,the approved weekly billable hours,as well as the respective budgets.During the project,the BCC Project Manager will provide co nstant monitoring of the hours being billed to the pro ject,the percentage of the budget expended, and the remaining budget for completion of the assignment. cu.me isisnaumnc APPROACH TO ENSUR E THATPROPERMOTPLANNINGANDINSTALLATIONISACCOMPLISHEDONEVERYASSIGNEDPROJECT t T 0MINIMIZE AN Y FURTHER ' INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC. M IAM I BEA C H 0o «ro es 6 ±I,IIEEE#III)3III,E3 1J $III13 II)LJ)II I 1JI; 39±1f r0»2924-224-3/) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.1 Th e BC C Project M anager w ill utilize BC C's Deltek Vision accounting and project management softw ar e to perfo rm these checks to ensure the budget is being adequately contro lled. M onthly reports w ill be issued to the City's Project M anager detailing the budget status of each assigned w ork order. ►Quality Assurance/Quality Control:BC C 's commitment to quality w ill begin w ithin 30 days after selection for an assignment w ith the subm ittal of our CEI Q uality Assura nce Plan.The goal of the Q A Plan is to ensure that BCC is pro viding quality CEI services in com pliance w ith the contractual documents including the CEI Scope of Services.Th e Q A Plan w ill detail the pro cedures and evaluation criteria utilized during bi-annual QA Review s.Q A Review findings w ill be shar ed w ith the BCC Team at a post- review meeting w ithin one w eek to implement improvements w hen needed.A fo rmal Q A Review report,w ith findings and proposed im pro vements,shall be submitted to the City's Pro ject M anager w ithin 2 w eeks of the review .These efforts are also designed to stream line the post-construction close-out phase. Im mediately after Final Acceptance,BC C w ill immediately prepare the final payment package fo r submittal to the City.All permits shall be closed by this tim e,all w arra nties submitted, Final As-Built Plans completed,and all material issues resolved. 3.1.4 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING: G C ES is a firm specializing in geotechnical engineering, co nstruction materials testing,and engineering services in South Florida.W ith a history of successful projects in the public and private sectors,GC ES has established a stro ng tra ck record. Th eir team is highly experienced in pro viding geotechnica l engineering and construct ion materials testing services for infrastructure projects,including seaw alls in South Florida.ln fa ct ,one of GC ES's ar eas of specialization is geotechnical support services fo r county and city projects in M iami-Dade County,including the City of M iami Beach.For his seaw all pro ject,GC ES w ill pro vide geotechnical engineering services in genera l accordance w ith City of M iami Beach guidelines, project specifications,and other required guidelines and standar ds.Relevant sim ilar services GC ES has provided include geotechnical evaluations to evaluate site conditions and suitability fo r new and existing seaw alls by perfo rming geotechnical borings and site analysis.GC ES is very familiar w ith the specific soil,rock,groundw ater conditions in South Florida having provided recomm endations on the most cost- effective fo undation options for planned structures considering South Florida subsurfa ce conditions such as limestone,hard layers,sand,shell,organics requiring delineation on a site-by- site basis,and high-w ater table. M IAM I BEA C H In this way,our approach will include pro ject initiation,existing data collection,field reco nnaissance,field exploration, laboratory testing and report writing.Prior to beginning each phase of the explora tion,we will submit a detailed boring location plan for review and meet with the City Project M anager to review the project scope and requirements.The geotechnical services will include a review of all existing soils and foundations,information including exiting foundation plans,as well as printed literature including USDA Soil Survey, USG S Q uadra ngle maps and any existing geotechnical info rmation.W e will supplement this data with additional explora tions and laboratory testing pro gra ms,which will be used fo r performing geotechnica l engineering analysis to provide recommendations for design of seawall structures. Th ese pro jects are expected to involve coordination with an approval of boring locations by utility companies prior to beginning the field work.Utility coordination will be done by an engineering technician. Drilling access permits and property cleara nces,if applicable,may be required fo r performing the geotechnical borings.Th e boring pro gra m will be discussed with and approved by the pro ject manager prior to beginning the field w ork and determine the appro priate course of action.Wh en required,GCES performs field explora tions with strict adherence to the Maintenance of Traffic {M OT),rules,regulations,and standar d practices. Based on the field data co llected and the laboratory test results, an engineering report will be prepar ed which summarizes the field and laboratory data genera ted and subsurface soil/ gro undw aterconditionsencountered.Design recommendations, genera l construction considera tions,and discussion of any special construction considera tions will be presented in the report. Th e project w ill be supported by GCES's full-service field and laboratory testing depar tment including experienced staff of technicians and inspectors who hold a var iety of certifications, including those available through the Florida Department of Transportation's (FDO T's)Construction Training Qualification Progra m.All work performed by our team will be controlled by a comprehensive internal Q uality Assura nce/Q uality Control manual and would be tailored to meet and exceed the minimum testing standards set by the Department.At every level,we employ standardized reporting methods,review process and o w«n o»+II:EI8 $RI:$YU#SAMII;IJ LJ'JI SIU-III} 3 9 ±I r0y 2v 2 4 -2 3 4 ) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J BCC CURRENTLY HOLDS FOOT STRUCTURES MAINTENANCE/ REHABILITATION CONTRACTS IN DISTRICTS 1 AND 3 AND HAS HELD THE FOOT DISTRICT 6 BRIDGE REHABILITATION PLANS PREPARATION CONTRACT FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE 5-YEAR CYCLES. standardized report formats,so that erro rs,if any,ar e minimized. Th e G C ES co nstruction services gro up is also available to provide com plete support during construction by pro viding sheet pile,and prestressed concrete piles monitoring services,and certified field-testing technicians to test item s like the soil density,co ncrete strength,and steel w elding quality.Field reports ar e prepar ed fo r the construction manager,describing the field and laboratory test results. 3.1.5 COASTAL ENGINEERING: Th e three primar y com ponents of seaw all Coastal Engineering involve Struct ural,Coastal Hydraulics,and G eotechnical aspect s.Regarding Structura l,South Florida coastal locations involve specific seaw all failure mechanisms unique to the ar ea.For example,scour effect s ca n increase the unsupported height of seaw alls beyond the height fo r w hich they w ere originally designed.Additionally,the corro sive effect of chlorides accelerates deteriora tion,particularly in the "splash zone"w hich typically is subject to the largest bending moment effect.As a result,the focus of analyzing the struct ura l aspect is to consider anticipated hydra ulic loading (scour,w ave effects,surge/overtopping)and confirm struct ura l integrity and resiliency in the long term . BCC has held continuing service 5-year FD O T Structure M aintenance/Rehabilitation contract s fo r over a decade. In that regard our coastal engineering experience has ranged from the Panhandle to Ta mpa Bay dow n thro ugh the Keys. M ost Recently,BC C w as engaged im m ediately fo llow ing the landfa ll of Hurricane Ian in Fort M yers.Th rough BC C's D 1 DW Struct ures contra ct,BC C supported the reconstruction of the Sanibel Causew ay w hich involved thousands of feet of seaw all on both sides of the roadw ay.For that assignment, BC C functioned as "O w ner's Representative,"pro viding oversight and Plans Review services to ensure structura l integrity and FOO T compliance.Exam ples of recom m endations w e have provided have included performing G PR to confirm existing seaw all em bedm ent,structura l analysis to determ ine tolera ble em bedment and section loss,spall and crack repairs, ra ising seaw all heights to acco unt fo r SLR,use of innovative m ethods such as Car bon Fiber Reinfo rced Polymer and Cathodic Pro tection,selecting new seaw all type/material M IA M I BEA C H (i.e.concrete,steel sheeting,pile/panel,sheet pile)optimal for the location,and the design of both cantilever and tie- back seaw alls to provide the required level of resiliency. Regar ding Coastal Hydra ulics,the focus is to model the region in order to accura tely predict scour,w ave effects,and surge, and w ork w ith the structural engineers to identify the failure mechanisms of the original seaw alls,develop the design of new seaw alls or repairs,and design any pro tection required at the seaw all toe,above the seaw all,or at bridge abutments or other seaw alls that may flank the ends of City ow ned seaw alls. IN TERA's seaw all w ork has encompassed much of the State of Florida,w ith the majority of the w ork supporting the protection of tra nsportation infrastructure.Recently on the east coast,IN TERA w as part of a multidisciplinary and intera gency strike fo rce to identify vulnera ble sections of Volusia and Flagler County roadw ay,develop alternatives to address the erosion long-term, and solicit public opinion on the pro ject.Recommendations included a secant w all along tw o sections of the roadw ay combined w ith dune restoration and beach nourishment. IN TERA is currently w orking w ith the design build team for the seaw all sections supporting the design thro ugh ca lculation of dune ero sion and toe scour as w ell as assisting w ith the permit application pro cess.Another pro ject perfo rmed for Florida Department of Tra nsportation District 7 involved evaluation of more than tw o miles of seaw all along the south side of the How ar d Fra nkland Bridge causew ay in Ta m pa,FL.Follow ing the heightened concern of w ave induced damage to seaw alls associated w ith the Hurricane Ian landfall,the District requested evaluation of the seaw alls exposed to w aves w ithin Ta mpa Bay to the south of 1-275.IN TERA personnel perfo rmed a site investigation of the seaw all and recommended performing GPR to determine the embedment depths of the sheet pile (as no as- built info rmation w as located).Additionally,IN TERA designed toe pro tect ion fo r the w alls as w ell as a splash apron to prevent loss of fill material above the w alls in the un-asphalted areas. 0o «no«oar ±UIIEERIIJ SE±DIV:BJ YU#$LI)AIL5 AII)LI'JISt J 30±1toy 2v24-234-3/ TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J bc Regarding G eotechnica l,our appro ach w ill include providing support fo r the Structura l Engineer (soil pro perties for the seaw all analysis)and the Coastal Hydraulics Engineer (soil/ gra in size/composition info rmation for use in the scour analysis).W e w ill first review all existing soils and foundations, info rm ation including exiting foundation plans,as well as printed litera ture including USDA Soil Survey,USGS Q uadra ngle maps and any existing geotechnica l information. W e w ill then supplement this data w ith additional explorations and labora tory testing progra ms,w hich will be used for performing geotechnical engineering analysis to provide recom mendations for the seaw all structures.O ne of GCES's ar eas of specialization is geotechnical support services for South Florida County and M unicipal pro jects in M iami-Dade, including the City of M iami Beach.W e are very fa miliar with the specific soil,ro ck,groundw ater co nditions in South Florida pro viding recommendations on the most cost-effective foundation options for new and rehabilitated structures, including seaw alls.Additionally,G C ES's construction services gro up has also pro vided support during construction by pro viding sheet pile,and prestressed concrete piles monitor ing services,and certified field-testing technicians to test items like the soil density,concrete strength,and steel welding quality. Field reports ar e prepar ed for the co nstruction manager, describing the field and labora tory test results.In this way,the BCC Team provides a comprehensive approach to Coastal Engineering for this project. 3.1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: Biological assessm ents of existing seaw alls must be co nducted to docum ent pro tected natural resources including stony and soft cora ls,seagra sses,and other pro tected species.Q ualified biologists perform benthic surveys to document these protected resources and this info rmation can be used to develop avoidance and minimization measures associated with seaw all replacem ent,aid in project design and permit applications. Permitting is vital to Structura l pro jects.Even a pro ject as simplified as a seaw all rehabilitation job can present issues if the enviro nmental permitting is not prioritized and addressed up front. M iller Legg brings j enviro nmental expertise to the team w ith extensive environmental resource and permitting experience, w etland/mar ine assessment and mitigation experience, Staff alon Seawall M IAM I BEACH listed species experience,environmental assessment and remediation experience and overall knowledge of ecology and surface and gro undwater hydrology within South Florida. M iller Legg has extensive experience with permitting coastal, wetland and in-water projects at local,state and federal levels. W e also have performed environmental support work for Design and Permitting of major transportation improvement pro jects in FOOT District 6 that are directly relevant to this City of M iami Beach Seawall project. Replacing a seawall in Miami-Dade County involves engagement with key regulator y bodies such as the South Florida W ater M anagement District (SFW M D),the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),and Miami-Dade County Environmental Resources Management (DERM ).Environmental regulatory agencies are particularly concerned about impacts on coastal ecosystems,disturbance to protected species habitats like seagrass beds and co ral reefs and maintaining water quality standards during construction.Addressing these concerns necessitates thorough environmental assessments and surveys to identify sensitive habitats and species. Essential permits include the Enviro nmental Resource Permit (ERP)from SFW M D,programmatic biological opinion (JaxBo) from USACE,and a M iami-Dade County Class I Permit from DERM .A SFW M D ERP is required for development or construction activities to prevent flooding,protect the water quality of Florida's lakes and streams from stormwater pollution, and protect wetlands and other surface waters.Section 24-48 of the M iami-Dade County Code requires that a Miami-Dade County Class I Permit be obtained prior to performing any work in,on,over or upon tidal waters or coastal wetlands of Miami- Dade County or of any of the municipalities located within M iami-Dade County.A Class I Permit is utilized to manage impacts from construction on coastal wetlands and tidal waters. Th rough the Class I Permit Application pro cess,proposed pro jects ar e reviewed to identify potential enviro nmental and other impacts.Before the permit is issued,Miami-Dade County may require modification of the pro ject to eliminate avoidable impacts and to minimize other impacts.Compensation (mitigation)is required for unavoidable impacts as par t of the permit.M itigation plans are then developed to minimize enviro nmental impacts,including erosion control measures and habitat restoration efforts. In the permit application process,early engagement with agencies,comprehensive documentation,and proactive response to feedback are prioritized to streamline approvals. Permit acquisition timelines typically range from 6 to 18 months, o ooa ENI0IIEEE3II)±II3 1JlZJ!II3 MIU IJJIIJ SILIS 39!1In »3 9 2 4 -2 3 4 -3)9 TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J be w ith var iation depending on the agency and specific project circum stances.Surveys fo r seagra ss,cora ls,and other sensitive habitats ar e conducted meticulously by qualified biological experts using appro priate methodologies,w ith findings integra ted into project planning and m itigation stra tegies. By adhering to regulatory requirem ents and engaging stakeholders effectively,proponents can ensure a smooth seaw all replacem ent pro cess in M iami-Dade County w hile minim izing enviro nm ental im pacts. A recent,relevant project M iller Legg is currently handling is the City of M iam i Beach Seaw all 48th Street Cora l Reloca tion. For this project,M iller Legg is tem porarily relocating corals during N Bay Road and 48th Street End Seaw all pro ject . O nce construction is co m plete,and the turbidity curtains are removed,the biologists w ill survey the new ripra p to determine a location that w ill afford the coral the best chance for stability and long-term survival. Th e coral w ill be placed w ithin the ripra p so that its orientation and depth ar e compara ble w ith its original position.A post relocation report w ill be com pleted,including a site plan that identifies the relocated cora l,pre-and post-locations of the cora l,and the anticipated survivability.In addition,M iller Legg w ill prepar e a one w eek,one month and six months post relocation coral monitoring reports.Per the DERM Class I Construction Permit (C Ll-2022-0004),in order to avoid im pacts,2 stony corals loca ted at the footprint of the pro posed w ork at 50 LF from the north pro perty line shall be tem porarily relocated to an area of similar light and depth. "e~ . -~•.•T 5#ft 48"Street at N.Bay Road and Flamingo Drive at 29 Street Survey 3.1.7 RISK ASSESSMENT &MITIGATION: O ur approach to risk assessm ent and m itigation is methodical and simple.In fact,w e have already perfo rmed a risk assessment for this pro ject.O ur risk assessment appro ach is based on the FD O T's "Risk Based G raded Appro ach Analysis"w hich assigns point values to "risk assessment"and "priority"item s in order to identify ar eas of focus at the onset of the job.Based on our experience designing and construct ing seaw alls in the City of M IAM I BEA C H M iami Beach,w e took the FD O T risk analysis and customized it to evaluate risk specifically fo r City of M iami Beach seaw all pro jects.Th e below table provides a genera l risk assessment for seaw all projects in the City of M iami Beach.For example,w e know that,in genera l,items such as Utilities,Enviro nmental,and Constructability w ill need to be considered early on in a project in order to avoid unnecessar y delays dow n the line.Th ese item s appear in the below analysis as "5 by 5's"indicating that they ar e high risk and require attentiveness from the onset of the contra ct.Th erefore,our first step to mitigating these risks w as to right-staff the team w ith BC C personnel and specialty subconsultants w ho can address these risk items.BC C's utility coordinator,Rick Dura n,is intimately fa miliar w ith City of M iami Beach utilities,having handled utility co ordination for pro jects such as the Julia Tuttle Causew ay and City of M iami Beach ITS and Sm ar t Par king Design-Build.Similar ly,Environmental Perm itting w ill be handled by M iller Legg,w hose recent City of M iam i Beach seaw all experience includes the Seaw all 48th Street Cora l Relocation.And to address constructability,BC C's CEI arm provides constructability review s prior to every phase submittal.Tying all this together is BC C's PM ,Christian Aquino, w ho begins utility coordination and permitting at the 30%plans phase,establishing deadlines and tra cking progress. FOOT "RISK BASED GRADED APPROACH ANALYSIS" ;CITY OF MIAMI BEACH SEAWALLS -GENERAL%$.as ITEM RISK ELEMENT RISK TOTALASSESSMENTPRIORITY 1 I Utilities 5 5 25] 2 Pro ject Schedule 2 3 6 3 Coordination 3 3 9 4 I Environmental 5 5 25] 5 Right-of-W ay Involvement 3 3 9 6 Contamination 2 3 6 7 Regulatory Involvement 3 3 9 8 M aterial Availability 1 1 9 Experience /Capability 3 3 10 Political Visibility 3 3 9 11 Public Involvement 3 2 6 12 Safety 3 3 13 [C onstruction_/_M O T 5 5 25 I 14 M aintenance 3 3 15 Port/Security 3 3 Risk Score =0.90 Low Risk Risk Score =91-150 Medium Risk Risk Score>150 High Risk «roaa ±II )IEE#EI )IVE;JJIIIJ MIU III)SELIE; Jo !I r )3924-234-3)) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J be enogir enng For each specific pro ject,BC C w ill simply update the above matrix in order to identify w hich risk items ar e "5 by 5's"for that specific pro ject.For example,seaw alls near the Port may elevate Item 15 to a "5 x 5".O r seaw alls in the Star Island ar ea may elevate ltem ll to a"5 by 5"status.Then,BCC w ill take the sam e appro ach as that taken to address genera l risk,and right-staff the pro ject and monitor pro gress to ensure that risk is pro perly m itigated.N otably,this does not absolve the team from monitoring universally important risk items,such as safety regulations and standards.If the risk item is in the matrix,but received a low er score,it is still im portant and w ill be monitored along w ith all of the other risk item s. 3.1.8 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION &REPORTING: "engineering,"the aspect of "documentation and reporting"touches all aspects of a pro ject. Th erefore,documentation is vital to keeping a project organized, moving fo rw ard,and completed in the best interest of all stakeholders. M oreover,w ith respect to seaw alls, the City maintains ow nership and maintenance responsibility for the seaw all in perpetuity,long after design and construction is com plete."Pro per docum entation and a comprehensive pro ject file pro vide invaluable resources fo r future reference throughout the lifespan of the seaw all.O ne thing that our extensive Florida structure maintenance and rehabilitation experience has taught us is w hen it com es to assessing an existing structure, there can never be "too much"documentation w hen it comes to considering a structure's history w hen addressing conditions and deficiencies.For these reasons,BC C has established mechanism s to ensure proper documentation and reporting thro ughout the project.Pro ject documentation includes pro duct ion and delivera bles,schedule,and financial as w ell as correspondence,design decisions,and miscellaneous adm inistrative.Th e follow ing sum mar izes our comprehensive approach to pro ject docum entation and reporting,from the pro ject onset through Post Design Services. Pro je ct S e tu p At the onset of a pro ject,a project folder w ith a regimented arra ngement of subfolders is created on the BC C N etw ork fo r the purposes of filing project documents and files in an orderly and intuitive manner,ranging from existing as-built info rmation and historic data to field review /inspection photogra phs, M IA M I BEAC H to enviro nmental and utility information,to schedule,to deliverables/submittals,to administrative.After BCC dra fts the Scope of Services and Staff Hour Estimate (Fee Proposal)for City review,updated versions of each are saved to the project file w ith o"..V 2"or"..3 "naming convention to document the negotiations pro cess.Th e file name for the final version uses "...FIN AL"and the date.O nce the W ork Order is issued,BCC provides the final versions with a completed "Ta sk Setup"matrix to BCC Finance to set up the project number for BCC billing and tracking purposes,as well as to document the involvement of any subco nsultants.Although this step is in large par t internal to BCC,it is indicative of our commitment to project documentation, and the impor tance of establishing co mplete records from the start.As another example,the project schedule is prepared, and updates tracked and filed using the same "..V #"naming system.In this way,the project setup initiates an orderly flow of documentation that extends thro ughout the life of the project. :/1t 798 Sout Pointe Drive Site Inspect io n O ur Team utilizes a prepar ed inspection field book to organize and collect field data to ensure a comprehensive inspection and document the conditions observed.Th is field book will include checklists that are required to be filled out prior to leaving the site to ensure all data is collected and avoid the need for return visits.O ne innovative aspect our above-water team has found effective is to prepar e an electronic inspection report document using a laptop containing the inspection report spreadsheet template to populate the inspection report in real time as the inspection progresses.Th is includes conditions,as well as deficiency dimensions and repair limits used to calculate repair quantities and construction costs.In this w ay,the inspection report documentation is gathered,completed,and put to the pro ject file for future reference.After the inspection,a Technical Memora ndum is prepar ed summarizing the inspection findings Along w ith «rao@+±IIIEEE»U $II3 JI III8J II)LIIIIJ SI1II; 30!I+!rIy ±924·234-3)9 TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J bc and recom mendations for City review and concurrence.Th is step further documents the direction of the project.At this time, any significant pro ject changes are identified and discussed w ith the City to confirm the correct path moving forw ar d. Coordination Early pro ject coordination includes key documentation aspects such as utility coordination,environmental permitting, cultura l resources,and public involvement. For Utility Coordination,w e prepare a utility matrix of all Utility Agency O w ners identifying facility type and size,orientation,and location,and contact inform ation.All documentation forw ar ded to,and received from ,utility ow ners is put to the pro ject file.Similar ly, Environmental Agency perm it application information,permit sketches,and correspondence is captured and filed for future reference.Any com m itm ents made to the public ar e also filed to establish a history of comm unication and ensure that the pro ject com plies w ith the goals and commitments established from the beginning. Production Design,CADD,Specifica tions, and Reports ar e filed in their respective subfo lders,w ith pdf's created and dated at key milestones,such as the Q uality Contro l stage prior to phase submittals.Q uality Contro l prints ar e either created electronically or har d copies scanned and filed to document the pro cess.Each docum ent also has a "W orking File" subfolder that contains the w orking (seed)file for reference. A "Delivera bles"subfolder documents all material submitted to the City by the date,and can include Plans,Specifica tions, Calculations,Forms,M emora ndums,Reports,Cost Estimates, Schedules,and M iscellaneous Documentation.In this w ay, there is a living file alw ays up to date w ith w hatever was pro duced and submitted at any stage during the production effort.Phase review documentation includes providing w ritten responses to City comments on the Plan mar kups as w ell as using a Comm ent-Response W ord document that captures notes from the discussion at the phase review meeting.Th e phase review pro cess is one opportunity for pro ject changes,since depending on the Plan Review er or source of the comment,scope changes can be introduced.W e take a methodica l appro ach to M IAM I BEA C H documenting this occurrence thro ugh the comment-response documentation process.Specifically,the co mment is discussed w ith the City along with potential solutions,design and construction costs,and recommendations so that the City can make an info rmed decision and the project change documented appropriately and using the proper decision-making channels. Management Documentation centers ar ound correspondence such as telephone conversations,emails,and meetings.W e take a disciplined appro ach to documenting correspondence.All project emails ar e filed in an O utlook folder created fo r each project to document w hat was received and when.Discussion/ meeting minutes and notes are taken and distributed to all participants immediately afterw ards for review and any needed edits.The key to this step is to not overly complicate the process. To ols such as M icrosoft W ord Dictate and Teams Transcription are helpful,how ever we find that the BCC Project M anager still needs to filter the info rmation fo r accuracy and key points. Discussion attendees are identified up front,and the key points of the discussion noted along with Action Items,due dates,and any follow up.This approach is especially useful for occa sions when the City PM,due to busy schedule or urgent matters,is conflicted from participating in a meeting or discussion.In these ca ses,should the City PM indicate that the meeting is to proceed without them,detailed meeting notes enable updating the City PM and providing a means fo r the City PM to pro vide valuable input and feedback on the discussion. O n more than one occasion,this has enabled BCC and the City to jointly avoid matters of scope changes and scope creep by proactively identifying the source of the potential change and working to correct it befo re it adversely affects the project. O n the administrative side,documentation and reporting includes invoices submitted monthly along with a Payout Curve and a Progress Report that identifies activities,milestones, upcoming deadlines,financial and schedule information,and compares the "%Complete"with the "%Budget Expended" to ensure progress is steadily tracked from all standpoints. Post Design From the Engineer of Record standpoint,documenting conversations and meetings is particularly important during Do «rs»a ±IIIIEEEII9 IVE;JI;III3S II)III)IJ 3IE.LIS 39 !1 t r y 294-234-3)) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.) bcengioering Post Design to clear ly docum ent w hat w as discussed and by w hom,and w hat actions w ere taken to keep construction pro gressing.Site inspection documentation identifies participants,the purpose fo r the inspection,the co nditions observed,and action item s and dates to be delivered. 3.1.9 MAINTENANCE &REHABILITATION: Th e prepara tion of technica lly sound,high-quality,structura l maintenance and rehabilitation Plans and Specifications is another of BC C's strengths. In the past l O year s alone,BC C has completed 77 major maintenance and rehabilitation projects involving coastal Florida bridges and seaw alls.Experience is paramount w hen it comes to struct ure maintenance and rehabilitation.BCC staff has been involved w ith Florida structure maintenance and rehabilitation for over 4 decades.O ne byproduct of that w hich w ill apply direct ly to this City of M iami Beach contract is our act ive contracts keep us in constant communication w ith FDO T structure maintenance and materials staff at the highest levels in the State.In this w ay,BC C is alw ays at the cutting edge of structure rehabilitation,methods,applications, ideas,technologies,and real-tim e lessons learned that can be imm ediately applied to this City of M iami Beach seaw all contra ct. In this w ay,coastal Florida structure maintenance and rehabilitation is a niche industry in w hich BC C has a firm foothold.M aintenance and Rehab w ork is unique in that there is no "one size fits all"repair.Rather,repairs must be customized to fit each specific application.Th e devil is in the details,and Engineering pra cticality and technica l expertise m ust be applied in equal measures.Project plans must clear ly outline the w ork to be done but not dictate Contractor M eans and M ethods unless the situation demands a specific approach to ensure safety or quality.M aintenance and Rehabilitation project s follow a defined pro cess from concept to completion that requires specific and tim ely actions on the par t of the design team in order to deliver the pro ject on schedule. Th e key aspects that distinguish structura l maintenance and rehabilitation pro jects from normal pro jects include: •W orking w ithin the constra ints of existing conditions •Enhanced field review s and inspections in the absence of existing plan info rmation •Recognizing signs of deficiencies not visible to the naked eye,such as incipient spoils or previous repairs that can co nceal the true level of deteriora tion •W orking w ithin a fixed,pre-established co nstruction M IAM I BEA C H budget. •Addressing the ro ot cause of the deficiency (not providing just a "Band-Aid"repair). •Completing quality repairs that provide the required longevity. •Completing repairs with minimal disruption and impacts. •Maximizing the remaining service life,or if the structure is planned for replacement,prioritize repairs to get to the replacement year at minimal cost. •Providing clean,constructible designs and easy-to- understand plans and specifications. •Avoiding cost overruns,such as ensuring concrete repair quantities acco unt fo r the required repair volume exceeding the size of the deficiency measured in the field, and additional deterioration from the time of the initial inspection to the time actual construction takes place. •Maintenance and rehabilitation projects require enhanced attentiveness during construction.Contractors aggressively bid maintenance and repair jobs with the intent to submit claims and recognize overruns - Contra ctors are especially motivated for relatively small jobs such as seaw alls where successful claims can have a more direct impact on the Contractor'pro fit. Determining the appro priate repair solution hinges on identifying the ro ot cause of the deterioration or deficiency.Understanding the site-specific conditions,wall orientation,ground conditions (loss of fill behind walls),the results of hammer soundings during inspections,and taking note of the type and importance of pro perties and facilities supported by the wall ar e all key in this determination. O ur Team has extensive experience not only evaluating existing walls that have deteriorated but also experience designing and constructing seaw alls through many of our Design-Build contracts.Know ing what it takes to build these walls is also important w hen determining optimal repairs and the viability of constructability aspects such as in-place repairs vs.the need for tempora ry shoring and support.Issues affecting construction ar e things like shallow water,limited access,presence of utilities or submerged resources,and har d soil pro files. Typical concrete repair details include spoil repairs (shall and deep with exposed rebar ), pile jackets,and epoxy injection &sealing of Concrete Repairs «osoc+±IEE±RIIJ3II±J HJ:III1J MIU 1II)IJ SLUE3 3!I+Arr0y 3924-234-3)) b ngineereg TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.) cra cks.Innovative repair ideas our Team has to further increase the possibility fo r repair over replacement of existing seaw alls are: ►Post-Installed Dra inage W eep Holes (relieve pore water pressure behind w alls) ►Cathodic Protection System s (C orro sion Inhibitor) ►Use of G lass Fiber and Basalt Rebar (less costly than car bon fiber rebar ) ►Zinc M esh Act ivating M ortar Cathodic Pro tection. ►Solar pow ered impressed current Cathodic Pro tection systems. Below ,w e have outlined the 10 steps of a typical seaw all maintenance and rehabilitation project.0 Scoping.Senior structures staff experienced w ith repair and rehabilitation w ork review available data and prepar e the scope and fee estim ate. Using senior staff is im pera tive to firm up the scope from the beginning and avoid unnecessar y Supplem ental fee requests w hich can delay the design schedule and bring unw anted scrutiny on the City Pro ject M anager.0 Negotiations.Update the design Team per Step (1)and com pile the SH E.Com plete negotiations w ithin l w eek Receive N otice to Pro ceed.Com plete sub consultant A greem ents.Disciplines finalize their Staff Hour Estimate (SH E),providing detailed com m ents and backup.0 Pro;ect Kickoff.All disciplines and specialists involved. Submit schedule.Also subm it our Q uality Contro l Plan that is fine-tuned for rehab w ork,such as requiring a plans-in-hand field review at 90 %completion.Factors co nfirmed up front include criteria,third-par ty involvement,permits,need for permitting sketc hes,constructability.Keep City PM in the loop moving forw ar d.0 Inspection and Assessment.Th e basis for the Plans. Prepar e sketches to aid the Field Review .Experienced staff and specialists.Review all available information.Schedule and co m plete inspections.It is im portant to use data such as inspection reports or repair history as a guide but perform a thoro ugh inspection from the "Engineer of Recor d"perspective. Inspect ions include above and below w ater and inspectors M IAM I BEA C H look for signs of global and localized distress.Anything affecting safety is red flagged fo r immediate attention.Another benefit of the Engineer of Record performing inspections is pro spective repairs are added to the inspection notes at that time,facilitating plan development and promoting repair effectiveness.O ur Engineers also coordinate with the City to confirm the ca pabilities of City Maintenance crews to address routine maintenance such as localized sand cement bag shoring,vegetation removal,or minor gro ut troweling to pro tect against fill leakage,vs.repairs that require more specialized Contractor work and therefore require advertising a repair pro ject.0 Inspection/Assessment Memo.Document inspection findings and provide to City PM in order to confirm scope and the recommended repairs and upgrades.Each recommendation is accompanied by a photogra ph,description of the co ndition,and genera l type/scope of repair.Th e same goes fo r recommendations of inaction. For example,in some cases,minor deficiencies do not war rant repair due to factors such as redundancy of the structura l system or the structura l importance of the member does not justify using intrusive methods to address.Such cases are also documented in the memo to provide documentation for why design decisions were made for future reference and enable the City to make informed decisions moving fo rwar d.9 Plans Production.Seaw all rehabilitation projects ar e relatively stra ightforw ar d and do not require an abundance of phase submittals.Typically,repair projects follow a 60%/90%/l 00%Submittal Schedule.Customizing our librar y of typical/co mmon repair details to be pro ject-specific minimizes effort and reduced schedule.Repair projects typica lly do not impact utilities and involve simplified permitting,however it is still important to begin the utility coordination as well as the permitting pro cess with DERM ,Army Corps,etc.immediately to avoid unnecessar y delays dow n the line.W e also like to bring the "60%Submittal"up to "90%Submittal"level of detail and completion.Th is makes fo r a higher quality project and,for example,makes for more detailed feedback resulting from Public W orks phase review s. W hen developing seaw all repairs,we focus on using engineering judgment to maintain safety and minimize tg WHEN DEVELOPING+1±Rs%»ENGINEERING JUDGMENTTOMAINTAINSAFETYANDMINIMIZEDISRUPTION..'"- o woo ±IIEE:II9 EI3 HJ)3I.II3 AIU III)3 LI3 3 !Into»3024-234 )be TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY lCONT.J disruption.For example,repairs ar e completed "in-place"to restore any section loss.W e also consider the type of wall and structura l system.For example,tie-back walls require special care in the ar ea of the tie-back,tie-cap connection in order to maintain stru ctura l integrity and stability.To mitigate this,Plans include restricting live load to areas aw ay from the portion of w all being repaired.Also,the Plans specify the pro gression of w ork and detail the sequence of repairs in order to ensure that safety is maintained and avoid the need for extensive temporary support/shoring measures,w hich could increase impacts to the enviro nm ent.Specific Plan language is used in order to enable the Contractor to complete the job within the required fram ew ork,but also not be overly restrictive regar ding M eans and M ethods.Given the large fluctuation in repair material unit costs,such as spall repairs,w e also confirm cost escalation and provide interim quantity/cost updates as needed.Along with BC C's ow n database of rehabilitation project unit costs,we use our access to FDO T resources,such as prior District 6 pro ject Direct ServicesbidresultsandFDOTHighwayConstructionMaterialStudiesto capture local effect s and co st escalation.►G raphics/Rendering Services.BC C's Graphics teamAspecializesinpreparinginfrastructuregraphicsdepictingVQualityControl.All rehabilitation work pro ducts {plans,existing,interim,and final conditions that are extremely mem os,specifications,estimates,technical special effective at conveying the project purpose and need,as provisions,etc.)w ill be prepared in acco rdance with a well as the pro ject vision,to key stakeholders.Often times docum entable Q uality Contro l (Q C)Plan that assures after a pro ject is completed,actual photos are co mpar ed to accountability,accura cy,completeness,legibility,application previous renderings,and it is difficult to distinguish "the real of appropriate design criteria,and good engineering practice.thing"from the rendering;an example is shown below. It is important to note that w hile there is genera l guidance and ,-~ successful repair details,there is no "Standard"w hen it comes to maintenance and repairs.Repair details must be customized for the specific pro ject and application.Th is places added emphasis on the im portance of Q uality Control for maintenance and rehabilitation pro jects.It is important to recognize that the purpose of City phase review s is not to provide Q uality Control for BCC's w or k product.BC C w ill prepar e a contract specific Q uality M anagem ent Plan (Q M P)that addresses the specific review pro cess for each type of document and assigns specific review ers experienced in rehabilitation w ork to each task.0 Plans Reviews.W e provide the City with a plan set PDF at each phase,and Public W orks review s internally and provides com ments in the form of plan mar kups.So we pro vide w ritten responses and return them to the City to confirm that the City is satisfied w ith how w e propose that review comments and mar kups be addressed in the Plans.W e also ensure phase review com m ent close out by incorporating a backcheck of City com m ents/mar kups into the Q uality Control pro cess. G Advertisement.Review Pre-Bid questions and draft Pre- Bid responses for City concurrence ASAP.Th is is par ticular ly important for rehabilitation projects that involve many unique aspects different than a "typical"infrastructure project. G)Post Design Services.Review Materials Submittals and conduct Field Reviews as needed.Acknowledge RFl's immediately and respond/resolve within l day.We attend the PreCon M eeting,emphasizing any key aspects of the project. O ur role is support,bringing expertise to the table to support construction and keep the project on schedule. 3.1.10 OTHER VALUE-ADDED SERVICES: The value-added services that the BCC Team provides range from direct services to the "intangibles"that make a project truly successful. M IAM I BEAC H o «no »«E,I)III:EII)SE)IIE;HJ SIAS I)LI)III)l/ELIE3 19±1fry 9 2 4-334-34) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.J engineerng p Drone Pilot Services.BC C 's ,,sa FA A -certified drone pilots ar e --..!.'r •r--... available to deploy to any location r-7:' in the City to pick up footage involving •f seaw alls or any other City interest.Airport pro xim ity may require advance notice in some ca ses to acquire FAA appro val.How ever,in most cases we can be on site picking up data w ithin a day from the request. ►Design-Build Experience.BCC has gained valuable construct ion experience completing over $6.2 Billion of FDOT Design-Build projects.Th is extensive experience w ill benefit the City of M iami Beach,since BC C w ill be draw ing from our field experience and fa miliarity w ith ongoing construction methods to provide cost effective solutions that minimize risk and avoid claim s.In this w ay,w e have found that our Design-Build experience has tra nslated extremely w ell to conventional projects such as seaw all replacement and rehabilitation. A nother positive bypro duct of Design-Build work is it requires a relatively large number of structura l resources to pursue and deliver.As a result,Design-Build success has burgeoned BCC's Florida stru ct ures gro up to 50 stro ng (29 PE's),all with Florida coastal structure design and repair experience,and including experience firm ly grounded in South Florida. ►In-House Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) Services.BCC's in-house CEI ar m pro vides vast resources in the construct ion pro jects involving replacement and re pair of coas tal structures.Th is is not only a value-added feature for construct ion support,but during the design phase when,as M IAM I BEACH par t of the Q uality Control Process,the CEI team provides Constructability Reviews on the Plans and Specifica tions. Grant Application Support. BCC offers services in the area of capturing funding sources for municipal projects.Recent grantNe.aol canon exer ience includes "Vision Zero "pro grams for the City of Coral Springs and MiamiVISION±.:Z E R0 For the DTPW assignment,BCC,S Ide rearoo of a alano to request federa l funds from the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) G ra nt Progra m to fund the implementation of a portion of the To p 10 0 locations for implementation within Miami-Dade County.W e find that an important aspect of gra nt applications is to "tell the story"behind the application that makes the submittal meaningful and compelling.In addition,in our role as a Consultant with FDOT providing oversight to the Miami-Dade TPO,BCC has helped coordinate the periodic reporting of existing gra nts such as the W alkSafe Progra m managed by the University of M iami as well as gra nts for municipal planning studies administered through the Transportation Alternatives Progra m.W e ar e therefore familiar with the reporting requirements of gra nts and will be able to ensure that the City remains compliant with any grants that will be received. Th e true mark of this experience is not the number of applications submitted,rather,the result of the applications. Below are a few recent examples of our grant work: ►Road to Zero Grant:M iami-Dade County DTPW received a gra nt of $150,000 from the National Safety County to develop a Vision Zero Dashboard and conduct a Local Community Liaison Pilot Project. ►Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant:M iami-Dade County DTPW received an HSIP Federa l gra nt to fund 3 Vision Zero Implementation Projects. ►Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)Grant:Miami- Dade County DTPW received a Federa l grant for $16.2 Million Dollars to fund at 24 Vision Zero safety projects and additional safety planning activities. We look forward to helping the City of Miami Beach in the same way! MIAMI-DADE COUNTY oooc+±II]IEEE3II9 8E.II,3 1JI ALIE3 JI)LI)I SE:LILI} 39±It!ft4 924-234-31) TAB 3 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (CONT.) be3ineerng ►GIS.G IS is an ar ea w here our Team excels and has the experience to deliver a pro duct that is comprehensive and easy for all to use.As par t of BC C's City of Fort Lauderdale Seaw all M aster Plan project,w e provided comprehensive G IS services. For this contra ct,our Team w ould create a geodatabase of all municipal seaw alls,beginning w ith existing information available to-date.Th e geodatabase w ill contain all the relevant seaw all info rmation and be easily sear ched and cataloged for necessar y.M aintenance,monitoring of life expectancy and any repairs that may be needed.The database w ill hold critical info rmation about each seaw all,including repair plans,costs, funding sources,resiliency needs and condition assessment ratings.Th is can be coupled w ith general information about each structure,from geogra phic location,size,type of construction,and even dro ne imagery of each structure to docum ent current condition,in case of any catastrophic event, the condition w ill be w ell documented. A ny maintenance reports and inspections w ill also be ca taloged in the database,to assist in tracking current conditions.Th e database w ill be completely sear chable by selecting the structure on the map.Th e info rm ation in the geodatabase w ill have the capability to be converted to G oogle Ear th ".kml"files,so field inspect ors could use Google Ear th to pull any information about a bridge in the field,on a tablet or other portable device.The database w ill also be made into a w eb application that allow s sear ches,by not only the seaw all nam e,but any of the tra cked asset info rmation, again allow ing the client to better budget and track needed impro vements. O ur Team feels that this approach w ill serve the project well but can still be tailored to meet any adjustments the City may w ant.Th e information in the geodatabase w ill match the seaw all assessm ent system and naming convention established as par t of the project.It can include the information from the condition of seaw alls from the field evaluations,elevations, boundar ies of the seaw alls,stakeholder information and any additional information that City staff w ould like to include. ►Qualifications.BC C's services include the co mplete pro ject cycle from concept to design to construction to maintenance. C C holds FD O T Q ualifica tions ra nging from PD&E Studies to Roadw ay Design,all Structures W ork G ro ups thro ugh Concrete MIAMI BEACH Segmental,Inspection,Traffic Engineering,Traffic Operations, CE\,Engineering Contract Administration and Management, and Planning.Therefore,under one roof,BCC is able to support the City in whateverneed may arise thro ugh this seawall contract. "The Intangibles" Th e BCC Team would bring several intangibles to this co ntract. First,building upon experience is critica l to seawall projects, and our Team assembles firms and individuals that have based their car eers on the design and rehabilitation of coastal Florida structures including seawalls.Th at experience extends to include former FD OT staff that held key structural positions locally (FOOT District 6 Structures Design Engineer)to the state level (FOOT Central Office Assistant State Structures Design Engineer).Furthermore,BCC currently holds three FDOT Districtwide Bridge Repair co ntracts,including the FDOT District 6 Bridge Repair/Rehabilitation Plans Prepar ation contract loca l to Miami- Dade County.This would enable BCC to provide the City with a direct, real-time conduit to South Florida coastal structure rehabilitation technology and lessons learned.No other firm submitting for this project can provide such an overwhelming resource of relevant local,regional, and statewide experience. Seco nd,BC C's number one goal with this contract is not just to complete seawall projects.W e want to co ntinue to serve as a trusted advisor to the City and make this seawall contract the "G old Standar d"by which all other City contracts are compared.The key to our approach is our assigned Project M anager,Christian Aquino.Mr.Aquino and his same support staff assigned to this contract,recently delivered this exact same project to the City in the Jefferson Street End Seawall pro ject.As par t of that,Mr.Aquino developed what has become the City's Standar d Seawall Plans.That embodies Mr.Aquino's approach to this seawall contract --he hopes to continue to build upon the solid relationship that he has fostered with the City of Miami Beach over the past several years. Why choose BCC? Lastly,Miami is our home.This is where we live,work,and play.Simply stated,we will take ownership of this contract like no one else can.To us,this contract is personal.We are pro ud to say that.And we would be honored to continue to uphold our shared quality of life thro ugh this co ntract. 4119 Indian Creek Drive «roost EIIEEERIII }III)J24\III$JI)IIISIIIB3 JO!II!n0»±024-234-34) TAB 3 3.2 SUPPLIER DIVERSITY PLAN BCC is com mitted to fostering diversity and inclusion in our contracting practices,striving to meet all regulatory goals.O ur Team includes M anuel G .Vera &Associates,a Disadvantaged,minority-owned business,and M edia Relations Group,a Disadvantaged,and minority/women-owned business.W e actively engage w ith small,disadvantaged and minority businesses. Inclusion is extremely important to us,as w e started as a small,woman-ow ned business ourselves.By prioritizing these enterprises in our procurement policies and providing support,we aim to create a more inclusive and equitable contract ing environment.O ur commitment is further reinfo rced by regular monitoring and transparent reporting of our progress in these efforts. A plan of action would be built around the following principles: •Supplier Diversity Goals:Establish clear,measurable goals fo r contracting with small and minority businesses,women's business enterprises,and firms in labor surplus ar eas. •Outreach and Engagement:Develop strategies to identify and engage with diverse suppliers.Th is can include attending relevant industry conferences,netw orking events,etc. •Capacity Building and Support:Implement pro grams to support the grow th and development of diverse suppliers.Provide resources to help them im pro ve competitiveness,and meet pro curement requirements. •Inclusive Procurement Policies:Ensure that pro curement teams are trained to recognize and address barriers diverse suppliers m ight fa ce. •Monitoring and Reporting:Establish a system for monitoring and reporting on diversity efforts.Track pro gress against diversity goals,assess the effectiveness of outreach,and transparently communicate outcomes. M IA M I BEA C H i 4lard.a,I r engineering GETTING THEREJUSTGOTEASIER' \,-