HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-26368 Reso
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-26368
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH,
FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
RELATED GROUP OF FLORIDA AND THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH CONCERNING LITIGATION
OVERCERTAIN PARCELS IN THE SOUTH POINTE
AREA OF MIAMI BEACH, INCLUDING BLOCK 1, AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE SUCH AMENDMENT, AND THE TAKING OF
SUCH STEPS AS ARE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE
FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION THEREOF.
WHEREAS, East Coastline Development, Ltd. ("East Coastline") and West Side
Partners, Ltd. ("West Side"), among others (collectively known as the "Porto fino Entities"),
initiated litigation against the City of Miami Beach (the "City") and the Department of
Community Affairs in various actions (the "Lawsuits"); and
WHEREAS, the Porto fino Entities have conveyed certain parcels involved in such
litigation to certain entities that are part of the Related Group of Florida (collectively known and
referred to as the "Related Entities"); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission on February 25, 2004 approved in concept, a
settlement of the Lawsuits proffered by the Porto fino Entities and the Related Entities, which
conceptual settlement is set forth in a Term Sheet attached to Resolution 2004-25509, as
amended since such resolution to reflect the intent and agreement of the parties; and
WHEREAS, the City, the Porto fino Entities, the Related Entities, and the Miami Beach
Redevelopment Agency, on July 28, 2004 entered into a Settlement Agreement to avoid the
expense, delay, and uncertainty of lengthy litigation, and to resolve such proceedings under the
terms set forth in the Term Sheet, and the City Commission approved a Concept Plan according
to which development on the properties subject to the Settlement Agreement would follow; and
WHEREAS, the Related Entities have obtained Design Review Board approval on April
4, 2006 for a proposed development on Block 1, subject to the City Commission approving
changes in the Concept Plan, because the proposed development deviates from the approved
Concept Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has referred the proposed changes to the Concept
Plan to the Planning Board for that Board's review of such changes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the proposed changes and approved them
subject to the following: (a) the required setback between new building and Taverna Opa should
be respected and if there is some unused floor area, [foregoing this floor area] would create a
greater public benefit, and (b) there should be a greater public benefit negotiated with the
developer other than the open space being proposed. At a minimum some financial mechanism
in perpetuity, such as a trust should be created independent of the developer, but funded by the
developer, to ensure that this open space is adequately maintained and operated in a manner that
enhances the public good; and
WHEREAS, the Related Entities have negotiated with the City an Amendment to the
Settlement Agreement that addresses the requirements of the Planning Board and the City
Commission concludes that it is in the City's best interests to approve the Amendment to the
Settlement Agreement and the Amended Concept Plan affecting properties the Related Entities
owns as successor to the Porto fino Entities on Block 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
That the City Commission hereby approves the Amendment to the Settlement Agreement, in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A," however, the Amendment is subject to the
final review and approval of the City Manager and City Attorney. The Mayor and City Clerk are
hereby authorized to execute such Agreement on behalf of the City, and the City Manager and
City Attorney are authorized to take such actions as are necess 0 appropriate consistent with
the intent of this resolution to implement the provisions 0 t e endment to the Settlement
Agreement. This Resolution shall take effect immediately 0 i dopti n.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 11 tl1<lay of Dc to r
A~kP~
CITY CLERK
Robert Parcher
APPROVED AS TO
RM AND LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
~
DATE
F:\atto\HELG\LITIGATI\Alaska\Block I 2006\TRG Oct 11 AGENDA Settlement Agreement Amendment adoption reso
rev.DOC
2
COMMISSION ITEM SUMMARY
Condensed Title:
Two Resolutions amending the Concept Plan and Settlement Agreement between the Related Group
and the City of Miami Beach concerning litigation over certain parcels in the South Pointe area,
includin the ro e known as Block 1.
Ke Intended Outcome Su orted:
Increase satisfaction with development and growth management across the City.
Issue:
Should the Concept Plan and Settlement Agreement be amended?
Item Summa IRecommendation:
On July 28, 2004, the City of Miami Beach entered into a settlement agreement with various entities known
collectively as the "Portofino Entities" and certain successors in interest that are part of the Related Group
of Florida. As part of this settlement the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-25651 which
approved a concept plan for various parcels in the South Pointe area including a parcel known as Block 1.
This concept plan was formulated after an exhaustive public process which involved not only the
Commission but the City's Planning Board, the Design Review Board and the participation of
neighborhood representatives which became known as the Collaborative Process.
TRG-Block One, Ltd., one of the entities as successor in interest to the original settlement, is
requesting modifications to the Concept Plan.
At the April 11 , 2006, the City Commission discussed the request from TRG-Block 1, Ltd., regarding the
previously approved Concept Plan. The request is summarized as follows:
. Modify the Concept Plan for the area known as Block 1;
. Initiate the necessary amendments to the City Code to effectuate the Modified Concept Plan;
. Release of subsurface easement rights to the alley located in Block 1 for the purpose of creating
certain underground improvements.
The Administration recommends a rovin the Resolution.
Adviso Board Recommendation:
At its June 27, 2006 meeting, the Planning Board recommended approval by a vote of 4-0 (3
members absent .
Financial Information:
Source of Amount Account Approved
Funds: 1
D 2
3
4
aSPI Total
Financial Impact Summary:
Ci Clerk's Office Le islative Trackin :
Jorge Gomez or Tom Mooney or Gary M. Held, City Attorney's office
Si n-Ofts:
Department Director
Assistant City Manager
City Manager
\
T:\AGENDA\2006\oct1106\Regular\Comm Summ Block 1 settle agr and concept plan 101106.d
~
'lIIIIIIIr
MIAMIBEACH
AGENDA ITEM R7 B
DATE~
e MIAMI BEACH
City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
Mayor David Dermer and Members of the City Commission
Jorge M. Gonzalez, City Manager 9.---y
October 11, 2006 (J
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN TRG-ALASKA I, LTD.,
TRG-ALASKA III, LLC AND TRG-BLOCK ONE, LTD. AND THE CITY OF
MIAMI BEACH CONCERNING LITIGATION OVER CERTAIN PARCELS IN
THE SOUTH POINTE AREA OF MIAMI BEACH, INCLUDING BLOCK 1,
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SUCH
AMENDMENT, AND THE TAKING OF SUCH STEPS AS ARE NECESSARY
AND APPROPRIATE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION THEREOF.
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CONCEPT PLAN FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY TRG-BLOCK ONE, LTD.
ON BLOCK 11N SOUTH POINTE; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE A TERMINATION AND ABANDONMENT
AGREEMENT REGARDING THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE BLOCK 1
ALLEY; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A
RELEASE OF SUBSURFACE RIGHTS REGARDING THE NORTH
PORTION OF THE BLOCK 1 ALLEY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolutions.
BACKGROUND
East Coastline Development, Ltd. ("East Coastline") and West Side Partners, Ltd. ("West
Side"), among others (collectively known as the "Portofino Entities"), initiated litigation
against the City of Miami Beach (the "City") and the Department of Community Affairs in
various actions (the "Lawsuits").
The Portofino Entities have conveyed certain parcels involved in such litigation to certain
entities that are affiliates of the Related Group of Florida (collectively known and referred
to as the "Related Entities"). The City Commission on February 25, 2004 approved in
concept, a settlement of the Lawsuits proffered by the Portofino Entities and the Related
Entities, which conceptual settlement is set forth in a Term Sheet attached to Resolution
2004-25509, as amended since such resolution to reflect the intent and agreement of
the parties. On July 28, 2004 the City Commission approved Resolution No. 2004-
25650, authorizing the execution of a Settlement Agreement with the Portofino Entities,
the Related Entities, and the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency, to avoid the
expense, delay, and uncertainty of lengthy litigation, and to resolve such proceedings
Commission Memorandum - Related - Block 1
October 11, 2006
Page 20f4
under the terms set forth in the Term Sheet, and the City Commission approved a
Concept Plan according to which development on the properties subject to the
Settlement Agreement would follow. The Related Entities have obtained Design Review
Board approval on April 4, 2006 for a proposed development on Block 1, subject to the
following: approval by the City Commission of: (a) modification of the Settlement
Agreement and Concept Plan; (b) release of subsurface rights to the north % alley on
Block 1; and (c) amendment to City Code to allow transfer of floor area across the alley,
or transfer is otherwise approved by the Planning Director under existing City Code
provisions. .
The originally adopted Concept Plan provides for the height limit on the affected
properties to not exceed 40 ft. fronting the street (actual concept plan reflects
approximately a 30 ft. height fronting the street) and stepping up to 75 ft. for that portion
of the structure that provides a 20 ft. setback, above the 40 ft. height, from the property
line.
The original Concept Plan depicted Related's properties within the Block developed as .
three parcels:
The South parcel, which includes the portion of the vacated alley, has retail/commercial
uses fronting South Pointe Drive. Residential uses front Ocean Drive and Collins
Avenue cladding a three story parking structure with one parking level below grade. An
ilL" shaped tower rises above the parking and pool deck area up to the maximum height
of 75 feet.
The Northeast parcel reflects residential uses and a lobby on the ground floor fronting
Ocean Drive, a parking structure along the alley and a slender, six story tower rising up
the height limit of 75 feet.
The Northwest parcel consists of a modest two and one half story residential building
over a one story parking area.
The City Commission referred the proposed changes to the Concept Plan necessary to
develop the properties pursuant to the DRB-approved plan to the Planning Board for that
Board's review of such changes.
The Planning Board reviewed the proposed changes and approved them subject to the
following: (a) the required setback between new building and Taverna Opa should be
respected and if there is some unused floor area, [foregoing this floor area] would create
a greater public benefit, and (b) there should be a greater public benefit negotiated with
the developer other than the open space being proposed. At a minimum some financial
mechanism in perpetuity, such as a trust should be created independent of the
developer, but funded by the developer, to ensure that this open space is adequately
maintained and operated in a manner that enhances the public good.
The Related Entities have negotiated with the City a First Amendment to the Settlement
Agreement that addresses certain conditions of the Design Review Board and the
Planning Board, and the City Commission concludes that it is in the City's best interests
to approve the Amendment to the Settlement Agreement.
The City Commission previously approved the vacation of the south portion of the Block
1 alley, and the release of subsurface rights in the north portion of the Block 1 alley,
Commission Memorandum - Related - Block 1
October 11, 2006
Page 3 0'4
conditioned upon compliance with conditions and costs of relocation of easements or
provision of an equivalent easement as required by any and all utility companies
occupying the alley and/or obtaining letters of no objection by such utility companies,
and certification by the Public Works Department that such subsurface rights were not
required for future subsurface utilities. The Department has provided such certification.
The forms of the Termination and Abandonment Agreement with respect to the south
portion of the Block 1 alley and of the Release of Subsurface Rights regarding the north
portion of the Block 1 alley submitted by the Related Entities contain such conditions and
the City Commission concludes that it is in the City's best interests to execute the
Termination and Abandonment Agreement and the Release of Subsurface Rights.
ANALYSIS
TRG-Block One, Ltd., one of the entities as successor in interest to the original
settlement, is requesting modifications to the concept plan as follows:
South Parcel - Residential uses are removed from the ground floor of Collins Avenue
with the exception of a recessed lobby entrance. The shape of the tower is changed into
a "quarter circular" form. The parking structure is reduced by one floor, including one
level below grade. A subterranean service tunnel below the alley connects the parking
area to the Northeast parcel. Additionally, a pedestrian connector at the second floor
over the Taverna Opa property connects this parcel to the Northeast parcel.
Northeast Parcel - The gross floor area is increased by approximately 13,000 square
feet. This floor area is a transfer of the development rights of the Northwest parcel. The
resulting FAR for this parcel increases from 2.0 to 2.75. The parking structure is
expanded by adding a full subterranean level, connected to the South parcel as
described above, and expanded across the alley to connect with a subterranean parking
area below the Northwest parcel. The residential tower is increased in width to
accommodate the expanded floor area.
Northwest Parcel - The developable floor area of 13,000 square feet (lot area=6,500 x
2.0 FAR) is transferred to the Northeast parcel. A subterranean parking level is added
and connects below the alley to the Northeast Parcel. At grade, the lot is developed as a
green space / private park accessible to the public, with the necessary ventilation
equipment for the garage below.
On April 4, 2006, the Design Review Board approved a condo-hotel project that
comprises the lots in Block 1 owned by TRG-Block One, Ltd., bounded by Ocean Drive,
1st Street, Collins Avenue, and South Pointe Drive. The subject
approval includes the subterranean parking garage, which will connect the parcels
together below the shared alleyway, as well as an open park on the single lot located at
the northwest corner of the block.
An elevated bridge, connecting the two structures on the east side of the site, is
proposed to span the site currently occupied by Taverna Opa Restaurant at 40 Ocean
Drive. In light of the fact that an owners affidavit for the Taverna Opa property was not
included in the application, the DRB continued this portion of the project to the May 2,
2006 meeting, in the event such connector bridge cannot be approved by Planning
Department staff. Prior to such meeting, however, the owners affidavit was provided to
staff, and that portion of the project pertaining to the connector bridge was removed from
the May 2, 2006 DRB agenda and approved by staff.
Commission Memorandum - Related - Block 1
October 11, 2006
Page 4 of 4
The First Amendment to the Settlement Agreement provides for the following
modifications to the Settlement Agreement:
(1) the Concept Plan would be permitted to be amended from time to time with the
approval of both the Related Entities and the City Commission;
(2) TRG-Alaska I, Ltd. would acknowledge receipt of a concept plan for public facilities in
South Pointe Park as set forth in the BODR approved by the City Commission on July
27, 2005 and pursuant to Resolution 2005-25978. The City would need to provide
written approval of the project cost as submitted by TRG-Alaska I, Ltd. and its contractor
and provide a notice to proceed for TRG-Alaska I, Ltd. and its contractor to begin
construction by no later than March 30, 2007, time being of the essence; failing which
TRG-Alaska I, Ltd. would be released from any and all obligations to build such public
facilities otherwise required by the Settlement Agreement;
(3) upon receipt of final approvals for the modifications to the Concept Plan outlined in
this memo and corresponding amendments to the land Development Regulations and
receipt of an initial building permit for the development of the project on Block 1 as
contemplated by the Modified Concept Plan, the Related Entities would contribute One
Hundred Seventy Four Thousand Six Hundred Dollars towards the City's Beachwalk
Project or other public project south of Fifth Street;
(4) starting on the date that construction activity for the Block 1 project commences and
continuing until that date that is two (2) years thereafter, the City shall provide to Related
for construction staging purposes no less than 1,320 square feet of public right-of-way
for construction staging, which at Related's request shall be as contiguous as reasonably
possible, located immediately adjacent to the Block I Parcel. In exchange, Related shall
pay to the City the aggregate sum of Twenty Six Thousand Four Hundred and no/100
Dollars ($26,400.00), payable on the same day that the contribution required under
paragraph 3 above is due. If Related requires additional construction staging area
and/or final certificates of occupancy have not been issued by the end of such two (2)
year period, then at Related's request the City shall provide such additional land (to the
extent available) and/or extend such two (2) year period in exchange for payment by
Related to the City of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per square foot per annum.
CONCLUSION
The City Commission should (1) approve the First Amendment to the Settlement
Agreement and Modified Concept Plan and (2) authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute the Termination and Abandonment Agreement and the Release of Subsurface
Rights, subject to the final review and approval of such documents by the City Manager
and City Attorney. The City Manager and City Attorney should be authorized to take
such actions as are necessary or appropriate consistent with the intent of the resolution
to implement the provisions of the Amendment to the Settlement Agreement, the
Termination and Abandonment Agreement and the Release of Subsurface Rights. The
Resolution should take effect immediately upon its adoption.
T:\AGENDA\2006\oct1106\Regular\TRG Alaska Memo to City Commission re Amendment to Settlement Agreement(v3)
rev GMH.DOC
Via Hand Delivery
March 29, 2006
Mr. Jorge M. Gonzalez
City Manager
City of Miami Beach
1700 Convention Center
Miami Beach, Florida 33130
Re: TRG-Block One. Ltd.
Dear Mr. Gonzalez:
Please let this correspondence serve as a formal request by TRG-Block One,
Ltd. to be scheduled to appear before the City Commission at the April 11, 2006
scheduled meeting. As you are aware, the original "concept plan" for Block One
was previously approved by the City Commission on July 28, 2004. TRG would
like to appear before the Commission to seek approval of a modified concept plan.
The modifications to the site plan include: the addition of a park in place of a
building on one of the lots; underground parking; a slight curve in the
condominium-hotel building: and a minimal increase in the width of the
condominium building. A copy of the original concept .plan and the modified
concept plan are attached for the Commission's review.
TRG respectfully requests that the Resolution presented for approval by the
Commission include an aclmowledgement of the propriety of an amendment to the
City Code to effectuate the modified concept plan and aclmowledgement of the
necessity of a release of subsurface easement rights for the purpose of underground .
parking by lRG. .
Exhibit "A"
TRG acknowledges that any amendment to the City Code must first be
presented to the Planning Board and then presented to the Commission for fmal
approval.
If the modified concept plan is approved by the Commission, TRG agrees to
work with the City to draft an easement in a mutually acceptable form to facilitate
the underground parking prior to their appearance before the Planning Board.
Please advise if there is any additional information necessary to facilitate
this request or any additional documents required. Thank you for your anticipated
attention to this matter.
Ene.
ce: John K. Shubin, Esq.
Matt Gorson, Esq.
Joyce Bronson
Gc~~ ~l{. t+EL~<? )
(g- ,ffl1d1pu.e~fs
2
426
a
o
---
ell
l
en
r::
C\1
-
a..
.....
c.
Q)
(,)
r::
o
o
,...
~
o
o
-
a:J
o
427
o
. I
I
e
i
_ ,!!'1~_
If
,I
--..,~---
I
I
I
I
I
I
--- ______J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
---~
I
co
....
It)
...
..,.
...
SOU,-H POl",TE. ORl"E.
428
1I111~l*
I i
I I I Ii!
1!i .D.~[!,JI
o
o
_M_. ell
I :r I !
a: ~ .... '. ... ..........'.' I
6 :~,' -',,".'
~I
8j
m2
"0
Q)
>
o
....
m
;'-.."
---
l t t t t t 1/1/
!1l1!1
fD
t::
.,....
~
I:
t
429
I I
I I I I ~ I
IDlliJ[)1
fD
t::
.,....
9
I:
j
.
.,....
.,....
iP
.
CD
-
-
-
~
i
o
C\)
i
I
I
';;'.-'
"::'" I
., I
,....;;
:~:.......
---
~
_-----------------~.r------------------'
soUtH PO\N,e OFUVe.
430
.
co
....
....
....
o
o
o
l
------------------~-------------------'
SOUTt"4 poU'-ITe DF""e
431
~
o
,
o
It
~I
Bi
CD::E
~.. "'" G
':'.: I ~
:: I ~
i
I . '1<.' . ,.....
:.- ~.~.'
";-.fIj'.I'<
---
~(UtU
fg
.,....
.......
.,....
.
U)
.,....
.......
.,....
fg
.,....
.,....
en
c:
t
~ !D
t Uti t Uti
432
III/I ~~
o
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, BY AMENDING SECTION 114-1,
"DEFINITIONS," CLARIFYING THE MEANING OF "SITE;"
AMENDING CHAPTER 142, "ZONING DISTRICTS AND
REGULATIONS," ARTICLE II, "DISTRICT REGULATIONS,"
DIVISION 18, "PS PERFORMANCE STANDARD DISTRICT,"
CLARIFYING THAT FLOOR AREA MAY BE DISTRIBUTED ON
BLOCK 1 THROUGH COVENANTS IN LIEU OF UNITY OF TITLE;
PROVIDING FOR REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Beach entered into a Settlement Agreement on July 28,
2004 with various entities known as the "Portofino Properties" and certain successors in interest
that are part of the Related Group of Florida; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-25651 which approved
a concept plan for various parcels in the South Pointe area including a parcel known as Block 1;
and
WHEREAS, the Concept Plan was fonnulated after an exhaustive public process which
included citizen review and numerous public meetings and workshops through an ad hoc
committee of concerned citi;zens and has also been reviewed by the City staff, the Planning
Board, and the Design Review Board, all of whom have recommended approval thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Concept Plan for the Block 1 Properties as that term is used in the
settlement agreement and/or related documents, has been modified and the "Modified Concept
Plan" has been reviewed by the City staff, the Planning Board, the Design Review Board, and
citizens, all of whom have recommended approval thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Modified Concept Plan has been approved by the City Commission
through the adoption of Resolution No. , passed and adopted on the _ day of ----J
2006; and
WHEREAS, the developments on the Block I Properties contemplated by the Settlement
Agreement and Concept Plan require certain changes to the City's Land Development
Regulations; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is being adopted to allow impleinentation of that Modified
Concept Plan through the adoption of certain changes to the Land Development Regulations to
permit the development contemplated in such Modified Plan to proceed; and
WHEREAS, this amendment to the Land Development Regulations was not required by
the Settlement Agreement but was independently determined and recommended appropriate for
Exhibit "B"
adoption by the City staff and the Planning Board, based upon public input after public hearing,
following all requirements of procedural due process attendant thereto; and
WHEREAS, the Property in Block 1 affected by this amendment is described in section
142-698(4) as follows: "The "Block 1 Properties" shall mean Lots 1-3, 5-13 (and alley adjacent
thereto), 17, Block 1, Ocean Beach Florida, PB2, Pg38, Public Records of Miami-Dade County."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. Section 114-1, "Definitions," is hereby amended as follows:
The following words, terms and phrases when used in this subpart B, shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
*
*
*
Site means a parcel of land considered as a unit, capable of being occupied by a use
permitted in this subpart, possessing a continuous or unbroken boundary not divided by a public
street, alley. right-of-way, private street, or waterway. Except for properties which are involved
in the transfer of development rights where the site is that property within a project that has been
approved under chapter 118, article V.
*
*
*
SECTION 2. Chapter 142, "Zoning Districts And Regulations", Article II, "District
Regulations", Division 18, "PS Performance Standard District", Section 142-698, of the Land
Development Regulations, is hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 142-698. Commercial performance standard area requirements.
*
*
*
(d) Notwithstanding the above floor area ratio limits, 75 spaces of required parking located
on Block 51 for the Retail Parcel pursuant to a covenant under section 130-36, shall not be
counted as permitted floor area. Further, the floor area on the Block 51 Properties and the Block
51 Swap Property may be distributed among such properties by covenant in lieu of unity of title;
and the floor area on the Block 1 Properties mav be distributed among such properties within the
block bv covenant in lieu of unity of title.
SECTION 3. REPEALER. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith be and
the same are hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause or prOVISIon of this
Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder shall not be affected by such invalidity.
2
469
SECTION 5. CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the City Commission that this Ordinance
be entered into the Code, and it is hereby ordained that the sections of this Ordinance may be
renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; and that the word "ordinance" may be
changed to "section" or other appropriate word. The Exhibits to this Ordinance shall not be
codified, but shall be kept on file with this Ordinance in the City Clerk's Office.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect ten days following adoption.
PASSED and ADOPTED this _ day of
,2006.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO
FORM AND LANGUAGE
& FOR EXECUTION
First Reading:
Second Reading:
"1 }1/' ,
Date
Verified by:
Jorge G. Gomez, AICP
Planning Director
Underscore denotes new language
T:\AGENDA\2006\juI1206\Regular\Proposed Block 1 Ordinance rev GH 070606.DOC
3
470
Legal Description for Northwest Parcel
Lot 17, Block 1, Ocean Beach Florida Subdivision,
according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page
38, of the Public Records of Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Exhibit "C"