C6D-Report- Neighborhood-Community Affair Committee Meeting On June 27 2014&
.!:::!t-
. f'1 i''. d "'* ,
Li l" ,3, i iJ
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
To: Mayor Philip Levine and Members
FROM: Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 23,2014
SUBJECT: REPORT OFTHE NEIGHBOR
FRIDAY, June27,2014.
MUNTTY AFFATRS COMMTTTEE (NCAC) FOR
A meeting of the Neighborhood/Community Affairs Committee was held on Friday, June
27 ,2014 at 3:00pm in the Commission Chamber, 3rd Floor of City Hall. Commissioners in
attendance: Commissioners Micky Steinberg, Deede Weithorn and Ed Tobin. Members
from the Administration and the public were also in attendance. Please see the attached
sign-in sheet.
THE MEETING OPENED AT 3:01 P.M.
OtD BUS,,VESS
1. Discussion Regarding Bicycle Parking Locations And Adding Attractive Bike Racks
Throughout The Gity. 3:49
Commission ltem C4H, April23,2014
(Requested by the Transpoftation Depaftment)
Jose Gonzalez, Transportation Director presented the item.
On October 17,2007 , the Miami Beach City Commission adopted the Atlantic Greenway Network
(AGN) Master Plan also known as the Bike Master Plan. This master plan was focused on internal
connectivity for bicycles by way of a continuous network of on-street bicycle facilities, shared-paths,
Beachwalks, and Baywalks, and creating connections between the City network and the County's
and State regional bicycle network. As an outcome of the AGN Master Plan, the City has constructed
over 15 miles of bicycle facilities and has more miles in construction or design stages. As part of this
bicycle network construction, the City has continued the phased construction of Beachwalks and has
installed bicycle parking throughout the City. These existing facilities amount to about 70 percent of
the bicycle facilities planned in 2007 .
The increase in bicycling from the recreational and transportation standpoints has generated a higher
demand for bicycle parking citywide. ln response to requests from residents on the demand for
bicycle parking, in May 2010 the City retained The Corradino Group to conduct field reconnaissance
and a detailed investigation of various areas within Miami Beach, in an effort to identify suitable
locations for the implementation of bicycle racks. Following were the designated transportation
corridors:
. Washington Avenue (from 4th Street to 1Sth Street)
. Collins Avenue (from 5th Street to 23rd Street)
. Alton Road (from Sth Street to 23rd Street)
. Collins Avenue (from 23rd Street to 28th Street)
. Ocean Drive (from South Pointe Drive to 1Sth Street)
A comprehensive report was prepared for each of the five areas described above and included side
streets as necessary, based on site conditions. The proposed locations were coordinated with
business/property owners. Bike racks proposed on state roads were coordinated with the Florida
Agenda ltem C6D
Date z-23-//
City
337
Department of Transportation (FOOT) so that permits could be obtained. A total of 165 additional
bike racks were recommended as part of this work. Since the completion of The Corradino Group
assessment, bike racks have already been installed on public right-of-way and parks. The City's GIS
Division has developed an inventory of the location of existing bike racks (AttachmentA). According
to this inventory, there are currently 524 bike racks available citywide. The City of Miami Beach
standard bike rack design is an inverted U shape as shown in the picture below. The cost each of
these bike racks with installation is approximately $400.
ln March 2011, the City's Planning Department developed the Miami Beach Bicycle Parking
Guidelines. Through the development review process, the City works with applicants to include
bicycle parking as part of site design, encouraging the ability to provide for long term (i.e. bike
lockers, multi-level bicycle racks) and short term (bike racks) parking. Long-term bicycle parking
provides employees, students, residents, commuters and others who generally stay at a site for
several hours a secure and weather-protected place to park bicycles. The measure of security for
long-term bicycle parking must be greaterthan that provided by short-term parking. Furthermore, the
City encourages development applicants to include Transportation Demand Management (TOM)
programs with the purpose of incentivizing employees to utilize alternative modes of transportation
other than driving to work. The specific TOM program is administered by a designated staff person
on site and monitors the implementation of TOM measures, such as utilization of bicycles as a mode
of transportation. The Bicycle Parking Guidelines have been a great asset in expanding the abilityto
provide for bicycle parking and to encourage employees that work at commercial establishments as
well as visitors in the City to utilize the bicycle as a mode of transportation.
The location of greatest need in excess of what has been provided is Washington Avenue south of
Lincoln Road. Bicycle corrals and a bicycle station will be considered along this corridor. An important
consideration in the future is to try to include long term bicycle parking (bike lockers) in City-owned
parking garages by car sharing locations and by major transit stops. The objective would be to
compliment other modes including car share service. For people that do not own cars or simply prefer
to ride their bicycles to destinations, they could easily ride a bike to a transit stop or parking garage,
parkthe bicycle in a secured bike locker and then access a rentalvehicle. This option would assist in
diminishing congestion in the City by encouraging people to ride their bikes to nearby destinations in
lieu of driving.
A public workshop on the Bicycle Master Plan Update was held on May 13, 2014. Through public
input received during the workshop as well as subsequent data gathering and evaluation, other
methods or designs of bicycle parking may be recommended, depending on location and intensity of
use. The City has approximately $120,000 previously appropriated and worked for additional bicycle
parking to be deployed throughout the City.
Commissioner Weithorn- not sure there is anything to say. lf there is a budgetary impact there needs
to be enough time to bring it into budget considerations. Two important aspects of this are the
locations of the bike racks, the locations need to be near streetlights and secure locations, and the
design of the bike racks function well with U-locks.
NO ACTION TAKEN.
2. Discussion Regarding Bicyclist Safety Campaign With The Miami Beach Police
Department, Deco Bikes And Local Bicycle Rental Companies.3:56pm
Commission ltem C4Q, February 6, 2013
(Requested by Commissioner Weithorn)
Jose Gonzalez, Transportation Director & John Buhrmaster (Assistant Chief of Police) presented
the item.
Miami Beach has historically been one of the premier cities for bicycle transportation in South Florida.
ln 2013, based on 2010 US Census data, the City ranked tenth in the list of cities in the United States
where people are most likely to use bicycles to commute to work. This national recognition is
substantiated by the results of the City's Community Satisfaction Survey which documented that, in
338
2012, 11o/o of residents eitherwalked or used a bicycle as their primary mode of transportation. ln the
South Beach area, this figure rose to 260/o.The Community Satisfaction Survey further reflects that
48o/o of residents would be willing to use a bicycle as an alternative to a car. This figure is significantly
higher than the 17o/o repofted in 2009. By way of context, the national average for commuter bicycle
trips is 0.56% and the figure is even lower for Miami-Dade County.
As a result of the number of cyclists currently traveling on the City's streets, sidewalks, and
pedestrian pathways, the number of conflicts, violations, and accidents has become a source of
concern for the City Commission and residents. The Commission directed staff to embark on a
bicycle safety campaign with the goal of reducing the number of accidents and conflicts between
motor vehicles and bicycles by educating motorists and bicyclists on traffic laws.
Staff research indicated that 184 accidents involving bicycles occurred from 2010 to 2012. From
these accidents, the City of Miami Beach Police Department cited 66% of motorists as being at fault.
When these accidents are broken down by residency, 50o/o of all accidents involved motorists that
are non-Miami Beach residents, 13% involved Miami Beach resident motorists and37o/o are Miami
Beach resident cyclists. Research also strongly suggests that bicycle accidents involving vehicles
peak during our Major Events Periods (MEP), between December and March.
At the July 29, 2013 Neighborhood/Community Affairs Committee (NCAC) meeting, the Committee
passed a motion directing the Administration to develop a Bicycle Safety Plan and referred the item
to the Bicycle Committee for discussion and to return to the NCAC with a recommendation and an
outline of the proposed Bicycle Safety Campaign. lt is worth noting that the City has conducted
bicycle safety campaigns in recent years, some in partnership with the Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT) and the Universig of Miami BikeSafe Program.
At the December 11,2013 City Commission meeting, the Commission approved an agreementwith
the University of South Florida (USF) Board of Trustees for the USF's Center for Urban
Transportation Research to fund a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety High Visibility (HVE) Enforcement
Campaign in the amount of $88,920 which provides funding for police overtime and extra details. The
contract was executed on March 18,2014 and the campaign was launched by the Miami Beach
Police Department.
The purpose of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety (HVE) program is to improve pedestrian and
bicyclist safety. The goal of this program is to reduce the incidence of crashes involving pedestrians
and bicyclists and the resulting fatalities and injuries throughout the City of Miami Beach. The
program will also support research and education efforts to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety
throughout South Florida, in partnership with the Centerfor Urban Transportation Research (CUTR)
at the University of South Florida, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT). The MBPD
will be coordinating the assembling and presentation of data with these institutions. Attachment B
shows the Enforcement Detail Documentation from March 7,2014 through May 1 ,2014.
The primary focus of this program will be on areas experiencing disproportionately high pedestrian
and bicycle crashes, and surrounding facilities such as schools. These arethe same areas identified
as part of the City's overall Bicycle Safety Campaign.
Currently, the City is implementing the following measures as part of the Bicycle Safety Campaign,
also as part of Attachment C:
. Parking meter receipts
' Bicycle safety messages from past e-newsletters in English/Spanish from the past three months.
Please note, we've been including bike safety messages since last year
. MB magazine mention, winter 2014
. PSA bike safety link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= 0 Xt ob3Q
. Twitter account for bike safety messages: https://twitter.com/MiamiBeachNews
Commissioner Weithorn- lnquired if the discussion can be held, once that has finished Commissioner
Steinberg will adjourn the meet, and then the bicycle safety campaign video can be watched.
339
Commissioner Weithorn -Stated that the statistics presented by John Buhrmaster prove that people
are most frightened of vehicles.
John Buhrmaster-Stated that the numbers provided are only a representation of the individuals he
has been able to cite.
Commissioner Weithorn- Stated that 50% of the problem is motorists and pedestrians and cyclists
seem split. lnquired if the statistics John Buhrmaster presented could be sent out via an LTC.
John Buhrmaster -Stated that from 2005 to 2013 there was an average of 6 fatalities a year;
currently there are none this year, none of which concerned a bicycle. There were two pedestrian
fatalities.
Commissioner Weithorn-Stated that the best thing to do is to continue to get the word out regarding
bicycle safety.
Jose Gonzalez- State that the enforcement for this initiative is currently funded through FDOT. That
grant expiries in August, but the Police Department is currently in the process of applying for the
grant for a second time.
NO ACTION TAKEN
,vEt/yBusr rEss
3. Discussion Regarding The PossibilityOf The ParksAnd Recreation DepartmentPartnering
With Miami-Dade County Schools To Operate An After School Program Out Of The City's
Local Schoo! Sites. 3:34pm
Commission ltem C4H May 21,2014
(Requested by Patus & Recreation)
John Rebar, Parks and Recreation Director
One of the core functions of the City's Parks and Recreation Department is offering after-school and
summer programs for grade school children. The Parks and Recreation Department provides
transportation from all Miami Beach schools to the City's parks where these programs are offered.
Miami-Dade County Schools has expressed interest in partnering with the City to offer after-school
programming at the City's local school sites. The idea would be to implement a pilot program at
Nautilus Middle School at the beginning of the 2014-2015 school year. The Administration seeks
direction from the Committee regarding this matter.
John Rebar- Stated that historically the Parks and Recreation Department is very involved in child
care services. Due to so many child care services, other residents tend to complain because the
limited parks and facilities are constantly in use for these child care services. Schools are already
offering after school care programs and often the department is competing with them. Stated the
conversation that needs to be had, is does the City want to get out of child care and start partnering
with schools, and then use the funding that was allocated to these programs, to maintaining and
enhancing the City's facilities. Stated that Administration is suggesting taking the teen program to
them at the Nautilus Middle School. This would not require a budget increase.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that the City's Parks Department is one of the most important
departments in the City and he does not want to give up responsibility to another other organization.
lf this is something that is going to enhance what the City does and provides better service, than it is
something to push forward with.
John Rebar -Stated that the option presented is a true partnership. City staff would use the Nautilus
Middle School facilities to run the programs. There would also be tutoring programs available for no
additionalcost.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that he did not see this as a major policy shift.
Commissioner Weithorn- Stated the shift is that it is usually a pure recreational program or a pure
enhancement program, but this would be the first time that the two are combined. Stated that itwould
be nice for parents and students to have a combination of both.
Commissioner Tobin- !nquired if John Rebar could assign someone to this new venture to ensure
that it is being executed correctly.
Commissioner Weithorn- lnquired when could this start to be implemented.
John Rebar- Stated that it could be in place at the beginning of the school year.
340
Commissioner Steinberg-lnquired what age gt:oup this program would target.
John Rebar - Stated that it would cover 6th -8th grade.
John Rebar- Stated that allthe Miami Beach principals are on board to do this. There is a program in
Muss Park that has been run for years, but it has its challenges. Blocks away, the City is competing
with another after school care program. The principal would be more than happy to receive our
children. This would be relinquishing our responsibilities to North Beach Elementary, since they will
now be part of their program, not ours. The City would not be sending staff over to run the program.
The rates would be increased to $8.00 a day, $7.00 a day if the child qualifies for free or reduced
lunch. This is an increase from the City's programs. There is a fee difference and the burden would
be on the residents. Stated that he recommends a fee waiver system for those who are in need.
Commissioner Steinberg-Stated that it is too much money for some of the City's residents.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that the City needs to provide first class service to the residents that pay
a significant amount of money in property taxes. The guiding principle should be, is this an
enhancement for the residents.
John Rebar- Stated that he does believe it will be quality a quality program. Stated that Administration
has been looking at budget saving, as this is the will of the Commission, this would free up the parks.
The win for the residents is quality programs at the schools and quality parks for the residents.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that these two programs are already available and residents make a
choice.
John Rebar- Stated that as it stands today, the residents do make a choice between the two
programs.
Commissioner Tobin- lnquired than why would the City close the park option and only give residents
one option.
John Rebar- Stated that the main reason is to free up the parks.
Commissioner Tobin-lnquired what Administration would like to do.
John Rebar- Stated that he brought this before the Committee to see if there was a desire to pursue
this as an option.
Commissioner Steinberg- lnquired if this includes the 4 elementary schools participating.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that he would like to keep it the way it is and give residents an option.
Commissioner Steinberg- Stated that it is important to give residents a choice but maybe giving them
more of a choice could alleviate some of the parks. lt is worth discussing further. Would be happy to
sit down and discuss the options.
Commissioner Weithorn -Stated that right now residents have a choice between the school
programs and the ones provided bythe City. lf the two choices are combined, doesn'tthattake away
the parents decision in which program to place their child in. That is the major concern.
Commissioner Steinberg- Stated that she is not in favor of taking the choice away from the residents.
Commissioner Steinberg-lnquired that could the summer camp that is in Muss Park use North Beach
Elementary on day that has bad weather.
John Rebar- Stated that the elementary schools aren't available for rent or use.
NO ACTION TAKEN
4. Discussion Regarding Altos De! Mar Master Plan. 3:01pm
Commission ltem C4A, June 11,2014
(Requested by Parks & Recreation)
John Rebar, Parks and Recreation Director
Altos Del Mar Park is located between 77th Street on the north, 76th Street on the south, Collins
Avenue on the west and the Beachwalk on the east and contains approximately 2.5 acres. The
City contracted with AECOM Technical Services to develop a master plan for the park. The key
issues as described in the scope of services included:. The development of an appropriate range of spaces and facilities for general and passive
recreation, such as, open play areas (non-lighted and lighted), walking paths, landscape
areas, etc.;o Performance area with possible movable stage;. Opportunities and constraints for the park presented by the adjacent public library and. parking lot property;
341
. Accessibility for the surrounding neighborhood via street end connectivity to existing
Beachwalk; and. Provide input for arts in public place initiatives (art works by others).
Upon execution of the agreement, City officials and Parks and Recreation representatives
determined that it would be prudent to delay the actual project start date until the end of calendar
year 2013 such that all residents, both year-round and seasonal, would be available for participation
in the stakeholder workshop approach to be deployed by the consultant team. Parks and Recreation
leadership assembled the consultant team for an internal workshop on December 13, 2013, in order
to provide overview guidance and the establishment of City goals and objectives. With this
information and directives in-hand, the consultant team began their initial project due-diligence, site
analysis and opportunities and constraints analysis of the subject property and its outlying areas.
Several team meetings were conducted on-site where representatives from the City Manager's
Office, Police Department, Planning and Zoning and Parks & Recreation provided input and
guidance.
The consultant team then began the process of organizing a series of interactive public workshops to
gain input from the stakeholders and concerned citizens and to develop the overall goals and
objectives for the park from the neighbors and potential park users. Three interactive workshops
were conducted as follows;
1. Stakeholder Goals and Objectives and park program elements, February 27,2014.
This first session was held with approximately 40 citizens and was intended to familiarize the
stakeholders with the inherent attributes of the park, its potential for development, discussions
concerning 'active and passive' uses and the overall development of potential program elements that
would be used in the next session of concerning development alternatives exploration. The overall
consensus was that this park should be passive and should be designed as a neighborhood park (vs
community or regional park). lncreasing user safety was a primary consideration for the future park
design.
2. Development Alternatives Exploration, May 1, 2014.
The second workshop was attended by approximately 30 citizens and the consultantteam presented
three alternative plans; Alternative 1 was summarized as a more formal Beaus Art style layout with
native plantings in a traditional Florida hammock style such as one might find at Fairchild Gardens.
Alternative 2 was expressed as the "Great Lawn" solution and featured native plantings with a
substantial lawn area tilted up towards the dune highpoint. Alternative 3 featured a more avant-
garde approach with a sweeping wall that separated the park from the dune and featured a bridge
element to connect the main park to a beach observation platform. The workshop ended in an
interactive voting exercise with the Stakeholders voting unanimously for Alternative 1.
3. Preferred Alternative Presentation, June 10, 2014.
This workshop was attended by 35 citizens and was conducted in an open house style so that
stakeholders could spend a considerable amount of time reviewing the preferred plan in an extensive
question and answer session. The consultant team stressed that it is critical that the stakeholders
clearly articulate their vision for the park, and that the park would be a phased over a period of time.
A final interactive session was conducted to determine the stakeholder priorities for 25 program
elements. Priorities were categorized as 1
tt, 2nd , 3'd , and voting tallies were recorded
Primary Challenges encountered during the master plan development efforts focused on the
inclusion of several"lighting rod" program elements including public restrooms, observation pavilion,
interactive fountain and sand volleyball courts. These elements were debated, both pro and con, at
virtually every workshop with citizens being fairly evenly split on all issues. The consultant team
developed a final plan that included all these elements; however, the team stressed that the master
plan is not directing that each of these elements be included in the final design and construction
plans, but if these elements are ultimately included in the park construction, the master plan has
appropriately located each element in the best possible area.
342
Solutions/Gonclusions of the consultant team, stakeholders and City representatives can be
generalized that this is the vision that the stakeholders, City staff and consultant team have crafted
together in a fair and democratic process. No one gets everything, everyone gets something. The
park features a safe and accessible public open space that is unique to this location, but is in
harmony with the high standards of quality demanded by the stakeholders, citizens and city
leadership of Miami Beach. The net result will offer a beautiful, safe and functional city park that
serves the residents, the visitors, the local food, retail and hotel establishments and will provide
people of all ages and abilities a new and exciting venue for enjoying the best that the City of Miami
Beach has to offer.
Commissioner Weithorn- lnquired if the City was still considering naming this area
Beachview Park. lnquired if this has been addressed
John Rebar - Stated that no it has not been addressed, however Administration does
know that name is desired.
Commissioner Weithorn -Stated that she prefers Beachview to Altos de Mar to go with the
spirit of North Beach.
Greg Alt (Vice President of AECOM) provided a presentation.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that he would like to take a vote of sentiment since this will
have to be presented to the entire Commission anyways.
Commissioner Tobin- lnquired what Administration would like from the Committee.
John Rebar- Stated that he would like to bring to Commission something that the
Committee agrees upon.
MOTION: by Commissioner Weithorn to move to Commission with positive
recommendation and to change the name officially to Beachview instead of Altos de Mar.
Ray Breslin (resident) spoke.
Seconded by Commissioner Steinberg
5. Discussion Regarding Rebuilding Of The Sunset 1 And 2 Guard Houses 3:22pm
Commission ltem C4A, May 21, 2014
(Requested by Commissioner Malakoff)
Maria Hernandez presented the item
The residents of Sunset lsland 1 & 2, through their homeowners association, have submitted the
attached request for the city's consideration. City staff, including the departments of Public Works,
Property Management, Planning, and the CityAttorney have had severaldiscussions and meetings
regarding the Sunset 1 & 2 guard house. Additionally, Maria Hernandez, Capital Projects Advisor,
has met with the homeowners association regarding the request.
The following are the conclusions those discussions which have been transmitted the
HOA:
Regarding Historic Designation:
1. The guardhouse is not a historic structure.
2. However, the guard house is in a locally designated Historic Site, i.e., the site which includes only
the historic bridge. (Refer to Exhibit 1)
3. Demolition of the structure would be required to go before the Historic Preservation
Board (HPB) because the guard house is within the (Bridge) historic site boundaries.
4. However, if a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) is issued by HPB, the guard house can be
demolished and rebuilt outside the boundaries of the historic site.
Design Review Board (ORB) approval is required for a new structure located outside of the historic
site boundaries.
5. Other changes to the guard house such as painting, new floors, awning additions, changes in
windows, etc., can be approved administrativelyduring the building permit process and do not require
ORB or HBP approval.
Regarding Ownership and Funding for Renovation:
343
1 . The City attorney has determined that there is no evidence that the guard house actually "belongs"
to the City.
2. The City attorney has also determined that, therefore, the Ci$ has no legalobligation to providefor
or assist with construction, operation or maintenance of the guard house, and if the City chooses to
do so, it is voluntary.
3. There is currently no funding appropriated to modify the guard house, as it is not in the current
2014 Capital budget.
Robert Hertzberg (President of the Homeowners Association for Sunset lsland 1 A 2)
presented.
Commissioner Weithorn-Stated that she does not feel the Committee can do anything
except receive more information. Stated that this Committee cannot make a financial
decision and that this issue should be brought to the Finance Committee. Also stated that
before making any decision, staff should bring more information regarding the legality
about doing something to a property that may or may not be ours.
Raul Aguila-Confirmed that what Robert had mentioned is correct. lt is oblique as to who
owns the guard house. Stated that the point in weighting in on the memorandum is so that
it is clear that any decision to fund the guard house would be voluntary and subject to the
discretion of the Commission. lnquired that going forward, would the Committee be more
comfortable on any type of notion that the City owns the guard house.
Commissioner Tobin- Stated that the City renovated the guard houses for Sunset lsland 3
and 4; therefore, it should have been expected that Sunset lsland 1 and 2 would also ask
the City to renovate their guard houses. Stated that this should be referred to the
Commission that the City can create a budget for it,
Commissioner Weithorn- Does not want an action to be taken on this item today because
this is the Neighborhood Committee, not the Finance Committee. This item should be
brought to the Capital Budget Finance Committee meeting.
Kathie Brooks- Stated that [he Capital Budget is discussedln mid- July, the 1 5h or the 16th.
Commissioner Weithorn- Stated that when the Capital Budget is discussed the entire
Commission is present and the items are looked at, and a decision is made. Stated that
this is where this item needs to be presented.
Commissioner Steinberg- Stated that it was a good thing that Commission Malakoff
referred this item because it did bring it attention to this matter.
Robert Hertzberg (President of the Homeowners Association for Sunset lsland 1 & 2)
spoke.
Commissioner Weithorn- Stated that on July 16th at 1:00 PM all the Capital Budget
requests are on the agenda.
Robert Hertzberg (President of the Homeowners Association for Sunset lsland 1 & 2)
spoke.
Commissioner Steinberg- Stated that Maria Hernandez does have the plans that were
used for Sunset 3 and 4 to go off of for Sunset I and 2.
Commissioner Weithorn- Urged Robert to sit with Maria Hernandez and discuss the guard
houses and to ensure that the vision that he has is in line with the plans Maria has so that
when the budget is discussed there isn't a shortage of funds.
NO ACTION TAKEN
MOTION: by Commissioner Steinberg to adjourn the meeting at 4:00pm
Seconded by Commissioner Weithorn.
344
J
=UJ
It
1
\j
cf
J\)
)
i.i
N
\.)\l
aqi
e_oo t
J
.o
\
.v
U
U\
a
q
(-.\
F
iL
.)
()
<.
v
r!
U
r
e_
.q.u
\J
c\\
F)\tr
^N
s
.$
o
.\{
s
\r'.
\
d
s
)<r.
[i,
Y4J
\1.
\t)$
a
r;\
t:
:
(,
'$
1!_
'T?
's
rSr)
|4
U
!r,
(
\_J-
)
['
,{
j
(
(
"{
t
'l
)
.o
,V"f-,J
d(
f-j-
d
=\)
)i
o\,lI
1
il
i
1q
$
dv\I
fr
q
t
>-L+
-+
a:
t
s
G
a
t
t
oz
IJJzo
J-
o-
t--sT--tl\t.
l)r\
..d
M
hI
vlaii(
l
rrli
tj
:
l
1J\
<)
!
a)
f^
\\
'\/s.
rt,
rF
\rt
\>,
O
I
'{a\
t\^
1')
v't
T\r\
JI
)
Y
r)t)(f)r\
CA\-'
,.)
V.,
oop
I
MN\
$
c\t
F.
t,
Et
(
J
Fo.
IJJ
ezo
F
N
=(,to T
1)
Y
+?
\S
\\
' -i>\
\
I--\'$
I.i
h
t. .-J
I
Z
'.-)
{
(
!
\_/
a:
C-ZIa d\I\
(
-\
-sI
\
.Jc
dx
UJ
=z
I
'f,)o
N\)u'/l
s
.Ia-o
.-l
I L
KS
fs
ll\l
r lJ
It
?,{
',nt\
,,N
is
di
cA
Ur.J
)-1t
^uU'{AEq
-\e*€a
UA\)b\ti---!-t
c+-^s\dq)
t
rs
-1
v
)
\c
\
)
A.x"J\
\
z
-ZJF
?J.(f,
rl
\,3:\)
J
:2Oy)
/
,f-q
(
I
.}'l
ilj
-\
AJ
--+--(,-2
6
C-.
q)
\\
lJJ
UJFE
==ooat
lrt! Fl<: Hl
Eq HI
=N zlJ-lrE O tl
=; 6l6o,1
oooEtoo
Io
IJJz
fi
-lo.
I
U
III
CO
--
:
.<"
{
€)
345
)
1.
:
I{i
\)
\lv
n
:
s{
,)
C
f\J
r'
Y
el
!
,3
\\,tJ-
J
=UJ
r.-
"-
I
O4
w
\n
)l
\r:l
\l \tv
p
c
+l
=J
-.)-)
\
IY\\J
ryu
S
)
e
(
',)
\
t
'J\!
\
C
'-')\
v-l..
lJ
e,
c\
,t)
U
(
t,)
.\
i}
<E
d
E
?.J
o
lt-
tisi
\r
/-.
'{J
\\g/r
{d:rJ({-
}[ix
tUlrLC
Q.q>\
ry
I
{l
?
s
\-.)
i
qL
,$
Fc_-
--=t-\
2
\{:\u-,
I
\\
(J
d{I
Sa
F
s
!:Js--)(:J
)^
\
\-
,$.
Y
\r,,
:
NY
.=
(G
(L\J' \i)(-SU
(
.5
u
iT
\ic
N:t
3e-J
,\,l
')
S
'$x
\
-_
j
.\,.-c
.L1r{
. rsl\l/
ql
)
Al
oz
IIJzoI
o-
.N
N
( rr--
)
"/\
fc\
ij4
in
CE
rl)
tn
.5((
Cct\
\,\\
{{\N
\c
"sl\
o
\
I\.
h
^\
IA
N
tt/l
o(\.\
ft-
11$
M$s
'.a
"u
C>f=I
oC)
5
q./
s
qt\in
t-\
.)
$
N
.a\
x
\nqq
\_i
)<
Fo-
UJ
ezoF
Nz
(,to
^rSI
-,1<
$
':$
-
3
L--<(
;t-\
-.Fq
t-(
,-5\r
I
\/
\\
*g
{
t
C
,.7
\A
(-T
+
--c
93
=><'D
ou
Oa
)
tr
U
.t
\
\t'
=
{J
_)
CC
-I
.E
=J+
-jst/--)
6-)U
NC
(J NN$\
R{'n
v
ryL
-J<
aU:
=
n
./ ,)
+-\oz
?\0
UJ
=,z
C\
n.r_
-
4t
\.P)il-
t
--a
c\l
tl
--+-
-{
.:
lr
\
C.\i
h\
lJ
\
^u\
r.C
a,
N\
.q(
\l
\
li
"t-
?
,
"_)
/L
d
>
ac
j
\:
l-*E
<)r<i
ss
N\}
-tD
N
's
s
\
,-'s
N
[{-trS
f')\Jr
GILr)\LlV-
t
=
JS
=
N'\,-s':(
q-+
<_-l
t:\_)>-
=\
\r!
\
r:\\\\
=q\
c:
t\,:\r
(B
\-Q
=x
\
-LtE)r>s
f----1<
)
I
$\J
\6
O
\l
=x
v
\JP
)4-))?
,<-)
nl\:
?
!!
UJF
E
=
=ooot
lrt! l-l<s Hl
Eq #I
=N zlJ-l
- O tl
=E
6t6r,1
ooo
Itoo
II
IJJz
ilol
-lol
5ll-l
=l
EI
rulql
fil
dI
I
U
tt I
c0
=
=
€)
346
J
=UJ
:1
\
\*
$\
A\.'
$\c
N,tt
t
]
J
:7
$,t:tv\.i}j
,g
{
v).\)uli\,
uj'.-5
,u<\
.:J=t4
c;z
IIJzo
I
o-
L\I
e$
f-+|,4
T)x
Fo.
UJo
zoF
N
=oto
s
N
t-l4rs
A
IIJ
=z
t,s
n\\J
S
.'r
l$.i
\l.(
t\
5
$J
J1))J
$)C
;o
IJJ
IJJF
E
==oootr
lJ.r! Fl<: Hl
Eq ilI<N zlJ-lE 6, II
=E
6t6r,t
ooo
ItooEI
uJz:rU
LIJs
-
=g)
347
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
348