Loading...
20101117_Con_Detail_red_ocrMIAMIBEACH City Commission Meeting City Hall, Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor, 1700 Convention Center Drive November 17,2010 Mayor Matti Herrera Bower Vice-Mayor Michael G6ngora Commissioner Jorge Exposito Commissioner Jerry Libbin Commissioner Edward L. Tobin Commissioner Deede Weithorn Commissioner Jonah Wolfson City Manager Jorge M. Gonzalez City Attorney Jose Smith City Clerk Robert E. Parcher Visit us at www.miamibeachfl.gov for agendas and video "streaming" of City Commission Meetings. ATTENTION ALL LOBBYISTS Chapter 2, Article VII, Division 3 of the City Code of Miami Beach entitled "Lobbyists" requires the registration of all lobbyists with the City Clerk prior to engaging in any lobbying activity with the City Commission, any City Board or Committee, or any personnel as defined in the subject Code sections. Copies of the City Code sections on lobbyists laws are available in the City Clerk's Office. Questions regarding the provisions of the Ordinance should be directed to the Office of the City Attorney. Special note: In order to ensure adequate public consideration, if necessary, the Mayor and City Commission may move any agenda item to the alternate meeting date which will only be held if needed. In addition, the Mayor and City Commission may, at their discretion, adjourn the Commission Meeting without reaching all agenda items. Call to Order - 9:00 a.m. Inspirational Message, Pledge of Allegiance Requests for Additions, Withdrawals, and Deferrals The City Commission will recess for lunch at approximately 1 :00 p.m. Presentations and Awards PA Presentations and Awards Regular Aaenda R2 Competitive Bid Reports R5 Ordinances Consent Agenda R7 Resolutions C2 Competitive Bid Reports R9 New Business and Commission C4 Commission Committee Assignments R10 City Attorney Reports C6 Commission Committee Reports C7 Resolutions Reports and Informational Items We are committed to providing excellent public service and safety to all who live, work, and play in our vibrant, tropical, historic community. Consent Agenda, November 17,201 0 Presentations and Awards PA1 Presentation Of Sister Cities Plaque By Sister Cities Committee Chairman George Neary. (Page 3) (Requested by Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) (Deferred from October 27, 201 0) PA2 Certificate Of Appreciation To Be Presented To "Las Maraqueras," From The Little Havana Activities & Nutrition Centers Of Dade County. (Requested By Commissioner Michael Gongora) (Deferred from October 27, 201 0) PA3 Presentation On Ability Explosion By Disability Access Committee Chairman David New. (Requested By Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) PA4 Presentation On The Miami Beach S.M.I.L.E. Campaign By Community Relations Board Chairwoman Barbara Montero. (Requested By Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) CONSENT AGENDA Action: Moved: Seconded: Vote: C4 - Commission Committee Assislnments C4A Referral To The NeighborhoodsICommunity Affairs Committee - Discussion Regarding Requiring Miami Beach Restaurants To Post Scores Given By The Health Department. (Page 7) (Requested by Commissioner Deede Weithorn) C4B Referral To The NeighborhoodsICommunity Affairs Committee - Discussion Regarding The Relationship Between Organizations Applying For A Special Event Permit And Any Charitable Donations They Claim Will Be Generated By The Event, Including Tracking Actual Funds Donated. (Page 9) (Requested by Commissioner Deede Weithorn) C4C Referral To The Finance And Citywide Projects Committee - Discussion Regarding An Economic Impact Study And Options For Financing The Convention Center Renovation. (Page 11) (Requested by Commissioner Deede Weithorn) C4D Referral To The NeighborhoodsICommunity Affairs Committee - Discussion Concerning Overgrown Shrubs On Dunes And Beach Walks In Miami Beach. (Page 13) (Requested by Vice-Mayor Michael Gongora) Consent Agenda, November 17,201 0 C4 - Commission Committee Assinnments (Continued) C4E Referral To The Neighborhoods/Community Affairs Committee To Discuss Various Issues Related To Flagler Memorial (Monument) Island, Its Current And Future Operations And Management Options. (Page 15) (Parks & Recreation) C4F Referral To The Land Use And Development Committee - Discussion To Tighten The City Ordinance Involving Conditional Use Procedure For Second Hand Stores. (Page 17) (Requested by Vice-Mayor Michael Gongora) C4G Referral To The Land Use And Development Committee - Discussion Regarding A Request By Members Of The La Gorce Neighborhood To Return Sections Of Pine Tree And La Gorce Drives To Two-Way Lanes. (Page 19) (Requested By Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) C6 - Commission Committee Reports C6A Report Of The Capital lmprovement Projects Oversight Committee Meeting On September 13,2010: 1) Attendance. 2) Review And Acceptance Of Minutes. 3) Public Comments. 4) Commission Items: A) A Resolution Authorizing The Mayor And The City Clerk To Execute An Amendment To The Construction Services Agreement Between The City Of Miami Beach And M. Vila &Associates, Inc. (MVA), Dated June 3,2009, For The Construction Of The Historic City Of Miami Beach Right Of Way lnfrastructure Improvements Project, Neighborhood No. 9A, City Center; In The Negotiated Not To Exceed Amount Of $874,193.54, To Provide Construction Services For Right Of Way And lnfrastructure lmprovements Surrounding The New World Symphony Campus (NWS), Pennsylvania Avenue Garage, And Lincoln Park Projects Located Within The Adjacent City Center Commercial District Bid Package 9B Project Area; And Further Authorizing $87,419.35 As A Project Construction Contingency; With Funding Available From The Previously Appropriated Funds In The City Center Bid Package 9B RDA Construction Fund 365. B) A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Commission Of The City Of Miami Beach, Florida, Authorizing Additional Funding In The Amount Of $335,000 For Construction Contingency For Sanitary Sewer Main lmprovements Along Indian Creek Drive Between 26th And 41st Streets Construction Project; Funding For This Has Been Previously Appropriated From The Water And Sewer Gulf Breeze Fund 423.5) Requested Reports. 6) Discussion. 7) A) Old Business: Construction Update: Normandy Shores Neighborhood Improvement, B) Status Report: Venetian Island Neighborhood lmprovement Project, C) Status Report: Royal Palm Avenue And 44th Street Flooding Mitigation, D) Status Report: Palm & Hibiscus Island Undergrounding, E) Status Report: FlamingoNVest Avenue Neighborhood ROW, F) Status Report: South Pointe Phase II Neighborhood lmprovement Project, G) Status Report: South Pointe Phase 3,4And 5 Neighborhood lmprovement Project, H) Flamingo Park. (Page 23) iii Consent Agenda, November 17,2010 C6 - Commission Committee Reports (Continued) C6B Report Of The NeighborhoodsICommunity Affairs Committee Meeting On October 5,2010: I) Update Regarding The Status Of Efforts Made By The Administration To Encourage FDO T To Re-stripe The Lanes In The Mid Beach Area Along Alton Road. 2) Discussion Regarding An Ordinance Amending Chapter 46 Of The Miami Beach City Code, Entitled "Environment," By Amending Article Ill Thereof, Entitled "Litter," By Amending Section 46-92 To Clarify And Provide For Additional Prohibitions And Definitions For Litter With Regard To Leaf Blowers And Yard Maintenance Debris, And Clarifying Penalties For Certain Litter Violations; Providing For Repealer; Severability; Codification; And An Effective Date. 3) Discussion Regarding Stalled Construction Projects And Code Violations. 4) Consideration Of A Public Art Project By The Artist Tobias Rehberger To Be Commissioned For Placement In South Pointe Park, As Recommended By The Art In Public Places Committee. 5) Discussion Regarding The Renaming Of The Handball Courts At Flamingo Park To Richard Bower, Mayor Bower's Late Husband. (Page 29) C6C Report Of The Land Use And Development Committee Meeting On October 25,201 0: 1) Discussion Regarding A Request From The GLBT Committee To Allow Extended Hours Of Operation Of Certain Nightlife Venues During Four Major GLBT Tourism And Fundraising Weekends - Winter Party, White Party, Gay Pride And Aqua Girl. 2) Discussion On The Issuance OfA Request For Proposal (RFP) To Conduct A Study For The Development Of A City-Wide Transportation And Parking Plan. (Page 37) C6D Report Of The Finance And Citywide Projects Committee Meeting On October 14, 2010: I) Discussion Regarding An Amendment To A Resolution Regarding Assignment Of A Police Officer To The Police Athletic League (PAL). 2) Request For Approval To Issue A Request For Proposals (RFP) To Provide Parking CashierslAttendants And Supervisors For The City's Parking Garages; A) Criteria For Evaluations; B) Add A Labor Peace Clause. 3) Discussion Regarding A Proposed Lease Agreement With Miami Police Federal Credit Union, For Use Of 196 Square Feet Of Office Space Within The Miami Beach Police Department Building. 4) Discussion OfA Request From ECOMB, Inc., For An Amendment To Its Lease. 5) Discussion Of A Request From Miami Beach Film Society, Inc., For An Amendment To Its Lease Agreement. 6) Discussion Regarding The Miami Beach Festival Of The Arts And Potentially Contracting With A Professional Art Festival Company To Produce The Festival For The City. 7) Discussion Regarding Parity For Future Sidewalk Cafe Fee Increases. 8) Discussion Regarding Recent Billing Of Parking Impact Fees And The Possibility Of A Moratorium Due To Present Economic Market Conditions. 9) Discussion Of Lincoln RoadNVashington Collins Median. (Page 41) Consent Agenda, November 17,201 0 C7 - Resolutions C7A A Resolution Approving And Authorizing The City Manager Or His Designee To Submit Grant Applications To: 1) Miami-Dade County Homeless Trust For Funding From The HotellMotel And Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Program In An Amount Not To Exceed $40,000 For The City's Homeless Outreach Program; 2) Miami-Dade County Emergency Medical Services For Funding In An Amount Not To Exceed $20,000 For The City's Fire Rescue Initiatives; 3) Department Of Homeland Security For Emergency Food And Shelter Funds In An Amount Not To Exceed $20,000 For Food Vouchers And Emergency Assistance; And, 4) Approval Of A Local Agency Program Agreement With Florida Department Of Transportation (FDOT) For Funding Appropriated By The Florida Legislature In An Amount Not To Exceed $534,000; Appropriating The Above Funds, And Matching Funds As Necessary, If Approved And Accepted By The City, And Authorizing The Execution Of All Necessary Documents Related To These Applications. (Page 51) (Budget & Performance Improvement) C7B A Resolution Approving And Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute The Specifications For Precast Transformer Location Agreement With Florida Power And Light Company (FPL); And Further Granting FPL An Easement Over A Portion Of North Shore Bandshell Park For A Transformer And Underground Conduits That Will Serve The North Shore Bandshell Park And Facilities. (Page59) (Capital Improvement Projects) A Resolution Accepting The Recommendation Of The City Manager, Pursuant To Request For Proposals (RFP) No. 49-0911 0, For Benefit Consultant Services To Provide Assistance In Determining The City's Employee Benefits Program; And Authorizing The Administration To Enter Into Negotiations With The Top-Ranked Firm, Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc; And Should The Administration Not Be Able To Successfully Negotiate An Agreement With The Top-Ranked Firm, Authorizing The Administration To Negotiate With The Second-Ranked Firm, Bolton Partners, Inc.; And Further Authorizing The Mayor And Clerk To Execute An Agreement Upon Conclusion Of Successful Negotiations. (Page 69) (Human Resources Department) C7D A Resolution Consenting To And Confirming The Appointment Of Richard G. Lorber As The Acting Director Of The Planning Department For The City Of Miami Beach. (Page 95) (Human Resources) C7E A Resolution Consenting To And Confirming The Appointment Of Cynthia W. Curry As The Acting Director Of The Building Department For The City Of Miami Beach. (Page 101) (Human Resources) C7F A Resolution Approving A First Amendment To The Use Agreement With The School Board Of Miami-Dade County, Florida, Dated October 18, 2000, Providing Parking Spaces For North Beach Elementary Faculty And Staff; Said Amendment Reducing The Number Of Parking Spaces Available For Use By The Board To 30; Approving The Next Five (5) Year Extension Of The Agreement, Commencing On July 23,201 1, And Expiring On July 22,2016; Amending The Annual Rent Paid By The Board To The City From $4,320.00 To $3,150.00 (Or From $360.00 Per Month, To $262.50 Per Month); And Adding A New Article Entitled, "Legal Fees And Court Costs.'' (Page 1 13) (Parking Department) Consent Agenda, November 17,201 0 C7 - Resolutions (Continued) C7G A Resolution Approving A Preconstruction Application For Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption For A Single-Family Property At 2740 North Bay Road, And Authorizing The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office To Grant This Tax Exemption For The City's Portion Of Ad Valorem Properly Taxes For Qualifying Improvements To The Subject Property Following Substantial Completion Of The Project And Compliance With Certain Conditions. (Page 123) (Planning Department) C7H A Resolution Accepting The Recommendation Of The City Manager Pertaining To The Ranking Of Architectural And Engineering Firms, Pursuant To Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 42-0911 0, For Noise, Acoustic, And/or Sound Services, On An "As-Needed Basis", For Projects In Which The Basic Construction Cost Does Not Exceed $2 Million Or For Study Activities When The Fee For Such Professional Services Does Not Exceed $200,000; Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute Professional Services Agreements Upon Completion Of Successful Negotiations With The Six (6) Top-Ranked Proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc , Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering And Environmental Services, Inc, Edward Dugger +Associates, P.A., And Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc. (Page 149) (Planning Department) C71 A Resolution Setting A First Reading Public Hearing To Consider An Amendment To Chapter 142, "Zoning Districts And Regulations," Article II "District Regulations," Division 18 "PS Performance Standard District," Amending Section 142-693 "Permitted Uses," By Permitting Low Impact Car Washing And Auto Detailing In The CPS-2 District, When Completely Contained Within A Parking Garage Structure, And Not Visible From The Street Or Public Right-of-way. (Page 157) (Planning Department) C7J A Resolution Accepting The Recommendation Of The City Manager, Pursuant To Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 48-09/10, For The Project Development And Environment Study For The West Avenue Bridge Project; And Authorizing The Administration To Enter Into Negotiations With The Top-Ranked Firm, Gannett Fleming, Inc.; And Should The Administration Not Be Able To Successfully Negotiate An Agreement With The Top-Ranked Firm, Authorizing The Administration To Negotiate With The Second-Ranked Firm, T.Y. Lin International; And Should The Administration Not Be Able To Negotiate An Agreement With The Second-Ranked Firm, Authorizing The Administration To Negotiate An Agreement With The Third-Ranked Firm, The Corradino Group, Inc. (Page 163) (Public Works) C7K A Resolution Granting And Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute A Perpetual Utility Easement To Florida Power And Light (FPL) To Provide Electrical Service For A Feeder Vault On The Site Of The New Miami Beach Soundscape (Lincoln Park). (Page 195) (Public Works) Consent Agenda, November 17,201 0 C7 - Resolutions (Continued) A Resolution Approving And Authorizing The City Manager Or His Designee To Submit A Grant Application To The U.S. Department Of Housing And Urban Development (HUD) For Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round Three (NSP3) Funds In An Amount Not To Exceed $1,475,088 For The Acquisition And Rehabilitation Of Eligible Properties For Affordable Housing For Income-Eligible Residents; Further Authorizing The Appropriation Of The Above Funds, The Incurring Of Reimbursable Pre-Award Costs; And Authorizing The Execution Of All Necessary Documents Related To This Application. (Page 201) (Real Estate, Housing & Community Development) C7M A Resolution Approving And Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute An Amendment No. 1 To That Certain Lease Agreement By And Between The City And Mystery Park Arts Company, Inc., Dated January 13,201 0, For The Use Of The Two City-Owned Buildings, Commonly Known As The Carl Fisher Clubhouse And Little Stage Theater, Located At 21 00 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida; Said Amendment Providing For A Reduction In Tenant's Payment Of Monthly Additional Rent, For A Period Of Five (5) Months, Commencing On December 1,201 0, And Ending On April 30,201 1. (Page 207) (Real Estate, Housing & Community Development) C7N A Resolution Authorizing The Acceptance Of Sixty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($62,500) Donation From The Miami Beach Arts Trust Resulting From The Proceeds Of The First Annual Miami Beach Arts Gala; And Further Appropriating Said Funds For The Creation Of A New Dedicated Cultural Grants Program Which Will Be Administered By The Cultural Arts Council Consistent With The City's Established Policies And Procedures. (Page 213) (Tourism & Cultural Development) C70 A Resolution Approving A Contract Award, Pursuant To Invitation To Bid No. 43-09/10, For The Right- Of-Way Infrastructure lmprovement Program - Neighborhood No. 13A- Star Island, Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute An Agreement With Trans Florida Development Corp., At The Not- To-Exceed Amount Of $696,887.45, For The Construction Of The Project, Plus Approve A Project Contingency In The Amount Of $69,688.75 For A Grand Total Of $766,576.20; $563,131.54 From Funds Previously Appropriated In The Capital Budget; And Further Appropriating $203,444.66 From Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line Of Credit, With Such Funds To Be Repaid From Proposed Future Storm Water Bonds; Further Authorizing The Administration To Engage In Value Engineering To Further Reduce The Cost And Time For Completion Of Said Project. (Page 21 7) (Capital lmprovement Projects) End of Consent Agenda vii Presentations and Awards PA1 Presentation Of Sister Cities Plaque By Sister Cities Committee Chairman George Neary. (Requested by Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) (Deferred from October 27, 201 0) PA2 Certificate Of Appreciation To Be Presented To "Las Maraqueras," From The Little Havana Activities & Nutrition Centers Of Dade County. (Requested By Commissioner Michael Gongora) (Deferred from October 27, 201 0) PA3 Presentation On Ability Explosion By Disability Access Committee Chairman David New. (Requested By Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) PA4 Presentation On The Miami Beach S.M.I.L.E. Campaign By Community Relations Board Chairwoman Barbara Montero. (Requested By Mayor Matti Herrera Bower) AGENDA ITEM: PA1 -4 DATE: 11/17/10 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMIBEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Jorge Gonzalez, City Manager Jose Smith, City Attorney FROM: Deede Weithorn, Commission DATE: November 5, 20 1 0 SUBJECT: Agenda item for November 17 Commission meeting I would like to refer a discussion regarding requiring Miami Beach restaurants to post scores given by the Health Department to the Neighborhood Committee. Thank you. u:e cor~mit~ed to p:oidiig e.\ce!/en, p~/ic S~P,,~CG ufi$ wh !O a!! W~,O iiw, V& in oj Agenda Item C '/ A Date / / - / 7-10 7 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK G? - MIAMIBEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Jorge Gonzalez, City Manager Jose Smith, City Attorney FROM: Deede Weithorn, Commissioner DATE: November 5, 20 1 0 SUBJECT: Agenda item for November 17 Commission meeting I would like to refer the following issue to the Neighborhoods Committee for discussion; the relationship between organizations applying for a special event permit and any charitable donations they claim will be generated by the event, including tracking actual funds donated. Thank you. ifl/e ore c~!?lmii:ed tc pr~icii19 e~ceiient pug? sewice onci saki\, io oil who /ive, WCI(, ~!ld ploy in OUI Agenda Itern CY. Date 0-/7-10 9 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK rzr]r MIAMIBEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION TO: Jorge Gonzalez, City Manager Jose Smith, City Attorney MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: November 9, 20 1 0 Agenda item for November 17 Commission meeting I would like to refer a discussion regarding options for financing the Convention Center renovation, as well as an economic impact study of the Convention Center, to the Finance Committee. Thank you. ' enda Item CL/C coni,;;;ed !,. pp3'3'tidii19 p&kc service uod so!e$ lo a!; uho /ive, vruuk, u!ld ,;by in 4 Ag Date //-I 7-/o THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMIBEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM Jorge Gonzalez, City Manager FROM: Michael Gongora, Commissioner DATE: November 8, 2010 SUBJECT: Referral Item for November 17 Commission Meeting Please place on the November 17 Commission meeting consent agenda a referral to the Neighborhood Committee for discussion concerning overgrown shrubs on dunes and beach walks in Miami Beach. I would like for the Parks Department to come up with recommendations to combat this issue due to safety and aesthetics. If you have any questions please feel free to contact my aide Diana Fontani at ext 6087. Agenda Item C Y D Bate 11- I 7 -10 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.miarnibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: errera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: DATE: November 17, 2010 SUBJECT: A REFERRAL TO THE NElGHBORHOODSlCOMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS VARIOUS ISSUES RELATED TO FLAGLER MEMORIAL (MONUMENT) ISLAND, ITS CURRENT AND FUTURE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT OPTIONS ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Refer the item. BACKGROUND Flagler Memorial lsland (Monument Island) is an artificial island built in 1920 along with other Venetian Islands of Miami and Miami Beach, Florida, complete with a monument visible from a number of viewpoints surrounding the Island. A 110-foot high obelisk with allegorical sculptures at its base stands as a monument to Miami pioneer Henry M. Flagler and was built in the center of the constructed island in memory of Flagler who died in 191 3. The lsland and the monument were both donated to the City of Miami Beach in 1939. The Flagler Memorial lsland was improved in 1994 with grant funds in the amount of $220,000 from the Biscayne Bay Environmental Enhancement Trust Fund and the Florida Inland Navigation District. The project stabilized the shoreline with the installation of lime rock boulders, and created sand beaches and dunes for boaters to enjoy. Many of the improvements and plantings were destroyed and the beach was further eroded in 2005 by Hurricane Wilma. The island was designated a City of Miami Beach park on September 5, 2001 by the City Commission per resolution no. 2001 -24578. A renovation of the obelisk was completed with County General Obligation Bond (GOB) funds on March 31, 2009. The issues of how Monument lsland is being utilized and the impacts these uses have both on the ecology and physical environment of the island, as well as the impacts on the Miami Beach residents adjacent to the island, have been on-going points of discussion. In an effort to address these and other issues, the Administration formed a working committee comprised of interested1 impacted residents1HOA representatives; representatives from community organizations; members of various city boards; and committees, including the Marine Authority, Waterfront Protection Committee and the Parks and Recreational Facilities Advisory Board; and city staff from the City Manager's Office, Police, Planning, Parks and Recreation, Code and Public Works. The group met twice to discuss the issues. From these meetings a number of potential challenges and solutions for the operational management of the Flagler Memorial lsland have been identified. CONCLUSION The Administration requests this matter be referred to the Neighborhoods/Community Affairs meeting for further discussion. Ii'\Consent\Flagler Memorial (Monument) lsland Discussion - Referral ~~~enda Item CY E Community Affairs.doc 15 Date //-17-/0 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMIBEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Jorge Gonzalez, City Manager FROM: Michael Gongora, Commissione DATE: November 10, 2010 SUBJECT: Referral ltem for November 17 Commission Meeting Please place on the November 17 Commission meeting consent agenda a referral to the Land Use Committee for discussion to tighten the city ordinance involving conditional use procedure for second hand stores. It has come to my attention that several secondhand dealers are operating without having to go through the conditional use process with the Planning Board and without holding a public hearing like pawn shops do. If you have any questions please feel free to contact my aide Diana Fontani at ext 6087. Agenda ltem cyF Date /I-/ 7- 10 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMIBEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager FROM: Matti Herrera Bower, Mayor /@'& w l-4 5 DATE: November 10,2010 SUBJECT: Consent Agenda Item: Referral to Land Use Committee Please place on the Nov. 17, 2010 Commission meeting agenda a referral to the Land Use Committee of a discussion regarding a request by members of the La Gorce neighborhood to return sections of Pine Tree and La Gorce drives to two-way lanes. Staff should prepare a report on the potential issues involved, including engineering options, safety, and cost. I thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Rebecca Wakefield at extension 6157. Thank you. We ore cornmiffed to provrding excellent service ond sofefy fo all who I~ve, work, and ploy in our 4 Agenda Item eY 6- I I Date /I&/ 7- /U THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission From: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager Date: November 17,2010 Subject: REPORT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13,2010 The meeting was called to order at 5:41 PM Please note: These minutes are not a full transcription of the meeting. Full audio and visual record of this meeting is available online on the City's website: hftp:// www. miamibeach fl.gov/video/video. asp ATTENDANCE See attendance sheet copy attached. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES The following revisions were requested to the May 12, 2010 Meeting Minutes: Saul Gross noted that the minutes stated that the Chair approved items 1 and 2 of the May 12, 2010 meeting. Chairman Gross noted that the Committee approved the items and that the minutes should reflect that. The following revision was requested to the July 12, 2010 Meeting Minutes: 1) Eleanor Carney stated that Commission item pertaining to South Pointe 3, 4 and 5 (page 5) was not approved by the Committee. The July 12, 201 0 minutes reflect that statement. 2) Eleanor Carney stated that the minutes should reflect that the Commission Item pertaining to Fire Station No. 2 (page 5) state "negotiate unit pricing for spalling on a linear foot basis for beams, under stairs, etc., prior to the issuance of Notice to Proceed 2 for Fire Station 2." MOTION: AMEND MAY AND JULY MINUTES MOVED: Christina Cuervo 1 ", Eleanor Carney 2nd PASSED: Unanimous PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were provided. ' Agenda Item C6 A I Date 4-/7-/U ClPOC Committee Meeting Minutes from September 13, 2010 Page 2 of 5 COMMISSION ITEMS A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH AND M. VILA & ASSOCIATES, INC. (MVA), DATED JUNE 3, 2009, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HISTORIC ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH RIGHT OF WAY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 9A, ClTY CENTER; IN THE NEGOTIATED NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $874,193.54, TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR RIGHT OF WAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SURROUNDING THE NEW WORLD SYMPHONY CAMPUS (NWS), PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE GARAGE, AND LINCOLN PARK PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE ADJACENT ClTY CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BID PACKAGE 9B PROJECT AREA; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING $87,419.35 AS A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY; WITH FUNDING AVAILABLE FROM THE PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FUNDS IN THE ClTY CENTER BID PACKAGE 9B RDA CONSTRUCTION FUND 365. MOTION: Committee agrees with/approves the direction that the project is following. MOVED: Stacy Kilroy Ist1 Eleanor Carney Pd PASSED: 5 - 7 (Objected by Fred Karlton) A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $335,000 FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY FOR SANITARY SEWER MAINS IMPROVEMENTS ALONG INDIAN CREEK DRIVE BETWEEN 26TH AND 41 '' STREETS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT; FUNDING FOR THIS HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FROM THE WATER AND SEWER GULF BREEZE FUND 423. MOTION: : Committee agrees with/approves the direction that the project is following MOVED: Stacy Kilroy Is'/ Christina Cuervo Pd PASSED: Unanimous REQUESTED REPORTS Public Works to Report on process to request a one-way street. Fernando Vazquez from Public Works invited Jeff Cohen and Dr. Chen from Miami- Dade County to present in reference to the traffic flow study on Sunset I, 11, Ill and IV. Mr. Cohen stated that the County conducted a study to see what was feasible. The alternative that the County observed was that the existing width of the street would be retained and converted into one 1 Oft. lane in one direction and a paved shoulder using the remainder of the pavement which is about 4ft. This paved shoulder would function for pedestrians and possibly the disabled. Fernando Vazquez stated that the County is requiring the City to implement the 1 Oft. street. CIPOC Committee Meeting Minutes from September 13, 2010 Page 3 of 5 Jeff Cohen replied by saying that the County is suggesting this to the City not requiring the City to do so. Saul Gross asked if the disability police have looked into this. Mr. Vazquez replied, "No". Saul Gross asked Mr. Vazquez to look into this further with the disability police. Public Works to Provide Stormwater Management Master Plan Report for the Flamingo Neighborhood Fernando Vazquez reported that the plan is on track. Packages will go out in December of this year. CDM is finalizing the model calibration for Flamingo. Mr. Vazquez reported that they are trying to get it into a Design Build package so it may go out to bid in the beginning of the year. Public Works to Report on Age and Condition of Pipes in the Bayshore Neighborhood Mike Alvarez from Public Works reported that CIP will be replacing 80-90% of the pipes that are 6" inches and below, 8" inches and above stay. The 12" inch, 16" inch and 2" inch pipes remain. Saul Gross recommended using a chart of the different water lines, concerning their age and updates, a chart that the Committee would be able to easily read. The 6" pipes are being replaced to larger diameter pipes for system pressure, not due to interior or exterior corrosion. Staff Action: Mike Alvarez to return to next meeting with report using as a an example the chart shown on page 75 of the September 13, 20 10 ClPOC Agenda for South Pointe 3,4 and 5. Public Works to Present Large Map Showing the Outfall Cleaning Schedule for the Venetian Islands Mike Alvarez from Public Works reported that the outfall pipes were cleaned in November 2009. CIP thru JOC gave Envirowaste the contract to clean the outfalls in February 2010. Eleanor Carney stated that when the engineers went out after the report was done they saw barnacles in the outfall pipes. Saul Gross suggested Public Works to look into a material that will reduce subsequent maintenance. DISCUSSION South Pointe Phase I1 - Verify ADA Compliance in areas where minimum clearances are being met with sidewalkltree pit surface material. Charlie Carreiio from CIP reported that the appropriate City staff reviewed the sidewalk installations and found them to be in compliance with applicable codes. CIPOC Committee Meeting Minutes from September 13,2010 Page 4 of 5 OLD BUSINESS CIP Website Under Construction Construction Update: Normandy Shores Neighborhood lmprovement Project A Status Report was provided in the Agenda. Charlie Carreiio reported that the project is approaching final completion. A ribbon cutting ceremony is being scheduled and will be held in the Normandy Shores Clubhouse. Status Report: Venetian Island Neighborhood lmprovement Project A Status Report was provided in the Agenda. Charlie Carreiio reported that watermain work has begun. Eleanor Carney asked where we stand with the encroachments. Raul Aguila reported that the street ends are primarily owned by the homeowner. The City has an easement for street and sidewalk purposes and for utility placement. With regard to any encroachments pertaining to the street ends the City's position is that if it's not blocking the City's access to any existing City easements that may be located in the street ends it would be up to the homeowner's who own the street ends to initiate any encroachment removal process and not the City. Greg Carney, HOA President for the Venetian Islands mentioned that the engineer for the improvement of the islands wants to use those streetends for the purpose of putting in outfalls. Saul Gross asked does the easement that the City have give the City the ability to put the drainage outfalls? Fred Beckmann, Director of Public Works believes the answer is yes. Raul Aguila stated that if the design involves new outfalls then the City needs to have access to get to those outfalls. If the homeowner obiects legally then the City can't litigate it. Mr. Aguila continued to explain that the City's established policy is if an encroachment exists the City will send the homeowner a notice advising them that there is an encroachment and to remove it. Status Report: Royal Palm Avenue and 44'h Street Flooding Mitigation. A verbal report was provided by Fernando Vazquez and it was reported that the City received the DERM permit and is finalizing the South Florida Water Management permit; once that is done we are hoping to be in construction by the end of September and be done by February. Status Report: Palm & Hibiscus Island Undergrounding A Status Report was provided in the Agenda. Aurelio Carmenates reported that the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners deferred the issue to September 21, 201 0. Status Report: Flamingo /West Avenue Neighborhood ROW A verbal report was provided by Fernando Vazquez and noted that this project is dependent on the Stormwater Masterplan. Small projects are being done within this project, on 7Ih1 8th and 9"' Streets. ClPOC Committee Meeting Minutes from September 13, 20 10 Page 5 of 5 Status Report: South Pointe Phase II Neighborhood lmprovement Project A Status Report was provided in the Agenda. Status Report: South Pointe Phase 3, 4 and 5 Neighborhood lmprovement Project A Status Report was provided in the Agenda. Flamingo Park A Status Report was provided in the Agenda. Meeting was adiourned at 7:45pm THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17, 2010 SUBJECT: REPORT OF THE NEIGHBORHOODSICOMMUNlTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5,2010. A meeting of the Neighborhoods/Community Affairs Committee was held on Tuesday, October 5, 201 0 at 2:30pm in the City Manager's Large Conference Room, 4'h Floor, City Hall. Commissioners in attendance: Commissioners Jerry Libbin, Michael Gongora (arrived at 2:49pm), and Jonah Wolfson (arrived at 3:40pm). Members from the Administration and the public were also in attendance. Please see the attached sign-in sheet. THE MEETING OPENED AT 2:46 PM. 1. UPDATE REGARDING THE STATUS OF EFFORTS MADE BY THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENCOURAGE FDOT TO RE-STRIPE THE LANES IN THE MID-BEACH AREA ALONG ALTON ROAD. (3:30PM) Mr. Fred Beckmann, Public Works Department Director explained that the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has agreed that any on-street parking lanes that do not meet the minimum seven (7) foot width on Alton Road will be re-striped at FDOT's cost. Mr. Chris Tavella of FDOT added that those spaces that do not meet the minimum width will be re-striped and widened by one foot. Mr. Beckmann asked for authorization from the committee to proceed in this direction at FDOT's expense. Commissioner Gongora made the motion to proceed. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Libbin. Gabrielle Redfern spoke. Gerry Goldstein spoke. Mr. Beckmann continued by reviewing the discussion with the Alton Road Homeowner's Association and explained the Transportation Design for Livable Communities (TDLC) standards. Mr. Tavella elaborated further on the TDLC. ACTION: The committee (Commissioners Libbin and Gongora present) moved to direct staff to move forward with working with FDOT to re-stripe and widen those parking lanes on Alton Road from Michigan Avenue to 63rd Street that do not meet the minimum required width of seven (7) feet, at the cost of FDOT. (Vote 2-0) 2. DISCUSSION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 46 OF THE MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE, ENTITLED "ENVIRONMENT," BY AMENDING ARTICLE Ill THEREOF, ENTITLED "LITTER," BY AMENDING SECTION 46-92 TO CLARIFY AND PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL PROHIBITIONS AND DEFINITIONS FOR LITTER WITH REGARD TO LEAF BLOWERS AND YARD MAINTENANCE DEBRIS, AND CLARIFYING PENALTIES FOR Agenda Item C 6 fi Date 11- 17-10 City Commission Memorandum November 17,2010 Report of the Neighborhoods /Community Affairs Committee of October 5, 2010 Page 2 of 5 CERTAIN LITTER VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; CODIFICATION; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (3:48 PM) Commissioner Gongora introduced this item. Commissioner Libbin stated that he is in favor of any measures against littering; however, as long as the legislation is enforceable. Fred Beckmann, Public Works Department Director, explained the environmental impact of leaf blowers on air quality and the effects when the debris ends up in the catch basins, storm water infrastructure, and Biscayne Bay. Cynthia Curry, Building Department Director, explained that while initially reviewing the implementation of the ordinance, it was not anticipated to be of great fiscal impact, and that it may actually be overestimated in the memorandum. There would be no need for a special detail to enforce this ordinance as it would be part of a Code Compliance Officer's routine detail. However, the offense would have to be witnessed by the Code Compliance Officer in order for enforcement action to take place. An education campaign was included in the fiscal impact because it would be reasonable to let the public know that this is something that staff will be looking at in the future and will be enforcing if violations continue beyond the education campaign. Jorge Gomez, Assistant City Manager, added that it is important to note that the Litter ordinance is in place and this amendment refines and adds the fact that if a leaf blower is used to distribute the debris, a fine will be issued. Commissioner Gongora asked why the fine structure is limited to $500. Debora Turner, First Assistant City Attorney, responded that the fines can be increased if that is the desire of the Commission. Frank Del Vecchio spoke. Gerry Goldstein spoke. Carla Probus spoke. Commissioner Gongora made the motion to move the proposed ordinance amendment forward to the next meeting of the full City Commission. Motion seconded by Commissioner Libbin. ACTION: The committee (Commissioners Libbin and Gongora present) moved the proposed ordinance amendment forward to the next meeting of the full City Commission. (Vote 2-0) 3. DISCUSSION REGARDING STALLED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND CODE VIOLATIONS. (4:OO PM) Commissioner Libbin introduced the item for discussion and explained that he was unaware that this was part of a discussion at the Land Use and Development Committee. He expressed his concern regarding the abandoned project across from Fairway Park. Commissioner Gongora explained some discussions at the Land Use and Development Committee have been to require a bond for projects so that there would be funding for property maintenance work that needs to be done if a project is stalled or abandoned, rather than having to spend City funds to take corrective action and then lien the property. Commissioner Libbin stated that he would support a bond requirement. Cynthia Curry, Building Department Director, explained that she will be taking the lead to resume the meetings with the departments that were involved in the Abandoned Property Initiative working group to implement those things that have not already been implemented from the 30 City Commission Memorandum November 17,2010 Report of the Neighborhoods /Community Affairs Committee of October 5, 2010 Page 3 of 5 report on the Abandoned Property lnitiative from the Land Use and Development Committee meeting of April 6, 2009. Commissioner Wolfson asked for clarification as to why compliance periods and notification periods are longer when cases are heard at Special Master in order to declare a property a nuisance. Ms. Curry will explore this further as part of the Abandoned Property Initiative working group. Commissioner Libbin asked for more specific time frames to be declared in the steps for "Established Monitoring Policies" as outlined in the April 6, 2009 memo to the Land Use and Development Committee. Frank Del Vecchio spoke. Commissioner Libbin asked for a report as to the last time there was an inspection at the abandoned construction project across from Fairway Park. Jorge Gomez, Assistant City Manager, stated that a problem with requiring a bond on an existing project that has been abandoned is that typically there is no one to collect the money from. An ordinance requiring a bond would come into play in the event a developer comes back to reinstate an abandoned project or re-approve it. When the project is kept alive through the six (6) month inspection process, the developer retains their rights. Hilda M. Fernandez, Assistant City Manager, added that the bond would only be able to be used prospectively and the City could not apply it to any expenses that have already been incurred by the City. She stated that the City can condition the pulling of a new permit with satisfying any outstanding bills. Mr. Gomez reminded the members of the committee of the State Bill that passed giving construction projects a two (2) year extension of time. Commissioner Wolfson stated that he believes the best method for future prevention is to deal with this on the bond issue and for present problems to continue using the lot clearance procedures that former Building Department Director Alex Rey had in place. Carla Probus spoke. Commissioner Gongora made a motion to refer this discussion to the Land Use and Development Committee, adding it to that Committee's discussion on bonding for future projects. Motion seconded by Commissioner Libbin. ACTION: The committee (Commissioners Libbin and Gongora present) moved to refer this discussion to the Land Use and Development Committee, adding it to that committee's discussion on bonding for future projects. (Vote 2-0) 4. CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC ART PROJECT BY THE ARTIST TOBIAS REHBERGER TO BE COMMISSIONED FOR PLACEMENT IN SOUTH POINTE PARK, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE (AiPP). (254 PM) Max Sklar, Cultural Affairs and Tourism Development Director, reviewed the background and proposal as outlined in the agenda package. He explained that after a very lengthy process, the AiPP Committee is unanimously recommending to the Neighborhoods1Community Affairs Committee and to the full Commission Tobias Rehberger's "Lighthouse" project as Art in Public 3 1 City Commission Memorandum November 17,2010 Report of the Neighborhoods /Community Affairs Committee of October 5, 2010 Page 4 of 5 Places for South Pointe Park. Mr. Sklar also reviewed the next steps to go forward with the project, including the Design Review Board and the City Commission. Jeremy Chestler, Chair of the AiPP Committee, spoke regarding the artist and project. Commissioner Libbin asked how long the project would take for completion, once it receives the green light. Dennis Leyva, Redevelopment Specialist, responded that the project would be ready for Art Basel 201 1. Commissioner Libbin expressed his gratitude to the members of the AiPP Committee for all the time and effort they put into their work. He added that he would be happy to support this project. Commissioner Gongora stated that he was curious to hear from the public as he is not an art expert and will need to be convinced as to why this is the best project. He also asked to hear from the Administration as to how this project may impact the off-leash area for dogs in the park. Jocelyne Katz spoke. Elizabeth Resnick spoke. Rosa Lowenger spoke. Carla Probus spoke. Hilda M. Fernandez, Assistant City Manager, addressed concerns with the current condition of certain parts of the park, explaining that funding has been allocated to address these issues with the start of Fiscal Year 201 011 1. Lissette Olemberg Goldstein spoke. Mariangela Capuzzo spoke. James Weingarten spoke. Silvia Cubina spoke. Frank Del Vecchio spoke. Gerry Goldstein spoke. Alberto Chehebar spoke. Commissioner Gongora reiterated his concern with the possibility of displacement of the off- leash area. Ms. Fernandez explained that there may be some impact during construction; however, she would expect that the "Lighthouse" and the off-leash area should be able to coexist. If the Commission wishes, the Administration could look for an alternate area for the dogs in the park; however, this location has some easily identifiable markers that identify the area. She reminded the members of the committee that the off-leash area is a pilot program that must be reauthorized after December and that its current location was authorized by the Commission with full knowledge that it was the site of the public art project for the park. She added that when the issue of the off-leash area comes back to Commission in December, should it be the will of the Commission to continue with the program, the Administration can proffer alternative locations for the off-leash area. Commissioner Gongora made a motion to recommend moving the project forward for now and requested a briefing in more detail regarding the project and the Artist, including having the Administration return to the NCAC in November to provide ideas for what to do with the off-leash area for dogs during construction, as well as a detailed report to the Commission as a whole, regarding all the other issues/problems at the park. Commissioner Libbin asked that the report to Commission include timelines and objectives of correcting the problems in the park. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Libbin. ACTION: The committee (Commissioners Libbin and Gongora present) moved to recommend moving the project forward for now and requested a briefing in more detail regarding the project 32 City Commission Memorandum November 17,2010 Report of the Neighborhoods /Community Affairs Committee of October 5, 2010 Page 5 of 5 and the artist, asked that the Administration return to the NCAC in November to provide ideas for what to do with the off-leash area for dogs during construction, as well as a detailed report to the Commission as a whole regarding all the other issues/problems at the park with timelines and objectives for correcting the problems. (Vote 2-0) 5. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE RENAMING OF THE HANDBALL COURTS AT FLAMINGO PARK IN HONOR OF RICHARD BOWER, MAYOR BOWER'S LATE HUSBAND. (2:46 PM) Hilda M. Fernandez, Assistant City Manager, explained that the handball courts were dedicated to the memory of the late Robert C. Haas, approved by the City Commission on July 1, 1964, and that there is currently a plaque stating that fact on the wall of the courts. Commissioner Libbin asked if a name could be added as he would prefer not removing someone's name. Ms. Fernandez stated that options may include removing a name, adding a second name or finding another way to memorialize Mr. Bower. Jose Smith, City Attorney, suggested amending the ordinance to exempt the handball courts from the operation of the naming ordinance so that a referendum would not be required. Raul Aguila, Deputy City Attorney, explained that the naming ordinance has a distinction for naming inside a public facility which does not require a referendum and following that same logic, an amendment to the ordinance could be crafted to define certain components within parks, such as playgrounds, tot lots, handball courts, and discrete components of parks that would not rise to the level of a referendum. They would, instead, go to Committee then to Commission, as do the interiors of public facilities. Commissioner Gongora made a motion to direct Legal to craft language to amend the naming ordinance to remove certain components of parks from the referendum requirement and return to the NCAC with that recommended language. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Libbin. ACTION: The committee (Commissioners Libbin and Gongora present) moved to direct Legal to craft language to amend the naming ordinance to remove certain components of parks from the referendum requirement and return to the NCAC with that recommended language. (Vote 2-0) THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 4:20 PM. Note: The remaining 2010 meeting of the Neighborhoods/Community Affairs Committee is - scheduled for Tuesday, December 14, 2010 in the City Manager's Large Conference Room, 4th Floor of City Hall. T:\AGENDAY201 O\November 17\Consent\NCAC Report - October 5-2010.doc NElGHBORHOODSlCOMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE October 5,2010 SIGN-IN SHEET PLEASE PRINT LEGlBL Y I We are cornmifled to providing excellent public service and safely to all $0 live, work, and play in our vibrant, hopicol,. hisloric communily. j NElGHBORHOODSlCOMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE October 5,201 0 SIGN-IN SHEET PLEASE PRlNT LEGIBLY MIAMI BEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager f DATE: November 17, 2010 SUBJECT: REPORT OF THE OCTOBER 25, 2010 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING A meeting of the Land Use and Development Committee was held on October 25, 2010. Commissioners Gongora and Tobin were in attendance. Members from the Administration and the public were also in attendance. Please see the attached sign-in sheet. The meeting was called to order at 4:10 pm. OLD BUSINESS: 1. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - EXPAND THE PUBLIC NOTICE PERIOD FOR ALL FOUR LAND USE BOARDS FROM 15 DAYS TO 30 DAYS DISCUSSION REGARDING A REQUEST FROM THE GLBT COMMITTEE TO ALLOW EXTENDED HOURS OF OPERATION OF CERTAIN NIGHTLIFE VENUES DURING FOUR MAJOR LGBT TOURISM AND FUNDRAISING WEEKENDS - WINTER PARTY, WHITE PARTY, GAY PRIDE AND AQUA GIRL. AFTER-ACTION: Hilda Fernandez introduced the item, and explained that since 2000, the City Commission has been allowing alcoholic beverage establishments that hold 5:00 a.m., occupational licenses to extend their hours of operation to 7 a.m. during holiday or major event weekends, such as New Year's Day, during Winter Music Conference, and others. However, this has been for all such establishments, and not simply for a limited number of establishments which may be involved with a particular special event. The Committee discussed the matter further, and confirmed that any extension of hours would apply to all qualifying establishments. Commissioner Gongora expressed a preference to extend the hours for the White Party and Winter Party only. MOTION: GongoralTobin (vote 2-0) Move the proposal to the full City Commission, with the extension of hours for only the White Party and Winter Party. 2. DISCUSSION ON THE ISSUANCE OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) TO CONDUCT A STUDY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CITY- WIDE TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING PLAN. AFTER-ACTION: Commissioner Tobin introduced the item, explaining his request at the September 15, 201 0 City Commission meeting to forward to the Land Use and Development Committee a discussion of the possible issuance of a request for proposal to develop a city wide Transportation Plan. The purpose of the Plan would I Agenda Item C 6 C Date I/- / 7-10 City Commission Memorandum Report of the Land Use & Development Committee Meeting of October 25,2010 Page 2 of 2 be to provide a tool to define all of the transportation projects that would need to be included to maintain mobility within the City and to serve as a guiding document to work with upcoming developments to have a better understanding of what improvements would be needed in the City's transportation system, including intersections along major transportation corridors, such as Alton Road. This would help the City to be prepared when future development or other transportation improvements occurred to proactively develop plans and policies that would assist the City in achieving consistency of implementation as well as coping with anticipated transportation deficiencies. The Committee discussed various transportation issues, such as the cost to reduce headway on the South Beach Local bus route, and the status of the "Baylink project. Staff explained how several studies have been performed in recent years, and many of these results could be combined into an implementation plan. The issue of parking was discussed, and an update to the previous Walker parking study was contemplated. This would most ideally be included in any study by focusing on linking future mobility improvements with opportunities for synergies with parking facilities, such as park-and-ride, multi- modal facilities, and other land use and development policies and incentives. MOTION: TobinIGongora (vote 2-0) Return in one month with additional information on how the proposal should be further developed and structured. Attachment $~~-PGL JMGIJ GIRGL T:\AGENDAl2OlO\November 17\Consent\LUDC Meeting of October 25, 2010.docx LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING October 25, 201 0 @ 4:00 pm City Manager's Large Conference Room THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK AMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.rniarnibeachfl.gov COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: City Manager Jorge M. Gonzalez @%C 4M& DATE : November 17,2010 SUBJECT: REPORT OF THE FINANCE AND CITYWIDE PROJECTS COMMITTEE MEETING OF October 14,2010. OLD BUSINESS 1. Discussion regarding an amendment to a resolution regarding assignment of a police officer to the Police Athletic League (PAL) ACTION ltem Deferred 2. Request for approval to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide parking cashierslattendants and supervisors for the City's parking garages. a) criteria for evaluations b) add a labor peace clause The Committee recommended: not adding a labor peace clause to the RFP staff to define "corporate responsibility" and bring it back to the November 3, 2010 Finance & Citywide Projects Committee meeting changing the weight of the evaluation criteria the revised RFP be brought to the November 17, 2010 Commission meeting Parking Director Saul Frances presented the item and gave a brief synopsis of the memo. Commissioner Jonah Wolfson asked what was meant by peace agreement. Mr. Frances stated that SElU had been seeking a labor peace agreement with the current contractor and asked if there was a position that the City wished to take on it or whether a contractor should agree to a peace agreement. Commissioner Wolfson expressed his opposition to adding a labor peace clause in the RFP. Raul Aguila, Deputy City Attorney, recommended that if the Committee wanted to include a labor peace clause, it be made a requirement in the RFP so that the proposer has to reach an agreement with its employees ahead of time. Discussion ensued. The Committee recommended nnt adding a labor peace clause to the RFP. 1 Agenda Item C 6 D Date //-I 7 -10 Chairperson Weithorn was concerned about the weighting scale for the evaluation criteria. Commissioner Wolfson asked when the lmpark contract ends. Mr. Frances stated that the first three (3) year term ends on August 201 I and that there are two (2) one (1) year renewal options. Chairperson Weithorn suggested moving forward with the RFP, going out to bid before the lmpark contract ends, and awarding the contract to a new vendor to start after the lmpark contract ends. Commissioner Wolfson asked Mr. Frances to explain the differences between the previous RFP and the one currently presented. Mr. Frances stated the current RFP states what the structure will be for cashiers and attendants, how many hours the City will use, how much will be paid for those hours, which includes the Living Wage, it asks what the cost to the vendor would be to provide supervisors that would also receive the Living Wage, and a cost plus portion. Commissioner Wolfson asked Chief Financial Officer Patricia Walker if she felt that the current RFP was better than the previous one. Ms. Walker stated that the current RFP was better because it solidifies the cost to the City. The evaluation criteria were discussed the Committee was concerned with having price weighted at sixty (60) points out of one hundred (100) points. City Manager Jorge Gonzalez suggested reducing the amount of points given for price and including a new criterion to give points for "corporate responsibility" that addresses issues such as labor, time off and employee benefits. Evaluation Criteria: o Experience and Qualifications of the Proposer o Experience and Qualifications of Management Team o Annual Contract Cost for Guaranteed Hours and Hourly Billing Rates for Additional Hours o Corporate Responsibility o Methodology and Approach o Past Performance (due diligence) Weight 15 pts 15 pts 40 pts 10 pts 10 pts 10 t3ts 100 pts The Committee recommended: not adding a labor peace clause to the RFP staff to define "corporate responsibility" and bring it back to the November 3, 2010 Finance & Citywide Projects Committee meeting changing the weight of the evaluation criteria the revised RFP be brought to the November 17, 2010 Commission meeting NEW BUSINESS 3. Discussion regarding a proposed lease agreement with Miami Police Federal Credit Union, for use of 196 square feet of office space within the Miami Beach Police Department building. ACTION The Committee approved the proposed lease and recommended that the lease be brought to the full Commission. Assistant City Manager Hilda Fernandez presented the item. On December 8, 2004, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2@4- 25762, approving a lease agreement between the City of Miami Beach and the Miami Police Federal Credit Union (MPFCU) for use of approximately 196 square feet of ground floor office space within the Miami Beach Police Department Building, located at 1100 Washington Avenue, Rooms 110 and I1 1. This lease provides both the tenant and the tenant's customers (employee members of the MPFCU) with a location that offers convenient access to their services. The initial term of the lease was for a period of thirty-five (35) months, from November I, 2004 through September 30, 2007. The lease agreement also provided for one additional three (3) year renewal term; this renewal term was exercise and the renewal period commenced on October 1, 2007. The lease, which expired on September 30, 2010, also provided for a rent of one dollar ($1.00) per year and additional rent of two hundred forty-five dollars ($245.00) per month. In February 2006, the Miami Police Federal Credit Union changed its name to the United Police Credit Union (Credit Union). The Credit Union has expressed its desire to remain at its current location and enter into a new lease agreement with an initial term of three (3) years, with one (1) additional three (3) year renewal option, at the City's sole discretion. The Administration deems that the proposed lease agreement with the Credit Union is in both the City's and its employees' best interest. Based on the aforementioned, the Administration recommends that the proposed lease agreement be approved. The Committee approved the proposed lease and recommended that the lease be brought to the full Commission. 4. Discussion of a request from ECOMB, Inc., for an amendment to its Lease ACTION The Committee approved the proposed lease amendment and recommended that the lease be brought to the full Commission. Assistant City Manager Hilda Fernandez presented the item. On December 9, 2009, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2009- 27283, approving the lease agreement between the City of Miami Beach and ECOMB, Inc. for use of approximately 1,251 square feet (comprised of 209 SF of office space and 1041 SF of exterior covered space) of City-owned property, located at 210 Second Street, Miami Beach, Florida. The approved lease agreement was for an initial term of three (3) years and sixteen (16) days, commencing on December 15, 2009, with one additional three (3) year renewal term at the City's sole discretion. The current lease agreement requires ECOMB to pay Rent, in the amount of $1.20 annually, as well as requires ECOMB to reimburse the City a flat fee for water and sewer costs, in the amount of $200.00 per month. Additionally, ECOMB is solely responsible for the payment of electricity costs and any other utility service charges provided to the demised premises. ECOMB requested an amendment to its current lease agreement to address the flat fee for water and sewer. On September 15, 2010, the Mayor and City Commission referred ECOMB's request to the Finance & Citywide Projects Committee for discussion. The flat fee for water and sewer was calculated at the time of the lease negotiation, and was agreed to by ECOMB. Because the demised premises was vacant at the time, and the Water and Sewer service for the space to be leased by ECOMB was tied to the service for the adjacent dog park, this flat fee was developed as a proportionate cost. ECOMB recently informed the City that it believed it was paying more than its proportionate share of costs for water and sewer, and requested that City staff look into the matter. In response to ECOMB1s request, staff has again reviewed ECOMB's water and sewer costs and determined that ECOMB's consumption appears to be less than the costs previously estimated for lease negotiation purposes. Due to the fact that no dedicated water meter exists for the demised premises, for this new analysis City staff utilized a national consumption average of 25 gallons per person per day (as determined separately by the EPA and John Hopkins University) for waster consumption calculations. ECOMB presently has three employees. Utilizing that average resulted in calculations that ECOMB's operations consume an estimated 2, 281 gallons monthly. The City bills a minimum monthly water service charge of $47.96 for any consumption up to 11,000 gallons. Additionally, the City charges a sewer rate of $6.04 per every 1,000 gallons consumed, but does not have a minimum charge for sewer service. Therefore, utilizing the estimated average monthly consumption of 2,281 gallons, at the City's rate of $6.04 per every 1,000 gallons consumed, the monthly cost for sewer service would be $13.78. The $47.96 minimum charge for water combined with the $13.78 for sewer service based on average use calculations results in a monthly estimated cost of $61.74. This would represent a $138.26 monthly reduction in ECOMB's reimbursement costs to the City. In consideration of this information, the Administration asked for a recommendation on whether to amend the lease agreement to reflect a reduced fee relating to the water and sewer costs for the leased premises. The Committee approved the proposed lease amendment and recommended that the lease be brought to the full Commission. 5. Discussion of a request from Miami Beach Film Society, Inc., for an amendment to its lease agreement ACTION The Committee approved the proposed lease amendment and recommended that the lease be brought to the full Commission. Assistant City Manager Hilda Fernandez presented the item. On September 3, 2009, the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee considered, approved, and forwarded to the full Commission for consideration a proposed lease agreement between the City of Miami Beach and the Miami Beach Film Society, Inc., d/b/a Miami Beach Cinematheque (Cinematheque), for use of approximately 2,523 square feet of City-owed property, located at 1130 Washington Avenue, lSt Floor South, Miami Beach, Florida. The Committee recommended a $20 per square foot rent, an amount lower than market rents, but recommended because of the non-profit nature of the organization, as well as the type of activation to the space and area this business will provide. The Cinematheque's proposed use requires significant build-out to meet their operational needs. After much discussion regarding the lease, the Committee members recommended a lease commencement date of March 1, 2010 to allow the Cinematheque sufficient time to prepare build-out plans to submit for permitting (at lease five (5) months from the date of lease approval at Committee). Recognizing that the Cinematheque would then require build-out time, it was also recommended by staff that two-month rent abatement be provided. However, the Committee recommended an additional month of tenant improvement credit in lieu of the City assuming the costs and responsibility of certain demolition in the space; the Cinematheque was agreeable with assuming demolition in exchange for the additional month tenant improvement credit. As such, the proposed rent commencement was June 1, 2010. At that time the Cinemetheque's estimated construction costs were $150,000. On December 9, 2009, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2009- 27282, approving the lease agreement between the City and the Cinematheque. As per the Commission's approval of the lease, the Cinematheque provided half of the required security deposit subsequent to lease execution and the second half on June 1, 2010. This second half was to be applied toward rent after the completion of the tenant improvements, with the expectation that those improvements would be completed by the rent commencement date of June 1'' - or nine (9) months from Committee approval (six months from lease approval). The Cinematheque has been paying its monthly rent ($4,205) since June 1, 2010 as required pursuant to their lease (June, July, August, September, and October). However, the Cinematheque has not completed its build-out as originally anticipated and the Cinematheque ahs advised staff that the projected build-out costs (interior demolition and reconstruction of the demised premises) have doubled to approximately $300,000. The permit plans and application were submitted to the City's Building Department on April 23, 2010 and the Cinematheque advised the City that due to unforeseen permitting delays, a building permit was not obtained until August 17, 2010. In light of the delay in completing the build-out, the estimated costs of the build-out and the inability to operate in the leased space to generate revenue, the Cinematheque approached City staff about the possibility of obtaining an additional rent abatement or tenant improvement credit equivalent to five (5) months rent, as well as a credit of half of the security deposit. The total value of the Cinematheque's request for an additional five (5) month rent abatement and credit of half of the security deposit paid (equivalent to one month's rent) is $21,025 for the additional rent abatement, and a credit of $4,205 to be applied to the first rent payment (total of $25,230); this is in addition to the value of the three month rent abatement of $12,615 already provided for in the lease. If the additional rent abatement was approved, commencing in November 2010 and including the application of the credit of one month's rent; the Cinematheque would not recommence paying rent until May 201 1. The Committee approved the proposed lease amendment and recommended that the lease be brought to the full Commission. 6. Discussion regarding the Miami Beach Festival of the Arts and potentially contracting with a professional art festival company to produce the Festival for the City ACTION The Committee recommended not issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP), moving forward with Howard Alan Events for the 2011 Festival of the Arts, and that a report on the Festival be brought back to the May 2011 Finance & Citywide Projects Committee. Cultural Arts & Tourism Development Director Max Sklar presented the item. The Music and Fine Arts Board was originally created in 1962 to encourage and develop cultural programs with the objective of making our Community a recognized leader in the State of Florida in the field of fine arts. Subsequently, in 1974 the resolution was amended renaming the board the Fine Arts Board. This board's new mission was to "promote the work of contemporary visual and cultural artists, to enhance the appreciation for the arts in the community at large, and to provide economic stimulation to underserved neighborhoods." The annual Miami Beach Festival of the Arts was created to fulfill this task and was produced by the City of Miami Beach from 1975 through 2002. Taking over production of the Festival from the Parks and Recreation Department in 1999, the Office of Arts, Cultural and Entertainment relocated the Festival in 2000 to Ocean Terrace in North Beach. In seeking a partnership with the North Beach Development Corporation (NBDC) for promotion and marketing, a Quality of Life grant in the amount of $15,000 was awarded in 2000 for the 2001 event. This grant was increased to $45,000 for the 2002 event. Fiduciary responsibility and production of the Festival of the Arts was transferred to the NBDC in 2004. NBDC produced the Festival of the Arts for four (4) years with the help of an annual allocation from the City of $75,000. During this time, the Fine Arts Board continued to jury the Festival with regard to the poster artist selection, the exhibiting artist applications, the local artist program, the children's art display and the City's portable collection. In 2008 the City once again assumed all production responsibilities for the Festival of the Arts. The Tourism and Cultural Development Department (formerly Arts, Culture and Entertainment), which staffs the Fine Arts Board, managed a professional services agreement with an event coordinator for assistance in coordinating the production of the Festival of the Arts since 2004. In 2009, City funding for the Festival of the Arts was reduced to $55,000 annually. This appropriation was offset by any revenue generated from the event. Since 2008, the offset has ranged from a high of $39,026 in 2010, to a low of $10,500 in 2009. Over the years the Festival's quality, prestige, attendance and artist participation has steadily dwindled. Since 2008, the Fine Arts Board has spent countless hours looking at alternative ideas and formats to raise the caliber of the Festival of the Arts. Additionally, the Board has also spent much time tweaking the entertainment, children's area and other aspects of the event. Recently, the Administration met with Mr. Howard Alan, whose company, Howard Alan Events, produces art festivals all across the county including the Las Olas festivals and the Key Biscayne festival. Based on the current economic market, the festival industry and the performance of our event, it was his professional recommendation that we reposition the festival to include crafts, food, flowers and some art, but not necessarily high-end art. He also suggested moving the date to mid-April when it fits more into the calendar for arts and crafts events. The Fine Arts Board discussed this at their July and August 2010 meetings and unanimously recommended in favor of these changes. Additionally, they recommended that the City contract with an experienced art festival producer to produce the Festival for the City. Mr. Sklar stated that in speaking with Mr. Alan about the concept of the City contracting with an entity such as his to produce this event, he indicated that his company, like others, would require complete control of the event and would assume all risk, responsibility and reward. Mr. Sklar then noted that if the City were to decide to hire an outside producer who assumes all risk in producing the event, the City would no longer have to appropriate $55,000 annually for the Festival of the Arts. The Committee recommended not issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP), moving forward with Howard Alan Events for the 201 1 Festival of the Arts, and that a report on the Festival be brought back to the May 201 1 Finance & Citywide Projects Committee. 7. Discussion regarding parity for future sidewalk cafe fee increases ACTION The Committee recommended the Administration continue to do research and that the item be brought back to the Finance & Citywide Projects Committee. Public Works Director Fred Beckmann presented and gave a brief history of the item. The Administration requested guidance on what was meant by parity. City Manager Jorge Gonzalez stated that he understood that Commissioner Ed Tobin was suggesting that in the future the sidewalk cafe fee would be on equivalent with the price per square foot for interior space and that by establishing a date for the increases of the sidewalk cafe fee, tenants would be able to better negotiate their rental agreement with landlords. The Committee recommended the Administration continue to do research and that the item be brought back to the Finance & Citywide Projects Committee. 8. Discussion regarding recent billing of Parking Impact Fees and the possibility of a moratorium due to present economic market conditions ACTION The Committee asked the Administration to work on the following and recommended that the item be brought back to the Finance & Citywide Projects Committee meeting on December 16, or when ready: amending the map for parking districts provide suggestions for lowering the percentage paid per year review the full fee of $35,000 analyze applying a credit toward the fee for providing valet parking service what the revenue from the fee is used for balances of customer accounts Assistant City Manager Jorge Gomez presented the item and gave a brief synopsis of the memo. Chairperson Deede Weithorn asked what the economic impact of the fee was and stated that more information would be needed to make a decision on the fee. Commissioner Jonah Wolfson asked for a moratorium of the fee until more research could be done to determine the appropriateness of it or reducing the full fee of $35,000. Conversation ensued. Discussion moved to lowering the fee, changing the calculation of the yearly fee and full fee, and reviewing the boundaries of the current parking districts. Chairperson Weithorn opened the floor to public comment which included requests for credit for businesses who offer valet parking services and reducing the fee. The Committee asked the Administration to work on the following and recommended that the item be brought back to the Finance & Citywide Projects Committee meeting on December 16, or when ready: amending the map for parking districts provide suggestions for lowering the percentage paid per year review the full fee of $35,000 analyze applying a credit toward the fee for providing valet parking service what the revenue from the fee is used for balances of customer accounts 9. Discussion of Lincoln RoadMlashington Collins Median ACTION The Committee recommended that the item be presented at the next Beautification Committee Meeting and a report be brought back to a future Finance & Citywide Projects Committee meeting. Assistant City Manager Jorge Gomez presented the item. On February 16, 2010, the Neighborhood Committee discussed the City Center Neighborhood improvements, including the proposal for a new, raised median from Collins to Washington Avenue. The Basis of Design Report (BODR) for the City Center Neighborhood identified two design options for this portion of Lincoln Road and a number of meetings were held. Consensus was reached during these community design workshops for a design option 2, which included a landscaped median between Collins and Washington Avenues. Although the project has no General Obligation (GO) Bond funding, the Administration presented the project draft BODR as an informational item during the September 12, 2005 General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee Meeting. The BODR was also presented to the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) on October 11, 2005. The City Commission during its October 19, 2005 meeting adopted Resolution No. 2005-26035, approving the final BODR. The project received final approval from the HPB on January 9, 2007. On February 3, 2010 the City Commission discussed the feasibility of removing the landscaped median from the scope of work. In order for the project to be modified in such a manner, the City Code required the review and approval of the HPB. The City Commission directed the Administration to make application to the HPB for a Certificate of Appropriateness for right-of-way improvements, including the removal of the median. On June 8, 2010, the HPB denied the request to remove the medians, and re-approved the project, inclusive of the medians. The City Commission discussed the HPB's action on July 14, 2010, and directed the Administration to proceed with the project inclusive of the median. On September 20, 2010, during the adoption of the Capital Budget and Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal year 2010/11, the City Commission referred the issue to the F&CWP Committee. Bids for this project were opened on September 28, 2010. On October 7, 2010 the Technical Review Panel shortlisted the proposals down to five (5) firms. Interviews were scheduled for late October 2010, where a final selection will be made. The Committee discussed the item and heard public comment which expressed opposition to including a landscaped median. The Committee recommended that the item be presented at the next Mayor's Blue Ribbon Task Force on Tourism and the Lincoln Road Beautification Sub-committee Meeting and a report be brought back to a future Finance & Citywide Projects Committee meeting. COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: I A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for and accept two (2) grants and one (1) congressional I I earmark. I Key Intended Outcome Supported: I 1) Reduce the number of homeless; 3) Enhance mobility throughout the City. I Supporting Data: 1 ) "The Citv's efforts to address homelessness" was a kev driver for resident resoondents in how thev view the City asa place to live, view city government on meeting expectations and if they would recomme;ld the City as a place to live; " A lot of homeless" was rated amongst the top five things that have a negative impact on the quality of life on Miami Beach; the number of homeless contacts in 2009 was 14,631 compared to 1,900 in 2003 -this indicates a 670% increase in the number of homeless contacts from 2003 to 2009; while the actual number of homeless on Miami Beach has changed from 314 in 2000 to 149 in 2010; 2) The Fire Department has experienced a 5% increase in the number of pre-hospital care calls for service from 14,796 calls in 2000 to 15,482 calls in 2009; 3) 63.7% of respondents stated that there were "too few" bike pathsllanes. Issue: Shall the City support the following funding requests and execute the related agreements? Item SummarylRecommendation: Approval to submit grant applications to: 1) Miami-Dade County for funding from the HotellMotel and Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Program in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the City's Homeless Outreach Program; 2) Miami-Dade County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Program for funding in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the City's Fire Rescue Initiatives; and, 3) Approval of a Local Agency Program Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for funding appropriated by the Florida Legislature in an amount not to exceed $534,000; appropriating the above funds, and matching funds as necessary, if approved and accepted by the City, and authorizing the execution of all necessary documents related to these applications. I Advisory Board Recommendation: NIA Financial Information: Financial Impact Summary: 2 3 City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Judy Hoanshelt, Grants Manager, Office of Budget and Performance Improvement Source of funds Sig n-Offs: Department Director Assistant City Manager City Manager I Grant Not To Exceed Amount $40,000 MDCEMSI Fire Rescue Initiatives FDOTI Middle Beach Recreational Corridor AMi BEACH # 1 , Match ArnountlSource NIA Grant NamelProject MDCl HotellMotel and HMlS $20,000 $534,000 NIA NIA City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.rniarnibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager 4'w DATE: November 17,2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATIONS TO: I) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FOR FUNDING FROM THE HOTEUMOTEL AND HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (HMIS) PROGRAM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $40,000 FOR THE CITY'S HOMELESS OUTREACH PROGRAM; 2) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) PROGRAM FOR FUNDING IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 FOR THE CITY'S FIRE RESCUE INITIATIVES; AND, 3) APPROVAL OF A LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR FUNDING APPROPRIATED BY THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $534,000; APPROPRIATING THE ABOVE FUNDS, AND MATCHING FUNDS AS NECESSARY, IF APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THESE APPLICATIONS. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS 1. Approval to submit an application to Miami-Dade County HotelIMotel and Homeless Management Information Svstem (HMIS) Grant Funds in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Citv's Homeless Outreach Program. This application provides funding for two programs that were previously funded separately, and are now combined. HotelIMotel Funding Miami-Dade County provides federal funding for emergency hotellmotel placement for homeless persons. Homeless funds are specifically provided to provide emergency hotellmotel placements of homeless individuals and families with children. This program also provides funding for food vouchers for families while residing in placements, if food arrangements or other resources are unavailable. Commission Memorandum Page 2 HMlS Funds: The City of Miami Beach receives Supportive Housing funding on an annual basis from ~iami-dade County for the City's Homeless Outreach Program. The grant guidelines require that all grantees participate in the County's data-tracking software system - the Homeless Management Information System. City staff is required to input client and intake data and maintain client files and statistical data on each person served. This is a labor intensive requirement, currently being performed by staff in the Community Services Division of Neighborhood Services. This grant will partially cover the salary costs associated with one position responsible for maintaining the HMlS data. No new staff will be hired as a result of this grant. The City's application is for an amount not to exceed $40,000. Matching funds are not required. This project supports the key intended outcome: reduce the number of homeless. 2. Approval for the City Manager or his desiqnee to submit an application to Miami- Dade County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) grant for fundina in an amount not to exceed $20.000 for the City's fire rescue obiectives The Florida Department of Health is authorized by chapter 401, Part It, Florida Statutes to provide grants to Boards of County Commissioners for the purpose of improving and expanding emergency medical services. These grants are awarded only to Boards of County Commissioners, but may subsequently be distributed to municipalities and other agencies involved in the provision of EMS pre-hospital care. Miami-Dade County makes these funds available to cities within the County. The funds are derived by the state from surcharges on various traffic violations. The Administration intends to submit an application for funding in an amount not to exceed $20,000. Funding may be used for EMS educational materials, materials, supplies, training, training equipment, technical rescue equipment and reference library materials. This grant does not require matching funds. 3. Approval of the following Local Agency Pronram Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation, for funding in an amount no to exceed $534,000 for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor; The Administration requests approval to execute a Local Agency Program Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in an amount no to exceed $534,000 for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Project. The Middle Beach Recreational Corridor (MBRC) Phase 2 project consists of the construction of an on-grade pedestrian walkway encompassing eighteen city blocks. The path will run north from approximately 46th Street to Allison Park at 64th Street, or the southern terminus of the North Beach Recreational Corridor Project. The path will serve as a portion of the northlsouth connector in the larger Atlantic Greenway Network (AGN), which supports the development of alternative means of transportation throughout the City. Commission Memorandum Page 3 The funding was an appropriation from the legislature and does not require matching funds. This project supports the key intended outcome enhance mobility throughout the City. CONCLUSION The Administration requests retroactive approval to authorize the City Manager or his designee to submit applications to: 1) Miami-Dade County for funding from the HotelIMotel and Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Program in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the City's Homeless Outreach Program; 2) Miami-Dade County Emergency Medical Services for funding in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the City's Fire Rescue Initiatives; and, 3) Approval of a Local Agency Program Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for funding appropriated by the Florida Legislature in an amount not to exceed $534,000; appropriating the above funds, and matching funds as necessary, if approved and accepted by the City and authorizing the execution of all necessary documents related to these applications. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATIONS TO: 1) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY FOR FUNDING FROM THE HOTELIMOTEL AND HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (HMIS) PROGRAM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $40,000 FOR THE CITY'S HOMELESS OUTREACH PROGRAM; 2) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) PROGRAM FOR FUNDING IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $20,000 FOR THE CITY'S FIRE RESCUE INITIATIVES; AND, 3) APPROVAL OF A LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR FUNDING APPROPRIATED BY THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $534,000; APPROPRIATING THE ABOVE FUNDS, AND MATCHING FUNDS AS NECESSARY, IF APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THESE APPLICATIONS. WHEREAS, Miami-Dade County's HotelIMotel and Homeless Management lnformation System (HMIS) grant provides funding for two programs; and WHEREAS, the hotellmotel program provides federal funding for emergency hotellmotel placement for homeless persons; and WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach receives Supportive Housing funding on an annual basis from Miami-Dade County for the City's Homeless Outreach Program and the HMIS grant will partially cover the salary costs associated with one position responsible for maintaining the HMIS data; and WHEREAS, the Supportive Housing grant guidelines require that all grantees participate in the County's data-tracking software system - the Homeless Management lnformation System and City staff is required to input client and intake data and maintain client files and statistical data on each person served; and WHEREAS, no new staff will be hired as a result of this grant; and WHEREAS, the City's application for HotelIMotel and HMIS funding will be for an amount not to exceed $40,000 and matching funds are not required; and WHEREAS, this project supports the key intended outcome: reduce the number of homeless; and WHEREAS, approval is requested to submit an application to Miami-Dade County HotelIMotel and Homeless Management lnformation System (HMIS) program in an amount not to exceed $40,000; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Health is authorized by chapter 401, Part II, Florida Statutes to provide grants to Boards of County Commissioners for the purpose of improving and expanding medical services; and WHEREAS, these grants are awarded only to Boards of County Commissioners, but may subsequently be distributed to municipalities and other agencies involved in the provision of EMS pre-hospital care; and WHEREAS, Miami-Dade County makes these funds available to cities within the County; and WHEREAS, the Administration intends to submit an application for funding in an amount not to exceed $20,000, and this funding may be used for educational materials, materials, supplies, training, training equipment, technical rescue equipment and reference library materials; and WHEREAS, this grant does not require matching funds; and WHEREAS, approval is requested for the City Manager or his designee to submit an application to Miami-Dade County Emergency Medical Services for funding in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the City's fire rescue emergency medical services objectives; and WHEREAS, the Administration requests approval to execute a Local Agency Program Agreement with Florida Department o Transportation (FDOT) in an amount no to exceed $534,000 for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor Project; and WHEREAS, the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor (MBRC) Phase 2 project consists of the construction of an on-grade pedestrian walkway encompassing eighteen city blocks which will run north from approximately 46th Street to Allison Park at 64th Street, or the southern terminus of the North Beach Recreational Corridor Project and will serve as a portion of the north/south connector in the larger Atlantic Greenway Network; and WHEREAS, the funding was an appropriation from the legislature and does not require matching funds; and WHEREAS, this project supports the key intended outcome enhance mobility throughout the City. WHEREAS, approval is requested to execute the following Local Agency Program Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation, for funding in an amount no to exceed $534,000 for the Middle Beach Recreational Corridor; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH hereby retroactively approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to submit the following applications to: I) Miami-Dade County for funding from the HoteVMotel and Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Program in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the City's Homeless Outreach Program; 2) Miami-Dade County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Program for funding in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the City's Fire Rescue Initiatives; and, 3) Approval of a Local Agency Program Agreement with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for funding appropriated by the Florida Legislature in an amount not to exceed $534,000; appropriating the above funds, and matching funds as necessary, if approved and accepted by the City and authorizing the execution of all necessary documents related to these applications. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ,2010 ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE #. FOKEXECUTION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, approving and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Specifications for Precast Transformer Location Agreement with Florida Power and Light Company (FPL), and grant FPL an easement to Florida Power and Light Company for the installation and maintenance of underground conduits and a transformer that will serve the North Shore Bandshell Park and Facilities. I I Key Intended Outcome Supported: I Ensure Well-Designed, Quality Capital Projects. I supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): 82.4% of Mid Beach residents surveyed rated the Maintenance of Parks as Excellent & Good compared to 85.4% of residents in the city overall. This is an increase of 5.7% overall from year 2007 to 2009. 84.1% of Mid Beach residents surveyed rated Overall Quality of Life within the City of Miami Beach as Excellent & Good compared to 84.8 of residents in the city overall. This is an increase of 0.1% overall from year 2007 to 2009. Issue: I Shall the City Commission adopt the Resolution? I Item Summary/Recommendation: The North Shore Bandshell Park is a historic site, located in the heart of North Beach, on Collins Avenue, between 72"d and 73rd Streets. There are two (2) ongoing Projects located at this Park: Renovation of the Bandshell facility Construction of the new North Beach Oceanfront Center On April 14, 2010, pursuant to Invitation to Bid (ITB) No. 16-09/10 for the North Shore Bandshell Facility Renovations Project (the Project), the Mayor and City Commission authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with OAC Action Construction Corp. First Notice to Proceed was issued on June 16,2010, and Second Notice to Proceed was issued on July 12,2010. As part of the Project, a new FPL transformer that will feed the park lights and facilities is to be installed within the North Shore Park property. As a result, FPL requires the City to record a utility easement in order to service this transformer and its associated electric conduits. I The CIP Office had a survey prepared that describes the easement to be recorded per FPL requirements, attached as Attachment C. I The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Specifications for Precast Transformer Location Agreement with FPL, and grant FPL an easement for the installation and maintenance of conduit and transformer that will serve the North Shore Bandshell Park and Facilities Advisory Board Recommendation: 1 ClPOC 2 3 4 OBPl Total Financial Information: Not applicable, no funding required. I Financial Impact Summary: I City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Thais Vieira x2702 . - T:\AGENDA\2010\November 17\Consent\BandShell Park and Facilities FPL Easement - SUMMARY.doc Approved Source of Funds: m MIAMIBEACH I Amount Account MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.rniarnibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti H. Bower and Memb FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manage DATE: November 17,2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST TRANSFORMER LOCATION AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (FPL), AND GRANT FPL AN EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND A TRANSFORMER THAT WILL SERVE THE NORTH SHORE BANDSHELL PARK AND FACILITIES. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Execute the Agreement and record the easement. FUNDING No funding is required in order to execute the Agreement and record the easement. ANALYSIS The North Shore Bandshell Park is a historic site, located in the heart of North Beach, on Collins Avenue, between 72"d and 73rd Streets. There are two (2) ongoing Projects located at this Park: Renovation of the Bandshell facility Construction of the new North Beach Oceanfront Center On April 14, 2010, pursuant to Invitation to Bid (ITB) No. 16-09/10 for the North Shore Bandshell Facility Renovations Project (the Project), the Mayor and City Commission authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with OAC Action Construction Corp. First Notice to Proceed was issued on June 16,201 0, and Second Notice to Proceed was issued on July 12,2010. As part of the Project, a new FPL transformer that will feed the park lights and facilities is to be installed within the North Shore Bandshell Park property. In order for FPL to locate its facilities on City property, FPL requires the City to record a utility easement in order to service this transformer and its associated electric conduits. The CIP Office had a survey prepared that describes the easement to be recorded per FPL requirements, attached as Attachment C. Bandshell Park and Facilities - FPL easement . . .. . Page 2 of 2 CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Specifications for Precast Transformer Location Agreement with FPL, and grant FPL an easement for the installation and maintenance of conduit and transformer that will serve the North Shore Bandshell Park and Facilities. Attachment A - Specifications for Precast Transformer Location Agreement Attachment B -Easement Attachment C -Survey T:~GENDA\2010\Novernber 17\Consent\BandShell Park and Facilities FPL Easement - MEMO.doc 6 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST TRANSFORMER LOCATION AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (FPL); AND FURTHER GRANTING FPL AN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF NORTH SHORE BANDSHELL PARK FOR A TRANSFORMER AND UNDERGROUND CONDUITS THAT WILL SERVE THE NORTH SHORE BANDSHELL PARK AND FACILITIES. WHEREAS, on April 14, 201 0, pursuant to Invitation to Bid (ITB) No. 16-0911 0 for the North Shore Bandshell Facility Renovations Project (the Project), the Mayor and City Commission authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with OAC Action Construction Corp.; and WHEREAS, first Notice to Proceed was issued on June 16, 2010, and Second Notice to Proceed was issued on July 12, 201 0; and WHEREAS, as part of the Project, a new FPL transformer that will feed the Park lights and facilities is to be installed within the North Shore Bandshell Park property, and; WHEREAS, in order for FPL to maintain its facilities it requires that the City execute a Specifications for Precast Transformer Location Agreement with FPL, and grant FPL an easement over a portion of North Shore Bandshell Park for a transformer and underground conduits to service the North Shore Bandshell Park and facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA that the Mayor and City Commission hereby approve and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Specifications for Precast Transformer Location Agreement with FPL; and, further, grant FPL an easement over a portion of North Shore Bandshell Park for a transformer and underground conduits that will serve the North Shore Bandshell Park and facilities. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2010. ATTEST: ROBERT H. PARCHER, ClTY CLERK MATT1 HERRERA BOWER, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE T:\AGENDA\2010\November I~Consent\BandShell Park and Facilities FPL Easement - RESO 62 Attachment A Florida Power & Light Company FPL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST TRANSFORMER LOCATION WORK REQUEST NO. 3941453 DATE: October 27, 2010 NAME OF CUSTOMER: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ADDRESS: 7251 COLLINS AVE, MIMI BEACH, FL FPL REPRESENTATIVE: YESHUWA MAYERS/ JORGE AROCHA TEL. NO (305) 377-6125 SECONDARY DELIVERY VOLTAGE 120/208 VOLT Wye, Three PHASE, FOUr WIRE CUSTOMER AGREES TO: 1. GENERAL: 1.1 PROVIDE A SUITABLE LOCATION, COMPACTED AND LEVEL TO 3" BELOW FINAL GRADE, FOR FPL TRANSFORMER PAD, AND INSTALL PRIMARY CONDUIT, AND SERVICE CONDUIT/CONDUCTORS AS SPECIFIED ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" AND AS OUTLINED BELOW. 1.2 IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT SUBSEQUENT RELOCATION OR REPAIR OF THE FPL SYSTEM, ONCE INSTALLED, WILL BE PAID BY THE CUSTOMER IF SAID RELOCATION OR REPAIR IS A RESULT OF A CHANGE IN THE LAYOUT OR GRADING BY THE CUSTOMER OR ANY OF THE CUSTOMER'S CONTRACTORS OF SUBCONTRACTORS FROM THE TIME THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WERE INSTALLED; AND THAT SUBSEQUENT REPAIR TO FPL'S SYSTEM, ONCE INSTALLED, WILL BE PAID BY THE CUSTOMER IF SAID REPAIR IS A RESULT OF DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CUSTOMER OR ANY OF THE CUSTOMER'S CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS. 1.3 NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR, ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AND APPLIANCE SUPPLIERS OF THE SERVICE VOLTAGE TO BE SUPPLIED BY FPL. 2. EASEMENTS: PROVIDE FPL WITH GOOD AND SUFFICIENT RECORDED EASEMENTS, INCLUDING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND SURVEY WORK TO PRODUCE SUCH EMEMENTS,FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ITS ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES MUST EX GRANTED OR OBTAINED, AT NO COST TO FPL, PRIOR TO FPL'S ENERGIZING ITS FACILITIES. 3. SITE REQUIREMENTS: 3.1 GRADE: WITHIN THE EASEMENT, PILL OR CUT TO WITHIN 6" OF FINAL GRADE, CLEAR OF TREES, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, AND OTHER OBSTACLES BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION BY FPL OR FPL CONTRACTORS. 3.2 COMPACTION: THE CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDNG COMPACTION OR OTHER SPECIAL BACKFILL. FPL WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SETTLING OF THE TRENCH ROUTE. 3.3 PLANS: PROVIDE PPL WITH LOCATION AND DEPTH INFORMATION AND/OR DRAWINGS OF ALL EXISTING OR PROPOSED UNDERGROUND FACILITIES ON THE CUSTOMER'S PROPERTY. LOCATE OR EXPOSE UNDERGROUND FAcILITIE$ WHEN REQUESTED BY FPL. 3.4 NOTIFICATION: WITHIN FPL EASEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ROUTE/AR'EA; PROVIDE PPL WITH AT LEAST THREE (3) WEEKS NOTICE PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PAVING, LANDSCAPING, SODDING, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AND OTHER SURFACE WORK. CUSTOMER WILL BEAR THE COST OF RESTORING THESE OBSTRUCTIONS TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION IF ABOVE NOTICE IS NOT PROVIDED. 4. TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION: 4.1 LOCATION: PAD WILL BE INSTALLED AT GRADE LEVXL AND LOCATED Approx. 75 feet south and 200 feet east of IW corner of Property. SEE EXHIBIT ltA1 FOR EXACT LOCATION OF PRECAST CONCRETE PADS, HANDHOLES, AND CONDUIT TRENCHES. 4.2 CLErnCES: A MINIMUM CL-CE OF THREE (3) FEET MUST BE MAINTAINED AT SIDES AND R&AR OF TRANSFORMER PAD AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN FRONT OF PAD AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED DRAWING an FPL Group Company Florida Power 81 Light Company DCS UN-21. THIS CLEARANCE APPLIES TO ALL TYPES OF OBSTRUCTIONS INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND FENCES. 4.3 PROTECTION: PROVIDE AND INSTALL CURBS AND/OR PROTECTIVE BARRIERS, WHEN REQUIRED, AS DETAILED ON DCS UN-21, AFTER THE INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE PADS AND TRANSFORMERS. CURBS AND/OR BARRIERS MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO FPL ENERGIZING THE SERVICE. 4.4 FOUNDATION: PROVIDE A LEVEL AND COMPACTED BASE OF CLEAN FILL FOR FPL PAD. COMPACTED mEA MUST BE LARGER THAN THE PAD, AS DETAILED ON EXHIBIT "A" AND THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS. AREA DRAINAGE MUST BE AWAY FROM PAD. 5. CT METERING: WHEN METERING CURRENT TWSFORMERS (CT'S) ARE REQUIRED, THEY WILL BE LOCATED AS SPECZFIED ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'An AND INSTUD BY FPL. THE CUSTOMER WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 1-1/2 INCH GALVANIZED OR SCHEDULE 80 PVC CONDUIT FROM THE METER CABINET TO THE LOCATION OF THE CT'S. CONDUIT RUN IS NOT TO EXCEED FEET IN LENGTH BETWEEN CT'S AND METER WITH NO MORE THAN TWO 90 DEGREE BENDS UNLESS PRE-APPROVED BY FPL. CONDUIT PULL OUTLET BOXES (LBtS) ARE NOT BE USED. 6. CUSTOMER SERVICE ENTRANCE: 6.1 GENERAL: PROVIDE AND INSTALL SECONDARY/SERVICE TO PADMOUNTED TRANSFORMER FROM ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT/METER ROOM. 6.2 CONDUITS: THE MAXIMUM CROSS SECTIONAL AREA TO BE OCCUPIED BY THE CUSTOMER'S SERVICE CONDUITS, IS LIMfTED TO THE AREA GIVEN IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A". TERMINATE CONDUITS IN PAD AT THREE INCHES ABOVE FINAL GRADE. ALL CONDUITS FOR FUTURE SERVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AT THIS TIME. 6.3 CONDUCTOR: THE SERVICE CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT (8) PER PHASE AT EACH TRANSFORMER. PROVIDE 7 FEET OF CABLE PER LIGHTING LEO AND NEUTRAL BEYOND CONDUITS FOR CONNECTION TO FPL FACILITIES IN TRANSFORMER COMPARTMENT. 7. PRIMARY CONDUITS & GROUND RODS: 7.11NSTALL FPL PROVIDED 2-5,' PVC CONDUITS FROM PROPERTY LINE TO TRANSFORMER LOCATION AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A". CONDUITS MUST HAVE 36*' MIN COVER. FPL REPRESENTATIVE MUST INSPECT CONDUITS PRIOR TO BACKFILL. 7.2PROVIDE SLEEVE FOR GROUND ROD WITHIN TRANSFORMER PAD IF UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTION EXISTS NEAR TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION FPL AGREES TO: 1. PROVIDE AND INSTALL CONCRETE PAD, PADMOUNTED TRANSFORMER, AND PRIMARY CABLE. 2. PROVIDE CONDUIT FOR PRIMARY CONDUCTORS. 3. PROVIDE AND INSTALL GROUND RODS AT PADS. 4. PROVIDE ELECTRONIC MARKERS FOR CUSTOMER'S INSTALLATION WHEN REQUIRED. 5. CONNECT CUSTOMER'S SERVICE CABLES TO FPL FACILITIES IN TRANSFORMER COMPARTMENT. 6. PROVIDE AND INSTALL METERING WIRING BETWEEN METER CABINET AND CT'S WHERE APPLICABLE. 7. MAINTAIN ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL INSTALLED BY FPL. IMPORTANT: THIS SPECIFICATION IS BASED ON THE CUSTOMER'S SUBMITTED PLANS AND ANY CHANGES IN THESE PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COSTS, WHICH THE CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY. WHEN REQUIRED, THE CUSTOMER AGREES TO PAY A CONTRIBUTION FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL COST BETWEEN OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND SERVICE. THE AGREEMENT AND REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THIS SPECIFICATION, EXHIBIT "A", AND AJAL ATTACHMENTS MUST BE ADHERED TO. ANY NON- CONFORMANCE OR CHANGES MAY RESULT IN DELAYS UNTIL THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE MET. ANY CHANGES OR VARIATIONS FROM THESE SPECIFTCATXONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY FPL IN WRITING. an FPL Group Company Florida Power & Light Company ATTACHMENTS : PAGE 1-3 OF WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS UN-21.0.0 UX-114 -0.1 ELECTRIC SERVICE STANDARDS, (2 PAGES) REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFOXMER & METERING EQUIPMENT ACCEPTANCE OF SPICXFXCATIONS: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THESE SPECIFICATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER AND THAT I WILL DELIVER A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS TO THE CUSTOMER AND ALL AFFECTED CONTRACTORS: REPRESENTING THE CUSTOMER: NAME : TITLE : TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( 1 SIGNATURE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THESE SPECIFICATIONS ON BEHALF OF FPL: REPRESENTING FPL: NAME : TITLE : ENGIblEER TELEPHONE NUMBER: SIGNATURE : an FPL Group Company EXHIBIT "A" CENTRAL DADE- MIAMI BEACH 7251 COLLINS AVE PAD SPECS FOR NEW 300 KVA 120/208~ PADMOUNTED TRANSFORMER FPL I 1 -- -- -+--- ---- I --C-c.-- _---- ---- _L~-C_---- #--- - -c-L - - - - - z - - --- .c- __---- SEE CUSTOMER'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR DETAILED DIMENSIONS. DRAWING # EC-0 1 SEE UX-114.0.1 Work Request No. EASEMENT This Instrument Prepared By Sec.2, Twp 53 S, Rge 42 E Name: Thais Vieira.CIP Deoartment Parcel l.D.02-3202-000-0020 Co. Name: City of Miami Beach (Maintained by County Appraiser) Address: 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach. FL 33139 Form 3722 (Stocked) Rev. 7/94 pg 1 of 3. Attachment B To ether with the right to permit any other person, firm or corporation to attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay cable an 8 conduit within the easement and to operate the same for communications purposes; the right of ingress and e ress to said f remises at all times; and further grants, to the fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, if at a I, the rights [ereinabove granted on the land heretofore described, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through sa~d property. The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power & Light Company, its licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for the construction, operation and maintenance of underground electric utility facilities (including transformers, cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) to be installed from time to time; with the right to reconstruct, improve, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement 10 feet in width described as follows: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrument on ,20 ReservedforC~rcuffCourt Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: COMMENCE AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LlNE OF COLLINS AVENUE AND THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF - WAY LlNE OF 73R0 STREET AS SHOWN IN THE PLAT OF THE EROSION CONTROL LlNE OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 105 AT PAGE 62, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 85"15'45 EAST AS A BASIS OF BEARINGS, 43' SOUTH (MEASURE AT RIGHT ANGLES) AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LlNE OF THIRD STREET (NOW 73RD STREET) AS SHOWN IN PLAT OF THE TOWNSITE OF HARDING, PLAT BOOK 34, PAGE4, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR A DISTANCE OF 91.28 FEET TO A POINT. SAlD POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE BASE LlNE OF A PROPOSED FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT EASEMENT. SAlD EASEMENT HAVING A WIDTH OF 5.00 FEET TO THE LEFT AND 5.00 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 4'23'50 EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.15 FEET; SOUTH 8733'54" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.40 FEET; NORTH 81 "46'38 EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.29 FEET; AND SOUTH 36'28'21" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.1 1 FEET; THENCE HAVING A WIDTH OF 9.00 FEET TO THE LEFT AND 6.90 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF THE FOLLOWING COURSE: SOUTH 32'43'49 EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF THE BASE LlNE OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED EASEMENT. THE SIDE LINES OF SAlD EASEMENT TO BE SHORTENED OR PROLONGED TO MEET AT ANGLE POINTS AND 73RD STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. SAlD EASEMENT LOCATED IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING 1722 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. (Wltness' Slgnature) Print Name: (W ~tness) (Wltness' Slgnature) Print Name: (Witness) By: (I-'resident's signature) Print Name: Print Address: Attest: (Secretary's signature) Print Name: Print Address: STATE OF AND COUNTY OF . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this - day of , 20-, by , and respectively the President and Secretary of , a corporation, on behalf of said corporation, who are personally known to me or have produced as identification, and who did (did not) take an oath. (Type of Identification) My Commission Expires: Notary Public, Signature Print Name w BLOCK 10 p.6. 34, P. 4 MDCR 73rd STREET PO I __ __ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ -. .-- - - .- . - -- -- - -- - _ _ _. .. -. -- -- -- , _-- _ .. __ _ . .. -. .- -. . ,. . -I N 85'15'45" E 91.28' - lo' L-L~;~k~~ R/W ' V) 3 uj P . -,-,- ' ,,m=e-*" ~z-~,~~,~.>c,~~,~-&--/;~.~.-z~.y- --.-=-**d'.z.J'.p*=w-" .:'-- '. *,-,.. -u:x." ..,r ". zaY=...> *-- d -. w 7' SIDEWALK I- _. -' '?'m ___,,-_ _ ,,--.. _*", __"___.__,._ X."..-"-..7-.-- -- '.^ In ,.----- ..-... ... .-,^.A % 1.--.-.---- 4 W i m --5' 5:- ;f S 87'53'54" E *.--- - 29.40;-- NORTH SHORE PARK SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUE; 1.-20- LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS: Commence at the point of intersection of the east right-of-way line of thence having a width of 9.00 feet to the and 6.90 feet to the right POB POINT OF BEGINNING Collins henue and the south right-of-way line of 73d Street as of the following course: South 32043'49" East for a distance of 12.67 POC POINT OF COMMENCE shown in the plat of the Erosion Control Line of the Atlantic Ocean, POT POINT OF TERMINUS recorded in Plat Book 105 at page 62, Public Records of M~~~~-D~~~ feet to the POINT OF TERMINUS of the base line of the herein Q CENTER LINE County, Florida; thence run ~~rth 85"15'45" E~~~ as a basis of described easement. The side lines of said easement to be R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY bearings, 43' south (measured at right angles) and parallel to the shortened Or prolonged to meet at angle points and 73 street right - BLDG BUILDING north right-of-way line of Third Street (now 73m street) as shown in of-way line. Said easement located in Section 2, Township 53 South, Pfat of the Townsite of HARDING, Plat 34, Page 4, public Range 42 East, City of Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County, Florida, Records of Miami-Dade County. Florida for a distance of 91.28 feet to containing 1722 square feet more or less. I I a point. Said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the base line of a proposed Florida Power and Light easement. Said easement having a width of 5.00 feet to the left and 5.00 feet to the right of the following courses: South 4'23'50" East for a distance of 37.15 feet: South 8753'54" East for a distance of 29.40 feet; North 81'46'38" East for a disfance of 56.29 feet; and South 36"28'2In East for a distance of 29.1 1 feet; I HEREBY CERTIFY: that this "SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION" Is correct and meets the Mlnlrnurn Techinloot Standards for Land Surveying In the Stote Fio!.ldu ns set torth in Chapter 472.027 (F.S.) and Chapter SJ-li of the Florida Adrnlnlstrative Code. Not valid wlthout the slgnoture o Licensed Surveyor and Mopper. I CI~ SURVEY,R REU) WORK DATE P . .M. Elo. 2916 10/13/2010 h ST .E OF FLORIDA I c, ENmMERffREC(Xm l.y~ERWRECORD 51 1 NEIGHBORHOOH 2. NORTH SHORE, PARK VIEW IS CITILU~UCER XU~CEDDNUL~ MSIDNERENWKER - de Path F\WDRK\AU\CAD-DWD\PROEC~\SM SMZOIOL fi I DREnOR FREOH BECUMWN PE MUWBY UUI -file new Easement North Pork bondshe)! dwq - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OmENaWER FERNUSOV~UEZ PE CMWR JvlRD FERWIWW"mUELPE : I - rhr ern* -UZP- ~.o. Zi lLL rooad. _lLld_. Im~I~UIIUmNI UIu..uSIILIIII rmE; FPL EASEMENT NORTH SHORE PARK BANDSHELL SWLe AS6Uw.U Wt7 NOI CAP I RMBlffl hp+,,8y %a3m?z olnw EGO! COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution Accepting The Recommendation Of The City Manager Pursuant To Request For Proposals (RFP) No. 49-09-1 0, And Authorizing The Administration To Enter Into Negotiations With The Top-Ranked Firm, Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc; Should The Administration Not Be Able To Successfully Negotiate An Agreement With The Top-Ranked Firm, Authorizing The Administration To Negotiate With The Second-Ranked Firm, Bolton Partners, Inc; And Further Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute An Agreement Upon Conclusion Of Successful Negotiations. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Control costs of payroll including salary and fringe1 minimize taxeslensure expenditure trends are sustainable over the long term. Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): Survey indicates that 75% of residents and 68% of businesses rated Miami Beach city government as excellent or good in meeting their needs and expectations. Issue: Shall the City Commission adopt the resolution? Item SummarylRecommendation: On July 14,2010, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 49-09-1 0, for Benefit Consultant Services to provide assistance in determining the City's Employee Benefits Program (the "RFP). The City currently has an Agreement with Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. ("Gallagher"). The Agreement has been in effect for five (5) years, expiring on September 30, 2010. On September 15, 2010, the Commission authorized a month to month extension not to exceed six (6) months beginning October 1, 2010 and ending March 31,201 1. On July 15,2010, the RFP was issued with an opening date of August 13,2010. A pre-proposal meeting to provide information to prospective proposers was held on July 29, 2010. BidNet sent notices to 153 prospective proposers; BidSync sent notices to prospective proposers of which 54 viewed the documentation; which resulted in the receipt of six (6) proposals. The City Manager, via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 273-2010, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), which convened on October 22, 2010, for interviews, deliberation, and recommendation. Based on the scores and rankings of the Committee members, Gallagher was selected as the top-ranked firm, and Bolton Partners, as the second-ranked firm. A motion was presented by Jack Benveniste, seconded by Carla Gomez, and was unanimously approved by the Committee. I ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. I I Advisory Board Recommendation: 1 NlA Financial Information: I Gus Lopez, Ext: 6641 Sian-Offs: T:WGENDA\2010\November InConsent\RFP 49-09-10 For Benefit Consultant Sewices - SUMM.doc Approved Financial Impact Summary: NIA City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Account Amount Source of Funds: OBPI I Total City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.miamibeachf~.~ov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Members of the City Commission FROM: DATE: November 17,201 0 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 49-09/10, FOR BENEFIT CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN DETERMINING THE CITY'S EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAM; AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES, INC.; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE WlTH THE SECOND- RANKED FIRM, BOLTON PARTNERS, INC.; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERKTO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Control costs of payroll including salary and fringe, minimize taxes, and ensure expenditure trends are sustainable over the long term. FUNDING Funding for the City's Benefit Consultant is provided through commission payments built into the fees paid by the City to the medical plan carrier. ANALYSIS On July 14,2010, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 49-09-1 0, For Benefit Consultant Services to provide Assistance in Determining the City's Employee Benefits Program, (the "RFP). The City of Miami Beach ("the City") needs to establish an agreement with a Benefit Consulting Services Firm to assist the City in determining its Employee Benefits Program, including its self- funded medical and dental plans. Commission Memo REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 49-09/10, FOR BENEFIT CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN DETERMINING THE'CIWS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAM November 17,2010 Page 2 of 4 The City currently has an agreement with Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. ("Gallagher"). The Agreement has been in effect for five (5) years, and expired on September 30,201 0. On September 15, 2010, the Commission authorized a month to month extension not to exceed six (6) months beginning October 1,2010, and ending March 31,201 1. The City's current benefit consultant provides assistance to the City Administration in determining the City's benefits programs which includes, but is not limited to, the following: I. Actuarial support and analysis of the City's self-funded medical and dental plans; 2. Assist with negotiations upon direction of the Administration with benefit carriers to obtain the best prices, terms and conditions available; 3. Annual reporting summarizing the benefit programs in place, anticipated market conditions, plan recommendations and strategies; provide assistance in the interpretation of benefit related regulations and compliance; 4. Provide support and guidance in the implementation and impact of the Federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; provide/conduct actuarial analysis and reporting as required for the City's GASB 45 filings; and 5. Make recommendations to the City to guarantee continued, affordable coverage for the employees and retirees. RFP PROCESS On July 15, 2010, the RFP was issued with an opening date of August 13, 2010. A pre-proposal meeting to provide information to prospective proposers was held on July 29, 2010. BidNet sent notices to 153 prospective proposers; BidSync sent notices to prospective proposers of which 54 viewed the RFP. The following six (6) proposals were received by the RFP deadline for receipt of proposals: Bolton Partners, Inc. CBC Kane Partners, Inc. Deloitte Consulting, LLP Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. Milliman, Inc. The City Manager, via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 273-2010, appointed an Evaluation Committee ("The Committee") consisting of the following individuals: Allison Williams, Chief Accountant, Finance Department; Ana Tous, Leadership Academy Graduate; Carla Gomez, Labor Relations Specialist, Human Resources Department; David Alschuler, Personnel Board Member; Jack Benveniste, Budget Advisory Committee Member; and Maritza Menendez, Center Director, Miami Beach Career Center. Commission Memo REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 49-09/10, FOR BENEFIT CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN DETERMINING THE CITY'S EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAM November 17,201 0 Page 3 of 4 EVALUATION PROCESS On October 22, 2010, the Committee convened and was provided with an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance, the Government in the Sunshine Law, listened to presentations and participated in a question and answer session with each of the proposers, and discussed and evaluated the proposals based on the evaluation criteria as outlined in the RFP. The Committee unanimously agreed to nominate Jack Benveniste as Committee Chair. A motion was made by Committee Chair, Jack Benveniste, seconded by Allison Williams and unanimously agreed by the Committee, to have all proposers present each point set in the evaluation criteria for this RFP. Presentations were held by all responsive proposers, with the exception of CBC Kane Partners, who opted not to participate in the presentations. The Committee scored and ranked each proposer according to the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP as follows: The Committee scored and ranked the proposers as follows: A C D I CBC Kane Partners ( 61 (6) 1 82(6) ( 65(6) 1 73(6) 1 45(6) 1 75(6) 1 36 A motion was made by Committee Chair, Jack Benveniste, seconded by Carla Gomez, and unanimously approved by the Committee to recommend to the City Manager that the Administration enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. and in the event the negotiations are unsuccessful, to negotiate with the second-ranked firm, Bolton Partners, Inc. Specific Expertise regarding the Scope of the Project and expertise with similar sized entities (i.e. hospitals, universities, etc.) Overall Expertise of the Benefit Consultant relating to Employee Benefits Proposed Feelcompensation References Gallanher Benefit Services, Inc. 30 35 15 20 Gallagher is the employee benefits consulting division of Arthur J. Gallagher 8 Co., founded in 7927, a publicly traded company that is the fifth largest broker of US business. The proposed team for the City is comprised of experts from the Boca Raton office, including an onsite Actuary and an onsite Benefits Attorney. This team is the same group of professionals that the City currently relies on to Commission Memo REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 49-09/10, FOR BENEFIT CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN DETERMINING THE CITY'S EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAM November 17,201 0 Page 4 of 4 provide Actuarial certifications helping the City navigate the complexities of recent Federal and State legislative and regulatory mandates. Gallagher offers extensive experience in benefit strategies, plan design, financial analysis, employee communications, administration and compliance. As the City's consultant since 2001, Gallagher has helped the City achieve multi-million dollar savings in its previously fully insured medical plan and current self-funded medical program, and has also prepared approximately 30 Request for Proposals for the City. Gallagher has capabilities that the City can take advantage of to achieve additional future savings, and is also positioned to help the City navigate the complexities of recent Federal and State legislative and regulatory mandates. Please see attached Exhibit A. Gallagher receives its compensation in the form of commission payments built into the fees paid by the City to the medical plan carrier. Gallagher's proposal continues to provide the City with its consulting services at the same fee schedule it currently receives (and which it has been receiving since 2005) at no increase to the City. Those fees are as follows: 1.5% of total premium cost, not to exceed $200,000 per year if Gallagher performs the GASB 45 analysis. The fee decreases to 1.5% of total premium, not to exceed $190,000 per year, without the GASB 45. (See Exhibit "6). The Annual Compensation Disclosure Schedule provided by Gallagher shows that it received commission payments of $200,000 from Humana in 2009 and commission payments of $200,000 from Humana in 2010, in connection for services provided to the City. The City will negotiate the fee proposal of the successful proposer(s). TERM OF CONTRACT The awarded contract will be fora term of two (2) years with three (3) one (1) year renewal options at the City's discretion. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the attached Resolution which accepts the recommendation of the City Manager pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 49-09/10, for Benefit Consultant Services to provide assistance in determining the City's Employee Benefits Program; and authorizes the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked firm, Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.; and should the Administration not be able to successfully negotiate an agreement with the top-ranked firm, authorizes the Administration to negotiate with the second-ranked firm, Bolton Partners, Inc.; and further authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations. T:WGENDA\201 O\November 17\Consent\RFP 49-09-1 0 For Benefit Consultant Services - MEMO.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ClTY MANAGER PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 49-09110, FOR BENEFIT CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE IN DETERMINING THE CITY'S EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PROGRAM; AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES, INC.; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE WlTH THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM, BOLTON PARTNERS, INC.; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT UPON CONCLUSION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS. WHEREAS, the City has a need to establish an agreement with a benefit consulting services firm to assist the City in determining its Employee Benefits Program, including its self-funded medical and dental plans; and WHEREAS, the City currently has an agreement with Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. ("Gallagher") which has been in effect for five (5) years, and expired on September 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission at its July 14, 2010 meeting, authorized the Administration to issue an RFP for a Benefit Consultant Services; and WHEREAS, on July 15, 201 0, RFP No. 49-0911 0 was issued, and notices sent to over 207 firms, which resulted in the receipt of six (6) proposals from: Bolton Partners, Inc., CBC Kane Partners, Inc., Deloitte Consulting, LLP, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co., Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc., Milliman, Inc.; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2010, the Commission authorized a month to month extension of Gallagher's agreement not to exceed six (6) months beginning October 1,201 0 and ending March 31,201 1 ; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2010, the City Manager via Letter to Commission No. 273-2010 appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee"), consisting of the following individuals: Allison Williams, Chief Accountant, Finance Department; Ana Tous, Leadership Academy Graduate, MD; Carla Gomez, Labor Relations, Human Resources Department; David Alschuler, Personnel Board Member, Attorney; Jack Benveniste, Budget Advisory Committee Member; Maritza Menendez, Center Director, Miami Beach Career Center; and WHEREAS, on October 22,201 0, the Committee convened and was provided with an overview of the project, information relative to the City's Cone of Silence Ordinance, the Government in the Sunshine Law, listened to presentations and participated in a question and answer session with each of the proposers, and discussed and evaluated the proposals based on the evaluation criteria as outlined in the RFP; and WHEREAS, the Committee unanimously ranked Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. as the top-ranked firm, and Bolton Partners, Inc., as the second-ranked firm; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has reviewed and concurs with the Evaluation Committee's recommendation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 49-09/10, for Benefit Consultant Services to provide assistance in determining the City's Employee Benefits Program; and authorize the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top ranked firm, Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc.; and should the Administration not be able to successfully negotiate an agreement with the top-ranked firm, authorize the Administration to negotiate with the second-ranked firm, Bolton Partners, Inc.; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement upon conclusion of successful negotiations. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2010. ATTEST: ClTY CLERK MAYOR T:\AGENDA\201O\November 1 AConsent\RFP 49-09-10 For Benefit Consultant Services - RESO.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FQH EXECUTION Benefits Consulting Annual Service Plan GBS will review the performance of your benefits plan; revise it to incorporate strategic objectives for the upcoming year; and sipport your information and compliance needs throughout the year. Benefit Management Plan GBS will review contracts and documents, including policy manuals, insurance contracts, summary plan descriptions, and employee communications; identify any potential exposures; assure accuracy; and manage vendors. Benchmarking GBS provides comparative data that assesses your competitiveness in your industry and geographical market to help you construct workable employee and employer contribution strategies. )Regulatory Compliance Support GBS monitors legislation to help reduce your potential liability and provide: Technical consulting on legislation that could affect your programs Confirmation that your plan complies with state and federal regulations Timely, easy-to-understand technical bulletins and compliance alerts ERISA compliance and disclosure support Seminars on FMLA, Cobra compliance, HIPAA, and more Day-to-Day Support We resolve carrier claim adjudication, administrative and billing issues; provide first-line resources for your employee benefits department; and clarify plan provisions. Insight GBS's portal fiamework provides secure, personalized access to the most current information plan administrators need including: Reference library Insurance industry financial reports Client-specific documents Latest on legislative and regulatory issues \* Security for Protected Health Information 1 through a Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) enabled Web browser. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. Available Services Healthcare Analytics Actuarial Consulting Quarterly Actuarial reporting Plan Modeling for cost implications - including determining the impact of converting to Consumer Driven Health plans Forecasting and premium calculation Reserve setting - designed to ensure the continued viability of your benefits programs Benchmarking - including general and market specific evaluations Audit Services - including TPA audits, large claim audits, and dependent audits Medical Management Services Designed to assist the plan and its employees in managing and navigating the healthcare field. Healthcare Informatics Designed to allow GBS's clients to obtain actionable data for long term healthcare management strategy Gallagher Rx RFP analysis, PBM selection assistance, claims denials, Rx plan design, drug spend review and analysis and medical and pharmacy educational and communications programs are a few of the services that are offered by qualified Pharmacists. Human Resource Services Business Strategy Deployment Including communicating your business strategy to employees, defining how individuals and departments fit into the strategy, and keeping employees and managers focused on success. HR Strategic Plan Design Including helping to develop and align your HR strategic plan with your organization's business plan, identifying the right employees with the right skills to implement the plan, and assisting to fill gaps in talent, and developing a roadmap for other critical HR processes Workforce Planning Including Workforce decision support, benchmarking surveys; HR metrics, turnover studies, absenteeism analysis, union negotiations, and M&A due diligence Retirement Services GBS's extensive retirement consulting - services include: Plan Design Legislative and regulatory monitoring; industry peer group analysis and benchmarking; plan design analysis; strategic planning; budget projections; material preparation; and plan termination Plan integration and Transition Data and floor review; transition timelines; fund mapping protocols; blackout preparation implementation; and post-merger integration Plan Enhancement Plan design and investment review; development of plan goals and objectives; RFP design and distribution; drafting of a market study; finalist selection, plan benchmarking, presentation, scoring, and evaluation; and implementation meetings Fiduciary Assistance Forensic plan audits; fiduciary, document, and administrative process review; plan expense monitoring, conflict-of-interest analysis; revenue-sharing analysis; and DOL self- correction analysis Compliance Assistance Plan operation compliance review; non- discrimination testing analysis; plan document and SPD review; M&A due diligence; IRC and ERISA compliance monitoring; plan discrimination letter filing; 404(c) audit; and IRS self-correction assistance Investment Monitoring Investment policy statement development and monitoring; quarterly investment reviews; style drift analysis; performance benchmarking analysis; and fund expense analysis Participation Education Communication and education strategies; asset allocation assistance; on-site enrollments and investment education services; retirement distribution counseling; pre-retirement planning seminars, and participation transaction assistance Defined Benefit Plan Services Plan design analysis; investment performance monitoring; cost-containment review; service provider searchers; participant services; and analysis of technol&y alternatives Individual Investment and Wealth Planning Asset allocation; investment planning; portfolio creation; alternative investments; rollover IRAs; annuities; and mutual funds EXHIBIT A HRM allows us to model the impact of plan design changes quickly and accurately. In fact, for some of our clients we do the modeling in an interactive setting, which allows us to more quickly review and either accept or reject plan design scenarios based on client feedback. We combine the results from the HRM model with our forecasting and contribution tools to get a complete picture of how changes will affect the City and its employees. We also have a unique model for projecting the impact of moving to a consumer directed health program (CDHP), either as a total replacement or as an option along with other plans. The real value in the CDHP approach is the potential for reduced utilization of unnecessary services, or the utilization of more cost effective services, as a result of better member education. Our model groups historical claims into categories based on how much control the member is likely to have over them. For example, members will have very little control over inpatient hospital admissions, so our model gives little or no potential utilization improvement for inpatient services. As a governmental entity, the City is subject to a variety of state reporting requirements and financial reporting standards relating to your benefit plan. We have the expedise to understand how changes to your plan will affect aN reporfing requirements and the impact that will have on your financial position. We understand the requirements and limitations imposed by Florida Statute 51 12.08, and how that statute affects your ability to manage the expense and liability associated with the GASB 45 accounting standard. We understand how health care reform affects the requirements for qualifying for the Medicare Part D subsidy. And most importantly, we understand how changes in the way you deal with any one of these issues will affect each of the other issues. We will model different approaches to managing your health care expenses with all of the different factors in mind. Our reporting will be structured with all of this in mind. We also understand that decisions cannot be made in a vacuum. That's why any decision to change benefits or contribution strategies will be discussed with our in-house employee benefits attorney. The attorney will evaluate whether or not those changes are permissible in light of legislation or regulation. In addition, the attorney will determine whether such changes might impact other things. For example, with health care reform, plan design changes and/or shifting more premium cost to employees could negatively impact the City's ability to claim "grandfathered" status, which would require the City to make other (perhaps unintended) plan design changes in subsequent years which could result in more costs (again unintended) to the City. 2. Prepare reports informing the Administration regarding benefit market (Market Analysis) conditions that may affect the City's policies and risk exposures prior to policy renewals. Read9 Understo~d and Agreed 3. PrepareIAssist with Request for Proposal (RFP) specifications and underwriting data to submit to benefit markets for the purpose of obtaining proposals for Group Employee Benefits. Gallagher will develop RFP specifications for your various group benefit plans, including underwriting data. Gallagher has extensive experience in the development and analysis of competitive bidding for governmental benefit plans and will bring that experience and expertise to the City. We have sldccessfully negotiated multiple year contracts for most of our clients and would be pleased to use our negotiation skills on your behalf We will work closely with your Purchasing Department as necessary. On the rare occasion when bidders have protested our client's recommendation, our proven process has allowed our clients to success;fully survive such bid protests. 4. Upon direction from the City, approach all acceptable companies on behalf of the City. A complete list of the companies contacted, along with their response, must be submitted. Read, Undersfo~d and Agreed 5. Present to the City all coverage proposals obtained. This report must contain a comprehensive analysis by the Benefit Consultant of the proposals obtained with recommendations for the selection of one proposal for the particular area to be covered. Read Understood and Agreed Gallagher will present all p~oposals obtained and prepare a complete analysis of the bids (unless rejected by the City's Purchasing Department) for your use in the decision-making process. Our analysis will include appropriate recommendations and all supporting documentation to ensure a smooth procurement process. 6. Negotiate, on behalf of, and with direction from, the City with all carriers to obtain the best prices, terms and conditions available. As we currently do for the City, Gallagher will negotiate, on behalf oJ, and with direction from, the City to obtain the best prices, terns and conditions available. In that capacity, Gallagher will utilize our in-house actuaries to evaluate critical renewals and pricing to ensure you the most competitive and fair renewals possible; and we will use our in-house attorney to secure the most favorable terms and conditions available. 7. Review andlor assist writing Agreementslpolicies purchased by the City to assure their accuracy and appropriateness. 8. Review and evaluate existing City benefit related Agreements to provide recommendations for possible improvement of price, terms, and conditions. 9. Provide an annual report summarizing coverages in place, anticipated market conditions, recommendations and strategies. Read9 Understood and Agreed 10. Assist the City with interpretation of benefit related regulations and compliance issues; respond to inquiries from City's Human Resources staff; and provide support and guidance to the City on implementation and impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The flurry of recent legislative and regulatory activity at the Federal and State level has made compliance support a very important service for entities with employee benefit programs. Because of this, Gallagher has included as a team member our local in-house benefits attorney, to which the City will have direct access. All team members, with the help of the compliance attorney, will keep you informed of changes with which you must comply, including Florida state mandates. Most recently, Gallagher has met with various individuals within the City to discuss the implications of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as "health care reform") and discussed some of the immediate and long-term plan design and financial impacts and considerations. Due to the breadth of experience on the proposed team, our team members, including our in-house actuary and attorney, are comfortable providing direction to the relevant departments within the City, including Benefits, Human Resources, Finance and Legal. It will be important to monitor regulations going forward as those regulations may alter or affect decisions being made by the City. Gallagher's actuarial division, Health Care Analytics, has developed a planning tool around health care reform to allow our clients to understand the possible financial impact of this legislation to them. In fact, we shared the results of this forward-thinking tool with various employees of the City, including the City Manager. The local compliance team available to the City is also supported by a network of regional and national compliance experts who keep both our internal consultants and external clients apprised of various changes in the legislative and regulatory landscape. As a current Gallagher Client, the City has enjoyed access to our GBS Directions Newsletters, Technical Bulletins and Webinars to keep you informed. 11. Include unlimited actuarial support with no additional flat or hourly fees, including the completion of the actuarial analysis as required for the City's GASB 45 filings, among others, such as Medicare reimbursement. Rea$ Undersfood and Agreed Gallagher's proposed fee includes unlimited actuarial support with no additional or hidden fees (whether flat or hourly). The City of Miami Beach can expect the same actuarial support it currently receives from Gallagher's full-time actuaries that it receives currently, including the completion of actuarial analysis for the City's GASB 45 filings and Medicare Part D subsidy reimbursement among other things. 12. The awarded contract will be for a term of two (2) years with three (3) one (1) year renewal options at the City's discretion. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. is ready, willing and able to enter into a contract with the City of Miami Beach for an initial term of two (2) years with three (3) one (I) year renewal options at the City's discretion. SECTION 111 - MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 1. The Benefit Consulting Firm must have a minimum of at least five years experience at the time of the proposal providing the same or similar consulting services for medical, dental, disability, life and other employee benefits for municipalities andlor other governmental entities throughout the state of Florida. As a national company with a niche practice group that focuses on Public Entities, Gallagher Benefit Setvices has a large number of governmental agencies for whom we provide consulting services similar to those requested by the City of Miami Beach. Similarly, our benefits consulting client base within the State of Florida is equally as impressive. Please find below a sample list of the Florida governmental clients for whom we provide benefits consulting services. Sam~le kist of Florida Governmental CBBents d Calhoun County School Board .d City of Treasure Island d Washington County School Board City of Madeira Beach 4 City of Sunrise 4 Okeeckobee Utility Authority J Town of Palm Beach J City of Moore Haven d Public Risk Management 4 City of Punta Gorda 4 SarasotaIBradenton Airport Authority 4 Hendry County B.O.C.C. 4 Hendry County Sheriff 4 City of Wauchula J Hardee County B.O.C.C. J Levy County B.O.C.C. v' Okeechobee B.O.C.C. 4 Holmes County B.O.C.C. 4 Hamilton County B.O.C.C. 4 City of Perry 4 Taylor County B.O.C.C. d DeSoto County B.O.C.C. ./ City of Crystal River J City of Eustis 4 Town of Lady Lake 4 Taylor County School Board 4 Liberty County School Board 4 City of Miami Beach 4 City of Hallandale Beach 4 Monroe County School Board 4 School Board of Broward County 4 School District of Lee County 4 City of Lakeland J City of Jacksonville ./ Lee County School District ./ City of Deerfield Beach J City of Delray Beach 4 Duval County Public Schools 4 Orange County Public Schools 4 City of St. Petersburg 4 City of Tampa d City of Zephyrhills 4 School District of Escambia County 2. Have an actuary in house, who is a full time member of the firm. Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. has numerous full-time actuaries employed through its actuarial division - Healthcare Analytics Group. The Boca Raton office of Gallagher Benefit Services has three full-time actuaries on staff. One of the individuals proposed as a team member, and who currently provides services to the City of Miami Beach, is Glen Volk, Consulting Actuary. As you will see from Glen's enclosed resume, he is a Fellow of the Society oPActuaries(FSA) and a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA). Qualifications of Pro~oser's Team Designated Project TeamITeam Resumes The proposed team for the City is comprised of experts from our Boca Raton office, including an onsite Actuary and an onsite Benefits Attorney. This team is the same group of professionals that the City currently relies on to provide Actuarial certifications, Plan Document development, and to respond to any questions or concerns. The GBS Team that will work with the City specializes in public entities and works together on numerous governmental entities in Florida. This team has the capacity to perform the scope of services requested and in addition; the capacity for additional services that may be needed. We regularly participate in strategic planning, budgeting, labor and union negotiations and have had great success in helping our clients manage and budget their benefits programs. Our actuarial work was a key element in a School Board of Broward City lawsuit for breach of contract, which ultimately settled favorably. We consistently demonstrate our knowledge of Section 125, HIPAA and other State andlor Federal Regulations, and are communicating with our clients regularly with our clients to help them prepare for the short term and long term impacts of Health Care Reform. GBS's extensive local resources have assisted the City over the years and are eager to have the opportunity to expand our relationship and provide a full range of consulting services to the City of Miami Beach. We are personally available to assist in guiding the City through the overwhelming changes to the regulatory landscape and to ensure that the City is able to sustain or improve its benefits programs. In addition, GBS's Technical Services Unit provides support through our online publications and Webinars to further assist your staff in keeping up with the dynamic healthcare and benefits environment. Additionally, our Retirement Services, Actuarial Consulting Unit, Human Resource Consulting Division, and Compliance Unit support our local personnel. The following chart depicts the Boca Raton organizational structure. Your core consulting team is highlighted in yellow. Brief resumes of the local professionals who will be involved in providing consulting services to the City of Miami Beach and the resumes and appropriate credentials of Gallagher Benefit Services and the Primary Consulting team are included in Tab 5. a Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. GBS Boca Raton - Organization Chart sjj jr Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. Designated Project Team: Richard SeheH, Area Vice President, Boea Ratow Florida license/Professiona Designations: Florida license Number of years of group employee benefit service experience: 30 Current job responsibilities: Account management; Health and Welfare Consulting Specific relevant experience with public sector clients of similar size and complexity: City of Miami Beach, Town of Palm Beach, Public Risk Management, Cify of Hallandale, Panhandle Area Educational Consodium Glen Volk, Cons8~If:ing Actuary, Baca Raton Florida license/Professional Designations: Fellow o J the Society of Actuaries (FSA); Member of American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA) Number of years of group employee benefit service experience: 27 Current job responsibilities: Actuarial suppod Specific relevant experience with public sector clients of similar size and complexity: Provides actuarial support to numero~rs public entities within Florida, including Cify of Miami Beach, such as school districts (Broward, Lee, Monroe); county governments (Palm Beach, Monme); and cities/towns/consorti~~ms (Town of Palm Beach, City of Delray, Public Risk Management). Paul Hebsrt, Area Vice President, Gorfiplianes, Boea Raton Florida license/Professional Designations: Juris Doctor (JD); Master of Laws in Taxation (LL. M.) Number of years of group employee benefit service experience: 16 Current job responsibilities: Compliance supporf for South Florida clients Specific relevant experience with public sector clients of similar size and complexity: Currently provides compliance support for public sector clients including various f lorida school districts (Browrd, bee, Monroe); Board of County Commissioners (Palm Beach, Monroe); and cities/municipalities/consoI"ciums (Miami Beach, Palm Beach, Public Risk Management). @@@ Gallagher Benefit Services, Ine Florida IicenseIProfessional Designations: Florida license Number of years of group employee benefit service experience: 15 Current job responsibilities: Account management for various public sector clients Specific relevant experience with public sector clients of similar size and complexity: Currently provides account management services lo clients such as fie Panhandle Area Educational Consodi~~m, Taylor County School Board and Public Risk Management. Additional Consulting Resources Available As Needed: Jeff is responsible for all South Florida benefits operations and has management responsibility for both the Boca Raton and Miami office. In addition, Jeff acts as a national resource for Self-Insured employer and provider reinsurance. GBS clients are both public and private, and range from several hundred employees to an excess of 25,000. Over the years, Jeff has been extensively involved in GBS's government consulting operations and prior to joining GBS in 1986; he spent five years with a Third Party Administrator. Jeff brings over 24 years of consulting experience. Some of Jeff's public sector clients include Palm Beach County and School Board of Broward County. Since 2004 Theresa Noone has served as the Health Management Consultant for Healthcare Analytics (HCA), a division of Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. Ms. Noone manages the daily clinical operations of Healthcare Analytics Medical Management Service Division. Additionally Ms Noone is active with our on-site claim audit services. Ms Noone possess over 18 years of healthcare knowledge and experience. Her clinical background includes acute care nursing management, clinical and consultative therapy sales, utilization review and case management for a large Health Management Organization. With the range of her experience in - Callaghn Benefit Services, Inc. healthcare Ms Noone serves an invaluable resource to our clients and division overall. Lending to the growth of Medical Management Services Ms. Noone has been instrumental in developing and implementing our Stop Loss Clinical Evaluation and Consulting Services. Throughout her career with HCA Ms Noone has established herself as leader in her division. Falchael Thomas, PharmD Dr. Thomas currently is the Vice President, National Pharmacy Management, for Gallagher Benefit Services. He specializes in the areas of managed care pharmacy, pharmacy benefit management, formulary selection review services, pharmacy drug spend and analytical review, formulary contracting and other clinical services, specific claims audits and claims denial services. Dr. Thomas holds an undergraduate degree in chemical engineering from the University of California at Long Beach; he graduated with a Doctor of Pharmacy from University of Southern California in 1973. He completed his internshiplresidency in general medicine, surgical and psyche at Los Angeles County Hospital, and is a 1991 graduate of the Medical Management Fellowship, executive MBA program of the University of California at Irvine. He also is a past fellow of Managed Healthcare from the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Science, 1991 -1 994. Michael has spent 12 years in community pharmacy service in both the ambulatory and hospital setting. Michael has spent the past 25 years in Managed Care pharmacy Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. Iscope of Services - Retrospective Below is a list of the services Gallagher Benefit Services has continually performed for The City of Miami Beach since 2001. + Worked with Task Force and Providers to develop in depth analysis of current medical program (Phase I and Phase II) + Prepared and assisted in several RFP's processes for Medical, Dental, Life, LTD and Voluntary Benefits including alternate funding mechanisms. + Developed additional Medical plans to provide employees a choice in delivery of healthcare and reduce costs to the City and it's employees. + Unlimited actuarial services to provide analysis of all benefit programs including: plan design, claims, utilization trends and contribution strategies. + Assisted with all compliance issues including HIPAA, Medicare Part D, COBRA and GASB. + Developed current contribution strategies for 5 medical plans. + Evaluated Consumer Driven Health Models (Humana Smartsuite) for City viability. + Complete review of all vendor summary plan descriptions for accuracy in benefits provided and language. + Negotiated all employee benefit renewals. + Moved Medical and Dental programs to self-funded in January 2009 for a significant savings to the City and employees. + Prepared all core benefits for RFP in 2009. Paul Hebert, Compliance + Conducted a discussion of Federal and State Pre-emption issues on Healthcare Reform for the Deputy City Attorney. + Held a Healthcare Reform presentation for the Human Resource and Legal Departments. + Provided draft language for Early Retiree Reimbursement Application Program l~co~e of Services - Retros~ective, cont'd I Glen Volk, Actuary + Full GASB 45 evaluation Bi-annually. + Provided advice to setup OPEB Trust. + Conducted a Healthcare Reform Forecasting Analysis for the City Manager and Human Resource Department. + Provide plan design modeling and contribution setting during renewal. + Provide Medicare Part D Attestation annually. Works in Progress: + Preparing Voluntary RFP Analysis. + Review quarterly Status Reports for Medical and Dental. + Oversee general benefit program. Gallagher Benefit Sel-vices, Inc. November 8,2010 A Subsidiary of ArthilrJ. Gallagher a Co. Ms. Sue Radig City of Miami Beach 1700 Convention Center Drive Miami Beach, Florida 33 139 RE: GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES, INC. COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE STATEMEAlT Dear Sue: One of the core values highlighted in 271e Ga//agher Way states, "We are an Open Society," and our open society extends to the compensation Gallagher receives. Gallagher's policy is complete disclosure of all forms of compensation. To achieve this purpose, the attached disclosure schedule reflects the commission or fee we will earn on coverage we will place on your behalf. In general, Gallagher may be compensated as fo1lo.r~~: 1. Gallagher companies are primarily compensated from commissions 01, fees received .from the brokerage and servicing of policies handled for your account. As permitted by law, Gallagher companies may receive both commissions and fees. 2. Gallagher companies may access other facilities, including wholesalers, reinsurance intermediaries, underwriting managers and others that act as intermediaries for both Gallagher and other brokers in the insurance marketplace. If such a facility was utilized in the placement of your account, it may have earned and retained brokerage commission or fees for its work. 3. In placing, renewing, consulting on or servicing your insurance coverages, Gallagler companies may participate in contingent commission arrangements with insurance companies that provide for additional contingent compensation if certain underwriting, profitability, volume or retention goals are achieved. Such goals are typically based on the total amount of certain insurance coverages placed by Gallagher with the insurance company, not on an individual policy basis. As a result, Gallagher may be considered to have an incentive to place your insurance coverages with a particular insurance company. Our clients are always our top priority and we take pride in the fact that we always put our clients first. Gallagher is committed to full transparency and we look to you for direction as to how Gallagher is to be compensated for the services it provides. One Boca Place 2255 Glades Road, Suite 400 E Boca Raton. FL 33431 561.995.6706 Fax 561.995.6708 www.ajg.com EXHIBIT B For Employers and Plan Sponsors Subject to ERISA: This Disclosure Statement is being given to the Buyer (1) to make sure Buyer knows about GBS' and GBS affiliates' income before purchasing tlie insurance product and (2) for plans subject to ERISA, to comply with tlie disclosure, acknowledgment and approval requirement of Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption No. 84-24', which protects both Buyer and GBS*. It should also be noted that: 0 GBS is not an affiliate of the insurer whose Contract is recommended. This means the insurer whose contract is recommended does not directly or indirectly have the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of GBS. GBS' ability to recommend other insurance contracts is not limited by an agreement with the Insurance Carrier. GBS is effecting the transaction for the Plan(s) in the ordinary course of GBS business. 0 The transaction set forth is at least as favorable to the Plan(s) as an arm's length trat~saction with an unrelated Paw. 0 GBS is not a trustee of the Plan(s). GBS is neither the Plan Administrator of the Plan(s), a fiduciary of the Plan(s), nor an employer which has employees in the Plants). For Plans subject to ERISA: As stated above, ERISA requires Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. (GBS) to make certain disclosures to you concerning the sale of insurance, and the compensation that GBS will receive from it. Disclosure must be made to an independent plan fiduciaiy for the ERISA Plan(s), and your acknowledgement confirms that you are agreeing that this is a reasonable transaction in the best interest of participants in your ERISA Plan(s). Please review the following disclosure schedule, and indicate your desire to proceed. For more information on Gallagher's compensation arrangements, please visit ~v\.v\.v.ajg.com/compensation. , ' Which allows an exemption from a prohibited transaction under Section 408(a) of the Employee Retirement lnconte Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). In making these disclosures, no position is taken, nor is one to be inferred, regarding the use of assets of a plan subject to ERISA to purchase such insurance. Page 2 of 4 92 ANNUAL COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE SCHEDULE What follows is the disclosure of our actual fees and/or commissions related to the City of Miami Beach and any relationships, or agreements Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. ("GBS") has with the insurance company involved in this transaction. GBS, as agent of record, will receive the following initial and renewal sale commissions expressed as percentage of gross premium payments, or fees as agreed upon by PRM: Thank you for your business and continued confidence in the services GBS provides to you and your employees. If you have any questions regarding this information or would like moje detail, please feel free to contact me. - Title: Mp"7~d I/Z &- ??&r, Line of Coverage Medical Dental Hazard Insurance for Police and Fire Life, AD&D , Supplemental Life LTD Date Signed Insurance Company Humana MetLife Hartford Life Insurance Company Hartford Unum Effective Date 11111 1 11111 1 1/1111 11111 1 11111 1 FSA Administration Stop Loss STD Vision Direct Consulting ~ees~ None None NI A NI A NIA omm mission' / Supplemental Compensation8 1.5% not to exceed $200,000 0% 0% 0% 0% Fringe Benefits Management Symetra Unum Eyemed Wholesaler, MGU, or Intermediary NIA NIA NI A NIA NIA Owned by AJGIGBS Yes 01) No (N) N N N N N - 1/1/11 11111 1 11111 1 11111 1 OYO 0% 0% 0% NI A Nl A NIA NIA NI A NIA NIA NIA N N N N City of Miami Beach By: Title: Date Signed 1 Commissions include all commissionsffees paid to GBS that are attributable to a contract or policy between a plan and an insurance company, or insurance service. This includes indirect fees that are paid to GBS paid by a third party, and includes, among other things, the payment of "finders' fees" or other fees to GBS for a lransaction or service involving the plan. 2 Direct Consulting Fees include compensation to GBS paid for directly by the plan sponsor. *Gallagher companies may receive supplemental compensation referred to in a variety of terms and definitions, such as contingent commissions, additional commissions and supplemental commission. If clients have specific questions about the compensation received by Gallagher and its affiliates in relation to their insurance placements, please contact your Gallagher representative for more details. In the event a client wishes to register a formal complaint regarding compensation Gallagher receives, please send an email to Compensation~Complaints@ajg.com or send a letter to: AVC Compliance Officer C/O Internal Audit Department Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Two Pierce Place Itasca, IL 60143 Page 4 of 4 COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: Consenting to the appointment of Richard G. Lorber as the Acting Director of the Planning Department for the City of Miami Beach. Kev Intended Outcome Su~~orted: Protect historic building stock. Maintain strong growth management policies. Increase community satisfaction with City government. Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): NIA Issue: Shall the Mayor and City Commission adopt the attached Resolution consenting and confirming Richard G. Lorber as the Acting Director of the Planning Department? Item Summary/Recommendation: The Planning Department prepares, updates, and maintains neighborhood and Citywide plans and technical data for the Citv pursuant to Florida Statutes, and is responsible for providing ~rofessional analysis and recommendations to the City Manager and cbmmission on all land developmeit issues. The Planning Department also updates and maintains compliance with the state-mandated comprehensive plan; reviews all building permits for compliance with the land development regulations, consistency with architectural review guidelines and preservation appropriateness criteria; conducts studies on specialized topics; and creates plans for neighborhoods and conservation districts. The Department prepares recommendations for the Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, Design Review Board and Historic Preservation Board. The Planning Director organizes, staffs, directs and controls all activities of the Department. The Director serves as chief of staff to the Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, Design Review Board and Historic Preservation Board. The Director is responsible for preparation and interpretation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Article IV, Section 4.02, of the City of Miami Beach Charter requires the consent of the City Commission for the appointments of Department Directors. While this provision has been traditionally applied to the permanent appointment of Department Directors, it has been suggested that similar consent should be granted for "Acting" Director appointments which occur from time to time as Department Director positions become vacant pending the recruitment and selection process. Richard Lorber has been serving as the "Acting" Planning Director since December 2009 and as such, it is recommended that the Mayor and the City Commission adopt the attached resolution consenting and confirming Richard G. Lorber as the Acting Director of the Planning Department. Mr. Lorber has over seventeen (17) years of experience in urban planning. He has worked for the City of Miami Beach since 1998 and has held a number of progressively responsible positions in the Planning Department during that time. Advisory Board Recommendation: Financial Information: Source of Amount Account Approved Funds: I El 2 3 4 OBPl Total Financial Impact Summary: City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: I Ramiro Inguanzo, Human Resources City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17, 2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, CONSENTING TO AND CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF RICHARD G. LORBER AS THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor and Commission adopt the attached resolution consenting and confirming Richard G. Lorber as the Acting Director of the Planning Department for the City of Miami Beach. Article IV, Section 4.02, of the City of Miami Beach Charter requires the consent of the City Commission for the appointments of Department Directors. While this provision has been traditionally applied to the permanent appointment of Department Directors, it has been suggested that similar consent should be granted for "Acting" Director appointments which occur from time to time as Department Director positions become vacant pending the recruitment and selection process. Given that Mr. Lorber is the Acting Director and thus performing the duties of the Director, his acting appointment is being presented to the Mayor and Commission for consent. ANALYSIS The Planning Department prepares, updates, and maintains neighborhood and Citywide plans and technical data for the City pursuant to Florida Statutes, and is responsible for providing professional analysis and recommendations to the City Manager and Commission on all land development issues. The Planning Department also updates and maintains compliance with the state-mandated comprehensive plan; reviews all building permits for compliance with the land development regulations, consistency with architectural review guidelines and preservation appropriateness criteria; conducts studies on specialized topics; and creates plans for neighborhoods and conservation districts. The Department prepares recommendations for the Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, Design Review Board and Historic Preservation Board. The Planning Director organizes, staffs, directs and controls all activities of the Department. The Director serves as chief of staff to the Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, Design Review Board and Historic Preservation Board. The Director is responsible for preparation and interpretation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Lorber has over 17 years of experience in urban planning, with a proven record of progressively challenging work assignments. A copy of his resume is attached. Mr. Lorber first joined the City of Miami Beach in June 1998 as the Principal PlannerISenior Planner. Two years later, Mr. Lorber left the City to become the Planning Director for the City of South Miami, a position he held until June 2003. In June 2003, Mr. Lorber returned to the City of Miami Beach, accepting the position of Planning and Zoning Manager. In this role, Mr. Lorber managed all aspects of the Planning and Zoning Section, and was the principal staff representative to the Planning Board and the Board of Adjustment. Most recently, from October 2009 to the present, Mr. Lorber has been serving as the City's Acting Planning Director. As such, he is responsible for managing the operations of the Planning Department, serving as chief of staff to all development review boards, and making presentations to the City Commission and community groups on planning and related issues. Mr. Lorber issues official interpretations of the Zoning Code, and serves as mediator on zoning compliance disputes. Mr. Lorber holds a Master of Urban and Regional Planning from Florida Atlantic University; a Master of Arts in Economics from Florida International University; and a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from New England College. Mr. Lorber is a LEED Accredited Professional from the U.S. Green Building Council and a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). CONCLUSION The appointment of Richard G. Lorber as Acting Director of the Planning Department will ensure that the City continues its nationally and internationally recognized tradition of progressive urban design and planning leadership. Pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 4.02, of the City Charter, it is recommended that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the resolution consenting and confirming Richard G. Lorber as the Acting Director of the Planning Department. T:\AGENDA\201 O\November 17\Consent\Richad G. Lorber Commission Memorandum.docx Richard G. Lorber, AICP, -LEED AP Experience October 2009 - present I Acting Planning Director City of Miami Beach Planning Department Responsible for managing the operations of the Planning Department and supervising all staff. Serving as chief of staff to all development review boards, and making presentations to the City Commission and community groups on planning and related issues. Interpreting the Zoning Code, issuing official interpretations, and serving as mediator regarding disputes on zoning compliance. Coordinating planning issues with other City Departments, and responding to citizens and Commission inquiries and complaints regarding planning and development issues. June 2003 - October 2009 1 Planning and Zoning Manager City of Miami Beach Planning Department Manages and coordinates all aspects of the Planning and Zoning Section, including interviewing and hiring new personnel, budget preparation, information technology and other administrative functions. Principal st& to the Planning Board and Board of Adjustment, writes legislation, prepares reports and presentations to City Commission regarding Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. Represents the City Ahstration and Planning Department at public hearings and meetings. Chair of the City's G.I.S. User Group. December 2000 - June 2003 1 Planning Director City of South Miami Planning Department Responsible for all planning and zoning activities of the City. Supervised Planning department staff, coordinated departmental and consultant work products, provided for City compliance with Florida Statues concerning required planning functions, and provided staff services to the Planning Board, Environmental Review & Historic Preservation Board (ERPB), and other boards and committees. June 1998 - December 2000 1 Principal Planner / Senior Planner City of Miami Beach Planning Department Principal staff to Planning Board, prepared reports and presentations to the Board. Wrote amendments to the Zoning Ordmance dealing with development and land use regulations, including major cityvvlde downzoning initiative. Coordinated the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. July 1995 - June 1998 1 Associate Planner Broward County Planning Council Responsible for transportation and land use planning as part of a countpnde comprehensive planning agency. July 1993 - July 1995 1 Planning Analyst Broward County Dept. Of Strategic Planning And Growth Management Transportation Planning Division Planning efforts focused on transportation planning and mass transit coordination. Education Florida Atlantic University I Master of Urban and Regional Planning 1997 Florida International University I Master of Arts, Economics 1988 New England College I Bachelor of Arts, Economics 1983 / Dean's List 1980, 1982 Professional / Service American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Member / Certified Planner U.S. Green Building Council LEED Accredited Professional Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Incident Management Systems (NIMS) Command and General Staff Training IS-100 through IS-800 IS-253 Coordinating Environmental and Historic Preservation Compliance Leadership Miami Class of 1999-2000 Florida Atlantic University Adjunct Professor, School of Urban and Public Affairs 2000-2002 American Planning Association, Florida Chapter Chairman, Executive Committee, Gold Coast Section 2000-2002 City of Hollywood * Citizens Transportation Committee 1996- 1999 National Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi a Inducted March 1997 a RESOLUTIONS TO BE SUBMITTED COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: Consenting to the appointment of Cynthia W. Curry as the Acting Director of the Building Department for the Citv of Miami Beach. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Ensure compliance with Code within reasonable time frame. Ensure safety and appearance of building structures and sites. Stabilize residential condominiums. Increase community satisfaction with City government. Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): NIA Issue: Shall the Mayor and City Commission adopt the attached Resolution consenting and confirming Cynthia W. Curry as the Acting Director of the Building Department? Item SummarylRecommendation: The Building Department provides supervision of construction activities, acceptance of building permit -. applications, issuance of 'all building and trade permits, verification of compliance with the-Florida Building Code and enforcement of codes promulgated by regulatory agencies such as the Hotel and Restaurant Commission, Miami-Dade Environmental Resources Management, State Departments of Health and Professional Regulation, Board of Adjustment and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Plumbing, Building, Electrical, Elevator and mechanical officials inspect new and existing structures for compliance. The Director of the Building Department plans, organizes, directs and controls the activities of the City's Building Department. Article IV, Section 4.02, of the City of Miami Beach Charter requires the consent of the City Commission for the appointments of Department Directors. While this provision has been traditionally applied to the permanent appointment of Department Directors, it has been suggested that similar consent should be granted for "Acting" Director appointments which occur from time to time as Department Director positions become vacant pending the recruitment and selection process. While Ms. Curry is currently classified as an Executive Assistant to the City Manager, her primary assignment (pending the outcome of recruitment processes underway) has been as Acting Building Director. Ms. Curry has over 30 years of experience in local government management and a proven record of undertaking highly responsible and challenging assignments. She previously served as Senior AdvisorlAssistant County Manager in Miami-Dade County and held a number of other highly responsible positions in Miami Dade County. Ms. Curry also served as the Vice President of Business and Finance at Florida International University (Flu). Ms. Curry holds a Bachelor of Arts in Politics and Public Affairs and a Master of Arts in Politics and Public Affairs from the University of Miami. Advisory Board Recommendation: 1 NIA Financial Information: I I I City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: I Ramiro Inguanzo, Human Resources Source of Funds: El OBPl I I Date 11 -1 7-16' Financial Impact Summary: 1 2 3 4 Total Account Amount Approved City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City C mission 7 FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17, 2010 m SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR ND C COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, CONSENTING TO THE APPOINTMENT OF CYNTHIA W. CURRY AS THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor and Commission adopt the attached resolution consenting and confirming Cynthia W. Curry as the Acting Director of the Building Department for the City of Miami Beach. Article IV, Section 4.02, of the City of Miami Beach Charter requires the consent of the City Commission for the appointments of Department Directors. While this provision has been traditionally applied to the permanent appointment of Department Directors, it has been suggested that similar consent should be granted for "Acting" Director appointments which occur from time to time as Department Director positions become vacant pending the recruitment and selection process. Ms. Curry was hired in September 2010 as an Executive Assistant to the City Manager. Since that time, and pending the outcome of recruitment processes underway, Cynthia's primary assignment has been as the Acting Director of the Building Department. This classification requires consent by the City Commission. ANALYSIS Ms. Curry has over 30 years of experience in local government management, and a proven record of undertaking highly responsible and challenging assignments. A copy of her resume s attached. Most recently, from February 2006 to February 2010, Ms. Curry served as Senior Advisor/Assistant County Manager in Miami-Dade County. During this time, she was charged with developing housing and economic development strategies, as well as overseeing several County departments and agencies, including: the Finance Department; the Property Appraiser's Office; the Department of Housing and Community Development; the Office of Economic Development Coordination; the Miami-Dade Public Housing Agency; the Homeless Trust; the Urban Revitalization Task Force; the Housing Finance Authority and the International Trade Commission. Ms. Curry began her professional public administration career at Miami-Dade County. From 1977 to 1988, she worked her way up the ranks in Miami-Dade County government, beginning her career as a Management Trainee, transitioning to the Office of Management and Budget and ultimately joining the County Manager's Office. As an Assistant County Manager from June 1988 to August 1995, she managed a portfolio of various departments, and was called upon to oversee major projects for the County. Shortly after Hurricane Andrew, Ms. Curry was tasked with establishing and managing Project C.H.A.R.T. (Coordinated Hurricane Andrew Recovery Team). As administrator of this project, she worked with representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the State of Florida to coordinate and accelerate the recovery and rebuilding South Miami-Dade. In 1995, Ms. Curry was appointed Vice President of Business and Finance at Florida International University (Flu). In this role, she provided direct assistance to the president of the University as the chief business and finance officer responsible for managing such divisions as budget development and planning; purchasing and central support services and human resources. Also during this period, she was appointed by Governor Lawton Chiles to serve as a member of the City of Miami Financial Oversight Board. Ms. Curry holds a Bachelor of Arts in Politics and Public Affairs and a Master of Arts in Politics and Public Affairs from the University of Miami. CONCLUSION The appointment of Cynthia W. Curry as Acting Director of the Building Department will ensure that the City continues to improve its building development processes, thereby enhancing the service provided to residents, visitors and members of the construction trade. Pursuant to the requirements of Article IV, Section 4.02, of the City Charter, it is recommended that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the resolution consenting and confirming Cynthia W. Curry as the Acting Director of the Building Department. T:\AGENDA\2010\Novernber 17\Consent\Cynthia Curry Merno.docx PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE FEBRUARY 21,2006 -FEBRUAR\~ 12,2010 COUSTY EL~c~~x\:~ OFFICE, R'II.~~~.II-DA.DE COUKTY SEXIOR ADVISOR /ASSIST.~T COUS11' hI.WAGER Charged with the responsibility of developing and guiding the implementation of critically important housing and economic development strategies in addition to the oilersight of the Finance Department, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Department of Housing and Co~munity Development, Office of Economic Developtnent Coordination, Miami-Dade Public Housing Agency, the Homeless Trust, Urban Revitalization Task Force, Housing Finance Authority, and International Trade Consortium. DECEMBER 19: 1998 -DECEMBER 2005 CWC &: ASSOCIATES, Ixc., PRESIDENTICEO Directed corporate and public business consulting in the areas of business process re- engineering; human resources development; community development and capacity building; facilities services and construction management; marketinglprornotions, and event planning. * Provided direct assistance and support to the President of the University, as the Chief Business and Finance Officer for the University responsible for organizing and managing divisions of human resources; facilities planning, design and operations; purchasing and central support services; accounting; campus security; enviromnental health and safety; traffic; parking; auxiliary senricest budget development and plaming. Those reporting directly to the Senior Vice President for Business and Finance included an Associate Vice President, an Assistant Vice President and tell Directors. Senred as the liaison with the Florida Board of Regents for all administrative matters, and served on the University Foundation, President's Executive Council, University Administrative Council, and the Board of Regent's Council on Administrative and Financial Affairs. Cynthia W. Curry .;.1 Provided direct assistance and support to the County Manager in upholding fiduciary responsibilities to the Board of County Commissioners and to the public; administered the policies and programs of Metropolitan Dade County Government, a multi-cultural, general purpose government, senring 2,000,000 residents Department of General Services Administration - Provided central support services, including fleet: procurement, materials and insurance management necessary for the proper operation of County Government Department of Business and Economic Development - Provided direction and coordination of technical assistance to minority and small businesses, and insured compliance with race/gender conscious measures: and the Responsible Wages and Benefits Ordinance Department of Development and Facilities Management - Provided necessary central support services in the areas of facilities management, design, construction and maintenance, real estate acquisition, and lease negotiation and management Office of Contract Coordination - Provided direction in the collection, automation and dissemination of information regarding capitaVconstruction projects, including the selection of Architecture and Engineering consultants for professional services Office of Community Development - Administered the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Partnership lnvestnlent Programs to improve neighborhoods and affordable housing stock Special Housing Programs - Provided programs that improve the availability and condition of privately- owned low and moderate-income housing in Dade County (Moderate Rehabilitation, Housing Rental Assistance, Surtax Home ownership) Independent Review Panel - Provided a process to accept and resolve complaints against Metro-Dade County agencies and/or employees Cynthia W. Curry . Provided assistance to Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners as needed Senred as the County Manager's liaison for Government Operations Committee. Served as staff liaison for the Internal Management B Charter Review Committee, and the Community & Economic Development and Agiculture Committee of the Board of County Commissioners Senred as the South Dade Hurricane Recovery Administrator - Project: C.H.A.R.T. (Coordinated Hurricane Andrew Recovery Tearn) working with administrators from HUD, FEMA, and the State of Florida to coordinate and accelerate the long-tern recovery process of cleaning up and rebuilding South Dade Developed and directed an emergency construction program to expedite the critical repair and clean-up of County facilities after Humcane Andrew Developed a permitting assistance program to assist the Beacon Council with potential businesses to expedite critical permitting requirements for projects that could have a significant impact on the local economy Directed the planning and development of the Economic Recovery Strategies and the South Dade Neighborhood Development Plan. These planning documents provided a basis for the expenditure of disaster relief funding from the State and Federal Government Served as a working member of the Homestead Air Force Base Re-Use and Economic Redevelopment Plan Steering Committee, and senred as the liaison on behalf of Metro- Dade with representatives of the Department of Defense Participated in the preparation of application for national competition to the Department of Labor which ultimately resulted in the designation of Homestead Air Force Base as a site for one of nine Job Corps Centers Provided direction and oversight in the development and i~nplernentation of minority business programs for Blacks, Hispanics and Women Co-Chair (1992-1994), provided guidance and oversight for the Annual Business Assistance Expo, with over 5,000 attendees visiting exhibits and attending workshops on topics such as international trade and export opportunities: small and minority business development, financing, govemnent procurements, and recruitment/training Cylthia W. Curry - -. . FEBRUARY 1987 -JUNE 1988 &'~ETROPOLIT.&X DADE COUXTY, OFFICE OF THE COUTTY RI:~XAGEH EXECWIYE ASSISTAVr TO THE DEPUTY COUNTY R'IANAGER, AND INTEIUM COUNTY RItmT~c~~ Provided direct assistance to the Deputy County Manager and the County Manager in adnlinistering the polic.ies and programs of Metropolitan Dade County Government o Provided administrative coordination for the Metro-Dade legislative package (State and Federal) and monitored the progress of the package during the legislative session By appointment of the County Manager, senled on several special project management teams (1) Personnel Placement (Pipeline) Cormnittee - responsible for overseeing the placement process for employees impacted by adverse budget decisions (3) Housing and Urban Deveioprnent Special Project Team - responsible for implementing a comprehensive inspection and repair program for 12,100 HUD units, with specific responsibility for administrative and fiscal aspects of the project (procurement, information systems, and budget) APRIL 1985 - JAA~UAR Z' 1987 - ASSISTA:\~T DIRECTOR Responsible for assisting the Director with supervision and administration of both Budget and Management Services staff Responsible for the coordination of the County Manager's Management Trainee Program JUL r 1983 - .IIl.ai RCH 1985- BUDGET COORDII\'ATOR Responsible for the preparation, format and publication of the Dade County Proposed Operating Budget. Estimated all revenues and expenditures for the General Fund Responsible for the monitoring and review process of the operating budget with direct supervision of seven budget analysts Responsible for assuring budget process met requirements of Florida Statutes (TRIM Bill) and local government half-cent sales tax legislation Responsible for assuring compliance with budgetary requirements for Federal Revenue Sharing Cynthia W. Curry. . - Responsible for the analysis and on-going review of the budgets for various County agencies, including Judicial Administration and Clerk of the Courts Responsible for oversight of general government expenditures budgeted at over $200 million. A UCUST 1978 -JUNE .I 983 - BUDGET AIULYST Responsible for analysis, and on-going review of budgets for Human Resources, Environmental Resources Management, Fire and Rescue, Traffic and Transportation Administration, Parks and Recreation, Industrial Development Authority, Community and Economic Development, the Miami-Dade Criminal Justice Council, and the Metro-Dade Police Department. Responsible for conducting a park study on the Miami Lakes Special Taxing District for use in unit cost analysis and use in the preparation of the Parks and Recreation Department budget Developed a format by 157hich the recovery of indirect costs could be monitored by the Office of Management and Budget Assisted in the preparation of departmental budgets; formulated resolutions, coordinated Community Development neighborhood forums; monitored performance of departments with Community Development Block Grants EDUCATION M.~Y 1977 - UXIVERSITY OF MIAMI, CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA Bachelor of Arts Degree - Politics & Public Affairs Mortar Board Honor Society; Pi Sigma Alpha Political Science Honor Society AUGUST 1978 - UNIVERSITY OF MMMI GRADUATE SCHOOL, CORAL GABLES, FLOR~DA Master of Arts Degree - Politics and Public Affairs DECEMBER 1979 - CERTIFICATE PROGRAM, PRICE WATERHOUSE AND COMPANY Productivity Improvement Techniques NOVEMBER 1981 - ~TATIoNAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE, UNR'ERSITY OF NEVADA -41 &NO Certificate Program in Court Management - Managing Delay NOVEMBER 1983 - NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, LEESBURG: VIRGINIA Course work - The Intergovernmental Challenge Cynthia lV. Curry . . SPECIAL APPOINTMENTS DECEMBER 1996 - J~E 1998 - GUBE%,UATORI.;U. APPOLXT~~XEXT Member and Vice Chairperson of the Governor's Emergency Financial Oversight Board to oversee the fiscal affairs of the City of Miami; and Chair of the Estimating Conference Cornmi ttee. MAY 1998 - OCTOBER 1998 - fiIL-tn.11-DADE COUIS'rY RlAYORAL APPOIKTMEKT PROJECT DIRECTOR FOR EMPO\VERR.IENT ZOKE - ROUND 11 - APPLICATIOX DEVELOPMENT Provided lead coordinatio~t for the development of the successful application for Federal Empowerment Zone designation AWARDS & RECOGNrflON * President's Award for Distinguished Service, Florida InternationaI University, 1999 0 \.170rnan of Impact Award, Miami-Dade County - 1999 0 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Service Award, Florida International University - 1 999 Award for Outstanding Achievement and Service to the Community, Latin Builders Association, 1999 Miami-Dade's Superstars Award - honoring Miami-Dade's most successful and influential corporate, business, and community leaders for their personal and professional contributions to the South Florida Community, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation - 1998 Recognition for Accomplishments and Commitment for the Betterment of all People in Broward County, 100 Black Men of Broward County, Inc. - 1998 Award for Outstanding Contribution and Service, The Black Business Association - 1998 Certificate of Appreciation for work in Srnalf Business Development, Greater Miami Chamber of Comnerce - 1998 Recognition for Outstanding Achievement in Business and Finance, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority - Miami Alumni Chapter - 1998 Ciean Sweep Award, Faculty Senate, Florida International University - 1997 Mary McLeod Bethune Award, Recognition for Civic Involven~ent - 1997 BEA Service to Community Award, Flu Black Employees Association - 1997 Certificate of Appreciation for Dedication to Women in Leadership, Florida Institute of Government at FIU - 1997 Award for Service and Dedication to the FIU Student Body and to the Student Government, FIU Student Government Council - 1997 Service Award for Support of Access Issues for Students and Employees with Disabilities, FIU Disabled Students Association and the University Access and Equity Committee - 1997 Pioneer Award, In the Company of Women - 1997 Certificate of Award for Outstanding Service in the Area of Afinnative Action and Equal Opportunity Florida International University - 1996 Cynthia W. Cuny 0 National Public Senrice Leadership Award Recipient - National Forum for Black Public Administrators, 1995 * Award of Excellence, Federation of Black Employees - 1994 Up and Comers Award - Outstanding Achievement in Government - 1990 (Presented by the South Florida Business Journal and Price Waterhouse) Award of Acllievement, The Farnily Christian Association of America, Inc. - 1989 Certificate of Award for Outstanding Accomplishments in Public Administration - 1988 Outstanding Chapter Senlice Award (National Forum for Black Public Administrators - South Florida Chapter PTFBPA-SFC) - 1987 Young Professional Administrator of the Year, American Society of Public Administration - 1984 Member, Orange Bowi Committee Member, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Gamma Zeta Omega Member, New Birth Baptist Church Member, Board of Directors, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People @!AACP), Miami-Dade Branch REFEREKCES AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST RESOLUTIONS TO BE SUBMITTED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A resolution approving an amendment to the lease (use) agreement for municipal parking spaces adjacent to North Beach Elementary (NBE) for faculty and staff use. Key Intended Outcome Supported: [.~aintain or Improve Traffic Flow. Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): 1 74% of residents and 72% of businesses rate the availabilitv of ~arkina across the Citv as too little or much too little. I I Availability of parking was one of the changes residents identified to Gake Miami each better to live, work or play. I Issue: Should the City Commission approve an extensionlamendments to the lease agreement with the school board for faculty and staff parking of North Beach Elementary permits? Item SummarylRecommendation: On October 18.2000. the Mavor and Commission a~~roved a lease aareement with Miami-Dade Countv 1 Public schools (MDCPS) pr6viding seventy-five (75j parking spaces Tor North Beach Elementary (NBE) faculty and staff at a discounted parking rate. The leased parking spaces have been serving as replacement parking for faculty and staff of NBE. The existing lease agreement provides for the following: Twenty-four (24) dedicated parking spaces along 42" Street at no charge; twenty-four (24) dedicated parking spaces in the northern row of the surface lot on 42" Street at a 50% of the monthly rate during peak season; and twenty-seven (27) parking spaces in the 42nd Street parking garage at 50% of the monthly rate during peak season. (Please note thaf NBE has never invoked the use of the twenty-seven (27) parking spaces in the 4Pd Street Garage).The term of the lease is five (5) years, with five (5) year extension options, upon the mutual consent of the parties. MDCPS is requesting to amend the lease agreement as follows: (1) The total number of parking spaces available to the NBE shall be reduced from 48 to 30, and shall consist of 15 parking spaces along 42"d Street, and 15 dedicated parking spaces in the City's surface parking lot on 42nd Street, as each term is defined in the Agreement.; (2) The City acknowledges and agrees that MDCPS has extended the term of this Agreement for the five year term commencing July 23, 201 1 and ending July 22, 2016. (3) The rental rate shall increase from $30 to $35 per parking space per month for the 15 surface lot parking spaces, resulting in an effective rental rate of $3,150 per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments of $262.50. (4) A new Article XXVl is added to read as follows: "Legal Fees and Court Costs - In the event of any litigation between the parties under this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for its own attorney's fees and court costs through trials and appellate levels. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. (5) The attached Exhibit "A" shall replace the original Exhibit "A" to the Agreement. (6) All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Administration has reviewed the proposed amendments and has deemed them to be in the best interest of the City and NBE faculty and staff. Adopt the Resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: Financial Information: I I City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: ( Saul Frances, ext. 6483 Source of Funds: m OBPl Financial Impact Summary: I 2 Total Amount Account Approved MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miarnibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: City Manager Jorge M. Gonzalez w DATE: November 17,2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE USE AGREEMENT WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DATED OCTOBER 18,2000, PROVIDING PARKING SPACES FOR NORTH BEACH ELEMENTARY FACULTY AND STAFF; SAID AMENDMENT REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE BOARD TO 30; APPROVING THE NEXT FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT, COMMENCING ON JULY 23, 2011, AND EXPIRING ON JULY 22,2016; AMENDING THE ANNUAL RENT PAID BY THE BOARD TO THE ClTY FROM $4,320.00 TO $3,150.00 (OR FROM $360.00 PER MONTH, TO $262.50 PER MONTH); AND ADDING A NEW ARTICLE ENTITLED, "LEGAL FEES AND COURT COSTS". ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS On October 18,2000, the Mayor and Commission approved a lease agreement with Miami- Dade County Public Schools (MDCPS) providing seventy-five (75) parking spaces for North Beach Elementary faculty and staff at a discounted parking rate. At the time, NBE expanded their campus which led to the loss of their on-site parking for faculty and staff. The leased parking spaces have since been serving as replacement parking for faculty and staff of NBE. The existing lease agreement provides for the following: 1. Twenty-four (24) dedicated parking spaces along 42nd Street at no charge; twenty- four (24) dedicated parking spaces in the northern row of the surface lot on 42nd Street at a 50% of the monthly rate during peak season; and twenty-seven (27) parking spaces in the 42" Street parking garage at 50% of the monthly rate during peak season. (Please note that NBE has never invoked the use of the twenty-seven (27) parking spaces in the 4Pd Street Garage). 2. The term of the lease is five (5) years, with five (5) year extension options, upon the mutual consent of the parties and subject to review of the parking rates based on actual usage realized at the garage and surface parking lot. MDCPS is requesting to amend the lease agreement as follows: The total number of parking spaces available to the NBE shall be reduced from 48 to 30, and shall consist of 15 parking spaces along 42nd Street at no charge (pursuant November 17,2010 Cify Commission Memorandum NBE Parking Space Lease Amendment Page 2 of 2 to the lease agreement), and 15 dedicated parking spaces in the City's surface parking lot on 42nd Street, at the approved 50% discount, as each term is defined in the Agreement. The City acknowledges and agrees that MDCPS has extended the term of this Agreement for the five year term commencing July 23, 201 1 and ending July 22, 2016. a The rental rate shall increase from $30 to $35 per parking space per month which is a 50% discount of the current monthly parking permit rate of $70. This discounted rate shall be applied to the 15 surface lot parking spaces, resulting in an effective rental rate of $3,150 for the six month period of November lSf to April 3ofh each year; however, it shall be payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments of $262.50. a A new Article XXVl is added to read as follows: "Legal Fees and Court Costs - In the event of any litigation between the parties under this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for its own attorney's fees and court costs through trials and appellate levels. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. The attached Exhibit "A" shall replace the original Exhibit "A" to the Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: The Administration has reviewed the proposed amendments and has deemed them to be in the best interest of the City as well as the faculty and staff of North Beach Elementary. The reduction of leased parking spaces from a total of 75 parking spaces to 30 parking spaces will provide additional parking availability in the area; the monthly rate shall increase from $30 to $35 (50% discount of the current monthly rate of $70) per space per month; and additional language shall be inserted clarifytng each party's responsibilities for legal fees and court costs in the event of any litigation. Lastly, all other terms and conditions shall remain in effect. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and Commission approve the proposed amendments to the lease agreement with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in order to continue providing parking for North Beach Elementary faculty and staff. In addition, the proposed amendments provide fora reduction in the total number of parking spaces leased from 75 parking spaces to 30 parking spaces; an increase in the monthly parking rate from $30 to $35; and additional provisions providing for each party being responsible for their legal fees and court costs in the event of any litigation, Exhibit "A" is replaced with an updated version, and all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in effect. JMGIJGGISF T:\AGENDAEOl O\Novemberl7201 O\ConsentWBEParkingSpaceLeaseAmendmendment.me.doc EXHIBIT "A" Metered Parking LEGEND (Total of 30 Parking Spaces) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE USE AGREEMENT WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DATED OCTOBER 18, 2000, PROVIDING PARKING SPACES FOR NORTH BEACH ELEMENTARY FACULTY AND STAFF; SAID AMENDMENT REDUCING THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE BOARD TO 30; APPROVING THE NEXT FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT, COMMENCING ON JULY 23, 2011, AND EXPIRING ON JULY 22, 2016; AMENDING THE ANNUAL RENT PAID BY THE BOARD TO THE ClTY FROM $4,320.00 TO $3,150.00 (OR FROM $360.00 PER MONTH, TO $262.50 PER MONTH); AND ADDING A NEW ARTICLE ENTITLED, "LEGAL FEES AND COURT COSTS". WHEREAS, on October 18, 2000, the Mayor and Commission approved Resolution No. 2000-24124, authorizing a Use Agreement with the School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida (the Board), for an initial five (5) year term, with subsequent extension options of five (5) years each (subject to mutual consent of the parties), for the Board's use of parking spaces for faculty and staff of North Beach Elementary; and WHEREAS, the Board and the City wish to extend the Use Agreement for another five year term, commencing on July 23, 2011, and ending on July 22, 2016, and, concurrent therewith, also wish to amend the Agreement, as follows: The total number of parking spaces available to Board reduced to 30, and shall consist of 15 metered parking spaces along 42"d Street, and 15 dedicated parking spaces in the municipal surface parking lot on 42" Street; The rental rate shall decrease from four thousand three hundred twenty dollars ($4,320.00) per year, to three thousand one hundred fifty dollars ($3,150.00) per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments of two hundred sixty two dollars and fifty cents ($262.50); and A new section, entitled "Legal Fees and Court Costs," shall be added to Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby approve a First Amendment to the Use Agreement with the School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida, dated October 18, 2000, providing parking spaces for North Beach Elementary Faculty and Staff; said amendment reducing the number of parking spaces available for use by the Board to 30; approving the next five (5) year extension of the agreement, commencing on July 23, 201 1, and expiring on July 22, 2016; and amending the annual rent paid by the Board to the City from $4,320.00 to $3,150.00 (or from $360.00 per month, to $262.50 per month); and adding a new article entitled, "Legal Fees and Court Costs". PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2010 ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION FIRST AMENDMENT TO USE AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO USE AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made and entered into this day of 201 0, by and between THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as the "LESSEE"), and the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "LESSOR). RECITALS WHEREAS, the LESSOR and LESSEE entered into that certain Use Agreement, dated October 18, 2000 (the "Agreement"), for LESSEE'S use of the parking facilities at North Beach Elementary School ("SCHOOL"), located at 4100 Prairie Avenue; and WHEREAS, LESSOR and LESSEE hereby consent to a renewal of the Agreement for another five (5) year term, commencing on July 23,201 1, and ending on July 22,2016, subject to the amendments set forth herein, which amendments shall be effective as of July 23, 201 1. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the conditions and covenants hereinafter contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Article I of the Agreement, entitled "Premises to Be Leased", is hereby amended, as follows: LESSOR hereby leases to LESSEE and LESSEE hereby leases from LESSOR the following described facilities, totaling thirtv (30) parking spaces, hereinafter collectively called the "DEMISED PREMISES," lying and being in the City of Miami Beach, County of Miami- Dade, State of Florida, and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof, to wit: Fifteen (1 5) dedicated metered parking spaces along meinafter called "METERED PARKING"); and 0 Fifteen (1 5) dedicated parking spaces in the last row of the surface lot on 42nd Street, (hereinafter called "SURFACE LOT"). Page 1 of 3 3. Paragraph 1 of Article IV of the Agreement, entitled "Consideration," is hereby amended, as follows: Other than as stipulated in Article V, LESSEE does hereby covenant and agree to pay LESSOR, and LESSOR does hereby covenant and agree to accept from LESSEE, as full consideration for the use and occupancy of the DEMISED PREMISES, the sum of V THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLAR ($3,150) per year, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments of V.EC SCXT !3QUAM @3@40) TWO HUNDRED SIXTY TWO DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS ($262.50). 1 $30 a*: Tkse4a4 bo nc &ixg&wk LES-TEW 4. A new Article XXVl is added to read as follows: LEGAL FEES AND COURT COSTS In the event of any litigation between the parties under this Asreement, each party shall be res~onsible for its own attorney's fees and court costs through trials and appellate levels. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement." 5. Exhibit "A of the Agreement is replaced with a new Exhibit "A as attached and incorporated to this Amendment. 6. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Page 2 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective and duly authorized officers the day and year first hereinabove written. LESSOR: LESSEE: THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Matti Herrera Bower, MAYOR Attest: Alberto M. Carvalho Superintendent of Schools Robert Parcher, ClTY CLERK WitnessISignature Print Name WitnessISignature Print Name Underscore denotes new language denotes deleted language APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION Page 3 of 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: Resolution: Approval of a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for the Single-Family Property at 2740 North Bay Road. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Designation and retention of historically significant properties. Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): In the 2009 Survey, all respondents were asked to indicate if they felt the effort put forth by the City of Miami Beach on historic preservation was too little, too much or about the right amount. 77.1 % of respondents reported that the effort put forth by the City of Miami Beach on historic preservation is "about the right amount." Issue: The Administration is requesting that the Mayor and City Commission consider the proposed resolution, which would approve a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for a single- family property located at 2740 North Bay Road. Item Summary/Recommendation: The Administration recommends approval of the resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: On May 11,201 0, the City's Historic Preservation Board held a public hearing and voted unanimously (7 to 0) to approve the individual designation of the single-family residence at 2740 North Bay Road as an historic structure; and At the same public hearing, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and unanimously approved (7 to 0) the proposed improvements to the subject single-family property and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness, subject to certain conditions indicated in the Final Order of the Board. On September 14,2010, the Historic Preservation Board held a public hearing and voted unanimously (5 to 0, 2 absent) in favor of recommending that the Mayor and City Commission approve a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for qualifying improvements to the historically designated single-family property at 2740 North Bay Road. Financial Information: I source of Amount Account 1 Funds: I I I Financial Impact Summary: I 1 2 OBPl City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: William H. Cary, Assistant Planning Director; Debbie Tackett, Senior Planner. 1 3 Total MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17,201 0 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING A PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY PROPERTY AT 2740 NORTH BAY ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE TO GRANT THIS TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE CITY'S PORTION OF AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES FOR QUALIFYING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT AND COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION The Administration is requesting that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the proposed resolution, thereby approving a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for a single-family property located at 2740 North Bay Road. HISTORIC SINGLE-FAMILY AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION On December 8, 2004, the City of Miami Beach enacted legislation that authorizes an exemption for its portion of ad valorem taxes for improvements to historically designated single-family homes (Sections 118-600 to 118-612 of the Miami Beach City Code). This legislation allows for the City's portion of property taxes to be "frozen" at the rate they were assessed before qualifying improvements are made to an historic single-family home for a period of ten (10) years. The "freezing" is accomplished by removing from the assessment the incremental value added by the qualifying improvements. Only the incremental value of the qualifying improvements shall be "frozen" for the ten year period. Qualifying improvements are the result of restoration, renovation, rehabilitation and/or compatible additions to an historic single-family property. In order for an improvement to qualify for an exemption, the improvement must be determined by the Historic Preservation Board and City Commission to be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 1 18-564 of the Miami Beach City Code. However, the Miami-Dade County Commission Memorandum of November 17,2010 Historic Single-Family Ad Valorem Tax Exemption 2740 North Bay Road Page 2 of 6 Property Appraiser's Office will make the final determination of whether an improvement qualifies for an exemption. The application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption is a two step process. The "Part 1 - Preconstruction Application" is normally submitted to the Planning Department prior to any construction or demolition for an eligible single-family property. The "Part 2 - Review of Completed Work" is submitted to the Planning Department upon substantial completion of the project. Upon submittal of a completed Part 1 - Preconstruction Application, the Planning Department will schedule the request for approval of Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption from the Historic Preservation Board at their next regularly scheduled meeting. The Board will review and make a recommendation to the City Commission to grant or deny an application for tax exemption. The Planning Department will transmit the request for approval of Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption, together with the Part I - Preconstruction Application and the recommendations of the Historic Preservation Board and staff, for final consideration by the City Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. A majority vote of the City Commission is required to approve an application for tax exemption. For final approval of an Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption, the applicant must submit to the Planning Department the Part 2 - Review of Completed Work upon substantial completion of the project. A review will be conducted by Planning Department staff to determine whether or not the completed improvements are in compliance with the work approved by the City Commission in the Part 1 - Preconstruction Application. To qualify for a tax exemption, the property owner is required to enter into a covenant or agreement with the City guaranteeing that the character of the property and its qualifying improvements will be maintained during the period that the exemption is granted. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at 2740 North Bay Road on Lot 10 in Block 12 of "AMENDED PLAT OF SUNSET LAKE SUBDIVISON," according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 52, of the Public Records of Dade County, now known as Miami-Dade County, Florida, excepting the following described parcel of land: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Lot 10, in Block 12, at SUNSET LAKE SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded n Plat Book 8 at Page 52, of the Public Records of Dade County, now known as Miami-Dade County, Florida, said corner being in the Westerly line of North Bay Road at a distance of 80.1 feet South from the intersection of the Southerly line of West 29 Street and the Westerly line of North Bay Road, as measured along in said Block 12, for a distance of 258.75 feet more or less to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 10; thence Northeasterly for a distance of 241.88 feet more or less to a point in the Westerly said North Bay Road, said point being 25 feet South, as measured along the Westerly line of said North Bay Road, from the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 10; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said North Bay Road for a distance of 25 feet to the Point and Place of Beginning. EXISTING STRUCTURE Built in 1929 and designed by architect, August Geiger, the subject residence is a good example of the Mediterranean Revival style of architecture. The distinctive two-story Commission Memorandum of November 17,2010 Historic Single-Family Ad Valorem Tax Exemption 2740 North Bay Road Page 3 of 6 residence is characterized by an asymmetric street fa~ade, complex massing, multiple barrel tile gable and rounded-arched front entry door. Many well defined original architectural features of the house add artistic value and character to the structure and the neighborhood. The carefully executed design was clearly done with the highest regard to the character of the house and the neighborhood in which it rests, as evidenced by the careful attention to detail expressed throughout the design, both on the exterior and interior. BACKGROUND On May 11, 2010, the Historic Preservation Board approved a request by the applicant for the individual designation of the single-family property at 2740 North Bay Road as an historic structure. The Board also voted to approve a request for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the partial demolition, renovation and restoration of the existing home and the construction of a new addition. On September 14, 2010, the Historic Preservation Board held a public hearing and voted unanimously (5 to 0, 2 absent) in favor of recommending that the Mayor and City Commission approve a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for qualifying improvements to the historically designated single-family property at 2740 North Bay Road. SCOPE OF PROJECT The a~~licant is reauestinq that the Historic Preservation Board recommend approval of an apbiication for ~istoric~d Valorem Tax Exemption for the single-family property at 2740 North Bay Road. Staff recommends the improvements to the historic residence and site indicated below. A. Exterior Architectural Features (For clarification, staff identifies qualifying additions to an historic home to be which are fully attached to the existing house, are necessary to bring the existing structure up to a level of livability more comparable to new surrounding homes, and do not remove or adversely alter significant historic architectural features.) I. A single-story, 191 square foot addition will be constructed on the ground level of the northwest side of the existing home. This addition will contain a portion of the enlarged kitchen. 2. A second-story, 2,330 square foot addition will be constructed above the existing, single-story attached, three car garage at the northeast corner of the property. This second story addition will contain a bedroom, bathroom and playroom. 3. A 35 square foot covered balcony will be constructed at the northeast portion of the home at the second level. 5. A 412 square foot rear covered terrace will be constructed on the ground level at the west side of the home. 6. The original arched wood door made up of wood spindles located at the east elevation will be retained and restored. Commission Memorandum of November 17,2010 Historic Single-Family Ad Valorem Tax Exemption 2740 North Bay Road Page 4 of 6 7. All existing windows will be removed and replaced with impact resistant windows to match the original window configuration. A new structural concrete perimeter frame will be installed in order to anchor the new impact windows into the existing walls. 8. The existing chimney located at the west side of the home will be retained and restored. B. Interior Architectural Features (The interior features indicated below may not be considered by the Miami-Dade County Tax Appraiser to be qualifying for the tax exemption.) I. The original wood colonnade which spans the width of the living room from east to west will be retained and restored. 2. The original balconet (including the railings and French doors) located along the second floor hallway which overlooks the living room will be retained and restored. 3. The original carved keystone fireplace mantel located within the living room will be retained and restored. 4. New mechanical and electrical systems will be added throughout the structure to ensure energy efficiency compliance with current code and standards. 5. The existing ground level, single story 898 square foot garage will be converted into air-conditioned habitable space. C. Landscape Features (The landscape and site improvements indicated below are not considered to be qualifying for the tax exemption.) 1. The existing swimming pool will be retained and repaired and the pool deck and patio will be resurfaced with a new paving material. 2. A single-story 294 square foot gazebo at the western portion of the property will be constructed. FISCAL IMPACT According to the applicant, the estimated cost of the entire project is $3,550,000 and the value of ihe proposed qualifying improvements for the subject single-family property is $3,125,000. The project commencement date is scheduled for November 2010 and the estimated project completion date is June 2012. Please note that the revenue implication calculation provided below is a rough approximation. It assumes that the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office will not reduce the actual square footage of the additions to adjusted square footage. It Commission Memorandum of November 17,2010 Historic Single-Family Ad Valorem Tax Exemption 2740 North Bay Road Page 5 of 6 assumes that the City's millage rate, the building market value, as well as the building class and grade value will remain the same. It is also based solely on the estimated value of the new additions and not to any repairs to the historic residence. The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office determined in 2009 that the subject property has an adjusted square footage of 6,119 and a building value of $932,948. The lot size is approximately 28,245 square feet with a land value of $3,758,582. The Property Appraiser's Office advised that the subject property has an effective building value per adjusted square foot of $152 which is based upon its building class and grade. According to the applicant, the proposed actual square footage of the qualifying building additions for the site is approximately 3419 square feet. Then the estimated value of the proposed increase in qualifying square footage only, would be $521,056. This figure does not include any other qualifying improvements that the County Tax Appraiser may determine to add value to the property. The County Tax Appraiser may determine certain improvements to the existing structure to be maintenance and therefore not adding building value to the property. In FY 201 011 1, the adopted millage rate for the City of Miami Beach is 6.2155. For the sole purpose of providing an estimated savings to the property owner (based on solely on the square footage of qualifying additions), we will assume there will be no change in millage rate over the ten year period in which the exemption is granted. When using the estimated 6.2155 millage rate for FY 2001 011 1, the applicant will save annually approximately $3240 from Miami Beach's portion of property taxes. Again, this calculation is a rough estimate of the revenue implication to the City due to many variables. ANALYlSlS Staff commends the applicant for the retention and designation of the single family home, designed by August Geiger and constructed in 192% An earlier proposal for the subject property was previously reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board, which substantially demolished the majority of the existing historic residence, including all of the roofs in order to raise the entire structure up to the minimum flood elevation. In reconsidering this proposal, the owner became concerned with the loss of the remarkable design identity and intimate character of the home, and instead met with staff to seek its designation. While staff is supportive of the application, there are certain improvements listed by the applicant which staff does not consider to be qualifying. These improvements either remove or adversely alter significant architectural features of the historic home, are not restorative in nature and are not necessary to bring the existing structure up to a level of livability more comparable to newer surrounding homes. Staff has brought these recommendations to the attention of the applicant during the initial review of the application. Staff does not recommend the following improvements to be qualifying for the tax abatement: 1. A second-story, 328 square foot addition will be constructed at the west side of the home consisting of a sitting area and terrace with hot tub located Commission Memorandum of November 17,2010 Historic Single-Family Ad Valorem Tax Exemption 2740 North Bay Road Page 6 of 6 adjacent to the already generous master suite of rooms. 2. A 39 square foot vestibule and AIC closets will be added at the east side of home which will require the removal of original fenestration and exterior wall at the primary fa~ade. 3. A 988 square foot loggia will be added at the east side of the home at the ground level which will significantly alter the original primary facade of the historic structure and which will remove significant architectural features including the original front entrance door. 4. A 188 square foot new covered porch will be added to the ground floor at the east side of the home adjacent to the existing courtyard and original entrance porch. This will alter the original significant entrance courtyard area. 5. A 167 square foot covered terrace will be constructed on the second level of the proposed master suite at the west side of the home providing a new sundeck above the new breezeway and requires the removal and replacement of significant architectural features of the primary fa~ade. 6. A single story, 864 square foot garage will be partially attached to the east side at the primary facade of the home at the ground level. The existing home already incorporates a 3 car garage which is proposed to be converted into multiple bedrooms and staff quarters on two levels. The applicant is to be greatly commended for the retention and restoration of the subject home. It is very important that the current owner has chosen to preserve and expand this historic home, rather than to demolish and replace it. The historically significant home is an asset to the neighborhood, and as such staff recommends approval of the tax exemption application. RECOMMENDATION In view of the foregoing analysis, and consistency with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564 of the Miami Beach City Code, staff recommends in favor of the application for Miami Beach Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for the single-family residence at 2740 North Bay Road. Rgc JMG:JGG:RGL:WHC:DJT T:\AGENDA\2010\Novernber 17\Consent\2740 N Bay Rd-SF Ad Valorem-Mema.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING A PRECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY PROPERTY AT 2740 NORTH BAY ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE TO GRANT THIS TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE CITY'S PORTION OF AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES FOR QUALIFYING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT AND COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission have deemed it in the best interest and welfare of the City of Miami Beach ("City") to provide financial incentives for the retention and rehabilitation of architecturally and historically significant single-family homes in Miami Beach; and WHEREAS, on December 8, 2004, the Miami Beach City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2004-3469 that authorizes an exemption for the City's portion of ad valorem taxes if qualifying improvements are made to historically designated single-family homes; and WHEREAS, Claude Dray, the owner of real property located at 2740 North Bay Road (Lot 10 in Block 12 of "AMENDED PLAT OF SUNSET LAKE SUBDIVISON," according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 52, of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida), submitted requests to the City's Planning Department for the following: a) designation of the property as an historic structure, b) a Certificate of Appropriateness, and c) an Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for the subject property; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2010, the City's Historic Preservation Board held a public hearing and voted unanimously (7 to 0) to approve the individual designation of the single-family residence at 2740 North Bay Road as an historic structure [Exhibit "A"]; and WHEREAS, at the same public hearing, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and unanimously approved (7 to 0) the proposed improvements to the subject single-family property and granted a Certificate of Appropriateness, subject to certain conditions indicated in the Final Order of the Board [Exhibit "B"]; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 2010, the Historic Preservation Board held a public hearing and voted unanimously (5 to 0, 2 absent) in favor of recommending that the Mayor and City Commission approve a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for qualifying improvements to the historically designated single-family property at 2740 North Bay Road; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board has certified that the subject single-family property for which an exemption is requested is eligible and satisfies Section 118-602(a) of the Miami Beach City Code; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board has determined that the proposed improvements to the subject single-family property are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Certificate of Appropriateness criteria in Section 11 8-564 of the Miami Beach City Code, in accordance with Section 1 18-602(b); and WHEREAS, the City's Planning Department has recommended that this request for a tax exemption for the subject single-family property be granted, subject to all of the conditions set forth herein and the Historic Preservation Board Order (Exhibit "B"). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that a Preconstruction Application for Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption for the subject single-family property at 2740 North Bay Road be approved, subject to the conditions of the Historic Preservation Board Order (Exhibit "B") and the following conditions: 1. Scope of Tax Exem~tion. The exemption shall apply to one hundred (100) percent of the assessed value of all qualifying improvements to the single-family property that result from restoration, renovation, rehabilitation, and/or compatible additions. The exemption applies only to taxes levied by the City. The exemption does not apply to taxes levied for the payment of bonds or to taxes authorized by a vote of the electors pursuant to the Miami Beach City Code or the Florida Constitution. The exemption does not apply to personal property or to properties located within a community redevelopment area. The Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office will make the final determination of whether an improvement qualifies for an exemption. 2. Amroved Qualifvina Improvements. The qualifying improvements to the subject single- family property delineated below are considered to be eligible for the tax exemption, as submitted to and approved by the City's Historic Preservation Board. a. A single-story, 191 square foot addition will be constructed on the ground level of the northwest side of the existing home. This addition will contain a portion of the enlarged kitchen. b. A second-story, 2,330 square foot addition will be constructed above the existing, single-story attached, three car garage at the northeast corner of the property. This second story addition will contain a bedroom, bathroom and playroom. c. A 35 square foot covered balcony will be constructed at the northeast portion of the home at the second level. d. A 412 square foot rear covered terrace will be constructed on the ground level at the west side of the home. e. The original arched wood door made up of wood spindles located at the east elevation will be retained and restored. f. All existing windows will be removed and replaced with impact resistant windows to match the original window configuration. A new structural concrete perimeter frame will be installed in order to anchor the new impact windows into the existing walls. g. The existing chimney located at the west side of the home will be retained and restored. h. The original wood colonnade which spans the width of the living room from east to west will be retained and restored. i. The original balconet (including the railings and French doors) located along the second floor hallway which overlooks the living room will be retained and restored. j. The original carved keystone fireplace mantel located within the living room will be retained and restored. k. New mechanical and electrical systems will be added throughout the structure to ensure energy efficiency compliance with current code and standards. I. The existing ground level, single story 898 square foot garage will be converted into air-conditioned habitable space. 3. Duration of Tax Exemption. The exemption shall take effect on the January IS' following substantial completion of the improvements. The exemption shall remain in effect for ten (I 0) years. The duration of ten (1 0) years shall continue regardless of any change in the authority of the City to grant such exemptions or any changes in ownership of the property. 4. Required Covenant. The property owner shall enter into a covenant with the City for the term for which the exemption is granted. The covenant shall be form approved by the City Attorney and shall require that the character of the property, and the qualifying improvements to the property, be maintained during the period that the exemption is granted. Before the effective date of the exemption, the owner of the property shall have the covenant recorded in the official records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. The covenant shall be binding on the current property owner, transferees, and their heirs, successors, and assigns. Violation of the covenant shall result in the property owner being required to pay the differences between the total amount of taxes which would have been due in March in each of the previous years in which the covenant was in effect had the property not received the exemption and the total amount of taxes actually paid in those years, plus interest on the difference calculated as provided in F.S. § 212.12(3). 5. Buildina Permit Plans and Construction. Building permit plans must accurately reflect all improvements approved by the Historic Preservation Board and City Commission in the Preconstruction Application and architectural drawings for the single-family property. All work on site must be in accordance with the building permit plans. 6. Amendments. All proposed amendments to the approved application and permit plans must be reviewed and approved prior to the completion of the improvements. Minor amendments to permit plans may be approved by the Planning Department provided such amendments are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Certificate of Appropriateness criteria in Section 118-564 of the Miami Beach City Code. Major amendments to the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Board. Completion of Work. An application must complete all work within 30 months following the date of approval by the city commission. An approval for ad valorem tax exemption shall expire if the building permit for the approved work is not issued within the timeframes specified under the corresponding certificate of appropriateness, or if a full building permit issued for the approved work should expire or become null and void, for any reason. The approval for ad valorem tax exemption shall be suspended if such permit is issued but the property owner has not submitted a final request for review of completed work within 30 months following the date of approval by the city commission. The Historic Preservation Board, for good cause shown, may extend the time for completion of a substantial improvement for a period not to exceed two years from the completion date in the original approval by the city commission, or such lesser time as may be prescribed by the board. 8. Review of Completed Work. The applicant shall submit a request for Review of Completed Work to the Planning Department no less than 30 calendar days prior to the effective date of expiration of approval by the City Commission, as may be extended by the Historic Preservation Board. The Planning Department shall conduct a review to determine whether or not the completed improvements are in compliance with the work approved by the City Commission, including any approved amendments. If the Planning Department determines that the work is in compliance, the final request for Review of Completed Work shall be approved and issued in writing to the applicant. If the Planning Department determines that the work as completed is not in compliance, the applicant will be advised in writing that the final request for Review of Completed Work has been denied. A written summary of the reasons for the determination will be provided, including recommendations concerning the changes to the proposed work necessary to bring it into compliance. The applicant may file an appeal of the decision of the Planning Department within 15 days of such decision. The appeal shall be in writing and shall be to the Historic Preservation Board and shall set forth the factual and legal bases for the appeal. 9. Notice of Approval to the ProoertV A~praiser. Upon the receipt of a certified copy of the recorded restrictive covenant, the Planning Department shall transmit a copy of the approved request for Review of Completed Work, the exemption covenant, and the resolution of the City Commission approving the final application and authorizing the tax exemption to the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office. Final verification of substantial completion of the improvements shall be determined by the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office. If final verification of substantial completion and approval are given by the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office, the exemption shall take effect on the January ISt following substantial completion of the improvements. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ,2010. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECURN: n T:\AGENDA\2010\0ctober 2AConsentE740 N Bay Rd-SF Ad Valorem-Reso.doc EXHIBIT 'A' SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 2740 North Bay Road HISTORIC STRUCTURE DESIGNATION REPORT PREPAREDBY CITY OF MIAMI BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT DESIGN, PRESERVATION & NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING DIVISION Richard G. Lorber, AICP, LEED AP, Acting Director, Planning Department William H. Cary, Assistant Planning Director Thomas R. Mooney, AICP, Design and Preservation Manager Debbie Tackett, Senior Planner CITY OF MIAMI BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Jeff Donnelly, Chair Erika Brigham Henry Lares Jo Manning Simon Nemni Norberto Rosenstein David Wieder May 11,2010 Adopted on May 11,201 0 (HPB File No. 7132) EXHIBIT 'A' I. REQUEST The applicant, Delphine Dray, is requesting that the Historic Preservation Board approve a request for the designation of an existing single-family home as an historic structure. II. DESIGNATION PROCESS The process of designation for historic structures is delineated in Section 11 8-591 (f) in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. An outline of this process is provided below: Ste~ One: An application for the individual designation of a single-family home as an historic structure is submitted by the property owner to the Planning Department for recommendation to the Historic Preservation Board. The Board will make a determination as to whether the single-family home may be designated as an historic structure based upon the requirements and criteria of Section 118-592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. Step Two: Upon receipt of a completed application package, the Planning Department prepares a Designation Report that will be presented to the Historic Preservation Board at a regularly scheduled meeting. The Designation Report is an historical and architectural analysis of the proposed historic structure. - -- . - Ste~ Three: The Designation Report is presented to the Historic Presemtion Board at a public hearing. If the Board finds that the proposed single-family designation application meets the criteria set forth in Section 1 18-592 of the Land Development Regulations in the City Code, it may formally adopt the single-family home as a local historic structure. No public hearing is required before the Planning Board or City Commission. Upon the designation of a single-family home as an historic structure, the structure is subject to the Certificate of Appropriateness requirements of Article X of the Land Development Regulations in the City Code, with the exception of the interior areas of the structure (which are not be subject to such regulations). Ill. RELATION TO ORDINANCE CRITERIA 1. In accordance with Section I1 8-592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, eligibilityfor designation is determined on the basis of compliance with the listed criteria set forth below. (a) The Historic Preservation Board shall have the authority to recommend that properties be designated as historic buildings, historic structures, historic improvements, historic landscape features, historic interiors (architecturally significant public portions only), historic sites or historic districts if they are significant in the historical, architectural, cultural, aesthetic or archeological heritage of the city, the county, state or nation. Such properties shall possess an integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association and meet at least one (1 ) of the following criteria: (1) Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the city, the county, state or nation; (2) Association with the lives of persons significant in the city's past history; EXHIBIT 'A' (3) Embody the distinctive characteristics of an historical period, architectural or design style or method of construction; (4) Possesses high artistic values; (5) Represent the work of a master, serve as an outstanding or representative work of a master designer, architect or builder who contributed to our historical, aesthetic or architectural heritage; (6) Have yielded, or are likely to yield information important in pre-history or history; (7) Be listed in the National Register of Historic Places; (8) Consist of a geographically definable area that possesses a significant concentration of sites, buildings or structures united by historically significant past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development, whose components may lack individual distinction. (b) A building, structure (including the public portions of the interior), improvement or landscape feature may be designated historic even if it has been altered if the alteration is reversible and the most significant architectural elements are intact and repairable. 2. The single-family residence at 2740 North Bay Road is eligible for designation as an historic structure as it complies with the criteria as specified in Section 118-592 in the Land Development Regulations of the City Code outlined above. Staff finds that the proposed Historic Sinale Family Home located at 4343 North Bay Road possesses integritv of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association for the following reasons: Satisfied; The construction of the home located at 2740 North Bay Road in 1929, at fhe end of the Florida Boom and the same year of the stock market crash, was clearly significant in the successful development history of the City of Miami Beach. The design and construction of the home brought a architectural style of high aesthetic appeal and stature to the neighborhood, as well as highly prominent local architect, August Geiger, who was qualified to execute it. The proposed historic home still possess the integrity of its original location at2740 North Bay Road, despite more than eighty years of hurricanes, storms, and economic crises. Further, the original building still retains many of its historic materials, details, and workmanship as well as the feeling of its late 1920s period of construction in Miami Beach. (a) Staff finds the proposed historic site to be eligible for historic designation and in conformance with the designation criteria for the following reasons: (1) Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the city, the county, state or nation; The single family residence located at 2740 North Bay Road, built on the brink of the Great Depression, is a last gasp of the Florida Boom of the EXHIBIT 'A' 1920~~ when wealthy northern industrialists flooded into Florida, building their palatial winter residences and investing in real estate speculation. Specific to Miami Beach, this house was an early component of Carl Fisher's Sunset Lake Subdivision. (2) Association with the lives of persons significant in the city's past history; The original owner Val Duitenhofer Jr. was not only a well known industrialist from Cincinnati, Ohio, but also became a prominent investor in properties in Miami and Miami Beach. (3) Embodv the distinctive characteristics of an historical period. architectural or desian stvle or method of construction; This house is a good example of the Mediterranean Revival style of architecture, the predominant style in Florida in the 1920s. Some of its characteristics seen here are the clay barrel tile gable roofs, round-arched doorways, balconies, decorative medallions and door surrounds. The later garage addition was designed to blend compatibly with the original house. (4) Possesses high artistic values; Valued at $30,000 in 1929 and designed by a promitlent architect, this house was of high-quality design and construction with many fine details, and built in an upper-class neighborhood. Represent the work of a master, serve as an outstandins or representative work of a master desianer, architect or builder who contributed to our historical, aesthetic or architectural heritaqe; August Geiger was one of the City's finest architects, favored by Carl Fisher himself. He designed many prominent buildings in Miami Beach from the 1910s through the 1940~~ although many have now been demolished. The Skinner brothers, who designed the garage addition, were well known for their work in Coral Gables, and later for their many civic buildings. They designed several Contributing buildings in Miami Beach's historic districts. (b) A buildina, structure (includina the public portions of the interior), improvement or landscape feature mav be desianated historic even if it has been altered if the alteration is reversible and the most sianificant architectural elements are intact and repairable. The single-family residence at 2740 North Bay Road maintains high degree of architectural integrity with limited modifications. Restoration and appropriate renovation can be successfully completed of this fine residence by careful analysis of on-site conditions and available historic documentation. EXHIBIT 'A' IV. DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES The subject property is located at 2740 North Bay Road on Lot 10 in Block 12 of "AMENDED PLAT OF SUNSET LAKE SUBDIVISON," according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 52, of the Public Records of Dade County, now known as Miami-Dade County, Florida, excepting the following described parcel of land: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Lot 10, in Block 12, at SUNSET LAKE SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded n Plat Book 8 at Page 52, of the Public Records of Dade County, now known as Miami-Dade County, Florida, said corner being in the Westerly line of North Bay Road at a distance of 80.1 feet South from the intersection of the Southerly line of West 29 Street and the Westerly line of North Bay Road, as measured along in said Block 12, for a distance of 258.75 feet more or less to the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 10; thence Northeasterly for a distance of 241.88 feet more or less to a point in the Westerly said North Bay Road, said point being 25 feet South, as measured along the Westerly line of said North Bay Road, from the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 10; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said North Bay Road for a distance of 25 feet to the Point and Place of Beginning. V. PRESENT OWNER The present owner of the subject property is ' VI. PRESENT USE The original and current use of the subject property is single-family residential. VII. PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT The subject property is located in the RS-2 or Residential Single-Family Zoning District. VIII. ARCHITECTURAL BACKGROUND Mediterranean Revival (circa mid-1 91 0s to early 1930s) Mediterranean Revival architecture was the "style of choice" for the first major land development period in Miami Beach. Its connotation of Mediterranean resort architecture, combining expressions of Italian, Moorish, North African, and Southern Spanish themes, was found to be an appropriate and commercially appealing image for the new Floridian seaside resort; it was a style that was simultaneously being used expansively in California and other areas of similar climate. During the mid-1 91 0s through the early 1930s, the style was frequently applied to hotels, apartment buildings, commercial structures, and single-family residences. Its architectural vocabulary was characterized by stucco walls, low-pitched terra cotta and historic Cuban tile roofs, arches, scrolled or tile capped parapet walls, and articulated door surrounds, sometimes utilizing Spanish Baroque decorative motifs and Classical elements. Feature detailing was occasionally executed in keystone or patterned ceramic tile. Application of the architectural vocabulary in Miami Beach ranged from sparing to modestly exuberant, and building massing varied from a simple rectangular form to stepped massing with recessed wall planes and tower-like corner features. Wooden casement or double- hung windows of several configurations provided additional detail to the facades. EXHIBIT 'A' 2740 North Bay Road The subject house occupies Lot 10 in Block 8 of the Sunset Lake Subdivision of Miami Beach, platted by developer Carl G. Fisher's Miami Beach Bay Shore Company in April of 1923. This is a waterfront lot on Sunset Lake that Fisher dredged in order to isolate rival Stephen A. Lynch's land, which became the Sunset Islands.' 2740 North Bay Road is one of two houses for which permits were issued on the same day, October 7, 1929 (shortly before the stock market crash), to the same owner, Valentine Duttenhofer Jr. The other house was located directly north of 2740 at 2760 North Bay Road, Lot 1 I in Block 8. Both residences were designed in the Mediterranean Revival style by architect August Geiger (see Biography following), each cost $30,000 to construct. Duttenhofer himself had a winter residence located on Lot 9 in Block 8 at 2700 North Bay Road, built in 1925. He was one of the many northern industrialists who contributed to the Florida Boom of the 1920s. In 1905, Valentine Duttenhofer Jr. (1 862-1 939), together with his younger brother John, founded the Val Duttenhofer's Sons Company, well known shoe manufacturers in Cincinnatti, 0hio.* Val Jr.'s purchase of the Clyde Court Apartments in Miami for $500,000 in the 1920s was "the largest all-cash sale in Miami up to that p~int."~ In later years his son Clifford owned both the Clyde Court and the Mildred Lee Apartments in Miami Beach (now demolished). Although the Florida Boom crashed after the 1926 hurricane, Duttenhofer continued to invest in building these two elegant homes in 1929. The subject house was occupied by James W. Eustis of Boston in the 1930s.~ August Geiger's plans for the residence were found on Microfilm #3292 in the City of Miami Beach Building Department records. The plans show an irregularly shaped, two-story house of reinforced concrete, with multiple gable roofs and one-story shed-roof elements. The front entry door, characterized by rounded arch and fan window, leads into a double-height living room and a loggia, also with rounded arches, overlooks Sunset Lake. The central section of the house has an east-west axis and contains a bedroom, stairway, kitchen, pantry, and dining room. The original garage is located at the north side of the property, set at an angle to the main house. The original plans clearly show barrel tile roofs, and the windows appear to be six-pane casement with wooden frame details. Other exterior features include decorative medallions on the roof gables; second story balconies on the front and rear, with wood spindle railings and masonry door-surrounds; and a similar wood-spindle gate into an open entry porch. An addition costing $2,500 is documented on the original Building Permit Card and plans for were located on Microfilm #9645. The addition was designed by brothers John and Coulton Skinner (see Biography following) and appears to be a one-story, three-car garage situated to the north of the main house. Its footprint can be seen in the 1952 plat map. When this new garage was constructed, the original attached garage was converted to living space. Later alterations to the residence documented on the Building Permit Card include the 1 Kleinberg, Miami Beach: A Histow, Centennial Press, 1966, p. 94. Google Books online; Cincinnatti. the Oueen City, vol. 4, pp. 214-215 Ballinger, Miami Millions; Franklin Press, 1936, p. 26. Stem, Along; Greater Miami's Sun-Sea-Ara; 1932. EXHIBIT 'A' installation of central air-conditioning and other interior work in 1976, and the addition of a swimming pool in 1987. While no archival photographs have been found to verify that the house and garage addition were built according to plan, site inspection of the building reveals that the property largely conforms to the plans by both Geiger and the Skinners, and most of the original features remain intact. Architect Biographies August Geiger (1888-1968) was from New Haven, Connecticut. He was educated at Boardman's Manual Training School, and by apprenticeship; he came to Miami in 1905 and became Florida's tenth registered architect. Geiger started his own practice in 191 1, and in his early career designed a number of bungalow residences, the Bulmer Apartments in Miami (demolished), the Miami City Hospital (now "the Alamo" at Jackson Memorial Hospital), and public schools at Homestead, Arch Creek and Dania. As a master of the Mediterranean Revival style with a strong Beaux-Arts influence, he became Miami Beach developer Carl Fisher's favorite architect, and designed both of Fisher's residences, one of which still stands at 501 0 North Bay Road. Other buildings he designed for Fisher include the 191 6 clubhouse for the Municipal Golf Course, now one of the oldest buildings in the City; the Lincoln Hotel (now demolished) and the Lincoln Building (now the Van Dyke) on Lincoln Road. His work also includes the Allison Hospital (later St. Francis) and the La Gorce Golf Clubhouse, both now demolished. From 1935 to 1948, Geiger worked as architect for the Dade County School Board, and in this capacity worked on the Ida Fisher High School at 141 0 Drexel Avenue, North Shore Elementary School at 71 1 4lSt Street, and Biscayne Bay Elementary School at 800 77" Street. His 1947 neoclassical-deco style Chase Federal Savings Bank Building at 1100 Lincoln Road has now been rehabilitated as a Banana Republic store. In Miami, Geiger designed the Woman's Club at 1737 North Bayshore Drive; the grand neoclassical Christian Science church at 1836 Biscayne Boulevard; and, in 1925, he was one of the architects of the Dade County Courthouse on Flagler Street. In addition to architecture, Geiger was active in many civic organizations, and also was the developer of the Fairgreen Subdivision in Miami Beach. (William) Coulton Skinner (1 891-1 963) and his brother John L. Skinner (1893-1972) were from Cleveland, Ohio. Both brothers graduated with degrees in architecture from the University of Toronto. Coulton went into practice in Toronto and Detroit, while John studied toward a Master's Degree at Harvard in 1920. After graduation, John headed the architecture department at Georgia Tech in Atlanta. In 1925 the brothers came to Miami to work on George Merrick's Coral Gables development, eventually designing 18 residences in the "Villages" section. From 1927 to 1932, John Skinner served as the first head of the architecture department at the newly created University of Miami. In Miami Beach, the Skinner brothers designed two Mediterranean Revival style houses in the Palm View Historic District: 1835 Michigan Avenue (1 931) and 1800 Jefferson Avenue (1936). In addition, they designed the Koulton Arms Apartments at 932 l!jth Street, the Barbizon Hotel at 530 Ocean Drive and the Bentley Hotel at 500 Ocean Drive, all constructed in the 1930s. EXHIBIT 'A' In 1941 the Skinners joined architect Harold D. Steward as the firm of Stewart & Skinner. This firm worked on a number of civic and municipal buildings in the Miami area, including the retrofitting of the Nautilus, Pancoast, and Biltmore Hotels as military hospitals during World War 11; several new buildings at the Universityof Miami; the Miami Seaquarium; parts of Miami International Airport; an addition to Jackson Memorial Hospital; the former Miami Public Library; and the Dade County Auditorium. X. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Criteria for Desinnation: Based upon the evidence presented and the historical and architectural significance of the single-family residence located at 2740 North Bay Road, and in accordance with Chapter 1 18, Article X, Division 4, of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, the staff of the City of Miami Beach Planning Department recommends that the Historic Preservation Board adopt the subject property as a local historic structure. 2. Site Boundaries: The Planning Department recommends that the boundaries of the historic site consist of the entire property located on Lot 10 in Block 12 of Sunset Lake Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 52 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. - .. 3. Areas Subiect to Review: The Planning Department recommends that the proposed historic site shall be subject to Section 1 18-591 (f) of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. 4. Review Guidelines: The Planning Department recommends that a decision on an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be based upon Section 1 18-591 (f) of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD City of Miami Beach, Florida MEETING DATE: May 11,2010 FILE NO: 71 32 PROPERTY: 2740 North Bay Road - Single Familv Home LEGAL: Lot 1.0, Block 12, of "Amended Plat of Sunset Lake Subdivision", according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Page 52 of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida. IN RE: The Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the partial demolition, renovation, and restoration of the existing 2-story home, including the construction new one and two story additions. ORDER The applicant, Delphine Dray, filed an application with the City of Miami Beach Planning Department for a Certificate of Appropriateness. The City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT, based upon the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing and which are part of the record for this matter: A. The subject structure is a designated Historic Structure. B. Based on the plans and documents submitted with the application, testimony and information provided by the applicant, and the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report, the project as submitted is consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(a)(1) of the Miami Beach Code, is consistent with the Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria in Section 118-564(a)(2) of the Miami Beach Code, and is not consistent with Certificate of Appropriateness Criteria 'b' in Section 11 8-564(a)(3) of the Miami Beach Code. C. The project would be consistent with the criteria and requirements of section 118-564 if the following conditions are met: 1. Revised elevation, site plan and floor plan drawings shall be submitted to and approved by staff; at a minimum, such drawings shall incorporate the following: Page 2 of 5 HPB File No. 7132 Meeting Date: May 11, 2010 a. The columns supporting the new covered rear terrace on the first floor shall be redesigned to be more consistent with the original square columns of the house, in a manner to be approved by staff. b. The architecture of the proposed second floor terrace, adjacent to the original living room shall be further simplified, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. c. Manufacturers drawings and Dade County product approval numbers for all new windows, doors and glass shall be required. All windows in the original portion of the house that are visible from a right-of-way, shall be replaced with windows to match their historic configuration, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. d. Any roof-top fixtures, air-conditioning units and mechanical devices shall be clearly noted on a revised roof plan and elevation drawings and shall be screened from view, in a manner to be approved by staff. Any mechanical equipment located at the ground shall be located in a manner that is not disruptive to neighboring properties and is screened from view, subject to the review and approval of staff. e. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the project Architect shall verify, in writing, that the subject project has been constructed in accordance with the plans approved by the Planning Department for Building Permit. 2. A revised landscape plan, and corresponding site plan, shall be submitted to and approved by staff. The species type, quantity, dimensions, spacing, location and overall height of all plant material shall be clearly delineated and subject to the review and approval of staff. At a minimum, such plan shall incorporate the following: a. Ficus hedges shall not be permitted anywhere on the property. The final selection of perimeter landscaping shall be subject to the review and approval of staff. b. The final selection of all landscaped areas located within the right-of-way shall be provided, in a manner to be reviewed and approved by staff. c. A fully automatic irrigation system with 100% coverage and an automatic rain sensor in order to render the system inoperative in the event of rain. Right- of-way areas shall also be incorporated as part of the irrigation system. d. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the project architect shall verify, in writing, that the project is consistent with the site and landscape plans approved by the Planning Department for Building Permit. 3. The final exterior surface color scheme, including color samples, shall be subject to the review and approval of staff and shall require a separate permit. Page 3 of 5 HPB File No. 7132 Meeting Date: May 1 1, 201 0 4. Manufacturers drawings and Dade County product approval numbers for all new windows, doors and glass shall be required, &r to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All roof-top fixtures, air-conditioning units and mechanical devices shall be clearly noted on a revised roof plan and elevation drawings and shall be screened from view, in a manner to be approved by staff. 6. Revised drawings, with corresponding color photographs, that are separate from the construction documents, drawn to scale and clearly documenting the existing conditions of the subject building, shall be submitted. Such drawings and photographs shall include all four elevations and interior floor plans of the building, as well as a site plan. 7. The project shall comply with any landscaping or other sidewalklstreet improvement standards as may be prescribed by a relevant Urban Design Master Plan approved prior to the completion of the project and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 8. The Final Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Drier to the issuance of a Building Permit. 9. The Final Order is not severable, and if any provision or condition hereof is held void or unconstitutional in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction, the order shall be returned to the Board for reconsideration as to whether the order meets the criteria for approval absent the stricken provision or condition, andlor it is appropriate to modify the remaining conditions or impose new conditions. 10. The conditions of approval herein are binding on the applicant, the property's owners, operators, and all successors in interest and assigns. 11. Nothing in this order authorizes a violation of the City Code or other applicable law, nor allows a relaxation of any requirement or standard set forth in the City Code. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the evidence, information, testimony and materials presented at the public hearing, which are part of the record for this matter, and the staff report and analysis, which are adopted herein, including the staff recommendations, which were amended by the Board, that the Certificate of Appropriateness is GRANTED for the above-referenced project subject to those certain conditions specified in paragraph C of the Findings of Fact (Condition Nos. 1-11, inclusive) hereof, to which the applicant has agreed. PROVIDED, the applicant shall build substantially in accordance with the plans approved by the Historic Preservation Board, as determined by staff, entitled "New Residence for Ms. Delphine Dray", as prepared by Ramon Pacheco Architect & Planner, dated 2-25-201 0. Page 4 of 5 HPB File No. 7132 Meeting Date: May 1 1, 201 0 When requesting a building permit, the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order. No building permit may be issued unless and until all conditions of approval that must be satisfied prior to permit issuance, as set forth in this Order, have been met. The issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness does not relieve the applicant from obtaining all other required Municipal, County andlor State reviews and permits, including final zoning approval. If adequate handicapped access is not provided on the Board-approved plans, this approval does not mean that such handicapped access is not required. When requesting a building permit, the plans submitted to the Building Department for permit shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Board, modified in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Order. If the Full Building Permit for the project is not issued within eighteen (1 8) months of the meeting date at which the original Certificate of Appropriateness was granted, the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and become null and void. If the Full Building Permit for the project should expire for any reason (including but not limited to construction not commencing and continuing, with required inspections, in accordance with the applicable Building Code), the Certificate of Appropriateness will expire and become null and void. In accordance with Section 118-561 of the City Code, the violation of any conditions and safeguards that are a part of this Order shall be deemed a violation of the land development regulations of the City Code. Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the Certificate of Appropriateness to Section 118-564, City Code, for revocation or modification of the Certificate of Appropriateness. Dated this 17'? dayof flfly ,20~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA BY: THOMAS R. MOONEY, AlCP DESIGN AND PRESERVATION MANA~ER FOR THE CHAIR Page 5 of 5 HPB File No. 7132 Meeting Date: May 1 1, 201 0 STATE OF FLORIDA ) >ss COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I 7 day of y 20E by Thomas R. Mooney, Design and Preservation Manager, Planning ~b~artrnent, City of Miami Beach, Florida, a Florida Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is personally known to me. Notary Publ~c State of Florida NOTARY PU~LIC Miami-Dade County, Florida My commission expires: Approved As To Form: Legal Department: ( sed ha74 o ) Filed with the Clerk of the Hzoric Preservation I Board on Sh7/%6/6 ( *?c ) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C;UMMlSSlON I I tM SUMMAKY Condensed Title: A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Commission Of The City Of Miami Beach, Florida. Accepting The I Recommendation of ~h& city ~anager, Pursuant To Request r or Qualifications (RFQ) N;. 42-09/16, For Noise, Acoustic, And/or Sound Services, On An "As-Needed Basis", For Projects In Which The Basic Construction Cost Does Not Exceed $2 Million or For Study Activities When The Feed For Such Professional Services Does Not Exceed $200,000; Authorizing The Mayor and City Clerk To Execute Professional Services Agreements Upon Completion Of Successful Negotiations With The Six(6) Top-Ranked Proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc, Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering And Environmental Services, Inc, Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A., and Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Maintain strong growth management policies Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): Nearly half of all residential respondents, 47.6%, suggested the effort put forth by the Crty to regulate development is "about the right amount." Issue: I Shall the Mayor and City Commission Adopt The Resolution? Item Summary/Recommendation: I On July 14.2010, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of RequestforQualificatiins(RFQ) 1 No. 4210911 0, for Noise, Acoustic, andlor Sound Consulting Services on an "as-needed basis" forthe rekof projects being reviewed by the Crty's Planning Department staff and the City's Land Use Review Boards. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide noise, acoustic, and/or sound services. The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Each proposed contract shall be for a two (2) year term, with two (2) one-year renewal options at the Crty's option. RFQ No. 42-09/10 was issued on July 19,2010, with an opening date of August 18,2010. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on July28,2010. BidNet issued bid notices to 44 prospective proposers, Bidsync (formerly known as RFP Depot) issued bid notices to 19 prospective proposers, and 14 proposers were notified via mail, e-mail, which resulted in the receipt of eight (8) proposals. On September 30, 2010, the Crty Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 260-2010, appointed an Evaluation Committee ("the Committee"). The Committee convened on October 27,2010, to discuss their individual perceptions of the proposer's qualifications, experience, and competence, and further ranked the proposers accordingly. The Administration recommends entering into negotiations with the six(6) topranked proposers; Sieben Associates, Inc, Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc, Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A., and Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc. APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: I I I City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: I Gus Lopez, Ext. 6641 I I Financial Information: T:MGENDydO4O\Novernber 1AConsenfiRFQ 12-09-10 Noise. Acoustic, Sound Semites-Sumrnarydo; kacrunt Source of Funds: I OBPl Financial Impact Summary: 1 2. Total hunt MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO : Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17, 201 0 v SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ClTY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING FIRMS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 42-09/10, FOR NOISE, ACOUSTIC, AND/OR SOUND SERVICES, ON AN "AS-NEEDED BASIS", FOR PROJECTS IN WHICH THE BASIC CONSTRUCTION COST DOES NOT EXCEED $2 MILLION OR FOR STUDY ACTIVITIES WHEN THE FEE FOR SUCH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DOES NOT EXCEED $200,000; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SIX (6) TOP-RANKED PROPOSERS: SIEBEN ASSOCIATES, INC , ARPEGGIO ACOUSTIC CONSULTANT, LLC, THE AUDIO BUG, INC, LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A., AND KINSELLA-MARSH GROUP, INC. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. FUNDING Funds are available from the professional services budget accounts allocated to some City Departments, subject to the review of the Office of Budget and Performance Improvement (OBPI). Funding for most studies under this RFP will be paid for by applicants to the City's land use boards. KEY INTENDED OUTCOME SUPPORTED Maintain strong growth management policies. ANALYSIS In accordance with Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, known as the "Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act", the City may enter into a "continuing contract" for professional architectural and engineering services for projects in which construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities for which the fee does not exceed $200,000. The City may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be paid under the contract only during competitive negotiations, which will take place after the selection of the firms deemed to be the most qualified to perform the required services. If the City is not Commission Memorandum - RFQ#042-09-10 For Noise, Acoustic, and/or Sound services on an "as- needed basis November 17,201 0 Page 2 able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory compensation schedule with the top-ranked firms which is determined to be fair, competitive and reasonable, additional firms in the order of their competence and qualifications may be selected, and negotiations may continue until an agreement is reached. It is the intent of the Administration to use the RFQ process to select firms who are qualified to provide noise, acoustic, and/or sound services. On July 14, 2010, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 42-09/10, for Noise, Acoustic, andlor Sound Consulting Services on an "as-needed basis" for the review of projects being reviewed by the City's Planning Department staff and the City's Land Use Review Boards. The price and terms for the contracts will be negotiated after City Commission approves authorization to negotiate. Each proposed contract shall be for a two (2) year term, with two (2) one-year renewal options at the City's option. Under these Agreements, study activities are quoted as a lump sum based on the estimated hours to complete the project. Detailed hourly rates will be negotiated for all personnel classifications for the firms. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services define, but do not limit the scope of work to be provided by the selected firms pursuant to this RFQ selection process: Prepare technical noise/acoustic assessment studies/reports, for use by the City's Planning Department staff and the City's land use review boards, reviewing selected development proposals before the subject boards. Review selected applicant submitted technical noise/acoustic assessment studieslreports, and prepare reports for use by the City's Planning Department staff and the City's land use review boards, analyzing the subject applicant submitted reports for accuracy and correctness. The above studies will require the staff resources, degree of specialization, and equipment availability that can be provided by specialized consulting firms. RFQ PROCESS RFQ No. 42-09/10 was issued on July 19, 2010, with an opening date of August 18, 2010. A pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on July 28, 201 0. BidNet issued bid notices to 44 prospective proposers, BidSync (formerly known as RFP Depot) issued bid notices to 19 prospective proposers, and 14 proposers were notified via mail, e-mail, which resulted in the receipt of the following eight (8) proposals: Commission Memorandum - RFQ#042-09-10 For Noise, Acoustic, andlor Sound services on an "as- needed basis November 17,201 0 Page 3 1. Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A. 2. Arpegio Acoustic Consultant, LLC 3. The Audio Bug, Inc 4. Gannett Fleming, Inc 5. Quest Engineering Services & Testing, Inc 6. Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc 7. Sieben Associates, Inc 8. Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc On September 30, 2010, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 260-2010, appointed an Evaluation Committee ("the Committee") consisting of the following individuals: Morris Sunshine, Resident and Beach Preservation Committee member Jo Manning, Resident and Historic Preservation Board member Michael Belush, Senior Planner Jose Alberto, Code Compliance Administrator 0 Frank Fiorentino, Resident, Vice President of 1500 Ocean Drive Condominium Association and Board of Directors of the North Ocean Drive Area Resident Association. Dwight Kraai, Leadership Academy Graduate and CIP Oversight Committee member Wendy Kallergis, President of Greater Miami and the Beaches Hotel Association Resident and Historic Preservation Committee member, Jo Manning, was unable to participate therefore, resident, Matthew Leibowitz, was appointed to the Committee to replace Ms. Manning. The Committee convened on October 27, 2010, and a quorum was attained. The Committee was provided with general information on the scope of services, Performance Evaluation Surveys and additional pertinent information from all responsive proposers. The following Evaluation Criteria was used to evaluate and rank the groups or individuals: A. The Firm's Qualifications and Experience in providing Noise, Acoustic, and/or Sound Consulting Services. (30 points) B. The Consultant's experience; (25 points) C. References provided by prior Project Owners; (15 points) D. Willingness to meet time and budget requirements as demonstrated by past performance;(5 points) E. Certified minority business enterprise; (5 points). Either the Prime Consultant or the sub-consultant team may qualify for proof of certification for minority business enterprise participation. Accepted minority business enterprise certifications include the Small Business Administration (SBA), State of Florida, or Miami-Dade County. F. Location; (5 points) G. Recent, current, and projected workloads of the firms; (5 points) H. Volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the agency, with the object; of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms; (10 points) The Committee discussed their individual perceptions of the proposer's qualifications, experience, and competence, and further ranked the proposers accordingly. Commission Memorandum - RFQ#042-09-10 For Noise, Acoustic, and/or Sound services on an "as- needed basis November 17,2010 Page 4 A motion was presented by Dwight Kraai, seconded by Jose Alberto and unanimously approved by all Committee members to recommend entering into negotiations with the top three (3) ranked proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc; Arpeggio Acoustic Consulting, LLC, and The Audio Bug, Inc. FLEMING, INC CITY MANAGER'S DUE DILIGENCE As part of the City Manager's due diligence, feedback was requested from the Acting Planning Director, Richard Lorber. The Administration recommends entering into negotiations with the six (6) top-ranked proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc, Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc, Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A., and Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc. Although the Evlauation committee did an excellent job at assessing the firms' qualifications and ranking the submittals, their decision to limit the recommendation to only the top three firms will restrict City staffs ability to quickly commission expert studies when the need arises. The intention of the RFQ was to develop a list of approved firms that could be contracted with on "an as needed basis", ensuring easy availability of one or more qualified firms if the selected firm were either unavailable at a critical time, or had other conflicts which prevented staff from choosing them. Commission Memorandum - RFQ#042-09-10 For Noise, Acoustic, andlor Sound services on an "as- needed basis November 17,2010 Page 5 Once the consultant contracts are in place, Planning Department staff will be able to choose firms on an as needed basis, either according to the firm's areas of specialization, on a rotating basis, or based upon availability or a combination of the above. By using several different firms, the appearance of a "preferred" firm will be avoided. Staff will monitor the process for the duration of the initial contracts, and then make recommendations on whether additional changes to the process are warranted. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida accepts the recommendation of the City Manager pertaining to the ranking of proposals pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 42-09/10, for Noise, Acoustic, and/or Sound Services , on an "as-needed basis" for projects in which basic construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities when the fee for such professional service does not exceed $200,000; Authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the six (6) top-ranked proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc, Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, lnc, Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A., and Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc.; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. T:WGENDA\2010\Novernber 17\Consent\RFQ-42-09-10 - Noise, Acoustic and Sound Services- Memo.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ClTY MANAGER PERTAINING TO THE RANKING OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING FIRMS, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 42-09/10, FOR NOISE, ACOUSTIC, AND/OR SOUND SERVICES, ON AN "AS-NEEDED BASIS", FOR PROJECTS IN WHICH THE BASIC CONSTRUCTION COST DOES NOT EXCEED $2 MILLION OR FOR STUDY ACTIVITIES WHEN THE FEE FOR SUCH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DOES NOT EXCEED $200,000; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SIX (6) TOP-RANKED PROPOSERS: SIEBEN ASSOCIATES, INC , ARPEGGIO ACOUSTIC CONSULTANT, LLC, THE AUDIO BUG, INC, LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A., AND KINSELLA-MARSH GROUP, INC. WHEREAS, on July 14, 2010, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 42-09/10, for Noise, Acoustic, and/or Sound Services on an "as-needed basis" for the review of projects being reviewed by the City's Planning Department staff and the City's Land Use Review Boards. (the "RFQ"); and WHEREAS, the RFQ was issued on July 19, 2010, with an opening date of August 18,2010; and WHEREAS, a pre-proposal conference to provide information to the proposers submitting a response was held on July 28, 201 0; and WHEREAS, BidNet issued bid notices to 44 prospective proposers, BidSync (formerly known as RFP Depot) issued bid notices to 19 prospective proposers, and 14 proposers were notified via mail, e-mail, which resulted in the receipt of eight (8) proposals; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2010, the City Manager via Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 260-2010, appointed an Evaluation Committee ("the Committee") consisting of the following individuals: Morris Sunshine, Resident and Beach Preservation Committee member; Jo Manning, Resident and Historic Preservation Board member; Michael Belush, Senior Planner; Jose Alberto, Code Compliance Administrator; Frank Fiorentino, Resident, Vice President of 1500 Ocean Drive Condominium; Association and Board of Directors of the North Ocean Drive Area Resident; Association; Dwight Kraai, Leadership Academy Graduate and CIP Oversight Committee member; Wendy Kallergis, President of Greater Miami and the Beaches Hotel Association; and WHEREAS, resident and Historic Preservation Committee member, Jo Manning, was unable to participate therefore, resident, Matthew Leibowitz, was appointed to the Committee to replace Ms. Manning; and WHEREAS, the Committee convened on October 27, 2010, and a quorum was attained. The Committee was provided with general information on the scope of services, Performance Evaluation Surveys and additional pertinent information from all responsive proposers; and WHEREAS, the Committee discussed their individual perceptions of the proposer's qualifications, experience, and competence, and further ranked the proposers accordingly; and WHEREAS, a motion was presented by Dwight Kraai, seconded by Jose Alberto and unanimously approved by all Committee members to recommend entering into negotiations with the top three (3) ranked proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc; Arpeggio Acoustic Consulting, LLC, and The Audio Bug, Inc; and WHEREAS, after considering the review and recommendation of the Evaluation Committee, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and carefully considered the specifics of this RFQ process. As a result, the City Manager recommends to the Mayor and City Commission that the City enter into negotiations with the six (6) top-ranked proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc, Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc, Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A., and Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 42-09/10, for Noise, Acoustic, and/or Sound Services , on an "as-needed basis" for projects in which basic construction costs do not exceed $2 Million or for study activities when the fee for such professional service does not exceed $200,000; Authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the six (6) top-ranked proposers: Sieben Associates, Inc, Arpeggio Acoustic Consultant, LLC, The Audio Bug, Inc, Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc, Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A., and Kinsella-Marsh Group, Inc.; and further authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements upon conclusion of successful negotiations by the Administration. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 201 0. ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR T:\AGENDA\2010\November 17\Consent\RFQ 42-09-10 - Noise, Acoustic, and Sound Services - RESO.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOH EXECUTION COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, setting a first reading public hearing to consider amending Chapter 142, "Zoning Districts And Regulations," Article II "District Regulations," Division 18 "PS Performance Standard District," to allow low impact car washing and auto detailing in the CPS-2 district, when completely contained within a parking garage structure, and not visible from the street or public right-of-way. Key Intended Outcome Supported: I Neighborhood satisfaction and Maintain strong growth management policies. I Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc Nearly half of all residential respondents, 47.6%, suggested the effort put forth by the City to regulate development is "about the right amount." Issue: Should the City Commission set the public hearing to consider allowing low impact car washing and auto detailing in parking structures in the C-PS2? Item SummarylRecommendation: SETTING PUBLIC HEARING Currently, Section 142-692 of the City Code contains a list of uses permitted in each district within the PS Performance Standards districts, the area located south of Sixth Street, and from the Atlantic Ocean to Biscayne Bay, which is analogous to the previously existing redevelopment area. As such, although commercial uses are permitted within the Commercial districts such as CPS-2, the development regulations for this zoning district contain a prohibition that car washes, filling stations and any use that sells gasoline, automobiles or auto repair, as they are considered industrial uses and not permitted in the redevelopment area. While there has been strong demand for car wash services within the City, these are limited to the Urban Light Industrial 1-1 district, and as accessory uses to existing non-conforming gas stations when part of a renovation including the provision of a generator. However, while completely enclosed commercial car washes may be potentially permitted in other Commercial zoning districts, in the case of the C-PS2, even that possibility does not exist, because of the blanket prohibition on car washes contained in the section. The Administration recommends that the City Commission set a first reading public hearing for the December 8,2010 meeting. Advisory Board Recommendation: I At the October 26,2010 meeting, the Planning Board recommended that the City Commission approve I proposed ordinance by a vote of 5-1 (one member absent). Financial Information: MIAMIBEACH OBPl AGEMDA ITEM C71 Source of Funds: Total Amount 1 Financial Impact Summary: The proposed ordinance is not expected to have any fiscal impact upon the resources of the City at this time. City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: Richard Lorber or Mercy Lamazares Account MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.rniamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of thepity Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17,201 0 Setting of Public Hearing SUBJECT: Allow low impact car washing and detailing in the C-PS2 zoning district. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING A FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 142, "ZONING DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS," ARTICLE II "DISTRICT REGULATIONS," DIVISION 18 "PS PERFORMANCE STANDARD DISTRICT," AMENDING SECTION 142-693 "PERMITTED USES," BY PERMITTING LOW IMPACT CAR WASHING AND AUTO DETAILING IN THE CPS-2 DISTRICT, WHEN COMPLETELY CONTAINED WITHIN A PARKING GARAGE STRUCTURE, AND NOT VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the City Commission set a first reading public hearing for the December 8, 2010 meeting. BACKGROUND At the July 29, 2010 meeting, the Land Use and Development Committee discussed a request made by the City Commission, at its July 14, 2010 meeting, for a possible amendment to the development regulations of the C-PS2 zoning district that would permit low impact car washing and detailing within a parking structure, Historical Background The South Shore Redevelopment Agency was created in 1973. At that time the agency prepared a redevelopment plan, "The South Shore Redevelopment Plan," adopted on March 2, 1977. The Plan called for "predominant clearance of buildings and the selection of a master developer. In 1982, after failing to select a master developer, the City abandoned the 1976 Redevelopment Plan and appointed a committee to prepare a new revitalization strategy for the area. City Commission Memorandum File 1978 - low impact car washing and detailing in the C-PS2 zoning district November 17,2010 Page 2 Ordinance No. 84-2439, adopted on September 19, 1984 established the PS Performance Standard District for the South Shore Redevelopment area and the development regulations for the district. Ordinance 89-2665, known as the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, which became effective on October 1, 1989, which amended previous zoning ordinances, included a restriction in the PS Performance Standard District for filling stations and any use that sells gasoline or automotive or related repair uses. These uses were considered industrial uses and not to be permitted in the Redevelopment Area. Ordinance 94-2908 amended the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 89-2665. Among the amendments was new text clarifying the uses allowed in the PS Performance Standard District by including in the uses not permitted the sale of automobiles. It should be noted that long ago, the sale and service of automobiles was a permitted use in the area. The 5th and Alton project occupies what was the Potamkin dealership service area. The showroom at the time was across the street to the west. It should also be noted that the South Shore Redevelopment Area was sunsetted on September 30, 2005 although the PS Performance Standard regulations remain in place. ANALYSIS Currently, Section 142-692 of the City Code contains a list of uses permitted in each district within the PS Performance Standards districts, the area located south of Sixth Street, and from the Atlantic Ocean to Biscayne Bay, which is analogous to the previously existing redevelopment area. As such, although commercial uses are permitted within the Commercial districts such as CPS-2, the development regulations for this zoning district contain a prohibition that car washes, filling stations and any use that sells gasoline, automobiles or auto repair, as they are considered industrial uses and not permitted in the redevelopment area. City Commission Memorandum File 1978 - low impact car washing and detailing in the C-PS2 zoning district November 17, 2010 Page 3 While there has been strong demand for car wash services within the City, these are limited to the Urban Light Industrial 1-1 district, and as accessory uses to existing non- conforming gas stations when part of a renovation including the provision of a generator. However, while completely enclosed commercial car washes may be potentially permitted in other Commercial zoning districts, in the case of the C-PS2, even that possibility does not exist, because of the blanket prohibition on car washes contained in the section. Staff suggests that the ordinance permit car wash services within parking garage structures in the CPS-2 district, when such services are completely contained within the garage and not visible from the street or public right-of-way. These types of accessory car washes are common in other areas of South Florida and should not cause disruption to neighboring properties if contained properly. PLANNING BOARD ACTION At the October 26, 2010 meeting, the Planning Board recommended that the City Commission approve the proposed ordinance by a vote of 5-1, with one member absent. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the City Commission set a first reading public hearing for the December 8, 2010 meeting. Pursuant to Section 118-164 (2) of the City Code, when the proposed amendment changes the actual list of permitted, conditional or prohibited uses within a zoning category, regardless of the acreage of the area affected, the City Commission shall hold two advertised public hearings on the proposed ordinance. At least one hearing shall be held after 500 p.m. on a weekday. The first public hearing shall be held at least seven days after the day that the first advertisement is published. The second public hearing shall be advertised at least five days prior to the public hearing. The required advertisements shall be no less than two columns wide by ten inches long in a standard size or tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF (TYPE OF) CHANGE The City of Miami Beach proposes to adopt the following ordinance: (title of ordinance) A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on (date and time) at (meetina place). JMGIJGGI FP GUML CL T:WGENDAUOlO\September 15\Regular\1887 - FLUM & Zoning South Shore Hospital Ist&only public hearing.docx RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, SETTING A FIRST READING PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 142, "ZONING DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS," ARTICLE II, "DISTRICT REGULATIONS," DIVISION 18, "PS PERFORMANCE STANDARD DISTRICT," AMENDING SECTION 142-693 "PERMITTED USES," BY PERMITTING LOW IMPACT CAR WASHING AND AUTO DETAILING IN THE CPS-2 DISTRICT, WHEN COMPLETELY CONTAINED WITHIN A PARKING GARAGE STRUCTURE, AND NOT VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, while commercial uses are permitted within the Commercial districts, the CPS-2 district regulations contain a prohibition for car washes, filling stations and any use that sells gasoline, automobiles or auto repair, as these uses are treated as industrial uses for purposes of the redevelopment area and not permitted there; and WHEREAS, car wash services within the City are limited to the Urban Light Industrial 1-1 district, and as accessory uses to existing, and to non-conforming gas stations when the provision of a generator is part of a renovation; and WHEREAS, commercial car washes could potentially be permitted in other Commercial zoning districts if completely enclosed and not outwardly apparent as an automobile related use; and WHEREAS, these types of accessory car washes should not cause disruption to neighboring properties if contained properly; and WHEREAS, this type of service would be in the best interest of the City and the general welfare of its residents. NOW THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that a first reading public hearing shall be held on December 8, 2010 to consider the proposed amendment to the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2010. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LANGUAGE T:\AGENDA\201 O\November I nConsent\I 978 - reso set THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution Of The Mayor And City Commission Of The City Of Miami Beach, Florida, Accepting The Recommendation Of The City Manager, Pursuant To Request For Qualifications (RFQ) No. 48-09/10, For The Project Development And Environment Study For The West Avenue Bridge Project, And Authorizing The Administration To Enter Into Negotiations With The TopRanked Firm, Gannett Fleming, Inc.; And Should The Administration Not Be Able to Successfully Negotiate An Agreement With The Top-Ranked Firm, Authorizing The Administration To Negotiate With The Second-Ranked Firm, T.Y. Lin International; And Should The Administration Not Be Able To Negotiate An Agreement With The Second-Ranked Firm, Authorizing The Administration To Negotiate An Agreement With The Third-Ranked Firm, The Corradino Group, Inc. Key Intended Outcome Supported: I Ensure well-maintained infrastructure Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): According to the City's 2007 Community Satisfaction Survey, 84% of City residents rated recent capital projects completed as "excellent" or "good." Issue: I Shall the Mayor and City Commission adopt the Resolution? I Item SummarylRecommendation: The West Avenue Bridge Project (Project) proposes to construct a new bridge over the Collins Canal at West Avenue. The proposed cross section of the bridge consists of two travel lanes, bi-directional bike lanes, and a sidewalk on each side of the road. The Project Development Environment (PD&E) Study ensures that the Project, which is receiving federal aid, follows the policies and procedures outlined in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The first task in the PD&E Study is data collection for the study area. Once the data collection is completed, the Consultant will conduct an alternatives analysis, where several alternative bridge concepts will be developed. The alternatives analysis will be comprised of the technical engineering and environmental analyses identified during the ETDM Programming Screen. The potential environmental, social, cultural, and physical impacts associated with each alternative will be assessed. The engineering analysis will include the development of conceptual plans that show a typical cross section and plan view of the alternatives overlaid on aerial photographs. It will also include a traffic analysis, as well as geotechnical, drainage, and bridge hydraulic reports. The environmental analysis will include cultural resource, essential fish habitat, and endangered species biological assessments, as well as other environmental evaluations and reports. Based on the alternatives analysis and public input, an evaluation matrix will be used to eliminate the least desirable alternatives and select a single-preferred alternative that meets the purpose and need of the project, along with the No-build alternative. On October 15, 2010, an Evaluation Committee convened to score and rank the proposals. Based on the scores and rankings of the Committee members, a motion was presented by Elizabeth Wheaton, seconded by Walter Miros, and was unanimously approved by the Committee to recommend Gannett Fleming, Inc., as the topranked firm, T.Y. Lin International as the second-ranked firm, and The Corradino Group, Inc. as the third-ranked firm. I Gannett Flemincl. Inc. I Gannett Fleming was founded in 1915 and currently provides an array of services in the transportation, waterlwastewater, facilities, environmental, and information technology disciplines. Gannett managed the PD&E study for Alton Road, from 5th Street to Michigan Avenue, the Venetian Causeway Master Plan and Design, the Lincoln Road Mall Extension, and the Collins Avenue Resurfacing from 26th to 44th Streets in Miami Beach. Gannett's project team consists of ~imJe~-~orn & Associates, CH Perez & Associates, Inc., Holt Communications, Glass Land Acquisition Services Specialists, Inc., Geosol, Inc., Southern Resource Mapping of Miami, Janus Research, Oppenheim Architecture + Design, Akerman Senterfitt, and Infinite Source PR. I I Advisory Board Recommendation: Financial Information: Source of Amount i At~ourrt Funds: 1 : N/A OBPl Total Financial Impact Summary: N/A He- MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17,2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ClTY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 48- 09110, FOR THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY FOR THE WEST AVENUE BRIDGE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, GANNETT FLEMING, INC.; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE TOP- RANKED FIRM, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE WlTH THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM, T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE THIRD-RANKED FIRM, THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BACKGROUND The West Avenue Bridge Project (Project) proposes to construct a new bridge over the Collins Canal at West Avenue. The proposed cross section of the bridge consists of two travel lanes, bi- directional bike lanes, and a sidewalk on each side of the road. A preliminary estimated budgetary opinion of the West Avenue Bridge Project, including a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, architecturallengineering services, construction, and the costs associated with land acquisition for the bridge right-of-way (ROW), is approximately $5,239,589. The City has received a total of $1,259,372 in Federal High Priority Project (FHPP) funding for planning and design. The City has allocated People's Transportation Plan funds in the amount of $747,720 and Concurrency Mitigation Funds in the amount of $28,068. The City is also requesting Miami-Dade County District 8 Road Impact Fee funds in the amount of $3,011,000 for the project, leaving a balance needed of $1 93,429. The City has conducted a planning-level traffic analysis and feasibility study, which investigated all traffic movements associated with this proposed bridge. The traffic study evaluated the most viable options for a fixed crossing and the potential costs associated with the construction of a Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 2 of 29 preferred alternative. The traffic analysis evaluated the impacts to the surrounding neighborhood by routing some of the traffic from Alton Road, a major arterial roadway, to West Avenue, an urban collector roadway. The results of the study determined that the proposed bridge would help alleviate traffic congestion along Alton Road and along 17fh Street, and would improve transit, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility and safety. The proposed bridge would provide a more direct connection to the Sunset Neighborhoods and reduce the potential for safety conflicts at the intersections of Dade Boulevard and Bay Road. The City and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) completed the Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) Programming Screen for the Project. The ETDM Programming Screen provided an opportunity for various government agencies and the public to provide early input on the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of the proposed bridge. It also provides guidance on the types of environmental and engineering studies that will be required for the Project, and establishes the Class of Action Determination. In October 2009, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) approved a Categorical Exclusion Type II Class of Action Determination. The City will manage the next phases of the project, which will be a PD&E Study and ROW Acquisition. These phases will be closely coordinated with FDOT. SCOPE OF SERVICES The PD&E Study ensures that the Project, which is receiving federal aid, follows the policies and procedures outlined in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The first task in the PD&E Study is data collection for the study area. Once the data collection is completed, the Consultant will conduct an alternatives analysis, where several alternative bridge concepts will be developed. The alternatives analysis will be comprised of the technical engineering and environmental analyses identified during the ETDM Programming Screen. The potential environmental, social, cultural, and physical impacts associated with each alternative will be assessed. The engineering analysis will include the development of conceptual plans that show a typical cross section and plan view of the alternatives overlaid on aerial photographs. It will also include a traffic analysis as well as geotechnical, drainage, and bridge hydraulic reports. The environmental analysis will include cultural resource, essential fish habitat, and endangered species biological assessments, as well as other environmental evaluations and reports. Based on the alternatives analysis and public input, an evaluation matrix will be used to eliminate the least desirable alternatives and select a single-preferred alternative that meets the purpose and need of the project, along with the No-build alternative. The community will be involved throughout the PD&E process through the implementation of a Public Involvement Plan (PIP). Residents, business owners, and other stakeholders will have several opportunities to review project information and participate in the decision making process. The public will be invited to attend public meetings throughout the study to review and comment on the alternative conceptual designs of the Project. At the end of the PD&E process, a public hearing is held to provide an official public forum where all impacted stakeholders can express their concerns, opinions, and comments regarding the Project. After the comments from the public hearing have been addressed, the analyses conducted throughout the PD&E process and all public input are compiled into a Project Development Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 3 of 29 Summary Report (PDSR). The PDSR is submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for Location and Design Concept Acceptance. Once this acceptance is received, the study phase of the project will be complete. It is estimated that the entire PD&E process will be completed within eighteen (1 8) months. The phases that follow the study phase include the design and construction of the approved improvements. The successful firm will be tasked with the following duties and responsibilities in addition to the complete scope of services noted in Appendix A: 0 Additional Services: No additional services are envisioned at this time. However, if such services are required during the performance of the work, they will be requested by the City and negotiated in accordance with the Contract requirements. Reimbursable Services: The City may reimburse additional expenses such as reproduction costs, survey, geotechnical work, underground utility verification costs and material testing / abatement. RFQ PROCESS On August 17, 2010, the RFQ was issued with an opening date of September 17, 2010. A Pre- proposal meeting to provide information to prospective proposers was held on August 30,201 0. Bidsync issued bid notices to 4,258 prospective bidders which resulted in the receipt of the following four (4) bids: BCC Engineering, Inc. 0 The Corradino Group, Inc. o Gannett Fleming, Inc. T. Y. Lin International The City Manager, via a Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 259-2010, appointed an Evaluation Committee (the "Committee") consisting of the following individuals: 0 Christine Bettin, Transportation Coordinator, Miami Beach Public Works - Transportation Dat Huynh, P.E., District Project Development Engineer, Florida Dept. of Transportation Walter Miros, Miami Beach Resident, Leadership Academy Graduate Marcos Redondo, Project Manager, Miami-Dade County Public Works 0 Betsy Wheaton, Environmental Specialist, Miami Beach Public Works - Storm Water EVALUATION PROCESS On October 15, 2010, the Committee convened to score and rank the proposals. Prior to the meeting commencing, two members noted in their disclosure questionnaire that they had previously worked for firms that were to be evaluated. Dat Haynh disclosed that he worked for The Corradino Group, Inc. five (5) years ago while Marcos Redondo disclosed having worked for Gannett Fleming twelve (12) years ago. While there is no legal conflict of interest that would prevent both from participating as part of the Committee, there could be a perceived conflict of Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17,2010 Page 5 of 29 Based on the scores and rankings of the Committee members, a motion was presented by Elizabeth Wheaton, seconded by Walter Miros, and was unanimously approved by the Committee to recommend Gannett Fleming, Inc., as the top-ranked firm, T.Y. Lin International as the second-ranked firm, and The Corradino Group, Inc. as the third-ranked firm. Gannett Fleming, Inc. Gannett Fleming was founded in 1915 and currently provides an array of services in the transportation, waterlwastewater, facilities, environmental, and information technology disciplines. Gannett managed the PD&E study for 5'h Street and Michigan Avenue, the Venetian Causeway Master Plan and Design, the Lincoln Road Mall Extension, and the Collins Avenue Resurfacing from 26'h to 44' Streets in Miami Beach. Gannett's project team consists of Kimley-Horn & Associates, CH Perez & Associates, Inc., Holt Communications, Glass Land Acquisition Services Specialists, Inc., Geosol, Inc., Southern Resource Mapping of Miami, Janus Research, Oppenheim Architecture + Design, Akerman Senterfitt, Infinite Source PR AGREEMENT The results of the Negotiated Agreement to include total cost will be presented to the Mayor and City Commissioner at a regularly scheduled City Commission meeting. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the attached Resolution accepting the recommendation of the City Manager pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 48-09/10, for the Project Development & Environment Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project; and authorizing the Administration to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm, Gannett Fleming, Inc.; and should the Administration not be able to successfully negotiate an agreement with the top-ranked firm, authorizing the Administration to negotiate with the second-ranked firm, T.Y. Lin International; and should the Administration not be able to negotiate an agreement with the second-ranked firm, authorizing the Administration to negotiate an agreement with the third-ranked firm, The Corradino Group, Inc. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 6 of 29 APPENDIX A - DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES WEST AVENUE BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDIES Financial Project ID: 42091 01 Work Program Item No.: Federal Aid Project No.: County Section No.: Description: Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 7 of 29 SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDIES PURPOSE The purpose of this scope of services is to describe the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the City of Miami Beach (CITY) in connection with the Preliminary Engineering (Conceptual Design), and Environmental Studies necessary to comply with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) procedures and to obtain Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Location and Design Concept Acceptance (LDCA) of proposed improvements to this transportation facility. The Project Development Process shall follow FDOT's publication titled "Project Development and Environment Manual", published February 2, 2007, and all subsequent revisions. Throughout this Scope of Services, the publication will be referred to as the "PD&E Manual". All tasks identified in this scope of services will be done in accordance with the PD&E Manual, unless otherwise stated. The PD&E Manual incorporates all the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); Federal law and executive orders; applicable Federal regulations included in the Federal Highway Administration Federal-Aid Policy Guide; and applicable State laws and regulations including Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes. The project documentation prepared by the CONSULTANT in accordance with the PD&E Manual shall therefore comply with all applicable State and Federal laws, executive orders, and regulations. The CONSULTANT shall perform those engineering services required for LDCA studies, including consideration of all social, economic, environmental effects, and mitigation as required by the FHWA and/or the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Manual, along with the required environmental documents, engineering reports, preliminary plans, public hearing, and right-of-way maps. Sections 1 through 4 of the Scope of Services will establish which items of work described in the PD&E Manual are specifically included in this contract, and additionally which of the items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT or the CITY. The CITY will provide contract administration and provide management services and technical reviews of all work associated with the development and preparation of the engineeringlenvironmental study reports for the transportation facility. STUDY OBJECTIVE The CONSULTANT shall study the construction of a new bridge on West Avenue, which would span the Collins Canal at West Avenue from 17'~ Street to Dade Boulevard, in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The project limits are on West Avenue from north of Lincoln Road to south of 18'~ Street. Improvements on the existing portions of West Avenue may include milling and resurfacing, pavement markings, signage, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The CONSULTANT shall develop all viable alternatives for the proposed West Avenue Bridge. The typical sections considered for each alignment shall be, at a minimum, a two lane bridge Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/70 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 8 of 29 with bi-directional bicycle lanes and sidewalks. STUDY REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK Governing Regulations The services performed by the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable CITY and FDOT Manuals and Guidelines. The CITY'S and FDOT's Manuals and Guidelines incorporate, by requirement or reference, all applicable State and Federal regulations. The current edition, including updates, of the following Manuals and Guidelines shall be used in the performance of this work. It is understood that AASHTO criteria shall apply as incipient policy. Florida Statutes Florida Administrative Codes Applicable Federal Regulations, U.S. Codes and Technical Advisories Project Development and Environment Manual ETDM Planning and Programming Manual Sociocultural Effects Evaluation Handbook Public Involvement Handbook Plans Preparation Manual Interchange Handbook (525-030-160) Design Standards (625-01 0-003) Highway Capacity Manual Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance Streets and Highways (Florida Greenbook) (625-000-01 5) Guide for the Design of Bicycle Facilities (AASHTO) Florida Pedestrian Facilities Planning & Design Handbook Rig ht-of-Way Mapping Handbook (550-030-01 5) Right-of-way Procedures Manual (575-000-000) Location Survey Manual (550-030-1 01) EFB User Guide Drainage Manual Department's Stormwater Facilities Handbook Outline Specifications - Aerial Surveys/Photogrammetry Structures Design Guidelines (625-020-1 54) CADD Manual (No. 625-050-001) CADD Production Criteria Handbook FDOT QualityILevel of Service Standards Handbook Software & Tables K-Factor Estimation Process Project Traffic Forecasting Procedure (525-030-1 20) FDOT Highway Landscape Guide Basis of Estimates Manual Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 9 of 29 City of Miami Beach Public Works Manual Liaison Office The ClTY will designate a Project Manager who shall be the representative of the ClTY for the Project. While it is expected the CONSULTANT shall seek and receive advice from various State, regional, and local agencies, the final direction on all matters of this Project remain with the Project Manager. Key Personnel The CONSULTANT'S work shall be performed and directed by the key personnel identified in the proposal presentations by the CONSULTANT. Any changes in the indicated personnel shall be subject to review and approval by the CITY. Meetings and Presentations The CONSULTANT shall attend a Notice to Proceed Meeting with ClTY representatives, where relevant project information will be provided by the CITY, along with procedures for administering the contract. The CONSULTANT and his staff shall also be available with no more than a five (5) workday notice to attend meetings or make presentations at the request of the CITY. Such meetings and presentations may be held at any hour between 8:00 A.M. and 12:OO midnight on any day of the week. The CONSULTANT may be called upon to provide maps, press releases, advertisements, audiovisual displays and similar material for such meetings. Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for insuring that all work products conform to ClTY standards and criteria. This shall be accomplished through an internal Quality Control (QC) process performed by the CONSULTANT. This QC process shall insure that quality is achieved through checking, reviewing, and surveillance of work activities by objective and qualified individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work. Prior to submittal of the first invoice, the CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY'S Project Manager for approval the proposed method or process of providing Quality Control for all work products. The Quality Control Plan shall identify the products to be reviewed, the personnel who perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. Correspondence Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this study shall be provided to the ClTY for their records within one (1) week of the receipt of said correspondence. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/70 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 10 of 29 Submittals The CONSULTANT shall provide electronic and hard copies of the required documents as listed below. These are the anticipated printing requirements for the project. This tabulation will be used for estimating purposes, and the Project Manager will determine the number of copies required prior to each submittal. Public Involvement: Copies: Public Involvement Plan Public Hearing Transcript Certification Comments & Coordination Report Engineering Items: Copies: Traffic Report 03 First Draft Project Development Summary Report 04 Second Draft Project Development Summary Report 04 Final Project Development Summary Report (Signed and Sealed) 04 Location Hydraulics Report 03 DrainageIPond Siting Report Conceptual Design Bridge Plan Set Geotechnical Report Typical Section Package Bridge Hydraulic Report Bridge Development Report Design Variations and Exceptions Package 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 Optional Environmental Items: Copies: Section 4(9 Evaluation Noise Study Report Air Quality Report Technical Memorandum Contamination Screening Evaluation Report Endangered Species Biological Assessment Essential Fish Habitat Assessment Wetlands Evaluation Report Cultural Resource Assessment (Include Section 106 Evaluation) Upon completion of the study, the CONSULTANT shall deliver to the CITY, in an organized manner, all project files, maps, sketches, worksheets, and other materials used or generated during the study process. Computer Automation The project will be developed utilizing Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) systems. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to meet the requirements in the FDOT CADD Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page I I of 29 Manual. The CONSULTANT will submit final documents and files as described therein. Additional related information is found in the FDOT Plans Preparation Manual. All computer disks shall be scanned for viruses prior to submitting to the CITY. Failure to scan for viruses may result in a lower Consultant work performance evaluation. Coordination with Other Consultants and Entities The CONSULTANT is to coordinate their work with any ongoing and/or planned projects that may affect this study. The CONSULTANT is to coordinate with local governmental entities to ensure design and right of way requirements for the project are compatible with local public works improvements and right of way activities. The CONSULTANT is to coordinate with any agencies and/or entities that require further coordination through the ETDM Process. Optional Services At the CITY'S option, the CONSULTANT may be requested to provide final design and plans preparation services. The fee for these services shall be negotiated for a fair, competitive and reasonable cost, considering the scope and complexity of the project@). A supplemental agreement for the additional services shall be executed in accordance with the standard consultant agreement. 1.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement includes communicating to and receiving input from all interested persons, groups, and government organizations regarding the development of the project. The Consultant shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of public involvement for this project as outlined in Part I, Chapterll, and Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual, the FDOT Public lnvolvement Handbook and the following sections of this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the ClTY drafts of all Public lnvolvement collateral (i.e., newsletters, property owner letters, advertisements, etc.) associated with the following tasks for review and approval at least five (5) business days prior to printing and / or distribution. 1 .I Public lnvolvement Program The CONSULTANT will prepare the Public lnvolvement Program. The Public lnvolvement Program is developed and documented and is consistent with Part 1 Chapter 11 of the PD&E Manual. The program must be in written form and incorporated into the project file. 1.2 Public Involvement Data Collection The CONSULTANT shall assist the ClTY with data collection (mailing list, news clipslstories) and in preparing responses to any public inquiries from the public involvement process. 1.3 Notice of Intent A Notice of Intent is not applicable for this project. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 12 of 29 1.4 Advance Notification An Advance Notification is not applicable for this project. The Advanced Notification was submitted during the ETDM Programming Screening and recorded in the EST and Programming Screening Report. 1.5 Scheduled Public Meetings The CONSULTANT shall provide all support necessary for the CITY to hold or participate in various public meetings, which may include but not limited to: Scoping Meetings Elected Officials/Agency Kick-off Meeting Public Kick-off Meeting Public Hearing Corridor or other Public Meeting Alternatives Evaluation Public Meeting For any of the above type meetings, the CONSULTANT shall prepare and/or provide: Scripts or agenda for presentation. Handouts Graphics for presentation. Meeting equipment set-up and tear-down. Legal and/or display advertisements. (The CONSULTANT will pay the cost of publishing.) Letters for notification of elected and appointed officials, property owners and other interested parties. (The CONSULTANT will pay the cost of first class postage.) News releases, for use three to five days prior to meeting. Summary notes of meetings to be provided to the Department no later than 5 business days after the meeting. Briefing and debriefing of Department staff. The CONSULTANT will investigate potential meeting sites to advise the CITY on their suitability. The CONSULTANT will pay all costs for meeting site rental and insurance. The CONSULTANT will attend the meetings with an appropriate number of personnel to assist the CITY'S Project Manager. It is estimated for this project there will be four (4) Public meetings during the study. 1.6 Other (Unscheduled) Public and Agency Meetings In addition to scheduled public meetings, the CONSULTANT may be required to participate in other meetings with the public, elected officials, special interest groups or public agencies. The CONSULTANT'S participation will be limited to participation during the meeting, note taking, and summarizing the meeting in a memo to the file. It is estimated for this project there will be six (6) meetings during the study. 1.7 Public Hearing The CONSULTANT shall provide all the support services listed in Sections 1.2 and 1.5 above, and in addition shall prepare: Public officials and Agency letters: The CONSULTANT will prepare the letters, insert them in Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 1 7, 201 0 Page 13 of 29 envelopes, and address the envelopes. The CONSULTANT will pay for first class postage. At the CITY's discretion, the CONSULTANT will e-mail letters in lieu of or in addition to those sent by U.S. Mail. Property owner letters: The CONSULTANT will provide a list of the names and addresses of the property owners from county tax rolls in a format specified by the CITY. The CONSULTANT will prepare the letters, insert them in envelopes, and address the envelopes. The CONSULTANT will pay for first class postage. All elements of the multi-media presentation, which will include: Graphics Displays of plans and report(s) for the public display. Brochures or handouts. Prepare public advertisements. Court Reporter(s) Briefing and debriefing of City staff. The CONSULTANT will procure a verbatim transcript of the Public Hearing. The CONSULTANT will combine the transcript with any other comments received by the ClTY as part of the public hearing record, and affidavits of publication of legal ads, and will provide copies of the transcript for the CITY's use. The CONSULTANT will also prepare a Public Hearing Summary attached to the Public Hearing Transcript. 1.8 Location and Design Concept Acceptance The CONSULTANT shall prepare a quarter-page legal display advertisement to be published in the area newspaper(s) having the largest daily circulation (The same newspaper(s) the Public Hearing was advertised in). The notice is published and paid for by the CONSULTANT. ClTY review prior to the publication is required. 1.9 Special Public Involvement Requirements 1. Identify and Inspect Public Meeting Sites Prospective sites for any public meetings to be held shall be held at a site near the project location and shall be inspected for suitability. Consideration shall be given to location, seating capacity, sound system, lighting, display space and any other physical characteristics which would influence the viability of this site, including compatibility with the terms of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Possible Public Information Workshop sites (which may also be the Public Hearing site) should be catalogued. Sites which have characteristics more suitable to a Public Hearing (than a more informal information workshop) shall be catalogued. The CONSULTANT shall make all arrangements for use of the meeting facility for the Public Information Workshop(s) and Public Hearing including payment of any rental fees, if applicable. 2. Correspondence Within three days of the receipt or mailing of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining to this study, copies shall be provided to the ClTY for their records. 3. Newsletters The CONSULTANT shall prepare newsletters at various key points during the study. The Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 1 7, 201 0 Page 14 of 29 newsletters shall be mailed by the CONSULTANT to elected officials; property owners, businesses and interested persons included on the mailing list compiled by the CONSULTANT. ClTY review prior to mailing is required. A maximum of eight (8) newsletters are anticipated. 4. Comments and Coordination Report The Comments and Coordination Report shall contain, as a minimum, all documentation of the public participation accomplished throughout the study period. This report should summarize and respond to the comments received from the Public Involvement, Advance Notification, coordination with local officials and agencies, public meetings, etc. as part of Part 2, Chapter 31 of the PD&E Manual. The final Comments and Coordination Report shall be submitted to the Department and summarized in the final PDSR. 5. Project Web Site The CONSULTANT will create a project web site for this project. This site will have a distinct address on the World Wide Web (i.e., www.WestAvenueBridgeProject.com). A link will be established on the ClTY of Miami Beach home page as well as the CONSULTANT'S home page. To allow for input via E-mail links, meeting information and report summaries will be available for viewing and downloading. Limited graphics will be available due to the size and downloading time for many graphical applications. The web site must be updated bi-weekly. The web site will contain a minimum of six pages: A facts page (home page). The facts page will be a brief overview of what the project is, and the need for the project. Project Overview page. The Project Overview page will be printable in pdf format. A PD&E definition page. A link to this site will appear wherever the acronym PD&E appears on any of the subsequent pages. It will give a brief overview of how a PD&E project is done and the outcomes possible from it. A project information page. The project information page will have specific project information as well as results of workshops, hearings, etc. This will be updated to add or delete alternatives being considered as necessary. A public involvement page. The public involvement page will contain a general overview of proposed meetings. This will include Public Information Meetings, Public Workshops, Speaker's Bureau, Neighborhood Homeowners Association Meetings, Public Hearing, and any other meeting the ClTY would like added to the site. The page will also contain an area where viewers may enter their name and address (both are to be mandatory inputs) to be added to the mailing database. The Project Manager's name will be listed as a contact with his FDOT mailing, and E-mail addresses listed as well as his telephone and fax at the District Office. This page will also contain all above information listed for the Department's Project Manager on the subscription page. All pages will be linked to the public involvement page. A project schedule page. The project schedule will contain a brief generalization of the milestones for this project. Milestones will be taken from the schedule developed by the CONSULTANT, as approved by the CITY. Shifts in the schedule will be reflected in this page as they occur. This project will be linked to the CITY'S web site and the ETDM Public Access Site. The CONSULTANT is directed to contact the Project Manager before setting up the web site. All web site development activities will be coordinated with the Project Manager. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 15 of 29 Videos, Renderings, etc.: The CONSULTANT shall prepare an audiovisual presentation for public meetings. See Section 1.5 and 1.7 for presentation requirements related to the Public workshop and hearing. 1 .I 0 Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for insuring that all work products conform to ClTY standards and criteria. This shall be accomplished through an internal quality control process performed by the CONSULTANT. This quality control process shall insure that objective and qualified individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work achieve quality through checking, reviewing, and surveillance of work activities. Prior to submittal of the first invoice, the CONSULTANT shall submit to the Project Manager for approval the proposed method or process of providing quality control for all work products. The Quality Control Plan shall identify the products to be reviewed, the personnel who perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the inclusion of the Quality Assurance Checklist indicating the CONSULTANT'S quality control process has been completed. The CONSULTANT shall review all reports prepared by sub-CONSULTANTS. 2.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND REPORTS The CONSULTANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of engineering analysis for this project as outlined in Part I, Chapter 4 of the PD&E Manual and the following sections. Data Collection Upon notice to proceed, the CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments of the study corridor from an engineering standpoint. This task is largely of a data gathering nature. This activity consists of collecting various information and materials relative to the performance of engineering analyzes within the study area. The information should include all data necessary to perform adequate evaluation of the location and design of a transportation facility. 2.1 Field Review The CONSULTANT shall conduct all anticipated field trips needed to collect engineering data 2.2 Aerial Photography Use Aerial Photography as a basis for plotting various data necessary for both engineering and environmental analysis, alternative corridor and design studies, and the development of the preliminary plans of conceptual design. Copies of aerial photography are the prime source of information used to convey project considerations to the public at public meetings. The CONSULTANT will furnish the necessary aerial photography for use in the study, and at a scale of 120. 2.3 Survey This task is for the CONSULTANT to provide a topographic survey of the project area with sufficient information to determine the particular alignment of the proposed bridge. The CITY can provide a Legal Description of the project area and a "Sketch to Accompany a Legal Description". 2.4 Existing Roadway Characteristics This task includes gathering data on pertinent corridor physical features and conditions which Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 16 of 29 help in better understanding the existing roadway segments under consideration in this contract. Most of this information is available from the CITY; however other references including field observations and interviews with knowledgeable people will yield additional data. CITY sources include project files, contract documents and right-of-way maps, Roadway Characteristic Inventory, and drainage maps. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible to procure the entire engineering data list in Part 1, Chapter 4 of the PD&E Manual and other data necessary to conduct a PD&E study and prepare Project Development Summary Report as described in the ETDM Manual. The CONSULTANT shall develop a CADD database, supported by computer spreadsheets, that includes all existing highway characteristics noted above, as appropriate. CADD database information shall be compatible for use on aerial photography used for Public Hearing displays, the Corridor Base Map(s), and Conceptual Design Plans. 2.5 Existing Structure Characteristics This task includes gathering data on existing structures using the same means as stated above in Section 2.4. 2.6 Traffic Data The CONSULTANT will be responsible for developing the Project Traffic Forecasts for this project. The project forecast years and analysis years are -- existing year, -- opening year, - mid-design year and -- design year. a. Project Traffic Report - The CONSULTANT'S Project Traffic Report shall include at a minimum: An Executive Summary, Introduction Existing Conditionsllnventory Crash Data (as defined in Section 2.7) Traffic Forecasting Methodology Development of Future Year Demand Traffic (AADT) Development of applicable Traffic Factors Traffic Analysis Factors (peak hour factor, driver population factor) Design Hour Demand Traffic (both DHV and DDHV) Analysis of Existing Conditions Development of Future Mainline Requirements Cross Street Geometry Requirements * Traffic lnformation Worksheets for Air and Noise Quality Estimates of Required Storage Length for Major Intersections -"Details and Engineering Technical Write Up of Analysis Techniques Used As Determinates for Recommendations and Provisions for Appended Information" to support all technical recommendations. (1) Existing Conditions/lnventory shall include but not be limited to review of all project corridor(s) by a professional engineer, collection of all available traffic data information (from 2004, 2005,2006, 2007 and 2008) and Crash Data (as defined in Section 2.7). Review of all available FDOTIMiami-Dade County data resources such as: a) Roadway Characteristics Inventory b) FDOT Traffic Count lnformation c) Local traffic count information Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 17 of 29 d) Traffic signal inventoryltiming information e) Review of all currently approved improvements along cross streets and project mainline within a 5 year period from the date of issuance of this project f) Review of previously approved actions for this corridor and/or cross streets (local, State or Federal) (2) Analysis of Existing Conditions on existing facilities shall include but not be limited to a complete evaluation using all applicable modules or manual techniques as described within the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual or HCM (or latest equivalent thereof). The CONSULTANT'S analysis will at a minimum include mainline, ramp mergeldiverge, weaving section and cross street traffic signals within 118 of a mile of each other starting at each respective ramp terminal until such spacing is greater then % mile. The CONSULTANT will need to document each element of Level of Service for each component as noted above. These elements will be compared to the currently adopted FDOT Level of Service Criteria as defined in the FAC 14-94 for the FlHS and SIS facilities. This criteria shall apply for all mainline, ramp mergeldiverge and weaving sections. For other facilities controlled by traffic signals, the standard shall be the adopted LOS (using FAC 14-94 for State Roads and Locally Adopted LOS for Local Roads). Examples of this would be LOS E at intersections for a State Road, with no failing movements, with a locally adopted LOS Standard of C. A summary of all elemental LOS components will be denoted in text, table, and graphic format with analyses sheets provided in a logically labeled and identified appendix (page numbered). Each Location not meeting the adopted LOS shall be denoted in text, table, and graphic format. The analysis of existing conditions will contain a quantitative and qualitative of current operational deficiencies and potential remedial improvements that could improve the existing deficient operation. The CONSULTANT shall review all available traffic count information provided from the FDOT and CountyICITY. The CONSULTANT shall provide a list of supplemental locations needed to the CITY for traffic count data. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for developing Traffic Factors (K, K30, Dl D30 T factor for peak hour and T factor for daily) based on the information from the FDOT Traffic Count Database. The CONSULTANT shall make recommendations for Traffic Analysis Factors (peak hour factor, driver population factor). (3) Future Travel Demand will be established using the locally adopted Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM) for the area as provided by the local Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). In addition, the CONSULTANT shall review the trafk forecasting model and shall be prepared to review the current zonal data information for the MPO's horizon year based on currently observed development trends to extrapolate zonal data to the year 2035. The CONSULTANT shall provide comparative tables and model plots to formulate a basis in determining future year Project Traffic Forecasts. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall review and compare historical traffic count growth trends using information from the FDOT Traffic Count database and local information given a minimum of five continuous years of data at the same location. Other sources of information that the CONSULTANT may review are economic forecasts for the area as provided by local Chamber(s) of Commerce, local Real Estate Professional Association, and other local information sources such as the Economic Development Council. All information as gathered in Sections 2.6.a subsection 1 through 3 above will be summarized in a technical memorandum to be submitted to the CITY. All information is to be submitted in Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 18 of 29 text, tabular and graphic format. The CITY will review the information provided in the Technical Memorandum and provide approval to use the information contained therein to develop final Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT), Design Hourly Volumes (DHV), and Directional Design Hourly Volumes (DDHV). The CONSULTANT shall then prepare the Final Project Forecast Technical Memorandum containing all information in the Draft Project Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum and will include the final AADT, DHV, and DDHV information. All information as presented will be in text, tabular and graphic formats with all support information contained within appendices in a logically order sequence including page numbers. The CONSULTANT shall use this information as the input data source for Section Item 2.18 - Project Traffic and Concept Report of this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT should note that this information in its entirety would be used for the completed Project Traffic and Concepts Report. 2.7 Crash Data The CONSULTANT shall obtain available data from FDOT and local sources for various roadway segments required. Obtain data for previous five years. The data collected shall include the number and type of crashes, crash locations, number of fatalities and injuries, and estimates of property damage and economic loss. 2.8 Existing Signage inventory (Limited Access Only) The CONSULTANT will be responsible for inventorying the existing signage along the project corridors. 2.9 Utilities & Railroads The CONSULTANT shall obtain information in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 10 of the PD&E Manual. 2.10 Transportation Plans The CONSULTANT shall obtain plans for all modes of transportation including surface, transit and non-motorized modes. The following plans or studies should be obtained: Urban Area Transportation Study, and if applicable, County Cost Feasible and Needs Plans Local Comprehensive Plans; ClTY and county Transit; rail, bus, other Non-motorized modes, including bikeways and pedestrian walkways 2.1 1 Soils The CONSULTANT shall review the United States Department of Agriculture, Geological Survey, Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) Maps and summarize the findings. The CONSULTANT must address all tasks outlined in Section 30 Geotechnical of the updated Scope of Services for Highway and BridgeIStructural Design dated March 22, 2002, and all subsequent revisions, applicable to the needs of this project. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 1 7, 201 0 Page 19 of 29 2.12 Base Map The CONSULTANT shall develop a CADD database that includes existing characteristics. CADD database information shall be compatible for use on aerial photography used for public hearing presentations, corridor maps, and concept plans. Needs 2.1 3 Safety Based on the information obtained from the crash data the CONSULTANT shall identify project needs associated with the safety of the existing facility. 2.14 Analysis of Existing Conditions The CONSULTANT shall analyze the existing conditions in order to identify any deficiencies that are to be identified in the Needs section. 2.15 Purpose and Need Statement The CONSULTANT shall update and verify the purpose and need for the project from the Programming Summary Report as outlined in Parf 2, Chapter 5 of the PD&E Manual. Design Analysis Utilizing the data collected as part of this Scope of Services, the CONSULTANT shall perform the engineering analysis necessary to complete the project development process. The task of engineering analysis will be ongoing throughout the duration of the project and will be performed with consideration to the results of the environmental impacts analysis. After selection of viable corridor(s), the CONSULTANT shall develop and analyze alternate conceptual design alternatives. The development of the design alternatives shall consider context sensitive solutions. The CONSULTANT shall develop and evaluate all viable alternatives in order to address the project needs. 2.1 6 Design Analysis The CONSULTANT shall use aerial photography to identify possible alternate designs while giving consideration to the following alignment controls: Available right-of-way through which an improvement providing acceptable service could be routed. Cultural features including public and private development. Natural features which could be impacted by the project. Logical termini giving consideration to directness, length, and service. The CONSULTANT shall analyze and evaluate each alternate to a point of rejection or selection as a viable design. The impacts for each alternative shall be identified and expressed in a form suitable for comparison to other alternatives. It will be necessary to analyze in sufficient detail to identify enough differences to select the most viable corridor(s) that would be in the best overall public interest. The CONSULTANT shall document the results of the design analysis and provide a recommendation for the best design. Design Base Maps The CONSULTANT will draw Design Base Maps on Aerial Photography. The Base Maps will be Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 20 of 29 prepared at a scale of 1:20. 2.1 7 Traffic Analysis The CONSULTANT will use the data and information as developed in Section 2.6 to develop the following Documents: a. Traffic Report - This report will include the Project Traffic Forecasts as the input for developing concepts for all feasible alternatives. (1) The CONSULTANT shall evaluate the following scenarios in determining future mainline lane configurations for all corridors: i.) Existing Lane Configurations ii.) Currently Approved Master Plan Concepts and previous PD&E Configurations. This configuration should be reflected in the currently approved Long Range Transportation Plan for the MPO. This shall be reviewed and confirmed by the CONSULTANT with the ClTY and MPO. The CONSULTANT shall use the DDHV's as developed within the Project Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum to test the basic roadway mainline level of service for each alternative. The analysis will be consistent with procedures and techniques as defined by the 2000 HCM (or latest equivalent thereof). The results of the analysis will be summarized in text, table, and graphic format. Associated computer input and output sheet will be provided in a logically ordered appendix. In the event that all alternatives as provided above do not provide a minimum mainline LOS D condition, the CONSULTANT will have to evaluate multimodal options that will impact the proposed median envelope of all mainline alternative corridors. b. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Draft, Draft Final and Final Project Traffic and Concept Report for this project. The Project Traffic and Concept Report should include information defined below but will not omit all pertinent data, information, analyses and lane line diagrams to make a definitive decision as to a final overall concept plan for new or existing alternatives. (1) The CONSULTANT shall prepare lane line configuration (stick figure) drawings of all viable concepts and shall submit at least three mainline and intersection configuration diagrams to the ClTY for all the alternatives. This submittal will be entitled the Draft Project Traffic and Concept Report. It shall include but not be limited to an Executive Summary, the entire Project Traffic Forecast Technical Memorandum (appropriately integrated into this report), traffic volumes and analyses (level of service) determining mainline lane, and cross street requirements in text, tabular and graphic format (shown on the lane line configurations), median treatment plan with or without multi-modal considerations, anticipated typical section(s) and the lane line configuration diagrams with dimensions sufficient to create a concept plan. All appendix information from the Project Traffic Forecasts plus appendix information required by this additional report component will be included within this draft report submittal on CDIDVD. The CONSULTANT shall submit 5 hardcopies with appendix CDIDVD plus an electronic submittal with all components of the report in PDF, Word, original graphic file input, appendix information, electronic data files for level of service analyses will be included in the electronic submittal. The ClTY shall review and approve the Draft Project Traffic and Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 21 of 29 Concept Report. 2.1 8 Typical Section Analysis The CONSULTANT shall develop all appropriate typical section alternatives for the project. These will include the CITY's standard typical sections, and any typical sections that may result in minimizing right of way, and incorporating context sensitive solutions. 2.19 Roadway Design Alternatives The CONSULTANT shall identify, develop, and analyze up to three (3) feasible Design Alternatives as outlined in Part 1, Chapter 4 of the PD&E Manual. 2.20 Prepare Alternative Concept Plans The CONSULTANT will overlay Concept Plans on the base maps. 2.21 Drainage and Floodplain Analysis The CONSULTANT shall perform preliminary drainage design in order to determine potential outfall locations and preliminary sizes (volume and area) of required detention andlor retention facilities for storm water treatment or attenuation. The location and size of potential detentionlretention areas will be determined for all viable alternate alignments. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Drainage andlor Pond Siting Report, as applicable, for the project in accordance to the CITY'S Stormwater policies. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Location Hydraulics Report for the project in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 24 of the PD&E Manual. 2.22 Structures The CONSULTANT will evaluate conceptual structures vertical and horizontal alignments. 2.23 Access Management The CONSULTANT shall review the CITY's access management policies and determine their application to the project. The CONSULTANT shall determine the proper access classification and standard to be applied to the project. The proposed access management plan shall be presented as part of the public involvement process. If an Access Management Classification/Reclassification Public Hearing is required, it will be combined with another public meeting. 2.24 Multi-modal Accommodations The CONSULTANT will coordinate with transit and local government officials in order to determine what multi-modal accommodations will be studied and evaluated as part of the project alternatives. This task only includes existing and planned multi-modal facilities. 2.25 Maintenance of Traffic Analysis The CONSULTANT will analyze the design alternatives for constructability, and the ability to maintain traffic. If the constructability analysis indicates that there will be a substantial cost to maintain traffic, the cost estimate will be included in the cost estimate for that alternative. 2.26 Geotechnical Coordination This task is for the CONSULTANT to coordinate with the geotechnical staff regarding project requirements, review of geotechnical data, and scheduling. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November I 7, 201 0 Page 22 of 29 2.27 Intelligent Transportation Systems This item is not applicable for this project. 2.28 Utilities and Railroads Based on the coordination with the utility companies along the project the CONSULTANT shall prepare a Utility Assessment Package as described in Part 2, Chapter 10 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT will also address impacts to existing and proposed railroads. 2.29 Other Engineering Services IMRIIJR Reports Lighting Justification Report Other Design Services Comparative Analysis of Alternatives The CITY will determine which viable alternative(s) to further evaluate through the public involvement process and environmental analysis. The possibility exists that the No-Build alternative may be selected at this point. 2.30 Comparative Analysis and Evaluation Matrix After developing the viable alternatives and costs, the CONSULTANT will prepare a matrix comparing the impacts and costs of the alternatives evaluated, with a recommendation of the most viable alternative(s). The CONSULTANT shall present their recommendations to the CITY for consideration. 2.31 Selection of Preferred Alternative(s) The CONSULTANT shall recommend a preferred alternative(s) based on a review and analysis of all engineering, environmental, and public involvement issues related to the project. 2.32 Conceptual Design Plans (Preferred) The CONSULTANT will finalize concept plans for the preferred alternative that include refinements from the public hearing. 2.33 Identify Construction Segments The CONSULTANT shall analyze the preferred alternative and identify any construction segments that can be implemented. 2.34 Value Engineering Value Engineering is not required for this project. 2.35 Construction Cost Estimates The CONSULTANT shall develop construction cost estimates and updates for design alternatives. 2.36 Right Of Way Cost Estimates This item is not applicable for this project. 2.37 Typical Section Package The CONSULTANT will prepare the Typical Section Package in accordance with the FDOT Plans Preparation Manual (excluding pavement design). Pavement Type Selection Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/70 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 207 0 Page 23 of 29 (geotechnical and other support). 2.38 Design Exceptions and Variations: The CONSULTANT will identify and prepare exception and variations package(s) for approval in accordance with FDOT's Plan Preparation Manual. 2.39 Project Development Summary Report (PDSR) The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Project Development Summary Report (PDSR) to document the Project Development process. The PDSR shall be developed in accordance with Part I Chapter 4 of the PD&E Manual. 2.40 Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for ensuring that all work products conform to CITY standards and criteria. This shall be accomplished through an internal quality control process performed by the CONSULTANT. This quality control process shall insure that objective and qualified individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work achieve quality through checking, reviewing, and surveillance of work activities. Prior to submittal of the first invoice, the CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY'S Project Manager for approval the proposed method or process of providing quality control for all work products. The Quality Control Plan shall identify the products to be reviewed, the personnel who perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the inclusion of the Quality Assurance Checklist indicating the CONSULTANT'S quality control process has been completed. The CONSULTANT shall review all reports prepared by sub-consultants. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND REPORTS The CONSULTANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of environmental analysis for this project as outlined in the PD&E Manual and the following references. The CONSULTANT shall utilize the Programming Summary Report and graphical information from the Environmental Screening Tool (EST) available at http:llwww.dot.state.fl.us/emo, or other appropriate database. Data base information shall be compatible for use on base maps used for public presentations, corridor maps, and alternative plans. The level of effort for the following work activities shall be commensurate with the level of impact identified in the final Programming Summary Report. If the Summary Degree Of Effect from the Final Programming Summary Report is "No Involvement", or "None", for an activity, the activity will be marked NIA in the Scope of Services. Sociocultural Effects The CONSULTANT shall collect data regarding the following Sociocultural issues. Pertinent data shall be collected, analyzed and summarized in the appropriate section of the Project Development Summary Report (PDSR). Pertinent data shall also be displayed on the base map, as applicable. These issues shall be analyzed in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual and the Sociocultural Effects Evaluation Handbook (available at http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo). 3.4 Land Use Changes (NIA) The ETDM Screening has resulted in a Summary Degree of Effect of Moderate; however Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November I 7, 2010 Page 24 of 29 this section is not applicable. Issues identified as needing further study included the addition of the project into the City's Comprehensive Plan and in the Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Since the completion of the Programming Screen, the Project has been included in the 2035 LRTP. The project is funded in the TIP as follows: Fiscal Year (FY) 08/09 for PD&E; FY 09/10 for Final Design; and Construction is planned for 201 1. While this project is not specifically identified within the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Plan, it is consistent with the document due to the fact that both the LRTP and TIP are adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element. 3.2 Social The ETDM Screening has resulted in a Summary Degree of Effect of Minimal. Due to the limited presence of community features and residential uses within the immediate project vicinity of the preferred alternative, the proposed low-level bridge design including pedestrian and bicycle lanes, and the assurance in the Feasibility Study that the project must not adversely impact the accessibility of traffic into and out of existing establishments, the overall project effects on community character and cohesion are anticipated to be minimal. 3.3 Economic The ETDM Screening has resulted in a Summary Degree of Effect of Enhanced. The proposed West Avenue Bridge is anticipated to alleviate some traffic congestion along the Alton Road corridor and facilitate traffic flow through the area by providing a more direct connection to the Sunset Neighborhood, therefore linking residential and commercial businesses. Due to the anticipated economic benefits to the local economy, the degree of effect assigned to this issue is enhanced. 3.4 Mobility The ETDM Screening has resulted in a Summary Degree of Effect of Minimal. The proposed West Avenue Bridge is anticipated to help alleviate traffic congestion along Alton Road and along 17th Street, and would improve transit, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility and safety in the South Beach Neighborhood. Overall mobility within the area is anticipated to be enhanced as a result of the proposed improvement. Issues identified as needing further study include: Accessibilitv: transit facilities, intermodal connectivity, transportation disadvantaged access, residential to non-residential connectivity, bicycle and pedestrian issues, public parking, park and ride facilities, walkability, emergency response and evacuation routes, and safety. Traffic Studv: What is the current route that vehicles and bicycles take without the proposed bridge? A safety study needs to be performed as part of the PD&E Study. Are the intersections of Dade Boulevard and Bay Road a high crash location? The traffic study should consider the traffic from the planned developments. The intersection of the proposed bridge at both West Avenue at Dade Boulevard and Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November I 7, 2010 Page 25 of 29 West Avenue at 17th Street may have to be signalized. If it is signalized it will be in very close proximity to the signalized intersections on Dade Boulevard at Bay Road and Alton Road. On 17th Street it will be very closely spaced between the signalized intersections with Dade Boulevard and Alton Road. 3.5 Aesthetics The ETDM Screening has resulted in a Summary Degree of Effect of Moderate. Within the 500-foot buffer, there are 15 Florida Site File Historic Standing Structures and 2 FDOT RCI Bridges which could potentially be affected by the project. Based upon the surrounding land uses in the area, the proximity of bridges with similar characteristics and the low-level bridge conceptual design (which includes pedestrian and bicycle lanes), the project is not anticipated to affect the visual aesthetics of the neighborhood. However, due to the presence of Historic Standing Structures and FDOT RCI Bridges within the project area, impacts on community aesthetics as a result of this project are anticipated to be moderate. Potential aesthetic effects will be assessed further by the City of Miami Beach during Project Development as more detailed information becomes available. Potential noise and vibration effects will be evaluated per Volume II, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual. 3.6 Relocation Potential The ETDM Screening has resulted in a Summary Degree of Effect of Moderate. Due to the presence of cultural resources within the immediate project area and the identified potential effects to parcels within the vicinity of the project, potential relocation effects (at this time) are anticipated to be moderate. These effects will be assessed further during development of the final intersection design. Cultural Resources 3.7 Archaeological and Historic Resources The CONSULTANT shall implement a Cultural Resources study to completely analyze the impacts to all cultural resources by all proposed alternatives, including all viable ponds. All work shall be conducted by a professional qualified under the provisions of 36 CFR 61, and be done in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665, as amended) and the implementing regulations (36 CFR 800) as well as with the provisions contained in Chapter 267, Florida Statutes. This task includes identifying and analyzing impacts to archaeological sites and historic resources within the project Area of Potential Effects (APE), including documentation and coordination with appropriate agencies as per Part 2, Chapter 12 of the PD&E Manual, and the Department's Cultural Resource Management Handbook. In addition, attendance at public meetings may be required. The CONSULTANT will also review and address any resources listed in the Environmental Screening Tool (EST) by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Environmental Technical Advisory Team (ETAT) member. (work estimate should be based on number of identified sites.) a. Research Design Methodology: The CONSULTANT will prepare a Research Design and Survey Methodology for the project, to be submitted to the CITY for approval prior to the initiation of field work. The CONSULTANT shall identify and map out the zones of Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November I 7, 201 0 Page 26 of 29 probability for the project study area, and identify any previously recorded resources. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) will be determined (including pond sites). b. Cultural Resources Assessment Survey (CRAS) Field Work: The CONSULTANT shall identify any archaeological sites within the project area, both previously recorded and potentially eligible, and excavate the appropriate number of test pits. The CONSULTANT shall identify any existing historic resources within the project area, both previously recorded and potentially eligible. The CONSULTANT will also locate, identify and bound any additional cultural resources included on the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) and all structures 45 to 50 years older (depending upon the length of time anticipated before construction). Enough data will be collected to document each site's significance in terms of eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Documentation: The CRAS will be prepared with appropriate documentation detailing the results of the survey and the final assessments of resource significance, and including a FMSF form for all identified resources. The Research Design Methodology and the Pond Site Technical Memo will be included in the CRAS appendix. c. Pond Site Technical Memorandum: The CONSULTANT will identify and clear pond sites for the preferred project alternative. The results of this work are to be documented in a technical memorandum, which will be included as an appendix to the CRAS. d. Determination of Eligibility (DOE): If required, the CONSULTANT will prepare a DOE for each resource determined to be significant. The DOE package will include an NRHP registration form, and the DOE'S will be included as a CRAS appendix. e. Case Study Report: If required, a Section 106 Case Study Report, documenting the application of the Criteria of Effect, will be prepared. f. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA): The CONSULTANT will assist the DEPARTMENT with the preparation of a Section 106 MOA, if required. g. Section 4(9 Evaluation: The CONSULTANT will prepare and coordinate a Section 4(9 Evaluation, if required. (This document may be separate from the parks and recreation 4(f) document. See section 3.8) The District needs to determine need for separate document h. Section 106 Consultation Meetings: The CONSULTANT will assist the CITY with coordination of a Section 106 Consultation meeting, if required. i. Native American Coordination: If required, the CONSULTANT will assist the CITY with coordination with any Native American tribes that have or wish to have involvement or input on the project or any site of relevance to them. j. Section 106 Public Involvement: If required, the CONSULTANT will assist the CITY with public involvement for Section 106. 3.8 Section 4(f) In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 13 of the PD&E Manual. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 27 of 29 Natural Resources 3.9 Wetlands and Essential Fish Habitat In accordance with Part 2, Chapters 11 and 18 of the PD&E Manual. This includes a Conceptual Mitigation Plan, if applicable. 3.10 Water Quality In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 20 of the PD&E Manual. 3.11 Special Designations In accordance with Part 2, Chapters 19, 21, 23, and 26 of the PD&E Manual, respectively Outstanding Florida Waters Wild And Scenic Rivers Aquatic Preserves Coastal Barrier Resources 3.12 Wildlife and Habitat In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 27 of the FDOT PD&E Manual. 3.13 Identify Permit Conditions The CONSULTANT shall identify permit conditions, and type of permits required. This task includes the review of maps and data in order to determine permit related information for the project or add scope to identify what tasks should be done in accordance with agreements with the permitting agencies. For projects where permits are required as part of the PD&E Study, see Section 4.3. 3.14 Farmlands In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 28 of the PD&E Manual. Physical 3.15 Noise In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual. 3.16 Air Quality In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/70 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 20f0 Page 28 of 29 3.1 7 Construction Impact Analysis In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 30 of the PD&E Manual. 3.1 8 Contamination The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete the Contamination Screening Evaluation for all viable alternatives, and complete the Contamination Screening Evaluation Report as described in Part 2, Chapter 22, of the PD&E Manual. Environmental Reports The Environmental Documents prepared by the CONSULTANT will comply with the procedures listed in the PD&E Manual, Part I, and will also follow the format and include content described in Part 2 of the PD&E Manual. The task of documentation includes the preparation of draft and interim reports prepared by the CONSULTANT for review and comment upon by the ClTY prior to producing final reports and documents. 3.19 Class of Action Determination A Type 2 Categorical Exclusion is the expected level of environmental documentation required for this project. The CONSULTANT will complete the Environmental Determination Form to document the Categorical Exclusion as described in Part 1, Chapter 5, of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT will also provide all the documentation required by the PD&E Manual. 3.20 Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for insuring all work products conform to the CITY'S standards. 4.0 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 4.1 Contract and Project Files Project Management efforts for complete setup and maintenance, developing monthly progress reports, schedule updates, work effort to develop and execute sub-consultant agreements etc. Progress reports shall be delivered to the CITY in a format as prescribed by the ClTY and no less than 10 days prior to submission of the corresponding invoice. The Project Manager will make judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished by comparing the reported percent complete against actual work accomplished. Within ten (I 0) days after the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall provide a schedule of calendar deadlines accompanied by an anticipated payout curve. Said schedule and anticipated payout curve shall be prepared in a format prescribed by the CITY. 4.2 Project Management Meetings and Coordination The CONSULTANT shall meet with the ClTY as needed throughout the life of the project. It is anticipated five (5) meetings will be needed. These meetings will include progress and miscellaneous review and other coordination activities with the CITY. Commission Memorandum - RFQ-48-09/10 - PD&E Study for the West Avenue Bridge Project November 17, 2010 Page 29 of 29 4.3 Additional Services Preparation of scope and staff hours for the additional services will involve reference to the Standard Scope of Services, Staff Hour Estimation Forms, and Staff Hour Estimation Basis for Highway and BridgeiStructures Design. Permitting is included during the PD&E Study on all or portions of the project. Permitting services may include consideration of the following sections of the Standard Design Scope of Services: 4. Roadway Analysis 5. Roadway Plans 6. Drainage Analysis 8. Environmental Permits 27. Survey 28. Photogrammetry 29. Mapping 30. Geotechnical 5.0 METHOD OF COMPENSATION Payment for the work accomplished will be in accordance with Exhibit B of this contract. Invoices shall be submitted to the CITY. The Project Manager and the CONSULTANT shall monitor the cumulative invoiced billings to insure the reasonableness of the billings compared to the project schedule and the work accomplished and accepted by the CITY. Payments will not be made that exceed the percentage of work identified in the approved payout curve and schedule provided in accordance with Section 4.1. 6.0 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE ClTY The ClTY will provide those services and materials as set forth below: Project data currently on file. All available information in the possession of the ClTY pertaining to utility companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction. All future information that is in possession or may come to the ClTY pertaining to subdivision plans, so that the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right-of-way. Process Advance Notification and all environmental and engineering documents including the Permit Coordination Package. Coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Officer. Existing ClTY right-of-way maps. A Legal Description of the project area and a "Sketch to Accompany a Legal Description". The ClTY will provide available Miami Beach Police Department crash data. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ClTY MANAGER, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 48-09/10, FOR THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIROMENT STUDY FOR THE WEST AVENUE BRIDGE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, GANNETT FLEMING, INC.; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE TOP-RANKED FIRM, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE WlTH THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM, T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL; AND SHOULD THE ADMINISTRATION NOT BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE SECOND-RANKED FIRM, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WlTH THE THIRD-RANKED FIRM, THE CORRADINO GROUP, INC. WHEREAS, on July 14, 2010, the Mayor and City Commission approved the issuance of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 48-09/10, for the project development and environment study for the West Avenue Bridge Project (the "RFQ"); and WHEREAS, the West Avenue Bridge Project (Project) proposes to construct a new bridge over the Collins Canal at West Avenue. The cross section of the bridge consists of two travel lanes, bi-directional bike lanes, and a sidewalk on each side of the road; and WHEREAS, the RFQ was issued on August 17, 2010, with an opening date of September 17,201 0; and WHEREAS, a pre-qualification meeting to provide information to prospective proposers was held on August 30,2010; and WHEREAS, Bidsync sent notices to 4,258 prospective proposers resulting in the receipt of four (4) proposals by BCC. Engineering, Inc., Corradino Group, Inc., Gannett Fleming, Inc., and T.Y. Lin International; and WHEREAS, the City Manager, via a Letter to Commission (LTC) No. 259-2010, appointed the following individuals as committee members: Christine Bettin, Transportation Coordinator, Public Works - Transportation Dat Huynh, P.E., District Project Development Engineer, FDOT Walter Miros, Miami Beach Resident, Leadership Academy Graduate Marcos Redondo, Project Manager, Miami-Dade County Public Works Betsy Wheaton, Environmental Specialist, Public Works - Storm Water WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee (the "Committee1') convened on October 15, 2010, to evaluate, score, and rank the proposals based on the evaluation criteria stated in the RFQ; and WHEREAS, the Committee invited each firm for presentations and interviews, and based on the scores and rankings of the Committee members, Gannett Fleming, Inc. was selected as the top-ranked firm, T.Y. Lin International was selected as the second-ranked firm, and the Corradino Group, Inc. as the third-ranked firm; and WHEREAS, after considering the review and recommendation of the Evaluation Committee, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and carefully considered the specifics of this RFQ process. As a result, the City Manager recommends to the Mayor and City Commission that the City enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm of Gannett Fleming, Inc. and to negotiate with the second-ranked firm of T.Y. Lin International should negotiations with the top-ranked firm be unsuccessful, and to negotiate with the third-ranked firm of the Corradino Group, Inc. should negotiations with the first or second-ranked firms be unsuccessful. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby accept the recommendation of the City Manager, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 48-09/10, for the project development and environment study for the West Avenue Bridge Project; authorizing the administration to enter into negotiations with the top-ranked firm of Gannett Fleming, Inc., and shout the administration not be able to negotiate with the top-ranked firm, authorizing the administration to negotiate with the second-ranked firm of T.Y. Lin International; and should the administration not be able to negotiate an agreement with the second-ranked firm, authorizing the administration to negotiate an agreement with the third-ranked firm of the Corradino Group, Inc. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 201 0. ATTEST: ClTY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE (k FOR EppJTION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, granting and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a perpetual utility easement to Florida Power and Light (FPL) to provide electrical service for a feeder vault on the site of the new Miami Beach Soundscape (Lincoln Park). Key Intended Outcome Supported: Ensure well-maintained infrastructure Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): NIA Issue: ( Shall the Mayor and the City Commission approve the Resolution? I Item Summary/Recommendation: On May 14, 2008, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2008-26814; authorizing a perpetual utility easement to Florida Power and Light (FPL) to provide electrical service for the construction of a feeder vault on the site of the New World Symphony Project (NWS). Recently, the New World Symphony requested that an additional easement be executed to provide electrical service to the new Miami Beach SoundScape (Lincoln Park). The new perpetual easement contains a relocated 13,000 volt line and two (2) new electrical manholes to serve the new Miami Beach SoundScape (Lincoln Park). The square footage of this new easement is approximately 6,862 square feet (0.157 acres).The new easement will include an interior vault and sub- surface conduits for maintenance purposes. See Attachment A. In order for FPL to schedule and place its electrical service, the City is required to execute a perpetual easement, which grants FPL access to service its equipment. I THE ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION. I Advisory Board Recommendation: I N/A 3 1 OBPl Total I Financial Impact Summary: Financial Information: City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: 1 Fernando Vazquez, Public Works 6399 Source of Funds: I Account 1 - r) Amount MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miarnibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17, 2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, GRANTING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE A PERPETUAL UTILITY EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FPL) TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR A FEEDER VAULT ON THE SITE OF THE NEW MIAMI BEACH SOUNDSCAPE (LINCOLN PARK). ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Approve the Resolution. FUNDING No funding is required. ANALYSIS On May 14, 2008, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2008-26814; authorizing a perpetual utility easement to Florida Power and Light (FPL) to provide electrical service for the construction of a feeder vault on the site of the New World Symphony Project (NWS). Recently, the New World Symphony requested that an additional easement be executed to provide electrical service to the new Miami Beach SoundScape (Lincoln Park). The new perpetual easement contains a relocated 13,000 volt line and two (2) new electrical manholes to serve the new Miami Beach SoundScape (Lincoln Park). The square footage of this new easement is approximately 6,862 square feet (0.1 57 acres).The new easement will include an interior vault and sub-surface conduits for maintenance purposes. See Attachment A. In order for FPL to schedule and place its electrical service, the City is required to execute a perpetual easement, which grants FPL access to service its equipment. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a perpetual utility easement in favor of FPL in order to allow the new Miami Beach SoundScape (Lincoln Park) to proceed to completion. Attachment: , legal description and easement szw JMGIJGGIFH T:\AGENDA\2010\November InConsent\NWS FPL easement MEMO.doc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MlAMl BEACH, FLORIDA, GRANTING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE A PERPETUAL UTILITY EASEMENT TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FPL) TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR A FEEDER VAULT ON THE SITE OF THE NEW MlAMl BEACH SOUNDSCAPE (LINCOLN PARK). WHEREAS, on May 14, 2008, the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2008-26814, authorizing a perpetual utility easement to Florida Power and Light (FPL) to provide electrical service for the construction of a feeder vault on the site of the New World Symphony Project (NWS); and WHEREAS, recently, the New World Symphony requested that an additional easement be executed to provide electrical service to the new City park being built in conjunction with the NWS project; and WHEREAS, the new perpetual easement contains a relocated 13,000 volt line and two (2) new electrical manholes to serve the Pennsylvania Avenue Parking Garage and NWS building; and WHEREAS, the square footage of this new easement is approximately 6,862 square feet (0.157 acres); new easement will also include an interior vault and sub-surface conduits for maintenance purposes; and WHEREAS, in order for FPL to schedule and place its electrical service, the City is required to execute a perpetual easement, which grants FPL access to service its equipment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MlAMl BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby grant and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached perpetual utility easement to Florida Power and Light (FPL) to provide electrical service for the replacement feeder vault on the site of the new Miami Beach Soundscape (Lincoln Park). PASSED and ADOPTED this day of ,2010 ATTEST: Robert E. Parcher, ClTY CLERK Matti Herrera Bower, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FO@@XECUTlON Attachment A 198 NER & ASSOCIATES, IN(=. SURVEYORS - MAPPERS 4341 S.W. 62nd Avenue Tel. (954) 585-0997 TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A FLORIDA POWER AND UOHT EASEMENT BUNG OF PORTION OF THE NORSH ONE-HALF (N 71/21 OF SECTON 34, TOWSHIP 53 SWW, RANGE 42 EAST, IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID EASEMENT BEING MORE PARflCUMLY DESCRIBIl) AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT ME: NORWEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 3, UNCOLN ROAD SUBDlMSlON "A: ACCORDING TO 7HE PLAT MEREQ: RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, PAOE 66 OF WE PUBUC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNT/, FLORIDA; THENCE s.~g.47~21*~., ALONG THE NORW LINE OF SAID BLOCK 3 AND 17s WSERLY EXTENSION (SAID UNE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH RIGHT-W-WAY UNE ChC UNCDLN LANE), A DISTANCE OF 374.46 FEET; WENCE N.0072'39"W.. A DISTANCE OF 51.64 FEER THENCE N.4574'552, A DISTANCE OF 22.07 FEE2 THENCE N.0421837"W., A DISTANCE OF 7.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S.83'05'232, A DlSANCE OF 23.06 M; MENCE S.8476'27%, A DISTANCE OF 34.06 FEET; MENCE S.84'58'4ONE., A DISTANCE OF 38.63 FEET; THENCE S.89'07'39"E,, A DISTANCE OF 31.34 FEE? THENCE N.88'55'42%, A DISTANCE OF 49.22 FEER THENCE N.8732'11%, A DISTANCE OF 4296 FEET; WENCE N.7521'23"E. A DlSTANCE OF 9.26 FEET; WENCE SW32'23"E., A DISTANCE OF 35.11 FEET; YHENCE N.03'01'52'W.. A DISTANCE OF 19.32 FEE TWENCE N.f8Y3'2lRW., A DISTANCE W 13.47 FEET; mmcE ~,~4rs*45-~,, A DSTANCE OF 14.71 FEEE WENCE S.E78'0BaW.. A DISTANCE oF 30.1 1 FEET; 7HENGE S.64W142'W., A DISTANCE OF 19.94 m; THENCE ~.89'42'45"W., A DISTANCE OF 6f77 FEET YHENCE N8971'3Z'W., A DISTANCE OF 4279 FEET: WENCE S.89'4?'16"W., A DlSTANCE W 37.91 FEET; XiENCE S.8630'01'W.. A DISTANCE OF 24.41 FEET; fnENCE S.80'54'4f"W.. A DISTANCE OF 32.04 FEET; THENCE S0421'37-E,, A DISTANCE OF 10.96 FEET M ?HE POINT Of BEGIINNING. SAID LANDS SIIUAE, LVNG AND BEING W'IFIIN THE CITY OF MIAMI-BEACH, MIAMI-DADE COLIN% R08IDA. CONTAINING 6,862 SQUARE FEU (0.157 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. 1. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON WAS NOT ABSTRACED FOR OWERSHIP, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. 2 THIS SKETCH IS -NOT VALID" nmour THE SIGNANRE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 3. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF S.89'47'21'K. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BLOCK 3. LINCOLN ROAD SUBDlVlSlON "A", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 34, PAGE 66 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE CWNTY, FLCLPIDA. 4. THlS SKETCH DOES NOT REPRESENT A RELD SURVEY. (THIS IS NOT A SURMY). 5. THIS SKETCH OF DESCRlPTlON WAS PREPARED BY THIS FIRM WITHOUT THE BENCflf OF A TITLE SEARCH. THE LEGAL DESCRIPnON SHOWN HEREON WAS AUTHORED BY STONER & ASSOCIATES. INC. 6. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS BASED UPON AS-BUILT INFORMAnON OF THE FPL LINES AS PROMDED BY DON J. SULLIVAN & ASSOCIATES JOB NUMBER 07-247, PERFORMED FOR MEGA-TREND UTILITY CONTRACTORS AND ALSO BY INFORMADON PROHDED IN CAD0 FILE BY HGCE, STRUCTURXLS ENGINEERS AND ALSO BASED UPON AS-BUILT INFORMAnON OF FPL LLlNES PER STONER k ASSOC. ON 11/04/09 WorkReauestNo. 2009-27271 EASEMENT - This Instrument Prepared By N 1 / 2 .Sets Twp =St Rge e2E Name: - Parcel I.D.- co.r\rarne:Stoner & (Maintained by County Appra~ser) Address: 4x1. S . W . 62 avenue Davle, FL 33314 Form 3722 (Stocked) Rev. 7\94 - PQ 1 of 1. The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of f 1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power & Light Company, its licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for fh~ construction, operation and maintenance of underground electric utility facilities (including transformers, cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) to be installed from time to time; with the right to reconstrucl, improve, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement as described in the following pages. See Exhibit "A" for easement description To ether with the right to permlt any other person, firm or corporation lo attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay cable an 3 conduit withln the easement and lo operate the same for commun~cat~ons purposes. the nght of ~ngress and e 7 ress to said remises at all times; and further grants, to the fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, if al a I, the, rjghts !ereinabove granted on the ,and heretofore described, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or hlghways adlolning or through said property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrument on ,20-. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of. City of Miami Beach (Gorporale's name) By: (Wilness' Signature) (- Print Name: pnnt Name: Matti Hexera Rower +Jlayor i (wrcness) Print Address: 1100 Dr 1 ve I a&. FT, 111 39 (Wrlness' s~gnature) Print Name: (Witness) Attest: (Seorelar)/s signature) Print Name: mt Parrher, Pi tly Clerk Print Address: 1 7 0 0 COnve- Drive Miami Beach, FL 337 39 (Corporate Seal) STATE OFFlorida, AND COUNTY OF j nn,& The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this - day of ,20-, by MaU H~rrera RCIWP~ , and _gDher.i-. Pa rrrh~r , 6 respectively the President and yC4 e$R I I Read , a corporation, on behalf of said corporation, who are personally known to me or have produced as identification, and who drd (did not) take an oath. (Type or Identifimtion) My Commission Expires: Notary Public, Signalure COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to submit a grant application to US HUD for NSP3 entitlement funds in an amount not to exceed $1,475,088 for the acquisition and rehabilitation of eligible properties for affordable housing for income-eligible residents; authorizing the appropriation of the NSP3 funds, the incurring of reimbursable pre-award costs, and authorizing the execution of all necessary documents related to this application. Key Intended Outcome Supported: I Increase access to workforce or affordable housing. I Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): Based on the 2009 Customer Satisfaction Survey, 38% of residents rated availability of workforce housing as acceptablelthe right amount. ssue: Shall the City submit its grant application for NSP3 entitlement funds, appropriate the use of the funds, and incur allowable pre-award costs pursuant to HUD rules? tern Summary1Recommendation: On October 20, 2010, the Citv received the U.S. Department of Housina & Urban Development Notice of Formula Allocations and 1 Program Requirements for ~ei~hborhood stabilization Program ~ormuia Grants (the HUD Notice), which outlines the allocation amounts, methods, and program requirements for the third round of Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding (NSP3). Under NSP3, the City will be granted $1,475,088 on a formula basis. HUD has instructed entitlement communities receiving NSP3 funds to immediately begin to prepare and submit their "action plan substantial amendments" (Plan) for their grant applications due to HUD by March 1, 201 1. The City's Plan should outline how we will carry out the NSP3 activities in the context of a comprehensive plan for the community's vision of how it can make its neighborhoods not only more stable, but also more sustainable, inclusive, competitive, and integrated into the overall metropolitan fabric, including access to transit, affordable housing, employers, and services. HUD encourages each local jurisdiction receiving an allocation to carefully consider its administrative capacity to use the funds within the statutory deadline. The HUD Notice grants permission to jurisdictions receiving a direct allocation of NSP3 funds to incur pre-award costs as if they were preparing to receive their first allocation. Therefore, NSP3 grantees will be allowed to incur costs necessary to develop the NSP3 substantial action plan amendment and undertake other administrative actions necessary to receive its grant, prior to the costs being included in the final plan. HUD has determined that an amount of up to ten (10) percent of the NSP3 grant may be used for general administrative and planning activities. NSP3-eligible strategies for the use of funds are: (A) Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon homes and residential properties, including such mechanisms as soft-seconds, loan loss reserves, and shared-equity loans for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. (8) Purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or re-develop such homes and properties. (C) Establish and operate land banks for homes and residential properties that have been foreclosed upon. (D) Demolish blighted structures (E) Redevelop demolished or vacant properties as housing. The Administration will be developing the City's recommended strategy for use of the funds in order to submit a timely amendment. The Administration requests authorization to submit a grant application to HUD for NSP3 funds in an amount not to exceed $1,475,088, for the acquisition and rehabilitation of eligible properties for affordable housing for income eligible residents, and further authorize the appropriation of the funds, allow the incurring of reimbursable pre-award costs, and authorize the execution of all necessary Financial Information: I ' NSP 2 OBPl Total Source of Funds: I Financial Impact Summary: I City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: I Anna Parekh x7260 Sign-Offs: - Amount I I Account Approved MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: f the City Commission FROM: DATE: November 17,201 0 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM ROUND THREE (NSP3) FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,475,088 FOR THE ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OF ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR INCOME-ELIGIBLE RESIDENTS; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF THE ABOVE FUNDS, THE INCURRING OF REIMBURSABLE PRE-AWARD COSTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BACKGROUND The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 provided for the development of certain programs to help stabilize neighborhoods and communities impacted by the high rate of foreclosures. With a goal of reducing blight created from abandoned properties, the first round of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) allocated funds through a formula basis to help communities address this issue. Each community developed a strategy to use the funds within specifically delineated program areas. The City chose to allocate its formula funds (provided to the City via the State) for the purchase of foreclosed multi-family housing. This approach was practical since the majority of our housing units are multi-family, but also allowed for us to expend the funds much quicker than other communities whose strategy involved multiple individual single family properties - resulting in a lengthy process to expend funds. These NSPl funds had a very aggressive expenditure timeline and, as a result of the City's success in expending these funds quickly, you may recall that the State made additional allocations to the City from the NSPl funds they recaptured from other cities. A total of $9.2 million was allocated to the City under NSPI, allowing for the purchase of three foreclosed buildings. All told, the three buildings will provide 60 units of affordable housing, including nine large units for families. City Commission Memorandum NSP3 November 17, 2010 Page 2 ANALYSIS On October 20, 2010, the City of Miami Beach received the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Notice of Formula Allocations and Program Requirements for Neighborhood Stabilization Program Formula Grants, originally established under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (the HUD Notice). The HUD Notice outlines the allocation amounts, methods, and program requirements for the third round of Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding (NSP3). Under NSP3, which is funded under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the City of Miami Beach will be granted $1,475,088 on a formula basis. Recipients of NSP3 funds are required to meet HUD-outlined goals and objectives by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunity, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. HUD has instructed entitlement communities receiving NSP3 funds to immediately begin to prepare and submit their action plan substantial amendments (Plan) in accordance with the HUD Notice by March 1, 201 1. The City's Plan should outline how we will carry out the NSP3 activities in the context of a comprehensive plan for the community's vision of how it can make its neighborhoods not only more stable, but also more sustainable, inclusive, competitive, and integrated into the overall metropolitan fabric, including access to transit, affordable housing, employers, and services. HUD encourages each local jurisdiction receiving an allocation to carefully consider its administrative capacity to use the funds within the statutory deadline. The HUD Notice grants permission to jurisdictions receiving a direct allocation of NSP3 funds to incur pre-award costs as if they were preparing to receive their first allocation. Therefore, NSP3 grantees will be allowed to incur costs necessary to develop the NSP3 substantial action plan amendment and undertake other administrative actions necessary to receive its grant, prior to the costs being included in the final plan. HUD has determined that an amount of up to ten (10) percent of the NSP3 grant may be used for general administrative and planning activities; any pre-grant administrative expenses would be funded from this percentage. NSP3-eligible strategies for the use of funds are: (A) Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed upon homes and residential properties, including such mechanisms as soft-seconds, loan loss reserves, and shared-equity loans for low- and moderate-income homebuyers. (B) Purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or re-develop such homes and properties. (C) Establish and operate land banks for homes and residential properties that have been foreclosed upon. (D) Demolish blighted structures (E) Redevelop demolished or vacant properties as housing. With regular entitlement funds, a Citizen Participation Plan must be submitted before the entitlement community submits its annual Action Plan to HUD. To expedite the process and to City Commission Memorandum NSP3 November 17, 2010 Page 3 ensure that the NSP3 grants are awarded in a timely manner, while preserving reasonable citizen participation, HUD is waiving the requirement that NSP3 grantees follow its citizen participation plan for this substantial amendment. HUD is shortening the minimum time for citizen comments and requiring the substantial amendment or abbreviated plan to be posted on the grantee's official Web site as the materials are developed, published, and submitted to HUD. Proposed action plan amendments or abbreviated plans must be published via usual methods and on the Internet for no less than 15 calendar days of public comment. Under NSP3, and unlike under NSPI, grantees must use the HUD Foreclosure Need Web site to submit to HUD the locations of its NSP3 areas of greatest need. On this site, HUD provides estimates of foreclosure need and a foreclosure-related needs score at the Census Tract level. The NSP3 expenditure timelines are tighter than under NSPI. HUD is requiring that 50 percent of the allocation be expended within two years of receipt of the funds and 100 percent of the allocation within three years of receipt of the funds or HUD will recapture and reallocate the amount of funds not expended or provide for other corrective action@) or sanction. A grantee will be deemed by HUD to have received its grant at the time HUD signs its grant agreement. At this time, the City Administration has not developed a recommendation on the strategy for use of these funds, pending further review of eligibility criteria. As the City's proposed action plan for use of NSP3 funds is developed, the Administration will bring the recommendation to the City Commission for discussion, review and approval. A copy of the 27-page notice from HUD for the NSP3 program is available, should you like a COPY. CONCLUSION The Administration requests authorization to submit a grant application to HUD for NSP3 funds in an amount not to exceed $1,475,088 for the acquisition and rehabilitation of eligible properties for affordable housing for income-eligible residents, and further authorize the appropriation of the funds, allow the incurring of reimbursable pre-award costs, and authorize the execution of all necessary documents related to this application. RESOLUTIONS TO BE SUBMITTED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: I Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Lease Agreement 1 between the City and Mystery Park Arts Company d/b/a So Be Music Company, Inc., dated January 13,2010, for use of the two City-owned buildings, commonly known as the Carl Fisher Club House and Little Stage Theater, located at 2100 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida, said Amendment providing for a reduction of the Tenant's monthly rent for a period of five (5) months, commencing on December 1, 2010 and ending on April 30, 201 1. Key Intended Outcome Supported: Increase community rating of cultural activities and ensure well maintained facilities. I Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): Approximately 73% of residents surveyed in the 2009 survey, rank the availability of Miami Beach's cultural and recreational programs as excellent and good. Issue: I Shall the City Commission approve Amendment No. 1 to the Lease Agreement? 1 Item SummarylRecommendation: On January 13,2010, the City Commission approved a Lease Agreement with SoBe Arts for above-referenced City- owned facilities, providing for a five-year lease term with two renewal options of two years each at the City's sole discretion. The Base Rent is $1.20 per year and the Additional Rent to cover SoBe Arts' proportionate operating expenses is $10,464 per year, payable in monthly installments of $872 per month (calculated based on $500 for the Clubhouse and $372 for the Little Stage Theater). Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, the City also receives fifteen percent (15%) of any gross revenues derived from third party rentals of the facility. Prior to entering into the current Lease, SoBe Arts occupied the premises under a previous lease which expired on August 31,2009, but was extended on a month-to-month basis, pending negotiation of the current Lease. Under the previous lease, the Tenant was only paying rent for use of the Carl Fisher Club House, at a rate of $500 per month. On May 3lSt, 2009, the City Commission approved a letter agreement with SoBe Arts allowing it to utilize the Little Stage Theater to further its educational and programming needs, for an additional $372 per month in rent to offset its proportionate share of operating expenses. Leading up to the approval of the letter agreement, SoBe Arts assisted the City in identifying certain repairs and improvements that were necessary in order to make the space usable. Since the repairs extended well into its initial lease of the space, SoBe Arts couldn't use the space for approximately five months, but continued to remit rent during this period. SoBe Arts has requested a credit of rent paid during the renovation of the facility. On November 3,2010, the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee recommended a five (5) month reduction of the Additional Rent due in connection with the Little Stage Theater, whereby SoBe Arts shall be allowed to reduce it's monthly payment of Additional Rent by $372 per month, for the months of December 1,2010 through April 30,201 1. Advisory Board Recommendation: I Finance & Citywide Projects Committee: November 3, 2010 I 1 1 nla Financial Impact Summary: Financial Information: City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: I Anna Parekh, extension 7193 I Source of Funds: nla T:WGENDA\201O\November 17\Consent\SoBe Arts Amendment 1 .SUM.doc I Amount 1 Account AGENDA ITEM C 7 M DATE 11-17-18 MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of the City Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager et Jfis @ DATE: November 17, 201 0 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CIN COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING ANDAUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClN CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THAT CERTAIN LEASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE ClTY AND MYSTERY PARK ARTS COMPANY, INC., DATED JANUARY 13, 2010, FOR THE USE OF THE TWO CITY-OWNED BUILDINGS, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CARL FISHER CLUBHOUSE AND LITTLE STAGE THEATER, LOCATED AT 2100 WASHINGTON AVENUE, MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA; SAID AMENDMENT PROVIDING FOR A REDUCTION IN TENANT'S PAYMENT OF MONTHLY ADDITIONAL RENT, FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE (5) MONTHS, COMMENCING ON DECEMBER 1,2010, AND ENDING ON APRIL 30,201 1. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Increase resident satisfaction with the level of services and facilities. BACKGROUND On January 13,201 0, the City Commission approved a Lease Agreement with Mystery Parks Arts Company d/b/a SoBe Music Institute (SoBe Arts) for use of an approximately 3,080 square foot facility known as the Carl Fisher Clubhouse, located within the 21" Street Community Center Complex, 21 00 Washington Avenue, and the approximately 2,295 square foot building known as the "Little Stage Theater" located in the same complex. The Lease Agreement entitles SoBe to a five- year lease term with renewal options (two additional option terms of two years each) at the City's sole discretion. The Base Rent is $1.20 per year and the Additional Rent to cover SoBe Arts' proportionate operating expenses is $1 0,464 per year, payable in monthly installments of $872 per month (calculated based on $500 for the Clubhouse and $372 for the Little Stage Theater). Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, the City also receives fifteen percent (15%) of any gross revenues derived from third party rentals of the facility. ANALYSIS Prior to entering into the current Lease, SoBe Arts occupied the premises under a previous lease which expired on August 31, 2009, but was extended on a month-to-month basis, pending negotiation of the current Lease. Under the previous lease, SoBe Arts was only paying rent for use of the Carl Fisher Club House, at a rate of $500 per month. On May 31St, 2009, the City Commission approved a letter agreement with SoBe Arts allowing it to utilize the Little Stage Theater to further its educational and programming needs, for an additional $372 per month in rent to offset its proportionate share of operating expenses. It should be noted that leading up to the approval of Commission Memorandum Mystery Park Arts Lease November 17,2010 Page 2 of 2 the letter agreement, SoBe Arts assisted the City in identifying certain repairs and improvements that were necessary in order to make the space usable. Since the repairs extended well into its initial lease of the space, SoBe Arts couldn't use the space for approximately five months, but continued to remit rent during this period. SoBe Arts has requested a credit of rent paid during the renovation of the Little Stage Theater facility, which resulted in its inability to operate in the leased space during that time and generate necessary revenue to cover their expenses. A rent reduction or credit would require an amendment to the Lease Agreement. CONCLUSION At its November 3,2010 meeting, the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee considered SoBe Arts' request and is recommending a five (5) month reduction of the Additional Rent due in connection with the Little Stage Theater, whereby SoBe Arts shall be allowed to reduce its' monthly payment of Additional Rent by $372 per month, for the months of December I, 201 0 through April 30,201 1. Upon expiration of the five-month rent reduction period, and commencing on May 1,201 1, SoBe Arts shall resume its full payment of Additional Rent at $872 per month as delineated in the Lease Agreement. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MlAMl BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT NO. I TO THAT CERTAIN LEASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE ClTY AND MYSTERY PARK ARTS COMPANY, INC., DATED JANUARY 13,2010, FOR THE USE OF THE TWO CITY-OWNED BUILDINGS, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CARL FISHER CLUBHOUSE AND LITTLE STAGE THEATER, LOCATED AT 2100 WASHINGTON AVENUE, MlAMl BEACH, FLORIDA; SAID AMENDMENT PROVIDING FOR A REDUCTION IN TENANT'S PAYMENT OF MONTHLY ADDITIONAL RENT, FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE (5) MONTHS, COMMENCING ON DECEMBER 1,2010, AND ENDING ON APRIL 30,201 1. WHEREAS, on January 13, 2010, the Mayor and Commission adopted Resolution No. 2010-27305, approving a Lease Agreement with Mystery Parks Arts Company d/b/a SoBe Music Institute (SoBe Arts) for use of an approximately 3,080 square foot facility known as the Carl Fisher Clubhouse, located within the 21'' Street Community Center Complex, 2100 Washington Avenue, and the approximately 2,295 square foot building known as the "Little Stage Theater" located in the same complex, (the Lease Agreement), for an initial term commencing on January 13,201 0 and ending on January 12, 201 5; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Tenant is required to pay the sum of $872 in Additional Rent; and WHEREAS, SoBe Arts has requested a credit for the amount of rent paid, to compensate it for alleged disruption during the renovation of the Little Stage Theater facility that occurred between May and September, 2009, and which it alleges resulted in its inability to operate the facility and generate sufficient revenue to cover expenses; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2010, the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee recommended in favor of granting SoBe Arts a five (5) month reduction to its the monthly additional payments, which reduction requires an amendment to the Lease Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MlAMl BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 1 to that certain Lease Agreement by between the City and So Be Arts, dated January 13, 201 0, for the use of the two City-owned buildings, commonly known as the Carl Fisher Club House and Little Stage Theater, located at 2100 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida; said Amendment providing for a reduction of Tenant's of monthly additional rent payment, for a period of five (5) months, commencing on December 1,201 0, and ending on April 30,201 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of November, 2010. ATTEST: MAYOR ClTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTiON T:\AGENDA\2010\November InConsent\So Be Arts Amendment Reso,doc Date AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THAT CERTAIN LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA AND MYSTERY PARK ARTS COMPANY, INC. THIS AMENDMENT NO. I TO THE LEASE AGREEMENT made this 18'~ day of November, 2010, (the "Effectie Date"), between the ClTY OF MlAMl BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter called "City") having its principal address at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, and MYSTERY PARK ARTS COMPANY, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, having its principal address at 751 Euclid Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida, 331 39 (hereinafter called "Tenant"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on January 13, 2010, the Mayor and Commission adopted Resolution No. 2010-27305, approving a Lease Agreement with Mystery Parks Arts Company d/b/a SoBe Music Institute (SoBe Arts) for use of an approximately 3,080 square foot facility known as the Carl Fisher Clubhouse, located within the 21'' Street Community Center Complex, 2100 Washington Avenue, and the approximately 2,295 square foot building known as the "Little Stage Theater" located in the same complex, (the Lease Agreement), for an initial term commencing on January 13,2010 and ending on January 12,201 5; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Tenant is required to pay the sum of $872 in Additional Rent; and WHEREAS, SoBe Arts has requested a credit for the amount of rent paid, to compensate it for alleged disruption during the renovation of the Little Stage Theater facility that occurred between May and September, 2009, and which it alleges resulted in its inability to operate the facility and generate sufficient revenue to cover expenses; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2010, the Finance and Citywide Projects Committee recommended in favor of granting SoBe Arts a five (5) month reduction to its the monthly additional payments, which reduction requires an amendment to the Lease Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises of mutual covenants and conditions herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby conclusively acknowledged, it is agreed by the parties hereto to amend the Lease Agreement as follows: 1. Section 3, entitled "Rent" is amended as follows: (deleted language is and inserted language is underlined); 3.1 Base Rent Base Rent for the Demised Premises shall begin to accrue on the Commencement Date. In consideration of Tenant's request for a credit for the amount of Rent paid during the renovation of the Little Starre Theater facilitv, the Citv agrees to arant the Tenant a five (5) month reduction in Tenant's pavment of monthlv Additional Rent. Accordinglv, for the ~eriod commencing on December 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011, Tenant shall pav to the Citv the reduced amount of $500 in monthly Additional Rent. Commencina on Mav 1, 201 1, Tenant shall resume its full pavment of Additional Rent, in the amount of $872 per month. 2. Except as amended hereby, the Lease Agreement remains in full force and effect and is reconfirmed for all purposes. IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the parties have set their hands and seals the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA City Clerk Mayor ATTEST: MYSTERY PARK ARTS COMPANY, INC. Secretary President Print Name Print Name T:\AGENDAVOI O\November 17\Consent\SO BE Arts Amendrnent.doc APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, authorizing the acceptance of $62,500 donation from the Miami Beach Arts Trust for a new cultural grants program. Key Intended Outcome Supported: I Maximize Miami Beach as a destination brand. I Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): According to the 2009 Survey, on average, residents attended cultural activities 10.61 times per month and family friendly activities 7.19 times per month. Additionally, 24.2 % of residents said the City should strive not to reduce arts and culture. Issue: Shall the City accept the donation of $62,500 from the Miami Beach Arts Trust for the creation of a new cultural grants program to be administered by the Cultural Arts Council? Item SummarylRecommendation: The first Miami Beach Arts Gala was held on October 23,2010 in the Miami Beach Convention Center. A private event spearheaded by Commissioner Libbin, its stated purpose was to raise funds to be administered by the Cultural Arts Council as an additional cultural grants program to be known as the Miami Beach Arts Gala Grants. The Miami Beach Arts Trust, a private, not-for-profit Florida corporation, served as fiscal agent for the Gala. The Gala raised $65,782. Pursuant to a discussion between the Administration and the Chairperson of the 201 1 Arts Gala, Ray Breslin, $3,282 will be held in escrow as seed funding for the 201 1 Gala. Therefore, $62,500 is being donated to the City for a new dedicated cultural grants program. The Miami Beach Arts Gala Grants will be administered by the Cultural Arts Council in a manner consistent with the City's established policies and procedures. It is recommended the Mayor and City Commission approve the resolution. Advisory Board Recommendation: I The Cultural approved the acceptance of the donation at its meeting on November 4,2010. 1 I Financial Impact Summary: NIA I Financial Information: -- -- City Clerk's Office Legislative Tracking: I Max Sklar, Ext 61 16 Sign-Offs: Source of Funds: Amount 1 Account 2 OBPl Total MIAMIBEACH Cil-y of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33 139, www.rniamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of theJity Commission FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November 17,2010 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF SIXTY-TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($62,500) DONATION FROM THE MIAMI BEACH ARTS TRUST RESULTING FROM THE PROCEEDS OF THE FIRST ANNUAL MlAMl BEACH ARTS GALA; AND FURTHER APPROPRIATING SAID FUNDS FORTHE CREATION OF A NEW DEDICATED CULTURAL GRANTS PROGRAM WHICH WILL BE ADMINISTERED BY THE CULTURAL ARTS COUNCIL CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S ESTABLISHED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution ANALYSIS The 2010 Miami Beach Arts Gala (Gala) was held on October 23, 2010 in the Miami Beach Convention Center. A private event spearheaded by Commissioner Jerry Libbin, its stated purpose was to raise funds to be administered by the Miami Beach Cultural Arts Council (CAC) as an additional cultural grants program to be known as the Miami Beach Arts Gala Grants. The Miami Beach Arts Trust, a private, not-for-profit Florida Corporation, served as fiscal agent for the Gala. The Gala raised $65,782. Pursuant to a discussion between the Administration and the Chairperson of the 201 1 Arts Gala, Ray Breslin, $3,282 will be held in escrow as seed funding for the 201 1 Gala. Therefore, $62,500 is being donated to the City for a new dedicated cultural grants program. As outlined by Commissioner Libbin and the Arts Gala Committee, the Miami Beach Arts Gala Grants will support cultural programs and projects in the City of Miami Beach, with an emphasis on providing aid to neighborhood arts groups and on increasing access to the arts for Miami Beach residents and visitors. Qualified 501(c)(3) organizations with annual budgets less than $350,000 may apply for minimum grant awards of $5,000 for projects and programs occurring within the current fiscal year. There is no matching fund requirement. In place of a formal application, interested organizations may submit a 150-word summary of the proposed project, along with proof of valid 501 (c)(3) status via e- mail. The CAC will review all qualifying submissions. Selected projects will be referred to Cultural Affairs Program staff for complete vetting and processing. The CAC's final approval and grant award recommendations, subject to approval by the Mayor and Commission, will be made prior to the commencement of the regular CAC grants cycle in February. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends the adoption of the attached Resolution authorizing the acceptance of these funds. RESOLUTION TO BE SUBMITTED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY Condensed Title: A Resolution To Award A Contract, Pursuant To Invitation To Bid No. 43-09/10, For The Right-of-way Infrastructure Improvement Program - Neighborhood No. 13A - Star Island, Authorizing The Mayor And City Clerk To Execute An Agreement With Trans Florida Development Corp., At The Not-to-Exceed Amount of $696,887.45, For The Construction Of The Project, Plus Approve A Project Contingency In The Amount Of $69,688.75 For A Grand Total Of $766,576.20; $563,131.54 From Funds Previously Appropriated In The Capital Budget; And Appropriate $203,444.66 From Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line of Credit, With Such Funds To Be Repaid From Proposed Future Stormwater Bonds; Further Authorizing The Administration To Engage In Value Engineering To Further Reduce The Cost And Time For Completion Of Said Project. Key Intended,Outcome Supported: I Ensure well-maintained infrastructure Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc.): I The 2007 Communitv Satisfaction Survey noted 82% of North Beach residents rated recent capital ~roiects I . - I completed as "excelle;lt" or "good" compareb to 89% of residents citywide. Issue: I Shall the City Commission adopt the resolution? 1 Item SummarylRecommendation: The work comprises of, but not be limited to, paving, grading, milling, and resurfacing of roadway, construct new pavement (base and sub-base), installation of valley gutters and concrete pavers at guard house, landscape lighting, and water line improvements on East and West Star Island Drives in Star Island. ITB No. 43-09/10 was issued on September 24, 2010, with an opening date of October 25, 2010. The pre-bid conference was held on October 7, 2010. During the pre-bid conference, prospective bidders were instructed on the procurement process and the information their respective proposals should contain. Bidsync issued bid notices to 2,068 prospective bidders which resulted in the receipt of ten (10) bids. On November 1, 2010, the TRP convened to shortlist bidders based on the following criteria: 50 Points - Grand Total Base Bid Amount 0 10 Points - Risk Assessment PlanNalue Added Submittals 20 Points - Past Performance Evaluation Surveys On November 3, 2010, the TRP reconvened to interview the shortlisted bidders based on the following criteria: 20 Points - Presentation and interview of key personnel Upon completion of the interviews, the TRP discussed their individual perceptions of each prospective bidder's qualifications, experience, and competence to score and rank the firms accordingly. Trans Florida Development Corp. received three of five first-place votes for contract award. Trans Florida Development Corp. is a state-certified Underground Utility and Excavation Contractor for 13 years and has been directly involved in land development for commercial, residential and public projects, such as roadways, bridges, street lighting, storm water drainage systems, water distribution systems, sanitary sewer systems, and sewage lift stations. Trans Florida Development Corp. was recently awarded a contract by the City for South Pointe Phases Ill, IV, and V for ROW improvements as well as for job order contracting - streetscape utilities construction projects. After considering the review and recommendation of City staff, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and carefully considered the specifics of this ITB process. As a result, the City Manager recommends to the Mayor and City Commission to award the contract to Trans Florida Development Corp. ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Advisory Board Recommendation: I I I I Financial Information: I Source of Funds: OBPl w City Clerk's Office Legisladve Tracking: 1 2 3 ' 4 5 6 Total $766,976.20 Amount $348,253.75 $1 84,949.69 $163,684.01 $34,825.38 $18,494.97 $16,368.40 Account 384-2337-069357 - Fund 384 - 2003 GO Bonds - Neighborhoods 429-2337-069357 - Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line of Credit 420-2337-069357 - Fund 420 Water & Sewer GBL Series 201 0 384-2337-000356 - Fund 384 - 2003 GO Bonds - Neighborhoods 429-2337-069356 - Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line of Credit , 420-2337-069356 - Fund 420 Water & Sewer GBL Series 2010 Approved MIAMIBEACH City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 331 39, www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and Members of tp City Commission I FROM: Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager DATE: November17,2010 v SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING A CONTRACT AWARD, PURSUANT TO INVITATION TO BID NO. 43-0911 0, FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 13A - STAR ISLAND, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WlTH TRANS FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT CORP., AT THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $696,887.45, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, PLUS APPROVE A PROJECT CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $69,688.75 FOR A GRAND TOTAL OF $766,576.20; $563,131.54 FROM FUNDS PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED IN THE CAPITAL BUDGET; AND FURTHER APPROPRIATING $203,444.66 FROM FUND 429 STORMWATER PROJECTS LINE OF CREDIT, WlTH SUCH FUNDS TO BE REPAID FROM PROPOSED FUTURE STORM WATER BONDS; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENGAGE IN VALUE ENGINEERING TO FURTHER REDUCE THE COST AND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF SAID PROJECT. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Approve the award of contract. KEY INTENDED OUTCOMES SUPPORTED Ensure well-maintained facilities. FUNDING A total of $563,131.54 has been previously appropriated in the Capital Budget and $203,444.66 to be appropriated from Fund 429, Stormwater Projects Line of Credit, for a grand total of $766,576.20, as follows $348,253.75 384-2337-069357 - Fund 384 - 2003 GO Bonds - Neighborhoods $184,949.69 429-2337-069357 - Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line of Credit $163,684.01 420-2337-069357 - Fund 420 Water & Sewer GBL Series 2010 $34,825.38 384-2337-000356 - Fund 384 - 2003 GO Bonds - Neighborhoods for Contingency $18,494.97 429-2337-069356 - Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line of Credit for Contingency $16,368.40 420-2337-069356 - Fund 420 Water & Sewer GBL Series 2010 for Contingency $766,576.20 Total Commission Memorandum - ITB-43-09/10 - Star lsland ROW Improvements November 17, 2010 Page 2 of 4 ANALYSIS Stormwater runoff from Star Island, a 54-acre residential neighborhood, currently drains through a combination of surface, subsurface, and direct discharge type systems. A portion of the runoff from residential properties infiltrates the ground through private landscape areas and lawns. The remaining runoff flows into the right-of-way and ultimately the City's storm drainage system. The island has an existing stormwater subsurface drainage system primarily consisting of inlets and subsurface drainage structures located along the inside swale, parallel to the park, along East and West Star lsland Drives, as well as a portion of the area on the island's north end, which is served by a network of catch basins and pipes that discharge the stormwater directly to Biscayne Bay without pre-treatment. The firm of EDAW was retained to prepare the Basis of Design Report (BODR) which outlines the planning process and the recommended improvements for the various budget items identified for each neighborhood. The BODR for the Star lsland Neighborhood was approved by the City Commission on May 8, 2002. Since then, the BODR has been revised to include resident, Finance and City Projects Committee, and Capital lmprovement Projects Oversight Committee feedback. On January 22, 2008, the engineering firm of CAP Government, an A&E firm under the City's A&E rotational list, was assigned to the design and construction administration work for the Star lsland Right-of-way Infrastructure lmprovement Project. SCOPE OF SERVICES The work comprises of, but not be limited to, paving, grading, milling, and resurfacing of roadway, construct new pavement (base and sub-base), installation of valley gutters and concrete pavers at guard house, landscape lighting, and water line improvements on East and West Star lsland Drives in Star Island. BID PROCESS ITB No. 43-09/10 was issued on September 24, 2010, with an opening date of October 25, 2010. The pre-bid conference was held on October 7, 2010. During the pre-bid conference, prospective bidders were instructed on the procurement process and the information their respective proposals should contain. Bidsync issued bid notices to 2,068 prospective bidders which resulted in the receipt of the following ten (1 0) bids: Central Florida Equipment Rentals, Inc. Horizon Contractors, Inc. Florida Engineering & Development Corp. JVA Engineering Contractor, Inc. M. Vila & Associates, Inc. Miguel Lopez Jr., Inc. Quality Construction Performance, Inc. Southeastern Engineering Contractors, Inc. Trans Florida Development Corp. Williams Paving Co., Inc. Commission Memorandum - ITB-43-09/10 - Star Island ROW Improvements November 17, 2010 Page 3 of 4 Through the Procurement Division's review of each bid for responsiveness, Quality Construction Performance, Inc., the sixth (6th) highest bidder at $944,874.33 was disqualified for failing to submit a bid tender form as part of their bid. As a result, the following table provides the proposed lump sum bid prices of the nine (9) responsive bids: The Technical Review Panel (TRP) consisted of the following individuals: Janette Fernandez-Arencibia, Capital Project Coordinator, CIP Office Rhonda Gracie, Landscape Project Coordinator, Parks Department Emanuel Mayer, Special Assistant to the City Manager, City Manager's Office Thomas Mooney, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department Roberto Rodriguez, Capital Project Coordinator, CIP Office On November 1, 2010, the TRP convened to shortlist bidders based on the following criteria: 50 Points - Grand Total Base Bid Amount 10 Points - Risk Assessment PlanNalue Added Submittals 20 Points - Past Performance Evaluation Surveys As a result of the shortlisting process, the TRP invited the following companies for interviews: Central Florida Equipment Rentals, lnc. M. Vila & Associates, Inc. 0 Trans Florida Development Corp. Williams Paving Co., Inc. On November 3, 2010, the TRP reconvened to interview the shortlisted bidders based on the following criteria: 20 Points - Presentation and interview of key personnel Upon completion of the interviews, the TRP discussed their individual perceptions of each prospective bidder's qualifications, experience, and competence to score and rank the firms Commission Memorandum - ITB-43-09/10 - Star Island ROW lmprovements November 17, 2010 Page 4 of 4 accordingly. Trans Florida Development Corp, received three of five first-place votes for contract award as noted below: -Williams paving Co., Inc. 80 (3) 1 88 (3) 1 89 (3) 1 78 (3) 1 89 (3) 1 424 1 71(4) Cent. Florida E qp ui ment Rentals, Inc. 162(4)164(4)166(4)1 70 (4 ) I 333 Janette Fernandez-Arencibia and Thomas Mooney noted that M. Vila & Associates, Inc. provided an excellent and well-prepared interview which earned them their first-place votes. However, they stated that Trans Florida Development Corp. is fully qualified to manage this project and supported the Panel's recommendation. Trans Florida Development Cor~. Trans Florida Development Corp. is a state-certified Underground Utility and Excavation Contractor for 13 years and has been directly involved in land development for commercial, residential and public projects, such as roadways, bridges, street lighting, storm water drainage systems, water distribution systems, sanitary sewer systems, and sewage lift stations. Trans Florida Development Corp. recently completed a sanitary sewer and water distribution project in Key Biscayne, which included the replacement of 23,000 LF of water main and over 27,000 LF of sanitary sewer with a lift station and force main. The project also included restoration of streets, swales, roundabouts, sidewalks and driveways. Trans Florida Development Corp. was also recently awarded a contract by the City for South Pointe Phases Ill, IV, and V for ROW improvements as well as for job order contracting - streetscape utilities construction projects. CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW After considering the review and recommendation of City staff, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and carefully considered the specifics of this ITB process. As a result, the City Manager recommends to the Mayor and City Commission to award the contract to Trans Florida Development Corp. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission adopt the attached resolution, which awards a contract to Trans Florida Development Corp. as the lowest and best responsive bidder, pursuant to Invitation to Bid 43-09/10, for the right-of-way infrastructure improvement program - Neighborhood No. 13A - Star Island, based on a total not-to-exceed lump sum of $696,887.45; plus approve a project contingency in the amount of $69,688.75 for a grand total of $766,576.20; $563,131.54 is from funds previously appropriated in the capital budget; and $203,444.66 to be appropriated from Fund 429 Stormwater Projected Line of Credit, with such funds to be repaid from proposed future storm water bonds; and further authorize the Administration to engage in value engineering to further reduce the cost and time for completion of said project. T:\AGENDA\201O\November 17\Consent\lTB 43-09-10 - Star Island ROW lmprovements - MEMO.docx RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING A CONTRACT AWARD, PURSUANT TO INVITATION TO BID NO. 43-09/10, FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - NEIGHBORHOOD NO. 13A - STAR ISLAND, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND ClTY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WlTH TRANS FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT CORP., AT THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $696,887.45, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, PLUS APPROVE A PROJECT CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $69,688.75 FOR A GRAND TOTAL OF $766,576.20; $563,131.54 FROM FUNDS PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED IN THE CAPITAL BUDGET; AND FURTHER APPROPRIATING $203,444.66 FROM FUND 429 STORMWATER PROJECTS LINE OF CREDIT, WlTH SUCH FUNDS TO BE REPAID FROM PROPOSED FUTURE STORM WATER BONDS; FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO ENGAGE IN VALUE ENGINEERING TO FURTHER REDUCE THE COST AND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF SAID PROJECT. WHEREAS, Invitation to Bid (ITB) No. 43-09/10 was issued on September 24, 2010, with an opening date of October 25, 2010; and WHEREAS, Bidsync issued bid notices to 2,068 prospective bidders, which resulted in the receipt of the following ten (10) bids: Central Florida Equipment Rentals, Inc. Horizon Contractors, Inc. Florida Engineering & Development Corp. JVA Engineering Contractor, Inc. M. Vila & Associates, Inc. Miguel Lopez Jr., Inc. Quality Construction Performance, Inc. Southeastern Engineering Contractors, Inc. Trans Florida Development Corp. Williams Paving Co., Inc.; and WHEREAS, the City Manager appointed a Technical Review Panel (TRP), which consisted of the following individuals: Janette Fernandez-Arencibia, Capital Project Coordinator, CIP Office Rhonda Gracie, Landscape Project Coordinator, Parks Department Emanuel Mayer, Special Assistant to the City Manager, City Manager's Office Thomas Mooney, Preservation and Design Manager, Planning Department Roberto Rodriguez, Capital Project Coordinator, CIP Office; and WHEREAS, on November I, 2010, the TRP convened to shortlist bidders based on the following criteria: 50 Points - Grand Total Base Bid Amount 10 Points - Risk Assessment PlanNalue Added Submittals 20 Points - Past Performance Evaluation Surveys; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2010, the TRP reconvened to interview the shortlisted bidders based on the following criteria: 20 Points - Presentation and interview of key personnel; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the interviews, the TRP discussed their individual perceptions of each prospective bidder's qualifications, experience, and competence to score and rank Trans Florida Development Corp. as the lowest and best bidder; and WHEREAS, after considering the review and recommendation of City staff, the City Manager exercised his due diligence and concurs with the recommendation of the TRP. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND ClTY COMMISSION OF THE ClTY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, hereby approve a contract award, pursuant to Invitation to Bid (ITB) No. 43-0911 0, for the Right-of-way Infrastructure Improvement Program - Neighborhood No. 13A - Star Island; authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute and agreement with Trans Florida Development Corp., at the not-to-exceed amount of $696,887.45, for the construction of the project, plus approve a project contingency in the amount of $69,688.75 for a grand total of $766,576.20; $563,131.54 from funds previously appropriated in the Capital Budget; and further appropriating $203,444.66 from Fund 429 Stormwater Projects Line of Credit, with such funds to be repaid from proposed future storm water bonds; further authorizing the Administration to engage in value engineering to further reduce the cost and time for completion of said project. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2010. ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUTION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK