Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Architectural and Engineering Services Agreement between Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. and CMB ( j
. . . '. � . , t��� `�_� �
CXyW Mlami Beach, 1100 Convention Center Drive,Miomi Beach,Flonda 33139,www.miomibeachfl.gov
OFFICE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT$
ie1:305.6]3J071 Fox:305.6]3J073
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: Eric Carpenter, P.E.
City Manager
VIA: David Martinez, P.E.
Assistant City Manager
FROM: David Gomez
CIP Director
DATE: July 15, 2025
SUBJECT: Amendment No.1 to the Calvin, Giordano &Associates, Inc Agreement for
the Ocean Drive Corridor Improvement and Lummus Park Enhancement Project
We are submitting: Priority: Submitted for: Action Taken:
❑ Permit Application ❑ RUSH ❑ Review ❑ Reviewed
❑ Final Acceptance Letter � High Prioriry 0 Approval/Signature ❑ Approved
❑ Letter to Commission ❑ Low Prioriry ❑ Comment ❑ ReWrned for
❑ Agenda Items ❑ For your use Corrections
� Other ❑ As requested
❑ ReWrned due to revisions
Once ready, please contact Raquel Plasencia, Ext. 26424
Notes: On May 21, 2025, lhe City Commission adopted Resolution 202533690,
authorizing Amendment No.1 to the Professional Services Agreement belween the
City of Miami Beach, Florida and Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc., for additional
services, in the not to-exceed amount of$540,907.54, related to additional modeling
and traffic studies as a result of requirements from FDOT and MDTPW, as well as
additional design services to implement Commission direction regarding advancing
design and construction of the west sidewalk of Ocean Drive.
Enclosures:
Form Approved Amendment No.1 (CGA)
Resolution 202533690
�
We are commibetl fo provltling excellenf publlc servlce ontl sOfefy Yo all who live,work,ond play in ourvibronf,fropical,
hisiori[communiry.
2a 25 -33�q �
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL
AND ENGINEERING (AIE) SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
AND
CALVIN, GIORDANO &ASSOCIATES, INC.
DATED JUNE 6, 2023
FORTHE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENT AND LUMMUS PARK ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, IN THE NOT-
TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $540,907.54 ��
_ i t 1, 7i�i`�
This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendmenf') to that certain Agreement for
Architectural Design Services for the Ocean Drive Corridor Improvement and Lummus
Park Enhancement Project, dated as of June 6, 2023 (the "Agreement") is made and
entered this_day of , 2025, by and belween the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida (the "City"), having
its principal offces at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, and
CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation having its principal
offce at 1800 Eller Drive, Suite 600, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 ("ConsWtanP').
Capitalized terms used but not defned in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Agreement.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2022, the Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution
No. 2022-32340 authorizing negotiations with Consultanl, as the top ranked proposer, under
Request for Qualifications No. 2022-430-ND;
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2023, the City and Consultant executed the Agreement, in the
total amount of $2,720,049J0, wherein Consultant agrees to provide architectural and
engineering design services to the City for the Ocean Drive Corridor Improvement and Lummus
Park Enhancement Project(the "Long-Term Improvements");
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2023, CGA was issued a Notice to Proceed and commenced
meeting with the regulalory agencies and prior to commencing the data collection, traffic analysis
and modeling, it was necessary for CGA and the City to obtain concurrence from the regulatory
agencies;
WHEREAS, mandatory traffic study methodology was subsequently oblained from lhe
Miami-Dade County Department of Transportalion and Public Works ("DTPW") and the Florida
Department of Transportation ("FDOT");
WHEREAS, Consultant will need to conduct additional work (the "Additional Work") to
meet the requirements of the DTPW and FDOT approved traffic sludy methodology in connection
with lhe Long-Term Improvements, including the collection of traffc data at additional
intersections, the evalua(ion of additional multiple traffic scenarios, and the preparation of"
additional traffic models;
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2024, Ihe Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution
No. 202433337, directing the City Administration to take the necessary next steps to implement
lighting and sidewalk improvements along the Ocean Drive Corridor (the "Short-Term
Improvements");
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, Consultant submitted a request for Additional Services,
for a total amount not to exceed $540,907.54, for the scope of work necessary to complete the
Additional Work, in the amount o( $254,485.30, and the design services for the Short-Term
Improvements, in the amount of$286,42224;
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2025, the Mayor and City Commission adopfed Resolution No.
2025-33690 authorizing the City to increase the scope of the Agreement to include the Additional
Work and the design services for the Short-Term Improvements, for a total amount not to exceed
$540,907.54; and
WHEREAS, this Amendment will increase the total contract value from $2,720,049.70 to
$3,260,95724.
NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and condilions contained
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the City and Consultant hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
7. ABOVE RECITALS. The above recitals are true and correct and are
incorporated as a part of this Amendment.
2. MODIFICATIONS. The Agreement is hereby amended (deleted items siraek
kxeugp and inserted items underlined) as follows:
(a) Section 7.1 of the Agreement is modified as follows:
7.1. Consultant's "Lump Sum" fee for the provision of the Services, excluding
reimbursable allowances, for the Project shall be$2,598,52352$3.088.681.06, as more
fully delineated in Schedule B hereto. The City has a set reimbursable allowance in an
amount not to exceed $42&52�M1� $172 276.18, for a total Contract Value of
$2,729-;948,�8 $3 260.95724 (base bid of $2,599,52352 $3 088 681.06 plus
reimbursable of $728526-3� $172 276.18). Contractor shall be compensated
incrementally upon the completion of each of^�-�^�,,.,� ',',�aa-o' phases 1 2 3 and 4 of
the project as described in Schedule B (the "Phase(s)"). Furthermore, Consultant shall
complete each Phase before the Ciry will issue a Consultant Service Order for any
subsequentPhase(s).
(b) ConsultanYs proposal dated March 25, 2025,attached hereto as Schedule
A-3 (Additional Scope of Services), together with all exhibits lhereto, is hereby
incorporated into and made part of the Agreement. Schedule A-3 supplements, and shall
be deemed a part of, the existing Schedule A (Scope of Services). All references to
Schedule A in the Agreement shall be deemed to refer to Schedule A, as further
supplemented by Schedule A-3.
(c) Schedule B (Consultant Compensation Schedule) to the Agreement is
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Revised Schedule B (Revised
ConsWtant Compensation Schedule).
(d) Schedule E (Project Schedule) to the Agreement is deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the attached Revised Schedule E (Revised Long-Term Improvements
Project Schedule).
(e) Schedule E-1 (Short-Term Improvements Project Schedule) is hereby
incorporated into and made part of the Agreement. Schedule E-1 supplements, and shall
be deemed a part of,the Revised Schedule E(Revised Long-Term Improvements Project
Schedule). All references to Schedule E in the Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the
Revised Schedule E, as supplemented by Schedule E-1.
(f) In consideration of lhe Additional Services lo be performed pursuant to
Schedule A-3, the City shall pay Consultant an additional, not-to-exceed, amount of
$540,907.54. The total compensation under the Agreement, including this Amendment,
shall not exceed $3,260,95724, unless further amended in writing by the City and
ConsWlant.
3. RATIFICATION. Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. In the event there is a
conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this
Amendment shall govern.
(THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment lo be executed in
their names by their duly authorized officials as of the date frst set forth above.
ATTEST: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
.��:. 2 �� ,� �) �/ "—
r� � ,,
Rafael E. Granado, City Clerk Eric T. Carpente , P.E., City Manager
�i.e:��y,
:�:,i�
:.�+``, `1
; 'IN(ORP OAAif0. i
ATTEST: `*,3`� �1� ,�9y� CALVIN, GIORDANO&ASSOCIATES, INC.
''4QcH.Zfi`y,
,,,���,.,,,...- L/ / /~"�` �
}
��� '� - ���' — � c
Secretary Vice President
Dawn Hopkins David Stambaugh
Print Name Print Name
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
�a����
�ry City AttomeyL'� Date
SCHEDULE A-3
ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
(attached)
� :"��85 �'': Calvin, Giordano b Associates, Inc.
� � �,, vEA� ��; ., ;., : , �
<�q ��� � C4MPo�Nr
:� '
March 25,2025
Building Code Services
CivilEnginaeiinyi Roatlway Mf. DaVld Gomez
BHighwayDesiyn Interim-Director,CapitallmprovementProjec[s
Goes�alEnglneering [ityofMiamiBeach
CotleEnlo�cement 1700Conven[ionCenterDrive
Constmc�ionEngineering8 MiamiBeach, Florida33139
Inspection(CEp
Constmetlon Services
OataTechnologies& RE Notification of Delay Resulting from Changes in Traffic Engineering Smpe of Work for
oevelopmenl Ocean �rive and Wmmus Park and Request for Additional Funds to Complete Agency-Required
Eler.trical Enqineeiinq Traffic Shdies and to satisfy[he directive received via the City Commission's Resolution.
Engineerinp
Envhanmental Suvices
FacilOiesManapemenl D2df Mf. Gomez:
Grant Management 8
Wnting At the request of City Staff,we are providing a revision[o thfs document,originally issued to[he
Geograpniclnlormation City on July 24, 2024, to indude scope and fees for additional services requested by Ciry
Sys�ems(GIS) Commission via a Resolution. For darity of the document, we have separated the [wo
Govemmental5ervices �omponents of this document as follows:
Indoui Ai�ouality pAa) I. Specific to[he Long-term Improvements to Ocean Drive and Lummus Vark: Scope edits
Landscape ArchilecNre to address the traffic study requirements of the Florida Department of Transportation
Planning (FDOT) and the Miami-Dade Counry Depar[ment of Transportation and Public Works
PmieclManayement (DTPW)
Retlevelopmont& a. ExhibitA: feebreakdownforthetraffcstudycomponent($ 254,48530)
uman oesign b. Revised Exhibit E: updated schedule from what was originally induded in the
SurveyinnBMapping originalrontractroaddressthetrafficstudyrequirementsofFDOTandDTPW.
Transpona�ionBMobiliry II. Spe<ifictothe5hort-termlmprovementstoOceanDrive: Additional5ervicesrequested
Transporta�ion Planning for the design, permitting and implementation of lighting and sidewalk improvements
wa�er/miii�iesEnglneedng alongOreanDrive.
wPb:ne oe�eioPme��
a. E�hi6it F. fee breakdown forthe short-term additional services($286,422.24)
b. EMhibit G:anticipated schedule for the short-term additional services
I. SPECIFIC TO THE LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN DHIVE AND LUMMUS PARK:
180o Eiiei orivu yi/e are hereby notifying the City of a delay to the projea schedule, and we are submitting this
Suite 600
PotlLauderdale,FL33316 explanation of a change in smpe of work for your review and attion for architectural and
TeP. 954921.7iet engineering services for[he Ocean Drive and Lummus Park project The modified scope of work,
Fv: 95a.921.880' as of today's date, remlts in a total fee increase of$254,48530. Please note that this scope of
work reFlects requirements induded in final approved methodologies formally approved 6y[he
Agencies Having lurisdiction (AHJ�: the Florida Department of Transportation �FDOT) and the
www.cgasolNions.com Miami-0ade County Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW). It is important to
cpqiL6��CEFPCIf MiAhll-0ADF WESiFAV4etAC° �:EnPVlAiEP"A�em4 2FiF,PO POPiS1Cd
RSF Ol-II-6362—MarzM1]5,3035
Page 1 of 15
note that delays[o Ihis 'Part 1' of the mntract may impact future mmpanents of Ihe mn[ract,
as those could be dependent on the sucressful mmpletion of'Part 1'.
ORIGINALCONTRACTBACKGROUND
A[ the time of develaping the smpe of wark far the project and during our initial scoping
meetings in December 2022 and January 2023,CGA advised the Ci[y[ha[a swping meeting with
both Miami-Dade County's Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) and [he
Florida Department of Trensportation (FDOT� would 6e essential to ascertain what processes,
procedures, and standards they would apply m the required traffic evaluation methodology
necessary to secure a permit with 6oth agencies. That advizemenf was made in order ta derive
exactly wha[scope of work would be essential to meet Ihe requirements of[he agencies. The
City directed CGAta not mnduct a preliminary meeting with Ihe agencies and instead develop a
smpe of wark, based on assumptions CGA would make, with the directive that, once the
coordination process commenced with[he agencies, if changes in the smpe were needed [hen
they would be addressed at that time and any neressary changes to the contract would be
presented to Commission for approval.
Pollowing receipt of the Notice to Praceed Ol �NTP-Ol�, CGA drafted a methodology for iraffic
study and evaluation, based on the assumptions that were made at the time of developing the
srope of work. The initial coordina[ion meeting with[he agencies ocmrred in August 2023,and
the team has met wfth both DTP W and FDOT Staff on several occasions to review their comments
to the various iterations af the methodology, to gather feedback and further comment, and co
seek mnsensus be[ween the two agencies.
Approvals were received as follows:
• May 17, 2024—Approval on methodology received from FWT
• May 24, 2024—PDOLapproved methodolagy suhmitted to �TPW Por concurrency
• lune 26,2024—Appraval on methodology re<eived from DTPW
The current, approved methodology for study, resWting from the directives abtained from Ihe
agencies during Ihe mordination meetings, has substantially changed from the initial
assumptions tha[were made at the time of drafting the original scope of work.
IMPACTS TO'PART 1—TRAFFIC STUDIES'
In summary, [hose modifications ta the Traffic Engineering methodology which impact the smpe of work
indude:
• An increase af 96-hour Average DailyTraffic(ADTs)data mllection and evalua[ion
• An increase of6-hourTurning Movement Counts(TMCs)data rollection and evaluation at intersections
during the weekdays and weekends
• The addition of segment speed collections
• The addition of scenarios ta 6e evaluated when determining[he 'existing conditions' baseline, where
DTPW and FDOT differ in Iheir legal positioning on what is to be defermined as 'existing mnditions'
• The addition of a scenario analysis that solely evaluates the modification of traffic pattems on all east-
west streets leading from Collins Avenue to Ocean Drive into one-way couplets to isolate the impact of
one-waying these street segments,which are required for Optiore 2 and 3 in the ADCD Plan.
PSF OS-33-6362—March 35,3035
Vage 3 0�15
• A directed shift in the methodology basis from "travel forecastfng models" to a hy6rid model wlth [he
patential for including"�ynamic Traffic Assignment(DTA)models,"as specifically requested by FDOT.
o Travelforecastingmodelsrepresent[hestaticregional[ravelanalysiscapability,whereasDTA's
microscopic traffic simulation models are superior for regional dynamic mrridor-level [ravel
analysis. DTA models fill in the gap by ena6ling dynamic trafflc to be modeled at a range of
scales Ihat highlights impacts[o the regional area.
o The change fo DTA model-based analyses came as a resWt ofthe mnfluence of several projects
and initiatives which will impact the study area within which Orean Drive si[s, which the
agencies require to 6e factored-in and reflected in[he study, induding the following list:
• The current'temporary' permitted ronditians af Ocean Drive
• The current unpermitted mnditions of the Ocean�rive"Promenade"
• The pending permit request by the CiTy to the County for the<losure of Espanola Way
6etween Washingcan Avenue and Collins Avenue.
• The submission to the County far an evaluation on a proposal to pedestrianize the
segment of Lincoln Raad east of Washington Avenue.
• County plans for a forthcoming Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) infras[ructure improvement on
W ashington Avenue
(Please no[e that the agencies'mncems lie at Ihe mnfluence of how the sum of these projec[s
will impact traffit pattems and diversion thraughout the mntezt when compounded hy the
suggested changes to Ocean Drive,<ontemplated in the 3 different scenarios being evaluared.
It is important to note that if the City makes any additional requests for new permits for any
additional road closures or treffic modifications during our study-period and which are not
already contemplated in this study's methodology,the agencies may reject the results af any
findings and may require that any additional requested projects be added to the overall
evaluation at the time ot considering the issuance of any permits, requiring the study to he
amended accordingly.)
POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM FUTURE ANCILLARV PROlERS
• Due to an "unpermitted"status of[he Ocean �rive"Promenade," DTPW has diverted from FDOT in[he
determination of what is to be considered "ezisting mnditions." Despite the fact [hat the mrrent
mnfiguration of [he overall mnfiguration af Ocean Drive (one-way southbound with dedicated bike
lanes) received a petmit and which has 6een in-place following COVID,DTPW has taken the stance that
the "existing mnditions"to be used when modeling the baseline for the project shall be the ronditions
that ezisted pre-COVID. DTPW has directed us to utilize pre-COVID mnditions and project them to
current date.
• An increase in the evaluation time and effort ta perform [he required OTA analyses. This necessitates
a heightened level of analysis, increased processing time, more romprehensive descriptions,extensive
documentation,additional exhibits, and a substantial organixational effort. On average,the num6er of
hours allocated per professional has substantially increased, primarily due to the escalated mmplezity
of[he project,the increased diligence required for dommenting and evaluating[he data,and the more
extensive processes required for the analysis. Additionally,the required rechnical, specialty expertise
of the staff required to mnduct the directed analyses has been increased acmrdingly.
• It is important to note Ihat this increase in smpe also has impacls on the degrees and levels of
mordination needed among the assigned team mem6ea and the agencies,and as such also increased
[he project management needs to ensure quality, mnsistenry, and compliance with the agencies'
requirements,including several wordination meetings wfth[he agencies.
nsa oi-zaszcx-marm xs,zozs
Pdge 4 0(15
WORK PERFORMED TO-DATE
W e mntinue to advante the project as much as we can, making every attempt to minimize[he impacts[hat the
changes in the new methodology will have on the contracted schedule.
• DataCollectian: Besidesthemanymordinatianandworking-sessionmeetingswehavehadwithDTPW
and FDOT, we have mmpleted the mllection of traffic data that both DTPW and FDOT agreed upon
induding vehiwlar, pedestrian and cy<list data. That data was col lected at the following bcations:
• Washington Avenue, between 91h and 10`"Street
• Collins Avenue, between 9'"and l0th Street
• Ocean Drive,hetween 9[h and IOth Stree[
• Washington Avenue, between 141h Street and Espanola Way
• Collins Avenue, between 14`"Street and 14th Place
• Ocean Drive, hetween 141h Street and 14th Place
• Inter-Departmental S[akehalder Meetings: The CGA design team has met with every mn[ri6uting City
department stakeholders to introduce them to the project, dismss the parameters of the swpe, and
salicit data related to the design af Orean Drive and Lummus Park. This initial interdepartment
coardination will mntinue and be keyto ensuring a successful project. The departments with whom we
met,with the oversight of CIP, indude:
• Culture and Tourism
• Economic Development
• Environmen[and5ustainabiiity
• Facilities
• Fire
• Green Space
• Parking
• ParksandRecreation
• Planning
• Polire
• Public Works
• Ur6an Forestry
• Large-event Logistics Observation: In response to the importanre Wmmus Park plays in large event
planning and its impact as an emnomic generator for Ihe City, CIP and CGA Staff inet with various
depar[ments during the seFup ofthe Air and Sea Show and the Food and Wine Festival,where CIP and
CGA Staff were able to ohserve and understand the various logistics and needs of preparing for and
planningforeventsofthatscale. Thisisimportantduetothefactthatoneoftheperformativemetrics
for a well-design W mmus Park indudes the flexi6ility needed for large-scale engagements.
• Topographical Survey: We have finalized [he topographic survey of[he proje<t site and are currently
coordinating and scheduling Community stakeholder meetings to commen<e [he public engagement
mmponent of [he project with 'listening sessions' that will serve as a basis for fu[ure design and
outreach effarts.
PSA O]-33-62Q—March 35,3035
Page 5 ot 15
SUMMARV OF ANTICIPATED IMPARS
1. �ue to the modificatian of the methodology,as direc[ed by DTPW and F�OT,the project schedule will
be delayed. The original milestone was to make a presentation of findings and recammendations to
City Cammission in April of 202A far zelection of a roadway configuration tor O<ean Drive. That was
based on a schedule that had a methodology approved by early September 2023. The current delay
has pushed that milestone 6y a scale ot months to possibly early Fall 2025.
II. SPECIFICTOTMESHORT-TERMIMPROVEMENTSTOOCEANDRIVE:
The City has requesied that this scope be revised to add ligh[ing and sidewalk improvements m enhance safety,
acressibility, and aes[hetia along Ocean Drive, "which can be completed in a shorter timeframe;"compared
to the Orean Drive and Lummus Park Enhancement Project which "is a multi-year endeavor that involved
comprehensive design, permitting and constructionl" The goal for the praject is to "implement the lighting
and sidewalk improvements as part of the wter-approved G.O. Bond Ocean Drive Corridor Improvement
Projec[" '
'Item O AI, City of Miomi Beach Commission Agenda, dated October 3Q 2024
Our understanding of the request is to prepare design options and implementa[ion strategies Por im provements
that can be implemented in [he short [erm. The request from the City is that shorFterm improvements he
designed in a manner so they can be transitioned into the long-term plans for Ocean Drive and Lummus Park.
Generally,[he most effective manner m achieve[his is to first arrive at a long-term design and de[ermine where
all the critical infrastructure needs [o be located, then reverse engineer a short-term implementation
component, partiwlarly 6ecause the changes heing suggested in Ihe AOCD Plan are a large depaRure from the
existing mndi[ions impacting roadway configurations, sidewalk widths,the location of drainage infrastructure,
lighting infrastructure, parking, landscaping and irrigatian. Modifying the enisting conditions for a short-term
improvement that will [hen be retro-fitted to a future mnfiguration will not Iranslate 100%from the short-to
long-term phase;there will he romponents that will work for the short-term phase and will require to be undone
or remnfigured for the future phase, depending on the degree of changes 6eing proposed. We remgnize[hat
thismayhaveafinancialimpactonthetransitlonbetweenphases. Wewillmakeeveryefforttominimizethese
condi[ions and take this short- to long-term phasing strategy into ronsideration when evaluating and making
design recommendations.
To achieve[his,this proposal acknowledges thai reducing impacts to infrastructure that can either halloon the
budge[ or exacerbate the schedule will be an essential companent to the project's success and will go a long
way to ensure that[he project is implementable. Additionally,design decisions should reflect known limi[ations
Ihat permit agencies will impose. These limitations should include:
1. Ensuring that the existing drainage pattems of the roadway remain unchanged. This will eliminate
prolonged times associated with design and permitting and eliminate costly upgrades to the ezisting
drainage fnfras[ructure. This will result in [he existing catch hasins and curb-and-gutters to remain in
[heir current location without modification.
2. Ensuringthattheexistingroadwaytrefficconiiguretiondoesnotchangeiromthecurrentconditions,
including the wrrent pavement marking and striping. The mrrent permitted rondition is a 1-way
sauthbound travel lane wi[h separated 6i-directional 6ike lanes. This will eliminate the requirement for
extensive traffic forecasting studies that require lots of time far stenario-building and iraffic impact
modelling in order to secure a permii through M iami-Dade Counry's Depar[ment of Transporta[ion and
Public W orks. These studies and evaluations are currently heing undertaken as a part of the hase Ocean
Drive and Lummus Park Enhancement Project. Additionally, we want to avoid [riggering any reQuired
reviews hy Miami-Dade County's �epartment of Transportation and Public Works for modifications or
changes to[he pavement markings and signage.
ASF Ol-33-626d—Ma¢M1]5,30E5
Vage 6 of 35
3. Ensuring that all existing utilities remain unchanged. This will eliminate prolonged times assaciated
with performing utiliry coordina[ion efforts with utility companies and rostly effort to modify [he
location of ezisting utilities.
Ensuring that any lighting impravements lacated on the west side of Ocean Drive are casting illumination
away trom the shoreline,utilize turtle-friendly amber lighting,and are shielded to prevent light spill towards
the shoreline. This will eliminate known pain-poin[s with the Plorida Fish and Wildlife's restrictions on lighting
that may impact turtle nesting ha6itat areas. It is important to note that ANV lighting improvement will require
a permit from FWC through the State's CCCL Permit process,which at a minimum takes 6-8 mon[hs to o6tain a
permit Not designing im m�formanre with the restrictions put in place by FWC may have the impact of halting
[he project from pmceeding. I[ is cri[ical to understand Ihat per the requirements af FWC, the resul[ant
illumination levels will be of a lower intensity and may therefore need additional lighting flztures/strategies to
obtain higher levels of illumination, if so required bythe City.
Given the above paramerers, we recommend that the engineering and eventual implementation of the short-
term improvements be done in two parallel iracks:
• Track 1 should foms on sidewalk replacement, ezclusively. These improvements can he permitted
through the Ci[y's Public Works Department via a Righbof-Way permit and it allows [he Ciry to be in
control of the timeline to ezpedite reviews and obtaining Ihe permit. This scope is draked with the
understanding that a State-issued CCCL permit is required, however hecause the scope is only sidewalk
replacement we don't anticipate much more effort than an initial s[andard review by the agenry.
• Track2shouldfocusanlhelightingimprovements. TheseimprovemenlsaresubjecttaStatepermi[ting
processes and are on their own prolonged timeline. Separating[he implemen[ation of the lighting will
allow the sidewalk replacement to not 6e delayed bythe State's required appmval of the ligh[ing. This
track should only truly impact the selection of fixtures and lamps (6ulbs�—conduits, pull-hoxes, wiring
and other needed electrical infrastructure<an all he installed as a part of the sidewalk improvements in
Tra<k 1.
Specific Exdusions to[his'Short-term' Project:
• Modifications to any underground utility or service
• All roordination and permitting with any ulility or service agency that has infrastructure within the
Ocean Drive Right-of-Way
• Geotechnical Engineering Design Services
• Subsurface Utility Exploration �SUE) servi<es. This proposal is draked with the assumption [hat there
are no utility mnflic[s that will impact this"Short-term projecY'.
• �rainage Design
• Roadway Design and Traffic Engineering Design Servites
• Landscaping and irrigation Design Services
• All services during 6idding or mnshuction
Specific Task Elements to Include:
TASK 1—DATA COLLERION, EVALUATION,30%CONCEPTUAL PLAN,PUBLIC OUTREACH,and HPB APPROVAL
• Attend kick-off ineeting with City staff and intemal staff to confirm prqect goals and schedule.
• Review any available remrd drawings, utiliry atlases, the topographic and roadway survey, and the
findings fram any readily-availa6le u[iliry information fumished hy the City, coupled with on-site
observations to identify potential mnflicts to avoid in the short-term improvements.
PSA 01-13�6362-MarcM1 35,3@5
Page)oi 15
• Developpreliminarymnreptualplansfordesignapproachesandstrategiesforshort-termimprovement
options to be vetted by the City.
• Attend up to 6 design mordinatian meetings with various City Departments to identify impacts and
mnflicts with the proposed designs and ta solicit technical feed6ack and comments for modifications
m the design. The focus af these meetings will 6e to find solutions that do not trigger ezpensive
modificationsto eaisting infrastructure and increase their a6ilityto be implemented.
• Develop conceptual design approach.
• Once the concept is appraved 6y City Staff, CGA shall prepare a presentation and [he preparation of
necessary graphics to mnvey the improvements,for use in Ihe public outreach proress.
• Attend up to 6 meetings ta arrive at a selection for a preferred optian. These meetings are assumed to
be presentatian meetings to City Commission,Ciry Commission Committees,Sfakehalders,and Interest
Groups. The goal will be to solicit feedhack irom the puhliq stakeholden and elected officials on their
preferenres and mncems for each option.
o Notethatthesemeetingsarenotbeingsmpedaspu6liccharrettesorhalf-dayorall-daydesign
workshops.
• Once a directfon is approved from Commissioq CGA will proceed to advanre the mncepival design to
a Schematic(30%)Plans level.
o Prepare s<hematic plans showing the proposed improvements, based on and diswssions with
City Staff. Submit the schematic plans to staff for evaluation and feedhack. This plan will be a
30%level plan and will not include detailed engineering design yet.
o Refine Ihe design options and obtain sign-offs from Ihe various critical departments in the City,
confirming that Ihey have reviewed the designs and recommend Iheir potential consideration.
At a minimum,these should indude Traffic,Public Warks,Facilities,Planning,Sustainability,the
Police Department,the Fire Department,and UP.
• Update schematic plans 6ased on City Staff directives, following public mmmen[s, and su6mit to the
City staff for review.
• Onte revlewed hy City Staff, CGA will prepare all necessary design documen[s to advance for review by
che Historic Preservation Board�HPB).
• HistoricPreservationBoardApproval
o Preparation of appliwtion package forthe Historic Preservation Board.
o A[tendance fo up to 3 Historic Preservation Board meecings
• CGA shall not proceed to 60%plans/construction documents until the City has provided mnfirmation,
in writing, approving the mncep[ual design.
TASK 2—60%CONSTRURION PLANS PREPARATION
• Advance any desfgn considerations to indude requirements set in plare as a mndilion of approval by
the Hismric Preservation Board. Provided that any requirements imposed by HPB are within Ihe scope
of work of this project, those requiremen[s will be induded as part of this rontract. Where the
requirements extend beyond the smpe of work of this mntract, an Additional Services Agreement will
be required prior ta mmmencing those efforts.
• Prepare 60%mnstruction plans, induding:
o Coverand Generalnotes
o Demolitian Plans
o Sidewalk Site Plans
o SpecialtyPavingPlans
o Site Construction De[ails
o SWPP Plans
ASA01-3b6M3-Marth25,ID25
Fage 8 oH5
o Paving and Grading Plans
o Lighting Photometrics Plan
o Electrical Lighting Layout Plan
o Ele�trical Riser and Details.
• Prepare 60%-level mst estimate.
• ConductQ.4/QCofthe60%plans.
• Su6mit 60%plans[o the City Departments for review.
• Attend one(1) all-day mmment resolution 'opemhouse' to review comments provided by the various
City departments. In order to ezpedite resalution fmm conflicting mmments/directives, Ihis all-day
'opemhouse' will allow the team ro have targeted mrnersatians to find resolutians to mnflicting
dire<tives received from different departments. The expectation is that bweeks prior to the s<heduled
'opemhouse' all City Department mmments and feedbatk are fumished to CGA far evaluation, as we
need to assess what critical resolutions are needed and who to schedule for a time-certain resaWtion
meeting.
• Prepare a romment response package.
• Modify the 60% plansto address all mmments received and[he resolution directives.
TASK 3—AGENCV PERMITTING
• Submitpermitsto:
o FDEPforaCCCLPermit
o FWCforaCCQLightingPermit.
• Meet with agencies to ensure all required documents are provided as needed ta abtain final approval
of the overall plans.
TASK 4-90%PWNS PREPARATION
• Prepare90%constructionplans.
• Prepare90%-level<ostestimate.
• Prepare 90%-level technical specifications(the City shall be responsible for all front-end dowments�
• ConduclQA/QCofthe90%plans.
• Submit90%planstotheCityDepartmentsforreview.
• Attend one(l) half-day romment resalution'open-house'to review comments provided by the various
City departments. The expeciation is ihat 2-weeks prior ta the scheduled 'open-house' all City
Department mmmen[s and feedback are furnished to CGA for evalua[ion, as we need to assess what
critical resolutions are needed and who to schedule for a time-certain resolution meeting.
• Prepare a mmment response package.
• Madify the 90%plans to address all comments received and the resolution directives and prepare the
package for permitting.
TASK 5—CITY-DEPARTMENT PERMITTING
• Submitpermitsto:
o City of Miami Beach Right-of-Way permit.
• Suhmit m Clty of Miami 9each's Building Department for a dry-run review. (Note—Ihe con[ractor will
make the official submittal to the Building Department.)
TASK 6—FINAL PLANS AND BID DOCUMENTS
• Make necessary modifications to the plans to address mmments from the RighPof-Way permit and
'Dry-Run' permit pmress
r15F 01-33-6M]—MarcM1 35,308
Page 9 of 15
• Prepare a mmment responze package.
• Finalirethe100%ronstructionplans.
• Finalizeihe100%-levelmstestimate.
• Finalize the 100%-level [echnical specifications (the Ciry shall 6e responsible for all front-end
dacuments)
• Conduct QA/4C of the S00%plans.
• Submitthe100%packagerofheCityforuseduringBidding.
TASK7-PROIER MANAGEMENT
• Project & Qient Management- Design team mordination during the design and permitting pmcess to
ensure[he projec[progresses on schedule. This indudes internal progress meetings,caordination with
the team, mordination wi[h adjacent projetts and development, answering/provfding information
requests from the City or interested stakeholders, schedule updates, budget control and invoice
processing, addressing dieM mmments, meeting minutes, and supporting dacumentatian for design
and permitting. Overall dienl mordination to keep Ihe Ci[y aware of the projecYs progress, budget,
schedule,and uitical design decisions during the construction documen[preparation process.
• quality Assurance/Quality Control - Review of the mntract dacuments prior to each phase submittal
through intemal disciplinary reviews,cross-checking,mns[ructability review,as well an in-house review
by a professional not directly involved with Ihe prqect. Note-The fees for this service are induded in
each task when the QA/QC activitywould occur.
ASSUMPTIONS
The only services induded in this con[ract are [hose specifically identified above. The following are additional
assumptions for[his contract, indusive of and beyond thase stated elsewhere in[Fis document:
• Attendance to the identified public meetings are induded. Attendance at additional meetings can be
hilled at the mntracted hourly rates.
• PermitapplicationandreviewfeesshallbetheresponsibilityoftheCity.Anyadditionalpermitrequired
but not specifiwlly listed or obtained hy CGA are to be Ihe responsibility of the awarded Contractor.
• For schedule assumptions, City shall provide CGA with submittal review mmments within fikeen (15)
working days of receiving[hem.
• In order to meet the schedule, the assumption is that Ciry Staff will make reasonable efforts to make
themselves available for any required meetings.
• Engineering of improvementr within Ihe Righbof-Way are based on the assumption that the only
improvements needed farthe roadway is milling and resurfacing the exiscing asphalt areas and that all
roadway sub-base are structurally sound and are not in need for repair.
• Allworkisassumedtohelimitedtoandmn[ainedwlthintheOceanOriverighbof-way. Thissmpedoes
not indude any impacts to the wrb radii at the intersections of Ocean Drive with intersec[ing streets
and it does not include modifications to the existing crosswalk locations in the north-south direction
located on the west side of Ocean Drive.
• The smpe is based on [he assumption that the existing drainage on Otean Drive is tunctional and
sufficient.
ASP Ol-2b6t63-Mar[h d5,30E5
Gage 10 ot 15
EXCLUSIONS (SUBIERTOADDRIONA�FEES)
The following services are NOT induded in this praposal and will be considered Additional Services, which will
be addressed in a separate mntractual agreement The services indude but are not limited ro:
1. Archltecmral, structural Q.e., retaining walls, bridges, docks), mechanical (I.e., Flre pumps�, fire
protection, georechnical and testing, envimnmental assessment, power, gas, telephone, cable
television servi<es.
2. Calculations for needed fire flow for site demands, bazed on building type use and size, if required.
3. Calalations of off-site flood stages.
4. Construction quality mntml inspections.
5. Off-site engineering and negotiations for off-site easements.
6. Permitapplicationornegotiationwithpermittingauthoritieso[herthanthosespecificallylistedherein.
7. Preparationofmnstructiomm�tractdocuments,otherffiandrawingsandtechnicalspecifications(e.g.,
hid schedule,project manual).
8. Professional land surveying not induded in the smpe of services (i.e., buried utility investigation,
easement research,condominium documents, project stake-out and zs-built drawings�.
9. Profenional servires required due to mnditions different from Ihose itemized under the Smpe of
Services or due ro events beyond the control of Calvin,Giordano&Associates, Inc.
lU. Professional services required for redesign, due m changes initiated hy the CLIENT, their
representatives,agents,or other consWtants akerthe approval from the Hismric Preservation Board is
obtained.
11. Review of shop drawings.
12. fteview and approval af Contractor pay requests.
13. Review of Data supplied by the CLIENT (i.e.GIS da[a sets, databases, aerial images, etc) required for
integration into this project.
14. Review of shop Arawings for contractoror Client selected alternatives,materials, products,etc.
15. Special shop drawing annotation and modification ro expedite shop drawing approval process.
16. Structural engineering documents and calculations.
17. Traffic engineering services.
18. Utilityplansforsewe�modif¢ationsorreplacements.
19. Orainage design, induding modifications ro existing curb and gutters, and any asmciated drainage
permits.
20. Drainage analysis and evaluations.
21. Permitting with the Florida Departmen[of Transportation (FDOT) or Miami-Dade County Department
of Traffic and Public Works(DTPW) are exdudetl in their entirery.
MEETING ATTENOANCE
Due to the difficul[ies of predic[ing [he number or duration ot meecings, no mee[ings o[her than those lis[ed
above,are included in the 5<hedule of Fees.
We are availa6le ro answer any questions you may have.
Thank you.
With �ndRegards,
�'�v/'V
David Stambaugh, PE
Vice President of Professional Services
ASA Ol-22-6E6]—MmcM1]5,3@5
Page 11 of 15
E%HIBIT A—PROPOSED FEE BREAKOOWN
(SPECIFIC TO THE LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN DRIVE AND LUMMUS PARK)
Total Additional5ervices Fees: $254,485.30
Task Description Additional Fees Required to Comple[e
Task lA-Ol Coordination with Agencies $30,879.00
o Original Contract: $66,937.00
o Proposed: $97,816.00
7ask lA-W Data Collection 548,212.30
o Original Contract: $52,300.00
o Proposed: $100,51230
Task 1A-03 Srenario Evaluation $72,544.00
o Original Cantract 5362,720.00
o Proposed: $435,264.00
Task 1A-04 Report Preparation $60,100.00
o Original Contract: 562,280.00
o Propased: $122,380.00
Reimbursables: $42,750.00
o There is a possibility thac FDOT may require additional Dynamic Traffic Analyses on the data that has
been mllected to evaluate/mnfirm calibration of the data and findings of the various scenarios that will
he evaluated. For[he purposes of determining a mst amount for these possible additional analyses,
we are assuming that the total number of DTAs that muld potentially be requested may not eaceed
three (3) additional �TAs, each at a unit cost of 514,250.00. It is our understanding that, as a
reimbursable expense,prior written authorization from the Ciry shall 6e required prior to execu[ing any
works tasks associated with [hem.
ASN 0-33�6M3-MarcM1 35,3035
Gage 13 0(15
REVISED(2024.07.17�'EXHIBIT E'TO THE BASE CONTRACT
(SPECIFIC TO THE LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN DRIVE AND LUMMUS PARK�
PROIER SCHEDULE�REVISEO)
The following are anticipated and estimated timez(orthe completion of smpe of work, as detailed in Schedule
A. Please note that,partimlarly with mordination and review of boards and agencies,mme review and
approval processes may impact the schedule and prolong the duration of work beyond the rontrol of Calvin,
Giordano&Asmciates, Inc.or its sub-ronsWtants. These indude:
• Florida Department of Transportation
• Florida Department of Environmental Protec[ion
• Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
• Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Puhlic Works
• City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board
KEY MILESTONE DATES(REVISEO)
Overall,this praject is estimated to[ake approzimately 3.4 years to mmplete. Revisions to key estimated
milestone dates are identified as follows:
Original Revised Date
06.09.2023 Notice ta Proceed is issued
0616.2024 Determination&Atceptance of Traffic Engineering Methodology
by MDC-DTPW on configuration aptions for Ocean Orive
- Revision Note: Revised date resulting from the amount of time it
took to ohtain reviews,approvals,and concurrency from hoth
DTPW and F�OT on the methodology and smpe.
luly.2025 City Commission to select and approve design cross-section for
Ocean Drive
August1025 FDOTDynamicTrafficAssignmentStudyforselectedcross-sectionco
wmmence
Sep[ember2025 Pu61ic Engagement for Lummus Park Commenres and mntinues
through October
Decem6er.2025 Anticipated targe[date for receipt af agency permits
February1026 Completion of 30%Plans. Historic Preservation 8oard(HP6)
Pre-meeting
March1026 HPB Final Submission
May.2026 Final approval by Histaric Preservation Board for 6ath Orean
Drive and Wmmus Park
August.2026 60% PlansCompleted. CommenceCCCLPermi[tingwithFDEP
�ecember2026 90% Plans Completed. CCCL Permit[ing completed.
January.2027 Finalize all permitting
February1027 100%Plans for Orean Drive
Notes:
1 The projecYs delay is resulting from the amaunt of time it took to obtain reviews,approvals,and
concurrenry from both DTPW and FDOT on the methodalogy and scope, and it reflects the time needed m
complete the studies requested by the agencies.
2 In order to make-up for the project time dedicated to ohtaining and securing approvals to the traffic
engineering methadology and performing it,City Staff requested[hat[he project he re-structured to ezpedite
[he process hy rollapsing some smpe items inm congruen[efforts. As such,Ihis approach has resulted in
PSA Ol-II-636E—MarcM1 25,3@5
Page 13 0�15
modifications to the schedule where the work tasks associated with the original scope will be wllapsed
acmrdingly.
ASSUMPTIONS
This schedule is tentative,as it is dependent on several assumptions and faciors that are 6eyond the mntrol of
Calvin,Giordano&Associates, Inc.or its sub-mnsWtants,all of which may impact the schedule and the
milestone dates furnished. The assumptions that have been made as a basis of this schedule indude:
1. The schedule is based on the smpe of work[hat has 6een fumished.
2. City Staff and City Commission will pravide feedback on recommendatians and reques[s with<learly-
stated,decisive directives,without requesting unreasonable amounts of design ezplorations or revisions
to[he design approach.
3. City Commission is expet[ed to select one ot the three options for O<ean Drive,as generally described in
the adopted ADCD Plan. �irectives to explore hyhrid versions of the design options may require
additlonal design iime and may prolong the overall schedule.
4. Review mmmen[s and feedhack will he provided by City Staff within 2-weeks'time aker plans and
design materials are furnished for City Staff review.
5. When design plans are furnished to City Staff for review and comment,all departments shall furnish
commen[s consistent with a[horough and complete review of the materials provided. Review
mmments collected from the various City Departments will he provided wholesale and not pieremeal.
City Staff[o review all commen[s ohtained from in[ernal depar[ments and pravide dear dire<tions on
how to address each,either in writing or in a mmment resolution meeting. Where delayed or after-the-
fact comments are received,accompanied with requests or directives for modifications to the design,
these will be evaluated to determine their impact on the overall schedule.
6. The courtesy review of the Hismric Preservation Board will be accommodated in an a6ridged timeline
since formal approvals will not be sought at that spe<ific meeting.
7. When requests for directives are provided to City Staff, City Staff will furnish dear,decisive directives
within 5 business days'time.
8. Miami-Dade Countywill furnish responses ta studies,recommendatians, and ques[ions within a
reasona6le amount of time, not to exceed 30 days.
9. City Staff will participate in coordination meetings with representatives of the Flarida Department of
Environmental Protection and with representatives of Ihe Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission in good
faith to find an accepta6le 'middle-ground'to achieve lighting throughout[he project while balancing
the environmental res[ric[ions surrounding turtle-nesting and wildlife. Any impasses between City Staff
and FDEP/FWC shall only serve to prolong and delay the project.
10. I[ems placed on Commission and Committee agendas will be scheduled in a[imely fashian and are
expected[o be heard when scheduled and not deferred.
11. Ciry Staff and 8uilding Department review mmments shall 6e clearly stated,thorough and specificm[he
project.
I[ is important to note that delays may be mmulative and,depending on how the delayed task is situated wi[hin
the overall sequence ot work,the time lost due to the delay may not be made up. As such,delays will be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis and the milestone dates will 6e revised acmrdingly.
asa oi-zz�ezez-marcn zs,zazs
Page 14 ot 15
EXHIBIT F-PROPOSED FEE BREAKDOWN
(SPECIFIC TO THE SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN DRIVE)
At the request of City Staff,the following cost breakdown is provided:
Task Description Fees Required Fees Required
ta Complete to Gomplete
Sidewalk Lighting
Replacement Impravements
Task 1 Data Collection&Evaluation $ 2,964.00
Concept Design&Outreach Process $ 32,805.00
30%SchematicPlan $ 19,070.00 $ 6,804.00
HPBAppraval $ 16,548.00
7ask 2 60%Construction Plans Preparaiion 5 82,730.00 $ 21,600.00
Task3 AgencyPermitting $ 13,490.00 $ 8,236.00
7ask4 90%PlansPreparation 5 33,818.00 $ 12,030.00
TaskS City-DepartmentPermitting $ 5,324.00
Task 6 Final Plans and Bid Documents $ 16,�66.00 $ 3,921.00
Sub-total $ 222.815.00 $ 52,591.00
Task 7 Project Management(4%) $ 8,91200 $ 2,103.64
Tatal $ 231,727•60 $ 54,694.64
Total Fees:
• Sidewalk Replacement Only $ 231,727.60
• SidewalkReplacemenNLighcinglmprovements +$ 54,694.64=$ 286,422.24
ASN O]�3b6361-MartM1 d5,3035
Pa@e l5 o!15
EXHIBIT G—ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
(SPECIFIC TO THE SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN ORIVE)
The following are anticipated and estimated times forthe completion of scape of work. Please no[e[hat,
partimlarlywi[h coordination and review of boards and agencies,same review and approval processes may
impact the schedule and prolong the duretian of work 6eyond the mntrol of Calvin,Giardano&Associates, Inc.
or its suh-mnsultants. These include:
• Florida Department of EnVifonmental PrOteCtiOn
• FloridaDepartmentofTransportation
• Miami-Dade County Department of Transportatian and Pu61ic Works
• City of Miami eeach Historic Preservation Board
KEY MILESTONE TARGET DATES
Key estima[ed milestone dates are identified as follows, based on a receipt of an NTP no later than 4/25/2025.
If the NTP is received later[han[he noted date,all milestones will need to 6e adjusted acmrdingly:
Middan.2025 Finalize Oata Collection&Evaluatian
March2025 CompletePublicOutreach
Apri1.2025 PresentationtaCiryCommission
Apri125.2025 Issuance of NTP
lune.2025 Preliminary30%PlansComplete; HPBPre-BidMeeting
lu1y1025 HPBFinalSubmittal
September.2025 HPBApproval
Decemher.2025 60%Construction Plans Completed; Commenre CCCL Permi[
Apri12026 90%Construc[ion Plans Completed; CCCL Permit Finalized
May.2026 Finalire all Permitting
lune.2026 100%Construc[ion Plans Completed
REVISED SCHEDULE B
REVISED CONSULTANT COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
(attached)
:�o.
WmmmPad 56%
IOn{Iml � �n� 19Mon Wmmusnark
co.mn ..em.mo� <om..n as<K.�s.un•
�mown m�o.m
oui mam meecounryandtFeC�yo�Mam�eeam 5 -� � � - � ' �`
� 5
on„[p�'aysesa�da.eommmea�om 5 �� � - � �
uua rrorepan�o�BSubmmmwntinneNm�u 5 �eL� � � _ � �^.� +• � . s+�� .v,3 .v
1 GUEIkEnp6emmt 5 39.DOW $ ' S 39�3IOW . i..�i...i ..1.. ,�
IC01 Gry[ommnsananE[ommlrslarvCammlvre0plaePreunta4onr $ 4�616�15 - 5 <8.616W . ...1.11. , . .�+ -.
PPRil509iOiPL $ 631p33.W 5 ]11�35J0 $ W1,958J0 � �.�.Ivt�S 5 <]E616b5
onN..i �.e.e a<x �sry
co.��n �.e�mo� com�.n ns�,K�.s.ss ��^^•�>:,x
a.o�.� a�wm
iar�xnox ioeoc�aoh��mrv.r � � 5 usnaao 5 � 5 us,oxw �s�.. � .-�- ��
n:�owa unervmKmorva�em..:neaio� 5 �s,smw 5 - 5 is,smm , . .i .,� , m.. -a�
i543P� nlgrvrtleeam�maColim�onA�O�nanaM+ew,anaPmleWol�valpbl¢ $ p5.91100 5 - 5 15,91SC0 � ��.e.Ee 5 89WIe
� ^apOevtlopm¢m 5 3pMW 5 5 '� � 5
iahxed6 cenlumaw�imc�y5taxanF'inaiFlnemgr 5 m 5 - 5 � � � e S
vs4Enn1 maneroen[oncenwaloer.¢n 5 �n93om 5 - 5 �t9,se�nm , n� i�po 5 , su
as43Mo� 5 0 5 - 5 - 0 5
Lrk1B-03 Sb4e�alEer�Pesm�nbnnntlfatlEahSolielO�ion 5 3?N9.00 $ - 5 1J.YSW � W 5
s43Bd3 ID(�5¢MngMevlinµ 5 0 $ � $ � 1 5 I6�61a.56
iuk160n NumncPrtrewtlonBoartl-inrylalforuulutlon $ � 40 5 - $ . � � i ..iw 5 9�366W
vnxw� ert�camm...m.,�ecomm�w�commn�auoa=��P,se���io�• 5 �e,z�zoo s - s •e,s�eoo > .n�.o.+ s n,zzase
i„wzo m ..vow�M�RP��ime�m,no.,inmom.� s :+,o..ao s - s n.aum , ,_ d.,, , ii...,.�
anAix va-ima� 5 sv3vf.m 5 � 5 sn.xm.m , m.vze 5 tas,w�m
M%
pl[I^al RmmGM Oaean Or�o�onCl,
<o OrN 4menEmmt01 �sunl B SI�eNSS15 �ummufPod
nrM]PL� _u�oi . 5 ;6]EW 5 ' S . LYI . .b )u
�ukum � ^ +�anairaRcconwnmamEmuv 5 , o0 5 - 5 3slsmm . ,a,..o�
na3 5 m 5 5
nsbnW 5 w 5 - 5
➢sb/.o5 GeoleanmaalEn¢nee�nngnmin`il�a�5u0pmmWuntl 5 ES.WOW 5 - 5 �S,WOO]
Ln3n06 Subsury[e u�IliYy[ngmeMng b�a5uemuul�mq $ W.DOLLW 5 - $ 60.W0.m e +�a0000
Ps43W01 �`°D��a�mrWSCM1emaua0o�gn Plans�3PIFIerclOcelopmmtef 5 g�,��,W $ ' S 9]a01.W . .�.xe�0
<omOueOenPlans�
Os49�IL2 arloPmerva4onBeaN-Pmlev'anE�ppmnl 5 I6.W8N $ - $ 16.064W f .EpvtlOfl
iuk3�IL3 �ol�vryn�mlopmenlVlam�6G%JctlOeceloOmm[ol � 115i1W➢] 5 - $ � - .�+no.00
ansl
iar43�f0E Pr�elmnaqPermi[lin{ $ 40.G10W $ - 5 li4.E14W � �� �
pevzlo0menm(Nf6onry^oe.elaOmm�Pbns 5 m $ ' S
. �lins $ 39pILL00 5 - $ J9,016W
asL3LL0] ianOnvinp 5 33.�S100 5 - $ l3,INW
Ps43/.1W BUIlEIn6�Ynmm�OqPun 5 Vp9600 $ - 5 1)]96W + �
•303 PrariEeBl[�¢umen�s $ 0 $ ' S �
issM3P11a 9�rwII $ 61600 5 - $ 616W . .IL.N
Psk30-01 ^o�Y�ematl[MrI�nPIamPO%Icel�melo0m¢mM 5 H].81800 $ - 5 l3E.E16W t3E91BW
mna.uman Penxl
. PaarE-PalewanG�00�wa1 5 0 5 - $ � 360BBW
♦aY3603 Imllntovol30%ConsOue�lenPhm $ 31.@940 5 - $ 3i3O]9W
lasM3B-W Si6^all 5 61640 $ � 5 616W 6160�
� V�qrtssMx�Npl�me6K�rs� S � � 5 5 196.a91.W ) ..a���r � m9P.lo3
VPPi3 SYeiOu� 5 LAIARW S � S l.in45bm 5 �!-•� ^+����� 5 w3d6l.R
M%
Lummus�Vn4 SH
.» .�.e�a
m��o.,�' a,..em..�o� n�.m � ss��..�s ssa�. wmm�.o„x
•xavc�m��.�.wm4do.mx�r,mcw.� .,- .
ra�s�m s x, o s zu.ves. 0 5 ao?czeao s
Vro�mmanagemmt�N[lutlmgqmllry4ru.ma/dmlirycontmil-n% 5 5 9.63553 � � �'
weamai s 0. � 5 o s vwzRsen s s s
x.�mewume[u.wulma..vo.�.eM�xearvimo��..on�.eoe���omvl s x 5 o s . � . ..
ia41 5 3p30.W9]0 $ lN�Y530 5 ;9Hyl5.W 5 ;[03,8)6.59 5 L1�0,656V
.�ae.:wa�o� s e,sw.w
m.an��m c o��..,m r.aa�. 5 �
3M5[�emTlaPhn 5 }S.BIIp] . ..
HPBlppmval 5 y<B.W � �
E4%WmWctlenPlamPmyan�lon 5 �- '�
R[enryPnmR6na 5 IIp16W � . �"
j �
cnro.p.mm.�ro.�m�m.a 5 �s.nua . � �
r��nm,..a�aemoa..m..n s � �
wo-�mi S s
r�olen w..a.m�•olaxl 5 �
*am 5 xK�zxa 5 z�s,�zzza
pmFal �menaea
�mmam..�oi es�...�.s.�s wmm.�r.n
5 A�4wz.m 5 sa9W.s� S azso,zsr.v s z,ozo,zse.en s Lva.cze.a�
. x x a
€ a
. a : a
, s i
9 • � � � �
. i � 3 fr 8
� r. .
. � 9 9 2 &
a i
. a v s
3 „
. � H _ a
! ,
p c .
" . - 8
d >
F
� ; s
- % e
� 9
P � � . „ fr 8
3 .
a � � y
a
3
4
^v 9
� .
U 9�s g
m S Z _
W
p v
o ; a
w o . _
m g .
m
U
" ' l3 � F
� E� � ; � � 3
: , �
� ' g
9298988898� BB.9.9999p99 98B8 8 93
� �' � 1Y9�6�gR� . ..��SCa:&3- &sjf:§d�_� 8B:'. �6�
m �I . _ .. . ,.
W "___., . _.............. ...�.......... ...............
U
O
S � ! _ �a�; :P:S �� i
EE �€;-E �:� F ` i.`s�i°1:;'E �.:i._ a.
w yu:i3e �i 9'.eis'c3=;n5S �?ei!� .'�@
Y'a v�E I• st �5Y 3�`3� 8�s�. $5'
y �7i€3589� r9��I�'�i�� �ii�s€€Fi__ ��e��:��i�➢
o°
' 8 8
9 . S :
�
` � ~ ~ 6 B
B
� .
e Y . R
3 -
. _ � � ^ . . _ •e q . , p
i
3 .
s . - e
p '
i -
' - " ' " ' g
� g
3 ^
s = a s
a i`s
_ 9 � � 9 � 9M � � gp
S .
i
• 9 8 9 8
a �
� .
'� �.. Y R .. 9 a . .. . Y � � 3
a .
y B 3
p H 3
a '
� '
S ^
. „ 3
� �
^^ � 8
� �
U '
m ss e a
:
o � -
$ ,
w � .
� se . ' s �; 1{ k
� 3� � 6 L 6
W � � y
6
E 88988689 � 98998B88B6 HBB8868868 � 898% B9B= �
' B5 :f:A68k 6i::9':58 RS:F.RBE.^.FS 9B:.�. 663:
� �� ..__.......... ..............,..� ......�.._»...... .,.,.._».,.,...,
m
w
U
p : - . 'e
� ' u
3 '5= ^ =
m t§s= __ • S �
o = Fr. 3 's EeiF;" "r_ 3 :
> �: �€if � °! �ee �i: �.�:�e�9��'s 3 Fg:: a?�
� .aa• f`e^. e .- , a - _&. Y�t3e- o
w xo$�a54yF E af:� y8iE 5 :yCn€• x �'= eg8?
y ig eFFo4a $^v €"sF3ai3i E.=5:ia F
33.�vIiS�� eza,.:�.a,a$e 3ii��.._w�^^ ��aaF°s.=�e�F
�
0
i
� � � � m m _ � � � 8
E
z
g ' »
S
� e a
§ _ ,
., .. .. . �° .. e .. m . e e ry .,. .,. 8
7 § m m
m e s s � , a
y �
me � _ .. . S : - � � m = _ 8
Y -
S E E E f
Ex ; ; =
o a 3 7
a� 3 M '
8888e o80888888 ��i SS000888, 88, { 88$8 a88 .
� � .. .. .. .. � �. .. .. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ., 08 � ^ - � e8m � 588
V
W a
� nY'b - F � W ^ � EL�u ^-` - F
W CiE `ac `eE - cF "= `-� _ o ` E g9 � c cS � V tlF "ce � � E
m � � G � ^w.LFw csGY Od `nECEUEu y 'J� �uF '� �tSi ¢
� d _ 6 � Gi oE _ _ _v2v ` � Y' � uu � E
� � ve � „ � , , , � ao�aa „ _ »3s SaMw � w � w � � � � zoas& m_M � a
a
0
0
m
w
U
O
W
y
3
o°
REVISED SCHEDULE E
REVISED LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SCHEDULE
(attached)
ASA Ol-33-6]6E—March 35,ID35
Page 1]of 15
REVISED(2024.07.17�'EXHIBIT E'TO THE BASE CONTRAR
(SPECIFIC TO THE LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN DRIVE AND LUMMUS PARK�
PROIER SCHEDUIE(REVISED)
The following are anti<ipated and estimated times far the comple[ion of s<ope of work,as detailed in Schedule
A. Please note that,particularlywith coordination and review of hoards and agencies,some review and
approval processes may impact the schedule and prolongthe duration of work beyond the mntrol of Calvin,
Giordano&Assaciates, Inc.or its sub-consultants. These indude:
• Florida Department of Transportation
• Plorida Department of Environmental Pmtection
• Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
• Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works
• City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board
KEY MILESTONE DATES�REVISED)
Overall,this project is estimated ta take approzimately 3.5'years m mmplete. Revisions to key estimated
milesmne dates are identified as follows:
Original Revised Date
06.092023 Notice to Proceed is issued
06.26.2024 Determination &Acceptance of Traffic Engineering Methadology
by MDC-DTPW om m�figurafion options for Orean Drive
- Revision Note: Revised date resulting from the amount of time it
took[o obtain reviews,approvals, and mncurrenry fmm both
DTPW and FDOT on the me[hadolagy and scope.
luly.2025 CityCammissiontoselectandapprovedesigncross-sectionfor
Ocean Drive
AugusL2025 FDOTDynami<TrafficAssignmentStudyforselectedcross-sectionta
mmmence
September1025 PuhlicEngagementforLummusParkCommencesandcontinues
through Octaber
December1025 Anticipatedtargetdateforreceiptofagencypermits
February.2026 Completion of 30%Plans. His[oric Preservation Board (HPB)
Pre-meeting
March.2026 HPB FinalSubmission
May.2026 Final approval hy Historic Preservation Board for hoth Ocean
Drive and Wmmus Park
AugusL2026 60%PlansCompleted. CommenceCCCLPermittingwithFDEP
December1026 90%PlansCompleted. CCCLPermittingmmpleted.
lanuary. 20D Finalize all permitting
February.2027 S00%PlansforOceanDnve
Notes:
1 The project's delay is resulting from the amount of time it mok ro obiain reviews,approvals,and
mncurrency from both �TPW and FDOT on the methodology and scope,and it reflects[he time needed to
complete the studies requested bythe agencies.
2 In order to make-up for the project time dedicaced to a6taining and securing approvals to Ihe traffic
engineering methodology and performing it, City Staff requested thatthe project be re-structured to expedite
the process 6y collapsing some scope irems into congruent efforts. As such,this approach has resulted in
nsa m-zaszcz-marcn zs,zass
vaee i3 ot is
modifications to the schedule where the work tasks asmciated with the original scope will be collapsed
acwrdingly.
ASSUMPTIONS
This schedule is tentative,as it is dependent on several assumptfons and factors that are 6eyond Ihe wn[rol of
Wlvin, Giordano&Associates, Inc.or its suh-mnsultants,all of which may impact the schedule and the
milestone dates fumished. The assumptions that have heen made as a basis of[his schedule indude:
1. The schedule is based on[he smpe of work that has been furnished.
2. City Staff and City Commission will provide feedback on recommendations and requests with dearly-
stated,decisive directives,without requesting unreasanahle amounts of design explorations or revisions
to the design approach.
3. City Commission is expected to select one of the three options for Ocean Drive,as generally descri6ed in
[he adopted ADCD Plan. Directives to explore hyhrid versions ofthe design options may require
addicional design time and may prolong the overall schedule.
4. Review mmments and feed6ack will be provided 6y City Staff within 2-weeks'time after plans and
design materials are furnished for City Staff review.
5. When design plans are furnished to Ciry Staff for review and mmment,all departments shall furnish
mmments mnsistent with a Ihorough and complete review of the materials provided. Review
mmmen[s mllected from Ihe various City Departmen[s will be provided whalesale and not piecemeal.
City Staff to review all mmments o6tained from intemal departments and provide dear direc[ions on
howto address each,either in writfng or in a mmment resolution meeting. Where delayed or akervthe-
fac[commen[s are received,acrompanied with reques[s or dire<tives for modifications to Ihe design,
these will be evaluated to deteimine[heir impact on the overall schedule.
6. The murtesy review of the Historic Preservation Board will be acrommodated in an ahridged timeline
since formal approvals will not he sought at tha[specific meeting.
7. WhenrequestsfordirectivesarepravidedtoCityStaff, CityStaffwillfurnishdear,decisivedirec[ives
within 5 6usiness days'time.
8. Miami-0ade County will furnish responses to studies,remmmendations,and questions within a
reasonahle amount of time, notto exceed 30 days.
9. City Staff will participate in mordination meetings with representatives of[he Florida Department of
Environmental Protec[fon and with representatives of Ihe Florida Fsh and Wildlife Commissian in good
faith to find an acrepta6le'middle-ground'to achieve lighting throughout the projec[while 6alancing
the ernironmental res[ric[ions surrounding turtle-nesting and wildlife. Any impasses between City Staff
and FDEP/FWC shall only serve ta prolong and delay the project.
30. Items plared on Commission and Committee agendas will be scheduled in a timely fashion and are
expected to 6e heard when scheduled and not deferred.
11. City Staff and Building Department review comments shall he dearly stated,thorough and specific to the
project.
It is impor[ani m note that delays may be<umulative and, depending on how the delayed task is situated within
the overall sequenre of work,the time lost due to the delay may not be made up. As such,delays will he
evalua[ed on a case-by-case hasis and the milesmne dates will 6e revised accordingly.
SCHEDULE E-7
SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SCHEDULE
(attached)
A910L3b6M3-MarcF25,2@5
Page 15 of 15
EXHIBIT G—ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
(SPECIFIC TO THE SHONT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO OCEAN DRIVE)
The following are anticipated and estimated times forthe completion of srope of work. Please note Ihat,
particularlywith coordination and review of boards and agencies,some review and approval processes may
impact the schedule and prolong the duretian of work 6eyond the control of Calvin,Giordano&Associates, Inc.
or its suh-mnsultants. These include:
• Florida Departmen[of Environmental Protection
• FloridaDepartmen[ofTransportation
• Miami-Dade County Department of Transpor[ation and Pu61ic Works
• City of Miami eeach Historic Preservation Board
KEY MILESTONE TARGET DATES
Key estimated milesfone dates are identified as follows, based on a receipt of an NTP no later[han 4/25/2025.
If the NTP is received later than the noted date,all miles[ones will need to 6e adjusted accordingly:
Mid-lan2W5 Finalize Data Collection & Evaluation
March.2025 CompletePu6licOutreach
Apri1.2025 Presentation to City Cammission
April 2i2025 Issuance of NTP
lune2025 Preliminary 30%Plans Comple[e; HPB Pre-Bid Meeting
July.2025 HPB FinalSuhmi[tal
Septemhec2025 HPBApproval
Decemhec2025 60%Canstruction Plans Completed;Commence CCCL Permit
ApriL2026 90%Cons[ruction Plans Completed;CCCL Permit Finalized
May.2026 Finalize all Permitting
lune.2026 100%Construction PlansCompleted
RESOLUTION NO. Z02533690
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI
BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ARCHITECTURAL AND
ENGINEERING (AIE) DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT BE7WEEN THE CITV OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA AND CAL41N, GIORUANO AND ASSOCIAiES, INC.,
FOR THE OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS AND LUMMUS PARK
ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, IN iHE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF f540,907.54,
FOR ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
RELATED TO INCREASED SCOPE RESULTING FROM CHANGES TO AGENCY
REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TRAFFlC STUDY METFIODOLOGY AND ADDITIONAL
SERVICES RESULTING FROM RESOLUTION 202433337, DIRECTING THE
ADMINISTRATION TO TAKE THE NEXT STEPS TO IMPLEMENT LIGHTING AND
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS,SUBJECTTOAPPROVAL OF THE SIXTH CAPITAL
BUDGET AMENDMENT TO THE FY 2025 CAPRAL BUDGET.
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2019, the City issued a Requesl for Qualifications (RF�) for a
lantl use, mobility, and economic development study oi the City's Mized-Use Enlertainment
("MXE") tlishict, also known as the Art �eco Cultural Distrid("ADCD" or Ihe "DishicP'); and
WHEREAS,on February 23,2022,�he City Commissbn acceptetl the ADCD Vision Plan,
in concept; and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2022, the City Commission authorized tha Administretion to
issue RFQ No. 2022-436-ND for Architectural and Design Services for[he Ocean Drive Cortidor
Improvements and Lummus Park Enhancement Project, as proposetl in the ADCD Vsion Plan;
and
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2022, the Cily Commission adopted Resolution 2�2232340
authorizing tbe City Manager to negotiate with Me top ranked proposer, Calvin, Giordano &
Associates, Inc. (GGA) and on June 6, 2023, lhe City executed an Agreement with CGA, in the
lolal amount of$2,720,04970�, and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2023, CGA was issued a Notice to Proceetl and commenced
meeting with the requlalory agencies antl prior to wmmencing the data wllec�ion, treffc analysis
and modeGng, it was necessary for CGA and the City to obtain concurrence from the regulatory
agencies; and
WXEREAS, concurrence trom the regulatory agencies on Me ire(fic sludy methotlology
was obtained from MDC in April 2024 and the FDOT in May 2024; and
WHEREAS, Ihe approved treffic sWdy methotlology resulted in addilional manhours
necessary to satisfy bolh regula[ory agencies, ihe mllection of iraRc data at addifional
intersections, the evaluation of addilional multiple scenanos and the preparation of additional
traffic models;and
WHEREAS, the approved traffic study methodobgy also requiretl the consultant to
evaluate several projecfs which will impad [he area of stutly that were not wnlemplated at the
fime of the ezeCulion agreement with CGA; and �
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2024, the City Commission adopled Resolution 20243337,
i
directing the Adminislration m take the necessary neM steps lo implement lighting and sidewalk
improvements as part of the Ocean Drive Cortidor Improvement project and
WNEREAS, on March 25, 2025, CGA has submitled a requeslfor additional services, for
the scope of work required to meet the specifications of the Miami-Dade DTPW and FDOT
approved iraKc s[udy methodology in the amount of $254,485.30, and for additional design
services for tFre implementatlon of lighting and sidewalk improvements along the Ocean Drive
Corridor, in the amount ol$286,422.24,for a total amount of$540.90Z54; and
WHEREAS Amendment No.t will revise the total conVact amount lo$3,260,95724.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BV THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF TNE qTY OF M WMI BEACH,FLORIDA that the Mayor and City Commission
approve and author¢e the Ciry Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional
Architectural antl Engineering (AIE) Services Agreement belween the City of Miami Beach,
Florida and Calvin Giadano and Associates, Inc. dated June 6, 2023 tor the provision of
adAitional Pmfessional Architecturel and Engineerfng Services for the tlesgn of the Ocean
Drive wrridor Improvements and Lummus Park Enhancement project, in the amount of
$540,907.54 for addilioeal architecturel and engineeiing design services related to agency
required additional traffc study methodology changes and addilional services resulting from
ResoNtion 202433337, direc�ing the Administration to take the neut steps to implement lighting
and sidewalk improvemen[s, subject to approval of ihe sixth capital budgel amendment to Ihe
FY2025 Capital 8udget.
PASSED and ADOPTED this a� day of�, 2025.
ATTEST: ��lX�t�_
Steven Meiner, Mayor
��InY 2 7 2015 APPROVED AS TO
Rafael Granado, Ciry Clerk FORM & LANGUAGE
�,'i_aE,q�� &FO ECUTION
:F' y
� ; ` ��5��2.r'
4 �IM[OAP 01AE�f GIIy A mey '- + Date
t� �`
,a ;:-•
.��M�fi�-
Resolutions -R7 M
MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Hono2ble Mayor and MemDers af Ihe Crty Commission
FROM: Enc Carpenter, Ciry Menager
DATE: May 21, 2025
TITLE� A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
ARGHITECTUR4L AND ENGINEERING (A!E) DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETNEEN THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA ANO CALVIN, GIORDANO
ANDASSOCMTES, INC.,FOR THE OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
AND LUMMUS PARK ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, IN THE NOT-T0.EXCEED
AMOUNT OF $540,907.54, FOR ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTUR4L AND
ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES RELATED TO INCREASE� SCOPE
RESULTING FROM CHANGES TO AGENCY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC
STUOY METHODOLOGY ANO ADOITIONAL SERVICES RESULTING FROM
RESOLUTION 2024-33337, DIRECTING THE ADMINISTR4TION TO TAKE TME
NEX7 STEPS 70 IMPLEMENT LIGHTING ANO SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS,
SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A FUTURE CAPITAL BUDGET AMENDMENT TO
TNE FV 2025 CAPITAL BUDGET.
RECOMMENDATION
The Administra6on recommends Mat the Mayor and Ciry Commission (City Commission) atlopt
ihe Resolutlon.
BACKGROUNDMISTORY
On February 23, 2022, the City Commission approved the Put Deco Gultu2l DisVict (ADCD)
Vision Plan, in co�ept and authonzed the Atlminlstration to issue RFQ No. 2022-436•ND for
Architectu�al antl Design Services for Me Ocean�rive Cortidor Improvements and lummus Park
Enhancement Prqecl. The ADCD Vision Plan is a study covering properties and raadways
adjacen� to commerciel wrridors, including Washington Avenue, Cdlins Avenue, OCBen Driv@,
and Lummus Park antl inGudes proposed conceplual pians, rewmmerMatbns fo�
implementation, a rough order of magnitutle cost estlmate, and a phasing plan.
On October 28, 2022, the City Commi55ion adopted ResWution 202232340 authonzing ihe City
Manager to nego6ffie with the top ranked proposer, Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Ina (CGA).
On June 8, 2023, �he Ciy executed ihe agreement with CGA, for NcMtedurel antl Engineering
(PJE) Desig� Services {Agreemenq, for the Ocean D�ve Corntlor Improvements and lummus
Perk Enhancement Projed (Project), in the total amount of$2,720,D4970.
The Agreement wiM CGA includes a feasibi�ity study to evaluate the three (3) confgura6on
options for Ocean DnVe between Sth and 15M Street, proposed in the ADCD Vision Plan. Option
o� (1) Mro-way vehicular access to Ocean Drive, option two (2) one-way vehicular access to
Ocean Drive an0 option three(3)tull pedestnanization of Ocean Dnve, The scope of work also
1953 of 2719
inclutles Me development of a Master Plan tor Lummus Park, obtaining Historic Preservation
Board (HPBI approvafs for bofh Ocean Odve and Lummus Park, development ol the 30%design
document for Lummus Park and ihe 100% bidtla6le consNuction Aocuments (or Ocean Drive
beMreen 5tl�and 75th Street, interseclug roads, and the t2nsitional area catnecting Ose2n Dnve
with Lummus Park. Additionally, CGA is to prepare antl condud a Ihorough process of public
outreach
ANALYSIS
GGA's Notice to Proceed was issued on June 9, 2023, and subsequen0y, CGA commencetl
meeting witb the regulatory agencies. Prior to commencing Ihe data collection, trafic analysis
end modelin9 (SWdy), it was necessary to obtain wncurrence Rom both regulalory agencies,
Miami-02de County Department W Transportation and Public Wotks (DTPW) and the Flonda
Department of Trensporta6on (FDO7). Fabwing numerous meetings, submittals by CGA and
reviews by the regulatory agencies, the necessary approval of the Study methodology was
obtainetl from the DTPW in Apnl 2024 and the FDOT in Mey 2024
The approveQ Study area and methodology, in contmst to t�at anticipateC in CGA's aiginal
proposal and Agreement, resulted in an increase lo the manhours necessary to satisry both
regulatory agencies. In atldilian, the Study requiretl by the requlatory agencies necessilates Me
collecfion of Iraffic data at additional intersections,the evaluation of additional multiple scenanos
and the preparafion of atltlibonal tratfic models. Further, U�e approved Study mefhoddogy
requires the tonsultant to evaluate several projecLs impactiry the area of study, such as the
ezisting Ocean Drive corMifions,closure o�Esparrola Way, antl tbe qoposed Miami-Dade Counry
plans for Bus Rapid Transil (BRT). This additional efrort, resWting fmm adtlitional regulatory
agency requirements Tof ihe Study, was not contemplated al the time of the execution oi the
Agreement with CGA.
In July 2024,CGA commenced collec[ing Me traffic data at different intersections and in October
2024 commeoced prepanng the Study for Me fhree (3)ADCD Vision Plan configureUoa options.
7he Study is euvently being finalized anC CGA will provide an update on the praliminary findings
af the next meeting of the Ciry Commission wfth tl�e formal recommendations to be Oresent2tl in
July 2025,once the Stutly has been presemed and discussed witli Me ragulatory agencies.
On Octoher 34 202a, the City Commissiort adopted ResoWUon 2�24-3337(ExMbd A), tlirecting
the Administretbn to take the necessary next steps lo implement Ighting and sidewalk
imprwemenl5 as part of the Projetl, inGuGing communiry engagement and required approvals
hom the HPB, Me GO Bond Oversght Commiqee and Ihe City Cammission, as well as the
preparalion of any necessary amendment to tt�e scope ofMe Atyeement.
On March 25, 2025, CGA submitted a ne9otiated proposal for services relaled to Uie adtlilbnai
scope of work necessary to comply with the requirements ot the DTPW and FDOT approvetl
haffic Study metliotlolopy, antl tor additional design services required to implement the lightlrg
and sitlewalk improvemenis dentifietl in the Resolution, along the Ocean Dnve comdor, in the
lotal amount oi$540,90754.
The proposal is Drdcen down inlo two (2) separate wmponenls (t) aAtlifional traffc study
requirements, in the amount of$254,485.30, and (2)ihe implemantation of lighting and sidawalk
improvements to Ocean Dnve in Me amount of$286,422.24, shoultl ihe Cfry Commission elect
to proteed wAb lhis 5cope. This Amentlment No. 1 (Fxhiba B)to the Agreement will invease the
total conVact amount from $2,720,049.70 to 53,260,95724.
1954 of 2719
City statt has reviewed the negotiated proposal(ar the atltli;ional services anq fountl it reasonable
For the effort requiretl from th0 Consultanl.
7he proposed timeline for completing [he lighnng and stlewalk improvements shoultl the Gry
Comm�ssion elect lo proceed with this sco0e and following an an6cipaled No6ce to Proceee on
May 21, 2�25, includes the preparation of Ihe thirty�percent plans. antl purswt of HPB approval
in September 2025. II IS ant�cipated Ihat an fmitation to Bid will be is5ued in Ju�e 2026 and
construchon will commence m October 2026.
Tbe pmposed timeline for completing ihe fu!ure GOB Pro�ect has been impacted Upon receipt of
direchon from the City Commission, m July 2025, the consultant wil� proceed wilh finalizing the
sNdy analysis wrth the regulalory agencies, commence with the thirty percent (30%�plans, o�tain
HPB approval in May 2026. issue an Invi!aucn to Bid ��n January 2027 and commenCe conslmclion
in May ZOP.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
7he rotal amendment of$540,907.54 partially uses prev�ously appropriateC pro�ect funds, w�th
$346,287.13 contingent on approval in a Future FY25 capital butlget amentlment.
Dces this Ordi�ance reauFre a Buseness Impact Estimate?
(FOR ORDINANCES ONLY)
It applicable, the Business Impad Estimate (BIE) was published on:
See BIE at: httpr!lwww.miamibeachfl.00vlcrtv-hall/citY-clerklmeetinq-noUces!
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
393-0820-�61357-00,410-57 6-00-00-00-2 2522 $194620A1
Subjecl to a fulure Capital Budget Amendment to FY25 $346 287.13
Tolal $540,907.54
CONCLUSION
The Administration rec�mmeods th2t tbe City Comnt65ion adopt the ResoWtion.
Apolicable Area
South Beach
Is this a "Residents Riqht fo Kr1ow" item. Is tbis item �elated to a G.O. Bontl
pursuant lo City Code Section 2-17? Proiect?
1955 of 2719
�
Yes Yes
Was this Anenda Item initiallv reouested Cv a lobbvist which as defined in Code Sec. 2�81.
includes a ori�cioal enaas7ed in IobbvinSl? No
If so, speCiy Ihe name of lobbyist(s) and principalls)�.
Department
Gapital Improvement Pro�ects
S anso s
Co-suonsor(sl
Condensed Title
Amendment 1, A/E Services for Ocean Dnve Corridor/Wmmus Park Pro�ecL CIP
Pre iaus Action (For CiN Clerk Use O�IyI
195E of 2719
t �..I�i� a
aesowrion�o. zazaas7a�
P NESOI OTION OF TME MAYDfl ANO qIYCOMMIS310M OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEAGH, FLONIUIa, OIRECT�NG THE APMIxISTRATION TO
TpNE NEMT STEPS TO IMPLEMENT �HE LIGXTING �NO SI�EWpLK
IMPROVEMENTS I15 PAR1 OF THE VOTEN-AFPRQVfD G.O 90MD
OCFAx DRIVECOfl0.1DORIMVROVEMENTPROJECT.
WHERE0.5,on NovemberE.2Gt3 M1Nam�Beam wiers app�^vb0�ea 5139nu:b�G O
ponc proj'dM 1�C "P'og'aT I �n O G�wdC w �e�ilenaVm la W�4 OiP4l� �nhBslryClem
imo'o�.eneris ��-�eingpolec�ciouaeaonenna cinq�umicq�arzs.anu
WHEREAi On �1ay �0 20'9.Ine Ciry ssuetl ReQuest�o�U�ald'sanonl No ^.0193J4-
NO b Tna � orvty, and c c �c���opneni 51uGy ol �nc GtyS AM1eC-Usr.
ErleYain�enl�MXE'iE�SV¢I giso k�vn�es R^M Ovco Cu�;u'a�qstucl("pOCD'y en�
WHEREn9 an JWy 3'. ¢0�9, per Resowuon No 10i}JC9ia. me Qry Comm�ss�on
aut�OnzPi nngo4a'ons V�Ih ZysNmc� Ih- tlbia 2VScomU Arcntleclsi"Zyscov¢n'I. Ine 'op
rankQc oi�tic�.ana aulho��red e�eG�uon o�an a3�eemert d�e9otiaecn5 we�e ser.cessNl.anQ
WHEREa6.onOucEer'�. ID20 nieC�:ye�nera0lntanp�Me%sunaiservicesayreeme�t
wiP Zyscw 2 as autnorza.d oy Resal„uoc No 3C20�)1IBP�o Deveop�Oe 0.000 Nsion P�ar.
an�
WNEREAS, :n¢ Mayo:z nrt Oem Cun�mi OiSvc Panei nne 'Pa�m"/�.ae c.ea<ae.m
Dece�noei � 2oZo, eY Mayor �an Geibe� o-ia_am b Ser.non 2�-2)(oNll c� ire Gry Ceoe io
pronne recommenca0o�s re3erOng me PO(:0 ana xlnse 2/smv,ch an�
WNEFEAS.iY¢ Penal i¢+mwen I�elOCO V�Sion Pldr. dn� alle-dlerrg Irelbdf4�n
ans5'n an� mplemeriaean )yswrrn up�dieo tM P�Nn to irc.oae pun4c e�'.nMesinen henery
tl¢s�gns a�Ola^dscape—oCJ,�fnn;�n:
W NEREAS.:ne Par`ei s�[nil!¢c a'�a��epa�i ol tls actr.eies a�tl rewmnen]aeors'�o PP
MeyararrpGuyGuomicsiru�ma'.ef•e�in�mmiss�onNo ']6Y,J0)) anrll�eHCCflPqiooPian
was lo�mally pieseteJ'.c��e C��iy Canmission w•M1 Rem�W on No ]:122-]1056,anl
WNEREAS, int ADCD v�sio�i Pian empnas�ees maa�irg oedas"�a�-�oc��seu p�.�iir,
spaces, slow.rg venicula� YaB2 ar] ensv�g we�,ldesi9�e� sVeetswces Io enna^ce Ine
2MPCrBn�C I9i lQSiCCO'.i 3nd e5ib'S 0 ihE,d�0
WHEREAS, t�e Plan mtludes �emmme^Md a[]on tems Wtegw¢e� as nCa� lem�,
nedwm tem, arc�ng re�m,wmr,n�pe�ny Coien��ssKn may�myement m pnases.and
WME0.ER5, m Jvie Lz.2022.-�e cty Convnssnm wppT� ai um.ae�.arc«ur ae��esi
for puaxF aGons�AFO)I.h_2022-<35-rv0�«qrc��recw�ai Dasigr 5<rvicez�or;ne Ocevn�rne
CorMor ImqO�¢mell dnd Wmm�S Pa'�.Er.�dK.emC01 Pro�EC I Ccean Dnve P�qetl$erv.ce5 I,
aitl
WHEREPS, pe� Resdutior 2C11d'[]+^ '.�e Uv Comrwssm ailnanzee mE Cry
Mm�n_5'eb�n ro anie� nb �e9d�a•,ip�s+i'n f,3ro��. G�o�]an� 6 �ssota�ex vc �G3n"�_t+e
Tlp�ankGC O�Opree�f0�IXee�D•rve.PrLBnt$ev¢as.3�b
1957 of 2719
WXEREAS. :^ Jere E 2023. ine C ip en�erec mw a vwfesrenai Serv�ces nqxemem
w���GGn,rrre C^vA Ag�eemeni�.ana
WHEREAS. iPe Ocean Pnva Co�aeor and wmmus Park Emanfem<ni �rolea s a
omp�ea mWe-ynxr eMeaw�Na� �vubes cumD�A�bnyive^.esign.o6•mi�pny. an0,orstmcUo��
ane
WHERfAS, e �ezg� pe���tsng, a�U ��mpiemanla�.�on ol lignuny and iceuau
�mprovemems aionF`��an Diwe wncn ca -omyievkl �n a sPoner urr�efaine snnultl �a
O��onlized�o aCtl'ess mmeJale cpmm�npy M¢45 and
WHEREAS. Ocean Dme �s ar �con¢ sUeel wrt�o� :ne O'ys h�sboc drsMci a�M a�y
IiypLng and siae.valx improvemePlS will'eGwre commun��y irpc�. a5'✓el',a appro.ms Irom�ne
Mismrm wese�aauon Bw�a ;re G O 9o�n Overnqm Cnmm��tlee aaC tne Gry Commission ene
WHERE/.5, ine ritlmimstraven +ui �eM b pr=pare any �e^essan e e�dne��.� !c me
smpe ol ine CGA Agreemenl antl
WNENEAS, iM1e GP� Ccmm5z�0� rewg�nns Ne ropoharce ol �ytiinG and viMnaiF
�npi0V2M1E9�5 !1) P.OryJOLB Sd�PD/ 8' P.55�OrPf) dOd dlS�M1eO[5 3nC YCC4T 'J BOv2�C2IfQ5E
eMancemems(o�lPeDer�eldm��esi0e��s ns�tars endlora pusnesms
NO W,THEREFORE.9E IT RESOLV ED BV iNE MqYOR ANO OTY GOMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI 9EqCM,FLORIDA.Nf�Itie Mayor and Gily Comnission nareby OheClhe
Gy Ptlmmisbatlon to 4xe �ne necesxary rext seos �o �.mplement iynu�g ana siCewalk
�mprovemcm,s a5 pafl d he voler�ny0'GeeU G 0 &n�d Ocea� Onve Gq�00� �mpmvemen�
>fo�Ccl Prlbdina5ommunllyengage�'enlantl'enmreEappro�als�romlheHislJncP�eservaLon
Boarc me G 0 90��Ore�sqnt Commn'c�ana ma Gp Conmission u weu as mn yreoa�at.on
M eny racessary amendmen�.m tne wooe a��ne Pmfessoaal5enices Aqreemen�aacee Ju�e
fi 2023 Cetwee��.ne Gty ana GN�� Groraenc R Assoca�es nc
v�55EDancADOPTE0ima9' nayo'� ..d�+�'> ?OPn
♦TfEST �� ��� ,
i�' G'� ��-+�✓L_-
��J �� � �enMe�nerMayur
/
Rolerl E Gra�M;r Oty OeA
prper➢.,Gn n;-�
FCNM d IPNutI.�;:E
ISpC�30R4byCO1nI1�I55iO�Q�K051lnRO5P.nGO�ZdIEEi 6kUHFAhI:UflJry
CP>Coi.a'e:'Y C.'-� .wr laJl:C;^.nyue2
Lo.i�v,reoreEMCa�m4a�nksiro�µ4u� �� '+- .
Gy+dma ua�
2
i958 of 2719
I '41F.1
Reaa W tions-C1 AI
MIAMI BEACH
�pIMI5510M MEMOR�MOUM
�� ry��p�le�ldydd�O�mDIXSU�MlCYyCwlnhi]OI
FROnI PryA�mrroYReaao� �op�w
D�1ih JaoCerbS02i
n1LE MAASBEALhNFlOR10A �REOC�TING�THEA MINISTR/�TIONTOTMFTNE%
PARTSOP TME`40EER.FFPROVE�GO OV10EOCEAN^•DFNEEC'OFRiIH%�
R.IPRO�'EMENT PliOJECT
0.ELOMYENDATION
BPC RWNOIIMSTONY
pHALY515
LM1e atlaUetl Resolulion xas p�PPreU a� l�e mQ+esl J�me sponSor Cammsf�unei Knslen
Rrnan G���alei
FlSC4l�MVACT STAtEMENT
��p ypOCYjf]ItTf'!m RO����mat IM1e AEn�n Silaron C!O�W a�eJ lo NIa'ev IM RXaI impX!
MM�sprp�snJmGdsereaf'JaM��IhGGG tlOMOf dnDlrveCan�QIXlmprvv<�Itn1O�0[IC1
M � g px ESEmiN'l
ffCR OR�INPNCES OMLY�
•appl�caN�.�M Bu�i�wsa YnV+�t E�tim+b IBIE)r��O�IK�b^^
se�BlEa� nnv: �� m�e.aenly ����_n�. e�vklm�...nae�aa. , ,
FI IP� NFORMBl�
CONC W SION
I10 IcaOkAr�+
� �..tle
aage �ei r'a5�
1959 of 2719
�
I
s��sa"RuiEanbRq�lmKne."�bm. �•x.mnaM�wCOBwM
Pj C 1v C M S�ctl 2 T� yy�
N� vu
�W n � I RC oEOv t � n Ni M n coEe S�c zJe�
1 M I �o�l� o�br i Nc
uvo s���qineoameoiroeepcue�+�c�����p+��.�
D�vammem
Gb�no+�ev
��
comm�sa���«Kruren ame�aonzai<x
caaooroorla�
CwMww�C T�iM
�cean Ori.e Liqn�mg anC SNexai.ImOr.veinenls IRou�Gon[akz.CA
�,ge 'se o,aag;
1960 of 2719
EX�1161T B
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE PROFESSIONAL ARCH17EC7URAL
AND
ENGINEERING (fUE)SERVICES AGREEAAENT
BETWEEN 1HE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORfOA
AND
CALVIN GIORDANO AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
�ATED JUNE 6, 2023
FOR 7H£PROVISION OF ADpIT10NAL PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND
ENGINEERIN65ERVICES FOR THE �ESIGN OF THE OCEAN DRIVE CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENTS AND IUMMUS PARK ENNANCEMENT PROJECT, IN THF
AMOUNT OF 5540,907.50
This Amendment No. 1 to the qgreement is maQe and cn[ered th�s day o�
, 2025, by ar,d benveen the CIN OF MIAMI BEACH. a municipgl corporation
ezisting unAer the laws o( Ihe State o� Florida Qhe `City"), having Its pnncipal oHices at
1700 Conven[ion Cenle� DriVe, Miami Beach, Flond'a 33139, antl CALVIN GIORDANO
ANO ASSOCIATES, INC., a Floritla Corporaiion having its principal oKce at 1000 Eller
Orive, Sufte 604 FoM1 Lauderdale, Floritla 33316(ihe "ConsWfanP').
RECITALS
WNEREAS, on May 10, 2019, Ihe Ciry issued a Request for p�alifications (RFQ) for a
land use, mohiGry, and economic developmenl stutly of the Ciry's Mixetl-Use Ente„ainment
("MXE`)tlistricl, also known as the Att Oeco Cultural Discrict('ADCD"rn the "DisfrrcC);a�tl
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2022,Ciry Commission accepted the ADCD Vision Plan, in
concepf, antl
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2022, authonzed the Atlminishation b issue RFo No. 2022-
436-ND for Architectural and Design Scrv�ces !or the Ocean Drrve Coaidor Impmvements and
Lummus PaM Enhancemen! Pro�ect, as proposetl �n the ADCD V�sion Plan; antl
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2D22, the City Comm�ssion atlopted Resolut�on 2022-32340
aUthorizing the Ciry Manager to negotiate wito the top ranked proposer, CaWin, uiortlano 8
Associates. 1nc. (CGA) antl on June 6. 2023. the city eXecufed an Agreement, witM1 CGA, in Me
tot21 ampurtt o!52,720,049.70; antl
WHERE0.5, on June 9. 2023. CGA was issuetl a Notice :o Proceetl and commenced
meeting with the regulatory agencies and prior to commencing the data colledion, traffic ana�ysis
and motleling, i� was necessary for CGA and the Ciry fo o�tain conr.urrence from the regulatory
agencies;and
WHEREAS. Corcurrence from the fegulalcry ayencies on Ihe Ira�ic sludy melhodology
was obfainea from Miami-Dade Counry Departmenl of Transportation and Public Works (OTPW
in Apn120Y4 and RoriOa Depanmen� ot Transportatwn m May 2024� and
riHEREAS. ihe approved trattic sludy me�hodology resulted in additional manhours
necessary to sa4sfy �oth regulalory agencies, the collechon of tra�c data at addiUonal
intersedions, the evaluation of atletional multiple scenarios and tne preparatior of atlaitional
1961 of 2719
EXHI3 T 6
Iraffic mo0els�, and
WHEREAS, the approved traftic stutly methotlology also repuired Ihe consullant to
evaluate severel projects �mpacting ihe area of stotly that were �ol contemplated at the lime of
the execuUon agreement wifh CGA�, and
WHEREAS, on Oc'ober 30, P024, �he Cily Commissio� atlOpted Resolution 2024-3337,
directing Ihe Administralion lo�ake Ihe necessary next steps to implemenl lighting antl sidewalk
improvements as part of the Ocean Dnve Cortitlor Improvement prolecL and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, CGA has submitted a reques�lo�atlditwnal services,for
the sCope of work required to meet !he reqmrements of ihe DTPW and FD07 approvee fiaNc
sWtly methodology in the amount of $254, 485.30, antl lor add�tional des:gn services for the
implementation of IigMing and sidewalk improvemenis along the Ocean Drive Corntlor. in the
amount ef 5286,42224, for a total amoun� of 55M10,90Z54: and
WHEREAS Amendment No.i wi11 revise ihe total conhact amount to$32fi0,95724; arrcl
WHEREA3, lhe negotiate0 proposal submitled by Ihe Consultanf was reviewed and
analyzed by City staff and was found ro be fai• antl reasonable�, and
NOW. THEREFORE, the paqies hereto, and in consideralion oF the mulual promises,
covenants, agreements, terms, and condrtions herein conla�ned, and other gootl and valuable
consitleration, the respect and adequacy are hereDy acknowledged, do a9ree as tollows�
7. ABOVE REdTALS
The above rer.itals are irue and correc[ antl are incorporated as a part of this
Amendment No. 1.
2. MODIFlCATIONS
(a) The Agreement is a�nended. as provitled here�n ao0 in Schedule
"A" atlacheC hereb.
(b) In consideralicn For the services to be pedormed under this AmerWmeN
No. 1, Clry shall pay Consultant the noFto-exceM amount oi$540,907.54, as provided
in Schetlule "A", attached hereto,
(cl
3. OTHER PROVISIONS.
All other provisions of the Agreement, as amendea are anChanged and shall rema�n in
tull force and eflecl.
4. RATIFICATION.
The Ciry antl ConsultaM ralify lhc terms of [he Aqreement, as amended by [his
Amendment NO. 1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihe parties herelo have causeA ihis Amendment No t to be
executed �n iheir names by Iheir duly authorized oRicials as of the dale firsl set fotth
abo+e.
1962 of 2719
E>tiiBiT 8
ATTEST: Enc Carpentec City Manager
Rafael E Graradq Ci�y C�erk
ATTEST- CONSULTANT'
Calvin GbNano 8 Aasocutes,lnc.
Seaetary President
Prinl Name. Print Namr.
1963 ot 2719
i
� ���85�;4 Calvin. G�crdaro b Assoc�.ates Inc _� �
� -
Mnch 15,:025
_Y" "1 ='! . � Mr.pavlUGam
- . '." i��ie����,.o�+r �rlawauma�we��em v�oie�.�
. . . . .� ru, CIIyolMiam.Bea:M1
. . . •' '. ll00Canvenlloc<enier m�vr
�e MidmiOeadi,Honda33ll9
� �' PF NVI�iCDI ue'W Cxq PoulLng lmm C�engPf �iahpc E�¢nippnng ppye of N'or4 fo�
"� � 00. ��Onv_andW m�.nOPCV�if5lfo�GJJitioielLyndaloCmn �'/yenry-RUVwea
-� �- '- �� r,wn:swe�esanaro eevr��ee��ecm�recene��ameoey�ommnsm��e�aesowno�
_ .�. „ � � oea.M� ��mP�
� � � �• J AnM1e,eQues�ol:ip5ta�t.wrmepmriemyermiaiorminnmumem ong•nailv�nued�oPe
:,�ac•� � � aq un wp ta. zoza w�rcwee �:o� ,�e ree. •�� aaaiou�ai ,e�v�.es -eaue:�ea �� ry
_ . --� m����,,.� � a ne,�i��� � .ia��r �r ii.� e�..���z.�i, wr i�.�r ,ew,aiea m� �w�
� � ^ � � � �� o�aponeneonn��aoc�me��..roiww:
" � - "� � -� � Spaifictotheto�{aamlmpmvemm¢m0aeanDiivundWmmusPark.Ropeedivs
-� _. . ,. ... beCtl��+•M1.v�erf,� ��ey-rqw. enno�rrFlc��aaoe�an.Temort.e�.voru�.on
..r . IfDpl� fnd t�C Miami DeOe Cumry Deyer�men; o�T�enspo��a:ion entl 4uC4c WoeYs
, . i . . � � . ICiPWI
a F�bib(A: IyeL.mFaownla.'h��u9nvuoym�i0o�am(52ia.485-301
+ � b Rw�ed ESLIOi1 E: ep�dled ithCJule Lom whal w ongina'.ly inJuded m tFe
es
. _ . „ . o.�e��ai<onvaiuoaemess��eo�arnnwav�ea��nm.�r,orvooii�emvw.
, „ , - il SpmlrcmtLeSnontamlmp�oremmbteoaa.oiircaaaitr�nafervi�n�ea��+teo
.i �� �.,, . �a..a�. mor�a..d .oi.m.,,�.��..o�ren�,q, ��eew.i��,�a,a�.m.��,
.,_ . � _. . . . abne0cearDme
, , . [+nibi�F �eeereaxaown�oimp.non-�e,maea�;iunaiservmeai5eeoaztlai
u [+Nertfcamrt,yzRettnea��elo.meenom�ameeJ�nona�,er.za
I. S14bFlC TO THf LplGifRM IMP110VEMENi51OIXFqN OflIVE iN0 W MMI15 P�pN�.
' we a�e neie�y nw�ry�rg�n�cnv��a ariay�.o ae oro�ett s:nedwe. a.�a w..�e s�amnc�q u�,
.. „� , ... . e.ma�ano� or. m.�q� m�e o� wo.� m� �o�r . .�d xnm !w ..mmen,,..i am
�^e�^•�•,^e.F,�;«:ro�m�o..r.,�o,��.o���wm�.�:rohc.oru . „oea�oe.oa�ar»as.
, -�.. .. aoLoday'sOTe,re:mt� �� olleem p153iE,d8530. %ea �otet�at!M1n�mpeo'
ork rcflects repu'ement�in<IuCed in LrV'IeaOp�oaeG inflh]Eoloqie�lom'elly�pV�wetl Ey t�e
4ypn s i�v�ng luh�[Im� �4M1� tM1¢ 9araa Depa� enl ol iymporta��m��f�pi� anC m
+�v:qnaiyemmm Myr^"Ur.lrtpun�vDrpzrtme+lo�Gdnipo��a�lananuPu6¢M'orlsi�IPW� l�rcmportanl�o
1964 of 2719
EA<'BIT j
.U4._ ..e]fi3 Mx[+15.E@5
°^6EEof'S
note that dela�s to[his'van 1'of the mnraR nav impac�futere mmpanen�g olMe mnt�act,
u those coul�oe tlepentlent on the suaessful comO�eLon oY Gart 1'.
ORIGINRL CONtRqR BACKGROUN�
A1 the tim¢ o� develwing Ihe ssoDe o( work For the prolecl anE during our mitial smu�ng
mee�ing.in Demmber 102]antl ianoary 3023,CGA rdvised Ihe Clry�na�a smping meeung wi[h
bolh Miami-pade Counlys Department of Transpoeatio� and Fublic Works �DTPWI and Ne
flarida Department o(Tramportanon (FDO"li wauld be essential m ascenain what pmcesses,
pmcedu�es, and stantlartls theV w'oula apply to the rea�lretl [raff�c evalua[ion met�oAolo¢y
necessary ro secure a pern t w�ih bo[n dgmcies. Tha[advlsement was made in atler m derive
evactly what smpe ol work wauld be essea[lal to mee[!Fe reQuirements of�he agencie5 The
Gry directed CGA ro�ot mnducc a preliminary meeting with�he agenaes antl miteao Cevelop a
scope of work, basetl on ussumptons CGF woold make, wRh [he dGecOve [haq oMe Ue
mOr�inaVon pmcess mmmen�eC W2h Ine agencies,�<<hanges in Ne scope were nPedetl Ihtn
tney would be atldressed at that ome and any necessary :hanges to the mntract would be
presentedto Comm ssion forTpo•oval.
Followmg rewipt ol the No•.ice to Fmceed Ol(NTP-01�, CGA drafietl a mechodo�ugy `or traff��
study antl evaluation, based on �heassumpfiors ihal were made el the Yme o�develop�ng the
smpe o�work. The initial mord�natmn mee[ing with�Ae agen�ies occmred in Audm�2023,and
thp team has met w�[h bo�h Oioy�ard�OOT SIaH on xeveral occas�nre m review(hei�mmments
ro the vatious 1lerations o�Ne me[hodology,�o ga[hei feedback and �urther camm¢nt,and to
seeN conse�sus eetween tne twc agenoes.
Appmvols were receiveJ as/oNows:
• May i].20I4- Approvalon methodaloqy received fro�n POOT
• �Ady]�. �0]d-FDpT-appravedmethudologYsubmlttedroDTGW�o'wncvrtenry
• lone2G. dOld-AOFrovalonmethodology�ecenedlmmDTPW
The curren[,approved methodolog/for swEY. res��ting from the di�eclives obta�ned trom the
aRenciez tlu��ng the coordhatior mee2ings, has suhstannalry changetl Irom che �rvtial
assump[ioes that were arade at the t�me of�raking[he o��ginal smpe ol wark.
IMPACfS TO'PpqT I-TIiAfFlC STVOIES'
In summary. �hose mOtlification5 10 the Tmffit Enginee'ing methCOology whlcn impact the srope of wnrk
ncfutle�.
• Aninveazeo�96-�ourAverageOaihT�aHic(ADTs�datacoliecnonandeoaluation
• Aomcreaseuf6�hourtumingMovementCoun6liM�s�da[acopec0onardevaluatiuratmtrrSeRions
tl�nng[pe weekdaw a�tl weekends
• The addi�ion �f segmenc s0eed rollectio�s
� ihe aEtlitor ef scenario,m bf evaluaceC wFen derermiring Ne 'ex�s�ind m�divo�s' m�se'�Ine, wht�e
DCP W a�d FOOT d�iNer I n their legal posRiooing on what Is lo be determi netl as'exisbng conErtio�s'
• The addilion of�xe�u�io analysis t�at solely eva�uates the modif'�catmn ol lrafflc patlems on all east-
WBSI 5[f2BI512ddVIR(fORI(.O��If15 4V2^l+¢l0 UWdO��rv21�t0 O�P-Wdy CO�p�215 t0 i50�d[C[fE impdR 0�
onP-wayinjlhe5e I��Pet SPtmpn6.wllld�ar2 requlrpC IorOp[i�PS 2 and 31n I�PA�C�Pldn
;965 of 2�19
EX�,131i y
<SA 01 l3 6363� Mrc�l5.lOdS
nap iu115
• Adfreeretl thih in[Yre me[vodology bav� �'om "vavcl forecnsting moEek"lo a hybrid model wrth Ma
pofential b�induEing"Dynamic iralfic Assigament(DTA)moEels,"as specilically�eocested by FDOT
n Travelforecastingmodelsrep�esent[hes[aticregional;ravelanalysiscapabil�ry,wnereasDTA's
miuos<opic t'affic 5imulati0� moEels a�e saperior for rpgional �piamlc corritlor�evPl VavPl
anaNsis. OTA models f�ll m �he gap ov e^abling dynamlc [raffic co be modeied at a range of
scafei rnat hghllgMs impao[s[o lhe regmnal area
e ThethangeloDTAmodelbuedaralysescameasare��Hofffiemnfluenccofseveralpro�ecL
antl ini[ialivPs which will impacl the study area withln wF.ich Ocean Onye sits, which rhe
agenr,es rrqurte m be lacroretl-In antl retle;trd In che smdy.includingthe following IisP.
• The c�rtenl'�emporary'permillcd mndlbuns of Ocean Orive
• rhe :urrenfun0�rmitteamc4itionSo�tFeOceanD�ire"pmmenade'
• The Oending permit request �y Ihe City to t�e '.ounry for t�e dosure ol Espanola Way
oetween W lsh.•ngtOn Averue and Collins Aven�e
• The s�bmisSion to tPe ".ounry for an evdluatior on a proposal to Oedcs[rianize Ihe
segment ol Lmro'n 0.aad edst ol Washmgton A�enue.
• Coonrypla�sfora(orthwmingBusPapidrransi[(BftT)inhas[�uiNreimpmvementon
Washin¢ron Pvenue
�Pkase no[elbat Ihp agennes'mn�Pms�ip at Ihe confluenoe of how[he sum oi these projects
w�ll impzct ira�f¢ Oa[tems and dlvernon [hroughaut [he context when compoundetl by the
s�ggested charges to Ocean �nve, somemplaled in:he 3 41Herent scenarios being evaluaWe.
. It Is ImOonant ta note that if the Ciry makes any atlditianal reQuesK for new permfts far any
addftional road tlosures or tra�c modifications during our stutly-period and which are not
atready cwrtemplated In tAis sbadysme�haEalvgy, !he agencies may reject the resulb of any
findings antl may requlre tbat any atlditlo�al requested projecb Ee added [o the ovenll
evaluatlon at ihe time ot cancidering fie issuance af any permits,requiring the study to be
amended acoordinpy.�
POTFN7IAL IMP0.[TS fROM fUTORE ANCILLAAY iROlECiS
• Due[oan "urpermltted'StdtuSofthe0ceanDnve"Pmmenade."�TPWhaShcvertetlf�omFDOTIn[he
dete�mination of x�ha! is to be considtred "evisting mnd�Lons" Des�ite the fac[ that Me mrrent
m�figuration o�Ihe overall �onfigunt'�o� of Orean Driv¢ (one-way southbound with dedicatetl bike
fanes�re e�ved a permi�antl which M1as Geen m-place�ollowing COVIq Mp W has taken t�e ztance Ihal
tFe "e.�s�ing:onElHons"m be usetl when modeling'he bazehne(or the pruject shall be Ihe conddmns
that e.isted pre-COVID OiPW has directetl as to �tilize p'e-�OVID :onditlons antl Oroject �hem to
cwrent Oate.
• An mcrease'm the evaluatioo!ime antl eHor[to pertorm!he�e0mre0 OT4 andlyzes. ThK necesvtates
a helghteneG level af analys s,increased pmcessing ume,mo.e mmprehem�vc dezcr�F<ions,e.�Pna'ivc
Aommemation,additionar�vhthfcs anda5ubstamia(organixationaleHon_Onaveraye, the�umberol
houn allocated per pmlcssional has abstantially �;ncreased,prlmarily due io thr. escalatetl mmpleYity
o/the p+o�ect,the Increasetl tliligmce required tor documenn ng and evalualing Ihe tlata,and Ihe inore
exiensrve processes required fo�the analyss. Add�eonally,e�e reQuired technical, speualry ex0ertrse
of che staff requ��.ed ro mntlua the directed an+lyses haz �een inneazed acco�dingiy
• II is important ro no:e that t�is mcr^a5e i� s<ODe als0 has impaces on !he degrees and levels O(
coortlina[bn needatl among the as•igned leam members and the agenciea,antl ac sw:p also Inrreazetl
Ihe pro:ec[ manag<ment needs to ensure yualiry, mne�steniy, a�d :anp�ianae with the agen�ies'
requirements,mcluding several coorAination meetings wi[h;4e agencles.
1966 of D19
ea-rnil y
es•m �zbasv-M.-�xzsxoxs
�e�n,r a
WONK PEflFORMEDTO�DpTE
W e continue m ativa nce[Fe pro�ec[as much as wc ean,maki�R e�ery aKem p[!o mini�rxe Ihe�mpacts��a�the
change�m�he new meeh�dologl'will ha'ee o���e wn[rac[ed sc�etlule
• OataCollectioreBesidesthemanymordinationandworNing�sessmnmeeti.�gswehavehadwit�U1PW
antl FD�T, we h�vr completed Ihe cellection of traflic tlata Ihat bo[h OiPW ana FOOT agreed upon
nduding vehmulaq pedestrian and cyd-�st Aata. That tla[a was collecteA at the�ollowing iocations:
• WasMng�onAvenue,between9"anE:O" Svice[
• CollinSAvewe,between9'"and10lh5Peet
- Ocean Or ve. between 3M anJ 10:h SPeet
• Wa>h�ng[on Avenue,between 14`"Slreet and EcpaTWa Way
- C011insAvenue,be[ween 14"5�reet antl ld"Place
• Ocea� Orive,petween 14'"S[ree�and 14' Gla<e
• Inter-OeD+rtmental5takehdderMeetin`s: TheCGAtlesign�eamhazmetwrtheverymnuib�tingCrtv
departmm� s[akeholtlers to ':ntroauc= �hem ro[he pmject,tliscuss Ihe parameters o�Ihe smpe, and
soiic� Oata relate0 ro [he design of Ocean O�ive and Wmmus Par.. This initiai inrer-DepaKment
coo�tlina[ion will�onunue antl be key[o ensuring a w¢essful pra�ea. The departmenl5 with whom we
me[,wah thP avenighf o�Op.��ndutle'.
• CWrvre and To�irism
• Fm�am�rt Oe.elapment
• EnvrtunmentandSuslenab1111y
• Faciline�
• Fire
� Greer Spa<e
• Pa�Mirg
• Pa�ksand Re<reatlon
• Pldnning
� Folire
' PUbIIc WOrki
• l�/bdlt FORStry
• lar6¢evmt Logistics ObservaHon: In responu ro the im0onance Wm.res Pa�k play; m large eaer[
plannmg antl �ns �muact a� an econoTfi�eneremr for 1hr C�ry, UP and CGA AaH met wrth vanous
departmencs dunng the se:-up al[he 41r and Sea Show and Ne Pood an0 Wine fes[iva'�.where Civ and
fGA StaN w able m observe anJ wdentand tM1e va�iou� logiz[io and reeds pf O�QDdring for a�d
pbrnmgfo e�enKoftha�aale. ihisislmporta�<duetnthefac�thato�Pott�epeAormabveme�ncs
(pr a well-Qevgn Lammus Gark �nd�Eps[he fle�lbilily needed to�large-sale engagements.
• Topog�aphical Survey: We have hnalieed Ne topograph¢s�rvey o!�he pro�ect sim antl are nurently
mordma�io5� and schedulmg Communily s�akeholder meetinkSln mmmer:e Ihe pu0lic engagement
mmponent o� the pmject wrth 'fislening sessons' tha[ wili serve as a basa �or (uwre design and
autteach eRorts.
1967 of D19
Ek—iBii g
95A91 d[b363 M�'.�6.�OR
a,e..;.r iY
SUMMGFY Of pMICIpATED IMPARS
I. �,io ro Ne motlificanon of[he methodology,as dlretted by DTPW and f00i,the Oro)ect schedWe w�Jl
be tle'ayetl. The orieinal milesmne was m make a presentaGon of lindings and remmmendations to
Ciry Commissio�in April of 203<Por selettian of a madway mnfieuration for Ocean Urive. That was
based on a xhedule�hat had a methotlology apprwed Ey eady September I023. The curren�delay
has pusheC tAa[mileimne b y a nale W menths to possibly earty Gall 2015.
II. SPECIFICTOTHE$HOPTdERMIMCROVEMFNTSTOOCEANDflIVE:
ihe City has requested t�at Ihis smpe be revlseE fo add Ilghting and sldewalY impmvemen[s to enFance salery,
a[cessibillly,and aesthetcs along Oman Drive,"which can be mmpletetl in a shorter timeframe,"' compered
to the Ocean Orive and Lvmmus Park Enhancement Pmje�t which "is a multi�yea� endeavor ;hat imolvetl
comprehens��e deslgn, permltting an0 mnsvuc[ion" ` The goal for Ue pmle�t�is m "Implemert the f��h:�rg
and sitl¢walk improvenen6 as pan af the vocer-appmvetl G.O. 9ontl Ocean prive Corridor Improvement
PIO{PCL" '
'ltem O AI, Ci1y of Miam�Beath Commrssivn Aqendo. dated OCICEe�30,1024
Our untlers[anding of ihe reQuest Is m p.epa re aesign oDnons and implementation strategies for inp�ovenen¢
t�al ca� be implemented in the shurt rerm. The request from thr. City rs tha[ ffiart�term �mpmvements be
aezigned In a manne�m[hey can De vansi�ioned �inro[he long4rm plans IorO[ean Dnve antl Lummus Park
Gene�ally,the most effective manner te achieve[hl�in m flrs[arrioe at a long-term des�g^antl determine wFe�e
all the atical I�fraStruc[ure neetls to be loca[eQ then reverse engineer a short-rerm �mplementacion
mmponert pah�calarly because Me changes bemg suggex�ed in fie ADCD Plan a�e a large departure From the
enlstlrgcundluons�mpac�ing roadway :onLgurations,sdewalk w�dtM1s.�he location o�tlrainage infrastmcture,
lighnng Inlrasnucmre, parking, lendscaping antl iniga[wn. Mod.tying the eelsling mn7rtions for a shvrtterm
impmvemen[t�al wtll fhen be reVO�fitted m a luW re mn�IguraUon will not Vanslale 100%from IM1e short�to
long-term phase;�here wlll be:omponents tha[will�vork for the sFort-�erm phase and will reQuire�o be undone
or•rconFduredfortheluturpohasC,tlependingor,��vdeRreeaf�hangezbeingo«Oosed. Weremgn�ze;�at
[hismayhavealnancialimpaUonthevansitonbetweenphases. Wew111makeeverycttortlominimire[hese
condinons and take tha shorD [o -Ong-Ierm Ohasing shategy Into mrvtle•ation when evaluating antl makmg
aesign recommentlat'ions.
To achieve[his,t�is proposal acknowledges that red�cing i mpacts m inlrastructure ehat can either balloon the
bodget or exarerbate the schedule will be an essent al tomponent to the pio�ec!'s sutcess and will Ro a lo�g
way to znmre that[he prolect Is implememable. AddiUonally,design deosions shoaltl re4e�t known i�mftanons
thatpermltagenoeswlllimoosc. Theselimrtatio�ssnoultllncluae.
1. Ensuring that the evis[in{ tlrainage paRems of t�e roadway rpmain uncha�ed. Tnis will elimina[e
pmlorgen nmes associatrE witF design anC permiaing and ellminate costiy o08rades!o�Fa eusmng
drainage infrazvocture. Th:s wAI resdt in the rxoling catch basins ana curb-and-gutlers lo �emain in
them�urre�t Ixation without moClflcation.
3. Ensuria`tfirttheenisting.aadwayhsffiaconf5umtiondoesrrotchanpeframtliecunmtconsitlons,
including the mnmt pavemm[ marking and zhiping_ �hr cunem permkted ron]ition is a 1-way
sou[hboundhavellarewithieparatedbidl�e:lro�ial6ikelares ihlswtlleliminatetherequirementYor
exfrnsive fraNic lore<asHng s!udies that req�rirp to[s ol time br s:enarm-building and haHic �m0att
mode�bng in order to secure a Qermit thro�gh Niami Dadc County's Depariment of Transportatio�a�d
Vubl¢Workc. These smAios and evaWations a re curr¢rlly bemg uo0ertaken as a part o��he base Occan
Drive and Wmmus Park Enhancement Vro�ecC Acditiona!ly,we wan�to avob tr�ggeung any �equre�f
mwews bv Miami Da�e CountV s�epanmcnt nl TransOo��r�inn anA Dub rc Works for madifications or
changes to Ihe pavemeN markings ard signage.
1968 of 2719
—f3i� 3
9i�Gl 13 6EQ-Ma-<p;5.1035
Poge6c�IS
3 E�rsuring lhat all¢Nisting utilities remain unchan6etl. ihu will eliminate p�olongetl times associatetl
with peAorming ufliry mordlndtian efforts with �tiliry mmpaniez and mztly effo¢ [o mntlify tpe
baatwn al E.�sn�g utilrtres
Ensurin6 tl�at any liehting imomvemenls located an �he west siAc o/Ocean Drive are castinp illumina�ion
away hom[h!shorellne,utlliee lurtledrkndly amber II{h[Ing,aod are sAieldedto prevml IIQAt splll�owarAs
the shoreli�e 'h¢will e•.Imina�e known pain-points with tfie FlonQa frsh antl W tldli(e's reshictiuns on ig�[mg
t�at nay Impac[tuMe nesPng�aDitat areas. If is�mporta�t m irofe thM ANY lighnng improveaent will ieqwrr
a pe�m�f fmm FWC Nrough the Sta:e's CCQ Permit proress,wh�¢h al a minimum takes fi-N months ro o�tain a
permic Not dfsigning!n coniormance wiffi the rtsviaions put in ulace by FW C may have�he Impact ol haltlng
[fie pro;ett from pmceeding. R iz critical m untle�stand t�a� per the reouiremen[s of FWC. 1he resullant
illum�naPon levels will beof� ower InlPnsity and may I�erebre neetl aACilianal Ggh�iag Gx[ures/s[ra[egies[o
obta��� higher levcls oF Aluminatwn,rf so required by fhe City.
G�ven the above parameters. we recommPoOlhat Ihe en8lnee�i�g and even�ual implemen�a�ion of the shurt-
�erm improvementz be do�e in[wo parallel;racks.
• ird�k 1 shoultl focu5 or sltlewalk repiacemenC eeCurively. These improvements can be perm¢ted
through Ihe City's Puhlic Works Departmen[via a RIgIriO4 Way Oermrt antl It allows the City fo be i��
control of the tlmellne lo expetlite reviews and obtaining[�¢ p¢rmiL This scope is drafted wrth t�e
underatanding c�a[a Stace issued CCCL permlt is required. bowever becausr�he smpe is only sidewal k
replacemenr we dori t antitlpate much mare eHort Nan an inival standard rpview�y che agency,
• Track2shoultlfnason[heLghti�g�mprovements. ThrseimprovemenlsaresubjecltcS�ateoe�mrtnng
pmcesaesantlarzcntbeirownprolongedtimellne. SeparatingtheimplcmentaUono`thelighnngwill
all�wthevdewalkreplarement�onutbe�elayeabythe5ta�e'sreQuiredappmvalo'[hel�gh[ing. ihis
vack SYould only truiy impact the selectbn of fixmres antl lamp5lbulbs�—co�dei[s, pulLbores, wrnn�
and ol�er needed Necvical inlrasimcmre<an all be installed as a patt of ihe sitlewalk improvements in
irad 1
SpecH c ExduSions lo[his'Shortterm'PmjPct
• ModJications[oanyu�dergroundutiityoiservice
• all mordination arC pernimng with any uLAtv or sernce agency ehut has infrasnuawe wnNn the
Ocean Drrc Righto'-Way
• Geote<hn¢al fnqm r�ng De��gn Serwces
• S�bzurfaw Ubliry Ezplorabon(SUE) sern<es. Th15 Oroposal Is draketl wah the azsumpbon that there
are np uNiry(onllios lha�will impact Ihis"SnorCterm pmle;Y'
• Dralnage Uesign
• flWdwayDeSig�anaTraHictrgineering0esign5ervices
• tand5[apindandirnga[io�DesignSenices
• AllService50uringb�ddv�garmnstmcnon
Speolic Task Elements to include.
TASM 1—DATq CO«FRION.EVA WATION,309L CONCEPiUAI PIAN,GUBLIC OUTNEACH,dnd HVB APPROVAL
• Artend kick-ott meet nS wit'�Crty staH ana�m[ernal stalf rn confirm pmjec�goals and schedule.
• Review anV avalable �erord Erawmgs, onf.ty atlases, the [opog�aph�c ard �oadwaY suryey, and the
flnJings Lom any rzatl4y-avadaole uliliry inlormatmn tumished by the Gty, cau0ie0 wl�h op-si�e
observations to iden:�ry polential conlllcts m aaoid in che shon-term Imqovements.
]969 of 2719
Fx..iSir 3
45a h-E1.6]fi)_M.�vn;'..:0)5
c�Rr n�..
• Cevelpppreliminarymna�D��alA�anslordesig�app�oachesandsVaregipsforsho�t-te�mim0�orvmrm
optians lo be vened py[ne Ciry.
• Attentl u0 to 6 design mordina:ion mcetings with various Ciry DeOartments �o �dentity impacts and
conff�ts with che proposetl des�gns and to sollot technica' �eed�ad and tommen¢for motliFtations
to Ihe ]esign. TM1e �ocus of Ihese meetings will be m find �olu[iocs that do not Vigger expeaslve
modifi�a[�ans io existing mirestrvcwre and mcreate their aCJiry to be�m0�emenred.
• Developconceptualtlesign apOroach.
• O�ce �he mncept is aFProved by Ci[y S[aff, CG4 Shall Orepa�e a presentation antl Ihe pre0aration o(
necessary graph¢s to mnvey the impmvements, (or use in the >ubli<ooneach procrss.
• Alfentluplo6meelingstoa�riveataselec[ion`orapre(erredoption. Thesemeetirgsareassumedto
be presen[ation meetings to Ory Commiss�oq L.[Y�ammissio�Commi�tees,Stakeholders,and In[erest
Groups The goai wql be eo sollcd feetlback{mm the publ�c,stakeho.ders and electetl ofllcials on�he�ir
pre�e�enres and convems/or each opnnn,
o No[ethat[hCzemeet�ngsare�o[EeingscopedaspubllccharrettesorhalfdaVo�alLdaydesidn
worksho0s.
• On¢a dvecCan rs approvetl iro-n Commrssion,CGA wlll proceetl m advan<e:he mncepmal tlesign m
a Schematic�30Y�� �lans level.
c orepare schemahc plans z�owing ihe pmposed im0�ovements, based On antl tliscuss�ons with
Clty StaR Subm�t[�e schematii plans r�sta(f br evaluatior dntl feedback. This plan will be a
30%level plar and will not indutle detaded engineering tlezlgn yet.
o Re9nechedes�g�optionsandob[ainz�gnoffsfromlhevariousnrtir.aldepartmenKmtheCity,
mnFlrming ihae Ney Yave�eviewed Ihe dPsigns d�d remmmentl thelr potential convtleration.
At a minunuR�,thCSP ShOU�tl iOCNtlQ Trd(hC Pubf c Works, Fa[ilitV¢S,PIDOOff1g,$b5Cd103bl1i(y [IIP
GoGre�e9artment.t0e Fre Department antl C�P.
• Uotlate sthematic pla�s based cn Ciry Staff direRives, �ullowinE public comments, anG wbmit m tM1e
Ciry staH br review
• Once reviewed by City S�aH,CGA will prepare all necessary Aesigti docoments 10 advance for rpv ew by
Ihe Hisrori[PreSeNatiOn tloalc �HVy),
• Historit�resprvation Board Approval
o vreParatinn ot applicaban pa[kage(or<he Nrstwi�Presrrva[ion Boa.d.
o Anendancemupeo3HismriaC.cscrvanorBoartlmeetings
• CGA shall not pmcredto 60%pqns/m�shuctian eocwnm[5 umJ tFe Clry has provitled m�flrmation,
in wnUng,approm�g ebe m�iceoWal tlesign
TpSK Z—60%CONST0.URION PUlNS PREPqRATiON
• Ativance a�v des�gn ;ons�dera���ons m ��ndude req�nements set in placn as a cond�ition ol approaal by
[heHismriiPreserva0on3uard Pmvlded��atanyreqm enp��mposeCbyNP9aiewul�m�neempe
ol work of this pwject, t�ose repuirements will be incl�aetl as oart of this �onlrait. Where the
requrtements ex�end beVond he smpe of Ho�k of this wrtroct, an AdGiuonal Servres Agreemert wiil
be repuired pnor to commena ng those eNortz,
• P'epare 60%consrcuction p�ans, Includ�ng�.
_ CoverandGeaeralnotes
c oemo�¢lon a�ans
c SidewalkSiteVlans
: SpecialtyPaving�lans
o Site Consttuctlon Data�Js
c SWPPPIans
1970 ot 2719
FF' N.T�
� AS>LI EE.4dGi-Ma.:�8.2pE5
r�e•ean:
_. PavingandGrad��ngFlam
_ trghbng Pho[ometncs Flan
o Elcebicai;lgbtingLayou[Glan
c Electrical Riserand Details.
• PrpG�ra 609; Icvc�cpstestlmat2.
• Conducl qA/QC nf the EO%D�ans.
• Supmit60%planstoUeOlyOepartrrentSfOrreview
• Atte�tlone(1�a11-daycomrt�ent-esa(vbon'open-house' to�evrewcwnmer(SW�+'�detlbythpvmious
Gty departments. In order ro e+ye0�le resolutioa frcm mnFllttmg mmments/drtec�ives, this all-day
'open-hause' wJl allow Ne team (o have [argeted conversatipns [a fird resoWtluns lo mnlLcting
dlre�tives rece��ed from tliHereno departments. The evpe�tanon is that 2�weeks prmr[o the scheC�letl
'opemhouse'all Gty DeO�rtment mmmenls antl feedback are fu�nishctl m CGA fo� evofuation, as we
need tc aaese whm ai�i:al reso�utio�s are needed anE who to�rhedule lor a t�me-certain resolonon
mee[mg.
• ➢repa�e a mmn¢nt resAonse package.
� Modlfytfie6094DIans�oadtlressallmmmenl5recevedandMeresolutmntlirectives.
TASN 3-AGENCY PFRMITfING
• Submitpermits[a'.
c FOfP for a CCCL Permrr
o GWCforaCCQLlghtingPermq.
• Mee[with agen�ies ro ensure all reqwred dxumen6 are pmvitletl as npeded to ob[ain linal approval
ol thp LV¢rdll pldn5
TASN<-90%FlANS PPEFARATION
• Preparc 90 o mnzrcett�an plan:.
• Prepd�e 90X-level cost estima[e-
• 7repare90%-Ieve�Wchnicalspecificanom(MeGtyshailher¢spons�.blelarallfrontendtlocvmen[sl
� [onduct(7�/QCofine9B%olans
• Submit90%plansmtheCicy�epanmentsfoire�iew.
• At[e�dune�l�hali-�7av:ommentresolu:�on'�pemhuwe'mreaiewcuninien[sp�uvided4ytheaaiious
Oty departnena. ihe erpec[allon B fha[ 2weeks prior m ;he scnvdeletl 'open-house' all Gty
Oepartmen[commenrs and leedback mc Wrnished fo CGA for ovaluation, as we reetl lo at�ess what
ViG[al�PSOIp[i0ns a�e Oeetletl and wh0[0 5<FedIIP fof a 6me-certdii letOlUlion mee'ing
• �repareammmen[responsepa�kage.
- moaifv�he 90x plens ro add��ss all mmme�ts mcerved and Ne resdution dlrectives a�d preUare t�e
Oackage(or permrtting.
7.QSN 5-CITY-0EVARTTAENT GERMITIING
• Submrtpo-masm�.
c CiryotM�amiBeachRigho-ot-WavpermL
• Submit to Gry aF Miaml Beach's Obdeing DepaRmen!for a dry-run reciea (NOte -[ne :Oniractor wiil
maka the offina� subm�tlal to tne BuiIW ng Oeoatmenc�
T451(b-FINAI VLANS ANO BID pOCUMENTS
• Make necessary mod�fi�anons m tne p.ans to atltl�ess camments Irom tne Rignc.of�Way Ferm�t and
"Dry-pun'permit D�oce;z
]971 of 7719
I %�uql' i
}SPCI�:16]fi)-MprcO li )0]i
Ga6e oo�.3
• P�epdreammmenvesponsepackage.
• Flnalnethc100%mnsVyctionplaos_
• Finalieethet00°h-levelcoz:estimate.
• Finalize �he 100%�leve� technical specfi�ations �the [iry shall be res0o�sible (o� all front-end
documems�
• coneuci RNQc o1 me loo�6 v+am
• SuOmit[he 1C0%pa[kage to the City for use dunng BiAd�ng.
TASI(]-PROIECT MANRGEMENT
• Prolec[&C rent Manapement-Design team coorQinanon during the denign ana permlUing pmcess m
ensare Ihe prolect p'ogreszes on schedule. Inis inci�des in�emal progrrss meetings,mordinafion wilh
[he [eam, roordination w2h adjacenl projects and deve�opment, answering/providing informalion
�Pquests (/wn the Ciry m interested stakeholders, uhedule upoa�es, Eudge� ronVol antl invoicC
proressng, atltlressmg dien[ mmme��z, meetinR miwtes, a�d suOPort�ng docunentation for tlesign
and permltting. Overall dlent coor0ina:ion to keep the City aware of�he p�o�ec['s progress, 6udget,
schedule,antl cricical Eesign dec'uionz dur�ng ehe mnstmction Oocume�l prepara[ion pmress
• Quality Assurance/Quality Connoi - peview ol[he mnvact tlocumen[5 Orior t0 each phave vubmittal
through mtema!disciplinary�eviews,cross-cheteing,mnslrac�abiL'ty�evlew, ai well an In-huuse review
by a professional nat drectly mvoHed with tne orojecL Note-The feez fo��his service are induded in
each iask when t�e pAjQC activrty woulA ocmr
ASSUMVTIONS
T�e only servn�es�nduded rn LM1rs mntra[t are fho5e specitrcally iUenPi�etl a0ove. The�ollowing arn atltlitional
ass�mptions f�r t���s mn[raci.mdusive ol and beyond those stateC elsewhece n this document�.
• a[tentlancr[0 1he�tlentified pabllc meeangs are includad. Attendance at addltloral meeungs car be
bllled acthe mnVacMd M1omly ra[es
� Permitapplicationanareaiewlee55hallbeNe�esporsbihryofth¢Clry.Anya�tlrtionalpermi�reqdiretl
but not 50e<ificalN�s[eE o�ob[ained by C6A are lo be ihP respons btlity oi thr awartletl Con[racror.
� Por schedme assumpGons,Ory shal' pmvitle C6F wi[h submittal review romments within flHeen p5)
worbng Oays o1 rere�mng Mem.
• In order m meee the xhetlule,the assumption is tFat Gry Sfaff will make reasvnabie efforts to make
Memselves avatlab�e for any repuired meet�ngs.
• Engineemg o� Imp�ovenen6 within �he RighLof�Way are bazec on tbe azsumptlon �hat the only
improvemen[s neede0 br the ioadway�s milling and resuda�ing the eaiseing a5phalt areas antl thal aA
roaAway sub-ba<e are structurally¢cund ar�d are not m nPed ier repay.
� nllwahizassumetltobeliniteEroa�dcon�ainedwithlnlheOceanDriverighCoi-way. Thrssmpedoes
not indude dnY Impacis to the [urb�ddii d[�M1e mterse�tions of O<ean Orive wLLh ime�secling s�ree6
and it does �ot incluCe moditica[��ons m the exiseng croswalk loca2ions in the north-motn tlirecBon
locatetl on the west sitle of Ocean Dnve.
• The smpe is based an Me assump(ron tha: <he evisting drainage ov Ocean Unve rs tunchonal a�0
>u�bnent
1972 of 2719
aausionslsuertaronoonioxn�f[esl aa �i.,e: -=���.aa��..�,�..��s..�-.�,:.�.�� . ��.
. . .. e_ _ r.VP r.ie...,.�IM1OP^Oma .�
oeWJ 8 . � ' . "�� "�
1 _ � I f . n 0. 11 � tl8r� Ys� 1 . I �i � nil. p
� � . - 3�o e � �nL tcM+�d . �o� att C n . . le0�q
- �lal¢ne�o�nPe]ec•vfllpnlo'tli]ena'E�.�aSP�crCv�IJ.�qqRuutn'e--e 1'ul�.���
_ �[dl:ulei�u^��.o'�Nse�lOo�sbgvf
l0"slfv:lmc Q�tlrtY1(Ontmi.��OCO�om
po , es6naer� -r6o-�rzons'cro�(wr �.
OP.. 4 6 . V � 0 ...� � f �.;
- . ., . .r__ � � ac.M� m.�• Fm. l v �g.a��m, n � xc . . ..
nr t e. ,
s , . , , a . �_., . r . .,r e�� � . . .:e.� �
,. ,x �i i� �,
j .. . . , ,. � rtr,.�� i , i_._xn e . z�.oy� _
, �� : r .�� . . � �
�J n .. . . � .a _. .. al lu .ai �. .ao� Y Y ..tuteJ �Ov � • 'NI 9..
�i.�.. v . . �o�� . .. . N.aV4 . I mrHr��m . er�0.ne �i.
1 � u. � t�l'..
] d ' a 1 f . . V." '1 `
l] H , o J. ,i t 1� - LL_YI � G�5 i�.....U. � a.�_ana e-..Y e • . . -c ..�
ie ,. ,n ca,a.�.y�r,_.�. .. ,�a�. , icn�na, � ,.�. � � ..�..
_ . , � ra�.�. c . ., _ .i�m .. �...��.a. i .F.i ..�saoo o�..;�,
. u ... i •icgiLi�.rn i. inlnJ[eWlu��•y
.' .n'�:u�y�n ���xn
i . ,,. :ar�no, o .� .
c
�.. , .,.� �v�
h ��, e x '
,.:�mn �.,�A:�... . o s!...- ,,,, ,�� . ,-n -r.-.e+
C f 6 .I a � . ._
. . r. r. n. xr•n��.,�oir.e�m��n�o, o �i � . . �„���., c _�oEo. ,,.���
.mi�_ � ,� 'rrr .i.e .. ���� _ �.em
MEFiiNG 1RfNDPH[F ,v i c.'n., .. . .��..ii
Du.„qzollc.l�. . . .,. .
...a�. e•,.n .�.�..�.i.F .r.,�..
.p.� .a . i:r�A ...)anx9d�vn'tee
�JneV'o.
W iG 5�a Pe9artl�.
/.%���
Ilna.�51..'�Om�e'�?
1973 af 2719
r. rr��� u
.�,� n,,.i- ....i�:er.
E%NIBIi I�-VPOPCSf D f EE BNEPKOOWN
(SVECIHC i0 TME IONGTENM IMPROVEMEMS TO OCFAN ORNE 4N0 W MMUS IAPIQ
iatalRJdtianals.nKnleec $I56,C85.30
T�rsM Descnp�ion �ddltiandiresRequiretlbComple�e
iMk1A-Ol Coor��natimwifM1lgp��x� 530d)9W
O��g��mO�baR 566,S3z0(
� v.wo+eJ� 59!N160G
iak:A-�2 oeuCol4.uon 5<82I130
0 oegiwlton[rac� 54,3000a
�. VrwOve�'. $IIX19I130
1azklnW kcw�m[+o�uanan 5����4���
n O��glnal Co�¢�act 536)ll[I.DO
o Pmpasetl Y35]FAIXI
IazklA04 PrvoriP'epannon i60,1WOG
� prigl�alConKact 551,]BC.W
o P�owue. 51zz,3B0.0a
R¢imbunatles $d1,]i000
� Therc s 5s0�Lry��m IOOT mry f¢qm e_J����nd�v�em c io/li�Pnalyse n tlie dala[�d M10
pttn<olle[[e0:o Praluate![onllrn O�ihraGor a�tM1e Ea�e enE lindlegs o�fM1e+ariout taendnos tbat wJ
Oe enUaletl -or I�e purposex al determmmg a aost amom[tor fFeze pasnbl2 aotl�homl.nalysc,
rlog tnat��e:otal�umber of�°45 tha��oulC Oote�nallv Oc ae�esteE mar no:wttcd
InellC�l�SddEi9ond' �TAs, ¢a[h aI J Il��t c05[ pl $142i00G. II R undYrstanE:9e [�3'. as l
imhur�a�le npe�>e.Pna�wilcre�au:ha�4aN�n Pem ine eiry�hall be r�ulre0 ano�:o ereamng any
W OIMS tdSkt dS50/qiPd W�lh 1hPT
1974 of 2719
- .- ... . -
-------------_ ._� _
ex-ieii d
ns>;1-II6]62 Ma-�:C[oxs
Po8e'.)of'.S
FEVISEO(2029.07.11�'EXHIBIT E'�O TME BASKONTRACf
�SPFCIFIf i0 iXE IONGTERM IMPpOVEMENTS TOOCE!N DRrvE AND W MMUS PANK)
PROIERSCNEDUIE(REVISED�
The followrng are an;iopated and esbmafed umes lor�he mmpletion of scope o(work,as detaifetl In Schedu�e
A. Oleasc note�hat.paRice�ar�.y with[Oordina[ion ine(review o(boa�ds and agcr¢irs,some review and
approval pro<esses maV�mpact/he schedule and prolong the duratron ol work beyonO the o��tml oi Ca�vin,
Giordano&Asso:iates, loc.vr Ih suD-consulcan6. These incluJe-.
• Flo�itlaDepartmentolTransportaUor
• FlonCaDepartmentofFvmonmen�alG�oleaion
• FloritlaFsnandWiltlllle[onserva[ionCammissio�
• M�iami-DadeCoumyOepanmen[oiTranspartationandPu�hcWcrks
• Ciry of Miami Beach Hlstoric Vreservation 6oard
I(EY MIlES(ONE DATES(REVISED�
Overall,this pro�ect is estimatetl to tatie approeimz[ely 3b'years to mmplete.Revlslonsto key estimand
milesfone dates are'�demitleC as tollows
Ori6inai Revised Date
06.09.�023 Notiw Io 7roceetl Is izsueC
06.1620Z4 DeterminationKqccepla�ceo�TraHlcEngineenngMethodology
by M�C-DrpW on wnf��guratlon options�or Ocean O�iv¢
ftev�son Note' Revisetl tlate resultmg(�on��e amoum of(ime R
tuok fo o6tain�Niews. appr�vals,and mncurrrnry trom pp(h
DTP W antl fDOT on Ihe me[hodoloRw and S�ope.
�uy 1G25 Gry Commission to seleot antl approve dmign voss sCRion fOr
ocean��We
Nugmt 2025 FpOT pynandi Tra/�i�psvgnment Study br�eipaPd noss-serCion�o
mmmence
Srptembea2W 5 Publit Engagement iw Lummi�a Park Commmces anC mntinucs
th�ough O�mber
Oecemher2W5 Anuapatpdtdrgelda�etorreceiptofagenqpermns
Febr�ary7016 Comple:io�o(30%Plans. Hnto/cPresenatwnBoard(HPB)
Cre-mee�ing
March 20Z6 HP8 FinalSubmission
May.2�26 Iinal approval bv Mistwic�'reservation Board�m boffi Ocea�
o,��� ,�a wm .aa.w
nuFusL2025 60%VIan5Com01etedCoTmPnreCCCLVPrmi(t��gwithFp.P
Oecemher-2016 90%PlamCompleted CCCLPermrt[ingmm0�eteC-
lanuary. ZOZr' Finalizeallpermrtting
Ieb�uary.70D ]00%vlansfmOceaoDnve
Notec
. The projecYs delay is�esulting6om the anount Ohlme I�took[o obiam rmiewi dppravak, dnd
con�urren�y fmrn bo��OipW and FDOT on[he me[hodofogy and xope,antl i[re�le�li Ne t'rme neede0 to
comp@t=t�e s;odies'equested hy the agenciee
7 In o�de�m r�ake-up for Ihp projeot Iime dedicated�o ob[slning and secunnq approvals to lhe[raff¢
engmeerin5 metho7obgY and oerform mg d,Ciry 5[afl reQuesmE that th¢project be re.strucmred ro ewpedite
the procea by mllaD>�ng some xope Rems��to:ongmeM ellorts As sUch.[hls apprca�b M1as res�lted in
1975 of 2719
ExnlBll d
a5A9] 116361-MermII.t0I5
�.g��)mi.s
motlilica[ions m the sche��le where p,e wo�4 tasks associatetl with Ihe nrig�nal smpe will be :ollapsetl
a<cordingly.
A5511MPTIONS
This scheeule is[enlatice,as rt ii depentlent on wveral assum0�ions and haorz that are bevond the contro o�
Calmrt,Giordano&Asrooa:es,Ina or its su6-ro�sul�antz, all e(which may impac Ne s�hedulr a�d tFr
� milestone tlatec fumished. The assumG�ions chat nave been made as a hasisof thls schedWe Intlude�.
1 The schedWe n basea on Ihe scope of work thaz has bren lumished.
1. Cily Staff and Ciry Commiv;lon will provi�e feedback on�emmmfndations and requests wiih cleady-
stated,decisive Ehectives,wdhou'requesting unrpasona6le amounts of design exploraGons or���isionz
to che 3esiRn approach.
3. City Commission�s emec[e0 to select are of[he three options far Ocean D�ive,as generally desaibeC In
�heatlopted4�C�Plan Directives�oexpbre�ybridverzionsofihedesignoptwnsmay�equire
atltlluonal tlesign Ome and may prolong the overall 5:hetlWe
6. Review commenl�anJ leedhack wlll be provided by Ciry AaH within Dwee�s'tinc etlei Vlans antl
des�gn materiaB are lwnmhed(or City SfaA rev�ew
5. W7entlesignpansarelarmsMOtoCMStaNforreviewandmmmen[,alltlepartmentsihall 'urnlsh
commentsronsisteotwRha[homughantmnpletereviewofthematenalsOmv�ded Rewew
mmmena mllected trom[he various City Departmen[s w�ll be orovi0ed wholesale and not piecemeal.
City StaN m review all commen[s oblained 6om In[emal tleparcments and provitle tlear dircUions on
how:o adtlress eac�,either in wriung o.in a commm[resoloDon mee[inq. Wnere delayed or akerthe-
lact mmmen6 a re recerveQ accompamed with requests or directives for moEificatiom m the Qesign.
(hese wJ�be eval�ated m deeermine Neir�.mpac�o�lhe ove�all schetlule.
6. �hecounesyreviewo�theNis[o�icvreserva[ioneoa�Ewillbeacmmnotla[etl�inanabntlgedOmeline
Sin�e(ormel appmvals will pol bP Soukh[dt thdl sppUfip mee[ing.
]. When requests�or O�rectives are pmvided m Ciry StaR[ity 5[a1/w�lllurnsh dear. 7ecisive Ai�nctives
wlthin 5 businrxv daya'nme.
8. Miami-DadeCountywilllurnishrespo�sfsms:udies,�ecommendationz,andquxsnonswithina
easonable amount ot Ume,not'o escerd 30 day3.
9. Oty ScaH wl�l partiopa[e in mordination meebngs wlth representa;ives pl t�e FloriOa Department of
Enmronrrer.�al Groteciion and wrth reprezeniativeso(the Flontla Fisfi and W+fdlifc Commiss:on fn good
faith m find an accep�able'middle-gmund'to achieve ilghting[hroughout[he prolect while balancing
che env�mnmen[al resrrirtbns sunounding twUe nestmg and wildli!¢. 4ny impasses between Ciry S[aH
and FOEGlFWC sYall only serve W pro�ong antl delay Me projecl.
10. I[ems piaceC an Commissian and fommufee agendm wlll be sc�etluletl In a timely fazM1ion antl are
eepected[o pe hearE when sc5etlule4 antl not deferred.
]L Ciry 4a�f antl tlm�tlmg Drnanmant.ev�ew ramme��.z6ali be dearly_aataE.MorougM1 antl s0?oflc m�he
pmject
Ir Is importar, ro r.me tha�debYs may be cumulaUve and,depmding on how the d<layed task is 5�wate0 wrcM1in
the overall se0uence af work,the ilme lost tlue to Ihe tlelay may not he made up. As mch, delays wdl be
evaluateJ an a case�by�ca5e batis and[he mllestone Cales will�e revised aaor�ingly.
1976 of 2719
rn-.i.,�i �y
E%HIBIi i-F0.0YOSEUFEE BRfAX00WN
�SVE[IFlC iOTMf SMOPb1EPM�MPROVEMEN1110 O<E�N ONIVE�
Ae mn mGurrt n`�iry S��«,'��e Inllowhg cose E�=a+dnwn k cra�ide�
Tas4 ono�p��on feesRepuired ittsReouired
mcompie�e w�ompe�e
SlMwalk ��I�����
RtO�«mmt Imp�Ovemmb
Task: �a�aCoileciian&[.aloa�on : ]96a00
LmiievtDeagn&WnexM1Piweu 5 3280500
30i65c�enanc�lan 5 1'1.0I000 5 6.eC1d0
upe Pqrwal 5 16.5<!IV
La;42 605GCon;vuctionola^;P•eo�"�6on S 93.']000 S 21.600.00
ir.ki Agmry�c•mNmg 5 13.a90W 5 8.�3fi.W
Iacka 94°dFa^sA'epa'atlon > 33.81800 5 l2,WGA0
IaskS Gcy�Departme���erm�tt�A 5 5.31G00
Tuk6 ��nalPlars:ntlBc�oamen[s 5 16.06600 5 �,92����
SuE-taal $ 2]3.915.00 $ SI,591.00
LaaY rGanNana6Pnenil<'�I
5 P9',3f✓� S ).l0ine
Totil S I31.II].60 5 5�.69<.N
Tatal Fees�.
� SmewalxR.place+mtOnp 5 ]llJP60
• SiaewalkFeDlacemenv�dgn[inf �G�ovemer�a +5 5469�b<-51B6:i}21�
1977 of 2719
t..�u=u n
fXNIBIT G-PNbCIY�TE�SCNf DIILf
�SVFOfiC iOTHf 5NO0.T-TFRM iMPROVEMENTS i00CE�N DWVEI
IFe�ollowinpr"nentr.�pavetla�nn=ummnlc��esiormemnp�rnonnlvoPnofwo�Y Piaasrno����z,
partimlarly witM1 oorEn6twn inC review CI ooardi and agerKles,scme re.iew anE appmva�pr�cessts may
apazt:M1e sMeduk and prolany p�c Je�epan ol wo'M beyond tM1e�pnrco af��i��r,Gb�d.rm 6 4�vua�Ic�, Int
orRssub-aonwllants. Thoemcl�de�.
• FIo.i4a0epar[merto�fnri�onmenlalP�otetlnn
• �lonaaoepartmentotionspo�:atmn
• MiamiLd4PCAUnry]epartncntol'�nntpur1d1i0nandVu0rt4V:ikS
• GrynfM��.imiBe.mFaiaoncVieservauo^Poa.d
KEY MI(ESIONf TAAGEiOATFS
NeyrelimaledmlleslonetleleSarpldrnlifleUBslol�awa.a +edona�emNlo nNiPnolalerlFanC/}if}0)5
tl�n.nTv erccm..a�a�mt�an�hennieeearc.allmiiumne�wli�neee�oneae,urtenarmraingly
MM�Ian202S R�dLxeDy2C01kfJo�GEailua00n
MsaRI92S Complr'ePu64c0utread
�pd13035 nnmenuonmelryCommlssfan
np.I 15.1oi5 Is�oan;e o1 NP
Iure10)5 Pre6m�rerpjOA�la•�rCamptte.FP9P�e-atlMPe�ing
Nty.iOli HVB�i�aSubmTtal
�O�Cmeer]gj5 NCBnpprOml
➢oremM1rr]L25 6G%lmsn:eanYlpns�omplptre',Cammonrr:l.-Ivr�mR
Mri12026 90x.Consv�con>IamCompletetl:CCCI�'ermitf'na��eeE
May1J26 ,naliaea�IVerm�rcing
Iune1W6 :Gtl94 Comr�ofon pl,ins[pmple�etl
1978 of 2719