Wms, Hatfield et al Amend 6
:<001(- E?3/
AMENDMENT NO.6
TO THE PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
AND
WILLIAMS, HATFIELD & STONER, INC., D/B/A TETRA-TECH WHS,
DATED JULY 18, 2001,
IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $58,220.00,
FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
NECESSARY FOR THE DESIGN OF THE RE-PLANNING STUDY ORIGINATED BY
THE COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21,2003,
FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
NEIGHBORHOOD NO.4 - NORMANDY ISLE AND NORMANDIE SUO PROJECT.
Tl;1i,s Amendment No. 6 to the Agreement made and entered this /~It.. day of
NbVtnJ,{IJr:rtl- ,2004, by and between the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Municipal
Corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as
CITY), having its principal offices at 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida
33139, and Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. d/b/a TETRA-TECH WHS, having its offices
at 1601 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 220, Coral Gables, Florida 33146 (hereinafter
referred to as CONSULTANT). .
RECITALS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 07-00/01, the Mayor
and City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-24505, on July 18, 2001, approving
and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with Williams, Hatfield
& Stoner, Inc., d/b/a TETRA-TECH WHS, for Professional Services for the Normandy Isle
and Normandie Sud Streetscape Right-of-Way Neighborhood Project (the Project); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for the detailed planning, design, permitting,
bidding / award and construction administrative services for various streetscape /
landscape / utility improvements within the Normandy Isle and Normandie Sud
neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement was executed for a not-to-exceed amount of
$617,664.00; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2003, the Mayor and City Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2003-25320, approving additional design services as Amendment No.1,
for rear easement waterline relocation efforts, for a not-to-exceed amount of $50,529.00;
and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2004, the Mayor and City Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2004-25488, approving additional design services as Amendment No.2,
for re-design of lighting system, pursuant the City's new standards, a planning study
related to hardscape and landscape revisions arising from the community design review
meeting held on October 21, 2003, and for administration, specifications, and
reimbursables associated with the additional Scope of Work, for an amount of
$30,500.00; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No.3 is in the process of being executed, to include the
additional professional landscaping architectural and engineering services for the detail
design, permitting and bidding / award services for the extension of the proposed right-of-
way Improvements on Bay Drive between Marseille Drive and the Normandy Shores
Bridge are required to complement the design efforts for the entire neighborhood, for a
not-to-exceed amount of $17,047.00; and
WHEREAS, on July 24,2004, Amendment No.4 was executed, to include the
participation ofthe Consultant in eight additional design progress meetings, originated by
design revisions, for a not-to-exceed amount of $7,458.00; and
WHEREAS, the planning effort for the Normandy Isle and Normandie Sud
neighborhood has been completed and detail design activities are underway; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No.5, also submitted to the City Commission on this
date, has a Scope of Work which consists of additional design services for the
replacement of additional existing 4-inch and 6-inch diameter cast iron water lines with
new 8-inch diameter water lines to be relocated under the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) Rights-of-Way 7151 Street and Normandy Drive, for a not-to-
exceed amount of $50,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 Scope of Work consists of additional design
services for the design effort to implement the re-planning study originated from the
Community Design Review Meeting (CDRM) held on October 21, 2003; and
WHEREAS, these improvements include redistribution ofthe savings produced by
the revised City lighting standards for single family residential areas, requiring a reduced
illumination level from 1.0 ft-candle to 0.6 ft-candle, into landscaping and hardscaping
modifications; and
WHEREAS, this fee proposal has been evaluated by Hazen & Sawyer, the City's
Program Manager, and the CIP Office and the latter has negotiated with TTWHS for the
final amount of $58,220.00; and
WHEREAS, the funding source is the reallocation of previously appropriated funds
for construction, in an amount not to exceed $58,220.00, from the neighborhood's
General Obligation Bond funds for said services.
NOW. THEREFORE. the parties hereto, and in consideration of the mutual
promises, covenants, agreements, terms, and conditions herein contained, and other
good and valuable consideration, the respect ~nd adequacy are hereby acknowledged,
do agree as follows:
1. ABOVE RECITALS
The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as a part of this
Amendment No.6.
2. MODIFICATIONS
The Agreement is amended as defined in Schedule "A-6", attached herein.
3. OTHER PROVISIONS.
All other provisions of the Agreement, as amended, are unchanged.
4. RATIFICATION.
The City and Consultant ratify the terms of the Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment No.6.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No.6 to be
executed in their names by their duly authorized officials as of the date first set forth
above.
ATTEST:
OF MIAMI BEACH
~(p~
CITY CLERK
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CONSULTANT:
WILLIAMS, HATFIELDS & STONER, INC.
DIBIA TETRA-TECH
~F
SECRETARY
-It.H, ~~{C-
Print Name
to..l/j~Y
ity Attom~ Date
SCHEDULE "A-6"
TO
AMENDMENT NO.6
TO THE PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL
AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA
AND
WILLIAMS, HATFIELD & STONER, INC., D/B/A TETRA-TECH WHS,
DATED JULY 18, 2001,
IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $58,220.00,
FOR THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES,
NECESSARY FOR THE DESIGN OF THE RE-PLANNING STUDY ORIGINATED BY
THE COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 2003,
FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
NEIGHBORHOOD NO.4 - NORMANDY ISLE AND NORMANDIE SUO PROJECT.
Scope of Services:
The Scope of Work consists of various tasks that will result in the preparation of the Contract
Documents for the design efforts for the re-planning study originated by the Community
Design Review Meeting held on October 21,2003. These improvements were necessitated
by the neighborhood's decision not to proceed with a proposed guardhouse and related
street closures.
The re-planning study Scope of Work can be funded through savings generated by the City's
review of its lighting standards for the single family areas, requiring a reduced illumination
level from 1.0 ft-candle to 0.6 ft-candle.
Re-planning efforts will concentrate in landscaping and hardscaping scope.
A detailed scope is defined in Exhibit "Au, TASK 5.6 - Design Effort for Re-Planning Study,
dated October 14,2004, attached herein.
Compensation:
· Original Agreement amount $617,664.00.
· Amendment No.1 (relocation of existing utility improvements) amount $50,529.00.
· Amendment No.2 (study of revisions from BODR meeting) amount $30,500.00.
· Amendment NO.3 (improvements along Bay Drive) amount $17,047.00.
· Amendment No.4 (additional progress meetings) amount $7,458.00.
· Amendment No.5 (additional water lines and meter relocation) amount $50,000.00.
· Amendment No.6 (additional design of re-planning study) amount ~58.220.00.
· Revised Agreement amount J781.418.00.
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
RIGHT OF WAY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
NEIGHBORHOOD No.4 - NORMANDY ISLES
AMENDMENT No.6
TASK 5.6 - DESIGN EFFORT FOR RE-PLANNING STUDY
October 14,2004
In June 2002, the WHS/Tetra Tech team completed the planning efforts for the Normandy Isle
and Normandy Sud Right of Way and Infrastructure Improvement program. A Basis of Design
Report w as prepared a nd approved b y the City Commission. This document represented the
requests of the residents and served as the basis for the preparation of the construction
documents. Prior to the team being hired and the voter's approval of the General Obligation
Bond Program, the City held public workshops on March 29, 2000 and June 6, 2000, to identify
the neighborhood needs and priorities.
These needs were given as a basis for the Tetra Tech - WHS team to begin the planning of the
neighborhood improvements. This team conducted two Community Design Workshops and
numerous meetings with citizens, City administration and staff, which served to secure input
during the planning phase. The first Community Design Workshop was held on November IS,
2001. The team presented design ideas and the citizens were gathered by area and given the
opportunity for input. Their input was then incorporated into the final design solutions and
presented at a second Community Design Workshop on January 24, 2002. Once again the
citizens were given the opportunity for input and design consensus was achieved in all items but
one - sidewalk infill in the Normandy Sud area. The City then conducted additional meetings
with the purpose of discussing this issue and reaching consensus. On May 13, 2002 the project
was presented to the G.O. Bond Committee to seek approval. This meeting was open to the
public and the public input was obtained. Minor changes were made and the final document was
presented to the City Commission on June 19,2002. The citizens were given the opportunity for
input and the City Commission made minor recommendations for changes on the street-end
designs and provided the final determination for the sidewalk infill item. The Basis of Design
Report (BODR) was approved by the Commission at this meeting. The consulting team was
given the authorization to begin the design work, based on the improvements and scope
identified in the BODR.
As part of the effort during the Design portion of the process, the City and Consulting team held
a Community Design Review Meeting (CDRM) after 30% and 60% Completion Stage
Submittals, for the purpose 0 f presenting the progress 0 f t he documentation 0 f improvements
proposed during the planning stage. This meeting was held on October 21,2003. The purpose of
this meeting was to present the 60% Completion Plans, which had been developed based on the
BODR.
Page 10f4
Normandy Isle & Normandie Sud
10/19/2004
The Normandy Sud area was developed during the planning phase as a "controlled access
neighborhood". It was anticipated, during the planning efforts this area would establish a
"Special Taxing District" to enable the development of a controlled access neighborhood with a
new gatehouse, and street closures at Rue Notre Dame and Rue Bordeaux. This proposal was
defeated by the citizens of the areas, after the approval ofthe BODR. The rejection of this effort,
directly impacted the proposed improvements by removing the need for a gatehouse- with
reconfigured median and traffic lanes, and maintaining the open entries to the neighborhood at
Rue Notre Dame and Rue Bordeaux.
On October 17, 2003 the City's Public Works Department adopted a revised lighting standard for
the single family residential areas - requiring an illumination level of 0.6 ft-candles, versus the
1.0 ft.-candle previously established. The lighting for the Normandy Sud neighborhood, which
had been designed to the 1.0 foot candle level, is to be redesigned to the new standard, therefore
reducing the number of poles required, and achieving a savings for this item. The estimated
savings for this item is $125,000. The citizen's of the Normandy Sud area, approved the
lighting redesign effort at the October CDRM, and would like to see the savings achieved
applied to their requested improvement changes.
Funding for improvements in this neighborhood is fixed. Savings resulting from the lighting
redesign, could be used to fund some of the improvements, as well as the design fees associated
with the changes. As a result the City reviewed the Normandy Sudcitizens' requests and is
willing to consider the revisions to some of the items. The City authorized the Consulting team
to evaluate these requests and prepare impacts to construction cost, design fees and time for
implementation of these changes.
The following Scope 0 f Work consists 0 fa dditional design services for the incorporation the
outlined tasks within the Normandy S ud Neighborhood p er the resident's requests during the
Community Design Review Meeting held October 21, 2003. These improvements were not
included in the BODR or on any previous scopes of work for this project. The current plans
(approximately 60 percent complete) will be revised to incorporate these additional
improvements.
Task 5.6.1
Large Palms on North-South Streets
The Consulting team shall relocate or remove (depending on condition) all existing Medjool
Date Palms and Coconut Palms along Rue Bordeaux and Rue Notre Dame from NW 7151 Street
to Bay D rive and replant with new Royal Palms. The tree disposition plans identified in the
attached Exhibit 'c' showing the modified intent for existing material and the landscape plans
showing the new plantings for these streets will be modified. The Encroachment List will be
revised to incorporate the changes approved by the City.
Task 5.6.2
Organize Palms along Trouville
The Consulting team shall modify the drawings to reflect the existing median configuration.
Currently the 60% drawings show the median configured for a guardhouse with entry lane. The
base drawing, corresponding Tree disposition, Landscape and Irrigation Plans identified in the
attached Exhibit 'C' will be modified to indicate crape myrtles along the sides of Trouville
Page 2 of4
Normandy Isle & Normandie Sud
10/19/2004
Esplanade and royals/coconuts in the median to remain. Automatic irrigation will be added to
the existing median configuration. T he Encroachment List will be revised to incorporate the
changes approved by the City.
Task 5.6.3
Revised Paver Lavouts
The residents requested the addition 0 f concrete unit pavers for the intersections 0 f T rouville
Esplanade, Rue Bordeaux, and Rue Notre Dame with NW 71 st Street, Biarritz Drive and Bay
Drive. The corresponding Demolition Plans, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plans, Pavement
Marking Plans and Details Plans shall be modified as identified in the attached Exhibit 'c' by the
Consulting team to indicate unit pavers at the cross walks of the intersections.
Task 5.6.4
Uplighting of Entrances
The Consulting team shall modify the electrical plans and detail sheet, identified in the attached
Exhibit 'C', to comply with the residents' request for landscape up lighting for all the Royal
Palms proposed within the median along Trouville Esplanade, Rue Bordeaux and Rue Notre
Dame. Two up lights per palm are proposed. The current plans indicate uplighting for the palms
along the T rouville median configured for a guardhouse entry. Additional u plighting will be
included for the reconfigured palms along this street as well as the palms along Rue Bordeaux
and Rue Notre Dame which originally were not proposed to be uplighted.
Task 5.6.5
Maintain a more "Eclectic" Landscaping Pattern
The Consulting team shall modify the tree disposition plans identified in the attached Exhibit 'c'
to indicate trees to be removed/relocated or remaining as well as the landscape plans to show
new trees and palms to comply with the residents request for maintenance of the existing
vegetation throughout the neighborhood. The current plans at 60% Design Completion indicate
the approved BODR design which called solely for canopy trees for all east-west streets - Bay
and Biarritz Drive and large palms for the north-south streets - Trouville Esplanande, Rue
Bordeaux, and Rue Notre Dame. At the latest CDRM, the residents voted to keep much of the
existing vegetation, though not "pure" to the design, and infilling with trees or palms
accordingly. The Encroachment List will be revised to incorporate the changes approved by the
City.
Task 5.6.6
Contract Administration and Coordination
TT - WHS shall provide contract administration services and coordinate the effort in preparation
of 60% Design Completion Stage submittal to ensure all revisions of the Re-Planning Study are
included in the revised plans. Consultant shall ensure that all Design Standard Manual
requirements are complied with, key maps are consistent, and verify overall coordination of
interdisciplinary improvements to avoid conflicts.
Page 3 of4
Normandy Isle & Normandie Sud
10/19/2004
Task 5.6.7
Update Cost Estimate
The Consulting team shall assist in the preparation of opinions of probable construction costs for
60% Completion Design submittal, as well as the 90% and final cost for ( 100%) completion
stage.
Task 5.6.8
60% Submittal of the Re-Planning Effort Design
The Consulting team shall coordinate and submit a separate Normandy Sud
hardscape/streetscape package that clearly illustrates all proposed improvements, inclusive of
revisions made as a result of the re-planning study for standard review by the City per Task 2.3
of the Basic Scope of Services. TT-WHS shall submit six (6) full-size and two (2) half-size sets
for the City's review purposes.
Task 5.6.9
Combine Document with Main ROW Proiect
Upon completion of the 60% design completion stage submittal and review process, the
consulting team will coordinate the full merging of the Re-planning Design Documents into the
Normandy Isle ROW Project documents. The Consulting team shall ensure that all disciplines
are properly collated and keyed to individual key maps, that match lines are properly
coordinated, and that the "combined" document demonstrates full uniformity and compliance
with the City's design standards.
TIME OF COMPLETION
Sixty percent (60%) drawings will be submitted within 16 weeks of receipt of authorization to
proceed. Other deliverables will be submitted in accordance with the schedule outlined in the
agreement between the City of Miami Beach and TT-WHS.
PAYMENT AND COMPENSATION
The method for calculating the fees for the aforementioned proposed engineering services (Tasks
5.6.1 through 5.6.9) is established in Exhibit 'B' attached, based on estimated labor plus direct
costs. The total fee proposed for this Scope of Work shall be on a not-to-exceed basis in the
amount of $58,220.00. Invoicing will be monthly and based on hourly rates as defined in the
current agreement between TT-WHS and the City of Miami Beach.
Page 4 of 4
Normandy Isle & Normandie Sud
10/19/2004
jD
t:
lD
%
)(
IIJ
t;
o
...
~
g
~
~
~
10
I.
~
I!
o ~
I
'"
ill ill jf "'
.. ~Il!l '" ~!e .. .. '" '" .. '"
N ::
!'l .. !'l I ~ ~ ~ 0 0 N N ::! !'l
.. .. N 0 '"
.... .... ....
~ :!l ~ ~i ~ ~
..; ..; 0 0 0 0 ~ .. N 0 0 ..;
.... .... ....
'" III II '"
.. 0 '" '" ~ ~ ~ '"
lii 0 I 010 0 0 lii N 0 T ~ ..
"' I III II [.. I "'
'" I l! ~ .. '"
,.; .. ~IN - N N N - ~ "' - o::r'~ "' '" ~ ,.;
S? .. ~
,
N
l! ~
'................OCONNN ..
~
III
000000000 .. ~
c
i
:! ..
::> ..
i! Il!
~ ~
e ex
;:;:
~
t
I I '" ~
I i!
I .. ~
w
I .,
"
::0
I 0 ..
= ~,iSCi~12i: ~I=. ! "'. ~M;! .. .. '"
... ..
~
g
0100 oJo'o 0 ....
;;; <
;;; u
000000000 '" ;;; <> '000000 ..
..
...
u
"
'" '" ~
~NOOOCOCD '" '" 00 'ltO...,fDODN .. '" ~..:!,~~ 51
.. N ;,; ~ N
C
"
!'l !'l ..
~~OOOOOO .. z i
...........0000 .. .. N .. ~ '" <D~OONN ..
.... .... ....
.... C
0
Z 1!il"UNN'"
:E "
II: .. ~ OO""INCONCDN ~ It 1:1 = ~
D .. ..; I ..; <~ "~~~I~~~ '"
.... C')l") _I .... ..." N ....
U "Z
... i ..
Ul
E 0 -...
~ II. II "u
D iil iil .... '"
;;) IDNOOOO.... ::! .. "t: C1DOON..,.CO :; ..
2fD lii 00'0000010 lii ~'" 8
Ul "u
""'11.........>- .'.~ z"
~l!!ii5cr~ ..<
OJ ~ :c'z ~ ~ II I 15'"
ill III U,)( '0 :E ...
.- 2'w 01 - '" I '" ~fd '"
'" '" .. '"
!:: E-'oa:~ _-I"'~NINO = " COCO N,CON....NN .. " 61 CD~~:2~CO ~ "
lD · ~"l!" ~ .. ~ ~
I Zu
% :E -= :> o'u. OJ lll~ .."
)( .... C 'tJ,Q' In III <
IIJ o - OJ jO .-
"'" > I 100000000
II U.-Ul,! Ii .."
.- ~ Ul OJ...
U Z'z ~ N u" ~
~ ..~
... OJ W 00'00000 .. on .. on OCCONNN =
~~ e ~ ~ Clz
,,<
"'" Ul L,.
W
II:
>- ~~
III ill :g
Ul 0000000 .. 00000000 .. on 000000 ..
... ~~ ~
Ul
W
;;)
a !C
W
II: m
..
J ~
...
~
Z
0
Ii:
g ;;;
u
.~ III
c
"
~
..
..
iI E t?:
1= II
., ~ ~
..
1:1- f
.. c
~ ==
'S
g" l'! "
0
u 0 ....Nt")..lOcg....oom
Ul Z :l cOlEia:icicillSa)cDlO
:z: " ~ uS uSU'i.,j U'jw;ujuSuS
~ ~ .. iHHUU
{!.
l: ....................................
i I ... ! 1.1, '
I ~ I~~~j . I
" .
... 1..~1.1 co
e .. ~
... -1:2.:;;
0
...
I I II) 1::5;~IE I
.. I
::l I
0 '"
"-
... Ie
, I e
I ...
l:?
...
e
Il 0000 ;0
.. -
W I
...
"
..
w '"
'" ...e! '"'
~ ..,.I~ ;:\
0
..
w 0
z
!2 N~~I '"
.;
:! ....
..... 0
0
Z
~ ..
...w
0: ...w =:0= ~
0 eZ ..;
l.l ti~ ~ N ....
I- w
E ~
A. i<t;
~ 0 lll~ :;J
e ~ i!ix ~CI~~ iil
I/) ""
.cA. ..>- z..
1.1 I! .0.. we
jIl i~~~~~ .....
.-.5'Cg~ Wl.l
l- E GO 0:'" ~~ N!~! ill
iii ftlcn.c 0- "'x ....
i~rlf~z'" Zu '0
: w..
>< 'O.5:~l!s~ o!e
IIJ II)
!;Ii; "'I~ 1/)8 .....
u~ :!!z Uw ~
w"
'0 W -.e 00== ,.;
0 oz -
- f~
.c 1ii
I~ w
0: 0:
>- .....
ID l.ll:? :il
l!! aM ClClCO ~
....
I/) "15
w
~
a
w !
0:
w
w
~
~
Z
0
t: I
ir
u
..
w JIIII
0
'"
~ c
I
~ ,(
r! c3,,!
4! It
" 1l f
~ !!
w
~ ~
...
~ 0 ..
~ z ..
'" ..
:E ~ ..
~ ~
I/)
..
d
z
::Ii
II!:
e
"
....
lI)
e ~
f'l!! Ie
aa. :;)
el en
.c D.&I'It >
: ~.. ol!i ~
ill. m u .!! ~I~ ~
._:1 1:: 0""
t: e.l:l:loll!:....
lD ....".cO...
~ i~'''z lii
~~-:it~J
,,:> U ~Iz
oll) w
:c~ ~
_ W
II!: II!:
>
m
I!?
UI
w
:;)
a
w
II!:
I 'II s
~I
~
l?
, II i II i i I
T~~ai i:
I li,lLoo1 '
10
,51
1=
,Ii;
I
I,
I
II
,..<"
PA
II
;'., I
II
;;;
o
<<i
i !
I
,;1
'\'\)\
,Ii
'I
t
~
.i
0000000 0
00000000
'"
~
"'
"'''OOI''~NN ll: '"
~
....o::roooooo .. !'l
..
....
llJU"OO""NN :2
C\lNOOOOO ..
,
!'l
"'
....
~
M
....
"'
!lDlI:lCOo::r..NCf)N .. M
.. ....
0000:0000 .. lil
g
I ill
lo::r..,.N....NNN.... = ..:
~
0101000000 ..
1D'lDo::rMNo::rN ,I:t
0'000000 0
.,
0>
g
00000000
..
:
.
.
a:
i
~
l>
..
~
~
t
~
2
..
..
..
<<i
oloooe.o::roo
=
l!l
0000'00000
!'l
..
....
o
OOO'O.....NOO
:!
~
M
....
'"
0'00000000 0 0>
g
"'
tro!il~-"o . '"
N ~
~
oLooooooo N
~
0 on
~
0 ~
000000000 :;;
!
..
~ ~-
~ ~
;;:
~
;
j
~
..
..
~
5
.,
~
e
..
..
0000000010
L
I~
o
J
.",
0000000
~
I
II
oo...,JO....CCGON
..
N
'"
'"
..
'"
o
~,< ^1
00...0000 ....
:;l
"'
....
I
~~oooooo :i
!'l
.0
....
OOCOCDNNO
:!
~
..;
....
,Ji
I
~
..;
....
,
~~o::rl~ION<ON
I
I
00000000
0000000
..
Iii
',",0
II
i- .-'
~
at
II
'J
on
~
o
'"
..
Iii
o
ia
!::
m
~
'"
'"
....
~
CCa:lNCOIN....NN =
i8
....
~
,
0011D ..,NNCI
:!
I
00000000 10
o
..
on
~
00000000 0
:ll
~
:
..
:
...
'0
l!!
I'll
E
E
:0
II)
o
:s
:0
-
II)
c:
...
l!l
.,
..I
C
...
o
...
..
0:
:>
o
%.
...
j!
e
...
c
!.!
0:
..
...
.,
000000 0
0:
~
~
o
....e:O..:!~~<D
0:
..
z
..
i/i
o
o::r~OOOO 8
0:
IL"
IL"
CZ
lii~
..
.. <o:e~~~1D
-...
0:.,
....
.....
!%
..u
zo:
..c
01 000000
ml;
~~
!p:
..Ii!
IiC
..
lit), ID~.;!~~"
...0:
u"
....
a~
f~
000000
...~
hllj
a..
0:0:
''is
000000 0
~
ii!
:;
..
..
~
....
..
*
~
~
..
..
0,
..
'"
..
~
N
..
:
!'l
.0
....
!
~
..;
....
o
~
5:
.
:!
on
<0
"
~
o
N
~
on
~
:ll
~
~
ti
..
..
~
g
..
"
a
~
~
I
"
E
l!
e
jD
I-
iii
%
~
,;
I:
J:
U 0 .
~ z wi
l! ~ ~
~
...
..
U
ii
w
...
U
o
0000100 0
..
w
IL
~
o
oJoooou =
..
W
Z
I>
iii
w
o
OOOONN :=
..
..W
..W
..Z
t;~
W
000000 0
-...
..U
Ww
w...
!f
I>U
z"
w..
o
00 ON"" o::r
.....
Wu
Ww
lSt:
"'''
Zu
W..
","
'"
o;O.OO<<lo::ro::r.... ~
.....
UW
w~
a",
....
"2
OOCONNN ::
.....
Ul!
alil
....
''is
000000 0
~
ii
~
o
..
'"
~
i
:.
<
;;
.!
'"
.
"
=
I
~
Oi
"'
'"
~
o
'"
<D
....
,.;
....
N
~
g
8
"'
'"
,.:
~
~
"'
~
III
;.?
I!!
11
ti
w
III
II.
~
l!
l!
I
i
"
"
,I 0-
i I 8 :: I
u
... ..
g .. ~
0-
~
::>
0
x.
...
g
...
...
11 ;;;
ii! 000000 ..
W
...
U
"'
W on
t: 0' ~OCOCOCl ':!l '"
~ ;,;
0
"'
W 0
z
<0 NOOOOO N '"
.,;
ij ....
W
... "
ci
z
::e "'
..w ~
Ill: ..w
C <z ~COOCID :l ..;
(,J ti~ ....
I- W
Ul
E 0
ll. -...
f! IOU
C Ww \;l
::l Wt: coooooo::r ::!
e !" 8
Ul <ou
.ell. .> z"'
~! dlO..,. w<
ia .!.e.!!! Zl~ g "'0- I,
::I" N Wu
.- 2 11 8'~ ..; Ww ~
I- iEt:
jjj ~ . .e 10 ... <Ox 011 NOOOOO N ....
'_~U€z~ ilil;! ~
: ::e 1110 ..
>< ..., c :: ,a'l!l '8 o!<
IIJ ~- Ii..el - .,
'" .- Ul
._~ C111-8 ..."'
(,J. Zz UW N
10 W w<O ~
~< 000000 ..
c oz
"'<
ii) "2
ii! W
Ill:
> ...0:
III Ul'! on
~ alil on
000000 .. ~
0:",
Ul ''is
W
::l
a
w m
Ill:
w
~
~
I'!
z
~
ii!
III
W
"
"
~
.;
.E
! !!
f
U i
:Ii
oll "
..
CII "
III
.,
l!! 0
I; z
"
~
(,J
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ROW INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
NEIGHBORHOOD 4: NORMANDY ISLES
DESIGN EFFORT FOR RE.PLANNING STUDY OF NORMANDY SUO
EXHIBIT 'C' . AFFECTED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHEETS
TASK SHEET NO. SHEET NAME
5.6.1 . Large Palms on North-South Streets LA 30 of97 Tree Disposition- Bordeaux
LA 32 of 97 Tree Disposition-Notre Dame
LA 33 of 97 Tree Disposition-Notre Dame
LA 75 of 97 Planting Plan- Bordeaux
LA 77 of 97 Planting Plan-Notre Dame
LA 78 of 97 Planting Plan-Notre Dame
5.6.2 - Organize Palms along Trouville LA 17 of 97 Tree Disposition- Trouville
LA 180f97 Tree Disposition- Trouville
LA 62 of 97 Planting Plan- Trouville
LA 63 of 97 Planting Plan- Trouville
iR 180f50 Irrigation Plan- Trouville
(HOURS ASSUMED at task 5.6.3) G-9 of 10 Sections
DM17 of 44 Demo Plans ( See Task 5.6.3)
CPG&D 17 of 44 Civil Plans - Trouville - 71 st
CPM 17 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Trouville - 71st
5.6.3- Revised Pavers Layouts 0.5 of 10 Paver Details
OM 6 of 44 Demolition - Trouville-Bay
DM90f44 Demolition - Bordeaux - Bay
OM 10 of 44 Demolition - Notre- Bay
OM 160f44 Demolition - Trouville - Biarritz
OM 17 of 44 Demolition - Trouville - 71st
OM 28 of 44 Demolition - Bordeaux - Biarritz
OM 29 of 44 Demolition - Bordeaux - 71st
OM 31 of 44 Demolition - Notre - Biarritz
OM 32 of 44 Demolition - Notre - 71st
CPG&O 6 of 44 Civil Plans - Trouville - Bay
CPG&D 9 of 44 Civil Plans - Bordeaux - Bay
CPG&D 10 of 44 Civil Plans - Notre- Bay
CPG&D 16 of 44 Civil Plans - Trouville - Biarritz
CPG&O 17 of 44 Civil Plans - Trouville - 71st
CPG&D 28 of 44 Civil Plans - Bordeaux - Biarritz
CPG&O 29 of 44 Civil Plans - Bordeaux - 71 st
CPG&D31 of 44 Civil Plans - Notre - Biarritz
CPG&D 32 of 44 Civil Plans - Notre - 71 st
CPM 6 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Trouville - Bay
CPM 9 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Bordeaux - Bay
CPM 10 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Notre- Bay
CPM 16 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Trouville - Biarritz
CPM 17 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Trouville - 71st
CPM 28 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Bordeaux - Biarritz
CPM 29 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Bordeaux - 71st
CPM31 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Notre - Biarritz
CPM 32 of 44 Pavm Marking/Sign - Notre - 71st
Exhibit 'C'-Amend 6 Sheet count-101404
Page 1
10/19/2004
5.6.4- Uplighting of Entrances E5 of 25 Lighting Plan - Trouville (partial)
E8 of 25 Lighting Plan- Bordeaux (partial)
E9 of 25 Lighting Plan - Notre Dame (partial)
E20 of 25 Lighting Plan - Trouville (partial)
E21 of 25 Lighting Plan- Bordeaux (partial)
E22 of 25 Lighting Plan - Notre Dame (partial)
E24 of 25 Electrical Details
5.6.5- Maintain more "Eclectic" Landscaping Pattern LA 6 of 97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 7 of 97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 8 of 97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 9 of 97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 10 of 97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 11 of97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 120f97 Tree Disposition - Bay Drive
LA 39 of 97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA 40 of 97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA410f97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA 42 of 97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA 43 of 97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA 44 of 97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA 45 of 97 Tree Disposition - Biarritz
LA 46 of 97 Planting Legend
LA 51 of 97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 52 of 97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 53 of 97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 54 of 97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 55 of97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 56 of 97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 57 of 97 Planting Plan - Bay Drive
LA 84 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
LA 85 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
LA 86 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
LA 87 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
LA 88 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
LA 89 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
LA 90 of 97 Planting Plan - Biarritz
TOTAL SHEETS AFFECTED BY REDESIGN 75
Exhibit 'C'-Amend 6 Sheet count-101404
Page 2
10/19/2004
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Exhibit "D"
City of Miami Beach
Right of Way Infrastructure Program
Neighborhood No.4
Re-Planning Study Construction Improvements
Absolute Value of Construction Changes
= additions + Icreditsl
$ 54,770
$ 64,580
$ 247,865
$ 90,550
$ 47,224
$ 504,989
$ 58,220
11.5%
Large Palms on North-South Streets
Trouville Esplanade Palms
Revised Paver Layout
Palm Uplighting
Eclectic Design for East-West Streets
Total Absolute Value of Changes
Design Fee for Changes
Re-design Cost/Absolute Value of Changes (%)
Affected Construction Document Sheets
Approximate Number of Affected Drawings
Tetra Tech (G, CPG&D, CPM, and OM)
Curtis & Rogers (LA and IR)
COM (E)
Total Affected Drawings
Re-design Cost per Affected Sheet
$
26
40
7
73
797.53
Re-design Hours
Approximate Number of Design Hours
Tetra Tech (G, CPG&D, CPM, and OM)
Curtis & Rogers (LA and IR)
COM (E)
Total Affected Drawings
Re-design Hours per Affected Sheet
260
421
82
763
10.45
Dollars Reallocated Due to Re-Planning Study
Large Palms on North-South Streets
Trouville Esplanade Palms
Revised Paver Layout
Palm Uplighting
Eclectic Design for East-West Streets
Subtotal for Construction
Design Fee for Changes
Total Net Changes in Project Cost
Net Changes in Project Cost
= additions. Icreditsl
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
44,080
(52,506)
39,881
90,550
(47,224)
74,781
58,220
133,001