R7F-Accept Recommendation Collins Park Place Project,n
-
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
At its May 14, 2014 Flooding Mitigation Committee meeting, a special presentation was made by Mr.
Gustavo Berenblum, Principal Architect at Berenblum Busch Architecture lnc., a firm currently working
on the Collins Park Garage project. The firm introduced its current design for the project, as well as
designs reflecting an increased base flood elevation by two and three feet. The raised design plan
proposes stairs, ramps and platforms, all of which are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA), as well as an elevated plaza.
Following the presentation, the committee made a recommendation to: 1) Raise the proposed ground
floor elevation of Collins Park Place project to base flood plus three feet; 2) Accept the concept of
Collins Park Place presented by the architect incorporating the raised floor of BFE plus three feet; 3)
Refer the recommendation of establishing a base flood elevation plus three feet as the required criteria
for all new and remodel residential and commercial buildings to the Land Use Commiftee for further
consideration.
The Municipal Code for the City of Miami Beach, under Sections 54-31 to 54-58, governs the setting of
the finish floor for all new construction. The State of Florida, under F.S. '166 also authorizes the City to
establish their own finished floor elevations to promote health, safety and general welfare.
The proposed ground floor retail spaces for Collins Park Place, as currently designed, are set betvveen
5.70 NAVD and 6.55 NAVD. Base Flood Elevation is 6.54 NAVD, while the existing sidewalk elevations
range between 4.22 NAVD - 5.50 NAVD.
ln order to comply with the requirement to raise the ground finish floor elevation to Base Flood plus
three feet (9.54 NAVD), the new finish floor elevation will need to be set at4.04ft to 5.32ft higher than
the existing sidewalk.
The design team has developed a preliminary concept that resolves this challenge by elevating the
entire site and gradually sloping the sidewalk along Park Avenue and 23rd Street to meet the required
finish floor elevation. This solution preserves the natural pedestrian flow into each retail space as well as
egress from adjacent buildings, while still accommodating ADA requirements throughout. The concept
was presented and approved by the Flooding Mitigation Committee on May 15,2014.
THE ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDS ADOPTING THE RESOLUTION
Board Recommendation:
Financial
AGENDA ITEM R?F6lFrq-
Condensed Title:
A Resolution Approving And Accepting The Recommendation Of The Flooding Mitigation Committee To:
1) Raise The Proposed Ground Floor Elevation Of Collins Park Place Project To Base Flood Plus Three
Feet; 2) Accept The Concept Of Collins Park Place Presented By Berenblum Busch Architecture lnc. To
lncorporate The Raised Floor Of Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Plus Three Feet, And; 3) Refer The
Recommendation Of Establishing Base Flood Elevation Plus Three Feet, As A Required Criteria For All
New And Remodel Residential And Commercial Buildings To The Land Use Committee For Further
Consideration.
Su Data Environmental Scan. etc,): N/A
N/A
Eric T.ext. 6012
DATE644
E MIAMIBEACH
City of ,ltiomi Beoch, 1 700 Convenlion Center Drive, Miomi Beoch, Florido 331 39, www. miomibeochfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Philip Levine and Members of th City Comm
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
DATE: June 11,2014
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING ANDTACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATIoN oF
THE FLOODING MITIGATION COMMITTEE TO: 1) RAISE THE PROPOSED
GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION OF COLLINS PARK PLACE PROJECT TO BASE
FLOOD PLUS THREE FEET; 2) AGCEPT THE CONCEPT OF COLLINS PARK
PLACE PRESENTED BY BERENBLUM BUSCH ARCHITECTURE INC. TO
INCoRPoRATE THE RATSED FLOOR OF BASE FLOOD ELEVATTON (BFE) PLUS
THREE FEET, AND; 3) REFER THE RECOMMENDATION OF ESTABLISHING
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS THREE FEET, AS A REQUIRED CRITERIA FOR
ALL NEW AND REMODEL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCTAL BUILDINGS TO
THE LAND USE GOMMITTEE FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION.
BACKGROUND
At its May 14, 2014 Flooding Mitigation Committee meeting, a special presentation was made
by Mr. Gustavo Berenblum, Principal Architect at Berenblum Busch Architecture lnc., a firm
currently working on the Collins Park Garage project. The firm introduced its current design for
the project, as well as designs reflecting an increased base flood elevation by two and three feet
(ATTACHMENT). The raised design plan proposes stairs, ramps and platforms, all of which are
compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as well as an elevated plaza.
Following the presentation, the committee made a recommendation to:
'1) Raise the proposed ground floor elevation of Collins Park Place project to base flood plus
three feet;
2) Accept the concept of Collins Park Place presented by the architect incorporating the raised
floor of BFE plus three feet; and,
3) Refer the recommendation of establishing a base flood elevation plus three feet as the
required criteria for all new and remodel residential and commercial buildings to the Land
Use Committee for further consideration.
645
Commission Memorandum -Accepting the recommendation of the Flooding Mitigation Committee
Page 2 of 4
The Municipal Code for the City of Miami Beach, under Sections 54-3't to 54-58, governs the
setting of the finish floor for all new construction. The State of Florida, under F.S. 166 also
authorizes the City to establish their own finished floor elevations to promote health, safety and
general welfare.
The recommendation for the first floor elevation to be set at BFE +3 feet is consistent with the
state's building code and ASCE 24, lnternational Building Code (lTB) and lRC.
This will have an impact on new residential construction by requiring additional fill for slab on
grade construction, or stem wall construction or structure on pilings. Each residential lot will
have to prevent stormwater runoff to the adjacent properties or to the City right-of-way by having
a berm or wall at the minimum elevation to prevent runoff off site. The land development code
may have to be revised to limit the size of structures on lots and to limit the pervious/impervious
surface ratio.
COLLINS PARK PLACE
After the presentation, the Committee recommends raising the proposed ground floor elevation
of Collins Park Place project to base flood plus three feet and accepting the concept of Collins
Park Place as presented by the architectural firm, incorporating the raised floor of BFE plus
three feet
The proposed ground floor retail spaces for Collins Park Place, as currently designed, are set
between 5.70 NAVD and 6.55 NAVD. Base Flood Elevation is 6.54 NAVD, while the existing
sidewalk elevations range between 4.22 NAVD - 5.50 NAVD. ln order to comply with the
requirement to raise the ground finish floor elevation to Base Flood plus three feet (9.54 NAVD),
the new finish floor elevation will need to be set al 4.04ft to 5.32ft higher than the existing
sidewalk.
The design team has developed a preliminary concept that resolves this challenge by elevating
the entire site and gradually sloping the sidewalk along Park Avenue and 23'd Street to meet the
required finish floor elevation. This solution preserves the natural pedestrian flow into each retail
space as well as egress from adjacent buildings, while still accommodating ADA requirements
throughout. The concept was presented and approved by the Flooding Mitigation Committee on
May 15,2014.
CONCLUSION
The Administration recommends approving the Resolution and accepting the recommendations
of the Flooding Mitigation Committee.
rLMtMflfleJBAMlDS/FRS
T:\AGENDA\2014Uune\Flooding mitigation recommendation.docx
646
647
Policy Review: Chanqe of Cround Floor FFL to BFE+Z or +3 CURRENTDEStcNCase 5Iud5t Muy,r4.ror4 EXrsrNc srrE coNDrroNs23HD STRFFTLIBRARYLOADINGACCESSNA'JA,-no-='l-Ln!./DEN- 4TFANCE l'n-ri:'! -f+4.0TUJlrt IEof-=ZEpc'!clmE3@mTDOWS(@+7.5NAVDlzNOTE:BASF FIOOD ELEVATION ESTABLISHED FOB THE PROJECT S1TE lS r6.45" NAVD.ALL NAVD ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THIS DIAGRAM AS PEB SURVEYld :.' t,.!,i!,i/,r',1l,li!:1 airl L,r"- C > ilivoEN-DOW(O+7DNr6 0SETBACK TINE':..,, , :; 'r,\ _@N+IIll Irr,-r__ffir-r-\-+, BALLET rl'!)l:+pU. ooonWlNDOWSTIIGA8 NAVD APPBOXWINDOWSaO+6.5 NAVD APPROXMIAMI BEACH REGIONAL LIBRARYrE-::*-toi22ND STBEETlllrPlornedPr,ogle"s;648
Policy Review: Change of Cround Floor FFL lo BFE+2 or +3Case 5tud5r Muy14.aci4EXTEND STAIBSAND AMEND LAYOUTFOR ACCESS TO B.O.H-tl r.li-NAJJAIT(\,+(Ln!./DnuItilEortrz!n6Inrl.t=F=IDm:EL!:)zSTRATEGY 1 / BFE+2RAISING RETAIL FFL ONLY - STRATECY NOT RECOMMENDEDLEVEL CHANGEWITHIN RETAIL SPACEEXTEND STATRS 23BD STREET22ND STREETADJUSTFEATURE STAIR &LANDINGCOLUMNSTALLER+4.ONAVDM!AMI BEACH REGIONAL LIBRARY22722nd.STBEEI-'r,i -.illq..,_1,_i,lDIAGRAM . FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PUBPOSES ONLY LAYOUTS TO BE ADJUSTED/ Rt-DESIGNED.ALL NAVD ELEVAT ONS SIIOWN IN THIS DIAGNAM AS PFR SI]RVFYCb ..',.'.r l;-"1t'*: !f!! RAISED AREASPlorredProgr,e,g;649
Policy Review: Change of Ground Floor FFL io BFE+2 or +3Case Sludy Mry14,ro14EXTEND STAIRSAND AMEND LAYOUTFOB ACCESS TO B.O,H.No,7o,IA'dn!.oaUIillJilEortrzB!xcr)fcrmtu,mIlzcc#STRATEGY 1 / BFE+3RAISING RETAIL FFL ONLY - STRATECY NOT RECOMMENDEDLEVEL CHANGEWITHIN RETAIL SPACE23BD STREETCOLUMNSTALLERADJUSTFEATURE SIAIR SLANDINGEXTEND STAIRSrii.-i-22ND STHEETNOTE:DIAGRAM FOF ILTUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY LAYOUTS TO BE ADJUSTED/ RE DESIGNED.ALL NAVD ELEVAI ONS SHOWN IN THIS DIAGRAM AS PER SUBVEY+4.0NAVDIIC FAISED AREASI EXTENDED RAMPSlllllll rxreruoro sratns..t--_650
Policy Review: Change ot Ground Floor FFL lo BFE+Z u, *3 ar*orao",CaSe 5lUd5f irl*.v1rr.r01,i coMBtNATtoNoFRAtstNcstTEANDLANDSCApEDGRADTNG-RECSMMENDED'TRATE.'No,JA'IOJA-LLn7.oLAtt--1Ertrz.oTn)Jclmt3u,mIii-z?ON.STREET PARKINGTO BE ADJUSTED23BD STBEEToooooo-.,!-.1 l-- , i 1. '1 ' - --) -:,1-lLl,LANI]SCAPED GRAD NG REOUIRES STEIPER StOPES.DRAINAGE DESIGN TO BE STUDIED IN DETAIL,GUTTEBS AND BE I EN I ION WALLS TO BE COORDINATID ACCORDINGIYr4.l-jMIAMI BEACH REGIONAL LIBRARY227 22nd STREETlINOTE:DIAGRAM FOR ILLUSTBATIVE PURPOSES ONLY LAYOUTS TO BE ADJUSTED/ RE.DESIGNEDALL NAVD ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THIS DIAGBAM AS PER SURVEYtr'{ RAISED ABEAS651
r33U15 oUEa hl2_rlq\.f&Az:Jo,tli!I.-rlhtl.rIo;'1#fuTr$,.1:11)N652
aIt:rlljr.653
Policy Review: Change of 6round Floor FFL to BFE+Z or +3Case 5tudy Mry14.2o14STRATEGY 2LAN DSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:BFE+2OF CARTO MAIINCLINATIONTRY RAMP\trN BETATLRAISED TOSIDEWALKCLEABrf,rJrOuCSTAIR ACCESS[ON.STREET PARKINGTO BE ADJUSTEDILANDSCAPE REOUIRES RE-DESIGN -INCLUDING ALLOWING FOR OUTDOORSEATING/ DINING AREAEXISTING BETAININGWALL TO REMAINFO BE ADJUSTED]ADAPT TO RE-DESIGNEDMAII\frAlN EXISTINGACCESS TO LIBRARY6 t,i rL l,..'! r it !: A /- t-"1!7 J I 'i:LANDSCAPED GRADING REOUINfS STEEPER SLOPES -OBAINAGE DESIGN TO BE STUDIED IN DETAIL,GUTTERS AND RETENTION WALLS TO BE COOBDINATED ACCONDINGLYLOADINGLANDSCAPEPlornedProgr ,Eg654
Policy Review: (hange of Ground Flooi FFL to BFE+Z or +3Case Sludy Msy14,zo14STRATEGY 2LANDSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:BFE+3OF CABINCLINATIONTRY RAMPNN RETAILBAISED TOSIDEWALKPLANTERS+GUABDFAILSt)',t]uEoi:TO MACLEARSTAIR ACCESSION-STREET PABKINGTO BE ADJUSTEDID(ISTING RETAININGWALL TO REMAINrTO BE ADJUSTED]LANDSCAPE REOUIRES RE.DESIGN .INCLUDING ALLOWING FOR OUTDOOR6.ratg reruorruc SEAT|NG/ DtNtNG AREAADAPI TO BE-DESIGNEDLANDSCAPED GRADING FEOUIRES STEEPER SLOPES -DRAINAGE DESIGN TO 8E STUDIED IN DETAIL,GUTTERS AND RETENTION WALLS TO BF COOBDINATED NCCORD NGLYflA,I'VTAIN EXISTINGACCESS TO LIBRARYLOADINGDSCAPE655
Policy Revlew: fhange of Cround Floor FFL lo BFE+2 or +3Case Studyr Mu5,14, io14STRATEGY 2LANDSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:BfE+2-r,b ., . ' , 11, "1r*i iPITRANSITION FROM RAISED TO EXISTING SIDEWALK AT CORNER OF 23RD SIREET AND PARK AVENUE656
Policy Review: Change of 6round Floor FFL lo BFE+Z or +3Case Slud5l Mdy14,2o14STRATEGY 2LANDSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:BFE+3& t,.,,:. :r..ri *::i.t-i-.iTRANSITION FROM RAISED TO EXISTING SIDEWALK AT CORNER OF 23RD STREEI AND PARK AVENUEPlonredProgre,gs657
Policy Review: Change ol Ground Floor FFL Io BFE+2 or +3Case Stud5l Fr;ry14, ?e14STFATEGY 2LANDSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:BFE+2TRANSITION FROM RAISED TO EXISTING SIDEWALK IN COMBINATION WITH LANDSCAPE GRADING658
Policy Review: Change of Cround Floor FFL to BFE+2 or +3Case Siudy uay14.2014STSATEGY 2LANDSCAPE,/ STREETSCAPE:BFE+3@ $,r:,Lr'111;,7i111TRANSITION FROM RAISED TO EXISTING SIDEWALK IN COMBINATION WITH LANDSCAPE GRADINGPlornedPrcgle,,pg659
Policy Review: Change of Cround Floor FFL to BFE+Z or +3Case SI'ud5r Mayi4. 2014STRATEGY 2LAN DSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:AFE+2l:: " " " " "--r,EDOenlooooool!0Eooootr+'\b:.'..'ti t\i-i !-PlornedProgrc,*660
Policy Review: Change of Cround Floor FFL Io BFE+z or +3Case 5tud5l Miry14,?014STRATEGY 2LANDSCAPE/ STREETSCAPE:BFE+3::::::::::::::::lD , .-{i- r. i- i-iPlorredPrcgrc;;661
SSel6et6pawop.,-.i;.. L"-i]- : .' QlrD$xt'a662
i3a6or6pa.uo16-\ti.ii,'-il , ED,',..',., {p1";S BSp)punoJD lo a5uEqJ :Mer^au /btlod663
33e,rEor4cauo6'l:i:,'-irl l :')'(DILUol(]c(u6:c!zfJcHEl,.lft:::664
iCdi6ot6pawop,.,.'-.41-1..,:''1,.!lil ;':i: i/r (DIUJc0-ELUIJctslf.iZ:JCHEOl*:J:665
---"44n?en666
iseiSor6palo;4,-, "--1 i (D667
Policy Review: Change of Ground Floor FFL to BFE+Z or +3Case Study i,.Eyi4.eo14CONDITIONS - CUBBENT. BFE+2 AND +3ADAPTATION OF GROUND FLOOR FFLNo,-JIo,c!il:;onl./lTutlrrlEar-trz'o!c|f,lCIm3t=@mfBASE FLOOD ELEVATION ESTABLISHED FOR THE PROJECT SITE lS +6.45" NAVD.CURRENT STRATEGYiO STOREFRONT FULL HEIGHT GLAZING FOR HIGH-END RETAIL AND FOOD+BEVERAGEo PROVIDE FLOOD PANELLING SYSTEIV]o FFlls FOLLOW CROWN OF ISLOPINGI BOAD - PLUS 4" FOR GOOD PRACTICE.BFE+2':FFL CHANGES TO +8.45' NAVDl= +2.75'lBFE+3':FFL CHANGES TO +9.45' NAVDt= +3.75'lRAISE BUILDING TO MAINTAINCLEAR HEIGHTS IN RETAIL SPACES:BFE+Z': +2.75'BFE+3': +& i, 'i L r,i ll.ti:,1,/':iPlorredPr.ogre,5.F668
Policy Review: Change of 6round Floor FFL io BFE+2 or +3#+?ir?'$t)+ B FE+ 2 AN D +3CURRENT CONDITION:o STEPPED GROUND FLOOR SLABo FFL,S FOLLOW CROWN OF ISLOPING] BOAD PLUS 4" FOB GOOD PRACTICE,o PBOVIDE FLOOD PANELLING SYSTEM- * CURBENT DESIGN LEVELSRETAILZONESB&CRETAIL ZONE ANA,7o,In,+o-n{.onmILilEIortrz.ltrnxoI6m35@mfGROUND FLOOR AT BFE+2:o SLAB NOT STEPPINGo BUILDING MOVES UP 2,75, TO MAINTAIN CEILING HEIGHTGROUND FLOOR AT BFE+3:o ,SLAB NOT STEPPINGo BUILDING MOVES UP 3,75, TO MAINTAIN CEILING HEIGHTVARIES MIN 1 1'NOTE:CURRENT DES GN DIAGRAMS NOT TO SCALE FOB lLLUSTRAT]VE PURPOSES ONLY669
Policy Review: Change of Cround Floor FFL to BFE+Z or +3Case SIudy r4*y14.2014CTIRRENTNA,7o,IA}7'!.rDnt,;EilEorrzEEn)oclm3G'mICONDITIONS: STFATEGY 182 - BFE-2TYPICAL SECTION AT RETAILSTRATEGY 1STRATEGY 28FE+2'AFECURRENTOESIGN LEVELr '. a ----- f a0'00'NAVOI a^rsel sto.*^.- jLEVEL CHANGE WTHIN RETAIL SPACE:+ SIDEWALK MAINTAINED AS EXISTING. LOSS OF WNDOW DISPLAY AREA. RETA L EACADE REQUIRES RE.DESIGN- LOSS OF RETAIL FLOOR AREA DUE TO RAII4PS ANO STAIRSASCEND AND DESCEND BETWEEN RETAIL UNITS. . STAIR/ RAMP REOI] RED FOR EACH RETAIL tINTNOTE:CURBENT DESIGN DIAGRAMS NOT TO SCALE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLYLEVEL CHANGE AT SIDEWALK:+ LEVELAPPROACH BETWEEN RETAIL UNITS+ NO LOSS OF WNDOW DISPLAYAREA+ RETA]L FACADE DESIGNAS CURRENT+ NEW TANDSCAPED WALKWAYREDUCED SHOP VISIE L TY FROM STREET LEVEL. ASCENDAND DESCEND RAISED SIDEWALKAT F XED POINTS" PEDESTRIAN THROUGH TRAFFIC I\,IUST ASCEND TO WALKWAYlD 1,: ; i r:.,r, *.[,4 i'],.:PlorredProgr-e*s670
Policy Review: Change of Ground Floor FFL lo BFE+2 or +3Case Study Mtsy14.e014Nt\,7oIo*CLn:;onUTT[:,1l.r IEortrz1fl>nxo!..lm3=80m:ECONDITIONS: STRATEGY 1 S 2 - BFE+3TYPICAL SECTION AT RETAILSTRATEGY 1STRATEGY 2EXISTINGRETAIL UNITO LEVELSRAILINGBFE+3BFECIJRRENTLEVEL CHANGE wlTHIN RETAIL SPACE:+ SIDEWALK MA NTAINED AS EXISTING. LOSS OF WNDOWDISPLAY AREA- RETAIL FACADE REQUIRES RE.DESIGNLOSS OF RETAIL FLOOR AREA DUE TO RAMPS AND STA RSASCENDAND DESCEND AETWEEN RETAIL UNITS. STAIR/ RAMP REOUIRED FOR EACH RETA]L UNITNOTE:CUBHENI DESlGN DIAGRAMS NOT TO SCN LE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PUBPOSES ONLYLEVEL CHANGE AT SIDEWALK:+ LEVELAPPROACH BETWEEN RETAIL UNITS+ NO LOSS OF WNDOW DISPLAYAREA+ RETAIL FACAoE DESIGNAS CURRENT+ NEWLANDSCAPEO WALKWAY- REDUCED SHOP VISIBILITY FROM STREET LEVEL. ASCENDAND DESCEND RAISED SIDEWALKAT FIXED PO NTS. PEDESTRIAN THROUGH TRAFFIC MUST ASCEND TO WALKWAY671
Policy Review: Change of Ground Floor FFL to BFE+Z or +lCase 5l'ud5r ivray j4, zor4CONDITIONS - CURRENT, BFE+2 AND +3CAR ENTRY RAMP/ 5PACES BELOWENTRY RAMP DIAGRAMMATIC SECTION - CURRENT DESIGN+22 20NA,JA,Io,*a-n{.onUITt!:Jl..lEortrz1f,EclEC]mEECEmTSTEEPER RAMPINCLINATIONENTRY BAMP DIAGBAMMATIC SECTION - RAISED GROUND FLOOR FFL TO BFE+2'*.;,: - -! KtrcHtN tJi srosaceI AREAFSTEEPER RAMPINCLINATIONNOTE:* * CURRENT DESIGN DIAGRAMS NOT TO SCALE . FOB ILLUSTNATIVE PURPOSIS ONLYJ.-*--i r ili.fioI KITCHEN II STORAGEENTRY RAMP DIAGRAMMATIC SECTION - FAISED GROUND FLOOB FFL TO BFE+3'PlornedPrcgre,.r;672
Policy Review: Change of Ground Floor FFL to BFE+2 or +3Case 5lud1r &1ay14,i014IM PACTCONSULTANT WORK AFFECTED & CO5T IMPLICATIONNtU7o,I(1,+c\n7.t/lTLUHortrZ-\lnxntrlomtu,mnIBUDGETl COST IMPLICATIONITEMS INCLUDING BUT NOT LII\4ITED TOo ADDITIONAL.,,o DRAINAGE PROVISIONSo RETAINING WALLSo STEM AND FOUNDATION WALLSo STEPS, MMPS, GUARDRAILSo FILLo PLANTERS AND VEGETATIONo PILE EXTENSIONSo PLUMBING EXTENSIONSo NEWCONNECTIONS TO EXISTING INFRASTRUCTUREWATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL]UNFORESEEN CONDITIONSOVERHEAD&PROFITCONTINGENCYCONSULTANT WORK AFFECTEDITEI\,1S INCLUDING BUT NOT LIN4ITED TO:STRUCTURAL ENGINEERo SLAB ON GRADEo FOUNDATIONS/ PILINGo COLUI,NSo VOLUMEo STAIRS, RAMPSo STOREFRONT INTERFACEo RETAINING WALLSBUILDING DESIGNo SIDEWALKSo STOREFRONT INTERFACEo GROUND FLOOR LAYOUTSo PLAZA GRADjNGo PLAZA INTERFACE WTH EXISTING BUILDINGSo STAIR EXTENSIONSo COLUMNSISTAIRS, RAMPS, ELEVATORSIo CAR ENTRY RA[,PCOST CONSULTANTo ADDED SCOPEo ADDED VOLUI,EMEP/ FIRE CONSULTANTo PLUIVIBINGEXTENSIONSLANDSCAPE DESIGNo HARDSCAPE PL,AZA+ LIBERry AVEo SIDEWALKSo PLANTERSCIVIL ENGINEERo GRADINGo PLAZA+SIDEWALKDMINAGEo UNDERGROUND STREET UTlLlw CONNECTIONSlD .. ;. , rir .{ :!oooPlo673
RESOLUTION TO BE SUBMITTED
674
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
675