Email re scriveners error
Message
Page 1 of2
Parcher, Robert
From: Mooney, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 11 :45 AM
To: Held, Gary; Parcher, Robert; Beauchamp, Lillian; Martinez, Maria; Williams, Mercedia
Cc: Gomez, Jorge
Subject: RE: Scriveners Error in SF Demo Ordinance
Bob, I have corrected the Ordinance; do you need to have re-form approved? Or can I just send
you the revised page?
-----Original Message-----
From: Held, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, December 29,2004 11:16 AM
To: Parcher, Robert; Beauchamp, Lillian
Cc: Gomez, Jorge; Mooney, Thomas
Subject: FW: Scriveners Error in SF Demo Ordinance
Please note. Planning will contact you to correct.
Gary M. Held
First Assistant City Attorney
City Attorney's Office
1700 Convention Center Drive - 4th floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
tel: 305-673-7000 ext. 6532
fax: 305-673-7002
~
-----Original Message-----
From: Mooney, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, December 29,2004 10:12 AM
To: Held, Gary
Cc: Gomez, Jorge
Subject: RE: Scriveners Error in SF Demo Ordinance
Was adopted on 2nd reading by the CC (8 Dec) and sent to Clerk on/about 17 Dec; I do
not know if the Ordinance has sent to the codifier.
-----Original Message-----
From: Held, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:06 AM
To: Mooney, Thomas
Cc: Gomez, Jorge
Subject: RE: Scriveners Error in SF Demo Ordinance
Tom: Has this been adopted on second reading? Has the clerk sent it to the codifier
yet? What's the status???
12/30/2004
Message
Page 2 of2
Gary M. Held
First Assistant City Attorney
City Attorney's Office
1700 Convention Center Drive - 4th floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
tel: 305-673-7000 ext. 6532
fax: 305-673-7002
IGl
~.~
-----Original Message-----
From: Mooney, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, December 28,20045:14 PM
To: Gomez, Jorge; Held, Gary
Subject: Scriveners Error in SF Demo Ordinance
The City Commission, as a floor amendment, reduced the previous
lot coverage maximum of 40% to 35%; however, the following
sections were not revised on the floor:
1. In the event the lot coverage of the existing structure exceeds 40%, no
variance shall be required to retain and preserve the
existing lot coverage.
2. In the event the lot coverage of the existing structure exceeds 40%, a
second level addition shall be permitted, provided it does
not exceed 60% of the footprint of the existing structure; no lot
coverage variance shall be required for such addition.
Thomas R. Mooney, AICP
Design and Preservation Manager
City of Miami Beach Planning Department
1700 Convention Center Drive
Miami Beach, Fl33139
phone: 305-673-7000 x6191
fax: 305-673-7559
tmooney@miamibeachfl.gov
12/30/2004
b. In addition to the development regulations and area requirements of Section 142-105. ofthe Land
Development Regulations ofthe City Code. the following shall apply in the event an Architecturally
Significant single family home constructed prior to 1942 is substantially retained and preserved. In
the event of a conflict between the provisions of Section 142-105 and Section 118-252. and the
regulations below. the provisions herein shall control:
1. The tota11ot coverage shall not exceed 35%.
2. The design of any addition to the existing structure shall take into consideration the scale.
massing. building orientation and siting of the original structure on the subiect site. and
shall be subiect to the review and approval of the Planning Department. in accordance
with the Design Review criteria in Chapter 118. Article VI. of the Land Development
Regulations ofthe City Code. The applicant. or any property owner within 375 feet ofthe
subiect property may appeal any decision under this subsection of the Planning
Department to the Design Review Board. in accordance with the requirements of Chapter
118. Article VI of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code. Any such appeal
shall be in writing. shall set forth the factual and legal bases for the appeal and shall be
filed no later than five (5) days from the date of approval by the Planning Department.
3. In the event the lot coverage of the existing structure exceeds 40%. no variance shall be
required to retain and preserve the existing lot coverage.
4. In the event the lot coverage ofthe existing structure exceeds 40%. a second level addition
shall be permitted. provided it does not exceed 60% of the footprint of the existing
structure: no lot coverage variance shall be required for such addition.
5. The property owner shall not be required to pay any City Building Permit fees associated
with the renovation and restoration of the existing single family home: any and all non-
City impact fees and other fees shall still be required.
6. The above regulations shall also be applicable to any single family home designated as an
historic structure by the historic preservation board.
c. Appeals. An appeal of any decision ofthe 8FRRB DRB shall be to a special master appointed
by the city commission, in accordance with the procedures set forth in section 118-537(b) of
these land development regulations. Thereafter review shall be by certiorari to the circuit court.
.cID.~ The following areas of work shall not require determinations of the planning director~ or
designee~ under this section: interior demolitions including plumbing, electrical and
mechanical systems, and renovations to the exterior of non-architecturally significant
structures, or non architecturally significant portions of a structW"e, provided they haT/e no
adverse impact upon the structural integrity of the building or the original arehiteetW"a1
design of the exterior, features and details.
(6) In the event the planning director, or designee, declines to approve a demolition request
under this section for any reason, the applicant may seek review by the single family
residential revie\v board (8FRRB),
J2} New construction procedures for single family homes demolished without required approvals or
permits.
11