Tranportation ElementCity of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOTable of Contents
TASK 2: REVIEW PLANS AND POLICIES
2.1 Existing Comprehensive Plan And Relationship With Transportation Needs 1
and Land Development
2.2 Previous Transortation Planning Reports 2
2.3 Proposed Improvements of the Roadway System 14
2.4 Existing Design Standards 18
2.5 Funding Sources for Local Projects 19
2.6 Land Use Policies and Regulations 21
2.7 State and Regional Policies affecting the Transportation Element 22
Appendix A ¥Project Banks Maps
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 1 Task 2: Review Plans and Policies
2.1 Existing Comprehensive Plan and Relationship with
Transportation Needs and Land Development
The existing approved Comprehensive Plan includes three different elements that deal with
Transportation as follows: 1) a Traffic Circulation Element which includes the concurrency
management areas and levels of service for roadways within the TCMAs, 2) a Mass Transit Element,
and 3) a Port, Aviation and Related Facilities Element. Other elements in the Comprehensive Plan
that relate to transportation needs and land development are the Future Land Use Element, the
Capital Improvements Element and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
During this update to the Transportation Element, the three different elements that deal with
transportation will be combined into a single Transportation Element, pursuant to the provisions
included in rule 9J-5.005 of the Florida Administrative Code and Chapter 163 of the Florida
Statutes. In other words, it will address all modes of transportation and support the Com Plan.
The Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) completed in June 2007 deals with the relationship
between transportation and land use through the identification of its major issues: a) Traffic
Congestion: mainly describing the person/vehicle travel and the entertainment destinations in
Miami Beach as the main causes for traffic congestion in the City. The EAR recognizes the need to
evaluate the policies in the Comprehensive Plan that support amenities that attract the use of
alternative modes of transportation, such as transit, pedestrian and bicycle, transportation and land
use needs to be coordinated more closely in order to ameliorate traffic congestion; b)
Bicycle/Pedestrian Issues: the general perception of residents is that there is insufficient facilities for
pedestrians and bicyclists to navigate through the system in a safe and efficient manner, that more
shaded and protected sidewalks, shared use paths and bicycle lanes are necessary. The EAR
recognizes the need to coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department’s Greenways and
Parks Plan; c) Over-Development: the public has expressed disapproval due to high-density
development being approved. The EAR recommends a review of concurrency management,
transportation policies, future land use element innovative development, capital improvement
program element, and other policies.
The results of the growth management initiative which was in study during the development of the
EAR will be part of the input to the revised Transportation Element to address the issues identified in
the EAR.
To provide some background, the GGrowth Management Initative initiated constitutional
amendment, if passed by the voters, would allow Floridians to call for voter approval of changes to
local growth management plans if 10% of the voters in the city or county sign a petition calling for
such a referendum. Under current law, county and city governments may vote to change their
comprehensive plans. The Florida Hometown Democracy Amendment, if approved, would amend
the Florida Constitution to require that when a county or city wants to change its comprehensive
plan, each such change must be placed on the ballot in the form of a referenda for the voters to
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 2choose. The Growth Management Initiative would require that proponents of such a referendum
collect signatures of 10% of voters in the city of county on petitions before such a referendum would
be required. And petitions could only be signed at the county supervisor of elections office.
The data in the existing Comprehensive Plan will be updated, including that in the Concurrency
Management Areas. We are aware that new corridors were developed and redeveloped as a result
of growth in the City. Therefore, the Concurrency Management Areas will be reviewed as part of this
exercise.
The City has reviewed their policies and implementation measures through the EAR, where
monitoring tools were found in place and ongoing or under review. Monitoring tools will be
updated to support the objectives and policies in the Transportation Element.
A few policies including studies that have been implemented, will be reviewed for their concurrence.
Current and programmed studies will be monitored and included in the reviewed Transportation
Element.
Policies for Intergovernmental Coordination will be updated, both, in the Transportation Element,
and in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. Proposed projects to mitigate the LOS needs in
the transportation network will be cross-referenced with the Capital Improvement Element and
coordinated with City Staff.
2.2 Previous Transportation Planning Reports
Over the past decade there have been numerous studies and projects that have been performed to
help study and improve all forms of mobility in and around the City of Miami Beach. Some of these
studies were very specific to either a location or to a certain type of mobility while other studies
looked at a broader spectrum of movement as well as a large geographical area. The results of
these studies have developed the transportation network that exists today within the City of Miami
Beach and it will likely continue to shape the network for years to come. Reviews of some of the
projects with major impact from the past decade are mentioned below.
Coastal Communities Transportation Management Plan
The City of Miami Beach, in a
joint effort with its neighboring
coastal communities in
northeastern Miami-Dade
County (City of Aventura, City
of Sunny Isles Beach, Town of
Bal Harbour Village, Town of
Bay Harbor Islands, Town of
Surfside, Town of Golden
Beach and City of North Bay
Village) developed a
transportation master plan that
assesses the traffic and
transportation issues on the
barrier islands. The goal of
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 3this plan was to produce short, mid, and long term multi-modal solutions to transportation issues,
on a sub-regional basis.
This effort strived to set an example as a targeted sub-regional attempt at transportation planning
which is multi-modal in nature. Issues arrived at through accepted methodologies were supported
by an extensive public involvement process. The study portrayed existing conditions and provided a
picture of the origin and destination of traffic affecting the coastal communities. It made
recommendations which focused coordinated multimodal improvements, as well as promoted the
viability of routes for commuters traveling from the barrier islands throughout the greater Miami
area.
The first step of this project was to begin to track the trips of the vehicles coming into or out of
Miami Beach. This was completed by filming the license plates of all traffic and tracking it through
whatever screen point they crossed. This allowed a great amount of data to be developed and
analyzed. By analyzing this data, close to 50 potential projects were developed that would further
improve transportation within Miami Beach and all of the coastal communities.
View of Cameras for data recording
After an analysis of the data several conclusions were made relative to travel behavior on the
Coastal Communities. It is important to remember that this is a logical transportation system, and
therefore was relatively easy to study, because of its isolated nature with relatively few opportunities
for ingress or egress to the system. Travel within the system may not be related between zones. The
conclusions are as follows:
Sub-regional trip making in the study area is occurring but is not the primary cause of
congestion.
Drivers tend to enter or exit the system on the causeway closest to their beach origin or
destination.
East/West movement is the most prevalent.
Traffic is a product of the existing density, diverse land uses, and a well balanced economy.
The roadway network is mature.
The vast majority of the traffic originates internal to the study area.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 4Coastal Communities Transit Study
This project was completed in conjunction with the Coastal Communities Transportation Master
Plan. The goal of this study was to analyze existing transit service in the coastal community’s area.
This study attempted to see how existing service could be streamlined to help improve service for
riders, to improve operational efficiency and reduce transit impact on other traffic. This report also
identified locations for major transfer hubs.
There are a total of 14 bus routes from MDT that service the coastal communities. These routes are
as follow; A, C, E, G, H, J, K, L, M, R, S, T, V and the South Beach local. Of these 14
routes, 10 have duplication along A1A and Collins Avenue. To help
become more efficient, this report proposes to combine some of
these routes, truncate East-West routes at A1A and create express
routes along the A1A corridor. The benefits to doing this would be: it
would contain easier to understand route structure; frequent service
on a single route and therefore no need for passenger schedules;
easier to fine tune schedules to reduce bunching and have better on-
time performance; better operational efficiency and bus utilization,
and this would all be done while still supporting all long term transit
plans for the area.
The best way to implement a plan of this nature would be to phase
changes over time to minimize impact, and provide feedback. It
would also be important to measure the possible impact of changes
on existing riders and current ridership as a whole.
Phase I 1 - 3 year horizon
R Only the most fundamental route restructuring
changes
R Implement A1A Corridor local and express routes with existing bus resources
R Implement circulators to complement A1A Corridor Route
R No additional capital – only existing vehicle and capital resources
Phase II 3 – 5+ year horizon
R Implement minor East-West Route changes
R Initial Capital Improvements:
BRT Roadway Improvements – no major ROW requirements
Station development for Phase II and Phase III route changes
Phase III 5+ year horizon
R Implement East-West Route changes if contemporarily justifiable
R Implement BRT Roadway Improvements that use dedicated ROW if justified
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 5Miami Beach Transportation Concurrency Management Areas
The City of Miami Beach has established three Transportation Concurrency Management Areas
(TCMAs) as prescribed by Rule 9J-5.0055(5), Florida Administrative Code. A TCMA is a
coordinated approach to land use and transportation development, by utilizing an area-wide level
of service standard for designated land areas, instead of a level of service standard for specific,
independent facilities. This enables Miami Beach to manage transportation level of service within
sub-districts of the City to support more efficient mobility alternatives, including public transit.
Miami Beach is an intense urban area that is
under continuous pressure to handle the
impacts of its transportation needs. Located
in Eastern Miami-Dade County it is a densely
populated city with 18.7 square miles in
area and almost 90,000 residents.1 The City
must continue to provide and maintain
effective and efficient mobility to its citizens
and to the citizens of Miami-Dade County
who may move through Miami Beach as
their mobility needs dictate. In this way, the
City may continue as an important link in the
regional transportation system.
Miami Beach is a mature city, which has
been redeveloping at a fast pace in both
commercial and residential areas. It also
boasts one of the largest employment bases
in Miami-Dade County. This combination of
increased population and employment has
led to increased roadway congestion.
Miami Beach tracks its concurrency very
closely using its automated Concurrency
Management System.Recent redevelopment
activities have been slowed due to lack of capacity in various areas of the City.,WLVWKH&LW\·VGHVLUH
to continue efficient and effective development and redevelopment by utilizing its TCMAs.
7KH 7&0$·V DOVR DVVLVWV 0LDPL %HDFK LQ SURFHVVLQJ VPDOO ODQG XVH FKDQJHV DV VPDOO -scale
amendments, which, by statute, allow up to 120 acres cumulatively, per calendar year, to be
submitted as small-scale amendments, as opposed to 80 acres for non-urban infill designations, as
is currently the case.
The TCMAs data will be reviewed and updated concurrently with the development of the
Transportation Element.Additionally, the links within the transportation network will be updated.
1 US Census Data
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 6Bay Link
In November 2002, Miami-Dade County residents approved a ½-penny sales tax to fund various
innovative public transportation upgrades and additions. One of the major proposed new rail lines
was Bay Link, a 19-mile streetcar system that would link the City of Miami with Miami Beach via the
MacArthur Causeway.
Bay Link was planned as an integrated seamless system with the tracks of the proposed City of
0LDPLVWUHHWFDUXQLWLQJ0LDPL·VGHQVHVWUHVLGHQWLDODQGFRPPHUFLDOFHQWHUV7K e expected cost of
the project was $500 million, half of which was programmed to come from federal funding and the
rest split between local and state sources. With 43 stations and three distinct routes, the system was
projected to generate more than 20,000 daily passenger trips. Elevated guide ways on Watson
,VODQG ZRXOG HQVXUH WKDW WKH VWUHHWFDU ZRXOG FRQQHFW ZLWK -XQJOH ,VODQG WKH 0LDPL &KLOGUHQ·V
Museum, and proposed Shangri-la Hotel, while bypassing the causeway traffic and proposed port
tunnel entrance.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 7A transit alternative across the Bay could be a vital asset to Miami-Dade County residents and
visitors because of the direct and easy access it would create the counties largest economic engine.
Recent transportation studies, such as the ones documented in this chapter, show that Miami Beach
will soon be reaching a critical point with vehicle congestion, a period where traffic will begin to
erode the economic strength of our densest urban region. By creating a reasonable alternative,
which brings about land use changes the City of Miami Beach could be an option for the nearly 50
percent of residents who do not depend on a vehicle for daily transportation needs as well as the
millions of annual visitors.
Miami Beach Municipal Mobility Plan
The Miami Beach Municipal Mobility Plan (MMP) is
one of the first ´JUDVVURRWVµ HIIRUWV IRU D PDVWHU
SODQRIDFRPPXQLW\·VWUDQVSRUWDWLRQQHHGV in this
county. It provided a snapshot of future
transportation issues and trends which will impact
Miami Beach. The MMP established WKH FLW\·V
vision for transportation, made recommendations
for meeting the identified needs, provided a project
bank, and established the planning tools for
guiding on-going decisions related to mobility. The
project bank included projects that were
recommended to address current issues as well as
develop strategies that would help shape the future
of the city. It also produced a comprehensive
approach toward the issue of transportation by
addressing the needs for all types of mobility
including automobiles, transit, pedestrians, bicycles
and other non-motorized vehicles.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 8The projects identified were prioritized according to short-, mid-, and long-term horizons. Each
project was additionally prioritized according to whether its primary function was safety,correcting
an existing deficiency or capacity driven. Additionally, the projects were placed in categories
addressing capacity improvements, alternative modes of transportation, corridor beautification and
community sustainability.
Funding was explored anGWKH&LW\·V&DSLWDO,PSURYHPHQW3URJUDPZDVLQFRUSRUDWHGWRRUJDQL]H
each project. The sheets included description, justification, and estimates of each identified project
listing the year of proposed implementation.
Concurrency was addressed as well as traffic calming and options available on both issues were
discussed as to state and county requirements.
The City of Miami Beach Municipal Mobility Plan provided an organizational framework for the
project bank implementation. It listed the structure of the Transportation and Concurrency
Management including the primary duties and responsibilities of this division within the Miami
Beach Public Works Department.
6HFWLRQSURYLGHVDQXSGDWHWRWKHSURMHFWVLQWKH003ZKLFKDUHLQFOXGHGLQWKHFLW\·V&DSLWDO
Improvement Program.
Electrowave
The Electrowave was designed as a public transit system that was both eco-
friendly as well as energy efficient. The routes were designed to alleviate
traffic and targeted shoppers and tourists. The main idea was to transport
people from store to store so cars could remain parked in lots. Even the
colors were to be uniquely designed to give tourist the idea the little bus
would be fun to ride as well as handy.
With the closing of one of the major 5th street grocery stores, the elderly
population living in Rebecca Towers and other surrounding buildings needed
to take cabs or ride the county buses to get somewhere near the Publix on Dade Boulevard as many
RIWKHPQRORQJHUKDYHDFDURUDGULYHU·VOLFHQVH7KHFRXQW\ZRXOGQ ot let the City run the
expanded routes serviced by the county buses, so ridership and revenue would not be in
competition. Providing a service for tourists was also of major concern.
After determining the need, the City of Miami Beach decided to go ahead and start up its own
WUDQVLWURXWH7KLVZDVWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKH(OHFWURZDYH,WGLGQ·WODVWORQJWKLVZD\KRZHYHU7KH
City quickly realized that the costs and ridership were not nearly what they had anticipated. There
was also a large amount of delay due to the often broken down buses. It was at this point that the
county offered to take over the Electrowave under the following guidelines.
1. The County would get from the City, $1.1 million in annual support, (with 3 percent
increases annually)
2. The County would expand the route form 5 circular miles to 10 circular miles,
3. The County would assign 10 new buses exclusively to the South Beach route,
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 94. The drivers would be trained to be extra helpful and friendly to the frail elderly,
5. The buses would be painted and designed per the City colors and themes,
6. The County would repair and maintain the buses,
7. The City would set the fee rates charged to passengers (short falls from the tax revenues)
8. The electric buses would be replaced with more dependable low emission diesel engine
buses,
9. The new buses will have cameras to assure riders safety.
Miami Beach Intermodal Feasibility Study
The increased demand for the Electro-wave, an
electric shuttle system in Miami Beach, had
caused the City to look for a permanent facility to
maintain the vehicles and serve as a station. The
feasibility of two sites for this intermodal and
maintenance facility was examined. The
examination required several conceptual designs,
draft reports, and concluded with a color
brochure of the final option for distribution to the
public.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 10Ultimately, the study produced two possible locations for the intermodal centers to place within the
city. The locations were 17th street at Washington Avenue and Miami Beach Convention Center.
The two locations were also accompanied by schematic drawings and conceptual drawings as well
as layouts for the possible sites. The two schemes proposed addressed important civic issues and
urban issues relating to public space. The main terminal’s open plan would allow a destination
where passengers become as much of the attraction as the terminal itself. As a result the terminal
would serve dual roles as a public gathering space and as an intermodal transfer center that would
one day hopefully become a land mark for the city of Miami Beach.
17th Street & Washington Ave Site Convention Center / City Hall Site
Alton Road Traffic Calming Study
Alton Road is a state road under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT). The study area is Alton Road bounded by 63rd Street on the north and Michigan Avenue on
the south. The primary goal for this project was to select multiple forms of traffic calming devices
that would lower speeds, minimally affect the traffic volume and improve the general quality of life
in the area. This study was a collaborative effort between the City of Miami Beach, and FDOT, as
well as a large public involvement. This study was preformed as a recommendation from a previous
study that was completed by FDOT.
One of the primary findings in this study was that utilizing traffic calming devices at intersections was
not feasible. However, using a wide array of traffic calming devices throughout the corridor would
generally reach the objective. Therefore, this study recommended many forms of traffic calming
devices and also pointed out the best placement based on a ranking system for these devices. It
also noted that these devices are best utilized when placed at regular intervals.
The forms of traffic calming devices that are recommended by this study are as follow:
Speed Tables
Gateways
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 11Round-a-bouts
Neckdowns
Landscaping
Pedestrian Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Storage Bay for U-turn at Chase Ave
Forced Turn on Alton Southbound at I-195 Crossing
Signal Warrant Analysis
Intersection Consolidation at 63
rd Street & Allison
Left-Turn Restriction
Stop Signs
Traffic Circles combined with Neckdowns
Creating a Direct Access Ramp to Mt. Sinai from I-195
Signage
Semi-Diverter
Signal Timer
Enforcement
Weight Restrictions
Pedestrian Signal
These devices take consideration for the residents as well as the realities of the arterial streets in the
area. The report also points out that many of these devices affect drainage and therefore it should
be completely studied before implementation.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 12Alton Road Neighborhood Planning Study
The Alton Road Neighborhood Planning Study is being performed as a spin off of the Flamingo
Park Historic Districts westward expansion. The general purpose of this study is to analyze the
transitions between commercial and residential districts. The study is focused on identifying other
buildings in the study area with historical significance. Also being looked at as part of this study is
parking, pedestrian linkages, bicycle accessibility, transit ridership, traffic circulation, aesthetics and
commercial services.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 13North Beach Town Center Plan
The community of North Beach (63 rd Street to 87th Terrace and from Atlantic Ocean to Biscayne Bay) is
experiencing a new era in residential development. From the year 2000 on, projects approved,
permitted, under construction and completed add up to over 3,312 new housing units. Additionally,
there have been approximately 2,311 apartment units converted to condominiums since 2003.
As a greater number of residents with higher incomes move into the area, the commercial market
can be expected to respond with new businesses that offer services needed by the population. As the
DUHD·VUHYLWDOL]DWLRQFRQWLQXHVLW·VFRPPHUFLDOGLVWULFWVFDQDVVXPHWREHDEOHWRGUDZfrom a wider
geographic base, including not only North Beach, but residents from the communities of Middle
Beach, South Beach, Surfside, North Bay Village, Bal Harbour, Bay Harbor Islands as well as Miami
Shores, North Miami and northeast Miami along Biscayne Bay.
North Beach contains several clusters of commercial uses that total 745,785 square feet of existing
space. In order to develop coherent business marketing and recruitment plans, these clusters have been
categorized in a hierarchy of commercial district functions:
1. Town Center which serves the entire market area
2. Neighborhood Centers (Normandy Village, Ocean Terrace and Resort District)
3. Sub-neighborhood convenience districts
All North Beach commercial districts will experience growth from the rising population and income in
the residential areas. However, the Town Center will require some assistance and incentives to
develop according to the vision established by the community.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 142.3 Proposed Improvements to the Roadway System
Proposed Improvements to the roadway system come from four primary sources, these include the
Municipal Mobility Master Plan (MMP). Coastal Communities Transportation Master Plan, the
Coastal Communities Transit Master Plan and the Atlantic Greenway Network (AGN).
Overall there are about 60 planned projects stemming from these four sources. They are listed as
follows:
Coastal Community Transportation Master Plan:
Shorth Term - 0 to 5 Years
Number Project Mode Cost
1A Intermodal Feasibility Study Alt 120,000$
18A Intercept Parking Facilities Linked with Shuttles Alt 30,000$
21A Costal Communities Transit Development Plan Alt 40,000$
11A Pine Tree Dr. Bus Stop Locations Alt 330,000$
8A Bus Route Reorganization Alt 300,000$
12A Pedestrian Signals / Crosswalks Alt 55,000$
15A North / Middle / South Beach Circulators Alt 1,000,000$
2C Collins Avenue Corridor Study Corridor 80,000$
3C 41st Street Corridor Study Corridor 80,000$
1CA Causeway Flow Enhancements Capacity 60,000$
3CA One Way Residential Streets Capacity 50,000$
5CA Intersection LOS Improvements Capacity 450,000$
6CA On Demand Pedestrian Signals Capacity 30,000$
7CA On Street Parking Management Capacity 35,000$
9CA 63rd Street Travel Patterns Study Capacity 30,000$
3P Intelligent Transportation Systems Policy TBD
Mid Term - 0 to 10 Years
Number Project Mode Cost
9A Bus Priority Alt 55,000$
13A Bike/Ped/Transit Linkages Alt 45,000$
14A Free Transit Passes for City Employees Alt TBD
4C Collins/Harding One Way Pair Corridor 80,000$
1P Liaison with South Florida Commuter Services Policy TBD
4P Transportation Systems Mgmt / Demand Mgmt Policy TBD
5P Increased Enforcement Policy TBD
6P Parking Impact Fees Policy TBD
7P Residential Parking Requirements Policy TBD
9P Closely Monitor Transportation Capacities Policy TBD
10P Personal Mobility Devices Policy 5,000$
11P Shared Cars Policy 5,000$
12P Driver Behavior Campaign Policy 5,000$
13P Impact Fees to Transit Policy TBD
NA Transportation Trust Fund Policy TBD
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 15Long Term - 0 to 20 Years
Number Project Mode Cost
4A Cross Bay Rail Alternative Analysis Alt 1,500,000$
2A Enhanced Bus Marketing Alt 75,000$
3A Enhanced Bus Amenities Alt 75,000$
5A Support NE Corridor Alternative Analysis Alt NA
Coastal Communities Transit Plan :
Number Project Mode Cost
1 Phase I is for Non Capital Projects, Using Existing
Resources Alt NA
2 Implement AIA Corridor and Local Express Routes with
Existing Buse Resoureces Alt NA
3 Implement Circulators to Complement AIA Routes Alt NA
4 Routes S and T as Local Limited Stop Routes Alt NA
5 Delete Route K Alt NA
6 Reconfigure Route R to Service Middle Beach Via Pine Tree
Rd Alt NA
7 North Beach Local (Reconfigured from Rts R,K) Alt NA
8 Middle Beach Circualtor, (Reconfigured from Rts R,K) Alt NA
9 South Beach Local (Extended Rt W Alt NA
10 Connect Municipal Circulators Alt NA
Shorth Term - 0 to 5 Years
Number Project Mode Cost
12, (TS)Develop Transger Stations (Off Street, Bus Bays, Shelters,
ITS, Pre Payment, Retail and Mix-Use Components)Alt NA
13 Initial Capital Improvemnts of Bus Rapid Transit and Station
Development Alt NA
14 Implement East/West Routes When Transfer Stations are
Ready Alt NA
15 East/West Connectors (Truncate Rts G and H and move
assettes to Rts S and T)Alt NA
16 Rt J to 24 Hour Service Alt NA
17 Bus Rapid Transit along AIA Alt NA
Mid Term - 0 to 10 Years
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 16Number Project Mode Cost
18 East/West Changes to Routes G, H, L if Justifiable Alt NA
19
Implement Bus Rapid Transit where ROW is needed,
(Including Purchasing ROW, implementing Dedicated
Landsw, and Median and Sholder Transitway Projects)
Alt NA
20 (PR) Implement Park and Ride Stations Alt NA
Long Term - 0 to 20 Years
Atlantic Greenway Network:
Priority/Programming Number Project Mode Cost
Current 2008 1
Beach Walk II (Lummus to South
Pointe)Alt N/A
2 NBRC Alt N/A
Phase I, 2007-2012 3 MBRC (Eden Roc) Alt N/A
Phase II, 2013-2014 4 Alison Park - 41st Street Alt N/A
Phase III, 2014-TBD 5 44th Street - 23rd Street Alt N/A
Potential Phases, 2015 6 Fontainebleu Alt N/A
7 W Hotel Alt N/A
2009-2013 C/W North-South and East-West
Connections
To be constructed by
FDOT, County or City
Public Works or CIP
Department
TBD C/W System Wide (City Wide)
South, Middle and North Beach Neighborhood Bikeways
Beachwalks
Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Identified Needs within the Pedestrian and Bike Network
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 17Miami Beach Municipal Mobility Plan:
1. North Beach Community Shuttle Expansion
2. North Beach Neighborhood Cahning/Streetscape Improvements
3. Harding Avenue Enhancements
4. Biscayne Elementary School Circulation Improvements
5. Indian Creek Drive/71" Street/Dickens Avenue Intersection Improvements
6. Normandy Drive/71" Street Corridor Enhancements
7. Indian Creek Drive Capacity Improvements
8, North Beach Waterfront Access Improvements
9. Collins Avenue improvements/Regulation Program
10. North Beach Walk/Atlantic Trail/Greenwny
11. 63" Street/Indian Creek Drive Capacity improvements
12. Collins Avenue Realignment
13. La Gorce/Pine Tree Traffic Calming
14. Alton Road Enhancements
15. Middle Beach Walk/Atlantic Trail/Greenway
16.47" Street Traffic Calming/Safety Improvements
17. Nautilus Neighborhood Calming Project
18. Middle Beach Community Shuttle Expansion
19.43" Street/Alton Road Intersection Capacity Improvements
20. Middle Beach Intermodal Facility
21. Indian Creek Drive/41" Street Intersection Capacity Improvements
22. Alton Road/41" Street Intersection Calming
23.41' Street Streetscape
24. Alton Road Enhancements
25. Indian Creek Multi-Purpose Trail/Greenway
26. Dade Boulevard/23n3Street Intersection Alignment
27. Dade Boulevard Intersection Improvements
28. Alton Road at 20' Street and Sunset Drive at 20" Street Intersection Reconfiguration/Improvements
29. Alton Road/Dade Boulevard Intersection Improvements
31.17' Street/Alton Rood Intersection Improvements
33.10" Street Enhancements/Operational Improvements
34. Alton Road Capacity Improvements
35. Flamingo Park Neighborhood Calming Program
36. South Beach East/West One-Way Pairs
37. Washington Avenue Enhancements
38. 5' Street/Alton Road Intersection Improvements
39. East-West Transit Corridor
40. South Beach Intermodal Facility
41. South Beach Walk/Atlantic Trail/Greenfly
42. South Point Streetscape/Pedestrian Access Program
43. Ocean Drive Operational Improvements
44. Collins Avenue-Grand Boulevard
See appendix A for graphical versions of all 4 project banks.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 182.4 Existing Design Standards
Design Standards for the City’s transportation network are held in the City of Miami Beach, Public
Works Manual, Section 9, Part II: Roadways. The standards details issues related to:
Materials
Installation of Materials
Installation of Concrete
Installation of Asphalt
Installation of Pavers
Installation of Textured Pavement
Installation of Sidewalks
Installation of Ramps
Procedures
Bicycle Facilities
The Public Works Manual shows in Part II Section 9, Roadways, the design standards for roadway
construction and includes a sub-section for Bicycle Facilities. For cargo the City follows the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), FDOT and/or Miami-Dade County standards, where
applicable.
The manual provides a thorough overview of how to prepare the entire construction of a roadway
facility form the preparation, composition and installation of subsurface materials, including the
spreading and compacting of base materials, to the various components of the top surface and
jointing of a road facility. Most if not all of the standards conform to FDOT standards for similar
facilities. It discusses the use of Miami Beach Red as a color for pavers and pavement
pigmentation. It further elaborates on the ADA standards required on each facility. It asks that
bicycle facilities be considered on every project. The surface condition, width and location of
bicycle facilities are discussed. It elaborates on the implementation of bicycle routes. Requiring that
the routes must:
1. The route provides continuity to other bicycle facilties such as bike lanes or bike paths.
2. The road is a common route for bicyclists through a high demand corridor. The route
extends along local neighborhood streets and collectors that lead to an internal
neighborhood destination such as a park, school, or commercial district.
3. An effort has been made to adjust traffic control devices to give greater priority to bicyclists
on the route, as opposed to alternative streets.
4. Street parking has been removed or restricted in areas of critical width to provide improved
safety.
5. Wider curb lanes are provided compared to parallel roads.
Also discussed are signage, signalization, clear zones and pavement markings for all facilities.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 192.5 Funding Sources for Local Projects
There are several sources of funding for local projects. Most of this money stems from the
SAFETEA-LU federal transportation authorization of nearly $300 billion. These include Federal
Highway Priority Projects, Transportation Enhancement Program Grants, the Peoples Transportation
Plan, the Florida Department of Environmental Protections Office of Greenways and Trails
programs, FDOTS Highway Safety Grant Program, Concurrency Mitigation Funds and Road Impact
Fees. A bulleted description of each is provided below.
1.Federal Highway Priority Projects (FHPP):The High Priority Projects Program provides
designated funding for specific projects identified in SAFETEA-LU. Over 5,000 projects are
identified, each with a specified amount of funding over the 5 years of SAFETEA-LU.
These projects are funded by contract authority, and funds are available until expended.
These funds are obtained via the Congressional Appropriations process.
FHPP funds require a 20% local match.
Once earmarks are made, FDOT will manage the funds and project.
A LAP Agreement between City and FDOT has to be executed for project.
Contact: Kevin Crowder, Ext. 6186, no later than December/early January.
2.Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP)Grant :Transportation Enhancement (TE) activities
offer funding opportunities to help expand transportation choices and enhance the
transportation experience through 12 eligible TE activities related to surface transportation,
including pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and safety programs, scenic and historic highway
programs, landscaping and scenic beautification, historic preservation, and environmental
mitigation. TE projects must relate to surface transportation and must qualify under one or more
of the 12 eligible categories.
TEP is a small percentage of FHA’s Surface Transportation Program Fund
MPO receives grant applications by the spring of each year.
TEP may grant up to $1 million/year for a specific project, but no more than a combined $3
million in one year increments for the same project.
TEP funds require a minimum 10 percent local match.
Grant Contact: David Henderson, MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Specialist, at (305) 375-1735,
or davidh@miamidade.gov
After grant is awarded, FDOT manages the funds. LAP Agreement required.
3.Peoples’Transportation Plan (PTP):The Ordinance creating the half-percent transportation
surtax calls for 20 percent of surtax proceeds to be distributed directly to municipalities on a pro
rata basis for use on local transportation and transit projects. Municipalities must apply at least
20 percent of their share of surtax proceeds toward transit uses and must submit their
transportation plans to the County according to established deadlines.
The City receives approximately $2.7 million of these funds a year to be utilized at 20% for
transit (South Beach Local) and 80% for Transportation projects citywide.
Out of the 80% funds, a portion can be utilized for bicycle/pedestrian projects on, or
immediately adjacent to a roadway. Beach corridor bikeways do not qualify.
PTP funds are appropriated by City Commission for a specific project.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 20PTP funds require a 20 percent local match.
Contact: Nan Markowitz, Director, or Nestor Toledo, Municipal Liaison, Citizen’s
Independent Transportation Trust, (305) 375-1357.
June 1st is deadline since interlocal agreement was not signed with the City of Miami Beach.
Regularly boilerplate deadline is November 1st.
FDEP’s Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT):RTP is a competitive program which provides grants
for projects that provide, renovate or maintain recreational trails, trailhead and trailside facilities.
The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 included the National
Recreational Trails Fund Act (NRTFA) and established the National Recreational Trails
Funding Program (NRTFP).
The National Highway System Designation Act (NHS Act) of 1995 amended and revived the
NRTFA. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended the previous
legislation and provided for six years of funding. The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) replaced TEA-21.
Project proposals may address the following recreational trail interests:
1. Motorized Trails
2. Nonmotorized Trails
3. Mixed-Use projects (either motorized, nonmotorized or a combination of both)
Applicants must submit a completed RTP Grant Application, during the submission cycle of
March 17 – 31, 2008. Applications must be postmarked no later than March 31, 2008.
Applicants may submit only one application during the submission period.
Applications must involve only one project site.
Contact: Alexandra Weiss, (850) 245-2052, alexandra.weiss@dep.state.fl.us
Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) administers the program in
coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA).
The current maximum grant amount for mixed-use projects and non-motorized projects is
$250,000. The maximum grant award amount for motorized projects it is $592,000.
Matching must be provided, either 50:50, 60:40, 80:20. The more match provide, the
more points the project will receive.
4.FDOT Safety Office’s Highway Safety Grant Program (bicycle/pedestrian safety): The objective
of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Program is to promote conditions for safe and effective travel by
foot and bicycle in Florida. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Safety Office
provides policy, planning, technical, and funding expertise in consultation with other FDOT
offices and federal and local agencies. Safety Office staff coordinate development and
dissemination of information about walking and cycling safety. The Pedestrian-Bicycle Program
oversees the Florida School Crossing Guard Training Program, the Florida Traffic Safety
Education Program, and the Safe Routes to School Program. District Pedestrian and Bicycle
Coordinators and other District personnel assist with the pedestrian and bicycle aspects of
FDOT projects and activities in the seven FDOT Districts.
Requests for funding are accepted between January - March 31.
A request for funding must be submitted on the Highway Safety Concept Paper form
provided by the FDOT/Tallahassee.
Link to directions and form:
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 21http://www.dot.state.fl.us/safety/HighwaySafetyGrantProgram
5.River,Trails &Conservation A ssistance,Florida Field Office:It is the community assistance arm
of the National Park Service. RTCA staff provides technical assistance to community groups and
nonprofit organizations, community groups, tribes or tribal governments, and local, State, or
federal government agencies so they can conserve rivers, preserve open space, and develop
trails and greenways.
Contact: Jaime Doubek-Racine, (941) 330-8047 or www.ncrc.nps.gov/rtca/nri
Applications are due by August 1st for assistance beginning the following fiscal year
(October 1st through September 30th). Assistance is for one year, and may be renewed for
a second year upon request. Project selection is generally announced in early November
after passage of the federal budget.
Projects should include significant community involvement and outreach, and should also
include the commitment, cooperation, and cost-sharing of all partners.
RTCA does not provide financial assistance to support project implementation.
6.Concurrency Mitigation Funds
These funds can be used only for projects that increase capacity or mobility in the City.
Funds are divided into three (3) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) –
North, Middle, and South Beach TCMAs.
Funds are appropriated and approved by resolution of the City Commission for the
implementation of specific projects.
7.Road Impact Fees
The County collects Road Impact Fee (RIF) funds from developers. These funds are utilized
by the County on the RIF Districts where they have been collected.
Miami Beach and Fisher Island constitute RIF District 8.
All collected RIF funds are sent to the County which controls them.
The original purpose of the RIF program was to fund roadway and traffic projects RQURDGV
XQGHU&RXQW\MXULVGLFWLRQ, and traffic signal installation/maintenance everywhere. County is
also responsible for the span wire signals. Now all roads in Miami Beach qualify for RIF
funds.
2.6 Land Use Policies and Regulations
Land use and transportation are inextricably linked. Planning a transportation system without
coordination with land use policies severely impacts the ability of the system to function effectively.
The City of Miami Beach has always been progressive in dealing with planning of these two
important aspects of the community.
The Evaluation and Appraisal Report addresses the Future Land Use Element’s primary objectives of
Land Development Regulations, Concurrency Management and Intergovernmental Coordination.
Specific policies within these objectives relative to transportation include Land Development
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 22Regulation 1.2, which deals with implementing a new growth management program which will
address density. Two policies address down zoning areas of the community along Collins Avenue
and Indian Creek Drive. The down zoning has helped address hurricane evacuation. The
concurrency management objective has a policy which desires a review of the data and analysis
through the Transportation Element which should produce new policies for the system. The City
focuses on innovative land use development patterns and provides incentives for mixed use
development, which is integral to a well functioning transportation system. The City has been
successful in following its land use policies which have impacted the transportation system in a
positive manner.
The Code of the City of Miami Beach includes regulations pertaining to land use and transportation
as they relate to different zoning categories and planning areas within the City and support the
policies in the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 130 deals with off-street parking and Chapter 106
deals directly with Traffic and Vehicles. It is important to review Chapter 120 as it relates to
Concurrency and ensure that any updates to the Transportation Element will still be concurrent with
the Code.
The City is looking to ensure that pedestrian and bicycle issues are addressed with this current
update of the Comprehensive Plan. It is important to ensure that Chapter 98 will be reviewed
(Streets and Sidewalks) to support multi-modal choices on the transportation network.
During the initial planning strategies set forth through discussions with City Staff and the community,
we are aware that different neighborhood and commercial areas have specific transportation needs
that require special attention and policies to ensure the success of a successful regional
transportation system and at the same time ensure effective connectivity throughout the City. There
are certain Chapters in the Code that deal with these special areas: Chapter 142-336 Lincoln
Road, Chapter 142-361 Civic/Convention Center, and others as appropriate.
2.7 State and Regional Policies A ffecting the Transporta tion
Element
Miami-Dade County has a transportation element which is divided into five subelements: Traffic
Circulation, Mass Transit, Aviation, Port of Miami River and Port of Miami Master Plan. The City of
Miami Beach is affected by the policies included in the first two subelements: Traffic Circulation and
Mass Transit.
Objective TE-1: provides for an integrated multimodal transportation system enhancing the
Comprehensive Development Master Plan: The policies that support this objective deal with
intermodal connections and mass transit alternatives. Since the City will be evaluating the transit
system and intermodal centers established in the Multimodal Plan, these policies will be taken into
consideration.
Objective TE-2: By 2008 the County will enhance its transportation plans to accommodate safe
and convenient movement of pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles: The City of Miami-Beach will
address pedestrian and bicycle issues as identified in the EAR, and also it has regulated pedicabs as
per the Code of Ordinances. Alternatives modes will also be evaluated and consider the policies in
the CDMP.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 23Objective TE-3: deals with MPO coordination which will be relevant for Intergovernmental
Coordination policies. This includes the Transportation Monitoring Program which deals with the
coordination of the Concurrency Management Program with the County and the State.
The City of Miami Beach is included within the Urban Infill Area, which is defined as that part of the
County located east of, and including, SR 826 (Palmetto Expressway) and NW/SW 77 th Avenue,
excluding the area north of SR 826 and west of I-95, and the City of Islandia. The Urban Infill Area
was designated for urban infill development, urban redevelopment and public transit on November
1st, 2003 pursuant to Amendment 94-2 of the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development
Master Plan (CDMP).
The City of Miami Beach has also three Transportation Concurrency Management Areas as follows:
South Beach, Middle Beach and North Beach. The State will have general requirements on its
Strategic Intermodal System, roadways on the Florida Highway System, but will allow certain
exemptions for areas such as TCMAs.
State (FDOT) Requirements (Rule 14-94.003) and TCMA exemptions (F.A.C.
9J-5.0055)
Pursuant to Rule 14-94.003, the Department must be consulted as provided by Section
163.3180(5), (7), or (15), Florida Statutes, regarding level of service standards set on SIS or TRIP
facilities impacted by TCMAs, MMTDs, or TCEAs respectively, in order to set the Statewide
Minimum Level of Service Standards on the State Highway System, roadways on the Strategic
Intermodal System (SIS), roadways on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) and roadway
facilities funded in accordance with section 339.2819, florida statutes, the Transportation Regional
Incentive Program (TRIP), inside Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs).
7KH&LW\·V&RPprehensive Plan has set the Level of Service (LOS) as D and the CDMP has set the
/HYHORI6HUYLFHIRUWKH8UEDQ,QILOO$UHDDV/26(ZLWKWUDQVLWERQXVHV7KH&LW\·V/26FDQEHPRUH
stringent than that of the County or the State, but not less stringent.
The Level of Service Standards in Rule 14-94.003 have specific assumptions and restrictions that
ZLOOEHUHYLHZHGIRUFRQVLVWHQF\ZLWKWKH&LW\·V&RP3ODQDQGWKH&'03
Miami-Dade County CDMP
Miami-Dade County has adopted in the Transportation Element and the Capital Improvement
Elements minimum acceptable peak-period LOS for all State and County roads within the Urban
Infill Area as follows:
a) Where no public mass transit service exists, roadways shall operate at or above LOS E.
b) Where mass transit service having headways of 20 minutes or less is provided within ½ mile
distance, roadways shall operate at no greater than 120 percent of their capacity. This
means that the facility is allowed to operate with 20% additional traffic than with the
adopted LOS where no mass transit exists.
c) Where extraordinary transit service such as commuter rail or express bus service exists
parallel within ½ mile shall operate at no greater than 150 percent of their capacity. This
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 24means that the facility is allowed to operate with 50% additional traffic than with the
adopted LOS where no extraordinary transit exists.
Even though the CDMP has peak period provisions for facilities located within the Urban Infill Area,
the CDMP does make provisions to comply with section 163.3180 F.S. which are standards for SIS,
FIHS and Trip-Funded facilities.
Additionally, the CDMP in its Capital Improvement Element has incorporated minimum peak-hour
mass transit level of service within the Urban Development Boundary of the Land Use Plan map.
Provisions for mass transit service will be required where a combined resident and work force
population reach 10,000 persons per square mile or more with public transit service having a 30-
minute headway and an average route spacing of one mile provided that:
The average combined population and employment density along the corridor between the
existing transit network and area of expansion exceeds 4,000 people per square mile. The
corridor is 0.5 miles on either side of any necessary new routes or route extensions to the
area of expansion.
It is estimated there is sufficient demand to warrant service.
The service is economically feasible.
The expansion of transit service into new areas is not provided at a detriment to existing or
planned services in higher density areas with greater need.
Conclusion
The City of Miami Beach has experienced significant growth in many areas over the past decade.
However, the one area that has not grown is the latent capacity of its roadways. This has, in turn
caused severe traffic issues to arise. The projects listed in this chapter have not only helped solve
current issues, but they have also helped project and resolve issues that are likely to arise in the near
future.
These projects have identified both problems and solutions. These solutions include roadway
projects, transit projects, as well as policy projects. When implemented together and in the proper
order, they will help to mitigate traffic impacts in Miami Beach and raise the quality of life. When left
untreated, the issues of today will cause the gridlock of tomorrow.
In general, the City has prepared a series of studies, has undertaken capital projects and has
implemented ordinances and resolutions to address the transportation needs of the City as it grows
and develops. However, the Comprehensive Plan shall be updated to the current needs of the City
and support the current transportation network that is required under the current patterns of
development of the City. The recommendations of these studies will become official city policy as a
result of this Transportation Element.
Goals, objectives and policies shall be multimodal in nature, shall be updated to support the
current Land Development Regulation needs that the City has been handling, and also include the
level of intergovernmental coordination to ensure that projects can be implemented in a seamless
and effortless way from Capital Improvement Plan to reality.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOAppendix A ¥Project Banks Maps
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOTable of Contents
Task 3: Inventory Transportation Facilities
3.1 Introduction 1
3.2 Purpose 1
3.3 Existing Transportation System 1
3.4 Methodology for Service Volumes/Level of Service/Roadway Capacity 45
3.5 Capacity of Year 2008 Existing Roadway System 46
3.6 Existing Street Capacity Deficiencies 57
3.7 Existing Airports and Waterports 58
Appendicies 63
Appendix A ¥FDOT Generalized Tables
Appendix B ¥Traffic Data Collection Summary Tables
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 1CORRADINO
Task 3: Inventory Transportation Facilities
3.1 Introduction
The Transportation Element is developed to be consistent with the intent and specific requirements of
the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163
Florida Statutes, specifically, 163.3177(6) (j) F.S. and Rule 9J-5.019 which requires that the
transportation element be coordinated with the Long Range Transportation Plan of the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO).
The City of Miami Beach is a densely urbanized area with many modes of transportation available
within the city limits or in close proximity to city limits. These facilities include: major state roadways
providing regional mobility, local roadways enabling local access, a regional bus system providing
access to mass transit system and other destinations, one regional general aviation airport (Miami
International Airport), and water ports. This technical memorandum includes two main sections:
1. Existing Transportation System and Transportation Needs Analysis (Task 3)
2. System (2015 and 2030) and Future Transportation Needs Analysis (Task 4)
The reports for Task 3 and 4 include the following elements:
• An analysis of existing conditions: existing roadway systems, existing and remaining capacity,
existing pedestrian and bicycle system.
• An analysis of existing rail lines and mass transit facilities, airports and water ports.
• Growth trends and travel patterns.
• An analysis of the capital improvements planned for the City.
• Projected transportation level of service and assessment of future needs.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 2CORRADINO 3.2 Purpose
Existing conditions analysis includes descriptive narratives and pictorial supplements that provides the
basis for analyzing existing transportation deficiencies and needs within the City. This task will provide
the basis for the data, inventory and analysis report for the Transportation Element for the City.
3.3 Existing Transportation System
The existing transportation system in the City consists of the existing roadway system, the pedestrian
network, bicycle facilities and transit system.
Rule 9J-5.0019 requires an analysis of the existing transportation facilities and an evaluation of the
existing system needs based on the existing conditions analysis, existing land uses and committed
developments in the area. For these purposes, all the transportation facilities were analyzed based on
collected data and information provided by the Miami-Dade MPO. This section contains the existing
conditions analysis and data collected. The following section will contain the level of service analysis.
Existing Roadway SystemExisting Roadway SystemExisting Roadway SystemExisting Roadway System
This section includes available information on the existing roadway network. It identifies the following
information for the transportation system:
• Jurisdiction;
• Functional classification;
• Right-of-way widths;
• Number of travel lanes;
• Posted speed limits;
• On-street parking;
• Pavement conditions;
Figure 1 shows the existing roadway system.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 3Figure Figure Figure Figure 1111 ---- Existing Roadway SystemExisting Roadway SystemExisting Roadway SystemExisting Roadway System
Source: City of Miami Beach (2008)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 4
EEEExisting Functional Classificationxisting Functional Classificationxisting Functional Classificationxisting Functional Classification
Functional classification is a method of classifying roads by the service they provide as part of the
overall highway system. Most travel involves movement through a network of roads. Functional
classification defines the nature of traveling within a network in a logical and efficient manner by
defining the role that any particular road or street should play in serving the flow of trips through the
entire highway network.
Roadways are formally classified by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) through a
statewide, cooperative process with county and local jurisdictions. This ongoing process, known as
Functional Classification, is used primarily to assign governmental responsibility for maintenance and
roadway improvement funding. In recent times, a host of additional FDOT policy definitions have also
been linked to the State’s functional classification system.
According to the FDOT functional classification system, roadways within urban areas are ranked in
hierarchical order as follows: State Principal Arterial, State Minor Arterial, County Minor Arterials,
County Urban Collectors and City (or local unincorporated area) Urban Collectors. While FDOT has
a very slightly different nomenclature for non-urban areas, this does not apply to the City of Miami
Beach, therefore, they are not part of this document.
The arterial system arterial system arterial system arterial system in general, provides the highest level of mobility at the highest speed for mostly
longer trips and travel. Arterial roadways can be broadly defined as those facilities which carry
relatively heavy volumes of traffic for activities such as shopping, employment and the movement of
goods and services. Arterial roadways provide for regional movement; for travel to destinations
outside the City; or for non-locally-oriented traffic to travel through Miami Beach to other destinations
within the region. The Interstate Highway System is an arterial network. Arterials generally have higher
design standards than other roads, often with multiple lanes and higher degree of access control.
The urbanurbanurbanurban arterial system arterial system arterial system arterial system is divided into principal and minor arterials. The urban principal arterial
system is the most important group. It includes Interstate highways, other freeways and expressways,
and other principal arterials. The urban principal arterial system serves the major centers of activity of a
metropolitan area, has the highest traffic volume corridors and the longest trip desires; and should
carry a high portion of the total urban area travel on a minimum of mileage. It carries most trips
entering and leaving urban areas, and it provides continuity for all rural arterials that intercept urban
boundaries.
The urban minor arterial system urban minor arterial system urban minor arterial system urban minor arterial system provides service for trips of moderate length and at a lower level of
mobility. They connect with urban principal arterial roads and rural collector routes. Examples in Miami
Beach would include 63rd Street, Alton Road, and Dade Blvd.
Collectors, Collectors, Collectors, Collectors, in general, provide a lower degree of mobility than arterials. Collector facilities serve an
intermediate function to collect/distribute traffic between regional arterial facilities and local roadways.
They are designed for travel at lower speeds and for shorter distances. Collectors are typically two-lane
roads that collect and distribute traffic from the arterial system. Collectors in Miami Beach are streets
such as Pine Tree, Washington, Meridian, West Ave, and 17th Street.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 5The urban collector system urban collector system urban collector system urban collector system provides traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods and
commercial and industrial areas. Unlike arterials, collector roads may penetrate residential
communities, distributing traffic from the arterials to the ultimate destination for many motorists. Urban
collectors also channel traffic from local streets onto the arterial system.
Local roads Local roads Local roads Local roads represent the largest element in the road network in terms of mileage. Local streets serve
as site-specific terminal routes for each end of a trip. For rural and urban areas, all public road
mileage below the collector system is considered local. Local roads provide basic access between
residential and commercial properties, connecting with higher order highways. A route meeting this
purpose would connect a home, work, or entertainment trip by connecting the final destination to the
roads serving longer trips. Examples of roads meeting the purposes described in this paragraph include
those located within a residential subdivision or a cluster of commercial buildings. Examples of Local
roads in Miami Beach are 29th Street, 7th Street, Cleveland, Daytonia, 51st Street and Bay Drive.
A review was conducted to determine the functional classification of the roads, number of through-
lanes, service volumes and corresponding directional, bi-directional and daily traffic volumes level of
service. Figure 2 shows the difference between arterial, collector and local roads.
Additionally, and due to the different planning areas included within the City of Miami Beach, the
functional classification system was tailored to the specific needs of the City. The different residential
and commercial areas were considered when classifying the transportation network. Figure 3 depicts
the cities functional classification for the transportation network.
Figure Figure Figure Figure 2222 –––– Urban Roadway DefinitionsUrban Roadway DefinitionsUrban Roadway DefinitionsUrban Roadway Definitions
Source: AASHTO, 2001
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 6Figure 3 - Federal Functional Classification
Source: Florida Department of Transportation (2008)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 7
Figure 4 depicts existing directional number of lanes for arterials and collectors within the City of
Miami Beach. This information is also shown in the Level of Service tables.
RoRoRoRoad Maintenance Responsibilityad Maintenance Responsibilityad Maintenance Responsibilityad Maintenance Responsibility
Jurisdictionally, state roads are within the State Highway System and are maintained by FDOT and
local roads are maintained by Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami Beach (Figure 5)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 8Figure 4 - Existing Roadway Lane Count
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 9Figure 5 Figure 5 Figure 5 Figure 5 –––– Roadway Maintenance Responsibility.Roadway Maintenance Responsibility.Roadway Maintenance Responsibility.Roadway Maintenance Responsibility.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 10Right-of-Way (ROW)
Review of apparently available right-of-way is depicted in Table 1Table 1Table 1Table 1. Review of table 1 reveals that the
right of way widths for roadways within the City of Miami Beach are between 50 and 130 feet.
Posted Speed Limit
Review of posted speed limits along roadway segments is shown in Table 1Table 1Table 1Table 1. Examination of table 1
shows that the posted speed limits are between 25mph and 35mph the majority being 35mph. see
figure 6 for a graphical depiction of the posted speed limits.
Parking Areas
On-street parking areas exist in association with public parking facilities. Table 1Table 1Table 1Table 1 illustrates the
percentage of roadway segments that have on-street parking. Based on the percentages reported in
table 1, most of the roadways allow for on street parking on both sides.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways
Non-motorized transportation facilities serve bicyclists and pedestrians. Table Table Table Table 1111 illustrates the
percentage of roadway segments that have sidewalks. It also shows that nearly all streets have
sidewalks.
Existing Roadway Pavement Types
The majority of the roadways in Miami Beach are constructed with asphalt (Figure 7). There is
decorative pavement located alongside the Miami Beach Beachwalk.
Existing Surface and Pavement Condition
Figure 8 shows pavement condition ratings for roads managed by the Florida Department of
Transportation and City of Miami Beach. A majority of the FDOT roads have a pavement condition
rating of 3 or higher. Local roads are rated on whether the pavement is in fair, good or poor condition.
Nearly half of the local roads are in the poor category.
The City has colored maps showing conditions and is currently updating them the first quarter of 2009.
In addition, the City is planning to start recording/implementing a pavement management program as
new streets are being paved by the GO Bond Program.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 11Figure 6 Figure 6 Figure 6 Figure 6 –––– Existing Roadway Posted SpeedExisting Roadway Posted SpeedExisting Roadway Posted SpeedExisting Roadway Posted Speed
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 12
Figure 7 Figure 7 Figure 7 Figure 7 ---- Existing Roadway Pavement TypesExisting Roadway Pavement TypesExisting Roadway Pavement TypesExisting Roadway Pavement Types
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 13Table 1 - Physical Roadway Inventory (ROW, Speed, Parking, Sidewalk, Lanes,
Jurisdiction, Function Class)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008 N/E S/W Existing Existing SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD 50' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR 50' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD 64' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV50' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD 65' 30 6% 0 100% 100% 4U CITY COLLECTORSB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV 80' 30 0 0 100% 100% 4U CITY COLLECTORSB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR 150' 35 0 0 100% 100% 6D STATE ARTERIALSB08 ALTON RD/SR 907 BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST 100' 30 17% 0 100% 100% 4D STATE ARTERIALSB09 ALTON RD/SR 907 5TH ST 11TH ST 95' 35 59% 70% 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALSB10 ALTON RD/SR 907 11TH ST 15TH ST 100' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALSB11 ALTON RD/SR 907 15TH ST DADE BLVD 100' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALSB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA 5TH ST 11TH ST 60' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U STATE ARTERIALSB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST 55' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U STATE COLLECTORSB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A 11TH ST 15TH ST 60' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U STATE ARTERIALSB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A 15TH ST 26TH ST 70' 35 2% 8% 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALSB16 DADE BLVDW SAN MARINO DALTON RD 75' 30 0 0 88% 88% 4U CITY ARTERIALSB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR 60' 30 0 0 100% 0 4U CITY ARTERIALSB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD 130' 50 0 0 0 0 6D STATE ARTERIALSB19 5TH ST/SR 41 ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD 150' 35 0 0 100% 100% 6D STATE ARTERIALSB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST 60' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD 70' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST 70' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST 60' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR 26' 30 0 0 0 0 2U CITY COLLECTORSB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST 100' 25 100% 100% 100% 100% 4D CITY COLLECTORSB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST 95' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 4D CITY COLLECTORSB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST 95' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 4D CITY COLLECTORSB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD 95' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 4U CITY COLLECTORSB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST 52' 30 100% 36% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORSB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD 58' 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORMB01 63RD ST ALTON RDINDIAN CREEK DR100' 30 0 0 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALMB02 ALTON RD/SR 907 DADE BLVD 41ST ST 100' 30 0 0 0 100% 4D STATE ARTERIALMB03 ALTON RD/SR 907 41ST ST 63RD ST 100' 30 Yes Yes 100% 100% 4D STATE ARTERIALMB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112 ALTON RDINDIAN CREEK DR85' 30 0 0 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALMB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A 26TH ST 44TH ST 70' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 3 STATE ARTERIALMB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR130' 35 18% 0 100% 100% 6D STATE ARTERIALMB07 LA GORCE DR 51ST ST 63RD ST 30' 30 0 0 100% 100% 2D CITY COLLECTORMB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST 95' 30 9% 100% 100% 10% 4D CITY COLLECTORMB09 PINETREE DR 51ST ST 63RD ST 30' 30 0 0 100% 0 2D CITY COLLECTORMB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST 43 30 9% 9% 30% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORMB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST 60' 30 25% 25% 100% 100% 2U CITY COLLECTORMB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST 65' 35 100% 0 100% 25% 2 STATE ARTERIALNB01 71 ST/SR 934 E BAY DR COLLINS AV 90' 30 16% 9% 100% 100% 4U STATE ARTERIALNB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A 71ST ST 87TH TER 60' 35 100% 100% 52% 88% 3 STATE ARTERIALNB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1AINDIAN CREEK DR71ST ST 60' 35 0% 49% 100% 100% 3 STATE ARTERIALNB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A 71ST ST 87TH TER 60' 35 100% 100% 94% 92% 3 STATE ARTERIALNB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST 65' 35 35% 0 100% 100% 4D STATE ARTERIALNB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934 71ST ST BAY DR 75' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 3 STATE ARTERIALNB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR 75' 35 100% 100% 100% 100% 3 STATE ARTERIALJURISLANESFUNC CLASSSITESidewalkN/E S/WSEGMENTApproximate ROW WidthsSpeed Limit (MPH)On Street ParkingROADWAYFROM TO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 14Figure 8 Figure 8 Figure 8 Figure 8 ---- Existing Surface and Pavement ConditionsExisting Surface and Pavement ConditionsExisting Surface and Pavement ConditionsExisting Surface and Pavement Conditions
Source: Florida Department of Transportation (2008), City of Miami Beach (2008)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 15Existing Parking FacilitiesExisting Parking FacilitiesExisting Parking FacilitiesExisting Parking Facilities
A majority of parking facilities are located within close proximity to major trip generators, such as
public parks, theaters and shopping districts. The City of Miami Beach is very urbanized and there are
multiple transit generators and attractors within the City, such as Lincoln Road Pedestrian Mall, South
Beach shopping districts and beachfront parks. Table 3 details all of the off-street parking facilities
available in the City of Miami Beach. Figure 9 shows the existing off-street parking facilities within the
City of Miami Beach. In total, more than 9,700 off-street parking spaces are available in the City.
More than 5,000 public parking spaces are available in the South Beach area as a result of the
intensive activity that takes place daily there, making this service highly necessary.
TablTablTablTable e e e 3333 ---- Existing OffExisting OffExisting OffExisting Off----Street Parking FacilitiesStreet Parking FacilitiesStreet Parking FacilitiesStreet Parking Facilities
Parking FacilitiesParking FacilitiesParking FacilitiesParking Facilities LocationLocationLocationLocation SpacesSpacesSpacesSpaces
P1 South Pointe Park- Public Parking 215
P2 South Pointe Dr & Ocean Dr 62
P2 South Pointe Dr & Ocean Dr 149
P3 Washington & Commerce W-S 12
P4 100 Blk Washington Ave 30
P5 4th & Alton 23
P9 11th Street & Jefferson Ave 120
P10 15th Street & Michigan Ave(Softball Lot) 134
P11 6th Street & Meridian Ave 25
P12 9th Street & Washington Avenue 24
P13 10th Street & Wasshington Avenue 30
P14 6th Street & Collins Avnue 34
P15 1000 BLOCK Collins Avenue
nue 33
P16 13th Street & Collins Avenue W-S 55
P17 13th Street & Collins Avenue E-S 25
P18 Lincoln Lane S & Meridian 40
P19 Lincoln Lane S & Jefferson Avenue E-S 21
P20 Lincoln Lane S & Jefferson Avenue W-S 62
P21 Lincoln Lane S & Michigan Avenue 19
P22 Lincoln Lane S & Lenox Avenue 18
P23 16th Street & West Avenue 31
P24 17th Street & West Avenue (Epicure) 71
P25 Lincoln Lane N & Lenox Avenue W-S 86
P26 Lincoln Lane N & Lenox Avenue E-S 107
P27 Lincoln Lane N & Meridian Avenue 144
P28 Lincoln Lane N & Pennsylvania Avenue 195
P29 17th Street & Convention Center Drive 160
P32 18th Street & Meridian Avenue 886
P33 19th Street & Meridian Avenue (Holocaust) 26
P45 Purdy Boat Ramp 0
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 16Source: City of Miami Beach (2008)
Parking FacilitiesParking FacilitiesParking FacilitiesParking Facilities LocationLocationLocationLocation SpacesSpacesSpacesSpaces
P46 18th Streeet & Purdy Avenue 41
P47 1837 Bay Road 0
P48 21st Street & Park Avenue 15
P49 21st Street & Collins Avenue 202
P50 24th Strteet & Flamingo Drive 23
P51 23rd Street & Liberty Avenue E-S 20
P52 23rd Street & Liberty Avenue W-S 35
P55 27th Street & Collins Avenue 121
P56 34th Street & Collins Avenue 62
P57 35th Street & Collins Avenue 72
P58 40th Street & Royal Palm Avenue 43
P59 40th Street & Prairie Avenue 70
P60 40th Street & Chase Avenue 80
P61 41st Street & Alton Road 41
P62 42nd Street & Jefferson Avenue 30
P63 42nd Street & Royal Palm Avenue 194
P64 47th Street & Pine Tree Drive 17
P71 46th Street & Collins Avenue 426
P72 53rd Street & Collins Avenue 159
P80 71st Street & Byron Avenue 30
P81 64th Street & Collins Avenue 65
P82 65th Street & Indian Creek ( Marina) 52
P83 69th Street & Harding Avenue E-S 35
P84 71st Street & Harding Avenue W-S 51
P85 71st Street & Carlyle Avenue S-S 15
P86 71st Street & Bonita Drive S-S 34
P87 71st Street & Bay Drive S-S 35
P88 Normandy Drive & Rue Versialies 23
P89 Normandy Drive & Bay Road N-S 31
P90 71st Street & Bonita Drive N-S 18
P91 72nd Street & Carlyle Avenue 51
P92 72nd Street & Collins Avenue 320
P93 73rd Street & Dickens Avenue 18
P106 75th Street & Collins Avenue 110
P107 79th Street & Collins Avenue 47
P108 80th Street & Collins Avenue 54
P109 83rd Street & Collins Avenue 105
P110 85rd Street & Abbott Avenue 12
P111 84th Street & Collins Avenue 65
P112 87th & Colline Avenue 15
G1 7th Street & Collins Avenue Garage 646
G2 12th Street & Drexel Avenue Garage 134
G3 13th Street & Collins Avenue Garage 286
G4 16th Street & Collins Avenue Garage 803
G5 17th Street & Meridian Court Garage 1460
G6 42nd Street & Sheridan Avenue Garage 620
Total 9623
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 17Figure Figure Figure Figure 9999 ---- Existing OffExisting OffExisting OffExisting Off----Street Parking FacilitiesStreet Parking FacilitiesStreet Parking FacilitiesStreet Parking Facilities
Source: City of Miami Beach (2008)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 18
Existing Evacuation RoutesExisting Evacuation RoutesExisting Evacuation RoutesExisting Evacuation Routes
The City of Miami Beach coordinates with the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management
related to issues regarding emergency evacuations. The Emergency Routes are depicted in Figure 10.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 19Figure 10 - Existing Evacuation Routes
Source: Miami Dade County (2008)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 20ExistingExistingExistingExisting MassMassMassMass Transit FacilitiesTransit FacilitiesTransit FacilitiesTransit Facilities
This section describes the existing transit services in the City and includes information such as location
of transit stations and ridership information. The responsibility for providing public transportation
service in Metropolitan Miami-Dade County resides mainly with the county government as specified in
Article 1, Section 1.01 A. 2., and 3., of the Metropolitan Miami-Dade County Home Rule Amendment
and Charter. Yet many local governments provide their own transit service in accordance with the
Peoples Transportation Plan as well as through local and FDOT grant funds. As part of the Miami-
Dade County urbanized area, the City of Miami Beach’s public transit system is planned, managed
and operated by Miami-Dade County through its transit agency, Miami-Dade Transit (MDT).
In 1960, the Dade County Commission passed an ordinance to create the Metropolitan Transit
Authority (MTA). Over the years and under various administrations, MTA evolved into the Metro-Dade
Transportation Administration, the Metro-Dade Transit Agency, the Miami-Dade Transit Agency, and is
now known simply as Miami-Dade Transit. Today's MDT has a viable four-mode system – Metrobus,
Metrorail, Metromover, and Paratransit – with nearly 360,000 daily boardings (June 2008 ridership).
In the mid-1960’s, the first transportation planning efforts were undertaken by Miami-Dade County.
Long-range proposals for major transportation elements, which included major expressway facilities
and mass transit service, were developed. These plans for mass transit service were further refined and
augmented, after public opposition to new expressways surfaced in the early 1970’s. This opposition
was validated in 1972 when the voters of Miami-Dade County approved the $132.5 million Decade of
Progress bond issue to provide the local share for public transit improvements. In 1974, a plan was
developed recommending an aggressive program of bus improvements and grade separated transit
facilities to accommodate travel demands in the future and provide a balanced public transportation
system.
MetrobusMetrobusMetrobusMetrobus
Metrobus is a multi-destination grid system that provides service throughout the county by providing
connections to the Metrorail and Tri Rail transit stations, connections to other routes, and to areas of
Miami-Dade County not served by Metrorail. The City of Miami Beach is served by more than 170
miles of bus service. Metrobus offers countywide service from the City to different parts of Miami-Dade
County. In June 2007, Metrobus had more than 265,000 average weekday boardings.
Local Bus CirculatorsLocal Bus CirculatorsLocal Bus CirculatorsLocal Bus Circulators
The City of Miami Beach, in collaboration with Miami Dade Transit (MDT), created a local bus
circulator to encourage transit ridership and increase the number of destinations that can be served by
public transportation. The City of Miami Beach’s bus service, known as the South Beach Local
Circulator was designed to easily connect riders with a number of popular destinations throughout the
South Miami Beach area including the Jackie Gleason Theatre, Lincoln Road Mall, FIU Wolfsonian
Museum, and other popular venues. The South Beach Local Circulator charges 25¢ per ride and
operates at 15 minute headways. It stops at MDT bus stop locations which allows passengers to
connect with MDT bus routes 51, 101, 103, 107, 108, 111, 112, 113, 118, 119, 236, and 246. It
also connects with municipal parking facilities. The City of Miami Beach recognized the need for a
similar circulator in the North Beach area. The North Beach Circulator is in the planning stages and
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 21may be implemented by mid-year 2009. Existing MDT bus routes serving the North Beach area may be
modified to create the North Beach Circulator.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 221.11.11.11.1 Existing Bus Routes and StopsExisting Bus Routes and StopsExisting Bus Routes and StopsExisting Bus Routes and Stops
Table 3 shows 15 existing bus routes, including the local South Beach Circulator, serving the City.
Table Table Table Table 3333 ---- Existing Bus RoutesExisting Bus RoutesExisting Bus RoutesExisting Bus Routes
RouteRouteRouteRoute Service AreaService AreaService AreaService Area
51 SW 137 Avenue and Coral Way, West Miami-Dade, West Flagler Street., Downtown
Bus Terminal, Govt. Center Metrorail station, Main Library, Historical Museum, Miami
Art Museum, Biscayne Boulevard., Omni Metromover Station and Bus Terminal
62 City of Hialeah, East 9 Street (NW 62 Street), Martin Luther King Jr. Metrorail Station,
Biscayne Boulevard, City of Miami Beach via Julia Tuttle Causeway (rush hours only),
Collins Avenue, Omni Bus Terminal, NE 14 Street and North Bayshore Drive
101 A NE 17 Terrace and Biscayne Boulevard, Omni Bus Terminal, City of Miami Beach via
Venetian Causeway, Lincoln Road, South Beach
103 B Downtown (Miami) Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida,
Miami Art Museum, Government Center Metrorail station, Omni Metromover Station
and Bus Terminal, City of Miami Beach via MacArthur Causeway, South Beach,
Washington Avenue., Lincoln Road., Collins Avenue., 41 Street., Alton Road., Mt.
Sinai Hospital
107 G NW 27 Avenueand163 Street, Bunche Park, Opa-locka, NW and NE 125 Street,
Broad Causeway, Bal Harbor, Collins Avenue, Miami Beach, Lincoln Road, 19 Street
and Convention Hall Drive
108 H City of North Miami Beach, Skylake Mall, The Mall at 163rd Street, Sunny Isles
Boulevard, City of Bal Harbour, Bal Harbour Shops, City of Miami Beach, Collins
Avenue, Lincoln Road Mall, South Beach, Rebecca Towers
110 J Douglas Road Metrorail station, City of Coral Gables, Miami International Airport, Tri-
Rail and Airport Station (overnight trips only), NW 36 Street., Allapattah Metrorail
station, City of Miami Beach, Collins Avenue.and72 Street.
111 K Omni Metromover Station and Bus Terminal, Downtown Bus Terminal, Federal
Building, MacArthur Causeway, South Beach, Washington Avenue, City of Miami
Beach, Haulover Marina, Winston Towers, Hallandale Beach Boulevard (Broward
County), Diplomat Mall (Broward County)
112 L Lincoln Road Mall, Miami Beach Convention Center, Miami Beach Senior High
School, 41 Street. and Indian Creek Drive., JFK Causeway, Northside Metrorail station,
Amtrak Terminal, Hialeah Metrorail station
113 M NW 19 Avenue.and20 Street., Civic Center Metrorail Station, University of Miami and
Jackson Memorial hospitals and clinics, Cedars Medical Center, VA Hospital, Omni
Metromover Station and Bus Terminal, MacArthur Causeway, City of Miami Beach,
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 23RouteRouteRouteRoute Service AreaService AreaService AreaService Area
South Beach, Lincoln Road., Collins Avenue.and41 Street., Mt. Sinai Hospital
118 R City of Miami Beach, Lincoln Road, Washington Avenue, Alton Road, Mt. Sinai
Hospital, Miami Heart Institute, Collins Avenue, 85 Street, Hawthorne Avenue
119 S Downtown (Miami) Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum, Miami Art
Museum, Government Center Metrorail Station, Omni Bus Terminal, MacArthur
Causeway, City of Miami Beach, South Beach, Lincoln Road, Collins Avenue, 192
Street Causeway, City of Aventura, Aventura Mall
120
Beach
Max
Downtown Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum, Miami Art Museum, Govt.
Center Metrorail station, Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, Omni Bus Terminal,
Julia Tuttle Causeway, City of Miami Beach, Collins Avenue, Surfside, City of Bal
Harbour, Haulover Park Marina
123
South
Beach
Local
South Miami Beach, Biscayne Street., Ziff Jewish Museum, Washington Avenue., Jackie
Gleason Theatre, 17 Street., City Hall, Meridian Avenue., Holocaust Memorial, Dade
Boulevard., Bay Road.and20 Street., Lincoln Road., West Avenue., So. Shore Hosp.,
Alton Road., Miami Beach Marina
246
Night
Owl
N. Miami Beach, Parkway Regional Medical Center, The Mall at 163rd Street, Sunny
Isles Causeway, Service Road from NE 26 Avenue to Interama Boulevard
(04and24and05), AIA and Collins Avenue, City of Bal Harbour, Surfside, City of
Miami Beach, Lincoln Road, Washington Avenue, MacArthur Causeway, Biscayne
Boulevard, Downtown Miami, Government Center Metrorail Station, Overtown, Civic
Center Metrorail Station, University of Miami and Jackson Memorial Hospitals and
Clinics, Allapattah Metrorail
Source: Miami-Dade County (2008)
The routes shown above provide designated stops, sometimes three or more per mile, while limited
stop lines make fewer than two stops per mile and at a greater speed.
The City has adopted D as its citywide level of service. This applies to where no public transit service
exists within ¼ mile. Where public transit exists, has headways of 20 minutes or less and operates
within ¼ mile distance, the acceptable level of service is D plus an additional 20 percent of D. Where
extraordinary public transit service exist such as rapid transit exist within ¼ mile, the acceptable level of
service is D plus an additional 50 percent of D.
The headways along these routes vary between 10 and 45 minutes. Figure 11 depicts the overall bus
routes. Table 5 shows the routes that serve the City with their respective headways, peak hour
headways, number of stops per mile and the roadways served.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 24Figure 11 Figure 11 Figure 11 Figure 11 ---- Route Serving Miami BeachRoute Serving Miami BeachRoute Serving Miami BeachRoute Serving Miami Beach
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 25TablTablTablTable e e e 4444 ---- MDT Routes, Headways, Ridership and Served Roadway SegmentsMDT Routes, Headways, Ridership and Served Roadway SegmentsMDT Routes, Headways, Ridership and Served Roadway SegmentsMDT Routes, Headways, Ridership and Served Roadway Segments
Weekdays Saturdays Sundays
Venetian Cswy W San Marino Dr Dade Blvd
Dade Blvd Venetian Cswy Alton Rd
17 St Alton Rd James Av
5 St Alton Rd Washington Av
Washington Av 5 St 17 St
17 St Washington Av Collins Ave
Collins Ave 17 St 41 St
41 St Collins Av Alton Rd
Indian Creek Dr 41 St 26 St
17 St Meridian Av Washington Av
Collins Ave Lincoln Rd 26 St
Collins Ave 26 St 44 St
Collins Ave 41 St Indian Creek Dr
Collins Ave Indian Creek Dr 87 Ter
Abbott/Harding 87 Ter Indian Creek Dr
Indian Creek Dr 41 St 26 St
Washington Av South Pointe Dr 17 St
Collins Ave Lincoln Rd 26 St
Collins Ave 26 St 44 St
Collins Ave 41 St Indian Creek Dr
Collins Ave Indian Creek Dr 87 Ter
Abbott/Harding 87 Ter Indian Creek Dr
Indian Creek Dr 41 St 26 St
41 St Alton Rd Collins Ave
Collins Ave 44 St Indian Creek Dr
Collins Ave Indian Creek Dr 87 Ter
Abbott/Harding Av 87 Ter Indian Creek Dr
5 St Alton Rd Washington Av
Washington Av 5 St Dade Blvd
Pinetree Dr Dade Blvd W 26 St
Sheridan Av W 26 St W 46 St
Pinetree Dr W 46 St W 51 St
Pinetree Dr W 51 St W 63 St
63 St Alton Rd Indian Creek Dr
Collins Ave 63 St 77 St
77 St Collins Av Hawthorne Av
Hawthorne Av 77 St 85 St
85 St Hawthorne Av Collins Ave
Collins Ave 85 St 87 Ter
Harding Av 87 Ter 85 St
Indian Creek Dr 77 St 63 St
Lagorce Dr 63 St W 51 St
71 St W Bay Dr E Bay Dr
71 St E Bay Dr Abbott/Harding Av
Abbott/Harding Av 71 St Indian Creek Dr
Indian Creek Dr Abbott/Harding Av 44 St
Indian Creek Dr 44 St 26 St
Collins Ave 26 St Lincoln Rd
17 St Washington Av Meridian Av
Collins Ave 26 St 44 St
Collins Ave Indian Creek Dr 73 St
Normandy Dr E Bay Dr W Bay Dr
ToFrom
PK HR
Headways
(minutes)
Route
Number RoadwayStops
Per Mile
Total
Monthly
Boardings
Average
Weekday
Boarding
(Riders/Day
)
Boarding By Day of Week/Month
A/101
C/103 20 4,041 84,862 19,510 15,946 120,318
G/107
H/108
J /110
K/111
L/112 10 10,825 227,328 40,627
20 4,077 85,617 10,360
12,991 146,728 7
30,745 298,700 5
13,011 108,989
15 5,582 117,213 16,524
30
20 4,777 100,320
69,2293,297 11,644
22,098 15,294 137,712
1,721 15,701 6
794,46413,591
20 588 12,343 1,637
7
6
7
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 26Table Table Table Table 4444 ---- MDT Routes, Headways, Ridership & Served Roadway Segments MDT Routes, Headways, Ridership & Served Roadway Segments MDT Routes, Headways, Ridership & Served Roadway Segments MDT Routes, Headways, Ridership & Served Roadway Segments ((((Cont’dCont’dCont’dCont’d))))
Weekdays Saturdays Sundays
5 St Alton Rd Washington Av
Washington Av 5 St South Point Dr
South Pointe Dr Washington Av Alton Rd
Alton Rd South Pointe Dr 17 St
17 St Alton Rd Washington Av
Collins Ave Lincoln Rd 26 St
Collins Ave 26 St 41 St
41 St Collins Av Alton Rd
Indian Creek Dr 41 St 26 St
17 St Washington Av Alton Rd
Alton Rd 17 St 63 St
63 St Alton Rd Collins Ave
Collins Ave 63 St 87 Ter
Harding Av 87 Ter 85 St
Hawthorne Av 85 St 77 St
Abbott/Harding Av 73 St 63 St
Alton Rd 5 St 17 St
17 St Alton Rd Washington Av
Collins Ave Lincoln Rd 26 St
Collins Ave 26 St 44 St
Indian Creek Dr 44 St 26 St
Indian Creek Dr 44 St Abbott/Harding Av
Collins Ave Indian Creek Dr 87 Ter
Abbott/Harding Av 87 Ter Indian Creek Dr
62 20 4,633 97,287 16,502 14,179 127,968 8 41 St Alton Rd Collins Ave
41 St Alton Rd Collins Ave
Collins Ave 44 St Indian Creek Dr
Collins Ave Indian Creek Dr 87 Ter
Abbott/Harding Av 87 Ter Indian Creek Dr
Indian Creek Dr Abbott/Harding Av Collins Ave
246/Nigh
t Owl 403 8,461 1,792 2,650 12,903
Biscayne St Washington Av Alton Rd
Alton Rd Biscayne St 6 St
6 St Alton Rd West Av
West Av 6 St Lincoln Rd
Lincoln Rd West Av Alton Rd
Alton Rd Lincoln Rd 20 St
20 St Alton Rd West Av
West Av 20 St 18 St
18 St West Av Bay Rd
Bay Rd 18 St 20 St
20 St Bay Rd Alton Rd
Dade Blvd Alton Rd Merideian Av
Meridian Av Dade Blvd 17 St
17 St Meridian Av Washington Av
Washington Av 17 St Biscayne St
M/113
R/118
120/Beac
h Max
S/119
123/S.
Beach
Local
15 6,177 129,722 28,030 82,058 239,810 9
2192,9574,314
Total
Monthly
Boardings
Stops
Per Mile
3,690184,9528,80730
12 12,548 263,516 48,106 56,335 367,958 7
45 583 12,233 - - 12,233 6
738,0272,8092,65632,5621,55130
Route
Number
PK HR
Headways
(minutes)
Average
Weekday
Boarding
(Riders/Day
)
Boarding By Day of Week/Month
Roadway From To
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 27Existing Bus Routes and Stops
Figure 12 shows all Metrobus routes and stops including the local South Beach Circulator. Appendix-A
includes detailed maps of every bus route servicing the City. Many MDT bus routes overlap in the City
of Miami Beach but these routes connect to different parts of Miami-Dade County. There are total 369
bus stops in the City.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 28Figure 12 – Existing Bus Stop Locations
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 29Existing Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer Locations
There are 63 bus transfer locations in the City (Table 6). Figure 13 depicts the locations of these
transfer stops. A transfer station is a transit stop where riders can transfer from one route to another to
continue their trip to the final destination.
Table Table Table Table 5555---- Existing Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer Locations
Bus Stop Id #Bus Stop Id #Bus Stop Id #Bus Stop Id # Main StreetMain StreetMain StreetMain Street Cross StCross StCross StCross Streetreetreetreet DirectionDirectionDirectionDirection
MBC-0284
MBC-0014
MBC-0017
MBC-0033
MBC-0249
MBC-0171
MBC-0150
MBC-0119.
MBC-0076
MBC-0302
MBC-0303
MBC-0306
MBC-0318
MBC-0353
MBC-0376
MBC-0376
MBC-0383
MBC-0097
MBC-0238
MBC-0369
MBC-0384
MBC-0039
MBC-0061
MBC-0229
MBC-0331
MBC-033
MBC-0371
MBC-0390
MBC-0057
MBC-0058
MBC-0293
MBC-0306
MBC-0341
Alton Road
Collins Avenue
Collins Avenue
Collins Avenue
Alton Road
Washington Avenue
Sheridan Avenue
Sheridan Avenue
Indian Creek Drive
Alton Road
Alton Road
West Avenue
Hawthorne Avenue
17 Street
41 Street
41 Street
41 Street
Washington Avenue
Alton Road
41 Street
41 Street
Collins Avenue
Indian Creek Drive
Alton Road
5 Street
5 Street
41 Street
63 Street
Harding Avenue
Abbott Avenue
Alton Road
West Avenue
6 Street
39 Street
38 Street
43 Street
63 Street
41 Street
4 Street
41 Street
40 Street
43 Street
6 Street
2 Street
20 Street
85 Street
Meridian Avenue
Alton Road
Alton Road
Pinetree Drive
5 Street
Lincoln Road Mall
Indian Creek Drive
Collins Avenue
69 Street
63 Street
6 Street
Lenox Av
Lenox Av
Sheridan Av
Indian Creek Drive
72 Street
69 Street
Lincoln Road
15 Terrace
Alton Road
S
N
NE
N
NW
S
S
N
S
S
S
S
N
E
SW
E
E
N
N
W
E
N
S
N
W
E
W
E
S
S
S
S
E
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 30Bus Stop Id #Bus Stop Id #Bus Stop Id #Bus Stop Id # Main StreetMain StreetMain StreetMain Street Cross StCross StCross StCross Streetreetreetreet DirectionDirectionDirectionDirection
MBC-0345
MBC-0355
MBC-0170
MBC-0107
MBC-0047
MBC-0355
MBC-0283
MBC-0370
MBC-0385
MBC-0500
MBC-0350
MBC-0382
MBC-0344
MBC-0292
MBC-0040
MBC-0059
MBC-0162
MBC-0077
MBC-0356
MBC-0399
MBC-0410
MBC-0161
MBC-0108
MBC-0357
MBC-0343
MBC-0050
MBC-0054
MBC-0327
MBC-0388
MBC-0398
17 Street
17 Street
Washington Avenue
Washington Avenue
Collins Avenue
19 Street
Alton Road
41 Street
47 Court
Mt Sinai Hospital
17 Street
41 Street
Lincoln Road
Alton Road
Collins Avenue
Abbott Avenue
Washington Avenue
Indian Creek Drive
Dade Boulevard
71 Street
72 Street
Washington Av
Washington Av
Dade Boulevard
Lincoln Road
Harding Avenue
Harding Avenue
5 Street
63 Street
71 Street
Washington Avenue
Washington Av
5 Street
Lincoln Road
85 Street
Convention Center Drive
41 Street
Pine Tree Drive
48 Street (Op Heart Inst
Main Door
Lenox Avenue
Sheridan Avenue
Washington Avenue
17 Street
72 Street
Indian Creek Drive
Lincoln Road
41 Street
Alton Road
Abbott Avenue
Harding Avenue
17 Street
17 Street
West Avenue
Washington Avenue
85 Street
77 Street
Washington Avenue
Pinetree Drive
Indian Creek Drive
W
E
S
N
N
W
SE
W
E
S
E
E
E
S
N
S
S
S
SW
E
W
S
N
SW
W
S
S
W
E
E
Source: Miami Dade County (2008)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 31Figure 13 Figure 13 Figure 13 Figure 13 –––– Existing Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer LocationsExisting Bus Transfer Locations
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 32Existing FixedExisting FixedExisting FixedExisting Fixed----Guideway Transit Service and Station LocationsGuideway Transit Service and Station LocationsGuideway Transit Service and Station LocationsGuideway Transit Service and Station Locations
MDT’s Fixed-Guideway or Premium Transit Service’s which include Metrorail, Metromover, Busway
and South Florida Regional Transportation Authority’s Tri-rail are not available within the City. Figure
14 shows Metrorail, Metromover, Tri-rail stations in the County.
Metrorail is an important component of the regional urban heavy rail mass transit system in Miami-
Dade County. Metrorail is a 22.4-mile, electrically powered, elevated rapid transit system and runs
from Pinecrest through South Miami, Coral Gables and downtown Miami to the Civic Center and
Jackson Memorial Hospital area and to Brownsville, Liberty City, Hialeah, and Medley in northwest
Miami-Dade, with connections to Broward and Palm Beach counties at the Tri-Rail and Metrorail
transfer station. The County’s Metrobus service provides connectivity from the City to the Metrorail
Transit Stations.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 33Figure 14 Figure 14 Figure 14 Figure 14 –––– Existing FixedExisting FixedExisting FixedExisting Fixed----Guideway Transit ServiceGuideway Transit ServiceGuideway Transit ServiceGuideway Transit Service
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 34Existing Intermodal TerminalsExisting Intermodal TerminalsExisting Intermodal TerminalsExisting Intermodal Terminals
Figure 15 shows all of the intermodal facilities located in Miami Dade County. These facilities are
accessible through Metrobus service from the City. In addition to these intermodal terminals there are
several park and ride locations along the Metrorail and Tri Rail service. These park and ride locations
are accessible through Metrobus service from the City.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 35Figure 15 Figure 15 Figure 15 Figure 15 –––– Existing Intermodal TerminalsExisting Intermodal TerminalsExisting Intermodal TerminalsExisting Intermodal Terminals
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 36ParaParaParaParatransittransittransittransit
The MDT provides public transit services to attract riders in travel markets where fixed-route transit
service is not available. These include programs for the public transportation disabled and services in
addition to Metrobus and Metrorail. The division of Metrobus Para-transit Operations that deals with
this component is the Office of Special Transportation Services (STS). This division provides a variety of
services including demand-responsive services for the elderly and handicapped, and other public
transit services. All of these services are provided for the residents of the City for destinations both
within the City and countywide. These services are described in greater detail as follows:
• Special Transportation Service –––––––– This service is available to certified/eligible elderly or
handicapped persons. The service provides for countywide curb-to-curb shared rides in a car
or a van for elderly, handicapped or mobility impaired persons who are unable to use
Metrobus. This service is available either by reservation or subscription seven days a week, 24
hours a day. The average number of weekday boardings for June 2008 was 4,600. A private
transportation company under contract to the county provides this service.
• Florida Medicaid Transportation Program –––––––– This service provides transportation for both
ambulatory and wheelchair clients.
In addition to services provided by MDT, South Florida Commuter Services operates carpool, vanpool,
and ride sharing programs. Many city residents enjoy the benefits of these services.
EEEEEEEExxxxxxxxiiiiiiiissssssssttttttttiiiiiiiinnnnnnnngggggggg TTTTTTTTrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaddddddddiiiiiiiittttttttiiiiiiiioooooooonnnnnnnnaaaaaaaallllllll RRRRRRRRaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiillllllll NNNNNNNNeeeeeeeettttttttwwwwwwwwoooooooorrrrrrrrkkkkkkkk
In addition to the fixed-guide way transit service provided, the rail network also consists of railroads
that have freight operations. Figure 16 shows the rail network that provides freight and passenger
service in Miami-Dade County. This network does not extend into the City of Miami Beach. There are
two operating freight railroads in the County: CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway (FEC).
• CSX is the largest rail freight carrier in Florida, but its network is limited in Miami-Dade County.
The carrier uses FEC trackage rights to serve the FEC’s Hialeah Yard and to access its own
network in the southern end of the County to Homestead.
• The FEC operates a freight-only rail operation focusing on four principal markets in South
Florida:
1. Intermodal containers and trailers to serve local markets and the Port of Miami.
2. Rock and stone used for construction from quarries in the County to concrete plants
and construction depots along the east coast of the state.
3. Automobiles to South Florida for local sale or for export.
4. Limited carload freight service to local customer warehousing facilities.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 37Figure 16 Figure 16 Figure 16 Figure 16 –––– Existing Rail NetworkExisting Rail NetworkExisting Rail NetworkExisting Rail Network
8
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 38
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesExisting Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesExisting Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesExisting Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
The City of Miami Beach has several designated on-road bicycle facilities in place. Table 6 describes
existing bicycle facilities and Figure 17 depicts them. The City of Miami Beach’s Atlantic Greenway
Network Plan proposes placing bike paths, routes, and bike boulevards.
Table Table Table Table 6666 ---- Existing Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle FacilitiesExisting Bicycle Facilities
OnOnOnOn----Street FacilitiesStreet FacilitiesStreet FacilitiesStreet Facilities FromFromFromFrom ToToToTo Length (in miles)Length (in miles)Length (in miles)Length (in miles)
Fountain Street MacArthur Causeway Hibiscus Drive 0.4
Venetian Causeway Bayshore Drive 17 Street 2.6
Alton Road Michigan Avenue Chase Avenue 0.9
16 Street Bay Road Washington Street 0.7
Prairie Avenue 28 Street 44 Street 0.8
42 Street Prairie Road Sheridan Road 0.2
44 Street Prairie Road Pine Tree Drive .3
Royal Palm Avenue 42 Street 47 Street 0.2
47 Street Pine Tree Drive North Bay Road 0.6
MixedMixedMixedMixed----use (Bike and use (Bike and use (Bike and use (Bike and
Pedestrian) FacilitiesPedestrian) FacilitiesPedestrian) FacilitiesPedestrian) Facilities
FromFromFromFrom ToToToTo Length (in miles)Length (in miles)Length (in miles)Length (in miles)
Miami Beach
Beachwalk
5 Street 21 Street 1.5
Miami Beach
Baywalk
21 Street 46 Street 2
North Shore Open
Space Park Path
79 Street 87 Street 0.5
Park View Island 77 Street 75 Street 0.2
Miami Beach Drive 24 Street 29 Street 0.3
North Beach
BeachWalk
64 Street 73 Street 0.9
Source: City of Miami Beach (2008), Miami Dade County (2008)
In addition to the above, bicycle access is permitted along all arterials, collectors and local streets. The
City has a large network of sidewalks that create a pedestrian system. Sidewalks run along a vast
majority of its roadway network. These sidewalks provide continuous pedestrian circulation capacity
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 39between residential, civic, and commercial destinations. Pedestrian activity is highly influenced by the
proximity and variety of land uses, as well as by the availability of proper facilities. In addition to the
dedicated pedestrian facilities, there are shared facilities accessible to both, pedestrians and bicyclists
(Table 6).
There are main pedestrian areas where limited vehicle access is permitted such as Lincoln Road Mall
and Espanola Way. These areas have adequate amenities such as pushbutton crosswalks, adequate
lighting, signaling scaled for different modes of transportation, adequate dimensions for the demand
of pedestrians, etc.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 40Figure 17 – Existing Bicycle Facilities
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 41Figure 18 – Existing Sidewalks
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 423.4 Methodology for Service Volumes/Level of
Service/Roadway Capacity
Roadway Traffic Volumes and Levels of ServiceRoadway Traffic Volumes and Levels of ServiceRoadway Traffic Volumes and Levels of ServiceRoadway Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service
Vehicular traffic conditions within the boundaries of the City of Miami Beach were analyzed for the
current year 2008 and forecasted for the years 2015 and 2030. Specifically traffic volumes were
obtained and developed for these years as well as their corresponding Levels of Service (LOS). The
years 2015 and 2030 were selected because they conform to the forecasted years from the Miami
Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) adopted Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and
related roadway networks and documents.
Chapter 9J-5 requires that local governments adopt level of service standards during peak hour for
roadways and transit facilities. Roadway Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of the efficiency
of roadway operation. LOS is generally described through the assignment of highway segment or
intersection operating grades. LOS are letter values ranging from A (excellent) to F (poor) which reflect
different degrees of vehicular traffic congestion on a roadway, as well as the associated delays,
operating speeds, degree of comfort in ability to change traffic lanes, etc. LOS A reflects the best
traffic conditions with little or no delays with vehicles being able to travel comfortably at the posted
speed limits or slightly above for relatively long distances, whereas LOS F represents the worse traffic
conditions with excessive delays, long vehicular queues at signalized intersections and forced vehicular
flow at very low or “crawling” speeds.
LOS A and B are usually not easy to achieve on arterial and main collector roadways in large
urbanized areas like Miami Dade County and the City of Miami Beach during typical high volume
peak hour traffic periods. LOS D and E are more typically found in large urbanized areas for these
types of roadways and are usually the most cost beneficial use of the roads. Unfortunately many
roadways are operating at LOS F.
Highway capacity constitutes the maximum number of vehicles which could pass a given point within a
given period (usually daily or peak hour) under controlled conditions. Service volume relates to the
number of vehicles that could be anticipated to pass the same point at a desired level of service. This is
usually expressed as a ratio which could be converted into level of service or the percentage of
capacity utilized. (Volume/Capacity = LOS)
In order to make a broad review of highway operation, analysts often rely upon generalized roadway
capacity values using industry standard references or inputs. Appendix AAppendix AAppendix AAppendix A presents the most current
FDOT generalized service volumes for daily and peak conditions.
While generalized values are useful for broad analysis purposes, roadway capacity and level of service
are actually complex, highly site-specific relationships of many factors including: highway and
intersection design attributes, weather, time-of-day, traffic volume, vehicle mix, traffic signal
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 43characteristics, adjacent land use and related provisions for access. For this reason, it is important to
note that roadway operating characteristics (levels of service) are dynamic and widely divergent based
upon the level of detail afforded in a specific analysis. As previously noted, the FDOT service volume
tables are based on traffic and roadway design characteristics as observed throughout many urban
areas of the state. In this respect, intersection analysis and/or field surveys of actual drive time (speed
and delay studies) can also provide valuable data to calibrate or augment the use of generalized
analysis procedures.
The level of service standard is used as a guide for planning purposes, to identify the needs and to plan
for the improvements necessary to maintain a desired level of service. Much more detailed analysis is
required to determine specific needs or to evaluate specific projects in the design fazes.
3.5 Capacity of Year 2008 Existing Roadway System
For the existing condition analysis, FDOT traffic information was used, FDOT conducts an ongoing
yearly program of average daily traffic counts on major roadways. The FDOT existing traffic as shown
on in the tables is based on the projected Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) for the year 2008.
Average annual daily traffic is a year-round average including seasonal and off-season traffic. Peak
hour volumes were obtained by applying a factor of 0.08 for bi-directional volumes and 0.54 for
directional volumes. These are generally accepted average peak hour ratios used on roadways within
the state possessing similar characteristics to those on the causeways that lead to the City of Miami
Beach and other state roads within the City Limits.
Where FDOT traffic information was not available, 48-hour vehicular traffic counts were collected at
locations throughout the City during the months of October and early November of 2008 and
converted to AADT by using the appropriate seasonal factors from the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) traffic data base. Table 7 and Figure 20 reflect the traffic count locations
through the City.
The adjusted field counts as well as other adjusted traffic volume data available from the FDOT
highway traffic networks in conjunction with other available documents provided by the City formed the
basis for obtaining the traffic volumes and assessing current capacities and LOS for roadways classified
as arterials and collectors roads.
Reserve roadway capacity was also determined for each of the three Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas (TCMAs) within the City of Miami Beach using the previously approved
methodology by the FDOT and DCA.
The numbers of through-lanes that exist within the City of Miami Beach at this time are depicted in the
tables as well as in Figure 19. The existing number of lanes is shown for arterial and collector
roadways within the City. All other roadways are two (2) lanes, one in each direction.
From the collected data and the pertinent analyses, tables were developed which depict traffic
volumes, capacities, LOS as well as other roadway related data such as number of lanes, class based
in FDOT and HCM methodologies, functional classification, among other. Maps were also developed
which reflect the one-way (directional), two-way (bi-directional) peak hour LOS as well as the daily LOS
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 44for the selected roadways. Tables 8 through 10 and Figures 21 through 22 depict Year 2008 traffic
conditions, levels of service and available roadway capacity.
Examination of the tables and maps would then indicate which of the analyzed roadways in the City of
Miami Beach are operating at or above adopted LOS.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 45Figure 19 Figure 19 Figure 19 Figure 19 –––– Number of Through Lanes for Major ThoroughfaresNumber of Through Lanes for Major ThoroughfaresNumber of Through Lanes for Major ThoroughfaresNumber of Through Lanes for Major Thoroughfares
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 46TaTaTaTable ble ble ble 7777 –––– Traffic Count LocationsTraffic Count LocationsTraffic Count LocationsTraffic Count Locations
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD 300 FT EAST OF WEST AVE
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR 200 FT EAST OF EUCLID ST
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD 200 FT WEST OF MERIDIAN RD
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV 100 FT EAST OF EUCLID RD
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD 200 FT WEST OF MERIDIAN RD.
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV 100 EAST OF MERIDIAN RD.
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR 100 FT EAST OF MERIDIAN RD.
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST 200 FT NORTH OF 3TH STREET
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST 100 N OF 9TH STREET
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST 200 FT NORTH OF 13TH STREET
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD 2542 200' S OF VENETIAN CSWY N 18500
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST 5159 200' N 5 ST(MIAMI BEACH)
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST 100 FT NORTH OF 3TH ST
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST 100' NORTH 12 STREET
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST 50' SOUTH 16 STREET
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DRALTON RD 100' NORTH 12 STREET
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR 50' SOUTH 16 STREET
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD 2527 200' W SR 907/ALTON RD
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD 2528 200' E SR 907/ALTON RD
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST 200 FT NORTH OF 14TH ST
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD 500 FT NORTH OF 18TH ST
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST 100' NORTH OF S. POINT DR.
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST 500 FT NORTH OF 6TH ST
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR 100' EAST OF COLLINS AVE
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST 100' SOUNT OF 1 ST.
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST 200 FT NORTH OF 9TH ST
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST 200 FT NORTH OF 13TH STREET
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD 300 FT NORTH OF 17ST.
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST 100 FT NORTH OF 7TH ST
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD 200 FT NORTH OF 15 TH ST
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR 200' EAST LAGORCE DR.
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST 0012 200' N OF 20 ST (MIAMI BEACH)
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST 1018 200' S W 51 ST(MIAMI BEACH)
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR 5388 200' W INDIAN CREEK DR
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A 26TH ST 44TH ST 5170 N OF 21 ST (MIAMI BEACH)
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR 0011 N OF W 46 ST(MIAMI BEACH)
MB07 LA GORCE DR 51ST ST 63RD ST 100' NORTH OF 54 STREET
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST 100' NORTH OF 45 STREET
MB09 PINETREE DR 51ST ST 63RD ST 100' NORTH 49TH STREET
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST 100' NORTH OF 23 ST.
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST 100' SOUTH 37 ST
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST 2646 200' SOUTH OF 38 STREET
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV 5189 200' W SR A1A/HARDING AV
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER 0525 100' N 87 ST
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR71ST ST 2541 200' S OF 63 ST (MIAMI BEACH)
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER 0520 100' N 87 ST
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST 1000' NORTH OF ABBOTT AVE
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 93471ST ST BAY DR 0115 100' W RUE VERSAILLES.
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR 100' W RUE VERSAILLES.
COUNT LOCATIONROADWAYSITE
No.
FDOT
SITE No.FROM TO
SEGMENT
Note: No 2007 traffic data was available for FDOT traffic count station number 0115. A 48-hour
traffic count was carried out for this location.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 47Figure 20 Figure 20 Figure 20 Figure 20 –––– FDOT & 48FDOT & 48FDOT & 48FDOT & 48----hour Count Locationshour Count Locationshour Count Locationshour Count Locations
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 48
Table Table Table Table 8888 –––– 2008 Peak2008 Peak2008 Peak2008 Peak----Hour, PeakHour, PeakHour, PeakHour, Peak----Direction Roadway Operating ConditionsDirection Roadway Operating ConditionsDirection Roadway Operating ConditionsDirection Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 215 D 305
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 390 D 130
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 590 D 50
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 190 C 330
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 415 C 1895
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 1,640 4U 560 1,090 1,260 CITY COLLECTOR 695 D 945
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 3,500 6D 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1095 D 2405
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 300 C 1410
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1510 D 220
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1075 D 655
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1755 F -25
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 STATE ARTERIAL 630 D 170
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 CITY COLLECTOR 210 C 590
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 STATE ARTERIAL 480 D 320
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 1,710 4U 490 1,140 1,290 STATE ARTERIAL 735 D 975
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 580 C 1730
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 885 C 1425
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 3,350 6D 2,720 2,790 2,790 STATE ARTERIAL 3060 D 290
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,500 6D 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1310 D 2190
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 395 D 125
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 510 D 130
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 170 C 350
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 370 D 150
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 315 D 325
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 230 C 1480
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 705 D 1005
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 550 C 1160
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 1,640 4U 560 1,090 1,260 CITY COLLECTOR 435 C 1205
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 620 D 20
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 600 D 40
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 2455 F -725
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 1,710 4D 1,360 1,710 1,800 STATE ARTERIAL 2100 F -390
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 1,860 4D 1,810 1,860 1,860 STATE ARTERIAL 1680 C 180
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 1,820 4U 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1800 D 20
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, ONE WAY NB 26TH ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 985 C 1815
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 2,100 6D 770 1,750 1,940 STATE ARTERIAL 1540 D 560
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 800 D 570
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 1,370 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 305 C 1065
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 890 D 480
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 360 D 160
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 150 C 370
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 875 D 945
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 615 C 1115
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2105 D 695
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1300 D 1500
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1945 D 855
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 1,820 4D 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1305 D 515
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1560 D 1240
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1500 D 1,300
SEGMENT ADOPTED
ADJUSTED
STANDARD
ROADWAY
SITEAVAIL.
TRIPS
Peak Dir
LOS
2008
TRIPSFUNC CLASSJURISLANES
**UU == UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,, DD == DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 49Figure 21 Figure 21 Figure 21 Figure 21 ---- 2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (One2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (One2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (One2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (One----Way)Way)Way)Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 50
Table Table Table Table 9999 –––– 2008 Peak2008 Peak2008 Peak2008 Peak----Hour, TwoHour, TwoHour, TwoHour, Two----Way Roadway Operating ConditionsWay Roadway Operating ConditionsWay Roadway Operating ConditionsWay Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 355 C 565
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 655 D 265
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 960 D 180
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 300 C 620
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,930 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 800 C 3,130
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 1185 D 1,775
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 1910 D 4450
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 410 C 2700
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 2845 D 305
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1920 D 1230
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3225 F -75
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1155 D 285
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 CITY COLLECTOR 350 C 1090
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 895 D 545
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 3,110 4U 890 2,070 2,340 STATE ARTERIAL 1285 D 1825
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1080 C 3140
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1650 C 2570
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 6,100 6D 4,950 5,080 5,080 STATE ARTERIAL 5715 D 385
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2445 D 3915
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 730 D 190
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 805 D 335
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 270 C 650
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 680 D 240
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 470 D 670
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 395 C 2715
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1210 D 1900
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 935 C 2175
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 695 C 2265
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1080 D 60
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1040 D 100
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3160 F -10
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 3,110 4D 2,470 3,110 3,270 STATE ARTERIAL 3860 F -750
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 3,390 4D 3,300 3,390 3,390 STATE ARTERIAL 3090 C 300
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,300 4U 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3285 D 15
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A/ONE-WAY PAIR NB, 26TH ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 985 C 1815
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,820 6D 1,390 3,180 3,520 STATE ARTERIAL 2830 D 990
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 800 D 570
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 2,490 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 470 C 2020
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 890 D 480
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 375 D 545
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 275 C 645
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 875 D 945
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1130 C 2020
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2105 D 695
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1300 D 1500
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1945 D 855
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 3,300 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 1760 D 1540
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1560 D 1240
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1500 D 1300
FUNC CLASSJURIS
ADJUSTED
STANDARD
SITEROADWAY LANES
SEGMENT ADOPTED AVAIL.
TRIPS
2-WAY
LOS
2008
TRIPS
**UU == UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,, DD == DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 51Figure 22 Figure 22 Figure 22 Figure 22 ---- 2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (Two2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (Two2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (Two2008 Peak Hour Level of Service (Two----Way)Way)Way)Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 52Table 1Table 1Table 1Table 10000 ---- 2008 Daily Roadways Operating Conditions2008 Daily Roadways Operating Conditions2008 Daily Roadways Operating Conditions2008 Daily Roadways Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 4,150 D 5,450
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 8,265 D 1335
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 13,050 F -1050
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 3,845 D 5755
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 10,315 C 34015
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 30,930 4U 10,550 20,620 23,940 CITY COLLECTOR 16,715 D 14,215
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 67,050 6D 19,500 44,700 49,300 STATE ARTERIAL 30,035 D 37015
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 5,315 C 27235
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 42,450 F -9490
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 29,145 D 3815
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 40,220 F -7260
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 STATE ARTERIAL 14,400 D 720
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 CITY COLLECTOR 4,530 D 10590
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 STATE ARTERIAL 15,425 F -305
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 32,520 4U 9,300 21,680 24,600 STATE ARTERIAL 21,505 D 11015
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 15,370 C 28960
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 23,395 D 20935
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 64,200 6D 52,100 53,500 53,500 STATE ARTERIAL 80,360 F -16160
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 67,050 6D 19,500 44,700 49,300 STATE ARTERIAL 34,370 D 32680
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 8,750 D 850
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 10,430 D 1570
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 3,185 C 6415
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 11,030 F -1430
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 6,555 D 5445
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 4,715 C 27835
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 18,260 D 14290
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 14,835 D 17715
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 30,930 4U 10,550 20,620 23,940 CITY COLLECTOR 9,035 C 21895
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 13,930 F -1930
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 13,580 F -1580
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 35,995 F -3035
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 32,700 4D 26,000 32,700 34,500 STATE ARTERIAL 48,175 F -15475
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 35,700 4D 34,700 35,700 35,700 STATE ARTERIAL 38,565 F -2865
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 34,680 4U 12,400 28,900 32,800 STATE ARTERIAL 39,245 F -4565
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, ONE WAY NB 26TH ST 44TH ST D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 13,470 D 18720
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 40,240 6D 14,630 33,530 36,980 STATE ARTERIAL 35,330 D 4910
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 7,200 2 2,880 6,000 7,560 CITY COLLECTOR 6,385 D 815
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 26,040 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 5,410 C 20630
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 7,200 2 2,880 6,000 7,560 CITY COLLECTOR 14,050 F -6850
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 2,550 C 7050
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 2,505 C 7095
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 20,810 2 7,440 17,340 19,680 STATE ARTERIAL 13,395 D 7415
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 14,050 D 18910
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 26,275 D 5915
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 16,215 D 15975
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 24,245 D 7945
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 34,680 4D 12,400 28,900 32,800 STATE ARTERIAL 22,850 D 11830
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 18,335 D 13855
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 18,020 D 14170
JURIS FUNC CLASS
SEGMENT ADOPTED ADJUSTED STANDARD AVAIL.
TRIPSSITEROADWAYLANES2008
TRIPS
DAILY
LOS
**UU == UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,, DD == DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 53Figure 23 Figure 23 Figure 23 Figure 23 ---- 2008 Daily Level of Service (Two2008 Daily Level of Service (Two2008 Daily Level of Service (Two2008 Daily Level of Service (Two----Way)Way)Way)Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 543.6 Existing Street Capacity Deficiencies
Review of the above tables reveal that the following roadways are currently (Year 2008) worse than the
adopted acceptable levels of service during either the one- and two-way peak hour periods.
South Beach:
• Alton Road between 15th Street and Dade Boulevard;
Middle Beach:
• 63rd Street between Alton Road and Indian Creek Drive;
• Alton Road between Dade Boulevard and 41st Street;
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 553.7 Existing Airports and Waterports
The Home Rule Charter for Miami-Dade County designates the County as the owner and operator of
the aviation facilities located within the County. Therefore, the Miami-Dade County Aviation
Department operates the County-owned aviation facilities. As a result, this element is consistent with
the Miami-Dade County Aviation Sub-Element.
The City of Miami Beach does not have any airport or waterports within its boundaries. Several facilities
are within two to 10 miles of the City. Major facilities nearby include the Port of Miami, Miami
International Airport, and Opa Locka Airport. There is however, a Coast Guard Station at the ferry
dock to Fisher Island.
Existing AirportsExisting AirportsExisting AirportsExisting Airports
Figure 24 shows all of the airports within 10 miles of the City. Miami international airport (MIA) is
located nine miles from the western boundary of the City and is an international gateway facility, which
serves commercial passenger and freight transport needs for the region. MIA is currently the 29th
busiest passenger airport in the world with more than 33.74 million passengers reported in calendar
year 2007. MIA services more than 150 destinations throughout the world. There are approximately
80 scheduled airlines serving the airport. MIA is ranked third busiest airport in the U.S. in terms of total
international passengers and ranks 15th in the U.S. in terms of total passengers. MIA continues to be
the number one airport in the nation for international freight (2007, and number three in the U.S. for
total freight. Several roadway facilities lead from the City to the airport, including, I-195 and I-395.
Opa-locka airport is located 10 miles from the western boundary of the City and is a large general
aviation transport airport, designated in the Florida Aviation System Plan as a reliever airport for
general aviation needs in the county. By the year 2010, this level of activity is expected to grow to
more than 337,000 operations.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 56Figure 24Figure 24Figure 24Figure 24---- Existing AirportsExisting AirportsExisting AirportsExisting Airports
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 57Water PortsWater PortsWater PortsWater Ports
Figure 25 shows the existing water ports within two and three miles from the City. There are two water
modes within the County accessible to the City residents and businesses – deep water and river
shipping. The capacity of the waterways is important, but there are few issues demanding attention
from a regional transportation planning perspective. The impact of the water modes on the inland
transportation system, however, is a significant issue. The Miami River, for example, serves as an artery
for both passenger and freight vessels. The five and a half mile long river serves 24 certified
international shipping terminals from Biscayne Bay to NW 37 Avenue near the Miami International
Airport. There is little public oversight of the operations of the port; however, there is a regulatory
presence for the environmental integrity of each of the privately operated terminals and boat docks.
Shipping on the Miami River consists of bulk materials such as scrap metal and stone or other bulk
products. This trend is expected to continue until 2035.
The Port of Miami is one of the nation’s busiest ports and serves commercial passengers and freight
transport needs. During fiscal year 2007, 3.75 million passengers passed through the Port, and more
than 7.84 million tons and 879,398 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) of cargo transited through the
seaport. The Port of Miami serves more than 20 shipping lines that serve 250 ports globally. The Port
of Miami is accessible from Miami Beach through I-395, about two miles away.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 58Figure 25 Figure 25 Figure 25 Figure 25 –––– Existing WaterportsExisting WaterportsExisting WaterportsExisting Waterports
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 593.8 Conclusion
This section has described the existing conditions of the transportation network of the City of Miami
Beach.
Based on an analysis of the roadway inventory and density of the City, all facilities fall within the
category of urban roadways based on population intensity. Additionally, the City has north-south
facilities that carry regional traffic traveling from the Coastal Communities as well as main east-west
arteries that connect to the causeways that at the same time connect to the interstate system.
The transit system is mainly the responsibility of Miami-Dade Transit. The City has 15 main routes that
provide service to its residents and based on an analysis of transit service area, it is obvious that most
of the City comes under a ½ mile and under ¼ mile radius of transit coverage. Currently the existing
transit route serves most of Miami Beach.
The pedestrian and bicycle network are most needed surrounding main traffic generators such as the
commercial areas, schools, churches, civic centers, bus stops, hospital area and other activity centers.
The City has been implementing additional bicycle paths and improving pedestrian connectivity
through its Atlantic Greenway Network Plan. It is recommended that in the next phase of this project
the plan is re-evaluated with the Project Management Team to evaluate possible additional
improvements that can be included in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and that address the
resident’s concerns.
Task 4 will evaluate the future transportation network and identify needs in Years 2015 and 2030.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 60
APPENDICES
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
Appendix A – FDOT Generalized Tables
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
Appendix B – Traffic Data Collection
Summary Tables
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
AM PM DAILY AM PM DAILY AM PM DAILY AM PM DAILY AM PM DAILY
MB01 13971 22025 35995 3159 2579 3159 2452 1398 2452 22.61% 11.71% 8.78% 77.62% 54.21% 77.62%
MB02 000000000000000
MB03 000000000000000
MB04 000000000000000
MB05 4239 9229 13467 687 984 984 0 0 984 16.21% 10.66% 7.31% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
MB06 000000000000000
MB07 2867 3517 6384 799 434 799 0 0 799 27.87% 12.34% 12.52% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
MB08 1862 3545 5407 393 467 467 277 303 303 21.11% 13.17% 8.64% 70.48% 64.88% 64.88%
MB09 5009 9037 14046 1242 1191 1242 886 757 886 24.80% 13.18% 8.84% 71.34% 63.56% 71.34%
MB10 933 1617 2550 367 349 372 359 180 359 39.34% 21.58% 14.59% 97.82% 51.58% 96.51%
MB11 876 1626 2502 174 275 275 104 146 146 19.86% 16.91% 10.99% 59.77% 53.09% 53.09%
MB12 5142 8253 13395 867 845 875 0 0 875 16.86% 10.24% 6.53% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
NB01 000000000000000
NB02 000000000000000
NB03 000000000000000
NB04 000000000000000
NB05 8258 14592 22849 1760 1731 1760 1304 1043 1304 21.31% 11.86% 7.70% 74.09% 60.25% 74.09%
NB06 5524 12811 18335 1086 1560 1560 0 0 1560 19.66% 12.18% 8.51% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
NB07 6643 11373 18016 1497 1220 1497 0 0 1497 22.53% 10.73% 8.31% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
SB01 1380 2768 4147 333 343 351 212 195 212 24.13% 12.39% 8.46% 63.66% 56.85% 60.40%
SB02 2719 5543 8262 528 652 652 298 387 387 19.42% 11.76% 7.89% 56.44% 59.36% 59.36%
SB03 4325 8722 13047 726 958 958 464 590 590 16.79% 10.98% 7.34% 63.91% 61.59% 61.59%
SB04 1387 2457 3843 208 298 298 153 186 186 15.00% 12.13% 7.75% 73.56% 62.42% 62.42%
SB05 3234 7078 10312 635 800 800 346 415 415 19.64% 11.30% 7.76% 54.49% 51.88% 51.88%
SB06 5850 10861 16711 968 1184 1184 550 691 691 16.55% 10.90% 7.09% 56.82% 58.36% 58.36%
SB07 10756 19276 30032 1710 1909 1909 881 1091 1091 15.90% 9.90% 6.36% 51.52% 57.15% 57.15%
SB08 1692 3622 5313 330 406 406 226 300 300 19.50% 11.21% 7.64% 68.48% 73.89% 73.89%
SB08A 2233 4941 7174 443 538 538 259 312 312 19.84% 10.89% 7.50% 58.47% 57.99% 57.99%
SB09 14262 28187 42449 2638 2833 2845 1436 1509 1509 18.50% 10.05% 6.70% 54.44% 53.27% 53.04%
SB10 10052 19094 29145 1709 1917 1917 925 1071 1071 17.00% 10.04% 6.58% 54.13% 55.87% 55.87%
SB11 000000000000000
SB12 000000000000000
SB13 1490 3039 4528 248 347 347 136 206 206 16.64% 11.42% 7.66% 54.84% 59.37% 59.37%
SB14 5816 9607 15423 812 895 895 431 479 479 13.96% 9.32% 5.80% 53.08% 53.52% 53.52%
SB15 7889 13614 21503 1224 1281 1281 712 729 733 15.52% 9.41% 5.96% 58.17% 56.91% 57.22%
SB16 4716 10651 15366 923 1080 1080 472 578 578 19.57% 10.14% 7.03% 51.14% 53.52% 53.52%
SB17 7633 15761 23393 1312 1649 1649 671 885 885 17.19% 10.46% 7.05% 51.14% 53.67% 53.67%
SB18 000000000000000
SB19 000000000000000
SB20 2848 5902 8750 611 727 727 318 393 393 21.45% 12.32% 8.31% 52.05% 54.06% 54.06%
SB21 3727 6700 10426 781 803 803 507 434 507 20.96% 11.99% 7.70% 64.92% 54.05% 63.14%
SB22 816 2368 3184 185 267 267 128 167 167 22.67% 11.28% 8.39% 69.19% 62.55% 62.55%
SB23 4627 6400 11027 677 663 677 347 369 369 14.63% 10.36% 6.14% 51.26% 55.66% 54.51%
SB24 1714 4838 6551 406 469 469 207 313 313 23.69% 9.69% 7.16% 50.99% 66.74% 66.74%
SB25 1317 3394 4711 269 394 394 137 229 229 20.43% 11.61% 8.36% 50.93% 58.12% 58.12%
SB25A 932 3456 4387 233 370 370 137 247 247 25.00% 10.71% 8.43% 58.80% 66.76% 66.76%
SB26 6086 12172 18257 1035 1209 1209 585 703 703 17.01% 9.93% 6.62% 56.52% 58.15% 58.15%
SB27 5628 9205 14832 804 933 933 486 550 550 14.29% 10.14% 6.29% 60.45% 58.95% 58.95%
SB28 3174 5857 9031 557 691 691 335 433 433 17.55% 11.80% 7.65% 60.14% 62.66% 62.66%
SB29 4279 9648 13927 903 1077 1077 593 582 616 21.10% 11.16% 7.73% 65.67% 54.04% 57.20%
SB30 4215 9364 13578 867 1036 1036 548 600 600 20.57% 11.06% 7.63% 63.21% 57.92% 57.92%
SITE Directional Factor (D)AADT (VPD) 2-WAY (VPH) 1-WAY (VPH) Peak Hour Factor (K)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element Task 3 & 4 Technical Memorandum CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOTable of Contents
Task 4: Forecast Future Travel Demand
4.1 Existing and Future Population and Employment Forecasts 1
4.2 Future Traffic Volumes for Existing Plus Committed Transportation Systems 13
Against the Capacity of the Existing Plus Committed Transportation Network
4.3 Future Capacity Deficiencies 31
4.4 Results of Forecasting Analysis 32
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 1Task 4: Forecast Future Travel Demand
4.1 Existing and Future Population and Employment Forecasts
Population Projections
The population projections for the City of Miami Beach are presented in Table 1 along with
projections for Minor Statistical Area 1.3. The City projections were obtained from the University of
)ORULGD·V6KLPEHUJ&HQWHUIRU$IIRUGDEOH+RXVLQJZKLFKPDLQWDLQVDKRXVLQJGDWDFOHDULQJKRXVH
Minor Statistical Areas are used in Miami-Dade County planning programs for presenting
demographic, housing, and economic data used in growth management and planning programs.
Area 1.3 is one of the 32 areas included in the County and includes all of Miami Beach and six
VPDOOHU PXQLFLSDOLWLHV RQ WKH FRDVW MXVW QRUWK RI WKH &LW\ 7KH &LW\·V VKDUH RI WKHMiami-Dade
County population projected for this Minor Statistical Area into the future is stable at about 80
SHUFHQWDOLWWOHORZHUWKDQWKHSHUFHQWUHSRUWHGLQWKH&HQVXV:KLOHWKH&LW\·VVKDUH
declines slightly over time, the population continues to grow in both, the City and the Minor
Statistical Area through the projection period.
The Miami-Dade County population projections by Minor Statistical Area are new numbers and
were recently adopted for planning purposes. The new numbers take into account the recent surge
in residential construction with appropriate provisions for high vacancy rates in those areas where
there are an excessive number of new units. Comparing the Shimberg Center projections to the
&RXQW\·VQXPEHUVVKRZVWKDWWKHSURMHFtions are consistent.
Note that projections are not predictions of the future. The future is essentially unknown, and more
so in these difficult years following the housing boom of the early 2000s. These projections are
based on the best available data, an analysis of recent trends, and an understanding of local
government growth management goals and policies. The slowing rate of population growth is a
reflection of the built-up status of the City. Vacant developable land is limited and future residential
development will require clearance and redevelopment.
7KH8QLYHUVLW\RI)ORULGD·V%XUHDXRI%XVLQHVVDQG(FRQRPLF5HVHDUFKUHSRUWHGWKH&LW\·V
population was 93,721. U.S. Census estimate for the same year showed a much lower figure of
85,036. The Census may have failed to account for the amount of recent residential development
in the City but the difference illustrates the difficulty of measuring housing changes in high density
neighborhoods undergoing rapid change and the uncertainty of the level and pace of future
growth.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 2Table 1
Population Estimates and Projections
Minor Statistical Area 1.3 and City of Miami Beach, 2000 to 2030
Year
Minor
Statistical
Area 1.3
City of
Miami
Beach
City as
Percent of
Area 1.3
1990 110,126 92,639 84%
2000 108,526 87,933 81%
2006 118,734 93,533 79%
2010 121,101 96,354 80%
2015 123,553 98,679 80%
2020 126,030 100,811 80%
2025 129,263 102,316 79%
2030 131,261 103,515 79%
1990-2000 (1,600) (4,706) 294%
2000-2006 10,208 5,600 55%
2006-2010 2,367 2,821 119%
2010-2015 2,452 2,325 95%
2015-2020 2,477 2,132 86%
2020-2025 3,233 1,505 47%
2025-2030 1,998 1,199 60%
Average Annual change
Source: U.S. Census for 1990 and 2000 data. Miami-Dade Planning & Zoning Dept. for Minor Statistical Area data for 2006-
2030.University of Florida, Shimberg Center for Miami Beach data for 2006-2030.
Note: Minor Statistical Area 1.3 includes the City of Miami Beach and five smaller municipalities: Bal Harbour, Bay Harbor Islands,
Indian Creek, North Bay Village, and Surfside with a combined 2007 population of 19,776 according to BEBR.
Employment Projections
Employment projection data were obtained from employment projections developed by the Miami-
Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning for transportation planning. These data are
presented by Traffic Analysis Zone, which are small areas designed for input into transportation
planning models. Again, the data are presented for the Minor Statistical Area and the City. These
data were developed in 2004 prior to the onset of the current housing market collapse and may
overstate future job growth in the near term. Compare the projected population for 2015 from
Table 1 with the projected persons in households in Table 2 for the same year. The transportation
files, which were developed in 2004, show a higher population than the more recent Shimberg
Center projection for the City.
The data are presented in a set of four tables, two for 2015 and two for 2030. Tables 2 and 3
present data for persons, vehicles and workers in households with and without children for 2015
and 2030, respectively. Tables 4 and 5 present data for employment classes used in transportation
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 3modeling. The projected employment is broken down into three industry categories: Industrial,
Commercial, and Service industries. The majority of the workers are employed in the Service
industries and very few in the Industrial class. The job growth is commensurate with the projected
population growth shown in these tables, but these data do not reflect the current economic
recession.
Figures 1 thru 5 present Census block group data concerning household auto ownership and
method of transportation to work (auto, bicycle, walking). This information will be useful for drafting
policies regarding transportation and parking policies.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 4Table 2
City of Miami Beach Workers and Persons in Households, by TAZ, 2015
2000 TAZ 2000 MSA
Households
Without
Children
Households
With Children
Vehicles in
Households
Without
Children
Vehicles in
Households
With Children
Workers in
Households
Without
Children
Workers in
Households
With Children
Persons in
Households
Without
Children
Persons in
Households
With Children
603 1.3 2,600 564 3,703 1,285 2,789 858 5,322 2,376
604 1.3 1,076 661 1,532 1,505 1,155 1,004 2,203 2,782
605 1.3 1,806 486 2,572 1,108 1,937 739 3,696 2,049
606 1.3 1,813 890 2,582 2,028 1,945 1,353 3,711 3,750
608 1.3 1,790 623 2,549 1,421 1,919 948 3,663 2,626
609 1.3 1,875 284 2,671 648 2,011 432 3,838 1,197
610 1.3 2,400 240 3,418 546 2,575 364 4,913 1,009
611 1.3 875 538 1,246 1,226 938 818 1,791 2,267
612 1.3 789 367 1,124 835 847 557 1,616 1,544
613 1.3 890 301 1,267 686 954 458 1,821 1,268
614 1.3 555 140 790 320 595 213 1,136 591
615 1.3 209 26 297 60 224 40 427 111
616 1.3 1,018 98 1,451 223 1,092 148 2,085 412
617 1.3 875 267 1,246 609 938 406 1,791 1,125
618 1.3 1,282 117 1,826 267 1,375 177 2,624 493
619 1.3 1,188 98 1,691 224 1,275 150 2,431 414
620 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
621 1.3 375 39 535 89 402 59 768 163
622 1.3 677 205 964 466 727 311 1,386 863
623 1.3 1,176 119 1,674 271 1,261 181 2,407 503
624 1.3 1,680 144 2,393 327 1,803 218 3,439 605
625 1.3 984 74 1,401 168 1,056 112 2,015 311
626 1.3 1,070 79 1,524 180 1,149 119 2,191 332
627 1.3 845 44 1,203 102 907 68 1,729 187
628 1.3 416 14 593 31 447 21 852 58
629 1.3 1,694 95 2,413 215 1,818 144 3,469 399
630 1.3 692 83 986 189 743 125 1,416 349
631 1.3 1,855 137 2,642 313 1,990 209 3,797 578
632 1.3 1,306 111 1,860 252 1,401 169 2,674 467
633 1.3 277 89 394 204 297 135 567 375
634 1.3 542 289 772 659 581 440 1,109 1,219
635 1.3 350 54 499 122 376 82 717 227
636 1.3 1,711 168 2,437 382 1,836 254 3,503 707
637 1.3 1,564 90 2,227 205 1,677 138 3,201 380
638 1.3 493 37 702 86 528 57 1,008 158
639 1.3 845 16 1,203 37 907 25 1,729 69
640 1.3 274 27 391 62 294 41 561 115
641 1.3 266 20 379 46 285 30 544 85
642 1.3 492 28 699 65 527 43 1,006 120
643 1.3 1,280 31 1,823 71 1,374 47 2,620 131
Total 41,905 7,693 59,679 17,533 44,955 11,693 85,776 32,415
Totals 49,598 77,212 56,648 118,191
Source: Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, TAZ Data Set, 2008.
.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 5Table 3
City of Miami Beach Workers and Persons in Households, by TAZ, 2030
2000 TAZ 2000 MSA
Number of
Households
Without
Children
Number of
Households
With
Children
Vehicles in
Households
Without
Children
Vehicles in
Households
With Children
Workers in
Households
Without
Children
Workers in
Households
With Children
Persons in
Households
Without
Children
Persons in
Households
With Children
603 1.3 2,917 643 4,155 1,465 3,129 977 5,971 2,708
604 1.3 1,200 742 1,709 1,691 1,287 1,128 2,457 3,125
605 1.3 2,013 549 2,866 1,251 2,159 835 4,120 2,313
606 1.3 2,175 1,079 3,097 2,458 2,333 1,640 4,452 4,544
608 1.3 2,199 776 3,132 1,767 2,360 1,180 4,502 3,269
609 1.3 2,089 324 2,975 738 2,241 492 4,277 1,365
610 1.3 2,785 287 3,966 653 2,987 437 5,701 1,209
611 1.3 988 612 1,407 1,394 1,059 930 2,023 2,577
612 1.3 895 421 1,275 959 960 639 1,832 1,773
613 1.3 991 340 1,411 774 1,063 516 2,029 1,432
614 1.3 645 165 918 376 692 251 1,320 695
615 1.3 304 40 433 91 327 60 623 168
616 1.3 1,169 116 1,665 264 1,254 176 2,393 489
617 1.3 1,021 316 1,454 720 1,095 480 2,090 1,331
618 1.3 1,453 137 2,070 313 1,559 209 2,975 577
619 1.3 1,445 124 2,058 282 1,550 188 2,958 522
620 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
621 1.3 434 46 618 105 466 70 888 194
622 1.3 790 243 1,125 553 848 369 1,617 1,023
623 1.3 1,191 125 1,696 285 1,278 191 2,438 526
624 1.3 1,932 172 2,751 392 2,072 262 3,955 724
625 1.3 1,126 89 1,603 202 1,209 135 2,305 375
626 1.3 1,226 94 1,746 214 1,315 142 2,509 395
627 1.3 1,005 56 1,431 127 1,078 86 2,057 236
628 1.3 570 20 811 46 612 30 1,167 84
629 1.3 1,915 113 2,727 257 2,054 171 3,920 476
630 1.3 817 100 1,163 227 877 152 1,673 421
631 1.3 2,207 170 3,143 386 2,368 258 4,518 716
632 1.3 1,709 150 2,434 342 1,834 228 3,498 632
633 1.3 308 101 439 230 330 153 631 426
634 1.3 638 343 909 782 685 521 1,306 1,445
635 1.3 400 63 570 143 429 95 819 266
636 1.3 1,928 195 2,746 444 2,069 297 3,947 821
637 1.3 1,760 107 2,507 243 1,889 163 3,602 450
638 1.3 560 44 798 100 601 66 1,147 186
639 1.3 1,012 23 1,441 53 1,086 35 2,071 97
640 1.3 363 37 517 84 389 57 743 156
641 1.3 370 30 526 68 396 46 757 127
642 1.3 758 47 1,079 108 814 71 1,551 198
643 1.3 1,285 35 1,830 80 1,379 53 2,630 147
Total 1.3 48,593 9,074 69,201 20,667 52,133 13,789 99,472 38,218
Totals 57,667 89,868 65,922 137,690
Source: Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, TAZ Data Set, 2008.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 6Table 4
City of Miami Beach Employment Projections, 2015 by TAZ
2000 TAZ 2000 MSA
Traffic
Analysis
Super
Districts
2000
Traffic
Analysis
Districts
2015 Ind.
Employment
2015 Comm
Employment
2015 Serv.
Employment
Total 2015
Employment
603 1.3 2 4 - 61 85 146
604 1.3 2 4 3 6 34 43
605 1.3 1 3 - 410 634 1,044
606 1.3 2 4 - 56 110 166
608 1.3 2 4 32 99 323 454
609 1.3 1 3 26 666 878 1,570
610 1.3 1 3 23 156 1,580 1,759
611 1.3 1 3 18 21 659 698
612 1.3 1 3 139 205 11,353 11,697
613 1.3 1 3 7 401 1,254 1,662
614 1.3 1 3 3 19 763 785
615 1.3 1 3 11 307 3,604 3,922
616 1.3 1 2 - 67 1,226 1,293
617 1.3 1 2 3 259 925 1,187
618 1.3 1 2 - 184 1,584 1,768
619 1.3 1 2 19 395 1,183 1,597
620 1.3 1 2 2 - 3,300 3,302
621 1.3 1 2 7 94 191 292
622 1.3 1 2 145 623 612 1,380
623 1.3 1 2 24 20 214 258
624 1.3 1 2 19 429 165 613
625 1.3 1 2 22 649 1,263 1,934
626 1.3 1 2 33 572 881 1,486
627 1.3 1 2 140 866 2,418 3,424
628 1.3 1 2 34 267 1,089 1,390
629 1.3 1 2 4 178 491 673
630 1.3 1 2 - 122 377 499
631 1.3 1 2 16 235 265 516
632 1.3 1 2 34 30 2,506 2,570
633 1.3 1 2 1 1 76 78
634 1.3 1 2 - 191 601 792
635 1.3 1 2 17 1,076 307 1,400
636 1.3 1 2 6 19 273 298
637 1.3 1 2 3 68 330 401
638 1.3 1 2 9 1,424 634 2,067
639 1.3 1 2 19 328 703 1,050
640 1.3 1 2 36 101 56 193
641 1.3 1 2 - 535 86 621
642 1.3 1 2 10 984 618 1,612
643 1.3 1 2 - 2 5 7
Total 865 12,126 43,656 56,647
Source: Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, TAZ Data Set, 2008.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 7Table 5
City of Miami Beach Employment Projections, 2030 by TAZ
2000 TAZ 2000 MSA
Traffic
Analysis
Super
Districts
2000 Traffic
Analysis
Districts
2030 Ind.
Employment
2030 Comm
Employment
2030 Serv.
Employment
Total 2030
Employment
603 1.3 2.0 4.0 - 82 88 170
604 1.3 2.0 4.0 3 8 35 46
605 1.3 1.0 3.0 - 549 657 1,206
606 1.3 2.0 4.0 - 75 114 189
608 1.3 2.0 4.0 31 133 335 499
609 1.3 1.0 3.0 25 892 910 1,827
610 1.3 1.0 3.0 22 209 1,638 1,869
611 1.3 1.0 3.0 17 28 683 728
612 1.3 1.0 3.0 133 274 11,772 12,179
613 1.3 1.0 3.0 7 537 1,300 1,844
614 1.3 1.0 3.0 3 25 791 819
615 1.3 1.0 3.0 11 411 3,737 4,159
616 1.3 1.0 2.0 - 90 1,271 1,361
617 1.3 1.0 2.0 3 347 959 1,309
618 1.3 1.0 2.0 - 246 1,642 1,888
619 1.3 1.0 2.0 18 529 1,227 1,774
620 1.3 1.0 2.0 2 - 3,422 3,424
621 1.3 1.0 2.0 7 126 198 331
622 1.3 1.0 2.0 139 834 635 1,608
623 1.3 1.0 2.0 23 27 222 272
624 1.3 1.0 2.0 18 574 171 763
625 1.3 1.0 2.0 21 869 1,310 2,200
626 1.3 1.0 2.0 32 766 913 1,711
627 1.3 1.0 2.0 134 1,160 2,507 3,801
628 1.3 1.0 2.0 32 358 1,129 1,519
629 1.3 1.0 2.0 4 238 509 751
630 1.3 1.0 2.0 - 163 391 554
631 1.3 1.0 2.0 15 315 275 605
632 1.3 1.0 2.0 32 40 2,598 2,670
633 1.3 1.0 2.0 1 1 79 81
634 1.3 1.0 2.0 - 256 623 879
635 1.3 1.0 2.0 16 2,319 672 3,007
636 1.3 1.0 2.0 6 35 283 324
637 1.3 1.0 2.0 3 91 342 436
638 1.3 1.0 2.0 9 1,907 657 2,573
639 1.3 1.0 2.0 18 465 729 1,212
640 1.3 1.0 2.0 34 135 58 227
641 1.3 1.0 2.0 - 716 89 805
642 1.3 1.0 2.0 10 1,432 641 2,083
643 1.3 1.0 2.0 - 3 18 21
Total 829 17,265 45,630 63,724
Source: Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, TAZ Data Set, 2008.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 8Figure 1
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 9Figure 2
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 10Figure 3
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 11Figure 4
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 12Figure 5
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 134.2 Future Traffic Volumes for Existing Plus Committed Transportation Systems
Against the Capacity of the Existing Plus Committed Transportation
Network
Forecasted Year 2015 and 2030 Conditions
The year 2008 traffic volumes were projected to the years 2015 and 2030 using growth factors
developed from the Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to coincide
with regional planning horizons. SpecLILFDOO\JURZWKIDFWRUVZHUHREWDLQHGXVLQJWKH032·V\HDU
2000 and 2015 networks and applied to the current year 2008 traffic volumes to obtain the year
2015 volumes. Year 2030 forecasted traffic volumes were computed by using growth factors
developed frRPWKH032·V\HDUDQGQHWZRUNVDQGDSSOLHGWRWKHSUHYLRXVO\REWDLQHG
year 2015 traffic volumes. Growth factors were compared with those obtained from the FDOT
traffic projections data base; and, if the FDOT was greater than the MPO growth rates, the FDOT
growth rate was then used.
The roadways within the City of Miami Beach Transportation Network can be expected to
experience relative minor growth while local street growth will be limited because of the low
percentage of developable land still available in the City. Population growth and development
outside the City limits will largely contribute to the minor projected growth in traffic volume on the
arterials. The Miami-'DGH032·VWUDIILFYROXPHVUHYLHZODQGXVHSRWHQWLDOODQGXVHFKDQJHVDQG
potential development to evaluate the adequacy of historical growth rates to reflect future growth.
The Corradino Group believes that the growth rates developed by the MDC MPO are conservative
and include the expected growth within the City of Miami Beach. Traffic volume projections by the
MPO adopted transportation plan network are widely accepted by professional practice including
the federal government and FDOT.
Review of planned projects in the 2009 TIP and the adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan
(LRTP) years 2000, 2015 and 2030 reveal that no capacity improvement projects will affect the
roadways geometry and traffic volumes due to programmed roadway widening projects within as
well as near the City and other major projects such as other transportation projects throughout the
&LW\7DEOHVDQGVKRZWKHSURJUDPPHGSURMHFWVLQWKH7,3DQGWKHSULRULWLHVIURPWKH032·V
Long Range Transportation Plan.
Tables 8 through 12 and Figures 6 through 10 depict the results of the analyses for the Years 2015
and 2030.
In summary, examination of all the tables and maps in this technical memo indicates which
roadways are operating at the adopted or worse level of service and how these will deteriorate
throughout Miami Beach.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 14Planned Projects (Existing Plus Committed Network)
The Miami-'DGH 0HWURSROLWDQ 3ODQQLQJ 2UJDQL]DWLRQ·V 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ ,PSURYHPHQW
Program (TIP) and the 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) were reviewed for projects that
would affect the capacity carrying capacity of the roadways of the City of Miami Beach.
Review of Tables 9 and 10 reveals that projects programmed within the City of Miami Beach
include ITS, transit, bicycle and pedestrian in nature will improve operations and reduce vehicles
(modal shift from single occupant vehicles to multi-occupancy vehicles, transit, bicycles, etc) on the
roadway system thus improving capacity and level of service. These projects can help improve
capacity by shifting mode from personal vehicle to alternative transportation modes. Projects
included as Priority I and/or in the TIP are considered part of the Committed Network for the future
analysis years.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 15Table 6 ¥Miami Dade MPO 2009 TIP (Committed Projects)
MPO # Facility Limits Type of Improvement
Contstruction
Year
DT4180788 (ADA) STRUCTRE
RELOC Miami Beach DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS N/A
DT4146351 SR A1A/MCARTHUR
CSWY
Ramp to Watson Island to
East of Terminal Island RESURFACING 2009
DT4146361 SR A1A/MCARTHUR
CSWY West Ave. to Collins Ave.RESURFACING 2010
DT2499111 SR 907/ALTON ROAD 5th St to Michigan Ave. RESURFACING N/A
DT2499112 SR 907/ALTON ROAD 5th St to Michigan Ave.
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
RECONSTRUCT.N/A
DT2502361 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE.5th St to Espanola Way
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
RECONSTRUCT.2012
DT2512691 VENETIAN CSWY Bayshore Dr. to Purdy Ave. LANDSCAPING 2009
DT4180671 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE 15th St to N of Lincoln Rd. RESURFACING 2009
DT4105811 VENETIAN CSWY HWY- ENHANCEMENT 2009
DT4209101 WEST AVE.
Brdg from N of Lincoln Rd
to S of 18th St
NEW BRIDGE
CONSTRUCTION N/A
DT2512511 DADE BLVD
BIKE/PED IMPROVEMENTS BIKE PATH/TRAIL 2009
DT4182387 SR 907/ALTON ROAD 5th St to 17th St
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT 2009
DT4213761 HOOD TRAIL
N of 5th St to S of Dade
Blvd.BIKE PATH/TRAIL 2009
DT2496872 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE.22nd St to 24th St DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS 2010
DT4055784 SR 112/I-195
Biscayne Waterway to SR
907/Alton Rd.RESURFACING 2009
DT4180891 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE
S of 26th St to Indian Creek
Dr.RESURFACING 2010
PW000622 WASHINGTON AVE
BRDG Over Collins Canal BRIDGE REPAIRS N/A
PW0000175 PINETREE DR BRDG Over Flamingo Waterway BRIDGE REPAIRS N/A
PW671804 DADE BLVD/23 ST
BRDG Over Collins Canal BRIDGE REPAIRS N/A
DT2512713 N.BEACH REC
CORRIDOR 53rd St to 64th St BIKE PATH/TRAIL 2009
DT4182386 SR 112/41 ST
SR 907/Alton Rd to Pine
Tree Dr.
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT 2009
DT4198241 SR 112/A GODFREY
RD
SR 907/Alton Rd to
COLLINS AVE RESURFACING 2012
DT4198231 SR A1A/HARDING
AVE.
Bal Harbor Shop to
Entrance 94th St RESURFACING 2011
DT4198581
SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE
150' N of 75 St to Harding
Ave RESURFACING 2012
DT4180951 SR 934/NORMANDY
DR
Rue Notre Dame to Bay Dr
East RESURFACING 2010
DT4198251 SR 934/NW/NE 71ST
Bay Dr to SR A1A/Collins
Ave RESURFACING 2010
DT4226161 SR 934/NORMANDY
DR
W of Bay Dr to Rue Norte
Dame RESURFACING 2011
DT4226171 SR 934/71 ST W of Bay Dr to Bay Dr East RESURFACING 2011
DT4198601 SR A1A/HARDING
AVE 75 St to Indian Creek Dr. RESURFACING 2012
DT2495612 SR A1A/HARDING
AVE NE 87 St to NE 96 St MISCELLANEOUS
CONSTRUCTION 2009
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 16Table 7 ¥Miami Dade MPO 2030 LRTP
Project Roadway Limits Project Description
Miami Beach Transit
HUB
17 St. Lincoln
Rd/Washington Ave.Transit HUB
SR A1A / Collins Ave /
Alton Rd Corridor 5 St to Lehman Causeway
ITS (Includes CCTV, Roadway
Sensors, Arterial Dynamic
Message Signs, Wireless Comm)
79 St HEFT to A1A
ITS (Includes CCTV, Roadway
Sensors, Arterial Dynamic
Message Signs, Wireless Comm)Priority IIIBay Link Downtown Miami to Miami
Beach Light Rail Transit
Bay Link Extension Dade Blvd to 79 St Light Rail Transit
Beach/ A1A 81 St to Miami-Dade
Broward Line Premium TransitPriority IV (Un-Funded)Priority IISource: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 17Table 8 ¥2015 Peak-Hour, Peak-Direction Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 250 D 270
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 430 D 90
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 680 F -40
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 220 D 300
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 470 C 1,840
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 1,640 4U 560 1,090 1,260 CITY COLLECTOR 780 D 860
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 3,500 6D 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1160 D 2340
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 340 C 1370
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1560 D 170
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1100 D 630
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 2000 F -270
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 STATE ARTERIAL 670 D 130
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 CITY COLLECTOR 220 C 580
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 STATE ARTERIAL 520 D 280
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 1,710 4U 490 1,140 1,290 STATE ARTERIAL 790 D 920
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 730 C 1580
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 940 C 1370
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 3,350 6D 2,720 2,790 2,790 STATE ARTERIAL 3300 D 50
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,500 6D 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1420 D 2080
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 440 D 80
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 550 D 90
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 190 C 330
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 410 D 110
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 350 D 290
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 260 C 1450
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 740 D 970
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 580 C 1130
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 1,640 4U 560 1,090 1,260 CITY COLLECTOR 470 C 1170
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 680 F -40
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 660 E -20
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 2690 F -960
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 1,710 4D 1,360 1,710 1,800 STATE ARTERIAL 2320 F -610
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 1,860 4D 1,810 1,860 1,860 STATE ARTERIAL 1870 F -10
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 1,820 4U 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1880 F -60
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, ONE WAY NB 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1040 D 1,760
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 2,100 6D 770 1,750 1,940 STATE ARTERIAL 1650 D 450
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 940 D 430
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 1,370 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 360 C 1010
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1030 D 340
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 420 D 100
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 170 C 350
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 940 D 880
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 700 D 1030
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2270 D 530
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1430 D 1370
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2090 D 710
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 1,820 4D 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1510 D 310
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1760 D 1040
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1690 D 1,110
LANES
ADJUSTED
STANDARD FUNC CLASSJURIS
SITESTREET
SEGMENT ADOPTED
AVAIL
TRIPS
PEAK DIR
LOS
2015
TRIPS
**UU ==UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,,DD ==DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 18Figure 6 2015 Peak Hour Level of Service (One-Way)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 19Existing Intermodal Terminals
Figure 15 shows all of the intermodal facilities located in Miami Dade County. These facilities are
accessible through Metrobus service from the City. In addition to these intermodal terminals there are
several park and ride locations along the Metrorail and Tri Rail service. These park and ride locations
are accessible through Metrobus service from the City.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 20Figure 15 ²Existing Intermodal Terminals
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 21Table 9 ¥2015 Peak-Hour, Two-Way Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 410 D 510
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 720 D 200
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1100 D 40
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 350 C 570
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,930 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 900 C 3030
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 1320 D 1,640
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2020 D 4340
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 470 C 2640
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 2930 D 220
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1950 D 1200
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3660 F -510
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1220 D 220
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 CITY COLLECTOR 360 C 1080
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 970 D 470
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 3,110 4U 890 2,070 2,340 STATE ARTERIAL 1380 D 1730
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1360 C 2860
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1750 C 2470
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 6,100 6D 4,950 5,080 5,080 STATE ARTERIAL 6170 F -70
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2640 D 3720
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 810 D 110
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 870 D 270
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 300 C 620
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 750 D 170
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 520 D 620
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 440 C 2670
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1270 D 1840
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 990 C 2120
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 740 C 2220
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1180 E -40
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1140 D 0
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3460 F -310
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 4260 F -1510
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3430 F -680
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,300 4U 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3430 F -130
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A/ONE-WAY PAIR NB, 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1040 D 1760
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,820 6D 1,390 3,180 3,520 STATE ARTERIAL 3030 D 790
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 940 D 430
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 2,490 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 550 C 1940
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1030 D 340
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 440 D 480
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 310 C 610
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 940 D 880
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1290 D 1860
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2270 D 530
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1430 D 1370
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2090 D 710
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 3,300 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 2040 D 1260
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1760 D 1040
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1690 D 1110
AVAIL
TRIPS
2-WAY
LOS
2015
TRIPSSTREET
ADJUSTED
STANDARD
SITEFUNC CLASSJURIS
SEGMENT ADOPTED
LANES
**UU ==UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,,DD ==DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 22Figure 7 2015 Peak Hour Level of Service (Two-Way)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 23Table 10 -2015 Daily Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 6,980 D 2,620
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 11,540 F -1940
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 22,970 F -10970
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 6,360 D 3240
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 13,340 C 30990
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 30,930 4U 10,550 20,620 23,940 CITY COLLECTOR 25,400 D 5,530
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 67,050 6D 19,500 44,700 49,300 STATE ARTERIAL 37,270 D 29,780
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 6,820 C 25730
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 49,290 F -16330
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 33,600 F -640
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 59,740 F -26780
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 STATE ARTERIAL 17,030 F -1910
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 CITY COLLECTOR 4,820 D 10300
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 STATE ARTERIAL 20,280 F -5160
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 32,520 4U 9,300 21,680 24,600 STATE ARTERIAL 32,340 D 180
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 27,190 D 17140
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 30,830 D 13500
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 64,200 6D 52,100 53,500 53,500 STATE ARTERIAL 99,230 F -35030
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 67,050 6D 19,500 44,700 49,300 STATE ARTERIAL 42,230 D 24820
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 11,000 F -1400
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 13,430 F -1430
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 4,200 D 5400
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 14,510 F -4910
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 8,630 D 3370
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 6,210 C 26340
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 21,640 D 10910
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 18,240 D 14310
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 30,930 4U 10,550 20,620 23,940 CITY COLLECTOR 10,590 D 20340
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 18,320 F -6320
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 17,860 F -5860
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 45,550 F -12590
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 32,700 4D 26,000 32,700 34,500 STATE ARTERIAL 60,820 F -28120
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 35,700 4D 34,700 35,700 35,700 STATE ARTERIAL 53,230 F -17530
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 34,680 4U 12,400 28,900 32,800 STATE ARTERIAL 44,800 F -10120
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, ONE WAY NB 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 17,290 D 14900
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 40,240 6D 14,630 33,530 36,980 STATE ARTERIAL 43,590 F -3350
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 7,200 2 2,880 6,000 7,560 CITY COLLECTOR 9,310 F -2110
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 26,040 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 7,320 C 18720
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 7,200 2 2,880 6,000 7,560 CITY COLLECTOR 20,810 F -13610
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 4,090 D 5510
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 3,300 C 6300
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 20,810 2 7,440 17,340 19,680 STATE ARTERIAL 15,720 D 5090
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 20,530 D 12430
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 33,090 F -900
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 20,130 D 12060
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 29,840 D 2350
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 34,680 4D 12,400 28,900 32,800 STATE ARTERIAL 34,240 D 440
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 24,240 D 7950
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 23,820 D 8370
SEGMENT ADOPTED
LANES
ADJUSTED
SITEROADWAY AVAIL
TRIPS
DAILY
LOS
2030
TRIPSFUNC CLASSJURIS
**UU ==UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,,DD ==DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 24Page 24Figure 3 -2015 Daily Level of Service (Two-Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 25Table 13 - 2030 Peak-Hour Peak-Direction Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 370 D 150
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 560 F -40
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 1050 F -410
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 320 D 200
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 550 C 1,760
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 1,640 4U 560 1,090 1,260 CITY COLLECTOR 1070 D 570
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 3,500 6D 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1370 D 2130
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 390 C 1320
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1770 F -40
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 1250 D 480
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 2620 F -890
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 STATE ARTERIAL 760 D 40
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 CITY COLLECTOR 230 C 570
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 800 2U 230 530 650 STATE ARTERIAL 640 D 160
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 1,710 4U 490 1,140 1,290 STATE ARTERIAL 1120 D 590
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 1030 C 1280
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 2,310 4U 1,070 1,540 1,640 CITY ARTERIAL 1170 D 1140
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 3,350 6D 2,720 2,790 2,790 STATE ARTERIAL 3780 F -430
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,500 6D 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1620 D 1880
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 510 D 10
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 670 F -30
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 230 D 290
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 500 D 20
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 430 D 210
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 320 C 1390
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 850 D 860
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,710 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 680 D 1030
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 1,640 4U 560 1,090 1,260 CITY COLLECTOR 520 C 1120
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 820 F -180
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 640 2U 250 530 660 CITY COLLECTOR 800 F -160
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 3120 F -1390
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 1,710 4D 1,360 1,710 1,800 STATE ARTERIAL 2660 F -950
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 1,860 4D 1,810 1,860 1,860 STATE ARTERIAL 2330 F -470
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 1,820 4U 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 2060 F -240
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, ONE WAY NB 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1270 D 1530
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 2,100 6D 770 1,750 1,940 STATE ARTERIAL 1910 D 190
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1180 D 190
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 1,370 4D 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 430 C 940
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1320 D 50
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 590 F -70
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 520 2U 200 430 530 CITY COLLECTOR 210 D 310
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1040 D 780
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 1,730 4U 620 1,440 1,640 STATE ARTERIAL 910 D 820
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2660 D 140
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1620 D 1180
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2400 D 400
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 1,820 4D 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1970 F -150
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2080 D 720
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1990 D 810
SEGMENT ADOPTED
ADJUSTED
STANDARD
ROADWAY
SITELANES AVAIL
TRIPS
PEAK DIR
LOS
2030
TRIPSFUNC CLASSJURIS
**UU ==UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,,DD ==DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 26
Figure 8 - 2030 Level of Service (One-Way)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 27Table 11 -2030 Peak-Hour, Two-Way Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 610 D 310
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 930 E -10
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1700 F -560
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 500 D 420
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,930 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 CITY COLLECTOR 1050 C 2880
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 1810 D 1,150
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2380 D 3980
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 540 C 2570
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3320 F -170
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 2220 D 930
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 4800 F -1650
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1380 D 60
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 CITY COLLECTOR 380 C 1060
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1190 D 250
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 3,110 4U 890 2,070 2,340 STATE ARTERIAL 1950 D 1160
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1920 C 2300
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 2180 D 2040
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 6,100 6D 4,950 5,080 5,080 STATE ARTERIAL 7070 F -970
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 3010 D 3350
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 930 E -10
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1050 D 90
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 370 D 550
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 910 D 10
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 630 D 510
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 530 C 2580
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1450 D 1660
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1160 D 1950
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 820 C 2140
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1430 F -290
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1380 F -240
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 4010 F -860
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 4880 F -2130
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 4280 F -1530
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,300 4U 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3750 F -450
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A/ONE-WAY PAIR NB, 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1270 D 1530
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,820 6D 1,390 3,180 3,520 STATE ARTERIAL 3510 D 310
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1180 D 190
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 2,490 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 650 C 1840
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1320 D 50
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 620 D 300
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 380 D 540
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1040 D 780
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1670 D 1480
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2660 D 140
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1620 D 1180
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2400 D 400
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 3,300 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 2650 D 650
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2080 D 720
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1990 D 810
2030
TRIPS
2-WAY
LOS
AVAIL
TRIPS
ADJUSTED
STANDARDROADWAY
SITEJURIS FUNC CLASS
SEGMENT ADOPTED
LANES
**UU ==UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,,DD ==DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 28
Figure 9 - 2030 Level of Service (Two-Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 29Table 12 -2030 Daily Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 6,980 D 2,620
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 11,540 F -1940
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 22,970 F -10970
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 6,360 D 3240
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 13,340 C 30990
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 30,930 4U 10,550 20,620 23,940 CITY COLLECTOR 25,400 D 5,530
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 67,050 6D 19,500 44,700 49,300 STATE ARTERIAL 37,270 D 29,780
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 6,820 C 25730
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 49,290 F -16330
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 33,600 F -640
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 59,740 F -26780
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 STATE ARTERIAL 17,030 F -1910
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 CITY COLLECTOR 4,820 D 10300
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 15,120 2U 4,240 10,080 12,400 STATE ARTERIAL 20,280 F -5160
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 32,520 4U 9,300 21,680 24,600 STATE ARTERIAL 32,340 D 180
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 27,190 D 17140
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 44,330 4U 20,330 29,550 31,260 CITY ARTERIAL 30,830 D 13500
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 64,200 6D 52,100 53,500 53,500 STATE ARTERIAL 99,230 F -35030
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 67,050 6D 19,500 44,700 49,300 STATE ARTERIAL 42,230 D 24820
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 11,000 F -1400
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 13,430 F -1430
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 4,200 D 5400
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 14,510 F -4910
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 8,630 D 3370
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 6,210 C 26340
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 21,640 D 10910
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 32,550 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 18,240 D 14310
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 30,930 4U 10,550 20,620 23,940 CITY COLLECTOR 10,590 D 20340
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 18,320 F -6320
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 12,000 2U 4,800 10,000 12,600 CITY COLLECTOR 17,860 F -5860
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 45,550 F -12590
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 32,700 4D 26,000 32,700 34,500 STATE ARTERIAL 60,820 F -28120
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 35,700 4D 34,700 35,700 35,700 STATE ARTERIAL 53,230 F -17530
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 34,680 4U 12,400 28,900 32,800 STATE ARTERIAL 44,800 F -10120
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, ONE WAY NB 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 17,290 D 14900
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 40,240 6D 14,630 33,530 36,980 STATE ARTERIAL 43,590 F -3350
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 7,200 2 2,880 6,000 7,560 CITY COLLECTOR 9,310 F -2110
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 26,040 4D 11,100 21,700 25,200 CITY COLLECTOR 7,320 C 18720
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 7,200 2 2,880 6,000 7,560 CITY COLLECTOR 20,810 F -13610
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 4,090 D 5510
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 9,600 2U 3,840 8,000 10,080 CITY COLLECTOR 3,300 C 6300
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 20,810 2 7,440 17,340 19,680 STATE ARTERIAL 15,720 D 5090
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 32,960 4U 11,780 27,460 31,160 STATE ARTERIAL 20,530 D 12430
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 33,090 F -900
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 20,130 D 12060
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 29,840 D 2350
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 34,680 4D 12,400 28,900 32,800 STATE ARTERIAL 34,240 D 440
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 24,240 D 7950
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 32,190 3 11,700 26,820 29,580 STATE ARTERIAL 23,820 D 8370
SEGMENT ADOPTED
LANES
ADJUSTED
SITEROADWAY AVAIL
TRIPS
DAILY
LOS
2030
TRIPSFUNC CLASSJURIS
**UU ==UUNNDDIIVVIIDDEEDD,,DD ==DDIIVVIIDDEEDD
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 30
Figure 10 - 2030 Daily Level of Service (Two-Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 314.3 Future Capacity Deficiencies
As discussed in Section 4.2, the years 2015 and 2030 were selected as the analysis years to be
compatible with the current MPO Long Range Transportation Plan networks. The performed
analyses incorporates the highest peak hour volumes for that specific facility based on their highest
peak-hour K factor obtained either from collected data or from FDOT sources. Review of the above
tables reveals that by the Year 2015 the following roadways may be worse than the adopted
acceptable levels of service during either the one- and two-way highest peak hour periods.
South Beach:
15th Street between West Avenue and Meridian Road;
Alton Road between 15th Street and Dade Boulevard;
MacArthur Causeway between Fountain Street and Alton Road;
West Avenue between 5th and 15th Streets;
West Avenue between 15th Street and Dade Boulevard;
Middle Beach:
63rd Street between Alton Road and Indian Creek Drive;
Alton Road between Dade Boulevard and 41st Street;
Alton Road between 41st Street and 63rd Street;
Arthur Godfrey/41st Street between Alton Road and Indian Creek Drive;
Review of the above tables reveal that by the Year 2030 the following roadways may be worse than
the adopted acceptable levels of service during either the one- and two-way peak hour periods.
South Beach:
11th Street between Meridian Road and Ocean Drive;
15th Street between West Avenue and Meridian Road;
Alton Road between 5th and 11th Streets;
Alton Road between 15th Street and Dade Boulevard;
MacArthur Causeway between Fountain Street and Alton Road;
Meridian Road between 5th and 17th Streets;
Meridian between 17th Street and Dade Boulevard;
West Avenue between 5th and 15th Streets;
West Avenue between 15th and Dade Boulevard;
Middle Beach:
63rd Street between Alton Road and Indian Creek Drive;
Alton Road between Dade Boulevard and 41st Street;
Alton Road between 41st Street and 63rd Street;
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 32Arthur Godfrey/41st Street between Alton Road and Indian Creek Drive;
Prairie Avenue between Dade Boulevard and 44th Street;
North Beach:
Indian Creek Drive between 63rd and 71st Streets.
4.4 Results of Forecasting Analysis
As the result of the analyses and the information compiled during the development of Tasks 3 and
4, a set of guidelines to identify potential transportation improvements were developed for the next
task (Task 5 Develop Transportation System Alternatives). These are meant to be discussed at the
next Project Management meeting, which is expected to collect feedback and provide a list of
improvements. Additionally the improvements are subject to further analyses and public input.
Mitigate the needs identified in the analysis for existing, 2015 and 2030, prioritizing by
horizon year.
Warrant studies at potential locations for traffic signals;
Implementing one-way roadway network system that would increase the capacity and
operations of roads;
Capacity/LOS analysis at selected signalized intersections to improve signal phasing and
timing and provide increased pedestrian safety;
Investigate the availability of right-of-way width or redevelopment opportunities to
incorporated geometric, safety and/or multimodal improvements where appropriate. These
improvements refer to additional area for sidewalks, transit amenities, potential bicycle
lanes, turn lanes, transition areas, etc.
Remove on-street parking to add more lanes, identifying location for additional off-street
parking;
Traffic calming studies to determine potential of reducing residential neighborhood
vehicular intrusion and improve quality of life;
Detailed transit studies to improve existing bus routes and schedules, headways and
coverage;
Perform transit circulator study to identify those areas for additional localized transit service;
Perform study to identify potential locations for park-and-ride facilities throughout the City;
Determine routes and locations to enhance the bicycle path and pedestrian network.
Develop and implement Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) projects, programs and policies.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOPage 33Conclusion
A review of the existing plus committed network against the capacity of the transportation network
reveals that the main north-south corridors such as Collins Avenue, Alton Road and West Avenue
will require improvements to mitigate the level of service deficiencies. Additionally, other main east-
west corridors such as 11th and 15th Streets will require special attention. Likewise there also appear
to be opportunities to improve some of the bus routes by reducing headways and potential for
additional coverage.
The identified deficiencies from Tasks 3 and 4 reports will be further analyzed as part of Task 5 ²
Develop Transportation System Alternatives. Task 5 will identify transportation system alternatives
that address short and long term capacity deficiencies, connectivity and safety concerns. These
alternatives will include low-cost, easy to implement operational improvements, include all modes
of transportation and will comply with established goals and objectives.
As part of Task 5 activities, existing as well future programmed transportation improvement projects
and programs will be taken into consideration when developing the overall proposed
LPSURYHPHQWV 'RFXPHQWV VXFK DV WKH &LW\·V &DSLWDO ,PSURYHPHQW(OHPHQW WKH 032·V
Transportation Improvement Program and the Long Range Transportation Plan will be reviewed as
part of this process.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINOTable of Contents
Task 5: Development of Transportation System Alternatives
5.1 Introduction 1
5.2 Safety Analysis 2
5.3 Pedestrians and Bicycle Needs Assessment 2
5.4 Transit Facilities Need Assessment 11
5.5 Roadway Needs Assessment 15
5.6 Evaluation of Proposed Improvements 16
5.7 Conclusion 16
Appendicies
Appendix A – Crash Summary Forms
Appendix B – Previous Studies
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 1Task 5: Development of Transportation
System Alternatives
5.1 Introduction
This technical memorandum addresses the development of transportation system alternatives that
include short and long term capacity deficiencies, connectivity, and safety concerns.
Over the past decade there have been numerous studies and projects that have been performed to
help study and improve all forms of mobility in and around the City of Miami Beach. The results of
these studies have developed the transportation network that exists today within the City of Miami
beach and it will likely continue to shape the network for years to come.
Miami Beach has proven itself as one of the most progressive communities in the State of Florida,
particularly in the area of transportation. In a diverse community like Miami Beach, balance must be
sought to serve the various methods that provide mobility. Ultimately the goal is to more efficiently
and effectively utilize the transportation network.
Roadway centered physical capacity for automobiles will no longer serve the demand. Additionally,
there is less federal funding and incentive for these types of projects. Yet, with an immature transit
system an immediate jump to rail projects such as Metrorail is impractical. The solution lies in
increasing alternative mode usage and balancing the Auto/Alternative Mode modal split.
Miami Beach is poised to make this shift. It is dense, compact and mixed in use. A single mode of
travel cannot supply enough capacity nor serve the needs of its users. Yet, if a variety of modes were
effectively utilized, providing travel alternatives, the system would function in an improved manner.
There are opportunities to make improvements to the system, but the major impact to the system may
need to be made in the area of transit and alternative modes of transportation.
The alternatives presented in this document comprise all transportation modes in the City of Miami
Beach: the vehicular mode, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation and comply
with the established goals and objectives of the Transportation Element of the Update to the Miami
Beach Comprehensive Plan. Some of the specific elements include:
x Evaluate necessary safety improvements at locations with higher than average accident
rates.
x Identifying sidewalk and bicycle facilities improvements.
x Identify arterial and collector streets needed to accommodate future growth.
x Identify potential truck routes and improvements.
x Evaluation of improvements based upon future growth projections and bicycle and
pedestrian crash rates throughout the City of Miami Beach.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 2x Identifying potential public transportation options to mitigate deficiencies, including the
determination of opportunities for the City of Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, and the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to work together to address improvements.
5.2 Safety Analysis
A safety analysis was performed at higher than average accident rate locations throughout the City
of Miami Beach. For these high crash locations a crash analysis was performed including the crash
data for the last 3 years of available data at the Florida Department of Transportation (2005
through 2007). The data includes crash summaries by type of crash, crash rate as per the State of
Florida for similar intersection types, and also if any pedestrian or fatalities were included in the
crashes. Field observations were performed and a level of service analysis by approach and for the
total intersection are included in the crash summary forms. (Appendix A includes the Crash
Summary Forms).
In general, the following improvements are recommended at these locations:
x Evaluate access management for surrounding properties and/or adjacent facilities: several
locations were identified as a signalized intersection with an unsignalized facility located
100 feet or less to the intersection. Other cases include parking or driveways located in
close proximity to the intersection. In these cases, access management and permitted
interactions between different modes of transportation, presence of bike lanes, street
furniture, etc. shall be considered.
x Improve sidewalk infrastructure and sidewalk path at selected locations.
x Improve pavement markings and signage at selected locations.
5.3 Pedestrians and Bicycle Needs Assessment
The pedestrian and bicycle facility needs were identified based on the following factors:
x Sidewalk network deficiencies
x 2030 population growth
x Current household and employment densities
x Bicycle and pedestrian crashes
x Existing bicycle and pedestrian plans
5.3.1. Needs Identified Based on Existing Sidewalk Network
The City of Miami Beach boasts a large network of sidewalks throughout most of its arterial and
collector roads. However, there are sidewalk gaps in some areas. Table 1 identifies the needs
based on the sidewalk gaps along arterial and collector roads that would help to complete the
existing network of sidewalks. The sidewalk network is also deficient along single family home
neighborhoods. However, improvements along arterial and collector roads should be prioritized. In
addition, the following improvements are recommended based on an analysis of the existing
sidewalk network:
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 3x Some of the sidewalk gaps identified in Table 1 are along canals and waterways. These
facilities should be considered for development of multi-use paths that accommodate both
pedestrians and bicyclists.
x Sidewalk and other pedestrian facilities should be in compliance with the requirements
posed by the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Act.
x Signaling conforming to applicable standards should be provided at pedestrian crossings
and, push-button crosswalks should be installed at school intersections.
Table 1: Sidewalk Segment Gaps along Collector and Arterial Roads
Road From To Road Side(s) Miles
47 Street Royal Palm Avenue Prairie Road N 0.09
Abbott Avenue 72 Street 73 Street E 0.08
Alton Road Chase Avenue Michigan
Avenue
E 0.92
Byron Avenue 87 Terrace 88 Street E, W 0.04
Collins Avenue 79 Street 87 Street E 0.53
Collins Avenue 85 Street 87 Street W 0.12
Collins Avenue 39 Street 25 Street W 0.69
Dade Boulevard Venetian Causeway 25 Street S 2.15
Harding Avenue 86 Street 87 Street E 0.11
Pine Tree Drive 37 Street 28 Street W 0.41
Pine Tree Drive 63 Street 41 Street E 2.14
Prairie Avenue 47 Street 44 Street W 0.29
Prairie Avenue 34 Street 23 Street E 0.68
Source: Gannett Fleming, Inc (2008)
5.3.2. Needs Identified Based On Population Growth, Household and Employment Densities
The City of Miami Beach is one of densest cities in Miami Dade County. The City’s population is
projected to grow 17.73 % from 2005 through 2030. Figure 1 shows that the highest household
densities are located along the western and eastern shores of South Beach, and the eastern shores
of Middle Beach and North Beach. While the highest employment densities, as shown on Figure 2,
are located predominantly along the eastern shores of the entire City of Miami Beach. As discussed
in the subsequent sections, high-density residential and employment areas also have higher number
of bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Therefore, special consideration should be given to high density
residential and employment areas in prioritizing sidewalk and bicycle improvements. Improvements
in high density areas will ensure that the benefits of improvements are available to a larger
population. Specific improvements are identified in the subsequent sections.
5.3.3. Needs Based On Analysis of Bicycle Safety Conditions
Figures 3 and 4 show that the highest rate of bicycle crashes have occurred predominantly along
areas with the highest household and employment densities in the City of Miami Beach. The South
Beach section has a higher rate of bicycle crashes due to the local population’s affinity with cycling
and to higher traffic volumes than North Beach and Middle Beach.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 4Locations with high density of bicycle crashes are identified in Table 2. Identified improvements are
based on the 2006 Bicycle Safety Program Plan that located several high-density bicycle crash
locations across Miami-Dade County. In addition, the following improvements are recommended
to improve bicycling safety and public awareness about this mode of transportation:
x A quick response program should be implemented so that complaints about unsafe
bicycling conditions can be quickly responded to by the Public Works department or by
other regional departments that can evaluate and correct any physical safety hazards
identified.
x Traffic laws should be strictly enforced for all roadway users. There have been many crash
occurrences due to cyclists riding the roads in the wrong direction, or operating at night
without illumination. Many motor vehicle drivers are unaware of the 3 foot distance
requirement between the motor vehicle and bicycle which often results in accidental
collisions.
x The City should promote awareness about cycling safety through educational campaigns
and programs. An educational campaign could comprise of temporary pedestrian and bike
corridors on weekends. Awareness may be raised by the use billboards, vehicle wraps,
newscasts, roadside cyclist fatality signs, and other multi-media formats.
Table 2: Highest Bicycle Crash Locations and Potential Treatments
Location # Crashes Potential Treatments
Alton Road at 17 Street 11 Shared lane; education
Alton Road at 15 Street 9 Shared lane; education
Euclid Avenue at 5 Street 9 Enforcement
Meridian Avenue at 11 Street 8 Education; enforcement
Washington Avenue at 17 Street 8 Shared lane
Washington Avenue at Espanola Way 8 Signs, education
Washington Avenue at 16 Street 7 Shared lane
Alton Road at 11 Street 6 Shared lane; education
Dickens Avenue at 71 Street 6 Signs; education
Jefferson Avenue at 5 Street 6 Signs, education
Washington Avenue at 13 Street 6 Shared lane
Washington Avenue at 14 Street 6 Signs, education
Source: 2006 Bicycle Safety Program Plan (Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization)
5.3.4. Needs Based on Analysis of Pedestrian Safety Conditions
Figure 5 shows that the highest rates of pedestrian crashes have occurred within high density
household and employment areas as well. These areas experience high traffic counts, which
increase the likelihood of pedestrian crashes. South Beach in particular has the highest number of
pedestrian crash occurrences due to the high population density in the area as a result of numerous
entertainment and tourist venues. It is recommended that pedestrian improvements (i.e. sidewalks,
pedestrian crossings, signs) be prioritized along high pedestrian crash areas, followed by high
density employment and household areas. Sidewalk widening is recommended along high density
residential and employment areas that experience high foot traffic. Table 3 shows a list of high
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 5pedestrian crash corridors within the City. Site-specific pedestrian improvements are recommended
along those corridors.
Table 3: High Pedestrian Crash Corridors
Corridor From To
Collins Avenue 5 Street 22 Street
Washington Avenue 5 Street Dade Boulevard
Alton Road 5 Street Dade Boulevard
Ocean Drive 5 Street 14 Street
Collins Avenue 65 Street 79 Street
71 Street Collins Avenue Bay Drive
Harding Avenue 73 Street Indian Creek Drive
Normandy Drive Bay Drive Bay Drive
41 Street Alton Road Collins Avenue
Dade Boulevard Purdy Avenue Collins Avenue
17 Street Collins Avenue West Avenue
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (2005)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 6Figure 1. Household Density
Source: Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 7Figure 2: Employment Density
Source: Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 8Figure 3: Bicycle Crash Densities (2000-2004)
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 9Figure 4: Pedestrian Crash Densities (2000-2004)
Figure 5: Bus Service Gaps
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 105.3.5. Needs Identified Based On Existing Bicycle Network
Miami Beach’s Bicycle Network currently consists of disconnected segments spread across the City.
An evaluation of existing plans will be used to identify the needs within the City. The 1998 Miami
Beach Municipal Mobility Plan addressed mobility needs including bicycles. The City recently
adopted the 2006 Atlantic Greenway Network (AGN) Plan which identified specific bicycle
improvements projects throughout the City.
Bicycle facility needs listed in Tables 4 and 5 are based on the recommendations of the AGN plan.
The identified projects will help improve cycling conditions and connectivity throughout the City. In
addition, the following policy recommendations should be further evaluated:
x A Complete Streets policy should be adopted that ensures that transportation officials
routinely design and operate the right of way to grant safe access for all users including
cyclists, pedestrians, transit users, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities.
x Programs should be created that encourage cycling to the workplace. For example,
incentives should be created that reward commuters that choose to walk or use their bicycle
to reach their destination, or to employers that encourage this activity.
Table 4: Needs Projects - Bicycle Facilities
Source: The 2006 Atlantic Greenway Network Plan
Facility Type Road From To Beach Area
Bike Path Beach Path South Beach North Beach
South Beach,
Middle Beach,
North Beach
Bike Path Dade Boulevard Venetian
Causeway 25 Street South Beach
Bike Lane 5 Street TBD TBD South Beach
Bike Lane Pine Tree Drive TBD TBD Middle Beach
Bike Lane Normandy Drive TBD TBD North Beach
Bike Lane West Avenue TBD TBD South Beach
Bike Lane Euclid Avenue TBD TBD South Beach
Bike Lane Meridian Avenue Dade Boulevard TBD Middle Beach
Bike Lane Prairie Avenue TBD TBD Middle Beach
Bike Lane 16 Street TBD TBD South Beach
Bike Route Michigan
Avenue Alton Road Dade Boulevard South Beach
Bike Route West Avenue Venetian
Causeway Lincoln Road South Beach
Bike Route Meridian Avenue Dade Boulevard Lincoln Road South Beach
Bike Route 11 Street West Avenue Collins Avenue South Beach
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 11Table 5: Needs Projects - Bicycle Facility Connectors
Facility Type Road From To Beach Area
Bike Boulevard Carlyle Road 71 Street Tatum Park North Beach
Bike Lane 79 Street Carlyle Road Collins Avenue North Beach
Bike Path 79 Street Collins Avenue Beach Park North Beach
Bike Lane 69 Street Indian Creek Collins Avenue North Beach
Bike Path 69 Street Collins Road Beach North Beach
Bike Lane Abbott Avenue 69 Street 73 Street North Beach
Bike Path Indian Creek East
Shore 71 Street 69 Street North Beach
Bike Lane 73 Street Abbott Avenue Collins Avenue North Beach
Bike Path 73 Street Collins Avenue Beach North Beach
Bike Path Alton Road – west side N Bay Road 51 Street Middle Beach
Bike Path Alton Road – east side Lakeview Road 51 Street Middle Beach
Bike Route 51 Street Alton Road West end of 51
Street Middle Beach
Bike Route Alton Road N Bay Road Mount Sinai H.
Road Middle Beach
Bike Lane Alton Road Mount Sinai H.
Road Godfrey Road Middle Beach
Bike Route Alton Road Godfrey Road W 39 Street Middle Beach
Bike Route W 39 Street Alton Road Meridian Avenue Middle Beach
Bike Route Garden Avenue W 39 Street W 34 Street Middle Beach
Bike Route Alton Road (north
bound) W 34 Street Chase Avenue Middle Beach
Bike Path Alton Road N Bay Road Julia Tuttle
Causeway Middle Beach
Bike Path Chase Avenue Alton Road Eastern extent of
Chase Avenue Middle Beach
Bike Path Alton Road Michigan
Avenue Chase Road Middle Beach
Bike Path Michigan Avenue Dade
Boulevard Alton Road South Beach
Bike Lane West Avenue Lincoln Road 17 Street South Beach
Bike Path 17 Street West Avenue Dade Boulevard South Beach
Bike Lane 6 Street West Avenue Michigan Avenue South Beach
Bike Lanes Michigan Avenue 6 Street 5 Street South Beach
Bike Route 5 Street Collins Avenue Ocean Drive South Beach
Bike Path 73 Street Collins Avenue Beach South Beach
Bike Lane Normandy Drive Bonita Court City Limit North Beach
Bike Lane 71 Street Bonita Court City Limit North Beach
Bike Route North Shore Drive Normandy
Drive Fairway Park Middle Beach
Bike Route Biarritz Drive Normandy
Drive South Shore Drive North Beach
Bike Lane Indian Creek Drive 71 Street 63 Street North Beach
Bike Route 63 Street LaGorce Drive Collins Avenue North Beach
Bike Lane Pine Tree Drive 63 Street 47 Street North Beach
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 12Source: The 2006 Atlantic Greenway Network Plan
5.4 Transit Facilities Need Assessment
This section includes the methodology used to assess the level of service provided by the transit
services existing in the City of Miami Beach. The following factors were considered in evaluating the
needs of the City’s transit system:
x Bus Route Network Deficiencies
x Bus Ridership Growth
x Current household and employment densities
x Existing Transit Plans
5.4.1. Needs Identified Based on Existing Transit Network
To maintain the mobility of a multimodal transportation system, it is vital that the City of Miami
Beach has a well connected transit system operating throughout the existing roadway system. The
existing transit system consists of fixed-route buses, Para-transit service, disadvantaged service, and
demand response service. Currently, there are over 15 bus routes operating in the City. Figure 6
show that most of the City is within ¼ mile radius of a bus route. It is recommended that bus
services be provided either by rerouting the existing routes or by introducing new routes to locations
that are not within ¼ mile of a bus route.
5.4.2. Needs Identified Based on Bus Ridership Growth
Bus transit ridership has increased throughout most of the bus routes operating within the City of
Miami Beach. Table 6 shows the average weekday boarding yearly ridership comparison from
August 2000 thru August 2008. On average, ridership increased 20% from 2000 through 2008.
Based upon this ridership data, the following recommendations are made:
Facility Type Road From To Beach Area
Bike Lane LaGorce Drive 63 Street 51 Street North Beach
Bike Path Indian Creek East
Shore 55 Street 24 Street Middle Beach
Bike Path Beach View Park Indian Creek Beach North Beach
Bike Path Indian Beach Park Indian Creek Beach North Beach
Bike Path Indian Beach Park Indian Creek Pine Tree Park North Beach
Bike Lane 44 Street Pine Tree Park Prairie Avenue Middle Beach
Bike Lane Prairie Avenue 44 Street Arthur Godfrey
Road Middle Beach
Bike Lane Arthur Godfrey Road Alton Road Indian Creek
Bridge South Beach
Bike Lane Pine Tree Drive 34 Street Dade Boulevard Middle Beach
Bike Lane Alton Road Dade
Boulevard Michigan Avenue South Beach
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 13x Increase service frequency along high ridership routes such as 112 L, 119 S, and 123
South Beach Local
x Consider running a skip-stop service along routes with high ridership such as 112 L, 119 S,
and 123 South Beach Local
Table 6: Bus Ridership Data - 8 Year Comparison
Bus Route August 2000
Ridership
August 2008
Ridership
% increase
51 Flagler Max 1,692 4,304 154.37%
62 4,631 4,320 -6.72%
101 A 353 643 82.15%
103 B 1,454 1,812 24.62%
107 G 3,118 3,155 1.19%
108 H 4,601 4,653 1.13%
110 J 4,709 5,363 13.89%
111 K 4,560 3,897 -14.54%
112 L 10,901 10,509 -3.6%
113 M 1,814 1,640 -9.59%
118 R 359 370 3.06%
119 S 14,315 12,858 -10.18%
120 Beach Max no data 7,631
123 South Beach Local no data 6,885
246 Night Owl no data 352
Source: Miami-Dade Transit
5.4.3. Needs Identified Based Upon Review of Existing Transit Plans
A review of existing transit plans helped to identify the transit service needs of the City.
Express Transit Service across Biscayne Bay
The 2002 Bay Link Plan addressed the transit mobility needs of commuters traveling from Miami
Beach across Biscayne Bay towards the City of Miami. The Plan consists of a 19-mile streetcar
system that would travel via the MacArthur Causeway and connect with 43 stations along its three
distinct routes.
The 2002 Bay Link Plan identified a need to connect Miami Beach with the City of Miami’s
downtown. However, the planned Bay Link streetcar system is not funded. Therefore, an express bus
service from the proposed South Beach Intermodal Transit Facility to the Government Center
Intermodal Station in Downtown Miami is recommended.
Improved Transit Connections
The public transit service improvement needs identified in Table 7 are based on the 2007 Coast
Communities Transit Master Plan. The plan included an analysis of future needs and identification
of locations for major transit transfer hubs. The goal of the study was to analyze existing transit
service in the coastal community area and streamline existing service to improve operational
efficiency and reduce transit impact on other traffic. It also identified locations for major transit
hubs.
Based upon the transit connection needs presented, it is recommended that the City coordinate with
Miami-Dade County Transit to prioritize transit improvements along high ridership corridors
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 14identified in Table 6. In addition to public transit service improvements, the following transit facility
improvements needs are also identified:
x Bus pull-outs should be constructed and installed where right-of-way permits.
x Adequate lighting should be provided around all bus-stops for safety.
x ADA accessible Bus shelters, benches, and trash receptacles should be installed along high
frequency bus stops.
The Coastal Communities Transit Master Plan considers implementation in 3 phases: short
(immediate implementation to 5 years), mid (5 to 10 years), and long term (10 years +).
The short term mainly focuses on implementing non-capital projects, using existing resources. The
mid term improvements focus on transfer stations, station development and initial capital
improvements. This is an opportunity for the City to coordinate with the Florida Department of
Transportation (PTO Office) to implement. Long term improvements refer to bus rapid transit where
right of way is required, park and ride stations and others.
Table 7 – Transit Needs
Bus Route Implementation
Priority/Phase
Recommendations
101 A I Extend service to the proposed South Beach Bus
Transfer Station at 23 Street. Provide service to
important destinations across the bay within the City of
Miami.
107 G II Truncate service at the proposed North Beach bus
transfer station. Service change must happen
concurrently with the enhanced frequency service on
Route S and Route T and the implementation of the
proposed North Beach bus station.
108 H II Truncate service at the proposed North Beach bus
transfer station, which must happen concurrently with
the frequency improvements on Routes S and T, and the
implementation of the North Beach Bus Transfer
Station.
110 J I Truncate service at Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Coordinate service with proposed Middle Beach
Intercept park and ride lot.
111 K I Replace the route with enhanced connection between
Route T and Route S. Coordinate service with proposed
North Beach Local and Middle Beach Local services.
112 L II Truncate service at the proposed South Beach bus
transfer station, which must happen concurrently with
the extension of the South Beach local service.
118 R I Replace the route with proposed North Beach Local and
Middle Beach local services.
119 S II Increase service frequency. Reduce headway by 5
minutes on Sunday, by 3 minutes on Saturday, and by 2
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 15minutes on weekdays.
123 South Beach
Local
I Coordinate service with proposed South Beach Bus
Transfer Station.
New Bus Routes
Proposed
Phase/Priority New Route Summary
North Beach
Circulator
I The City of Miami Beach is working on finalizing the
North Beach Circulator project, which may be
implemented by mid to late 2009.
Middle Beach
Circulator
I The project proposes a circulator service to link the
neighborhoods comprising the Middle Beach area of
Miami Beach. As a consequence, existing MDT bus
routes would be altered to accommodate the new
service.
New Bus Transfer
Station
Phase/Priority Transfer Station Summary
South Beach Bus
Transfer Station
I Implement temporary street bus transfer facility in phase
I at 23 Street between Collins and Park Avenue. Phase II
calls for identifying a better location that can
accommodate up to 7 buses and can load and unload
passengers safely and easily.
North Beach
Transfer Station
I Implement transfer facility at existing stops between 71
Street and 73 Street on Collins Avenue and Abbott
Avenue. Phase II will construct a bus transfer facility on
City-owned property between 72 Street and 73 Street,
Collins Avenue and Abbott Avenue.
Middle
Beach/Mount Sinai
Medical Center
Interceptor Park and
Ride Station
III The park and ride station would be located at the
Mount Sinai Medical Center site. Phase I calls for a
feasibility study prior to design and construction.
South Beach
Interceptor Park and
Ride Stations
III Two facilities are proposed in the South Beach area.
The first would be located near Alton Road and
MacArthur Causeway, and the second would require
further study to locate an additional facility within the
South Beach Corridor.
Source: Gannett Fleming, 2008
5.5 Roadway Needs Assessment
The next step after identifying the deficient roadways in the E+C network and identify the
additional collector and arterial streets needed to accommodate future growth.
The future roadway system will consist of existing roadways with some planned capital
improvements, including operational, transit, TSM and additional capacity, where necessary.
The existing plans were used as a basis to identify planned projects throughout the roadway
network and are included in Table 8.
Appendix B presents the backup documentation from the previous studies and LRTP from the
County, including priorities for the different projects, and transit information.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 16These preliminary recommendations will be further evaluated along with the Project
Management Team from the City of Miami Beach.
5.6 Evaluation of Proposed Improvements
Since the transportation needs plan are greater than what is available for the identified
improvements, all the projects are evaluated against a set of criteria. It is necessary to prioritize
the improvements included in the needs plan to ensure all projects which best meets the criteria
and address the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan would be included as coast
feasible in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
The proposed alternatives are proposed to be evaluated using the following criteria:
1. Proposed Traffic Volumes
2. Level of Service
3. Approximate Construction and Right of Way Costs
4. Impacts to Adjacent Land Uses
5. Environmental Impacts
6. Economic Impacts
7. Social Impacts
8. Energy Impacts
9. Connectivity
10. Promote Multi-modal Choices
These criteria serve to evaluate all proposed alternatives and prioritize the resulting CIP into
short, mid and long term projects. Please see Table 9 for the Evaluation Criteria Matrix.
5.7 Conclusion
This technical memorandum has identified the needed improvements to maintain the adopted
level of service for the deficient facilities by mode of transportation.
As seen in the previous sections, multimodal projects that promote alternative transportation
modes are being recommended throughout the transportation network.
The set of transportation improvements have stemmed from the previous plans and studies
undertaken by the City of Miami Beach and that are now being studied comprehensively to
ensure that the City’s network will further the goals, objectives and policies included in the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and that the City will continue to provide opportunities that promote a
dense, compact and mixed use community.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 17Figure 5: Bus Service Gaps
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 18Table 8: Proposed Improvements to the Roadway Network
Roadway Link Yr 2008 Yr 2015 Yr 2030
1. Alton Rd (15 St - Dade Blvd)X X X Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street parking lanes, 14 ft
shared-use sidewalks with landscaping.
Intersection improvements including signal phasing/timing and exclusive left-turn lanes.
2. 63 St (Alton Rd - Indian Creek Dr)X X X Synchronize traffic signals + signal phasing/timing improvements without impacting pedestrian safety.
Requires further detailed analyses.
3. Alton Rd ( Dade Blvd - 41 St)X X X Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street parking lanes, 14 ft
shared-use sidewalks with landscaping. (Dade Blvd - Michigan Ave)
Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks. (Michigan Ave - 41 St)
4. La Gorce Dr (51 St - 63 St)X X X Further studies to determine increased levels of traffic calming such as wider center islands, chokers, speed tables, etc.
5. Pine Tree Dr (51 St - 63 St)X X X Improve channelization at 51 St.
6. 15 St (West Ave - Meridian Ave)X X Convert 15 St and 16 St as one way pairs from Alton Rd to Washington Ave. LOS on 15 St will improve from F to D.
Will require further detailed traffic operations and capacity/LOS analyses.
7. Collins Ave (5 St - 11 St)X X Synchronize traffic signals + signal phasing/timing improvements and provide for pedestrian safety
through better markings, signages and wider sidewalks as feasible. Requires further detailed analyses.
8. West Ave (5 St - 15 St)X X Refer to recent study by the City.
9. West Ave (15 St - Dade Blvd)XX
10. Alton Rd ( 41 St - 63 St)X X Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks.
11. Arthur Godfrey Rd (Alton Rd - Indian
Crk Dr)X X Synchronize traffic signals + signal phasing/timing improvements and provide for pedestrian safety
through better markings, signages and wider sidewalks as feasible. Requires further detailed analyses.
12. 11 St (Meridian Ave - Ocean Dr)X Monitor traffic conditions to determine feasibilty of converting 11 St and 10 Street into one way pairs from Alton Rd
to Washington Ave in the future.
13. Alton Rd (5 St - 11 St)X Bus transit headways improvement & roadway improvements.
Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street parking lanes, 14 ft
shared-use sidewalks with landscaping.
Intersection improvements including signal phasing/timing and exclusive left-turn lanes.
TSM recommendations for 5th Street Flyover to include signage & marking improvements, replacing barrier walls and
railings, increase clear width to 17 Ft and at-grade bus-only EB left-turn bay on 5th St and Alton Rd.
14. MacArthur Cswy (Fountain St - Alton
Rd)X Monitor future traffic conditions to determine feasibility of signal phasing and timing improvements without sacrificing
pedestrian safety.
15. Meridian Ave (17 St - Dade Blvd)X Monitor future traffic conditions to determine feasibility of signal phasing and timing improvements without sacrificing
pedestrian safety.
16. Prairie Ave (Dade Blvd - 44 St)X Traffic calming measures such as center islands, chockers, speed tables, traffic circles south of 40 St.
Will require further detailed study.
17. Collins Ave (71 St - 87 Terr)X Concentrate on bus transit improvements such as reducing headways.
18. Indian Creek Dr (63 St - 71 St)X Concentrate on bus transit improvements such as reducing headways.
Peak-Hr Peak Direction
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element - - Proposed Improvements
Proposed Improvement(s)
Operating at LOS E or F
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 19Table 9 – Evaluation Criteria Matrix
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element - Evaluation of Proposed Transportation Improvements
Daily LOS Adjacent
Project Project Traffic Without Land Total
Number Description Veh per Day Project Construction R/W Uses Economic Social Energy Connectivity Score Priority
1
Alton Rd (15 St - Dade Blvd)
Reconstruction, traffic operations,
ped safety, landscaping, etc.55155551133M
2
63rd Street (Alton Rd - Indian Crk Dr)
Synchronize traffic signals,
phase/timing improv & ped safety.55555551137MH
3
Alton Rd (Dade Blvd - 41 St)
Reconstruction, traffic operations,
ped safety, landscaping, etc.55155551133M
4
La Gorce Dr (51 St-63 St) Improve
existing traffic calming devices and
channelization at 51 St.15355551131M
5
Pine Tree Dr (51 St-63 St) Improve
existing traffic calming devices and
channelization at 51 St.35355551133M
6
15th Street (West Ave - Meridian
Ave) Convert 15 & 16 St into one way
pair (Alton - Washington)33355351129M
7
Collins Ave (5 St - 11 St)
Synchronize traffic signals,
phase/timing improv & ped safety.33555551133M
8
West Ave (5 St - 15 St) Traffic
operations and ped safety
improvements.33355551333M
9
West Ave (15 St - Dade Blvd) Traffic
operations and ped safety
improvements.33355551333M
10
Alton Rd (41 St - 63 St) Provide for
wider shared-use sidewalks 51535553133M
11
Arthur Godfrey Rd (Alton Rd - Indian
Crk Dr) Synchronize traffic signals,
phase/timing improv & ped safety.53555551135MH
12
11th Street (Meridian Ave - Ocean
Dr) Convert 10 & 11 St into one way
pair (Alton - Washington)13355351127LM
13
Alton Rd (5 St - 15 St)
Reconstruction, traffic operations,
ped safety, landscaping, TSM, etc.53155551131M
Impacts to
Costs
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 20Daily LOS Adjacent
Project Project Traffic Without Land Total
Number Description Veh per Day Project Construction R/W Uses Economic Social Energy Connectivity Score Priority
14
MacArthur Cswy (Fountain St - Alton
Rd) Traffic signal phase/timing
improvements and pedestrian safety.53555551135MH
15
Meridian Ave (17 St - Dade Blvd)
Traffic signal phase/timing
improvements & pedestrian safety.33555551133MH
16
Prairie Ave (Dade Blvd - 44 St)
Traffic calming measures.13355551129MH
17
Collins Ave (71 St - 87 Terr) Transit
improvements 53555553339MH
18
Indian Creek Dr (63 St - 71 St)
Transit improvements 53555553339MH
20
Bus Route G / 107 - Reduce
headways to 20 minutes.53555553339MH
21
Bus Route M / 113 - Reduce
headways to 20 minutes.53555553339MH
22
Bus Route 62 - Expand coverage to
Lincoln Rd area.53555553339MH
23
Bus Route 120 / Max - Reduce
headways to 20 minutes or less.53555553339MH
24
Proposed North Beach Transit
Circulator 53555553339MH
25
Atlantic Green Way Network (AGN)
proposed bicycle/pedestrian plan.53355553135MH
26
Detailed evaluation of existing
bicycle/ped facilities and identify
improvements and new projects. 53355553135MH
27
City wide TDM inititives for
Carpooling, Van Pooling &
Ridesharing.55555555545H
28
City wide TDM initiatives for Alternate
Work Schedules, Compressed Work
Week, Flextime, Telecommuting,
Staggered Work Hours, etc.55555555545H
29
City wide TDM initiatives to allow for
transportation allowances, financial
incentives, transit fare insentives,
pricing measures,etc.55555555545H
Impacts to
Costs
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 21Numerical
Description Value
Daily Traffic Volumes (Vpd)
Low 1
Medium 3 10,001 to 20,000 vpd
High 5 > 20,000 vpd
Existing or Forecasted LOS Without
Improvements Yr 2008 Peak-hour Peak-direction (roadway)
Low 1 A to C
Medium 3 D to E
High 5 F
Construction Costs
Low 5 Up to $250.000
Medium 3 $250,001 to $750,000
High 1 > $750,000
Right-of-Way Acquisition
None 5 No R/W acquisition required.
Small to Moderate 3 R/W acquisition required for Intersection corner radii, small portion of adjacent land less than one City block in length.
Extensive 1 R/W acquisition required along a roadway segment longer than a City block in length.
Impact to Adjacent Land Uses
Low 5 Little or no impact to neighborhood quality of life, recreational facilities, and schools.
Moderate 3 Increase in traffic volumes will not exceed neighborhood livability thresholds, and will not require significant changes to
provide access to schools and recreational facilities.
High 1 Increase in traffic volumes will exceed neighborhood livability thresholds, and will require significant changes to provide
access to schools and recreational facilities.
Economic Impact
Low 5 No displacement of existing businesses.
Moderate 3 Displacement of businesses or access to limited to an intersection or less than a City block.
High 1 Displacement of businesses or access to at more than one intersection and more than a City block.
Social Impact
Low 5 No residential displacement.
Moderate 3 Residential displacement limited to an intersection or less than a City block.
High 1 Residential displacement at more than one intersection and more than a City block.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
1 to 10,000 vpd
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOPage 22Numerical
Description Value
Connectivity
Low 1 No new roadway or transit connections
Moderate 3 Provides new connections to collectors roadways or increase in transit coverage to a small or limited area within the City.
High 5 Provides new connections to arterial roadways or increase in transit coverage to larger areas within and beyond the City.
Energy Impact
Low 1 No increase in fuel savings. Will not result in modal shift from the single occupancy vehicle.
Moderate 3 Moderate fuel savings resulting from modal shifts limited to a specific single project or small area within the City.
High 5 Significant shifts from single occupancy vehicle resulting from major or City wide multimodal improvement projects.
Scoring Range Priority
9 to 21 Low L
22 to 27 Low-Medium LM
28 to 33 Medium M
34 to 39 Medium-High MH
40 to 45 High H
EVALUATION CRITERIA
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOAppendix A - Crash Summary Forms
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOAppendix B - Previous Studies
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
CORRADINOCity of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Table of Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1
Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 1
Regional Context ...................................................................................................................... 1
Data, Inventory and Analysis ................................................................................................... 3
Existing Transportation System and Transportation Need Analysis ........................................ 3
Existing Transportation Facilities ............................................................................................. 4
Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ............................................................................... 16
Existing Public Transit Facilities ............................................................................................. 20
Transportation Disadvantaged Program ............................................................................... 22
Roadway Analysis ................................................................................................................... 32
Future Transportation System (2030) and Future Transportation Needs Analysis ............... 40
Future Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan ....................................................................................... 43
Future Roadway Condition Analysis ....................................................................................... 56
Planned Projects (Existing Plus Committed Network) ........................................................... 57
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
As per Rule 9J-5.019, of the Florida Administrative Code, every local government which has all
or part of its jurisdiction included within the urbanized area of the Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO), must prepare and adopt a transportation element consistent with the
provisions of this rule and Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. The City of Miami Beach
Transportation Element also includes all updates required as part of Senate Bill 360.
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for an efficient, safe, and coordinated
multimodal transportation system within the City of Miami Beach. This Element is developed in
coordination with the Miami-Dade County Transportation Element, the Miami-Dade County
MPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), and the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT). The Transportation Element consists of two main sections as follows: a) Data, Inventory
and Analysis Report, and b) the Goals, Objectives, and Policies, which set the overall guidelines
for transportation planning within the City.
REGIONAL CONTEXT
Socioeconomic, Political and Cultural Factors
The City of Miami Beach was created March 26th, 1915 and is one of the eight Coastal
Communities with more than 85,000 residents. It is bounded by the City of Surfside to the north,
the City of Miami to the west, Fisher Island is to the south, and the Atlantic Ocean is to the east.
The City consists of residential neighborhoods as follows:
1. Biscayne Point
2. Normandy Shores
3. North Shore
4. Normandy Isles
5. La Gorce
6. Oceanfront
7. Nautilus
8. Bayshore
9. City Center
10. Venetian Islands
11. West Avenue
12. Star, Palm and Hibiscus Island (does Fisher Island enter this group?)
13. South Pointe
14. Flamingo/Lummus Page 1
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFrom a Commercial perspective these are the City’s areas/groups:
1. Bandshell District
2. Town Center
3. Normandy Circle
4. 41st Street
5. City Center Redevelopment Area (same area as Neighborhood 9)
6. South Pointe Redevelopment Area (same area as Neighborhood 13)
7. Collins Park Hotel District
8. Lincoln Road
9. Alton West
10. Collins Avenue Shopping District
11. Entertainment District
There are also associations within the City that represent residential and commercial interest
groups such as the Washington Avenue Neighborhood Association (WANA). The boundaries are
along Washington Avenue from “Government Center to Dade Boulevard, and on 4th through
17th Street from Collins Court west to Washington Avenue and from Drexel Avenue or
Pennsylvania Avenue, as the case may be, east to Washington Avenue.”
The per-capita median income was approximately $38,594 in 2007 within the City of Miami
Beach. The population’s race is predominately Latino (53.5%), followed by White (40.9%), Black
(4%), and others (1.6%). The percentage of owner-occupied residential units in the City is almost
43.6%.
Modal Split is the proportion of total person trips that use each of various specified modes of
transportation. The projected modal split, taken directly from Miami-Dade County data, is 93%
to 7% in favor of cars.
Growth and Development Activity
The City of Miami Beach is promoting infill and redevelopment projects to support livability and
transit friendly developments. The areas along Alton Road, Collins Avenue, and Lincoln Road
corridor are the core commercial area in the City. Recent growth has been present in the South
Pointe and northern areas of the City with mainly redevelopment and mixed use development.
Based on this information, basic considerations for the Transportation Element are as follows:
x Due to the per capita income, age composition and home ownership, it seems to suggest
that there may be opportunities for multimodal choices within the City.
x The northern and southern areas of the City represent an opportunity to create a transit
oriented corridor for the entire City along the north-south corridors (Collins and Alton
Road).Page 2
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOx It is suggested that the city continue implementing multimodal improvements within the
three main planning areas (North Beach, Middle Beach, and South Beach) as well as
interconnecting them.
DATA, INVENTORY, AND ANALYSIS
This data, inventory, and analysis section provides a comprehensive approach of the City of
Beach’s existing and future needs. For the future analysis, the planning horizon Year 2030 has
been used consistent with Miami-Dade County’s Long Range Transportation Plan and
Comprehensive plan. We have also used an interim analysis year of 2015. The Data, Inventory
and Analysis section includes the following:
x An analysis of the existing conditions, existing roadway system, existing and remaining
capacities, existing land use, existing challenges facing the roadway system, existing
transit facilities;
x Growth trends and travel patterns, including the relationships between land use and
transportation systems;
x An analysis of the capital improvements planned by the City of Miami-Beach, Miami-
Dade County and the Florida Department of Transportation;
x Projected transportation system level of service;
x An assessment of future needs and funding resources;
The Data, Inventory and Analysis includes two main subsections:
x Existing Transportation System and Transportation Needs Analysis
x System (2030) and (2015) and Future Transportation Needs Analysis
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ANALYSIS
For the Transportation Element, Rule 9J-5.019 requires an analysis of the existing transportation
facilities and an evaluation of the existing system needs based on the existing conditions analysis,
existing land use and the committed developments in the area. For this purpose, all the
transportation facilities were analyzed based on the collected data and information provided by
Miami-Dade County and Miami-Dade County MPO. This Element is consistent with the Future
Land Use Element, MPO Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and Miami-Dade County’s
Comprehensive Plan.
Currently the roadways that compromise the Miami Beach Transportation System consist of State
Highways (SR 907, SR A1A, SR I-195, SR 836 and SR 934) county roads and local roads. The
only facility within those city limits is part of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) or Florida
Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) is SR I-195.Page 3
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOEXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES:
The existing transportation system in the City consists of the existing roadway system, pedestrian
network, sidewalks, and transit system.
Airports
The City of Miami Beach does not have its own airport within City limits. Miami-Dade County has
an international airport, known as the Miami International Airport which is located approximately
9 miles from the City of Miami Beach. Map 1 shows all of the airports within 10 miles of the City.
MIA is ranked third busiest airport in the U.S. in terms of total international passengers and ranks
15th in the U.S. in terms of total passengers. MIA continues to be the number one airport in the
nation for international freight (2007), and number three in the U.S. for total freight. Several
roadway facilities lead from the City to the airport, including, I-195 and I-395. There are few
transit services connecting the City with the Airport.
Waterports
The Port of Miami, located within two miles of the City, is one of the nation’s busiest ports and
serves commercial passengers and freight transport needs (Map 2). During fiscal year 2007,
3.75 million passengers passed through the Port, and over 7.84 million tons and 879,398 TEUs
(twenty-foot equivalent units) of cargo transited through the seaport. The Port of Miami serves
more than 20 shipping lines that serve 250 ports globally. The Port of Miami is accessible from
Miami Beach through I-395, about 2 miles away. There are few transit services connecting the
City with the passenger port.
Rail
Map 3 shows the rail network that provides freight and passenger service in Miami-Dade County.
This network does not extend into the City of Miami Beach.Page 4
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 1: Existing Airport Facilities
Source: Miami-Dade County (2008) Page 5
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 2: Existing Waterport Facilities
Source: Miami-Dade County (2008) Page 6
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 3: Existing Rail Network
Source: Miami-Dade County (2008) Page 7
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOExisting Roadways
Functional Classification
The existing transportation system in the City consists of the existing roadway system, the
pedestrian network, bicycle lanes and transit system.
Rule 9J-5.0019 requires an analysis of the existing transportation facilities and an evaluation of
the existing system needs based on the existing conditions analysis, existing land uses and
committed developments in the area. For these purposes, all the transportation facilities were
analyzed based on collected data and information provided by the Miami-Dade MPO. This
section contains the existing conditions analysis and data collected. The following section
contains the level of service analysis.
Existing Roadway System
This section includes available information on the existing roadway network. This information
identifies the following information for the transportation system:
x Jurisdiction;
x Functional classification;
x Right-of-way widths;
x Number of travel lanes;
x Posted speed limits;
x On-street parking;
x Pavement conditions;
Existing Functional Classification
Functional classification is a method of classifying roads by the service they provide as part of the
overall highway system. Most travel involves movement through a network of roads. Functional
classification defines the nature of traveling within a network in a logical and efficient manner by
defining the role that any particular road or street should play in serving the flow of trips through
the entire highway network.
Roadways are formally classified by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) through a
statewide, cooperative process with county and local jurisdictions. This ongoing process, known
as Functional Classification, is used primarily to assign governmental responsibility for
maintenance and roadway improvement funding. In recent times, a host of additional FDOT
policy definitions have also been linked to the State’s functional classification system.
According to the FDOT functional classification system, roadways within urban areas are ranked
in hierarchical order as follows: State Principal Arterial, State Minor Arterial, County Minor Page 8
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOArterials, County Urban Collectors and City (or local unincorporated area) Urban Collectors.
While FDOT has a very slightly different nomenclature for non-urban areas, this does not apply
to the City of Miami Beach.
The aarterial system in general, provides the highest level of mobility at the highest speed for
mostly longer trips and travel. Arterial roadways can be broadly defined as those facilities which
carry relatively heavy volumes of traffic for activities such as shopping, employment and the
movement of goods and services. Arterial roadways provide for regional movement; for travel to
destinations outside the City; or for non-locally-oriented traffic to travel through Miami Beach to
other destinations within the region. The Interstate Highway System is an arterial network.
Arterials generally have higher design standards than other roads, often with multiple lanes and
higher degree of access control.
The uurban arterial system is divided into principal and minor arterials. The urban principal arterial
system is the most important group. It includes Interstate highways, other freeways and
expressways, and other principal arterials. The urban principal arterial system serves the major
centers of activity of a metropolitan area, has the highest traffic volume corridors and the longest
trip desires; and should carry a high portion of the total urban area travel on a minimum of
mileage. It carries most trips entering and leaving urban areas, and it provides continuity for all
rural arterials that intercept urban boundaries.
The uurban minor arterial system provides service for trips of moderate length and at a lower level
of mobility. They connect with urban principal arterial roads and rural collector routes. Examples
in Miami Beach would include 63rd Street, Alton Road, and Dade Blvd.
Collectors,in general, provide a lower degree of mobility than arterials. Collector facilities serve
an intermediate function to collect/distribute traffic between regional arterial facilities and local
roadways. They are designed for travel at lower speeds and for shorter distances. Collectors are
typically two-lane roads that collect and distribute traffic from the arterial system. Collectors in
Miami Beach are streets such as Pine Tree, Washington, Meridian, West Ave, and 17th Street.
The uurban collector system provides traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods and
commercial and industrial areas. Unlike arterials, collector roads may penetrate residential
communities, distributing traffic from the arterials to the ultimate destination for many motorists.
Urban collectors also channel traffic from local streets onto the arterial system.
Local roads represent the largest element in the road network in terms of mileage. Local streets
serve as site-specific terminal routes for each end of a trip. For rural and urban areas, all public
road mileage below the collector system is considered local. Local roads provide basic access
between residential and commercial properties, connecting with higher order highways. A route
meeting this purpose would connect a home, work, or entertainment trip by connecting the final
destination to the roads serving longer trips. Examples of roads meeting the purposes described
in this paragraph include those located within a residential subdivision or a cluster of commercial
buildings. Examples of Local roads in Miami Beach are 29th Street, 7th Street, Cleveland,
Daytonia, 51st Street and Bay Drive. Page 9
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOA review was conducted to determine the functional classification of the roads, number of
through-lanes, service volumes and corresponding directional, bi-directional and daily traffic
volumes level of service.
Additionally, and due to the different planning areas included within the City of Miami Beach, the
functional classification system was tailored to the specific needs of the City. The different
residential and commercial areas were considered when classifying the transportation network.
This is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1 – Urban Roadway Definitions
Source: AASHTO, 2001
Maps 5 and 6 depict existing directional number of lanes for arterials and collectors within the City of
Miami Beach. This information is also shown in the Level of Service tables. Page 10
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 4 Existing Roadway System
Source: City of Miami Beach (2008) Page 11
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 5 Existing Lane Configuration Page 12
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 6 Existing Functional Classification
Source: Florida Department of Transportation (2007) Page 13
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOExisting Parking Facilities
A majority of parking facilities are located within close proximity to major trip generators, such as
public parks, theaters and shopping districts. The City of Miami Beach is very urbanized and there
are multiple transit generators and attractors within the City, such as Lincoln Road Pedestrian
Mall, South Beach shopping districts and beachfront parks. Table 1 details all of the off-street
parking facilities available in the City of Miami Beach. In total, more than 9,600 off-street
parking spaces are available in the City. More than 5,000 public parking spaces are available in
the South Beach area as a result of the intensive activity that takes place daily there, making this
service highly necessary.
Table 1 - Existing Off-Street Parking Facilities
Parking Facilities Location (Intersection)Spaces
P1 South Pointe Park- Public Parking 215
P2 South Pointe Dr & Ocean Dr 62
P2 South Pointe Dr & Ocean Dr 149
P3 Washington & Commerce W-S 12
P4 100 Block Washington Avenue 30
P5 4th & Alton 23
P9 11th Street & Jefferson Avenue 120
P10 15th Street & Michigan Avenue(Softball Lot) 134
P11 6th Street & Meridian Avenue 25
P12 9th Street & Washington Avenue 24
P13 10th Street & Washington Avenue 30
P14 6th Street & Collins Avenue 34
P15 1000 Block Collins Avenue 33
P16 13th Street & Collins Avenue W-S 55
P17 13th Street & Collins Avenue E-S 25
P18 Lincoln Lane S & Meridian 40
P19 Lincoln Lane S & Jefferson Avenue E-S 21
P20 Lincoln Lane S & Jefferson Avenue W-S 62
P21 Lincoln Lane S & Michigan Avenue 19
P22 Lincoln Lane S & Lenox Avenue 18
P23 16th Street & West Avenue 31
P24 17th Street & West Avenue (Epicure) 71
P25 Lincoln Lane N & Lenox Avenue W-S 86
P26 Lincoln Lane N & Lenox Avenue E-S 107
P27 Lincoln Lane N & Meridian Avenue 144
P28 Lincoln Lane N & Pennsylvania Avenue 195
P29 17th Street & Convention Center Drive 160
P32 18th Street & Meridian Avenue 886
P33 19th Street & Meridian Avenue (Holocaust) 26
P45 Purdy Boat Ramp 0
P46 18th Street & Purdy Avenue 41 Page 14
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOParking Facilities Location (Intersection)Spaces
P47 1837 Bay Road 0
P48 21st Street & Park Avenue 15
P49 21st Street & Collins Avenue 202
P50 24th Street & Flamingo Drive 23
P51 23rd Street & Liberty Avenue E-S 20
P52 23rd Street & Liberty Avenue W-S 35
P55 27th Street & Collins Avenue 121
P56 34th Street & Collins Avenue= 0a 62
P57 35th Street & Collins Avenue 72
P58 40th Street & Royal Palm Avenue 43
P59 40th Street & Prairie Avenue 70
P60 40th Street & Chase Avenue 80
P61 41st Street & Alton Road 41
P62 42nd Street & Jefferson Avenue 30
P63 42nd Street & Royal Palm Avenue 194
P64 47th Street & Pine Tree Drive 17
P71 46th Street & Collins Avenue 426
P72 53rd Street & Collins Avenue= 0a 159
P80 71st Street & Byron Avenue 30
P81 64th Street & Collins Avenue 65
P82 65th Street & Indian Creek ( Marina) 52
P83 69th Street & Harding Avenue E-S 35
P84 71st Street & Harding Avenue W-S 51
P85 71st Street & Carlyle Avenue S-S 15
P86 71st Street & Bonita Drive S-S 34
P87 71st Street & Bay Drive S-S 35
P88 Normandy Drive & Rue Versailles 23
P89 Normandy Drive & Bay Road N-S 31
P90 71st Street & Bonita Drive N-S 18
P91 72nd Street & Carlyle Avenue 51
P92 72nd Street & Collins Avenue 320
P93 73rd Street & Dickens Avenue 18
P106 75th Street & Collins Avenue 110
P107 79th Street & Collins Avenue= 47
P108 80th Street & Collins Avenue 54
P109 83rd Street & Collins Avenue 105
P110 85rd Street & Abbott Avenue 12
P111 84th Street & Collins Avenue 65
P112 87th & Collins Avenue 15
G1 7th Street & Collins Avenue Garage 646
G2 12th Street & Drexel Avenue Garage 134
G3 13th Street & Collins Avenue Garage 286 Page 15
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOParking Facilities Location (Intersection)Spaces
G4 16th Street & Collins Avenue Garage 803
G5 17th Street & Meridian Court Garage 1460
G6 42nd Street & Sheridan Avenue Garage 620
SPB South Pointe/ On-Street No data
SHOP Sunset Harbour/ On-Street No data
AROD No data
Total 9623
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES
The City of Miami Beach has several designated on-road bicycle facilities in place. Table 2
describes existing bicycle facilities and Map 7 depicts them. The City of Miami Beach’s Atlantic
Greenway Network Plan (AGN) proposes placing nine more bicycle lanes within the City as well
as bicycle paths, bicycle routes, and bicycle boulevards.
Table 2 - Existing Bicycle Facilities
On-Street Facilities From To Length (in miles)
Fountain Street MacArthur Causeway Hibiscus Drive 0.4
Venetian Causeway Bayshore Drive 17 Street 2.6
Alton Road Michigan Avenue Chase Avenue 0.9
16 Street Bay Road Washington Street 0.7
Prairie Avenue 28 Street 44 Street 0.8
42 Street Prairie Road Sheridan Road 0.2
Royal Palm Avenue 42 Street 47 Street 0.2
47 Street Pine Tree Drive North Bay Road 0.6
Mixed-use (Bike and
Pedestrian) Facilities
From To Length (in miles)
Miami Beach
Beachwalk
5 Street 21 Street 1.5
Miami Beach Baywalk Inlet Road MacArthur Causeway 1.1
North Shore Open
Space Park Path
79 Street 87 Street 0.5
Park View Island 77 Street 75 Street 0.2
Miami Beach Drive 24 Street 29 Street 0.3
North Beach
BeachWalk
64 Street 73 Street 0.9
Source(s): City of Miami Beach (2008), Miami Dade County (2008)
In addition to the above, bicycle access is permitted along all arterials, collectors and local
streets. The City has a large network of sidewalks that create a pedestrian system. Sidewalks run Page 16
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOalong a vast majority of its roadway network as can be seen on Map 8. These sidewalks provide
continuous pedestrian circulation capacity between residential, civic, and commercial
destinations. Pedestrian activity is highly influenced by the proximity and variety of land uses, as
well as by the availability of proper facilities. In addition to the dedicated pedestrian facilities,
there are shared facilities accessible to both, pedestrians and bicyclists (Table 2).
There are main pedestrian areas where limited vehicle access is permitted such as Lincoln Road
Mall and Espanola Way. These areas have adequate amenities such as pushbutton crosswalks,
adequate lighting, signaling scaled for different modes of transportation, adequate dimensions
for the demand of pedestrians, etc.Page 17
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 7 – Existing Bicycle Facilities
Source(s): City of Miami Beach, Miami Dade County (2008) Page 18
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 8 – Existing Sidewalks
Source: City of Miami Beach, Gannett Fleming (2008)Page 19
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOExisting Characteristics of the Major Trip Generators
The existing trip generators in the City are mostly along high density employment areas consisting
of retail, entertainment, restaurants, and schools. It should be noted that currently the existing
transit routes provide a very wide coverage to most of the trip generators in the area.
The main trip generators for shopping are along Collins Avenue. A majority of entertainment
venues are scattered throughout the South Beach area. There is also a commercial area located
along Lincoln Road, mainly pedestrian in nature, and is one of the main employment centers in
the City.
The existing major attractors and generators within or outside the City limits are shown in MMap 9
EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSIT FACILITIES
The existing transit system in the City of Miami Beach consists of fixed-route buses, Paratransit
service, disadvantaged service, and demand response service.
Transit Service Area
Currently the existing transit routes serve most of the City of Miami Beach (Map 20). A majority of
the Miami Beach area comes under ¼ mile radius of a transit route. Page 20
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOCongestion Management Process
The Congestion Management Process (CMP)), which has evolved from what was previously
known as the Congestion Management System (CMS), is a systematic approach, collaboratively
developed and implemented throughout a metropolitan region, that provides for the safe and
effective management and operation of new and existing transportation facilities through the use
of demand reduction and operational management strategies. The CMP is required to be
developed and implemented as an integral part of the metropolitan planning process in
Transportation Management Areas (TMAs) – urbanized areas with a population over 200,000, or
any area where designation as a TMA has been requested. Although the CMP is not required in
non-TMAs, the CMP represents the state-of-the-practice in addressing congestion, and should be
considered in metropolitan areas that are facing current and future congestion challenges.
The City of Miami Beach is part of Miami-Dade County’s CMP, and the agency that implements
CMP is the Metropolitan Planning Organization in coordination with the Florida Department of
Transportation.
Chapter 339.177, Florida Statutes, requires a traffic congestion management process. In Florida
this process is called the FFlorida Mobility Management Process (MMP) to better reflect the intent
of ISTEA, and most recently, of SAFETEA-LU, and to emphasize the positive aspects of providing
transportation mobility.
The Congestion Management System has been described as a “7 Step” process; with the
addition of a new “first step,” the Congestion Management Process is an “8 Step” process, as
follows:
1. Develop Congestion Management Objectives;
2. Identify Area of Application;
3. Define System or Network of Interest;
4. Develop Performance Measures;
5. Institute System Performance Monitoring Plan;
6. Identify and Evaluate Strategies;
7. Implement Selected Strategies and Manage Transportation System; and
8. Monitor Strategy Effectiveness. Page 21
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PROGRAM:
The State of Florida’s Transportation Disadvantaged Program provides the mechanism by which
transportation is provided to persons that are unable to travel on their own. Section 427.015 of
the Florida Statutes directs the Miami-Dade MPO to identify Transportation Disadvantaged
projects that will be funded with transportation disabled funds through the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP).
Paratransit Service:
MDT provides public transit services to attract riders in travel markets where fixed-route transit
service is not available. These include programs for the public transportation disabled and
services in addition to Metrobus and Metrorail. The division of Metrobus Para-transit Operations
that deals with this component is the Office of Special Transportation Services (STS). This division
provides a variety of services including demand-responsive services for the elderly and
handicapped, and other public transit services. All of these services are provided for the residents
of the City for destinations both within the City and countywide. These services are described in
greater detail as follows:
x Special Transportation Service –– This service is available to certified/eligible elderly or
handicapped persons. The service provides for countywide curb-to-curb shared rides in a
car or a van for elderly, handicapped or mobility impaired persons who are unable to use
Metrobus. This service is available either by reservation or subscription seven days a
week, 24 hours a day. The average number of weekday boardings for June 2008 was
4,600. A private transportation company under contract to the county provides this
service.
x Florida Medicaid Transportation Program –– This service provides transportation for both
ambulatory and wheelchair clients.
In addition to services provided by MDT, South Florida Commuter Services operates carpool,
vanpool, and ride sharing programs. Many city residents enjoy the benefits of these services.
Accessible Bus Stops:
All Miami-Dade Transit buses serving the City are wheel-chair accessible. As of 2002, there were
743 bus stop locations within the City, from which 184 were ADA accessible. Table 3 shows the
locations of Accessible bus stops as of 2002.
Table 3: Accessible bus stops
Bus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
MBC-
0002.0000
Collins Avenue 17 Street N N Y
MBC- Collins Avenue 18 Street N N Y Page 22
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
0003.0000
MBC-
0003.0100
Collins Avenue 20 Street N N Y
MBC-
0007.0000
Collins Avenue 26 Street N F Y
MBC-
0008.0000
Collins Avenue 27 Street N F Y
MBC-
0009.0000
Collins Avenue 29 Street N F Y
MBC-
0019.0000
Collins Avenue 44 Street N N Y
MBC-
0019.0100
C0llins Avenue #
4441(Fontainebleau)
N N Y
MBC-
0020.0000
Collins Avenue # 4525 N M Y
MBC-
0021.0000
Collins Avenue # 4747 N F Y
MBC-
0022.0000
Collins Avenue # 4833 N N Y
MBC-
0023.0000
Collins Avenue # 4925 N F Y
MBC-
0023.0100
Collins Avenue # 5005 N F Y
MBC-
0024.0000
Collins Avenue # 5101 N F Y
MBC-
0025.0000
Collins Avenue # 5225 N F Y
MBC-
0026.0000
Collins Avenue # 5313 N N Y
MBC-
0027.0000
Collins Avenue # 5401 N N Y
MBC-
0028.0000
Collins Avenue # 5445 N N Y
MBC-
0029.0000
Collins Avenue # 5555 N M Y
MBC-
0030.0000
Collins Avenue # 5601 N M Y
MBC-
0031.0000
Collins Avenue # 5775 N M Y
MBC-
0032.0000
Collins Avenue # 5875 N N Y
MBC-
0033.0000
Collins Avenue 63 Street N N Y Page 23
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
MBC-
0034.0000
Collins Avenue # 6365 N N Y
MBC-
0036.0000
Collins Avenue 65 Street N M Y
MBC-
0039.0000
Collins Avenue 69 Street N N Y
MBC-
0040.0000
Collins Avenue 72 Street N F Y
MBC-
0042.0000
Collins Avenue 76 Street N N Y
MBC-
0054.0000
Harding
Avenue
77 Street S F Y
MBC-
0055.0000
Harding
Avenue
75 Street S F Y
MBC-
0056.0000
Harding
Avenue
74 Street S F Y
MBC-
0060.0000
Indian Creek
Drive
65 Street S N Y
MBC-
0066.0000
Collins Avenue # 5400 S N Y
MBC-
0067.0000
Collins Avenue # 5333 S M Y
MBC-
0068.0000
Collins Avenue 5200 Block S N Y
MBC-
0069.0000
Collins Avenue Op # 5101 S F Y
MBC-
0069.0500
Collins Avenue 5000 Block S F Y
MBC-
0070.0000
Collins Avenue 4900 Block S N Y
MBC-
0072.0000
Collins Avenue 4700 Block S F Y
MBC-
0076.0000
Indian Creek
Drive
43 Street S F Y
MBC-
0077.0000
Indian Creek
Drive
41 Street S F Y
MBC-
0088.0000
Collins Avenue 22 Street S F Y
MBC-
0090.0000
Collins Avenue 19 Street S F Y
MBC-
0091.0000
Collins Avenue 18 Street S N Y
MBC- Collins Avenue 17 Street S N Y Page 24
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
0092.0000
MBC-
0095.0000
Washington
Avenue
2 Street N F Y
MBC-
0096.0000
Washington
Avenue
4 Street N N Y
MBC-
0097.0000
Washington
Avenue
5 Street N F Y
MBC-
0097.0500
Washington
Avenue
6 Street N F Y
MBC-
0098.0000
Washington
Avenue
7 Street N F Y
MBC-
0099.0000
Washington
Avenue
8 Street N F Y
MBC-
0100.0000
Washington
Avenue
9 Street N F Y
MBC-
0101.0000
Washington
Avenue
11 Street N F Y
MBC-
0103.0000
Washington
Avenue
13 Street N F Y
MBC-
0104.0000
Washington
Avenue
14 Street SW F Y
MBC-
0105.0000
Washington
Avenue
15 Street N N Y
MBC-
0106.0000
Washington
Avenue
16 Street N F Y
MBC-
0107.0000
Washington
Avenue
Lincoln Road N F Y
MBC-
0108.0000
Washington
Avenue
17 Street E F Y
MBC-
0113.0000
Pine Tree Drive 24 Street N N Y
MBC-
0138.0000
La Gorce Drive 59 Street S N Y
MBC-
0144.0000
La Gorce Drive 51 Street S N Y
MBC-
0159.0000
Washington
Avenue
20 Street S F Y
MBC-
0160.0000
Washington
Avenue
18 Street S N Y
MBC-
0161.0000
Washington
Avenue
17 Street S F Y
MBC-
0162.0000
Washington
Avenue
Lincoln Road S F Y Page 25
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
MBC-
0163.0000
Washington
Avenue
15 Street S F Y
MBC-
0164.0000
Washington
Avenue
14 Street S N Y
MBC-
0165.0000
Washington
Avenue
13 Street S N Y
MBC-
0168.0500
Washington
Avenue
8 Street S N Y
MBC-
0169.0000
Washington
Avenue
7 Street S F Y
MBC-
0173.0000
Washington
Avenue
2 Street S N Y
MBC-
0190.0000
Meridian
Avenue
18 Street S F Y
MBC-
0228.0000
Alton Road 5 Street N F Y
MBC-
0229.0000
Alton Road 6 Street N F Y
MBC-
0231.0000
Alton Road 8 Street N F Y
MBC-
0231.0100
Alton Road 9 Street N F Y
MBC-
0233.0000
Alton Road 11 Street N F Y
MBC-
0235.0000
Alton Road 14 Street N F Y
MBC-
0236.0000
Alton Road 15 Street N F Y
MBC-
0237.0000
Alton Road 16 Street N F Y
MBC-
0238.0000
Alton Road Lincoln Road Mall N F Y
MBC-
0238.0100
Alton Road 19 Street N N Y
MBC-
0248.0000
Alton Road 39 Street N N Y
MBC-
0254.0000
Alton Road 47 Street NE N Y
MBC-
0271.0000
Alton Road 56 Street S F Y
MBC-
0274.0000
Alton Road 52 Street S N Y
MBC- Alton Road 48 Street SW F Y Page 26
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
0277.0000
MBC-
0278.0000
Alton Road 47 Street SW F Y
MBC-
0279.0000
Alton Road 45 Street S N Y
MBC-
0285.0000
Alton Road North Bay Road SW F Y
MBC-
0287.0000
Alton Road 27 Street S F Y
MBC-
0289.0000
Alton Road 21 Street SE N Y
MBC-
0292.0000
Alton Road Dade Boulevard S N Y
MBC-
0292.0100
Alton Road 17 Street W F Y
MBC-
0293.0000
Alton Road Lincoln Road S F Y
MBC-
0295.0000
Alton Road 15 Street S N Y
MBC-
0296.0000
Alton Road 14 Street S N Y
MBC-
0297.0000
Alton Road 13 Street S F Y
MBC-
0300.0000
Alton Road 9 Street S N Y
MBC-
0301.0000
Alton Road 8 Street S N Y
MBC-
0302.0000
Alton Road 6 Street S N Y
MBC-
0303.0000
Alton Road 2 Street S F Y
MBC-
0306.0850
West Avenue #1620 S N Y
MBC-
0306.0875
West Avenue 15 Terrace S F Y
MBC-
0306.0900
West Avenue Flamingo Way S F Y
MBC-
0308.0000
West Avenue 12 Street S F Y
MBC-
0309.0000
West Avenue 11 Street S F Y
MBC-
0310.0000
West Avenue 9 Street S N Y Page 27
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
MBC-
0311.0000
West Avenue 8 Street S N Y
MBC-
0312.0000
West Avenue 6 Street S N Y
MBC-
0312.0050
Dickens Avenue 72 Street N N Y
MBC-
0312.0100
Dickens Avenue 73 Street N N Y
MBC-
0313.0000
Dickens Avenue 75 Street N N Y
MBC-
0314.0000
Hawthorne
Avenue
77 Street N F Y
MBC-
0316.0000
Hawthorne
Avenue
80 Street N F Y
MBC-
0317.0000
Hawthorne
Avenue
82 Street N F Y
MBC-
0323.0000
South Pointe
Drive
Washington Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0325.0020
Ocean Drive 3 Street N N Y
MBC-
0325.0030
Ocean Drive 4 Street N N Y
MBC-
0326.0500
2 Street Collins Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0327.0000
5 Street Ocean Drive N F Y
MBC-
0327.0100
5 Street Washington Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0329.0000
5 Street Meridian Avenue SE F Y
MBC-
0330.0000
5 Street Michigan Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0331.0000
5 Street Lenox Avenue N F Y
MBC-
0332.0000
Mac Arthur
Causeway
Terminal Isle W N Y
MBC-
0338.0100
5 Street Lenox Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0339.0000
5 Street Michigan Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0340.0000
5 Street Meridian Avenue E F Y
MBC- Lincoln Road Washington Avenue NW N Y Page 28
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
0343.0000
MBC-
0344.0000
Lincoln Road Washington Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0345.0000
17 Street Washington Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0346.0000
17 Street Convention Center
Drive
W N Y
MBC-
0346.0100
17 Street Meridian Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0347.0000
17 Street Meridian Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0348.0100
17 Street Michigan Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0349.0000
17 Street Lenox Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0350.0000
17 Street Lenox Avenue SE N Y
MBC-
0351.0000
17 Street Michigan Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0352.0000
17 Street Jefferson Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0353.0000
17 Street Meridian Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0354.0000
17 Street Pennsylvania Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0355.0000
17 Street Washington Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0356.0200
Dade
Boulevard
23 Street SW F Y
MBC-
0356.0800
Dade
Boulevard
Michigan Avenue SW F Y
MBC-
0356.0900
Dade
Boulevard
Alton Road SW N Y
MBC-
0358.0000
Dade
Boulevard
Purdy Avenue SW N Y
MBC-
0368.0000
Venetian Way E Island Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0368.0700
20 Street Bay Road E F Y
MBC-
0369.0000
41 Street Indian Creek Dr W N Y
MBC-
0370.0000
41 Street Pine Tree Dr W F Y Page 29
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
MBC-
0371.0000
41 Street Sheridan Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0373.0000
41 Street Prairie Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0375.0000
41 Street Meridian Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0376.0000
41 Street Alton Road SW N Y
MBC-
0376.0100
41 Street Alton Road E F Y
MBC-
0379.0000
41 Street Prairie Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0382.0000
41 Street Sheridan Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0383.0000
41 Street Pinetree Drive E F Y
MBC-
0384.0000
41 Street Collins Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0389.0000
63 Street Allison Road E F Y
MBC-
0390.0000
63 Street Indian Creek Drive E F Y
MBC-
0394.0000
71 Street Rue Bordeaux E F Y
MBC-
0395.0000
71 Street Rue Notre Dame E F Y
MBC-
0396.0000
71 Street Rue Versailles E F Y
MBC-
0397.0000
71 Street Bay Drive E F Y
MBC-
0398.0000
71 Street Indian Creek Drive E F Y
MBC-
0399.0000
71 Street Abbott Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0401.0000
71 Street Byron Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0402.0000
71 Street Dickens Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0404.0000
Normandy
Drive
Bay Drive W F Y
MBC-
0404.0100
Normandy
Drive
Rue Versailles W N Y
MBC- Normandy W Bay Road W N Y Page 30
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOBus Stop ID Main Street. Cross Street. Direction Corner Accessible
0409.0500 Drive
MBC-
0410.0000
72 Street Harding Avenue W M Y
MBC-
0410.0050
73 Street Dickens Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0410.0060
73 Street Byron Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0410.0070
73 Street Harding Avenue W N Y
MBC-
0410.0100
77 Street Collins Avenue W F Y
MBC-
0416.0000
77 Street Abbott Avenue E F Y
MBC-
0444.0000
85 Street Crespi Boulevard E N Y
MBC-
0446.0000
85 Street Harding Avenue E N Y
MBC-
0449.0000
85 Street #755 W N Y
Source: Miami-Dade Transit
Park and Ride Facilities:
There are no park and ride facilities within the limits of the City of Miami Beach. Table 4 includes
a list of all park and ride facilities currently operating within Miami-Dade County.
Table 4: Park and Ride Facilities
Park and Ride Facilities Description
Busway/SW 152 Street Connecting bus routes: 1, 31 (Busway Local), 34
(Busway Flyer), 38 (Busway MAX), 52, 57, 252
(Coral Reef MAX), and 287 (Saga Bay MAX)
Busway/SW 168 Street. Connecting bus routes: 1, 31 (Busway Local), 34
(Busway Flyer), 38 (Busway MAX), 52, and 287
(Saga Bay MAX)
Busway/SW 200 Street. Connecting bus routes: 1, 31 (Busway Local), 34
(Busway Flyer), 38 (Busway MAX), and 52
Busway/SW 244 Street. Connecting bus routes: 34 (Busway Flyer) and 38
(Busway MAX)
Busway/SW 296 Street. Connecting bus routes: 34 (Busway Flyer) and 38
(Busway MAX)
Coral Reef Drive/Florida's Turnpike Connecting bus route: 252 (Coral Reef MAX) Page 31
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOHammocks Town Center (SW 104
Street./152 Avenue.)
Connecting bus routes: 104 and 204 (Killian
KAT)
Golden Glades (Where 1-95, US 441, and
the Palmetto meet. Take Metrobus and Tri-
Rail.)
Connecting bus routes: 22, 42, 77, 95X, E, 246
(Night Owl), and 277 (NW 7th Avenue MAX)
Source: Miami-Dade Transit (2008)
ROADWAY ANALYSIS
Adopted Level of Service
Chapter 9J-5 requires that local governments adopt level of service (LOS) standards during peak
hour for roadways and transit facilities. This section of the transportation element deals with the
roadway analysis. For roadways, the adopted level of service shall be measured pursuant to the
following criteria:
x State Roads: State facilities within municipal boundaries shall conform to LOS standards
established by the Department of Transportation. This is the role specifically for facilities
on the FIHS and SIS system.
x County Roads & Local Roads: the county and local roads level of service will conform to
the Miami-Dade County standards.
Level of Service Standards
Table 5 sets the Level of Service standards to be adopted by the City of Miami Beach. These
standards are consistent with FDOT standards for state highways, and with the standards of
Miami-Dade County standards for county roadways. Local roadways will be consistent with the
Miami-Dade County standards.
City, County and State Roads (excluding SIS, FIHS or Trip-Funded facilities)
PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE
STATE, COUNTY & CITY
Local Road D
Collector Roadway D
Minor Arterial D
Major Arterial D
FACILITY TYPE
TABLE 5
ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Table 6 sets the Level of Service standards to be adopted by the City of Miami Beach pursuant to
Rule 14-94 of the Florida Statutes for which sets Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards Page 32
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFor the State Highway System, Roadways on The Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), Roadways on
the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) and Roadway Facilities Funded in Accordance With
Section 339.2819, Florida Statutes, the Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP), SIS
and FIHS Facilities Trip Funded Facilities and Other State Roads3 inside Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs).
Table 6
Limited Access
Highway4 (Freeway)
Controlled Access
Highway4 Other Multilane4 Two-Lane4
D (E) 2 E 2 __2 __2
SIS AND FIHS FACILITIES TRIP FUNDED FACILITIES AND
OTHER STATE ROADS3
(2) Specific assumptions and restrictions that apply to these minimum LOS standards are:
(a) The minimum LOS standards represent the lowest acceptable operating conditions in the peak
hour.
(b) Definitions and measurement criteria used for the minimum LOS standards can be found in
the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 2000.
(c) When calculating or evaluating level of service pursuant to this rule, all calculations and
evaluations shall be based on the methodology contained in Transportation Research Board’s
Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 2000, the Department’s 2002 Quality/Level of Service
Handbook, or a methodology determined by the Department to be of comparable reliability. Any
methodology superseded by the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, such as a methodology based
on the 1997 Highway CapacityManual or Circular 212, shall not be used.
(3) Minimum LOS Standards for SIS Connectors and TRIP Funded Facilities are:
(a) Minimum LOS Standards for SIS Highways.
1. Limited access SIS highways shall adhere to the limited access FIHS LOS standards.
2. Controlled access SIS highways shall adhere to the controlled access FIHS LOS standards.
3. These standards shall apply regardless whether the facility is FIHS, SHS, or under other
jurisdiction.
(b) Minimum LOS Standards for SIS Connectors. The minimum LOS standard for SIS connectors
shall be LOS D.
(c) Minimum LOS Standards for Regionally Significant Roadways Funded by the TRIP.
1. Regionally significant roadways utilizing TRIP funding shall adhere to the Other State Roads
Standards in Chapter 14-94, F.A.C.
2. These LOS standards apply to the TRIP funded portions of the roadways facilities extending to
their logical termini for LOS analysis.
Specific Authority 163.3180(10), 334.044(2) FS. Law Implemented 163.3180(10), 163.3184(4),
334.03, 334.044(10)(a), (12), (19), 339.155(2),
339.2819, 339.61-.64 FS. History–New 4-14-92, Amended 5-8-06.
The level of service standard is used as a guide for planning purposes, to identify the needs and
to plan for the improvements necessary to maintain a desired level of service. Factors which Page 33
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOinfluence the level of service are number of lanes, number of vehicles, speed, control type,
number of access connections, maneuverability, safety and convenience of the public who will
utilize the facilities.
The description of level of service standards in transportation planning are defined as follows:
LOS A- Ideal conditions of primarily free-flow traffic conditions at average travel speed with
minimal delay.
LOS B- Unimpeded traffic flow at average travel speed, the maneuver ability is a little restricted
within the flow.
LOS C- Traffic flow is stable but drivers are more restricted in their choice of speeds and ability to
maneuver as compared to LOS B.
LOS D- Traffic flow is unstable; speeds are tolerable for short periods of time but subject to
sudden variance.
LOS E-Traffic flow is unstable and flow rates variable. This flow is characterized by significant
delays and lower operating speeds
LOS F- Traffic flow at extremely low speeds, congested roadways, high approach delays, and
driving comfort is very low.
Existing Roadway Capacities
For the existing condition analysis, FDOT traffic information was used. FDOT conducts an on-
going yearly program of average daily traffic counts on major roadways. The FDOT existing
traffic as shown on in the tables is based on the projected Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)
for the year 2008. Average annual daily traffic is a year-round average including seasonal and
off-season traffic. Peak hour volumes were obtained by applying a factor of 0.08 for bi-
directional volumes and 0.54 for directional volumes. These are generally accepted average
peak hour ratios used on roadways within the state possessing similar characteristics to those on
the causeways that lead to the City of Miami Beach and other state roads within the City Limits.
Where FDOT traffic information was not available, 48-hour vehicular traffic counts were
collected at locations throughout the City during the months of October and early November of
2008 and converted to AADT by using the appropriate seasonal factors from the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic data base. Table 7 and map 9 reflect the traffic
count locations through the City.
The adjusted field counts as well as other adjusted traffic volume data available from the FDOT
highway traffic networks in conjunction with other available documents provided by the City
formed the basis for obtaining the traffic volumes and assessing current capacities and LOS for
roadways classified as arterials and collectors roads.Page 34
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOReserve roadway capacity was also determined for each of the three Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas (TCMAs) within the City of Miami Beach using the previously approved
methodology by the FDOT and DCA.
The number of through-lanes that exist within the City of Miami Beach at this time are depicted in
the tables as well as in Map 5. The existing number of lanes is shown for arterial and collector
roadways within the City. All other roadways are two (2) lanes, one in each direction.
From the collected data and the pertinent analyses, tables were developed which depict traffic
volumes, capacities, LOS as well as other roadway related data such as number of lanes, class
based in FDOT and HCM methodologies, functional classification, among other. Maps were
also developed which reflect the two-way (bi-directional) peak hour LOS.
Examination of the tables and maps would then indicate which of the analyzed roadways in the
City of Miami Beach are operating at or above adopted LOS. Page 35
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTable 7 – 2008 Peak-Hour, Two-Way Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 355 C 565
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 655 D 265
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 960 D 180
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 300 C 620
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,930 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 800 C 3,130
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 1185 D 1,775
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 1910 D 4450
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 410 C 2700
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 2845 D 305
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1920 D 1230
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3225 F -75
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1155 D 285
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 CITY COLLECTOR 350 C 1090
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 895 D 545
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 3,110 4U 890 2,070 2,340 STATE ARTERIAL 1285 D 1825
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1080 C 3140
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1650 C 2570
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 6,100 6D 4,950 5,080 5,080 STATE ARTERIAL 5715 D 385
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2445 D 3915
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 730 D 190
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 805 D 335
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 270 C 650
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 680 D 240
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 470 D 670
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 395 C 2715
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1210 D 1900
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 935 C 2175
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 695 C 2265
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1080 D 60
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1040 D 100
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3160 F -10
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 3,110 4D 2,470 3,110 3,270 STATE ARTERIAL 3860 F -750
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 3,390 4D 3,300 3,390 3,390 STATE ARTERIAL 3090 C 300
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,300 4U 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3285 D 15
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A/ONE-WAY PAIR NB, 26TH ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 985 C 1815
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,820 6D 1,390 3,180 3,520 STATE ARTERIAL 2830 D 990
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 800 D 570
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 2,490 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 470 C 2020
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 890 D 480
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 375 D 545
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 275 C 645
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 875 D 945
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1130 C 2020
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2105 D 695
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1300 D 1500
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1945 D 855
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 3,300 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 1760 D 1540
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1560 D 1240
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1500 D 1300
FUNC CLASSJURIS
ADJUSTED
STANDARD
SITEROADWAY LANES
SEGMENT ADOPTED AVAIL.
TRIPS
2-WAY
LOS
2008
TRIPS
Page 36
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 9 Existing Roadway Level of Service (Two-Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008 Page 37
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO Existing Hurricane Evacuation Routes
The hurricane season is from June 1 to November 30. A hurricane evacuation plan should be
completed before the arrival of the sustained winds or the onset of storm surge inundation. The
important component of evacuation is the clearance time. The clearance time is a fixed period of
time based on a specific scenario with a given level of threat and behavioral response. It is
recommended that City shall coordinate with the county in continuing to maintain or improve
hurricane evacuations times.
The City of Miami Beach coordinates with the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency
Management related to issues regarding emergency evacuations. The Emergency Routes are
depicted in Map 13. Page 38
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 10 Hurricane Shelters & Evacuation Routes
Source: Miami Dade County (2008) Page 39
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFUTURE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (2030) AND FUTURE TRANSPORTATION
NEEDS ANALYSIS
Future Roadways:
The future roadway system will consist of existing roadways with some planned capital
improvements to widen the roadways. No new roadways are identified in capital improvement
projects or Miami-Dade County MPO LRTP.
The anticipated future roadway system and future number of through lanes are depicted in MMap
11. The anticipated future functional classification is shown in MMap 12.Page 40
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 11 Future Lane Configurations Page 41
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 12 Future Functional Classification Page 42
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFUTURE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLAN
The future pedestrian and bicycle plan should include the following projects identified based on
the needs analysis below:
Future Needs:
The pedestrian and bicycle facility needs were identified based on the following factors:
x Sidewalk network deficiencies
x 2030 population growth
x Current household and employment densities
x Bicycle and pedestrian crashes
x Existing bicycle and pedestrian plans
Needs Identified Based on Existing Sidewalk Network
The City of Miami Beach boasts a large network of sidewalks throughout most of its arterial and
collector roads. However, there are sidewalk gaps in some areas. Table 8 identifies the needs
based on the sidewalk gaps along arterial and collector roads that would help to complete the
existing network of sidewalks. The sidewalk network is also deficient along single family home
neighborhoods. However, improvements along arterial and collector roads should be prioritized.
In addition, the following improvements are recommended based on an analysis of the existing
sidewalk network:
x Some of the sidewalk gaps identified in Table 8 are along canals and waterways. These
facilities should be considered for development of multi-use paths that accommodate
both pedestrians and bicyclists.
x Sidewalk and other pedestrian facilities should be in compliance with the requirements
posed by the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Act.
x Signaling conforming to applicable standards should be provided at pedestrian crossings
and, push-button crosswalks should be installed at school intersections.
Table 8: Sidewalk Segment Gaps along Collector and Arterial Roads
Road From To Road Side(s)Miles
47 Street Royal Palm Avenue Prairie Road N 0.09
Abbott Avenue 72 Street 73 Street E 0.08
Alton Road Chase Avenue Michigan Avenue E 0.92
Byron Avenue 87 Terrace 88 Street E, W 0.04
Collins Avenue 79 Street 87 Street E 0.53
Collins Avenue 85 Street 87 Street W 0.12
Collins Avenue 39 Street 25 Street W 0.69
Dade Boulevard Venetian Causeway 25 Street S 2.15
Harding Avenue 86 Street 87 Street E 0.11 Page 43
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOORoad From To Road Side(s)Miles
Pine Tree Drive 37 Street 28 Street W 0.41
Pine Tree Drive 63 Street 41 Street E 2.14
Prairie Avenue 47 Street 44 Street W 0.29
Prairie Avenue 34 Street 23 Street E 0.68
Source: Gannett Fleming, Inc (2008)
Needs Identified Based On Population Growth, Household and Employment Densities
The City of Miami Beach is one of densest cities in Miami Dade County. The City’s population is
projected to grow 17.73 % from 2005 through 2030. Map 13 shows that the highest household
densities are located along the western and eastern shores of South Beach, and the eastern
shores of Middle Beach and North Beach. While the highest employment densities, as shown on
Map 7, are located predominantly along the eastern shores of the entire City of Miami Beach. As
discussed in the subsequent sections, high-density residential and employment areas also have
higher number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Therefore, special consideration should be
given to high density residential and employment areas in prioritizing sidewalk and bicycle
improvements. Improvements in high density areas will ensure that the benefits of improvements
are available to a larger population. Specific improvements are identified in the subsequent
sections.
Needs Based On Analysis of Bicycle Safety Conditions
Map 14 shows that the highest rate of bicycle crashes have occurred predominantly along areas
with the highest household and employment densities in the City of Miami Beach. The South
Beach section has a higher rate of bicycle crashes due to the local population’s affinity with
cycling and to higher traffic volumes than North Beach and Middle Beach.
Locations with high density of bicycle crashes are identified in Table 9. These improvements are
based on the 2006 Bicycle Safety Program Plan that identified several high-density bicycle crash
locations across Miami Dade County. In addition, the following improvements are
recommended to improve bicycling safety and public awareness about this mode of
transportation:
x A quick response program should be implemented so that complaints about unsafe
bicycling conditions can be quickly responded to by the Public Works department or by
other regional departments that can evaluate and correct any physical safety hazards
identified.
x Traffic laws should be strictly enforced for all roadway users. There have been many crash
occurrences due to cyclists riding the roads in the wrong direction, or operating at night
without illumination. Many motor vehicle drivers are unaware of the 3 foot distance Page 44
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOrequirement between the motor vehicle and bicycle which often results in accidental
collisions.
x The City should promote awareness about cycling safety through educational campaigns
and programs. An educational campaign could comprise of temporary pedestrian and
bike corridors on weekends. Awareness may be raised by the use billboards, vehicle
wraps, newscasts, roadside cyclist fatality signs, and other multi-media formats.
Table 9: Highest Bicycle Crash Locations and Potential Treatments
Location # Crashes Potential Treatments
Alton Road at 17 Street 11 Shared lane; education
Alton Road at 15 Street 9 Shared lane; education
Euclid Avenue at 5 Street 9 Enforcement
Meridian Avenue at 11 Street 8 Education; enforcement
Washington Avenue at 17 Street 8 Shared lane
Washington Avenue at Espanola Way 8 Signs, education
Washington Avenue at 16 Street 7 Shared lane
Alton Road at 11 Street 6 Shared lane; education
Dickens Avenue at 71 Street 6 Signs; education
Jefferson Avenue at 5 Street 6 Signs, education
Washington Avenue at 13 Street 6 Shared lane
Washington Avenue at 14 Street 6 Signs, education
Source: –The 2006 Bicycle Safety Program Plan (Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning
Organization)
Needs Based on Analysis of Pedestrian Safety Conditions
Map 16 shows that the highest rates of pedestrian crashes have occurred within high
density household and employment areas as well. These areas experience high traffic
counts, which increase the likelihood of pedestrian crashes. South Beach in particular has
the highest number of pedestrian crash occurrences due to the high population density in
the area as a result of numerous entertainment and tourist venues. It is recommended that
pedestrian improvements (i.e. sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, signs) be prioritized along
high pedestrian crash areas, followed by high density employment and household areas.
Sidewalk widening is recommended along high density residential and employment areas
that experience a lot of foot traffic. Table 10 shows a list of high pedestrian crash
corridors within the City. Site-specific pedestrian improvements are recommended along
those corridors. Page 45
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTable 10: High Pedestrian Crash Corridors
Collins Avenue 5 Street 22 Street
Washington Avenue 5 Street Dade Boulevard
Alton Road 5 Street Dade Boulevard
Ocean Drive 5 Street 14 Street
Collins Avenue 65 Street 79 Street
71 Street Collins Avenue Bay Drive
Harding Avenue 73 Street Indian Creek
Drive
Normandy Drive Bay Drive Bay Drive
41 Street Alton Road S Collins Avenue
Dade Boulevard Purdy Avenue Collins Avenue
17 Street Collins Avenue West Avenue
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (2005)Page 46
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 13: Household Density
Source: Southeast Regional Planning Model Page 47
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 14: Employment Density
Source:Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model Page 48
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 15: Bicycle Crash Densities (2000-2004)
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization Page 49
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 16: Pedestrian Crash Densities (2000-2004)
Source: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization Page 50
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFuture Transit Improvement Plan:
The future transit plan should include the following projects identified based on the needs
analysis below:
Future Needs
The following factors were considered in evaluating the needs of the City’s transit system:
x Bus Route Network Deficiencies
x Bus Ridership Growth
x Current household and employment densities
x Existing Transit Plans
Needs Identified Based on Existing Transit Network
To maintain the mobility of a multimodal transportation system, it is vital that the City of Miami
Beach has a well connected transit system operating throughout the existing roadway system. The
existing transit system consists of fixed-route buses, Para-transit service, disadvantaged service,
and demand response service. Currently, there are over 15 bus routes operating in the City. Map
15 shows that most of the City is within ¼ mile radius of a bus route. It is recommended that bus
services be provided either by rerouting the existing routes or by introducing new routes to
locations that are not within ¼ mile of a bus route. Specific improvements are identified in the
subsequent sections.
Needs Identified Based on Bus Ridership Growth
Bus transit ridership has increased throughout most of the bus routes operating within the City of
Miami Beach. Table 11 shows the average weekday boarding yearly ridership comparison from
August 2000 thru August 2008. On average, ridership increased 20% from 2000 through 2008.
Based upon this ridership data, the following recommendations are made:
x Increase service frequency along high ridership routes such as 112 L, 119 S, and 123
South Beach Local
x Consider running a skip-stop service along route with high ridership such as 112 L, 119
S, and 123 South Beach Local
Table 11: Bus Ridership Data - 8 Year Comparison
Bus Route August 2000
Ridership
August 2008
Ridership
% increase
51 Flagler Max 1,692 4,304 154.37%
62 4,631 4,320 -6.72%
101 A 353 643 82.15%
103 B 1,454 1,812 24.62%
107 G 3,118 3,155 1.19% Page 51
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO108 H 4,601 4,653 1.13%
110 J 4,709 5,363 13.89%
111 K 4,560 3,897 -14.54%
112 L 10,901 10,509 -3.6%
113 M 1,814 1,640 -9.59%
118 R 359 370 3.06%
119 S 14,315 12,858 -10.18%
120 Beach Max no data 7,631
123 South Beach
Local
no data 6,885
246 Night Owl no data 352
Source: Miami Dade Transit
Needs Identified Based Upon Review of Existing Transit Plans
A review of existing transit plans helped to identify the transit service needs of the City.
Express Transit Service across Biscayne Bay
The 2002 Bay Link Plan addressed the transit mobility needs of commuters traveling from Miami
Beach across Biscayne Bay towards the City of Miami. The Plan consists of a 19-mile streetcar
system that would travel via the MacArthur Causeway and connect with 43 stations along its three
distinct routes.
The 2002 Bay Link Plan identified a need to connect Miami Beach with the City of Miami’s
downtown. However, the planned Bay Link streetcar system is not funded. Therefore, an express
bus service from the proposed South Beach Intermodal Transit Facility to the Government Center
Intermodal Station in Downtown Miami is recommended.
Improved Transit Connections
The public transit service improvement needs identified in Table 12 are based on 2007 Coast
Communities Transit Plan. The plan included an analysis of future needs and identification of
locations for major transit transfer hubs.
Based upon the transit connection needs presented, it is recommended that the City coordinate
with Miami Dade County Transit to prioritize transit improvements along high ridership corridors
identified in Table 9. In addition to public transit service improvements, the following transit
facility improvements needs are also identified:
x Bus pull-outs should be constructed and installed where right-of-way permits.
x Adequate lighting should be provided around all bus-stops for safety.Page 52
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOx ADA accessible Bus shelters, benches, and trash receptacles should be installed along
high frequency bus stops.
Table 12 – Transit Needs
Bus Route Implementation
Priority/Phase
Recommendations
101 A I Extend service to the proposed South Beach Bus
Transfer Station at 23 Street. Provide service to
important destinations across the bay within the City
of Miami.
107 G II Truncate service at the proposed North Beach bus
transfer station. Service change must happen
concurrently with the enhanced frequency service on
Route S and Route T and the implementation of the
proposed North Beach bus station.
108 H II Truncate service at the proposed North Beach bus
transfer station, which must happen concurrently
with the frequency improvements on Routes S and T,
and the implementation of the North Beach Bus
Transfer Station.
110 J I Truncate service at Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Coordinate service with proposed Middle Beach
Intercept park and ride lot.
111 K I Replace the route with enhanced connection
between Route T and Route S. Coordinate service
with proposed North Beach Local and Middle Beach
Local services.
112 L II Truncate service at the proposed South Beach bus
transfer station, which must happen concurrently
with the extension of the South Beach local service.
118 R I Replace the route with proposed North Beach Local
and Middle Beach local services.
119 S II Increase service frequency. Reduce headway by 5
minutes on Sunday, by 3 minutes on Saturday, and
by 2 minutes on weekdays.
123 South Beach
Local
I Coordinate service with proposed South Beach Bus
Transfer Station.
New Bus Routes
Proposed
Phase/Priority New Route Summary
North Beach
Circulator
I The City of Miami Beach is working on finalizing the
North Beach Circulator project, which may be
implemented by mid to late 2009. Page 53
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMiddle Beach
Circulator
I The project proposes a circulator service to link the
neighborhoods comprising the Middle Beach area
of Miami Beach. As a consequence, existing MDT
bus routes would be altered to accommodate the
new service.
New Bus Transfer
Station
Phase/Priority Transfer Station Summary
South Beach Bus
Transfer Station
I Implement temporary street bus transfer facility in
phase I at 23 Street between Collins and Park
Avenue. Phase II calls for identifying a better location
that can accommodate up to 7 buses and can load
and unload passengers safely and easily.
North Beach
Transfer Station
I Implement transfer facility at existing stops between
71 Street and 73 Street on Collins Avenue and
Abbott Avenue. Phase II will construct a bus transfer
facility on City-owned property between 72 Street
and 73 Street, Collins Avenue and Abbott Avenue.
Middle
Beach/Mount Sinai
Medical Center
Interceptor Park and
Ride Station
III The park and ride station would be located at the
Mount Sinai Medical Center site. Phase I calls for a
feasibility study prior to design and construction.
South Beach
Interceptor Park and
Ride Stations
III Two facilities are proposed in the South Beach area.
The first would be located near Alton Road and
MacArthur Causeway, and the second would require
further study to locate an additional facility within the
South Beach Corridor.
Source: 2007 Coastal Communities Transit Plan Page 54
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 17: Bus Service Gaps
Source: Miami Dade Transit (2008) Page 55
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFUTURE ROADWAY CONDITION ANALYSIS
Forecasted Year 2015 and 2030 Conditions
The year 2008 traffic volumes were projected to the years 2015 and 2030 using growth factors
developed from the Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to coincide
with regional planning horizons. Specifically, growth factors were obtained using the MPO’s year
2000 and 2015 networks and applied to the current year 2008 traffic volumes to obtain the year
2015 volumes. Year 2030 forecasted traffic volumes were computed by using growth factors
developed from the MPO’s year 2015 and 2030 networks and applied to the previously
obtained year 2015 traffic volumes. Growth factors were compared with those obtained from the
FDOT traffic projections data base; and, if the FDOT was greater than the MPO growth rates,
the FDOT growth rate was then used.
The roadways within the City of Miami Beach Transportation Network can be expected to
experience relative minor growth while local street growth will be limited because of the low
percentage of developable land still available in the City. Population growth and development
outside the City limits will largely contribute to the minor projected growth in traffic volume on the
arterials. The Miami-Dade MPO’s traffic volumes review land use, potential land use changes
and potential development to evaluate the adequacy of historical growth rates to reflect future
growth. The Corradino Group believes that the growth rates developed by the MDC MPO are
conservative and include the expected growth within the City of Miami Beach. Traffic volume
projections by the MPO adopted transportation plan network are widely accepted by professional
practice including the federal government and FDOT.
Review of planned projects in the 2009 TIP and the adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation
Plan (LRTP) years 2000, 2015 and 2030 reveal that no capacity improvement projects will affect
the roadways geometry and traffic volumes due to programmed roadway widening projects
within as well as near the City and other major projects such as other transportation projects
throughout the City. Tables 13 and 14 show the programmed projects in the TIP and the
priorities from the MPO’s Long Range Transportation Plan.
Tables 15 through 16 and Maps 18 through 19 depict the results of the analyses for the Years
2015 and 2030.
In summary, examination of all the tables and maps in this technical memo indicates which
roadways are operating at the adopted or worse level of service and how these will deteriorate
throughout Miami Beach. Page 56
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOPLANNED PROJECTS (EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED NETWORK)
The Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization’s 2009 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) and the 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) were reviewed for projects
that would affect the capacity carrying capacity of the roadways of the City of Miami Beach.
Review of Tables 13 and 14 reveals that no roadway capacity improvements, such as adding
lanes, are scheduled within the City of Miami Beach. However, other programmed improvements
such as ITS, transit, bicycle and pedestrian in nature will improve operations and reduce vehicles
(modal shift from single occupant vehicles to multi-occupancy vehicles, transit, bicycles, etc) on
the roadway system thus improving capacity and level of service. Projects included as Priority I
and/or in the TIP are considered part of the Committed Network for the future analysis years.
Regional Travel Demand and Needs Assessment
The major concern in terms of transportation is to provide sufficient and adequate facilities to
cope with the planned growth in the area. From the data available, population and development
growth trends, future committed developments, and planned projects, the area is being analyzed
to address these issues. The City of Miami Beach future needs were assessed based on data
available, consistent with Miami Beach County, the Miami-Dade MPO LRTP and the FDOT.
For the determination of existing plus committed network, the validation year (2000) network was
updated to account for any approved or committed improvements in the validation year 2000
network. The E+C includes existing 2000 conditions and all the improvements completed after
2000, all the improvements listed in MPO five year capital improvement projects, and all
committed improvements by developers. The E+C network was employed to determine the future
(2030) improvement needs.Page 57
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTable 13 – Miami Dade MPO 2009 TIP (Committed Projects)
MPO # Facility Limits Type of Improvement
Contstruction
Year
DT4180788 (ADA) STRUCTRE
RELOC Miami Beach DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS N/A
DT4146351 SR A1A/MCARTHUR
CSWY
Ramp to Watson Island to
East of Terminal Island RESURFACING 2009
DT4146361 SR A1A/MCARTHUR
CSWY West Ave. to Collins Ave.RESURFACING 2010
DT2499111 SR 907/ALTON ROAD 5th St to Michigan Ave. RESURFACING N/A
DT2499112 SR 907/ALTON ROAD 5th St to Michigan Ave.
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
RECONSTRUCT.N/A
DT2502361 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE.5th St to Espanola Way
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
RECONSTRUCT.2012
DT2512691 VENETIAN CSWY Bayshore Dr. to Purdy Ave. LANDSCAPING 2009
DT4180671 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE 15th St to N of Lincoln Rd. RESURFACING 2009
DT4105811 VENETIAN CSWY HWY- ENHANCEMENT 2009
DT4209101 WEST AVE.
Brdg from N of Lincoln Rd
to S of 18th St
NEW BRIDGE
CONSTRUCTION N/A
DT2512511 DADE BLVD
BIKE/PED IMPROVEMENTS BIKE PATH/TRAIL 2009
DT4182387 SR 907/ALTON ROAD 5th St to 17th St
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT 2009
DT4213761 HOOD TRAIL
N of 5th St to S of Dade
Blvd.BIKE PATH/TRAIL 2009
DT2496872 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE.22nd St to 24th St DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS 2010
DT4055784 SR 112/I-195
Biscayne Waterway to SR
907/Alton Rd.RESURFACING 2009
DT4180891 SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE
S of 26th St to Indian Creek
Dr.RESURFACING 2010
PW000622 WASHINGTON AVE
BRDG Over Collins Canal BRIDGE REPAIRS N/A
PW0000175 PINETREE DR BRDG Over Flamingo Waterway BRIDGE REPAIRS N/A
PW671804 DADE BLVD/23 ST
BRDG Over Collins Canal BRIDGE REPAIRS N/A
DT2512713 N.BEACH REC
CORRIDOR 53rd St to 64th St BIKE PATH/TRAIL 2009
DT4182386 SR 112/41 ST
SR 907/Alton Rd to Pine
Tree Dr.
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
IMPROVEMENT 2009
DT4198241 SR 112/A GODFREY
RD
SR 907/Alton Rd to
COLLINS AVE RESURFACING 2012
DT4198231 SR A1A/HARDING
AVE.
Bal Harbor Shop to
Entrance 94th St RESURFACING 2011
DT4198581
SR A1A/COLLINS
AVE
150' N of 75 St to Harding
Ave RESURFACING 2012
DT4180951 SR 934/NORMANDY
DR
Rue Notre Dame to Bay Dr
East RESURFACING 2010
DT4198251 SR 934/NW/NE 71ST
Bay Dr to SR A1A/Collins
Ave RESURFACING 2010
DT4226161 SR 934/NORMANDY
DR
W of Bay Dr to Rue Norte
Dame RESURFACING 2011
DT4226171 SR 934/71 ST W of Bay Dr to Bay Dr East RESURFACING 2011
DT4198601 SR A1A/HARDING
AVE 75 St to Indian Creek Dr. RESURFACING 2012
DT2495612 SR A1A/HARDING
AVE NE 87 St to NE 96 St MISCELLANEOUS
CONSTRUCTION 2009
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
Page 58
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTable 14 – Miami Dade MPO 2030 LRTP
Project Roadway Limits Project Description
Miami Beach Transit
HUB
17 St. Lincoln
Rd/Washington Ave.Transit HUB
SR A1A / Collins Ave /
Alton Rd Corridor 5 St to Lehman Causeway
ITS (Includes CCTV, Roadway
Sensors, Arterial Dynamic
Message Signs, Wireless Comm)
79 St HEFT to A1A
ITS (Includes CCTV, Roadway
Sensors, Arterial Dynamic
Message Signs, Wireless Comm)Priority IIIBay Link Downtown Miami to Miami
Beach Light Rail Transit
Bay Link Extension Dade Blvd to 79 St Light Rail Transit
Beach/ A1A 81 St to Miami-Dade
Broward Line Premium TransitPriority IV (Un-Funded)Priority IISource: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
Page 59
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTable 15 – 2015 Peak-Hour, Two-Way Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 410 D 510
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 720 D 200
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1100 D 40
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 350 C 570
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,930 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 900 C 3030
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 1320 D 1,640
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2020 D 4340
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 470 C 2640
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 2930 D 220
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1950 D 1200
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3660 F -510
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1220 D 220
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 CITY COLLECTOR 360 C 1080
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 970 D 470
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 3,110 4U 890 2,070 2,340 STATE ARTERIAL 1380 D 1730
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1360 C 2860
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1750 C 2470
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 6,100 6D 4,950 5,080 5,080 STATE ARTERIAL 6170 F -70
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2640 D 3720
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 810 D 110
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 870 D 270
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 300 C 620
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 750 D 170
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 520 D 620
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 440 C 2670
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1270 D 1840
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 990 C 2120
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 740 C 2220
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1180 E -40
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1140 D 0
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3460 F -310
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 4260 F -1510
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3430 F -680
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,300 4U 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3430 F -130
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A/ONE-WAY PAIR NB, 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1040 D 1760
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,820 6D 1,390 3,180 3,520 STATE ARTERIAL 3030 D 790
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 940 D 430
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 2,490 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 550 C 1940
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1030 D 340
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 440 D 480
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 310 C 610
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 940 D 880
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1290 D 1860
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2270 D 530
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1430 D 1370
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2090 D 710
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 3,300 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 2040 D 1260
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1760 D 1040
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1690 D 1110
AVAIL
TRIPS
2-WAY
LOS
2015
TRIPSSTREET
ADJUSTED
STANDARD
SITEFUNC CLASSJURIS
SEGMENT ADOPTED
LANES
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
Page 60
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 18 - 2015 Peak Hour Level of Service (Two-Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
Page 61
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOTable 16 - 2030 Peak-Hour, Two-Way Roadway Operating Conditions
FROM TO LOS VOL C D E
SB01 11TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 610 D 310
SB02 11TH ST MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 930 E -10
SB03 15TH ST WEST AV MERIDIAN RD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1700 F -560
SB04 15TH ST MERIDIAN RD WASHINGTON AV D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 500 D 420
SB05 17TH ST DADE BLVD MERIDIAN RD D+50 3,930 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 CITY COLLECTOR 1050 C 2880
SB06 17TH ST MERIDIAN RD COLLINS AV D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 1810 D 1,150
SB07 5TH ST/SR 41, MERIDIAN RD OCEAN DR D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 2380 D 3980
SB08 ALTON RD/SR 907, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 540 C 2570
SB09 ALTON RD/SR 907, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 3320 F -170
SB10 ALTON RD/SR 907, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 2220 D 930
SB11 ALTON RD/SR 907, 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 4800 F -1650
SB12 COLLINS AV/SR AIA, 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1380 D 60
SB13 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, BISCAYNE ST 5TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 CITY COLLECTOR 380 C 1060
SB14 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 1,440 2U 400 960 1,180 STATE ARTERIAL 1190 D 250
SB15 COLLINS AVE/SR A1A, 15TH ST 26TH ST D+50 3,110 4U 890 2,070 2,340 STATE ARTERIAL 1950 D 1160
SB16 DADE BLVD W SAN MARINO DR ALTON RD D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 1920 C 2300
SB17 DADE BLVD ALTON RD PINE TREE DR D+50 4,220 4U 1,930 2,810 2,970 CITY ARTERIAL 2180 D 2040
SB18 MACARTHUR CSWY/SR A1A, FOUNTAIN ST ALTON RD D+20 6,100 6D 4,950 5,080 5,080 STATE ARTERIAL 7070 F -970
SB19 5TH ST/SR 41, ALTON RD MERIDIAN RD D+50 6,360 6D 1,850 4,240 4,690 STATE ARTERIAL 3010 D 3350
SB20 MERIDIAN RD 5TH ST 17TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 930 E -10
SB21 MERIDIAN RD 17TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1050 D 90
SB22 OCEAN DR S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 370 D 550
SB23 OCEAN DR 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 910 D 10
SB24 S POINTE DR ALTON RD OCEAN DR D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 630 D 510
SB25 WASHINGTON AV S POINTE DR 5TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 530 C 2580
SB26 WASHINGTON AV 5TH ST 11TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1450 D 1660
SB27 WASHINGTON AV 11TH ST 15TH ST D+50 3,110 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 1160 D 1950
SB28 WASHINGTON AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+50 2,960 4U 1,000 1,970 2,280 CITY COLLECTOR 820 C 2140
SB29 WEST AV 5TH ST 15TH ST D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1430 F -290
SB30 WEST AV 15TH ST DADE BLVD D+20 1,140 2U 450 950 1,200 CITY COLLECTOR 1380 F -240
MB01 63RD ST ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 4010 F -860
MB02 ALTON RD/SR 907, DADE BLVD 41ST ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 4880 F -2130
MB03 ALTON RD/SR 907, 41ST ST 63RD ST D 2,750 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 4280 F -1530
MB04 ARTHUR GODFREY RD/41ST ST/SR 112, ALTON RD INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,300 4U 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 3750 F -450
MB05 COLLINS AV/SR A1A/ONE-WAY PAIR NB, 23RD ST 44TH ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1270 D 1530
MB06 COLLINS AV/SR A1A, 41ST ST INDIAN CREEK DR D+20 3,820 6D 1,390 3,180 3,520 STATE ARTERIAL 3510 D 310
MB07 LA GORCE DR, ONE-WAY SB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1180 D 190
MB08 PINETREE DR DADE BLVD 51ST ST D+20 2,490 4D 1,050 2,070 2,400 CITY COLLECTOR 650 C 1840
MB09 PINETREE DR, ONE-WAY NB 51ST ST 63RD ST D+20 1,370 2 580 1,140 1,320 CITY COLLECTOR 1320 D 50
MB10 PRAIRIE AV DADE BLVD 44TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 620 D 300
MB11 SHERIDAN AV 26TH ST 46TH ST D+20 920 2U 360 760 960 CITY COLLECTOR 380 D 540
MB12 INDIAN CREEK DR, ONE-WAY PAIR SB 26TH ST 41ST ST D+20 1,820 2 650 1,510 1,720 STATE ARTERIAL 1040 D 780
NB01 71 ST/SR 934, E BAY DR COLLINS AV D+20 3,150 4U 1,130 2,620 2,970 STATE ARTERIAL 1670 D 1480
NB02 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2660 D 140
NB03 COLLINS AV/ONE-WAY PAIR NB/SR A1A, INDIAN CREEK DR 71ST ST D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1620 D 1180
NB04 HARDING AV/ONE-WAY PAIR SB/SR A1A, 71ST ST 87TH TER D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2400 D 400
NB05 INDIAN CREEK DR 63RD ST 71ST ST D+20 3,300 4D 1,180 2,750 3,120 STATE ARTERIAL 2650 D 650
NB06 NORMANDY DR/ONEWAY PAIR WB/SR 934, 71ST ST BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 2080 D 720
NB07 71ST ST/ONE-WAY PAIR EB NORMANDY DR BAY DR D+20 2,800 3 1,020 2,330 2,580 STATE ARTERIAL 1990 D 810
2030
TRIPS
2-WAY
LOS
AVAIL
TRIPS
ADJUSTED
STANDARDROADWAY
SITEJURIS FUNC CLASS
SEGMENT ADOPTED
LANES
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
Page 62
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 19 - 2030 Level of Service (Two-Way)
Source: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2008
Page 63
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOIdentification of Needed Improvements
The next step for the future condition analysis is to identify the deficient roadways in E+C network
and identify the needed improvements to maintain the adopted level of service for the deficient
roadways.
Year 2030 traffic projections were obtained from the FDOT planning office and 2030 cost
feasible volumes were used to determine the level of service. To determine th e level of service for
future conditions, year 2030 projected volumes were divided by the level of service thresholds of
the E+C network. The level of service for 2030 network is displayed in MMap 19 and listed in
Table 16.
The needs assessments based on future condition analysis are listed in TTable 17 and TTable 18 is
a project matrix.Page 64
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO
Roadway Link Yr 2008 Yr 2015 Yr 2030
1.Alton Rd (15 St - Dade Blvd)X X X Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street parking lanes, 14 ft
shared-use sidewalks with landscaping.
Intersection improvements including signal phasing/timing and exclusive left-turn lanes.
2.63 St (Alton Rd - Indian Creek Dr)X X X Synchronize traffic signals + signal phasing/timing improvements without impacting pedestrian safety.
Requires further detailed analyses.
3.Alton Rd ( Dade Blvd - 41 St)X X X Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street parking lanes, 14 ft
shared-use sidewalks with landscaping. (Dade Blvd - Michigan Ave)
Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks. (Michigan Ave - 41 St)
4.La Gorce Dr (51 St - 63 St)X X X Further studies to determine increased levels of traffic calming such as wider center islands, chokers, speed tables, etc.
5.Pine Tree Dr (51 St - 63 St)X X X Improve channelization at 51 St.
6.15 St (West Ave - Meridian Ave)X X Convert 15 St and 16 St as one way pairs from Alton Rd to Washington Ave. LOS on 15 St will improve from F to D.
Will require further detailed traffic operations and capacity/LOS analyses.
7.Collins Ave (5 St - 11 St)X X Synchronize traffic signals + signal phasing/timing improvements and provide for pedestrian safety
through better markings, signages and wider sidewalks as feasible. Requires further detailed analyses.
8.West Ave (5 St - 15 St)X X Refer to recent study by the City.
9.West Ave (15 St - Dade Blvd)XX
10.Alton Rd ( 41 St - 63 St)X X Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks.
11.Arthur Godfrey Rd (Alton Rd -
Indian Crk Dr)X X Synchronize traffic signals + signal phasing/timing improvements and provide for pedestrian safety
through better markings, signages and wider sidewalks as feasible. Requires further detailed analyses.
12.11 St (Meridian Ave - Ocean Dr)X Monitor traffic conditions to determine feasibilty of converting 11 St and 10 Street into one way pairs from Alton Rd
to Washington Ave in the future.
13.Alton Rd (5 St - 11 St)X Bus transit headways improvement & roadway improvements.
Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street parking lanes, 14 ft
shared-use sidewalks with landscaping.
Intersection improvements including signal phasing/timing and exclusive left-turn lanes.
TSM recommendations for 5th Street Flyover to include signage & marking improvements, replacing barrier walls and
railings, increase clear width to 17 Ft and at-grade bus-only EB left-turn bay on 5th St and Alton Rd.
14.MacArthur Cswy (Fountain St -
Alton Rd)X Monitor future traffic conditions to determine feasibility of signal phasing and timing improvements without sacrificing
pedestrian safety.
15.Meridian Ave (17 St - Dade Blvd)X Monitor future traffic conditions to determine feasibility of signal phasing and timing improvements without sacrificing
pedestrian safety.
16.Prairie Ave (Dade Blvd - 44 St)X Traffic calming measures such as center islands, chockers, speed tables, traffic circles south of 40 St.
Will require further detailed study.
17.Collins Ave (71 St - 87 Terr)X Concentrate on bus transit improvements such as reducing headways.
18.Indian Creek Dr (63 St - 71 St)X Concentrate on bus transit improvements such as reducing headways.
Peak-Hr Peak Direction
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element - - Proposed Improvements
Proposed Improvement(s)
Operating at LOS E or F
Table 17 Proposed Improvements
Page 65
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element - Evaluation of Proposed Transportation Improvements
Daily LOS Adjacent
Project Project Traffic Without Land Total
Number Description Veh per Day Project Construction R/W Uses Economic Social Energy Connectivity Score Priority
1
Alton Rd (15 St - Dade Blvd)
Reconstruction, traffic operations,
ped safety, landscaping, etc.55 1 55551133M
2
63rd Street (Alton Rd - Indian Crk Dr)
Synchronize traffic signals,
phase/timing improv & ped safety.55 5 55551137MH
3
Alton Rd (Dade Blvd - 41 St)
Reconstruction, traffic operations,
ped safety, landscaping, etc.55 1 55551133M
4
La Gorce Dr (51 St-63 St) Improve
existing traffic calming devices and
channelization at 51 St.15 3 55551131M
5
Pine Tree Dr (51 St-63 St) Improve
existing traffic calming devices and
channelization at 51 St.35 3 55551133M
6
15th Street (West Ave - Meridian
Ave) Convert 15 & 16 St into one way
pair (Alton - Washington)33 3 55351129M
7
Collins Ave (5 St - 11 St)
Synchronize traffic signals,
phase/timing improv & ped safety.33 5 55551133M
8
West Ave (5 St - 15 St) Traffic
operations and ped safety
improvements.33 3 55551333M
9
West Ave (15 St - Dade Blvd) Traffic
operations and ped safety
improvements.33 3 55551333M
10
Alton Rd (41 St - 63 St) Provide for
wider shared-use sidewalks 51 5 35553133M
11
Arthur Godfrey Rd (Alton Rd - Indian
Crk Dr) Synchronize traffic signals,
phase/timing improv & ped safety.53 5 55551135MH
12
11th Street (Meridian Ave - Ocean
Dr) Convert 10 & 11 St into one way
pair (Alton - Washington)13 3 55351127LM
13
Alton Rd (5 St - 15 St)
Reconstruction, traffic operations,
ped safety, landscaping, TSM, etc.53 1 55551131M
Impacts to
Costs
Table 18 Improvement Matrix
Page 66
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO
Daily LOS Adjacent
Project Project Traffic Without Land Total
Number Description Veh per Day Project Construction R/W Uses Economic Social Energy Connectivity Score Priority
14
MacArthur Cswy (Fountain St - Alton
Rd) Traffic signal phase/timing
improvements and pedestrian safety.53 5 55551135MH
15
Meridian Ave (17 St - Dade Blvd)
Traffic signal phase/timing
improvements & pedestrian safety.33 5 55551133MH
16
Prairie Ave (Dade Blvd - 44 St)
Traffic calming measures.13 3 55551129MH
17
Collins Ave (71 St - 87 Terr) Transit
improvements 53 5 55553339MH
18
Indian Creek Dr (63 St - 71 St)
Transit improvements 53 5 55553339MH
20
Bus Route G / 107 - Reduce
headways to 20 minutes.53 5 55553339MH
21
Bus Route M / 113 - Reduce
headways to 20 minutes.53 5 55553339MH
22
Bus Route 62 - Expand coverage to
Lincoln Rd area.53 5 55553339MH
23
Bus Route 120 / Max - Reduce
headways to 20 minutes or less.53 5 55553339MH
24
Proposed North Beach Transit
Circulator 53 5 55553339MH
25
Atlantic Green Way Network (AGN)
proposed bicycle/pedestrian plan.53 3 55553135MH
26
Detailed evaluation of existing
bicycle/ped facilities and identify
improvements and new projects. 53 3 55553135MH
27
City wide TDM inititives for
Carpooling, Van Pooling &
Ridesharing.55 5 55555545H
28
City wide TDM initiatives for Alternate
Work Schedules, Compressed Work
Week, Flextime, Telecommuting,
Staggered Work Hours, etc.55 5 55555545H
29
City wide TDM initiatives to allow for
transportation allowances, financial
incentives, transit fare insentives,
pricing measures,etc.55 5 55555545H
Impacts to
Costs
Page 67
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO
Numerical
Description Value
Daily Traffic Volumes (Vpd)
Low 1
Medium 3 10,001 to 20,000 vpd
High 5 > 20,000 vpd
Existing or Forecasted LOS Without
Improvements Yr 2008 Peak-hour Peak-direction (roadway)
Low 1 A to C
Medium 3 D to E
High 5 F
Construction Costs
Low 5 Up to $250.000
Medium 3 $250,001 to $750,000
High 1 > $750,000
Right-of-Way Acquisition
None 5 No R/W acquisition required.
Small to Moderate 3 R/W acquisition required for Intersection corner radii, small portion of adjacent land less than one City block in length.
Extensive 1 R/W acquisition required along a roadway segment longer than a City block in length.
Impact to Adjacent Land Uses
Low 5 Little or no impact to neighborhood quality of life, recreational facilities, and schools.
Moderate 3 Increase in traffic volumes will not exceed neighborhood livability thresholds, and will not require significant changes to
provide access to schools and recreational facilities.
High 1 Increase in traffic volumes will exceed neighborhood livability thresholds, and will require significant changes to provide
access to schools and recreational facilities.
Economic Impact
Low 5 No displacement of existing businesses.
Moderate 3 Displacement of businesses or access to limited to an intersection or less than a City block.
High 1 Displacement of businesses or access to at more than one intersection and more than a City block.
Social Impact
Low 5 No residential displacement.
Moderate 3 Residential displacement limited to an intersection or less than a City block.
High 1 Residential displacement at more than one intersection and more than a City block.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
1 to 10,000 vpd
Page 68
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOO
Numerical
Description Value
Connectivity
Low 1 No new roadway or transit connections
Moderate 3 Provides new connections to collectors roadways or increase in transit coverage to a small or limited area within the City.
High 5 Provides new connections to arterial roadways or increase in transit coverage to larger areas within and beyond the City.
Energy Impact
Low 1 No increase in fuel savings. Will not result in modal shift from the single occupancy vehicle.
Moderate 3 Moderate fuel savings resulting from modal shifts limited to a specific single project or small area within the City.
High 5 Significant shifts from single occupancy vehicle resulting from major or City wide multimodal improvement projects.
Scoring Range Priority
9 to 21 Low L
22 to 27 Low-Medium LM
28 to 33 Medium M
34 to 39 Medium-High MH
40 to 45 High H
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Page 69
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOFuture Evacuation Routes:
It is City policy to maintain or improve the mobility on the roadways to reduce the clearance time.
The clearance time is a fixed time period on a specific scenario with a given level of threat and
behavioral response.
The future evacuation routes are consists of major north-south and east-west arterials, as shown
in the MMap 20.Page 70
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINOOMap 20 Future Evacuation Routes Page 71
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 1Funding Sources for Local ProjectsFunding Sources for Local ProjectsFunding Sources for Local ProjectsFunding Sources for Local Projects
There are several sources of funding for local projects. Most of this money stems from the
SAFETEA-LU federal transportation authorization of nearly $300 billion. These include Federal
Highway Priority Projects, Transportation Enhancement Program Grants, the People’s
Transportation Plan, the Florida Department of Environmental Protections Office of Greenways and
Trails programs, FDOT’s Highway Safety Grant Program, Concurrency Mitigation Funds and Road
Impact Fees. A bulleted description of each is provided below.
1.1.1.1. Federal Highway Priority Projects (FHPP): Federal Highway Priority Projects (FHPP): Federal Highway Priority Projects (FHPP): Federal Highway Priority Projects (FHPP): The High Priority Projects Program provides
designated funding for specific projects identified in SAFETEA-LU. Over 5,000 projects are
identified, each with a specified amount of funding over the 5 years of SAFETEA-LU.
• These projects are funded by contract authority, and funds are available until expended.
• These funds are obtained via the Congressional Appropriations process.
• FHPP funds require a 20% local match.
• Once earmarks are made, FDOT will manage the funds and project.
• A LAP Agreement between City and FDOT has to be executed for project.
• Contact: Kevin Crowder, Ext. 6186, no later than December/early January.
2.2.2.2. Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) Grant: Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) Grant: Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) Grant: Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) Grant: Transportation Enhancement (TE) activities
offer funding opportunities to help expand transportation choices and enhance the
transportation experience through 12 eligible TE activities related to surface transportation,
including pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and safety programs, scenic and historic highway
programs, landscaping and scenic beautification, historic preservation, and environmental
mitigation. TE projects must relate to surface transportation and must qualify under one or more
of the 12 eligible categories.
• TEP is a small percentage of FHA’s Surface Transportation Program Fund
• MPO receives grant applications by the spring of each year.
• TEP may grant up to $1 million/year for a specific project, but no more than a combined $3
million in one year increments for the same project.
• TEP funds require a minimum 10 percent local match.
• Grant Contact: David Henderson, MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian Specialist, at (305) 375-1735,
or davidh@miamidade.gov
• After grant is awarded, FDOT manages the funds. LAP Agreement required.
3.3.3.3. Peoples’ Transportation Plan (PTP): Peoples’ Transportation Plan (PTP): Peoples’ Transportation Plan (PTP): Peoples’ Transportation Plan (PTP): The Ordinance creating the half-percent transportation
surtax calls for 20 percent of surtax proceeds to be distributed directly to municipalities on a pro
rata basis for use on local transportation and transit projects. Municipalities must apply at least
20 percent of their share of surtax proceeds toward transit uses and must submit their
transportation plans to the County according to established deadlines.
• The City receives approximately $2.7 million of these funds a year to be utilized at 20% for
transit (South Beach Local) and 80% for Transportation projects citywide.
• Out of the 80% funds, a portion can be utilized for bicycle/pedestrian projects on, or
immediately adjacent to a roadway. Beach corridor bikeways do not qualify.
• PTP funds are appropriated by City Commission for a specific project.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 2• PTP funds require a 20 percent local match.
• Contact: Nan Markowitz, Director, or Nestor Toledo, Municipal Liaison, Citizen’s
Independent Transportation Trust, (305) 375-1357.
• June 1st is deadline since interlocal agreement was not signed with the City of Miami Beach.
Regularly boilerplate deadline is November 1st.
FDEP’s Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT): FDEP’s Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT): FDEP’s Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT): FDEP’s Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT): RTP is a competitive program which provides grants
for projects that provide, renovate or maintain recreational trails, trailhead and trailside facilities.
• The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 included the National
Recreational Trails Fund Act (NRTFA) and established the National Recreational Trails
Funding Program (NRTFP).
• The National Highway System Designation Act (NHS Act) of 1995 amended and revived the
NRTFA. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended the previous
legislation and provided for six years of funding. The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) replaced TEA-21.
• Project proposals may address the following recreational trail interests:
1. Motorized Trails
2. Nonmotorized Trails
3. Mixed-Use projects (either motorized, nonmotorized or a combination of both)
• Applicants must submit a completed RTP Grant Application, during the submission cycle of
March 17 – 31, 2008. Applications must be postmarked no later than March 31, 2008.
Applicants may submit only one application during the submission period.
• Applications must involve only one project site.
• Contact: Alexandra Weiss, (850) 245-2052, alexandra.weiss@dep.state.fl.us
• Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) administers the program in
coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA).
• The current maximum grant amount for mixed-use projects and non-motorized projects is
$250,000. The maximum grant award amount for motorized projects it is $592,000.
• Matching must be provided, either 50:50, 60:40, 80:20. The more match provide, the
more points the project will receive.
4.4.4.4. FDOT Safety Office’s Highway Safety Grant ProgramFDOT Safety Office’s Highway Safety Grant ProgramFDOT Safety Office’s Highway Safety Grant ProgramFDOT Safety Office’s Highway Safety Grant Program (bicycle/pedestrian safety): The objective
of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Program is to promote conditions for safe and effective travel by
foot and bicycle in Florida. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Safety Office
provides policy, planning, technical, and funding expertise in consultation with other FDOT
offices and federal and local agencies. Safety Office staff coordinate development and
dissemination of information about walking and cycling safety. The Pedestrian-Bicycle Program
oversees the Florida School Crossing Guard Training Program, the Florida Traffic Safety
Education Program, and the Safe Routes to School Program. District Pedestrian and Bicycle
Coordinators and other District personnel assist with the pedestrian and bicycle aspects of
FDOT projects and activities in the seven FDOT Districts.
• Requests for funding are accepted between January - March 31.
• A request for funding must be submitted on the Highway Safety Concept Paper form
provided by the FDOT/Tallahassee.
• Link to directions and form:
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 3http://www.dot.state.fl.us/safety/HighwaySafetyGrantProgram
5.5.5.5. River, Trails & Conservation Assistance, Florida Field Office: River, Trails & Conservation Assistance, Florida Field Office: River, Trails & Conservation Assistance, Florida Field Office: River, Trails & Conservation Assistance, Florida Field Office: It is the community assistance arm
of the National Park Service. RTCA staff provides technical assistance to community groups and
nonprofit organizations, community groups, tribes or tribal governments, and local, State, or federal
government agencies so they can conserve rivers, preserve open space, and develop trails and
greenways.
• Contact: Jaime Doubek-Racine, (941) 330-8047 or www.ncrc.nps.gov/rtca/nri
• Applications are due by August 1st for assistance beginning the following fiscal year
(October 1st through September 30th). Assistance is for one year, and may be renewed for
a second year upon request. Project selection is generally announced in early November
after passage of the federal budget.
• Projects should include significant community involvement and outreach, and should also
include the commitment, cooperation, and cost-sharing of all partners.
• RTCA does not provide financial assistance to support project implementation.
6.6.6.6. Concurrency Mitigation FundsConcurrency Mitigation FundsConcurrency Mitigation FundsConcurrency Mitigation Funds
• These funds can be used only for projects that increase capacity or mobility in the City.
• Funds are divided into three (3) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) –
North, Middle, and South Beach TCMAs.
• Funds are appropriated and approved by resolution of the City Commission for the
implementation of specific projects.
7.7.7.7. Road Impact FeesRoad Impact FeesRoad Impact FeesRoad Impact Fees
• The County collects Road Impact Fee (RIF) funds from developers. These funds are utilized
by the County on the RIF Districts where they have been collected.
• Miami Beach and Fisher Island constitute RIF District 8.
• All collected RIF funds are sent to the County which controls them.
• The original purpose of the RIF program was to fund roadway and traffic projects on roads
under County jurisdiction, and traffic signal installation/maintenance everywhere. County is
also responsible for the span wire signals. Now all roads in Miami Beach qualify for RIF
funds.
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has been working with cities, counties,
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and other transportation partners throughout the
state to develop the list of selected projects. This effort is based on the established transportation
planning processes. Thirty percent of the highway and bridge funds were allocated for locally-
prioritized projects. For areas with a population greater than 200,000, Metropolitan Planning
Organizations selected projects with input from local governments in their area and technical
support from the FDOT to ensure project eligibility.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 4Federal Requirements for Transportation Stimulus Projects - All candidate projects must meet
federal requirements for federal transportation aid and have been assessed to ensure these
requirements can be met within the approval timelines. The following are examples of
requirements applicable to transportation projects funded under the Act:
• All projects in a metropolitan area must be included in an approved Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
All projects located in a non-metropolitan area must be included in the STIP. The STIP
will be updated periodically to be consistent with the approved projects. See
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/programdevelopmentoffice/federal/stip.shtm for the current
STIP.
• Transit projects must be coordinated with the relevant transit operating agency, MPO or
FDOT.
• Rail and airport projects should be coordinated with the relevant MPO and FDOT.
• Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all projects must have
completed the required assessments of environmental impacts.
• Right of way on projects must have been acquired pursuant to the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies.
• American iron, steel and manufactured goods are to be used in projects, except in certain
instances.
The SDP program is managed in District 6 by Ed Carson. Typically applications are due in May
or June. Funding is a 50% match for a three year period. Operating, some administration,
and some marketing expenses are eligible. SDP is not intended as a funding source for capital
(vehicles, facilities, etc.) although there have been examples of this in the past. The grant
process is competitive. The evaluation criteria include potential for ridership, the ability to help
with traffic problems, consistency with local plans, etc.
Other Funding SourcesOther Funding SourcesOther Funding SourcesOther Funding Sources
FederalFederalFederalFederal
Motor Fuel Tax – primary source of funding for both highway and transit
• Municipal Fuel /1¢ Gal
• County Fuel Tax / 1¢ Gal
• Ninth-Cent / 1¢ Gal
• Constitutional Fuel 2¢ / Gal
• Additional Local Option / 5¢ Gal (Gasoline/Gasohol Only)
• Local Option Fuel Tax / 6¢ Gal
• State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation Tax / 6.4¢ Gal
• Fuel Sales Tax / 11.6¢ Gal
• Additional Diesel Fuel/6¢ Gal
• Gas Tax / 18.4¢ Gal
LLLLocal Option Fuel Taxocal Option Fuel Taxocal Option Fuel Taxocal Option Fuel Tax
• 1-6 cents approved by simple majority of County Commission or vote of citizens
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 5• 1-5 cents approved by super majority of County Commission or vote of citizens
• “Ninth Cent” approved by super majority of County Commission or vote of citizens
• Local Option Fuel Tax for each county
LLLLocal Option Sales Taxocal Option Sales Taxocal Option Sales Taxocal Option Sales Tax
• Charter County Transit System Surtax – approved by vote of citizens
• The seven counties eligible to levy this surtax are: Broward, Duval, Hillsborough, Miami-
Dade, Pinellas, Sarasota, and Volusia (Duval and Miami-Dade have enacted Local Option
Infrastructure Sales Tax – approved by vote of citizens)
ConclusionConclusionConclusionConclusion
There are many transThere are many transThere are many transThere are many transportation funding sources available for the City to implement. The City must portation funding sources available for the City to implement. The City must portation funding sources available for the City to implement. The City must portation funding sources available for the City to implement. The City must
match the applicable source to the type of project and also review the currently projects that are match the applicable source to the type of project and also review the currently projects that are match the applicable source to the type of project and also review the currently projects that are match the applicable source to the type of project and also review the currently projects that are
already completed and the amount of funding available to fund the future needs. already completed and the amount of funding available to fund the future needs. already completed and the amount of funding available to fund the future needs. already completed and the amount of funding available to fund the future needs. We are aware We are aware We are aware We are aware
that the City will have a backlog of projects and may require a 10that the City will have a backlog of projects and may require a 10that the City will have a backlog of projects and may require a 10that the City will have a backlog of projects and may require a 10----year CIP to address all projects year CIP to address all projects year CIP to address all projects year CIP to address all projects
included in the City’s Transportation Plans. The City shall continue to review its CIP on an annual included in the City’s Transportation Plans. The City shall continue to review its CIP on an annual included in the City’s Transportation Plans. The City shall continue to review its CIP on an annual included in the City’s Transportation Plans. The City shall continue to review its CIP on an annual
basis to ensure it is meeting its goals anbasis to ensure it is meeting its goals anbasis to ensure it is meeting its goals anbasis to ensure it is meeting its goals and objective and to review its funding needs in the City’s d objective and to review its funding needs in the City’s d objective and to review its funding needs in the City’s d objective and to review its funding needs in the City’s
Transportation Plans. Transportation Plans. Transportation Plans. Transportation Plans.
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 6
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Future ProjectsFuture ProjectsFuture ProjectsFuture Projects
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IIII1 Transit /
Transportation
Synchronize traffic signals, phase/timing
improve & ped safety.
FDOT Alton Road Collins Ave TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 24,000.00$
IIII2 Transit /
Trans portation
Traffic signal phase/timing improvements and
pedestrian safety.
FDOT Fountain Street Alton Road TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 30,000.00$
IIII3 Transit /
Trans portation
Traffic signal phase/timing improvements and
pedestrian safety.
Public Works 17 Street Dade Boulevard TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 12,000.00$
IIII4 Transit /
Trans portation Traffic Safety measures.
Public Works Dade Boulevard 44 Street TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 600,000.00$
IIII5 Transit /
Trans portation
Synchronize traffic signals, phase/timing
improve & ped safety. Corridor Study.
Public Works Alton Road Indian Creek Drive TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 128,000.00$
I*I*I*I* 6
Transit /
Trans portation Intersection Improvments.
Public Works Dickens - TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
City Project ? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 434,878.00$
IIIIIIII 7
Transit /
Trans portation
Reconstruction, traffic operations, ped safety,
landscaping, etc.
FDOT 5 Street Michigan Avenue TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 11,951,118.54$
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components
Alton Road
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority
MacArthur Causeway Proposed Funding ($s)
Arthur Godfrey Road
Proposed Funding ($s)
Proposed Funding ($s)
Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
Meridian Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
Prairie Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
71 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
63rd Street Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 7
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Future ProjectsFuture ProjectsFuture ProjectsFuture Projects
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IIIIIIII 8
Transit /
Transportation
Reconstruction, traffic operations, ped safety,
landscaping, etc.
FDOT Michigan Avenue 41 Street TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 13,743,598.31$
IIIIIIII 9
Transit /
Transportation
Further studies to increase levels of traffic
calming.
Public Works 51 Street 63 Street TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000.00
IIIIIIII 10
Transit /
Transportation
Improve traffic safety and channelization at
51 St.
Public Works 51 Street 63 Street TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000.00
IIIIIIII 11
Transit /
Transportation
Synchronize traffic signals, phase/timing
improve & ped safety.
FDOT 5 Street 11 Street TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 28,800.00$
IIIIIIII 12
Transit /
Transportation
Traffic operations, bike lanes and ped safety
improvements.
Public Works 5 Street Dade Boulevard TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1,000,000.00$
IIIIIIII 13
Transit /
Transportation Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks.
Public Works 41 Street 63 Street TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 180,000.00$
IIIIIIIIIIII 14
Transit /
Transportation
15 & 16 St one way pair Feasibility
Study/TDM (Part of the Alton Rd -
Washington Ave feasibility study).
Public Works West Avenue Meridian Avenue TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 250,000.00$
IIIIIIIIIIII 15
Transit /
Transportation
10 & 11 St one way pair Feasibility
Study/TDM (Part of the Alton Rd -
Washington Ave feasibility study).
Public Works Meridian Avenue Ocean Drive TE $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 250,000.00$
Priority
I High Priority: Existing 0-5 Years
II Medium Priority: 5-10 Years
III Lower Prioirty: 10-20 Years
La Gorce Drive Proposed Funding ($s)
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components
Proposed Funding ($s)
Collins Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
West Ave Proposed Funding ($s)
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority
Pine Tree Drive Proposed Funding ($s)
Alton Road Proposed Funding ($s)
11 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
Alton Road Proposed Funding ($s)
15th Street
Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 8
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
I I I I1A Transit /
Transportation Alternative Mode Feasibility Study
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 120,000.00$
IIII17A Transit /
Transportation
Transit development plan needs to address: Routes, Connections, Headways,
Operations & Maintenance.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 40,000.00$
IIII11A Transit /
Transportation
Because bus stop locations on Pinetree drive are difficult to access, it is
believed that relocation to a more convenient location would provide greater
safety and ease of use. Physical evaluation of each bus stop location
performed, and recommendations for more effective placement. This will lead
to the design and replacement of stops.
Public Works Pine Tree Dr. CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 330,000.00
IIII2C Transit /
Transportation
This project will study ways to provide increased capacity on Collins Ave while
identifying ways to calm traffic in residential areas and limit the traffic backups
caused by commercial delivery trucks. A comprehensive multi-modal
transportation study of the Collins Ave corridor will provide analysis of the
feasibility of various strategies to improve the livability of neighborhoods on
this roadway without increasing the ROW.
Public Works - - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 80,000.00$
IIII1 CA Transit /
Transportation
This project will study ways to provide increased capacity on each of the
causeways focusing on improving regional mobility for the communities on
the barrier islands. An analysis of the major east/west corridors is required to
determine appropriate operational improvements.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 60,000.00$
IIII3CA Transit /
Transportation
This study is designed to test the traffic impact of converting two way streets
into one-way streets in certain residential districts, particularly in South Beach.
The potential may occur to increase the number of on-street parking spaces,
by implementing angled parking, as opposed to parallel parking. The scope
of services for this project should focus on examining the Flamingo
Neighborhood, by looking at right of way widths, travel lane widths, parking
lane widths and number of parking spaces.
Public Works South Beach CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 50,000.00$
I I I I 5CA Transit /
Transportation
This study is designed to improve the level of service at major signalized
intersection through various improvements.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 450,000.00$
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority
Intersection Improvements Proposed Funding ($s)
Proposed Funding ($s)
Collins Avenue Corridor Study Proposed Funding ($s)
Causeway and East/West Flow
Enhancements Proposed Funding ($s)
One-way Residential Streets Proposed Funding ($s)
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
Intermodal Feasibility Study Proposed Funding ($s)
Costal Communities Transit
Development Plan Proposed Funding ($s)
Reexamine Bus Stop Location on
Pinetree Drive
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 9
Cit y of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Coastal Communities Trans p ortation Master PlanCoastal Communities Trans p ortation Master PlanCoastal Communities Trans p ortation Master PlanCoastal Communities Trans p ortation Master Plan
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components
IIII 6CA Transit /
Transportation
This study will take pedestrian counts at a dozen key intersections.
Locations where pedestrian traffic is minimal, sporadic, and contain
pedestrian crossing phases, will be converted to on-demand or pedestrian
actuated signals. The impact of this conversion will be assessed.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 30,000.00$
IIII 7CA Transit /
Transportation
This study will determine the location of major transportation conduits, such
as Collins Avenue, Harding Avenue, Alton R oad, Indian Creek Boulevard,
Sunny Isles Boulevard Kane Concourse and Normandy Drive and 71st
Street.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 35,000.00$
IIII9CA Transit /
Transportation
After construction is completed the area should be analyzed. Traffic volumes
on each road and turning movement counts at major intersection can be
taken. Three alternatives for traffic movement will be analyzed in by using a
micro-simulation tool. After public involvement with the community a
preferred alternative shall be selected.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 30,000.00$
IIIIIIII 9A Transit /
Transportation
Technologies which could be used to move buses through the system faster
than private vehicles will be explored. These include: special use lanes, bus
pullouts, queue jumpers, signal prioritization, GPS, Medina/Shoulder
Transitway and remote vehicle tracking and scheduling.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 55,000.00$
IIIIIIII 13A Transit /
Transportation
Review all previous plans including bikeway and pedestrian plans, roadway
plans, plans for intermodal centers. Assure that the edestrian and bicycle
amenities are provided at key intermodal locations, traffic generators and
transit stations. Inventory these facilities, assess the level of service for
these amenities using FDOT Q/LOS criteria, recommend necessary
im provements and cost of improvements.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 45,000.00$
IIIIIIII 14A Transit /
Transportation
Transit passes can be used by municipal and private sector employees as a
benefit to the employee.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
63rd Street Travel Patterns Proposed Funding ($s)
Examine Locations for On-Demand
Pedestrian Signal Proposed Funding ($s)
Transit Bus Priority Proposed Funding ($s)
Enhance Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit
Linkages Proposed Funding ($s)
Proposed Funding ($s)Free Transit Passes for City Employes
On Street Parking Management Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 10
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IIIIIIII 4C
Transit /
Transportation
In an effort to further diversify the land use mix in the central zone of the study
area, the utilization of the parking lots between Collins Avenue and Harding
Avenue in Miami Beach between 77th Street and 87th Street as an economic
development area can be examined. The removal of the one way pair and
reinstatement of both roads as two way facilities should be examined as it
would better interact with this type of development. This analysis would review
the conceptual design for the development in the area.
Public Works - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 80,000.00$
IIIIIIII 1P
Transit /
Transportation
To coordinate and manage transportation in the coastal communities, this
position would act as a liaison between the cities, the citizens, the
development community, local employers, and other local, county and state
transportation authorities. The primary focus would be to manage
concurrency, oversee developer activity, and interface with businesses to
implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies. This
position would coordinate Transportation Demand Management strategies
with local employers, act as a liaison, with MDCPW, MDT, MPO, and FDOT,
in an attempt to develop and implement projects as a result of this report. This
could be an additional position, or one which could be added to an existing
position.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
IIIIIIII 18A
Transit /
Transportation
The purpose of this project has come from the acknowledgement that a
higher level of transit service is needed, and that this needs to be actively
sought. Additionally a method to do this is to provide ample space for
automobile parking on the periphery of the most densely populated
economically diverse areas so that drivers have an option of leaving their
vehicles outside of urban areas. The goal of increasing transit ridership or
achieving a more balanced modal split can be accomplished by providing
specialized transit services.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 30,000.00$
IIIIIIII 4P
Transit /
Transportation
Transportation Demand Management programs will provide incentives, and
market management to affect travel behavior to shift to non-motorized and/or
higher occupancy modes in order to reduce congestion on the roadways in
the coastal communities. Transportation Demand Management strategies
would utilize the services offered by the South Florida Commuter Services by
encouraging businesses to take advantage of the programs.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
IIIIIIII 5P
Transit /
Transportation
The purpose of this is to provide more strict and consistent enforcement of
parking, and delivery regulations on the major corridors within the study area.
Implementation of this policy is a commitment on keeping vehicles from
blocking thoroughfares at prohibited times.
Public Works Cit Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
IIIIIIII 6P
Transit /
Transportation
The purpose of this is to examine the feasibility of instituting parking impact
fees to pay for various transportation improvements. Evaluate the need and
desire for the various participating communities to implement parking impact
fees. A draft fee structure should be developed.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority
Police Enforcement to Enhance Traffic
Flow Proposed Funding ($s)
Examine Parking Impact Fees Proposed Funding ($s)
Reexamine Collins / Harding One Way
Pair Proposed Funding ($s)
Liaison with South Florida Commuter
Services Proposed Funding ($s)
Transportation Systems Management
(TSM)Proposed Funding ($s)
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
Parking Facilities with Shuttles Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 11
Cit y of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Coastal Communities Trans p ortation Master PlanCoastal Communities Trans p ortation Master PlanCoastal Communities Trans p ortation Master PlanCoastal Communities Trans p ortation Master Plan
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
A pprop riationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components
IIIIIIII 7P Transit /
Transportation
This study will undertake a demographic analysis to measure the number of
vehicles per household in the North Beach area.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 40,000.00$
IIIIIIII 10P
Transit /
Transportation
This effort would examine policies for alternative modes of transportation
like,
bicycles, scooters or segways. The examination should look at how other
communities manage their use.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5,000.00$
IIIIIIII 11P Transit /
Transportation
Research various car sharing approaches and select one that best fits the
coastal communities. Im plement a program quickly .
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5,000.00$
IIIIIIII 12P
Transit /
Transportation
This project would research similar programs implemented by cities across
the
country.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5,000.00$
IIIIIIII 13P Transit /
Transportation
Shift the utilization of concurrency fees paid by the development community
to the development of transit capacity projects, instead of roadway capacity
projects. Measurement of person trips instead of vehichle trips can show
how adequate mitigation is beign provided.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
IIIIIIII NA Transit /
Transportation
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
Transportation Trust Fund Proposed Funding ($s)
Shared Cars/Zip Cars Proposed Funding ($s)
Driver Behavior Campaign Proposed Funding ($s)
R eassignment of Concurrency Fees to
Transit Proposed Funding ($s)
Personal Mobility Devices Proposed Funding ($s)
Re-Examine Residential Parking
Requirements Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 12
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.Future Projects Costal Comm.
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IIIIIIIIIIII 4A
Transit /
Transportation
This project would study routes and modes available to provide a connection
to the coastal communities as part existing and future rail system, linking the
barrier island communities with the airport, the Port of Miami, Downtown
Miami and beyond. This project is designed to improve the level of service
along the major roadways within the study area by providing improved transit
service. The Study would examine the most appropriate causeway and mode
for the east/west mass transit connection.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1,500,000.00$
IIIIIIIIIIII 2A
Transit /
Transportation
Increase transit ridership by appealing to commuters that are either not aware
of the transit system or not comfortable using it. Providing excellent quality
transit throughout the coastal communities is essential to increasing options
for modes of transportation other than a personal vehicle, yet informing the
public of the options is crucial to boosting ridership, particularly to choice
riders. Develop ways to increase opportunities for the general public to have
access to transit information including bus and rail line routes, schedules and
facilities. In addition strategies would be developed to aggressively market
transit service to choice riders.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 75,000.00$
IIIIIIIIIIII 3A
Transit /
Transportation
The purpose of this project is to provide amenities on transit buses, stops and
stations that would serve attractive to choice riders. Initially this would
examine state of the art technologies and look at examples of similar systems
and the potential within the MDT system.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 75,000.00$
IIIIIIIIIIII 5A
Transit /
Transportation
Prioritize the Northeast Corridor, as the highest transit priority, so that it
attains federal matching funds, and is subsequently designed and constructed
in the nearest timeframe to begin to provide service. This project, under the
name of “South Florida East Coast Corridor Transit Analysis Study (SFECCTA)
is being undertaken now in regional cooperation, sponsored by the South
Florida Regional Transit Authority, the MPO’s of Miami-Dade, Broward, and
Palm Beach Counties, and FDOT.
Public Works City Wide - CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
IIIIIIIIIIII 3P
Transit /
Transportation
The purpose of this project is to utilize technology to improve the existing
transportation network and relieve traffic congestion. Intelligent Transportation
Systems include such things as installing cameras to monitor the flow of traffic
and be able to view accidents in real time.
Public Works City Wide CCTMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TBD
Priority
I High Priority: Existing 0-5 Years
II Medium Priority: 5-10 Years
III Lower Priority: 10-20 Years
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority
Enhanced Bus Amenities Proposed Funding ($s)
Support Northeast Corridor Alternatives
Analysis Proposed Funding ($s)
Cross Bay Rail Transit Alternatives
Analysis Proposed Funding ($s)
Enhanced Bus Marketing Proposed Funding ($s)
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)Proposed Funding ($s)
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 13
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
FP Costal Comm TransitFP Costal Comm TransitFP Costal Comm TransitFP Costal Comm Transit
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
T2 Transit /
Transportation
Implement A1A Corridor & Local Express
Routes with Existing Bus Resources
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T7 Transit /
Transportation Routes Extensions and Adjustments
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T8 Transit /
Transportation Reconfigured from Routes R & K
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T9 Transit /
Transportation Extend Route W
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T12, (TS)Transit /
Transportation
Off-Street, Bus Bays, Shelters, ITS, Pre
Payment, Retail & Mix-Use Components
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T13&19 Transit /
Transportation
Initial Capital Improvments of Bus Rapid
Transit & Station Development
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T17 Transit /
Transportation Bus Rapid Transit Along A1A
Public Works City Wide CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
T20 (PR)Transit /
Transportation Implement Park & Ride Stations
Public Works City Wide - CCTP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
Priority
I High Priority: Existing 0-5 Years
II Medium Priority: 5-10 Years
III Lower Prioirty: 10-20 Years
Proposed Funding ($s)
South Beach Local Proposed Funding ($s)
Develop Trasfer Stations
Park & Ride Proposed Funding ($s)
BRT A1A Proposed Funding ($s)
BRT & Stations
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
A1A & Local Express Routes Proposed Funding ($s)
Proposed Funding ($s)
North Beach Local Proposed Funding ($s)
Middle Beach Circulator Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 14
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
FP Atlantic Greenway Network FP Atlantic Greenway Network FP Atlantic Greenway Network FP Atlantic Greenway Network
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IIIIIIII A1
Transit /
Transportation
To be constructed by FDOT, County or City
Public Works or CIP Department
Public Works North-South East-West AGN $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
TBDTBDTBDTBD A2
Transit /
Transportation
Design & construction to correct systemwide
gaps
Public Works City Wide AGN $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
Priority
I High Priority: Existing 0-5 Years
II Medium Priority: 5-10 Years
III Lower Prioirty: 10-20 Years
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
Identified Needs within the Pedestrian &
Bike Network Proposed Funding ($s)
South, Middle, and North Beach
Neighborhood Bikeways Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 15
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
FP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility Plan
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
M1 Transit /
Transportation
Neighborhood Traffic Calming, Street
Improvements
Public Works North Beach MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M2 Transit /
Transportation Enhancements
Public Works City Wide MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M3 Transit /
Transportation Circualtion Improvments
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M4 Transit /
Transportation Corridor Enhancements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M5 Transit /
Transportation Capacity Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M6 Transit /
Transportation Improvements / Regulation Program
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M7 Transit /
Transportation Capacity Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M8 Transit /
Transportation Realignment
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
North Beach Calming Proposed Funding ($s)
Harding Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
Biscayne Elementary School Proposed Funding ($s)
Normandy Drive / 71 St Proposed Funding ($s)
Indian Creek Drive Proposed Funding ($s)
Collins Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
63 Street / Indian Creek Drive Proposed Funding ($s)
Collins Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 16
City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
FP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility Plan
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
M9 Transit /
Transportation Traffic Calming / Safety Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M10 Transit /
Transportation Traffic Calming Project
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M11 Transit /
Transportation Intersection Capacity Imprvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M12 Transit /
Transportation Streetscape
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M13 Transit /
Transportation Intersection Alignment
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M14 Transit /
Transportation Intersection Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M15 Transit /
Transportation Enhancements / Operational Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M16 Transit /
Transportation Traffic Calming Program
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M17 Transit /
Transportation Enhancements / Operational Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropriations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
Flamingo Park Neighborhood Proposed Funding ($s)
Washington Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
Dade Boulevard & 23 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
Dade Boulevard Proposed Funding ($s)
10 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
Nautilus Neighborhood Proposed Funding ($s)
43 Street & Alton Road Proposed Funding ($s)
41 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
47 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 17 City of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami BeachCity of Miami Beach
FP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility PlanFP Municipal Mobility Plan
Project NumberProject NumberProject NumberProject Number DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
DepartmentDepartmentDepartmentDepartment From / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / LocationFrom / Location To / LocationTo / LocationTo / LocationTo / Location CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental CostOperations Annual Incremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior Total Prior
AppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriationsAppropriations 2010-20112010-20112010-20112010-2011 2011-20122011-20122011-20122011-2012 2012-20132012-20132012-20132012-2013 2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
M18 Transit /
Transportation Operational Improvements
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
M19 Transit /
Transportation Grand Boulevard
Public Works MMP $0 Source
Total Prior
Appro priations 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NA
Collins Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
Ocean Drive Proposed Funding ($s)
Facility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project NameFacility / Project Name Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project Estimated Project
CostCostCostCost
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 18
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority Project Project Project Project
NumberNumberNumberNumber DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
Depart-Depart-Depart-Depart-
mentmentmentment
From / From / From / From /
LocationLocationLocationLocation
To / To / To / To /
LocationLocationLocationLocation CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Operations Annual Operations Annual Operations Annual
Incremental CostIncremental CostIncremental CostIncremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource
Total Total Total Total
Prior Prior Prior Prior
AppropriAppropriAppropriAppropri
ationsationsationsations
2010-2010-2010-2010-
2011201120112011
2011-2011-2011-2011-
2012201220122012
2012-2012-2012-2012-
2013201320132013
2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IN1
Transit /
Transport
ation
Neighborhood Traffic Calming,
Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements,
Feasibility, Design Standards
Planning
Collins Av
to Indian
Creek
69 St to
72 St
NBTC
Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,000
IN2
Transit /
Transport
ation
Traffic Study, Redesign street,
Bicycle lanes, Pedestrian
Improvements
Planning Ocean
Indian
Creek
Waterway
NBTC
Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $15,000
IN3
Transit /
Transport
ation
Feasibility study 2-way traffic flow
Planning Indian
Creek Dr 69 Street Dev.
impacts $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $10,000
IN4
Transit /
Transport
ation
Bicycle Lanes or Bicycle Boulevard
Planning 5 St
Collins
Canal
Alton
Road Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,000
Facility / Project Facility / Project Facility / Project Facility / Project
NameNameNameName Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Project CostProject CostProject CostProject Cost
North Beach Town
Center Complete
Streets
Proposed Funding ($s)
69 Street Proposed Funding ($s)
Harding Avenue Proposed Funding ($s)
Lenox Ave Bicycle
Corridor Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element CORRADINO
Page 19
PriorityPriorityPriorityPriority Project Project Project Project
NumberNumberNumberNumber DomainDomainDomainDomain Type of WorkType of WorkType of WorkType of Work
Depart-Depart-Depart-Depart-
mentmentmentment
From / From / From / From /
LocationLocationLocationLocation
To / To / To / To /
LocationLocationLocationLocation CategoryCategoryCategoryCategory Operations Annual Operations Annual Operations Annual Operations Annual
Incremental CostIncremental CostIncremental CostIncremental Cost SourceSourceSourceSource
Total Total Total Total
Prior Prior Prior Prior
AppropriAppropriAppropriAppropri
ationsationsationsations
2010-2010-2010-2010-
2011201120112011
2011-2011-2011-2011-
2012201220122012
2012-2012-2012-2012-
2013201320132013
2014-2014-2014-2014-
2015201520152015
2015-2015-2015-2015-
2016201620162016
2016-2016-2016-2016-
2017201720172017
2017-2017-2017-2017-
2018201820182018
2018-2018-2018-2018-
2019201920192019 TotalTotalTotalTotal
IN5
Transit /
Transport
ation
Install pedestian crosswalks with
flashing signals at 9 St and 13 St;
move existing ped signal from
midblock to 14 St.
Planning 9 St 14 St
Alton
Road Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,000
II N6
Transit /
Transport
ation
Pedestrian crosswalk safety
improvements
Planning 5 St 6 St
Alton
Road Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,000
II N7
Transit /
Transport
ation
Construct a pedestrian baywalk
connection over or under the
causeway bridge
Planning 5 St
Alton
Road Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $5,000,000
II N8
Transit /
Transport
ation
Improve sidewalks, shade trees
and crosswalks on 6, 10, 13, 14
and 16 Streets where there are no
planned GO Bond streetscape
enhancements
Planning 5 - 16 St
from Bay
to
Jefferson
Av
Alton
Road Plan $0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
? -$
? -$
? -$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $200,000
IN9
Transit /
Transport
ation
Provide secure bicycle lockers,
cages, shower facilities in City
buildings and parking garages.
Planning CIP
Parking Citywide
NBTC
and Alton
Rd Plan
$0 Source
Total Prior
Appropria
tions
2010-
2011
2011-
2012
2012-
2013
2014-
2015
2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019 Total
N/A -$
-$
-$
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,000
Facility / Project Facility / Project Facility / Project Facility / Project
NameNameNameName Funding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding ComponentsFunding Components
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Project CostProject CostProject CostProject Cost
Alton Road
Pedestrian
Crosswalks I
Proposed Funding ($s)
Off-Street Bicycle
Parking Proposed Funding ($s)
Alton Road
Pedestrian
Crosswalks II
Proposed Funding ($s)
Baywalk Crossing at
MacArthur Causeway Proposed Funding ($s)
Sidewalk
Enhancements for
Bay Access
Proposed Funding ($s)
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 20Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 1111
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: 63636363rdrdrdrd Street Intersection ImprovementsStreet Intersection ImprovementsStreet Intersection ImprovementsStreet Intersection Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: TranspTranspTranspTransportation Elementortation Elementortation Elementortation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2008 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Synchronize traffic signals & signal phasing/timing improvements without impacting pedestrian
safety. Requires further detailed analyses.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Synchronize traffic signals, phase/timing improve & pedestrian safety from Alton Road
to Collins Avenue.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $24,000$24,000$24,000$24,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
ConstructionConstructionConstructionConstruction::::
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 21Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 2222
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: MacArthur Causeway Intersection ImprovementsMacArthur Causeway Intersection ImprovementsMacArthur Causeway Intersection ImprovementsMacArthur Causeway Intersection Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Monitor future traffic conditions to determine feasibility of signal phasing and timing
improvements without sacrificing pedestrian safety.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Traffic signal phase/timing improvements and pedestrian safety from Fountain Street to
Alton Road.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $30,000$30,000$30,000$30,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority:Priority:Priority:Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 22Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 3333
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Meridian Avenue Intersection ImprovementsMeridian Avenue Intersection ImprovementsMeridian Avenue Intersection ImprovementsMeridian Avenue Intersection Improvements
PrPrPrProject Category: oject Category: oject Category: oject Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Monitor future traffic conditions to determine feasibility of signal phasing and timing
improvements without sacrificing pedestrian safety.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Synchronize traffic signals, phase/timing improve & pedestrian safety from 17 Street to
Dade Boulevard.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $12,000$12,000$12,000$12,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority:Priority:Priority:Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 23Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 4444
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Prairie Avenue Traffic Safety MeasuresPrairie Avenue Traffic Safety MeasuresPrairie Avenue Traffic Safety MeasuresPrairie Avenue Traffic Safety Measures
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Traffic calming measures such as center islands, chockers, speed tables, traffic circles south of
40 St. Will require further detailed study.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Prairie Avenue from Dade Boulevard to 44 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $600,000$600,000$600,000$600,000
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 24Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 5555
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Arthur Godfrey Road Corridor StudyArthur Godfrey Road Corridor StudyArthur Godfrey Road Corridor StudyArthur Godfrey Road Corridor Study
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2015 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Synchronize traffic signals & signal phasing/timing improvements and provide for pedestrian
safety through better markings, signages and wider sidewalks as feasible. Requires further
detailed analyses.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Synchronize traffic signals, phase/timing improvements and pedestrian safety. Study the
Corridor from Alton Road to Indian Creek Drive.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $128,000$128,000$128,000$128,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 25Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 6666
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: 71 Street & Dickens Intersection Improvements71 Street & Dickens Intersection Improvements71 Street & Dickens Intersection Improvements71 Street & Dickens Intersection Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
NeNeNeNeed:ed:ed:ed:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $434,878$434,878$434,878$434,878
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority:Priority:Priority:Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 26Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 7777
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Alton Road ReconstructionAlton Road ReconstructionAlton Road ReconstructionAlton Road Reconstruction
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2008 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street
parking lanes, 14 ft shared-use sidewalks with landscaping. Intersection improvements
including signal phasing/timing and exclusive left-turn lanes.TSM recommendations for 5th
Street Flyover to include signage & marking improvements, replacing barrier walls and railings,
increase clear width to 17 Ft and at-grade bus-only EB left-turn bay on 5th St and Alton Rd.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Reconstruction, traffic operation improvements, pedestrian safety improvements and
landscaping on Alton Road between 5 Street to Michigan Avenue.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $11,951,118.54$11,951,118.54$11,951,118.54$11,951,118.54
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 27Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 8888
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Alton Road ReconstructionAlton Road ReconstructionAlton Road ReconstructionAlton Road Reconstruction
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2008 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Per FDOT PD&E Study - 4 lanes with center left-turn lane with periodic median islands, on-street
parking lanes, 14 ft shared-use sidewalks with landscaping. (Dade Blvd - Michigan Ave)
Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks. (Michigan Ave - 41 St)
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Reconstruction, traffic operation improvements, pedestrian safety improvements and
landscaping on Alton Road between Michigan Avenue to 41 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $13,743,598.31$13,743,598.31$13,743,598.31$13,743,598.31
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 28Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 9999
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: La Gorce Drive StudiesLa Gorce Drive StudiesLa Gorce Drive StudiesLa Gorce Drive Studies
Project CategProject CategProject CategProject Category: ory: ory: ory: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2008 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Further studies to determine increased levels of traffic calming such as wider center islands,
chokers, speed tables, etc. Improve channelization at 51 St.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Further studies to increase levels of traffic calming on La Groce Drive from 51 Street to
63 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $500,000$500,000$500,000$500,000
PlannPlannPlannPlanning: ing: ing: ing:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 29Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 10101010
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Pine Tree Drive ImprovementsPine Tree Drive ImprovementsPine Tree Drive ImprovementsPine Tree Drive Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2008 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Further studies to determine increased levels of traffic calming such as wider center islands,
chokers, speed tables, etc. Improve channelization at 51 St.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Improve traffic safety on Pine Tree Drive from 51 Street to 63 Street and channelization
at 51 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $500,000$500,000$500,000$500,000
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 30ProjectProjectProjectProject Number: Number: Number: Number: 11111111
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Collins Avenue ImprovementsCollins Avenue ImprovementsCollins Avenue ImprovementsCollins Avenue Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2015 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Synchronize traffic signals & signal phasing/timing improvements and provide for pedestrian
safety through better markings, signages and wider sidewalks as feasible. Requires further
detailed analyses.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Synchronize traffic signals, including phase and timing improvement and pedestrian
safety improvements on Collins Avenue from 5 Street to 11 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $28,800$28,800$28,800$28,800
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 31Project NuProject NuProject NuProject Number: mber: mber: mber: 12121212
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: West Avenue ImprovementsWest Avenue ImprovementsWest Avenue ImprovementsWest Avenue Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2015 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Refer to recent study by the City.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Traffic operation improvements, bike lanes and pedestrian safety improvements on West
Avenue from 5 Street to Dade Boulevard.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
TTTTime Frame:ime Frame:ime Frame:ime Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 32Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 13131313
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Alton Road sidewalk ImprovementsAlton Road sidewalk ImprovementsAlton Road sidewalk ImprovementsAlton Road sidewalk Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Transportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation ElementTransportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2015 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
In order to attract more multi-modal use of roadway segment, provide for wider shared-use
sidewalks.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Provide for wider shared-use sidewalks on Alton Road from 41 Street to 63 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $180,000$180,000$180,000$180,000
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 33Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 14141414
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: 15 & 16 Street one15 & 16 Street one15 & 16 Street one15 & 16 Street one----way pair Feasibility Study/TDMway pair Feasibility Study/TDMway pair Feasibility Study/TDMway pair Feasibility Study/TDM
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: TransportTransportTransportTransportation Elementation Elementation Elementation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2015 and through to the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Convert 15 St and 16 St as one way pairs from Alton Rd to Washington Ave. LOS on 15 St will
improve from F to D. Will require further detailed traffic operations and capacity/LOS analyses.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
15 & 16 Street one-way pair Feasibility Study/TDM, part of the Alton Road/Washington
Avenue feasibility study, from West Avenue to Meridian Avenue.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: III III III III ---- LowLowLowLow
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 34Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 15151515
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: 10 & 11 Street one10 & 11 Street one10 & 11 Street one10 & 11 Street one----way pair Feasibility Study/TDMway pair Feasibility Study/TDMway pair Feasibility Study/TDMway pair Feasibility Study/TDM
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: TranTranTranTransportation Elementsportation Elementsportation Elementsportation Element
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Roadway segment is projected to be operating at a Peak-Hour Peak-Directional Level-of-
Service of E or F by the year 2030.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Monitor traffic conditions to determine feasibility of converting 11 St and 10 Street into one way
pairs from Alton Rd to Washington Ave in the future.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
10 & 11 Street one-way pair Feasibility Study/TDM, part of the Alton Road/Washington
Avenue feasibility study, from Meridian Avenue to Ocean Drive.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $250,000$250,000$250,000$250,000
PlanPlanPlanPlanning: ning: ning: ning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: III III III III ---- LowLowLowLow
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 35Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 1A1A1A1A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Comprehensive Intermodal Center Feasibility StudyComprehensive Intermodal Center Feasibility StudyComprehensive Intermodal Center Feasibility StudyComprehensive Intermodal Center Feasibility Study
ProjectProjectProjectProject
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
This project is designed to improve the level of service along the major roadways within the
study area by providing improved transit service and increasing options for modes of
transportation other than a personal vehicle. Its purpose is to explore potential locations on
both the mainland and beaches.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The coastal communities have a strong need for an improved sub-regional transit system that
would be made up of transit centers along the causeway termini, on the beaches and at the
mainland with frequent east/west bus service linking the beaches to a strong north/south
regional spine when the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor. The need for increased capacity on the
causeways was expressed, especially in the north beach communities and the need was
reinforced by the
findings from the origin/destination study which documented a high volume of commuters
traveling south along the beach to utilize the Julia Tuttle causeway. The Tuttle causeway has the
greatest vehicle capacity and most direct access to a wide regional distribution network of
highways. Enhancing capacities on causeways other than the Julia Tuttle would enhance traffic
flow.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This project will be to examine development of intermodal centers adjacent to each end
of each of the causeways. The exact locations will have to be further studied and
identified. The intermodal facilities will serve all of the beach communities as transfer
stations and transit loading areas for transit users that are making regional commutes to
and from the beach. A conceptual intermodal center and appropriate programming
would be developed. Tentative sites would be examined for their ability to
accommodate the programming, their impact on the adjacent land uses and
neighborhoods, their and proximity to transit uses. Potential sites would also be
evaluated to determine the size of facility that would
be necessary (Major or minor) at that location. It is anticipated that these would provide
a direct link to any proposed transit in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor, on the
mainland. As well as provide a link to local Circulator Systems.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $120,000$120,000$120,000$120,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 36Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 17A17A17A17A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Coastal Communities Transit Development PlanCoastal Communities Transit Development PlanCoastal Communities Transit Development PlanCoastal Communities Transit Development Plan
PPPProject Category: roject Category: roject Category: roject Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Cities within the Coastal Communities have been very progressive in its transportation planning
over the years. The next step is to develop a Transit Development Plan specifically related to
operations in the Coastal Communities and how the system link with the peripheral
communities. This report can be used as a basis for such a plan.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The Coastal Communities are experiencing increasing roadway congestion. To date most of the
improvements specified by any city has been roadway oriented. Due to the nature of the
transportation industry, small municipalities are rarely capable of operating or funding their own
transit systems. This responsibility is generally regional. The need exists to develop a specific
plan, in coordination with Miami Dade Transit, who will be required to operate the system. The
plan should included methods of local funding and local plan oversight.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
A transit development plan needs to address ::
Routes
Connections
Headways
Operations
Maintenance
This must be developed in very close coordination with Miami Dade Transit. It is
anticipated that an operating agreement in the form of an interlocal agreement will
need to be developed to detail how the plan will be implemented. There is a probability
that the plan will call for more intensive service that what is currently called for in the
MDT plan for the area. In this event, the Coastal Communities need to be prepared to
assist in the implementation through the contribution of funds for such a purpose.
Administrative oversight of the program implementation will also be required by the
communities.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $40,000$40,000$40,000$40,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 37Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 11A11A11A11A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Reexamine Bus Stop Location on Pinetree DriveReexamine Bus Stop Location on Pinetree DriveReexamine Bus Stop Location on Pinetree DriveReexamine Bus Stop Location on Pinetree Drive
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Because bus stop locations on Pinetree drive are difficult to access, it is believed that relocation
to a more convenient location would provide greater safety and ease of use.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Many are concerned that the physical locations of the bus stops on this street create a safety
concern that must be mitigated.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Physical evaluation of each bus stop location performed, and recommendations for
more effective placement. This will lead to the design and replacement of stops.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $10,000$10,000$10,000$10,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: $30,000$30,000$30,000$30,000
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: $300,000$300,000$300,000$300,000
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HigHigHigHighhhh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 38Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 2C2C2C2C
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Collins Avenue Corridor StudyCollins Avenue Corridor StudyCollins Avenue Corridor StudyCollins Avenue Corridor Study
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
This project will study ways to provide increased capacity on Collins Ave while identifying ways
to calm traffic in residential areas and limit the traffic backups caused by commercial delivery
trucks.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Residents in the neighborhoods that Collins Ave passes through have identified speeding as a
major issue impacting the livability of their neighborhood. Other problems include concerns
over delivery trucks which often impede the flow of traffic reducing the capacity. There is a need
to regulate these activities to improve traffic flow.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
A comprehensive multi-modal transportation study of the Collins Ave corridor will
provide analysis of the feasibility of various strategies to improve the livability of
neighborhoods on this roadway without increasing the right-of-way. The study will look
at signal progression analysis, intersection operational analysis, transit opportunities
analysis, pedestrian and bicycle amenities, intermodal center locations, aesthetics and
signage. This project will also focus on improving vehicle flow by regulating commercial
deliveries to businesses, especially during peak traffic periods and analyze ways to
provide a more balanced mix between vehicles and pedestrians. Enforcing parking and
loading zone hours of operation will be critical to improving flow.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $80,000$80,000$80,000$80,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
TimeTimeTimeTime Frame:Frame:Frame:Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 39Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 1CA1CA1CA1CA
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Causeway and East/West Flow EnhancementsCauseway and East/West Flow EnhancementsCauseway and East/West Flow EnhancementsCauseway and East/West Flow Enhancements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
This project will study ways to provide increased capacity on each of the causeways focusing on
improving regional mobility for the communities on the barrier islands.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The northern causeways and their respective east/west connections to I-95, especially Ives Dairy
Road, NE 163rd Street and NE 125th Street are presently operating at a poor level of service
during peak traffic periods. The data collected during the origin and destination study
supported the need for improved level of service on these roads. The north/south roadways are
also experiencing a greater volume of vehicles due to the fact that the causeways with the
greatest capacity and most direct connections to I-95 are in the southern coastal communities.
It is expected that the performance of these roads will further deteriorate with the current rate of
development in NE Miami-Dade County.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
An analysis of the major east/west corridors is required to determine appropriate
operational improvements. A variety of methods by which to gain additional physical
capacity should be examined, including the use of shoulder lanes, reversible lanes or
even Intelligent Transportation Systems, such as the feasibility of utilizing electronic
message boards to inform commuters of traffic situations in advance will be studied.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $60,000$60,000$60,000$60,000
DesigDesigDesigDesign:n:n:n: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 40Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 3CA3CA3CA3CA
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: OneOneOneOne----way Residential Streets (South Beach)way Residential Streets (South Beach)way Residential Streets (South Beach)way Residential Streets (South Beach)
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
This study is designed to test the traffic impact of converting two way streets into one-way streets
in certain residential districts, particularly in South Beach. The potential may occur to increase
the number of on-street parking spaces, by implementing angled parking, as opposed to
parallel parking.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Parking in the Flamingo Neighborhood in South Beach, as in other residential areas of Miami
Beach, is at a premium. Any increase in the number of spaces would provide a relief to the
people who live in the area. By converting parallel parking to angled parking, a significant
increase in parking could be attained. This could be done creating one-way roadways, and
converting existing travel lanes to parking lanes.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
The scope of services for this project should focus on examining the Flamingo
Neighborhood, by looking at right of way widths, travel lane widths, parking lane widths
and number of parking spaces. On roadways where rights of way may accommodate
the conceptual reconfiguration of parking will be examined. The number of additional
spaces will be assessed. A traffic impact analysis will determine the impact to the
roadway network of converting these roadways from two-way to one-way.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 41Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 6CA6CA6CA6CA
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Examine Locations for OnExamine Locations for OnExamine Locations for OnExamine Locations for On----Demand Pedestrian SignalDemand Pedestrian SignalDemand Pedestrian SignalDemand Pedestrian Signal PhasesPhasesPhasesPhases
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this effort is to identify intersections where it may be appropriate to eliminate the
regular pedestrian phase of the traffic signal, making it on-demand instead of built into the
phasing. This would free time in the regular cycle for the movement of automobiles.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Many in the community have focused on eliminating bottlenecks in the system and assuring the
efficiency of movement for vehicles and pedestrians. One method of doing this is to convert the
pedestrian phase of a traffic signal from built-in, to on-demand. This is most appropriate where
pedestrian activity is sporadic. When present, pedestrians would simply push the pedestrian
crossing button on street pole. During the next phase they would be provided time to cross. If
not present, that pedestrian crossing time would be allocated to vehicular movement.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This study will take pedestrian counts at a dozen key intersections. Locations where
pedestrian traffic is minimal, sporadic, and contain pedestrian crossing phases, will be
converted to on-demand or pedestrian actuated signals. The impact of this conversion
will be assessed.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $30,000$30,000$30,000$30,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 42Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 7CA7CA7CA7CA
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: On Street Parking ManagementOn Street Parking ManagementOn Street Parking ManagementOn Street Parking Management
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities Coastal Communities Coastal Communities Coastal Communities (Capacity)(Capacity)(Capacity)(Capacity)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
This project will study ways to provide increased capacity through the management of on-street
parking.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Roadway capacity is at a premium. In many locations additional capacity could be attained,
particularly in the peak commuting hours through the management of on street parking. If
parking were prohibited during peak commuting hours on streets which are heavily used for
commuters, traffic flow would be enhanced.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This study will determine the location of major transportation conduits, such as Collins
Avenue, Harding Avenue, Alton Road, Indian Creek Boulevard, Sunny Isles Boulevard
Kane Concourse and Normandy Drive and 71st Street. It will identify the presence of
parking lanes, and examine any restrictions on parking. An examination of parking
utilization will be undertaken. Potential down stream bottlenecks and other physical
impediments to traffic flow will be identified. Examples of successful utilization of this in
various cities will be provided. Recommendations as to the parameters of
implementation areas will be made.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $35,000$35,000$35,000$35,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 43Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 9CA9CA9CA9CA
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: 63rd Street Travel Patterns63rd Street Travel Patterns63rd Street Travel Patterns63rd Street Travel Patterns
Project CategorProject CategorProject CategorProject Category: y: y: y: Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)Coastal Communities (Capacity)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to examine the travel patterns that result after the 63rd Street
flyover construction is completed to determine if any efficiency can be gained by re routing.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Maintenance of traffic plans has re-routed vehicles during this construction. Many in the area
feel that the existing pattern during the construction may relieve congestion if it is maintained.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
6 months after construction is completed the area should be analyzed. Traffic volumes
on each road and turning movement counts at major intersection can be taken. Three
alternatives for traffic movement will be analyzed in by using a micro-simulation tool.
After public involvement with the community a preferred alternative shall be selected.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $60,000$60,000$60,000$60,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: I I I I ---- HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 44Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 9A9A9A9A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Trans it Bus PTrans it Bus PTrans it Bus PTrans it Bus Priorityriorityriorityriority
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (AlteCoastal Communities (AlteCoastal Communities (AlteCoastal Communities (Alternative Mode)rnative Mode)rnative Mode)rnative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
An aspect of the attractiveness of transit is its ability to be competitive with the private
automobile. Several factors go into the assessment of competitiveness. This seeks to examine
methods of moving buses through traffic with priority over the private vehicle.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Speed of service is needed to provide a competitive advantage over other modes and attract
choice riders to the system.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Technologies which could be used to move buses through the system faster than private
vehicles will be explored. These include: special use lanes, bus pullouts, queue jumpers,
signal prioritization, GPS, Medina/Shoulder Transitway and remote vehicle tracking and
scheduling. The state of these technologies will be examined, as will examples of
systems that are currently using them. Each will be evaluated as to their effectiveness
and ease of implementation. For physical improvements to the system, actual locations
will be identified and tested for their ability to accommodate the use.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $55,000$55,000$55,000$55,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 45Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 13A13A13A13A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Enhance Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit LinkagesEnhance Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit LinkagesEnhance Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit LinkagesEnhance Bicycle/Pedestrian/Transit Linkages
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative MoCoastal Communities (Alternative MoCoastal Communities (Alternative MoCoastal Communities (Alternative Mode)de)de)de)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to assure that the transportation network is fully integrated, linking
automobile, roadway, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit uses.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The study area is highly dense, encouraging multiple modes of transportation in order to
adequately move. The need to integrate these systems through appropriate linkages is
paramount to assuring multimodal mobility.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Review all previous plans including bikeway and pedestrian plans, roadway plans, plans
for intermodal centers. Assure that the pedestrian and bicycle amenities are provided at
key intermodal locations, traffic generators and transit stations. Inventory these facilities,
assess the level of service for these amenities using FDOT Q/LOS criteria, recommend
necessary improvements and cost of improvements.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $45,000$45,000$45,000$45,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 46Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 4C4C4C4C
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Reexamine Collins / Harding One Way PairReexamine Collins / Harding One Way PairReexamine Collins / Harding One Way PairReexamine Collins / Harding One Way Pair
Project Project Project Project Category: Category: Category: Category: Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)Coastal Communities (Corridor Enhancements)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
In an effort to further diversify the land use mix in the central zone of the study area, the
utilization of the parking lots between Collins Avenue and Harding Avenue in Miami Beach
between 77th Street and 87th Street as an economic development area can be examined. The
removal of the one way pair and reinstatement of both roads as two way facilities should be
examined as it would better interact with this type of development.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Residents in the neighborhoods that Collins Avenue and Harding Avenue pass through have
identified speeding as a major issue impacting the livability of their neighborhood. Pedestrian
access, as well as residential or commercial development in the area may be better
accommodated if the traffic patterns were reformed.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This analysis would review the conceptual design for the development in the area.
It would evaluate the roadway network in its existing condition, develop three
alternatives to the existing condition and measure the impact of those alternatives on
the area transportation system out to 2030. A preferred alternative will be selected and
an implementation plan provided.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $80,000$80,000$80,000$80,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
TimeTimeTimeTime Frame:Frame:Frame:Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 47Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 1P1P1P1P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Liaison with South Florida Regional Commuter ServicesLiaison with South Florida Regional Commuter ServicesLiaison with South Florida Regional Commuter ServicesLiaison with South Florida Regional Commuter Services
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
To coordinate and manage transportation in the coastal communities, this position would act as
a liaison between the cities, the citizens, the development community, local employers, and
other local, county and state transportation authorities. The primary focus would be to manage
concurrency, oversee developer activity, and interface with businesses to implement
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The data suggest that with very broad peak hours that the transportation system is maturing,
and is ready for high quality transit and TDM. There is little latent capacity, as people are using
the system throughout the day. In addition there are significant residential and business areas,
and areas of concentration of the commuting public. This effort would further encourage activity
that is beginning to occur naturally. Heightened attention to this may change driver behavior
resulting in less vehicular traffic at particular times of the day, further spreading volumes.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This position would coordinate Transportation Demand Management strategies with
local employers, act as a liaison, with MDCPW, MDT, MPO, and FDOT, in an attempt
to develop and implement projects as a result of this report. This could be an additional
position, or one which could be added to an existing position.
CoCoCoCost:st:st:st:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 –––– 40,000 per year, depending on formalized description of 40,000 per year, depending on formalized description of 40,000 per year, depending on formalized description of 40,000 per year, depending on formalized description of
servicesservicesservicesservices
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 48Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 18A18A18A18A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Intercept Parking Linked with ShuttlesIntercept Parking Linked with ShuttlesIntercept Parking Linked with ShuttlesIntercept Parking Linked with Shuttles
PrPrPrProject Category: oject Category: oject Category: oject Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this project has come from the acknowledgement that a higher level of transit
service is needed, and that this needs to be actively sought. Additionally a method to do this is
to provide ample space for automobile parking on the periphery of the most densely populated
economically diverse areas so that drivers have an option of leaving their vehicles outside of
urban areas. The goal of increasing transit ridership or achieving a more balanced modal split
can be accomplished by providing specialized transit services.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The need here is to provide an alternative to having to enter Miami Beach with an automobile.
Peripheral or intercept parking facilities serviced by transit, may assist in reducing the number of
cars entering the most congested areas. As particular areas intensify, and traffic congestion
worsens, the lack of alternative modes creates a need to continue to cater to automobile users.
This strategy becomes impractical as congestion reaches a critical mass, and system failure is
reached. An example of system failure can be seen with the Miami Beach Boat Show. Limited
roadway capacity makes it difficult to enter the South Beach area. Finite parking leaves vehicles
that have entered with no alternatives, other than to search indefinitely for parking, or exit the
area for remote lots, and take specially provided transit in to the area. The congestion is a
deterrent. A logical next step will be to assure that the buses can move as fast or faster, or are
more comfortable than the automobile, to provide further incentive.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
In conjunction with the identification of intermodal locations, this effort would focus on
locating facilities at the edges or outside the community. It will be necessary to schedule
regularly scheduled transit service from these locations to major generators in various
districts.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: In conjunction with Intermodal Feasibility StudyIn conjunction with Intermodal Feasibility StudyIn conjunction with Intermodal Feasibility StudyIn conjunction with Intermodal Feasibility Study
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time FrTime FrTime FrTime Frame:ame:ame:ame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 49Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 4P4P4P4P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Transportation Systems Management (TSM)Transportation Systems Management (TSM)Transportation Systems Management (TSM)Transportation Systems Management (TSM)
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Transportation Demand Management programs will provide incentives, and market
management to affect travel behavior to shift to non-motorized and/or higher occupancy
modes in order to reduce congestion on the roadways in the coastal communities.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
There is significant traffic congestion in the coastal communities generally between 8:00 am
and 8:00 pm. The utilization of techniques like van pools, HOV lanes, telecommuting and
flexible work schedules would free capacity at the most critical times of the day.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Transportation Demand Management strategies would utilize the services offered by the
South Florida Commuter Services by encouraging businesses to take advantage of the
programs.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 50Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 5555PPPP
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Police Enforcement to Enhance Traffic FlowPolice Enforcement to Enhance Traffic FlowPolice Enforcement to Enhance Traffic FlowPolice Enforcement to Enhance Traffic Flow
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this is to provide more strict and consistent enforcement of parking, and delivery
regulations on the major corridors within the study area.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Many corridors and streets are besieged by a variety of prohibited activities, such as rush hour
delivers or illegal parking. This policy would enforce existing regulations to remove unwarranted
obstacles from the roadway network, thereby enhancing traffic flow.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Implementation of this policy is a commitment on keeping vehicles from blocking
thoroughfares at prohibited times.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
PrioPrioPrioPriority: rity: rity: rity: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 51Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 6P6P6P6P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Examine Parking Impact FeesExamine Parking Impact FeesExamine Parking Impact FeesExamine Parking Impact Fees
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this is to examine the feasibility of instituting parking impact fees to pay for
various transportation improvements.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Projects to be implemented in the study area, need to be part of a financially feasible capital
improvements element, as a result of SB 360, the 1995 growth management legislation.
Sources of funding may be needed to assure that the transportation infrastructure necessary to
continue the economic development of the Coastal Communities.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Evaluate the need and desire for the various participating communities to implement
parking impact fees. A draft fee structure should be developed.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $35,000$35,000$35,000$35,000
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 52Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 7P7P7P7P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: ReReReRe----Examine Residential Parking RequirementsExamine Residential Parking RequirementsExamine Residential Parking RequirementsExamine Residential Parking Requirements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this is to evaluate the residential parking requirements and make
recommendations to modify them if necessary.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Many communities can provide incentives for the use of alternative modes by limiting the
number of parking spaces available in certain area. Urban areas tend to have less space
available for residential parking in large part because not as many cars are needed. North
Beach residents have suggest re-examining the standard in an effort to lower the number of
spaces required by code.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This study will undertake a demographic analysis to measure the number of vehicles per
household in the North Beach area. A comparison will be made with other areas in the
coastal communities, and across the nation. An assessment of the number of parking
spaces in the North Beach area per household will be made. A determination of
whether the supply meets the demand will be made. The impacts of a policy change will
be examined and any prudent changes recommended.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $40,0$40,0$40,0$40,000000000
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 53Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 10P10P10P10P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Motorized Personal Mobility Devices PoliciesMotorized Personal Mobility Devices PoliciesMotorized Personal Mobility Devices PoliciesMotorized Personal Mobility Devices Policies
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to provide incentives for the use of alternative modes of
transportation, like scooters, mopeds and segways.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
With automobile levels of service deteriorating, the use of scooters for local transportation
could take large numbers of automobiles off of the roads.
DescripDescripDescripDescription: tion: tion: tion:
This effort would examine policies for alternative modes of transportation like, bicycles,
scooters or segways. The examination should look at how other communities manage
their use.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $5,000$5,000$5,000$5,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time FrTime FrTime FrTime Frame:ame:ame:ame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 54Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 11P11P11P11P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Shared Cars/Zip CarsShared Cars/Zip CarsShared Cars/Zip CarsShared Cars/Zip Cars
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The use of shared cars will provide reliable and convenient access to on-demand
transportation, complementing other means of mobility.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
The Coastal Communities area, is one of the most densely populated, mix use areas in the
state. As this master plan attempts to identify to more balance the modal split by providing
alternatives, this program provides an alternative that will use the automobile. By having use of
an automobile in a reliable and confining manner, the necessity of ownership is minimized. The
Costal Communities area is ripe for this type of alterative, which exists in no less than nine
locations across the nation.
Car sharing is a system where a fleet of cars (or other vehicles) is jointly-owned by the users in
distinction from car rental or cars in private ownership. The fleet is made available for use by
members of the car share group in a wide variety of ways. The costs and troubles of vehicle
purchase, ownership and maintenance are transferred to a central organizer. The concept has
been around in various forms for more than half a century, but it is only in the last decade that it
has begun to gather force as a viable alternative to car ownership. Today there are more than
six hundred cities in the world where people can car share. In the larger services that are
increasingly coming into existence, participants are typically city-dwellers whose transportation
needs are largely met by public transit, walking, or cycling. Car sharing is not only a way for
individuals or groups to meet their specific mobility requirements, but it is also a key strategy in
this master plan which combines Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies and
measures for containing, channeling and limiting private car traffic in cities, with support of a
“bouquet” of alternative transportation arrangements. These include utility cycling, walking,
public space improvement, electronic substitutes for travel (such as telework, telecommuting or
e-work) and a variety of shared and public transport strategies. Car sharing permits people to
give up their cars and in the process make fuller use of these other ways of getting around in
cities.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Research various car sharing approaches and select one that best fits the coastal
communities. Implement a program quickly.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $5,000$5,000$5,000$5,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 5 to 10 5 to 10 5 to 10 YearsYearsYearsYears
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 55Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 12P12P12P12P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Driver Behavior CampaignDriver Behavior CampaignDriver Behavior CampaignDriver Behavior Campaign
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Many in the community desire to remind drivers of their responsibilities and to better adhere to
the rules of the road and common courtesy.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
As more drivers compete for less space, poor driving is noticed more, and becomes more
dangerous. Along with enforcement programs, a driver behavior campaign, implemented
through various programs should be undertaken. Issues like a “don’t block the box” signage or
campaign to keep drivers from entering intersections without ample space to fully clear the
intersections, would aid in driver safety, and reduce gridlock.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
This project would research similar programs implemented by cities across the country.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $5,000$5,000$5,000$5,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 56Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 13P13P13P13P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Reassignment of Concurrency Fees to TransitReassignment of Concurrency Fees to TransitReassignment of Concurrency Fees to TransitReassignment of Concurrency Fees to Transit
ProProProProject Category: ject Category: ject Category: ject Category: Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)Coastal Communities (Policy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this is to more adequately fund the planning, design and development of
alternative modes of transportation.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
There is an imbalance in the use of the mobility system, heavily skewed to automobile use.
While completely appropriate up to this time, it is important that as the system reaches a critical
mass of congestion, that alternatives be provided for those inclined for whatever reason, (cost,
convenience, amenities) to utilize transit. Currently Miami Beach contributes fees derived from
concurrency to roadway, elements. There are finite gains to be made from the enhancement of
physical roadway capacity. Further focusing projects in this manner will have limited positive
impact on the transportation system. A shift to the addition of transit capacity will ultimately be
more impactful.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Shift the utilization of concurrency fees paid by the development community to the
development of transit capacity projects, instead of roadway capacity projects.
Measurement of person trips instead of vehicle trips can show how adequate mitigation
is begin provided.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: NANANANA
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 57 Project NumProject NumProject NumProject Number: ber: ber: ber: 4A4A4A4A
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Cross Bay Rail Transit Alternatives AnalysisCross Bay Rail Transit Alternatives AnalysisCross Bay Rail Transit Alternatives AnalysisCross Bay Rail Transit Alternatives Analysis
ProjectProjectProjectProject
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
This project would study routes and modes available to provide a connection to the coastal
communities as part existing and future rail system, linking the barrier island communities with
the airport, the Port of Miami, Downtown Miami and beyond. This project is designed to
improve the level of service along the major roadways within the study area by providing
improved transit service.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
As one of the densest areas of the County and State, the coastal communities have a strong
need for an improved sub-regional transit system that would be made up frequent east/west
service to distribute traffic from the densest part of the area to. This was reinforced by the results
of the origin and destination study, which proved that the bulk of the trip making was using the
causeways closest to the commuter’s beach origin or destination to enter or exit the study area.
The origin/destination study documented a high volume of commuters traveling north and south
along the beach to utilize the Julia Tuttle Causeway. The Tuttle Causeway has the greatest
capacity and most direct access to a wide regional distribution network of highways.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
The Study would examine the most appropriate causeway and mode for the east/ west
mass transit connection. Logical connection points would be the Mac Arthur Causeway,
or the Julia Tuttle Causeway which connects at 41st Street, the study areas largest
employment center. All causeways should be throughout the study area should be
examined.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $1,500,000$1,500,000$1,500,000$1,500,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: III III III III ---- LowLowLowLow
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 58Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 2A2A2A2A
ProjProjProjProject Name:ect Name:ect Name:ect Name: Enhanced Bus MarketingEnhanced Bus MarketingEnhanced Bus MarketingEnhanced Bus Marketing
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Increase transit ridership by appealing to commuters that are either not aware of the transit
system or not comfortable using it. Providing excellent quality transit throughout the coastal
communities is essential to increasing options for modes of transportation other than a personal
vehicle, yet informing the public of the options is crucial to boosting ridership, particularly to
choice riders.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
It was expressed that the general public could be better informed of the availability of transit
options, services as well as existing routes and schedules. This will be integral to presenting to
the public a bus transit system that is attractive to choice users.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Develop ways to increase opportunities for the general public to have access to transit
information including bus and rail line routes, schedules and facilities. In addition
strategies would be developed to aggressively market transit service to choice riders.
Target demographics, geographies and specific routes and modes will be selected.
Concepts and designs for marketing materials would be developed. The cost to
implement various programs including on site mapping, print, radio, television and
internet services would be estimated. This is best developed concurrently with any route
consolidation.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $75,000$75,000$75,000$75,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: III III III III ---- LowLowLowLow
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 59Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 3A3A3A3A
ProjeProjeProjeProject Name:ct Name:ct Name:ct Name: Enhanced Bus AmenitiesEnhanced Bus AmenitiesEnhanced Bus AmenitiesEnhanced Bus Amenities
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)Coastal Communities (Alternative Mode)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to provide amenities on transit buses, stops and stations that
would serve attractive to choice riders.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
It is believed that improving the amenities of the transit infrastructure would help to encourage
more commuters to use transit, thereby contributing to overall congestion relief within the area
through a more balanced modal split. Ideas expressed included smaller buses on shorter routs.
More shelters at stops of adequate design, with additional amenities, such as real time route
performance and bus location information, as well as adequate bicycle and pedestrian
amenities. On specialized routes buses stops and stations can be developed to mimic rail
amenities, with elevated platforms, pre-paid fares, and multiple no-step-up bus entrances.
Actual buses may have alternative bodies, of which examples replicate street cars, trolleys, or
futuristic rail vehicles. Interior to the buses, amenities may include: internet access, electrical
outlets, televisions, high back over the road coach type seats, and global positioning systems.
Routes themselves would be designed to the same characteristics as light rail street car systems,
without the expense of the rail and overhead wiring systems. The roadway itself can be fit with
bus pullouts, queue jumper lanes and signal prioritization. Stations and stops should be linked
with adequate sidewalks, and noticed by appropriate signage.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Initially this would examine state of the art technologies and look at examples of similar
systems and the potential within the MDT system. The analysis would examine what
specific amenities would be appropriate for buses, stops, stations and routes. A strategy
for the development of a pilot project should be developed, along with three potential
routs as well as the capital, operating and maintenance costs of such an effort for each.
Evaluation criteria should be set up to measure the success of the system.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $75,000$75,000$75,000$75,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: III III III III ---- LowLowLowLow
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 60Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 3P3P3P3P
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (PoliCoastal Communities (PoliCoastal Communities (PoliCoastal Communities (Policy)cy)cy)cy)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to utilize technology to improve the existing transportation network
and relieve traffic congestion.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
There is significant traffic congestion in the coastal communities that would benefit from
technological advances to monitor the flow of traffic in the area.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Intelligent Transportation Systems include such things as installing cameras to monitor
the flow of traffic and be able to view accidents in real time. This is beneficial because it
will speed up the time it takes emergency responders to arrive on the scene. Additional
systems could include electronic messages boards to inform drivers of congestion
before they reach it, to allow them to take alternate routes and avoid contributing to the
delays.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years10 to 20 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: III III III III ---- LowLowLowLow
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 61Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: T7T7T7T7
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: North Beach LocalNorth Beach LocalNorth Beach LocalNorth Beach Local
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Provide local transit circulation in the North Beach Area
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Lack of transit routes circulation in North Beach
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Routes Extensions and Adjustments
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: NANANANA
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: ????
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: ????
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 62Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: T8T8T8T8
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Middle Beach CirculatorMiddle Beach CirculatorMiddle Beach CirculatorMiddle Beach Circulator
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Provide local transit circulation in the Middle Beach area
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Lack of transit circulation in the area.
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Reconfigured from Routes R & K
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: NANANANA
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: ????
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: ????
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 63Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: T12, (TS)T12, (TS)T12, (TS)T12, (TS)
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Develop Transfer StationsDevelop Transfer StationsDevelop Transfer StationsDevelop Transfer Stations
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)Coastal Communities (Transit)
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Provide connectivity between various transit routes circulating through Miami Beach.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Lack of formal stations to use a comfortable transfer facilities between routes. Would create
synergy between land use and transit, enhancing desire to use transit.
Description:Description:Description:Description:
Off-Street, Bus Bays, Shelters, ITS, Pre Payment, Retail & Mix-Use Components
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: NANANANA
Design:Design:Design:Design: NANANANA
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: NANANANA
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: ????
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: ????
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 64Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: A1A1A1A1
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: South, Middle, and North Beach Neighborhood BikewaySouth, Middle, and North Beach Neighborhood BikewaySouth, Middle, and North Beach Neighborhood BikewaySouth, Middle, and North Beach Neighborhood Bikewayssss
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Atlantic Greenway NetworkAtlantic Greenway NetworkAtlantic Greenway NetworkAtlantic Greenway Network
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Bikeways to be constructed by Florida Department of Transportation, Miami-Dade
County or Miami Beach Public works or Miami Beach CIP Department.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: II II II II ---- MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 65Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: A2A2A2A2
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Identified Needs within the Ped & Bike NetworkIdentified Needs within the Ped & Bike NetworkIdentified Needs within the Ped & Bike NetworkIdentified Needs within the Ped & Bike Network
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Atlantic Greenway NetworkAtlantic Greenway NetworkAtlantic Greenway NetworkAtlantic Greenway Network
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
DesDesDesDescription: cription: cription: cription:
Design and construction in order to correct system wide gaps.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning:
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: TBDTBDTBDTBD
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: ---- TBDTBDTBDTBD
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 66Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: 40404040
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: South Beach Transit FacilitiesSouth Beach Transit FacilitiesSouth Beach Transit FacilitiesSouth Beach Transit Facilities (Potamkin 5th Street & (Potamkin 5th Street & (Potamkin 5th Street & (Potamkin 5th Street & Alton; Vitri 5th Alton; Vitri 5th Alton; Vitri 5th Alton; Vitri 5th
Street and Alton and 23rd Street)Street and Alton and 23rd Street)Street and Alton and 23rd Street)Street and Alton and 23rd Street)
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Municipal Mobility PlanMunicipal Mobility PlanMunicipal Mobility PlanMunicipal Mobility Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
To enable transfer between transit routes in South Beach.
Need:Need:Need:Need:
To enable convenient movement of people between transit routes.
DescriptDescriptDescriptDescription: ion: ion: ion:
Neighborhood traffic calming and street improvements throughout North Beach.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost: $4,900,000$4,900,000$4,900,000$4,900,000
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $10,000$10,000$10,000$10,000
Design:Design:Design:Design: $400,000$400,000$400,000$400,000
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction: 4,490,0004,490,0004,490,0004,490,000
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: ----
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: ----
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 67Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N1N1N1N1
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: North Beach TownNorth Beach TownNorth Beach TownNorth Beach Town Center Complete StreetsCenter Complete StreetsCenter Complete StreetsCenter Complete Streets
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: North Beach Town Center PlanNorth Beach Town Center PlanNorth Beach Town Center PlanNorth Beach Town Center Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Neighborhood traffic calming, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, feasibility and design
standards from Collins Avenue to Indian Creek and 69 Street to 72 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIII----HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 68Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N2N2N2N2
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: 69 Street Improvements69 Street Improvements69 Street Improvements69 Street Improvements
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: North Beach Town Center PlanNorth Beach Town Center PlanNorth Beach Town Center PlanNorth Beach Town Center Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Traffic study, redesign street, bicycle lanes and pedestrian improvements on 69 Street from
Ocean to Indian Creek Waterway.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $15,000$15,000$15,000$15,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIII----HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 69Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N3N3N3N3
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Harding Avenue Feasibility StudyHarding Avenue Feasibility StudyHarding Avenue Feasibility StudyHarding Avenue Feasibility Study
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Dev. ImpactsDev. ImpactsDev. ImpactsDev. Impacts
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Harding Avenue Feasibility study 2-way traffic flow from Indian Creek Drive to 69 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $10,000$10,000$10,000$10,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIII----HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 70Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N4N4N4N4
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Lenox Avenue Bicycle CorridorLenox Avenue Bicycle CorridorLenox Avenue Bicycle CorridorLenox Avenue Bicycle Corridor
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Alton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Installing bicycle lanes or bicycle boulevards on Lenox Avenue from 5 Street to Collins Canal.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIII----HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 71Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N5N5N5N5
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Alton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks Alton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks Alton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks Alton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks IIII
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Alton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Install pedestrian crosswalks with flashing signals at 9 Street and 13 Street; move existing
pedestrian signal from midblock to 14 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $50,00$50,00$50,00$50,000000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIII----HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 72Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N6N6N6N6
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Alton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks IIAlton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks IIAlton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks IIAlton Road Pedestrian Crosswalks II
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Alton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Pedestrian crosswalk safety improvements on Alton Road between 5 Street and 6 Street.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIIIIIII----MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 73Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N7N7N7N7
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Baywalk Crossing at MacArthur CausewayBaywalk Crossing at MacArthur CausewayBaywalk Crossing at MacArthur CausewayBaywalk Crossing at MacArthur Causeway
Project CategoProject CategoProject CategoProject Category: ry: ry: ry: Alton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Construct a pedestrian baywalk connection over or under the causeway bridge.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIIIIIII----MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 74Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N8N8N8N8
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: Sidewalk Enhancements for Bay AccessSidewalk Enhancements for Bay AccessSidewalk Enhancements for Bay AccessSidewalk Enhancements for Bay Access
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Alton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road PlanAlton Road Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Improve sidewalks, shade trees and crosswalks on 6, 10, 13, 14 and 16 Streets where there are
no planned GO Bond streetscape enhancements at 5 to 16 Street from Bay to Jefferson
Avenue.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
Construction:Construction:Construction:Construction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years5 to 10 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIIIIIII----MediumMediumMediumMedium
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
CORRADINO Page 75Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: Project Number: N9N9N9N9
Project Name:Project Name:Project Name:Project Name: OffOffOffOff----Street Bicycle ParStreet Bicycle ParStreet Bicycle ParStreet Bicycle Parkingkingkingking
Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: Project Category: North Beach Town Center & Alton Road PlanNorth Beach Town Center & Alton Road PlanNorth Beach Town Center & Alton Road PlanNorth Beach Town Center & Alton Road Plan
Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose:
Need:Need:Need:Need:
Description: Description: Description: Description:
Provide secure bicycle lockers, cages, shower facilities in City buildings and parking garages.
Cost:Cost:Cost:Cost:
Planning: Planning: Planning: Planning: $50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000
Design:Design:Design:Design:
ConsConsConsConstruction:truction:truction:truction:
Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame:Time Frame: 0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years0 to 5 Years
Priority: Priority: Priority: Priority: IIII----HighHighHighHigh
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 1CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 2CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 3CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 4CORRADINO
City of Miami Beach Transportation Element
Page 5CORRADINO