Resolution 2025-33570 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-33570
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE AND ECONOMIC
RESILIENCY COMMITTEE, AT ITS FEBRUARY 21, 2025 MEETING,
AND DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO PROCEED WITH THE
RESTRIPING AND/OR REPAINTING OF DAMAGED AND/OR FADED
GREEN BICYCLE LANES CITYWIDE, SUBJECT TO A FISCAL YEAR
2024/5 ("FISCAL YEAR 2025") OPERATING BUDGET AMENDMENT
IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF $375,000.
WHEREAS, at the September 11, 2024 City Commission meeting, the City
Commission referred an agenda Item (C4 J), sponsored by Vice Mayor Tanya K. Bhatt
and co-sponsored by Commissioner Laura Dominguez, to the FERC to discuss funding
needs for: 1) various bicycle lane improvements and safety enhancements identified in
the Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan ("BPMP") Projects Implementation Matrix; 2)
restriping and/or repainting green bicycle lanes citywide; 3) drainage improvements
along the Beachwalk to address ponding; 4) potential widening of the Beachwalk at
critical chokepoints; and 5) purchasing solar-powered electronic speed feedback devices
and data collection sensors; and
WHEREAS, at the February 21, 2025 FERC meeting, the Committee discussed
this item and recommended that the Administration proceed with the restriping and/or
repainting of damaged and/or faded green bicycle lanes citywide, subject to a Fiscal
Year("Fr) 2025 operating budget amendment in the approximate amount of$375,000;
and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost of restriping and/or repainting damaged and/or
faded green bicycle lanes citywide is approximately $375,000; and
WHEREAS,funding has not been identified, budgeted or appropriated at this time
in the Transportation and Mobility Department's FY 2025 operating budget; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation and Mobility Department will engage one of the
City's pre-qualified rotational contractors to perform the restriping and/or repainting of
damaged and/or faded green bicycle lanes throughout the City in an expeditious
timeframe, subject to City Commission approval for funding appropriation through a FY
2025 operating budget amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission accept the recommendation of the Finance And Economic Resiliency
Committee, at its February 21, 2025 meeting, directing the Administration to proceed
with the restriping and/or repainting of damaged and/or faded green bicycle lanes
citywide, subject to a Fiscal Year 2024/5 ("Fiscal Year 2025") operating budget
amendment in the approximate amount of$375,000.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 19th day March, 20 5.
ATTEST:
Steven Meiner, Mayor
MAR 2 0 2025
__`_�`\M\NHNIII
Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk ���•••f ,ti,,,,
(sponsored by Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt s UNCORP HATED/
co- sponsored by Commissioner Laura Dominguez) %or,. _ `'`
APPROVED AS TO
FORM &LANGUAGE
&FOR EXECUTION
311712p -
City Attorney �,� • Date
Resolutions - C7 P
MIAMI BEA l�
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
FROM: Eric Carpenter, City Manager
DATE: March 19, 2025
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
FINANCE AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCY COMMITTEE, AT ITS FEBRUARY 21,
2025 MEETING, DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO PROCEED WITH THE
RESTRIPING AND/OR REPAINTING OF DAMAGED AND/OR FADED GREEN
BICYCLE LANES CITYWIDE, SUBJECT TO A FISCAL YEAR 2024/5 ("FISCAL
YEAR 2025") OPERATING BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE APPROXIMATE
AMOUNT OF $375,000.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Administration ("Administration") recommends that the Mayor and City Commission
("City Commission") adopt the Resolution.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
At the July 10, 2024 PSNQLC meeting, the PSNQLC discussed the item (Attachment A)following
a presentation from the Transportation and Mobility Department staff identifying the various
issues, findings, and recommendations from the multi-departmental micromobility safety working
group ("Working Group"), comprised of representatives from various City departments, the
Mayor's Office, and a City of Miami Beach ("City") resident(Attachment B). During the discussion,
the PSNQLC recommended that the Administration move forward with safety striping and the
proposed regulatory signage on the Beachwalk and Lincoln Road, as recommended by the
Working Group. In addition, during public comment, a resident spoke in support of extending the
safety striping and signage through the Cutwalk and Baywalk to 5 Street. The Administration
responded that, provided the current budget allocation is sufficient, the safety improvements
would be extended to the Cutwalk and Baywalk.
•
Furthermore, the PSNQLC recommended to refer this item to the Finance and Economic
Resiliency Committee ("FERC" or "Committee") to discuss funding needs for: 1) bicycle lane
improvements and safety enhancements identified in the Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan (BPMP)
Projects Implementation Matrix; 2) restriping and/or repainting damaged and/or faded green
bicycle lanes citywide; 3) drainage improvements along the Beachwalk to address ponding; 4)
potential widening of the Beachwalk at critical chokepoints; and 5) purchasing solar-powered
electronic speed feedback devices and data collection sensors.
At the September 11, 2024 City Commission meeting, the City Commission referred an agenda
Item (C4 J), sponsored by Vice Mayor Tanya K. Bhatt and co-sponsored by Commissioner Laura
Dominguez, to the FERC to discuss funding needs for: 1) various bicycle lane improvements and
safety enhancements identified in the Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan ("BPMP") Projects
Implementation Matrix; 2) restriping and/or repainting green bicycle lanes citywide; 3) drainage
improvements along the Beachwalk to address ponding; 4) potential widening of the Beachwalk
at critical chokepoints; and 5) purchasing solar-powered electronic speed feedback devices and
data collection sensors.
Page 274 of 1157
At the February 21, 2025 FERC meeting, the Committee discussed this item and recommended
that the Administration proceed with the restriping and/or repainting of damaged and/or faded
green bicycle lanes citywide, subject to a Fiscal Year ("FY") 2025 operating budget amendment
in the approximate amount of$375,000.
ANALYSIS
Restripinq and/or Repainting Damaged and/or Faded Green Bicycle Lanes Citywide
The Transportation and Mobility Department recently conducted an assessment of the current
condition of all existing bike lanes (i.e. pavement markings and green paint) throughout the City.
Attachment C includes a draft report which identifies multiple locations which require restriping
and/or repainting as a result of peeling, fading, and/or poor restoration following underground
utility work. Based on unit prices from one of the City's rotational contracts, the estimated cost of
restriping and/or repainting approximately 46,496 square feet of damaged and/or faded green
bicycle lanes throughout the City is approximately $375,000.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
The estimated cost of restriping and/or repainting damaged and/or faded green bicycle lanes
citywide is approximately$375,000. Funding has not been identified, budgeted or appropriated at
this time in the Transportation and Mobility Department's FY 2025 operating budget.
Should the City Commission adopt a resolution accepting the recommendation of the FERC, the
Administration will present a FY 2025 operating budget amendment to the City Commission at
the April 23, 2025 City Commission meeting for consideration.
Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate? Click or tap here to enter text.
(FOR ORDINANCES ONLY)
If applicable, the Business Impact Estimate (BIE) was published on:
See BIE at: https://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/meeting-notices/
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
N/A
CONCLUSION
Should the City Commission adopt a Resolution accepting the recommendation of the FERC, the
Transportation and Mobility Department will engage one of the City's pre-qualified rotational
contractors to perform the restriping and/or repainting of damaged and/or faded green bicycle
lanes throughout the City in an expeditious timeframe, subject to City Commission approval for
funding appropriation through a FY 2025 operating budget amendment.
Applicable Area
Citywide
Is this a "Residents Right to Know" item, Is this item related to a G.O. Bond
pursuant to City Code Section 2-17? Project?
No No
Page 275 of 1157
Was this Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which, as defined in Code Sec. 2-481,
includes a principal engaged in lobbying? No
If so, specify the name of lobbyist(s) and principal(s): N/A
Department
Transportation and Mobility
Sponsor(s)
Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt
Co-sponsor(s)
Commissioner Laura Dominguez
Condensed Title
Accept Recommendation, Restriping of Green Bike Lanes Citywide. (Bhatt/Dominguez) TR
Previous Action (For City Clerk Use Only)
Page 276 of 1157
OLD BUSINESS{{item.number}} Attachment A
MIAMI BEACH
COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO: Public Safety and Neighborhood Quality of Life Committee Members
FROM: Rickelle Williams, Interim City Manager R(,)
DATE: July 10,2024
TITLE: DISCUSS REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND
DEVICES, ALONG WITH THE CITY'S ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS AND ANY
ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO AID IN
ENSURING THE SAFE OPERATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND DEVICES
FOR ALL.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Administration("Administration")recommends that the Public Safety and Neighborhood
Quality of Life Committee("PSNQLC"or"Committee")discuss this item and provide input and a
recommendation.
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
At the December 13, 2023 City Commission meeting, the Mayor and City Commission ("City
Commission")referred an agenda Item(C4 I), sponsored by Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt and
co-sponsored by Vice-Mayor Laura Dominguez,to the PSNQLC to discuss regulations pertaining
to electric vehicles and devices, along with the City's enforcement efforts and any additional
regulations that may be necessary to aid in ensuring the safe operation of electric vehicles and
devices for all.
Pursuant to the City of Miami Beach("City") Code of Ordinances, it is unlawful to operate any
motorized means of transportation, in, on, or upon any sidewalk or sidewalk areas in the City,
except for(a) wheelchairs or other motorized means of transportation when used by disabled
persons and(b)electric personal assistive mobility devices,where otherwise not prohibited,which
are restricted to a maximum speed of eight(8)miles per hour. It is also unlawful for any person
to engage in skateboarding, roller skating, and in-line skating at any time; to operate any
motorized means of transportation at any time; or to engage in bicycling between 9:00 a.m. and
2:00 a.m., on Lincoln Road between Washington Avenue and Alton Road. Furthermore, it is
unlawful to operate any motorized means of transportation at any time on the Beachwalk; the
Lummus Park Promenade (Serpentine Walkway between 5 Street and 15 Street); the South
Pointe Park Cutwalk(adjacent and parallel to Govemment Cut); the Marina Baywalk(adjacent
and parallel to Biscayne Bay and south of 5 Street); the interior pathways within South Pointe
Park and Collins Park;and the South Pointe Park Pier.
Beachwalk
The Beachwalk is an at-grade, paved, and highly utilized seven (7)-mile long shared-use path
facility abutting the western limit of the dune vegetation system along the east coast of the City.
The Beachwalk serves recreational,leisure,work and other trips throughout the City and is one
of the most active public trails within the state of Florida and a component of the United States
Atlantic Greenway Network extending from Florida to Maine.The Beachwalk's popularity,coupled
with its constrained width, contributes to frequent conflicts among pedestrians, bicyclists, and
other users sometimes resulting in crashes, including some with serious injuries. An additional
concern is the intermixing of pedestrians and unauthorized motorized/electric devices, including
electric stand-up scooters, electric bikes, and electric skateboards operating illegally on the
Beachwalk.Although Section 70-67 of the City Code prohibits motorized means of transportation
Page 277 of 1157
on the Beachwalk,among other pedestrian facilities throughout the City, the growing popularity
of these electric mobility devices poses a significant safety concern for pedestrians and an
enforcement challenge for the Police Department.
In March 2020, pursuant to the recommendation of the Neighborhood and Quality of Life
Committee("NQLC"),various city departments,including Police,Communications,Facilities and
Fleet Management,and Transportation and Mobility, collaborated to develop a holistic approach
to address the pedestrian safety concems on the Beachwalk through better signage and
enhanced enforcement. This effort resulted in the installation of 142 new regulatory signs along
the Beachwalk and at all Beachwalk entrance points to assist Police Officers and Park Rangers
with enforcing applicable provisions of the City Code. In addition,the City installed 70 advisory
signs along the Beachwalk to advise users that the area is a pedestrian-friendly zone where
permitted/non-motorized devices such as bicycles,skates,and skateboards must slow down and
yield to pedestrians(see images below).
Existing Advisory Signs on the Beachwalk
SLOW SHARED
DOWN PATH
YIELD TO YIELD TO
PEDESTRIANS ,_\` PEDESTRIANS L
{
1 t
0
i
1 � ,. 4
_: --- � - - '.;.. BEACH
•+ •.:'BEACH
Existing Regulatory Signs on the Beachwalk
./.44..NiAilik
PEDESTRIAN >..ti
FRIENDLY ZONE
„\D,c, it 14', (FM.ti. 1., ,,'''
NO MOTOR OR
_- ELECTRIC RIDES 4
Page 278 of 1157
In March 2021,the Miami Beach Police Department initiated a daily Beachwalk pedestrian safety
detail entitled"Clear Path'. Since early 2022, Police Officers and Park Rangers have conducted
regular enforcement of the Beachwalk, Including enforcement of Section 70-67 of the City Code
prohibiting motorized means of transportation on the Beachwalk.
In May 2022, to further enhance pedestrian safety on the Beachwalk, the Transportation and
Mobility Department launched an initial pilot project consisting of segregating bicyclists and
pedestrians between 15 Street and 24 Street(a typical 15'wide section of the beachwalk)through
striping and signage.The initial pilot required bi-directional bicycle traffic to travel along an 8'wide
path on the eastern side of the beachwalk.While the goal of the pilot program was to achieve the
separation of pedestrians and bicyclists on the Beachwalk, based on data analysis and field
observations, City staff concluded that the initial pilot was not practical and created significant
safety concerns due to the high amount of pedestrians and bicyclists traveling in opposing
directions within the same confined space which resulted in user non-compliance.User feedback
regarding the initial pilot configuration was overwhelmingly negative,particularly from cyclists who
felt that mode segregation was more unsafe than the original Beachwalk configuration. Users
stated that the initial pilot project provided insufficient space to accommodate bicyclists traveling
in both directions on only one side of the Beachwalk.
In light of staffs analysis, observations, and user feedback, the Transportation and Mobility
Department discontinued the initial pilot configuration, and, in September 2022, launched a
modified pilot within the same segment of the Beachwalk from 15 Street to 24 Street.The modified
pilot maintained the white painted solid line along the centerline of the Beachwalk and painted
new directional arrows and symbols in both directions guiding all users to keep right while walking
and cycling. To supplement the pavement markings and reinforce the new configuration, the
Transportation and Mobility Department worked with the Office of Marketing and Communications
to design and install new contextual signage in accordance with the modified pilot configuration.
Below is an image of the current signage within the pilot segment.
GO SLOW
BIKES YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS
SHARE THE PATH
KEEP
RIGHT
za
NO MOTORIZED MEANS
OF TRANSPORTATION
While the modified configuration is not intended to achieve the original goal of mode separation
along the Beachwalk,it provides a safer configuration for pedestrians and bicyclists as compared
to the original pilot configuration as it follows the basic rules of a two-way street where all traffic
traveling in the same direction keeps to the right side of the facility.This modified pilot program
remains in effect to date and has received generally positive feedback from users and support
Page 279 of 1157
from the Mid-Beach Neighborhood Association ("MBNA"). As a result of the current modified
pilot's effectiveness,through the Fiscal Year 2023 budget process,the City Commission endorsed
a funding allocation in the amount of$200,000 to implement the pavement marking and signage
enhancements throughout the entire length of the Beachwalk on a permanent basis.As further
described below in the Analysis section of this Committee Memorandum,this work is anticipated
to commence during summer 2024 with anticipated completion in fall 2024.
ANALYSIS
Under the leadership of Commissioner Tanya K.Bhatt,with the participation of the Administration,
a multi-departmental working group,including a representative from the Mayor's Office and a City
resident, is currently working on developing a comprehensive, multi-pronged, and unified
approach to improve micromobility, bicycle, and pedestrian safety on the Beachwalk and other
shared-use facilities as well as bicycle lanes throughout the City.The working group's focus areas
and participating City departments)are as follows:
• Crash Data/Statistics(Police)
• Enforcement of Current Regulations(Police/Park Rangers, Code Compliance)
• Beachwalk Safety Concerns and Recommendations(various city departments)
• Signage and Messaging(Marketing and Communications)
• Condition Survey of Existing Bicycle Lanes(Transportation and Mobility)
• Proposed Bicycle Lane Improvements and Safety Enhancements (Transportation and
Mobility)
In addition,on Saturday,April 4,2024,Commissioner Bhatt led a bicycle ride along the Beachwalk
with key members of the working group and residents to experience first-hand the safety issues
on the Beachwalk.
Below is a synopsis of each of the working group's focus areas, including relevant statistics,
issues,opportunities,challenges,recommendations,and next steps,as appropriate.
Crash Data
Given the Beachwalk is classified as a recreational shared-use facility and not a vehicular
roadway,during the working group's discussions, Police Department representatives articulated
a concern regarding the inability to capture specific crash data as it relates to micromobility
devices. Bicycle and pedestrian crashes are captured statewide via the Florida Traffic Crash
Report(Attachment A), a state-issued form provided by the Department of Highway Safety and
Motor Vehicles ("DHSMV"). Due to the automated nature of the form, specific information
regarding crashes/incidents by specific location and micromobility devices throughout the City of
Miami Beach is not currently available.Even as the DHSMV is considering modifying the standard
report to include micromobility devices,data from the form would only apply to crashes with motor
vehicles and not to incidents on the Beachwalk with pedestrians. The Police Department,
therefore, is exploring the possibility of capturing these incident types in-house through digital
changes to its departmentwide Offense Incident Report through which to better gauge and
document reported bicycle,pedestrian,and micromobility crashes throughout the City.
For reference,below is the Florida Statute pertaining to micromobility:
316.2128 Micromobility devices, motorized scooters, and miniature
motorcycles;requirements.—
(1) The operator of a motorized scooter or micromobility device has all of the
rights and duties applicable to the rider of a bicycle under s.316.2065,except the duties
imposed by s. 316.2065(2), (3)(b), and (3)(c), which by their nature do not apply.
However,this section may not be construed to prevent a local government,through the
exercise of its powers under s. 316.008,from adopting an ordinance governing the
operation of micromobility devices and motorized scooters on streets, highways,
sidewalks,and sidewalk areas under the local government's jurisdiction.
Page 280 of 1157
Enforcement of Current Regulations
The Miami Beach Police Department and Park Ranger Service began tracking Uniform Traffic
Citations,verbal warnings and written warnings related to the enforcement of the non-motorized
Ordinance(70-67)on the Beachwalk in October of 2021.Beat officers throughout the City,officers
assigned to the Redevelopment Agency("RDA"),and Park Rangers have proactively addressed
the illegal use of motorized vehicles on the Beachwalk daily and through various specialized
details that have run concurrently since 2022. Data regarding these activities is provided below.
Enforcement Related to Section 70-67
dh+Ma.aammnm.-tdm.+nnRaora. soni
113W3be m rl r.Jam�e 2332 2Ja lu+wry.luwl
Ptn 0.i5pn PWcannheni RO4 Pa+Ptagn Poll.Otnun R04 11a1112aagert Ptnod1k.n4 004 PP,Rtrtwn rake OfW MA
31Htceo.7odtitemicen_ NIA Il 1 121 `; b4 14 S I 3t/4 1 III `` •a I I NM 131
,'_ ® hwi trashd summer) taa I 3I1 1 b+r4 1139 ed I301i I 919 1 303 n _!_._'al_.
During the month of April 2024, the Police Department deployed a zero-tolerance campaign
strictly enforcing the prohibited use of micromobility devices on the Beachwalk. The Police
Department has also carried out social media campaigns to inform the public on the City
Ordinance,reached out to hotels in order to educate tourists,as well as distributed flyers on the
prohibited use of motorized/electric vehicle use on the Beachwalk.
Furthermore,from June 30,2023 to June 30,2024, the Code Compliance Department issued 16
violations for vegetation overgrowth(including hedges)on the Beachwalk between 24 Street and
61 Street.To date,the property owners cited have complied with these violations.
Beachwalk Safety Concerns and Recommendations
The working group has been discussing various Beachwalk safety issues and potential solutions.
Following is a fist of safety concerns identified by the working group and recommendations:
• Concern#1: Conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians traveling along the Beachwalk.
Recommendation#1 (In Progress): Building on the success of the existing modified pilot
configuration along the Beachwalk from 15 Street to 24 Street, the Transportation and
Mobility Department staff anticipates painting a continuous white line along the center of
the Beachwalk with directional arrows on either side along the entire 7-mile length of the
Beachwalk. Signage advising users to "KEEP RIGHT" (see below)will supplement the
new striping and pavement markings. This work is anticipated to commence in late
summer 2024 using one of the City's pre-qualified contractors and be completed in fall
2024.
KEEP
RIGHT
Page 281 of 1157
• Concern #2: Critical chokepoints along the Beachwalk result in conflicts and safety
concerns among users.
Recommendation #2: The Administration will identify all critical chokepoint locations as
well as opportunities for potential minor widening of the Beachwalk as feasible.
• Concern#3: Overgrown vegetation on private property encroaching onto the Beachwalk
results in reduced effective width for Beachwalk users.
.x a ; .-J r _# f-0t'
r• s Y d ~
a U .,
Recommendation #3: Explore new legislation requiring a private property setback from
the Beachwalk and developing regulations governing the type of vegetation permitted for
planting within the setback area.
• Concern #4: User conflicts due to limited sight visibility where private property egress
and/or beach egress intersects the Beachwalk.
?' Yam` f ra p:„
z
a- r
Recommendation#4:1)Install signage and/or advance warning pavement markings(e.g.
"LOOK")on the Beachwalk to alert users of approaching conflict zones.
LOOK
_J
Page 282 of 1157
2) At the May 15, 2024 City Commission meeting, Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt
sponsored a dual referral item (C4 AE) to the Land Use and Sustainability Committee
("LUSC")and the Planning Board to discuss an ordinance modifying the land development
regulations governing maintenance of oceanfront properties facing the Beachwalk.
Specifically, the proposed ordinance seeks to modify maximum allowable height of
fencing, walls, gates, shrubbery, hedges, and trees to ensure clear and unobstructed
sightlines for all who are traveling along, or entering/exiting the Beachwalk. The item is
slated to be discussed at the July 9,2024 LUSC meeting.
• Concern#5: Lack of street number signs at intersecting streets along the Beachwalk.
Recommendation#5:The Parking Department will manufacture and install street number
signs along the Beachwalk at each intersecting street and beach access based on the
working group's recommended sign design below.
E •
17
BEATREEDC
•
• Concern#6:Ponding at various locations along the Beachwalk affects safety and mobility.
S•-4 Y +f it ' w v^`� �f, r t 1+
gteachwalk at 17 Street r' B 1=chwalk at Loews Brine)
Recommendation#6:The Administration will identify locations where ponding occurs and
develop a work plan with estimated costs and timelines to implement spot-drainage
improvements at these locations. Should the fiscal impact require action by the City
Commission,the Administration will request funding.
Signage and Messaging Recommendations
The working group recommends that the City remove all existing mobility signs along the
Beachwalk which detract from the experience and are currently not providing much direction or
warning and install standard black and.white regulatory-type signs,including"SLOW DOWN"and
"KEEP RIGHT"signs as depicted above and below.
SLOW
DOWN
Page 283 of 1157
Regulatory signs are easier to recognize and understand by people of all backgrounds and
languages. In addition, the working group discussed the possibility of establishing a speed limit
on the Beachwalk and installing speed limit signs; however, Police Department representatives
expressed concerns with the inability to enforce a speed limit as most conventional bicycles are
not equipped with speedometers,thus making it difficult for cyclists to be aware of their speed.
The working group also recommends launching an organic,digital campaign to advise Beachwalk
users,including cyclists,skateboarders,in-line skaters,and non-motor scooters to"SLOW YOUR
ROLL.°The new temporary decals will be placed on the pavement to reinforce that all motorized
means of transportation are prohibited on the Beachwalk as depicted below.
SLOW YOUR ROLL SLOW YOUR ROLL
..:- owmt8EACHWALX ...; 'ON THE RFAtNWAU(1 /41).'";i0.1 ' ; ,:r_ - - si - ofir te...A,
t ........ .._-: „._=_....,_.:,.,..__ ..„..._ i. _..,....,._ .; - -- ._ . „ _..„... . .. ____ _._•....
-1,- _ „L„.
., .
..— -it.:,,,,:-.:4- li - i,-,,, L. - 0_ 1 t -.L.K., - _ _.,.-4-- --_--:„ 7-5, 16
2_, . v • . 0,..., 1 , , ., , e, . „• „......-1 . .._ .i.
- -0 . . 4. ,i)
_____.
..____ _
_ -
_.. x - ..�r... -
A similar campaign targeted to the Lincoln Road pedestrian mall will include the installation of
temporary decals on the pavement advising patrons to °WALK YOUR WHEELS" as depicted
below.
i J 4
WALK YOUR ` WALK YOUR
WHEELS WHEtELS •
, mo o LiNCOLNROAD
awasistritaN
I
0 ,..,,,... •,..,:32, - ,,,....,.... .--..." r.ri'
--. _ R f j r 'N -- —
,BEACH tA1As...BEACH
Page 284 of 1157
In addition, the working group recommends replacing the existing regulatory signs on Lincoln
Road(below)with a simpler regulatory sign which is easier to understand.
Existing Regulatory Signs on Lincoln Road
\' `1, PEDESTRIAN
.f '• , FRIENDLY ZONE A�° PEDESTRIAN ''` . _. _
,�,..
p FRIENDLY ZONE , 9AM2 NOBIKAME RIDING
f,, 3 L�`�4 11:
°. �' 0 0 r
f� �%`V , SEGWAYS&OTR
'' ,; MOTORIZED VEHICLES
`aouun[ww uco+asa or+a su�+.a -
y + ( : !` PROHIBITED
• j f 4A
rm rcH r' ., NO SKATING
Boards,Roller or Inane
Proposed Regulatory Sign for Lincoln Road
PROHIBITED
CITY CODE SEC.70-67
,,,, BIKE RIDING
9AM-2AM
eA„ E-BIKES
0
E-SCOOTERS
VIOLATORS WILL BE CITED
The working group anticipates that the updated signage approach and messaging campaign will
change behavior and enhance the safety of all Beachwalk users. Staff will communicate the
Page 285 of 1157
proposed signage changes with the Lincoln Road Business Improvement District. Costs for
signage production and replacement/installation may be absorbed through the Transportation and
Mobility Department's Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Operating Budget.
Condition Survey of Existing Bicycle Lanes
The Transportation and Mobility Department recently conducted an assessment of the current
condition of all existing bike lanes(i.e. pavement markings and green paint)throughout the City.
Based on the assessment, staff identified multiple locations which require restriping and/or
repainting as a result of peeling,fading, and poor restoration following underground utility work.
A draft report is anticipated to be completed in August 2024. The draft report will include the
locations that require restriping and/or repainting as well as cost estimates. Funding for these
improvements has not been identified,budgeted,or appropriated. In addition,the working group
will explore ways of ensuring that proper bicycle facility restoration by contractors is completed.
Proposed Bicycle Lane Improvements and Safety Enhancements
The Transportation and Mobility Department conducted an evaluation of projects recommended
in the adopted 2016 Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan("BPMP")to identify current project status
(i.e. completed, in-progress, funded/not started, not feasible, part of future neighborhood
improvement/infrastructure project, and unfunded). Attachment B includes a BPMP Project
Implementation Matrix.
It is important to note that 1)the BPMP is a visionary plan with a horizon year of 2035;2)many
pending BPMP projects are anticipated to have a significant impact to existing on-street parking;
and 3)while several BPMP projects have been completed or are underway in various phases of
development, many BPMP projects are pending construction as part of future large-scale
stormwater drainage/neighborhood improvement projects (e.g. West Avenue, 17 Street, 22/23
Street, North Bay Road, North Shore D,Washington Avenue, among others)or future roadway
improvement projects on State and County roadways to be undertaken by the Florida Department
of Transportation ("FOOT') and Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public
Works(e.g. Collins Avenue,Alton Road, Dade Boulevard,Venetian Causeway,among others).
Pursuant to the working group's recommendation, Transportation and Mobility Department staff
identified various pending BPMP projects which could potentially be undertaken in a relatively
short timeframe and at a low cost. Following is a list of six(6)"low-hanging" BPMP projects for
further consideration by the working group. It is important to note that greenways are defined in
the BPMP as low-volume, low-speed, and thus, low-stress streets that are designed for safe
bicycle travel(and do not include dedicated bicycle lanes).
1. Closing the bike lane gap on northbound Ocean Drive at 5 Street (traffic analysis in
progress pursuant to City Commission direction,however,construction is unfunded).
2. BPMP Category 1 -Project No.30: Bicycle lane on 5 Street between Collins Avenue and
Atlantic Way(construction is unfunded).
3. BPMP Category 3-Project No.6:Greenway on Michigan Avenue between 2 Street to 11
Street(construction is unfunded).
4. BPMP Category 3-Project No.15:Greenway on Prairie Avenue between 44 Street to 47
Street(construction is unfunded).
5. BPMP Category 3-Project No. 21: Greenway on 69 Street between Indian Creek Drive
to Atlantic Way(construction is unfunded).
6. BPMP Category 3-Project No.25: Greenway on Royal Palm Avenue between 26 Street
and 41 Street(construction is unfunded).
Solar-Powered Electronic Speed Feedback Devices
To deter cyclists speeding on the Beachwalk, the working group recommends that the
Administration test, as a pilot program, the effectiveness of solar-powered electronic speed
feedback devices-as depicted in the images below-at key locations on the Beachwalk.While
the devices would not display a speed or speed limit(due to concerns from the Police Department
Page 286 of 1157
regarding enforcement), the devices will serve to alert bicyclists to "SLOW DOWN" and raise
awareness while cycling on the Beachwalk.It is important to note that the below images are visual
place-holders as the Administration is currently conducting research on the most suitable sign to
install on the Beachwalk.
/
YOUR
SPEED
SLOW
DOWN
i
fa
YOUR SPEED
Q 0
!HHyK
Based on City staff's observations and coordination with the Police Department and Park
Rangers,the following locations have been identified as areas on the Beachwalk where conflicts
between users are regularly occurring due to high activity or speeding:
• South Pointe Park
• 5 Street
• 10 Street
• 14 Court
• 17 Street
• Lincoln Road
• 21 Street
• 27 Street
• 53 Street
• 64 Street
• 73 Street
• 75 Street
• 77 Street
• 79 Street
The cost of purchasing and installing these types of devices would range from approximately
$10,000 to$20,000 per device. Since posting a speed limit for bicycles on the Beachwalk is not
Page 287 of 1157
recommended by Police at this time due to challenges with enforcement, the working group
recommends programming the electronic speed feedback device such that it would display a
"SLOW DOWN"message if an approaching bicyclist is traveling at a rate of speed greater than
what would be considered a reasonable speed limit for bicyclists on a shared-use path with
pedestrians(i.e. 12 miles per hour).As such,any bicyclist traveling faster than 12 miles per hour
while approaching the electronic speed feedback sign would trigger a"SLOW DOWN"message.
It is worth noting that while these electronic signs can collect speed data, they do not collect
volume data and do not differentiate between motorized and non-motorized mobility devices.The
Transportation and Mobility Department staff is in discussions with various vendors to pilot, at no
cost to the City, these devices at a couple of locations on the Beachwalk(potentially at Lincoln
Road and at 77 Street)to gauge user compliance and effectiveness. It is important to note that
these devices are often used as a temporary measure to educate and change user behavior and
have utility beyond their use on the Beachwalk.
Speed,Volume,and Modal Data Collection Sensors
The working group acknowledged the importance of installing electronic sensors to collect speed
and volume data in real-time of pedestrians, bicycles, and micromobility devices, in order to
corroborate anecdotal information from users and make informed decisions and
recommendations to enhance safety on the Beachwalk and other shared-use paths, as well as
bicycle lanes throughout the City.In addition,it is essential for the data collection sensors to have
the capability to differentiate among the various modes (pedestrians, bicycles, scooters,
skateboards,in-line skates,etc.)and type of mobility devices(i.e.motorized and non-motorized).
To this end, the Transportation and Mobility Department recently purchased six (6) bicycle
counters which will be installed on existing bicycle lanes in the City, including Ocean Drive,
Venetian Causeway, and Meridian Avenue, in the next few months.Additional funding is being
requested through the ongoing Fiscal Year 2024/2025 budget process for the purchase and
installation of additional counters on bicycle lanes and shared-use paths throughout the City. It is
worth noting that the FDOT recently installed a new bicycle/pedestrian counter on the Beachwalk
at 54 Street as part of the Statewide Non-Motorized Traffic Monitoring Program.While the FDOT
counter classifies pedestrians, bicyclists, and scooters, it does not differentiate between
motorized and non-motorized mobility devices and does not collect speed data.
The working group also acknowledged the need to install sensors on the Beachwalk to collect
speed, volume, and modal data. Furthermore, the working group determined that any data
collection sensors to be installed on the Beachwalk should be wireless and non-intrusive in order
to be effective.The Transportation and Mobility Department staff is currently conducting research
to determine the type and number of data sensors to purchase and install along the Beachwalk.
An operating budget enhancement in the amount of$175,000 has been recommended by the
Administration as part of the ongoing budget process for Fiscal Year 2025 for the purchase and
installation of six (6) data collection sensors and six (6) speed feedback signs throughout the
Beachwalk.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
TBD
Does this Ordinance require a Business Impact Estimate?
(FOR ORDINANCES ONLY)
The Business Impact Estimate(BIE)was published on. See BIE at:
https://www.miamibeachfl.gov/city-hall/city-clerk/meeting-notices/
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
N/A
Page 288 of 1157
CONCLUSION
Under the leadership of Commissioner Tanya K.Bhatt,with the participation of the Administration,
the micromobility safety working group, comprised of representatives from various City
departments, the Mayor's Office, and a City resident, have been engaged in discussions to
explore innovative ways to improve the safety of all users on the Beachwalk and other shared-
use paths and bicycle lanes throughout the City.The goal of the working group is to develop a
comprehensive and unified work plan with recommendations, including potential new legislation,
for short-term and long-term improvements,cost estimates,and timelines for implementation.
This Committee Memorandum provides a status update on the working group's discussions,
ideas,and recommendations to date;however,further discussions are necessary to continue to
refine and finalize a comprehensive work plan.Additional updates will be provided to the PSNQLC
at future meetings.
Applicable Area
Citywide
Is this a"Residents Right to Know"item, Is this item related to a G.O.Bond
pursuant to City Code Section 2-17? Project?
No No
Was this Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which,as defined in Code Sec.2-481,
includes a principal engaged in lobbying? No
If so,specify the name of lobbyist(s)and principal(s): N/A
Department
Transportation and Mobility
Sponsor(s)
Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt
Co-sponsor(s)
Commissioner Laura Dominguez
Condensed Title
Discuss Regulations Pertaining to Electric Vehicles and Devices along with Enforcement Efforts
Page 289 of 1157
Attachment A— Florida Traffic
FLORIDA TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT Crash Report Form
LONG FORM SHORT FORM UPDATE TOTAL#OF VEHICLE SECTIONS)
IShned Areasi
MAIL TO: DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY&MOTOR VEHICLES TOTAL#OF PERSON SECTION(S)
TRAFFIC CRASH RECORDS,NEIL KIRKMAN BUILDING TOTAL#OF NARRATIVE SECTION(S) .
TALLAHASSEE,FL 3Z399-0537
!CRASH DATE r!TIME OF OLASl1 DATE OF REPORT REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER R15r,1V CRASH REPORT NUMBER '
! !
CRASH IDENTIFIERS
',COUNTY CODE CITY CODE!COUNTY Of CRASH (PLACE OR CITY OF CRASH ICHEOT IF WITHIN! 'TIME REPORTED PME DISPATCHED
• 1 ICON'OMITS
L_ ,
!TIME ON SCENE 'TIME CLEARED SCENE oiECR IF —,REASON(If Investigation NOT Complete) !Notified BY:1 Maroon
I COMPLETED'_, ;2 law Enforcement
ROADWAY INFORMATION(CHOOSE ONLY 1 OF 4 OPTIONS)
'CRASH OCCURRED ON STREET,ROAD,HIGHWAY ® AT STREET ADDRESS a O AT LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE '
I
',FEET ;MILES N S E W i
' I O AT/FROM INTERSECTION WflH STREET,ROAD.HIGHWAY OR FROM MILEPOST
�L __.., . • I 0
Road System Identifier 7 Fora;Road • Type of Shoulder Type of Intersections Traffic Clyde
llntertlate 4 County BPiwate Roadway -- 1Pav¢d 1 Not at Intersection 6Roundabout
2 U.S. 5local 9 Parking lot 1 Paved
' 2 Four-Way Intersection 7 Five-point or More
' 3 State 6Tumpike/Tog 77 Other,Explain In ! 3 T-Intesecton 77 Other,Explain in Narrative
Narrative 3 Curb I L—% 4 Y-Intersection
CRASH INFORMATION(CHECK IF PICTURES TAKEN).
L2ght Condition Weather Condition Roadway Surface Condition School Bus Related ' Manner of Collisionlimpact
1 DaREight 5 Dark-Not Lighted 4 Fog.Smog.Smoke -— 5 Oil i, --1 No I 4 51tlnw+
6 Dart-Unknown 5 Sleet/Hail/ 6 Mud,art,Gravel 7 Yes,S[hnol Rua ' pe,barn.Direction
• 3p Dusk
lighting Freezing Rain 7 Sand !Directly hwolked SSidawipe,Opposite Direction
4 Dark-Lighted 77 Other,Explain in 6 Blowing Sand,Soil. .._. B Water(ttanding/ .3 Yes,School Bus - 6 Rear to Side
Narrative DIN moNng) Indirectly Involved 1I Front to Rear 7 Rear to Rear
1 CI"! 7 Severe Uosswm: i Dry 77 Other,Explain 7/Other,Explain m Narrative
BB Unlmown 2 Cloudy 2 Wet 3 Angle
to Front lib Unknowvt
3 Ram 77 Other,Explain In 41ce/Frest - Namnye
Narrative lib Unknown 1.
First Harmful Event Non-Collision Collision Non-Plead Object Collision with Fixed Object .First Harmful Event
—L 1 Overturn/Rollover 10 Pedestrian 19 impact Artenuator/Gash 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier LOCatIOn
, 2 Fire/Explosion 11 Pedaltycle Cushion 31 Other Traffic Barrio 1 W(R0a a'� ,
3 Immersion 12 Rndwey Vehicle Irmn. 20 Bridge Cherhead Structure 32 Tree(standing) ,f—,
;__ 4 Jackknife engine) 7-1.Bridge Pier or Support 33 Utility Poe/Ught Support 3 Shoulder
I 5 Cargo/Equipment 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 34 Traffic Sign Support 4 Median
First Harmful Event; loss or Shih 14 Motor Vehicle,n Transport 23 Culvert 35 Traffic Sigrid Support _J 6 Rote
within Interchange' 6 FM/lumped From IS Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 36 Other Post.Pole or Support 7 Separator
lrCI Motor Vee 16 Work Zone/Maintenance 25 Ditch 37 Fence B In Parking Lane or Zone
• 1 No : 7 Thrown or Falling Equipment 26 Embankment 38 Mebox 9 Outside Right of way
2 Yes ; Object 17 Struck By Falling.Shifting 27GL:ere-rad Fare 39 Other Fixed Object(wall. 10 RoadsideUnknown
w B2 Unknon B Ran iota Water/Canal Cargo 2B Guardrail End building,tunnel,etc)
9 Other Non-Coaa»n is Other Non-Fixed Object 29 Cable gamer -
First Harmful Event Relation to , Contributing Circumstances:Road I Contributing Circumstances:
Junction E 9 Wore.Travel-Pallsttedsousace •• Environment
S Wetly Grade Crossing 10 Road Surface Condition(wet, i . —_
14 Entrance/Exit Ramp , icy,sow.slush,etc.) I
1S Crossover•-Related • — 11 OMrruction in Roadway .
16 Shared-Use Path or Trail 1 Nonc 12 Debris
1 Non-luordon 13 TraeK Control Device
2 Intersection 17 Aarientbn/Deretera[wn tone 4 Work zone(cornrrucbon/ Inoperative,Missing or Obscured I None 5 AM:nails)b'Roadway
3 Intersection-Related IR Through Rwdw:Y i maintenance/utility) 14 Nan"FGg$Away Wort 2 Weather Conditions 77 Other,Ea plain in
a Driveway/Alley Access 77 Other,Explain in Manatee 6 Shoulders(none,low,soft,high) 77 Other,Eiplam t•o Narraliva i 3 Physical Obstructiot(s) Narrative
Related e8 Unknown 7 Ru[,Holes,Bumps /38 Unknown 4 Glare BB Unknown
Work Zone Related Crash In Work Zone r Type of Work Zone 1 Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement in ,
I No !j 1 Before the First Work Zone - 1 Idne Closure t !'i 1 No -' Work Zone
2 Yes ' Warning Sign Ij 2 lane Shift/Crossover I 2 Yes 1 No
BA Unknown i 2 Advance Warning Area 3 Work on Shoulder or Median I RB Unknown 2IXncer Present
• 3 Trarsilion Area I 4Interreittent n Moving Work - 2 Law Enforcement Vehicle
4 Activity Area If Other,Eeptain m Narrative 3Law Present�— 5 Termination Area I I '
WITNESSES
NAME ADDRESS CITY&STATE OP CODE •
NAME ADDRESS CITY&STATE _.— ZIP CODE •
.
•
._ - — NAME - -- ADDRESS ----_ CITY&STATE HP CODE
I '
NON VEHICLE PROPERTY DAMAGE
!VEHICLE 4!PE.R50N R PROPERTY DAMAGE-OTHER THAT/ !EST.AMOUNT;OWNERS NAME ra(Check II Rosiness) ADDRESS CITY&STATE ZtP CODE I
I
1 I .
IVEHIE ICR:YERSON R jPROPERTY DAMAGE-OTHER THAN VEHICLE ZEST.AMOUNTiOWNER'S NAME (Check if Business) ADDRESS OTY&STATE ZIP CODE
I I
HSMV 90010 S(E)(ray 10/10)
Page_of_
Page 290 of 1157
REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER ' ItSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER
! - "[VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE 'REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanent:Nth
11 Whale in Transport (1 j 1 'Registration.
2 Parked Motor Vehicle
13 Working Vehicle _— i' • _ _
WI and Run SEAR �.. _.TMAKE ;MODE[ •._- 'STYLE [COLOR 'DAMAGE' _ •EST AMOUNT
•
Z No I 1 Disabling 'Minor
"
- ' 12 Functional 88 Unknown
188 UnknownI 13 None ---"!
;INSURANCE COMPANY ,INSURANCE POLICY NUM _BER Towed due r----VEHICLE REMOVED BY '1 Rotation
Ito 0amage: 2 Owner Request
I •
1 t Na 2Yes 3 Driver !
, I .14 Other,Explain Narrative
- __..
tr.
OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Rosiness)
• CURRENT AODRE55 CITY&STATE DP CODE
J
;TRAILER B1 LICENSE NUMBER I STATE 'REGISTRATION EXPIRES .Check it Permanent VIN YEAR MAKE ;LENGTH t,Ak1ES
l , !Registration I I I
7�AAllER®�LICENSE NUMBER '�STATE ,REGISTRATION EXPIRES ;C6eck ifPermanent INN _- --—_� -- (YEAR 'Melt LENGTH ,AXLES
'Registration — • I
VEHICLE N -S E Y/ 011-Eoad Unknown ON STREET,ROAD,HIGHWAY TAT EST.SPEED POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES
TRAVELING• - i
HAL MAT,RELEASED HAL MAT PLACARD HAL MAT.NUMBER 'HAI.MAT.CLASS Area of Initial Impact - Most Damaged Area
7 Yes f2 Yes 1 No Y
a ■ 4 • • 9 18 Undercarriage 8 a i{7{/4 O a
MOTanatomy°CAR 88 Unknown � (� II
19 -Overturn 19 C 11 f�1e
MOTOR CARRIER HAMS US DOT NUMBER T to Te n • • 1a t•u •
20 Windshield ZO
•
14 t• 17 it to • 21 Trailer Z3 Ye 12 12 11 to •
MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY E STATE ZIP CODE 'PHONE NUMRFR
Vehicle Body Type - -- Trafficway . Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration
----- 15 Low Speed Yehide 1 Iwo-Way,Not Waded 1 Vehicle 10023Ibs on less Placarded B Tractor/Tflpie
I6(Sport)Utility Vehicle ' 2 Two-Way,Not Divided,with a for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,0301bs(4,536
17 Jan t10,000 INn ' Conunoo:n Leh Turn Lane 1 Single-Unit Truck 12-axle and GVWR kg),Cannot Class:.
__ W,53 or less) • 3 Two War,Derided,Unprotected more man 1033001bs(4536 kg)) 10 Bus/Large Van eats for 9-IS
I Pxsanger Car 8 Motor Catch (po(pain n4 Feet)Median __. 3 heglnUtit Truck(3 cc more axles) occupants,Lndud'1ng driver)
2 Passenger Van 19 Other tight Trucks(10,0001nn 4 Tyro-Way,Divided,Positive Median 4 Truck Pu0mg Trm ierls 11 Bus(Sean for more man 15
3 Pickup (45 i 36 kg)or lest) garner S Toot Tractor{6oAtad) occupants,muscling dnvee)
7 Motor Home 20 McQumMoavy Trucks(more than, 50ne-Way TraReway • 6 Truck Tractor/Semi-Trailer 77 Other,Expainn in Nernnve
i 8 Rut 10,000 ibs(4,536 k4ll • 88 Unknown i Trailer Type _ 7 Truck Tractor/Double TNCk 88 Unknown
11 Mo[or[Ydc 71 Faint labor Vehicle ,TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 2 sing not so TMaire. Cargo Body Type
12 MepM 77 Other,Explain In Narrative i 2 Tandem Scot Trader a Pale Trailer ---- 3 Van/Enclosed Box 131ntermadal
T ®Unknown , 1 3Tank Trailer 9 Auto Vehicle Container Chassis
13 A11 am Vehicle(ATV) I 4 Saddle Mount/Trailer 10 Auto Transport • 4 Hopper 14 Vehicle Towing
CommlNon-Commercial 77 Other,Ea kS m. S Pole-Trader
5 coat p Tull/ ida Rooftree Vehicle
'Interstate Carder '-� "" 6 Utility Trager Narrative 6 Cargo Tank 15 Nat Apdtra0le
�— 2Intrastate Cartier 7 House Trailer 8a Unknown 1 No Cargo 7 naed vehicle QD0016s
3 Not in.Cnm m meene/GOvemrnt _ _. __--. ___. 2 Bus 8�l6n'P �4,536kgj less not
I-- 4 Not In Commerce/Other Truck - (4.536 k or less — 9 Concrete Mixer plo9n HM aordl
Comm I Ifl,IXKI ibs(5 fl ad
210,001-26,OWItrs 4536.11,793 kg) 10 Auto Transport. 770ther.Expteinin
Most Harmful Event In ANt/talon GVWR/GCWR 3 More than 26.000 s(11.793141 11 Garbage/Refuse Narrnkno
1 Overturn/R.11.Hr L_..._ 4 Not Applicable 12 Loa 88 Unknown
2 Ere/Explosion
3 Immersion Collision with Non-Fed Object Collision Fixed Object 19 Cable Barrier i Emergency
41ackknife 10 Pedestnan 121m22Al AUMu3IarfCraah CUSHIpn 30 Conotte Troche Banter
- S Carga/EgvPment Loss or Shift 11 Pedakysle 31 Other Traffic Barrier •Vehicle Use
6 FefFJlumped From Motor Vehicle 11 Railway Yehide(train,en d Overhead Structure
Sequence of Events 7 Threwn or falling O ect engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree(standing)
qB 13 Amoral 21 Bridge Pad 32 Tree
(standing)
SUpPort �-
8 Ran into Water/Canal 14 Motor Vehicle m Transport 34 Traffic Sign Su port
--21t"- '2e2_, 9 Other Non-Collision 15 Parked Motor Vehicle Culvert 35 Traffic Signal Support !
24 Curb
' • j40-465eeuence of n(blown
tr) 16 Work tone/Malntenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post,Pole,or Support 1 No
40 Egwpmenl fallure(blown bre. 1!SWte'nt 16 Embankment 37 fence i 2Yes
t-- brake failure.etc.) 175trvh lit TnMing,on 1ting Cargo or I7 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox I• gg Unknown
" _' 41 Separation of Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail EIM 39 Other fixed Obtect(wall,
42 Ran Off Roadway,Right Yehde bmMmg,tunnel,etc) I
! 43 Ryn Off Roadway.tea 18 Other NonFixed Object _ _..__ -
L 44 Cross Median' Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects
45 Coss Centerline • 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in TralEk - This Vehicle - -_46 Dawnhdi Runaway — !3 Turning Left i
Roadway Grade g 14 slowing
• - 1 Level 1 Roadway Alignment ' 's t Backing15 N Butlating a Gave 8 Flashing Signal
2 Hdinrit - , • g 16 Leaving TrafTa Lane ,_� 9 Ra Crossing --- • 12 Suspension
6 Changing lane! 1 Brake+ 14 Windows/
.4 Down 1 Curve R 17 Entering Traffic lane Device g 1 None 13 wnee3s
4 Downhill 2 Gave Right 8 Parked 77 Other,Explain in ;1 No Controls 10 Person(including
3 CLYve tell ID Meklrfg U-Turn Nyrrath. '3 Tires Windt/Veld
— S Sag(bottom)! 1 L i 45dmoi trne Sago/FN Officer,
it OverEi rig/ 68 Unknown Devicegoon, i a Lights(head, 15 Mirtan •
Pasting .I 5 Traffic Control Guard.3 wam„g SF n i banal,tad) 16 Triad[Coupling/
9 cola)Funetian 1 NO 59OU0 YMdpn 9A6 Circe- ---�14 Ilnternt7 Bus'-- 1 Sg et 77 co,.Explain. i 6Steering Trailer Hitch/
ri 4 - p 2 Farm YCtxcM lO fire Truax SS owner/Tour Tour eus 17 y p 518n Narrative "/Wipers Safety et,Eo0
i I of Motor Vehicle 3 Puike 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Run 7 yield Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other,Explain m ns !
7 Tad 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor But I ;10 Body,Doors Narrative .
_—" 8 Mi itary l3 Transit/Commuter eus 88 Unknown 1 11 Power Tram Rs Unknown
VIOLATIONS
'PERSONS NAME OF VIOLATOR Ft STATUTE NUMBER I CHARGE 1 CITATION NUMBER
'PERSON a NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER -CHARGE CITATION NUMBER
i
'PERSON 4 3, NAME Of VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUNt6ER • CHARGE CITATION NUMBER
HSMV 90010 S(VIP)(rev 10/10)
Page_of
Page 291 of 1157
REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER
PERSON#■ •
'1 Driver -- VEHIt1f d NAME -_---- - �PIIONE NUMBER •areck Ir
i2 non•Mownst 'Recommend
3 Passenger `- Driver Re-exam—
•
CURRENT ADDRESS(Number and Street) CITY&STATE --- ZIP CODE
'DATE OF BIRTH __.;SEX: —T DRIVER UCENSE NUMBER 'STATE EXPIRES LWUURRYV SEVERITY(INI)4 t�paatatinS --
;2 Mfemale , I • �.2 Possible S detel(within 30 and) •
18O unknown- I I !3 Non inca oaotating 6 Non-Traffic Fatality ---
DRIVER
DL Type I Required Endorsements Driver's Actions at Time of Crash
-li '
]A 2 B 3 C 1st 26 Ran WWI RoadwayPnT Condition At _____
a D/Chaulfe,r l ves S No Contributing Acton 1st
Disregarded other TrafficTime of Crash
I - 2 No 1 Operated MV in Careless or
S E Operator I 3 No Reg Endorsement , Negligent Manner ]ADparen[1y Hormel
6 None -wen ) 3 Failed to Yield f ight-W.Way 2a Disregarded Other Rued 3 Asleep or Fatigued �-
7 None I `J__ kr"� S IR(Sick)or Fainted
_ 4 Improper Racking 29 Over•Correctma/Over.
Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle Inn 6Improper Turn Steering 4th 6 Seizure,Epdpps.Blackout
1 Not Distracted (eaplaln in narrative) 10 Followed too[body 30 Swerved or Avoided:Out 7 Physically Impaired
Catlin)( nh'nIion 11 Ran Red tight to ie d,Sli Surface,MV, 8 Emotional( esslgn,
2 Electronic Communication Slippery
Devices(ceE phone,etc) (outside the vehicle,explain 12 Drw n too Past for Coalitions Obf5.No re.taro[u+ angry,d;s[or et‘)
3 Other Electronic Device amatwel 13 Ran Stop Sign Pawing Roadway,etc 9 Under the Influence of
(navigation device,Dw player) 7 Tbnaftergntwe 17 Eo ridded Posted Speed 31 Operated MV In ive Ma 77 Other,EMeath �xplamgt1
Aleolval
PR Unkrawn TWr Sdnef Wren W 77coth Cor ngjbolinR Manner M Unknown
Nartattve
Driver Vision Ohstrucliorrs , 25 Fared to Keep m Proper Lane 77 Osier[ontr,buting Action 1
I— - 1 Alan Not Obtnored 5 Load can Ve!kde 9 Smoke DRIVER OR PASSENGER
2 Inclement Weather 6 goading/Fixed Object 10 Ware
j ' 3 Parkedlls000ed Vebk4 7 cgns/&'Rooards 77 All Other,Explain I —,
4 Trees/Crept/Rather 8 Fog In Narrative Helmet Use(HU) • Eye Protection(EP) . Restraint Systems
DRIVER OR PASSENGER olwMeH " ;I o_ Ml elmet 2 N i (RS)
Motor Vehicle Seating Position: riOCATtON:SEAT ROW OTHER ' 2 Other Helmet I i 3 Not Applicable 1 Not Applicable
(LOCI • 3 No Helmet I• ' '2 None Used-Motor Vehicle Occupant
' Seat Row Other Air Ba De to ed ;3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used
3 Leh l wont I Not AppliP61e - : 0 P Y 5 Deployed other a ShouMer set;O"H Laud
x Middle 7 Second 2 Sleeper SCn lion of Truck Cab ---Election '(ABD) (knee,err belt.etc 1 S tap Ben Only Used
3 Right 3 Thud 3 Other Enclosed Cargo Area (EJECT); 6 Deployed. 6 Relnoort Used-Type Unknown
77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area - 1 Not Ejected '' - 1 Not ApdicabLe boor aeon 7 Child Restraint System-Forward Facing'
•
2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed-Curtain 8 Child Restraint System-Rear Facing
(eeplin m T7 Other Row S Trailing Una 2 Ejected,7on1ry1y F ot'�
rrat�ve) RR Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior(non- '3 Si ed.EodhIe y'.-J 3 Dedoycd roes g8 known mt ;9 Bgold Seat
—J 4 UnAppl&abk 4 DeNgycd Sde Unknown 10 Chin Rertreint Type in-Narrative
Unknown
86 Unknown trailing town 8g Unknown ' ;77 Other,Explain in Namtive ,
Sa Un4wrm -
NON-MOTORIST
Non-Motorist Description Non-Motorist Location At Time of Crash I Action Prior to Crash
1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection-Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk ,____, 5 Wareinp/Cycl ne Sidewalk
10ther Pedestrian(wheelchair,person era 2 Intersection•Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median/Crvwng Island 6 in Roadway-Other(working.
building,[katoc,pedestrian conveyance.etc)" te'3 Inrsecta Driveway-Other 10 veray Access I 1 0ayin6 ate)
3 Bicyclist '4 Midblock-Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared-Use Path or Trail 7 Adjacent to Roadway Leg., .
A Other Cyclist __'5 Travel Lane Other Location 12 Non-Traffteway Mee 1 Crossing Roadway shoulder,median)
5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Transport, 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other.Cadaln in Narrative 2 Welting to Cross Roadway 8 Going to or from School(K 12)
(parked etc I 7 Shoulder/Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking/Cychng Along 9 Waking in Traff ay
6 Occupant of a tionf lotor Vetncte '-- Roadway with Traffk(in or (incident resoonte)
Transportatwn Device Non-Motorist Aetions/C(reumstanees ,adjacent to travel lane) 10 None
7 Unknown Type of Non•Moterct -- 1 No Improper Acton 4 Walking/Cycling Along 7/Other,Explain in Narrative'
l 2 Dart/Dash Roadway Against Traffic fin or 811 Unknown
Safety Equipment tat 3 Failure to Yield Rightrof-Way 'adjacent to trasd lane)
1 None 5 Lighting - ; 4 Failure to Obey Traffic lion. - -
'2 Helmet 6 Not APp,rca=s • , Signals,or Officer 7 Entering/Ecting Parted/Standing 10 howw,-r Turn/Merge
3 Protective Pads Used 77 Ot er,Explain : Sin Roadway Improperly hoandreg, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing
'(elmed,knees,siting,etr.l In Narration 2.d 1 IYmg,wot6rtrtgg,,playing) 8 Inattentive(talking,eetmy etc) t1 ng
Wro -Way RId rig Sr Walking
'4 Reflective Clothing(jacket, 88 Unknown ' 6 Muffled Velerte Related(worriers 9 Not Visible(dark darling.no 77 Other,Explain in Narrative
backpack etc.) I `J on.pushing,leawng/appreechmg) P Unknown ghtrng.etc.) S8 known
ALCOHOL/DRUG/EMS
'SUSPECTED ALCOHOL TESTED IALCOHOI TEST TYPE:'ALCOHOL I BAC 'SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: D '
RUG TEST TYPE_ DRUG TEST RESULT:
:ALCOHOL USE: 1Test Not Given . 'Il Blood 'TEST RESULT !DRUG USE:P. 1Ten Not Given— Il Blood ' 1 Positive ,
'I No 2 Test Refused '12 Breath 1 Pending i ,i' I,1 No I 2Test Refused 1 ! 3 Urine �2 Negative
!2 Yes l 3 Test Given 3 Urine 2 Completed 2 Yes —' ;3 Test Given — 77 Other. ' '.3 Pending
;88 Unknown, , 188 Unknown,ifTested 177 Other-Explain in 88 Unknown i ' 88 Unknown as Unknown,if Tested :Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown'
Narrative I 'MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO
;SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACtUTY IEMS AGENCY NAME OR ID -EMS RUN NUMBER i
1 Nut TransportedI
)2 EMS 3Law Enforcement ` i I ; I
:77 Other,E., m in Narrative 88 Unknown I
ADDITIONAL PASSENGERS
;PERSON R,MCHICIE a;NAME DATE OF BIRTH IS) 'SEX ;IOC:S R 0 ;EIKE I HU I EP .ABD RS
I I i i I
' CURRENT ADDRESS(Number and Street) are&STATE 71P CODE
I IEMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO
OVRCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITY 'EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID
1 Not Transported I ;
I2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement '
:77 Other,Explain'n Narrative 88 Unknown - : - -
PERSON a(VEHICLE d!NAME ,DATE OF BIRTH '(NJ SEX LOC:S R 0 ;EJECT'HU 'EP I-ARG RS ',
.
CURRENT ADDRESS(Number and Street) CITY&STATE ZIP CODE
SOURCE UT TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITY IEMS AGENCY NAME OR ID {EMS RUN NUMBER 'MEDICAL FACIUTY TRANSPORTED TO
1 Not Transported
i2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement I
)77 Other,Explain rn Narrative 88 Unknown _
HSMV 90010 S(VIP)(rev 10/10)
- Page ,_of_
Page 292 of 1157
•
REPRO RIG AGENCY USE NUMBER • HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER
NARRATIVE
I '
ADDITIONAL PASSENGERS
!PERSON e;VEMCLE a!NAME ;DATE OF BIRTH 'INJ !SEK LOC-S• R 0 ,;EJECT'%HU 'EP A80 'RS
I
-- CURP.ENT ACHJRESS(Number and Street) CITY&STATE ZIP CODE
SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITY - ',EMS AGENCY NAME OR 10 ;EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FAOIJTY TRANSPORTED TO
.1 Not Transported I
ITEMS 3 law Enforcement 1 I i
77 Mtn;!Explain In Narrative 88 Unknown
!PERSON a iVEHIOE a?NAME (DATE OF BIRTH "71N1 SD1 'LOC.S R O 'EJECT;HU ;EP ABO RS
II1. —
CURRENT ADDRESS Number and Serest) CITY&STATE ZIP CODE
r
SEURCF OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FAGOT(- !EMS AGENCY NAM(OR ID (EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACIUTY TRANSPORTED TO
II Noe TransPoned
�1 FMS 3 Law E I m nt 1---1
77 O[hn.Cs.ain Tin SOnAT ve BB Unknown
ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS
!PERSON a I NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER : DIARGE CITATION NUMBER
I '
,PERSON a -; NAME OF VIOLATOR —' FL STATUTE NUMBER ! --- CHARGE CITATION NUMBER
1 '
I ' !
REPORTING OFFICER
10/BADGE NUMBER ;RAM&NAME DEPARTMENT FHPJ f SO PO OTHER I
HSMV 90010 S(WO)(rev 10/10)
Page_of
Page 293 of 1157
BLANK PAGE FOR DIAGRAM
Page,of_
Page 294 of 1157
Attachment B—BPMP Project Implementation Matrix
Bike Miami Beach Master Plan Implementation MatrixIA
1113 01.3. .SAen
0 IS WI
IA
10 n
n _. m— ..: Wu w. 161f
w
12 „s ,,,._, —.— . .�,.. ,o. ..- v - * „��,m
0)
co 14 �,-- ,..,.a.,. .,. -- ,A' A w.. I
• 1'r�:, — ,tea, .,'°'°.a' ..sa a. a w rs.e. ..... ,my,
LL . ,...cam ,..,.�. — ., ma.. r m **PP m+ewe.n
• 17 .. —„ . ,. ,emy vo.
0
P. ' 1g' Aw'. .... ... .,„Dup. ..,..,...„.. w a :,e .. w
Al mar
U ,-
1'9:. —,.... , — x M elte et ea
r,
c i ,. r re,.n am+�,
20. ` a --
21 .4 , 'n, m w ,„
23 s a .,
emu„
28 —� .. , -- k 20 a,1,,
30 9 ,.... _ w._
Page 295 of 1157
Bike,Miami Beach Master Plan;Implementation Matrix.
p} r y# y
■ .s.,.,•.. w.s.n ma..s.e..... w ..... xcru
344
2> m.' ..0 a Mr.ew.. r ;aw
8 ms.,;^. 5.s.`en,.:... 'Swy h.P0454.44
1
gA _'$`-, ....Ase.a.-r a rat b .-- =
412 r .[aa
am+.-e. waT p H M N P
Oe re tt we nos,,:
'
N 8 - ,�k 5 bn ad. GO -W agy Y . h 53.66. p50
3
m . S 550.6 w w4540 15AYf A
ray- 5.ae.vew. yMw .TM
S.
13,660,6
yt u•v...e .a�.r rm ice, . *�+�.o Es. �w
•
X.w. 12 °° :-' ..,
56a* 1 IS la
N'
•
13 -- ...
_ „„,,
40
Q -..1w.{...m to , ,.est 3.6.40 ate.,:,. ... 'Oa 55... two in ry;Wf
18 ..... a.— ,- n.— _. . M.
20 a.oaa. ,r.,. , ••r- m:.. .< ,e' x „ ..,
22 .,A ...,ve, .b..mu..,..•a ..
24 >m ...r_
Page 296 of 1157
Id l, Catogory 3!AsplraUonal
tqS x ip W NN1NNN NNcoM i '- (O ‘11 OE (xi ? ->. co
S f1f1[k I N� CO ig7f Oi UI �OfO ma . ® - •
S i w t f i i t 1 I : t i [ I e I t r r
,13),.
IE li fa G 7i 1i Ili pfcti IS fi Is fa 1t U is lE ft ft Et 7+ Is Ix li @
li (I ri Ii t, !I •035 50 k_I 5 0 0 5 Ii 0 0 It 5 0 0 ti 5 '" -
S l I f f f l t i 1 l lift f I ElI
rift t I t I f I I IIII I ( I III t t t t 1 t t t t t I gii
!I HI I
E
ff f IIf If ,fI f Efi'' ;. IfIIIlIi, I E Ii fi f ( t I+ II,'i �# I t1 ii f!y ij i? 1P Ev I r II I t ix ii '
c + it E `IIi I r i f 3 i 1 i t l i I 1 � '
W U d 4 4 , E a 19 o i t + + ■ i x 5 i 9
an e C I x i iY 1 l 4 a i a I C a t e A i ■ i
4
aD
IQe d 1 I I i 1 E f 1 I I I I i I fig e I I a +«M' ,'�
Co i f t r s I I
V 4 e.
° I l l i i if ; t I 1 1 f i 1 Miff i 1 I 1 I 1 d If I I I I i i Ii Ii If
Iv _
••••I s` xi xi xi tI s' s? �eyi1ft5, el E! s$ ,I aE ii it xi 4 t: xi t'7 t' a4 t@ ,. , X`
,� r i - a a E
Attachment B
•
•
r r.I I , \ ''' ': .sAF. . . ..y.:_4•, - :,...... ::: ,,, , ,,
_ .,.. ...... : , ,
' ' ' ET- ,
. . . . . . . i„,.. ..
, . . .
. . ..
• .• .
.. . .
.. ... .... . .. ,
. .
. ,
, . ..
.. . , .
13 . . . ,., . , ,.. ..... ,. ., .• . , . „...
w , .
C ' M. , .
. ,. .., . .
w . _ .
.
,......„.,.. . : ,.....„.,;:,,..,.., . .,.. . ,.. . .. ,...„.. . .. .. . ,
. • . . .. .., .... .. .,.. .„.. . . •, ,.. ,.....,...,, ,
CO .... . • •, •... . . . , ,... ,,,, • .„.. • .
. .
, , .„ ....., . . .., .„
... .. .
, .. • , ..... ,.. .... „...
O
Public Safe. . and Neighborhood
�, � ty . � _ ighborhood Quality.� �f Life Committee
July 10, 2024
i`.._� r
Background - Beachwalk
Sec. 70-67(c) of the City Code
• It is unlawful to operate any motorized means of transportation at any
time:
o The Beachwalk
o The Lummus Park Promenade (Serpentine Walkway between 5 tilw
-13 Street and 15 Street) O
o The South Pointe Park Cutwalk (adjacent and parallel to
Government Cut)
0 o The Marina Baywalk (adjacent and parallel to Biscayne Bay and -m
south of 5 Street)
o The interior pathways within South Pointe Park and Collins Park .1`v•
•
o The South Pointe Park Pier
Sec. 70-67(d) of the City Code
• It is unlawful to operate any motorized means of transportation on
any sidewalk in the City.
2 MIAMIBEACH
. Signage — Beachwalk
Concern .
• Existing advisory and regulatory signs along the Beachwalk detract from the experience and are not
easy to understand.
GO SLOW
BIKES YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS
ED
SLOW SLOW SHARE THE PATH
DOWN DOWNlit
PEbESTR1AN CD
KEEP O
CD FRIENDLY ZONE
o YIELD TO YIELD TO R m .. t�wR� RIGHT
PEDESTRIANS „ -r, PEDESTRIANS k „:,, ? ..
NO MOTOR OR
.4 fi. . 'hh' " 1 ,w.N0h'•
•;. .."; N \ELECTRIC RIDES
rR ,, „ on ..4 1�,.. 'tit . ..�....., NO MOTORIZED MEANS
,,,k1.',BEACH WI,�,rBEACH OF TRANSPORTATION
4 ..... n7=4::-.17... '..w.+ r.D. n...W B€ACH
3 MIAMIBEACH
Signage — Beachwalk
Recommendation
• Removing all existing advisory and regulatory signs along the Beachwalk and install standard black
and white regulatory-type signs.
r 1 li
(ND
7/ KEEP
c
c
W
0 SLOW .11+
0
E,-, YIELD
..,
DOWN , TO
RIGHT PEDS
. ,
4 MIAMIBEACH
Signage — Beachwalk
Concern KEEP I
• Conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians traveling
along the Beachwalk.
CD
CO
Recommendation
IV
• Painting a continuous white line along the center of the 7 MI+
-
511 mile Beachwalk with directional arrows on either side.
• Signage advising users to "KEEP RIGHT" will supplement
the new striping and pavement markings. RIGHT
5 MIAMI BEACH
Signage — Beachwalk
' �'. p? 22C2 = 3J2t2Z P
# 1/4 ';': 4' . R,'",VP4.1a -i a644)C
I ; ?1iai( ,Bepcl-,FL gg39„�
Concern �- �{ �? "`r��..\; e
x�' ¢. , ci q r' . -ram! C
• Overgrown vegetation on private property encroaching .mr. f �5{. ,, , 1
onto the Beachwalk results in reduced effective width for - ,- 1rs ,::c �`�'1/4 fJ
co Beachwalk users. '� yam , ' f _
CD
Recommendation , ,
• Explore new legislation requiring a private property a •`/ ','"` I i
clisetback from the Beachwalk and developing regulations Ei }' 1 .ilt `� �,&',`" J
governing the type of vegetation permitted for planting Fa f� `�' >c .
' � '
within the setback area. r rr s ` L , " `' r
I s w - ,-.
i ;,;,„ ' n I L. ti J' —ii/1' .,"' - %,,
r
'! r! �
6 MIAMIBEACH
Signage — Beachwalk
, ,,,1/4-4 ,,,,,, ‘,i0:; ,,, ;,,opz,"..,•,: 1,4,7,,r7 ,.777-
Concern ` _ ;, r ,- . ...
• User conflicts due to limited sight visibility where _ . ' " . . .., , "
private property egress and/or beach egress :-
intersects the Beachwalk. ', ' ` - i � _� . y ..
_
Recommendation L s .
cra • Install signage and/or advance warning i.4 ,:,;• , ,,' ;4.
o pavement markings (e.g. "LOOK") on the .„'.... ;;0µ'
Beachwalk to alert users of approaching conflict : „u
PP 9 ,''y�yrr ,�w
zones.
• Proposed Ordinance sponsored by ( 1
Commissioner Bhatt on July 9, 2024 LUSC
meeting to limit allowable height of fencing, 41111111111111=1M+
walls, gates, shrubbery, hedges, and trees of
properties fronting the Beachwalk. LOO K
7 MIAMI BEACH
Signage - Beachwalk
Concern
• Lack of street number signs at intersecting 1 7
streets along the Beachwalk.
CD
CA)
o Recommendation STREET
• Install street number signs along the
Beachwalk at each intersecting street and BEACHWALK
beach access.
8 MIAMI BEACH
Digital Campaign — Beachwalk
• Launching an organic, digital campaign to advise Beachwalk users to "SLOW YOUR ROLL."
• Temporary decals on the pavement will reinforce that all motorized means of transportation are
prohibited on the Beachwalk.
SLQW YOUR ROLL SLOW YOUR..ROLL
- OM LaHW :04 THeStArkiwitli* ,
.,
,
. ' .6: "Zsil s7.74(‘IPP\
al : -,,-litto,161s,ftelt,-,litc.,, .r. - -
r:V naklea"-;1;Vr"--*"' ))"CN,\\,,1F..-l'‘^t,,, ,) " `' '
(Se
• # (3
n M
F
d '
9 1M IAMIBEACH
Background - Lincoln Road
1-421-1
-1
�:` V
Sec. 70-67(a) of the City Code
_ __
• It is unlawful to:co
11)
• Engage in skateboarding, roller skating, and in-line roil
CD
skating on Lincoln Road at any time
0 • Operate any motorized means of transportation on
o •
Lincoln Road at any time 1____T
• Engage in bicycling between 9 a.m. and 2 a.m. on - --.-1
Lincoln Road I ttl
10 MIAMIBEACH
Signage — Lincoln Road
Concern
• Existing regulatory signs along Lincoln Road detract from the experience and are not providing much direction or warning.
Recommendation
• Removing all existing regulatory signs along Lincoln Road and install standard black and white regulatory-type signs
v F11;i1jESTRIAN PROHIBITED
f�D "`r f�-FRIENDLY ZONE _ CITY CODE SEC.70-67
CA) tt
PEDESTRIAN i y BIKE RIDING
ato / FRIENDLY ZONE � l BI<!. 1DING 9AM 2AM
cri (,,,,\ 0 0 (S)
j~ MOTWOARYIZS OETHHIECL ES ?
E-BIKES
PbrA 4764I tla �.w.u.* • PROHIBITED
d 'IPlid501 NO SKATIN
0 ��5.Role o�GIn L na E-SCOOTERS
/ 1 ,u c x411,4>, Mlr,MBEA 0F1 VIOLATORS WILL BE CITED
Existing Regulatory Signs on Lincoln Road Proposed Regulatory Sign for Lincoln Road
1 1 MIAMI BEACH
•
Digital Campaign - Lincoln Road
• A similar campaign targeted to the Lincoln Road pedestrian mall will include the installation
of temporary decals on the pavement advising patrons to "WALK YOUR WHEELS."
�I
BALK 'Y}OU R 11�' 4LK YO.0 i
THEE e,141
WHEELS ' ' :;
O l ahr l+dpttn nraiatl Ni, 1 sfadfeboard aq r G ikai r or
CO , a t•w sa s nr ro may a m
'< S' 9' "fi: a,.n tiw� �Q4wa�iotc',�4 7N ru:. r a,.
0 _ k f #,11-- �''''''!A.....C',': a - `,jai• i "
al
A `
r�iAM'BEACH rJ,IA.:.IBEACH
12 MIAMIBEACH
Enforcement Data and Statistics - Beachwalk
Concern
• Inability to capture specific crash data as it relates to micromobility devices since the Beachwalk is
classified as a recreational shared-use facility and not a vehicular roadway.
Recommendation
- • Exploring the possibility of capturing these incident types in-house through digital changes to its
cv
on departmentwide Offense Incident Report through which to better gauge and document reported
bicycle, pedestrian, and micromobility crashes throughout the City.
O
Enforcement Related to Section 70-67
_u (Prohibition of motorized means of transportation)
2021
(October-December) . 242Y (January June)
Park Rangers PoUce Officers RDA Park Rangers Police Officers RDA Park Rangers PoUce Officers RDA Park Rangers Police Officers RDA
Uniform Traffic Citations N/A 37 127 N/A 54 2 N/A 74 1 N/A 170 1
.._ .......
WrittenWarniin: 3686 259 123 18 356 31 106 4 28 156 59 2
Verbal Warnin. (not tracked separately) 188 321 8966 1139 676 13652 919 308 1992 313 147
13 MIAMIBEACH
Facilities and Infrastructure — Beachwalk
Concern
• Ponding at various locations along the Beachwalk affects safety and mobility.
Recommendation
• Identify locations where ponding occurs and develop a work plan with estimated costs and timelines to
implement spot-drainage improvements.
- o Should the fiscal impact require action by the City Commission, the Administration will request funding.
CO
CD � , ,
_. , ?"'...13-.:- Nil -:' y Eli.. ., ..;, ,::,:i ., ,I, t.trir -.. 0 p
-.1 ."'",• -1"k's '11 .114/‘. ., ift '''44° N4 -''
m r k r
O - •• ' '4:' B chwalk at 17 Street B ,,achwalk at Loews Hotel
14
MIAMI BEACH
Facilities and Infrastructure — Beachwalk
Concern
• Critical chokepoints along the Beachwalk result in conflicts and safety concerns among users.
Recommendation
• Identify all critical chokepoint locations as well as opportunities for potential minor widening of the
0)
Beachwalk as feasible.
CD
o Concern
• Bicycle facilities requiring restriping and/or repainting as a result of peeling, fading, and poor
restoration following of underground utility work.
Recommendation
• Identify all locations that require restriping and/or repainting as well as cost estimates.
• Explore ways of ensuring that proper bicycle facility restoration by contractors is completed.
15 -. MIAMIBEACH
Facilities and Infrastructure — Beachwalk
Solar-Powered Electronic Speed Feedback Devices
Concern
• Bicyclist speeding on the Beachwalk.
-;,.r'
Recommendation /.<:,..=r.
-13
• Pilot Program to test the effectiveness of solar-powered VOURSPEED
co
W electronic speed feedback devices. ,� (°,,)
o The devices will serve to alert bicyclists to SLOW YOUR
w y SPEED ,
o DOWN" and raise awareness while cycling on the
Beachwalk. DOWN
SLOW H 'K !
Speed, Volume and Modal Data Collection Sensors li
•
• Install electronic sensors to collect speed and volume data
in real-time of pedestrians, bicycles, and micromobility
devices.
16 MIAMI BEACH
Facilities and Infrastructure — Citywide
Proposed Bicycle Lane Improvements
• Transportation and Mobility Department staff identified various pending BPMP projects:
o Closing the bike lane gap on northbound Ocean Drive at 5 Street (traffic analysis in progress
pursuant to City Commission direction, however, construction is unfunded).
o BPMP Category 1 - Project No.30: Bicycle lane on 5 Street between Collins Avenue and Atlantic
ED
Way (construction is unfunded).
W o BPMP Category 3 - Project No. 6: Greenway on Michigan Avenue between 2 Street to 11 Street
7,1 (construction is unfunded).
° o BPMP Category 3 - Project No.15: Greenway on Prairie Avenue between 44 Street to 47 Street
(construction is unfunded).
o BPMP Category 3 - Project No. 21: Greenway on 69 Street between Indian Creek Drive to
Atlantic Way (construction is unfunded).
o BPMP Category 3 - Project No. 25: Greenway on Royal Palm Avenue between 26 Street and 41
Street (construction is unfunded).
• Greenways are defined in the BPMP as low-volume, low-speed, and thus, low-stress streets that are
designed for safe bicycle travel (and do not include dedicated bicycle lanes)
17 MIAMIBEACH
Next Steps
• Explore new legislation requiring a private property setback from the Beachwalk and developing
regulations governing the type of vegetation permitted for planting within the setback area.
• Exploring the possibility of capturing bicycle, pedestrian, and micromobility crashes throughout the
City through digital changes to its departmentwide Offense Incident Report.
v
• Identify locations where ponding occurs and develop a work plan with estimated costs and timelines
W to implement spot-drainage improvements.
0 • Identify all critical chokepoint locations along the Beachwalk as well as opportunities for potential
minor widening as feasible.
• Identify all locations that require restriping and/or repainting as well as cost estimates.
• Explore ways of ensuring that proper bicycle facility restoration by contractors is completed.
• Refine low-hanging BPMP projects.
18 MIAM1BEACH
;.i
•
•
•
•
•
-•
•
•
•
•
•
M't
'•
9 I ,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Page 316 of 1157
Attachment C
MAM BEACH
City of Miami Beach. 1700 Convention Center Drive,Miami Beach.Florida 33139,www.miamibeachfl.gov
TRANSPORTATION &MOBILITY DEPARTMENT
Tel:305-673-7514
October 22, 2024 Field Visit Analysis
SUBJECT:Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Background Data:
• Current Green Bicycle Lanes Map:
11
NORJ = .cH
t•
GORE
{
•
V'''`' Miami Beak h
a•.Q
•
•
NAU7 .1S
•
•
F-B+'AClt
ddsTifYCwy.. ie.
LAY HOSE
•
•
•
•
,praicde�l-
� '
WEST AVFNU
STAR PAL?.,1 SOU( E OH
dD HIBISUS H A L
s_' Aid ti C i i.)i .I
Dodge Island " _— 1\, — _ N
Field Visit Analysis:
Field visits were conducted on May 25, 2024 and May 26, 2024.
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and play in our vibrant,
tropical,historic community.
Page 317 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page I 2
1. 172-244 Alton Road:
Green striping is peeling off
R
ti 1 0
.,lei
2. 3047 Prairie Avenue; 3737 Prairie Avenue; 4137 N Meridian Avenue:
Missing green striping through the intersection and faded in multiple locations.
• r
cm!, •.202a4al' ,--,,,A -� '. _".`.;' i.�g [ r( -� r t ini"gii: ..c J'Lt- -i-.
, 3047 P r .3 `� 1' i !'b p7-.1 c t l 4r.„<a Lr
- • Warn:Beath 0 0 �'�t. ,, f4 - y-�r - I" N1-6 Sl!
L"Cd fi iL rJ �1 i , - - ^� �-i� _
�J \ l
1.i.� Y •a 1 -mot.i f ' , I lriY♦
�Lt{
k t
, .i *�tea- ' �, -� R6' '
3. 4491 Royal Palm Avenue; 889 W 47 Street:
Tree roots are exposed and causing a hazard for bicyclists. Damaged pavement and
creating bumps in the bicycle lane. y
iv., + t. a 1 I"1 d �..M 1 'p _s !i i St `4•41 i 4 ( It 1 •, ' P�ht
tit 4 i 46- •.� it tt° ` 0.{ // ) 1' ‘. h, 1�. .'a.a spa t-
— ..
s r x , f _. Y.-' {fit -+* r a,
sue`,,3 '` J, ` .
_ @
. .
{ " a ;?
- It r • > -- •' y b. i h "'Z
1 Pr S
i.
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and play in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 318 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page I3
4. 859-891 W 47 Street; 4235 Prairie Avenue:
Asphalt cuts and bicycle lane was not restored
s-f ---
- , .33.32 PM I•
4 -lacy 28,202 t 4.48- •
P A a Pm
a '
^� a�th 5t F ..W IA_
A i' -33t 0
�{ gyt,Ft 11J+8 t 't ` !'; F 140 }'f p
_ . ,AkcaM ;f �* ! tel l•' It st Slams
' • - - -' NpU
.. • �if `y-.l , ...�(_• //ti .f p..dam' 7
".11
Ti -
•
it
L .; �,
1_ I
-I
. t - Niil " -.^-. .... 7 ,,e""- '•. _ ..,,
5. 2915 Prairie Avenue—3047 Prairie Avenue
Green striping is missing or faded in multiple sections of the bike lane, with some areas
potentially damaged or paved over by a contractor.
r.4��.>r fir, t�1:71:'1� _ _.... _ �'aj�1% 0:54y % _ CyYy25 v4.(�y:'1303'
R PrerX Av 6 t', �I`r"'ti-,4 u 'tameA
;M•in .-a&h FL 33140 t�.l—t�,a i PE11. :,.11) �` ro ..Mw 1. FL 3314'
Ul�ited States y. - ll-'-,jt- - 4 i u:- 1i :' .States.
34 _ • . . .�y •13C. . I 4L « �j•
r
f " -
i t' .R rot , f7 , a � •
at ' - -e .r. . • J
-4x
r
}
ti 1 .firs . ; .. - , , 1
If*024 at 4t0a3PPM fi '- _ r 25,20 t 4'd PM r ..,_ d
�023 i ralrfe Ava 1 i ° P Ave - I t r 7` ` 4
• ` h.1 Be acheFLdSates j Mm ;1r .� `r• Y 41L., �t _'
` .ft ,.ted States y-+ IS 14,
_
_ _
i
:mot
. v. i v . ., ,41 :_, _ ,11 I " / ' f;(,1":,,,",-..„ " ___\-1,1-::611;;3::..-''''.--.;, ,r4,-., 14"A_,"". :—_-,------,.. -7" —17—"-',---- '""'""1
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and play in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 319 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page i 4
zL - -.
'
r i ' r t May 25. •:- d� •43 M. �i_• 1026:4: i}J S•rTnh. , y _; ia34 4'--
, jr -rm a _ u B , ra..e 3041 P. ,;T33140 MaruC.h 33%413, MtaraBeach #�1
'IrF Sieteu. x — .31n1 5t3.' > - United nfl 3
- ,. - - fi ..
""� 3 _ :�
f-''. _ .-_,:-,:. ,-, .,.:,. •,., -, -..,' / - -_,,,,, _ .-_:. , , ,• -*- L.:..„t.: • . ,-f,. . ,
-.4% -,:, , ' " ,40.4,;,.:
.. _, „..t.„_:
,.,
_ :, , ,
, ,
". 7
6. 3047 Prairie Avenue—3711 Prairie Avenue
The green striping through the bicycle lane is missing or faded in several locations,
possibly due to damage or being paved over by contractors. Additionally, there are
inconsistencies in the shade of green paint used in some areas.
•4., , _ r " T r —I.+.v,Jr: sa ?S 4 1yM s,ds1
►y
��-;, c fC.34est rga * .d.,z — .
tunes
,1 -2 Wit
,,.�' .`lit, t . 'S'c'` 1 - l
ice" r nt. r♦ I. 1' ?- ♦ T f - yy F
- �1 ter ` ' f 7
— s t '"
Ji1 - I -
_ f - —
t f. a r -..Y-308' _ s,f< ..; :w.c 26PM -
':rat AYYe-, .- - • :ne A� •tit p II
'y-,, 3737 Prbme:Ave
_.rJ•'EL93NA7' ir'""'y`y' 'i.each 6L 33140 i 'MI@m9 C'1r L33tdp
"'y' - ---Hied States �' ,. ' - .Unwed states -ti _ �1, Un
` , a .
i j S_ -
,tom.—. - -l .- _
-777 WO
E a tJ+ �%* ;:
'�
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and ploy in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 320 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miaml Beach
Page 15
7. 4293 Prairie Avenue
The green bicycle facility is faded due to age and wear from adjacent driveways, and the
asphalt is failing and splitting, causing a rut that eventually may be wide enough for
bicycle tires to become stuck inside of while riding, potentially causing an accident and
creating a liability for the City.
44,, u'' _ .t,.4,. :-.9.5.PAA
e s .ne A'e
_ ': 0.J - •. ?mi -r f,, 33440•.
_,; _ .Stat.,
s. , F f
F
- t,Y • a `.
4-,,-_ _ yy
{is6 � ,.
R . -'
i,- 1
3
t
3a
4
8. 7113 Dickens Avenue—7798 Dickens Avenue
Green striping in the bicycle lane is missing and faded in several areas. Water ponding issue.
C 7 ;y`.gi gY,C[ ‘ 10 'r_,tdrk°"` * 1 I r °1024.�112,56-.35 P f -- -i I^'
,`-� �+ `rc t"[[�Q,...xi ,s �-li• >t��', • •n 7229 Dickens Ave, -'�.�-.-_, '1.
- to PIutr rs.. G'h! v T -L r 1 7 C iX't;ff]..
spa. 4 aJ jM t��3ial old'I FL late1�
.>y .ar-V,�z.c>. Y �` f4- *+.t , Urviedaetates _,-„,,R eY.zr.y
>.• - , :t -.}yam} --
v'-
..
n
.-�-�t� - -
_ A .., roof . at -._.f._ ..Z.
.F ° . tal, `, t 's7 1 w�:,.�, 1'' 9t 125 35PM .F•1 ,-may' >_ y'
r it a 1.: `�k `9 O:ckcas Ave ". ,'S. r; •r i t J,
'4. ` t__r 7°'!miat>7•0e4 as 41 rc :rP. Ft,33ta1 * 11 fi:
1 < ' I - . '
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and play in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 321 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page I 6
.
rxk L258}gPM{ ,- -, 410§ W .;
. ,D•n35 Ave „ }3rJ' ' 1 Ate_
:� a -�fL3310i.. ati a '
14.d Steles •f- s�
•
= t
9. 700 78th Street
Green striping removed during contractor utility work; contractor is responsible for
restoring the original striping.
• - i cn oo Fi-7816-6 33ia1
trcleu
.::•
10. 555 W 31st Street
Green striping is missing or faded in multiple sections of the bicycle lane, and there are
inconsistencies in the shade of green paint used in some areas.
3G2Yc 1074Jof4 a44Pal
'.R' 66E'tm�
bl t= a
•
We ore committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and ploy in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 322 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page 17
11. 104 8th Street— 146 8th Street— 198 8th Street
Missing green striping through the bicycle lane and faded in multiple locations
.,,r 1.., T� ,' - . 5755 PM • t ^?•.262024a71580d PM'
F • -, 4 isrows tt }
- 4" :.{
, ,,,_
i:„..___„..______.=, ,, _, ,
.,_ ... _ __
_ _ . . . .......„--
..._ ., , ...„........__. •._ 41" -..;- , ' . -''' ' i '/ ' 1 \ .
is 1Ai 4 w , �A �
! a- ` ' 1
12. 4461-4578 Royal Palm Avenue
Royal Palm Avenue east and west bike lane pair has significant fading throughout, with
several different instances of failing asphalt, construction work not restored properly,
overgrown grass/soil in the bike lane, and general but significant faded green pavement
markings throughout due to age and wear from the many driveways that traverse this
bike lane.
`, : 3y - , '.tiv yP6.Iil° -'11- . y 1a,2•2 't102 A t '.'::"3
'Wirt PaarAYp 4 '+`•, S s nve �
a r1. 'I- - Beath FI.33140 - ,ch EL3,314,1 ,. �i - maim., ,3,31,'+4ty.
i.� ' Unfted st3ta; fir ..- 1. ' - urcted Stases k1_l� }; ,Ixtqatir n tit
% {. �*' ,mat
i i - i
l
, ___ , . . „..4.- : _ •• ----.; -
‘.,..41,---:-..;7,v,1:k .1 .'* ,;3j. ' V- • Ir .. ,
i /. , .3 /•I - ' _ <, a ;; Q' , 2d 77P
' . Y-. '� It �,P Im5A 4, - ' •3. - .�, 4..,... �" t J i•549 Pa1mAve
/� 'i1•ti.. '^, mL3 e . ,' .<', f 3e8chCL33140
> t i',- ,tes -' - t,United States
`'� •- - -
- a=: • -_ .mow tS
< .. ---
I} c- ,wd I c :a Y �. t ,
` 'I =
4' I '--, .
i '' c -
•
� • t - s
We ore committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and play in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 323 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page 18
- ,
' -S May Z0, 4.104 5Z', ' -- t" ' 2024 :p s - ,,..r . 4 27 34 PM'
' A flapat P t 1 ! ,, •. t. 9; - .�'w+- 1 Patm Ave
-,r Y l� _ ` _ t 5..1 +d1 y.y,.rL. i Z:'J ft331
4.
-6..-A .,:...i. -. 'N....! I .. 4 _ 4 i': '-.: '.4-Tr...... ._ ._ ___ :4,4:„,....,.:•``4,..7.,.._..*,,
CI
if'....,.. '
_-p gi t! ij
3 • `- y �•
iti �� y• •E'
ir'
ryii _
R.-
` May 20't4 at 4,Z9•iePM--
f , ,.-A S ire'Pati,+P y
s M,3m,8eaahF 314O
-un:ed Statag"
f y- C P4Fv f
^4•. %-/
.
•r _ ' 1 e
y s:..--- im -
--1
13. 353-359 W 47th Street
This bike facility suffers from overgrown grass and soil, faded markings due to cars
traversing into private parking lots, fading due to age, and missing sections within the
lane due to construction work not restored pro•eri
I �. r',W - ' .
Y r 51 List -�J Y 76
-
a I. untd,4wr;%'_. -
*".".":";_joelajyt;CD n'=+.. �..
6
`, , t r ;
ilk
4
' f J A
We ore committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and play in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 324 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page i 9
14. 1040-1073 W 47th Street
Portions of the bike lane are faded due to age, portions are missing due to construction
work not restored properly, and portions have failing asphalt that has created potholes
within the bike lane.
, L - wy.t: ,.a at 4 •3 rr , May 2� m ,v ,. tx jr t4r�' . 1
Pr yriit: ions-tisw22ei - -sac hr 8t -2 t . i.a {, .
C ',r. i t Beach F t j - JACim1'aedrhEr., f •r �,,
s,,..,„ .,,,,
,,,.. .4.,:k.ifi, 1'41 1 '1'&44"' :44, ...--4.?,-,' . -Q%., 1,17--, _-''''
-,,,, - --.. ...-....,.-0 L
e ��++
y�.
1 i'— M
, -, _,7
_. , ...:_;1,,.....,..v.
,.., 1 A. .,: ..'.,f -% ' ' .---_-_ ,
O
:..i„,... . „....:,.. , . 5 :•441"-IA -I.? ". •''-•r_; -
-' ._ .--. I ,W 47o+s:-
& M aps Bsnci171.33140
. -- 4,
�"ilk* rq
•
4 fir
ir•
r / .
•.• ilrikV
15. 4137-4165 N Meridian Avenue
Bicycle lane not restored properly, and the asphalt is missing at the edge causing
tripping hazard. The bicycle lane restored south of the missing paint section has a
different width than the north side.
ser,ot,..0,- 1 ry -
Nr^*:ti
- T `_ _ . r" .
_
•
5 t, v i
v_ ;I
qi t- _i
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,work,and ploy in our vibrant,tropical,
historic community.
Page 325 of 1157
Damaged Green Bicycle Lanes Analysis Throughout the City of Miami Beach
Page 110
16. 555 W 41st Street
A small but impactful pothole is created as the result of construction work not restored
properly.
_
t i'tf,
; ; s t , _ , i
3 , vu u,
'fl!-
Conclusion:
Transportation and Mobility staff recommend the assistance from other departments such as
Public Works and Greenspace to address the repairs needed prior to restriping the green
bicycle lanes. Transportation and Mobility staff will be able to reach out to one of the
rotational contractors the City of Miami Beach has a contract with to restripe the green
bicycle lanes. The contractors are using multiple types of green paint making our bicycle
lanes inconsistent. Transportation and Mobility staff recommend using the same paint
throughout the City.
We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live,wort and play in our vibrant, tropical,
historic community.
Page 326 of 1157
Green Bicycle Lanes Tracking Sheet
Transportation and Mobility Department
Location# PM Location/Address Type of Damage to Green Bicycle Lane Quantity(SF) Maintenance
Request Date
1 Grant 148-198 Sth Street Faded due to age 176
2 Grant 4469 Royal Palm Avenue Faded due to age 225
3 Grant 4461 Royal Palm Avenue Faded due to age 85
4 Grant 4469 Royal Palm Avenue(2) Faded duo to ago 70
5 Grant 4491 Royal Palm Avenue Faded due to age 260
6 Grant 4491 Royal Palm Avenue(2) Faded due to ago 260
7 Grant 4491 Royal Palm Avenue(3) Faded due to age 260
8 Grant 4491 Royal Palm Avenue(4) Faded due to age 260
9 Grant 4515 Royal Palm Avenue(1) Faded due to age 235
10 Grant 4511 Royal Palm Avenue(2) Faded due to age-driveway entrance 175
11 Grant 4540 Royal Palm Avenue Faded due to age-driveway entrance 175
12 Grant 4539 Royal Palm Avenue Faded due to ago 145
13 Grant 4578 Royal Palm Avenue Faded duo to age 480
, 14 Grant 4545 Royal Palm Anomie(1) Faded due to age 360
15 Grant 4545 Royal Palm Avenue(Crossbike Markings) Faded due to age 185
' 16 Grant 353 W 47th Street Not restored properly 605
17 Grant 359 W 47th Street Overgrown grass/soil 425
18 Grant 859 W 47th Street Not restored properly 100
19 Grant 901 W 47th Street Asphalt fading/driveway/age 425
20 Grant 889 W 47th Street(1) Was never painted greer/tm8 lines faded due to age 415
21 Grant 889 W 47th Street(2) Was never painted green/age/tree roots/asphalt failing 415
22 Grant 1073-1199 W 47th Street Not restored properly 55
23 Grant 1060 W 47th Street Other-driveway entrance 20
24 Grant 1049 W 47th Street(1) Asphalt farina/age 60
25 Grant 1040 W 4th Street(2) Asphalt faang/age 50
26 Grant 4137-4165 N Meridian Avenue Not rostored property 230
27 Grant 656 W 41st Street Not motored properly 15
28 Grant 4235 Prairie Avenue Not restored property 10
29 Grant 4293 Prairie Avenue Asphalt fa8ng/age/driveway entrance 225
30 Paola 315 W 47th Street Faded due to ago 48
31 Paola 1001 Ocean Dr Faded due to age/Asphalt failing Not restored
1.086
ProWdY
32 Paola 1001 Ocean Dr Faded da a to age 2,260
33 Paola 940 Ocean Or Faded due to age f Not restored properly 330
34 Paola 873 Ocean Dr/800 Ocean Dr Faded due to age 7.970
35 Paola 200-298 South Pointe Dr Faded duo to age 1,480
36 Paola 141 Alton Rd Faded due to ago 2,050
37 Paola 172-244 Alton Rd Faded due to age 350
38 Paola 172-244 Alton Rd Faded due to age 1,566
Page 327 of 1157
•
Green Bicycle Lanes Tracking Sheet
Transportation and Mobility Department
of Damage to Green Bicycle Lane Quantity(SF) Maintenance
# FM LocatioNAddtesa Type g cY Request Date
39 Paola 900.950 5t1 St(5 St FOOT Road) Faded doe to age 200
40 Paola 135 Ocean Dr f 121 Ocean Dr Faded due to age 1,100
41 Paola 103 Ocean Dr Faded due to ego 3,070
42 Paola 121 Ocean Dr Faded due to age 1,040 .
43 Facia 161 Ocean Dr Faded due to age 150
44 Peda 43816d15trae7 Faded duet;age 7 Not stoned pcyody/Avant 1,815
fang.
45 PmW 436 1601 5tmat Faded due to age 1.342
48 Paola 1001-10991e St dophattfarm 400
47 Pada 1575 Alan Rd Faded due to age 1 Aepna7 foitot 2.300
48 Poole 1838Mal4Wan Ake Fadeddsato eau 18
49 Pade 2600 Protto Ave Faded due to age 26
50 Peale 2801 Pmko Ave Fdddueto ego 385
61 Palo 2801 Prate Ave Faded due to ago 765
52 Paola 2838 PraYmAv. Faded clue to age 239
53 Pool. 2839 Praia.AveFadedduo to age/Nat restord properly!Asphalt 1,214
265.2.
54 Pane 2345 Prairie Ave Faded due to ago 300
55 P8018 2905 Preme Ave Fdad due tU age 1.230
56 Fre8dn 2915Pmth Aver.. Faded due to ago 303
67 Franklin 2925 Praha Avenue Faded due to age 280
68 Framer 3001 Prairie Avenue Faded duaalage 350
69 Frenkhn 3023 Frain:.Avenue Faded duo to age 400
60 Fnsnkrn 3047 Ptak%Avenue Faded dire to agaattd Con8Ouctsn work 570
61 Franklin 3165 Preirle Awns Faded due to age 160
62 Frarnfn 3175 Prairie Averse Faded due toe0a 375
63 Franklin 3711 Prairie Avers Faded due to age and Memel stdes of green 260 .
64 Rankin 3737 Prato Awns Faded mete we 60
65 Franklin 7700-7798 Dickens Avenue Faded duo to age end Construct/on recd. 75
55 Fnankfn 7201-7299 DIckme Avams Faded due to age 125
67 Frank.+ 7141 Dickens Avenue Faded due to age and porting 1.670
68 Fmnkttl 7270 Octane Avarua Faded due to age end pomfng 550
69 Franklin 7113-7125 Dlckena Avenue Faded due to age 1.055
70 Frankn 70078tf1Sowt Cens.NucCon avir 50
71 Frenkrn 555W 3152 Street Faded duo to age 250
72 Franklin 104-1465a1 Street Faded due to age 6
Total Area 46,496
Page 328 of 1157