2004-3465 Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-3465
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING CHAPTER
118, "ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW
PROCEDURES," ARTICLE XI, "NEIGHBORHOOD
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS," BY CREATING A NEW
SECTION 118-708, ENTITLED "ENFORCEMENT OF
NCD REGULATIONS AND CRITERIA; APPLICATION
OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO PERMITS AND
APPROVALS,"; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION;
REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach is distinguished by an extraordinary
collective experience of residential neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the scale, character and quality of life in the neighborhoods of
Miami Beach must be continually nurtured and safeguarded for future generations; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has deemed it appropriate for the public
health, safety and welfare of the City through the Future Land Use Section of the
Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the special character of residential
neighborhoods ofthe City; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has adopted the "Neighborhood Conservation
District" enabling ordinance as an appropriate land development overlay tool in further
achieving this objective; and
WHEREAS, the thoughtful development of specific Neighborhood Conservation
Districts will require that fundamental elements key to their success be identified and
appropriately regulated during the public review process; and
WHEREAS, the enforcement ofNCD regulations and criteria and the application
of equitable estoppel to permits and approvals as set forth below is necessary to
accomplish the above objectives.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.
SECTION 1. That Chapter 118, "Administration and Review Procedures," Article XI,
"Neighborhood Conservation Districts" of the Land Development Regulations of the
Code of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, is hereby amended by adding section 118-708,
Enforcement ofNCD regulations and criteria; application of equitable estoppel to permits
and approvals, as follows:
Sec. 118-708. Enforcement of NCD rel!:ulations and criteria: application of equitable
estoppel to permits and approvals.
(a) Following the preliminary review public hearing. a referral by the City Commission to
the Planning Department to pursue a proposed NCD designation shall impose the
requirement that all applications and! or requests for design and! or development
review approval within a proposed NCD shall be consistent with the character and
intent of the proposed NCD as defined by the criteria set forth in the preliminary
evaluation and recommendation prepared by the Planning Department.
(b) Such requirement in (a) above shall expire upon the earlier of either the favorable
recommendation of the NCD designation by the Planning Board. the effective date of
the adopted NCD. a final vote of the City Commission declining to adopt the NCD.
or six (6) months following the referral. unless the requirement in (a) is extended for
an additional period of time by action of the City Commission.
(c) In the event a property owner has obtained (n a design review approval. (ii) a
certificate of appropriateness. (iin a variance approval where no design review
approval or certificate of appropriateness is required. or (iv) a full building permit as
defined in Section 114-1 where no design review approval. certificate of
appropriateness or variance approval is required. prior to the referral in (a) above. the
NCD criteria provided for in (a) above shall not be enforced against such proiect or
application.
SECTION 2. REPEALER. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith
be and the same are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or provision of this
Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity.
SECTION 4. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the City Commission that this
Ordinance be entered into the Code, and it is hereby ordained that the sections of this
Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; and that the
word "ordinance" may be changed to "section" or other appropriate word.
2
PASSED and ADOPTED this 10th day
,2004.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance
adoption.
~r~
C TY CLERK
If'l1.ot
DATE
ROVED AS TO
aRM & LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
~~
CITY T ORNEY ~
j () - 5- 0 l.-(
DATE
F:\PLAN\$ALL\Neighborhood Conservation Districts\City
Commission\NCDinterimcontrolsamend708.0rdCC1 sl.1 0.13.04.doc
F:\atto\HELG\Ordinances\NCDinterimcontrolsamend 1st reading.1 01304.doc
3
(REFERENCE ONL Y)
Sec. 118.168. Proposed land development regulation amendments;
application of equitable estoppel to permits and approvals.
(a) Amendments to these land development regulations shall be. enforced
against all applications and/or requests for project approval upon the
earlier of the favorable recommendation by the planning board or the
applicable effective date of the land development regulation amendment,
as more particularly provided below. After submission of a completed
application for a project approval, to the extent a proposed amendment to
these land development regulations would. upon adoption, render the
application nonconforming, then the following procedure shall apply to all
applications considered by the city or any appropriate city board:
(1) In the eventthe applicant:
a. Obtains (i) a design review approval, (ii) a certificate of
appropriateness, (iii) a variance approval where no design review
approval or certificate of appropriateness is required, or (iv) a full
building permitas defined in section 114-1 where no design review
approval, certificate of appropriateness or variance approval is
required; and
b. Satisfies subsection a., above, prior to a favorable recommendation
by the planning board with respect to any land development
regulation amendment that is adopted by the city commission within
90 days of the planning board's recommendation, then the project
shall be presumed to have received a favorable determination that
equitable estoppel applies and the subject land development
regulation amendment shall not be enforced against the application
and/or project (hereinafter, a "favorable determination"), except as
otherwise provided in subsection (b), below. If at any time before the
expiration of the 90 days the proposed amendment fails before the
city commission, then the project shall no longer be deemed
nonconforming.
(2) In the event the applicant:
a. Obtains (i) a design review approval, (ii) a certificate of
appropriateness, (iii) a variance approval where no design review
approval or certificate of appropriateness is required, or (iv) a full
building permit as defined in section 114-1 where no design review
approval, certificate of appropriateness or variance approval is
required; and
b. Satisfies subsection a., above, prior to the effective date of any land
development regulation amendment where there was an unfavorable
recommendation by the planning board with respect to the land
development regulation amendment, or when the planning board
recommends favorably, but the city commission fails to adopt the
amendment within the specified 90 day period, then the project shall
be presumed to have received a favorable determination and the
subject land development regulation amendment shall not be
enforced against such application and/or project, except as otherwise
provided in subsection (b), below.
(3) In the event an applicant does not qualify under subsections (1) or (2) of
this subsection (a) for a presumption of a favorable determination to avoid
enforcement of adopted amendments against an application and/or
project, then the applicant may seek a determination from a court of
competent jurisdiction as to whether equitable estoppel otherwise exists.
If, however, an applicant fails to seek a determination from the court, or if
the court has made a determination unfavorable to the applicant, and such
determination is not reversed on appeal, then the city shall fully enforce
the adopted land development regulation amendment(s) against the
applicant's application and/or project.
(4) Any presumption of a favorable determination under subsections (1) and
(2) of this subsection (a), or any favorable determination under subsection
(3) of this subsection (a), shall lapse contemporaneously with the failure,
denial, expiration, withdrawal, or substantial amendment of the
application, approval, or permit relative to the project or application to
which the favorable determination is applied.
(5) For purposes of this subsection (a), all references to obtaining design
review approval, a certificate of appropriateness or variance approval,
shall mean the meeting date at which the respective board approved such
application or approved such application with conditions. For purposes of
this subsection (a), "substantial amendment" shall mean an amendment or
modification (or a proposed amendment or modification) to an application,
approval or permit which, in the determination of the planning and zoning
director, is sufficiently different from the original application or request that
the amendment would require the submission of a new application/request
for approval of same. All references to obtaining a building permit shall
mean the date of issuance of the permit.
(6) After submission of a completed application for a project approval, to the
extent a proposed amendment to the land development regulations would,
upon adoption, render the application nonconforming, then the city or any
appropriate city board shall not approve, process or consider an
application unless and until (i) the project has cured the nonconformity or
, '
the applicant acknowledges that the city shall fully enforce the adopted
land development regulation amendment(s) against the applicant's
application and/or project; (ii) the project qualifies under subsections (1) or
(2), and subject to subsection (4), of this subsection (a), above; or (iii) a
favorable determination has been made by a court. Except as otherwise
provided herein, any proceeding or determination by any city employee.
department, agency or board after a project becomes nonconforming shall
not be deemed a waiver of the city's right to enforce any adopted land
development regulation amendments.
(b) Subsections 118-168(a) and (b) shall not apply to proposed
amendments to chapter 118, which would designate specific properties
or districts as historic. The moratorium regulations applicable to such
proposed amendments are set forth in chapter 118, article X, division 4.
(Ord. No. 89-2665, ~ 14-7, eft. 10-1-89; Ord. No. 92-2865, eft. 8-7-93; Ord. No.
94-2947, eff. 10-15-94; Ord. No. 98-3106, ~ 1,1-7-98; Ord. No. 98-3130, ~ 1, 7-
15-98; Ord. No. 2000-3253, ~ 1, 7-12-00)
(REFERENCE ONL Y)
Section 114-1
Full building permit means the full and complete building permit allowing
construction of the entire project, and requiring submission of all plans required
and approved by the design review board, the historic preservation board, the
planning board or the board of adjustment. A full building permit shall not be
merely a demolition, electrical, foundation, mechanical or plumbing permit or any
other partial permit that does not include all plans for the entire project as
submitted, required and approved by the design review board, the historic
preservation board, the planning board or the board of adjustment; except that
projects that have been approved for phased development by the design review
board, the historic preservation board, the planning board or the board of
adjustment may obtain a phased development permit instead of a full building
permit.
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
m
Condensed Title:
An Ordinance of The Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, to consider
amending the adopted Neighborhood Conservation District enabling ordinance to include a new Section
118-708 creating provisions relative to the enforcement of NCD regulations and criteria and the application
of equitable estoppel to permits and approvals.
Issue:
Should the Neighborhood Conservation District enabling ordinance be amended to allow the City
Commission to initiate specific temporary design and! or development review controls within a proposed
NCD?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
The City Administration has contemplated that due to the substantial length of the adoption process, certain
aspects of a neighborhood's character key to the success of a particular NCD may be vulnerable to loss.
during the process. The current ordinance, as it has been defined, would not instate specific design and or
development regulations until there has been a favorable recommendation by the Planning Board; this is
several steps into the adoption process.
The Administration believes that the City Commission should be able to initiate certain limited regulatory
controls at the time of the preliminary review public hearing; step two (2) of the adoption process. Such
interim controls would be outlined in the preliminary evaluation report and would be specifically tailored to the
intent of the individual NCD. This will ensure that a thoughtful development of the plan can occur, without the
potential for loss of vital neighborhood character.
The City Commission heard this item on first reading, October 13, 2004 and voted 5-0 ( 2 absent) to
recommend the amendment for second reading public hearing on November 10, 2004.
The Administration recommends that the City Commission approve the ordinance amendment on second
reading public hearing.
Advisory Board Recommendation:
The Planning Board heard this matter at a public hearing on September 28, 2004, and voted 4-0 (3 absent)
to recommend that the City Commission approve the amendment to the recently adopted Neighborhood
Conservation District enabling ordinance.
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1
I I 2
Finance Dept. Total
Cit Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin :
Jorge G. Gomez! Reuben N. Caldwell, Planning Department
Assistant City Manager
City Manager
(1 L
AGENDA ITEM ---1?S1::1.-
DATE {{-Io-ot
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139
www.miamibeachfl.gov
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Mayor David Dermer and
Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez ". ~
City Manager U If' D
Date: November 10, 2004
Second Readino Public Hearino
Subject:
Interim Controls Amendment to the Adopted NeiQhborhood
Conservation District EnablinQ Ordinance
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 118, "ADMINISTRATION AND
REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE XI, "NEIGHBORHOOD
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS," BY CREATING A NEW SECTION 118-708,
ENTITLED "ENFORCEMENT OF NCD REGULATIONS AND CRITERIA;
APPLICATION OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO PERMITS AND
APPROVALS,"; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; REPEALER;
SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
The City Administration recommends that the City Commission approve the ordinance
amendment on second reading public hearing.
BACKGROUND:
At its September 8th, 2004 public hearing, the City Commission adopted the Neighborhood"
Conservation District enabling ordinance on second reading. In addition to the request for
adoption of the ordinance, the City Administration recommended that the City Commission
consider amending the ordinance to include provisions for interim design and/ or
development review controls. Since the City Attorney opined that the Commission should
not amend substantive new language without sufficient prior notice, the City Administration
in consultation with the City Attorney recommended that the City Commission adopt the
ordinance as advertised with the provision that new language regarding interim controls be
brought back to the Commission for future adoption subsequent to prior review by the
Planning Board. Consequently, the City Commission adopted the enabling ordinance by a
vote of (6-1) affirming that the Planning Department draft the amendment regarding interim
controls.
City Commission Memorandum
Interim Controls Amendment to the Adopted Neighborhood Conservation District Enabling Ordinance
Second Readina Public Hearina
November 10, 2004
Page 2 of 3
ANALYSIS:
In recommending that the Neighborhood Conservation District enabling ordinance be
amended to allow the City Commission to initiate specific temporary design and/ or
development review controls within a proposed NCD, the City administration has
contemplated that due to the substantial length of the adoption process, certain aspects of
a neighborhood's character key to the success of a particular NCD may be vulnerable to
loss during the process. In particular, the amount of time which transpires between the City
Commission's initial direction to staff to prepare an NCD plan and the formal adoption of
specific design and/ or development controls by the Planning Board would likely be a
minimum of three (3) months and could in some cases take six (6) months or more to
achieve community consensus. During that time, a substantial number of building permits
could be pulled that might threaten the ultimate success of the NCD plan. The current
ordinance, as it has been defined, would not instate specific design and or development
regulations until there has been a favorable recommendation by the Planning Board; this is
several steps into the adoption process. Referring to the attached flow chart delineating
the adoption procedures for NCDs as outlined in Section 118-705 of the adopted enabling
ordinance, the process has been defined to incorporate four (4) or more public hearings in
addition to required consensus building workshops; the third public meeting being the
Planning Board hearing, at which time regulatory adherence to an NCD plan would be
activated.
The City Administration believes that the City Commission should be able to initiate certain
limited regulatory controls at the time of the preliminary review public hearing; step two (2)
of the adoption process. Such interim controls would be outlined in the preliminary
evaluation report and would be specifically tailored to the intent of the individual NCD. For
example, some NCDs may warrant interim controls on demolition, while other NCDs may
be focused on customizing building setbacks or defining developable lot regulations.
Finally, staff believes any interim controls associated with an NCD should remain in place
throughout the development of the plan and should expire generally within a period of six
(6) months or with a favorable recommendation by the Planning Board pursuant to Article
III Chapter 118 of the Code at which time zoning in progress would commence. This will
ensure that a thoughtful development of the plan can occur, without the potential for loss of
vital neighborhood character, as identified by the intent of the NCD.
CITY COMMISSION ACTION
The City Commission referred the item to the Planning Board contemporaneously with the
adoption of the enabling legislation on September 8,2004, by a vote of (6-1).
The City Commission heard this item on first reading, October 13, 2004 and voted 5-0 (2
absent) to recommend the amendment for second reading public hearing on November 1 0,
2004.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION
The Planning Board heard this matter at a public hearing on September 28, 2004, and
City Commission Memorandum
Interim Controls Amendment to the Adopted Neighborhood Conservation District Enabling Ordinance
Second Readina Public Hearina
November 10, 2004
Page 3 of 3
voted 4-0 (3 absent) to recommend that the City Commission approve the amendment to
the recently adopted Neighborhood Conservation District enabling ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT
The amendment creates new provisions within the adopted enabling legislation not specific
to a particular NCD. Therefore, adverse fiscal impact is not contemplated with the adoption
of this ordinance.
CONCLUSION
According to Sec. 118-164, when a request to amend the land development regulations
does not change the actual list of permitted, conditional or prohibited uses in a zoning
category, the proposed ordinance requires two readings, by title or in full on at least two
separate days and shall, at least ten days prior to adoption, be noticed once in a
newspaper of general circulation in the city. Following the second reading public hearing,
the Commission can adopt the ordinance by a 5/7ths vote.
JMG/C~/J~nc
F:IPLANI$ALLINeighborhood Conservation DistnctslCity CommissionlNCDinterimcontrolsamend708CommMemoCC2nd11.1 0.04.doc
PROCEDURES FOR ADOPTION OF ANEIGH80RHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Updated from. Land Use and Development Committee Meeting
June 7,2004
(a)____________________________________________________________________. REQUESTS
(b)-__uuu ____uuuuuu__u____uu nnnuun----------PRELlMINARY REVIEW
(d) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -DRB DISCUSSION
(e) _ _ _ _ u _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ n n _ n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FINAL ADOPTION
26
"
0
0
N
00
N
Cl:
w
al
0
f-
U
0
,c
<(
0
on
Cl:
:0
I
f-
a
--'
<(
Cl:
ill
I
. ill
I
f-
E
0
u
l:i
ro
Q;
""
;;
3
3
~
~
.CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
~
NOTICE IS HEREBY given that public hearings will be held by the Mayor and City Commission of the City Of Miami
~each, Florida, in the Commission Chambers, 3rd floor, City Hall, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida, on
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at the times listed below to consider the following: .
at 11:00 a.m.:
AN ORDINANCE AMENOING ORDINANCE NUMBER 200.3-3411 BY AMENDING THE RESTRICTIONS ON THE LOCATIONS
WHERE PANHANDLING is PROHIBITED ANO PROVIDiNG FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Inquiries may be directed to the Legal Department at (305) 673-7470.
at 11:15 a.m.: .
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING OROINANCE NO.. 789, THE CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES SALARY OROINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING
THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF FIELD INSPECTOR I, FIELD INSPECTOR II AND PARKING DISPATCHER IN GROUP IV, 1lEI~
THOSE CLASSIFICATIONS COVERED BY THE COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA (CWA), LOCAL"317B;
TRANSFERRING THE TITLES OF THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF BACKFLOW COORDINATOR, CARPENTER SUpERVISOR,
CENTRAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR, LEAD MECHANIC, SANITATION OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR, SERVICE SUPERVlSOR,ANO
911 COMMUNICATIONS RECOROS CUSTODIAN FROM GROUP VI, BEING OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE CLASSIFIED
SERVICE NOT COVERED BY A BARGAINING UNIT, TO GROUP V, BEING THOSE CLASSIFICATIONS COVERED BY THE
GOVERNMENT SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION OF FLORIOA (GSAF), OPEIU LOCAL 100; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALER,
SEVERABILITY, EFFECTIVE DATE AND CODIFICATION.
at 11:16 a.m.: ' '.> .,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING OROINANCE NO.. 160.5, UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES SALARY ORDINANCE, ESTABUSl'liNG l!:IE
CLASSIFICATIONS OF CODE COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR, CULTURAL FACILITIES MANAGER, FIELD MONlTOII,
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ANALYST, HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR, NElGHBORHOOD
SERVICES PROJECTS ADMINISTRATOR ANO SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST; AMENOING THE TITLES OF. THE
CLASSIFICATIONS OF BEACH PATROL CAPTAIN TO OCEAN RESCUE OIVISION CHIEF, FIELD INSPECTOR TO FlEUl
SUPERVISOR, MANAGEMENT & BUDGET DIRECTOR TO BUDGET & PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT DIRECTOR, AND.RIGHT
OF WAY SUPERVISOR TO RIGHT OF WAY MANAGER; PROVIDING FOR A REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, EFFECTIVE DATE; AND
rODlFICATION.
at 11:17 a.m.: . ' ,.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1335, THE CLASslFlED EMPLOYEES' LEAVE ORDiNANCE, BY AMENDlNGiHE
PROVISIONS FOR ACCUMULATION AND PAYMENT DF ANNUAL ANO SICK LEAVE FOR THE FRATERNAL ORDER OFJ'OUC.E
(FOP), THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS (IAFF), AND CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES NOT COVERED OYA
BARGAINING UNIT ANO KNOWN AS THE GROUP "OTHERS" PROVIOING FOR A REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
at 11:1B a.m.: ..
Af'J ORDINANCE AMENDING DRDINANCE NO. 1613, THE UNCLASSIFIEO EMPLOYEES' LEAVE OROINANCE, BY AMENDiNG
THE PROVISIONS FOR ACCUMULATION AND PAYMENT OF ANNUAL ANO SICK LEAVE; PROVIOING FOR A Ra'EALER,
SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Inquiries may be directed to Human Resources at (305) 673-7524.
at 11:30 a.m.:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 142, "LANO DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS," OF THE CITY CODE; DIVISION 7."CCC,
CIVIC ANO CONVENTION CENTER DISTRICT,"BY CREATING A NEW SECTION 142-368 ENTITLED "OFFSITE PARKING,"
PROVIDING THAT REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED FOR USES IN THIS OISTRICT, LOCATEO OFF-SITE PURSUAtfT TO
SECTION 130.-36, SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN PERMITTED FLOOR AREA WHEREVER LOCATED; PROVIDING FQR
COOIFICATION, REPEALER, SEVERA81L1TY AND EFFECTIVE OATE. . '.
at 5:01 p.m.:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,OY
AMENDING CHAPTER 142, "ZONING OISTRICTS ANO REGULATIONS", ARTICLE II, "DISTRICT REGULATIONS., DMSlON 3,
"RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY DISTRICTS," SUBDIVISION II, "RM-l RESIOENTIAL MULTIFAMILY lOW.INTENSIT'!:"'1
SUBDIVISION IV, "RM-2 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM INTENSITY," AND DIVISION 15, "TH TOwtjHOUSl:
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, "BY AMENDING SECTION 142-156, SECTION 142-218 ANO SECTION 142-606, RESPECTIVELY, ro .
ESTABLISH REVISED STANDARDS FOR PARKING LOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS WHEN THERE IS AN APPROVE!} srAttT I
IMPROVEMENT PLAN THAT INCORPORATES A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARKING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY; PROVIDING fOR
REPEALER, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE OATE.
Inquiries may be directed to the Planning Oepartment at (305) 673-7550.
at 5:05 p.m.:
AN ORDINANCE AMENOING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE COOE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY AMENOING CHAPTER 118, "ADMINISTRATION ANO REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE XI, "NEIGHBORHOOD
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS," BY CREATING A NEW SECTION 118-708, ENTITLEO "ENFORCEMENT OF NCD REGULATIONS
ANO CRITERIA; APPLICATION OF EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL TO PERMITS AND APPROVALS," PROVIDING FOR CODIFlCATIllN;
REPEALER; SEVERABILITY; AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. .. . .
,liquiries may be directed to the Planning Department at (305) 673-7550.
INTERESTED PARTIES are invited to appear at this meeting, or be represented by an agent, or to express their YleW81n
writing addressed to the City Commission, c/o the City Clerk, 1700. Convention Center Drive, 1 st Floor, City Hall, Miami
Beach, Florida 33139. This meeting may be continued and under such circumstances addilionallegal notice WOlJId not
be provided.
Robert E. Parcher, City Clerk
City of Miami Beach
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Fla. Stal., the City hereby advises the public that: if a person decides to app8al any
decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or its hearing, suchperllQf1
must ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. This notice does not constitute consent b~ the City for the introduction or admission Of
otherwise inadmissible or irrelevant evidence, nor does it authorize challenges or appeals not otherwise allowell bylaw.
To request this material in accessible format, sign language interpreters, information on access for persons vilth
disabilities, and/or any accommodation to review any document or participate in any city-sponsored proceeding, please
contact (305) 604-2489 (voice), (305) 673-7218 (TlY) five days in advance to initiate your requesl. TTY users may lIlso
call 711 (Florida Relay Service). .
(Ad #0285)