HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-26313 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-26313
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, FOllOWING A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING
TO HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT ON SAME, AND HAVING CONSIDERED THE
CITY ADMINISTRATION'S RECOMMENDATION AND THE CRITERIA FOR
GRANTING REVOCABLE PERMITS PURSUANT TO SECTION 82-94 OF THE
MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE, GRANTING (IN PART) AN AFTER-THE-FACT
REVOCABLE PERMIT IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICANTS, MR. MICHAEL R.
BUCKNER AND HIS WIFE, MARGO BUCKNER, AS OWNERS OF THE
PROPERTY lOCATED AT 6120 lA GORCE DRIVE, FOR RETAINING THE
FOllOWING SPECIFIC ITEMS IN THEIR REQUESTED REVOCABLE PERMIT
APPLICATION CONSISTING OF: A PAVED WALKWAY; PAVED DRIVEWAY;
AND PORTION OF A WOOD DECK; All WITHIN THE ADJACENT APACHE
AVENUE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDED FURTHER THAT THE CITY'S
APPROVAL FOR REVOCABLE PERMIT, AS GRANTED IN PART HEREIN, IS
SUBJECT TO AND CONTINGENT UPON REMOVAL OF AN IRON GATE; TWO
COLUMNS; THE CANVAS CANOPY; AND THE HEDGES lOCATED WITHIN
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND RESTORATION OF PORTIONS OF THE PUBLIC
STREET END AFFECTED BY SUCH ENCROACHMENTS, WITHIN SUCH TIME,
PLACE, AND MANNER AS SHAll BE DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BY THE CITY'S
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.
WHEREAS, Michael R. Buckner and his wife, Margo Buckner (Applicants), own the
residential property located at 6120 La Gorce Drive (Property), adjacent to the City right-
of-way on Apache Avenue, which they purchased in April 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Property has encroachments consisting of an iron gate with two
columns; a Ficus hedge; a canvas canopy; and the corner of a wood deck; all constructed
on the Apache Avenue Street End, which is a public right-of-way leading to the La Gorce
Golf Course; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants, to retain the aforestated encroachments, submitted a
request for an After-the-Fact Revocable Permit, and have completed the application
requirements for same pursuant to Article III, Division 2, Sections 82-91 through 82-95 of
the City Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 82-93 of the City Code, on May 10, 2006, the
Mayor and City Commission adopted Resolution No, 2006-26187, setting a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the Applicants' request for the After-the-Fact Revocable Permit;
and
WHEREAS, at the request of the Applicants, the public hearing was opened and
continued at the July 12, 2006 meeting, and held on the September 6, 2006 City
Commission meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Administration, after reviewing the request for the After-the-Fact
Revocable Permit, and meeting with the Applicants and their legal representatives,
recommended that the scope of the requested After-the-Fact Revocable Permit be
reduced to include only the paved driveway; walkway; and the corner ofthe wooden deck;
with all other encroachments being removed; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, the Applicants agreed to reduce the scope of the
requested After-the-Fact Revocable Permit to include only the paved driveway, walkway
and the corner of the wooden deck, and further agreed to remove the remainder of the
encroachments on the City's right of way, at their sole cost and expense, and within such
time, place, and manner as shall be determined by the City's Public Works Director; and
WHEREAS, the Administration recommends that the Mayor and City Commission
hereby adopt the Administration's recommendation for granting an After-the-Fact
Revocable Permit for only the paved driveway, walkway and the corner of the wooden
deck, contingent upon the Applicants' removal of all other encroachments from the
Apache Avenue right-of-way, as provided in this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, that the Mayor and City
Commission, following a duly noticed public hearing to hear public comment on same, and
having considered the City Administration's recommendation and the criteria for granting
Revocable Permits pursuant to Section 82-94 of the Miami Beach City Code, hereby grant
an After-the-Fact Revocable Permit in favor of the Applicants, Mr. Michael R. Buckner and
his wife, Margo Buckner, as owners of the property located at 6120 La Gorce Drive, for
retaining a portion of a wood deck; a paved walkway; and a paved driveway; all within the
adjacent Apache Avenue City right-of-way; subject to and contingent upon removal of the
iron gate with columns, the canvas canopy and the hedges within the right-of-way, and
restoration of the public street end affected by such encroachments, within such time,
place and manner as shall be deemed acceptable by the City's 8 lic W rks Director.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 6th
ATTEST:
A YOR David Dermer
APPROVED AS TO
FORM & LA~GUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
~.P Ai; mkL
BAGENDA12006\reP0606IRe'O""'120L'G""'D<Re''''''b'ePe'''''Ros,.l. ( ~~ DGIe
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
A Resolution following a duly noticed public hearing held on July 12, 2006, to consider an after-the-fact
revocable permit request by Mr. Michael R. Buckner and his wife Margaret Buckner, owners of the
ro e located at 6120 La Gorce Drive.
Ke Intended Outcome Su orted:
Ensure compliance with code within reasonable time frame.
Issue:
Shall an after-the-fact revocable permit be granted for encroachments on Apache Avenue?
Item Summary/Recommendation:
Mr. Michael Buckner, and his wife Margaret, acquired the property at 6120 La Gorce Drive in April 2004.
Said property has encroachments within the adjacent Apache Avenue right-of-way, a platted street-end,
leading to the La Gorce Golf Course. The encroachments consist of an iron gate with two columns, a ficus
hedge, a canvas canopy used as a carport, a paved walkway, a paved driveway and the corner of a wood
deck.
Following a violation notice issued by the City's Code Compliance Division in January 2005, the Buckner's
removed the gate which was blocking the access to the east half of Apache Avenue and submitted an
application to the City for an after-the-fact revocable permit to allow the retention of these encroachments.
After review of the Reyocable Permit application, City staff was prepared to recommend denial. This
recommendation was discussed with the owners and their counsel at a second meeting. City Staff agreed
to recommend approval of a reyocable permit for the paved driveway, walkway, and a corner of the wood
deck contingent upon the applicant removing the columns, the carport canopy and the ficus hedges.
Following this meeting, the owners/applicants agreed to remoye the columns and the carport canopy;
however, they did not agree to remove the ficus hedges.
The Administration recommends approyal of a reyocable permit for the paved driveway, walkway, and a
corner of the wood deck contingent upon the applicant removing the columns, the carport canopy and the
ficus hedges.
The Administration recommends adoptinQ the Resolution,
Advisory Board Recommendation:
I N/A
Financial Information:
Source of
Funds:
D
OBPI
FHB
T:\AGENDA\2006\sep0606\Regular\6120LaGorceDrRevocablePermitSummary.doc
in
,."
MIAMIBEACH
AGENDA ITEM
DATE
R7L
'1-f;-Orc
m
MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www,miamibeachfl.gov
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Mayor David Dermer and Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager J-"~
Sept6,2006
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, FOllOWING A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC
HEARING TO HEAR PUBLIC COMMENT ON SAME, AND HAVING
CONSIDERED THE CITY ADMINISTRATION'S RECOMMENDATION AND
THE CRITERIA FOR GRANTING REVOCABLE PERMITS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 82-94 OF THE MIAMI BEACH CITY CODE, GRANTING AN AFTER-
THE-FACT REVOCABLE PERMIT IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICANTS, MR.
MICHAEL R. BUCKNER AND HIS WIFE, MARGO BUCKNER, AS OWNERS
OF THE PROPERTY lOCATED AT 6120 lA GORCE DRIVE, FOR
RETAINING SPECIFIC ITEMS IN THEIR REQUESTED REVOCABLE PERMIT
APPLICATION CONSISTING OF THE PAVED WALKWAY, PAVED
DRIVEWAY, AND PORTION OF A WOOD DECK WITHIN THE ADJACENT
APACHE AVENUE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY, CONTINGENT UPON REMOVAL
OF All THE OTHER ENCROACHMENTS, AND RESTORATION OF
PORTIONS OF THE PUBLIC STREET END AFFECTED BY SUCH
ENCROACHMENTS, IN SUCH MANNER AS SHAll BE DEEMED
ACCEPTABLE BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATION.
ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution granting an after-the-fact Revocable Permit for non-intrusive portions
of the existing encroachments.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Michael Buckner and his wife Margo purchased the property located at 6120 La Gorce
Drive in April 2004. Said property has encroachments within the adjacent Apache Avenue
right-of-way (See Exhibit "An), The encroachments consist of the following:
1. An iron gate with two columns (pillars)
2. A ficus hedge
3. A canvas canopy used as a carport
4, A paved walkway
5. A paved driveway
6. Corner of a wood deck,
Apache Avenue is a platted street-end in Beach View Addition Subdivision, as recorded in
the Miami-Dade County public records Book 16, Page 10. It leads to the La Gorce Golf
Course and is an access way to utility easements located at the rear of properties along
62nd Street.
A violation was issued to the property owners in January 2005 for the listed
encroachments. Subsequently, the owners removed the gate which was blocking access
to the east half of Apache Avenue, and requested that the process be initiated for the
granting of an after-the-fact revocable permit for the retention of the encroachments listed
above.
On May 10, 2006, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2006-26187, setting a
public hearing to review the request for the aforementioned after-the-fact revocable permit
on June 7, 2006, At the request of Mr, and Mrs. Buckner, the public hearing was opened
and continued to the July 12, 2006 and again to the September 6, 2006 City Commission
meeting.
ANAL YSIS
The initial application requesting an after-the-fact revocable permit, included the ficus
hedges, an iron gate, two columns, a canvas canopy used as a carport, a pave walkway, a
paved driveway and a corner of a wood deck.
The application and letter of intent dated March 15, 2006 (attached Exhibit liB"), was
submitted by Mr. Michael Larkin Esq. of Bercow and Radell, who is representing the
owners, The portion of Apache Avenue for which the after-the-fact revocable permit was
requested is depicted in the legal description of a sketch prepared by the applicants'
surveyor and encompassed 6,847 square feet.
The application for the after-the-fact Revocable Permit was reviewed by City
Administration pursuant to Section 82-94 of the City Code and the recommended action to
deny the request was discussed at a meeting held between the City staff, the owners and
their legal representatives, At second meeting with the Owners attorney, City Staff agreed
to recommend approval of a revocable permit if the following encroachments were
removed:
1. Columns (pillars)
2. Carport canopy,
3, Ficus hedges within Apache Avenue.
The recommended layout of Apache Avenue as proposed by the City Administration after
the applicants' removal of the above encroachments would require a revocable permit for
the paved driveway, walkway and corner of the wood deck as shown in Exhibit "C".
In a letter dated August 14, 2006, (Exhibit "0") the Owner/Applicant agreed to remove the
encroachment consisting of the iron gate, two columns, and the canvas canopy used as a
carport; however, they did not agree to remove the ficus hedges claiming these hedges
existed before they purchased the property.
The reduced scope of the revocable permit area which was submitted in Exhibit "0" above,
was finally sketched out with a legal description by the applicants' surveyor and submitted
to the City to accompany the new reduced scope, This sketch and legal description,
depicting the use of 2,059 square feet of the Apache Avenue right-of-way is attached as
Exhibit liE".
The Administration's conclusions following this revised request of the revocable permit
application, with a condition for the removal of the hedges, are as follows:
1) That the applicant's need is substantial.
Satisfied. The applicant's property is a triangular/irregular shaped lot with no
driveways, carports or a garage. It is densely landscaped and built up and does not
have additional space for parking. Moreover, parking on La Gorce Drive is restricted,
while street-ends are generally permitted for residents' parking. Therefore the need
to use this street-end is substantial to the applicants for their parking needs.
2) That the Applicant holds title to an abutting property,
Satisfied, The applicants are the fee simple owners of the property located at 6120
La Gorce Drive which abuts the Apache Avenue right-of-way and for which the After-
the-fact Revocable Permit is being requested.
3) That the proposed improvements comply with applicable codes, ordinances,
regulations, neighborhood plans and laws.
Satisfied. Provided that all the intrusive encroachments located within the public
right-of-way are removed and the area is restored to a condition acceptable by the
City, this condition will be satisfied. Additionally, the items for which a revocable
permit are being sought must be permitted after the revocable permit is granted, The
permitted items will be required to comply with the applicable codes and regulations,
4) That the grant of such application will have no adverse effect on governmental/utility
easements and uses on the property.
Satisfied. There are no existing utilities within the modified requested revocable
permit area, and as such this will not have an adverse effect. In the event such use is
required in the future, the City or utility company shall use that area and any
restoration work shall be borne by the applicants/owners.
5) Alternatively:
a) That an unnecessary hardship exists that deprives the applicant of a reasonable
use of the land, structure or building for which the revocable permit is sought
arising out of special circumstances and conditions that exist and were not self-
created and are peculiar to the land, structures or building involved and are not
generally applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district and the grant of the application is the minimum that will allow reasonable
use of the land, structures or building.
Satisfied. As mentioned previously, the property, consisting of an 11,000 square
foot irregular lot constitutes a special circumstance for the Applicants to
reasonably park their vehicles on the property due to lack of driveways, carports
or a garage,
b) That the grant of the revocable permit will enhance the neighborhood and/or
community by such amenities as, for example, enhanced landscaping, improved
drainage, improved lighting, and improved security.
Not Satisfied. The modified request for after-the-fact revocable permit being
sought serves and benefits solely this property owner.
6) That granting the revocable permit requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied to other owner of land, structures or buildings subject
to similar conditions,
Satisfied. The granting of this Permit will not confer on the Applicants a special
privilege that is generally denied to others. The City's policy is to maintain street
ends for public use and utility accommodations and hence the use of this street end
for a paved area for vehicular access or parking lies within the general intended uses
of such right-of-ways.
7) That granting the revocable permit will be in harmony with the general intent and
purpose of Article III of the City Code, and that such revocable permit will not be
injurious to surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the
public welfare.
Satisfied, Granting a revocable permit for the items in the modified request is in
harmony with the general intent of Article III of the City Code, and will not be injurious
to the neighborhood and public welfare,
CONCLUSION
The Administration's analysis above shows that 7 of the 8 criteria are satisfied and hence
the Administration recommends and supports the granting of an after-the-fact Revocable
Permit for
· The paved walkway
· The paved driveway
· A portion of a wood deck within the adjacent Apache Avenue City right-of-way.
However granting of the after-the fact revocable permit shall be contingent upon the
removal of all the other encroachments including two columns, an iron gate, a canvas
canopy, the hedges and restoration of the area to a condition acceptable by the City.
The City Administration recommends that the City Commission adopt the attached
Resolution.
JMG/RM/FHB/RTH/FA V
T:\AGENDA\2006\sep0606\Regularl6120 LaGorce Revocable PermitMemo.doc
:D,-
1 N 3 ~ 3 ^ V d
11VHdSV
-;-
N
o
III
r--
>'l
'V ) tl V
s S 'V ~ 8
J
o
If)
r--
I")
,-: .~
:~' . .': ~(ri)(~t69t.lOi>:..;>}jiMo~:jNQ:r"'.g~. ' ". :'
o
x-
::0;
0'
...
-
~
........
-
0::
........
w
::>>
z
w
~
w
:z:
u
e
a.
e
"
z
0
...
e
en
... .
Z .
w C
:E
:z: .
.
u l-
e -
0 aI
II: -
U :c
z ><
w
... w
e
"
w
...
...
-
Q
W
-
U.
-
...
Z
W
Q
-
o
o
LI1
N
.
N,
.....'
-,
~~
,.:'
(~
~
BERCOW & RAOe:LL
ZONING. L^ND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL LA'^'
DIRECT LINE. (305) 377-6231
E-Mail: MLarkin@BRlonlngLaw com
VIA HAND-DELIVERY
March 15, 2006
Mr. Fred Beckmann, Director
Public Works Department
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Dri ve, 2nd Floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Re: Revocable Permit Application in connection with Property located at
6120 La Gorce Drive, Miami Beach. Florida - Letter of Intent.
Dear Mr, Beckmann:
This law firm represents Michael R. Buckner and Margo Buckner
(" Applicants"), owners of the above-referenced property ("Property"). Attached
to this letter please find the necessary submittal requirements, including a survey
of the Property, a sketch of the adjacent Miami Beach Right-of-Way, opinions oE
title for the Property and the adjacent Right-of-Way, an application and a check
for the processing fee, The following letter will describe the Property and the
Applicant's requested use of the adjacent Miami Beach Right-of-Way,
Description of Existing Property and Right-oE-Way. The Property is a
triangular shaped parcel lying west of La Gorce Drive and south of West 62nd
Street. A single-family home, built in 1947, occupies the Property. Immediately
adjacent to the north and west of the Property lays the entire length of Apache
Avenue, an unimproved City of Miami Beach Right-of-Way (" Apache Avenue").
Apache Avenue is approximately 60 feet wide and 230 feet long. Apache
Avenue begins at the intersection of W 62nd Street and La Gorce Drive, runs
diagonally to the southwest, and terminates at the property border with La
Gorce Golf Course. See attached Sketch of Apache A venue.
The City of Miami Beach owns Apache Avenue by way of a plat entitled
"Beach View Addition," recorded in Plat Book 16, at Page 10 of the Public
Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida, and dated April 8, 1925. See attached
Plat, The Plat dedicated Apache Avenue to the City of Miami as of July 3, 1925.
EXHIBIT "B"
WACHOVIA FI"tAHC~ CENTER. 200 SOUTH BlSCAvNE BOULEVARD. SUITE 850. MIAMI. FLORIDA. 33131
PHONE, 305.374.5300 . FAX. 305.377.6222
Mr. Fred Beckmann
!\1arch 15,2006
Page 2 of 5
See attached opinion of title prepared by Samud Spencer Blum, Esq. Since the
time of dedication, Apache A venue has remained unimproved,
Apache Avenue is a small dead-end RO\\!. It was never platted to go
through the Golf Course and the La Gorce Golf Course will remain for the
distant and foreseeable future. Apache A venue is not needed as a roadway, If
improved it would serve only two properties, the two single-family homes to the
east and west, Both of these homes were built facing other existing roadways as
if Apache Avenue did not exist.
Description of Existing Encroachments. Currently, the Applicants utilize
a portion of Apache Avenue as a driveway, The paved driveway sits north of
the residence, extending from the west side of La Gorce Drive to the center of
Apache Avenue. An iron gate, suspended between two posts, lies across the
driveway and a canvas canopy used as a carport is located at the western end of
the driveway, Part of a paved walkway, which extends south along the rear of
the residence from the western edge of driveway to a wood deck, and a small
corner of the wood deck jut out into Apache Avenue,
Further, the Applicants maintain landscaping in Apache Avenue. A ficus
hedge follows the north border of the driveway and then extends to the
southwest along the center line of Apache A venue to the property border of La
Gorce Golf Course, The open land situated within the perimeter of the ficus
hedge is covered with grass.
Proposed Use of Apache Avenue, The Applicants intend to continue
using the Property as currently utilized. The Applicants do not propose any
additions to the existing encroachments,
Satisfaction of Criteria. The Applicants satisfy the criteria for granting a
revocable permit listed in the following subsections of the City of Miami Beach
Code Section 82-94.
(1) Applicant's Need Is Substantial.
The Applicants' need for the permit is substantial. Maintaining the
encroachments subjects them to possible code enforcement. Further, denial of
the permit will deprive the Applicants' of a place to park as they may not park
along the right-of-way of La Gorce Drive,
BERCOW & RADELL
ZONI..... LAND U.. AND ...V....ON........T...L LAVV
1\1r. Fred Beckm<1nn
March 1ST 20U6
Page 3 of 5
(2) Applicant Holds Title to an Abutting Property.
The Applicants hold title to the property abutting Apache Avenue. See
the attached opinion of title tor 6120 La Gorce Drive,
(3) Proposed Improvements Comply with Regulations.
Except for their location on the public right-of-way, the existing
encroachments comply with all applicable regulations,
(4) Grant of Application Will Have No Adverse Effect on
GovernmentaVUtility Easements.
Granting the permit will not adversely effect any easements on or uses of
Apache Avenue. Apache Avenue is unencumbered by any easements, such as
water and sewer. See the attached opinion of title for Apache Avenue. The City
of Miami Beach is not using Apache Avenue for any purpose at this time, Nor
has the City made any use of the property since at least January 1967 based on a
review of aerial photographs of the area on file with the Miami-Dade County
Public Works Department,
(5) Alternatively: (a) Unnecessary Hardship Exists Depriving Applicant
of Reasonable Use of the Land Arising out of Special Circumstances,
or (b) Grant of Permit Will Enhance Neighborhood.
A special circumstance exists that the denial of the permit would deprive
the Applicants of a reasonable use of the right-of-way. The driveway for the
Property has historically been located in its present position. Aerial photographs
on file with the Miami-Dade County Public Works Department indicate that, at
least since January 1967, the driveway for the Property has been located just as
today, north of the Property in Apache Avenue. This situation represents an
unnecessary hardship because if the permit is not granted the Applicants will be
deprived of the traditional means of access to their property,
The reason for the placement of the driveway off of the Property is
unknown. However, the combination of the location of the lot and the shape of
the lot may have compelled the placement of the driveway on the unused right-
of-way. Of the numerous lots in the surrounding area, the Property is the only
Jot that is triangular-shaped and sandwiched between two intersecting rights-of-
way, Therefore, the circumstances are peculiar to the Property and the use of
Apache Avenue is not generally applicable to other lands. Only one other
residence abuts Apache Avenue, 400 W 62 Street located to the west, and the
BERCOW & RADELL
.-:0,....... LAND U.. AND -NV'''QtIoI'''''.NTAL LA.
~1r. Fred Beckmann
March] 5, 2006
Page 4 of 5
Applicants' use of the right-of-way in no \vav deprives that property of anv
current or future use of Apache Avenue.
Further, the Applicants did not c-eate this special circumstance because
they became the owners of the Property in April 2004. At a minimum, the City of
Miami Beach has not used Apache Avenue for municipal purposes for over 39
years. During this same period or longer, the City has allowed the use of Apache
Avenue by the prior owners of 6120 La Gorce Drive as a driveway, Furthermore,
the possibility exists that the City has never used Apache Avenue since it was
platted in 1925,81 years ago.
The issuance of a revocable permit by the City will permit the applicants
to have a reasonable use of Apache Avenue,
(6) Granting Permit Does Not Confer Special Privileges.
As stated above, only one other residence abuts Apache Avenue, and if
they wish, they could also request a revocable permit for use of the western half
of Apache Avenue. Therefore, granting the permit will not confer any special
privilege on the Applicants that would otherwise be denied to others similarly
situated in the same zoning district.
(7) Granting Permit Will Be In Harmony With Code and Not Injurious
to Surrounding Properties.
The Applicants seek continued use of a portion of the right-of-way that is
not being used either by the City or the public. Therefore, granting the permit
will not adversely impact the surrounding properties and neighborhood and will
not in any way be detrimental to the public welfare.
Summary, Granting the requested revocable permit will be in harmony
with the intent and purpose of the Code, and will not be injurious to the area
involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare, The permit will provide
the Applicants with a reasonable use of the right-of-way without harming
anyone. Based on these reasons, the Applicants respectfully request your
favorable review and recommendation of this application.
BERCOW & RADELL
aOo......... LAND U.. ANa .NV'''ON''.NTAL L.A"""
Mr. Fred Beckmann
March 15,2006
Page 5 of 5
If you have any questions or comments with regard to the application,
please give me a call at (305) 377-6231.
Sincerely,
/Yf!~
Michael W, Larkin
cc: Mr. & Mrs. Michael and Margo Buckner
Mr. Matthew Amster
BERCOW & RAoELL
.ON,,,,.. LAND ..... ......0 ....v..O.........T..L. LA""
z
o
i=
a.
a:
o
en
w
o
...J
<t:
CJ
W
...J
~~~g
! :~8
OIOW
INWO
~:~?cii
:S~~~
~:~~e
0.. ...o(fJ
~9~i;
~ :s~~~
~~5O:~
:~Q.~o
~~~~~
g~e~~
~~~~~
~~~2~
~i~~~
~ oQ..u
~..c~I-%
wt=:'<w
~:J:2icilll
~:$!-~
f(:~gg
<co>ca...
~~~
~ 1010 ~~ . -I")r...
~~ >% -r... ~o:~~~~O
~~:~S~ ~8~~~;~:~~~
~~~~S~~~~~~3~~~w~~
!~~~~~~~~~~...~~~~~~
::~~~q:~:~:~:~:~~e
9~;~~~~~~~;~:~~BaE
~~~~~e~~~~~~~9~;;;
b ~NQ.~~O~~~WI-...;~W~
-I:S~ t:;~g:S1- .-~;;; ~5~ a:g 2i :tj
~~~~~g~~~=:~~:;~~e~
",Q.Ea~8~o~o~~~~~~~~~
O~:~~~~O:~:~~~~~b~~5
~~:J:.ZUO~"'~I-_o:~?~?gtn
~~~g~~;~~~B~;~~~a~~
~~~~;~~.~~~e~~~~~~:,
~~a~:~a~~a~e~~~~~~i
5~~~~~o:<(~~~~~~~CC~~
:ea;~ge~~~;~~~~~~~8
~~~~s~~~:~g~~8~~~~~
~~<(~~"'~O~~8~1-~~~~~i
z~~~<(o~~~Cb~~~O:O:O:O:8
~~~es~i~~~~~~~eeeelll
exll.W
~ ~~08
fil ~::l ~f'! ~ ~!:lt
il!<.. Ol... E . ~::Jg~
.. ~ ~~~~ ~~ Ii! i:i~ ~~C5~
~ ; ~~>-i C;~ b ~~ ~ U;!t;
~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~
~ '" ~~~:i ~~ 1i!!E~ ~~ o!~C~
f'! ~ ~~~~ ffi~ ~i!!;:;!l! ~~ S~~il
~ i ~~~~ @ I~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~:~
IoU < ~~2S0 < (I) ~~~.... ~? E6~1-
g~i~ "i:~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~@!l!~ ~!li~;!
..ill ~ol~ ~ ..< i.(~!>:~:;l" ::~i:~
~~ffi "6" ffi c~ ~~~O~~~ ~ ~~
~;~Ji~~ ~ :~~ 8~~~U~"i~~~
"'~~c!5~~ O:j .~.. ~!l~~6~ ~~::i
!~i~~~~"g ~~filU~ ~~~!j~~~ u~"' u
>0 '!!lz12S<:lQ ~...i!!Z~ - g;",~~~~< !1l
"b~mo~",ffi~ oe~~~~ ~i~.. ~~ ~Ol~
~g~~~~12ie ~eeo~~ ~~~~ =" ~~~~<
~~~!~~~e~ ~~~~~! 12~i~!; ~~~~,
~~~~~~.. ~ ~f'!~~~~ ~ ~~ ~z <~ ~
~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~.. ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~II
~ =e-5'~S'~ 8...!:A" ~~
~ _N ~ ~ ~ ~~;~2
tJ ~
~!o.,~
::'l: ~'el :::
~~!lI:~
~;:;;""'!:l
~:';~jj;j
~~i!: c
~~~~
;:! ~ it: ",,'
S "i~
~~::::~
~.::j~~
"'e::.
""''''
~~
<!.oI.
~~
~~
e::.e::.
~t:lff')
!il',~
~~~
~~~
&
(M/~ ,SL)
3^180 38808
~-
'-
~1)J1/,"" 4,/, ...... ~
'~A <:Y ..~
~ - ffy <09) "'!.<,
~ ~.t I ...~
~ 701>:. ""oS'
..(.t/v. s, ~ Qlfy
0" '700 OdfoO ~
C" :, ~Ob: :;>df ~
......J 0'. 0 '-
0)<9.9" ,11yb: '- '-
. <9' 71y '-
< <oj
1 N 3 ~ 3 ^ It d
10.5
"tt.60.LtN
lO.Zl=.
'OO'Sl=tl
..6S,ZS.c;1I'=O
z
o
-
~
l:l.
~
U
~
..-.:i
Q
~
<
~
..-.:i
~
s~
l:l.
:;;
o
u
u
<
o
~
=~
U ~
~
~
rr;
~
~
~
\fl
IlltHdSIt
J
o
I/)
,..:
'"
a
I/)
"-
'"
It 3 ~ It
S S It ~ ~
.(t'lK~).a9Iioi
o 10~
N N_::>
cD - .0V)
,. :'<000
g~~~
ffi~~~
a:::
-a!:i
.....a.-<(
9 :i
i
I
I -<(
I
I N
:.<
I u
0
...J
CD -<( ~
I N ".... 102
La..N_:)
..... ~ 0- .0
I "-'
0 ".... a:::~C)O
...J Ck: LAJOQ.L&J
..... "-' ~g.o~
I 0 "0
C! :;;(CD_O
..... :::IE '
I w III wNai:i
w N
..... a:::~a:~
I 0 9 i
IX!
Ol
I ~
a:::
w
I :I:
.....
a:::
I 0
2
w
I 1=
~ ~5a
~~i
..:
('~'S).~S' LS 3.00,00,005 (~)(a),09'6
w
U
2
W
o
Vi
w
a:::
~~df~
Ss",
0-"
. N
~S~re
(() ~o;~o
LlJ ~ z
0 ::::)
~ -.J
'; a: O. III
0 r0-
C) LL ~
tf
-.J I
0 ~
:5
~/~~'-J
.....J '-' ~ '-' '-'
" I
1 N 3 ~ 3 ^ V d
IlVHdSV
'0
III
.....
I"l
'V ] tl V
S S 'V ~ 8
.
IX:
Q
III
U
IX:
o
(:)
c(
...
o
N
....
CD
:'~ ..;>:-.....:, ':;': ;/' ;': ~(ri}(~J.69tlOi>:..;>!j~M-. :.ONl:lO~...9~':
<( >-
o loI-
N ~~3
~ ~ci8Vl
Uo... 0
o wO::
...J .00
1Il<D<(U
~Ow
. 0::
~~~
Oo...~
...J ::E
w
u
:z
w
o
Vi
W
0::
P-.)o-p-
SSp.
3'"
P-.)QI.b-
SSJ>::
3'"
..........
..........
~
C
=
<(
I
N
:..:
U
g
CD
N -
I- ~
0 .......
-
..J [l::
.... .......
0 a
I- 0
w Lfl
w
.... N
0
<Xl
Ol
~
c:::
w
::c
I-
0::
0
Z
W
::I:
l-
.
N,
,.
-,
~i
...
(~
.~D..~
ci:::~ :3
.0........... ..
a..;::~~
('lra).tQ' ~S :3.00,00.005
llJ CO
0 ::>
) a: -.J
0 O.
(9 IJ...
-.J
:5 0
C)
o
III
.....
I"l
III
:>>
z
III
~
III
:z:
U
c(
a.
c(
(:)
Z
0
...
c(
Q .
III .
> U
0
:IE .
.
III I-
IX: -
III m
III -
0 ::r:
... ><
Q W
III
Q
Z
III
:IE
:IE
0
U
III
IX:
tn
...
Z
III
:IE
:z:
u
c(
0
IX:
U
Z
III
.'.
o
z-
::>:
0:
...
.J
BERCaW & RADELL
ZONING. LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
'.~..J
I,: 27
1'1
, .
, " r
." i '.'. ~.,
DIRECT LINE: (305) 377-6231
E-Mail: MLarkin@BRZoningLaw.com
August 14, 2006
VIA HAND DELIVERY AND EMAIL
Mr. Fred Beckmann, Director
Public Works Department
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Drive, 4th Floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Re: Revocable Permit Application with regard to portions of Apache Avenue
Right-of-Way adjacent to home located at 6120 La Gorce Drive, Miami
Beach, Florida -Amendment to Application
Dear Fred:
We represent Michael and Margo Buckner ("Applicants") with regard to
the captioned application. The Applicants have agreed to reduce the scope of the
above application to the parameters discussed at our meeting with the City
Manager. See Attached Sketch, At the same meeting, the manager asked that the
Applicants agree to the following three conditions of approval:
1. remove the columns at the eastern end of the Applicants' driveway;
2. remove the carport canopy located in the middle of the driveway;
and
3. remove the hedges situated adjacent to and on the center line of
theoretical and unimproved Apache A venue.
The Applicants are agreeing to remove the columns and the carport
canopy. With regard to the condition concerning the hedges, please note that the
Applicants did not plant these hedges. This is obvious based upon the size of the
hedges and the date, April 2004, on which the Applicants purchased the single
family home adjacent to the unimproved Apache Avenue right-of-way,
Moreover, based upon the reduced scope of the application, the Applicants will
have no control over this area of Apache A venue, Since the Applicants did not
plant the hedges, it is inequitable to request that the Applicants remove these
EXHIBIT "D"
WACHOVlA FINANCIAL CENTER. 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 850' MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131
PHONE, 305,374,5300 . FAX, 305,377.6222
Mr. Fred Bechman
August 14,2006
Page 2
hedges from the Apache Avenue right-of-way. Therefore, the Applicants are
declining to accept the third condition of approval.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you, staff members within
your department, and members of the City Administration in order to resolve
this application in a manner in which everyone can support, We believe the
Applicants are proceeding in good faith by reducing the scope of the pending
application and by accepting the conditions of approval relating to the removal
of structures that are adjacent to the Applicants' property. Please call me at
(305) 377-6231 if you have any questions or comments with regard to the
foregoing. I look forward to seeing you on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 at
the City Commission hearing,
Sincerel y,
/1#f1J~
Michael W. Larkin
MWL/so
cc: Jorge Gonzalez, City Manager
Fernando Vazquez, City Engineer
Gary Kokorian
Bob Middaugh, Assistant City Attorney
Jeffrey Bercow, Esq,
F:\Data\Docs\Buckner, Michael, Mr. and Mrs\Letter to F. Beckman 081106.doc
BERCOW &. RADELL
ZONING. LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL L.AYV
z
o
-
f-<
Q.,
~
U
r'-J
~
Q
~
<
~
~
~
>-
z
<
Q.,
:;;
o
u
u
<
o
f-<
:z::~
u
E-o
~
r'-J
z
o
t
a:
U
U)
w
o
...J
<(
t9
w
...J
%....~
i~~~
~.;~ IJ
o I QW
1..........0
~:39~
C1tg~:io
~:;~~
a.. ...01(1
~S~~;
!5~@;
~~t-A:~
~;~~~
~i~~~
g~~~~
U%u....i=
!o!o~
~~!e:
~i~i~
a~~~~
~ 5 ~;:
~:.-c e
: ;~I~
> ~h~
~~ ~~ ~e ~~~~~~5
~~c~~~ ~t~..~~~;~~~
~~~c~~ ....~~8~~~:~~f
c~~~~t~~g~:~?~~o~w
~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~
g~~E~gt~~~e~~~Sc~;
~~e~z~~:~~~~~:~~~~
-~o~f""~~:~~~~~~~2~
g~~:z~~g~~~~;~:::~~
~i~~~8~~~~~~~~eeee~
:~~g7g~a~:~~~e~~~~~
oC::~:~~~:~~~~~b~~5
~o%czuo~....wt- C1t~~-o8~
~:t-I c~:~o~.::oe..~~~b';;
8~E~o!wu~_~~.sw~~~~
~~~C;~~c~;~e~~~~~~:
!;a~~~;~:5~e~~~~~~i
g:~5~~.c~~~~~~~6~~~
~o~w.oe~u~""ow""w.....wwo
~:~a....uw~c~,~~~~~~~~
:~~:~~~~~~g~~~~:~~~
;~i~~O~~~~~~~~~:~~~
~~~e~~i~~~~~~~e~eem
10'l,;
"tt.60.UN
~
"{ -e)..)
:> i ~ (M/'d .~L)
~ ~ 3^180 38808
J~~_
1 N 3 Vol 3 ^ '<I d
~
~
~
t
~
11
~ ~
~~
.!:l
7 :1
~ ~
~ t
II
""
~
-(,{~ So ~
o~ '70.) 00-0 '-,
c-~ ;, .Jo,.?.J.y
-Y.) <:I , "0
O~.l>!)~ . //r~
v, (Y. ;f/r
<' ~o~
)0 ~E~~
fil ~ ~ :a .. ;o~8
~ w ~ ~g E _ ~~i~
? ~ili<:i;o !l!2 o~:a c1ic;
l.l.l - !f-Zt 1-11:: "' wi= !.100llo:
~"'L~_; ~9 _J;,i=~?:~il~
~ ~... fi~~~ ,,<5 - z _ -s:~-
~ ~c~> o~ ~~:Jl!:is ~...!i:i
~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ fil~i ~~ ~15~~
g e ~~j~ ffi~ fii~:~ ~~ 5E~<
~ ~ ~~<~ Q ~~ 2~i? ~~ ~~~~
~ I ~O~g ~ ~~ ~:~~ ~~ B>!~
~ ,W ..... ~ (I.. IX X' t.J U'l \.l.I 0: l- Z Q /.\I, I~ I ~ .
0>", "I="'O::! !i;C :it;!o,,",:!!o ~";;;..
~ffig ~~~~ ~ ~~ "~~~i;~ r~i=~
~~fil ~"G" ffi o~ ~~~C:Jl~~ ~~~~
j~~ ~i~~ ~ "'8! ~~@~~~ ~~~ili
ize...~-o~ c. :". u"~"~f~~.5
~~~~~~~ffi~ i~ ~~9 ~~<~o~ ilif~5
b~~2!l!~~~8~ o~fii5;og ~~~Qlffig U t
~< f-~o ~X!z< .:z~ il.l~ ~
~t~~~~~~L 5~~~~~ ~i~~ ~~ ~ e
~~~;o~:;~5!'; ~tlj!!c;~!i: O~j~I=1= .,.~~~<
1!~ie~~i~ ~~;~~~ ~~i~ ~~ ~~~~,
~i:~~~~..~~ ~gh~fil ~~~! >~ ~ g
; ~~h~!hh~~I~!1 ~~n!~ i -'~ -,,>-- U
I !!I!I:n!I!~~!!il!!!!!;1 Ill! ~Il
~
~ z;!
0:.. i
~~~
~::Sil
-~"'I~;
I I- 61-
G~:~U
oj.
;z ~~
~U
~.
u ...
~I-.~
:'l:"tj:::::
~~!lI;'I:
;itS::~~
"'!&l~ilI;
ei.i!: c
lo.l~~~
~ ~ ~!'o<"
;;;j~"i~
~~::::;:s
~:;::::~
C>.e:>
.......
"'....
~~
~:
~w
<=Ie:>
~~~
~..~
~~:
~~~
~h.
..
'v'l
11'<lHdS'<I
I
'0
"!
,...
'"
'0
LI)
,...
'"
'<I 3 ~ '<I
S S '<I ~ ~
.' - -', -(VlH};l).6g: LO'-l
>l:t~M<d'NQ::f,.g' "
"
o
N
<0
""
< >-
lo~
N_::>
- ,Olll
lw::ClUo
U<>' 0::
o .~o
~~~~
. 0::
-aj~
1-<>.<
o -
..J ~
I
I
I 1
I N
lw::
I 9
III
I N
I
I
l-
I ~
I :i!
Ol
! ~
w
I ~
o
I ~
I ;:
~
i=
~~
w
U
Z
w
o
Vi
w
'"
I-
o
..J
....
o
..-,
::E
.......
,....
!::S
"6
o
Ll'l
N
<( >-
lo~
L&..N_~
0- .0
o::><:ClU
LlJU.:LL..J
~9cD~
;;:lD_O
::li . .
wNm~
Q:I-c.:..c(
o -
...J ~
s~a
a;~~
~.z
~
(-~'a).~8-1; 3.00,00.005
(~)(a),OS:l'6
~
~
~
w
()
a:
o
C)
en
~
.-J
o
l.L
.-J
o
QC
f'l
'O:t
~
I
~
)
:5
II
BE.RCOW & RADELL
.'. i'
ZONING. LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
DIRECT LINE: (305) 377-6231
E-Mail: MLarkin@BRZoningLaw.com
_.1,) 1._.
f-- : ,~ '-'.
... J i 1 _: ~; LJ
_.li..- ,'.';'. ;, ~'f';~~:~ ,r
VIA HAND-DELIVERY
August 30, 2006
Mr. Fred Beckmann, P.E., Director
Public Works Department
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center Drive, 2nd Floor
Miami Beach, Florida 33139
Re: Revocable Permit Application in connection with Property located at
6120 La Gorce Drive, Miami Beach, Florida - Alternative Permit Area.
Dear Mr, Beckmann:
This law firm represents Michael R. Buckner and Margo Buckner ("Applicants"),
owners of the above-referenced property ("Property"), Attached to this letter, please
find a sketch showing a smaller portion of the right-of-way for inclusion in the revocable
permit application, Specifically, the alternative encompasses three (3) areas in the right-
of-way: (A) the corner of the wood deck; (B) a portion of the sidewalk; and (C) the
driveway. The alternative reduces the area of the revocable permit request by 70% from
6,847 square feet to 2,059 square feet. We will present the alternative sketch to the City
Commission at the hearing on September 6, 2006.
We firmly believe that the original and alternative areas for the revocable permit
satisfy the criteria enumerated in the City Code and will not be injurious to the area
involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. If you have any questions or
comments with regard this matter, please give me a call at (305) 377-6231.
Sincerely,
~Iv~
MichaelW. Larkin
Attachment
cc:
Mr. Fernando Vazquez, P.E. v'"
Mr, Gary Kokorian
Matthew Amster, Esq,
EXHIBIT "E"
WACHOVIA FINANCIAL CENTER. 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD. SUITE 850. MIAMI. FLORIDA 33131
-. '_"'r'" .,n.:: o::a7A I;~nn. FAX. 305.377.6222
. ~
lH ~J~
H~ ....:oj
p~ ~n ~
~~ ] J. i I
~~:iJ ~l~;
~!;!~:s 1!"'J!~
-~.". I1lB..~
!~j~ !'!H
1.~_-5 '" 8i8.J
-!a:l,!~ ~~ui ~
fiH 1~J.j
1] ~ H.~.h
j-:;l ~ !tH
gJ~P ~ri~
flf"~ ~HJ
,8'6l 'i~ ~ B,n~
...h.JIt p ~8.';
.Jcf~18 Ao8-!z~
. ]]
~-! ! ~
~.r.rl~
x.'j 81'
l.r..,;~
,P;'81oi
tlGf.. -
-.... - J1
!HJj~
!I'!!l!iid.
l~BJi"~
'8~ lit" r
I~ ]J ~
jJ I.b ~
~"'1l11l.!l'
.illlJ! 8
~ i~:~~
"UfRI
l~ ~ ~.li.!
AoU"'ii :z:fis
fll....~g~;:l: ~~ ~
~~~~e~~~s~~ ~~ ~~
~ _5tE~~e~s~~~~~j ~j
~i~g~~aijf~j~~~~~~~~;~~
j&!.5 E.s = ~ ~ r~ ~ !: ... ! ~ 8 t ~ ~ ~ s ~ ,.1;
~ ~] E = B ; ':i '0 tl ~ ~ s t: e ; i ~ ~ ~ ~ .; !
~~f:-:JJ1~:ie2e~'O..~eb1~
~!~~~~~i~~~~~;~3~sj~!!s!
J'1 ... is 8 ;: ~ ~ 1/'; -: j ~ ; i... " r ; &. +
- 0 - '" "! :J :.. ~ b 1.2 '7 'ij - .. ~_ .. c;: .. ~
i~Jf~~~~~~~rliJ~ji~j~;
<' 8..e~~.!::I... ~";:; ...soJ ~ l:] 1I.!!.5
~",..~~:l~~ ~e~ .$>_~~..!~5
-~Jl~~li..~'1ii~l1~'~~i~i
~s.~z""~~te_.1i~~_~c~_~.
il t: F.'" f!'= ~s rtl-!.5.s t ~.sOii tl !IO_tO
.... ,g , ; ~ ! ~ n ~ q ~ l ~ ~; ~ > ~.&
'~!1i~z~~....z~i~.z'l1.j
.J"':J.!.:.1.r 5t1J!:-z:1-a 11i:ec..r:;f
"Il:::foIlll5~J; '" lOii-~ E""..".S".ll
iA1:!"&.~'O ~~~.~~; i2,g I; a; r8.~'O
1i-li~.~a~S1 .:._.,1i_ ,~,~
Bj.e s rs f.! ~ ~1!~ giJ~ ~5.2 ~ II ~t
8ol;i!lj~B~ii~~~i~r:Ji~
i~~c~se~~1~.e!5~ :1ii~:
~ loo,.! ~ II t .. g.... ~ .9 .i .. .,..... 1Ill~ 41 ..... h. a "
~~Ei2~!..r~~~~olw~:~s~e~~
~i~.1iR..&>~...; ..~~~~.~
~ .. - - Cl e &..2 0 l! 5 'u:; J ~ :! i! ... It ~ ~
~t~~~~I.~.8 .~ .~.~.~-.
'~-!~J:~!~Hdr~ p~~i.~~~
~"b~1is~~~~a~~~~.~~S!j~.
"j-5~.2 ~t.. 1lO:a"! ~ i8~~!-jh!l ~~ ..!:~
11 r~.~!h'~5!E':a:a!~~irl'~:;i~"
i ~~l~z.21J~~1~lJ~~18~~~a
,
~e ~ ::15
~ i '5:!~
-~'. ~. :~g
!'i ~
o i -., tl...;
I, ~.i ~~ r;~
~~ ell: ~i ~ ~!lS
Ei iM ~p ih
~~ .~!i.[! !~i
f' j!;Ej'e If'
"! rlj_ W -.
J: 11i3~;i
. -..!.ri
H ~~;~. .
i; f~tii~~
.. 'II l.........w
Ii I~~:!!~
~. "':I'I~
H ULII'~
.~ ~~n' ~
a."e>>~~l!o
~I~:mm
!
I
M.
U
<CZ~ Eo
(J)_N U
o (9-~V~\f)g
Z z 01~7~1
CL >= '''''~,.!.~
CI) w 9~;'~'~
w > D::~I/')-e
--J cr: tii~C~ ~
u.J ::J =...: .. ~~
=>CJ)CQ~~x..2
C)O~:i~~S
::2: ~ S; 0. .~
....J '" .
:1l
~
~
<
.
~
"
,
~
; a'
w ~
S!~! I
n; i
JiLl i
"--2" !i
;ii!f "!a
u;31~ l~!
==:fza 3;~
~ .W ""~
<.~ I h-
~ii!~ I;:
i=~U~i!1
U;~i~!:"
:~~VhH~
'i' ~'i"':;' z 'i' ~'i
~
(M/'d ,~L)
+^~80 :38808 Vl
1 N 3 V1 3 ^ 'v' d
~
1?Jl;~ 0t--&
""- '.1fy -0
""- ~ 9,)
""- 'lyO/Y-
-{-<'<It", ~ ""- 0'1- '
cO, 00 0&0 ""- LY
, o~ .)02.)& "-
"'0 v - ""0 "-
0>09 9, . /",
<- 09./'1",
.to)
z
o
-
E-<
p..
-
~
U
rJ)
~
o
....l
<
C)
~ :;00,
~ N~~
00....
)-of ~'f?jt
Z II'"
,,0
<
~
~
o
u
u
<
o
E-<""
::r:
U
E-<
~
~
rJ)
"
""-
""-
""-
ll'v'HdS'v'
o
'"
.....
'"
'v' 3 'd 'v'
S S 'v' 'd ~
.... '" . (V1K~);69'LO\
< >-
0 ~o~
N
--:::>
<D ::.:c.:i8Vl
""
uo.. 0
w o w'"
U ...J "00
Z [Dt.O<(u
W -ow
0 - '"
Vi -cri-
.:::E
W >-0..<
a:: o -
-' :::E
""-
""-
""-
""-
/
/
'j
""-
""-
I
"0
'"
r-:
'"
. - ".;.,~' ,
.....
I
I
I <
I
I N
""
I g
lD
I N
I g
I i:;
>-
I ~
I a;
'"
I ~
a::
I ~
o
I ~
I ~
~
c
z:!
::>0(
ez
---.
::::;:
........
cr
........
< >-
l..i...~o~
0--:::>
o::~c>8~
~ga..wa::
z-' "CO
_ml.Oc:(U
<( -ow
:::E' a::
wNai-
a:: .::Ii
....0..<
o -
-' :::E.
o
o
<t"l
N
$~:l
O':.......r'o!
::J::
(V1)(0),09'6
<C:lDU'
" I I Nc..~
~~gg'~~~
CL~::~):~