Loading...
2000-23902 RESO RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23902 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THAT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY AMEND THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, THEREBY PERMITTING THE OPERATION OF THE ELECTROWAVE SHUTTLE SERVICE IN SOUTH BEACH FOR ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR, UNTIL MARCH 13,2001, AS EST ABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDED AGREEMENT, IF SUCH A DOCUMENT IS PRODUCED AND SUBMITTED BY THE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach wishes to continue operating its successful local transit service in South Beach, known as the Electrowave Circulator Shuttle Service; and WHEREAS, on December 3, 1997, Resolution No. 97-22597 authorized the City to enter into an lnterlocal Agreement with Miami-Dade County for the operation of the Electrowave; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 31-1 13.(m) of the Miami-Dade County Code, on March 13, 1998, the County executed an Interlocal Agreement with the City and issued a Certificate of Transportation to the Electrowave Service, for a period of two (2) years; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is subject to two one-year options to renew, by agreement between the County Manager and the Mayor and City Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City Commission hereby request that the Miami-Dade County Manager amend Article 8.1, Term of Agreement, of the lnterlocal Agreement between the County and the City, dated March 13, 1998, thereby permitting the operation of the Electrowave Shuttle Service in South Beach for one additional year, until March 13,2001, as established by the Agreement; and further authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Amended Agreement, if such a document is produced and submitted by the County. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 10th day of May , 2000. ATTEST: e6 LuJ CITY CLERK \/1 V - ( I 0\"\.l vc.............. APPROVED A'~ 'I FORi\A & LA.NGUl,C.E f!, r.:O:o E~ffl'"r! l"/",,;",~. ...: i . 1\.l\tl.., .} ) i\.,if\' F:\PLAN\SALLIAMELIAILOPES\lNTRLOCL. WPD 1/:~i /,;l~ s/;J;1L ~r~y D(f':' , "Unit Value for Bus Vehicle Revenue Miles for Urbanized Areas over 1,000,000" as reported in the table of Unit Values for Formula Grant Apportionments, published annually in the Federal Register. Example: a) If, during fiscal year 19X1, the Beach Shuttle operated and properly reported 400,000 Bus Vehicle Revenue Miles, a~d b) if, in federal fiscal year 19X3, the "Unit Value for Bus Vehicle Revenue Miles for Urbanized Areas over 100,000" was calculated using 19X1 reported statistics and published in the Federal Register, following the signing into law of 19X3 transportation appropriations, as $0.34472062, then c) the City would be entitled to 400,000 x $0.34472062 = $137,888.25 of the total formula funding apportionment to the County for 19X3. This is the City's attributable share of the total federal transit formula funds, in that these monies would not have been apportioned to the County without the inclusion of the 400,000 vehicle miles operated by the City. NOTE: Historically, apportioned funds are allocated to the County two (2) years after Bus Revenue Vehicle Miles are reported to federal government. 7.5 In the event that the Beach Shuttle operations contribute to an increase in State transportation funding, beginning with the first year in which service is reflected in State's reporting system, the County agrees to pay the City its attributable share, as defined in paragraph 7.4 above, of new or supplemental State Transportation Block Grant funding received from FDOT no less than sixty (60) days after funding is awarded by the State less any direct grants received by the City from the County for the Beach Shuttle. The State funding formula can be found at Section 341.052(6), F.S.. ARTICLE 8 TERMS, MODIFICATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 8.1 TERM OF AGREEMENT This' Agreement shall commence upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners and the Mayor and City Commission of the City of Miami Beach and the execution by the County Manager and authorized City representative and shall remain in force for two years thereafter. This Agreement is subject to two one-year options to renew, by agreement between the County Manager and the Mayor and City Commission. 8.2 RENEGOTIATION OR MODIFICATION Any substantive changes in the level of service to be provided by the City as set forth herein shall only be implemented after the County and the City have entered into a written agreement describing the changed services. C:IWTSU177::,AMIPROIJXJCS2MBSHITL2.SAM 10 --#_------~-,.~.,'"._-_.,~~.,,-~-"-~.."_._._...__. . -"-'-' ---- ------ -- CITY OF MIAMI BEACH CITY HALL 1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA 33139 http:\\ci.miami-beach.f1.us COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. ~S- 0 -0 C) TO: Mayor Neisen O. Kasdin and Members of the City Commission DATE: May 10, 2000 FROM: Lawrence A. Levy ~ City Manager SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THAT THE MIAMI- DADE COUNTY MANAGER AMEND ARTICLE 8.1, TERM OF AGREEMENT, OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, THEREBY PERMITTING THE OPERATION OF THE ELECTROWAVE SHUTTLE SERVICE IN SOUTH BEACH FOR ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDED AGREEMENT, IF SUCH A DOCUMENT IS PRODUCED AND SUBMITTED BY THE COUNTY. ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. ANALYSIS On March 13, 1998, Miami-Dade County executed an lnterlocal Agreement with the City of Miami Beach, allowing the operation of the Electrowave Shuttle Service in South Beach for a period of two (2) years, with a provision for two subsequent one-year extensions. The Administration was recently reminded that the City's request for renewal is outstanding and should be forwarded to the County Manager, via the Miami-Dade Transit Agency, as soon as possible. Pursuant to Section 31.113.(m) of the County Code, all municipalities are required to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the County and receive a Certificate of Transportation prior to operating any local circulator service. As previously stated, requests for one-year extensions are a formality which need to be accomplished each year. The Administration recommends approval of the Resolution. LLm F:\PI.AN\$ALLIAMELlAILOPEI:,\INTRLOCL. WPD AGENDA ITEM Ci V DATE 5-10-0u