Loading...
Resolution 2025-33735 2025-33735 Resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCY COMMITTEE, AT ITS MARCH 26, 2025 MEETING, DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO PROCEED WITH SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ON WASHINGTON AVENUE FROM LINCOLN ROAD TO 15TH STREET, EASTAND WEST SIDEWALKS, USING BRICK PAVERS, IN THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $1.05 MILLION, FUNDED UNDER THE GENERAL OBLIGATION (GO) BOND FUND. WHEREAS, on June 26, 2024, at the request of Commissioner Kristen Rosen-Gonzalez, co-sponsored by Commissioners Joseph Magazine, David Suarez, Alex Fernandez, and Tanya Bhatt, the Mayor and City Commission ("City Commission") approved referral item C4C, to the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee ("FERC") meeting, to discuss beautitying Washington Avenue by enhancing lighting and sireelscaping; and WHEREAS, there had been similar requests brought up for discussion by Ciry Commission members at the Public Safety and Quality of Life Committee("PSNQLC")and FERC meetings to enhance lighting on South Beach, however, neither request resulted in favorable recommendations to the City Commission for approval, due to costs for installation and maintenance exceeding $1 Million; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2024, FERC members were provided sidewalk and lighting updates along Washington Avenue; and WHEREAS, Public Works presented two proposals for wrap-around lights on median lrees for the east and wesl sidewalks, including maintenance costs for a period of one year after ins[allation; and WHEREAS, Public Works reiterated at Committee that funding for the proposed wrap- around lights had yet to be identified; and WHEREAS, there was also a discussion aboul the $10 Million GO Bond fund as part of the Washington Avenue Corridor Project; and WHEREAS, said funding would be used to invest in capital improvements, permanenl lighting and landscaping along Washington Avenue�, and WHEREAS, wrap-around lights, however, since considered temporary fixtures, would not be eligible for GO Bond funding; and WHEREAS, discussions at Committee continued, focusing on how to reenergize Washinglon Avenue short and long term, using GO Bond funds; and WHEREAS, discussions also addressed the need to include lhe Washington Avenue BID in these efforts along with the City (as of May 2025, lhe Washing Avenue Bid has since been engaged); and WHEREAS, FERC members made a favorable recommendation to move the item to the October 30, 2024 City Commission meeting for approval to proceed with the installation of wrap- around lights on median trees on Washington Avenue, from 5th Streel to 17th Street, in the approximate amount of$273,000; and WHEREAS, FERC members also requested the Administration to come back to the November 8, 2024, FERC meeting to provide cost estimates for sidewalk repairs/replacement and cost for the replacement of lighting fiztures along Washington Avenue�, and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2024, FERC members discussed the total cost for in-kind replacement of grey sidewalk and pertnanent light fxtures estimated at$1,537,000, to be funded through the GO Bond; and WHEREAS, Committee members expressed a desire to upgrade the sidewalk materials from what was originally presented, since there was enough money funded under the GO Bond; and WHEREAS, the Committee directed staff to come back to the January 24, 2025, FERC meeting, with an updated cost and plan for upgraded sidewalk malerials; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2025 FERC members were presented wifh an Exposed Shell Specialty concrete option to be considered; and WHEREAS, the discussion continued and concluded with a motion to return to the March 26, 2025, FERC meeting with an addilional 3-4 recommendations for specialty sidewalks; and WHEREAS, the cost to replace the Pedestrian Light Fixtures remains at an estimated: $650,000(LED, 4KAcom light f�Rures); and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2025 FERC members had a short discussion regarding the different sidewalk material options that had been provided to date by the Administration, including the brick paver option presented at a public meeting for Ocean Drive, for lighting and sidewalk improvements; and WHEREAS, discussions continued with the recommendation to have the Administration meet with the Washington Avenue BID to have them select three (3) brick paver design options that would be presented to Commission members, with Commission members selecting the fnal option; and WHEREAS, the Administretion also suggested asking the Washington Avenue BID lo provide their feedback on otherenhancements theywould like to see on Washington Avenue; and WHEREAS, a motion was made by FERC members to move the item to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation, directing the Administration to proceed with sidewalk improvements on Washington Avenue from Lincoln Road to 15h Street, east and west sidewalks, using brick pavers, lo be funded underthe GO Bond funds, and incorporate input from the Washington Avenue BID; and WHEREAS, using the design created by Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. that incorporates pavers, a construction estimate has been developed in the amount of$1.05 Million. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CI7YOF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA,that the Mayorand City Commission hereby, accept the favorable recommendation of the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee, at its March 26, 2025 meeting, directing the Administration ro proceed with sidewalk improvements on Washington Avenue from Lincoln Road to 15th Street, east and west sidewalks, using brick pavers, in the estimated amount of$1.05 Million, funded under the General Obligation (GO) Bond Fund. PASSED and ADOPTED THIS �Sday of J��� 2025. ATTEST: � JUN 3 0 7.�25 Steven Meiner, Mayor � G��� . � Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk %p?f`���8��.�'�",, Y�� REGIS BARBOU `rj�,? � APPROVED AS TO s�'�^- `_ ; t ��.INiOAa ORAtE�' : FORM & LANGUAGE ;,.�. 1,�` R F�N „9RCH.,Z�;���J_- r)i 31�025 Sponsored by Commissioner Kristen Rosen Gonzalei City nttorney � Date Co-Sponsored by Commissioner Joseph Magazine Resolutions -C7 Z MIAMI BEACH COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Honoreble Mayor and Members o(lhe City Commission FROM: Eric Carpenler, City Manager DATE: June 25, 2025 TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CIN COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCY COMMITTEE, AT ITS MARCH 26, 2025 MEETING, DIRECTING THE ADMINISTRATION TO PROCEED WITH SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ON WASHINGTON AVENUE FROM LINCOLN ROAD TO 15TH STREET, EAST AND WEST SIDEWALKS, USING BRICK PAVERS, IN THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $1.05 MILLION, FUNDED UNDER THE GENERAL OBLIGATION ("GO") BOND FUNDS, AND INCORPORATE INPUT FROM THE WASHINGTON AVENUE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION The Administretion recommends accepting lhe tavorable recommendation of the Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee ("FERC"), at its March 26, 2025 meeting, directing the Administralion to pmceed wilh sidewalk improvements on Washington Avenue from Lincoln Road to 15th Street, east and west sidewalks, using bnck pavers, in Ihe estimated amount of $1.05 Million, (unded under the General Obligalion (GO) Bond funds and incorporate input from the Washington Avenue Business Improvement District (BID). BACKGROLINDIHISTORY On June 26, 2024, at the request of Commissioner Kristen Rosen-Gonzalez, co-sponsored by Commissioners Joseph Magazine, David Suarez, Alex Femandez, and Tanya Bhatt, the Mayor and City Commission ("City Commission") approved refeval item C4C, to lhe Finance and Economic Resiliency Committee ("FERC') meeting, to tliscuss beautifying Washington Avenue by enhancing lighting and streetsraping. There had been similar requests brouqht up for diswssion by City Commission members al the Public Safety and Quality of Life Committee("PSNQLC")and FERC meetings to enhance lighting on South Beach, however, neither request turned into (avorable recommendations to the City Commission for approval, due to costs for installation and maintenance exceeding $i Million. On Sep[ember 20, 2024, FERC members were provided sidewalk and lighting updates along Washington Avenue. Public Works presenled hvo proposals for wrap-around lights on median trees for the east and west sidewalks, including maintenance costs tor a period of one year aRer installatioa The breakdown for these costs were: • Washington Avenue from 5th Street to 17th Streel(median trees): $272,532 • Washington Avenue from Sth Street to 17th Street(east and west sidewalks): $1,195,950 Public Works reiterated at Committee that funding for the proposed wrap-around lights had yet to be identified. There was also a discussion about the $10 Million GO Bond fund as part of the Washinglon Avenue Cortidor Project. Said funding, would be used to invest in capi[al improvements, permanent liqhting and landscaping along Washington Avenue. However, since wrap-around lights are considered temporary fixtures, they would not be eligible for GO Bond 899 funding. Discussians at Committee continued, and focused on how to reenergize Washington Avenue in the short and long terms, using GO Bond funds. There were discussions regarding the need to have the Washington Avenue BID be involved in ihese eHorts along with the City, subsequenlly, ihe Washington Avenue BID has been engaged on the topic. FERC members made a favorable recommendation to move Ihe item lo the October 30, 2024,Ciry Commission meeting for approval to proceed with the installation of wrapamund lights on median trees on Washington Avenue, /rom Sth Street to 171h Street, in the appmximate amount of $273,000. FERC members also requested tor the Administretion to come back to ihe November Q 2024, FERC meeting to provide wst estimates for sidewalk repairs/replacement and cost for the replacement of lighting fxtures along Washington Avenue. On November 8, 2024, FERC members discussed lhe lotal wst for in-kind replacement of grey sidewalk and permanent light fz[ures estimated at $1,537,000, to be fundetl ihrough the GO Bond. Committee members expressed a desire to upgrade the sidewalk matenals from what was originally presented, since there was enough money allocated within the GO Bond project. Direction was given for staH to wme back to the January 24, 2025, FERC meeting, with an updated cost and plan for upgraded sidewalk materials. On January 24, 2025. FERC members were presented with an exposed shell specialty concrete option to be considered.The discussion continued and concluded with a motion to retum to ihe March 26, 2025, FERC meeting wilh an additional 3-4 recommendations for specialty sidewalks. ANALYSIS Sidewalks The Adminis[ration oblained three(3)additional estimates from several contractors for alternalive sidewalk improvements along Washington Avenue between Sth and 17th streets to include Americans with Disability Act ("ADA") wmpliance and other factors not previously included. The following were five(5)options presented,not induding yeady maintenance fees estimated at 5%: 1) Red conciete sidewalk($1,418,381.68) 2) Exposed shell specialry wncrete sidewalk($2,217,430) 3)Stamped specialty sidewalks ($1,893,612) 4) Paver bncks ($9,418,541) 5) Red and grey concrele sidewalk ($2,506,410) REGULAR RED CONCRETE SIUEWALK Pros: . AHordable: generally, the most cost-effective option • Smooth Surtace: even and unifortn, making it accessible for all users (e.g., wheelchairs, strollers) . Low Maintenance: easy to clean and does not require much upkeep beyond sealing (if necessary) Cons: . Prone to Crackinq: susceptible to cracks over time due to ground movement or weathering . Appearance: Color may fade over time, difference in color belween existing red concrete and new red concrete when repairs are made EXPOSED SHELL CONCRETE SIDEWALK Pros: . Aesthetic AppeaC features embedded shells for a natural,decorative,and coastal-inspired look . Durabiliry� the embedded shells can increase surface hardness and resilience 900 • Slip Resistance: textured surface provides good trection, especially in wet conditions . Unique Appearance: no two installations are identical due to the vanation in shell pattems . Eco-Friendly: oken uses reclaimed or recycled shells,which is environmentalty friendly Cons: . Higher Cost: typirally, more expensive due to matenals and specialized labor . Rough Texture: less comfortable for 6are feet compared to smooth suRaces • Maintenance: dirt and debris can accumula[e in textured areas, requinng regular cleaning . Repair Challenges: matching the shell pariern dunng repairs can be difficult, making patches visible • Prone to Cracking:susceplible to cracks over time due to ground movement orweathering . Appearance: color may fade over time STAMPED CONCRETE SIDEWALK Pros: • Customizable Designs: can mimic Ihe appearance of stone, bnck, tile, or wood, offenng a high-end look • Wide Range of Colors: can be stained or dyetl to achieve nearly any color scheme . Durability: seamless construction provides greater resistance to shifting and settling than loose pavers . Increased Property Value: enhances curb appeal and can make lhe property more attractive Cons: . Cost: more expensive than regular concrele, though usually less than exposed shell concrele . Maintenance: requires regulai resealing to maintain its appearance and prevent damage . Risk of Cracking: like regular concrete, stamped concrete is prone to cracking; cracks are harder to repair without visible seams • Skilled Labor Needed: installation requires expenenced contractors to achieve ihe desired pattern and fnish . Appearance: color may fade over time PAVER BRICKS Pros: . Durability: made from high-quality materials like concrete,which are designed ro withs[and harsh wea[her conditions • Slip Resislance�. many ot lheir pavers have a tezlured suAace, providing better trection and reducing lhe risk of slipping, especially in wet conditions . Eco-Friendly: some paver bncks feature pertneable designs, which allow water to pass through, reducing stormwater runoff and helping with drainage Cons: . Higher CosC can be more expensive compared to other paver styles . Installation Complexity: paver bncks are relatively heavy which can make instailation more labor-intensive antl require additional tools or help . Risk of Cracking: although dura6le, concrete pavers can crack under extreme pressure or impact, especially if they are not maintained propedy . High Maintenance: proper installalion is critical to ensure longevity. Poor installation can lead to shifting or settling over time,which will require repairs . Appearance: diffcWt to f nd similar replacement pavers for repairs after a few years RED &GREY CONCRETE SIDEWALK Pros: . Visual Appeal: a red and grey pattemed sidewalk adtls a bold, stylish touch to outdoor spaces. it can enhance the wrb appeal and make the sidewalk a focal point. 907 . Increased Aesthetic Value: ihe conlrast between the red and grey can create depth and texture, giving the sidewalk an upscale, professional appearance that can elevate the overall design of the area. . Durability: both red and grey concrete are durable and provide long-lasting solutions, ensuring lhat the patterned sidewalk will withsland heary fool lreKc and the elements. Cons: • Cost and Labor: patterned concrete oken requires more complex work, which can increase both matenal and labor costs. More detailed pattems might also take longer to install . Complex Maintenance: i( the conaete start to stain, creck, or fade, the difficult pattern could make repairs more challenging and expensive . Cleaning Difficulties: depending on the pattem's complexity, cleaning between Ihe diHerent sections or grooves in the design could be more time-consuming and challenging compared to a simple uniform sidewalk . Prone to Cracking:susceptible to cracks over time due to ground movement orwea�henng Feature Ragular Retl Exposed S�ell Stampetl Paver Brieks Red 8 Gray Concrete Gonereta Gonmta Concrete oa� Low Medium-High eEium VeryHigh Medium-High esthetic Appeal Basic Unique,Coastal Highty Unique Maderatei ook ustomizaDle Sry sh Dumblliry High Hlgh Hig� Made2�e Motlerd�e Moderale- High IipResisfance Hig� High Moderate-High Nig� Mainlonano Low Mode2te oGerate VeryHigh Low-MeEium RepairDi/flculry Easy DiRicult oderete DiRcult MOEe2te REGULAR RED CONCRETE SIDEWALK ,��11 � * d '�� ,� \\\\ `k � � .` �l � , > j ?, � � T� y� �' rc .��`� �: r��� � i , y �::+sz EXPOSED SHELL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 902 ���. :.�+i � �. �.'. � �� y� /��lT i..' � : /' F �� ��� }">j'<E� .C%'V�� i.3 :..,'� 'l� R' � .i r S•l.� r �v' i..r' /'�` � �.. � < <'",� �� ""{i � �r��: ( r �iL•. ��Q < � � r• � . . - �� r d�;: / �L�I" ' � i ` �f }{f •s �/ JS, r s z 4 ���,� r �;s �� �� �t s' !'.r � jp �iQi�. '�- •:. � ..� .i'� �-i . �✓1; :� ;• �l � ��_ ) � '/' '' �+� '�� STAMPED CONCRETE SIDEWALK � _ � �t I� �{ ,� �, ..z.,r {� _=s ,� �" � . .�'�(/"��� �� . . . ..%..;�pl• � � �• a. PAVER BRICKS � � � � f� � � . � . �� .: . .`' « '\ _ _'.� � . ` '_' _ a � � } � � MIX RED & GREY 903 ' ; �� i J,� __ . �. ... -=�s :� Additionally, a study was conducted by Calvin, Giordano and Associates, showing the differenl sidewalk options for Ocean Drive for design consitleration (Attachment B). Liahtino The cost to replace the Pedestnan Light Fixtures remains at an estimaled: $650,000 (LED, 4K Awrn light fztures). UPDATE On March 26, 2025 FERC members had a short discussion regarding ihe different sidewalk material options that had been pmvided ro date by the Administration, includinq the brick paver option presen[ed at a public meeting for Ocean Dnve, for lighting antl sidewalk improvements. Discussions continued wi[h the recommendation to have the Administration meet with the Washington Avenue BID to have them seled three (3) biick paver design options that would be presented to Commission members. Once al Commission, Commission members could select a fnal option. The Administration also suggested to have the Washington Avenue BID provide their feedback on other enhancements they would like to see on Washington Avenue. A motion was made by FERC members to move the item to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation, directing the Administration to proceed with sidewalk improvements on Washington Avenue from Lincoln RoaG to 15h Street, east and west sidewalks, using brick pavers, to be funded under ihe GO Bond funds, and incorporate input from the Washington Avenue BID. Using the design created by Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. that inwrporates pavers, a consWction estimate has been developed in the amount of$1 A5 Million. FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT The estimated cost for sidewalk improvements on Washington Avenue,from Lincoln Road to i 5th Street, east and west sidewalks is: $1.05 Million funded under the GO Bond Funds appropriated for Washington Avenue Improvements. CONCLUSION The Administration recommends accepting the favorable recommendalion of the Finance and Ewnomic Resiliency Committee ("FERC"), at its March 26, 2025 meeting, direcling the Administration[o proceed with sidewalk improvements on Washington Avenue from Lincoln Road to 15th Street,east and west sitlewalks, using brick pavers,funded under the GO Bond funds and incorporate input from the Washington Avenue BID. Aooliwble Area South Beach 904 Is this a "Residents Ri51ht to Know" item. Is this item related to a G.O. Bond oursuant to CiN Code Section 2-17? Proiect7 Ves No Deoartment Public Works SDonsor(sl Commissioner Knsten Rosen Gonzalez Co-soonsorlsl Commissioner Joseph Magazine Condensed Title Accept Redlmplement Sidewalk Improv, Washington Av from Linc to 15 Sl. (KRG/JM) PW Previous Action (For CiN Clerk Use Onlvl Deferred on 5/21/2025- C7 O 905