R5C-Minimum Unit Sizes For Historic Hotels And RM-2 Tower Setbacks-------------------
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
Second Reading to consider an Ordinance Amendment modifying the minimum unit size requirements
for existing, historic hotels, as well as the tower setback requirements for properties less than 60' in
hei ht and located in the RM-2 district.
Ke Intended Outcome Supported:
Maintain strong growth management policies.
Supporting Data (Surveys, Environmental Scan, etc 48% of residential respondents and 55% of
businesses rate the effort put forth b the Ci tore ulate develo mentis "about the ri ht amount."
Item Summa /Recommendation:
SECOND READING
The proposed Ordinance would modify the mm1mum unit size requirements for existing, historic
hotels, as well as the tower setback requirements for properties less than 60' in height and located in
the RM-2 district.
The subject Ordinance was first reviewed by the City Commission on May 8, 2013. The Commission
referred the Ordinance to the Historic Preservation Board for their input. The Ordinance was approved
by the Commission at First Reading on July 17, 2013.
The Administration recommends that the Cit Commission adopt the Ordinance.
Adviso Board Recommendation:
On April 3, 2013, the Planning Board transmitted the subject Ordinance to the City Commission by a
vote of 7-0.
On June 11, 2013, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed the subject Ordinance and
recommended approval.
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account
Funds: 1
D 2
3
OBPI Total
Financial Impact Summary:
In accordance with Charter Section 5.02, which requires that the "City of Miami Beach shall consider
the long term economic impact (at least 5 years) of proposed legislative actions," this shall confirm
that the City Administration evaluated the long term economic impact (at least 5 years) of this
proposed legislative action. The proposed Ordinance is not expected to have any tangible fiscal
impact.
Assistant City Manager
T:\AGENDA\2013\September 11\Historic Hotel Unit Size& RM2 S tbacks-SUM 2nd Read.d ex
MIAMI BEACH 507
City Manager
AGENDA ITEM _R:,.:..:::S=,...C..~
DATE ?-//---13
MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gav
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Matti Herrera Bower and M mbers ofthe~sion
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE: September 11, 2013
SECOND READING
SUBJECT: Minimum Unit Sizes for Historic otels & RM-2 Tower Setbacks
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 142, ENTITLED '"ZONING DISTRICTS AND
REGULATIONS", BY AMENDING ARTICLE II, ENTITLED "DISTRICT
REGULATIONS", BY AMENDING DIVISION 3, ENTITLED "RESIDENTIAL
MULTIFAMILY DISTRICTS", BY AMENDING SECTION 142-155 TO
MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOTEL ROOM SIZE FOR
HISTORIC HOTELS WITHIN THE RM-1 DISTRICT; BY AMENDING
SECTION 142-217 TO MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM
HOTEL ROOM SIZE FOR HISTORIC HOTELS WITHIN THE RM-2 DISTRICT;
BY AMENDING SECTION 142-218 TO MODIFY THE TOWER SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE RM-2 DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION
142-246 TO MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOTEL ROOM
SIZE FOR HISTORIC HOTELS WITHIN THE RM-3 DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Ordinance.
BACKGROUND
At the June 13, 2012 Land Use Committee meeting, Planning Department staff
presented ideas for improving efficiency and reducing the costs and timeframes
associated with the Board review process. The Committee requested that staff bring
back a list of common variances that go to the Board of Adjustment.
At the July 25, 2012 Land Use Committee meeting, Planning Department staff presented
examples of variances that were fairly routine and common. These variances also
represented areas of the existing zoning code that could be modified to reduce the
number of applications that are required to go to the Board of Adjustment for public
hearing. Planning staff was instructed to bring the modifications necessary to reduce and
eliminate variances in these particular areas back to the Committee in Ordinance form.
508
Commission Memorandum
Historic Hotel Unit Sizes & RM-2 Tower Setbacks
September 11, 2013 Page 2 of 3
On January 23, 2013, Planning staff proposed three (3) separate Ordinances to the
Land Use Committee; these Ordinances pertained to
• RM-3 Accessory Use Signage
• Accessory Setback Encroachments
• Minimum Units Sizes for Historic Hotels and RM-2 Setback Requirements
Each of these proposed Ordinances was referred to the Planning Board by the Land Use
Committee on January 23, 2013 and by the City Commission on February 6, 2013.
ANALYSIS
Several unit size variances have recently been granted for historic hotels, which have
undergone extensive renovation, in the City Center and on the Oceanfront. When an
existing building is significantly renovated, the Code requires that the minimum hotel unit
size be met (3151330 sq. ft.). However, the existing room configuration in historic hotel
buildings is often under this minimum required room size. Variances are consistently
granted for these projects, as it is considered a true hardship, since the floor plates of
historic hotel buildings often cannot be easily reconfigured. The existing building's
pattern of windows match the room configuration, and the exterior of the historic building
cannot be altered by removing or rearranging window placement.
Also, in the MXE district (Ocean Drive and Collins Avenue between 51h and 15th)' a
smaller minimum room size of 200 square feet is permitted. The historic hotels outside
the MXE district are often similar in nature to those in the MXE. In order to address this,
the proposed Ordinance would permit the renovation of existing historic hotels without
the need for room size variances, as long as a minimum unit size of 200 square feet is
met.
As it pertains to tower setback requirements, the RM-2 residential multifamily, medium
intensity district is designed for medium intensity multiple-family residences. The
development regulations vary depending on what area of the City the RM-2 district is
located in, with the maximum height permitted ranging from six (6) stories I 60 feet to
fifteen ( 15) stories I 140'. Setbacks for buildings are divided into pedestal setbacks (the
first 50 feet of height) and tower setbacks (that portion of a building above 50 feet in
height). Any building that is proposed to be six stories is allowed to be at the required
pedestal setbacks for the first five stories, but the sixth story or top floor must be set
back to meet the tower setbacks.
The additional setback above 50' makes sense for taller buildings, and in the past the
RM-2 district allowed much taller buildings. However, almost all the six story buildings
built in the past years have sought and obtained variances for the sixth floor tower
setbacks, as it is much easier to design a building that goes straight up, rather than
setting back the uppermost floor to meet the different tower setback.
PLANNING BOARD REVIEW
The Planning Board reviewed the subject Ordinance on April 3, 2013, and transmitted it
to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation by a vote of 7 to 0. The
Ordinance referred by the Land Use Committee proposed to retain the tower setbacks
as they are for all buildings higher than six stories, and allow buildings of six stories or
less to follow the pedestal setback all the way to the top. During the review of the
Ordinance, the Planning Board expressed some concerns with this proposal, as
recessing the top floor of a 6 story structure, in most instances, resulted in a better
dimensioned, and more appropriately massed building.
509
Commission Memorandum
Historic Hotel Unit Sizes & RM-2 Tower Setbacks
September 11, 2013 Page 3 of 3
The Planning Board did agree that making the pedestal and tower setbacks uniform on
the interior side for buildings six (6) stories or less made sense, as these portions of the
structure are not as visible and the extra setback was only one (1 ')foot.
The Administration agrees with this approach, and would recommend that the City
Commission approve the Ordinance with this change.
FISCAL IMPACT
In accordance with Charter Section 5.02, which requires that the "City of Miami Beach
shall consider the long term economic impact (at least 5 years) of proposed legislative
actions," this shall confirm that the City Administration evaluated the long term economic
impact (at least 5 years) of this proposed legislative action. The proposed Ordinance is not
expected to have any tangible fiscal impact.
UPDATE
On May 8, 2013, the subject Ordinance was considered by the City Commission at First
Reading. The Commission deferred action on the matter, and referred it to the Historic
Preservation Board for their input.
On June 11th, 2013, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed the proposed
Ordinance, and adopted the attached Resolution supporting the legislation. The HPB also
recommended that the proposed ordinance be amended to provide for a maximum 20%
reduction in square footage for existing hotel units, in order to meet life safety requirements,
provided that all units are no less than 200 square feet. The foregoing amendment
recommended by the HPB was incorporated it into the text of the Ordinance, prior to First
Reading.
On July 17, 2013, the City Commission approved the proposed Ordinance at First Reading.
A small typo, adding 'accessibility regulations' to the allowable exceptions, was corrected for
Second Reading.
Additionally, as indicated previously, the hotel units size portion of the subject Ordinance
only applies to historic district properties located within multi-family residential zoning districts
(RM-1, 2 & 3). As a number of historic district hotels are also located within commercial
zoning districts (CD-1, 2 & 3), it is further recommended that the City Commission refer a
similar Ordinance Amendment to the Planning Board or the Land Use and Development
Committee, which would cover commercial properties.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the Ordinance.
The Administration also recommends that the Commission refer a separate Ordinance
Amendment, pertaining to historic district hotel unit sizes for those properties located within
commercial zoning districts (CD-1, 2 & 3), to the Planning Board or the Land Use and
Development Committee for consideration.
JLM/JJ/RG~RM
T\AGENDA\2013\September 11\Historic Hotel Unit Size& RM2 Setbacks-MEM 2nd Read.docx
510
MINIMUM UNIT SIZES FOR HISTORIC HOTELS & RM-2 TOWER SETBACKS
ORDINANCE NO. ___ _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 142, "ZONING DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS," BY
AMENDING ARTICLE II, "DISTRICT REGULATIONS," BY AMENDING
DIVISION 3, "RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DISTRICTS," BY AMENDING
SECTION 142-155 TO MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOTEL
ROOM SIZE FOR HISTORIC HOTELS WITHIN THE RM-1 DISTRICT; BY
AMENDING SECTION 142-217 TO MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMUM HOTEL ROOM SIZE FOR HISTORIC HOTELS WITHIN THE RM-2
DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION 142-218 TO MODIFY THE TOWER
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE RM-2 DISTRICT; BY AMENDING
SECTION 142-246 TO MODIFY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM HOTEL
ROOM SIZE FOR HISTORIC HOTELS WITHIN THE RM-3 DISTRICT;
PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach endeavors to recall and promote its unique social
and architectural history, as well as further the dynamic character and attraction of hotels within
historic districts; and
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach seeks to encourage and incentivize the retention,
preservation and restoration of hotel structures located within historic districts; and
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach desires to amend existing minimum unit size
requirements for existing hotels within historic districts; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are necessary to accomplish all of the above
objectives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. City Code Chapter 142, Article II, "District Regulations," Division 3, "Residential
Multifamily Districts," Subdivision II, "RM-1 Residential Multifamily Low Intensity," is hereby
amended as follows:
Sec. 142-155.-Development regulations and area requirements
*
(b)The lot area, lot width, unit size and building height requirements for the RM-1 residential
multifamily, low density district are as follows:
511
Minimum Minimum Minimum Average Maximum Maximum
Lot Area Lot Unit Size Unit Size BuildingHeight Number
(Square Width (Square Feet) (Square Feet) (Feet) of Stories
Feet) (Feet)
5,600 50 New construction-550 New Historic Historic
Non-elderly and elderly low construction-BOO district-40 district-4
and moderate income housing: Non-elderly and Flamingo Park Flamingo Park
See section 142-1183 elderly low and Local Historic Local Historic
Rehabilitated buildings-400 moderate income District-35 District-3
Hotel unit: housing: See section (except as (except as
15%: 300-335 141-1183 provided in provided in
85%: 335+ Rehabilitated section section
For contributing hotel buildings-550 142-1161 142-1161
structures 1 located within a Otherwise-50 Otherwise-5
local historic district or a
national r~ister district1 which
are renovated in accordance
with the Secretary of the
Interior Standards and
Guidelines for the
Rehabilitation of Historic
Structures as amended 1
retaining the existing room
configuration and sizes of at
least ZOO sguare feet shall be
Qermitted. AdditionaL!~,
existing room configuratiQns
fQr the above described hotel
structures ma~ be modified to
address a[!!;l:licab:le life-safet~
and accessibilit~ regulations,
12rovided the ZOO sguare feet
minimum unit size is
maintained.
SECTION 2. City Code Chapter 142, Article II, "District Regulations", Division 3, "Residential
Multifamlly Districts", Subdivision IV, "RM-2 Residential Multifamily Medium Intensity", is hereby
amended as follows:
Sec. 142-217. -Area requirements.
The area requirements in the RM-2 residential multifamily, medium intensity district are as
follows:
Minimum Minimum
Lot Area Lot
(Square Width
Feet) (Feet)
Minimum
Unit Size
(Square Feet)
Average
Unit Size
(Square Feet)
512
Maximum
Building
Height
(Feet)
Maximum
Number
of Stories
7,000 50 New construction-550 New Historic Historic
Non-elderly and elderly low construction-BOO district-50 district-S
and moderate income Non-elderly and (except as (except as
housing: See section 142-1183 elderly low and provided in provided in
Rehabilitated buildings-400 moderate income section section
Hotel unit: housing: See 142-1161 142-1161
15%: 300-335 section 142-1183 Area bounded Area bounded
85%: 335+ Rehabilitated by Indian Creek by Indian
For contributing hotel buildings-550 Dr., Collins Creek Dr.,
structures, located within a Hotel units-N I A Ave., 26th St., Collins Ave.,
local historic district or a and 44th St.-75 26th St., and
national register district, Area fronting 44th St.-8
which are renovated in west side of Area fronting
accordance with the Collins Ave. west side of
Secretary of the Interior btwn. 76th St. Collins Ave.
Standards and Guidelines for and 79th St.-75 btwn. 76th St.
the Rehabilitation of Historic Otherwise-60 and 79th St.-8
Structures as amended, Lots fronting Otherwise-6
retaining the existing room Biscayne Bay Lots fronting
configuration and sizes of at less than 45,000 Biscayne Bay
least 200 sguare feet shall be sq. ft.-100 less than
12ermitted. Additionall;x:, the Lots fronting 45,000 sq.
existing room configurations Biscayne Bay ft.-11
for the above described hotel over 45,000 sq. Lots fronting
structures ma;x: be modified to ft.-140 Biscayne Bay
address a~Blicable life-safet;x: Lots fronting over 45,000 sq.
and accessibilit;x: regulations, Atlantic Ocean ft.-15
~rovide:d the 200 sguare over 100,000 sq. Lots fronting
feet minimum unit size is ft.-140 Atlantic Ocean
maintained. over 100,000
sq. ft.-15
... ... ...
Sec. 142-218.-Setback requirements.
The setback requirements in the RM-2 residential multifamily, medium intensity district are as
follows:
Front Side, Side, Facing Rear
Interior a Street
At-grade parking 20 feet 5 feet, or 5% of lot 5 feet, or 5% of Non-oceanfront
lot on the same width, whichever is lot width, lots-5 feet
lot except where greater whichever is Oceanfront lots-50
(b) below is greater feet from bulkhead
applicable line
513
Subterranean 20 feet 5 feet, or 5% of lot 5 feet, or 5% of Non-oceanfront
width, whichever is lot width, lots-0 feet
greater. (0 feet if lot whichever is Oceanfront lots-50
width is 50 feet or greater feet from bulkhead
less) line
Pedestal 20 feet Sum of the side yards Sum of the side Non-oceanfront
Except lots A and 1-30 shall equal16% of lot yards shall equal lots-1 0% of lot
of the Amended Plat width 16% of lot width depth
Indian Beach Minimum-7.5 feet or Minimum-7.5 Oceanfront
Corporation Subdivision 8% of lot width, feet or 8% of lot lots-20% of lot
and lots 231-237 of the whichever is greater width, whichever depth, 50 feet from
Amended Plat of First is greater the bulkhead line
Ocean Front whichever is greater
Subdivision-50 feet
Tower 20 feet + 1 foot for every Same as ]2edestal for Sum of the side Non-oceanfront
1 foot increase in height structures with a total yards shall equal lots-15% of lot
above 50 feet, to a height of 60' or less. 16% of the lot depth
maximum of 50 feet, then The required pedestal width Oceanfront
shall remain constant. setback plus 0.10 of Minimum-7.5 lots-25% of lot
Except lots A and 1-30 the height of the tower feet or 8% of lot depth, 75 feet
of the Amended Plat portion of the building. width, whichever minimum from the
Indian Beach The total required is greater bulkhead line
Corporation Subdivision setback shall not whichever is greater
and lots 231-237 of the exceed 50 feet
Amended Plat of First
Ocean Front
Subdivision-50 feet
SECTION 3. City Code Chapter 142, Article II, "District Regulations", Division 3, "Residential
Multifamily Districts", Subdivision v, "RM-3 Residential Multifamily High Intensity", is hereby
amended as follows:
Sec. 142-246.-Development regulations and area requirements.
* * *
(b)The lot area, lot width, unit size and building height requirements for the RM-3 residential
multifamily, high intensity district are as follows:
Minimum Minimum Minimum Average Maximum Maximum
Lot Area Lot Unit Size Unit Size Building Height Number
(Square Width (Square Feet) (Square Feet) (Feet) of Stories
Feet) (Feet)
7,000 50 New construction-550 New 150 16
Non-elderly and construction-BOO
elderly low and Non-elderly and Oceanfront tots-200 Oceanfront lots-22
moderate income elderly low and Architectural dist.: Architectural dist:
housing: See section moderate income New New
514
142-1183 housing: See construction-120; construction-13;
Rehabilitated section 142-1183 ground floor ground floor
buildings-400 Rehabilitated additions (whether additions (whether
Hotel unit: buildings-550 attached or attached or
15%: 300-335 Hotel units-N/ A detached) to detached) to
85%: 335+ existing structures existing structures
For contributing hotel on oceanfront on oceanfront
structures, located lots-50 (except as lots-5 (except as
within a local historic provided in section provided in section
district or a national 142-1161 142-1161
register district,
which are renovated
in accordance with
the Secreta!Y of the
Interior Standards and
Guidelines for the
Rehabilitation of
Historic Structures as
amended, retaining
the existing room
configuration and
sizes of at least 200
sguare feet shall be
germ it ted.
AdditiQnall~1 the
existing room
configurations for the
above: described hotf:l
structures rna~ be
modified to address
a1212licablf: life-safet~
and accessibilit~
r~ulations 1 ~rovided
the 200 sguare feet
minimum unit size is
maintained.
SECTION 4. CODIFICATION.
It is the intention of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, and it is
hereby ordained that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the Code
of the City of Miami Beach, Florida. The sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or
relettered to accomplish such intention, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section",
"article", or other appropriate word.
SECTION 5. REPEALER.
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby
repealed.
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, clause or prov1s1on of this Ordinance is held invalid, the
remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity.
515
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect ten days following adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of-------' 2013.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
First Reading: July 17, 2013
Second Reading: September 11, 2013
Verified by: :--:--:--=---:---:-:-::-=---: ........... -----
Richard G. Lorber, AICP, LEED AP
Acting Planning Director
Strike Thru denotes deleted language
Underscore denotes new language
MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
City Attorney Date
Double Underscore denotes new language recommended by Historic Preservation Board
08/12/2013
T:\AGENDA\2013\September 11\Historic Hotel Unit Size& RM2 Setbacks-ORO 2nd Read.docx
516
I
MIAMI BEACH
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARINGS
NOTICE IS HEJIEBV gM!r> that public hearings wiD be he!~ by ltle Mayor and City Gotml!sslon of the City ol
M-i Beach, Florida, In lh<! Comrniosion CMrnb<om, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 1 7llO C«<V0<111on C<!llt<!r OrNe, Mleml Boaoh, f!alda,
on Wednesd"!', Seplember11, 2013 to co-lhe !l)llowlfl!i:
!0:16a.M.
An Or<Jklancc lmplamMting Pro<tiolcn• Of 1M :W12-2015 Cdleelivto Bargaining A<;\rnllr!l<!r>l B-~" The Cit( Md
The Communl<:atklM W<>rk.,.. 01 Amerir.3, tCWA)l<>eal 3178; Implementing SlrrOlor Rellremant Plan MlohdniiJllt!l F« Membill'$
Who Ato Not Included In Arry Bargaining Unit; Amending Tho Mlaml Bueh I:!Til>lov-' lltnln!""'nt Pion CrEa~ed By Ordlnonoe
2Crlfr35C4; Amending Section 2 26 Of The Plan By E:rtendlng The Dofcrmd Rotiromont Opllon ?tM (f'lanJ 1'"'9<am From Tllni<l r.ll
To FlY• (5) y...,.. l'or Sio;ible M<!mb""'; Amending Soctlon 6.1 il T<> Ro!lect Amended Ellgibllily And Partlcipallon Requlmmill'll!l And
Amended DROP ?ton fil31ures; Amending Section 4.03 By Ellmlna!lng Tho i'l.!rehaso or Add11:1CI\al Crn-&r>tce Fer Certain
Members; Providing Ftr 8"'""-Y> Repooling All Ortlinan=ln Confllot Tll<row!!h; And Pro.tdlng An llfective Oale.
lnqtJiries may bo dlroeled IDlfl<llliJrnan ~.., Doparlmont {;lOS) 673·7524,
10>.30a.m.
An OrdlnmlCil Amending ordln....,.. No. 7!l!t, Tho a~ EmploYQM s.laoy Ordln;mc$ or Tho City 01 Miami ~ooh. Florida,
Ill; l'oiiQws: P~ For The Classifications n Group IV, RepmseniEd By The Communl<:Ollon• Workers 01 Arne >lea /(:.Wii) locol
3178, In Accordance Wilt! The NegO!Iated Coleclll<e Bargaining Agreement. Etfeclll<e ~ 1, 2012, The"' 5/leU Be Aft In'"'""'"
Of Eloveii Feroont (11 %iTo The Ms><i'num Woge For The Q,..,.lieallons 01 Lll6goord II Al1d Ufesuard Lk>uteNI!lt El!ecllve The
Fir$! Pay f'el'lo<l Endlng In ~er or2014, The"' Shall Be An """""' The Boon:! Cmi-OHMng Adjl!SirMrlt (COLA) 0! TlltElo
F'erc<ml (3%), And Tho Minimum And Mlll<im..-n Of E.acn Pay Range Wll Also a~ lncrened By Thre" P""""'t (3%j; Rape&'lfl!l All
Crdinai\Ce!>ln Conflict; Providing FuSev..abiity, An EffedNo Date Al'ld Codlficatlon.
lnqtJi~esmay badltectlld to1he II!Jruan ~ O.pat!ment (3\JS) 673-7524.
10:45 a.m.
MinimUm Unit Sizes for Hl$tarla Hw.ls Al'ld RM--2 Tower Sa1bocks
Ordinance Amel\dlng The Land Devt:l<>pment Regulrulon5 Of The Code Of Tho City 01 Miami S.adl, By Amending Chapter 1 42·,
"Zon<ng DIB1rk:tsAI1d Aegula!lons,' By Amandlnq Anlele U, •ctmct llegJiatlcno." By An"'ndlng Dilli!llon 3, ·--Mullllarnlly
Dislrlcls,' By Amending S""'lon "142 155"To Madly The ReqtJitemonts For Minimum HolEol Room Slza Fer IUototic H<rtcla Willi In
The RM-1 Dlstllel; By """"ndlng Soctloo "142-217" To Modify The Requlrsmot!lll FOI' Minimum Hotel Room Size for HatOfic
Hotels Wlthln The RM-2 Dlatnct; By Amending Section "142·2111" T<> ModlfyTheTowerSetheck R<qul~ W1ltlin The RM-2
Dlslrlct; By Amending Section "142 ·246" To ModifY The FleqtJI"""""ts For Min limon Hotol Room Size For Historic Hoto!s Wllhn
The RM-3 District;
11;00 .......
Ordnance Amondl-lg Chapter 90 01 The Miami S<a:;h City C<>OO. Ernftled "S"'io:l WasiE." By """""ding Artlc!a V, Ent!!led
·~e.Reey!:nng Program For Multifamily ResldenceoAn!l Commerx:IOI E"""'"lohmenb." By Amondlog Sccllon 00-343. EtrtiUed
'Pilbllc Educrul"" Progrom; Requirements For Re<)yll!ng ConiJ1lCio!'e; Waml11y Portod; Enlorcornei'll Dale.' By Ei<ten<!lng The
Warning Ponod From Ju!1o30. 2Q1~To Ocoernber31. 2013 And e.t<mdlngThe Beginning OIThe Enlorcllment Periodfl'Wl July 1,
:.ro13 To Jonuruy 1, 2014; By Arnondlng soc~oo sc-345, E'nlltkld ·Ent~~ment, • By ettendlng The Beglming 01 The E!'lforoern<lnl
P<nld From Joly 1, 2013ToJanuary' ,2!l14_
11;15a.m.
Ordinance Amending Chap!"" go Of Tho Mlorlll BI!IIOh City Codol, Entlllad "Solid 'l'lasle," Dy Amending Sectton 90-39 &llltled
'FIM Sched.ile For\llolallon•lo~ And Applied To D.vne-s, Agerrts, Tenanl!\, OcoupenlB, Operallll'$ Or Mm•gors, Or P..-aons
R""P<JflSible For The Vldrulon," By Amendll'l!O The Fine Seh<Odulu For \llala!lono. ot Sectloo 90-36 And 9~ And Pm;idlng Far
ConsfmEflt Terminology Regarrtklg Fire! And Subsequent Ollerules; By Arn•nding Sa.:tlon SO·<IO, Entitled 'Fine SchEdllie For
Vldollons01Sedlon• go .. aa: 90·'07;9D-19' ElSeq.: ~22' EtSeq.;AndSC-2118 By PrMrt•Wastec-· By AmendinG
And Pr<Nidlng For Fme SChlldlt•• And Vlolatlona C~tun! Wilt\ The 1'!\>vislons 111 The R~ s.cttom And n Seetlonl!
00-::16, 90·9$, And 90-iCO, And p..,;o;1ng For Consistent T0011lnology Aeg-og Flrot And S.t>requenl Olfen .. s; By AmendinG
Secllon 90·222, Cntitled ·ust Of Accounts. • By Providing Roportln9 l<oqul""'""'b For DIOO<>nflnued Aoorunt• Conol!llmt Wllh
Soo!lon !IIJ-36.
11:30am.
Ordinanco Amendlntl eMptor 82 Of The City Coello, Entitled •Public Property." By Am ending Miele Ill, En!lfted • ~oming Of ?u!JIIo
Facllltleo And ,_lollmmt 0! Monuments Or Memorial•." By·Amending Serrli<rt 82-!>03, Enll11&d "Nart'iirll; Of Public F!ldlhl•s.'
Ely Eliminating The Requirement Of A Referend11m In Such Cases When The Focility T<> Se >lame<:! or Rename<:~ Is Clly Owned,
An<! Not Already Named For An lndi'Jidual Or Individuals ?urnu..-.tlo Sac!~ en 82·503(11)\4), And The Propoud N~~rne lr1cl•<le$
Tho Name 01 The f'h)'Sicall.t>eatlon Otlh<l Facility Or The Facility To ae 'lamod or R<mamed, 'M>ltl\ May lncllldo! The N\1me Of
The Park And/Or Street 'Mlere The FacUlty Is loceted.
~<l'Ji!Ul$ orny b<t-to !he City A~~'& O!f!ce (3051673-747C.
L'ITEAESTED PARTIES am ln'llted fl:> appear a! this m .. tirlg, or be repreMI'Tted by an agent, or 10 ~ lheil' v!ew11ln wrffing
ac!dre$sed !o !he Chy Commission. c!o the Cll'l Cieri<, 1700 C<lftvenlion Canter Drive, 1st Floor; .City Hiil, MIM'II llMch,
Florida 3:3139. C¢pie& of th-ltoms ar• avalllbl• for publle inopoetion o..ing """""'--in 111" City Clerk's Olfice,
1700 Conven!lorl Cen!l!r Drive, 1m Floor, CHy Hall, Miami Beach, florida 33~3!1. Thl!nooatins cr arr; oftM IMmsheroln may b<>
CO!'Itinuod. end urn:lerwoh elrcLNT1Man<n addltlonall"9"' notice wl! not b<> provided.
Rafael 1:. Granado, Cll)' Clm:
Clly of \!I ami Beach
Pumi.Hll'lt to Sectioo 21!6.01 05, Ra. 81al, the Glty hemby ~the public that~ a peBOn clet:ld<:s to aj:peal ""''deol:lion made
by the Clly Commission wfth resp<>ct to any matt..-"""oidered at ib onee!frlg or lis heerlng, sueh person must ensurn that a
Vlllbatlm rec.oo1 of th,. pmc~nss Is I'Mdc, wtleh reeon:llnoludes the tes!!mony "'d evfdenc:e upon wh!cll tire oppeaJ ism ba
' b~. This notice doesnctcon!!iltute OO!>!Jenl by lire C~yfor the lntradurrlioo or oclmiMI<ln of ott,.,rwl,.iMdmloslbleor Irrelevant
<Mdooce, nor does h authorize <MIIens•• or appeal> not olh""""" ollowed by,.,.,,
10 request tills malerl<ll In ""~" klimat sign language interpretem, ltilurmallon an acc<~>ll fer p.;r!IMo with dlolabiiiUcs and!
or any ~atlon to r<M.w any d~t or p~ in any Cily-spcn•o:"'!d ~ng. pl-eor1lncl ""~vo d"Y" ir1
advance at (305) fi73-7411(voicej orTfY ooars may alrooaJI tho Flofldo Relay SE<VIu at 711,
Adt-'799
517
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
518