Loading...
2004-3455 Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 2004-3455 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 2002-3370, WHICH CLARIFIED THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCERNING THE "MR-MARINE RECREATION" LAND USE DESIGNATION, BY AMENDING PERMITTED USES AND ADDING PROHIBITED USES, AND CLARIFYING THE RELATIONSHIP OF REQUIRED PARKING TO FLOOR AREA WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on May 29, 2002, the City Commission of the City of Miami Beach adopted Ordinance No. 2002-3370, which amended the text of the City of Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan by adding a description of acceptable uses and densities and intensities of use, among other things, for certain property within the City that is designated "MR" (Marine Recreation) on the Future Land Use Map of the City; and WHEREAS, thereafter, East Coastline Development, Ltd., pursuant to Section 163.3184(9) of Florida Statutes, initiated an administrative challenge to that Ordinance in the case styled East Coastline Development. Ltd. vs. Citv of Miami Beach and the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Case No. 02-3283GM; and WHEREAS, both the City and East Coastline desire, without either admitting or denying any legal positions in the administrative proceeding, to avoid the expense, delay, and uncertainty of lengthy litigation and to resolve this proceeding under the terms set forth herein, and agree it is in their respective mutual best interests to do so and have agreed on a "Remedial Amendment" to the previously adopted text amendment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3184(16), Florida Statutes, a proposed Compliance Agreement has been approved by the Miami Beach City Commission at a public hearing advertised at least 10 days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the manner prescribed for such advertisements in Section 163.3184(15)( c), Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 2002-3370 of the City of Miami Beach is hereby amended by amending the text of the adopted City of Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element, as follows: Marine Recreation (MR) Purpose: To provide development opportunities for existing and new recreational boating activities, recreational facilities. accessory uses and service facilities. Uses which may be Permitted: Marinas; boat docks; piers; etc., for noncommercial or commercial vessels and related upland structures; aquarium, restaurants, commercial uses, parks. bay walks. public facilities required parking for adiacent properties not separated by road or alley;. Dance halls and entertainment establishments are not permitted as a main permitted or accessory use. Intensity Limits: Intensity may be limited by such setback, height, floor area ratio, and/or other restrictions as the City Commission acting in a legislative capacity determines can effectuate the purpose of this land use category and otherwise implement complimentary public policy. However, in no case shall the intensity exceed a floor area ratio of 0.25, except that required parking for adiacent properties not separated by road or alley shall not be included in permitted floor area. SECTION 3. REPEALER. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. Within 30 days after receipt of this ordinance pursuant to the transmittal set forth below, the Department of Community Affairs shall determine whether this ordinance was adopted in accordance with the Compliance Agreement adopted this same date by the City Commission. If the Department so determines, it shall issue and publish a Notice of Intent to find the ordinance in compliance, after which East Coastline Development, Ltd., has 21 days within which to file a voluntary dismissal in litigation pending against the City before the Department of Administrative Hearings, styled East Coastline Development, Ltd., v. City of Miami Beach, Case no. 02-3283GM. This ordinance shall take effect one day following the filing of the notice of voluntary dismissal, or the resolution of any timely filed legal challenges to this ordinance. SECTION 6. TRANSMITTAL. The City Clerk within 10 days of adoption of this ordinance shall transmit 3 copies to the Department of Community Affairs, and one copy each to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, any other unit of local or state government that has filed a written request for a copy of the ordinance, and a y to East Coastline Development, Ltd. PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of .~. r, JU~L CITY CLERK ~ r APPROVED AS TO FORM & LANGUAGE & FOR EXECUT VERIFIED jIZl)!)Y ;(l/h- ~r~ CITY ATTORNE DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR T:IAGENDA\2004IJu1280 IRegularl1669 - MR comp plan text ord rev 7-l2-04.DOC 2 7fi,/o</ DATE CllY OF MIAMI BEACH COM\llISSION ITEM SUMMARY m Condensed Title: A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida approving a Compliance Agreement, Pursuant to Section 163.3184(16), Florida Statutes for settlement of certain administrative litigation styled East Coastline Development. LId.. vs. Citv of Miami Beach and the Florida Department of Communitv Affairs, Case No. 02-3283gm involving the appropriate language in the text of the Comprehensive Plan affecting the MR-Marine Recreation District. An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach. Florida, amending Ordinance No. 2002-3370. which clarified the text of the City of Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan concerning the "MR-Marine Recreation" Land Use Designation, By amending permitted uses and adding prohibited uses, and clarifying the relationship of required parking to floor area within such District; Providing for Repealer, Severabilitv and an Effective Date. Issue: Should the City Commission approve a Compliance Agreement and amend the uses in the Future Land Use category MR "Marine Recreation," of the Comprehensive Plan in order to effectuate a settlement a reement for certain endin Iiti ations with the Portofino entities? Item Summa IRecommendation: Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the City Commission will consider amending the text of the MR, "Marine Recreation," Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan by including among other permitted uses: parks, bay walks, and required parking for adjacent properties not separated by road or alley, prohibiting other certain uses and to provide that in no case shall the intensity exceed the current floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.25. except that required parking for adjacent properties not separated by road or alley shall not be included in permitted floor area. The Administration recommends that the City Commission approve the Compliance Agreement and adopt the ordinance amend in the text of the Com rehensive Plan that would fulfill the Com liance A reement. Adviso Board Recommendation: The Planning Board at its June 22, 2004 meeting made the following Motion: Summarize comments. create a model that shows massing of the concept plan and recommend approval of proposed settlement a reement. Unanimousl a roved 5-0. Financial Information: Source of ..,a~ .... '.'..',., ., ACcClllnt . ,Approved Funds: .,1 D ....2 ..,.(~/ I i04". Finance Dept. -r(i!aF Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin Mercy Lamazares/Jorge G. Gomez Si n-Offs: Department Director Assistant City Manager c T:\AGENDA\2004\JuI2804\Regular\1669 - MR text change sum.doc AGENDA ITEM RSE. DATE 7-;28-()<j CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 www.miamibeachfl.gov COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Mayor David Dermer and Members of the City Commission Jorge M. Gonzalez ~ . ~ City Manager U ~ D Date: July 28, 2004 From: Public HearinQs Subject: MR Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments and approval of Compliance AQreement A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA APPROVING A COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3184(16), FLORIDA STATUTES FOR SETTLEMENT OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION STYLED EAST COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT, LTD.. vs. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, CASE NO. 02-3283GM INVOLVING THE APPROPRIATE LANGUAGE IN THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AFFECTING THE MR-MARINE RECREATION DISTRICT. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 2002-3370, WHICH CLARIFIED THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCERNING THE "MR-MARINE RECREATION" LAND USE DESIGNATION, BY AMENDING PERMITTED USES AND ADDING PROHIBITED USES, AND CLARIFYING THE RELATIONSHIP OF REQUIRED PARKING TO FLOOR AREA WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION The Administration recommends that the City Commission approve the Compliance Agreement and adopt the ordinance amending the text of the Comprehensive Plan that would fulfill the Compliance Agreement. BACKGROUND In 1994, there was a proposal to reclassify and rezone this parcel from a Future Land Use category of MR to C-PS3. At the time of second reading, the City Commission did not approve the change and subsequent to the hearing in which the change was denied, MR Commission Memorandum July 28, 2004 Compliance Agreement and MR text change Page 2 was inadvertently not re-instated in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. On May 29, 2002, the Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2002-3370, which amended the text of the City of Miami Beach Comprehensive Plan by adding a description of acceptable uses, and densities and intensities of use among other things, to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), for certain property within the City that is designated "MR" (Marine Recreation) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the City. This text amendment cured that scrivener's error and was approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. The Notice of Intent to find the plan amendment in compliance was published in the Miami Herald on July 19, 2002. Thereafter, East Coastline Development, Ltd., pursuant to Section 163.3184(9) of Florida Statutes, initiated an administrative challenge to that Ordinance in the case styled East Coastline Development. Ltd. vs. City of Miami Beach and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Case No. 02-3283GM, one of the various judicial challenges filed by the Portofino Entities. At this time, the applicant, TRG-Alaska I, Ltd. is requesting to amend the text of the MR, "Marine Recreation," FLUE of the Comprehensive Plan by including among other permitted uses: parks, bay walks, and required parking for adjacent properties not separated by road or alley, prohibiting other certain uses and to provide that in no case shall the intensity exceed the current floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.25, except that required parking for adjacent properties not separated by road or alley shall not be included in permitted floor area. The proposed amendment to the text of the MR, "Marine Recreation," seeks to avoid the expense, delay, and uncertainty of lengthy litigation and to resolve this proceeding which is believed to be in the mutual best interests of both parties. ANALYSIS The proposed ordinance to change the text of the MR, Marine Recreation FLUE of the City's Comprehensive Plan is the result of a proposed settlement of litigation against the City and the Department of Community Affairs by one or more of the Portofino Entities. The background information for this particular case is listed on the first page of this report. The means by which this case would be settled is through a "Compliance Agreement," which would be advertised in accordance with Florida law, section 163.3184(16), Florida Statutes. Two public hearings will be conducted: one for the resolution approving the Compliance Agreement, and one for the adoption to the changes to the text of the Comprehensive Plan. During the first public hearing, the Commission will consider the resolution approving the Compliance Agreement. The second public hearing can be held immediately after approving the Compliance Agreement. At this second public hearing the City Commission will consider the Comprehensive Plan text amendments which are referenced in the Compliance Agreement, and adopt the ordinance that makes these changes. This proposed text amendment adds recreational facilities and accessory uses to the purpose of the element; and adds parks, bay walks, public facilities, and required parking Commission Memorandum July 28, 2004 Compliance Agreement and MR text change Page 3 for adjacent properties as permitted uses. It also includes a prohibition for dance halls and entertainment establishments in this FLUE. The existing FAR of 0.25 does not change. There is proposed an exemption for the required parking for adjacent properties, which would not be included in permitted floor area. As part of the settlement agreement with the Portofino Entities, the City will receive a portion of the "Alaska" parcel. The proposed amendment to the text of the FLUE will accomplish the parking needs of the adjacent property owner in accordance with the settlement agreement and at the same time benefit the city by adding other uses such as bay walks and public facilities, and prohibiting others such as dance halls and entertainment establishments. The original proposal included "residential use" as one of the permitted uses in MR; however, after the Commission voted to approve Option #2 of the Concept Plan, the inclusion of residential uses in MR is eliminated. (Note: Option #2 re-allocates the 9,500 square feet of FAR on Alaska to be included in the developable FAR within the tower to be constructed on Goodman/Hinson as residential use, resulting in an increase of 3 ft. on each side of the building and increasing the permitted FAR from 296,000 square feet to 305,500 square feet, without any increase in the height of the proposed building. This option also eliminates the 9,500 square feet of potential commercial use by the Developer within the Alaska parcel. In this scenario, the Developer would then increase its contribution of land to the City by an additional 7,100 square feet for a total of approximately 87,550 square feet of land to be deeded to the City.) FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The proposed ordinance should have a minimal, if any, adverse fiscal impact to the current condition as MR at the present time. In the future, the proposed text changes will facilitate the development of the area, inclusive of South Pointe Park, for public use. The Planning Board, as the City's Land Planning Agency, reviewed the proposed ordinance on June 22, 2004 and provided the following comments to the City Commission relative to the Concept Plan and accompanying LDR amendments, recommending adoption of the ordinance. The Design Review Board also reviewed the proposed concept plan on June 15, 2004; their comments are included below. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Board reviewed the items related to the Portofino-related settlement agreement on June 22, 2004 and had the following comments: Commission Memorandum July 28, 2004 Compliance Agreement and MR text change Page 4 Summary of Board Comments: · Allowing upzoning with a trade of land is in the best interest of the City and mitigates the density increase in other places. · Concerned about the height of Block 1 as it creates an inconsistency with the rest of the neighborhood. The massing should be at Collins and South Pointe Drive and not distributed throughout the entire block. · Boat basin - filling or leaving as is needs to be looked at again when there is a cohesive plan for the park. · With respect to commercial uses, there is an anomaly at the base of Portofino Tower if nothing else happens. Some consideration should be given to placing a transitional element at the corner of South Pointe and Alton Road. · The pedestrian access to the waterfront through Murano should be enhanced to work more like a public access and not a private road. · There should be a transitional use between the pedestal and the park. Residential uses are preferred. Would like to see limited concessionary uses in the park. · Park uses should not be micromanaged. Important to realize the land trade; there should not be large scale commercial uses in the park. · When the park design and its programmatic uses have been developed, the plan should be brought back to the Planning Board for review. Points of consensus: · Importance of land swap to create bigger corridor next to basin. · Need to redistribute heights and FAR in Block 1 and deal with open court regulations. The open courtyards in concept plan do not enhance the design of structures. · City's use of development rights at the park's edge should be limited to civic uses and perhaps very limited concessions that are accessory to park uses (rest rooms, roller blade rental, water). · Need for some transitional element between pedestal and the park. Points of less unanimity: · Re-consider distribution of uses on Block 51, in particular uses on Commerce Street, massing and revisiting open court regulations. · Limited commercial uses along South Pointe Drive on Goodman/Hinson. Individual concerns: · Closing alley on Block 1. · Public access from Alton Road to the park. · Commercial development on Block 52. Motion: Summarize comments, create a model that shows massing of the concept plan and recommend approval of proposed settlement agreement. Unanimously approved 5-0. Commission Memorandum July 28, 2004 Compliance Agreement and MR text change Page 5 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD COMMENTS The following is a summary of the comments given by the Design Review Board at the June 15, 2004 meeting regarding the South Pointe Concept Master Plan. Regarding the City's portion of the Alaska Parcel: · All members were strongly opposed to filling in the Boat Basin. . The Boat Basin is a valuable amenity. · There was a strong consensus against commercial development. · Available space should be used for a park and green space amenities. Regarding the developer's portion: · Residential uses are preferred, with the exception of an accessory restaurant. · The placement of residential uses on the south side of the parking structure on the Alaska Parcel facing the park is not desirable. · Architectural development of the parking garage elevations is the preferred method to screen the parking on the Alaska Parcel. · The safety of the public must be addressed regarding the dead end alley which will be created on Block 1 . · The vehicular bridge connection created on Block 51 is not desirable. Summary of Collaborative Planninq Process Comments relative to Concept Plan: As provided for in the term sheet approved by the parties on February 25, 2004, and finalized on March 8, 2004, the Concept Plan was to be developed in coordination and collaboration with Neighborhood Representatives. Meetings were held with the Developer and Neighborhood Representatives on March 31, April 7, May 20, and June 14, 22 and 28, 2004 in addition to public review at the Design Review Board on June 15, 2004 and at the Planning Board on June 22, 2004. An additional meeting was held by the Neighborhood Representatives and the Developer on July 12, 2004. The DRB and Planning Board recommendations listed above were not adopted as formal amendments to the Land Development Regulations. The City Commission should discuss and consider the recommendations provided by both Boards. If further changes to the Concept Plan are desired, the corresponding policy direction will need to be reflected in the proposed Land Development Regulations before 2nd reading. In summary, the Concept Plan reflects the following: Good man/Hinson/Alaska: A rounded footprint of the tower and pedestal to be constructed on Goodman/Hinson/Alaska, that allows for an expanded setback of 70 feet from and retention of the boat basin. Commission Memorandum July 28, 2004 Compliance Agreement and MR text change Page 6 At the July 7,2004 meeting, the Commission addressed the two options described below and approved b), which was described during the meeting as Option #2: a) the Developer retains the 9,500 square feet.:!:. on the Alaska parcel as permitted marine recreational use to be located at the south side of the tower's parking pedestal, deeding the originally contemplated 80,450 sf of the Alaska parcel to the City, or b) implement the preferred neighborhood option which is to re-allocate the 9,500 square feet of FAR on Alaska to be included in the developable FAR within the tower to be constructed on Goodman/Hinson as residential use, (resulting in an increase width of 3 ft on each side of the building) Le. increasing the permitted FAR from 296,000 square feet to 305,500 square feet, without any increase in the height of the proposed building, and thereby eliminating the 9,500 square feet of potential commercial use by the Developer within the Alaska parcel. In this scenario, the Developer would then increase its contribution of land to the City by an additional 7,100 square feet for a total of approximately 87,550 square feet of land to be deeded to the City. With this option, the City still retains its development rights for approximately 28,000 square feet of FAR within Alaska; such uses to be determined as part of the planning process for the design and development of South Pointe Park. Block 1,51 & 52: The DRB and Planning Board also commented on massing concerns on Block 1 and Block 51 and they discussed the activation of the ground floor (or facades) facing Commerce Street on Block 51 and Collins Avenue on Block 1. The neighborhood sentiment is to limit any further commercialization of the area. At the July 12, 2004 meeting of the neighborhood representatives participating in the Collaborative process, provided the following comments: · Commercial uses on the ground floor of Block 1 and 51. The stated preference of the residents participating in the collaborative process was not to have any retail uses on the ground floor by a very slight majority (7-6). · A secondary position was to allow commercial uses in the following areas - Block 1, facing South Pointe Drive; Block 51, from Washington Avenue up to the residential entrance (approximately half-way to Alton Road). · Height on Block 1 - it was unanimously preferred to maintain the maximum height at 75 feet. Commission Memorandum July 28, 2004 Compliance Agreement and MR text change Page 7 Again, the City Commission should consider any further changes to the Concept Plan and the corresponding policy direction that should be reflected in the proposed Land Development Regulation amendments before final adoption at 2nd reading. CITY COMMISSION ACTION At the July 7,2004 meeting, the City Commission set the public hearings for these items during the Consent Agenda. Later that day, during the discussion of the settlement agreement, a motion was made and seconded to approve Option #2 of the Concept Plan as it refers to the Alaska Parcel. By approving this option, the need to include residential use in the MR, "Marine Recreation" FLUE is eliminated. The ordinance accompanying this memorandum reflects the change. CONCLUSION Chapter 163.3184 F.S. requires that the local governing body hold one advertised public hearing for the compliance agreement, and then a public hearing for the comprehensive Plan text amendment. The public hearing shall be held at least 10 days after the day that the advertisement is published. A notice for the public hearing on July 28,2004 was mailed to the owners of record of land lying within 375 feet on June 25, 2004. Additional notice was given in the newspaper published on July 11, 2004. Under Section 163.3184(16), Florida Statutes, the Comprehensive Plan text amendment approved pursuant to the Compliance Agreement, is exempt from the traditional requirements of Sections 163.3184(2)-(7), including the usual procedures of transmittal; intergovernmental review; regional, county and municipal review; state land planning agency review; and local government review of comments. Instead, the local government adopts the Compliance Agreement, and then adopts the amendment, both after public hearings. Within 10 working days after adoption of the plan amendment, the local government transmits then circulates the approved Compliance Agreement for execution, and transmits the amendment to the state land planning agency, which has 30 days to determine whether it is in compliance with state law. The agency transmits its notice of intent to the parties, and the State Administrative Law Judge. The City publishes the notice of intent and any interested party will have 21 days to challenge the amendment. If no challenge is filed, the case is dismissed, and the amendment becomes final. JMG/C~/JGG/ML T:\AGENDA\2004\JuI2804\Regular\1669 - MR text amend .doc 8 ..,. o o N > ;~ z ::> lfl . o ...J <t '" UJ I UJ I >- CITY OF MIAMI BEACH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT TO PART II: GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ro ...,. NQTlCE IS HEREBY given that public hearings will be held by the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, in the Commission Chambers, 3rd floor, City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Mial]1i Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, Ju~ 28, 2004, at 5:15 p.rn" to consider the following: A RESQLUTlQN OF THE MAYQR AND CITY CQMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA APPROVING A COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3184(16), FLORIDA STATUTES FOR smLEMENT OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION STYLED A CASE NO, 02-32 THE AP lATE IN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AFFECTING THE MR-MARINE RECREATION DISTRICT. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY QF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENOING ORDINANCE No. 2002-3370, WHICH CLARIFIEO THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCERNING THE "MR-MARINE RECREATION" LAND USE DESIGNATION, BY AMENDING PERMJnED USES AND ADDING PROHIBITED USES, ANO CLARIFYING THE RELATIQNSHIP QF REQUIRED PARKING TO FLOOR AREA WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Inquiries may be directed to the Planning Department at (305) 673-7550. INTERESTED PARTIES are invited to appear at this meeting, or be represented by an agen\, or to express their views in writing addressed tD the City Commission, c/o the City Clerk, 1700 Convention Center Drive, 1st Fioor, City Hall, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. Copies Df the agreements and ordinance are available for public inspectIOn during normal business hours In the Planning Department Office, 1700 Convention Center Drive, 2nd Floor, City Hail, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. This meeting may be continued and under such circumstances additional legal nolice wouid not be provided. E o u '1:J iii "' .c ~ ~ ~ Robert E. Parcher, City Clerk City of Miami Beach pursuant to Section 286.0105, Fla. Stat., the City hereby advises the public that: If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or its hearing, such person must ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. This notice does nDt constitute cDnsent by the City fDr the introduction or admission of otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does It authorize chalienges or appeals not otherwise ailowed bylaw. To request this material in accessible format, sign language interpreters, Information on access for persons with disabil~Ies, and/or any accommodation to review .oy document or participate in any city-sponsored proceeding, please contact (305) 60.- 2489 (voice), (305) 673-7218 (m) five days in advance to initiate your request. TTY users may also call 711 (Florida Relay Service). (Ad #0273)